Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit 4648 - S P Richards - Restroom and Loading Dock Enclosure
CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 Work to be done Site Address 1100 Andover Pk W. Suite # Tenant S.P. RICHARDS Building Use Office / Warehouse Assessors Account # 352 3n4- 4n53 -0 Property Owner C Y Enterprises (Howard Wong) Phone # (604) 685 -8264 Address 227 E. Georgia St. Vancouver B.C. Canada Zip V6A U 6 Contractor Evergreen State Const. Phone # 255 -0400 Address 200 S.W. 16th Renton WA 1 Zip 98055 T.I. BUILDING PERMIT PERMIT # 'a c( v Control # 87 -050 (513) FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY S Ft. Sq. lst —FT. 2nd FT- Office St/ Warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load 3rd Fl. Total Fire Protection: [[ Sprinklers J Detectors Zoning Type of Construction Special Conditions Fees sq. ft. @ 1st F1. $ sq. ft. @ 2nd Fl. $ sq. ft. @ other $ sq. ft. @ other $ Total Valuation of Construction $ 38,000 Bldg. Permit Fee Plan Check Fee Demolition Surcharges Other Other TOTAL Receipt #6.2n9 $ 337.00 Receipt # $ 219.00 Receipt # $ Receipt # $ Receipt # $ Receipt # $ 1,50 337.00 $ 894.50 FOR SIGN PERMIT ONLY 0 Permanent [1 Temporary [[ Single Face [] Double Face [] Wall Mounted Building face [] Free Standing [] Other Setbacks: Front Side Square Footage of each sign face Special Conditions Side Rear Total square footage of sign THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDUNEO FUR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. 1 HEREBY CE IF THAT I HAVE AD AND EXAMINED TH1 APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS ANU ORDINANCES GOVERNING HIS YPE OF WORK '1 L BE COMPLIED WITH ETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE 1R CEL Lf(E P•s ISIONS OF ANY • HER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR E p.(FORMANC 1STRUCTION. Signed (% V Date (—rill_ el t / — — 1 hereby affirm that 1 Contractor (signature) LICENSED CO TRACTORS DECLARATION ed und 'sions of the Busi ss and Professions Code, a d�jY'yli�/cense its ''n ful3force Date__e1�i 1���!'v' �;J/ 0'"- BUILDER .DECLARATION ( ) 1, as owner of the property, or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale. ( ) 1, as owner of the Owner (signature) property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Date °•r ,.:r-.- �{.;,i �.. "''', _�T"' ;'.'�� sr,-r, r�i'v �wwr+,' Ft' i'wsr�ra- rt�r•-.ra-'{c,,— ^'.Y�; �i..r.r-cMxc�w , T, r�r�-.-^ r°:,... r,.._ „f,......_-- •— .._...- ..,..,.... rrr n- .....,. CITY OF TUKWILA :.;''`r* Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1845 BUILDING PERMIT Work to be.done .\ T.I. Site Address 11.00 Andover Pk W./ Suite # Tenant S.P. RICHARDS Building Use Office I Warehouse Assessors Account # 352 304 - 4053 -0 Property Owner t Y Enterprises (Howard Wong) Phone # (604) 685 -8264 Address 227 E. Georgia St. Vancouver B.C. Canada Zip V6A174 Contractor Evergreen State Const. .- Phone # 255 -0400 Address 200 S.W. 16th Renton PERMIT #, _-/ k" Control # 87 -050 (513) WA FOR BUILDING PERMIT ONLY nnrrfvPd far Tcc anrn Sq. • S Ft. Office Storage/ Warehouse Retail Other Occ. Load istFT. 2nd F1. 3rd Fl. Total Fire Protection: ❑ Sprinklers 1=I Detectors �'Zoriiilg'” ' Type of Construction 98055 / Fees sq. ft. @ 1st F1. $ sq. ft. @ 2nd Fl. $ sq. ft. @ other $ sq. ft. @ other $ Total Valuation of Construction $ 38,000 Bldg. Permit Fee Receipt # 6,aat, $ 337.00 Plan Check Fee Receipt # $ 219.00 Demolition Receipt # $ Surcharges Receipt # $ 1.50 Other Receipt # $ 337.00 Other Receipt # $ TOTAL Special Conditions FUR SIGN PERMIT ONLY ❑ Permanent ❑ Temporary ❑ Single Face ❑ Double Face ❑ Wall Mounted ['Free Standing E] Other Building face Setbacks: Front Side Side Rear Square Footage of each sign face Total square footage of sign Special Conditions THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL ANU VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FUR A jPERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIF THAT 1 HAVE AD AND EXAMINED THI APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING T HIS,/TYPE OF WPRK 1 L BE COMPLIED WITH ETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TU GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE ,OR/CfOjCEL T E P'' ISIONS OF ANY HER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR HE P.E$1FORMAANcCf�. 91STRUCT1ON. Date '-''9 Y'7 ait -LW'` 5.1 / L i LICENSED C0 RACTORS DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I 09 ed und: p•• sions of the Bus / ss and Professions Code, a d license is n fujfo rcee t. Contractor (signature) Date I1�,��` ! 0 RE or my employees, with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or Signed__ ( ) 1, as owner of the property, offered for sale. ( ) 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractor's to construct the project. Owner (signature) Date X -RAY, INC. 7500 PERIMETER ROAD SOUTH BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98108 AREA 206 7634919 INV. NO. REPORT NO. 7475 DATE 3 -17 -87 CUSTOMER Pacord P. 0. PART NO. (Or Description) S .P. Richards Building RADIOGRAPHY MAGNETIC PARTICLE J LIQUID PENETRANT MAT'L Fe ULTRASONIC 0 CONTRACT NO. OTHER Visual Dwg. NAPA Distribution Center CLASS QUANTITY Spot Visual Inspection of Welding Inspection Results: Discrepancies Repaired. Inspected Welding Acceptable SUMMARY NO, PARTS NO, REJECTED NO. APPROVED NO. OF FILM SIZE AND QUANTITY VIEWS 41/2x17 7x17 70MM 8x10 10x12 14x17 PREPARED BY E.C. Reese Level II APPROVED BY e.d,' ACCEPTED BY NOTE; This report Is unb ased. We assume no responsibility for losses of any kind due to our interpretation of the quality of the material submitted All data (Inc information will be held strictly confidential. FORM 102.72 CITY OF TUKWILA .Building Division f2OO Southcentor Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection Site Address Requestor 1 (On A b1 J4 j ,, ID lc (.1.J ma. INSPEC( ON RECORD PERMIT # /,j Date Date Wanted F3 -,?-0-Fr" ? a.m. p.m. Project S' t Phone # B144. Special Instructions Inspection Results /Comme s: Inspector Date 'clprVY7 CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard TLkwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection /14/' Vo'i / Site Address //DD Requestor Special Instructions INSPECT' 1N RECORD PERMIT # 54' Date 3/ ?f'7 Date Wanted ..3M/87 Project S, `' /f d'-a S Phone # Inspection Results /Comments: l 4.1-.A. 4 el.?:+e /,'Leele /4-7A7 Inspector §-n44/ Date ...� / /0�� CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division Southcentr (206) 433 -1849 INSPECT '.ON RECORD PERMIT # 469c9 Date 1/107 7'4/o ,0, Type of Inspection .46/// ,,�� Date Wanted 3/�� 7 a.m. 67.. Site Address /p0 /91-t 4oat°� /o' - !l/ .es-' Project 5', /e /'�`Jd.�S 3,`at) Requestor Phone # Special Instructions Inspection Results /Comments: Inspector %V411:1.71 8td.y7 Date `?/9/V7 re.r.uw.. + w.-.,...,......,+.. a ..w.».......,x,.......n..,u..,w ».xories. erg.: n».. u_. wnr, s r•.tw,u- se..e+suw.. ,"c�.n.v,ra.,..k�...o.w,«wnw» Maur. wv wnu �. +ua,rwn,xur;:,.:, mme »w,^ a...s.,�w.n.;± •!uGCa hlt!•1'rMftVISkRt W,f.tk CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division Tukwila,tWashington Boulevard 8188 (206) 433 -1849 Type of Inspection r�c3//i/<2i Site Address //00 ,S%r pa9v /44 4.4 Requestor Special Instructions INSPECrON RECORD PERMIT # 'g Date 3,4/2'7 7: c/o /Ai* Date Wanted 33f0j Project S, X k- & Phone # • Inspection Results /Comments: "Ad - /e Date 5/j4'7 • CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard TLkwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 INSPEC{ ON RECORD 'PERMIT # 1/61-1 lJ Date 3/C/77 Type of Inspection -YCu)rn `I �� 4/1'; /r%/ Date Wanted e Site Address O 6 r %� �21L at/ .p y gyi4 k) Project ST / rc 4 ct Ye-i7 5' Requestor j?7,4--2..- ! Phone # Special Instructions /',()0c.olc/ 4 0 /2l�1&c flea, -1 (,Uduf // /Q/)% Inspection Results /Comments: CW j col 'V' Lt( 0 k 4 .�1_i1.4 r. uv , WO 11 cm soJe4) /5�r WWct 0 Q 0 C .. ,]ll.. A .r • +• Ito 4 ,4 • ,L fl Lead . cl-t • ._ n c •• . t! - -f C-12) - ,e . ykor c NJoL1 ('c r, tabet (1)c II 0 °cry Inspector Date 3/6/7 7 1YpbfAtW AV149:trt1:11,9i/N! /01.1011 V] ftgtuu F.,..01,11ke"ii.W.:(.*1•11 ; iV 1414,114', T41N..:at ii =a�: r,N :KVM'ti.�:.ev:fN:�Tn4hL:P CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division Washington Boulevard (206) 433 -1849 INSPEC'ON RECORD PERMIT # 6e Date :-.0f %$�% Type of Inspection " y' Date Wanted 3 6177 Site Address / i (i,ot,e. <T le we - P roject _ , //,? ) Requestor Phone # ,;2.5-S--675/00 Special Instructions 7i�.f tti k::dii ,r}1!�iYS ti Inspection Results /Comments: / - 1 4 4 1 / 1 ei.y '/oir -ri f)L// c?1 (2.74 CI' 0 t Inspector ;Gc 0 Date cA/e% CITY OF TUKWILA Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 INSPEC'JN RECORD PERMIT # Ll6 YY Date 3 r3 —ts'� Type of Inspection -� mil- Site Address Requestor Special Instructions / /bo Pt Date Wanted &)o) 3- y 87 Project S ( �e_eitot...eL -1 .sue Phone # z5s� o �/oc7 a.m. Inspection Results Comments: t .,r n r 6,, l!/li .f Inspector Date '344 7 stop work CITY OF TU%%WILA . Building Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 INSPEC -( '3N RECORD PERMIT # Date (2 / /0% Type of Inspection Date Wanted a.m. Site Address / /&' ihJ /1-c- j4.4 5e% Project S g /6.e,A.arals Requestor Phone # Special Instructions p•m• Inspection Results /Comments: 7-4)440 - te,,:G[et 1./A14,64-ge-e- ac)relgm✓ g L- i Inspector Date i•"i;.' .::s�t:'.�t'r.!:7:.rNj, "• .a''I:'�;i•`h'SSf'J,i ..,i.' '.+ CITY OF 1UKWILA Central Permit System "1:4 11 1) dal No. Permit No. FINAL APPROVAL FORM TO: El Building El Planning El Public Works IE Fire Dept. El Police El Parks/Recreation Project Name ;';. Address // Type of Permit(s) is / This project is nearing completion. Please investigate your area of responsibility and indicate below either your final approval or necessary corrections. If no response is received within one week, it will be assumed that the project is of no concern to your department and a certificate of occupancy may be issued. This project is NOT approved by this department; the following corrections are necessary: ) i aii , .. .•' (-?� �. ate' 'S C. , ..,.' ( ) () /. f f i ) s, - - ,:i •.1 /:• e:r, �e/ '(' .:a , � /4 r" /. r. c' ' % (1 ( ) / y1 / ' - . • , ) / A f ' ' ( ) ` ' , ) f (c) ( ) ( ) / 57 3 Authorized Signature t Date This project is approved by this department: Authorized Signature J v. /•7 /2 -7i,- c/ 2 Date CPS Form r Evergreen State Construction, Inc. Date: April 10, 1987 To: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attn: Duane Griffin Re: S.P. Richards 1100 Andover Park West Tukwila, Washington 98188 TRANSMITTAL PMEnt APR 13 1987 Cfl Enclosed herewith please find one (1) copies of the following: Sheet A -1: Site Plan; Legal Description; Vicinity Map; Project Data; Details A, B & C and Roll -up Door Elevations; dated 2/2/87 as revised 3/5/87. Sheet A -2: Floor Plan; Electrical Plan; Legends; Details 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6; dated 1/26/87 as revised 3/5/87. This material is sent for your approval XXX This material is sent for your information This material is approved as submitted This material is approved as noted This material is not approved Please correct and resubmit Please review and return EVERGREEN STATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 'Contractors #E I'232DC By Ray Yo 200 S.W. 16t / P.O. Box 630 as requested. corrected or approved copies enton, Washington 98057 / (206) 255 -0400 City of Tukwila Fire Department Gary VanDusen Mayor Hubert H. Crawley Fire Chief Fire Department Review Control Number 87 -050 February 20, 1987 Re: S.P. Richards Company - 1100 Andover Park West Dear Sir: The attached set of building plans have been reviewed by The Fire Prevention Bureau and are acceptable with the following concerns: 1. The total number of fire extinguishers required for your establishment is calculated at one extinguisher for each 3000 sq. ft. of area. The extinguisher(s) should be of the "All Purpose" (2A, 10 B:C) dry chemical type. Travel distance to any fire extinguisher must be 75' or less. (NFPA 10, 3 -1.1 and UFC 10.301b) Extinguishers shall be installed on the hangers or in the brackets supplied, mounted in cabinets, or set on shelves (NFPA 10, 1 -6.6), and shall be installed so that the top of the extinguisher is not more than 5 ft. above the floor. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.9) Extinguishers shall be located so as to be in plain view (if at all possible), or if not in plain view, they shall be identified with a sign stating, "Fire Extinguisher ", with an arrow pointing to the unit. (NFPA 10, 1 -6.3) 2. Exit hardware and marking must meet the requirements of Uniform Fire Code Sections 12.104 & 12.114. Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. (UFC 12.104b) 3. Hose stations are required. (Plans must be submitted to the Fire Marshal for approval prior to installation.) (City Ordinance #1141) 4. Maintain sprinkler protection for all enclosed areas. (NFPA 13, 4- 1.1.1) (Including under mezzanine per Washington Survey and Rating Bureau & N.F.P.A. 13 standards) Gty of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 City of Tukwila Fire Department Page number Gary VanDusen Mayor Hubert H. Crawley 2 Fire Chief All modifications to sprinkler systems shall have the written approval of the Washington Surveying & Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual Engineering or Industrial Risk Insurers, then by the Tukwila Fire Department. No sprinkler work shall commence without approved drawings. (City Ordinance #1141 & NFPA 13, 1 -9.1) 5. Local UL Central Station Supervision is required per (UFC 10.309) 6. All electrical wiring is to be inspected by the State Electrical Inspector, Washington State Department of Labor & Industries. 7. Your street address must be conspicuously posted on the building and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street. Numbers shall contrast with their background. (UFC 10.208) 8. If the building is to be used for the storage of high -piled combustible material (as defined in UFC, Sec. 9.110); automatic fire - extinguishing systems, smoke - removal systems, fire protection and fire separations are required per Uniform Fire Code - Article 81. 