Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 6505 - Time DC - Additionf. 1 TIME DC. P#6 ED - a - - a �v g- Bedford Properties a 241 -1103 4DDRESS 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107, Seattle, WA ZIP 98168 CONTRACT ®R SSG Corporation PHONE 367 -9393 ADDRESS P.O. Box 33978, Seattle, WA ZIP 98133 NA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # SSGCO * *249J8 EXP. DATE 5_28 - 91 ARCHITECT David Kehle, Architect PHONE 433 -8997 ADDRESS 12878 Interurban Avenue South, Seattle, WA ZIP 98168 - • • . : V it c ` year 1988 SETBACKS: N- S - E- W-- FIRE PROTECTION: 0Sprinklers Q Detectors ® N/A UTILITY PERMITS REQUIRED? Yes 670 No t- rou. . ,, II ?ONING: BAR/LAND USE CONDITIONS? Q Yes ED No :ONDITIONS 01 or than those not . on or attached to 'omit/. Ians v. NPFROVED • - 11 - SSUANCE BY: OFFICIAL i DATE: _ I hereby certify that I have read and examine his permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of lay and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. I am authorized to sign for and obtain this building permit. . /. DATE: ? -. �'-- f / SIGNATURE: 4v..._.1/ PRINT NAME: ; /> = .i c - -I COMPANY: +. , , :ITV OF TUKWILA )ept. of Community Development- Building Division 300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 ?06) 431 -3670 3UILDING - PERMIT NO. )ATE ISSUED: 31T ADDRESS ROJECT NAME/TENANT OAR SQUARE OCC. SQUARE FEET LOAD . FEET 'OTAL B PERMIT (POST WITH INSPECTION CARD AND PLANS IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION) DESCRIPTION: BUILDING PERMIT FEE ; PLAN CHECK BUILDING SURCHARGE: 35.00 3.50: 92:50 : >: S a g =89' PLAN CHECK NO.: 89 -094 PROJECT irir0RMATION S UITE # VALUE OF CON TR C I • N - S 3,000.00 12855 48 Av S Time D.C. TYPE OF U New Building U Addition U Tenant Improvement (commercial) U Demolition (building) U Grading/Fill WORK: 0 Rack Storage Q Reroof 0 Remodel (residential) 0 Other: DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE: Add a non - bearing plywood wall enclosure at end of remaining building from demolition permit. ASSESSOR ACCOUNT # 000480-0013-04 CODE .;;COM.PLIANCE OCC. SQUARE OCC. LOAD. FEET LOAD SQUARE _FEET OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. TOTAL LOAD SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCC. WAD This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days fom the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days from the last:Inspectlbn. CERTIFICATE OF (� DATE ISSU D: OCCUPANCY NO. 1_V PERMIT NO. CONTACTED In 046hCK_ DATE READY DATE NOTIFIED 5 _ 1, q \ ll Bnit.)- PERMIT EXPIRES 2nd NOTIFICATION cf� ` "mo o BY: ,�p� (init.) BY: ) AMOUNT OWING 3RD NOTIFICATION PLAN CHECK NUMBER 3a Q Q INSTRUCTIONS TO STAFF • Contacts with applicants or requests for information should be summarized in writing by staff so that any time the status of the project may be ascertained. • Plan corrections shall be completed and approved prior to sending on to the next department. • Any conditions or requirements for the permit shall be noted on the plans or summarized concisely in the form of a formal letter or memo, which will be attached to the permit. • Please fill out your section of the tracking chart completely. Where information requested is not applicable, so note by using "N /A ". BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE/OCCUPANCY INFORMATION (to be filled out by Plan Checker) FL SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCC. LOAD SQUARE OCC. FEET LOAD SQUARE FEET SQUARE FEET OCC. LOAD OCC. LOAD SQUARE FEET OCC. LOA TOTAL D SQUARE FEET TOTAL OCC, LOAD DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW "X" In box Indicates which departments need to review the project. QUIREMEN • DEPARTMENT. DATE i 181 BUILDING - initial review FIRE O PLANNING O PUBLIC WORKS O OTHER isz BUILDING - final review REVIEW COMPLETED BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TRACKING PROJECT NAME SITE ADDRESS /5T W ' au 5 D ATE:: PROV Z -2ZZ- I 1 ?4? (ROUTED) 2--22 -gtl I INIT INIT: INIT: INIT: "3r7r INIT: CONSULTANT: Date Sent - FIRE PROTECTION prInkiers FIRE DEPT. LETTER DATED: ZONING: -J BAR/LAND USE CONDITIONS? Yes - TNo REFERENCE FILE NOS.: MINIMUM SETBACKS: N- S- UTILITY PERMITS REQUI Yes PUBLIC WORKS LETTER DATED: TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN SUITE NO. ME Date Approved - INSPECTOR: N/A w- UBC EDITION (year): /QSy5 SITE ADDRESS , 1 2 ' Ne , 7. # VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION - $ �-// , 00 PROJ NAME/TENANT 1 11 Ie 7. U • ASSESSOR 6 ACCOUNT 'C # TYPE OF U New Building U Addition U Tenant Improvement (commercial) U WORK: U Rack Storage 0 Reroof 0 Remodel (residential Ig Other: D :molition (•ulIdi • .) fad RI .J.&s4.14 .! a DESCRIBE ORK TO BE DONE: t;7 b NCH — hIC 04(2 cp v a mt --IcI rt.11 t VII. Ci OM WAD t, I bt 17 WOLI.• } tZ ' yf BUILDING USE (office, warehouse, etc.) \ /1 I NQL nk- - NATURE OF BUSINESS: 131 a llt otoc r .1 y e _ WILL THERE BE A CHANGE IN USE ? No 0 ✓ Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: SQUARE FOOTAGE - Building: Tenant Space: Area of Construction: WILL THERE B STORAGE OR USE OF FLAMMABLE, COMBUSTIBLE OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN THE BUILDING? No 0 Yes IF YES, EXPLAIN: PROPERTY OWNER �1� i'Io fil ls at on rag PHONE (,,,1 ADDRESS 7 w _. . t200 t)E • /,2), n a ZIF 0 tej 11� CONTRACTOR l PHONE, % x0-7"61 4 e ., ADDRESS p r 2 p7-j4 - 7 9 2 ZIP i WA. ST. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE # /76�� ; N EXP. DATE i ,) 7. , 2 , ) ) E ARCHITECT 11:7 b'CL' PHONE ,* " pl7 ADDRESS ' 25 7 I 1415 u j.41 Ate /1-_, s my-,A--1, ZIwil D (Q CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 433 -1849 APPLICATION MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY CONTACT PERSON D ATE APPLICATION ACCEPTED 5 BUILDIM3 PERMIT APPLICATION Division FEES (for staff use only) A MO. T:: • a 'DESCRIP.T ON : BUILDING:! PERMIT: FEE PLAN ::;CHECK:: FEE BUILDING. SURCHARGE ENERGY>«SURCHARGE <' OTHER. TOTAL :: RCPT:. # DATE A : r .4r IIt ei...� C, 1 r► !., r 1 rarammimm CITY /ZIP PHONE Aff RR BUILDING OWNER OR AUTHORIZED AGENT SIGNATUR PRINT NAM ADDRESS : EXAMIN E I I EMPIWO � :� PLY FOR 11 T1 DATE PHONE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL In order to ensure that your application is accepted for plan review, please make sure to fill out the application completely and follow the plan submittal checklist on the reverse side of this form. Handouts are available at the Building counter which provide more detailed information on application and plan submittal requirements. Application and plans must be complete in order to be accepted for plan review. VALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION Valuation for new construction and additions are calculated by the Department of Community Development prior to application submittal. Contact the Permit Coordinator at 433 -1851 prior to submitting application. In all cases, a valuation amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed and is subject to possible revision by the Building Division to comply with current fee schedules. BUILDING OWNER / AUTHORIZED AGENT If the applicant is other than the owner, registered architect/engineer, or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter from the property owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required as part of this submittal. EXPIRATION OF PLAN REVIEW Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire by limitations. The building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the applicant as defined in Section 304(d) of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. If you have any questions about our process or plan submittal requirements, please contact the Department of Community Development Building Division at 433 -1849. DATE APPLICATION EXPIRES 03/30/80 SOMITTAL CHECKLIST COMMERCIAL . . . . . .. . . . . . .„.: . ,Corapleted.Obilding . Two set (2) of th : g: Str Occtursi•caleUiations stamped by a Washington State licensed [s0i15 report Starnpodbya„±mishipb.soto • • Topo surve • E Energy calculations stamped by a Washington State Ilcen sod .engineer or.architeet •••••••••••••••• E Legal doscripuon . . . • : •Watkirio'ckamiiiii;:iitathpbci by a :WathiegtOnlStatelkeeSed - architect, which indude : ::' ) ••••••••• : ::::•■..E.Ite: plan . . . . a Aribhitclotural drawings • • • • Mechanical drawings • Elevations .1,Completed ulifity permit application (one tot x(6}setsofcIvll drawings . •••• • Noto:::. See utility permit application checklist foi..sPeOfffelit4re* ....... .. : • ..• RACK L . ..„‘„ ............. leted permit appflcatior plape„.... Two (2 sets floor plan showing be located • Exit doors space floor plan ehawing..resic:storoge,layout;:eirileali 1 . • , • RESIDENTIAL • . . . ...„ . .. . ....... StnicitiralLtalculationiataiiieed by e.WashitiglOkSteteliCeris • :.•7•: • ::e stora9e .81 and. •:.. . .. .. . .......................................... . . . . . • NEW .SINGLEFAMILY..DWELLINGf3/ADDMONS:::1:;:::::::':::::::::::.; • .. Completed building permit Fipplication E Legal description El] Two sots (2) of working drawings, which include ' ': •. • : : • Site plan . • :••!. Foundadort plan.. .. . : : :' '•:. ' ■ Floor plan *Roof plari .• •,. .:. •••...• , : ., : • • ::::. •• : • Building elevations (all.vievrs).,:: fl • :: :::•• • :"■130.1kOng cross-section • Structural framing plans , , ...... ... ... • 886. ' ••• • - : : :...:::: ...:, . „ " • : •-. .:. : : , , . , fl Washington State Energy Code data Completed utility permit applicatidn ED Six (6) sets of site plans showing utilities . . • Note: Budding site plan and utility site plan may be coMbined. 'See . utility permit application and checklist for specific SUbTittill requirements...... Acklitional topographical and soils information may be requkyd if (Mier urs . . site conditions, . .. „ . . • REROOF.... : ..•.: Completed euilcing• permit application One for each structure) •,. • • Natiative describiejoillSling rooli:,*ieterial'Oeingre4Sived, and . certification letter prior iinaiin eCti on and signoft.::: " ..„.. „ ..... . . • . . Completed building permit application Two (2) sets of plans, which Include • ••• • ••••• • Site Plan (showing building and location of tentieisatellite •Detalle.ilintentideritell40:4lsbandrethad �t altecimen Stnictural calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed Completed building permit application (one for each structure) •:.: , • ••: • : -• • •• • • Narrative dotcribingiexisiirtg.roof;: Material being removed, and • • : • : Materiel . being Installed . .• . . , Note A certification letter is required prior to final Inspection arid sign-off of:the permit. • P--arry\Alt t 05 RECEIVED CITY OFTI1KWILA FLti 1 PERMIT CENTER REPORT. ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION OF SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION FORMER TIME -DC TRUCK TERMINAL FOR BEDFORD PROPERTIES Geo , Engineers Bedford Properties, Inc. 12870 Interurban Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168 Attention: Mr. Joe Layman Mr. Bob Hart We are submitting two copies of our technical report regarding the assessment and remediation of subsurface petroleum - related contamination at the former Time -DC truck terminal in Tukwila, Washington. Our services were authorized by Mr. Joe Layman on February 14, 1989. We appreciate the opportunity to be of continued service to Bedford Properties. Please call if you have any questions regarding this report. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. James A. Miller Principal JHB:JAM: cc: Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office 4350 - 150th Avenue N.E. Redmond, WA 98052 -5301 Attn: Mr. Joseph Hickey File No. 1199 - 007 -B04 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. NE, Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone (206) 746 -5200 Fax. (206) 746.5068 oitrAtatIMMVIVIMIVMArtIVANIft March 5, 1990 Consulting Geotechnical Engineers and Geologists Geo Vii`! Engineers INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE SITE CONDITIONS 2 SURFACE CONDITIONS AND DRAINAGE 2 SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 3 GROUND WATER CONDITIONS 3 PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION 4 GENERAL 4 SOIL CONTAMINATION 5 GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION 6 FREE PETROLEUM PRODUCT 7 SITE REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES 7 CONCLUSIONS 10 LIMITATIONS 10 List of Figures VICINITY MAP 1 SITE PLAN 2 SITE PLAN AND GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS • 3 SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS 4 FIELD EXPLORATIONS A -1 BORINGS A -1 REMEDIAL EXCAVATION A -3 MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION A -3 GROUND WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM A -4 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS A -4 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS LOGS OF MONITOR WELLS T A B L E O F CONTENTS APPENDIX A List of Appendix A Figures Page No. 1 1 Figure No. Page No. A -4 Figure No, A -1 A -2 A -3 & A -4 Geo * - ; Engineers and remediation of subsurface petroleum - related contamination at the site of the former Time -DC Truck Terminal in Tukwila, Washington. The former truck terminal facility is located south of the Duwamish River and north of the intersection between 48th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South. The site location and surrounding features are shown in Figure 1. The general layout of the site is shown on Figure 2. The former truck terminal facility included 15 underground steel tanks used for the storage of diesel, gasoline, lubricating oil and waste oil. These tanks included ten 20,000 - gallon diesel tanks, two 10,000- gallon diesel tanks, one 10,000 gallon gasoline tank, one 10,000 gallon lube oil tank and a 5,000 gallon waste oil tank. The underground tanks were removed from the site during February 1989. The locations of the former tanks are shown in Figure 2. Soil contaminated by petroleum products and free (floating) product consisting of diesel fuel were encountered during removal of the underground storage tanks. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of our services was to monitor the tank removal activities, explore and evaluate the extent of subsurface petroleum-related REPORT ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION OF SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION FORMER TIME-DC TRUCK TERMINAL FOR. BEDFORD PROPERTIES INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our services during the assessment pe: FV 1y Geo Engineers contamination, develop recommendations for remedial measures and monitor the remedial activities at the site. The scope of services completed during this project includes:. 1. Monitor the removal of the fifteen underground storage tanks. 2. Subcontract and monitor the drilling of eight exploratory borings and the installation of monitor wells in each boring. 3. Develop recommendations for remedial actions and monitor the remedial program. 4. Collect soil and ground water samples from each boring /monitor well and from the excavation completed for removal of the tanks and contaminated soil. 5. Subcontract the analysis of the soil and ground water samples for the presence of petroleum - related contamination. SITE CONDITIONS SURFACE CONDITIONS AND DRAINAGE The general layout of the former Time -DC truck facility is shown in Figure 2. The facility included a corrugated metal building, fifteen underground storage tanks and three fuel pump islands prior to the remedial activities. The underground storage tanks and fuel pump islands were removed from the site as part of the remedial program. The western portion of the corrugated metal building included remote fueling lines and truck maintenance facilities. The western portion of the building was demolished and removed from the site during the remedial program. The site is bordered by the Duwamish River along the eastern property line. The surface of the site is relatively level and is covered by asphaltic concrete pavement outside of the limits of the remedial irn 2 Geo W : Engineers excavations and building footprint. Runoff from precipitation is collected in a storm drain system and is pumped to the Duwamish River. Runoff from areas where remedial activities were conducted was diverted to a Metro sewer line. SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS Information pertaining to subsurface soil conditions was obtained by drilling eight borings (MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -9) at the locations indicated in Figure 3 and observing conditions in the excavation completed for the removal of the underground storage tanks and petroleum- contaminated soil. Details of the field exploration program and the boring logs for MW -8 and MW -9 are presented in Appendix A of this report. The logs for MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -7 are given in our reports dated April 18, 1989 and May 23, 1989. Boring MW -3 was completed by Geraghty & Miller, Inc. Two general soil units were observed in the remedial excavation and borings at the site. The uppermost soil unit consists of 8 to 10 feet of brown to gray interbedded silt, silty sand and sand. The lowermost unit consists of black fine to medium sand. The base of the black sand was not encountered in the excavation or the borings. Numerous horizontal tree logs, ranging from 1 to 4 feet in diameter and up to 100 feet in length, were encountered in the lower soil unit. GROUND WATER CONDITIONS Ground water conditions at the site were explored by constructing wells (MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -9) in each of the borings completed by GeoEngineers. Construction details for MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -7 are given in our reports dated April 18, 1989 and May 23, 1989. Construction Geo 0! Engineers details for MW -8 and MW -9 are given in Appendix A of this report. Well MW -3, installed by Geraghty & Miller, Inc., was included in our field measurements to provide additional information pertaining to ground water conditions beneath the site. Ground water was encountered at depths of approximately 11 to 14 feet below the ground surface. Water level measurements conducted on June 12, 1989 indicate that the shallow ground water beneath the site generally flows northeastward toward the Duwamish River. Water table elevations at each well on June 12, 1989 are shown in Figure 3. Water table contours based on interpretation of the June 12, 1989 measurements are also shown in Figure 3. PETROLEUM- RELATED CONTAMINATION GENERAL Subsurface petroleum- contaminated soil was detected during the removal of the fifteen underground storage tanks from the site. The tanks were removed between February 15 and February 22, 1989 by Gaston Brothers Excavating. Free (floating) petroleum product was detected on the water table in portions of the excavation completed for removal of the tanks. The extent of subsurface contamination at the site by petroleum products was evaluated by: 1. Physical examination of soil samples for visual indications of petroleum contamination. 2. Conducting field sheen tests on the soil samples. 3. Sampling the well casings for presence of free (floating) petroleum products. 4 i�: Geo 40Engineers for soil in Table The 4. Analyzing soil SOIL CONTAMINATION Soil samples were collected from beneath the tanks during the tank removal program and analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes (BETX). The concentrations of TPH and BETX detected in the soil samples collected during the tank removal program generally exceeded Ecology's cleanup guidelines for underground petroleum storage tanks. The analytical results during the excavation phase of the remedial program. The remedial program is described in a later section of this report. Soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and submitted for analysis of the presence of TPH and BETX. The locations from which soil samples were collected from the excavation are shown in Figure 4. The analytical results for soil samples from the excavation are summarized in Table 2. Excavation of soil continued until the concentration of petroleum- related contaminants in the remaining soil were less than Ecology's cleanup guidelines. The limits of the excavation are shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4. Soil samples were also collected from MW-1 through MW -9 and submitted for analysis of the presence of TPH, BETX and /or fuel hydrocarbons. The analytical results for soil samples from the borings are summarized in ��'}�,; s...sM. urfra'MJ�. w ��i,�. � � � and ground water samples from the remedial excavation and the borings /wells for the presence of petroleum - related contamination. The laboratory data are presented in Appendices B, C and. D. samples collected during the tank removal program are summarized 1. extent of the petroleum- contaminated soil was evaluated primarily s 1. Geo 40, Eng Table 3. Petroleum - related contaminants were not detected in the soil samples from MW -1, MW -2, MW -3 and MW -5 through MW -9. TPH was detected at a concentration of 6.3 ppm in the soil sample from MW -4. BETX and fuel hydrocarbons were not detected in the soil sample from MW -4. GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION Ground water samples were collected from MW -1 through MW -9 and submitted for analysis of TPH and BETX. The analytical results for the ground water samples from the wells are summarized in Table 4. Petroleum - related contaminants were not detected or were detected at concentrations much less than drinking water quality standards in the ground water samples from MW -1 through MW -9. Ground water samples were also collected from the remedial excavation and from a temporary recovery well that was installed in the remedial excavation. The analytical results for the ground water samples from the excavation and recovery well are summarized in Table 5. Petroleum- related contaminants were detected at concentrations greater than drinking water quality standards in the ground water samples collected from the excavation during the initial portion of the remedial program. Petroleum- contaminated soil and free product were present in the excavation during the initial portion of the remedial program. Petroleum - contaminated soil and free product were removed from the excavation as part of the remedial program. Petroleum- related contaminants were generally not detected, or were detected at concentrations less than drinking water quality standards, in the ground water samples collected from the excavation during the later portion and after completion of the remedial excavation. r 6 r�* Geo pEn FREE PETROLEUM PRODUCT Free (floating) product was encountered during removal of the underground storage tanks. Analysis of petroleum product present in the excavation indicated that the product was diesel fuel. SITE REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES Gaston Brothers Excavating excavated approximately 14,500 cubic yards of soil contaminated by petroleum products between February 15 and May 26, 1989. The limits of the excavation are shown in Figure 4. The excavated soil was stockpiled on -site. Free product and contaminated soil were found to extend horizontally beneath the western portion of the terminal building. A portion of the of the building was demolished during March 1989 to remove the contaminated soil and free product beneath the building. As described above, soil samples were collected from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and submitted for analysis of the presence of TPH and BETX. Excavation of soil continued until the concentration of petroleum- related contaminants in the remaining soil were less than Ecology's cleanup guidelines. Ecology's petroleum cleanup guidelines at the time of the site remedial work are summarized below. PARAMETER CONCENTRATION Benzene 660 ppb Toluene 143 ppm Ethylbenzene 14 ppm Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 200 ppm Free product that was encountered in the excavation was recovered with the use of a product recovery well and by skimming product from the water Geok,jEngineers surface with vacuum trucks operated by Environmental Transport, Inc. and Northwest EnviroService, Inc. The majority of the free product was recovered by skimming the surface of the water in the excavation with a boom and removing it with the vacuum trucks. Water and product that was removed from the excavation with the vacuum trucks was transported to ChemPro's facility for disposal. Water that was pumped from the recovery well was discharged to a Metro sewer line (Minor Discharger Permit No. 154). Contaminated soil that was removed from the excavation was subjected to a thermal treatment process by Olympus Environmental, Inc. The soil was treated between July 5, 1989 and October 5, 1989. The thtTmal treatment process involved the removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from the soil by the application of heat followed by treatment of the exhaust gases. The treatment plant consisted of a diesel -fired rotary kiln with facilities to control air emissions. Soil was conveyed to the kiln where the petroleum hydrocarbons were volatilized and partially incinerated. The exhaust gas treatment plant included a bag house and wet scrubber to reduce the emission of dust and volatile hydrocarbons. Olympus Environmental monitored the effectiveness of the thermal treatment process by collecting soil samples at a frequency of about one sample per 240 cubic yards of treated soil. These soil samples were analyzed to determine the concentration of TPH remaining in the soil after treatment. The analytical results are given in Appendix D and summarized in Table 6. The concentrations of TPH detected in the treated soil averaged less than 50 ppm and did not exceed 100 ppm. Ecology's current cleanup guideline for TPH is established at 200 ppm. 8 Geo !Engineers GeoEngineers also collected samples of the treated soil to monitor the effectiveness of the treatment process. Samples were collected by GeoEngineers at a frequency of about one sample per 1,850 cubic yards of treated soil. These soil samples were analyzed to determine the concentrations of TPH, BETX and fuel hydrocarbons remaining in the soil after treatment. The analytical results are given in Appendix D and summarized in Table 7. The analytical results for the samples collected by GeoEngineers were generally similar to the results obtained by Olympus Environmental and indicated that the concentration of petroleum- related contaminants remaining in the treated soil were less than Ecology's cleanup guidelines. Comparison of the concentrations of TPH before and after treatment indicates that the thermal treatment percent of the petroleum product from the soil. The remedial excavation was backfilled with base of the excavation to about one foot above the water table. The crushed concrete was obtained from a recycling plant. The remaining portion of the excavation was backfilled with treated soil. A layer of woven geotextile fabric was placed over the crushed concrete prior to placement of the treated soil. Approximately 1,000 cubic yards of oversized material (cobbles, concrete and wood) were removed from the soil prior to treatment. The oversized material was transported to the Newcastle Landfill for disposal. An additional 400 cubic yards of soil that was not subjected to the thermal treatment process was transported to the Ceder Hills Landfill for disposal. Permission for disposal of the untreated soil and oversized material granted by the King County Health Department prior to disposal. 9 process removed about 98 crushed concrete from the +r - '" r:=r�e �r -rx +r zr r,�"�s.', � '!^. �«r,',r+ � .�--• n• apt was Geoff ! Engineers CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of our field observations and analytical testing, it is our opinion that actions to mitigate subsurface petroleum- related contamination in the vicinity of the former underground storage tanks at the Time -DC facility have been completed successfully. On -site observations and chemical analysis of soil and ground water samples indicate that no petroleum - related contamination of regulatory significance remains in the vicinity of the former underground storage tanks. LIMITATIONS We have prepared this report for use by Bedford Properties. This report may be made available to regulatory agencies. This " report is not intended for use by others and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. Our interpretation of soil conditions during remediation is based on field observations and chemical analytical data. It is always possible that areas with undetected contamination may exist in portions of the site which were not excavated or analyzed. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with generally accepted practices in this area at the time the report was prepared. No other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. o 0 0 10 Geo `=,:; Engineers Please call if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. John H. Biggane Associate JHB :JAM :sd Two copies submitted / 444'444 James A. Miller, P.E. Principal .. ,.+. ' ��` ��P:', yY,fit�?7�Y,� "'�,Rr�'"'''...'..+ N ..� v�.- ? , ' '� . , �.sji ���Y�' �y�n'" �; �, 5 :.� %"r,�'.€�,�•�,.d�G",�'.+�+(4 rah, ,�' *. tJ e. ,.. �.va;u i •.. �? „f.. � �. .. .....��k�nx_Ctf� ?�. a - :fix w_ �� r t.. .m .t4i.• r. of i s..K..b,�cesz TABLE 1 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING TANK REMOVAL PAGE 1 OF 2 CD C r n CD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled 418.1(2) ppm TLC(3) ppm Comments(4) Tank #1 - 1 2/15189 <50 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #1 Tank #1 - 2 2/15/89 <50 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #1 Tank #2 -1 2115189 <50 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #2 Tank #2 - 2 2/15189 <50 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #2 Tank #3 - 1 2/15/89 <50 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #3 Tank #3 - 2/15/89 130 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #3 Tank #4 - 1 2/15/89 16.000 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #4 Tank #4 - 2 2/15/89 <50 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #4 Tank #5 -1 2/15/89 21,000 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #5 Tank #5 - 2 2/15/89 6,100 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #5 Tank #6 - 1 2/23/89 84 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #6 Tank #6 -2 2123189 110 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #6 Tank #7 - 1 2/23/89 8.1 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #7 Tank #7 - 2 2/23/89 110 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #7 Tank #8 -1 2/23/89 34 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #8 Tank #8 - 2 2/23/89 760 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #8 Tank #9 -1 2/23/89 57 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #9 Tank #9 - 2 2/23/89 220 -- -- -- -- -- East end Tank #9 Tank #10 - 1 2/23/89 1,500 -- -- -- -- -- West end Tank #10 Tank #10 -2 ( 2/23/89 1,500 -- -- -- I _ I -- East end Tank #10 ' Notes: CO Sample Numbers "Tank #1 -1" through "Tank #15 -2" were collected by Gaston Brothels Excavating: Sample Numbers "T -1" through "T -9" were collected by GeoEngineers. .: (2)_EPA Method 418.1 (3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy method (4) Tank locations shown in Figure 2 ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; : -- = not tested: Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks. TABLE 1 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING TANK REMOVAL PAGE 1 OF 2 CD C r n CD TABLE 1 (CONTINUED) PAGE 2 OF 2 Notes: (1) Sample Numbers. "Tank #1 -1" through 'Tank #15 -r . were collected by Gaston Brothers Excavating; : 'ISa rnple Numbers "T -1 " through "T -9': were Collected by GeoEngineers. (2) EPA Method 418.1 (3)Thin -layer chromotagraphy method (4) Tank locations shown in Figure 2 ppm = parts per million: ppb = parts per billion: not tested: Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks. G7 CD C t � cry CD CD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled 418.1(2) ppm TLC(3) ppm Comments(4) Tank #11 - 1 2/27189 119 -- -- -- -- -- North end Tank #11 Tank #11 - 2 2/27/89 6090 -- -- -- -- -- South end Tank #11 Tank #12 - 1 2/27/89 7310 -- -- -- -- -- North end Tank #12 Tank #12 -2 2/27/89 19,900 -- -- -- -- -- South end Tank #12 Tank #13 - 2/27/89 -- -- 540 34,000 34.000 20,000 North end Tank #13 Tank #13 - 2 2127/89 -- -- <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <3.0 South end Tank #13 Tank #14 - 1 2/20/89 11,200 -- -- -- -- -- North end Tank #14 Tank #14 - 2 2/20/89 22,300 -- -- -- -- -- South end Tank #14 Tank #15 - 2/20/89 18,000 -- • -- -- -- -- North end Tank #15 Tank #15 2/20/89 81,500 -- -- -- -- -- South end Tank #15 T -1 2/15189 5.0 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #2 T -2 2/15/89 240 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #4 7 I i i ) ui) 2/17/89 30,000 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #11 2/17/89 6,600 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #13 2/20/89 140,000 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #14 2/23/89 940 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #9 T-7 2/23/89 16 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #7 T - 8 2/23/89 68 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #6 T - 9 2/28/89 920 -- -- -- -- -- Center Tank #11 TABLE 1 (CONTINUED) PAGE 2 OF 2 Notes: (1) Sample Numbers. "Tank #1 -1" through 'Tank #15 -r . were collected by Gaston Brothers Excavating; : 'ISa rnple Numbers "T -1 " through "T -9': were Collected by GeoEngineers. (2) EPA Method 418.1 (3)Thin -layer chromotagraphy method (4) Tank locations shown in Figure 2 ppm = parts per million: ppb = parts per billion: not tested: Soil samples collected from beneath the tanks. G7 CD C t � cry CD CD TABLE 2 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING THE REMEDIAL EXCAVATION PAGE 1 OF 6 ( 1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4 (2) EPA Method 4181 (3) Thin-layer chromatagraphy meth ( Additional . soil exca _ from this area after sample wascollected Area was resampled after additionat:excavation • pp = parts per million ppb =parts per billion, =not lasted C7 CD C CD CD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled Depth Interval 418.1(2) ppm TLC(3) ppm Comments T - 10 4/26/89 12 -13 , 1.3 -- <290 <280 1600 1200 T -11 4/26/89 12 -13 26 -- <280 <280 <280 <560 T -12 4/26/89 12 -13 <1.0 -- <300 <300 <300 <600 • T -13 4/26/89 13 -14 1.3 -- <260 <260 <260 <520 T - 14 4/26/89 14 -15 110 -- <280 <280 <280 <560 T -15 4/26/89 13 -14 <1.0 -- <260 <260 <280 <520 T - 16 4/26/89 14 -15 2 -- <270 <270 <270 <540 T -17 4/26/89 13 -14 12 -- <290 <290 <290 <580 T -18 4/26/89 12 -13 <1.0 -- <290 <290 <290 <580 T -19 4/27/89 15 -16 6.5 -- <290 <290 <290 <580 T - 20 4/27/89 14 -15 <2 -- <280 <280 <280 <560 T - 21 5/04/89 15 -16 46 -- -- -- -- -- T 5/04/89 15 -16 100 -- -- -- -- -- T 5/04/89 14 -15 460 -- -- -- -- -- (4) T - 24 5/11/89 13 -14 2800 -- 590 1300 2400 6600 (4) T - 25 5/11/89 13 -14 1400 -- <500 760 910 3000 (4) T - 26 5/11/89 13 -14 390 -- <550 <550 550 1900 (4) T - 27 ' 5/11/89 13 - 14 2600 -- 1300 1500 3300 8700 (4) T - 28 i 5!j1/89 13 -14 1200 -- <500 , .. <5q0 <500 2900 ! (4) TABLE 2 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED DURING THE REMEDIAL EXCAVATION PAGE 1 OF 6 ( 1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4 (2) EPA Method 4181 (3) Thin-layer chromatagraphy meth ( Additional . soil exca _ from this area after sample wascollected Area was resampled after additionat:excavation • pp = parts per million ppb =parts per billion, =not lasted C7 CD C CD CD TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 2 OF 6 Notes: ( 1) ample locations shown in Fi 4 ' (2) EPA Method 4181. (3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy meth ( 4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation. ppm = Parts per minion: ppb = p arts per billion ; not tested C7 CD CD C q. CD Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled Depth Interval 418.1(2) ppm TLC(3) ppm Comments T -29 5/11/89 13 -14 3.9 -- <540 <540 <540 <1100 T - 30 5/11/89 13 -14 7.7 -- <530 <530 <530 <1100 T -31 5/11/89 13 -14 15 -- <520 <520 <520 <1000 (4) T -32 5/11/89 13 -14 <2 -- <270 <270 <270 <540 T - 33 5/12/89 13 -14 300 -- <250 <250 <250 <500 (4) T - 34 5/12/89 13 -14 3 -- <260 <260 <260 <520 • T - 35 5/12/89 13 -14 1000 -- <310 620 <310 3700 T -36 5/12/89 13 -14 90 -- <270 <270 <270 <540 T - 37 5/15/89 13 - 14 <2.0 -- <130 <130 540 530 T - 38 5/15/89 13 -14 <2.0 -- <130 <130 <130 <260 T - 39 5/15/89 13 -14 <2.0 -- <130 <130 <130 <260 T-40 5/15/89 13 -14 <2.0 -- <120 <120 <120 <240 5/15/89 15 -16 8.1 <50 <1 <1 <1 N 5/15/89 15 -16 38 <50 <1 <1 <1 1 V 5/15/89 15 -16 47 <50 4 <1 <1 5/15/89 15 -16 163 100 2 <1 <1 U) tD N. CO 0 I-- H1 I--I 5/15/89 15 -16 12 <50 <1 1 <1 <2 5/15/89 13 -14 -- 600 -- -- -- -- (4) 5/15/89 13 -14 -- 1000 -- -- -- -- (4) 5/15/89 13 -14 -- 1600 36 15 <1 45 (4) 5/15/89 13 -14 -- 600 -- -- -- -- (4) TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 2 OF 6 Notes: ( 1) ample locations shown in Fi 4 ' (2) EPA Method 4181. (3) Thin -layer chromotagraphy meth ( 4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation. ppm = Parts per minion: ppb = p arts per billion ; not tested C7 CD CD C q. CD 4 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) Note 1) Sample locations shown in Figure EPA :Method. 