Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 87-01-A - CITY OF TUKWILA - FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATIONmf 87-1-a epic-3-87 mf 88-1-r CITY OF TUKWILA - FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /6 /S AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING- TON. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1503 TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, it has come to the attention of the City Council that Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 1503, passed February 21. 1989, contained an incorrect legal descrip- tion, and WHEREAS. it is necessary to correct such legal description to complete the annexation of the full area approved by the Boundary Review Board and approved by vote of the residents, and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the public peace and safety that the correct boundaries be established within the jurisdiction of the City as soon as possible: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment. Ordinance No. 1503 of the City of Tukwila, Washing- ton, is hereby amended by replacing Exhibit A to said Ordinance with Exhibit A to this Ordinance which by this reference is incorporated herein in full. Section 2. Ratification. In all other respects, Ordinance No. 1503 shall remain in full force and effect and is ratified hereby. Section 3. Effective Date - Declaration of Emergency. A public emergency is hereby dedared for the protection of the public safety and peace and this Ordinance shall be effective immediately. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHING- TON, this day of , fia1 ,1989. ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: Maxin Anderson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: S- b'' - 8 ? PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: S - R - 97 PUBLISHED: S / 4! - 8 EFFECTIVE DATE: vo ... r (0,..# ORDINANCE NO. IS /S L. Van Dusen, Mayor June, 7, 1989 Harry Sanders Department of Elections 553A Administration Building Very truly yours, Attachments AUDREY GRUGER LOIS NORTH 0L4i31./ f1a111N District 1 District 4 District 7 King County Council Ron Sims, Chair Gerald Peterson, Council Administrator Room 402 ;King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296-1000 RE: CITY. OF TUKWILA - Annex - Fire District No. 1 - (election method) City Ordinance No. 1515, BRB File No. 1450, K C Ordinance No. 8731. All necessary documents and required reports are now a matter of record on the above subject, therefore the processing of this proposal is finalized. Accordingly, we are forwarding copies of the necessary documents to the various interested county departments and other agencies. Gerald A. Peterson Council Administrator' • By:. 2 $ h L L' CC: Department of Assessments Boundary Review Board Building and Land Development Division General Services Division METRO Planning Division + Planning b Graphics Department of Public Works Department of Public Safety Environmental Health Division Washington State Department of Ecology Kroll Maps Thomas Brothers Maps Chicago Title Insurance Company Commonwealth Land Title Insurance First American Title Company of WA Ticor Title Insurance Safeco Title Insurance Company Transamerica Title Insurance Company Washington Natural Gas Company K.C. C 911 Program Office of Finance - Don Robinson City of Tukwila I♦ CYNTHIA SULLIVAN RON SIMS GREG NICKELS District 2 District 5 District 8 Printed on recycled paper B ILL REAMS B RUCE LAING GARY GRANT District 3 District 6 District 9 King County Department of Public Works 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 April 21, 1989 Mr. Gerald A. Peterson Council Administrator COURTHOUSE Attention: Helene Mociulski, 402 Courthouse RE: Annexation to CITY OF TUKWILA (Fire District No. 1) Tukwila Ordinance No. 1503, BRB File No. 1450, King County Ordinance No. 8731 Dear Mr. Peterson: Roads Division staff have checked the legal description of the attached Tukwila Ordinance No. 1503 and find it unsatisfactory. The legal description contained in the city ordinance is not the same as that which was previously approved by the Boundary Review Board for this annexation. Please request the City of Tukwila to amend their Ordinance No. 1503 to include the proper legal description for the annexation as set forth in King County Ordinance No. 8731. The legal description attached to the city ordi- nance does not include many of the modifications required by the Boundary Review Board and does not adhere to Washington State law RCW 35.02.170. Any amending ordinance passed by Tukwila on this annexation should include any corresponding change to the effective date of March 31, 1989 which was established by the Tukwila City Ordinance No. 1503. If you have any questions on this matter please contact Rex H Knight, Manager, Engineering Services at 6 -3731. Very truly yours, , ..4,4 r L• uis J. Haff, P. County Road Engineer LJH:JRB:trs WP:(ES)L415 Enclosure: File JIJN 19 1989 cc: Tim Hill, King County Executive Ron Sims, District 5 Councilman Norm Maleng, King County Prosecuting Attorney Brice Martin, Executive Secretary, Washington State Boundary Review Board `,i.SNP".Nat'lmfl t •!;c a'ta'.df 7a�m'�'�' r tti t sk?2: 1 cc: Jim Chaffee Pat Brodin :!424 4k. girl ' - Az& LLu. DATE: April 6, 1989 TO: Jim Bergsma, King Co Dept of Public Works FROM: Moira Carr Bradshaw, Planner SUBJECT: Fire District No. 1 Legal Description City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 J • w { elf= i 11989 Attached are maps of how we would map the eastern boundary of the City as changed by the Fire District Annexation. The area in question is how to divide Tax Lot 44. We feel that as you follow the northeasterly railroad margin, you intersect the easterly production of the centerline of Edwards Avenue, before you pick up the southern half of Lot 44. Therefore, the southern part of Lot 44 should not be included. The majority of the southern half is already in Renton, which leaves only a small triangular area between the 30 -foot vacated right -of -way owned by the owner of Lot 33, which for the most part, is also in Renton. Please call me with your comments. �yl�4Ql, (Fire District 11 Revised) September 15 1988 Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approxi- mately 420 feet to the Southwest margin of Empire Way South (State Road #2); Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its intersec- tion with the East Right -of -Way line of SR -5 and the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 0182000195, said point being further defined as lying approximately 310 feet North of the North margin of South 126th Street ( as measured along said East Right -of -Way line of SR -5); `Thehcj Souther along .said. -of -Way. Line .to, an' lntersec- tio w ith ior thetheast' margin bf'l)nion Pacific. RaiIroad (AKA fOregon Washington'Railroad and Navigation Company); Thence „Southeasterly along said Northeasterly railroad margingto an intersection with the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14723 -04; Thence continuing along said Northeasterly railroad margin to4n.inter ' se:ct on with: Easterly production of the centerline. of Edward. Ave. (S. '1.390E :Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101; Thence Westerly along said Easterly production to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respec- tively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said line being also on the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East,. W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Line 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washington and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thence Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more 'acs to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; ' ".44.” ' 4 4 4 1 , Rp. of Tukwila to the West 2 . FOUR ANNEXATION ELECTIONS MAY OCCUR IN FEBRUARY 1989 The four annexation proposals: Fire District No. 1, Riverton, Foster, and Thorndyke are moving ahead. The Fire District No. 1 annexation proposal passed a major step on September 8,1988 when the King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) approved a modified annexation area. The attached map shows the area with the deletion of that portion east of the railroad tracks and west of Empire Way; an action taken to address the concerns of the City of Renton. King County was opposed to the proposed annexation without the inclusion of the 16th Avenue South Bridge; therefore, the BRB split the bridge in half bringing the boundary of the annexation area down the center of the Duwamish River to the existing Seattle city limits. A problem developed when the King County Council failed to meet a September 23, 1988 deadline to place the proposal on the November ballot. The City of Tukwila will consider a resolution requesting the King County Council to place the proposal on the February 1989 ballot. Meanwhile, Tukwila and King County staffs are working together to plan for the joint responsibility of owning and operating a drawbridge. The Riverton, Foster, and Thorndyke annexations are moving forward together. The Riverton proposal received a Tukwila pre- annexation Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning on October 3,1988. The Foster and Throndyke proposals will have their second public hearing on October 17, 1988 and pre-annexation Comprehensive Land Use Plans and zoning will be adopted shortly thereafter. These plans and zoning would be effective if and when the areas annex to the City of Tukwila. The King County Council requested that the BRB hold a public hearing on Riverton, Foster, and Thorndyke because of the conflict with the proposed Sea-Tac incorporation boundaries. The three Tukwila annexation areas are encompassed by the incorporation area. On Tuesday, November 15, 1988, the BRB will combine the hearings on the Sea-Tac incorporation and the three annexations. If additional time is needed, it will be continued to Thursday November 17, 1988. The hearing starts at 7:00 p.m. and will be at the Sea-Tac Red Lion, 18740 Pacific Highway S. After the hearing, the BRB will deliberate and direct their staff to prepare the necessary documents to be adopted at their next meeting. By December 23, 1988, the King County Council must request King County Elections to place these annexations on the February 7,1989 ballot. This period between BRB decision and County Council deadline and may not be enough time for Rivertdn, Foster and Thorndyke. Tukwila will ask the BRB and the County Council to act as quickly as possible. 1:.f all the annekation s are successful in February, Tukwila's population will increase by 8,017 to 12,717 and it's area increase by approximately 3.4 square miles to 7.9. C King County Records and Elections Division Election Section 553 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296.1565 MEMO TO: City of Tukwila FROM: Jane Hague, Manager Records and Elections Division DATE: January 4, 1989 Enclosed please find an Order of Election for two propositions This is to acknowledge receipt of your ordinance /resolution calling for a Special Election to be held on February 7, 1989 (vote -by- mail). The ballot title and text of the proposition(s) is that which will appear on the official ballot for the election. If you have any questions re- garding the title and /or text, please contact this office immediately upon receipt of this memorandum. Thank you for your assistance. JH /bs enc. .._111M.D. AN ORDER OF THE MANAGER OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS AS SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS WHEREAS, on December 23, 1988, the County Council of King County, Washington, did present their Ordinance No. 8731, dated November 23, 1988, wherein they request that a Special Election be held for the submission to the qualified electors of the area of Fire Protection District..No. 1 of a proposition on the question of annexation to the City of Tukwila and a proposition regarding whether the area, if annexed, would assume the indebtedness of the City of Tukwila; and WHEREAS, said County Council finds that an emergency exists and request that said Special Election be held on February 7, 1989; and WHEREAS, said Ordinance provides the ballot titles of said propositions; and WHEREAS, under provisions of Motion No. 7393 of the King County Council, dated December 19, 1988, this election, being an annexation election, will be a vote - by -mail election; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDERED by the Manager of Records and Elections, as Supervisor of Elections, that I do hereby concur in said request for a Special Election to be held on February 7, 1989, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors of said area the following propositions: PROPOSITION NO. 1 PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF AREA KNOWN AS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA Shall the area as described in this ordinance of unincorporated King County commonly known as King County Fire Protection District No. 1 be annexed to and be a part of the City of Tukwila and the zoning and land use regulations for the area as found in City of Tukwila ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467 be adopted? FOR ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS AGAINST ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS PROPOSITION NO. 2 ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS Shall all property within the area, upon annexation,.be assessed and taxed_.at._.the same rate and on the same basis as the property of the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation? FOR ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS AGAINST ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS September 15, 1988 Revision RECEIVED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Mev 22 PM 3: L3 FOR ` t . l • *iCll CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION (Fire District 11 Revised) BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C.#42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 °17'40" E 868.00 feet more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit L`ne and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the Seattle City Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way south); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's -- File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet, more or less to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue S.; Thence South along said margin to the centerline of South 112th Street, being on the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or less, to an intersection with the South lime of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street 138.28 feet more or less to the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 334840=162D; thence South 07 -00 -02 East 288.71 feet; thence North 69 -58 -16 West to a point 101.13 feet from the West margin of 51st Avenue South when measured along said lire; thence South 05 -16 -46 East to the existing north margin of South 114th L. Street; thence Easterly along said North margin 50 feet more or less to the existing SpMtttp r.itv limit i inp• Thence Southerly and Easterly along said Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,630.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Exhibit A Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District #1 Revised) September 15, 1988 Revision R 0E\ ", ►gip !1 " 22 Fri 3:43 Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approxi- mately 420 feet to the Southwest margin of Empire Way South (State Road #2); Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its intersec- tion with the East Right -of -Way line of SR -5 and the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 0182000195, said point being further defined as lying approximately 310 feet North of the North margin of South 126th Street ( as measured along said East Right -of -Way line of SR -5); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersec- tion with the Northeast margin of Union Pacific Railroad (AKA Oregon - Washington Railroad and Navigation Company); Thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly railroad margin to an intersection with the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14 -•23 -04; Thence continuing along said Northeasterly railroad margin to an inter- section with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101; Thence Westerly along said Easterly production to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respec- tively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said line being also on the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to tne West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Lane 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washington and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with- the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and nortnwesteriy line and tne Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thence Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Northwesterly along said City Limit Line of Tukwila to the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; -2- its finding with regard thereto on February 21, 1989, and a certified copy of the minutes reflecting such entry will be transmitted, along with the certified abstract of the vote, to the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to annex the area proposed for annexation without requiring it to assume any portion of the City's existing indebtedness, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation. The real property known as the Fire District No. :1 Annexation Area, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and shown on Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which are incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed to and made a part of the City of Tukwila as of March 31, 1989, and shall thereafter be subject to the zoning and land use regulations as adopted in City of Tukwila Ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467. Section 2. Assumption of .Indebtedness. Pursuant to the results of the annexation election, the property within the territory annexed hereby shall not be required to assume .through assessment or taxes, any indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, contracted prior to or existing as of the effective date of the annexation. Said property shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City to pay for any bonds issued or other debts contracted subsequent to the date of annexation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereby approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this �I 57 day- of t - FAQu A( ) , 1989. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CE* I ANDERSON APPRO AS TO FORM: OFFIC 0 THE CITY ATTORNEY By FI . WITH THE CITY CLERK: . . i /' 9 9 P ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: . - s / -F'9 PUBLISHED: 3 - 1 - 5P9 EFFECTIVE DATE: 1- 4- P9 ORDINANCE NO.: /So 3 0100T2 /L[N /JFC Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 October 19, 1988 1428C /hdm Introduced by: GRANT Proposed No.: 88 -781 ORDINANCE NB 7 3 1 AN ORDINANCE establishing the date of an election on the questions of annexation, zoning and assumption on indebtedness to the City of Tukwila of an unincorporated area known as King County Fire Protection District No. 1.- STATEMENT OF FACT: 1. The City of Tukwila, Washington, by Resolution No. 1090 has determined that it is in the public interest, health, safety and general welfare to provide for annexation of an area known as Fire District No. 1 in accordance with Chapter 35A.14 R.C.W. 2. Said resolution does satisfy the provisions of R.C.W. 35A.14.010 for qualification for annexation. 3. The King County Boundary Review Board has approved with modification in File No. 1450 dated September 8, 1988. 4. The City of Tukwila, by Resolution No. 1090 adopted October 10, 1988, concurs in the annexation of the area known as King County Fire Protection District 1 as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board and as provided by R.C.W. 35A.14.050. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. A special election shall be held on the 7th day of February, 1989, in accordance with R.C.W. 35A.14.050 to be held within the territory of the proposed annexation, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified voters within said territory the questions of annexation, zoning and assumption of indebtedness. SECTION 2. The number of registered voters within the subject areas is estimated at 2,czi as nearly as may be determined from available records. SECTION 3. The ballot title, as directed by statute, should be substantially as follows: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 • 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SECTION 4. The boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation are hereby described as follows: 20 BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East 21 Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 22 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line 23 of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 24 Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 E 868.00 feet more or less, to the 25 centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving 26 centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,400 feet tb the North 27 horder of the Ec`_h':a.st•.quar` ^ ^` rection 33, Township 24 North, l 4 East, W.M.; 28 I Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the 29 Westerly margin of airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way 30 !South to the East line of said Section 33; I Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle 31 ,City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City ;Limit Line and the East l'ne of Section 4, Township 23 North, 32 ;Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; 19 33 AGAINST ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS 1428C/hdm/10/19/88 -2- 8731 A. Shall the area as described in this ordinance of unincorporated King County commonly known as King County Fire Protection District No. 1 be annexed to and be a part of the City of Tukwila and the zoning and land use regulations for the area as found in City of Tukwila ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467 be adopted? FOR ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS AGAINST ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS B. Shall all property within the area, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as the property of the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation? FOR ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 1428C/hdm/10/19/88 -3- 87'31 e Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the Seattle City Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3 Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet, more or less to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3. Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue So.; Thence South along said margin to the centerline of South 112th Street, being on the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or less, to an intersection with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street 138.28 feet more or less to the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 334840 -1670; thence South 07 -00 -02 East 288.71 feet; thence North 69 -58 -16 West to a point 101.13 feet from the West margin of 51st Avenue South when measured along said line; thence South 05 -16 -46 East to the existing North margin of South 114th Street; thence Easterly along said North margin 50 feet more or less to the existing Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Southerly and Easterly along said Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,630.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approximately 420 feet to the Southwest margin of Empire Way South (State Road #2); Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its intersection with the East Right -of -Way line of SR -5 and the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 0182000195, said point being further defined as lying approximately 310 feet North of the North margin of South 126th Street (as measured along said East Right -of -Way line of SR -5); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersection with the Northeast margin of Union Pacific Railroad (AKA Oregon - Washington Railroad and Navigation Company); Thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly railroad margin to an intersection with '- '' h lino ^f *ho Southeast 1/4 of said Section 1w 23 -64, Thence continuing along said Northeasterly railroad margin to an intersection with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101; Thence Westerly along said Easterly production to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -or -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 1545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said 'line being also on the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21. 22 23 24 25 26 27 8731 Plats, Records of King County, Washington; 28 I Thence West along said South line and extension to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way 29 , South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; 30 I Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the. North margin of said South 124th Street; 31 32 33 Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Line 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79 in King County, Washington and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thence Southerly along said East margin ana city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Northwesterly along said City Limit Line of Tukwila to the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly extension of the South line.of Tract 22, of Riversiae Interurban Tracts; a .. _ . and ir `I ^ 1(1 nage. 74 of 1428C/hdm/10/19/88 -4- of ATTEST: Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Volume 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said south line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest ! corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of said Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and waterway, to the North line of Section 32, Township 24, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SECTION 5. The notice of election shall be published asrequired by law. INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this /71 day o , 1988. PASSED this i4 day of , 198B. 1, C1 of the Council APPROVED this 2, day of 1428C/hdm/10/19/88 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON King County Executive -5- fUaiePnbar 198 . 8731 Tn. Sin ANIL .a Sr THRF� OF THE b JAMIO$ RIVER s • • Cr ST PS. • .7. • L% sSTINC. UT'j 1 -I■ SZAT'TLE� n ST • ■ • � S I r. .,. , S. wear 1 6 E. ?Amoy . 1A/Ay T&ee• 1 ,. KING COUNTY -- Neer* M a&(,I4 or So. tx.J Srac,E.T • wcsT MARGIA JYitRu4il141 Ate �. ). •,. ;,.. -. I I •I , K , r 1 y QJ S :4% EKtST /sK• car Lim trs aF SEArrrE. FIRE DISTRICT * 1 ANNEXATION Tukwila .•••••■• Ono lanai Mon • 111 z1 1 • lA • = i rt, 3 t N' ST; wow MAI4IP. s OF SisJ $o sour jtikab,ty • ..se ►Ao ri.YT r.. • s•n r ( T UKWILA 4 V. .1 , ♦� ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TUXWILA (Fire Dist #1 s I rV COUNCIL DISTRICT 5 & *8 KING COUNTY ORD. NO. cp 1515 amending 1503 CITY ORD. NO. or DIST. RES. NO. , effective on or aboatr) -12.89 RE C : ~D CITY OF TUKW,, HAY 22 FM 3: 43 1 TUKWILA , ; cou Mct. I Li WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /5 03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA, ADOPTING ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, PROVIDING THAT SAID ANNEXED AREA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME ANY SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila received a petition certified as sufficient by the King County Prosecuting Attorney, calling for an election to vote upon annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila determined that the signatures on the Petition were sufficient and filed the Certificate of Sufficiency with the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1036 initially expressed its support for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official for the City issued a Declaration of Significance, and draft and final environmental impact statements, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1078, passed July 5, 1988, reconfirmed approval of annexation subject to final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330, and 35A.14.340, the City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for zoning and land use regulations for the area to become effective upon annexation, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board. approved the annexation with modifications in File No. 1450, dated September 8, 1988, and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila adopted Resolution No. 1090 on October 10, 1988, approving the annexation of the area as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board, providing that the area be subject to the zoning and land use regulations previously adopted, and requiring that the issue of assumption of indebtedness be submitted to the electorate of the area to be annexed, and WHEREAS, pursuant to King County Council Ordinance No. 8731, an election was held in the area proposed for annexation on February 7, 1989, with the results of said election being that the voters approved annexation together with the Llropoapd zoning and land use regulations and rejected assumption of the l:lty s` outstalluluy uwou6euua *00 iailia WHEREAS, the County Canvassing Board has submitted the Statement of Canvass to the King County Council, and the King County Council has entered 0100T2 /LEN /JFC Page 1 Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 91 Revised) September 15, 1988 Revision pr (2 ' 33 MAY 22 F;i 3: L+3 tipY COUNCIL Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Fuget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly exten- sion of the South line of Tract 22, of Riverside Interurban Tracts; as recorded in Vol. 10, page 74 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence West along said South line and extension to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Vol. 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; Township 23 North, Range 4 East, N.M.; Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of said Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and waterway, to the North line of Section 32, Township 24, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WP:(ES)P5 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /503 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA, ADOPTING ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR THE ANNEXED AREA, PROVIDING THAT SAID ANNEXED AREA SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO ASSUME ANY SHARE OF THE CITY'S EXISTING INDEBTEDNESS AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila received a petition certified as sufficient by the King County Prosecuting Attorney, calling for an election to vote upon annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City, and WHEREAS, the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila determined that the signatures on the Petition were sufficient and filed the Certificate of Sufficiency with the City Council, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1036 initially expressed its support for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official for the City issued a Declaration of Significance, and draft and final environmental impact statements, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1078, passed July 5. 1358. reconfirmed approval of annexation subject to final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330, and 35A.14.340, the City Council adopted Ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for zoning and land use regulations for the area to become effective upon annexation, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board approved the annexation with modifications in File No. 1450, dated September 8, 1988, and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila adopted. Resolution No. 1090 on October 13. 1988, approving the annexation of the area as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board, providing that the area be subject to the zoning and land use regulations previously adopted, and requiring that the issue ;: assumption of indebtedness be submitted to the electorate of the area _3 �a annexed, and WHEREAS, pursuant to King County Council Ordinance No. 8731, an elect ::n was held in the area proposed for annexation on February 7, 1989, with results of said election being that the voters approved annexation toge_-a: with the proposed zoning and land use regulations and rejected assumption the City's outstanding indebtedness, and- WHEREAS, the County Canvassing Board has submitted the Statement Canvass to the King County' Council, and the King County Council has ente:a� O100T2 /LLH /JFc Page 1 its finding with regard thereto on February 21, 1989, and a certified copy of the minutes reflecting such entry will be transmitted, along with the certified abstract of the vote, to the City Clerk, and WHEREAS,. the City Council has determined to annex the area proposed for annexation without requiring it to assume any portion of the City's existing indebtedness, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Annexation. The real property known as the Fire District No. ,1 Annexation Area, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto, and shown on Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which are incorporated herein.by this reference as if set forth in full, should be and hereby is annexed . to and made a part of the City of Tukwila as of March 31, 1989, and shall thereafter be subject to the zoning and land use regulations as adopted in City of Tukwila Ordinance Nos. 1466 and 1467. Section 2. Assumption of Indebtedness. Pursuant to the results of the annexation election, the property within the territory annexed hereby shall not be required to assume through assessment or taxes, any indebtedness, bonded or otherwise, contracted prior to or existing as of the effective date of the annexation. Said property shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City to pay for any bonds issued or other debts contracted subsequent to the date of annexation. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereby approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this ,-))57 day of FF,eu2u A R ( , 1989. ,. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: ANDERSON APP AS TO FORM: OFFIC 0 THE CITY ATTORNEY By FI WITH THE CITY CLERK: A - a /- F, P ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: et-A/-611 PUBLISHED: Jr-/-S"? EFFECTIVE DATE: 1 - 4-09 ORDINANCE NO.: /So 3 C_, C.. KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 EXHIBIT A (Legal is written to street centerlines) BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of East Marginal Way South and the westerly production of the centerline of South Rose Street; THENCE southeasterly along the centerline of East Marginal Way South to a point which lies south 66 °18'57" west from a point "A" described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the east margin of East Marginal Way South, said point being north 23 ° 41'03" west a distance of 351.24 feet along said margin from the intersection of the south line of Henry Van Asselt donation land claim No. 50, with the east margin of East Marginal Way South, as marked on the west boundary of Boeing Field, said point also being the point of intersection of said east- erly margin with the shore line of the Duwamish River as established by Commer- cial Waterway District No. 1; THENCE continuing north 23 °41'03" west along said last margin a distance of 461.75 feet to Point "A" and end of said description; THENCE north 66 ° 18'57" east to Point "A "; THENCE continuing north 66 • 18'57w east at right angles to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South a distance of 149 feet along the northwesterly line of Parcel "B" of a tract of land conveyed to Friday, Inc., by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5286620; THENCE south 23 ° 41'03" east parallel to said easterly margin a distance of 259 feet; THENCE south 66 ° 18'57" west a distance of 149 feet to an intersection with the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South said intersection being a point 259 feet southeast of Point "A "; THENCE continuing south 66 0 18'57" west to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE southeasterly on said centerline to the centerline of South Barton Street extended westerly; THENCE easterly along said extension and centerline of South Barton Street to the west margin of Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way; THENCE southerly along said west margin of Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way and the westerly city limits of the City : 6f Seattle, to the centerline of South 104th Street; THENCE east along South'104th Street to the easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); THENCE south along said easterly boundary 620 feet, more or less, to the northerly margin of South 107th Street; THENCE in a south- easterly direction along said northerly margin to the intersection of the east line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 Legal Description King County F( Protection District No. 1 Page 2 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the north line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; THENCE north along the east line of said subdivision 940 feet, more or less, to the north line of said subdivision, also known as the centerline of South 104th Street; THENCE east along said centerline to the centerline of 51st Avenue South; THENCE south along 51st Avenue South to the centerline of South 112th Street, being the northeast corner of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; THENCE continuing south along the east line of said Section 10, to an intersection with the south line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street, which is a point on the east line of said Section 10, distant 452.30 feet south from the northeast corner of said section; THENCE. westerly on the south line of said street to the northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C. D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County; THENCE southerly on the west side of said lot to the north line of South 114th Street, sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted in said addition; THENCE easterly along said north line to the present city limits on the east line of said Section 10; THENCE south on said east line to a point approximately 2,600 feet south of the northeast corner of Section 10 and on the centerline of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; THENCE east approximately 1,100 feet to the northerly production of the centerline of Block 3, Allentown Acres, as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 22, Records of King County; THENCE southerly along said northerly production and said centerline of said Block 3 to an intersection with the centerline of State Road No. 2; THENCE southeasterly along said centerline to the intersection:of the north and south centerline of Section 13, Twp 23 N., Range 4E., W.M.; THENCE south along said north and south centerline to the south line of South 140th Street; THENCE westerly and southwesterly along the southerly line of South 140th Street, also known as Beacon Coal Mine Company Road, to the northerly. line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; THENCE :southwesterly along said northerly line to the centerline of 68th Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8, Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); THENCE northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road, County Road No. 8 and Monster Road), as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats, Legal Description King County FiL Protection District No. 1 Page 3 page 75, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said road centerline 250 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th Street), as platted in C. D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, Records of King County; THENCE westerly along said extension 700 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right - of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of deeds, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said margin 2,400 feet, more or less, to the west line of the northeast 1/4 of Section 14 in said T23N, R4E, W.M.; THENCE southerly along said west line, 120 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE along said thread in a northwesterly direction to the intersection with the southeasterly production of the northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washington; THENCE northwesterly along said production and said northeasterly margin respectively, to intersection with the southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; THENCE southwesterly along said southeasterly margin to the southeasterly production of the northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said plat; THENCE northwesterly along said southeasterly production and said northeasterly margin to the southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; THENCE southwesterly along said southeasterly margin to the southwest margin of South 133rd Street; THENCE southeasterly along the southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE along said thread in a general northwesterly direction to the intersection with the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said southeasterly extension and said southwesterly margin 1,050 feet, more or less, to an intersection: with the northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; THENCE southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE westerly along said thread 2,150 feet, more or less to a point opposite the south line of Tract 33, Riverside Interurban Tracts, unrecorded; (THENCE west to the west line of the Puget South Electric Railway right -of -way; THENCE north Legal Description King County Fire Protection District No. I Page 4 along the west line of said right -of -way approximately 850 feet to a point opposite the south line of Tract 22, of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; THENCE west 1,000 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the centerline of South 124th Street;) THENCE continuing westerly along said centerline to the southerly prolongation of the west line of Block 2, Riverton Addition, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, Records of King County, Washington; THENCE northerly along said west line and its southerly prolongation to the northwest corner of said Block 2; THENCE northerly along the east line of the west 820 feet of said Section 10 to a point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the west quarter corner of Section 10; THENCE south along the west line thereof 29.35 feet to the south margin of an easement granted to S. H. Vincent dated August 10, 1907, recorded under Auditor's File No. 503128; THENCE east along said south margin .820 feet; THENCE south 421.15 feet to Point "B" and END OF DESCRIPTION; THENCE east parallel to the north line of Government Lot 15 to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE northerly along said centerline to the south line of the north 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; THENCE westerly along said south line to the west line of Section 10; THENCE northerly along the west line of said Section 10 to (the north line of Government Lot 6 of said Section 10; THENCE easterly along the north line of said Government Lot 6 to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE northerly along said centerline to) the east line of the Duwamish River; THENCE westerly. and northerly along east line of the Duwamish River, and waterway to the centerline of South Rose Street, extended westerly; THENCE easterly along the centerline of South Rose Street, extended to POINT OF BEGINNING. Except Lots 7, 8°and 9, Block 22, C. D. Hillmans Meadow Gardens Division No. 3, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 86, Records of King County. Legal Description King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 5 ALSO. INCLUDING EAST MARGINAL WAY CORPORATE PARK Lots 1 to 16, vacated Block 3 and Lots 1 to 8, vacated Block 4, in the Plat of Riverton, being a replat of Riverside Interurban Tracts, recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, in King County, Washington; together with the portions of 34th Avenue South and 123rd Street which attached to said lots by operation of law; also that portion of Government Lot 15, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR 599) with the westerly margin of East Marginal Way in the northwest quarter of said Section 10; THENCE south 16'29'06" east along said westerly margin 534.84 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE south 78 ° 43'27" west 415.05 feet; THENCE north 87 °30'37" west 726.40 feet to the west line of said Government Lot 15; THENCE south O1 ° 48'37" west along said west line to the north line of the aforesaid plat of Riverton; THENCE easterly along said north line to a. line parallel to and 820 feet from the west line of said Government Lot 15; THENCE northerly along said parallel line 376.01 feet to the northwest corner of the Traverso property as described in deed recorded under Auditor's File Number 5612479; THENCE easterly along the north line of said Traverso property 474.74 feet to the westerly margin of East Marginal Way; THENCE northerly along said west margin to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Legal Description King County Fire Protection District. No. 1 Page 6 AND ALSO INCLUDING A PORTION OF KING COUNTY AIRPORT A tract of land comprised of that portion of Boeing Field /King County Interna- tional Airport property located outside of the Seattle city limits, situated in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, then along the easterly border of said Section 4 which is also the Seattle City Limit Line bearing south 0'20'05" west 1,256 feet, more or less, to the northerly margin of South Norfolk Street; then north 88'38'44" west 35 feet; then north 28'18'38" west 740.43 feet; then north 28 west 887.98 feet; then south 67 °27'45" west 596.56 feet; then south 89'13'33" west 37.35 feet to a point on the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then following said margin morth 23 ° 41'00" west 1,373.66 feet; then south 89 ° 27'50" east 380 feet; then north 150 feet; then north 89'27'50" west 456.27 feet; then north 23 °40'59" west 84.67 feet; then north 89 °58'17" east 518.49 feet; then north 29 °52'38" west 372.42 feet; then south 89 west 474.62 feet to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then along said margin north 23'41'02" west 1,096.57 feet; then north 66'18'58" east 149 feet; then north 23 °41'02" west 259 feet; then south 66'18'58" west 149 feet to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then along said margin north 23 °41'02" west 926.52 feet; then along a curve to the left having a radius of 2,914.92 feet, a chord of 1,278.21 feet and an arc distance of 1,288.68 feet; then north 49 °00'52" west 643.39 feet to the north line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W111aieette Meridian; then along said north line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line south 89'17'40" east 868 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Ouwamish River; then following south- erly and easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,400 feet to the north border of the southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said section border which also is • Legal Description King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 7 the Seattle City Limit Line south 88 °32'07" east 1,895 feet, more or less, to . the westerly margin of Airport Way South; then along said margin south 17 east 199 feet, more or less; then south 21 °47'12" west 25 feet; then also along the westerly margin of Airport Way South, south 17 ° 32'18" east 1,851 feet, more or less, to the easterly border of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said easterly border, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line 685 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said tract of land contains an area of approximately 165 acres. I, JOANNE JOHNSON A F F .0 A V 1 T O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [� Planning Commission Agenda Packet J Short Subdivision Agenda Packet J Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit C1 Shoreline Management Permit <5.1ZieN1 >Mirs,m. , ac.. ..um_vre. w.}ccw.r,cv>,c.:.*.Mma . a . ar,:.ea. was mailed to each of the following addresses on (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project FIRE DIST #1 BROCHURE File Number 87-1 —A .......,....- . w....,... �,......,.. A.,..'... n..<... u......., wc..,... r.. w.. w�,. v.,. so .eYmm.'�+ziresarn'k.'R7.lL•'i:� a:'.., %.,' OF DISTR I,._`UT I ON hereby declare that: O Determination of Nonsignificance [[ Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action Q Official Notice [i Other 0 Other STATUS OF FIRE DIST #1 RROCHURE FRIDAY, DECEMBER 2. 19RR JL- Signatur , 19 . City of Tukwila 2400 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104-7005 Office Of The City Attorney (206) 624-1040 Helene Mocivlski King County Council Clerk's Office 402 King County Courthouse Third and James Streets Seattle, WA 98104 Re: Fire Protection District No. 1 Dear Ms. Mocivlski: October 12, 1988 Enclosed herewith for formal filing with your office is City of Tukwila Resolution No. 1090, approving the annexa- tion of the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area as modified by the Boundary Review Board. The resolution also requests that the issue of annexation be placed on the ballot for February 7, 1989, which we under- stand to be the next available special election date. I also want to confirm my understanding that the ordinance necessary for placing this matter on the ballot is currently being drafted, and that it will be placed before the King County Council for action within the next two weeks. We request notification if for any reason there is to be any delay in that schedule. Thank you very much for your help and cooperation. JFC/rj cc. Mayor Van Dusen Mabel J. Harris Moira Bradshaw Very truly yours, OF CE O F T E CITY ATTORNEY / olgro .....oforom VIA ;d1ESIENWER 3 • WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1036, previously expressed support for the proposed annexation and expressed an intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the City Council, in Resolution 1079, passed July 5, 1988, reconfirmed approval of annexation of the area known as Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area subject to final determination of the boundary by the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board has now determined and approved a modified boundary for the annexation area which decision, in File No. 1450, is dated September 8, 1988; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area, as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board in its decision of September 8, 1988. The modified area is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and legally described in Exhibit B attached hereto, both of which exhibits are incorporated herein. The Council requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held within the proposed annexation area on February 7, 1989, the next available special election date, to decide the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed together with the question of annexation, the adoption of said zoning and land use regulations to be effective upon annexation. 3553CS/405A CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO /D 9 � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A MODIFIED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION Page 1 Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3553C5/405A OFFIC. Ilf •F THE CITY ATT / 401' BY r .I.,. , /i+ /!1 " FI D WITH THE CITY CLERK: /0 /0^ g " PA SED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: /0 'i0 8 RESOLUTION NO.: /090 COUNCIL PRESID EL J. HARRIS I FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Modified FIRE DISTRICT di Annexation Boundary Study Area Boundary �8- • IMO •i•IMU1i %mss %IMII CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,ISC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. T NORTH EXHIBIT A J September 15, 1988 Revision LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION (Fire District #1 Revised) 1 BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 °17'40" E 868.00 feet more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit Line and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the Seattle City Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way south); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet, more or less to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue S.; Thence South along said margin to the centerline of South 112th Street, being on the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or less, to an intersection with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street 138.28 feet more or less to the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 334840 -1670; thence South 07 -00 -02 East 288.71 feet; thence North 69 -58 -16 West to a point 101.13 feet from the West margin of 51st Avenue South when measured along said line; thence South 05 -16 -46 East to the existing north margin of South 114th Street; thence Easterly along said North margin 50 feet more or less to the existing Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Southerly and Easterly along said Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,630.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District #1 Revised) September 15, 1988 Revision Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approxi- mately 420 feet to the Southwest margin of Empire Way South (Stzte Road #2); Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its intersec- tion with the East Right -of -Way line of SR -5 and the Northwesterly corner of tax lot 0182000195, said point being further defined as lying approximately 310 feet North of the North margin of South 126th Street ( as measured along said East Right -of -Way line of SR -5); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line to an inteesec- tion with the Northeast margin of Union Pacific Railroad (AKA Oregon - Washington Railroad and Navigation Company); Thence Southeasterly along said Northeasterly railroad margin tow an intersection with the North line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14 - •23 - 04; Thence continuing along said Northeasterly railroad margin to an inter- section with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101; Thence Westerly along said Easterly production to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respec- tively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825 page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said line being also on the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Line 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washington and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of • the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thence Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Northwesterly along said City Limit Line of Tukwila to the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; -2- • Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District #1 Revised) Septemner 15, 1988 Revision Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly exten- sion of the South line of Tract 22, of Riverside Interurban Tracts; as ... recorded in Vol. 10, page 74 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence West along said South line and extension to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Vol. 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East. Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of said Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and waterway, to the North line of Section 32, Township 24, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. WP:(ES)P5 October 10, 1988 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF COUNCIL MEMBERS OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE OLD BUSINESS Briefing on the fiscal impact of annex- ing Riverton, Foster & Thorndyke area annexations. Res. #1090, approving a modified Fire Dist. #1 annexation area election method annex- ation. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL City Hall SPECIAL MEETING. Council Chambers M I N U T E S Mayor Van Dusen called the Special Meeting to order and led the Councilmembers and audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. MABEL J. HARRIS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT), JOE H. DUFFIE, EDGAR D. BAUCH, MARILYN G. STOKNES, JOAN HERNANDEZ, DENNIS L. ROBERTSON, CLARENCE B. MORIWAKI. Maxine Anderson (City Clerk), Rick Beeler (Planning Director), John Colgrove (City Attorney), Alan Doerschel (Finance Director), Ross Earnst (Public Works Director), John McFarland (City Administrator), Robert McQueen (Assistant Police Chief), Nick Olivas (Assistant Fire Chief), Viki Witschger (Personnel Officer). John McFarland, City Administrator, reviewed the background of the Fire District #1, Foster /Riverton /Thorndyke annexation areas. The estimates were derived from the EIS completed on the Fire District #1 proposal, conversations with King County, and the development of a series of assumptions relating to the provision of services by the City. The analyses were based on assumptions which will influence the levels of service and the anticipated expenditures related to the two areas. The assumptions of the projected revenues have a high degree of reliability. Estimated expenditures contain more variables and are not as accurate as the revenue projections. Split levels of service between the existing incorporated areas and any newly annexed area, are not acceptable as a general policy. Citizen requests for service and assistance will increase upon annexation to the city. The infrastructure in the areas under consideration have not been maintained to City standards by King County. Staff specialization and decentralization of services will likely occur. Problem solving and legislative issues will be more complex. Liability exposures and coverages will increase. An increase in the importance of the city's role in regional issues will occur. No large new commercial developments are planned for any of the areas under consideration. There are a number of "unknown" factors associated with the annexations that will influence the estimated expenditures. The definition of the three levels of service was explained. Other issues that need to be revisited in considering the merits of either or both of the proposals would be: a phase -in period will be required if either annexation is successful. This will allow for necessary time needed to staff, train, and equip the organization to meet expanded service delivery area; current posture of King County in regard to cooperation during transition period is not encouraging; Protracted administrative and perhaps legal actions will likely ensure; revenue shortfalls can be addressed through reduction in services or through alternative financing sources; certain programs identified by individual departments, such as storm water and permitting, will generate revenue that should assist in off - setting anticipated expenditures. Corresponding adjustments will need to be made in the revenue projections to take this into consideration. Stuart Garnett, audience, asked if the bridge will generate money revenues for the City? Alan Doerschel, Finance Director, said not unless the City puts a toll on the birdge. Mr. Garnett, audience, stated with the amount of business in Fire District #1 there should be increase in revenue. The Fire District pays its own way. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY BAUCH, THAT RESOLUTION #1090 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. City Attorney John Colgrove read by title only a resolution of the City of Tukwila, Washington, approving a modified fire TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL SPEC1._ MEETING MINUTES October 10, 1988 Page 2 OLD BUSINESS - Contd. Res. #1090, approving a modified F. D. #1 annexation area elec- tion method annexation -- contd. ADJOURNMENT 7:54 P.M. protection District #1 annexation area election method annexation. MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY BAUCH, THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE RESOLUTION AS READ. * Council President Harris asked if administration had met with the County and if there was any more news. Mayor Van Dusen said there is nothing new to report. Councilperson Stoknes said from the people point of view the Council is very positive about this. The bridge is the question mark. The financial aspect is overwhelming. Councilmember Moriwaki said he is looking forward to the annexation. It is an area that will likely develop and change from industrial to retail. It is a good move for the City of Tukwila to annex. Council President Harris stated she agreed with Councilmember Moriwaki. The bridge is an unknown factor. Councilmember Duffie stated he is in favor of the resolution. Councilmember Bauch commented that most of the discussion has been financial. If there is impact it will be on the people of the City who pay the taxes. There will have to be an adjustment on the rates and the business people will pay that. None of the businesses have been represented here. Councilmember Hernandez said the City has been reviewing figures and they have been astounding. We have not solved the problem of the bridge and what the cost - sharing will be with the County. Councilmember Robertson said the bridge is a concern. There have been fears and concerns. He felt sure the issue of the bridge could be resolved with the County. Also a concern has been as to how fast the City could grow. The staff is competent and will rise to the challenge. He stated he was in favor of the annexation. Councilmember Stoknes said her concern was the fire and police service and the people who might be in need of help. This concern was for the citizens of Tukwila as well as the annexation areas. Stuart Garnett, audience, stated Fire District #1 is coming to the City with almost $1 million. They have goodequipment and a new aid car. The Fire District will carry their own weight. *MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT THE SPECIAL MEETING ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Gary L. Van Dusen N rma Booher, Recording Secretary October 10, 1988 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE M' 1 NG 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT OFFICIALS IN ATTENDANCE EXECUTIVE SESSION 8:03 - 8:40 P.M. SPECIAL ISSUES Discussion on prop. street widening at 14026 55th S. Discussion on Comp. Land Use Plan Map & Zoning Changes. MINUTES O /d5 ,/ City Hall Council Chambers Council President Harris called the Committee of the Whole Meeting to order at 8:02 P.M. MABEL J. HARRIS (COUNCIL PRESIDENT), JOE H. DUFFIE, EDGAR D. BAUCH, MARILYN G. STOKNES, JOAN HERNANDEZ, DENNIS L. ROBERTSON, CLARENCE B. MORIWAKI. Maxine Anderson (City Clerk), Rick Beeler (Planning Director), John Colgrove (City Attorney), Alan Doerschel (Finance Director), Ross Earnst (Public Works Director), John McFarland (City Administrator), Robert McQueen (Assistant Police Chief), Nick Olivas (Assistant Fire Chief), Viki Witschger (Personnel Officer). MOVED BY MORIWAKI, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON. WHAT C GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTI IONS SWEENEY PROPERTY CONDEMNATION. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY BAUCH, SECONDED BY DUFFIE, THAT COUNCIL ADJOURN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. MOTION CARRIED. Council President Harris called the Committee of the Whole Meeting back to order, with Councilmembers' present as previusly listed. Ross Earnst, Public Works Director, explained the need for the easement for street widening and drainage of abutting property. Mr. Bronson is the owner and the alternatives would be: Mr. Bronson provide an easement for wideni -g 55th and a pit drain for storm runoff. This is alternative pr 'erred by Mr. Bronson as it is the best economically for him; ride an easement and split the cost (50/50) of constructing a .torm drain stub across 55th to the northwest corner of his property; dedicate right -of -way and split the storm drain stub cost; leave property as is (no easement or dedication) and use a pit for storm drainage; leave property as is and construct storm drain stub. Mr. Earnst said the developer would be happy to leave the street as it is. The City wants to change it; get the easement and come back and put in curbs and sidewalk. A tree will have to be removed. Gordon Bronson, property owner, stated he has owned the property since June 1987. There is enough property to sub - divide. There is a house rented until June 1988. The Planning Department has indicated they will okay the short plat if the house is removed. Mayor Van Dusen stated this matter is premature in coming to the Council as the short plat has not been approved. Councilmember Moriwaki stated the City has built the street and now it looks awkward. The Council can see what needs to be done. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, presented the 1989 projects for the Planning Department: CBD Sidewalk Plan, Transportation Policy Plan, Sign Code revision, Zoning Code revision, Annexation "boarding," Tukwila 2000, Parks and Open Space Plan, Comprehensive Plan /Zoning Code revision, Cascade annexation. He stated they would like the Council to prioritize the top four projects. The Planning Commission has a heavy workload and they will have to meet twice a month. He stated it is possible the Planning Departmen can get all of the projects done in 1989 except the last two. Councilmember Bauch asked how the Planning Commission is involved in the Transportation Policy Plan? Mr. Beeler said the Council could take that over if they wished. Councilmember Moriwaki said he would like to see a category in the Comprehensive Plan /Zoning for recreation. COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ML,iING MINUTES October 10, 1988 Page 2 SPECIAL ISSUES Disc. on Comp. Land Use Plan Map & Zoning Changes - contd. REPORTS Mayor ADJOURNMENT 10:25 P.M. Councilmember Hernandez stated if Transportation is taken out she would like to see zoning code revision (multi-family cascading). Mr. Beller said the earliest the Planning Department could work on that would be January. Councilmember Stoknes stated she would like the Council to prioritize two of the suggested changes to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and Zoning Code. Council President Harris stated the consensus of the Council was that Items 2 and 8 (Need a new zoning designation for open space/wooded hillsides to preserve views and lessen site impacts; Limit density for housing, make pleasant visual effect.) for 1989. \ / Mayor Van Dusen reported on the Snoqualmie Retreat held two week previous. Valuable information about expansion of ,the area was\ eceived. / MOVED BY DU4JE, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT THECOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEEtkNG ADJOURN. MOTION CARRIED. / Mabel J. Harris, Co ncil Preside0 • Booher,.Recordtng L 0 /6 it' Fi�itYt�: S�si4. i4fi% uaxsc�nrwy.,........,.«....... �............,.... �.. w... as... w n+ ow x �.. �.. ..._�..:. .« . ;.....r....,w CC: John F. Cosgrove, Esq., of Attorneys for Tukwila SEP 3 0 1988 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 360C1 3600136th E. Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 9 e�alb bdbig,(�996 -7096 31 TO: DOROTHY OWENS, Clerk of the Council FM: G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary RE: FILE NO. 1450 - CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed Annexation (King County Fire Protection Dist. #1) This will confirm that the legal transmitted to you by Jim Bergsma of the King County Department of Public Works may be substituted in the Board's Resolution Land Hearing Decision for that legal attached and marked Exhibit A, Pages Eighteen through Twenty -two. There are no major differences between the two legals; there are some minor technical corrections (e.g., substituting the Union Pacific for Burlington Northern in one area), the areas where portions of the legal were eliminated by drawing lines through the text have been removed, and this version is single spaced while Exhibit A was typed double spaced. It fully reflects the Board's intent and as such, may be substituted as indicated above. eC City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Mayor Gary Van Dusen Ross E =t, Public Works Director September 23, 1988 September 20, 1988 Fire District #1 Annexation Meeting TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Attendees: King County - Tim Ceir, Larry Brubaker, Bob Williams, Rex Knight, Cynthia Walker, Dave Lawson City of Tukwila - Rick Beeler, Alan Doerschel, Ross Earnst, John Colgrove Items addressed at the meeting were: \.• .. ; I. Schedule for the election and the process. (See the attached memo from the City Attorney). II. Revenues and Expenses. We submitted and discussed the attached preliminary revenue /expenditure estimates. The county wants to work the same thing up for the County prior to discussing /negotiating bridge costs. etc. Alan and Larry Brubaker will work on those next week. III. Service area definitions. We had difficulty discussing service area because the County Council staff kept wanting to negotiate the "unfair" boundaries by the Boundary Review Board. We at this point gave them our starting point for negotiation of share of costs for major items. They were as follows: 1. 16th Avenue Bridge A. Split operating and maintenance cost 25% Tukwila, 75% King County - King County operates and maintains the bridge. $250,000 B. Split C.I.P. on the bridge 50/50. a. '. �`+_ i�. U, ti�1�Sa�g"gMkZiMi! 'v:4Pio99l:lraCY xc To: Mayor Van Dusen MEMO Sept. 23, 1988 page 2 Rick Beeler Alan Doerschel John Colgrove file: 3.31.01 r.4Ladxer!uo.ra:.taarw wa ralvma t...o:∎ abutment. 41. ulkiSf C. King County does the study on the failing $150,000 D. King County paints the bridge. 2. King County pay for East Marginal Way Bridge 3. Share 50/50 costs of widening East Marginal Way $150,000 $600,000 $700,000 4. Service agreement to provide police and public works services on reimbursable basis to county island, except for bridge. 5. Reject paying revenue share after annexation. IV. The next meeting will be held October 3 at 2:00 at King County Public Works. Attachments: 2 CD:DISK 8 16THBRID.RAE i" X517. fiIS�T�ASi�H�� .�ifiG'�.�frfi > "• %`:'. ; ':.f ':�, .e; tiifi'K ::�ix°:`r r::r. »; �i ±•'* t;:tir;:try ti:rx;F?.x;' its :xi:YU:Xt�s<a�3rzti Ca:'�car.'t:arrx =a• <•r::�rrP� ,rxcma e,s. ,u,:rvArormewam rve7•rankeeloxev of rrsrax..r. Police Fire Planning Public Works Administrative Street Maintenance 16th Avenue Bridge (1) Capital Costs (Streets, Parks and Surface Water) (2) Facility Costs (Impact of Annexation) (3) Total Expenditures Estimated Shortfall (2) Based on 5 -year amortized cost. (3) Based on current cost of renting office space. City of Tukwila PRELIMINARY REVENUE /EXPENDITURE ESTIMATES Fire District No. 1 Annexation RANGE Low Nigh Revenues Estimates $1,945,000 $2,217,000 Expenditures: $ 313,500 $ 477,500 606,500 836,000 106,500 270,000 161,000 189,000 159,000 223,000 164,000 218,000 $2,465,500 $3,493,500 ($ 620,500) ($1,276,500) 225,000 450,000 630,000 680,000 100,000 150,000 (1) Total maintenance (long- and short -term for bridge). The low estimate is Tukwila paying half and the high estimate is Tukwila paying all per County Council staff. Estimate for bridge replacement is not included. Mr. Steve Miller King County Council 402 King County Courthouse Third and James Streets Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Steve: F� I" 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -7005 S E P 201988\ Office Of The City Attorney (206) 6 - 2400 Columbia Center September 23, 1988 Re: Annexation of Fire District #1 Annexation Area BRB File No. 1450 This is to confirm the facts as I understand them and the procedures and schedules agreed to at the joint staff meeting on September 20, 1988. First of all, I understand that the legal description attached to the BRB ruling has now been corrected and a complete written decision is now on file with the County Council. Secondly, it has been agreed that whatever the somewhat confusing statutes may require, past practice has been that after a BRB decision the County will take no action until the annexing city gives evidence of its desire to proceed. In addition, in this particular instance, the prior approving Tukwila resolution specifically reserved the right to withdraw such approval dependent upon action of the BRB. The decision of the BRB substantially and significantly modified the proposed annexation area. It is agreed, therefore, that the County Council will not act unless and until it receives a further resolution from Tukwila approving the modified annexation area. Since it is now impossible to have a county ordinance in place the required 45 days before the November election date, it is agreed that the election, if any, will be held in February, 1989, RCW 35A.14.050 notwithstanding. With the time pressure of trying to make the November 1988 election removed, the Tukwila City Council wishes to give the matter thorough consideration. We propose that the City Council will review and discuss the matter at its committee of the whole meeting on September 26, and will take formal action, either approving or disapproving the modified annexation area, at its next regular meeting on October 3. The Council's formal resolution will be filed with the County Council no later than October 10. If the above facts and procedures are agreed to and approved by the County, please so indicate on a copy of this letter. We appreciate the County's cooperation in resolving these matters. JFC /rj Very truly yours, OFFICE OF T C 1 E C TY ATTORNEY n F. g r •.F The above facts and procedures are acknowledged and agreed to this day of September, 1988. By Steve Miller W C A Dear John, ( WASHINGTON CITIES INSURANCE AUTHORITY 01-0 Mr. John McFarland City Manager City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 September 22, 1988 15215 52nd Ave. South, Suite 10 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 764-6471 SCAN 443 -6471 .E.P 2 1988 \ Thank you for providing the opportunity to view, first hand, the proposed area of annexation north of the City. Moira was an interesting and informative guide and I believe I learned as much from the excursion as you did. The City has already addressed one of the major risk management concerns regarding the assumption of existing road conditions by having a comprehensive traffic study completed. This should have identified intersections and sections of roadway suffering a high number of serious accidents. If any existed, the City would want to be in a position to rectify those areas immediately after the annexation so as not to inherit a substantial liability. Other major risk management concerns relative to annexation include: Pollution - would the City inherit old landfill sites or other areas which may have served as storage or disposal of toxic wastes? If so, the City would also inherit the liability for clean -up, which isn't covered by any policy of insurance. Bridges & roadways - in addition to the potential for assuming a poorly- designed stretch of roadway, the City will also find itself responsible, in whole or part, for the maintenance of bridges. Please review the material I have enclosed regarding an accident on a bridge in Everett which cost the City $75,000 and the State $2 million (plus defense costs for both). At issue was the division of maintenance responsibility for the bridge. I strongly Page 2 Mr. John McFarland City of Tukwila September 22, 1988 recommend that written contracts be negotiated with either the State or County, as appropriate, clearly defining each entity's maintenance responsibility. The enclosed materials ought to help. The next logical step after the agreements are in place would be to ensure that City employees complete and document those items for which the City is responsible. This may seem obvious, but could be of such import in the defense of a similar case as to bear stating. On a closing note regarding bridges, do we know the structural integrity of the pedestrian bridge over the river off 42nd Avenue South? Water runoff /subsidence issues - Much of the proposed areas is on low ground with little or no storm water runoff /collection systems. Existing ditches appeared poorly maintained. The city will assume potential responsibility /liability for flooding problems in the low -lying areas, and land subsidence, if any, in the area south of Ryan Way (east of I -5). A comprehensive storm water drainage study ought to be in Tukwila's future to address these areas of concern. Sub - standard water system /inadequate fireflows - It is my understanding that the City is aware that these situations already exist. The City should be prepared to promptly address these inadequacies to reduce its liability potential. Railroad crossings - while there do not appear to be many roadways crossing over the railroad tracks, there are several driveways along E. Marginal Way to industrial firms which do. Adequate warnings must be provided to motorists that, upon turning off the main road, they will encounter railroad tracks and, potentially, trains! Appropriate signs should be posted, and other precautions taken as identified by your Engineering Department. See the attached jury instructions on a recent $400,000 loss (the railroad paid another $400,000) to know what the jurors look for! :':�: Page 3 Mr. John McFarland City of Tukwila September 22, 1988 I hope my comments prove useful in the City's overall evaluation of the proposed annexation area. Again, I appreciate. Moira's extensive knowledge and patience in answering my numerous questions. I would suggest that the other three areas of proposed . annexation be viewed from the same perspective as this one to ensure that any latent hazards may be mitigated prior to, or shortly after, successful incorporation. Good luck, John! cc: Mo ra, dshawf lissoc. Planner ; Tukwil Enclosures Sincerely, Kathleen M. Johnson Risk Manager ?' :,'^k?.:,�';,:,nx; +1{i'u�: AFC IDAVIT I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby C1 Notice of Public Hearing Q Notice of Public Meeting S. Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [l Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on -J() nuo ate cL, c i/o-kg Name of Project FIRE DIST. #1 File Number 87 -1-n OF GIST( IBUTION declare that: .,,.-.«... w. r... ert• wG....... w«..w xeasncmC�rr .:lr.:ea::�ns1iF�J.^ztn ategs'h� O Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance (� Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [I Notice of Action [I Official Notice O Other El Other DISTRIBUTED AT CITY COUNCIL HEARING 9/12/88 SEPTEMBER 12, 1988 , 19 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: t:77 WHAT HAS HAPPENED September 8, 1988: King County Boundary Review Board (BRB) on September 8, 1988 approved the modified annexation boundary you were briefed on last week. (See attachment A). September 9, 1988: The decision was filed with the County Council. Staff began meeting with King County staff about costs of the annexation, e.g.,'-16th Ave. Bridge. (See attachment B). WHAT HAPPENS NEXT October 7, 1988: Deadline for King County Council to pass an ordinance setting a public hearing to establish an election date. If delayed until then, the November ballot is missed, but February can be met. City Council should decide whether _gr_ not bo stop the modifig6_annex.atign_from_groggedi.ng. Our Resolution 1079 reserved the right to withdraw the resolution depending on the BRB action. (See attachment D). September 14, 1988: Staff again meets with King County staff about the costs o+ the annexation. These meetings are important to establish some costs so the City Council can deliberate on the fiscal impacts of the annexation. ISSUES TO BE DECIDED City Council Mayor VanDusen September 12, 1983 Fire District No.1 Annexation - UPDATE 1. Whether or not to withdraw the annexation. 2. Whether or not to pass a second resolution approving the modified annexation. (Attachment C, for your convenience). 2. Whether or not to hold a public hearing to gather community input on the modified proposal. NOTE: Costs of the annexation depend upon our negotiations with the County. Those costs may or may not effect your opinion of the adviSability of the annexation. Separately from consideration of the costs, I recommend that we hold a public hearing because several Tukwila residents have inquired about this annexation. ATTACHMENTS A. BRB Resolution and Hearing Decision. ~- B. Memorandum from Tukwila Public Works Department. ~-•C. Draft Tukwila Resolution Approving the Modified Annexation Area. D. Tukwila Resolution No. 1079. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 . 24 25 26 27 28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY IN RE: CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed ) Annexation (King County Fire Dist. 1), ALL IN KING COUNTY, ) WASHINGTON FILE NO. 1450 The Notice of Intention filed in Boundary Review Board File No. 1450 proposed the annexation of certain territory by the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. After notice duly given, a hearing was held June 16, 1988, before a quorum of the Board at Foster High School. The said hearing was continued on August 9, 1988, at Foster High School. Legal notice was provided prior to the August 9th hearing for the modification `v addition of certain islands and other territory contiguous to the annexation. The :searing was continued on August 24, 1988, in Hearing Room No. 1 of the offices of the Board in Bellevue, Washington. On the basis of the testimony, evidence, and exhibits presented at said Hearing, and the matters on file in said File No. 1450. ; t is the decision of said Board that the action proposed in said Notice of Intention be, and the same is, hereby approved as modified in accordance with the mars and legal description which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Annexation History FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPOSAL RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION In reaching thin: decision, the Board has considered the many factors presc' ibed in RCW 36.93.170. Tne following have been selected for particular attention. First, it should to noted that much of the information for this decision comes from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the City. The DEIS divided the annexation area into four subareas, which will be referred to frequently in this Decision. The reader should refer to file documents if not familiar with these subareas. In 1974, the residents of Fire District No. 1 petitioned the City of Tukwila for a similar annexation. In November of 1974, the Boundary Review Board approved the proposal but deleted the industrialized portion north of the Boeing Access Road, which contained roughly 80% of the assessed valuation. The City declined to accept the modified annexation. In 1978, another petition for annexation was received, this time from the Duwamish - Allentown area. It was approved by the Board in 1980 and an appeal was filed by the Fire District. The Board's decision was upheld and the issue went to a vote of the people in April, 1983. It was rejected. PAGE ONE - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) ATTACHMENT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In 1979 the City of Seattle received a petition of registered voters seeking the annexation to the City of an area known as "South Park "; the City filed a Notice of Intention for this annexation in October, 1980. The area included most of the northern, industrialized part of the subject annexation area. The annexation was denied by the Board. Population and Territory The Notice of Intention described the population as 2,227. The DEIS describes it as follows: SUBAREA NO. 1 SUBAREA NO. 2 SUBAREA NO. 3 SUBAREA NO. 4 TOTAL; -0- 221 543 1,026 1,900 There is one single family dwelling in Subarea No. 1, owned by the Boeing Company. Subarea No. 3 is by this decision deleted, which results in a population of 1,357. This would be a 28% increase in the City's current population of 4,780. Additionally, there are approximately 20,000 employees working here, most in Subarea No. 1 (north of the Boeing Access Road.) The proportion of single family dwellings in the City would shift. The City's housing is divided into 33% single family and 67% multiple family. Following annexation, this would become 42% and 58 %, respectively, due to the higher percentage of single family dwellings within the annexation. As filed, the annexation is approximately 2.6 square miles. Acreage information was not provided by subarea, but it is estimated that as modified the annexation contains approximately 2.2 square miles. This is due to deletion of Subarea No. 3 which is approximately .4 square miles. The additions of territory are small except for the eastern half of the Duwanr.ish River. The amount of that territory t as not been calculated. According to thu City, the existing area of the City we ild be increased by approximately 44% by the addition of Alternative II, which is similar to the area as approved herein.. Comprehensive Plans and Zoning The King County Comprehensive Plan states that the County will provide urban services at a feasible level for unincorporated urban areas, but recognizes that it cannot do so at the levels generally provided by cities. The plan supports logical annexation of developed areas. Additionally, it suggests the use of Interlocal Agreements to address planning issues in potential annexation areas. King County has therefore supported the proposed annexation, but has also urged that the boundary be expanded in a northerly and westerly direction to include all unincorporated territory in the vicinity of South Park and the 16th Avenue South bridge. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as urban and assumes a mix of uses. The King County Shorelines Master Program designates most of the area along the Duwamish River as Urban Environment. The Tukwila and Renton Comprehensive Plans also apply in portions of the area. Where they overlap, the plans and policies of Tukwila do not differ significantly from those of the County. This is particularly so regarding land use classifications. Tukwila does handle some land use issues PAGE TWO - TUKWILA /F.D. /1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAGE THREE - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv./Mod. Add.) differently. For example, King County manages environmentally sensitive areas with a special ordinance and a series of map folios identifying steep slopes, unstable soils, and other high risk features. The City on the other hand relies upon the Uniform Building Code and the State Environmental Policy Act for dealing with these problems. The annexation includes a wide variety of land uses. Subarea No. 1 (being the portion north of the Boeing Access Road) is completely developed with commercial and industrial uses. It includes the Boeing Company, Kenworth Truck Company, Rhone Poulenc, Inc., Associated Grocers, and Jorgensen Steel. It includes 500 acres of industrial lands, 165 of which are within the boundaries of the King County International Airport. All of Subarea No. 1 is zoned Heavy Manufacturing (M -H). Approximately 19,000 people are employed there. Subarea No. 2 lies east of 1 -5 and is otherwise bounded by the City of Seattle. It is characterized by steep slopes and most of it is zoned RS -7200 with small portions of Neighborhood Business (BN) and some Multiple Family (RM- 1800). There are two small Light Manufacturing zones in the area. The slopes and landslide and seismic hazard designations in much of this area have kept it sparsely developed. The resulting irregular street pattern has also discouraged development. Subarea No. 3 is located generally south of South 126th Street and east of the existing Tukwila limits. (Although this decision often refers to the deletion of Subarea No. 3, it should be noted that the area deleted is only that portion lying east of the east margin of the Burlington- Northern Railroad right -of -way.) Most of this area is industrial in character, but it includes the 250 -unit Empire States Apartments and a few single family dwellings. Much of the area is in steep slopes. It includes 166 acres of industrial land. The Black River Quarry is one of the sites once considered as a possible energy resource recovery site by King County. It is referred to informally as the incinerator site. It is not now apparently under serious consideration. Zoning is predominantly RM -2400, RM -900 and M -H. Like Subarea No. 2 there are hazard areas due to unstable soils. Most of Subarea No. 3 is within the interest area of Renton as described in its Comprehensive Plan. Most of the population in Subarea No. 3 (543 people) is located in the aforementioned apartment complex. Subarea No. 4, (the Allentown- Duwamist•- Foster Point Area), is bounded by the Boeing Access Road on the north, the Duwamish River on the west, Tukwila on the south, and Interstate 5 on the east. The northern portion is predominately commercial and industrial. Metro and Boeing facilities occupy most of the southwest portion. The south half is primarily residential, including the Allentown, Duwamish and Foster Point neighborhoods. Zoning generally reflects land use in this area and includes 190 acres of M -H and M -P (Manufacturing Park) classifications. The neighborhoods are mostly zoned SR -9600. Most of Subarea 4 is a Class III Seismic Hazard Area. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan includes Allentown and designates it as low - density, single family at 0 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The industrial areas east and west of Allentown are designated Light Industrial by the City. The City's proposed land use designations reflect existing County classifications with very minor exceptions. Most of these exceptions are located in Subarea No. 3. Consequently they are not discussed herein. A majority of the land now in Tukwila is zoned Industrial or Commercial. Residential areas constitute approximately 407 acres of the City's 2,888 acres. The annexation as modified would add nearly 800 acres of residential land, most of which is single family. It would also add 700 acres of industrial lands. Most of Tukwila is substantially developed. The annexation would provide some undeveloped 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 areas, primarily in Subarea No. 2, for additional improvements. However, development in that area is limited by the steep slopes. There are opportunities for redevelopment in Subarea No. 1. Underdeveloped sites and parking lots could be converted to more intense uses. Housing units in Tukwila would increase by 446 (from 2,598 to 3,044). Little population growth is expected as a result of the annexation, other than the numbers to be added immediately. A modest upward trend in employment following redevelopment in industrial areas is expected. Services: Community Services Most community services such as Cooperative Extension, Veterans Services, Youth Work Training, Administration of Block Grant Funds, and Public Health Services, are provided by the State, County, or private agencies. Most of these services, would continue unchanged. It is estimated in the DEIS that contracts for human services and health services, etc., would increase by $9,730 for the City. Services: Library The King County Rural Library District serves unincorporated King County and many of the cities therein. It collects a tax of $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed value in the unincorporated portions of the County and in some incorporated portions of the District. (Bellevue and Bothell have annexed to the District.) Some cities provide their own library services but others, such as Tukwila, obtain service by contract. Tukwila is charged $0.12 per $1,000 in assessed value not to exceed $19.50 per capita. The effect of this limit is that the Library System will lose revenue between $163,000 and $197,000 per year as a result of annexation with no diminution of service responsibilities. This is a substantial financial impact which could reduce the District's ability to provide services. The City is urged to reconsider its arrangement with the system and to provide an analysis of the cummulative impact upon the King County Rural Library System due to continued City annexation. Services: Justice System King County provides municipal -type judici..l and justice services in the area at an estimated cost of $9.31 per capita, or approximately $12,600. This is for detention, prosecution, indigent defense, and some misdemeanor adjudications. Most of the annexation is situated in the Roxbury Municipal Court District. The City's attorney and municipal court would take over these responsibilities. It is estimated that misdemeanor caseloads would increase only 5% following annexation of the area as modified. Traffic offense caseloads could increase as much as 1004+. However, because those cases require little time, the total workload increase would be modest according to the DEIS. As a result of annexation, the City would expend an additional $32,000 for all justice services. Services: Parks The annexation contains two parks: the Allentown County Park and the Duwamish Park, which is owned by South Central School District. According to the DEIS, the City would acquire at no cost a five acre portion of Allentown Park for development as a neighborhood park. This would be necessary to meet the City's park standards. The City has indicated it would spend $460,000 in developing that five acres. PAGE FOUR - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) Services: Fire. Protection In April, 1987, King County Fire District No. 1 contracted with the City for service to the District for a period of ten years. The City hired the District employees and has, according to the contract, the right to use all District property. The 1987 assessed valuation of the District was $339.6 million dollars, resulting in tax revenues at $1.50 /$1000 of $599,000. In addition, Metro pays the District $12,000 annually in lieu of taxes for service. That payment would end following annexation. In 1987, the District paid the Citv $606,500, annualized. The Boeing Company maintains its own fire fighting force. Additionally, Boeing and Kenworth (and perhaps other large companies) contract with Seattle for backup fire protection. Tukwila provides basic life support services to the area. The assets of the District consist of fire equipment having a replacement value of $670,964; reserve funds $400,000; and a fire station located at 12026 42nd Ave., South. (The $400,000 was apparently in reserve at the time the DEIS was prepared. It is not known what that balance is today.) According to the DEIS assets of the District approximate $1,000,000. All of these assets are located in Allentown (Subarea No. 4). There are 450 to o0C calls per year in the annexation area, of which an estimated 30 to 60 originate from Subareas No. 2 and No. 3. Subarea No. 3 (having 62q') of the population of the combined Subareas 2 6r: 3), is estimated to generate from 19 to 37 calls per year. It is further estimated that the two areas generate approximately $35,000 in revenues to the District, so less than that amount is derived from Subarea No. 3. The deletion of Subarea No. 3 could create service problems, if only temporarily. Should the annexation election be successful, Subarea No. 3 will be the only surviving portion of Fire District No. 1. The City is expected to' take title to all or virtually all of the District's assets. RCW 35A.14.380 provides in part that a fire district in this situation mar, tv a vote of the people residing outside the annexed area, require the City to provide service in the balance of the District, and agree to pay the City a reasonable fee for this .service. The problem . is that with a population of only 543 (most of whom are in the apartment complex) it is doubtful that there would be sufficient resources for a viable continuation of the District. This includes not only money, but it might be difficult to find three qualified people willing to run for election and serve as commissioners. The City of Renton has indicated it will initiate annexation proceedings promptly if Subarea No. 3 is deleted. It is expected that the period following the Tukwila annexation election until annexation to Renton can be completed will be brief. Services: Police The annexation as modified includes 12.8% of the population of King County's N -2 Patrol District. There are 6,353 police calls annually in the District, and it is assumed that these are substantially attributable on a population basis, indicating approximately 800 calls per year in the annexation area. The estimated cost to King County in the annexation area is $110,200 annually on a per call basis. The County provides one and sometimes two patrols in N -2. It is unlikely that this level of service could be reduced following annexation. City response time is 2.5 minutes for Priority One (emergency) calls, and 7 to 8 minutes for non - emergency calls. King County response time is 7.4 to 9.1 minutes for Priority One calls, and 14.1 to 16.4 minutes for Priority Two. The City would PAGE FIVE - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 likely provide superior police service, but at a cost estimated in the DEIS at $243,000 annually for six patrol officers, plus $40,500 for one traffic officer. A patrol car and motorcycle would be needed, and jail and communiciation service costs would increase. Total cost to the City is estimated at $313,500. Little or no cost savings would be expected to accrue to the County. Services: Water There are five water purveyors in the annexation as proposed. The City of Seattle serves the area north of the alignment of South 112th • Street and west of East Marginal Way, South. Water District No. 25 serves in the Allentown Area, and Water District No. 125 covers the area west of the Duwamish River and the small area on the east side of the Beacon Coal Mine Road. The Creston Water Assoc. serves a small area within Subarea No. 2. Seattle also provides service along the west side of Empire Way South and the City of Tukwila serves a home and several businesses in Subarea No. 3. Most of the study area south of the Boeing Access Road, is within the Skyway Coordinated Water Supply Plan Boundary. The Plan was developed to simplify the varied water purveyor boundaries and resolve the resulting problems. These purveyors receive water from the Seattle system. They serve varying pressure gradients requiring pump stations and pressure reducing valves. There are distribution mains in all developed portions of the annexation. Subarea No. 3 is largely undeveloped and unserved. District No. 25, serving in the Allentown portion of Subarea No. 2, has facilities which are outdated and inadequate. To bring them up to standard, a new 8 inch main and three fire hydrants would be needed. The Skyway Plan recommends that future service to this area be provided by Seattle. Tukwila states in the FEIS that the City would take responsibility for most of the Districts' service area. (A small part is served by Water District No. 125.) The City does not intend to upgrade the system unless there is a health hazard or property owners request an upgrade and, presumably, would be willing to pay for it. The Creston Water Association serves 15 homes in the northern portion of Subarea No. 2 using a 2" main parallel to an existing 8" Seattle line. The Skyway Plan again recommends service to this area by Seattle, which provides service in the area surrounding the Association. The remaining existing water systems are adequate to serve current and planned uses. Most of the improvements that could be required involve retrofitting existing systems to make appropriate connections to the Tukwila system, should the City elect to serve all or portions of the annexed area. Following annexation, Tukwila could proceed under the statutes to take over these service areas. Subarea No. 3 is within Renton's Comprehensive Water Plan and it has been reported that service in that area by Tukwila would be unduly expensive because of the required crossing of the railroad. Services: Sewerage Sewer service in the annexation is provided by Seattle, Val Vue Sewer District, Skyway Sewer District, and the City of Renton. Some areas are still relying upon septic tanks. Seattle serves most of Subarea No. 1 and Subarea No. 2, and additional areas between Empire Way and the Burlington- Northern Railroad. Val Vue serves two areas: one west and southwest of the Boeing Access Road and the other lying west of Interurban Avenue, South. Skyway serves a small area in Subarea No. 3 as does the City of Renton. Most of Subarea No. 3 is without sewer service, as is PAGE SIX - TUKWILA /P.