City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Planning 2013-04-25- Item 3 - Adoption of 3/28/13 Minutes
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packets
>
2011-2019 Agenda Packets
>
2013-04-25 Planning Commission - Sound Transit Master Sign Program / Comprehensive Plan Update
>
Planning 2013-04-25- Item 3 - Adoption of 3/28/13 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2014 4:08:51 PM
Creation date
4/19/2013 9:29:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Boards and Commissions
Date (mm/dd/yy)
04/25/13
Board or Commission Name
Planning Commission
Agenda or Minutes
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BAR Hearing Minutes <br />March28, 2013 <br />Commissioner Mann <br />stated that she had visited the site and talked to the neighbors. Minnie Dhaliwal asked <br />Commissioner Mann to disclose any ex-parte communications and asked the applicant if he objected to <br />Commissioner Mann hearing the matter. Applicant stated he had no objections. <br />Commissionersasked staff and the applicant some clarifying questions. <br />Commission Mann <br />asked if a new fence along Macadam Road will be installed; expressed concerns with the <br />outdoor storage and screening from the adjacent residential properties; inquired about the height of the <br />parking lot lights; asked if the landscaping along the access roadmet code requirements;and expressed <br />concerns with the noise generated by the refrigerated trucksin the area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Alford <br />expressed concerns with the proposed parking lot trees that are columnar and <br />therefore do not provide much shade. <br />Commissioner Maestas <br />asked about the Type 2 stream; if any grading activities are planned thatwould <br />disturb the contaminated soil; if the stream buffer was designed to mitigate surface toxins from reaching the <br />stream; any offsite impacts from the proposed lights;and if there were any plans to remove the existing trees. <br />Commissioner Strander <br />stated that the original application was for atwo story building and the modification <br />approved in 2008addeda third story, but the current application is only for a two story building; inquired if <br />the planting of the stream buffer was complete; and how the existing trees will be protected during <br />construction. <br />Bob Fadden <br />, the applicant addressed the questions. He stated that due to topography difference of 33 feet <br />from the site to the residential area up abovethere will be a 10 foot high retaining wall that should help screen <br />outdoor storage. He said the owner will not have a problem with planting some evergreens to provide <br />additional screening if that is desired. The Department of Ecology has issued a No Further Action Order for <br />the soil contamination issues.He stated that the enhanced stream buffer helps shade the stream and it would <br />not have been possible if the stream was left in its current state. In 2008 the owner had planned to build apent <br />house on thethird story, butthe current proposal does not include one. There is an underground storm water <br />storage system already in place and includes 8 foot deep settling pond with a filter. The materials stored <br />outside will be placed on crushed rock surfaceand there will be cameras to prevent theft.Regarding the <br />requirement for larger canopy trees he stated that staff has a good handle on the issue, although he would not <br />desire any storm water issues due to a lot of fallen leaves. He also said that theproject would comply with <br />lighting standards. <br />There was no public testimony. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />The BARdeliberatedand decided to take a vote on the specific motions addressing each of the additional <br />conditionsbeing considered.The three additional conditions being considered were: screening from residential <br />properties; parking lot trees; and off site glare from the parking lot lights. <br />Motion #1: Commissioner Strandermade a motion to add a condition to plant five evergreen trees along <br />Macadam Road to provide better screening for the residential homes, provided there is no objection from the <br />property owners.Commissioner Maestas seconded the motion. All were in favor. <br />Motion #2: Commissioner Alford made a motion to add a condition to replace the columnar trees in the <br />parking lot with trees that have a larger canopy, in order to provide more shade, and the landscaping plan to <br />be reviewed by staff as part of the building permit review process.Commissioner Mann seconded the motion. <br />All were in favor <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.