The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReg 2018-11-19 Item 3H - Agreement - Strander Boulevard Extension Phase III Value Engineering Consultant for $75,000COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials MeetinsDate Prepared by Mayor's review Counci I review 11/19/18 HH 1L/4 - ITEM INFORMATION ITEM No. 3.H. STAFF SPONSOR: HENRY HASH ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 11/19/18 AGENDA ITIMTITu1 Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3 Value Engineering Consultant Agreement CATEGORY LI Discussion Mtg Date M Motion Mtg Date 11/19/18 [I] Resolution Mtg Date 111 Ordinance Mg Date 11 Bid Award Mtg Date 0 Public Hearing Mtg Date 11] Other Mtg Date SPONSOR LICouncil 0Mayor LIFJR El DCD LIFinance Ohre LITS LIP&R LIPolice HPW LICourt SP °Molt' S Council is being asked to approve a consultant contract for Value Engineering of the SUMMARY Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3 Project in the not to exceed amount of $75,000. The design consultant is currently at the 30% level and a value engineering consultant contract will analyze the project's scope and costs. RFQs were published and three consultants responded with interviews forthcoming. Due to time constraints, Council is being asked to authorize a contract in the not to exceed amount of $75,000. REVIEWED BY LI C.O.W. Mtg. III CDN Comm LI Finance Comm. El Public Safety Comm. LI Arts Comm. LI Parks Comm. LI Planning Comm. COMMITTEE CHAIR: THOMAS MCLEOD Trans &Infrastructure DATE: 11/13/18 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. CommuTIT Public Works Department Unanimous Approval; Forward to Consent Agenda COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE ExPI NDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $75,000.00 $6,128,000.00 $ Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND Comments: (page 10, Proposed 2019 CIP) MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 11/19/18 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 11/19/18 Informational Memorandum dated 11/09/18 2017 CIP, page 13 and page 10, Proposed 2019 CIP Current project cost estimate Minutes from the Transportation and Infrastructure Committee 11/13/18 117 118 Allan Ekberg, Mayor Public Works Department - Henry Hash, Director INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Transportation and Infrastructure Committee FROM: Henry Hash, Public Works Director 4f// BY: Steve Carstens, PE, Senior Program Manager CC: Mayor Ekberg DATE: November 9, 2018 SUBJECT: Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3 Project No. 98610403 Project Update and Value Engineering Consultant Approval ISSUE Update on the Strander Blvd Extension Phase 3 Project and approve Value Engineering consultant contract. BACKGROUND The City of Renton completed Phase 1 of the Strander Boulevard/SW 27th Street (Oakesdale Avenue to Naches Avenue) in 2008 and Phase 2 (Naches Avenue to the new Tukwila Station/Sounder Commuter Rail Station parking lot, between BNSF and UPRR) in 2014. Phase 3 is being led by the City of Tukwila. Tukwila received Federal grant funding for the preliminary engineering and right-of-way phases and is proceeding with the design process as part of the preliminary engineering phase. DISCUSSION In May 2018, Berger ABAM (Berger) provided the City with the 30% plans for review and an updated cost estimate of the total project costs. Since May 2018, the consultant and staff have been focused on addressing the comments on the 30% plans and continuing utility coordination. A Value Engineering Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was advertised and three consultants responded on November 1, 2018 and will be interviewed for a forthcoming consultant contract. Due to time constraints, we are asking approval for the Value Engineering consultant contract in a not to exceed amount of $75,000. FISCAL IMPACT Amount Expended to date $1,509,677 Current Funding and Expenditures Budget Actuals Proposed CIP Budget $5,628,000 WSDOT Discretionary Funding (additional) 500,000 Berger Abam Design Contract $4,147,328 Berger Abam Early Start 2016 313,853 BP/Olympic Pipeline Design 630,000 UPRR Design 25,000 Staff and Miscellaneous Expenses 72,934 $ 60,000 Berger Abam Design Supplement 166,000 Value Engineering Study (Approx.) 