418.1 )Thin layer chromotagraphy meth 4)Additional soil excavated from this area aftersampie was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation ppm a parts per million; ppb = parts per billion not tested PAGE 3 OF 6 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled Depth Interval 418.1(2) ppm TLC ppm Comments T - 51 5/15/89 15 -16 227 <50 <1 <1 <1 <2 (4) T - 52 5/15/89 15 -16 -- 500 34 20 <1 100 T - 53 5/15/89 15 -16 - <50 31 7 9 28 T - 54 5/15/89 15 -16 50 18 4 3 21 - T - 55 5/15/89 15 -16 - 3000 40 19 8 120 (4) T - 56 5/15/89 15 -16 <; <50 <1 <1 <1 <2 T - 57 5115/89 15 -16 - <50 <1 <1 <1 <2 T - 58 5/15/89 15 -16 - 300 20 10 8 66 (4) T - 59 5/15/89 15 -16 1240 300 45 15 (4) T - 60 5/15/89 15 -16 - 300 6 9 0 (4) T - 61 5/15/89 15 -16 <5.0 <50 <1 <1 T - 62 5/15/89 15 -16 -- 300 19 <1 (4) T - 63 5/15/89 15 -16 25 <50 <1 <1 T - 64 5/15/89 15 -16 -- <50 CD <1 <1 T - 65 5/15/89 15 -16 12 <50 2 <1 T - 66 5/15/89 15 -16 -- 1000 17 32 (4) T - 67 5/15/89 15 -16 <5.0 <50 <1 <1 T - 69 5117/89 15 -16 <5.0 <50 <1 <1 T - 70 5/17/89 15 -16 -- <50 c) <1 <1 T - 71 - 15/17/89 15 -16 8.2 <50 1 i f1 <1 1 4 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) Note 1) Sample locations shown in Figure EPA :Method. 418.1 )Thin layer chromotagraphy meth 4)Additional soil excavated from this area aftersampie was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation ppm a parts per million; ppb = parts per billion not tested PAGE 3 OF 6 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 4 OF 6 Notes: 1) Sample locations, shown in Figure. (2) EPA Metho 41 1 . ) Thin layer:chromotagraphy meth (4)•Additionai soil excavated,from this area after sample was collected Area;was resampled after excavation. ppm = parts per million; ppb = Parts per billion; _` =not tested Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb E benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled Depth Interval 418.1(2) ppm (3) ppm Comments T -72 5/17/89 12 -- 3000 <1 <1 <1 36 (4) T -73 5/17/89 10 18 100 <1 <1 <1 <2 T -74 5/17/89 12 -- 3000 99 54 39 130 (4) T -75 5/17/89 12 -- <50 <1 <1 <2 T -76 5/18/89 12 22 <50 <1 <1 T -77 5/18/89 12 -- <50 V <1 <1 N T -78 5/18/89 12 13 50 a 11 T -79 5/18/89 12 74 50 <I <1 T -80 5/19/89 16 -1; - <50 <1 <1 <1 <2 T -81 5/19/89 16 -1; - 500 <1 8 <1 21 (4) T -82 5/19/89 16-17 431 800 <1 <1 <1 52 (4) T -83 5/19/89 16-17 18 <50 -- -- -- T-84 5/22/89 13 -14 8.9 <50 <1 <1 <1 T-85 5/22/89 13 -14 -- <50 <1 <1 <1 T -86 5/22/89 13 -14 11.3 <50 <1 <1 <1 T -87 5/22/89 13 -14 -- 300 <1 <1 <1 (4) T -88 5/22/89 13 -14 5.7 <1 <1 <1 i° V T - 89 5122/89 15 - 16 -- <1 <1 3 T -90 5/22/89 13 -14 22.1 C <1 <1 <1 T -91 5/22/89 13 -14 -- <1 <1 <1 T -92 l 5/22/89 18 -19 <5.0 5 , ., : ) 5 <1 : (4) TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 4 OF 6 Notes: 1) Sample locations, shown in Figure. (2) EPA Metho 41 1 . ) Thin layer:chromotagraphy meth (4)•Additionai soil excavated,from this area after sample was collected Area;was resampled after excavation. ppm = parts per million; ppb = Parts per billion; _` =not tested TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 5 OF 6 (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4 (2),EPA Method 418.1 . (3) Thin - l a yer chromotagraphy method ( 4) Additional soil excavated : from this area alter sample was collected.. Area was resampfed after additional excavation. , •ppm = parts per million; ppb = Parts per: billion -: - ` not tested Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Benzene ppb E benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Sample Number(1) Date Sampled Depth Interval 418.1(2) ppm TLC(3) ppm Comments T -93 5/22/89 18 -19 -- <50 <1 <1 <1 2 T -94 5/22/89 16-19 <5.0 <50 <1 <1 <1 3 T -95 5/22189 16 -19 -- <50 <1 <1 <1 <2 T -96 5122/89 16 -19 16.2 <50 4 3 5 17 T - 97 5/23/89 16 - 19 -- <50 <1 <1 <1 N N 2 V T -98 5/23/89 16 -19 12.4 <50 <1 <1 <1 • T -99 5/23/89 16 -19 -- 300 8 3 <1 (4) T -100 5/23/89 16 -19 <5.0 <50 <1 <1 <1 T - 101 5/23/89 16 - 19 -- 500 28 12 <1 120 (4) T -102 5/23/89 17 - 19 189 300 <1 <1 <1 51 (4) T - 103 5123/89 17 - 19 -- 500 <1 <1 <1 <2 (4) T -104 5123/89 17 -19 138 100 18 79 <1 <2 T -105 5/23/89 17 -19 73 100 11 <1 <1 <2 T -106 5/23/89 17 -19 -- 100 22 54 <1 97 T - 107 5/24/89 17 - 19 -- 500 <1 <1 <1 19 (4) T -108 5124/89 17 -19 94 100 <1 <1 <1 <2 T -109 5/24/89 17 -19 -- 100 <1 <1 <1 <2 T - 110 5/24/89 17 - 19 61 50 <1 <1 <1 <2 T - 111 5/24/89 17 - 19 -- <50 <1 2 <1 <2 T - 120 5/25/89 18 - 19 75 -- <62 <62 <62 <120 T -121 5/25/89 18 -19 49 -- <62 <62 <62 <120 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 5 OF 6 (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4 (2),EPA Method 418.1 . (3) Thin - l a yer chromotagraphy method ( 4) Additional soil excavated : from this area alter sample was collected.. Area was resampfed after additional excavation. , •ppm = parts per million; ppb = Parts per: billion -: - ` not tested TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 6 OF 6 Notes: (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4. (2) EPA Method 418.1 3) Thin layer chromotagraphy meth 4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation. ppm =: parts per million; ppb = parts per billion, - = not tested Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Ethyl- Total Sample Date Depth 418.1(2) TLC(3) Benzene benzene Toluene Xylenes Number(1) Sampled Interval ppm ppm ppb ppb ppb ppb Comments T -122 5/26/89 18 -19 51 -- -- -- -- � ` 1 t! ) ' V V � V <62 <62 <120 T -123 5/26/89 18 -19 64 110 <65 340 T -124 5/26/89 18 -19 <4.0 <65 <65 <130 T -125 5/26/89 18 -19 22 <59 <59 <120 TABLE 2 (CONTINUED) PAGE 6 OF 6 Notes: (1) Sample locations shown in Figure 4. (2) EPA Method 418.1 3) Thin layer chromotagraphy meth 4) Additional soil excavated from this area after sample was collected Area was resampled after additional excavation. ppm =: parts per million; ppb = parts per billion, - = not tested Boring Sample Depth Date Collected Fig Id Screening (1) Fuel X (ppb) (4) Head: Vapor T X 12.5 03/24/89 240 NS VVZ. � 17.5 03/24/89 175 NS 12.5 04/03/89 NT NT 8 05/03/89 <100 NS U 8 05/04/89 <100 NS 8 05/03/89 <100 NS 8 05/04/89 <100 NS 13 06/08/89 <100 NS 13 06/08/89 <100 NS TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL SAMPLES FROM BORINGS Notes: (1) Measurements for headspace Vapors obtained using a Bacharach TLV Snilter calibrated to hexane (110 ppm 1st; LEL hexane ; (2) TPN analyzed by EPA Method 418.1 (3) Fuel Hydrocarbons analyzed by modified EPA Method 8015 (4) B ETX analyzed by EPA method 8020 B = Benzene, l= = Ethylbenzene, T = Toluene, X= Total Xylenes • ppm = parts pe mi(Qon ppb =. parts per billion NT indicates notteSt ed Results for MW -3 Iron 8, Miller i " f co O !11� CD CD WELL Sheen (1) TPH (2) (ppm) BETX (ppb) (3) B E T X 222222222 NS <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NS <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 NS NT <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 NS <0.5 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 8.7 NS 0.7 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 NS <0.5 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 6.3 NS <0.5 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 NS <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1. - NS <0.05 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 r Geo go Engineers TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES FROM WELLS Notes (1) "NS ", means no sheen detected on water surface ?) Total Petroteum Hydrocarbons by EPA Method 418. (3) sETX by EPA Method 602 6 Benzertie, E - Etthylbenzene T - Toluene. X -Tot pprri P aris per millio parts.per blllio esuits(of.M1N =3; from "Geraghty& Milier Sample Date(1) Collected TPH (2) (ppm) BETX (ppb) ( B E T X Comments co 7 c j c / to 03/23/89 420 375 80 515 435 Collected from excavation 03/29/89 275 26.4 <1.0 18.3 31.2 Collected from recovery well 03/31/89 20 5 <1.0 <1.0 15 Collected from recovery well 05/04/89 10 260 <40 140 140 Collected from recovery well 05/15/89 <0.5 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 Collected from recovery well 05/31/89 <5.0 1.5 <1.0 1.2 8.3 Collected from recovery well TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR GROUND WATER SAMPLES FROM REMEDIAL EXCAVATION AND R Total xylen Notes: (1) Remedial Excavation was completed on :05126/8 (2) Total Petroleum Hydroc 41 arbons by EPA Method (3) BETX by EPA. Method :602 B ='Benzene, E Q.Ethylbeniene,T =Toluene, X ppm _ parts: per million. ppb = parts billion :' C'7 CD O CD CD Sample No. TPH(1) ppm Sample No. TPH(1) ppm Sample No. TPH(1) ppm Sample No, TPH(1) ppm SSGC -1 78.5 S -13 19.7 S -27 70.3 S -40 33.0 SSGC -2 15.6 S -14 26.0 S -28 36.9 S -41 47.2 SSGC -3 7.9 S -15 46.5 S -29 33.9 S -42 78.8 SSGC -4 59.6 S -17 43.3 S -30 45.3 S -43 37.3 B 25.9 5-18 72.5 S -31 41.5 S -44 38.0 C 46.7 S -19 37.4 S -32 79.4 S -45 27.8 SSG -6 52.6 8-20 15.2 S -33 42.3 S -46 54.9 SSG -7 26.4 S -21 48.8 S -34 78.2 SSG -47 41.9 SSG -8 28.0 S -22 61.3 S -36 71,6 SSG -48 _ 29.0 S -9 41.3 S -23 74.5 S -37 70.3 SSG -49 32.8 S -10 78.6 S -24 70.0 S -38 40.6 S -51 ,.41.9 S -11 30.0 S -25 37.3 S -39 76.0 S -52 36.3 S -12 23.3 S -26 89.3 Geo IV Engineers TABLE 6 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF TREATED SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BY OLYMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Sample No. TPH(1) ppm Benzene ppb Ethyl- benzene ppb Toluene ppb Total Xylenes ppb Gasoline ppm Diesel ppm r CV CO ID CD (s CO Cl) U) Cl) U).U) U) U3 16 <25 <25 <25 34 <5 89 46 <25 <25 <25 <25 <5 60 14 <25 <25 <25 <25 <5 41 16 <25 <25 <25 <25 <5 17 13 <25 <25 31 <25 <5 48 24 <25 <25 <25 <25. <5 87 20 <25 <25 <25 <25 <5 120 Geo j Engineers TABLE 7 RESULTS OF ANALYTICAL TESTING OF TREATED SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED BY GEOENGINEERS Geoff Engineers USGS 7.5' TOPOGRAPHIC MAP "DES MOINES, WASH." Former Building l L: GATEWAY DRIVE 10.000 -Gallon Lobe Oil Tank (Removed) 14 EXPLANATION: � 1 2 3 4 5 5.000 - Gallon Waste Oil Tank (Removed) v S• r. ..A1 ... . >>A 10 I a f 8 T 6 U v FORMER UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK LOCATIONS Ten 20.000 -Gallon Diesel Tanks (Removed) Two 10.000 - Gallon Diesel Tanks V Existing Building Properly Line - 10.000 - Gallon Gasoline Tank (Removed) Limit of Excavation GeosEngineers 40 , 80 SCALE IN FEET SITE PLAN FIGURE 2 eg EXPLANATION: e y N MW -3 \'•': \ c �� 84.35 MW 2 , 41\ 1 84.12 mw-5\ 83.85 MW 65 % \ • ° MW -1 84.10 \ MW -7 \_ e \ 85.35 • \ 83.66 , ' t Existing Building Approximate Limits Of Excavation MONITOR WELL LOCATION AND NUMBER MW -1 84.35 WATER TABLE ELEVATION ON 6/12/89 150 300 SCALE IN FEET GROUND WATER CONTOUR BASED ON 6/12/89 MEASUREMENTS GENERAL DIRECTION OF GROUND WATER FLOW BENCHMARK AT WATER MAIN LID. ASSUMED ELEVATION AT 100.00 FEET. SITE PLAN AND GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS FIGURE 3 Limit Of Excavation - GATEWAY DRIVE 124. 125. •78 36 • 109. 110• • 120• S30 81, 44• 41 102. •55 35. 7D 122 • 105• 24 1011 •47.45 111• 65. 82. • 60 123 • 72. f 104. 69•.28 �• • • 9 73 4• 66-- 68 • • 65 67 64• � � 96 f Former Building 34. • 1060 400 300 75• 51. 390 107. •50 61• 38• 95• 26. 37• •91 89• 87e 90. 88. 29• 13. 12. 10 23• •42 22• - 27. •31 •21 .33 121. 53• 54. 48 103. 464 20 150 17• 1 83• 71.820 92• • 25. 80 ,. 0 0 O U 14• 19• 18• Existing Building EXPLANATION: 13• SAMPLE LOCATION AND NUMBER TPH BELOW CLEANUP GUIDELINES ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARIZED IN TABLE 2 Geo Engineers 40 SCALE IN FEET 80 SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS FIGURE 4 0 B I APPENDIX A Geo 4 Engineers BORINGS Subsurface conditions at the site of the former truck terminal were explored by drilling eight borings (MW -1, MW -2, and MW -4 through MW -9) using truck - mounted hollow -stem auger drilling equipment at the locations indicated in Figure 2. Details of the field exploration program during completion of MW -1, MW -2 and MW -4 through MW -7 are given in our reports dated April 18, 1989 and May 23, 1989. Borings MW -8 and MW -9 were drilled on June 8, 1989 to depths of about 20 feet using drilling equipment owned and operated by R & R Drilling, Inc. The drilling and soil sampling equipment was cleaned with a hot -water pressure washer prior to drilling each boring. A geologist from our staff determined the boring locations, examined and classified the soils encountered, and prepared a detailed log of each boring. Soils encountered were classified visually in general accordance with ASTM D- 2488 -83, which is described in Figure A -1. An explanation of the boring log symbols is presented in Figure A -2. The logs for MW -8 and MW -9 are given in Figures A -4 and A -5. Soil samples were obtained with a Dames & Moore split - barrel sampler (2.4 -inch I.D.). The sampler was driven 18 inches by a 300 -pound weight falling a vertical distance of approximately 18 inches. The number of blows needed to advance the samplers the final 12 inches is indicated to the left of each corresponding sample notations on the boring logs. Soil samples obtained from the borings were split into two portions. One portion of the sample was retained for soil classification and laboratory analysis. The second portion was tested in the field for fuel - related contamination using (1) visual examination, (2) sheen testing, and (3) headspace vapor testing using the Bacharach TLV Sniffer. The results of headspace and sheen screening are included in Table 3. Visual screening consisted of inspecting the soil for the presence of stains indicative of fuel- related contamination. Visual screening is generally more effective when contamination is related to heavier petroleum APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS A - 1 ^^r man ry •r M. , 7 . �,, .Ictr Geo 1; Engineers hydrocarbons, such as motor oil, or when hydrocarbon concentrations are high. Sheen testing and measurement of headspace vapors are more sensitive screening methods which have been effective in detecting contamination at levels below regulatory cleanup guidelines. Sheen testing involves immersion of the soil sample in water and observing the water surface for signs of a sheen. Sheen classifications follow: No Sheen (NS) Slight Sheen (SS) Light colorless sheen, spread is irregular, not rapid; film dissipates rapidly. Moderate Sheen (MS) Light to heavy film, may have some color or iridescence; spread is irregular to flowing, may be rapid; few remaining areas of no sheen on water surface. Heavy Sheen (HS) Heavy colorful film with iridescence; spread is rapid, and sheen flows off the sample; entire water surface may be covered with sheen. Headspace vapor screening involves placing a soil sample in a plastic sample bag. The sample bag is sealed and shaken slightly to expose the soil to the air trapped in the bag. The probe of a Bacharach TLV Sniffer is then inserted into the bag and the TLV Sniffer measures the concentration of combustible vapors present within the sample bag headspace. The TLV Sniffer records concentration in part per million (ppm) and is calibrated to hexane. The instrument is designed to detect combustible vapors at concentrations between 100 and 10,000 ppm. Field screening results are site specific. The results vary with temperature, moisture content, soil lithology, organic content, and type of contaminant(s). A - 2 Geo % Engineers One soil sample was selected from each boring for chemical analysis of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and total xylenes (BETX), total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and fuel hydrocarbons (gasoline and diesel). Samples that were tested are denoted in our boring logs with a "CA." Chain -of- custody procedures were followed in transporting the soil samples to the laboratory. REMEDIAL EXCAVATION Soil samples were collected by GeoEngineers with a stainless steel spoon from the base and sidewalls of the excavation and submitted for analysis of the presence of TPH and BETX. Field screening was conducted on the soil samples obtained from the excavation. Field screening results are were used as a general guideline to delineate areas of petroleum- related contamination in soils. In addition, screening results are used to aid in the selection of soil samples for chemical analysis. The field screening methods employed included visual examination and sheen testing. Visual screening consisted of inspecting the soil for the presence of stains indicative of fuel - related contamination. Visual screening is generally more effective in detecting the presence of heavier petroleum hydrocarbons such as motor oil or when hydrocarbon concentrations are high. Sheen testing involves placing soil in water and observing the water surface for signs of sheen. Sheen testing is more sensitive than visual screening and is effective in detecting contamination at concentrations less than regulatory cleanup guidelines. MONITOR WELL CONSTRUCTION Two- inch - diameter, Schedule 40 PVC pipe was installed in each boring at the completion of drilling. The lower portion of the PVC pipe is machine slotted (0.02 -inch slot width) to allow entry of water, floating hydro- carbons and hydrocarbon vapors into the well casings. Medium sand was placed in the borehole annulus surrounding the slotted portion of the wells. The well casings are protected within flush- grade, locking surface monuments. Monitor well construction is indicated in Figures A -3 and A -4. The monitor well screens were developed by removing water from the wells with a stainless steel bailer. We surveyed the elevations of the r � ryA� '.+,*•awa.,RS1Rt� °: `4?+^;ra A - 3 �h•srrc�,��v�w, R rMg r Geocl iEngineers well casings to the nearest 0.01 foot with an engineer's level on June 12, 1989. An elevation benchmark datum of 100 feet was assumed at a water main lid at the southeast corner of the property. Elevations referenced to this datum are included on the monitor well logs. GROUND WATER SAMPLING PROGRAM Ground water samples were obtained from the MW -8 and MW -9 by GeoEngineers on June 12, 1989. The water samples were collected with a teflon bailer after at least three well volumes of water were removed from each well casing. The water samples were transferred to septum vials and liter bottles in the field and kept cool during transport to the testing laboratory. Hydrochloric acid (a preservative) was added to the water samples intended for analysis of TPH. Chain -of- custody procedures were observed during transport of the samples to the laboratory. The bailer was cleaned prior to each sampling attempt with a trisodium phosphate wash followed by a distilled water rinse. GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS The depth to the ground water table relative to the monitor well casing rims was measured on June 12, 1989. The site measurements were made using a weighted fiberglass tape and water - finding paste. The fiberglass tape was cleaned with a trisodium phosphate wash and a distilled water rinse prior to use at each well. Ground water elevations were calculated by subtracting the water table depth from the casing rim elevations. Water table positions measured on June 12, 1989 are shown in Figure 2. CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM Soil and ground water samples were analyzed by Analytical Technologies, Inc., Sound Analytical Services, Inc., Analytical Resources, Inc., and Enviros Corporation. Infrared spectrophotometry methods were used to analyze for total petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil and ground water samples (EPA Method 418.1). Gas chromatography was used to quantify specific aromatic hydrocarbons in the soil and ground water samples . (EPA Method 8020). An on -site analytical laboratory was operated by Enviros Corporation during a portion of the remedial excavation to provide rapid turn - around of analytical results. The on -site analytical laboratory analyzed for total A - 4 Geo t Engineers petroleum hydrocarbons by thin layer chromatography and specific aromatic hydrocarbons by head space gas chromatography. The on -site analytical results were verified by standard EPA methods. The laboratory reports are presented in Appendices B, C and D. COARSE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 60% RETAINED ON NO. 200 SIEVE FINE GRAINED SOILS MORE THAN 60% PASSES NO. 200 SIEVE NOTES: MAJOR DIVISIONS GRAVEL MORE THAN 60% OF COARSE FRACTION RETAINED ON NO. 4 SIEVE SAND MORE THAN 60% OF COARSE FRACTION PASSES NO. 4 SIEVE SILT AND CLAY LIOUiD LIMiT LESS THAN 50 SILT AND CLAY LIOUID LIMIT 50 OR MORE HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in general accordance with ASTM 02488 -83. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -83. 3. Descriptions of soli density or consistency are based on interpretation of blowcount data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. Geo a Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM CLEAN GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES CLEAN SAND SAND WITH FINES INORGANIC ORGANIC INORGANIC ORGANIC GROUP SYMBOL GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL POORLY - GRADED GRAVEL SILTY GRAVEL CLAYEY GRAVEL WELL - GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND POORLY - GRADED SAND SILTY SAND CLAYEY SAND SILT CLAY GROUP NAME ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT PEAT SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist - Damp, but no visible water Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually soil Is obtained from below water table SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE A-1 LABORATORY TESTS: SOIL GRAPH: AL CP CS DS GS HA K M MD SP TX UC CA Atterberg limits Compaction Consolidation Direct shear Grain -size analysis Hydrometer analysis Permeability Moisture content Moisture and density Swelling pressure Triaxial compression Unconfined compression Chemical Analysis BLOW -COUNT /SAMPLE DATA: Blows required to drive Dames & Moore sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using 300 pound hammer falling 30 inches. "P" indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or hydraulics of drill rig. NOTES: 4% Geo 14. Engineers IMP 1. Soil classification system Is summarized in Figure A -1. Soil Group Symbol (See Note 1) 2. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text as well as the exploration logs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. Distinct contact between Soil Strata Gradual Change between Soil Strata Water Level Bottom of Boring 22 a Location of relatively undisturbed sample 12 ® Location of disturbed sample P p Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 IN Location of sample attempt using Standard Penetration Test procedures 40 0 Location of relatively undisturbed sample using 140 pound hammer failing 30 inches. KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS FIGURE A -2 CI N W N 0 0 w Casing Elevation: 96.4 Casing Stickup: -0.29 0 6 — 10— 16— WELL SCHEMATIC Note: See figure A-2 for explanation of symbols Geo o Engineers MONITOR WELL NO. MW -8 Vapor i « n Conc.(ppm) o 'o E Group Sheen ma co Symbol DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 99.3 FEET BORING COMPLETED AT 20.0 FEET ON 6/8/89 LOG OF MONITOR WELL FIGURE A -3 1199-07-4 REJ:RK:KKT �uur , III fl 1i iii iii i ii iiii ilUflIHI1(flfllIIllillm IuinJ ► -STEEL SURFACE 2- INCHES ASPHALTIC CONCRETE MONUMENT SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND - -BENTONITE SEAL WITH GRAVEL (FILL) - 2 -INCH, SCHEDULE 40 PVC SOLID 3 ■ ML GRAY CLAYEY SILT WITH SAND (LOOSE, MOIST) .0-COARSE SAND BACKFILL 15 GRADES TO GRAY SANDY SILT WITH OCCASIONAL GRAVEL (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) ...■''/ . WATER LEVEL ON 6/8/89 CA SP BLACK FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (MEDIUM 15 DENSE, WET) —2 -INCH, SCHEDULE 40 PVC 0.020 - INCH SLOT WIDTH 11 1 BASE OF WELL AT 20 FEET CI N W N 0 0 w Casing Elevation: 96.4 Casing Stickup: -0.29 0 6 — 10— 16— WELL SCHEMATIC Note: See figure A-2 for explanation of symbols Geo o Engineers MONITOR WELL NO. MW -8 Vapor i « n Conc.(ppm) o 'o E Group Sheen ma co Symbol DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 99.3 FEET BORING COMPLETED AT 20.0 FEET ON 6/8/89 LOG OF MONITOR WELL FIGURE A -3 1199-07-4 REJ:RK:KKT rn 03 0 N W O W C7 w 0 10 15 w 3 20 WELL SCHEMATIC Casing Elevation: 95.90 Casing Stickup: -0.26 AT 20.0 FEET Note: See figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Geo %� Engineers MONITOR WELL NO. MW -9 Vapor , n Conc.(ppm) c o EE ea Sheen m 0 co Group Symbol DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 98.50 FEET BORING COMPLETED AT. 20.0 FEET. ON 6/8/89 LOG OF MONITOR WELL FIGURE A-4 1199-07-4 REJ:RK:KKT - -STEEL SURFACE MONUMENT -BENTONITE SEAL 2- INCHES ASPHALTIC CONCRETE GRAY SILT WITH SAND (LOOSE, MOIST) ML -2 -INCH, SCHEDULE 9 IN 40 PVC SOLID SM BROWN SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND 13 O (MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST) -2 -INCH, SCHEDULE HIM lull I 1111111111 1111111111111111111111 40 PVC 0.020 - INCH SLOT WIDTH / .7.. WATER LEVEL ON 6/8/89 SP BLACK FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (MEDIUM CA DENSE, WET) 10 I +MEDIUM SAND 1 BACKFILL ■ BASE OF WELL rn 03 0 N W O W C7 w 0 10 15 w 3 20 WELL SCHEMATIC Casing Elevation: 95.90 Casing Stickup: -0.26 AT 20.0 FEET Note: See figure A -2 for explanation of symbols Geo %� Engineers MONITOR WELL NO. MW -9 Vapor , n Conc.(ppm) c o EE ea Sheen m 0 co Group Symbol DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: 98.50 FEET BORING COMPLETED AT. 20.0 FEET. ON 6/8/89 LOG OF MONITOR WELL FIGURE A-4 1199-07-4 REJ:RK:KKT APPENDIX B Analytical DATA For Soil Samples Collected from the Remedial Excavation and Borings T Analytical IIeChn0lCfgdeS,InC. 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 104, Renfon, WA 98055, (206) 228.8335 March 1, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Mary ( 'ilva GC Chemist FWG /nah GeoEngineers MAR - 6 1989 Routing ... File Attention : Roy Jensen Project Number : 1099 -07 -4 Project Name On February 16, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two soil samples and one water sample for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. APPENDIX B ATI T.D. 4 8902 -060 Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager L I \ AnoloicolTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1099-07-4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8902-060-1 T-1 SOIL 02/15/89 8902-060-2 T-2 SOIL 02/15/89 8902-060-3 W-1 WATER 02/16/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL WATER 2 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. # 8902-060 The .samples . from this project will be-disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date 64 this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample. control department before the scheduled disposal date. , - AnolyticofTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # :1099 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI I.D. # 8902 -060 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1099 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER UNITS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg 2.6 GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS ATI I.D. # 8902 -060 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER AnolyticolTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT. : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1099 -07 -4 • • PROJECT. NAME : - • PARAMETER PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /L PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS % Recovery = Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) ATI UNITS I.D. GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL 8902 -052 -2 <0.05 <0.05 0 N/A N/A N /A' (Spike Sample Result - :Sample Result) SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC mg/L 8902 -052 -1 0.22 N/A N/A 5.01 5.14 93 Average Result' ATI I.D. # 8902 -060 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER X 1 X 100 AnalyticalTechnoiogies,lnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1099 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg 5.0 240 ATI I.D. # 8902 -060 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL AnalyticolTechnotogies,Inc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1099 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI ATI I.D. # 8902 -060 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg 8902 -068 -1 30,000 28,000 7 N/A N/A N/A PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg 8902 -072 -1 2.6 N/A N/A 69.8 63.9 105 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample. Result) X 10 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ ( Sample Result.- Duplicate Result) Average Result'. X 100 PROJ. MGR Ai l°../ ANALYSIS REQUEST NUMBER OF CONTAINERS COMPANY Alf, n - l Pt.-I-- BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPDS. GC /MS/ 624/8240 PESTICIDES /PCB 608/8080 r LYNUCLEAR OMATIC 610/8310 PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS 604/8040 [H ALOGENATED OLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 ! TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 HYDROCARBONS 8015 PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (131 I CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (8) SWDA•INORGAN(CS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE ADDRESS ( 0 l/() 7 Klli ,� Vy( - 5 2 0 0 SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. 1-.7:- / 1/5 Si) t ' 43 Vic, H, a PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT 71 UISHED BY 1. S ` , RELINQUISHED BY 2. RELINQUISHED BY 3. PROJECT: /0 O TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS d i/ CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS IV? i tur (Ti e) J eer rte„ 21lm yS (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) PQ NU. SHIPPING ID. NO. RECD GOOD CONDITION /COLD (v. ' j (Pnn }erNimel ( ate) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) CONFORMS TO RECORD LAB O /` 07 ` (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY C _ �(nb ( (LABORATORY) 3. I Cr ,„ . 3 • c + SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) (Si azure) (Ti e) /1(1 (( P - 'Jf(1/.Y (Printer! Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. At .1lyticallechnoIogie: 560 Naches Avenue, S.W.. Suite 101. Renton, WA 98055 DATE Chain of Custody PAGE / OF ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458.9141• PHOENIX (602) 438- 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228 -8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE, CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. (NC. r PINK - ORIGINATOR L AnalyticalTechnlologtes,lnc. 560 Noshes Avenue, S.W „Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228 -8335 March 1, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Mar Silva GC hemist FWG /nah ATI I.D. # 8902 -068 GeoEngineers MAR - 3 1989 Routing cr .I. D File Attention : Roy Jensen Project Number : 1199 -7 -4 Project Name : -- on February 17,1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with.EPA methodology or .equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule.' . The results, sample cross reference,_ and the quality control data.are enclosed. Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI I.D. # 8902 -068 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8902 -068 -1 T -3 SOIL 02/17/89 8902 -068 -1 T -4 SOIL 02/17/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 2 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE. The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. B - 10 AnoiyticolTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 ATI I.D. # 8902 -068 AnaiyticafTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 30,000 6,600 ATI I.D. # 8902 -068 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL AnalyticalTechnotogies,Inc. • CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS' ATI UNITS I.D. GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL mg /kg 8902 -068 -1 mg /kg 8902 -072 -1 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result. — Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8902 -068 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED .SPIKE % RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC 30,000 28,000 2.6 N/A 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A 69.8 63.9 105 X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) B 13 Average Result X 100 PROD. MGR. Ci e/rise/ri ANALYSIS REQUEST NUMBER OF CONTAINERS COMPANY 6, vf - ' &,,✓ 7 -$ BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 ( VOLATILE CMPDS. GC /MS/ 624/8240 PESTICIDES /PCB 608/8080 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC 610/8310 ! PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS' 604/8040 HALOGENATED VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC ' l CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 FUEL HYDROCARBONS 8015 PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (13) I CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (8) SWOA•INORGAN(CS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE I PROFILE ADDRESS 7VG- c vv . SA Pi S (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) SAMPL ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. IV PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIREELL QUISHED BY 1. RELINQUISHED BY 2. RELINQUISHED BY 3. PROJECT: tioq- —(1 TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS 1 %.,Afirk-k 3.16' CHAIN OF • • _,A. (Si nature) (Ti el 64 ;o-1) 2 / i 7 f. 7 (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) • ... CONDITION/COLD © (Prints Name) (Date) 6r 1 (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) D. O. LAB • (Company) • (Company) (Company) RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY (LABORATORY) 3. /0/(1/7 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: (Signature) (Time) •(Signature) (Time) y a ur) Ti ) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. AnalyticaITechnologie: 560 Naches Avenue. S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055 Chain of Custody PAGE_) L_ f ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458- 9141•PHOENIX (602) 438- 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228 -8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE. CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • PINK - ORIGINATOR . AnolyticalT @ehnol ®gies,inc. 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renfon, WA 98055. (206) 228 -8335 March 1, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : Roy Jensen Project Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name : - On February 20, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received one soil sample for analysis. The sample was analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mary lva GC C ist FWG /nah ATI I.D. # 8902 -071 GeoEngineers MAR - 6 1989 Routing r D File Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager 6 AnalyticolTechnotogies,Inc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8902 -071 -1 T -5 SOIL 02/20/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 1. SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. # 8902 -071 The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME.: ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 ATI I.D. # 8902 -071 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD J AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER UNITS -1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /kg 140,000 GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS ATI I.D. # 8902 -071 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL AnaiyticalTechnoiagies,Inc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ATI UNITS I.D. GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL mg /kg 8902 -068 -1 mg /kg 8902 -072 -1 30,000 2.6 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) 19 Average Result ATI I.D. # 8902 -071 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC 28,000 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 69.8 63.9 105 X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 PROJ. MGR. Jg.,4 IS RE QUEST NUMBER OF CONTAINERS 1 r COMPANY �/ I •.-TS • BASE/NEU/ACID CMPDS.I GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPDS. GC /MS/ 624/8240 ( PESTICIDES /PCB 608/8080 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC 610/8310 I (PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS' 604/8040 HALOGENATED VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 [HHYD -- 1 HYDROCARBONS 8015 PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS 113) CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC _ [ - E - P TOX METALS 18) SWDA•INORGANICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE ADDRESS SAMP RS ........... (SIGNA URE) (PHONE NO.) 5 --- 7L /G- S) a / SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT QUIS ED BY 1, RELINQUISHED BY 2. (Signature) (Time) RELINQUISHED BY i 3. (Signature) (Time) PR 11.1 i TOTAL N0. OF CONTAINERS ! 2 efO CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS /1 ( (T/ VPJ/ � r V W' v4, 2 PO NO. SHIPPING ID. NO. RECO GOOD CONDITION /COLD % `" F ( Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) CONFORMS TO RECORD LAB Nl :� _ 0 - 1 ( Compa (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1.1 RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY (LABORATORY) 3. t (11 '�� " ," ,• SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) (Signature) / (Time) i //..•. /- / , r (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) I (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. AnalyticalTechnologie 560 Noches Avenue, S.W.. Suite 101, Penton, WA 98055 Chain of Custody PAGE—L— ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458- 91410PHOENIX (602) 438- 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228 -8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE. CANARY- ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0 PINK • ORIGINATOR lTechnolo ies Analytica Inc. g , March 6, 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Ma Silva GC emist FWG /hbb 560 Naches Avenue, S.W.. Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228 -8335 21 ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 GeoEngineers MAR -8 1989 Routing L1 File Attention : Roy Jenson Project Number : 1199 - - Project Name : - On February 23, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received three soil samples and one product sample for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager IlAnolyticalTechnologies,inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME MATRIX SOIL PRODUCT SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8902 -082 -1 T -6 SOIL 02/22/89 8902 -082 -2 T -7 SOIL 02/22/89 8902- 082 -3 T -8 SOIL 02/22/89 8902 -082 -4 P -1 PRODUCT 02/22/89 # SAMPLES 3 1 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. 22 ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS FUEL HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED IR EPA 418.1 ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc, CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS • HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -7 -4 REAGENT BLANK : SOIL 8015 MODIFIED DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N /A DATE EXTRACTED : 02/24/89 DATE ANALYZED : 03/01/89 UNITS. : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 IMO GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 Analyticolrechnotogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199-7-4 PROJECT NAME : - CLIENT I.D. : P-1 SAMPLE MATRIX : PRODUCT EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON ,RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED : 02/22/89 DATE RECEIVED : 02/23/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 02/24/89 DATE ANALYZED : 03/02/89 UNITS ppm DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 910,000 C7 - C24 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8902-082-4 AnolyticaiTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT. NAME : - EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : BLANK 2/24 COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SAMPLE CONC SPIKED RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE 500 448 REC DATE EXTRACTED : 02/24/89 DATE ANALYZED 03/01/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 90 439 88 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result.- Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 X 100 DUP RECOVERY RPD 2 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 Average Result AnalyiicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 -3 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 940 16 68 ATI I.D. # 8902 -082 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL c \ AnalylicotTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS % Recovery. ATI UNITS I.D. GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC mg /Kg 8902 -101 -2 920 850 8 N/A N/A N/A mg /Kg 8902 -082 -2 16 N/A N/A 83.9 63.3 107 (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Average Result X 100 ATI S.D. # 8902 -082 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = ( Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 Sample: rBo02 O82 4 Channel: CPS REAR rID-P Acquired: 02-MAR-8? 1 :20 Method: C \NAX.IDA1A11PPGAS Coneentit DIESEL AND RTE FROGRAt1 FOR DIESEL /PTYE S10S, MS, NSD, FFP, FFPN 11 1 1 1 '',.r f'� P ._.'; 1..0 i ;1 0 CI r.1 cs I ,.....: J11g n... �.._... ......... _. _ . .. ... . • • h 1.1.• . 3 . _ !" A'r}� -.. +.tmw• ..,. .. ,....,..... «..........................« «. • • r ' rl " FIIenanet 9FF0007" Operator: AMC 21.29 DIESEL PROD. MGR }'� • ICJ . t C . � IS RE I [NUMBER OF CONTAINERS 1 t COMPANY */'�0 r ' —1-I [ BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPDS. 1 GC /MS/ 624/8240 I PESTICIDES /PCB 608/8080 POLYNUCLEAR 1 AROMATIC 610/8310 I PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS' 604/8040 HALOGENATED VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 !FUEL HYDROCARBONS 8015 ' PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (13) ' CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (81 SWDA•INORGANICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE ADDRESS SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) f .r -7 tic— s 1 SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. T �� ZI L d i f T- iii v I ( 1 P- I R ,r) C�A� �C C-c (-, �f I . - I PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT R'F.1- INQUISSHED BY 1. RELINQUISHED BY 2 RELINQUISHED BY 3. PROJECT: - 1 TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS 1 Z ), 0 i) .1 ( CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS 1 (Signature! (Time) (Signature) (Time) PQ NO. turei j t (Sq ��r'? \ (�dl� 2 (Ti a � 7 4 REC GOOD CONDITION /COLD D J l (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) SHIPPING ID. NO. CONFORMS TO RECORD I \ (Printed Name) (date) LAB O�a (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED C BY (LABORATORY) 3. 4/./ ll r �. . // ( f /D SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) (i alma' nature) (Ti /k (t f V )/. - /Z)V (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. ) AnalyticalTechnologie 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055 DATE Chain of Custody PAGE OF / ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458- 9141•PHOENIX (602) 438-1530•SEATTLE (206) 228-8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE. CANARY- ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • PINK - ORIGINATOR L. . AnalyticalTethno0og�es,inc. 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228 -8335 March 6, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : Roy Jensen Project Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name : - On February 28, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received one product and one soil sample for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. FWG /tpj - 31 ATI I.A. # 8902 -101 Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8902 - 101-1 P -2 PRODUCT 02/27/89 8902 -101 -2 T -9 SOIL 02/28/89 = = MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 1 PRODUCT 1 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. B - 32 ATI 1.D. # 8902 -101 O \ AnalyficaITechnotogies,lnc CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS FUEL HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED IR EPA 418.1 33 ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 J \ AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT #: PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -07 -4 : - : REAGENT BLANK : SOIL : 8015 MODIFIED DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 03/02/89 DATE ANALYZED : 03/02/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 k AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME : CLIENT I.D. : SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 P -2 PRODUCT 8015 MODIFIED DATE SAMPLED : 02/27/89 DATE RECEIVED : 02/28/89 DATE EXTRACTED 03/02/89 DATE ANALYZED : 03/02/89 UNITS : ppm DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GIMP GASOLINE 1,000,000 C9 -.C24 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 -1 AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT NAME : - EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : 8902 -037 -1 COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS <5 500 535 FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SAMPLE CONC SPIKED % RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE REC % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ (Sample Result — Duplicate Result) ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 DATE EXTRACTED : 02/17/89 DATE ANALYZED : 02/18/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 107 539 108 Average Result X 100 DUP RECOVERY RPD 1 X 100 / 1\ AnalyticalTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS UNITS -2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 920 37 ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL J \ AnalyticalTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI I.D. # 8902 -101 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL ATI SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8902 -101 -2 920 850 8 N/A N/A N/A PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8902 -082 -2 16 N/A N/A 83.9 63.3 107 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) h Semple: F8;(:2 101 t Channel: DB! FEAR FID-B Acquired: 02-1AR-B q 20:02 Method: COMADAtAl\AUSAS Comments: DIESEL PUB BID msliar FOR DIESEL/ME SUS. MS, rED, FPB. FFB1) i J IIr , rn "! t • 1117 1 • „ — . . ";;;;:',;.3 ^V r••••••■•-• 1.••■• • 41 4fflt"" ° : ,. . •• Mtn; . 14 4 t "•uP . • ' .4. Filename: 'FF0008: Operator: AMC • 20.28 DIESEL ' 14)�� ) ' PROJ. MGR 1� '� ANALYSIS REQUEST 1 -_-I NUMBER OF CONTAINERS 1 COMPANY Ga D &Ai r/t(�l. -r...f BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 ✓ c VOLATILE CMPDS. 1 GC /MS/ 624/8240 . `,- ` „ IPESTICIDES /PCB 608 /8080 y: POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC 610/8310 {_V ``' PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS _\ 604/8040 HALOGENATED " 'HALOGENATED 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 ' PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 i n { j' yy Y .v PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (13) I CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (B) SWDA•INORGAN ICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY _IPROFILEOUS WASTE ADDRESS SAMPLERS V r.f.:_le.------ (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) / l/6 - si is SAMPLE ID. DATE 2 1 r TIME MATRIX 11, 0 LAB ID. ? - - r-i 21213 7, 1 „,.... ye- _. PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT $EL1(IQUISHEP BY 1. 1 , I' (../"--- • ��D� -, RELINQUISHED BY 2. RELINQUISHED BY 3. PROJ� T - ' � , � ,''11 0 TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS ,'.l CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS 71 (� { tur ` t 2 /1Tirt+7) .74 i �J� & / J f (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) PQ NO. REC'O GOOD CONDITION /COLD (Pr} o ted Fame) (Date) (7C/ (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) SHIPPING ID- NO. CONFORMS TO RECORD LAB NQ_� ^ J /() f / ;,) / (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY (LABORATORY) 3. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS � (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) . �r,k'(r (( '/-I �; 3 �/SYi (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) . (Printed Name) (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. t 4 t ,AnalyticalTechno San Diego • Phoenix • Seattle in of Custody DATE 2 12 q/9? PAGE ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458- 9141•PHOENIX (602) 438- 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228 -8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE, CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • PINK - ORIGINATOR Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. T -10 2888A T -11 2888B T -12 2888C T- T -13 2888D - ARI ID — Date Analyzed 4/26/89 4/26/89 4/26/89 4/26/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.018 gm 0.018 gm µg /Kg 0.017 gm µg /Kg 0.019 gm µg /Kg _ Units µg /Kg 71 -43 -2 Benzene 280U 280U 3000 260U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 1600 280U 3000 2600 _ 100.41 -4 _ Ethylbenzene 280U 280U 3330 — 260U 1330.20.7 Total Xylenes 1200 560U 6000 - 107% 520U 105% Bromobenzene 99.2% 107% METHOD BLANK ARI ID 2888MB Date Analyzed 4/26/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.025 gm Units gg /Kg Benzene 233U Toluene 200U Ethylbenzene 203U Total Xylenes 400 U 3romobenzene 109% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BETX QC Report No: 2888 - Geo Engineers 333 Ninth Ave. North Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 Date Received: 4/26/89 333 sz1 •saga Data Release Authorized: 4...ez e...t. Report prepared: 04 /27/89 - MAC:B Matrix: Sediments /Soils Level: Low urrogate Recovery Surro Value U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. NR B Analysis not required. If the result Is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as a sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination. Analytical Chemists & Consultants K This flag Is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 2888 MB Method blank 1 to 10 1.0 U 2888 A T -10 1 to 10 1 .3 2888 B T -11 1 to 10 2 6 2888 C T -12 1to10 1.OU _ 2888D T -13 1 to 10 1 .3 Matrix: Soil /Sediment QC Report No: 2 8 8 8 VTSR: 4/26/89 1 2 3 4 5 Lab ID DATA RELEASE AUTHORIZED 41,4.4iL?a,e/ REPORT PREPARED: MAC: C- C.D. (4/28/89) TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - Modified EPA Method 418.1 Dilution Client Sample ID Factor TPH (ppm Data Qualifier U Indicates compound was analyzed but not detected at the given detection limit Analytical Chemists 8 Consultants Client Project: 1199 -07 -4 Date of Analysis: 4/26/89 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621-6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number E Sample No. Method Blk. T -14 T -15 2894B T -16 ARI ID 0426MB 2894A 2894C Date Analyzed 04 /26/89 04/26/89 04/26/89 04/26/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.025g 0.018g 0.019g 0.019g Units µg /Kg µg /Kg µg /Kg µg /Kg 71 -43 -2 Benzene 2000 280U 2GOU 270U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 2000 280U 260U 270U 100 -41 -4 Ethylbenzene 2000 280U 260U 270U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 400U 560U 520U 540U Bromobenzene 109% _ 97.0% 97.4% 105% CAS Number Sample No. T -17 T -18 ARI ID 2894D 2894E Date Analyzed 04/26/89 04/26/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.017 g 0.017 g I Units ug /Kg gg /Kg 71-43-2 Benzene 290U 2900 108 -88 -3 Toluene _ 290U 290U - 100 -41 -4 Ethylbenzene 290U 290U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 580U 580U Bromobenzene 97.1% 100% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BE1X Matrix: Sediments /Soils Level: Low Data Release Authorized: _ Report prepored: 04 /27/89 - MAC:E Surrogate Recovery urrogore recovery Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection Gmit. NR Analysis not required. Data Reporting Qualifiers B.— 43 QC Report No: 2894 - GeoEngrs. Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Date Received: 04/26/89 Analytical Chemists & Consultants This flag is used when the analyte Is found In the blank as well as the sample,. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination This flog is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 2894 MB Method blank 1 to 10 1.0 U 2894A T -14 1to10 110 28948 T -15 1to10 1.OU 2894 C�' T -16 1 to 10 2 2894 D T -18 1 to 10 1 2 2894 E T -19 1 to 10 1.0 U Matrix: Soil /Sediment QC Report No: 2 8 9 4 VTSR: 4/26/89 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lab ID DATA RELEASE AUTHORIZED TOTAL. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - Modified EPA Method 418.1 REPORT PREPARED: MAC: C- C,D. (4/28/89) Dilution Client Sample ID Factor Client Project: 1 9.0 7.4 Date of Analysis: 4/2 6/8 9 TPH (Dom Data Qualifier U Indicates compound was analyzed but not detected at the given detection limit ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621.6490 28 April 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen GeoEngineers 2405 140th Ave N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 David R Mitchell Project Manager DRM /cd enclosures ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants Project No1199 -07 -4 ; ARI job No. 02903 Dear Mr. Jenson: Please find enclosed TPH & BETX data for the above referenced project. If you have any questions or require additional information, Please feel free to call anytime. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 2903 MB Method Blank 1 2 U 2903 A T -19 1 6.5 2903 B T -20 1 2 U TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 1 2 3 Lab ID Project: 1199-07-4 Matrix: Soils /Sediments QC Report No: 2903 - GeoEngrs. VTSR: 04/27/89 Data Release Authorized ‘42: Data Prepared: 04/28/89 - MAC:E Date of Analysis: 04/28/89 Date Prepared: 04/28/89 Client Sample ID Factor Values reported in ppm (mg /Kg) based on wet weight of sample U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. Dilution TPH (ppm ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621.6490 ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Sediments /Soils QC Report No: Level: Low Project No: Date Received: Data Release Authorized: li Report prepared: 04 /28/89 - MACE Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number 71 -43 -2 108 -88 -3 100.41 -4 1330 -20-7 Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Value if the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. NR Analysis not required. Sample No. ARI ID Dote Analyzed Amt (Dry Wt) Units Bromobenzene Surrogate Recovery 2903 - GeoEngrs. 1199-07-4 04/27/89 T -20 2903B 04/27/89 04/27/89 04 /27/89 0.018 g µg /Kg Method BIk. 0427MB T -19 2903A 0.025 g p.g /Kg 200U 200U 2000 400 U 104% 0,017 g lig /Kg 290U 290U 290U 580U 99,9% 280U 280U 280U 560U 90.7% Data Reporting Qualifiers Analytical Chemists & Consultants K This flag Is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. This flog is used when the analyte Is found In the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621 -6490 08 May 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen GeoEngineers 2405 140th Ave N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 David R Mitchell Project Manager DRM /cg enclosures Geo Engineers MAY 1 0 19e9 Routing O n File ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants Project No1199 -07 -4 ; ARI job Nos. 2933 Dear Mr. Jensen: Please find enclosed TPH & BETX data for the above referenced project. If you have any questions or require additional information, Please feel free to call anytime. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621-6490 2933 MB Method Blank 1 2'.9 2933 A T -21 1 4 6 2933 B T -22 1 1 0 0 2933 C T -23 1 4 6 0 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 Project: 1199.07.4 Matrix: Soils /Sediments QC Report No: 2933 - GeoEngrs. VTSR: 05/04/89 Data Release Authorized �,,. /l�_ --- Data Prepared: 05/05/89 - MAC :E 2 3 4 Lab ID Date of Analysis: 05/04/89 Date Prepared: 05/04/89 Dilution Client Sample ID Factor Values reported in ppm (mg /Kg) based on wet weight of sample U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. TPH (DDm ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 17 May 1989 Dear Roy: Roy Jensen GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 - 140th Avenue NE Bellevue, WA 98005 Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. David R. Mitchell Project Manager DRM /jv Enclosures cc: file #02960 #02962 Routing File RE: Samples submitted for "RUSH" BTEX and TPH analysis as AR! Job: #02960 and #02962; GeoEngineer Project: 1199 -07 -4. Please find the enclosed results for the above referenced analyses as ARI Job's #02960 and #02962. If you have any questions or need any further information, please feel free to call any time. GeoEngineers MAY 201999 D D D D ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621.6490 2960 MB Method Blank 1 3.2 _ 2960 A T -24 25 2800 2960 B T -25 20 1400 2960 C T -26 1 390 2960 D T-27 20 2600 2960 E T -28 20 1200 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 Matrix: Soils /Sediments Data Release Authorized Data Prepared: 05/12/89 - MAC:E 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lab ID Project: 1199 -07 -4 QC Report No: 2960 - GeoEngineers VTSR: 05/11/89 Date of Analysis: 05/11/89 Date Prepared: 05/11/89 Dilution Client Sample ID Factor TPH (opm Values reported in ppm (mg /Kg) based on wet weight of sample U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Bik. T -24 T -25 T -26 ARIID 0511MB 2960A 2960B 29600 Date Analyzed 05/11/89 05/11/89 05/11/89 05/11/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.012 g(equiv.) 0,009 g 0.010g 0.009 g Units µg /Kg µg /Kg µg /Kg gg /Kg 71 -43 -2 Benzene 1330-20-7 4000 4000 590 2400 5000 910 550U 550 108 -88 -3 Toluene 100 -41 -4 Ethylbenzene 4000 1300 760 550U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 8000 6600 3000 1900 Bromobenzene 100% 102% 109% 98,7% CAS Number Sample No. T -27 T -28 ARIID 29600 2960E Date Analyzed 05/11/89 05/11/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.009 g 0010 g Units µg /Kg µg /Kg 171 -43 -2 Benzene 1300 ._.. 5000 [ 108-88-3 Toluene 3300 5000 100 -41 -4 Ethylbenzene 1500 790 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 8700 2900 _ Bromobenzene 95,7% 102% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BEIX Matrix: Sediments /Soils Level: Low Data Release Authorized: Report prepored: 05/12/89 - MACE Value If the result Is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. NR Analysis not required. urrogare Recovery urrogat Recovery QC Report No: 2960- GeoEngineers333 Ninth Ave. North Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 Date Received: 05/11/89 (206) 621.6490 Data Reporting Qualifiers B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination This flog is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilutbn should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 2962 MB Method Blank 1 3.2 2962 A T -29 1 3.9 2962 B T -30 1 7.7 2962 C T-31 1 1 5 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 Project: 1199.07 -4 Matrix: Solis /Sediments QC Report No: 2962 - GeoEngineers ,y��_ VTSR:05 /11/89 Data Release Authorized // Data Prepared: 05/12/89 - MAC:E 1 2 3 4 Lab ID Date of Analysis: 05/11/89 Date Prepared: 05/11/89 Dilution Client Sample ID Factor TPH (DDm Values reported in ppm (mg /Kg) based on wet weight of sample U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave, North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Blk. T -29 T -30 T -31 ARI ID 0511MB 2962A 2962B 2962C Date Analyzed 05/11/89 0.012 g(equiv.) 05/11/89 0.009 g 05/11/89 0,009 g 05/11/89 0.010 g Amt (Dry Wt) Units gg /Kg µg /Kg µg /Kg gg /Kg 71 -43 -2 Benzene 4000 540U 530U 520U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 4000 540U 530U 523U 100.41 -4 Ethylbenzene 4000 543U 530U 523U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 800 U 1100 U 1100 U 1000 U Bromobenzene 100% 109% 97.2% 96.9% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Sediments /Soils Level: Low NR Analysis not required. Data Release Authorized: Report prepared: 05/12/89 - MAC:E Surrogate Recovery Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value, U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. Data Reporting Qualifiers This flog is used when the anolyte is found In the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flog is used when quantitated value foils above the limit of the calibration curve and dilutbn should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants QC Report No: 2962-GeoEnglneers333 Ninth Ave. North Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (zos) 621 -6490 Date Received: 05/11/89 15 May 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen GeoEngineers 2405140th Ave N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 Project No1199 -07.4 ; ARI job No. 2974 Dear Mr. Jensen: Please find enclosed TPH & BETX data for the above referenced protect. If you have any questions or require additional Information, Please feel free to call anytime. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. David .R Mttchell Project Manager DRM /cg enclosures ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID { CAS Number Sample No. Method Blk. T -32 T -33 T -34 ARI ID 0512MB 2974A 2974E 2974C Date Analyzed 05/12/89 05/12/89 05/12/89 05/12/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.025 g (equiv.) 0.018 g 0.020 g 0.019 g ( Units µg /Kg µg /Kg 4g /Kg µg /Kg 71-43-2 Benzene 200U 270U 250U 260U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 200U 270U 250U 260U 100 -41 -4 Ethylbenzene 2000 270U 250U 260U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 400U 540U 5000 520U Bromobenzene 105% 101% 99.4% 109% CAS Number Sample No. T -35 T -36 ARIID 29740 2974E Date Analyzed 05/12/89 05/12/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.016 g 0.018 g Units 4g /Kg 4g /Kg 71 -43 -2 Benzene 310U 270U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 310U 270U 10041 -4 Ethylbenzene 620 270U 1330.20-7 Total Xylenes 3700 540U Bromobenzene 96.3% 110% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Sediments /Soils QC Report No: 2974 - GeoEngrs. Level: Low Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Date Received: 05/12/89 Data Release Authorized: _i?h._._ -- Report prepared: 05/75/89 - MAC :E NR Analysis not required. urrogafe Recovery Surrogate Recovery Value If the result Is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. Data Reporting Qualifiers ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED K This flag Is used when quantttated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample, Indicates possible /probable blank contamination Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109-5187 (206) 621.6490 2974MB Method Blank 1 2 U .o. 2974 A T -32 1 2 U 2974 B T -33 1 300 2974 C T -34 1 3 2974 D T -35 3 1000 2974 E T -36 1 9 0 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 Matrix: Soils /Sediments Data Release Authorized Data Prepared :05 /15/89 - MAC :C C.G. 2 3 4 5 6 Lab ID Date of Analysis: 05/13/89 Date Prepared: 05/13/89 Client Sample ID Project: 1199.07.4 VTSR: 05/12/89 Dilution Factor TPH (ppm Values reported in ppm (mg /Kg) based on wet weight of sample U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 2980 MB Method Blank 1 2.0 U 2980 A T -37 1 2.0 U 2980 B T -38 1 2.0 U 2980 C T -39 1: 2.0 U 2980 D T -40 1 2.0 U Matrix: Soil /Sediment QC Report No: 2980- GeoEngineers Inc. VTSR: 05/15/89 Data Release Authorized 1 2 3 4 5 Lab ID TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - Modified EPA Method 418.1 Dilution Client Sam le ID Factor Project: 1199-07-4 Date of Analysis: 05/16/89 Date Prepared: 05/16/89 Data Prepared: MAC:C - J.V. 05/18/89 TPH fapm Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon values are reported in wet weight, Data Qualifier U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621-6490 ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BETX Bromobenzene Surrogate Recovery Bromobenzene Surrogate Recovery Value If the result Is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. NR Analysis not required. Matrix: Sediments /Solis Level: Low Data Release Authorized: _.;? �L. r- ---- - Report prepared: 05/16/89 - MAC:E CAS Number 71 -43 -2 108 -88 -3 10041 -4 1330 -20-7 Sample No. ARI ID Date Analyzed Amt (Dry Wt) Units Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes T -40 2980D 05/15/89 0.041 g lag /Kg 120 U 120U 120U 240U 87,2% Analytical Chemists & Consultants QC Report No: 2980 - GeoEngrs. Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Date Received: 05/15/89 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number 71 -43 -2 108 -88 -3 100 -41 -4 1330-20-7 Benzene Toluene Sample No. ARI ID Date Analyzed Amt (Dry Wt) Units Ethylbenzene Total Xylenes Method Bik. 0515MB 05/15/89 0.050 g (equiv.) 1.9 /Kg 1000 200U 102% T -37 2980A 05/15/89 0.039 g lag /Kg 130U 540 130U 530 T -38 29806 05/15/89 0.039 g lag /Kg 130U 130U 130U 260U T -39 29800 05/15/89 0.039 g lag /Kg 130U 130U 103U 1000 130U 260U 102% 95.2% 88,3% Data Reporting Qualifiers B This flag Is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample, Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flag Is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621-6490 John Biggane, Project Manager GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 -140th Avenue N.E., Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear John: Enclosed are the results of the analyses of samples submitted on May 17, 1989 from Tukwilla, WA. Project. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this material, or if you just want to discuss any aspect of your projects, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, (:) James K. Farr, Ph.D. (_,// JKF /jkf Enclosures Corporation Scientists & Engineers (206) 455.2962 fax 451 8546 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th Street Bellevue, Washington '.98004 Analytical Laboratory: 225 112th Avenue NE (206) 453.8174 R L� D ON1.n ..n ............. . p F .c May 18, 1989 GeoEngineers MAY 2 0 1989 Date of Report: May 18, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Tukwilla, WA. Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY IR (EPA METHOD 418.1) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) T -41 8.1 T -42 38 T -43 47 T-44 163 T -45 12 T -51 227 T -54 <5.0 T-56 <5.0 T -59 1240 T -61 <5.0 Ouality Assurance Method Blank T -61 (Duplicate) 61 <5.0 <5.0 G•R9d74(as, John Biggane, Project Manager GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 -140th Avenue N.E., Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear John: Enclosed are the results of the analyses of soil samples submitted on May 19, 1989 from Project Tukwilla, WA. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this material, or if you just want to discuss any aspect of your projects, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, C ( /. James K. Farr, Ph.D. / JKF /jkf Enclosures tmliTtw Geo Engineers MAY 2 5 1989 Routing . . ........... . ..... May 23, 1989 Corporation Scientists 8 Engineers (206) 455 -2962 fax 451-8546 600 Skyline Tower ,10900 NE 4th Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 Analytical Laboratory: 225 112th Avenue NE (206) 453.8174 Date of Report: May 23, 1989 Date Submitted: May 19, 1989 Project: Tukwilla, WA am lie # T -63 'T -65 T -67 T -69 T -71 T -73 T -7.6 T -78 T -79 Ouality Assurance Method Blank T-79.. (Duplicate) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY IR (EPA METHOD 418.1) Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ppm) 25 12 <5.0 <5.0 8.2 18 22 13 74. <5.0 69 John Biggane, Project Manager GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 -140th Avenue N.E., Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear. John: Enclosed are the results of the analyses of soil samples submitted on May 16 -24, 1989 from Project Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA). We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this material, or if you just want to discuss any aspect of your projects, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James K. Farr, Ph.D. JKF /jkf Enclosures , vateatr<v Corporation Scientists & Engineers (206) 455.2962 lax 451.8546 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 Analytical Laboratory: 225 112th Avenue NE. (206) 453.8174 June 5, 1989 GeoEngineers JUN - 7 1989 Routing r �s ❑ • File ..J /..Y..7 ..P.2 -.. y Date of Report: June 5, 1989 Date Submitted: May 16 -24, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA) $ample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY IR (EPA METHOD 418.1) T -76 soil 22 T -78 soil 13 T -79 soil 74 T -82 soil 431 T -83 soil 18 T -84 soil 8.9 T -86 soil 11.3 T -88 soil 5.7 T -90 soil 22.1 T -92 soil <5.0 T- 94 soil <5.0 T -96 soil 16.2 T -98 soil 12.4 T -100 soil <5.0 T -102 soil 189 T -104 soil 138 T -105 soil 73 T -108 soil 94 T -110 soil 61 Ouality Assurance Method Blank <5.0 3 65 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) saialvd 12 June 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen Geo Engineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave N.E. Bellevue, WA 98005 David R Mitchell Project Manager DRM /bv enclosures cc: file #03047 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED GeoEr1c Analytical Chemists & JUN 13 lbc J Consultants rr 333 Ninth Ave. North ............�..•••..•- • f::'' Seattle. Wa98109.5187 �-- _ (206) 621.6490 Re: ARI Job #3047; Project: #11999-07-4 Dear Roy: Please find enclosed results for the above referenced project. This Information was faxed to you on June 6, 1989. If you have any questions or require additional information, Please feel free to call anytime. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Bik. T -120 T -121 T -122 ARI ID 0530MB 3047A 3047B 05/30/89 3047C 05/30/89 Date Analyzed 05/30/89 05/30/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.100 g (equiv.) 0.081 g 0.081 g 0.081 g Units µg /Kg gg /Kg gg /Kg lig /Kg 71 -43-2 Benzene 50U 62U 62U 62U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 50U 62U 62U 62U 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 50U 62U 62U 62U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 1000 120U 120U 120U Bromobenzene 90.5% 98.7% 101% 95.5% CAS Number Sample No. T -123 T -124 T -125 ARI ID 3047D 3047E 3047F Date Analyzed 05/30/89 05/30/89 05/30/89 Amt (Dry Wt) 0.077 g 0.077 g 0.085 g Units µg /Kg gg /Kg .tg /Kg 71 -43-2 Benzene 65U 65U 59U w 59U 108 -88 -3 Toluene 65U a U 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 110 65U 59U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 340 130U 1200 Bromobenzene 84.4% 94.1% 93.0% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Sediments /Soils QC Report No: 3047- GeoEngrs. Protect No: 1199-07 -4 Date Received: 05 /30/89 Data Release Authorized: L_ Report prepared: 05/31/89 - MAC:E Level: Low urrogate Recovery urrogate ecovery Value If the result Is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit, NR Analysis not required. Data Reporting Qualifiers Analytical Chemists & Consultants B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flag is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 2989 MB Method Blank 1 4.0 U 3047 A T-120 1 7 5 3047 B T-121 1 4 9 3047 C T -122 1 51 3047 D T -123 1 _ 6 4 3047 E T - 124 1 4.0 U 3047 F T-125 1 2 2 Matrix: Soil /Sediment QC Report No: 3047- GeoEngineers VTSR: 05 /30/89 Data Release Authorized 7 gig Data Prepared: MAC:C - J.V. 06/06/89 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - Modified EPA Method 418. 06)621 -6490 Dilution Lab ID Client Sample ID Factor Project: 1199.07.4 Date of Analysis: 06/02/89 Date Prepared: 06/02/89 TPH (ppm Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon values are reported in wet weight. Data Qualifier U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants John Biggane, Project Manager GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 -140th Avenue N.E., Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Dear John: Enclosed are the results of the on -site analyses of soil samples submitted on May 16th -24th, 1989 from Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Project. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this material, or if you just want to discuss any aspect of your projects, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, James K. Farr, Ph.D. JKF /jkf Enclosures anDart-a Fie May 28, 1989 GeoEngineers JUN -91999 Routing .Q. ..0. [� Corporation Scientists & Engineers (206) 455.2962 fax 451-8546 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th Street Bellevue, Washington 98004 Analytical Laboratory: ' 225.,112th Avenue NE (206) 453-8174 Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 16, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Ft- Benzene Sample # T -41 soil <1 <1 <1 T -42 soil <1 <1 <1 T -43 soil 4 <1 <1 T -44 soil 2 <1 <1 T -45 soil <1 <1 <1 T -48 soil 36 <1 15 T -51 soil .. <1 <1 <1 T -52 soil 34 <1 20 T -53 soil 31 9 7 T -54 soil 18 3 4 T -55 soil 40 8 19 T -56 soil <1 <1 <1 T -57 soil <1. <1 <1 T -58 soil 20 8 10 T -59 soil 45 15 16. T -60 soil 6 9 T -61 soil <1 <1 70. 7 2 icEl2917 Xylene nLP Q <1 <1 <1 1 <1 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 45 <1 <1 <1 100 19 9. < 1 21 < 1 120 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 66 <1 77 <1 40 4 <1 Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 16, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) $enzene Toluene Ft- Benzene Xylene Sample # W42 • • Q Ouality Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -45 (Duplicate) T -56 (Duplicate) T-45 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @50 ppb Percent Recovery 46% 44% 42% 44% 58% T -45 (Matrix Spike Duplicate) Spiked @ 50 ppb Percent Recovery 68% T- 56.:(Matrix.Spike) Spiked @100.ppb Percent. Recovery. T -56 (Matrix Spike Duplicate) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 84% RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 70% 59% 46% 75% 66% 68% 80% 40 %: 37% 44 % 73% 70% 72% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Et- Benzene (ylene Sample # ULI2 Q T -62 soil 19 <1 6 <1 59 T -63 soil 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -64 soil 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -65 soil <1 <1 2 5 2 T -66 soil 52 32 17 <1 54 T -67 soil 2 <1 <1 <1 65 T -69 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -70 soil 3 <1 <1 5 <1 T -71 soil 4 <1 <1 <1 3 T -72 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 36 T -73 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -74 soil 99 39 54 <1 130 4 - 72 C Ouality Assurance Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ag /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Ft- Benzene Xylene scrfoduz® m Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -65 (Duplicate) <1 <1 3 5 1 T -72 (Duplicate) <1 <1 6 <1 57 Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample it RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING. THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Et- Benzene T -65 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @50 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 110% 98% 100% 110% T -65 (Matrix Spike Duplicate) Spiked @50 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 110% 98% 100% 110% T -72 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @500 ppb Percent Recovery 94% 66% 52% 78% 57% T -72 (MSD) Spiked @ 500 ppb Percent Recovery 94% 64% 52% 86% 61% xylene W42. Q Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 18, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE 'HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene fit- Benzene Xylene Sample # rn,P Q T -75 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -76 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 3 T -77 soil <1 . <1 <1 <1 2 T-78 soil 6 11 8 77 29 .T-79 soil 2 <1 <1 • <1 6 Quality Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1' <1 <1 T -77: (Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T- 77:.(Matrix.Spike) Spiked @50 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 110% 96% 94% 96% T -77 (MSD) Spiked @50 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 19, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Et- Benzene Xylene Sample 4 nhp Q T -80 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -81 soil <1 <1 8 <1 21 T -82 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 52 T -83 soil 2 <1 <1 <1 4 Oua i y Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -82 (Duplicate) <1 <1 12 <1 36 T -82 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 130% 74% 58% 170 %a 75% T -82 (MSD) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 130% 64% 48% 190 %a 76% a - Interferences were present which hindered quantitation of the analyte indicated. 8 B ., .. Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 22, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Bt- Benzene Xylene Sample # m.p Q T-84 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -85 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -86 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T- 87•soil <1 <1 <1 <1 2 T -88 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -89 soil <1 3 <1 <1 5 T-90 soil. <1 <1 <1 <1 <1. T -91 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -92 soil 5 <1 5 <1 12 T -93 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 2 T-94 soil <1 <1 <1 3 <1 T -95 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -96 soil 4 5 3 10 7 CQZ1T9d1PW Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 22, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE 'HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) Benzene Toluene Et- Benzene Xvlene Sample # aLa Q Ouality Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -88 (Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -91 .(Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -95 (Duplicate) <1 <1 2 <1 <1 T -88 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 98% 94% 94% 91% T-88 (MSD) Spiked @100 ppb Percent: Recovery 95% 84% 72% 68% 68% T -95 Matrix Spike) Spiked '6100 ppb Percent Recovery. 94% 75% 56% 53% 67% T -95 :(MSD) . Spiked 0100 ppb Percent Recovery 100% 85% 68% 66% 79% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 23, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES O ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX. AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) benzene Toluene Ft- Benzene Xylfa m.p Q < 1 <1 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 8 <1 3 . <1 38 T -100 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -101 soil 28 <1 12 <1 120 T. -102 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 51 <1 <1 <1 <1. <1 T -104 soil 18 <1 79 <1 <1 T -105 soil 11 <1 <1 T -106 soil 22 <1 54 <1 97 Sample # T -97 soil T -98 soil T -99 soil. Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 23, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) benzene Toluene fit- Benzene Xylene Sample if in.p Q Ouality Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -98 (Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -99 (Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 55 T -105 (Duplicate) 12 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -99 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery. 110% 95% 140% 320 %a 110% T -99 (MSD) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 100% 93% 120% 250 %a 180% T -103 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @ 100ppb Percent Recovery 140% 120% T -103 (MSD) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery .130% 120% 150% 250 %a 170% a - Interferences were present which interfered with quantitation of the analyte indicated. 12 •B -:80 130% 260%a 180% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: June 1, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR BTX AND ETHYLBENZENE USING THE HEADSPACE METHOD Results Reported as ng /g (ppb) $enzene Toluene Etz Benzene Xylene Sample 4 m,p a T -107 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 19 T -108 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -109 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -110 soil <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -111 soil <1 <1 2 <1 <1 Ouality Assurance Method Blank <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T -109 (Duplicate) <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 T-109 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 110% 80% 43% 36% 68% T -109 (MSD) Spiked @100 ppb Percent Recovery 120% 110% 46% 71% 97% 13 B - 81 a71291 Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 16, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample 4 RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC AS DIESEL #2 T -41 soil <50 T -42 soil <50 T -43 soil <50 T -44 soil 100 T -45 soil <50 T -46 soil 600 T -47 soil 1,000 T -48 soil 1,600 T -50 soil 600 T -51 soil <50 T -52 soil 500 T -53 soil <50 T -54 soil 50 T -55 soil 3,000 T -56 soil <50 T -57 soil <50 T -58 soil 300 T -59 soil 300 T -60 soil 300 T -61 soil <50 14 82 Total Petroleum Bydrocarbons (PPm) anuATw Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 16, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample •# ual Assurance Method Blank T -45 (Duplicate) <50 T-48 (Duplicate) 1,600 T -56 (Duplicate) <50 T -45 . (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1000 ppm Percent Recovery T-56 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1000. ppm Percent Recovery RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) <50 100% 100% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample 4 T -62 soil T -63 soil T -64 soil T -65 soil T -66 soil T -67 soil T-69 soil T--70 soil T-71 soil T -72 soil T -73 soil T -74 soil RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC 16 Total Petroleum ,Hydrocarbons (ppm) 300 <50 <50 <50 1,000 <50 <50 <50 <50 3, 000 100 3,000 Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 17, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC Ouality Assurance Method Blank T -65 (Duplicate) T -72 (Duplicate) T -65 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1000ppm Percent Recovery T -72 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1000 ppm Percent Recovery a - The amount spiked was insufficient to give meaningful recovery data. 17 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ppm) <50 <50 3,000 100% a ciziavarr®&, Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 18, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.). RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC Sample # Total Petroleum I1ydrocarbons (PPm) T -75 soil <50 T -76 soil <50 T -77 soil <50 T -78 soil 50 T -79 soil 50 Ouality Assurance Method 'Blank <50 T- 77..(Duplicate) <50 T -77 .(Matrix Spike) Spiked @1000 ppm Percent Recovery 100% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 19, 1989 Project: Bedford. Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC T -80 soil T -81 soil T -82 soil T -83 soil Ouality ,Assurance Method Blank T -81 .(Duplicate) T -82 ` (Duplicate) T -82 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000 ppm Percent Recovery Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) <50 500 800 <50 <50 500 1,000 100 %. Date of Report: May 28, 1989. Date Submitted: May 22, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC T -84 soil <50 T -85 soil <50 T-86 soil <50 T -87 soil T -88 soil T -89 soil T -90 soil T-91 soil T -92 soil T -93 soil T -94 soil T -95 soil T -96 soil 20 B -.88 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) 300 <50 <50 <50 <50 300 <50. <50 <50 <50 cauavIzr®Q Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 22, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) ,$amp1JL Quality Assurance Method Blank <50 T -88 (Duplicate) <50 T- 91 (Duplicate) <50 T -95 (Duplicate) <50 T -96 (Replicate) <50 T-88 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000 ppm Percent Recovery T -95 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000 ppm Percent Recovery RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PPm) . 100% 100% Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 23, 1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC T -97 soil <50 T -98 soil <50 T -99 soil 300 T -100 soil <50 T -101 soil 500 T -102 soil 300 T -103 soil. 500 T -104 soil 100 T -105 soil 100 T -106 soil 100 Ouality Assurance Method Blank <50 T -99 (Duplicate) 300 T -103 (Duplicate) 500 T -99 (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000 ppm Percent Recovery T -103 Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000 ppm Percent Recovery 22 B - 90 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (ppm) 70% 150% sguawd Date of Report: May 28, 1989 Date Submitted: May 24,1989 Project: Bedford Properties (Tukwilla, WA.) Sample # RESULTS OF ANALYSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS BY TLC Total Petroleum drocarbons (ppm) T -107 soil 500. T -108 soil 100 T -109 soil 100 T -110 soil 50 T -111 soil <50 Ouality Assurance Method Blank <50 T -109 (Duplicate) 300 T -109. (Matrix Spike) Spiked @1,000.ppm Percent Recovery 180% • Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples at of Containers Analyses Required Comments 7 se; l 1 1 MN( 1 - Y - (1 1 1 7. ,r5 - 1 - _'1 1, , 1 i TP H (T c . TP1 -. Lc .0 t- x ;fi! :Y T-�) so , 1 Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Received y:.(S ' i NAME : / : -/ hi:Yr- L /�-/ Date: -3 ' 1(- --�`/ 1 Time- T imQ • i Cr` -k �1i ;;r, FIRM- � _ FIRM: Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Received by: (Signature) NAME Date: Time: Time- FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros' Client: FIRM: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record DATE: 16 --Kei SITE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: I (ICirt er)fer1 PROJECT LOCATION: Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples : of Containers Analyses Required Comments —.S .c 1 /1 - i c 'JX T S-1 / - 1 -`'Y 3., � 7 & I e- Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date T1me• Receive by: (Stgnature) NAME: 1T /' '/" /, ji .`J Date: S-��' i Time' . J .'(') ^r)i , _ FIRM. L •t; .' FIRM Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME- / Date Time: FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Envlros' Client: SAMPLED BY: DATE: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-2962 S=16- S`I Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record PROJECT NAME: t - r/ +f { )"rnOk'r l� t PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: If `i`� 7-y Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples : of Containers Analyses Required Comments 7 V• 5 r j-/ ( 7 f'// /-f / y -_ (<1 ; -c 5'; ( Tl (• 7 PH / -'T ..1" i Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: T1mP• Receive By: Signature) �'1 NAME: / /ll ( 1l /; �' . fit ' Date: S ---- e , -- _ TimP• S . 1 ( 1 0 1 _ FIRM- 1'"r) l„ r �' � FIRM: Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME / Date Time FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros' Client: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 Chain of Custody Record DATE: 5 " 1 -k"`! Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453-8174 PROJECT NAME: / ; PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples : of Containers Analyses Required Comments 7- ( `i "C;. i - PII TLC 01 T 11 ( 1---1?). ) 7= 7y 5 1 1 TPII ( 7 - Lc) l t -/ ma=r Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time- Received by:,(S gnu r ,�. � f �j ,, NAME: Date: j TimP• / .)70 ^/n FIRM- Fril V. r•' 1 FIRM Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME Date Time Received by: (Signature) NAME Date:_ Time: FIRM- FIRM: Envtros Corporation Envtros' Client: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments- Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record DATE: `� � -,� SITE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: -- 1 k, �/.'Pi r: r PROJECT LOCATION: Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples * of Containers Analyses Required Comments 'Co, 1 Tr'/1 ( %� h'7 /• x 7-7-77 c C . 0.1 r r , I 1 Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Receive•?'': (gignature) . NAME: - ' 2 r' // Date: /lam , ?�' u •• u - I C.JC?rr : r• _ 1 ', ',,; FIRM Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME- Date Time- FIRM FIRM: Envlros Corporation Enviros' Client: Enviros Corporation SAMPLED BY: DATE: Additional Comments: 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record PROJECT NAME: / 7 R' PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples s ot Containers Analyses Required Comments - -_ s'C, So 1 1 77)/J T[- C ?� (t = "v T -;'<1 Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time- Received ,16 ( igture) / 1 , NAME ' ' r ,- '1f ' (l(( /// Date: '/ � `/ TimP• 1/ . ?00 01 FIRM- ffil Li • r :`, • FIRM: Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME: Date Time FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros* Client: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record DATE: `' —/ `( 1•) V i � 1 PROJECT NAME: -7 /2 ' %- - e f r7 PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: // Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples : of Containers Analyses Required Comments J=y Sot ( -! Y-) T -`I . . y T 4 70 ) T-(11 . Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time• Received : 51 naf ire) ,- .,/ , I /r/ / < 1� �J NAME:. � Date: r � V TtmP• 4 7' Seim FIRM- j- r t< <+f" `: FIRM Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME: Date: I Time: FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros' Client: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments: DATE: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custody Record PROJECT NAME: SITE NUMBER: p 1(p / 9 PROJECT LOCATION: Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples a of Containers Analyses Required 1 Comments T:.f; ' S , 1 TP/1(7 /(• j - . ;•f l ,"( i <;`, 7 `S Relinquished NAME: by: (Signature) Date: Time- Receive ily:.(S1Opathre) . � % )(/ f ;/ , r� NAME: Y1(( . / /� /i , /, �r�/ 1 Date: • -- . e-9 T1mP• /• !-)( ii -, FIRM- Fir 1% I( r; FIRM Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME Date Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME Date Time: FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros' Client: SAMPLED BY: Additional Comments: DATE: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -2962 Chain of Custody Record 5 =, 15'c? Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453-8174 PROJECT NAME: 7 � f'4 ►(1 A. le is PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: 1/ f/- L/ Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples s of Containers Analyses Required Comments `i' 5,- - L 1 /^ tt - Till (1 L < I C I I' l . 'n,' 7 `i-`i i"- /c-f •. i 1 5.,;1 I , "1('l 1 ("r L / 1 ta l / Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: T1mP• Receive' dt I By: / i (S nature) /- NAME:, X- s- i ' (: ((c r `J . ;. Date: . 7 - 2? <S _ T1mP• ' . 1 / , . 1 _--i i v �, - FIRM• ,- FIRM- Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME: / Date. Time - FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros' Client: i 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -2962 SAMPLED BY: DATE: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporation Chain of Custody Record Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 1 iny2er 11 PROJECT NAME: I " `- � PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: /17 %. • (' 17/ Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples a. of Containers Analyses Required Comments / • I ., '- LC r , lf l _ /(_, , ( �- /(•. '_ • / .t Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time- Receive &y: ( Signature) � NAME: ;, _ (.:11, :;/ Date: ",- = ?' - P2 _1 Time- ! 1, - 1 % FIRM- / ; I • • • FIRM: Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME: Date Time FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Enviros Client: Additional • Comments: Enviros Corporation 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455 -2962 Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chairs of Custody Record SAMPLED BY: DATE: 5:- X �/ PROJECT NAME: br ( (C e�� .ies PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: <<- r 11 Sample Number Date /Time Sampled Type of Samples of Containers Analyses Required Comments ie ),,;( 1 TM !l ( - i.. x - 1 1 ( 1 111 >,:,1 1 Ti/ii 'L ( i ;// - 1 Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: o Date: Time- l Received . ( igna. Pe) NAME. _ ` fi - ( J ; Date: � - -2�r TimP• : ; ) . f il . 1--1 FIRM- j=- " FIRM: Relinquished by: (Signature) NAME: Date: Time: Received by: (Signature) NAME:. Date: Time- FIRM: FIRM: Enviros Corporation Envlros' Client: 600 Skyline Tower 10900 NE 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 455-2962 SAMPLED BY: DATE: Additional Comments: Enviros Corporat Laboratory: 225 112th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98004 (206) 453 -8174 Chain of Custod Record PROJECT NAME: ,(-`-( PROJECT LOCATION: SITE NUMBER: / f �� < ..- = �_ L( SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206) 922.2310 • FAX (206) 922- 5047 Report To: GeoEngineers Date: April 7, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 5749 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 4 -6 -89 Project: 1199 -07 -4 Bedford, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Laboratory Sample No. Client Identification Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Xylenes Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Concentration, mg /kg Rush 1 MW -1 < 0.05 <•0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 5.0 Analysis Procedures: BTEX by EPA SW -846 Method 8020. TPH by EPA SW -846 Method 418.1, Rush 2 MW -2 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 5.0 S. UND A ICAL SERVICES A - 103 Th s report is issued solely for the use of the person, or company to Whom h Is addressed: This laboratory accepts resporuibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance With industry acceptable practice: In no event shall Sound Analytical Services. Inc. or its employees be responsible for consequential or special damages in any kind or In any.amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Benzene < 0.05 < 0.05 - -- Toluene < 0.05 < 0.05 - -- Ethyl Benzene < 0.05 < 0.05 - -- Xylenes < 0.05 < 0.05 - -- Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons < 5.0 < 5.0 - -- SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Lab No: Date: Client: Client ID: Sample matrix: Units: QUALITY CONTROL REPORT A 5749 April 7, 1989 GeoEngineers MW -2 Soil mg /kg DUPLICATES *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 Compound Spiked Sample Result (SSR) Sample Result (SR) Spike Added (SA) %R* Benzene 0.29 < 0.05 0.22 109 Toluene 0.31 < 0.05 0.22 118 Ethyl Benzene 0.25 < 0.05 0.22 90.9 Xylenes 0.69 < 0.05 0.65 98.5 Total. Petroleum Hydrocarbons 108 < 5.0 106 97.1 Lab No: Date: Client: Client ID: Sample matrix: Units:. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5037 %R = percent. recovery [(SSR - SR) / SA] x 100 A 5749 April 7, 1989 GeoEngineers MW -2 Soil mg /kg SOUND .ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. . QUALITY CONTROL REPORT MATRIX SPIKES J' Anol ticalTechnolo !e5 �nc. 560 Noches Avenue. S.W.. Suite 101. Renton. WA 08055. (206) 228.8335 r = te , y 5 , > April 20, 1989 Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 14 655 Bel-Red Road Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98007 Attention : Kurt. Anderson Mar Silva GC emist FWG /hbb ATI I.D. n 8904 -003 APR 24 1989 GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. Seattle, Washington Project Number : Boeing Project Name : Seattle, WA On April 3, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received five soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager L AnolyticoiTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. PROJECT n : BOEING PROJECT NAME : SEATTLE, WA ATI A CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8904 -003 -1 BOS -MW1A SOIL 04/03/89 8904 -003 -2 BOS -MW1B SOIL 04/03/89 8904 -003 -3 BOS -MW1C SOIL ' 04/03/89 8904 -003 -4 BOS -MW1D SOIL 04/03/89 8904 -003-5 BOS -MW1E SOIL 04/03/89 MATRIX n SAMPLES SOIL 5 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. ATI I.D. n 8904 -003 AnolylicotTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT : GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. PROJECT n BOEING PROJECT NAME : SEATTLE, WA ANALYSIS • ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI I.D. x 8904 -003 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED - 108 AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT n PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD. COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. BOEING SEATTLE, WA REAGENT BLANK SOIL. 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 04/05/89 DATE ANALYZED. : 04/07/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS 5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. n 8904 -003 AnolyticoiTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD • COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. BOEING SEATTLE, WA BOS -MW1C SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON.RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING B - 110 DATE SAMPLED 04/03/89 DATE RECEIVED : 04/03/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 04 /05/89 DATE ANALYZED : 04/15/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. n 8904 -003 -3 LAnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. PROJECT NAME : SEATTLE; WA EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : BLANK 4/5 B COMPOUND SAMPLE CONC SPIKED RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE FUEL HYDROCARBONS <5 500 428 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result Sample Result) FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA B - 111 REC ATI I.D. # 8904 -003 DATE EXTRACTED : 04/05/89 DATE ANALYZED : 04/15/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP DUP SPIKED Ps SAMPLE RECOVERY RPD 86 392 78 Average Result X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) 9 X 100 SAMPLE IDENTITY Sampiea / / f r r / . !•`j ? ni ?A ••,iI A .1....r. 4 ? 7 ,X X ! ei4 N., 1 12 4 . . V. t x - 130 '� f 'I - 5 - 1M to I � - ? r X a Total No. of Bottles! Containers r .. - 4 ./�yJ &' • TILLER, INC. � Gra :Water Consultants Project Number T - -' • ; — r — =- Project Location A k t. Laboratory -47 T . Sampler(s) Ye:. 4 Date ;RAIN -OF CU''"OUY RECORr SAMPLE BOTTLE / CONTAINER DESCRIPTION ,; / :%J TOTAL Relinquished by Organization- Received by Organization: Date / / Time Date 1 / Time Seal Intact? Ycs" No N/A Seal Intact? Yes No N/A / '_Time /' Relinquished by;_ � ..� ,7J.nd er n .� Date 4 3_lj n _ Organization: T —��-^" y � Received by: It /i ( r. r`! r, — Organization: �l / Date / l � Time / � Special lnstractions/Remarks: - • Delivery Method: In Person ❑ Common Carrier ❑ Lab Courier ❑ Other SPECIFY srEC1FY 5 th .r+ 07.2067 t• ••f...... MI A 11117 L AnalyticalTeehrlologies,InC. 560 Naches Avenue. S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055. (206) 228.8335 May 18, 1989 Routing tha D 0 Geoengineers, Inc. D D 0 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : Project Name : Bedford Properties On May 4, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mar C. Silva GC emist FWG /nah ATI Y.D. # 8905 -031 .„1-. gager/ MAY 2 2 1989 GeoEngineers Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager LAnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL . 2 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8905 -031 -1 B -3; S -2 (AP. ") SOIL 05/03/89 8905 -031 -2 B-4; S -2 (mw -1) SOIL 05/03/89 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 The . samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control .department before the scheduled disposal date. AnalyticalTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES ANALYSIS. ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD PURGEABLE AROMATICS GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 / \ Anolytic°:Technologies,inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # - PROJECT NAME BEDFORD PROPERTIES CLIENT I.D. : REAGENT BLANK SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8020 RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3— DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2— DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4— DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE 'META &.PARA XYLENE ORTHO. XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY :SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0. 