Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 89-02-A - CITY OF TUKWILA - CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION89-02-a military road south highway 99 south 152nd street south 116th street 89-02-cpa epic-32-88 mf 89-03-r CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO /51f AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1S80, ADOPTING KING COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, AMENDING SECTION 1 TO INCLUDE SIGNAGE AND AMENDING SECTION 3 TO INCLUDE "APPROVE AND INSPECT SIGN PERMITS." WHEREAS, prior to the effective date of annexation, a sign permit application was filed with King County for processing under King County development regulations, and the permit was not completely processed by King County before the date the annexation area became part of the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, King County currently has no jurisdiction to continue processing a sign permit, and it is necessary for the protection of the public health and safety for this situation to be rectified immediately. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Development Regulations. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1580 is hereby amended to read as follows: The City of Tukwila adopts King County's development regulations for the permits identified in amended Attachment A to this Ordinance. King County's development regulations include the King County road standards, road adequacy standards, and grading ordinance; King County's general provisions for loading areas and off - street parking; King County's general provisions for signage, landscaping and screening; the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Fire Code as modified by King County; the enforcement provisions of Title 23 of the King County Code; and the development permit fees of Title 27 of the King County Code. Section 2. Review Process. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1580 is hereby amended to read as follows: King County is authorized to be the agent for the City of Tukwila to review, approve, inspect, finalize and issue certificates of occupancy for the building permits, approve and inspect sign permits, and approvals for short plats described in Attachment A. Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after publication of the attached summary which is hereby approved. • C. /1 L < L- 1 � / / e E. C antu, City Cl erk PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF _, (ITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this /'r y of 1990. a 1990. G an usen, ayor ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; PUBLISHED: /e° - -4/•-• EFFECTIVE DATE: i _ - �/ U ORDINANCE NO.: , , k I PARCEL # ACT # 0040001025 C9002285 .1623049001 C900476 1 3049264 C9000013 1523049199 S89S0202 7346600216 S89S0161 8864000175 S9006767 735500435 88904004 04100035 C90002693 STATUS TITLE Pending Approved Pending PENDING APPLICATIONS IN THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA Seattle Cult. Ctr. Adult psych. /educ. Addition to funeral home Preliminary Schmnutz, RJ approval 2 Lot SP Prelim. appr. Grosso, William 2 lot SP Pending Pending Approved Lot 14, Blk 2, Val -Vue Ado See R8904004 for legal description Val -Vue Ado Free Standing Sign DESCRIPTION Church Facility . 03438 S. 148 St. fire alarm/ sprinkler sys. Tenant improvement Short plat, single family lots, meets lot size stds. Short plat single family Travelodge ADDRESS 1800 sq.ft. added 3400 S. 140th SEPA,Cond. Use, Variance issued N/A N/A A[TACHMENI A Nichiren Shoshu Soka Cakkai APPLICANT 12844 Military Rd S Highline Community Coll. Uniservice Corp. Pac Tech Eng. Grosso, William 13527 35th Ave S Martin, Paul 13022 32nd Ave S Looney, William 14845 Pacific Highway S. Travelodge AMENDED 10/11/90. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1580, ADOPTING KING COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, AMENDING SECTION 1 TO INCLUDE SIGNAGE AND AMENDING SECTION 3 TO INCLUDE "APPROVE AND INSPECT SIGN PERMITS." On - the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance Noy' 5 amending cti • ns 1 and 3 of Ord. #1580 which adopted King County Development Regulations for specific permit applications for the Cascade View Annexation area; providing for Severability; and establishing an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City. Council at its meeting of /C1/0 . PUBLISHED: VALLEY DAILY NEWS - OCTOBER 21, 1990 ktec� e E. Cantu, City erk CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. / S $ D AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING KING COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, AND AUTHORIZING KING COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO REVIEW, APPROVE, INSPECT AND FINAL THOSE BUILDING PERMITS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the Cascade View annexation, with the proposed City of Tukwila zoning and land use regulations, was approved by the voters in an election held pursuant to King County regulations, and WHEREAS, the County Canvassing Board has submitted Statements of Canvass to the King County Council, and the King County Council entered its findings with regard thereto, WHEREAS, Cascade View became part of the City of Tukwila on September 1, 1990, pursuant to an ordinance adopted by the City Council, and WHEREAS, prior to the effective date of annexation, building permit applications were filed with King County for processing under King County development regulations, and those permits were not completely processed by King County before the date the annexation area became part of the City of Tukwila, WHEREAS, the attached list of permit applications (Attachment A) substantially conform to the zoning and land use regulations approved by the voters of the annexation, and have been substantially processed by King County staff, and WHEREAS, King County currently has no jurisdiction to continue processing such permits, and it is necessary for the protection of the public health and safety for this situation to be rectified immediately, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA., WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Development Regulations. The City of Tukwila adopts King County's development regulations for the permits identified in Attachment A to this Ordinance. King County's development regulations include the King County road standards, road adequacy standards, and grading ordinance; King County's general provisions for loading areas and off - street parking; King County's general provisions for landscaping and screening; the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Fire Code as modified by King County; the enforcement provisions of Title 23 of the King County Code; and the development permit fees of Title 27 of the King County Code. Section 2. Amendments to Attachment A. Only those permit applications filed before September 1, 1990 and inadvertently not included in Attachment A (Pending Applications in the Cascade View Annexation Area), or those ancillary permits necessary for the completion of projects listed on Attachment A, can, under these conditions, be added to Attachment A by mutual agreement of the Manager of King County Building and Land Development Division and the Tukwila Community Development Director. Section 3. Review Process. King County is authorized to be the agent for the City of Tukwila to review, approve, inspect, finalize and issue certificates of occupancy for the building permits and approvals for short plats described in Attachment A. Section 4. Emergency Declared. An emergency exists in that the outstanding permits described in Attachment A cannot be reviewed until the effective date of this ordinance, thus creating a threat to the public health, safety, property and peace. C Section 5. Sunset Provision. As each of the permits described on Attachment A is completed through issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, this ordinance shall become null and void as to such permit. Section 6. Interlocal Agreement. The Mayor is authorized to execute an interlocal agreement with King County to implement the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect as of the date the interlocal agreement is approved by Tukwila and King County. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF JIM C OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this : y of , i , • 1990. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: q-- 11- (/e PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; — '('— 17- y o PUBLISHED: 7- Q') - 9'v EFFECTIVE DATE: '^ 1 7 ORDINANCE NO.: 1 5 $V an P usen, ayor PARCEL # ACT # 0040001025 C9002285 1623049001 C900476 1523049264 C9000013 1523049199 S89S0202 7346600216 S89S0161 8864000175 59006767 735600435 K8904004 STATUS Pending Approved Pending PENDING APPLICATIONS IN THE CASCADE Short plat, single family lots, meets lot size stds. Short plat single family lots, meets lot size stds. Detached Garage Note: built w/o permits Revision (adding basement, deck first floor) ADDRESS N/A N/A ATTACHMENT A Cakkai APPLICANT Nichiren Shoshu Soka Highline Community Hosp. Uniservice Corp. Pac Tech Eng. Grosso, William 13527 35th Ave S Martin, Paul 13022 32nd Ave S Looney, William SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING KING COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY. KNOWN AS THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, AND AUTHORIZING KING COUNTY TO CONTINUE TO REVIEW, APPROVE, INSPECT AND FINAL THOSE BUILDING PERMITS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. On c the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance No. 4574' adopting Kin C • unty Development Regulations for specific permit applications for the Cascade View Annexation area; authorizing King County to continue to review, approve, inspect and final those building permits; declaring an emergency; and establishing an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City. Council at its meeting of 9 - / 7- 96' . 4 1 1-2 tu ( 1 - Cityqtr -4- PUBLISHED: VALLEY DAILY NEWS - SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1990 •=5; 9109270297 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TiUKMIX, WS ISM CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO 1574 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWII.A, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, ADOPTING ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, PROVIDING THAT SAID ANNEXED AREA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME ANY SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila received a petition certified as sufficient by the King County Prosecuting Attorney, calling for an election to vote upon annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila determined that the signatures on the petition were sufficient and filed the Certificate of Sufficiency with the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 1112, passed September 5, 1989, approved the proposed Cascade View annexation area election - method annexation, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official for the City issued a Declaration of Non - Significance, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340, the City �.. Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 1539, providing for zoning and land use regulations for the N area to become effective upon annexation, and C::::) WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board approved the annexation in File No. 1622, dated January 11, 1990, and WHEREAS. pursuant to King County Council Ordinance No. 9347, an election was held in the area proposed for annexation on May 22, 1990, with the results of said election being that the voters approved annexation together with the proposed zoning and land use regulations and rejected assumption of the City's outstanding indebtedness. and WHEREAS, the County Canvassing Board will submit the Statement of Canvass to the King County Council, and the King County Council will enter its finding with regard thereto, and a certified copy of the minutes reflecting such entry will be transmitted, along with the certified abstract of the vote, to the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to annex the area proposed for annexation without requiring it to assume any portion of the City's existing indebtedness, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation. The real property known as the Cascade View Annexation Area, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and shown on Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila as of September 1, 1990, and shall thereafter be subject to the zoning and land use regulations as adopted in City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1539. Section 2. Assumption of Indebtedness. Pursuant to the results of the annexation election, the property within the territory annexed hereby shall not be required to assume through assessment or taxes, any indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, contracted prior to or existing as of the effective date of the annexation. Said property shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City to pay for any bonds issued or other debts contracted subsequent to the date of annexation. .0, Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five (5) days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY . THE CITY COUNCIL O THE ITY OF TUKWII.A, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof t ' /�' day o',, 1990. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APP ' OVED AS TO FORM: OFF E OF THE C ORNEY: FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: to - /9' 90 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL; . d - PUBLISHED: e 02 .2- 9.6` EFFECTIVE DATE: 4 - a 1, ORDINANCE NO.: /5 y 07 O G ice'' . ' • an • usen, ayor 0) south line of tax lot 092304 -9367; CASCADE VIEW ATTACHMENT A Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22. R4E, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west ii corner of said Section; thence North 18'28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an. intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88.11'04" West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the north margin of South 128th Street; thence east along said north margin to its intersection with the south line of the southeast quarter of Section 9, T23N, R4E, W.M; 'thence continuing east along said south line to a point of intersection with a line lying 250 feet (measured perpendicular to) westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South; thence northerly along said parallel line to the south line of the north 34 feet of the north ! of the south it of the south it of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence continuing northerly along said line which lies 250 feet westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South a distance of 5 feet more or less to a point located opposite station PT 527 + 88.4 on said road centerline; thence N12- 21 -28W a distance of 200.30 feet; (V © thence 588 -56 -5211 to point which lies 564.93 feet westerly of the west margin c of. Pacific Hwy South when measured along said line; Q7 . CD thence N 00- 05 -43E a distance of 483.93.feet more or less. to a point on the thence west to a point which lies 609.72 feet east of the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9 said point being the southeast corner of tax lot 092304 -9034; thence northerly to a point on the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 614.28 feet-east of the north- west corner thereof; .V„ HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • MEDIUM DENSITY o C\J C\J Cr) 07) c 7iT • '=". • • • !4'4V1 ■x • 4-" • LOW DENSITY " • RESIDENTIAL • :.•!,-.•-• , ;., • ' MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I ;•.•4 th,. , , .i , ..i•rft•'•ii •• • ';•'• 1 • 1 1 1 , .'.:.• , ..t . ,..1.,,..9.1,i1 - 1 -- .:; 1 % . ". ,.. , ... • • ...:-.1...r... RESIDENTIAL ,..:: • • .*: 0 1 : 7 7 f l l 4 4 v • t ( : ':.... ..-,, --, g'i 121' . 11 t C. Q• • ‘ ::• / .11V; •1 74, • . 12* .0 • a I ; - l'• 13 : • ° • .•°. 0 :.: 3 3 • b' • ^ g s i. • 1 . :A s k 0 • . :4 !..9-.1.:'ziA ..; ■!;..• -*"'' • .. 1 i €.: . vt % 7 .1 s? S ," . : IV '-' 9 : , 1 ..... L.N., LOW DENSITY 0 . • 4. : '4 - • i' • • . t. 3 , ,t• v. . 11:1 ilsi -.I/. ; • ; t q : {■ "• ..°Tigierk. c g, ■ `3 • - ;.. A 0 L. • il .,-. - .7" :. :54 • rilA160• • otmlief 'nip; u.". • I ni 1" • • p a • I 9) I . . • .....r." d•.: li. ‘I • • • .j ' ti lt)it 4 . • 2) . •: . • ;1 1 .^*‘, 4 ';g:'S. : ! ...., , ••1 .. % • . . •! ......1:3t0"171: ..I . 6.1.3" .. • .. • ,• e a r.,■ t" 1 " ' : . . ... • ls• '' . t, .., 1 .• . - 7 • • 5 4 6 . - 7 •-=-' ''.. -- .7 '' *J . .... .. ..iA, MEDIUM DIIIISITYI : 99.P =;\•.01••16 ••, , . i • '-', In q e ,,,11_ Ai • om •:„ ,.... E. !.... 1 , a, . ' : . . . 0 - 1; . 71_ 41 • . "11 r41 . 0. . 7: r• " "''.• • . •.: cr. J t a 140 ' 4 .. • ..• ... , - .Ei:U . • 1 . ■ 1y • - ; 0 ,, , ,,, . .... . •.■•:2.1•••OcI i:..- . c.1 _,, . • 1•::. ..g .r.! - ....II :, . J ,.,..s.....1:. ' ; r “ , „er " u-4,„,g., . ... -. ;bp rv.V. • • 61 " • '1 • • . ' . •• 3„.330 c:1 313 ci - . • : :MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • L r ° u - • • M • ••••' . 1 :1 4'. 4 :4 1 1: . : 6 ' _ • : • ' 1••••.:ei:3• • HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL r • r• ' •- r ". . ••• r fe\ • r • .:2 ' • •-% • , • ' • - 9 . . / • - * ' • • •-•• OU14_ • ▪ ;• • 44 I ) • • • •a• . ..., ....:.• • !:, . • : . • . ..... ..: • 1.. . a-1. ,.• . 1 • ' I • tri • . 1 • .. - . • l' I 33.3* '....*; ......? 31 .'„ •••• ..; ' . . . . .. '4,,. .g.7.:-'...P.:..'....::"'.ff. I: :=et . ..‘;......i , . .9...... • ...,.;...,---„, Li . ". •••• 4 . •1•••Iov'''''' ii '••••.!!!: r...). ors • ••• S..r4Tifff.44•%E.TP., ili;voult.', . ' 1 ......_. .:....',;•' gle.1•••••.-'r .......• , ..... I ova/di,: CMS/ . t . .1: 01;• 3 °.:• .* • ; Clot M. I4.3". ' I. . a , 1 ••.). j.: ,, ' ; . • .1 • ., , /03 * t . • 4 it.• • . *. • 0. .3 „., I oi'' ''. k 1--.. .• : '1 V ,*:! 1 . I:i' • ' .; I' • 9 ••'. -.•-•".• f I. , i , • PIt9 1 1 9 1* , 41e . ‘,.1........, ' ' IC 'ilit4z?,,' 'ca 99. 3•;. ?.-.3 9: 'op . ;Yea ° •••: - ; pi"' % ot _..............._ . __• . -.3-4-- -_-- G • ..i. • e t 0 3 .. . . 11 ! I , 4 I li ji • •• '.11 • • • • . 0.1 • P . : re." • 1 1 - 1 ; I I i .e .40 • f aig Ali r 4 .411. \ , • - - . ,. , "-•• 1.9.19' • ., .4 . 0 , i (1 • .411:1 [lc* CASCAD IE VIEW COSIPINDIENSIVIE PLAN • • 3 ' 'VI . • Y...3 , •' S ri: -• .‘t• 1, : il . .. - k \ . ..,.... ,,,.. .. • V,:p .. . • , t i • ' -- • ' . .' .. 1 ". . s . • 1 . t y_,f .. • ' • L''' ,..„,, -• • • " . - -: .- : t • • ji..1 i ... / I • - -" "- " . - ..:, • ' - 't:4 •,,, - • q i , .- ' ' .,„ „, !-•. • ,.• • i -.:; i, ., . . ,.. . i HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .. : --\ , . I • .: . \\*.• ..9•.! ■ . ! z • I • C-- -:--jr . \t • I \ • L. • ,. \ •i Vi \ \ 3 1 . \ LIGHT INDUSTRIAL . 0 : MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL I t lit' C h , * .4, • :** • .• LO'N DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL .:•.:11\ • .1 . HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL;....:, • s ..9 9: 1 • /I ' • • • •I • .j; .. O. .. %.• • 10. • 1 111U . „ P - . • • ''°• MO ° .. • ° HIGH DENSrTY RESIDENTIAL •••• a,.*Z111 COMMERCIAL \ 3 , • ••••• • j • r ? • "AVM 44 ' ; • a • ••• • • !:ia;;;IPO • . , . QI I I.. • MENT B COMMERCIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .s9v• IAIMDIUIA DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL HON DENSITY RESIDENTIA L.. kik/ r■Nt. L; e D AREA EXCLUDED FROM ANNEXATIO BY BRB cAscol AN •\4EXi4 sri o i3 g IA kt pkii t'. - !'■ ...et I ro Fr . • !--:---•';-' , tici 4 ...._;_.- di 1 : • '. r•7? o tiidt, 4 COI 4X:I . VN: ic.= b ig • j pr. r 8 - 6 6 . i roatrogip El ,... ft i f ..al )in•• 7 IVY •.% . % • _i s I . - %145, 0.i 0 -"''' • I L. . • . s arm n. 0 to , i......„, , ,,op_ C: • c• „ • • 1 il4r4qt DA 4) •"16.•• .r.7•• Vi'ilq".0.9. • • Ii" •--,N ;:...,,•:.!..i....,1.1 , fk.-4 1 , 1 9 .. 1 :;• -.1/- -5- 1 • i' -.... .--- •ci. -'•:- 7, : .„.,,,,,,,„,.._:_.,,,,..,.,..,.,.... .„.:,,,,,, ,,,.„,_...,,.Q..•.. _.......?.._.:!......__,,,,,,,.. c.,,.......,..,‘„,.,., _..,.,,..,,........ .'3 V.. J.- - , • :P-• I-- •c• - 7:: F . • ...........,_, A 111■1111... VIESI 1 .. W.: ...: 43 . - •.c •,-;:. 5.: ..: ' •f-...... I .,.. ..• :-..--,•:: ::: 0 • • ir " ...,0 0 god .• .., .9 .e..a.• ---..--' L-" --.---- ..".:' ::. A ''' . :liS.. ia-;:::::7:1.1.4..6-c. -.1 - 1 : -: ' 1: ": 1::: :11;47.:;;:6 • 7"'"' '42... v ..i • s '• ..,' • ':- 9 ..V, - '--: '"t ..::.6_: pti: ..i . ;.t. .0 ,) ; 0 ,•• - •;.s., : . \ ,.. t. • -,, 7;:f 3 :1•c.: c, ;: - •'' ' '''ebr 4111•:,.;,127317ei r• ■ ' 4 . W4 9- 11 , 27 4 - a ■•-• - ." ,- ; i adel ; ' • e. 1 -1=- 1 -/VV " 'i7,..- i i , 0 ' 1 — E.,. , ....„... .Eet ..3 S --. 1 36 ' A ._, 4.. . pr 'S • i. • - 1 =7R) ; a • .. . . ::::,:. 1,,,,s .0; „ ,, 0 i 4 . • • I, ... t.. C 44: : IS":-2: 7 :;? 1 17...,: ."-' 1; 1 ..... ' • 4 , ii,F..L.... :... .. 1.9t.. !V : ••• : a ' : s J. 1 ta - 1 , 5 ,. 1 19.:....1c1 ,(4 ,". .. .. . r %?- . .. -.10. 4 t r ....!._■ : ,., j . , IR t _ • • • •-m a.11 .. •-p odast____:_ill_..0.,.! - ooD 42 kV_ Cito 4, .........--...t• 1574 e g . it 0 44 5 - cii:,..MIVP .. f),, c 0 . ,.. ::? 7 .. ,4. - i .. 1 , ti'd 1! (74,1?• ■.. ttV":111* .........: . : : .'.4 • Vi•a-:::' ' • L • • o• .c.p, „,:. • I., •• ,... s .....: , • ,_., !..--, TG . " ,....„ . .. '..°i k. i : ' • s•F., . t a . .Airra 6•0.. • i■ I I -.I. , ...0 4, , .... ' 1 i i • ... . . ; ..'r t ' C' -'• i 1,: ,: 'T .- 7 , i , 1Z 1...7.-- - ', '. ',..!-,.-',, I a .,.:. ... • ......•%, _., -....„....„..... - - . • 1 • . tzed, ' f= 'Ag. '. • 'Cia 0 , r.• ____, , .% _ . _.:.. _ __•-•, ".',.._ -,1, C1 . 7 ,2 7 c c -1 7 . k'' l 'l": 4 F .,. C5 0 ..g o . :" : . q 4 4i.:e,„,..t L. liNkr• /MINERVA • fi CC u ; pt. . ° • - 14 itsi F.! • - •• . • : • itt:; 43 it, • rg. . • .9. • ; • `‘' - IN to ; •••22sug=1= *. 43;,. , ,,• f• •44 - • 4 • Zi) V..Sk. —1. • 10 • :•■• ,•■ . *: ! ••"." • i . t ,; ; :• — • - " 4 • II coot! t•c; F , 1•;••., , 010. 'ci54 4 qi=g9. • he' . 14 • 'a • t. 4 ha • • ! ,.." ) ,. 5 „ Frkg) AC" 6 g V : •I ,I40 • :go ..„41b.51 jr sti.roP0A .11.3 ; s , f! ' "ft. l • • IT%-V2:.. 1114:1 • 4 V4z, 4 ipigt,cgi, • .. 4 •4. qv. s ....; . IA • .1:, . • • ". • „ , I , • • • 11 Is- V r• F TION • cA SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /rf 7 4" Approved by the City. Council as its meeting of RECEIVED SEP 1 1993 ti i i$iIUN, I Y •DEVELOPMENT AN. ORDINANCE •OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, 'WASHINGTON, ANNEXING' CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE., CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA, ADOPTING ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, PROVIDING THAT SAID ANNEXED. AREA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME ANY SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING • INDEBTEDNESS, AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. On / 8 / 5b , the City Council of the City of Tukwila, passed Ordin o. which provides as follows: Annexes to the City of Tukwila the area descn • e • t erect, known as the Cascade View Annexation area, effective September 1, 1990, provides zoning and land use regulations for such area, provides that said area shall not be subject to prior City indebtedness, and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. J tu, ty Cler PUBLISHED: VALLEY DAILY NEWS - THURSDAY, JUNE 22, 1990 _ 4art �t." v�' k7:'+"' t.. �P .'Siral".��1`,"S+,{SJkU' "i RYE .+511Ni::G!KS''L"J�''nYJ:.�ra� King County Records and Elections Division Election Section 553 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296-1565 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )SS. COUNTY OF KING ) This is to certify that on May 22, 1990, there was held a Special Election in the Cascade View Proposed Annexation, King County, Washington, for the submission of a proposition to the voters for their approval or rejection; That the results of said election were duly canvassed by the King County Canvassing Board of Election Returns on June 1, 1990; . and the results of said canvass are as follows: Form E-47 PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF AREA KNOWN AS CASCADE VIEW TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA PROPOSITION NO. 1 PROPOSED ANNEXATION YES NO 121 377 CARRIED PROPOSITION NO. 2 p.SSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS YES NO 224 255 DEFEATED Dated at Seattle, Washington, this 1st day of June, 1990. AdostAay Ai ron gue, Manager � of Records and E ections --- Norm Melting Prosecuting Attorney April 12,1990 OFFICE OF THE KING COUNTY, IN AsritNUION CIVIL DIVISION R550 King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seettk, Wuhlnpo i 98104 (206) 2964015 FAX (206) 296 -0191 Jane Hague, Manager Records and Elections Division 553 Ring County Administration Building Seattle, Washington 98105 RE: Ballot Title and Explanatory Statement for Proposition No. . 1 -- Proposed Annexation by the City of Tukwila. Dear Ms. Hague: Consistent with RCW 29.27.060, RCW 29.81A.040(3), RCW 35A.29.120 and King County Code Chapter 1.10, this office has prepared a ballot title and an explanatory statement for the above - referenced proposition. By this letter I am transmitting the ballot title and explanatory statement to you. By copy of this letter I am also transmitting the ballot title and the explanatory statement to the King County Council and to the City of Tukwila, pursuant to RCW 29.27.065. The ballot title shall be as follows: "Shall the area of unincorporated King County commonly known as Cascade View and described in Ring County Ordinance No. 9 347 be annexed to the City of Tukwilla and the proposed zoning and land use regulations for the area described in City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1539 be adopted ?" The text of the explanatory statement shall. be: "The proposed annexation will be approved if a majority of the votes cast are in favor of annexation and adoption of the proposed zoning and ).and use regulations. If approved, the area known as the Cascade View Annex- ation Area, located in unincorporated Ring County ad jr+nAnt to the City of Tukwila, would booeme part of the City of Tukwila. In addition, comprehensive land use plan dasignationo and land use and zoning J :ogulaLlu a adopted by the City of Tukwila would apply to the entire annex- ation area as of the effective date of annexation." Prosecuting Attorney • King County Jane Hague April 12,1990 Page 2 if you have any questions about the foregoing, please do not . hesitate to call me at 296 -9015. 'V- ruly yours, ORM MALE C - unty Prosecuting Attorney tin . Yerxa ty Prosecut • A torney c : Lois North, Chair, Ring County Council Greg Nickels, . King County Council Member Clerk of the Ring County Council Clerk of the City of Tukwila Norm Maleng Prosecuting Attorney April 12,1990 OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON CIVIL. DIVISION Jane Hague, Manager Records and Elections Division 553 King County Administration Building Seattle, Washington 98105 RE: Eta lot Title and Explanatory Statement for Proposition No. 2 -- Assumption of Indebtedness for Proposed Cascade V, j Annexation Dear Ms. Hague: Consistent with RCW 29.27.060, RCW 29.81A.040(3), RCW 35A.29.120 and King County Code Chapter 1.10, this office has prepared a ballot title and an explanatory statement for the above - referenced proposition. By this letter 1 am transmitting the ballot title and explanatory statement to you. By copy of this letter I am also transmitting the ballot title and the explanatory statement to the King County Council and to the City of Tukwila, pursuant to RCW 29.27.065. The ballot title shall be as follows: "Shall all property within the proposed Cascade View Annexation Area, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as the property located within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed, to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, which indebtedness has been approved by the voters, contracted for, or incurred prior to, or existing at the date of annexation ?" The explanatory statement shall be as follows: "The proposition for the assumption of indebtedness will be approved if a majority of at least 60 percent of the voters in the proposed annexation area voting on the proposition vote in favor, and if the number of persons voting constitutes no less than 40 percent of the total number of votes cast in the last preceding general election. If passed, all property in the area would be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basin as property currently located within the City of Tukwila, to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the 13550 king County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue Seattle, %Minims 98104 (om) zvbvuis PAX (206) 296 .0191 Prostrating Attorney King County Jane Hague April 12, 1990 Page 2 City, including assessments for taxes in payment of bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation." If you have any questions about thA fht -Agni ng, please do not hesitate to call me at 296 - 9015. v `yruly yours, /For N)RM MALE n Yerxa ing C•unty Prosecuting Attorney cc Leis North, C air, King County Council Greg Nickels, King County Council Member Clerk of the King County Council Clerk of the City of Tukwila Tukwila Statement on the Effect of Adopting Annexation Questions 1 and 2. Adoption of Question No. 1 by a majority of those voters casting ballots would make the area a part of the City of Tukwila and subject to all City ordinances. Tukwila ordinances would include, but not be limited to, the preannexation zoning and comprehensive plan designations previously adopted by the Tukwila City Council for the Cascade area. Adoption of Question No. 2 requires a 60% majority of those voting and a total vote of at least 40% of the number voting in the last general election. Adoption of Question No. 2 would result in Cascade View properties being taxed to help pay for the existing Tukwila bonded indebtedness. This additional tax is approximately $15/$100,000 assessed value in 1989 and will be totally paid off by 1998. Failure to adopt Question No.2 will require a special City Council ordinance to accept the annexation. The Council would either accept the annexation, or terminate the annexation and leave the area as part of unincorporated King County. File No. Vern2: CCSCDVOT AGENDA ITEM: DATE: March 9, 1990 PROPOSED NO: 90 -248 PREPARED BY: Holly Kean SUBJECT: Establishing May 22, 1990 as the election date for voters in an area known as Cascade View to decide whether to annex to the City of Tukwila. SUMMARY: Citizens of an area known as Cascade View petitioned the City of Tukwila for. annexation. The recent incorporation of the City of SeaTac left this 581 acre area geographically isolated from the rest of unincorporated King County. The Council requested the King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) to invoke jurisdiction so the community could best be served by a public review of the annexation request. The BRB approved the annexation proposal with a modified boundary. The purpose of the modification iS to preserve natural communities and to keep the jurisdictional line from bisecting individual land parcels. AREA CHARACTERISTICS: The boundaries of the annexation area are Highway 99 on the east, Military Road South on the west, South 152nd Street on the south, and 24th Avenue South and South 116th Street on the north. The estimated population of the area is 3,061. This will increase Tukwila's population by 28 percent to 13,984. The annexation of this 581 acre area would increase the city's land base by 11 percent. This is a fully developed area with a mix of commercial and single family and multifamily housing. Riverton Hospital, Cascade View Elementary School, and Riverton Cemetery are located within. There is a vacant 24 acre parcel owned by Riverton Hospital. Besides voting to assume a portion of the indebtedness of Tukwila, the voters will be asked to approve zoning proposed by the city. Because it's already developed, the changes will not be radical. The potential multifamily designation allowing up to 18 .units per'acre will be removed from a four block single family neighborhood in the western portion of the annexation area south of South 140th Street. The 24 acre vacant parcel will have a zoning change which allows a mix of offices and multifamily, instead of only multifamily. According to the BRB report, the total assessed property valuation is $101,000,000. The fiscal analysis prepared by the city.estimates King County revenue losses at $584,000. It further estimates that savings due to service reductions range from $445,000 to $620,000. The voting will be by mail. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: DO PASS Proposed Substitute Motion 90 -248 to correction the election date. ATTENDING: John McFarland, City of Tukwila ATTACHMENTS: A. Proposed Substitute Ordinance 90 -248 B. Map HK :hlm 0801F KING COUNTY COUNCIL COMMITTEE -OF- THE -WHOLE COMMITTEE REPORT March 5, 1990 2473H /HK:hdm /him ORDINANCE NO. Introduced by: Greg Nickels Proposed No.: 90 -248 SUBSTITUTE AN ORDINANCE establishing the date of an election on the question of annexation, zoning and assumption on indebtedness to the City of Tukwila of an unincorporated area known as Cascade View. STATEMENT OF FACT: 1. The City of Tukwila, Washington, by Resolution No. 1131 has determined that it is in, the public interest, health, safety and general welfare to provide for annexation of an area known as Cascade View in accordance with Chapter 35A.14 R.C.W. 2. Said resolution does satisfy the provisions of R.C.W. 35A.14.01O for qualification for annexation. 3. The City of Tukwila, by Resolution No. 1131 adopted January 5, 1990, concurs in the annexation of the area known as Cascade View, as modified by the King County Bounadry Review Board for the State of Washington, and as provided by R.C.W. 35A.14.05O. 4. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.93.100, the Boundary Review Board (BRB) invoked jurisdiction and in accordance with RCW 36.39.160 on January 9, 1990; filed its written decision approving the legal boundaries with modification the proposed annexation. 5. Pursuant to Chapter 29.13 and RCW 35A.14, the council deems an emergency exists for the purpose of calling a special election. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. A special election shall be held on the 22nd day of May, 1990, in accordance with R.C.W. 35A.14.O5O to be held within the territory of the proposed annexation, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters within said territory the questions of annexation, zoning and assumption of indebtedness. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 SECTION 2. The number of registered voters within the subject areas is estimated at 987 as nearly as may be determined from available records of the King County Election Department, and has been certified as such. SECTION 3. The ballot title, as directed by statute, should, be substantially as follows: A. Shall the area as described in this ordinance of unincorporated King County commonly known as Cascade View be annexed to and be a part of the City of Tukwila and the zoning and land use regulations for the area as found in City of Tukwila be adopted? FOR ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS AGAINST ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS B. Shall all property within the area, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as the property of the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation FOR ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS AGAINST ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS SECTION 4. The boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation are hereby described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of the Northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet East of the West 1/4 corner of said Section; Thence North 18 East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the North margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; . 2473H;hdm;h1m/3 -5 -90 -2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Thence North 88 West along said Easterly extension and continuing Westerly along said North margin to the East margin of Military Road South; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North margin of South 128th Street; Thence East along said North margin to its intersection with the South line of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing East along said South line to a point of intersection with a line lying 250 feet (measured perpendicular to) Westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Highway South; Thence Northerly along said parallel line to the South line of the North 34 feet of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 9; Thence continuing Northerly along said line which lies 250 feet Westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Highway South a distance of 5 feet more or less to a point located opposite state PT 527 + 88.4 on said road centerline; Thence N12- 21 -28W a distance of 200.30 feet; Thence S88- 56 -52W to a point which lies 564.93 feet Westerly of the West margin of Pacific Highway South when measured along said line; Thence North 00- 05 -43E a distance of 483.93 feet more or less to a point on the South line of tax lot 092304 -9367; Thence West to a point which lies 609.72 feet East of the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 9, said point being the Southeast corner of tax lot 002304 -9034; Thence Northerly to a point on the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 614.26 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; Thence East along said North line to a point located 300 feet Westerly of the West margin of Pacific Highway South (distance measured along said North line); Thence Northwesterly to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 100 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; Thence East along said North line to the Westerly limited access line of PSH No. 1 (SR -99); Thence generally Northerly along said Westerly limited access line to its intersection with the South margin of South 116th Way (South 116th Place); Thence East along said South margin to the West margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No. 1); 2473H:hdm:hlm/3 -5 -90 -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Thence Northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Easterly along said thread to the Northerly extension o the new Easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA; Thence Southerly along said Northerly extension and continuing Southerly along the East margin of Pacific Highway South to the North line of South 152nd Street; Thence Westerly along said North margin and the Westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SECTION 5. The notice of election shall be published as required by law. • SECTION 6. As provided in RCW 29.36.120 and King County motio 7393, the King County council requests the manager of records and election department to conduct the election by mail. INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this day of , 1990. PASSED this day of , 1990. ATTEST: Clerk of the. Council APPROVED this KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING CUUNTY, WASHINGTON Chair day of , 1990. King County Executive 2473H:hdm:h1m /3 -5 -9U -4 EXHIBIT B ANNEXATION TO crry OF TUKWILA (Cascade View) COUNCIL DISTRICT KING COUNTY ORD. NO. CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO, • SIM 1 IS. • • II. ........... anrlo. 1•0110 1 • 0.00 110111010•0•5 • • I,a. o • 10 • • M. RIVEa • do• • ••• ••• ftoro••■•••••• ••■••• -SW Zu••••0114 T . A 01.11•11‘11114 • 'Soo • Na IMO • NI I I • • I ....• •• os .1 11.• • !' fr. 11 1' . es f • o •I J. i I i ••• 016 ,- .•••••• Ott' • • • • • NIT 111 • t, t 8, P .. I 6 t 16. )--1 t . r . - -- ,--, r --.--: 1 ▪ - 0 0 - ur '- 0 4 D x -J IU oz X Z IJJ 4 t go 4 2 Cr LIA 0 M W LC >•• 4 LL. In q=c • 2 o • IL a= -. -- - •1rX ..._ _ .-- - - • .., . .. 1. -.' • - 100 .0 .I0 .. t. i ;,,... .•: .„ I •,Ir i --- . : 1 IP& 0 11 ....." . , • TFZ ,_.... I 0 . • . , D owIlstISM 1 , I qr. 4 I './..' 1 , . ti. I . .V . - • f 'al .. , • i • .. 0 ; ' •°1•• it II I ' . 1. 0. I , .. Firb, 1. 1 _III. q ir ii. , ,,..„, 1 ,.?) .. ' 6.... 0 .• t• , y . .;,, t - . ., •i ,,,,,. : •••••,...,.,„... y..: ,.. i . li - ....-1- t , • ju -2r ... . A it' .n rat 11 .3 O.. • " -- - . . . --- ;•d :. - I . '.-.):-; „?6,- ..- . , . • :1. c ; r : ', ..A. _.- - . .c !I L• s dIZ : :: 1 ,',.. 'rtiPs... LI • ii - ... ; : i..,.., ....... .. ........3 . , i:17 . 1 ..,..... .... t .:1 . 1, - • offid . : • • • i ' I. ---' It " .1 • ' 1 " - ' • .>". Er ••Zi .______. . . 1....; .:.. - , " - 14. 14.- .: 1 1 1 11. 4. ....' .:- 8 \ . . . 0 ' . -. 6 .1::'.. .- • 1,t:' t.).••. .."' . IS. • • '...- •„... ' .:'.. . :s• IU; • 1 .: JA ,.. 91, - - - .. -I- , ZI .... _---..--- ••-••:.:....--, • Irc • • .-- - .3. •• •1 -II Is• ..;.:::.. I . ii!. .., .. , „ ?u,r 4 . 1/6 , ,,,, 11.11 ..... if , 4 . l.... 1 1441"4 , - • 7 /67 .- '; 0 . ti .... .. :14.. '. . . ' • • .. • • a : 6. • 1 ..8 3J;1 • .. .• -... .. % A • s ip . . . : ., . 1:, : ... i i ,.. .. , : 1.4!47.97:30111:79:::. 14 :• ...• L.b. r ,... 1 : : . I .. 1 1 7 , •'. • " Z " C ,,. . W11 4iii i i r 4.... . ... 1 4 e. . • ' ri 1 : 1 Lr•'*- - i t ,,, ear ••• i .. e , . - . . .. •ottt 11 I .. . ••06,..- i y % r ... • ■ ft ,,,._ ...•aa.. . i .• ...... , . Itti, -i• 'kr ; - -. . . . . ., ta i- t;J!,..7 . - - • - - - - - C7 92- - ..... • :•.: ' ''.. i '' s I t ej .l q' ill i . ••••• * c' i-* 4 • • 1.151‘ .r 1 1 'I.:, IA .1 1 ... : ....JO • ' ' Ili) "' . ! .1. . . tu . ,, . ' .1...•‘:.'1:4-1; '`'-11 In" c.4::-.1.7::::11 11-7:: 1:fff7:::::. 4....1:17:u..v.u.s14'...::n:':1: . 1 . t. 1 : .1-Liw: 17; ': - Igirii •••";.'11...a. el j 6i •11:111..-1 14-11.1111- 6 111:11111 GO . 1 t•I ; C::7 - 1 111: 1 t . , r i fictrAf ts.0.......47-:....., r , Fg ,. vu, • u. --- I 1 ; 1. - .! , • 1 ... rs ; .. I i,....0 ,,...., yl .,..; t•irp7..... # ,..4 . c. c. 1 :.‘",' " .• " _;..r f- i.i : . • A •-• 1.....!:...:10; • - -'"./ .. .4e .,...-S.:.. ... t., ,- . • - - IA • i ' I • 1 r... L.. .t•i I )- 7 'T • e -•-: 1' r ..- .4,... - i ...,. • - g: :. . ••■*-.'", ..„, .:. . :r i • . . r . . .., ... ! . 7:2 ::Iiiiel ;,,,. ,:i. ... ., ti i , u we,01.e•i■ell•e• . . .2 6'.....! '. I - c5 . :. .x. 1 'A. 4.,,,,4, 7. • • 4; • „ I 1,./. :.;•:,...,.:4 • i,is. -' *--... -.:' it ,. • '' . 7 rx.• ,,,... 1 . ,- ... . . . , . . _ . 1 , .. -.Pr../ . I\ , i I ..",•„.; 1:; .:.'..; ,:.',.' liT;r NrOteri; 9 .1.;\.t. ; 16 .;,41.v.i.iv.t.b.; tv- ,... ,, ...._ .. . ‘• oil-4- • 10 410111111 t ,I••• • /Eitel_ - 1 I r -- 1 .11 4111.• •• Iriet • te /111111 ; \\ \\A 41 - 91 •-„, - S. • 1 v ...., b - 1.... 1 I 1".•• • ..1. .. •••• • . 1::rt • •• 1! „ • - 0 14:: .LV 9 7, 1.: 1;11 0c.0 .= • • • AI * II g . • • :.• .• , ,t U • 1 • =NZ? e , • •firt• JLJ • • •. -,to - : .• , , ' • 1/ v • " • • • • •• • ' .•• . • I ' %. ( • . 4 6, •1. r . • R • •i• • - : • 4,0 . • ri " 113 • • • 17 • • • g • 1 „ ..„ iii.1.1.; 4 - 1 I " • " • • ta V . 1 a " g I - c• rileoled • • rAf .*•• 0 or i s pc.. „ • • • g • V • • IP wtr.,*(11 I) I „ r.1 • U 11 . " air e• 'CI • s tir a - -re ' • 41•66! 0. . ■• 1 4eu gq • :11 -$-.) • 11 • 'h". o : o d'J • c- 1 - . - • --c) - 1 N 116 r I 'I • • e a • to:" • • - • • :-1.• .1 . 0 • .01 • I ' r: 1 . 1 c - '1 5 bf . 6%;ilings2.1 1)-1. igt- • • - • • •t rri446 - . t • ( r4keryt•.14‘00..- * `f • March 5, 1990 Introduced by: Greg Nickels 2473H /HK:hdm /hlm View, State 4. SECTION 1. May, 1990, in the territory submitting to ORDINANCE NO. Proposed No.: 90 -248 9347 AN ORDINANCE establishing the date of an election on the question of annexation, zoning and assumption on indebtedness to the City of Tukwila of an unincorporated area known as Cascade View. STATEMENT OF FACT: 1. The City of Tukwila,: Washington, by Resolution No. 1131 has determined that it is in the public interest, health, safety and general welfare to provide for annexation of an area known as Cascade View in accordance with Chapter i5A.14 R.C.W. 2. Said resolution does satisfy the provisions of R.C.W. 35A.14.010 for qualification for annexation. 3. The City of Tukwila, by Resolution No. 1131 adopted January 5, 1990, concurs in the annexation of the area known as Cascade as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board for the of Washington, and as provided by R.C.W. 35A.14.U50. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.93.100, the Boundary Review Board (BRB) invoked jurisdiction and in accordance with RCW 36.39.160 on January 9, 1990, filed its written decision approving the legal boundaries with modification the proposed annexation. 5. Pursuant to Chapter 29.13 and RCW 35A.14, the council deems an emergency exists for the purpose of calling a special election. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: • A special election shall be held on the 22nd day of: accordance with R.C.W. 35A.14.050 to be held within of the proposed annexation, for the purpose of the qualified voters within said territory the questions of annexation, zoning and assumption of indebtedness. 9347 SECTION 2. The number of registered voters within the subject areas is estimated at 987 as nearly as may be determined from available records of the King County Election Department, and has been certified as such. SECTION 3. The ballot title, as directed by statute, should be substantially as follows: A. Shall the area as described in this ordinance of unincorporated King County commonly known as Cascade View be annexed to and be a part of the City of Tukwila and the zoning and land use regulations for the area as found in City of Tukwila be adopted? FOR ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS AGAINST ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS B. Shall all property within the area, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as the property of the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation FOR ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS AGAINST ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS SECTION 4. The boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation are hereby described as follows: .2,7)6- Commencing at a(point on the South line of the Northwest quarter of Section .301, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet East of the West 1/4 corner of said Section; Thence North 18 East'along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the North margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TYPG a tJ c- /17)14,m, co2, c CP 2S Y K'N G c„. pen_ .rI#t Z3 c7e - 6 S , M j w No Wt ci .57XA , CN:67v ) - r ac T co-7 re/e- /C/• C co, Ct-en.c 2473H:hdm:hlm/3 -5 -90 -2- ? Thence North 88 West along said Easterly extension and continuing Westerly along said North margin to the East margin of Military Road South; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North margin of South 128th Street; Thence East along said North margin to its intersection with the South line of the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing East along said South line to a point of intersection with a line lying 250 feet (measured perpendicular to) Westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Highway South; Thence Northerly along said parallel line to the South line of the North 34 feet of the North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 9; Thence continuing Northerly along said line which lies 250 feet Westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Highway South a distance of 5 feet more or less to a point located opposite state PT 527 + 88.4 on said road centerline; Thence N12- 21 -28W a distance of 2UU.30 feet; 9347 Thence S88- 56 -52W to a point which lies 564.93 feet Westerly of the West margin of Pacific Highway South when measured along said line; Thence North 00- 05- 43E of 483.93 feet more or less to a point on the South line of tax lot 092304 -9367; Thence West to a point which lies 609.72 feet East of the West line of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 9, said point being the Southeast corner of tax lot 002304 -9034; Thence Northerly to a point on the North line of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 614.26 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; Thence East along said North line to a point located 300 feet Westerly of the West margin of Pacific Highway South (distance measured along said North line); Thence Northwesterly to a point on the North line of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 100 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; Thence East along said North line to the Westerly limited access line of PSH No. 1 (SR -99); Thence generally Northerly along said Westerly limited access line to its intersection with the South margin of South 116th Way (South 116th Place); Thence East along said South margin to the West margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No. 1); 2473H:ndm:hlm/3 -5 -90 -3- 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 Thence Northerly along said west margin to the thread of the . Duwamish River; Thence Easterly along said thread to the Northerly extension o the new Easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA, Thence Southerly along said Northerly extension and continuing Southerly along the East margin of Pacific Highway South to the North line of South 152nd Street; Thence Westerly along said North margin and the Westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT uF BEGINNING. SECTION 5. The notice of election shall be published as required by law. SECTION 6. As provided in RCW 29.36.120 and King County motio 7393, the King County council requests the manager of records and election department to conduct the election by mail. INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this 5 -#41 day of , 199U. PASSED this /Q: day of 'Maw , 1990. ATTEST: Clerk of the Council 2473H:hdm:h1m/3 -5 -90 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON �) gl Chair APPROVED this 23 day of flar-cJk 9347 , 1990. King County Executive CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 1/3/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE PROPOSED CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA AS MODIFIED BY THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY . ;. REVIEW BOARD BY THE ELECTION METHOD AND REQUEST- ING AN ELECTION DATE WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the King County prosecuting attor- ney certified the petition as being sufficient, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the City Council caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. 1112, expressed approval of annexation of the area known as cascade View Annexation Area subject to final determination of the boundary by the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board, on January 11, 1990, entered an order approving a modified boundary for the annexation area, and WHEREAS, after public hearings on September 11, 1989, and October 15, 1989, the City Council passed ordinance No. 1539 on November 6, 1989, providing for comprehensive plan designations and zoning and land use regulations for the area to become effective upon annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the pro- posed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property known as the Cascade View Annexation Area, as modified and approved by the King County Boundary Review Board in its decision of January 11, 1990. The area is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which exhibits are incorporated herein. The Council requests that the King County council immediately proceed. to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held within the proposed annexation area on May 22, 1990, to decide the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and if that date is not available then on the earliest date thereafter as shall be approved by the King county Department of Records and Elections. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council previously adopted ordinance No. 1539, providing for Comprehen- sive Land Use Policy Plan Map designations and zoning and land use regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed, together with the question of annexation, the adoption of said zoning and land use regulations to be effective upon annexation. Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the elec- torate of the territory to be annexed a separate proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to pro - vide notice of this resolution to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASH- INGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1990. ROVED AS TO FO ffice of the City A orney FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK / ' - 90 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: oZ - s - 9 0 RESOLUTION NUMBER 1/3 / an Hernandez, Council Presi • ent ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: RESOLUTION Page 2 Maxim Anderson, ity Clerk � r. �..... �. �.. wr. u. a:.[ e:f 4:'✓} ti. t: 7VJ' 3:.} R` J: ieV.. 4: %l�:i.�2W:1:U:'1Gi°�[-.hk�'tt:: 11f<L�: "hFa:ll.+ skew. �3'+ faof. �uawKflnl wluM+L tl" �. Li4] ftiT.l O: ]Hlf }ENA�6L"Yn\ttiM1C�.�Yw.�!]e, v. trvaMmcar.. ew+ u... rw. wr+ � .vra..e.n.ro.�.arownwau�..... --- ..�..�............- ..�.. —.