Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 2655 - Dojac Corporation - Amfac Fluid PowerPermit no. • CITY of TUKVC 6'.A Control no.83=292 Central Permit System BUILDING PERMIT V LASS" DATE OF ISSUANCE EXPIRES / /-T_ 516 1 When no activity for 180 days JOB ADDRESS 365 Upland Drive LEGAL DESCR. I LOT NO. BLOCK FIRE ZONE TRACT IR SEE ATTACHED SHEET OWNER Dojac Corporation SMOKE r TR PHONE 575-8595 0EIP Mpl and Drive, Seattle, WA .136 98188 CONTRACTOR IMYES ONO PHONE Hugh S. Ferguson Co. 767,..3810 ADDRESS enclose ZIP 7433 5th Ave. South, Seattle., WA 198108 LICENSE N0, slope SST NO, 223 -01 -FE -RG -UH -5370N0 C578,23619 BUILDING USE TENANT Hydraulic Motor Assembly Amfac Fluid Power CLASS OF WORK El NEW ❑ADDITION [:(REMODEL OREPAIR 0 T.I. ❑OTHER (Specify) BLDG. 1st FL. 2nd FL. BASEMENT GARAGE DECK MEZZANINE # OF STORYS AREA 50 485 311258 1 CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT, FEE BUILDING TH H TE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE DISTRIB, PLAN RVW, M ND THAT I AM AN AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROJECT. DEMOLITION % BOND OTHER tsu:laing vn1 COMMENTS: TOTAL S.F. I VALUATION 14,000 105.00 TOTALI 173. TYPE CONST. OCC. GROUP OCC. LOAD FIRE ZONE USE ZONE SPRINKLERS SMOKE r TR III.,N-Sp, 5. Wall. .136 Rte- CTM IMYES ONO OYES ONO FOR INSPECTION CALL 433-1844 1. Driveway 2, OK to 3. Roof 4. OK to 5. Wall. 6, Structure approach and pour footing sheathing enclose board complete and/ slope and/or and nailing framing nailing or OK to foundation OK OK occupy I CNAN I IMYtSUVtMLr41 AFFKUVAL : Dale: Date: Fire Department Building Official •'+� `"C;^•i�9;�"'^. i; 77 `"i"'"r'•. fWC 'i"^•,;.l:p :'Rr:'r-kTat 'eT. :r� -•^'+.-^^..^ ?r.it= ; ei^'1'";!":t't"'w"-r'�,'F`;iy�1 ';« j^*'""°,.-<.v,.....�5 =~� CITY of TUKV�-LA Control no.83- 292 ! Central Permit System • r BUILDING PERMIT r CLASS OF WORK :rte El NEW ❑ADDITIONREMODEL L,OREPAIRn OT -1. w0OTHER (Specify)tt ..,^ ..,• � BLDG 1st FL. 2nd FL. BASEMENT GARAGE DECK MEZZANINE #f OF STORYS TOTAL S.F. VALUATION AREA ..ti_ .5U 486 g 14,0()0 I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION iS TRUE AND CORRECT, BUILDING 105:Qi1""" FEE THAT)THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE PLAN RVW. $. DISTRIB. M �1ND THAT I AM `AN AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR TH PROJECT. DEMOLITION BOND DATE OF ISSUANCE EXPIRES When no activity for 180 days JOB ADDRESS i'D 365 Upland Drive complete and/ LEGAL DESCR. LOT NO. .�... BLOCK TRACT �l SEE ATTACHED SHEET OWNER or OK to PHONE Uajac Corporation foundation OK 575»8595 a u A.�n4pland Drive, Seattle, 1r1A.p•.�.x._.�...�...�.,,.,.�....,....,..m.,...�..�.».�.,...•,..�._ occupy ��1 88 CONTRACTOR PHONE Hugh S. Ferguson Co. ~�...,,�,��.� „a,,,_,•r_.,,_w�,w._ 767»3810 ADDRESS .. ZIP 743:3 5th Ave. South, Seattle�� �:Sl�,,., .,...�»..,.� .. __ ASST • 198810 LICENSE NO. NO. 223M01-FE-kG-UW-5370NQ C578-,p236�,y vWw•w.+.n-N.....w.0-nwn .. ...w...... R. +t .•.. ._ . .. ,. .. ... ,BUILDING USE TENANT Hydraulic Motor Assembly CLASS OF WORK :rte El NEW ❑ADDITIONREMODEL L,OREPAIRn OT -1. w0OTHER (Specify)tt ..,^ ..,• � BLDG 1st FL. 2nd FL. BASEMENT GARAGE DECK MEZZANINE #f OF STORYS TOTAL S.F. VALUATION AREA ..ti_ .5U 486 g 14,0()0 I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION iS TRUE AND CORRECT, BUILDING 105:Qi1""" FEE THAT)THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE PLAN RVW. $. DISTRIB. M �1ND THAT I AM `AN AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR TH PROJECT. DEMOLITION BOND i'D board complete and/ slope and/or and nailing framing SIU nailing or OK to foundation OK ( OK occupy • AtiifaC Fluid Power COMMENTS: .,r MY' •T7YPgj E �CONST. OCC. GROUP OCC. LOA FIRE ZONE USE ZONE SPRINKLERS SMOKE f TR p. ,�.3) OTHER TOTAL FOR INSPECTION CAI I 41.1 _1Qdo 1. Driveway 2. OK to 3. Roof A. OK to /,� 6. Wall- 6. Structure approach and pour footing sheathing enclose I tIVAIV I IMYI1UVtMtIV 1 AF'YMVVAL Date; Date: Fire Department Building O!licial i'U1C% ArnwAIT wwM i n-.- n.-. w�........-. .��.........�. .... .�. .. �_. _. .•' — --. _ CPSForm� i'D board complete and/ slope and/or and nailing framing SIU nailing or OK to foundation OK ( OK occupy I tIVAIV I IMYI1UVtMtIV 1 AF'YMVVAL Date; Date: Fire Department Building O!licial i'U1C% ArnwAIT wwM i n-.- n.-. w�........-. .��.........�. .... .�. .. �_. _. .•' — --. _ CPSForm� ,. -: , ., . i' ' ... I.. r..'. .. .. '� ,., .:: .. .. .. : . :�; .. .. .,., '., ..:. .. .. .. . '; r .. 1 .. r �ii7at A��l4MNIbU�rW,+uw+..—. - . _ ,— .. .,ms...µ C , ... , �. . . .. .. ' i . .. .. .. , .. .. ,Il , .. . 44 ;t ; :INSPECTION REQUEST .. ti. .. Pei mi't # 46 -j �� Date // ` /�— Tenant Time f; �-2� Address : ,!` .I .I�f I Date Wanted: //--/(a af!m, p.m. Contr. owner Type of -Inspection /L --e— . j - :' �: "�' "ll I. -.1 : ."ll -� � --:�� '�"� �""' "�'*'-'�.� t'? "', . . I � . —) 2t,11 u-'� 4-.,.I2 �a �2-�. . I Req. By d��� V p' /)Lean Taken By . V v -?: -� - �-5- �' S'- v / /�' 0 9 , t i1. �..'k7 I. L. . i .. t ,. , .. '. - . .. Signed. Bililding Inspector I ".0 En V rq to C: M r--q cz 0 z ri m 4) 0 > 0 LO) $4 .1 0 = Sl O w > 0 V) (n C) .=. r4 *r>q 4J JJ > -4 AJ U) P% w �11 (1) tP li Lrl I U CL w M 4-) r- Z) Z) > u r-4 ri rq —j u :z w -^ 4J ro In �4 T. i. M. 0 Li cn j !4 4-J 0 M m -4 4J P4 �4 > m AJ Ef r M. 0 44 - W Gm M -4 W Li W *.r. 41 0 0 >1 r-4 u 4-) w n x mr r. U -4 rl C. :.'d V) r) j V) r -4 to C) Ili V > u W -W 14 sw Li ra Cil C: --4 1 o. M. = e pppp f1 4j -rq (n 0 r- 0 (a r-4 rd 014 r-4 0 to U4 Ll ri c &J > 0 0 .r4 .