9. All interior wall covering materials shall be fire - resistive or shall be treated to be fire - resistive, so as to result in a flame- spread rating as required by UFC Appendix VI -C tables 42A and 42B. A certificate of the flame spread rating is required to be delivered to the Tukwila Fire Department. (UBC 4204) Yours truly, The Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau co: T.F.D. File nod City of Tukwila Fire Department, 444 Andover Park East, Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 575 -4404 Phenolic Insulation Dear Jim: Koppers Company, Inc. 436 Seventh Avenue, Pittsburgh, P Telephone 412 - 227.2000 KOPPERS February 26, 1987 !19 A(7-'4-1-)/--A----z-4--' 1@lian10 FEB 87 1967 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. Mr. Jim Norman Evergreen State Construction P. 0. Box 630 200 Southwest 16th Renton, WA 98055 Subject: S. P. Richards Renovation 1100 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA Per our telephone conversations, I.am forwarding to you all of the pertinent data available on the Rx insulation as is installed on the walls on the above referenced project. You will note that this product is classified as the Koppers Rx A11- Purpose Roofboard, and I have included all of the pertinent data and product literature so that you may refer to it when talking about the Rx insulation that is currently installed. In addition, I have attached a copy of the material that was tested at both UL and FM for the full -scale ceiling corner test, and the small room test to be used as an exposed interior application. This product is exactly the same as the all- purpose roofboard from a foam core standpoint and glass facers. The only exception is that the exposed interior product tested at UL and FM had a 1 mil foil laminated to the interior exposed face. By looking at the test results from both UL and FM, you will note that the flame and smoke properties of the Rx A11- Purpose Roofboard currently installed in the building, compare very well to the Rx Plus product that was tested at UL and FM with the foil facing on one side. I have noted these numbers on the test results. It is the interpretation of the Koppers Company that the Rx All - Purpose Roofboard, that which is currently installed in the project as mentioned, is adequate both from a durability and functional standpoint, and also offers all of the flame and smoke Mr. Jim Norman February 26, 1987 Page 2 FEB 27 1987, cisal EV S GthEEN STATE CO $T. INC. properties of the product that was put through the UL and FM fire testing. Although the all- purpose roofboard is sold into commercial roofing areas, it still carries the same foam core and, in this case, I feel that the flame and smoke properties speak for themselves and provide you with the necessary safety factors to be installed in an interior exposed application. You will note that those products which currently carry the ICBO fire test approval and the UL and FM classifications for both the small room test and full -scale ceiling corner test carry flame and smoke numbers, i.e., flame spread of 25 or leas and smoke developed of 170 to 200. As you can see, this is well in excess of what the Koppers product offers for this same application. We ask that you consider this information for an interpretation of the Building Code to allow the application to stay as it has been installed by the Evergreen Construction Company. Should you have any further questions or need additional data concerning the submittals that Koppers has provided for the Rx A11- Purpose Roofboard, please call me to discuss at your earliest possible convenience. Very truly yours, T. A. Rowe, Jr. Marketing Manager Insulation Products TAR /jls Enclosures cc: Ed Kornahnes Evergreen State Construction Dwayne Griffin City of Tukwila c/o Evergreen State Construction y Koppers Company, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 KOPPERS Architectural and Construction Materials 0M•833 April '85 nc. , PHENOLIC FOAM INSULATION Health & Safety Issues FEB 87 1987 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. KOPPERS } PHENOLIC FOAM INSULATION Health & Safety Issues Phenolic resins have been used for over 50 years in such diverse products as adhesives primarily for exterior plywood and structural particle board, plastic moldings and components of aerospace vehicles', to mention only a few. More recently in the United States new tech- nology in foaming phenolic resins has led to the production of rigid board insulation for roofs and residential sidewall sheathing. Kop- pers Company, Inc. has been one of the leaders in this new technology and its product Rx In- sulation is one of these phenolic foam insula- tions. What Research Findings Reveal Koppers Rx Insulation has not only exhibited excellent thermal values, low flame spread, low smoke development ratings.and high dimen- sional stability, but it has also been tested for toxicity, mutagenicity and combustion product toxicity. It has been shown to have a very lim- ited potential for adverse health effects. Rx Insulation has demonstrated no short term health effects except for the dust generated during cutting of the board which may cause eye irritation. Based on acute toxicity tests done according to protocols developed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission In the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), a Powder made from the board resin is Tess than toxic (FHSA definition) by Ingestion or skin penetration and does not cause skin irritation. The powder from the board resin also gave negative results in the bacterial mutagenicity assay, the Ames test, i.e. no genetic effects were observed in this test. Under flaming and non - flaming conditions, this insulation is "no more toxic than wood" (Douglas fir - standard) based on the results of a combustion toxicity test developed by the National Bureau of Standards, No Adverse Health Effects Phenolic resins are made by chemically react- ing phenol and formaldehyde. When these resins are cured, the formaldehyde in them is tightly bound to the phenol forming very stable chemical bonds. Phenol formaldehyde resins, unlike urea- formaldehyde resins, are very resistant to hydrolysis, i.e. they do not break down (decompose) in the presence of water3. Also, the closed -cell nature of foam in Rx Insulation helps to slow the release rate of the very small amount of residual free for- maldehyde (not bound to phenol) ( <0.1%) pres- ent in this cured resin. Extensive formaldehyde emission testing has been done on this insula- tion by Koppers Company, Inc. and outside laboratories over extended periods of time. The results have shown very low formaldehyde emissions which indicate a worst case level of 0.05 ppm in ambient air of typical work or living spaces. A review of the scientific literature by the Formaldehyde Institute suggests that most individuals do not have irritation from formaldehyde until the air concentration is greater than 1 or 2 ppm. Only a very small proportion of the total population who are ex- tremely sensitive to various materials will have sensory irritation or other symptoms from for- maldehyde at concentrations of 0.5 ppm or less. The emissions from our insulation are one tenth of that amount. Therefore, no adverse health effects are anticipated from Rx Insula- tion. More Information Available More information on Rx Insulation and /or the health effects of formaldehyde and copies of references mentioned in this pamphlet can be obtained from: Koppers Company, Inc., Chemi- cal & Allied Products, 724 Koppers Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. We are confident that this product will give you excellent insulating properties without any undue risk to your health. We welcome any questions you have. 'Blomqulsl, R. F., 1981, Formaldehyde Emissions Are No Problem with Wood Products Bonded with Phenolic Ruins, American Plywood Association. "Phenolic Foam: Insulation of the Future?" In Roofing /Siding /insulation, October, 18N2. 'National Research Council, 1881, Formaldehyde and other Aldehydes. National Academy Press, pp. 33, 81. OM 636 Null 66 Koppers Company, Inc. 1901 Koppers Bldg. Pittsburgh, PA 15219 1-800-558-2706 KOPPERS Architectural and Construction Materials 1 7 1St OEUL oam Insulation What is it? Why is it so effective? How does it compare with other insulations? KOPPE RS Insulation Products Thermal Insulation Performance w a Y ti .4 2 0 • Phenolic Foam: Questions and Answers G. What is Rx phenolic foam insulation? A. Rx phenolic foam is a closed -cell, rigid foam board insulation made with phenolic resin. 0. What makes it so revolutionary? A. Rx Insulation has the highest R value per thickness of any insulation material available. In addition, Rx Insulation also offers excellent retention of its original thermal value. 0. What about thermal values of other types of insulation; for example, isocyanurates and urethanes? A. Their cell walls are susceptible to the release of fluorocarbon gases...which means that the initial insulating values will deteriorate over time. Industry tests confirm this. 0. What is an "R" value? A. R values measure resistance to heat flow. The greater the R value, the more resistance to heat loss. R values are determined by tests performed under methods designed by the American Society of Testing Materials. (ASTM). KOPPERS ES; "Most R' per inch" G. How does Rx insula- tion's R value compare to others over a specific period of time? A. Most foam insulations are approximately the same at the time of manufacture. How- ever, after six months, there is a significant difference. Rx Insula- tion maintains its insulating value while others may lose as much as 30%, depend- ing on the facer. This difference may be even greater over longer periods of time 0. What does this mean to the buyer? A. It means that many foam insulations may actually lose part of their insulation value over time. To put it another way, the insulation you pay for today may not be as good tomorrow. Koppers Rx Insulation is an exception. u u aminias 0,1410* f Rs InsuIMion R=a.3Mch ■ Unitha wtwcyarwrM. R=7.Yllnch Impermeable Facers Urothaneilsocyanutale RR_ Permeable Facers For data to substantiate aged R value. contact t(o�rs company. Inc.. Pittsbburph, PppA. ..11.. For data on Urethane/ tsocyanurale see manutac- turerdtaerature. Rx is a registered trademark ot Koppers Company. Inc 0. How does Rx Insulation compare with other foam insulations with regard to surface burning characteristics? A. Phenolic foam insulation has low flame spread and low smoke development ratings as deter- mined in ASTM test method E 84...superior to most other foams. 0. What about toxicity? A. Koppers Insulation has undergone extensive health and safety testing under flaming and non -flaming test conditions. The results of the tests showed that, when properly applied, Rx Insulation does not present any significant risks. 0. Does any company besides Koppers manufacture a closed -cell phenolic foam insulation? A. Because this unique process was developed and perfected by Koppers research labora- tories, it is a patented process...and cannot be used by anyone else. 0. Because Koppers Rx Insulation is obviously superior to other foam insulations in both R value and surface burning characteristics, isn't it more expensive? A. On the contrary, it's competitively priced. Why settle for less? Note: Thermal values of Ax Insulation were determined in accordance with ASTM C 518. Consult Koppers literature for recommended testing procedure. 07220/KOP Buy Line 2281 Koppers APUkPbSE ticiothoard Insulation This extraordinary cost - effective insulation provides the most "R" per inch of any product on the marke.t.- ..a944fre.guarantee it. It also has the best fire performance characte'ri"stics ymX can buy. For the first time ever, a foam plastic insulation is guaranteed to retain its "R" value for 20 years. Our 8.3 "aged" "R" value per inch is the best in the industry...and Koppers Rx Insulation will retain its "R" value into the next century. We guarantee it. Koppers Rx is a rigid, thermally effi- cient phenolic foam board insulation that provides superior long-lasting energy efficiency. It is the best value in roofing, insulation today.... tomorrow... and into the 21st century. Koppers guarantees it! The Koppers Guarantee If the "R" value of Koppers Rx insulation fails to meet our published specifica- tions- anytime within 20 years of instal- lation- Koppers will pay the difference in heating and cooling costs! See war- ranty for details. Are you and your customers getting the Tong -term "R" value you expected? The Roof Insulation Committee of the Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association requires only a 6 -month evaluation period for determining the standards for "aged" "R" values of foam plastic insulations. Koppers Rx Insulation goes much further, guaran- teeing its high in- service "R" value for 20 years! Koppers Rx All - Purpose Insulation is also dimensionally stable, has low flame spread and low smoke developed ratings as determined in ASTM test method E 84. Rx All-Purpose Insulation is available with fiberglass facers on both sides for built -up and all single -ply roofing systems. The dimensional stability of Rx Insula- tion exceeds the industry standard as published by the Thermal Insulation Manufacturers Association (TIMA). The best news of all about Koppers Rx All- Purpose Insulation is that all these benefits are available at a cost - effective price. Compare! You'll find that Koppers Rx All - Purpose Roofboard Insulation offers more benefits: • Most aged R value per inch...Guar- anteed! • Low smoke developed rating • Low flame spread rating • Good dimensional stability • Cost effective Thermal Insulation' Performance ("Aged " *. Thermal.Value) 4* Value Value 8,3 10.0 12.5 14.6 16.7 20.0 25.5 30.0 0.1200 0.1000 0.0800 0.0686 0.0600 0.0500 0.0400 0.0333 Rx Insulation Nominal Thickness (Inches) 1.0' *• 1.2 1.5 1.75 2.0 2.4 3.0 3.6 Approx. weight /Ibs. per sq. ft. .288 .338 .413 .476 .538 .638 .788 .938 • Flute spanabllity (Inches) monolithic surface only 2% 2s /a 2% 3% 3% 33/6 3% . ': The thermal value was- determined by ASTM C.518: All test specimens•were,conditioned Iin.: accordance withsRIC/TIMA,Bulletin 281 -1. Rx Insulation thermal calculations are based on a•`.'. "IC value of 0:12. See typical properties for tolerances. ,IRIC/TIMA aging method•has established a criteria described in their bulletin 281- 1.which sets the appropriate conditions at 75 °F and 50% RH for 180 days. Koppers reports thermal values:;1 based on these conditions;; however, unlike othermaterials, Rx Insulation is unchanged by this?.; :process from time of manufacture to the 180 daylimit. Additional testing:shows that Rx- 'hot lose its insulation value over time.. - .r ' a:, • , . "For flute spans groater than 31/4 inches special provisions may be necessary..Far specific;`;' ia" • information consult your Koppers representative... °? r ".. "1" product not Factory, Mutual rated. When designing a building, specifiers are more concerned with energy conser- vation considerations and how insula- tion can affect the total cost of a building through its projected life. Rx Insulation is the most thermally efficient insulation on the market today based on its aged R value per inch. When you specify Rx Insulation you get 2 additional benefits from its exceptional R value per inch -from reduced heating/ air conditioning equipment requirements, reduction in energy consumption, and savings in perimeter nailer thickness. Rx Insulation's low flame spread and smoke developed ratings could poten- tially result in lower insurance costs for your building. Typical Physical Properties* [TEST METHOD] Compressive strength 10% consolidation, psi (ASTM D 1621 -731 25 Dimensional stability < 1.0 (length) (7 days 158 °F /95% R.H.),% < 1.0 (width) (ASTM D 2126-751 < 1,0 (thickness) Thermal conductivity " ( "k" value) (ASTM C 518 -761 0.12 Water absorption, increase by volume (two hour immersion),% (ASTM C 272.531 Water Vapor Transmission, Perms (ASTM E 96.80 A & 81 Desiccant Method Water Method Density, Ib / /ft3 (nominal) (ASTM 0 1622.631 Coefficient of linear thermal expansion, per °F (ASTM D 696 -791 1.8 1.4 7.0 2.5 13x10.6 Surface burning characteristics (1/2" to 3" thickness bare foam) (ASTM E 84.811A * ** Flame spread Smoke developed 25 or less 25 or less The physical properties listed above are presented as typical average Foam Core values as determined by accepted ASTM lest methods and are subject to normal manufacturing variation. This data is offered as a service to our customers and is subject to change. All information can be confirmed by contacting Koppers Company, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA. "Government regulations (FTC Regula- tions, 16CFR Part 460, Volume 44, Number 167, August 27, 1979) and industry prac- tice accept deviations in thermal (R) value of up to 10% as satisfying a represented R value. Variations in testing equipment and procedures as well as other factors can result in variations of up to 10% from the actual R value of any sample. "'The numerical ratings as determined by ASTM Test Method E 84 are not intended to reflect hazards presented by this or any other material under actual fire conditions. la1"114 FE8 271W EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. • Koppers