Laserfiche WebLink
SEPA Checklist <br />5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it <br />would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? <br />The proposed revisions to the landscaping code will affect new or re- <br />development in commercial, industrial, multi - family and non - residential <br />development in the single family district the City by revising in some <br />zoning districts, the amount of front, side or rear landscaping and/or <br />amount of parking lot landscaping required; allow the use of bioretention <br />facilities to substitute for required landscaping; permit landscaping to o be <br />clustered in some zoning districts; establish violations and penalties. The <br />proposed revisions to the landscaping code will not allow or encourage <br />land or shoreline uses that are incompatible with existing plans. <br />Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: <br />N/A <br />How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public service and <br />utilities? <br />The proposed revisions to the landscaping code will not increase demand <br />on transportation or public services and utilities. <br />Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: <br />N/A <br />6. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with Local, State, or Federal <br />laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. <br />The proposed revisions to the landscape code will not conflict with other Tukwila ordinances, <br />or State or Federal requirements related to the protection of the environment. <br />D. SIGNATURE <br />Under the penalty of perjury the above answers under ESA Screening Checklist and State Environmental Policy Act <br />Checklist are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to <br />make its decision. <br />Signature: <br />Date Submitted: 10 ­J (w° _. <br />93 <br />