Laserfiche WebLink
4„18.005 <br />Sections: <br />4.18.005 <br />4.18.007 <br />4.18.010 <br />4.18.020 <br />4.18.030 <br />4.18.040 <br />4.18.050 <br />4.18.060 <br />4.18.070 <br />4.18.080 <br />4.18.090 <br />4.18.095 <br />4.18.100 <br />4.18.105 <br />4.18.110 <br />4.18.115 <br />4.18.120 <br />4.18.130 <br />EXHIBIT 13 <br />Chapter 4.18 <br />MINORITY AND WOMEN'S BUSINESS ENTERPRISES <br />Findings. <br />Purpose. <br />Definitions. <br />Powers and duties. <br />Utilization goals. <br />Accomplishment of utilization goals. <br />Utilization requirements, general. <br />Utilization requirements, specific. <br />Waivers. <br />Monitoring, reporting, and enforcement <br />Annual report required. <br />Graduating firms out of program. <br />Authorization to implement procedures. <br />Implementation resources. <br />Effect of ordinance, status of solicitations. <br />Effective date. <br />Severability. <br />Study and report. <br />(King County 12 -94) 145 <br />REVENUE AND FINANCIAL REGULATION <br />4.18.005 Findings. The county council hereby finds the following facts: <br />A. In hiring and dealing with contractors and subcontractors of all <br />types, public and private owners, developers, contractors, financial <br />institutions and sureties have discriminated and do discriminate against <br />minority and women's businesses doing business or seeking to do business with <br />King County based on the race and sex of the owners of these businesses. This <br />discrimination has been established by public hearings conducted by the county <br />council and other local jurisdictions and by the studies and reports performed <br />for the county by consultants. The factual findings of these reports, <br />specifically the Perkins Coie study dated January 1990 and the Washington <br />Consulting Group study dated July 9, 1990, are incorporated herein by this <br />reference. <br />B. But for the provisions of its past and present minority and women's <br />business enterprise ordinances, King County would have been, and would <br />continue to be, a passive participant in the discrimination against these <br />businesses. <br />C. The provisions of this chapter are necessary to remedy the <br />discrimination against minority and women's businesses and to prevent King <br />County from financing and participating in this discrimination with its <br />contracting dollars. <br />D. The market from which King County draws contractors extends <br />throughout the State of Washington, although the businesses which provide the <br />primary market for King County are located in the King, Pierce, and Snohomish <br />County area. <br />E. King County is prohibited by state law from helping minority and <br />women's businesses overcome the effects of discrimination through financial <br />assistance or reduction of bonding requirements. While the existence of such <br />alternative remedies must continue to be explored, no effective alternatives <br />appear to be presently available. <br />F. Although a program to provide technical assistance to minority and <br />women's businesses cannot provide an adequate immediate remedy for past <br />discrimination against such businesses, such a program can assist in a long- <br />term effort to eliminate the need for the remedies provided by this chapter. <br />