&j Fj v r--4 E-4 V) U= to 0 U4 1 " " " (a m r-4 ro lu >% w a) 1••1to b Ob0 0 ;n v w = L 0. tJ1 S4 U " J) 13 0 r4 ri 9 >1 0 -rA 4-) U is X Li u 14 0 -H V G. Q $4 u= N E j CD - u ro U) r-4 m " 0. :5 m 14 w W ro ro m U 01 -4 39 z 9 co W M Au -0 (a u "0 a, 0 M r- r4 w a w w C: - c 41 (D r-q fl w 0 w fd. w u w 0 0 0 0 r-I tP CYN ON 3 0 -r4'14 ej •r4 -4 to to a N U 9) U. "a -j -4 -A • 00 r-I $4 0 0 0 u lu 4j 14 t7 'i u W -r4 .a 4 C CO 0 u 41 to r- NW m t0 4) 0 v -0 CA) Q) r-4 &J M, -V4 -A a r-4 1.1 U) W r- w > 9 4 (� 0 0 r-4 9: r-4 -4 -A 1 s .0 .0 iv M. ro Ul . r-4 (U I > r-4 X 0 W = = J) j c 1: V) 0 w -1 o- 0 z C� c; International Conference of Building officials REGIONAL OFFICE: 17544 MIDVALE AVENUE N., SUITE 304 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98133 (206) 542-9421 BOARD OF DIRECTORS OFFICES OF JERRY A BARBERA, P.E. PRESIDENT REGIONAL MANAGER JACK S. ATKINS, P.E. FRANK S. NATSUHARA, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL1 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR May 15, 1984 REGIONAL ENGINEER PLACERVILLE. CALIFORNIA FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT JOHN E. MAULDING, P.E. BUILDING OFFICIAL LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA Lorraine Cronk SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT Building Official BUIDLDING SAFETY DIRECTOR AVID A. BASSETT, P.E. 6200 Southcenter Blvd. MEDFORD, OREGON Tukwila, WA 98188 IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT H.T."TED"MAN,P.E. DIRECTORECTORSUBJECT: DESIGN LOADS ON NONBEARING FIRE RATED INTERIOR DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING PARTITIONS. SECTION 2309, 1982 UBC DES MOINES, IOWA " CHARLES CLAWSON Dear Ms. Cronk: DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ARLINGTON, TEXAS Your letter of May 11; 1984 asks two questions in connection SOL J. JACOBS. P.E. with a nonbearing 1 hour steel stud partition. I will answer NNELI INSPECTIONS each question in the same numerical order as written in the WILLIAM J. JUSTEN, P.E. letter: DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND LAND USE 1. In our opinion, gypsum wallboard would be considered flex - SEATTLE, WASHINGTON ible. May I direct your attention to a system approved under DONALD T.MecRAE,RE. Technical Report 1715, page 9 of 41 in which the term flexible STATE BUILDING COMMISSIONER STATE OF INDIANA -is-defined under similar conditions. ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING COUNCIL INDIANAPOLIS; INDIANA MICHAEL J.NOLTE .2. The UBC requires interior walls to be designed to resist SUPERINTENDENT OFBUILDING INSPECTION all loads•y Jecnoless to which the are subjected but t lthan 5 p sf INSP EUGENE,OREGON applied perpendicular t0 the wall. Section 2309 MARK R. RODMAN DIRECTOR BUILDING SERVICES a. The UBC does not prescribe any design load for moving SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS equipment impact against nonbearing walls. ( You may WILLIAM E,SCHLECHT Wish to submit a code change prescribing such a load). MANAGER, BUILDING, PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION Nor does it require protection of the rated wall as VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON stipulated for columns under Section 4303(b)5 or re - DAVID SCOTT, RE. DIRECTOR quire protective barriers as provided for appliances DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING in Section 508, UMC SAFETY TEMPE. ARIZONA RONALD R.TREMBLAY b. UBC Standard 43-1,. Section 43.113 and 43.114, describes CHIEF BUILDING AND the minimum size and restraint conditions of a wall ZONING A,KANSASR test specimen for a fire test. The hose stream test is CHARLES W. VOLZ, A.I.A. part of the conditions of acceptance and as a standard CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL does not mean that a 27'3" actual wall would have to DIVISION OF CODE ADMINISTRATION ALBUOUEROUE,NEW MEXICO pass the hose stream test. STANLEY WHEELER CHIEF LIVERMORE.ILIFORNIA the design load required on a nonbear- ing onbear- LIMORE, CALIFORNIA C • In our opinion, EUOENEJ.ZELLER,P.E. i ng wall should be the greater of the loads based on SUPERINTENDENT, BUILDING Table 23-J or 5 psf combined with the dead load. AND SAFETY LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR JAMES E. BIHR, P.E. Main Office: 5360 South Workman Mill Road • Whittier, California 90601 • (213) 699.0541 �,, V`IILA sy City of Tukwila - A %Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Zo Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION BOARD OF APPEALS NOTICE OF HEARING RE: Permit #2655 - 365 Upland Drive, Amfac Fluid Power 5-1-84 84-1 Having received an application for a hearing before the Board of Appeals, notice is hereby given that a hearing has been scheduled for 11:00 A.. M., on Tuesday, May 8, 1984 at Tukwila City Hall at which time you may appear in-person or be represented by an authorized agent, legal, technical or both, and present,reasons which you may have to the granting or denying of this petition. You are advised to prepare your case, in detail, and present all evidence relating to this petition at the time of the.scheduled hearing. Very truly vaurs_ Building Code Board of Appeals requested by Vanderlip & Company on job at 365 Upland Drive, Amfac Fluid Power. Note: Hugh S. Ferguson Co. is contractor of record on Permit #2655. Uniform Building Code Question: Is the intent of the code met by using minimal non -load bearing criteria in a 26-27 foot high required 1 -hour separation wall between an H-2 manufacturing/repair occupancy and a B-2 warehouse occupancy that will potentially be subject to other stresses. Case: 6" 20 guage metal studs at 24" O.C. which, by engineering developed by Devco Engineering, Inc. for manufacturer Grabber Construction, qualify to carry a maximum load of one layer 5/8" wall board each side. This par- ticular occupancy involves metal parts and pumps, handled by forklifts that potentially may subject the wall to accidental bumps. Requirement Made: Use of one row of stablizers or stiffening rods so that any concussion will be spread over several studs, providing the stability of lessened give of larger wall area, as opposed to possible give of one stud at point of impact and rupture of fire separation wall. Option given: Submit signed engineering that the assembly was adequate. In a long distance telephone call, Neal L. Peterson, Engineer of Devco, stated that they had developed the application charts for Grabber Construction and that the only criteria addressed were height, spacing and weight of wall board, with no allowance for any additional loads or stresses. He declined to address this particular situation in greater depth than that. September 30, 1983 Original submission to plan check found to be incomplete. October 7, 1983 Revised plans submitted. October 11, 1983 Additional information requested to be able to plan check. October 28, 1983 Adequate plans received and approved. November 16, 1983 Framing inspection revealed framing completely covered by wall board both sides. Requested expo- sure of framing in a typical area. November 17, to Review of Grabber Metal Stud specification December 6, 1983 material, multiple conversations with James Dunham, conversation with Neal Peterson. 