Laserfiche WebLink
Transportation & Infrastructure Committee Minutes May 21, 2019 <br />E. Ordinance: Amending Solid Waste Utility Tax Rate & Recycling Rate Surcharge <br />Staff is seeking Council approval of an ordinance that would amend Tukwila Municipal Code <br />3.51 to increase the Solid Waste Utility Tax by 10% and a Letter of Understanding with Waste <br />Management for additional services and a 5% Recyclable Cost surcharge. Both changes would <br />impact only commercial customers, not residential. Staff proposes the increase to the Solid <br />Waste Utility Tax because of heavy truck impacts to roads. The current utility tax rate is 6% <br />and has not been adjusted since 2009. The proposal will raise an estimated $750,000 per year <br />which will be intended for road projects. The increase to 16% would be effective 11/1/19. The <br />5% Commercial Recyclable Cost surcharge was negotiated with Waste Management to offset <br />its costs associated with the weakening recycling market as described to the Committee in <br />April. The proposed surcharge would be in place for two years but could be extended in the <br />future. As a tradeoff, Waste Management will begin to pick up 20 additional City -owned <br />garbage containers twice weekly. Tukwila's solid waste and recycling rates will remain below <br />those of neighboring cities even with these proposed increases. Councilmember Kruller asked <br />about specific impacts. At the 1-yard collection level, the rate will increase from $70.80 to <br />$81.78. At the 8-yard level, the rate will go from $424.54 to $490.35. Councilmember McLeod <br />asked how 10% was determined for the tax increase and noted that this is another hit to <br />businesses. Staff looked at the City of Kent as a model, but it will be a Council decision. Chair <br />Idan pointed out that the last recital in the ordinance refers to the money being designated for <br />road maintenance and road related projects, but the language in the code is more general, <br />referring to "City services or capital requirements." He would prefer that money raised from <br />this tax be explicitly directed to road improvements. Councilmember Kruller stated that the <br />intent for roads is clear and she prefers leaving the flexibility in the code. She asked if staff had <br />reached out to the Chamber of Commerce per her suggestion at the last meeting. Staff said <br />the meeting has not yet occurred but will pursue it prior to the Committee of the Whole <br />discussion. Councilmember McLeod asked for clarification on road improvements in the <br />General Fund. The current policy is that the General Fund subsidizes roads and infrastructure <br />projects and while there is not a specific roads account, the city does identify all of its revenues <br />and expenditures. Chair Idan stated again that he is interested in dedicating the proposed 16% <br />Solid Waste Utility Tax to road improvements and he would like the full Council to discuss this, <br />although he will not be present. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO MAY 28, 2019 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. <br />III. SCATBd/RTC <br />There was no report. <br />IV. MISCELLANEOUS <br />McMicken Projects <br />Staff distributed a handout showing projects and expenditures in the McMicken Heights neighborhood <br />between 1989-2019. <br />BNSF Access <br />Chair Idan stated that he would like a Committee discussion schedule for June 18 on the BNSF <br />intermodal access location. He feels the Council should make a decision on the location despite not <br />having a funding strategy determination. <br />