City of Tukwila
My WebLink
|
Help
Search Tips
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Planning 2013-06-27 Item 4 H - Public Hearing: Advisory Committee Meeting Memos and Minutes
COT-City
>
City Clerk
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packets
>
2011-2019 Agenda Packets
>
2013-06-27 Planning Commission - Comprehensive Plan: Natural Environment Element / Shoreline Element
>
Planning 2013-06-27 Item 4 H - Public Hearing: Advisory Committee Meeting Memos and Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2014 4:09:30 PM
Creation date
6/20/2013 10:52:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Boards and Commissions
Date (mm/dd/yy)
06/27/13
Board or Commission Name
Planning Commission
Agenda or Minutes
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Tukwila Tree and Environment Advisory Committee <br />Meeting Notes <br />Meeting 2, November 1, 2012 <br />Committee Members in Attendance: Sean Albert, Nancy Eklund, De'Sean Quinn (arrived 6:40 p.m.), <br />Stephen Reilly, Don Scanlon, David Shumate, Heidi Watters, Kathleen Wilson <br />Committee Members Absent: Christian Faltenberger <br />Members of the Public in Attendance: Daryl Tapio, Sharon Mann <br />Staff in Attendance: Carol Lumb, Sandra Whiting <br />The meeting began at 6:05 p.m. <br />Topics of Discussion: <br />1. Brief introductions of committee members and staff, members of the public in attendance. <br />2. Public comment: (Time will be set aside at the beginning of each meeting for brief public <br />comments; the Committee is meeting in work session format, therefore, questions or <br />comments from the public that come up during the course of the meeting should be directed to <br />staff via e-mail or telephone calls after the meeting.) <br />There was no public comment <br />3. Powerpoint presentation by Linden Lampman, Urban and Community Forestry Specialist for <br />Washington State Department of Natural Resources. A copy of her powerpoint will be posted on <br />the City's Urban Forestry web page and provided to the Committee members. Ms. Lampman <br />provided background information on urban forestry and the importance of having an urban <br />forestry program and she discussed the benefits of trees, including the social, environmental, <br />and economic benefits. Ms. Lampman provided some resource materials to the Committee <br />including: an article called "The Case for Large Trees vs. Small Trees; a brochure on Trees and <br />Parking Lots, and a brochure on "How to Prevent Tree /Sign Conflicts ". The Committee <br />exchanged questions and comments with Ms. Lampman, including: <br />• Getting away from a linear planting approach, and considering grouping of trees, especially <br />where there are space limitations — as well as not using only one or two types of trees for <br />street plantings — when a tree disease strikes, you can lose a substantial amount of your tree <br />canopy; <br />• Making sure underground utility lines are identified on landscape plans to avoid tree <br />root /pipe conflicts; <br />• Being mindful of where trees are planted - right tree (try developing approved tree lists for <br />various site conditions), right place — to avoid conflicts between structures and trees, <br />particularly during storm events; <br />• Trees and parking lots — the type and amount of trees required can depend on whether the <br />parking lot is serving commercial or industrial uses and conflicts between trees and lighting <br />can be minimized by carefully locating lights away from tree islands or installing lower lights <br />that won't be shaded by large trees; <br />• Urban areas are not a native setting — use of native trees falls in the "right tree -right place" <br />category — native trees are often too big for urban areas or the environmental conditions do <br />not support what native trees require; <br />• Using incentives to preserve trees is good policy <br />• Using structural soils for trees in parking lots or for street trees can allow for larger trees in <br />smaller planting spaces. <br />CL Page 1 of 2 11/13/2012 4:58 PM <br />W:\ \Long Range Projects \Urban Forestry\Advisory Committee Materials \Meeting Notes 11 -1 -12 <br />99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.