1 • - �, ., ::, . a: ., "'. ,t :.. ... . _ . t. ., t " 11 . .. .: r .. I. ',f / 1 } :�'. .:% .a, �; y .. i ., 1. ) . l . 1 k. Y111 t r � ( , .A t f 3 4 <. Y .7 1 {,:. .. t. ['r I.k."-Sf t S.. � . -I..'-*' " _,. . ,. .,....,w ... .. ... . .w .. _ ..: I � I I I � I � I I I . I I I � na,. , - .., .. 1, .+. i ,- ,.«,... ., . ..., »,x hr.rr!,Rt�'Airv.3:tn `tSl' I S l ..:.i,i: ,.. � I I � � � � I � I � . . � . : -11 't " I . L-1. I. 11 . ; �� . . - I .-I . I I I I-- - I - I I ,�.. +,�- - - � -, I I . -�.-,�-- I " - . I . I � I I " � � , , I I � � I � . � I I . � . I I I I � , � I ` I - I } (/ . .. . I � � . � I . . � � I � I I I . I i , . � � � I � . II , �f * I . ,. - � I - ��.. I .1 .1 I . I � I .1 1. I I - I I � I () . . � I .:I 1. . ;, : Summation:. . The delays and extra. expense 1.incurred on this job were the result of " incomplete plan submissions and not observing standard inspection proce- . dares. � No further'' inspections have been requested since the corrected framing was approved.on December 6, 1983. No Certificate of Occupancy has . been issued, "placing this premises, if occupied, in violation of the . Uniform Building Code.. Copies of substantiating documents attached. . LC/blk.11 I1. .. ~. .. 11:- . . .... .' . :. r.' ., .. , .., ` 1. i/ I , ... '. '.. ', .'. . .... .. .. .. .: .. ... . .. .. .. � .', '. ... ' , ; ,. :' : '. '. 11 .. :'.. ... .. .. .. . .. .. . i. •" •. Z f'. t. I , .� Vanderlip& Company December 6, 1983 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Amfac Fluid Power 365 Upland Dr. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Sirs: g 1993 C11 Y 5 1. ".<VViLA On November 16, 1983, Ms. Cronk of your Building Division informed us the we had failed the framing inspection on the above referenced project. We failed due to not having not requested an inspection prior to covering the framing. On November 17, 1983 we removed certain pieces of GWB for Ms. Cronk to proceed with her inspection. Ms. Cronk then rejected our framing, stating we needed draft stops @ 10' O.C. all walls. (See enclosed correction notice.) After researching the UBC 1982 Edition, we informed MS. Cronk that fireblocking was not necessary in this wall system. She then agreed. Ms. Cronk in now stating that we are lacking the appropriate wall stiffeners for lateral movement. We checked the approved drawings and our metal stud manual and found that @ 5 PSF @ L/120 (no wind factor and one layer of 5/8" GWB on each side), no stiffeners are required for 6" 20 gage metal studs @ 24" O.C.. After submitting this informatio to Ms. Cronk, she then informed us that the lateral movement in question was the possibility of a pallet or fork lift bumping the wall, therefore we still did not pass inspection. Ms. Cronk suggested that we supply her with a letter from a Washington State Engineer supporting the construction application of the metal studs on this project. On November 28, 1983, we received a letter from Neal Peterson of Devco Engineering. I presented the letter to Ms. Cronk on November 29, and she rejected it stating it did not address the issue. We have an obligation to our customer to complete this project within a certain time frame, therefore on December 3 we proceeded with the corrective measures Ms. Cronk had advised us would bring our framing up to code. We would like to inform you that we are requesting a hearing per UBC section #204 that provides for a Board of Appeals to review the suitability of alternate materials and methods of construction and to provide reasonable interpretations of the Uniform Building Code. 14856 N.E. 95th St. - Redmond, WA 98052. (206) 885-4110 VA -N D -EC -*216J P ENGINEERING INC =_NGINEERING. PLANNING, SURVEYING, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT November 23, 1983 Mr. Jim Dunham Vanderlip and Company 14856 NE 95th Street Redmond, Washington 97052 RE: Anfac Project 365 Uplands Drive Dear Mr. Dunham: This letter is written in response to our telephone conversation concerning the referenced project. Based on the height of installation of 26 to 27 feet, the 6"WC 20 gauge member at 24" o.c. is acceptable for an interior use with.a 5 psf. As you indicated, there is 5/8 inch gypsum wall board attached to each flange which provides the lateral stability required to prevent rotational twisting of the wall stud. The attachment of the wall board meets the requirements of Section 5.1 of the American Iron and Steel Institutes "Specification for the Design of Cold -Formed Steel Structural Members". It is not uncommon that horizontal bridging at the mid -point is required in addition to the wall board. This relates to the building code which requires horizontal blocking for wood wall studs. This is not the case for metal wall'studs, as the gypsum wall board. supplies the required stability. Ou--t< � i rm has been involved i n the light gauge metal structural' member design since 1974. We currently provided the structural engineering required for Grabber Construction Supply in Seattle, Washington. If you or the building department involved with this project have any questions concerning the application of light gauge cold rolled metal products to the building industry, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Neal L. Peterson, P.E. General Manager CC: Mark - Grabber Construction 33900 EASTGATE CIRCLE, P.O. BOX 1@11, CORVALLIS, OR 97339 1503) 757-8991 Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 3/6" square edged regular gypsum wallboard or backing board applied parallel to each side of 21/2" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. in each 50 stud and top & bottom track. Face layer 1/2" type X gypsum WP 1053 wallboard, or veneer base or predecorated gypsum wallboard t0 applied on each side parallel to studs with 13/6" type S drywall 54 screws 8" o.c. to top and bottom runners only. Laminating compound In 3/4" wide continuous beads 12" o.c. used between base and face layers. Stagger joints 24" each layer and side. Sound tested using 31/2" glass fiber friction fit in stud space. (NLB). Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Metal Studs One layer 1/2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied WP 1070 parallel to each side of 21/2 " metal studs 24" o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and 12" o.c. to Intermediate studs. 2" mineral fiber 2.5 pcf friction fit in stud space. Also fire tested with 11/2" mineral fiber 3.0 pcf stapled to board in stud spaces. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs One,layer 5/s" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to each side of 21/2" metal studs 24" o.c. WP 1076 with 11/4" type Sdrywall screws 8" o.c. around perimeter of (dw) assembly and 12"o.c. at board edges. Wallboard fastened to' , ' intermediate studs with continuous 1/4" beads of adhesive or 11/4" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. 23/4" glass fiber 0.65 pcf friction fit in stud space. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs One layer 5/611 type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied 45 parallel to each side of 35/6" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and vertical joints and 12" o.c. t0 WP 1080 to Intermediate studs. Face layer 5/e" type X gypsum wallboard 49 or veneer base applied on one side parallel to studs with 15/6" type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and sides and 12" o.c, to Intermediate studs. Apply 1/2" beads of laminating compound 2" o.c. to full field of face layer. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. Sound tested using 31/2" glass fiber in stud space. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 1/4 " gypsum wallboard applied parallel to each side of 15/e" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws 24" WP 1090 o.c. to edges and 36" o.c, to intermediate studs. Face layer 1/2 " type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied on each side parallel to studs with 15/6" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Stag- ger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 1/2" regular gypsum' wallboard or veneer base ap- plied parallel to each side of 15/6" metal studs 24" o.c. with i" WP 1110 type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Face layer 1/2 " regular gypsum wallboard orveneer base applied on each side parallel to studs with We" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (NLB) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire I Sound Thickness: 41/4 " Limiting Height: 13' 10" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: ULC 74T184, Design W402, 4-10.75 Sound Test: CK 8104.02, 2.3.81 Thickness: 31/2" Limiting Height: 13'50 Approx. Weight: 5 psf Fire Test: FM WP 51.1, 9.22.66 Sound Test: RAL TL 69.42, 10.17.68 Thickness: 33/4" Limiting Height: 131511 x Approx. Weight: 6psf, . Fire Test: ULC 78T55, Design W409, 1.9.79 Sound Test: DRC 70.2.2, 1.6.70 Fire Side MEN Fire Side Thickness: 51/2" Limiting Heigght: 17p' 3" Fire Test v0SU T-3240, 10.1.65 Sound Test: RAL TL 77.12, 10.8.76 i - 3--Z Thickness: 31/6" Limiting Height, 10'10N Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: UC, 12.28.65 Sound Test: ACI 7.1152019 c, 12.29.65 Thickness: 35/e" Limiting Height: 1214m Approx. Weight: 9 psf Fire Test: Ug, 9.21.64 Sound Test: KG 374,6-24-66 13 M•'�4i�'.%3"/moi[»+� ��.ur��w.-ham....:-' ...�S..i:.,�X4.'..'r.i�a�f. i.ir. .... .. .. ... . ... Sound GA Rating K I No. DETAILED DESCRIPTION Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 3/6" square edged regular gypsum wallboard or backing board applied parallel to each side of 21/2" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. in each 50 stud and top & bottom track. Face layer 1/2" type X gypsum WP 1053 wallboard, or veneer base or predecorated gypsum wallboard t0 applied on each side parallel to studs with 13/6" type S drywall 54 screws 8" o.c. to top and bottom runners only. Laminating compound In 3/4" wide continuous beads 12" o.c. used between base and face layers. Stagger joints 24" each layer and side. Sound tested using 31/2" glass fiber friction fit in stud space. (NLB). Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Mineral Fiber, Metal Studs One layer 1/2" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied WP 1070 parallel to each side of 21/2 " metal studs 24" o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and 12" o.c. to Intermediate studs. 2" mineral fiber 2.5 pcf friction fit in stud space. Also fire tested with 11/2" mineral fiber 3.0 pcf stapled to board in stud spaces. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs One,layer 5/s" proprietary type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to each side of 21/2" metal studs 24" o.c. WP 1076 with 11/4" type Sdrywall screws 8" o.c. around perimeter of (dw) assembly and 12"o.c. at board edges. Wallboard fastened to' , ' intermediate studs with continuous 1/4" beads of adhesive or 11/4" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. 23/4" glass fiber 0.65 pcf friction fit in stud space. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs One layer 5/611 type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied 45 parallel to each side of 35/6" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and vertical joints and 12" o.c. t0 WP 1080 to Intermediate studs. Face layer 5/e" type X gypsum wallboard 49 or veneer base applied on one side parallel to studs with 15/6" type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to edges and sides and 12" o.c, to Intermediate studs. Apply 1/2" beads of laminating compound 2" o.c. to full field of face layer. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. Sound tested using 31/2" glass fiber in stud space. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 1/4 " gypsum wallboard applied parallel to each side of 15/e" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1" type S drywall screws 24" WP 1090 o.c. to edges and 36" o.c, to intermediate studs. Face layer 1/2 " type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied on each side parallel to studs with 15/6" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Stag- ger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 1/2" regular gypsum' wallboard or veneer base ap- plied parallel to each side of 15/6" metal studs 24" o.c. with i" WP 1110 type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Face layer 1/2 " regular gypsum wallboard orveneer base applied on each side parallel to studs with We" type S drywall screws 12" o.c. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and side. (NLB) SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire I Sound Thickness: 41/4 " Limiting Height: 13' 10" Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: ULC 74T184, Design W402, 4-10.75 Sound Test: CK 8104.02, 2.3.81 Thickness: 31/2" Limiting Height: 13'50 Approx. Weight: 5 psf Fire Test: FM WP 51.1, 9.22.66 Sound Test: RAL TL 69.42, 10.17.68 Thickness: 33/4" Limiting Height: 131511 x Approx. Weight: 6psf, . Fire Test: ULC 78T55, Design W409, 1.9.79 Sound Test: DRC 70.2.2, 1.6.70 Fire Side MEN Fire Side Thickness: 51/2" Limiting Heigght: 17p' 3" Fire Test v0SU T-3240, 10.1.65 Sound Test: RAL TL 77.12, 10.8.76 i - 3--Z Thickness: 31/6" Limiting Height, 10'10N Approx. Weight: 7 psf Fire Test: UC, 12.28.65 Sound Test: ACI 7.1152019 c, 12.29.65 Thickness: 35/e" Limiting Height: 1214m Approx. Weight: 9 psf Fire Test: Ug, 9.21.64 Sound Test: KG 374,6-24-66 13 WALLS AND INTERIOR PARTITIONS, NONCOMBUSTIBLE Fire Rating Sound Rating GA File STC No. DETAILED DESCRIPTION and Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs One layer 5/e" type X gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied at right angles or parallel to each side of 35/6" metal studs 24" WP 1200 o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 8" o.c. to vertical edges and top and bottom runners and 12" o.c. to intermediate studs. Thickness: 4/e" Stagger all vertical and horizontal joints 24" o.c. each side. Limiting Height: 17'3- 7' 3" Approx. Approx. Weight: 6 psf 2 (NLB) Fire Test: FM WP.45, 6.1968 OSU T-1770,4161 Sound Test: NGC 2385,7.M70 Construction Type: Gypsum Wallboard, Metal Studs Base layer 31611 regular gypsum wallboard or veneer base applied parallel to each side of 15/6" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1 " type S drywall screws 27" o.c. to edges and 54" o.c. to inter- Thickness: 33'e" WP 1230 mediate studs. Face layer 1/2" regular gypsum wallboard or Limiting Height: 12'0" veneer base attached on each side parallel to studs with 15/a" Approx. Weight: 8 psf type S drywall screws 12" o.c. to perimeter and 24" o.c. to Fire Test: UC, 11.17.64 intermediate studs. Stagger joints 24" o.c. each layer and Sound Test: KG 141, &1464 side. (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Veneer Base, Veneer Plaster, Metal Studs JNV�N 40 t0 One layer 1/2"type X gypsum veneer base appiled parallel or at Thickness: 35'e" 44 WP 1240 right angles to each side of 21/2" metal studs 24" o.c. with 1" " Limiting Height: 14 8 " type S drywall screws 8 o.c. to edges or ends and 12 o.c, to Intermediate studs. Omit screws in top and bottom runners. Approx. Weight: 5 psf Fire Test: LIC, 8.5-63, UC, Stagger joints 24" o.c. each side. Vie" gypsum veneer plaster 11.1.63; UC, 5.3166 applied over both sides. Sound tested with 3" glass fiber in Sound Test: G & H NG-269FT, H R stud space and with studs 16" o.c. (NLB) 12.20.65 Construction Type: Gypsum Lath, Gypsum Plaster Metal Studs '/2 " 1:2 gypsum -sand plaster applied over face of 3/8" plain gyp- sum lath fastened at right angles to each side of 21/2" open WP 1260 web metal studs 16" o.c. with 12 gage galvanized wire clips. 16 Thickness: 41/4" gage furring channel stiffener installed horizontally at mid- Limiting Height: 11'2n Approx. Weight: 14 psf height through web of studs and wire tied. Stagger end joints Fire Test: FM WP -65.1,1.1061 each lath on each side with end joint clips at lath corners. Sound Test: NGC 3042,2-200 (NLB) Construction Type: Gypsum Lath, Gypsum Plaster, Metal Studs WP 1290 1/2" 1:2 gypsum -sand plaster applied over each face of 1/2" Thickness: 41/2" plain gypsum lath attached with 12 gage wire clips at Limiting Height: 912N right angles to each side of 21/2" metal screw type studs Approx. Weight: 15 sf spaced 24" o.c. End joint clips at lath corners. (NLB) Fire Test: FM WP -53,11-29a Sound Test: NGC 2061,10.240 35 Construction Type: Gypsum Plaster, Metal Studs, Metal Lath t0 -WP 1300 5/e" 1:2 gypsum -sand plaster applied over 3.4 Ib. metal lath Thickness: 43/4" attached with 24 gage galvanized steel clips 6" o.c. to each Limiting Height: 13'6' 39 side of 31/4 " open web metal studs spaced 16" o.c. (NLB) Approx. Weight: 13 psf 7 OSU T-4228,11.116 Fire Test: Sound Test: NGC 3039,1.2769 14 SKETCH AND DESIGN DATA Fire � 0 /. 43-1 U.B.C. STANDARDS Fire Test Procedures Fire -endurance Test Sec. 43.107. The fire -endurance test on the sample with its applied load, if any, shy; be continued until failure.occurs, or until the sample has withstood the test conditions fa,, period equal to that herein specified in the conditions of acceptance for the given t)TV t{ construction. For the purpose of obtaining additional performance data, the test may be contacse beyond the time the fire -endurance classification is determined. Hose Stream Test Sec. 43.108. (a) General. Where required by the conditions of acceptance, a duptcaAr sample shall be subjected to a fire -exposure test for a period equal to one half of tit indicated as the resistance period in the fire -endurance test, but not for more than one h 4 immediately after which the sample shall be subjected to the impact, erosion and co.44 effects of a hose stream directed first at the middle and then at all parts of the exposed fa", changes in direction being made slowly. (b) Exemption. The hose stream test shall not be required in the case of construaco, having a resistance period, indicated in the fire -endurance test, of less than one hour. (c) Optional Program. The submitter may elect, with the advice and consent of 6f testing body, to have the hose stream test made on the sample subjected to the fire-endur=c test and immediately following the expiration of the fire -endurance test. (d) Stream Equipment and Details. The stream shall be delivered through a 21A.