Laserfiche WebLink
City of Tukwila My WebLink |HelpSearch Tips |About |Sign Out
92 2 4 The CITY agrees to have their TAC assist in expediting CITY review and approval of all <br />93 design -build submittals that are required to be made to the CITY, such as, but not limited <br />94 to, detour and traffic control plans, noise variance requests, and right -of -way use permits. <br />95 The STATE, working with its DESIGN BUILDER, shall make all submittals directly to <br />96 the CITY for review <br />97 <br />98 2 5 The STATE agrees to make presentations to the CITY when requested to do so by the <br />99 CITY In addition, the STATE agrees to provide PROJECT updates to CITY staff on a <br />100 monthly basis. These updates will include PROJECT milestones and will be in a format <br />101 suitable for posting on the CITY website or for inclusion in the CITY newsletter <br />102 <br />103 3.0 DESIGN <br />104 <br />105 3 1 All plans for the PROJECT will follow the I -405 Plan Preparation Manual using STATE <br />106 design standards within limited access areas and CITY design standards for CITY streets <br />107 outside of limited access areas. <br />108 <br />109 3.2 The PARTIES have agreed to the aesthetic elements identified and described in the <br />110 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) Guidelines, hereinafter referred to as the "CSS <br />111 GUIDELINES," and agree that, for the PROJECT, the aesthetic treatments of Master <br />112 Plan compatible elements viewed from 1 -405 and incorporated into the PROJECT will <br />113 conform to the CSS GUIDELINES The PARTIES understand that the engineering <br />114 details of aesthetic elements identified in the CSS GUIDELINES are undergoing final <br />115 review and that this review will not change the concepts developed during the CSS <br />116 process. <br />117 <br />118 3.3 If the STATE's DESIGN BUILDER proposes a design change to an element within the <br />119 CITY's corporate limits, the STATE agrees to present the change to the CITY for review <br />120 <br />121 3 4 If the CITY proposes a change to a design element within the CITY's corporate limits, <br />122 the CITY shall request a meeting through the appropriate STATE representative with the <br />123 STATE's DESIGN BUILDER. The STATE agrees to meet in a cooperative spirit to <br />124 review and discuss the proposed change. If the STATE determines the proposed change <br />125 to be feasible and appropriate, the PARTIES shall negotiate the responsibilities for <br />126 payment of costs associated with the requested change based on the benefits of the <br />127 proposed change to each PARTY as well as the PARTIES respective legal obligations. If <br />128 the PARTIES can mutually agree on payment responsibilities, the STATE will <br />129 implement the change. If the PARTIES cannot mutually agree on payment <br />130 responsibilities, the PARTIES will work collaboratively toward resolution at the lowest <br />131 organizational level using the dispute resolution guidelines outlined in Section 7 0 The <br />132 consideration of potential schedule delays, which may result in additional cost, will be of <br />133 paramount importance to both PARTIES, with reducing cost as the pnmary goal and <br />134 acknowledged mutual benefit. <br />135 <br />136 3 5 The STATE will provide the CITY with design development level plans for review The <br />137 CITY will review the plans for conformance with the appropriate STATE and applicable <br />GCA 5099 3 of 8 <br />