Rx Insulation achieves UL.263 one, Product Compliance one - and -a -half, and two -hour fire resistive rating 07220/KOP BuyLine 2281 The UL 263 test exposes the underside of the roof assembly to fire. This is the only plastic foam insulation that can be applied directly over a metal deck and achieve a one, one - and -a -half, or two - hour fire resistive rating. During this vig- orous test, the temperature beneath the deck reached 1850 °F, yet the tempera- ture above the deck rose less than 25° to a high of approximately 92° at the end of the test. Rx Insulation Is the efficient insulation for fire resistive construction. Typical roof configurations UL Design No. P -715 Roofing membrane —Coal tar or asphalt BUR or single ply membrane see UL building materials directory: Roof covering materials TFJR Sheathing materials CHIZ. Steel beam w6x16 (minimum size) Bar joist 10H4 open web (minimum size) Cementitious Fireproofing Steel deck 22 gauge W Perlite or Y" Wood fiberboard Koppers Rx All-Purpose Roof Insulation 2.4" thick UL Design No. P -225 Rx Roofboard Insulation is also approved by UL for use In design No. P -225 one and one - and -a -half hour fire resistance roof and dropped acoustical ceiling assembly. The lire resistive rating as determined by UL lost procedure 283 Is not Intended to reflect hazards presented by this or any other material under actual lire conditions. Rx Roof Insulation meets the following requirements: FM Approvals: Class I Insulated Steel Roof Deck Construction with both 1.60 and 1 -90 Windstorm Classifications. Re- fer to the FM approval guide for details. U.L. Classifications: (1) One, one - and -a -half, and two -hour Fire - Resistance -Rated Roof Assembly. P-715 and one and one - and -a -half hour P -225 fire resistance roof and dropped acoustical ceiling assembly. (2) Insulated Metal Deck Construction Assemblies. Construction Numbers 1, 2, 120 and 123. (3) UL Class A Roofing Covering with Coal Tar Built -Up Roof. (4) UL Class A with Asphalt Built -Up Roof. (5) ULC Class A with Built -Up Roof. Federal Specification: Rx Insulation is a phenolic foam insulation board with physical properties which meet or exceed performance criteria in Federal Specifi- cation HH -I -1972. Uniform Building Code: IC8O Evalua- tion Report #4086, Koppers Rx Foam Roof Board Insulation. Must be installed in accordance with Koppers Instructions and Section 1712, Foam Plastic Insula- tion of the 1985 UBC Code. BOCA Building Code: Research Report #84 -67. Rx Roof Insulation must be installed in accordance with Koppers Company recommendations and must be installed in accordance with Section 1317 BOCA Basic National Building Code -1984 Edition (as amended, 1985 Supplement). Standard Building Code: SBCCI- Compliance Report #8506 Rx Roof Insulation may be used for roof insula- tion when installed in accordance with Koppers recommendations. Rx Roof Insulation must be installed In compli- ance with Section 706 (Roof Coverings) and Section 717 (Foam Plastics) of the Standard Building Code. .IMAt I I;,i■1 lItt Iii Al a ltd Approved UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. LISTED 3 Application Data The thermally efficient roof insulation General Description Rx All - Purpose Insulation is a thermally efficient roof insulation consisting of fiber glass facers integrally laminated to both sides of a closed cell phenolic foam. Compared to other types of polymer foams used In roofing systems, Rx Insu- lation demonstrates superior physical characteristics, thermal insulation value, low flame spread rating and low smoke developed. This product can be used with built-up and single -ply roofing systems. The following information is provided to specifiers and purchasers in order to assist them in utilizing this product in a proved and recommended manner. If additional information is required or special assistance is necessary, contact Koppers Company, Inc. 4 Typical Rx Insulation Application This chart is offered as a reference guide to alternate methods of proper applica- tion for Rx Roof Insulation. For specific lCtt± '+ ',t; 7` L ek f'1 , - " Coo :,z, i,,,,:,'447-7,,,,,,,-:, ,Asphs ,.. pt ;;;. A99ngat i„Aggngats Recommendations detailed the Insulation manual. �^�1�..., Smoot Sur* r� installation Application (See note �` 1�" ,, Moditlsd` i8ltuinsns procedures, section below). ��.t'�i�.x'Kx• j ,.''Fully. :'Adhered , consult of this I,.tif. \ �i 2.{. ,a: Sdinl-�:1 {Attachid Metal i 1 3 td 3d tb to 3e lb 1 Concrete 1 1d 2 3d 3 lb 3b le 3e 1b 3b 1 3 Gypsum 3a 3ad 3ab 3ae 3ab 3a Wood 1 1d Plank/ Plywood 3a 3ad 1b le 3ae 1b 1 Structural 1 1d 1b Wood Fiber 3c 3cd 3ab le 3ae 1b 3ab 1 i 3a NOTE: These recommendations apply to the installations of Rx Insulation as described above. It is also recommended that the specifier consult the membrane manufac- turer's literature and specifications. •Asphalt smooth surface roofing systems can be top coated with an asphalt coat- ing, aluminum coating or cap sheet. Methods of Insulation Attachment: (See chart above) 1. Mechanical Fasteners 2. Coal Tar Bitumen 3. Asphalt (ASTM D312 Type III) Special Recommendations: (See chart above) a. A base sheet should be first nailed to the deck, using the approved number' and type of fasteners, prior to Install- ihg the insulation board. b. A /x" wood fiber or equivalent board should be installed over the Rx lnsu- lation. Stagger board joints. c. A base sheet should first be mopped to the deck using Type III asphalt prior to installing the insulation board. d. A /z" wood fiber or equivalent board should be installed over Rx Insulation. Or a venting type base sheet should be mopped over the Rx Insulation as the first ply bf the BUR system. Manufacturers of base sheet products should be contacted to determine what constitutes a venting base sheet and how the base sheet should be •. A 1 /2" wood fiber or equivalent board should be installed over Rx Insulation. Stagger board joints. Or a glass base sheet should be solid mopped over Rx Insulation. These recommendations are based on evidence and are subject to change. Important Application Considerations Introduction Roof insulation plays a major part in the conservation of our nation's energy resources and it has become an impor- tant part of a building owner's energy savings package. Of equal importance to an insulation's thermal performance is the product's ability to become a compatible part of the roofing assembly. The primary purpose of roof board in- sulation is to provide an energy efficient roof. Selection of a high R per inch prod- uct such as Rx Insulation recognizes the importance of this building component. The maximum benefit of this product can be obtained by following the best industry practices. Specifications The roof board insulation shall be by Koppers Company, Inc. The Rx Roof Insulation shall be _inches thick with an R value of _. Insulation Application Built-up roofing and adhered single -ply systems require maximum adhesion of the roof insulation to assure optimum membrane performance. Roof insula- tion as well can be exposed to unusual stress or even damaged when poorly or partially attached. Good attachment is a must for success. Koppers will not be responsible for any damage caused by or the result of unsatis- factory attachment. To avoid this potential problem, be sure that each board is securely attached to its substrate. Mechanical fastening is the surest way to avoid lack of attach- ment. Hot bitumen attachment can be accomplished with careful application controls and techniques. Koppers re- quires that insulation attachment with- stand 60 lbs. per sq. foot (minimum) wind uplift force. Koppers recommends checking with local codes for other requirements. Mechanical Attachment Attachment by mechanical fastening is the recommended method whenever possible. Factory Mutual now requires total mechanical fastening for steel deck construction. Rx Insulation currently requires a min- imum of 4 fasteners per 3' x 4' board (3 sq. ft. /fastener) for an FM 1.60 approval and a minimum of 5 fasteners per 3' x 4' board (2.4 sq. ft. /fastener) for an 1 -90 approval. For a 4' x 8' board, 8 fasteners are required (4 sq. ft. /fastener) for a FM 1 -60 approval, and 11 fasteners (2.9 sq. ft. /fastener) for an 1 -90 approval. All fasteners must be FM approved and installed as prescribed by FM. The placement of the fasteners must be as illustrated below. T 1 1. recta, µMal 440 tr —g- 0 - add for 1.90 tr Bitumen Attachment When mechanical fastening is not preferred or may not be practical, such as on concrete decks, hot applied coal tar or asphalt bitumens may be used. When using asphalt on concrete decks, priming is necessary. When using hot applied bitumen for attachment, care must be taken to apply the material in sufficient quantity to totally cover the available deck surface. Use just enough material to assure adhesion. The temperature of the bitumen is im- portant. It must be hot enough at the moment the board is installed to allow embedment of the board. To assure embedment, the board must also be stepped on at several points when the bitumen is still hot enough to allow for full adhesion. It is recommended that attachment be checked from time to time by removing and inspecting a recently installed board. Cold adhesives are not acceptable for the installation of Rx Insulation. Roof Membrane Application Recommendations Rx Insulation should be attached to the deck as noted in the application recom- mendations chart. Roof bitumens used with Rx Roof- board must not be applied at tempera- tures exceeding 400 °F for coal tar and 425 °F for asphalt. Koppers Coal Tar Built -Up -Roof Systems Koppers coal tar and felt systems can be directly mopped to Rx Roofboard Insulation. The use of wood fiber over- lays or vented base sheets are not required. All other general requirements should be followed according to Koppers specifications. Rx Insulation should be overlaid with a 1/2" wood fiber or equivalent board as noted in the Application Recommenda- tions Chart. 07220/KOP BuyLine 2281 A venting type base sheet may be in- stalled in lieu of the recommendation for an overlay board. Manufacturers of base sheet products should be contacted to determine what constitutes a venting base sheet and how the base sheet should be applied. Smooth Surface Membranes Rx Insulation should be overlaid with a /2" wood fiber or equivalent board as noted in the Application Recommenda- tions Chart. The insulation system should be attached either by mechanical fastening or hot bitumen. Install the membrane in accordance with the roof manufacturer's published specifications. Modified Bitumen Systems Rx Insulation should be overlaid with a 1/2" wood fiber or equivalent board. A glass base sheet is permitted. Con- sult membrane manufacturer. Install the membrane in accordance with the manufacturer's published specifications. Single -Ply Roofing Systems Semi - Attached Membrane Systems: Rx Insulation should be mechanically fastened or bitumen attached to the deck as stipulated by the membrane manufacturer. Install the membrane in strict accord- ance with the manufacturer's published specifications. Fully Adhered Membrane Systems: A 1/2" wood fiber or equivalent board should be installed over the Rx Insu- lation. Stagger board joints. Install the membrane in strict accord- ance with the manufacturer's published specifications. Loose Laid Ballasted Single -Ply Roofing Systems Rx Roofboard Insulation will be installed looselaid. Install the membrane in strict accordance with the membrane manu- facturer's published specifications. The insulation board shall be installed in parallel courses, butted firmly, with the cross joints broken. On metal decks the long dimension of the board shall run parallel to the ribs with the long edges of the board resting firmly on the top of the ribs. Areas where excessive traffic Is anticipated must be adequately protected with a sur- face protection such as plywood. 5 Thermal Conductivity Measurement Recommended procedures for measuring thermal conductivity of closed -cell phenolic foam. Testing Background Closed cell phenolic foam is a relatively new material with a unique set of prop- erties. It is important to understand how these properties affect the performance of Rx Insulation products. If these fac- tors are not taken into consideration when testing for insulating value, it could lead to inaccurate results. The purpose of this section is to pro- vide necessary information to laboratory personnel unfamiliar with closed -cell phenolic foam. With this information and the recommended procedures, they will be able to make repeatable and accurate thermal measurements. Thermal conductivity measurement test ASTM C177-76 (Steady State Thermal Transmission by Means of the Guarded Hot Plate), ASTM C236-80 (Steady State Thermal Performance of Building Assem- blies by Means of a Guarded Hot Box), and ASTM C518.76 (Steady State Ther- mal Transmission Properties by Means of the Heat Flow Meter) will give accu- rate values for typical insulating mate- rials, including phenolic. Closed cell phenolic foam takes longer to reach steady state. This extra time to reach steady state is due to three important characteristics of phenolic foam: 1. The insulating value is extremely high. 2. Cell sizes are much smaller than those of other foams. 3. The heat capacity is very low, even at a nominal density of three pounds per cubic foot. These characteristics make it neces- sary to take additional time to reach "steady state" conditions, which means longer equilibration times in the instru- ment. An equilibrium thermal gradient and an equivalent moisture gradient must be established in the test apparatus. It is also important to eliminate, or hold to a minimum, preconditioning of the samples. Most insulations reach an equilibrium moisture content. Phenolics, because of the aforementioned proper- ties, require a longer period of time to reach equilibrium —care must be taken in preconditioning procedures not to generate undue internal cell pressures. Artificial embrittlement can also result from extreme drying conditions and may lead to shock sensitivity when heated or cooled too rapidly. There is also a possibility of error in the linearity of instrument response. This is because calibrations are made on 1" of fiberglass at k = .24 and samples of phenolic foam are frequently 3.6" thick 6 with k ..12, which means heat flow is measured at 1/7 the calibration value. The superior insulation value of closed - cell phenolic foam is independent of the facer system. However, the thermal conductivity measuring instruments are influenced by various facers and edge effects. The above considerations lead to the following recommendations for testing closed-cell phenolic foam. Alternative I 1. Permit samples to equilibrate with ambient atmospheric conditions (pref- erably temperatures of 75 °F ± 10 °, and relative humidities of 40% RH ± 10 %) for as long as practical (mini- mum one week). 2. Test full product thickness, with facers, except for foil based facer systems. When using this material, the foil "only" should be removed be- fore measuring. No further "precon- ditioning" (artificial drying) is required. 3. Allow a minimum of 6 hours equilibra- tion time in the measuring instrument. Some samples (especially thicker samples, may take 16.18 hours to reach "steady state "). Hourly read- ings should be taken and recorded. At no time should the test be terminated when hourly readings are decreasing monotonically. This alternative is preferred since it most closely approximates the in -place insulation value attained in most appli- cations. Sheathing and other foil -based materials should use this method exclusively. Alternative II This method is intended for limited usage and is applicable only when instrument time is limited. 