-imi hose discharging through a National Standard Playpipe of corresponding size equipped %a a 1 4 -inch discharge tip of the standard -taper smooth -bore pattern without shoulder at LSt orifice. The water pressure and duration of application shall be as prescribed in Table No 43.1-A. TABLE NO.43.1•A--CONDITIONS FOR HOSE STREAM TEST (e) Nozzle Distance. The nozzle orifice shall be 20 feet from the center of the exrk' ' surface of the test sample if the nozzle is so located that when directed at the center its ass n 1082 1982 norm shill the n TIMI Se ns fr remc $Ceti Coni Nre acro ecce surf; dire P reas that s con ftor witl are ma i Iibi the col evi m i the T as j di di L 1( n b s e WATER DURATION OF PRESSURE APPLICATION RESISTANCE PERIOD AT BASE Of(Minutes NOZZLE per 100 (Pounds per Square Feet AREA Square Inch) EXPOSED 8 hours and over .............................. 45 6 4 hours and over if less than 8 hours............................................ 45 5 2 hours and over if less than 4 hours............................................ 30 21h 11/2 hours and over if less than 2 hours............................................ 30 11h 1 hour and over if less than 11/2 hours ............................................ 30 1 Less than 1 hour, if desired ............ 30 1 (e) Nozzle Distance. The nozzle orifice shall be 20 feet from the center of the exrk' ' surface of the test sample if the nozzle is so located that when directed at the center its ass n 1082 1982 norm shill the n TIMI Se ns fr remc $Ceti Coni Nre acro ecce surf; dire P reas that s con ftor witl are ma i Iibi the col evi m i the T as j di di L 1( n b s e 43.1 U.B.C. STANDARDS 1982 Conditions of Acceptance Cond Sec. 43.112. The test shall be regarded as successful if the following conditions are met: Sec. 1. The wall or partition shall have sustained the applied load during the fire-endurance load d test without passage of flame or gases hot enough to ignite cotton waste, for a period equal to desirci that for which classification is desired. 2. The wall or partition shall have sustained the applied load during the fire and hose stream test as specified in Section 43.108, without passage of flame, of gases hot enough to Applt ignite cotton waste, or of the hose stream. The assembly shall be considered to have failed Sec the hose stream test if an opening develops that permits a projection of water from the stream used : ;.; beyond the unexposed surface during the time of the hose stream test, 119- 3. Transmission of heat through the wall or partition during the fire-endurance test shall not re Yl'?. not have been such as to raise the temperature on its unexposed surface more than 250o F. Size above its initial temperature. Sec ea.,,.. Tests of Nonbearing Walls and Partitions that is is dei Size of Sample peach vertic Sec. 43.113. The area exposed to fire shall be not less than 100 square feet, with neither Th • - dimension less than 9 feet. The test specimen shall be restrained on all four edges, great s Conditions of Acceptance the et .'• t. Sec. 43.114. The test shall be regarded as successful if the following conditions are met: ofco 1. The wall or partition shall have withstood the fire-endurance test without passage of prolte pr o ' flame or gases hot enough to ignite cotton waste, for a period equal to that for which Th classification is desired, then 2. The wall or partition shall have withstood the fire and hose stream test as specified in Tem F Section 43.108, without passage of flame, of gases hot enough to ignite cotton waste, or of Sc "r the hose stream. The assembly shall be considered to have failed the hose stream test if an three opening develops that permits a projection of water from the stream beyond the unexposed from a. surface during the time of the hose stream test. spac t 3. Transmission of heat through the wall or partition during the fire-endurance test shall tem I ;:. ° not have been such as to raise the temperature on its unexposed surface more than 250F. Exp c; '•. above its initial temperature. i S, �. .r Tests of Columns side Size of Sample Cot Sec. 43.115. The length of the column exposed to fire shall, when practicable, approxi- S y mate the maximum clear length contemplated by the design, and for building columns shall the + be not less than 9 feet. The contemplated details of connections, and their protection if any, rail shall be applied according to the methods of acceptable field practice. 100 Loading Ott Sec. 43.116, During the fire endurance test the column shall be exposed to fire on all ? ' sides and shall be loaded in a manner calculated to develop theoretically, as nearly as Ap, practicable, the, working stresses contemplated by the design. Provision shall be made for ; ,.. transmitting the load to the exposed portion of the column without unduly increasing the atu r , effective column length. um If the submitter and the building official jointly so decide, the column may be subjected to one and three-fourths times its designed working load before the fire-endurance test is the `WMI undertaken. The fact that such a test has been made shall not be construed as having had a act. y� '1•' deleterious effect on the fire-endurance test performance, up 1084 t, �„ u• ,� O !2 .G L O. n o 33 y E ai u s C L •y 'C a[i b F Z W 0 r f: h+I i'e0is 3 3 O o, Eyp•�°+ p, e u pWy ,O..a r w"� e u c o v o � u'" u ca �' U Jc a CL c m ou u c �a �.. t 'O C w O .3 E,_�o lu L O. 'G O Sao c�a `� �, 1� u Q .. OD p •-• o00uuEyEc u v u O lu v w ca u, Z Z =E°Juccua a°,� uJ 00 0 C 4 `� 'vN u L 7 7 to ° w — 'b'C 2 O LLI u E d ° C*C L p u3iatj r A au, .. ca $ y° G a v EEc Go�0cE f°eE Fav A Nm .0 u>OCQ$ EuL a O u �p z¢ 00$ a00 o u .: �i c ° ,o v_ 3w b edb E� $ .. v$ h,oEy 3 _•�' 3 Xw,o EAu::oC y :° �Q =O C C E G uA $ u 'O^ �'C �L ttj y 'n H eca C zs uL ,0.