75,000 Sprint Engineering Costs 20 000 Subtotal $6,128 000 $5.189.115 $321,000 Subtotal (Actuals plus Proposed) $5,510,115 Current Discretionary Funds and Project Balance $617.885 W:\PW Eng\PROJECTS\A- RW & RS Projects\Strander Extension (98610403)\01_Preliminary Engineering\20181113 TIC update (003) gl.docx 119 Page 2 Strander Blvd Phase 3 November 9, 2018 Total Project Cost (Design, RW, and Construction) $83,781,626 Subtract Project Costs with Secured Funding (18,963,961) Funding Gap (unsecured) ($64,817,665) It should be noted, staff anticipates that there may be additional design supplements in the future related to the outcome of the Value Engineering study as Berger may need to modify the Strander Blvd Phase 3 design. There also may be additional utility relocation design fees. There is an additional $500,000 in WSDOT discretionary funds that were provided to the City in June 2017. These funds can be used for any phase of the project and staff is electing to use them in the Preliminary Engineering (design) phase. Project Timeline 2018 (September -December) 2019 (January — March) 2019 (May) 2019 (October) 2020 (October) 2020 (Jan) to 2029 (Dec) Funding Timeline 2019 (September) 2020 (January) 2030 (January) Continue utility coordination and address 30% design comments Perform Value Engineering (VE) study Complete revised 30% plans incorporating VE changes Complete right-of-way phase Complete final plans, specifications, and estimate. Project ready to go out to bid Project required to be under construction during this time period and completed by December 2029. If the project is not under construction by September 2019, FASTLANE's $5 million must be relinquished to funding source. Note, there is no direct transfer of funding from these organizations to the City for the construction phase, so the funds would be 'unobligated' and not made available to the City after this date. City would need to provide an additional $5 million for construction costs/funding gap. If the project is not under construction by January 2020, FMSIB's $5 million must be relinquished to funding source. Note, there is no direct transfer of funding from these organizations to the City for the construction phase, so the funds would be 'unobligated' and not made available to the City after this date. City would need to provide an additional $5 million for construction costs/funding gap. If the project is not constructed/completed by January 2030, all federal funds used for design and right-of-way must be returned to federal funding source ($5,646,750). RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to approve the Value Engineering consultant contract for the Strander Boulevard Phase 3 Project with a not to exceed amount of $75,000 and consider this item on the Consent Agenda at the November 19, 2018 Regular Meeting. ATTACHMENTS • 2017 CIP, pg. 13 and Draft 2019 CIP pg. 10 • Current estimate W:\PW Eng\PROJECTS\A- RW & RS Projects\Strander Extension (98610403)\01_Preliminary Engineering\20181113 TIC update (003) gl.docx 120 PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: MAINT. IMPACT: COMMENT: CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2017 to 2022 Strander Blvd Extension Phase 3 Project No. 98610403 Design and construct arterial improvements for a new roadway extending Strander Blvd/SW 27th St from West Valley Highway to Oaksdale Ave in the City of Renton. East/west capacity between 1-405 and S 180 St is needed to serve Tukwila and Renton access. Project segregated into three phases. Phase I extended Stander Blvd/SW 27th St from Oaksdale Ave to Naches Ave SW. Phase II constructed a 2 lane road from Naches to the Sounder Train's Tukwila Longacres Station's parking lot. Paid Renton $1 m for Phase I & II. Phase III will construct the undercrossing of the UPRR and complete the 4 lane roadway from West Valley Hwy in Tukwila to Naches Ave SW in Renton. New street. Project partners include the City of Renton, Boeing, WSDOT, FMSIB, Sound Transit, Metro, Amtrak, and BNSF and UP Railroads. Funds in 2015-16 are for updated cost estimates and grant applications. STP (PSRC), FAST Lane, and TIGER grants were submitted in 2016. FINANCIAL (in $000's) Through Estimated 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 58 440 2,500 2,000 4,998 Land (R/W) 104 450 1,000 1,554 Wetland Mitigation 50 500 550 Const. Mgmt. 2,800 2,000 4,800 Construction 15,000 12,200 27,200 TOTAL EXPENSES 162 440 3,000 3,000 18,300 14,200 0 0 0 39,102 FUND SOURCES Awarded STP Grant 2,551 2,595 5,146 Proposed TIGER Grant 7,900 5,894 13,794 Proposed State TIB Grant 2,500 2,500 5,000 Proposed FMSIB Grant 2,500 2,500 5,000 Proposed STP Grant 5,000 3,000 8,000 City Oper. Revenue 162 440 449 405 400 306 0 0 0 2,162 TOTAL SOURCES 162 440 3,000 3,000 18,300 14,200 0 0 0 33,956 2017 - 2022 Capital Improvement Program 13 121 PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: JUSTIFICATION: STATUS: MAINT. IMPACT: COMMENT: CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2019 to 2024 Strander Blvd Extension Phase 3 Project No. 98610403 Design and construct arterial improvements for a new