Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF WASHINGTON <br />DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE <br />1011 PIUM Street SE PO Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504-252'5 (360) 725-4000 <br />www.commerce.wa,.gov <br />June 6, 2018 <br />r. S randon Miles <br />usiness Relations Manager <br />City of Tukwila <br />6200 Southcenter Boulevard <br />Tukwila, Washington 98188 <br />RE: Study on the current and on -going impacts of the Seattle -Tacoma International Airport - <br />The implementation of Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill (ESSB) 6032-Section 127(63). <br />Dear Mr. Miles: <br />The Washington State Legislature formally asked the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to <br />begin a study that evaluates the on -going impacts of the Seattle -Tacoma International Airport. <br />The study has the following parameters: <br />$300,000 of the general fund —state appropriation for fiscal year 2019 and $300,000 of the <br />general fund —local appropriation are provided solely for Commerce to contract with a <br />consultant to study the current and ongoing impacts of the SeaTac International Airport <br />State funding provided in this serves as a state match and may not be spent unless $300,000 <br />of local matching funds is transferred to Commerce. <br />Commerce must seek input on project scoping and consultant selection from the cities of <br />SeaTac, Burien, Des Moines, Tukwila, Federal Way and Normandy Park and the Port of <br />Seattle plus members of the legislature. <br />Commerce must collect data and relevant information from various sources including the <br />Port of Seattle, the listed cities and communities (above), and other studies. <br />The study must include, but not be limited to, an analysis of the impacts that the current and <br />ongoi g airport operations have o quality of life. These impacts are associated with air <br />traffic noise, public health, traffic, congestion, parking in residential areas, pedestrian access <br />to and around the airport, public safety and crime within the cities, effects on residential and <br />non-residential property values, and economic development opportunities, in the cities of <br />44 <br />