�+ ti Zm U C• No3 ��uac" 0 CL 'o>mu..cs.'ES °o��.uC .ruGo w'u i—un w+1aba%n3 L E Ou C o .kO�TE �yeC" 3ooc C7 ,dL3C, �4O o WPC:y N N M Qvi O C C �Q E> Tv w'i>nOiva� �y� C ° u—� i l Ogo N� Ag�,a„t�:". 3 'mNaZ• T H E R to dC .D ' 3 LT^M, c 3•O u Oy>O u c0cE .0o o ° E� o O a cu�i a �o r N o. > o I c„ 0 0 0 �, co ao ^ W c v v �v ° e E c e t 3 hb E �•o �� N e a N O �py d n e A C O° C C to •^ +I L O C 0 e c E 7 E c L r m< Z p A u 12 ��F;H� 0 E- 3 m C $moo^�^ Oi ti�CC uvb Ar 'E o E N ►co z� r0c c o is •'0 5m7 > n my oy rV 'r" c �G' ,a OF —'$0O e� ea is u 7 Q ^"rte r.' u z N C=wO to Yah ,3.� �'C °J L r u�i O > C E.0 m VC \ r N S 6 Aau�> L �L'.��e�a E• E Q i tTi u .. mc wu0r- 0 • '� .. '� '3 ' l -6 O .G O �i U C C vo cO.� C ucvnw�+cc4# u o reNao°v Y . , j �—uaca mv 13 wE w . o caYO u u Z .�a op .m ° ow O0 •v u mc oC E u it0 u N o :o a Q C C"C Gao O. >�v C0 U a.0eQ��yt+i C Z a >0 40 m o w ^ QLOcE .> NQ`4O0 � Sia— C «f ° O N J tD� E.E u e x �t mV. mu �' C o' We � � H A '^ G 1"i 'v� o u o 3 c �° E-• 3,? u o u•o 0 �— c� CaUpj� uGu$�$t°or 'Ed �EQv` ccatp`pv us y^8 0 3 C m C = L u G.. O O �21 Nyd w N p C) C A i 3v �$ o >.mu > 0 3 '�Z 84.T c°a E cu°,iaa �°, ° q«„ °u�o.-clu Ea w$v41 ca 3 A3= C7 H v N uwCC lS�nu �= a v o o•a c Ert N C E u cc gv u u Z�C►`� a�E $�oo��°0'° c'ua aOcu�� poa 0OcE °3Zo� 0 m O C .D �W pL•� ... V:• V •C to C� u1]_�" L 1O C O T V a.. p c— a 3 e aso ca 10 w'a m E i°'O o, i u u m ii u u E'—uc o_r k N « �,°� E'; E c90 w 13 o ° c rV E -r., C LZ = "t rFi° vv11 c u '� :: U 7 'C .0 vim C c O " n7 0, C W m ►. o N O� NV�.-,.E �> Td b uw °°� uEI" m ? H ow T°c �� u ` _ cy 3, c o c gs o N a Ls'� r$ !r C d, Y! c 3 ow m 3v:•c W 3w c 3 3 Q v .�„ m b r i a ^' t? ooc .a'; CMVL^ 5r u 3 v u= �p oz r.. c o cn o�� r� � . aa° C��g NOS a o U. N u E _� E ro v� �'inL 3 �+ .. 6-0 uL y :° o o c c e Z C u c_o 3�c3 c y• ZoL00 CI v Q Hca u C fir _ r` a 3 � k x ._ N E ca �: ° ri � � — ^ �s � cm u 1-0 X `' e �� E� ¢ c E e� IN s� aFu a ►mss m 065138 i 9 3 9 A `� t N GRABBER CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY, INC.`' A MATT SUROWIECKI COMPANY DATE: 8/22/83 -- 20 GAUGE 5 PSF L/120 DEM. LIMIT L/240 DEM. LIMIT L/360 DEM. LIMIT STUD SPACING STUD SPACING STUD SPACING SECTION 121n 161n 241n 121n 161n 24in 121n 161n 241n 158 SS 12' 5" 11' 3" 9110" 9110" 8'11" 7110" 8' 7" 7110" 6110" 250 SS 17' 2" 15' 7" 13' 7" 13' 7" 12' 4" 10' 9" 11111" 10' 9" 9' 5" 350 SS 22' 4" 20' 4" 17' 9" 17' 9" 16' 1" 14' 1" 15' 6" 14' 1" 12' 3" 358 SS 23' ON 20'li" 18' 3" 18' 3" 16' 7" 14' 6" 15'11" 14' 6" 12' 8" 400 SS 24110" 22' 7" 19' 7" 19' 9"' 1711111 15' 8" ,11' 3" 15' 8" 13' 8" 600 SS 34' 5" 30'10":'25' 2" 27' 4" 24'10" 21' 8" 23'11" 21' 8" 18'11" * 800 SS 41' 3" 35' 8" "29'"2"- 34' 8" 31' 6" 27' 6" 30' 4" 27' 6" 24' O" 158 ST 10'10" 9' 4" 7' 8" 8'11" 8' 2" 7' 1" 7'10" 7' 1" 6' 2" 250 ST 14' 0" 12' 111 ' 911019 12' 5" l 1 ' 3" 911011 1011011 9110" 8' 7" 350 ST 18' 0" 15' 7" 12' 8" 16' 3" 14' 9" 12' 8" 14' 2" 12'11" 11' 3" 358 ST 18' 5" 16' 0" 13' 0" 16' 9" 15' 3" 13' 0" 14' 7" 13' 3" 11' 7" 400 ST 19'10" 17' 2" 14' 0" 18' 2" .16' 6" 14' 0" 15110" 14' 5" 12' 7" 600 ST • 27' 0" 23' 4" 19' 1 " 25' .5" 23' 2" 19' IN 22' 3" 20' 2" 17' 8" * 800. ST 33' 6" 29' 0" 23' 8" 32' 7" 29' 0" 23' 8" 28' 5" 25110" 22' 7" 250 WC 18' 4" 16' 8" 14' 7" 14' 7" 13' 3" 11' 7" 12' 9" 11' 7" 10' 1" 350 WC 23110" 21' 8" 18111" 18'11" .17' 2" 15' 0" 16' 6" 15' 0" 13' 1" 358 WC 24' 6" 22' 3" 19' 5" 19' S" IV 8" 15' S" 161110 15' 5" 13' 5" 400 WC 26' 5" 24' 0" 20' " 20'11" 19' 0" 16' 7" 18' 4" 16' 7" 14' 6" 600 WC. 36' 4" 33' O" 7' 3" 28'10" 26' 2" 22' 10" 25' 2" 22'10" 20' 0" * 800 WC 44' 2" 38' 3" 31 3" 36' 4" 33' 0" 28'10" 311 9" 28110" 25' 2" 250 WS 14' 0" 12' 1 " 9'11" 13' 6" 12' 1" 9111" 111 9" 10' 8" 9' 4" 350 WS 17' 8" 15' 4" 12' 6" 17' 6" 15' 4" 12' 6" 15' 4" 13111" 12' 2" 358 WS 18' IN 15' 8" 12410" 18' 0" 15' 8" 12'10" 15' 9" 14' 4" 12' 6" 400 WS 19' V 16' 10" 13' 9" 19' 5" 16'10" 13' 9" 17' 0" 15' 5" 13' 6" 600 WS 25'11" 22' 5" 18' 4" 25'11 " 22' 5" 18' 4" 23' 7" 211 5" 18' 4" * 800 WS 32' 2" 27'10" 22' 9" 32' 2" 27'10" 22' 9" 29'11" 27' 2" 22' 9" 0 NOTE: *The H/T exceeds 200, may require web stiffeners at bearing points 18 CITY OF TL'KWILA BUILDI14G DIVISION INVESTIGATION REPORT ADDRESS: DATE: C£-t/LESSEE: CN,%: g3- I V2 TOPIC: /- 2' . �r.f�A�-�-i�,r� �ii CC. PERMIT fl: ;9,6 J -j T 6 7- y P ; 4 e- .1'c:- -c7-,e o,v /a t- o P,6'ti e b /AP X02 A-r,�tra,J. • - QN .,v as r1-15 Q O GL l!/ lyGG L(J !} L.LJ21- * �/S�-/•d 2��1L�'d7Z��_. A yL/!�, .� e .✓ �-o l3T ?�i9-�-� .��-c�7oit� .BE' e P�,ri 6-� �'co i2E•NeIv _6 Q&�&-&-v6-D p? X6 ao !'2'*t; arc. X),�as u&7k-o-a w/j-& sf� A��y.. �A ",r G cs Tri A S w a -/j- _ �Cra' ; n� P/L6 AR•i.�-P� G�/1ll�.V.vZ" �Tfih�'T LtJ .�s yiOI%7�.11l''l� C40Lty) Cmw e- w.T 7 SZ *0 a ye-oo it /1 to 7'-o R 6160 me -V6 mrerm�.� • i r �. r � L r • L i. '' � � rG' � r i /I i ♦ i 1. - ' �i i 7" 7.2yop i SIGNED: PAS/) 6corH To 8E 'le� Gac..� tE fRo� a 50 /�MDuv�R Pk GcJ. u �e w,t.,q FIRk Carr , -�'q•- c/vCgfj0 AM�r9C �Lu��I �a�vE<2 . Plr9 '15 U Gig hP, Q too 7 5� 2-D �Amvr 4A7 'e- -<- GRi ' � 220Y {i � 2R o n�viN 3 pN </5 Pt;y3�� 3 t'.N , P4450 tl, 2 s (B.ti A W ► 3 Q H i zA / PH y5� i Ov - ,--r Con IPS AL r P C7-0 i' S m' ��—//5 ✓ //S V /5ti �-, s �FNc qVP«x /0'G i 2.3o v 4,,6A H, , 220 � y. ti A EJ(,? /z, SQ /i5v 2�✓ /Py /3A &,5 A �xZ 2201/ 22oV ►� ..�- e G 2 20 VA 9 7b� FvSf. D f�IPE �2 MAN -pone' - /Isv --- ? n� _ _ 'CITY OF TUKWI LA PERMIT NUMBER klq'TROL NUMBER .. 2 -- CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM T0; ❑BLDG,©PLNG, ❑ P. 14. ❑ FIRE ❑ POLICE ❑ P,& R. PROJECT ��,.�► ADDKESS�6d-!v (� _pZA±� ,rte-, DATE TRANSMITTED 10zlo RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED r PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE r BOX NEXT TO THE LINES) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED; 1)ikV VI-, n 1L ) use - st?A 0 Ntem-e- nF- 'R 1 m as 4) 7) nrzims k#3n c Kms. ( t,40 , 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) D,R,C, REVIEW REQUESTED El -.-Rl AN RESUBWT REQUESTED ,4 PLAN APPROVED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE ld - 10-8 T �.