�. —. January 12, 1990 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: ALDA H. WILKINSON, Executive Secretary IN RE: RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION FILE NO. 1622: CITY OF TUKWILA - Annexation (Cascade View) The Resolution and Hearing Decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County on the above - referenced file is enclosed for filing as prescribed by RCW 36.93.160(4). l In order for the proposed action to be finalized, it is now necessary that you complete the other statutory requirements or procedures specified in your Notice of Intention. Where required, you must file with King County a certified copy of your final ordinance or resolution accomplishing this action, together with a copy of this letter, with the Office of the Clerk of the Council, 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle, Washington 98104, ATTN: Ms. Helene Mociulski. If this proposal has been denied, you need to do nothing further. AHW /pr XC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski Council Committee /Community Planning & Resources, ATTN: Arthur Thornsbury Ms. Lois Schwennesen, Acting Director, Parks, Planning & Resources Department Mr. Iry Berteig, Manager, Building and Land Development Division Ms. Miriam Greenbaum, Acting Manager, Planning & Community Dev. Division King County Department of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight King County Department of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock King County Department of Records and Elections King County E -911 Program The Honorable Boards of Commissioners: Rainier Vista and Val Vue Sewer Districts; King County Water Districts Nos. 20, 125; King County Fire Protection Districts Nos. 2 and 11 Superintendents: Highline and South Central School Districts Enclosure: Resolution and Hearing Decision REF: 1/90.HE8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 :JG IN RE: CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed Annexation (Cascade View) King County, Washington PROCEEDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY FILE NO. 1622 RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION The Notice of Intention filed in Boundary Review Board File No. 1622 proposed the annexation of certain territory known as "Cascade View" by the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. After notice duly given, a hearing was held December 5, 1989, before a quorum of the Boundary Review Board at Cascade View Elementary School, 13601 32nd Avenue South, Seattle, Washington. On the basis of the testimony, evidence, and exhibits presented at said Hearing, and the matters on file in said File No. 1622, it is the decision of the Board that the action proposed in said Notice of Intention be, and the same is, hereby approved as modified by deletion of territory. The legal description of the modified annexation area is attached hereto and marked as "Exhibit A", together with a map showing the boundaries of the area as modified herein marked as "Exhibit B ". In reaching this decision, the Board has considered the many factors prescribed in RCW 36.93.170. The following have been selected for particular attention: Area, Population and Population Density FACTORS AFFECTING THIS PROPOSAL The proposed Cascade View annexation to the City of Tukwila is a long, narrow strip of territory running north and south between the City of Tukwila on the east and the newly incorporated City of Sea -Tac on the west. The boundaries of the proposed annexation area are Highway 99 (Pacific Highway) on the east, Military Road South on the west, South 152nd Street on the south, and 24th Avenue South and South 116th Street on the north. The population of the proposed Cascade View annexation area is estimated at 3,061, compared to a current population of 10,923 for the City of Tukwila. The proposed annexation would increase the population of Tukwila by 28 percent to a total population of 13,984. The population of the proposed Cascade View annexation area would comprise 22 percent of the total City of Tukwila population following annexation. The area of the proposed Cascade View annexation is 581 acres. The annexation would increase the geographical area of the City of Tukwila by approximately 11 percent. Population density of the annexation area is approximately 5.27 persons per acre, compared to an overall population density of 2.12 persons per acre for the existing City of Tukwila. PAGE ONE - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Land Uses Comprehensive Land Use Plans and Zoning Per Capita Assessed Valuation Topography, Natural Boundaries and Drainage Basins Proximity to Other Populated Areas Likelihood of Significant Growth PAGE TWO - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) The proposed annexation area is almost fully developed with a mixture of uses, including commercial uses along Highway 99 and both single and multiple family residential development in western portions of the area. Riverton Hospital, Cascade View Elementary School, and Riverton Cemetery are all centrally located within the proposed annexation area. Major undeveloped areas include property owned by Riverton Hospital and the steep slope above Highway 99 in the northern portion of the annexation area. The City of Tukwila has completed a Comprehensive Plan amendment and pre- annexation zoning to cover the proposed Cascade View annexation area. King County and City of Tukwila comprehensive land use plans and zoning all generally reflect existing land use. The City of Tukwila proposes only two significant changes from King County zoning. One is for a four -block single family residential area located in the western portion of the annexation area south of South 140th Street. King County assigned a potential zoning classification which would allow redevelopment to multiple family residential at a density of approximately 18 units per acre. The City of Tukwila proposes continued single family residential zoning to protect the currently existing single family residential use. The second proposed zoning change involves the major undeveloped property within the annexation area. This is approximately 24 acres of vacant land owned by Riverton Hospital and located to the east of the hospital. Current King County zoning is single family residential, but the hospital has proposed a rezoning which would allow multiple family residential development at 48 units per acre. The City of Tukwila proposes a combination of office with multiple family residential developmenmt at ten units per acre. The total assessed valuation for the proposed Cascade View annexation area is $100,900,502. The per capita assessed valuation is $32,963, based on a population of 3,061. This compares with a per capita assessed valuation of $152,888 in the existing City of Tukwila. The proposed Cascade View annexation area is within the Lower Green River drainage basin and drains to the east. The major portion of the annexation area is located on a plateau which ends in east facing slopes near the eastern boundary of the area. There are steep slopes above Highway 99 in the northeastern part of the proposed annexation area. Boundaries of the proposed annexation area are major roads, rather than natural features. The proposed Cascade View annexation is a fully developed and populated area surrounded by similar fully urbanized communities. Adjacent incorporated areas are the City of Tukwila to the east and the newly incorporated City of Sea -Tac to the west. The proposed Cascade View annexation area is almost fully developed, and opportunity for significant future growth does not exist. The major undeveloped property remaining ' in the annexation area is the Riverton Hospital property approximately 24 acres in size and centrally 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 J2 located within the proposed annexation. It is anticipated that development of the steep slope area in the northeastern part of the annexation will be constrained by environmental restrictions. Location of Community Facilities Community facilities located within the proposed annexation area include Cascade View Elementary School and Riverton Hospital, both centrally located within the area. King County administrative offices are located primarily in downtown Seattle, with land development and building inspection offices located in Bellevue. The Tukwila City Hall is located to the southeast of the proposed annexation area in the southeastern portion of the City of Tukwila. Present Adequacy of Governmental Services The Cascade View annexation area is one of four areas excluded from the City of Sea -Tac incorporation area and considered for annexation to the City of Tukwila. The other three areas, the Riverton, Foster and Thorndyke annexation areas, were annexed to the City of Tukwila following hearings combined with the Sea -Tac incorporation hearings held in November 1988. The Cascade View area could not be addressed as a separate annexation area at that time due to the fact that it was not contiguous with the City of Tukwila until after the other three annexations. Following incorporation of the new City of Sea -Tac adjacent to the west and completion of the Riverton, Foster and Thorndyke annexations adjacent to the east, the proposed Cascade View annexation area remains as a peninsula of unincorporated territory geographically isolated from other areas of unincorporated King County. This geographical situation in relation to the remainder of unincorporated King County presents potential service delivery problems. The purpose of the proposed annexation is to provide the residents of the annexation area with improved services. Areas in need of improvement include geographical proximity to government service offices and accessibility to elected officials. Prospects of Governmental Services from Other Sources The alternative available to the Cascade View area for obtaining municipal services was inclusion in the newly incorporated City of Sea -Tac. This alternative was eliminated at the time of the joint hearings on the Sea -Tac incorporation and proposed annexations to Tukwila. It was determined that the Cascade View area identifies more closely with the City of Tukwila. Probable Effect of Proposal on Cost and Adequacy of Services Following annexation, the City of Tukwila would provide the Cascade View area with police protection, fire protection, street improvements, and general municipal administrative services. Water and sanitary sewer service would continue to be provided by the districts currently serving the area. The City of Tukwila has generally accomplished staff and service capability increases required to provide services to all four annexation areas excluded from the Sea -Tac incorporation, including the anticipated Cascade View annexation along with the recently completed Riverton, Foster and Thorndyke annexations. Services provided by the City would be at City of Tukwila standards. Services provided by the water and sewer districts would remain unchanged. Police Protection City of Tukwila analysis of police service needs in the proposed Cascade View annexation area concludes that the addition of six to eight police officers and support staff would be required to PAGE THREE - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Clod:) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 serve the area. According to the analysis, the number of police service calls in the area is high in relation to the geographical size and population, which indicates the presence of serious problems. The analysis notes that this is not unusual in Tukwila due to location, uses and access. The City of Tukwila has planned for the additional police service capacity necessary to provide the annexation area with the established City of Tukwila level of service. Fire Protection Fire protection service is currently provided to the Cascade View annexation area by two King County Fire Protection Districts, Nos. 2 and 11. District No. 11 serves the major portion of the annexation area, and District No. 2 serves only the southern tip of the area. The fire station serving most of the area is District No. 11 Fire Station #14 located northwest of the Cascade View area and staffed with a combination of full -time and volunteer personnel. Following annexation to the City of Tukwila, the City would assume responsibility for providing fire protection service to the Cascade View area. All Tukwila fire stations are staffed exclusively with full -time personnel. The City of Tukwila hired 13 additional firefighters during the summer of 1989 to serve newly acquired annexation areas, and no additional personnel are required to handle service for Cascade View. Service to the Cascade View annexation area would be primarily from Tukwila Fire Station #2 located to the southeast in close proximity to the annexation area. Response times to the Cascade View area are estimated at less than four minutes. Water Water service is currently provided to the Cascade View annexation area by two King County Water Districts, Nos. 20 and 125, and by the Seattle Municipal Water District. Water District No. 125 services approximately the southern half of the annexation area, and Water District No. 20 services approximately the northern half of the annexation area. A small area in the northeastern • part of the annexation is within the Seattle Municipal Water District. There would be no changes in water service as a result of the proposed annexation. Sewer Sanitary sewer service is currently provided to the Cascade View annexation area by the Rainier Vista and Val -Vue Sewer Districts. Rainier Vista Sewer District services approximately the northern half of the annexation area, and Val -Vue Sewer District services approximately the southern half of the area. There would be no changes in sanitary sewer service as a result of the proposed annexation. Surface Water The City of Tukwila recently established a surface water utility which would handle surface water management for the Cascade View annexation area. The surface water utility was scheduled for implementation in January 1990. Standards established for surface water management generally conform to King County standards and are consistent with the Green River Management Agreement. Cost of Services Residents of the Cascade View annexation area would pay lower taxes following annexation. The tax rate would decrease from $3.681 per $1,000 in assessed valuation to $3.010 per $1,000 in assessed valuation. Residents would be paying less for equal or improved municipal. services. PAGE FOUR - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Effect on the Finances, Debt Structure and Contractual Obligations of Affected Governmental Units City of Tukwila The fiscal analysis prepared by the City of Tukwila for the proposed Cascade View annexation estimates annual operating revenues at $738,000 and annual operating expenses at $650,000 to $895,000. In addition, capital costs associated with the annexation are estimated at $250,000. A major expenditure item is the cost of additional police service estimated at $330,000 to $470,000 annually. The annual cost of additional fire protection service required for the Cascade View area is estimated at only $15,000 to $30,000 as a result of major personnel expansions and capital expenditures already accomplished in order to serve newly annexed territory. The City of Tukwila is prepared to commit to the expenditures required to serve the proposed Cascade View annexation. King County The fiscal analysis prepared by the City of Tukwila for the proposed Cascade View annexation estimates that King County would lose $584,000 in revenues as a result of the annexation. The fiscal analysis states that reductions in King County service expenditures are difficult to calculate due to unavailability of figures specific to the Cascade View area. As an indication of expenditure reduction, costs of police protection, court services and road improvements were calculated for Tukwila service levels. The estimate derived for savings due to service reductions is $445,000 to $620,000. Fire Protection Districts Revenue lost to the two King County Fire Protection Districts serving the Cascade View area is estimated at $151,400. The major provider of fire service to the area is District No. 11, with District No..2 serving only the southern tip of the area. The City of Tukwila fiscal analysis states that savings realized from service expenditure reduction are difficult to calculate due to the fact that an undetermined minimum level of resources is required for operation of the remaining district. Water and Sewer Districts The proposed Cascade View annexation would have no effect on the finances of the water and sewer districts currently serving the area. The same districts would continue the same service. OBJECTIVES This decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board tends to accomplish the pertinent objectives specified in RCW 36.93.180. The particularly significant objectives in this proposal are as follows: Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities The originally proposed Cascade View annexation to the City of Tukwila encompasses the remaining portion of South Central School District not already within the City, along with a small portion of Highline School District in the northwestern part of the proposed annexation area. In order to preserve natural communities resulting from school district identification, the annexation area is modified to exclude an area generally equivalent to the Highline School District portion. Use of the exact school district boundary line is impractical both due to the Let that individual PAGE FIVE - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 parcels would be split and due to the fact that parcels without direct access from the City of Tukwila would be included in the annexation. Inclusion of the remainder of South Central School District within the City of Tukwila would serve to further unify and preserve the school district community. South Central School District is a small district with only five schools, including one high school, one junior high school, and two elementary schools within the existing City of Tukwila. The fifth school, Cascade View Elementary School, is centrally located within the proposed Cascade View annexation area and serves as a community focal point for the annexation area. South Central School District, with only one high school, Foster High School located in Tukwila, provides an identity for the Tukwila area. Annexation of the remainder of South Central School District would allow for inclusion of Cascade View Elementary School in education programs conducted in cooperation with the City of Tukwila. The City of Tukwila currently offers drug prevention, fire prevention, career education, and parks and recreation programs within the schools in Tukwila. Inclusion of the entire school district within the City would provide for expansion of this beneficial, cooperative relationship. While residents within the South Central School District portion of Cascade View identify with the City of Tukwila, residents within the Highline School District portion do not share a sense of community with the City of Tukwila. Highline School District residents in the northwestern portion of the proposed annexation area express strong preference for remaining within unincorporated King County at this time. Reduction of the originally proposed Cascade View annexation area approximately along the boundary line between South Central and Highline School Districts serves to preserve natural neighborhoods and communities defined by school attendance areas. This decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (1). Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours The boundaries of the originally proposed Cascade View annexation area are highways and major roadways. The originally proposed annexation area is defined by Military Road South on the west and by Highway 99 (Pacific Highway) on the east. The southern boundary is South 152nd Street, and the northern boundary follows 24th Avenue South and South 116th Street. The modified boundary of the annexation area is defined by highways, roadways and property lines. The boundary approximates the school district boundary line, but is adjusted to follow property lines in order to avoid splitting individual parcels of land. A major portion of the boundary of the annexation area still follows Military Road South and Highway 99. This decision to approve the annexation as modified tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (2). Creation and preservation of logical service areas The proposed Cascade View annexation to the City of Tukwila would improve police and fire protection service areas by including both sides of Highway 99 within the City of Tukwila. Responsibility for Highway 99 is currently shared between the City of Tukwila with authority on the east side and King County with authority on the west side. Inclusion of all of Highway 99 PAGE SIX - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 .- J G within the City would eliminate service provision difficulties resulting from shared responsibility and the need for coordination. The modified boundary accomplishes the same objective by including all properties fronting on Highway 99 within the annexation. Properties without direct access from Highway 99 are excluded as part of the exclusion of Highline School District. Several properties within South Central School District would not have direct police and fire emergency vehicle access from the City of Tukwila if the modified boundary exactly followed the school district boundary line. This would create service provision difficulties for the City. In order to create logical service areas, only properties with direct access to Highway 99 and the City of Tukwila remain within the modified annexation area. Modification of the originally proposed annexation area to exclude the northwesterly portion not only preserves school district communities, but also promotes the creation and preservation of logical fire protection service areas. Residents in the northwestern portion of the originally proposed Cascade View annexation area expressed opposition to annexation based on fire protection service considerations. This neighborhood is currently served by District No. 11 Fire Station #14 located immediately to the northwest of the proposed annexation area. The neighborhood is not as easily accessible from Tukwila tire stations located to the northeast and southeast of the annexation area. An inadvertent omission from the originally proposed annexation area creates a service delivery problem. The legal description fails to include a triangular parcel, the site of a bank, located within unincorporated King County to the south of South 152nd Street at the southern tip of the annexation area. The annexation would leave this isolated parcel as unincorporated King County entirely surrounded by incorporated arca within the Cities of Tukwila and Sea -Tac. The property owner will have the opportunity to rectify this situation by petitioning for annexation to the City of Tukwila. It is important to the preservation of logical service areas that this parcel be annexed at the time of annexation of the Cascade View area. This decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (3). Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries The boundaries of the modified annexation area primarily follow roadways with direct alignments. One portion of the modified boundary line, the portion approximating the school district line north of South 128th Street, follows property lines. Adjustment to property lines requires minor deviations from straight boundaries, but does not create abnormally irregular boundaries. Omission of a small triangular piece of unincorporated King County at the southern tip of the annexation area leaves an isolated pocket of unincorporated property. This irregularity may be corrected by means of property owner petition for separate annexation to the City of Tukwila. The decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (4). Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities Annexation of the Cascade View area would preclude incorporation as a separate city. The annexation would add approximately 3,000 residents to the City of Tukwila, increasing the current PAGE SEVEN - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 population of approximately 11,000 to approximately 14,000. This annexation would discourage the incorporation of separate small cities of less than 10,000 population in the area. This decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (5). Adjustment of impractical boundaries Annexation of the Cascade View area to the City of Tukwila would fill in a peninsula of unincorporated King County which is impractical from the standpoint of service delivery. The annexation utilizes existing city boundaries on the east and west in order to avoid impractical boundaries. The annexation would place Highway 99 entirely within the jurisdiction of the City of Tukwila, thus eliminating impractical sharing of responsibility between the City of Tukwila and King County. Annexation of Cascade View would adjust the current boundary which splits jurisdiction of Highway 99 and creates service delivery problems.__._ Modification along the school district boundary line includes adjustments to avoid impractical boundaries. The modified boundary follows property lines in order to avoid splitting of parcels impractical from the standpoints of administration and service delivery. The modified boundary is adjusted to avoid inclusion of properties without direct vehicle access from the City of Tukwila, which would be impractical from a service delivery standpoint. Omission from the annexation of a triangular parcel of unincorporated territory at the southern tip of the annexation area results in an impractical boundary. Isolation of a single parcel in King County surrounded by incorporated area in the Cities of Tukwila and Sea -Tac is impractical for provision of services. This situation may be rectified by property owner initiation of annexation. This decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (7). Annexation to cities of unincorporated areas which are urban in character The Cascade View annexation area is a fully developed urban area with established residential neighborhoods and established commercial and institutional uses. The annexation area is urban in character and is designated as urban in the King County Comprehensive Plan. This decision to approve the annexation as modified by deletion of territory tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180 (8). PAGE EIGHT - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Mod.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 - 50 51 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY THAT, for the above reasons, the action proposed in the Notice of Intention contained in said File No. 1622 be, and the same is, hereby modified by deletion of territory as described in Exhibits A and B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. ADOPTED BY SAID WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY by a vote of 6 in favor and 2 against this 11th day of January, 1990, and signed by me in authentication of its said adoption on said date. FILED BY ME this 12th day of January, 1990. az a 1/ ALDA H. WILKINSON, Executive Secretary PAGE NINE - Tukwila /Cascade View .(Apv. /Mod.) WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY . REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY CASCADE VIEW EXHIBIT A Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22, T23N, R4E, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of west 1/4 corner of said Section; thence North 18 °28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 °11'04" West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the north margin of South 128th Street; thence east along said north margin to its intersection with the south line of the southeast quarter of Section 9, T23N, R4E, W.M; thence continuing east along said south line to a point of intersection with a line lying 250 feet (measured perpendicular to) westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South; thence northerly along said parallel line to the south line of the north 34 feet of the north h of the south h of the south 1 of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence continuing northerly along said line which lies 250 feet westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South a distance of 5 feet more or less to a point located opposite station PT 527 + 88.4 on said road centerline; thence N12- 21 -28W a distance of 200.30 feet; ' thence S88- 56 -52W to point which lies 564.93 feet westerly of the west margin of Pacific Hwy South when measured along said line; thence N 00- 05 -43E a distance of 483.93 feet more or less to a point on the south line of tax lot 092304 -9367; thence west to a point which lies 609.72 feet east of the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9 said point being the southeast corner of tax lot 092304 -9034; thence northerly to a point on the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 614.26 feet east of the north- west corner thereof; PAGE TEN - Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv. /Hod.) CASCADE VIEW Exhibit A Page Two PAGE ELEVEN Tukwila /Cascade View (Apv: /l4od: thence east along said north line to a point located 300 feet westerly of the west margin of Pacific Hwy South (distanced measured along said north line); thence northwesterly to a point on the north line of the northeast quarter of' the southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 100 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence east along said north line to the westerly limited access line of PSH No.1 (SR -99); thence generally northerly along said westerly limited access line to its intersection with the south margin of South 116th Way (South 116th Place); thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TUKWILA (Cascade View) COUNCIL DISTRICT KING COUNTY ORD. NO. CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO •Iia ..M Ij1 1• 111 118! ? _1: 1.M 1 Iw • 1V • • .•1 .1 es • slo • 1 : • • • .•" • I; 1 :1 • • • ■■•• • :.••••. ! i • i� t . aa,r 1'. 3 - . ?Ma 7+ 2242Ir •, 1 7P! F +� ; • • t,•ra t 11n ) Zi ® ' srr j1 _ ,lltt•: . . • •�•j. — t 1 1.,. : e i 1 .1 IIA 8117 r rl ONOS, ma ' .1g1s - 1:\ • c. •'l 1 1 1 II•.• •. _ 119: .:11 :IN 4) r 1t ' j1iw.••' IM * � r k • r.! si - 3. .l1•. lava* W SW 1.! s S 1 .I• ti f •r umik �, • • 1 a • . •••M �. . • • Mae 1 • • • 1111 -. • • i g•w 11 .Y10 ,r 'ut • ul. • •••• • I la•• Y la. •• GaM 1 lama 0..1• Sat w. ■-•tort • i.fflfi 1 • { 1 1 • •1••••Y^ t . 1 1 a • l rl... ..•.t - r • i t 4 • rm. 1. 11F {F{ 1 • •l .I1- � 1 j 'n t•. 1 •.y= LAMS .AM at ii e t 4 S�• i • o o !I;1 e c a•• O S, 4 n • •• 1 3l. • :••• • Ic 1 1 :78 1 11 •I. I,1, :I- 1 • , I I • l S Olga 1 ' a\ )' 1 :3+•• I.w. anw • :nu 1. I ' ; t r • aaaa •IM .• tl-• .1r. ` : r 't 1 +.n R1VBB 1 7 • 1: DUWAYISH '.t . • •C7. � • 4 1 _ .t N. • 4,.,.• 1 ...r , nl.•Y 1 \ . 1 • 8 Sr .MM . 1..•• r1M OUWAy1SH N.' : i ., 1 41 21.10;, ' S '?. ;r- t. - a••• I . •! ' a. Et a1 • .tea 2 •111. I • .11r .1a. \.r •_ w •� • aT• :IS omit' 33 t; t 1 t ' I w • 1 . f.• a 814 P ALLENTOWM TUKWILA wr • 312 1 Il•h• 2. • 1 i 1 V•' rl :ter alr ij ijl!J I• 1 1 •.I•• to •. MI. Va. • .•.n •MN N PAGE TWELVE - Tukwila /Cascade View (ADv. /Mod.) EXHIBIT B City of. Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM From: Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner To: Tukwila City Council RE: Cascade View Annexation Boundary Modification by the Ring County Boundary Review Board Date: January 12, 1990 The King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) on January llth, approved the Cascade Annexation to proceed to a vote with modified boundaries as shown on the attached map. The BRB deleted the northwest corner of the annexation because of strong objections voiced at the December public hearing from residents in that area and a developer. Resident objections to Tukwila annexation focused on a reduction in emergency medical response time from the nearby Fire District 11 station . and a stronger connection to the Highline School District. The BRB further reasoned that another annexation petition could be submitted should these residents change their mind in the future. Further Actions Required The remaining annexation actions are shown below. 1. The Tukwila City Council adopts a resolution endorsing the modified boundaries and forwards it to the King County Council. 2. The King County Council adopts a resolution allowing area registered voters to vote on whether to annex or not. 3. An election is held. The estimated election date is May 22, 1990. 4. The Tukwila City Council adopts an ordinance setting the effective date of annexation. AREA EXCLUDED FROM ANNEXATIO BY BRB •.• .. - .v. • '16 EA Pzr tItj tiVE A61- r.7.5:: 04eirt... 14c it, 0, 011P y i v • ' t 1 ' b "OA' • • , qc),. , • 6c3, e, 4ci r .4: - 2 -.1 - • , *.• s • ;44): 1i • •outt in, • • • ' ' ' ;i1f,-.-•••••• • • !,r V.:1 6 * * 3.333•34,1 e-- TY W HWY 99 I ',t:. r •:•• 1 -:: :- -&' t•n•C.:01 A' . • :cc- •-• • • c :Gc5 c-• C • t.„7•14... • It ... • • •: ."."; . •LA .... .1 • ct- C h l iv k••■ ,• •• ;LI l a '- • ' 1 I tZ 1 . k ° t • I - 1 „ • v t • • • r:P• • -4 • • )) 1P4:. . t5 r - • ■ ,.1,3 6 eel _ 0 ,, e V,,c4rvoto 5 /5X., I 4. Ax6 — $ C : .•• .3 .e• tr" „• VIP-7;71 • .3 1.wm r ••,: It •_14';,g'S\ • 0 117% • • ,r71 2,b • y • :71 • , • c r t 113 crs; ; tt. ",";i4., • -- • s % % c, ‘.. ■ • . • • • •D • -e: Er • rTi IF7,7tiqt;D.C '• •- • -f f'; •. • A. • _*°* • • ••••• ' • 11,v(370.4 C.t51 • czer 4 .33.• • ■- , :"fl• .".c) • '•;.P 0. • - . •- V.. .2 • = • . • • •'• •• ° 3-• • ' j 16 7, - .17 . -I - •=i!:•7 , • 4; t - 6, '.'t - cn. I, • 7'1' r — • i•At • • .; 4 I A st) p ;14% - . --; 4 •■= • ;d'T - 17;,Tino .0. • •• o . .: es. . tiO 1 -'' • • 0 . ±=; • • L ..: "" • ••••:j itr■LIW r•IL : 4 I. - Et• „to. L • • -:t lb* „! 1 11.1„2,1_43.,,La',6a,,• t',A 5 vt,. ;1:1 7 ••••!' • - ..• I. . • • I • .;, r c e • C • $ ••= • n 11 4 '..rSiV,6,E,.7. <A ••• • 0-• as • -. " 0 • , e. c D., . "1 : ; •Li ci - DO,".741 . 417/?. 4 3 ,41 1 .. 1 41,t. - • - • .t • C3 • "". . . • ;C'eJAtt.6. 0 6. 3 147 D ° .t ' : • •• /I t .... F TION • , -219 11 .2. 1 .7 • : 1,1411,;•(:-;nlirG,cy.• „.• -4 • ; Fed; ACRE • , , 6 c1 4 tr: r • ' .1).51..a 11 i i(b i c!• 41E3th - PPC:TteP p TEE TR CT P f tol.t_ . 1 • „ , a , 4.4 • . - . • til , ., • ., w i xo t•,, ei•p• . • D b 1 . . NO .S.* CO I v i 7,4 K't - • 1-7-'ZArr"' ......,.....,,..,,...+ ; eat4.. Frs�ass:+ ym.. �nL; uw.,. saznvxv, �r,. s: ��: easuu. cou..,.. aauw. WKt�mwf. e�nvo2�d.. m. aa, mniwmam, aw .as..cr....n,ww. .............. CITY COUNCIL Good evening. I am Marilyn Stoknes, President of the Tukwila City Council. The City Council strongly supports the proposed Cascade View annexation. This support has been demonstrated in its adoption of Resolution 1112 accepting the annexation petition, setting the assessment rate, and directing staff to proceed with all necessary service and land use analyses; and Ordinance 1539 which established pre- annexation zoning. On .behalf of the Tukwila City Council, I ask that you allow this annexation to go forward to a vote as petitioned by area residents. Thank you. ... u . i:'. t;.*: w:'? 7iki!• GxSitvs; s:' wxaHrr.. aw. nM.,. ....,...e...................... oiwmve�ua.3sMIP .78nrg07%C."bRxIanhVnY...es of mrr• ADMINISTRATION Good evening I am John McFarland, City Administrator for the City of Tukwila; speaking on behalf of Mayor Gary Van Dusen. The City's presentation will demonstrate its willingness to annex the Cascade View area, and summarize our public service analysis with respect to the Board's statutory review objectives. Cascade View is the final, in a quartet of annexation petitions initiated by area residents during the summer and fall of 1988. The three other areas have already voted to annex to Tukwila and been absorbed. Only with the completion of the three annexations did Cascade View become contiguous with Tukwila and potentially eligible for an annexation vote. This Board has previously acted to preserve this opportunity when it excluded Cascade View from the Sea -Tac incorporation area; thus allowing residents an opportunity to vote on annexing to Tukwila in accordance with the wishes of the resident petitioners. We are now at that point where the Board is being asked to reaffirm this earlier decision. On behalf of the Tukwila City Administration, I ask you to allow the proposed annexation to go forward to a vote as petitioned by area residents. I would like to now introduce Council Member Marilyn Stoknes, who will be followed by Vernon Umetsu from the Tukwila Dept. of Community Development. "4Srzitt� 'S7�. •: "vy."'c�'tt�! December 29, 1989 Mr. Vernon Umetsu City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 • ..nmiat meter 0643∎ =INPKWWPArsi1311: a'SVatM Dear Vernon: RE: File No. 1622 Cascade View Annexation to the City of Tukwila Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 (206) 296 -7096 Enclosed are copies of two legal descriptions and accompanying maps prepared by Jim Bergsma of the King County Public Works Department for potential Boundary Review Board modifications of the Cascade View annexation area. The legal descriptions are forwarded to you for review by the City of Tukwila prior to Boundary Review Board action. As you know, it is anticipated that any modification of the originally proposed annexation area boundaries would follow the enclosed legal description labeled "School District/Modified by Using Tax Lot Boundaries." A draft resolution will be prepared, as directed by the Board, for modification along the school district boundary, but the Board is aware of the problems associated with use of the school district line. Please let me know if your review reveals need for any corrections to the proposed legal descriptions. Our agenda for the January 11, 1990, Board meeting will be mailed out Friday, January 5, 1990. We would appreciate receiving your input in time to check with Jim Bergsma prior to sending out the agenda. However, changes to the legal description can be made up until the January 11, 1990, meeting date. Thank you again for working with us on the possible modifications. Sincerely, ee � Alda Wilkinson Enclosures: Legal descriptions (2) with maps and cover letter nYisv Tl`?7 CASCADE VIEW (School District Boundary Revision) Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22, T23N, R4E, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 36 corner of said Section; thence North 18 °28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 °11'04" West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the North margin of South 128th Street; thence east along said north margin to its intersection with the south line of the southeast quarter of Section 9, T23N, R4E, W.M.; thence continuing east along said south line to the west line of the east half of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence north along said west line to the south line of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9; thence West to the southwest corner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence north to the northwest corner of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence continuing north along the west line of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of said Section 9 to the South margin of South 116th Way (South 116th Place); thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WP:(ES)D95 1 : • 1 0.200 5115.4 an0 04000 04440 04320 r S CHOOL D1sr41 cr IB pity_ • 03100 ,• 4,3 3100310 33000 :11.5 1. 3 03720 00000 1 ^1 1013 Cpq 3 ,a,_, S. 05300 • 33013 01340 331104 . 03320 •, 133310 - 3151n} 03 300 03200 03300 S 1.>+ 4. 00020 04100 • 04100 04 1 0 07400 •Nv DUWGMISH JCT. RIVERTON a : HEIGHTS a f„ a 1 « S142 , .0 --.7g;;* . :3200 S11-!• 3 11 3 vok V t• ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TUKWILA (Cascade View) . (School District Boundary Revision) COUNCIL DISTRICT KING COUNTY ORD. NO. CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO. 4 1 CASCADE VIEW (School District /Modified By Using Tax Lot Boundaries) Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22, T23N, R4E, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 1 corner of said Section; thence North 18 °28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 °11'04" West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the north margin of South 128th Street; thence east along said north margin to its intersection with the south line of the southeast quarter of Section 9, T23N, R4E, W.M; thence continuing east along said south line to a point of intersection with a line lying 250 feet (measured perpendicular to) westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South; thence northerly along said parallel line to the south line of the north 34 feet of the north 1 of the south 1 of the south 1 of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9; thence continuing northerly along said line which lies 250 feet westerly of and parallel with the centerline of Pacific Hwy South a distance of 5 feet more or less to a point located opposite station PT 527 + 88.4 on said road centerline; thence N12- 21 -28W a distance of 200.30 feet; thence S88- 56 -52W to point which lies 564.93 feet westerly of the west margin of Pacific Hwy South when measured along said line; thence N 00- 05 -43E a distance of 483.93 feet more or less to a point on the south line of tax lot 092304 -9367; thence west to a point which lies 609.72 feet east of the west line of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 9 said point being the southeast corner of tax lot 092304 -9034; thence northerly to a point on the north line of said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 614.26 feet east of the north- west corner thereof; CASCADE VIEW December 22, 1989 Page Two thence east along said north line to a point located 300 feet westerly of the west margin of Pacific Hwy South (distanced measured along said north line); thence northwesterly to a point on the north line of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 9 which is located 100 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence east along said north line to the westerly limited access line of PSH No.1 (SR -99); thence generally northerly along said westerly limited access line to its intersection with the south margin of South 116th Way (South 116th Place); thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WP:(ES)D96 • 1 111...• 1 " 1' 04100 04140 04120* • 04120 2100)214 7:r 11740 ¢ • t $101 t 04170 04000 R* 1. 0) )40 t I a II o, 0.440 • o411w _ >' 1 1 $47, 1 • etR :'^ : / t« _ I.r I41•- 4.1 1t1'0 05360 17.. at 07220 ° 011)0 2031104 14004 01774 – 11Hr 0))60 0))110 04100 00100 1 1 0 1 it 1 t!v .11 20 101. 1. x420 1 II'•• s n •4 t '0 07160 DUWAMISH 111' 4• t» tiSe �7 °t ' ALLENTOWN° " I — 1. 7 1:•••L 7r — ........ • 11)7' t $7•••4. 00440 ANNEXATION TO Crry OF TUK►WILA (Cascade View) COUNCIL DISTRICT 1 District /Modified by using tax lot lines) KING COUNTY ORD. NO. CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO. • Field No. LE -17 NAME Historic Military Road Common Military Road KING COUNTY HISTORIC SITES SURVEY Inventory Sheet LOCATION Number & Street Militar"" Road - see below City or Town Incorporated File No. Site No. 0116 Not for Publication Zip Unincorporated X Community name South King County Congressional District .6, 7 Community Planning District Highline. Federal Way State Legislative District31,33,300oning Multiple Zoning County Council District 7 Shoreline Environment CLASSIFICATION . CATEGORY _District _Building (s) _Structure X Historic Site _Arc. Site _Object OWNER OF PROPERTY: OWNERSHIP X ^ Public Private Both Number & Street o,t City or Town Seattle LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec Twn PRESENT REGISTER STATUS Nat. Register Other DESCRIPTION CONDITION _Excellent Good Fair i Deteriorated Ruins Unexposed ACCESSIBLE X Yes Restricted Yes Unrest. No SITUATION Unaltered X Altered King County — State Register X Original Site X Moved Date PRESENT & ORIG. PHYSICAL APPEARANCE STATUS X Occupied Unoccupied — Preservation - -Work in Progress Threatened by: Demolition _Neglect Rng — (TL State PRESENT — Agriculture Commercial Educational Wa. Entertainment Government Industrial Military Other USE Museum Park Private — Residence _ Religious Scientific XTransportation Zip ORina The Military Road through Southern King County begins on the north bank of the Puyallup River at the steel bridge where Carson's Ferry once operated. There is now a monument at that point noting the location. From the monument, the road follows the meridan line four miles north until it branches to the northeast at approximately the King County line. From here it winds northward between Federal Way and Auburn and through the Highline area until it fades into Des Moines Way at S. 113th Avenue. Des Moines Wag fades into 14th Avenue S. which then fades into Highway 99 approximately 26 miles from the monument. This point is near the south shore of the Duwamish River close to the original L. M. Collins Donation Claim. The earl: road meandered around trees and through the underbrush taking the line of least_ resistence. Later the road was widened to about eight feet and was of the "pu- :cheon" type - split cedar loss or slabs with one smooth side, laid like railroad ties over long poles which sank in the mud. Today, the road is paved and closely follows its original route. SIGNIFICANCE Builder (s) U. S. Governmynt and_zet„ ter. Architect(s) and /or Engineer(s) Date(s) Built 1853 -1860 Most Significant Period 1853- 1890's Present Level of Significance: National x_State _ Local STATEMENT OF HISTORY & SIGNIFICANCE In 1853, Congress appropriated $30,000 for a military road from Fort Steilacoom to Bellingham. This was one of three territorial roads established by the legislature for use by the military. . Thurston County Court Commissioners appointed William N. Bell, L. M. Collins, and John Chapman to be road viewers on March 23, 1853. They proposed a road south out of Seattle to L. M. Collin's place on the Duwamish River, crossing here and continuing upon the south ridge along the points, overlooking White River Valley to within one mile of Adam Benston's claim•(Section 21, 22 of Range 4E) and then crossing the Puyallup River and following the road west to Steilacoom Creek and into Fort Steilacoom. In 1854, the King County committee composed of Thomas Mercer, Henry Van Asselt and Richard Tobin were in favor of a road connecting with the 'immigrant road "from Naches Pass to White River Valley so that settlers would be headed in the direction of Seattle. This proposed road ran from the John Thomas claim at Duwamish (at Riverside) to that of Joseph Foster, proceeding down the south side of the Duwamish to the ferry crossing, up the north side of the river and east to the.320 acre claim of Henry Van Asselt (today the site of Boeing Field). In 1854, construction was started on the road, approximately following the route recommended by the Thurston County viewers the preceding year. The Indian Wars of 1855 -56, which struck more heavily upon King County than any other part of the territory, brought a halt to road construction. But it reemphasized the necessity of a road for protection against the Valley Indians and as a means for the soldiers from the forts to travel more quickly. In 1857, Congress appropriated $35,000 for the military road from Steilacoom to Bellingham. Most of the previous road had returned to its natural state and had to be redone. All but the last eight miles of it, from Puyallup to Duwamish, was completed by 1858. Vaugh and Howell contracted to build that portion of the road between the Puyallup River and Seattle, a distance of about miles, but the Secretary of War annulled the contract. The contractors, previous to the receipt of the notification, had completed 204 miles, leaving eight miles south of Seattle unimproved. The road was completed in 1860. • Although the road was built for military Trails were made from Military Road to property would take up where one road ended and continue of the early roads in the southern part of King played a significant role in opening up much of BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Bagley, Clarence B. History of King County, Vol. I. S. J. Clarke Publishing Company, Chicago- Seattle. 1929. Beaver, Lowell J. Historic Memories from Monuments and Plaques of Western Washington. 1960. • Draper, Melanie. Timber, Tides, and Tales. 1975. Sponsored by Des Moines Library League and Bicentennial Committee. Eyler, Melba and Yeager, Evelyn A. The Many Roads to Highline. Highline Publishing Company, Seattle, Wa. 1972. Washington State Historical Society Marker. 1925. Monument at Steilacoom entrance. FORM PREPARED BY (PRINT): L$nda ,lkin Signature /.:'`7 f ..d ! 4'•; • Date 11 - 97 - 77 Organization _ 5.1n? Count» ili tnrir siteq Snrupy Address purposes, it was primarily used by settlers. of various settlers. The next homesteader it on to his property. This is how many County began. Thus, the Military Road this area. Phone (•n6) 2R4_ec56 Field pro. Historic Commn KING COUNTY HISTORIC SITES SURVEY Inventory Sheet Robert Thomasson Residence Robert Nash Residence LOCATION Number & Street 2434 S. 116th Way City or Town Seattle, WA Incorporated Unincorporated x Community Congressional District 7 State Legislative District 37 Zoning County Council District —1— Shoreline CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY District x Building (s ) Structure - Historic Site - - Arc. Site Object OWNERSHIP Public x Private PHOTO OR SITE MAP Bo th ACCESSIBLE Yes Restricted x Yes Unrest. No City or Town • Prudoe Bay STATUS x Occupied Unoccupied __Preservation Work in P rcgres s Threatened by: __Demolition Neglect OWNER OF PROPERTY Robert Nash c/o Nana Manning, Inc. (Tenant: Cindy Mickelson) • Number & Street Arlo Mcc Pouch 0019 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec 9 Twn 23 R-mg 4 (TL 3 File No. 0657 Site No. Not for Publication Zip 98168 name Planning District Highline RS 7200 Environment PRESENT USE Agriculture Commercial Educational . Entertainment Government Industrial f'ilitary Other State Alaska t'.'.Y. Zip 99734 Major -Minor #: 092304 -9003 BEG 919.10 FT S OF NW COR OF GL 1 TH N 89 -43 -38.4 E 58.59 FT TH N 55 -59 -45 E 91.50 FT TO TPOB TH N 55 -59 -45 =18.50 FT TH N 35 -43 -06 E 86.66 FT TH S 80 -11 -40 E 50.50 FT TH S O4 -21 -20 E TO NLY MGN OF RD TH WLY ALG RD TO PT S 27 -40 -00 E OF TPOB TH N 27- 40-00 W TO TPOB PRESENT REGISTER STATUS Nat. Register State Register Other DESCRIPTION CONDITION: x Excellent Good Fair Deteriorated Ruins Unexposed SITUATION: x Unaltered altered x Original Site _ loved, Date • :tseum Park Private Residence __Religious Scientific Transportation. PPESErTT & ORIG. PHYSICAL APPEARANCE The Robert Thomasson Residence is a two story structure exhibiting Italian Renaissance styling which is constructed of multi - colored rock faced sandstone and granite blocks and exhibits a square plan with two rectangular, one - story, projecting wings on either side (east and west) of the main portion of the residence. The square portion of the residence is capped by a low- pitched hip roof covered with red tile and each wing exhibits a gable roof covered with red tile. The east wing also features an extension on its east facade which exhibits a rectangular plan and shed roof covered with red tile. The residence features metal casement windows which exhibit brick sills and are capped by either brick soldier courses or radiating brick arches. The front facade also features a recessed, arcaded, entry porch. The west facade features three, round decorative ornaments on the second story level. There is a garage to the rear (north) of the residence which has been converted to a rental residential unit. King County property records from 1940 illustrate the building has not experienced alterations. S ICzvi: ICA:1E Builder(s) STA Architect Engineer (s) and/or Enginees) Robert Thomasson Date(s) Built 1934 Present Level of Significance: Most Significant Period _ National State x Local Di a OF HISTORY & SIGNIFICANCE A number of small communities evolved south of the City of Seattle in King County along the Duwamish River in the later half of the 19th century and during the first part of the 20th century. These included Foster, Allentown, Riverton, and Tukwila. Other similar settlements sprang up to the east such as Sunnydale. A first movement of settlement in many of these areas occurred with donation and homestead claims in the 1850's to 1870's. Early settlers included the Milton Robbins, James Steele, and Michael Kelly families; the early settlement pattern was dispersed farmsteads with agriculture as the primary economic pursuit. The most prominent of these early arrivals was Joseph Foster. Born in Hamilton, Ontario Canada in 1828, Foster spent his youth in Ohio, where he apprenticed as a tailor, and elsewhere in the midwest. In 1852, he and his brother, Stephen, decided to head west; they arrived in the Seattle vicinity in 1853 after spending some time in California and Oregon. Both brothers took up claims along the Duwamish River. Joseph Foster eventually achieved prominence as a legislator, serving in the Washington Territorial Legislature beginning in 1858 for twenty -two years. In this role, he was instrumental in the movement to have the State University located in Seattle; obtained passage of legislation to construct a military road from Seattle via the Snoqualmie Pass to Fort Colville, the first such road over the mountains; and supported the women's suffrage movement. When not in Olympia, Foster raised dairy cattle on his land in the Duwamish Valley. A second period of development in these communities occurred in the early years of the 20th century with the development of the electric commuter trolley line, the Inter- urban, and with the simultaneous movement away from the evils of the city. With easy access to the industrializing area of South Seattle, private developers invested in land in the Allentown, Riverton, Foster, and Tukwila communities and promoted and marketed lots with claims of clean suburban living close to jobs in Seattle, Developers included individuals such as C.D. Hillman, who promoted real estate ventures in King County and the Puget Sound region, and companies such as the South Seattle Land Company; acreage was platted under such names as Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, Riverside Interurban' Tracts, South Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts, and the Brookdale Garden Tracts. While some of the areas eventually developed isolated commercial or industrial enterprises and often churches, schools or other social institutions, the primary focus of these communities became suburban and residential in nature. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES Anderson Map Co., Inc., Atlas of King County, Seattle, WA: Anderson Map Co., Inc., 426 Eppler Block, 1907. Bagley, Clarence B., History of King County, Washington, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Company, Vol 1: 280, 743 -764, 867 -868, 1929. Des Moines, Wa, Des Moines Zenith Historical Museum collections, Consolidated South District Commercial Club publication, "Seattle's South District A Pictorial Study ", 1930. Eyler, Melba and Evelyn Yeager, The Many Roads to Highline, Seattle: Times Print - shop, Special Edition, 1979. Kincaid, Stanley, Bellingham, WA, Interview, December 3, 1985. (Robert Thomasson's nephew) FOPM PREPARED BY (PRINT) Karen Bean Signature Date December 1985 Organize:e on King County Office of Historic Preservation Address E18 Second Avenue, 805 Alaska hiildine?y (206) 587 -4P68 Seattle, WA 98104 #0657 Robert Thomasson Residence Significance (continued) The earliest known owner of the land in Section Thomasson residence is located was James McKinl atlases, by circa 1915 the Duwamish Investment was probably among the other developers investi during this era of early suburbanization. By 1 subdivided into smaller parcels and by 1940 thi an unrecorded owner or developer, Webster Homes Robert Thomasson began construction on his unus with the Washington State Highway Department, T assistance, the residence himself. Thomasson a (west) to his property. Robert Nash is the pro the property sometime after Thomasson's death i Bibliography (continued) Kroll Map Co., Inc., Atlas of King County, Scat 413 Melhorn Bldg., 1930. Kroll Map Co., Inc., Atlas of King County, Seat 413 Melhorn Bldg., c 1915 -1920. Metsker, Charles F., Atlas of King County Seatt Engineer, 1020 Third Ave., c 1040. "Pioneer Foster Bothers Headed West by Wagon ju July 31, 1952. Renton, WA, Renton Historical Museum, Flora F. Honorable Joseph Foster," 1930, copied by Renton, WA, Renton Historical Museum, Morda Sla Duwamish," n.d. Seattle, WA, Highline School District Museum, E 1968. Mickelson, Cindy, Seattle, WA, Interview, Noverr 9, Township 23, Range 4 where the Robert y as of 1907. According to King County ompany owned the property; this company g and reselling property south of Seattle 30, atlases show the property had been area of Section 9 was listed under al residence in 1934. A project engineer homasson designed and built, with some lso constructed the residence next door perty's current owner who purchased n the early 1980's. tle, WA: Kroll Map Co., tle, WA, Kroll Map Co., le, WA: Charles F. Metsker, Civil st 100 Years Ago," Renton News Record, Foster manuscript, "Sketch of Life of Morda Slauson, 1954. uson manuscript, "Long Ago on sther Balzarini Manuscript, "Our Burien," ber 7, 1985. Field No. NAME Historic Common Duwamish 99 Bridae (K.C. Bridge #3215) LOCATION Number & Street Old Highway 99 over Duwamish River City or Town Incorporated Unincorporated x Community name Congressional District 7 Community Planning District Highline State Legislative District 33 Zoning - County Council District 8 Shoreline Environment CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY District Building (s) x ` Structure _ Historic Site _ Arc. Site Object Zip OWNERSHIP x Public Private Both ACCESSIBLE Yes Restricted x Yes Unrest. No OWNER OF PROPERTY: King County Department of Public Works Number & Street 900 Administration Building City or Town Seattle State WA LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec 9 Twn 23 Rng 4E (TL PRESENT REGISTER STATUS Nat. Register _ State Register x Other WA State BricigP Tnventnry DESCRIPTION Category II CONDITION x Excellent Good Fair _ Deteriorated x Original Site _Ru ins Moved _ Unexposed Date SITUATION x Unaltered Altered PRESENT & ORIG. PHYSICAL APPEARANCE KING COUNTY HISTORIC SITES SURVEY . Inventory Sheet STATUS Occupied Unoccupied Preservation --Work in Progress Threatened by: x Demolition X Neglect PRESENT USE Agriculture — Museum _Commercial _Park Educational Private _ Entertainment — Residence _Government _Religious _Industrial _Scientific Military x_Transportation — Other File No. 0823 Site No. Not for Publication Zip 98104 PHOTO OR SITE MAP -The-Duwamish 99 Bridge located on Old Highway 99 over the Duwamish River is a four - lane, vehicular, 200 foot, steel, riveted Pratt (Parker sub -type, Camelback variation) through truss with concrete abutments. Its overall length is 205 feet with a roadway width of 48 feet curb to curb. It is more typical of later truss construction; its members are heavier and it was originally built with a deck structure consisting of steel stringers surfaced with concrete. It is located in a urbanized area of unincorpo- rated King County south of the City of Seattle. The Duwamish 99 Bridge has had a number of its sway frames and braces straightened and painted since the bridge was turned over to King County by the State of Washington Highway Department (Department of Transportation) in 1971. Most recently, in 1981 steel portals and sway frames were replaced. SIGNIFICANCE Builder(s) Washington State Highway Dept. (Department of Transportation) J.A. McEachren, Architect(s) and /or Engineer(s) Contractor Date(s) Built 1923 Present Level of Significance; Most Significant Period National State x Local STATEMENT OF HISTORY & SIGNIFICANCE The Duwamish 99 Bridge is one of 10 steel, Pratt (Barker sub -type, camelback variation) truss bridges owned and maintained by King County and built pre -1945. The Bridge was constructed by the State Highway Department (Department of Transportation) in 1927 -28 under the guidance of Samuel Humes, State Highway Engineer with the J. A. McEachern Company selected as contractor. The Pratt truss was patented in 1E44 by Thomas and Caleb Pratt. This truss type, •which became one of the two most commonly used bridge designs in the early twentieth century, exhibits ve:.tical members acting in compression and diagonals acting in tension. Variations of this basic form evolved which retained the basic configuration of the truss but altered the shape of the top and bottom chords. One of these variations, the Parker truss, exhibits the typical Pratt truss configuration of members, but its top chord is polygonal in shape. This configuration change, while providing a stronger truss than the Pratt using the same amount of material, results in a more expensive structure since the memebers of a Parker truss are not as uniform in size. A variation of the Parker, known as the camelback truss, exhibits an arched top chord with five slopes. "This design allowed for greater standardization of its members and better stress distribution, and it was often the most economical truss for many railroad and highway spans." The Duwamish 99 Bridge is a camelback truss. It is one of 10 steel Pratt trusses owned and maintained by King County; it is one of five Parkers and is the only example of the Parker variation known as the camelback truss. 1 American Association for State and Local History Technical Leaflet 95, History News, Vol 32, No. 5, May, 1977. Bridge Truss Types: a guide to dating and identifying. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES American Association for State and Local History Technical Leaflet 95, History News, Vol 32, No. 5, May, 1977. Bridge Truss Types: a guide to dating and identifying. Mallery, Paul, Bridge and Trestle Handbook, Boyton and Associates, Clifton, VA, pgs 11 -18, 1976. Interviews with John Bordon, Bridge Engineer, King County Dept. of Public Works, 900 Admin. Bldg., Seattle, WA, Feb. - April, 1985. King County Dept. of Public Works, bridge files and plans, 900 Admin. Bldg., Seattle, WA. Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation bridge inventory filer and "at onal Register Thematic Nomination, "Histor.. Bridges and Tunnels in Washington State," by Lisa Soderberg, Olympia, WA, 1980. FORM PREPARED BY (PRINT): Karen Bean Signature Date Organization __ _Office of Historic Preservation Address 805 Alaska Bldg., 612 Second Avenue, Seattle, WA 9810/Phone 587 -4858 Fiald :.D. Historic :..: e.^. :: Sheet = L. Mayer Residence Johanna Mayer Residence Common LOCATION Number & Street City or Town Incorporated Unincorporated x Community name Congressional District 7 Community Planning District State Legislative District 33 Zoning B -C County Council District g-----Shoreline Environment CLASSIFICATION CATEGORY District X Building (s) - Structure - _Historic Site - - Arc. Site O bject OWNER OF PROPERTY: .umber & Street City or Town P ?.F�SrNT ?EGIS'i E'R Nat. Register DE.SCRI?r: O'l CONDITICI: S lIIM ION : PHOTO OR SITE MAP • OWNERSHIP Public IPrivate Both ACCESSIBLE X Yes Restricted ' :es Unrest. d o Seattle. STATUS S Register X Excellent Unaltered 15025 Military Seattle, WA Johanna Mayer pPESEIT & ORIG. PHYSICAL APPS :7 Rd S. 15025 Military urT STATUS xCccupied unoccupied ?riser-: ation work in Progress Threatened by: Demolition _ :neglect LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec 22 17 1,21 Rnc 4 (TL Major -Minor 11: 004100 -0395 LOT 5 BLOCK 3 ADAMS HOME TRS 1ST ADD TAX POR THRU .389 NOT INCL. Other State WA File No- 0664 Site No. Not for Publication Zip 98168 Highline PRESENT USE Agriculture Commercial - Educational -- Entertainment - Government - Industrial - Military Other A seum ?ark Private Residence Religious Scientific Transportation Zlo 9Rl,SR PARTIALLY EX UNDER RCW 84.36. 381 Good Fair Deteriorated Ruins Unexposed — Altered x Or ig Site _'c• ;e , .ate The L. Mayer Residence is a two -story structure which exhibits Tudor styling; an irregular L-shaped plan; a concrete foundation; brick veneer exterior wall surfaces; and a steeply pitched multiple cross gable roof, covered with wood shingles, which also features vergeboards with a scalloped design and a number of gable and shed dormers. The residence also features a variety of window types including wood case- ment windows with single panes; wood casement windows with multiple pane glazing; and fixed sash windows with multiple leaded panes in geometric patterns. Some of these windows and /or window surrounds also feature Tudor or flattened, pointed arches. The residence's to in entrance door is located in a short tower with a conical roof covered with slate. The residence also features a large exterior brick chimney with two chimney pots on the south facade. King County property records from 1940 illustrate the residence does not appear to have experienced alterations• .eince that time. Prior to 1940, the structure appears to have experienced a phase during its initial construction wherein it exhibited paper and 7 -uil der ( s ) ch.isect(s) and/or Engineer(s) late(s) Built 1935 Present Level of Si ;ra'i= a.^ce: : bst Significant Period _ National State x t. c .il STATEMENT CF HIS RY 6 SIGNIFICANCE A number of small communities evolved south of the City of Seattle in King County along. the Duwamish River in the latter half of the 19th century and during the first part of the 20th century. These included Foster, Allentown, Riverton, and Tukwila. Other similar settlements, such as Sunnydale, sprang up to the east. A first movement of settlement in many of these areas o:csrred with donation and hcmestead claims in the 1850's to 1870's. Early settlers included the Milton Robbins, James Steele, and Michael Kelly families. The early settlement pattern was dispersed farmsteads with agriculture as the primary economic pursuit. The most prominent of these early arrivals was Joseph Foster. Born in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada in 1828, Foster spent his youth in Ohio, where he apprenticed as a tailor, and elsewhere in the midwest. In 1852, he and his brother, Stephen, decided to head west. They arrived in the Seattle vicinity in 1853 after spending some time in California and Oregon. Both brothers took up claims along the Duwamish River. Joseph Foster eventually achieved prominence as a legislator, serving in the Washington Territorial Legislature beginning in 1858 for twenty -two years. In this role, he was instrumental in the movement to have the State University located in Seattle; obtained passage of legislation to construct a military road frcm Seattle via the Snoqualmie ?ass to Fort Colville, the first such road over the mountains; and supported the women's suffrage movement. When not in Olympia, Foster also raised dairy cattle on his land in the Duwamish Valley. A second period of development in these communities occurred in the early years of the 20th century with the development of the electric commuter trolley line, the Interurban, and with the simultaneous movement away frcm the evils of the city. With easy access to the industrializing area of South Seattle, crivate developers invested in land in the Allentown, Riverton, Foster, and 7 communities and promoted and marketed lots with claims of clean suburban 1i7 : close to jobs in Seattle. Developers included individuals such as C.D. Hillman, who promoted real estate ventures in King County and the Puget Sound region, and companies such as the South Seattle Land Company. Acreage was platted under such such names as Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, Riverside Interurban Tracts, South Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts, and the Brookdale Garden Tracts. While some of the areas eventually developed isolated commercial or industrial enterprises and often churches, schools or other social institutions, the primary fccus of these communities became suburban and residential in nature. n:BLZOGRAFHICAL REFS:FENCES Anderson Map Company, Inc., Atlas of King County, Seattle, WA: Anderson Map Co., Inc., 426 Eppler Block, 1907. Bagley, Clarence B., History of King County, Washington, Chicago: S.J. Clarke Publishing Company, Vol. 1 :280, 743 - 764, 867 -868, 1929. Eyler, Melba and Evelyn Yeager, The Many Roads to Highline, Seattle: Times Printshop, Speci =.1 Edition, 1979. Kroll Map Co., Inc., Atlas of King County, Seattle, WA: Kroll Man 413 Melhorn Bldg., c1915 -1920. Kroll Map Co., Inc., Atlas of King County, Seattle, WA: Kroll Map Co., 413 Melhorn Bldg., 1930. "Pioneer Foster Brothers Head West By Wagon Just 100 Years Agc," Renton News Record, July 31, 1952. FCRM PPEPAFED BY TRIG): Karen Bea._ Signature Date December 1985 Cr:Ta .ration Office of Historic Preservation flrpus 6;; Second Avenue, 805 Alaska t..dg phone 587 -4858 zeattle, .,r, gb y 0664 L. Mayer Residence Appearance (continued) horizontal wood (shiplap) siding and its roof was covered with copper sheeting. There are property records from this earlier period; it appears the building may have stood unfinished for a while and was later completed with brick veneer exterior walls and a wood shingled roof. Significance (continued) The L. Mayer Residence is located on the Military Road, the first road in King County. Constructed between 1853 and 1860, the Military Road eventually connected King County to parts north, south and east since segments extended to Bellingham, Steilacoom, and Fort Walla Walla. The land in Section 22 Township 23 Range 4 just east of Tukwila was known, at least as early as 1907, as the Adams Home Tracts. According to a King County atlas from that date, the northern half of Section 22 was listed as the Adams Home Tracts and the Adams Home Tracts First and Second Additions. By at least 1912, the vicinity, which was located between Riverton and Sunnydale, was known as Riverton Heights and had a population of 200. A local King County directory from that date listed a number of ranchers and farmers living in the area; the largest commercial enterprise and a key employer appeared to be Reliable Ladder Works, which was located on the Military Road. By 1930, according to another King County atlas, the 1 Adams Home Tracts were divided into numerous small lots. The earliest known owner of the property where the Residence is located, according to King County property records, was Joseph Heller as of 1929. These records also indicate, however, that construction on the residence did not begin until 1935. As indicated under the physical description and as evidenced by King County property records, the structure appears to have experienced an early construction phase and a later phase during which time the structure was completed. As of 1930, L. Mayer took title to the property; the property records seem to indicate that it was during Mayer's ownership that the structure was completed. No other information has been ascertained concerning L. Mayer. There is cabinet shop located on a separate tax lot in front (northeast) of the residence now operated by L. Mayer's son, Rudolph Mayer. It is probable this was originally L. Mayer's business. The property has remained in the Mayer family; Johanna Mayer, L. Mayer's widow, retains title. Bibliography (continued) Metsker, Charles F., Atlas of King County, Seattle, WA: Charles F. Metsker, Civil Engineer, 1020 Third Ave., c1940. R.L. Polk & Co., Inc., King County Directory, Vol. 1911 -1912, Seattle: R.L. Polk & Co., 426 -430, Globe Block, 1912. Renton, WA, Renton Historical Museum, Flora F. Foster Manuscript, "Sketch of the Life of Honorable Joseph Foster," 1930, copied by Morda Slauson, 1954. Renton, WA, Renton Historical Museum, Morda Slauson Manuscript, "Long Ago on Duwamish," n.d. Seattle, WA, Highline School District Museum, Esther Balzarini manuscript, "Our Burien," 1968. December 20, 1989 Mr. Vernon Umetsu City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 SUBJECT: File No. 1622 City of Tukwila Cascade View Annexation Dear Vernon: Enclosed at your request is a copy of the proposed boundary modification for Cascade View, for which Jim Bergsma in King County Public Works is preparing a legal description. Please let me know if there appear to be any problems with this proposed boundary line. Sincerely, Alda Wilkinson Enclosure C 27 1989 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 1 A/q" ihr4w414 14' -eMilr w�� frail/ 40 ��,�� l Jam/ � GZ UG9'�" King County Records and Elections Division Election Section 553 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296 -1565 December 11, 1989 TO: RE: Dates for 1990 Elections in King County *NOTE: This information amends a similar letter sent earlier. R.C.W. 29.13.020 requires that authorized Special Elections must be held on one of the following dates: For 1990 the Election dates are: a. February 6, 1990 b. March 13, 1990 c. April 3, 1990 d. May 22, 1990* e. September 18, 1990 f. November 6, 1990 If the voters of your city /district fail to pass a special levy or bond issue on the Special Election the first time, the law allows that a second election can be called at any time thereafter. In emergency cases of fire, flood, earthquake, or other acts of God, Special Elections can be held at any time. An exception is that, other than the primary and general election, no elections shall be held between the fourth Monday of July and the third Wednesday of November, (July 23rd through November 21, 1990). * This is a change resulting from the passage of the Presidential Preference Primary Bill (Chapter 4, Laws of Washington 1989). Form E•47 City /Town Clerks School District Superintendents Minor Taxing District Commissioners a. 1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday in February. b. 2nd Tuesday in March. c. 1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday in April. d. 4th Tuesday in May. * e. Primary Election - 3rd Tuesday in September (or seven Tuesdays before the General Election. f. General Election - 1st Tuesday after the 1st Monday in November. Last day for Resolutions /Ordinances calling for the Special Election to be submitted to the Election Dept. December 22, 1989 January 26, 1990 February 16, 1990 April 6, 1990 August 3, 1990 September 21, 1990 In the past this has caused some confusion, and the following will provide clarification: JJB /bs 1. Resolutions calling for Special Elections must be presented to the Election Section of the Division, specifically directed to the Super- intendent of Elections, 553 King County Administration Building. They should not be recorded or filed. 