1. Permit samples to equilibrate with ambient atmospheric conditions (pref- erably temperatures of 75 °F ± 10 °, and relative humidities of 40% ± 10 %) for as long as practical (minimum one week). 2. Test full product thickness, with fac- ers, except for foil - skinned material. When using this material, the foil (only) should be removed before pre- conditioning and measuring. 3. Precondition samples at 140 °F for 24 to 72 hours by placing samples in a room temperature oven, then heat the oven to 140 °F. At the end of the pre- conditioning period, turn oven off, allow oven to cool to room tempera- ture, remove samples and proceed with the test. (Thermal shock can also be minimized by surrounding test boards with "blank" samples to moderate heating and cooling rates.) 4. Allow minimum of four hours equili- bration time in the measuring instru- ment. Thicker samples may take somewhat longer. At no time should the measurement be terminated when hourly ratings are decreasing monotonically. Note: Attention to proper procedure is extremely important. If questions arise regarding specifics of measuring thermal conductivities of closed -cell phenolic foam, a Koppers representa- tive should be contacted. c c General Application Considerations Roof Deck Recommendations The roof deck is the foundation for the insulation and membrane roof assembly. The performance of any assembly will de- pend on the integrity of that foundation. Although special application recom- mendations may be suggested for some decks, Rx Insulation can be installed over most types of roof decks in the con- ventional manner. Metal roof decks shall be designed so that they will not have a deflection ex- ceeding 1/240 of a clear span under all types of loads (live & dead) when sub- jected to 300 lbs. concentrated on a 1 sq. ft. area at midspan. Designer should take into account roof traffic conditions, all roof mounted mechanical equipment, as well as equipment used in the appli- cation of the roof. Koppers acceptance of any deck as satisfactory to receive Rx Roof Insulation involves the deck surface only. It is the responsibility of the building designer and the deck manufacturer to establish the requirements for: a. Expansion and contraction in a man- ner that will create a stable base for the roof insulation. b. Support of maximum anticipated loads. c. Acceptable deck deflection. Koppers will not assume responsibil- ity for.deck defects, bitumen drippage, or the placement of conduits, bolt heads, etc., above the roof deck. Surface Preparation Decks must be rigid, well attached, dry, smooth, clean, free of defects and be installed in accordance with the manu- facturer's recommendations. All projections or openings in the deck should be completed before the applica- tion of the insulation and roofing. Insulation Stops At all roof edges and roof openings. Wolmanized' pressure - treated wood nailers should be installed. The thick- ness of the nailer must correspond to the thickness of the insulation and be approximately 6" wide. On decks with slopes greater than two inches per foot. Wolmanized pressure - treated wood insulation stops should be used. The thickness of the stops should be the same as the thickness of the insulation. They must be securely fas- tened to the deck, perpendicular to the slope line of the roof. The maximum spacing of the stops should be 481/4" from face to face. Vapor Retarders Vapor retarders are used to control the flow of water vapor from the interior of the building into the roofing assembly. Vapor retarders are located between the deck and the roof insulation in roof assemblies. Since the architects and building designers are aware of the actual con- ditions of the specific installation, they have the responsibility for determining if a vapor retarder should be used. The application of the vapor retarder should be in accordance with the recom- mendations of the manufacturer of the vapor retarder specified and be compati- ble with Koppers insulation and attach- ment recommendations. Roof Membrane Application Water Cutoffs At the completion of each day's work, all exposed edges of the uncompleted in- sulated roof membrane system must be sealed by means of a temporary water cut -off. It is extemety important that moisture not be allowed to enter the complete system. To avoid localizing conditions within the insulation chamber, all temporary water cut -offs must be totally removed when the application continues. Install the roofing system in strict accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and recommendations. Special Application Recommendations Temporary Roofs The application of an insulated roof membrane system prior to the building structure being ready to accept the system has been recognized as a major cause of premature roof failure. All work, such as vent pipes, nailers, curbs, perimeter walls, drains, etc., must be in place prior to the installation of the insulated roofing system. If such work cannot be completed prior to the need for weather protection, Koppers recommends a temporary roof- ing system which should be removed and replaced by the permanent system when the structure is ready. No roof insulation should be applied until the permanent roofing system is installed. Reroofing When reroofing, complete removal of the old roof membrane and insulation is the preferred procedure. This allows the deck to be checked for structural integ- rity and a new insulated roof assembly 07220/KOP BuyLine 2281 to be installed in accordance with state of the art standards. When it is not possible to remove the old roofing system, certain factors must be considered. • All existing insulation must be dry, well attached and structurally sound. • The existing roof must also be dry, smooth and well attached. Any wet and /or damaged areas must be removed and replaced with material of equal thickness, leaving a level sub- strate to receive the new insulation. Where possible, it is suggested that a new layer of insulation be installed over the old roof. Mechanical fastening is the preferred method of attachment. When attaching the new insulation to the exist- ing roof or insulation with hot bitumen, extreme care must be taken that a suf fi- cient quantity of bitumen is used in order to obtain total adhesion of the new board. Precautions Protection of Material Keeping insulation dry and undamaged is essential to assure maximum thermal and structural performance with the roofing insulation membrane assembly. Rx Insulation is shipped covered with plastic shrouds which are intended to temporarily protect the material while in transit. When possible it is recom- mended that the shrouds be removed 7 General Application Considerations (continued) during storage at the job site and the material be covered with a breathable weather -proof covering such as tar- paulins. Roof insulation which has become wet and /or damaged should be removed and replaced by solid dry insulation. Rx Insulation has been designed to withstand normal construction traffic. However, protection from mechanical damage by excessive traffic and /or abuse is extremely important. Areas where excessive traffic is antici- pated must be adequately protected with a surface protection such as plywood. It is recommended that test cuts be taken in protected and unprotected traffic areas to determine if damage is occu ring. Areas which have become damaged should be removed and replaced. Protection is especially Important when single -ply systems are being In- stalled; special application equipment may also be required. If damage is occuring, steps must be taken to reduce the amount of weight or more properly distribute the weight. Cold Weather Applications Best roofing results are obtained in warm, dry weather. Roofing system installation at temperatures below 45 °F requires special precautions to insure satisfactory performance of the finished roof. The deck surface must be dry and free from all traces of ice, snow and moisture before applying roof insulation. Any moisture present on the deck at the time the roof insulation is applied may result in poor adhesion of materials to the deck and blistering of the membrane. Although mechanical fastening is the preferred method of attachment, if hot bitumens are used it is recommended that their point of application tempera- tures be not less than 375 °F coal tar bitumens; and 400 °F for steep asphalt. Special insulated equipment is often required during cold weather conditions in order to assure these point-of-applica - tion temperatures without exceeding the maximum heat limitations. Maximum recommended bitumen applica- tion temperature: Coal Tar -400° Steep Asphalt --425° Koppers The 21st Century Insulation OM•683 Seot.'88 r+ ■ Special Applications -400 Koppers recorfiniends Rx Roofboard Insulation only for roofing applications installed by a qualified roofing contractor. Factory M,t(Wei :fide .dppeayed the use of Rx Roof Insulation as a component in Class I insulated metal roof deck con- struction. Koppers has a similar fisting with Underwriters Laboratories when Rx Roof Insulation was tested as a com- ponent of an insulated roof deck con- struction using UL's test procedure. Koppers does not recommend the use of Rx Roof Insulation for any other appli- cations. Anyone using Rx Roof Insula- tion for any other application is doing so at their own risk. Koppers recommends that anyone using Rx Insulation for any other uses consult the local authority on the regula- tion of building materials (usually the building code official) and the insurance carrier prior to such use. • Health & Safety Issues Rx Insulation has not only exhibited superior thermal values, fire perform- ance characteristics and high dimen- sional stability, but it has also been tested for toxicity. It has been shown to have a very limited potential for adverse health effect. Rx Insulation has demon- strated no short term health effects except for the dust generated during cutting of the board which may cause eye irritation. Based on acute toxicity tests done according to protocols devel- oped by the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), a powder made from the board resin is less than "toxic" (FHSA definition) by ingestion or skin penetration and does not cause skin irritation. The powder from the board resin also gave negative results in the Additional Product Information bacterial mutagenicity assay, the Ames test, i.e., no genetic effects were ob- served in this test. Under flaming and non - flaming conditions, this insulation is "no more toxic than wood" (Doubles fir standard) based on the results of a combustion toxicity test developed by the National Bureau of Standards. The NBS protocol is only one of a number of available tests. This test and the other tests may not be predictive of performance under actual fire conditions. Limitation of Liability Roofing that incorporates Koppers insu- lation products, the company believes, results in a satisfactory installation when properly applied. Characteristics, properties or per- formances of materials or application specifications herein described are based on data obtained under controlled test conditions. Koppers Company, Inc. ( "Koppers ") warrants that its Rxo Insulation meets or exceeds all of its published specifica- tions in effect on the date of sale and that the represented thermal insulation values of the Rx Insulation will not vary beyond these specified limits for twenty (20) years from the date of its purchase from Koppers, subject to the provisions and limitations set forth in the warranty. See warranty for details. Koppers shall not be liable for any inci- dental or consequential damages to include the costs of installation, repair, removal or replacement of the product. will be refunded. No agent, salesman, representative or employee is empowered to change, alter or amend this provision unless it is done in writing by a duly authorized officer or employee of Koppers Company, Inc. 1,0" 45 1.2 39 1.5 30 1.75 27 2.0 21 2.4 18 3.0 15 3.6 12 540 1440 468 1248 360 960 324 864 252 672 216 576 180 480 144 — .288 monolithic surface only .338 2% .413 2% .476 3% .538 3% .638 3% .788 3% .938 3% r C For flute spans greater than 33/, inches special provisions may be necessary. For specific information consult your Koppers representative. "1" prod. not factory mutual rated. For use over monolithic surface only. Koppers Company, Inc. c 1901 Koppers Bldg. Pittsburgh, PA 15219 1- 800.558 -2706 IAx insulation available in Canada) KOPPERS KOPPERS Insulation Products EVENGREEN STATE CONST. INC. 20 Year Limited Warranty Koppers Company, Inc. ( "Koppers ") warrants that its Rxe Insulation meets or exceeds all of its published specifications in effect on the date of sale and that the represented thermal Insulation values of the Rx Insulation will not vary beyond these specified limits for twenty (20) years from the date of its purchase from Koppers, subject to the following provisions and limitations: 1. Proof of Purchase: The buyer agrees to retain documentary proof of purchases (such as a sales receipt or purchase order) and to submit these materials to Koppers in the event of a claim under this Warranty. 2. Handling and Installation: Rx insulation must be handled accord- ing to Koppers instructions as out- lined in its product literature. KOP- PERS WILL NOT BE LIABLE FOR BREACH OF ANY WARRANTY IF THE Rx INSULATION IS ABUSED OR MISUSED OR IF THE INSULA- TION IS DAMAGED DUE TO THE FAILURE OF MEMBRANE OR ANY OTHER ROOF OR BUILDING COMPONENT. 3. Limitation of Express and Im- plied Warranties: This written war- ranty is Koppers sole warranty of the insulation. Buyer's rights are limited to those set forth in this warranty. Koppers disclaims all other ex- pressed or implied warranties, in- cluding the implied warranty of merchantability described in the Uniform Commercial Code. 4. Fitness for Particular Purpose: This Warranty is effective only if the Rx Insulation is used for the par- ticular purposes recommended in Koppers product literature. 5. Lack of Authority of Agents to Bind Seller: No agent, salesman, Important Notice To Buyer employee, or representative of Kop- pers is empowered to change, alter or amend this warranty unless it is done in writing by a duly authorized officer of Koppers. 6. Limitation of Koppers Liability: (a) Exclusive Remedies: THE REMEDY PROVIDED IN THIS SEC- TION IS BUYER'S EXCLUSIVEAND SOLE REMEDY FOR BREACH OF THIS WARRANTY. (b) Procedure to File a Claim: If at any time within twenty (20) years from the date of purchase of the in- sulation, the buyer detects a decline in its "R" value, he shall notify Koppers in writing within 60 days. The buyer agrees to take samples of the insulation at its expense and only in the presence of a Koppers repre- sentative and conduct tests to deter- mine the actual "R" value of the Rx insulation. If the owner removes or damages the insulation prior to this sampling, this Warranty shall be void and ineffective as to the removed or damaged portion. If the samples verify a reduction in "R" value from that set forth in Koppers specifications, Koppers will reim- burse the buyer for the sampling and testing costs and, at Koppers sole discretion, for either his in- crease in the cost of energy, deter- mined by the method set forth in "Koppers Rx Insulation Energy Loss Due to "R" Value Reduction Claims Settlement Procedure," or for the purchase price of the insulation. (c) Approved Testing Facility: All testing of Insulation samples will be conducted at a certified inde- pendent testing laboratory approved by Koppers according to the pro- cedures outlined in Koppers Tech- nical Bulletin "Thermal Conductivity Measurement." The findings of the laboratory shall be final and bidding on all parties. (d) Calculation of Buyer's in- creased Energy Costs: If Koppers chooses to reimburse the buyer for the increase in the buyer's energy bills, this amount will be calculated using the formula which appears in Koppers Technical Bulletin "Kop- pers Rx Insulation Energy Loss Due to "R" Value Reduction Claims Settle- ment Procedure." In no event, how- ever, will this reimbursement exceed the amount paid by the buyer for the insulation. (e) Contingency for Failure of Exclusive Remedy: IN THE EVENT THAT THIS REIMBURSEMENT REMEDY FAILS OF ITS ESSEN- TIAL PURPOSE, the buyer's sole and exclusive remedy shall be the refund of the purchase price for the insulation. 