HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 88-03-CA - CITY OF TUKWILA - RIVERTON ANNEXATION CODE AMENDMENT88-3-CA 88-03-ca
RIVERTON ANNEXATION / ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF TUKWILA
WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. , ('/
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OE TUKWILA AMENDING THE
TUKWILA ZONING CODE AND PROVIDING SAID AMENDMENTS SHALL
BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA
OF THE AREA KNOWN AS THE RIVERTON ANNEXATION AREA.
WHEREAS, a Petition has been filed proposing that the hereinafter
described area be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and
WHEREAS, the City Council in Ordinance No. /7 7 has amended the
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map for the area and in Ordinance
No. /lM has provided for zoning regulations and a zoning map for the
area in the event of annexation, and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to provide for certain amendments to the zoning
regulations in the event such annexation should occur, and
WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of
significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been
prepared and issued, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 28, 1988
and on August 2, 1988, recommended amending the Zoning Code in the event of
annexation, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings
on August 15, 1988 and September 19, 1988, to consider the recommendations of
the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to adopt the findings and
recommendations of the Planning Commission as to such amendments to the Zoning
Code.
Section 1. Area Affected. The area which is the subject of the
annexation petition is known as the Riverton Annexation Area and is as
described in Exhibit A hereto.
Section 2. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said
described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila,
Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows:
4078C2
WHEREAS, the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Page 1
A. Section 18.38.020(7) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
(7) Manufacturing, processing and /or assembling previously prepared
metals including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or
punching of metal, 40 0 #00e4144 4407410 0 0144 i4 W444001
engraving, galvanizing and handforging.
B. Section 18.38 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to
reflect the addition of the following:
18.38.070 Performance Standards. Use, activity, or operations within
a structure shall not emit odor, noise, dust, smoke, gas or vibration
which are discernible to a person at normal sensitivities at the edge
of the property. Use, activity, or operations within a structure shall not
violate existing State and Federal Environmental Standards.
C. Section 18.40.020(8) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
(8) Manufacturing, processing and /or assembling previously prepared
metals $ Oi#)E404 including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing,
shearing or punching of metal, diisf 444444144 1/$ WA 14 0104444i
engraving, galvanizing, and handforging.
D. Section 18.40 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to
reflect the addition of the following:
18.40.070 Performance Standards. Use, activity, or operations within
a structure shall not emit odor, noise, dust, smoke, gas or vibration
which are discernible to a person at normal sensitivities at the edge
of the property. Use, activity, or operations within a structure shall not
violate existing State and Federal Environmental Standards.
E. The minimum setback requirements for all C -M Industrial Park
developments which are adjacent to a residential use district shall be fifty
feet (50') and Table 1 referred to in Section 18.50.020 of the Tukwila
Municipal Code shall be amended as provided in Exhibit B attached hereto and •
incorporated herein.
F. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted
outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in
that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of
Interstate 5 and the area of the City zoned M -1 and located generally
south and west of the Duwamish River, generally south and east of
Pacific Highway South and north of South 125th Street as shown on
Map 2
G. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 and
Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.040 to include areas as shown on Exhibit C.
H. Section 18.50.040 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
4078C2
Section 18.50.040 Building Height Exceptions Up to and Including 115
Feet. Authorization of building height greater than the heights
contained in Section 18.50.020 (Table 1) up to and including 115 feet
in the areas of the City as designated on Map 2, shall be made by the
Planning Commission acting as the Board of Architectural Review
pursuant to the guidelines and procedures specified in Chapter 18.60.
Any application for a proposed structure exceeding 100 feet in
overall height and located north of Interstate 405 shall be submitted
to the Federal Aviation Administration for an advisory report. The
report of the FAA shall be submitted to the BAR as part of the Staff
Report.
Page 2
I. Section 18.52.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to
reflect the addition of the following:
(4) Fifteen feet of landscaping shall be provided when a
nonresidential development in a C -M Industrial Park district abuts
residential uses. This landscaping shall be outside of any fence used to
prevent access to the development in a C -M - Industrial Park.
J. Section 18.60.030(2) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended
to reflect the addition of the following:
Section 3. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the
Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after
publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this L � day
of , 1988.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
a - 4044_4_0"-Q_
TY�MAXINE ANDERSON
APPRO ' AS TO FORM:
OFFI OF
By
FI WITH . THE CITY CLERK: /b - 3 - S' S
PA SED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: /0
PUBLISHED: /D - J3 • ?
EFFECTIVE DATE: /o1'
ORDINANCE NO.: /9(,f7
4078C2
CI w ATTO
Page 3
(H) Any nonresidential development occurring adjacent to residential
use districts.
EXHIBIT A
RIVERTON
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
12 AUG 88 REV.
Beginning at the intersection of the east margin of East Marginal
Way South and the north line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation Claim
No. 37 in the southwest 1/4 of Section 10, T23N, R4E, W.M.;
thence southeasterly along said east margin of East Marginal Way,
442.30 feet to the south line of Tract 22, Riverside Interurban
Tracts as recorded in Volume 10, Page 74 of Plats, Records of King
County, WA, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
thence easterly along said south line of Tract 22 and the . easterly
prolongation thereof to the west line of the Puget Sound Electric
Railway right - of-way;
thence southerly along the west line of said right -of -way, 850 feet
more or less to a point opposite the south line of Tract 33 of said
Riverside Interurban Tracts;
thence east along the easterly prolongation of the south line of
said Tract 33 to the thread of the Duwamish River;
thence along said thread to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South;
thence southwesterly along said east margin and the southerly
extension thereof 460 feet more or less to the southwest margin. of
Interurban Avenue South;
thence northwesterly along said southwest margin to an intersection
with the southerly extension of the west margin of 42nd Avenue
South;
thence southerly along said west margin of 42nd Avenue South
contiguous with the Tukwila City Limits as set forth under King
County Commissioner's Resolution No. 23309 dated 10 -11 -61 (Tukwila
Ordinance 276), to the south margin of South 131st Street;
thence westerly along said south margin and continuing westerly
along the north line of Tract 58 of said Riverside Interurban
Tracts to the east margin of South 131st Place (East Marginal Way
South);
thence southeasterly along said east margin and easterly along the
north margin of South 133rd Street,respectively, to the west margin
of 42nd Avenue South;
thence southerly along the southerly extension of said west margin
to the south margin of South 133rd Street;
thence easterly along the easterly extension of said south margin
of South 133rd Street to the east margin of 42nd Avenue South;
thence southerly and continuing in a southeasterly direction along
the northerly margin of South 135th Street to the northwesterly
line of the southeasterly 1.86 acres of Tract 14, In Fostoria
Garden Tracts as recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, page 95, records of
King County, WAb
thence north 40 17 east along said north line 220.32 feet;
thence south 49 east, 91.43 feet to the northwesterly line of
the southeasterly 0.86 acres of said Tract 14;
thence north 40'17' east, a distance of 132.89 feet;
thence south 49 east, 10 feet;
thence north 40 ° 17' east, 119.11 feet;
-2-
thence southeasterly along the southwest margin of South 134th
Street 150 feet more or less to the southwesterly extension of the
southeast margin of 47th Avenue South (formerly Adams Avenue);
thence northeasterly along said southwesterly extension and
southeast margin, respectively, to the west line of Primary State
Highway No. 1 condemned under Superior Court Cause No. 618283
records of King County;
thence southerly along said west line to an intersection with the
easterly extension of the south line of the Cyrus C. Lewis Donation
Claim No. 37;
thence westerly along said easterly extension and along said south
line, respectively, to the west margin of Macadam Road South (46th
Avenue South);
thence southerly along said west margin and continuing south along
the west margin of 46th Avenue South to the north margin of South
139th Street (formerly Hill Avenue);
thence westerly along said north margin to the west line of Lot 23
of Block 3 in Riverton Macadam road Tracts, recorded in Volume 15,
Page 53 of Plats, Records of King County, WA;
thence northerly along said west line to the easterly prolongation
of the north margin of South 139th Street;
thence westerly along said easterly prolongation and said north
line to the east margin of Pacific Highway South (Highway 99);
thence northerly along said east margin to the thread of the
Duwamish River;
thence easterly along said thread of the Duwamish River to the west
line of Section 10, T23 N, R4E;
thence southerly along said west line to the south line of the
north 1168.66 feet of said Section 10;
thence easterly along said south Iine to the west margin of East
Marginal Way South;
thence southerly along said west margin to its intersection with
the north line of Lot 1 of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as
recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930;
thence westerly along said north line of Lot 1 and its extension
to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat;
thence southerly along the west line thereof to the Southwest
corner of said Short Plat;
thence easterly along the south line of Lot 4 In said Short Plat to
the extended east line of Lot 16, Block 4 of Riverton Addition as
recorded in Vol. 13 of Plats, Page 36, records of King County, WA;
thence southerly along said extension and east line, and the east
line of Lot 9 to the north margin of South 124th Street;
thence easterly along said north margin and along the easterly
prolongation thereof to the east margin of East Marginal Way South;
thence southerly along said east margin to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
DISTRICT
Ni
MINIMUM
LOT SIZE
(SQ. FT.)