roadway extending Strander Blvd/SW 27th St from West Valley Highway to Naches Ave SW in the City of Renton. East/west capacity between 1-405 and S 180 St is needed to serve Tukwila and Renton access. Project segregated into three phases. Phase I extended Stander Blvd/SW 27th St from Oaksdale Ave to Naches Ave SW. Phase II constructed a 2 lane road from Naches to the Sounder Train's Tukwila Longacres Station's parking lot. Paid Renton $1m for Phase I & II. Phase III will construct the undercrossing of the UPRR and complete the 4 lane roadway from West Valley Hwy in Tukwila to Naches Ave SW in Renton. New street. Project partners include the City of Renton, Boeing, WSDOT, FMSIB, Sound Transit, Metro, Amtrak, and BNSF and UP Railroads. Funds in 2015-16 are for updated cost estimates and grant applications. STP (PSRC), FAST Lane, and TIGER grants were submitted in 2016. FINANCIAL (in $000's) Through Estimated 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 359 3,269 2,000 5,628 Land (R/W) 104 1,720 1,824 Wetland Mitigation 50 500 550 Const. Mgmt. 2,000 2,000 4,000 Construction 35,889 35,889 71,778 TOTAL EXPENSES 463 3,319 3,720 38,389 37,889 0 0 0 0 83,780 FUND SOURCES Awarded STP Grant 1,946 3,200 5,146 Proposed STP Grant 4,760 4,760 Awarded Fastlane Grant 2,500 2,500 5,000 Awarded FMSIB Grant 2,500 2,500 5,000 Proposed Build America 25,000 25,000 Proposed State TIB Grant 12,000 12,000 Proposed State/Federal 8,389 16,129 24,518 City Oper. Revenue 463 1,373 520 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,356 TOTAL SOURCES 463 1,373 3,720 38,389 37,889 0 0 0 0 83,780 ° Q Project Location ti �o ; _.]� I 160 at I _ _-..JV R 4�iI 1.. ..,4 rua 11110 .btia *n C. _ r � P o "g '.. I W Ali ♦ ° ,.[(rtamo ` s ' � re u u ° Pr Tn_ 0, [J....,...4 f �f / S ,Otltli -.-� T 2019 - 2024 Capital Improvement Program 122 10 1 of 12 Item No, Schedule A Desc Quontity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules MOBILIZATION 1 1 1 0001 1MOBILIZATION IL.S. I 15.0% $8,681,105 $8,681,105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,681,105 $8,681,105 PREPARATION 2 1 0035 CLEARING AND GRUBBING L.S. $ 70,200 $ 70,200 $ - $ - S 70,200 3 3 0047 REMOVING MANHOLE EACH $ 1,050 $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 3,150 4 42 0049 REMOVING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $ 980 $ 41,160 S - $ - $ 41,160 5 I 0050 REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS L.S. $ 144,000 $ 144,000 $ - $ - $ 144,000 6 955 0100 REMOVING CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. $ 80 $ 76,400 $ - $ - $ 76,400 7 2.363 0108 REMOVING CEMENT CONC. CURB AND GUTTER L.F. $ 21 $ 49,623 $ - $ - $ 49,623 8 898 0110 REMOVING CEMENT CONC. CURB L.F. $ 7 $ 6,286 $ - $ - $ 6,286. 9 6,600 0120 REMOVING ASPHALT CONC. PAVEMENT S.Y. $ 12 $ 79,200 S - $ - $ 79,200 10 703 0130 REMOVING ASPHALT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. $ 8 $ 5,624 $ - $ - S 5,624 II 98 0150 REMOVING TRAFFIC ISLAND S.Y. $ 78 $ 7,644 $ - $ - S 7,644 12 136 0170 REMOVING GUARDRAIL L.F. $ 11 $ 1,496 $ - $ - $ 1,496 13 4 0182 REMOVING GUARDRAIL ANCHOR EACH $ 322 $ 1,288 $ - $ - S 1,288 14 3,832 0187 REMOVING PAINT LINE L.F. $ 1 $ 4,982 $ - $ - $ 4,982 15 16 0199 REMOVING PAINTED TRAFFIC MARKING EACH $ 116 $ 1,856 $ - $ - $ 1,856 16 796 0203 REMOVING PAINTED CROSSWALK LINE S.F. $ 6 $ 4,378 $ - $ - $ 4,378 17 4 0208 REMOVING RAISED PAVEMENT MARKER HUND $ 185 $ 740 $ - $ - $ 740 18 3,292 0220 REMOVING CHAIN LINK FENCE L.F. $ 13 $ 42,796 $ - $ - $ 42,796 19 I 0254 REMOVING SOLDIER PILE SHAr'r OBSTRUCTIONS EST. $ 7,350 $ 7,350 $ - $ - $ 7,350 20 1 0256 REMOVING SHAFT OBSTRUCTIONS EST. $ 859,095 $ 859,095 $ $ $ 859,095 PREPARATION $1,407,268 $0 $0 $1,407,268 GRADING 21 12,650 0310 ROADWAY EXCAVATION INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 17.00 $ 215,050,00 $ - $ - $ 215,050.00 22 9,315 0421 GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 11.00 $ 102,465.00 $ - $ - $ 102,465.00 23 9,315 0470 EMBANKMENT COMPACTION C.Y. $ 2.00 $ 18,630.00 $ - $ - $ 18,630.00 GRADING $ 336,145.00 $ - $ - $ 336,145.00 11hMs1.oborn.com1Projecls_FW1FoderalWay120181A18.00051001En01noeringfCost Estimate\Ott Sakai RevievACoal Estmato 0tt Sakai Comparison Enabled_dlslsu 7/9/2018 123 2 of12 Item No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Best Cost Total All Schedules GRADING - UPRR SHOOFLY 24 6,321 XX-0I SUBBALLAST TON $ 21 $ 132,741 $ - $ - $ 132,741 25 345 XX-02 TEMPORARY SURCHARGE WALL BLOCK EACH $ 30 $ 10,350 S - $ - $ 10,350 26 15,368 XX-35 GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL SURCHARGE TON S 23 $ 353,464. $ - $ - $ 353,464 27 33.322 0431 GRAVEL BORROW INCL. HAUL TON $ 23 $ 766,406 $ - $ - $ 766.406 28 7.415 1086 QUARRY