Laserfiche WebLink
Housing Element - Version 6.9.15 <br />Revision Matrix 6.25.15 <br />Note: Comments listed without an exhibit reference were delivered verbally during the public hea ing <br />Row # <br />Page# <br />Comment <br />(language changes in strikeout /underline, recommendation in bold) <br />Exhibit# /Date /Source <br />Staff comment /analysis /options <br />1 <br />Purpose. Second paragraph. Change the word "modest" to be consistent <br />with PSRC TOD language. <br />Mann, PC Work Session, <br />6.18.15 <br />Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Now reads <br />"These steps are necessary to plan for growth that will <br />barriers that low <br />reduce prevent modest wage workers <br />and moderate income households from living near their <br />work or transit..." Language from PSRC Growing Transit <br />Communities Strategy - <br />http: / /www.psrc.org /assets /9539 /GTCStrategy.pdf <br />2 <br />2/3 <br />Home Ownership Options. The last sentence states that the current range <br />of housing options does not accommodates older adults hoping to "age in <br />place." I would add that the current range doesn't accommodate older <br />adults who would like to remain in Tukwila but no longer want to live in a <br />large house with a big yard. Some seniors would like to downsize to a <br />small house with a small yard or even a townhouse. <br />Letter from Pam Carter, <br />dated 6.21.15 <br />Comment noted. <br />3 <br />3 <br />Policy 3.1.1. Correct horizon date (typo) <br />Staff edit <br />Staff Recommendation: Policy 3.1.1. now reads "...to <br />meet the regional growth target of 4,800 new housing <br />units by 20132030." <br />4 <br />3 <br />Policy 3.1.2.1 would insert the word "especially" or "particularly" so that it <br />reads: "...sizes particularly in neighborhoods where..." <br />Letter from Pam Carter, <br />dated 6.21.15 <br />Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 3.1.2 <br />now reads "Explore adopting smaller lot sizes, especially <br />in neighborhoods where the historical lot pattern is <br />smaller than the established 6.7 dwelling units per acre <br />(6,500 square foot lots)." <br />5 <br />3 <br />Revise Implementation Strategy on revised lot size. Change "maximum" to <br />"minimum" (typo). <br />Staff edit <br />See below (Row ) <br />6 <br />3 <br />I would delete the first strategy as it sounds like the neighborhood will be <br />deciding the minimum lots sizes. It makes sense to meet with the <br />neighborhood but their wishes should not be the controlling factor. <br />Letter from Pam Carter, <br />dated 6.21.15 <br />The intent of the Implementation Strategy is to involve <br />residents in the process of establishing lot area <br />minimums. Council will ultimately decide on lot area <br />minimums, but community involvement is critical to <br />ensure revised regulations are the best fit for the <br />neighborhood. Staff Recommendation: Revise to keep <br />intent of Implementation Strategy and add language to <br />better define the community's role in the process. The <br />Implementation Strategy now reads "Meet with <br />residents and property owners at the neighborhood <br />level to receive input to help establish desired lot area <br />for the individual <br />maximum- minimums <br />neighborhoods." <br />7 <br />3 <br />6,500 sf minimum lot size and 50 ft minimum lot width requirements in <br />the LDR zone hamstring the number of buildable units and make projects <br />economically unviable, specifically potential project at Riverton United <br />Methodist Church property. Support options to reduce lot size and lot <br />dimensions. <br />Email from Homestead <br />Community Land Trust, <br />dated 6.23.15 <br />Comment noted. Policy 3.1.2 supports exploring options <br />to adopt smaller lot sizes in neighborhoods where the <br />historical lot pattern is smaller than the zoning code <br />requirements. <br />8 <br />3/4 <br />We ask the City include a strategy in the Comprehensive Plan to consider <br />amending the development code requirements to allow for smaller studio <br />housing units. <br />Letter from Bellwether <br />Housing, dated 6.25.15 <br />Amending the development code to allow for a full <br />range of housing options, which may include smaller <br />studio housing units, is addressed in Policy 3.2.2. Staff <br />Recommendation: Keep as is. <br />9 <br />4 <br />Policy 3.2.1. Reword to clarify. The City provides zoning that allows for <br />housing, but does not provide housing. <br />Staff edit <br />Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 3.2.1 <br />now reads "Provide zoning that allows a variety of <br />housing throughout the City to allow for diverse, <br />equitable neighborhoods. <br />10 <br />4 <br />Policies 3.2.2 and 3.2.3.1 support these policies that would enable a <br />greater variety of housing types than currently exist in Tukwila. <br />Letter from Pam Carter, <br />dated 6.21.15 <br />Comment noted. <br />11 <br />4 <br />Policy 3.2.3. Reword to clarify. The City has a limited supply of land. Utilize <br />zoning that allows for housing and other facilities. <br />Mann, PC Work Session, <br />6.18.15 <br />Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 3.2.3 <br />now reads "Provide sufficient appropriate zoning land is <br />eel for housing of all types..." <br />12 <br />4 <br />Suggest the City consider re- introducing the housing options program or <br />to consider a new set of allowances in residential zones that reward the <br />kind of development the City wishes to see. <br />Email from Homestead <br />Community Land Trust, <br />dated 6.23.15 <br />Comment noted. Goal 3.2 and Implementation <br />Strategies support the reinstatement of limited <br />demonstration projects for clustered or cottage housing. <br />13 <br />4 <br />One of the best ways to prevent and address homelessness is to ensure <br />that quality, permanently affordable housing is available for very-low <br />income households. Ask that the City add a policy under Goal 3.2 to "work <br />to address the need for housing affordable to households at less than 30% <br />AMI." <br />Letter from <br />HDC /Futurewise, dated <br />6.23.15 <br />Policy 3.2.2 address housing opportunities for all <br />population segments. Staff Recommendation: Revise <br />Policy 3.2.2 to include language specific to households at <br />less than 30% AMI. Policy 3.2.2 now reads " Encourage a <br />full range of housing opportunities for all population <br />segments, including very-low income households <br />earning less than 30% AMI, through actions..." <br />7 <br />