MINIMUM
AREA REQUIRED
PER UNIT
(SQ. FT.)
MAXIMUM
BUILDING
HEIGHT
(IN FEET)
FRONT YARD
(
AREA RETIREMENTS
SETBACKS
- r .
• •
•R•. a unt.
•
* cat • [ Ill ,
'• r.
OuW/
• t .
ckti
• ..•..r, •
tr i ''' '°° ' I
vii /. //A .F !
� •m1azes • =. 13L• •
•
1-.0•111111=1,1
4' .14 -
. - ra ` Ina
9 .1 :
111 •• I 'K' o '""•
•i•1 1�.4.. i •r.1
i
• b
Ill' -' • � +^7 u 1,
1 YA
�•� "' —fit• 'be,
•
ALLOWABLE HEIGHT UP TO 115 FEET
:'; . "..-Ir:::#17.--411
_ i, .
* yam � r f'
S
7 •
J 3�
•
ZYr
Ntle
1.•
.4 •
71 117-
ATTACHMENT I
•
EXHIBIT . 0 . •
TUKWILA PROPOSED HEIGHT EXCEPTION AREA
y J
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1800
Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor
RIVERT.ON ANNEXATION
PUBLIC HEARING
September 16, 1988
Dear Residents and Property Owners:
This Public Notice is to remind you that the Tukwila City Council will be
holding a public hearing on the zoning for the Riverton Annexation area. On the
back of this notice is the proposed zoning recommended to the City Council by
the Tukwila Planning Commission.
Further information can be obtained at the Planning Department located in
Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard. If you wish to call, the
Planning Department phone number is 433 -1849.
GLV /sjn
(26 /NTC)
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200Southcenter8oulward
Tukwila. Washington 98188
(2061433-1849
;ti it '''
PUBLIC NOTICE
CITY COUNCIL HEARING
September 19, 1988
7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
f
•
V. r'` d
Sincerely y ,--)
ary L. Van Dusen
Mayor
� I\ './ - ..� -- - . _,
,� ii
`` t: a.
,
�i {,, _;i.;1', L------ a
t.:
i
id}: `::1.11::1
t„ ::CC'::t:1':i:'N T' t••1C}1•.�RID .. 4e1 a=1.1i31::a'_
°.(a•,'� }t.11''i DR : c: : }.R 11::1...... ••
1 ... ..i.t t
1::a::iirWAK }- ' 1a!:'0'21f 4..i74`'v
PROPOSED RIVERTON ANNEXATION ZONING
AS AMENDED BY THE TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 2, 1988
IOTE: A LARGER SCALE MAP IS AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT
..........---.....„
S 1! . ri" \ 1 - - ---
il .
1 isi
.....„.........„..,,, ... .a...
41 ... 40. 4* .iirriir•terr•P'4102 14. • '
1 • "
I 0 .
..... 4. 4 . • .* ■ •A°
-,....-4%.
,41■40, '-‘... . - ariast
--- ,
• e*
P '
4 \
.40 4*,,,,, te** • ■ • 4 t ,
-411,..... -.1.- 4 4.•_411141...■ . i .. 11
TP■ 4 °■=. : a > .■ ■ 4 , c
' I . l ' 4 r ■'■ ■
* .4! 4.404** ■■■■41■0 •
a • m
411 4.0.414. .41C -. 40, • •
••• 41144„ .4. %F.. 4.. 41, ,
•- 411 ■41 1 :14...4:p 410',"9.1
_
' now
111111111111•1111 11111111111111111111111•111111
IZIG•111M11111111111111!2rn1111111•11
111111110111131•111111M111111111MWIIK
111111•111•11MIININIM111511111011161
losons-9.
-••-••••4*
• so • • ••
4•
1
• ...r.rd
_ •
• • r.4..•••.
. • mi■•••••■••••■•■••• • `.•
•■•••••■ MRrelli
11.• mom =Ma 2
• . lian4.060=••••■••
fa.sZl.../ ••••••
IN • Nnonn...
•M•tt.e•o.•■•••• I EMITIlbe
aa
IA III
le. ./III.
•■•4=11I I =0.1
' I NM MINIUM"' AM! MB
I
4 ■211=1.4-r =••••■•■••■•
!Ma
.i.i.G..11,-16" _. : .
1 MillaNcromUnr .17e/a '••■•■•Now. p....
Mr 111•a•-■•••■•••■
•• =INC 1•11CAOMI...
IIIIMILI, I
a • Ill•q•••
•■•••/". ••11C.■••■.../1)il .......•,_.••• ,..„ 1./
Y.:3_1En • 111.••• - •
M■MILASEMECO••••••■.".• I I•11
a.......••/•fr.1111=11:..• 845M ••=1
.1 a ill.. I EM 1 MMOVIIIII IT : In
m.o. sVIMIr...•1■11gral•-• - 0•1•AA..M•MM•la
lam •011111•1...1••• ••■• .1.
-
lo.• •14 554 1OM
MISC411-8•_.••.121. I
..r1•111ao•■•. ad
•••••■■•••
f• •.. - WIN. ■.•
5-•142M161.
f11101101..
C =7!
rill- • I CE
a." s•.• •••
MC KV.
.mt. 'V um, asal • . N•ga."
Ip. . .11818i .V•I•Wall•ini
1•••••••~1•••••116 • •••••
wooer air •
• .1....7
•••••• •-
MINIMIEl•Natl•MINNS • WHEN - VW
0./10 Om 4111■1111
..••■•=r•
_ ■•1•
•11116=1•■•••••••■ MINIMUM J■■•••,
1.1MI•0 1•111111a •
10.1N•mma 1•1•14WW11.■.• I
w■••~1V:I••••3•••••••■•••■••"
8.......•..••••■••<•11••■•,4 MLLII•WaorliArlIfl
11•11•Calli•Irli_
ammoline•■• lidMip Ilir.bin•rarra•■••
0
1
• .