SPALLS TON $ 16 $ 118,640 $ - $ - $ 118,640 29 120 XX-24 LIGHT WEIGHT FILL CY $ 150 $ 13.000 $ - $ - $ 13,000 30 1,100 XX-33 TEMPORARY SHOOFLY WALL EACH $ 30 $ 33,000 $ - $ - $ 33,000 31 15 XX-29 4 FT DIAM PRIMARY SHAFT LF $ 720 $ 10,300 $ - $ - S 10,800 32 16 XX-30 4 FT DIAM SECONDARY SHAFT LF $ 450 $ 7,200 $ - $ - $ 7,200 GRADING - UPRR SHOOFLY S 1,450,601.00 $ - $ - $ 1,450,601.00 f/f fsl.abam.comfPraJects_FIMFederatWay120181A18.00851001Enginaedng/Cost EstimetelOtt Sakal Reulow1Cost Estimate Ott Sakel Camparlson_Enabled dlxlsx 7/9/2018 124 3 of 12 liana No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Sid. hem No. Itent.Descriplion Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules DRAINAGE 31 14,745 7005 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B C.Y. $ 17 $ 250,665 $ - $ - $ 250,665 32 3 1063 COMBINATION INLET EACH $ 1,410 $ 4,230 $ - $ - $ 4,230 33 10 1075 HEAVY LOOSE RIPRAP TON $ 70 $ 700 $ - $ - $ 700 34 1,792 1161 UNDERDRAIN PIPE 8 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 12 $ 21,504 $ - $ - $ 21,504 35 1,848 3016 HIGH -DENSITY POLYETI-IYLENE(HDPE) PIPE 12 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 32 $ 59,136 $ - $ - $ 59,136 36 29 3017 HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE 18 IN. DIAM. L.P. $ 38 $ 1,102 $ - $ - $ 1,102 37 835 3018 HIGH -DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (1-IDPE) PIPE 24 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 263 $ 219,605 $ - - $ 219.605 38 36 3091 CATCH BASIN TYPE I EACH $ 1,653 $ 59,508 $ - $ - $ 59,508 39 13 3105 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 481N. DIAM. EACH $ 3,760 S 48,880 $ - $ - $ 48,880 40 1 3107 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 72 IN. DIAM. EACH $ 5,763 $ 5,763 $ - $ - $ 5,763 41 1 3109 CATCH BASIN TYPE 2 60 IN. DIAM. EACH S 4,975 $ 4;975 $ - $ - $ 4,975 42 788 3869 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER MAIN 12 IN. DIAM. L.P. $ 60 $ 47,280 $ - $ - $ 47,280 43 226 3872 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER MAIN 18 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 410 $ 92,660. $ - $ - $ 92,660 44 13 3874 DUCTILE IRON PIPE FOR WATER MAIN 24 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 92 $ 1,196 $ - $ - S 1,196 45 70 XX-04 36" DIAM. CMP CULVERT PIPE L.P. $ 45 $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 3,150 46 I XX-14 GROUNDWATER PUMP L.S. $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 47 1 XX-15 EXPAND EXISTING PUMP STATION L.S. $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ - $ - $ 500,000 48 I XX-19 UPGRADE DETENTION POND L.S. $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 49 I XX-37 SOUND TRANSIT STORM L.S. $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ 30,000 DRAINAGE $ 1,600,354 $ - $ - $ 1,600,354 SANITARY SEWER 50 379 3767 PVC SANITARY SEWER PIPE 8 IN. DIAM. L.F. $ 40 $ 15,160 $ 15,160 51 XX-20 RELOCATE 36" SEWER L.S. $ 1,066,000 $ 1.066,000 $ S $ 1.066,000 SANITARY SEWER S 1,081,160 $ $ 1,081,160 WATER LINES 52 3 3850 MOVING EXISTING HYDRANTS EACH $ 2,500 5 7,500 $ - $ - $ 7,500 53 3 3852 RECONNECTING EXISTING HYDRANTS EACH $ 1,850 $ 5,550 $ - $ - $ 5,550 SUBTOTAL $ 13,050 $ -, $ - $ 13,050 54 I TAX 8.80% $ 1,148 $ - $ - $ 1,148 ltt fs1.abam,comlProjects_PMFederalWay120189 18.00851001Englneedng\Coal Esllmalo\Ott Sakai RevlewfCosl Estimala_011 Sakai Compadson_Enabled rifxlsx 719/2010 125 4 of 12 Item No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule 13 Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules WATER LINES $ 14,198 $ - $ - $ 14,198 STRUCTURE 55 160 4049 SHAFT - 36 IN. DIAMETER L.F. $ 200 $ 32,000 $ - $ - S 32,000 56 460 4053 FURNISHING SOLDIER PILE L.F. $ 250 $ 115,000 $ - $ - $ 115,000 57 3,380 4149 ST. REINF. BAR FOR BRIDGE LB. $ 1 $ 4,056 $ - $ - $ 4,056 58 61,250 4150 ST. REINF. BAR FOR RETAINING WALL LB. $ I $ 73,500 $ - $ - $ 73,500 59 20 4322 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR BRIDGE C.Y. $ 400 $ 8,000 $ - $ - $ 8,000 60 310 4139 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR RETAINING WALL C.Y. $ 400 $ 124,000 $ - $ - $ 124,000 61 1,710 4202 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR SECANT CAP & STEM WALL C.Y. $ 400 $ 684,000 $ - $ - $ 684,000 62 60 4202 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR WALL IMPROVEMENTS C.Y. $ 400 $ 24,000 $ - $ - $ 24,000 63 38,270 4204 CONC. CLASS 4000W FOR SEAL C.Y. $ 169 $ 6,466,108 S - $ - $ 6,466,108 64 2,370 4299 LAGGING S.F. $ 45 $ 106,650 . $ - $ - $ 106,650 t\t5ts1.4bam.com\Projects_FtMFedera1Wa142018A18,00851001Enolneednp1Cost Estimate \Ott Sakai ReviovACast Estlmale_Ott Sakai Comparison Enabled_rlf.xlsx 7/9/2018 126 5of12 Item No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. Item Na. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules 65 1 4300 SUPERSTRUCTURE L.S. $ 681,056 $ 681,056 $ - $ - $ 681,056 66 90 4338 EXPANSION JOINT SYSTEM COMPRESSION SEAL - SUPERSTR. L.F. $ 125 $ 11,250 $ - $ - $ 11,250 67 110 4456 SCARIFYING CONC. SURFACE S.Y. $ 114 $ 12,540 $ - $ - S 12,540 68 16 4483 PERMANENT GROUND ANCHOR EACH $ 5,000 $ 80,000 $ $ - $ 80,000 69 16 4484 PERMANENT GROUND ANCHOR PERFORMANCE TEST EACH $ 2,000 $ 32,000 $ - $ - S 32,000 70 1 4485 PERMANENT GROUND ANCHOR VERIFICATION TEST L.S. $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 71 87,710 7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 24 $ 2,105,040 $ - $ - $ 2,105,040 72 78,190 7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B S.F. $ 10 $ 781,900 $ -, $ - $ 781,900 73 240 5656 BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB S.Y. $ 500 $ 120,000 $ - $ - $ 120,000 74 1 XX-21 PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE L.S. $ 283,206 $ 283,206 S - $ - $ 283.206 75 950 XX-22 WALL FASCIA CY $ 1,150 $ 1,092,622 $ - $ - $ 1,092,622 76 188.880 XX-23 ST. REINFORCED FOR WALL FASCIA LB $ 1 $ 226,656 $ - $ - $ 226,656 77 I XX-25 SHOOFLY BRIDGE L.S. $ 660.591 $ 660,591 $ - $ - $ 660,591 78 341,640 XX-27 ST. REINFORCED FOR SECANT CAP AND WALL LB $ 1 $ 409,968 $ - $ - $ 409,968 79 8,190 XX-28 ST. REINFORCED FOR WALL IMPROVEMENTS LB $ I $ 9,828 $ - $ - $ 9,828 80 12,130 XX-29 4 FT DIAM PRIMARY SHAFT LF $ 784 $ 9,506,807 S - $ - $ 9,506,807 81 12,130 XX-30 4 FT DIAM SECONDARY SHAFT LE $ 514 $ 6,231,707 $ - $ - $ 6,231,707 82 66 4160 QA SHAFT TEST EACH $ 2,000 $ 132,000 $ - $ - $ 132,000 83 1 XX-36 TEMPORARY STRUTS L.S. $ 569,944 $ 569,944 $ - $ - $ 569,944 STRUCTURE $ 30,594,430 $ - $ - $ 30,594,430 STRUCTURE - BNSF ROW 84 7,540 4006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS A INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 24 $ 180,960 $ - $ - $ 180,960: 85 1 4013 SHORING Oft EXTRA EXCAVATION CL. A L.S. $ 41,290 $ 41,290 $ - $ - S 41,290 86 70 XX-18 PERVIOUS STRUCTURE BACKFILL CY $ 30 $ 2,100 $ - $ - $ 2,100 87 1 4085 FURNISHING AND DRIVING STEEL TEST PILE EACH $ 21,000 $ 21,000 $ - $ - S 21,000 88 2,768 4090 FURNISHING ST. PILING L.F. $ 100 $ 276,800 $ - $ - $ 276,800 89 32 4095 DRIVING ST. PILE EACH $ 4,000 $ 128,000 $ - $ - $ 128,000 90 50 4202 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR WALL IMPROVEMENTS C.Y. $ 400 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 91 1,940 4204 CONC. CLASS 4000W FOR SEAL C.Y. $ 155 $ 301,610 $ - $ - $ 301,610 92 80 4456 SCARIFYING CONC. SURFACE S.Y. $ 114 $ 9,120 $ - $ - $ 9,120 93 12 4483 PERMANENT GROUND ANCHOR EACH $ 5,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ 60,000 94 12 4484 PERMANENT GROUND ANCHOR PERFORMANCE TEST EACH $ 2,000 $ 24,000 $ - $ - $ 24,000 95 32 8376 FURNISHING STEEL PILE TIP OR SHOE EACH $ 2,500 $ 80,000 $ - $ - $ 80,000 \\IwfsLab nm.comtProjects_FIMFoderalWayt2018W1o.00851001Enoineenng\Cost EstimatelOtt Sakai Reviee. Cost Estimate O11 Sakai Compartson_Enobled_rlt.xlsx 7/9/2018 127 6 0112 Item No. Schedule A Desc. Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules 96 51,330 4149 ST. REINF. BAR FOR BRIDGE LB. $ 1 $ 61,596 $ - $ - $ 61,596 97 6,100 XX-28 ST. REINFORCED FOR WALL IMPROVEMENTS LB S l $ 7,320 S - $ - $ 7,320 98 260 4322 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR BRIDGE C.Y. $ 400 $ 104,000 $ - $ - $ 104,000 99 7,460 7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL C.Y. S 24 $ 179.040 $ - $ - $ 179,040 100 750' 7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B S.F. $ 10 $ 7,500 $ - $ - $ 7,500 101 330 XX-29 4 FT DIAM PRIMARY SHAFT LF $ 720 $ 237,600 $ - $ - $ 237,600 102 330 XX-30 4 FTDIAM SECONDARY SHAFT LF $ 450 $ 148,500 $ - S - $ 148,500 103 2 4160 QA SHAFT TEST EACH $ 2,000 $ 4,000 $ - $ - $ 4,000 STRUCTURE - BNSF ROW $ 1,894,436 $ - $ $ 1,894,436 STRUCTURE - UPRR ROW 104 13,120 7006 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION CLASS B INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 24 $ 314,880 $ - $ - $ 314,880 105 10,890 7008 SHORING OR EXTRA EXCAVATION CLASS B S.F. $ 10 $ 108,900 $ - $ - $ 108,900 106 50 4087 CONSTRUCTING 6 FT. DIAM SHAFT L.F. $ 1,600 $ 80,000 $ - $ - S 80,000 107 15,710 4149 ST. REINF. BAR FOR BRIDGE LB. $ I S 18.852 $ - $ - $ 18,852 Ilfwlsl.ebom.comtProjects_FW1FoderalWay/20161A18.0085\001EnginearingtCoat Estimateloft Sakai Review/Cost Estimate O11 Sakai Comparison Enabted_rlfxlsx 7/9/2018 128 7of12 Item No, Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules 108 5,110 4204 CONC. CLASS 4000W FOR SEAL C.Y. $ 194 $ 989,718 $ - $ - $ 989,718 109 80 4322 CONC. CLASS 4000 FOR BRIDGE C.Y. $ 400 $ 