2. All resolutions, orders, notices, agreements, contracts, etc. NOT PERTAINING TO THE SCHEDULING OF AN ELECTION may be recorded as provided in the R.C.W.'s. 3. Upon presentation of a resolution /ordinance calling for a Special Election, the resolution /ordinance will be reviewed by the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney and the Office of the Assessor for accuracy as to content and form. Upon completion of this review, the Election Section will return a written acknowledgement along with an order calling for the Special Election, signed by the Manager of Records and Elections. If within 10 days after the presentation of your resolution /ordinance you do not receive the acknowledgement mentioned above, immediately contact the Superintendent of Elections by telephone at 296 -1573. Please note that R.C.W. 29.27.060 limits the number of words that can be used in a ballot title. The statute states that a proposition must not exceed seventy -five words. For your own protection, we suggest that an effort be made to conform to the law. The Records and Elections Division is in the process of developing standardized language for common types of ballot measures. If you or your counsel have language you would like to have considered during this process, please submit it to this office to the attention of the Superintendent of Elections. If you have further questions regarding this information, please contact Bob Bruce, Superintendent of Elections, 296 -1565. Sincerely, PE 'L444— James J. Buck, Acting Manager Division of Records and Elections N ,' City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor From: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, D.C.D. To: Mayor and Tukwila City Council RE: Ring County Boundary Review Board Review of Cascade View Annexation. Date: December 6, 1989 MEMORANDUM The King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) held a public hearing on the evening of December 5th at the Cascade View Elementary School. Presentations were made by City staff; County staff; and annexation proponents and opponents. Annexation opponents comprised about 50% of the private speakers; and were all grouped in the northwest corner of the Cascade area. Opposition was based on less emergency medical service and zoning. Annexation proponents were strongly in favor of annexing to Tukwila, but voiced no significant objections to excluding the northwest area. They were very opposed to moving the boundary south of 128th Street. The BRB directed their staff to prepare two resolutions (a) modifying the boundary to the South Central School District boundary -- thus excluding the northwest area from annexation and (b) approving the existing annexation boundary. The BRB will deliberate these resolutions at their meeting on January llth. A City service analysis of the modified boundary will be completed prior to the BRB review of these resolutions. If the Cascade boundaries are modified, the following steps must occur: 1. City Council approval or denial of the modified annexation. 2. County Council establishes an election date. County Records and Elections Office sets an election date -- earliest is April 3, latest is May 15. South Central 4640 SOUTH 144th STREET Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Dear Board Members: SCHOOL DISTRICT 408 K I N G COUNTY • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 -4196 • Phone: 244 -2100 November 29, 1989 I am writing on behalf of the South Central School District to summarize the main reasons why the school district endorses the annexation proposal for Cascade View to join the City of Tukwila. South Central School District is a unique, small school district with an area of approximately 7.5 square miles and has four schools located in the City of Tukwila and one, Cascade View, located in unincorporated King County. With only one high school, Foster High School, the district has been able to provide an identity for both the City of Tukwila and the unincorporated King County communities located within the school district boundaries. It would be highly desirable to permit the Cascade View annexation proposal in order to preserve these natural neighborhoods and communities so they are part of one city government unit and one school district. Annexation of the Cascade View area into Tukwila would add the remaining school district attendance area and school into Tukwila, leading to coterminous school district and city boundaries. This alignment between the school district and the City of Tukwila would be preferable to the continued fragmentation of the school district between the City of Tukwila and unincor- porated King County. The area to be annexed would create and preserve a logical service area for the City of Tukwila, aligning the South Central School District with the boundaries of the city. The current arrangement of having South Central School District split between Tukwila and unincorporated King County makes it difficult and impractical to oonduot busineaa with two local governments. Annexation provides the opportunity to combine abnormally irregular boundaries and adjust impractical boundaries by aligning the school district and the City of Tukwila. Another main reason for endorsing the annexation petitions is that annexation would allow a cooperative arrangement of school programs between the City of Tukwila and South Central Schools to be expanded to all five achools in South Central School District. Rather than splitting programs, annexation would allow Tukwila programs in the areas of drug prevention, fire prevention, parks and recreation programs and career education programs to be part of each school in the South Central School District. If the entire school district were contained in the City of Tukwila a beneficial, 000perative relationship would continue and be further expanded. We believe that these annexation proposals meet the standards and objectives which guide Boundary Review Board decisions. First, the proposed annexations Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County November 29, 1989 Page two would preserve natural neighborhoods and communities within one school district and one city government. Second, the areas to be annexed would create and preserve logical service areas for the City of. Tukwila. Third, annexation would prevent abnormally irregular boundaries and adjust im- practical boundaries by aligning the school district and the City of Tukwila. And fourth, the City of Tukwila which has a demonstrated record of high quality municipal services, has provided reasonable assurance that it will extend its municipal services into the newly annexed areas. This would be especially important in the area of police protection along Pacific Highway which runs through the school district. We urge the King County Boundary Review Board to approve the election method annexation requested in the Cascade View annexation petitions. This proposed annexation will enhance both the community and the school district leading to a' stronger, cohesive, and safer community. Thank you for your consideration.' MS:mm Copy - South Central Board of Directors King County Council Tukwila City Council Sincerely, Michael Silver, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools :Gl�[.'.tihti AF�'tDAVI WENDY BULL hereby Eij Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Ei Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on Tuesday, November 28, 1989. , 19 . SEE ATTACHED: & MAYOR File Number 89 -2 -A Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION OF DISTR( BUTION declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance [l Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Other (] Other CityOf Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 12061 433-1800 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor November 27, 1989 Dear Annexation Petitioner and Zoning Task Force Member, This is to notify you that the Ring County Boundary Review Board will hold a public .. hearing on the Cascade View annexation. The Board will take testimony on the Cascade View boundaries and conditions of annexation. An area map is shown on the reverse side. Testimony from you and all other interested parties will be taken at the Boundary Review Board's public hearing to be held: Sincere December 5, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. Cascade View Elementary School Multi- Purpose Roos 13601 32nd Avenue So. The Boundary Review Board will either: allow the annexation to be voted on as petitioned by area residents, modify the boundary before allowing a vote, or prohibit a vote from occurring. Please: feel free to call the Ring County Boundary Review Board (296 -7096) or Vernon Umetsu of my staff (433 -1858) if you have any questions. . Rick = =- =r, Director Dept. of Community Development --- ilLr.►En 11=1. .� ..... • L • CASCADE VIEW S 128th Tukwila City Limits LEGEND Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC HEARING DECEMBER 5, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. CASCADE VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 13601 - 32nd Avenue South CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /6-2y AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330 AND RCW 35A.14.340 ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP, ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING A ZONING MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA AND PROVIDTi$G THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS AND ZONING MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA WHEREAS, a petition for annexation was received by the City of Tukwila for the area known as Cascade View and more specifically described in Attachment A hereto, and WHEREAS, the petition was certified by the King County Prosecutors Office as to form and by the Tukwila City Clerk for adequate number of signatures, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official made a determination on July 24, 1989, that there will be no significant adverse environmental impact as a result of the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1112, the City of Tukwila approved the annexation and provided, as requested by the petitioners, that the question of annexation, together with the adoption of zoning and land use regulations, should be submitted to the electorate following the adoption of pre - annexation zoning and land use regulations pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Planning Commission held a public hearing on a Pre - Annexation Zoning Map and Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map for the area on August 10, 1989, and adopted recommendations to the City Council on August 24, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has held two public hearings on September 11, 1989, and October 16, 1989, has reviewed the Planning Staff's file and has considered the Planning Commission's recommendations, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Cascade View Annexation Area and is as described in Attachment A hereto. Section 2. Comprehensive Policy Plan Map Amended. The area described in Attachment A hereto is declared to be within the City of Tukwila's planning area and the City of Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan is hereby adopted for such area and the Plan Map is hereby amended to include the area described in Attachment A with comprehensive plan designations as shown on Attachment B hereto. Section 3. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Attachment A or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and to the Zoning Map shown-in Attachment C hereto, said Zoning Map and Zoning Regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the Zoning Regulations for the City of Tukwila. 12ST Pagel Section 4. Filing. A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed in the offices of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Section 5. Effective Date. :This Ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached'Summary which is hereby approved. b PASSED of , 1989. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this _ APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFIC •' THE CITY ATTORNEY FI �+' WITH THE CITY CLERK:. //- c - r9 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: / / - 4 8 9 PUBLISHED: t/- ).Z- g? /.Z- EFFECTIVE DATE: 11 - / ti - Jr'? ORDINANCE NO " /x.3 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330 AND RCW 35A.14.340 ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP, ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS AND ADOPTING A ZONING MAP TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION AREA AND PROVIDNG THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS AND ZONING MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA On � to , 1989; the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance No. 45:37 providing for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map`: and Pre- Annexation Zoning and Land Use Regulation for Cascade View to become effective in the event of annexation and providing for an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at its meeting of 1989. ATTACHMENT A CASCADE VIEW 19- OCTOBER -88 Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22, T23N, R4E. W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 1/4 cornerog said Section; thence .,North 18w28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street. said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the east margin of 2 Avenue South; thence northerly along said east margin to the south margin of South 116th Way; thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence . easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds. Volume 3860, page 462. Records of King County. WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 1 1.‘1 V LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL „1 4\11 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Li ..,;." 0 'Lt I .4.1 • - ■;■1■1 7 , • -7* 6 n5 i 0. , C., I ' ; ' • . N I .....4 111 ill • . r .•,' ■ 1! ‘ • :,:. ; .. • OFFICE / f 5 n IP .. ..1•••f 54 :1i 4.. , • • . - . % ' \ a • 1 a 11 ' ' i• - r'il 1M •• • - 1 D 'Hul "." 41 1 V" t.k.r R• '*■/:* ( 't ' '"' 1.• • i ,; & . • I. 2 ' . 4' tv .. •1 Ri n', • .f "!•ei . • i••• .13 : • ••• • • 2.0 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • • '4'. N*1 • f.. .• • • 1. a '• • ; ...11011 •••• ••• 'earl!). * U . u l id I i n , 11 . 1 4: 0 • • t. • 1 • •• 14■01 ' r.1 a pi. ( ;:iNg . ;• • 1 •11!.1 614 v .1 .• s DUWAMISH ROTA • 1.... • ••• • - I ‘, \':.‘• LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL.. n. . • ... ii • 1 • . • • v, i •,, ..1.• . " 'I ' . 0 ' : • ' •i . ,' • ..• :•1 I: . i f '• •• • ,:' ' , • .1 • I.. ' u II' ' Y i'll 1 i , • i i• .n COMMERCIAL .. "'llit. . .... :... .•, , . • ,. 4 . ., ..... 4 ...,,r " •,,,-4 ik...-el:i,*);Piji, .. i-:;,..:. :.‘,.,'....,, -. 4 ,;.:.•'- : , P • I ••• .. ..1 : • „ 41 II .^• ,,,. ' • i ll ,''. .. • ' ' • iit; Hluti DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 1 n. 11. ,•: • • ... 11 . '1 • • g.. tr. ilv, .:1/2A '''',N:. :.•33-..Ni: • i! • : ..... ' • ? .,•-'" 14.*: - ..; , : . 12 t '.1-ct,,•• ,,.f. ,;( , ' 1 :1 . 1 :',` - k-,,,;,.,.,:, •"...I! J.,.:. ,.„...,', 1 `Ii "i)'.':' ';' v•-is , 3t. " . ':-;•:,.a.',.;„ .1. f.:!.'"•11, C• , f , LOVI DENSITY 1;11v-, . .'.'• :it ... /0.' , N„ iv: :.F. ., , 7: 1 11 . 4Cl ir ' ''.• ... ,t p " . 11 •• - ... • • 1 „ RESIDENTIAL '',. a 4. . ,., i , , rir ,..,,4• 14z ...,,,. ;.; t 4.:.:: ,. ;.. .,,,! .. .i ii, .. :. ., t, ,.: :., 1 , (.1 V i •" • • 1 T q , D W t Q ; „. „.• • li i .j ....a.• r ,.. . .. . • . _ . • 8 • i 1. • _•.,,,.,1-11. .. rillis?91sy. 1 .1'.,, , ,...;Liti .7.00214 . C .. "* . , - - ,• • • - t • /.; i .t.i.;*.; cup ;,, .10 . i .. !I . ri `;:1.1.1.•, • !. • ' i • IP ." i''z' fr 1 h ti' • if. I. .. .',• tl :11 • ." , ' `. ,.,l a ..‘■ • .1.41 . • • . . . & ' . 1 1 . iss ...I . 1 , ..'„,,., ..•;,. . 1 I,' .1c .. : • .. P.. : .;,?•ri: i ',. -" • • - (N,',c,4 .. .. • •i . , I. Al'. • fo,; ii % • . it 1 • :, rr . ,. ,..... 0 ....; ,: .... ,11 . ■: ' ,. • • :1, C I) ' h • . It .. , L. 1 II 1,., I. ,••• e .,.. , . ......D.,2r4 . . . •I . 1) V. if 1 i ‘ ‘ ! . , ,- 1 ... , ti , ‘ Li ..,.. .,. •-. ...!.• ? I .1• .. . , ... , a . ' , %c v : . , 01; • , . 0 MEDIUM DENSITY1 1 , ' \ 4 c ' • •`) N fl .1 • ..„t? Li ., 0 .,,. ."',.. '... J(.: • ,. v„ . .1::: RESIDENTIA - ... • ro • ob i , - • •' i WI; • ••,1 ' ‘......19'1V,. i I ' •••• I . 1 . , C\ • 8 ,. • • ,,.. 11 • - ii ' '' \'• 1.04E4 ---- • " %. . • 1" \ .4 • -,,':-. , ....7•:•,, , , .?-1 "te4-1.1. . 1:;........?..‘*.••■•• ,.• ., .. • '1.',1. - • 'MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL pOr. it LI I eer:c SI . • - ' .:414i4 : . 6 ‘.'•• • 9 ' 7 f i ' •! 1 U' 01 1 ° El ■ ' 3 1'. ..)1 ) 110 p. t fit-31j /. • I ' 1: • ''')..: • r) :1 : .. .1 • • • II.. I . u ci . 7 ' II , J . • " .. cl•c,"'",61 ' ev..... ,..!,:a -.. • : i - t ' ": ,, ,-., -" - . • 4 „th. 4,' ...it, . • ..'i:„ ..';‘.c., '1 4.) •• 1 " ' ' • • . n I PIO p.,):1101;1 i COMMERCIAL II .: bi' • ' ?..1 1 • • A ttr''' I .-.•-•,•:. ..c . •t; ' 7 , t C:'.- 7 ' t !. I .. • . k .." ,....,.. • .. A. Ale rp..•..4 ..r.!'" . • '.1,i. , s r , , ■ . • • : • 1 IM ' • W I . ., 1 - 6 7- •• i l . .;1 1. .!7 ‘ . „ - . LS tt it... ... : pc ... . . .. . ..... i •Ci ' .. ' c?no6IINI.,..'. .':,...? ...P.P. . P 1. .. 7 . . ,. 5'e _ 1 r , 0 . ig • ,... • • •■ • • ... I :•••• 1 I tl J I 1 2 4.1 5 4: . ...i n ' . i g .. N. ;j: , • I ; . ... 3,46. il El 1:4 - I i t. ...1.,' . 16'1 4 i fi r e• . 4 t ; . i • • 'til • 1 \ :.. y \ `'. .• NO, 7 • - 7. Pi ?if n • • io r•P • - 11 41 • * • •Thqi . . . • I T z 15 if V .• •"7 • COMMERCIAL . 4": I 111 ••'• •• 1'V ' , • Or-1 CASCADE VIEW COMPREHENSIVE ■ SIVE PLAN Laiq . • • . -!• '; ATTACHMENT • ' MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL /.• h.,\ • 4 - :i DENSITY RESIDENTIAL .1 .1kil 1-:tb 0 :+•.; i .. .3., , , ,! •,ryg;_ MEDIUM DENSITY .,,• .i.-.1 ......r.'3: RESIDENTIAL ...-'14;.7;,';'■ COMMERCIAL 1Wil HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAI mow et .atij Nil 11•t.T.2 tele PLAN WO APT 11.1.7.2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4/AC 11.2 DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 11 /AC 11.2 3 AND 4 TOWNHOUSES 1S /AC R•4 LOW DENSITY APARTMENTS 22 /AC MAN NION DENSITY APARTMENTS 30 /AC P•0 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE C•1 COMMUNITY RETAIL C.2 REGIONAL RETAIL C•M ROUSTRIAL P*RK RNE t HOSPITAL TO: Boundary Review Board FROM: Philip P. Gustafson, Managing Director DATE: November 17, 1988 SUBJECT: ANNEXATION 12844 Mii:taiv rsoao Souti: Seattie. WA 98168 (2061 244-0180 Riverton Hospital is a full service, general, acute care hospital located at 12844 Military Road South, serving this region for over 35 years. We employ approximately 380 people and have a payroll of $7.5 million per year, and pay real estate, B S 0, and various other taxes at a rate of $500,000 per year. Future programming, physician recruitment to keep up with the demands of the area, and general development of the hospital is dependent on some better organization of city government in the area generally surrounding the hospital. It is graphically apparent to the hospital community that there is not enough police protection, and that the area is lacking an infrastructure to serve a twenty -four hour city with an International Airport and airport related industry. It is vitally important to provide an adequate tax base, local representation and control, and that development occur in a cohesive manner. The proposal to establish a city of "Sea -Tac" meets all of those criteria as reflected in the report provided by the Georgette group, and would meet the needs of the development of medical programs and hospital services to this community. We also have very close relationships with the Tukwila community and surround- ing industries and wish to continue to support and be a part of this community. It is essential that any solution be one which meets the needs of both communities and promotes cooperation and teamwork for the future. Establishment of a local entity to showcase the area around the airport for future development and for the life and safety of citizens and businesses within the area is paramount and we hope your decision is based on those criteria. Whether we are annexed to the Tukwila or to the Sea -Tac community, we feel that it is imperative that the Boundary Review Board provide sufficient popu- lation area and tax support to allow the vital development of the area surround- ing the airport. r. (N. •,s Lit3:l t:. ;. : 1K ,? a q. It g In participation with physicians. serving the health care needs of our community. HIGHLINE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 16251 Sylvester Road S.W. / Seattle, WA 98166 / (206) 244.9970 October 26, 1989 Mr. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner Tukwila Department of Community Development 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Umetsu: We would like to request that the parcel of land (approximately 22 acres) directly East of the Highline Community Hospital - Riverton Campus be designated as R -2 status for the purposes of the annexation process now under consideration. Based on preliminary results of a Feasibility Study now underway regarding this parcel, it is evident that the P.O. zoning being considered would not allow for the most appropriate use of this site, as indicated by the results of the Feasibility Study. We apologize for the lateness of this request, however we did not get the preliminary results of the Feasibility Study until recently. We appreciate your consideration in this matter. If you have any ques- tions, please do not hesitate to call me at 431 -5233. Sincerely, KL LAk ixon McDonald Director of Administrative Projects DM /sc r. cir uma....... .. mi ttrso- +x:rswrzemor:nNYiMr.11YG.:n ?: OWNED AND OPERATED BY AND FOR THE CITIZENS OF. SOUTHWEST KING COUNTY ; wvN:" r2s'.> tiei!;' i'' i�Fib!': �?: J•. iC�' di: 1r: '%'ta:r.+lw�ux.rxnrr.w�..,..,.. ti_ . -___�...... October 13, 1989 Council Members City of Tukwila 6200 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98118 Ladies and Gentlemen: Sincerely, DM /er HIGHLINE COMM HOSPITAL TEL No.2062439934 Oct . 13 , 89 15:44 P.02 NIOHLINE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 16251 Sylvester Rood S.W. / Seattle, WA 98166 / (206) 2449970 Highline Community Hospital, as it relates to its Riverton Campus, wants it to be made known that we support the Planning Commission's proposed land use zoning. Our understanding of the proposal is the result of the commendable work of your Annexation Task Force, the City Planning Commission and Mr.Umetsu and Mr. Pace of your Department of Community Development. As you know the Hospital's desire to be a valued addition to the City has prompted us to employ experienced professionals to assist in determining the most efficient, and community oriented, use of its' assets. These advisors endorse the P.O. zoning as it has been explained to them. tiki• McDonald 0 Nti D x Director, Administrative Projects OWNED AND OPERATED BY AND FOR THE CITIZENS OF SOUTHWEST KING COUNTY Marilyn Stoknes, President Tukwila City Council Dear Ms. Stoknes: Subject: Task Force Zoning Recommendations For Cascade View Annexation This is to confirm and clarify my statornen u:; ;It the public hearing Sept. .11th. I agree with the task force recommendation regarding my property at 14410 Military 3oad So. My property is zoned R -1 and I understand, it will remain 00. The Corprehensivr: Plan recommends future zoning as commercial. My property definitely has commercial potential, with frontage on both Military Road and on 34th Ave. South. Further, within the distance of a block there is a 7 -11 store, a Cleaners, a service station; I am adjacent to a medical- dental clinic. While I agree my property at present is satisfactorily R -1, I wish to keep the option open for change, should the opportunity arise. Thank Setp. 21, 1989 LeRoy AQ.l.sopp 14410 Military Road South Seattle, 98168 September 11, 1989 Ms. Alda Wilkinson Boundary Review Board 3600 136th Street Suite 22 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Dear Ms. Wilkinson: HIGHLINE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 16251 Sylvester Road S.W. / Seattle, WA 98166 / (206) 244 -9970 cer ig l� 061 Dixon McDonald Director of Administrative Projects DM :jp cc: vVernon Umetsu Mark Benedum Carol Hallen \,SEP 131989 As you may be aware, Highline Community Hospital recently acquired the Riverton Hospital properties at 128th and Military Road. The previous administration of Riverton Hospital, with our concurrence, asked that this property be omitted from the "Tukwila Annexation Plan ". Our think- ing, at that time, was that we needed and, in fact would be due, time to evaluate the developmental attitudes of the County and the various " municipalities" involved. Subsequently, we have commissioned an extensive study to establish the wisest and best use of the ancillary properties of our newly acquired asset. Highline Community Hospital's . mission is to provide quality health care to residents of this'suburban community. We address our recent growth in the Riverton area with this same commitment. It follows then that our responses and direction will be predicated on the needs and desires of the local community. Obviously the hospital is charged with making the most efficient use of its resources with the end that quality, affordable health care is available to the community. Therefore we view our position, at this time, as that of a staunch supporter of the community's wishes. OWNED AND OPERATED BY AND FOR THE CITIZENS OF SOUTHWEST KING COUNTY 4 October 19, 1989 . r.. nr�rricome+. vamaaseu. cr�n. �r.. ays7unseraxti2o# ra�3L�6aateW '1f�lCNaYS'.e.YttLtnrrge'.td$114 '6JI1J, WACCN t64Cdd'd .. Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 • TO: VERNON UMETSU, PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: ALDA H. WILKINSON, Executive Secretary IN RE: NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO. 1622 CITY OF TUKWILA Annexation (Cascade View) • OCT 231989 As you know, the above - referenced proposal was filed by the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County effective September 7, 1989. A copy of a request for review received in the office of the Board has already been transmitted to you. At the meeting of the Board held October 12, 1989, this matter was discussed and the date and location for the public hearing was established as specified in the Notice of Hearing enclosed herein. AHW /par Enclosure: Notice of Hearing REF: 7.89.HE2 O AHW /par REF: 7.89.HE3 WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 &d,b46-exi4, Alda H. Wilkinson, Executive Secretary NOTICE OF HEARING File No. 1622 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, December 5, 1989 at the hour of 7:30 P.M. at CASCADEVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MULTIPURPOSEROOM, 13601 32nd Ave. So.,SEATTLE, WA. for the purpose of considering the proposed annexation to the City of Tukwila, known as "Cascade View ", all in King County, Washington, and more particularly described as: That area generally bounded by 116th Way So. on the north; Pacific Highway and Tukwila City limits on the east; and Sea Tac City limits, Military Road, and 24th Ave. So. to its intersection with 116th Way on the west. A FULL AND COMPLETE LEGAL IS ON FILE AND MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. At said time and place, any and all interested persons may appear and be heard with reference to said proposal. DATED at Bellevue, Washington, this 19th day of October, 1989. October 16, 1989 7:00 P.M. 9:15 P.M. Specific Site Recommendations and Analyses for the Cascade View Pre - annexation Zoning TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MINUTES The Tukwila City Council Committee of the Whole meeting was called to order with all Council Members present. Councilmember Robertson explained that 60% of the Cascade View area is currently zoned multi- family. This is pretty much in line with Tukwila. From a zoning standpoint, there is very little reason to want to zone much more high- density multi - family. Another point is that generally, in the last six months, Council has allowed no R.M.H. and very little R -4. Generally, Council has gone to R -3. We don't want the great big complexes, we want, at most, three or four units in one building. Council reviewed the sixteen specific site recommendations and the analyses the Task Force compiled as modified by the Planning Commission. The final Council action was as follows: ,.7._t,e Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers Area 1: (Northwest corner of South 144th and 37th Avenue South.) One acre tract, Down -Zone to R -3 with Comp Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Area 2: NO CHANGE - (South side of South 142nd Place, West of 37th Avenue South.) 1.3 acre tract, maintain R -1 -7.2 zoning with Comp Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Area 3: (Between South 141st and South 142nd, east of 37th Avenue South.) 3.1 acre tract, Zone as R -3 and change Comp Plan designation from Public Facility to Medium Density Residential. Area 4: NO CHANGE - (Between South 140th and South 141st, east of 37th Avenue South.) 2.4 acre tract, Down -Zone to R -2 and R -3 with Comp Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Area 5: NO CHANGE - (South 140th to South 142nd Place, bet- ween 33rd Avenue South and 37th Avenue South.) 14.5 acre tract, maintain R -1 -7.2 zoning with Comp Plan designation of Low Density Residential. Area 6: NO CHANGE - (South of South 132, west of 35th Avenue South.) 0.9 acre tract, Down -Zone from R -2 to R -1 -7.2 zoning with Comp Plan designation of Low Density Residential. Area 7: NO CHANGE - (fronting on Pacific Hwy, north of South 132nd.) 0.6 acre tract, Down -Zone area to R -1 -7.2 with Comp Plan designation of Low Density Residential. Area 8: (South of South 130th, between 33rd Avenue South and 34th Avenue South.) 0.22 acre tract, Down -Zone area from R -2 to R -1 -7.2 with Comp Plan designation of Low Density Residential. Area 9: NO CHANGE - (East and adjacent to Riverton Hospital site.) 24.7 acre tracts, Up -Zone area to P -0 with Comp Plan designation of office. Area 10: (West portion of three lots west of Pacific Hwy, north of Progressive Care, Inc., about South 128th.) 6.9 acre tracts, maintain existing R -1 -7.2 zoning, change Comp Plan from High Density Residential to Low Density Residential. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL, COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE October 16, 1989 Page 2 Specific Site Recommendations and Analyses for the Cascade View Pre - annexation Zoning (cont.) ADJOURNMENT 10:45 P.M. Area 11: NO CHANGE - (Two large lots north of Progresssive Care, Inc. about South 128th.) 6.8 acre tracts, maintain R -1 -7.2 with Comp Plan designation changed from High Density Residential to Low Density Residential. ** Area 17: NEW AREA ADDED - (Nursing Home Site at South 128th.) 10 acre tract, designate zoning as R -3 with Comp Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Area 12: NO CHANGE - (North of and adjacent to South 128th, east of Military Road.) 2.4 acre tract, Rezone to P -0 with Comp Plan designation of office. Area 13: (East of and adjacent to Woodridge Apartments.) 7 acre tract, change zoning to R -2 with Comp Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Area 14: NO CHANGE - (East of Military road between South 120th and the property line mid -way between South 127th and South 128.) 27.5 acre tract, Rezone to R -1 -7.2 with Comp Plan designation of Low Density Residential. Area 15: NO CHANGE - (Foot of steep slope, west of and adjacent to Pacific Hwy. South and east of Woodridge Apartments.) 12 acre tract, Zone to C -M with 115' height exception area upon BAR approval, Comp Plan designation of Light Industrial. Area 16: NO CHANGE - (Woodridge and the Tamaquah Apartments, adjacent to Pacific Hwy. at approximately South 120th.) 12 acre tract, Zone to R -4 with Comp Plan designation of High Density residential. Area 18: NEW AREA ADDED - (South of South 146th at 35th Avenue South.) Zone C -2 with Comp Plan designation of commercial. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT AN ORDINANCE BE DRAWN DESIGNATING THE PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING FOR THE CASCADE VIEW AREA AND THAT IT BE ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY HERNANDEZ, THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED. Marilyn Stoknes, Council President e.c.‘_. axine Anderson, City Clerk • , • •itlAilvWfa itgiriZif4 4To*Ai CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOL'THCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 October 10, 1989 MB. Alda H. Wilkinson, Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 RE: BRB File No. 1622, City of Tukwila Annexation of Cascade View Area. Dear Ms. Wilkinson, Thank you for your help in clarifying the Board's review process and schedule for action in light of the King County request to invoke jurisdiction. The City of Tukwila requests that a public hearing be held at the earliest possible date in December. Please do not hesitate to contact Vernon Umetsu or myself if we can be of any assistance. Sinc Rick Beeler, 'irector Department of Community Development PHONE #1206)433.1800 Gal).L.VdOnsm_lkytor - • , ;h. «'i Y1a� i• 5} .� # Y.." �j r•' . {j��'li t; it IN RE: REF: 9.89.HE1 September 28, 1989 TO: The Honorable City Council, City of Tukwila AHW /par Enclosure: Request for Review , 1+7.1v1% V....., I OCT ~ 61989 I cup,. FROM: ALDA H. WILKINSON, Executive Secretary REQUEST FOR REVIEW FILE NO. 1622 - CITY OF TUKWILA - Annexation (Cascade View) Attached is a copy of the request to hold a public hearing on the above - referenced file recently received by the Board. The Board will discuss this matter at its meeting scheduled for October 12, 1989. At that time, a public hearing may be set. If you have any comments to make regarding the proposed hearing date(s), please transmit them to this office prior to the meeting. You will be advised of the date and time of the scheduled public hearing as you have been in the past. CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski Department of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight Department of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock Department of Records and Elections, ATTN: Superintendent of Elections Bob Bruce Parks, Planning & Resource Department, ATTN: James C. Tracy, Director Building and Land Development Division, ATTN: Iry Berteig, Manager Planning and Community Development, ATTN: Lois Schwennesen, Manager �. .... „ ..... .A. :e, UM. y�r a� vv•�.: rrr. ulmccoum Planning tend Community Development Dlvldon Parka, Planing and newurcea Department 907 Smith lbwer Building 608 Second Amuse Seattle, VVaahinston 68104 U0S)16 4110 October 5, 1989 I tL NU.: 2062566666 TO: Alda Wilkinson, Executive Secretary, Boundary Review oar FM: Lois Schwennesen, Manager, Planning and Community elop t pj vision 4 U") /t,.e RE: File No 1622: City of Tukwila Proposed Ann�xatibn (Cascade View) ~ --------- The proposed annexation is in the Nighline Community Planning Area and outside of Tukwila's planning area as depicted in the 1982 Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. This Division supports Motion 7700 passed by the King County Council on September 25, 1989 requesting that the Boundary Review Board convene e public hearing and review this proposed annexation. If you have further questions, please contact me at 296-8658, or Nancy Ousley at 296 -8611. LS:sm HS7:006 8491 P02 - -- ----- -- cc: James C. Tracy, Acting Director, Parks, Planning and Resources Department ATTN: Craig Larsen, Chief, Community Planning Section Nancy Ousley, Project Manager, Intergovernmental Planning ATTN: Derek Poon, Chief, Resource Planning Section f �U O Q CT 4 1989 WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING CO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 �.......-...... ,.�..w.v..+..eyu.roarsr...:x.w: rope ........w++w.:.arw+.Raa: *.. S..1..01...w. -+ ATTEST: Clerk of the ouncil SP September 15, 1989 INTRODUCED BY: NICKELS 1057H:hdm • PROPOSED NO.: 89 - 5 MOTION N0. 7 ` m O A MOTION requesting the Boundary Review Board to review the City of.Tukwila's proposed annexation of "Cascade View" pursuant to RCW 36.93.100. WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board (BRB) was created to provide a neutral forum for the public hearing and the review and determination of proposed annexations and incorporations to avoid competition to extend municipal boundaries, to prevent the haphazard boundary extensions, and to create and preserve logical service areas as set forth as purposes and objectives of the BRB in RCW 36.93.010 and RCW 36.93.180, and WHEREAS, coordination between jurisdictions and examination of service issues should be encouraged, and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila on September 6, 1989 filed a notice of intention to annex an area known as "Cascade View ", and WHEREAS, RCW 36.93.100 provides for the BRB to review proposed annexations, and King County Ordinance No. 8389 provides for a means of requesting such review, and WHEREAS, the public is best served by open public hearing and review of these issues; - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: The Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County is requested to review the following specific action:- The City of Tukwila's proposed annexation of "Cascade View" BRB File No. 1622. PASSED this ,2S day of -1 c. la-.r , 19 8"S . KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING CQ 1 WASHINGTON D SEP2 ?1989 WASHINGTON STATE COUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING CO O September 26, 1989 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 180061 " tlei31ig i0 bBj a96 -7096 SEP 271989 TO: VERNON UMETSU, PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: ALDA H WILKINSON, Executive Secretary IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING FILE NO. 1622 CITY OF TUKWILA Annexation Cascade View The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office is now acceptable for filing and been official filed effective September 7, 1989 and assigned FILE NO.1622. You will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action. As you are aware, a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County Council by this office. This was under date of September 7, 1989. Any revisions to the legal description subsequent to that date must be incorporated in your final ordinance /resolution filed with the King County Council. AHW /par CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski Department of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight Department of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock Mr. James C. Tracy, Director, Parks, Planning & Resources Division ATTN: Mr. Iry Berteig, Manager, BALD REF: 7.89.11 .......» ...M.,...d....n.w,.r . owus. n.a1..mwa,.+.vc hr.b w210a...a ...‘ na.k......,,., ......, « CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKIV1LA, WASHINGTON 98188 PHONE # (206) 433.1800 CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Cascade View Pre - Annexation Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila City Council will conduct two public hearings on pre- annexation zoning and comprehensive plan designations for the Cascade View annexation area. Such designations will become effective upon annexation to the City of Tukwila. The annexation area and Planning Commission recommended zoning is shown on the attached map. The public hearings will be held on September 11, 1989 and October 16, 1989, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. The application file numbers are as follows: 89 -2 -CPA: Comprehensive Plan Amendment 89 -3 -R: Rezone Persons wishing to comment may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on these items may be obtained at the Tukwila Department of Community Development. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Please contact Vernon Umetsu at 433 -1858 if you have any questions. Distribution: Cascade View Annexation Area property owners Registered voters; interested citizens . on attendance sheet; Mayor; file. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Date: September 8, 1989 MEMORANDUM From: The Tukwila Planning Commission To: The Tukwila City Council RE: Cascade View Annexation Area Pre - annexation Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Planning Commission Recommendations Transmitted herewith is the Planning Commission's recommended zoning and comprehensive Plan designations for the Cascade View annexation area. Recommended area zoning is shown in Exhibit 1 with comprehensive plan designations to be presented at the public hearing on September llth. The area zoning map reflects Pre - Annexation Zoning Task Force recommendations except in four areas. These areas are shown in the attached map with changes summarized below and detailed analyses contained in Exhibit E: Area 6 Up -zone to R -2 (Duplex at 11 units /acre) from County RS7200 (Single Family) instead of the Task Force recommended R- 1 -7.2. The R -2 area would act as a buffer area between the RMH zone to east and the R -1 -7.2 sone on west. Area 8 Maintain R -2 zone as equivalent to County RD3600 instead of the Task Force -recommended down -zone to R- 1 -7.2. R -2 zoning is more appropriat* due to the area's proximity to Hwy. 99 and difficult site grades Which make single family development improbable. Area 10 Establish Comprehensive Plan as High Density Residential instead of the Task Force recommended Low Density Residential.' This is necessary to allow some possibility of site development such as is allowed to the immediate south and west. Very difficult geotechnical and access constraints make single family development extremely unlikely. Up- zoning should only be allowed if adequate access and design quality are assured. Area 15 Up -zone to C -M (Industrial Park) from the County's CG (General Commercial), instead of the Task Force recommended M -1. Both recommend establishing a 115 ft. height exception area upon B.A.R. approval. This prominent gateway location requires a minimum level of design quality which is higher than might occur in an M -1 (Light Industrial) zone. The Planning Division also recommends modifying the Comprehensive Plan designation for Area 3 from "Public Facility" to "Medium Density Residential." This would better reflect anticipated uses and increase Comprehensive Plan usefulness in reviewing rezones, conditional uses, variances, and other land use actions. Detailed analyses, summary public comments, and Planning Commission minutes are presented in the attached exhibits. COMP PLAN HIGH DENSITY . RESIDENTIAL • R2 COMP PLAN COMMERCIAL gr I1•1 r• • • p c•E RMH Exyiatr 1 PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION R-1 -7.2 Single Family Residential 6 /acre R -2 Duplex Residential 11 /acre R -3 3 and 4 Townhouses 15 /acre R -4 Low Density Apartments 22/acre RMH High Density Apartments 30 /acre P -O Office /R -2 C -1 Community Retail C -2 Regional Retail C -M Industrial Park AREA 10 CITY COUNCIL WILL MAKE FINAL DECISION ON OCTOBER 16TH 1989 AREA 8 A LARGER DETAILED MAP IS AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL FOR REVIEW. CONTACT VERNON UMETSU 433-185B AREA 6 IM w ST _114111111T • C.2 A.3 II 1401157 AREA 3 Absent: Lee Cagle City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 24, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Flesher, Kirsop, and Knudson. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, and Joanne Johnson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AUG 10, 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. 89- 1 -SPE; 89 -7 -DR; 89 -1 -CUP -- SOUTHCENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT #406 (FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL) Request for approval of a cooperative parking agreement, design review and conditional use permit for Foster High School. Jack Pace, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposal using a model of the . site as well as detailed site plans of the project. He reviewed the staff report recommending approval of the coopera- tive parking agreement with two conditions; approval of the design review with five conditions; and approval of the condi- tional use permit with no conditions. Brad Collins, 365 Ericksen, Bainbridge Island, WA 98118, represented the applicant. He concurred with the staff report in general. He reviewed each of the requests in detail. Dr. Michael Silver, Southcentral School District Superintendent stressed the importance of the new facility to the community. He expressed appreciation to the city staff and consultant. Bill Riggs, 11319 - 26th Avenue S. , Facilities Director for Southcentral School District reviewed the history of the project. Frank Smith, BSJJ Group, 320 West Bay Drive, Suite 98502, Olym- pia, WA, architect for the project, reviewed the design aspects of the project. NOTE CAC,qbC VIEW START'S' 0 nr 4. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 2 Akira Sato, BSJJ Group, designer of the project, expressed his enthusiasm for the project design concepts. Mr. Collins felt that although the site is small, the design will work well. He credited Chris Johnson as the other designer for the project. Jeannelle Baldwin, 5827 S. 144th Street, School. Board President, assured the Commission that it is the philosophy of the school district to immediately remove graffiti, which discourages further incidents of graffiti. The Public Hearing was closed at 8:55 p.m. Discussion ensued on the three proposals. MR. FLESHER MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO• APPROVED THE REQUEST'FOR A COOPERATIVE PARKING AGREEMENT (89- 1 -SPE) BASED ON.THE FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE STAFF REPORT AND INCLUDING PROVISIONS ONE AND TWO AS READ IN THE STAFF REPORT. Provisions 1 and 2 read as follows: 1. When activities /events are scheduled in such a manner as to require the simultaneous use of any combination of the high school complex facilities and thereby potentially generate parking demand which will exceed the on -site 282 parking stalls, the School District shall provide necessary staffing and signs to direct traffic to nearby designated overflow parking locations. Failure on the part of the School District to do so may cause rescission of this agreement. 2 . If there is a demonstrated consistent daytime high school use) parking demand which exceeds the on -site 282 parking stall capacity for the high school use, the matter shall be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission may at that time require the School District to construct :. the additional . on -site parking (as shown on the site plan as future parking) in a reasonable period of time. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE. THE REQUEST FOR APPROVAL FOR DESIGN REVIEW (89 -7 -DR) BASED ON THE . FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS AND INCLUDING ALL OF. THE. RECOMMENDATIONS OF STAFF.. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Conditions read as follows: 1 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a revised site plan showing: a. Planning Commission August.24, 19.89 Page. 3 An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement, , contrasting material) at the north end of the bus load area (along 42nd Avenue S.E.) between the public sidewalk and the bus load area. • An enhanced pedestrian crossing with a differentiated surface (raised pavement contrasting material) at either end of the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. . Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department a site lighting plan showing: • Reduced wattage of the fixtures used in the parking lot lighting (Type "C" fixtures) to 250 watts unless there is satisfactory evidence provided that the 400 watt fixtures are necessary for public safety. • Restriction of the lighting distribution to within the property boundaries of the site. ▪ Statement on the drawing which indicates the use of the tennis court lighting shall be restricted to no later than ten p.m. d. Information on the specific exterior lighting fixtures. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval of the Community Development Department revised landscaping plans showings a. Additional landscaping (trees, groundcover) along the pedestrian walkway (between the auditorium and the existing indoor swimming pool facility) in the eastern parking lot. The addition of .three trees to be located within the lawn area along 144th South (next.to` bus load area). Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 4 The addition of a minimum of 3 trees to be located within the lawn area located along 42nd Avenue S.E. A. minimum of 24 inch shrubs along the east periinete north parking lot (next to athletic fields). e. Substitution of 36 inch for 24 inch. shrubs ;(laurel shown) in locations where used between site perimeter and adjoining parking. stalls. Landscaping specifications for the . planting of the London Plane trees will be reviewed in detail and must include a 3 -foot minimum: planting distance of 3 feet back of' curb . with a..trench for. each .tree to be a minimum of 4 feet deep, 5 feet wide, and 10 feet long. Special soil mix may be required at the time of build- ing permit issuance. The height of the (2) earth berms located at the southwest corner of the site and within the vision triangle area (south and west of the visitor: parking area) shall not exceed (3) feet in height above street grade. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Community Development Department plans showing the location and screening details for exterior trash receptacles. MR. FLESHER MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT ( 89 -2- CUP BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE IS ALREADY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THAT SITE AND THE ONLY NEW AREA IS THE AUDITORIUM. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. A recess was called and the meeting reconvened at 9:12 pm Chairman Haggerton reviewed the procedure for this meeting, indicating that public testimony would not be taken; and a decision would be made on the request for zoning designations and comprehensive plan designations for the Cascade View Annexation area, based on the public testimony taken at the at the August 10, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 89 -3 -R i 89 -2 -CPA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION - Request to establish Comprehensive. Plan Map and Pre - annexation. Zoning Map designations for the Cascade. View Annexation area. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, reviewed the testimony which was presented on August 10, 1989 meeting. He reviewed area #15 of the map pointing out the present uses and proposed zoning and testimony given for this area. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page 5 Discussion ensued next. on Item #1. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION" TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE, RECOMMENDATION OF RMH FOR THIS AREA.: MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Item #2. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION FOR A ZONING DESIGNATION OF•SINGLE•FAMILY"AND:COMP PLAN DESIGNATION'OF MEDIUM DENSITY.. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED..:: Discussion ensued next on Item A, Area 3. NR. KIRSOP .MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND R -3 ZONING DESIGNATION FOR ITEM A, AREA 3. THE MOTION CARRIED WITH KIRSOP, FLESHER, HAGGERTON,.HAMILTON VOTING YES AND MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO. Discussion ensued next on Item #4. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR AREA 4 AS R -3 ON THE EASTERLY TWO THIRDS AND R-2 FOR THE WEST WHICH CONSISTS OF AN EXISTING APART - MENT STRUCTURE. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Item #5. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF R -1, 7.2 ZONING DESIGNATION. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Items B, C, D; Areas 6 & 8. MR KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND AREA 6 HAVE A ZONING DESIGNATION OF R -2 BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A BUFFER FROM RMH AND STILL BE COMPATIBLE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 7. MR. HAMILTON MOVED AND MR. FLESHER SECONDED A. MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR R -1 ZONING. THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. - Discussion ensued next.on Area 8. MR.•KIRSOP.MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO.RECOMMEND :R -2 ZONING DESIGNATION FOR AREA 8 PRIMARILY .FOR•THE OF THE SITE .AND THE PROXIMITY TO THE HIGHWAY. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY • APPROVED. Planning Commission August 24, 1989 Page •6 Discussion ensued next on Area 9, Item E: MR. , KNUDSON AND'MR. KIRSOP SECONDED A MOTION TO'RECOMEND PO ZONING FOR BASED ON THE FORCE RECOMMENDATION AND THE APPROPRIATENESS FOR SENIOR HOUSING. 'MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Areas 10 & 11. MR. KIRSOP.MOVED AND MR. SECONDED A MOTION. THAT AREAS 10 AND.11 HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:DESIGNATION OF HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL' WITH A ZONING DESIGNATION OF R -1, 7.2. MOTION 'UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next. on Area 12. MR. FLESHER MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR AREA 12 FOR P.O. ZONING DESIGNATION. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 13. MR. KNUDSON MOVED 'AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF R -4 ZONING. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO EXTEND.THE DEADLINE FOR MEETING LENGTH BEYOND THE. 10:30 PM DEADLINE. •MR. FLESHER SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Discussion ensued next on Area 14. MR. KIRSOP MOVED:AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND R- ZONING AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TASK FORCE. MOTION CARRIED. WITH . KIRSOP, FLESHER,•HAGGERTON.AND HAMILTON VOTING YES AND•MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO. Discussion ensued on Area 15. MR.. FLESHER MOVED THAT AREA 15, ITEM H, BE REZONED TO REFLECT A CM (INDUSTRIAL•PARK) ZONING DESIGNATION. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED WITH KIRSOP, FLESHER, HAGGERTON AND HAMILTON. VOTING YES AND MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO. •Discussion ensued'next on Area 16. MR. KIRSOP MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A. MOTION TO SUPPORT •THE,TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION OF'R -4. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY AP- PROVED. • MR. HAMILTON''MOVED TO ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS, FINDINGS. AND: CONCLUSIONS AS SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION THE EXCEPTIONS OF THOSE MODIFICATIONS MADE AT TONIGHT'S MEETING. .MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED DIRECTORS REPORT Jack Pace, Senior Planner stated that September 25, 1989 has been set, aside for a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission. on Wetlands. Also, September 28, 1989 is the BAR meeting. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joanne Johnson, Secretary 4 xtfi6( T .3 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF.TUKWILA 'PLANNING COMMISSION • AUG 10, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Cagle, Flesher, Kirsop, and. Knudson. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, and Joanne Johnson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. CAGLE SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE JULY 27, 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Chairman Haggerton reviewed the procedure for this public hear- ing, indicating that public testimony would be taken at this meeting; and a decision would be made at the August 27, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 89 -3 -R 6 89 -2 -CPA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION - Request to establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre- annexation Zoning Map designations for the Cascade View Annexation area. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report which was entered into the record as Exhibit A. He pointed out the intent of the Task Force on existing uses and expected uses on a large display map emphasizing the single family characteristics of the area which is also in compliance with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. The Public Hearing was opened. David Livermore, 13212 - 31st Avenue S., spoke representing the Task Force. He stated that the intent of the Task Force was to preserve as much Single Family character as practical without undue hardship. Planning Commission August 10, 1989 Page 2 Adele Scott, 13020 - 34th Avenue S. pointed out the location of her property on the display map. felt areas designated on the display map as 6 and 8 should have a single family designa- tion. She presented a petition supporting a Single Family designation for Areas 6 and 8 which was entered into the record as Exhibit "B ". John Welch, 2700. S. 133rd, pointed out his property on the display map stating he did not want to be locked into a P.O. zone and preferred M -1 zoning designation to P.O., Single Family, or C -2 zoning designation. Leslie Brown, 12010 - 26th Avenue S. pointed out his property on the display.map, stating he preferred a R -4 zoning designation . for his property. Floyd Thistle, 3226'S. 130th, asked that the Task Force recommen dations for the annexation area be upheld. He also supported the formation of a Community Municipal Council. Montana Cooter, 12915 Pacific Highway S. pointed out that the lots adjacent to Riverton Hospital were very unstable and,she felt it may threaten her property below if they are developed. Robert Boren, 12471 Pacific Highway S. wanted his name added to the::mailing list and also wanted the C -2 zoning designation to remain the property'to the south of Area 10, Bernardo Salle, 5614 S. Ryon Street, preferred that Areas 6 and 8 reflect a zoning designation that permits a 4 -plex. He felt that this area is not conducive to single family. Bob Kaye, 3715 S. 141st, owns two lots. He has a 13 unit apart - ment complex on one lot and the other lot he would like changed from a:suggested R -3 designation to R -4 designation. Larry Swedeluis, 3131 S. 133rd, pointed out his property on the display map. He favored maintaining the single family quality as much as possible and was opposed to any apartments being built. Robert Boe, 13515 - 35th Avenue S. felt that the Task Force worked hard to be fair and wants the Task Force recommendations upheld. . Bernard Salle wanted the Planning Commission not to forget the local businessman. He felt the area is getting more and more .foreign businesses. Floyd Thistle was opposed to any more apartment zoning taking place and wants single family neighborhood quality preserved. Planning. Commission 'August 1989 ...Page 3. He supported the Task Force recommendations The Public Hearing was closed at:9:00p.m. The Chairman noted that a decision will be made at the August .24, 1989' Planning Commission hearing. DIRECTORS REPORT Jack Pace, Senior Planner stated that Monday, September 25, 1989 at 7:00 p.m. has been set aside to review the City's Wetland areas. Joanne Johnson, Secretary The meeting was adjourned at 9 :05 Respectfully submitted, P. _4 1908 City Of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433.1 Gary. 1. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM To: Tukwila Planning Commission From: VernonUmetau, Associate Planner, RE: 89 -2 -CPA and 89 -3 -R (Cascade View Pre annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning ) - .Staff record of public hearing testimony. The . following location map and comment sheets summarize the testimony presented at. the Planning Commission public hearing of August 10, 1989. Please do not hesitate to telephone meat 433 -1858 if I can be of further assistance. Cascade View Pre - annexation Zoning Comment Location Map COIINENTATOR Bob ;Kaye, Area Resident 3715 So. 141st Street CONSENT Lots 2 and 3 of Area 3 should be zoned R-4 (Low'Apts. - 22 units ..per acre). There is already a 13 unit, low apartment building on Lot : 2. ; ; ,Area uses are more in keeping with an R -4 zone than R -3 (3 and 4 -plex units 15 units' per acre). COUNTY ZONING R1418..00 (.High Density Multi - family - 24' units: per ac • TASI FORCE' RECOMMENDATION 'R -3 (Three and Four Family. Dwellings - 15 units. per acre):. Bernardo Salle, Task Force Member and Area Land /Business. -owner 13003 Pacific Hwy. South (Live Butcher). COMMENT Areas , 6 and .8 ,should be zoned for multi - family use. Area 8 is currently zoned for multi-fainily use in King County. Neither area is appropriate for single family uae. The general area is growing and housing will be needed. He would like to develop 4- plex units on these properties. Consideration should be given .. to the survival of the local business owner. Almost all new businesses have been based on foreign or capital. COUNTY ZONING Area 6 - RS7200 (Single Family) Area 8 - RD3600 (Low Density Multi - family- 12 units per acre) . TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Zone both areas R-1-7.2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR C Adele Scott, Task Force Member and Area Resident 13020 34th Avenue So. Supports:.Taek- Force'. recommended R- 1 - 7.'2 zoning.in Areas 6 and 8. • :Submitted:a petition 117 •signatures supporting R;1:zoning'of Areas 6 and 8... COUNTY ZONING Area 6 RS7200 (Single Family) Area 8 - RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family 12 units per acre). TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Zone both areas as R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) COUNTY ZONING COMMENTATOR D Floyd Thistle, Task Force 3226 So. 130th 'Street COMMENT Strongly urges the . adoption and longterm implementation of Task Force Zoning and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. Specifically spoke against testimony which urged up zoning Areas 6 and 8 (see B. Salle). Area 6 - RS7200 (Single. Family) Area 8 - RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family = 12 units per acre). TASK FORCE RECOIMENIDATION Zone both areas as R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) Montana M. Cooter, Area Resident 12915 Pacific Hwy. So. COUNT Very concerned about increased landslide and storm water runoff hazard from Area 9 development on down slope properties. Pointed out heavy clay and water content in Area 9 soils. COUNTY ZONING Area 9 zoning is: RS7200 (Single Family). With: Potential.RM900 (Max. Density famly - 48'units per acre) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Up zone to P -0 (Office) COMMRNTATOR F Robert Boren, Area Landowner 12471 Pacific Hwy. So. COMMENT Wanted .to:.know what was the proposed zoning for his property at 12471 Pacific Hwy. South. He is satisfied with the recommended C -2 (Regional Retail) equivalent to the County's CG (General Commercial) zone. Agreed with Commissioner comment that the up slope area zoned .RS7200 (Single Family) presents a difficult situation due to steep slopes and wet soils. Thought that City was trying to sneak through zoning without letting the public know, but is satisfied with staff explanation of public notice procedures, meetings, and being assured that he will be notified of future public hearings. A follow -up staff phone call confirmed that he is satisfied with recommended zoning and the public involvement process. COUNTY ZONING CG (General Commercial) for flat areas adjacent to Hwy.99 and RS7200 Family) with Potential RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family = 12 units per acre) for up slope areas. Comprehensive Plan is Low Density Multi- family for up elope areas. TASK FORCE RECOMM6NDATION C -2 (Regional Retail) for flat areas adjacent to Hwy. 99 an R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) for up slope areas. Comprehensive Plan is Low Density Residential for up slope areas. COMMUTATOR G Leslie R. Brown, Area Resident 12010 26th Avenue So. COMMENT Establish an R -4 :zone, at the northern limit of Area : 14. COUNTY ZONING RS7200 (Single Family) with Potential RD36 Density Multi - family - 12 units per acre) TASK ' FORCE RECCIQDCNDATION Maintain equivalent zoning of R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR H John Welch, Task Force Member and Area Land /Business Owner 2700 So. 133rd Street (Valley Trucking) COQ Supports Task :Force recommended `M - .1 zoning for.' Area 15. M -1 'reflects :a relationship with M -2 :(Heavy Industrial) and M - (Light Industrial) areas:.immediately east of Hwy. 99. Agrees that : the existing heavy equipment sales and rental. .business is not an economical use of this valuable property, and that it is not the most visually presentable this site.. :He would. like to relocate to less, valuable location (i.e. in Sumner) if, this property can be developed for some higher quality use. He`is working With a developer.toward an ,office development. But wants to maximize his. flexibility should these immediate negotiations fall through. The retail uses permitted in a C -2 zone would not be market feasible in this location. C -2 constraintson use may force him to remain in this location instead of developing a higher quality use and moving to lower. priced property., COUNTY ZONING CG (General Commercial) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Up -zone to M -1 (Light Industrial) AREA -WIDE COMMENTS COMMENTATOR I David Livermore, Task Force Spokesperson and Area Resident 13212 31st Avenue So. COMMENT Discussed Task. Force area -wide plan development activities and the priority goal of preserving single residential areas. He'will be available for Commission. clarifying questions on Task Force findings, .conclusions and' recommendations COMMENTATOR J Larry Swedeluis, Task Force Member and Area Resident 3131 So. 133rd Street COMFIT There are many viable single family areas. The key to maintaining this viability is retaining as much single family neighborhood area as possible. Apartment zoning brings short- term residents who do not stay long enough to form an attachment to the neighborhood and the various attendant problems. COMMENTATOR E Robert Boe, Task: Force Member and Area Resident 13514 35th Avenue So. COMMENT The Task Force did a good job in developing the recommended Zoning and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. He supports the Task Force recommendations. COUNT! ZONING See Attachment 8, King County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Map. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION See Attachment D, Task Force Recommended Zoning Map. City of • Tukwila gxfi flier 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433.1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CALL TO ORDER ATTENDANCE NEW BUSINESS PLANNING COMMISSION Thursday, August 10, 1989 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers in City Hall AGENDA 5:30 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION (in Conference Room #3) Planning Commission Public Hearing 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers CASE NUMBER: 89 -3-R: CASCADE VIEW REZONE REQUEST: Establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre- Annexation Zoning Map designations for the Cascade View Annexation area. IV . DIRECTOR'S REPORT (if time permits) V ADJOURNMENT HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission Prepared August 4, 1989 August 10, 1989 89-2-PA: Cascade View Comprehensive Plan Amendment 89 -3-R: Cascade View Rezone. Cascade iew. Annexation Petitioners Establish mprehensive Plan Map and Pre= Annexation Zoning Ma designations for the Cascade Jew 'Annexation rea. Generally bo ded by Pacific Hwy. 56., Military Rd. So. /24th Ave. ., So. 116th Street /and So. 152nd Street (see Attachment A). Approximately 581 acres. King County Compr h fisive Plan designations are shown in Attachment to be presented at the public hearing. King County ar /zoning, is shown in Attachment B to be presented at tl public hing. DNS iss d (EPIC- 20 -89). \ . ascade View Vicinity Map Area -wide Existing Land Use Map with King County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations* Task Force Recommended Cascade View Comprehensive Plan Map* Task Force Recommended Cascade View Zoning Map *Attachment to be presented at Planning Commission public hearing ' of August 10, 1989. HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DISTRICT: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: *Attachment STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission Prepared August 4, 1989 August 10, 1989 89- 2-CPA: Cascade View Comprehensive Plan Amendment 89 -3-R: Cascade View Rezone. Cascade View Annexation Petitioners Establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre- Annexation Zoning Map designations for the Cascade View Annexation area. Generally bounded by Pacific Hwy. So., Military Rd. So. /24th Ave. So., So. 116th Street, and So. 152nd. Street (see Attachment A). Approximately 581 acres. King County Comprehensive Plan designations are shown in Attachment B to be presented at the public hearing. King County area zoning is shown in Attachment B to be presented at the public hearing. DNS issued (EPIC- 20 -89). A. Cascade View Vicinity Map B. Area -wide Existing Land Use Map with King County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations* C. Task Force Recommended Cascade View Comprehensive Plan Map* D. Task Force Recommended Cascade View Zoning Map to be presented at Planning Commission public hearing of August 10, 1989. STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description: To establish pre - annexation comprehensive plan and zoning designation for the Cascade View annexation area. 2. Existing Development: There are a variety of residential, commercial and light industrial uses located within the 581 acre annexation area. Maximum building height is approximately 7 stories, with the majority being one to three story structures. An existing land use map will be presented at the Planning Commission public hearing. 3. Terrain: The Cascade View area generally slopes toward the east. The angle of this slope steadily increases from gentle in the southern third; to rolling up from Hwy. 99 in the central third; to a plateau 80+ ft. high, 50+ percent slopes from Hwy. 99 within the northern third. 4. Access: North -South access to the Cascade View area is Pacific Hwy. So. and Military Road So. East -west access is provided by So. 144th St., So. 128th St. from the west, and So. 116th Street. South 133rd St., a residential local access street also provides an informal east -west route for south -bound traffic for Hwy. 99 and SR-599 to all areas to the west and north of Cascade View. The road system is generally shown in Attachment D. 5. Public Utilities and Facilities: A full range of urban level public utilities and facilities are, or are readily available, to this area. BACKGROUND 89 -1 -R: Cascade View Rezone Page 2 Cascade View residents have petitioned annexation to the City of Tukwila with pre - annexation zoning. This proposed action is to establish such zoning as well as the comprehensive plan designations for the area. No Zoning Code amendments are proposed. The following 'discussions are organized into three sections • Citizen Involvement • The Plan Development Process • Task Force Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Recommendations. Citizen Involvement Citizen involvement in the pre - annexation zoning process was focused along two avenues: a pre - annexation zoning task force, and public information flyers and meetings. A Pre - Annexation Zoning Task Force was formed from all those area residents, landowners, or interested parties who indicated they wished to participate in this process. All parties were encouraged to participate through information brochures mailed on May 3rd and July 19th to all registered voters and landowners. These brochures also gave notice of the initial public information meeting, subsequent preliminary zoning recommendations and follow -up public meeting where comments were taken. A notice of final Task Force recommendations and the Commission hearing was mailed to all parties on August 1, 1989. Task Force recommendations were developed in seven meetings between May 18th and July 25th (see Plan Development below). Preliminary recommendations were STAFF REPORT to the 89 -1 -R: Cascade View Rezone Planning Commission Page 3 mailed to all registered voters, landowners, and other interested parties for comment at the second public meeting on July 19th. Brochures and information meetings were the primary vehicles for distributing information and soliciting comments. The public will continue to have an opportunity to comment at two City Council hearings after this public hearing and recommendation. Council hearings are anticipated to be held on September 11th and October 16th, as announced in an earlier information brochure. The Plan Development Process Development of the recommended zoning and comprehensive plan was a joint effort by Task Force members and the Planning Staff. Task Force members were instrumental in directing staff work and made all decisions, while Planning staff provided technical information, graphic support and facilitated discussions. Task Force decisions were by general concensus with "votes" usually taken to facilitate discussions. In general, the Task Force followed the plan development process described below: a. Use County zoning as the basis of discussion, b. Identify all "issue sites" for later discussion, c. Review Planning staff site evaluation notes and visit each area, d. Discuss and resolve zoning for each issue site, e. Review map for overall coherence, and f. Revise recommended map as necessary after wide opportunity for public comment through a preliminary zoning map mailed to all registered voters, property owners and interested parties and a public meeting. The final Task Force zoning recommendation was mailed on August 1st to all registered voters voteaplandowners, and other interested parties, along with a notice of the Commission's August 10th meeting. Task Force Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Recommendations The recommended plan generally reflects existing King County zoning as shown in Attachment B to be presented at the public hearing. The Task Force has recommended modifications to the County's zoning to reflect its overall goal: To balance environmental constraints, the needs of existing land uses, the realities of future development, and the need to preserve existing residential neighborhoods. In this balance, the preservation of existing residential neighborhoods shall be given priority. The Task Force recommended comprehensive plan and zoning maps are shown as Attachments C and D. Large versions of these maps will be presented at the public hearing. In general, the recommended zoning and comprehensive plan reflect a land use pattern dominated by commercial and high density residential uses in the southern quarter and along a majority of Hwy. 99; an interior single family core; and a large, 40 acre office zone bi- seating the residential areas, centered around Riverton Hospital. The Task Force spent many hours visiting and discussing the merits of zoning for various specific sites. The results of these specific area discussions have been summarized in the table below. Detailed Task Force findings, conclusions, and recommendations by site, follow the summary table. RECOMM. NUMBER SUMMARY ACTION 1 Up -zone to RMH as most comparable to County's RM1800 zoning. 2 Maintain R -1 -7.2 zoning with Comp. Plan designation "Medium Density Residential" Down -zone to R-3 (3 and 4- plexes at 15 units per acre) and change Comp. Plan to "Public Facilities" from County RM2400 (High Den. Apt. -24 units per acre) /HD (High Density Apt.). Down -zone area to R-2 and R -3 from County RM2400 (Med. Density Apt. -18 units / acre) and CG (General Commercial). Maintain R -1 -7.2 zoning as equivalent to County's RS7200. Maintain R-1-7.2 zoning as equivalent to County RS7200. Down -zone area to R -1 -7.2 from County RM1800 (High density apt -24 units /acre). Down -zone area to R-1-7.2 from County RD3600 (Low density apt.-12 units /acre). 9 Up -zone area to P-O from County RS7200. 10 Change Comp. Plan to "Low Density Res." from County's LD (Low Density Apt.). Maintain existing zoning as R -1 -7.2 as equivalent to County's RS7200. 11 Rezone to R -1 -7.2 with Comp. Plan "High- density Residential" in order to allow City to consider continuing County's "senior housing condition." 12 Rezone to P-0 from County RM900P (Max. Den. -48 units per acre). 13 Rezone to R-4 from County's CG (Gen. Commercial) 14 Rezone_to*1 -7.2 from County RS7200 and two small areas of RD3600. 15 Up- zvelo` I -1 with 115 ht. exception and B.A.R. approval from CG (Gen. Commer- cial) Cascade View Pre- annexation Zoning Task Force Specific Site Recommendations and Analyses VM(it 4 : ' � o ' 4 0 (. ; - .510!..i..,7! n h. — i . 6 ' 71;1 Ofr a kau 2 ' 4' r r §+. • . e ;,p O• ' a rte :mrb d/Qa im .• : Q y n � x...: I CASCADE VIEW LOCATION MAP FOR PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING TASK FORCE SITE SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS AND ANALYSIS August 4, 1989 • , CO d: ' . `FP • I71c the 4 I � UCI-01 .. -1. m 'WI . Gb6 a co0b 1.• • si a S iy_ t: M A p r e �� ewteiow cast cal o � "L 'L C . fit i . .I Cj • o P tj' - • • . \• =Q. CID 9 I a o • 1& ��3 1,.�, \ Qi " •0 0 ° ¢ x. 5. "C- 1'T'1T 'A�dO 5 _ tom . �f 1 • ._ a• a t; ft+ ,SIT a L ' . . 0 0 e �'II! iico ° IS6°3c;�Qo -' UoI ca • '° ' —,_. 3. r lI a l i i I: 1 .; :� I..,.1..'. • rja _' t ° .�� I 1 o ' 1 u It l y r ., .} i.. 11 ! f e I '' �' � ��� �b • .i!.^i*i.'i g_Lj.5o.. �J, q'F t n,.ad q ' o 3' g.1 KNOWS ic, •�'', { i- £CT7bI r71111 • ' t . it 4 V • • ' ' ;4 i, • °° •... •v.. °a 1 - , :' . 1 ,: b • � E311=1 a Q 1 ' I avr — Fro r1,� iri 1 r -Y ' k :1 • aln Skit o •.� . ' • FrIl • 0 OGRE 9 erte, [ J • .1) V �':.. t GI is troirkp: TASK FORCE 'RECOMMENDATION 1 Up -zone to RMH (High Density Multi- Family = 29 units per acre KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM1800 (High Density Multi - Family = 24 units per acre) / HD (High Density Multi - Family) EXISTING LAND USE Single family NUMBER OF. ACRES: 1.0 FINDINGS • 1) Proposed surrounding zoning is RMH on the south and west, C -2 (Regional Retail) to the east and single family to the north. The adjacent streets are heavily traveled. The stability of these five lots as a single family area, when surrounded by higher density uses, is questionable. 3) Significant lot consolidation is required for a viable multi - family project. CONCLUSION PAGE 6 ti 04& pNr 046 At --5 „m a beer r 4 11 I ( � ' I u ! f g n't! S 142ND , 1. 1191 Al. 7ri - -1111^ (Os AC The current King Cou nty,zoning is reasonable in light of surrounding uses. The most appropriate, equivalent Tukwila Zoi a Is RMH. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2 Zone the area R-1-7.2 (Single Family) with Comprehensive Plan designation as Medium Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single Family) with RM2400 potential (Apts -18 units per acre) /SF (Single Family) EXISTING LAND USE Single family and vacant along the 37th Avenue frontage. NUMBER OF ACRES: 1.3 FINDINGS NHlit / ill t4 061 At , nr 14E3 aa— 04 I N Iril IA1.. Lai • 1181 . o4 IAI j — H065 ' r, 1 � r k oii Mc.l 1 ,r, .1A. At 1. r • 11 Iu n 1 . - J . • II[l0 117Vfll wr • • 1 n 11 1 4I ,5+: zooe1 lie i11: : n 1 .1LJ 1UP! ^14 1• AL U II-6 Or :l. ssi [11r ?.1 .. 0111:! I, , I I II r,0 ' I ,/ r 94 1 .1 •fl I I I I •;. I, 1 ,i ; -arr. i i t0 .;t I 1) The expected surrounding land use pattern is high density multi- family to south and east, with strong single family areas to the north and west. ) There are three single family residences in the area which are all reasonably to very well main- tained. 3) Adjacent apartment uses are well buffered from these lots by mature landscaping and fencing. CONCLUSION The long term viability othis area for single family uses is questionable given its location between apartment uses. R -Zing would provide a transition between high density apartments and single family uses. The Task Force does not wish to drive the existing residents from their homes with zoning. It there - fore concludes it reasonable to zone the area R -1 while making future provision for.a transition zone. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 3 Down -zone to R-3 (3 and 4- plexes at 15 units per acre) and change Comprehensive Plan designation to Public Facilities. This is to encourage the loca- tion of public and quasi - public uses, to create a buffer between highway commercial uses and single family uses to the west. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM1800 (High Density Multi - Family = 24 units per acre)/ HD (High Density Multi- Family) EXISTING LAND USE Mixed single and multi - family uses. , NUMBER OF ACRES: 3.1 FINDINGS PAGE 8 a n (NORIH SF) LII 61 • tt ND 14 MSS w 151 –` � �...,� v I10 `� � 411.�IHP4 s 14f� c c_•, ,, �unl , CO ��!' Q ..ql �1� iva t j 1310 ba+c i M oo of 1) An R -3 zone would provide a transition between proposed C -2 (Regional Retail) highway ori- ented uses and westward single family areas. 2) Tri-plex and four -plex structures in R-3 zones can provide a more compatible development with the adjacent single family neighborhood than the 3 story apartments at 22 units per acre allowed in an R-4 zones. 3) A Public Facility designation is usually given to parcels which are the identified sites for a non- profit community facility such as a church, recreation center, or water reservoir. CONCLUSION R-3 zoning and a Cos3p pensive Plan designation of "Public Facility" designation is appropriate as an indicator of community desires. PLANNING STAFF DISCUSSION The Planning staff supports R-3 zoning, but requests the Planning Commission consider options to the "Public Facility" designation. Tukwila has historically used the "Public Facility" designation only for parcels which are currently, or planned for public /quasi -public facilities. In this case, no such public facilities are currently on the site, nor are they likely given the existing land uses in the area. Use of this designation may also mislead residents into thinking that some community facility such as a neighborhood center, or park is planned for this site. No such plans are currently being considered by the City Council. The Planning staff recommends that the Commission consider a Comprehensive Plan designation of Medium Density Residential as being more reflective of anticipated future uses. It will also allow the Comprehensive Plan to be a useful guide in reviewing conditional uses, rezones, variances, and other land use actions. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 4 Down -zone the area to R -2 (duplex -11 units /acre) and R-3 (3 and 4- plexes -15 units /acre) with Com- prehensive Plan as Medium Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM2400 (Medium Density Multi-Family = 18 units per acre) / RR (Residential- Retail Mix); and CG (General Commercial)/ HC (Highway Commerdal). EXISTING LAND USE Single family with one, 4 -unit apartment building. NUMBER OF ACRES: 2.4 FINDINGS CONCLUSION 5) The existing apartment use at the site is approximately R-3 density. An R-3 zone extending from the eastern analysis site boundary up to and including the apartment building would provide a transition area which recognizes adjacent high activity areas to the east, north, and south. R -2 zoning of remaining areas would enhance a buffer for single family areas. 1) The Task Force desires to keep traffic and transient visitors focussed on Hwy. 99 where there is capacity, compatible uses and sites designed to accommodate such activity. This will help to maintain the livability of interior residential neighborhoods. 2 ) Proposed surrounding zoning is R-3 (15 units /acre) to the south, single family (6 units /acre) to the west and north, and C -2 (Regional Retail) to the east. 3) The location of Highway 99, 80 feet to the east, puts the stability of existing single family uses at this site in question. 4) Lower intensit trnulti- family uses in this area would provide a transition zone between single family neighboil oods on the north and west from the high density apartments to the south and commercial uses to the east. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 5 Maintain the existing R-1-7.2 (Single Family) zoning. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single Family) with RM2400 (Apts -18 units per acre) potential / SF (Single Family) EXISTING LAND USE Single family NUMBER OF ACRES: 14.5 FINDINGS CONCLUSION F'Nlit AU K4nI6 AC o / IIr 4 0 0 54 AL i� 0 PL II • t, II ,I II I, I JJ AC--- � .!e I I I II I €� : a I , c it fN —...._ / 4 /u t a ; rr rt,'. ..... t ,.., JO 14 I-. u - . -JLleL ,LH10! d s ,jd .J , 21 44 ' 11 .. 5'• 0 61 Ar. .. ^- /_rr, /I- Irk. —. ` N0..4 .00__ W . n • i i ' it - rnr j ! - pct 1� � •AU 1•. *r 1 t : w 1 :�� --- . v o � L , 04lAtO .. 1 ;f4 . '''' . 0 4 ., ..14065' h r// /r y IRIt / S . �1 ea —. I/1 PION II 4.1 6/ PI if 044 4(1 s a N e Pr) ,a 'r "" I 11.1 1=: r i 1 : 0 14 III 1_, H. 4 046 AL SE t1 e-r 1 � ^1 i t /A / • 0 1 i M[ � ! U ! f M :Hill ! 4 ��� .a l 4 N ,� �, 1 r •l ro_ r� ir e 7n tL LL• — Y r /IJ In � _ � v, bf1 rr11x —i7��� r, — Jf Ta u / _ c / rJt 11t .. —. ii • r , MST (� , t / : r n i ly1 7 it ere /� Sri �' r../ f. er !f t � 114211 I VEI ING rr .a 11 f H 4 1 — n :�. N. 3 • • ry r'. Al fell II'S' c l - -ra_ Nr •e ©ts1 a I 1 4 3 1 _ e0 l •' . rite 20 Ir It II Mr -I .,I � .e i rue AL-PI,. 7.41 I 1. This is a strong_sing,le family area. Yards and structures are well maintained. 2. There is a strong, unanimous Task Force support for preserving single family uses in this area. Zoning should be used to maintain the viability of this neighborhood. An R-1 zone is appropriate. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 6 Maintain R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) zonin KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single family = 6 units /acre) /SF (Single Family). EXISTING LAND USE Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.9 FINDINGS 1) The minimum Tukwila multi -family zone is R-2 Duplex units at 11 units /acre, with the maxi- mum being 29 units /acre. This would mean a maximum unit count of 10 to 26 units at the site, depending on zoning. A realistic estimate is 6 -8 units given Tukwila development standards and lot consolidation. Proposed surrounding zoning is RMH (29 units /acre) to the east, with proposed single family zones to the north, south, and west. 3) Surrounding housing is generally well maintained. 4) A Task Force member submitted a petition signed by over 130 residents in the surrounding area requesting no up- zoning to multi -family uses. The petition will be submitted at the Planning Commission hearing. PAUL .11 i.rg !r Id • (JAA! ?JOA' ROAD) S Y 13OT , l. n I j " tkl 10-4 Y l 10E1 ! !1 CONCLUSION The surrounding single family community is viable and does not desire an expansion of multi-family uses. The existing zoning is appropriate. TASK FORCE 'RECOMMENDATION 7 Down -zone to R-1-7.2 (Single Family) with Comprehensive Plan as Low Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM1800 (High Density Multi - Family = 24 units per acre)/ HD (High Density Multi- Family). EXISTING LAND USE 50% vacant and 50% single family. NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.6 acres (say 28,000 sq.ft.) FINDINGS CONCLUSION r i a lc .—IrriTtsrp—tr. .3.:. 21 rti. MP i� 1/ g al 11 +6 5 ., u• 1. _gl re I • (JAMPJOn Rao) S w T P 1 N "9" 1.c: . 1 :'''''' _ ,i 9 IIM 121a I • :,G� Al:\� • y � iL. (. s • . 6 /e, _ s vy , LC�� S Z t3 P , M 1 it ^) 1 1) Proposed single family zones lie to the east, west and southwest. A C -1 (Neighborhood Business) lies adjacent to the area's northern tip while an RMH multi - family zone lies to the southeast. 2) The down zone would reduce maximum density from 24 units /acre, to 6 units /acre. 3) Direct property access to Hwy. 99 is prohibited by a steep slope. Property access is via a sub- standard, 16 ft. wide alley from 132nd Street. The map shows three closely spaced intersections (i.e. 30-40 ft.), but does not show the steep 15-21% slope on 132nd Street which significantly increases the hazard level. 4) A task force member who owns lots 7 and 8 in the analysis area requests the down -zone, and asserts that all property owners on the west side of the alley support the down -zone. 5) A petition with the signatures of over 130 residents in the immediate area has been submitted to oppose multi-family zoning in this area and will be submitted at the Planning Commission hearing. Lack of access and a demonstrated community preference for single family uses in this area indicates that this area is unsuitable for multi -family use; and that single family zoning is appropriate. • TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 8 Down -zone the three indicated lots R-1-7.2 with Comprehensive Plan as Low Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RD3600. (Low Density Multi - Family =12 units per acre) /SF (Single Family) EXISTING LAND USE Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.22 (9,600 square feet) CONCLUSION FINDINGS 1) Proposed surrounding zoning is C -1 (Neighborhood Business) on the east, and single family in all other. directions. 2) The 130th St. /34 Ave. /Hwy. 99 intersection and immediate segments have very steep grades; making access via other than 33rd Ave. somewhat dangerous. Duplex zoning of these lots may provide 'a feasible access solution by requiring all lots be served by a joint southern access onto 33rd Avenue. Rezone from an equivalent R-2 to R-1-7.2, would reduce expected site density from two units in a single duplex to one single family unit. 5) A petition signed, all surrounding single family residents requested single -family zoning in this area. 'S.: ;.. - ;'•' ' The existing R-2 equivalent multi - family zone is inconsistent with the desires of the surrounding single family neighborhood residents. R-2 zoning is thus a strong, direct, negative element to the viability of this single family neighborhood. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 9 Zone area P-0 (Office) with Conclusion "C" adopted as a Finding. Comprehensive Plan as Office. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single family -6 units /acre) with RM900 po- tential zone (Max. Density Apartments = say 48 units per acre) /CF (Community Facility). EXISTING LAND USE Vacant wooded NUMBER OF ACRES: 24.7 FINDINGS 1) This site is a series of wooded benches (i.e. alter- nating steep and flat areas). The northern half of the site is a steep ravine. 2) Surrounding proposed zoning is R-4 in the north, P-0 in the west, and R -1 -7.2 in the south and east. 3) The Task Force formed an overwhelming consensus that R -3 and R-4 densities were inappropriate at this location due to the lack of compatibility with the strong single family neighborhoods to the immedi- ate south and east. 4) The P-0 (Office) zone pattern of low activity during evenings and weekends, with high activity during the normal working weekday, is very compatible with the surrounding viable single family neighbor- hood. 5) P-0 zoning woukrellow expansion of medical facilities, development of 200+ duplex units, and /or clustering low apertments around a central medical complex using the Planned Residential Develop- ment or Planned Mixed Use Development provisions of the Zoning Code. Any of the above use patterns would allow the provision of a buffer area for adjacent residential areas. Property development has a high potential to dramatically increase traffic along the 130th/132nd road network 6) 7) 8) CONCLUSION N Alit 14 ,,„ tt.4ss • 0,61 Ac. !1 1Ii !.P 1077144 • 111 0 • �s1111 4 QY yr, 2 • • • S — • ;T 121 • 4 o f , t t f f 121 17e102 m • 0.1IAc1 14R 1 2 1 3 6 F .. II ; to 1212 1 tw 1 Highline consultants did not know if P-0 zoning would provide them with the maximum land use potential, while being sensitive to community desires. The Task Force considered six months a reasonable time for the consultant to develop a plan, and for the Task Force to retain the focussed understanding of area land use, zoning, and group cohesion necessary to make a decision consistent with the current set of recommendations. A) A P-0 zone designation would be the most compatible with adjacent residential zones, which also allowed a reasonable property use for the hospital. Development of R -3+ residential densities are inappropriate due to their incompatibility with surrounding single family uses. B) Any property development should mitigate increased traffic from Hwy. 99 to Military Rd. via low capacity residential streets and fully buffer user impacts from surrounding residential neighborhoods. C) Highline Hospital should be given the opportunity to present a development proposal to the Task Force for a formal recommendation. Any subsequent Task Force recommendation should supersede its earlier recommendations in Planning Commission and Council deliberations. This opportunity should lapse six months from August 1, 1989. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 10 Retain comparable R-1-7.2 (Single Family) zoning, but change Comprehensive Plan to Low Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single family - 6 units per acre) with Potential RD3600 (Low Density Multi - family - 12 units per acre)/ LD (Low Density Multi- family) EXISTING LAND USE CONCLUSION -4 ERICKSON 3.31 Ac EY I. STEWART J.5 Ac aJf�( •6,4 . \\ /L Ma — 1 .. FRANK I. — � • IHU HAPKA p A4 108 Ac Pi vr vs N RICHARD I. t FLORENCE E YOUNG Ac. .L.J,„ *XI TED HANKER 0 I.46 AC. ATI Pi fN , f,.N RICHARD J. FR NUN 1.63 Ac. �L fOr fl,L„L Jig r; J. H. GARDNER a 04 AL f/ o) flat J,l '.f). .14.J __ PROGRESSIVE CARE � I - -- E - ---- - - + F ; 3 n f ava I 4 I J (TL.fss ,i • 0.61 uuu ._ _: The Task Force had no concern about continuing the existing single family zone designation. • • • Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 6.9 FINDINGS 1) The site is composed of portions of three lots which run east -west down to Hwy.99 which is the sole access point. 2) Access to Hwy. 99 requires traversing a difficult 30+ percent slope. 3) Discussions with Rainier Vista Sewer District staff revealed slides on 25-30 percent slopes which uncovered their sewer lines in the immediate area. This indicates potential surficial hillside instability. 4) There is a flat benched area running across portions of all three lots. The remaining hillside areas upslope the " existing Hwy. 99 developments, have 24-30 +percent slopes. /0 _. I ..a_-. 0 1 11 te - - -8- - - 11 -.--- — _- ...:4! " - il 3 � . Y 6a1/3--- 10 1 RffSrpier a 1e ` a � �� � , , 1/'al . O..W.'9. -- ' . . .. 1- _ - • _._. - it e 1 e .. -. .. l!t . J!� i 1 It410 1 1 FRANK , � APK111 • RICIIARO E t Fl YOUNG !A1 Ac -II/ Ac• - - -- 1 ~- II--__ "4, I 1 IOA At I I NI 1 :y,i ;° Pi e,t Mf1 V , , = ` li 1/!! „ . l ' t r j � �I1: 3, I. I � . 1 i. 1 .' �; , 1 A . R . f. ERICKSON J31Ac. }e rIa! . TEO NAKKE 1.16 71 ,l! • �• ») t _ X 1 x i RICHARD J ISE J�el_L!!1 J.N. GI i t o t I11��;L A UDREY l STEWART R J.SIAc `. . 4 e. 1 AI ll�1r ' -ii)di j '1Y- -- p O _ ■ l a ,I l ! •'”' e0 J PROGRESSIVE CARE ,alt, ==-- $7,.= i27rHJJ"-���tST. -1_ - � �.6w At II 11! rl / %1] a TN • el•• ♦ t. N • 1 - T N • a • 1 1 .e ..... r. .1 a .y• • Witt 1 .d .... TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 11 Zone to R -1 -7.2 with Comprehensive Plan desig- nation "High- density Residential ". KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM2400P (Medium Density Multi - Family - say 18 units per acre) /LD (Low Density Multi - Family). EXISTING LAND USE Vacant wooded area. NUMBER OF ACRES: 6.8 CONCLUSIONS rnuc. .10 FINDINGS 1) The existing County zoning carries a condition of allowing only senior (55 +) housing. This condition was established after extensive community participation in this parcel's rezone, and after developer agreement to the condition. 2) Continuation of this condition with an appropriate Tukwila zone would be possible by estab- lishing an R-1-7.2 zone, Comprehensive Plan designation of High Density Residential, and adopting this finding that R-4 is an appropriate zone only with a "senior housing only" condi- tion. 3) Re- establishing the existing senior housing condition could be done during a later quasi- judicial rezone of the site to R-4. The maximum R-4 density (22 units /acre) allowed would result in increased maximum County RM2400 density (18 units /acre). Site access is farbelow Tukwila standards. The long term development of the site as senior housing could be appropriate and compatible with surrounding uses if adequate access could be demonstrated. This action would provide for a poten- tial up -zone from existing County density, upon re- establishment of the current development condi- tion. * TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 12 Rezone to P.O (Office). Retain existing Compre- hensive Plan "Office" designation. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM900P (Max. Density Multi - Family - 48 units/ acre) with a small corner of RD3600 (12 units per acre) at the western limit /Office. EXISTING LAND USE Vacant and single family. NUMBER OF ACRES: 2.4 FINDINGS 1) The existing small lot pattern and shallow lot depth (160 ft.) limits the ability to develop a qual- ity project at RMH or R-4 densities. The low or marginal quality development encouraged by RMH /R-4 zoning in this area would significantly degrade the viability of single family uses to the immediate north and across So. 127th Street; especially if lots adjacent to So. 127th St. were later rezoned for development. 3) P-0 zoning would provide a reasonable use for lots adjacent to So. 128th St. and a transition to single family uses in the immediate north. CONCLUSION PAGt 1/ 14 It ► ii,,, l 1 9 L �j PROGRE_ CIVE. CARE 7, - s - -. -,�- - - -- - m,. Ac " _►tlu I i ;M y . 1 1 ; ,ry . , E i, is i t 1:11171,1 08/ Ac j ' If It! It. t. ERICKSIIN 331At, AUDREY L SIEWART J.51 Ac FP ST 121 'rm. • I 46 1t RICIIARO J. 1.85 roe 'au!. JAI. GAI E 04 ,,JI if ,,, Y:u, P-0 zoning would ::preserve the existing residential neighborhood, while allowing a reasonable range of use to property owners. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 13 Zone R-4 (Low Apts. -22 units per acre) with Comprehensive Plan as High Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CG (General Commercial) /HD (Highway Oriented Business) and a small triangle of RM2400 (18 units per acre) /LD (Low Den. Multi- family) EXISTING LAND USE Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 7 FINDINGS CONCLUSION lS FRANK L NAPKA 108 At • .. 1,0 ! .i ••I I • 1 I I I r I I .t ' f I, MI I (° I24I0 .' I L Nr;•II.,, t w+ I I. I I . RICHARD L t FLOHENLE E • IOUMG EA % %III' V Is 7 • J., 1) This is a steeply opIng site with 23-30+ percent grades throughout. 2) There is no access to Hwy. 99. 3) Assessor records indicate this parcel is owned by the same parties who own the Woodridge Apts. to the immediate west. The Woodridge parcel is zoned R-4. It is reasonable to recognize that this parcel has no significant highway orientation, but an immediate connection to the adjacent R-4 zoned parcel. Thus, R-4 zoning is appropriate. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 14 Zone the area R -1 -7.2 (Single Family with Comprehensive Plan as Low Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING / COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 (Single family) with RD3600 (12 units /acre) potential zone in the eastern half of this strip. There are also two areas of RD3600 zoning in the eastern half of this strip. Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Apt. in the east- ern half and Single Family in the western half. EXISTING LAND USE Vacant and single family. NUMBER OF ACRES: 27.5 FINDINGS 1) Staff is not able to identify any significant physical differences between lots in this area, nor does there seem to be any Comprehen- sive Plan policy basis for such distinctions; even rec- ognizing the wide latitude given to cities to make this discrimination in area -wide zoning actions. 2) There are two requests to the Task Force for the eventual R -2 (Duplex) rezoning of R -1 lots in the western half of this strip. These are in addition to two existing County RD3600 apartment zones in the area. I �1 k I- ,. OTH i s zvS .fie 3 4 •I , 19 y 7 1, N Q eo EV Je I 11.11 IJ , �,rrr -- It . 16 - 1 — - -t � 4i It y erg- r -m-rl: -Ert „ ,u 1 .9' 6 4 rit iedaiL:L_lf2nm- te ) - .) -• 1:171• -,a..._ S ..- 1 1 t, -r •_ ' 1 • 1 „ .e 1 I .. — s lir ii _ _'11110 LJ ID l • It 0 '''I i 1 ti 1 ! 'V' "m 2 9 .e - - t177/ - to llt2 - t VTTfd -- It t0 1 + to N 111.14111 It >r1 - , - - 1 .J, 11.1 � It® - -Of d.12 Ir,© » , Inv- -- • • a'• 14. • m•1, ' 11; 1' T9 4 Ac 1114 4,7• r 0 1 .67 Ac • 0; 131 IL. ` 22 .r5, 1 15 ti ,0 ,e ti N 1 1 on II 1 vi 1 ` 1 ‘- 1 )$1'n)., c , . 11' . L ,U \. 1 a, •.Iv 1 i • •, NI + �° tL,10 ' e •111 At• - 1 I , M 3. n/ r 1 I el t :i 4 1 at 7 La 1 r, I - - • - L .00 a reel__ 11 4 20 r 25 .a x RII! m 1 ` •r u,�by -.� 1 i Ail r, 11 .1 Ittl S t i Its 1 ``�� � 1ti ! ��il ,._t: N S r m+ 1 -- , .,...,,.. •,T I w, .. 1I w 1 u I 1 il ••■•■ "Q . Q' Hilltop 91, Park I rr 1' ' 11 II 11 11 _ - I III''!{_ • 1:.1 1 , l -- t... i 0.110 8TH., • t,RAYLIOII SM I4 • l,. ,e R. F. ERICILSUIN 331 Ac T C ERA HP AUDREY I. 51EWAI 3.51 Ac ST 3) Staff has had contact with several individuals wanting to keep the area single family use. 4) Establishing a transitional strip adjacent to the R -4 zone would result in an untenable single family strip, 1-2 lots deep, between Military Rd. and the duplex zone. Eventual rezone of any such R -1 strip to R -2 uses should be expected. CONCLUSION Continuing the existing RD3600 zones and approving the two up -zone requests to R -2 would result in the eventual conversion of this area to R -2 uses; as apartments began to make single family uses less viable and conversion requests more numerous. Planning staff would be hard pressed to recommend denial of such rezone requests in light of no significant differences between R -1 and possible R -2 parcels in this area. The Task Force concludes that its goal of preserving viable residential areas is best served by zoning the area R -1. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 15 Rezone M -1, with 115 height exception with BAR approval (18.50.040). KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CG (General Commercial) /HC (Highway Oriented Business) EXISTING LAND USE Truck /heavy equipment sales and storage. NUMBER OF ACRES: 12.0 FINDINGS 1) The site is located at foot of steeply sloped, benched hillside with apartments at the top of slope to west and north. 2) Construction in the western portion is difficult due to steep slopes with possible high groundwater levels. Access to northern two-thirds is currently only via an earth ramp from the southern one -third of site. There is no direct access to High- way 99 from northern portion without extensive site work. 3) An approximately seventy -five foot high steep slope separates up -slope apartments to west and north, thereby isolating the site and orienting it toward the M -2 zone across Hwy. 99 to the east. 4) Most of front property is at elev. 80-90. The maximum 115 ft. building height would reach the foot of the lowest upslope apartment at 190 ft. 5) The proposed zone designation would make any development be subject to design review since it is within 300 ft. of a residential zone; and if it exceeds the basic M -1 height limits. Residents and property owners would be notified and given an opportunity to comment when.a specific project is proposed. CONCLUSION The proposed zone is appropriate since it is consistent with the existing use, is oriented toward other heavy and light industrial zones toward the east and Hwy. 99, development impacts would be largely isolated from residential zones, and adjacent residents would be given an opportunity to comment on project design. PLANNING STAFF DISCUSSION ,PAYI•)4 C•MI 1II 1 4 1 At. • Je t 1 FRANK L IIAPKA I OA Al RICHARD I. I FLORENLE E FOUR& 2A1 Ac Il J. %III, v �. r✓. JO • I- • Tr • JJ. It R. F. ERICKSUN 331 At. r ft AMSUNIA OLSIMOHt CO. ES SUI IN Je6A IHONAS Ills WIL 111A S ?M This site is at a prominent gateway location to the City. The current C-G designation makes the existing use in the County a nonconforming use. The comparable Tukwila zone would be C -2 which would also make the existing use nonconforming. The Task Force has recommended M -1 which would make the existing use conforming. The M -1 zone allows outdoor industrial operations and storage. The design quality of industrial buildings are generally limited by their function. The Planning Commission may wish to consider the following three options in its deliberation and recom- mendations: A. Task Force recommended M -1 B. Comparable zoning C -2 C. Industrial use C -M. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 16 Upzone to R-4 (Low Apartments - 22 units per acre) with Comprehensive Plan as High Density Residential. KING COUNTY ZONING/ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM2400 (18 units per acre) /LD (Low Density) Apts. EXISTING LAND USE Three and four story apartments. NUMBER OF ACRES: 12 FINDINGS CONCLUSION 1101 ' 12410 FRANK I. HAPKA •II /At• - _ IUa At ..I a .1 NV =7 C,'�afz A 2rt! Iw J 40!10 2 4 • — L J 1ltt 1;i tto u � t--I-- — { It1? i .• , rl. - F —T y LS= ^72�1RD� 1;75E1 = CJ 1 IZ l1 L L- — — !tr t U t' 3„, j e - S J — �,��c�llfi I t o +o Atl .I . 1 rrKAYI )'1 '•MII11 141 At. • rH Li e Hid T 1) Sites are generally developed as three and four story apartments at R-4 and RMH densities. 2) Sites are separated from adjacent single family uses by a 25 ft. change in elevation and screened by a variety of vegetation. Three story structures are thus not visible from most single family areas while four story structures may be marginally visible. 3) An area Task Force member indicated a desire to limit future structure height to a three story maximum to preserve the viability of adjacent single family areas. The existing three story apartment buildings allowed in R-4 zones are the maximum structures ap- propriate to these sites in order to preserve adjacent single family areas. STAFF REPORT to the 89 -1 -R: Cascade View Rezone Planning , Commission PAGE 22 The Planning Division generally concludes that the Task Force recommended zoning and comprehensive plan, strikes a reasonable balance between the Natural Environment, Residence, and Commerce /Industry Element goals of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan.: Staff concludes that. Recommendations 3 and 16 should be re- evaluated in light of previous departmental comments in the site specific evaluations. Not withstanding further new information presented at the Planning Commission public hearing, the Planning Division recommends that the Task : Force recommended Comprehensive Plan and Zoning (Attachments C and D) be used as the basis for its formal actions and modifications: - LEGEND NT CASCADE VIEW Riverton TUKWILA Thorndyke .� �.. Tukwila City Limits .�.�.� Sea Tac City Limits Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE i rmCNmevTD COMP PLAN HIGH DENSITY NISIDENTIAL .4Y PLEASE Nora REVISED N.1.7,1 AND P.O • ZONING IN NORTHWEST ticTipM •' • 1: . • I, :.•1 N.1.7.2 dN1 7.1 I, MEVee)� � ro 40.41. /,C•2 . . P O N.4 • COME PLAN COMMERCIAL a I 1 • ‘ '11 • • 1 I 4 • •; • *1•.n, .Ir $ l.. 1 . }. • N.I. N.2 11.3 11.4 RMI) P.O C., C•2 M•1 TASK FORCE ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION .2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 3 AND 4 TOWNHOUSES LOW DENSITY APARTMENTS HIGH DENSITY APARTMENTS OFRIC /R•2 COMMUNITY RETAIL REGIONAL RETAIL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL *TASK FORCE COMPOSED OF AREA RESIDENTS AND LAND OWNERS CITY COUNCIL WILL MAKE FINAL DECISION ON OCTOBER 16TH 1989 A LARGER DETAILED MAP IS AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL FOR REVIEW. CONTACT VERNON UMETSU 433.165S NUN • � 141116 S► I•. C4 4•1■.► E+ISI IT '.. ' ' .:'. +, ' r �,:, r• a • 1 ' 6/AC 11 /AC 11 /AC 22 /AC 30 /AC ,, 25 o f 7/3I/99 • CASE NUMBER: REQUEST: OLD BUSINESS CASE NUMBER: REQUEST: AGENDA VI DIRECTOR'S REPORT Review how conditions are implemented in the permit process. VII ADJOURNMENT City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor PLANNING COMMISSION /BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Thursday, August 24, 1989 8:00 p.m. - Council Chambers in City Hall I CALL TO ORDER II ATTENDANCE III APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 10, 1989 IV NEW BUSINESS Planning Conunission/Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing (i/y/v/AY 89- 1 -SPE, 89 -7 -DR, 89 -1 -CUP: South Central School District #406 There are three separate requests for the new Foster High School: 1. A Cooperative Parking Agreement. 2. Design Review. 3. Conditional Use Permit. Planning Commission Public Meeting 89 -3-R: Cascade View Pre - annexation Zoning 89- 2-CPA: Cascade View Comprehensive Plan Establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre - annexation zoning for the Cascade View Annexation area. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION AUG 10, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Jim Haggerton. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Cagle, Flesher, Kirsop, and Knudson. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Vernon Umetsu, and Joanne Johnson. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. CAGLE SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE THE JULY 27, 1989 MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Chairman Haggerton reviewed the procedure for this public hear- ing, indicating that public testimony would be taken at this meeting; and a decision would be made at the August 27, 1989 Planning Commission meeting. 89 -3 -R & 89 -2 -CPA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION - Request to establish Comprehensive Plan Map and Pre - annexation Zoning Map designations for the Cascade View Annexation area. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report which was entered into the record as Exhibit A. He pointed out the intent of the Task Force on existing uses and expected uses on a large display map emphasizing the single family characteristics of the area which is also in compliance with the goals and policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. The Public Hearing was opened. David Livermore, 13212 - 31st Avenue S., spoke representing the Task Force. He stated that the intent of the Task Force was to preserve as much Single Family character as practical without undue hardship. Planning Commission August 10, 1989 Page 2 Adele Scott, 13020 - 34th Avenue S. pointed out the location of her property on the display map. She felt areas designated on the display map as 6 and 8 should have a single family designa- tion. She presented a petition supporting a Single Family designation for Areas 6 and 8 which was entered into the record as Exhibit "B ". John Welch, 2700 S. 133rd, pointed out his property on the display map stating he did not want to be locked into a P.O. zone and preferred M -1 zoning designation to P.O., Single Family, or C -2 zoning designation. Leslie Brown, 12010 - 26th Avenue S. pointed out his property on the display map, stating he preferred a R -4 zoning designation for his property. Floyd Thistle, 3226 S. 130th, asked that the Task Force recommen- dations for the annexation area be upheld. He also supported the formation of a Community Municipal Council. Montana Cooter, 12915 Pacific Highway S. pointed out that the lots adjacent to Riverton Hospital were very unstable and she felt it may threaten her property below if they are developed. Robert Boren, 12471 Pacific Highway S. wanted his name added to the mailing list and also wanted the C -2 zoning designation to remain on the property to the south of Area 10. Bernardo Salle, 5611 S. Ryon Street, preferred that Areas 6 and 8 reflect a zoning designation that permits a 4 -plex. He felt that this area is not conducive to single family. Bob Kaye, 3715 S. 141st, owns two lots. He has a 13 unit apart- ment complex on one lot and the other lot he would like changed from a suggested R -3 designation to R -4 designation. Larry Swedeluis, 3131 S. 133rd, pointed out his property on the display map. He favored maintaining the single family quality as much as possible and was opposed to any apartments being built. Robert Boe, 13515 - 35th Avenue S. felt that the Task Force worked hard to be fair and wants the Task Force recommendations upheld. Bernard Salle wanted the Planning Commission not to forget the local businessman. He felt the area is getting more and more foreign businesses. Floyd Thistle was opposed to any more apartment zoning taking place and wants single family neighborhood quality preserved. f Planning Commission August 10, 1989 Page 3 He supported the Task Force recommendations. The Public Hearing was closed at 9:00 p.m. The Chairman noted that a decision will be made at the August 24, 1989 Planning Commission hearing. DIRECTORS REPORT Jack Pace, Senior Planner stated that Monday, September 25, 1989 at 7 :00 p.m. has been set aside to review the City's Wetland areas. .ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9 :05 p.m. Respectfully' submitted, Joanne Johnson, Secretary City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433 -1800 1908 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Tukwila Planning Commission To: From: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner RE: 89 -2 -CPA and 89 -3 -R (Cascade View Pre - annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning) -- 'Staff record of public hearing testimony. The following location map and comment sheets summarize the testimony presented at the Planning Commission public hearing of August 10, 1989. .M Please do not hesitate to telephone me at 433 -1858 if I can be further assistance. 116th 120th 128th 133rd 138th 144th 150th 1 o. 9. e °. R , V " . 9.0 C 7 ,� ■ i1r • rJ, VT .)MO f/ u;? c3 i. .u. f 0. 4. ` IT:; ii c,- d u. ,„,v--. ti 0% \-\\\ i ;;; Cascade View Pre - annexation Zoning Comment Location Map Numbers are Task Force comments. Letters are Public Hearing comments. August 16, 1989 S..A•1�1ti 1. , 1 4,^ ,d1 ; ' C6 i a Q 9 ° y ° ma = r laird 1:)!1'1651 Q1: COMMENTATOR. A Bob Kaye,. Area Resident 3715 So. 141st Street COMMENT Lots 2 and 3 of Area 3 should be zoned R -4 (Low Apts. - 22 units per acre). There is already a 13 unit, low apartment building on Lot 2. Area uses are more in keeping with an R -4 zone than R -3 (3 and 4 -plex units - 15 units per acre). . COUNTY BONING RM1800 (High Density Multi- family - 24 units per acre). TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION .R -3 (Three and Four Family Dwellings - 15 units per acre) COMMENTATOR B Bernardo Salle, Task Force Member and Area Land /Business owner 13003 Pacific Hwy. South (Live Butcher) COMET Areas 6 and 8 should be zoned for multi - family use Area 8 i currently zoned for multi- family use in King. County.. Neither area is appropriate for single family use. The general area is growing and housing will be needed. He would like to develop 4- plex units on these properties. Consideration should be given to the survival of the local business owner. Almost all new businesses have been based on foreign ownership or capital. COUNTY ZONING Area 6 RS7200 (Single Family) Area 8 -. RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family - 12 units per acre). TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Zone both areas R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR C Adele Scott, Task Force Member and Area Resident 13020 34th Avenue So. . COMMENT Supports Task. Force recommended R - 1 -7.2 zoning in Areas 6 and 8..• Submitted a petition with 117 signatures supporting R -1 zoning of Areas . 4 and 8. COUNTY ZONING Area 6 - RS7200 (Single Family) Area 8 .- RD3600 (Low Density Multi-family = 12 units per acre) . TASK FORCE RECON=NDATIO)i Zone both areas as R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR D Floyd Thistle, Task Force Member and Area Resident 3226 So. 130th Street COLT Strongly urges the adoption and long term implementation of Task Force Zoning and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. Specifically: spoke against testimony which urged up zoning Areas 6 and (see B. Salle). COUNTY ZONING Area 6 - RS7200 (Single Family) Area 8 - RD3600 (Low Density Multi - family = 12 units per acre). TASK . FORCE RECOMMENDATION Zone both areas as R - 1 - 7 2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR E Montana M. Cooter, Area Resident 12915 Pacific Hwy. So. COMMENT Very concerned about increased landslide and storm water runoff hazard from Area 9 development on down slope properties. Pointed out heavy clay and water content in Area 9 soils. COUNTY ZONING Area 9. zoning is: RS7200.(Single Family) with Potential RM900 (Max. Density'Multi family - 48 units per acre) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Up zone to.P -O (Office) COMMENTATOR F Robert Boren, Area,Landowner : 12471 Pacific Hwy. So. COMMENT Wanted to, know what was the proposed zoning for his property at 12471 Pacific Hwy. South. He is satisfied with the recommended C -2 (Regional Retail) equivalent to the County's CG (General Commercial) zone. Agreed with Commissioner comment that the up slope area zoned RS7200 (Single Family) presents a difficult situation due to steep slopes and wet soils. Thought that City was trying to sneak through zoning without letting the public know, but is satisfied with staff explanation of public notice prccedures, meetings, and being assured that he will be notified of future public hearings. A follow -up staff phone call confirmed that he is satisfied with recommended zoning and the public involvement process. COUNTY ZONING CG (General Commercial) for flat areas adjacent to Hwy.99 and RS7200 (Single Family) with Potential RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family = 12 units per acre) for up slope areas. Comprehensive Plan is Low Density Multi- family for up slope areas. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION C -2 (Regional Retail) for flat areas adjacent to Hwy. 99 and R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) for up slope areas. Comprehensive Plan is Low Density Residential for up slope areas.. COMMENTATOR G Leslie R. Brown, Area Resident 12010 26th Avenue So. COMMENT Establish an R -4 zone at the northern limit of Area 14. COUNTY ZONING RS7200 (Single Family) with Potential RD3600 (Low Density Multi- family 12 units per acre) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Maintain equivalent zoning of R -1 -7.2 (Single Family) COMMENTATOR H COUNTY ZONING John Welch, Task Force Member and Area Land /Business Owner 2700 So. 133rd Street (Valley Trucking) COMMENT Supports Task Force recommended M -1 zoning for Area 15. M -1 reflects a relationship with M-2 (Heavy Industrial) and M -1 (Light Industrial) areas immediately east of Hwy. 99. Agrees that the existing heavy equipment sales and rental business is not an economical use of this valuable property and that it is not the most visually presentable for this site. He would like to relocate to less valuable location (i.e. in Sumner) if this property can be developed for some higher quality use. He is working with a developer toward an office development. But wants to maximize his flexibility should these immediate negotiations fall through. The retail uses permitted in a C -2 zone would not be market feasible in this location. C -2 constraints on use may force him to remain in this location instead of developing a higher quality use and moving to lower priced property. CG (General Commercial) TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION Up -zone to M -1 (Light. Industrial) 3. COMMENTATOR I -David Livermore, Task Force Spokesperson 13212 31st Avenue So. and Area Resident COMMENT Discussed Task Force area -wide plan development activities and the priority goal of preserving single family residential areas. He will be available for Commission clarifying questions on Task Force findings, conclusions and recommendations. COMMENTATOR J Larry Swedeluis, Task Force Member and Area Resident 3131 So. 133rd Street COMMENT There are many viable single family areas. The key to maintaining this viability is retaining as much single family neighborhood area as possible. Apartment zoning brings short- term residents who do not stay long enough to form an attachment to the neighborhood and the various attendant problems. COMMENTATOR K Robert Boe Task Force Member and Area Resident 13514 35th Avenue So. COMMENT The Task Force did a good job in developing the recommended Zoning and Comprehensive Plan recommendations. He supports the Task Force recommendations. COUNTY ZONING See Attachment B, King County Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Map. TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION See Attachment D, Task Force Recommended Zoning Map. NOTICE OF.INTENTION TO ANNE; THE CASCADE VIEW AREA BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA Prepared by the Tnkvila Departaent of Community Developlent CITY OF T UKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 June 21, 1989 PHONE # (2061 433.1800 Ms. Aida H. Wilkinson, Executive Secretary Ring County Boundary Review Board Room W378, Ring County Courthouse Seattle, WA 98104 Gary L. PanDusen. Jluyur Subject: Notice of Intention - Cascade Annexation Dear Ms. Wilkinson, I am pleased to officially notify the Boundary Review Board that the City of Tukwila has received a petition for the annexation area referred to as "Cascade View" to the City of Tukwila. The petition is for the election method of annexation, and has been certified for correctness by the Ring County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and certified for sufficiency by the Tukwila City Clerk. Enclosed is one original and eight copies of the Notice of Intention to annex Cascade View, along with the $50 filing fee. Please don't hesitate to call Vernon Umetsu of my staff at 433- 1858 if we can be of any assistance. S Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor �� VU /adf Enclosure LIST OF ATTACHMENTS A. Legal description, Cascade View Annexation Area B. Vicinity map of the Cascade View Annexation Area C. Set of Assessor Maps of the Cascade View Annexation Area D. County Prosecutor's Office Certification of Annexation Petition E. Tukwila City Clerk Certification of Signature Sufficiency F. Cascade View Service /Fiscal Analysis G. Tukwila City Council Resolution H. Environmental Determination of Non - significance I. Water District Boundaries J. Sewer District Boundaries R. Water District Service Points L. Sewer District Service Points M. School District Boundaries N. Fire District Boundaries O. Public Facilities Guide P. Tukwila Planning Commission Recommended Zoning Q. Ring County Zoning CASCADE VIEW NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ANNEX This submittal is structured in coordination with the King County Boundary Review Board "Notice of Intention Format" adopted on November 10, 1988. The BRB document should be referred to when reviewing the Tukwila submittal below. I. BACKGROUND /NAPS 1. The Tukwila City Council is responding to a petition from residents in the Cascade View area, requesting annexation to the City. This petition requests an election method annexation with pre- annexation zoning for the area described in Attachment A and shown on attachments B and C. The annexation is proposed under the applicable provisions of RCW 35A.14.020, 050 and 100, and 36.93.100 and 160. The petition has been certified as acceptable by the County Prosecutor's Office (Attachment D) and the Tukwila City Clerk (Attachment E). This area was previously reviewed by the B.R.B. in coordinated public hearings on the Sea -Tac Incorporation, and petitions from the Riverton, Foster, and Thorndyke areas for annexation to Tukwila. The Board decided to remove the three annexation areas as well as the Cascade View area from the City of Sea -Tac boundaries to allow residents an opportunity to vote on joining Tukwila. Upon annexation of the three areas to Tukwila, Cascade View became contiguous with the City, and residents submitted their previously prepared annexation petition. To date, the City has completed a public service /fiscal analysis (Attachment F), and adopted a resolution directing staff to pursue the annexation (Attachment G). Pre - annexation zoning recommendations are now being reviewed by the City Council after extensive work by an area task force; public information meetings, brochures and flyers; and a Planning Commission public hearing. 