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the Allentown area. The portions of the annexation area which are served are generally receiving adequate service. S:•:eral homes along 49th Ave., So. have access to sewers but have never connected. Connection could be required if a health problem develops. Most of Empire Way, So. is not currently served. Septic tanks are in use in that area and some problems exist. Subarea No. 3 is generally within Renton's Comprehensive Sewer Plan and it is expected that Renton will initiate annexation proceedings in the near future. Sewers would thereby be made available following application and creation of a Local Improvement District by the property owners. The Allentown area has the most significant sewage disposal problems. The industrial areas in Allentown have sewers provided by Seattle, Tukwila and Val Vue, but the homes rely upon septic systems and there have been a number of reported overflows. The County will not now allow septic systems on lots smaller than 12,500 square feet, and many of the lots in the Allentown area are much smaller. It is in a low -lying area close to the river which has a high water table. Sewers are reportedly needed in the Allentown residential area. Following annexation, a system could be installed (presumably at property owners' expense) under the City's jurisdiction. The City has indicated it does not plan a system there unless the citizens request it or unless there is a health hazard identified by the Seattle -King County Health Department. A sewer system in the Allentown area would cost an estimated $1,180,000. Following annexation, Tukwila could contract with Seattle to continue providing service and simply allow Val Vue and Skyway to continue to serve in their respective areas. Additionally, Tukwila could assume all or part of those areas in accordance with state statutes. Tukwila would have responsibility for sewerage in the areas which are currently not served. Financial Effects: Tukwila The assessed valuation of the entire annexation area would be approximately $469 million. This includes $375 million from Subarea No. 1, $8 million from Subarea No. 2, $70 million from Subarea 4 and $15 million from Subarea No. 3. As modified, the annexation includes slightly in excess of $453 million in assessed value. This is nearly $334,000 per capita, which is in the range of ten times th.: County average. Surprisingly, there is not a substantial excess of revenues over required expenditures. The City reports that operation and maintenance for the General Fund and Street Fund would be $1,510,000; annual revenues would range from $1,945,000 to $2,157,000, resulting in net revenues that would range from $434,500 to $647,000 annually. However, the City estimates that approximately $12,920,000 in capital costs will be required in the annexation area, of which $4,760,000 would be incurred within the first five years. If that $4,760,000 was financed by twenty -year 7.50% municipal bonds, the annual debt service would be $460,000, wiping out the net revenue for the low -end estimate. That provides no funds for the remaining $8,160,000 in required capital costs, nor does it allow any funding for the 16th Ave. South Bridge. According to the City, taxes paid by homeowners for general municipal services (road district, library district, fire district, etc.) would drop from $3.54 per $1,000 assessed valuation to $2.88. This would create a annual savings of $33 on a $50,000 home. The total tax burden for the area annexed would be reduced by approximately $300,000 annually. More than half of that reduction would be incurred by the Library District. Total 1987 property taxes within the City of Tukwila were $11.97 per $1,000. The rate within Fire District No. 1 ranged from $12.39 to $12.63 per $1,000. The PAGE SEVEN - TUKWILA /P.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City's legal capacity for bonded indebtedness is now $22 million and will be increased to $30 million as a result of the annexation. Financial Effects: King County It is estimated that annual savings accruing to the County as a result of annexation could be approximately $725,000: Revenues Lost Current Expense Revenues $ 729,500 Road District Revenues 685,000 Total Revenues Lost: ($1,414,500) Savings Incurred C.I.P. Annual Average Debt Service - Bridge (50%) Current Expense Fund Savings Road District Savings Tota 1 Savings Incurred Net Annual Savings. $ 725,500 Current Expense savings would be incurred primarily on police staffing for traffic enforcement, plus some in parks maintenance. Debt service on the bridge is based upon the assumption that replacement would cost $30 million financed by 20 -year 7.5% bonds and that King County would pay one -half of the annual debt service. The.$567,000 is based upon the $3.4 million now budgeted in the Six Year Capital Improvement Program. If the annexation does not take place, cost to the County will be much higher, assuming the full cost of the bridge would be borne by the County: Annual Revenues Current Expense Revenue $ 729,500 Road District Revenues 685,000 Tota 1 Revenues Annual Expenditures CIP Annual Average Debt Service - Bridge (100%) C.E. Expenditures Road District Expenses Total Expenditures Net Annual (loss) 567,000 1,450,000 44,000 79,000 567,000 2,900,000 44,000 79,000 This estimate includes only Current Expense and Road District expenditures directly attributable to the area. if services such as assessments, planning, and other administrative activities were added the amounts would be higher. 16th Avenue South Bridge The bridge is an unusual bascule -type, constructed so that the leaves retract while being raised. It is 58 years old and has a cracked footing under one of the PAGE EIGHT - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Clod. ,Add.) $2,140,000 $ 1,414,500 $ 3,590,000 ($ 2,175,500) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 . 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAGE NINE - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) piers. The piling supporting one end of the bridge is reportedly inadequate and one pier shifts slightly as a result of earthquakes, such as occurred in 1964. This causes the leaves to become misaligned. Adjustments are necessary, but the maximum extent of such adjustments is limited. The bridge could fail due to a substantial earthquake. Because of its age and the requirement that it be manned by a tender, annual cost for maintenance and operation has been estimated to be as high as $500,000. The cost to replace the bridge has been estimated at $30,000,000 for a similar new operating structure. It is evident from the maps that the bridge carries traffic which originates in the City of Seattle, Tukwila and unincorporated areas. It is likely that some significant percentage is generated by the Boeing Company and other industrial installations in the annexation area. Both the County and the City acknowledge that the bridge is properly a regional facility and its responsibility should be shared by several agencies, perhaps even including the Port of Seattle due to the apparent need for an operating structure to accommodate the waterway. An attempt was made by King County and Tukwila to negotiate an agreement for sharing responsibility for this bridge. It is not surprising that the attempt was unsuccessful. First, there is insufficient information to support an agreement. The cost of the bridge cannot be determined because the nature of the structure required is unknown. The Coast Guard determines the height clearance above the waterway. It is possible that a fixed bridge could be installed. The cost of a fixedbridge (according to testimony) would be substantially less than $30 million. If a fixed bridge were permitted, (and assuming that both its cost and operation would be far less than current costs), it might be wise to replace this bridge prior to failure. The money now being spent for maintenance and operation, if applied to 20 -year, 7.5% municipal bonds, would amortize costs of $5,000,000. Furthermore, the indirect costs born by commuters and others resulting from unexpected failure of the bridge could be extraordinary. In any case, an agreement between the responsible parties will require considerably more information. Secondly, it will be necessary to involve all of the responsible parties. It is unfair to expect that the County and Tukwila will bear the total cost of the bridge. Much of the traffic the bridge carries is clearly to and from the City of Seattle. Seattle now has no motive to share in the cost of the bridge. However, contemplation of the results of failure might change the City's attitude. The advantage to participating in a planned replacement rather than an emergency replacement could be great. The debt service on a $30 million replacement structure (at 7.5% over 20 -years amortized) would be $2.9 million annually. BOUNDARY MODIFICATIONS Boundary modifications herein enacted are addressed in three categories. First is the deletion of territory in Subarea No. 3 as requested by Renton. The second is the addition of territory in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge. The third is a collection of small additions, deletions and clarifications to correct tax lot splits, islands, and similar problems which resulted from the use of the Fire District No. 1 corporate boundary. A number of maps have been attached to this annexation to illustrate the changes. They are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by the following references. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Subarea No. 3 Deletion The Draft Environmental Impact Statement describes alternatives I, IA and II. This decision most closely. approximates Alternative II, but includes all lands northeast of the river, while deleting Subarea 3. It differs from Alternative 11 by including the area east of I -5 in the vicinity of the Boeing Access Road and 49th Ave., South. According to the DEIS, deletion of Subarea 3 would be consistent with the logical extension of the City of Renton as recognized by the Renton - Tukwila boundary adjustment agreement. The Board has examined that document and concurs. The common boundary in this area can, and should be, a continuation of the east right -of -way line of the Burlington- Northern railroad. Statements by Renton indicate that annexation by that City is probable and desirable. The Board herein encourages Renton to pursue annexation as quickly as possible due to the fire protection issue previously described. Both cities acknowledge that Renton is the logical provider of sewer service in Subarea 3. Renton currently serves the 250 apt. Empire Estates Complex on Empire Way, So. The Skyway Critical Water Supply Study and the FEIS indicate that water service by Renton would be appropriate. Tukwila has indicated that it can best provide fire protection and will do so by contract if requested by Renton. Utility service by Tukwila in this area would be difficult because of the substantial cost incurred for crossing the railroad. Most of Subarea No. 3 is in Renton's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Sewerage Plan. The majority of Subarea No. 3 is physically removed from Tukwila and oriented to Renton due to the physical boundary created by the railroad. Also, steep slopes both physically and visually separate the area from Tukwila. The mayors of the two cities have agreed by memorandum to support an interlocal agreement which would, among other things, establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting deletion of Subarea No. 3. The legal description attached to this decision deletes that portion of Subarea No. 3 lying east of the right- of -wal line of the Burlington- Northern Railroad and south of the converging right -of -way lines of Empire Way South and Interstate 5. 16th Avenue South Bridge Addition The annexation as submitted would have created an isolated service island of unincorporated King County surrounded by Seattle and Tukwila, and divided by the river. This area is generally described as lying north of the extension of South Director Street. Maintenance, operation and policing of the abbreviated road system there would have remained a County responsibility, necessitating access through two cities. Tukwila, in its FEIS, states that the Duwamish River constitutes a natural boundary for the northern portion of the annexation and, further, that it would not be logical to extend annexation to the area west of the river. The City lists four options for dealing with the island created: A. Tukwila could annex only the area east of the Duwamish and north to the City limits of Seattle. As proposed by the City, the bridge should be left within one jurisdiction only. B. The boundaries of the annexation area could be extended to also include PAGE TEN - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the unincorporated land west of the Duwamish. This option would ignore the natural boundary provided by the river and would create an awkward division of jurisdiction between Seattle and Tukwila, with Tukwila having jurisdiction of a small area west of the river and having access only via 16th Avenue South. C. The northwestern boundary could be established just south of 16th Avenue South between the river and Seattle's city limits. This would also leave an island, but simply a smaller one. Additionally, the bridge would remain entirely the responsibility of King County. D. The boundaries could remain essentially unchanged from those provided in the legal description. The boundary as filed would establish Tukwila's corporate limits generally along the east bank of the Duwamish River. The Surface Water Management Division of King County Department of Public Works takes the position that it is essential that the area annexed include the entire riverbank area to provide for proper bank stabilization and maintenance in one jurisdiction. The Division claims that the entire river in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge should be annexed by one jurisdiction in order to provide for adequate maintenance and operation of the bridge. The Board agrees as to the centerline of the river. Furthermore, testimony indicates that state law provides that city jurisdiction is interpreted as extending to the centerline of the river. However, the argument in favor of one entity having jurisdiction over the bridge must be balanced with the need for financial equity and other considerations. The Division argues on Page 49 of the FEIS that all flood protection, bank stabilization, and river - related maintenance activities in the affected areas should become the responsibility of Tukwila. The Board concurs and assumes that establishment of the boundary at the centerline or thread of the river will accomplish that objective. The Board agrees that the annexation boundary should be extended southerly and westerly to the thread of the Tuwamish River, and that the annexation should be further modified by extension northerly to include all unincorporated lands lying east of the thread of the river and north of the annexation boundaries as presented. This modification will have several effects. First, it will substantially eliminate an impractical and illogical service area for King County. The island is not totally eradicated, leaving a small portion of South Park surrounded by the river and the City of Seattle. In our opinion, this area is part of the Seattle community and logical service area. Annexation to Tukwila would be impractical. Although testimony indicated that annexation of this area by Seattle is not likely in the near term, the Board is hopeful that it will someday be accomplished. Placing the bridge within two jurisdictions will create some management and operation difficulties which will require the cooperation of the City and the Countv to resolve. King County has operated this bridge for many years and has the skilled and experienced personnel to continue to do so. It is strongly recommended that the County continue in this role and that the City and the County formalize the arrangement and share the operation and maintenance costs on an equal basis. As previously discussed, it is premature to expect an agreement among all of the appropriate agencies and parties as to the long -term solution to the bridge. As an interim measure, the Board has two objectives. One is to avoid, as much as PAGE ELEVEN - TUKWILA /P.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 possible, a serious economic inequity. The other is to maintain or create a situation most conducive to future negotiation and agreement. It is the opinion of the Board that annexing all of the territory except the bridge would place an inappropriate burden upon the County. The opposite is also true. Foisting total responsibility upon Tukwila for an acknowledged regional facility would be inequitable, even with the substantial amount of assessed valuation to be obtained by Tukwila. As can be seen in the fiscal analysis, . the City will probably have a negative cash flow as a result of the annexation even without the added cost of replacement of the bridge. Should Tukwila be saddled with even as much as one -half of the debt service necessary to pay for a $30 million replacement, the negative fiscal effects on the City would be substantial and would require contributions well in excess in revenues stemming from the annexation. Under the existing situation the only governmental entity which has real motivation to solve the bridge problem is King County. Following annexation, both the County and the City will necessarily be involved, and it is hoped that a multiagency sharing of the responsibility might result. Islands and Tax Lot Splits I. North Boeing Building: This large building is situated on the west side of East Marginal Way South, and is already divided by the Seattle corporate limits and the old Fire District No. 1 boundary. There is no way to eliminate a tax lot division but it is possible to avoid an additional boundary passing through the property. Expansion of the boundary northerly to the Seattle limits (see discussion of 16th Avenue South Bridge Addition, Page Ten) will place approximately ninety percent of this building in Tukwila. It is hoped that Tukwila and Seattle might accomplish a boundary adjustment to delete the balance of this property from Seattle and annex it to Tukwila. (See Exhibit B.) II. Associated Grocers: This property is located along the west side of Martin Luther King Way So. (Empire Way So.) just north of the Boeing Access Road. It is partially in the City of Seattle. Again, it is not possible to avoid a tax lot split but it is hoped that a boundary adjustment between the two cities can be accomplished. This decision does not amend the boundary as filed. (See Exhibit C.) M. 51st Avenue South: The City of Seattle corporate boundary divides several tax lots and follows the centerline of 51st Avenue South in this vicinity. This creates two problems. First, a state statute prohibits the use of street centerlines as boundaries and the boundary used in this annexation is therefore reduced to the internal margin of the street. This decision deletes from the Tukwila annexation the balance of the divided lots. The evidence indicates that the houses on those lots are within the City of Seattle, while small, undeveloped portions of the lots are currently unincorporated. Future annexation of these small parcels by the City of Seattle is encouraged. (See Exhibit D.) IV. 56th Place South: The Fire District No. 1 boundary divides approximately five lots. Portions are within PAGE TWELVE - TUKWILA /P.D. #1(Apv. /Mod.Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 E.) the annexation, and portions would remain unincorporated. Deletion of the area lying east of Martin Luther King Wav South (Empire Way South) in this vicinity will avoid the division of tax lots and establish a physical, logical boundary. (See Exhibit V. Rainier National Bank: This property is located between East Marginal Way South and Interurban Avenue South. The property would be divided by the annexation. According to testimony, the bank would prefer to be annexed. The balance of the bank property is contained in the aforementioned Riverton Annexation. Because that annexation has already been filed, no change is made by this decision. (See Exhibit F.) VI. Island of Lots 7, 8, & 9, Block 22, Hillman Gardens: This island is totally surrounded by the annexation. , It is added to the annexation. (See Exhibit G.) VII. Island at Airport Way: Railroad right- of -wav, Interstate 5 right -of -way and Airport Way South right -of -way would become an island : etween Seattle and Tukwila. It is the decision of the Board that this island be allowed in preference to creating an illogical service area, which would result from a small portion of Airport Way being located in Tukwila with the balance in Seattle. It is hoped that the City of Seattle will annex the area. (See Exhibit H.) VIII. Island at 9120 East Marginal Way South: This island is totaliv surrounded by the annexation and is added by this decision. (See Exhibit I.) IX. 42nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South: Small portions of both streets at their intersection w 3uld be left out of the City of Tukwila whereas the remaining portions of the street in this vicinity would be within the City. This would create an irregular boundary and illogical service area. Consequei tly, this area is added to the annexation. (See Exhibit J.) OBJECTIVES This decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County tends to accomplish the pertinent objectives specified in RCW 36.93.180. The particularly significant objectives in this proposal are as follows: 1) Preservation of Natural Neighborhoods and Communities: This approval will permit the voters of the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods to determine if they wish to join the City of Tukwila. If they do so they will carry with them sufficient assessed valuation to enable the City to provide needed services and capital improvements. A number of municipal services would be improved or made available, including police protection, parks, and sanitary sewers. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(1). 2) Use of Physical Boundaries: The annexation makes extensive use of the PAGE THIRTEEN - TUKWILA /F.D. #l(Apv. /Hod.Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Duwamish River and Martin Luther King Way South (Empire Way South), 51st Avenue South, and other streets. This decision tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(2). 3) Creation and Preservation of Logical Service Areas: The annexation as modified restores to the City of Renton territory which properly should be served by that City in accordance with previous agreements and comprehensive plans. Tukwila is capable of providing municipal services, particularly police protection, at appropriate levels in the balance of the area. The City may or may not opt to assume responsibility for utility services where it has an opportunity to do so. Should the City decide to pursue that option, the question would in most circumstances come before the Boundary Review Board. Consequently, it is not addressed in detail in this resolution. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the pertinent objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(3). 4) Prevention of Abnormally Irregular Boundaries: The Board has attempted to balance the need for regular boundaries with the desire to avoid creating uneconomical islands between Tukwila and Seattle and other boundary irregularities. Also, the western boundary is amended to follow the thread of the Duwamish River. While the river is not regular in all senses of the word, it is certainly a recognizable boundary. The balance of the western boundary will likely be expanded westward by future annexations which will eliminate any minor irregularities created in this action. The addition of territory in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue bridge will eliminate a boundary irregularity which would create service difficulties as well as a fiscal inequity. The deletion of Subarea No. 3 not only is consistent with previous agreements and adopted comprehensive plans, but will further establish a regular and recognizable boundary between Renton and Tukwila. Under ideal circumstances, the Boundary Review Board might select to place all territory east of I -5 in the City of Seattle. However, to delete that area in its entirety from this annexation would create a major service problem for King County with no assurance that it would be resolved in the future. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(4). 5) Adjustment of Impractical Boundaries: The Board has'implemented a number of adjustments to the proposed boundary. The use of the corporate limits of King County Fire Protection District No. 1, which predated the freeway and other improvements, created a number of problems. To the extent of its authority, the Board has modified the boundary to ameliorate these problems. The logic of the adjustments should be self- evident upon examination of the maps and comments contained elsewhere in this decision. The same is true in the area of the territorial addition in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(5). 6) Annexation to Cities of Unincorporated Areas which are Urban in Character: Established land uses, zoning, governmental infrastructure and all pertinent comprehensive plans indicate plainly that this area is urban in character. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objectives specified in RCW 36.93.180(8). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY THAT, for the above reasons, the action proposed in the Notice of Intention contained in said File No. 1450 be, and the same is, hereby approved as modified by the addition and deletion of territory PAGE FOURTEEN - TUKWILA /P.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 as evidenced by the legal description which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. ADOPTED BY SAID BOARD by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 against this 8th day of September, 1988, and signed by me in authentication of its said adoption on said date. FILED by me this , 4 day of September, 1988 • 411111, G.B - C' ' , Executive Secretary 0 WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY GUNBJOR SA IDVIK, Chair PAGE FIFTEEN - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) FILE NO. 145C •"TUKWILA /F.D. #1 EXHIBIT A Page Sixteen August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88 «< LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION (Fire District 01 Revised) BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 °17'40" E 868.00 feet more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3, -00.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit Line and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the Seattle City Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way south); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (also known as 5. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA/F.D. #1 Page Sevente legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>REV. 9 7 Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet, more or less to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the North line cf the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue S.; Thence South along said margin to the centerline of South 112th Street, being on the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or lass, to an intersection with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street and Seattle City Limit Line to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Southerly on the West side of said lot and Seattle City Limit Line to the North line of South 114th Street, sometimes called August Street, as platted in said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approxi 4'ao Fc4 c€ o4Ljgsf' z i re a4 E.++p aJ•y S o w +k (St a.�e 1 'i z); mately Page Eightee!L FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 11 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88 «< Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its interse( - E4sn Rt11 { .ear' - Ida/ like, o.' Sft -S �el t1. Norti..leaetil Cor ►.�. tion with the "1 l OI g ZOC o 195 sa.idl Li.)c r Le :, sQ - S); Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersec- tion with the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line of State Road 5 to an intersection with the Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Pacific Coast Railroad); Thence South long said Northeasterly Right - of - Way Line to an intersection with the North line of the Southeast - :/4 of said Section 14; Thence continuing along said Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersection with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101, said line being also the existing Tukwila are ro u,,,..d. t 310 4 a.LT S. 124 54reet (cs m tasu Old ale.., sa 'ill . Fasf -3- FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA/F.D. #1 Page Ninetee' , Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 11 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88«< -4- City Limit Lint; Thence Westerly along said extension and Tukwila City Limit Line to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said line being also the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Line 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread. of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, pap 79, in King County, Washir;ton and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in FILE NO. 145 O- =UKWILA /F.D. #1 Page Twenty Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88 «< -5- Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thence! Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Northwesterly along said City Limit Line of Tukwila tc: the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly exten- sion of the South line of Tract 22, of Riverside Interurban Tracts; as recorded in Vol. 10, page 74 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence West along said South line and extension to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Vol. 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as WP:(ES)P5 FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA'F.D. #1 Page Twenty -5 -6- Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88 «< recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; '• -.:..∎ ;n .;3 n;C; -•,� •f 7G(` Thence Westerly along said South line to the.West line of „Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence. Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and'waterway, to the North line of Section 32, Township 2.4, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. L /M /7 t tor 1: ". .% autr.• ;: L ri xation boundary r• A CZ1 q71 cra as t sa � z 0 to 0 C Rft U S 0 ti • o o '\f • 7. I.44 AC. ❑ EASEMENT ro CITY OF SEATTLE AURELIO OESIMONE 7L.6/ PILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit C Page Twenty -Three M6v 7os. 14AAPV4 8 HAAPLA 7.1. Jd /4 J 3 o.C 72. 4 5 /346 .. 6AC. Fire ' istrict #1 Boundary JO-ssar • N° " r L ,ZZ IV _- • _ - a/ 1 • -1 v • s • • y FILE NO. 145 0- TUK WILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit D Page Twenty -Four 1 • 3-4 • -•_. 5%6: 110 ire 1 .. 12 1 11 tO - t' 91/11 bt- - - - -- i - — I? r d id ; I • i I I I '1301 2 • FILE NO. 1450- 'TUKNIT.A /F.D. #1 Exhibit E m G, A Page Twenty -Five f'i , O. i 84 •! j 187 I 0� \ 0 ..0 A / C • e • try v 1 .�1 1, 135. ' z4‘: 1 O , J:.! it )/ rti //9 .,/ .v •a �1 t� es /iT ,„,,,,t 7. I g _ I 1_ \ 1; ,01 a • se 1 2 . ,i 15 20 11 ;�, �I � , II% ...... ° ; plan ;a t.- 10 `+' � rr� \t x 1 \1 X 11$ W �� ;i _ � I185A p �V 4 12.0 _ I1 "' .0 7 `�'� 14 — 11 '0118 - - � — ,00 !sue 9 ^\` t 9 7 11 ' 98 1 99 Y . V 1 1 ,1 II I! 1 'eV. LINE t\ I ACE 1 .101c Ac 01 ■ 1" 1 vt S.P. 791-124 (0) (C 1 0 r a � -- •332 ` t 2 ■ PIM ooccS7;c= sa EN*, 1e I . [:N — .l 50 1 ft. 1ot. .7o SO " 14< '7051 RAVERSO :3Ac. Ii •o NORTH NE OF C. C. LEW/S l3OA'AT/ON CLAIM J7 1�.�..�., -_ 4Q4 A (00 rn C1 A 1l A F11.3 NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit F Page Twenty -Six SO 17; "14 'el 1 2 1 1 3 15 16117 i' t9 120 21 :2 b In - , 1 1 6 0 .1 l i 7' 1 `r' � I 4123 ' 7-i------- ' 1 $ 11 '" j a ! .tit5 M rimillA r sT) 4 S /2; TH y � T k I. , :. - , I -. ate . �- ac 2 1 W 1 �m "" S � 1 r o 4 .1 40 32 S '1STN ST• — 711111 -- IO • / ATM iw S C,fRKSNolE ST) •^ r- 2® A A - -i 50 , It 2 1 .4 D 1 1• ' r JO 1 '00 SO 1 J f 4 /As? CIO I . t 7 4, s °�2 i,A, s. �' j .11 1/4 T NOTV� 361.15443332'31 10I2! 26 e— �l;IZ 3 114 113 116.1721 r. • re1(.142 N ,) - 1 War )5W o NIGHT O f $00 7S •.6 "RUCK PARTS !.E9 Ac /VCR 1 2.7 • • 0.3 a 24.70 Acres LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 41 139t(37363s 4 r (.. J 115TH o A I \� NO? - (:w't 1 ni 7 N 4 'O ' 31 1 36 1 37 36 3513423132: 3113C2913 27126111 1415i(6if/78 920'21 g 8 _ / •, 1112 ace _l _:= =fT-- T. - - � • - -- fl 3• 5 re (61 (t1 �S► S77129 1 ) V 11 Z3, — ; 1:S r — 'T " 2J0.J � I ® i ` I � II O7 II - -. �'" u 5 FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit G Page Twenty -Seven - (DI q�. .7 J f C fT) LOGS •Pue•tme I r —a. cr Ifte ■ °#1 ti* • P-Re■ 000 000 .11°.111.1 r eso" 01 C.3 4 1u° ( I0t/N0 tIlt to • ^ -v.r 9100 A.AWAI ••e Tit 6 111Au10 AAA. •i7tl 0 1441 191 STONI 11 I411310N fN1 IWl0/MGf CLNDJdNt0 i VI a 16.53 Al ;ACT 4 ,fte roc SO. LN. L.N. J O • ti 0 'A r T R . Z.* Q GV •P ic y 1 -----J 9 ' � C I1n0A1.* .A •A r V . v! •A /. T 2 ACT 2 A 7 C O M PAN Y 3 . A C T-«-�- • I .•. •. R E' S 4SSELr 0 L_C. N0. 50 eNAT7 D L. C. N0.38 rA :4! N0. 38 s .o• - =� - - -�+-_ -111 55:.. t\s tTn n , �- _ip. I.-.4.4144: .-7":7!:muir 414:475.7pzedW414114 41/2-41:: i FILE NO. 1450- TUK WILA /F.D. #1 ,,l'- Exhibit I /2 Page Twenty -Nine • I N I ORTIO OF TRACT 6, T .,. is .... �1 i� - 1111 i�iiil 11 en1e I1��r1en t .s. � I 1 tel: p V s1 � �: - _ l � � � � � � 1 1 1 1 1 X 1 1 rI e � I LI.1.11 op - I I i� �_ I 111111 i�i1 �i iii1� 1.1.1:1. I I I I 1.1.1.11.1.1.1.1.1.1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 N 6 C TA. 1 • .L o �� \ r TR■ • POP 1/ G O _ r +, -.ow we. Y TltIMLA WI Lbw •N t� •Sett l 4) r. i... 1 �11 � �/ . 4' 7 ..� 1 r i , . i • :1• .. . * 1 • t.1 • (• 1 17 0 11 N r. rtl cra O 311 6b 40 46 b tt a ••• O b IZZ b 7 _ 2" /-- 511- ". Iv 0 4 70 1 99 -iZ_ City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433.1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: John McFarland, City Administrator FROM: Ross Earnst, Director of Public Works DATE: September 7, 1988 SUBJECT: Fire District #1 Annexation Meeting We met with Rex Knight and Doug Mattoon of King County Public Works on September 6 to discuss public works annexation items. This memo describes the items discussed. 16TH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE Rex explained that their budget proposal from Administration to the Council will include: $250,000 - For maintenance and operation (shared 50/50) $150,000 - For cleaning and painting (100% County) $150,000 - For soil boring at the north pier (100% County) - -- - 50/50 share on ensueing costs The County is pursuing federal bridge funds for the bridge and would expect any local matching funds to be equally shared. INTERURBAN AVENUE BRIDGE This 3.5 million dollar project is under construction with completion expected in the summer of 1989. All funding is in place and none to be asked from Tukwila. EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH (112th Street to Boeing Access Road) The County has budgeted $700,000 of "local" funds for this project. The project has PS &E completed. It was explained that the Council pulled similar funding on an arterial that Kirkland annexed. Costs for undergrounding power could raise the cost by $250,000 or more. Access agreements on the west side are going to require extensive work. The County is in the right -of -way phase and to date have been unsuccessful. They will turn this over to use if not completed by annexation. ATTACHMENT B John McFarland Memorandum September 7, 1988 Page 2 Surface water interlocal agreements were briefly addressed as were the fourteen traffic signals. Doug. Mattoon will get with a breakdown of the $250,000 M &O costs and that will be forwarded to you. RC /kjr CC: Mayor Rick Beeler and 3553C4 WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA RESOLUTION NO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A MODIFIED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1036, previously expressed support for the proposed annexation and expressed an intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the City Council, in Resolution 1079, passed July 5, 1988, reconfirmed approval of annexation of the area known as Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area subject to final determination of the boundary by the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board has now determined and approved a modified boundary for the annexation area which decision will be signed in written form on September 8, 1988; WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the matter placed on the ballot for the November 8, 1988, election, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board which area is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and legally on Exhibit B attached hereto both of which exhibits are incorporated herein, and requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held on November 8, 1988, within the proposed annexation area, on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall upon annexation become subject to said zoning and land use regulations. Page 1 ATTACHMENT C ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE 5 DAY OF ' , 1988. CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FI • WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: /L 3553C3 MOW C UNCIL PRESIDENT, MABEL J. HARRIS tOZN ‘ , 1 ► III1 1141 ilid Now 11 I � i ' l l�� ll „„,, 11,1111114p, 111111 ,, ` Ilfllllll� "�IL:,,,I I� 1 11u �,� „1,1 ,,,, IIN;;illll;i��ll I I FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Modified FIRE DISTRICT #1 Annexation Boundary Proposed Firs District # 1 Boundary INO 111•1•11111•11111•••••=111111111114.01610.&11.1 CCA ise W 1 G. GOLDMaTM • ASSOC.,NC. STALES& & ASSOOIATES TDA NC. NORTH FIGURE WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO / Cr 7 l CITY OF TUKWILA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE PROPOSED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council has in Resolution 1036 previously expressed its support for the proposed annexation and expressed its intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council has caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board currently has the matter under consideration, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the matter placed on the ballot for the November 8, 1988, election, and to accomplish that this resolution must be passed before a final determination has been made by the King County Boundary Review Board, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area and further described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein, and requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held on November 8, 1988, within the proposed annexation area, on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila, subject to the right to withdraw said resolution depending upon the final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council has previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall upon annexation become subject to said zoning and land use regulations. 3553C3 Page 1 ATTACHMENT D Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: 3553C4 COUNCIL PRESIDENT, MABEL J. HARRIS Page 2 24 August 1988 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION [REVISED] BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North. Range 4 East. W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33. Township 24 North. Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Whence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 17'40" E 868.00 feet more or less. to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed. which is also the Seattle City Limit Line. a distance of approximately 3.400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33. Township 24 North. Range 4 East. W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit Line and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. W.M. to the Southeast corner of the Northeast quarter of said Section 4; Thence East along the North line of the South half of Section 3, Township 23 North. Range 4 East, W.M. to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); Thence South along said Easterly boundary 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (Also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3. Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County. Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision 940.00 feet, more or less. to the North line of said subdivision. also known as the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line to the Westerly margin of 51st Avenue South; Thence South along said Westerly margin of 51st Avenue South to the centerline of South 112th Street, being the Northeast corner of Section 10, Township 23 North. Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along the East line of said Section 10. to an intersection with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street, which is a point on the East line of said Section 10. distant 452.30 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Section; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151. Block 16. C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats. page 82. Records of King County. Washington; Thence Southerly' on the West side of said lot to the North line of South 114th Street, sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted in said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line to the present city limits on the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2.626.29 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the Southerly margin of 4 )Juniper Street. also known as South 120th Street; Thence East approximately 1.100.00 feet to the Northerly production of the centerline of Block 3. Allentown Acres► as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats. Page 22. Records of King County, WA; Thence S 0 ° 23'00" W. 92.11 feet along the centerline of said Block 3 to the Northwest co of Lot 14. of said Block 3; Thence S 89 E along the North line of said Lot 14 a distance of 93.03 feet; Thence S 49 ° 17'20" W to the Southwesterly margin of 56th Place S.; Thence southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of said Allentown Acres with the centerline of State Road No. 2 (Empire Way South); Thence S 40 42'30" E along said centerline a distance of 818.62 feet; Thence S 49 ° 1 7 '3 . 0" E to said Southwesterly margin of 56th Place S. and point "B" and thR END OF DESCRIPTION: Thence S 49 17'30" W a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 40 ° 42'30" E a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 49 ° 17'30" W to an intersection with the Southwesterly margin of said State Road No. 2; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to the intersection of the North and South centerline of Section 13► Township 23 North. Range 4 East. W.M.; Thence South along said North and South centerline to the South line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; Thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line to the centerline of 68th Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8. Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); Thence Northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road. County Road No. 8 and Monster Road). as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats. Page 75. Records of King County. WA; Thence Northwesterly along said road centerline 250.00 feet, more or less. to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th Street). as platted in C.D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts. as Recorded in Volume 11 of Plats. Page 24. Records of King County. WA; Thence Westerly along said extension to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825► Page 545► Volume 821. Page 263 of deeds. Records of King County. WA; Page 2 of 4 feet; 1H:8709241 Pap 2 of 4 7 Thence Southerly on the West side of said lot to the North line of South 114 Street, sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted In said addition; Thence Easterly along said North . line to the present city limits on the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the centerline of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East approximately 1,100.00 feet to the Northerly production of the centerline of Block 3, Allentown Acres, as recorded In Volume 13 of Plats, Page 22, Records of King County; Thence Southerly along said Northerly production and said centerline of said Block 3 to the Northwest corner of Lot 14, of said Block 3; Thence S 89'37'00" E along the North line of said Lot 14 a distance of 93.03 Thence S 49'17'20" W to the Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S.; Thence Southeasterly along' said Southwesterly margin to point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of said Allentown Acres with the centerline of State Road No. 2 (Empire Way S.); Thence S 40'42'30" E along said centerline a distance of 818.62 feet; Thence N 49'17'30" E to said Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S. and point "B' and the ENO OF DESCRIPTION: Thence S 49'17'30" W a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 40'42'30" E a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 49'17'30" W to an intersection with the Southwesterly margin of said State Road No. 2; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to the intersection of the North and South centerline of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence South along said North and South centerline to the South line of South 1401 Street; Thence Westerly and Southwesterly along the Southerly line of South 140th Street, also known as Beacon Coal Mine Company Road, to the Northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; Thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line to the centerline of 68 Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8, Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); Thence Northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road, County Road No. 8 and Monster Road), as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats, Page 75, Records of King County; Thence Northwesterly along said road centerline 250.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th Street), as platted in C.D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as Recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 24, Records of King County; Thence Westerly along said extension to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right•of•way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, Page 545, Volume 821, Page 263 of deeds, Records of King County; HughG.Goldsmith .0 & Associates, Inc. „f ^�- :r -•. .�:._ .w. ,ar'.mfu'�n ?t R77Ff•l?: ;a +, +�:6p�p - : 'w'�. .,..y :.i. ''IY �'” .7' :.; :'v : `w� ^r. �a:. : .r. �:r� 3i . f?�"� •Si- u•. "..,... �ct. �,... a.......... h ;,t� + ".Cik.,,1. +.r:'c�'t.t -.�.r r�4` 9�i�' i �c. h...; iv�d.. 7st•• a'': e�ry f"> li,:; 1....' �.. crsi+;..,... n�i •errnus,;sr;�..�.�maaaa.:.• cr�YVCec?:t,strc��»a,,:'L `vracY.. :rivu�a. r., ... +•' >.'7^. E7": =@.. s.,.� ,.t5�.. . w, I: �; �i.. ::YP::ik�f'�..<oti:L.f,d.'� ' TRACT "A" Page 4 of 4 Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish. River; Thence'Westerly' and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River. and waterway. to the East line of Section 32. Township 24 North. Range 4 East; Thence continuing Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River on a bearing of N 49'0Q'00" W. a distance of 248.89 feet; Thence N 11'51'37" E along the Southwesterly extension of the Easterly margin of 16th Avenue South and continuing along said Easterly margin to the North line of Section 33. Township 24. Range 4 East which is also the Seattle City Limit line; Thence Easterly along said North line and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT that portio of the following described Tract "A" lying North of the centerline of South : -rton Street extended Westerly. That portion of the Franc's McNatt Donation Land Claim in Section 33. Township 24 North, Range 4 East. W.M.. in Ring County. Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING on the Easterly marg of East Marginal Way South at a point S 23 ° 40'59" E 895.56 feet from the tersection of said Easterly margin and the North line of said Donation Land Maim; Thence Northwesterly along the Ea terly line of East Marginal Way South 352.65 feet to the South line of Boeing Field; Thence N 89'58'17" E along said South line of Boeing Field 474.62 feet to a point on a line which is parallel w th and 500 feet Westerly measured at right angles to the center line of Boei s Field Main Runway No. 4; Thence S 29 52'38" E along said parall= line 372.42 feet; Thence S 89 ° 58'17" W to the POINT OF BEt NNING. (Being known as a portion of Tract 6. Th Meadows according to the unrecorded plat thereof) August 24, 1988 King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th SE, Suite 122 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Subject: King County Fire District #1 Annexation BRB file 1450 Dear Board Members: This correspondence is intended to update and clarify testimony presented at the June 16 and August 9, 1988 public hearings on the above referenced annexation proposal. On August 22, 1988, the mayors from the cities of Renton and Tukwila signed a memorandum of understanding (please refer to the attached), indicating both cities' intent to negotiate an interlocal agreement addressing land use, service delivery and annexation in the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way known as "subarea 3." The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to formalize the deletion of subarea 3 from Tukwila's Fire District #1 annexation proposal, and to establish joint development review of all annexation and land use proposals in the subarea. The City of Renton requests that the King County Boundary Review Board include this letter and the attached memorandum of understanding in the Board's official record on the City of Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1. Furthermore, the City of Renton respectfully requests that the Board modify the annexation boundaries to exclude the area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way known as subarea 3 (please refer to the attached map). If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Larry Springer or Carrie Trimnell at 235 -2552. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed annexation. Sincerely, Earl Clymer Mayor Attachments ...e,.....« �.. i`;. �c: i;+' r c.,: �, tir.: �' rM ��SY.:+..`. �i» ti&:: i(> iY ii: S•: r:.fi: =.�..a.�m.:�a:.t. ✓ ::r.... MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between the Cities of Renton and Tukwila in Regards to Tukwila's Proposed Annexation of King County Fire District #1 The City of Tukwila has accepted a petition to annex the property encompassed by King County Fire District #1 utilizing the election method and has filed that petition with the King County Boundary Review Board. King County Fire District #1 includes an area (Attachment A) east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way, south of State Route 900, and north of the existing Renton corporate limits in the vicinity of Metro's Renton Sewage Treatment Plant (hereafter referred to as the Subject Area.) The Cities of Renton and Tukwila recognize that the Subject Area is within the Planning and Impact Areas of both Cities and, as such, any development in this area may have visual, environmental, transportation, public service and utility impacts on one or both of the Cities. The Renton City Council adopted Resolution 2561, and the Tukwila City Council adopted Resolution 1008, and the Cities of Renton and Tukwila acknowledged in a prior interlocal agreement that they will jointly review any future annexations in the vicinity of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way, consistent with the 1987 Renton - Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment. The planning staff members from the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are currently negotiating an interlocal agreement addressing inter - governmental cooperation, land use, service delivery, and annexation in the Subject Area. The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to: 1. Establish a cooperative relationship through which Renton and Tukwila can develop and maintain compatible policies regarding land use, service delivery and annexations within the Subject Area; and 2. Create a workable system for inter - jurisdictional communication between Renton and Tukwila in the implementation of mutual goals within the Subject Area; and 3. Provide a means whereby Renton and Tukwila will consider each other's plans regulations and policies in land use development decisions within the Subject Area; and 4. Establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting the King County Boundary Review Board to delete the Subject Area from Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1; and 5. Provide a means by which Renton will support the annexation of all or a portion of the Subject Area to Renton. SIGNED this 71)1/04 day of , 1988. Earl Clymer Mayor, City of Renton ct:dsk3c:fdlmemo .01 pip -- 77/4114,_ - G nD sen Mayor, City of Tukwila 11!311 , 1 ,Jo \ �` • ti :tlll Iii 111111 It, M • --S "• • 5 —4/ 4:wnwvieffy ; 11 r i < `- Alternative 1 Fire District No 1 Annexation Petition Alternative 1A y` � t �t �C f.�l.ri)�.r},i5�� ; b t Ti. N;' �:i:it . f.' S.' s�lsl.::. �{ �= r::.f... hia.' iF�^} 31e :trv.La1'�ar. ✓rrr..Ah. %S.i�.:1`S Liv`s. i��ei ..�1^ �.Yu. +: \.�S = )i1�F ?7i �1L. �T! AlternatiVe 2 snax!xn rrY++.L7.'A'Y�L e.*L^.�v�+h�fn'A TI4N. i' , :t?;:r:�'r.: ". ""Y: *)e•!�wr.4 7 tis 4 'dItIi'r Lt k 4 ' VC* * . X 1" • ''')■..:).!- \ b: ' ' ' ',..:1) t . . Lit= f. ,•'...' `•". - ...1 Sfir...t:,... i 1 . •-')... Z i :".-----"; . . '' ,S, . A \ \ ece 7, Y• • ; , q - - I . ‘-• s . t 4 ( L. .. :. ... J • . ., i____.: _ff. 4 t: ! ' ': • T'' , 1-- - 1 1.,;..r. - rj ..-- - -- -- ° I .. �' — :- 1; �•�` a F ' —' " .- ._ , • e a 1 , ` , :Nit, -..W -! r- t llT • - ice Q ~ TL �r CM 7 re. •'1 i Ib'�bj• : � •w . t �� r V ' • • 1 :. 1 1 1. 7t:J . • b• --( . w0- • .1'61 7; u I-/\ \ : \ . \� .{... v _I 1 I1 11 Y _1 .t wi. + � -1 .�1 • • l d e r � � ; , ' •"\ .� ' J•i .. » `I • �i:••R • ` n'l . l ■ \ \ I 1.1. ri.1)111 1 I ik • 4 ,;`\.' ,:' . . . • . ". 9: . . EXHIBIT C' • Areas Subject to Joint Tukwile-Renton Review of all Future AnnexattOb Petitions aeff,VA(A_ /4#0 FM: I/Vis /7 j j ?-to i State Boiit'uiarti Review f- King Coiitit i Minor Boundary Adjustments TO: BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretar RE: FILE NO. 1450 - CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed Annexation (King County Fire District No. 1) 1. A small triangular island between Seattle and Tukwila would be created. It is displayed on File Item #54 and is described as Area #4 on the F.D. 1 map. A legal description has been prepared for this area. However, adding it would create a short stretch of Airport Way in Tukwila's jurisdiction August 18, 1988 7 Continuation On Monday, August 15th, the King County Council adopted a motion requesting that the Board continue the hearing. (See Motion 7277 enclosed.) The motion calls for a continuance of a definite period of time, but anticipates that a period will be addressed by the Board in consultation with City and County officials. If Tukwila opposes the continuance proposed by the King County Council, the Board should consult with its counsel regarding an acceptable, reasonable time period. If the City concurs with the Board, then it presumably would further waive the 120 -day limit. Tukwila might request a long delay so that the annexation may be completed only shortly before the March 1st deadline for receipt of tax revenues. I refer to March 1, 1990, because completion for 1989 will be very doubtful if there is a delay of more than two months. Several small imperfections in the boundary resulted from the use of the District's corporate limits for the petition. Most were first pointed out in a letter of February 16, 1988, from King County Engineering Services (File Item #59). These have been drawn on a map which has not yet been entered as an exhibit, but which is entitled "Fire District 1 "; it has a scale of 1 "= 2000'. The following numbered seven paragraphs coincide with those of the February 16th letter. fr r�' 3 ' . , �a� ; ... +.:Y .�. r\ t.. a' rcr-: C.? a� :;• w: : ww. a�aSc ` .. .. "...Y _. R.�.a.....nw, . .xMC4. �.. !. F'. XJ).+• WJT YN' �s':tSY�N:.'ik "..:SC.flN".':':C [{. .Cda :. . MEMORANDUM TO BOARD August 18, 1988 Page Two with the balance in Seattle. For this reason, it is recom- mended that the island remain for annexation by Seattle. 2. The description improperly employs the centerline of 51st Ave., So. The use of centerlines is prohibited even where use of the right -of -way line will create an island. (See paragraph 3.) 3. The description also uses the centerline of So. 120th Street. To correct the problems created by the use of centerlines, the description must be amended. The City of Tukwila has submitted a revised description which purportedly corrects these and other problems. It is currently being reviewed by Engineering Services. y 4. The description also uses the centerlines of 68th Ave. South and Beacon Coal Mine Road. The comments in paragraph 3 above apply. 5. The description fails to include small portions of the right -of -way of 42nd Ave., South and Interurban Avenue, at the intersection of these two streets. This is described as Area #2 on the Fire District 1 Map. A legal description for this area has been prepared for addition. 6. Engineering Services recommends that the description should use the thread of the Duwamish River instead of the east line. Under state law, the City would have jurisdiction to the thread or centerline regardless of the description used. This change reportedly has been incorporated in the City's newly revised description. 7. The description submitted did not in this instance follow the actual Fire District 1 boundary. The District description called out the westerly extension of So. Rose Street as its northern boundary on the west side of East Marginal Way. The description submitted uses a line approximately 900 feet to the south. (See File Item #52.) This was done to avoid dividing a building and it appears to be a practical boundary. However, the revised boundary submitted by MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD August 18, 1988 Page Three . Tukwila follows the river north to the 16th Ave. South bridge and then to the Seattle boundary. This would eliminate as much unincorporated territory as possible without including the bridge or territory on the south side of the river (South Park). There are two problems with Tukwila's approach. First, the existing Seattle boundary splits two buildings. Tukwila believes a boundary adjustment with Seattle could be negotiated. Second, there is a problem in determining a line along 16th Ave. South because in 1971 the County Commissioners vacated the right -of -way under the bridge. City and County engineers are addressing this problem. Of course, addition of the entire island, or the part east of the river, would avoid this problem. (See Area #1 on the Fire District 1 Map, and File Item #52.) 8. East Marginal Way should be included in the annexation to eliminate a small and impractical County maintenance responsibility in the area. (See File Item #52.) This would be accomplished if the entire island, or that part east of the Duwamish, were added. Any lesser addition should include it. The City's revised description does include it. 9. Two small islands exist within the annexation. They will be eliminated by deleting exceptions from the description. They are noted as Areas #1 and #5 on the Fire District 1 Map. 10. The City identified five instances in which tax lots would be split. The first (the North Boeing Building) would be eliminated by adding all of Area #1 or using the City's revised legal description. The second, (the Associated Grocers property), can be approached by deleting the portion to be annexed so that Seattle might annex it, or by including it and relying upon Tukwila and Seattle to adjust the boundary. The City's revised legal takes the latter approach and is recommended. The new description also deletes portions of tax lots in the vicinity of 51st Ave. South and 56th Place, South, relying upon Seattle to annex the remainder. The Rainier Bank property in the vicinity of South 124th Street remains divided by the City's updated description using the %r.�.... ��. Sys. • �yr MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD August 18, 1988 Page Four cZ logic that the south portion will be in the Riverton annexation. The Bank wants to be included, so it is recommended that no change be made. Should this annexation succeed and the Riverton annexation fail, the bank can annex the balance. As you can appreciate, due to the large number of options, it is not practical to prepare a single description in the hope that it might be correct; instead, descriptions of most of the options have been prepared or are now in process. Some changes require only deletions from the description. Once the Board directs preparation of a hearing decision, a final description can be assembled quickly. Major Boundary Adjustments 1. SUBAREA 3 It is recommended that Subarea 3 be deleted for the following reasons: a. Such an adjustment would be consistent with the establishment of the Burlington- Northern right -of -way as a common boundary in this area. The 1987 agreement between Renton and Tukwila estab- lished this line in a process of boundary adjustments which elim- inated impractical boundaries. (See File Items #118, #119, #120.) b. The area is within Renton's Comprehensive Plans for water and sewer services. Renton currently provides sewer service to the Empire Estates apartment complex on Empire Way. c. Annexation could disrupt Renton's Oakesdale Avenue arterial project, a new major entry point to the City. Tukwila has submitted a legal description of Subarea 3. If incorporated in the annexation description as an exception, it would delete the territory south of South 126th Street and east of the Burlington- Northern right -of -way and existing Tukwila corporate limits. (See Exhibit N.) The problem of providing fire service remains should the balance of the area be annexed. Subarea 3 would be the only remaining portion of Fire District 1 and would have a population of 543, most of whom are in the 240 -unit Empire Estates apartments. Clearly, Tukwila or Renton would have to serve the area until annexation to Renton can be accomplished. bnalz"r :T MEMORANDUM TO THE BOARD August 18, 1988 Page Five . SIXTEENTH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE GBM /pr mrc un.,uktemalaxvMaVAPMSLIZOZA uIsmtmmo: f lh"s wnIffi °.. .6 ;.,. An assurance from Renton that annexation will be pursued promptly should be obtained prior to deleting the area. It is assumed that the property owners will annex as an alterantive to having no fire protection. In the alternative, Renton could initiate an annexation election. Should negotations between Tukwila and the . County not be fruitful, it is recommended that the Board consider using the thread of the river as a boundary past the bridge and to its intersection with Seattle. This would seem to accomplish the five pertinent objectives (RCW 36.93.180[1],- [2], [3], [4], and [8]) of the Boundary Review Board Act. CCs The Honorable Greg Nickels, King County Council ATTN: Tim Ceis, Legislative Aide The Honorable Paul Barden, King County Council The Honorable City Councils, Cities of Renton, Tukwila King County Parks, Planning and Resources Department ATTN: Mr. James C. Tracy, Deputy Director 7SG r r /366 :i/o7q /ethfl foid-ef-s Ae&J) ctr)14 c6)°,6/7 O Da-eJ ;; y / �`J � 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 August 11,• 1988 1222C:SM:mis INTRODUCED BY• '`'" ta�.`.ttLLS e 1 PROPOSED N0. 8 8 6 0 8 MOTION NO.�� A MOTION requesting the Boundary Review Board to continue the public hearing on the proposed annexation by the City of Tukwila of King County Fire District No. 1 WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has proposed to annex an area of unincorporated King County commonly referred to as King County Fire District No. 1, and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation would create an isolated island of unincorporated King County surrounded by municipal jurisdictions at the northern boundary of the annexation area, and WHEREAS, within that island of unincorporated King County lies the 16th Avenue Bridge,a regionally significant transportation corridor which is in need of replacement or extensive reconstruction at an estimated cost of $30 million, and WHEREAS, the proposed boundaries of the annexation leave this major infrastructure liability to King County while delivering the supporting revenue base to Tukwila, and WHEREAS, by Motion No. 1078, dated July 5, the City of Tukwila has stated its willingness to negotiate a fair share cost of replacing or repairing the 16th Avenue Bridge, and WHEREAS, insufficient time has passed to allow negotiations to proceed or reach a satisfactory conclusion, and WHEREAS, the southern part of the proposed annexation referred to as Subregion 3 lies within the planning'area of the City of Renton and is included in future annexation plans by that city, and WHEREAS, Tukwila's proposal to zone lands currently designated Heavy Industrial down to Light Industrial in Subregion 3 is opposed by owners of those properties, and WHEREAS, the City of Renton has officially requested the Boundary Review Board to delete Subregion 3 from the proposed annexation, and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ATTEST: WHEREAS, when considering annexation state code recognizes the need to provide government services and controls to all areas, and WHEREAS, creation of a tiny island of unincorporated King County would make efficient and adequate delivery of public services and controls to residents of that area difficult, and WHEREAS, the boundaries of the Fire District No. 1 annexation as currently proposed by the City of Tukwila would create illogical and abnormally irregular boundaries in violation of.the objectives of the Boundary Review Board as defined by the Revised Code of the State of Washington, and WHEREAS, the residents, businesses and property owners of the proposed annexation are currently provided with government services at adequate levels and there exists no compelling reason for precipitous action by the Boundary Review Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: The Boundary Review Board is hereby requested to grant a continuance for a definite period of time of the public hearing on the matter of the proposed King County Fire District No. 1 annexation by the City of Tukwila pending the outcome of discussions and negotiations by interested jurisdictions as to the disposition and resolution of the issues described in this motion. BE IT FURTHER MOVED, that should the Boundary Review Board resolve not to grant a continuance of the public hearing, the King County council must oppose the annexation of Fire District No. 1 to the City of Tukwila as the boundaries are currently proposed. PASSED this /5Y da y of C elrk of the Council 1222C:TC:mis KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON , 19 88 . /!% ter / Ch"ir -2- ►7271 4 rR.n. •r ::'1 q :'ai s . :.. v .. �l. C7N. a t r .i ?R;Xti P, , ,5T >.� . 7 .. a.;f,.,, �!-�. 1, ,�1^''�+,. e: ^k;' rLrs. �:s`.� ; ��r :!�.�, y ,�,,: n �, L yr J':S: ", }i5, . t: � ,.i,cj,S. ' ,.Yi'"�_lf�.`3t� ...;�r,>�a7 jf•�.n �.. }�,' r, lh �t��{,s1 +;`2.4 �wu"• h��u, a....` na��u.." L. �. dAZi�Sr: rr.. v,... f.? T. f' isi:! ZSii':!;: 1:..,. ns�..; f....., i, ii{' iur.— aa.' �t�.._,..^ �..>. s..' �o" nr:',. �. n... s. ��t..:,: �:, t��Iwrs.:...... �L.. ��e.,.....,,, �. �. �.. �,,,.ti.,.....:..<�..�a.s.r_,. ,..,._u� ",i,,..Sa.�7r 8.. ..�+.. -.r C *ILA August 15, 1988 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Council President Gary Grant 402 King County Courthouse Third Avenue and James Street Seattle, WA 98104 RE: MOTION 88608 REQUESTING CONTINUANCE OF BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD HEARING OF FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA Dear Council President Grant: HAND DELIVERED Because I am unable to attend this morning's meeting on this motion, I asked my staff to present this letter to you for me. I have attended the Boundary Review Board hearings on this annexation and am intimately involved in the issues. Tukwila has always been interested in working with the County to resolve issues. In this annexation the BRB asked Tukwila and the County to negotiate a single issue -- the 16th Avenue South Bridge. No other issues were raised for negotiation between the two jurisdictions. In response, Tukwila passed Resolution #1078 indicating our willingness to negotiate the bridge issue. The BRB continued the public hearing to August 23rd to receive more evidence of joint willingness to negotiate the bridge. Tukwila has done all it can do. I recommend that the County Council approve a similar resolution by that date to demonstrate that the County is willing to negotiate. It is recognized that more time is needed for the actual negotiations. Your motion addresses other issues on which the BRB has taken testimony. Further testimony on August 23rd was specifically requested by the BRB on only the 16th Avenue Bridge, not the other issues you raise. However, Tukwila and Renton have discussed Subarea #3 and are not adversarial in this annexation. Additionally, I would like your proposed Resolution to be more specific: to include but not limited to: 1. The period of time for negotiation and not leave it as indefinite. August 15, 1988 Page two n v. 2. Mention all parties that should be involved in the negotiations especially Seattle. 3. Provide authority to a specific person or department to negotiate. I recognize that this is a complex regional issue and we will continue to approach this on a regional basis. Sincerely, Gary Van Dusen, Mayor City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 I INTRODUCTION - MAYOR GARY VAN DUSEN A. Reason for seeking action FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION CITY OF TUKWILA PRESENTATION TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD a. Actions taken: 1. Petition initiated - Tukwila received in December 1986 a petition for election, signed by 96 voters out of 872 registered, requesting the annexation of the area described as Fire District No. 1. - Issued a Determination of Significance Hired a broad -based skilled team of consultants to prepare a comprehensive analysis of proposal. CCA, inc. - economic. finance and policy analysts, led the team which also included TDA - transportation experts; Hugh Goldsmith Associates - utility engineers; and Linda Stalzer Associates - land use planning. The scope of the study included both the physical environment and the fiscal /service impacts to Tukwila and other affected agencies. Worked with residents and businesses in the area through com- munity meetings and a task force formed of the same to address issues of concern and land use planning for the area. 2. Historical precedent (Issue has been ongoing since 1974) a. June 1974 - petition for annexation election of area described as Fire District No. 1 filed with Tukwila. b. BRB reviews in November 1974 and modifies area. c. Tukwila declines placing on ballot due to lack of information on impacts of smaller modified area. d. February 1978 - petition for annexation election filed with Tukwila for the Duwamish, Allentown, and Foster Point neighborhoods. e. January 1980 - BRB approval is appealed by King County Fire District No. 1, which is dismissed by Superior Court for prejudice. f. September 1983 - Election fails, 60 for /97 against, primarily due to concern over Fire District service and personnel. B. Relationship to surrounding area 1. West of subject proposal 2. Other annexations City of Tukwila Preser,.ation to the Boundary Review Board C. Outline of presentation II DESCRIPTION OF AREA Fire`vistrict No. 1 Annexation Page 2 A. Approximately 1,600 acres, 1,900 residents, and 20,000 employees. Per capita and density figures would tend to be misleading because of the diversity and uniqueness of several neighborhoods in the area. The average asseessed valuation per capita for the area is $246,478; by sub -area, #2 - $24,882, #3 - $28,124, and #4 - $67,787. B. Neighborhoods (see DEIS Figure 2, page 6 & Board) 1. Sub -Area 1 a. Land use - Urban Activity Center - (see DEIS Figure 7, page 24) - industrial, commercial, and public airport. b. Population - 1 single - family home c. Street circulation - East Marginal Way - 5 -lane arterial; Boeing Access Road - 5 -lane arterial access to I -5. 2. Sub -Area 2 a. Land use - primarily low - density residential b. Population 331 (17 %) c. Street circulation - South Ryan Way leads from I -5, a 4 -lane major arterial to "T" intersection of 51st Avenue South, which is a 2 -lane collector arterial. 3. Sub -Area 3 a. Land Use - mix of heavy industrial and commercial, and high- density residential. b. Population 543 (29 %) - 2/3 live in Empire Estates 240 -unit complex c. Street circulation - Empire Way South, 5 -lane State highway bor- ders the site. Access is also provided via South 129th 2 -lane collector arterial from Allentown which intersects with Empire Way. 68th Avenue provides access from the south through Renton. 4. Sub -Area 4 a. Land use - mix of low - density residential and light and heavy Industrial. b. Population 1,026 (54 %) - single - family owner - occupied housing c. Street circulation - East Marginal Way continues from north industrial area through to Tukwila and I -5 access. Interurban Avenue proceeds from Tukwila to intersection with East Marginal Way, also intersects with 42nd Avenue bridge leading into Allentown. City of Tukwila PresecLation Fire 'Istrict No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 3 1. Riverton 2. Foster 3. Thorndyke III PROCESS / APPROACH C. Growth 1. PSCOG projects slight decline in residential population (.5 percent) 2. Slight increase projected to year 2000 in number of employees. D. Topography - (see DEIS Figure 6, page 14 & Board) 1. Duwamish River Basin 2. Black River Basin E. Special Purpose Districts 1. Sewer - (see DEIS Figure 18, page 90 & Board) a. Val -Vue b. Seattle c. Renton d. Unsewered areas 2. Water - (see DEIS Figure 19 & Board) a. #25 (unfranchised) b. #125 c. Seattle d. Creston 3. School - (see Board) a. South Central b. Renton c. Seattle 4. Fire - (see Board) F. Tukwila Annexation Areas (see map handout & Board) - Annexation Policies (Attachment F) support and encourage annexations contiguous to the City's boundaries. Petitions for annexation election received and scheduled for February elections: A. Assembled a 900 - address mailing list - 7 mailings to date. B. Held two scoping /information meetings in September 1987 at Duwamish Fire Station and Rainier View Community Club. City of Tukwila PreseLation to the Boundary Review Board C. Assembled an annexation task force of residents, businesses, and a Tukwila Planning Commissioner to review issues and impacts with City staff and make recommendations. D. Land use open houses at Duwamish Fire Station and Rainier View Community Club in December 1987. E. Completed a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on proposal and held a public hearing February 1988. F. Issued a FEIS in March 1988. G. Held two public hearings before Tukwila Planning Commission and two public hearings before City Council, and then adopted ordinances to: 1. Amend City's Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 2) to include the subject area in Planning Area and provide land use designations. 2. Provide pre- annexation zoning and Tukwila Zoning Code amendments to maintain comparable zoning (Attachment 3). H. Met with officials from Boeing Field to address noise code concerns, and adopted amended legislation to provide compatibility with airport operations (Attachment 4). I. Provided an informational question- and - answer brochure for potential annexees. (Handout) IV ISSUES / IMPACTS A. Service 1. Police Currently have a level of urban police protection comparable with other cities, and provide a full range of services - traffic enforcement, crime protection, D.A.R.E., gambling and narcotic investigations. 2. Fire Due to configuration of proposal, an additional patrol district and officers are proposed. Fire District has a 10 -year contract signed in April 1987 with Tukwila to provide the District with fire protection, prevention and public education service. Its employees have become a part of the City's civil service system. No change is currently proposed. 3. Park Facilities and Recreation Services Fire No. 1 Annexation Page 4 Many of the City's parks will be centrally located to the annexation area. The Community Center is located in the north end of Tukwila two blocks from Interurban Avenue and the 42nd Avenue bridge. Recreation programs are open to all citizens, whether in the City or County. Fees are charged for classes and athletic leagues, with most youth and senior citizens programs free. Additional van service for seniors and recreational brochure mailings will be made available to any annexed area. The Duwamish /Green River Trail that's partially completed in Tukwila would continue on through the annexation area. Foster Golf Course and Fort Dent are large City of Tukwila PreseLation to the Boundary Review Board B. Utilities C. Fiscal Firistrict No. 1 Annexation Page 5 regional facilities that provide convenience and reduced fees for Tukwila residents. The Tukwila Parks and Open Space Plan is budgeted for updating and the annexation area will be included if annexed. 4. Other Municipal Services Analysis of impacts and costs of expanding existing services (such as street maintenance, surface water maintenance, engineering, planning and permitting services) have been made and folded into the fiscal analysis. 1. Critical Water Supply Study a. Intent is to resolve overlapping service areas and illogical purveyor boundaries, and to encourage municipal service in appropriate annexation areas. b. Timing of recommendations - a draft plan is being reviewed, implementation measures and map of study area are attached (Attachment 5). c. Recommendation is for Tukwila to assume majority of Water District #25's service area. Annexation will allow customers of water utility to participate and vote for their representatives. 2. Sewer - areas not covered within a service area would be included in Tukwila's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. If service by a special purpose district is more logical, maintenance and operations would be turned over to a District. 3. The remainder of the existing utility purveyors would continue with no change. 4. City Light's service area extends down into the City of Tukwila. They have expressed a concern about the fiscal impact due to the City's undergrounding ordinance. In practice, undergrounding is implemented in new streets. In these instances, contractual agreements may be made with the developer. On street improvement projects, Tukwila pays for the cost of undergrounding. 1. Based on an in -depth analysis of the revenues generated and the costs of operations and maintenance, the subject area can be adequately served by the City. The City of Tukwila currently has a $22 million debt capacity limit for general purposes, not including utilities or parks. This will increase to approximately $30 million after annexation. This capacity is capable of covering the projectjected capital improvements in the area (See DEIS, Table 17, page 99) . 2. King County (see DEIS Table 18, page 102) - Over $1 million loss in revenue, with savings in road maintenance costs and capital improvement programs. Net loss averages $471,000 to $683,000. 3. King County Rural Library System receives operating revenues from a property tax levy on unincorporated properties, and contracts with various municipalities. Tukwila currently pays $19.53 per capita to City of Tukwila PreseLation Firebstrict No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 6 the system. Under current terms of our contract, the library system would suffer a loss of $163,265. Mitigation through a revised contract along with analysis of other pending annexations is proposed. 4. Other jurisdictions - Loss of potential revenues would occur with Seattle who previously proposed annexing south to 104th Street and who provides sewer and water service to area. $375,252,400 in assessed valuation 80% of Fire District. Loss of potential revenues would occur to Renton and the loss of a portion of their planning area which extends to 68th Avenue South. The entire Sub -Area 3 has $15,271,800 or 3% of total. D. Tax lot splits - (See Attachment 6) 1. The existing Seattle boundary splits several tax lots. The proposal, because it abuts the Seattle limits, would perpetuate the splits. a. North Boeing building - request modification b. Associated Grocers c. 51st Avenue South (single - family homes) - request modification d. 56th Place South (single - family homes) - request modification e. Rainier Bank f. Airport E. Unincorporated islands /perimeter boundary (see Attachment 7) 1. Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 22 of C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 3 - Harry Peterson, resident and owner, signed a petition to be included in the annexation. 2. Airport Way - 2,000 feet of County road and railroad right -of -way. Airport Way is a Seattle road for its entire length except for this one spot. 3. Island at approximately 9120 East Marginal Way - Fire District No. 1 legal description was not a perimeter description. When property was added to District, edges never met at this location. 4. 16th Avenue (colored board) - 1,600 feet of 16th plus small segments of Orr, Rose, Southern, 12th, 14th, and half of Dallas Street in an island of land between the City of Seattle and the left bank of the Duwamish River. In reviewing modifications to proposal, it did not seem logical to include the area. V KING COUNTY ANNEXATION POLICIES A. PI -302 The County, through its Comprehensive Plan, supports growth and annexations within City boundaries to assure adequate facilities and service. COMMENT Annexation would assure adequate service and facilities to the area. City of Tukwila Presentation to the Boundary Review Board Fire No. 1 Annexation Page 7 B. PI -303 The County has pledged itself to an active role in municipal annexations, supporting them when consistent with land use plans. C. PI -304 County has established a policy of developing agreements for future annexation areas. VI SUMMARY COMMENT The annexation is consistent with land use plans which show this area as urban and therefore better served by a municipality. COMMENT County is in process of hiring staff to handle an interlocal on Fire District No. 1. When we received this annexation petition in 1986, we at the onset determined to: - Respect the wishes of the petitioners for the boundary - Carefully analyze the impacts - Go through an extensive citizen involvement process - Address head -on the issues that come up Our annexation policy is favorable to annexation petitions and to long -term growth of the City to the north, northwest and west. Fire District No. 1 is a logical extension of that policy. It is an urban area that has been the subject of several annexation attempts. The physical boundaries we are recommending make sense and form an area we can serve, either with existing facilities or in cooperation with existing service providers in the area. We recognize that interlocal agreements may be required and we have been prepared to immediately begin those negotiations. We are committed to providing urban services to the District and have studies those costs. The revenues generated in the District and its costs will very likely balance out once annexation occurs. Community and task force meetings give us a good feel for the affected neighborhoods. Individuals in the area identify with the Fire District. This annexation will continue that association. As many of the boundary irregularities as possible have been resolved in our recommendation. We prioritized respecting the wishes of the community for the boundary in our approach. This is an urban area which King County policy designates for annexation and for provision of services by a city. We feel we are the most logical city to serve Fire District No. 1. We are committed to that service: witness our existing 10 -year contract with the District for mutual fire service and the integration of the two fire departments. Therefore, based upon 18 months of an extensive public involvement process with the District and 14 months of experience with a reciprocal Fire Department contract, we found that the annexation of the District to Tukwila makes sense and conforms to the objectives of the BRB. This annexation also conforms to the long -term objectives of the community. This annexation is within the long -term interest and policy of the City. It should be annexed as recommended. City of Tukwila Preserl to the Boundary Review Board ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tukwila Annexation Policies 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance 3. Pre - Annexation Zoning Ordinance 4. Noise Amendment Ordinance 5. Critical Water Supply Study Excerpts 6. Tax Lot Splits 7. Islands (26 /FDL.PRES1 -3) Fire strict No. 1 Annexation Page 8 y 19 G. Brice Martin Boundary Review Board 906 Smith Tower, MS 9ST Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Brice: • GREG NICKELS King County Council District Eight August 5, 1988 w.•.... r Iran �<..n ^4• +•.:t:c:�Yl ep OD I would like to comment on the proposed annexation of Fire District #1 by the City of Tukwila. It is my policy to support annexation and incorporation of urban areas that would be better served by a municipal government and where the area is a logical extension of the annexing jurisdiction. As presently proposed this annexation to Tukwila does not appear to meet that criteria. ....The annexation boundaries have been drawn in a manner that would create an isolated island of unincorporated King County completely surrounded by other jurisdictions at the north end of the annexation. Within this area lies the 16th Avenue South bridge. The bridge, constructed in 1930, is in need of replacement or extensive overhaul, both of which will require a significant capital investment. The annexation of Fire District #1 will direct tax revenue generated by the industrial properties to Tukwila, _ile leaving_a major infrastructure liability of the area to King County. The bridge'' "s capital needs and annual operation and itifenanc costs would no longer be served by the 501 neighboring revenue base. This fact makes it unlikely the area would ever be considered separately for annexation by another jurisdiction. If approved as proposed the annexation would allow an abnormally irregular boundary contradicting the objectives of the Boundary Review Board as defined by RCW 36.93.180. Existing municipal boundaries and lack of a clear policy by King County dealing with annexations have contributed to the boundary and jurisdictional problems that the Fire District annexation creates. The Tukwila City Council, by Resolution No. 1078, dated July 5, authorized the mayor of Tukwila to negotiate with King County and other agencies to reach a compromise on the disposition of the 16th Avenue South bridge. I would request the Boundary Review Board to delay issuance of a ruling to allow the interested jurisdictions of Tukwila, the City of Seattle and Tukwila, to continue discussion of the issues connected to the proposed annexation. 402 King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 296 -1008 Printb on Recycled Pellet w11.mYr. i•lY`�'- + It will be in the best interests of government, business and residents of the annexation area if a compromise satisfactory to all jurisdictions can be achieved. Sincerely, reg Nic rels ing County Councilmember .....:. + ...... a ,.. w. sraar`: ntyrt7`. rrw` l: ti� ^?.i:E:,!tale�'.yr;? evtr_ L'iy�'nt ?.';x:ls.^'�uf�'!�' + .., c4ll TML A MOTION requesting the Boundary Review Board to continue the public hearing on the proposed annexation of King County Fire District No. 1 by the City of Tukwila WHEREAS the City of Tukwila has proposed to annex are area of unincorporated King County commonly refered to as King County Fire District No. 1, and WHEREAS the proposed annexation would create an isolated island of '.inincoporated King County surrounded by municipal jurisdictions at the northern boundary of the annexation area, and WHEREAS within that island of unincorporated King County lies the 16th Avenue Bridge a regionaly significant transportation corridor which is in need of replacement extensive reconstruction at an estimated cost of $30 million, and or WHEREAS the proposed boundaries of the annexation leave this major infrastructure liability to King County while delivering the supporting revenue base to Tukwila, and WHEREAS by motion 1078 dated ly 5 the City of Tukwila has stated it's willingness to n otiate a fair share cost of replacing or repairing the 16th Avenue Bridge, and WHEREAS i ns of f i cent time has passed to allow neg c.t i at i ons to proceed or reach a satisfactory conclusion, and WHEREAS the southern part of the proposed annexation refered to as Subregion 3 lies within the planning area of the city of Renton and is included in future annexation plans by that city, and WHEREAS Tukwi la' s proposal to zone lands currently designated Heavy Industrial down to Light Industrial in Subregion 3 is opposed by owners of these properties, and WHEREAS the City of Renton has officially requested the Br_'udary Review Beard to delete Subregion 3 from the proposed annexation WHEREAS when considering annexation state code recognizes the need to provide government services and controls to all areas, and Whereas creation of an isolated pocket of unincorporated King County would make efficient and adequate delivery of public services and controls to residents of that area difficult, and Hg., wAs w�i�., �;,'' �" c��' Eiaiiih�S .'I£ {rtt.,`�.'reu[;rmsawnx� ra ,t„z.. - ...,.. .,,...,.r.. ,. .,,..,...n 0016 1t xnk sWItIMaxr+;,rye,arrs ;vFIYMAtt MSWsV, Atra F;1 Z WHEREAS the boundaries of the Fire District No. 1 annexation as currently proposed by the City of Tukwila would create abnormally irregular boundaries contrary to the objectives of the Boundary Review Board as defined by the Revised Code of the State of Washington, and WHEREAS the residents, businesses and property owners of the proposed annexation, are currently provided with government services at adequate levels and there exists no compelling reason fcsr precipitous action by the Boud ary Review Board; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT MOVED by the Council of King County: The Boundary Review Board is hereby requested to grant a continuance for 'an indefinite period of time of the public hearing on the matter of the proposed King County Fire .District No. 1 annexation, by the City of Tukwila pending the outcome of discussions and negoitiations by interested jurisdictions as to the disposition and resolution of the issues described in this motion. BE IT FURTHER MOVED, That should the Boundary Review Beard resolve not to grant a continuance of the public hearing the King County Council must oppose the annexation, of Fire District Ni:'. 1 to the City of Tukwila as the boundaries are currently proposed. REBUTTAL TO CONTINUANCE The petitioners, property owners and businesses in the Fire District have been working very hard on this petition for the past 18. months. We feel we have gotten the petition to the point now of resolving the significant issues, except for the 16th Ave. bridge which only late in the process became an issue of significance. Our petition does not include that bridge and we request that it not be included now because a lot of negotiations are required to resolve how and whom is to pay for .At. We can't afford all of it. We have addressed it as . • far as- we can at this point and have gone on record as willing to pay our fair share. Instead of continuing the hearing we request that our petition be approved, without the bridge, and the bridge area remain an island of king County until Seattle, the County....and.City complete_._ those negotiations. Those negotiations will take time because the Feds, State as well are involved. We won't therefore be able to complete_ the negotiations. by. February_, because we and- the -... County are beginning budget process that will last until December. If we miss the February ballot we lose the critical _ and_ necessary,_-. revenues_ for.. ,_. 1989. Therefore_,__....we......would _...of_. necessity have to await the November 1989 ballot. This is an undue delay in the annexation process and frustrating to the residents and businesses in the Fire. District__ .._.____.. ._ .. For those reasons we oppose the continuance, although we understand_ why the County_ reguested ..it.. _- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROCEEDINGS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY IN RE: CITY OF TUKWILA - Proposed ) Annexation (King County Fire Dist. 1), ALL IN KING COUNTY, ) WASHINGTON ) FILE NO. 1450 FACTORS AFFECTING THE PROPOSAL RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION The Notice of Intention filed in Boundary Review Board File No. 1450 proposed the annexation of certain territory by the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. After notice duly given, a hearing was held June 16, 1988, before a quorum of the Board at Foster Nigh School. The said hearing was continued on August 9, 1988, at Foster High School. Legal notice was provided prior to the August 9th hearing for the modification be addition of certain islands and other territory contiguous to the annexation. The :searing was continued on August 24, 1988, in Hearing Room No. 1 of the .offices of the Board in Bellevue, Washington. On the basis of the testimony, evidence, and exhibits presented at said Hearing, and the matters on file in said File No. 145C. :t is the decision of said Board that the action proposed in said Notice of Inte ^.ton be, and the same is, hereby approved as modified in accordance with the :-saes and legal description which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reverence. In reaching this: decision, the Board has considered the many factors presc: ibed in RCW 36.93.170. The following have been selected for particular attention. First, it should be noted that much of the information for this decision comes from the Draft Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the City. The DEIS divided the annexation area into four subareas, which will be referred to frequently in this Decision. The reader should refer to file documents if not familiar with these subareas. Annexation History In 1974, the residents of Fire District No. 1 petitioned the City of Tukwila for a similar annexation. In November of 1974, the Boundary Review Board approved the proposal but deleted the industrialized portion north of the Boeing Access Road, which contained roughly 80% of the assessed valuation. The City declined to accept the modified annexation. In 1978, another petition for annexation was received, this time from the Duwamish - Allentown area. It was approved by the Board in 1980 and an appeal was filed by the Fire District. The Board's decision was upheld and the issue went to a vote of the people in April, 1983. It was rejected. PAGE ONE - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) ATTACHMENT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In 1979 the City of Seattle received a petition of registered voters seeking the annexation to the City of an area known as "South Park "; the City filed a Notice of Intention for this annexation in October, 1980. The area included most of the northern, industrialized part of the subject annexation area. The annexation was denied by the Board. Population and Territory The Notice of Intention described the population as 2,227. The DEIS describes it as follows: SUBAREA NO. 1 SUBAREA NO. 2 SUBAREA NO. 3 SUBAREA NO. 4 TOTAL: -0- 221 543 1,026 1,900 There is one single family dwelling in Subarea No. 1, owned by the Boeing Company. Subarea No. 3 is by this decision deleted, which results in a population of 1,357. This would be a 28% increase in the City's current population of 4,780. Additionally, there are approximately 20,000 employees working here, most in Subarea No. 1 (north of the Boeing Access Road.) The proportion of single family dwellings in the City would shift. The City's housing is divided into 33% single family and 67% multiple family. Following annexation, this would become 42% and 58%, respectively, due to the higher percentage of single family dwellings within the annexation. As filed, the annexation is approximately 2.6 square miles. Acreage information was not provided by subarea, but it is estimated that as modified the annexation contains approximately 2.2 square miles. This is due to deletion of Subarea No. 3 which is approximately .4 square miles. The additions of territory are small except for the eastern half of the Duwarr.ish River. The amount of that territory l as not been calculated. According to the City, the existing area of the City we ild be increased by approximately 44% by the addition of Alternative II, which is similar to the area as approved herein.. Comprehensive Plans and Zoning The King County Comprehensive Plan states that the County will provide urban services at a feasible level for unincorporated urban areas, but recognizes that it cannot do so at the levels generally provided by cities. The plan supports logical annexation of developed areas. Additionally, it suggests the use of Interlocal Agreements to address planning issues in potential annexation areas. King County has therefore supported the proposed annexation, but has also urged that the boundary be expanded in a northerly and westerly direction to include all unincorporated territory in the vicinity of South Park and the 16th Avenue South bridge. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as urban and assumes a mix of uses. The King County Shorelines Master Program designates most of the area along the Duwamish River as Urban Environment. The Tukwila and Renton Comprehensive Plans also apply in portions of the area. Where they overlap, the plans and policies of Tukwila do not differ significantly from those of the County. This is particularly so regarding land use classifications. Tukwila does handle some land use issues PAGE TWO - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 . 23 24 25 26 27 28 differently. For example, King County manages environmentally sensitive areas with a special ordinance and a series of map folios identifying steep slopes, unstable soils, and other high risk features. The City on the other hand relies upon the Uniform Building Code and the State Environmental Policy Act for dealing with these problems. The annexation includes a wide variety of land uses. Subarea No. 1 (being the portion north of the Boeing Access Road) is completely developed with commercial and industrial uses. It includes the Boeing Company, Kenworth Truck Company, Rhone Poulenc, Inc., Associated Grocers, and Jorgensen Steel. It includes 500 acres of industrial lands, 165 of which are within the boundaries of the King County International Airport. All of Subarea No. 1 is zoned Heavy Manufacturing (M -H). Approximately 19,000 people are employed there. Subarea No. 2 lies east of I -5 and is otherwise bounded by the City of Seattle. It is characterized by steep slopes and most of it is zoned RS -7200 with small portions of Neighborhood Business (BN) and some Multiple Family (RM- 1800). There are two small Light Manufacturing zones in the area. The slopes and landslide and seismic hazard designations in much of this area have kept it sparsely developed. The resulting irregular street pattern has also discouraged development. Subarea No. 3 is located generally south of South 126th Street and east of the existing Tukwila limits. (Although this decision often refers to the deletion of Subarea No. 3, it should be noted that the area deleted is only that portion lying east of the east margin of the Burlington- Northern Railroad right -of -way.) Most of this area is industrial in character, but it includes the 250 -unit Empire States Apartments and a few single family dwellings. Much of the area is in steep slopes. It includes 166 acres of industrial land. The Black River Quarry is one of the sites once considered as a possible energy resource recovery site by King County. It is referred to informally as the incinerator site. It is not now apparently under serious consideration. Zoning is predominantly RM -2400, RM -900 and . M -H. Like Subarea No. 2 there are hazard areas due to unstable soils. Most of Subarea No. 3 is within the interest area of Renton as described in its Comprehensive Plan. Most of the population in Subarea No. 3 (543 people) is located in the aforementioned apartment complex. Subarea No. 4, (the Allentown- Duwamist"- Foster Point Area), is bounded by the Boeing Access Road on the north, the Duwamist► River on the west, Tukwila on the south, and Interstate 5 on the east. The northern portion is predominately commercial and industrial. Metro and Boeing facilities occupy most of the southwest portion. The south half is primarily residential, including the Allentown, Duwamish and Foster Point neighborhoods. Zoning generally reflects land use in this area and includes 190 acres of M -H and M -P (Manufacturing Park) classifications. The neighborhoods are mostly zoned SR -9600. Most of Subarea 4 is a Class III Seismic Hazard Area. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan includes Allentown and designates it as low- density, single family at 0 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The industrial areas east and west of Allentown are designated Light Industrial by the City. The City's proposed land use designations reflect existing County classifications with very minor exceptions. Most of these exceptions are located in Subarea No. 3. Consequently they are not discussed herein. A majority of the land now in Tukwila is zoned Industrial or Commercial. Residential areas constitute approximately 407 acres of the City's 2,888 acres. The annexation as modified would add nearly 800 acres of residential land, most of which is single family. It would also add 700 acres of industrial lands. Most of Tukwila is substantially developed. The annexation would provide some undeveloped PAGE THREE - TUKWILA /P.D. /1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 25 26 27 28 areas, primarily in Subarea No. 2, for additional improvements. However, development in that area is limited by the steep slopes. There are opportunities for redevelopment in Subarea No. 1. Underdeveloped sites and parking lots could be converted to more intense uses. Housing units in Tukwila would increase by 446 (from 2,598 to 3,044). Little population growth is expected as a result of the annexation, other than the numbers to be added immediately. A modest upward trend in employment following redevelopment in industrial areas is expected. Services: Community Services Most community services such as Cooperat;ve Extension, Veterans Services, Youth Work Training, Administration of Block Grant Funds, and Public Health Services, are provided by the State, County, or private agencies. Most of these services would continue unchanged. It is estimated in the DEIS that contracts for human services and health services, etc., would increase by $9,730 for the City. Services: Library The King County Rural Library District serves unincorporated King County and many of the cities therein. It collects a tax of $0.50 per $1,000 of assessed value in the unincorporated portions of the County and in some incorporated portions of the District. (Bellevue and Bothell have annexed to the District.) Some cities provide their own library services but others, such as Tukwila, obtain service by contract. Tukwila is charged $0.12 per $1,000 in assessed value not to exceed $19.50 per capita. The effect of this limit is that the Library System will lose revenue between $163,000 and $197,000 per year as a result of annexation with no diminution of service responsibilities. This is a substantial financial impact which could reduce the District's ability to provide services. The City is urged to reconsider its arrangement with the system and to provide an analysis of the cummulative impact upon the King County Rural Library System due to continued City annexation. Services: Justice System King County provides municipal -type judici,..1 and justice services in the area at an estimated cost of $9.31 per capita, or approximately $12,600. This is for detention, prosecution, indigent defense, and some misdemeanor adjudications. Most of the annexation is situated in the Roxbury Municipal Court District. The City's attorney and municipal court would take over these responsibilities. It is estimated that misdemeanor caseloads would increase only 5% following annexation of the area as modified. Traffic offense caseloads could increase as much as 100%. However, because those cases require little time, the total workload .increase would be modest according to the DEIS. As a result of annexation, the City would expend an additional $32,000 for all justice services. Services: Parks The annexation contains two parks: the Allentown County Park and the Duwamish Park, which is owned by South Central School District. According to the DEIS, the City would acquire at no cost a five acre portion of Allentown Park for development as a neighborhood park. This would be necessary to meet the Citv's park standards. The City has indicated it would spend $460,000 in developing that five acres. PAGE FOUR - TUKWILA /P.D. #1 (Apv. /Uod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 . 7- 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Services: Fire. Protection In April, 1987, King County Fire District No. 1 contracted with the City for service to the District for a period of ten years. The City hired the District employees and has, according to the contract, the right to use all District property. The 1987 assessed valuation of the District was $339.6 million dollars, resulting in tax revenues at $1.50 /$1000 of $599,000. In addition, Metro pays the District $12,000 annually in lieu of taxes for service. That payment would end following annexation. In 1987, the District paid the City $606,500, annualized. The Boeing Company maintains its own fire fighting force. Additionally, Boeing and Kenworth (and perhaps other large companies) contract with Seattle for backup fire protection. Tukwila provides basic life support services to the area. The assets of the District consist of fire equipment having a. replacement value of $670,964; reserve funds $400,000; and a fire station located at 12026 42nd Ave., South. (The $400,000 was apparently in reserve at the time the DEIS was prepared. It is not known what that balance is today.) According to the DEIS assets of the District approximate $1,000,000. All of these assets are located in Allentown (Subarea No. 4). There are 450 to °CC calls per year in the annexation area, of which an estimated 30 to 60 originate from Subareas No. 2 and No. 3. Subarea No. 3 (having 6296 of the population of the . ombined Subareas 2 F: 3), is estimated to generate from 19 to 37 calls per year. It Is further estimated that the two areas generate approximately $35,000 in revenues to t' a District, so less than that amount is derived from Subarea No. 3. The deletion of Subarea No. 3 could create service problems, if only temporarily. Should the annexation election be successful, Subarea No. 3 will be the only surviving portion of Fire District No. 1. The City is expected to take title to all or virtually all of the District's assets. RCW 35A.14.380 provides in part that a fire district in this situation may, tv a vote of the people residing outside the annexed area, require the City to provide service in the balance of the District, and agree to pay the City a reasonable fee for this .; ervice. The problem is that with a population of only 543 (most of whom are in the apartment complex) it is doubtful that there would be sufficient resources for a viable continuation of the District. This includes not only money, but it might be difficult to find three qualified people willing to run for election and serve as commissioners. The City of Renton has indicated it will initiate annexation proceedings promptly if Subarea No. 3 is deleted. It is expected that the period following the Tukwila annexation election until annexation to Renton can be completed will be brief. Services: Police PAGE FIVE - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) The annexation as modified includes 12.8% of the population of King County's N -2 Patrol District. There are 6,353 police calls annually in the District, and it is assumed that these are substantially attributable on a population basis, indicating approximately 800 calls per year in the annexation area. The estimated cost to King County in the annexation area is $110,200 annually on a per call basis. The County provides one and sometimes two patrols in N -2. It is unlikely that this level of service could be reduced following annexation. City response time is 2.5 minutes for Priority One (emergency) calls, and 7 to 8 minutes for non - emergency calls. King County response time is 7.4 to 9.1 minutes for Priority One calls, and 14.1 to 16.4 minutes for Priority Two. The City would 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 likely provide superior police service, but at a cost estimated in the DEIS at $243,000 annually for six patrol officers, plus $40,500 for one traffic officer. A patrol car and motorcycle would be needed, and jail and communiciation service costs would increase. Total cost to the City is estimated at $313,500. Little or no cost savings would be expected to accrue to the County. Services: Water There are five water purveyors in the annexation as proposed. The City of Seattle serves the area north of the alignment of South 112th . Street and west of East Marginal Way, South. Water District No. 25 serves in the Allentown Area, and Water District No. 125 covers the area west of the Duwamish River and the small area on the east side of the Beacon Coal Mine Road. The Creston Water Assoc. serves a small area within Subarea No. 2. Seattle also provides service along the west side of Empire Way South and the City of Tukwila serves a home and several businesses in Subarea No. 3. Most of the study area south of the Boeing Access Road, is within the Skyway Coordinated Water Supply Plan Boundary. The Plan was developed to simplify the varied water purveyor boundaries and resolve the resulting problems. These purveyors receive water from the Seattle system. They serve varying pressure gradients requiring pump stations and pressure reducing valves. There are distribution mains in all developed portions of the annexation. Subarea No. 3 is largely undeveloped and unserved. District No. 25, serving in the Allentown portion of Subarea No. 2, has facilities which are outdated and inadequate. To bring them up to standard, a new 8 inch main and three fire hydrants would be needed. The Skyway Plan recommends that future service to this area be provided by Seattle. Tukwila states in the FEIS that the City would take responsibility for most of the Districts' service area. (A small part is served by Water District No. 125.) The City does not intend to upgrade the system unless there is a health hazard or property owners request an upgrade and, presumably, would be willing to pay for it. The Creston Water Association serves 15 homes in the northern portion of Subarea No. 2 using a 2" main parallel to an existing 8" Seattle line. The Skyway Plan again recommends service to this area by Seattle, which provides service in the area surrounding the Association. The remaining existing water systems are adequate to serve current and planned uses. Most of the improvements that could be required involve retrofitting existing systems to make appropriate connections to the Tukwila system, should the City elect to serve all or portions of the annexed area. Following annexation, Tukwila could proceed under the statutes to take over these service areas. Subarea No. 3 is within Renton's Comprehensive Water Plan and it has been reported that service in that area by Tukwila would be unduly expensive because of the required crossing of the railroad. Services: Sewerage Sewer service in the annexation is provided by Seattle, Val Vue Sewer District, Skyway Sewer District, and the City of Renton. Some areas are still relying upon septic tanks. Seattle serves most of Subarea No. 1 and Subarea No. 2, and additional areas between Empire Way and the Burlington- Northern Railroad. Val Vue serves two areas: one west and southwest of the Boeing Access Road and the other lying west of Interurban Avenue, South. Skyway serves a small area in Subarea No. 3 as does the City of Renton. Most of Subarea No. 3 is without sewer service, as is PAGE SIX - TUKWILA /P.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the Allentown area. The portions of the annexation area which are served are generally receiving adequate service. St: veral homes along 49th Ave., So. have access to sewers but have never connected. Connection could be required if a health problem develops. Most of Empire Way, So. is not currently served. Septic tanks are in use in that area and some problems exist. Subarea No. 3 is generally within Renton's Comprehensive Sewer Plan and it is expected that Renton will initiate annexation proceedings in the near future. Sewers would thereby be made available following application and creation of a Local Improvement District by. the property owners. The Allentown area has the most significant sewage disposal problems. The industrial areas in Allentown have sewers provided by Seattle, Tukwila and Val Vue, but the homes rely upon septic systems and there have been a number of reported overflows. The County will not now allow septic systems on lots smaller than 12,500 square feet, and many of the lots in the Allentown area are much smaller. It is in a low -lying area close to the river which has a high water table. Sewers are reportedly needed in the Allentown residential area. Following annexation, a system could be installed (presumably at property owners' expense) under the City's jurisdiction. The City has indicated it does not plan a system there unless the citizens request it or unless there is a health hazard identified by the Seattle -King County Health Department. A sewer system in the Allentown area would cost an estimated $1,180,000. Following annexation, Tukwila could contract with Seattle to continue providing service and simply allow Val Vue and Skyway to continue to serve in their respective areas. Additionally, Tukwila could assume all or part of those areas in accordance with state statutes. Tukwila would have responsibility for sewerage in the areas which are currently not served. Financial Effects: Tukwila The assessed valuation of the entire annexation area would be approximately $469 million. This includes $375 million from Subarea No. 1, $8 million from Subarea No. 2, $70 million from Subarea 4 and $15 million from Subarea No. 3. As modified, the annexation includes slightly in excess of $453 million in assessed value. This is nearly $334,000 per capita, which is in the range of ten times the County average. Surprisingly, there is not a substantial excess of revenues over required expenditures. The City reports that operation and maintenance for the General Fund and Street Fund would be $1,510,000; annual revenues would range from $1,945,000 to $2,157,000, resulting in net revenues that would range from $434,500 to $647,000 annually. However, the City estimates that approximately $12,920,000 in capital costs will be required in the annexation area, of which $4,760,000 would be incurred within the first five years. If that $4,760,000 was financed by twenty -year 7.50% municipal bonds, the annual debt service would be $460,000, wiping out the net revenue for the low -end estimate. That provides no funds for the remaining $8,160,000 in required capital costs, nor does it allow any funding for the 16th Ave. South Bridge. According to the City, taxes paid by homeowners for general municipal services (road district, library district, fire district, etc.) would drop from $3.54 per $1,000 assessed valuation to $2.88. This would create a annual savings of $33 on a $50,000 home. The total tax burden for the area annexed would be reduced by approximately $300,000 annually. More than half of that reduction would be incurred by the Library District. Total 1987 property taxes within the City of Tukwila were $11.97 per $1,000. The rate within Fire District No. 1 ranged from $12.39 to $12.63 per $1,000. The PAGE SEVEN - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv. /Hod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 City's legal capdcity for bonded indebtedness is now $22 million and will be increased to $30 million as a result of the annexation. Financial Effects: King County It is estimated that annual savings accruing to the County as a result of annexation could be approximately $725,000: Revenues Lost Current Expense Revenues Road District Revenues Total Revenues Lost: Savings Incurred C .1.P. Annual Average Debt Service - Bridge (50%) . Current Expense Fund Savigs Road District Savings Total Savings Incurred Annual Expenditures CIP Annual Average Debt Service - Bridge 000%) C.E. Expenditures Road District Expenses Tota 1 Expenditures Net Annual ( loss) $ 729,500 685,000 567,000 1,450,000 44,000 79,000 Annua 1 Revenues Current Expense Revenue $ 729,500 Road District Revenues 685,000 Total Revenues 567,000 2,900,000 44,000 79,000 PAGE EIGHT - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv./Mod. Add.) ($1,414,500) $2,140,000 Net Annual Savings $ 725,500 Current Expense savings would be incurred primarily on police staffing for traffic enforcement, plus some in parks maintenance. Debt service on the bridge is based upon the assumption that replacement would cost $30 million financed by 20 -year 7.5% bonds and that King County would pay one -half of the annual debt service. The $567,000 is based upon the $3.4 million now budgeted in the Six Year Capital Improvement Program. If the annexation does not take place, cost to the County will be much higher. assuming the full cost of the bridge would be borne by the County: $ 1,414,500 $ 3,590,000 ($ 2,175,500) This estimate includes only Current Expense and Road District expenditures directly attributable to the area. If services such as assessments, planning, and other administrative activities were added the amounts would be higher. 16th Avenue South Bridge The bridge is an unusual bascule -type, constructed so that the leaves retract while being raised. It is 58 years old and has a cracked footing under one of the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PAGE NINE - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) piers. The piling supporting one end of the bridge is reportedly inadequate and one pier shifts slightly as a result of earthquakes, such as occurred in 1964. This causes the leaves to become misaligned. Adjustments are necessary, but the maximum extent of such adjustments is limited. The bridge could fail due to a substantial earthquake. Because of its age and the requirement that it be manned by a tender, annual cost for maintenance and operation has been estimated to be as high as $500,000. The cost to replace the bridge has been estimated at $30,000,000 for a similar new operating structure. It is evident from the maps that the bridge carries traffic which originates in the City of Seattle. Tukwila and unincorporated areas. It is likely that some significant percentage is generated by the Boeing Company and other industrial installations in the annexation area. Both the County and the City acknowledge that the bridge is properly a regional facility and its responsibility should be shared by several agencies, perhaps even including the Port of Seattle due to the apparent need for an operating structure to accommodate the waterway. An attempt was made by King County and Tukwila to negotiate an agreement for sharing responsibility for this bridge. It is not surprising that the attempt was unsuccessful. First, there is insufficient information to support an agreement. The cost of the bridge cannot be determined because the nature of the structure required is unknown. The Coast Guard determines the height clearance above the waterway. It is possible that a fixed bridge could be installed. The cost of a fixedbridge (according to testimony) would be substantially less than $30 million. If a fixed bridge were permitted, (and assuming that both its cost and operation would be far less than current costs), it might be wise to replace this bridge prior to failure. The money now being spent for maintenance and operation, if applied to 20 -year, 7.5% municipal bonds, would amortize costs of $5,000,000. Furthermore, the indirect costs born by commuters and others resulting from unexpected failure of the bridge could be extraordinary. In any case, an agreement between the responsible parties will require considerably more information. Secondly, it will be necessary to involve all of the responsible parties. It is unfair to expect that the County and Tukwila will bear the total cost of the bridge. Much of the traffic the bridge carries is clearly to and from the City of Seattle. Seattle now has no motive to share in the cost of the bridge. However, contemplation of the results of failure might change the City's attitude. The advantage to participating in a planned replacement rather than an emergency replacement could be great. The debt service on a $30 million replacement structure (at 7.5% over 20 -vears amortized) would be $2.9 million annually. BOUNDARY MODIFICATIONS Boundary modifications herein enacted are addressed in three categories. First is the deletion of territory in Subarea No. 3 as requested by Renton. The second is the addition of territory in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge. The third is a collection of small additions, deletions and clarifications to correct tax lot splits, islands, and similar problems which resulted from the use of the Fire District No. 1 corporate boundary. A number of maps have been attached to this annexation to illustrate the changes. They are incorporated herein and made a part hereof by the following references. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16th Avenue South Bridge Addition PAGE TEN - TUKWILA /P.D. /1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) Subarea No. 3 Deletion The Draft Environmental Impact Statement describes alternatives I, IA and II. This decision most closely approximates Alternative II, but includes all lands northeast of the river, while deleting Subarea 3. It differs from Alternative II by including the area east of 1 -5 in the vicinity of the Boeing Access Road and 49th Ave., South. According to the DEIS, deletion of Subarea 3 would be consistent with the logical extension of the City of Renton as recognized by the Renton - Tukwila boundary adjustment agreement. The Board has examined that document and concurs. The common boundary in this area can, and should be, a continuation of the east right -of -way line of the Burlington- Northern railroad. Statements by Renton indicate that annexation by that City is probable and desirable. The Board herein encourages Renton to pursue annexation as quickly as possible due to the fire protection issue previously described. Both cities acknowledge that Renton is the logical provider of sewer service in Subarea 3. Renton currently serves the 250 apt. Empire Estates Complex on Empire Way, So. The Skyway Critical Water Supply Study and the FEIS indicate that water service by Renton would be appropriate. Tukwila has indicated that it can best provide fire protection and will do so by contract if requested by Renton. Utility service by Tukwila in this area would be difficult because of the substantial cost incurred for crossing the railroad. Most of Subarea No. 3 is in Renton's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Sewerage Plan. The majority of Subarea No. 3 is physically removed from Tukwila and oriented to Renton due to the physical boundary created by the railroad. Also, steep slopes both physically and visually separate the area from Tukwila. The mayors of the two cities have agreed by memorandum to support an interlocal agreement which would, among other things, establish a joint agreement between Renton and Tukwila requesting deletion of Subarea No. 3. The legal description attached to this decision deletes - that portion of Subarea No. 3 lying east of the right- of -wa■ line of the Burlington- Northern Railroad and south of the converging right -of -way lines of Empire Way South and Interstate 5. The annexation as submitted would have created an isolated service island of unincorporated King County surrounded by Seattle and Tukwila, and divided by the river. This area is generally described as lying north of the extension of South Director Street. Maintenance, operation and policing of the abbreviated road system there would have remained a County responsibility, necessitating access through two cities. Tukwila, in its FEIS, states that the Duwamish River constitutes a natural boundary for the northern portion of the annexation and, further, that it would not be logical to extend annexation to the area west of the river. The City lists four options for dealing with the island created: A. Tukwila could annex only the area east of the Duwamish and north to the City limits of Seattle. As proposed by the City, the bridge should be left within one jurisdiction only. B. The boundaries of the annexation area could be extended to also include 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the unincorporated land west of the Duwamish. This option would ignore the natural boundary provided by the river and would create an awkward division of jurisdiction between Seattle and Tukwila, with Tukwila having jurisdiction of a small area west of the river and having access only via 16th Avenue South. C. The northwestern boundary could be established just south of 16th Avenue South between the river and Seattle's city limits. This would also leave an island, but simply a smaller one. Additionally, the bridge would remain entirely the responsibility of King County. D. The boundaries could remain essentially unchanged from those provided in the legal description. The boundary as filed would establish Tukwila's corporate limits generally along the east bank of the Duwamish River. The Surface Water Management Division of King County Department of Public Works takes the position that it is essential that the area annexed include the entire riverbank area to provide for proper bank stabilization and maintenance in one jurisdiction. The Division claims that the entire river in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge should be annexed by one jurisdiction in'order to provide for adequate maintenance and operation of the bridge. The Board agrees as to the centerline of the river. Furthermore, testimony indicates that state law provides that city jurisdiction is interpreted as extending to the centerline of the river. However, the argument in favor of one entity having jurisdiction over the bridge must be balanced with the need for financial equity and other considerations. The Division argues on Page 49 of the FEIS that all flood protection, bank stabilization, and river - related maintenance activities in the affected areas should become the responsibility of Tukwila. The Board concurs and assumes that establishment of the boundary at the centerline or thread of the river will accomplish that objective. The Board agrees that the annexation boundary should be extended southerly and westerly to the thread of the Duwamish River, and that the annexation should be further modified by extension northerly to include all unincorporated lands lying east of the thread of the river and north of the annexation boundaries as presented. This modification will have several effects. First, it will substantially eliminate an impractical and illogical service area for King County. The island is not totally eradicated, leaving a small portion of South Park surrounded by the river and the City of Seattle. In our opinion, this area is part of the Seattle community and logical service area. Annexation to Tukwila would be impractical. Although testimony indicated that annexation of this area by Seattle is not likely in the near term, the Board is hopeful that it will someday be accomplished. Placing the bridge within two jurisdictions will create some management and operation difficulties which will require the cooperation of the City and the County to resolve. King County has operated this bridge for many years and has the skilled and experienced personnel to continue to do so. It is strongly recommended that the County continue in this role and that the City and the County formalize the arrangement and share the operation and maintenance costs on an equal basis. As previously discussed, it is premature to expect an agreement among all of the appropriate agencies and parties as to the long -term solution to the bridge. As an interim measure, the Board has two objectives. One is to avoid, as much as PAGE ELEVEN - TUKWILA /F.D. 01 (Apv. /Uod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 possible, a serious economic inequity. The other is to maintain or create a situation most conducive to future negotiation and agreement. It is the opinion of the Board that annexing all of the territory except the bridge would place an inappropriate burden upon the County. The opposite is also true. Foisting total responsibility upon Tukwila for an acknowledged regional facility would be inequitable, even with the substantial amount of assessed valuation to be obtained by Tukwila. As can be seen in the fiscal analysis, the City will probably have a negative cash flow as a result of the annexation even without the added cost of replacement of the bridge. Should Tukwila be saddled with even as much as one -half of the debt service necessary to pay for a $30 million replacement, the negative fiscal effects on the City would be substantial and would require contributions well in excess in revenues stemming from the annexation. Under the existing situation the only governmental entity which has real motivation to solve the bridge problem is King County. Following annexation, both the County and the City will necessarily be involved, and it is hoped that a multiagency sharing of the responsibility might result. Islands and Tax Lot Splits I. North Boeing Building: This large building is situated on the west side of East Marginal Way South, and is already divided by the Seattle corporate limits and the old Fire District No. 1 boundary. There is no way to eliminate a tax lot division but it is possible to avoid an additional boundary passing through the property. Expansion of the boundary northerly to the Seattle limits (see discussion of 16th Avenue South Bridge Addition, Page Ten) will place approximately ninety percent of this building in Tukwila. It is hoped that Tukwila and Seattle might accomplish a boundary adjustment to delete the balance of this property from Seattle and annex it to Tukwila. (See Exhibit B.) II. Associated Grocers: This p ►operty is located along the west side of Martin Luther King Way So. (Empire Way So.) just north of the Boeing Access Road. It is partially in the City of Seattle. Again, it is not possible to avoid a tax lot split but it is hoped that a boundary adjustment between the two cities can be accomplished. This decision does not amend the boundary as filed. (See Exhibit C.) M. 51st Avenue South: The City of Seattle corporate boundary divides several tax lots and follows the centerline of 51st Avenue South in this vicinity. This creates two problems. First, a state statute prohibits the use of street centerlines as boundaries and the boundary used in this annexation is therefore reduced to the internal margin of the street. This decision deletes from the Tukwila annexation the balance of the divided lots. The evidence indicates that the houses on those lots are within the City of Seattle, while small, undeveloped portions of the lots are currently unincorporated. Future annexation of these small parcels by the City of Seattle is encouraged. (See Exhibit 1D.) IV. 56th Place South: The Fire District No. 1 boundary divides approximately five lots. Portions are within PAGE TWELVE - TUKWILA /F.D. #I(Apv. /Mod.Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the annexation, and portions would remain unincorporated. Deletion of the area lying east of . Martin Luther King Way South (Empire Way South) in this vicinity will avoid the division of tax lots and establish a physical, logical boundary. (See Exhibit E.) V. Rainier National Bank: This property is located between East Marginal Way South and Interurban Avenue South. The property would be divided by the annexation. According to testimony, the bank would prefer to be annexed. The balance of the bank property is contained in the aforementioned Riverton Annexation. Because that annexation has already been filed, no change is made by this decision. (See Exhibit F.) VI. Island of Lots 7, 8, & 9, Block 22, Hillman Gardens: This island is totally surrounded by the annexation. It is added to the annexation. (See Exhibit G.) VII. Island at Airport Way: Railroad right -of -way, Interstate 5 right -of -way and Airport Way South right -of -way would become an island tetween Seattle and Tukwila. It is the decision of the Board that this island be allowed in preference to creating an illogical service area, which would result from a small portion of Airport Way being located in Tukwila with the balance in Seattle. It is hoped that the City of Seattle will annex the area. (See Exhibit H.) VIII. Island at 9120 East Marginal Way South: This island is totally surrounded by the annexation and is added by this decision. (See Exhibit I.) IX. 42nd Avenue South and Interurban Avenue South: Small portions of both streets at their intersection w luld be left out of the City of Tukwila whereas the remaining portions of the street in this vicinity would be within the City. This would create an irregular boundary and illogical service area. Consequei tly, this area is added to the annexation. (See Exhibit J.) OBJECTIVES This decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County tends to accomplish the pertinent objectives specified in RCW 36.93.180. The particularly significant objectives in this proposal are as follows: 1) Preservation of Natural Neighborhoods and Communities: This approval will permit the voters of the Allentown and Duwamish neighborhoods to determine if they wish to join the City of Tukwila. If they do so they will carry with them sufficient assessed valuation to enable the City to provide needed services and capital improvements. A number of municipal services would be improved or made available, including police protection, parks, and sanitary sewers. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(1). 2) Use of Physical Boundaries: The annexation makes extensive use of the PAGE THIRTEEN - TUKWILA /P.D. #1(Apv. /Mod.Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Duwamish River and Martin Luther KIng Way South (Empire Way South), 51st Avenue South, and other streets. This decision tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(2). 3) Creation and Preservation of Logical Service Areas: The annexation as modified restores to the City of Renton territory which properly should be served by that City in accordance with previous agreements and comprehensive plans. Tukwila is capable of providing municipal services, particularly police protection, at appropriate levels in the balance of the area. The City may or may not opt to assume responsibility for utility services where it has an opportunity to do so. Should the City decide to pursue that option, the question would in most circumstances come before the Boundary Review Board. Consequently, it is not addressed in detail in this resolution. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the pertinent objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(3). 4) Prevention of Abnormally Irregular Boundaries: The Board has attempted to balance the need for regular boundaries with the desire to avoid creating uneconomical islands between Tukwila and Seattle and other boundary irregularities. Also, the western boundary is amended to follow the thread of the Duwamish River. While the river is not regular in all senses of the word, it is certainly a recognizable boundary. The balance of the western boundary will likely be expanded westward by future annexations which will eliminate any minor irregularities created in this action. The addition of territory in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue bridge will eliminate a boundary irregularity which would create service difficulties as well as a fiscal inequity. The deletion of Subarea No. 3 not only is consistent with previous agreements and adopted comprehensive• plans, but will further establish a regular and recognizable boundary between Renton and Tukwila. Under ideal circumstances, the Boundary Review Board might select to place all territory east of I -5 in the City of Seattle. However, to delete that area in its entirety from this annexation would create a major service problem for King County with no assurance that it would be resolved in the future. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(4). 5) Adjustment of Impractical Boundaries: The Board has implemented a number of adjustments to the proposed boundary. The use of the corporate limits of King County Fire Protection District No. 1, which predated the freeway and other improvements, created a number of problems. To the extent of its authority, the Board has modified the boundary to ameliorate these problems. The logic of the adjustments should be self- evident upon examination of the maps and comments contained elsewhere in this decision. The same is true in the area of the territorial addition in the vicinity of the 16th Avenue South bridge. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objective specified in RCW 36.93.180(5). 6) Annexation to Cities of Unincorporated Areas which are Urban in Character: Established land uses, zoning, governmental infrastructure and all pertinent comprehensive plans indicate plainly that this area is urban in character. This decision therefore tends to accomplish the objectives specified in RCW 36.93.180(8). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY THAT, for the above reasons, the action proposed in the Notice of Intention contained in said File No. 1450 be, and the same is, hereby approved as modified by the addition and deletion of territory PAGE FOURTEEN - TUKWILA /F.D. #1 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 as evidenced by the legal description which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. ADOPTED BY SAID BOARD by a vote of 7 in favor and 0 against this 8th day of September, 1988, and signed by me in authentication of its said adoption on said date. FILED by me this 4 day of September, 1988 G.B C , Executive Secretary PAGE FIFTEEN - TUKWILA /F.D. 11 (Apv. /Mod. Add.) WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING COUNTY GUNBJO SANDVIK, Chair FILE NO. 14k TUKWILA/F.D. #1 EXHIBIT A Page Sixteen August 31, 1988 • » >Rev. 9- 7 -88«< LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION (Fire District 01 Revised) • BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 °17'40" E 868.00 feet more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,-00.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet more or less to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said Westerly margin of Airport Way South to the East line of said Section 33; Thence Southerly along said East line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line and continuing Southerly along said Seattle City Limit Line and the East line of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M. to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said 104th Street which is also the Seattle City Limit Line to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way south); Thence South along said Easterly boundary and Seattle City Limit Line 620.00 feet more or less to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street (also known as S. Ryan Way); Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin and FILE NO. 1450 "UK WILA/F.D. #1 Page Seventee Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 11 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>REV. 9 7 Seattle City Limit Line to the intersection of the East Line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision and Seattle City Limit Line 940.00 feet, more or less to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the North line cf the Southeast quarter of said Section 3; Thence East along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the West margin of 51st Avenue S.; Thence South along said margin to the centerline of South 112th Street, being on the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along said West margin of 51st Avenue South 452 feet more or lass, to an intersection with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street and Seattle City Limit Line to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Southerly on the West side of said lot and Seattle City Limit Line to the North line of South 114th Street, sometimes called August Street, as platted in said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line and Seattle City Limit Line to the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the South margin of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th.Street; Thence East along said South margin and its Easterly extension approxi- / o Fe4- - •v 5orf'l.. .�us+' M . i v% d4 F—..+p∎Is t. u S' matey Page Eighteen FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88«< ---_- ■P_--; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to its intersel- td64 It /h +- o -WO../ Iivnt. 04 SR. e.ael 't1,� 1Jo WC CO r►.N t 1 on with the ►t_��.,�_�L _r , ... « - f - ox l + 0182Oo o 195, Sari -oi•.4 b... �u.rft,tr de��:• �s l arproximaial 310 --- it'41n ot i t c. m t su red aloe Sci F.a.sf Ra�t,k -,, Li:,c. ■* SR •s): Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersec- tion with the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing along said Easterly Right -of -Way Line of State Road 5 to an intersection with the Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line of the Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Pacific Coast Railroad); Thence South t% al on said Northeasterly Right-of-Way Line to an A 9 Y 9 Y intersection with the North line of the Southeast /4 of said Section 14; Thence continuing along said Northeasterly Right -of -Way Line to an intersection with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101, said line being also the existing Tukwila PILE NO. 145 d� UKWILA/F.D. #1 Page Nineteen -4- Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 >>>Rev. 9- 7 -88«< City Limit Line; Thence Westerly along said extension and Tukwila City Limit Line to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of Deeds, Records of King County, said line being also the existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence Northwesterly along said margin and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line and Tukwila City Limit Line 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washir;ton and City Limit Line of Tukwila as established by City Ordinance 494; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River and existing Tukwila City Limit Line; Thence downstream along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in FILE NO. 1451k UKWILA /F.D. #1 Page Twenty Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation (Fire District 01 Revised) August 31, 1988 »>Rev. 9- 7 -88«< -5- Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Tukwila City Limit Line and Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread and Tukwila City Limit Line 2,150.00 feet, more or less, to an angle point in the Tukwila City Limit Line and the East margin of 42nd Avenue South; Thencs Southerly along said East margin and city limits 400 feet more or less to an angle point on the city limits of Tukwila; Thence Northwesterly along said City Limit Line of Tukwila tc; the West margin of said 42nd Avenue South; Thence Northerly along said margin to the Westerly line of Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 1030 feet more or less to a point of intersection with the Easterly exten- sion of the South line of Tract 22, of Riverside Interurban Tracts; as recorded in Vol. 10, page 74 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence West along said South line and extersion to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; as recorded in Vol. 13, page 36 of Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of,Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said thread of the Duwamish River, and waterway, to the North line of Section 32, Township 24, Range 4 East, W.M., said point being also on the Seattle City Limit Line; Thence Easterly along said North line and the North line of said Section 23 and said Seattle City Limit Line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. FILE NO. 1450- ?"'iK WILA ? F.D. #1 Page Twenty -OL .. c Legal Description for City Of Tukwila - Proposed Annexation '(Fire :District 11 Revised) August 31, 1988 >>>Rev. 9- 7 -88«< recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; —' �.∎ •5L;11 A3 tie; '� - -q WP :(ES)P5 -6- '71'!ii Phi) ¶1=111•11::a •• ,s 0 A I.44 AL. ❑ AURELIO 0E5IMONE TL.6/ EASEMENT r0 CITY OF 5EArrLE FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /P.D. #1 Exhibit C Page Twenty -Three r[ i0! Fire ' istrict #1 B ndary Gov't. Lot 1 Rte 31.77 Acres ' I g re. Iry a 11.7 L-/Z IV" i o f ' �3 ' f"1 ' 4 • t o — c 1 I — •� . • O I I I 1 2 U 158 - - _. N ? :1 • X59 f b 1 0 9) \ 1, PILE NO. 145 0 - TUK WILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit D Page Twenty -Four • • • v'\ \ \\ \ 5 is 6. 410 �N. I, III I r 91.r 9 N e • 301 L9i 29! 271 • • • • • • I I , 1 7 1 86) t 87 26 I 4 2 ■ FILE NO. 1450 - TUKWI'.A /F.D. #1 Exhibit E Page Twenty -Five ▪ 0 • 0• • • ' O 5.. 1 ,,, I23 w .1 L 12AI I ▪ a 1 rc tip.. /.O :PEN _ 1 - � / `.\ v v " 7 D 1 , 35 ; ' ' ; 11 1 ,i I 3� 1s 1111:1 10, It M/ .V 60 •31 29 :7 :' " 16 / s x"8 L /NE • u / 129 1 p �01 p � a VI 1 • r' 1T:31 N ` zz1'1+r AC 61 a u a (A) \ (9; S.P. 791-124 (0) 1 (C cy _ } J. .L.12 $ :oa,,e = 0 Cam. C1. C 9, • .L • 25 10 24 • 11 (2 1 13 i iS 16 17 W: )9 120 121 ,; _2 .�. , r • 74 1 I 1 423 -*i i "i ' .,1��, r ,..! 4 24 ` ', S 120 . (N/irh(. sro t S /2 .3" C t 1051 RAVERSO gyp ---- - 115 •• Ii eo r .25 — 1 7 1 6. 1S117, 10 -mum alloE (p*Aro IN 33 sj • 2 32 3 j 30 ' .5 1- ---rt— Z9 .1 6 X 28 7 27 •' t 8 26.14 . 1. to �4 NOR7N L /NE OF C.C. L EW7S MI M — — VACA r 4.• _ __. tor. . :sf . - I •:.:. . _.l�:r : "�_ i__c.,_ iv 23 1 12, a . r.•:.�.,� . _ _ .... ; �� ' 22 ' Ii I7 1 13 "as 4. •. .:.a, '2� -: j _ . _ .,,. 00 2 ti1T. 'J) eI '} \Ste. N OP £ N F1L1 NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit P Page Twenty -Six t7ONATION ric 1 2 ' _ - 2! } O c:, "- c r., 99 ?. ' 12sj1 \ • ::a c.1• 4 32 5 / /STU ST1 (Af,VKSN/Rf T - WOM OM M OM ati n B r• r ■ I a IJ7 l ,•U 1C1 0 1 45 ` A I rn,, l • 280 1;1 „,„ ,Q 1 I A 100 } 1 I A 0 so EN la 4e - -- —71r, �o /� +r5 ▪ CO 1 JC '� c i ' 40 I 09 - .,4 el pt 46i4S1 4i 40'39136137 36 3SI>4I33132'3113d2912AIZ7126Z% // H • _ p, A- j' „(.wN s s) a )SW o RIGHT or Boi 7 1. 716.36 24.70 Acres . 5 "RUCK PARTS .9 AC /YER . I. ' V 6 7 , 14 4 ( m- I 27 LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 41 ' 33 I i-,31 1 36 i ' 35 V 1 , :r. J - ;V r l.. • VI AY .r 115TH • et olk — 7- t. -- 1112 II "eice 51- w w� G� • nr ' -ca rnv't I of 7 W - - INTERURBAN TRAPYS " 4 , a19 - , 2G - - Lot 5 \ ` Z Y L' H ONO eMa a• • 8 (1E0 sr) re • J :'s... f 2!r1 -_ 1 T r - - 210.7 Cat FILE NO. 1450- TUKWILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit G Page Twenty -Seven - 1 _9 - • . .el•••• C ' 3 2 773 C 1. 81,o, tt Q �o LOWS • an • e � O cr ,.i u' m TER lob GAS • ss V 3 `o+ SHO E'�nF I Ar b+ 10e O s i N ! � 10!/46 . A.,&1 a ul, FIAT$ ?ONI 'VISION 114* •40I0ING1 CGNOI.INIO r® 16.53 AI tACT 4 J � , ACIR SO. LN. NO LN. M o O O T R. 2-' �G t 1u . T 2 IN1►O•I- ACT 2 o A 0 AC - .— -I�- -- R E' S ASSELT 0 L.0 N0. 50_ eNATT 0. L. C. NO. 38 l X100 ✓•r ,IIPI /I IAUC1 :Ilt• Na 39 �'" —'..•� - -- ..l YW ALI' a C 4 Fi / /os .,we .r. anr�� t siv FILE NO. 1450- TUK WILA /F.D. #1 Exhibit 1 Page Twenty -Nine ORTIO OF TRACT 6, T ,O„0 - ::::::0 • 7 1:0 N v o , c- • • J \CS r TRH •cr 1 •11rt 13 1 4, • e ' x o 1v t' �9L • s 10 z� bp -- ��z =1=1: c N I -2,-2819t. 4 22 14 J • 1113R5A0 6-49 -11 E 593 04 Atvoivt70g 6.750do.4'd 0 '0 N o) N ?S 0 LAO 44. • • :1 2 0 1 W 01 v 1 O d if 1. �t • 1 • " L • ollI • 11 • u4 • ?:I ' !'1; , -' 1• i � • )QA i f .j � I . . it t 171. y ca m 4T ), 4 i- • 3 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 IZ06) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: John McFarland, City Administrator FROM: Ross Earnst, Director of Public Works DATE: September 7, 1988 SUBJECT: Fire District #1 Annexation Meeting We met with Rex Knight and Doug Mattoon of King County Public Works on September 6 to discuss public works annexation items. This memo describes the items discussed. 16TH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE Rex explained that their budget proposal from Administration to the Council will include: $250,000 - For maintenance and operation (shared 50/50) $150,000 - For cleaning and painting (100% County) $150,000 - For soil boring at the north pier (100% County) - -- - 50/50 share on ensueing costs The County is pursuing federal bridge funds for the bridge and would expect any local matching funds to be equally shared. INTERURBAN AVENUE BRIDGE This 3.5 million dollar project is under construction with completion expected in the summer of 1989. All funding is in place and none to be asked from Tukwila. EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH (112th Street to Boeing Access Road) The County has budgeted $700,000 of "local" funds for this project. The project has PS &E completed. It was explained that the Council pulled similar funding on an arterial that Kirkland annexed. Costs for undergrounding power could raise the cost by $250,000 or more. Access agreements on the west side are going to require extensive work. The County is in the right -of -way phase and to date have been unsuccessful. They will turn this over to use if not completed by annexation. ATTACHMENT B John McFarland Memorandum September 7 ,1988 Page 2 Surface water interlocal agreements were briefly addressed as were the fourteen traffic signals. Doug Mattoon will get with a breakdown of the $250,000 M &O .costs and that will be forwarded to you. RC /kjr CC: Mayor Rick Beeler and 35S3C4 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING A MODIFIED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council in Resolution 1036, previously expressed support for the proposed annexation and expressed an intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the City Council, in Resolution 1079, passed July 5, 1988, reconfirmed approval of annexation of the area known as Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area subject to final determination of the boundary by the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the Boundary Review Board has now determined and approved a modified boundary for the annexation area which decision will be signed in written form on September 8, 1988; WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the matter placed on the ballot for the November 8, 1988, election, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area as modified by the King County Boundary Review Board which area is shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and legally on Exhibit B attached hereto both of which exhibits are incorporated herein, and requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held on November 8, 1988, within the proposed annexation area, on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall upon annexation become subject to said zoning and land use regulations. Page 1 ATTACHMENT C Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR FETING ON THE S DAY OF , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: - )// ,� (-I t0` mss. CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 9,4,„ , FIL 4 WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: /Z277 By 3553C3 WIN C UNCIL PRESIDENT, MABEL J. HARRIS 1 , J1:111111 1 111111111111111111;11I.1iii ,1110 11111,„,,„, FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION $TUDY Modified FIRE DISTINCT #1 Annexation Boundary Proposed Fire District # 1 Boundary I 111111411111.111111•_,IIIMIIINSIINSINSINNIMMINI CCA MON G. °DUMMY'S & asseC.Inc- STALZEN & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIOAJRE WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. IC 7 9 . CITY OF TUKWILA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE PROPOSED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council has in Resolution 1036 previously expressed its support for the proposed annexation and expressed its intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council has caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board currently has the matter under consideration, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the matter placed on the ballot for the November 8, 1988, election, and to accomplish that this resolution must be passed before a final determination has been made by the King County Boundary Review Board, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area and further described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein, and requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held on November 8, 1988, within the proposed annexation area, on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila, subject _to the right to withdraw said resolution depending upon the final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council has previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall upon annexation become subject to said zoning and land use regulations. 3SS3C3 Page 1 ATTACHMENT D Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE 6th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: 3553C4 COUNCIL PRESIDENT, MABEL J. HARRIS Page 2 • s. =m.o.= Fir• District #1 Boundary EXHIBIT B RATIONS """ b :LANNI ,,„•- 1.'"•••:1.11.l ?. -ii.11.1211111114 'CM .C4'1.111.! -migillaw#61111111116 1453ali,r41 r 1 .7 f11111111 frk ft B. t • . ■;.-. .: , ' IMil %i", ■ , "' ' • iP ' k fq . .:::-."'•••■ : I: _ ' •J L' r '` moo- , , , ." , .....\,..... --, :„ .' ..,.. .-. , =,.. .. J.-L.,........ , ..,... :.., ■ , TOPOGRAPHICAL. MA P 0' DRAINAGE BASINS = FIRE DISTRICT 1 1. BOUNDARY 31 P1247141011.0va"- - :' 13 %-% PISIRICT 1 -wATg PISTRIcT • POWER GEVI(E. AA e()(1NGARY 131Z8 eu-hecis FIRE mds P t qot KING COUNTY ASSESSOR =ate 1317.31 - S 2L 9 .9.99 .as., o 5 ST )"s, 'Lk _IT___ rT \rty cis‘ 0'3 N II -23- �.1 09 4 1_,IB •• L6 34.62 J 14 ,ieg 1J10. 2 Toat 1 l� 1 a 3 1 o 1 .j I z � i. to • • iopQ 1_ 8 l ' %1 e /S •Q 1 01 o IN �0 /73/ 1 . 4 0 i 4. t ,1 • • -^'N • 'AV • 4 tft 4 , • R te' i • • r' ... ��_•, .J 1 ' q t y ' �.�. -�` ! j a t •1 rr L 47 0924- 4 • • .,. yy" tr- • • V ... e Iat - r 2 - 41854 r ice .�. (!t+ r ! 4 r j {� {per ---. : :fi { If o792 0 ' . eie t , 'ffp / I • S 4. 1 • • " M f-, J 1I - - e . •.v w „ =3 4 . i A. • 14r34 7' --- . -i:. ' t o 960 4 C • 1 -9 09 G. /a 1 3 0 y Y it -- 0 910 % 4 0 41 1 1 rirc iJ /JO 0• ._60 I 0 916 0 l o . / 0 0 990 \• - i 4 III 11 I1 1 I� 1 111 I� . I �������� � 4 l .i'IIII I� __. 111111 {II II � �IIIIIIIIIp -- � 3 ntj � 1` � {Ill�l .�II'iiiil IIIIIIIII � II' • II IUI 11 � Ho � •,, ..nu111uIlII I VIII IIII1IHI I� �� II I I h l i, I� " IP il 1 1IIIii� il,l 1 � 1111 I�11I1 I II ' ' ll� !I I 1;1ill hl �.S FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY T NORTH CCA ine HUGH G. Gal:warm A AOSOC.IJUC• STALZER i ASSOCIATES TDA INC. FIGURE J it h O r PEN 0' fASfMCNT III 7/ /33.2! /OO 99. 3 19 I 1161 )V //99/ (0) 79 ILS •.� s�. • • .1 ' \ / "• \ \ \ \ \ \ i • \ M \ Z \ -. -- \ . c \ • ° ;901 / P o o c$ T: o`'Q.o . c •• 9 LINE = P v 1 1.A ENNET l • N.f ' DONAT 10 CLAI la cD 445 b1S' 2 1. 0 ICAO' kA 766 /20 16766 • /J0 4G2 598 6O 450 Q155 152 • \ & \ 5 I ����- v!66. / . 0 ti / 0 n / VACA rE a rNOFFMAN ST ) 6JNF OF R TT / ai d ' ct) 0 0.0 7 DOUGLAS G CALVIN 3.07 Ac. 6 ✓o.0 71. 43 is 301 ; Zi = _ s � 50I Sa /28TH ST YS: 41 8 I J 61° 5949 0 47S /JO 157 ' 151 153 65e r.�Cl�iW"..La ±tk`23,L`t s' AZI ti: •'S'rnWE,i1Zl'r'r;t!'h1i:b "i Yez,: Anstvr cxu u..soarsai u•,t iMwRrtxelrr net r.setCaruu:+we,. www-miwiseavc: txxrrA.SCttiONIS1Mizt.tfi it IRR•?W . GBM /pr TO: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary Ref. 4.15.87 IN RE: RESOLUTION AND HEARING DECISION FILE NO. 1450 CITY OF TUKWILA Annexation (K.C.F.P.D. #1) Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S. E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 September 9 , 1988 The Resolution and Hearing Decision of the Washington State Boundary Review Board in and for King County on the above - referenced file is enclosed for filing as prescribed by RCW 36.93.160(4). In order for the proposed action to be finalized, it is now necessary that you file with King County a certified copy of your ordinance or resolution accomplishing this action, together with a copy of this letter, with The Office of the Clerk of the Council, 402 King County Courthouse, Seattle, Washington 98104. If we have denied this proposal, you need do nothing further. XC: CLERK OF THE COUNCIL, ATTN: Helene Mociulski COUNCIL COMMUNITY PLAN & RESOURCES COM. ATTN: . Holly Kean K.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ATTN: Rex Knight K.C. DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS, ATTN: Diane Murdock PARKS, PLANNING El RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ATTN: Mr. James C. Tracy, K.C. DEPARTMENT OF RECORDS AND ELECTIONS E 911 PROGRAM, ATTN: Ms. Noreen Allen THE HONORABLE BOARDS OF COMMISSIONERS: K.C.W.D.s #20, 25, 125 THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL(S): CITIES OF RENTON, SEATTLE SUPERINTENDENTS RENTON S.D. #433;. SO. CENTRAL S.D. #406; SEATTLE S.D. #1 THE HONORABLE BOARDS OF COMMISSIONERS, K.C.F.P.D.s #1, 11, 18, 20 THW HONORABLE BOARDS OF COMMISSIONERS, RAINIER VISTA S.D.; SKYWAY S.D.: VAL VUE S.D. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC HEARING Tuesday August 9, 1988 - 7:30 p.m. Foster High School Cafeteria 4242 South 144th, Seattle The intent of this notice is to inform you of the upcoming important meeting and the possible results from the decision to be made by the Boundary Review Board. King County has requested that the 16th Avenue bridge and surrounding residen- tial area be included in the Fire District No. 1 annexation proposal to Tukwila. The meeting is a continuation of the June 16 meeting. At the first hearing, the City of Tukwila presented the King County Boundary Review Board with its intention to annex Fire District No. 1, positively responding to the petition requesting annexation as proposed by the petitioners. King County Public Works requested that the Boundary Review Board add additional area to the annexation proposal, primarily to include the 16th Avenue Bridge. The bridge would be an expensive addition to service and capital costs for Tukwila; annual costs for maintenance and operation are approximately $250,000. In addition, repair and /or replacement of the bridge is urgently needed, a capital cost which has been estimated at $30 million. The City of Tukwila feels this particular bridge is a regional facility, and that the costs of the bridge should be shared by all users, including King County and Seattle. The Tukwila City Council passed Resolution 1078 stating its agreement to participate with other agencies for its fair share of the costs. Tukwila requested the King County Council to adopt a similar commitment. The Mayor of Tukwila has had on -going discussions with elected King County officials and further meetings will hopefully produce an agreement that can be presented to the Boundary Review Board at the meeting on August 9. It is important for everyone affected by the proposed Fire District No. 1 annexation to Tukwila, to understand that, if the bridge is included without cost sharing, the annexation is in jeopardy. Without regional sharing of costs, Tukwila cannot afford the bridge and would probably not accept the annexation. This is to inform you and to give notice of the meeting on August 9, where the fate of this important annexation may be determined. The Mayor of Tukwila may also request from the BRB, if approved by the City Council, a delay in the pro- ceedings to allow Seattle, Tukwila, King County and other agencies to negotiate and work out an appropriate cost - sharing resolution. This action would postpone the November election into 1989. Please plan to attend. For further information or answers to any questions, please contact Mayor Van Dusen at 433 -1805, or the Tukwila Planning Department at 433 -1849. (26 /FD1.BRBNTC) :m. �.t rS. -ti c�a �• i i #4. E`-. r >fir.,. •.:J.�: rya;::.', :t•+:�i!fi3�T'.?a^•���'!���:.a'• Sera' 1� 0. s. r. Y.., �i. h.,,: i. ,..e'..,�y. ?4'��....+n.�,.,r�iti City of Tukwila 2400 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -7005 1 Office Of The City Attorney JUL ( O6 1040 j CITY OF 'tUKWILA FLANN!Nf C >FP i .�_! Gary Van Dusen, Mayor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Gary: GMH /rj cc. Rick Beeler Ross Earnst Nick Olivas Duane Griffin July 28, 1988 I have not yet received any comments from anyone at our meeting on July 19 at which we discussed a proposed letter to Woody Wilkinson which I wrote in regard to the proposed annexation of certain King County Fire District No. 1 land area. I assume you want us to respond to Wilkinson's earlier letter, but we do not want to do so unless we have had comments and input from the persons who were at the meeting, to be certain that our statements correctly set forth the position of the City. We are prepared to follow through immediately with a response to Wilkinson as soon as we receive your comments, and to structure the response in a way satisfactory to the City. Yours very truly, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Geor.ge, M. `.;Ha 4itig eara � V:e1T 4 `d ga!-W ; Sti a'brZ ,- 4 . .4 ;r447..0,Mixoxrarwsvexmavawea armor uornsor timmes;nmuisaos 474%N. 171 '$ 3 i ° 1 10 3F3! x $£'Z n SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 406 RESOLUTION NO. 417 WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has received requests from residents of unin- corporated King County to'be annexed; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has adopted polioiea that are receptive to annexation; and WHEREAS, the South Central School District has benefited from mutually beneficial partnerahipa and community resources with the City of Tukwila; and WHEREAS, it is desirable for the boundaries of South Central School District to be aligned with the City of Tukwila as a local governmental system; and WHEREAS, the annexation proposals of King County Fire District No. 1, Foster, Riverton and Thorndyke, would favorably increase the amount of South Central School District area into the City of Tukwila; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the South Central School District endorses the annexation proposals of King County Fire District No. 1, Foster, Riverton, and Thorndyke and supports efforta to align the school district's boundaries with the City of Tukwila. PASSED at a regular meeting of the Board of Direotora on July 26, 1988. SOUTH CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 406 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Chairma Directors AUG - 9 1988 k ;:i 1, t wAverage ......n.,.....m..*.v.pa..41.trzwmaorktul,....C.C4.7.54.1q001mti tekVIVAMMI.VMM L W.T.,67airgtItTraag.V■ • AF1,,,,ADAVIT OF DISTak-iBUTION Notice of Public Hearing El Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision Agenda Packet J Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of Project 1-0.4 1- File Number 87-1-A hereby declare that: O Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of Non- • significance Determination of Significance • and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice Other Ei Other 6,Lsei (Mailed to interested parties) Signatu % (V1/ , 19 (26 /FD1.BRBNTC) City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD PUBLIC HEARING Tuesday August 9, 1988 - 7:30 p.m. Foster High School Cafeteria 4242 South 144th, Seattle The intent of this notice is to inform you of the upcoming important meeting and the possible results from the decision to be made by the Boundary Review Board. King County has requested that the 16th Avenue bridge and surrounding residen- tial area be included in the Fire District No. 1 annexation proposal to Tukwila. The meeting is a continuation of the June 16 meeting. At the first hearing, the City of Tukwila presented the King County Boundary Review Board with its intention to annex Fire District No. 1, positively responding to the petition requesting annexation as proposed by the petitioners. King County Public Works requested that the Boundary Review 3oard add additional area to the annexation proposal, primarily to include the 16th Avenue Bridge. The bridge would be an expensive addition to service and capital costs for Tukwila; annual costs for maintenance and operation are approximately $250,000. In addition, repair and /or replacement of the bridge is urgently needed, a capital cost which has been estimated at $30 million. The City of Tukwila feels this particular bridge is a regional facility, and that the costs of the bridge should be shared by all users, including King County and Seattle. The Tukwila City Council passed Resolution 1078 stating its agreement to participate with other agencies for its fair share of the costs. Tukwila requested the King County Council to adopt a similar commitment. Tukwila City Council President Mae Harris and Mayor Gary Van Dusen have had on -going discussions with elected King County officials and further meetings will hope- fully produce an agreement that can be presented to the Boundary Review Board at the meeting on August 9. It is important for everyone affected by the proposed Fire District No. 1 annexation to Tukwila, to understand that, if the bridge is included without cost sharing, the annexation is in jeopardy. Without regional sharing of costs, Tukwila cannot afford the bridge and would probably not accept the annexation. This is to inform you and to give notice of the meeting on August 9, where the fate of this important annexation may be determined. The Mayor of Tukwila may also request from the BRB, if approved by the City Council, a delay in the pro- ceedings to allow Seattle, Tukwila, King County and other agencies to negotiate and work out an appropriate cost - sharing resolution. This action would postpone the November election into 1989. Please plan to attend. For further information or answers to any questions, please contact Mayor Van Dusen at 433 -1805, or the Tukwila Planning Department at 433 -1849. City of Tukwila L. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila. Washington 98188 (206) 433 -11149 f T ? ftli vt;t SYL irx'is�srz`h?`6 =44 e : aJt :t.7v12artr::n`.i'fuuxfr,.vccc i1*raa:a aK MA•AuiwA- .M.a4r arn+rr r_nreerAM A:tIVAW:1421 tAt. mrYSa 'zr.*AtraY'r.Sin!v;SB∎nr, MCB /sjn Dear. John: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Mr. John Richards Project Development Officer Rainier National Bank Property Management Group P.O. Box 3966 - NO6 -2 Seattle, WA 98124 -3966 Subject: ANNEXATION - FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 July 8, 1988 I have read your letter of June 30 and would like to confirm that Option 1 is correct - if both Riverton and Fire District No. 1 are successful, the whole of the Rainier Bank property would be in Tukwila. Options 2 and 3 are incorrect, however, because you cannot exclude or delete property after an annexation occurs. If one annexation is successful and the other is not, you may leave your building partially in or you may petition to have the other lots and other half of the building annexed through the direct petition of the property owner, a fairly uncomplicated procedure. This common circumstance of being partially "in" highlights the problem of structures constructed over lot lines with no consolidation at the time of property development. I am sorry for the confusion; if this still seems unclear of if you would like to discuss the "direct petition method" of annexation, I would be happy to meet with you., Yours truly, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner bxu91!a3?nffSS•.N` CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 7(' 7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE PROPOSED FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION AREA ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION WHEREAS, a petition calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila was filed with the office of the King County Prosecuting Attorney, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the prosecuting attorney certified the petition as being sufficient on January 28, 1987, and transmitted the same to the City Council of the City of Tukwila on that date, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA responsible official issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation, and WHEREAS, the City Council has in Resolution 1036 previously expressed its support for the proposed annexation and expressed its intention to further consider approving the annexation upon the completion of an environmental impact statement, and and WHEREAS, draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, WHEREAS, the City Council has caused the filing of a notice of intention to annex the property with the King County Boundary Review Board, and WHEREAS, the King County Boundary Review Board currently has the matter under consideration, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to have the matter placed on the ballot for the November 8, 1988, election, and to accomplish that this resolution must be passed before a final determination has been made by the King County Boundary Review Board, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Tukwila, Washington, resolves as follows: Section 1. Approval of Annexation. The City Council hereby approves the proposed election method annexation to the City of Tukwila of the property described as the King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Annexation Area and further described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby incorporated herein, and requests that the King County Council immediately proceed to adopt an ordinance to provide that an election be held on November 8, 1988, within the proposed annexation area, on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila, subject to the right to withdraw said resolution depending upon the final determination of the King County Boundary Review Board. Section 2. Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.330, the City Council has previously adopted ordinances Nos. 1466 and 1467, providing for Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan designations and zoning regulations for the subject area to become effective upon annexation, and the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall upon annexation become subject to said zoning and land use regulations. 3553C3 Page 1 ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: By 3553C3 Section 3. Assessment and Taxation in Annexation Area. Pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the City Council hereby requires that there also be submitted to the electorate of the territory to be annexed a proposition that all property within the area to be annexed shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the City, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. Section 4. Notification of Petitioners. The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice to all of the petitioners either by mail or by publication as required by RCW 35A.14.020. Section 5. Filing of Petition. The City Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with the King County Council. aga'-e46 eS. CITY m 1z L. t .ERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FI •'0 WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: RESOLUTION NO.: JQ 77 AMP RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AT ITS REGULAR MEETING ON THE S DAY OF , 1988. C UNCIL PRESIDENT, MABEL J. HARRIS Page 2 ' 1 Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County JUL 11 1988 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296-7096 July 5, 1988 TO: FROM: IN RE: GBM /pr Enclosure as Noted Ref. 4.15.87 CITY OF TUKWILA G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO. 1450 - CITY OF TUKWILA - Prop. Annex. (KCFPD #1) Enclosed please find a Notice of Hearing to be held by the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County as prescribed in RCW 36.93.160(1). Rule I -D of the Rules of Practice and Procedure for the Board state as follows: "The Chief Clerk shall ascertain which governmental units are required by law to be notified of each hearing, and shall request from each governmental unit so affected a written statement to be submitted within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing of such request as to its position relative to the Notice of Intention." If you wish additional information relative to this proposal, please let me know. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED • >& Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 600136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 JUL 1 1 1988 \ NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO. 1450 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County will hold a public hearing at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, August 9, 1988, at Foster High School Cafeteria, 4242 So. 144th, Seattle, Washington, for the purpose of considering modification y addition of that annexation to the City of Tukwila known as "K.C.F.P.D. #1 ", all in King County, Washington, and described generally as: The area contained within the boundaries of King County Fire Protection District No. 1, TOGETHER WITH all unincorporated areas within Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., AND Sections 32 and 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington. AT SAID TIME AND PLACE, any and all interested persons may appear and be heard with reference to said proposal. DATED at Seattle, Washington, July 4, 1988. WASHINGTON STATE BOUNDARY REVI W BOARD FOR KING COUNTY G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary MARCH 1987 APRIL 1987 JANUARY 1988 FEBRUARY 1988 MARCH 1988 APRIL 1988 MAY 1988 JUNE 16, 1988 JULY 6, 1988 JULY 13, 1988 JULY 21, 1988 AUGUST 2, 1988 '� City of Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Fire District No. 1 Proposed Annexation NEGOTIATION SCHEDULE Tukwila submits Notice of Intention to BRB. Original legal description for Fire District No. 1 reviewed by King County Public Works. Tukwila receives comments; proceeds to revise where authorized as noted by King County. Tukwila submits revised perimeter legal description. Tukwila receives comment letter on revised legal from King County Public Works. Tukwila receives County DEIS comment letter raising issue of 16th Avenue bridge island north of Director Street. Tukwila schedules meeting with King County Road Engineer to discuss issue of 16th Avenue bridge island. Tukwila receives engineering report on 16th Avenue Bridge from King County Public Works. Tukwila City Council is briefed on issue. BRB Public Hearing - King County Public Works expresses support of annexation if 16th Avenue island is included. If proposal is not modified by addition, the County supports denial of annexation. JUNE 20, 1988 Tukwila Council discusses Tukwila resolution (Attachment A) calling for regional cooperation on the 16th Avenue Bridge and commitment of Tukwila to its fair share of cost. JUNE 29, 1988 Meeting between King County and Tukwila staffs and Tukwila Council President Harris to discuss interlocal agreement process and content. JULY 5, 1988 Tukwila Council adopts above resolution. King County and Tukwila staffs meet to discuss interlocal agreement. Discuss need for County Council's immediate involvement and commitment to an interlocal. Tukwila staff meet with Councilman Nichols to discuss issue and to request a motion and resolution similar to Tukwila's. Tukwila Mayor and staff meet with Councilman Simms to also request a resolution from the King County Council. King County Executive, Councilman Nichols, County staff, Tukwila Mayor, Tukwila Council President Harris, Tukwila staff, Seattle City Engineer and Seattle City Councilwoman Williams' representative meet to discuss Seattle's involve- ment in a regional solution to the 16th Avenue South bridge. Tukwila and King County Executive agree on a regional approach to 16th Avenue South bridge; however, no County Council response has yet been received. Seattle has not formally responded, however preliminary indi- cations are for no Seattle responsibility for the facility. (26 /FD1.NEGOTI) (08/09/88) CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A COOPERATIVE SOLUTION TO THE COST IMPACTS OF THE 16TH AVENUE BRIDGE, LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. WHEREAS, Tukwila has an annexation pending before the King County Boundary Review Board referred to as Fire District Number 1, and WHEREAS, Tukwila recognizes the east line of 16th Avenue South, lying east of the Duwamish River and up to the south Seattle City Limits, as the logi- cal north boundary of Fire District No. 1 as shown on Exhibit A (attached), and WHEREAS, the Fire District Number 1 annexation is adjacent to the 16th Avenue bridge, and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila believes that the majority of the bridge's use benefits the City of Seattle and /or King County and that the bridge should thus be in either of their jurisdictions, and WHEREAS, if the Fire District Number 1 annexation is approved, a small portion of the traffic using the bridge may be from the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the 16th Avenue Bridge is identified as a costly capital facility with regional users and impacts, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council wishes to participate with King County and other government agencies in addressing regional issues, and WHEREAS, negotiations with King County, Seattle and state and federal agencies are necessary to resolve funding of the 16th Avenue Bridge operation, maintenance, repair and construction, and WHEREAS, it is recognized that these negotiations cannot be completed prior to the proposed November 1988 vote on the Fire District Number 1 annexa- tion, NOW THEREFORE, the Tukwila City Council resolves as follows: Authorization to Negotiate. The Mayor is hereby authorized to negoti- ate with King County and other agencies for a fair share cost of the 16th Avenue Bridge. The total cost must be apportioned fairly among all affected agencies, including but not limited to the State of Washington, King County, the City of Seattle, and the City of Tukwila. Furthermore, because of King County's present status and size as the regional governmental agency and as their current role as investigator and liaison for the upgrade and /or replacement of the bridge, they should serve as the coordinating body and provide lead agency responsibilities. APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this c5 day of / ; 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Maxi Anderson, City Clerk FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: 9 " 5 " 81 r PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:7 RESOLUTION NO: /7 CIT'L OF TUKWILA Mabel Harris, Council President APP VED AS TO ORM: ice o t e City A orney ATTACHMENT A 44 N a) WHISTLE - I 1hi ' . , . 1 i • i / ... . !... 1 IL 'Milli:: . t.: .1 • ..— --- —_ _ _ 1 I ff I . 1- 6 ritl 1111 Iliti . 4 I il I N N G \\(.....,...,• I . .....„ oN , -5- \ 17 0 \ I- -1-, \• '< /// • • ‘.... • '-•.. „ ......, , N N ,:. - . .• • c s. N ...,.., ez- • s > 41146 •- •-• „ 1 46 1 • ■ L.1 n t e • June 30, 1988 Rainier National Bank P.O. Box 3966, Seattle, Washington 98124 — 3966 Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Moira Carr Bradshaw Re: Annexation - Fire District No. 1 Dear Moira: RumERBAmi ® .� . ^v ,;,.:�;4�np ^w_�. , {:.,'.�;`ii `c'�.r',`.t:IT�:SM..L• r .- '� p " ^r .�: aeCS 17'.� g :'r. .u; V ti .n ... « %� �[�. }'$. ..>- �.,.d: -. •. .�. a. .., �. .. _'t;,:... �.t �..,_.,. aG,.u;c C� .,...,,,:, }..w... ,...5 .i. s...fS. This letter is to confirm Rainier Bank's understanding of the City of Tukwila recommendation to the Boundary Review Board on June 16, 1988. On that date, during the public hearing, the city recommended that the annexation boundary line, remain as proposed. The proposed line bisects the property owned by Rainier Bank at 12400 East Marginal Way. Rainier Bank understands that the city recommends proceeding ahead with the annexation boundary as proposed because the remainder of the Rainier Bank property is within the current Riverton Heights annexation proposal. Because of this second annexation proposal, several options are available to Rainier Bank: 1. If annexation of Fire District No. 1 area is approved and if annexation of the Riverton Heights area is approved, then the whole of Rainier Bank property will be annexed into Tukwila, too. 2. If the annexation of Fire District No. 1 area is approved, but the annexation of the Riverton Heights area is not approved, then Rainier Bank has the option to petition to have the whole of its property either included or excluded from the Fire District No. 1 annexation area. 3. If the annexation of Fire District No. 1 area is not approved but the annexation of the Riverton Heights area is approved, then Rainier Bank has the option to petition to have the whole of the property either included or excluded from the Riverton Heights annexation area. '.: eztiII MA'Q+1'm r"ni:Sra At 1 Wtal*mib — Rainier National Bank J Planning Department City of Tukwila June 30, 1988 Page 2 wa�axs� ;:�rsttsRve�;�x��suxn.�te„ Rainier Bank appreciates the City of Tukwila's concern for the best treatment of the Rainier Bank property. Rainier Bank (based upon the above listed options) concurs with the City of Tukwila recommendation. Thank you for your time and effort to listen, understand and recommend equitable solutions to the concerns of each property owner affected by the proposed annexation. John Richards Project Development Officer and Staff Architect Property Management Group: N06 -2 (206) 621 -5559 cc: Raj Manhas, N06 -2 Dean Myers, N06 -2 Dick Decker, N06 -2 Bob Smith, N06 -2 .../41 i;" MA i{ o.w' til 7. '.'Sk'41` aitrog ;Ma June 20, 1988 Ms. Dorothy Owens King County Clerk 402 King County Courthouse 3rd and James Seattle, WA 98104 Dear Ms. Owens: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 In reviewing the enclosed resolution that the Tukwila Council has already adopted, it seems inadequate for what we are currently requesting of the County Council. I will therefore be drafting a new resolution this week which should be adopted Tuesday, July 5th. We will then forward that to you and perhaps talk with a County Councilmember about sponsorship. I would appreciate any further suggestions to facilitate the process. I can be reached at 433 -1848. Thank you very much for your assistance you have been most helpful. Yours truly .i' • / `/ �i Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner 0042.010.004 JEH /ko 03/12/87 ATTACHMENT A WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. /C36 1 CERTIFICATION 1 ;44� %iiii-a;, City Clerk of the :v oft :wita. do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original on file with the City. DATED thisi d1 day of . t 9 ,Z. City Clerk CITY OF TUKWILA A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, EXPRESSING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION OF THE AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. WHEREAS, King County Fire Protection District No. 1 is contiguous to and generally north of the current Tukwila City limits, and WHEREAS, a petition signed by 96 registered voters of the unincorporated territory within the boundaries of the Fire District and expressing support for and seeking annexation to the City of Tukwila via the election method has been received by the City, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office has certified the petition for annexation to the City and the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila has certified the validity of the signatures on the petition, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation and preparation of an environmental impact statement is soon to be undertaken, and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously expressed its encouragement to the residents of King County Fire Protection District No. 1 to submit an annexation petition to the City and the City Council intends to strongly consider approving the annexation once an environmental impact statement has been prepared for the proposal, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a Notice of Intention to Annex the property should be filed with the K:ng County Boundary Review Board in order to begin the review process of that body as soon as possible, now, therefore, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Expression of Intent. The City Council of the City of Tukwila hereby expresses its intent to consider the annexation of the property commonly known as King County Fire Protection District No. 1, a petition for the annexation of which has been filed with the City of Tukwila and is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The Council will proceed to consider approving the annexation as soon as an environmental impact statement for the proposal has been completed. Section 2. Authorization for Mayor. The Mayor of the City of Tukwila is hereby authorized to file a Notice of Intent to Annex Fire District No. 1 with the King County Boundary Review Board and to take all necessary steps to process the same to conclusion. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this /4 cA day of .. 2% 1 ; 7 e&A.Ar_.4 ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: `?V,%a TE ERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY AT ORNEY BY FILED WITH THE ITY PASSED BY THE CITY C RESOLUTION NO. /6,3 4 i 3. 5'7 IL: 3 i6• S'7 , 1987. • .Y June 16, 1988 Dear Board Members: King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th SE, Suite 122 Bellevue, Washington 98006 Subject: King County Fire District #1 Annexation CITY OF RENTON 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2580 MAYOR Earl Clymer The City of Renton has reviewed the City of Tukwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1. We endorse Tukwila's proposed annexation as modified in Alternative II, presented on page 8 and in figure 5 in Tukwila's draft environmental impact statement. Due to concerns regarding the issues of sewer and water utility provision to the Empire Way South area, as well as the completion of Renton's planned extension of Oakesdale Avenue through the southernmost portion of the proposed annexation area, we request that the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way (hereinafter referred to as "subarea 3 ") be deleted from the annexation proposal (please refer to Exhibits 1 and 2). The City of Renton is supportive of this modified proposal due to its consistency with both the 1987 Renton - Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment and the Washington State Boundary Review Board objectives as set forth in RCW 36.93.180. The following discussion constitutes the City of Renton's position on the City of Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1. Background Information In 1974, the City of Tukwila sought King County Boundary Review Board approval of a proposal to annex King County Fire District #1 (also known as the "Duwamish - Allentown Annexation "). In response to this annexation proposal, the City of Renton adopted Resolution 1943 which stated Renton's opposition to the annexation and requested that the Boundary Review Board delete "any and all territories that are presently included within the boundaries of the Renton School District, and such additional areas that could be more adequately served by the City of Renton, including utility services, fire and police protection" (please refer to Exhibit 3). The Boundary Review Board deleted several areas from the annexation proposal, including the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way (please refer to Exhibit 4). ATV. Ai King County Fire Distr t #1 Annexation June 16, 1988 Page 2 In early 1987, the cities of Renton and Tukwila formalized an interlocal agreement (please refer to Exhibit 5) which established the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way as the logical common boundary between the two cities south of South 143rd Street (please refer to Exhibit 6). The agreement also requires joint review of any annexation east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way, north and west of the existing Renton corporate limits, and south of South 132nd Street (please refer to Exhibit 7). In 1987, the City of Tukwila received a petition from King County Fire District #1 calling for an election to vote upon the annexation of the district. Since Tukwila was already providing fire protection service to the area on a contractual basis, they accepted the petition and began the process of determining the impacts and alternatives associated with the proposed annexation. In March 1987, the City of Renton requested that Tukwila delete the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way from the annexation proposal (please refer to Exhibits 1 and 2). Tukwila issued a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) on the annexation proposal in February 1988 which presented several alternative annexation boundaries, including the revised boundary and the deletion of subarea 3 as proposed by Renton. As stated on page 8 of the DEIS, "The industrial /multi - family area west of Empire Way South (subarea 3) has been excluded because it represents a logical extension of the City of Renton as recognized by the Renton - Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment agreement." In March 1988, Tukwila issued the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) and the planning staffs from both cities began negotiating an interlocal agreement addressing the deletion of subarea 3 from Tukwila's annexation. On April 28, 1988, the Renton and Tukwila City Councils met to discuss the Fire District #1 annexation and the draft interlocal agreement. The Tukwila council was reluctant to alter the annexation boundaries from the original proposal due to their concern that any modification may jeopardize the entire annexation proposal. However, they did acknowledge potential difficulties in extending utility services to subarea 3 and, as a result, they have looked to Renton to provide these services. On May 23, 1988, the Renton council reaffirmed its position on the deletion of subarea 3 (please refer to Exhibit 8). The council also stated Renton's intent to actively support Renton's annexation of the property in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry upon the Boundary Review Board's deletion of subarea 3, or upon the failure of Tukwila's proposed annexation election. Utility Service As stated above, Tukwila has acknowledged potential difficulties in extending utility services to subarea 3. Tukwila states on page 82 of the DEIS, "...the extension of sewers to the (subject) area...would logically occur through an extension of the City of Renton system." Page 26 of the FEIS reads, "The DEIS assumes that if sewer service was extended into the (subject) area currently on septic systems, such service would best by provided by the City of Renton." In addition, pages 54 -55 of the FEIS reads, "The Empire Way South area is most logically served by Renton. The Skyway Critical Water Supply Study has supported this by recommending that the (subject) area be served by Renton." The City of Renton has acknowledged that Renton may be the logical and cost - effective utility service provider in the eastern half of subarea 3 and Renton's Comprehensive Sewerage Plan and Comprehensive Water System Plan includes this portion of the subarea within the city's municipal service area (please refer to Exhibits 9 and 10). However, existing Boundary • King County Fire Distr .• #1 Annexation June 16, 1988 Page 3 Review Board policy discourages the extension of utility services beyond corporate boundaries, and existing Renton policy discourages the provision of sewer service beyond the corporate boundaries unless the Seattle -King County Health Department has declared an emergency health hazard requiring immediate sewer connection. Even if a health emergency is declared, the property owner is usually required to sign a "Covenant to Annex" agreeing to support the eventual annexation of the property to the City of Renton. Renton is statutorally prohibited by RCW 35A.14.230 from acting upon any annexation efforts in the subject area until Tukwila's proposed annexation has been reviewed by the King County Boundary Review Board and subarea 3 has been deleted from the proposal, or until the proposed annexation election fails. Oakesdale Avenue Extension The City of Renton has recognized the need for a major arterial to link the southern portion of the Seattle industrial area with the industrial and corporate employment centers in Renton and Kent. The link was first discussed in 1982 and was refined in the City of Renton's Valley Transportation Improvements Program in 1986. The Oakesdale Avenue extension (please refer to Exhibit 11) is a six -phase transportation improvement project which will, upon completion, link State Route 900 /Empire Way with State Route 167 in Kent. Two phases have been completed: 1) from SW 30th Street to SW 43rd Street and 2) from Monster Road to SW Grady Way in the vicinity of the Black River Corporate Park. A third phase is presently under construction from SW Grady Way under Interstate 405 to SW 16th Street. Oakesdale Avenue is planned as a five -lane major arterial. Project funding for the completed phases was obtained primarily through local improvement district (LID) assessments and transportation impact mitigation fees. Funding options are under study for the remaining construction phases. Boundary Review Board Annexation Objectives As we read the statutes, the inclusion of subarea 3 in the City of Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1 does not conform to the Washington State Boundary Review Board objectives as listed in RCW 36.93.180: 1. Creation and preservation of logical service areas Through the inclusion of the majority of subarea 3 in the City of Renton's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Comprehensive Sewerage Plan, Renton has identified the area as being within Renton's planning, impact and municipal service areas. In addition, page 15 of the DEIS states that Tukwila's sphere of influence "includes most of Allentown and Riverton Gardens, both in subarea 4. In the case of Renton, this includes the southernmost portion of the study area south of South 133rd Street in subarea 3." 2. Use of physical boundaries; preservation of natural neighborhoods The majority of subarea 3 is physically removed from Tukwila and oriented toward Renton due to the physical boundary created by the Burlington Northern railroad tracks which run along the eastern edge of the subarea. In addition, steep slopes both physically and visually separate the majority of subarea 3 from Tukwila and orient the area toward Renton. Z j iirwdnlC ,W∎ " :.T e:;n dtatELy:�vki.:kFW.uw, vans: ra. a - xv.a w�.�w.w <n....... ........_.........._.... ........_.___. ..._............�«...«.....+�.. Sincerely, King County Fire Distri 1-#1 Annexation June 16, 1988 Page 4 3. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries The revised boundary would be in keeping with the 1987 Renton - Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment which established the Burlington Northern right -of -way as a logical common boundary between the two cities. The boundary line adjustment also provided for, joint Renton - Tukwila review of all annexation proposals in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry and the eastern Earlington Hill area. Conclusion The City of Renton respectfully requests that the King County Boundary Review Board include this letter in the board's official record on the City of Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1. Furthermore, the City of Renton requests that the board modify the annexation boundaries to exclude the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way, referred to as subarea 3 in the draft and final environmental impacts statements on the proposed annexation, and that the board approve Tukwila's annexation of Alternative II. If you have any questions, or if you desire additional information, please contact Larry Springer or Carrie Trimnell in the City of Renton's Planning Division at 235 -2552. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed annexation. Earl Clymer Mayor Attachments cc: ct:dsk3b:fd 1 brb Honorable Gary VanDusen, Mayor, City of Tukwila Larry Springer, City of Renton Planning Manager Carrie Trimnell, City of Renton Assistant Planner L. Rick Beeler, City of Tukwila Planning Director ..e. Fina ,....nevr»ansm*amr.+ru..Fmoo. ,....x.vgnIA +'IMEKV S IIN ^JSI ...yp. - 4 .. L1au. ' 1'1 L = . .I 1004 l t1 a 1 Al 1 4 94.1 04, r . • L 1 : 1 Z • i._. 4 ' .. 1 7 11 ''' - • T .I. a ...Jo r L : C r • �} I• e sr w ° ti :o 1 1 11 , --.5.5851.—..5.—_11 < Z \\ 5 cl r l il. L . 'mitt � J ❑unlit c.� T f II; d r r t ,5 r. o = �'ISIl 11 • ST � 159 U11!".!!... q�1rlLf5 - ;1 CPEStOS1 sr ntEll_ Ol1tII014 51 r f !riga 004r oble •4c.o Course ':. .t1r, 17. 1' ( 1:•n1 -' 1 a\ _Ir \� E nll.�ii' :prow 1. �• 1! : ! fir :y :111\1 CI i 1` moot! SIlt1S a. t oar -r•T' d!? -9 t _i. 1 . i . 1 . 1 ts V j — • ;Li: 1 � n • =� II -` rEag >n Lel ; " 3 i r"c 1 : • I 1 =1� • j l r • . , • ? . 4 •. c. �rT� • �.f •. RESOLUTION NO.1943 WHEREAS there is now pending before the King County Boundary Review Board a proposed annexation to the City of Tukwila of a certain area generally known as the Duwamish - Allentown annexation, and WHEREAS various governmental entities and others have heretofore and are now studying the effect and consequences of any such proposed annexation by the City of Tukwila, especially as it may relate to •:� public services, including school districts, water and sewer utilities, and J� • WHEREAS the City of Renton has likewise reviewed any such proposal as it affects the City of Renton's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and WHEREAS it has been duly determined that any such annexation by'the City of Tukwila, as proposed, would not be in the best interest of the general public, and of the City of Renton in particular, NOW THEREFORE • THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RENTON, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE • AS FOLLOWS; , i t • SECTION I: The City of Renton hereby re- affirms its previous i position to said proposed annexation: by the City of Tukwila as set forth in the City's letters dated October 17 and November 15, 1974. The City of Renton further determines that such proposed annexation would not be in the best interest of the citizens and residents • within said proposed area; that in addition thereto such proposal would include a portion of the'Renton School District, together with other lands that are basically oriented toward the City of Renton, and which in turn are already receiving some services from the City. : SECTION II: The City of Renton therefore requests the King County Boundary Review Board to review and re -study the proposal for annexation by the City of Tukwila and to delete therefrom any and all territories that are presently included within the boundaries II I '4ij1ioH -1- . o38; o" ttiiythr '.L'ii3�<aiQ�l.'f } taela: wmx.•.... n.. mma.+. A vv...w�yw..- .�.... ......_. -- .,..,T...a..,r.. • :t of the Renton School District, and such additional areas that could be'more adequately served by the City of Renton, including utility services, fire and police protection. • PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL this 25thday of November, 1974. Approved as to form: atA GeFard . Shellan, City Attorney elores APPROVED BY THE MAYOR this 25th day of Nov- i ber, 1974. A. Mead, City Clerk c Jr A. e ry Gar iet , mayor %tl BOEING FIELD \uS ` $.c77111•. 'Lj INTERN • i , J q/RPORj ;r 1161 • St • 0 1 1 1 t ( .1111411 7' T 1 1011140 7! - ; ir 1011i...11 '' L (1 fC i . ,Se •' . ;. 11• ;1 l • t,V 1• v • i e � , ! o +9 Pit l 1 nn,ln� St 1 i. • Y - lT �.,,, i n • ^ � i 7 . I I • Fp 1 • 1 • 1: � a,,, „ 6� , : '1 ; (1)111 A 1 r'- 7. 3 ^ 9 1411 "' 4 :. 1• �..