7. Statute of Limitations: Any action for breach of this Warranty must be commenced within one year after that cause of action has ac- crued. 8. No Consequential Damages: The buyer agrees that in no event will Koppers be liable for any special, incidental or consequential dam- ages of any kind, whether in con- tract tort or otherwise, including any damages arising from any use of or inability to use the Rx Insulation, whether through Koppers negli- gence or otherwise. 9. Complete Agreement of the Parties: This Warranty includes the complete and exclusive agreement between the buyer and Koppers Company, Inc. and supersedes any and all prior oral or written agree- ments or representations made by or between them. KOPPERS COMPANY, INC., KOPPERS BUILDING, PITTSBURGH, PA 15219 OM-889 -Aug. 1986 Koppers Phenolic Foam — Tomorrow's Insulation Today By Dr. Edward W. Kifer & Clyde E. Henry Science and Technology Group Koppers Company, Inc. Like all true inventions, it hap- pened quite by accident. One day in 1909, Dr. Leo Hendrick Baekeland, a Belgian chemist, was trying to produce a wood shellac coating when he dis- covered a curious reaction which lead to the discovery of phenolic resin. This marked the beginning of the "Age of Plastic." And, for more than 75 years, these phenolic condensation poly- mers have been studied. Since Dr. Baekeland's discovery, phenolic resins have been used in the auto- motive, housing, computer, lumber and other industries. In spite of this long, successful history of the use of phenolic resins, development of phenolic foam as an insulation product has been slow. In the past, certain inherent characteristics of phenolic foam limited its use as insulation -- characteristics such as friability, corrosivity and poor insulation value. Such drawbacks frequently out- weighed the inherent advantages of phenolic polymers, such as overall superior fire properties and service temperatures, low smoke toxicity and dimensional stability. It wasn't until Koppers Company, Inc., Pittsburgh, invented a "closed- cell" phenolic foam in 1981, that attention shifted in favor of phenolic foam for insulation. This development overcame the "classic" disadvantages of phenolic foam noted above. The technique of creating a phe- nolic foam with closed cells per- mitted retention of the blowing agent, thereby resulting in ex- tremely good insulating properties — superior to all other available insulation materials. Foams pro- duced using this new technology also featured friability, comparable with isocyanurate and some ure- thane foams. By utilizing the advantages of phenolic polymers, while eliminat- ing to a significant extent its dis- advantages, phenolic foam insula- tion is now a unique candidate to compete with any other product types in the marketplace. Now the insulation is rapidly gaining market acceptance in many applications where rigid foam plastic insulations are al- ready being used. Phenolic Foams Hold Fluorocarbons Better Popular roofing insulations, such as wood fiber or fiber glass, mini- mize heat conduction and transfer by trapping air between the ran- domly oriented fibers. This pro- vides the discontinuous path for heat transfer, thus establishing thermal value. If such cells or voids in the in- sulation are filled with air, its k- value (conductivity value) will be approximately 0.22 to 0.25. The cells of expanded polystyrene in- sulation board for instance are filled with air and offer a k -value of 0.25. Urethane closed -cell foam in- sulation revolutionized the insula- tion industry with the use of fluoro- carbon gas as the foaming agent. The fluorocarbon molecule is large and "clumsy" and resists energy transfer. Thus, fluorocarbon gas has half the conductivity of air, making closed -cell fluorocarbon insulation twice as effective. In- sulations made with fluorocarbon exhibit k- values as low as 0.10 to 0.11. However, urethane and iso- syanurate foams are chemically compatible with fluorocarbon blowing agents that are soluble within the urethane - polymer cell wall. This means that, over a period of time, fluorocarbon gas passes through the cell wall and becomes displaced with air. This is called FEB X@Erni) 27 1987 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. "thermal drift" and is accompanied by a reduction of insulation value. Impermeable facers help these foams retain their insulating value. Fluorocarbon gas is chemically incompatible with the phenolic - polymer, and is not soluble within the cell wall — thus eliminating typical thermal drift. Also, phenolic foam cells are about one -half the size of urethane and isocyanurate cells, providing eight times as many fluorocarbon- retaining cell walls per cubic inch and reducing further the loss of insulation value. Therefore, Koppers closed -cell phenolic insulation's natural ability to contain fluorocarbon gas results in a low k -value of 0.12. Accelerated aging tests con- ducted on Koppers phenolic in- sulation at 140° F have been car- ried out by Dynatech, a well - known thermal testing laboratory in Cambridge, Mass. Ninety, one hundred eighty and three hundred and sixty day thermal values were all found to be 0.12 or less over several product thicknesses. Phenolic Cells "Breath" Water Vapor Different insulation systems re- spond differently to moisture, both in dimensional stability of the foam board and thermal efficiency. The moisture permeability of urethane, isocyanurates and poly- styrene insulations is relatively low, making these products slow to absorb moisture. But once mois- ture has entered the cell structure of these plastic foams, it is difficult to remove, even where humidity conditions are low. The closed -cell phenolic foam developed by Koppers also effec- tively limits liquid water penetration while retaining the capacity for "breathing" water. vapor. Phenolic foam cell walls, while impermeable to fluorocarbon, pass water vapor with.little resistance. Moisture And The Facer System Phenolic roofing products his- torically used a three -part cor- rugated facer system: An aluminum foil laminated to a kraft paper laminated to a corrugated kraft medium. This facer has been used primarily for its ability to vent gases and water vapor, both during manufacture and field installation of the product. The advantages of this system is that built -up felt plies can be mopped directly over the cor- rugated face of the phenolic foam without first installing an overlay board or vented base sheet. The open flutes in the corrugated facer permit water vapor and gases to escape from the roofing cavity when hot bitumen is applied. Phenolic foam using this unique facing system has been very effec- tive in minimizing blistering of roofing membranes. However, it was discovered that the corrugated kraft medium has a tendency to absorb liquid water. If properly protected from the elements, this tendency is not important. The environment and its effect on the product should al- ways be considered when design- ing a roofing system. But when a corrugated facer became wet, due to inadequate job -site protection or leaks in the roofing membrane, it became weak and this affected the ability of the facer to contribute to the dimensional stability of the insulation board. The technology of phenolic foam insulation board continued to develop. And, in 1984, it was dis- covered that inorganic materials would offer the phenolic foam board better strength, less mois- ture absorbency and more damage resistance than the kraft -paper facer. Late that year, a new type of asphalt- coated glass fiber facer was developed for the phenolic foam insulation board. Koppers has chosen to differentiate this product by giving it a new name — Koppers Rx'" Insulation. Phenolic Foam Features Low Dimension Change It's important here to remember that all building materials undergo dimensional change, given varying moisture content and changing temperature. Some materials, such as steel or aluminum, are affected more by temperature variations, while cellular materials — such as wood or foamed - plastic insulation — respond more to moisture content. The ASTM D 2126 -75 standard test for the "Response of Rigid Cellular Plastics to Thermal and Humid Aging" has been adopted as the method of determining dimensional stability of a cellular roofing insulation. In this test, an accurate measure- ment of length, width and thick- ness of a foam -board section is made prior to a seven -day ex- posure to 95- percent relative humidity at 158° Fahrenheit. After exposure, the section is again measured, and results are reported as a plus -or -minus percent change of length, width and thickness. Within the roof cavity, small dimensional changes of insulation are of little consequence. But sig- nificant changes can create more serious problems with regard to stress and proper support of the roofing membrane. Some cellular plastics commonly used in roofing today exhibit dimensional changes of up to four percent. Koppers closed cell phenolic foam board changes dimension by no more than one percent. The new inor- ganic facer systems will allow Rx'" Insulation to capitalize on the in- herent good stability of the foam to a greater degree. The Issue Of Corrosion The subject of the corrosiveness of phenolic foam has been dis- cussed in the literature for more than 20 years. In spite of this, very few documented studies on corro- sion rates have been published. Most references have been con- cerned with the qualitative visual estimation of surface reaction to metal substrates under "wet" con- ditions. Open- celled phenolic foams catalyzed with mineral acids usually were the material tested. Any corrosion observed was understandable, because of the high water capacity of these pre- vious open - celled foams. However, it's important to emphasize that cured phenolic polymers, per se, were not seen as the corrosive agent. The open - celled, sponge -like nature of the foams studied were very effective in retaining water under wet test conditions, per- mitting the strongly corrosive mineral acids to exert their dam - aging effects on exposed metal surfaces. State -of- the-art technology for manufacturing phenolic foam has resulted in a new generation of material that has little resemblance to the material that generated the concerns of the past. Koppers closed -cell foam, although it is reasonably permeable to water vapor, does not behave as a "sponge" for liquid water because the physical passage of liquid water through the cell structure has virtually been eliminated. An additional benefit arises from the lesser degree of catalyst "leachability" from closed -cell foam. Phenolic foam produced by Koppers is not catalyzed with mineral acids, but has always been catalyzed with a unique blend of organic acids. To evaluate possible corrosion - related properties of the Koppers closed -cell phenolic foam, many types of testing procedures were utilized. Among these were: 1. End -use application studies, using test roof cuts, on the oldest phenolic insulated decks available, 2. Standard metallurgical coupon testing, and accelerated metallur- gical coupon testing at 100° Fahr- enheit and 90- to 95- percent relative humidity. 3. Fastener immersion in liquid catalyst system followed by tensile testing. 4. Comparative testing against other products. 5. Weatherometer testing. 6. Small-scale test deck evalua- tions. 7. Independent laboratory testing evaluations. 8. Ambient and accelerated coupon testing on all common metal -based deck materials, in- cluding galvanized, painted and mild steel under constantly wet, occasionally wet and dry con- ditions. Based on this testing and all other current comparative testing on competitive insulation products (long -term testing continues), the following conclusions can be reached: 1. Properly applied phenolic foam does not present a significant C. corrosion hazard to either metal decks or approved mechanical fasteners; 2. Any effects related to corro- sion, as they occur in the field, are likely to be insignificant for all insulations tested; that is, none would be expected to affect the performance of the roofing system; 3. Corrosive behavior of Koppers closed -cell insulation is usually characterized by short -term sur- faces interaction with the roof deck followed by Tong -term pas - sivation of active metal surfaces. Long -term corrosion rates are essentially the same as for com- parable roofing insulations. The Controversy Of Color Another frequently asked ques- tion about phenolic foam is about color consistency throughout the board, the changes in its color with time, and the question of color as it relates to degree of curing. The color of phenolic foam ranges anywhere from nearly white to pink, purple, tan or brown. Its color depends on trace amounts of chromophores, or "color bodies," which are naturally present in phenol resins. The development of "color bodies" in generic phenol - based products has been the sub- ject of numerous studies over the past 25 years. These color bodies change color with age and with small changes in temperature, ultra - violet or infra- red exposure, and oxygen. Nor- mally, the final color of the foam is a light tan or brown. Reaction of the color bodies within the foam is not an indica- tion of phenolic foam's state of cure. Koppers phenolic foam in- sulation board, regardless of color, is cured by the time it leaves the factory warehouse. Installation Of The Insulation One key difference in phenolic foam from other polymer insula- tions is its "recovery ", or resiliency to workmen and equipment traffic and, later, weight of the roofing membrane. OM 825 Feb. 85 By its very nature, phenolic foam features a higher compres- sion modulus than most other polymer foams. At moderate den- sities (2.5 to 2.8 PCF) Koppers phenolic foam exhibits compres- sive strengths of 22 to 30 psi. This value is higher than most com- petitive foam insulations. However, phenolic foam does not exhibit the same degree of re- covery as polystyrene- or polyure- thane -based foams. The "mode of failure," as phenolic foam -board performs as a roofing substrate, is different under excessive Toads. Any insulation damage due to overloading is more visible, such as "tracks," along unprotected, heavily used equipment paths. As with all foam Insulations, good roofing practice calls for the use of plywood or other protective ma- terial along paths of heavy traffic, particularly when installing single - ply membranes. Although such damage is more visible with phenolic foam, the loss of insulation value due to "crush- ing" is typically much less for phenolic than with other "high R" foams (as measured in cyclic foam compression tests). While an in- sulation board must provide a good substrate for the roofing membrane, ultimately the building owner places more importance on the thermal efficiency of the roof- ing system than on other factors. Moreover, with properly de- signed roofing systems — and where good roofing practices are used during installation — phenolic foam insulation provides excellent, dimensionally stable roofing sub- strates. But it does remain some- what less "forgiving," cosmetically, than some other systems. The issue of damage resistance still remains as the lone barrier to phenolic foam insulation becoming "the perfect product" for roof Insulation. Product Improvements For 1985 Recognizing the benefits of in- organic facing materials — high strength, low moisture absorbency and damage - resistance of glass and foils — significant product improvements have been made in phenolic foam board insulation since its commercial introduction in 1982. These changes,have been made primarily in selection of the facer material to increase the strength of the insulation product. Such changes in the Koppers phenolic -foam product line are the result of extensive product de- velopment and testing procedures and of field testing in a variety of end -use applications. One form of the new Koppers Rx Insulation features the use of its new glass facers on both sides of the phenolic foam. This is for use under built -up roofing systems and for all attached single -ply roofing membranes. The second form con- sists of a foil -kraft paper bi- laminate on top with the asphalt - coated glass fiber facer laminated to the bottom. This product is for use only under loose -laid ballasted single -ply roofing systems. In Summary... In summary, Koppers phenolic technology presents a bright future. With the new product types and the experience gained from three years of full commercialization, to- day's "phenolic foam of the future" offers the following advantages: 1. The best thermal value of any insulation available; 2. Best retention of thermal value of any insulation available; 3. Superior fire performance characteristics, offering the lowest smoke development rating of any plastic foam insulation available; 4. Dimensional stability, exceed- ing RIC/TIMA standards; 5. Resistance to solvents, and also featuring non - melting, non - softening, non- punking char- acteristics, and offering an excel- lent service temperature range; 6. Long -term corrosiveness of phenolic foam is comparable to competitive foam insulation products; 7. The ability to "breath" water vapor while retaining the fluoro- carbon blowing agent. Koppers Company, Inc. Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 • KOPPERS • ( UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. • 333 mNc!Tvl 11OAD • NO*1NUIOOK.ILLINOIS WOO an independent, not-for-profit organization testing for public safety cc: File NFF - Writer January 17, 1986 Koppers Co., Inc. Mr. Hank Mader 701 Koppers Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Man FEB 27 19e7 D EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. .Our Referecne: R927, 85NK2263 Subject: Koppers' Type Rx Foam Insulation In Design No. P715 Dear Mr. Maders: This is in regard to your request for confirmation that Koppers' Type Rx foam insulation will be Classified for use in Fire Resistance Design No. P715. The description of the roof - ceiling. assembly Design No. P715 as it will appear in our 1986 Fire Resistance Directory is attached. Presently, the formal Report describing the performance of the roof - ceiling.. assembly during the fire test is being finalized and will be forwarded to you shortly. Very truly yours, Reviewed by: THOMAS R. EBERT (Ext. 3086) Project Engineer Fire Protection Department THE /BS:mjw LTR8 B. SWYTNY xt. 2315) Engineering Group Leader Fire Protection Department Look For The ® Listing or Classification Mark On The Product ICI MI Mai 2111414.1 C.MM IAWIC NOUT161111001I. i isles Mtit 1/Iiu1 Ga a'e 8 XOV Fire Resisttaec ,emit . 4Jesijn Na. P7/5 Resfr?iyecr ffssemy 6/y 'ret - 6 /1 e.mrestraine.�/ Assemd /y Ri�'a /, /z h7, esfraia..1 $�a„�► fat. - / /z • fa tc (P715 -4 cos./ or 2 N (See. -r, ., di) er Zf/ (See 7).? 8) e. Zf/ 8) 343/111 'FEB 871991 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. ' File R927 Guide BXUV Fire Resistance Ratings (P715 -B Card) i 'Design No. P715 Restrained Assembly Ratings 1, 1 -1/2 or 2 H (See Item 8) Unrestrained Assembly Ratings 1, 1 -1/2 or 2 H (See Item 8) Unrestrained Beam Rating - 1, 1 -1/2 or 2 H (See Item 8) 1. Beam - W6X16 min size or, Steel Joist - 10H4 min size. 2. Roof Covering* - Consisting of hot mopped or cold application bituminous materials compatible with the insulation(s) described herein which provide Class A, B or C coverings. See Building Materials Directory.- Roof Covering Materials (TFJR). 2A. In lieu of Item 2, roof covering consisting of single -ply Sheathing Material* that is either ballasted, adhered or mechanically attached as permitted under the respective manufacturer's Classification. See Fire Resistance Directory - Sheathing Material* (CHIZ). 3. Roof Insulation - Foamed Plastic* - 36 by 48 by 1.2 in. thick applied in one or two layers. Asphalt (or coal tar pitch) may be applied between layers of boards and to vapor retarder or roof deck if vapor retarder is not used. As an alternate, the foamed plastic may be attached to the roof deck by self - drilling, self - tapping steel screws through steel or plastic washers. The minimum cover of cementitious mixture to the tip of the screws shall be 1/2 in. When Classified Sheathing Material with mechanical fasteners is used (Item 2A), the self- drilling, self- tapping steel screws may be omitted from the roof insulation. Koppers Co. Inc. - Rx 4. Mineral and Fiberboard *. - 3/4 in. thick applied to foamed plastic (Item 3) with asphalt or coal tar pitch. Joints to be offset from joints of foamed plastic. I cs WED FEB27 19e EVERGREEN STATE CONST,INC. ■ M1� File R927 Guide BXUV Fire Resistance Ratings (P715 -B Card). Johns- Manville Corp. 4A. Wood Fiberboard Insulation - When Item 2A is used, 1/2 in.. thick wood - fiberboard insulation applied to roof insulation with (Item 3) asphalt (or coal tar pitch). Joints to be offset from joints of roof insulation. Wood fiberboard insulation specifications as specified under the respective manufacturer's Classification for Sheathing Material.* 5. Asphalt or Coal Tar Pitch* - The vapor retarder, or first layer of roof insulation (if vapor retarder is not used), may be secured with asphalt or coal tar pitch to the steel deck crest surfaces at a max rate of 15 lb /100 ft3. Also used to attach each additional layer of roof insulation, mineral and fiberboard or wood fiberboard insulation, applied at a max rate of 25 lb /100 ft=. See Building Material Directory for Built -Up Roof Covering Materials. 6. Sheathing Material* - Optional - Vinyl film or paper scrim vapor barrier applied with asphalt or coal tar pitch or laid loosely on the steel roof deck, overlapped approx 2 in. on adjacent sheets. See Sheathing Material (CHIZ) category for names of manufacturers. 7. Steel Roof Deck - (Unclassified) - Min 1 -1/2 in. deep and 30 in. wide, galv fluted steel deck. Flutes 6 in. O.C. with crest width ranging from 3 -5/8 to 5 -1/16 in. Min gauge is 22 MSG. Ends overlapped at supports min 1 -1/2 in. and welded to supports at deck laps and a max of 12 in. O.C. between sides of units. Side laps of adjacent units welded, button - punched or secured together with No. 12 by 3/4 in. long self- drilling, self - tapping steel screws spaced a maximum of 36 in. O.C. 10171ED FEB 27 1987. EVERGREEN STATE CONSL INC. File R927 Guide BXUV December 19,11985 Fire Resistance Ratings (P715 -B. Card) 8. Cementitious Mixture* - Applied by mixing with water and spraying in more than one coat to final thicknesses as shown in the illustration above and in the table below, to steel surfaces which must be clean and free of dirt, loose scale and oil. Steel deck surface must be "spatter" coated with Type SK -1 cementitious mixture prior to application of Type MK -5 cementitious mixture. Type SK -1 cementitious mixture applied in accordance with the manufacturer's application instructions. Type MK -5 cementitious mixture applied over "spatter" coat at min average and min individual density of 15 and 14 pcf, respectively. For method of density determination, see Design Information Section. Thickness of the spatter coat is included in the total final thickness of the protection material. Restrained and Unrestrained Unrestrained Cementitious Assembly Rating, Beam Rating, Mixture Thickness, in. h h On Deck On Beam On Joist 1 1 1 -3/16 1 -1/8 1 -3/4 1 -1/2 1 -1/2 1 -5/8 1 -1/4 1 -7/8 2 2 2 1 -3/8 2 Zonolite Const. Products Div., W. R. Grace & Co. - Types SK -1 and MK -5 9. Glass Fiber Mesh - Optional - Square mesh, 3/32 to 3/16 in. fiberglass scrim fabric, weighing approx 1.9 to 2.5 oz /ydl shall be attached to one side of each joist web member. The method of attaching the mesh must be sufficient to hold the mesh and the spray - applied cementitious mixture material in place during application, until it has cured.. An acceptable method to attach the mesh is by embedding the mesh in minimum 1/4 in. long beads of hot - melted glue. The beads of glue shall be spaced a maximum of 12 in. O.C. along the top chord of the bar joist. Another method to secure the mesh is by 1 -1/4 in. long by 1/2 in. wide hairpin clips formed from No. 18 SWG or heavier steel wire. sa„1) � . FEB 27187 EVERGREEN, STATE CQNST. INC. • • Nt File R927 Guide BXUV Fire Resistance Ratings (P715 -B Card) 9A. Metal Lath - Optional - Diamond mesh, 3/8 in. expanded steel lath,, 1.7 to 3.4 lb /yd2. Lath secured to one side of each steel joist with No. 18 SWG gale steel wire at joist web and bottom chord members, spaced 15 in. O.C. max. 10. Bridging - (Not shown) - Min 1 -1/4 by 1 -1/4 by 1 /8.in. thick steel angles welded to top and bottom chords of each joist. Number and spacing of bridging angles per Steel Joist Institute specifications. Bridging coated with the same thickness of Type MK-5 cementitious mixture (Item 8) as the. joist. *Bearing the UL Classification Marking. =E8 2 0 1.987 •• l UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 1 . 5.11 PFINGSTEN ROAD • NORTH3ROOK. ILWNOI5 80061 an independent, not - for - profit organization testing for pubt File: R9 Project: 86NK25718 Type: L February 18, 1987 Mr. Henry J. Mader Koppers Co., Inc. Koppers Bldg. Pittsburgh, PA 15219 CUT OB 87 1907 D N STATE CONST. INC. Product: Roofing Systems The following material resulting from the investigation under the above numbers is enclosed (see attached Addendum for page numbers) : Additional Section for Follow -Up Service Procedure. Revised or new pages and illustrations for Follow -Up Service Procedure. Please file revised pages and illustrations in place of material of like identity. New material should be filed in its proper numerical order. Please review this material and report any inaccuracies to R. Backstrom, referring to the above project number. JL:ist /LTR3 Encl. - Report cc: Paul Zeh - Enc. Proc. Oak Creek, WI cc: Plant Manager - Enc. Proc. Bridgeville, PA cc: Milwaukee IC - Enc. cc: Pittsburgh IC - Enc. cc: Barbara Woitechko - Enc. Proc. Monroeville, PA cc: FUS - Enc. Proc. Phlox 4111) $734IIS Jeanne Lundsten UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. Look For The ® Listing or Classification Mark On The Product Ma tt+ N Nt.i MAW COW UtMIO MORn+MOOIt,1. Ma Ulm Num MN10111 T.M.gl.n MI) 0714114 S /'„ t'.• UNDEkWRITEkS LABORATORIES INC. ADDENDUM TO TRANSMITTAL LETTER File R927 Project _ 86NK25718 pan% FEB 27 1987 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. Report Date Vol. Sec. Revised or New Material 8 - Revised Authorization Page 8 3 Revised Pages 2, 3 2 -18 -87 - - All Issued Note: Follow -Up Service Procedure revisions do not include Cover Pages, Test Records and Conclusion Pages. Report revisions do not include Authorization Pages, Index, Sec. Gen and Appendices... • • Pla7k) FEB 2 0 1987 FEB 27 19-87 PARMA STATE CONST. INC. UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 11:4311/71EL) `1/ 333 PP)?CSTLN ROAD • NORTHBROOK. ILLINOIS eoo62 • ,FEB 871987 an independent, not- for - profit organization testing for public safety 'EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. File R927 Project 86NK25718 February 18, 1987 REPORT on FOAMED PLASTICS Koppers Co., Inc. Pittsburgh, PA Copyright Q 1987 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. . Underwriters Laboratories Inc authorizes the above named company . to reproduce this Report provided it is reproduced in its entirety. RB/ RNW : ist; ,Ibry I4�irt 41P m IN Look For The ® Listing or Classification Mark On Th. Product ma ma )M.3 swan CO" ULINC MOQTIIMOOM. M. YO TMw ":1 M1041047; Trpgrrn (UI) 411411$_. File R927 D E S C R I P T I O N EVERGREEN STATE CONST, INC. PRODUCT COVERED: The product covered by this Report is a 2 in. thick foamed plastic panel faced on both surfaces with a glass mat andwith an .;additional, 3. mil aluininum facer laminated to the interior surface. USE: This product is intended for use as .a building material as permitted by authorities having jurisdiction. File R927 Page T1 -1 filatrYq I ssued: 18 -87 FEB 27 19_87 T E S T R E C O R D NO. 1 EXAMINATION OF MATERIALS: The samples selected for this investigation were produced under the observation of a representative of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. Information with regard to the composition and the components of the finished unit is proprietary and is on file at the Laboratories for use in the Follow -Up Service Program. Various chemical and physical tests were conducted on the finished material and the components. The results developed from these tests were employed in establishing specifications for use in the Follow -Up Program. SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS TESTS: SAMPLES The samples tested consisted of a foamed plastic board material submitted at thicknesses of.2 in., and at a density of 2.25 pcf.. The foamed plastic boards were faced on both surfaces with a glass mat, with an additional 1 mil aluminum facer on .the interior surface. In order to evaluate the contributing effects of the internal combustible materials, the finished boards were tested both with and without a slit in the facing material. In each test, the test specimens were 24 in. wide by 24 ft long, made up of three 8 ft long sections butted together end -to -end. A 14 in. length of uncoated No. 16 gauge sheet steel was placed on the specimen mounting ledge in front of and under the specimen in the upstream end of the tunnel to complete the 25 ft length. RB /RNW:ist ibry �. File R927 Page T1 -2 Issued: 2 -18 -87 METHOD The tests were conducted in accordance with Underwriters Laboratories Inc.'s Standard Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, UL 723. RESULTS Data on flame spread and smoke developed appears in the following tabulations: Flame Spread Index The maximum distance the flame spreads along the length of the sample from the end of the igniting flame is determined by observation. Upon exposure to the igniting flame, the samples softened, melted, and fell to the furnace floor beginning first in the area of the igniting flame. Ignition of the matter residue on the fiinace floor occurred in all tests. The Flame Spread Index of the material is derived by determining the area under the flame spread distance (ft) versus time (min) curve, ignoring any flame front recession, and using one of the calculation methods as described below: 1. If the total area (Am) is less than or equato 97.5 min -ft (meter - minute x 3.3 l' ), the Flame Spread Index shall be 0.515 times the total area, (FSI = 0.515 AT). 2. If the total area (Am) is greater than 97.5 min -ft (meter- minute x 3.3), the Flame Spread Index is to be 4900 divided by 195 minus the total area, (FSI = 4900/(195- AT)). ICEITEin FEB 27 1987 c" EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. File R927 Test No. Page T1 -3 Issued: 2 -18 -87 Actual Flame Sample Spread, Description ft 1 Core 3.0 2 Core 3.0 3 Core 3.0. 