...1•••••••■
a r•Pial 1%..
,LAS OP slams
:•
•01.11111.1
1 • 'PP
Gay • UP •
3 • •Vo•
I
i
•wl/•701V Cir37
•
-.-_-
c me my
•
÷t5eT111 VT? row-4LrC
9 22 21
kfk
- 0
‘ 0.••
7 ' 73 .1m_._" 141
c1.1
38:8:
ONO
IMO •
r
R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (7200 S.F.)
R-4 LOW APARTMENTS
RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY
Ei C-1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS
rml C-2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS
C-M INDUSTRIAL PARK
P-0 OFFICE
SI M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY
M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY
.
- •40 A r
r
5
„."
\ N r E'q
N
4
a • . et.
-"Z.. \. N ' '
g • s /
WI .S. i
/ '
' \. •••
a. \ "
e... N../ •
• •
:s • •• ••■.:S N .• . • ....
..1". , -.
S.
v ,
0
•
j. :
. . .. = , ... . . ... .. . ,,,., 0 0 "=. . • .., .. ,-,,.... .. ir .....,--. •-•--- •• .- •
, 04- t;
• - Iiie l '
:4- N ■ - ' • t' \ ;i ' /
\:' ciA CAN %, ''., ,-;
,, t't:i . ..; • 5 •\!..) ' - '
•,. 5' 7
I I"' 1 IL 9
47 1 . ' ".. %..
'",. / ••• •.
t
- • • e
••
• 1-
.Uiki: » „w4.. ,.u.., tea, .,.,. .....�.,......,.........,.... -. ..�__ -_ ..
w ILA 4 City of Tukwila
1908
HEARING DATE: July 28, 1988
FILE NUMBER: 88 -1 -A, 88 -3 -R, 88- 3-CPA, 88 -3 -CA
INITIATED BY: ' Riverton Annexation petitioners
REQUEST: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Amendments
2. Pre - annexation zoning
3. Zoning Code Text Amendments
LOCATION:
ACREAGE: Approximately 223 acres
COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: See Attachments B and C
ZONING DISTRICT: See Attachment D
SEPA
DETERMINATION: Determination of Non - Significance
ATTACHMENTS:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
STAFF REPORT
to the Planning Commission
Prepared July 21, 1988
The general location is east of the current City limits
and Fire District No. 1, north of 139th Street, south of
the Duwamish River, and east of Pacific Highway South (99)
(See Attachment A)
(A) Riverton Annexation Area Boundary
(B) King County Comprehensive Plan Map
(C) Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
(D) King County Zoning
(E) Study Area Map
(F) Sabey- Riverton Community Plan Study -
Summary of Survey Results
(G) Tukwila Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
(H) Proposed Pre - Annexation Zoning Map
(I) Tukwila Proposed Height Exception Area
1
STAFF REPORT to the '"
Planning Commission
BACKGROUND
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
REPORT ORGANIZATION
FINDINGS
In January 1988, the City of Tukwila received a petition signed by residents for
annexation with a request for simultaneous adoption of pre- annexation zoning for
the area shown on Attachment A. The petition contained 77 signatures, 60 of
which were found to be valid signatures of qualified electors within the area
proposed to be annexed. The 1987 General Election had 158 voters for the pro-
posed area, therefore only 16 signatures were needed to qualify the petition.
After the Planning Commission makes their recommendation, the City Council will
hold two public hearings. The public hearings are scheduled for August 15 and
September 19. After the second hearing, the City Council w i l l adopt by ordin-
ance Comprehensive Plan amendments, the zoning and zoning code amendments, to
become effective upon annexation. The annexation is scheduled to go to the
voters on February 7, 1989.
In developing the pre- annexation zoning for the area, there has been extensive
opportunities for residents, property owners and businesses to be involved. On
April 26, 1988, the City held a public informational meeting, which approx-
imately 60 people attended. At that meeting, the staff asked if any of the
people attending wished to serve on a task force to assist the staff in develop-
ing the pre- annexation zoning for the area. A task force of 19 people attended
six meetings in the months of May, June and July. The task force recommendation
in this report reflects a balance between residents' concerns to protect single-
family areas, and business concerns for redevelopment or new development in the
area. The task force recommendations for the most part reflect a consensus of
the group.
For the Planning Commission public hearing, notices were mailed to property
owners and a notice appeared in the local papers. As part of the public notice,
hearing dates for City Council hearings were also mentioned.
The report contains three sections. The first section briefly discusses the
proposed annexation. The second section (blue) addresses the Comprehensive
Land Use Map amendments and proposed zoning districts. The last section (green)
reviews the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Code.
88 -1 -A, 88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
autb .veuti+st. �,a u.:s..a} ut.'u�s...+=+',+rv......w�.. N� �..........,...._.,. _........_
STAFF REPORT to the"`"
Planning Commission
ANNEXATION
88- 1- A,'88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
As shown on Attachment A, the Riverton Annexation request is within the Tukwila
Planning area for annexation. This annexation ties in with the Fire District
No. 1 annexation to the north and east, and the Foster and Thorndyke annexations
to the south.
The Riverton annexation area has a population of approximately 1,224 people.
There are approximately 597 housing units, of which 90% are single - family units.
As part of the environmental review process, the City examined capital and
operation costs to the City. Based upon that information provided by the con-
sultant and additional research by City staff, a supplemental budget will be
adopted by the City Council this fall to address the additional service needs if
the voters approve the annexation.
STAFF REPORT to the ' 88- 1- A; 88 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
Planning Commission
King County
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS
AND PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING
As part of the Riverton annexation petition, pre- annexation zoning was re-
quested. By requesting pre- annexation zoning, the property owners and voters
will know before the election what land use regulations will become effective
upon annexation.
In developing the pre- annexation zoning, the Riverton Task Force and City
staff reviewed a variety of planning documents. Attachment F is a summary of
community response to a King County community meeting in Riverton to determine
community concerns for a King County Community Plan revision.
Task Force members were briefed on Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and
zoning regulations. This material was then compared to King County's Community
Plan and land use regulations to identify conflicts and potential land use
issues. Tukwila zones do not exactly duplicate King County's. For example, the
County's RM -900 Maximum Density Muntiple- Dwelling Zone allows office uses in the
zone, while Tukwila's RMH Multi- Residence High Density zone does not allow any
office uses. The following table provides the most comparable zones with refer-
ence to uses.
SR -1500, RS -7200 Single Family
Residential (2.8, 6 dwelling units
per acre, respectively)
RM -1800 High Density Multiple Dwelling
(24 dwelling units per acre)
RM -900 Maximum Density Multiple Dwelling
(48.4 dwelling units per acre)
B -N Neighborhood Business
C -G General Commercial
M -P Manufacturing Park
M -L Light Manufacturing
M -H Heavy Manufacturing
COMPARABLE ZONING CATEGORIES
Tukwila
After reviewing the comparable zoning, the zoning was overlaid with Tukwila's
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Several conflicts between the zoning and the
City's Comprehensive Plan were identified. Attachment. E depicts those areas
where revisions in either the City's Comprehensive Plan or zoning were examined.