� 14 11.71 - �` - S (., �• 1 741,1, 11 .14..-. 1 n 1a $Iµ.1411(( •1 1 : \� r .01'11 •° •, 1 11. 1013 1 11 x t •�\ • t .In�, ll. 11,1 ,./f f I I �, S f 11 0 L •P - I .. ^ •� •;1:,1114 „'., :' V .- I -. • , 3 '1 r0 moan, 11 1 1 • `L t C• 141 SI: 1471'•.., 1\ 1,,, y;liir14 Sty_ l 1 4 0 elf 14b1ff i :'I o - { 4')fl ' sT '' f' "''4 v, 1 } 11114 1,.! a''' •1 fn • u. ..I 1r. 1„sms(• L .,'.• 1 dl l .v • _ is 411.11. 10 7 1 1` .1 1.1 1 _ ST 1111111 71 /171117 t 1w1• t, - 13 s t oi7'1i \ \. ° L I gf t t. 1 \ I I '• \tt 111 1.1 .1 . 1Yjr . ^_. NI .. �l �� SI'I t_1 /ST •. •.r,• h i. r _ - .••h 9 1111' ••: 11(1" .r, • ! •441 AVIA 01111 .1 it T�i I ;- ••,. `uIJ i' 1 . I u1l lY i 5�1 r! '-It CiI -' Acvs.c A471 \ ± t��;�----- njri��1 l' ' iJ rr• IjL..nL, •� :,� .1.1} �s�lr_ : r N III 4 r ' l t I S2 1 I I 'N , , /1 uJ `1141, i ll!� CI Af.f ; T ✓ rYCH,lS•`7 1.11 .7i: 1, tT 11;1....„ rr 7- S' j i: I 11 : . l , . 1 ' ' . \ • ' :� A t • - I ii...,- 1 ; . . . ' i• ' ."I. (1..1.0 7 .� , ..� •' _L i i 't '• 11 1011/1 L ✓.I.i ,L 7 w ::: I • : Ir;l �;: r :I n i tt , � � U 1iilOH • a ✓ ..% ,r1,1 I t . a 11. T. .11 4 c :I ,11. : 4 A I1.. © ��" 1 1 , , N Lij. 1 1 f 3 ammo= 4 .. • 1 3, • 1513 ♦ T t .. + .vj IJ.IN a si • • 3.. "."_, is : � j�( 10 • 1\.114 1, • .�. 7 7 19311.11.... i S I�Y!l. 17 � 1 4 1 15}1 .. i 4• n h C� r $0010.6•11 S • 110111 ' ! I • 1 01 IA n , 0" ....; . 15 S 'Ltf1 1.1 is • u � II "� % s It + t Hr'•1 I• 11 11 :1 i0 • • .. CI u' 1 ' . + ' I 1 1Mt ;, , 1. 5 .!:! 1, '^ 1 y � S 0 I S N u I.' 1 �.. 1 wilt! .. r ? 7 : � ., t 14 -t i • /. R .. , _}' 1 1 1 . 15• 111 •t S wl►r y1 T . i.::• LLIK v - - t • .� V tt • 1.41 ' !1 2 14 + Air's .... t • 1.• 111 :, "'.I 1 • 1 1•7111 • • 90 .. •71 "I. • II :1, i._'......L'•1t .•...'tt:1 7 • i 1 11 nl 11'1.1:.. 22 ...... 51 Li 0,01 0 /1/1 1.. l . S 1'(1..10 (.1 •11 1 SI ,r r nlo'•1 ) \1 ;All.lkR HEACI i eii 1 ER BEACH I \11 r1, /./ Its I U All t` /7 4.41/99 ' 1151 1 !`' +•L�• � oalsr \• • a ICY s /1 jet i EM •` +.,: C..> .., P n• I PG�REEM6N'� CAG 046-86 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL ANNEXATIONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila ", and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton ". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 , which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. / hi R ' which calls for certain property currently located t n en ton ton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit 8 to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement.shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension is uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left• to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50 %. 3. S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50 %. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P -1 Channel. The P -1 Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P -1 Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P -1 Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR -181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR -181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR -181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. viamAlla Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 CITY OF 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DATED this // 5 day of i c, 1986. IL • N , OR Z APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CIJY ATTORNEY CITY OF RENTON r' e p BARBARA Y. SHI POCH, MAYOR MAXINE E. MOTOCITY CLERK awretta r-. -- LAWRENCE J. WAR C Y A ORN LA Y SECTION- TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 3.62 T2779 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MDC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MDC (p) 2.9 1.14 . 9 MDC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) VI= 21 MDC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 - SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) 10.43 24 (portion) 5.44 11:113 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 .0.17 38 0.14 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 • 13 29 0.12 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 ' 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 5.54 36 3.09 TOTAL 45 parcels 101.65 r EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. .......... .v..n.w.. r. <.ro•,..au,newu -tea t ,..rm w•wi•:•r,S'Y„t'�E ■ Lands to Renton Finure 1 Renton -Tukwi Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas :y: Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton I N w * ` 0 2004• SECTION - TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot 12 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila • The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. Fioure 1 Renton -Tukwi 3oundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton . re, sn. av'. �^.: r-..:• m::.. y. 9.: uw! YVV�hnrSC� 'StK:3�^.nF::'i,'�.:: �" 3000• ..•.'1: "Y. .v ...... a... ..... .r +.. c., . ..'W.a..uz ra - .a�.v.,.•�e....�. .,.*r�n, camvrnn t x,)•nu.mf+r• n ■1. 1 . �n ...nze'F..S,:'<t'•',miC; .�Ff: �s- ...'�i -�v.. r :::;14(1AA:Afr 6Zrbtil-A EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila- Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions -111 111 "ffi qi 4. Aural s w, 001SRA1t�gS01Ep��yg� ' vow..v.ge, 4 �., (!ll lrll• rin yl ..i n veripi • • W) 4PAIzY ILAJOipsrlsolg-HT 6 61 getettrY1 ri/nr 12t4"1 eustceAryttAkt-' 11 41 T I I Ili! ...." DAM, I••111 , i i l 1 ...7 1 0.-- i• -1 t..? r I . • r _ J " ' z 14' 6.11.1 .4101161 Ur.. oft Mr* 1110111110 May 23. 1988 LID: 330, Grady Way Project Streets: SW 27th Street /Strander Boulevard Joint Project with Tukwila Community Services Committee Annexati King, County l Fire 01 to ,, Tukwila,.,:A..r:a:`;s ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Ways and Means Committee Legal: Topless Dancing Legislation Resolution #2723 Public Works: Assessments for Parcel #4 of LID #330 Resolution #272Z Finance: Banking Services Resolution *2721 Public Works: Rainier Avenue South /Airport Way South Improvements and Airport Paving Resolution: #2720 Legal: Topless Dancing Legislation Vouchers ADJOURNMENT 05/23/88 Renton City Council Minutes Page 166 Public Works Department requested segregation of assessment for Parcel 4 owned by Puget Western in LID 330, Grady Way Improvement Project, due to right -of -way acquisition by City for Oakesdale Avenue SW and P -I Channel. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for resolution. Public Works Department requested review of interlocal agreement with City of Tukwila for funding and construction of the SW 27th Street /Strander Boulevard roadway, as agreed' to at joint meeting between Tukwila and Renton City Councils. Refer to Ways and Means Committee for review and resolution. Community Services Committee recommended that the Policy Development Department continue negotiations with Tukwila to delete the area east of Burlington Northern railroad tracks from Tukwila's proposed annexation of Fire District Ml, and that the City of Renton initiate annexation proceedings for the area in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry. Council concur. MOVED BY KEOLKER- WHEELER, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending the following ordinance for first reading: A ordinance was read amending Chapter 1, 'Business Licenses' of Title V Re Establishment of Regulatory Standards and Licenses for Businesses et al that provide Adult Entertainment in the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL REFER ORDINANCE BACK TO WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE FOR TWO WEEKS. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of the following resolutions: A resolution was read segregating assessments for Parcel a4 of LID *330. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. A resolution was read designating the demand deposit account depository and authorizing execution of an agreement thereof. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. A resolution was read authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute documents requesting allocation for Federal funds for Rainier Avenue South /Airport Way South safety improvements, and airport pavement rehabilitation. MOVED BY HUGHES, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS PRESENTED. CARRIED. In response to Councilman Stredicke's request for written response indicating whether or not this item is on the priority list for the six year street program, Mayor Clymer noted matter will be referred to staff for response. A resolution was read adopting findings of fact in support of an ordinance regulating and licensing the businesses, managers, and employees that provide adult entertainment in the City of Renton. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL ADOPT RESOLUTION AS • PRESENTED. CARRIED. Ways and Means Committee Chairman Stredicke presented a report recommending approval of Vouchers 40775 through 41131 in the amount of $1,343,878.82, having departmental certification that merchandise /services have been received or rendered; Vouchers 40779, 40784 -40786 machine voided. MOVED BY STREDICKE, SECONDED BY HUGHES, COUNCIL APPROVE THE VOUCHERS AS PRESENTED. CARRIED MOVED BY KEOLKER - WHEELER, SECONDED BY MATHEWS, COUNCIL ADJOURN. CARRIED. Time: 7:46 p.m. DA CLE TS, Finance Director .t i -.. «..0 Earl Clymer, Mayor May 23, 1988 Maxine E. Motor, CMC . City Clerk ADDENDUM RENTON CITY COUNCIL Abbreviated Meeting M 1 N 13 T E S CITY OF RENTON FINANCE DEPARTMENT Maxine E. Motor, City Clerk Municipal Building Monday, 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers Correction on page 166, paragraph three, Community Services Committee report: Replace existing text with the following: The Community Services Committee discussed the City of Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #I and the recommended interlocal agreement between the two cities, and recommended that Renton staff be directed to work on the proposed interlocal with Tukwila staff rather than negotiate Council to Council. The Community Services Committee recommended that the proposed interlocal agreement address the deletion of the area east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way from Tukwila's proposal to annex King County Fire District #1. Upon deletion of the subject area, the Committee recommended that the City of Renton initiate annexation proceedings on the property in the vicinity of the Black River Quarry. The Committee recommended that Renton reaffirm its opposition to the siting of an incinerator at the Black River Quarry given the obvious on- and off -site impacts. The Committee recommended that Renton reaffirm the ranking of the Oakesdale Avenue extension from State Route 900 to Monster Road as a high priority in the Valley Transportation Improvement Program; and reaffirm its position requiring annexation as a condition of sanitary sewer service connection. Council concur. 200 Mill Avenue South - Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2501 is ): I •.� 1 I i ' .1. 1.2.-15,1;t1 ra. - s1 %S l Mod _21_5 ' 150t•• _ I sr I till "1''t? 22 ... .. t t!... LI T • .118 I• I S }TI1 .. T 4'/ Sr . 51 CPLST011 ,t 141151111 4LC 01111 51 1 lair 1 �1 1115!" r;. f !`1 ,t111 �Y S r I 5 . • 4L .Lo _ . L.ylyu u s vi.aslrn :.Sr n : P1 a.t1 ? I \ t. 'P SI . ,,441x rlinst AR S_ sI!. is, 5„5( . _� r.tor, M S 411 •fr . 1 1 rdpIlfo(sl 1. .. Fr y yr .� SPOIL nl - ' •. N 1.0151 5 1111.11.1: C 11 7._ ! .. ._ • 1 I rl I : ¢ W > t L • '11 /11: '`, 1 L .."S" \ A/. U i ; I i ,a) e I I I I Was lz i n b t• I I Y \ ' 1 v; N•1 TIUV4L o / T \ .arllP .. \ :.. 1. �J 7.141111 51 _14111 1!)/ I5Q f °I Sf 22 r ; ,•.. nrrt.r,i - 51 'LP[5(O1r 51 51 02.! ._ Oulltair, 51 r r 1 • • M1I I.1: S 111 1 .: .n� ' p_III 1 \ 7F.851Cr1 Sr F \ 5 111%101 ' 'N ,1 1'. .1, ' ;il.."2'1 tr ', • •Ir 1: 1 +' ,.. It 1 „x > l I 1 — . 0 . 1)1111 nrr ti F '. ” 0 %r:: { , Irnb15r P •L'I SI —n . •1: I ' ,� � —. t (1111.1.1, - .r i .1 1 -- r% :::7.-, 1 1- : :. I : . 7 tr .t�o.ly ' \ .. . Re-H17 wr- iik 10 T. Lak e { IIVa s h i n t { { c am: LW E'v. -......... ..... ...... , ts ftttlr4C;•■,14.0. ...It ••• ....- .1:..- 1101110 111111111011111 11110100 ini 1 INillil il° • 4 • • - - t-to -et ...-,,,,,v.....1 I , '''....4.(:::i4)=•.1:14c7 , ..........,...:...1:.. .. I aw... 0 1:300....e.. Av.. ilow .7 : ' .... . tt . • u , T ir .1: :[ '!"' MN I t: ..i.: • ... X 4 7 tots __:.. r 1- i ge 1 ;;'•i•yiri: FdY:? °.Yc,t:a ,.nre�.:::v�:',. ts•..•.....- ., ...... .,�.� • ., GLENN J. AMSTER JOEL N. BODANSKY LAURIE LOOTENS CHYZ MARK S. CLARK SALLY H. CLARKE T. RYAN DURKAN GARY M. FALLON ROBERT B. FIKSO RICHARD E. GIFFORD JEROME L. HILLIS GREGORY E. KELLER GEORGE A. KRESOVICH SARAH E. MACK Mr. Brice Martin Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Washington 98006 Dear Martin: $ y Ar � HILLIS, CLARK, MARTIN & PETERScN 1 '' • ' 1 L'" it t \'1 � t' , 1 '' ! A PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CORPORATION DEB RAH S. 500 GALLAND BUILDING JUN 2 219 O GE W. MARTIN. JR. X10` R ' C. MCPHERSON I _ 1221 SECOND AVENUE 1 A N F. NIL LOU S D. PETERSON SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101 -2925 i I • .• , , - , RICHARD MJPETERSON 'THOMAS F. PETERSON I ' :: r', , 'tSTEVEN R. 00VIG (206) 623 -1745 " -'-"-'— - "1lCH.oL•L.F. SCHUMACHER TELECOPIER (206) 623-7789 MICHAEL R. SCOTT TELEX 4947650 MATTHEW R SMITH THERESA R. WAGNER RICHARD R. WILSON LAW OFFICES OF June 16, 1988 Re: Proposed Fire District No. 1 Annexation to Tukwila; BRB File No. 1540p We are writing to you on behalf of our client, Stoneway Concrete, a division of Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. Stoneway has an interest in approximately 70 acres of land that includes a large portion of the existing Black River Quarry. This property is located within that portion of the above - referenced annexation area referred to as Sub -area 3. Stoneway has acquired its interest in this property in order to construct a concrete batch plant, shop facilities, and offices. Stoneway is opposed to the inclusion of Sub -area 3 within the area to be annexed to Tukwila and we would request that, pursuant to the authority granted by RCW 36.93.150(2), the Boundary Review Board modify the annexation proposal to delete Sub -area 3 from the area proposed for annexation. We have set forth the reasons for this request below. The factors that the Board must consider in reaching its decision on this proposed annexation are set forth in RCW 36.93.170. This section of the statute establishes three general categories of factors to be considered. The proposed annexation of Sub -area 3 by the City of Tukwila is in direct conflict with these factors. The first subsection deals with existing circumstances such as population, land uses, existing comprehensive plans and zoning, topography, natural boundaries, and other such factors. Sub- area 3 is physically and functionally isolated from the City of K.C.B.R.B. FILE # „yv Exhibit# � Mr. Brice Martin June 16, 1988 Page 2 • Tukwila. It lies to the east of the existing center of Tukwila and is separated from Tukwila by the Duwamish River. As the City's own Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( "DEIS ") notes at page 25, east /west travel within the annexation area is obstructed by the need for bridges crossing the Duwamish River. Annexation of this area would also conflict with the adopted land use plans for this area. Renton and Tukwila have entered into an Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations dated August 11, 1986. That agreement provides that "Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary lines shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as of set forth in full." Sub -area 3 is within the area governed by this agreement. The City of Renton has identified Sub -area 3 as an area that is within its sphere of influence and that is subject to eventual annexation by the City of Renton. Further, it has not agreed to annexation of this area by Tukwila as contemplated by this Interlocal Agreement. Thus, annexation of - Sub -area 3 by Tukwila would conflict with this agreement between Tukwila and Renton. It would also appear to conflict with the intent of the King County Comprehensive Plan which encourages the use of such interlocal agreements. DEIS, p. 7. Finally, because this Sub -area has not been identified within the City of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan as part of the "Tukwila Planning Area ", annexation of this Sub -area would also appear to violate the intent of the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. The second category of factors that the statute requires the Board to consider deals with the relationship of governmental services and regulations to the annexation area. This category of factors includes municipal services, governmental codes, regulations on existing uses, and prospects for governmental services. In the DEIS Tukwila notes that it will not be providing governmental services throughout the entire annexation area. In fact, our discussions with the City of Tukwila indicate that it would be practically impossible for the City of Tukwila to provide sewer and water services to most, if not all, of Sub -area 3. It appears that the most logical provider of such services to this Sub -area would be the City of Renton. In our discussions, both Renton and Tukwila have acknowledged this. The City of Renton has a restrictive policy on extending utility services outside of its City limits and does not do so prior to annexation of the Mr. Brice Martin June 16, 1988 Page 3 .,.....,..- ..•,....,.s +...:•..v..,c�...,. �....a«n., �..,._, e. v,« ..vn.w.sr..,w,_- � >r�y; The legal boundaries of Fire District No. 1 were established before I -5 was built and many of the properties developed. Consequently they do not necessarily form logical annexation boundaries. DEIS, p.8. A glance at the proposed boundaries of Sub -area .?!`;Z14 =': it rlfT.': N? 3'. 7•'I .i = u'= :`S�:'?I:: i':?r�?�.�slii:r`,> .. area to be served. Nevertheless, Tukwila has proceeded with the proposal for annexation of Sub -area 3 without first insuring that the City of Renton would be willing to provide such essential municipal services to Sub -area 3 at all. Thus, if annexation of this Sub -area were to go forward it may well be impossible to obtain municipal sewer and water service in Sub -area 3. The last category of factors that the Board is required to consider by statute includes consideration of the general impacts of the proposal on the local governments that would be affected by it. In this respect the Board should consider the apparent violation of the Interlocal Agreement between Renton and Tukwila that would result from annexation of Sub -area 3 by the City of Tukwila. I would note that in its draft environmental impact statement, the City of Tukwila has established, as Alternative II, an annexation area that would not include Sub -area 3. In discussing this alternative the draft environmental impact statement says: The Industrial /multi- family area west of Empire Way South (Sub -area 3) has been excluded because it represents a logical extension of the City of Renton as recognized by the Renton - Tukwila boundary line adjustment agreement. DEIS, p. 8. We would submit that this admission by the City of Tukwila in its own environmental document conclusively establishes that annexation of this area to Tukwila would not be in keeping with the factors that are to be considered by the Board and the objectives that the Board must attempt to achieve. We would also note that Tukwila has acknowledged that the boundaries of the annexation area it has proposed are not necessarily logical. In the draft environmental impact statement it states: �Ia.��+:;Lai.`J.f "�t• �i�nt, ':4��i.,. 5'.?i;3.,,� ��.... Mr. Brice Martin June 16, 1988 Page 4 sa. 3 in relationship to the existing physical barriers in the area -- the Duwamish River, the Burlington Northern railroad tracks, and I -5 and I -405 -- is all that is needed to confirm this statement. The statute sets forth a list of objectives that the Boundary Review Board must attempt to achieve in rendering its decisions on proposed annexations. RCW 36.93.180. We believe that the present annexation proposal by Tukwila, insofar as it relates to Sub -area 3, violates at least the first four objectives set forth in that section of the statute. It would not preserve natural neighborhoods and communities. RCW 36.93.180(1). It does not use physical boundaries including bodies of water, highways, and land contours. RCW 36.93.180(2). It does not either create or preserve logical service areas. RCW 36.93.180(3). It does not prevent abnormally irregular boundaries. RCW 36.93.180(4). For these reasons we would urge the Board to delete Sub -area 3 from the proposed annexation. We would also note that there is a serious problem concerning the environmental review that has been completed in connection with this proposed annexation. Throughout the environmental documents that the City has issued, the City has consistently stated that there would be no impacts in connection with land use regulations because the City intended to adopt zoning and other land use regulations that would be comparable to those that now exist. However, recently, the City of Tukwila has adopted pre- annexation zoning that would apply to Sub -Area 3 that would result in almost all of the existing uses now located within Sub -Area 3 becoming non - conforming land uses. There has been no environmental review of this recent change. It is clear that this change is in direct conflict with the statements made in the City's environmental documents and that those documents would need to be revised before action can be properly taken on this proposal. (It would also seem to be an additional factor that would militate against acceptance of the proposal as provided for by RCW 36.93.170(2).) This is another reason for the Board to delete Sub -Area 3 from the proposed annexation area. We are not expressing any opinion on whether the balance of the area proposed for annexation shall be approved. However, we do not believe that any supportable case can be made for inclusion GAK /ceq 070650.D108 Wa Mr. Brice Martin June 16, 1988 Page 5 cc: Gary Merlino Don Merlino Anita West Lawrence Hard Larry Springer winzarsde of Sub -area 3 in this annexation proposal. If the Board determines to approve any portion of the annexation proposed by Tukwila, it should approve Alternative II which deletes Sub -area 3. Thank you for your consideration of our position. Very ruly yours, G orge . Kresovich CARL A. JONSON MICHAEL A. JONSON RICHARD E. JONSON JEFFREY L. CAREY WILLIAM N. SNELL Or COUNSEL BERT L. METZGER. JR. King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Dear Board Members: 1/7977- 3 /wasrblet.615 LAW OFFICES OF June 16, 1988 JONSON & JONSON, P.S. 3000 BANK OF CALIFORNIA CENTER 900 FOURTH AVE SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98164 12061 624.2521 Re: Proposed Annexation by City of Tukwila of an Area Known as Fire District No. 1 File No. 1450 BELLEVUE OFFICE. (BY APPOINTMENT) ^.-- - » 22D 0. , 11ZT1{ PVE N.E. f •!IL:!I ��` II ,J IIp ; UITE BELL VUE. WA 98004 (20 455.5030 ( JU N 1988TiLECOrIER , , , (206) 626'0349 r. i n We represent Skyway Water and Sewer District (Skyway) of King County. The portion of the annexation area identified as Subarea 3 (see attached map) in the draft and final environmental impact statement includes territory within the boundaries of Skyway and a portion of its sewer service area. The Board of Commissioners support the annexation by Tukwila, provided that Tukwila agrees to allow Skyway to provide sewer service to portions of Subarea 3. The Board of Commissioners opposes the proposed deletion by the City of Renton of Subarea 3 from the annexation proposal. Skyway has a 6 inch force main located in the public right -of -way in Empire Way South that has the capacity to provide additional service to Subarea 3. This is the closest sewer line to Subarea 3 along the northern boundary (Empire Way). Allowing Skyway to serve this area would preserve a logical service area and meet one of the essential review criteria for boundary review in RCW 36.93.180. To illustrate the need to preserve logical service areas Skyway has received a request for sewer service from Spider Staging which is located directly south of Empire Way and outside the boundaries of the District. Spider Staging's property abuts Empire Way and Skyway's 6 inch force main that is located in the right -of -way. The District's engineers, Gardner Consultants, advised the Commissioners that there is adequate capacity in the line to handle the additional sewage from Spider Staging. K.C.B.R.B. FILE # /stab Exhibit # Zr §vi::!a -n,asw . WNS:skp 1/7977- 3/wasrblet.615 .111.WWWFV411..1.40011.4 04.1 Washington State Boundary Review Board, Page 2 cc: Board of Commissioners, Skyway Water and Sewer District *mmtwmItmmvp -;1051%74:', Of special note is the fact that Spider Staging has notified the Board of Commissioners that its septic system is failing and there is an urgent need to provide an alternate means of service by connection to a sewer line. It is in the interest of protecting the public health to allow Skyway to extend service to such properties. Based on these factors, the Board of Commissioners urge your approval of the proposed annexation by Tukwila, including specifically Subarea 3. Respectfully submitted, JONSON & JONSON, P.S. illiam N. 1 11 A " I • - 1 _I5 �.1 lull ja1 L '.I" •.. • SG•• S . snr •-, n, ,•• 1.F St 1 �, 1k: &,. . 1 . III '. 7 — 'N: ' . I� i ; , � 17n v t f.ii..il• ikn',:FAwn146t1L,aE' : ie'• �.` iC` tih�. c'. A�4`:,. C�z�tr:•.: rv: Mi++ Nm .�.�e.,.....n�v�.wn..-.t��:�a•. �r Business Office 772 -4620 June 13, 1988 Dear Mr. Martin: Sincerely, BLACK RIVER PROPERTIES Mr. Brice Martin Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 Re: Proposed Fire District Number 1 Annexation to Tukwila; BRB File No. 1450p /JIM HAWK AND LLOYALURN ,1 ..uron: evucu.ca:.'•rwsvuwY..twr.. M+:.�erarmwr�rn.m pwsrmsb!t;xxs!fZ$ mia' 01:%IN (4lS?t�' 5 I3LACIS "AVM CIJAL?I?Y, Inc. 6808 South 140th SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98178 We are the title holders to the Black River Quarry property as per the attached legal description. We are opposing this annexation. We have a legal committment from Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc. and Stoneway Concrete, a division of Gary Merlino Construction Co., Inc., to purchase this property. They have now taken possession of the site. Their plan is to make the property Disable by quarrying for a few more years, then building a main office, shop and concrete batch plant. They can get their utilities from Empire Way when needed. Tukwila has stated they want only light industrial zoning for this area. This would de -value our property. If we chose to be annexed it would be into Renton since two acres of our property is there now. Crushed Rock Gravel Sand Rip Rap r K.C.B.R.B. FILE it /5 Exhibit# �f That portion of Sections 11, 13 and 14 Township 23 North, Range East, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the South Right-of-Way Line of Beacon Coal Mine Co. Rd. (So. 140th Street) (said Right-of-Way being 60 feet in width, 30 feet each side of centerline) with the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East; Thence East along said South Right-of-Way Line, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1745 (amended by Ordinance No. 1764 and 1928) to an intersection with the Southerly production of the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of 81st Ave. S.; Thence Northerly along said Southerly production of said Easterly Right-of-Way Line and said existing City Limits to an intersection with the Southerly Right-of-Way Line of Empire Way S. (State Road No. 2, SR- 900), said point being 95 feet as measured radially from the centerline of said roadway; Thence Westerly and.Northerly along said Southerly Right-of-Way Line of said Empire Way S., said Right-of-Way varies in width from 50 feet to 95 feet South and West of centerline to an intersection with the East line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14; Thence continuing along said Southerly Right-of-Way Line of Empire Way S. said Right-of-Way varies in width from 50 feet to 125 feet South and West of centerline to an intersection with the North Right-of-Way Line of S. 126th St. (Evans Ave., Berkshire St.) said Right-of-Way being 50 feet in width, situate in the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11; Thence West along said North Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the Easterly Right-of-Way Line of State Road 5; Thence Southerly along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14; Thence continuing along said Easterly Right-of-Way Line of State Road 5 to an intersection with the Northerly Right-of-Way Line of the • Burlington Northern Railroad Company (Pacific Coast Railroad); Thence Southeasterly along said Northerly Right-of-Way Line to an intersection with the North Jine of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 14; PC.C.B.R.B. ALE # /TVO ! Page 1 of 2 Exhibit # '17:.'"if,'•• • 1‘. . r • I I. 7 i JUN 2 2 1988 1 . Thence continuing along said Northerly Right -of -Way Line to an intersection with the Easterly production of the centerline of Edward Ave. (S. 139th Street) as platted in Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts and vacated under Tukwila Ordinance No. 101; Thence Easterly along said Easterly production of said centerline, said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 4040, a distance of 500 feet more or less to an intersection with the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (Steel Hill Road) ; Thence Southeasterly along said centerline and said City of Renton Limits to an intersection with the centerline of 68th Ave. S. (County Road No. 8, Monster Rd.); Thence Southeasterly along said centerline and said existing City of Renton Limits to an intersection with the Southerly Right -of -Way Line of Beacon Coal Mine Rd. situate in the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 13; Thence Northeasterly along said Southerly Right -of -Way Line said line also being the existing limits of the City of Renton as annexed under Ordinance No. 1745 (amended by Ordinance No. 1764 and Ordinance No. 1928) to an intersection with the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 13 and the Point of Beginning. TOGETHER WITH That portion of Lots 11 and 12, Block 4, and Lots 5 and 6, Block 5, Allentown Acres Addition as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 22, records of King County, Washington and that portion of 56th Ave. S. (Black Ave. S.), all lying North of the North Right -of -Way Line of S. 126th St. (Evans Ave. Berkshire St.), West and South of the West and South Right -of- Way Line of Empire Way S. (State Road No. 2) and East of the East Right -of- Way Line of State Road 5. 1F.4.05.AJH:mf 04/25/88 Page 2 of 2 MCB • City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 10, 1988 TO: Fire District No. 1 Task Force FROM: Moira Carr Bradshaw p SUBJECT: PRE - ANNEXATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING Attached are the adopted ordinances which are the result of the numerous hours you spent this winter and then the hearings in the spring before the Planning Commission and City Council. No significant changes were made from your recommendations except for the zoning of the triangular area located east of 42nd Avenue S., north of 116th Avenue S. and west of Burlington Northern in Allentown, as well as the Black River Quarry site in Sub -area 3 to Light Industry and CM Industrial Park. The Boundary Review Board will hold a public hearing on the annexation on Thursday, June 16, 1988, at 7:30 p.m., in the Foster High School Cafeteria. There will be proposals made by Renton and King County for modification to the annexation boundaries, therefore, the BRB will have an integral role, (i.e., Renton will ask for the deletion of Sub -area 3). I will continue to keep you informed. WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. / 7 CITY OF TUKWILA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may at some time in the future be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988 and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and amending the Zoning Code and Zoning Map and that the existing plan, zoning code and plan, and zoning maps, be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4, 1988 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new use zone to accommodate existing, unique, heavy industrial trucking areas that require less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping, and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1988, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. / / 7 , amending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and plan map to provide for a plan for the area in the event of annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Fire District #1 Study Area and is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and to the zoning map which consists of Exhibits B, C. and D hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows: 3296C5/334A Page 1 (7) Truck terminals. A. Section 18.42.020(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dieing, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws. B. Section 18.42.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: C. Section 18.42.030 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. D. Section 18.42.040(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; E. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as .shown on Map 2. F. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 and Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.040 to include areas as shown on Exhibit E. G. Section 18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.045 Height regulations around major airports. For the purposes of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provision of this section, the city adopts the following airport height map: 3296C5/334A A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, 1986, and as the same may be amended. Page 2 H. Section 18.70 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre- existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD- approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof. (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and windload factor of eighty (80) miles per hour. (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. I. Section 18.06.220 of the Tukwila Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or a modular home is not considered a mobile home. J. Section 18.06.240 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.06.240 Dwelling, single- family. "Single- family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 § 1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is considered to be a single - family dwelling. K. Section 18.06 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. L. Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 3296C5/334A Page 3 Sections: CHAPTER 18.43 M -2L DISTRICT - -HEAVY INDUSTRY /SPECIAL LANDSCAPING 18.43.010 Purpose. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. 18.43.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique industrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping in recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. In the M -2L district, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than the following uses, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.42.030 and 18.42.040: (1) Any principally permitted uses in the M -1 district; (2) Any principally permitted uses in the M -2 district; (3) Truck terminals. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit from the city as provided in Chapter 18.64: (1) Conditional uses as provided in the M -1 district; (2) Conditional uses as provided in the M -2 district; (3) General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 of this title. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. In the M -2L district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and maximum height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. M. Table 2, Required Landscape Areas, of Chapter 18.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Zone Landscape Landscape Landscape District (in feet) (in feet) (in feet) M -2L 5 none none Section 4. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: 3296C5/334A A. Office of the City Clerk Page 4 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 3296C5/334A B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: C ITY CLERK, INE ANDERSON OFFIC of THE CITY TTORNEY By , /li[4-, - - I, FI , WITH THE CITY CLERK: 4-4 re PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: f - , - 5 ' PUBLISHED: (, - 42- Fe EFFECTIVE DATE: 4,.. it Pp' ORDINANCE NO.: /467 Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 43' day of , 1988. giamigibiliMPN I vii 'F \\ 1:01111Pit 111 270 1 i0 EIIGPIL f ■■ KiliLL E El "I t ,fir �► N C T O N ,I .14:Iil;ill urlC FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System r m Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A T NORTH CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT A N re 1 C d ' E W :14 cc U. 4 I- cn N z m co 7 .+; " • ' • • ••• :: ••• . . ING COUNTY . . . 11 • *.• . . • • • • • • • •••• . • • % %• .. ... . , . • % , •• • % • .• '• ':•.::•; ..; .. .. .::: ..:::- ,"%••-•.:,:. ...// ..:F "•:: -.. / • • % : ...-. -....., ' • • :::•::. . "...••••"•••■:. • ... ... .. . . , ... .. .:- /..." ...- ',./.. :. .:.*:. ../..-.• - . - .. .... • • • • • • .•• •,. • •• • • ••••• •• • • • .• •- FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 SOW 11111111111 Regional Retail Business C Light Industry M-1 Heavy Industry M 1Z7 INDUSTRIAL PARK CM CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. /t• NORTH Single-family Residence R Low Apartments R 1 Multiple Residoece/Higl - Rm Density EXHIBIT C ATTACHMENT K FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub -Area 2 & 4 J.eaena l 11111111111 S. ■ r r NORTH Single- family Residence R -1 Low Apartments R-4 Multiple Residence /High RMH: Density Professional and Office PO Community Retail Business C -1 Regional Retail Business C-2 Light Industry 14-1 Heavy Industry M-2 Industrial Park CM EXHIBIT D CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,N C. STALZER i ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT L J FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY HEIGHT EXCEPTION im MI NORTH AREA UP TO & INCLUDING 115' weight Permit WI per 11150010 UP TO & INCLUDING 115' with B.AR. approwl per ILIUM EXHIBIT E CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & A$SOC.,NIC. STALZER b ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT M FIGURE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. On 6 , 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed finance No. mtikr , which provides as follows: Adopts zoning regulations, a zoning map and amends the Tukwila Zoning Code to provide for the area described as Fire District No. 1 Study Area; said regulations, map and amendments to become effective upon annexation of the City of Tukwila of said area, or any part thereof; and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of Ri 6 fish s 1/c.. I fie y Dal 3296C2/6/334A SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /47 Z l I ZANDERS ' ON, CITY CLE News - JLtn 42, Orr , 1988. 3359C2/392A CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON / ORDINANCE NO. /4ICc AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area, at some future time, will be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, parts of said area are within the City's planning area and therefore subject to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, existing ordinance nos. 1118 and 1138 provide for land use planning and zoning regulation for two parts of said area, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988, and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and that the existing plan map be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the planning area of the City of Renton includes portions of Sub -Area 3 of the Fire District #1 Study Area and the Tukwila City Council has met with the Renton City Council, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 is characterized by steep slopes, unstable soil conditions and sensitivity to seismic activity according to the King County Seismic Area Map, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 would be more appropriately developed by light industrial /commercial uses, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138 of the City of Tukwila are hereby repealed. Section 2. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map is hereby amended to reflect that the property known as Fire District #1 Study Area and shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby added to such plan map, and the policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and amended in Ordinance No. 1246 and as hereafter amended, shall apply to said area. Section 3. At such time as said described area or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan for the subject area is shown on the map which is attached as "Exhibit B ". Section 5. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of the City Clerk B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 6. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 0. day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: IT CLERK, INE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FIL . WITH THE CITY CLERK: 41.. 4(- Y8 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 6-4- 8T PUBLISHED: 4-42-ST EFFECTIVE DATE: 6 Pf ORDINANCE NO.: 1 41(, 3359C2/392A Page 2 T O N � ' III �I J "num " .. - .. h JIII I,. Ip gllll rrV`' ,,,��0ql �I�Illlllp N I , �II ti11lil III�I � �IIIII�III '411111m7" , . p li 1 ��, � . ,p p a i l � I I I III III �I � f �� , pli �IIIIiII� Ilp �IIN Intl 11 1 W FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Wag I S Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. T NORTH ATTACHMENT A J FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations LCZIDA Low Density Residential High Density Residential Professional/Office 1 77:71 Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Parks and Open Space Public Facility gi:33.333 ■••••••••'. EXHIBIT B CCA lex HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,118C. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT I tIGURE 9 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. "46 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. On 6 , 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed dinance No. /466 , which repeals Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138, amends the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map to add Fire District #1 Study Area, provides for the application to said area of standards for future development, utilization and growth of the City as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and Ordinance No. 1246, and establishes an effective date. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of Pu bltsh ; VajIe1 3359C2/392A MAXINE ANDERSON, CITY CLERK N w5 - JKne. 1.2 19 ST tn?isw. it at,:;2kimfiv 63Wixcd.1:41— r, ronse nn.,,sc,.n ....: ....................,.•........ ,.:«.,,.o,,..,,....»,..,..w,.*: +.,racwraonn r..,,..y. Names+. w.. nn:,. nrx. em»., �nearrz+: rorcnxa: �crc4�..« 3 nw. weF. xiv+ ttv✓. �irrtexauimsFttifsSn :.s' a i: AF( I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, JUNE 9, 1988 (SEE ATTACHED) -- APPROX 834 ADDRESSES Name of Project FIRE DIST. NO. 1 File Number 87 -1 -A OF DISTRLBUT ION declare that: 0 Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice C1 Notice of Action O Official Notice E] Other FIRE DIST #1 BULLETIN RE: BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD HEARING O Other , 19 . BULLETIN BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD HEARING City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION DATE: June 16, 1988 TIME: 7:30 p.m. LOCATION: Foster High School Cafeteri a South 144th & 42nd Ave. South ISSUES: ° King County's request to add the 16th Avenue Bridge and adja- cent areas on both sides of the Duwamish River at the north end of the annexation. ° Conformance of the annexation to the Boundary Review Board decision criteria. ° Renton's request to delete the south part (subarea 3) from the Annexation. PURPOSE OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD: The Board is tasked by state law to guide the logical growth of cities and arbitrate competing interests of that growth. A Public Hearing to that end is being held to gather addi- tional factual information and give affected citizens a final opportunity to be heard. The Board's decision will be made on July 14, 1988. CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /44 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.22 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO BRING TUKWILA LAW INTO CONFORMITY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SOUNDS EMANATING FROM AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT AND AMENDING SECTIONS 8.22.130 AND 8.22.150 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE AN INCONSISTENCY WHEREAS, Federal Regulations preempt the regulation of noise originating from aircraft in flight and noise originating at airports which is directly related to flight operations, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Municipal Code is currently in conflict with Federal Regulations regarding sounds relating to flight operations which are exempt from noise restrictions, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to bring Tukwila law into conformity with Federal Regulations, other local noise ordinances, and the Washington State Administrative Code, and WHEREAS, there is currently a conflict between the provisions of Sections 8.22.130(7) and 8.22.150(9) relating to the unamplified human voice, Section 1. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.150(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.22.150 Sounds exempt at all times. The following sounds are exempt from the provisions of this chapter at all times: 3431C2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: (1) Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly related to flight operations. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (WAC 173.60.050(1)(3) and (4)(b). If the testing or maintenance is performed at Boeing Field /King County International Airport, the aircraft or component shall be entirely within the ultimate airport property line as shown on the map entitled "Boeing Field /King County International Airport - Airport Layout Plan" (prepared December 1, 1967, revised August 1, 1986) at areas designated by the airport manager. It is intended that this map be the reference map regardless of any future changes, provided that the administrator may grant exceptions to this subsection for good cause shown. A copy of the Airport Layout Plan is at the office of the airport manager of Boeing Field /King County International Airport. Page 1 Section 2. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.130(7) is amended to read as follows: Section 3. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.050(9) is hereby amended to read: (9) Sounds caused by natural phenomena. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 41± day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CIT LERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FIL / WITH THE CITY CLERK: 6- 6 8t? PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 6-641 PUBLISHED: L - i.2 • p EFFECTIVE DATE: 6 - /V-Pt ORDINANCE NO.: /46 3431C2 (7) The amplified or unamplified human voice which unreasonably interferes with peace, comfort and repose of property owners or possessors between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. 3431CZ/3 3431C2 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. /We AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.22 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO BRING TUKWILA LAW INTO CONFORMITY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SOUNDS EMANATING FROM AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT AND AMENDING SECTIONS 8.22.130 AND 8.22.150 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE AN INCONSISTENCY On June 6, 1988, the City Council of the City of Tukwila passed Ordinance No. , which amended Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.150(1) to make exempt from the chapter regulating noise certain sounds originating from airplanes in flight and sounds originating at airports which relate to flight operations and further amended Tukwila Municipal Code Sections 8.22.130(7) and 8.22.150(9) to make them consistent. The full text of this ordinance will be mailed without charge to anyone who submits a written request to the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila for a copy of the text. APPROVED by the City Council at their meeting of Pu 1, 11 s h: V alle y 1) a`%1 Z 1 7 44*;-4-' N, CITY CLERK Jane. !4 , 17E1 Page 3 , 1988. GEORGE M. HARTUNG MEADE EMORY LEON C. MISTEREK JOHN E. COLGROVE C. DEAN LITTLE LAWRENCE E. HARD RODNEY J. WALDBAUM D. WILLIAM TOONE DANIEL D. WOO CARL ). CARLSON Dear Woody: LESOURD & PATTEN A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2400 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 -7005 TELEPHONE: (206) 624.1040 TELECOPIER: (206) 624-3087 May 20, 1988 R. W. Wilkinson, Jr. Gogerty and Stark Business /Public Affairs Consultants Suite 300, 2505 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 P. WARREN MARQUARDSON MARIANNE SCHWARTZ O'BARA ROBERT M. KANE, JR. JUDD R. MARTEN JEFFREY C. WISHKO VICTORIA JENSEN BJORKMAN HUGH J. CYIVIS MICHAEL R. KENYON F. A. LiSOURD WOOLVIN PATTEN ROBERT L. PALMER Of COUNSEL I have reviewed your letter to me dated April 22, 1988 (received on May 10) with Rick Beeler and Dwayne Griffin of the City of Tukwila. I have not yet had an opportunity to discuss the letter with any representatives of the Tukwila Fire or Police Departments. It had been my hope that we would have been provided with specific City or County ordinances in those jurisdictions in which your clients have done business, setting forth specific examples of permit procedures which are used by other jurisdic- tions and which are acceptable to your clients. Tukwila has not had the resources or the experience that larger jurisdictions such as King County, the City of Seattle, or even the City of Renton may have had with supervision of facilities of the type utilized by your clients, and we are looking for specific guid- ance in these areas. From the perspective of the City, there are a number of minimum health and safety standards which are required by state or federal law which must be observed by local jurisdictions. Among the principal examples of this are the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. In addition, there are other codes such as the electrical code. By law, the City must adopt the provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code, or have local standards which are more stringent. As a result, the City has adopted both those codes and is obligated to enforce them as minimum health and safety standards. All property owners are required to comply with these standards, as they are in any other jurisdiction in the state of Washington. R. W. Wilkinson, Jr. May 20, 1988 Page Two The electrical code enjoys a different status. Enforcement of the electrical code is a matter regulated by state law. As a result, the current arrangement which The Boeing Company may have involving a "master permit" arrangement with the State as it applies to electrical work should also apply in Tukwila. With respect to a "master building permit" concept, the City of Tukwila is prepared to explore the implementation of such a concept as long as it can fulfill the minimum standards imposed on the City and its property owners under the provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code. From the City's perspective, this raises three fundamental concerns: 1. Providing satisfactory assurance that the provisions of the UBC and UFC are being met at all times. 2. Determining what aspects of the regulatory compliance enforcement can be delegated by the City to a third party. 3. Assuring that any code compliance procedures used in the City of Tukwila minimize potential liability to the City due to claims of negligence or inadequate code enforcement. In my opinion, it is lawful for the City of Tukwila to contract with a third party to provide code compliance assistance. For example, Tukwila currently requires that all building plans be reviewed by a private company to be checked for structural code compliance. I believe it may be possible for a similar arrangement to be made regarding compliance with other provisions of the building code. For example, hiring independent inspectors to be sure that foundations are properly laid and poured, to be sure that corridors are being constructed of adequate width and a location near exits, and similar matters. Either the City could contract with specific consultants or engineering firms for these services, or the City could maintain a list of such independent third party consultants whose written verification of code compliance would be acceptable to the City. By utilizing such independent third party consultants, it may be possible to expedite the permit review process by having the applicant submit materials as approved by these people. Unfortunately, it has been the experience of the City that it cannot rely on the rep- resentations of the property owner, or the property owner's • rn :x^.�rc�...v��: ;cnr.�rauv.rr.�� ��r. �, �,.. �...., r.,, �...,,,..,:........ e,. �............ �.. �., w�...«,. �,+« �. �o,•, �.. rw, Yrrr r. �.. w, �,. �,..., �>.. �, ur.. r. e# w: r+ �reura::: ertt�' S;?fl•.e R. W. Wilkinson, Jr. May 20, 1988 Page Three agent, that all plans submitted comply with all applicable codes. It is necessary to have an independent evaluation. Compliance with the Uniform Fire Code may be more difficult since there may be a specific requirement that the City have uniform fire personnel perform these services. That is a matter which would need to be reviewed. In essence, the major issue which needs to be addressed is how to expedite a permit process which is required by state law in a manner which will not create additional problems of liabil- ity for the City and its employees. I think the City is prepared to review its current practices in order to streamline the build- ing permit process for all applicants. A major element in that process must be to assure that there is adequate staffing to perform these functions. In other words, given the fact that there are going to be minimum permit procedures to be accomplished, the main emphasis should be to work on a process which would expedite the compliance process. This, in turn, will depend on the City's willingness and ability to provide adequate personnel to staff an expedited process. To a certain extent, the staffing requirements of the City could be lessened by reliance on inde- pendent third party agencies. I recommend that we meet at your earliest convenience to discuss these matters further and to begin the process of estab- lishing a more efficient permit processing and compliance procedure. LEH:ja cc: Mayor Gary Van Dusen Council President Harris Very truly yours, LeSOURD & PATTEN, P.S. • Lawrence E. Hard May 13, 1988 Rainier National Bank P.O. Box 3966, Seattle, Washington 98124 — 3966 Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RAnTERBANK® Attn: Moira Carr Bradshaw Re: Proposed Annexation - Fire District #1, et al. Dear Ms. Bradshaw: Thank you for working with John Richards, Staff Architect, to resolve the remaining issues of concern regarding the proposed annexation which includes a portion of the Rainier Bank property at 12400 East Marginal Way. I can tell you that Rainier Bank very much appreciates your thoughtful, courteous and very professional consideration of our existing property requirements. As you may be aware, Rainier Bank has occasion to conduct business in a great many communities throughout this state and others. We do not always experience the high level of consideration and concern that you and the rest of the City gave to us. Therefore, it is with great appreciation that Rainier Bank says "THANK YOU! ". Having experienced these benefits of working with a concerned and effective city staff, as well as with the Planning Commission, is good reason to consider annexation a benefit. Such consideration, together with the Planning Commission's recommendations that the Rainier Bank property be classified in Land -use Zone M -1 with an attached 65' Height Overlay Zone to include provision for Board of Architectural Review approval for conditional building heights up to a maximum of 115 feet, has satisfied Rainier Bank's concerns. Annexation into the City of Tukwila appears to be a fundamental sound business decision. At this time, then, conditional upon the City Council's actions being in accord with the Planning Commission's recommendation, Rainier Bank requests that the entirety of its property be included within the boundary of the above referenced annexation. For your use, I am attaching the legal descriptions for the properties that are at this time partially within the annexation area. Rainier National Bank Ms. Bradshaw May 13, 1988 Page 2 MDM:mb • If you have any questions, please call me. Again, a hearty thank you for your help. Sincerely, CAK- M. glean My Vice President and Manager Design and Construction Property Management Group: N06 -2 (206) 621 -6581 e 7604290388 EXHIBIT "A" THAT PORTION OF TRACT 1, 22, 31 AND 32+ RIVERSI c: INTERURBAN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 10 OF PLATS, PAGE 74, IN KING COUNTY+ WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; op BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF PRIMARY STATE op HIGHWAY NO. 1+ FOSTER INTERCHANGE TO SOUTH 118TH STREET+ AS O CONDEMNED UNDER SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 646846, THAT BEARS Cn SOUTH 04 °33'59" EAST 165.03 FEET DISTANT FROM THE POINT OF (V CURVATURE OF THE WEST MARGIN, HIGHWAY ENGINEERS STATION 76 +05.30, V. SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN N D TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER I~ AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7506090402; THENCE SOUTH 04 °33'59" EAST ALONG SAID .':MARGIN 615.17 FEET TO A POINT LYING 110 FEET WESTERLY OF AND OPPOSITE ENGINEERS STATION 68+25; THENCE SOUTH 58 °17'25" WEST 230.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21 °32'52" EAST 36.80 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 32 OF THE RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS; THENCE NORTH 89 °17'24" WEST 476.97 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACTS 31 AND 32 TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY AS ESTABLISHED BY v'ARRANTY DEED FOUND IN KING COUNTY RECORDS, KING COUNTY RECORDER'S NUMBER 7412090465; THENCE NORTH 18 °38'24" WEST 12.65 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 12 °54'24" WEST 443.48 FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 10 ° 07'24" WEST 333.7e FEET ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN TO THE SC'JTH CORNER OF OPTION AGREEMENT RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 7506090402; THENCE SOUTH 89 °17'24" EAST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACTS 31 AND 32+ RIVERSIDE INTERURBAN TRACTS. A DISTANCE OF 774.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Subject to easement ,r construction, erection, iteration, improvement, repair and maintenance of guy wires and anchors overhead utilities, �j in favor of The City of Seattle, recorded July 26, 1972, Auditor's No. 7207260478, affecting a portion of said Lot 22. Subject to: Restrictions contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded January 23, 1973, under recorder's No. 7301230400 as follows: Grantee shall maintain and operate any such facilities constructed, maintained or otherwise operated on said premises for the accommodation ap of the traveling public or business users of any Federal -aid highway 01 such as eating, sleeping, rest, recreation and vehicle servicing in ON compliance with all other requirements imposed pursuant to Title 49, (y Code of Federal regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A, Office of the Secretary of Transportation, Part 21 "49 C.F.R. Part 21 ", CD CD and said said regulations may be amended. Subject to: Restrictions contained in deed from the State of Washington recorded January 23, 1973, under recorder's No. 7301230400 as follows: Grantor, its successors or assigns shall have no right of ingress and egress to, from and between Primary State Iligwhay No. 1. "SR 99 ", and said premises, nor shall the grantor, its successors or assigns, be entitle to compensation for any loss of light, view and air occasioned by the location, construction, maintaince or operation of said highway. Subject to: Relinquishment of right of access to State Highway, and of (, light, view and air, under terms of deed to the State of Washington, recorded May 28, 1965, Auditor's No. 5884778, and as condemned under Superior Court Cause No. 646846. Subject to: Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon said premises, as granted by deed,to King County, Auditor's No. 74120905.. 8502220513 AND EXHIBIT -el. DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 and 34 in Block 8 of Riverton, a replat of part of Riverside Interurban Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, records of King County; '4 TOGETHER WITH the East 1/2 of vacated 37th Avenue South adjoining Lot 34, as vacated by Ordinance No. 1863 and recorded under Recording No, 740211 -5011; EXCEPT the North 10 feet of said Lots 1 and 34 conveyed to SR King County for road by deed recorded under Recording No. 740104 -0466; AND EXCEPT that portion lying East of the West margin of East Marginal Way, as established by deed recorded under Recording No. 740104 -0467; Lots 1 through 8, in Block 7, AND the North 10 feet of Lot 24, AND ALL of Lots 25 through 32, in Block 7; AND Lots 2 through 8, in Block 8, AND Lots 27 through 33, in Block 8; ALL in Riverton, a replat of part of Riverside Interurban Tracts, as per plat recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, records of King County; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated 37th Avenue South adjoining Blocks 7 and 8, as vacated by Ordinance No. 1863 and recorded under Recording No. 740211 -5011; EXCEPT that portion of said Blocks 7 and 8 conveyed to King County for 37th Avenue South by deed recorded under Recording No. 740104 -0465; AND EXCEPT that portion of Block 8 lying East of the West margin of East Marginal Way, as established by deed recorded under Recording No. 740104 -0463; AND EXCEPT the North 10 feet of Lots 1 and 32 in Block 7 conveyed for road by deed recorded under Recording No. 740104 -0464; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. . ..�a., g r .• , 'iF , • ,�l-r.> ,e ';.t,...p. r .� ..Y.q> v •^�' rt.". rN Y�''? ';� -�% .:. Y�?, �, � i,: 3. 4", ...;t;.1rt,:�'�:i�ti.1Ce: �.+1� non r v.'trt�.A�.esIr 2 5s... k.. �; �Pir,.,::- x: i u%,•,_ t. ae�s6. ve• rx: r'.:7'[7t:'. ^.zc�sr.:Tm*��x.'�" sir.-' 5w�C�t' �, �. 7:;.: er�.:t:wac:e�nt3': *,Ae;.x,...e? Ott".:' �r1flS'. vui. �_ �m. �s�X' �i ..,.��:`•�x5�n�"�`t�,�.x.�tX. �r.f:_, ......, Q Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [I Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [r Planning Commission Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [[ Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on Task Force Members Name of Project FIRE DISTRICT # 1 TASK FORCE File Number R7-1 -A AF OF D I ST°'=`BUT I ON I, BEVERLY L. ROGERS hereby declare that: E] Determination of Nonsignificance E] Mitigated Determination of Non - significance • Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [� Notice of Action O Official Notice El Other SEE ATTACHED C1 Other Signature May 11, 1988 , 19 . '�" " w '4 City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 1988 TO: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TASK FORCE FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING Attached is the packet being transmitted to the City Council on the above subject and reflects actions taken to date. In a 1986 Interlocal Agreement between the cities of Tukwila and Renton, future annexations along Tukwila's northeast border would be discussed between the two cities (see Section 9, page 2 of attached Interlocal Agreement). During a recent meeting between the two cities, the proposed heavy industrial zoning of the sub- area 3 was discussed. The Tukwila Council verbally indicated and the Renton Council concurred that a less intense designation and zone of CM Industrial Park would be more appropriate for the steep slopes and compatible with surrounding land uses. Discussion by the Council on the final ordinances and a change to reflect the above will be made on May 16, 1988. If you have comments regarding sub -area 3, please attend the Council meeting Monday or call me at 433 -1848. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL ANNEXATIONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila ", and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton ". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 , which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. / , which calls for certain property currently located wit n enton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit 8 to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit 8 to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50%. 3. S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the CAG 046 -86 Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50 %. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P -1 Channel. The P -1 Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P -1 Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P -1 Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR -181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR -181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR -181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent ,with the boundary line shown on Exhibit tt tached hereto and incorporated herein by this refer "' it e or in full. Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one-:half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50 %. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P -1 Channel. The P -1 Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P -1 Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P -1 Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should: have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of - the::ftciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street /:S. 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and future widening for the bridge. Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR -181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR -181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR -181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent with the boundary line shown on Exhibit ttached hereto and incorporated herein by this refer t e or in full. Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 I 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DATED this // day of eac, 1986. CITY OF D T K IL '/L. ii - ER N, LERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTO • CITY OF RENTON ah ' gLi.npoee% BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: EY CI Y ATTORNEY c a0 At,w -- LAWRENCE J. WARREN. CITY ATTORNEY SECTION - TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MDC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MDC (p) 2.91 1.14 • 9 MDC (p) 43 3.0 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) - 44717 - 21 MDC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) 10.47 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) TUTU 24 (portion) 5.44 44. 0 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 ' 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 13 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 I 5.54 1 36 1 3.09 TOTAL 1 45 parcels 1 101.65 EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. ure 1 Renton -Tukwi Boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton Dec Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton 2000' SECTION - TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot 12 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 C.. EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. Fure 1 Renton -Tukwl 3oundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton .w. Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton ■ +M 2000 EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila- Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions aariiiil yA , ;.:� it ,11t '+raw HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Attached hereto are: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 31, 1988, APRIL 14, 1988, SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT APRIL 14, 1988, PROPOSED ORDINANCES TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN MAP AND ZONING CODE TEXT AND MAP. The action taken by the Planning Commission is briefly described below: PLANNING DEPARTMENT MASTER FILE NO.: 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA APPLICANT: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL LAND USE REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 29. 1988 LOCATION: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION STUDY AREA NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF THE CITY. (SEE ATTACHMENT A) AND CITY OF TUKWILA. REQUEST: AREA -WIDE AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CODE AND MAP TO PROVIDE PRE - ANNEXATION ORDINANCES FOR SUBJECT ANNEXATION. PLANMG COMMISSION ACTION: ( SEE ATTACHMENT CITY COUNCIL DEADLINE: MAY 16, 1988 SECOND PUBLIC HEARING REASONS FOR RECOMMENL;TION: 1. PROVIDES COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA. 2. FOR THE MAJORITY, IS SUPPORTED BY THE FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION (23 /LUR) TASK FORCE. 3. FOR THE MAJORITY, IS RESPONSIVE TO THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD MARCH 31, 1988 AND APRIL 14, 1988. Respectfully submitted, Moira Carr Bradshaw Secretary IIs'.�: �1 {•IS..�:F.int..-:1�' +.V.�:i .3i[.....vr H`F.i�u IBtii� l:y.�'!JJ'e l:4}■:L.`9ti r: may... Ft viRM >rw an✓ it. wv.. e+. w. n. w,.. erw. uru... m..... ewa.... x.+. .w�v.vrn+Yw.Mr9.r.4.MNnw..+GW.a t+hu rtmvuunvt�z^.t+ae� >.r.Y V?r1'H£L` 4:.7n.'!}:rJ:.r.�S},'n�? i�C?t}:::.r}.^ �{:FNi5bN+1� YLW:' 1 �... PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Recommend approval of amending the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as shown on Attachment I with a modification to show Light Industry for area east of 42nd Avenue S. north of 116th Avenue S. and west of Burlington Northern. Recommend approval of zoning as shown on Attachments J, K and L with a modification to show M -1, Light Industrial for area east of 42nd Avenue S., north of 116th Avenue E. and west of Burlington Northern Rail yard and an M -2L District as shown on Attachment N. Recommend approval of amendment to the Zoning Code to include: 1. Steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining consumalde electrode melting, open die hammer, or press forging as permitted uses in the M -2 zone. 2. Training as an accessory use in the M -2 Zone. 3. Truck terminals as permitted uses in the M -2 zone. 4. Include area as shown on Attachment M in Height Exception area: up to and including 115 feet. 5. Add a section regulating heights around major airports. 6. Allow manufactured homes to replace legal, grandfathered mobile and manufactured homes. 7. Amend Zoning Code to create an M -2L zone. 8. Include area shown on Attachment "O" in Height Exception Area: up to 65 feet outright and authorization above 65 feet up to and including 115 feet subject to Board of Architectural review and approval. to: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION . March 31, 1988 (Corrected Minutes) -April 14, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Knudson, Haggerton, and Hamilton. Mr. Larson and Mr. Kirsop were absent. Representing the staff were Rick Beeler and Moira Bradshaw. MINUTES 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA: Public Hearing - Annexation area -wide amendments 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code (annexation area and City -wide amendments) Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained the process that has been used in responding to the request for annexation. Moira Bradshaw, staff representative, entered into record Exhibits 1 (Staff Report) and 2 (letter from Spider Staging Corporation with respect to the sanitary sewer; which will not be considered in this public hearing). She explained the Fire District #1 annexation petition area and its four sub - areas. In sub -area 1, which is industrial 'there are not many problems between the City and King County's designation. In sub -area 2 there are light manufacturing, retail, a non - conforming auto shop, apartments, and community center. The City would duplicate the zoning except for a transitional zone of Office /PO on Ryan Way and for an extension of the high density residential R -4 to include the two remaining lots on the low apartment block. The remainder is proposed for low density and R -1 -7.2 In sub -area 3 in the Empire Way neighborhood there are apartments and a mobile home park, commercial store type uses as well as light and heavy manufacturing uses. No changes are proposed, although Renton's comprehensive plan is for a green belt area for the southeast tip of the area. Ms. Bradshaw explained the comprehensive plan and zoning changes which would be in sub -area 4 to create comparable zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 Page 2 Ms. Bradshaw reviewed the zoning code amendments. Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, expressed concern with the height limitation. They would like to have a height limit that would give them the ability to redevelop at the current height limit. Dan Wolfe, Chairman of the Annexation Task Force, 11821 44th Avenue South, stated they would like another zone district of M -3 which would eliminate landscaping in a specified area. Woody Wilkinson, 2505 3rd Avenue, representing Jorgenson Steel, Boeing and Rhone Polene said they are interested in the passage of the annexation packet and have worked consistently with the Task Force to prepare these recommendations. Patrick Dillon, 3278 36th Avenue SW, expressed desire to have the City take a look at the property on the sharp bend of the river and resolve the zoning now so they would not have to wait to take action. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, entered Exhibit #3 (Highline Plan), Exhibit #4 (three zoning map boards), Exhibit #5 (Slides), Exhibit #6 (Drawings, Exhibit #7 (Revised staff recommendations regarding manufactured homes), Exhibit #8 (photo maps of the Helstrom properties). Mr. Dillon explained the present use of the property and his wanting it to be light manufacturing. Chi -Tai Chu, 4431 NE 23rd Court, Renton, inquired of his area, which is R -1 low density. Robert Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 6th Avenue, Seattle, stated he is attorney for McConky Development Company, and they would like to support the Task Force recommendation that a new M -3 zone be created. Neil Roblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South, stated they have a family business of trucks and distribute truck parts and equipment. Scott Traverso, 11025 SE 60th, Renton, objected to a 15' landscape setback preventing room to develop. Jack Minnehan 11901 E. Marginal Way South, stated a 15' landscape setback would put them out of business. Ed Wayvadbty, 1 52nd Avenue South, expressed the desire for M -1 zoning on lots fronting 44th Place across from Union Tank Works and backing up to Burlington Northern. Saul Shapiro, 12929 Empire Way South, stated that the Tukwila code does not address the special reeds of mobile homes in this area, therefore special considerati may need to be made. Mobile Homes provide valuable housing for low income amilies. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map at 9:15 p.m. RECESS Chairman Coplen declared a five - minute recess. The meeting was called back to order with Commissioners present as previously listed. PLANNING COMMISSIO March 31, 1988 Page 3 Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:25 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, stated page 13 of the Staff Report deals with heights. They would like to continue with the King County zoning as is suggested under discussion page 13. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:33 p.m. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE HEIGHT UP TO AND INCLUDING 115' ON AREA DESIGNATED ON ATTACHMENT M. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Rick Beeler stated height exception could be considered at another meeting. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO INCLUDE THE AREA NORTH OF 116TH EAST OF 42ND AND WEST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN IN AN M -1 ZONING DISTRICT AND A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION BASED ON THE GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE RAILROAD AND THE TWENTY -FOUR HOUR BUSINESSES AND BASED ON THE FACT THIS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. MOTION PASSED, WITH MR. HAMILTON VOTING NO. Chairman Coplen introduced discussion on the request for a new M-3 type of designation. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated that the concern is with redevelopment of the existing businesses. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE M -3 CLASSIFICATION BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING THIS MEETING AND IT BE ON THE AREA SHOWN BY STAFF. * Rick Beeler stated this issue could be brought back with a purpose statement. *MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BY MR. KNUDSON WITH THE APPROVAL OF MR. HAGGERTON WHO SECONDED THE MOTION. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1988. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE WARD ZONING CODE MAP AS PROPOSED AND AMENDED BY COMMISSION AND ZONING. CO''AMENDMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE TWO BLOCKS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS; AND THE M=3 ZONE, MOBILE HOMES, AND HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE RAINIER BANK. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. RECESS (10:40 p.m.) MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE MEETING UNTIL APRIL 14, 1988 AT 8:00 P.M. FOR CONSIDERATION OF THESE ITEMS. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Respectfully submitted, Norma Booher, Secretary FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Leacnd sealwalm Study Area Boundary NORTH Proposed "M -2L" District , CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH a ASSOC.,MIC. STALZER i ASSOCIATES TDA P C. ATTACHMENT N FIGURE 1 ,.:,:�f. �:,�Si��%1.51. 3' �l�$:,•' efdlC; +r'.f+;H:.7.:i ;- '- '.,.�- �e�vcx • I, JOANNE JOHNSON J Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting [� Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [[ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet • Planning Commission Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision Agenda Packet • Notice of Application for [] Other Shoreline Management Permit [I Shoreline Management Permit Other FIRE DISTRICT #1 (BROCHURE MAILING) was mailed to each of the following addresses on TUESDAY, MAY 10, 1988 , 19 . (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project FIRE DISTRICT #1 AFL DAV I T OF D ISTQcAUT ION File Number 87 -1 —A -, . - -- - -- .. �. 4>.......... �n. 9,.<... w. wvam. melmcutx +'sl�' �'i�i, hereby declare that: O Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [� Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action El Official Notice INTRODUCTION The City has adopted annexation policies that are receptive to annexation. Decisions must be made by both the city and the residents and businesses to be annexed, after thorough review and careful thought on services and needs. This brochure was prepared by the City of Tukwila to answer commonly asked questions regarding annexa- tion. Many answers are based on existing City Council policies and programs. In the county as well as the city, elective representatives change and programs/ policies are revised and updated: therefore, the answers may change with time. POLICE AND FIRE What will happen to police response time if I annex? Tukwila's police response time is now an average of three minutes for emergency calls and seven to eight minutes for non - emergency calls. King County response time for emergency calls is seven to eight minutes and for non - emergency calls 14 - 42 minutes. What about fire protection? Tukwila provides fire protection, prevention, and public education services to residents and businesses in an annexed area. If a county fire district's livelihood is jeopardized by proposed annexation, negotiations to ensure fire protection for remaining unannexed areas are undertaken. ENTERING TUKWILA? QUESTIONS & ANSWERS ....,, ..n. r.. ,,,. 3,a:e•�,;n;n;r_ „.:,....,..,ortiS;:S�I'i.aX i °ti'_i.:::`,:'i`i':t.`•;.a��:r, MARCH 1988 MPARATIVE� POLICE ; The biggest part of my local tax bill is my property tax. Will my property tax go up or down if I annex? Property taxes in the City of Tukwila are slightly lower than in King County. For example, on a $100,000 home, the property tax in Tukwila is $47 -$127 less annually, depending on whether existing City bonded indebtedness is assumed and on your current tax rate for school and fire districts. What is "bonded indebtedness ?" "Bonded indebtedness" is a debt that Tukwila voters have approved in previous elections. This existing debt is being used to purchase the Foster Golf Course and will be paid for by 1998. In 1987, this indebted- ness was 16 cents per $1,000 of assessed value. As shown in the illustration, even with this indebtedness added, the property tax rate in Tukwila is lower than the rate in unincorporated King County. Do you have to accept bonded indebtedness if you vote to annex? It will be a separate ballot vote from the annexation question. Are there any other changes in taxes that I should know about? The City of Tukwila does not have any additional taxes on property, business or utilities, other than property tax. The sales tax in King County has just been increased to 8.1 %. The sales tax in Tukwila is 8.1%. TAX RATE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TUKWILA & KING COUNTY 1987 Average Assessed Home Value $65,000 Kigg Countyz$230.30* :urface;Water 'Includes surface water tax How will the zoning change if the area is annexed? The City will adopt a pre- annexation ordinance providing Tukwila zoning districts comparable to King County districts. What are the major development differences between King County and Tukwila codes? The major difference between unincorporated King County and Tukwila is that Tukwila has more restrictive standards for minimum setbacks and maximum building heights. Mobile homes are not allowed as single - family dwelling units outside of mobile home parks. The City will be reviewing their current restric- tion during its pre- annexation zoning process. What will happen to buildings that do not conform to City zoning standards? Buildings that do not currently meet City setback, height or lot coverage requirements, can be main- tained by the property owner. Expansions of a building will be subject to the new standards of the City. If the building is destroyed, the new replacement building will have to meet City standards. Noncon- forming residential structures including mobile homes may continue as they exist now and may be replaced after a natural disaster. Can I keep my horse and chickens if I annex to Tukwila? Yes, livestock, small animals and fowl are allowed in Tukwila. Tukwila health standards require a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet to keep animals; how- ever, if you currently keep animals and then annex into the City, you do not have to comply with the lot size limit. I have a boat and trailer that I use for vacations. May I park them in front of my house, in the yard, or on the street? Recreational vehicles may be parked in your yard and on the adjacent street if it will not impair the safe flow of traffic on the street. 4 ton vehicles used for commercial purposes are not permitted in residential zones. Will I be allowed to continue my home occupation? Any business operating in compliance with all existing regulations may continue as a grandfathered use. For new businesses, Tukwila defines a home occupation as incidental to the primary use of the house as a residence and is carried on by a member of the family residing in the home. The conditions for home occu- pations can be obtained when applying for a Tukwila Business license. • a+ttl,.h7s SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR FIRE DISTRICT #1 POLICE AND FIRE Will the Tukwila Police Department increase the number of patrol officers to cover the newly annexed area? Due to the expanded configuration of the City, an additional patrol district will most likely be added and staffed. What about fire protection and emergency services? The City Fire Department currently provides protec- tion and emergency services to the District through a 10 -year agreement. If the entire fire district is annexed, the District would be merged into the City, which would assume ownership of all the District's assets. If the Boundary Review Board modifies the annexa- tion boundaries, the District and its commissioners would oversee fire protection for any district area outside the annexed area. Protection would likely continue under a contractual basis as is currently provided. STREETS AND UTILITIES What improvements does King County have planned for the annexation areas? Three capital improvement projects are planned by the County for the area: 1. Surface water pump station for Allentown — 1991 -1992 2. East Marginal Way between Seattle and Boeing Access Road — an additional 12 -foot lane, curb, gutter and sidewalks — 1990. 3. East Marginal Way between Boeing Access Road and Interurban — widen from 2 to 5 lanes and replace bridge — 1988. What will happen to these projects if these areas annex? East Marginal Way between the Boeing Access Road and Interurban Avenue should be completed by the time the annexation is effective. The other two would be considered for inclusion and ranking in Tukwila's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). What is the future of District No. 25? Separate from the annexation process has been a study which, among other things, is recommending that Water District No. 25 be dissolved and ukwila, Water District No. 125, and/or Seattle assume water service for patrons of the District's area. If Water District No. 25 is dissolved and I were to receive water service from the City of Tukwila, how would the rates compare? For an average family of 4 using 1000 cubic feet of water, Tukwila's rate is $12.00 a month versus $12.20 a month in Water District 25. RESIDENTIAL — WD No. 25 (bi- monthly) Tukwila (monthly) COMMERCIAL — WD No. 25 (bi- monthly) Tukwila (monthly) $16.00 up to 800 cubic feet, then 70( per 100 cubic feet thereafter $4.00 plus 80( per 100 cubic feet $48.00 up to 800 cubic feet, then 70C per 100 cubic feet thereafter (5/8" meter) $13.50 plus 99t per 100 cubic feet (1" meter) Tukwila offers reduced rates of one -half for low income seniors or low income permanently disabled individuals. PARKS AND RECREATION If the area is annexed, what will happen to the King County Park property and Pea Patch at 42nd Avenue along the Duwamish River? The City's Park and Open Space Plan identifies Allentown Park (Earlington Park) as a needed improvement. If King County agrees to deed the property to the City and the City accepts, the opera- tion of the Pea Patch would continue and a neighbor- hood park may eventually be developed. What will happen to the Duwamish Park owned by the South Central School District? No change would occur, It would remain the respon- sibility of the school district. Will the annexation affect the development of the Green RiverlDuwamish 7Yail? No. Tukwila will assume responsibility for develop- ment of the trail within the annexed area and continue coordination efforts with the County. • Allentow FIRE DISTRICT #1 F ANNEXATION STREETS AND UTILITIES Will the streets be improved and undergrounding of utilities be provided? A street improvement program is incorporated in the six -year Capital Improvement Program. The program is evaluated on a yearly basis by the City Council for funding and after study and consideration of commu- nity needs. ,,,• Ti.I M. .nv,nb,v. n If I have an operating septic system, will the City of Tukwila require that I connect to a sewer system? If there is a sanitary sewer line within 250 feet of any property upon which there is a building for human occupancy, a connection to the sewer system can be required (Tukwila Municipal Code 14.12.030). It is not City practice to require this connection unless the King County Health Department condemns the septic system. A similar situation exists in unincorporated areas of King County. If you have a failing residential septic system and are within 330 feet of a sewer line, you can be required by the County to connect to the sanitary sewer system. Tukwila does not regulate septic tanks, you will continue to contact the King County Health Department. How does the City decide where sidewalks will be installed? In Tukwila, sidewalks are required as part of a com- mercial /industrial site's development. Sidewalks are not required on residential lots unless a new subdivi- sion is created or the street is improved. `_ q ::: ^rxl,,arl",•- +1;�.,v,Tjw!tY; �,wr`;i.S,iJ S3 >nr y4" .....-... . ..........-. mu. ...,,. ••• • /... 1........ ...., .,,....- ...,�..��...n. If my area annexes, will the City of Tukwila provide my sewer and water service? Annexation will normally not affect your current water or sewer provider. There are many special purpose sewer and water districts currently operating within the City limits. If over 60% of a sewer or water district's area is within the annexed area, the District and Tukwila may consider an agreement for the City to assume their responsibilities. What if I am not currently served by any sewer or water district? If you are not within any district's service area, then upon annexation you would be a part of Tukwila's sewer and/or water utility. You are not charged anything unless you actually receive water or sewer service. What effect will the annexation have on street lighting costs? You currently pay for your own street lighting. The general method of payment is through your Water District which has an agreement with Puget Power or Seattle City Light to include the street lighting charges on your water bill. Presently, upon annexation, the City of Tukwila assumes street lighting costs. RECREATION AND THE ARTS What community interest programs are available in Tukwila? A full range of youth, adult and senior activities are available at the Tukwila Community Center, parks and local schools. An informational brochure of the programs and special events is sent to all residents of the City four times a year. The programs are, however, open to County residents as well. Tukwila owns and operates the Foster Golf Course and recently adopted special rates for residents of the City. Fort Dent is within the City limits but is a regional park owned and operated by King County. The City has an active Arts Commission that sponsors a yearly fall /winter /spring series of entertainers at City Hall in the Council Chambers. In the summer, a Brown Bag Concert series — "Peanut Butter and Jam" — is held at various outdoor locations in town during the lunch hour. GENERAL Can I continue to haul my own garbage after annexation? You may continue to haul your own garbage after annexation. The City presently offers a semi - annual free haul pass to the dump for residents of the City and an annual household hazardous waste clean -up. Who collects garbage in the City of Tukwila? The City does not have a franchise agreement with any collector. Whoever currently collects your garbage may continue to do so. After annexation, what will be my opportunities to participate in local government? Following annexation, area residents will be eligible to serve on the City's Park Commission, Arts Commis- sion, Library Advisory Board, Sister City Committee, Civil Service Commission, Planning Commission and Board of Adjustment. Residents will also be eligible to vote and run for the City Council and Mayoral positions. All City residents are eligible to vote for their King County Council representative, County Executive, Port Commissioner and other regional positions. Annexa- tion will not change your ability to vote for these positions. A quarterly community newsletter, the "Hazelnut;' is sent to residents and businesses of the City to keep everyone abreast of community events, capital improvement projects, parks improvements, recreation programs, and City services. What happens to schools with annexation? Nothing happens to schools. Annexation does not affect the boundaries of school districts and it has no effect on which school a child will attend. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 REPRESENTATION OF POPULATION KING COUNTY District 5 1 Representative for 198,000 CITY OF TUKWILA Miff Council Positions at Large 7 Representatives for 4,780 (based on current 1987 population) . BULK RATE U.S. POSTAGE PAID TUKWILA, WA PERMIT # 12698 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM City Council President Harris Rick Beeler, Planning Director May 10, 1988 Fire District No.1 Interlocal Agreement with Renton Pursuant to the May 9, 1988 Council meeting the following is the tentative draft list of issues to be discussed with the Renton City Council President as a follow-up to tne April 28, 1988 jbint council meeting. l may not have ali of the changes suggested by our council, but this is very close. We can make changes at any time you like. '` . * Both cities will jointly fund construction of Oaksdale Avenue. * Renton is the logical utility service provider. * Tukwila is the logical short-term fire service provider. * Renton supports the annexation to Tukwila. If the Boundary Review Board deletes Subarea Renton will immediately initiate annexation pt the area • Tukwila will zon72 tne area C-M (Industrial ParT)- * Both cities oppose the King County ERR incinerator being located on the Black River Quarry site. No prioritization was given to these points only becau the Council did not express a clear concensus on priorities. However, your perogative includes emphasizing some issues over others i your discussion with •Renton. If you 'f7 I can put this memo in another form for correspondence from you to Renton, including any changes would k you wou make. 4 c 3. ..H:.:;,r• "i>, ..jc„ .��.:i ° i N:,x, .�a`i. i ?f.:c;.' i�, City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 •rr +s °�: r., ... .. r� 1• n:;r Zwws«P,x' «i.rr . sr.-.: r11.: u�rre° a�; rt+ racxr>n c: xuna. r! •err:.wu +y1^..ttt:4^.zr, N�St ^, .Tr:2•.., .c. .lr.x n.Y.; .�i' ", i .�Y'.'�,�' iG�,: ...,...,kk .s.. .:.. .r. r� .., ,. MEMORANDUM DATE: May 10, 1988 TO: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TASK FORCE FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AND PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING Attached is the packet being transmitted to the City Council on the above subject and reflects actions taken to date. In a 1986 Interlocal Agreement between the cities of Tukwila and Renton, future annexations along Tukwila's northeast border would be discussed between the two cities (see Section 9 page 2 of attached Interlocal Agreement). During a recent meeting between the two cities, the proposed heavy industrial zoning of the sub- area 3 was discussed. The Tukwila Council verbally indicated and the Renton Council concurred that a less intense designation and zone of CM Industrial Park would be more appropriate for the steep slopes and compatible with surrounding land uses. Discussion by the Council on the final ordinances and a change to reflect the above will be made on May 16, 1988. If you have comments regarding sub -area 3, please attend the Council meeting Monday or call me at 433 -1848. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT REGARDING RECIPROCAL ANNEXATIONS THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, hereinafter referred to as "Tukwila ", and the City of Renton, hereinafter referred to as "Renton ". WHEREAS, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila are authorized by Chapter 39.34 RCW to enter into agreements for the purpose of interlocal cooperation, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila City Council has passed Resolution No. 1008 , which indicates Tukwila's willingness to accept annexation to Tukwila of certain property currently located within Renton and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to Tukwila, and calls for certain property currently located within Tukwila and described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth to be annexed to Renton, and WHEREAS, the Renton City Council has passed Resolution No. / , which calls for certain property currently located wit in enton and more particularly described on Exhibit A to be annexed to Tukwila and indicates Renton's willingness to accept annexation of certain property currently located within Tukwila and more particularly described on Exhibit B to Renton, and WHEREAS, both Resolutions recognize that there are issues of concern to both Renton and Tukwila that must be mutually resolved and Renton and Tukwila desire to enter into an interlocal agreement to resolve these issues, now, therefore FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Effect of Agreement. It is the intent of the parties to resolve issues of mutual concern with respect to pending reciprocal annexations. This Agreement shall become effective and shall bind the parties upon completion of the latter of the annexation of the property described on Exhibit B to Renton and annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to the City of Tukwila. In the event that, for any reason, one or both of the above referenced annexations are not completed, then this Agreement shall be null and void. 2. Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street Improvements. Local costs of the future crossing of the railroad tracks by Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street should be shared equitably between the two parties. In pursuit of this Agreement, both Cities agree to designate the aforementioned improvement of Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street as a high priority item on each City's Transportation Improvement Plan, and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. Because the timing of this street extension uncertain, Renton and Tukwila agree to monitor development and, as development warrants, to acknowledge that the route is needed and that both jurisdictions will cooperate to insure that an appropriate connection is designed and constructed. Because the crossing will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of the improvement shall be 50 %. 3. S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street Improvements. If a proposed grade separated crossing of S. W. 43rd and the railroad tracks s is undertaken to improve traffic safety and capacity, the CAG 046 -86 Interlocal Agreement Regarding Reciprocal Annexations Page 2 local costs should be shared equitably between Renton and Tukwila. The two Cities shall support the S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street improvement in the same manner as the Strander Boulevard /S. W. 27th Street railroad crossing. By support, it is meant that both Cities will designate this road improvement as a high priority item on each Cities' Transportation Improvement Plan and each provide one -half of the local funds needed to match an 80% federal funding for this road improvement project. If federal funding is unavailable, then Renton and Tukwila will negotiate an equitable funding option as necessary, such that each cities' share of the local costs of such road improvement shall be 50 %. Because the improvement will be located entirely within Tukwila upon completion of the annexation, the final decision as to the time for the improvement shall be left to the discretion of Tukwila. 4. P -1 Channel. The P -1 Channel is a storm drainage improvement to be located within that property described on Exhibit B which will be annexed to Renton. Renton agrees to assume what would have been Tukwila's share of the cost of construction and maintenance for that portion of the P -1 Channel which will be located in said area. The City of Tukwila shall retain the right to connect to and use the P -1 Channel. 