Laserfiche WebLink
2. To the extent Washington's State Environmental Policy Act of 1971 (SEPA), <br />chapter 43.21 C RCW, is applicable, the analysis of environmental impacts from proposed <br />shoreline uses or developments shall be conducted consistent with the rules <br />implementing SEPA (TMC Chapter 21.04 and WAC 197-11). <br />3. For all development, mitigation sequencing shall be applied in the following <br />order of priority: <br />a. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of <br />an action. <br />b. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action <br />and its implementation by using appropriate technology or by taking affirmative steps to <br />avoid or reduce impacts. <br />c. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the <br />affected environment. <br />d. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and <br />maintenance operations. <br />e. Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing <br />substitute resources or environments. <br />f. Monitoring the impact and the compensation projects and taking <br />appropriate corrective measures. <br />4. In determining appropriate mitigation measures applicable to shoreline <br />development, lower priority measures shall be applied only where higher priority <br />measures are determined by the City to be infeasible or inapplicable. <br />5. When mitigation measures are appropriate pursuant to the priority of <br />mitigation sequencing above, preferential consideration shall be given to measures that <br />replace the impacted functions directly and in the immediate vicinity of the impact. <br />However, if mitigation in the immediate vicinity is not scientifically feasible due to <br />problems with hydrology, soils, waves or other factors, then off -site mitigation within the <br />Shoreline Jurisdiction may be allowed if consistent with the Shoreline Restoration Plan. <br />Mitigation for projects in the Transition Zone must take place in the Transition Zone. In <br />the event a site is not available in the Transition Zone to carry out required mitigation, the <br />project proponent may contribute funds equivalent to the value of the required mitigation <br />to an existing or future restoration project identified in the CIP to be carried out by a public <br />agency in the Transition Zone. <br />I. Off Street Parking and Loading Requirements. In addition to the parking <br />requirements in TMC Chapter 18.56, the following requirements apply to all development <br />in the shoreline jurisdiction. <br />1. Any parking, loading, or storage facilities located between the river and any <br />building must incorporate additional landscaping in accordance with TMC Section <br />18.44.060, "Vegetation Protection and Landscaping," or berming or other site planning or <br />design techniques to reduce visual and/or environmental impacts from the parking areas <br />utilizing the following screening techniques: <br />W: Legislative Development\SMP-Zoning Code changes 2-25-20 <br />MD:bjs Review and analysis by Barbara Saxton Page 24 of 64 <br />