Each of these areas identified are discussed in greater detail in the following
pages.
4
R -1 -12.0
R -1 -7.2 Single - Family Residential
(3.6/6 dwelling units per acre)
R -4 Low Apartments
(21.8 dwelling units per acre)
RMH Multi - Residence High Density
(29 dwelling units per acre)
C -1 Community Retail Business
C -2 Regional Retail Business
C -M Industrial Park
M -1 Light Industrial
M -2 Heavy Industrial
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 1
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Heavy Industry
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Light Industrial
KING COUNTY ZONING
MH - Heavy Industry
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
M -2 - Heavy Industry
This area's use currently consists of METRO bus parking and storage and
vacant lots. A portion of the properties are split between Fire District
No. 1 annexation and the Riverton annexation. The City has zoned the
portion in Fire District No. 1 as M -2 - Heavy Industrial.
The Task Force and staff have concluded that the M -2 - Heavy Industry zoning
is consistent with the existing use of this area, as well as earlier City
decision for the abutting property in Fire District No. 1.
Amend the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map from Light Industrial to
Heavy Industrial and zone the area M -2 - Heavy Industry.
Planning staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
(26 /RA.AREA1) (LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
(26 /RA.AREA2)
Zy
'" ta AREA 4
This area begins the visual transition between the industrial uses of METRO
and Boeing facilities to the north and single - family neighborhoods to the
east and south. Tukwila's Comprehensive Land use Plan designates this area
Light Industrial, which conflicts with what would be comparable zoning of
R -1 - Single - Family Residential by Tukwila.
The Task Force has had lengthy discussions concerning this area resulting in
the agreement that 126th Street is an appropriate transition point between
industrial and residential uses. C -M district designation would provide
tighter restrictions on development which would be more compatible with the
adjacent residential uses. However, the task force still believes addi-
tional standards are needed to provide a better transition from residential
to industrial. A C -M text amendment is proposed in conjunction with the C -M
zoning designation for this area. See text amendment section.
Retain the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation - Light Indus-
trial - and zone the area C -M - Industrial Park with the text amendments
proposed in Section #3.
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
6
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 2
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Single - Family Residential
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Light Industrial
KING COUNTY ZONING
RS - Residential Single - Family
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
R -1 - Single - Family Residential
(LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the Task Force recommendation.
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 3
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Highway- oriented commercial/
Single Family
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Commercial
KING COUNTY ZONING
C -G - Commercial
R -S - Single - Family Residential
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
C -2 - Regional Retail Business
R -1 - Single - Family Residential
The Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map designates this entire area for
commercial use. King County Comprehensive Plan splits the upper section
as commercial and the lower as residential. The site is divided into two
sections by a steep (100 %) slope at a height from 75 -100 feet. The uphill
portion of the site abuts 99 and the lower section - vacant at present -
fronts a residential neighborhood.
Zoning decisions for this area were based on two key elements - topography
and orientation. The part of the site which is oriented to SR -99 and
separated physically by topography from the residential use area is desig-
nated commercial. The part of the site with orientation and physically
connected to the residential neighborhood should be designated single- family
residential.
The Task Force recommends that the upper section of the site remain
commercial, but the lower section be amended and designated residential on
Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. Based upon the Comprehensive
Plan Map, the zoning would be C -2 and R -1.
(26 /RA.AREA3) (LR 07/20/88)
7
AREA 4;
noyntj ;' i4G1 gilllt»>�
AREA 6
r i
AREA 7
i h N
. • i w
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this entire area as
commercial. The King County Comprehensive Plan designations range from
light manufacturing to commercial and residential. The existing uses
include an auto repair business, moving and storage business, second -hand
and small grocery stores and a barbershop along East Marginal Way. The
surrounding residential area consists of older, well -kept, owner - occupied
homes.
The current Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan does not reflect existing
uses nor change in topography. The task force would like to encourage
redevelopment of the commercial area, while also providing a better
transition from single - family to commercial use.
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
The task force is recommending the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Map be
amended to reduce the commercial area and designate an area on the west
side of East Marginal Way as Light Industrial. The proposed Comprehensive
Plan designation and zoning are shown on Attachments G and H. In
conjunction with this recommendation, the task force is recommending text
amendments to the zoning code to provide better buffers (see text amendment
section of this report).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
(26 /RA.AREA3 -7)
- 8 -
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 4,5,6/7
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Industrial
Single - Family Residential
Neighborhood /Community Business
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Commercial
KING COUNTY ZONING
M -L - Light Manufacturing
B -N - Neighborhood Business
C -G - Commercial General
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
M -1 - Light Manufacturing
C -1 - Neighborhood Commercial
C -2 - General Commercial
(LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this site as commercial,
while King County has designated it for residential use. The property is
approximately 6,000 square feet in size. The site is predominantly vacant
except for a METRO bus stop. The site is oriented toward SR -99 and then
drops to the north and east. As shown on the map, the site is surrounded on
three sides by road rights -of -way. This site is surrounded on three sides
by roads and as a result is noisy and unattractive. The current single use
is for a METRO bus stop with the remainder of the lot vacant and overgrown
with weeds. Its primary orientation is to Highway 99.
Based on the facts that this site is oriented to Highway 99 and is
surrounded by roads on three sides, this site should be viewed as commercial
rather than residential property.
The Task Force recommended retaining the Tukwila Comprehensive Land use Plan
designation of commercial. The zoning will be C -2 to allow for a variety of
commercial uses.
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 8
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Residential
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Commercial
KING COUNTY ZONING
RS - Single - Family Residential
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
R -1 - Single - Family Residential
(26 /RA.AREA8) 9 (LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
(26 /RA.AREA9)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 9
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
High /Maximum Density Multi -
Family Housing
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Low - Density Residential
KING COUNTY ZONING
RM -1800 - High /Maximum Density
Multi- Family Housing
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
RMH - Multiple- Residence
High Density
The site encompasses approximately two acres. The existing use is a
single - family residence. The topography of this site is oriented to the
residential neighborhood. Highway 99 is at a much higher grade and as a
result, is physically and visually separate from the lower residential
development.
Both the Task Force and the staff agree that due to the orientation of the
buildable portion of the site and its topography, Low - Density Residential is
the appropriate designation.
The Task Force recommended retaining the residential designation as stated
in the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The zoning under this
designation will be R -1 - Single - Family Residence.
10 - • (LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
(26 /RA.AREA10) - 11 -
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 10
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
High /Maximum Density
Multi - Family Housing
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Low Density Residential
KING COUNTY ZONING
RM900 - Maximum Density
Multi- Family Dwelling
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
RMH - Multiple- Residence
High Density
Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area for low- density
residential. The King County Comprehensive Plan designates it as High/
Maximum Density Multi- Family Housing. Topography changes at the edge of
SR -99 determine its orientation to the surrounding residential development
as opposed to the commercial uses on SR -99. The property is currently
vacant but there has been a proposal to build a nursing home which is still
in the County review process. The proposal has been required to provide an
Environmental Impact Statement.
Based on earlier discussions regarding topography and existing uses, it was
determined that they were again key decisive elements. Highway 99 is
located approximately 100 feet above the buildable site with access through
the residential area. As a result, City staff and the Task Force concluded
that single- family residential would be the most appropriate use.