5. Green River Dike Maintenance. Renton's share of the cost of the Green River Dike Maintenance Plan was 22% prior to the reciprocal annexations. Construction and maintenance costs for the Green River Dikes should be revised to reflect the fact that Renton will not have Green. River frontage after the reciprocal annexations are completed and that therefore Renton should have no obligation for dike maintenance or rehabilitation. 6. Frank Zepp Bridge. Upon completion of the 'reciprocal annexations, the Frank Zepp Bridge at S. W. 43rd Street /S. 180th Street will be located entirely within the City of Tukwila. Tukwila agrees to assume all costs of maintenance and = future widening for the bridge =;=... Both parties understand that with the annexation of the property described on Exhibit A to Tukwila, the responsibility for maintenance and operation of the traffic signals at the intersection of S. W. 43rd Street and West Valley Road (SR -181), formerly shared by the Cities of Renton and Kent, should be assumed in total by the City of Kent. 7. Utilities. Both parties understand that Renton has existing utilities serving a portion of the area to be annexed to the City of Tukwila bordered by S. W. 43rd Street, West Valley Highway, the existing Renton City limits and the Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way. Renton shall retain ownership of the said existing utilities and shall be responsible for all costs of operation and maintenance of the same. Tukwila shall be responsible for providing sewer and water service to all other areas annexed to Tukwila as part of the reciprocal annexations. Neither party shall impose a surcharge upon utility users within the newly annexed areas solely because of their annexation. 8. SR -181. The City of Renton should enter into an agreement with the State of Washington regarding the transfer of costs to the State for improvements to SR -181 between S. W. 43rd Street and I -405. The City of Tukwila shall bear no responsibility for such costs by virtue of the execution of this Agreement. 9. Future Annexations. Renton and Tukwila will coordinate review of future annexation petitions received by the parties consistent iwith the boundary line shown on Exhibit ttached hereto and incorporated herein by this refer 1 e or in full. Interlocal Agreement Regarding Annexations Page 3 10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties and no other agreements, oral or otherwise, shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto. DATED this /ie5 day of : 1986. CITY OF RENTON O t BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR Zg lirerttEIM MAX NE E. MOTO T CLE K APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTO 1 l APPROVED AS TO FORM: EY CI Y ATTORNEY aMwMctioto LAWRENCE J. WARREN. CITY ATTORNEY SECTION - TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE 3.62 NW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 27 (portion) 12.79 SW 1/4 of Sec. 24, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 63 2.35 32 0.27 28 3.85 7 MDC 4.55 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 38 1.84 0.91 8 MDC (p) 2.91 1.14 9 MDC (p) 3.05 43 2.15 50 0.84 51 0.72 23 2.16 6 6.70 2.16 24 (portion) 1170 21 MDC 2.45 2.16 22 (portion) T0.447 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 21 1.61 59 0.37 20 2.14 33 3.69 17 5.93 3.01 23 (portion) TETT 24 (portion) 5.44 1 22 3.01 NW 1/4 of Sec. 36, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 97 3.00 57 8.69 62 6.40 61 0.17 11 6.83 43 0.10 37 0.17 38 0.14 ' 39 0.14 53 0.14 14 0.12 . 13 • 0.12 29 0.32 10 0.14 9 0.19 59 0.15 8 0.17 1.7 0.12 35 2.84 34 1 5.54 f 1 36 1 3.09 TOTAL 1 45 parcels 1 101.65 EXHIBIT A Lands to be Annexed to Tukwila from Renton The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Tukwila from the City of Renton are listed below and shown in Figure 1. F i. !re 1 Renton -Tukwi t-- Aloundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton :eC Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton w • 2000. SECTION- TOWNSHIP -RANGE PARCEL ACREAGE SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 41 19.05 4 23.44 NW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 42 16.03 SW 1/4 of Sec. 25, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 19 40.21 SE 1/4 of Sec. 14, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 0160 (portion) 11.79 0145 .29 0155 (portion) 1.29 0150 1.49 0320 .28 0330 .02 Lot /2 .12 TOTAL 11 parcels 114.01 - EXHIBIT B Lands to be Annexed to Renton from Tukwila The lands proposed to be annexed to the City of Renton from the City of Tukwila are listed below and shown in Figure 1. Fic 1 Renton -Tukwl 'boundary Adjustment Map of Affected Areas Lands to Renton Lands to Tukwila Lands to Tukwila Lands to Renton loon' EXHIBIT C Areas Subject to Joint Tukwila- Renton Review of all Future Annexation Petitions APPLICANT: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION TRANSMITTAL LAND USE REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: APRIL 29, 1988 Attached hereto are: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 31, 1988, APRIL 14, 1988, SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT APRIL 14, 1988, PROPOSED ORDINANCES TO AMEND COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN MAP AND ZONING CODE TEXT AND MAP. The action taken by the Planning Commission is briefly described below: PLANNING DEPARTMENT MASTER FILE NO.: 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA LOCATION: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION STUDY AREA NORTH AND NORTHEAST OF THE CITY. (SEE ATTACHMENT A) AND CITY OF TUKWILA. REQUEST: AREA -WIDE AMENDMENTS TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING CODE AND MAP TO PROVIDE PRE - ANNEXATION ORDINANCES FOR SUBJECT ANNEXATION. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (SEE ATTACHMENT) CITY COUNCIL DEADLINE: MAY 16, 1988 SECOND PUBLIC HEARING REASONS FOR RECOMMEN1 ;TION: 1. PROVIDES COMPARABLE TUKWILA ZONING FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA. 2. FOR THE MAJORITY, IS SUPPORTED BY THE FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION TASK FORCE. (23 /LUR) 3. FOR THE MAJORITY, IS RESPONSIVE TO THE CONCERNS EXPRESSED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING HELD MARCH 31, 1988 AND APRIL 14, 1988. Respectfully submitted, AWIL / e � --4 Moira Carr Bradshaw Secretary ..,,........ w ............. w ......-.. ....s....�......,.Fw.,�.+,.�... axe..;... �. a.. w. o..< aut' nn., a. aatn,,..+ src�nnfo: tiisw Y�: t. atiN3, H'41* "hlsSxM.'�1�xn:::$t �.i:'k:13` ;°".t�.l. �. ���;• PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Recommend approval of amending the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as shown on Attachment I with a modification to show Light Industry for area east of 42nd Avenue S. north of 116th Avenue S. and west of Burlington Northern. Recommend approval of zoning as shown on Attachments J, K and L with a modification to show M -1, Light Industrial for area east of 42nd Avenue S., north of 116th Avenue E. and west of Burlington Northern Rail yard and an M -2L District as shown on Attachment N. Recommend approval of amendment to the Zoning Code to include: 1. Steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining consumalde electrode melting, open die hammer, or press forging as permitted uses in the M -2 zone. 2. Training as an accessory use in the M -2 Zone. 3. Truck terminals as permitted uses in the M -2 zone. 4. Include area as shown on Attachment M in Height Exception area: up to and including 115 feet. 5. Add a section regulating heights around major airports. 6. Allow manufactured homes to replace legal, grandfathered mobile and manufactured homes. 7. Amend Zoning Code to create an M -2L zone. 8. Include area shown on Attachment "0" in Height Exception Area: up to 65 feet outright and authorization above 65 feet up to and including 115 feet subject to Board of Architectural review and approval. to: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 (Corrected Minutes) -April 14, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Knudson, Haggerton, and Hamilton. Mr. Larson and Mr. Kirsop were absent. Representing the staff were Rick Beeler and Moira Bradshaw. MINUTES 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA: Public Hearing - Annexation area -wide amendments 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code (annexation area and City -wide amendments) Rick Beeler, Planning Director, explained the process that has been used in responding to the request for annexation. Moira Bradshaw, staff representative, entered into record Exhibits 1 (Staff Report) and '2 (letter from Spider Staging Corporation with respect to the sanitary sewer; which will not be considered in this public hearing). She explained the Fire District #1 annexation petition area and its four sub - areas. In sub -area 1, which is industrial,there are not many problems between the City and King County's designation. In sub -area 2 there are light manufacturing, retail, a non - conforming auto shop, apartments, and community center. The City would duplicate the zoning except for a transitional zone of Office /PO on Ryan Way and for an extension of the high density residential R -4 to include the two remaining lots on the low apartment block. The remainder is proposed for low density and R -1 -7.2 In sub -area 3 in the Empire Way neighborhood there are apartments and a mobile home park, commercial store type uses as well as light and heavy manufacturing uses. No changes are proposed, although Renton's comprehensive plan is for a green belt area for the southeast tip of the area. Ms. Bradshaw explained the comprehensive plan and zoning changes which would be in sub -area 4 to create comparable zoning. PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 Page 2 Ms. Bradshaw reviewed the zoning code amendments. Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, expressed concern with the height limitation. They would like to have a height limit that would give them the ability to redevelop at the current height limit. Dan Wolfe, Chairman of the Annexation Task Force, 11821 44th Avenue South, stated they would like another zone district of M -3 which would eliminate landscaping in a specified area. Woody Wilkinson, 2505 3rd Avenue, representing Jorgenson Steel, Boeing and Rhone Polene said they are interested in the passage of the annexation packet and have worked consistently with the Task Force to prepare these recommendations. Patrick Dillon, 3278 36th Avenue SW, expressed desire to have the City take a look at the property on the sharp bend of the river and resolve the zoning now so they would not have to wait to take action. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, entered Exhibit #3 (Highline Plan), Exhibit #4 (three zoning map boards), Exhibit #5 (Slides), Exhibit #6 (Drawings,, Exhibit #7 (Revised staff recommendations regarding manufactured homes), Exhibit #8 (photo maps of the Helstrom properties). Mr. Dillon explained the present use of the property and his wanting it to be light manufacturing. Chi -Tai Chu, 4431 NE 23rd Court, Renton, inquired of his area, which is R -1 low density. Robert Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 6th Avenue, Seattle, stated he is attorney for McConky Development Company, and they would like to support the Task Force recommendation that a new M -3 zone be created. RECESS Chairman Coplen declared a five- minute recess. The meeting was called back to order with Commissioners present as previously listed. Neil Roblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South, stated they have a family business of trucks and distribute truck parts and equipment. Scott Traverso, 11025 SE 60th, Renton, objected to a 15' landscape setback preventing room to develop. Jack Minnehan 11901 E. Marginal Way South, stated a 15' landscape setback would put t out of business. Ed Wdftodtth 52nd Avenue South, expressed the desire for M -1 zoning on lots fronting 44th Place across from Union Tank Works and backing up to Burlington Northern. Saul Shapiro, 12929 Empire Way South, stated that the Tukwila code does not address the special reeds of mobile homes in this area, therefore special considerati( may need to be made. Mobile Homes provide valuable housing for low income amilies. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and the Zoning Map at 9:15 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION March 31, 1988 Page 3 Chairman Coplen opened the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:25 p.m. John Richards, 15320 53rd Avenue South, representing Rainier Bank, stated page 13 of the Staff Report deals with heights. They would like to continue with the King County zoning as is suggested under discussion page 13. Chairman Coplen closed the Public Hearing on the Zoning Code Text Amendments at 9:33 p.m. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON THE HEIGHT UP TO AND INCLUDING 115' ON AREA DESIGNATED ON ATTACHMENT M. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Rick Beeler stated height exception could be considered at another meeting. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO INCLUDE THE AREA NORTH OF 116TH EAST OF 42ND AND WEST OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN IN AN M -1 ZONING DISTRICT AND A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION BASED ON THE GENERAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE AREA AND THE PROXIMITY OF THE RAILROAD AND THE TWENTY -FOUR HOUR BUSINESSES AND BASED ON THE FACT THIS CAN BE DONE WITHOUT NEGATIVELY IMPACTING THE RESIDENTIAL AREA. MOTION PASSED, WITH MR. HAMILTON VOTING NO. Chairman Coplen introduced discussion on the request for a new M -3 type of designation. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated that the concern is with redevelopment of the existing businesses. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE M -3 CLASSIFICATION BASED UPON THE INFORMATION PRESENTED DURING THIS MEETING AND IT BE ON THE AREA SHOWN BY STAFF. * Rick Beeler stated this issue could be brought back with a purpose statement. *MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN BY MR. KNUDSON WITH THE APPROVAL OF MR. HAGGERTON WHO SECONDED THE MOTION. MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAMILTON SECONDED A MOTION TO TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1988. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED AND MR. KNUDSON SECONDED A MOTION TO ADOPT THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE M P. AND ZONING CODE MAP AS PROPOSED AND AMENDED BY COMMISSION AND ZONING. CCIr AMENDMENTS EXCEPT FOR THE TWO BLOCKS NEXT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS: AND THE IM=3 ZONE, MOBILE HOMES, AND HEIGHT EXCEPTION FOR THE RAINIER BANK. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. RECESS (10:40 p.m.) MR. KNUDSON MOVED AND MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE MEETING UNTIL APRIL 14, 1988 AT 8:00 P.M. FOR CONSIDERATION OF THESE ITEMS. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Respectfully submitted, :;�•.�.. -�-' (�-� -sew -� Norma Booher, Secretary City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 14, 1988 The meeting was called to order at 8:06 p.m. by Mr. Coplen, Chairman. Members present were Messrs. Coplen, Kirsop, Knudson, Hamilton and Haggerton. Mr. Larson was absent. Representing the staff were Moira Bradshaw and Joanne Johnson. MINUTES • MR. KNUDSON MOVED TO ADOPT THE MINUTES OF THE MARCH 31, 1988 MEETING AS AMENDED. MR. HAGGERTON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 88 -1 -R and 88 -1 -CA: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION - Continued - Continued Public Hearing from the March 31, 1988 Planning Commission meeting regarding annexation area and City -wide amendments to the Zoning Map and Zoning Code. Moira Bradshaw reviewed the supplement to the March 17, 1988 staff report. The Public Hearing was reopened. Mr. Daniel P. Wolf, 11821 44th Avenue S. expressed his concerns regarding a proposed rezone in the annexation area from R -1 to M- 1. He submitted a list of persons living in the affected area which were surveyed for their preference. This was entered into the record as Exhibit 9. Mr. Mike Levy, 17310 S.E. 45th Street, Issaquah represented the owner of a mobile home park in the annexation area. He expressed his concern at the adverse impacts to low income residents should a change be recommended from what is now presently permitted in the area. Ms. Bradshaw clarified that the park would be unaffected by the proposed changes. Planning Commission April 14, 1988 Page 2 Bob Mackin, 1301 Aetna Plaza, 2201 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98121 represented Scott Traverso and Six Robblees Inc. His concern was the adverse impacts the landscaping requirement of the M -2 zone would have on businesses presently operating in the area. Neil Robblee, 11010 Pacific Highway South felt the landscaping requirement would result in poor visibility and, thus, create a safety hazard for trucks leaving his business. He requested flexibility to move landscaping back from the street. Scott Traverso, 11025 S.E. 60th, Renton, concurred with Mr. Rob - blee and also felt that landscaping placed around the building would be more appropriate. Pete Hedegard, 16800 N.E. 31st, Bellevue favored landscaping against the buildings or kept at lower levels and in narrower areas. He felt trees would create a visual hazard for truck traffic and therefore should not be part of the landscaping. Bill Schaible, 5729 S. Pamela Drive, Seattle, WA. He has a 1973 mobile home on his property and wanted it grandfathered in. He has three lots but they are difficult to develop because of their shape and easements. Inability to use a mobile home would render the property useless. Discussion ensued on this issue. Ed Woyvodich, 14415 - 57th Avenue S., pointed out that the fill that took place on his property was in accordance with all King County standards. He submitted a diagram of his property as Exhibit 10. He felt that unless the property is designated commercial, his property will be rendered useless. John Richards, 15320 - 64th Avenue S. represented Rainier Bank. He favored a 65 foot building height limitation or, subsequent to Board of Architectural review, the option of going higher. Sharon Stanley, 12072 - 44th Place S. was concerned with the impacts a- rezone from R -1 to M -1 would have on her property. She. wanted•tllt neighborhood and quality of life to be maintained as it is. Norma Derr, 12507 - 50th Place S. expressed a concern regarding the inability to use mobile homes would have on development of the rather small lots in their area. Glenda Knudson, 12050 - 44th Place S. requested information as to the impacts the annexation and rezone will have on her property. PLANNING COMMISSION April 14, 1988 Page 3 Louis Stanley, 12072 - 44th Place S. asked if the current zoning would remain the same if annexation were to occur. Mr. Hamilton clarified that the intent is to preserve the current zoning. Dan Wolf asked for clarification on the current status of the proposed rezone from R -1 to M -1. Mr. Knudson clarified that a vote was not taken at the last meeting. The Public Hearing was closed and a 4- minute recess was called. MR. HAMILTON MOVED TO APPROVE ALTERNATIVE 1 OF THE STAFF REPORT WITH A PROPOSED NEW SECTION M -2L WHOSE PURPOSE SHALL READ AS STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE ADDITION OF "AND FLEXIBLE FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING, TO AMEND TABLE 2 OF THE STAFF REPORT TO SHOW THE M -2L ZONE WITH FIVE FEET OF FRONT YARD LANDSCAPING. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAMILTON MOVED THAT ISSUE NO. 2 MOBILE HOME /MANUFACTURED HOMES THAT WE ACCEPT THE TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION. MR. KNUDSON SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. HAGGERTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE HEIGHT OF THE ENTIRE DISTRICT AS SHOWN ON THE MAP (BOARD 3) TO 65 FEET WHICH IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR EXITING CODE AND HIGHER SUBJECT TO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPROVAL ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH WAS UNANIMOUSLY PASSED. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO LEAVE THE DESIGNATION ON THE TWO BLOCKS DESIGNATED LIGHT INDUSTRY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS R -1, 7.2. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION. A VOTE WAS TAKEN WITH KIRSOP AND HAMILTON VOTING YES; MR. KNUDSON VOTING NO AND MR. HAGGERTON OBTAINING. Mr. Coplen noted that a note of thanks was received from Mrs. Sowinski.. ADJOURNMEK The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 pm. Respectfully'submitted, Joanne Johnson Secretary EXISTING DISCUSSION City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT IN HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE Supplement to March 17 Staff Report The 15 -foot front yard landscape requirement in the M -2 zone is 7 feet more than the 8 -foot front yard landscape requirement of the existing M -H King County zone. The Tukwila requirement of additional landscaping only appears to be adverse in an area shown on Attachment N. The area is developed with a large number of truck /trailer -type businesses and parcels which are constricted by size, adjacent roads, the river, and /or utility easements. The 15 feet of landscaping appears to be reasonable and desirable in the exist- ing M -2 district in the City and the remaining M -2 districts in the annexation area. Therefore some alternative not available in the current City code is necessary to provide comparable zoning for the subject area. The testimony received characterized the area as unique from typically large heavy manufacturing sites which accommodate a manufacturing process. The area currently is a mix of commercial, hotel, office, wholesale, truck terminal, storage and residential uses. The predominant use is truck - related sales or businesses which receive daily truck traffic. A landscape buffer, however narrow, can be effective in defining the roadway and providing visual improvement and relief from concrete and asphalt. A landscape area helps separate maneuvering and parked traffic from the road. A grass strip with trees strategically placed between curb cuts does not inhibit views or public safety, or the City could not require landscaping in any commercial area. A 4 -foot area requires expertise in tree selection, whereas 5 feet gives much wider discretion in choice of plant material. Much of the discussion has focused on the needs of truck traffic. These needs and problems are felt in the existing business community of Tukwila. A landscaping exemption for all businesses in the City and annexation area with frequent truck traffic would eliminate landscaping in a majority of areas in the City's commercial /industrial zones. Therefore one solution is to create a new zoning district which recognizes the uniqueness of the annexation area. However, other solutions are also available. These solutions are discussed below. ALTERNATIVES M -2L .... w..... w„ r.+ w.. rN. titit 5M WAV7.135 F I.viL'FGtY P? LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT IN HEAVY INDUSTRY ZONE Page 2 1. Add a new Section 18.43 - M -2L whose purpose would be as follows: The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique in- dustrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibra- tion, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards in recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. Amend Table 2 - Required Landscape Areas ZONE FRONT SIDE REAR 5 feet None None • To include grass and street trees every 30 feet 2. Change the landscape requirement in the existing M -2 zone to permit 5 feet of landscaping for truck terminals and heavy trucking - related businesses and services. 3. Change the landscape requirement in the existing M -2 zone to 5 feet rather than existing 15 feet. ..,nZ...' e...:'_Y "J7,}'. •'.Vr,CS }t�i . Y..�YLi':Tls:!i:+:'i�.nt ..1. '�3'JSYf.ti:ccinnnx.n -+.� EXISTING As shown on Attachment D, the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Map, light indus- try uses are positioned adjacent to low density residential uses. Now a heavy industrial use - the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Railroad railways and yards - is adjacent to single - family development. The Planning Commission recommended a Comprehensive Land Use Map and Zoning District change to Heavy Industry for the railroad property and Union Tank Works, as shown on Attachments I and L. This action leaves one block between the railroad and Union Tank Works and another block just south of the Hub Center's entrance, with a Light Industry Comprehensive Plan designation and R -1 zoning. The implication is that Light Industry is perceived as appropriate but change in use is not ready to occur until circumstances change (e.g., adequate utilities are available, streets are improved, etc.). The implications of a more intense zone for the subject blocks is discussed on page 7, Item 5.b of the March 17 Staff Report. There are 22 single - family homes in the subject blocks and one nonconforming Light Industrial use. The Kroll Map indicates that two homes were recently built and none Piave been demolished. The condition of the homes range from poor to excellent with no obvious pattern. Whereas the railroad tracks and freight yard may be unappealing for the subject property owners, the view impact is confined and can be screened with vegetation. Noise impact is not mitigated. The traffic from the Burlington Northern HUB Center is also confined to the one entrance and exit onto 124th Street. A change of zoning would eventually lead to development that will introduce traffic onto the residential streets. That traffic will have a greater adverse impact than the now - needed transition. In addition, the land use intent of the annexation is to provide parity. The sub- ject change would impact the 22 homeowners within the subject area as well as the innumerable homeowners across the street and throughout the neighborhood. ALTERNATIVES •.wn.n.w •.. ....+. e......,... ...•......�....r.w.w�.r.x_vrc^r ruri'.'rttM�a�A.Y,Ylfne:. Ynvsr, tivo t,tcracnr_.Yfr•N .`:, TRANSITION BETWEEN HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND SINGLE- FAMILY DISTRICTS IN ALLENTOWN /DUWAMISH NEIGHBORHOOD 1. Provide R -1 -7.2 zoning, thereby retaining the status quo. 2. Change the zoning to M -1 (Light Industry), which has a 25 -foot front yard (4 feet less than the 30 feet required for R -1), no side and 5 -foot rear. 3. Change the zoning to C -M (Industrial Park), which has a 50 -foot front yard setback and 5 - foot side and rear. (22 /88- 1- CPA.S) • FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System LcgC �1 S Study Area Boundary Proposed "M - 2L" District NORTH CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT N FIGURE 1 J CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND IQJOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area, at some future time, will be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, parts of said area are within the City's planning area and therefore subject to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, existing ordinance nos. 1118 and 1138 provide for land use planning and zoning regulation for two parts of said area, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988, and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and that the existing plan map be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138 of the City of Tukwila are hereby repealed. Section 2. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map is hereby amended to reflect that the property known as Fire District #1 Study Area and shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby added to such plan map, and the policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and amended in Ordinance No. 1246 and as hereafter amended, shall apply to said area. 474484 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Page 1 ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED: 474484 CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: Page 2 Section 3. At such time as said described area or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan for the subject area is shown on the map which is attached as "Exhibit B ". Section 5. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of the City Clerk B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 7. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this day of , 1988. MAYOR, GARY VAN DUSEN 4 G 11 11! 111!11110111 „1:11 T O N 111 ; FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Legend 8 Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A NORTH CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT A FIGURE 1 N4 . f y ,••••••••••' •, ••••••• , • '•••::• ,•-•-• • • i • i•� • •• ••• * W ••••• • r •.,• •••r• •••••' • •••••••••••••••*•:�.� •••••••••• •••�••• ��': .. 1 ,.. .. 4 . • : ❖4 ❖:•• ❖••:• • 4••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••• •••••••••• ,•••••• KING COUNTY • form nosh. Rk ® LLr 111 I�I FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations Lung E COM Low Density Residential High Density Residential Professional /Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Parks and Open Space Public Facility EXHIBIT B CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT I FIGURE 9 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may at some time in the future be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988 and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and amending the Zoning Code and Zoning Map and that the existing plan, zoning code and plan, and zoning maps, be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4, 1988 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new use zone to accommodate existing, unique, heavy industrial trucking areas that require less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new category of height restriction exception areas allowing for heights up to 65 feet as a matter of right, and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1988, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. , amending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and plan map to provide for a plan for the area in the event of annexation, Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Fire District #1 Study Area and is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code 3296C5 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Page 1 3296CS (7) Truck terminals. Page 2 of the City of Tukwila and to the zoning map which consists of Exhibits B, C, and D hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows: A. Section 18.42.020(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dieing, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws. B. Section 18.42.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: C. Section 18.42.030 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily to the principally permitted uses; such as service,... repair and training activities. _ r. D. • Section 18.42.040(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; E. Section''18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.025 Building height up to sixty -five feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 65 feet in areas as shown on Map 2. Authorization for buildinng heights above 65 feet up to and including 115 feet shall be made by Board of Architectural Review pursuant to the guidelines and procedures specified in Chapter 18.60. F. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as shown on Map 2. G. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.025 and Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 to include areas as shown on Exhibit E. H. Section 18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.045 Height regulations around major airports. For the purposes of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all 3296C5 the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provision of this section, the city adopts the following airport height map: A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, 1986, and as the same may be amended. I. Section 18.70 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre- existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD- approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or ~'fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof. (2) Shall have a Oinimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, oo about :25 percent. (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and windload factor of eighty (80) miles per hour. (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. J. Section 18.06.220 of the Tukwila Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or a modular home is not considered a mobile home. K. Section 18.06.240 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Page 3 18.06.240 Dwelling, single - family. "Single- family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 § 1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is considered to be a single- family dwelling. L. Section 18.06 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the buildinq::nsite, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance , , with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards.' M. Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: Sections: 3296C5 CHAPTER 18.43 M -2L DISTRICT - -HEAVY INDUSTRY/ 18.43.010 Purpose. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. 18.41.060 Parking regulations. -�.� ... (1) Any principally permitted uses in the M -1 district; (2) Any principally permitted uses in the M -2 district; (3) Truck terminals. Page 4 18.43.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique industrial `erea which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibration,'glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires lese_... design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping -In recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. In the M -2L district, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than the following uses, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.42.030 and 18.42.040: 18.43.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit from the city as provided in Chapter 18.64: (1) Conditional uses as provided in the M -1 district; (2) Conditional uses as provided in the M -2 district; (3) General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 of this title. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. In the M -2L district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and maximum height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. N. Table 2, Required Landscape Areas, of Chapter 18.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Zone Landscape Landscape Landscape District (in feet) (in feet) (in feet) M -2L 5 none none PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CITY CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: EFFECTIVE DATE: ORDINANCE NO.: 3296C5 MAYOR, GARY VAN DUSEN i FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System irrilfdd some= Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A i N NORTH CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT A FIGURE 1 .} FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 1 Light Industry Heavy Industry LXHIBIT B CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. 4• ATTACHMENT J FIGURE — • • Xv. e. • . • . • ........ . .. ............. . . . .... • • I H KING COUNTY • . .... ... . FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 HIHIHIU Single-family Residence Low Apartments Multiple Residence/High Density Regional Retail Business Light Industry Heavy Industry EXHIBIT C NORTH CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT K FIGURE FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 2 & 4 inand 1 7771 Low Apartments Multiple Residence/High Density Wee474 MEW! 11111111111 ■ Single-family Residence Professional and Office Community Retail Business Regional Retail Business Light Industry Heavy Industry EXHIBIT D NORTH CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH II ASSOC.,INC. STALZER I ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT L FIGURE ' A • • a-r-,4,6•L*50:A$ At* 41 Amazt 1 1..11 > .4 CP 0 "4 10 f t A 41 . 5; • 1 • rn z -o 0 TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMM'w TEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTEr May 9, 1988 Page 2 SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS ON KEY AGENDA ITEMS - Contd. Presentation by K. C. staff to explain prop. K.C. Parks Bond Issue - contd. Don Williams, Directors of Parks and Recreation, stated METRO has an agreement with King County to provide funds and easements for trails along the pipeline. That portion will be completed with METRO funds. Council President Harris stated since more people use the trails during the daytime than at night, the daytime population of Tukwila should be considered rather than the 4,800 residents of the City. The daytime population is approximately 50,000 people. We will send in a list of the projects we would like for the City. Interview w /Public MOVED BY DUFFIE, SECONDED BY ROBERTSON, THAT COUNCIL GO INTO EXECUTIVE Works Director SESSION TO CONDUCT AN INTERVIEW WITH PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR APPLICATION. Applicant. RECESS 8:35 - 8:47 P.M. OLD BUSINESS Regional Concern on Fire Dist. #1 Annexation. Councilmembers expressed the desire to interview candidate Joe Aldegarie in the open meeting and not in Executive Session. *MOTION FAILED. Mayor Van Dusen stated that as a result of the professional research conducted by Tom Waldron a job offer has been made to candidate Joe Aldegarie, Missoula, Montana. The City has requested that Mr. Aldegarie reside within the Tukwila city limites. The waiver of this obligation would be only by approval of the Mayor. Each Councilmember discussed with Mr. Aldegarie his style of supervision; his thoughts, reactions and experience with unions; his attitude toward hiring minorities and women; working and preparing budgets; annexation; and his reasons for leaving his present employment with the City of Missoula. Mr. Aldegarie said he liked to organize and get things done. He stated he has always been able to communicate with those he worked with and supervised. Mayor Van Dusen stated Joe Aldegarie's name would be presented to the Council next Monday night for confirmation as Public Works Director to begin his employment on June 15, 1988. Council President Harris called for a five - minutes recess. The Committee of the Whole Meeting was called back to order by Council President Harris with Councilmembers present as previously listed. Rick Beeler, Planning Director, stated the 16th Street bridge will be an issue when the BRB hearing on the annexation is held on June 16, 1988. Council President Harris stated the matter was discussed with Renton City Council during their joint meeting and there may be another meeting. Mr. Beeler stated the following six points are under consideration: (1) The City jointly fund Oaksdale Avenue improvement and this be high on the C.I.P. (2) It is logical for Renton to provide police protec- tion. (3) Tukwila to provide short -term fire protection. (4) Renton might annex. (5) If the BRB deletes Fire District #1, Renton will initiate annexation of the area. (6) Tukwila will zone C -M or some- thing like that. Ross Earnst, City Engineer, said we have a 50/50 agreement with Renton on the extension of Strander Boulevard into Renton. Councilmember Moriwaki said we do not want anything to jeopardize the annexation. The people in the area have come to trust the Council and we do not want to lose their respect. He thought the entire area should be annexed. Mr. Beller asked the Council if they would like to get the interlocal agreement with Renton before the vote? Councilmember Robertson said he would like to see complete plan for Oaksdale and the time plan and cost. The 10% could be overwhelming. TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING MINUTES May 9, 1988 Page 3 OLD BUSINESS - Contd. Regional Concern on Council President Harris stated the City should not commit any funds, F. D. #1 Annexation it may be years and years down the road -- it should go on the T.I.P. - contd. if we get the annexation. The strength of Renton is needed -- we want to keep the incincerator out of our area. There is no problem with agreeing to participate with Renton on Oaksdale; they will be willing to trade. NEW BUSINESS Sewer Connection to property out- side City limits owned by Wm. A. Looney. C.I.P. Plan Policies EXECUTIVE SESSION 10:45 - 11:00 P.M. Councilmember Hernandez said there should be a seventh point with reference to those listed by Mr. Beeler. It should be that Renton agrees to work with Tukwila to not have the Black River Quarry as a dump site. Council President Harris said she would communicate with Renton City Council and report back to the Council. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner, outlined the area of the 16th Avenue drawbridge if it is in the annexed area. It would be very expensive to maintain. She outlined Alternates I, IA, and II. Woody Wilkinson, consultant for Jorgensen Steel, stated when Seattle tried to annex this area they were turned down by the BRB. They said the bridge would have to go with the annexation. Discussion ensued on the methodology of paying maintenance on the bridge. Prop. Ord. to meet Council President Harris said this proposed ordinance would be on the new regulations consent agenda of the next Regular Meeting of the Council. for flood plain management & model flood damage pre- vention policies as required of juris- dictions participa- ting in Natl. Flood Ins. Program. Ross Earnst, City Engineer, said Mr. Looney has requested sewer service to his property outside the City limits. The Utilities Committee has recommended that two single family lots be connected for sewer service. Mr. Looney had requested four connections. The houses do not meet the set -back requirements of the City., Mr. Looney is agreeable to annexing to the City. Council President Harris stated the matter would be on the agenda of the next Regular Meeting of the Council. Prop. Ord. adopting Councilmember Moriwaki stated he has some revisions for the proposed custodial care stds.ordinance. He referred to page 3 and requested that Item D and Item E for adult holding become Items B and C and the present Items B and C become Items D and facility operated E. On page 6, Item (2) (b), the last line should read: "..the same by Tukwila Police sex as the prisoner $00010 shall be present." Page 8, A, (2) (b), Dept. second line should be "eighteW rather than "sixteen." One page 8, B (1), second line, "four" should be replaced with "six." Page 10, H, second line, "may have" should replace "has." Page 10, H, third line, after words "on duty" should have added "and a personnel from the Fire Department." City Attorney John Cosgrove stated he would redraft the ordinance with the abovementioned changes. Council President Harris stated the proposed ordinance would be on the agenda of the next Regular Meeting of the Council. Councilmember Robertson stated the committee will distribute a revised C.I.P. Plan policy for consideration by the Council. Council President Harris called for members of the Council to go into Executive Session to discuss a possible purchase of property and negotiations /condemnation. . .�. - TO: FROM: DATE: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 1206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Community Affairs and Parks Moira Carr Bradshaw May 5, 1988 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: BRB FILE NO. 1450 - FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA - BOUNDARY IRREGULARITIES The attached documents are information regarding the perimeter boundary of the proposed annexation. The legal description for the King County Fire District was created prior to much of the platting and development of the area. Planning staff has attempted to contact all the property owners. In instances where we have not received a reply, we use our best judgment to make the most logical choice given the circumstances. The following vicinity map locates the five areas of concern. Kroll maps highlight each of the areas, and indicate existing and proposed boundaries. MCB /sjn attachments . i. a:: r;r �:�<ii�' ?'i,,,, fir}. ^;.,. "+'r- ..r.,.,:• <x::9 MEMORANDUM May 4, 1988 TO: JOHN COLGROVE FROM: HUGH DAVIS RE: TUKWILA SUBJECT: FIRE PROTECTION IN NON- ANNEXED TERRITORY iyy.:..� `3',r+y ?: "L w ?.'�i ?fi :1�?�f�' .., • :v ° a'�:C:�_.:.hv'.. .,. ,.. . By the end of the year, Tukwila may annex a portion of King County Fire District No. 1. Under a contract between Tukwila and the fire district, Tukwila currently supplies fire protection services to the entire district. The portion of the fire district that Tukwila ultimately annexes is likely to include real property of more than 60% of the value of all real property in the entire district. Under RCW 35A.14.380, the residents of the non - annexed territory could require Tukwila to supply fire protection services to this territory after the annexation, even if Tukwila were not already under contract to provide such services. Tukwila anticipates that the annexed territory will include the residence of every current commissioner of the fire district. Under RCW 52.14.010, one of the qualifications for the office of fire commissioner is residence in the fire district. As of the effective date of the annexation, therefore, the fire district may have no commissioners left. The questions are: 1) Who is in charge of the fire district between the effective date of the annexation and the next election of fire commissioners? and 2) Should Tukwila continue to provide 00:01 /rs AV,%444.s:1E, .1■4 awZ.V. v r.:sr.,..ntsys.uasw...•v.f.:ar .XttVi:s.nuc;MIVIC LV..IV i- ArrVat . nrrarsv,. +'e�?rHtti 35 aM. V V": '- r•- fire protection services until there is a new agreement with officials of the non - annexed territory? If there are no commissioners left after the annexation, then under RCW 52.14.050 the county legislative authority should appoint fire commissioners to serve until the next general election. The county legislative authority should do so within 30 days of the creation of the vacancies on the Board of Commissioners. As a result, the absence of fire commissioners should continue no more than 30 days after the effective date of the annexation. Until the county legislative authority appoints interim fire commissioners, Tukwila probably should continue to honor the current contract for provision of fire protection services. I have not seen the contract. There is no reason to assume that the annexation would result in a termination of the contract, unless the contract specifically so provides. Certainly, Tukwila has no grounds on which to complain about the contract, since after the annexation Tukwila would simply have less territory to serve under the contract. It is the fire district that presumably would wish to alter the contract, particularly by downward adjustment of the fee. 35A:14.340 Annexation of water, sewer, and fi 35A.14.350 to 35A. .370. ch. ' , § 10 010 et seq. See, now, § 35.1 Section 35A. .350 was, derived from • Laws 1967, E . ., ch. 119, and related to annexat • n of water, sewer and fire districts. on 35A.14.360 was derived from La - 1967, Ex.Sess., ch. 119 and related assumption of control of. water or. sewer districts where sixty percent or more of area or valuation was annexed or laid within code city. • OPTIONAL MUNICIPAL PLAN 35A:14.340.' Notice and heating - Filings and recordings ' ' legislative body the code city shall hold two or more public hearings, to be . held at least' thirty days apart, 'upon the proposed zon g regulation, giving notice of the time and place thereof by publi tion in a newspaper of general circulation in the annexing city an resolution or any part true copy by. t county auditor. or. adopted by the with the county audit resolution and keep on the area to be annexed. • A copy of the ord dopting or embodying such proposed zoni ereof or any amendment thereto, d clerk of the annexing city sha like certified copy of any dinance or resolutio The auditor s ile the map ance or regulation certified as a c filed with the p or plat referred to shall likewise be filed record the ordinance or plat. • erences istricts, see ch. 35.13A. epealed by Laws 1971, Ex.Sess., the c lion by tention o ' vacation cre 1969, Ex.Sess., ion 35A.14.365, providing, within text of municipal code, annexa- ode cities, employees with re- rvice credits, sick leave and t, was derived from Laws h. 51, § 5. Section 35A.1 • . 70 provided for ns- • sumption of contr part of water or sewer district if less th. I sixty percent of area or valuation were a Ivied. and was derived from Laws 1967, Ex.Sess., cli. 119. •, 35A.14.380 • Ownership of assets of fire protection district— Assumption of responsibility of fire protection -When at least sixty percent of assessed valua- tion Is annexed or Incorporated Is code city If a portion of a fire protection district including at least sixty percent of the assessed valuation of the real property of the district is annexed to or incorporated into a code city, ownership of all of the assets of the district shall be vested in the code city, upon payment in cash, properties or contracts for fire protection services to the district within one year, of a percentage of the value of said assets equal to the percentage of the value of the real property in the entire district remaining outside the incorporated or annexed area. 94 ANNEXATION BY CODE not affected I Severability -1986 a 278: See note following RCW 36.01.010. (1987 Ed.) Chapter 52.14 COMMISSIONERS Sections 52.14.010 Number— Qualifications — Insurance — Compen- sation —Service as volunteer fireman— Waiver of compensation —Terms of first commissioners. 52.14.015 Increase from three to five commissioners — Election. 52.14.020 Number in district having full —time, fully —paid person- nel —Terms of first appointees. 52.14.025 Terms— Elections. 52.14.030 Election precincts. 52.14.040 Statement of candidacy. 52.14.050 Vacancies — Procedure for filling— Grounds for de- claring office vacant. 52.14.060 Terms of first elected commissioners. 52.14.070 Oath of office. 52.14.080 Chairman — Secretary— Duties and oath. 52.14.090 Office— Meetings. 52.14.100 Meetings— Powers and duties of board. 52.14.110 Purchases and public works— Competitive bids re- quired— Exceptions. 52.14.120 Purchases and public works — Competitive bidding procedures. 52.14.010 Number — Qualifications Insur= ance -- Compensation— Service as volunteer fire- man Waiver of compensation —Terms of first commissioners. The affairs of the district shall be man- aged by a board of fire commissioners composed of three resident electors - of the district except as provided in RCW 52.14.0I5 and 52.14.020. Each member shall each receive fifty dollars per day or portion thereof, not to exceed four thousand eight hundred dollars per year, for attendance at board meetings and for performance of other services in behalf of the district. In addition, they shall receive necessary expenses in- curred in attending meetings of the board or when otherwise engaged in district business, and shall be enti- tled to receive the same insurance available to all fire- men of the district: Provided, That the premiums for such insurance, except liability insurance, shall be paid by the individual commissioners who elect to receive it. Any commissioner may waive all or any portion of his or her compensation payable under this section as to any month or months during his or her term of office, by a written waiver filed with the secretary as provided in this section. The waiver, to be effective, must be filed any time after the commissioner's election and prior to the date on which said compensation would otherwise be paid. The waiver shall specify the month or period of months for which it is made. The board shall fix the compensation to be paid the secretary and all other agents and employees of the dis- trict. The board may, by resolution adopted by unani- mous vote, authorize any of its members to serve as volunteer firemen without compensation. A commis- sioner actually serving as a volunteer fireman may enjoy the rights and benefits of a volunteer fireman. The first commissioners shall take office immediately when quali- fied in accordance with RCW 29.01.135 and shall serve until after the next general election for the selection of Commissioners commissioners and until their successors have been elected and have qualified and have assumed office in accordance with RCW 29.04.170. [ 1985 c 330 § 2; 1980 c 27 § 1; 1979 ex.s. c 126 § 31; 1973 c 86 § 1; 1971 ex.s. c 242 § 2; 1969 ex.s. c 67 § 1; 1967 c 51 § 1; 1965 c 112 § 1; 1959 c 237 § 4; 1957 c 238 § 1; 1945 c 162 § 3; 1939 c 34 § 22; Rem. Supp. 1945 § 5654 -122. Formerly RCW 52.12.010.] Purpose -1979 ex.s. c 126: See RCW 29.04.170(1). Candidates for first commissioners: RCW 52.02.070. Terms of first elected commissioners: RCW 52.14.060. 52.14.015 Increase from three to five commission- ers— Election. In the event a three member board of commissioners of any fire protection district determines by resolution and approves by unanimous vote of the board that it would be in the best interest of the district to increase the number of commissioners from three to five, or in the event the board is presented with a peti- tion signed by fifteen percent of the qualified electors resident within the district calling for such an increase in the number of commissioners of the district, the board shall submit a resolution to the legislative body of the county requesting that an election be held. Upon receipt of the resolution, the legislative authority of the county shall call a special election to be held within the fire protection district at which election the following propo- sition shall be submitted to the voters: Shall the board of commissioners of county fire protection district no. be increased from three members to five members? Yes No 52.14.025 if the proposition receives a majority approval at the election, the board of commissioners of the fire protec- tion district shall be increased to five members. The two additional members shall be appointed in the same manner as provided in RCW 52.14.020. [1984 c 230 § 85.] 52.14.020 Number in district having full –time, fully – paid personnel—Terms of first appointees. In a fire protection district maintaining a fire department con- sisting wholly of personnel employed on a full –time, fully –paid basis, there shall be five fire commissioners. The two positions created on boards of fire commission- ers by this section shall be filled initially as for a va- cancy, except that the appointees shall draw lots, one appointee to serve until the next general fire district election after the appointment, at which two commis- sioners shall be elected for six –year terms, and the other appointee to serve until the second general fire district election after the appointment, at which two commis- sioners shall be elected for six –year terms. [ 1984 c 230 § 29; 1971 ex.s. c 242 § 3. Formerly RCW 52.12.015.] 52.14.025 Terms — Elections. Except as otherwise provided, the term of fire commissioner is six years and shall begin in accordance with RCW 29.04.170. Fire (Title 52 RCW—p 131 • 52.14.025 protection district elections shall be held in odd –num- bered years and shall be conducted by the election offi- cials of the county in accordance with the general election laws of the state. [ 1984 c 230 § 30; 1979 ex.s. c 126 § 32; 1939 c 34 § 23; RRS § 5654 -123. Formerly RCW 52.12.020.) Purpose--1979 ex.s. a 126: See RCW 29.04.170(1). Elections: Title 29 RCW. 52.14.030 Election precincts. The polling places for district elections shall be those of the county voting pre- cincts which include any of the territory within the fire protection districts. District elections may be located outside the boundaries of the district and shall not be held to be irregular or void on that account. [ 1984 c 230 § 31; 1939 c 34 § 24; RRS § 5654 -124. Formerly RCW 52.12.030.) 52.14.040 Statement of candidacy. Not more than sixty nor Tess than forty –six days prior to the date of election, any resident elector of the district desiring to become a candidate for office of fire commissioner shall file with the county auditor of the county a statement of candidacy for which a fee shall not be charged. The res- ident electors so filing are entitled to have their names appear as candidates on the ballot for the election. [ 1984 c 230 § 32; 1972 ex.s. c 101 § 1; 1947 c 254 § 7; 1939 c 34 § 25; Rem. Supp. 1947 § 5654 -125. Formerly RCW 52.12.040.) 52.14.050 Vacancies Procedure for felling Grounds for declaring office vacant. In the event of a vacancy occurring in the office of fire commissioner, the vtcancy shall, within sixty days, be filled, by appoint- ment.of a resident elector of the district by a vote of the . remaining fire commissioners. The person appointed shall serve until a successor has been elected or ap- pointed and has qualified. If the board of commissioners fails to fill the vacancy within the sixty –day period, the county legislative authority shall make the appointment. I '; =the number of vacancies is such that there are net . a stajority of the full number of commissioners in officx as fixed by law, the county legislative authority .sball,,within thirty days of the vacancies appoint the required; number to crate a majority as prescribed by, law to: fill the va- cancies ad interim through the next general election. At the next general election, if there is sufficient time for the nomination of candidates for office of fire commis- sioner, after the filling of any vacancy in the office, a fire commissioner shall be elected to serve for the re- mainder of the unexpired term. If a fire commissioner is absent from the district for three consecutive regularly scheduled meetings unless by permission of the board, the office shall be declared va- cant by the board of commissioners and the vacancy shall be filled as provided for in this section. However, such an action shall not be taken unless the commis- sioner is notified by mail after two consecutive unex- cused absences that the position will be declared vacant if the commissioner is absent without being excused from the next regularly scheduled meeting. [ 1984 c 238 (Title 52 RCW--p 141 Title 52 RCW: Fire Protection Districts § 2; 1977 c 64 § 1; 1974 ex.s. c 17 § 1; 1971 ex.s. c 153 § 1; 1939 c 34 § 26; RRS § 5654 -126. Formerly RCW 52.12.050.1 52.14.060 Terms of first elected commissioners. At the time of the first general election occurring thirty or more days after the creation of a district, three members of the board of fire commissioners shall be elected. The candidate receiving the highest number of votes shall serve for a term of six years beginning in accordance with RCW 29.04.170, the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes shall serve for a term of four years, and the candidate receiving the next highest number of votes shall serve for a term of two years. It is the intent of the law that the term of a fire commis- sioner shall expire biennially and that this relationship be preserved as far as legally possible. [ 1984 c 230 § 33; 1979 ex.s. c 126 § 33; 1939 c 34 § 27; RRS § 5654 -127. Formerly RCW 52.12.060.) Purpose -1979 exs. c 126: See RCW 29.04.170(1). Candidates for first commissioners: RCW 52.02.070. Terms of first commissioners: RCW 52.14.010. 52.14.070 Oath of office. Before beginning the du- ties of office. each fire commissioner shall take and sub- scribe the official oath for the faithful discharge of the duties of office as required by RCW 29.01.135, which oath shall be filed in the office of the auditor of the county in which the district is situated. [ 1986 c 167 § 22; 1984 c 230 § 34; 1939 c 34 § 29; RRS § 5654 -129. Formerly RCA 52.12.070.) Sererabilir -1986 c 167: See note following RCW 29.01.055. 52.14.080 Chairman Secretary Duties and oath. The fire commissioners shall elect a chairman from their number and shall appoint a secretary of the dis- trict, who may or may not be a member of the board, for such term as they shall by resolution determine. The secretary, if a member of the board, shall not receive additional compensation for serving as secretary. The secretary of the district shall keep a record of the proceedings of the board, shall perform other duties as prescribed by the board or by law, and shall take and subscribe an official oath similar to that of the fire com- missioners which oath shall be filed in the same office as that of the commissioners. [ 1984 c 230 § 35; 1965 c 112 § 2; 1939 c 34 § 30; RRS § 5654 -130. Formerly RCW 52.12.080.) 52.14.090 Office— Meetings. (1) The office of the fire commissioners and principal place of business of the district shall be at some place within the county in which the district is situated, to be designated by the board of fire commissioners. (2) The board shall hold regular monthly meetings at a place and date as it determines by resolution, and may adjourn its meetings as required for the proper transac- tion of business. Special meetings of the board shall be called at any time under the provisions of RCW 42.30- .080. [ 1984 c 230 § 36; 1947 c 254 § 8; 1939 c 34 § 31; (1987 Ed.) Rem. Supp. 1947 § 5654 -131. Formerly RCW 52.12.090.] 52.14.100 Meetings — Powers and duties of board. All meetings of the board of fire commissioners shall be conducted in accordance with chapter 42.30 RCW and a majority constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business. All records of the board shall be open to in- spection in accordance with the provisions of RCW 42- .17.250 through 42.17.340. The board has the power and duty to adopt a seal of the district, to manage and con- duct the business affairs of the district, to make and ex- ecute all necessary contracts, to employ any necessary services, and to adopt reasonable rules to govern the dis- trict and to perform its functions, and generally to per- form all such acts as may be necessary to carry out the objects of the creation of the district. [ 1984 c 230 § 37; 1939 c 34 § 32; RRS § 5654-132. Formerly RCW 52.12.100.] Open public meetings: Chapters 42.30. 4:.32 RCW 52.14.110 Purchases and public works—Competi- tive bids required — Exceptions. Insofar as practicable, purchases and any public works by the district shall be based on competitive bids. A formal sealed bid proce- dure shall be used as standard procedure for purchases and contracts for purchases executed by the board of commissioners. Formal sealed bidding shall not be re- quired for: (1) Emergency purchases if the sealed bidding proce- dure would prevent or hinder the emergency from being addressed appropriately. The term emergency means an occurrence that creates an immediate threat to life or property; (2) The purchase of any materials, supplies, or equip- ment if the cost will not exceed the sum of ten thousand dollars: Provided, That whenever the estimated cost is from forty –five hundred dollars up to ten thousand dol- lars, the commissioners shall require quotations from at least three different sources to be obtained in writing or by telephone, and recorded for public perusal to assure establishment of a competitive price for such purchase; (3) Contracting for work to be done involving the construction or improvement of a fire station or other buildings where the estimated cost will not exceed the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, which in- cludes the costs of labor, material, and equipment; (4) Purchases which are clearly and legitimately lim- ited to a single source of supply, or services, in which instances the purchase price may be best established by direct negotiation: Provided, That this subsection shall not apply to purchases or contracts relating to public works as defined in chapter 39.04 RCW; and (5) Purchases of insurance and bonds. [1984 c 238 § 3.] 52.14.120 Purchases and public works--- Competi- tive bidding procedures. (1) Notice of the call for bids shall be given by posting notice in three public places in the district and by publication once each week for two consecutive weeks. The posting and first publication (1937 Ed.) Finances 52.16.020 shall be at least two weeks before the date fixed for opening of the bids, and the publication shall be in a newspaper of general circulation within the district. If no bid is received on the first call, the commissioners may readvertise and make a second call, or may enter into a contract without a further call. (2) A public work involving three or more specialty contractors requires that the district retain the services of a general contractor as defined in RCW 18.27.010. [1984 c 238 § 4.] Chapter 52.16 FINANCES Sections 52.16.010 County treasurer as financial agent. 52.16.020 Funds. 52.16.030 Budget for each fund. 52.16.040 Tax levies— Assessment roll — Collection. 52.16.050 Disbursal of funds — Monthly reports. 52.16.061 General obligation bonds — Issuance— Limitations. 52.18.065 Property tax limited if service charge imposed. 52.16.070 Obligations shall not exceed taxes. revenues, and cash balances— Exceptions. 52.16.080 Bonds may be issued for capital purposes— Excess property tax levies. 52.16.130 General levy authorized— Limit — Excess levy at special election. 52.16.140 General levy may exceed limit — When. 52.16.150 Donations and bequests to district. 52.16.160 Tax levy by district where no township has been formed or where township disorganized and no longer making a levy. 52.16.170 Taxation and assessment of lands lying both within a fire protection district and forest protection a .c ment area. 52.16.010 County treasurer as financial agent. It is the duty of the county treasurer of the county in which any fire district created under this title is situated to re- ceive and disburse district revenues, to collect taxes and assessments authorized and levied under this title, and to credit district revenues to the proper fund. [1984 c 230 § 38; 1939 c 34 § 33; RRS § 5654 -133.] 52.16.020 Funds. In each county in which a fire protection district is situated, there shall be in the county treasurer's office of each district the following funds: (1) Expense fund; (2) reserve fund; (3) local im- provement district No. fund; (4) general obliga- tion bond fund; and (5) such other funds as the board of commissioners of the district may establish. Taxes levied for administrative, operative, and maintenance purposes and for the purchase of fire fighting and emergency medical equipment and apparatus and for the purchase of real property, when collected, and proceeds from the sale of general obligation bonds shall be placed by the county treasurer in the proper fund. Taxes levied for the payment of general obligation bonds and interest thereon, when collected, shall be placed by the county treasurer in the general obligation bond fund. The board of fire commissioners may include in its annual budget items of possible outlay to be provided for and held in reserve for any district purpose, and taxes shall be levied [Title 52 RCW--p 151 y`K 5it 7 14g:3r34L Oizaz.n-v bil r ye fi7ut a'ueh tk 4241:aczs4415V} ztraZ rsa Sttc estl4' S •VAMMI S` CM-4t1 7 ,C I. Washington State Boundary l ezezv Board For King County " 3600 136th S. E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 April 29, 1988 TO: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: G. BRICE MARTIN, Executive Secretary IN RE: NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO. 1450 CITY OF TUKWILA Proposed Annexation (K. C. F. P. D. #1) GBM /pr Encls. Notice of Hearing Rev. 7.21.87 As you know, the above - referenced proposal was filed by the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County effective At the meeting of the Board held April 21 1988 this proposed action was discussed. Subsequently, a Request for Review was executed pursuant to RCW 36.93.100(1) or (2). ' 1 ognos�, r, '�e�t�SY�ui.:.i'F•'.W1tiiw+.e�I , cs.i.,V C 21988 4 1 1 . 111..1 , L .11' ; '; r I i1 }1 %ixlL' ti` 5.• A: l Sd2l itt" S?. lti i' lc' cifw. 2YY' sU': �qt; kUxt9. ic'w1s7SA11'fVlal��wn,nrtne..fe snwka+. r wn�suwar�wlaw ...+.n.y.n.x.�wnmwrvrrVr..v a- _• Yw.wNL•.vneM titgX PAMVMS1La1 aOVIPP%51M X�4�S'u'Y: Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County 3600 136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 NOTICE OF HEARING FILE NO.. 1450 _ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Washington State Boundary Review Board for King County will hold a public hearing at 7:30 P.M. on Thursday, June 16, 1988, at the Foster High School Cafeteria, 4242 So. 144th, Seattle, Washington, for the purpose of considering the proposed annexation to the City of Tukwila of an area known as "Fire District No. 1 ", all in King County, Washington, said area being generally described as: The boundaries of King County Fire Protection District No. 1. (A copy of the full legal is available in the office of the Board.) DATED at Bellevue, Washington, this 22nd day of April, 1988. TM :ZSL?+lil`i+%`�."Ji4s Y �R7#s`��t�� AT SAID TIME AND PLACE, any and all interested persons may appear and be heard with reference to said proposal. WASHINGTON STAT BOUNDARY R EW BOARD FO KING COUNTY G. BRICE MARTIN, Ex tive Secretary April 22, 1988 Dear Larry: • Mr. Lawrence E. Hard l..eSourd and Fatten, F.S. 2400 Columbia Center 701 Fifth Avenue Seattle, WA. 98104 -7005 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT This letter is a follow -up of our meeting and comes after a number of meetings and consultations among members of our group. We currently operate under King County codes and regulations, and we are generally satisfied. In the event we are annexed by the City of Tukwila, we would like to have comparable conditions. We know that there will be some changes if we become part of incorporated Tukwila, but we are most anxious to retain our ability to make physical modifications to our facilities expeditiously. We feel that our recommendations could meet our needs while relieving unnecessary burdens on the City's regulatory agencies. Our primary concern is with "operationality," in other words, with our ability to do business. When considering how codes and regulations are applied, we are specifically concerned about their impacts on our unique modes of operation: 1. Time Permit applications and waiting periods for inspection and sign -off can increase the time it takes to accomplish changes. We frequently must respond quickly, and increases in the time it takes have serious negative consequences for us. Illogical Regulation In the County, we now conform to the various uniform codes. Over time we have made our investments and developed our operations in accordance with these codes and the County's regulations. Changes in application occasioned by the use of a new body of regulation imposed by new inspectors can lead to illogical situations. We wish to avoid these potential conflicts. Expense Delays, illogical regulations, and the need to respond to different requirements all create additional expense. Again, we are interested in providing healthful and safe facilities efficiently and without undue increases in cost. ;,72. '1,1.:47.:•1`, , : o, u.. w_ z •r,:eo: rr*,Y. >n:nrsaa ±;;•l: «cqi: %k7? MR. LAWRENCE E. HARD APRIL 22, i 9BS FACE: 2 v �r,„ Kl .', fa x; ���7 ,•;rr:4+ra.pxei�� "'zr...�.�. i.bi�. �d' �.. n .,...::aiss:.'.��x:x;`•"�i ,..;).afa',1:. 4„ Construction Schedules Our current arrangements in the county allow us to meet tight schedules with site clearing, excavation, and foundation work done prior to building permit issuance. This process allows us to meet the demaridi ng schedules imposed on us. We are clearly searching for some approach which will avoid the conflicts which can develop from the application of a new set of governmental rules. We suggest exploration of a "master" or "umbrella" permit which could streamline the existing processes. The Boeing Company currently has a "master permit" arrangement with the state as it applies to electrical work. The City of Seattle also uses a master permit approach. We propose using a similar approach. Tukwila's current practices call for periodic fire inspections, but have building inspections only when a permit has been obtained or the fire inspection finds some unpermitted changes which need to be addressed. Tukwila allows few exceptions to the work which must be permitted. The city's more detailed review differs from the conventions in use in King County where practice has allowed us to proceed with many modifications without need of permits. A master permit approach could well legitimize the way we currently operate and bridge the gap between the different approaches used by the City and the County. The following are some possible characteristics of a master permit: 1. The master (building) permit would be granted annually. Each individual site would require a master permit. 3. Definitions of site would include a minimum lot and structural size. 4. The master permit would be granted only to firms which are self- insured for industrial accident coverage. 5 The master permit would carry a minimum fee which would be based on an estimate of inspection hours and would cover inspections up to that number of hours. Additional inspection hours would be billed at the appropriate hourly rate if needed. MR. LAWRENCE E. HARD APRIL 22, 1988 PAGE 7 b. The master permit would apply only to work which was done in existing structures and to that work which did not alter the structural characteristics of the building. All new construction would require individual permits, as would any work affecting the load - bearing elements of any building. 7. For the Boeing Company, which maintains its own fire department, Boeing fire safety officers shall be authorized to review and sign off on safety system installations in Boeing owned properties. As we considered the various options, it became clear that we have a significantly different type of operation from most of those in Tukwila. It might be appropriate to negotiate the addition of review and inspection capability to provide sufficient capacity to meet our needs. This would create the opportunity to have staff knowledgable and sensitive to our type of operation as well as addressing workload and time commitment problems. We have met with other companies who now have operations in Tukwila. We interviewed a number of them to check our perceptions and get their advice regarding the regulatory processes in the city. Based on our own discussions and their comments, we feel that we must have some approach of this type in order to avoid unacceptable impacts. Both you and the Mayor have been most helpful in getting this approach started; we anticipate a successful conclusion of this problem - solving process. We look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, R.W. Wilkinson Jr. c:c. Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor of Tukwila The Boeing Company Jorgensen Steel Rhone Poulenc ----"1" .. 8401170172 ticor title insurance statutory warranty Deed asunta desimone assunta city of seattle south base annexation the arc of a nen-tangent curve to the left, haying a radius • ,t • • ..'.1, f,s. fists these North 7.43etr pot Nu•os test to west _. ;.- .....,..:..." rapt winsIna My smiths tendon. of. . , • ' ■ ••••••• •• {1eY�es;.arit aiiVa.i`J4r,:id"a idled Staff! ;kr..tvw.u.ux:m,u a .....,... ..,..+..,«........,....ww... ..,.a,. lftel W]GL;:7Vi5".iS4e";f:Ra4 'wit'.G ,Y.' tg' ;e i;arihM.ti'_t .. . D PAR Ref. 9.30 TO: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, ASSOCIATE PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: `PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst. IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING - AMENDED CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock Dept. of Parks, Planning and Resources - ATTN: Mr. James C. Tracy, Deputy Director. C) r! lj Ti F. Fo R! 1E.:Ikt1IC11 Vi `L,I _; • APR ?_ 51988 Washington State Boundary For King County 3600 136th S. E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 April 14, 1988 The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office is now acceptable for filing and has been filed effective March 28, 1988 and assigned File No. 1450. You will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action. As you are aware, a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County Council by this office. This was under date of March 27, 1987 Any revisions to the legal description subsequent to that date must be incorporated in your final ordinance /resolution filed with the King County Council. PLEASE NOTE: The final Environmental Impact Statement was received in the BRB office on March 28. Receipt of this document is necessary prior to official filing of the proposal. %:' A? 41�rsaSiamtsiiicaE4k' r7si a!,: rus^ A��e wte�• ��. �:.± ac��F : O PAR I .9.30 IN RE: NOTIFICATION OF OFFICIAL FILING FILE NO. 1450 CITY OF TUKWILA Proposed Annexation (K. C. F.P. D. #1) 7A-LB2A :'. lC* 1,;: �' Cn;:`! Al$ it6s" oaV , F,,,M=AnTk�.a��:'^53.';.:}O W`MU��s�M .Lw .P{? r 1988 Washington State Boundary Re�i � y For King County TO: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, ASSISTANT PLANNER CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst. CC: Clerk of the Council, ATTN: Helene Mociulski Dept. of Public Works, ATTN: Rex Knight Dept. of Assessments, ATTN: Diane Murdock Dept. of Parks, Planning and Resources - ATTN: Mr. James C. Tracy, Deputy Director. 3600136th S.E., Suite 122 Bellevue, WA 98006 Telephone (206) 296 -7096 April 4, 1988 The Notice of Intention transmitted to this office is now acceptable for filing and has been filed effective February 17, 1988 and assigned File No. 1450 You will be kept advised of all transactions affecting this action. As you are aware, a copy of your Notice was transmitted to the King County Council by this office. This was under date of March 27, 1987 Any revisions to the legal description subsequent to that date must be incorporated in your final ordinance /resolution filed with the King County. Council. ...,.... �.. w... w... o-... ww.+ r........+. .....nw��- rsu�rr�+c�at>xtrMtnx +: ttll JniLl�r!( NFt. K' t17SK4'�`.'b.S'.Cl5tY.Y.N".HS7: r'IY,2Yr`�iY.` � City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Inga Rafatjah CEEUD- IM -SML APO NY 09757 Subject: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION Dear Ms. Rafatjah: I hope this answers your question. MCB /sjn March 31, 1988 Sewer systems are historically installed through Local Improvement Districts (LIDs). If the area annexes to Tukwila, the property owners would have the opportunity to form an LID for sewer installation. Our feedback to this date has been a general unwillingness to pay for such improvements. The City's sewer utility will not automatically, upon annexation, provide a sewer system for unsewered areas. Information from the King County Health Department is that if you have an exist- ing legal lot of record and you can show that a septic system will work, you may install a system. Even if your lot(s) are less than the minimum standard, which is currently 12,500 square feet. Septic tanks would continue to be regulated by King County after annexation. Under the areas current status in unincorporated county you do not have the opportunity to improve the area with sewers. If the area annexes you and the area's other property owners will have the opportunity that was not there before. Sincerely, ;,:at - Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner Members of the Tukwila City Planning Commission Hon. Gary Van Dusen, Mayor Mr. Byron G. Sneva, Director Department of Public Works Ms. Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington, 98188 Re: Sanitary Sewer Service K. Cnty. Fire District #1 Annexation Planning cases 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R and 88 -1 -CA Ladies and Gentlemen: SPIDER STAGING CORPORATION Corporate Headquarters 13536 Beacon Coal Mine Rd. S. Seattle, Washington 98178 (206) 255.8267 March 29, 1988 Spider Staging Corporation is located within the boundaries of Tuckwila's proposed annexation of King County Fire District #1, known to you under the above case numbers. Our manufacturing plant is located at 13536 Beacon Coal Mine Road South, which places us to the East of the railroad right -of -way bisecting the annexation area, and also immediately to the East of the Seattle Rendering Works plant. The issue of immediate concern to our Company, and the one on which we request the direction of City administrative officials, and which we would also like the Planning Commission to take note of at your March 31 Public Hearing, has to do with sanitary sewage disposal. At present, our manufacturing facility generates only a small amount of "domestic" effluent (we have some 95 employees on- site), which has been disposed of via an on -site drainfield for many years. However, King County's Department of Health has determined that the drainfield is in a failing condition, and has directed us to Atlanta Baltimore Boston Chicago Cleveland Dallas Detroit Houston Los Angeles New Orleans New York Orlando Philadelphia San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Vancouver, B.C. Washington, D.C. .s�f:•a.:ai�nv+;.s..uv...+....- - - __...__ aw7. 44rA: zftVAI ILi,Va.:a:1=VIINIVO......6 some other method of lawful sewage disposal. We must take action on this matter in the very near future. Since annexation would probably impact our plant site in a number of ways, we've looked into your proposal to some extent; however, we find that, apparently, Tuckwila is unwilling to directly address the question of sewage disposal for our area at this time. Since this sort of service is the principal justification for an annexation, we are most concerned about your City's position. We therefore ask that the City's administrative officers respond to the following inquiries, addressing both our company and making the responses part of the Planning Commission record on this annexation: 1) When, and at what cost to Spider, will sanitary sewage disposal services be provided to the Beacon Coal Mine Road South area, in the Southeastern end of the proposed annexation area? 2) If sanitary sewage disposal services will not be made available to the Beacon Coal Mine Road South area in the very near future, what types of sanitary sewage disposal methods may we legally use at our plant site; and if the area is annexed as planned, how long may we continue to use the various permissible methods of sewage disposal? 3) If we invest in an on -site septic system acceptable to King County's Department of Health, can we safely assume that this system, as long as functional, will be acceptable to Tukwila after annexation? As you might imagine, it is critically important that we receive a prompt and concise response to the foregoing; our thanks for your attention. HAND DELIVERED 3/29/88 Cordial Adrao C arles A. S aw Staff Counsel cc: Seattle Rendering King County Dept. of Health City of Renton Planning Dept. % .. SUBJECT: PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF FIRE DISTRICT 1 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Tukwila City Council FROM: Curtis Nesheim DATE: March 28,1988 After study of the E.I.S. concerning the proposed annexation of Fire District I, I am left with some questions and conclusions that I, respectfully, would like to bring to your attention. Some months ago at a meeting of the Tukwila 2000 Task Force, City Council mem- ber, Mae Harris, spoke in favor of further annexation. In short, she stated, in effect, that the city needed more size to give it more clout in regional affairs. I do not dispute the sentiment in any way but with one exception. I am concerned that the price we will pay in this instance may be too high. At a similar meeting, same committee, I too spoke in favor of further annexation, but my preference was for a different area; one which would not have an adverse financial impact. According to the E.I.S. the key issues of this proposal are in the service, fiscal, and land -use impacts to which I agree. My questions and further com- ments follow: 1. I t appears that the infrastructure of the proposed annexation area is generally below the standards of Tukwila. Do we want to take on more of this when the city as we know it now needs further upgrading? 2. Sewer systems in much of Fire District I are either inadequate or non- existent. It that the septic tank systems in Allentown are un- desirable. They will have to be replaced with a sewer system. It is possible to defray this cost against the home owners involved. However, when you consider that the home owners in this case are largely on low or fixed income, it does not appear to be a viable alternative. In my PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF FIRE DISTRICT I opinion the city cannot escape the costs of a new sewer system. How will the city finance this? Also, we have septic tank systems within . our present city boundaries; they may need to be replaced by a sewer system in the future. 3. Some of the water systems in the proposed area are below our city standards, namely, Water District 25. No doubt the city would have to take over and operate while at the same time bring things up to an acceptable. level. 4. Street lighting- some good and some non - existent- a fact which also applies to some of our own present city area. Nesheim phi +, iv:.�'f13:l:�:C.'tR :i ein :•�,e 1'. �•Y.;ri -.., 5. Flooding- surface water and erosion management will be a problem at times_ this together with some pollution. It is another problem for which it is very difficult to anticipate the costs. 6. A number of streets, arterials, etc. are below Tukwila standards and are subject to considerable traffic congestion. The cost to improve and maintain those streets appear to be considerable. How will the city ad- dress the problem? We have streets in our present city that need improve- ment. 7. Much of the proposed annexation is Class III Landslide and Seismic Hazard area which reflects unstable soil conditions and sensitivity to seismic activity. It is anyone's guess how much this may cost the city of Tukwila in the future. 8. Forty mobile homes in Allentown would become non - conforming uses. How will the city meet that problem? 9. Most of the upgrading of the infrastructure will be needed in the first ten (10) years due to the existing over - capacity conditions. How will the city finance that? I don't believe the tax revenue from the area will '-: :f`j'.nY�Y:+:4a %.ifn'':�;J{v�w .._Ln:i2?:1>. ::•��i. _ PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF FIRE DISTRICT I completely support it. ...... n. o �. �. w+......,.......................- .................,....+.T.. ...�.......,..,......�.... n,......a.r.�rw...ra...pK; . u. mn+..ar..n�M*for..n+4t?x «St�^f 77i:".'Cli'FOrii>u.�', ",. .. Nesheim 10. The elongated shape of the proposed annexation would affect police response time. It would no doubt require a satellite station which translates into more policemen, more equipment, plus the cost of the station. It appears that the impact on the city budget would be significant. Will the tax revenue from the annexation mitigate the entire cost? I don't think so. 11. The Planning Department would have an increased load. Would tax revenues from the annexed area take care of this? We will need additional Building Code enforcement officers and planners. 12. The E.I.S. indicates that revenues from the tax base will mitigate any increased park costs. It seems to me that this is a guess. 13. It has been shown in many instances that citizen expectation of services increases after annexation and rightly so. In cities, responce time for police is usually better than in unincorporated areas creating a higher level of service. It gives people more confidence- that the police will do something and, therefore, they will report more crimes. 14. Land area will increase substantially, and it appears that we can expect costs beyond what the study shows. The amount of those costs is largely unknown, but experience tells us they will be there and they must be reckoned with. Will these costs be offset by the added tax base? I do not think so. In conclusion, I believe that the proposed annexation of Fire District I would be counter productive for the city of Tukwila. We would acquire only 1900 additional people, but we would increase geographically by 50%. ' �. ��.+ P.,:' F: ivaizo*v'a1:E''7a,k41�'x'4T az rY. , i}G 1011Y191R. (19∎VitibuuaatV tewaaVOr. ssnro Is there any plan to put in sewers in the Allentown area? We own lots 27 -28 and there is no way we can build on it because the lot has to be to ; there is a sewer. Lot is only 75s Hence my et In _a Ra at ah CEEUD- IM -SML APO NY 09757 AP, 1988 CITY DEPT. r'- ieV9i:.ii440, iarzw 2*�i:YSk . `.""+'S 4VA;gi3; A41e1 wvros • I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: [[ Notice of Public Hearing El Notice of Public Meeting [i Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [[ Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [� Planning Commission Agenda Packet [] Short Subdivision Agenda Packet A F F ( . . D A V I T O F D I ST RjUT I ON 0 Notice of Application for Q Other Shoreline Management Permit Q Shoreline Management Permit (] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on ) YL44_- k , 19 . Task Force Members Name of Project Fire District #1 Annexation File Number R7 =1 -4 _ [] Determination of Nonsignificance [[ Mitigated Determination of Non - significance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [� Notice of Action [� Official Notice Ms. Bonnie Corey 11801 - 40th Avenue South Seattle, Washington 98168 Subject: ANNEXATION ISSUES Dear Ms. Corey: Cite of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 City Council 433-1800 March 25, 1988 I'm glad you wrote the Tukwila City Council because it gives us a chance to know what you're thinking and to answer your questions. You stated that you think Tukwila wants to upgrade areas with the annexation. Let me assure you that our intent is to respect your neighborhood as it is, and to listen to what you citizens want. We have no intention of widening streets and undergrounding wiring without finding out if citizens want it, getting it into our list of future capital improvements, and getting approval for funds needed. When improvements are done by Local Improvement Districts (L.I.D.$), the voters in the district where the benefits will be done vote whether or not they will accept the assessment for the project. For example, if your street were to be improved and paid for by an L.I.D., you and your neighbors would vote to either accept or turn down the L.I.D. In that way, as well as by letting your thoughts about improvements be known, you have very strict control over what is done in your neighborhood. In response to your question about septic tanks, please believe Tukwila does not intend to automatically require sewer systems upon annexation. As you pointed out, it is the Health Department that approves or disapproves of septic tanks. We recognize residents' concerns about septic tanks and will work to resolve any problems the tanks pose. The City's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Fire District No. 1 does show that the Allentown water system needs to be improved. I don't know how the improvements will be funded, though some combination of grants, L.I.D.s and possible utility funding seems likely. Ms. Bonnie Corey March 25, 1988 Page 2 Again, please understand we don't want to change your life any more than you want it to be changed. Our city is already made of neighborhoods that are distinct from one another because they are neighborhoods. Allentown would be a delightful addition to our City, but it doesn't have to become like the other parts of Tukwila. I hope this answers most of your questions. We don't know all the answers yet, but we will work with you and your community to get them, and to address prob- lems that may come regardless of whether you annex or not. Please write again, come to City hall, or come to our public hearings for the annexation if you have other questions. I think you'll find us ready to listen. LL /sjn Sincerely, Mae Harris, President Tukwila City Council !� , :� .. TASK FORCE MEMBERS 0' Moira Carr Bradshaw N March 18, 1988 MEETING TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 5:00 P.M., CONFERENCE RM. #3 Enclosed is the subject pre- annexation comprehensive plan and zoning code amendment staff report. On Tuesday the Task Force will review the proposal to formulate their recom- mendations on the proposed actions. Tuesday, March 29, can be a backup evening if more time is needed. The Planning Commission meeting will be Thursday, March 31, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Planning Commission public hearing procedure is as follows: 1. Open the Public Hearing 2. Staff presentation of proposal and recommendation 3. Proponent testimony 4. Opponent testimony 5. Proponent testimony 6. Close the Public Hearing 7. Planning Commission discussion 8. Planning Commission motion on recommendations We will arrange for the Task Force to be the first speaker. If you have any questions, call me at 433 -1848. MCB /co Enclosure A F F ( D A V I T • Notice of Public Hearing • Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project Fire District #1 Annexation File Number 87 -1 -A OF DI STR()UT I ON JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: (] Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance C1 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [j Notice of Action Q Official Notice O Other [] Other , 19 I, ! JOANNF JOHNSON O Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [] Planning Commission Agenda Packet [] Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 'AF DAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: J Shoreline Management Permit 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, MARCH 24, 1988 (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project FIRE DIST #1 ANNEXATION FEIS File Number 87 -1 -A O Determination of Nonsignificance 0 Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice Other FTRF IITSTRTCT #1 ANNEXATION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMT , 19 . .n,. - �.r Vm . i :.,c 7.r. •i� ?;ifIN r;M+...r'? a.•,S �Sw.nT7A._t�- gr:: ,. K+ at:: �czta. r. iL:: a:.:. z': us_ t2. �':. t'!:.' 4G1.;. aa�..:. c: nm, �. r✓..: r, Y:,...>. a_ ti�ne�:.. x::..: c. xa;. ��.. e6c^ r.'... r:' araf".::•; 7; 3�7�^_,., �`.' c�: trti n.:. a,:...:.},': �; �. , ...:,.. , ` ����".°- Z-.. : se i City ty o f Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Mr. Brice Martin King County Boundary Review Board 3600 - 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, WA 98006 Subject: PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 - BRB FILE NO. 145OP Dear Mr. Martin: MCB /sjn cc: Jim Tracy Larry Springer March 23, 1988 The City of Tukwila requests the Boundary Review Board hold a public hearing on the proposed annexation of Fire District No. 1 to Tukwila. This request for review is per RCW 36.93.100(2). We are responding to a Petition for Election form of annexation, submitted to the City by residents of the annexation area. The legal description attached to the petition contains several boundary irregularities, which our City Attorney has advised can only be changed by the BRB. Changes are needed, where possible, to move the boundary line out from the center of buildings and /or parcels and out to the centerline of the Duwamish River. The City is also dependent upon the BRB in modifying the subject proposal to be consistent with the previous and the under consideration interlocal agreements on a common boundary with the City of Renton. The City's desire is to propose an annexation area and legal description that is acceptable to affected agencies and residents. We therefore request postponement of your tentative May 3 public hearing to June 16 or 23. If neither of these is possible, a June 2 hearing would be necessary to continue with the November election time frame. We appreciate your attention and consideration of the proposal. Sincerel Ga'y L. Van Dusen Mayor AFI •,..w.DAVIT 0 Notice of Public Hearing L Notice of Public Meeting 51•* .nnvwv ............,............. vo. u........,. ......w.,.....,.,w..a...,.w..»x ∎v.m .waxr..V.I.tf mvx CI.IW I.IVX ZIWZ1ktSiiSfnr A.VIZ CHt S' e. V�; .:4: Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Planning Commission Agenda Packet Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit (J Shoreline Management Permit (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project Fire District #1 Annexation File Number 87 -1 —A OF DISTRUTION JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: J Determination of Nonsignificance (] Mitigated Determination of Non - significance J Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action O Official Notice (] Other Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on March 18, 1988 , 19 . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MCB /co Enclosure City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TASK FORCE MEMBERS \ 01 0 Moira Carr Bradshaw N March 18, 1988 MEETING TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 5:00 P.M., CONFERENCE RM. #3 Enclosed is the subject pre- annexation comprehensive plan and zoning code amendment staff report. On Tuesday the Task Force will review the proposal to formulate their recom- mendations on the proposed actions. Tuesday, March 29, can be a backup evening if more time is needed. The Planning Commission meeting will be Thursday, March 31, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Planning Commission public hearing procedure is as follows: 1. Open the Public Hearing 2. Staff presentation of proposal and recommendation 3. Proponent testimony 4. Opponent testimony 5. Proponent testimony 6. Close the Public Hearing 7. Planning Commission discussion 8. Planning Commission motion on recommendations We will arrange for the Task Force to be the first speaker. If you have any questions, call me at 433 -1848. I, JOANNE JOHNSON El Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting [[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [J Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit Name of Project FIRE DIST. #1 ANNEXATION File Number 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA 87 -1 —A hereby declare that: (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) A F( ;; D A V IT OF D I S T O....r B U T I O N (] Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance Q Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action Q Official Notice O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on FRIDAY, MARCH 18, 1988 [] Other , 19 . City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will conduct a public hearing on March 31, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, to consider the following: Planning Commission Public Hearing Case Number: 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Applicant: City of Tukwila Request: Area -wide amendments to: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Zoning Code Location: Proposed annexation area of Fire District No. 1, generally bounded by the City of Seattle, Empire Way, City of Renton, City of Tukwila, East Marginal Way and the Duwamish River. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Department. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Valley Daily News - Sunday March 20, 1988 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, File 6f91 -tV► (9O ) 91 RA6uolBulUsoM pJonelnog Jelueoulnos OOl9 INWJ111Vd30'JNINNV1d el!humi 3o Am '9061 V i b MAK MI a9° MS VW En Fri g A' n 9 O N . N 1 m m .N TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary 1. Vanousen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TASK FORCE MEMBERS 0� Moira Carr Bradshaw N March 18, 1988 MEETING TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 5:00 P.M., CONFERENCE RM. #3 Enclosed is the subject pre- annexation comprehensive plan and zoning code amendment staff report. On Tuesday the Task Force will review the proposal to formulate their recom- mendations on the proposed actions. Tuesday, March 29, can be a backup evening if more time is needed. The Planning Commission meeting will be Thursday, March 31, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The Planning Commission public hearing procedure is as follows: We will arrange for the Task Force to be the first speaker. If you have any questions, call me at 433 -1848. MCB /co Enclosure 1. Open the Public Hearing 2. Staff presentation of proposal and recommendation 3. Proponent testimony 4. Opponent testimony 5. Proponent testimony 6. Close the Public Hearing 7. Planning Commission discussion 8. Planning Commission motion on recommendations HEARING DATE: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: ACREAGE: SEPA DETERMINATION: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 ZONING DISTRICT: See Attachment E STAFF REPORT to the Planning Commission and City Council Prepared March 17, 1988 March 31, 1988 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA City of Tukwila Annexation area -wide amendments to: 1. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map 2. Zoning Map and annexation area and City -wide amendments to 3. Zoning Code Fire District No. 1 annexation area, north and northeast of current City limits (see Attachment A) and City of Tukwila Approximately 2.6 square miles or 1,700 acres COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: See Attachments C and D Determination of Significance - see Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (A) Annexation Area Boundary and Street Map (B) Sub -Area Map (C) King County Comprehensive /Highline Plan Map (D) Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (E) Existing Land Use Map (F) King County Zoning (G) Pre - annexation Zoning - 1979 - Allentown (H) Pre - annexation Zoning - 1979 - Riverton (I) Tukwila Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map (J) Tukwila Proposed Sub -Area 1 Zoning (K) Tukwila Proposed Sub -Area 3 Zoning (L) Tukwila Proposed Sub -Areas 2 and 4 Zoning (M) Tukwila Proposed Height Exception Area vrAtala STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council BACKGROUND 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 2 Process In January 1987, the City of Tukwila received a petition signed by residents within the boundaries of King County's Fire District No. 1. The petition requests the City to consider and approve annexation of the Fire District's area and requests that an election by residents of the area be established. Amending the City's Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Code and Map are essential to the annexation decisions to be made by the City and area resi- dents and property owners. The pre- annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments and comparable zoning are now before the Planning Commission and analyzed in this report. The Commission is to make recommendations to the City Council on this proposal. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared for the annexation and land use actions In September and December of 1987, the Planning Staff held land use meetings in the community. Concerns raised during those meetings are contained in this report. Those meetings also caused the formation of an Annexation Task Force to study the area and the issues. Separately, the task force will present their analysis and recommendations to the Commission and Council. State law requires the City Council to hold two public hearings of its own on the proposal. After the second hearing, the Council is to adopt by ordinance the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments to become effec- tive upon annexation. During previous unsuccessful annexations, the Tukwila City Council adopted pre- annexation zoning for the areas shown on Attachments F and G. Now those ordinances must be repealed by the proposed subsequent ordinances. Report Organization The report is divided into four sections. The first section (blue) is an Executive Summary of the entire staff report. It highlights the contents of the other three sections and contains the recommended actions. The second section (orange) addresses the Comprehensive Plan issues and the amendment of the City's map. The third section (yellow) addresses zoning districts and their delineation on the zoning map. The fourth section (pink) addresses amendments to the text of the zoning code to provide com- parable zones to King County zones. ..� V : fif: it..� i STAFF REPORT to Planning 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Commission /City Council Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 88 -1 -CPA: AREA -WIDE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS An amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan is necessary because: 1. The City's Planning Area needs to be expanded to include sections of the proposed annexation area. 2. Changes are needed in the existing plan to accommodate the intensity and type of land uses that have developed in the area since 1977 when the City adopted its existing plan (see pages 4 through 7). Recommendation: Approve Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map shown on Attachment I. 88 -1 -R: AREA -WIDE PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING The Tukwila zoning classifications which most closely compare with the existing County zoning classifications are proposed for the annexation area (see Table 1, page 8). Several exceptions are made from the above table to accommodate differences between the County and City Zoning Codes when existing uses are impacted. These exceptions are noted on pages 8 through 10. Recommendation: Approve the proposed zoning maps shown on Attachments J, K, and L. 88 -1 -CA ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS The code comparison undertaken in the previous section reveals impacts that will occur to the annexation area because of Tukwila's zoning code restrictions. Amend- ments to the City's code are proposed (see pink section) to deal with these use and site restrictions. The proposed amendments will affect the entire city, not just the subject annexation area. In the M -2 zone, changes are proposed to accommodate steel manufacturing pro- cesses, truck terminals, and training facilities. A Height Exception Area is proposed for several M -2 and M -1 districts adjacent to East Marginal Way, and a height restriction map is imposed to accommodate King County International Airport. Finally, a compromise proposal is presented to allow manufactured homes as replacements for existing mobile and manufactured homes in annexation areas. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council 88 -1 -CPA: AREA -WIDE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS FINDINGS �nrnwrt��sr ca.t . i. rru..: tY'.: Ytt').l. Yl: n:+ i; • tttlriHY*Jar. 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 4 Existing Comprehensive Planning 1. Three levels of comprehensive land use planning exist in the area. The King County Comprehensive Plan (April 1985) is a general policy plan which desig- nates the entire annexation area as Urban - areas planned for growth where urban standards shall apply. The Allentown area has an Open Space Designa- tion along the east bank of the Duwamish River for a public park and recreation area. 2. The second level of planning is the more detailed King County Highline Com- munity Plan (November 1977), augmenting the Comprehensive Plan. Only those areas shown on Attachment C were given land use designations typically found in community plans. The plan shows Industrial and Light Industrial designa- tions for areas adjacent to East Marginal Way. 3. The third level of planning is the comprehensive plans of the cities which plan beyond their current limits to encompass a planning area or sphere of influence. Tukwila's and Renton's planning areas cover portions of the annexation area (Attachment D). 4. Detailed information on Land Use /Housing /Population (pages 15 -24), Transpor- tation (pages 25 -50), the Natural Environment (pages 10 -24), and Utilities (pages 80 -91) are contained in the DEIS. Only changes from the existing conditions or impacts are highlighted herein. 5. The character of the areas are clearly developed, shaped by the existing land uses, the topography, and the transportation and utility systems. 6. The proposed Comprehensive Plan Map (Attachment I) makes no area -wide changes. The small changes proposed are mentioned herein. 7. Sub -Area 1: a. There is little undeveloped land. Therefore, any change would occur through redevelopment. b. The Highline Plan (Attachment C) designates the majority of the area as Industry. This designation describes heavy industrial uses including large -scale manufacturing and assembling, fabrication and processing, bulk handling and shipping, large warehousing and storage and heavy trucking. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan does not include this area. c. Proposed is a land use designation of Heavy Industrial (Attachment J), similar to the Highline Plan. An exception is a small light industrial designation at the northwest corner of the Boeing Access Road and Martin Luther King, Jr. Way intersection. 8. Sub -Area 2: STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council u^.. +r�rn+�+m: Ott <.+. _tY ?.Krn^+;�•:,�d:�r •>;.`.,, ;,.` lr'. . . k 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 5 a. The Highline Community Plan did not designate this area. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan does not cover this area. b. Based upon existing land uses, designations of office, commercial, light industrial and high density residential are proposed (Attachment I). 9. Sub -Area 3: a. The City of Renton considers the area south of South 133rd Street to be within their planning area and designates the area for Multi- family, Heavy Industrial, and Greenbelt. b. The area is not within the City of Tukwila's Planning Area. The County has designated the area as Urban but the Highline Plan did not designate this area. c. The Tukwila proposed land uses designations are consistent with the existing character of the area except for Light Industrial at the southeast tip adjacent to Renton. Renton has indicated that they are proposing amendments of their Comprehensive Plan to redesignate areas currently shown as Heavy Industry as Office Park. 10. Sub -Area 4: a. The Allentown /Duwamish neighborhood is one of the few remaining resi- dential communities in the Duwamish River Valley. The majority of the residents are concerned about retaining the overall quality of their residential neighborhood and the inability to locate individual mobile homes on a single lot if annexed to Tukwila. A property owner would like to request additional Light Industrial at the north end of the neighborhood adjacent to the Burlington Northern railroad right -of -way. b. The Tukwila Comprehensive Plan designates all the existing residential areas except for one block (Light Industrial) as Low Density Residen- tial. The proposal is to continue these designations. The Union Tank Works, the Hub Center, and some adjacent parcels fronting 51st Place South would be redesignated as Heavy Industrial from Light Industrial. c. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan designates all the industrial areas as Light Industrial. The Highline Plan designates areas along East Mar- ginal Way as Industry and Light Manufacturing (see Attachments D and C). The proposal is to redesignate all of the industrial areas along East Marginal Way with one exception as Heavy Industrial. d. The Comprehensive Plan will also show a public facility designation for the METRO facility on East Marginal Way, and for the fire station and the church on 42nd Avenue South. e. A Parks and Open Space designation will continue along the east bank of the Duwamish River between 42nd and the I -5 crossing. The City Light STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council CONCLUSIONS .....« ...✓w.w�..•.env- rv...w..u.r... «. •m': +roc`xnS "..efl :�cYlrx¢v"fiTf.Syt`iSM:GR't; is '.74f4.711 ;., w �� • + ii i '.. . 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 6 right -of -way west and south of the Duwamish is changed from public facility to Parks and Open Space to be consistent with the Duwamish Trail Plan. f. Commercial and Medium - Density Residential designations have been given to the existing uses along 42nd Avenue. 1. The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map amendments and additions are reflective of a) existing plans for the area, b) the level and type of established uses in the areas, c) the infrastructure serving the areas, d) topography of the areas, and e) public comment. 2. Sub -Area 1: a. Strong relationships exist between transportation facilities (road, water, rail and air) to provide accessory /service uses to the primary uses in the area. Boeing Company relies upon King County International Airport. Rhone Poulence relies upon barge delivery of lumber by- products. Other uses have made locational and capital investment deci- sions based on the unique characteristics of the rail and road access and the land use environment. b. The Heavy Industrial designation is consistent with the existing commu- nity plan and character of the area. 3. Sub -Area 2: a. The proposed designations are reflective of the low- density residential character that is due in part to the steepness of the area. More in- tense designations are given to parcels along major arterials and /or to accomplish transition between diverse intensity of or incompatible uses. b. The low density residential designation remains for an auto repair shop on 51st because the use is not considered compatible with the adjacent neighborhood residential environment. The City's Comprehensive Land Use policy encourages the abatement of incompatible land uses in viable residential areas (Policy 5, page 46). 4. Sub -Area 3: a. The proposed designations are inconsistent with the proposed Renton Greenbelt and Office Park designations for the area, but are consistent with the majority of their existing plan for the area and /or provide designations which are consistent with existing zoning. id: xn m is%`w'.2�'s ii wa:aletzrn +7rc±ts 5. Sub -Area 4: Y1. -Com. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council a. Several changes to the existing Tukwila Comprehensive Plan are necessary to reflect significant changes that have occurred in the area and to more accurately reflect the type or intensity of uses. Heavy Industrial provides the necessary intensity level reflective of service and use in the area. b. Any further transitioning of use between the rail /truck terminal and the Allentown /Duwamish neighborhood would increase the degree of use incompatibility already in existence. The neighborhood is small and has a limited number of streets. Additional industrial is not conducive to stabilizing or improving the quality of the neighborhood nor is there infrastructure in place to support intensification of use. RECOMMENDATION :YSCt�T' +tMYSAS:MStCt7Kf LSW1- : q 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 7 Based upon the above findings and conclusions, Planning staff recommends approval of Attachment I, Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map. �n�o': ti�nv�}. ��r" i. wtFii24y^.:, x; �9c7. t�M�s+. vw�a..,... v�... �+ w........•........_ ..................._.___,......•.._.,..._.................. �.....,..,...... w�. o... �.... ne.«........ ti. �...: w,.+.. �3i..,.>.. w..... �. �n... w�. �. s...xMC�w...+at+rtu�we�caY..ans ... STAFF REPORT to Planning 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Commission/ City Council Page 8 88 -1 -R: AREA -WIDE PRE - ANNEXATION ZONING FINDINGS 1. Upon receipt of the annexation petition, the City Council directed City staff to prepare pre- annexation zoning for the area comparable to existing King County Zoning. 2. Tukwila zones do not exactly duplicate King County's, but the following table provides the most comparable zones with reference to uses. RM -900 High Density Multi- Family/ Office (48.4 dwelling units per acre B -N Neighborhood Business B -C Community Business M -P Manufacturing Park M -L Light Manufacturing M -H Heavy Manufacturing EXCEPTIONS TO COMPARABLE ZONES Table 1 COMPARABLE ZONING CATEGORIES King County Tukwila S -R, SR -9600, RS -7200 Single Family Residential (1, 4.5, 6.05 dwelling units per acre, respectively) RM -2400 Medium Density Multi- Family R -4 Low Apartments (18.15 dwelling units per acre) (21.8 dwelling units per acre) R -1 -7.2 Single- Family Residential (6.05 dwelling units per acre) RMH Multi- residence High Density (29 dwelling units per acre) C -1 Community Retail Business C -2 Regional Retail Business C -M Industrial Park M -1 Light Industrial M -2 Heavy Industrial (Also see Appendix C of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a summary and comparison of the purpose and standards of both the existing and proposed zones.) 1. Sub -Area 2 Attachment L shows three exceptions that are intended to accomplish transi- tion between commercial and residential uses, continue a nonconforming use, and address a logical extension of multiple- family zoning. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 9 2. Sub -Area 3 a. Mobile home parks are permitted in County RM zones subject to admin- istrative site plan approval whereas in Tukwila a public site plan approval process (unclassified use) is required. b. Tukwila does not have a zone as dense as the County's RM -900 (48.4 units per acre). The RM -900 district is developed with a trailer park and another parcel appears to be only partially developed with a four -unit structure. 3. Sub -Area 4 a. Many areas within Sub -Areas 3 and 4 are on septic systems and are not within a sewer provider's service area. The King County Health Depart- ment regulates septic tank approvals and inspections. Many of the lots in Allentown /Duwamish and Foster Point have already been subdivided below the minimum standards that currently are required for septic installation - 12,500 square feet. The Health Department however will allow septic systems on pre- existing lots of less than minimum size if the soil tests prove adequate. The City of Tukwila could encourage urban densities of 7,200 square feet for the areas. This will more closely reflect existing lot size, would encourage densities that reflect the area's urban character, and possi- bly give a density that might support future sewer improvements. Any further subdivisions to this size would however be prohibited until sewer service is provided. b. This area has the highest concentration of mobile homes in the annexa- tion area - approximately 40. King County allows mobile homes to be used as a dwelling unit on individual lots. They define mobile homes as factory - assembled structures with the necessary service connections, to be readily movable and to be used as a dwelling unit. c. Tukwila distinguishes between single - family dwelling units and mobile home dwellings and then only permits single- family dwellings within its zoning districts on individual lots. Mobile home parks are allowed however with an unclassified use permit in any zone. d. Several King County M -P, Industrial Park, districts are located in this sub -area. Union Tank Works is located in the heart of a residential district. METRO, besides its storage, maintenance and training, over- hauls it buses along East Marginal Way. The small parcel west of East Marginal Way and South of the Duwamish River has an Industrial rather than a Light Industrial Comprehensive Land Use designation. The compar- able Tukwila C -M zone would not be sufficient in use or in standards for the above uses. M -2 is the proposed classification where there is a use inconsistency and M -1 to allow more comparable standards. e. The carpet retail store is a permitted use in the County's B -N, Neigh- borhood Business, zone but is not a permitted use in Tukwila's. A Regional Retail classification (C -2) is therefore proposed. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council CONCLUSIONS VAR .,. e,.o.oalsevr .Rw,e v. .,ras mom- tk simi.mr,S, ,:sx 1m=M"v.:.tH1T MTZ, I C; 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 10 f. Several nonconforming uses will continue to exist along the edges of Allentown /Duwamish such as City Junk, a recycler of aluminum and copper. 1. With the exceptions noted in the Findings section, the proposed zones are comparable to Tukwila classifications. 2. In order to mitigate the impact of the difference between the parallel zones, zoning code amendments are proposed and discussed in the following section. 3. The zoning classification exceptions noted in Findings reflect the recom- mended Comprehensive Plan for the area and are proposed to accommodate the existing uses. STAFF REPORT to Planning 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Commission /City Council 88 -1 -CA: ZONING CODE AMENDMENTS .Y..m vsrohr.rlLmFC.�zRt wT.VOrAr:M1 ,Nt O.TF .: :”., 1 Page 11 1. Tukwila zones do not duplicate King County zones. Amendments to the Tukwila zoning code will be necessary to provide a greater degree of compatibility. 2. The proposed amendments would be approved through an ordinance that would be effective on annexation of the area to Tukwila. Consideration is given in each analysis to the City -wide impact of amendments to the Zoning Code. 3. An individual representing several property owners has commented that the difference in landscaping standard between the M -2 and M -H classifications is important to future development and use of their property. Tukwila requires 15 feet and King County requires 8 feet with administrative ability under limited conditions to reduce it to 4 feet. Planning staff has not recommended any changes because it is not considered to be as limiting to development as is believed. The 15 feet can be split between the adjacent right -of -way and the building (e.g., 8 feet between sidewalk and parking and 7 feet in front of building). STEEL MANUFACTURING Existing Tukwila The M -2 zone permits manufacturing and processing of previously manufactured metal, steel fabrication, stamping, dying, shearing or punching of metal, etc. A conditional use permit is required, however, for metal processing which includes smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging, or drop hammering. Proposed Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.42.020 to read: "(4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dying, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufactur- ing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws." Discussion This amendment excludes processing of raw ore, usually associated with blast furnaces and smelting, but includes current techniques for reprocessing and remanufacturing of steel ingots. Those current techniques now occur in Sub -Area 1 and cause less noise and vibration than the excluded uses. I tiVai1' :`..iiky li L.' >:eliFi w.:s..utti wwn r. w....vn STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council TRANSIT OPERATING BASE Existing The METRO south operating base is also used as a training facility. The code does not mention "training ". Proposal Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.42.030 to read: Discussion The existing code does not directly address all facets of METRO's use. The operation resembles the permitted and accessory uses associated with truck terminals and manufacturing of heavy transportation equipment, which are both permitted. Assembling, servicing, repairing, storage and offices are all allowed as permitted or accessory uses. Training of drivers appears to be accessory to those activities. TRUCK TERMINALS ....,.._.___ -_.___ .. ._.__ . ............... ...... .......................,..., y.,.....,.,., on.........,..... .......a- RV.7r�,,;•s:ru3tit :r 1i eN- WMP OZt Vrer£::Xit4r,iMr:t ... 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 12 "18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982)." Existing Tukwila Truck terminals are conditional uses in C -M, M -1 and M -2 zones. A truck terminal is interpreted to be a site, building and /or tenant space within a building in which a motor carrier transloads, consolidates or transships goods and /or materials not owned by the carrier. Proposed Amend (shown in bold print) the M -2 Heavy Industry classification, TMC 18.42.020, Principally Permitted Uses, by adding "(7) Truck Terminals" and deleting it from TMC 18.42.040(4), M -2 Conditional Uses. 18.42.040 Conditional Uses (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; Discussion Many businesses operate truck terminals in the annexation area. These terminals include large numbers of truck trips, large paved sites for stor- age, maintenance and servicing, and storage /warehousing of goods. The M -2 districts in the annexation area as well as the one existing M -2 district within the City are isolated and away from residential areas except for the Burlington Northern Hub Center in Allentown. The impacts of noise, STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council aesthetics, and truck congestion on roads are similar to other M -2 uses such as manufacturing, processing, and assembling heavy transportation vehicles and equipment. The use also fits within the purpose section of the M -2 district. HEIGHT EXCEPTION AREA 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 13 Existing Tukwila The Tukwila Zoning code, page 290, maps areas of the City where buildings may exceed the height limits of the underlying zone. Otherwise, all three industrial zones are limited to 45 feet. Proposed Amend Map 2 (page 290) to show the annexation area and designated the area north of the Duwamish River and Proverty Hill and the area bounded by SR -99, SR -599, the Duwamish River, and East Marginal Way for heights up to 115 feet. Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.50.030, Building Height, up to 115 feet permitted outright. 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Inter- state 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as shown on Map 2. (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982)." Discussion The difference between King County and Tukwila is the height allowance above 45 feet in the County's industrial districts. Therefore a height exception area is proposed for the M -2 district in Sub -Area 1 and extending south to SR -599 (see Attachment M). The Rainier Bank Center located on East Marginal Way at South 124th Street would object to not being included in the exception area. The height excep- tion area is not extended into this area because of the Riverton low - density residential areas located adjacent to their site. An alternative approach, which is inconsistent with the Zoning Code's approach to height restrictions, would be to amend the table on page 289 to exactly reflect the King County standard and allow one foot of increase in height for every one foot increase in setback. Existing King County King County regulates heights around its two major airports through an air- space plan map specifying height limits for structures (21.48.040). Boeing STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council MOBILE HOMES . r..N+ervhr_•w•r. 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 14 Field height limits in the subject area vary from the surface up to 167 feet. Proposed Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.50, Height, Setback and Area Regulations, by adding 18.50.045. 18.50.045 Height Regulations Around Major Airports. For the purpose of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council subject to the provisions of Chapters 18.81 and 18.92. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provisions of this section, the county adopts the following airport height map(s): A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Discussion A large portion of the annexation area lies under Boeing Field's approach and departure paths. Regardless of final height limits, the City cannot allow construction to interfere with safe flight paths into Boeing Field. Therefore, adoption is proposed of the Boeing Field Airspace Plan, duplicat- ing current King County standards and procedures. Existing Tukwila The Tukwila Zoning Code, Section 18.12.030 - Principally Permitted Uses, permits "one single - family dwelling unit per lot ". The definition section of the Code, TMC 18.06.240, defines a single - family dwelling as a "detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile home, designed for and occu- pied by one family only." Therefore, mobile homes are only allowed in trailer courts (TMC 18.06.840) through an unclassified use permit, not on individual lots. A grandfathered mobile home located in a residential zone prior to annexing could not be replaced with another mobile home unless the grandfathered unit STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council • .n ...., m ....... :rne�:•.r...:.+ raft .....� 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 15 was destroyed by fire or natural disaster per the nonconforming structure section of the Code. Replacement under these limited circumstances can only be done using a unit of the original dimensions and which does not increase the level of nonconformity in terms of setback and height. Grandfathered mobile homes may be relocated on the same parcel as long as minimum setbacks are maintained. The distinction between the County and the City code is significant because Tukwila excludes a form of low -cost single - family home ownership which is heavily used in Sub -Area 4. In 1976 the Federal Government (HUD) created standards and inspections to regulate manufactured homes. The factory -built housing market has in essence three types of products: a. Mobile homes - which identifies manufactured homes built before enact- ment of the HUD code. This type is not longer built but exists in the used sales market. b. Manufactured homes - built in compliance with the HUD code. c. Modular homes - factory -built to meet local building codes. Proposed Tukwila Change the nonconforming section of the Zoning Code to allow HUD - approved manufactured homes to replace existing mobile homes or existing manufactured homes subject to the standards of the R -1 zone. This would allow existing factory -built dwelling units to continue and /or upgrade to current manufac- tured home standards. The disadvantage of this approach is for those who may have purchased property in the area with expectations of using a HUD Code or mobile home on the site. Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.70 - Nonconforming Lots, Structures and Uses, by adding a section: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre- existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD - approved manufactured home and must also meet the following stan- dards: a. Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corru- gated fiberglass or metal roof. b. Shall have a minimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. c. Shall be installed on a foundation system in compliance with all applicable requirements of the Uniform Building Code to the satis- faction of the building inspector. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council Revise 18.06.220 Dwelling, Mobile Home. 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a de- tached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling com- plete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or perman- ent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or a modular home is not considered a mobile home. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982). 18.06.240 Dwelling, single - family. "Single- family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is con- sidered to be a single - family dwelling. Add: d. Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance includ- ing, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. e. Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 16 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufactur- ing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manu- factured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. Alternatives 1. Create a new zone, such as RX -1, for the annexation area, which would permit mobile and manufactured (HUD code) homes or just manufactured (HUD code) homes. The purpose of the zone would be to create a King County - comparable single - family zone for areas annexing to the City. The disadvantage of this approach is the confusion and possible question of equity between R -1 which is single - family with no HUD Code or mobile homes permitted and an RX -1 single - family zone where HUD Code homes are permitted. 2. Amend Tukwi l a' s definitions and R -1 zone to permit manufactured (HUD Code) homes. The City currently allows modular homes, factory -built homes which comply with the local building code. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 17 Discussion The purpose of any of the above three alternatives is to allow a wider range of housing opportunities, an objective of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and to mitigate the impact on the residents and property owners of annexing areas. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan has several objectives and policies which would encourage a change in the current code. "Assure a diversified supply of housing in the Planning Area." (Obj 1, page 51) "Develop guidelines within the Building Code which seek to make pre- fabricated dwellings more substantial and permanent and recognize these dwelling units as a suitable housing alternative." (Policy 3, page 52) "Encourage the development of suitable low- income housing for the elderly." (Policy 2, page 54) The appearance of some homes, especially pre -HUD Code units, are chiefly responsible for the negative image of manufactured homes. Certain design standards can be required that would make a HUD Code home more compatible with traditional residential construction. Wood or non - reflective nonmetallic siding, minimum pitch roof and material and permanent perimeter foundation with a floor elevation compatible with surrounding dwelling units. These conditions, however, will make the original low cost of HUD Code homes somewhat higher. A primary goal of the HUD Code is to improve the quality and the durability of manufactured homes. Because of its fairly recent inception, it has not had the opportunity to prove the test of time. There is a perceived transi- ence associated with mobile homes. Mobile homes have historically come with a hitch and wheels allowing movement from one area to another. Manufactured homes are still transported to their sites on their own set of wheels, which are then usually removed when placed on the lot. The low cost of these homes also provides interim uses for neighborhoods in transition. Sometimes a property owner looking for a return on his property but who does not want to make a substantial investment in a conventional home in an unstable resi- dential area invests in a mobile home. An individual who buys a convention- al house is usually making a long -term commitment in the neighborhood as well as in the dwelling unit. There is no neighborhood in the annexation area or in the City where the zoning does not reflect the long -range com- prehensive plan. The exception is one block fronting on 44th Place South and backing up to the Hub Center. This one area of disparity between Comprehensive Plan and Zoning is the only area where the City has indicated a transition of land use. In contrast to the individual who purchases a home for its mobility and short -term concerns is the individual who wants to own an individual dwell- ing unit yet is constrained by the cost of conventional home ownership. For these individuals, the manufactured home is their best and only option for home ownership. Their commitment to a location and their unit is as permanent as their neighbor who lives in a conventional home. STAFF REPORT to Planning Commission /City Council ] 88 -1 -CPA, 88 -1 -R, 88 -1 -CA Page 18 The priority of the majority of cities is their residential neighborhoods. There is a desire for quality, pleasant residential neighborhoods, which seem to improve with age, the finer the design and maintenance of their structures and landscaping. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENT Chapter 9 of the Tukwila Shoreline Master Program mandates that the Planning Commission review its program every three years and submit any amendments to the City Council and Department of Ecology. The Shoreline program was last updated and partially incorporated into the adoption of the 1982 Zoning Code. The Washington Administrative Code, WAC 173 -19 -044, discusses the effects of annexation and allows compliance with the pre- existing master program (King County) for the area until a new amended program is adopted by the local government assuming authority. A shoreline amendment is not included at this time with the multiple other issues being reviewed in the proposed annexation. Because annexing shorelines will be protected and developable through WAC 173 -19 -044, a comprehensive update of the City's Shoreline Program should be scheduled for the spring of 1989, at which time, if the annexation has occurred, new maps of the City's shoreline will have been prepared and adequate review can be given. (22/88- 1- CPA10 >18) arratxtiSra ATTACHMENT G 8002210461 1 908 March 9, 1988 Dear Brice: C. City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Mr. Brice Martin Executive Secretary King County Review Board 3600 136th Place S.E. Bellevue, Wa 98006 SUBJECT: Proposed Fire District No. 1 Annexation to Tukwila BRB File No. 1450p The City of Tukwila received a copy of the letter dated February 16, 1988 from the King County Division of Roads and Engineering, Department of Public Works. Rex Knight, Manager, requests the Boundary Review Board take jurisdiction and address their concerns regarding to the boundaries of the area. It is our understanding that the Boundary Review Board, upon receipt of such a request must hold a hearing and render their decision within 120 days. The City of Tukwila supports BRB involvement in review of the proposal and requests and agrees to an extension of the 120 day review period. We would like to suggest a June 16th or June 23rd•hearing date, whichever would enable the BRB to render its decision at their regular July meeting. This, of course, optimistically assumes no new information is revealed in the hearing process. We would like to get this issue before the voters by November, 1988. Mike Silver, Superintendent of the South Central School District has recommended the cafeteria of Foster High School as a potential hearing place. Experience in recent area annexation indicate a potential for 100 people; doubling this figure would provide a safe margin. Thank you for your consideration. If we can be of any further assistance, please contact me at 433 -1848. Yours truly Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner MCB /jj Ft!:. M1,1'['Cri:i7P.V4Y,'J3'"',:t TUKWILA COUNCIL FOR THE ANNEXATION, If information requested does not came forth i time for evaluation, I will actively campaign against the annexation. Concerned, /4e> w - ems. I get the impression the City of Tukwila wants to upgrade areas with the annexation. This is a great concern of mine since I own a home in Allentown. There is talk of widening streets, underground wiring, sidewalks, street lights, etc.. Before I can make a fair decision, I need to know what each of these improvements will cost me and over what time frame these funds are to be taken from my pocket. With all the research taken so far, it is reasonable to give the residents proper information to make a good decision. Without this information it will be like giving you a blank check to do what you want with my life. As my life stands now, it is stable, comfortable, and quiet. I also have a fair idea what to expect in Allentown. I don't want that disrupted, and without proper financial projection from you -- I will certainly vote "no ". Tukwila has done research on our water district in Allentown and informed us it is definitely substandard. Not everyone knows this. After so much research, couldn't you at least inform us as to what is wrong with it, what it will take to upgrade standards, and once again, give a financial projection of repairs? The next subject of great concern for many is the sewer vs. septic tank. I know the Health Dept. is responsible for these types of upgrades. My Question to the City of Tukwila is "Do you have a desire for this upgrade ?" If so, I feel you can make a simple phone call to the Health Dept. to start an investigation on our septic tanks and upset our quiet life. At the mention of possible assistance for low income my questions are: What are the boundries of low income, what are the variables that constitute low income, who decides who is low income, and what can we do to change these factors? It is impor- tant that you give the people these answers. The most important thing for Tukwila to remember is the fact that several people I have talked to likes Allentown "the way it is ". I bought my house in Allentown because it was so layed -back, quiet, and forgotten. It is a special community and attracts special people. If I wanted to live in organized Tukwila, I would have moved there instead. I have talked to so many people who live here or simply visited Allentown and they are attracted to Allentowns atmosphere. Many don't want it changed. / /f'c)/ /D /ic)-e 5 5 e l.,6-- Cj c-- Mr. Milan Dukich 5001 South 114th Street Seattle, WA 98178 Dear Mr. Dukich: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 City Council 433-1e00 February 29, 1988 Thank you for your letter to the City Council and Planning Department dated December 17, 1987, regarding the possible annexation of your area to Tukwila. We received your letter only this week, so I hope we're responding in a timely manner. In response to your question of whether or not your area will be included in the annexation area, I can tell you two things: first, you are in the current annexation petition request and, second, where to draw boundary lines will ultimately be the Boundary Review Board's (BRB's) decision to make. Although the Tukwila City Council can make a recommendation to the BRB, other groups and individuals such as yourself can also make comments to the BRB, who will con- sider those and several other factors such as logical geographic or service area lines. The BRB will make the final decision on your annexation boundaries sometime in June. The City Council received the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the annexation this month. Thus far, we have not had any discussions about the boundaries. We won't take any formal action before we have a public hearing in May and we'll be sure to notify you of that hearing. The BRB hearing is not yet scheduled but we'll try to notify you of that meeting, and if you want to check for yourself in May, their number is 296 -7096. We will take your comments into account. It's encouraging to hear that you'd like to annex to Tukwila. If you could have listened to our City Council dis- cussions over the past several years, you would realize how we are looking forward to population increases. There's no tax base we could annex that could match our current base; we need people more than money. With a bigger City we can have a voice in regional politics, on the METRO board, in King County, at the Puget Sound Council of Governments, and at the State level. Finally, I am endlosing a comparisons sheet of taxes for King County Fire Dis- trict No. 1 residents and Tukwila residents. As you can see, your taxes will actually go down, not up, if you annex. Tukwila's taxes have historically been lower than those of our neighbors, including King County. Mr. Milan Dukich February 29, 1988 Page 2 Thank you for writing. Your letter has been given to all our Councilmembers and will be considered when we discuss the annexation. I hope we'll see you at the public hearings that will be held this spring. MH /sjn enclosure Sincerely, 1 Mae Harris, President Tukwila City Council • I, JOANNE JOHNSON O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project FIRE DIST #1 ANNEXATION 1)14_ Signature File Number 87-1 —A ..v:.a&Pr alwro vvtst wet. Kroaa:a alrur. amrxwarvtkrfirs' .2c41 TNENgini!rantM?8E',fi'.} 'K.titt raa': ?g.v » " l A FC DAVIT OF D ISTR`L.3UT I 0 N hereby declare that: [� Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [[ Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action E1 Official Notice O Notice of Application for [ J Other Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit ([X Other FIRE DIST. #1 ANNEXATION DEIS COMMENT PERIOD NOTIFICATION was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 1988 , 19 TO: FROM: DATE: LRB /sjn City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (208) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM All Interested Parties L. Rick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official February 23, 1988 SUBJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. STATEMENT (DEIS) FOR ANNEXATION OF KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TO TUKWILA - DEADLINE FOR COMMENTS - MARCH 7, 1988 ..: ....�, .,., cr.r,: r::.._.__... ��`:t• 4:! A..'.;` f: 1; �Sr' i�,.,.,.,_,a..,...zaCw;z;�:t�a: rye`. i?:. a7v !`i0,it�'= :�7„'t3:rS:?a1'�n CS: i, 2St' i' c' ' t1ti.:9fi1t " .^�is ' {:..4s;;i�L;�i `.. This is a follow -up to the memo notifying you of the availability of the above. The DEIS document can be reviewed at the Tukwila Library located at 14475 - 59th Avenue South. Please call them at 244 -5140 for their hours. Copies may also be reviewed or purchased at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington. The cost of the document is $10.00. If you have any questions, please call Moira Carr Bradshaw at 433 -1848. Please send all written comments by March 7, 1988 to Moira Carr Bradshaw, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. Upon completion of the environmental review process, the City will hold a series of public hearings to consider pre- annexation Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code amendments for the area. You will continue to be notified of the future hearing dates. : �! / 19011 City: of Tukwila PMNNING DEPARTMENT 6200SouthcenterBoubvard TukwUa, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 ➢.ta+x Y.C:fljAVA i OrilNA/E Le4.Xl,:X'sr PAckua* .¢.ur:alit.V= IOWW,I vu011,m4mviks evm4ekzuatz.r s:•k:1_ry City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 IZ06) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MCB/ s j n enclosure Annexation Task Force Moira Carr Bradshaw February 22, 1988 DEIS COMMENT LETTER MEMORANDUM Enclosed is a draft letter commenting on the Fire District No. 1 Annexation Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The comments were raised by the members who attended the task force meeting on the 16th of February. Dan Wolf, Chairman for the Task Force, will sign the letter for the group after I have included your comments. Feel free to add any additional items. If you hnave any sug- gested changes, please return them to me by the 3rd of March. Ross Earnst, City Engineer, attended the meeting of the 16th to discuss the potential Tukwila stormwater program. The City Public Works Department is preparing a scope of work for a consultant study to research the establishment of a system and its implementation. He thought the soonest possible timeline would be public hearings before the City Council in the winter of 1988 -89 and 'implementation in spring 1989. No suggestion of fees could be made as it is still early. Finally, the next effort of the task force will be to review the report on Com- prehensive Plan, Zoning Map and Zoning Code amendments. When you each receive a copy of the report, a meeting date will be scheduled to discuss Task Force recommendations. Expect the next transmittal mid - March. :N:A' 011. 3 M. , 6100VJAwsutst ed.ar onsa6c.ouloi: Axvu Mr. Jon Nichols Rhone Poulence Post Office 80963 9229 E. Marginal Way S. Seattle, WA 98108 Dear Jon: MCB /sjn cc: Annexation Task Force ' ∎11,11,n.' ...bvawx v..v.r a.a...*swegw I �. City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 January 20, 1988 The tour you arranged at your plant for the Annexation Task Force and the staff of Tukwila's Planning Department was very successful. All three members of the Rhone Poulence staff - Nancy, Therese and Bill - were personable and thoughtful. Therese and Bill were excellent and discerning guides who helped translate the chemical processes into layman terms. The plant was impressively clean, safe, secure and efficient. Please pass on the group's thanks to our guides. It was a unique experi- ence and a valuable opportunity for which I would like to thank you for organizing. Yours truly, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner sit'A; Mr. Ron Altier Jorgensen Steel Post Office Box 24026 Seattle, WA 98124 Dear Ron: . mog City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 January 20, 1988 On behalf of the staff of Tukwila's Planning Department and members of the Task Force in attendance, I would like to thank you for the excellent tour of your facility and steel manufacturing operation. It was fascinating, educational and fun. Your knowledge of Jorgensen and its business was obvious and valu- able. Your patience with all our questions and your attentive attitude to the group's interest was appreciated. Thank you for the rare opportunity and your guidance through your exceptional plant. MCB /sjn cc: Annexation Task Force Yours truly, /(6a.Z Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner i; : :;;A;yx'':ar`? " P}At rItt031 .:Y¢w:!t- :rrivx.arrnawv ^asue KErir xi VCPWIL SCTLVNs cm .n;.IWyiV!IM9Reni4sW=; a. ' igti: :, ro;: vi": �:1.:. �..e. _...f :rim e;r:.n;:• •:+w: \ ^::.:. �..y!�au�ssi.::frr.rr V.RMVAI. FEB 19 1988 Gi l• s� mac- . ..fie -r ,2) frz eee .... Of/ V � � o anx.���. �5 p �.y � N , ra. e 2:4.1g Earl. Clymer, Mayor February 18, 1988 TO: FROM: SUBJE MEMORANDUM Mayor Clymer Mayor Van Dusen Don Morrison ike Parness ick:` Beeler :.:' arry Springer MEETING REGARDING This will confirm our meeting scheduled for 3:30 p.m., Tuesday, February 23rd, in Mayor Van Dusen's office to discuss the draft Renton /Tukwila Joint Resolution regarding Fire District 1. A copy of the draft resolution is enclosed. Enclosure sGC FIRE DISTRICT 1 200 Mill Avenue South • Renton, Washington 98055 - (206) 235-2552 CITY OF RENTON POLICY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEB 2 21988 ci s' o YUKWiLA PLANN NG DIPT. 1 A CITY OF RENTON - CITY OF TUKWILA JOINT RESOLUTION REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 1 TO TUKWILA Whereas, the City of Tukwila has accepted a petition to annex King County Fire District 1 using the election method and has filed that petition with the Boundary Review Board, and Whereas, King County Fire District 1 includes an area (Attachment A) east of the Burlington Northern Railroad Right of Way, south of State Route 900, and north of the Renton City Limits in the vicinity of the Metro's Renton Sewer Treatment Plant, and Whereas, the Cities of Renton and Tukwila have acknowledged in a prior interlocal agreement (Attachment B) that they will jointly decide on a common boundary between the two cities prior to any future annexations north of Interstate I 405, and Whereas, the Burlington Northern Right of Way is currently the common boundary between the two jurisdictions, and Whereas, the City of. Renton has made a substantial financial commitment to upgrade Oakesdale Avenue S.W. to major arterial standards and expects that this transportation corridor will become an important "gateway" to Renton, and Whereas, it will be prohibitively expensive for the City of Tukwila to provide utility services east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way, and Whereas, the City of Renton currently has both sewer and water utility services in this area, and Whereas, the City of Renton has agreed that they would be willing to provide fire protection services to the residual portion of Fire District 1 as identified in Attachment A on a negotiated contract basis, and Whereas, there is a business, Spider S in the subject area which has been notified by the King County Health District that a health emergency exists due to a failing septic tank system and that connection to a sanitary sewer system is the preferred remedy, and agik l :.' .° 1r�{'Qy"clld AL MVAS ..-501 fiFlbq"'i1fa*.r;lit3 =Ji".R'.4kM.':VAI dGE ra iZ4S' b= .?.� 2fi Ta . . .inr '..t n s ..r�uy - 2 - Whereas, King County and the City of Seattle have expressed some interest in a siting solid waste incinerator at the Black River Rock Quarry located in the subject area, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that: The Cities of Renton and Tukwila acknowledge that the territory east of the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way and north of Interstate I 405 is Renton's potential annexation area and municipal service area, and that both cities intend to testify at the Boundary Review Board public hearing for the Fire District 1 Annexation and request that the BRB delete the subject area from the proposed annexation to Tukwila based on the findings outlined in this resolution. The Cities of Renton and Tukwila agree that they will carefully review and comment on any proposal to locate a solid waste incinerator on the Black River Quarry property, and take action as necessary to ensure that any such proposal, if approved, will not be detrimental to either community. Ai-tatAlwikit W UNRESTRICTED REVENUE: PROPERTY TAX (GENERAL) SALES TAX (NIGN ESTIMATE) SALES TAX (LOW ESTIMATE) BUSINESS LICENSES /PERMITS BUILDING PERMITS NOTOR VENICLE EXCISE TAX (REG) LIQUOR EXCISE TAX LIQUOR BOARD PROFITS COURT FEES 8 FINES, NON-TRAFFIC COURT FEES i FINES, TRAFFIC FALSE ALARMS PLANNING FEES UNRESTRICTED TOTAL (NIGN) UNRESTRICTED TOTAL (LOW) RESTRICTED REVENUE: MOTOR VENICLE FUEL TAX EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES REAL ESTATE EXCISE TAX BLOCK GRANT (1988 ALLOCATION) RESTRICTED TOTAL GRAND TOTAL (NIGN) GRAND TOTAL (LOW) Table 16 CITY OF TUKWILA: ESTIMATED REVENUE IMPACT * CURRENT REVENUE ADDITIONAL REVENUE WITH ANNEXATION (1987 EST.) ALT I ALT I/A ALT II 2,425,500 1,153,500 1,348,000 1,280,000 6,824,000 701,000 701,000 701,000 489,000 489,000 489,000 90,000 11,000 11,000 9,500 70,000 17,500 17,500 14,000 58,000 24,000 24,000 13,000 20,000 6,000 6,000 3,000 30,000 18,500 18,500 10,000 53,000 8,000 8,000 2,500 103,500 51,500 51,500 34,000 12,000 1,500 1,500 500 84,000 4,500 4,500 4,500 1,997,000 2,191,500 2,072,000 1,785,000 1,979,500 1,860,000 65,000 26,000 26,000 70,000 31,000 31,000 70,000 40,000 40,000 29,000 11,500 11,500 234,000 108,500 108,500 85,000 2,105,500 2,300,000 2,157,000 1,893,500 2,088,000 1,945,000 - 111111 M N IINL - explanation based on assessed valuation and current tax rate (52.878) I-based on Department of Revenue estimates and tax rate of .1 percent less the 15 percent share for King County based on number of businesses and employees based on a 20 to 25 Z increase in workload 1-State distributed revenues based on State, formulas a ccounts 341310,356900,357300 increase by crime increase (5 -15%) accounts 350000, 353100 ,353700,354000,355200,355800 increase by 33 to 50 % increase by number of businesses, about 7 to 11 % accounts 345810,345830,345831 increased by 5 X 14,500 increase based on population 27,500 based on KCEMS estimates 36,500 increase based on turnover of about 3.3X of a.v. 6,500 increase based on population * Alternatives I/A and 11 include the Boeing property which is between the Seattle City Limits and the northern boundary of Fire District 11. All revenue estimates have been rounded to the nearest 5500. .R.K.....ri:!n•`.:iG�w \'y: rnvKl Y>Z�'.•.�} . 'ir' vrt:: iii':` �' 1: 2�;: ��. ���i: Jr' isY3+,. S;: iAt': �a:��ne'.!.�ar.�tStw•.•�.�+n�i, ::.L:rtr�iir..+.:d ,.�`,..i��� OTHER FUNDS Street Funds \1 Water \2 Sewer \2 CAPITAL COSTS: FIRST FIVE TRANSPORTATION \3 WATER \2 SEWER \2 PARKS SURFACE WATER TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS Table 17 COST IMPACT ON TUKWILA PLANNING COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY f.t. • yr ."k? ,11, M o'+ S` VG kti ;I7. V xtt rt `. p.L'.N6I° ? ; 7 il Vakr, M tAY f7 z ALT I & I.A. $218,000 $103,000 $103,000 YEAR PHASE $2,135,000 $1,338,000 $1,080,000 $460. X100 $100,000 99 ALT II ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS: GENERAL FUND Police Protection $477,500 $313, Fire Protection $606,500 $606,500 Justice System $44,500 $32,000 Community Services $18,000 $10,000 Parks & Recreation $19,000 $18,000 Library $37,000 $20,000 Planning and Regulation $106,500 $106,500 Legislative and Admin. $60,000 $35,000 Public Works Admin /Engineering $189,000 $161,000 Parks Maintenance $44,000 $44,000 General Fund Total $1,602,000 $1,346,500 $164,000 $103,000 $103,000 $1,880,000 $1,240,000 $1,080,000 $460,000 $100,000 $5,113,000 $4,760,000 1. Surface water maintenance costs are included in the road maintenance amount. 2. Includes only costs of improving sub - standard systems. 3. Does not include $3.3 million bridge project which is King County funding responsibility. impacts on the residents or the City and its existing rate payers could be significant. To mitigate the potential increases in monthly sewer and water charges to residents, the City could reduced rates to low income and senior residents through special credits. The impact of charges for capital improvements could be mitigated by the City paying for sewer and water improvements through general funding sources, rather than assessments or increased rates. Potential increases in service costs to the City could be reduced by generating new revenues or developing alternative financing strategics (e.g. general obligation bonds for capital projects). * Tukwila's population and land area will increase substantially, and the resulting demand for municipal service will have a significant impact on the City's annual operating costs. To offset these costs, the City will gain additional revenues from the added tax base of the annexation area (e.g. property taxes). Net fiscal impacts on Tukwila for each annexation alternative are summarized below. The estimates reflect the impact to the City's general funding sources. For the revenue estimates, the low end of the estimate range is shown. Annual O &M Alternative I (51,820,000) Alternative I.A (51,820,000) Alternative II (51,510,500) 3 Annual Revenues $1,893,500 52,088,000 $ 1,945,000 Net Impact S 73,500 5268,000 5434,500 In addition to the above annual O &M costs, Tukwila will incur capital costs totalling 55,113,000 with A)ternative I and IA and 54,760,000 with Alternative II in the first five years after annexation. Under Alternatives I and IA, 52.7 million of the capital costs are for roads, surface water and park projects; another 52.4 million is for sewer and water projects. Under Alternative II, 52.4 million is for roads, surface water and park projects and 52.3 million is for sewer and water projects. Historically, Tukwila has funded roads, surface water.and park projects through general fund sources and with state and federal funds designated for road projects. If these capital costs were financed through 20 year bonds, the annual debt service would be about 5265,000 for Alternatives I and IA and 5235,000 for Alternative II (assuming an average borrowing rate of 7.5 percent). Based on the estimated revenue surpluses (indicated as the net impacts of the annexation alternatives), it would be feasible to finance, from general fund sources, the roads, surface water and parks capital projects under Alternatives IA and II, but not under Alternative I. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LRB /sjn MEMORANDUM All Interested Parties L. Rick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official February 4, 1988 7 c/e2,6 oto &ceAz_ AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) FOR ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA OF KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Cif This DEIS was prepared pursuant to Chapter 197 -11, Washington Administrative Code, and is being distributed for public review and comment. The key issues of the proposal are the service, fiscal and land use impacts. These impacts affect the residents, property owners, and businesses of the annexation area; the current residents and municipality of Tukwila; selected service purveyor's within the area; and King County, who currently provides the majority of services to the area. Alternative annexation areas were developed by analyzing the results of these service, fiscal and land use impacts along with consideration of natural or manmade boundaries, neighborhoods, irregular boundaries, and affected municipal- ities. A public hearing on the DEIS will be held on Thursday February 18, 1988 in the Council Chamhers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, at 7:00 p.m. Both the oral comments received at the hearing and the written comments received by the end of the comment period will receive a response and be available in the final EIS. Written comments should be mailed to Moira Carr Bradshaw, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Annexation Task Force Moira Carr Bradshaw February 3, 1988 MEMORANDUM TASK FORCE MEETING - TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1988 Enclosed is your copy of the DEIS. It is long, with detailed information on services. The document should address most remaining service questions that you may have. A review of the group's initial list of topics shows that Taxes /Fees /Political Representation still needs to be addressed. I have enclosed a packet of infor- mation on these topics to get the review started. The political make -up of the City of Tukwila is outlined in an enclosed form entitled "Form of Government ". The seven - member Council is established by State statute RCW 35A.12 for a Mayor /Council form of government. 35A. is the chapter for Optional Municipal Code cities and contains the laws by which the City oper- ates. The number of legislators cannot be changed, but the positions are up for re- election on a rotating basis so that either three members and the Mayor's position or four members must be elected every two years. The size and opera- tion of the various boards and commissions is established by their individually adopted rules of procedure and by local ordinance. Also enclosed are forms on taxes and fees. The fees are minimal and are either established by Council resolution or are within appropriate ordinances. Build- ing permit and plan check fees are listed within the Uniform Building Code are are not unique to the City. Unlike the County, Tukwila does not have a cost recovery policy on its permit fees. Enclosed is also a copy of land use fees within the County for comparison. Please review the information and formulate your questions and requests for additional information. On the 9th, we can then coordinate on the topic. MEMORANDUM to: Annexation Task Force MCB/ s j n enclosures '6te4! R 7af1<E:t7 .w51r�L• 'ATM— VAMMMUMMA February 3, 1988 Page 2 The major emphasis of Tuesday's meeting should be an organizational meeting on how you wish to proceed. We are still in the information - gathering stage but we should discuss: 1. If and who will be the group's spokesperson. 2. How you wish to make your recommendations, written or oral and to whom. 3. What recommendations you would like to make. 4. The timeline, which has changed since 1987, leading up to November 8th. 5. The schedule for the ensuing weeks. I look forward to seeing you all and making some progress. . a . /�:' '�'etY .`' rta'. �a- rtciv _,•�+n;.nt.• 'F•U:� aa.�.u.�� ^.;h � 5R.'y.^:.?;yv:N<.F ";)•:.. . Y1:.•., `LY:F.r..^: s King County Division of Roads and Engineering Department of Public Works 956 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344 -7490 February 16, 1988 Mr. G. Brice Martin Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board W -378 Courthouse Dear Mr. Martin: RE: Proposed Annexation to City of Tukwila (Fire District 1) Temporary File 1450 Engineering Services staff have checked the legal description of the attached proposed annexation and request that it be modified. The following are our comments on the segments of the submitted legal description: 1. The language used makes it sound as though the west margin of Airport Way and the city limits of Seattle are one and the same. They are not. The establishment of Tukwila city limits along the west margin of Airport Way South will create a triangular shaped island of County area between Tukwila and the Seattle city limits. (See map number 1.) Engineering staff are opposed to the aspect of continued maintenance of Airport Way lying between the two cities. 2. The east half of 51st Avenue South is presently in the City of Seattle. See RCW 35.02.170. 3. The north half of South 120th Street is presently in the City of Seattle. See RCW 35.02.170. 4. The westerly halves of 68th Avenue South and Beacon Coal Mine Road are in the City of Renton. See RCW 35.02.170. 5. This segment of the legal description is illogical from a Roads maintenance standpoint. The proposed annexation will leave the south abutment of the 42nd Avenue South Bridge and adjoining intersection with Interurban Avenue in the County while all feeder roads will be city streets. The legal description should be revised to include all portions of 42nd Avenue South (including the bridge) and Interurban Avenue as illustrated on map number 2. • 6. It is our contention that the city limits should be established at the thread of the Duwamish River. See RCW 35.21.160. Mr. G. Brice Martin February 16, 1988 Page Two 7. This call represents the only significant variation from the established boundaries of Fire District 1. Resolution 8370 established Fire District l's boundary at this location as the westerly extension of the centerline of Rose Street. By our calculations, Rose Street is approximately 900 feet north of the line cited in the attached legal description. We estimate that about thirty acres of property within Fire District 1 will be excluded from this city annexation as a result. See map number 3. 8. Staff are opposed to the aspect of continued maintenance of East Marginal Way at this location. After this annexation is completed, East Marginal Way will be bounded on the north by the City of Seattle and on the east and south by Tukwila. The legal description should be revised to include all portions of East Marginal Way in this annexation effort. See map number 3. Staff review of this proposed annexation finds that the enclosed legal description does an adequate job of describing the boundaries of Fire District 1. In almost all cases where this legal description varied from the fire district boundary, it was to accommodate right -of -way as required by RCW 35.02.170. Staff agree with those changes. We are requesting the Boundary Review Board to invoke jurisdiction to address our concerns as cited above in items 1 through 8. Most of our concerns are related to rights -of -way and river areas. Only items 1 and 7 will affect private ownerships. We do not pretend to understand the significance of item 7; it appears to be a matter for the discretion of the Boundary Review Board. Please note that there are numerous incidents where tax lots will be split by the proposed boundaries of this annexation. This annexation does not appear to conflict with any other city in the vicinity. Very truly yours, Rex H Knight .E. Manager Engineering Services RHK:JRB:fq Enclosure: Entire file cc: Helene Mociulski, Boundary Review Board Moira Carr Bradshaw,, Associate Planner, City of Tukwila til 1 A` ll I GA) , 1 c • • -.,;:e' 1 1 0.1 - 1 1 1 D- .r.- r 1. 3 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1, 1 1 1 1 1 st.)0 -0571P, SENILE E CITY wr_....1.s.....e I I ' "I., ? V 11 1 I ;3? 1 1 1 \I 11 1 \ I ; 1 ; 1 1 I \ 1 ,sr „—.. : f I XI 1-- ,1 7r;. 41 E) 17 :: -3 \: "6 \-\\ 4 ,4 77 0 4 .4 2 (a\ • - t\N rut %ILA t It ora z7r, - s _ R/1/,- • •Co 1 • . Om • act " " ALAQ v9L . • t -•-?' I -I .- • i . 4 .... • ' 1 :;•- ., . , • . 1:- • .,! ... -,....... .. II .•-, . 1 . i .,:.. ., . 1 c.r) . .J . ) 0.0 I 1 " - - :ufE1i 1 — • -. - v ••._ \ \ • 4 2 N D . N C - (4... - L. 3 , .s c. CD It' NI 3 r-- i 9035 N Nrb ti ia t js tv 1 Co co ' c-c1060-6-33.Cit VO 6g 311- 6b-9 ••• 191; .5 - „ea1.79 • I 'Cllvv ,,1Iv i T DEPT,.. 0" ASSESSMENTS ;tii::vTi c . ;. ;.iy•ta r <! a ,n <.:y7a +,Y/F kS; �yc ;- . C ITl LIM \TS OF SGk?Th -E ( 4 &16E.) .par-- ;:ir;sFK•, :.,;. i I- . 11 , 17 FI .L :fir -1 ( 3 \ lTc<s ti A 121-A- bA 1510 '' FrLS S � tt7 UJ Lu &)END I "41.1 Ey,pr - r103 i/JALIfz.E„D y Ec.c.ew) I 4/0.7r...44+] 4ytCLi ' d in /+r 11 ?,C�`Y!S ` f ' • ' . ..•: tk" NW 33 I fir. ►�*- ? C IT/ 75 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 City Council 433 -1800 Dear Citizen: We've received the petition you signed voicing -your concerns about the potential annex- ation of Fire District #1. By signing the petition, you've expressed your concerns about the future of our community, and we want you to know we share your concern. We all experienced some of the same serious questions and reservations about the annexation of Fire District #1 as stated in your petition. Therefore, we spent a great deal of time working on annexation issues and delivering information to the people in the annexation areas. However, upon reflection, we admit we inadvertently overlooked the importance of keeping our current residents fully informed. We sincerely apologize for that oversight. We hope you'll please take a few moments to read the enclosed fact sheet which is designed to answer the major questions concerning annexations. One of our top priorities as citizens and councilmembers is to maintain the high quality of services we've all come to appreciate. One of the concerns expressed in the petition was whether Fire District #1 will add increased costs to the city. We commissioned a study called an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to determine the costs and benefits of the annexation. The EIS Financial Analysis indicated that even after projected expenditures for services, Fire District #1 will actually have a surplus. If the area is annexed, F.D. #1 will turn over to Tukwila their physical assets and approximately $500,000 from their reserve account. We hope you find this information useful. If you have any other questions or comments, we invite you to share them with us at any City Council meeting or call us at home. We truly value your input and we hope you'll feel free to talk with us on this or any other issue. Sincerely, TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS M24 Lititli Maril yn St al[nes Council President 7235 J 2 -4280 • ii) a 4/ Edgar . Bauch 24 Mabel J. 2 -4.59 Clarence B. Moriwaki 433-8539 ANNEXATION FACT SHEET What annexations are now being considered? Four annexations are pending. Fire District #1 will vote on their annexation February 7, Foster, Riverton and Thorndyke are three separate annexations to the west which will be voted on March 14. If all four annexations are approved, these annexations would add about 8,500 residents and $550 million in assessed valuation to the City, How were these annexations started and approved? Citizens in the annexation areas petitioned the City for annexation. After carefully considering studies of the annexation areas, the City Council voted to approve them. The next step will be for all voters who live in the annexation areas to vote whether or not they want to annex. The City Council will then take a final vote to accept or deny the annexations. Why is the City considering approving these annexations? In 1978 Tukwila adopted Its first annexation policy. That policy was reaffirmed and updated in our current policy which was adopted in 1986. It is easiest to remain content with what we have and to resist change and growth. However, unless we're receptive to growth now we may lose the chance to have an Impact on those adjoining areas that affect the quality of life in our City. For this and the reasons listed below we support annexations such as Fire District #1, Foster, Riverton and Thorndyke. We feel the City needs to: 1, Increase our population to gain leverage in such regional issues as who benefits from a County -wide bond Issue, where unwanted public facilities are located, and which communities get transportation funding priorities. 2. Control rather than be controlled by the growth and development of high density multi- family units and of adult entertainment businesses in the annexation areas. 3. Diversify our economic base in order to reduce our dependence on one major source of revenue. 4. Receive a more equitable return on federal, state and local grants and funds which are collected by assessed valuation and allocated by population. 5. Control law enforcement problems such as prostitution and drug abuse on our borders. 6. Allow the City to control growth within our current planning area so that the effects of uncontrolled growth do not spill over into our City. 7, Respond to King County's policy of encouraging urban areas to annex to existing cities or to incorporate. How can 1 comment on these annexations? ANNEXATION FACT SHEET Page 2 8. Contain the entire South Central School District within the boundaries of our City so that the majority of our children can attend all thirteen years of primary schooling within the City. Why wasn't 1 given an opportunity to voice my opinion on annexation? By accepting the annexation petition from citizens of Fire District #1, the Tukwila City Council adopted the same process taken In past annexation procedures. The City Council held numerous public hearings encouraging public testimony. Many local newspaper articles have kept the public informed about the annexation process. Ample opportunity is provided at each Council meeting for Citizen Comments, and all Council minutes are made available to citizens for their information. Finally, at an open house at Tukwila City Hall last March, citizens were invited to express their opinions on' annexation and other Issues. What will happen to my level of service upon annexation? Keeping your current service levels Is a high priority with the City. Tukwila takes pride in the services we offer, and our goal is to keep our current high standards for service. We are already working toward ensuring we keep our excellent police and fire emergency response times at their current levels. Will my taxes Increase? The City Council carefully considered the costs and benefits of the annexations with financial analyses before they voted to accept them. Fire District #1 will turn over to the City approximately one -half million dollars they have built up in their reserve account. It's impossible to say we'll never raise taxes, but your taxes will not go up as a result of these annexations. What about the 16th Avenue Bridge in Fire District #1? Although it was not our decision, the King County Review Board set the Fire District #1 boundary at the thread of the river up to and Including the 16th Avenue Bridge. Operations and capital Improvements to the bridge will become a shared responsibility between King County and the City. If the bridge is replaced not only will Tukwila and King County contribute to the cost, but the State Department of Transportation, City of Seattle and adjoining businesses will all be a part of the eventual solution to the funding Issue. Council Member's phone numbers are listed on the accompanying letter. Local newspapers like the Community Voice, South Seattle Times and Valley Daily New generally carry news about annexations and other City Issues. By being aware, taking an Interest and communicating with the Mayor and City Council your viewpoints will be represented) City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: All Interested Parties FROM: L. Rick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official DATE: February 4, 1988 SUBJECT: AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) FOR ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA OF KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This DEIS was prepared pursuant to Chapter 197 -11, Washington Administrative Code, and is being distributed for public review and comment. The key issues of the proposal are the service, fiscal and land use impacts. These impacts affect the residents, property owners, and businesses of the annexation area; the current residents and municipality of Tukwila; selected service purveyor's within the area; and King County, who currently provides the majority of services to the area. Alternative annexation areas were developed by analyzing the results of these service, fiscal and land use impacts along with consideration of natural or manmade boundaries, neighborhoods, irregular boundaries, and affected municipal- ities. A public hearing on the DEIS will be held on Thursday February 18, 1988 in the Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, at 7:00 p.m. Both the oral comments received at the hearing and the written comments received by the end of the comment period will receive a response and be available in the final EIS. Written comments should be mailed to Moira Carr Bradshaw, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. LRB /sjn G 2e- c- O y �6t Y i'L'• ;. '- 1'988 0.34 zieeL.-o H. H. Heerschap 831 Place Road Port Annalac WA 'uric, 4kagg:li 'i4i::lf.'.,6041 ';�`ii' +.ti4`a VA:MgaG,i:s?iri:. V. _:5 ; s:c W 6'S:.^.=Ati:A I, JOANNE JOHNSON [( Notice of Public Hearing • Notice of Public Meeting Q Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [l Planning Commission Agenda Packet [( Short Subdivision Agenda Packet ,.- .«- tvxx -wzi :" x, ^o^' *. , ` "l'if't. n'Gf'C 7F .r i.Y',r�i' .�J:N t . J+ .. ��'1.. ,. ... .�. rt ... ...a,t,��.a��i ....r r'�V ^,_.Z.� uA.J��k... � \�v�i.. _W.�..r....r'..D ':. 4n`..�. .. ,. ... ?� a 'k � AFFLDAVIT OF DISTRWidUTION hereby declare that: [[ Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [] Notice of Action O Official Notice [[ Notice of Application for Other Shoreline Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit ni Other DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT was mailed to each of the following addresses on WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1988, 19 (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to intersted parties) Name of Project FIRE DIST. #1 ANNEXATION File Number 87 -1 —A I, JOANNE JOHNSON `a' :: y i i:fctt fir,!: " . 4 1.In . r :atctie * `r:: g n r r ry . ,,.;L x t c ru;�t L • 3 s+eaciw �. '�..s','�.r.L,�3. G_J� zi. :7rx�„ ....l...+. .I a <`4L:�'a..:6 s.�u.Y "C3:G_.?.'"i:t M s+++ ai+ awtn. rA±^ r^ f. �Li- *i_".'.x.4:;+: ?.:1'r7:,P,'. b£ <x45 e1' .".F;� �.rr.Lk stn' ��ri�L "�n..�`��3"a J Notice of Public Hearing j Notice of Public Meeting E[ Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet O Board of Appeals Agenda Packet (J Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Q Notice of Application for 0 Other AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT ETS Shoreline Management Permit [[ Shoreline Management Permit 0 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on FFRRIIARY 3, MR , 19 ENTIRE MAILING LIST (1000 - APPROXIMATELY) Name of Project FIRE D1ST #1 ANNEX DEIS File Number 87 - — A F F I D A V I T OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: (] Determination of Nonsignificance El Mitigated Determination of Non - significance [� Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice [� Notice of Action (J Official Notice FIRE DIST. #1 ANNEXATION City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LRB /sjn MEMORANDUM All Interested Parties L. Rick Beeler, SEPA Responsible Official February 4, 1988 AVAILABILITY OF DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DEIS) FOR ANNEXATION TO TUKWILA OF KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This DEIS was prepared pursuant to Chapter 197 -11, Washington Administrative Code, and is being distributed for public review and comment. The key issues of the proposal are the service, fiscal and land use impacts. These impacts affect the residents, property owners, and businesses of the annexation area; the current residents and municipality of Tukwila; selected service purveyor's within the area; and King County, who currently provides the majority of services to the area. Alternative annexation areas were developed by analyzing the results of these service, fiscal and land use impacts along with consideration of natural or manmade boundaries, neighborhoods, irregular boundaries, and affected municipal- ities. A public hearing on the DEIS will be held on Thursday February 18, 1988 in the Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, at 7:00 p.m. Both the oral comments received at the hearing and the written comments received by the end of the comment period will receive a response and be available in the final EIS. Written comments should be mailed to Moira Carr Bradshaw, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. K'� ;; �r� V W i.,•.�y., l �.,;tr., , g n, .cs ., RE �.rt r P L`:rstVI �zaui ,''t , �. �'' • i: �ry `� .{4. y�,5 ;,.:a : t5::: '�:+ "Cr a7"'f: rru�A. ;'d:, Y. � y�,, <rf, -�.ry1 ..GY."�., . .�`^�`�..t�,t`;'�1�,,.. ..�r5 4�!:}a.. .: �dS.. �? Tr2' V���u. �k. �' i1. 71�... r�21? J�o' �: i3r. �t� ['.dY:c= 2r��,u1`'..�3�.fr�"2., e: ��: 3`< �3r' �'..-',' �fZ S:. m. i�. v> �] S�. �iF�" 1':; � ..,.,w�t.',.IEae.�...,.�..A::. k,..,...,.:. rx�+ Y+ tltt. �4�..?�ft7?.c....J3....r°.5r:�: h.. R.: f.. rr.....N�,..•4':.,..1?,::J.7:�. `.�5.., ��:�. Ms. Helene Mociulski Room 402 King County Courthouse Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TUKWILA (KCFD #1) Dear Ms. Mociulski: Attached is a revised legal description for the subject site. We have revised it per the King County Public Works letter dated April 7, 1987. There are some outstanding issues on the legal which our City Attorney has advised can at this point only be amended by the Boundary Review Board or by the affected property owners. We have notified property owners but may not be successful is receiving responses. The issue is ongoing and you will be advised when any changes are made. MCB /sjn attachment cc: Brice Martin City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 January 13, 1988 Sincerely, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner ,7� 7f:.. .. 'Sk .... Mr. Rex H. Knight, P.E. Manager, Engineering Services King County Public Works 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 - 4th Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 Cit of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Subject: PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO. 1450P Dear Mr. Knight: January 12, 1988 Attached is a revised perimeter legal description of King County Fire District No. 1. It has been amended to include or exclude roads except where a boundary currently defines a City limit. Our City Attorney has advised me that we may not include or exclude properties, even if the proposed line bisects buildings or creates islands. The problem areas have been identified and w i l l be brought to the Boundary Review Board's attention with recommendations for corrections. We have been contacting prop- erty owners to elicit their preference and asking for additional annexation petitions if necessary. We would like to know the County's preference regarding water bodies. The majority of the legal refers to the thread of the Duwamish River, however, in Section 10, "the east line of the Duwamish" is used. I am sorry you had to spend the time on the initial review but we appreciated your comments. We do not usually have an opportunity to comment on the legals before they are circulated with petitions and accept them if the signatures are sufficient. I presume the people who circulated the petition assumed that the legal description for the Fire District was an adequate document. Thank you again for your time and efforts. I look forward to your comments; please call me at 433 -1848 if you have some suggestions. Sincerely, /0: -1.42 1 Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner MCB /sjn attachment cc: Brice Martin i'�i r , • . '^ :Ai �i :'S "3i :.F r.'.t`iJ ".. ` „ 'w' S i:i�t� . 3t��ti�JSF?ii`�:i December 17, 1987 Tukwila City Counsel Planning Department Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Attention: Jack Pace Dear Mr. Pace: • �” I�t�^' umiLKi' rT: l: rty��rrr�c :•.M..S" ?L:'tmsa✓.r "'..C.:Y.ui: TT Milan[ k dtil a im 5 01 .S': 1. 5il S attle,, 9817;8 T 1 - t f7�2�8 -:c1 �a'80 '? ' r:n�lwrv�aCS,rn^.rKJ:JIiM..:mr.A .: .r4'S•. A1:1 35'.eli,';t? ry i Re: Proposed annexation of unincorporated areas of King County, including Rainier View I am a third - generation resident of Rainier View, that area surrounded on three sides by Seattle, in the middle east portion of the proposed annexation. I write to request that the Tukwila City Counsel confirm, in writing, that Rainier View will be included in the areas of annexation that are next proposed to the King County Boundary Review Board. I along with my neighbor, John Merriam, were present at the meeting held at the Duwamish fire station. I also attended the meeting the following evening at the Rainier View Community Club. I spoke to you briefly. Although we have no formal organization in place, I speak for my neighbors, and for a vast majority of residents in Rainier View: We want to be part of Tukwila. After attending the meeting I, along with Mr. Merriam and his partner William Mackay, became concerned that Tukwila is motivated more by concerns of expanding tax base, rather than the stated motive of expanding population. Since Rainier View is zoned almost entirely as single family residential, we are quite concerned that our neighborhood will be excised from the final proposal submitted by the city of Tukwila to the King County Boundary Review Board. If that is to happen, we want advance notice, in writing, that we are not to be included in such a proposal, prior to the time the City of Tukwila submits its proposal to the county. ;t klAY�Y.e�t:"1: «��<;�.....'z , nt: �'. s:i.im;:7:..,.. ^!nrr.tY. ^�t'7:. '�ti: ;...,... �f ;' t.% 7:.....,.,.,..^,`.= ��._ w�_ i• �' �; S;i�a*:'.��'.��F.�,?.'�:i:���' There are several reasons why Rainier View should remain within the proposed annexation: The overwhelming sentiment here is for annexation to Tukwila, and not to Seattle. We like the schools in Tukwila, we like the services, we do not want to be part of Seattle. Seattle had its chance, and drew their line around us. If we are red -lined out of the annexation, we will be totally cut off from other areas of unincorporated King County. Being surrounded by Seattle on three sides, we are isolated enough as it is. The first reason that Tukwila should keep us in the proposed annexation is because of the voter base and its sentiments. Tukwila wants the industrial areas. There are only four major pockets of population which are capable of voting on this annexation. I recall that a similar annexation proposal failed miserably in 1981. Even though Rainier View does not have a lucrative tax base to offer, we can deliver the votes to make annexation pass this time. Due to the factors listed above, Rainier View residents have much greater motivation to vote for annexation with Tukwila than do the other three population pockets. With the possible exception of Allentown, the other population pockets have good reason to vote against annexation. Incorporation into the City of Tukwila will raise taxes, if nothing else. Rainier View will give you a majority to approve annexation. Myself and my neighbors will help deliver that majority. The second reason is that the exclusively single family residential zoning, at present, of Rainier View will not necessarily impede Tukwilla's goal of maximizing its tax base. I reside on the south side of South 114th Street. My neighbor, John Merriam - -with whom you also spoke at the fire station meeting, owns the house just west of me at 4939 South 114th. He and his co- owner, William Mackay purchased at auction the remaining county land, south of there, in September. If you look at a map as you read this letter, you will note that fully half the geography of Rainier View is either undeveloped or owned by Merriam, Mackay and myself: Draw an arc starting from my land on 114th, south to Martin Luther King (Empire), north to the Seattle City limit at Ryan Way and back east. I am busy raising a family at the moment, and value my house. Nevertheless, I would not oppose a re -zone at any time, for the arc I describe. I speak for Merriam and Mackay as well. They, as I, have enough land to protect ourselves, should we decide to stay rather than sell. This is significant since we are the only residents in a position to lodge convincing objections to a possible re -zone in the future. Were this "arc" I have described to be re- zoned, all access, utilities, etc. would be from Martin Luther King. There would be no impact, nor need for improvement, upon the residents north of 114th Street. Due to the topography, there would be little if any impact upon their view, drainage, etc. In other words, fully one -half of the Rainier View topography would be available to increase Tukwila's commercial, multi - residential and industrial tax base. It may be that this letter is unnecessary; that Tukwila has intended from the onset to include Rainier View in the annexation area ultimately proposed to the Boundary Review Board. Our feeling is that the desire for annexation has nothing to do with expanding the base of voters, but rather is motivated by the desire to expand the tax base -- businesses and industries not so demanding on a per capita basis for roads, schools, police protection, etc. I am loyal to Tukwila. My children attend your schools; you would provide me with better roads, utilities and police protection. Rainier View wants to be a part of Tukwila. We have no reason to expose the true motives behind the annexation effort, unless we are excluded from that annexation. Please present this letter to the entire Tukwila City Counsel. We want a 'yes' or 'no' answer, in writing and within the next 30 days, as to whether Tukwila intends to include the Rainier View community in its proposal for annexation. If the answer is 'yes', we promise to deliver persuasive witnesses to the hearing held before the King County Boundary Review Board, as well as delivering a popular vote. If the answer is 'no' , we want your promise, in writing, that I will be notified of Boundary Review Board hearings, well in advance, because at that point Rainier View will not be on the list of potential voters notified by mail by the County. I repeat: Rainier View wants to be a part of Tukwila. We are tired of being everybody's 'poor orphan'. If this annexation goes through without us, we will be cut off even from our foster mother of unincorporated King County. Despite the poor showing at the Rainier View Community Club, we are mobilizing. We are mobilizing either for you or against you. Include us. If Rainier View in not included, we will work to defeat the entire annexation. I apologize if I have come on too strong. I only wish to make our stance clear. We have all seen what happened when Seattle, on three separate occasions, chose to draw their lines around Rainier View. Please state your position within 30 days of your receipt of this letter. Very truly y9urs, ` `73 -,. Milan "Butch" Dukic cc: Rainier View Community Club John Merriam William Mackay Robert Staples v. n.rs. ,v:i r•,v -y:;, r . Sr'� `.� s ' ,'.,,ra ,? •any ;va�",t,"a y T*'°'F^7? w�tr.T+� �{ �«` �%. dnaJ:+. nx�Yi' uw '�R..,.7.{? :.55.a!u•'tx- a'�.... sir:':: �' �1.,. �.,,,.. �r a... 1` i »'.Lsrde'.:.v+W`Si:."i 5 .�..'::..'1AI�;�.AC$�st'S+KA;?. •lt.,'4.a. {L,.. x...._...e�T�.�N . r. �". �'J lr�l'- �i' �,`. �i�s .n.3�t.r.,..r,`'�fi��:.dr'..: �.F���,�'S�4.k'.e .Aa.':. n4:'� -. I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: Q Notice of Public Hearing 0 Notice of Public Meeting El Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet E� Planning Commission Agenda Packet [I Short Subdivision Agenda Packet AFF I"AV IT OF DI STR I'UT I ON 0 Notice of Application for E] Other Shoreline Management Permit El Shoreline Management Permit t311 Other NEWS RELEASE - FIRE DIST #1 OPEN HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT was mailed to each of the following addresses on THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 1987 , 19 . (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) Name of Project FIRE DIST #1 ANNEXATION File Number 87 -1 -A O Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice ,�,, v. c FLT? ��' �. ' � 7., �*.. �., �ui� ''ur`.� �Y �. ;S asju%7•.Milfii�atT; itin . = <3: Date: DECEMBER 3, 1987 For Release: IMMEDIATELY L City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor Contact: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF TUKWILA The City of Tukwila will be holding a Land Use Open House on December 8 and 9, 1987. These meetings are being held in response to the annexation petition received by the City for the annexation by election, of the area described as King County Fire Protection District #1. Planners from the City of Tukwila will be available to answer questions about a proposed comprehensive land use plan and comparable zoning districts. Maps and handouts on the proposal and land use standards will be available. On Tuesday, December 8, the open house will be held at the Duwamish Fire Sta- tion, 12026 - 42nd Avenue South, from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. On Wednesday, December 9, the open house will be held at the Rainier View Community Club, 10715 51st Avenue South, from 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. After comments and responses are received by the public, staff will prepare recommendations for the City's Planning Commission and City Council. A pre - annexation comprehensive land use plan and zoning districts will be adopted by ordinance by the Tukwila City Council in conjunction with any annexation decision taken by the City. )r r. ' ?'}' i. �" . ':.'.4 7 >'rrnF:Jt\'S.+ • ii's ' hF:k 4N m�,° u . u,..,.. L. �Fi.. �ll tl: i. iS�G.<,+ i. f�. JS+ tr_. �t. vl s.. a_• Ln�,.,.. wca�' i.; rw:.; �Yf: i!:? xFr,` �:. �' rn:! �+ SFK 4it�.;" isC..,.. a. a?'..: 7 .1: =:rtsr.4-anusr... rv. mrrtavrura4-,-,-,.26::.t:iw ass!' c. c.;. ?..,;•' .r ias.: rAS::.'^.• s: wn;' E:. c::". t= i!170I?' r,.!!.' :.-Rr: i% f.;" '.^:hI?VVIT%'!;•.7f.= 1."f+..'+� .'1.7;.1 ?tif•:C:RtisXT,C • e.• AFF'"'r"DAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, JOANNE JOHNSON hereby declare that: O Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting 0 Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet [l Board of Appeals Agenda Packet [l Planning Commission Agenda Packet J Short Subdivision Agenda Packet [� Notice of Application for (I Other Shoreline Management Permit 0 Shoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1987 , 19 (SEE ATTACHED) (Mailed to interested parties) File Number 87 -1 —A Q Determination of Nonsignificance Q Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Q Notice of Action O Official Notice In Other FIRE DISTRICT #1 OPEN HOUSE ANNOUNCEM Name of Project FIRE DIST #1 OPEN HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT ( / 1? Signature City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Fire District No. 1 Annexation LAND USE OPEN HOUSE Your attendance is requested at an open house on proposed Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and pre- annexation zoning for the annexation area. TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1987 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Duwamish Fire Station - 12026 - 42nd Avenue South WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1987 66 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. Rainier Vier Community Club - 10715 - 51st Avenue South The City of Tukwila is sponsoring the meeting to give you an opportunity to review and compare the current Tong -range land use plan versus possible alternatives to the plan. King County and proposed Tukwila zoning and development requirements will be compared. WHO WILL BE AVAILABLE? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND? Planners from the City of Tukwila and members of the Annexation Task Force will be available to answer questions and to listen and receive comments on the proposed land use plan alternatives and zoning comparisons. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE MEETING? 1. To meet on a one -to -one basis with residents, property owners and businessmen. 2. To identify the short- and long -term land use goals of the community. 3. To inform the area on the differences and similarities between King County and Tukwila zoning standards. Before a proposal is submitted to the Tukwila City Council for final action, your views need to be heard. Based on comments received from the Open House, consensus on the community's goals for the area will be summarized by City staff and the Annexation Task Force, and a final plan and zoning will be proposed. WILL THERE BE MORE MEETINGS? The City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on the Com- prehensive Plan and pre- annexation zoning to the City Council. The Council will then hold two addi- tional public hearings and adopt an ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and create pre- annexation zoning districts for the area. These meetings are tentatively scheduled for March and April of 1988. For further information on the proposal and open house, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw, Project Manager at 433 -1848. All correspondence should be mailed to: City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 10,11 UINIE City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 .11■11MIL :+eaa.. 'r"r"L:J.;,4 'r,>tlxz'YsiC15: 0 Notice of Public Hearing (J Notice of Public Meeting 0 Shoreline Management Permit a.w +zc;.r..f. x"I,4s, NV,"�w:tz .:1:11 e +r.M... as.M.0 1: ? [l Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Q Board of Appeals Agenda Packet Q Planning Commission Agenda Packet 0 Short Subdivision Agenda Packet AFF LJAV I T OF D I STR I:UT I ON 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit C�Pee. 14.51,1-..A. [] Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on (,� �P �4� Alin / ) 37 19 8 7 Name of Project 1 / elJ 1 File Number 37 -1 —A hereby declare that: ` 07..2 ,u Jas1i2L.' t;d;:r' O Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance 0 Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice 0 Notice of Action O Official Notice (Mailed to interested parties) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Fire District No. 1 Annexation LAND USE OPEN HOUSE Your attendance is requested at an open house on proposed Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and pre- annexation zoning for the annexation area. TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 1987 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Duwamish Fire Station - 12026 - 42nd Avenue South WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1987 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. Rainier View Community Club - 10715 - 51st Avenue South The City of Tukwila is sponsoring the meeting to give you an opportunity to review and compare the current long -range land use plan versus possible alternatives to the plan. King County and proposed Tukwila zoning and development requirements will be compared. WHO WILL BE AVAILABLE? Planners from the City of Tukwila and members of the Annexation Task Force will be available to answer questions and to listen and receive comments on the proposed land use plan alternatives and zoning comparisons. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF THE MEETING? 1. To meet on a one -to -one basis with residents, property owners and businessmen. 2. To identify the short- and long -term land use goals of the community. 3. To inform the area on the differences and similarities between King County and Tukwila zoning standards. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT THAT YOU ATTEND? Before a proposal is submitted to the Tukwila City Council for final action, your views need to be heard. Based on comments received from the Open House, consensus en the community's goa s for the area will be summarized by City staff and the Annexation Task Force, and a final plan and zoning will be proposed. WILL THERE BE MORE MEETINGS? The City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on the Com- prehensive Plan and pre- annexation zoning to the City Council. The Council will then hold two addi- tional public hearings and adopt an ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map and create pre- annexation zoning districts for the area. These meetings are tentatively scheduled for March and April of 1988. For further information on the proposal and open house, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw, Project Manager at 433 -1848. All correspondence should be mailed to: City of Tukwila Planning Department 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 City of Tukwila' PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 slaP3:ri:tttd Aru w,,._ nrNnxm :<av„o.�wv.,...,.......«,. wr...,.......,.,...,.., u..«.. .....,.....�......�.r- ...._.._. Dear Ms. Rafatjah: MCB /sjn enclosure City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Ms. Inga Rafatjah U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Eup. Technical Library CEEUD, CEEUD- IM -SML APO NY 09757 November 16, 1987 Thank you for responding to the notice of annexation. The sewer issue has not been decided. It appears that most of the residents in the area (who are on fixed incomes) are concerned about the sewer issue because of the increase costs associated with sewer service versus their current septic system costs. Utilities are normally self- supporting and paid for by the system's users. Alternatives exist, but have not yet been discussed. I will note for the record that you are interested in sewers. Enclosed is a sample of a tax rate comparison between King County and Tukwila. As you can see property taxes are lower in Tukwila than in unincorporated King County. If you have any additional questions concerning the proposal, please free to contact me at (206) 433 -1848 or at 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188. Sincerely, 4.k( ( Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner 4 1 /2.e -lege() cV/7.9ce* > ddr- ' /1-e-e ' e S - 7A/6. A- PA.,c--� J :4/4 ; * T -5 -eZt-e- -/1"-7 7/L-7";"44 /1P6 Al Y ©P" [.10v/ 1 3 19871 CITY OF I'uKy; ILA PLANNING DEPT. • • • .. . - 1 I .,- av , ic . e 1. 