025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 97 ATI I.D. n 8905 -031 DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 05/05/89 DATE ANALYZED : 05/08/89 UNITS mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS, BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : BEDFORD PROPERTIES : B -3; S -2 : SOIL : 8020 RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 75 ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 -1 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : 05/03/89 05/04/89 05/05/89 05/08/89 mg/ Kg 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES CLIENT I.D. : B -4; S -2 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8020 RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE 1,.2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE • META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE RURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED : DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0. 025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 92 ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 -2 05/03/89 05/04/89 05/05/89 05/08/89 mg /Kg 1 AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. SAMPLE I.D. : SAND I (4/28) PROJECT # : - DATE ANALYZED : 05/04/89 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8020 UNITS : mg /Kg COMPOUND PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA DUP DUP SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED % RESULT ADDED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD BENZENE <0.025 0.400 0.422 106 0.433 108 3 CHLOROBENZENE <0.025 0.400 0.416 104 0.433 108 4 TOLUENE <0.025 0.400 0.418 105 0.446 112 6 META & PARA XYLENE <0.025 1.10 1.02 93 1.11 100 8 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 X 100. RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample. Result - Duplicate Result) B - 119 Average Result X 100. AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD : COMPOUNDS •FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. BEDFORD PROPERTIES REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : N/A N/A 05/05/89 05/08/89 mg /Kg 1 AndyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : - BEDFORD PROPERTIES : B-3; S-2 SOIL : 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS. QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING B - 121 .FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY ATI I.D. # 8905-031-1 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL 05/03/89 05/04/89 05/05/89 05/08/89 mg/Kg 1 Anolyficollechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT ## PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX. EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS:QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING .FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : BEDFORD PROPERTIES B -4; S -2 : SOIL : 8015 MODIFIED ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 -2 DATE SAMPLED : 05/03/89 DATE RECEIVED : 05/04/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 05/05/89 DATE ANALYZED : 05 /09/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL Ano!ytical rechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : BLANK 5/3 COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SAMPLE CONC SPIKED RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE 500 584 REC DATE EXTRACTED : 05/03/89 DATE ANALYZED : 05/05/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 117 629 126 % Recovery = ( Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Average Result ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 X 100 DU P RECOVERY RPD 7 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ .(Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 AnolyticoiTechnologies,inc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES .GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 MOISTURE. 0 26 23 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg <1.0 6.3 ATI I.D. tt 8905 -031 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL AnalyticolTechnologies,inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTIES GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC MOISTURE % 8905 -021 -1 15 15 0 N/A N/A N/A MOISTURE % 8905 -038 -4 5.4 5.5 2 N/A N/A N/A PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8905 -036 -1 31 31 0 75.2 62.6 71 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) 125 Average Result X 100 ATI I.D. # 8905 -031 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 PROJ. MGR. ) 0 1t n 13 ,' c n e ANALYSIS REQUEST NUMBER OF CONTAINERS COMPANY GE 0 / -rill C-. BASE /NEU /ACID CMPOS.I GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPOS, GC /MS/ 624/8240 PESTICIDES /PCB 608/8080 r LYNUCLEAR OMATIC 610/8310 PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS' 604/8040 HALOGENATED VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 [ TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 FUEL HYDROCARBONS 8015 e o (U) SA PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS 113) CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (8) SWDA•INORGANICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE ADDRESS — X I ( ` S No /. /VIE 1IJ SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. P -3, s -Z 5 -3 2.:1S 0;1 - 1 X p ,L/ J s -Z 5 -3 f r. -0 .5o: l — - PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT RELINQUISHED BY 1. `2 , /,< / / 0 �. fr • (Signature) _ r (Time) J t �— � RELINQUISHED BY 2. )Signature) (Time) RELINQUISHED BY 3. (Signature) (Time) PROJECT: J �i , / / cr �• C 5 TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS I Z CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS h PO NO. RECD GOOD CONDITION /COLD './ (Pr�i[ ted Name) (Date) (.F0 L- rI ll,. 11 0'r, - 5_ (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) SHIPPING ID. N0. CONFORMS TO RECORD LAB N n �ns f ( / - / (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY (LABORATORY) 3. � �� �� � l r 11 I ��) �!/ ` SPECIAL (INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: A 5 17 ( Signature) (Time) tSi nature) (Time) ( i ure) T. e) /L�C� �`t�G r� (Panted Name) )Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name ((Company) • (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. Analyi 560 Naches Avenue. S.W., Suite 101, Renton. WA 98055 ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458 -9141• PHOENIX (602) 438 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228 - 8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE. CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • PINK - DATE Chain of Custody PAGE / / L AnalyticalTeChnologies,lnc. 560 Naches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228.8335 May 15., 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : Project Name : Bedford Property On May 3, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Ma C G Chemist FWG /nah File ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 GeoEngineers MAY 17 1989 4?rP Routing ...rJ 8 Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager ilAnotyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY ATI,# CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8905 -022 -1 B -1, S -2 (p%w -3) SOIL 05/03/89 8905 -022 -2 B- 2,S- 2 (ynw -7) SOIL 05/03/89 MATRIX ## SAMPLES SOIL 2 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. 4# 8905 -022 The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our .sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. J \ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # ..- PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI S.D. # 8905 -022 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD PURGEABLE AROMATICS GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 AnalyticalTechnoiogies,Inc, CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE.MATRIX EPA METHOD 'RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE • 1,.3••DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO ;XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. :BEDFORD PROPERTY : REAGENT BLANK : SOIL 8020 DATE SAMPLED . DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED. : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0. 025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 N/A N/A 05/03/89 05/04/89 mg /Kg 1 • LAnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,.2- .DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES. BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY. : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : BEDFORD PROPERTY B -1,S -2 : SOIL : 8020 DATE SAMPLED 05/03/89 DATE RECEIVED : 05/03/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 05/03/89 DATE ANALYZED : .05/04/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 95 ATI I.D. # 8905 - 022 -1 AnalyticoiTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY CLIENT I.D. : B -2,S -2 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8020 RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 -2 DATE SAMPLED : 05/03/89 DATE RECEIVED 05/03/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 05/03/89 DATE ANALYZED : 05/04/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <0. 025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0. 025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 99 Ana(yticoiTechnotogies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME EPA METHOD COMPOUND BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA GEOENGINEERS, INC. : - : BEDFORD PROPERTY : 8020 SAMPLE RESULT <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.400 0.422 0.400 0.416 0.400 0.418 1.10 1.02 SAMPLE I.D. . DATE ANALYZED : SAMPLE MATRIX : UNITS % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) DUP DUP. SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED % ADDED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) 133 106 0.433 104 0.433 105 0.446 93 1.11 AverageResult ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 X 1 0 0 SAND I -4/28 05/04/89 SOIL mg/ Kg 108 3 108 4 112 6 100 8 X 1 00 L AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : BEDFORD PROPERTY REAGENT BLANK : SOIL : 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 N/A N/A 05/01/89 05/03/89 mg /Kg 1 AnalyticaIYechnologies,lnc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. : SAMPLE. MATRIX EPA METHOD . COMPOUNDS GEOENGINEERS, INC. BEDFORD PROPERTY B -1,S -2 SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING .FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR.: RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI T.D. # 8905 -022 -1 05/03/89 05/03/89 05/01/89. 05/04/89, mg/ Kg 1 AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : BEDFORD PROPERTY : B -2 , S -2 : SOIL : 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING .FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL. ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 -2 05/03/89 05/03/89 05/01/89 05/04/89 mg/ Kg 1 AnolyticolTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : BLANK 5/1 COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS SAMPLE CONC SPIKED RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA 500 609 REC DATE EXTRACTED : 05/01/89 DATE ANALYZED : 05/03/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 122 618 124 Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 X 1 00 DU P RECOVERY RPD Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) Average Result X 1 0 0 Ano -GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # . - PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg <1.0 <1.0 MOISTURE 21 23 ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL Analytico Technoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD PROPERTY GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL. ATI SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8905 -036 -1 31 31 0 75.2 62.6 71 MOISTURE 8904 -150 -3 17 18 6 N/A N/A N/A % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Average Result X 100 ATI I.D. # 8905 -022 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 PROJ. MGR TO &" g' J ' r-::: ANALYSIS REQUEST 1 NUMBER OF CONTAINERS COMPANY - BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPDS. GC /MS/ 624/8240 I PESTICIDES/PCB 8/8080 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC 610/8310 PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS 604/8040 HALOGENATED VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 TOTAL ORGANIC HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS 418 • PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (13) I CAM METALS (181 TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (8) SWDA•INORGANICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE �,._ r >�ik� ,; t ,_ ADDRESS Syr . <,/ ,Ai -7. 'r 7/ .'U(, -'_; 1,,, -• SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. C, -I l '_2 r — ) ` ,n. I —/ � 3 - ,5 --) 5 -3 Wit,; 1 ;.2 ?� x x / \ PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT RELINQUISHED BY 1. ' J , ,• it • �. I k' (Signature) (Time) -J ' , i , 1„ 1 /!. 17: '; RELINQUISHED BY 2. p (Signature) ,r (Time) RELINQUISHED BY 3. (Signature) (Time) PROJECT: , T OTAL % ?.,,..:,_ .1 NO. OF CONTAINERS 2 CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS ?1_ t P0 NO. RECD GOOD CONDITION /COLD 7 1 Namel (Date) ( -4 ,. r ,, ,-; , p , , - 7p•_ . ? •`7 (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) SHIPPING ID. NO. CONFORMS TO RECORD \� / LAB NO. �p'( // I -_ ` � J . (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. RECEIVED BY (LABORATORY) 3. 1�/�/ /� / '' SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: ( //,'' ' ` r:;-._ �f/T h J /G /4 �. /_ (1i?I i , / t S / .-- • ' ° ' v . -c j L am . / ° r(0/ r %_U ( v (Signature) (Time) (Signature) (Time) 4S1g ature) Time). ' :r�I ( (. - (.. `,/ ,. (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) j (Company) (Company) ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. AnalyticalTechnologil San Diego • Phoenix • Seattle ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458-9141 PHOENIX 16021 438 -1530 DATE -- in of Custody PAGE / DISTRIBUTION: WHITE. CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. • PINK - ORIGINATOR ti alTechnoio ies Inc. �Anay c � June 19, 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Mary ilva GC em'st FWG /nah 560 Noches Avenue. S.W.. Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228-8335 ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 GeoEngineers JUN 2 1 1999 Routing f n ..............�� ..... ❑:.,... File ....................... . ................. ..... ..... Attention : John Biggane Project,Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name : On June .2, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality . control, data are enclosed. 14.k.&eked W IT Frederick. W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT .# : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8906 - 039 -1 MW -8 SOIL 06/08/89 8906 -039 -2 MW -9 SOIL 06/08/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 2 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage.period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. ATI S.D. # 8906 -039 AnolyticaiTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD BETX GC /PID EPA 8020 MOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD 7 -2.2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 AnclyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT. NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -07 -4 : REAGENT BLANK SOIL : 8020 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 97 ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 N/A N/A 06/13/89 06/13/89 mg/ Kg 1 d AnalyticaiTechnologies,Inc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - CLIENT I.D. : MW -8 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8020 (BETX) RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO.XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS : DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 -1 06/08/89 06/08/89 06/13/89 06/13/89 mg /Kg 1 AnolyticolTechnologies, inc. CLIENT' • PROJECT • PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE. MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE .TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199-07-4 MW-9 : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 81 ATI I.D. # 8906-039-2 DATE SAMPLED : DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : 06/08/89 06/08/89 06/13/89 06/13/89 mg/Kg 1 di AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - EPA METHOD : 8020 (BETX) SAMPLE SPIKE COMPOUND RESULT ADDED BENZENE 0.031 CHLOROBENZENE <0.025 TOLUENE 0.028 META & PARA XYLENE 0.17 . PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA 0.400 0.400 0.400 1.10 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample. Result) SPIKED % SAMPLE REC 0.389 0.406 0.402 1.22 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 SAMPLE I.D. : 8906 -032 -2 DATE ANALYZED : 06/12/89 UNITS : mg /Kg MATRIX : SOIL 90 102 94 96 Average Result DUP DUP SPIKED % SAMPLE REC RPD 0.407 0.407 0.407 1.22 X1 00 94 102 95 96 Duplicate Result) 5 0 1 0 X 100 )� AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - .GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 MOISTURE 20 24 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg <1.0 <1.0 ATI I.D. # 8906 -039 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL PROJ. MGR V U I NUMBER OF CONTAINERS COMPANY (1 'c--.0 1 n { S BASE /NEU /ACID CMPDS. GC /MS/ 625/8270 VOLATILE CMPDS. GC /MS/ 624/8240 PESTICIDES /PCB 608 /8080 POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC 610/8310 PHENOLS, SUB PHENOLS' 604/8040 HALOGENATED I VOLATILES 601/8010 AROMATIC VOLATILES 1 602/8020 TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON 415/9060 !TOTAL ORGANIC I HALIDES 9020 PETROLEUM I HYDROCARBONS 418 FUEL 1 HYDROCARBONS 8015 cw k . 1x13 �� y PRIORITY POLLUTANT METALS (13) I CAM METALS (18) TTLC /STLC EP TOX METALS (8) SWDA•INORGANICS PRIMARY /SECONDARY 1 HAZARDOUS WASTE PROFILE _ ADDRESS ?L(' "y I { � , - + f ilre NC. SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) (PHONE NO.) SAMPLE ID. DATE TIME MATRIX LAB ID. rtGJ 9 _ V • - I i . i _ 1 PROJECT INFORMATION SAMPLE RECEIPT RELINQUISHED BY 1. ;; - �1 J t! 6 1' f<� (Sulnature) (T me 1 RELINQUISHED BY 2. (Signature) (Time) RELINQUISHED BY 3. (Signature) (Time) PROJECT: r ,� • J . i _` _ • t TOTAL NO. OF CONTAINERS 4 CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS PQ NO. RECD GOOD CONDITION /COLD V ti S k'' -- J 1. ^1 S( r, (1 11? 141 (Printedame) (Th( (Date) 1( (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) SHIPPING ID. NO. CONFORMS TO RECORD LAB NO. 6( 01 _ 0 , 3 0 i "I (Company) (Company) (Company) VIA: RECEIVED BY 1. RECEIVED BY 2. E E VED BY ( B O A O Y) 3.. V( o) f.�i/I !(� '0r SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS /COMMENTS: 1" :N W\ W ,r due 04-/81 (Signature) (Time) (Signature) ( Time) ty+J orb--) (Tir (h S+ e ( / }Y (P red- Worpe) (Printed Name) (Date) (Printed Name) (Date) (Company) (Company) ANALYITIC TECHNOLOGIES. INC. L i \ AnalyticalTechnologiE 560 Nachos Avenue, S.W., Suite 101. Renton, WA 98055 in of Custody DATE (,) 12 h 1. 7 PAGE 1 ATI LABORATORIES: SAN DIEGO (619) 458- 9141•PHOENIX (602) 438- 1530•SEATTLE (206) 228-8335 DISTRIBUTION: WHITE, CANARY - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • PINK - APPENDIX C Analytical Results For Ground Water Samples AnalyticalYechnoiogies,lnc, 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055. (206) 228 -8335 April 14, 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : Roy Jenson Project Number : 1199 -7 -4 Project Name : - Mary 1 GC Cv. = mist FWG /hbb APPEND I X C ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 Routing GeoEngineers APR 1 8 1589 File D __ ................ On March 24, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two water samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager 0 AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8903 -118 -1 MW -1 WATER 03/24/89 8903 - 118 -2 MW -2 WATER 03/24/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES WATER 2 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 Analy$icalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS PURGEABLE.AROMATICS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD GC /PID EPA 602 IR EPA 418.1. ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - CLIENT I.D. : REAGENT BLANK SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER EPA METHOD : 602 COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS . DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 105 N/A N/A N/A 03/28/89 ug /L 1 COMPOUNDS 2 ,AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1,3- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META &•PARR XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -7 -4 MW -1 : WATER : 602 'SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 106 ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 -1 03/24/89 03/24/89 N/A 03/28/89 ug /L 1 AnalyiicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - CLIENT I.D. : MW -2 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER EPA METHOD : 602 COMPOUNDS BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE 1, 3-- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 -2 DATE SAMPLED : 03/24/89 DATE RECEIVED : 03/24/89 DATE EXTRACTED : N/A DATE ANALYZED : 03/28/89. UNITS ug /L DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5. 105: AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # : PROJECT NAME : EPA METHOD . COMPOUND BENZENE <0.5 CHLOROBENZENE <0.5 TOLUENE <0.5 META & PARA XYLENE <0.5. GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -7 -4 602 PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SAMPLE SPIKE RESULT ADDED 8.00 8.00 8.00 21.9 7.83 7.73 7.77 21.4 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) 98 97 97 98 ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 SAMPLE I.D. : 8903 -118 -1 DATE ANALYZED : 03/28/89 UNITS : ug /L MATRIX : WATER DUP DUP SPIKED % SPIKED, % SAMPLE REC SAMPLE ,REC RPD 8.11 7.95 7.65 22.4 X 100 101 99 96 102 Duplicate Result) 3 2 1 4 X 100 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc, CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER. GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS UNITS -1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /L <0.05 <0.05 ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER LAndocarrechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI ATI I.D. # 8903 -118 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8903 -116 -2 0.20 0.20 0 4.19 5.14 78 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) C -9 Average Result X 100 X 100 O \ Anol f icolTechnolo ieS InC. 560 Nacnes Avenue. S.W . Suite 101. Renton, WA 08055. (206) 228- y g i ) 8335 April 28, 1989 Geraghty & Miller, Inc. 14655 Bel -Red Road Suite 202 Bellevue, WA 98007 Attention : J.A. Smith Project Number : - Project Name :Gateway Drive, Tukwila On April 4, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received one water sample for analyses. The sample was analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mary S va GC emist FWG /hbb ATI I.D. tt 8904 -009 Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET CLIENT : GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. PROJECT n . -. PROJECT NAME : GATEWAY DRIVE, TUKWILA ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8904 -009 -1 BCU -MW3 -1 WATER 04/04/89 MATRIX n SAMPLES WATER 1 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control. department before the scheduled disposal date. ATI I.D. n 8904 -009 . 4 BETX ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE CLIENT GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. PROJECT .tt - PROJECT NAME : GATEWAY DRIVE, TUKWILA GC /PID EPA 602 ANALYSIS TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD ATI T.D. # 8904 -009 LAnolyticalTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT . PROJECT n . PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD . COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE " META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE: SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES • BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. GATEWAY DRIVE, TUKWILA REAGENT BLANK WATER 602 (BETX) DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 102 ATI I.D. n 8904 -009 N/A N/A N/A 04/06/89 ug /L 1 AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. GATEWAY DRIVE, TUKWILA BCU -MW3 -1 WATER 602 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 105 ATI I.D. tt 8904 -009 -1 04/04/89 04/04/89 N/A 04/06/89 ug/L 1 AnolyticolTechnologies,Inc. PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA ATI I.D. 4 8904 -009 CLIENT GERAGHTY & MILLER, INC. SAMPLE I.D. : 8903 -148 -7 PROJECT n DATE ANALYZED : 04/05/89 PROJECT NAME : GATEWAY DRIVE, TUKWILA SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER EPA METHOD : 602 (BETX) UNITS : ug /L COMPOUND DUP DUP SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED % RESULT ADDED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD BENZENE <0.5 8.00 7.58 95 7.58 95 0 CHLOROBENZENE <0.5 8.00 7.40 93 7.38 92 0 TOLUENE 1.5 8.00 8.57 88 8.55 88 0 META & PARA XYLENE 0.8 21.9 20.8 91 20.2. 88 3 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result -- :Duplicate Result) X 100 C - _ 15 Average Result X 100 Relin uishe q y Received try: 4 ¶'4 ?— Organization: ! �I :--/ Date 9 / `1 /79 Time 12 = SO Seal Intact? � (es) No N/A � _ , � Organization 1• Date c / / i I� � Time � / / -- • s 0 �' 4 Relinquished by: Organization: Date / / Time Seal Intact? Yes No N/A Organization: Date / Time Received by alt ?& MILLER, INC. Gr 1- 1Varcr Consultants Project Number Project Location WI: J D{, ruhittd4 Laboratory i r Sampler(s) 1.f r A • 51A4411A Date SAMPLE IDENTITY Sampled CCU –M143 v Total No. of Bottles/ Containers 2— 2, Special Instructions/Remarks T� oi(LLv\^ I cx (M ) r,Q Delivery Method: ;F1 In Person ❑ Common Carrier ❑ Lab Courier ❑ Other SPECIFY srcaFY sn .n+nn 6 c.r.0 rnrm 01A Ill 17 CHAIN-OF-C1' TOM RECOF 1 ! ~/ SAMPLE BO' I LE / CONTAINER DESCRIPTION ///// TOTAL rage ___J or May 19, 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen Geo Engineers 2405 - 140th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98005 Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. David R. Mitchell Project Manager DRM /th cx-0 nitteA-6(4" enclosures cc: file #2943 GeoEngineers MAY 2 0 1989 Routing Filo 0 0 RE: Project #1199-07-4; ARI project #2943 Dear Mr. Jensen: Per your request, please find enclosed a revised copy of the above referenced project. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please feel free to give me a call anytime. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Bik, MW -4 MW -5 MW -6 MW -7 ARIID 0510MB 2943A 2943B 29430 2943D Date Analyze. 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 05/10/89 Amt Analyzed 5.0 mis 2.5 mis 2.5 mis 2.5 mis 2.5 mis Units 4g /L 4g /L tg /L 4g /L 4g /L 71 -43 -2 Benzene 1.0 U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0 U 2.0 U 108 -88-3 Toluene 1.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 2.0U 100.41 -4 Ethylbenzene 1.0U 2,0U 2.0U NU 2.0U 1330 -20-7 Total Xyienes 2.0U 8.7 4.0U 6.3 4.0U Bromobenzene 107% 95.4% 100% 97.9% 101% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Water Level: Low Data Release Authorized: Date Received: Report revised: 05/18/89 - MAC :E Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value, Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. NR Analysis not required. urrogate Recovery Data Reporting Qualifiers B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flag Is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. C - 18 QC Report No: Project No: 2943- GeoEngineers 1199 -07 -4 Bedford 05/08/89 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 2943 MB Method Blank 1 0.5 U 2943 A MW -4 1 0.5 U 2943 B MW-5 1 0.7 2943 C MW -6 1 0.5 U 2943 D — MW -7 1 0.5 U TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS Modified EPA Method 418.1 Matrix: Waters Data Release Authorized Data Revised: 05/18/89 - MAC:E 1 2 3 4 5 Lab ID Client Sample ID Factor Project: 1199 -07 -4 Bedford QC Report No: 2943- GeoEngineers VTSR: 05/08/89 Date of Analysis: 05/09/89 Date Prepared:. 05/09/89 Dilution TPH (ppm Values reported in ppm (mg/L) U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave, North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 L AnalyticalTethe'tologi es,lnc. 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228.8335 June 20, 1989 GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : 1199 -7 -4 Project Name Bedford Tukwila On June 14, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received two water samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. t k Donna M. McKinney Metals Chemist FWG /hbb ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA MATRIX # SAMPLES WATER 4 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8906 -058 -1 MW-8 WATER 06/12/89 8906 -058 -2 MW -9 WATER 06/12/89 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30)1 days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the 'scheduled disposal date. - 21 ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # :'1199 -7 -4. PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA ANALYSIS BETX PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE GC /PID EPA 602 ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD IR EPA 418.1 AnolyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META &. PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE . • PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199-7-4 BEDFORD TUKWILA REAGENT BLANK WATER 602 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE ATI I.D. # 8906-058 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED : DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 95 N/A N/A N/A 06/16/89 ug/ L 1 ki LAnalyticarechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE ..TOLUENE: META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -7 -4 BEDFORD TUKWILA MW -8 WATER 602 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 88 ATI T.D. # 8906 -058 -1 : 06/12/89 : 06/14/89 : N/A : 06/16/89 . ug /L COMPOUNDS AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -7 -4 : BEDFORD TUKWILA : MW -9 : WATER : 602 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED : 06/12/89 DATE RECEIVED : 06/14/89 DATE EXTRACTED : N/A DATE ANALYZED : 06/16/89 UNITS : ug /L DILUTION FACTOR 1 RESULTS <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 116 ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 -2 LAnalyiicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA EPA METHOD : 602 (BETX) COMPOUND BENZENE CHLOROBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE SAMPLE RESULT <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SPIKE ADDED 12.0 12.0 12.0 21.9 DUP DUP SPIKED % SPIKED % SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD 13.5 13.5 13.9 25.0 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 SAMPLE I.D. : 8906 -056 -1 DATE ANALYZED : 06/14/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : WATER UNITS : ug /L 113 13.1 113 13.4 116 13.3 114 24.1 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X Average Result X 100 109 3 112 1 111 4 110 4 100 4 11 AnalyticolTechnoiogies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT it : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA PARAMETER GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS UNITS -1 -2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /L <0.05 <0.05 ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 SAMPLE' MATRIX : WATER AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -7 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC. PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /L 8906 -051 -5 <0.05 <0.05 0 N/A N/A N/A PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /L BLANK SPIKE N/A N/A N/A 3.24 5.03 64 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8906 -058 SAMPLE• MATRIX : WATER SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % X100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) AnaiyticalTechnologies,Inc. 5550 Morehouse Drive • San Diego. CA 92121 -1709 PROJECT MANAGER: COMPANY: rh 1 ADDRESS: BILL TO: 1 t7 rr; COMPANY: ADDRESS: 141 I j ;�, SAMPLERS: (Signature) (Z L 7 ( ) 1 ( 4 - Szd� PHONE NUMBER SAMPLE ID DATE TIME AI MATRIX LAB ID LI v —I ctr -2- 8 0 0 0 N O m 0 0 O Recommended Quantity and Preservative (Provide trip e volume on OC Samples) 1 • • • Inniumin• MINIM MEM Minn MEM MEu MEM BMW U 0 0 E x v t N 0 U _ n 0 E m 0 a N w x F 3 0 0 0 0 O - o 0 m c ` 0 0 O CO _C2 g 0 m . c O CD .D m o ` .0 N 8 U E 0 X N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 sf Cr) a 0 a E U m co U 1 1 • MI II NI II MI II NM • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • <TOTAL:NUMBER`AF: CONTAIN PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: VIA TAT: 0 24H 048HRS Comments: E CTIN ORMA 1WK ❑2WKS INTACT? :RECEIVED :GOOD COND.1 Chain of Custody LAB NUMBER T "I n(0 , CY) MAT! Disposal @ $5.00 each ❑ Return ❑ Pidcup (will can) 1 EUNQUISHED B' 4 m4O U,C-i ted Name: C ( /NI omp % y: ; FIE CE VE D:BY: Signature: Printed Name: Company: Time: Date: LINQUISHED: Signature: Printed Name: Company: AEC ENED: B l Signature: Printed Name: Company: DATE / `� ( PAGEL OF J Time: Date: Time: Date: LINQUISH Signature: Printed Name: Company: REC ENED BY: Time Mr"). ,n Anrial�Technologies, Inc. Ali LADORATOR.ES: San Diego (619) 458 -9141 • Phoenix (602) 438.1530 • Seattle (206) 228 -8335 DISTRIBUTION: White. Canary - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. • Fink • ORIGINATOR Time: Date: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 5047 Report To: GeoEngineers Report On: Analysis of Water IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 3 -29 -89 Project: 1199 -07 -4 Bedford - Tukwila ANALYSIS: Laboratory Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: WR -1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /1 Benzene, ug /1 Toluene, ug /l Ethyl Benzene, ug /1 Xylenes, ug /1' Date: March 30, 1989 Lab No.: A 5650 . GeoEngineers APR - 3 1989 Analysis Procedures: TPH by EPA Method 418.1 BTEX by EPA SW -846 Method 8020 STAN P. PALMQUI Routing .... �� 0 ❑ =a 0 Fite 275 26.4 18.3 < 1.0 31.2 SOUND •.'LYTICAL SERVICES A AL- C - 30 This report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom II Is addressed, This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with industry acceptable practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services, Inc, or its employees be responsible for consequential or special damages in any kind or In any nmount. SAMPLE No. DATE SAMPLED TIME SAMPLED DEPTH OF SAMPLE TYPE OF SAMPLE FIELD FILTERED PRESERVATIVE ADDED TO SAMPLE ANALYSES TO BE CONDUCTED NO. OF SAMPLE CONTAINERS COMMENTS wR- 3129 - H-2. TM J t - rx . RELI e SH NOME s FIRM ____&:: ____&:: Z `( GNATURE) DATE 1/2- �l 1 TIME /(- ( D / 4- 1 `1 /( RECEIVED ` {(SIGN(` URE) NAME c� FIRM __z,45 z a DATE :340 % TIME // ffjy RELINQUISHED BY(SIGNATURE) NAME DATE TIME RECEIVED BY(SIGNATURE) NAME FIRM DATE TIME FIRM ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: - C1/11/1 P I° SAMPLED BY GEOENGINEERS INC. 2405 - 140th AVE. N.E.. SUITE 105 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON $ 005 206 746 - 3200 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD DATE _ 3J22L PROJECT LOC. L u � PROJECT NAME Deci }-d GET FILE NO. -0 C SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC IIIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 11.