Laserfiche WebLink
• The City Attorney provided guidance on the questions regarding liability (Attachment F) <br /> • Information from the Public Works Department regarding the responsibility for taking care of <br /> trees that are in the public right-of-way (Attachment G) <br /> • Comments from Vern Meryhew, citizen, (Attachment I) <br /> • a comment letter from Greg and Vanessa Zaputil (Attachment J) <br /> • Chart of comments received and request for changes in the Tree Regulation <br /> Highlights given on the Tree Regulations: <br /> • These regulations affect primarily single-family residential homes that are outside of either the <br /> shoreline jurisdiction or a wetland, a steep slope, a stream or their buffers. <br /> • The City does not currently regulate the removal of trees onsingle-family property unless they <br /> are adjacent to or within a sensitive area. <br /> • We are looking at the Tree Regulations because of the Comprehensive Plan tree canopy goals. <br /> (listed in attachment C) <br /> • The tree canopy for commercial,industrial, and multi-family properties will be addressed <br /> through the Landscaping Code. <br /> • The amount of canopy for each of the zoning districts in the City, is taken from the City's tree <br /> canopy assessment prepared in 202: The low-density residential districts comprise <br /> approximately one third of the zoned'areain the City, and 'the canopy makes up approximately <br /> 59%. Because it was so high,the decision was made not to increase tree canopy when working <br /> on the Comp Plan goal but to maintain the current 47'0/o tree canopy in the City. <br /> • Once the City Council adopts the new Tree Regulations the Department of Community <br /> Development will work on handouts for educational purposes. <br /> • A Tree permit w6uld be requiredwhen doing work in a critical root zone;pruning a heritage <br /> tree more than 20% of the existing crown, for the removal of trees over 8"in diameter; if <br /> removing more that the number''oftrees allowed in a 36-month period; or when trees are <br /> illegally removed. <br /> • When tree replacement is required,the number of replacement trees is based on the size of the <br /> tree canopy. Hazard or defective trees are not required to be replaced,there is some suggested <br /> language to add to the regulations for clarification— staff will address later. <br /> • Arbbrist reports are not required for removal of trees on single-family properties,which was a <br /> change made by the Planning Commission. It is required for removal of heritage trees, or if <br /> development is on a site where heritages trees are in close proximity, and for proposed <br /> development,,Which are primarily for subdivisions or short plats greater than four lots. <br /> Commissioner Stander asked the following additional questions at tonight's meeting that she <br /> requested be included in the minutes. <br /> Question regarding the January 11, 2018,packet, staff report prepared December 28th, attachment E— <br /> Goal 4.13,Page 49 of the January 25, 2018 packet. Residential zone is not listed there,is it somewhere <br /> else? <br /> Staff: The last paragraph was left off on page 3 5, which should read, "no net loss of canopy cover in <br /> individual categories as listed below: Low Density Residential: maintain current Citywide coverage of <br /> 47% and Medium and High Density Residential maintain current Citywide coverage of 40%." <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> 4 <br />