11I `l The City of Tukwila r' ived a petition for annexatio6, iy election of the King County Fire District Nu. 1. The petition has been certified to be sufficient and the City has hired a consultant to prepare an environmental impact statement on the proposal. You are invited to - attend. a scoping and informational meeting on the pending proposal for the annexation of the Fire District to the City of Tukwila. The initial meetings will be held for the area, which is identified on the attached map. To help understand each area's unique concerns and questions, the annexation area has been divided into an east and west side. An additional meeting will be held for all business owners in the area. For the area east of I -5, as Tue ay, September 29th 7:00 p.m. For the area west of -5, as shown on Wednesday, e tember 30th 7:00 p.m. For the business owners ii the annexation Tuesday, Sept- ber \29th 1.'00 a.m. shown on the attached map, a meeting will be held: Duwamish Fire Station 12620 - 42nd Avenue South the attached map, a meeting will be held: Rainier View Community Club 10715 - 51st Avenue South area, a meeting will be held: Duwami sh rrStat,i on 12620 - 42nd Avenue South • What information will be ava = ble? • Find out where your property is to •ted on a large map of the annexation area. • Find out how the annexation process wor • Comment and raise questions on wh conc rns you have with a potential change in jurisdictions. • Find out who you currently re -ive services fro and if that might change. • Pick up informative writte material describing the ty and its services. . Who will be at the eating? Representatives fro the City of Tukwila, King County Panning and Community o l tant hiri1 t do an rv ir c A rn r�nt2l i•f111�?r't statement will�be hand to � .. listen comments and 4estions. • Will there e more meetings? In November and December, as information on the effects of the proposal and proposed comprehensive and plan zoning amendments become available, you will be notified of other public meetings and when they will be held. For further information on the pending proposal, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw, Project Manager, at 433 -1848. All correspondence can be mailed to Tukwila Planning Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188. 1'`� �� ���' "'ill. S ''1: � r Y�.��fi� J t .�..,� �;''. { lts��s�brt�:' �..; x: �+: Ntri4r�- �tiE�C.�a�''.�F��;?�iR+�,i._ � Crw,... v:> L; ii?.: ��k'` ��.!". rc' k`: r', utx 3m�. su: f °.a:stinrw_aarzx.�,armc<a;�kmm; .;Ctiauvl�.*.i:F'?:'l €r..�Cif :.l.�.+ �z�:l'.�i£: ".���'�.k , :+ «":rs3a >.��.u�.f��.r &: G. Gogerty & Stark, Inc. Business /Public Affairs Consultants October 23, 1987 Ms. Moira Bradshaw, Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Moira: Thank you very much for meeting with our South Park residents. As you can probably tell, they are very special to us. They trust us and we like them and are especially interested in helping them determine their own future in the fashion they desire. You did an excellent job of dealing with them honestly and openly, which they appreciate and respect. You have the list of participants who were there, so you do not need a list from me. I would appreciate it if you would send them the same information which you are providing the members of the task force for the time - being. As that information gets more technical or becomes specific to other areas, some modification of what is sent will be appropriate. I will contact the other people who are actively involved in this process down there. It is my job to keep them informed and to assist them in their review. As you recall, Marian Crawford recommended a bus tour of South - center. I will follow up to make the necessary arrangements. I would hope that we can provide a tour of City Hall itself as part of their itinerary. Thanks again, for a job well done. Sincerely R.W. Wilkinson Jr. cc: 2505 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 728 -6100 Barbara Gladding, Boeing Ron Altier, Jorgensen Steel Jon Nichols, Rhone- Poulenc Rick Beeler, City of Tukwila MIROM OCT 28 1987 CITY OP TUKU� ��A PLA \IN:NG DEPT. Ms. Moira Bradshaw Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Dear Moira: BARGHAUSEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. "Land Planning, Survey, and Design Specialists" October 23, 1987 Annexation Petition Related to the Proposed ARCO AM /PM Mini- Market Facility to be Located at the East Corner of Empire Way South and South 129th Street, King County, Washington ARCO No. SA 367/Our Job No. 2621 Pursuant to our meeting of October 22, this letter shall serve as confirmation that the above referenced site lies outside of the area which is currently in the process of annexation into the City of Tukwila. The proposed limit of annexation is private property to the southwest of Empire Way South. If, in the future, the proposed boundary is to be adjusted to include property to the northeast of Empire Way South, this office would appreciate notification. In the meantime, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. would like to be included in the mailing list for any public notifications regarding this proposed annexation. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and follow up in regard to concerns which the City of Tukwila may have in respect to a possible rezone application for the above referenced site. Sincerely, .E.---- Bruce McCrory, Planner BM /lc C286.65 cc: Mr. Walter Tubandt, ARCO Petroleum Products Company Mr. John Yada, ARCO Petroleum Products Company Mr. Gary Heitlauf, ARCO Petroleum Products Company Mr. Will Wolfert, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. +. ectmonvattvlo.?4*Cr...M fI1711 \ b itocu.w'.HSacrom ma'AM.yerenlemlar.014,A Home Office: 18215 72nd Avenue South • Kent, Washington 98032 • (206) 251 -6222 Sacramento Office: 3134 -A Auburn Blvd., • Sacramento, California 95821 • (916) 484 -1212 a A.;.�:i�,``�il October 16, 1987 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Barbara Y. Spinpoch, Mayor City of Renton. 200 Mill Avenue South Renton, WA 98055 RE: Fire District No. 1 Annexation Dear Mayor Si ' poch I apologize for not responding to you earlier on your request to modify the annexation boundary. Your suggestion for our staffs to discuss an adjusted boundary is appropriate and I have so directed Rick Beeler to contact Larry Springer. I understand Renton's interest in the area in the east of Monster Road and expect that we can jointly develop a position for pre- sentation to the Boundary Review Board. As you know, Tukwila had to take the annexation boundary as given in the election method petition. Our environmental impact statement now being prepared will address that boundary and deletion of some logical sub - areas, one of which includes the area of your interest. Rick will give Larry copies of the draft and reports associated with it. My primary concern about that area is the potential siting of the ERR facility at the Black River Quarry. So far this does not seem to be the intent of King County but I don't want to preclude Tukwila from direct involvement in that development should it occur. Therefore, I suggest that Rick and Larry explore options to assure Tukwila some standing in review of such a facility. I am confident that this can be done. Sincer an D'sen ayor GLV:miw cc: L. Rick Beeler ... ...................... r._'::t �:.:l �L;...:: dRU '.'t;(,+:F.F: °•C5i,-ri +,'4"`�: %..,. „ .r..... ���.+.'��MAc.:i:'. Yr �i�,. T.�. " 1 A`.� , 747,1u.,...,:! ::. OF R€ A v t y © z o A3 �o • sEPSE October 13, 1987 Gary L. Van Dusen, Mayor City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Proposed Annexation of Fire District #1 Dear Matra Van Dusen: THE CITY OF RENTON MUNICIPAL BUILDING 200 MILL AVE. SO. RENTON, WASH. 98055 BARBARA Y. SHINPOCH, MAYOR 235-2580 r In May of this year, we received a request for comments from your staff regarding the proposed annexation of Fire District #1 to the City of Tukwila. We responded in a memo dated May 21st (attached) generally supporting the proposal, but requesting that the annexation area be modified slightly (as identified in an attached map) in the vicinity of Monster Road. We didn't hear anything to the contrary and assumed that Tukwila was agreeing to delete the contested area from the proposed annexation. We were surprised last week to learn the proposal has not been modified as we had requested. Larry Springer of my staff has discussed this matter with Rick Beeler and has been assured that it is not too late to get together and work something out. It is our understanding that one of the alternatives in the draft annexation EIS is essentially the requested Renton modification. Unfortunately, it is also our understanding that the official forum for any modifications is the Boundary Review Board. Renton will have to ask the BRB to invoke jurisdiction, conduct a public hearing, and thereby modify the proposal. We would hope that our two cities could work something out ahead of time which we could jointly advocate at the BRB. My staff prefers that the area east of Monster Road become part of Renton. We are less interested in the territory west of Monster Road to the BN right -of -way but would be willing to provide services in that area if Tukwila is not interested. These issues should be discussed, and I would propose that our staff people get together to see if they can resolve some of these questions. If this is agreeable to you, I would suggest that you have Rick Beeler contact Larry Springer as soon as possible. .. �diiri��F� .�a•�'h�� "s�� :�[4. Sincerely, .ltb h 0.J Barbara Y. Shinpoch Mayor BYS:LMS Attachment cc: Larry M. Springer Gary L. Van Dusen, 'ayor October 13 1987 Page 2 I would appreciate any help you can give us on this matter and anticipate that we can resolve it as productively as we did the boundary line adjustment. 1C,r'V1�!JS�' Estate of Fred J. Abrahaam Post Office Box 61592 Vancouver, WA 98666 Gentlemen: I , r dam': City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 MCB /co �. L . eas- h-A.a -4 . L-c -54 - j ka.- wM -ec. October 5, 1987 I can be reached at (206) 433 -1848 or we could meet if you prefer. We would like to resolve this issue as soon as possible. Sincerely yours, ".101:x.7i7 Vak't x'.iEM '5t;': :.y'SMMtn;, The City of Tukwila received a petition for the annexation to the City of the area encompassed by King County Fire District No. 1. Your property is bisected by a perimeter boundary line of the Fire District. The City Council of Tukwila would like to know if you would like your property included or excluded from the annexation petition. The issue must be resolved; as the effected property owner, we feel you should have a voice in that decision. If you choose to include your property, it would be a part of the annexation process along with the entire annexation area. This is a complex issue, and I would be happy to discuss it with you. Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner ? INTERURBAN '4 TRAfiYS '' a!9 20 " kot5 i Gov't. ' 2 .0 Acres 4 t 1 401 1 I 1% t'1 1 l 1 t '1 t 12 051 6A so 12 13 2 Hi 26 9 e0( 6 VACATED 40 5 115TN STS 25 1O *� 9 � �• ' ~ _' . � _..i I.� '. - . __ s , e • M s .i I.� '.^ 24 .1+ 40 � _I 1 ���— I(l it /90 I gy p. 23 Iv 1� .9 2:::.,.6.? ' ' • — 1 7 52 i iro 22 I� 17 1 . .N.:42 . _., •i:_ . .. ---- 1 1 //s -rr 5 16 17 19 20 12.1 ;.22 . .� r I i (7N •vi 1 C/ am M/RE sr JAMES R. MURPHY P.O. BOX 101 Beavercreek, OR 97004 ( f City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 October 2, 1987 Dear Mr. Murphy: Thank you for responding to our notice on public information meetings. I found 4905 Creston (107th Street) on a large scale map we have of the annexation area. Enclosed is written information that we distributed at the meeting. We expect to finish the Environmental Impact Statement being prepared on the impacts of the proposed annexation in the first quarter of next year. After it is issued, there will be a public hearing before the Tukwila City Council, King County Boundary Review Board, and then will be placed on the ballot for a vote. It is anticipated that this will occur in late summer /fall of 1988. I have enclosed an absentee ballot application, but at this time, the election date has not been set, and we will not know the date until next summer. You will be put on our mailing list and will continue to receive any information that we produce. Thank you again for your interest and response. MCB/co 20/MB.10 -2L2 Enclosure Sincerely yours, 14/a/mAx/ Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner (, - 1 r;C .1987 cam^- (P-e."14 ,/ee 6z r 4f.4.„e l . .1e4eA4 e.v-eLe-zof ,)tiLL cL,121-Le-t4- (1-4. l9o3 CYPs /o,/ � Y`ac /( /5- /I ays -/c / s tyAci e co vG/e ci /7t/ LA!s //2-1,-te,Le fl U "a' i,1( /a/ fi.e-A■ ve )- Q vie% f. r C' ;'�.�S,yy��+'i:X 4f r� Zy ..t..1.., .. hY�',(... 1908 City of Tukwila Z 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Gary L VanDusen, Mayor a• ; 1 mss= ;� ■.7 =�.! Date: SEPTEMBER 22, 1987 For Release: Contact: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW 433 - 1848 The City of Tukwila received a petition for annexation by election of the King County Fire District No. 1. The petition has been certified to be sufficient and the City has hired a consultant to prepare an environmental impact statement on the proposal. Representatives from the City of Tukwila and King County will be available at the following meetings to describe the annexation proposal, the area , and explain the annexation process. For the area WEST of 1-5 a meeting will be held Tuesday, September 29th, at the Duwamish Fire Station, 12620 - 42nd Avenue South, at 7:00 p.m. For the area EAST of 1-5, at meeting will be held Wednesday, September 30th, at the Rainier View Community Club, 10715 - 51st Avenue South, at 7:00 p.m. For business owners in the annexation area, a meeting will be held Tuesday, September 29th, at the Duwamish Fire Station, 12620 - 42nd Avenue South, at 10:00 a.m. Information will be given as well as comments and questions solicited at the above meetings. Any written comments can be sent to Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner, City of Tukwila, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. ra.- ,n:51 tit`. x N'� h !A° .9!• . unw' "'• x^ �' ' x � tfic47? �`! .i:, . �. t . ..+ t "•�'L r~r.":,1..; v Y+ qlt� :.,,, _(j:/.= ... i'i:� 'Iv':� ;ta3:. 1 •:E § r . .z { . .,,, Y . 'r?2'.'-�.kr' s, 71 _ i�ro . 1 `!i• °% •; ,;�� �, y St y_,yw � vr h. >:rrC�„ • :i �k,.rJ•4 a.z..,E._u. 4.vY �t:... t... �a: �c. �.:! fa'• r'.;: ��' ni,;,, �4d,'• >xiC�'xr,�,:tu:��'�;v.�.. r �3.r .�It:( >>.. �4.t.1.i. ,. . (J Notice of Public Hearing A Notice of Public Meeting O Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet 0 Board of Appeals Agenda Packet O Planning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet Name of Project �l � `! � A. MAr File Number 1 AFF •)AVIT OF DISTRI -'" UTION 1, hereby declare that: O Determination of Nonsignificance O Mitigated Determination of Non - significance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action O Official Notice [[ Notice of Application for 0 Other Shoreline Management Permit O Shoreline Management Permit [( Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on /8 (Mailed to interested parties) , 198: City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 Fire District No. 1 Annexation Public Information Meeting The City of Tukwila received a petition for annexation by election of the King County Fire District No. 1. The petition has been certified to be sufficient and the City has hired a consultant to prepare an environmental impact statement on the proposal. You are invited to attend a scoping and informational meeting on the pending proposal for the annexation of the Fire District to the City of Tukwila. The initial meetings will be held for the area, which is identified on the attached map. To help understand each area's unique concerns and questions, the annexation area has been divided into an east and west side. An additional meeting will be held for all business owners in the area. For the area east of I -5, as shown on the attached map, a meeting will be held: Tuesday, September 29th Duwamish Fire Station 7:00 p.m. 12620 - 42nd Avenue South For the area west of I -5, as shown on the attached map, a meeting will be held: Wednesday, September 30th Rainier View Community Club 7:00 p.m. 10715 - 51st Avenue South For the business owners in the annexation area, a meeting will be held: Tuesday, September 29th Duwamish Fire Station 10:00 a.m. 12620 - 42nd Avenue South • What information will be available? • Find out where your property is located on a large map of the annexation area. • Find out how the annexation process works. • • Comment and raise questions on what concerns you have with a potential change in jurisdictions. • Find out who you currently receive services from and if that might change. • Pick up informative written material describing the City and its services. be at the meeting? Representatives from the City of Tukwila, King County Planning and Community Development Division, and the consultant hired to do an environmental impact statement will be on hand to listen to your comments and questions. • Will there be more meetings? In November and December, as information on the effects of the proposal and proposed comprehensive and plan zoning amendments become available, you will be notified of other public meetings and when they will be held. For further information on the pending proposal, contact Moira Carr Bradshaw, Project Manager, at 433 -1848. All correspondence can be mailed to Tukwila Planning Department, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington 98188. Economics Finance Policy Analysis September 8, 1987 MEMORANDUM TO: Moira Bradshaw FROM: Annc DeVries CCA Inc 10014th Avenue Suite 3025 SeattIe,WA 98154 -1107 (206)223.0767 RE: Significant Boundary Line Issues in the Tukwila Annexation The boundary line for the Tukwila annexation, as currently drawn, involves a number of divided properties. The Boundary Review Board discourages new boundary lines being drawn which divide property. There are two kinds of divided properties at issue in the annexation area. First, a number of lots in the I -5 East subarea already exist in a divided state, falling as they do on the existing boundary between the City of Seattle and the unincorporated portion of King County. Annexation of this arca by Tukwila would simply change the jurisdictions having an interest in the property. Second, there are two large parcels -- one containing the Boeing plant at the north end of the Boeing Acccss Road North subarea and one containing a Rainier Bank facility in the Allentown subarea -- which exist in thcir entirety in the unincorporated portion of King County but which would be divided by the currently proposed boundary line for the Tukwila Annexation. Boeing Parcel. The assessed value of the total lot which is divided by the line showing Rose Street extended is $11,383,300. In addition, Boeing has personal property (equipment) in the North Industrial subarea totalling $156.2 million; as Boeing owns a number of properties in the North Industrial subarea, we do not have a breakdown on what portion of this personal property figure is associated with this particular divided lot. As noted in the Existing Conditions report, the lot north of the divided lot represents total assessed valuation (real and personal property) of $67.6 million. This lot is included in the Study Area totals. Rainier Bank Parcel. The Tukwila annexation would divide a lot in the Riverside area which currently contains a Rainier Bank processing facility. The 1987 assessed value for real property is $11.1 million (for the 1988 assessment, the assessed value is $17.4 million); data for the personal property assessment is unavailable at this time, but can be deemed to be significant. This parcel is taxed by the Fire District #18 and the assessed value does not appear as part of the totals provided in the Existing Conditions report. Annexing this property would deprive Fire District #18 of the tax revenue generated by this facility. • 2s 2 �� 3 242 50 C(BE RIcSH/RE N ,(7, •3 c 45 r d• te n• k5 r - - --� 501 1 ^ 0 411 ""trt s , City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard ,1908 Tukwila Washington 98188 (201) 433 -1100 Gary 1. VanDusen, Mayor TO: Mayor VanDusen PROM: Moira Carr Bradshaw DATE September 2, 1987 SUIUECT: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION MEMORANDUM INTRODUCTION This is the first of an ongoing series of information discussion papers that will come to you regarding Fire District No. 1. The EIS consultant has completed a background /inventory of the area. During the course of their review, several boundary questions were raised that now require decisions by the City. Issues and options are listed below on the boundary topic as well as on pre- annexation comprehensive planning and zoning. Council discussion and decisions are requested to facilitate further review and direction. Staff will be arranging several public meetings for expanded scoping and to provide information on the proposal to the annexation area's residents and businessmen. Attached to refresh your memory is an expanded version of a description of the annexation process; similar attachments will be given to the public. The first set of meetings will be September 29 and 30. The Council's role and level of involvement in the public meeting process is also being requested at this time. ISSUE I - COUNTY ISLANDS WITHIN ANNEXATION AREA Several parcels within the interior of Fire District No. 1 were not included in the legal description attached to the petition received by the City. These parcels, if the Fire District is annexed as it is currently described, would be County islands within the City's corpor- ate area (Attachments B and C). Option 1 The City can consider the annexation and land use impacts of these islands in the EIS currently being prepared. The City could then propose to the County Boundary Review Board (BRB) the annexation of the islands if and when the Fire District is annexed to the City. MEMORANDUM to: City Council Page Z September 3, 1987 There are several methods the City could use to accomplish the island annexations. A. Petition for Election which is identical to the subject petition and could occur simultaneously. (This method requires 1) the property be occupied by a a registered voter and 2) the resident's consent to sign the petition.) B. City initiated resolution and ordinance for annexation. Option 2 The City can allow the islands to remain, if and when the Fire Dis- trict is annexed as it is currently described. This is an undesirable option for service and clarity reasons. ISSUE II - BOUNDARY DISCREPANCIES Along the perimeter of the annexation area are several tax lots and structures which are bisected by the current legal description. This places tax lots and buildings in two and sometimes three separate jurisdictions. These areas would present jurisdictional service questions and are basically undesirable. From a revenue stand point, whichever juris- diction has the majority of the tax lot, receives the revenues. For example, Attachment F is a map of the Rainier Bank Center at 12400 East Marginal Way. Part of the property and building are in Fire District No. 1, but the majority of the property is in Fire District No. 18. The issue becomes more complicated when portions of buildings and tax lots are already partially within the City of Seattle. As the Fire District No. 1 boundary is currently drawn, portions of the buildings and lots are in Seattle, portions are in the County, and the remainder are proposed for annexation to Tukwila (see Attachment D). Option 1 Where tax lots and buildings are currently partially within an in- corporated areas' city limits, readjust the Fire District No. 1 annexation limits back to allow future eventual annexation of the lot and structures by the municipality with this partial jurisdiction. This option would likely leave a county island surrounded by incor- porated areas until the lot is eventually annexed - a short term consequence versus the long term effects of multiple jurisdictions. Option 2 Adjust the boundary descriptions to include all the remaining area within a lot. This will eliminate all unincorporated islands located between municipalities. This option would eliminate the County as an interested agency and the City could attempt a mutually agreeable boundary adjustment between municipalities similar to the Renton /Tukwila agreement. MEMORANDUM to: City Council September 3, 1987 Page 3 The disadvantages of this option are the uncertainties of negotiations with affected municipalities and property owners. The advantages, if all parties were willing to negotiate, would be a more logical boundary for the City's service role, a more regular and identifiable boundary, and the elimination of multi - jurisdictional developments. Option 3 Leave the boundary description as it is proposed with its boundary bisecting buildings. This option leaves the issue unresolved and places the burden upon the BRB. In order for the BRB to modify an annexation proposal, they must conduct more than one public hearing and bear an administrative expense. ISSUE III - PRE - ANNEXATION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING The petition for the annexation of the Fire District did not include a request for simultaneous zoning. The petitioners are voters or residents of the area. A large number of commercial property owners are not represented through the petition process and therefore, not possibly involved in the annexation petition process. Business owners are the most anxious about zoning and its effect on present and future land uses and standards. To postpone zoning until after the election would be a minimum two -month lag in time when they could not receive building permits for improvements or tenant changes, permits for tenant improvement, Option 1 The City reviewed two areas within Fire District No. 1 during two separate previous annexation attempts referred to as Riverton and Allentown. The City adopted pre- annexation zoning ordinances which are in existence and could be utilized. The disadvantage of this option is that review for both ordinances and their subject areas were in 1979, utilizing an out -of -date Tukwila zoning code. Since that time, Tukwila has adopted a new zoning code, land uses in the areas have changed, and development has occurred. The second disadvantage is that these ordinances do not cover all of the Fire District (see Attachment G). Option 2 The City could utilize the existing ordinances, modify areas that have undergone any changes from single - family residential and review and adopt comprehensive plan designations and zoning for areas that have not been reviewed in the past. This option would create a zoning designation for all properties to be annexed and would be more timely than perhaps a review of all properties within the Fire District. MEMORANDUM to: September 3, 1987 City Council Page 4 (20 /MB.FP0.1,2) The major emphasis could be on areas outside the City's planning area where no previous City review has occurred. ISSUE IV - ANNEXATION PUBLIC MEETINGS Accurate communication of annexation facts to the public is essential for informed, knowledgeable decision- making and to dispel false rumors, misunderstandings and incorrect information. The staff plans to hold two meetings at the end of September to further scope for any concerns or impacts and to describe the proposal and annexation process. A second meeting will be held mid - November to discuss the direct benefits and costs of the proposal based on date received from the consultant. Prior to dissemination of any fact sheets, the staff will brief the Community Affairs and Parks Committee to keep them apprised of the proposal's progress. Based on the selection of an option below, the review /preview could be with whichever group, whether it's limited to 3 or the entire council, is chosen for the process. Option 1 A group of not more than three councilpersons may wish to attend these meetings. The Community Affairs and Parks Committee could be selected as the councilmembers assigned to attend. Coordination and workload would be optimized by using an existing committee. Option 2 A rotating schedule of all councilmembers would be an opportunity for the entire legislative body, prior to the annexation public hearing, to listen to concerns and aspirations of the annexation community, thereby giving all councilmembers exposure and involvement in the project. Option 3 The Council may wish to form an ad hoc committee to be their advisory group on the subject proposal. Option 3 could take advantage of and offer opportunities to council- members who have expertise or skills suited to the project. FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXt TION STUDY NORTH FIGURE ASSELT D. L.C. NO.5S MATT Q L. C NO 38 "10 14 71aPs Ir I r/ T 1Wei er No. y ZoiN 5M-Tl1iE GAY ► , *Aim Gov't. Lot 13 2734 Acres /AIi .01. NOR7d r Il •�. f1 • �v I N., ni • Ki I nt N • o \ 't o \ � 2 A itoi 0 13 2 NEKA COR AD! NA 48 Ac. • IV i Z C • 0 • \ 41* 100f N .. i. U � w t. tso 4` i 1 " , y de 1 w /0 40 1 /0J IS 04p d a�o,.o.os o N07 a =OPEN o 120TH3 a= \ w 4.a w JC • . oONAr/O7 CCLA/y 0 41 b h` • T 24' IL s --- /24T - ST 41 T f;n 32 32 1 I ' "1 v I b 3 4 I 1 NI. i• • . 31 2 31 2 I quo M 33 • 2 • _. 3 :74�. 30 3 1 : — i iI 32 .! 3 � � � .9 4 � 4 1 . 31 - - - -- - i : ! }- - •- -_ t- --1 ti 28 2 a + . • ; X 30 -I S r" _ I t t •� ^ - } -- 13 0 1 �-1+ 1 I � M 11 t �� 'l . ,R. " ---04------t4--1- > ----I-- f - - -- S -41 27 tior fr-LI ..a ►Y �c I . 9 26:a y: VA CA� en _ - - • j' �0 22 • 1 24 1 _ t VE - - - - - - 21 12 O Ill .r .- . I 1, '252' •!L!i!r_. j.2- �G � ,� ..O . . •' L . ? .4... . �_I< .` .�J �' 4 -- r = y 0 1 0 t3 22 I . 1 11 it 10 i6 5 3 :53 ;g : �—_ - _ ,�] . ; S r . 1 5. 1 l M • • 1 - f lc 1'I i ry • r . r"-� S - 7. 6 T t r- H 1 : >! p G - in: rt . . ri ; 71 ,S T ,.. I . . J 121 dT • .0 1 1 L s. NO i !•t. ` ." S '257" ST I ;p 785018 •. 4. r. 6 1.z ; 1` TNORTNL /NE Of C.C. LEWIS QONATION QA /M 37 \ - . 13 0 - \-4\ 22 21 100 6) 1 c••••• • 7-%\-..'" ' t lam - — A ' ''i.; , - 'WM 7,„..„,......4„..„...„.;,...........z \ M AW � . �� - 11 ®mss r .� r , � ‘N Iligit VIIIIIiit 1411510110i\ 4* "Il iEM Pik- : ... §*..'1‘■§- ir-- „ fl y •��i :.� e 111111111 T 0 N FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY MOUTH ot1P5 t De - ruguA A fu M/4m* AIWA FIGURE CITY OF TUKWI WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO ll i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING A LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING REGULATION FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS ALLENTOWN AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID LAND USE PLAN ANDZONING REGU- LATION UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. I.UUIVI.IL HU I IUii MEETING Tr PE w Rwl DA AGENDA MY 7 /9 7/6 3 A CT I ON -J Rh WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may, at some future time, be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance #986 of the City of Tukwila, concern- ing environmental policy and the State Environmental Policy Act, an environ- mental assessment has been prepared and reviewed by the Responsible Official of the City and a negative declaration reached and said environmental assess- ment and declaration have been available through the review process, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Planning Commission has recommended adoption of a land use plan and zoning regulation as an extension of the Tukwila Comprehen- sive Land Use Plan to include said area under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330, and WHEREAS, two public hearings upon said proposal were held upon proper public ntoice before the Tukwila City Council on 21 May 1979 and 25 June 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Tukwila as follows: Section 1. The zoning map for the Allentown area as prepared and published by the Office of Community Development for the City of Tukwila, attached hereto as Exhibit A and contained in Planning Division file no. MF 79 -11 -CA is hereby adopted for the area hereinafter descirbed, pursuant to the authority and provisions of RCW 35A.14.330. Section 2. The policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance #1039, together with the regulations and restrictions for land use and devel- opment being the Tukwila Zoning Code, Title 18 of the municipal code, as here- tofore and hereafter amended shall apply to said area in the manner set forth in the land use plan and zoning regulation herein adopted. Section 3( ..,at at such time as said desc'` area, or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area is thereby annexed shall be subject to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning regula- tion herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regu- lations for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The proposed C -1 zoning for the neighborhood grocery store at the southeast corner of 42nd Avenue South and South 124th Street; as well as the proposed M -1 zoning in the northeast portion of the planning area are both shown on the Comprehensive Plan as single- family. It is deemed that the proposed zoning on these pieces is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the map is hereby amended to be consistent with the zoning action taken by this ordinance. Section 5. The area subject to said plan and zoning regulation and map is described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the Easterly line of State Sign Route No. 99 at its intersection with the thread of the Duwamish River in Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; Thence Easterly and Southerly along the thread of the Duwamish River to its intersection with the Easterly margin of 42nd Avenue South, said point of intersection being also the existing city limits; Thence Easterly along the existing city limits as established by City of Tukwila Annexation Ordinances No's. 255, 259, 244, 252, and 494 to the point of intersection of said city limits with the southwesterly right -of -way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad, said point being on the Northsouth centerline of Section 14, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said Southwesterly right -of -way line of the Burlington Northern Railway to its intersection with the Northwesterly margin of Interstate Highway 5; Thence Northerly and Westerly along said Westerly line of Interstate Highway 5 to the North line of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; Thence Westerly along said North line of Section 10 and continuing Westerly along the North line of Section 9, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, to the Easterly margin of State Sign Route 99 (Pacific Highway South); Thence Southerly along said Easterly margin of State Sign Route No. 99 to the thread of the Duwamish River and the point of beginning; Except any portion thereof lying within the northwest quarter of Section 11, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian. Section 6. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of City Clerk B. Office of Community Development ? C. Department of Public Works • D. City Attorney Section 7. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this /0 day of 1979. Approved as to form: City Attorney ATTEST: Published: Record - Chronicle 7- 20 -79. 4 Edgar II Bauch, Mayor Maxine Anderson, City Clerk S. I' i‘ NMI* to )( IL L Inot 1.1.1116.1. INST /-/ ir - • - 1 I , • I, V •••• • • • • .40 • • , west ••• I MMMM OOO 0.• • aeLy - y _;„.. s " • 4 •••• • o' • • 1/44 • .1 i — 7 ii • 6" '" , -- • • s CITY OF TUKWIL WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING A LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING REGU- LATION FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS RIVERTON AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING REGULATION UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that hereinafter described area may, at some time in the future, be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance #986 of the City of Tukwila, concerning environmental policy and the State Environmental Policy Act, an environmental assessment has been prepared and reviewed by the Responsible Official of the City and a negative declaration reached and said environmental assessment and declaration have been available through the review process, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Planning Commission has recommended adoption of a land use plan and zoning regulation as an extension of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Plan to include said area under the provisions of RCW 35A.14.330, and WHEREAS, two public hearings upon said proposal were held upon proper public notice before the Tukwila City Council on October 22, 1979, and November 26, 1979. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The zoning map for the Riverton area as prepared and published by the Office of Community Development for the City of Tukwila, attached hereto as Exhibit A, dated September 25, 1979, and contained in Planning Division File No. MF 79 -14 -CA is hereby adopted for the area hereinafter described, pursuant to the authority and provisions of RCW 35- A.14.330. Section 2. The policies and standards,for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039, together with the regulations and restrictions for land use and development being the Tukwila Zoning Code, Title 18 of the municipal code, as heretofore and hereafter amended, shall apply to said area in the manner set forth in the land use plan and zoning regulation herein adopted. EXHIBIT roved as to form: Section 3. That at such time as said described area, or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and zoning regulation herein adopted an extension to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. Some areas on the proposed zoning map may be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan Map, these actions occurring as a result of public hearings and related input. It is deemed that the proposed zoning in these areas is consistent with the policies of the Compre- hensive Plan and the map is hereby amended to be consistent with the zoning action taken by this ordinance. Section 5. The area subject to said land use plan, zoning regulation and map is described in the attached "Exhibit B ". Section 6. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of City Clerk B. Office of Community Development C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 7. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a regular meeting thereof this /7C-* day of December , 1979 City Attorney, Law - nce E. Hard ATTEST: Published: Record Chronicle - December 28, 1979 4:i 4464P da4g4At Edgar D. auch, Mayor •� / Maxine Anderson, City Clerk ri R-I-12O 1 44.12d R.1.72 i I P,-I-72 e i N 1 2.-z..., -2... R-1-120 ; R R-I-12 r ---- ' r' \ `; • RH-72 \ C-2 \ „ad 711— I R-1.12C4141.1-1aliF11-721 R-1-72. R -1-72 i— t F=36,1 C.11 #3_01 R.1 • A R-I -72 ' ,R19T1 11f R-i-; EXIIIP!T A POTENTIAL RIVERTCN ANNEX-TiON AREA PROPOSED ZONING R-I-72 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS R-1-96 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS R-I-120 ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS R-3 71-iPEE ANC FOUR FAMILY DWELLINGS C-I • .EGHBORHOOD RETAIL 0 LOC.L RETAIL `i1-1 LIG*7 INDUSTRY L._ s E. SC 9-25-7'9 • 411 N. ...,. ,.. , 7. S SI 1 2 IT 0% 1 • . - 7;•7*. *** 8¢i_ aVV..Z:it - iZ: ;G. 4' I: F, R' ?tf iSibS ,'7�'�w': %+iE }]liiis.Za :y -';2' i Ri3 ✓.`....ia .y}i�J'i2i4 a k.�.,f f PAR Encls. as noted Mn {Jl�3A Washington State Boundary Review Board For King County King County Courthouse Seattle, Washington 98104 Telep April 10, 1987 TO: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW CITY OF TUKWILA FROM: PAULA ANNE RUSSELL, Adm. Asst. IN RE: REQUEST FOR REVISED LEGAL FILE 'NO. 1450p CITY OF TUKWILA Proposed Annexation (K.C.F.P.D. #1) Enclosed please find a copy of the letter from the County Engineering Staff regarding the legal description and related Assessor's maps submitted as part of the above Notice of Intention. If you are in agreement with these comments, please submit a revised legal description at your earliest opportunity. We suggest you direct any questions regarding this matter to Jim Bergsma (Department of Public Works) on Extension 4134. CC: Office of Council Clerk, 402 Courthouse Jim Bergsma, Dept. of Public Works, 900 Administration Il 1 APR 1�'--' 1987 CITY UI- f UKW LA PLANNING_DLPT. • King County Department of Public Works Donald J. LaBelle, Director 900 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 344 -2517 April 7, 1987 Mr. G. Brice Martin Executive Secretary Boundary Review Board W -378 Courthouse NoVV kiPH D � 1S8y � VASHING TON STATE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FOR KING CO. ,.a "'ter...�"rx�,C.i.a."""�Ft; M:1 t�rtit,_. , P B`z.,,'•�" ).1 >a "i ..' ill k3 c4':�/7:. - 4 � - .. .. RE: Proposed Annexation to CITY OF TUKWILA (KCFD #1) Temporary File No. 1450P Dear Mr. Martin: We have checked the legal description of the attached proposed annexation and find it unsatisfactory. The legal description provided with this action appears to be an accurate representation of the existing boundary for Fire District No. 1. As you know, city annexations have several requirements which differ from those processed by utility and service districts. A prime example is the restricted use of road centerlines in city annexation. Our review of this proposed annexation has noted several problems with the attached legal description. The following represents some of the problems noted: The legal description follows centerlines of numerous roads. While we insist on the legal description following a road centerline when it is the existing boundary of a city, we do not allow it under any other cir- cumstance. A road must be wholly within or without an annexation area. The Fire District has several island areas that are outside the service .7 boundary of that district. Adoption of the District's existing boundary will create small islands of County area inside the new city limits. The portion of Green River lying north of the area annexed to the District by Resolution 114 should be included in this city annexation. This office would prefer a perimeter boundary legal description for the total area of intended annexation rather than the segmented type just reviewed. We object to the time wasted reviewing internal match lines. The related Assessor's map appears to be for the same area as described in the legal description. n`s'i 7dm v406i4#aJ:.' aYR�F5d1L97Da13`i Mr. G. Brice Martin April 7, 1987 Page Two This annexation does not appear to include a portion of a County park nor conflict with any other city in the vicinity. Very t .ly yours, e H Knight, '.E. Manager Engineering Services RHK /JRB:mw Enclosure: Entire File cc: Helene Mociulski 402 -A Courthouse AmYS ..P"'_+{SdCmmmiiftw1 mwmiiff, 1 H:87092.IgI Page 1 of 4 17 December 1987 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION [REVISED] BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89°17'40" E 868.00 feet, more or Jess, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approxi- mately 3,400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which also is the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said West margin of Airport Way South and the Westerly city limits of the City of Seattle, to the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along South 104th Street to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); Thence South along said Easterly boundary 620.00 feet, more or less, to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street; Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin to the inter- section of the East line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision 940.00 feet, more or less, to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the centerline of South 104 Street; Thence East along said centerline to the centerline of 51St Avenue South; Thence South along 51St Avenue South to the centerline of South 112th Street, being the Northeast corner of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along the East line of said Section 10, to an inter- section with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street, which is a point on the East line of said Section 10, distant 452.30 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Section; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County; Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. t Thence Southerly on the West side of said lot to the North line of South 11 4th Street, sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted in said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line to the present city limits on the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the centerline of Juniper Street, also known as South 120 Street; Thence East approximately 1,100.00 feet to the Northerly production of the centerline of Block 3, Allentown Acres, as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 22, Records of King County; Thence Southerly along said Northerly production and said centerline of said Block 3 to the Northwest corner of Lot 14, of said Block 3; Thence S 89 °37'00" E along the North line of said Lot 14 a distance of 93.03 Thence S 49 °17'20" W to the Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S.; Thence Southeasterly along' said Southwesterly margin to point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of said Allentown Acres with the centerline of State Road No. 2 (Empire Way S.); Thence S 40 °42'30" E along said centerline a distance of 818.62 feet; Thence N 49 °17'30" E to said Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S. and point "B" and the END OF DESCRIPTION: Thence S 49 °17'30" W a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 40 °42'30" E a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 49 °17'30" W to an intersection with the Southwesterly margin of said State Road No. 2; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to the intersection of the North and South centerline of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence South along said North and South centerline to the South line of South 140th Street; Thence Westerly and Southwesterly along the Southerly line of South 140th Street, also known as Beacon Coal Mine Company Road, to the Northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; Thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line to the centerline of 68 Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8, Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); Thence Northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road, County Road No. 8 and Monster Road), as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats, Page 75, Records of King County; Thence Northwesterly along said road centerline 250.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139 Street), as platted in C.D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as Recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 24, Records of King County; Thence Westerly along said extension to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, Page 545, Volume 821, Page 263 of deeds, Records of King County; feet; 1 H:87092.1g1 Page 2 of 4 EhO Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 1H:87092.191 Page 3 of 4 Thence Northwesterly along said margin 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 in said Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line, 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 79, in King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an Intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56 Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133rtl Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread 2,150.00 feet. more or less, to a point opposite the South line of Tract 33, Riverside Interurban Tracts, as recorded in Volume 10, Page 74 or Plats, Records of King County, Washington; Thence West to the West line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 850.00 feet to a point opposite the South line of Tract 22, of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; Thence West to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124 Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corner of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. ,. r.t.7' `,:", r9i c u a t r s n ze' Y "�1�� iCet- uin`°'�k'F �ik°'i�f`�:'S�f�.' Ufa. �aX?. tek. �+ �. v.a N9i` d'+1 �. 5. �rt wY; 3i' iu4': � ��i': ; ��:' �r� �. t l��� ' °til� r� }l��:c.. <.'t'r`:�",i�:u TRACT "A" 1 H:87092.IgI Page 4 of 4 NWT tF: Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to east line of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said East line of the Duwamish River, and . - waterway, to said South line of the North 825.00 feet of said J. Buckley D.C. #42; Thence Easterly along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 22, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Division No. 3, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County. AND EXCEPT that portion of the following described Tract "A" lying North of the centerline of South Barton Street extended Westerly. That portion of the Francis McNatt Donation Land Claim in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING on the Easterly margin of East Marginal Way at a point S 23 °40'59" E 895.56 feet from the intersection of said Easterly margin and the North line of said Donation Land Claim; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line of East Marginal Way 352.65 feet to the South line of Boeing Field; Thence N 89 °58'17" E along said South line of Boeing Field 474.62 feet to a point on a line which is parallel with and 500 feet Westerly measured at right angles to the center line of Boeing Field Main Runway No. 4; Thence S 29 °52'38" E along said parallel line 372.42 feet; Thence S 89 °58'17" W to the Point of Beginning. (Being known as a portion of Tract 6, The Meadows, according to the unrecorded plat thereof) 83 0 Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. lb - 1 .S' .4 I • 1 I KING COUNTY • ctqc 1 :41 NORTH FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION STUDY FIGURE 1 H:87092.IgI Page 1 of 4 10 December 1987 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR CITY OF TUKWILA - PROPOSED ANNEXATION [REVISED] BEGINNING at the intersection of the East margin of East Marginal Way South with the South line of the North 825.00 feet of the J. Buckley D.C. #42 in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Northwesterly along said East margin to the North line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line S 89 °17'40" E 868.00 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of • the Duwamish River; Thence following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approxi- mately 3,400.00 feet to the North border of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence along said section border which also is the Seattle City Limit Line S 88 °32'07" E 1,895.00 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; Thence Southerly along said West margin of Airport Way South and the Westerly city limits of the City of Seattle, to the centerline of South 104 Street; Thence East along South 104th Street to the Easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); Thence South along said Easterly boundary 620.00 feet, more or less, to the Northerly margin of South 107th Street; Thence in a Southeasterly direction along said Northerly margin to the inter- section of the East line of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the North line of South 107 Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; Thence North along the East line of said subdivision 940.00 feet, more or less, to the North line of said subdivision, also known as the centerline of South 104th Street; Thence East along said centerline to the centerline of 51S Avenue South; Thence South along 51St Avenue South to the centerline of South 112th Street, being the Northeast corner of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence continuing South along the East line of said Section 10, to an inter- section with the South line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street, which is a point on the East line of said Section 10, distant 452.30 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Section; Thence Westerly on the South line of said street to the Northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County; o Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. feet; 111:87092.191 Page 2 of 4 Thence Southerly on the West side of said lot to the North line of South 114 - sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted in said addition; Thence Easterly along said North line to the present city limits on the East line of said Section 10; Thence South on said East line to a point approximately 2,600.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 10 and on the centerline of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; Thence East approximately 1,100.00 feet to the Northerly production of the centerline of Block 3, Allentown Acres, as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 22, Records of King County; Thence Southerly along said Northerly production and said centerline of said Block 3 to the Northwest corner of Lot 14, of said Block 3; Thence S 89 °37'00" E along the North line of said Lot 14 a distance of 93.03 Thence S 49 °17'20" W to the Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S.; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of said Allentown Acres with the centerline of State Road No. 2 (Empire Way S.); Thence S 40 °42'30" E along said centerline a distance of 818.62 feet; Thence N 49 °17'30" E to said Southwesterly margin of 56 Place S. and point "B" and the END OF DESCRIPTION: Thence S 49 °17'30" W a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 40 °42'30" E a distance of 100.00 feet; Thence S 49°17'30" W to an intersection with the Southwesterly margin of said State Road No. 2; Thence Southeasterly along said Southwesterly margin to the intersection of the North and South centerline of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence South along said North and South centerline to the South line of South 140 Street; Thence Westerly and Southwesterly along the Southerly line of South 140th Street, also known as Beacon Coal Mine Company Road, to the Northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; Thence Southwesterly along said Northerly line to the centerline of 68 Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8, Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); Thence Northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road, County Road No. 8 and Monster Road), as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats, Page 75, Records of King County; Thence Northwesterly along said road centerline 250.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139 Street), as platted in C.D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as Recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, Page 24, Records of King County; Thence Westerly along said extension to the Southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, Page 545, Volume 821, Page 263 of deeds, Records of King County; 83.0 Hugh G.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 1 H:87092.Ig1 Page 3 of 4 Thence Northwesterly along said margin 2,400.00 feet, more or less, to the West line of the Northeast quarter of Section 14 in said Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; Thence Southerly along said West line, 120.00 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread in a Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 79, in King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said production and said Northeasterly margin respectively, to an intersection with the Southeasterly margin of 57 Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southeasterly production of the Northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said Plat; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly production and said Northeasterly margin to the Southeast margin of 56 Avenue South; Thence Southwesterly along said Southeasterly margin to the Southwest margin of South 133 Street; Thence Southeasterly along the Southwest margin of South 133 Street and the Southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence along said thread in a general Northwesterly direction to the intersection with the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 100, Records of King County, Washington; Thence Northwesterly along said Southeasterly extension and said Southwesterly margin 1,050.00 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; Thence Southwesterly along said Northwesterly line and the Southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly along said thread 2,150.00 feet. more or less, to a point opposite the South line of Tract 33, Riverside Interurban Tracts, unrecorded; Thence West to the West line of the Puget Sound Electric Railway right -of -way; Thence North along the West line of said right -of -way approximately 850.00 feet to a point opposite the South line of Tract 22, of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; Thence West to the East margin of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the Easterly extension of the centerline of South 124th Street; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124th Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East margin of 35th Ave. South; Thence Northerly along said East margin to the Easterly extension of the North margin of said South 124 Street; Thence Westerly along said Easterly extension and said North margin to the East line of Lot 9, Block 4 of said Riverton Addition; Thence Northerly along said East line and the East line of Lot 16, of said Block 4 and the West line of King County Short Plat No. 785018 as recorded under King County Recording No. 8603240930 to the South line of the Westerly portion of Lot 4 of said Short Plat; 0 HughG.Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. •A rt . r . ,. . � i', ... ryr .. ,µ,.... . � Y .r w r y r7 H .=:T...�:. s.c J�v._.. r.✓ t. �! t: �._. r` k,. t.. iv"' xF: A�. e«Y �.'. fa" kd. �ttmE.< J�' �< k;:�[:�n:'�a?.�;+a4ix'�s::���;5 ti42^ us21."> 2Xli1: Lt�:: i�J, l�' r: �:': tF`. u; G9:' A�.+ 1' ifv;°:+: d;.+ �S�" ��itiw�."�4n.r.;?'.��a'�Hstkt::` iii' �' ���re �t�.`•_, �_' �c. �' � �� ( d�:'.'�,�.'-:} � :: 1Y??3, i: 'F v+ '.�: >t:.,. TRACT "A" 1H:87092.191 Page 4 of 4 Thence Westerly along said South line to the Southwest corridor of said Westerly portion; Thence Northerly along the West line thereof to the Northwest corner of said Short Plat; Thence Easterly along the North line thereof to the Westerly margin of East Marginal Way South; Thence Northerly along said West margin to the South line of the North 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; Thence Westerly along said South line to the West line of Section 10; Thence Northerly along the West line of said Section 10 to east line of the Duwamish River; Thence Westerly and Northerly along said East line of the Duwamish River, and waterway, to said South line of the North 825.00 feet of said J. Buckley D.C. #42; Thence Easterly along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPT Lots 7, 8 and °9," Block 22, C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Division No. 3, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 86, Records of King County. AND EXCEPT that portion of the following described Tract "A" lying North of the centerline of South Barton Street extended Westerly. That portion of the Francis McNatt Donation Land Claim in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING on the Easterly margin of East Marginal Way at a point S 23 °40'59" E 895.56 feet from the intersection of said Easterly margin and the North line of said Donation Land Claim; Thence Northwesterly along the Easterly line of East Marginal Way 352.65 feet to the South line of Boeing Field; Thence N 89 °58'17" E along said South line of Boeing Field 474.62 feet to a point on a line which is parallel with and 500 feet Westerly measured at right angles to the center line of Boeing Field Main Runway No. 4; Thence S 29 °52'38" E along said parallel line 372.42 feet; Thence S 89 °58'17" W to the Point of Beginning. (Being known as a portion of Tract 6, The Meadows, according to the unrecorded plat thereof) Hugh G.Qoldsmith & Associates, Inc. • -- EXHIBIT A -- LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 7, 8 AND 9, BLOCK 22, C.D. HILLMAN MEADOW GARDENS, DIVISION #3 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 12 OF PLATS, PAGE 86, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY. SSESSOR • / w , .7 >• , I TH 5T al r 1 ° 1 • i • f a . T .. �� ; I i I i v, • .o s. a� A? Se r r • - L i s iw I \ ' �tl a, I Imo ,a . . � � : •- � 1 I ; I I i - -1.._ r -' 1 l "_I el u ���' v M� ti a E 4 ---1- , • j _ . i 3c, 1%qq -bt c'' ,,,v , r i • , : . . DO 1r , b,r11 cra'l - i n L.-7 .■ ..." 21 • ; II' � � 30[ is A f r r, ,t. ,e I .s ;4 I ' 4 µ r � r � f '� r- 'alb_ As_ ++y , . - �i ▪ If • o • II so .e :, �s r a — j 1 :i:. - tO . 5 1 p y I ,:-.. ' ,e) IA t) I • I �!'' r---.:.-73 i2L „ —? o \�y ^I ` � O �t .P .5s •0 4 I, 275 • —* *aft + ' oLir o• 5 . 1 ,"y i• 44 • d • • I _ • a��• • v l I F- a •sk . . Li 1 _ __ 1 / >� r a M r I i r• a 5 r 1 ] al, sow!- •a ( •a t t . ` i••af =� 1 1 y ' TH 4 T. r • , • 4 40 ` • r ,f) �L \ �, � + i , $ t• I •f ar►` •A dt so i• t i ZS t t� 0- •. .• pod I • iii, r , "L '� \ * � , i-/ S a 7 }1 I I l� ^ •` fly I to J� II r a�. j _ '�p • 1 20 r : � o L .12.42.4_,.. it 1' I . 1 4 a a 1 ; • • K r ` T � �JL . • t • _ .0 1' `` ,4-1- —/— Q" 1t..-1 � ^I 7 70th � e • 6 �.9� , 4• ▪ • 1' is.•t 7.: N " • , • /, u �W f �� w I 1.4..11 i t `" , r • 1• 6 1 � 2 �; ,-- • L B b 10(.3 0 ( s e as •‘ 4 e°1 ?.. 4 - < <•� E -- EXHIBIT B -- NW 10 SCALE I'- 100 4 4 8. as a• mow 23 4 1 � /N4G AEI - e • r ► e 6 fi � _T a - f, i -1 t Dear Mr. Martin: MCB /sjn enclosure • Ci ty of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter'Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Can L. VanDusen, Mayor Mr. Brice Martin, Executive Secretary King County Boundary Review Board Room W378, King County Courthouse Seattle, WA 98104 Subject: Notice of Intention - Annexation King County Fire District Number 1 s 0- tjf a '� rx�+;�S3, e, cr,N a m i$ i, fi `^? � R � v¢ r b * -� T ��? � ;..; �ii;.Y,n�.y.�51�si{�`r,'% March 23, 1987 In follow -up to our telephone conversation, this letter is to officially notify the Boundary Review Board that the City of Tukwila has received an annexation petition for the annexation of King County Fire District No. 1 to the City of Tukwila. The petition is for the election method of annexa- tion and has been certified for correctness by the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office and certified for sufficiency by the Tukwila City Clerk. Enclosed are a Notice of Intent and a request for the BRB to invoke juris- diction on the pending annexation. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is currently being prepared by the City and we would request that you delay hearing this matter until the EIS is complete. If you have any questions or require additional information at this time, please call me at 433 -1848. Thank you for forwarding this request for Boundary Review Board consider- ation. Sincerely, Aa __;/(0.(4g/li()--- Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner NOTICE OF INTENTION ' As required by RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby given to the King County Boundary Review Board by the City of Tukwila. Enclosed are eight copies of the Notice and its attachments. 1. Background Information: King County Fire District No. 1 is the area defined in the petition for annexation to the City of Tukwila (See Attachment D). Portions of this service district have been the subject of various unsuccessful annexation proposals reviewed by the BRB in the past. The service district as a whole is a linear - shaped district that extends between the Seattle and Tukwila corporate limits with a portion extending parallel to Tukwila's north /northeast boundary to the Renton corporate limits. The Tukwila City Council is has approved a service contract with Fire District No. 1 to provide fire service to their area. Because areas comprising Fire District No. 1 have a history of annexation attempts, the City of Tukwila requests that the BRB invoke jurisdiction and allow the City to proceed with an EIS that looks at the entire area and alternative boundary configurations that would consider the factors of RCW 36.93.170 and provide information to the BRB to assist in their decision - making relative to the objectives of RCW 36.93.180. 2. Attachment A is a certified copy of a Tukwila City Council resolution expressing intent to consider the annexation of Fire District No. 1. 3. Attachment B is a copy of the Determination of Significance. The City of Tukwila will be responsible for preparing an environmental impact state- ment on the significant impacts of the proposed annexation as well as on the possible alternatives to the proposal. 4. The City of Tukwila proposes annexation by the petition- initiated elec- tion method of land area contiguous to the present incorporated limits. The area is known as King County Fire District No. 1 and this action is proposed under the applicable provisions of KCW 35A.14.020, 050 and 100; and 36.93.100 and 160. 5. Attachment C is a legal description of the area involved in the proposed action. 6,7,8 Attachment D is a King County Public Works Planametric map at 1" = 2,000' scale, which shows the area involved in the proposal, Tukwila's corporate limits, and boundaries of units of government in the area. Attachments E, F and G are reduced copies of the above map showing appropriate service districts. 9.A. The annexation area population is estimated at 2,227, which is 1.31 persons per acre. The 1987 assessed value for district is $399,583,537; therefore, per capita assessed valuation is $179,426.82. NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 2 9.B. The land uses in the proposed annexation area are diverse. The northern and central portions of the Fire District are developed with industries producing airplanes, asphalt products, chemicals and trucks. Service industriel as a hotel, food services, administrative services and a museum are also located here. A corner of the King County International Airport is located in the northeast section. Low - density residential neighborhoods are located in the central portion of the area. Neighbor- hood retail and low- to high- density residential development is located in the southern portion along with a quarry, truck terminal, junk and dump site, and several other light industrial uses. Anticipated land uses would be those similar to existing uses. Proposed zoning would be as consistent as possible between the two jurisdictions' zoning codes. 9.C.1 The areas referred to as Foster Point and Allentown north to the Boeing Access Road are within the City's comprehensive planning area. Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan was adopted by ordinance on September 19, 1977, and was revised on March 16, 1982. C.2 Tukwila has no franchise in the area. It does not anticipate requesting a franchise amendment to cover the area in the near future. C.3 A majority of the area is encompassed in the King County Community Planning area of Highline as depicted on Figure P1 -3 of the County Comprehensive Plan. However, only the area west of East Marginal Way, a manufacturing area in the northeast corner of the intersection of the Boeing Access Road and East Marginal Way and the area east of SR 599 are actually designated on the Highline Community Plan. C.4 There are no additional County policies, regulations or studies subse- quent to the County Comprehensive plan which directly affect this area. C.5 The King County zoning districts in Fire District No. 1 include: RS -7200 - Residential Single - Family RM -2400 - Medium Density Multiple Family RM -1800 - High Density Multiple Family RM -900 - Maximum Density Multiple Family BN, BC - Neighborhood and Community Business CG - General Commercial ML, MP, MH - Light Manufacturing, Manufacturing Park, and Heavy Manufacturing Attachment H is a map of the fire district, which identifies areas where reduced zoning maps were available. The areas not shown were not avail- able from King County in reduced form. A proposed comprehensive plan amendment will be discussed in the EIS for the proposal. The impacts and alternatives of the proposed comprehensive plan for the area will con- sider the existing zoning and land uses. C.6 There is not a basin -wide sewer /water plan. The County sewer /water plan affecting this area states that extensions will be encouraged for areas not currently served by sewers. NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 3 9.D. The topography of the area encompasses the relatively flat portion of the Duwamish River Valley along East Marginal Way and possibly a small portion of the Black River basin and the steep east valley wall along Empire Wag: Both of these elements serve as natural boundaries in the area. 9.E. The Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG) has projected negligible population growth for the annexation area. The proposal lies in Forecast Area Zone (FAZ) 4000, Skyway /Boeing Field, and is primarily in census Tracts 263 and 261, where population is expected to decline from the years 1990 through 2000. The Riverton FAZ 3820, which is west of the Duwamish Area, is also projected to decline in population by the year 2000. The City of Tukwila has a population of 4,780. The forecast by the PSCOG shows a population increase; however, these attendant projec- tions numbers given are inaccurate primarily due to annexation and therefore change of tract boundaries. 9.F. The City of Tukwila has approved a service contract with King County Fire District No. 1 to provide fire service for the area proposed to be annexed. Service will continue from 12026 - 42nd South and from 5900 South 147th and 444 APE. Police protection would be provided from 6200 Southcenter Boulevard upon annexation by the City of Tukwila. Tukwila would also assume road and storm sewer maintenance. Maintenance service would be provided from the City Shops at 600 Minkler Boulevard. Typically, water and sewer service would remain with the existing service districts. The City of Seattle also provides water to an area in the northern portion of the District and possibly to the Skyway area. The City of Renton is also providing sewer service to a multiple - family development in the District. 9.G. The location of Tukwila's community facilities include Tukwila City Hall and Police Station which is approximately 2.5 miles from the Allentown area. The Tukwila Community Center is approximately one -half mile from Allentown; the Tukwila Library is approximately 11 miles. Various parks including Foster Golf Links are i to 2i miles away. 9.H.1. Municipal services presently available to the area: SEWER: The City of Seattle serves five major industries and twelve other businesses in the proposed annexation area. The Skyway /Olson sewer district serves parts of the southern and south- eastern portion of the District excluding the Foster Point area. The Val Vue Sewer District joined with the Duwamish Sewer District and services a portion of the central part of the Fire District, primarily commercial uses. The City of Renton includes in both their sewer and water planning areas the Black River area in the southern most portion of the District. Renton sewer service is provided to a multiple - family development on Empire Way. o, .:,t.. ;'•`l �'�,.+[.� ... %i. �.Ss-�`:�. .'[�Pa,� f.:.. v�� ,t, i:. +.vi „�. �. cit ,F . j. {; i�, NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 4 A majority of the residential areas rely on septic tanks and other on- site methods for sewerage disposal. WATER: TM City of Seattle Water Department services the industrial/ - commercial area located north of 115th Street in the northernmost half of the District and possibly additional locations in the Skyway area. Water District No. 25, which lies entirely within the Fire District, provides service to the central area of the District. Water District No. 125 provides service to a small area located on Empire Way and East Marginal Way, west of SR 599 and south of the Duwamish. POLICE AND GENERAL SERVICE: King County administers the police and general services associated with governmental service. FIRE: Tukwila has a contract with King County Fire District No. 1, to provide fire services to the area. Mutual aid agreements surrounding fire departments or agencies are also in effect. Three large industries, Boeing Kenworth and Monsanto, have contracts with the City of Seattle for fire protection and emergency medical services. H.2 The current and proposed development is consistent with the "urban” designation in King County's Comprehensive Plan. H.3 Present costs of City of Tukwila and costs in Fire District No. 1 are described below. A. PROPERTY TAXES - 1987 Taxing Districts Fire Dist. No. 1 City of Tukwila State of Washington $ 3.78389 $ 3.78389 King County 1.83959 1.83959 Port of Seattle .40813 .40813 Emergency Medical Services .250 .25000 Fire District No. 1 1.5 - -- City of Tukwila 2.92792 County Road (1,2,3) 1.58324 - -- Library (1,2,3) .5 Hospital (1) .27673 Seattle School (2) 2.54451 South Central (3) 2.76022 2.76022 Renton School (1) 2.28851 Tax Rates (per $1,000) Ranges $11.96975 between (1) $12.39059 (2) $12.40936 (3) $12.62507 .300111:4 k i41EtY!'.YitS :fi'ch'•:Yri :Z= i{Ft'i£14 N Aft k T ZS uii� 1'^' �T L h•' ; s'• t -• a dttw. �.?te tk� Off ..�:....:,�.lY.�•+7:E1Y3?° >k'*r,7�ie`+A. " T' tS' �>' F': Jl", �s' �iYe..&t.. t�! �. t1: t: 11xtCaG" k. St. 1C' tfis "S ? /!'�:!;21Fti�1:"T.iYx"��'io c B. WATER RATES Water District No. 125: City of Seattle: Meter Size NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 5 Meter Size Minimum Charge I" $ 5.00 1" 7.00 1i" 10.50 2" 17.50 3" 31.50 4" 59.50 6" 115.50 8" 170.50 The rate shall be the minimum charge, and 40t for every 100 cubic feet over 100. Skyway /Olson Water: Commercial and residential rates are a bi- monthly charge of $18.00 for the first 600 cubic feet plus 75t for every additional 100 cubic feet. Water .District No. 25: There is a minimum bimonthly residential charge of $16.00 for first 800 cubic feet plus 70t for every additional 100 cubic feet. The minimum bimonthly commercial charge is $48.00 for the first 800 cubic feet plus 70t for every additional 100 cubic feet. The meter size used in this district is 5/8 ". I" $ 1.40 1" 2.40 1i" 3.60 2" 5.70 3" 11.40 4" 6" 8" - Minimum charge /month - Residential Commercial $ 2.40 3.60 4.80 6.90 12.60 23.40 41.00 72.00 For every 100 cubic feet, commercial accounts pay an addition .343Q and residential accounts .665Q. aw�� ttas ", ?,,c 3''`v4A3tfia'l <u ! :a fi i k i;; s i; s` s'±'.•`, i1! CYi; T, t".t A} s#14wl= tvtnw1xr ,vru..r.,z:.v.: lvvvxwameawmaanrm v:wnwac.rit490 mx+2 1. City of Tukwila: C. SEWER RATES Commodity Rates: Meter Size Minimum Charge 1" 1 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 0 - 2,500 2,500 - 35,000 over 35,000 :4'iGi:d:luk113hY: acs!v:• 9„! 75MFIATIEA T4C1. 'i'i� S.f ':el,'F; :T.0 kn d�;e tip• NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 6 $ 6.80 10.80 15.30 19.80 37.80. 50.80 92.80 140.80 The minimum charge is for 500 cubic feet or less. For each 100 cubic feet in excess of the 500 cubic feet allowed for the minimum charge, the rate shall be 50it per 100 cubic feet. City of Renton: Basic Service Charge Meter Size Minimum Charge I" $ 3.40 1" 4.70 1i" 7.40 2" 12.20 3" 24.70 4" 42.65 6" 92.15 8" 162.70 10" 252.65 12" 362.10 $ 0.08 per 100 ft 0.82 per 100 ft3 0.71 per 100 ft3 Skyway /Olson Sewer & Water: Residential - $17.50 a month 30.20 Commercial - total cubic footage of water divided by 900 times 17.50 on a monthly basis Val Vue Sewer: Residential - $26.90 for every two months Commercial - $26.90 for the first 750 cubic feet and $3.59 for every additional 100 cubic feet 4.y: -('F: !:Y:fi J.Y a;..�.r :1•: :'SL"•^+ .. %:.. �.�.,�r.j^..; kY 'n.'Ui rVM fi '' .r:: ; u.m.... .... "tis:: .. .., w. , +. ,._ �.,bl�a�t, +lr �.•).v'��' >';P:r.. r..a;�?�.. . >,. � °c�.__... `r �.. �. ._�. *: {�. ,.. _..,.. �: t, ,.. ._... ....2'iia .... �.... .t..+ . NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 7 City of Seattle: Commercial /Industrial /Multiple Units: A minimum charge of ` $2.34 plus $1.82 for every 100 cubic feet of water used. Residential: A minimum charge of $2.34 plus $1.82 for every 100 cubic feet of water used. The rate is based on a once -a -year reading for the lowest 4 months of used water. City of Tukwila: Commercial /Industrial: A minimum charge of $9.50 per meter for up to 900 cubic feet plus $9.50 per each additional 900 cubic feet or fraction thereof. Multiple - Dwelling Unit (permanent type): Each condo and apartment unit will be charged a flat rate of $4.00 with no additional charges for volume. Residential: Each dwelling unit will be charged a flat rate of $4.00 with no additional charges for volume. City of Renton: Renton Single - family residence - $3.85 City Sewer All other users - $385 per 900 ft water used D. ELECTRICITY No change in rates would result from annexation since electrical energy is supplied to unincorporated areas and to incorporated areas at the same rate. H.4 Two other municipal entities are adjacent to and in close proximity to the annexation area. The City of Seattle borders portions of the Dis- trict on the north and northeast, and the City of Renton is adjacent to a small boundary line of the District in the south end. H.5 Annexation itself is likely to have little or no impact on the area's development and its subsequent need for services. Annexation will improve the availability and cost of providing emergency services for citizens. H.6 The proposal may increase the level of service for the annexation area. Due to the proximity of two other municipal entities, the EIS will address the impacts of service by Tukwila compared with other govern- mental units. �.+1.1Ya: tt .� .•�.% t , " • °.M1S tYr.1'Y! F.: Yi; �. .,,� y F „�s.. �eq '•V,yi., ,s: .� , T :I.'". G t . ,,. F. r. �"• �ci�m .... �c.....r%•4i:;a.:.:.:.a.,+�;:3� �i�_i.z • .. ., ;..,,, ...�• wnx ^ �..t It • : n,. �r f. � . . �°i`?••, a �k. Z�... s..{; �` A.... 1” �rd<,. �,. x, �i' i.< �:'. �., �� .in•�:��r- Aay.u- -- �.�r:: >y.���^ � ....f,�i�4,:..�.4:kl.Lv`�..i,_ 11. The required filing fee of $25.00 is attached. MCB/ s j n Attachments: C A. Tukwila Resolution B. Determination of Significance C. Legal Description D. Annexation Area Map E. School Districts F. Sewer Districts G. Water Districts H. Zoning Respectfully submitted, Moira Carr Bradshaw Associate Planner NOTICE OF INTENTION Page 8 Tukwila has approved a contract for fire service with the District (see #9F). H.7 The intricate character of finances, debt structure and contractual obligations and rights is difficult to address in this preliminary Notice. This subject will be the one of the primary impacts discussed in the EIS. 9.I An EIS is being prepared which will analyze the multiple jurisdictional impacts of this proposal. The annexation area as it is currently des- cribed is an area of contrast - a heavy industrialized area which effects the region economically and environmentally and at the other end of the spectrum a residential component with rural service levels. In addition, three municipalities consider parts of the area within their planning or service areas. The expanded Notice will consider the economic and social impacts of the proposal on King County and other affected governmental units. 10. The proposal or possible alternatives would support the stated objectives of Boundary Review Board in the following ways: RCW 36.93.180(3) Creation of logical service areas. RCW 36.93.180(7) Adjustment of impractical boundaries. RCW 36.93.180(8) Annexation to a city of unincorporated areas which are urban in character. Notices, processes and other communications regarding this proposal should be directed to the undersigned at Tukwila Planning Department who will ensure that appropriate copies are distributed to all interested parties. 0042.010.004 JEH /ko 03/12/87 ATTACHMENT„ A C CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. /C.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, EXPRESSING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION OF THE AREA COMMONLY KNOWN AS KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT TO ANNEX WITH THE KING COUNTY BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD. WHEREAS, King County Fire Protection District No. 1 is contiguous to and generally north of the current Tukwila City limits, and WHEREAS, a petition signed by 96 registered voters of the unincorporated territory within the boundaries of the Fire District and expressing support for and seeking annexation to the City of Tukwila via the election method has been received by the City, and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office has certified the petition for annexation to the City and the City Clerk of the City of Tukwila has certified the validity of the signatures on the petition, and WHEREAS, the City's SEPA Responsible Official has issued a Declaration of Significance (DS) for the proposed annexation and preparation of an environmental impact statement is soon to be undertaken, and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously expressed its encouragement to the residents of King County Fire Protection District No. 1 to submit an annexation petition to the City and the City Council intends to strongly consider approving the annexation once an environmental impact statement has been prepared for the proposal, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a Notice of Intention to Annex the property should be filed with the King County Boundary Review Board in order to begin the review process of that body as soon as possible, now, therefore, CERTIFICATION COQ, City Clerk of the C;;•y of Tttwila, do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original on file with the City. DATED this /E'day of 19 el. City Clerk THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Expression of Intent. The City Council of the City of Tukwila hereby expresses its intent to consider the annexation of the property commonly known as King County Fire Protection District No. 1, a petition for the annexation of which has been filed with the City of Tukwila and is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. The Council will proceed to consider approving the annexation as soon as an environmental impact statement for the proposal has been completed. Section 2. Authorization for Mayor. The Mayor of the City of Tukwila is hereby authorized to file a Notice of Intent to Annex Fire District No. 1 with the King County Boundary Review Board and to take all necessary steps to process the same to conclusion. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this /d di day ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: I CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY AT ORNEY BY FILED WITH THE ITY PASSED BY THE CITY C RESOLUTION NO. /6.3‘ of CLUtL'C/N APPROVE ■■ • _3 -/3. 5 3 i6 -. 5'7 WE • , 1987. AN, COUNC IDENT WAC 197 -11 -970 District No. 1. by April 17, 1987. Responsible Official Rick Beeler Renton boundary. Lead A gency: Li of Tukwila Position /Title Proponent petitioners from Fire District No. 1 ATTACHMENT B File No. EPIC -3 - 87 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, T DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE AND REQUEST FOR, COMMENTS ON,SCOPE OF EIS Description of Proposal Annexation of 2.6 mile area defined as King County Fire Location of Proposal, including street address, if any generally from Southwest corner of Boeing Field to north Tukwila boundary and from Duwamish Waterway to EIS Required. The lead agency has determined this proposal is likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) and will be prepared. An environmental checklist or other materials indicating likely environmental impacts can be reviewed at our offices. The lead agency has identified the following areas for discussion.in the EIS: infrastructure, land use, intergovernmental, service, fiscal and budgetary Scoping. Agencies, affected tribes, and members of the public are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. You may comment on alternatives, mitigation measures, pro- bable significant adverse impacts, and licenses or other approvals that may be required. The method and deadline for giving us your comments is: in writing to . Moira Carr Bradshaw, Associate Planner, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Planning Director Phone 433 - 1845 Date March 13, 1987 Signature You may appeal this determination to the Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. ATTACHMENT C KING COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1 (Legal is written to street centerlines) ... ,.... .... ? 5. . ..�...',!:!}` "•':.'. .'7..�4. „ti BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of East Marginal Way South and the westerly production of the centerline of South Rose Street; THENCE southeasterly along the centerline of East Marginal Way South to a point which lies south 66 °18'57" west from a point "A" described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the east margin of East Marginal Way South, said point being north 23 ° 41'03" west a distance of 351.24 feet along said margin from the intersection of the south line of Henry Van Asselt donation land claim No. 50, with the east margin of East Marginal Way South, as marked on the west boundary of Boeing Field, said point also being the point of intersection of said east- erly margin with the shore line of the Duwamish River as established by Commer- cial Waterway District No. 1; THENCE continuing north 23 °41'03" west along said last margin a distance of 461.75 feet to Point "A" and end of said description; THENCE north 66 °18'57" east to Point "A "; THENCE continuing north 66 °18'57" east at right angles to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South a distance of 149 feet along the northwesterly line of Parcel "B" of a tract of land conveyed to Friday, Inc., by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 5286620; THENCE south 23 ° 41'03" east parallel to said easterly margin a distance of 259 feet; THENCE south 66 ° 18'57" west a distance of 149 feet to an intersection with the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South said intersection being a point 259 feet southeast of Point "A "; THENCE continuing south 66 °18'57" west to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE southeasterly on said centerline to the centerline of South Barton Street extended westerly; THENCE easterly along said extension and centerline of South Barton Street to the west margin of Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way; THENCE southerly along said west margin of Northern Pacific Railway right -of -way and the westerly city limits of the City of Seattle, to the centerline of South 104th Street; THENCE east along South 104th Street to the easterly boundary of Primary State Highway No. 2 (Empire Way South); THENCE south along said easterly boundar 620 feet, more or less, to the northerly margin of South 107th Street; THENCE in a south- easterly direction along said northerly margin to the intersection of the east line of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 3, Township 23 Legal Description Lf King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 2 North, Range 4 East, W.M., with the north line of South 107th Street, as conveyed to King County, Washington, by deed recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 3444401; THENCE north along the east line of said subdivision 940 feet, more or less, to the north line of said subdivision, also known as the centerline of South 104th Street; THENCE east along said centerline to the centerline of 51st Avenue South; THENCE south along 51st Avenue South to the centerline of South 112th Street, being the northeast corner of Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; THENCE continuing south along the east line of said Section 10, to an intersection with the south line of South 113th Street, sometimes called Avon Street, which is a point on the east line of said Section 10, distant 452.30 feet south from the northeast corner of said section; THENCE westerly on the south line of said street to the northwesterly corner of Lot 151, Block 16, C. D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 2, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 82, Records of King County; THENCE southerly on the west side of said lot to the north line of South 114th Street, sometimes called Augusta Street, as platted in said addition; THENCE easterly along said north line to the present city limits on the east line of said Section 10; THENCE south on said east line to a point approximately 2,600 feet south of the northeast corner of Section 10 and on the centerline of Juniper Street, also known as South 120th Street; THENCE east approximately 1,100 feet to the northerly production of the centerline of Block 3, Allentown Acres, as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 22, Records of King County; THENCE southerly along said northerly production and said centerline of said Block 3 to an intersection with the centerline of State Road No. 2; THENCE southeasterly along said centerline to the intersection of the north and south centerline of Section 13, Twp 23 N., Range 4E., W.M.; THENCE south along said north and south centerline to the south line of South 140th Street; THENCE westerly and southwesterly along the southerly line of South 140th Street, also known as Beacon Coal Mine Company Road, to the northerly line of the Pacific Coast Railroad; THENCE southwesterly along said northerly line to the centerline of 68th Avenue South (also known as County Road No. 8, Steel Hill Road and Monster Road); THENCE northwesterly along said centerline to the centerline of Beacon Coal Mine Road (also known as Steel Hill Road, County Road No. 8 and Monster Road), as shown on the Junction Addition to Seattle Plat, Volume 12 of Plats, Legal Description King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 3 page 75, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said road centerline 250 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the easterly extension of the centerline of Edward Avenue (now known as South 139th Street), as platted in C. D. Hillman's Seattle Garden Tracts, as recorded in Volume 11 of Plats, page 24, Records of King County; THENCE westerly along said extension 700 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly margin of the Northern Pacific Railway right - of -way, as recorded respectively in Volume 830, page 305, Volume 825, page 545, Volume 821, page 263 of deeds, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said margin 2,400 feet, more or less, to the west line of the northeast 1/4 of Section 14 in said T23N, R4E, W.M.; THENCE southerly along said west line, 120 feet, more or less, to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE along said thread in a northwesterly direction to the intersection with the southeasterly production of the northeasterly margin of Tract 74, East Riverton Garden Tracts, according to plat recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 79, in King County, Washington; THENCE northwesterly along said production and said northeasterly margin respectively, to intersection with the southeasterly margin of 57th Avenue South; THENCE southwesterly along said southeasterly margin to the southeasterly production of the northeasterly margin of Tract 51 of said plat; THENCE northwesterly along said southeasterly production and said northeasterly margin to the southeast margin of 56th Avenue South; THENCE southwesterly along said southeasterly margin to the southwest margin of South 133rd Street; THENCE southeasterly along the southwest margin of South 133rd Street and the southeasterly production thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE along said thread in a general northwesterly direction to the intersection with the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly margin of Richard Street, as platted in Allentown Addition, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 100, Records of King County; THENCE northwesterly along said southeasterly extension and said southwesterly margin 1,050 feet, more or less, to an intersection with the northwesterly line of Lot 32, Block 13, said Allentown Addition; THENCE southwesterly along said northwesterly line and the southwesterly extension thereof to the thread of the Duwamish River; THENCE westerly along said thread 2,150 feet, more or less to a point opposite the south line of Tract 33, Riverside Interurban Tracts, unrecorded; (THENCE west to the west line of the Puget South Electric Railway right -of -way; THENCE north ni•.3 �:, ...`.z Legal Description -, ro�„.f a King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 4 along the west line of said right -of -way approximately 850 feet to a point opposite the south line of Tract 22, of said Riverside Interurban Tracts; THENCE west 1,000 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the Pacific Highway, also known as East Marginal Way South, said point also being on the centerline of South 124th Street;) THENCE continuing westerly along said centerline to the southerly prolongation of the west line of Block 2, Riverton Addition, according to plat thereof recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, Records of King County, Washington; THENCE northerly along said west line and its southerly prolongation to the northwest corner of said Block 2; THENCE northerly along the east line of the west 820 feet of said Section 10 to a point "B" described as follows: BEGINNING at the west quarter corner of Section 10; THENCE south along the west line thereof 29.35 feet to the south margin of an easement granted to S. H. Vincent dated August 10, 1907, recorded under Auditor's File No. 503128; THENCE east along said south margin 820 feet; THENCE south 421.15 feet to Point "B" and END OF DESCRIPTION; THENCE east parallel to the north line of Government Lot 15 to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE northerly along said centerline to the south line of the north 1,168.66 feet of Section 10; THENCE westerly along said south line to the west line of Section 10; THENCE northerly along the west line of said Section 10 to (the north line of Government Lot 6 of said Section 10; THENCE easterly along the north line of said Government Lot 6 to the centerline of East Marginal Way South; THENCE northerly along said centerline to) the east line of the Duwamish River; THENCE westerly and northerly along east line of the Duwamish River, and waterway to the centerline of South Rose Street, extended westerly; THENCE easterly along the centerline of South Rose Street, extended to POINT OF BEGINNING. Except Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 22, C. D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Division No. 3, as recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, page 86, Records of King County. 'J:J..]Ys c 91w.S Sob` ki.''.[i4!,7=4W:.2. . r•Y�' .fJW-.' w�:{i.�Ti'.i.;�l`:.4: :A fje:M S. tl ^1^ t1� 4.' ,y�N�ig ..n3r(�.�!9u.>. �i).._.. wwu.... n: �r? ?; C�^ �. �W.. �.... w. r.'. tC� .�3c�"i:cn�r,t:'.'1 %u.U..,�r. Legal Description King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 5 ALSO INCLUDING EAST MARGINAL WAY CORPORATE PARK Lots 1 to 16, vacated Block 3 and Lots 1 to 8, vacated Block 4, in the Plat of Riverton, being a replat of Riverside Interurban Tracts, recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 36, in King County, Washington; together with the portions of 34th Avenue South and 123rd Street which attached to said lots by operation of law; also that portion of Government Lot 15, Section 10, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the southerly margin of Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR 599) with the westerly margin of East Marginal Way in the northwest quarter of said Section 10; THENCE south 16 ° 29'06" east along said westerly margin 534.84 feet to the true point of beginning; THENCE south 78 °43'27" west 415.05 feet; THENCE north 87 °30'37" west 726.40 feet to the west line of said Government Lot 15; THENCE south 01 °48'37" west along said west line to the north line of the aforesaid plat of Riverton; THENCE easterly along said north line to a line parallel to and 820 feet from the west line of said Government Lot 15; THENCE northerly along said parallel line 376.01 feet to the northwest corner of the Traverso property as described in deed recorded under Auditor's File Number 5612479; THENCE easterly along the north line of said Traverso property 474.74 feet to the westerly margin of East Marginal Way; THENCE northerly along said west margin to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Legal Description AND ALSO INCLUDING A PORTION OF KING COUNTY AIRPORT King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 6 A tract of land comprised of that portion of Boeing Field /King County Interna- tional Airport property located outside of the Seattle city limits, situated in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian in King County, Washington, described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Section 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, then along the easterly border of said Section 4 which is also the Seattle City Limit Line bearing south 0 °20'05" west 1,256 feet, more or less, to the northerly margin of South Norfolk Street; then north 88 °38'44" west 35 feet; then north 28 °18'38" west 740.43 feet; then north 28 °42'05" west 887.98 feet; then south 67 °27'45" west 596.56 feet; then south 89 °13'33" west 37.35 feet to a point on the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then following said margin morth 23 °41'00" west 1,373.66 feet; then south 89 °27'50" east 380 feet; then north 150 feet; then north 89 °27'50" west 456.27 feet; then north 23 °40'59" west 84.67 feet; then north 89 °58'17" east 518.49 feet; then north 29 °52'38" west 372.42 feet; then south 89 °58'17" west 474.62 feet to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then along said margin north 23 °41'02" west 1,096.57 feet; then north 66 °18'58" east 149 feet; then north 23 °41'02" west 259 feet; then south 66 °18'58" west 149 feet to the easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then along said margin north 23 °41'02" west 926.52 feet; then along a curve to the left having a radius of 2,914.92 feet, a chord of 1,278.21 feet and an arc distance of 1,288.68 feet; then north 49 °00'52" west 643.39 feet to the north line of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said north line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line south 89 °17'40" east 868 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; then following south- erly and easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, a distance of approximately 3,400 feet to the north border of the southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said section border which also is I A10. iL"o.44.1 i3;Yti- a4LkniR Legal Description ivfrtyr�A : `MSV King County Fire Protection District No. 1 Page 7 the Seattle City Limit Line south 88 °32'07" east 1,895 feet, more or less, to the westerly margin of Airport Way South; then along said margin south 17 °32'25" east 199 feet, more or less; then south 21 °47'12" west 25 feet; then also along the westerly margin of Airport Way South, south 17 °32'18" east 1,851 feet, more or less, to the easterly border of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said easterly border, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line 685 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; said tract of land contains an area of approximately 165 acres. r y, 44 e r 1� aE 4 E Ray 3E 5 E hattuck _ • Rainier Beach L 1111111111111111111 imumwmirimms. TOBINNi II i v i SC/0100 12/5°61/C7 =2Z3 D/57Eler / 9ErZOI 1 1 z 3 a 4 v 1)447 R 111-°416 ee'm e ihfl‘ weroffox 4rrxemmexir Ill,7 SEW Eli iV'iC1 # vi ND. j . SEWCR DI6f ' f - 8tootJomeleS AST lo 'r a• w .71 , W.S. 4 toemon 1\ 1 Rainier Beach FILE NO. 1450p CITY OF TUKWILA Proposed Annexation (K.C.F.D.;1) WATER DOM/C:73 =A fiRE D/61kicT AZ. s w4r 491 9eeic.T emu ,; 6 L OIREALA noimmer in ►1 4 91► M I Rainier Beach zoAviAU irnex M,qP ezzo p/57 1 4rnfe.gbuep7-- �t RS•7,200 et) •s• zoo .1 oo) 4 ST tt) a 4. M2.400 P U . 0. MI re CO NIP. N9-7,200 101111S ST TT% \ , (eseamo) a. 1131.440er T.'• . (mr , un 5 Ng: Cif M. H • 9S-7200 II i I " s. 7.200 *ZE D/57 Ida S Orn NS. 7 ST olt ) M-H TINS PORTION IS Re MT Of THE NOUNS ARIA MINS 10 304W S 00 RN t S.7,200 00 it M-H RS-7,200 POTMON t S • a Ira most " ZONING AS OF MAY, 1981 23 TNIS PORTION IS su ME MONO( MM /On • M-H 5 .11tS ST • M-H t. nos ■nonok F nof main, P**1 MO zoo ZONING AS OF MAY, 1901 25 112,11 M-H 304E RS- 7,200 1;t13.4 01fA WINCE III M-H P0ITIJ j • 3 • 1 THIS roaroff .s NI ph i : MI NIGKINE mu /044C i E 4-23-4 • RM•2,400 RD.3600 RM• I,600 5 ZRth 115th ST DUWAM/SH "fit/ER 5 110N IS N11 pill j WA ZONING S-R J; � .1IH15 PORTION IS NQT 5 117M ST i ENE HIGHLINE AIIEA S•R L n4r• , T O 200 51' .200 X7200 , N 1 85•7,200 . r a —dm! 1 : I I \'1 v RS :7200 �e IYS, RS -7,200 I- 1 s' • 0, ZONING AS OF MAY, 1961 41 male 1415 PORTION IS Tgl PART 01 THE HTGIQINE AREA I0 , 2SIn M-H 1 4114 7 1T C ii 314 E RS -7200 I.3.401) T � — M-H RIVER RS •7.2C0 \ M-H‘, " R No 599 ~~I v a5. 