32,000 $ - S - $ 32,000 110 I 4300 SUPERSTRUCTURE L.S. $ 619,129 $ 619,129 $ - $ $ 619,129 III I 4468 CLEANING AND PAINTING L.S. $ 76,000 $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ 76,000 112 1 7037 STRUCTURE SURVEYING L.S. $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ - $ - $ 15,000 113 2,210 XX-29 4 FT DIAM PRIMARY SHAFT LF $ 793 $ 1,751,789 $ - $ - $ 1,751,789 114 2,210 XX-30 4 FT DIAM SECONDARY SHAFT LF $ 523'' $ 1,155,089 $ - $ - $ 1,155,089 115 170 XX-32 D.AMPPROOFING S.Y. $ 35 $ 5,950 $ - $ - S 5,950 116 120 XX-34 WATERPROOFING L.P. $ 30 $ 3,600 $ - $ - $ 3,600 117 9 4160 QA SI-IAFT TEST EACH $ 2,000 $ 18,000 $ - $ - S 18,000 STRUCTURE - UPRR ROW $ 5,188,907 $ - $ - $ 5,188,907 SURFACING 118 119 15,571 7,175 5040 5100 PERMEABLE BALLAST CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE TON TON $ $ 28 23 SURFACING $ 435,988 $ 165,025 $ 601,013 $ S $ 435,988 $ 165,025 $ 601,013 HOT MIX ASPHALT 120 1 8,000 1 5767 IHMA CL. 1/2 IN. PG [ TON I $ 84 $ 672,000 $ - $ - $ 672,000 HOT MLX ASPHALT $ 672,000 $ - $ - $ 672,000 EROSION CONTROL ANI) ROADSIDE PLANTING 121 4 6409 TOPSOIL TYPE C ACRE $ 38,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ - $ 152,000 122 16,200 6419 SEEDING AND FERTILIZING BY HAND S.Y. $ 1 $ 19,440 $ - $ - $ 19,440 123 I 6488 EROSION CONTROL AND WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION L.S. $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ 100,000 EROSION CONTROL AND ROADSIDE PLANTING $ 271,440 $ - $ - $ 271,440 TRAFFIC 124 6,47G 6700 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. $ 52 $ 336,752 $ - $ - $ 336,752 125 622 6701 CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB L.F. $ 36 $ 22,392 $ - $ - $ 22,392 126 134 6707 CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. S 39 $ 5,226 $ - $ - $ 5,226 127 607 6727 EXTRUDED CURB L.P. $ 17 $ 10,319 $ - $ - $ 10,319 128 375 6743 BEAM GUARDRAIL TYPE 1 - 8 FT. LONG POST L.F. S 27 $ 10,125 $ - $ - $ 10,125 129 2 6760 BEAM GUARDRAIL TRANSITION SECTION TYPE EACH $ 4,066 $ 8,132 $ • $ - $ 8,132 \lfwfst.obom.com\Projects FW\FoderaiWay2018V118.0085\00lEngineoring\Cost EstimatelOtt Sakai Review\Cost Estimate Oit Sakai Comporisan_Ennbled rlfxlsx 7/9/2016 129 8 of 12 Item No, Schedule A Dose Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Dose Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Dese Cost Toed All Schedules 130 6 6766 BEAM GUARDRAIL ANCHOR TYPE 10 EACH $ 1,000 $ 6,000 $ - $ - $ 6,000 131 15,430 6806 PAINT LINE L.F. $ 2 $ 23.145 $ - $ - $ 23.145 132 967' 6827 PAINTED WIDE LANE LINE L.F. $ 0 $ 338 $ - $ - $ 338 133 26 6833 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH $ 255 $ 6,630 $ - $ - $ 6,630 134 950 6857 PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. $ 14 $ 13,300 $ - $ - $ 13,300 135 279 6859 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. $ 10 $ 2,790 $ - $ - S 2,790 136 1 6890 PERMANENT SIGNING L.S. $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ - $ - S 7,500 I37 1 6904 ILLUMINATION SYSTEM L.S. $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ 150,000 138 1 6912 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM L.S. $ 893,268 $ 893,268 $ - $ - $ 893,268 139 105 6915 CASING L.F. $ 100 $ 10,500 $ - $ - $ 10,500 140 55 6917 DIRECTIONAL BORING L.F. $ 88 $ 4.840 $ - $ - $ 4,840 141 I 6971 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ 40,000 142 4 7442 PERMANENT IMPACT ATTENUATOR EACI-I $ 28,575 5 114,300. $ - $ - $ 114,300 143 1 XX-08 PEDESTRIAN CONTROL AND PROTECTION L.S. $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000 TRAFFIC $ 1,715,557 $ - $ - $ 1,715,557 \\hvfsl.obam.com/ProJods_F1MFedera/Wayt2018A18.00B5\00/Engineoring\Cast Estimate \Ott Sakai ReviovACaal Estimalo Ott Sakai Comparison Enabled rifxtsx 7/9/2018 130 90112 Item No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. Item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules OTHER ITEMS 144 434 1945 PEDESTRIAN HANDRAIL L.F. $ 200 $ 86,800 $ - $ - $ 86,800 145 34 3110 LOCKING SOLID METAL COVER AND FRAME FOR CATCH BASIN EACH $ 1,075 $ 36,550 $ - $ - $ 36,550 146 1 7003 TYPE B PROGRESS SCHEDULE L.S. $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000 147 l 7037 STRUCTURE SURVEYING L.S. $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ - $ 25,000 148 I 7038 ROADWAY SURVEYING L.S. $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 149 6 7041 BOLLARD TYPE EACH $ 825 $ 4,950 $ - $ - S 4,950 150 2,330 7055 CEMENT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. $ 46 $ 107,180 $ - $ - $ 107,180 151 5 7058 CEMENT CONC. CURB RAMP TYPE EACH $ 4,650 ,$ 23,250 $ - $ - $ 23,250 152 157 7059 CEMENT CONC. DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE