Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATIONAL MEMO <br />Page 3 <br />outreach strategy (see "DRAFT Potential B&O Implementation Communication Plan, attached to <br />this memo). <br />The proposed communications plan is comprehensive. If the City decides to implement a B&O <br />beginning January 1, 2019, the communications plan would need to be streamlined. Some <br />businesses may see a January 1, 2019 implementation date as a burden as many businesses <br />develop budgets in advance of the beginning of the year. Finding the right balance of an <br />implementation date that meets the City's needs and allows for adequate outreach will be <br />important. <br />Preliminary Draft Ordinances <br />The draft ordinance to implement a B&O is based on the model ordinance produced by the <br />Association of Washington Cities (AWC). When reviewing the ordinance, keep in mind there are <br />elements that are mandatory. Notes are included on the draft as comments. They highlight <br />Council decision points. <br />The Administrative draft code is provided as a separate chapter and is not included in the B&O <br />ordinance. This code can remain as a separate chapter or be incorporated into the B&O tax <br />chapter. By establishing the Administrative code separately for the B&O, the groundwork would <br />be laid for the City to include administrative code for all taxes in one administrative code chapter <br />making it easy to reference filing requirements, payment methods, and penalty rates, and <br />promotes cohesive practices. <br />Other Revenue Options <br />Adoption of a B&O tax, along with the previously discussed reductions in expenditures being <br />proposed for the 2019/2020 budget, could close the budget gap created by the flattening sales <br />tax and the discontinuation of the sales tax mitigation revenue and allow the City to provide its <br />current level of service. Further, and importantly, adoption of this tax would better diversify and <br />stabilize revenues, which would benefit the City long term. Additional revenue could reach $3 <br />million or more. However, implementing a new tax is time consuming and requires significant <br />education and outreach to the business community. <br />Should the Council choose to consider other options, raising the Business License fee, in <br />coordination with increases in other fees and taxes, could generate the goal of $2 million <br />additional revenue. For example, the 2018 budget for business license revenue is $2.4 million <br />and the City is on track to collect that and more in 2018. The current business license fee is $70 <br />per full time employee or $35 per part time employee. If the fee were raised to $112 per full time <br />employee and $56 per part time employee, an additional $1.5 million could be generated. In <br />comparison, the business license fee for the City of Kirkland is $105 per FTE and $112 for <br />Redmond — neither city has a B&O tax. Raising the City's fee would bring it in line with these <br />rates. Another option that has been discussed is raising the gambling tax. If it were raised by 1 % <br />to 11% - the same rate charged by the City of Kent and in King County's unincorporated areas - <br />almost $400,000 could be generated in additional revenue. <br />Revised Proposed Timeline <br />If the best option is a B&O tax, the schedule below more realistically estimates the implementation <br />timeframe. The City of Renton used one year to implement. The City of Shoreline hired a tax <br />accountant effective January 1, 2018 for a January 1, 2019 B&O tax implementation date — thus <br />W:12018 Info Memos\BO tax.docx 3 <br />