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: GeoEngineers Date: April 3, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Water Lab No.: A 5686 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 3 -31 -89 Project: 1199 -07 -4 Bedford, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Laboratory Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: WR -2 Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Xylenes Concentration, ma /1 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 20 UND ANA Routing Fit. 0.005 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.015 STAN P. PALMQUIS GeoEngineers APR 1989 ICAL SERVICES IJ n C —.32 This report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory eccs pts responsibility only for the due performance o(annlysis in accordance with Industry acceptable practice In no event then Sound Annl)1ica1 Scniccs, Inc, or its employees be responsible for consequential pr special dansa8es In any kind or in nay amount. GEOENGINEERS INC. 2405 - 140th AVE. N.E., SUITE 105 BELLEVUE WASHINGTON 98005 c -� 7�" ) 206-746-5200 PROJECT LOC. - 1: 4 - 414Li SAMPLED BY j t • _1 CHAIN OF CUSTODY ' CORD PROJECT NAME jekd _ DATE C - -- _.2 45( GEI FILE NO. 0 - 07'- SAMPLE No. DATE SAMPLED TIME SAMPLED DEPTH OF SAMPLE TYPE OF SAMPLE FIELD FILTERED PRESERVATIVE ADDED TO SAMPLE ANALYSES TO BE CONDUCTED NO. OF SAMPLE CONTAINERS COMMENTS -JE.- Z 313//0 I( i Psi & r t Z RE I t516 r (SIGNATURE) NAME _t FIRM LQ - D - T •3 31 g TIME pc.„) J PECE I cIE BY S I' N E) J r NAME _ _ -77 '�/ FI> M - / - -- . _ /1 DAT TIME ) RELINQUISHED PY(SIGNATURE) NAME DATE TIME RECEIVED BY(SIGNATURE) NAME FIRM DATE TIME ,I FIRM ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: I c GEOENGINEERS INC. 2405 - 140th AVE. N.E., SUITE 105 BELLEVUE WASHINGTON 98005 c -� 7�" ) 206-746-5200 PROJECT LOC. - 1: 4 - 414Li Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush 3 Rush 4 Client Ill W -3 SP -1 SP -2 SP -3 Matrix Water Soil Soil Soil Benzene 0.375 0.12 < 0.05 < 0.05 Toluene 0.515 1.45 0.20 0.23 Ethyl Benzene 0.080 4.72 0.09 0.13. Xylenes 0.435 25.5 0.89 0.95 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 420 5,498 630 2,458 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310. FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Geoengineers Date: March 24, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Water & Soil Lab No.: IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 3 -23 -89 Project: 1199 -7 -4 ANALYSIS: Concentration, ppm Continued A 5StoEngineers MAR 2 7 1989 Routing f n Filo its report Is Issued solely for the WC of the person or company to whom It is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysts In accordance with Autry acceptable practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services, Inc. or Its employees be responsible for consequential or special damages In any kind or in any amount. C -34 Lab Sample No. Rush 5 Rush 6 Client ID 89321 -1 89322 -1 Matrix Soil Soil Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 50 12 Geoengineers Page 2 of 2 Lab No. A 5594 March 24, 1989 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Concentration, ppm Analysis , Procedures: BTEX by EPA SW -846 Method 8020 TPH by EPA Method 418.1 UND ICAL SERVICES STAN P. 'ALMQUIS his report is issued solely for the use arise parson or compnny. to N'itont it is addressed. 'Ms laboratory acccpts responsibillly only (or the duc per(ormnncc o(annlysis In occordancc with IdusIry acccptublc practice. In no event ~hall Sound Anaytical Services; Inc. or Ity cmployccesbe cspori.ibic for comcqusnlial or spccinl dmmngcs in any kind or In nny amount. • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 0.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206) 922.2310 • FAX (206) 922- 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 5594 Date: March 24, 1989 Client: Geoengineers Lab Sample No: Rush 2 Client ID: SP -1 Sample matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Compound Sample (SL Duplicate (D) RPD* Benzene 0.12 0.14 15.4 Toluene 1.45 1.52 4.7 Ethyl Benzene 4.72 4.59 2.8 Xylenes 25.5 26.1 2.3 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 5,498 5,602 1.86 *RPD = Relative Percent Difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)) x 100 his report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed, This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with idustry acceptable practice, In no event shall Sound Anstalical Services, Inc. or Its employees be responsible for consequential or spcclhl damages in any kind or In any amount. C —.36 SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206) 922.2310 • FAX (206) 922. $037 Lab No: A 5594 Lab Sample No: Rush 2 Sample matrix: Soil Compound Benzene Toluene Ethyl Benzene Xylenes SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons .* %R = Percent Recovery = ((SSR - SR) / SA] x 100 Spiked Sample Result (SSR) QUALITY CONTROL REPORT MATRIX SPIKES 0.32 1.66 4.93 26.04 5,559 Date: March 24, 1989 Client ID: SP -1 Units: mg /kg Sample Result (SR) 0.12 1.45 4.72 25.50 5,498 Spike Added (SA) 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.57 50 111 94.7 122 This report b tssucd soicly for the use of the pcison or company to whom It Is addressed, Thts laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with • industry acceptable practice. In no cvenr shall Sound Anahlical Services, Inc. or Its employees be responsible for conscqucnlla1 or special damages In any kind or in any nmounl. • Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Blk, W -3 W -3 RE 2933DRE ARI ID 0504MB 2933D Date Analyzed 05/04/89 05/04/89 05/04/89 Amt Analyzed 5.0 mis 0,125 mis 0.625 mis Units µg /L µg /L µg /L 71 -43 -2 Benzene 1.0 U 260 150 108 -88 -3 Toluene 1.0 U 140 55 100.41 -4 Ethylbenzene 1.0 U 40U 8.0 U 1330-20-7 Total. Xylenes 2,0U 140 71 Bromobenzene 106% 106% 91.5% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602 /8020 FOR BEIX Matrix: Water Level: Low Data Release Authorized: Report prepared: 05/05/89 - MAC :E NR Analysis not required. Surrogate Recovery Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit, QC Report No: 2933 - GeoEngineers Protect No: 1199-07-4 Date Received: 05/04/89 Data Reporting Qualifiers K This flag is used when quantitated value . falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. 38 This flag is used when the analyte Is found in the blank as well as the sample, Indicates possible /probable blank contamination ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 VTSR: 05/04/89 Reported in ppm (mg /L) Report prepared 05/11/89 on MAC: C jv Data Release Authorized GeoEngineers, Inc. ARI Job #02933 Oil and Grease Analysis Client I.D. ARI Samnle No. 011 & Grease W - 3 2933 D Total - 10.0 ppm Method Blank 2933 MB 5.0 U ppm DATA QUALIFIER U Indicates compound was not detected above listed detection limit. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists 8 Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 May 19, 1989 Mr. Roy Jensen GeoEngineers 2405 - 140th Ave NE Bellevue, WA 98005 clut)4 R ikitteevall David R. Mitchell Project Manager DRM /th enclosures cc: file #2980 GeoEngineers MAY 2 0 1989 Routing ❑ 0 0 0 File RE: Project #1199 -07 -4; ARt project #2980 Dear Roy: Please find enclosed a copy of the analyses of the above referenced project. If you have any further questions or require additional information, please feel free to give me a call anytime. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 1 EXPLANATIONS OF INORGANIC DATA REPORT CODES THE COLUMNS LABELED 'PREP', 'C', AND 'M' CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR ANALYSES. THE CODES ARE 333 Ninth Ave. North DEFINED BELOW. Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621.6490 PREP CODES THE 3- LETTER CODES IN THIS COLUMN ARE USED TO DESCRIBE THE METHOD USED TO PREPARE THE SAMPLE FOR ANALYSIS. THE FIRST LETTER OF THE CODE STANDS FOR THE MATRIX TYPE OR THE FRACTION OF THE SAMPLE THAT IS BEING ANALYZED: A = AN AIR FILTER SAMPLE. C = A CLAY OR EARTHENWARE SAMPLE. D = THE DISSOLVED FRACTION OF A SAMPLE (FILTERED THROUGH A 0.45 p MEMBRANE FILTER.) E = THE EP TOXICITY FRACTION OF A SAMPLE. F = A PROCEDURE FOR DIGESTING FISH, OR OTHER TISSUE. M = A DIGESTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS SAMPLES NOT FITTING IN NORMAL CATEGORIES 0 = A DIGESTION OF AN OIL, GREASE, OR TAR. P = A WIPE SAMPLE. R = A WATER SAMPLE PREPARED BY A 'TOTAL RECOVERABLE' DIGESTION. S = A DIGESTION OF A SOIL OR SEDIMENT SAMPLE. T = A WATER SAMPLE PREPARED BY A 'TOTAL' DIGESTION. W = A SAMPLE ANALYZED WITHOUT ANY PREPARATION. 5 = A SAMPLE FILTERED THROUGH A 5.0 R FILTER THE MIDDLE LETTER OF THE CODE RELATES TO THE SOURCE OF THE PROCEDURE. C CODES A = THE CURRENT AOAC MANUAL. C = THE USEPA CLP PROGRAM STATEMENT OF WORK. E = THE USEPA 1979 WATER AND WASTEWATER MANUAL. H = A METHOD DEVELOPED BY ARI. M = A COMMON PROCEDURE FOUND IN A MANY SOURCES. P = THE PUGET SOUND ESTUARY PROTOCOLS. S = STANDARD METHODS. W = THE USEPA SW -846 SOLID WASTE MANUAL. A = A PROCEDURE FOR ARSENIC AND SELENIUM ANALYSIS ONLY. C = A HYDROCHLORIC ACID MATRIX. F = A HYDROFLUORIC ACID DIGESTION. H = A PROCEDURE FOR MERCURY ANALYSIS ONLY. N = A NITRIC ACID MATRIX. P = A PERCHLORIC ACID DIGESTION. 0 = AN AQUA REGIA DIGESTION R = A SPECIAL 'SOFT' DIGESTION OF A SOLID. 6 = A METHOD FOR MEASURING HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM P1 CODES THESE CODES SIGNIFY THE TYPE OF INSTRUMENTAL TECHNIQUE USED WHEN ANALYZING THE SAMPLES. THE CODES ARE DEFINED BELOW: CVA = COLD VAPOR AAS FLA = FLAME AAS GFA = GRAPHITE FURNACE AAS ICP = 1CP-AES ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants THE LAST LETTER OF THE PREPARATION CODE REFERS EITHER TO THE FINAL MATRIX OF THE PREPARED SAMPLE OR TO , A SPECIALIZED USE OF THE PROCEDURE. THESE CODES ARE USED TO QUALIFY THE REPORTED CONCENTRATIONS. A CODE OF 'L' MEANS NO ANALYTE WAS DETECTED AT THE REPORTED CONCENTRATION LEVEL. CAS Number Analyte Concentration C Prep M 7440 -38 -2 Arsenic 0.05 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -43 -9 Cadmium 0.002 mg /L L. TWC ICP 7440 -47 -3 Chromium 0.005 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -50 -8 Copper 0.005 mg /L TWC ICP 7439 -92 -1 Lead 0.03 mg /L L •TWC ICP 7439-97-6 Mercury 0.0001 mg /L L TMM CVA 7440 -02 -0 Nickel 0.01 mg /L TWC ICP 7440 -22 -4 Silver 0.003 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -66 -6 Zinc 0.168 mg /L TWC ICP Client: Contact: Project: ID number: Description: Sampled: Matrix: GEOENGINEERS ARI job number: 2980 ROY JENSEN ARI sample number: E 1199-07 -4 W -4 / / WATER ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. Inorganic Laboratory Data Report 05/17/89 13:06:00 Released by: A N A L Y T I C A L R E S U L T S CAS Number Analyte Concentration C Prep M 7440 -38 -2 Arsenic 0.05 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -43 -9 Cadmium 0.002 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -47 -3 Chromium 0.005 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -50 -8 Copper 0.002 mg /L L TWC ICP 7439 -92 -1 Lead 0.03 mg /L L TWC ICP 7439 -97 -6 Mercury 0.0001 mg /L L TMM CVA 7440 -02 -0 Nickel 0.01 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -22 -4 Silver 0.003 mg /L L TWC ICP 7440 -66 -6 Zinc 0.010 mg /L TWC ICP Client: Contact: Project: ID number: Description: Sampled: Matrix: / / WATER ANALYTICAL. RESOURCES, INC. Inorganic Laboratory Data Report 05/17/89 13:06:15 A N A L Y T I C A L RESULTS GEOENGINEERS ARI job number: 2980 ROY JENSEN ARI sample number: MB 1199 -07 -4 METHOD BLANK Released by: /WW 2980 MB Method Blank 1 0.5 U 2980E W-4 1 0.5 U TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS - Modified EPA Method 418.1 Matrix: Water QC Report No: 2980 VTSR: 05/15/89 Dilution Lab ID Client Sample ID Factor TPH (ppm) Data Qualifier U Indicates compound was analyzed but not detected at the given detection limit DATA RELEASE AUTHORIZED REPORT PREPARED: MAC: C- J.V. (5/19/89) ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants Client: GeoEngineers Project: 1199 -07 -4 Date of Analysis: 05/17/89 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 90109.5187 (206) 621 -6490 Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample No. Method Bik. W-4 Trip Blank ARI ID 0516MB 2980E 2980E Date Analyzed 05/16/89 05/16/89 05/16/89 Amt Analyzed 5.0 mis 5.0 mis 5.0 mis Units µg /L 4g /L µg /L 71-43-2 Benzene 1.0U 1.0U 1.0U 108 -88 -3 Toluene LOU 1.0U ._ -- 1.0U 100.41 -4 Ethylbenzene 1.0U 1.0U 1.0U 1330-20-7 Total Xylenes 2.0 U 2.0U 2.0 U - Bromobenzene 92.9% 80.8% 90.7% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BEIX Matrix: Water Level: Low NR Analysis not required. Data Release Authorized: Report prepared: 05/17/89 - MAC :E urrogate Recovery Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. Data Reporting Qualifiers QC Report No: 2980- GeoEngrs. Project No: 1199 -07 -4 Date Received: 05/15/89 B This flag is used when the analyte is found in the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flag is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109-5187 (206) 621.6490 C CODES M CODES A = THE CURRENT AOAC MANUAL. C = THE USEPA CLP PROGRAM STATEMENT OF WORK. E = THE USEPA 1979 WATER AND WASTEWATER MANUAL. H = A METHOD DEVELOPED BY ARI. M = A COMMON PROCEDURE FOUND IN A MANY SOURCES. P = THE PUGET SOUND ESTUARY PROTOCOLS. S = STANDARD METHODS. W = THE USEPA SW -846 SOLID WASTE MANUAL. A = A PROCEDURE FOR ARSENIC AND SELENIUM ANALYSIS ONLY. C = A HYDROCHLORIC ACID MATRIX. F = A HYDROFLUORIC ACID DIGESTION. M = A PROCEDURE FOR MERCURY ANALYSIS ONLY. N = A NITRIC ACID MATRIX. P = A PERCHLORIC ACID DIGESTION. 0 = AN AQUA REGIA DIGESTION R = A SPECIAL 'SOFT' DIGESTION OF A SOLID. 6 = A METHOD FOR MEASURING HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM EXPLANATIONS OF INORGANIC DATA REPORT CODES PREP CODES THE 3-LETTER CODES IN THIS COLUMN ARE USED TO DESCRIBE THE METHOD USED TO PREPARE THE SAMPLE FOR ANALYSIS. THE FIRST LETTER OF THE CODE STANDS FOR THE MATRIX TYPE OR THE FRACTION OF THE SAMPLE THAT IS BEING ANALYZED: A = AN AIR FILTER SAMPLE. C = A CLAY OR EARTHENWARE SAMPLE. D = THE DISSOLVED FRACTION OF A SAMPLE (FILTERED THROUGH A 0.45 µ MEMBRANE FILTER.) E = THE EP TOXICITY FRACTION OF A SAMPLE. F = A PROCEDURE FOR DIGESTING FISH, OR OTHER TISSUE. K = A COPRECIPITATION PROCEDURE M = A DIGESTION FOR MISCELLANEOUS SAMPLES NOT FITTING IN NORMAL CATEGORIES 0 = A DIGESTION OF AN OIL, GREASE, OR TAR. P = A WIPE SAMPLE. R = A WATER SAMPLE PREPARED BY A 'TOTAL RECOVERABLE' DIGESTION. S = A DIGESTION OF A SOIL OR SEDIMENT SAMPLE. T = A WATER SAMPLE PREPARED BY A 'TOTAL' DIGESTION. W = A SAMPLE ANALYZED WITHOUT ANY PREPARATION. 5 = A SAMPLE FILTERED THROUGH A 5.0 µ FILTER THE MIDDLE LETTER OF THE CODE RELATES TO THE SOURCE OF THE PROCEDURE. ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants THE COLUMNS LABELED 'PREP', 'C', AND 'M' CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR ANALYSES. THE CODES ARE 333 Ninth Ave. North DEFINED BELOW. Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206)621.6490 THE LAST LETTER OF THE PREPARATION CODE REFERS EITHER TO THE FINAL MATRIX OF THE PREPARED SAMPLE OR TO A SPECIALIZED USE OF THE PROCEDURE. THESE COOES ARE USED TO QUALIFY THE REPORTED CONCENTRATIONS. A CODE OF 'L' MEANS NO ANALYTE WAS DETECTED AT THE REPORTED CONCENTRATION LEVEL. THESE CODES SIGNIFY THE TYPE OF INSTRUMENTAL TECHNIQUE USED WHEN ANALYZING THE SAMPLES. THE CODES ARE DEFINED BELOW: CVA = COLD VAPOR AAS FLA = FLAME AAS GFA = GRAPHITE FURNACE AAS ICP = ICP -AES Instrument ID: GC /PID CAS Number Sample. No. Method Bik. W -5 ARI ID 0531 MB 3047G Date Analyzed 05/31/89 05/31/89 Amt Analyzed 5.0 mis 5.0 mis Units µg /L µg /L 71 -43 -2 Benzene 1,0U 1.5 108 -88 -3 Toluene 1.0U 1.0U 100.41 -4 Ethyibenzene 1.0U 1.2 1330 -20-7 ,Total Xylenes 2,0 U 8.3 Bromobenzene 106% 111% ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET - Method 602/8020 FOR BETX Matrix: Water Level: Low Data Release Authorized: fa Report prepared: 06/02/89 - MAC:E NR Analysis not required. Surrogate Recovery Value If the result is a value greater than or equal to the detection limit, report the value. U Indicates compound was analyzed for but not detected at the given detection limit. QC Report No: 3047- GeoEngrs, Project No: 1199 -07 -4 7 Date Received: 05 /30/89 Data Reporting Qualifiers ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants B This flag Is used when the analyte Is found in the blank as well as the sample. Indicates possible /probable blank contamination K This flag is used when quantitated value falls above the limit of the calibration curve and dilution should be run. 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 GeoEngineers, Inc. ARI Job #03047 Oil and Grease Analysis VTSR: 05/30/89 Reported in ppm (mg /L) Report prepared 06/06/89 on MAC: C jv Client I.D. ARI Sample No. Oil & Grease W- 5 3047 G 5.0 U ppm Method Blank 3047 MB 5.0 U ppm DATA QUALIFIER U Indicates compound was not detected above listed detection limit. Data Release Authorized •, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Analytical Chemists & Consultants 333 Ninth Ave. North Seattle, Wa 98109.5187 (206) 621.6490 CAS Number Analyte Concentration C Prep M 7440 -38 -2 Arsenic 0.05 mg /L L DMN ICP 7440 -43 -9 Cadmium 0.002 mg /L L DMN ICP 7440 -47 -3 Chromium 0.013 mg /L DMN ICP 7440 -50 -8 Copper 0.024 mg /L DMN ICP 7439 -92 -1 Lead 0.03 mg /L L DMN ICP 7439 -97 -6 Mercury 0.0001 mg /L / L DMM CVA 7440 -02 -0 Nickel 0.01 mg /L L DMN ICP 7440 -22 -4 Silver 0.003. mg /L L DMN ICP 7440 -66 -6 Zinc 0.004 mg /L L DMN ICP Client: Contact: Project: ID number: Description: Sampled: Matrix: ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. Inorganic Laboratory Data Report 06/09/89 10:48:58 GEOENGINEERS ARI job number: 3047 JOHN BIGGANE ARI sample number:G 1199 -07 -4 W -5 / / WATER A N A L Y T I C A L Released by: /kW R E S U L T S CAS Number Analyte Concentration C Prep M 7439 -97 -6 Mercury 0.0001 mg /L L DMM CVA Client: Contact: Project: ID number: Description: Sampled: Matrix: / / WATER ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. Inorganic Laboratory Data Report 06/09/89 10:49:13 GEOENGINEERS ARI job number: 3047 JOHN BIGGANE ARI sample number: MB 1199 -07 -4 METHOD BLANK A N A L Y T I C A L R E S U L T S Released by! gat) • APPENDIX D Analytical Results For Treated Soil Lab Sample No. 1 2 3 4 Client ID SSGC -1 SSGC -2 SSGC -3 SSG -4 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 78.5 15.6 7.9 59.6 . SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. • SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424. TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 3041. Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 11, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -5 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG ANALYSIS: Analysis Procedures: TPH by EPA Method 418.1 T1.1. .......w L f......1 enl. k, fn. 11.. to • APP END I X D Lab No.: A 6744 JUL 13 RECQ A 11fti. nnA. fn. nwnnr.lnnM Wll Lab No: A 6744 Client ID: SSGC -2 Date: July 11, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg Compound SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN ENDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample(S) 15.6 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Duplicate(D) 18.1 *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 RPD* 15% SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 5-14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 -TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 10, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6770 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -6 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: Sample B Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 Lab Sample No. Rush 2 Client ID: Sample .0 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND , ALYTICAL ERVICES 25.9 46.7 D - 3 „;.` This report Is Issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom It is addressed This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In accordance with industry accepinblepractice. In no event shall Sound AnaMIcnl Services. In or its employees be responsible for cnnsequentla! or spccinl damn.cs in any Lind or in nnv nmounh Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 46.7 44.5 4.8 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, surrE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 6770 Date: July 10, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: Sample C Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush 3 Client ID SSG -6 SSG -7 SSG -8 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 52.6 26.4 28.0 • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSI•RIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 11, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6795 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -10 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG Time -DC, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Analysis Procedures: TPH by EPA Method 418.1 S U D :• ' ICAL SERVICES I Q TAN P. PALMQUI 0 - 5 'his report Is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it 4 addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In eaordencc with Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 52.6 45.3 15% SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIOHWAY EAST, SUITE 844, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 9M24 , TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 6795 Client ID: SSG -6 Date: July 11, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference ((S " D) / ((S + D) / 2)) x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 12, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6828 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -12 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -9 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 41.3 STAN P. PALMQU SOUND ANA_ TICAL SERVICES Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 41.3 34.3 18.5 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE •14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 6828 Client ID: S -9 Date: July 12, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush 3 Rush 4 Client ID S -300 S -350 S -400 S -10 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 119 118 40.6 78.6 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -13 -89 Project: 89 -2489, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 11.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 17, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6841 Analysis Procedures: TPH by EPA Method 418.1 3-3o0 S -35 o. 0 S-000 Are Tor �- es'f- rc..+s 4410UND ANAL ICAL SERVICES. S AN P. PALMQUIS This report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In accordance with Inda:my acceptable practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services. Inc. or its employees be responsible for consequential or Rpecia damages in any kind or In any amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 40.6 36.85 9.8% SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 0.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)9224310 • FAX (206)922.5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 6841 Date: July 17, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -400 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = [ (S - D) ./ ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424.TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 14, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6865 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7- 14 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -11 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 30.0 OUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIST This report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom iris addressed. This la accepts responsibility ooly for the due performance of analysis in accordance with ..�.... ..1... . __...__, c... /,... L.. ... u. nrnn1, .... M rsmncil.l. fnr pnncwnnwnlinl nr.nr.tinl , .mnnec in nnv kind nr In • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922 - 3047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 14, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6865 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7-14-89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -11 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 30.0 OUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIST • D. 12 This report b fuued solely for, the use of the person or company to whom, It is addressed. This laboratory accepts rmponsibility.oaty for Ihe'due performance of analysts In accordancr‘with Indust nccetuabie practice. In no event shalt Sound AnaMlcal Services. Inc, or its empinyecs be responsible fnr consequentInl nr t pccinI demnges in nny kind In any amount, SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.3047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 17, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No. :. A 6886 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -17 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -12 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 23.3 Lab Sample No. Rush 2 Client ID: S -13 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 19.7 OUND __.TICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQU ' T D - 13 report is issued solely for the usa of the person or company to whom it b addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In accordance with SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUrrE B -14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Envrionmental Date: July 18, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6898 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -18 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S-14 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 26.0 SOUND AN , CAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIST D - 14 Thts report is Issued aolety, for the use of the person or company to whom it Is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with s.,n,..,n, n.. nninhie nmcllce. In nn even, .r„u c,;..,.,, A..,.ir, nt sr,vlces. Inc. or its employees be responsible for consequential or Aperial damnses In any kind or In nny amount. SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY. CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 6898 Client ID: S -14 Date: July 18, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons RPD* 11.0% Sample(S) 26.0 Duplicate(D) 23.3 *RPD = relative percent difference = ((S D) / ((S -+ D) / 2)] x 100 J SOUND AINALYI'ICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUrTE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE EPHONE (206)922 -2310 • FAX (206)972- 3047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: July 21, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 6951 IDENTIFICATION: Sample Received on 7 -20 -89 Project: 89 -2482, SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. 1 Client ID: S -15 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, by EPA Method 418.1 JUL 24RECp 46.5 UND ANALY CAL SERVICES P. PALMQUIST A - 16 nie iwrv,et 1.1 t tu. 4 M.h, fnr ,1.. ,n ,ul.n,r, 11 k eddre sed. This Iahnr.lnn, •creel' resoorulbil(tV aniv for the due oerfnrmanae of enahr is in nrrordance with Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Lab No: A 6951 Client ID: S -15 Date: July 21, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg Sample(S) 46.5 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Duplicate(D) 41.0 *RPD = relative percent difference j(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 RPD* 12.6% Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush 3 Rush 4 Client Identification S -17 S -18 S -19 S -20 Matrix Soil Soil Soil Soil Total. Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 43.3 72.5 37.4 15.2 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: August 29, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab Na.: A 7408 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 8 -28 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Analysis Procedures: TPH by EPA Method 418.1 UND ANAL TICALSERVICES STAN P. PALMQUISC' A -'18 This report h issued solely for I be use of the person or comoanv to whom it Ls addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 72.5 69.4 4.4 Lab No: Date: Client: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITES-14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 A 7408 August 29, 1989 Olympus Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 Client ID: S -18 Matrix: Soil Units:. mg /kg UL Tf9l�1 LNV.. KUNMLN I HL R_ • 1 —Oct r.j11 ILL No.206- 854 -5107 IDENTIMATION : Samples. Received on 8-29-89 Project: RUSH 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila Client ID: 8-21 Feb 1.90 17:20 No.004 P.02 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. sPECIALIZtNG IN INpugratAL & TOXIC WASTI3 ANALYSIS 1630 PACIFIC 11101I WAY BAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINOTON 98124 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.3617 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: August 29, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 7431 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, 48.8 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND- • NALXTICA SERVICES RRY • D - 20 his teporl is tuned solely (or the use.of the person or company to v.hom It Is addressed, 'MU latsrumory accepts reeponslhiIlty only, for the duc performance of AnAlysIs In saonlnnce. wlth $UM,y Acrepte Weller. In no cvcnl ahnq Sound A nAlytIcnl Selvkas, Inc ,, or,11s employees be responslhlc for consequcnitnl or ApecIAI dmmnges In Any kind or In Any Amount. SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 5.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.3047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: August 30, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soi]. IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 8 -30 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila WA Client ID: Rush S-22 ANALYSIS: Lab No.: A 7446 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, 61.3 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND AN YTICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQU IT : Thls repot% 4 issued solely for tbduse of the person or company to whom it o addressed. This laboratory accept responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 61.3 57.1 7.1 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUJTE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A 7446 Date: August 30, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -22 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100. • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 11.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TFI PPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922 - SO47 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: August 31, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A•7474 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 8 -31 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila Client ID: Rush S -23 ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, 74.5 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND O ICAL SERVICES ff STAN P. PALMQUIST SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 0.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922- 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: A7474 Client ID: S -23 Date: August 31, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg RPD* 17.2 Duplicate(D) 62.7 Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample(S) 74.5 *RPD = relative percent difference [(S D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -1 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Client ID: RUSH S -24 ANALYSIS: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SEP 8 RECD STAN P. PALMQUIST SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY FAST', SUITE B -14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TFr FPHONE (206)922 -2310 - FAX (206)922-SO47 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 1, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: A 7488 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg, 70.0 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND ANA ICAL SERVICES • D -25, Phis repan is Issued coley for toe We o(the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsIbpity only. (or. the due performance of nnaysls In aaotdance with Client /Project Name 5 SG Project Location ANALYSES Work Order No. 8/-2182- Field Logbook No. Sampler: (Signature) BD .</ c Chain of Custody Tape No. Sample No.I Identification Date Time Lab Sample Number Type of sk. Sample 1 S -2-{ 8131/8¢ ((03o S c.1 )c- Relinquished by: (Signatur) :tea C- Date 4 11 /e? Time 0 f°D Receiv d by: ( � ' i g ature) • Date Time Re' quished by: ( Signature) .� di.