4 Fiberglass Face (Slit) 3.0 5. Fiberglass Face (Slit) 3.5 6 Fiberglass Face (Slit) 3.0, 7 Fiberglass Face (Unslit) 3.0 8 Foil Face (Slit) 3.5 9 Foil Face (Slit) 3.5 10 Foil Face (Slit) 3.5 11 Foil Face (Unslit) 3.5 12 Foil Face (Unslit) 2.5 13. Foil Face (Unslit) 2.5 Flame Spread Index 15.4 15.4 15.4 15.4 17.2 15.4 15.4 17.4. 17.2 16.8. 16.2 13.6 12.1 Smoke Developed Index The . smoke developed during the test is indicated by the output of a photoelectric circuit operating across the furnace flue. pipe. A curve is developed by plotting values of light absorption (decreased in cell output) against time.. The calculated value for Smoke Developed Index is derived by expressing the net area under the curve for this material as a percentage of the net area under the curve for untreated red oak. File R927 Test No. Page T1 -4 Issued: 2-18-87 Smoke Developed Description Index 1 Core 11.3 2 Core 15.9 3 Core 11.0 4 Fiberglass.Face (Slit) 35.5 5 Fiberglass Face (Slit) 53.2 6 Fiberglass Face (Slit) 35.2 7 Fiberglass Face (Unslit) 16.5 8 Foil Face (Slit) 110.1 9 Foil Face (Slit) 100.0 10 Foil Face (Slit) 85.6 11' Foil Face (Unslit) 176.2 12 Foil Face (Unslit) 121.1 13 Foil Face (Unslit) 126.0 File R927 Page Cl C O N C L U S I O N 1 Issued: 2 -18 -87 The following conclusions represent the judgement of' Underwriters Laboratories Inc. based upon the results of an examination of tests presented in this Report as they relate to established principles in previously recorded data. SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARY: The following Surface Burning Characteristics were established: SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS Core Finished Product Material Foil Surface Fiberglass Surface FLAME SPREAD 15 15 SMOKE DEVELOPED 15 120 -175 15 40 FOLLOW -UP PROGRAM: The product covered by this Report will be placed under the Follow -Up Service Program of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. The Classification Marking of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. attached to the product will be evidence that such product has been produced under the Follow -Up Service Program. Such Classification Marking will bear the Surface Burning Characteristics as shown below: 1• RB /RNW:ist lbry. FEB pCiirniM 871987 EVERGREEN STATE CONST. INC. File R927 Page C2 • UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. Issued: 2 -18 -87 CLASSIFIED FOAMED PLASTIC SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS Core Finished Product Material Foil Sur ace F berg ass Surface. FLAME SPREAD . 15 15 :SMOKE DEVELOPED 15 120 -175 Report by: ROBERT BACKSTROM Senior Engineering Assistant Fire Protection Department Reviewed by: 15 40 .L.dt.e,dit: )2, e4e.4ce.4_. RICHARD N. WALKE Engineering Group Leader Fire Protection Department i CeiainTeed El ASTM Test Methods & Specifications (condensed) CetainTeed El ASTM E 96 Standard Test Methods for WATER VAPOR TRANSMISSION OF MATERIALS IN SHEET FORM (Procedure E only) Purpose: To determine the rate of water vapor trans- mission (WVT) through a jacket or facing material (perm rating). General Information: There are six test procedures described in E 96, each having different test conditions. Method E specifically measures WVT in test conditions of high temperature, low humidity on one side of the sheet and high humidity on the other side. Rate of water vapor movement is calculated by weight gain in this method. Apparatus: An open -mouth dish is needed to hold a desiccant. A test chamber must have controlled tem- perature, humidity and continuous air circulation at a velocity sufficient to maintain uniform conditions in the chamber. Weights and an analytical balance are used for measurement purposes inside the test chamber. Method: Place the desiccant in the dish and attach the test specimen across the opening. A seal should be made with a substance which does not transmit water vapor such as wax (Fig. 12). Weigh the assembly and put it into the test chamber maintaining 37.8C and 90% relative humidity. Weighings are taken successively until a constant rate of weight gain is observed. Plot the weights against time intervals to find the rate of water vapor transmission. Record vapor pressure differences. As in previous test methods, several specimens should be tested, and the perm rating calcu- lated. Use: This test method is necessary for faced Duct Wrap, IB Board and jacketed Pipe Insulation, FIG. 12 WATER VAPOR TRANSMISSION Vapor Barrier Controlled Specimen Sealing Ring Humidity Cabinet Test Dish with Water "Stanclarcl'Tet' Met hod for SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS OF BUILDING MATERIALS Purpose: To measure and describe the properties of an insulating material in response to heat and flame in a fire test chamber. General Information: In this test, surface burning characteristics to be identified are flame spread classifi- cation (FSC), fuel contribution and smoke developed. No standard correlation exists between these three characteristics, however. The performance of the material during the test should not be considered a determination of the prod- uct's suitability for use after the test. Standard values, by which performance is compared, are assigned a numerical 0 for asbestos - cement board and 100 for a select grade of red oak flooring for all three characteristics. Apparatus: The 25' test tunnel apparatus consists of: a horizontal, rectangular duct with observation windows along one sidewall; a non - combustible removable top and an interior lining of firebrick. Several firebricks are positioned to act as baffles along the interior walls to facilitate proper combustion. A gas burner (flame source) is positioned one foot from the "fire end" of the tunnel in front of the air intake. A fan at the opposite end of the tunnel ( "vent end "), forces a draft through the apparatus at a specified velocity. Equipment needed to measure smoke density con- sists of a light source and photoelectrical cell sensitive to the amount of light received. Both are positioned at the vent end. Thermocouples measure temperature indicat- ing the fuel contribution of the specimen (Fig. 13). (Next Page) Method: The test chamber room must be properly ventilated so that the atmospheric pressure outside the apparatus is maintained during the test. Test specimens of prescribed dimensions are con- ditioned to a constant weight. The test apparatus is calibrated, adjusted and pre- tested using oak and asbestos cement board as test samples. Results are plotted for flame spread distance, temperature (fuel contribution) and photoelectric cell readings indicating smoke density. Place the test specimen (building material) in a cali- brated test tunnel and run the 10 minute test using the same procedure as with the oak and asbestos samples. Plot the results graphically in a manner similar to the pre- tests. 12 ., ASTM Test Mk‘.iods & Specifications (condensed) 'ASW: sA14': (Cor tiOS* Use: Required test method for Standard Specification C 612. Comment: :This . test . method .. is, not .very.. effective in : :predicting ,fire hazards,:and it is not. at all effective:.for ,: determining�fuel .contribution or smoke.density • How- ever; it:is krecognized and widely. quoted "standard" for; insulations and other building materials. FIG. 13 E 84 TUNNEL Test Specimen Topped with Asbestos r Cement Board Remov Suction Fan Vision Ports Flame Pipe FIG. 14 FLOOR AND ROOF TEST ASSEMBLY 13 Large Furnace ASTM E 119 Standard Methods of FIRE TESTS OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS Purpose: To determine the fire resistance of as- semblies of masonry units and composite assemblies of structural materials for buildings under controlled fire conditions. General Information: Fire resistance is expressed in hours. It is the length of time the assembly will contain a fire or retain its structural integrity (Fig. 14). If a six -hour fire resistance is required, the testing time is six hours. Three -hour fire resistance requires a three -hour test period; therefore the time exposure of the test is pre- determined by the fire resistance requirement. This test does not cover noncombustibility, flame spread, fuel contribution or smoke density. Results of the test should only be used to describe and measure fire - resistive properties in each specific test and is not to be used as an indication of per- formance or suitability under actual fire conditions. Method: E 119 describes individual methods for test- ing: 1) bearing walls and partitions, 2) nonbearing walls and partitions, 3) columns, plus an alternative test of protection for structural steel columns, 4) floors and roofs, and 5) loaded restrained beams with an alterna- tive classification procedure for loaded beams and an alternative test of protection for solid, structural steel beams and girders. The test methods for bearing walls and partitions (1) and floors and roofs (4) are most applicable to CertainTeed insulation products. In addi- tion to fire exposure, certain types of assemblies are also subjected to a specified standard fire hose stream. Each laboratory test is concerned with the measure- ment of heat transmission through the assembly, measurement of the transmission of hot gases and the measurement of the structure's load- carrying ability. Use: These test methods, involving insulation in these various configurations, are becoming increasingly im- portant. CertainTeed air handling and wall and panel insulation products are those most affected. Comment: It is a very costly test procedure. RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES EErl ARCHITECTS & LAND PLANNERS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION PRINCIPALS: RODERICK G. PARR JERRY A. RUHL A.I.A. February 24, 1987 Mr, Ed Kornahrens, P.E. Building & Systems Engineer Genuine Parts Company 2999 Circle 75 Parkway Atlanta, GA. 30339 RE: Installed Vapor Barrier; Rigid Foam Insulation S. P. Richards Company Office and Warehouse 1100 Andover Park West Tukwila, WA. Ed: As you have requested, we have reviewed for Code compliance the foil- scrim -Kraft material installed as a vapor barrier over fiberglass batt insulation in the above referenced project. The material used is "Lamotite 2835M" foil- scrim- Kraft as shown on the attached Product Data Sheet and actual label (removed from product on site). Based on the information furnished, this material appears to comply with Section 1713(c) of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), 1985 edition, and UBC Standard 42 -1. It should be acceptable to your project as installed. The rigid foam insulation as installed inside the warehouse does not conform to Section 1712(a) of the U.B.C. To comply you must install a "thermal barrier having an index of 15 when tested in accordance with U.B.C. Standard No. 17 -3." To accomplish this, we recommend you install 1/2 gypsum wallboard over metal studs (or furring channels) at 24" o.c. This assembly will then comply with the Code. NEWPORT CORPORATE CENTER • 3625 132ND AVE. S.E., SUITE 220 • BELLEVUE, WA 98006 -1399 • (206) 644 -4000 11; If you should have any further questions regarding this . material or its installation, please' do not hesitate to call me. Cordially, PARR. &' .ASSOC,IAT S e may . Fllth1, A.I. A. PO' cip- J i•j at ac ment • ccs: Mr. Duane Griffin, City of Tukwila Mr. Jim Norman, Evergreen State Construction 4 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Classification ISM .4 VaOotittrr maboatfotitrt CLASSIFItD �\ SHEATHIN,G�II AL SUkFAC RM A 1}$ARACTERI8TICS Bets or untrssled Red Oak) • Smell • OwOwasso' } FOIL•SCRIM•KRAFT (Kraft Side Exposed) 25 0 (Foil Side Exposed) -S ;,,•,.. 0, , MATERIALS EMPLOYED Aluminum Foil Scrim Adhesive Paper PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Basis Weight Water Resistance Permeability (MVTR) (ASTM E 96) Dry Cup, Proc. A. Corrosion Resistance Cold Weather Flexibility Temperature Resistance Bond Mullen Bursting Strength (ASTM D -774) Puncture Resistance —Beach (ASTM D -781) i.amotite Inc. 2909 E.79th St., Cleveland, Ohlo 44104. Phone: 218/883.8484 Telex: 98.0591 PRODUCT DATA SHEET T.M. LAMOTITE 2835M FOIL /SCRIM /KRAFT U.S. Conversion .00035" Tri•directional Fiberglass Yarn Reinforcement 2 x 3 High Performance Type 30 Lb. Natural Kraft 18.7 Lbs. /MSFt7% Withstands 1 hour H2O immersion at 70°F without delamination. .03 Perms @ 120°F and 95% relative humidity for 30 days —None Good The laminate withstands 24 hours @ 150 °F without delamination. Fiber Tearing 40 P.S.I. 35 Units Tensile Strength Tensile Lb. /In. C.D. 20 (ASTM D•828) Tensile Lb. /In. M.D. 40 Metric Conversion 9 Microns Tri- directional Fiberglass Yarn Reinforcement 0.8 x 1.2 High Performance Type 48.85 gr /m2 Natural Kraft 91.3 gr /m2t7% Withstands 1 hour H2O Immersion at 70 °F without delamination. .020 Perms @ 49 °C and 95% relative humidity for 30 days —None Good The laminate withstands 24 hours @ 66 °C without delamination. Fiber Tearing 2.8 kg /cm2 10.68 cm/kg 3.57 kglcm 7.14 kglcm Notes: 1. Since application of the materials and conditions of use are impor- tant factors In obtaining satisfactory results and are beyond our control, Lamotite can make no warranties, expressed or implied, including war- ranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, with re- spect to the material or its use or performance. CLAMOTITE 2. The statements regarding the characteristics, properties and perfor- mance of the materials described herein are based on data believed reliable, but no guarantee of their accuracy is made and such state- ments should not be construed as warranties or as the basis therefore. LI1184.2835 "4 .40,,‘...,;a1,, • Kr1 ;34! •"`"'" • ...mai FOIL / SCRIM KRAFT 2835M UL FIRE HAZARD RATING : h Flame Smote sejd Oevelood IMIKII SKR. ipsil-1411 pri Ezposedl 25 0 (Foil SKI. SEE U L CLASSIFICATION MARK 1 ON PRODUCT Elposedl 5 0 Lilarnotite T M Inc. 2909 E 19Ih SI Cleveland Ohio 44104 216/883-8484 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Classification • ,oaeoedtees ®aboratorie4 CLASSIFIED SHEATHIN S FA IR AL ARACTERISTICS or untreated Red Oak) P. F4ms T. 6moln :; Same' a,vs o$d; FOIL- SCRIM•KRAFT (Kraft Side Exposed) 25 "i,,(FOII8id.Expowdl ;it ii? 0 MATERIALS EMPLOYED Aluminum Foil Scrim Adhesive Paper PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Basis Weight Water Resistance Permeability (MVTR) (ASTM E 96) Dry Cup, Proc. A. Corrosion Resistance Cold Weather Flexibility Temperature Resistance Bond Mullen Bursting Strength (ASTM D -774) Puncture Resistance —Beach (ASTM D -781) Tensile Strength (ASTM D -828) Tensile Lb. /In. M.D. 40 2909 E.79th Lamotite Inc. St., Cleveland, Ohio 44104, Phone: 218/883.8484 Telex: 98 -0591 PRODUCT DATA SHEET T.M. LAMOTITE 2835M FOIL /SCRIM /KRAFT U.S. Conversion .00035" Tri - directional Fiberglass Yarn Reinforcement 2 x 3 High Performance Type 30 Lb. Natural Kraft 18.7 Lbs. /MSFt7% Withstands 1 hour H2O immersion at 70°F without delamination. .03 Perms @ 120 °F and 95% relative humidity for 30 days —None Good The laminate withstands 24 hours • 150 °F without delamination. Fiber Tearing 40 P.S.I. 35 Units Tensile Lb. /In. C.D. 20 Metric Conversion 9 Microns Tri- directional Fiberglass Yarn Reinforcement 0.8 x 1.2 High Performance Type 48.85 gr /m2 Natural Kraft 91.3 gr /m217% Withstands 1 hour H2O immersion at 70 °F without delamination. .020 Perms @ 49 °C and 95% relative humidity for 30 days —None Good The laminate withstands 24 hours I@ 66 °C without delamination. Fiber Tearing 2.8 kg /cm2 10.68 cm /kg 3.57 kg /cm 7.14 kg /cm Notes: 1. Since application of the materials and conditions of use are impor- tant factors in obtaining satisfactory results and are beyond our control, Lamotite can make no warranties, expressed or Implied, including war- ranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, with re- spect to the material or Its use or performance. 