Laserfiche WebLink
&CH;H=?#IGGCNN?? -CHON?MȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚȚ-;L=B ǸțǴDzdzǺ <br /> <br />working toward program evaluation. Chair Quinn acknowledged that across the board cuts can <br />be problematic and asked if Administration is already discussing the kind of possibilities <br />mentioned by Councilmember Kruller. Trimming the budget is an institutional decision and he <br />would like to see a proactive approach from Administration. Councilmember Robertson added <br />consulting fees to the list of things that should be evaluated for cost savings. Staff noted that <br />decision making on the Public Safety Plan budget will occur around May-June, and near-term <br />operational reductions can be part of that discussion as requested. Chair Quinn also requested <br />that the other Council standing committees be briefed on discussions of operational reductions <br />proposed by Administration. <br /> <br />#;JCN;F )GJLIP?G?HN 0F;H 0LCILCNCT;NCIH <br />Another tool for the Council to consider is to reprioritize the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to <br />dedicate General Fund dollars that transfer to the CIP to the Public Safety Plan. General Fund <br />dollars go to leverage grant funds and other matching funds, and the City has budgeted an <br />average of $3 million per year over the past four years. Council could also choose to reduce but <br />not eliminate the General Fund transfer. In addition, REET 2 funds that are currently dedicated <br />to bridges and arterial streets could go to financing the Public Safety Plan. Chair Quinn <br />requested that staff make thoughtful, professional recommendations around prioritization that <br />will help the Council make defensible decisions. He requested that staff show Committees the <br />potential impacts to projects if certain General Fund reductions are made. Councilmember <br />Robertson noted the Strander Boulevard Extension project assumes a significant General Fund <br />contribution and suggested that the possibility of a Local Improvement District be considered for <br />affected property owners. Staff also noted that Attachment C to the CIP is a good resource for <br />this topic as it shows City funding and grant funding for residential street projects. <br /> <br />At the next Committee meeting on March 20, staff will bring updated versions of the financial <br />planning matrix and be prepared to discuss the project schedule and ramifications of delaying <br />certain aspects. The Committee requested to also have a discussion on market conditions. <br />RETURN TO COMMITTEE. <br /> <br />III.MISCELLANEOUS <br /> <br />Adjourned at 6:27 p.m. <br /> <br /> Committee Chair Approval <br /> <br />-CHON?M <S ,(ț 2?PC?Q?> <S 2"ț 6# <br />