City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
TIS 2024-09-23 Item 2D - Contract Amendment #1 - Gilliam Creek Fish Barrier Removal and Habitat Enhancement with Otak
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
City Council Committees Meetings
>
Transportation and Infrastructure Services (2021-Present)
>
Transportation and Infrastructure Services Agenda Packets (2021-Present)
>
2024-09-23 Transportation and Infrastructure Services
>
TIS 2024-09-23 Item 2D - Contract Amendment #1 - Gilliam Creek Fish Barrier Removal and Habitat Enhancement with Otak
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2024 2:40:43 PM
Creation date
9/19/2024 2:37:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Committees
Committees Date (mm/dd/yy)
09/23/24
Committee Name
Transportation and Infrastructure Services 2021-Present
Record Type
Agenda Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
properties will be based on analytical information from publicly available reports and the vegetation type and <br />conditions at the site. If reports can be found with the water chemistry information, assumption will be made <br />based on the known freshwater conditions at the site and factors that can be assigned within the corrosion <br />guidance documents. <br />Otak will consult with a testing provider to determine cost and methods to take core samples of the existing <br />culvert and have the level of corrosion analyzed by a steel materials lab. If the City requests the testing to be <br />performed, a request for authorization of Management Reserve funds will be made to cover the vendor expenses <br />for testing. <br />Otak will assess optional materials for coating or slip -lining of the existing culvert to extend the service life that are <br />compatible with the proposed Alternative 1 flood gate retrofit and fish passage criteria. Criteria to be considered <br />includes SRT/MTR actuator arm installation inside the culvert, aquatic organism compatibility, and abrasion. <br />TASK 6.4 DELIVERABLES <br />• Existing Culvert Condition Assessment and Technology Compatibility - narrative of findings for future Phase II <br />Alternatives Analysis Report (Draft and Final, electronic pdf) <br />TASK 6.4 ASSUMPTIONS <br />• City will provide one list of consolidated comments on the draft narrative of findings for future Phase II <br />Alternatives Analysis Report. Comments will be addressed and incorporated into the narrative. <br />6.5 Alt 1 Retrofit Option Feasibility Study - Integrating STR/MTR <br />Otak will develop schematic design plans for Alternative 1 focusing on retrofitting the existing culvert with a side <br />hinge self-regulating tide gate with muted tidal regulator (SRT MTR). The schematic design plans are estimated to <br />include the following sheets: <br />o Culvert Cross Section and Elevation (depicting MTR actuator integration) <br />o Culvert Inlet Treatment Details integrating MTR float apparatus <br />o Culvert Outlet Details for installing an SRT gate at the existing outlet concrete headwall and <br />apron structure <br />Otak will reach out to a regional manufacturer of side hinge self-regulating tide gate with muted tidal regulators <br />(SRT MTR) to discuss constructability issues related to retrofitting the existing culvert with this technology <br />including issues related to debris interrupting gate function, mitigating design approaches, and anticipated <br />maintenance. A meeting with be conducted with the manufacturer representative, City staff, and Otak engineers <br />including hydraulic and structural engineers. Details of a SRT MTR that can be incorporated into the schematic <br />plans will be requested from the manufacturer. <br />• This task is intended to understand the viability of retrofitting the existing culvert and address the following <br />issues: <br />• Compatibility of MTR actuator arm technology with a 208 LF length of culvert. <br />• Compatibility of slip lining or CIPP technology with MTR actuator technology running inside/on the ceiling <br />of the culvert. <br />• Can the actuator arm be installed in a new, parallel conduit? <br />• What is the risk of debris entanglement on MTR float system. <br />• What is the risk of debris entanglement on the actuator arm if it runs through the culvert the existing <br />culvert? <br />• How much conveyance capacity is reduced with the actuator arm being installed inside the current <br />Otak — Scope of Work <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.