S.Y. $ 104 $ 16,328 $ - $ - $ 16,328 153 990 7060 ASPHALT CONC. SIDEWALK S.Y. S 83 $ 82,170 $ - $ - $ 82,170 I54 1,035 7083 CHAIN LINK FENCE TYPE 3 L.P. $ 17 $ 17,078 $ - S - '$ 17,078 155 3 7103 DOUBLE 14 FT. COATED CHAIN LINK GATE EACI-I $ 1,600 $ 4,800 $ - $ - $ 4,800 156 1 7350 CLEANING EXISTING DRAINAGE STRUCTURE L.S. $ 6,000 $ 6,000' $ - $ - $ 6,000 157 II 7360 MANHOLE 48 IN. DIAM. TYPE EACH $ 3,740 $ 41,140 $ - $ - $ 41,140 158 2 7364 MANHOLE 60 IN. DIAM. TYPE EACH $ 5,300. $ 10,600 $ - $ - $ 10,600 I59 I 7480 ROADSIDE CLEANUP EST. $ 35.000 $ 35,000 $ - $ - S 35,000 160 1 7490 TRIMMING AND CLEANUP L.S. $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000 161 1 7500 FIELD OFFICE BUILDING L.S. $ 22,000 $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ 22.000 162 9,300 7530 CONSTRUCTION GEOTEXTILE FOR SEPARATION S.Y. $ 7 $ 65,100 $ - $ - $ 65,100 163 1.206 7559 GEOSYNTHETIC RETAINING WALL S.F. $ 15 $ 13,090 $ - $ - $ 18,090 164 402 7567 GRAVEL BORROW FOR STRUCTURAL EARTH WALL INCL. HAUL C.Y. $ 48 $ 19,296 $ - $ - $ 19,296 165 1 7725 REIMBURSEMENT FOR THIRD PARTY DAMAGE EST. $ 10,000 $ 10.000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 166 I 7728 MINOR CHANGE CALC $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000 167 7731 STEEL COST ADJUSTMENT CALC $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 168 I 7736 SPCC PLAN L.S. $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000. 169 7 9605 CONNECTION TO DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EACH $ 1,640 $ 11,480 S - $ - $ 11,480 170 I 01-07 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) L.S. $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 171 l 01-11 UTILITY POTHOLING L.S. $ 30,000 $ 30,000 $ - $ - S 30,000 172 1 XX-05 DEWATERING SYSTEM L.S. $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 173 2 XX-06 ABANDONMENT OF MONITORING WELLS EACH $ 700 $ 1,400 $ - $ - S 1,400 174 1 XX-09 SETTLEMENT MONITORING - SURVEY L.S. $ 10,000 $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ 10,000 175 26 XX-10 SETTLEMENT PLATES EACH $ 800 $ 20.800 $ - $ - $ 20,300 1 fwfs1.abarn.com\Projects FW\FederalWsyt2016\A18.0085\00lEnglneeringlCost Estimate \Ott Sakai RecowlCost Esttmale_Ott Sakai Comparison_Enabled rlt.atsx 7/9/2018 131 Item No, Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. item No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost - Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules 176 1 XX-11' PROJECT RED LINE DRAWINGS L.S. $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ - $ - $ 2,000 177 1 XX-I2 FIBER OPTIC RELOCATION - WEST SIDE L.S. $ 60,000 $ 60,000 S - $ - $ 60,000 178 1 XX-13 FIBER'OPTICRELOCATION - EAST SIDE L.S. $ 130,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ 130,000 179 1 XX-31 STORM BYPASS EST. $ 15,000 $ 15.000 $ - $ - S 15,000 180 I XX-38 RELOCATE BP GAS LINES L.S. $ 1,000,000 S 1,000,000 $ - S - $ 1,000,000 OTHER ITEMS $ 2,279,012 $ - $ - $ 2,279,012 Subtotal -Ex. Mobc Mobilization Subtotal $ 49,106,521 $ - $ - $ 49,106,521 $ 8,681,105 $ - $ - $ 8,681,105 S 57,787.626 $ - $ - $ 57,787.62E 10af12 I19,4st.abam.camiProJects_FW\FederatWay2018/A18.0085\00\Englneedng\Cast Estimate/Ott Sakai RovievACest Estimato_oa Sakai Compadson_Enabled drxlss 719/2016 132 110112 Item No. Schedule A Desc Quantity Std. hem No. Item Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Desc Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total MI Schedules Tax 0.00% $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Estimated Construction Cost with Mob $ 57,787,626 $ - $ - $ 57,787,626 Design Contingency 5% Market Conditions 0% Estimated Construction Bid Cost/Budget (21118 Dollars) Inllntion Factor (3% per year for 2 years) 3% Estimated Construction Bid Cost/Budget (2020 Dollars) Construction Contingency/Risk 10% Estimated Bid Amount Total Estimated Track shift by UPRR UPRR Flagging UPRR Inspection BNSF Flagging BNSF Inspection BP Design Costs Estimated Total Construction Costs $ 2,889,331 S - $ - $ 2,889,381 $ - $ - S 60,677,007 $ - S - $ 60,677,007 S 3,695,230 $ - $ - $ 3,695,230 $ 64,372,237 $ - S - $ 64,372,237 $ 6,437,223.67 $ - $ - $ 6,437,224 $ 70,809,460 S - $ - $ 70,809,460 $ 682,000 $ 682,000 $ 720,000 $ 720,000 S 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 540,000 $ 540,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 570,000 $ 570,000 $ 73,561,460 $ 73,561,460 \\twfsl.abam.com\Projects FW\FederalWay12018W18.0085100tEngineedng\Cost Estimate\Ott Sakai RevleeACaal Eslimate Ott Sokal Camparlson Enabled_rlfxlso 7/9/2018 133 129112 Item No, Schedule A Desc Quantity Sal, hem No. ttent Description Unit Unit Cost Schedule A Dose Cost Schedule B Desc Cost Schedule C Desc Cost