The Task Force recommends that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan
designation for Low - Density Residential be maintained. The zoning will be
R -1 - Single - Family Residential.
(LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 11
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
High /Maximum Density
Multi- family Housing
Highway- oriented commercial
Parks and Open Space
High Density Residential
Medium - Density Residential
Parks and Open Space
KING COUNTY ZONING
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
C -G - General Commercial
RS7200 - Single - Family Residential
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
C -2 - Regional Retail Business
R -1 - Single- Family Residential
There are several conflicts between Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and King
County's Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the zoning in some cases
conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan designations. The South Central
School District owns approximately 3.6 acres, of which approximately 1 acre
is designated commercial and the remaining is designated open space in the
County. The portion that abuts Highway 99 has a topography consisting of
steep slopes down from the highway.
As discussed in other areas, those properties abutting Highway 99 which are
at a lower level than the highway should be designated for less intensive
uses.
The task force recommends that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
be amended and designated single - family residential. The zoning district
would then be R -1 (Single - Family Residential).
(26 /RA.AREA11) (LR 07/20/88)
- 12 -
J II
JL
iteb.
33RD =�
f, ',MSS
O uI
r >�
PP
.(.ut Art)
A
7;-
AREA 12
. 1
R' RIk-aiN„
AREA 13
/37TH SST
• 1C Ls
u
LI
al - <.
l
CIIM l \V \C111 II .I ' �,rY
11l 1iuF�Q a ° "r r �l k 2 (��1
F1 �
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 12
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Single - Family Residential
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Light Industrial
KING COUNTY ZONING
RS - Residential Single - Family
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
R -1 - Single - Family Residential
Tukwila's Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates this area as light industry
and King County's Comprehensive Plan designates it residential. The
existing use includes nine single - family dwelling units and is surrounded by
single - family dwelling units in all directions, except the northwest.
Designating this area single - family residential is consistent with the
existing use and would prevent a "pocket" formation of uses. This decision
would predetermine use to the south of this site, but it is not anticipated
as inconsistent with present and future development.
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
The Task Force felt that designating this area as residential would be the
best use based on current use patterns and topography. The Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Plan will be changed from light industrial to
single - family residential. The zoning will be R -1 (Single - Family
Residential).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
- 13 -
(26 /RA.AREAl2) (LR 07/20/88)
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION
RIVERTON ANNEXATION - AREA 13
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Light Manufacturing
TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
Light Industrial
KING COUNTY ZONING
RS - Residential Single - Family
COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING
R -1 - Single- Family Residential
The site abuts the freeway interchange and the Interurban right -of -way to
the northeast. The area to the northwest is zoned and in current use as
light industrial. To the southeast, the area is zoned M -1 with existing
light industrial use as well as a building used as a residence.
Due to the small size of the site, its proximity to the freeway, and
abutting high industrial uses, this site should be designated and zoned for
light industrial.
The Task Force concluded that the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan
designation of light industrial should be maintained. The zoning should be
M -1 - Light Industry.
Staff concurs with Task Force recommendations.
(26 /RA.AREA13) - 14 -
(LR 07/20/88)
STAFF REPORT to the
Planning Commission
Currently in the single- family residential areas, County zoning for minimum lot
size varies from 15,000 square feet to 7,200 square feet. The Task Force is
recommending that the minimum lot size for single - family areas be 7,200 square
feet. They felt by recommending this lot size that they would encourage new
single - family development in those existing established single - family neighbor-
hoods. The new development would further establish this area for single - family
development and encourage improvements to the existing houses.
CONCLUSIONS
In staff meetings with the people in this annexation area, common concerns have
been. expressed. The concerns are:
- Preserve and enhance the existing single- family areas.
- Provide a better transition between residential uses and nonresidential
uses.
- Provide opportunity for redevelopment and new development of existing
commercial areas.
- Provide opportunity for expansion of industrial uses.
RECOMMENDATIONS
88 -1 -A, -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
The work that has been done in this annexation area should be viewed as a
Comprehensive Plan update. By working with residents, property owners, and
business people, the staff has tried to identify the land use issues and work
with the various affected parties to develop a consensus on a solution to
the issues. The land use plan proposed does not always up -zone or down -zone
properties. The proposal in this report tries to balance a wide variety of
concerns. Due to the short time schedule, every issue could not be resolved
prior to annexation. After annexation, further refinement in the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan and Zoning Code will be needed.
Planning staff recommends approval of Attachment G - Tukwila Amended Comprehen-
sive Land Use Plan Map, and Attachment H - Proposed Pre - Annexation Zoning Map.
STAFF REPORT to the
Planning Commission
This section will review the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Code in
conjunction with the pre- annexation zoning discussed in the preceding section.
The proposed amendments would be approved through an ordinance that would become
effective upo exation of the area to Tukwila. The proposed amendments are
grouped under a categories: Buffering, Height Exception, M -1 - Light Indus-
trial Use and n Review. Proposed additions are shown in bold print and
deletions are in [ ]
ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS
88 -1 -A, 88; R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
BUFFERING
Section 18.52.020 C -M Industrial Park - Setback Standards
EXISTING: Front yard - 50 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - 5 feet.
PROPOSED: Minimum setback of 50 feet when adjacent
to a residential use.
Section 18.52.030(4) C -M Industrial Park - Required Landscape Area
EXISTING: Front yard - 15 feet; side yard - 5 feet; rear yard - none.
PROPOSED: Fifteen feet of landscaping shall be provided when development
in the C -M zone abuts residential uses.
Section 18.60.030(2)(B) Design Review Requirements for the C -M Zone
EXISTING: Design Review is required if the proposed structure exceeds
10,000 square feet.
PROPOSED: When C -M development is adjacent to residential uses,
Design Review is required.
Discussion
These three amendments are intended to provide a better transition between
residential uses and industrial uses. Currently in the City, the C -M Industrial
Park zone does not abut any residential areas. The proposed standard would not
affect existing uses in Tukwila, but would affect the new development north of
126th in the Riverton area. The proposed standard improves the existing stan-
dards for buffering, while at the same time providing the opportunity for
greater standards if needed through the Design Review process.
STAFF REPORT to the L.. 88- 1- A, \..d -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
Planning Commission
HEIGHT EXCEPTION
Section 18.50.020 M -1 Light Industrial
EXISTING: Maximum Building Height - Four stories /45 feet
PROPOSED: See Attachment I for areas to be added to the
Height Exception Up to and Including 115 Feet.
Section 18.50.040 Building Height Exceptions Up to and Including 115 Feet
Authorization of building height greater than the heights contained in
Section 18.50.020 (Table 1) up to and including 115 feet in the areas
of the City as designated on Map shall be made by the Planning Com-
mission acting as the Board of Architectural Review pursuant to the
guidelines and procedures specified in Chapter 18.60.
Any application for a proposed structure exceeding 100 feet in overall
height and located north of Interstate 405 shall be submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration for an advisory report. The report of
the FAA shall be submitted to the BAR as part of the Staff Report.
Discussion
The proposed height exception is similar to the text amendment made in Fire
District No. 1. The height exception would extend to the area north of 125th
Avenue which has a proposed zoning designation of M -1.
M -1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USES
EXISTING: Section 18.40.020(8) Principally Permitted Uses
Manufacturing, processing and /or assembling previously prepared metals
or plastics including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing
or punching of metal [not exceeding 1/8 inch in thickness], engraving,
galvanizing, and handforging.
PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.40.070 Performance Standards
Use, activity, or operations within a structure shall not emit odor,
noise, dust, smoke, gas or vibration which are discernible to a person
at normal sensitivities at the edge of the property.
Discussion
The proposed amendment would affect all areas in the City zoned M -1. Over the
last year, several businesses have commented on the limitations of metal thick-
ness. Due to changing technology, most cities and counties no longer regulate
light industrial uses by metal thickness. The 1/8 -inch thickness is being
removed and a Performance Standard is being added to ensure the impacts of light
industrial use will end at the edge of the property.
- 17 -
STAFF REPORT to the.
Planning Commission
DESIGN REVIEW
PROPOSED NEW: Section 18.60.030(2)(H) Scope of Authority
All proposed developments along East Marginal Way between 125th Street
and 131st Street in all zone districts, excluding single- family homes.
Discussion
This amendment would only affect non - single family uses along East Marginal Way
in the Riverton annexation area. As mentioned earlier, the task force would
like to encourage redevelopment of their commercial area and assurance of better
transition between single family uses and non - residential uses. The design
review process provides for the opportunity for residents to be informed of what
is proposed and comment.
Planning staff recommends that the text amendments discussed above be adopted as
part of the Riverton pre- annexation zone proposal.
(22/88 -1 -A)
RECOMMENDATIONS
88- 1- A, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA
rj rot
ST
IMEIIN;111 111 :1IIIIIIIIIIII111I111111IIIII; ' #
!/. I. 1. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�;I I \
IIVII IIIIIII ;IIIIIIIIIIIIIICI�IIIIIII it ' i
3f, IIIIII 11!IIIIIC �;
i���IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII \ 'k
RIVERTON
ANNEXATION AREAS
FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
SEA -TAC INCORPORATION
RIVERTON ANNEXATION
El FOSTER ANNEXATION
THORNDYKE ANNEXATION
TUKWILA CITY LIMITS
TUKWILA PLANNING AREA
MOMS
•, GM
110
> r 111111 ,11111 lllllllla14
IIIIIII!IIIIIII di_�,0111 ' 1111 \(
A � 1
f0 IM �
1 inie• Bea ^•
� t
613•• �L rr ' 1 1
+`
AM
1111111
ATTACHMENT A
c
L k - 27.;
•
ATLAS 0Ificrrui
* .•
1
j
•
TO CREST .
i!i fe.:1-45
. 4 : - V.:1
Si
• 4- t
KING COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
- LEGEND
ENEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY BUSINESS
E HIGHWAY ORIENTED COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRY
MANUFACTURING
HIGH/MAXIMUM DENSITY HOUSING
rs2 LOW/MEDIUM DENSITY HOUSING
SINGLE FAMILY
PARK AND RECREATION
AIRPORT FACILITY
• : - .
i
...• t• ■••
N •
, s( , ;`) , 7
•ltr••
zla c ' 11?- ' 1
L, I 14
4n
e
E W A
F' r? A r
/->
/
/
.. - .* NopT
.
..71-. .:
..„, c„.... .
..„,.
. ,.,. .) / ‘'N :.
- '1N. ''--,N, i,-.... 4.. •-• ' . ' -.;'
. ..-1`;--!. I r '-f . ' ' ' , f • ot /
1 i/ e ■ 1 ',... - . • .-
,-fr_..- L=,1.,_e_e .-. • -' , ',.fc.;-----r ---- -
.- ,
.. —"--- -. % • '...'.- • .. : • .,...,.: :"...,,:. ,..: ...... ....
'
ll . , e .+•• •---"--.. ' '-
, .. .
, ; ''',.- , ' •v "i: / ,,,'
f. - 'Yds • susb-
4:::
"7" LO'r ;)•.; " 4; , ..e; 4 .
..'-,0 T. .
. ' ..i.!
•
• 'f
; • 1,
• i •• •
'•■ , A ;I" I
• 4
• 1, I I
0,00
ATTACHMENT B
\
I
•
>5
oa •
4.44.$4.
3AV MIOV
_2.
3m- mar
1111• 41.44111
111
.
41, 7,4 519 F-51°
WV. iv
S JA ciNe.
INA!.
ONIF
0 UWAMISH
0
CS
III
RiirER
RE
•
■-•
• •
•
4.4
S i
-3Av
" r74 . 7 .
• f o
a- i •••
7 • •
...0... a. \ \• 1 ° •rr..
;5.14,
-
Stou.ny ,y
!I
.._
•
4,:;411:`
.. e sb . r 0,. 1-5 • C 56 .,/') ,...
\ '1. VO...:4.5“:1 •• •: - .!......M .* ' - '=" , "".5 5- - ..; ,,-•"4... iil
• s
. - -
..... .
. ;.!
• •
— 1
.71.1.3t
TwvavE,cgt.9 a;c2
•
-
a 1:M f `?..
aawr
9994 991c.
• •
- • • tfit:
y ,u4:
1
•V
p CIFiC Ow,
ar
4
a .
2
4.4
4 ,1•631vrt
Al VCR
AT1AS Olt SIATTLIT
DUWAMISH • :
,/Vego
p
424;1:
riFf4 s Pc 41
wrm •
- 11
RIVERTON CREST
A...! " rrrrtl . • !,• .33
I I I
. .i'l
1
.,..
I .
e f-7. 0
try.
iE.ETER1'
• Url
i4ii-D L-
! ‘[_ •:1. '"
..1 .
.419.
•• ••1,1 1° 43 1.
•"•
. -
"•
-5
•
ATTLE
• •• A °
• • .40TA• 4 4 6.0
KING COUNTY ZONING
LEGEND
M-H HEAVY MANUFACTURING
M-P LIGHT INDUSTRY
C-G GENERAL COMMERCIAL
M-L NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS
S-R SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL
RM 900 MEDIUM DENSITY
MULTIPLE DWELLING RESIDENTIAL
\L;re‘74. r
C
: );( Nr ER /,
N,•> -
NOYIT H ^
0.1
.
e•J
c ' ,
•
4:•
•I: /,
•.■ ■• sT
ATTACHMENT D t ifi
'
••■■... •
I •
Du w A mISH
an -
to
4
4
JAY wj
or
.....
, ts7
"
Ejft
King County
Planning and Community
Development Division
Parks, Planning and
Resources Department
707 Smith lower Building
506 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98104
(208) 344 -7810
May 2, 1988
RE: Community Plan Revision Studies, Riverton Area, and Northeast Hiqhline
Community Plan
Dear Northeast Highline Community Residents:
The King County Council requested that the Parks, Planning and Resources
Department initiate two plan revision studies (Sabey- Riverton and Whitlow)
for properties within and adjacent to the Highline community planning
area. In March 1988, Community Planning staff held a community meeting
in Riverton to determine whether or not to recommend pursuing a plan revision
and if so, what the scope of the plan revision should be. A summary of
community response to these issues is enclosed.
In April 1988, the Council considered a third plan revision study (DeRuyter)
in the Riverton area. After reviewing the issues raised by these three
plan revisions, the King County Council directed that all three be folded
into the upcoming Northeast Highline Community Plan update. The Riverton,
Allentown, and Skyway areas are all included in the update, which is scheduled
to start this fall. A map of the Northeast Highline Community Plan boundaries
is enclosed.