2. Attachment G is a certified copy of the Tukwila City Council resolution accepting the annexation proposal. 3. Attachment H is a. copy of the SEPA checklist and Determination of Non - significance issued on July 24, 1989. 4. A legal description of the area has been submitted earlier in this report as Attachment A. This description has been given preliminary approval by the King County Public Works Department. 5. A. Attachment B shows the Cascade View area and contiguous corporate limits, while Attachment C is a set of King County Assessor maps of the area. The size of the annexation area is approximately 581 acres. The area is generally fully served with sewer and water facilities as shown in attachments G through M. B. Attachments G through 0 show the boundaries of all units of government in the areas, as well as the community facilities in the area. No tax lots would be separated by this proposal. C. Attachment B delineates Tukwila's corporate limits with the outline of the proposed annexation area. II. FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER 1. Overview The population of the Cascade area is estimated to be 3,061. Its size is estimated at 581 acres, which means a population density of 5.3 people per acre. The assessed valuation of the area is $100,900,502, which means there is a per capita assessed valuation of $32,963. 2. Land Use Tukwila's recommended zoning map (Attachment P) generally reflects existing land use. Cascade View land use can be visualized in three sections. North (from the 116th St. northern boundary to 128th St.) - Single family housing and three large multifamily developments dominate the western plateau. Steep east - facing slopes are largely vacant, and separate light industrial and strip commercial uses along Hwy. 99 from plateau residential areas. Central (between 128th and 140th) - Predominantly single - family development units with pockets of multifamily units and commercial uses along Highway 99. The area contains Riverton Hospital, Cascade View Elementary School, and Riverton Cemetery (Attachment 0). South (area south of 140th) - Predominantly multifamily and commercial use mix except for the northwest quadrant which is largely a single - family dwelling area. The land uses envisioned by King County and the City of Tukwila are discussed in Section 3 below. -2- 3. Comprehensive Plan /Ordinances A. King County Comprehensive Plan /Ordinances The Cascade Annexation proposal relates to Section III, Regional Planning and Intergovernmental Cooperation, page 32 of the King County Comprehensive Plan (1985). The following plan policies would support approval of the subject annexation to Tukwila. PI -302 King County should work with the cities to focus growth within their boundaries and should support annexations when consistent with the King County Comprehensive Plan. King County should support incorporations when formation of cities is appropriate to assure adequate facilities and services for growth consistent with the Plan. PI -303 King County should play an active role in municipal annexations, supporting them when consistent with land use plans, and opposing them when inconsistent. Land use in the Cascade annexation area is guided by King County's Highline Plan. The general provisions of this plan are reflected in County Zoning as shown in Attachment Q. The King County Comprehensive Land Use Plan envisions multifamily housing and commercial development along the northern third of the area. An exception to this is a small strip of single - family homes along Military Road. The central annexation area is envisioned (by County potential zoning notations) as a central core of single family uses bounded on the north, east and south by high /moderate density multifamily and commercial uses. Public services, i.e., Riverton hospital, clinics, Cascade Elementary School and Riverton Cemetery would also be located in this area. Finally, the southern third of the annexation area is planned for multifamily housing and commercial facilities. This analysis recognizes County potential zoning notations which indicate the possibility of rezoning a large four block area in the northwest corner from single family to moderate density multi - family (24 units per acre). Tukwila codes would replace specific King County regulations as follows: a) King County Sewer /Water and Sewage Plans -- Existing purveyors remain the same. -3- b) Agriculture uses and soils -- Not applicable. There are no agricultural uses in area. c) Sensitive Areas -- Tukwila relies upon its Zoning Code and SEPA to ensure that slope development is responsible. A Sensitive Area Ordinance is currently being drafted for the Council review in December 1989. e) Protection and preservation of landmarks, landmark sites and districts -- Tukwila uses King County's Historic Preservation Office, the State Archaeologist, and SEPA to regulate historical sites. f) Surface Water Management - Tukwila created a surface water utility on July 17, 1989 (Ord. 1523). Management standards will generally reflect King County standards and will be consistent with the Green River Management Agreement. B. Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Cascade View is not covered by Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan. An amendment to this plan and area zoning has been developed by a task force of area residents and landowners. The Planning Commission has held a public hearing and recommended adoption of the task force proposed Comprehensive Plan and Zoning. Recommended zoning reflects the Comprehensive Plan and is shown in Attachment P. The City Council is currently considering the Planning Commission's recommendations and will hold public hearings on September 11th and October 16th. Council action to establish pre - annexation zoning and comprehensive plan designations is expected on October 16th. 4. Planning Data A. Revenues /Expenditures A public service /fiscal analysis for the Cascade View area has estimated approximately $738,000 of revenues and $650,000 to $895,000 in current expenses. Capital costs are estimated at $250,000. It is estimated that the County would lose $584,000 in road and other dedicated revenues. The County expenditure reduction as a result of this annexation is not known due to its regional allocation of resources. The primary reduction areas are police, courts, -4- and roads. At Tukwila service levels, these area expenditures are estimated between $445,000 to $620,000. Fire district revenue lost is estimated at $151,400. Fire district expenditure reduction is difficult to calculate due to scale economies. That is, a certain unknown level of fire resources is required to serve the remaining district. The cost of Tukwila fire service to this area is estimated at $15,000 to $30,000. Only a small marginal fire resource increase is required due to the heavy capital and personnel expansions recently completed by the City. B. Services Water is currently provided to the Cascade area through Water District 125 and 20. A small segment of the area is also located within the Seattle Municipal Water District. Attachments I and K show water district boundaries and service points in this area. No changes in the water purveyors serving Cascade View are planned. Sewer service is provided by the Rainier Vista and Val -Vue districts. Attachments J and L show sewer district boundaries and service points. No changes in sewer service purveyors serving Cascade View are planned. The nearest fire Stations to the Cascade annexation area are Tukwila fire stations #53 and #52, and Fire District No. 11 Station No. 14 (Attachment 0). All Tukwila stations are staffed with full -time personnel while Station No. 14 is staffed with a combination of full -time and volunteer personnel. Tukwila would provide fire protection to this area upon annexation. Response times are estimated at less than four minutes. 5. General A. No annexation agreement has been required for the extensions of services to this area. B. The annexation area is located within the Lower Green River drainage basin, and is largely a plateau above the river valley floor. There are steep (40+ percent), east facing slopes in the north, moderating to slopes of 5 percent or less south of 140th Street. The area's natural boundaries are roads, drainage basins and topographic breaks. Roads are the most useful administrative boundary in this area because they do not artificially divide legal lots, and delineate smaller areas than drainage basins or topography. -5 C. Cascade View is in the Puget Sound Council of Government's (COG) Riverton Forecast Area Zone 3820. The COG projects only a slight population increase from 29,476 in 1980 to 32,501 through the year 2000 in this zone (i.e. a 10.3% total increase over 20 years). D. All relevant public earlier. III. OBJECTIVES Military Road So. on the west, 24th Avenue So. /So. 116th Street on the north, the existing Tukwila limit (Hwy. 99) on the east, and So. 152nd Street on the south form a the most discrete area which encloses the remaining South Central School District outside the City. Encompassing the entire school district within the City is envisioned to enhance community identity and cohesiveness. -6- services have been discussed delays in the implementation of E. There are no expected public services. F. The area is now provided with police and general government services to a standard deemed acceptable by King County. Sewer, water, and fire protection are provided by special purpose districts to an urban level of service. A higher level of urban police and general government service may be required as the area develops per County zoning. There is now sufficient resident demand for city level services to initiate the current Tukwila annexation process. Alternative service providers would be the City of Seattle, or the City of Sea -Tac. The proposed annexation satisfies the following objectives of RCW 36.93.180: (1) Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities; The annexation would encompass the most discrete area which encloses the remaining South Central School District outside the City. Encompassing the entire school district with the City is envisioned to enhance community identity and cohesiveness. Tukwila zoning would also help to preserve the existing single family core by designating it for continued single family use. King County zoning designates the southern reach of this core as Potential Medium Density Multi- family. (Z) (3) ( Use of physical boundaries, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and land contours; Annexation boundaries use roads as the most logical delineating feature (see II.5.B.). Creation and preservation of logical service areas; The annexation would place almost the entire stretch of Hwy. 99, north of SR 518, in Tukwila's police jurisdiction instead of the existing shared responsibility between Tukwila and the County. This will reduce the need for service provider coordination. Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character; The proposed action would annex this urban area to an existing city. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19- OCTOBER -88 . ATTACHMENT A Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22, T23N, R4E, W.M.► which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 1/4 corner og said Section; thence North 18 28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the east margin of 24th Avenue South; thence northerly along said east margin to the south margin of South 116th Way; thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds. Volume 3860, page 462. Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING. ATTACHMENT B iirczcirrAr. -1 • V II • ' !;.1 111-Z1 II■tzatta- R-1 111■1111.:1111111. I 11111.:1 01111 CASCADE 40 VIEW LEGEND llakwila City Limits MNIIINNIMEN Sea Tic City Limits NO SCALE Proposed Cascade View Annexation OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTING ArroRNEY KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Crva DIVISION NORM MALENG PROSECUTING ATTORNEY April 27, 1989 ATTACHMENT D The City Council City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Petition for Annexation to the City of Tukwila Dear Councilmembers: On April 6, 1988 this office received a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation by the City of Tukwila of an area of unincorporated King County known as the Cascade View community. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney must certify or refuse to certify this petition for annexation. In making a decision on the issue of certification, the prosecuting attorney undertakes two separate inquiries. First, it must be determined whether the petition for annexation meets the requirements set for petitions by RCW 35A.01.040. Second, RCW 35.13.025 provides that in reviewing a petition for annexation the prosecuting attorney must determine whether the city or town in question is legally authorized to take the action requested in the petition. Based on the results of our examination of these two criteria, we have determined to certify the petition for annexation. The petition itself appears to meet the procedural and substantive requirements of RCW 35A.14.020. The King County Department of Public Works has reviewed the legal description of the area proposed for annexation, and has determined that this description is accurate as required by RCW 35A.01.040(1)(c). The King County Department of Records and Elections has informed us that a total of 1,422 registered voters reside in the Cascade View area, and that 1,280 voters cast ballots in the last state general election. The number of signatures on the petition thus appears to be adequate in that it equals at least 10% of the votes cast in the last general election within the 1 OF 4 E 550 KING COUNTY CouirniouSE 516 THUD AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHI GPON 98104 -2312 (206) 296 -9015 FAX (206) 296-0191 The City Council April 27, 1989 page two proposed annexation area as'required by RCW 35.A.01.040(4) and RCW 35A.14.020. A determination of the validity of these signatures as well as verification of the number of registered voters in the unincorporated territory proposed to be annexed should be undertaken by the Tukwila City Clerk pursuant to RCW 34A.14.020. RCW 35A.14.020 provides that an annexation petition is to call for "an election to vote upon the annexation of unincorporated territory contiguous to a code city ". (Emphasis added.) This requirement is somewhat problematic in this case, and warrants some discussion. At the time that the Cascade View annexation petitions were circulated and signed, the Cascade View community was not contiguous to Tukwila. Prior to the filing of the petitions with this office, the annexation by the City of Tukwila of Fire District No. 1 became effective, and Cascade View became linked to the City by a bridge over the Duwamish River. It is doubtful, however, that a single connection such as this renders an area contiguous for the purposes of annexation statutes. (See generally,, 49 ALR 3rd 589 and the cases cited therein.) On March 14, 1989 an election was held regarding the proposed annexation by the City of Tukwila of the Foster, Riverton, and Thorndyke areas. These annexations were approved by the voters, and on March 27, 1989 the Tukwila City Council adopted ordinances 1508, 1509, and 1510 annexing these areas to the city effective April 15, 1989. With the annexation of the Foster, Riverton,, and Thorndyke areas, Cascade View became contiguous to the City of Tukwila. Cascade View thus officially became contiguous to the City after the filing of the petitions presently under consideration,, but during the time period within which this office is required either to certify or refuse to certify these petitions. There are no Washington cases addressing the question of whether,, under RCW 35A.14.020, an annexation petition is sufficient when the territory to be annexed becomes contiguous after the petition has been filed. The requirement that a petition refer to an area that is contiguous to the city in question is obviously tied to the 2 OF 4 The City Council April 27, 1989 page three 3 OF 4 more general contiguity requirement of RCW 35A.14.010, which provides that a code city has the authority to annex only contiguous territories. The clear purpose of the contiguity requirement of RCW 35A.14.010 is to prevent the creation of "satellite" cities and of islands of unincorporated territory, and generally to foster the orderly growth and expansion of incorporated areas. Here, because the residents of Foster, Riverton, and Thorndyke had already voted in favor of annexation prior to the filing of the Cascade View petitions, and because the Cascade View area now is in fact contiguous to the city, it appears to us that the requirement of RCW 35A.14.020 that an annexation petition pertain to a contiguous area has been substantially complied with in this case. (See generally, People v. Spokane, 51 Wn. App. 1816, 755 P.2d 836 (1988), in which the Washington Court of Appeals applied the doctrine of substantial compliance to statutory annexation petition requirements, stating that "the determining consideration is whether the purpose of the statutory requirement has been fulfilled ".) Therefore, it is the opinion of this office that the petition is sufficient under RCW 35A.14.020. The second element of our inquiry, under RCW 35.13.025, is whether the City of Tukwila is legally authorized to take the action specifically requested in the petition. As you know, the City of Tukwila has an optional municipal code form of city government. Accordingly, legal authority for annexation by the City is provided in RCW 35A.14.010. Under that statute, a code city such as Tukwila has the power to annex any unincorporated territory which lies contiguous to it, except that the county must consent to the annexation of any property owned by the county and used for agricultural fair purposes. As discussed above, Cascade View is presently contiguous to the City, and so the contiguity requirement of 35A.14.010 is met. The provision in RCW 35A.14.010 regarding county property used for agricultural fairs is not an issue here, as none of the territory involved in this proposed annexation is owned by the county and used for agricultural fair purposes. Based on the foregoing analysis we hereby certify the enclosed petition for annexation pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020 The: City Council April 27, 1989 page four .Very truly yours, For ORM MA IN YERX ut Prosecu i ttorney QY /kr enclosure cc: Boundary Review Board C C , giagex4,77 and RCW 35.13.025 and return the petition for action by the Tukwila City Clerk and Council. NG, King County Prosecuting Attorney: /cs City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor cc: Mayor Tukwila City Council Planning Department City Attorney ' CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY ATTACHMENT E I, Maxine Anderson, City Clerk for the City of Tukwila, do hereby certify that the signatures on the petition for annexation of the area known as Cascade View are sufficient under the requirements of RCW 35A.14.020. King County Records and Elections has verified the signatures and determined that the number of registered voters signed the petition more than exceeds the 128 signatures required. DATED THIS 25th DAY OF MAY, 1989: G2� Ma ine Anderson, City Clerk FISCAL AND SERVICE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION MAYOR Gary L. Van Dusen CITY ADMINISTRATOR John. McFarland CITY COUNCIL Edgar D. Bauch Joe H. Duffie Mabel H. Harris Joan Hernandez Clarence Moriwaki Dennis Robertson Marilyn G. Stoknes PROJECT MANAGER Alan Doerschel, Finance Director CITY OFFICIALS Maxine Anderson, City Clerk Rick Beeler, Planning Ross Earnst, Public Works Tom Keefe, Fire Ron Waldner, Police Don Williams, Parks /Recreation CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION FISCAL AND SERVICE IMPACT ANALYSIS Addendum to Pages 8,19 and 11 Police Services PAGE 8 Estimated annual activity based on King County Police records from July, August and September 1988 indicate between 6,000 - 9,000 calls for service. Based on this estimate, the need for additional personnel would be 6 to 8 FTE's or $255,000 to $345,000 and an additional $75,000 to $125,000 for Valley -Com, jail services, and other operational and maintenance costs. The new cost estimates for Police Services are $330,000 to $470,000. PAGE 10 Table 5 update: RANGE OF OPERATING COSTS AND FULL - TIME EMPLOYEES (FTE'S) LOW NO. OF HIGH NO. OF RANGE FTE'S RANGE FTE'S Annual Total $650,000 9 $895,000 13 PAGE 11 Annual estimated operating revenues of $738,210 are now compared to an estimated range of expenditures of $650,000 to $895,000. TO: John McFarland, City Administrator FROM: Ron Waldner, Chief of Police DATE: August 8, 198 55 Assaults 15 Robbery or related activity 1 Rape 4 Indecent Exposure 1 Indecent Liberty 8 Commercial Burglary 21 Residential Burglary 30 Auto Thefts 3 Forgeries 30 Shoplifts 32 Fight Disturbance Calls *avow. ..m.a.krae Urroa MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Cascade View - Projected Police Expenditures City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Police Department 433 -1808 Based on July 1989 activity, the Tukwila Police Department projects the following annual activity for the current city: Current population: 11,000 Current commissioned officers: 48 Police calls for service (projected): 23,000/27,000 Part I crime (projected): 2,700/3,000 Annual activity within "Cascade View," based on King County Police records from July, August, and September 1988: Current population: 3,000 Calls for service (projected): 8,612 Part I crime (projected): 888 The following data was pulled from King County Police reports (from three months of 1988 data): John McFarland August 8, 1989 Page Two 43 Criminal Trespass 32 Vandalism 153 Vice Incidents 14 Narcotic Cases 133 Traffic Incidents 19 Felony warrants served 24 Misdemeanor warrants served Vt Over 8,000 calls for service for such a small population and geographical area is indicative of some serious problems. Without study data on complainant and victim background, it is impossible to determine how the activity is proportioned between the residential and transient population. It would appear, this area is impacted by a similar phenomena that exists in Tukwila - most of our police demands for service are a result of our location, retail/ndustrial impacts, traffic access, and being at the crossroads of "everything." 8,000 calls for service, under most staffing formulas, projects out to a patrol staffing level of eight to ten officers. This would most likely be a single patrol district with two person staffing a good part of the time. Conservatively, I would recommend a beginning approach of a single patrol district staffed with six personnel. This gives us manning for about 6,000 calls for service and assumes we are up to workable staffing levels in the current city. In addition, we would impact the following areas immediately: Support personnel (2) - Front office personnel needed to process the paper /activity volume. Special Operations (1) - Detective for added vice and narcotic activity. Equipment (1) additional patrol vehicle. Miscellaneous - Hiring/training expenses, overtime until additional staff is oriented, jail contracts, Valley Comm. etc. RGW:tm File: A5621 cc: Alan Doerschel, Finance Director FIGURE A. Cascade View Area Vicinity Map APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS PAGE I Introduction 3 II Revenue Impacts 5 III Cost Impacts for Annual Operations 8 IV Summary and Discussion 11 TABLES 1. Selected Cascade Characteristics 4 2: Property Tax Rate Comparison With and Without Annexation 5 3. Sales Tax Revenue 6 4. Summary of Revenue Impact 7 5. Range of Operating Costs and Full -time Employees for Cascade View 10 12 A. Population Data - Cascade View 13 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 3 SCOPE OF STUDY I. INTRODUCTION This study provides a general planning analysis of the fiscal impact of providing Tukwila service to the Cascade View annexation area. The estimated cost and service impacts on Tukwila are based on a department level review of the area characteristics, and the staffing levels that departments would request to serve the area. Also included are possible capital project requirements. Specific decisions about the staffing requirements for the annexation area will be made when the City adopts an amended budget for the annexation. The City of Tukwila has received an annexation petition from the area known as Cascade View. The Cascade area lies within parts of Census Tracts 271, 273, and 281, and in the Puget Sound Council of Government's (PSCOG) Riverton Forecast Area Zone 3820. The Cascade area is bounded by South 152nd, Pacific Highway South, Military Road, 24th Avenue, and 116th Way. King County currently provides general government, road improvements, and police service. Other public services are provided by Water Districts 20 and 125; Rainier Vista and Val Vue Sewer Districts; Fire Districts 11 and 2; and the King County Library District. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila would provide general government road improvements, police service and fire protection. The existing sewer, water, and library districts would continue to serve the area in their current roles. Tukwila does not envision assuming these special purpose district functions. A more detailed analysis of City services is provided in Section III. The City is planning to implement a Surface Water Utility in January of 1990. This study does not include costs of staffing for this new utility. BACKGROUND Table 1 summarizes some basic population data of the Cascade area. It is important to note that this area has an estimated population of 3,061 and encompasses 581 acres; that Tukwila absorbed a population increase of 6,200 on 2,700 acres between December, 1988 and April, 1989; and that the City has generally completed increasing its staff /service capability to serve these new areas at Tukwila standards. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TABLE 1 Selected Cascade Characteristics *Appendix A Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 4 CITY OF % OF CASCADE 'TUKWILA TUKWILA Population * 3,061 10,923 28 Housing * Multi- Family 1,099 2,163 51 Single Family jth2 3,422 20 Total 1,768 5,585 32 Number of Acres 581 5,143 11 Persons per Acre 5.27 2.12 250 Assessed Valuation $100,900,500 $1,670,000,000 6 Per Capita. Valuation $32,963 $152,888 22 Per Acre Valuation $173,667 $324,713 53 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 5 II. REVENUE IMPACTS The most significant sources of potential revenue to the City from the annexation area are property tax, state shared revenues and sales tax. State shared revenue and sales tax are constant and do not change whether the area is in the City or not. A City property tax of 3.010 would be a new levy upon annexation. Taxes which would be dropped upon annexation are: the Fire District tax ($1.50), the County Road tax ($1.681) and Library tax ($0.500). Property owners would thus realize a drop in tax rate from $3.681 per $1,000 assessed valuation, to $3.010 per . $1,000 assessed valua- tion. All other area taxes would remain constant. The annual impact of these different property tax rates, based on the 1989 levy rates for the area, are shown on Table 2. TABLE 2 Property Tax Rate Comparison With and Without Annexation 1989 Assessed Valuation of Cascade View Area $100,900,500 With Annexation: Tukwila Tax Rate 3.010* Tukwila Levy $303,710 King County Equivalent Rate: Fire District #11 Tax Rate 1.500 Road District Tax Rate 1.681 Rural Library Tax Rate .500 Combined Tax Rate 3.681 Combined Levy $371,415 *General Levy for Tukwila Only - 1989 During the first two years after annexation, revenue from property taxes are affected by various timing considerations. Property tax levy rates are set in one year and assessed and collected in the next year. This means that, regardless of when an annexation occurs, the property taxes for the current year would already be set and cannot be changed before the following year. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 6 Revenue from the City's general tax levy is affected by the timing of the annexation. If the annexation takes place before March 1, the City can levy property tax in the current year for collection in the following year, and there would be no revenue from the City property tax until the following year. If annexation takes place after March 1, the City cannot levy the tax until the following year, which means it is not collected until the second year after annexation, and there is no revenue collected during the first two calendar years after annexation. To some extent, this delay in collection of the City's general property taxes is made up by the provision that any Road District taxes that have been levied but not been collected as of the annexation date are distributed to the City upon collection. Also, the City would receive rev- enue from Fire District #11 in exchange for providing fire service, and would not have to pay for library service for the new citizens during this period. The retail sales and use tax is another source of revenue from the annexation area. The estimate of retail sales tax revenue, shown on Table 3, is based on a drive -by survey of the annexation area. Information on taxable sales from these businesses in 1988 was provided by the Department of Revenue. Tukwila's sales tax rate is one percent; fifteen percent of the local sales tax revenue collected within the City is allo- cated to the County. Table 3 reflects the County's share and the amount of revenue remaining for the City-- approximately $144,500 for the area. TABLE 3 Sales Tax Revenue Number of Retail Businesses 30 Retail Taxable Sales $17,000,000 Local Sales Tax Rate 1.0% Local Sales Tax Revenue $170,000 Less: County 15% ( 25,500) Tukwila Sales Tax Revenue $144,500 Other significant revenues for the area would be generated by state distributed revenues and locally imposed fees and fines. These are shown on Table 4 which includes footnotes on the method of estimating each revenue. Some of the rev- enues are restricted to specific uses. The motor vehicle fuel tax must be used for road purposes, the real estate excise tax must be used for capital projects, and emer- gency medical services (EMS) funds must be used for fire programs. Unrestricted revenues can be used for any purpose designated by the City. As shown on Table 4 the estimated annual amount of revenue that would come to the City from the annexation area is $636,210 in unrestricted sources and $102,000 from restricted sources. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 7 TABLE 4 Summary of Revenue Impact Unrestricted Revenue: Property Tax 1 $303,710 / Sales Tax 2 144,500 Business Licenses /Fees 3 5,000 ) Permits /Planning Fees 4 50,000 Motor Vehicle Excise Tax 5 42,000 `.. Liquor Excise Tax /Profits 6 36,000 Court Fees, Fines, etc. 7 40,000 -- Other Taxes, Fees, Charges 8 15,000) Unrestricted Total $636,210 Restricted Revenues: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 9 $ 75,000 Real Estate Transfer Tax 10 7,000 EMS 11 -20;000- Restricted Total $102,000 Grand Total Revenues $738,210 1. See Table No.2 2. See Table No.3 3. Based on number of businesses and percentage of misc. fees. 4. Assumes level of permitting activity equivalent to Foster / Riverton /Thorndyke. 5. Based on state formulas. 6. Based on state formulas. 7. Based on same level of activity as Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke. 8. Based on level of activity of total current city. 9. Based on state formulas. 10. Based on estimated current property turnover rate. 11. Based on current distribution from King County. 6;--1 ,GG CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 8 III. COST IMPACTS FOR ANNUAL OPERATIONS The impact of annexation on Tukwila's costs for annual operations are primarily from the additional personnel that would be needed to serve the Cascade View area. There are some one time costs for additional equipment (e.g. vehicles, desk and chairs). A range of cost estimates was developed based on information supplied by department heads as to personnel and equipment needs. Personnel costs were esti- mated using the mid -range monthly salary for the same or similar positions that currently exist in the City; benefits were estimated at 25 percent of salary costs. The estimated cost impacts are based on experience of the previous annexations. The City will review these results internally. Final decisions about staffing require- ments for the annexation area will be made when the City adopts an amended budget for the annexation. All costs are shown as a range of estimates. A range was used to reflect the uncertainty about the overlapping impacts on services with previous annexations . General: The potential cost of additional facilities is not included in the analysis because of the low. probability that this annexation by itself will require new buildings. Although there will be some resultant pressure on existing facilities. Police Services: The impacts on police service relate to both the size of the geo- graphic area, the density of the population, and the nature of criminal activity in the area. The annexation area is mainly residential, but there are some commercial areas (e.g. along Highway 99) that may attract a different type and frequency of criminal activity. The Police Department has estimated that it would need a 3 to 5 additional FTE's to handle the calls for service and projected increased activity. The total annual labor cost impact for the Police Department, ranges from $126,000 to $210,000. Additional costs for Valley -Com, jail services, and other operation and maintenance costs are estimated to range from $50,000 to $75,000. The total cost estimates for Police services are $176,000 to $285,000. The four existing Police Patrol Districts would not need to be increased to accommodate this annexation. Fire Protection Services: The annexation will not require an additional fire station. However, costs for Valley - Communications dispatch services, supplies, and other related expenses ranges from $15,000 to $30,000. Fire District #11, which currently provides service to Cascade View will turn over some of their assets in proportion to the value assumed by the City of Tukwila. The City already has a mutual aid agreement with District No. 11 for cooperative service upon request. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 9 Negotiations are currently underway to integrate fire protection over the entire plateau with automatic mutual aid agreements between Tukwila and Fire Dis- trict Nos. 11, 2, and 24. The nearest provider would be automatically called via the 911 system with this agreement. All parties anticipate having automatic mutual aid by January 1990. Municipal Court: The annexation will affect Municipal Court costs because of the additional criminal and traffic cases that must be handled by the City. The Municipal Court has estimated that additional extra labor will be needed. Other Municipal Court costs include judicial, prosecuting attorney, public defense payments and payment for the Southeast Community Alcohol Treatment Center. The estimated costs for Municipal Court range from $15,000 to $25,000. Community Development: The Planning and Building Divisions would be affected by increases in building permit applications and development review tasks generated from the annexation area. An additional 1 -2 FTE(s) may be required to service this estimated demand which is expected to be equivalent to the Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke annexations. The range of costs including labor, professional services, and ancillary costs is $60,000 - $75,000 and has been included in the estimate at Table 5. Parks and Recreation: The Parks Department estimates that the impact of annexa- tion would be relatively small, since residents in the area already use Tukwila's recreation programs. There would be some increase in costs for staffing recre- ation programs, mailing notices of classes and programs, and providing trans- portation services for senior citizens. The estimated costs for the Recreation Department, ranges from $10,000 - $15,000. Administrative: The City's various legislative and administrative functions would be affected by the overall increase in responsibilities resulting from annexation, with impacts for the City Clerk, Finance Departments and Personnel Depart- ment. Annexation would also affect the responsibilities of the Mayor and City Council, but this increase cannot be easily translated into dollar amounts. The total cost impact for the Finance Department assumes that the existing sewer and water utilities would continue to serve, and that they would not be respon- sible for any billings to sewer and water customers in the annexation area. The total cost for these functions including insurance, range from $20,000 to $30,000. Public Works: The Public Works Department would be affected by the addition of roads and facilities that would result from annexation. The Department has determined the number of road miles in the area and looked at facilities in the area. The Department has identified staffing requirements of 2 to 3 FTEs for the annexation area based on this review. In addition to staffing requirements, there would be equipment rental costs. The General Fund effort includes Administration, Engineering Services, and Facilities Maintenance. The Street Fund portion includes maintenance of new City streets. The total cost impact ranges from $100,000 to $125,000. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 10 Community . Services:. Several community service costs are budgeted in the Mayor's Office, including the costs for library and health services contract. The City pays the King County Health Department for services provided to City citizens based on a contractual agreement; the estimates for this contract are based on pop - ulation in . the annexation areas. The library contract provides for payment of $19.53 per capita and the estimates are based on this per capita amount. The City contributes to various other programs on a voluntary basis; since these programs provide direct services to individuals, it is assumed that contri- butions would be increased in proportion to the increase in population related to annexation. The total estimated cost for these community services ranges from $100,000 to $125,000. Summary of Operating Costs: Table 5 summarizes the range of costs for each de- partment. TABLE 5 Range of Operating Costs and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for Cascade View LOW NO. HIGH NO. RANGE *FTEs RANGE *FTEs Police Department $176,000 3 $285,000 5 Fire Department 15,000 - 30,000 Municipal Court 15,000 - 25,000 Community Development 60,000 1 75,000 2 Parks /Recreation 10,000 15,000 Administrative 20,000 - 30,000 - Community Services 100,000 - 125,000 Public Works:General /Street 100,000 2 125,000 Annual Total $496,000 6 $710,000 10 *Includes only regular full -time or part -time employees Capital Improvements: Based on a review of King County's capital improvement plans, and discussions with Tukwila's Public Works Department, only two capital improvement projects have been identified for the annexation area. Since sewer and water services would be provided by existing purveyors, no capital improvements for these services were identified. The annexation area has some surface water problems, however, these will become part of the total surface water program revenue and expenditure analysis. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION The only significant road project is the need for a signal at 130th and Highway 99 at an estimated cost of $200,000. Also, a paving project from 144th to Military Road for $53,000 is in the King County Capital Plan. The current City policy is for newly annexed residential streets to be improved through L.I.D.'s. Any other minor improvements that would be necessary are included in the opera- tions and maintenance costs portion of this report. IV. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 11 The annual revenues for the annexation area is estimated at $738,210 (see Table 4). Estimated annual operating costs range from $496,000 to $710,000, including Street Fund operations and maintenance costs (see Table 5). The high range of expendi- tures is virtually the same as the estimated revenues. Amounts for one -time costs are not shown in this analysis, but are expected to be nominal. There are several reasons for the apparent matching of revenues and expenditures as well as other ramifications to be examined. The impact of the Fire District #1 and Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke annexations brought two new police patrol districts as well as a new fire station close to the annexation area. The total number of positions added for these earlier annexations was 48.5 FTE's and approximately $2.5 million dollars in annual additional expendi- tures. These increases, facility space acquisition, and equipment purchases will enable the City to absorb this annexation area for the projected additional expenditures. This annexation will increase Tukwila's population to 14,000 residents which is very close to the 15,000 population threshold. At 15,000 population the City would be required to take over all traffic signals on State highways (approximately 20) at a total annual maintenance cost of $100,000. Also, there may be some incremental costs for services which cannot be determined at this time. Page �11 S 144 th St. S. 146th St. S 148th St CASCADE VIEW Riverton 4 TUKWILA 140th St 'urea Foster High Thorndyke LEGEND TUkwila City Limits =Imam Sea Tic City Limits Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 13 Appendix A Population Data Cascade View NUMBER OF OCCUPANCY AVERAGE TOTAL ur rrs 1 RATE 2 PERSON/UNIT 3 POP/ESTIMATE Multi- Family 1,099 .95 1.5 1,569 Single- Family 669 .97 2.3 1,492 TOTALS 1,768 3,061 1 Obtained from map of King County Cascade View Existing Land Use, 1987. 2 Obtained from the City Clerk's Census Data of May 31, 1989. 3 Obtained from the City Clerk's Census Data of May 31, 1989. 1 ' a CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO /// A cH. C't A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ACCEPTING A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF THE CASCADE VIEW AREA BY THE ELECTION METHOD. WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila has determined that the sig- natures on the petition are sufficient and has filed a certificate of sufficiency of the petition with the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has determined that there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, following public hearings the City will, by Ordinance, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330 and 35A.14.340, provide for zoning and land use regulations for the annexation area to become effective upon annexation, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property located within the Cascade View Annexation Area more particularly described on Exhibit A hereto, and requests that an election be held within the proposed annexation area on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila; subject, however, to the right to withdraw such approval, depending upon the final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board. Section 2. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the elec- torate of the territory to be annexed, as a ballot issue, a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is currently assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 3. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. The City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed, a proposi- tion that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, become subject to such Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations as shall hereafter be prescribed by Ordinance of the City pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.14 ;330 and 35A.14.340. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to notify each of the Petitioners signing the petition for election filed with the City of this resolution either by mail or by publication as requested by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file the . approved petition for election and a copy of . this Resolution with the King County Council, and with the King County Boundary Review Board. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASH- INGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON the 5- _ 2 day of .Cieer6litCalc 1989. APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7i1zM Office of the City AttOney FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: RESOLUTION NUMBER ' RESOLUTION Page 2 Marilyn Stol4ies, Council President ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Ma a Anderson, City Clerk CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION 19- OCTOBER -88 ATTACHMENT A Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22. T23N, R4E. W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 1/4 corner og.said Section; thence North 18'28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 88 ° 11'04" West along said easterly extension and continuing westerly . along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the east margin of 24th Avenue South; thence northerly along said east margin to the south margin of South 116th Way; thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds. Volume 3860, page 462, Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. wF,C 191 -11 -970 Proponent CITY OF TUKWILA LEGAL DESCRIPTION.) Responsible Official Position/Title Address FM.ONS A 71" rAc f� DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal ANNEX 581 ACRES & 3,061 PERSONS TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA WITH PREANNEXATION ZONING. SEWER AND WATER PURVEYORS REMAIN THE SAME (SEE ATTACHMENT A). ANNEXATION VOTE ON 2/6/89. Location of Proposal, including street address, if any GENERALLY BETWEEN MILITARY ROAD SOUTH / HIGHWAY 99/ S. 116TH STREET/ S. 152ND STREET. (SEE ATTACHMENT B FOR Lead Agency: City of Tukwila , File No. EPIC -20 -89 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [I There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by August 8, 1989 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. Rick Beeler Planning Director Phone 433 -1846 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 Signature You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by, written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. A F F I'D AV 1 T JOANNE JOHNSON hereby C1 Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit [ Management Permit (SEE ATTACHED) Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATTON File Number EPIC -20 -89 OF DISTRIBUTION declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non significance O Determination of Significance and.Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Other C1 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on TUESDAY, JULY 25, 1989 19 , V J 1 v l EPIC -14 -88 THORNDYKE ANNEXATIuN EPIC- 1 -88 RIVERTON- ANNEXATION SATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SHORELANDS DIVISION MAIL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BEATTY S'iATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MALL STOP PV -11 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 ATTN: KAREN BEATTY K CO PARKS, PLANNING & RES 1108 SMITH TOWER 506 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 ATTN: JIM TRACY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SEATTLE DIST NPSEN -PL -RP P.O. BOC C -3755 SEATTLE, WA 98124 WASHINGTON ST TRANSPORTATION OPT TSM & P /LAND DEVELOPERS 9611 S.E. 36TH STREET MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040 FIRE DISTRICT #18 4237 SOUTH 144TH SEATTLE,•WA 98168 KING CO. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD 3600 136TH PLACE S.E. BELLEVUE, WA 98006 ATTN: BRICE MARTIN FIRE DISTRICT #11 1243 S.W. 112TH SEATTLE, WA 98146 SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST #406 9690 SOUTH 144TH SEATTLE, WA 98168 KING COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 300 8TH NORTH SEATTLE, WA 98109 PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL ATTN: ENGINEER (EIS REVIEW) 300 S.W. SEVENTH STREET RENTON, WA 98055 SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPT 1015 3RD AVENUE ROOM 922 SEATTLE, WA 98104 WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS ATTN: WILLIAM FRY P.O. 1869 SEATTLE, WA 98111 VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT P.O. BOX 68063 SEATTLE, WA 98168 WASHINGTON STATE DEPT - FISHERIES WATER DISTRICT #125 115 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION BLDG P.O. BOX 68147 OLYMPIA, WA 98504 SEATTLE, WA 98168 CITY OF OINES PLANNING PT 21630 1 H SOUTH DES SINES, WA 98198 METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. ATTN: MANAGER MS 92 821 SECOND AVENUE SEATTLE, WA 98104 HIGHLI ES 207 S. 50TH P.O. B SEAT 98166 SEA -TA TU ILA CHAMBER OF C 5200 SOU CENTER BLVD SUITE TUKW A WA 98188 VALLE P.O KENT ILY NEWS 130 8135 HIGHLINE SCHOOL DIST #401 5675 AMBAUM BLVD S.W. SEATTLE, WA 98166 RAINIER VISTA SEWER DIST. 11846 DES MOINES WAY S. SEATTLE, WA 98168 TUKWILA /SEA -TAC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE P.O. BOX 58591 TUKWILA, WA 98188 E T 518 E, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project: Cascade View Annexation 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila 3. Address and phone number of applicant: Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner Tukwila Department of Community Development Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Ph. 206- 433 -1858. 4. Checklist prepared: May 24, 1989. 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development. . Proposed schedule: Annexation vote to be held on February 6, 1990. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? The City will assume responsibility for all general public services such as general administration, fire, police, roads and zoning. The sole exceptions would be sewer and water service. Existing providers would continue to serve this area. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared. This area has been evaluated in the King County Sensitive Areas map for slopes, and wetlands. The City has no plans to assume these functions at this time. Further expansions would be evaluated upon receipt of an annexation request. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals dir ectly affecting the property covered by your propos al? There are no known annexation or incorporation actions which conflict this proposal. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. No permits are necessary. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. The City of Tukwila proposes to annex the Cascade View area in response to a petition from area residents. This area encompasses approximately 5814acres and 3,061 persons. See Item A.7 and "Tukwila Fiscal and Public Service Analysis" in Attachment A. 12. Location of proposal. The annexation area is located in portions of Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 22; Township 23N; Range 4E; Seattle, Washington.. In general, Cascade View is bounded by Military Rd. /Sea -Tac City limits on the west, So. 116th St. on the north, Hwy. 99 /Tukwila City Limits on the east, and So. 152nd St. on the south. A further general description is shown in Attachment A while a legal description is shown in Attachment B. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? This area is not covered by the City's Comprehensive Plan. Environmentally sensitive areas will be established upon annexation based on pre - annexation Comprehensive Plan actions by the City Council. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site. The terrain varies from flat in the south, to rolling and steeply sloping in the north. b. What is the steepest slope on the site? The steepest slope in the area is approximately 90 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on the site? A wide range of all soil types may be found in this 581 acre area including sand, clay, silt, and some peat. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils? There is some evidence of unstable steep northern slopes. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Does not apply to this non- project action. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? Does not apply to this project. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces? Does not apply to this project. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion. Does not apply to this project. Does not apply. 3 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal? Does not apply to this project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? Not applicable to this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air. Not applicable to this project. 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site? Yes. The Cascade view annexation touches onto the Duwamish River at the extreme northern tip. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) of the described waters? No. Does not apply to this project. 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands. None. Not. applicable to this non - project action. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? No. 5. Does the proposal lie within 100 - year floodplain? This area does not lie within a 100 -year floodplain except a small portion along the Duwamieh River. 4 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste: materials to surface waters? No. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn. No. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources. None. c. Water runoff 1. Describe the source of runoff and method of collection and disposal, if any. None. Not applicable to this project. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? No. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts. No such proposals are necessary for this project. 4. Plants a. Types of vegetation found on the site: The Cascade annexation area contains a variety of grasses, shrubs, and trees. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered. No changes will be made to the vegetation as a result of this annexation. 5 c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known endangered species of vegetation in Cascade view. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures. None. 5. Animals a. Types of birds located near or on the site. A full range.of urban, year -round and seasonal birds can be expected to be found in the Cascade,View area. • b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no known threatened or endangered species known to reside in the area. Such evaluation will be made as land is developed. c. Is the site part of a migration route? This area, as well as most of western Washington, is part of the Pacific Flyway migratory bird route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife. No measures have been proposed. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Does not apply to this project. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy byadjacent.properties? No. Does not apply to this project. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? None. Not applicable to this proposal. 6 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards. There are no environmental hazards related to this project. b. Describe special emergency services that might be required. No emergency services are required for this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards. No proposals are necessary for this project. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project? None. Not applicable to this project. 2. What types and levels of noise would be created or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis? No noise would be created with this project. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts. Not necessary for this project. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of residential, . commercial, and light industrial uses located within the 581 acre Cascade View annexation area. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? This area has not been used for agriculture except for possible historic, scattered small farms and grazing throughout the area. 7 c. Describe any structures on the site. Cascade has a mix of single family, multi- family, and commercial buildings. Maximum building height is approximately 7 stories, with the majority being one to three story structures. d. Will any structures be demolished? No. Does not apply to this project. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The following King County zoning classifications are found in the Cascade View area: RS- Single family residential RD3600 -Low density multifamily RM2400- Medium density RM1800 -High density RM900- Maximum density CG- General Commercial BC- Community Business BN- Neighborhood Business f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? The following King County Comprehensive Plan designations are found in the Cascade area: SF- Single Family residential LD -Low density multi - family HP -High density multifamily RR- Residential /Retail -mixed use multi - family and retail. NB- Neighborhood and community OF- Office HC- Highway oriented business PR -Park and recreation CF- Community facility g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable to this project. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? King County has designated steeply sloping areas as environmentally sensitive. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Not applicable to this project. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts. None necessary for this project. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans. Pre- annexation Comprehensive Plan and zoning designations will be established prior to the annexation vote. These designations will reflect a balance between existing uses and community goals. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided. None. Not applicable to this Approximately how many units, be eliminated? None. b. project. if any, would c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None are necessary for this project. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure? No structures are proposed. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. Does not apply to this project. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts._ None. 11. Light and Glare. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? None. Not applicable to this project. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts. None. 12. Recreation a. . What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? This area contains a playing field at Cascade View Elementary School. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? No displacement would occur: 10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation. Not necessary for this project. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? Military Road is a historic landmark that lies within the Cascade View annexation area. This road was built in 1854 for the specific purposes of aiding the soldiers mobility during times of war. Presently, Military Road begins at the north bank of the Puyallup River and fades into Des Moines Way at 113th Avenue. The Robert Thomasson residence located at 2434 South. 116th Way was built in 1934. This two story structure exhibits Italian Renaissance styling with multi - colored sandstone and granite blocks. The Duwamish 99 Bridge was built in 1927 and is located on SR 99 over the Duwamish River. The bridge is constructed of steel and contains four lanes and is 200 feet long. The L. Mayer Residence located at 15025 Military Road is a two story structure that exhibits Tudor styling with a steeply pitched gable roof. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. See Item "a" above. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts. No measures are necessary for this non - project action. 1 1 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site. The major public streets within this area are Pacific Highway, East Marginal Way, Military Road, 24th Avenue, and 116th Street. These streets are shown in the Cascade map in Attachment A. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? Cascade view. is served by public transit on • Pacific Highway, Military Road and 24th Avenue. c. How many- parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? None. None. Not applicable to this project. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets. No new facilities would be required as a result of this annexation. e. Will the project use water, rail, or air transportation? ,No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? None. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation. No measures have been proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services? This area would not require increased public services as a result of annexation. Proposed' measures to reduce or control. direct impacts on public services. No proposed measures are necessary. 16. Utilities a. Utilities available on Electric, natural gas, collection, telephone, services are available area the sites water, solid waste and sanitary sewer in the Cascade. View b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. No utilities are required for this non project annexation. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date submitted: SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? No impacts would result from the proposed annexation. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases. No proposed measures are necessary. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants and animals? This proposal will not affect plants or animals. a. Proposed measures to protect plants and animals. No proposed measures are necessary. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? This proposal will not affect energy or natural resources. a. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources. Not necessary for this project. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated for governmental protection. Tukwila ordinances would replace King County ordinances in regulating the use of such areas. a. Proposed measures to protect such resources. The City of Tukwila regu_ates such areas using SEPA, project design review, and a variety of other engineering standards. The staff is also developing a sensitive areas ordinance for presentation to the City Council this year. 14 5. How would the proposal be likely .. to affect land and shoreline use? See Item No. 4. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts. Tukwila shoreline regulations would replace King County regulations. b. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? The Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan must be amended upon annexation. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No increase in public services is expected as a result of annexation. a. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demands. No such proposals are necessary. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. There are no governmental conflicts in protection of the environment as a result of annexation. 8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? There are no conflicts with Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan since it is outside of the plan area. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflicts. Not necessary for this project. 15 SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR PROJECT AND NONPROJECT PROPOSALS 1. What are the objectives of the proposal? To annex the Cascade View area to the City of Tukwila should the voters elect to do so; after having an opportunity to review Tukwila services, and zoning. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? There are no alternative means of accomplishing this annexation by voter election. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: See Item No. 2 above. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? No. a. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflicts. No proposals are necessary to reduce conflicts. FISCAL AND SERVICE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION ATTACHMENT A MAYOR Gary L. Van Dusen CITY ADMINISTRATOR John McFarland QTY COUNCIL Edgar D. Bauch Joe H. Duffie Mabel H. Hams Joan Hernandez Clarence Moriwaki Dennis Robertson Marilyn G. Stoknes PROJECT MANAGER Alan Doerschel, Finance Director CITY OFFICIALS Maxine Anderson, City Clerk Rick Beeler, Planning Ross Earnst, Public Works Tom Keefe, Fire Ron Waldner, Police Don Williams, Parks /Recreation O F T U K W ILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila,. Washington 98188 12061433 =1800 FIGURE A. Cascade View Area Vicinity Map APPENDDC TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS I Introduction II Revenue Impacts III Cost Impacts for Annual Operations IV Summary and Discussion PAGE 3 5 8 11 TABLES 1. Selected Cascade Characteristics 2. Property Tax Rate Comparison With and Without Annexation 3. Sales Tax Revenue 4. Summary of Revenue Impact 5. Range of Operating Costs and Full-time Employees for Cascade View 10 5 6 7 12 A. Population Data — Cascade View 13 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 4 Population * Housing * Multi- Family Single Family Total *Appendix A TABLE 1 Selected Cascade. Characteristics CASCADE 3,061 1,099 1,768 CITY OF % OF T U1CWI A TUKWILA 10,923 28 2,163 51 1422 20 5,585 32 Number of Acres 581 5,143 11 Persons per Acre 5.27 2.12 250 Assessed Valuation $100,900,500 $1,670,000,000 6 Per Capita Valuation $32,963 $152,888 22 Per Acre Valuation $173,667 $324,713 53 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 6 Revenue from the City's general tax levy is affected by the timing of the annexation. If the annexation takes place before March 1, the City can levy property tax in the current year for collection in the following year, and there would be no revenue from the City property tax until the following year. If annexation takes place after March 1, the City cannot levy the tax until the following year, which means it is not collected until the second year after annexation, and there is no revenue collected during the first two calendar years after annexation. To some extent, this delay in collection of the City's general property taxes is made up by the provision that any Road District taxes that have been levied but not been collected as of the annexation date are distributed to the City upon collection. Also, the City would receive rev - enue from Fire District #11 in exchange for providing fire service, and would not have to pay for library service for the new citizens during this period. The retail sales and use tax is another source of revenue from the annexation area. The estimate of retail sales tax revenue, shown on Table 3, is based on a drive -by survey of the annexation area. Information on taxable sales from these businesses in 1988 was provided by the Department of Revenue. Tukwila's sales tax rate is one percent; fifteen percent of the local sales tax revenue collected within the City is allo- cated to the County. Table 3 reflects the County's share and the amount of revenue remaining for the City—approximately $144,500 for the area. TABLE 3 Sales Tax Revenue Number of Retail Businesses 30 Retail Taxable Sales $17,000,000 Local Sales Tax Rate 1.0% Local Sales Tax Revenue $170,000 Less: County 15% ( 25500) Tukwila Sales Tax Revenue $144,500 Other significant revenues for the area would be generated by state distributed revenues and locally imposed fees and fines. These are shown on Table 4 which includes footnotes on the method of estimating each revenue. Some of the rev- enues are restricted to specific uses. The motor vehicle fuel tax must be used for road purposes, the real estate excise tax must be used for capital projects, and emer- gency medical services (EMS) funds must be used for fire programs. Unrestricted revenues can be used for any purpose designated by the City. As shown on Table 4 the estimated annual amount of revenue that would come to the City from the annexation area is $636,210 in unrestricted sources and $102,000 from restricted sources. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 8 III. COST IMPACTS FOR ANNUAL OPERATIONS The impact of annexation on Tukwila's costs for annual operations are primarily from the additional personnel that would be needed to serve the Cascade View area. There are some one time costs for additional equipment (e.g. vehicles, desk and chairs). A range of cost estimates was developed based on information supplied by department heads as to personnel and equipment needs. Personnel costs were esti- mated using the mid -range monthly salary for the same or similar positions that currently exist in the City; benefits were estimated at 25 percent of salary costs. The estimated cost impacts are based on experience of the previous annexations. The City will review these results internally. Final decisions about staffing require- ments for the annexation area will be made when the City adopts an amended budget for the annexation. All costs are shown as a range of estimates. A range was used to reflect the uncertainty about the overlapping impacts on services with previous annexations . General: The potential cost of additional facilities is not included in the analysis because of the low probability that this annexation by itself will require new buildings. Although there will be some resultant pressure on existing facilities. Police Services: The impacts on police service relate to both the size of the geo- graphic area, the density of the population, and the nature of criminal activity in the area. The annexation area is mainly residential, but there are some commercial areas (e.g. along Highway 99) that may attract a different type and frequency of criminal activity. The Police Department has estimated that it would need a 3 to 5 additional FTE's to handle the calls for service and projected increased activity. The total annual labor cost impact for the Police Department, ranges from $126,000 to $210,000. Additional costs for Valley -Com, jail services, and other operation and maintenance costs are estimated to range from $50,000 to $75,000. The total cost estimates for Police services are $176,000 to $285,000. The four existing Police Patrol Districts would not need to be increased to accommodate this annexation. Fire Protection Services: The annexation will not require an additional fire station. However, costs for Valley- Communications dispatch services, supplies, and other related expenses ranges from $15,000 to $30,000. Fire District #11, which currently provides service to Cascade View will turn over some of their assets in proportion to the value assumed by the City of Tukwila. The City already has a mutual aid agreement with District No. 11 for cooperative service upon request. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 10 Community Services: Several community service costs are budgeted in the Mayor's Office, including the costs for library and health services contract. The City pays the King County Health Department for services provided to City citizens based on a contractual agreement; the estimates for this contract are based on pop- ulation in the annexation areas. The library contract provides for payment of $19.53 per capita and the estimates are based on this per capita amount. The City contributes to various other programs on a voluntary basis; since these programs provide direct services to individuals, it is assumed that contri- butions would be increased in proportion to the increase in population related to annexation. The total estimated cost for these community services ranges from $100,000 to $125,000. Summary of Operating Costs: Table 5 summarizes the range of costs for each de- partment. TABLE 5 Range of Operating Costs and Full -Time Employees (FTEs) for Cascade View LOW NO. HIGH NO. RANGE *FM RANGE `Fr Police Department $176,000 3 $285,000 5 Fire Department 15,000 - 30,000 Municipal Court 15,000 - 25,000 - Community Development 60,000 1 75,000 2 Parks /Recreation 10,000 - 15,000 Administrative 20,000 - 30,000 - Community Services 100,000 - 125,000 - Public Works:General /Street 100.000 2 125.000 1 • IS Annual Total $496,000 6 $710,000 10 *Includes only regular full -time or part -time employees Capital Improvements: Based on a review of King County's capital improvement plans, and discussions with Tukwila's Public Works Department, only two capital improvement projects have been identified for the annexation area. Since sewer and water services would be provided by existing purveyors, no capital improvements for these services were identified. The annexation area has some surface water problems, however, these will become part of the total surface water program revenue and expenditure analysis. Riverton TUKWILA Foster 140th St Thorndyke 0 -- LEGEND 1Ukwila City Limits mimosa Sea Tic City Limits 1 -5 Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE l CASCADE VIEW 19- OCTOBER -88 ATTACHMENT B Commencing at a point on the south line of the northwest quarter of Section 22. T23N, R4E, W.M., which lies 957.2 feet east of the west 1/4 corner og said Section; thence North 18"28'40" East along the centerline of Pacific Highway South 20.88 feet to an intersection with the easterly extension of the north margin of South 152nd Street, said intersection being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence . North 88 West along said easterly extension and continuing westerlyy along said north margin to the east margin of Military Road South; thence northwesterly along said east margin to the east margin of 24th Avenue South; thence northerly along said east margin to the south margin of South 116th Way; thence east along said south margin to the west margin of Pacific Highway South (State Rd. No.1); thence northerly along said west margin to the thread of the Duwamish River; thence easterly along said thread to the northerly extension of the new easterly Right -of -Way line for Pacific Highway South as shown under Deeds, Volume 3860, page 462. Records of King County, WA; thence southerly along said northerly extension and continuing southerly along the east margin of Pacific Highway South to the north line of South 152nd Street; thence westerly along said north margin and the westerly extension thereof to the. TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ,11. NATIONA AIRPOn 10.011 n.- !so Riv 1 r 011 1 OOyi 5 110 51 3 � . , Io, 5 ro• Irnde, o 51 5 111 PI In way CASCADE VIEW LEGEND 1at111•1•1111•11011 EXISTING TUKWILA 5 A 0 , , 5 1 CITY LIMITS CASCADE VIEW WATER DISTRICT BOUNDARY 10w03 I'a SoutIicenler a! a., 1101" e 1111141 1 L 41001 (0.. ATTACHMENT OrIIIii I 11,111 1111 I I I !1111 5 110 5T ■ ▪ _ V. -y1, J • WW N 3ur11p,1 51 133 51 0■110114 C014 4 N COUNIa N CEO P OEINO \ t IELD • �� VINO \ COUNTY + \, .!N NATIONA AIRPOR' now Lake 5 111 SCI,' � 111 5 v:: lr EXIT f L. I l,r {1 ' S Leo 1 51 CASCADE VIEW LEGEND 5—t — 1 NW 1 .I SEWER DISTRICT EXISTING TUKWILA CITY LIMITS SEWER DISTRICT BOUNDARY 'CASCADE VIEW AREAS NOT IN- CLUDED IN SEWER DISTRICTS 114 01 — �. OI NI • / 1..1111•. j r,1a • ^ 1 ' Tukwila _ I � - In4,1.1 �� 1 � ,,,,,„c,,,, 1a. r. lukwll, •al way .--"r S N SouthCen. .k 1131. a 1, Way Euli 15 � It nth" LIN 1115 •I, 11, 11•. 1,001 CO" ATTACHMENT - J. I SO frJ�`IS, to ' Il '51 If (1711.:1 :1!; r' L'; Ig .:.. ;:. - L1 • ner„ it 14 �; Nn 'i•1 ui!a [i' I , : , .n•,� °',. 11 ' ,. 1 1, 1 I I • . , , rr . 1 ::. ' - J 1,1. ..1. .... t, 1 I .._ P. OUWAMISII RIVER LE MUNICIPA .1.1117111111 11111111111111 1' �IIIit�i!iuiIi =I fi:, fl 1 ft 'rn7i.. • l •ij 11151 n 1e 1 ∎ •• :.? � � < r 4' \ (4 41 , : �.t 1.1 : 11 J ' N . • c :l it � ' ' 'l'.;.', ,, -a li l%OI l i , , • ) :h ,c!,5 'n y{ r ti 1",...-7(" 4 . ca 1! iU... 7 Gp,rn Gl t �' [70 0 1 'A' .c '� •• 1 ?I ,l 'T n . ,*, n I s-.. 7 1 nn'i,. O.t nln . !I1I • r7 ° }' . , A :e ••• V %. 1 . ' + J. , <J ^ . I !',;111 4A :4; , li •V .:.I• - % �t i 7 . ( y J 1 n ' I t t o 1 l;1 EJ ;;1 iii r a 141' `!',1 i'1 ! I I • -n '�' L.l • ; 1 11 1 ?:: - u n ' j C'� ..., .' I� llw ' , l II I; o t.11' \• ; C IE :.a m *' .,..i1 ,[S, i,i, \1 • . 71 ,,,' 1 I .., 11 l t :: 4. '.•r 9 ,..._I.,, OI 4 j17 ' u 1` f 1 1 1 1 1 11 s 1':r V:: t: (LS , 1 f)1 : g : : a i1 „a , • p 1.x t. '1' s l (le ■ ,.6 ,, `(t)t.' \ \ 4�1'��`T }` • �Q u . ,el' J , I i i ' s • �' i ' 1 , • . ' —aq. . i n \ -i4i r;;lp - ( r ,- 43, : :. o s. o.h 11 1..1 � -f" '.V "1 , !! ,. ., . Q A - fl +/ • ,N..q: • 1 , H 1 L ,. 11 ��, "1 • y. Q Ir• ^l y lO �, P ' II , F 1 • I ' 1 (71'. C 1 • ,' • ' ;:1• 1 . 11 1 'IPA,' p .. l r ! V t I.1 \' IS �• t1�,�{ _ 4 S R; : • 1, I I, •1(4 �i }1 • c: �'-11 •-'� , J 1 1 1 l 1 144 j i b �1 , f „ � i' c , ' 1 . 1 ,, "+ J, ..I i , `s h .11;:';i1,? ' l .1'q ' 1 i . f' 1 . 4 - , , •1 I I 0 14 G. 7 1 _. ° I ll I' xu� ' aln Ll l\' Kl L•.,_.4 fl` 4 - „a {u 11.,`4 4 11neb { L 1 I � ,'L n l' KI� i 3 f7 ,� �. 1 ,o i t C ^J'i1c \ 1 • .�l�l. 1 I ,`? !, l. ,! I - t _ � (rrt• �.' J l „� { f � f '} ' 1. ( ., , a .. 1, \! .1.'d l I ' '' 1 ! l t; .11 T j t � R 0'' I ■ 11 II 4: • �r t..!';:i �.1' Ic +'15 �rb ��� El �:t4' ...PA!. ,bll "'., S} I , v� 3/41 ). liii;';;Ii V ' 11/1 d ,?, II 1 i i ' }7 11 Y !KNOX$ ��, 'G4i1.,I ; {i !1 ii , el. ,� '' c ' �'db I, 7 ZI I r^ .It R: th 14 ' h•I' S YE ARE ! i,�5 ii, Cci� ;.' « tti �� I ■J ;!inn? 3: , [. a (I t. . II.. P 1 J] (d :.;i:".60, � I p � p b _� F ,pr F :1. •1 :, ?„ a) . 1• ]I {] G s ' ' I � : l ti U "J 1 A:i 'a ,, t''' • trr .C�• ii.t..1 .14' .? Iii IJ� „1 J lt 1 (II . f i 1;' 1 ' a ICU( ... :.; Siu wa! C f { f 1, - � K. • _ mot}) 1 r , l r ! 7 0 1 •, J L�c � d 't !I.' it '' 7;1 177}011 0 ' 7; 17 I �1:.I! I 1.1,,,;,6,,lit.1.;..iiirlf.diel....1.r...4;:: ( I n A 1, .. ' d:;. . . 417!1 Iln q11 I F - fi' .1 „;:,jJ({(�; ': 7 1 ..,.. • • : ';' ti ;I', ! ii� . 1 1,. ' ''' , ci�,• t� AT '' A �1 K ; hu� \ , 3 ATER „; : . TION MAP CASCADE VIEW LEGEND III AREA-. BOUNDARIES -- WATER MAIN ._ 11 =1 SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO THE ENTIRE AREA. INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION LINES ARE NOT SHOWN. DETAILED SERVICE LINE MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL. .• r14A E k':WATER -I>~b EWA ITY OF SEATTLE ! t� ,t t ri '' - r;; r �,jl' r nil•; {,q' ^% MN= NM I. t3 'i i a, 1 p.,'_.a n • v., t! !'s d,'• t 1. 1 - 0 6 1.,, ; '. 4. tL1 ° - ti :le::tp .. ; Q t,i,s 1 s I: I l ;o WI '1 I 1 It1 Li - ,ME RO RENTO'.' E - - TRE3 1'•MENT'°PLA�I \ — - L ____... • '' i 1t t ▪ _ NO t• .007 ht• fr . I � . t z' l E K l,iix•s �I�. t ' ° -. P Ir jo 1 i� F CRC " =t • { I1, J ZI { ?(vr i i Nr,) • agtdt • ^ {• it o • a p t , � h' s "f, L TTA i T TION MAP . ! • 11.1 4 CASCADE VIEW LEGEND SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES - -• SEWER MAIN SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES ARE AVAILABLE TO THE ENTIRE AREA. INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION LINES ARE NOT SHOWN. DETAILED SERVICE LINE "' MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL. I I I t , 1 r9 01° i•. 6 - MAIN f tiii 'dt + _. tl h m I t • _ t ern If ;� - .n _. .,�� ¢l l'• ° o• R I fiI[. 1 '., (1 , IO , Q L I 1� \ 'T`�t &' •.1) i i7.", a :;';;4:11;1,7 _ � I[• +`� 1 { , y a i � b . ,,(:•;ai in;., ,.!!' .0 4, cJ 1� �h a `3 -l:1n b'. • + N•.,.1 .. ^ F�• i s \ ,�tl.. .. .• I I • -.L "�:. }. +i 9,!. roe •• ... q '. f ';. , , .�4'. t.,.. „.. 9r _ �/ ILti ii .:� �� O�umC tlt n 7 _ jI ._ G11 � • _,n / t,! a 1 t • • . ,., t< . ,t..i i:: at,ifu. -4 .Lyl1.rp..pn.ot.. -- ; G 1 fort .. ;7 a.. ( I � 1��1� tt '•t . .i •:„.,,---;,1,,.....]:, l t s i •r fi : ., , ty �u i .�l . .. , : f r .Q:�'U u c ,:r, .,. tl + ; .l { 4 i+' P U' '. I v ! I'��tif)at• t3 1 7- ” '1r, S1 Ilr- n r.^ ;:tu- I , J r ,, , i I i A NN .',' r_SI• �— 0 ; 7il V ^ n f , o 'ii : 1%1 U fl l. t : � 1 1 G i ,,,, — , . i , : 1 .1' }7' 'j ``�� }y • � r`" :� ;r - j r j. �� Uu' 1.�;� rte. / i'''.-1.....-1.1.09". �1 r i1C\ l� ' ,1;11 � 1. � 'I l i, ^ . 1 r , �Q 1 1 �. m J• 0.:' . • '! Y ; 'Q:• +• .^! 1 11i 1 � �V' iI i - 11 ' 1: 1 1 . :)15(' ( - i� J s @L.; / �_U o e{a Jyif!.� 1 / .j 1 fli•Eipl� ill 4'. • 1. L..L +_� ,• �, _ L , Ltf=.!A , , ,,, 2 '' lI:frilj. ':jr'iI- � Jj csfn 5`�i'� i' .. :.7 l S ✓ } ., tnncis 0 I f.{ ; a, 1 �°' if ;�r ° � 'i ' ! Juaiw ttPs4 I ? n It `^ .Q' 1 t. .:lt: .� , . 5 u i J,.,, `e l a t t i t e 6r •+ � • 6 ! Y �° { . . F I , . " � !f13•, ff,^,' Z i� ` � f", ► �: ;till.- � � �' 1 � ' .111 L }? 1NlT+ 0 A v, wjt . J ,,bLfl;r? ti Uata c ' I 6 b t I !t 1 ?" .. f ,' a x 9 ' . . r ' :+ ..t •. • o� ai ' :::, . in • �•'m f _ �•.._..., it , �I �;.. _ � yy � 7 r i4� �1;��.'�• O . • 'f l� �i'1I.� ;c ., ; �•. • �� l'1 I 1 � 1• � > ` ' i '� 1 � r ,,c•;.C Y' 5 110 51 5 r141 I i 11//0 l 1 0 V 1 • 4 10.. 9.•+ tr 11.•.1,1.01... /011(A row11 So Ulccu 5 0 Sil VIVA /' 71 NATIONA AmPof• HMV Lo Ole Stnlo 5 5 CID .11 CASCADE VIEW ....�.�... EXISTING TUKWILA CITY LIMITS SCHOOL DISTRICTS 5 03 01 no rr 0 tale t 4 rt.....1 ATTACHMENT ...1M �.�...... EXISTING TUKWILA CITY LIMITS FIRE DISTRICT BOUNDARY CASCADE VIEW I.! IL.0." tl n mrel too 1 ATTACHMENT 'N 1 31 3 ,10 non r. • Bow joke 1 i 14. 5 160 ST ertol 130 S rin EA ALI (IA nIIA J1Mialy 01 4 , ©IV 1 0400 1. AAINI(A 601F a H COWNI It v ,N CIWl VERTO CEMET COUNTY N• • • NATIONA AIRPOR I I keel rg I1ts z Rainier Rath :.• 5 m, SI Ra nter Way E %IT 153 CASCADE VIEW '- a -'-'- ANNEXATION BOUNDARY EXIT 154 Sou(1icenler 1 'a way FACILITIES CASCADE VIEW (1,Ly NI J I TTACHMENT 0 5 ' kYWA V ti q5 al WIMP —( E Ian 5 U] SI I laummrui _� 111^ MAY 11.1.7.2 COMP PLAN MID APT s lustST • 31AP PLAN NIGH DENSITY EEIDENTIAL • R.4 • R2 . WaL. '. • COO PLAN COMMERCIAL 1.1 4.7% 1,I 71'iti. . • TI..n i.i . J.J S.� . yJ 1 • ';.I .;.ri .1.1 •`. • e • 1. . • ft' A'rrAcwMcNr P PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION R -1 -7.2 Single Family Residential 6 /acre R -2 • Duplex Residential 11 /acre R -3 3 and 4 Townhouses 15 /acre R -4 Low Density Apartments 22/acre RMH High Density Apartments 30 /acre P-0 Office /R -2 C -1 Community Retail C -2 Regional Retail C -M Industrial Park CITY COUNCIL WILL MAKE FINAL DECISION ON OCTOBER 16TH 1989 • h •1 A LARGER DETAILED MAP IS AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL FOR REVIEW. CONTACT VERNON UMETSU 433 -1858 MAN C•2 • • as iso�s sv, • J a roust t • ' • 8128/87 FROM . ,. DATE SUBJECT **ILA 19 City . of : Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 12011) 433-1800 Gary L Vanousen, Mayor • ME.MORAND,UM City Council Mayor VanDusen August 25,'1989 Impacts of Cascade View., Annexation We now have six months experience with the recent annexations. This experience provides a context for our consideration of annexing the Cascade View area We have learned a lot about the new areas, enough to know that we still have much more to learn. I want the Council to be aware of what we now know and what we now see on the horizon, which must be considered in the decision to annex or not to annex Cascade View. Without exception every department feels that more staff is needed to serve the new enlarged city at a level of service closer to what was enjoyed in "Old Tukwila. I have resisted . those requests because I'm either not convinced of the need or I'm concerned about the reality of a budget deficit in 1990. Assuming current revenue policies and the existing base budget requirements, we are facing a budget deficit in 1990, unless a very conservative no -new- initiative budget is adopted. Over the past six months we have learned that we underestimated the costs of serving the newly annexed areas. Police, engineering;; fire and planning costs were more than estimated, either for direct service or indirectly upon ongoing programs. Existing and recently added staff have concentrated almost entirely upon serving and incorporating the annexations into the City. This reduced their ability to focus on the backlog of policy issues and long range planning. It will take a few years to catch up and stabilize the level of service in Tukwila to where staff can be as responsive to dtizen and Council requests as we would all like. I expect then to reach only a level that is still: lower than that of "Old Tukwila ". Cascade View could produce a shortfall . of $157,000 in revenue from that area, based upon what little we know of the area. The attached updated analysis of crime statistics indicates police costs will be greater than anticipated. This will significantly increase our jail costs and /or solidify the need for our participation in construction of a south King. County jail. Another impact may be the construction of a new city hall, instead of continuing to pay the $687,000 costs to lease space next door for five years: The bottom line is that these are only the costs we know about and, based upon our experience with existing annexations, more costs are probable. MEMORANDUM to: City Council Now we are for the first time in • the City's history since construction . of Southcenter Mall entering into a budget deficit which will very likely be the status quo for several years or a long time. Adding Cascade View, at this time, will increase that deficit and diminish our ability to serve existing Tukwila, unless our revenue policies and base budget are changed. I'm not recommending that we change our policies. I do anticipate the base budget growing because the level of service to existing Tukwila must increase to close to what we were used to in "Old Tukwila ". That will require additional revenue. Alan Doerschel is looking for any new revenue he can find, but he has run out of rocks to look under. We do not anticipate any new significant sources of revenue to offset the increase in costs of running the city, outside of Business and Occupation Tax, reallocating the 1/2 cent tax for capital or Utility Tax. Until now the Road Improvement Fund has been a savings account which we tap for budget overruns and /or unanticipated costs of new projects /programs. The needed road improvements and CIP projects relative to the newly annexed areas and our participation in the Valley Transportation Benefit District will quickly exceed the amount of the Fund. Developer mitigation payments will only pay for a small percentage of the'costs of the needed improvements: The City's share will be significant and quickly force us into very likely floating bonds: Because of the above I'm very concerned about plunging into the decision whether or not to annex Cascade View without very carefully evaluating the present and future costs and impacts. This decision must be very carefully considered. We still don't know the eventual costs of the existing annexations, much less the real costs, additive or exponential, of another increase to Tukwila. In dosing, I want to emphasize that the foregoing comments represent a fiscal analysis.:; There are a number of positive aspects related to the annexation of Cascade View. It: is critical that we consider both the positives and negatives before an commitment is made that will impact the entire community. August' 24, ±1989 Page 2, .✓.srfv�s XY <4.114173:101.iexswvRww4Valta cw.Kn..w..+�....� Sincerely, City �t Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1.. VanDusen, Mayor August 1, 1989 David Livermore 13212 31st Avenue So. Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Cascade Task Force Member List. Dear Dave, Thank you very much for volunteering to act as spokesperson and coordinator for the Task Force presentation before the Planning Commission and City Council. I am enclosing a list of Task Force members and a sheet of suggestions for making presentations before decision making boards. Please feel free to contact meat 433 -1858 if I can be of any help. Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner cc: Task Force Members, file. v i, WENDY BULL (j Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting 0 0 . 0 0 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit SEE ATTACHED MATRIX; MAYOR A FF IDAVIT Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION File Number, 89-3 -R Zoning 89 -2 -CPA Comp. Plan hereby declare that: OF OISTF()BUTION 0 Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action Q Official Notice 0 Other 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Monday, July 31, 1989. Signatur, , 19 . 6f$s 1atkir "fSF+I`YixI :Yireemi Q Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet AFF *DAVIT OF DISTRI'IUTION hereby declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Oetermination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice Q Notice of Application for Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit [] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on File Number CCU -� f()/t o Name of Project ette.-4:-.fitufl TeJ- 1 GQ.Po / - �I , 19 . August 1, 1989 David Livermore 13212 31st Avenue So. Seattle, WA 98168 RE: Cascade Task Force Member List. Dear Dave, Thank you very much for volunteering to act as spokesperson and coordinator for the Task Force presentation before the Planning Commission and City Council. I am enclosing a list of Task Force members and a sheet of suggestions for making presentations before decision making boards. Please feel free to contact me at 433 -1858 if I can be of any help. Sincerely, City . of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433.1800 Gary k. VanDusen, Mayor Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner cc: Task Force Members, file. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen; Mayor NOTICE FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING NO. 2 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA SO. 144TH ST AND 42ND AVE SO AGENDA 1 DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC SERVICES TO CASCADE VIEW. 2. DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY TASK FORCE ZONING 'RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. INFORMAL MEETINGS WITH. TUKWILA STAFF AND ELECTED OFFICIALS. JULY 19; 1989 T -9 PM This is a follow -up information brochure to share the City's findings on providing services, revenues, and preliminary zoning since the May public information meeting. 1 PUBLIC SERVICES Fire Protection Fire service would continue to be summoned through "911 ". Primary fire protection would be provided by the Tukwila Fire Department through the Allentown Station and the Foster Fire Station. Mutual aid assistance from Fire Districts No. 11 and 2 would be provided under an existing agreement. An automatic mutual aid agreement over the entire Sea - Tac plateau is currently being negotiated between Fire Districts 11, 2, 24, 26 and the City of Tukwila to allow the closest unit to respond to a call, regardless of district boundaries. A decision between the providers is anticipated prior to 1990 before the annexation vote. Police INTRODUCTION Police services would continue to be summoned by dialing "911 ". Tukwila Police Department programs include crime prevention, drug education, and in -depth investigation units; as well as uniformed patrol units. Joint operations with the region's law enforcement agencies will continue. Response time is anticipated to reflect Tukwila averages. This is generally 3 minutes for emergency calls and 7 -8 minutes for non - emergency calls. Public Works An initial Public Works Department analysis shows capital projects that should be scheduled are a traffic signal at So. 130th and Hwy. 99, paving So. 144th, possible pedestrian improvements around Cascade Elementary School, and an unspecified amount of storm drainage improvements to be funded by a new City utility tax. There are also and storm drain along Military now in the City These improveme jointly planned Sewer and Water Sewer and Water continue to be existing distri include but not new line instal maintenance, an General Cove Tukwila will pr government sery City Hall, 10 m Cascade View. King County 01str10 5 1 Representative for 1911.000 1 County Esecutrve lot 1,413,900 Representation The City is lim to seven Counci serve four year Council members the whole city, district. Thus would provide t representation as they do for Tukwila Hill ne • Annexation appr would make Casc residents eligi three City Coun Mayor's positio Earlier opportu participation i government are the many citize the Planning Co Commission, Lib Board of Adjus appoints and th confirms these destrian safety‘ ge problems d. So., which is of Sea-lac. ts would be Service Service will rovided by the ts. This will be limited to ation, billing. nt vide all general ces through its nutes from City of 11fk1"W With Cascade view Council Positrons al Large 7 Representattves lot 14.000 1 Mayor or 14,000 ted by State law members who terms. City are elected by not by any one council members e same level of or Cascade View he Riverton or ghborhoods. val in 1990 de View le to run for it seats or the in 1991. ities for direct Tukwila's vailable through boards such as ission, Arts ary Board, and ent. The Mayor City Council ppointments. Annexation Property Tax Impacts Property taxes now paid by owners in Cascade View will be reduced upon annexation to Tukwila. Three separate taxes now paid would be incorporated within a lower Tukwila city tax as shown below: Fire Library Co. Road Tukwila TOTAL TAX Tax Rate /$1,000 County Tukwila $1.50 0.53 1.72 N .A. $3.75 This tax rate difference results in a $58 tax reduction on a $100,000 single family home at this time. Lowering taxes while providing higher service levels is possible because of Tukwila's large commercial /industrial base. Annexation Boundary Adjustment Only the King County Boundary Review Board may adjust the existing Cascade annexation boundary. The City is not empowered to do this. 11 LAND USE ZONING A major part of this brochure is to ask for comments on the PRELIMINARY zoning map recommended by a Task Force of area residents and land owners. The zoning map is shown on the back page. Preliminary recommendations generally adjust County zoning to maintain viable single family neighborhoods, reflect current use, and respond to specific community comments. The Task Force will meet a final time to discuss public comments and modify zoning recommendations. 111 NEXT STEPS The remaining major steps in this process area 1. Adopt Pre - annexation Zoning Aug. 10th: Planning Commission Public Hearing Aug. 24th: Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council Sep. llth: City Council Public Hearing Oct. 16th: City Council Public Hearing and Decision on Zoning 2. Confirm Annexation Boundary by November 15th (King County Boundary Review Board). 3. Hold Annexation Vote on February 6, 1990 Should annexation fail, there would be no change in existing service providers, taxes, or King County zoning. This brochure has been successful if it has answered some of your questions and started you thinking about others. You are invited to contact Vernon Umetsu at 433 -1858, at the Tukwila Department of Community Development if we can be of further help. All registered voters and property owners will be automatically notified. \3 • t y xt' Fj / CO J 1 L • •Yi, �ti1�c. •, )IT,,;iti n. ,.7 • •1, • rN0.5 f.� , ••, . . , • • ltr ,` 'I• •1. M • � y ' • f f t Y' • L . L r. • t • 11.4.7.2 R4 R•i R•4 RMH C•1 C•2 *TASK FORCE PRELIMINARY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION SINGLE PAWS RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 3 AND 4 TOWNHOUSES . • LOW DENSITY APARTMENTS NION DENSITY APARTMENTS COMMUNITY RETAIL REGIONAL RETAIL * City Councils ::wi►l final decision on October 16th;. 1989 A LARGER DETAILED MAP IS AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL FOR REVIEW. .CONTACT VERNON UMETSU 433 -1858 t C4 s 1414414 P.I • ***Foxes AOOM iiifoti j Adb11ITY 1�•1�. {, �';. -.•_ oAu, •A•t• ti, . - • • t • 1148118T • ►1101. $Y t 3 7;.,. r • M t.. {t I. • . l i... /' i ,iiwsr r • • i',fli • t' i i MAX UNITS PER ACRE E /AC 11 /AC 1E /AC 22 /AC 30 /AC 4' I, WENDY BULL AFF10AVIT [l Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting (l Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet J Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit SEE ATTACHED TASK FORCE MEMBERS LIST: Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION File Number 89 - n O F O I S T R("' B U T I O N hereby declare that: • Other TASK FORCE MEETING. was mailed to each of the following addresses on JULY 24, 1989. 0 Determination of Nonsignificance (] Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action EI Official Notice O Other , 19 . The Final. Task Force meeting will be held at: 7:00 P.K. July 27, 1989 Conference Room No. 3 Tukwila City Hall Agenda 1. Review public comments on the Preliminary Recommended Zoning Map from the July 19th information meeting and make any changes determined to be necessary. All revisions will be incorporated into a zoning map and explanatory text. This package will be presented as the Task Force Recommended Zoning for the Cascade area to the Planning Commission at a special meeting to be held on August 10th. See you on Thursday, Vernon Umetsu Ph. 433-1858 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEETING AGENDA City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Public Information Meeting of July 19, 1989 7:00- -9:00 P.M. Agenda 7:00 - -7:10 INTRODUCTION Purpose of meeting 7:10- -8:00 DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 8:00- -9:00 INFORMAL PUBLIC MEETINGS WITH CITY STAFF Presentations on three primary interest areas: fire, police and zoning. There will be a brief question and answer period with each presentation. Please limit questions to clarification and general issues in order to maximize informal meeting time available with City staff on specific issues. The following City staff and zoning Task Force members will be available to answer specific questions: Tom Keefe, Fire Chief Ron Waldner, Police Chief Ross Earnst, Director of Public Works Rick Beeler, Director of Community Development Pre - annexation zoning: David Livermore, Task Force Spokesperson Vernon Umetsu, Assoc. Planner, DCD City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor NOTICE FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING NO. 2 FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA SO. 144TH ST AND 42ND AVE SO JULY 19, 1989 7 -9 PM AGENDA 1. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC SERVICES TO CASCADE VIEW. 2. DISCUSSION OF PRELIMINARY TASK FORCE ZONING 'RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. INFORMAL MEETINGS WITH TUKWILA STAFF AND ELECTED OFFICIALS. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Fire Protection INTRODUCTION This is a follow -up information brochure to share the City's findings on providing services, revenues, and preliminary zoning since the May public information meeting. 1 PUBLIC SERVICES Fire service would continue to be summoned through "911 ". Primary fire protection would be provided by the Tukwila Fire Department through the Allentown Station and the Foster Fire Station. Mutual aid assistance from Fire Districts No. 11 and 2 would be provided under an existing agreement. An automatic mutual aid agreement over the entire Sea - Tac plateau is currently being negotiated between Fire Districts 11, 2, 24, 26 and the City of Tukwila to allow the closest unit to respond to a call, regardless of district boundaries. A decision between the providers is anticipated prior to 1990 before the annexation vote. Police Police services would continue to be summoned by dialing "911 ". Tukwila Police Department programs include crime prevention, drug education, and in -depth investigation units; as well as uniformed patrol units. Joint operations with the region's law enforcement agencies will continue. Response time is anticipated to reflect Tukwila averages. This is generally 3 minutes for emergency calls and 7 -8 minutes for non - emergency calls. Public Works An initial Public Works Department analysis shows capital projects that should be scheduled are a traffic signal at So. 130th and Hwy. 99, paving So. 144th, possible pedestrian improvements around Cascade Elementary School, and an unspecified amount of storm drainage improvements to be funded by a new City utility tax. There are also pedestrian safety and storm drainage problems along Military Rd. So., which is now in the City of Sea -Tac. These improvements would be jointly planned. Sewer and Water Service Sewer and Water Service will continue to be provided by the existing districts. This will include but not be limited to new line installation, maintenance, and billing. General Government Tukwila will provide all general government services through its City Hall, 10 minutes from Cascade View. Representation The City is limited by State law to seven Council members who serve four year terms. City Council members are elected by the whole city, not by any one district. Thus, council members would provide the same level of representation for Cascade View as they do for the Riverton or Tukwila Hill neighborhoods. Annexation approval in 1990 would make Cascade View residents eligible to run for three City Council seats or the Mayor's position in 1991. King County City of TWtrY I ifffiff Dislrl 5 1 Representative for 198.000 1 County Executive for 1,413,900 With Cascade View Council Positions at Large 7 Representatives for 14,000 1 Mayor or 14,000 Earlier opportunities for direct participation in Tukwila's government are available through the many citizen boards such as the Planning Commission, Arts . Commission, Library Board, and Board of Adjustment. The Mayor appoints and the City Council confirms these appointments. Annexation Property Tax Impacts Property taxes now paid by owners in Cascade View will be reduced upon annexation to Tukwila. Three separate taxes now paid would be incorporated within a lower Tukwila city tax as shown below: Tax Rate /$1,000 County_ Tukwila Fire $1.50 $ -0- Library 0.53 -0- Co. Road 1.72 -0- Tukwila N.A. $3.17 TOTAL TAX $3.75 $3.17 This tax rate difference results in a $58 tax reduction on a $100,000 single family home at this time. Lowering taxes while providing higher service levels is possible because of Tukwila's large commercial /industrial base. Annexation Boundary Adjustment Only the King County Boundary Review Board may adjust the existing Cascade annexation boundary. The City is not empowered to do this. 11 LAND USE ZONING A major part of this brochure is to ask for comments on the PRELIMINARY zoning map recommended by a Task Force of area residents and land owners. The zoning map is shown on the back page. Preliminary recommendations generally adjust County zoning to maintain viable single family neighborhoods, reflect current use, and respond to specific community comments. The Task Force will meet a final time to discuss public comments and modify zoning recommendations. 11I NEXT STEPS The remaining major steps in this process are: 1. Adopt Pre - annexation Zoning Aug. 10th: Planning Commission Public Hearing Aug. 24th: Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council Sep. llth: City Council Public, Hearing Oct. 16th: City Council Public Hearing and Decision on Zoning 2. Confirm Annexation Boundary by November 15th (King County Boundary Review Board). 3. Hold Annexation Vote on February 6, 1990 Should annexation fail, there would be no change in existing service providers, taxes, or King County zoning. This brochure has been successful if it has answered some of your questions and started you thinking about others. You are invited to contact Vernon Umetsu at 433 -1858, at the Tukwila Department of Community Development if we can be of further help. All registered voters and property owners will be automatically notified. - . •••,; .„ .1J ** • -- • • 1 : • • . 0114 t• • — • . ,;:• I ft117.4 • /7' • •■• • 4V.' .. ;: r :63 V • • % 1! •7 0 -•••,•1 ; • ,;••••, :.% • '.' rt • 44; *. - • . ■•,: •.* ' !i t cps!! pi.44 cAILcM.. • • .• "' :-; - • ‘flt'r • • ' '• • • ." • • ; . '1 • - • • • •• .• ; • 'f.R; • • f:: ,`)•, • • - • • • , ••,,w f2(1:1 r•No 5 ;'.; • :.• • I • •,:f • . l [l t j..! R•1.7.2 MN R-2 R-3 11-4 C•I C.2 *TASK FORCE PRELIMINARY ZONING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL 3 AND 4 TOWNHOUSES LOW DENSITY APARTMENTS NIGH DENSITY APARTMENTS COMMUNITY RETAIL REGIONAL RETAIL * City Cobncit*ikmake final decision on October .101;. 1989 A LARGER DETAILED MAP IS AVAILABLE AT TUKWILA CITY HALL FOR REVIEW: .CONTACT VERNON UMETSU 433-1858 : . . •i• • • . • . 11' ' • \•. asitfonee ruiAommOX66ifori:!;; 4 /1.1601ire•ii.14.i • NORITT 7:: • ' $MH • • ,. • C•2 y:• • • • '• ' s • t. • 1 I. • •M11111111111111111==l11MIRIt. MAX UNITS PER ACRE 6/AC M/AC 15/AC 22/AC 30/AC I, WENDY.BULL • AFFIDAVIT 0 Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision. Agenda Packet SEE ATTACHED CASCADE TASK FORCE MEMBERS LIST: Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION File Number 89 -2-n O F D I S T R r- B U T I O N hereby declare that: Si ure 0 Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance (J Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action O Official Notice 0 Notice of Application for © Other TASK FORCE MEETING. Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit (] Other Hand Delivered was WWI to each of the following addresses on JUNE 28, 1989. KING COUNTY ZONING AND TUKWILA PROPOSED ZONING MAPS INCLUDED. 19 .;% FISCAL AND SERVICE IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THE CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION PROJECT MANAGER Alan Doerschel, Finance Director Maxine Anderson, City Clerk Rick Beeler, Planning Ross Earnst, Public Works Tom Keefe, Fire Ron Waldner, Police Don Williams, Parks /Recreation CITY. OF T U' K ' I L . A : 6200 Southcenter Blvd ` Tukwila, Washington 98188 .:' (206) 433=1800 "CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Population * Housing Multi- Family Single Family Total Number of Acres Persons per Acre Assessed Valuation Per Capita Valuation Per Acre Valuation *Appendix A REPc,Ac&4 OV 7 1 TABLE 1 Selected Cascade Characteristics CASCADE 3,061 1,099 1,768 Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 4 CITY OF TIIKVVIIA 10,923 2,163 5,585 581 5,143 5.27 2.12 $100,900,500 $1,670,000,000 $32,963 $152,888 $173,667 $324,713 PROJECTED NEW CITY TOTAL, 13,984 3,262 4.091 7,353 5,724 2.44 $1,770,900,500 $126,638 $309,382 • • CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION FISCAL AND SERVICE IMPACT ANALYSIS Addendum to Pages 8,19 and 11 Police Services PAGE 8 . . Estimated annual activity based on King County Police records from July, August and September 1988 indicate between 6,000 - 9,000 calls for service. Based on this estimate, the need for additional personnel would be 6 to 8 FTE's or $255,000 to $345,000 and an additional $75,000 to $125,000 for Valley -Com, jail services, and other operational and maintenance costs. The new cost estimates for Police Services are $330,000 to $470,000. PAGE 10 Table 5 update: RANGE OF OPERATING COSTS AND FULL - TIME EMPLOYEES (FIT'S) LOW NO. OF HIGH NO. OF RANGE FTE'S RANGE FTE'S Annual Total $650,000 9 $895,000 13 PAGE 11 Annual estimated operating revenues of $738,210 are now compared to an estimated range of expenditures of $650,000 to $895,000. . • T. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: John McFarland, City Administrator Ron Waldner, Chief of Police August 8, 198 Cascade View - Projected Police Expenditures • MEMORANDUM City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Police Department 433 -1808 Based on July 1989 activity, the Tukwila Police Department projects the following annual activity for the current city: Current population: 11,000 Current commissioned officers: 48 Police calls for service (projected): 23,000/27,000 Part I crime (projected): 2,700/3,000 Annual activity within "Cascade View," based on King County Police records from July, August, and September 1988: Current population: Calls for service (projected): Part I crime (projected): 3,000 8,612 888 The following data was pulled from King County Police reports (from three months of 1988 data): 55 Assaults 15 Robbery or related activity 1 Rape 4 Indecent Exposure 1 Indecent Liberty 8 Commercial Burglary 21 Residendal Burglary 30 Auto Thefts 3 Forgeries 30 Shoplifts 32 Fight Disturbance Calls John McFarland August 8, 1989 Page Two 43 Criminal Trespass 32 Vandalism 153 Vice Incidents 14 Narcotic Cases 133 Traffic Incidents 19 Felony warrants served 24 Misdemeanor warrants served Over 8,000 calls for service for such a small population and geographical area is indicative of some serious problems. Without study data on complainant and victim background, it is impossible to determine how the activity is proportioned between the residential and transient population. It would appear, this area is impacted by a similar phenomena that exists in Tukwila - most of our police demands for service are a result of our location, retailrndustrial impacts, traffic access, and being at the crossroads of "everything." 8,000 calls for service, under most staffing formulas, projects out to a patrol staffing level of eight to ten officers. This would most likely be a single patrol district with two person staffing a good part of the time. Conservatively, I would recommend a beginning approach of a single patrol district staffed with six personnel. This gives us manning for about 6,000 calls for service and assumes we are up to workable staffing levels in the current city. In addition, we would impact the following areas immediately: Support personnel (2) - Front office personnel needed to process the paper /activity volume. Special Operations (1) - Detective for added vice and narcotic activity. Equipment (1) additional patrol vehicle. Miscellaneous - Hiring/training expenses, overtime until additional staff is oriented, jail contracts, Valley Comm. etc. RGW:tm File: A5621 cc: Alan Doerschel, Finance Director SECTIONS I . Introduction FIGURE II Revenue Impacts III Cost Impacts for Annual Operations IV Summary and Discussion APPENDIX A. Cascade View Area Vicinity Map A. Population Data Cascade View TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES 1. Selected Cascade Characteristics . Property Tax Rate Comparison With and Without Annexation . Sales Tax Revenue 4. Summary of Revenue Impact PAGE 3 5 8 11 7 5. Range of Operating Costs and Full -time Employees for Cascade View 10 12 13 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis' • Page 3 SCOPE OF STUDY BACKGROUND I. INTRODUCTION This study provides a general planning analysis of the fiscal impact of providing Tukwila service to the Cascade View annexation area. The estimated cost and service impacts on Tukwila are based on a department level review of the area characteristics, and the staffing levels that departments would request to serve the area. Also included are possible capital project requirements. Specific decisions about the staffing requirements for the annexation area will be made when the City adopts an amended budget for the annexation. The City of Tukwila has received an annexation petition from the area known as Cascade View. The Cascade area lies within parts of Census Tracts 271, 273, and 281, and in the Puget Sound Council of Government's (PSCOG) Riverton Forecast Area Zone 3820. The Cascade area is bounded by South 152nd, Pacific Highway South, Military Road, 24th Avenue, and 116th Way. King County currently provides general government, road improvements, and police service. Other public services are provided by Water Districts 20 and 125; Rainier Vista and Val Vue Sewer Districts; Fire Districts 11 and 2; and the King County Library District. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila would provide general government road improvements, police service and fire protection. The existing sewer, water, and library districts would continue to serve the area in their current roles. Tukwila does not envision assuming these special purpose district functions. A more detailed analysis of City services is provided in Section III. The City is planning to implement a Surface Water Utility in January of 1990. This study does not include costs of staffing for this new utility. Table 1 summarizes some basic population data of the Cascade area. It is important to note that this area has an estimated population of 3,061 and encompasses 581 acres; that Tukwila absorbed a population increase of 6,200 on 2,700 acres between December, 1988 and April, 1989; and that the City has generally completed increasing its staff /service capability to serve these new areas at Tukwila standards. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 4 Population * Multi- Family Single Family Total *Appendix A TABLE 1 Selected Cascade Characteristics 3,061 1,768 CITY OF % OF : TUKWILA TUKWILA 10,923 28 5,585 51 20 32 Number of Acres 581 5,143 11 Persons per Acre 5.27 2.12 250 Assessed Valuation $100,900,500 $1,670,000,000 6 Per Capita Valuation $32,963 $152,888 22 Per Acre Valuation $173,667 $324,713 53 CASCADE. VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 5 II. REVENUE IMPACTS The most significant sources of potential revenue to the City from the annexation area are property tax, state shared revenues and sales tax. State shared revenue and sales tax are constant and do not change whether the area is in the City or not. A City property tax of 3.010 would be a new levy upon annexation. Taxes which would be dropped upon annexation are: the Fire District tax ($1.50), the County Road tax ($1.681) and Library tax ($0.500). Property owners would thus realize a drop in tax rate from $3.681 per $1,000 assessed valuation, to $3.010 per $1,000 assessed valua- tion. All other area taxes would remain constant. The annual impact of these different property tax rates, based on the 1989 levy rates for the area, are shown on Table 2. TABLE 2 Property Tax Rate Comparison With and Without Annexation 1989 Assessed Valuation of Cascade View Area $100,900,500 With Annexation: Tukwila Tax Rate 3.010* Tukwila Levy $303,710 King County Equivalent Rate: Fire District #11 Tax Rate 1.500 Road District Tax Rate 1.681 Rural Library Tax Rate .500 Combined Tax Rate 3.681 Combined Levy $371,415 *General Levy for Tukwila Only 1989 During the first two years after annexation, revenue from property taxes are affected by various timing considerations. Property tax levy rates are set in one year and assessed and collected in the next year: This means that, regardless of when an annexation occurs, the property taxes for the current year would already be set and cannot be changed before the following year. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 6 Revenue from the City's general tax levy is affected by the timing of the annexation. If the annexation takes place before March 1, the City can levy property tax in the current year for collection in the following year, and there would be no revenue from the City property tax until the following year. If annexation takes place after March 1, the City cannot levy the tax until the following year, which means it is not collected until the second year after annexation, and there is no revenue collected during the first two calendar years after annexation. To some extent, this delay in collection of the City's general property taxes is made up by the provision that any Road District taxes that have been levied but not been collected as of the annexation date are distributed to the City upon collection. Also, the City would receive rev- enue from Fire District #11 in exchange for providing fire service, and would not have to pay for library service for the new citizens during this period. The retail sales and use tax is another source of revenue from the annexation area. The estimate of retail sales tax revenue, shown on Table 3, is based on a drive -by survey of the annexation area. Information on taxable sales from these businesses in 1988 was provided by the Department of Revenue. Tukwila's sales tax rate is one percent; fifteen percent of the local sales tax revenue collected within the City is allo- cated to the County. Table 3 reflects the County's share and the amount of revenue remaining for the City — approximately $144,500 for the area. TABLE 3 Sales Tax Revenue Number of Retail Businesses 30 Retail Taxable Sales $17,000,000 Local Sales Tax Rate 1.0% Local Sales Tax Revenue $170,000 Less: County 15% ( 25,500) Tukwila Sales Tax Revenue $144,500 Other significant revenues for the area would be generated by state distributed revenues and locally imposed fees and fines. These are shown on Table 4 which includes footnotes on the method of estimating each revenue. Some of the rev- enues are restricted to specific uses. The motor vehicle fuel tax must be used for road purposes, the real estate excise tax must be used for capital projects, and emer- gency medical services (EMS) funds must be used for fire programs. Unrestricted revenues can be used for any purpose designated by the City. As shown on Table 4 the estimated annual amount of revenue that would come to the City from the annexation area is $636,210 in unrestricted sources and $102,000 from restricted sources. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 7 TABLE 4 Summary of Revenue Impact Unrestricted Revenue: Property Tax 1 $303,710 Sales Tax 2 144,500 Business Licenses /Fees 3 5,000 Permits /Planning Fees 4 50,000 Motor Vehicle Excise Tax 5 42,000 Liquor Excise Tax /Profits 6 . 36,000 Court Fees, Fines, etc. 7 40,000 Other Taxes, Fees, Charges 8 15.000 Unrestricted Total $636,210 Restricted Revenues: Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 9 $ 75,000 Real Estate Transfer Tax 10 7,000 EMS 11 20,900 Restricted Total $102.000 Grand Total Revenues $738,210 1. See Table No.2 2. See Table No.3 3. Based on number of businesses and percentage of misc. fees. 4. Assumes level of permitting activity equivalent to Foster / Riverton /Thorndyke. 5. Based on state formulas. 6. Based on state formulas. 7. Based on same level of activity as Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke. 8. Based on level of activity of total current city. 9. Based on state formulas. 10. Based on estimated current property turnover rate. 11. Based on current distribution from King County. • ' CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 8 III. COST IMPACTS FOR ANNUAL OPERATIONS The impact of annexation on Tukwila's costs for annual operations are primarily from the additional personnel that would be needed to serve the Cascade View area. There are some one time costs for additional equipment (e.g. vehicles, desk and chairs). A range of cost estimates was developed based on information supplied by department heads as to personnel and equipment needs. Personnel costs were esti- mated using the mid -range monthly salary for the same or similar positions that currently exist in the City; benefits were estimated at 25 percent of salary costs. The estimated cost impacts are based on experience of the previous annexations. The City will review these results internally. Final decisions about staffing require- ments for the annexation area will be made when the City adopts an amended budget for the annexation. All costs are shown as a range of estimates. A range was used to reflect the uncertainty about the overlapping impacts on services with previous annexations . General: The potential cost of additional facilities is not included in the analysis because of the low probability that this annexation by itself will require new buildings. Although there will be some resultant pressure on existing facilities. Police Services: The impacts on police service relate to both the size of the geo- graphic area, the density of the population, and the nature of criminal activity in the area. The annexation area is mainly residential, but there are some commercial areas (e.g. along Highway 99) that may attract a different type and frequency of criminal activity. The Police Department has estimated that it would need a 3 to 5 additional FTE's to handle the calls for service and projected increased activity. The total annual labor cost impact for the Police Department, ranges from $126,000 to $210,000. Additional costs for Valley -Com, jail services, and other operation and maintenance costs are estimated to range from $50,000 to $75,000. The total cost estimates for Police services are $176,000 to $285,000. The four existing Police Patrol Districts would not need to be increased to accommodate this annexation. Fire Protection Services: The annexation will not require an additional fire station. However, costs for Valley- Communications dispatch services, supplies, and other related expenses ranges from $15,000 to $30,000. Fire District #11, which currently provides service to Cascade View will turn over some of their assets in proportion to the value assumed . by the City of Tukwila. The City already has a mutual aid agreement with District No. 11 for cooperative service upon request. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 9 Negotiations are currently underway to integrate fire protection over the entire plateau with automatic mutual aid agreements between Tukwila and Fire Dis- trict Nos. 11, 2, and 24. The nearest provider would be automatically called via the 911 system with this agreement. All parties anticipate having automatic mutual aid by January 1990. Municipal Court: The annexation will affect Municipal Court costs because of the additional criminal and traffic cases that must be handled by the City. The Municipal Court has estimated that additional extra labor will be needed. Other Municipal Court costs include judicial, prosecuting attorney, public defense payments and payment for the Southeast Community Alcohol Treatment Center. The estimated costs for Municipal Court range from $15,000 to $25,000. Community Development: The Planning and Building Divisions would be affected by increases in building permit applications and development review tasks generated from the annexation area. An additional 1 -2 FTE(s) may be required to service this estimated demand which is expected to be equivalent to the Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke annexations. The range of costs including labor, professional services, and ancillary costs is $60,000- $75,000 and has been included in the estimate at Table 5. Parks and Recreation: The Parks Department estimates that the impact of annexa- tion would be relatively small, since residents in the area already use Tukwila's recreation programs. There would be some increase in costs for staffing recre- ation programs, mailing notices of classes and programs, and providing trans- portation services for senior citizens. The estimated costs for the Recreation Department, ranges from $10,000 - $15,000. Administrative: The City's various legislative and administrative functions would be affected by the overall increase in responsibilities resulting from annexation, with impacts for the City Clerk, Finance Departments and Personnel Depart- ment. Annexation would also affect the responsibilities of the Mayor and City Council, but this increase cannot be easily translated into dollar amounts. The total cost impact for the Finance Department assumes that the existing sewer and water utilities would continue to serve, and that they would not be respon- sible for any billings to sewer and water customers in the annexation area. The total cost for these functions including insurance, range from $20,000 to $30,000. Public Works: The Public Works Department would be affected by the addition of roads and facilities that would result from annexation. The Department has determined the number of road miles in the area and looked at facilities in the area. The Department has identified staffing requirements of 2 to 3 FTEs for the annexation area based on this review. In addition to staffing requirements, there would be equipment rental costs. The General Fund effort includes Administration, Engineering Services, and Facilities Maintenance. The Street Fund portion includes maintenance of new City streets. The total cost impact ranges from $100,000 to $125,000. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION IV. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 11 The only significant road project is the need for a signal at 130th and Highway 99 at an estimated cost of $200,000. Also, a paving project from 144th to Military Road for $53,000 is in the King County Capital Plan. The current City policy is for newly annexed residential streets to be improved through L.I.D.'s. Any other minor improvements that would be necessary are included in the opera- tions and maintenance costs portion of this report. The annual revenues for the annexation area is estimated at $738,210 (see Table 4). Estimated annual operating costs range from $496,000 to $710;000, including Street Fund operations and maintenance costs (see Table 5). The high range of expendi- tures is virtually the same as the estimated revenues. Amounts for one -time costs are not shown in this analysis, but are expected to be nominal. There are several reasons for the apparent matching of revenues and expenditures as well as other ramifications to be examined. The impact of the Fire District #1 and Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke annexations brought two new police patrol districts as well as a new fire station close to the annexation area. The total number of positions added for these earlier annexations was 48.5 FTE's and approximately $2.5 million dollars in annual additional expendi- tures. These increases, facility space acquisition, and equipment purchases will enable the City to absorb this annexation area for the projected additional expenditures. This annexation will increase Tukwila's population to 14,000 residents which is very close to the 15,000 population threshold. At 15,000 population the City would be required to take over all traffic signals on State highways (approximately 20) at a total annual maintenance cost of $100,000. Also, there may be some incremental costs for services which cannot be determined at this time. CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TABLE 5 Fiscal and Service Impact Analysis Page 10 Community Services: Several community service costs are budgeted in the Mayor's Office, including the costs for library and health services contract. The City pays the King County Health Department for services provided to City citizens based on a contractual agreement; the estimates for this contract are based on pop- ulation in the annexation areas. The library contract provides for payment of $19.53 per capita and the estimates are based on this per capita amount. The City contributes to various other programs on a voluntary basis; since these programs provide direct services to individuals, it is assumed that contri- butions would be increased in proportion to the increase in population related to annexation. The total estimated cost for these community services ranges from $100,000 to $125,000. Summary Operating Costs: Table 5 summarizes the range of costs for each de- partment. Range of Operating Costs and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for Cascade View LOW NO. HIGH NO. RANGE "Ms RANGE "FTL Police Department $176,000- ,3 $285,000. 5 Fire Department 15,000 - 30,000 - Municipal Court 15,000 - 25,000 - Community Development 60,000 .1 75,000 2 Parks /Recreation 10,000 - 15,000 - Administrative 20,000 - 30,000 - Community Services 100,000 - 125,000 Public Works :General /Street IQQIN 2 125.000 / Annual Total $496,000 6 $710,000 10 *Includes only regular full -time or part -time employees Capital Improvements: Based on a review of King County's capital improvement plans, and discussions with Tukwila's Public Works Department, only two capital improvement projects have been identified for the annexation area. Since sewer and water services would be provided by existing purveyors, no capital improvements for these services were identified. The annexation area has some surface water problems, however, these will become part of the total surface water program revenue and expenditure analysis. Riverton TUKWILA Foster Thorndyke CASCADE VIEW Page 12 LEGEND am me im ma Tlikwila City Limits me MR OM Sea Tic City Limits Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE CASCADE .VIEW ANNEXATION Appendix A Population Data Decade View Fiscal, and Service Impact Analysis Page 13 NUMBER OF OCCUPANCY AVERAGE TOTAL UNITS 1' RATE 2 PERSON/UNIT 3 POP/ESTIMATE Multi - Family 1,099 .95 1.5 1,569 Single- Family .97 2.3 1.492 TOTALS 1,768 061 1 Obtained from map of King County Cascade View Existing Land Use,1987. 2 Obtained from the City Clerk's Census Data of May 31, 1989. 3 Obtained from the City Clerk's Census Data of May 31 1989. SEE ATTACHED: MAYOR CITY CLERK • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION WENDY BULL hereby declare that: 0 Notice of Public Hearing cX Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit [] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 1989. Task Force Members Name of Project CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION File Number 89 -2 —A Determination of Nonsignificance Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice , 19 . WRiV41.4414.mera1:1116 9izja3.. 111fiaftk nvawwcu er.i.109 wnuwwtnc+ w+m1cbu rm1 .7t147J�ttlr.:s01 R�ItsiY.11a a13J 1f 3,im; witfhxtlsabin�nsktusaomaxlft tQ.�sJ TPffiaINtA'3ERAMMON447410 YI l0 June 16, 1989 Dear Task Force Member: Please let me congratulate you on the tremendous job you did last night. I thought that there was a thorough discussion of the issues and that responsible decisions were made. The next Task Force meeting will be held on: Agenda: 1. Complete zoning for specific sites. 2. Review TUKWILA zoning for overall area. 3. Schedule public information meeting, Planning Commission meetings, and City Council meetings. 4. Discuss new City information flyer: a. questions /issues that need answers, b. old information which should be repeated, c. other. The previous flyer is attached. Please call me at 433 -1858 if you have any questions. vu /Wb 06 -16 -89 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor CASCADE TASK FORCE MEETING AGENDA 7:00 P.M. June 22, 1989 Conference Room No. 3 Tukwila City Hall Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner 1909 City O v Of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CASCADE TASK FORCE MEETING AGENDA The next Task Force meeting will be held on: Agenda: 7:00 P.M. June 15, 1989 Conference Room No. 3 Tukwila City Hall 1. Continue evaluation of zoning issue sites and establishing preliminary zoning recommendations for each location. We completed evaluation and preliminary zoning recommendations for two sites at the last meeting. There are approximately 15 more sites to do. Please consider the feasibility of meeting on Thursday, June 22nd, should we not finish evaluating all sites on the 15th. AFFIDAVIT OF D I STR,T - BUT I ON J,, /440A( 64,0-?7 hereby declare that: [] Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short. Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit f/q NO bclu ve&I) was ntf to each of the following addresses on FY G-) G/K0 `P ' UGC. N I FoR7D Name of Project C,4SCA - 0 ,6r G File Number 89 -2 —A Q Determination of Nonsignificance [] Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice • Notice of Action Q Official Notice ,rr 4 . �rlt -- Other CA5cA - "krAw' c,f To'/• Oon!I -(G lSSu6SS- s" ,rTreel cffct cis C74 6 Er - 7 - 05K p' D/Z c e ///: e - Signature 1987 City'f Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Cascade. Annexation Task Force Seattle, Washington RE: Preannexation Zoning Issues to be Reviewed and Meeting Notice. Dear Task Force Member, May 25,1989 Attached are maps of the issue areas we developed at the May 18th Task Force meeting and as later indicated by group members. These maps include only general information. I have not yet gone out to specially visit each site. This will be your project and mine for the June 1st meeting. Please remember that these issue areas are only the first general list of comments on potential changes or improvements desired. Comments may be dropped from further analysis or specifically addressed by the group once we have all visited the sites, and had a chance to discuss them on June 1st. Please note a lass of King County zoning called "Potential Zoning" for some areas. There is not usually any Council decision required to achieve potential zoning densities even though "standard zoning" may be for single family units (6 units /acre) and potential zoning may be for maximum density multi- family (48 units per acre). Achieving Potential Zoning is usually related to overcoming engineering constraints to site development. The Cascade Zoning Map you have seen . reflects "Potential Zoning." The issue information provided includes Potential and standard zoning designations when applicable. TASK FORCE ASSIGNMENT Please visit each issue site prior to the next meeting so that we can discuss at the June 1st meeting. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner MEETING AGENDA The next Task Force meeting will be held on: 7:00 P.M. June 1, 1989 Conference Room No. 3 Tukwila City Hall ;111/6/..4 Discussion of. Public Works issues by Ross Earnst, Public Works Department Director. Review Issue Comments- -What comments should be incorporated as task force recommendations. Comparable Zoning- - Discuss Tukwila Zoning Go over map and determine what would be appropriate comparable Tukwila zoning to substitute for existing King County zoning. PRELIMINARY CASCADE VIEW TASK' FORCE COMMENTS AND APPLICABLE LOCATIONS Comment Number Location Numbers COUNT NUMBER TASK FORCE COMMENT LOCATION "UMBER 1 Rezone from General Commercial to Tukwila light Industrial (M -1) with allowed building height to 115 feet. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CG (General Commercial) /HC (Highway Oriented Business) EXISTING LAND USE Truck /heavy equipment sales and storage. NUMBER OF ACRES: 12.0 STAFF NOTES 1) Construction in the western portion is difficult due to steep slopes with probable high groundwater levels; 2) Access to the northern two - thirds of the site is only via an earth ramp from the southern one - third. No direct access to Highway 99 from northern portion is possible without extensive site work. 3) The site is isolated by an approximately seventy -five foot high steep slope from uphill apartments to the west and north. A 115 foot high building could rise above the top of slope. VK 747-"". - ,,LtQ Iii oItaot — -6- — 0 4 • a _ 5 x176 1 ` \, ■ A t . : ir r 1 , 1 ' i '_ I ies 1 r� I N I Nl._1 I I". V I: '1'4 `I'I \. O _ _;_-_,..-4t_ 5� = _i2 �1i(SLt 1a) ° \ ? .�:, A.. uRAYI'3'1 SMITH + 4 \ • �L d1 1 1 6 • I \\ I. [JO ____,AL. ._.. 1 - 1 t '1'elJ ,..c3 ( � \ t • .. I • I It 0 I °IVb° Z1 Il�l -•- �� � J. �LLsil__- - 8_-- -- 1 ' -r ..l _ - `i 1- - - -._ ._ -- ~ '' 7 [. 466 . .. _ _ __ O 1_�J r�J._ -- �Jjl.O _ H �� • I00 e� pun ; I ; ° IL410 I ‘ FRANK L J!J!! -- �� I m o 1 \ HAPKA 9 ti� - Ac- - - ., I 1 0811E 11414 o � k i - - - • b i 1 \ ) U 496:20 1 ) It 464 y \ S rt 4s! t 12 • 12 ZO 6 I t 9 J0 _ e 1 1.5 - P1? 96 ,_ .- �^ , . . T _. 7 k � - _ ` .f: !i S:- -425_! ' .../ y°: ( ;w . . u nn y�o L v Jsa se iiP , m_ �...., _ rte 7:04--L—MCI! 31 [ ` I 1 24 0 il,• - ,l . o TEO NAKKERUO el 'G. ._ � ��o � .,� a .ro JI, K; 1 �� s % �� ‘10 . ,. "r'J R. F. ERICK50N . 1 4ti AG. \t 141 \7��� • N4;911 x i d � 3.31 Ac. L r( (!d 45046 It /!! w 417 01 l •, I J. H. LiARDMER 2.04 A. RICHARD J. FRANKLIN "" 1.89 Ac. re.HV 1 J \ I1 - %...r' 11 T2U A',I NC • • ' 1 9.b.ZAc. '' • t ', \ 1 !°b6F. 4 1 1 t 1 , -. \. A - a U A' A P A M r M A '4 '! . 8 • 1 ! 5 ' - 1 / Z. _ l -�t 4Jl. 7J 1 HS 75 j ay? . • 0041 • 70 oi 1 a 1 d0 ( .'Oe Z 1 I NI I 1 .o I N 1 N 2 40 1 I I "4 ' . 4 1 '° 4 I 1 i4s t - oze[ s 1 l2P ID ST ) �• N It a1e5 a 174 140 1 ' 1. . 1 d0 It, fi , N II I I \" �� '7u it 99T tP 0.4I Ac teo 0 `• J v *1. • o 7 4 . 14 ASSUNT DE.SI MONt 1' r t. 95 �, d CULE5 P. 5011. IN 3.86 A rt. THOMAS BRI WILLIAM 34 /At 100 • • COMMENT NUMBER TASK FORCE COUNT Current zoning was established after extensive community discussion. The developer agreed to restrict development to senior (over 55 year old) housing /tenants. How can this restriction be continued? KING COUNTY ZONING /COKPREHENSIVE PLAN RM 2400P (Medium Density Multi- Family = 18 units per acre) /LD (Low Density Multi- Family): EXISTING LAND USE Vacant wooded area NUMBER OF ACRES: 6.8 STAFF NOTES 1) Riverton Hospital should be contacted to confirm recording of rezone condition with assessor's Office. 2) A total maximum 123 units can be developed on these two lots. 3) Comparable Tukwila zoning is R3 (14.5 units /acre or R4 21.8 units /acre) LOCAT ION'1['IDER 2 v 0.31 4c ,.t 1d( R. F. ERICKSON 3.31 Ac. AUDREY L STEWART 3.51 Ac % 4- r.1. •7Qa J ✓J O t 1ED NAKKERUO 1.46 Ac. Is r/ 71 /00 \LZ 2' V r r .104 1.J61 RICHARD J. FRANKLIN 1.89 Ac 41121 4 1Ie J. H. GAROIIER i'O4 AL 1117 4,!•1 rio elJ • -- �tIJ= _i_T s,.,6_ — , S - 127TH 1O T,_- r1 - Ja-, - r' - - -- • ,1 � - - - -- t /'6ZM Ac �� c I I TO% r l Je. // ttes Tres ao d'J I I I ■ w(� 1.1 I ti , d 8 b AC o • y N , o (� 7 ° a s � 71661 11 \ , 6 Jt e 1 1 , 0 1 = 4/ 1 br i c 71 193 Z /JOY 1Z. J. ar 15 rJ dl . ` a R I I p r - � ,.. A� a R11 5� r / tie 71 ;� 0.1 00 .11t /1 , 111x6 1 •r t,• 1 1 ` r - - -I b x1.46$ • • 1 „i 1 , / L 1' I IN It 6. __ 1 a` 0.87Ac - -�,.� 0.6IAc.h �r L__ 1 1 1 4M t6o r 1 OHS �(� o v, . ao�rb ___ j x 4 . 439 10 r.•/ Jd 60 - - ,t utr! � `� 5..0r128TH , ,OST. ap 163 15 ' S La CO ,� r ST r I r' • 128 1�3I �-+ / l 7 1711 o .So I � r 2�-J 1 N N s 1 i I�i1 Izo 8 (2) 1 1 .o J $ , r,. +�. 1 11 f1" 11 73 . N f� K N ® ti >r N y .. . r l 767 19 - o 1LLOWELL 9° 1 IS Ac � c� I I y r. di L 1 r.l 1 I. TJiraTuRr• — ■ 1 j1/ 1.11 (174 01 1241 031 Ac. r. L. MS 14 1 1 ITP _ j reo l o __ - /do r } Zz ooid .IZ4 z ° i3 495'.20 . 16.6.70 1666.11 Cob 1 - -- . f?>'_— t.3roe 13 10 Itt9 .i 1 , Nt ,, 1 r al .3„ N 1 -< \L 04 " 1 1 ..,, e1, ,, J L .. L ,.1.5 e 530 I 7!1771 12312 . I 1 4 — a1~- -T--- -L J.zJ_ ✓ --_8___- S�l 9 100 S: 12 5 Ti L l 47 1 uFo'7 yito_L,wr 120 34 1 1144 ".+ I 0 11 $1 i 1 1;0 1 !0 JO _I I. r., 1 11 17.410 j 1 t 0 S. 130TH PL,M Q 'vrr 1 ' \: ti • "4!? t,RAYVON SMIT 747 Ac • ... k ..r /0.7 IL 460 FRANK L HAPKA 1 (8 At V a N ,J0 r4.31, .Jl, "1, .90 o' .,04'0 ---- ''.% a 4 � , ^, v h — � Z7 r/1( 9 a ^) .156.153;13 ; 14 • :: W ^ ti �' , e b : ^ 500 I i e I2 4 ' 9 LJ b l LJ b b A 1 12 5 h - /d7.9/ r'rue - - r 1, _ PROGRESSIVE GARS IMC. co O (1) LOCATION WNIDER 3 (.) 'COMMENT NUMBER TASK FORCE COMMENT Change Comprehensive Plan designation from Single Family to Medium Density. Leave zoning at RS 7200. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS 7200 (6 single family units per acre) /SF (Single EXISTING LAND USE Single Family NUMBER OF ACRES: 1.9 STAFF NOTES 1) The proposed change would:.help justify later rezone to multi- family uses at 6 - 16.unit per acre densities. The owner anticipates duplex development (approximately'10 units, per 'acre maximum) I /IJ /1Cip 1 12219 t. 11112 9 h 1 4V At • titi b 4T1 " ▪ •. \, y pb ..oti u ti o "I ., u 71 1!J irk � 1Jo, k. 34 05 � 1 t 11 • s/ e 0 - o 11 r!1 71 .0 1J 00 1 5111 /3113 b ^ Ll.4sJ N. ,. 9 • ° h° 0.87 Ac o ,i.—p co ° 0.61 Ac. t"?, Z. .11/ _ 14111_1 113 MO 1 1100 .L . _ o J/0 Is ALI 1 1 r. • PO 11 •,/0130 14 2.1, 1 • • r k 1 , 1 1; 11 1 1 11 11 112 r j 12303 11036 la /J 13 Ilia Iti 1q as r.1 1 1401 4 ft5 � 12 top > I 9 11 /6/ QJ 60 31.1 16 12830 s r: L. 11 h E W 4 f11 I I 0"• N I N 1 1 1 s•' ` - - 20 —: S 11? ? sT ? CO 1 rl [ R - -- /-11 a y - _ s 4 /44 ro ro , ,. 110 Ise ,J e c tt ( Jleor l_.0f._ 4}- -- s �Q ' t1 � •v)e__ $ 1 =A r 1119.,1 o ._ �. 1" ii'- i 771-1- 1-14 1- Te 1- I• �I I NI D BLS= .=� N � 2 — — 1R S Lt __ i ` Out. ZI I 1 o 4 1 1 v 110 __Iii- i 1 13110 'A— 2 12 a • 1 113 ` :2:111- n .51411 3121 I -1 11 120 10 3 ! !! I�o - 01 - 1 1 1 10 I ` • o� °,JO v i 1 I NI 1 1 1 ti WM /MO r, 11413 o ' ;�M r�sH'- 11437 1;, 122441 114 22 - - - TT ° w ti • .0 113 ,r, R.N. HALLOWELL 14S At r.'.,54 .�•TrTSa7iAY 3.15 Ac. fl. 1St u r¢>ffa .195:2.9 k1 J. et) 1 14 1 1 / 100 L J7: '1171 740 ,1 11 .15343 a^ ,1( � L I .- -tip- - - _,r 7 1 1124 361 t I14M10 $��jo I ,- /! i "o I: 1 1 / 81 1 . J i • - o • • bl t $I 126135 --- -�L' ss _4_ moo_ 1 •M • I r w 1 fir 32 1 .0 1 i 0 ,00 1 /011�11 1 11 �,'I14 I211LI IINo 11 c • N 1r /o0 1 re) .r.r 601.73 15 `J 60 61 • 00 Z IT 1 $ r l 25 25 1 1:3123 9 60 JO / 1 10 6 1[466 ° 11410 11 AL- 1 1 »1 1116/ 17/ Yet ee 01 • 7, 133 GRAYDON SMITH 747 Ac. • 1204 JJ6 Jr R. F. ERICKSON 3.31 Ac. A UDREY L STEWART 3.51 Ac 11.1.c 4/ '11 w l a FRANK L HAPKA 1 08 At 1 4 � O , 4 q 7134 ,f• /, t 1 460 • ti ti • 11 441 • L 71 116 /JO x4.11, 110 L & FLOE YOUNG 2.8', Ac. 470 .4. 0 \L L1 r � 314 FED NAKKER 1.46 Ac 1]0: RICHARD J. F 1.89 A X71 107 (Ol Ll J)- QI tilti J. H. CARL 04 AI 1` 71 36 i1/ //7 ldL_rll_ PROGRESSIVE CARE 11 1�l a1 7L Jd p ,= 127TH �, : ST•= _ IX — - — — — / - 6 — tr1 At J1.31 1111 7166 to —es 1 1 / 1 1 1. Q 1 ►' • 14 1 A r 0 ♦� � • O S..0r128' 0 1 COMMENT NUMBER C TASK FORCE COMMENT LOCATION NUMBER 4,. 6, Traffic lights are needed if 130th /132nd streets will continue to carry existing traffic volumes. A well designed east -west road is needed. Traffic now uses 130 /132 street to access the entire . area west and north of Cascade View. 128th may be an option. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN This is the local access road. EXISTING LAND USE N/A NUMBER OF ACRES: N/A STAFF NOTES 1) The road is being used as a collector arterial; not a local access road, during the peak hour. Right of way width. is 60 feet. 2) Poor road characteristics include blind curves, steep grades, narrow travel lanes, no controls to slow down traffic, and no sidewalks. and 25 3) Access to the area west and north of Cascade View is . probably provided by 144th for north bound traffic, while 130 /132nd provides access to southbound traffic. • Cz .181N Sr ...... • • RIVER 7.111117 RIVER 1; • 01 .1 t.m ; G: iichit± Its -r - 6 1 DUWAMISH -"' ; ;•••••• t$1.4 sQ • 1••••-• - .4: - • 1' a CA•A lot 1 ••• -• . • . 1o00'. to. _ - - - . . •-•-••• • • • .•- 3 t W s-••-• ": - - - - - - ---..• ' • ••• . .... •• :1 7. t , \ LL,■._,/ 7. •;, \\ .•,?:.•:.: . 1 % '.‘, .• ..••• ' \ - \ 1r; • • r " • - l c • - • 1... - 7 7= •-ir,r-1::-.L. _„, \ ItaRciti,, - ` NiOles; •,, [-J3 '4 . .... "." 1,. • LI • .1i • :at • 1 I I • • • • •• , I 21 C •-• 49 . ;$7 .• • s • sr, • 1•2 • it i .-- ":::::, • , . V '7L'r, 1-.10•MJI 0 r, ..-_-_,,--- - l esiv. , : pi, .. . li ; 10 .0 \,.. ••••• • ., ....,./.'',P , ..e. I • . • %_.6 ..., '=--71 '6•''1\P‘ ,-,ti Ali. ,._ „;•••171, 2 ,,_,,,,,,,J,,,,, to •• 0 1 ' ' •„,..,- . \ I: ,.., ' • ,...- • ' .... . s •t• . •••' r5 21,7 2 ■ a s li' ' I C. , 6 '• 700,41 ; ; ;14 ';•2,•.; 1 • , PY. •.' • or,,c;.., t "fu.._____P-, • , .3 /AM S7 ,,,"...■ : , IV, •,u• t-,..- ,- Y:: X • ti,... 4 . r . •; ,,i 'l l" 6 . elj* .6:2&A .-- - F:4 • a •• 1:•••• Goo 1.•• • ° Z • . 7.. • • ••••• rfigi I • 14 ' _424114 sr 6 ,, • f ! I ". • • g. ; • n • 8. 2 \ •\ • • '= " A .• •i. • , • • e-C' .'"t A i"• • • '105 I. \Al ; . sis.-..:, • 4 0' •.:, ,r, ; 6 g 1 1: 36 -, r b 1:1Q dOCOM , 510 0 ' ■,. ..; • . -• - ,.., c .• •- • ..., \ ' '..rt.. . ...4-3._ , , • •• 1-.... ,;-, \-- • 0 . , t'. - -s :4, ; 4. 4 \ - ;-- - - . 4f!-- 4' '.., 0 65 • '5; 1. 't 6 C:I '0 1 \' - 5117i 1 / 4 7. • • z • -ii t f. '.' '''':'.. "7 13 • '' mi, • RIVERTON CREST ."''...?.:'. .. ..... - CiT4iTEAY ' • . 1-1- ti.,:--- .1. 3- ..d..... ' ',,-.0 " tit :- ..„ .......C.J ...." „II, 4:1; 1 , o„. 13, , .. " ' :'; ob , ....•• .'9, -tri o..r. • 7',.. '.. . : . ' .° , T.- -: - ..j '•1:i.,. , ,_,. o, ... _...._ .;: 11q7 - ft.' . .;;; - :.•,....CL k. . 4 101i .• 17:1 6. 71 • ,.• ..„.. 3 germ sr •'; Or -1 ,., , -..--.1 -.-;---- ---, -•••----.-;• ,•,_ , • -' C . " . 4 ' • 7 : ! rr r3 --- V ' ' 9 ' • . 7 -7.- ''' . c. •." -- '7: • •-•? .,!•1 € 4,7, , . n CS '. ' • ;•••• •-- • - ,..• , Cil - 'll ' + 1=1.'.' L.H .• ‘ • • P ” ' o . r■ . to C!, 4 • --'!', *J-. - 7 - .1 . e.. .-••---*:'• ' 4.-• • - ) . t ? 4- • . c a. 2. "; ,,, I ..4.:- .,. ..--,,, . .,b .; •o • . , -. ;, ... 2: . • . • • f __ ZATTLE .... 1 , 1•••••• "I/ 3 IIINO 37:,_,..." ' .. ...„ ...,, i : .,,,4 -- 4 f ,'- . ..:g s ,_ ,.:\ i i ek:\ , ; ,.. 1 ii,...o I ' ,;,,BK.5.` •1 -, 1 4) ,.. , •• 6 . tla ' P •• • i , j qo .1 W,‘ itY..,ii.: Ily, , • • 2A 1 . .... : ; . : ..:-. ni 141 ' t ' : I ■ 7 ..b : • . 4. o ' • 1 •W" . 4 4-'7- ' .; • ' . cli . 114-„,1.°4 ii ' ... \c - .,-.. 'us' , • :.5 .s.. • q• .'"••• l ' " - ' -.' ei n . c;' qii•Imiobi• • I Y . -'-' i. • *0 ■ 11 ' --- .. • 1-v7:S1;C:ft'''. ..,..,...A • at 'II 10' W. . ' it) ' . i•Ct;•_ '‘'.V.!!! ft.c:1;.' .6 , • • ' ..' , . ..,•„- • ro I i 1,...-0 • •• C...asp cc, t . Cb L ! .. c . Cl• Do 0 a 1 1., ; ; , ,,,A5g) .i.c .., , -, ....e,-i • ' 7 . ,. ....- cIT,.. . .". *. .0. ..p, ,... r.. • 1, ' ...', ■ .:1 I 7 ..al --7,-,-T-..-----4-j 0 dityC 4i) - A. dre.c: '. ... -r "1 . L • - s., yto Oe3c : 4tV, , ;G.. u gim . - f7 ........1. co ' ••• ...I 1 • • • -, . ' ... : Z.• ="t0. t 0 !; ,i l .:••1 . ... at ' 1 cti _L_, 1 •' .67. :•••:, -. 1to ' ; : . 1 ;: ' IL i'L • t p,,w• ,'..,;. •,, Jf= , .. .. ,. • - - .-... - • : • • 4 • n.; : ;111 ,- -. 71 : - . 17 - . , - LI.,-- 3 r■l • -, 7 .":;7 1 4': -. ::',.. Lii";.:f.;1••? - 4.. 1.....ct:3 : 7.- 4 7ii , „, t. 'COMMENT NUMBER TASK ' FORCE COMMENT Drop "Potential Zone" of RM 900 to RM 2400. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS7200 with Potential Zoning of RM 900-(Maximum Density.Multi- Family = 48 units /acre) /CF (Community Facility) EXISTING LAND USE Vacant wooded NUMBER OF.ACRES: 24.7 STAFF NOTES ' LOCATIONS . 'UMBER 5 1) This site is a series of wooded benches .(i.e. alternating steep and flat areas) . 2) Surrounding zoning is: RM 1800 (High Density = 24 units /acre) to the north RM 900 (Maximum Density = 48 units /acre) to the west and RS 7200 (Single Family = 6 units /acre) to the south and east. 3) The site standard zoning of Single Family at 6 units per acre; is much less dense than the RM 900 Potential Zone at 43 units per acre. 4) Dropping the Potential Zone from RM 900 to RM 2400 will reduce density from 48 units /acre to 18 units /acre. 111 " • ,; 0.61 Ac. PH A. 11) (2) ENEY 1.50 Ac. S.P 678102 tra Suss r T PL.e —; e e ')b. 131 O.AB6 c A � I 7p aye ` 13112 T.e179 4. • lJ 0.44 Ac. ,R9 *II — - _. - - • o axis g 131 b 1190 04 :13 2 R tt O 13 16 ,, .••• U t , ' n (I) R (2) $ 111 � W ® .57,14,0 . Q 132 E19232 tld.61 4 /33RD O SST ��� 165 1? + 7 75 50 i 100 I }! ° 4 \(f)17 0 ( n 1 M I O ( °' 1 111 I M n R 13 :'� " i N 4 1 ® X 1 1 n 8 1:.� �� Zyg1 r✓, 7�t fa J ��11....r�� i i N 111.'A 371 i L � I 11 1 tto Lad vs 3 15J • 113326 :1 d 441.10 1165 3 uss 1 t, „ t i t 73 or 3 ' 6 -- - - --- � ° 13))2 �`"1.�7D. nn • Q , In Reol Vf (#) X1012 a cr 1 (. 1 Cs b Cs /t. 14 :\ 47 11 •\*1 JCS,4 v 4 ti !r1 l I! \ 34.N 7 d. j! M 0.87 Ac 8TH • • • 1 1 3.S1 603 3/ /0 7l. JO :127TH . - • ▪ 340 J. H. GARDNER 2.0 A c 71 3d ( 71 1/7 4770_11) .flo PRQGRESSIVECARE INC 1 1 - 61/.4 Ac. `\ u 1 M t ■ vs 0 __ JII L.439 vPit 2 173: 61 11 16 7, t c ,COMMENT NUMB KR TASK FORCE COIN LOCATIONS W MBER 8 and 13 Existing drainage facilities are not adequate to carry away surface storm water. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A variety of single and multi-family zones north of 140th Street, EXISTING LAND USE Various NUMBER OF ACRES: N/A STAFF. NOTES 1). Existing storm facilities are all open ditches except along Highway 99 which has enclosed drainage which has enclosed drainage, 2) Not all roads have drainage ditches. 3) The Riverton Hospital and Riverton Convalescent Center own large wooded, vacant parcels (Comments 5 and 2) which provide significant runoff detention. Development of these parcels will require extensive storm water detention facilities. 4) Tukwila plans to establish a storm water utility (tax) similar to King County, to build runoff collection and removal facilities. .1 FIVE 1r lir ...,,,•••• ii, . iir'f.• • •-,!;. •-'• ' .iWila Vi 17.1,..4r il,..10.N. _ -...71/1■117, -,.-- • ItOW --s— *7 „ S 3.1 WAS ri r I 1 RivER •••••••• • • * ••••.= '" • . .0" • 410 171$4 aAr uriz Th• • riell3h 6 = • 1.• F 4-P • &D. 1 5 1n F ; 6• 4 1 , r 9 ; . 0 n .i•• ,1.0' \ r1. 4.• .5/•• • •'• • • • :••• I:1 •. 0 '31 • .\ I* • • •.B • • • i -.0 cvoovri? tg•si - — , • •• i••••■• " 1,0 u - ",a041,6if T 9 .• • L : r: • • • f• - • r: t•t.",i)e"..- • • ".. -.'• • • - • .....••••■ ; - • • D e• . • F .444 • ! 1 • - A rzt iri . , • a • LI iiA -:. - - ' • 11 I • t• 14 •:•• I Fit 8 1 1 :. 1* Q •• • "b • 4 :31 43 .7 • : - 1 • 1 .c? - 1:• - * • Fl , • u. • Cr-- • Ft • tal 141 - 1 : 1 FL r o n ' ; .. .1/t - SiC. . :Lyn ; .:15 go - . • • r itd..0. 6 - qal •0 .s., , , J. , _1_ •1-• ::; : 1 .5 9, e..... • 4. Fll 1 ;:a .0, . " ( ---• 1 2 ?''' , pqier-Zi4 Q. 4 .. ki 6. • i '..:,., ; f= ! O 7 L _ t_..,......•• ,..,,---- 1 9.,55- : :: .......• [;;] .'- '3,i ; b' i.ITL.1 - .17, °- - .. El. ' / ;•*'(:) iir±f.' c , - • ••••••• F. -. G •-• th [ C :sz ? r '9 • A 7 t _ • • t• < 40 ; .. L Z ; ; 75 1] 4 •-••"t . • : .1 7 (1. 4 0 c c CO**1ENT NUMBER 7 TASK FORCE COMMENT Vacate the indicated alley. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN N/A EXISTING LAND USE N/A NUMBER OF ACRES: N/A STAFF NOTES 1) LOCATION C BER 9 Lots served are zoned RS 7200 (Single Family) on the west and RD 3600 (12 /acre) on-the east (see Comment 8 for proposed down zone to RS 7200). 2) Alley vacation would be reasonable if all adjacent areas were single family. 4 0 � Di7 ti +: f t/ to r OV. At ▪ i K• �i f f o rte• ' 1 Wig CA •S I CO )sct u � or N w � ur;/ orr oc I ( -A --C —` 1 —17.1 I r, 11 PP b' i 1 7 j iI[� flc � 4 L �f r I e ,°d • �ar,l1aw�ra. - , - ! ti �, o I 4 _ it 2I - 0 a o f1 iF r1 ,! > v o ‘� _ h I 9 r Y 1 1b • Y in =v rv/ i a - -- oar 1 r. �,� 0 57 1 1 7V 5f 0 0 /or? PR'G9� � 1 v5 so 37. S 21i m /r/ 1! v n. r, nr ors tP � n� is) c •r — i ff — -.:: - ' °76/ Fr/ / o 1 :/I4 s2441" 01 0 �� I ` - �Si b L1 - IV/E0 •, a C � 11 11 F ' 4.1 C 60 So I `: d q — 1� L - - L� z.: (CI vo. I nc+ +r ` � Z� g '4 1 11 C21 49 1 iJ • cue z ti41 m — x I w Cttli# . v ,✓ 7! r 0 /lt J t!, ._ ; v tN r+ r• r::�`� r ii 441 � :r'', - -i A ; 111 v P. O A z ,•) . / n, 3 Yv oo, 4 PO err JPh'. ,1 C 00 3 } VI/ • /a/' Y t) 9 er • i ' I f •• -i '(4' I/ S f Z ■ ,. .a 122f1 0 A y j 1 n 1111 N , C • - ▪ 1 lr� s� 1 I , ( 01 12 Of 10 JS an LTD fraytun 1 /6 /9, \ V 1 ` -- -s'L 081 rE r;Q r . � .� -s ;i/ • � � �� ' s. . -- - - -6 b > v , 4% a VI • S (CbVM wOSd r'MYS) T. ) r rn r. aJ Ml.o u i � a � or ' «� r6 4 1 ' DI w 1 Iv L It � ps a,• of n► : v.. 1 (35/... __•_ 51-- 'WI ZZ ▪ G, gf 6 EL `v 0 6EPZIQ sI 1 s7 .,. . o1a,1 ;? 1 ... A ^ Ft ?p 99 rP vv I rrn (t1 fr7 • y 11ZS, ts Nall F.f •. "' 1,,01 � t 1 11 9 (� t09z1 11Lyl11 - tZ 9/ /7 vr%— 4 (1241 f � • - - - 4, •., Z MIDI N1" I D C 1 '� U-- o ,, Z Z '1 1' 1 4' H ►r • ccdap 11 01 1S L �� GC o ZE921 I - S2 3 _S SIE:1 bC - II °' —, O6/ 9 • p � V _ I CI i M N (1 1 or- 61 OZ • _ S 4 SiF'1 IZ - -7 ZZ CZ ti. ,a�p:11 V"' I -_�/.•(.$2�� • S`_. v fir ,Ya�//y r 4. N to 131.1111°Z1 \ 1 ., . % _ _ .. .__ 40 1 .r , :it 1 M In liCly. �'° _— j_1t'i O f r'• O 0 or f S tit r r . Ot i$ $, co Eft 20HI1KNT NUMBER a LOCATION "'FIBER 10 TASK FORCE COMMENT Rezone from RD 3600 to RS 7200. This comment is only partly applicable due to a zoning map error. Only the northern three lots are zoned RD 3600. The remaining lots are zoned RS 7200. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RD 3600 (Duplex, 12 units /acre) /SF (Single Family) EXISTING LAND USE Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.22 (9,600 square feet) STAFF NOTES 1) Surrounding zoning is BN on the east, and single family in all other directions. L) Np lex zoning of these lots at the block tip closest to Highway 99 may provide a feasible access solution by requiring all lots be served by a joint southern access onto 33rd or 34th. 3) Rezone would•reduce maximum densities from 12 units /acre to 6 units /acre. A M 135 .-- q 5 Is 14 _ 1 . gr .9' 4' tn ,• 0 � Io 1 r 99 1 ri NO J r .. " N 6J r i.445.y.9 J w /1 90 4 12803 1 75 2 131 Tr IR1 3 ®13335 ao •��A E 0 N I 1 %1 10 i �l33ts L7 red a 35 a 1 !o iiu J lci'= i N r 1 0 10 0 14s /o n ,f0 el., JO /1 /4 71.101 (1 ) h ti r— -�• ♦ r, e1 O(/ a• rsh n 124 88 74 0 0 13271 0 a,1G r/ /4J r 03? AC 0n,,11 1 /0 /80 133 4 11:0 h 471 ion Jr . »417;7/Jf - 0 30 h(,_ /eJ 010 6 9. 1014 4 s 13 17 0w339 El • 14 •r_ vcr- 110 , 1:8 0:4 23 s; ry� 22 12411 21 C hits 20 19 19 0 x• 112• b: ' ' u_ -I I 1� ;� — :A14 V j 5' , M1zs' 1. w 6 /90 Iz63z S V 4 51 5 fl IJ I� ;211 • ' 12 !,1 1 l df ' /35 1 I, 401 I 19 ' L 49, �'M N - 1 4 MI S o 92 /14. 3 . .... ...iii ST 4 3 20, , 13 , 39 /1w„� c COMMKNT NUMBER 9 , LOCATION OMER 11 TASK FORCE COMMENT Rezone•RM 1800 /HD (High Density Multi- Family = 24 units /acre) to RS 7200 /SF..(Single Family = 6 units/acre). KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM 1800 /HD (High Density Multi - Family); EXISTING LAND USE 50% vacant and 50% single .family NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.6 acres (say 28,000 square feet.) STAFF NOTES 1), Single family zones lie to the east, west and southwest. Neighborhood business and multifamily zones lie to the north and southwest. 2) The down zone would reduce maximum density from 24 units /acre to 6 units/acre. 4' 1 "+,,1V 09 0 • VI o id. 9 1 , 9/ 00J IQ S s Oi P T 9 e Ef L e S b ti "1 R , L Ct .t •i::f lkl,' of I�f. � .' 4 1 4.11:1 I I 1S. . r,s 2,3,,,14/ • IJt9t1 �" 9 X9211 ti — G6/ - -- 9 6 ± =d6/— — - S2 S I0, j1 S j7 11 ' E I ZI m 4. r 91 LI ° ov;.1 1 v 1' �I o 91 ng� fig '� VI c.' b1 1 ■ Ir .St1l • ,•• „Ei 02 1 �i - 2I ' a 1._.___.: LI Mt n� 1 Sit 9[1 •4"14' 112£1 61 IZ Col I o�Tl — 1 , o IC0 O\ 1 , ~ i n N ° S 1 % t Z5 I T !! ' . ! . ( ;.b, - ° 1 ..(-'ti� ' 1 "el /0/ C/ 7/ 0 ti w J -J (OV•'.' 3 0 5 1 S2E5 0l 4 w 09 I o,■ IA 1 ( 1) , , - u . 0r r S �o,v 6£11''7/ I I r - -� I L il — 1 0 I X1 of r rrriury+"' bbI ')NI 7V b 0 7. i1314021V9 •H •f ,COMMENT NUMBER iS TASK , .FORCE COMMENT.. 37th Avenue intersects Highway 99'and 133rd Street at a dangero.us angle: Some improvements. should be made': ,KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN " OCAT ION NUMBER 12 N/A EXISTING LAND USE N/A NUMBER. OF ACRES: N /A STAFF NOTES 1) None at thls time. VA 4 • I c . • i7 • • N I0 (2) J7 0 U '^$ 132 /r Mr //J rr III 6J4 00 /00. 06 4 • V. It ZJ.' 'I /rid; 1(056 • • 333 I', \ 14 04 /00 el» o 03)A u�i 11 /rJ „ 4 1r /J/ no 035 AC /81et' • II.4SJ 13 O ho l /44 / • 37.23 I 3_f7 377. l6ai. l 8 -t 7 16 ' IS; itgiti J7 51331 377.r 47 1 : I rr • • 133 Y) C5 � 13' 1 40 JI 1 7 /37TH \ . • 4 , B 4. 1 .71 1 4• )12 \1 M . (SAMPSON ROAD) t.. 2• III 12, 3.' Il F m5 .t1L • © a 6 7 . 323 ig• 1111111 . FO v 1' _ •r �l 10 • • 2 co 111 - L 1 2C� 'I IS Inu II • • u ' ST J. • A g • • II re ar r.. Idle .7 14 L i 0 60 A(2. o ^J 4 . µ4T2 -4 - - 1j'/ 6iQ! 4 7 • • 1I.d 6 y o ' 57",:: 1 1 5 6c $0- S a n 13. \88 US I /9 ! 124.1 f 0 2 20 14 15 ►" 13. [itnn . 1B 4 1 8 P1. :I® 5 17 • 6 16m C % 7 4 I i . 1 ,11 9 13 :: .1 I eJ I • .4r 10� i J L f I ?{.:>t • 33 !141 oI 39 v OBI 11 O 9 4 •- _ - _ - - - - l '•••• - •,iAtl---,�a w" I h :I III 1 'r o ti - -- -ti les I 1' 64 1S 28 � L',: i1 r, l rio i SA wArfO ,ANA 1 h 1 t G so (3 7. 1 , •7 ■ Imo. W cottl 11 1 I 1 40 •, ti {Rli 112344 - _ T . 14 yoe 712 I I A 1 1 1 I ',Il') A I i 1 1 • • AvIS 1' T 4 - E COL SQUA , A'CUN ST MOP 5 h \ `i1 • 1 \ \ • 4u i \ 1 1 \ \ \I 0 .0 3' R a '4 'OI LatC f�,I.o 45.44' 3 12 64: I: /36TH 4.67 AC 10 '►OS1'AC / 4 / /6J //o 60 74 /AA QG /1700 1334 1 - • r; o .1.'01 lr /Jrf u IV • • 17 ■1 ST: Gov't Lot 4 39 Acres 11 II ,T III 3.! 37 36 I L�/ � 35 1111 ti - ' '1'' ` '7 . 4 ; �ct,4 . S� . v ;, }4 I3I 1�1 • 5 • R /0. • 131 1 30T1 1 r, 1s-- 1 3 N 1 I II 1 .6 • N SAM# 13 %i -- 1 - .v ns NJ 10 COMMENT NUMBER TASK FORCE COMMENT A total lack of sidewalks makes pedestrian travel dangerous. This is especially serious on streets around Cascade View Elementary School, and along Military Road where cars use the paved shoulders as a passing lane. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN N/A EXISTING LAND USE Surrounding land uses are predominantly single family. Streets have no sidewalks and often have open ditch drainage. NUMBER OF ACRES: N/A STAFF NOTES LOCATIONSe 7UMBER 14 and 22 1) Sh ldf:r , on Military Road have been paved and striped, Wt. are now often used as passing lands; endangering pedestrian. Paving a wide shoulder may have thus increased the level of pedestrian hazard. 2) Almost all local access roads are 60 feet wide. 3) Open ditch drainage tends to force pedestrians onto the paved road area. \\\ \\\-\;::..; ° o ' a o a o 71 t , I .4- 0 ego •d 67 -- IYNO ST , 7 ^f' 1 'rl l . .4 i I' • ' i. ' • : \,, ,- I , : ' "� , t-_-1 ; 'r I 2777.;"1—.L—...c;-7;-.1-11. ,�mot I] 1 O� —�"LCf I;nc)1:`'!It: s *— s TM t r.�',, �� \: . ,ti �41 • ;o6 S� j tom } .� •ti; r1 1 4,i0611 : .. - r - I....." I y W.. v.„./ . I , , �7 I =� ' 11 •'',: � . �°-` • �` , m `,. p • ■ ��i .: �_�4�'� dredP..,••, � .3 h� '-'� 'I o 1 . � . ' 13 n•t 3 a 'i: -„ or I ' :.. �' ~�• -. •.,.- ,Ut ® i .;{� • \ .1 . 1 •- , I q ' `.: t L1 ri' e1 .. 7i •:�-. ;'' othe,'qnn,iliveic"1191 '• - 4 D I • 737TH .VTN • 57 • Q:: -• •� swim., A ON CHEST CS: ?, .i ME7•E Hr 3 , vt b tu. i =d • " l p. • "= - ; dt =2 �d .. _ ' •'� Rio' ,lT , . . t 7 - 4 -_2— •{ ' • . a .' !7-a i +1]3 .:�,..•; 7 o l'. 5 !- 8 �'• rl . ._ . . '1 : •O - . ... "3i ,.. i , r U - < l f CQ� `9 cp01 0 , R±po' c7 r 7WID6''I�on 40 0 r. s. I� o ., ;a 5 i = fi de s.,r r { {{ � : , � , ; r :,0 1; o f . ° ! r • ` 1 ' ' 71 '1.4 ' 1 1 ° (� , ., W IF•Y, 1_ "1 . x:12.-- ] •• . 1 i •- . , •W V'. 1 - , D ••8 0 I ,,M' -J t ` � � . � c, • - • H ( • • 7 . mow - - i • }' . . , 1 ` - ! ' n ♦ } .• ..�. � 0 • .rr r! 1 ' : '�! i j r. &x:,1 I ` i sig.�4 " t .. 4 s h la'f m p • o p 1 II t' ' � 83 b ,O s ..1 • Iti asT � ;7 " .. s •• •7' __ .... :3 ... : IQ 1, :,.6 05 I N � • ..0 ADS' N 1 Q ' tj `-- rF -,� b 0 1; Q. . K r ; rl �St ,. • `�• :.! ' w . .) II s" : g GI cal © B O • • cal i4 ' J I �' t_.i -- "'� 1 -• " •l 7 '�''• f,6 ;b4. i -� Wiling TR1ACT:{ ] , d_ � f[y e:',..,... � 11 � � � t ,! 1 I ,;.,■ , i I ._� (nt 4 t COMMENT NUMBER 1 TASK FORCE COMMENT Close /vacate alley. escape.. LOCATION `SBER 15 It is now used by vandals and criminals for KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adjacent properties are RS 7200 /SF KXISTING LAND USK Adjacent land use is single family. NUMBER OF ACRES: N/A STAFF NOTES .1) There is no public or, private alley.shown on the King County Assessor's map. (SW- 15- 23 -4). This supports a conclusion that no alley exists except at the pleasure of. the'adjapent property owners. • 1 4 *= • Y i I r - t t - — T n,s 7 1 I 3 I r ,� l rte _ a 1,2 ti 0. -s - - - - 14 i - "'• 111 cr) ,o. „, � OEL£ zs Q v d ]LZ ` 9 34 J 1 13 d/ n 4 e1,1 /l/1/ 5b 061 AC t, 71 //! 1' 1/ c 0/ 0 3 9 r /sf v 14111. =/i rZ9-y /50;:' 140 3 2 9) , SS .c7 7/ e.)/ u44 AC /! Id eoz . 13 24 1311. It /55 14016 ,.I,p 13C`AC 1)3 H 10/ /c / �14ft 31 AC �• 11...__15 /! v 140!. / 7 I � A j re 5/ O 4 1, A( . 046 AC / rot ,9 11 //7.t 0I41,:5 /! e/ Y /! /10 14103 b 1 1 MO ►� u , A COND 7/ // J1! 1.16 AC [34 65 139TH. /04 46 . 4 .• • 6 • ; 14 u 'ti - �� 5 1 13 a N,. :.1 Zio • ✓ •0 �f E•3 •3 s• 4 •es V35TH iljl I `1/ 11 A ° , r:^'" ) • E _ J • �to 1 — h /! 1J/ 1 ' 1 .. /16.55 ST �2 .-11 \I 5` _23 13 24 1311 1 1 1 • 26 27 ,,113 a7 ,d 13;4' 1 !;!0 . N 1 I, L SAM .1 -" :.. I Fri �.l r , r. n r.r .,r. ,.,r 4 ; : ' 136 r 16 8 ( '; +9 13 / 142ND PL. r rod 0? AL 7 e V 11 1t J.1 Je3 lS S o AC. // 55 r /.) ! '34 ti N r i!,10'3 01 1 1 I - \ Goa �� \ - 1, 1 14 /7e '.1 I9 143 I '. I L Vo'o - _IC.l, IIS7A A e r i Y „ APIS ,^ EMI COL SQUA MINIUM 61 UVITS Cr 21 I . ' I 90 I rr,.f0, en ( NORTH ST )S (sourH sr) eE 1 . a 142'0 ._..- r u � r t u 3? AC •44 // 10 // /51 ° 040 AC c) iud 16 4 \ ,! I _ ^ ' 6 I 60 1 1 1 1 , I I !Jo „ 14 /ST 142ND X10 1 00 n�T ST 1 b y ( v 0 7506 6 • 2 7 4 4 e A E 30 1/ e (JUNCTION S7 ) A vJ h1 , /00 u 14.19` (1 11 : KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN_ `RM 2400 /RR (see above) EXISTING LAND USE LOCATION !r BER 16 Single family with one, 4 -unit apartment building. NUMBER OF ACRES: 1.8 STAFF NOTES C MMENT NUMBER 1 • TASK FORCE COMMENT Rezone RM 2400 •(Medium Density Multi - Family = 18:units /acre) /RR (Residential- Retail Mix) to RS 7200 (Single Family = 6 units/ • acre) /SF (Single Family). 1) Surrounding tg zoneing is RM 18e000 (24 units/acre) to south, single family (6 units /acre) to west and north, and General Commercial to the east. 2) Location of Highway 99, 170 feet to the east, puts mid and long -term stability of single family uses at this site in question. F0 ,o ,1 D] I: ®i> 1 1 Oa I •V ti ST cAt 1' l r , 131 A 11 X1 1'0? ol 4r 14103 v , A'COND ORTH ST) .IA 1 J C) I 112 14118 3,9 ,1 i . A u S 1JUNC ►ION ST 1Z1 s v141ST 9 4 3 4 — 5 '6 �� 7 —8 ) 14 13 °0 12 .1 11 10 G, ADV,1_,,,,---- C6 t ioo 14 '41 � I �..V 6 w 041AC \'/ 0•4AL M n 0 40 40 --- 6 • f 46 � i r1 10;A. .`. I./IU N, N 140 S A M w P f.1 1E10 04VE AC 411'4 INC 4 M1 1/ /JS 31 AC ' p f[ /61 ft /60 b 140 3O AC 0I4123 !l / /11 /9 I ft 3/ f[ //o ., '.1 14 0 ti C 114 46 At 1 / 9J , xh '[ , o Il I... d bb 00 ! 3d M ti /3J )" 0 0 46A 65 ' it /J3 loe f[ //4 3 1N 1'i3 ^' 142ND PL. 4 o. !11 0 SO AG. 11 35 c'!3 1v- -T '1 /34 1/5 A 44 S6`n ti '4 14 118/ Y1 u 103 UZI AL /1 dJ 14 8 • T)iE COL -J V 1 SQUA MINIUM 61 U417S 9A Jl /[ / 0 40 A(. ,(,0 .)O — ToF. e -1 I 1.16 AC 14251 t(1e6 • -.. l/4-4-7-/4-4-7-16- ' YY/11 I J /VA 10.; i ss : 65 60 p•• � ,"�'[ se t ` 4 I I I 03 AC. 0 ” X10 /00 I I 1 30 b, a, v J7 r - - 1` p N :12 4 i p 1 o is 45 ° vo • ' ' J ^ 60 11 i3 • 10 u 9 1 ;151 0 139TH. ST !J \ \ \ \ A E. AN'I R5 • INC n d (� u r' 3 7 ` n A� , s 11 • N' /1 d C{:L� ST) HUBNER 8140 1 19 AC. 0 1 VAC S !GARDEN P /JS 15 4 I ;18 6 2 :'f I7 16 3 1 .. 1 ! -1 16 1' 122 4 • 15 Ott Al v 7 v /« 3 5 H 14 91C r 1 11/. ELM /1 /l9 If S 4'I( NORMAND r I ( z) e 122 a N11l8 lc 41 COMMENT NUMBER 14 f TASK FORCE COMMENT LOCATION ER 17 Rezone CG (General Commercial) /HC (Highway Commercial) to RM 2400 (Medium Density Multi- Family) /SF (Single Family). KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CG /HC (see above) EXISTING LAND USE Single family residential. NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.6 (26,000 sq. ft.) STAFF NOTES 1) Highway 99 lies 60 feet to the east, across a commercial property. 2) Zoning.to'the north, east..and south is commercial, and multi- family the west. The western property is . under consideration for down zoning from RM 2400 to RS 7200. (See comment'13) • en 1�J C ^ 14 \IZ N 14118 r L1 t Q t t 1- u ■ Z 9 A S � / S t# S � 14 -46 -- 41 • 14 L97 No r • 05 Mt rs, cr) p., oo. „. I L tl ■ f? i ?I. J I. d ®L£ a 9 /4 / 4/ 1 13 '! III • 0 d/ 86 5 24 _ 134 23 I3 22 13A .,1 D 3 (1) 3 5 44 AC14019 4 1? 1 0 .14, M C M C A • r I 1 �� j t) 6C 1 71'.71 4 , A S• . I38TN MINIUM 6i usiiTS 3? M. 84 11 /0 +M P %D e 61 ° t.0 ^IJ1 o a 1.16 AG ,! ,1t 04; AC 11. 14 21 ' 12 11 I0 71 041 10446 0 ,nJ 5 ' f Hs (GAROE_N P N $T iJJ 1)1® 11 )4 1 ' ®1 6 2 17 '-:Si 1G 3 1 .,-+ I6 1S cI ® •151312 . 131 ; 5 614 131'7 s 1I� 142 , l � 11 4 - - 1-11JI3NER 13110:1 1 !9AC. 13903 A CON° I fi.D1�T.T 14135 3 d/ //9 103 ? 1 AL 14 14 14 14103 /.9 / A 60 1413 ! ifs 1410 dJ ti V W153 ^; , PL . 143 / // ,1 /1. /J 14 331 14.337 It /d,. I( /86 14 341 m JO Nig L (NORTH ST), 06 ? 142 A P. 11+ is ., 14 218 �n ? ' 164 °R pf/ " O N4 A / 9 I I 14 24 '' r A A ;04 /s1 0.40 AC n 16 4 /4 /ST N 60 0 �T „ " 71 de I o 441 I.0 3 AC. k'as r z/z a6 1 A " ff0 /03 it l s , c► to ns� 1 A \ ti 1 0 � 1 /00 SOU ST 404 100 ''C A _ ) /00 41 L r jii r a L �I s 0 11 1 0, / 11 C DONATION CLA /M N! 37 // J • ' 0118 AC M . u 0 J0 o� 0 \eRK 57'1 `I \\ II \\ 1! \\ If 1` \\ I'° a A E. AN INC.. 1 1 1 q AL l i t 1 i 44— I (JUNCTION 57)o vI UST ST h /e6 Al 3 T�E r/ /3/ ELMER HOWLEY V 01 1, 41 et? 1s : 60 60 95 COMMENT NUMBER 15 TASK FORCE CO[*1ENT Keep RM 1800 (High Density Multi- Family = change: Comprehensive Plan designation from Multi - Family) to:CF (Community Facility): buf:fer.between highway commercial uses and the west. 'KING COUNTY ZONING/COMPREHENSIVE-PLAN RM 1800/HD (see above) EXISTING LAND USE Mixed single and multi- family uses. NUMBER OF ACRES '3.1 STAFF NOTES 24 units /acre), but HD (High Density,, This is to create a single family uses to 1). A Community Facility designation is usually given to parcels which are the identified sites for a non - profit community facility such as a church, recreation center, or water reservoir. 2) Tukwila's P -0 (Professional Office) zone is a buffer zone based on its landscaping and design review requirements; as well as the pattern of low activity during evenings and weekends. .1 ' 38 39 s 41 I4d 6 . 10 5 18 /54 / ri /o4 0 6 14131 9, 7 ••)7 11 SO 121 5P 1082 67 1 II.SJ 'n ttil AC1401%, .14 103 .% 7 f. • RTH ST) 2 3 0 22l' 1 21138 2 I- U 3? AC •d34 /0 1 I •• 1 0 1 .30 fen 00 1.16 AG ero e3.3- 111'1Voi• I 4 3/ 'le )14 - S A A AP" LO 01 INC -21:1 A i C . 4t.r.co iro eo 3 1U I e () AL ? Se 1 0.5 0 AC. it .93 74•7 1.304 7 1 11d 14 m 157 143 14 331C : re. /17 0 4 SQUAIE1:4.b MINIUM 61 UVITS A o 1 11 60 6 F r - 1/4 T, 18 I 03 AC.. " 14251 - etz ad 110 /00 ,•? ° i•• /00 LICO, 4.. t 5 56 1311:1 ...trt 1' rti. 1 1 15 ' 14 • 1 , ) 4 X ..- . 3 ' 14 ..11' If/ el 4 led 46 ' 400 ••• 03 AC no • VAC S GApOEN P 41 . 131 - 136 II ST %WO 2 :117 16 3 t ivr1 I 6 C GI 4 .1513E 5 6 1437E 6 122 14! 7 • 010 /43. • I 139TH. ST RK ST I \\ \\ \\ \\ - E. AN 47 , I ( 3 \ l,t1 At L) 1 10 / IJUNCIION ST1'4' c' 1ST ‘.1.4 -r 6 1 n. 4 AL .44? /0046 ,05 -L 0 4 A 1 HUBNER 13110!. 1 1J AC. 0' 11 1 041 I t 3E _Loris 76.11 a 74 44 Sal - 46644 14424 • k, 3 15 %; .."'" 16 c 1 i• ; 11.4; Al 11 /1Y It el /ex AT 1- /11 3 /Ai 11 /3/ LLMER 1 0i P-- NORMAND CI 10 17 c A C( I r .z tin ' I 1: ®i9 v ., 0 v 1 13! .... . WE 12 ;9) I ON „, 1 14 13 An 59 4 3 .. r .. .1 ' 38 39 s 41 I4d 6 . 10 5 18 /54 / ri /o4 0 6 14131 9, 7 ••)7 11 SO 121 5P 1082 67 1 II.SJ 'n ttil AC1401%, .14 103 .% 7 f. • RTH ST) 2 3 0 22l' 1 21138 2 I- U 3? AC •d34 /0 1 I •• 1 0 1 .30 fen 00 1.16 AG ero e3.3- 111'1Voi• I 4 3/ 'le )14 - S A A AP" LO 01 INC -21:1 A i C . 4t.r.co iro eo 3 1U I e () AL ? Se 1 0.5 0 AC. it .93 74•7 1.304 7 1 11d 14 m 157 143 14 331C : re. /17 0 4 SQUAIE1:4.b MINIUM 61 UVITS A o 1 11 60 6 F r - 1/4 T, 18 I 03 AC.. " 14251 - etz ad 110 /00 ,•? ° i•• /00 LICO, 4.. t 5 56 1311:1 ...trt 1' rti. 1 1 15 ' 14 • 1 , ) 4 X ..- . 3 ' 14 ..11' If/ el 4 led 46 ' 400 ••• 03 AC no • VAC S GApOEN P 41 . 131 - 136 II ST %WO 2 :117 16 3 t ivr1 I 6 C GI 4 .1513E 5 6 1437E 6 122 14! 7 • 010 /43. • I 139TH. ST RK ST I \\ \\ \\ \\ - E. AN 47 , I ( 3 \ l,t1 At L) 1 10 / IJUNCIION ST1'4' c' 1ST ‘.1.4 -r 6 1 n. 4 AL .44? /0046 ,05 -L 0 4 A 1 HUBNER 13110!. 1 1J AC. 0' 11 1 041 I t 3E _Loris 76.11 a 74 44 Sal - 46644 14424 • k, 3 15 %; .."'" 16 c 1 i• ; 11.4; Al 11 /1Y It el /ex AT 1- /11 3 /Ai 11 /3/ LLMER 1 0i P-- NORMAND CI 10 17 c A C( LOCATIONS '[BER 19 and 20 COMMENT NUMBER 1 TASK . FORCE COMMENT Remove the "RM 2400 Potential" Zone. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS 7200 with RM 2400 potential /SF (Single Family) EXISTING LAND .USE Single f tally NUMBER OF ACRES: 15.8 STAFF NOTES 1) RM 2400 Potential allows development to 18 units /acre . without any rezone action; even though current. zoning is for single family uses. 2Y. Surrounding zones are multi - family (24 units /acre) to the' south,and east, and,single family to the north and west. "1 33 AC. 1 1.1 , e96 !l. // ." } '}410 • N 144 10 e1 S de— ( 1390 - � /•7 _ ▪ 1421,, 113'0 •• r J A e r J SS P y FIELD DI;VEI INC • . /s/ 20 ,e ms 5 201',A 19 ►y1:J 7 11001 • ►y 9 171543 II , � I I I 90 a 1,1(1 J0I (NORTH STS: 044 A(,I40i9 r�---1� !1 /67 /t /■(0 _ — . 0 Eh 611 AC D1•1I: 140 ',tt 11 / 11.' /r_ ___ ILI -- 11 ,/- It //o •, 14 Q v ` ( / r .1.■ I! e/ _ 71 //9 U 3 3 ( ) ' i3 U ?!AC ! Tee 1 r d4 - s0 A fit ]► /►'fi ...nom 142ND s \ _ 19 Is�ir-' u� 142 6 At/ 60 /0 Id 0 :\ Ir1 I r� •• I6! r 1 6.5 16 K14406 `: 1 1 r I� Lt' iA en , S. 1<. yt LOND. It .Cu .S 7 3 y r, V 1 � 1 L 1 3.119 :> ea .4 I 60 /26 _• rtr 30 II1,IS lr —1 ,9ri 4rD 39 01.'b 9 tb 10 27_ 12 25 131' 1 ' 13 24 . 134 106 14 23 1 3) CI 404 '.1 • - 1 •' el; 1 0 6,, .1 I4446 I 1 I mian - - i ' ulv' L t i -i l° 7C /rn . I * .� fro' •• r V. k 41.54' • ti 143 ` !r //f // /A/ 14331 0331 M !t id.S�t�" !/ /ers 1434* p. 5 0 tp,„x n eJ .,Ti 7 / ,� r 1 rr. • r [Dr _ 1411‘1S I c _ e r - tri '^ 1 C 911�{C\ It• 1 fro 02 1 1 , 0 ` ` 1 1 I t I I 1 111 A P7 1 i 1x 11 lief O 41 ( .44 /46TH -" 0,0 El 1 1.1601 . w , 60 A .4 "1 A ,M T 0 N 1RAC1 9 ,_3 -•TRAC L)� 141ST •— . eB s 4 .11. 1 I 03 AC. µ '." `1+14251 e6 rikir i3 COMMENT NUMBER 17' TASK FORCE COMMENT Rezone RM.1800; Density.Multi- Family = 24 units /acre) /HD (High.)ensity Multi - Family) to RS 7200 /SF (Single Family= 6 :.units /acre). KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RM 1800 /HD (see above) EXISTING: LAND USE Single family. NUMBER OF ACRES: 1.0 STAFF NOTES 1) Surrounding area zoning is Multi- Family (24 units /acre) on ".. the south and west, Community Business to the east and . single family to the north. "LOCATION `FR 21 2). All surrounding uses have been developed per zoning. 3) The stability of these five lots as a single family area, when surrounded by higher density uses, is questionable. 4) Significant lot consolidation is required for a successful multi - family project. 1 L ' ` J . .Yri 0 j 7 � ✓" 4/4-/- " i ` '1 9 r 1 e- 5 1 1 a 14 ;^, N 1 DO. 1 I3 d/ 6 IL 81/ 1144 AC elo 19 —711 I6 _ a/39e 1^ 14216 ° I/r i h II eV/ M' lr n 1 ' ^ ' J 44 0 7/I sA J Il.lr I A er I /6.dJ t . FIELD DI�VEI • 4 /s/80 I 481 142ND PL. 4 I!O r /03 U eV 1 / 1/3 0.56 AC. IL .93 e /.? NAY /1 194 ST r r1r 4 I4)/ 14 0: 461f •63 '43 13 351 ®15 ' )3' 1,1 at Li II II/ l 1( //6 A 6,, t V 1 1 .5 t /40 .,;• 1 0 s - t /.99 /5081 40 35 AC� /13 140M h I 158 AC. 1 041 AL 140 I'L cO/ r4 (3 1 AL 14 zz 1 t4 P4 t „9i1H S.W MTH So f. COND..!' CON) r. 14 76 3 [ r 1 ] 11 w_r �l =: 1 4 ) _ 144/'61 , I OZES I _. 11{ilaCJy O 0 40 f rho 1 - I /06 • 6(1 C ®1 1 - ' ' I 1 'o. ; /88 e !! /J1 y (11 II ( SP 1082p67 .49 1/ 55 •1 0.44 AC14OI qr 11 i 130 AC v /1 /e/ 1 1L ( / 14 103 V 31 AC f N o /L /61 11 MO v 3A AC !L / 1� ,] y • 14 `"' 04bAC Q V /93 / `p _ r . 44 /9/ / ! (. S6`1 It /O4 " ! ' 1 L ll = a L ; ti o 0 4611C�j4131 0 (mo 5e •.3 � In 3 56 / / �95 /5 vl rny )4I ti 6, /10.1 _....t. 0 046AC 04411.3 /I '/ II I/O v 1 1 "' 90 60 I." (NORTH STS: (SOUTH ST S e6 1 - - 142 r3 ' 1 ►� ✓ 1 � . r 14 21b 864 ° M I + � • w o M} 14 24 /if . 61 1 id - +r0 . /O I �) //o I i I t ��, , ° r ' I 1 17 .4 ,1 • 14654 /46TH 60 •)5 77 lr. • 1 i � 11 1 1 !tom M 1/w Iw • i I I., { r L� 146 I cn (t ?ft AI ■ _. ■ • w• I I j : . 1 j I - I 1 14 01 J. E. DI1 1 Z" 1 _.__ 1 1 I 9 ,r I 1 9 6 1 j.Ad tl e r I I I f, I S I I t ` i q \ I I I ' ! °�II�,� 10 \ \ ° t ° I I b ^ , 1 1 I V t r d 1 I K' l r t 1 • i (k IL 1 10 1 l: /n 1 Iv l'' 2341 r W Iv O . v IL 'v r � 2 it I f • `t /,n p . . it i 1 / I I T ` I R I I 1 1 0 ` 1 L,Arr /) 1 i I I 1 I / we . r/.' l l.y .1 4 x4.4 1 r ,07R r - 1 U J l 1 tnea 1 z � - ., Ii 1, r ' 58 ' 'PI - • w f'' ..,fl • L 1 Uw /A..l co a 48TH ir 60 ` _.. dB 0 ` 1 . 1 1 03 AC S. ,% l° 1 ' 14111 • !r / v 1 l4IST 142N0 lstJ 5 1.16 AC e6 Jt9 4 65 7 AS 6 66 /[10 / 8 CE C MOTEL 4 Ll A ff AA ( +J /00 128.9 d' 13 u1 1 IT r COI2 ENT NOIBgR 18 LOCATION • NL' 7ER 23. TASK FORCE :COMMENT Rezone Rya 7200/SF to & *u lti- f ai ly mofte: , .RING COONTY'ZONING /COI1PREHENSIVE PLAN RS 7200 /SF:(Single = 6 .units /acre) EXISTING LAND OSE Vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.9 STAFF NOTES 1) The. minimum Tukwila multi - family zone is R -2 Duplex units at 11•units /acre, with the maximum being 29 units /acre. This would mean 'a maximum unit'count of 10 to 26 units at the site, depending zoning. 2) Surrounding zones are RM 900 (48 units /acre) to the east, and northeast with single family zones t o the south, .west and southwest. The northwest parcel's multi- family zoning is also under review.(see Comment 9). t.439 r7r n no +,r 60 • r 1 111 1 WY tie reo /6 r / ▪ tie Yd 10 n 's3Zs L7 ti 10L; •7M JO /t /4 ■ 4/4/ ,J4 0a 1:31001 i � 4/ ►t /ft 11.1/41J .,. re 9 1,r - c. JO o c , r r rr � /YCO It !.I/ 1 10/ °. ru 035AC IS • 13 n 03?AC , ,,ji /10 Tso 133 u h rr .Y11 !t /M o 0 30 A ( n o , 1 014 16 1 10 ry 1 ^ r,_ ItG3d 1...g.: n _ n \ y A � q A) , � h L63. �4 , 11711' ( 1 r.• •' r'I � ! 23 n 4)14) DU ` u,f W - -+9o-•- 6 ti 12532 8;e r ST 1 1 4 _• •t S 1Y 11. J I� /90 • ' 1: ,i1 i } I +t 33 � _> 13C In COMMENT NUMBER 19 C LOCATION NC` :`ER 24 TASK _'FORCE COMMENT Rezone RS 7200 (Single family = 6 units /acre) with RM 2400 Potential (18 units /acre), to a standard multi- family zone. KING COUNTY ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RS 7200 /SF (see above). EXISTING LAND USE Single family and vacant NUMBER OF ACRES: 0.4 (say 19,000 sq. ft.) STAFF NOTES 1) See Staff Note 1, Comment 18. 2) • Surrounding zones are single family to north, south and west, au . enx It i- family (1 s3 units/acre) tirq the east.. The eastern multi - family zone is under review (see Comment 13). 1 ' I1 1 1 1 it 1 1 11 1 II II 3550 Sl S 442ND PL ▪ I,4316 AC 1 1445: it 1 ft IAJ 11 /.1Y 06 1 AC It /If 14 y �M I AP. 2-4; AC • r l 44'5'0 la( ,6ti ti o 1 yd 1,3 FIELD DIrVEI INC lI ftt_� 31 AC ft /61 11 td0 7957 4 044 A(.14 1.4103 v • 4. 4. rn h ,/ ,I. p�l° �a06s eV. .Y J 1I .'!1 ` 141 It ..1/ h ,,. • ��� o17►s •C. d ti[`, l ) u si r 141 Io ,1 ta,.1 1 • , _ ` f7 S 91 5 r i X � '' q�{ S. 142ND PL . I -.7•-•'-'-'. 0 .1.1 ItI /1� a V eQ tto tn.J 1t et.' � ' f.'. 54 e " U ! ! AC ... It Ill ; 1t ldI� �••i / (V 1! . 1144 At o us K ,b AC � Y9 I 1 t Id .. 1t ire 1 /3 a r 1.? 1V- -r tli p - 1451,. 't 1.Y ,ie 1A ;19` �' �� 14 e.l t If if) • y GIIi ■ o • 1 d E: e o Alai 1 ---- • --, .. 1M 21' - "1 3.* 41M 1 ,. !'� N I ll ', I I u 1 ?M ?do 11 /o ' 41I (1 i 14239 12 8 • t 4.1 1t /3) 33 AC ..1. - • • ••••••• • ••••••■ • =Mama • Ti 164 I ! t. , rin f � � � , • 119= :u CEMETERY 20 Is)' 1• -! I 11t ,5: 2 7 124 /4.4 1 t, 144 b 0) a " 1441'i b p •4 (i 04 ICI 0'. 1�1 60 - d i s 1110 ti r s 41 . ! I 30 1y ' 1 '. - 1.',IhG 1 . —. J l.,o ,eo i .�4g`2g I` � rat 9 ` 2D • I ;I 10 ao 12 13 Om 14 y,y 015 C31, lJt i 1 'b J. 27 26 25 A , I ' rod 11 , J1 0 40 AC c ye I 1 I I ■ 12 It • • 1. :rn . .�t 14 D1501 5 935446 OA 2 081 4 19 `1 Er --15 ZO 0 ti 141ST `W WC VxtrtYduKlma�r[�Mer. C1 Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet 0 Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet C1 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION WENDY BULL hereby declare that: SEE ATTACHED TASK FORCE MATRIX. Name of Project CASCADE PRE- ANNEXATION File Number 89 -2 -A O Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice tia Other Cascade View Task Force Meeting & Schedule O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on May 12, 1989. 19 . S /10 7/1 7/1 - 8/10 8/21 - 10/1 10/1 - 10 /25 11/1989 2/6/90 3/6/90 May 10, 1989 Sincerely, City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Dear Cascade View Resident: Below is the tentative annexation schedule as presented at the May 3rd information meeting. J Pre - annexation zoning with Citizen Task Force (four meetings). Tukwila Planning Commission public hearing and recommendation. Tukwila Council public hearings (two) and approval. Potential Boundary Review Board public hearing. County council authorizes election. Special Annexation Election. Effective date of annexation. Please don't hesitate to contact me at 433 -1858 if I can be of further help. Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner May 4, 1989 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TASK FORCE Dear Task Force Member, Thank you very much for volunteering your time to work on this challenging project. I feel that this time spent working out land use issues in advance will result in a long -term development pattern which best reflects community needs and desires. I am scheduling the first meeting for the following time and place: This is a temporary meeting time and place. We will discuss other meeting options on Thursday. I am also enclosing a projected work schedule for your review. Please call me at 433 -1858 if you are not able to attend this first meeting. I look forward to seeing you there. Sincerely, Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner Thursday, May 18, 1989 at 7:00 P.M Police Training Room, Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Blvd. 06/01/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #2 Finalize issues and issue sites. Identify draft alternative zoning for sites. Discussion CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TASK FORCE PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING PROCESS 05/18/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #1 Review Annexation and Zoning Process Review Cascade Data Analysis Discuss Tukwila Zoning Review Preliminary Summary of Zoning Concerns Task Force Identification of Additional Concerns Assignment: Visit the various issue sites and become familiar with the situation. 06/15/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #3 Draft Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations Discussion and Alternatives 06/29/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #4 Final Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations Discussion and Alternatives 08/10/89 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Deliberation Decision 08/21/89 CITY COUNCIL Transmit to Community Affairs and Parks Committee Workshop and Public Hearing No. 1 on 8/21/89 Identification of annexation terms and zoning 07/27/89 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AND PUBLIC HEARING Briefing Trip to issue areas Public Hearing 09/25/89 CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing No. 2. 10/02/89 CITY COUNCIL Adopt Resolution on annexation terms and zoning Approve election to be held. i ilf,'s'. w' 'i iY�,a'!:[G�..+:s•:i��; `,t .uM. rTiS lYfY+.'ffl'4srr. .ns..x...�..........,......r... AFF IDAVIT Wendy Bull O Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting Ei Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit WNW OF 0I STR, ION hereby declare that: Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action O Official Notice was mailed to each of the following addresses on May 8, 1989. SEE ATTACHED: (Interested Parties) Name of Project CASCADE VIEW File Number 89 - -A EX Other Fntering Tukwila? Questions and Answers Flyer Q Other , 19 . ^ 1: <4,.4'+ aIT ,'!J g • e∎ 6.Y Tgilti w ir i . 'b7 P7 '.S ^r V. •'iS 'r $:C •:v� 1. +'ttm' 2" . .7 'rises : r. . M.,t - t.,• .„ t. 1 , n. �.':`7F "i1' : ;traa ,i .c^., p9rw •cx^. r.K•.• !tv *•s , .,.. '''. As7:: �, phv: �'. e.' i�u< Sif> 5r.. ��i, e...... S.t L` s3:.xu..........a�•ii'r`.,,il:i : <` �k5 »:.!11n.,d�:u.�nwxrs ^..:rrW.w r...,. �N:�4.2•F1;..avfr�/l� 5�1�.,7J(v �.e.,,t� �,....: iE'tl �at.•',S: �'�:i:�� rev.. S..:... e �i2?..0 4. T...�!'F'ms...�i ENTERING TUKWILA? QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS I NTROI)UCTION 0 4% Cascade View ANNEXATION The City of Tukwila has received a request by residents in your area for annexation to the City. This annexation request includes "pre- annexation zoning ", so that residents will know the zoning to be established before they vote. An initial review of the annexation request indi- cates that annexation to Tukwila would be very positive for both Cascade View residents and the City. This brochure has been prepared to answer commonly asked questions about annexation. As in all governments, policies and programs are reviewed and updated over time. Thus, some answers may change with time. ANNEXATION PROCESS Who votes in the annexation election? Registered voters within the boundaries of the annexation area will decide if they want the area to become part of Tukwila. See the map for the boundaries. What if I own property but don't live in the area and want to be involved in the annex ation decision? The Tukwila City Council and Planning Commission will hold public hearings on the MAY 1989 annexation request and /or area zoning. You may contact either body to discuss your con- cerns and possible involvement in the issue. A task force of residents and businesses will be formed in early May. Call the Department of Community Development at 433 -1858 for more information. The King County Boundary Review Board may also hold a public hearing if it invokes jurisdic- tion. I understand there will be two questions asked of me when I vote. Yes. Proposition 1 will determine if Cascade View should be annexed to Tukwila. The annexation will be approved if a majority of the votes cast are "Yes ". Proposition 2 will determine if Cascade View should assume a portion of Tukwila's existing indebtedness. (See FINANCE below.) Approval requires a 60 percent majority and a vote by at least 40 percent of the total number who voted in the last general election. If we vote to annex, when will we be officially a part of the City? The effective date when you become part of Tukwila may be between one and three months following the election. What happens if the vote is not in favor of annexation? Your status as unincorporated County would continue unchanged. No fu` er action or review would be necessary. POLICE AND FIRE What will happen to police service if I annex? "911" would remain the primary number for fire and police service. The Cascade View neighborhood will be patrolled by Tukwila police officers, who provide emergency response in just under four minutes. Other services and programs such as crime prevention, drug awareness and business security are available by calling the Tukwila Police Department. What about fire protection? Tukwila provides fire protection services to residents and businesses in an annexed area. Full -time professional firefighters will provide service to Cascade View from a fire station at 144th and 42nd Avenue. Mutual aid agree- ments with Fire Districts 11 and 2 would provide back-up protection. FINANCE The biggest part of my local tax bill is my property tax. Will my property tax go up or down if I annex? Property taxes in Tukwila are slightly lower than in King County. The yearly Tukwila property tax on a $100,000 home would be $27- $43 less annually than the County, depending on whether City bonded indebtedness is assumed. $300 tLtj g ,, King County $243:47, $200 t : X RATE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ' fUKWILA AND KING COUNTY • 1988 Average Assessed Home Value $65,000 • What is "bonded indebtedness"? City of Tukwila '$206.34 S r. e i This is a special tax to purchase the Foster Golf Course and will be paid for by 1998. In 1989, this indebtedness is $15 per $100,000 of assessed value. As shown in the illustration, even with this indebtedness added, the Tukwila property tax rate is $23 lower than unincorporated King County. Do you have to accept bonded indebtedness if you vote to annex? It will be a separate ballot vote from the annex- ation question. However, the City Council would have the option of denying the annexa- tion petition if bonded indebtedness is not assumed. Are there any other changes in taxes that I should know about? At this time the City of Tukwila does not have any additional taxes on property, business or utilities. The sales tax in King County and Tukwila are the same at 8.1%. A Tukwila stormwater utility fee is likely in the near future, which is similar to that now paid in King County. LAND USE How will the zoning change if the area is annexed? Petitioners for annexation have requested to establish Tukwila zoning prior to annexation. This zoning would become effective only upon annexation to the City. Il Riverton Hosp. CASCADE VIEW S 1 th':S S 148th St S 152nd St S 150th St. Riverton Foster S .140th St Thorndyke LEGEND Tukwila City Limits �. �. Sea Tac City Limits Proposed Cascade View Annexation NO SCALE Edgar D. Bauch, Councilmember 243-0774 Joe H. Duffie 244-4280 Mabel J. Harris 242-5359 TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Marilyn S. Stoknes, President 246-7235 Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor 243-6743 John M. McFarland, City Administrator 433-1832 Joan Hernandez, Councilmember 248-0260 Clarence B. Moriwaki 433-8539 Dennis L. Robertson 242-6373 TUKWILA CITY ADMINISTRATION FORMATION ON SPECIFIC SUBJECTS KIN COUNTY TUKWILA , L and Use Planning 296-7600 433-1849 Zoning and Permits 296-6650 433-1 433_2000 43 3-1815 Police '., Fire 243-0330 575-4404 Traffic and Planning 296-740 296-4232 243-51 Finance ' " , - 296-7300 - '-' ' - ' 433-1838 Clerk , - 06-1682 ' 33-1 "ng County ' oundary eview Boar A citizens' task force of people ( n the area , be involved in a review of current zoning during May and June 1989. Public hearings will then follow in July through September 1989. Your participation is important; please call the Department of Community Development if you'd like to be on the task force. What will happen to buildings that do not conform to City zoning standards? Existing legal buildings will be grandfathered and can be maintained by the property owner. Expansion of a building must satisfy City stan- dards. If the building is destroyed, the new replacement building will have to meet City standards. Nonconforming residential structures includ- ing mobile homes may continue as they exist now and may be replaced after a natural disaster.. Mobile homes are not allowed as single - family dwelling units outside of mobile home parks. I have a boat and trailer that I use for vacations. May I park them in front of my house, in the yard, or on the street? Recreational vehicles may be parked and stored in your yard but not on the adjacent street, except for short-term parking. I'm an independent truck operator; may I park my vehicle at my house? Four -ton vehicles used for commercial purposes are not permitted in residential zones. STREETS AND UTILITIES If I have an operating septic system, will I have to connect with a sewer system? It is not City practice to require connection unless the King County Health Department condemns the septic system. If there is a sani- tary sewer line within 250 feet of any property with a building for human occupancy, a con- nection to the sewer system can be required. This is similar to King County practice when such property is within 330 feet of a sewer line. Tukwila does not regulate septic tanks; you will continue to contact the King County Health Department. How does the « decide where sidewalks will be installed? In Tukwila, sidewalks are required as part of commercial /industrial development. Side- walks are not required on residential lots unless a new subdivision is created or the street is improved. Currently, sidewalks are provided as part of the residential street improvement program. If my area annexes, will the City of Tukwila provide my sewer and water service? Annexation will normally not affect your cur- rent water or sewer provider. There are many special purpose sewer and water districts within the City limits. If over 60% of a sewer or water district's area is within the City, the District and Tukwila may consider an agreement for the City to assume their responsibilities. If you are not within any district's service area, then upon annexation, you would be a part of Tukwila's sewer and /or water utility. You are not charged fees unless you actually receive water or sewer service. What effect will the annexation have on street lighting costs? You currently pay for your own street lights through the Water District. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila will assume street lighting costs, if street lighting can be removed from your water bill. RECREATION AND THE ARTS What community interest programs are available in Tukwila? A full range of youth, adult and senior activities are available at the Tukwila Community Cen- ter, parks and local schools. The City also has an active Arts Commission that sponsors a year 'round series of entertainers at City Hall. An informational brochure of programs and special events is sent to all City residents four times a year. GLNLR; \L Who collects garbage in the City of Tukwila? Whoever currently collects your garbage may continue to do so, or you may continue to haul your own garbage after annexation. The City also offers a semi - annual free haul pass to the dump for residents of the City and an annual household hazardous waste clean -up. After annexation, will I be able to participate in local government? Following annexation, area residents will be eligible to serve on the City's Park Commission, Arts Commission, Library Advisory Board, Sister City Committee, Civil Service Commis- sion, Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment. Residents are also eligible to vote and run for the City Council and Mayor. All City residents are eligible to vote for their King County Council representative, County Executive, Port Commissioner and other regional positions. Annexation will not change your ability to vote for these positions. A quarterly community newsletter, the "Hazelnut ", is sent to City residents and businesses to keep everyone abreast of community events, capital improvement projects, parks improvements, recreation programs, and City services. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 What happen() schools with annexation? Nothing happens to schools. Annexation does not affect the boundaries of school districts and it has no effect on which school a child will attend. Will my address change if I annex to Tukwila? No, your address and zip code remain the same. You may choose to use Tukwila instead of Seattle as place of residence. REPRESENTATION OF POPULATION KING COUNTY 1 County Executive for 1,413,900 CITY OF TUKWILA ttfliff District 5 Council Positions at Large 1 Representative for 198,000 7 Representatives for 12,600 1 Mayor for 12,600 BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID TUKWILA, WA PERMIT # 12698 ',Ll g5y',,', C. wagiVr.EYsvf."!.C'Cle' ?;7. acei z May 4, 1989 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TASK FORCE Dear Task Force Member, Sincerely, Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 ZIZIA S"' :!!3'IS?Al4f*MCS' +?.7 +'4 t0iht3N;9 etVatle l:L Thank you very much for volunteering your time to work on this challenging project. I feel that this time spent working out land use issues in advance will result in a long -term development pattern which best reflects community needs and desires. I am scheduling the first meeting for the following time and place: Thursday, May 18, 1989 at 7:00 P.M Police Training Room, Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Blvd. This is a temporary meeting time and place. We will discuss other meeting options on Thursday. I am also enclosing a projected work schedule for your review. Please call me at 433 -1858 if you are not able to attend this first meeting. I look forward to seeing you there. . rater.. w+ w�i. s. c.. �a.. wo+ ��¢ wu. h+ nrcnc+ .a.N.w..++�1+�..HxMawYtrvv�]�Naf WV1KwMav WTrwv:�twu+. W��vr: uw�[ wrw.... �r.-.. w..rrwnN+re�wr•..wwwr..�.r.w..� 0 CITY OF TUKWILA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING AGENDA May 3, 1989 7 :00 to 9:00 P.M. Cascade View Elementary School 7:00 p.m. Welcome and Introductions Gary Van Dusen, Mayor of Tukwila Cascade and Tukwila Overview Vernon Umetsu. Project Coordinator Tukwila Department of Community Development Presentations by Tukwila Service Providers Various Tukwila Department Representatives Brief Presentations will be made by various City departments, followed by a question- and - answer session Annexation and Zoning Process Vernon Umetsu, Project Coordinator Presentation of draft annexation process and time frames for public hearings. 8:30 p.m. Break up for Informal Discussions �bAIy 6Y; .r.in+v.MUmu. al....4Yn.an 4101 M.VII*174,1. ur*+Yr.w'unrr.,r....r... rim. a rwwr r...... Wv uaar 'rR.MUUVrrwramr.tort..rwmetul. .xW�rr�v+.4wra5 JfhrsiulnNN. c.^ JMIMSKRWyGYK. R1. u. SrYrwrsnMfm. w .rve;ar.erwr.wwrmn�..i..+.�....a CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION TASK FORCE PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING PROCESS 05/18/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #1 Review Annexation and Zoning Process Review Cascade Data Analysis Discuss Tukwila Zoning Review Preliminary Summary of Zoning Concerns Task Force Identification of Additional Concerns Assignment: Visit the various issue sites and become familiar with the situation. 06/01/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #2 Finalize issues and issue sites. Identify draft alternative zoning for sites. Discussion 06/15/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #3 Draft Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations Discussion and Alternatives 06/29/89 TASK FORCE MEETING #4 Final Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designations Discussion and Alternatives 07/27/89 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AND PUBLIC HEARING Briefing Trip to issue areas Public Hearing 08/10/89 PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Deliberation Decision 08/21/89 CITY COUNCIL Transmit to Community Affairs and Parks Committee Workshop and Public Hearing No. 1 on 8/21/89 Identification of annexation terms and zoning 09/25/89 CITY COUNCIL Public Hearing No. 2. 10/02/89 CITY COUNCIL Adopt Resolution on annexation terms and zoning Approve election to be held. DATE: APRIL, 23 1989 TO: VERNON UMETSU FROM: ROBERT L. BCE 13514 35TH AVE SO. SEATTLE, WASH. REG: ANNEXATION TUKWILA TUKWILA ANNEXATION RESPECTFULLY ROBERT L. DOE ^1 1144 ��' APR »�1��Q | ' � m u " /�v� | ' As a Citizen of the Cascade View area I'm very interested in what is happening in this area. I would like to be involved in whatever capacity that would serve the Citizens of this area. Below are a few questions that must be addressed befpre any of the Citizens of this area consider any annexation proposal by your representatives. A: The problems that are being endured by this area are. Drugs, Drug Gangs, Prostitution, Crack Houses, Drunk Drivers. These formentioned problems are not only contrary to what we as Citizens want but they are against the law. There are more, but the above mentioned problems are formost in the minds of the Citizens in this area. Other problems that we as Citizens are interested in are. B: Undesirable Businesses, Gangs from out of this area that hang around our schools harrass the teachers and students and even go into the schools for whatever reason suits them. C: Then what about our representation on the City Council, w0.1 we have Representatives in attendence. There are taxes to consider, protection, police protection and related subjects such as responce to any emergancies that my arise in this area. Enclosing I will add that in my opinion the judicial system has failed the law abiding citizens of our Country, County and City. Its about time our rights as Citizens of this area prevailed over the dregs of our society, and those who broke the law, paid for it. ^~' 1 }?:£u•Sd�3lcrFUrm, w. »,.,..cxu,uuca.� sic+at A. m�wx. u. a m+ xr+ cuuvrw. ow .ww.....1*0.w.. ........ irn f wrr... r...+.. +�w,r.«.. >.r_......m....,.++no, .�w,.e«+...... +_......._,.._... .__....._.__......_..— .._�.__._ A F F I D A V I T OF 0 I STR,T,BUT ION Wendy Bull hereby declare that: Q Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on April 21, 1989 SEE ATTACHED: �Q — ) Name of Project CASCADE ANNEXATION File Number 1 Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action • Official Notice El Other Public Information Meeting O Other Lit , 19 . City of Tukwila 41 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Dear Resident or Property Owner: The City of Tukwila received a petition for annexation by election for the Cascade View area. You are invited to attend an informational meeting on the proposed annexation. The reverse side of this notice shows a map of that area. Meeting information is provided below: DATE: Wednesday - May 3, 1989 TIME: 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. LOCATION: Cascade View Elementary School Gymnasium 13601 - 32nd Avenue South PURPOSE OF MEETING Representatives from the City of Tukwila will be there to: • Explain how the annexation process works. • Review the time frame for an election. • Provide handouts explaining common questions about annexation. • Listen and answer questions you have regarding the annexation request. CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT Toward the end of the meeting, City staff will be asking for resident and property owner volunteers to serve on a citizens' task force with the Tukwila Planning staff to develop a comprehensive plan and zoning for the area. FUTURE MEETINGS This summer, the Tukwila Planning Commission and City Council will be , ivL r g p blic mcc`i .g:; tt c proposed land use plan, zoning and annexation request. FURTHER INFORMATION Contact Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner, at 433 -1858. All correspondence can be mailed to them at the Tukwila Department of Community Develop- ment, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 13 PROPOSED CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION u...i SEA TAC BOUNDARY NO SCALE tiosi;a442a4u. .::.an M .Atitact:.zc:cratulootwra asa4;z04 3are 4 Zac`: 'a 2r,A� fr.Lx;�r:PG mac, acta an.1 xxt ezerazizzo srasmilsvaysa . 21.011'. gMZE1 x i T a =M IS CITY OF TUKWILA CASCADE VIEW ANNEXATION NEWS FINAL EDITION April 10, 1990 CASCADE ANNEXATION UPDATE. VOTERS TO CAST BALLOTS ON MAY 22ND Registered Voters to Decide Tukwila Annexation It took nine months, but all legislative and admin- istrative decisions have now been made to allow a vote on annexation of Cascade View to the City of Tukwila. Mail -in ballots will be sent by the King County Office of Records and Elections to all registered voters in Cascade View for a May 22nd election. Cascade View would be annexed if a majority of those casting votes choose to join Tukwila. The ballot will have two questions: (1) Should the area annex, and (2) Should the area pay the exist- ing $15 per $100,000 assessed value for City bonds. The area would be automatically annexed if both questions pass, while further City Council ap- proval would be required should the $15 tax question fail. Failure of the annexation question will cause the area to remain in unincorporated King County. The City of Tukwila fully supports whatever decision is made by the voters, and looks forward to working with all communities for a better future. Boundary Review Board Deletes Northwest Corner from Annexation The King County Boundary Review Board deleted the northwest corner from the proposed Cascade View annexation in response to residents in this area. The Board approved the revised annexation to go forward for a vote. Both the Tukwila City Council and King County Council accepted the Board's action, clearing the way for the May 22nd annexa- tion vote. The following questions and answers are reprints of earlier editions to answer questions commonly asked of Tukwila staff. All answers have been updated to reflect the latest information. gt:u4 ! a:9:F31' 4, SK:i:'1Fi cr: L` LY.:J ag:43SYJ`. .+.v /.:tAZ.:Q.SAV :tin llc:VMtxbrr.� POLICE AND FIRE, What will happen to police service if I annex? "911" would remain the primary number for fire and police service. The Cascade View neighborhood will be patrolled by Tukwila police officers, who provide emergency re- sponse in just under four minutes. Other services and programs such as crime prevention, drug awareness and business security are available by calling the Tukwila Police Department. TUKWILA POLICE RESPONSE TIME EMEE RGENCY NON- URGENT 3 minutes 7-8 minutes What about fire protection? Tukwila would provide fire protection to Cascade View from a fire station at 144th and 42nd Avenue, and one in Allentown. Mutual aid agreements with Fire Districts 11 and 2 would provide back -up protection. FINANCE The biggest part of my local tax bill is my prop- erty tax. Will my property tax go up or down if I annex? Property taxes in Tukwila are slightly lower than in King County. The yearly Tukwila property tax on a $100,000 home would be $27- $300 King C $100 t„ $200 What is "bonded indebtedness "? =Mr ttt:Ylia;`3a.:,(CC4 .,:.17 ,.l`1 .'ti .. TAX RATE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TUKWILA AND KING COUNTY 1989 Average Assessed Home Value $65,000 is -I-. (C ity of Tukwila k � ° 206.34 $43 less annually than the County, depending on whether City bonded indebtedness is as- sumed. This is a special tax to purchase the Foster Golf Course and will be paid for by 1998. In 1989, this indebtedness is $15 per $100,000 of as- sessed value. As shown in the illustration, even with this indebtedness added, the Tukwila property tax rate is $23 lower than unincorporated King County. Do you have to accept bonded indebtedness if you vote to annex? No. It will be a separate ballot vote from the annexation question. The City Council could still approve the annexation petition even if bonded indebtedness is not assumed. Are there any other changes in taxes that I should know about? Tukwila has very similar sales tax and storm - water utility fees as are now paid to King County. City stormwater fees are equivalent to the County for single - family uses, by gradu- ated differently for commercial uses. Proposed Cascade View Annexation TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL Joan Hernandez, Council President 248 -0260 Joe H. Duffie, Councilmember Allan E. Ekberg, Councilmember 244 -4280 241 -6904 Dennis L. Robertson, Councilmember Steve Lawrence, Councilmember 242 -6373 243 -9266 Clarence B. Moriwaki, Councilmember John "Wally" Rants, Councilmember 244 -0588 433 -8539 TUKWILA CITY ADMINISTRATION Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor 243 -6743 John M. McFarland, City Administrator 433 -1832 KING COUNTY Land Use Planning 296 -7600 Zoning and Permits 296 -6650 Police 433-2000 F ire : 243 raffic and Planning > 296 7402 P arks 296 4232 F inance 296 -730 Clerk 296 16 King Coun Boundary Review Boar 2960 INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC SUBJECTS p:.;sw ;:.wzu:ax::.i it a:ti: a:>i�ittied tkatti faw.4u.ruaw :c • 14111241 LAND USE How will the zoning change if the area is an- nexed? Tukwila has worked with area residents to develop zoning which would be in place if annexed. Several public meetings and special mailings were used to get public input. Please call the Department of Community Develop- ment at 433 -1858 if you have further questions. What will happen to buildings that do not con- form to City zoning standards? Existing legal buildings will be grandfathered and can be maintained by the property owner. Expansion of a building must satisfy City stan- dards. If the building is destroyed, the new replacement building will have to meet City standards. Nonconforming residential structures includ- ing mobile homes may continue as they exist now and may be replaced after a natural disas- ter. Mobile homes are not allowed as single - family dwelling units outside of mobile home parks. I have a boat and trailer that I use for vacations. May I park them in front of my house, in the yard, or on the street? Recreational vehicles may be parked and stored in your yard but not on the adjacent street, except for short -term parking. I'm an independent truck operator; may I park my vehicle at my house? Four -ton vehicles used for commercial pur- poses are not permitted in residential zones. STREETS AND UTILITIES How does Tukwila decide what street improve- ments to make? All capital needs are evaluated on a City -wide basis with the greatest needs being taken care a as 3; estwaiar4raiza :srw:.ramuercmmaiuwmctrazg" t,w al^ rt atI VIc5Y8Ct F: A: 2il �s� 1 tr .^ JSC�Gti' i of first. Roadways and sidewalks are currently improved as part of a City - funded residential street program, with sidewalks and other road improvements also required as new multi- family and commercial projects develop. Drainage would be funded by stormwater utility fees. If my area annexes, will the City of Tukwila provide my sewer and water service? Tukwila has no plans to change your current sewer or water provider. Tukwila would serve areas not in a sewer /water district upon an- nexation. What effect will the annexation have on street lighting costs? You currently pay for your own street lights through the Water District. Upon annexation, the City of Tukwila will assume street lighting costs, if street lighting can be removed from your water bill. GENERAL Who collects garbage in the City of Tukwila? There would be no change in garbage service providers. The City also offers a semi - annual free haul pass to the dump for residents of the City and an annual household hazardous waste dean-up. What community interest programs are available in Tukwila? A full range of youth, adult and senior activi- ties are available at the Tukwila Community Center, parks and local schools. The City also has an active Arts Commission that sponsors a year 'round series of entertainers at City Hall. An informational brochure of programs and special events is sent to all City residents four times a year. After annexation, will I be able to participate in local government? Residents are immediately eligible to serve on the City's Park Commission, Arts Commission, Library Advisory Board, Sister City Commit- tee, Civil Service Commission, Planning Com- mission and Board of Adjustment. Residents would also be eligible to vote and run for the City Council and Mayor in 1991. All City residents are eligible to vote for their King County Council representative, County Executive, Port Commissioner and other re- gional positions. Annexation will not change your ability to vote for these positions. A quarterly community newsletter, the "Hazel- nut", is sent to City residents and businesses to keep everyone abreast of community events, capital improvement projects, parks improve- ments, recreation programs, and City services. What happens to schools with annexation? Nothing happens to schools. Annexation does not affect the boundaries of school districts and it has no effect on which school a child will attend. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 REPRESENTATION OF POPULATION KING COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA ttfliff District 5 1 Representative for 198,000 1 County Executive for 1,413,900 Council Positions at Large 7 Representatives for 12,600 1 Mayor for 12,600 Will my address change if I annex to Tukwila? No, your address and zip code remain the same. You may choose to use Tukwila instead of Seattle as place of residence. If you would like to know more, please contact Vernon Umetsu at 433 -1858, or Jack Pace at 433 -1847. CAR RT SORT Bulk Rate U.S. Postage Paid Tukwila, WA Permit No. 12698 • / 6,/ 6 " 1 I s o 039 • • • 9ff9 / 70 /10 LOT 4 LOTS o i N, o N a la o e ro g 3 th a‘o > ti t 588-10 -46G Sao 46 -rose/ / "�A 0- 0-4811 !!%, 2 O V, K.0 U...a 060494 ADDITIONA ANNEXATI AREA d r • 31 $ , 0 p 0.10 Ne0-10-4611 Wei) 2 a 0 atop. 5' 90 I ihoe 90 4 a82. rim 1 "= 100' N S Dy f 700 N Aso 0 0 o410 a o b° • /so 23 9.6 I el. o /e a0 • v► fr ,o ° APPROX SCALE N ccivoit woods �fl Z°' 0 VIP ro /os. r ;pt. #6. u•sta 3 2.1,131 o994. 01 • n 00,Bo0 °a 0 493 Zta y3. 0 . 0 495 0 tl' ' 03 °e 0 71.7 s 0 0 ti N t9 it 8.6 (7.7) t I 2 49.9 /73.? z1, �5 3 q o 244.3 / A Ip r ° ' 1`1° 0 + 03 04/9 /4S i22 40 4 0 CO I 60 71.7 0 0 95 03 7 40.84 \A C £2.4 I s I, I 3. o 0/ 96 11 4111...r 1 L zs1 8510 4 0106 104/2 I . 1 4 0409 SS 0 3 I /87 SO 0 o rb /44•7e 84.7 j So A # ,t0 00 h i 0310 3 0 29 lii ..:._ *2..t ..... 150TH ST 12.3 0 X 50 ✓I is OS 4.78 8 23. 97 639° o6 90 al a • • • .••• r L 0 r. vi 0 H �o� • ANNEXATION TABLE CATEGORY RIVERTON FOSTER THORNDYKE FD #1 C ', Population 858 902 2,965 1,308 3,00 Assessed Valuation (in millions) 43 28 80 470 KX) Percent of Tukwila at 70 Population 26% 16% 97% 27% Housing Units (Total) 401 465 1,644 663 02 Single- Family 282 211 389 513 lip Multifamily 119 254 1,255 150 tpb Registered Voters 499 379 1,120 627 ( Area (acres) 223 196 469 1,375 5g1 Roads (miles) 5.77 3.17 6.34 15.75 * The 1988 assessed valuation for Tukwila is $965,711,859. The annexations will increase the assessed value of the City by 64 %. * With the combined four annexation areas, the City's total acreage rises from 2880 to 5143, an area increase of 79 %. CITY uF TUKWILA ANNEXATION APPLICATION NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: Please complete all appropriate sections of the applica- tion below. Information contained in this application will be used in preparing all of the necessary documentation for this annexation; therefore, please type or clearly print all of the necessary information. If additional space is required tor response to any of these sections, feel free to attach additional sheets to this application. If you have any questions with regard to this application, please feel free to contact the Planning Department at 433 -1849, or you may discuss this matter in person at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Do you wish t ave the area's zoning adopted simultaneously with the annexa- tion? Yes No - dfritig w�( I Vat II -�5 ". If pr annexat��n z ning s appro y th City Coun , the proposed zoning can be circulated on the 75% Annexation Petition. The Applicant is required to complete an Environmental Checklist for the pro- posed annexation. The Environmental Checklist requires a filing of $100. Please return the completed Checklist with your completed Annexation Application and Notice of Intention. PROPONENT N am 6 d .5 --5:,40-1- a .v Address /63 83 3 7 y C i t y 4/Lae �-• T.elephone -# -.- 2t- 397//L LOCATIuN Property Address Assessed valuation Legal Description CONTACT PERSON if other than proponent let( / /dC5" Z 1 - 3 - 7 7 % Lot Area Sq. Ft. Current County zoning Desired Tukwila zoning Acres PURPOSE OF ANNEXATION - Briefly describe the reasons you desire to annex. (Revised 11/85) We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be /7456 registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.O2O of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 0 Name: (Print .Y.ti.E:0.B.Fi0illAe // /J--go /51%t3 3.?1dE Signature• OK 2. Name: (Print) f, 1/4-14 dtelf /- /3 -gS / 3O� /- 33440A7 So Signature: (5/ &pA/, JdR 3. Name: (P rint) //.-/31f /.321/ 32, / S r� •- Signature:��� • ,gs27�A,r IVR4. Name: (Print) it-e M, ct,t-s //- /3 -y7 /3 ;// -3.2s "! So. Signature,, Aik5. Name: (Print) /e..' I Ji42 f,,c,s / /-/ T [ 3 Z /6 "72 SO, Signature: .e:/ 6. Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: 8. Name: (Print) Signature: WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign,, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ELECPET. PETITION TO FOR T A N NEXATION ` 1. f CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTi (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTir. (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) Ok 1. Name: (Pri t) Signature: oK 2: Name: (Print) Signature: ok 3. Name: (Print) --Signature: A 4. Name: (Print) ELECPET. REGISTERED VOTER ti QV efi Signature: 2?‘..„.. Signature: ;Leo C. (L 8. Name: (Print) 'Signature: DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # iu,5 � fl ,Vc3 I - G^, / v-d —42-if / 33,,? e/ 3i . /1- p-ev. 3 3aY Signature: X>d,-.2.7 / C, l Lc-4 0(5 . Name: (Print )/, 7 pi i ft- /V i 17)// S // / 42 /-3 336//1, iTu 7^ y N. s .l 3.33 o %��? 014, 6. Name: (Printed /Qcsti - a /1,*e. -C. / / -i. -Ci ` .9VG 7g5 Signature,;, < //< L /� : 0k7. Name: (Print).2-I G .MM)tfl F 11,1,.2 - g6' , / 9 V b.rk. /43 ►5 ')., P: WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. • . Name• (P 614:2. Name: (Print) Signature: ok 3. Name: (Print) Signature: ELECPET Signature: Signature: REGISTERED VOTER r.i�i►un run nnnGAniIun TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTO.. (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is- within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day'upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # . t) 9LiAN %AI 1 l-10 3231 13S Signature: s. Kai 1, j 1.ru.ri I I - l D - , �3aW) 5 . i �+h . pi ' ll /11iIK, /-- SA14 Cj I ) . 11. JJ D V — - oK4. Name: (Print) DoRormy P t E9 11 f.1, /py 13802- 33 Signature: ) J C/ 5. Name: (Print) /41 41 L• 0 - fly /,e mac- a 4411 W Signature: 0, 6. Name: (Print) / tr j . ,4 4.13440 / / 5707. ., /. '1 19 / /4k Si ApzetiriA e...-7t , OK 7. Name: (Print) /k // //t r /////a ,37a�o / 7er// 0,3 GAB. Name: (Print) 440/1 /) /CTZ- // / , , /`/U2F1- o. WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or'who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1 VI.1.V1. . VI\ I.. TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTIm (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER oK1. Name: (Print)`$Aep.A I [)iFrZ. 2. Name: (Print) #77 . 'Aso° Signature: Signature: Name: (Print •- Signatur O,x,4. Name: (Print) Signature: O/5. Name: (Print) k Signature: OK6. Name: (Print) ELECPET DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # Signature: 42, 6415/ 0K7. Name: (Print)? Signature: 8. Name: (Print) /tq .jk0 6.-,/'s15 i 'Signature: .4 6 WARNING • .te- / 1 - 33 -i(2 5. ...70 file- „ 57- 13f 305 56 167 // -// -gR 13h 15 3'/ � 4veS l 3 ..N/ . 5 t /I - / / -4Q ,.32 r Q -Sb i3 ? t6 . FL_ V $; • //%l Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED 1. Name: (Print) ea11 15eAk tt. f O,'. Signature: 2. Name: (Print) £o . /'?dv%e obr /I-6-130 C'k Signature 7)PAZ1- 3. Name: (Print), ,96 'l/ f 4 4 1° ab,5l 7 fL J 1-111 iCV J l j 1 Y 24S1 ci a (GI Old -Signature 4. Name: (Print) O/z. Signature 5. Name: (Print) O S Signature: 6. Name: (Print I✓A Signature: 7. Name: (Print) of Signature: ELECPET rc I L I Luti rut; 111ti i lun TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTUI TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: • • 41 AP 1 :sen (Election Method) ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # ►� ) z(0 3 tt Pl. 5. ttcpre ` t o / 4;E P i a 44e, 471 it/' 7— -374eCi // - c tphr //4- 88 / *to aS/n /� • /3S5P j 8. Name: (Print) &)ol' e _. J- /Hu /J €/ '/- /U"tP Ok -Signature: WARNING Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 43/3 3- 4 /3.24 GvA /iF /6 TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number t'o ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. Name: (Print Signature: REGISTERED VOTER PETiFiUN FOR ANNEXATION TO THE ` zle"‘ CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGIud (Election Method) DATE SIGNED I t - SYS ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # ¶35A1 3�T'' Vlx•S 2. Name: (Print)ZDJ,AIF. 1e;n,5%y /35 ,.7 - , 37 -Se 0 Signatur , 3 . Name: (Print) 5 e*'S _ L /P 11 i'/` M/t .pl / a,4,1$ O� - Signatures °7/2/ .5 } lea l6/6 r 4. Name: (Pr n MR12.C-P-t2E? . LL•Sa li- --i' / LAI, o M.t may 144 _ GX; S ignature lrc-L' 4-Tr LE le 4. 9f/td 5. Name: (Print) V p P1 71 . OM' 1l0 + 11 ff o, Signature: .: •L . Llno 6. Name: (Print ) ,,_, ` ,a* 0Cti CA Signature: , . ft 7. Name: (Print) 40/ O Signature• y 8. Name: (Pri A/ ELECPET cog re & /otwi41 4(av �rrr � r8 J3c3,Z 37 O ,k. Si Dc 4a re2s iTS,•nlvs04) . e z z -, 'kc;. 5h' - WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER 00 - 1. Name: (Print) Le/e/ ///9. Li1/U,5 Signature: Y.41_41 111 • Ajle, 2. Name: (Print) p k Signature: 3. Name: (Print) i_ y R , \ 1'a 11 13h0 . r.Ah aLt , -Signature: 0W Name: (Print) Signature: JA/ASS )1/5 dE$ Name: (Prin Signature. Name: (Print) Signature: Name: (Print) Signature: Name: (P n Signature: ELECPET TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: rLILiiun ruti Nf1I .MIlun TO THE / CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGIvI (Election Method) e e- i D• Qed 4 DATE SIGNED /1- 6 8? ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # /35/3 - 35)4 R5 Au t = 35 A So oTh 13.5 /. 3 3 4v 1.- //- S -g3 i /7_5;9 S•'`•� s /$2 !� —S - y / Y5"? : 7 . `.; WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 3EL 1. Name: (Print) R. 13Lii26L / /J1 3: cS 1 4_el Signature. , oL2. Name: (Print) i� - �; „ ,q / / -� Y8 3.Z.2a S. /VS / Signature: 04. Name: (Pr int) 451 wA R. cluragioA I /91 V ' qty 5. / t- - Signature: 4% OA... Name: (Print) Signature: . Name: (Print) Signature: rGIII &Um fVR NI�I�CANIIUI� TO THE Q CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTI,n p (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: 14!47** 5z/il So <<fz oI 6. Name: (Print), l w OV'' Signature: gmie 7. Name: (Print) aa/.000h 2;6 Signature:[ / , 0. Name: (Print) jam, i^ o h f,-,! e /d l 'Signature: L k_ � `A J WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ELECPET. 44/44 4 , itt,_ qg (6 ir We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTEERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # OVJec Name: (Print I A vi 411-1 13 :' / 7 ' Th,' $i Signature: rah ,p6a.. Name: (Print) J hN DbafA At J!"3 Q Signature: 4.4 ' 4 60. Name: (Pri t )Mat/Je nutuilxl i0Ore —Signature: 04. Name: (Print)CL. A ? r J( j> 1v Signature: 4'► Name: (Print) U/ IS.. L+'t 0.1% KrAritA ,4 Signature: Off: Name: (Print) 2 s /j 7 t /L-Q Signature. OP. Name: (Print) L,eory iroWCe✓l • 1 //3/Cg Signature: . f—. Ohl. Name: (Print) .J es Ad ELECPET TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: rtllilun run NnntAHliur TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING1ul (Election Method) V/ g ) 3 71 37 J.t, t) It -3-1 137As 37S-n /4 / r= 3 7 e t S /3 53y - 35. 5 we f - 9 i' /G 4' ss 7-4 SD. 11)13 95r/Lf /'17 = 379 - So /37 15' 3 WARNING Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualif for annexation equal in number last state general election th to determine 'whether such ar Washington, in which there is should be annexed to the City Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be a described as folows: SEE, att "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have reques regulations, it is recognized than sixty days after the fili time for the review of the prop This group of pages is one of petition seeking the annexatio Tukwila, and may be filed wi signatures. The undersigned has read the a and consents to the filing of part of this petition up thro filed with the King County Pros (Names of the pet as the same appe REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print),]o OK Signature: 2. Name: (Print)LN 5 • Signatur;• TO THE CITY C PET CITY 3. Name: (Print):7 # / "l. 1G i /0- 29- $ ok Signature:_{,' 7 7 . --. Name: (Print) yA -- c ,4 10-1 ii? Signature: 7. OK Signature: , 8. Name: (Print c 'J sIg ELECPET Name: (Print)51 - LLA Signature: ,L,QJ.a- I to 16 -.29-kg Name: (Print) it /b — Signature:leo A7,4 LILO Name: (Print) Lis /114.L Low /o -2954r W 1 i2 EP 77 LARov'E , 21/gm TION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE /D TUKWILA, WASHINGTOn Election Method) UNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: ed electors resident in the territory proposed to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the rein, do hereby call for an election to be held a, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, stimated to be registered voters, f Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the nexed is within King County, Washington, and is ched legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in ed the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning nd accepted that the meeting date may be later ng of this request in order to ensure adequate sed zoning regulation. number of identical groups of pages forming one of the property described below to the City of h other groups of pages containing additional ove or attached text and prayer of the petition ther groups of pages hereto to be considered as gh the working day upon which this petition is cuting Attorney. tioners should be in identical form ✓ on the voter's permanent registration) DATE SIGNED r1wn / /J -- F -28 ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # .332 .S' /.Ea Hcj Sea 7 L 7 11 e, ?k/..43 //4/5.L 7- _37 47 $ . /J >' 2 /3• 6g-37--0 / /3 O2 L J. �a • ,Lv "L12. Grt-ru . k/ 6 7 . /',3537 -3744 50 l6Sr 4 )'`'&4 (.1)c,— / 3837- 37`i`t <c.., /tic- �h/6g) /3g a 1 37 14 gales v wa 7 916 WARNING Every person who signs. this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one cf these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who rakes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 1. Name: (Print) 0‹ Signature: 0,--Signature: fir! ELECPET PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED -9 ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 2. Name: (Prin f2// / /,4 LZW45 Signature: /./L,% i.�, 3. Name: (Print),JO jc 7/ ii€ S GK Signature: 7 42 4. Name: (Prin J17CbE �FfCh 01<. Si 5. Name: (Print) -S0Cif oe f c11 )d :/'q 1-0 r•( Signature: 6. Name: (Pr, vN ALb L UCA S /38 5 6 3g -11 ' 'r•' - �c�. 0 < Signature: 7. Name: (Print) 5ha,i 41.(0ctc 10 - P4 � i G }e. Signature: / P,l ,l,7) 8. Name: (Print) tn. FILL ABEN FRAM td- a ? /383 - -` c5a. / 7 - 3 / WARNING Every person who signs_this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. REGISTERED VOTER I. Name: (Print) 0 Signature 2. Name: (Print) ok Signature. 3. Name: (Print) Ok•- Signature; ELECPET. TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTUi (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 4. Name: (lxrint) o Signature: 5. Name: (Print) 4NAlq D S ignature: DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 9 -s - /.SFY( 20.36-a )3? 3y 1° /3ad 1-? 1 5e /6 -300 /336/ 37 S� 6. Name: (Print)i -1* L 6 11 3 13315 - 32' Av.. s G Signature:LA,ue, _ h 7. Name: (Print) /iM/11,y,ie Ziy141r^ o Signature: 8. Name: (Prin / ) bAvio L LIVERStut o - 5 ignature• f GC/e01.—� '' WARNING Every person who signs- this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. VivAR s 10/30!&& . e7 & /3J Mg- 31 Avt sG • • 0 Signature: 6. Name: (Pri O k Signature: 7. Name: (Pr' Q. Signature oK Signature: ELECPET. )0""LLl, eezt, -.011 -4;442.. rLIaIavn I Vn nnn�nn� TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING1uN (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED 1. Name: (Print) 0 , /-? / 1— / -8& 0 Signatu 2. Name: (Print)ye/en, ). iA /Vitti /('/'8 a Signature. /3. Name: (Print)4epy,¢ A l ,g4 j // /- 0 k•-Si gnature: 4. Name: (Print) /1- /- G j.Si gnature: P 5. Name: (Print), Gif - 17 / 45) 17 'far 8. Name: (Print) Alc,,4rd SOAcw&, /' -" " siw/S ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # /3ka - 3 -7..C.-0 /F'9 3 7 6 eI S0 13a 31A 6_, ,�4113reQ 137/" 3 r g WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. PETIILU FUR ANNtxAIIUN TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTUd 7' (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit 8." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # /�/ 1. Name: (Print)/ W441j{f ( AIa.2 'i v /3T/ "3`/ / 0Signature: 2. Name: (Print) Abe/PH e• 1/sp d' /)_S -Je /3737- 3i,e/s-J 0 signature:: 3. Name: (Print )D it/1# 1J• •A/1IRPe " /372 444 :La) • C>/Signature: c 4. Name: (Print) /, � ei /o /Z &S RISi ,( 44 ISoZ4 34L can ELECPET o f Signature: 5. Name: (Print) . „ Y Il i :: /WI 3eidieS afr_$ignature: 6. Name: (Pri ok Signature: 7. Name: (Print) �'�e�R ii /O. T.%P //17 -Age 76 aAo5 OeRip Ii. ea tilt i4 !/ /,/�,,- /376S'- 3VAve. S. O Signature: � '' 11 t/ g r� 8. Name: (P r i nt) ICJ /�, a l S. e n( er ))-�b v� 0k Signature: � , , � � . iL, i . � 5cc LOA c WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign,. or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. Name: (Print) 6v. Signature: °Y—Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Oh Signature: 8. Name: (Print . Signature: ELECPET TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER rc.I i i Lun run NnntAHI LUn TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGIhd (Election Method) DATE SIGNED ), _ 2. Name: (Print) U6.r i r��Skar�'i l K Signature � n 3. Name: (Print) -seO ?7 ! eQ4fr( if pj Signature 4. Name: (Print) r 1 hn C,6S4 Y1 a k Signature: r' 5. Name: (Print) . �) Gr1114'Grh 0 Signature: L . -Q . 6. Name: (Print) ADDRESS AND TAX LOT oeSo 144,6 it 6 - 88 iqu3,a 3Lii c l -G -98 (q6z 3s`di S 1 /_ .r j f y0,3 7 35,V V" Sv P I t< 'p!°.P_ • I-'( 3 fi WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an .election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qua for annexation equal in num last state general election to determine whether such Washington, in which there i should be annexed to the Ci Revised Code of Washington. If the undersigned have req regulations, it is recogniz than sixty days after the f time for the review of the p Signature: 7. Name: (Print Signature: 8. Name: (Print) 1 ELECPET r 1.1 • u •VI\ 1 VIA I1N1\LArt •vi• _,AP"Arg TO THE CI Y OF TUKWILA, WASHING1uA (Election Method) TO THE CIT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: The territory proposed to b= annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, a tached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." 4. Name: (Print) rNjt L r0 - Q f S ignature: - 74e / _�' 4•L L- 5. Name: (Print) d.. �Q yld�Q /�' G - 73?5 L1 6. Name: (Print) L,I C r Al ' filytocillialii Signature: ��,f,�_ 77'l -� ified electors resident in the territory proposed er to ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the therein, do hereby call for an election to be held area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, s estimated to be registered voters, y of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the ested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning d and accepted that the meeting date may be later - iling of this request in order to ensure adequate oposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one o a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read th = above or attached text and prayer of the petition. and consents to the filing if other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up th ough the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County P osecuting Attorney. (Names of the.'etitioners should be in identical form as the same a'pear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER // DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1. Name: (Print) dze . fithi z' - - » " 3.i /vcT So y Gk,Signature: 4054s4 ■4.1! 2. Name: (Print) 2) 0 ci y t4 c) (1 er G Signature: ` __. 4 ` ,,,� 3. Name: (Print) -- Signatur —)s J"i�oa -3�T�# la ve�� 631/— �� � )q 7 - ire. f/ ) 4& 3, a' A‘aLS- 1.C44 ) & SO 14 . v 3 4/-4f s 3ar% I' / %/ WARNING Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise . not qualified to sign; or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. O Name: 2. Name: (Print) 6k Signature: 17,k.3. Name: ( TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED (Print)E.e Cor ..„ des? / � r / /'G - rci►iavn rvn nnncAMiaun TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING)ud (Election Method) .-Signatur;)-0%6 4. Name: (PrintiTeme Signature: d,k.5. Name: (P Signatu o g, 6. Name: (Print) E LIY) / ,L ay P S ° 7 Signature: 0 Name: (Print) Signature: 0 Name: (Print) 'Signature: t uit_ �Llue ELECPET. 1 / -1i-ge /9r/ 3- Pl..c ` ° /4 fr t/ -6--YY j V / S' 12,171 b y 1/ ' ••t'y iolV7 ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # ."4,e / '/O/ 5V4 7 Jggo3 < - 33 ?/ S6 6f/(( i i/f n -3e' PI Se.. . r..k4 L4. e: :' / /C4' WARNING Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. itc7 OU�1 2. oLSignature: 3. Name: (Print) C Si gnature: .Signature. 5. Name: (Prin ELECPET REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print) LISA 1 Signature: bmi, 1'0,(1 Name: (Print) Erik/ &.SA i!SL1(�) 4. Name: (PrintCraht ____Ids At 4 y w I ZW /iMs /i O T 6. Name: tint) 1 ... •..v.• . VI\ r151511. nn, •V.. ok.. Signature: , ,; D a / - 7 7. Name: (Print) ka , - 2 f 0 4,c Signature. 8. Name: (Printk41 44 cj .ai k1 pr O .Signatureer ,) 6j WARNING TO THE / CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTur 8 (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) ory DATE SIGNED I IA l /g5i tl- 11 -it fi // - 88 1/— $� ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 3.301- S. 131& Seams. ` a i (053' 3232 SO. l67 Si+ . &Octett klok.c81(0g Z "V S i3�. 9( /( Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at.the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is-within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. Name: (Print) O\-Signature: TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER 2. Name: (P Int) iifiei4e. £3. v55 clignature: ..i_ 0 1-ita- , 3. Name: (Print) 4/ g Q.& Signature: 4. Name: (Print G1 5. Name: (Pr n o.- Signatur -• G 6. Name: (Pri t Q Signatur : ELECPET rtitiiur ruK ANNtAAILUN TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASNINGTOr. (Election Method) ill 7 DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # /3 6 0 3 e• 6 +�. LL // -/.9- /poly 2 7. Name: (Print)e J Signature: & T- '' i9 8. Name: (Print) gJfie .,.. ��� c r Si g n ature:.,,, .�-..� WARNING i9 4;4.. 35/A 3/ (e3 .3 21 , I 47 S 1 3; P 3- Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.O2O of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED 4 Name: (Print) L1,')(10Con /0 Signature: ____ t,q) ac viu J 2. Name: (Print) n7 .01 /I -3.11 14.. 3. Name: (Print) i g f Mr 4 PAMPAW— 4. Name: (Print),?Wt: 04- S ignature" —7 7 , y � - 4 ' ._-- 5. Name: (Print) Al 1 AI -' MIi, LOER 0 1 A 0 s ignature: ��5 � 3. 4- cr?► -Sr 6. Name: (Print) 24).4 : 1 ' / �'/.2 —,�(� 1/5 Q— Signature: 7. Name: (Print) IL_E 7'.) k ) /1 -2 -, 9 Signature: rinL►d G9 pt, 8. Name: (Print) oK Signature: ELECPET rG i l i ivn rvn NnICANI LJlI TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) //-22'88 ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 30 s.i 3 6'f` - ? /- .».� 3213 )6 3�1 a7 ,. /e /a '4 '4 r—N, •� . 9'4 I/LI 3 ,P/_, 'cc the 'id/ 1l /ZrK I i/Z13 3" e EfaE1011134_26g WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10x) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. Name: (Print) 0 I It - it /la l8� Lqal 3 3 O�Signature: � / .yu � J s �� �c', �'('II qr� 8' 2. Name: (Print) tt� /((a /a-- U /4 1- (*Signature 3. Name: (Print) ji t . iL Name: (Print) Ju,yu ra= .S.g AmA tcoA) / / - /a-kk Signature: 5. Name: (Pr otSignatur 6. Name: (Print) 0- Signature: 04‹. Signature: ELECPET REGISTERED VOTER rt i i i tun rut' A1711t11AI IUPI TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTUr (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # S' c?.2) 4L) a- WS V /4(.106-J1 ,, 9(6 d /4/ Lo 4 2 9 So. r / / l/ yy 37 2 ci sP ( 4 2 ■-. 7. Name: (Print) Lo Y 1NC •R. /3-gsis t03/1 37 J s, 0 IA Signature: j_ttlp:. /e. 8. Name: (Print) 1 ' l 11 -/3 /2 - 3 >' c6 WARNING 1 1 Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ELECPET PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHIN6TOn� (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10x) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER 1 G k ame : (Pr i nt)6Mn p/ J fl'4L�' if /a ; ; /4 /n —.? 7 ' 1 Ar✓ &_1D, Signatur 2. Name: (Print) pI Signatu 3. Name: (P rint)Sf1z,� -4 Z _ I ,,,5" 1 Signature 4. Name: (Print) / ?f D A ✓ ; t i)0 ,at /1(c /9 — 00-- Signature: r7:! 5. Name: (Print) ) ,.0 ii/4- � d Muhl( ij - - 3N 7 s24`:0' 0( Signature: 6. Name: (Print) D&VA r1 ► ;trire1) 11-12--S I3i'O.7 11 S, Signature; 7. Name: (Print) Signature: �I e�/ f 8. Name: (Print) �, (J y a , lc�1 // - /5$? 7- IS ,r• OK Signature: DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # /4 WARNING Every person who signs. this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. F'tl 11 tun ruK AnntAAI IUn TO 4&.02 3 CITY OF TUKWILAA, , wASMIN6TOn (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print ) / ?t_Q; - d1< Signature:, ,,c- ,y664110., 2. Name: (Print) fieirv-ii W)teeker Signature: 3. Name: (Print) l *Signature: 4. Name: (Pr C Signature: 5. Name: (Print)t CA Signature: 6. Name: (Print),O7id 4e / a /.,11 Ok S i g n at u re : f �;,� i . � t ae 7. Name: (Print) Signature: 60 0 a Name: (Print) • /11E k-�e I - afti - Caw WARNING Signature: D ATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # J /- -13 ---F' /,-7/ 519 S —35 AVe So d Q a, n 36 - c - S 334 -- 3 S -4 S' S� 79/ G 8 /3Z 4e ..?5 "k= re/hi • Every person who signs_this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ELECPET Signature: 8. Name: (Print Signature: ELECPET PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (1011) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1. Name: (Print)(,., t- ad b',ct:,' //' "3 17/55S/31772.:: Signature:e, Q' 2. Name: (Print) / /4A t 7 1/43-191 /0 de 4 3. Name: (Print) ,me / Jfl /4rJp. // /3-n Signature: OCJ4b..a, 9 ice-1(4-11 4. Name: (Print )(W PVC\ Signature: 5. Name: (Print)T4-7 L Signature 6. Name: (Print)V,;iSrNiw 3 Signature:y;,„• f FT: Name: (Print) `Uvhrnk. L L ei. Signature _ 1.. .. AraAre r /03-1g WARNING /333 33 I 394 -/% eS 3 a a s4 /. /1)4- 98 /66 3:./o1 /3o St • / 9�7 - 3y `41%4,4S fOLR Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. -Signature: 4. Name: (Print) Signature: ELECPET Signature: Signature: Name: (Print) . Signatur PEIIILUN FUR ANNEXATION TO THE , CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING1,i (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED . Name: (Print) -(/) / #Lwetr,u Signature: 2". Name: (Print) JEFF C-Wf=ertlo ./ - j `,� Signature: /./ - a, ( 3: Name: (Print) -r /2 rre,'a$ //-airs( /32070 4,,.•/,74y All co 7 . Name: (Print) c Lou ce la45,211 ,A(!!i i 1 ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # : Sau 4 (.tea.. ? 7W Name: (Prin �fl�d /T /9 / ;/ // ,,- I, ie/se,, 4` � Signatur . ;i i 8�.C7% • `f;. Name: (Pr nt) / 4 (JL _ A �� . 1 ) '/-� i1 -1Z-4 ,32/3 Ai 7 6 , P TIAN 1/- /8 -F‘ apd 6 S /3 3 v -/348 /3zatiio/ r ity 4/SO, Sea& X6 %6 WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) ;\ Name: (Print) Signature: 2. Name: (Print) Signatu e: Name: Signature: Signat ELECPET I"tiLILUN rUK ANNtAAflUN TO 02 6 CITY OF TUKWILAA, , � WASHIN6T6,4 (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 88 /3 /r-2,4,ry 5 S,E rrtc; L 4 9' /d r (Print) 6041 -7 ,TND /! . /OW TI/eP Sitter (i2d1-40--%:71 ti (" ,L � � l � ' //C "WET 1S4 LN.(Z Z/ A- 136of Mbar . Aot Wet, 11'161 13// Pc Wa_ Name: (Print ure. Name: (Print) leImbe#4 Signature: await] Name: (Print) , etsSS Signature: 41 Name: (Print Signature: 81. Name: (Print Signatur ) JF,,v 14/6-475#,I it/Ark • 9P /6i- /i /S/ WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ov 2. We, the undersigned, as qualified ,electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1: Name: (Print) � tarot J1 Lwan "/13/g9 a0 ;: _3.. Signature:\ Signature: , 45 - : (Pri ELECPET Signature Name: (Print) Signature: Signature TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTOtN (Election Method) Name: (PrintL5,lSar,44 4L1(va✓ I( /' - s'‹ . Signatur • Name: (Print)1, Name: (Print)E•1.„...4 t (/ L,,, ca . /i• /3' 88 Signature: e-_.- Name: (P r i nt) L1 G, L.Gt.✓Sn1 / / - /J-f Signature :. ��iL d C, e Name: (Print) i rL nt � -,v c= ,yyo, 2g19 33 ] 5 1Q62'{ , -+ Ave SU tE{e , t a r( 9 g e -d S t o,/(1 i / vs/66 Ys =3 -4. sJ Spa . VJc.,7k' /U )10:17s33'*:z;AL / 4 ys /� . 611E 14'5 ? /0 I is = 33 f p/ f i WARNING Every person who signs-this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. A:. Name: (Print 2. Name: (Print Signature. 3. Name: (Print Signatur 4. Name: (Print) Signature: REGISTERED 5. Name: (Print) Signature: 6. Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: 8. Name: (Print) Signature: ELECPET. 11.1 • 1 •VIII 1 %/I\ 111.1.►.AI1U •VI\ TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTGI. (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: VOTER We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of'the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # air gy /17/ atr #64 S"4' A . AL4Vet. 9P" /` /21/7/ ,J7.r Ord4d -S WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. 0 Signature` 5. Name: (Print) O . Signature: ELECPET PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # T. Name: (Print) MctrkR./4 / iq f �`8' 351`f 50, 1Lt n d. Signature:Y7tit,(Z 42. Name: (Print) 7 Signature: „,/,g 3 . Name: (Print)61% L_ , • Signature: den. ,,,,.= 4. Name: (PrintRolflzt S Lt may //i 351q 50, f cm /3 3-`l 5 Pi Yf1 m0 '► :� so- 6. Name: (Print)N reci / - /$ ')1 L / O sS ignature: �� .4012 Q ,� 7 . Name: (Print)7`; /ft/ (f s fi t c / / 4 6 w w 1514 - - Signature: • WARNING Every person who signs, this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Ok.Signature: Z!t. ... /2' Old Signature: J . 4. Name: (Print Ca?�d `� Signature: 5. Name: (Print) oK Signature: °IC Signature: C) 1G$ignature: ELECPET 8. Name: (Print 1 H rtIIILUN rUK ANNEXATION ._ TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1. Name: (Print)/ R 9/ y /y/{/ /t / 0-dq - der 3455 5 °' /5l 4 41-3 di-Signature* � 2. Name: (Print)/re / /Al 1) 1/04a,r // / - S� ,34576"- 310 /4 !/* /z 3. Name: (Print) ? c -ia. 2 5 1 ) / e ' 4 /Y L/ / 6. Name: (Print),7;.‘ ANciA \ 7. e: ( ' Gk, Sig j/ #3 WARNING Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. rLtiiluii run r,IIl An11V1I TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: 3 I We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up, through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1. Name: (Print))14AglorL 1 5 ' 421.2.-LxEff 2y. /2 /. 0 Signature: 6,&6 2. Name: (Print) ; 7' 0, _ Signature: 3. Name: (Print) Uk Signature: 4. Name: (Print) 5. Name: (Print) 14e` Signature 6. Name: (Print) Ai v _ � f • 7. Name: (Print) ri rtc►a {�ol Siam• 11. "8$ O� Signature: `T'o am V S. Name: (Print) /'Ylarsh4t ijn, -s t *Signature: }" ELECPET 33( S. 1 Licfi Si itiaLtd4 98162 46 S WARNING Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. ELECPET ..1i1 a 6. Name: (Print) Signature: 1 . Name: (Print) Signature: 8. Name: (Print) .J sa,e ., 6 /; PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) Name: (Print)77:74W o• SDYT• Signature:' , 0 --- 5. Name: (Print) IA444. J. - B4:7 - 7m - Signature. E _ _ � 7 Signature: . WARNING /Z - /o rr TO THE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: . oS/W7fL� � 3 01 We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # # /4/, 1. Name: (Print )SAdag- A.Af g si gnature !� d'1204, 2. Name: (Print)erimitrir V,g /{2.10_6v Signature: 3. Name: (Print) VIGIL L. (3ovr 1, Signature: --SX4rIZE, Uhl r / /G/& .6L) l* od f C� TT« (4,4. / /(€4s- 2 /a ANC. J.. .TC,4774 �- a fr�sr. //4 VS -.t4 4 ' S. eat- 11 cA& /Z -/. — . .•tAttee. /41.441. 9cP/G P* /3 727 3 7 14 1 /11,—/D ,t$ la) 3 7A 4/ 444 , S t _<ip apt-4y 9 Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory proposed for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10 %) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later - than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) 1. Name: (Print) %4•4.t Aidz4 /Z• -// Fe Signature: 2 . Name: (Print) i )/ I ,L 1 C A / e / l s «- I I - '9 Signature: 1 f [' . 3. Name: (Print) Signature: 4. Name: (Print) Signature: 5. Name: (Print) 8. Name: (Print) . Signature ELECPET REGISTERED VOTER TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGT0m (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: 14.4414%011 1 Vfl 0111414.4,0114%411 WARNING DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 6. Name: (Print) Mcargcr 3V4/42 IL' ) 1 41/44 Z/// /4 7. Name: (PrintAVILea; -# 33 Every person who signs - this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. CITY GF ti IMI1A We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in th e�_tac.r for annexation equal in number to ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) REGISTERED VOTER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # 1. Name: (P r i nt) 5-S t6 i #✓{'z- -124#, l Bock 15S _ . Signature: Q i 4settemat Name: (Print) Signature: 3. Name: (Print Signature: 4. Name: (Print Signature. / 5. Name: (Print) i 'F5 �i�f}/ '` /'f'i1 9 r 313. Signature: 0„,„;)t.: 6. Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: 8. Name: (Print) Signature: ELECPET PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE ) CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA - 61a4J/ 5CHMAUrZ G� Q-VQtJ IM V ku 1 !23,i zT. 11 MAR28 - 354 So 3?03 So (3 2 s l le C IMe 1 WARNING Every person who signs -this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. CITY .. �r 1 - i CITY C c, We, the undersigned, as qualified electors resident in the territory pro for annexation equal in number No ten percent (10%) of the votes cast at the last state general election therein, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area, lying contiguous to the City of Tukwila, Washington, in which there is estimated to be registered voters, should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as folows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." If the undersigned have requested the simultaneous adoption of proposed zoning regulations, it is recognized and accepted that the meeting date may be later than sixty days after the filing of this request in order to ensure adequate time for the review of the proposed zoning regulation. This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one petition seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration) Signature: 2. Name: (Prin Signature: 3. Name: (Print) Signature: 4. Name: (Print) ( - 4N birr~ire- Signature: 5. Name: (P r i n t) BARAcA'R ahla4 lew Signature: 6. Name: (Prin SOVN 1 Netvm Signature: BM" ,f 1 . Name: (Prindli , _j • K ELECPET •, ' PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON' (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWIL REGISTERED VOTER Signature: .44) 8. Name: (P r i n e• AL f/I1MMA/ Signature: - WARNING DATE SIGNED ADDRESS AND TAX LOT # el( a0 135' " / 3 5� la. IQI1olg8 MAR 28 iv 3 30°.-ec 4'1y /69 43616 30 ia1L 8 -rios /AA. n 17/.2 azit wA laoor d6 Av a 5 Mit 104 I aoo5 c210 Lfrtso. Agar POI 2L' ct _ Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 1989 6:5K -kh-t i �APPLI CA ON DATE FILE NUMBER] PROJECT NAME 1 ADDRESS FR LE APPLICANT I CROSS REFERENCE ACTION 3/24/89 89 -1 -BLA VALLEY VIEW ESTATES BOUNDED BY 53RD AVENUE S., SLADE WAY & KLICKITAT DRIVE PUGET WESTERN 4/18/89 89 -2 -BLA GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER BOUNDED BY N.E. CORNER OF INTERURBAN AVENUE S. & GATEWAY DRIVE - LOT 3 JOE LAYMAN BEDFORD PORPERTIES APPROVED 6/6/89 89 -3 -BLA HITTLE BOUNDED BY 1/2 OF LOT 9, ALL OF LOT 1C HELLWIGS ADDITION TO FOSTER. CRAIG HITTLE 243 -4173 APPROVED 6/26/89 89 -4 -BLA STRETCH 12822 - 37TH S. JAMES STRETCH TRANSFER FROM KING COUNTY 6/26/89 APPROVED 7/3/89 89 -5 -BLA FAIRVIEW CENTER S.E. CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE S. & INTER- URBAN AVENUE S. IN S.E. 14 -23 -4 PARK PROPERTIES 88 -13 -DR /EPIC - 29-88/ 88 -4 -SMP .. 7/20/89 89 -6 -BLA KING'S RESTAURANT PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH BRUCE MORGAN, APPROVED 8/10/89 7/26/89 89 -7 -BLA SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. 6530, 6532, 6534, 6536, 6538 S. 153 S•. H.C. BLOSS TUKWILA S.E. 23 -23 -4 SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. 89 -2 -V DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL 8/30/89 89 -8 -BLA SEAGATE CORP WEST OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, NORTH OF ROBERT HUNT iDUTH2OFEASwA2FAE ;INGINAL WAY, BEDFORD PROPERTIES 9/28/89 89 -9 -BLA GLOVER - 14622 - 46th S. CLARENCE GLOVER APPROVED 10/18/89 10/18/89 89 -10 -BLA PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A 17501 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TRAMMELL CROW CORP. APPROVED 12/26/89 ' 11/9/89 89 -11 -BLA POWELL HOME BUILDERS 55TH /144TH ST. BRET POWELL 89 -4 -SS APPROVED 12/1/89 12/4/89 89 -12 -BLA SRO 15820 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S. MICHAEL AIPPERSBACH 1 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 1989 6:5K -kh-t v'w er* MIL/TARN! RD , Aq , s 15A st # s ae sr SEE /1/41.50: Mf gam a— cork _52.8% rW 39-3 -R CJSWA%. tht3/4 t4JE)(?TIOII RM2400.P iRCI• 3600) E' . amai6 RS730 A t :74.7F. — : 2 0 .3. 1 F . , 1•Cj.T.l • " • 1---" 11" • rIC; • ,„,„ . • • • P' .. -" __, „4 • • :.:. ' '..-- • , ' _ 7-.. ,,.; -,,..,..., ,--• , ,, ,--•-•-' 3-, ..;:.,.....,1,T __,'.' ' :, _,-„,•_ "..•- \. ;.'.•:i- 1 :•!",::.1 i ...-TT:3 \ j , ....”..... ','' ' 7: -. • .'",--..: ■••• ' •=:, 1,A! . I 1,, , , ,. '..• ..,:..,2, --.,-- ..... — '----:.. , ,-,—,— , man ,7 --, . .„•• ,,, :. ; .-: .1 ' •;.! . .. '''. `, ,, :E P.:-.•:.....5. . .., . • `^ " ' (RM - - , 7 i"-ANITC1,•,t3 . 9• 7 F • : •••-, ' 1.77.,!.., ."" —, •41• -- , t-• '., 1 'r.7.7.:E... .-''' , H i,l ''' :1; ' - '7 ";4 %1 ' +' ' •:, 6 1,01,iit?1,)p ' , •■=.4 11 r., 1-' . 7.-: 'c "-- i ';. . .: • . 1... . .. 1,0 . , , , F V t ..., : 174' , !; (3 4 .-'t . .1, ' 1 1'' . : 14 . , , 14: . ,, Ilf- - — : .. -; ' ' . .1 1 ' .. 1' 1 . 117 1 l'' I 5' 67 4 ri' t l'';':::.:.:' I :....... :61,1 Lt__2_v,. - i i ie - t.....ii: LO, . v..,. .. -•-.....i SL , r. *, ' '-'-. " ';'rar — 1,1,_ . , Li y j:LT . 7 [ q......rritITM:z:frit 6',f ,1 ; 4 1" 4 " . •^ ------ '1 4 ''' i,... '7,, 1. 0 1 F.., °I,. '' '''' 7 ',—‘-_,, ' •fl i... ,....• .,7 INI - ,. • ,L , , i.7 I ; ,.. ,.: . ,,Y i :1 1 7 ...... ps , 11:_i_■ ,..,... .--... , - . ,.. F 'Qr.; G VIE o ''%"'..':'-- :".• F r ,e4 P4- 71 : ::? 21:9: N; T :L ril.":''Irr.:111,1,.....1 : - 1 ' a ■•••••••••-..... !.1...,- i• ,. '''' • ' ! - . - 7-kr• -- - —p,7.• . ,..1&•; . . ......-..'-';' C 'd.-17‘1151 .,..,P-: ''. p1 •.•.. ,,.,..„ r pt.,- .,; . • , • ,, CC • 4, 'vr,:71....., '1, -0 - Yl 11.:44 ..... , ...... RD -..:--L.. _ -._ .„ 1 . 17,... • • J ::::\■ •':;.P • • • • ‘ • '. ''"' ';'' • I :f: • 1 .11 r . ,=71 .___ ÷'-.-- '11: - j--- ti -.'.:::la : ? I ''''''.\\ 1 ! ., H - •• ;;:t. 15 :'' .. 1:1 .. : : :: : 7 LI 1. ,__:•_,,th• . •, ,• - I- .. :1 , ;..,f 1. .1,. .).,,...:: • :i . L illi4irldY11=2',1, , Fii-L-: - -- - - ); f. , r'i- ,-,9e•-•-• ''• . .•c '••=,--'-e•;:.-:-.4c1- • ' •.• ,..2 .:-.•;---,--r,..•••: i, af. :::•:: -- :73,, 'moo ----:,..,:, - -•-•: . ., , .;:,.... 11 - 4,, .,...,... ,...4, , 0- • • • - - • .... .■:• "•• ••. , .:) j .:). ,. :2 " ..,,?.. :0 --- v . ; 4 2 . : =- - -; lk i . I t , i. !Th )1 A,. ' ' . 1 . 2 '... r:11--..:11.2 0 -: :1 1°4:', - •-__•._1 .-.2.,-, -4F4 .• • 7' ; ,.,, , ',"'" • 1411600' ":•-•:C":". ;1: tiM9° ilM 900 , • • • • , • . , •- '' .• 5 900' • • - • f. • • ' 4 ,1 80 •P , • M2 4 0 T-T . _ -.'-• •111:4 2400 • , *,,,:•.• ‘''' '" t - • - •_- • kj t,t - t,-, :Lt • •, oar -.—' ;•:. .... ,,,-,„-:,,.:, : / . 14 At ,, „. i.,;,1, , :! i ■ i• 5 1,-:-.i -..::; L :: 'il n : - .6 ' ''.!: 3 441r.- 1P.: ° ,?■ 31). — 7 .■ :1 [ S j46 HI Stlf ,_,. ' 11 itir--t ,z G. ' s. , L . , . , : :••,,,,,, : S 148010', Jt •••-• 5 ..i •-(1''' • ". , ,,_, ,t, r 4 ,..,A_.! -,..., 7„...„.1::.:■1i.v. .,o.i.,h.,;..,svt!r._7_;i.:•'iT:,.;:.",.ij:,,,,,-.7.r.;•'.:9_.,'.:L.:„;?,,•.;:;':ri:7''::::)i',_ ...„,,,,'", p Ne,-- --; 1 '•7": : :: / E4'ib,•,:i!,i, ;.1;i_l • . 1",...1- ..1 Q • ":• 41.1141 . ;;r; 1. 46'1 S :: 12-24 t 1. 7•iii -1 1 - ... •_.:.'r b• i 4o .47Td,• .DY/A.,_,•., .. .. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMPPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111 0 *,.•.... 1 7 3 a a 10 11 -..— 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • I I I I i . ' ... 0 I- 1,1tIt.-1 1 ATTAC.N. KING COUNTY ZONING RS-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 6/AC RD 360D - LOW DENSITY MULTI FAMILY 12/AC R6 2400 MEDIUM DENSITY 18/AC R• 1800 HIGH DENSITY 24/AC 611 9D0 MAXIMUM DENSITY 48/AC GC GENERAL COMMERCIAL BC COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN NEIGHBORHOOD BUS DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT CROSS F RDERENCE ACTION 3/24/89 89-1-BLA .VALLEY VIEW ESTATES • BOUNDED BY 53RD AVENUE S., SLADE WAY & KLICKITAT DRIVE PUGET WESTERN 4/18/89 89-2-8LA GATEWAY CORPORATE CENTER BOUNDED BY N.E. CORNER OF INTERURBAN AVENUE S. & GATEWAY DRIVE - LOT 3 JOE LAYMAN BEDFORD PORPERTIES APPROVED 6/6/89 89-3-DLA HITTLE BOUNDED BY 1/2 OF LOT 9, ALL OF LOT 1C HELLWlGS'ADDITION TO FOSTER. CRAIG HITTLE 243-4173 APPROVED 6/26/89 89-4-BLA STRETCH . . 12822 - 37TH S. JAMES STRETCH TRANSFER FROM KING COUNTY 6/26/89 . APPROVED 7/3/89 89-5-nLA FAIRVIEW CENTER S.E. CORNER OF 58TH AVENUE S. & INTER- URBAN AVENUE S. IN S.E. 14-23-4 PARK PROPERTIES 88-13-DR/[P[C-29;48/ 88-4-SMP - 7/20/89 89-6-BLA KING'S RESTAURANT PACIFIC HIGHWAY SOUTH BRUCE N0KGAN APPROVED 8/10/89 7/26/89 89-7-8LA SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC' 6630, 6532, 6534, 6536, 6538 S. 163 S TUKWILA S.E. 23-23-4 . H.C. BLOSS SCHNEIDER HOMES, INC. 89-2-V DENIED BY CITY COUNCIL 8/30/89 89-8-8LA SEAGATE CORP WEST OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, NORTH OF �8-��2 �r u � Sx N8 x�� MARGINAL WAY, `oU'n 8 ww� I mm� I «�v ROBERT HUNT BEDFORD PROPERTIES 9/28/89 89-9-BLA GLOVER - 14522 - 46th S. ' CLARENCE GLOVER APPROV[D 10/18/89 10/18/89 89-10-DLA PACIFIC NORTHWEST GROUP A 17501 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TRAMMELL CROW CORP. , APPROVED 12/28/89 11/9/89 89-11-BLA POWELL HOME BUILDERS 65TH/144TH ST. BRET POWELL 89_4_SS APPROVED 12/1/89 12/4/89 89-12-DLA ' SRO 16820 PACIFIC HIGHWAY S. MICHAEL AIPPERSBACH • BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT 1989 � /�� w,_ . _t ^ ' -'