Total All Schedules Estimated ROW & Easement (Misc. Properties) Costs Estimated Engineering & Permitting Costs Estimated Owner/Agency Design Engineering Costs Estimated Construction Admin and Inspection Costs Estimated Total Project Costs $ 1,720,166 $ 1,720,166 $ 3,892,500 $ 3,892,500 $ 607,500 $ 607,500 $ 4,000,000.00 $ 4,000,000 S 83,781,626 $ 83,781,626 ROW & EASEMENTS 1 ROW Acquisition (Past Food Restaurants) EST. $ 191,925 $ - S - $ 191,925 1 Permanent Easements (BP, KC Sewer, outfall, fast food driveways) EST. $ 447,000 $ 447,000 Temporary Construction Easements (BP, KC Sewer, outfall, fast food driveways) EST. $ 668,241 $ 668,241 I Estimated UPRR Penn & Temp Easements EST. $ 330,000 S - S - $ 330,000 1 Estimated BNSF BP & KC Sewer Easements EST. $ 83,000 $ - $ - $ 83,000 Subto al - ROW &Easements $ 1,720,166 '$ - $ - $ 1,720,166 11fwfs1.abam.wm5ProJocts_FW1FederalWay12018W18.0085\5t\EigineeringtCos1 Estimate \Ott Sakai ReviewtCast Estimate Ott Sakai Comparison Enabled_dr.nlsx 7/9/2018 134 Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Minutes November 13, 2018 D. Consultant Agreement: Strander Boulevard Extension Phase 3 Staff is seeking Council approval to move forward with a Value Engineering consultant contract in an amount not to exceed $75,000. Three firms have responded to the RFQ with interviews forthcoming, and Council is being asked for approval now due to time limitations. The project overall continues to have a funding gap of $64M. Advocacy efforts will be made for inclusion of the project in a possible State transportation package. Representatives from the Transportation Improvement Board recommended the City complete Value Engineering as a critical funding strategy. Committee members discussed the project and expressed support for completing Value Engineering as more will be known in 2019 regarding overall project funding. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 19, 2018 REGULAR CONSENT AGENDA. E. Resolution: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Staff is seeking Council approval of a resolution that would adopt a Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program that will provide a predictable and equitable process by which residents can request improvements. The proposed budget currently includes $400,000 which will be shared between traffic calming efforts and other safety improvements identified proactively by staff. The Program distinguishes between types of improvements as Level I or Level II. Level I includes passive treatments that can be implemented quickly. Level II includes physical devices that usually require permanent installation and must be coordinated with Police, Fire, and Council. The Program outlines the request process, preliminary evaluation, solution alternatives, funding, design, construction, evaluation, and removal. Councilmembers discussed the proposal. Councilmember Idan stated he likes the education piece, request process, and levels of response, but feels the requirement of 70% approval by the neighborhood for Level II improvements is too great of a barrier for participation. Staff believes the neighborhood approval is needed so the City knows the investment is truly wanted by the affected residents and not just by a "squeaky wheel." Councilmember Quinn mentioned that he had researched policies in other cities and it is common to have a neighborhood approval mechanism. He likes that it engages the community about the city's investment and provides additional documentation to support a consistent process. The policy provides flexibility on the mailing of ballots, since it may be possible to gauge sufficient interest at a community meeting. Councilmembers discussed the importance of public outreach about the program, including translations. Chair McLeod suggested reducing the approval threshold from 70% to 2/3, and the Committee agreed, although Councilmember Idan asserted he would prefer that the City use a system that would provide the neighborhood an opportunity for protest rather than majority approval. Staff mentioned that this is a new policy for the City and adjustments can be made after lessons learned. Councilmember Idan asked if a resident could submit a new request after already having one fulfilled by the City. The proposed policy does not limit the number of requests that can be made by an individual or group. The Committee expressed concern about overuse of the program creating inequity among neighborhoods and requested language that would restrict new submissions with a certain time period. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL AS AMENDED. FORWARD TO NOVEMBER 26, 2018 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. 135