- COMMENTS PREPARED C,P,S, FORM 2 � :© y •/ , I / i �� _ �� .� CITY, OF TUKW I LA- C. ERMIT NUMBER- Ck. ROL NUMBER -- � CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG, PLNG., P, -W, FIREF]POLICEQ P,$ P. D D D C� PROJECT ,' Mf19L F J L) ,l�g ADDRESS 3 65 PLI.9NP )99- DATE-TRANSMITTED 99-DATE.TRANSMITTED 2- . RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C.P,S. STAFF COORDINATOR -RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND,WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING -THE BOVNEXT TO THE LINE(S) ON WHICH.THAT CONCERN IS NOTED: Maintain full sprinkler & hose -station coverage throughout. -Submit WSRB 1) approved drawings to the Tukwila Fire Dept. for approval prior to construction.. 2 ) 3) �.+. 4) �I 01 Provide fire extinguishers as follows: One extinguisher for each 3000 square feet k to be 2A-IOB:C dry chemical & k to be 2-k•Qallon pressurized waters. ""All EXIT'door markings & EXIT door hardware to comply strictly with UBC & UFC requirements. (No inside key -locks; no sliding dead -bolts). All electrical wiring is to be inspected by the State Electrical Inspector. Wiring in and on the spray booth is to be Class 1, Div. l. -.All wiring within 20 feet ot the spray booth is.to be Class 1j Div. : No spark or flame- produging items may be within -this -20 foot area. Insure that an adequate quantity of electrical, outlets and provided. Future ucn of axhancinn.rnrd-_ in lido of nprmanant wiring will 'NOT 'hp allnwPd. u» d 8) [� 10) . 12) . 13> - ❑ D, R, C, 'REVIEW REQUESTED El PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED -F)fl r,i ALl Aononkicn I I PLAN CHECK DATE _L�_2 _(R 3. COMMENTS PREPARED BY C,P,S, FORM 2 .'CITY OF TUKWILA PERMIT NUMBER kq'TROL NUMBER CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM - PLAN CHECK ROUTING FORM T0; R BLDG, ❑ PLNG,, ❑ P, W, M FIRE E POLICE ❑ P, & R. PROJECT ADDRESS DATE TRANSMITTED /o -io RESPONSE REQUESTED BY C,P,S, STAFF COORDINATOR RESPONSE RECEIVED PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED PROJECT PLANS AND RESPOND WITH APPROPRIATE COMMENTS IN THE SPACE BELOW, INDICATE CRUCIAL CONCERNS BY CHECKING THE BOX NEXT TO THE LINES) ON WHICH THAT CONCERN IS NOTED; Ej 1) cd j El 2) 1 aG%r o 1� �J .� qi , -- e 5-v MY, El 3) 0) 7 -5-we r; 4 m the o k, j,11 )570 5-5; )O�k-- ❑ 4) pr 0 bl -em 5 An ��- �' vim' `on s El 5).1 'Q Z15&— 2 57LOr44 '04 ❑ 6) 4e- ❑ 8) !/►r L art v / h ❑ 9)dozm 6 50-7 C, c o,, S C % %h 4he Q 11) ❑ 12) ❑ 13) Ej 14) [❑ 15) � ' D, R, C, REVIEW REQUESTED ❑ PLAN CHECK DATE 1-0 PLAN RESUBMITTAL REQUESTED COMMENTS PREPARED BY PLAN APPROVED '❑ � C,P,S, FORM 2 CITY OF TUKWI LA , 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PLAN CHECK CORRECTION LIST Job Address: 3 Control # 'p- Owner/Lessee: tr.� Permit #, Plan Checker: Date JD —1cy The following items shall be corrected, deleted, or added to the proposed construction plans: Resubmit after corrections have been made. Re -review of plans will be given priority, . 9 ..19 . .. . ... . _ : .. . I Control Number 3-�9�2 ..�:....:.,�,•. BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY of TU KW I LA ECU?VFD 6200SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD C('fY OF .TU 1: TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 433-1849 OCT 1983 SUILUING QE,r-,.. APPLICATION FOR PERMIT DATE 'TYPE CONST. 40� rj/ - JOB ADDRESS WA. LEGAL DESCR. LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT O U I IWOTIMLo PAW 14SEE ATTACHED SHEET OWNER AIC [p ADDRESS ADDRESS95' VPMWMO = (4• 97 s ZIP CONTRACTOR G J4. •0i fXj%FjV.d%VN . ' PHONE 167• IWO ADDRESS 07411* *1*4A%fff ` 0&U714 vlmrns WA ZIP 41608 LICENSE NOD* e0j _FW1w"4JIn 70 NO S ST N0. C w Z*&Idf BUILDING USE �.ypsuw Wo Afs TENANTAMjq%d FWIP FeWIN CLASS OF.WORK ;r.:'' • , ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION REMODEC•' ❑ REPAIR ❑ OTHER (Specify) FL. 2nd FL. BLDG.40FPLICANT, BASEMENT GARAGE DECK MEZZANINE ""r OF STORIES TOTAL S.F. VALUATION AREA Bldg...Div� (J COMMENTS: BP: NAME (PLEASE PRINT) �!' 't10M low ADDRESS , Z� 4y " r'�� w0do 19190' [PHONE e0Bz-1 ?AqO I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY ME IS TRUE AND CORRECT AQ THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. - :. • .. RE OF ATPLtCANT DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE . CMf11[F 'TYPE CONST. OCC. GROUP OCC. LOAD USE ZONE 4U70 SPRINKLERS REQ, F DETECTOR YES O NO [] YES [] NO PLAN RVW. ' PLANS: SENT RETURNED APPROVED FEE B ILDING QO Ste• d d DISTRIB. PL N RVW. , p O DEMOLITION BOND • OTHER TOTAL 119 40 0 _ _.. ... 'Amount Date Paid Receipt # FIRE DEPT. PLANNING/ SEPA PUBLIC WKS, Bldg...Div� (J COMMENTS: BP: PC: lolY18,-3 lo all Control Number APPLICATION FOR PERMIT BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY of TU KW I LA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 433-1849 n •. 1 iJ /1 a i.. :orf r-� OCT 1983 BUILUyivi, u �, DATE a► �7� JOB ADDRESS 124AC OCC. LOAD LEGAL DESCR. LOT NO. 07 BLOCK TRACT O 14 " IMPURMI; POM I 14SEE ATTACHED SHEET OWNER PHONE ADDRESS v� too QI0 ZIP V CONTRACTOR �N,� �/�r PHONE 0147- ��ta AQDRESS ���` '� %� W� ZIP igg5/D f LICENSE NO#n* 00j .F �jMwU� '_1v70 "o S ST NO. BUILDING USE r pmuwo "7M TENANTAMM .r Wt MWIN CLASS OF WORK ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION REMODEL ❑ REPAIR ❑ OTHER (Specify) BLDG. 1st FL. 2nd FL. BASEMENT GARAGE DECK MEZZANINE it OF STORES TOTAL S.F. VALUATION AREA a&&AMC �� �� �s ■ BP:I ov ! 7 NAME OF AIPPLICANT (PLEASE PRINT) 4/� MW ADDRESS � WA0 jO, PHONE&gjZM Z o I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY ME IS TRUE AND CORRECT THAT THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TUKWILA REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET. d Poll RE OF PLICANT 91 DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE CKAAVc TYPE CONST. OCC. GRO OCC. LOAD USE ZONE k tjUTDSPRINKLERS REQ,I DETECTOR W .� YES ❑ No [] YES [] NO PLAN RVW. PLANS: SENT RETURNED APPROVED FEE B ILDING CD S`• V d DISTRIS. PLAN RVW. O DEMOLITION BOND OTHER 70TAL Amount Date Paid Receipt #i FIRE DEPT. PLANNING/ SEPA PUBLIC WKS. Bid,.. Div Gl COMMENTS: BP:I ov ! 7 PC: ,OD