Laserfiche WebLink
City of Tukwila <br />City Council Finance Committee <br />FINANCE COMMITTEE <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 5, 2018 - 5:30 p.m. - Hazelnut Conference Room, City Hall <br />Councilmembers: De'Sean Quinn, Chair; Dennis Robertson, Kate Kruller <br />Staff: David Cline, Bruce Linton, Peggy McCarthy, Henry Hash, Rachel Bianchi, Jay <br />Wittwer, Laura Crandall, Laurel Humphrey, Trish Kinlow <br />CALL TO ORDER: Committee Chair Quinn called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. <br />I. PRESENTATIONS <br />II. BUSINESS AGENDA <br />A. Public Safety Plan Financing <br />As follow up to the May 22, 2018 Committee meeting, staff provided various financing scenarios <br />for the Public Safety Plan including Whitebirch modeling against the six-year financial forecast. <br />Staff also provided preliminary information on 1st quarter sales tax, which at this time appears <br />to be equivalent to 1st quarter 2017. The Committee was asked to recommend a preferred <br />financing scenario to be presented to the full Council at its June 11, 2018 Work Session with a <br />goal of final action on June 18, 2018. Staff's recommendation is "Option E" with LTGO financing <br />over 30 years, as shown below: <br />This scenario includes construction of all facilities within the current timeline, dedicates <br />$30M to shops, and implements a State financing tool that allows cities to finance large <br />apparatus over 10 years. Staff believes that this scenario provides the greatest flexibility for <br />the general fund. <br />Councilmember Robertson spoke to his concerns about the sales tax, as the financial <br />analysis of all scenarios assumes a small annual increase and there is no indication this will <br />occur. He looked at two additional scenarios with a 0% increase and a 1.5% increase and is <br />concerned about the impacts to the fund balance. <br />LTGO Repayment <br />Method <br />Option <br />FS 51 <br />FS 52 <br />FS 54 <br />A&E <br />JC <br />— <br />PW <br />LTGO <br />Bond <br />Range of <br />Annual Cash <br />Contribution <br />Capacity <br />from <br />maturing <br />debt <br />Total <br />GF <br />Cont. <br />Total <br />Debt <br />Service <br />— <br />E-30 <br />$12M <br />$17M <br />$14M <br />$15M <br />$68M <br />$30M <br />$55M <br />$283K <br />in 2017 <br />$830K $2M <br />per yr <br />$51.9M <br />$70.6M <br />This scenario includes construction of all facilities within the current timeline, dedicates <br />$30M to shops, and implements a State financing tool that allows cities to finance large <br />apparatus over 10 years. Staff believes that this scenario provides the greatest flexibility for <br />the general fund. <br />Councilmember Robertson spoke to his concerns about the sales tax, as the financial <br />analysis of all scenarios assumes a small annual increase and there is no indication this will <br />occur. He looked at two additional scenarios with a 0% increase and a 1.5% increase and is <br />concerned about the impacts to the fund balance. <br />