� , D a 9 f Time o :/g R- - -dby: ( Signatur C _ Dat I Time /64 Relinquished by: (Signature) Date Time Received by: (Signatur f ate Time Comments: ostt ANALYTICAL LABORATORY CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD ev. Oki VIA A® s ‘flialfirrr 160 ENVIRONMENTAL, INC: • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY FAST, SUITE 11-14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 6, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7511 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -5 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Laboratory Hydrocarbons, ppmn Sample No. Client Identification by EPA Method 418.1 Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush. 3 S -25 .S -26 S -27 37.3 89.3 70.3 UD L .TICAL SERVICES D 27 'V This report is issued solely for the use or the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts fesponsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with industry mepinf;le pr ctice.In no.'evcnt shall Sound AnaMical Services. Inc. or Us employeci be responsible for consequential or special damages In any kind or in any amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 70.3 63.7 9.9 - SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14. TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922- 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7511 Date: September 6, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -27 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference ((S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 8 -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424. TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 3047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 6, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7530 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -6 -89 Project: RUSH 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila, WA Client ID: S-28 ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg/kg, 36.9 by EPA Method 418.1 S!UND — ICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIS D -29 Ts, ___ _c- c.:..�.1 .nl.1v fnr Ih. ,o.. of II.. n.renn n. mmn.nv fn whom II (. :Iddr.d. Th{. b■hn.,IAIV AeCeou responsibility onN for the due Performance of analysis Ice accordance with , SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. • SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 11.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310. FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7530 Date: September 6, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -28 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample(S) 36.9 *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 D 30 Duplicate(D) 33.9 RPD* 8.5 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -I4. TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 7, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7556 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -7 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG, Tukwila ANALYSIS: Laboratory Sample No. Client Identification Rush 1 Rush 2 Rush 3. Rush 4. Rush 5 'SAmplec 01 ..vsg S - 29 S - 30 01 02 03 3 are. 0r S 1 .1 fie Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 33.9 45.3 3,703 1,599 56.4 SQ .UND AN'L ICAL SERVICES D 31 This report is Luued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it b addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only (or the due performance of analysts In accordance with . Industry acceptable Practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services. Inc. or its employees be responsible for conuequentlal or speNAl damages In any kind or in any amount, Lab No: 7556 Date: August 7, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: 02 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT • Sample(S) 1,599 DUPLICATES Duplicate(D) 1,382 *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S ^ D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 RPD* 14.6 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE R.14. TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 11, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil • Lab No.: 7589 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -11 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Client ID Rush 1 S -31 Rush 2 S-32 Rush 3 S -33 by .EPA Method 418.1) Total Petroluem Hydrocarbons. mct /kct SOUND A = ICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUI$JP 41.5 79.4 42.3 Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 42.3 41.4 2.2 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE &14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 5047 . QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES 'Lab No: 7589 Client ID: S -33 Date September 11, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD .= relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922• SO47 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 13, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7618 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -12 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila Client ID: RUSH S -34 ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 78.2 by EPA Method 418.1 ND AN _ ` CAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIST D - This re port is Issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In accordance with ornnice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services, Inc. or 1Is employees be responsible for consequential or special dmmages in any kind or in any amount. , SOUND . ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 11•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7618 Date: September 13, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S-34 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample(S) Duplicate(D) 78.2 74.9 RPD* 4.3 *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5041 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 14, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7648 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9- 14-89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -36 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 Lab Sample No. Rush 2 Client ID: S -37 71.6 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 70 by EPA Method 418.1 OUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES toll D - 37 :,':. ..t.i......t ,.nh.fnr the due nerfnrmenee n[ analysis In accordance with Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 70.3 60.9 14.3 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE H -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 5047 Lab No: 7648 Date: September 14, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Client ID: S -37 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 8047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date:. September 15, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7662 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -15 -89 Project: "RUSH" SSG, Tukwila Client ID: S -40 ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Hyrocarbons, mg /kg 33.0 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES STAN P. • PALMQUIST Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 33.0 27.5 18.2 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424. TELEPHONE (206)922.2310. FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Lab No: 7662 Client ID: S -40 Date: September 15, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: .Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = ((S.- D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 DUPLICATES -40 • SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY FAST, SUITE 13.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424. TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922- 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 15, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7658 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -14 -89 Client ID: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -38 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 40.6 by EPA Method 418.1 Client ID: S - . Lab. 'Sample No. Rush 2 Total. Petroleum Hydrocarbons,. mg /kg ,76:0 by EPA . Method 418.1 SOUND STAN P. PALMQUISW CAL SE VICES D ^ 41 This report is issued solely for the use of the person or Company to whom It is addressed This laboraiory accepts responsibility only for the due perfarmance of analysis in accordance with Compound SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 13-14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. Sample(S) 76.0 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT . DUPLICATES Lab No: 7658 Client ID: S -39 Date: September 15, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg Duplicate(D) 67.0 *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 -.42 RPD* 12.6 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING EN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY FAST. SUITE 13.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Report On: Analysis of Soil IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -18 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Tukwila Client ID: S -41 RUSH ANALYSIS: Date: September 18, 1989 Lab No.: . 7672 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 47.2 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND - A,YICAL SERVICES STAN . P. PALMQUIST } :' rcrom is i►wc4 solely f the use of the person or company to whom it 4 addressed. This laboratory ncecpts responsibllity only fur the due performance of analysis'in accordance wiih D 43 [Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 47.2 45.4 3.9 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 Lab No: 7672 Date: September 18, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT • DUPLICATES Client ID: S -41 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference ((S - D) / . ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, • INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE 8•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Report On: Analysis of Soil IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 9 -19 -89 Project: 89- 2482 - SSG, Tukwila Client ID: "RUSH" S -42 ANALYSIS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 Date: September 20, 1989 Lab No.: 7697 78.8 S UND AN YTICAL SERVICES STAN.P. PALMQUIST SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922- 3047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7697 Date: September 20, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -42 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Sample(S) 78.8 Duplicate(D) 74.6 RPD* 5.5 *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922.5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: September 20, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No'.: 7716 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 09 -20 -89 Project: #2482 - SSG Time, DC ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client ID: S -43 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 37.3 by EPA Method 418.1 Lab Sample No. Rush 2 Client ID: S -44 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 38,.0 OUND AN YTICAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUZST D -47 ThIs report is issued s otety for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 38.0 31.6 18.4 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922 - SO47 Lab No: 7716 Date: September 20, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 Client ID: S -44 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, StJTTE B•14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)522- 5047 Report To: Olympus Environmental ' Report On: Analysis of Soil IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 09 -21 -89 Project: SSG Client ID: RUSH S -45 ANALYSTS: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND A fi•w'f STATE P. L � Date: September 22, 1989 Lab No.: 7747 27.8 ALYTICAL )ERVICES PAL IQpIST D - 49 This report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it Is addressed, This laboratory accepts responiibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7747 Date: September 22, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: S -45 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg Sample(S) 27.8 Compound Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Duplicate(D) 27.0 RPD* 2.3 *RPD = relative percent difference = ((S - D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 - 50 ANALYSIS: SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. SO47 Report To: Olympus Environmental Report On: Analysis of Soil • Lab No.: 7767 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 09 -22 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG /Soil Burner, Tukwila, WA Client ID: RUSH S -46 Date: September 25, 1989 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 54.9 by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND ANALyT SERVICES jj :STAN P. PALMQUIST 1 D.- 51 his upon is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed.. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis in accordance with i,lu•Ir ■lektq" s ,., , , ' rarusr. In no even) shall Sound Anatvncal Service', Inc, or its employees be recponsible for consequential Orspeciar J in any kind or in nnv amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 54.9 54.5 0.7 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EASI•, SUITE B -14, TACOMA. WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922 -2310 • FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7767 Client ID: S -46 Date: September 25, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = G (S - D) •/ ((S -h D) / 2 ) ] x 100. ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. RUSH 1 RUSH 2 RUSH 3 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B.14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 - TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922.5047 Report. To: Olympus Environmental Date: October 2, 1989 Report On: Analysis of Soil Lab No.: 7877 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 10 -02 -89 Project: 89 -2482 SSG Total Petroleum Client ID Hydrocarbons, ma/kg SSG - 47 SSG - 48 SSG - 49 (TPH by EPA Method 418.1 SOUND: ANALYTICAL SERVICES 41.9 29.0 32.8 STAN., P. PALMQUI 'T D 53 Phis report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysis In accordance with nduslry acceptable practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services, Inc. or its employees be responsible for consequential or special damages in any kind or in any amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 32.8 30.3 7.9 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B-14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922. 5047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7877 Date: October 2, 1989 Client: Olympus Environmental Client ID: SSG - 49 Matrix: Soil Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference [ (S .- D) / ((S + D) / 2) ] x 100 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B•14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 9&47A • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 • FAX (206)922. SO47 Report To: Olympus Environmental Date: October 4, 1989 Report On: Analysis. of Soil Lab No.: 7916 IDENTIFICATION: Samples Received on 10 -04 -89 Project: SSG ANALYSIS: Lab Sample No. Rush 1 Client. ID: S -51 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 41.9 by EPA Method 418.1 Lab Sample No. Rush 2 Client ID: S -52 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons, mg /kg 36.3 by EPA Method 418.1 D .- 55 SOUND ANALYTCAL SERVICES STAN P. PALMQUIST his report is issued solely for the use of the person or company to whom it is addressed. This laboratory accepts responsibility only for the due performance of analysts in accordance wilt doily acceptable practice. In no event shall Sound Analytical Services, Inc or Its employees be responsible for consequential or special damages In any kind or in any amount. Compound Sample(S) Duplicate(D) RPD* Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons 36„3 35.9 1.1 SOUND ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC. SPECIALIZING IN INDUSTRIAL & TOXIC WASTE ANALYSIS 4630 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST, SUITE B -14, TACOMA, WASHINGTON 96424 • TELEPHONE (206)922.2310 - FAX (206)922 - 3047 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT DUPLICATES Lab No: 7916 Client ID: S -52 Date: October 4, 1989 Matrix: Soil Client: Olympus Environmental Units: mg /kg *RPD = relative percent difference = [(S - D) / ((S + D) / 2)] x 100 July 25, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Senior Project Manager FWG /tpj AnalyticalTeehnologies,InC. 560 Naches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228 -8335 ATI I.D. it 8907 -093 G J ! 26 U / 1989 Routing ,te • ... ... , . ! • ........071 0 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name : - On July 13, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received three soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mar C. Silva Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8907 -093 -1 S -1 SOIL 07/13/89 8907 -093 -2 5-2 SOIL 07/13/89 8907 -093 -3 S -3 SOIL 07/13/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 3 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the . scheduled disposal date. - 58 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI T.D. # 8907 -093 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD BETX GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 MOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD 7 -2.2 6 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE. META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME : CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4, REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8020 (BETX) RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 97 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 N/A N/A 07/14/89 07/14/89 mg /Kg 1 AnalyIicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT #• PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE : GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 S - : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) ON DRY WEIGHT SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 0.034 <0.025 96 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -1 07/13/89 07/13/89 07/14/89 07/14/89 mg /Kg 1 Analyticalrechnologies,Inc, CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD. RESULTS BASED COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS,•INC. : 1199 -07. -4 : S -2 : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) ON DRY WEIGHT SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 93 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -2 : 07/13/89 : 07/13/89 : 07/14/89 : 07/14/89 : mg /Kg : 1 AnalylicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME. CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -07 -4 S -3 : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED . DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <.0.025 <0.025 <0.025 96 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -3 07/13/89 07/13/89 07/14/89 07/14/89 mg /Kg 1 Jl AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc. PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA ATI T.D. # 8907 -093 CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. SAMPLE I.D. : 8907 -093 -3 PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 DATE ANALYZED : 07/14/89 PROJECT NAME : - UNITS : mg /Kg EPA METHOD : 8020 (BETX) MATRIX : SOIL COMPOUND DUP DUP SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED % RESULT ADDED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD BENZENE <0.025 0.400 0.279 70 0.260 65 7 TOLUENE <0.025 0.400 0.395 99 0.366 92 8 META & PARA XYLENE <0.025 1.10 1.07 97 0.99 90 8 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample. Result) Average Result X 100. Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 /l AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS. ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY. GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8015 MODIFIED • FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 07/14/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/14/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 AnolyticalTechnologies,inc, CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS. • FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 S -1 SOIL 8015 MODIFIED ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -1 DATE SAMPLED . DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED : DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 89 C10 - C28 DIESEL 07/13/89 07/13/89 07/14/89 07/17/89 mg /Kg 1 Jt AnalyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. : S -2 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -2 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 60 C8 — C28 DIESEL 07/13/89 07/13/89 07/14/89 07/17/89 mg/ Kg 1 AnalyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT . PROJECT # PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD . COMPOUNDS FUEL. HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 S -3 SOIL 8015 MODIFIED DATE SAMPLED : 07/13/89 DATE RECEIVED : 07/13/89 DATE EXTRACTED : 07/14/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/17/89 UNITS mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 41 C8 - C28 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 -3 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT NAME : - EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED SAMPLE ID : 8907- 091 -13 COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS <5 500 RPD (Relative % Difference) = FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SAMPLE CONC SPIKED RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE REC % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration - b9 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 DATE EXTRACTED : 07/14/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/17/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 433 87 449 90 X 100 Average. Result DUP RECOVERY RPD 4 (Sample Result Duplicate Result) X 100 Il AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 -3 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 16 46 14 MOISTURE % 15 15 13 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL / \ AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC.' PROJECT # :1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE o PARAMETER UNITS T.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8907 -075 -1 45 45 0 108.1 62.7 101 MOISTURE % 8907 -099 -7 2.3 2.5 8 N/A N/A N/A MOISTURE % 8907 -078 -2 17 17 0 N/A N/A N/A % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result — Duplicate Result). X•100 ATI I.D. # 8907 -093 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL • ci CD __ C] X hr+ C) tn CD • CD Sasple: S8907-093 -1 Channel: F1D REAR-A Filenaoe: 9RF00465 Acquired: 17- JUL -89 13:11 Method: C: \MAX \DA1A21RAOBTX4 Operator: CDM Coesents: DIESEL AND HEX PROGRAM FOR DIESEL /BTXE SIDS, MS, MSD, FPB, FPBN x 10 1 v(r if •t 15 ti .4 _. 6.66 .f - 10.01 14.47 1" :y C) C] • • .L•. Q. G? C) C7. C1 - ;: 25.03 DIESEL �• 1••4 0 Ci " . • - _..__ — _.....__.._._.»_.._...__. ... OP ._..� ....w.ww. —.. », 46.22 DN 72 • C) _. C) —. C7 X ... CD Saepte, S8907 -093-2 Channel, FID REAR -A Flienaee, 9RF00466 Acquired, 17- JUL -89 14i11 Method, Cr \MAX \DAIA2 \RADBIX4 Operator, COM Couente, DIESEL AND BTU PROGRAM FOR DIESEL /SHXE SIDS, MS, MSD, FPB, FPBN >c 10 wctli E CD CCD CD E C) C) J 1 .` �.__._.I �... L: 1 ! ,,. ------ 23.16 DIESEL I ' I� I 7 I� II . - • I DNOP Sample! SO907-093-3 Channel! FID REAR -A Acquired! 17- JUL -89 15111 Method! C :\MAX \DATA2 \RADBTX4 Comments! DIESEL AND BTEX PROGRAM FOR DIESEL /RIXE SIDS, MS, MOD, FPB, FPBN W • (#1 x 10-2 '.'o 1-t• Filenames 9RF00467 Operator! CDM Q 2 0 Q J • M..:.•- 25 62 DIESEL • ,} l It I • ii 1 ' E, 45.45 :......_......._.._..,.__._..__ W..,.�,......_ ..__... _....__ .._..__._.__._.w.__:_._..-_.__. _..___..._ _ _.__.:, 45.99 DNOP • J AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. 560 Neches Avenue S f V V V enton, • DATE: IA LAB ID ANALYSIS REQUEST LABORATORY NUMBER: J z O u, N co N J 0 N m C U -e m U) 8 rn co 2 uite Chain of Custod DATE 7 / 3 / , PAGE / OF! PROJECT NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: • ;.PROJECT: INFORMATION PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: 414 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: LLz1=Q_LLY E RECEIPT. :. TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD 3 TAT: ❑ 24HR ❑ 48 HRS ❑ 72 HRS tit1 WK I ❑ 2 WKS (Normal) PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR RUSH DATA EUNQUISHED BY: [Tr Signature: 077 .RECEIVED BY: Printed Name: Company: Time: Date: RELINQUISHED BY: Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: RECEIVED.BY: • Signature: Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: RELINQUISHED BY: Signature: Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: RECEIVED BY: (LAB) Si re: li e me* Pr' t D - 1 ed v;r e. Gtr at (' , O Analy 'cal Technologies, I ATI Labs: San Diego (619)458 -9141 • Phoenix (602)438 -1530 • Seattle (206)228 -8335 • Pensacola (904)474 -1001 DISTRIBUTION: White, Canary - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.• Pink - ORIGINATOR A AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. 560 Naches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228-8335 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 August 1, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name On July 17, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received three soil samples for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as . specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mar fC. .Silva Se r Project Manager FWG /tpj Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical. Manager ± AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - Am pit S -H MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 3 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8907 -106 -1 S -4 IN SOIL 07/17/89 8907 -106 -2 S -5 OUT SOIL 07/17/89 8907 -106 -3 S -6 STOCKPILE SOIL 07/17/89 TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE The samples from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD BETX GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 MOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD 7 -2.2 AnolyiicolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # . PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8020 (BETX) RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE. SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 07/17/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/20/89 UNITS mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <0.025 <0.025. <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 99. ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -07 -4 S -4 IN : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES BROMOFLUOROBENZENE DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 0.044 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 110 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 -1 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : mg /Kg : 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE S -5 OUT SOIL 8020 (BETX) ON DRY WEIGHT PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 99 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 -2 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/19/89 : mg /Kg 1 AnalyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE S -6 STOCKPILE SOIL 8020 (BETX) ON DRY WEIGHT SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC.. 1199 -07 -4 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 0.031 <0.025 <0.025 98 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 -3 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/19/89 : mg/ Kg : 1 J AnalylicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - EPA METHOD : 8020 (BETX) COMPOUND SAMPLE RESULT BENZENE <0.025 TOLUENE <0.025 META & PARA XYLENE <0.025 PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SPIKE, SPIKED % ADDED SAMPLE REC 0.400 0.400 1.10 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) 80 0.279 0.395 1.07 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 SAMPLE I.D. : 8907 -093 -3 DATE ANALYZED : 07/14/89 UNITS : mg /Kg MATRIX : SOIL 70 99 97 Average Result DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 0.260 0.366 0.99 X 1 00 DUP REC RPD 65 92 90 7 8 8 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 J \ AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT PROJECT # : PROJECT NAME . CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY 81 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED. UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 : N/A : N/A : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : mg/ Kg : 1 J \\ AnoiyticalTechnologies,tnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - CLIENT I.D. : S -4 IN SAMPLE MATRIX :SOIL EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS. HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS. DATA SUMMARY ATI I.D. # 8907 - 106 -1 DATE SAMPLED 07/17/89 DATE RECEIVED 07/17/89 DATE EXTRACTED 07/17/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/18/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 410 C10 - C28 -.DIESEL. AnolyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD . COMPOUNDS GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 S -5 OUT SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 17 C10 — C28 DIESEL ATI I.D. DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : 8907 -106 -2 07/17/89. 07/17/89 07/17/89 07/17/89. mg /Kg 1 /�4J\ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME. : - CLIENT I.D. : S -6 STOCKPILE SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD :8015 MODIFIED COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 48 C10 - C28 DIESEL ATI I.D. #8907 -106 -3 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/17/89 : 07/18/89 : mg/ Kg . 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. COMPOUND FUEL HYDROCARBONS <5 FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : APPLIED GEOTECHNOLOGY INC. CLIENT I.D. . PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 DATE ANALYZED : PROJECT NAME : - SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED UNITS SAMPLE CONC SPIKED % RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE REC 500 433 D - 85 DUP SPIKED SAMPLE 87 449 90 %Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Average Result ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 X 1 0 0 8907 - 091 -13 07/17/89 SOIL mg/ Kg DUP RECOVERY RPD Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result — Duplicate Result) 4 X 100 A.AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS PARAMETER UNITS -1 -2 -3 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 400 16 13 MOISTURE 15 13 13 ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL / J\ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI ATI I.D. # 8907 -106 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8907 -105 -1 <1.0 <1.0 0 N/A N/A N/A PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg BLK SPIKE N/A N/A N/A 62.9 63.6 99 MOISTURE o 8907 -164 -1 13 12 8 N/A N/A N/A % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 Average Result X 3 � W °~ _ C� 0 _ CD • . . . . CU CD CIN CD 01 CD CD CD CD CD , ^_'1-._—__ -.—_-___J--___�—__—_L_-----,— L � l � ! Samples S8907'106'1 Channel: HU FRONT-A Acquired: 18'JUL'09 5:18 Method: C6HAX1OAYAWAO81X4 Comments: DIESEL AND PEI PROGRAM FOR DIESEL/B1XE SIDS, MS, MSD, FPB, FPBN 0 on "u ---------' �-------- - 19.87 DIESEL MI••••11101 YIN ----------'-- '---' I _I � Filenames 9[F00481 Operator: CUU C) C:1 Sample: SB907-106.2 Channelt FID FRONT-A Filenames 9FF00475 Acquiredt 17-JUL-89 23;16 Methods COAX1DATAIMOBTX4 Operators COM Commenist DIESEL AND DTEX PROGRAM FOR DIESEL/DM SIDS, HS, PISO, FPB, FPIIN (, 44 (4 <0.1 0 0 0 r I ...,......:=T.r.,..-:=6.744.---=!mr...7.: '.... - 3 -1 --1 -1-- .:. 1 lir ----- Wmpho " )c 1 () . 4...Pc) 1 25.70 DIESEL 40,27 DNDP • X t CD -v .^4 I. - 23.98 DIESEL • | /| | | Sooy\ev SU907'106'3 Channels [Y8 FR01l'0 Acquired: 0'JUL'89 0:16 Method: COU0X\8AlA>\FAD81X4 Comments: DIESEL AND 8l0 PROGRAM FOR UIESEL/8YX[ Sl8S, NS, HS0, FPB, FP8N 10.31 4 • 12.92 '�— 0 1. ~ M �o . . . . . . 01 0 01 o cn al 0 0 o o __i___-'__--_ L-__,____L___._ Menage: 9[F00476 Operator: C0H el Analytical Technologies,Inc. 560 Naches Avenue SW, Suite 101 Renton,WA 98055 Chain of Custody • AT1tabs: San Diego (619)458-9141 • Phoenix (602)438-1530 • Seattle (206)228-8335 • Pensacola (904)474-1001 DATE 9 PAGEL 0E4_ 11111O111111•111111111111211113111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 PROJECT NUMBER: //19 -0? —V PROJECT NAME: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: VIA: ..••• • - PROjECTINFOIIIAATK)N TAT: 0 24HR 0 48 HRS TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD COND./COLD 0 72 HRS 1 vark 0 2 WKS (No mat • PR IOR:AUTHOR IZATION - ISREQUIR E FOR:RUSH DATA SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: I Weh.1 (/-cil RELINQUISHED BY:. 1. P 'nted 7 /1a 7 t7 c6 Corn any: i 7 • Printed Name: Company: Date: RECEIVED BY: 1 Signature: Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: Signature: Time: RECEIVED BY: 2. .. . . . ..................... . Signature: Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: RELINQUISHEO BY: I • Signature: ' Time: Printed Name: Date: Company: RECEIVED BY: (LAB) 3. Signfture: Tune: ( 6 3 , p fi t o I Printed • i Date: -- 1 )c (colt t or t j n inatytfcal . Technologies, lnd. DISTRIBUTION: White, Canary - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.• Pink - ORIGINATOR Cr% Analytical Technologies,Inc. 560 Naches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228 -8335 August 1, 1989 Geoengineers, Inc. 2405 140th Avenue N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : -07 -4 Project Name : Bedford Tukwila On July 19, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received one soil sample for analysis. The sample was analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mart/ C. 'Silva Senior Project Manager FWG /tpj ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 � rieers AUG - 2 11383 ,te,(Lefaozzarir Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager �. 