The Northeast Highline Community Plan will incorporate a broad range of
issues and community concerns. Important elements of the plan will include
economic development, water and sewer service, transportation, housing,
parks and recreation, and cultural resources.
Community Planning staff will work with local residents and business people,
representatives from the City of Tukwila, and others to develop the Northeast
Highline Community Plan. I will send you more information about the plan
update process as work begins this fail.
If you have any questions please call Anne Knapp, Community Planner, at
344 -4266.
Sincerely,
Craig sen
Chief
CL:AK:mg
CPO46 /H /3
Enclosure
cc: Ron Sims, King County Councilmember
Lois Schwennesen, Manager, Planning and Community Development Division
ATTN: Anne Knapp, Community Planner
ATTACHMENT F
April 1, 1988
SABEY - RIVERTON COMMUNITY PLAN REVISION STUDY
SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS
$abey- Riverton Plan Revision Study
The King County Council has requested that the Parks, Planning
and Resources Department initiate a community plan revision study
in the Highline Community Plan area for properties located in
Riverton. Community Planning staff asked local residents to help
them decide what area to study and what, if any, land use changes
should be considered.
Community Recommendations and Responses
A. Questionnaire
A questionnaire, mailed to local residents and distributed
at a community workshop, was part of the information
gathering process. Fifty -three residents completed the
questionnaire; their responses are summarized below.
1. What description beet fits the Riverton community?
�$ A. A stable, single - family neighborhood.
B. An area in transition from single - family homes
to other uses.
12 C. Other (please describe).
Riverton is also described as a blighted
residential area changing_ to industrial and
commercial uses.
2. What would you like the community to be in the future?
2� A. A stable, single - family neighborhood.
1$ B. A manufacturing, commercial, and office area.
$ C. A combination of A and B.
D. Other (please describe).
Responses indicate mixed preferences for
residential. commercial. or industrial.
3. What are the most severe problems facing the Riverton
community? Please rank the problems from 1 to 5, with
1 being most severe.
1 2 3 4 5
I. EL $. 6. Q A. Truck traffic.
. Li a 1. B. Traffic congestion.
Z..Zf 6. 6. Q a C. Changing single - family
homes to other uses.
a 4. a a a D. Few opportunities for economic
development.
is Z a a a E. Other (please describe).
The most severe "Other" problems are poor communication
betpeen _the County _and residents. drug problems. lack
of industrial devcloPment oppertunities. dif.fiut i tv
obtaining home loans. and Metro Base noise and air
pollution. Less severe problems include depressed
residential property values, traffic, a deteriorating
neighborhood, unattractive land uses, encroachment of
industrial and commercial ventures, need for urban
services, zoning problems, and prostitution.
4. How can the County help Riverton resolve these problems?
The community has reached no concensus on possible
golutions. Recommendations include rezoning the area
to manufacturing or commercial, maintaining the
existing residential zoning, postponing the study until
the issue of annexation to the City of Tukwila is
settled, a quick plan amendment study, enforcement of
trucking laws, and better police protection.
Boundaries of the Sabey Riverton Plan Revision Study
Community residents requested a wide range of
boundary alternatives for a plan revision study.
Options varied from a small two block area to an
extensive area bounded by State Route 599 to the north
and east, Highway 99 to the west, and S. 144th Street
to the south.
B. Addition 1 Community Response
Community Planning also received letters, phone calls, and
petitions from residents and developers about the proposed
study. Developers support rezones to permit manufacturing
uses. The majority of residents are opposed to an amendment
that would change the current land use and zoning. The
community is quite divided on the issue of changing land use
and very sensitive to all County actions in the area.
1. Riverton Annexation Proposal Group
In January a group of local residents submitted
petitions to Tukwila requesting an election to annex.
The croup of over 30 residents requests that the County
postpone the study until after the outcome of the
glection.
2. Petition From Riverton Community Residents
These 98 residents _do not favor any amendment to the
.• __ • _,
Community Plan that would chaff the present sinale-
family land use designation.
3. City of Tukwila
Gary VanAllagen. Mavor._reauegted that the County
postpone the plan revision jtudv until after Riverton
residents vote on annexation, tentatively scheduled for
the February 7, 1989 ballot. The City is already
conducting a pre- annexation zoning study of the area
under consideration.
4. Additional phone calls, individual letters, and visits
from Riverton residents and interested developers over
the past several weeks indicate that the community is
still very divided over the extent of a plan revision
study and the desired outcomes of any such study. In
addition, residents are very concerned that they have
an opportunity to fully participate in any future
County decisions in their neighborhood including
rezones, plan revision studies, and plan updates.
NORTHEAST HIGHLINE PLAN
Riverton • Allentown • Skyway
R/V£R
1.17111777•••••71111 • •.•..\. • WOO nrs•-.��i. ..r.wr- •.r•�et� r
MA
II IM
••.T. 1.177.7.•• -..• RN rrNN
• � Q .M0. Q1'rrr
loos am,.
�i . • _ �. � s-
imams . • s•. ti..• > VOIM• l.••...rt••r.
.a 11.7.111V a•wbaas.wwwwwt. ww w•
••�ri rrr
• Was.,... 1.4.1.11•101.11•711.11 1 JI •• VN /.Mal
.. IN
l.111•1i . r.....w. •:7M • •er111 r
ar..,n11 n I i . ere dr - 4..r .N �•
w•.M•.�. r... -73• � n a -
•�_ ^\.. •S •
, �•n..r l ar.u.•.ar rr•■:
- pNM%is = i. ' •� ai
— — a'•.1.. ..
11•1• Mal
6.7 N�J
M
" •11
7• •„�•till.i � � �e• �
...error
rvr .
aur,rr •111.11: WW1
•
ct
I g7
'
A
;•..• u , 7
ATLAS Cl AAAT7LA
• v.7- ..• T• Ar
1
•
lid ,RAM
OUWAMISH
R /VFR --
Te o' •n
LEGEND
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
El COMMERCIAL
Q LIGHT INDUSTRY
HEAVY INDUSTRY
IIIQI(I
'r..•. n.. •I•a
�C� O 5\ r W u r te \r
( r E a
3
'I
TUKWILA AMENDED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP
ATTACHMENT G
RIVER
.. lommemommomma
ffiTIMUSUMMEMUMUMMESURUIR
USIUMMMOSIMMMUMMMWEIIMMEMER
INMERMINIMMUMOMMEMISIMMOMM
IMEMIIIMOIMMEMEMEMMIUMUMME
IMUMEMOIMMENNOMMUMMOMMEMMS
IMMEWNWINIMMINIMUNIIMOMMMIEON
SUMUUMUMMUMMOUUMMUSUM
10.1114111
MUM
AM%
MOON
1111•117
JUNIN
MUNI
NMI
NMI
WWI
=KM'. -
untommim
11111111111MSB
UMUMMOR
1111111MEMO
I••IRI•OIS
••EMMO
WEIM2
41 4 k
11
4/ .4• • . 4"A".
41 411i 41 4?
litk W 'NOV
• tI fl 4
R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
R-4 LOW APARTMENTS
RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY
C-1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS
C-2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS
C-M INDUSTRIAL PARK
><><5 M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRY
1:1:1111 M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY
JIN
1 1/2 . — • -
PROPOSED PRE-ANNEXATION ZONING MAP
r.
Q
0
� e ,
wY• . C,evY
.I�
li
/•
.
•
I r - - -.