01. AMOT ITE 2. The statements regarding the characteristics, properties and perfor- mance of the materials described herein are based on data believed reliable, but no guarantee of their accuracy is made and such state- ments should not be construed as warranties or as tho basis therefore, U1184.2835 c)6} 29Co 2.. c SA- kaCLF\RA R•3613 UNDERWRITERS L ORATORIES INC m CLASSIFY I-1 A ti 5 AJ SHEATHING 'MATERIAL Contents Not Over 5,000 Sq. Ft. Issue No. 1425 SURFACE BURNING CHARACTERISTICS Mame Smoke FOIL - SCRIM -KRAFT (Kraft Side Exposed) 25 0 (Foil Side Exposed) s 0 rit • rr .nt ••c n i FOIL I SCRIM I KRAFT 2835M UL FIRE HAZARD RATING Flame Smoke Spud De.eloped Ilion awe Exposed) 25 0 )Fad Side Exposed) 5 0 SEE U.L CLASSIFICATION MARK ON PRODUCT tilarnotite T,M. Inc, 2909 E. 79th St , Cleveland. Ohio 44104 RE: P ' ; hoe �5 CCU PERSON CONTACTED: PERSON CALLING: DATE: TELEPHONE MEMO 1(4 /.'N PrriVe (,GtPJ»4- INFORMATION ITEMS: lkccf do (Toe. /)uc-c$ (i9rt.)41"ied - /yy - Woo ) /9 Ne, u,e f fed tt-rt tv ri-e frac) Q h ou C'trAr -i e d,'cm.9 7S ite ) CcoK /d 4P c WM'As2 Lv (`l111 I�'1 -€ .Cie /44 o Li-44 hea o`eci 4 )t & (ArtAtit. ogil 4-40 4e)4‘ 406(.14 /-v) 1 ea -Yp t_d wa 1/6 }-c� pki4 1•o efyic to4-P, 4_ i w -5t4(4 gat' Q -''& CJrVI o,L,o e5 h /1M i'4ou7' Y -uew 11,114/1.11t3-11 4 'y'te ,L/I4 c. /fp etc Q0,11 it e 14e c. 1+ ,ec! r detie . _ -0 0 0 I r . !. i 0CLt1 W- 140 ° sie)71toe -v( . .0)//q/q7 Ikpel It) Ry tk 0- cc pc/ s- k•201;s, MPS )0714 ) 256 oYO O /7 2 SCE, ho wo u (d h /C-14 1 r .,nee -,e 43 5- 1p4c1'LV) ! Qa/cs 4.,4 cMc.e_ ce►'1'�� GlneoL OlrcjuZr-s? del-a show,lig ✓tL Will gu p p'): }- Me., /9/ Me vid, oho oc i ke C emepu ler room. M.2 tit Cartttra.d&- sa(cl ham, Would Py vide �rne. wr'�k %lids, a . Need. rex 6*.e d e tom 5 .J: )1 date. c 2 truck, Lott( T. 1%. iiod- i'ticdtc_. /Cues 1), o e eft f-e)^ f A (,5 be (till " us.e� > 4,, - p i dL4 . 1 c / ela Ile o't- d weGHem , 3, B1d3 1era.0-f� J�S�(a!(Qhteyl. 7i5' t.4 erArn 411 tic Iuded &r ?: P.e ..,c'd- &bou buf how iijaue 4h /_s ( .zi d 4-pote ' . o (11 u let) 1'4,31 , Foa. -nt. 7 %L ru ta3; i o-� h Qs ■1 j ��e c � u-e)t f �A Y 7l?4, bfirrl'eY. C % e-143 ,a( a.) U$e. A h rs — 2‘44-519 uv� 45,20. Yc k - Flui A5 6' e Orin MICG 1/9 N: Ka114,14CLY bay s QN60140Ce'n p-(1 3, t „0, ee � d i 4 caTi6�'t q 4eiedJ -7),B0 retAe4.4:2661)) CITY OF TUKWIL* ro2 Division BUS" . 'NG PERMIT APPLIC T'(JN 0200 Sou 0 Southcentlr Boulevard , Tukwila, Washington 98188 . '1106) 433 -1845 Site Address 1100 Andover Park West Project Name /Tenant S. P. Richards Co. Valuation of Construction $15,000 Assessors Account# Property Owner C Y Enterprises (Howard Wong) Control # g7-Q,`j 6.) Suite# Floor# Address 227 E. Georgia St., Vancouver B.C., Lanada Applicant s. P. Richards Address 1100 Andover Park West, Tukwila, WA. Architect /Engineer Roderick G. Parr & Assoc. Address 3625 132nd Ave. S.E., Suite 220, Bellevue, WA Phone(604) 685 -8264 Zipv6A1z6 Phone 575 -8108 Zip 98188 Phone 644 -4000 Zip 98006 Contractor Evergreen State Construction License# Ever -G1 *232 DC Phone 255 -0400 Address 900 SW 16th, BAatpn_�WA Zip 98055 Class of Work: ❑ New ❑ Addition Q Tenant Improvement ❑ Remodel (residential) ❑ Reroof ❑ Demolition ❑ Interior Demolition ❑ Other Describe work to be done Remove interior office partitions, enlarge mens restroom, replace carpeting & enclose loading dock. Type of Const. (UBC) Occ. Group (UBC) Square footage of entire building 135,000 Square footage of tenant space 40,000 Building Use Office /Warehouse Will there be a change of use? ❑ Yes Q No If yes, describe change of use, including square footages of changed areas Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on the premise or area of construction? ❑ Yes Q No If yes, explain I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EX CORRECT AND THAT I HAVE THE PROPERTY OW Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature)i (print name) Ray Y Contact Person (please print) Ray Young NED THIS APP R'S LITHO Z' I0 ATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND TO DO THIS ORK. Date Phone 255 -0400 OFFICE USE ONLY FEES: Building Permit Fee (000/322.100) $ /(G'% ,CO Plan Check Fee (000/345.830) • (O' Y. c'O Bldg Code Sur Charge (000/386.904) 1.50 Energy Sur Charge* (000/386.907) Other ( ) *New construction only TOTAL ti Receipt# 5-79/ Receipt# X76( / Receipt# Receipt# Receipt# Date Paid Date Paid,' Date Paid Date Paid Date Paid ZL_S. SC (OWES: $ (&(7). 50 ) i SQJARE FOOTAGE /BUILDING USE INFORMATION F Square Foot f Entir B.i din•• OCC LOOR USE /Occ Type SQ.FT. j,0AD USE /Occ Type SQ.FT. LOAD ‘72,2.51-k- USE /Occ Tvoe SQ.FT. roan 1 47111a, -z .�9 to � C9-q) GtinLGIl -ne.s� / j(o 0 aoAss 3/ �'Oh'h410ri /S/ SQ.FT. OCC. 33 1c �-9 -.a L 1 DEPT DATE IN DATE OUT FIRE COMMENTS pprove or ssuance To Mahan: Type of Const. s) ;Date Approved: JJ '�.3" Per letter dated �� "% 4 prink ers O Detectors ( = /y) 7c(/1 Approved (Initials) c1 / Fire Protection: PLNG A pprove Zoning Setbacks: N Parking stalls required for: Site Parking stalls provided: Site ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: d (Initials) O BAR OLAND USr /SEIsA CONDITIONS S E W Tenant Space Tenant Space PWD Approved (Initials) Per letter /plans dated Evergreen State Construction, Inc. Jim ,k/o, 2tWAN - Pda . RAYMOND L. YOUNG Vice-President P.O. Box 830 Renton, WA 98057 200 S.W,18th Renton, WA 98055 (208) 2550400 rjTY OF TUKWILA fwildin 0200 Southcentern8oulevard BUIL t 'NG PERMIT APPLIC:' ' )N 37-05-6) Tukwila, Washington 98188 } Control # (i!06) 433 -1845 Site Address 1100 Andover Park West Suite# Floor# Project Name /Tenant S. P. Richards Co. Valuation of Construction -4 5 --889 ;1C00 Assessors Account# Property Owner C Y Enterprises (Howard Wong) Phone(604) 685 -8264 Address 227 E._ Georgia St., VancouverB.C., Lanada Zip V6A1Z6 Applicant S. P. Richards Phone 575 -8108 Address 1100 Andover Park West, Tukwila, WA. Zip 98188 Architect /EngineerRorlerj�k Pa c A o. Phone 644 -4000 Address 3625 132nd Ave. S.E., Suite 220, Bellevue, WA Zip 98006 Contractor Evergreen State Construction License# Ever- G1 *232 DC Phone 255 -0400 Address 900 g W 1hth, Rr-+nt-nn,WA Zip 98055 Class of Work: [] New El Addition © Tenant Improvement j Remodel (residential) D Reroof D Demolition E] Interior Demolition D Other Describe work to be done Remove interior office partitions, enlarge mens restroom, replace carpeting & enclose loading dock 1 124St-.c 10,/ K ,x,/0 10015 Type of Const. (UBC) Occ. Group (UBC) Square footage of entire building 135,000 Square footage of tenant space 40,000 Building Use Office/Warehouse Will there be a change of use? D Yes M No If yes, describe change of use, including square footages of changed areas Will there be storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on the premise or area of construction? [] Yes No If yes, explain I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EX CORRECT AND THAT I HAVE THE PROPERTY OW Applicant /Authorized Agent (signature) (print name) Ray Y Contact Person (please print) Ray Young THIS APP ATION AND KNO THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND UTHO Z' I0 TO DO THIS ORK. Date Phone 255 -0400 OFFICE USE ONLY FEES: Building Permit Fee (000/322.100) $ L:;a9- Receipt # -- G-t-' Date Paid Plan Check Fee (000/345.830) -1-U.4,-G0 Receipt# 77C(/ Date Paid 7 +, Bldg Code Sur Charge (000/386.904) -15:50= Receipt# Date Paid Energy Sur Charge* (000/386.907) Receipt# Date Paid Other ( ) Receipt# Date Paid *New construction only TOTAL =`l (OWES: $ /(.r- ) ect b it (-2��iA SQUARE FOOTAGE /BUILDING USE INFORMATION S.uare,Foota•e sf Entir- + }) B ildin••�� �' 7 . �j / FLOO'. USE /Occ Typ: SQ.FT. LOAD USE /Occ Type SQ.FT. • LOAD USE /Occ TVD: SO.FT. OCC InAn $ 'L SOFT. +L OCC. U ii TRACKING • • • s' •' 11 OMMENT BLDG ✓ / ' at i pprove or ssuance '; Type of Const. To Mahan: •a1! As'roved: F RE .\q'�) c,,1 - i-;'„ Approved (Initials ), I i , Per letter dated 2,- 2-C�'�. / Fire Protection{ ?, inklers ❑Detectors Approved (Initials) p BAR OLAND /SEPA CONDITIONS PLNG Zoning Setbacks: N S E W Parking stalls required for: Site Tenant Space Parking stalls provided: Site Tenant Space ADDITIONAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED: PWD � Approved (Initials) Per letter /plans dated • 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION laglignelleafiaaNstaimilialMBSNI 1111•11111N10. PROJECT DATA T M!NKLER BLVD. 1 ..•.sH 4- A UNDER THIS PERMIT r•• • ANDOVER • • • • 4 I 11 SITE PLAN '34AL-f, 1" % Cecil 1141 •• • r "• • • • • • JOTt X WTI r�r� GI�I�I�GY� NYC hI�► "� I44i•JGe MDN f /O OIL I-1 1461fn Oxc P1 kr•rA " .1ti' F' MST' That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 35 and the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East W.l1,, in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1 of Section 35; thence North 87'44'08” West along the North line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 949.49 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 01'51'39" West a distance of 107.44 feet; thence North 88'08'21" West a distance of 333.00 feet to the West margin of Andover Park West; thence North 01' 51'39" East along said West margin of Andover Park West a diatanca of 109.79'feet; thence North 01'47'29" East along said West margin of Andover Park West a distance of 634.01 feet to the North line of Southcentei Industrial Park; thence South 88'12'31" East along said North line of Southcentsr Industrial Park a diatanca of 346.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 70'57'17" East, having a radius of 300.00 feet, anarch distance of 90.34 feet; through a central angle of 17'15'14 "; thence South 01'47'29" West a distance of 547.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. AUTHORITY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ZONING OCCUPANCY SITE AREA BUILDING AREA PROJECT AREA (S.P. RICHARDS CO.) NO. OF PARKING PROJECT DATA: TRUCK WELL RESTROOM LUNCHROOM OFFICE SPACE COMPUTER ROOM WAREHOUSE TENANT VICINITY MAP CITY OF 1(JKWILA EXISTING (UNCHANGED) EXISTING (MINCED) EXISTING (UNG WFNGED) EXISTING (UNCHANGED) 117,000 SQ.FT.± EXISTING (UtrCHAWED) 36,075 SQ.FT.± EXISTING (UNCHANGED) EXISTING (UNCHA\'GED) 1950 SQ.FT. EXISTING) 242 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 275 SQ.FT. (NEW) 170 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 144.5 SQ. FT. (Niel) 2561.5 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 273 SQ.FT. (EXISTING REMOVED) 196 SQ.FT. (NEW) 30,675 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 30,948 SQ.FT. (NEW) S.P. RICHARDS COMPANY 1100 ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA, WA 98188 • t. LAKE RIDGE •.un twirl )11B R:j..i� K w SCAM :::f 7,,,, ♦ 'Zan; !Ael C40 BRYN MAWR .. f,e.* A..• EARLINGTO 1 MCMICKEM SW 3,010 1? 1111d r,k�m. FILE COflr' I understand that the ;7'1:T1 C I•.:I.t; c 'provals are. suojEet :o e.-roes antic �.+ oval cf plan:, does ^:::i calf ved pla; :, g iewieoged. By F'er!r't 'r.o 6 /987 j t 0 ,1 f- f) rrR 2 61987 u1i_I)IN( DIV!SV N THESE DRAWINGS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY OF RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES, P.S., INC. OFFICE RENOVATION FOR 5 P RICHARDS CO. 1100 ANDOVER PARK WEST 7UKWfLA, WA N.C.A.R.B. REG. NO. 10,672 WASHINGTON TL 572 OREGON 561 CALIFORNIA C 6864 IDAHO AR 796 MONTANA 657 NEVADA 742 COLORADO C 1098 WYOMING C 911 ALASKA 3805 -A HAWAII 5378 DRAWN 'BY: r• 109- RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES D) A PPOFFSSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION d ARCHITECTS & LAND PLANNERS NL L. SHEET NO. 3625 132ND AVE. S.E., SUITE 220 • BELLEVUE, WA. 98006-1399 • (208) 644 -4000 6 CM IIIIII!1! IIIiIIIII HAM IIIIIII!I 8 9 19 11 1 13 14 15 II!I�Iltlllllllllll 11:111111)11111111 MIMI! IlIIlIIII InIIIIILIIlIIIIILIIIIIIIII I,IIIII!ILII111111I OF: 2 a CO N CO O L z CL MINKLER BLVD. • • et UNDER THIS PERMIT LEGAL DESCRIPTION That portion of Government Lot 1 of Section 35 and the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East W.M., in the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, described a,b follows; Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Government Lot 1 of Section 35; thence North 87'44'08" West along the North line of said Government Lot 1, a distance of 949.49 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 01.51'39" West a distance of 107.44 feet; thence North 88'08'21" West a distance of 333.00 feet to the West margin of Andover Park West; thence North 01' 51'39" East along said West margin of Andover Park West a distance of 109.79'feet; thence North 01'47'29" East along said West margin of Andover Park West a distance of 634.01 feet to the North line of Southcenter Industrial Park; thence South 88.12'31" East along said North line of Southcenter Industrial Park a distance of 346.50 feet; thence Southwesterly along a curve to the left, the center of which bears South 70'57'17" East, having a radius of 300.00 feet, anarch diatatce of 90.34 feet; through a cintral angle of 17'15'14 "; thence South 01'47'29" West a distance of 547.77 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington. AUTHORITY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ZONING OCCUPANCY SITE AREA BUILDING AREA PROJECT AREA (S.P. RICHARDS CO.) NO. OF PARKING PROJECT DATA: TRUCK WELL RESTROOM LUNCHROOM OFFICE SPACE CCMPU'FER ROOM WAREHOUSE TENANT w 4 CITY OF TUKWILA EXISTING (AGED) EXISTING (UNCHAED) EXISTING (UNC k ;ED) EXISTING (UNCHANGED) 117,000 SQ.FT,_ EXISTING (UNC}1J10ED) 36.075 SQ.FT.t. EXISTING (UNCHAED) EXISTING (UCWNGED) 1950 SQ.FT. EXISTING) 242 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 275 SQ. Fr. ANEW) 170 SQ. Fr. (EXIMTI%) 144.5 SQ. FT. (NCI) 2561.5 SQ. FT. (EXISTING) 273 SQ.FT. (F.XISTM REMOVED) 196 SQ.Fr. (NEW) 30,675 SQ.FT. (EXISTING) 30,948 SQ.FT. (!o) S.P. RICHARDS CCHI Y 1100 ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA, WA 98188 ' r I; 1 i % t r 'ROVED" E I) li-R ; 7 1997 10Lj ... VICINITY MAP =C.• ?.,l ` _\.... 1 .' • 04. ,p4 ' ry; ; • , • ,.J j7•• sx • 0000 ;1.0;2., • RAINIER BEACH ....• . 4• KENNYDALE .i t ... . , 1 • • OUN'AMISH'; is V- E;r p !!,,lit I LAKE RIDGE BRYN MAWR :•••••• e • • -46151M-r• KYWAY IJI s • �1 �i�� t. ; ARP la E r .••y • • _ I -' i " G:? i'r w� Nor At-1 iJ pp► r. K1t•1e 11�'I•�; f'�1f1 o IJ J eftg p ,x P•i" Ak ik 5A • w , A HEAD DETAIL va. HEAD DETAIL I iiiittijj I I SITE PLAN ,o c� (ARLINGTON A I�.611k Li 7 N THlsa�Ml1" . • 1. RIVERTON • ,•■• ,• £ • • < ;S S. r .2) * 011 ' DoW R b V! Vi'``i '�f•5T N E I ROLL —UP DOOR ELEVATION JAMB DETAIL /-1- II_ ;II� 1 J—THESE DRAWINGS AS IN PROPERTY OF RODERICK G. API,, 13 1987 1 01: TU KwILA MEN+ -bF -SERY1EE• /kRt N PARR & ASSOCIATES, P.S., INC., 8 0 OFFICE RENOVATION FOR P .RICHARDS CO. 1100 ANDOVER PARK WEST TUKWILA, WA N,C.A.R.B. REG. NO. 10,672 WASHINGTON TL 572 OREGON 561 CALIFORNIA C 6864 ' IDAHO AR 796 MONTANA 657 NEVADA 742 COLORADO C 1098 WYOMING C 911 ALASKA 3805 -A HAWAII 5378 1 ©C- LL RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & LAND PLANNERS A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION 3625 132ND AVE. S.E., SUITE 220 • BELLEVUE, WA. 98006-1399 • (2061644.4000 DRAWN BY: NLL DATE: CMI1I(1 WWI 11111111) 11114111 I I I IIIIII I�r`�Ilnl IIIIIIIII IIII�IIII 11111111/ IIIIIII/ 11111111111 IIII�IIII�IIIIIIIII IIII�III! HUM 11 FLOOR PLAN WALL GaNt vapor WOOL THESE DRAWINGS AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE ARE THE PROPERTY 0¢ RODERICK G. PARR & ASSUCIAW. P.$., INC,. 1 REVISIONS WASHING OREGON 581 CALIFORNIA C 6864 IDAHO AR 796 MONTANA 657 NEVADA 142 COLORADO C 1098 WYOMING C 911 ALASKA 3035 -A HAWAII 5378 RODERICK G. PARR & ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & LAND PLANNERS 5` A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION DRAWN BY NFL 3625 132ND AVE. S.E., SUItE 220 • BELLEVUE, WA. 98006-1399 • (206) 644.4000