0 F-1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME BEDFORD TUKWILA ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED 8907 -133 -1 S -7 SOIL 07/19/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 1 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 The sample from this project will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the date of this report. If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. - 93 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD BETX GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 MOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD 7-2.2 ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 il ,Anolyticallechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT #, PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX : EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO.XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 - 07 - 4 BEDFORD TUKWILA REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8020 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES: DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED . UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 ATI I.D. 8907 -133 N/A N/A 07/20/89 07/24/89 mg /Kg 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED COMPOUNDS BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE BROMOFLUOROBENZENE GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 BEDFORD TUKWILA S -7 SOIL 8020 (BETX) ON DRY WEIGHT PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERIES DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED : UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 91 ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 -1 07/19/89 07/19/89 07/20/89 07/21/89 mg /Kg 1 AnalyticalTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA EPA METHOD : 8020 (BETX) COMPOUND SAMPLE RESULT BENZENE <0.025 TOLUENE <0.025 META & PARA XYLENE <0.025 PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA SPIKE SPIKED % ADDED SAMPLE REC 0.400 0.400 1.10 0.385 0.423 1.13 96 106 103 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 SAMPLE I.D. : DATE ANALYZED : UNITS MATRIX DUP SPIKED SAMPLE N/A N/A N/A X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) Average Result • BLANK 7/20 07/20/89 mg/ Kg SOIL DUP REC RPD N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A X 100 AnalyiicalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT. I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD • COMPOUNDS GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 BEDFORD TUKWILA REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED 07/20/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/23/89 UNITS mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULTS <5 GASOLINE <5. DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 Il AnolocalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUNDS FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 BEDFORD TUKWILA S -7 SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED . DATE EXTRACTED . DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR : RESULTS <5 GASOLINE 87 C10 - C28 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 -1 07/19/89 07/19/89 07/20/89 07/23/89 mg /Kg 1 L AnalylicalTechnologies,Inc. FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : APPLIED GEOTECHNOLOGY INC PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED DUP SAMPLE CONC SPIKED % COMPOUND RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE REC FUEL HYDROCARBONS <5* 500 448 90 431 * For quality control data calculation purposes only. (The type of fuel hydrocarbons present in the sample are different from the type of fuel hydrocarbons spiked.) % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) D 100 . CLIENT I.D. : 8907 -133 -1 DATE ANALYZED : 07/23/89 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL UNITS : mg /Kg Average Result ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 DU P SPIKED % SAMPLE RECOVERY RPD X 100 86 4 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # 1199 -07 -4. PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA PARAMETER UNITS -1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 24 MOISTURE % 11 GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL J \ AnalyticolTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # :.1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : BEDFORD TUKWILA PARAMETER PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS MOISTURE MOISTURE ATI UNITS I.D. GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL mg /Kg 8907 -105 -1 <1.0 <1.0 0 N/A N/A N/A mg /Kg BLK SPIKE N/A N/A 8907 -128 -2 16 16 8907 - 138 -11 13 13 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample. Result) D - 102 Average Result ATI I.D. # 8907 -133 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC N/A 62.9 0 N/A 0 N/A X 100 Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) = ( Sample Result - Duplicate Result) 63.6 N/A N/A X 100 99 N/A N/A a 11.24' a -• 12.83 fr"' . t . ." I �• • 21.89 DIESEL Sasple: SB907 -133-1 Channel: FID FRONT -A Acquired: 23-JUL -89 11:56 Method: C: \MAX \DATAI \FAOBTX5 Couents: DIESEL AND BTU PROGRAM FOR DIESEL/BTU SIDS, MS, MSD, FPO, FPBN >< 1 CV 1 %Jo 11. t CA ,.y ,.4 ha ha as C) C CD CD _L L . L 1. L__.. L L r-- ..........�,�....... 40,23 DNOP Filenaie: 9FF00600 Operator: CDM LAnalyticalTechnologies,inc. 560 Naches Avenue SW, Suite 101 Renton,WA 98055 PROJECT MANAGER: -/ 06 vi COMPANY: (_7 ADDRESS: 24n f1 , f , f) c_ iv 1?.r2j 1 6,71 A PHONE: 7 / & C SAMPLED BY: " � �^�! s .SAMPLE DISPOSAL. INSTRUCTIONS t . t ATI Disposal @ $5.00 each ❑ Return SAMPLE ID m U) U O DATE ;:; ; _ l`1 ❑ Pickup (will call) LABORATORY NUMBER ANALYSIS REQUEST J 0 w r� V N m 1 a- J a- 2 i J 0 m CD b; m V rn 0 o� 0 f- a 2 a° a- U I-- f Ea INFORMATION PROJECT NAME: ` , :5'l•'�L� PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: VIA: REC TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS CHAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS Y/N/NA INTACT? Y/N/NA RECEIVED GOOD CONDJCOLD P. TAT: ❑ 24HR ❑ 48 HRS ❑ 72 HRS 123 1 WK ❑ 2 WKS (Normal) PRIOR AUTHORIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR RUSH DATA SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: (Ar` Chain of Custody ECINOUISHED :B. Si. . ture• A Time Signature: Signature: Printed Name: Company: RECE :RECEIVED BY: 2 RECEIVED BY (LAB) e: / Signature: r Tin - L . Time: RELINQUISHED B ' Date: Printed Name: Company: DATE.? /4 ` PAGE OF Time: Time: Date: • REGNQUISHED. Signature: Printed Name: Time: ted Name: Daje: . JAepir /•aAYPq ) /� Analytical Technologies, Id. All Labs: San Diego (619)458 -9141 • Phoenix (602)438 -1530 • Seattle (206)228 -8335 • Pensacola (904)474 -1001 DISTRIBUTION: White. Canary - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.• Pink - ORIGINATOR FWG /hbb August 3, 1989 • . ,a AnalytiCalre�CI1�1�1l®gOeS,InC. 560 Noches Avenue, S.W., Suite 101, Renton, WA 98055, (206) 228-8335 ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 • GeoEngineers, Inc. 2405 140th Ave. N.E. Suite 105 Bellevue, WA 98005 Attention : John Biggane Project Number : 1199 -07 -4 Project Name : - On July 21, 1989 Analytical Technologies, Inc. received one soil sample for analyses. The samples were analyzed with EPA methodology or equivalent methods as specified in the attached . analytical schedule. The results, sample cross reference, and the quality control data are enclosed. Mar C. Silva Sen or Project Manager AUG - 7. 1JJ9 Li Frederick W. Grothkopp Technical Manager • / \ Anal yticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ATI # CLIENT DESCRIPTION MATRIX DATE SAMPLED. 8907 -164 -1 S -8 SOIL 07/21/89 MATRIX # SAMPLES SOIL 1 SAMPLE CROSS REFERENCE SHEET TOTALS ATI STANDARD DISPOSAL PRACTICE ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 The samples from this project.will be disposed of in thirty (30) days from the, date of this report If an extended storage period is required, please contact our sample control department before the scheduled disposal date. D - 106 AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL SCHEDULE TECHNIQUE REFERENCE /METHOD BETX GC /PID EPA 8020 FUEL HYDROCARBONS GC /FID EPA 8015 MODIFIED PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS IR EPA 418.1 MOISTURE GRAVIMETRIC METHOD 7-2.2 - 107 ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 1t \ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT T.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUND BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY : GEOENGINEERS, INC. : 1199 -07 -4 : REAGENT BLANK : SOIL : 8020 (BETX) DATE SAMPLED : N/A DATE RECEIVED : N/A DATE EXTRACTED : 07/24/89 DATE ANALYZED : 07/26/89 UNITS : mg /Kg DILUTION FACTOR : 1 RESULT <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 92 ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 AnalyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD RESULTS BASED ON DRY WEIGHT COMPOUND BENZENE ETHYLBENZENE TOLUENE META & PARA XYLENE ORTHO XYLENE : GEOENGINEERS, INC., : 1199 -07 -4 S -8 SOIL : 8020 (BETX) SURROGATE PERCENT RECOVERY BROMOFLUOROBENZENE PURGEABLE AROMATICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULT <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 <0.025 70 ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 -1 : 07/21/89 : 07/21/89 : 07/24/89 : 07/25/89 : mg/ Kg : 1 COMPOUND /J\ AnolylicalTechnoiogies,Inc. PURGEABLE AROMATICS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. SAMPLE I.D. 8907- 138 -11 PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 DATE ANALYZED : 07/25/89 PROJECT NAME : UNITS : mg /Kg EPA METHOD 8020 (BETX) MATRIX : SOIL. DUP DUP SAMPLE SPIKE SPIKED % SPIKED % RESULT ADDED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE REC RPD BENZENE <0.025 0.400 0.333 83 0.309 77 7 TOLUENE <0.025 0.400 0.339 85 0.323 81 5 META & PARA XYLENE <0.025 1.10 0.904 82 0.827 75 9 % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample. Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) - . 110 Average Result ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 X 1 X 100 /l\ AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc, CLIENT PROJECT # PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD COMPOUND: FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 REAGENT BLANK SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING DATE. SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR RESULT <5 GASOLINE <5 DIESEL ATI I.D. #'8907 -164 N/A N/A 07/24/89 07/25/89 mg/ Kg 1 /l AnolyficalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT . PROJECT # . PROJECT NAME CLIENT I.D. . SAMPLE MATRIX EPA METHOD . COMPOUND S -8 SOIL 8015 MODIFIED FUEL HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS. HYDROCARBON RANGE HYDROCARBONS QUANTITATED USING FUEL HYDROCARBONS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY GEOENGINEERS, INC. 1199 -07 -4 RESULT <5 GASOLINE 120 C10 - C28 DIESEL ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 -1 DATE SAMPLED DATE RECEIVED DATE EXTRACTED DATE ANALYZED UNITS DILUTION FACTOR 07/21/89 07/21/89 07/24/89 07/26/89 mg /Kg 1 l AnalyticalTechnologies,Inc. FUEL HYDROCARBONS FUEL HYDROCARBONS QUALITY CONTROL DATA CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. CLIENT I.D. : 8907 -164 -1 PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 DATE ANALYZED : 07/26/89 PROJECT NAME : - SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL EPA METHOD : 8015 MODIFIED UNITS mg /Kg DUP DUP SAMPLE CONC SPIKED % SPIKED COMPOUND RESULT SPIKED SAMPLE REC SAMPLE RECOVERY RPD 500 428 86 449 90 5 Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) Spike Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) (Sample Result -'Duplicate. Result) ATI I.D. # 8907-164 X 100 X 100 / ,J\ AnulyticalTechnologies,lnc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : - PARAMETER MOISTURE GENERAL CHEMISTRY RESULTS UNITS -1 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 20 13 ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL \\ AnolyticalTechnologies,Inc. CLIENT : GEOENGINEERS, INC. PROJECT # : 1199 -07 -4 PROJECT NAME : -- GENERAL CHEMISTRY QUALITY CONTROL ATI PARAMETER UNITS I.D. RESULT RESULT RPD CONC ADDED REC PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS mg /Kg 8907 -163 -7 95 68 33 160 63.0 103 MOISTURE % 8907 -164 -1 13 12 8 N/A N/A N/A % Recovery = (Spike Sample Result - Sample Result) SAMPLE DUP SPIKED SPIKE % SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL X 100 Spike. Concentration RPD (Relative % Difference) _ (Sample Result - Duplicate Result) X 100.. ATI I.D. # 8907 -164 CD CD Saaplet S0907-164-1 Channel FID FROMI-A Acquired' 26-3111-89 803 Methods C:\MAX\DATAI\EADEMb Coasentst DIESEL AND BTE1 PROGRAM FOR DIESEL/BTIE STDS, MS, MSD, FPB, FPBN • 4 - , .. 11.22 • CD 1•. < Ill: I N. ht 1 •I !Ei C' cri 0 . .. — 116 Filename' 9FF00656 Operators CDM CD CD 4 40.19 ,DNOP AnalyticalTechnologies,inc. 5550 Morehouse Drive • San Diego. CA 92121-1709 Chain of Custody () / DATE 7 1A - /7 r /(- / PAGE / OF / PROJECT MANAGER: I, A . COMPANY: C-..e (. c), ‘o COMPANY: ADDRESS: SAiv1PLERS: (Signature) ( 2 ck-') 7y' 5- PHONE NUMBER SAMPLE ID DATE FIN IMO TIME MATRIX 51.1 k LAB ID Recommended Quantity and Preservative (Provide trip e volume on QC SemPies) 0 11:9-6 1 ! 111: 111 011 . 2 x .7- " :1 11 :::. . ris -0 -- m co z 01 o" o 6 § >c w ▪ 1, E11111111111151111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111111111111 MII11111111111111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII•IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIllIl 11111111111111111111 IMI111111111111111111111111111111111111. 11111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111•11111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII•IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111••111111151111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_IIIIIIIII.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIII 3 -0 0 0 ECT:UfQRMAfl PROJECT NUMBER: / 07 - PROJECT NAME: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: vt TAT: D24HR 048 HAS 1;11 WK 02 WKS Comments: iS) (AI 0 /0 ATI Disposal @ $5.00 each 0 Return 0 Pickup (yell call) LE ... . .. „:„, TOTAL NUMBER OF CONTAINERS - Cl-fAIN OF CUSTODY SEALS::::Y/N/NA." INTACT? Y/N'NA • RECEIVED LAB NUMBER i,;c1L1-__ I 4 w :RELJNOU1SHED. gnaure 7L b•1 Printed Name:. Qate: Company: 62( RECEIVEDBY:: .1. SAMPLE DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS Signature: Printed Name: Company: lime: Date: Company: KlUISHED Signature: Time: 3.. Signature: Time: Printed Name: Company: Date: RECEIVED BY: ... . . Signature: Time: Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Company: RECEIVED BY: Signature: Time: Priged Name:—/ Date: re I 7hfrJ' , • Analytical Technologies, Inc. ATT1 LABORATORIES: San Diego (619) 458-9141 • phoenix (602) 438-1530 • Seattle (206) 228-8335 otsmieumoN: mu). canary - ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES. INC. • Pink - ORIGINATOR (— ' 7 'X" REQUIRED INSPECTIONS PHONE DATE APPROVED INSPECT. INITIALS DATE(S) CORRECTION NOTICE ISSUED 1 Footings 431 -3670 2 Foundation 431 -3670 3 Slab and/or Slab Insulation 431 -3670 4 Shear Wall Nailing 431-3670 5 Roof Sheathing Nailing 431 -3670 6 Masonry Chimney 431 -3670 7 Framing 431 -3670 8 Insulation 431 -3670 9 Suspended Ceiling 431 -3670 10 Wall Board Fastening 431 -3670 11 12 13 14 FIRE FINAL insp: 575 -4407 15 PLANNING FINAL 431 -3670 16 PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 431 -3670 X 17 BUILDING FINAL 431.3670 (INSPECTOR COMMENT SECTION ON REVERSE) CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 SITE ADDRESS: BUILDHVG PERMIT INSPECTIt)N RECORD (Post with Building Permit in conspicuous place) BUILDING LP r� �� PERMIT NO. �J DATE ISSUED: PROJECT: 12855 48 Av S CALL FOR INSPECTIONS AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE Time D.C. INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS All approved plans and permits shall be maintained available on the site in the same location. 1. FOOTING - When survey stakes and forms are set and rebar is tied In place. 2. FOUNDATION - When forms and rebar are in place. 3. SLAB .- If structural slab or if undersiab insulation is required. 4. SHEARWALL NAILING - Prior to cover. 5. ROOF SHEATHING NAILING - Prior to cover. 6. MASONRY CHIMNEY - Approximately midpoint. 7. FRAMING - After rough -in inspections such as mechanical, plumbing, gas piping, electrical and fire stopping is in place. 8. INSULATION - After framing approval, but before installation of wallboard. Baffles must be Installed to keep attic ventilation points dear. 9. SUSPENDED CEILING - Fasten diffusers, lights and seismic bracing. 10. WALL BOARD FASTENING - Prior to taping (see UBC Chap. 47 and Table 47G). 11. 12. 13. 14. FINAL FIRE INSPECTION - Contact Fire Department for their requirements. 15. FINAL PLANNING INSPECTION - Contact Planning Department for their requirements. 16. FINAL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION - Contact Public Works Department for their requirements. 17. FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION - When all work, corrections, reports and other inspections are complete. OTHER AGENCIES: Plumbing (including gas piping) -- King County Health Department — 296 -4732 Electrical — Washington State Department of Labor and Industries — 277 -7272 A preconstruction meeting with the Building Inspector may be scheduled prior to starting the job by contacting the Department of Community Development; Building Division at 431 -3670. Although not required, a meeting of this typel ' an often eliminate problems, delays and misunderstandings as the project progresses. C14 PROJECT: al in_Q_ . III PERMIT NO. DATE CALLED: (25Q..,...---- SITE ADDRESS: & . 4 Is• TYPE OF INSPECTI9r CK\ DATE WANTED: a.m. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: REQUESTER: PHONE...140.: te2Q121±21± Q LA 1-i 1 03' INSPECTION RESULTS/COMMENTS: - A - 2. _ A ,--- INSPECTOR: 4 -- DATE: m - CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431-3670 k INSPECTION RECORD 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 98188 CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE Director Mr. Bob Hart Bedford Properties 12720 Gateway Drive Suite 107 Seattle, Washington 98168 Dear Mr. Hart: JH /jh STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 4350-150th Ave. N.E. • Redmond, Washington 98052-5301 • (2(Xi) 867 -7(XX) February 14, 1991 Sincerely, A. RE: Underground tank removal and site remediation at Former Time /DC Truck Terminal, Tukwila, WA. Thank you for sending me the closure and cleanup reports for the above referenced property by Geo Engineers, dated March 5, 1990. Based on the information provided to me the proper procedures were followed regarding the underground tank closure, as required in the Federal Register 40 CFR Part 280. Also based on the reports provided, the site was remediated in accordance with Chapter 70.105D of the Revised Code of Washington and Washington Administrative Code 173 -340, and the Department of Ecology recommended cleanup standards were met or bettered after the remediation process. Please call me at (206)867 -7202 if you have any questions. oseph M. Hickey Toxics Cleanup Program Site Inspector RECEIVED CITY (1F TI iK WIt.A FEB 2 b 19SI PERMIT CENTER RECEIVED FEB 1 9 1991 DEDFORD PROPERTIES CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTIICENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 Plan Check #89 -094: Time D.C. 12855 48 Av S PHONE It (206) 433.1800 PLANS UNDER TUKWILA COMMENTS BUILD NG PERMIT NUMBER rio3 THE APPROVED 1. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Architect and the Tukwila Building Division. 2. All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the job site prior to the start of any construction. 3. All construction to be done in conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code (1988 Edition), Washington State Energy Code (1990 Edition), and Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facility (1990 Edition). 4. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, specifications and computations shall not be construed to be . a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority or violate or cancel the provisions of this code shall be valid. Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor t PLAN REVIEW COPAMEN4 PLAN CHECK # Qj� -(fI`I' PROJECT_ 1'Y10 JD �. REQUIRE@! INSPECTIONS Electrical permit shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and industries and all electrical work will be Inspected by that agency (277- 7272). All mechanical work shall be under separate permit through the City of Tukwila. All structural concrete to be special inspected (See. 308, UBC). 0 All structural welding to be done by W.AB.O. certified welder and special inspected (See. 308, UBC). All high-strength bolting to be special Inspected (Sec. 308, UBC). 7b. 18. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Architect and the Tukwila Building Division. Plumbing permit shall be obtained through the ling County Health Department and plumbing will be Inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296• 4722). All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the Job site prior to the start of any construction. When special Inspection is required either the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division In a timely manner. Reports shall contain address, project name and permit number of the project being inspected. Any new ceiling grid and light fbdurs installation Is required to meet lateral bracing requirements for Seismic Zone 3. Partition walls attached to ceiling grid must be laterally braced If over eight (8) feet in length. Readily accessible access to roof mounted equipment is required. Engineereed trues drawings and calculations shall be on she and available to the building Inspector for inspection purposes. Documents shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Professional Engineer. 14. Any exposed Insulations backing material to have Flame Spread !rie1Ing of 25 or leas, and material shall bear Identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Subgrade preparation including drainage, excavation, compaction, and fill requirements shall conform strictly with recommendelions given In the soils report prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). 18. A statement from the roofing contractor verifying fire retardancy of roof will be required prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). All construction to be done In conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code (1988 Edition), Washington State Energy Code (1990 Edition), and Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facility (1990 Edition). 0 All food preparation establishments must have King County Health Department eign-off prior to opening or doing any food processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be made by calling King County Health Department, 298 -4787, at least three working days prior to desire inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, It is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the Job elte. Fire retardant treated wood shall have a flame spread of not over 25. All materials shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Such identification shall be Issued by an approved agency having a service for inspection at the factory. Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 21. All spray applied fireproofing as required by U.B.C. Standard No. 43-9, shall be special inspected. 0 All wood to remain In placed concrete shall be treated wood. -/ All structural masonry shall be special inspected per U.B.C. Section 308 (a) 7. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, sAecifications and computations shell not be construed to be a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority or violate or cancel the provisions of this code shali be valid. i Footings 2 Foundation 3 Slab /Slab Insulation 4 Shear Wall Nailing 5 Roo! Sheathing Nailing 6 Masonry Chimney 7 Framing 9 Insulation 9 Suspended Ceiling 10 Wall Board Fastening 11 13' 13 14 FIRM FINAL 15 PLANNING FINAL 16 PUBLIC WORKS FINAL 1 BUILDING FINAL t PLAN REVIEW COPAMEN4 PLAN CHECK # Qj� -(fI`I' PROJECT_ 1'Y10 JD �. REQUIRE@! INSPECTIONS Electrical permit shall be obtained through the Washington State Division of Labor and industries and all electrical work will be Inspected by that agency (277- 7272). All mechanical work shall be under separate permit through the City of Tukwila. All structural concrete to be special inspected (See. 308, UBC). 0 All structural welding to be done by W.AB.O. certified welder and special inspected (See. 308, UBC). All high-strength bolting to be special Inspected (Sec. 308, UBC). 7b. 18. No changes will be made to the plans unless approved by the Architect and the Tukwila Building Division. Plumbing permit shall be obtained through the ling County Health Department and plumbing will be Inspected by that agency, including all gas piping (296• 4722). All permits, inspection records, and approved plans shall be posted at the Job site prior to the start of any construction. When special Inspection is required either the owner, architect or engineer shall notify the Tukwila Building Division of appointment of the inspection agencies prior to the first building inspection. Copies of all special inspection reports shall be submitted to the Building Division In a timely manner. Reports shall contain address, project name and permit number of the project being inspected. Any new ceiling grid and light fbdurs installation Is required to meet lateral bracing requirements for Seismic Zone 3. Partition walls attached to ceiling grid must be laterally braced If over eight (8) feet in length. Readily accessible access to roof mounted equipment is required. Engineereed trues drawings and calculations shall be on she and available to the building Inspector for inspection purposes. Documents shall bear the seal and signature of a Washington State Professional Engineer. 14. Any exposed Insulations backing material to have Flame Spread !rie1Ing of 25 or leas, and material shall bear Identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Subgrade preparation including drainage, excavation, compaction, and fill requirements shall conform strictly with recommendelions given In the soils report prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). 18. A statement from the roofing contractor verifying fire retardancy of roof will be required prior to final inspection (see attached procedure). All construction to be done In conformance with approved plans and requirements of the Uniform Building Code (1988 Edition), Uniform Mechanical Code (1988 Edition), Washington State Energy Code (1990 Edition), and Washington State Regulations for Barrier Free Facility (1990 Edition). 0 All food preparation establishments must have King County Health Department eign-off prior to opening or doing any food processing. Arrangements for final Health Department inspection should be made by calling King County Health Department, 298 -4787, at least three working days prior to desire inspection date. On work requiring Health Department approval, It is the contractor's responsibility to have a set of plans approved by that agency on the Job elte. Fire retardant treated wood shall have a flame spread of not over 25. All materials shall bear identification showing the fire performance rating thereof. Such identification shall be Issued by an approved agency having a service for inspection at the factory. Notify the City of Tukwila Building Division prior to placing any concrete. This procedure is in addition to any requirements for special inspection. 21. All spray applied fireproofing as required by U.B.C. Standard No. 43-9, shall be special inspected. 0 All wood to remain In placed concrete shall be treated wood. -/ All structural masonry shall be special inspected per U.B.C. Section 308 (a) 7. Validity of Permit. The issuance of a permit or approval of plans, sAecifications and computations shell not be construed to be a permit for , or an approval of, any violation of any of the provisions of this code or of any other ordinance of the jurisdiction. No permit presuming to give authority or violate or cancel the provisions of this code shali be valid. CITY OF TUKWILA Dept. of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 PROJECT: T tu --DC / autiei e t.41 ADDRESS: i.z5555' CONTACT DATE Z -Z2 - 1 PERMIT CENSER ACTIVITY LOG COMMENTS I !! .L / rlL. / 1IAM• _iL • 1 tt.Q 4-6/A4 J ` —Arid . 1 L .. .. .ill .a.i. A . '1 kinCrt. 4 u /Uix W, / PidlthgtO PLAN CHECK NUMBER 89-0 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila Washington 38188 4! ..Z I R_ . 1..� .. . I Ilk , . • a Iffir Atau INITIALS OFFICE 12535 t ?•: AVE. N.E. SEATTLE l•:A 913125 1206. 36' ?393 i J CORPORATION January 28, 1991 (•,AILING ADDRESS P 0 P ' 3978 SEA ,WWA 98133 22301 ;_0••249!8 I Mr. Bob Hart Bedford Properties 12720 Gateway Drive, Suite 107 Seattle, WA 98168 Re: SSG Job #89 -02 Bedford - Time D.C. Dear Mr. Hart: SMG:dp cc: Mr. Joe Layman Mr. James W. Abbott Job File Com File 0128 -1 This letter may be used as confirmation that the work authorized under the time and materials agreement has been completed. The scope of this work included partial demolition of a shop building and a clean -up project of partially contaminated soils and clean -up on site of same to a point directed by the owner. If you need further information, I shall be happy to supply it. RECEIVE JAN291991 I3E ORD FRWFERTIES 08 May 1989 Mr. Duane Griffin City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Subject: Demolition of Time -DC Maintenance Building Dear Duane: The Time -DC Maintenance Building is located on a 15.5 acre site which we plan to develop in the near future. The single remaining tenant currently occupying the Maintenance Building is scheduled to move in September of 1989, after which complete demolition of the building will take place. We are requesting a permit for demolition of an additional 4,000 square feet of the building, leaving only the currently occupied portion, in order to continue excavation of contaminated soil. The soil contamination originated from leaking storage tanks which were recently removed. A temporary wall will be built at the edge of the demolition to achieve security for the existing space. We will provide, under separate cover, an evaluation from our structural engineer relative to the engineering considerations for the wall. We appreciate the City of Tukwila's cooperation in our efforts to clean up the contamination discovered when the underground storage tanks were removed. If you need additional information or have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, A4 Joseph S. Layman Vice President Northwest BODFORD PROPER"' ES 'RECEIVED CITY OF IU llirl(9 1989 BUILDING Dom. cc: David Kehle Architect Don Cunningham, SSG Bedford Properties, Inc. • Mailing Address • A Diversified Real Estate' 12870 interurban Ave. So. Development and • Seattle, Washington .Management Company 98168 • Telephone (206) 241.1103 FAX (206) 241 -2191 DESCRIPTION OF ISSUE/INCIDENT: (attach additional into as appropriate) Th .e. Curren l a. 1 o . )a$55" U VA ve . +ha+ eou t d c rQiio s'ori5 0)- e<rn,yo,0/5 MINN ,' , / i1- Lifts C /s(t i..u�Y4(! 16 iik b �.e'e71 lea k had 411 yr /feed u,1. der k s{.e., ...4 ( - 1 Os, Y'OU'l;n�P f«.11k Y' c/000..1 it i. der 1:cl7ch k n, k ,yt �r a /'n; -J,'-nt '. n itcl -1 LIP 1 (. / ik., 1 . ' ' . i ' ' t)C / s c, ' Q 1 - . - • WV ICS • , A iYrlars L. / ' b • , w' /, t • it ( 1 ✓. ( . k ■ 1 • • , . 0 ,lie 14112 Aai'e fik2 ,fo ii &lift' / 1 '' .,.._. :— Lc,k �hi5 1 4 0 Li/ rue ailfk et ioi 1, e C / r I , '.i O 4 k. Al t p 0/ .) Pert( la'Y.M1, l's ` -' t 4 �R `. • 1k ! Lic�C{e ( p.e.y�u I Id, r I / 1+ 07' . 1J U. i c[cl , (1 : cis u3;411 oLt ACTION TAKEN: Leo 'e1A ' (? / e CA., LI 1ian 'b t n k ux• • L c' • , '-- YI • i. • `" i L V ' M ' P v • ! LJ, r 4 . 1 - % /'' , - Law' • 0 MIIIMEM • o 1011111MMffilMWM u • / • e - . i 1 � ..a t I. ' • . s ( i ? ' is u.��l 'Qr E Pi? :.o � . r . i �� 11 f1 " �' i k,) • ,' C.�� ( r � . � '(� in�Y1C II-- h . yU )k . '4`� Lv01 k o'o' - rv-:1 r wee.ker-n s � � �Z ' � 1 ay ct.f< < c�tn� - � can. r,�nrl C��as do l4-41 de I . L , .1 ` c Q ea .l .�� d • . F & . ► ' ri Q4ici .- • 0 • I Vi c ? t / ' nn //�� • �i ' L ♦ ..► .1 , • $ N .. I J ou t 1 /r - I I • ( -• 1 IY I eon iile9 - , , a c' c/ �` 2 c • . : .i t. ,r i 1 .. . ' la r • ■►.I .41 t 1 c.Q( b e -ll 'nuec - -- ACTION ANTICIPATED /REQUESTED: 11-V15. - , Beeletf2. i Ica' ynu i '1 5 .49 1 JLf k4ioc$ ae}icryt 1 E 112/343 ta.ke.61. amyl Log c1z (b yte G 1 v at-i-; 0 i'ff (.14- {1co i v Ccff -e OL YtPCc%/'oe Q??► Utz l. io?15. 1 fictoE tPceiv4 -c•( W i/)t ' , i 11 ' 44 r 1 0 • 1 - . 0 f l' kr( I .1 4/ • I . 0 pNob) t Ok't Ali) iN4( .> - )160.2k. . F"52 '1 . 0 % 1fi9.f1- u3;411 oLt h..�2, f ) y Vhi.Jkr4 © jce t 1(l �•l1p o4t•2 (J,tlu(i1 }'t?. o4 who '15 oil ca "/ cot h o . . , ) : _ 1 . i - e 4 - Lo i 1 1 -441_,-) ,-• it 5 . r'f L a /; inn , DEPARTMENT 5j /d �; J DC 0 DATE: 67.-/ - �Y INITIATOR: CITY OF U TKWI INFORM TION SHEET '..''' '''i:' KwNVKJ%vi City Adm. For your Information Response requested immediate response requested DISTRIBUTION: Original - Mayor's Office; cc: i k 4'G 1') F ly HUDSON & ASSOCIATES May 9, 1989 David Kehle, Architect 12878 Interurban Ave South Seattle, WA 98168 Re: Time Q.C. Building Dear Dave: Enclosed find a detail for the exterior non - bearing partition wall. It is designed for UBC wind forces on the building. Very truly yours, Rick Hudson RICHARD HUDSON 8e ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1605 12TH AVENUE • SUITE 18 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 206 - 324 -6160 S. 9.1989 8:51 P. 1 Crr�Y OF� a Mi\Y 9 7989 OUILDJNQ Der. .. L.. ak ift 0113 4144 RICHARD HUDSON & A c; dOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1605 12TH AVENUE • SUITE 18 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98122 206- 324 -6160 J 1 co S , vi, ca El a :u 9 \IN . 4 z t- r , JOB Tien%. 6 , 1:bo l LDi N SHEET NO, CALCULATED BY CHECKED BY SCALE t II 1 OF 1 U� r 4UVSOtJ DATE `�1 1 1 i— 4 % 2 2 DATE w U- c J • W ' 0' 3 2 fl • `9 !- q 0 J 2 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor 1 TO: Duane Griffin, Building Official FROM: Becky Davis, Permit Coordinator DATE: February 16, 1990 SUBJECT: Time DC Permits MEMORANDUM Attached are three files for the Time DC permits dealing with decontamina- tion of soil and demolition of part of the Time DC building. In summary: Application #89 -039 to remove existing metal building, slab and foundations in two phases. Phase 1, westerly 161' and phase 2 the balance in June 1989. This application was never approved as submitted. Application #89 -094 to remove part of the Time DC maintenance building. This application was never approved as submitted. Application #89 -106 to excavate contaminated soil, clean and replace back to its formal state. This application was approved, see Permit #5604. The first two applications have not yet been closed, but both hold important documentation and supporting materials applicable to the entire project. Part of the building was demolished but a specific permit was not issued for this work, nor for the phase 2 demolition. Because this work was done under emergency conditions I recall that we let them proceed ahead. However, it would probably be a good idea to complete the process and our paper work. Attached are the files. Let me know if I can be of any assistance in closing this project.