(3
• e Ei
•
Z
U
t I t
o uwA M l5"
Marrth,sle !l
Nis r
mr
M H
5.- 7AY - - -M e
S jAr. . LY E �S.
4 W
Q
0
d
W
X
W
F
CD
W
W
N
0
a
0
a
J
H
July 12, 1988
RIVERTON ANNEXATION REQUEST TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA
Dear Resident:
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
(206) 433-1800
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
PUBLIC NOTICE
In January, 1988, the City of Tukwila received a petition from residents in •
your area requesting annexation to Tukwila. Over the last several months,
City staff have been working with residents and businesses in developing the
zoning for this area upon annexation. On the back of this notice is the pro-
posed zoning. The City will be holding the following public hearings on the
zoning and annexation request.
After the public hearings; an election date will be set for the residents to
vote on the annexation request.
Further information can be obtained at the Planning Department located in
Tukwila City.Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. If you wish to call, the Planning
Department phone number is 433 -1849.
GLV/co
P /JP.7 -12
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING ON ZONING ONLY
July 28, 1988
8:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
CITY COUNCIL HEARINGS ON ZONING /ANNEXATION REQUEST
August 15, 1988 /September 19, 1988
7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers
Tukwila City Hall
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
TukwIa. Wa ington 98188
(ION 433.11149
i■cs.Viiii .............■
■iii:lt.t■ ■............
UMWOMMUMENNENNEREOMNOMMIL
■..■[I......I.aa.........■
IONNEMINNEENNOMMINEMENNEEML
INIUM■■.■■■■■ ■f■■.■■■..■.
I...r• .................r.■
IM ...............M...M
_ ra—
,U I I
L..1 u•
WNW
EWES
IMAMS
JONES
INOME1
INIEN VI
J.■ ■I
UNSEEN
•M..I
mum
memos
— :SCL_
t.II7■ ■ ■I
■..r..■
1..M.■■
INEMM■.
1■ ■N■..
■ ■MONS
. _
R -1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
R -4 LOW APARTMENTS
RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSIT
C -1 COMMUNITY RETAIL BUSINESS
C -2 REGIONAL RETAIL BUSINESS
C -M INDUSTRIAL PARK
M -1 LIGHT INDUSTRY
M -2 HEAVY INDUSTRY
_
ATLAS O/ U*ITL!
- 'I
1
InISZ — APR.
•
Sr
RIVERTON
PROPOSED TUKWILA ZONING
Air EW A
C o RP E RA
N T E A R
RIVERTON
NORTH
•
RS SUED; ? •
LOS �T
B • 6 4. •
ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
rk lr Js1
LARGER SCALE MAP AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW IN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I
p
/Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
Case Number:
Applicant:
Request:
Location:
(21/NTC.7 -28)
City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
City of Tukwila
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board
of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on July 28, 1988, at
8:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter
Boulevard, to consider the following:
Planning Commission Public Hearing
87 -3 -R, 88 -3 -CPA, 88 -3 -CA: RIVERTON ANNEXATION
Riverton Annexation Petitioners
1. Pre - annexation zoning for the Riverton area
2. Amending Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map
3. Amending the Tukwila Zoning Code
The general location is east of the current City limits and
Fire District No. 1, north of 139th Street, south of the
Duwamish River, and east of Pacific Highway South (99)
Board of Architectural Review Public Hearing
88 -6 -DR: DEVANEY TENANT IMPROVEMENT
Mr. and Mrs. J. DeVaney
Renovation of an existing 2,304 square foot, 1 -story building
14805 Interurban Avenue South, Tukwila, WA, in
NE * of. Sec 23, Twn 23, Rge 4.
Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement
or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be
obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify
your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above
items.
Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday July 17, 1988
Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants,
Adjacent Property Owners, File.
w "A City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433 -1849
PURPOSE OF MEETING
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
FUTURE MEETINGS
FURTHER INFORMATION
(26/NTC.4 -26)
RIVERTON ANNEXATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING
The City of Tukwila received a petition for annexation by election for the
Riverton area, where you live and /or own property. You are invited to attend an
informational meeting on the proposed annexation. The reverse side of this
notice shows a map of that area.
Foster High School
Cafeteria
4242 South 144th Street
Representatives from the City of Tukwila will be there to:
• Explain how the annexation process works.
• Review the time'frame for election.
• Provide handouts explaining common questions about annexation.
• Listen and answer questions you have regarding the annexation request.
Towards the end of the meeting, City staff will be asking residences and
property owners if they would be willing to serve on a citizens task force with
Planning staff in developing a land use plan and zoning for the area.
This summer, the Tukwila Planning Commission and City Council will be holding
public meetings to review the proposed land use plan, zoning and annexation
request.
Contact Jack Pace, Senior Planner, or Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner,
at 433 -1849. All correspondence can be mailed to them at the Tukwila Planning
Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188.
- RIVERTON
ANNEXATION
4 4.41 " City of Tukwila
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
(206) 433-1849
BOUNDARY MAP
APPL A ON
DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS
APPLICANT
L
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
1/20/88
88 -1 -CA
FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
AMENDMENT
CITY -WIDE
CITY OF TUKWILA
EPIC -3 -87
2/3/88
88 -2 -CA
ADULT ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE
M -2 ZONE
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
EPIC -2 -88
7/13/88
88 -3 -CA
RIVERTON ANNEXATION
C -M, M -1 DISTRICTS
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
EPIC -20 -88
7/26/88
88 -4 -CA
HAZARDOUS WASTE ZONING
ZONING CODE
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
EPIC -21 -88
7/26/88
88 -5 -CA
HEIGHT EXCEPTION
THORNDYKE ANNEXATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
12/1/88
88 -6 -CA
INTO COMM /IND. - EXPAND RUTH.
FOR DESIGN REVIEW
TUKWILA ZONING CODE - CITY -WIDE
CITY OF TUKW;.LA
EPIC -32 -88
rot ritt WrIt k POW
Maikkrk M
se6 ALSO Box J
312.
CODE AMENDMENT 1988
eo4*-4-
w\Klit.)01
• . . . . .
•
FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT
IA BB - CA
1M ~- a • -CA
.
sin &WWNI
eA: - •TRANDYt
DATE
OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT
DATE
bAs
OUT TO
FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT
NB.22E -Oa HASTINGS, MN. — LOS ANGELES — LOGAN, OH. -- McGREGOR, TX. — LOCUST GROVE, GA. U.S.A
DATE
FILE NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
ADDRESS
'
APPLICANT
FILE
CROSS REFERENCE
ACTION
1/22/88
88 -1 -CPA
FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
• ANNEXATION
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -1 -CPA
4/4/88
88 -2 -CPA
SCHNEIDER ANNEXATION
S. OF 178TH & E. OF 1 -5
GERALD E. SCHNEIDER
EPIC -12 -88
88 -2 -A
88 -3 -CPA
RIVERTON ANNEXATION
, ANNEXATION AREA
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -1 -A A8
7/19/88
88 -4 -CPA
THORNDYKE ANNEXATION
144TH ON NORTH, 99 ON WEST 160TH ON
SOUTH, CITY LIMITS ON EAST
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -4 -A
EPIC -14 -88
10/17/88
88 -5 -CPA
FOSTER ANNEXATION
ANNEXATION AREA
CITY OF TUKWILA
88 -3 -A
•
COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 1988
irx# t-4(0