Laserfiche WebLink
PC Public Hearing Minutes <br /> October 25,2012 <br /> • Page 19,Freeway Frontage Corridor type tree spacing requirement will be 30-50 ft, depending on <br /> species. <br /> • Page 22, 18.28.30.A.5—The suggested change would create a lower design review threshold for non- <br /> conforming structures than for conforming structures. Typically when repair costs are more than 10% of <br /> the assessed value it would trigger corridor standards.No change <br /> • Page 29, 18.28.130.A.8—Standard only applies when the transportation impacts of an intensification of <br /> use make the frontage improvements reasonably necessary. Therefore,if a new street and sidewalk were <br /> put in, lighting would be required.No change. <br /> • 30, 18.28.140 Building orientation requirement.Raise the threshold for compliance in existing buildings. <br /> Use a reconstruction threshold similar to what is currently required for non-conforming structures(TMC <br /> 18.70.050).ADD to 18.28.030.0 4. Compliance with building orientation and ground level transparency <br /> is required for existing buildings only if are destroy any means to an extent of more than 50% <br /> of its replacement cost at the time of destruction,in the judgment of the City's Building Official. <br /> • Page 40, 18.28.200 Ground level transparency requirement.Raise the threshold for compliance in <br /> existing buildings.Use a reconstruction threshold similar to what is currently required for non- <br /> conforming structures (TMC 18.70.050).ADD to 18.28.030.0 4.Compliance with building orientation <br /> and ground level transparency, is for existing buildings only, if are destroyed by any means <br /> to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at the time of destruction,in the judgment of the <br /> City's Building Official. <br /> • Page 41, 18.28.220, Special Corner Features—Revision—Remove reference from the Corridor Type <br /> Map and make it optional permitted but not required in the TOD, Regional Center, and Pond districts. <br /> • Page 59, 18.28.260.B.5.b under Parking Reductions. Increase the walking distance from stations for a <br /> parking reduction for residential development. Revision—"Parking requirements for commercial <br /> development within 600 feet of the Sounder transit station or the Tukwila bus Transit Center <br /> residential development within 1,320 feet of either station may be reduced or modified..." <br /> • Page 59, Table 4—Do not reduce parking requirements for dwelling units within 1/4 mile of stations to <br /> only 1 space. Proposed standard has already been lowered from current code requirements. Retain <br /> proposed parking space requirements for dwelling units. <br /> Additional changes to -New Comments Section-Added 10-1-12 <br /> Chapter 18.28 <br /> • Page 18 & 19, Commercial Corridor and the Freeway Frontage Corridor types—change word, <br /> "minimum"to"maximum". Maximum lengths will address the concern of ensuring that the length of <br /> any new or renovated building facade maintains the desired human scale and urban character in <br /> Southcenter. <br /> • Page 7,New Street- south of the pond—Corridor Type changed from"Urban Corridor"to <br /> "Neighborhood Corridor". Add a new footnote to New Thoroughfare Cross-section"New street south <br /> of Tukwila Pond shall only have on-street parking on the south side of the street. Revised corridor <br /> map handed out to the Commissioners. <br /> • Page 7,Nelson Place and S. 156"' St, changed from"Workplace Corridor"to "Neighborhood <br /> Corridor". These streets were incorrectly coded. <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> Commissioner Hansen made a motion to approve the revised Southcenter Subarea Plan, dated <br /> 10/16/2012, and forward the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council for their <br /> review. Commissioner McLeod seconded the motion. All were in favor. <br /> Commissioner Hansen made a motion to approve the revised Southcenter Design Manual, dated <br /> 10/16/2012, and forward the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council for their <br /> review. Commissioner McLeod seconded the motion. All were in favor. <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 2 <br />