2CC 1. -MO. 1 4 % .D� I0 I M-HI I M-1-1‘i C -G 'o 4 - N 16 ... ;a. ,.....r•r.r. tan':,,.. ;, .. 10 315 W m M -H THIS PORTION IS go PRE or THE HIGIN,IM AREA 1ORING M-H 5•R M-H E9.23• 1110 -23 -4 S•R R#IIvIRO AW S•R M -H M peon THIS PORTION IS KT PART 01 THE IIGHEINE AREA ZONING M-H 43 • m1 1 a ZONING AS OF MAY, 1981 't': ,: .... � . :� �., t a� yrn w . r . {.�,r:�,T•.ry r + >t•c�n;.se: F ^. . y I M - P 1 MO � 1 i ! , UNCLASSIFIED VIr USE PERMIT M•L PU D \ ,o • ART Or RING S•�t ` 1 yc• S•R .. n.a., <.....,, ...,n %Jre•iiiC;e: ?i >:`i:in .= s.. r.;.C.� Z,:±•S.;:ih: •A" h;: , ^ r .S >... a.... l�: Il��:' 5 ':: 1. J: L�;: vl; .. , . , ,... r.? tJ i2� 5� :�t7`!F..'11 MI,',.*Jt«r5.�, ,'Ll ",?.;tS:i >i:�;xtX?.`.4?; ",. ^�� <r:r n . ,m:Y•>w. — •�•!,•,.r , .• - •vroL +..s, e�x.'.ss+• 6'i 5' ir..•. i. S�Wri- .�.:• " " %;�t..;•,r;, ZONING AS OF MAY, 1981 61 E 15 -23 -4 W14-23-4 ZONING AS OF MAY, 1981 63 �. G4W3k: i; u:: ��riu. ��' iu?:' ve�1{ �' �SL�!:': txs�nSSSxacwvaa�mwoais+ aa : rr.1eruis:121srn:1.=: YV1!-fATtljYa7OuAru' f, Ww=.:,. ktaVRYF: tIIbfdSYSaf :W.9;t8ltx:Tu +'sJ1niIIG.i'"�. +VMA, Tgum's. .atWAt, h37rsG5 ' �1.,"tR.ari r.wAai x�.: CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY OF PETITION (ELECTION METHOD ANNEXATION) I, MAXINE ANDERSON, City Clerk for the City of Tukwila, Washington-, do hereby certify that I have received a Petition for Annexation of an area generally referred to as Fire District #1 from Phyllis K. MacLeod of the Pro - secuting Attorney's Office. Accompanying letter dated January 16, 1987, sta- tes that "Based on the foregoing analysis pursuant to RCW 35A.14.020, we certify the enclosed petition for annexation...." I further certify that I have had the signatures on said petition checked as to validity by the King County Records and Elections Division. Accompanying letter dated January 26, 1987, states "Therefore the signatures of 96 registered voters in the petition exceeds the 10% requirement described in RCW 35A.14.020. SIGNED AND SEALED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1987. CITY OF TUKWILA Maxine Anderson, City Clerk /71,/,744,9L‹,/ . ,.. .,ir ,. .. ....,id -_... ...,�:h:::c..1 �..t: -.. .. .....,,..+,... � J... ,. b,.. , .bd,:..,. ..ro..,.s •e c:: ... ... e'ztMr5.:4;.t-P. �:S- .,,:aN.t ... .. .... ... ... .. ..c ,.... ,s ,. .- ,�. • 'L ,,,Y ^:. `i �a� _, 5:.. z :.. , / KING GO. FIRE PROTECTION . 'D 1ST. k F A04 si 15 e 6/ 1.J N I N Ci AT PIE / P4M 4. e c r i c44 o f N E Ce,.raL,rd E EwK E NIA ,44.14. tiJA1 5 a+ry AND MC IAA: (EN.Y Ee,liecTT4P/ QF MI ric 4.r.s co $ RUSE 5,4E7'; "ThENCZ s. „n+E 0%TE , -'l 4wia .p.€ EC Nt- - L r Mrioc,,NAL. 1041 ; t ^ P w "Tit rc, r ..,..+T hJclot (.,CS . .1,.1bi (.slo 1N' b " war E eLc•A .a ro. "A 4 pv."4.60) Ms G'c.uoMr+j • rl1.•1 0 A bE41NN/NC7 ,FT A tcrNr pro THE Enos' IVO OAr,1 OF- t'er Kist/ /N WAY 5nn. rH, sitar> 7:t ,prr ae'J.d4 No.Ef. 23 wt.r 4 Dvsr•- AN[e OF 35/ Z-f FECr ,ftcb^di **ID M4114/11 F.toM THE /AMA- 66x- ncri of T'/c :an, L.,.,44 OF f M,' ti 4AJ r4s. r Do^ro►nGN 4-11"41) : L 4iH A 5O W f r►4 rNE EA'Sr alrlh'4 /n/ OF C1sr 11044.44. Wm 3, Sourk , 44 AAMAINED a el TrfE - ..r ScruNDRftY oc $oC11.4 FrELD :J.1tD f' ° /fJ-r tSE rv,..Jr OF /NTGKtiG[.Tigry Oa ;,A ,& .j ,+If9f:+:s/14 .4.J /rH rkE Srf ' L.tiE 04 The DuwAtili Klk.4 64. At, tSTr► Et/ COMf3/4E0.4rFlu ent Pe- v uAl rutbOct ►■° t I4 ii i 4LE ir4 Noe% c 23 ` 41 1 0S " t. W..T At...a, tab L►i:.r M t11'L4,N i i� prSTAriLe OC `+6 7 S Gael - To rc .,, r • a" AND L ru nF , �,ntp s- .�.rfrlaH � CIE »CE r &'4c1� . ia.4. m FT tr1T 'A". (ilo er L�,T /t r ) s r M +l.E� TG 1FL Erti(ZK4.'f MAwGt1J OC � 1" r r*AitNtt� v . A S.LIri A Lt retNr.:E CA- 449 1'tt'r ALop44 THE NoRTM1"..,e;TER11 LJN6 o F f 4.L BoF A T Or L.A '4D c'oMJ/EYED 717 FAIDAy INC. 11.1 1.3 .•.r 4 Dov um ire toi-`4 Ft 6.4 n? 5 .uesw ! 1110 Nta:: "ow TM 'L S 41' 0 3 r ' •• /r1T Y 10.4 UL.CL Tp , A it) •ASTJr1c4-4 r.A.:..:,• R LPJSTAnJCt OF 2.54 FEET, THENCE .5o4.41■ 16r 51" Jt`..iT H qt %1 n of ELT To AN /AJME`' �Trort w imry Toe tnSrt.4....4--Y .iA•zr.,fN of �r E./4Sr MM� fr,�k.. W AY ` l.:' ytH ,h,D �•tT[f;,i 4 l;CrNct A N. /..1r 2 91c:r &NAit1ERY CF itos ..A",i THEt+ 'c 'it ,y'Ai.J4 'Salmi 44 8 maw Tr) THE /G CE NTt.1 ' -W of EAST t-44 /r t.11JAT 501,411; r r1E' SOU fNEASTERL ON 1A 'D CF•r1E W.. TO THE 4:Ex1fEk'.L.tf'€ OF CotAni $RR7ON STROM' ENCTE D CD yJ STER4 .Y.; .1' nc <..K.L.F.P.D. ;n:; ^,.jr ,•.S' - Szr�. �:^'"' �i:! i' rr' s. �... vit�iTi�..:.' t�' �, t,,:...<. �..' i' 7' �' i`.+ i�:, ��i'i':::vti.'3.4t��u ?�F=s'.�:`. �:.:`�ii.} :',. . C•.,1 TNENCE E ASTL NG rJt 4N� C��vr,�c�.JE � QF " ti EAKIOP, 5rRE(r To THE L.IE , r meiez /1-4 IIF dot r E* j rl%4Fr_ ►v+u.- lsu�y 1tIGNr- OF -... 7'; THENCE SourtiCRL.1 ^L-oN6 weST x4/10614 QF NoKt HeRN PA IF IC. Rl+t.•-IAY R4►1r -O• -wNf 4".110 flit WE:�TE�L.y cITV LIMITS cF ThE Clri OF SCArn.c, To JxE CE:r+rtRL/.-JE OF, STM • P C 16 rr , 10+14 Kt. r; rAsT 41.4/44 50.4n4 10 SrecE7 r o ` TtIE ".".6 EAbrt 1 / d. ;L..upA+LY of Iiimfotr SUM" 4•IwAy de 2. (ENTIRE I,10■1 C.•ru,+ THENCE s. L.TTi Al.o+u sr1ic eI•TerLL{ MU/40W.Y 4 G2o ^_ F .. E . ET-, ho114 O+L i4766, To THE. t LThEtb..V r•f J J 1. of SC►ATy IOTT►1 .+II— 1 ; THENCE ," 4 W+.4r4E0V,rcrtc.1 D i cTlc 4 AL0,4 SAID NO4R1Ee. .1 MP Al To TNf /Nrif4. CC'flov.r Of 111E &At ar c ,'JE of THE ,..c04 weir [.►•nitrtL OF The 5c1.,711E - 'sr 614fliciEK or StcrtOe4 3, - ra..MSti Ie 23 ts40.44, AN4e 4 Ems,r tJ•M wfTh TIic 1.•O ATM L/A•.E of Sat crw 1O 7M R&F.T, AwwEyeD To $. . C.ot ry, LOSNM6rD,1, 6/ k4 c /..De D u r PcR 4+ti+. FILE a° 3444401; THENCE a/oIZTFr AL OAJ4 fME Ett`..r of SAID 51A8 ,viSI o•J ?4o f•E■" M,)II% CR LEt:., 1O THE; NC.,t1k LI•.E of 5410 6w8DIHIS02.4 ACS 6/4".01 43 Rif fXWV- 4. IIJE C IC4111 TrKEET: TN10E Iorts AL eA.4 ;.rj +Q C €nEla-1 -1NE To,mE Ctiotbalo.c of 51 Z Av &n1uC Sc.I TK 1 H ENC.E $o1.4 Pt A L..N6 5 I u r A. e...I E Sou nl To rHE es.-iTE.►e j, 0E CF 14111 IRTH STULT, 6Ela47 rite No:•I►ItM.,r cr01 OF 5ECTIc d 4 TTI..•5.11P Z3 r'o*Ttr, :Ar4G 4 EA4r, W.M.; THENCE coKiiNK/Nc, Sok* ? 0 14+� 14 -4 rNi: EAST t-,1 t OF SA'D SECric,++ ID. To AN !k►TWASECT1oN • NJST t THE CuoKrH c.,.... aF SJ14 113Ti1 SIRar iserrtTam c4r...tb A •4 SrRcer; WMICA IS A R oN Thr En's c.n,E oF lea SEt.ncN ta&SrgNr 45 F EET SaI+Th f wM i,IC n/orir*+EAST co•r,+E.i oF SA.D SEfar•Io•J, THENCE u tERLY oN rt.e So& •n LINE cF SAID g[RLk7 rp r1+ P TML..- TL iiLi &Owe& or tzar ISI, 8w�1C 1(0 C D ti is AEA Dow G tk.A4 , D 1 D171ooP4 1)1.ry/c 4 N° Z, ,15 iteC.cAtbeD 141 ■k.ohe '4 OF RATS. PAGE vZ. f.EC- :- t::?:,y�'�iM ?it �:.;,:i� v1::.:. o: �R: �d, fi6': T:: SA:; N. r.,; av: us.;: Yr, i�.-; .i ;. ;. s.:.: v- a s„_. v.,..•. w .a..,..- .�.... - Anew • K.0 121. 3L r4 • 1 k�t� w.M., ncC'CE :.:Mill i C +. D. Tt> r,,E rIC► =T -Ie L.r CItl j p: KI/4 Gin.rTj T}IEICE 11171Ek4•1 a.• isAr west' sISE of s4 To ME N[R1ri L-/NG OF 6 n1 I4n Si itt€r ScrIEp•/E3 Cir.LED A4.4 u.4rA SI2 . T AS Pt 1a uJ SA 4o '. a nor1; ¶4Cr10E EA6rE144 ALoNG SAID JJckni '-'ME TO TT Plt, ce•+T CM Llwrrs ow ME E4sr Ir+b OF SAID S C-flc", ;IA /Q; TFiENC1 r _0�1 SAID EAST LIn7E 1b .� A...N r A ?d ' , IMA rEA-Y LWCCI FEET S..td rN c i THE NOjMEASf Cat•+,R SE4T/441 /0 4ND 04 The CEr+1L OF -11d1rEA 57KELr, AtS6 stkrt.••N •s SCiarH IZCrn SrKt ; " 1 NENCt: tASr Aer imnTEt.1 IIc tear To !KC Nor:T•lrtE PrZoDMLr10.4 QF ME CiNTirK I,.+rs oF .°-i � A LA. efr(rDwN ACRE 41.. S, 41.. & ` 1�E CD Vot.r•A 13 OF et.sm_ 'PALE 22, Z•'> ; cF Koa6CDIA T11r?4CE Zol,114t:41..1 A 1...•.4 5e •D NocT elL/ i'1t+LrC1lI..a +ND SAID GGw.Tt:i4 of SA•O 1.co" 3 Tc+, A•4 IA./1Mt- Et-71•4 W I n•1 T C tcirrei .'NE OF 5 TA1 • t: it• N • .; THENCE 01,Tn+Eils tio, A t-vn.• :•+, r+ czezt To t:4 TT w OF THE No rO4 A/ U.)MIH CtNTt14 •46. of `sE, CT1 I,, - r-y. L�N• r p A,..c.4. 4 E., Awr44 :w+I c r rc+.c TN At-4.1) 5c» Tb CENTS*: 17;4..4 LINE ro.Tt,tt :.. +Nt of Sv, tp 140 nr1 STrFEr; THENCE Wt.TL. Y MID I.J es' 1C-1t' .j r zoyOittltLY L INE OF �I..TN NOn•1 S rKLCT AL . KMnIriN A� I'.G+tidN &i11.. M1h1£ LICE a F r►it 1 tlbT RArt.ct,AD; 1 L'4CE .)t■TH•E-trTc h:CY Al 1r11V wTtit LINE TO INC crXle&.s. OF (path aycNt4G 54,141■ (.4;p S(,OwJ 45 cuharf I`j••o � J° t 5TcLc if tiiolw.w:R moo); TH6 1 ywt:.:.it IZ1-J oast CG" rLRL 1446~ TD THE CL 'TEILLINE of I<tw�••v e•k. Ii +NE 4 (41, tar, sinaikupJ AS SIC N +a• RoAO, Lot.�A k AJV b 4••41) N 0?-04B), 45 :01#1.440 a1 WIC "warm/ft >rl t,s,Ir1 IC .5.4* g, �utT' Ju L.4 MC 12 or nArs, rheA .75 KI NG THENCE NoK H4.1d3rERJ.Y /tor.* .D RAJ t' 'AC eso FEET Molts: ca LE•oy To l?N /NT£ #- 56 c n orJ „tJ I tN !kE Eoh/E Y 67 Ter., noA• of fl+E • C4,.ntM .IM6 c1F E /v Plot D A uts/•r4e CNew R :,16T11 131 Tq S114i1:1 Its /I ATIE �•., „ r��, .:Yi :' r •�;.: :;:,:.• +2••- r•: a;. . 'a:�+- �cne:S:•G�: ;'� " ":"f:3:F....fSr��;? �++. ,<.K.;J.�5i4c „�ds uw..., a: �...,, .,..- „r..:r.!::��,:axrr:+G;xx�; ra.�xa„a�,,:,,�. ,:s�:..,w,...., :-;�; cr,:s�. ...af�on �. � .v.. i•�:a�, :>,s ;2 c fw C /11. IA 1'11 IN CJ H•II►+Awf ►.TTd -E GnRTiW Tit , 4 Rec cape, 11 of p , , P4c.E• 24, c4 I o. y. D Ex rt+v Trw • �,Z FtEr 'Acme at Lei m 11 :.-L,TM..•Q..r`T•c•+.A.1 0 GF 'WE !�o•trrt'L�+ QAc.,C.c ��+way Moan cF•w4r 4c-a Beet DC. EW0K-TIUtL.1 ,, VC 4. 050 Pee. uc4.....4. Ems'. •.ti,c '5 , Vo,....••c b'L I, Pk.E 24.5 oc Dews, (.,A: .l L f Rtc...;T:s :s K4.44 vrts•cb.,c ?•,:,./ GF Th6 +.vkn+cm.rc.►+... - n1E4 CE N THE/CE annTVVVVWW:MTZMCWWZMinNa2=rjggfr50: 141.6.44 4' D MnKu•N =MCC rGr.T woke o•I 1• TNC 4.Crr L,.+C OF The hi 41 /1..rr.r % orr `rtCi o/4 I IN 'ZNd,to T234, RAE, I►J.,4•; THEACE nwnw '$610 .4 c.1r 1. • 120 FCET Ka c� L L TD THE /144t.041) OF 1hC �u►+ANA S$ f•• ) � 1{�C.E 4-4J NO GdI 1 H 44..A0 'N A Dig. cno.J Tp 6 THE r•c•d w,r1♦ nJ o knl 4i4t5ry fi'f ME McMt4 "4 p T bL•1GT - &t G.1+ZDe../.1 Tw.At.rb AC4.4.11:9,n•4 TD a irr R EccdDey .•,� �OLMMt 1 G I�ATS, ?Ale 19, •nl K•• T•r 1I11A5hIN410M; Tt1EMC- UG•�l1�wt�TE1� -� . 41;) Piocvcr7oN D bA•� 1hg4 Re5r'c1n.cL1, TO n,ar.aS.47� •/ l PH Mi 4/41144 /A.) off 57r Artn.aE f.wuni; MENCE ALIp^.47 WI ID 641.4thL.•l'ilE"(ZLy Meif.4 /4 To THE ?A D -Lcali 4 of nit NWP∎4En!ra:•s AAA tl,•.1 of Tiucr SI u” yt,D rIAT; THE4JCE MCAThu.E:.rt•.►.y ALONG 3460 beIATM nlre++ir rr421341,7fvN 01 31 'D NokIHFJ1'.TEX,t.71 MIfP..1/ TD T7 Su►.rTyc •r�r MAI:f,••N of 5(v of A rcN.lE So.4 r f ; THENCE 544 rn - wt brr.Jv AC•AJ6 s.I Sim aldif a y no Aec.'Ai rD 7kE S ) L 4 k)ESP /Lf (, / of Sisk pi I3 Sou Sri 'r; 7JAC:EE swmrris riar44 ALL.N m SOurnlwt 4w01/40/ of .� �JL 11� /33.e) • 4' J1aCii.T Aral) 7HC S , NrNErtS.rtiLLy re4..) n a" Tileg4,4" 'A OW c /rc.a p rwat�.No of 1 V �uwr#wa'W1 K #E.I. i TENCE rlcc.4o sAaD 1HIc,4D ..I A o& ' 4'4C KL/ 0,44C rro.d ro The- ) re .4 c. r•c c..„Iy PIE - , !..n►rtleek,IC"r►c 1 r_ * jLNT /aW OF 774C £x124.1 4 in! 00 a ....r0 tD SrP4L ET , AS 1 ../ 1114.c.r.1otuN A J, n onl A• Ktc.:.rcyEO r,.+ Vot.c.wtf a O F P..RTS 711C, E tC) REC.c4D5 C F K.•44 6)1.4 P THENCE noRTtt �1wn,G ��► aiut► the.+iTe at., E •rrei „ rroN 4..,• 'AID 'Witt Thic. E44y MA•v••• lOSO FEET r4o44 ro 'N aMEQx -c-n wino 1Ntc nco14.T• w "rt:1 tIMI of cor 3Z Cic:•crc. 13, &A,D 444.0.11A,ual A•o410.4; T*NCE Lour►A rtt.unl• JA 040 L r�lt HND TNG" 5.- 64ri1a+eSTL&<, 1 E 711E,aeoF 7D 7 144gr.H■ aF INC 114,: rtn,tus Ka& TF E wesrC.u.y hi.0N4,/ :.A.D 'iH ACM 0 r 2150 Geer .IA:AC olt To • A Pb,•r OrPc.•a,TE T++C wurti we OP Titik.r 33, R►VERS 1■41> 11a4v4 r I K *C TS, r_N,•:Ec o.c o t o/ ( Th EPICr a.;E`ar 1D rrC a •ter c..14- OF 2 t►at r M4a.r .1or E.rc.r•:.c 4,4 „m +Y r 'teare of -WAY ; T1.1E»CE .Jua�sr 4 - ri r, W /MC wets t.. ...•t p D,r.D a C�VKr- •�F -.0 AY Ad ► Ali4y t► FaEr ►o A ft. “.4.1 cPPcb,rr rME a:u.M a..w.as OC h 22, aF o K ,z:.,Df rod >E.44 tI A • "ruticm, THENCE w€ 1000 FT r w K 1G 1tsG CAir+rGRun.E •F 1►1E . P+c:. Frc. a ✓Alf • 't.'.c� at..+ow.d AS - . ✓ t E.t-. r AdItt►..cv,Nilt. 6v :ntD1 Xl, o '?o. nrr 9t.:aG bCrr, , al The tt. ,n.F, [1F .� rlfDi 124 Tli_ �+W.LXT ' IJ� ct tto 1. ; rt. R1 1- li 3 wtS.,e1 . 1 LAM. ZA.fl c:Ent ILK*. thit:: To The; ATS664.1 Pltcs.d 4 r}TI wa cF rllE wssr a=.E OF 8 pp -A 2, l�,..t p,i ADDino#4. +•4),,..4 TC r‘.•+r THEaiEOC le.,t14•RDtD ,14 JCC.awcar 13 oC PLATS, 1--'.i4.16 &o r cP r' a•kt. C & rl , V.4611 14 ra4; THENCE' NogTh ter AWN* bit .D 1../Me .Ir+D IT•S Se1 'Mtio4.on44AncN fc The NoI Gni?"tK OF. 5A ∎D BL4x:v ; - TTE/4cC Nc i .n i Au .Y. TH EAST L , NE GF' ril- a.J ,r 82D . ,......,.. .C.a,. \'4�. e.a,..,.v.,.._.. . • ...n +x - • • '$3 . t-5 to “,rt. FctT of 5+►1D %tc41o• 10 Tv P N: ,!.l "g" Dr•t�'.a�Ffl As � f • Ce., ,0.4,41 , 44C, 0+1- (H( wt:•r 41.4 AS re R. Call iER OC - 10; ThENGE" t %n+ ,14 .o 14 . , c, 1'1 i. f cf• r ftic TC r, N 'J,Mc'4,„n1r 1+01146D A■•...r I0, f%0 ,QDtD w•.or.IL rLin11.•s F,►.t /J° U3528; 11 car /440.14 SS Sai& ns J•AAR4 624) Fe.eT; TEtiCE s.•.. 421.15 F4.4 r TO W•..4r "CV D ♦: , l G c F U.0 , , PT ON ' I E 4 2 c A r P 14•LA1,1 -,E1- To TN NuKTil 4, NE OF 601/04MA Lor IS To 1 CENTERLINE 0 C - t wK +1ar tikili ..NA 11JAi :.r►1 Y4 �) - o r N 1NC r «. T'lf.._NGt SteelT�1 MA4,,..3 fir 4.4 E*SneCNr 611.4a4T>`D E TMC &CCr 4,..1d THE44:Ce 1 EJJCE N. 1t r ML a y A�.vu4 s4 � e, l/ 3;10yG 4' L-r4r Ih CPj(, 1 HG ^ 4 , "' at - • - -1 NIL F:.t- 11. C. OF E r - z NSA r2c.is t . - ►� �'� t a. -n ti iari : �{ E - ,�10 ►h►1e • III C. , w , � *P CpNJC�L.Nt n.� 104g �•$ r �.-de oF PiE �.w1A,«I•,•�l i. ...;E.144. 1 i$r..L A,(44:Stie -y 41,, Ens t.: PIE .D4.4 4s, Pi•.4,511 1` 9rd D k) Are i w *i TO 'ME NLt,►L ' eV Pi & L i e $1K6ET, «7(IC44Dc D & 6 5 t 41 FAL y; THE/JCE tAs7 440N4a TrfC ei;4arE•.c..n1E OC • Ro de S/i.ECT; Ehrcovoilb, To F■ 1p-1T of e,e_[,•NN s•Jci EXGEpr LNTS 7, 8 *■lb �, dw• r, 2Z, Cs .r�,t�N•��'s MtAt.i,,., 64,40.:•.s 1) All s„ All 3, oit,(e« 41,6 .r1 144-44A'C r eiep ��i? ices, or ^.. r I Lc4.,al. Kc• 69-1 4rok.11 ro rtE AD ,• oQr:.s. ft D.►:ECT'or•1. V1/414 . r rt e ( EQlc.. La.LF 41 C 3C 31.4. 1?K4 Cug. 30 ri i9Fs4 Z a. •i 9F ,1 J _ Government attached to said 1 portions of 9 East, W.M. , y; rly along 474.74 said feet to therly along said west • • • -. . • j x q.rf .4i!2i4. Alin , ` ` , A ict t t act of land comprised of Lnat portion of Boeing Field /King County Inter — t tonal Airport property located•ogtside of the Seattle City limits, situated ;..action 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and •... ton 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian in King County, de•cribed• as follows: \t t., I 1, . , , L. t• e � 1 e ;\ ; t J i' • - t4••ltnninq at the Northeast corner of Section 4, Township 23 North, b.t.. ;.' 4 East, Willamette Meridian, then along the Easterly border of sail Lection 4 which is also the Seattle City URIC Line baiting `..•uth U ° 20'OS" West 1256 feet, more or less, to the Northerly margin ..f SAJu N rtolk Street; n North 88 ° 3b' ' j,sst- 35 feet ; th !} A yi . � i1'f est; Wen North °1 .6 •rasa+ West O l Tset; then :,outs e+si 'Mp a' West S96,61. f eet; then South 89 West e].JS feet to • point on the Easterly margin of East Marginal Way South; then following said margin North 23 41.00• West 1373.66 feet; then ;..,,th 89 50" East 380 islet; then North 150 feet; then North ta• West 456.27 feet; then North 23 ° 40'59• West 84.67 feet; then t,..rth 69 ° 58'17" East 518.49 feet; then North 29 ° 52'38" West 372.42 feet; 89 West 474.62 feet to the Easterly margin of East m.,ryinal Way South; then along said margin North 23 ° 41'02" West feet; then North 66 ° 18'58" East 149 feet; then North 23 ° 41'02" west :59 feet; then South 66 West 149 feet to the Easterly margin rat 1. marginal Way South; then along said margin North 23 ° 41'02" West ".t..`.2 feet; then along a curve to the left having • radius of 2914.92 tt'e•t. a chord of 1278.21 feet and an arc distance of 12811.68 feet; then rdr.rth 49 West 643.39 feet to the North line of Section 33, 'R•.wnship 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line South 89 ° 17'40" last 668 feet, more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed of the Duwamish River; then following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line. • distance of approximately 3400 feet to the North t.. ;.Je•r of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, ka.► 4 Last, Willamette Meridian; then along said Section border %.r,ich also is the Seattle City Limit Line South 88 ° 32'07" East lb'1; feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; then along said margin South 17 East 199 feet, more or less; then South 21 West 25 feet; then also along the Westerly rn.Lrgin of Airport Way South, South 17 ° 32'ld" Last 1ti51 feet; more ur less, to the Easterly border of Section 33, Township 24 North, l..inge 4 East, Willamette Meridian; then along said Lasterly border, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line 6t15 feet, more or less. to the POIfrr OF BEGINNING; said tract of land contains an area of approximately 165 acres. IL. � - p 1 -:5 -171 n1 ♦ ' e !: . �•a tl' a �.1., Jef frey W. Winter, 'E. C / i S4 rik„ . t‘c CI r ` 7t ? L ,► L. )r.- -4-s.f / v.-.•e 1 c � / & i r .; g r,. .:tHSw: t �g't:,: �N V'^,: :VAV' ,: r, .? tr .3;, j . }to"0.r: ,.3' > '. ?lam' !!T� >v! -v V;�Y !Y' rA _, l' %'.fiMr' 1. .� .y.�y�.� y� 4.. S 4 � [� >; f �, } � -r • /� �¢ Ar ..� •rM•' .1 1 • "�L t"` t �• ..V.• °,i(.m' tl..� l` �iS� ,.t » ,i! �' 1�� . l '. 7,ri 1 y,WY YU;A_ ^:S. 1'.`�_- !i..•� . �,.�,_ !�'. any.+. �.: s... u' 9.1'` �:;ik ^:1iu31,`FY.cix`1.•.CL4'. 4ivll, �aLS �S.., y; wF:. t: �M1i anY>1 2A.,. r...-•. iiL�J3.. f..,:..,•. �: �r.... l': C.;.. ls', t' i, ��. �C•._. sn.. �:.• �,` ��Sn.. s�v! iv.. c..._.. �: b.... r,..., 1�'.:. ��tFnk. �+ �. c4. a.. aC. .,.e.. .. ..�v_�..�r3..�- L.wx.. ��f�..+ _�.n_''G.r`r.�4 {,.11.7�°.}K.fdw . .s�.`: %!. `+ a tcs .40 w51 KI!v, CO. Fra Mal r.+�:.1w::TON 260t Rs* 21 • P G CO. PPE PRCTEC4V"^ DIST. NQ I t• '. CO F P D NO II 1\ ■ t coon unrr SCALE S 113 °St 4? S MT'S C0 RATING Z REVISION NO 10 WASNINGTON SURVEYING AND RATING BUREAU 3 mippixer P(ACrr *m6 FaOTECTION CL ASS MCAT ION OF COMMuNITY - CL.6 l 1 ) S 1DO' St s , to m St Q 4 -1 41, .?r of .f •0-A7r tea.. 4 O4 tig Citi-of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 City Council 433-1800 H.W. Haynes Executive Vice President Chief Financial Officer Boeing Corporate Headquarters P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 CS:nb January 27, 1987 Subject: Fire District No. 1 Petition for Annexation The residents of Fire District #1 recently filed a petition for annexation to the City of Tukwila. The petition and the signatures must first be certified to be valid. Next, to help analyze the impacts on the City and the businesses, an environmental impact statement (EIS) will be done. Public hearings will be held to assess the feelings of the business community as well as of the residents. The City Council then votes on accepting the annexation. Finally, the state - appointed Boundary Review Board (BRB) reviews the petition and votes to accept or deny the annex- ation. These steps may take up to a year before an annexation actually takes place. However, the first step has been taken and we'll do what we can to move quickly on the rest. Our City's policy on annexation is quite clear. It states that annexations of land contiguous to our City boundaries are encouraged. For some time we have looked forward to getting the District's petition for annexation, so we were pleased to receive it. I'll be glad to talk with you about any comments or questions you may have. My number at work us 773 -1762, at home 244 -7127, and I can also be reached at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188. This annexation will have important and lasting impacts on both Tukwila and you. Your positive or negative opinions should be voiced. The communica- tion lines are always open so please feel free to get in touch. Best wishes for your business in the New Year. Sincerely, J .yi >'.. ,r„e :�lii �:= %�.t�v...µ. 'f °� ri'S3 `.... T: . 7 ..:.u� O. �:f. ... Charlie Simpson Tukwila City Council City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 INTRODUCTION - MAYOR GARY VAN DUSEN Reason for seeking action 1. Petition initiated - Tukwila received in December 1986 a petition for election, signed by 96 voters out of 872 registered, requesting the annexation of the area described as Fire District No. 1. a. Actions taken: FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION CITY OF TUKWILA PRESENTATION TO THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD - Issued a Determination of Significance - Hired a broad -based skilled team of consultants to prepare a comprehensive analysis of proposal. CCA, inc. - economic. finance and policy analysts, led the team which also included TDA - transportation experts; Hugh Goldsmith Associates - utility engineers; and Linda Stalzer Associates - land use planning. The scope of the study included both the physical environment and the fiscal /service impacts to Tukwila and other affected agencies. - Worked with residents and businesses in the area through com- munity meetings and a task force formed of the same to address issues of concern and land use planning for the area. 2. Historical precedent (Issue has been ongoing since 1974) a. June 1974 - petition for annexation election of area described as Fire District No. 1 filed with Tukwila. b. BRB reviews in November 1974 and modifies area. c. Tukwila declines placing on ballot due to lack of information on impacts of smaller modified area. d.. Febru• ' 1978 - petition for annexation election filed with Tukwila for the Duwamish, Allentown, and Foster Point neighborhoods. e. January 1980 - BRB approval is appealed by King County Fire District No. 1, which is dismissed by Superior Court for prejudice. f. September 1983 - Election fails, 60 for /97 against, primarily due to concern over Fire District service and personnel. B. Relationship to surrounding area 1. West of subject proposal 2. Other annexations City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 2 C. Outline of presentation II DESCRIPTION OF AREA A. Approximately 1,600 acres, 1,900 residents, and 20,000 employees. Per capita and density figures would tend to be misleading because of the diversity and uniqueness of several neighborhoods in the area. The average asseessed valuation per capita for the area is $246,478; by sub -area, #2 - $24,882, #3 - $28,124, and #4 - $67,787. B. Neighborhoods (see DEIS Figure 2, page 6 & Board) 1. Sub -Area 1 a. Land use - Urban Activity Center - (see DEIS Figure 7, page 24) - industrial, commercial, and public airport. b. Population - 1 single - family home c. Street circulation - East Marginal Way - 5 -lane arterial; Boeing Access Road - 5 -lane arterial access to I -5. 2. Sub -Area 2 a. Land use - primarily low- density residential b. Population 331 (17 %) c. Street circulation - South Ryan Way leads from I -5, a 4 -lane major arterial to "T" intersection of 51st Avenue South, which is a 2 -lane collector arterial. 3. Sub -Area 3 a. Land Use - mix of heavy industrial and commercial, and high- density residential. b. Population 543 (29 %) - 2/3 live in Empire Estates 240 -unit complex c. Street circulation - Empire Way South, 5 -lane State highway bor- ders the site. Access is also provided via South 129th 2 -lane collector arterial from Allentown which intersects with Empire Way. 68th Avenue provides access from the south through Renton. 4. Sub -Area 4 a. Land use - mix of low - density residential and light and heavy Industrial. b. Population 1,026 (54 %) - single- family owner - occupied housing c. Street circulation - East Marginal Way continues from north industrial area through to Tukwila and I -5 access. Interurban Avenue proceeds from Tukwila to intersection with East Marginal Way, also intersects with 42nd Avenue bridge leading into Allentown. City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 3 C. Growth 1. PSCOG projects slight decline in residential population (.5 percent) 2. Slight increase projected to year 2000 in number of employees. D. Topography - (see DEIS Figure 6, page 14 & Board) 1. Duwamish River Basin 2. Black River Basin E. Special Purpose Districts 1. Sewer - (see DEIS Figure 18, page 90 & Board) a. Val -Vue b. Seattle c. Renton d. Unsewered areas 2. Water - (see DEIS Figure 19 & Board) a. #25 (unfranchised) b. #125 c. Seattle d. Creston 3. School - (see Board) a. South Central b. Renton c. Seattle 4. Fire - (see Board) F. Tukwila Annexation Areas (see map handout & Board) - Annexation Policies (Attachment F) support and encourage annexations contiguous to the City's boundaries. Petitions for annexation election received and scheduled for February elections: 1. Riverton 2. Foster 3. Thorndyke III PROCESS / APPROACH A. Assembled a 900 - address mailing list - 7 mailings to date. B. Held two scoping /information meetings in September 1987 at Duwamish Fire Station and Rainier View Community Club. City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 4 C. Assembled an annexation task force of residents, businesses, and a Tukwila Planning Commissioner to review issues and impacts with City staff and make recommendations. D. Land use open houses at Duwamish Fire Station and Rainier View Community Club in December 1987. E. Completed a Draft Environmental Impact Statement on proposal and held a public hearing February 1988. F. Issued a FEIS in March 1988. G. Held two public hearings before Tukwila Planning Commission and two public hearings before City Council, and then adopted ordinances to: 1. Amend City's Comprehensive Plan (Attachment 2) to include the subject area in Planning Area and provide land use designations. 2. Provide pre- annexation zoning and Tukwila Zoning Code amendments to maintain comparable zoning (Attachment 3). H. Met with officials from Boeing Field to address noise code concerns, and adopted amended legislation to provide compatibility with airport operations (Attachment 4). I. Provided an informational question- and - answer brochure for potential annexees. (Handout) IV ISSUES / IMPACTS A. Service 1. Police Currently have a level of urban police protection comparable with other cities, and provide a full range of services - traffic enforcement, crime protection, D.A.R.E., gambling and narcotic investigations. 2. Fire Due to configuration of proposal, an additional patrol district and officers are proposed. Fire District has a 10 -year contract signed in April 1987 with Tukwila to provide the District with fire protection, prevention and public education service. Its employees have become a part of the City's civil service system. No change is currently proposed. 3. Park Facilities and Recreation Services Many of the City's parks will be centrally located to the annexation area. The Community Center is located in the north end of Tukwila two blocks from Interurban Avenue and the 42nd Avenue bridge. Recreation programs are open to all citizens, whether in the City or County. Fees are charged for classes and athletic leagues, with most youth and senior citizens programs free. Additional van service for seniors and recreational brochure mailings will be made available to any annexed area. The Duwamish /Green River Trail that's partially completed in Tukwila would continue on through the annexation area. Foster Golf Course and Fort Dent are large City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 5 4. Other Municipal Services B. Utilities 1. Critical Water Supply Study 2. Sewer - areas not covered within a service area would be included in Tukwila's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. If service by a special purpose district'is more logical, maintenance and operations would be turned over to a District. 3. The remainder of the existing utility purveyors would continue with no change. 4. City Light's service area extends down into the City of Tukwila. They have expressed a concern about the fiscal impact due to the City's undergrounding ordinance. In practice, undergrounding is implemented in new streets. In these instances, contractual agreements may be made with the developer. On street improvement projects, Tukwila pays for the cost of undergrounding. C. Fiscal regional facilities that provide convenience and reduced fees for Tukwila residents. The Tukwila Parks and Open Space Plan is budgeted for updating and the annexation area will be included if annexed. Analysis of impacts and costs of expanding existing services (such as street maintenance, surface water maintenance, engineering, planning and permitting services) have been made and folded into the fiscal analysis. a. Intent is to resolve overlapping service areas and illogical purveyor boundaries, and to encourage municipal service in appropriate annexation areas. b. Timing of recommendations - a draft plan is being reviewed, implementation measures and map of study area are attached (Attachment 5). c. Recommendation is for Tukwila to assume majority of Water District #25's service area. Annexation will allow customers of water utility to participate and vote for their representatives. 1. Based on an in -depth analysis of the revenues generated and the costs of operations and maintenance, the subject area can be adequately served by the City. The City of Tukwila currently has a $22 million debt capacity limit for general purposes, not including utilities or parks. This will increase to approximately $30 million after annexation. This capacity is capable of covering the projectjected capital improvements in the area (See DEIS, Table 17, page 99). 2. King County (see DEIS Table 18, page 102) - Over $1 million loss in revenue, with savings in road maintenance costs and capital improvement programs. Net loss averages $471,000 to $683,000. 3. King County Rural Library System receives operating revenues from a property tax levy on unincorporated properties, and contracts with various municipalities. Tukwila currently pays $19.53 per capita to City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 6 the system. Under current terms of our contract, the library system would suffer a loss of $163,265. Mitigation through a revised contract along with analysis of other pending annexations is proposed. 4. Other jurisdictions - Loss of potential revenues would occur with Seattle who previously proposed annexing south to 104th Street and who provides sewer and water service to area. $375,252,400 in assessed valuation 80% of Fire District. Loss of potential revenues would occur to Renton and the loss of a portion of their planning area which extends to 68th Avenue South. The entire Sub -Area 3 has $15,271,800 or 3% of total. D. Tax lot splits - (See Attachment 6) 1. The existing Seattle boundary splits several tax lots. The proposal, because it abuts the Seattle limits, would perpetuate the splits. a. North Boeing building - request modification b. Associated Grocers c. 51st Avenue South (single - family homes) - request modification d. 56th Place South (single - family homes) - request modification e. Rainier Bank f. Airport E. Unincorporated islands /perimeter boundary (see Attachment 7) 1. Lots 7, 8 and 9, Block 22 of C.D. Hillman's Meadow Gardens Addition, Division No. 3 - Harry Peterson, resident and owner, signed a petition to be included in the annexation. 2. Airport Way - 2,000 feet of County road and railroad right -of -way. Airport Way is a Seattle road for its entire length except for this one spot. 3. Island at approximately 9120 East Marginal Way - Fire District No. 1 legal description was not a perimeter description. When property was added to District, edges never met at this location. 4. 16th Avenue (colored board) - 1,600 feet of 16th plus small segments of Orr, Rose, Southern, 12th, 14th, and half of Dallas Street in an island of land between the City of Seattle and the left bank of the Duwamish River. In reviewing modifications to proposal, it did not seem logical to include the area. V KING COUNTY ANNEXATION POLICIES A. PI -302 The County, through its Comprehensive Plan, supports growth and annexations within City boundaries to assure adequate facilities and service. COMMENT Annexation would assure adequate service and facilities to the area. City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 7 B. PI -303 The County has pledged itself to an active role in municipal annexations, supporting them when consistent with land use plans. C. PI -304 County has established a policy of developing agreements for future annexation areas. VI SUMMARY COMMENT The annexation is consistent with land use plans which show this area as urban and therefore better served by a municipality. COMMENT County is in process of hiring staff to handle an interlocal on Fire District No. 1. When we received this annexation petition in 1986, we at the onset determined to: - Respect the wishes of the petitioners for the boundary - Carefully analyze the impacts - Go through an extensive citizen involvement process - Address head -on the issues that come up Our annexation policy is favorable to annexation petitions and to long -term growth of the City to the north, northwest and west. Fire District No. 1 is a logical extension of that policy. It is an urban area that has been the subject of several annexation attempts. The physical boundaries we are recommending make sense and form an area we can serve, either with existing facilities or in cooperation with existing service providers in the area. We recognize that interlocal agreements may be required and we have been prepared to immediately begin those negotiations. We are committed to providing urban services to the District and have studies those costs. The revenues generated in the District and its costs will very likely balance out once annexation occurs. Community and task force meetings give us a good feel for the affected neighborhoods. Individuals in the area identify with the Fire District. This annexation will continue that association. As many of the boundary irregularities as possible have been resolved in our recommendation. We prioritized respecting the wishes of the community for the boundary in our approach. This is an urban area which King County policy designates for annexation and for provision of services by a city. We feel we are the most logical city to serve Fire District No. 1. We are committed to that service: witness our existing 10 -year contract with the District for mutual fire service and the integration of the two fire departments. Therefore, based upon 18 months of an extensive public involvement process with the District and 14 months of experience with a reciprocal Fire Department contract, we found that the annexation of the District to Tukwila makes sense and conforms to the objectives of the BRB. This annexation also conforms to the long -term objectives of the community. This annexation is within the long -term interest and policy of the City. It should be annexed as recommended. City of Tukwila Presentation Fire District No. 1 Annexation to the Boundary Review Board Page 8 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Tukwila Annexation Policies 2. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance 3. Pre- Annexation Zoning Ordinance 4. Noise Amendment Ordinance 5. Critical Water Supply Study Excerpts 6. Tax Lot Splits 7. Islands (26 /FDl.PRES1 -3) CITY OF TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLICIES Adopted by Resolution No. 992, Passed March 3, 1986 1.0 GENERAL STATEMENTS ON ANNEXATION 1.1 The City of Tukwila strongly encourages annexations within its planning area and contiguous to the City boundaries. COMMENTS: For purposes of planned growth and fiscal responsibilities, Tukwila should, for the immediate future, consider annexations within the planning area and adjacent special use districts. 1.2 The City of Tukwila will freely make available to persons /areas interested in annexation any information related to its taxes or services. Each annexation process should emphasize public information and clear commu- nication among the Tukwila community, City government and the area under consideration. COMMENTS: Upon request, City Council members, the Mayor, and other appro- priate persons as designated by the Mayor will be available to attend meetings, provide information and explain the City's annexation policy. 1.3 Tukwila and King County should work together through interlocal agreements to implement coordinated local policy which will provide municipal serv- ices. COMMENTS: Specific annexation proposals have a greater chance of success if they are coordinated with local policy and receive support from other jurisdictions. 1.4 An annexation report shall be presented to the City Council for all annexa- tions. Major annexations should include a thorough study /assessment of the area under consideration, a financial report analysis, and a plan for meeting the area's service needs. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that Tukwila has an appropriate assess- ment of the annexation area. This will include the potential costs and benefits to the community, consideration of any exist- ing Capital Improvement Plans and, when necessary, a plan for providing municipal services to the area. This approach is intended to make the annexation process smoother and more predictable. 2.0 METHOD OF ANNEXATION The most appropriate means to accomplish annexations may be either an election or a petition, depending upon the size of the area and the number of property owners involved. COMMENTS: With few property owners involved, the petition method is gener- ally easier. With many property owners involved, the election method may be the easier. 3.0 SIZE OF ANNEXATION AREAS 3.1 The City allows and encourages annexation regardless of the size of the area. COMMENTS: The City has an open arms policy toward annexation. 3.2 Tukwila encourages annexations of a sufficiently large size for efficient processing and provision of municipal services. COMMENTS: Annexations of all sizes will help Tukwila grow and reach its planning area boundaries. Larger annexations are generally a more efficient means to bring territory into Tukwila's juris- diction. City of Tukwila Annexation Policies Page 2 4.0 ANNEXATION COSTS 4.1 Tukwila will pay the basic costs of the annexation process including admin- istration, environmental threshold determination, and filing fees. If an annexation requires an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Tukwila will consider assuming the costs on a case -by -case basis. COMMENTS: Tukwila hopes to encourage annexations by taking on the routine costs of annexation. EIS work can be very costly and Tukwila will consider each case individually. 4.2 Assuming Tukwila's bonded indebtedness shall be considered on a case -by- case basis. COMMENTS: The general purpose facilities developed for any bond issue provide services for all Tukwila and any area joining Tukwila through annexation. Different tax rates which foster different service expectations among citizen groups should be avoided. ** NOTE ** The Committee recommends that indebtedness be refinanced as general obligation thereby eliminating the bonded indebtedness issue from annexation consideration. 5.0 BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY The boundaries of the City are a result of petitioners' actions and what- ever form they take is of little significance. COMMENTS: The City will need to develop its plans on how to best service an area regardless of the City's boundaries. 6.0 SERVICE 6.1 The City should maintain service levels for Tukwila's existing citizens when new areas are considered for annexation. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that the present service levels to residents and businesses will not be diminished because of annexation. 6.2 The City should provide for facilities and services for newly annexed areas according to the following guidelines: - First, to maintain existing facilities and services. - Second, to upgrade existing facilities and services to Tukwila standards; - Third, to provide new facilities and services to support planned growth. COMMENTS: This policy will provide a consistent basis for identifying needs and setting priorities to furnish facilities and services in a newly annexed area. 6.3 Tukwila should determine whether or not to assume management of fire, sewer, or water districts in annexation areas on a case -by -case basis subject to the requirements of RCW 35.13A. COMMENTS: Tukwila's planning areas include portions of several special purpose districts providing water, sewer, and fire services. In light of the individual factors pertaining to the operation of each, the decision to assume administration should be made on a case -by -case basis. City Council members, the Mayor, and other appropriate persons as designated by the Mayor should contact the affected special purpose districts. 7.0 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS (EMPLOYEES) The City will retain the employees of special purpose districts when it assumes the ownership and administration of the district. (26 /ANNEXPOLI1,2) City of Tukwila Annexation Policies Page 3 COMMENTS: There is presently state law requiring this. The State RCW reads as follows: "35.13.A.090 - Employment rights of district employees. When- ever a city acquires all of the facilities of a water district or sewer district, pursuant to this chapter, such a City shall offer to employ every full time employee of the district who is engaged in the operation of such a district's facilities on the date on which such city acquires the district facilities. When a city acquires any portion of the facilities of such a dis- trict, such a city shall offer to employ full time employees of the district as of the date of the acquisition of the facili- ties of the district who are no longer needed by the district. "Whenever a city employs a person who has employed immediately prior thereto by the district, arrangements shall be made: (1) For the retention of service credits under the pension plan of the district pursuant to RCW 41.04.070 through 41.04.110; (2) For the retention of all sick leave standing to the employee's credit in the plan of such district; (3) For a vacation with pay during the first year of employment equivalent to that to which he would have been entitled if he had remained in the employment of the district. (1971 1st ex.s. c 95 §9.)" 8.0 PLANNING AND ZONING 8.1 The land use proposed for an area to be annexed should be consistent with Tukwila's adopted Comprehensive Plan Policies and other land use require- ments. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that zoning for annexation areas shall be determined both according to Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and in consideration of existing uses in the area. 8.2 Tukwila should consider simultaneous zoning for annexations on a case -by- case basis. COMMENTS: Simultaneously adopting the zoning designation for the annexa- tion area and the annexation itself will provide predictability for the City of Tukwila, property owners, and residents involved in an annexation action. 8.3 In newly annexed areas, buildings and facilities which do not comply with Tukwila's zoning and other code requirements shall be considered noncon- forming uses. COMMENTS: Designating nonconforming uses in newly annexed areas will ensure that they are treated the same as existing nonconforming uses in Tukwila. WHEREAS, significance prepared and 33SIC2/392A I. �S City Clerk of the City of Tukwila, do certify that this is a true end correct copy of the original on file with the City. D TED this L.4Fday of �; , 19. City Clerk CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO.. Nt t AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area, at some future time, will be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, parts of said area are within the City's planning area and therefore subject to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, existing ordinance nos. 1118 and 1138 provide for land use planning and zoning regulation for two parts of said area, and the SEPA responsible official made a determination of and draft and final environmental impact statements have been issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 144 1988, and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and that the existing plasma'? be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the planning area of the City of Sub -Area 3 of the Fire District #1 Study Area and met with the Renton City Council, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 is characterized by conditions and sensitivity to seismic activity Seismic Area Map, and Renton includes portions of the Tukwila City Council has steep slopes, unstable soil according to the King County WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 would be more appropriately developed by light industrial /commercial uses, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard. Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138 of the City of Tukwila are hereby repealed. Section 2. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map is hereby amended to reflect that the property known as Fire District *1 Study Area and shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby added to such plan map, and the policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and amended in Ordinance No. 1246 and as hereafter amended, shall apply to said area. Section 3. At such time as said described area or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan for the subject area is shown on the map which is attached as "Exhibit B ". Section 5. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of the City Clerk B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 6. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 41! day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: �I Lt L INE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FIL WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 4 88 PUBLISHED: 4 - 41 - Pt EFFECTIVE DATE: 6 - PT ORDINANCE NO.: i4,4(o 33511C2/3l2* Page 2 4. 4, T ON ,1111 --1.1.4.4.5. 7.11 , 7111111 , 411, 14 1.". ...r ,,„ ; 1111111 I 11 FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Lund ammo Study Arca Boundary EXHIBIT A CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT A FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations Lcand I I r r %%IVO 61 rOWWW. 0.41.O.CO Low Density Residential High Density Residential Professional/Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial fr E ir en Parks and Open Space Public Facility EXHIBIT B CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDS118TH & ASSOC..1111C. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA SIC. NORTH ATTACHMENT I tnum WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /5 7 1,Z , City Clerk of the City of Tukwila, do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original on file with the City. � S ATED this . ?day • _ -•- 4 � , 19 Z C City Clerk CITY OF TUKWILA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may at some time in the future be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988 and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and amending the Zoning Code and Zoning Map and that the existing plan, zoning code and plan, and zoning maps, be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4, 1988 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new use zone to accommodate existing, unique, heavy industrial trucking areas that require less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping, and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1988, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. /i/ 7 , amending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and plan map to provide for a plan for the area in the event of annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Fire District #1 Study Area and is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and to the zoning map which consists of Exhibits B, C. and D hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows: 3296C5/334A Page 1 A. Section 18.42.020(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dieing, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws. B. Section 18.42.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: (7) Truck terminals. C. Section 18.42.030 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. D. Section 18.42.040(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; E. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as shown on Map 2. F. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 and Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.040 to include areas as shown on Exhibit E. G. Section 18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.045 Height regulations around major airports. For the purposes of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provision of this section, the city adopts the following airport height map: 3296C5/334A A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, 1986, and as the same may be amended. Page 2 H. Section 18.70 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre - existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD - approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof. (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and windload factor of eighty (80) miles per hour. (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. I. Section 18.06.220 of the Tukwila Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or-a nodular home is not considered a mobile home. J. Section 18.06.240 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.06.240 Dwelling, single - family. "Single - family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 § 1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is considered to be a single - family dwelling. K. Section 18.06 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. L. Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 3296C5/334A Page 3 Sections: 18.43.010 Purpose. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. 18.43.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique industrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping in recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. In the M -2L district, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended or designed for other than the following uses, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.42.030 and 18.42.040: (1) Any principally permitted uses in the M -1 district; (2) Any principally permitted uses in the M -2 district; (3) Truck terminals. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit from the city as provided in Chapter 18.64: (1) Conditional uses as provided in the M -1 district; (2) Conditional uses as provided in the M -2 district; (3) General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 of this title. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. In the M -2L district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and maximum height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. M. Table 2, Required Landscape Areas, of Chapter 18.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Zone Landscape Landscape Landscape District (in feet) (in feet) (in feet) M -2L 5 none none Section 4. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: 32,6Cs/334A M -2L DISTRICT - -HEAVY INDUSTRY /SPECIAL LANDSCAPING A. Office of the City Clerk CHAPTER 18.43 Page 4 B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 4;1 day of fixL , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CLERK, ► INE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFIC «F THE CITY TTO By FI WITH THE CITY CLERK: 11.11- UP PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 41-6-61? PUBLISHED: A- /.: - EFFECTIVE DATE: AP,- /7► Pp' ORDINANCE NO.: ,467 ( FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System lascnd ••1 Study Ara Busadary EXHIBIT A CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. T NORTH ATTACHMENT A II § 1.4 g ;7- leJ 1 4 z < 1 u ■- 4-1 i P•Ot 1'Y • ` •rr ;r'Y ; r ter •;. • 1rR•.Y: •it 4' , 'iYIY.� 4, • u. CN1 rr ; FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 WAMI 1111111111' Regional Retail Business C-2 Lien Industry H-1 Heavy Industry H-2 27 .- A INDUSTRIAL PARK CH NORTH Sias le-fastily Residence R-1-7.2 Low Apartmeats R-4 Multiple Resideace/Higb g. Density EXHIBIT C CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH S ASSOC-J.8C. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT K FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tulaaa Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 2 & 4 MUN Single-family Residence R-1-7.2 [7777.1 Low Apartments R-4 I Multiple Residence/High Density .voyeeee. 1111111MH11111 Community Retail liminess c-1 Regional Retail Betimes c-2 Light Industry M-1 Heavy Industry 2a industrial Park CM 111111111 \ • l• NORTH Professional and Office EXI-IBIT D CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH II ASSOC.,111C. STALZER S ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT L PO r z 1, W 1.. U Et Y W „° J 343102 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /4 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.22 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO BRING TUKWILA LAW INTO CONFORMITY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SOUNDS EMANATING FROM AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT AND AMENDING SECTIONS. 8.22.130 AND 8.22.150 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE AN INCONSISTENCY WHEREAS, Federal Regulations preempt the regulation of noise originating from aircraft in flight and noise originating at airports which is directly related to flight operations, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Municipal Code is currently in conflict with Federal Regulations regarding sounds relating to flight operations which are exempt from noise restrictions, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to bring Tukwila law into conformity with Federal Regulations, other local noise ordinances, and the Washington State Administrative Code, and WHEREAS, there is currently a conflict between the provisions of Sections 8.22.130(7) and 8.22.150(9) relating to the unamplified human voice, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.150(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.22.150 Sounds exempt at all times. The following sounds are exempt from the provisions of this chapter at all times: (1) Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly related to flight operations. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (WAC 173.60.050(1)(3) and (4)(b). If the testing or maintenance is performed at Boeing Field /King County International Airport, the aircraft or component shall be entirely within the ultimate airport property line as shown on the map entitled "Boeing Field /King County International Airport - Airport Layout Plan" (prepared December 1, 1967, revised August 1, 1986) at areas designated by the airport manager. It is intended that this map be the reference map regardless of any future changes, provided that the administrator may grant exceptions to this subsection for good cause shown. A copy of the Airport Layout Plan is at the office of the airport manager of Boeing Field /King County International Airport. Page 1 • Section 2. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.130(7) is amended to read as follows: (7) The amplified or unamplified human voice which unreasonably interferes with peace, comfort and repose of property owners or possessors between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Section 3. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.050(9) is hereby . amended to read: (9) Sounds caused by natural phenomena. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this l day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CIT CLERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILE WITH THE CITY CLERK: 4-4-91? PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 4-4-Pt PUBLISHED: 4.- 12 -sop EFFECTIVE DATE: 4- iV -pp ORDINANCE NO.: /4 3431C2 ii 4 SKYWAY COORDINATED WATER SYSTEM PLAN G. INPLEXENTATION EXCERPT The following sets forth an iaplementatioe program to accomplish the various recommendations of this Plan. These implementation steps should be carried out with the assistance of legal and engineering council. 1. Boundary Adjustments a) Approval and adoption of the SKYWAY Coordinated Water System Plan by the Mt1CC and recoasendation to each purveyor's legislative body to sign a Preliminary Interlocal Service Area Agreement 0R4 j ip A' qy 1g b) Each purveyor adopts and signs the Preliminary Interlocal Service Area Agreement. This Agreement will be subject to modification as necessitated by the requirements of Title 57 RCM pertaining to the annexation and witbdrawl of territory, and the consolidation, merger or dissolution of districts; and of,Chapter 36.93 pertaining to the review of proposed actions by the Washington State Boundary Review Board of King County. Planned boundary adjustments. Subject to meeting the requirements of the state statutes cited in subparagraph 1(c), the following changes and corresponding boundary adjustments. Merge Lakeridge and Water. District 14. ▪ Seattle Takeover of Water District No. 57. • Seattle Takeover of Skyway, Creston and.portionr of Water District Nos. 25 and 125 and Tukwila Service Areas. ▪ Notify customers of pending transfer of services. finalize Tukwila - Water District No. 125 Transfer Agreement. - Negotiate Water District No. 25 Takeover by Tukwila and Water District No. 125. VII -7 .d) DSBS Approval; Xing County Approval. Finalize Service Area Agreement. t)_ Activate the changes to purveyor service areas in compliance with 'established agreements and boundary adjustment authorizations. Each purveyor and /or merged /consolidated District . prepare or update their comprehensive plans to address items identified herein and comply with this CLASP. . Regional Facilities Conduct detailed engineering study of required storage, pumping and transmission facilities. b) Conduct financial analysis of methods of financing (including existing rate structures, application for available grant funding, bond sales, etc) and formulate detailed financial plan. Location and acquisition of site for required facilities. d) Design and construction of required regional facilities. Modification and connection Of existing facilities as required. OtRalyitem Isproteoents vu -s ) In updating their comprehensive plans each purveyor: b) Each purveyor must consider their operation and maintenance programs in relation to changes in service areas (this includes staffing, equipment, procedures, etc.) Detailed rate analyses should be prepared and financial plans made to finance required improvements. d) Emergency operation programs must be developed with consideration of new service areas and possible intertie configurations. 4. Monitoring Prepares a specific capital improvement program identifying the projects recommended herein as well as localized improvements. Considers interties and connections necessitated by boundary changes. a) The implementation of this Plan must be monitored by the participating purveyors, King County and DSAS if it is to be effective. It is therefore necessary for the Water Utility Coordinating Committee to remain in effect. The Committee will be responsible for approving any proposed changes and/or amendments to the Plan and will meet periodically least,,annually, to review the progress of implementing the recommendations put forth .herein. b) Proposed changes to the recommendations adopted herein shall be submitted to the King County Building and Land Development Division, Utilities Section. If the proposed change warrants, the VUCC members will be notified and the appropriate approval meetings held. c) In accordance with the Coordination Act, this Plan shall be updated every 5 years. VII -9 SS 1 SKYWAY CWSSA BOUNDARY LAKE *AsrAOHOr RENTON i ;_ \ f PLATE VI -1 RECOMMENDED SERVICE !AREA BOUNDARIES ^.e 0 K00 I Q� • I P 4 •r••.r.. bp. IHDH1 MeiMA O&M & & A /NdNO. MC. 1 �w r M . 0 1 COP am A FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION STUDY 1. North Boeing Bldg. 2. Associated Grocers Bldg. 3. 51st Ave. S. 4. 56th Place S. 5. Rainier Bank Bldg. TAX LOT SPLITS CCA Yoe HUGH G. GOLOSMTII & AsSOC.$IC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. VICINITY MAP T NORTH J JCIAYED GROCERS INC. 1.3S AC. G.D.C. T.L. IS EASE MINT � i V Ok trt 60 C. TC 4/ N ATM DE t. Lot T1./0/ 5 N ORFOLK 4SSOC1ATED GR i! /9 Sr. i. 1\ ■ - Cl T KWIL O • N° 6U \ tF� \ \ v i EYa I0 -. v0 r .CEO sr) . —. i0 J . • 1 � El 158 159 \ \\ �''\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 ( \ 1 •- .a IE 16 Z8 I4 2 G wOr OPE MED / 33. 2 Od istri 1 J26$ z* /I kl (A) S.P. 79 (D) � 'f b \ ■ \ \ Z ■ p is o \ -� \ ./ G s \ ■ ST E/v/v(T; 18 23 S v J MISS 020 h h I i ; .._ -. I— — -- w0 7SI ?• SA . b.l '991 t 12541 s ;. ,? '.1' • 4 NORTH L INE OF C. C. L EWISIS S�- \- NgPE•N -1 •,I' SdT lb: 12601 12 Fa] VACATED • _ — I _. — t? . -7 , _;- ONAT /ON a.AIM 37 5 � . 9 gCI' b J Pr y � .1.. to o4f ( �o 50 �1� c3S (RERfcSH /RE S7) '^ I 1 9 m 7 5 . I 7 G - -- 230 • - C9 '00 I SO I J .E 474 t SERVIC lRAVERS0 08 AC. 49$ 6 r- /90- -ti 1� 3 I ®7 12051 ., co I: I- - ijI —NM NM IIIII MB MI MI MI I v.) (PLATO ST) '_ 1 ti{, � IT 34 1 1 Rip h; 33 Ai 2 -t • - -- - H W r • - e- 1 - :-- - . I . 32 3 _ _ _ - ' r - - _.. . '�_ ----- .31 • 4 -I•- -- i t _.. -_ I I I 30 ' ' 5 •ItnI• 29 • 6 1 4 5 ��I ‘" 2 is ric t# 1 9 ► 1 Q t 27. 8 $12 13 15 16 17 , Ti /so �� �� 1 14 • 33 N o. 1 a . r • '• i C , \ � 13 Ir 15 16 T7118 I ■ ` . L s `. C7) 5 .4 7 M OMAC {AN Sr) 9 .f r• 4110 ' 1 • 1 .'47 f/ F s T • ' lfnar fl 0 OM MB Ili INS 1 0 7 FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY 1. LOT 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 2. AIRPORT WAY 3.9120 E. MARG. WAY 4.16TH AVENUE S. ISLANDS CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH I A>AOC.,SIC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. VICINITY MAP T NORTH i )5 032 he?. 115TH Ile) 1 • I Z5 - I :3613S : . 1 i • - Tr — I Et; .,,,,.... ; ..314, . j- J5; 0 F RIGHT • 8 • •••••• • • • • • • 1 88.36 LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 S TRUCK PARTS 15.59 Ac I 'it/ER a . . MOORE S ' 1 " 11612 es 1 (C) 5P 577129 — — — 11. 43 42 410 i•■• ()I, • 114 r..) 15 TR \ ‘‘ 23 ss ••■••••.... 24.70 Acres G4/ T. L. WA Y feo — . &AM . CC 1.1.1 'flIVERStBE TR ApYs, 20 INTERURBAN 24 G • cr 4(0,- Lot 5 w w „ „ ci‘i ,.. i0 • 4 .411a, C • r 0/, N...., • , (rwst I nt 7 H s UZI • ••••••• PiIN 8 (LEO Si) • — :2 • 4, : s Si') (0/0 .6 e* s Si') 1. r `cC t n-I y.- S NC1S Aft ATT UONAT/ON LAND CLA /M t0 00 U 40167 " ...iv , t .... .4„'k :,,,,. .‘ viv,...,...,..7t...7itizz.4...v.i.t.,...;;.? -,-;-: -10:6 W a*** .0/4: ' r!....:""‘,11416,17411/4/6 'I. \ • • N N- - N e k k6. • 14 - . ? .1 t:,":721k; 611 6 : 111 :4. 1 • ■ 1161 4.4 14 "16 . a.,AVL ... . filli•■ • • % N t„ ..coloN 4 % , * vow SP.A77 - IN\ e ' .e1,1 ite... s r o , ,... I - - • " • 76 :" 1 VtAVV: ;717 -1 . RIGHT )5W u5 TRUCK PARTS ;5.59 Ac /VER :3 r 3 '. t - U) Cr Z /2/ �-- w X ,4 or WA LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 —tom -- -- Q W INTERURBAN ' Y • 7 Hsi . 117 T R APrt S /' ,2 - Lot 5 (;nv't I nt 7 C'ES/1'T :J. 247.57 1 ' -_• - 230.1 2,8. r 1180 2/5 2 r (el • 8 264 3 :+8.4, re J : (C) (D) SP 577129 5,5.5 I ! , 914 r 218.1.S T 5 ' 73 T . u. I 1. W /d70 Oti'b7 NO /1VZ7 1.IP 11 S/' y - - �17 FIRESTONE RETREAD O/V/SION • ' a ,. 0 ti T R. 3 - \-'1 �., 4G v % � # - ORTIO OF 6 TRAC1 T 2 '\ COMPANY /a2 VA IV. 16.53 At t CT 4 AM roc _SO LW.' NO. LW 1 I FNWORIN ' f\] FAR KING AREA A CT 2 .. A ASS£LT D. L.C. NO. 50_ cNATT D L. C. N0.38 "I00 V' QRAO{EI 7RV CR sA[FS lv 0 A 0 AC T- +— i- I -�—� -� 7 NO. 38 s -O-- „ - -o. _ ���' As, M rI �N ■ ' � .[ �� Z c� je F i / /. river y J1b1AF_4 ��� p!l�lMnr • ` ....1Y ✓�< 411. 116. i r Hr .. A N C a .4 P 04 N o r ])2 22 �3 3$I,c) M 25 115 An. 226At d IA / wn /NO SIRS S z, Q .417c0,.../ I 41 r I/ 6 Or Pt 165 int aite SO? At N N SED ANNEX A --i- ��� °' [Tw. cK N s �►OSf i Govt Lot 13 2734 Acres N FIR LINE JOHN BUM iiitii111115ii ago ail • ��u' �Sa�1' tivY. n�,.. li; E. w:... e.,>..., �..:.. �. u., �.;: nt�.: 2�tRu :7;3,arc'�rxz ^�r,':�'� ^.�e. Year :�t'.,2•,r °:;:. ^.,�:s:r�::xb.: altar. nrr .�,sis TAXING DISTRICT (25 /MB.PROPTAX) City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 State of Washington King County Port of Seattle Emergency Medical Srvcs Fire District No. 1 City of Tukwila * County Road (1,2,3) Library (1,2,3) Hospital (1) Renton School (1) Seattle School (2) South Central School (3) TAXES FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AVERAGE ASSESSED VALUE - $61,300 1987 PROPERTY TAXES FIRE DISTRICT #1 Tax Rate Tax 3.78389 $231.95 1.83959 112.77 .40813 25.02 .25000 15.33 1.50000 91.95 1.58324 97.05 .50000 30.65 .23723 14.54 2.28851 140.29 2.54451 155.98 2.76022 169.20 (Varies according to school district) (1) 12.39059 $759.54 (2) 12.40936 760.69 (3) 12.62507 773.92 * Includes .165 for Foster Golf Links; equals $10.11 for the $61,300 house. 7 a 5 se.:.mtit Pm.}:tfli;:e:+li Tai= zn'f?i,:.mv'r';1�;. TUKWILA Tax Rate Tax 3.78389 $231.95 1.83959 112.77 .40813 25.02 .25000 15.33 MD WO, 2.92792 .23723 2.28851 2.54451 2.76022 179.48 14.54 140.28 155.98 169.20 11.73527 $719.37 11.75404 720.52 11.96975 733.75 tr '1i^fX.::ar..diw.St sdr�i'.;.." Lt 4i:' Si? f.+ m: �sarr: r> w. c� .r.:t::ur.ccihn�N.v...r..wnncu • i t 1 1 i 2. Determine depth of cracks in Gear 13S and grind out or weld repair. Repair other other gears as required. 4 ;435 :t;' ?S;fia si?C MMAITI `Oetn ttir r DTa L. TABLE NO. 5 IMPROVEMENT AND REPAIR COST ESTIMATES SHORT TERM (0 -5 YEARS) ITEM COST STRUCTURAL 1. Core, test, and infrared thermography concrete S 30,000 approach span slabs and bent crossbeams to determine (Testing soundness and chloride concentration. Repair and as required. Analysis only) 2. Clean and paint bridge. 150,000 3. Repair cracked and spalled sidewalks and concrete barriers. 5,000 4. Clean expansion joints and bearings and replace corroded fasteners. 5,000 5a. Strengthen existing bascule piers 2,500,000 b. Dredge near one side of bascule piers to a depth of 25 to 30 ft below existing mudline and ultrasonic test exposed piling; and perform soil boring program to confirm settlement parameters. 6. Perform more in -depth underwater inspection of piers and determine soundness of concrete and reinforcement for cracks above waterline for the bascule piers. Patch cracked and spalled concrete as required. MECHANICAL 1. Clean and perform more in -depth inspection of span drive gears. 200,000 (Strengthing of piers included in 5a.) 250,000 $2,940,000 or $3,140,000 $ 15,000 5,000 (Gear 13S repair only) 3. Machine bottom of racks to provide proper clearances between rack and pinion teeth. 50,000 ,+aH,r» pan::a.+s;^J:tG?:fix0..:z71 M's:?!PLT: `,. +':nAr!nitWIti erVini:' 5bn..favir; %..V. AVWi :ep : :r g"71...{ 4. Move rack cover framework. 5. Disassemble the differential on both span drives and add lube fittings. 6. Install new flange bolts in pinion gears. 7. Drill a 1/2" diameter hole in west curved track tread of the north bascule. 8. Reactivate emergency brake EB1 on the south span drive 9. Install three limit switches on each brake in the span drive system 10. Protect machinery frame mounting bolt adjacent to bearing B19S, south span drive, from corrosion 11. Adjust west motor brake, north span and east motor brake south span 12. Install locking nuts on south span drive emergency brake spring adjusting rods 13. Install guards over brakes, motor couplings, and spur gear sets in auxiliary drives 14. Install energy absorbing traffic gates 15. Replace centerlocks with mechanical/ electrical type ELECTRICAL 1. Replace enclosure for main control relay panel 2. Clean motor contactors and speed control relay. Replace speed control resistor banks. 3. Replace selsyn motors. 4. Clean machine room junction boxes. 5. Replace broken junction box on navigation light. 6. Install new traffic gate operators. 4,000 1,000 20,000 1,000 1,000 25,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,000 200,000 100,000 5435,000 $ 10,000 3,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 30,000 7. Install grounding system and bond all equipment frames. TOTAL 0 -5 YEARS 50,000 5100,000 53,475,000 or 53,675,000 N�i�t1:tYY5�SNY.Mw+AUn nw.�i A. VI Mt ww.. c.. a.. e.... vA. A. wauw a...v.+tiroiM..+N.NnNWFIttM104,0,a ...A.A N;ra CONNWAWAY TABLE NO. 6 IMPROVEMENT AND REPAIR COST ESTIMATES INTERMEDIATE (5 -10 YEARS) AND LONG TERM (10 -20 YEARS) ITEM INTERMEDIATE (5 -10 YEARS) STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL 1. Adjust racks to provide proper clearances between rack and pinion teeth ELECTRICAL 1. Rewind or replace span drive motors TOTAL 10 -20 YEARS 1. Replace concrete approach spans. $2,500,000 MECHANICAL 1. Adjust racks to provide proper clearances between rack and pinion teeth S 10,000 ELECTRICAL 1. Replace motor controls with modern equipment. S 75,000 2. Replace control console 25,000 TOTAL 5 -10 YEARS $2,610,000 LONG TERM (10 -20 YEARS) STRUCTURAL 1. Replace truss approach span concrete deck 500,000 2. Clean and paint bridge. S 150,000 abex JVA.:xtst wtvar.arH Vr1310e 5wpty4moiv. COST S 650,000 S 10,000 10,000 S 670,000 f APPROACH SPANS Superstructure Substructure vdnliCa 10". HAyti+..73." Subtotal Contingencies (15%) TOTAL ESTIMATED COST TABLE NO. 7 16TH AVENUE SOUTH BRIDGE STUDY REPLACEMENT BRIDGE COST ESTIMATE wnunv xa:vA:mmsttP =Mt BASCULE SPAN Superstructure $ 1,800,000 Substructure 4,100,000 Machinery, Electrical and Control Houses 4,000,000 Timber Fender System 400,000 $10,300,000 S 1,900,000 2,200,000 $ 4,100,000 APPROACH ROADWAYS $ 300,000 $14,700,000 2,200,000 $16,900,000 r11W.I1;vie"M;xtiK. 4;i•4;4,11.VroF.aUt.•ltx.s:r '3+ x e4tr' 6 ,n+srytSV . ffgig i5 1, s` m'ie'+ . 1 ,:• st; ti? r.;,° 3:.+: er .,«?•:: I: :::� :,cn..n:t� suv,: :xzuti:t!::ar rpus.•m�ca; ?s t�Fr.± .% Fad; h' tas�(k�sr, S�3:"�`++•$':'.67. �ws5r��e'°��.s.1.v_v�e..rps,n, .,. �.?,.�,.n�".;i�; ANNUAL OPERATING COSTS: GENERAL FUND Police Protection Fire Protection Justice System Community Services Parks & Recreation Library Planning and Regulation Legislative and Admin. Public Works Admin /Engineering Parks Maintenance General Fund Total OTHER FUNDS Street Funds Bridge Water Sewer CAPITAL COSTS: FIRST FIVE YEAR TRANSPORTATION BRIDGE WATER SEWER PARKS SURFACE WATER TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS Alternative I Alternative I.A Alternative II Table 17 COST IMPACT ON TUKWILA PLANNING COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY ROUGH NET FISCAL Annual 0 &M ($2,285,000) ($2,285,000) ($1,975,500) ALT I & I.A. $ 477,500 $ 606,500 $ 44,500 $ 18,000 $ 19,000 $ 37,000 $ 106,500 $ 60,000 $ 189,000 $ 44,000 $1,602,000 $ 218,000 $ 465,000 $ 103,000 $ 103,000 PHASE $2,135,000 $2,500,000 $1,338,000 $1,080,000 $ 460,000 $ 100,000 $7,613,000 ALT II $ 313,500 $ 606,500 $ 32,000 $ 10,000 $ 18,000 $ 20,000 $ 106,500 $ 35,000 $ 161,000 $ 44,000 $1,346,500 $ 164,000 $ 465,000 $ 103,000 $ 103,000 $1,880.000 $2,500,000 $1,240,000 $1,080,000 $ 460,000 $ 100,000 $7,260,000 IMPACT (Unadjusted) Annual Revenues Net Impact $1,893,500 ($391,500) $2,088,000 ($197,000) $1,945,000 ($ 30,500) PI( ;AL IMPACT SUMM&Y SHEET FIRE DISTRICT NUMBER ONE FiNrce CITY CLERK PERSONNEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT OPER COSTS/ FACILITIES TOTAL BY DEPARTMENT FIRE 23/ '791 0 0 #245 POLICE 5LI- 12 4 14 s.1 PUBLIC WORKS 4'1? 1,391 PLANG/ BLDG / o.s1 t3bR 51 0 (04 Lj93 PARKS/ REC 20 at 44 /.S/ #53 30 33 TOTAL BY FUNCTION 283 a,/go PERSO CAPITAL EQUIPMENT OPER COSTS/ FACILITIES TOTAL BY DEP -' ENT FIRE POLICE PUBLIC WORKS PLANG/ BLDG PARKS/ REC CITY CLERK TOTAL BY FUNCTION PERSONNEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT OPER COSTS/ FACILITIES FIRE n POLICE si 280 PUBLIC WORKS 4o 84 PLANG/ BLDG 31 PARKS/ REC 1.18 n CITY CLERK L s/ 53 to 2s TOTAL BY FUNCTION 16S TOTAL BY DEPARTMENT 4 0 I I 3 3 4 Flo ?$ .# 3a1 $ 34 4 9 1 11,898 ,G I 36.70 Ac 'ORPORATE' (P 4 $ N N ' N •\ N X40, N \ \ *-\ N �N 42 lit! 1 it l(d; I r ltil V • C :. U !/ /T 1 „ , 44S% 46 S3THISTLE ST o • G:1 S •110 18-1 32 Q ' i 10 9 6 5 4 ll 3 2 1 1 3 4 5 o I I �`� r ., H E r Q IS a 10I� �1� e 4 1 1 Io I c 1 o 2 A t1 ss I i V A C A if - i+. - --8- a. - -t SE 1TT . CORPORATE: Govt. Lot 13 2734 Acres % /nw r SI BLK 10 N N N N F \ N G 0 y 9 N • N \ tn M "' s . •v 5 AV ST - II„r'LS jrrr 6T" AV S I S- .TH -/ h FI Vo MTHP 1 a 61" FL 6. AV S 7i" AV N sllrl PL VI t N vt YV 1- -m t5 r k M Ti G i?,6r" Av.S sr, ; W Ira c = 5 . T M 1 � • 1 = „cu. sall T, l y .i7' 3 t ff ;wb AV' SW . o. N N 5 Y " S S a :/ 10944 HA = AV 9TH PL S 40 "AV 491 " AV SYr " " e o sae r +� .(1 7" 6. AV ]N0 • 34" AV S ry'H 5151 AV 5 ?Cr " AV V• _21ST AV SS L : ,.. i .•..." ! .4 cn ST. :ST . ,,,,ii, r „GO _ � , _ _ = N _o S • 5' NI t 1 roes« . E ` ....J 4, iO � $ ST < i • hh .:413/4.,:- n ; .. ST f r y .��T St ',A \ �� `S VrISr f Srte T sr S 1,14'. � mi = - 1 ` _.r ST INT S SST > ST (/, S� fAin Sl • 55. UISi r zSt L.:6STer RO wSTK S"1... ! _Si 1 1TtS S Ti >r.v zrS 334. Wy S �T ▪ . IN ., i 2, .- < O ROAT1rewR '1 1 _- 1 S ."'") t 1' . „n 4:1f, -+1 • VA" r ava BEACH 1 9 I � C \ \\ 9 60,x : 1/1 RIIIMIER Y•, 5~ S ` ETCHER ` [LETCI ;T ° a `�� c i4 .1 ... x se Fe cQ a `S.D 'I, . AP - , I S' PI GRIM •6 S P S° S. Fq L '^ F 9 s °�, — S \f = GSIEL c I m ^ �. 3 -9 i S COOPER s.rrpc. ti: ON1 > u ., G .O S PLAN ' 7i I ! - = rn -, rLS 5(15T m 116 SI /61HS1 ' © 1 BOAT LAUNCH =F L/NE DOUGLAS C CALVIN 0.90AC. Z.I6 Ac. 3eps6 ea es 0.0 /?0.67 ■ti 6152 40e. 598 /4.5 fr. _47. 50 150 I55 ' 4 , / 3S 'tr. , / \ ` 6 " 4 '' / 0, :1- (b 1 fr V T E D ACA A 4 A/ ST ) Z fat. 4 •3 b It V. L. 0 I A 3 4) - a k'.. o 0 TL . I ,..), 0 c)c A p N 4 1 L. VAC 6S 00 OUGLAS C. CALVIN 3.07 Ac. %IMMO OMB • " ' 'ea ••••%" 7"1. 30 IL.5 7 '11 301 .561 /28774 Si tl. 1. C. rt. C3 scp 454. j42- 4 44.9.340 6 8 O I205 /50 157 'E. roo 156 200 150 7t7; 154L 153 6 35 152 NOT OPEN /33.29 52. /00 99 •3 Gi /9 e3/"b F,r • Cp as , 1 7 % 80 I it 1 \\ \�I :gib 1 II u4A � a\ $) • I `I \�� 1 ,e C� o A ; \ y 1 1 i!� 1 1 30 = — 11811 I- 1 l s . $ co r- c.. 1 � 11815 N ,�q \:_.J' —. 1 II 4 . - - - I I • "II8 1 _ --1 I • 10' fAS£M[NT III 71 v � C I J36$ 7:U //99/ G ■ { \ GA RAGE 0 90 0 11832 7 3 6/ (8 ' 124 ( C f6 ea.. - o9 I: J r • 1I f L6'f6 00, , b II.sz t zi-lr II GI 06'b II LZ 9 I if 9Z aos L I I __ 8 lihin 11111r6 7. 6 ��0, 0 >- W J U z -J z ez'se N w • • O O J U L cn P. Sg ! ff s .� I .. rvaOoZ • r• • ^ s roo/ oO9 Ik 9sr'sbg o j►/ U1 9 8 A 9 cr 6 - o • 0* „ Co t h z4 ,ji00 ta 4%77. 46,14 0, 'net ti• AA. DUI.KLti -r �.. 13 2463 P21 •25 N G1 6'60033 -f'---- C4.43v€ROM € N. t N 16.2 B 766 0 P 16 S 89 497823 • ry C. v cf a •I S'" - r '' ' 14 N • '144 z'ZI ■ � 4.i h 25 N f V 4y b 6 ACV °oo 0 ,ji00 ta 4%77. 46,14 0, 'net ti• AA. DUI.KLti -r �.. 13 2463 P21 •25 N G1 6'60033 -f'---- C4.43v€ROM € N. t N 16.2 B 766 0 P 16 S 89 497823 • ry C. v cf a •I S'" - r '' ' 14 N • '144 z'ZI N \ \ ffAJE L M T Ca-El 10-8 Gov't. Lot 13 2734 Acres Ar.v .f,k.Pecepeo4- 10F42TruxAiii2'e3 N -3 N N N M. C A CITY OF TUKWILA ANNEXATION POLICIES Adopted by Resolution No. 992, Passed March 3, 1986 1.0 GENERAL STATEMENTS ON ANNEXATION 1.1 The City of Tukwila strongly encourages annexations within its planning area and contiguous to the City boundaries. COMMENTS: For purposes of planned growth and fiscal responsibilities, Tukwila should, for the immediate future, consider annexations within the planning area and adjacent special use districts. 1.2 The City of Tukwila will freely make available to persons /areas interested in annexation any information related to its taxes or services. Each annexation process should emphasize public information and clear commu- nication among the Tukwila community, City government and the area under consideration. COMMENTS: Upon request, City Council members, the Mayor, and other appro- priate persons as designated by the Mayor will be available to attend meetings, provide information and explain the City's annexation policy. 1.3 Tukwila and King County should work together through interlocal agreements to implement coordinated local policy which will provide municipal serv- ices. COMMENTS: Specific annexation proposals have a greater chance of success if they are coordinated with local policy and receive support from other jurisdictions. 1.4 An annexation report shall be presented to the City Council for all annexa- tions. Major annexations should include a thorough study /assessment of the area under consideration, a financial report analysis, and a plan for meeting the area's service needs. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that Tukwila has an appropriate assess- ment of the annexation area. This will include the potential costs and benefits to the community, consideration of any exist- ing Capital Improvement Plans and, when necessary, a plan for providing municipal services to the area. This approach is intended to make the annexation process smoother and more predictable. 2.0 METHOD OF ANNEXATION The most appropriate means to accomplish annexations may be either an election or a petition, depending upon the size of the area and the number of property owners involved. COMMENTS: With few property owners involved, the petition method is gener- ally easier. With many property owners involved, the election method may be the easier. 3.0 SIZE OF ANNEXATION AREAS 3.1 The City allows and encourages annexation regardless of the size of the area. COMMENTS: The City has an open arms policy toward annexation. 3.2 Tukwila encourages annexations of a sufficiently large size for efficient processing and provision of municipal services. COMMENTS: Annexations of all sizes will help Tukwila grow and reach its planning area boundaries. Larger annexations are generally a more efficient means to bring territory into Tukwila's juris- diction. City of Tukwila Annexation Policies Page 2 4.0 ANNEXATION COSTS 4.1 Tukwila will pay the basic costs of the annexation process including admin- istration, environmental threshold determination, and filing fees. If an annexation requires an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Tukwila will consider assuming the costs on a case -by -case basis. COMMENTS: Tukwila hopes to encourage annexations by taking on the routine costs of annexation. EIS work can be very costly and Tukwila will consider each case individually. 4.2 Assuming Tukwila's bonded indebtedness shall be considered on a case -by- case basis. COMMENTS: The general purpose facilities developed for any bond issue provide services for all Tukwila and any area joining Tukwila through annexation. Different tax rates which foster different service expectations among citizen groups should be avoided. ** NOTE ** The Committee recommends that indebtedness be refinanced as general obligation thereby eliminating the bonded indebtedness issue from annexation consideration. 5.0 BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY The boundaries of the City are a result of petitioners' actions and what- ever form they take is of little significance. COMMENTS: The City will need to develop its plans on how to best service an area regardless of the City's boundaries. 6.0 SERVICE 6.1 The City should maintain service levels for Tukwila's existing citizens when new areas are considered for annexation. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that the present service levels to residents and businesses will not be diminished because of annexation. 6.2 The City should provide for facilities and services for newly annexed areas according to the following guidelines: - First, to maintain existing facilities and services. - Second, to upgrade existing facilities and services to Tukwila standards; - Third, to provide new facilities and services to support planned growth. COMMENTS: This policy will provide a consistent basis for identifying needs and setting priorities to furnish facilities and services in a newly annexed area. 6.3 Tukwila should determine whether or not to assume management of fire, sewer, or water districts in annexation areas on a case -by -case basis subject to the requirements of RCW 35.13A. COMMENTS: Tukwila's planning areas include portions of several special purpose districts providing water, sewer, and fire services. In light of the individual factors pertaining to the operation of each, the decision to assume administration should be made on a case -by -case basis. City Council members, the Mayor, and other appropriate persons as designated by the Mayor should contact the affected special purpose districts. (26 /ANNEXPOLI1,2) City of Tukwila Annexation Policies Page 3 7.0 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS (EMPLOYEES) The City will retain the employees of special purpose districts when it assumes the ownership and administration of the district. COMMENTS: There is presently state law requiring this. The State RCW reads as follows: "35.13.A.090 - Employment rights of district employees. When- ever a city acquires all of the facilities of a water district or sewer district, pursuant to this chapter, such a City shall offer to employ every full time employee of the district who is engaged in the operation of such a district's facilities on the date on which such city acquires the district facilities. When a city acquires any portion of the facilities of such a dis- trict, such a city shall offer to employ full time employees of the district as of the date of the acquisition of the facili- ties of the district who are no longer needed by the district. "Whenever a city employs a person who has employed immediately prior thereto by the district, arrangements shall be made: (1) For the retention of service credits under the pension plan of the district pursuant to RCW 41.04.070 through 41.04.110; (2) For the retention of all sick leave standing to the employee's credit in the plan of such district; (3) For a vacation with pay during the first year of employment equivalent to that to which he would have been entitled if he had remained in the employment of the district. (1971 1st ex.s. c 95 §9.)" 8.0 PLANNING AND ZONING 8.1 The land use proposed for an area to be annexed should be consistent with Tukwila's adopted Comprehensive Plan Policies and other land use require- ments. COMMENTS: This policy will ensure that zoning for annexation areas shall be determined both according to Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and in consideration of existing uses in the area. 8.2 Tukwila should consider simultaneous zoning for annexations on a case -by- case basis. COMMENTS: Simultaneously adopting the zoning designation for the annexa- tion area and the annexation itself will provide predictability for the City of Tukwila, property owners, and residents involved in an annexation action. 8.3 In newly annexed areas, buildings and facilities which do not comply with Tukwila's zoning and other code requirements shall be considered noncon- forming uses. COMMENTS: Designating nonconforming uses in newly annexed areas will ensure that they are treated the same as existing nonconforming uses in Tukwila. WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /Et c. v II" ,• 1,'+ / City Clerk of the City ofL,, mile, do certify that this is a true ana correct copy of the original on file with the City. D • TED this L4!day of . 19 CE. City Clerk CITY OF TUKWILA AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, ENACTED PURSUANT TO RCW 35A.14.330, REPEALING ORDINANCES 1118 AND 1138, ADOPTING A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED LYING OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA AND KNOWN AS FIRE DISTRICT # 1 STUDY AREA, AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN AND PLAN MAP UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area, at some future time, will be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, parts of said area are within the City's planning area and therefore subject to the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan, and WHEREAS, existing ordinance nos. 1118 and 1138 provide for land use planning and zoning regulation for two parts of said area, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14; 1988, and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and that the existing plan map be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the planning area of the City of Renton includes portions of Sub -Area 3 of the Fire District *1 Study Area and the Tukwila City Council has met with the Renton City Council, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 is characterized by steep slopes, unstable soil conditions and sensitivity to seismic activity according to the King County Seismic Area Map, and WHEREAS, Sub -Area 3 would be more appropriately developed by light industrial /commercial uses, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, 3359C2/392A Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance Nos. 1118 and 1138 of the City of Tukwila are hereby repealed. Section 2. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map is hereby amended to reflect that the property known as Fire District #1 Study Area and shown on attached Exhibit A is hereby added to such plan map, and the policies and standards for future development, utilization, and future growth of the City of Tukwila as adopted in Ordinance No. 1039 and amended in Ordinance No. 1246 and as hereafter amended, shall apply to said area. Section 3. At such time as said described area or any part thereof shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subjected to and a part of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan herein adopted as an extension to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tukwila. Section 4. The Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan for the subject area is shown on the map which is attached as "Exhibit B ". Section 5. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: A. Office of the City Clerk B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works . D. City Attorney Section 6. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 4!.6 day of 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: IT C mA E ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: PUBLISHED: 6-.12- Et EFFECTIVE DATE: 6 PP ORDINANCE NO.: 41,i, 33$9C2,392A 4- 4- re 6-6- 88 Page 2 _4,2rc 1E iihik ifeetUZ ICI IIij N I II III II iIIlI IIII IIII I I II ' I�I IIIII p Un�.. ,hI I I �I 1 {I �;! ! h i� H � 1 1 'i l IIIIIII l V1 II 1 � i ll l� � HI III Ali I�1III� hl .II 1 Ili d�� I lln � II FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Wcod slims= Study Area Boundary EXHIBIT A NORTH CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ATTACHMENT A FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations Lcacod Low Density Residential High Deasity Residential Professional /Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial R IM Parks and Open Space Public Facility EXHIBIT B CCA Me HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,IIC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TOA INC. ATTACHMENT I NORTH tIGURE • CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /46 7 • I.l.4L � "" - L •r • -46•'C.• City Clerk of the City 6,, akipgila, do certify that this is a true and correct copy of the original on file with the City. ATEO this 4S. day .f , 19 Er. City Clerk AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA PURSUANT to RCW 35A.14.330 ADOPTING ZONING REGULATIONS, ADOPTING ZONING MAP, AND AMENDING THE TUKWILA ZONING CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE AREA DESCRIBED AS FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 STUDY AREA AND PROVIDING THAT SAID AREA SHALL BECOME SUBJECT TO SAID ZONING REGULATIONS UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, it is reasonable to expect that the hereinafter described area may at some time in the future be annexed to the City of Tukwila, and WHEREAS, the SEPA responsible official made a determination of significance and draft and final environmental impact statements have been prepared and issued, and WHEREAS, in December of 1987 the planning staff held land use meetings in the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings on March 31, 1988 and April 14, 1988 and recommended that a land use plan be adopted amending and extending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and amending the Zoning Code and Zoning Map and that the existing plan, zoning code and plan, and zoning maps, be amended to include such changes, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwila held two public hearings on April 4, 1988 and May 16, 1988, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and the comments of all those wishing to be heard, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to add a new use zone to accommodate existing, unique, heavy industrial trucking areas that require less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping, and WHEREAS, on May 16, 1988, the Tukwila City Council adopted Ordinance No. / , amending the existing Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan and plan map to provide for a plan for the area in the event of annexation, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Affected. The area subject to this Ordinance is known as Fire District #1 Study Area and is as shown on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. Zoning Code and Map Adopted Upon Annexation. At such time as the area described in Exhibit A, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, the City Council may provide in the annexation ordinance that so much of said area as is thereby annexed shall be subject to the Zoning Code of the City of Tukwila and to the zoning map which consists of Exhibits B, C, and D hereto, said zoning map and zoning regulations herein adopted to be an extension to the zoning regulations for the City of Tukwila. Section 3. Zoning Code Amended Upon Annexation. At such time as said described area, or any part thereof, shall be annexed to the City of Tukwila, Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is amended as follows: 3296C5/334A Page 1 3. A. Section 18.42.020(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication; steel production by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refining, and consumable electrode melting; structural iron or pipe works; stamping, dieing, shearing, punching, open die hammer or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws. B. Section 18.42.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: (7) Truck terminals. C. Section 18.42.030 of the Tukwila Muncipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. D. Section 18.42.040(4) of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: (4) Railroad freight or classification yards; E. Section 18.50.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and south of the Duwamish River bounded by SR -599, SR -99 and East Marginal Way as shown on Map 2. F. Revise Map 2 referred to in both Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.030 and Tukwila Municipal Code 18.50.040 to include areas as shown on Exhibit E. G. Section 18.50 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.50.045 Height regulations around major airports. For the purposes of regulating heights within the vicinity of major airports, there are established and created certain height limitation zones which include all the land lying within the instrument approach zones, noninstrument approach zones, transition zones, horizontal zones and conical zones. Such areas may be shown and defined on an "Airport Height Map" which shall become a part of this ordinance by adoption of the Council. No building or structure shall be erected, altered or maintained, nor shall any tree be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit herein established in any of the several zones created by this section; provided, however, that this provision shall not prohibit the construction of or alteration of a building or structure to a height of thirty -five feet above the average finish grade of the lot. Where an area is covered by more than one height limitation zone, the more restrictive limitations shall prevail. Under the provision of this section, the city adopts the following airport height map: 329iCs/334A A. Airport Height Map: King County International Airport (Boeing Field), August 1, 1986, and as the same may be amended. Page 2 H. Section 18.70 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.70.055 Mobile and Manufactured Homes. Legally pre - existing mobile and manufactured homes may be replaced. The replacement must be with a HUD - approved manufactured home and must also meet the following standards: (1) Shall have roofing material that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, approved wood, asphalt composition shingles, or fiberglass, but excluding corrugated aluminum, corrugated fiberglass or metal roof. (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of 3 inch rise for each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. (3) Shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, which shall include design specifications for Seismic Zone 3 and windload factor of eighty (80) miles per hour. (4) Shall have exterior siding that is residential in appearance including, but not limited to, clapboards, simulated clapboards such as conventional vinyl or metal siding, wood shingles, shakes or similar material, but excluding smooth, ribbed, or corrugated metal or plastic panels. (5) Shall have the hitch, axles and wheels removed. I. Section 18.06.220 of the Tukwila Municipal Code are hereby amended as follows: 18.06.220 Dwelling, mobile home. "Mobile home dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit which does not conform to the Uniform Building Code or the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, and which is designed for transportation after fabrication on streets or highways on its own wheels or on flatbed or other trailers, and arriving at the site where it is to be occupied as a dwelling complete and ready for occupancy except for minor and incidental unpacking and assembly operations, location on jacks or other temporary or permanent foundations, connections to utilities, and the like. A travel trailer, a manufactured home, or a modular home is not considered a mobile home. J. Section 18.06.240 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 18.06.240 Dwelling, single- family. "Single- family dwelling" means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile or manufactured home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 § 1(part), 1982). A modular home which is factory built, transportable in one or more sections, and meets the Uniform Building Code is considered to be a single - family dwelling. K. Section 18.06 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 18.06.221 Dwelling, Manufactured Home. Manufactured dwelling means a detached residential dwelling unit fabricated in an off -site manufacturing facility for installation or assembly at the building site, bearing a label certifying that it is built in compliance with the Federal Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. L. Title 18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: 3296CS/334A Page 3 Sections: CHAPTER 18.43 M -2L DISTRICT - -HEAVY INDUSTRY /SPECIAL LANDSCAPING 18.43.010 Purpose. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. 18.43.010 Purpose. The purpose of this district is to recognize and provide for a unique industrial area which developed long before other City zoning districts were formed, which has uses of significant air and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare and other environmental impacts, and which requires less strict design standards and flexibility in front yard landscaping in recognition of use trends of heavy truck terminals and servicing thereof. 18.43.020 Principally permitted uses. In the M -2L district, no building or land shall be used and no building shall be erected, altered, or enlarged, which is arranged, intended-or designed for other than the following uses, except as otherwise provided in Section 18.42.030 and 18.42.040: (1) Any principally permitted uses in the M -1 district; (2) Any principally permitted uses in the M -2 district; (3) Truck terminals. 18.43.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. 18.43.040 Conditional uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit from the city as provided in Chapter 18.64: (1) Conditional uses as provided in the M -1 district; (2) Conditional uses as provided in the M -2 district; (3) General conditional uses as specified in Chapter 18.64 of this title. 18.43.050 Height, yard and area requirements. In the M -2L district, the minimum dimensions of lots and yards and maximum height of buildings shall be as specified in Chapter 18.50. 18.43.060 Parking regulations. Parking regulations shall be as provided in Chapter 18.56. M. Table 2, Required Landscape Areas, of Chapter 18.52.020 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, is hereby amended to reflect the addition of the following: Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Zone Landscape Landscape Landscape District (in feet) (in feet) (in feet) M -2L 5 none none Section 4. A certified copy of this ordinance shall be filed in the Office of the King County Department of Records and Elections. Certified copies shall be filed with the following City of Tukwila Departments: 3296CS/334A A. Office of the City Clerk Page 4 B. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works D. City Attorney Section 5. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days after publication of the attached Summary which is hereafter approved. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 43' day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFIC oF THE CITY TTORNEY By ,!/1[A—. PI . o WITH THE CITY CLERK: 4-4- PP PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 4 - b - iIQ PUBLISHED: L - 1.2 - QP EFFECTIVE DATE: E, _ /7 PQ' ORDINANCE . NO.: ,447 3296C5/334A \v,itiegt. 4 14' mikr Ban lin pt EolmoD 1 `C•.NTY ■� tekt. 11 , j u m miot o minsplia 31 Lemur a 9 9 4, O N FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Street System Laud ••m•= Study Arcs Boaadary EXHIBIT A CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH a ASSOC.,INC. STALZER S ASSOCIATES TDA INC. T NORTH ATTACHMENT A 7 T 00 10 I L ' 2 .4 l a n • • • • •.•• ..• . •Pr* ef. • . • .• ••: % • • '4*. ...••••%•.•:•" •,"•:•• :•:•• •••••••••• • • „F•• •: •• • • . ::: ...... . ' • % . .. . .... • %, ...; • . • • • ......... .... , • • • .... % .:::.% ....,....."4.... :,..,:, .-- ...%... il .. „... ... 3...- • / •!.... :::.4.. *-.. - F.., i . ::. :•.* I , .1:::::::;::: • - 4: • • • • ,.. .k:., :If ./... . %%, , , • • ::, '4 • • :: . ..• :1 ... .. • • ...., • •; •-•-•. ••:..! ! . , .4 4 .4, % '4.• P ••••••• • ..4 ::::,.: ::., :. :: • § - I:. ... ... .1::: .- :.....:.: •i. . ,S. ..:?:. I.;:,••••:•:,-1. ••••;. • • :-.. :- .4 P. • .... ... .... • f FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 1111111111' /t• NORTH Slagle-family Resideace R-1-7.2 P \--) Multiple Residesce/High pm,. Density Low Apartments Regina* Retail Beam= C-2 Light ladustry N-1 Heavy ladustry N-2 (27A INDUSTRIAL PARK CM EXHIBIT C CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH 4 ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA SIC. ATTACHMENT K FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 2 & 4 Wad Mge Single-family Residence R-1-7.2 (77771 Low Apartments Multiple Residence/High R N B Density " •AP.S.O.A IMMIIIHM11 1111111110 S. • NORTH Professional sad Office p0 Community Retail Business c-1 C-2 Regioaal Retail Business Light Industry Heavy Industry Industrial Park EXHIBIT D ATTACHMENT L N M-2 cm CCA Inc IRAN G. GOLOSIMTH & ASSOC.01C. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. m rn rn m 3431C2 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /46 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.22 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO BRING TUKWILA LAW INTO CONFORMITY WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS REGARDING SOUNDS EMANATING FROM AIRCRAFT IN FLIGHT AND AMENDING SECTIONS. 8.22.130 AND 8.22.150 OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TO REMOVE AN INCONSISTENCY WHEREAS, Federal Regulations preempt the regulation of noise originating from aircraft in flight and noise originating at airports which is directly related to flight operations, and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Municipal Code is currently in conflict with Federal Regulations regarding sounds relating to flight operations which are exempt from noise restrictions, and WHEREAS, it is desirable to bring Tukwila law into conformity with Federal Regulations, other local noise ordinances, and the Washington State Administrative Code, and WHEREAS, there is currently a conflict between the provisions of Sections 8.22.130(7) and 8.22.150(9) relating to the unamplified human voice, NOW, THEREFORE, THE TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.150(1) is hereby amended to read as follows: 8.22.150 Sounds exempt at all times. The following sounds are exempt from the provisions of this chapter at all times: (1) Sounds originating from aircraft in flight and sounds that originate at airports which are directly related to flight operations. Sounds created by aircraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operations between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. (WAC 173.60.050(1)(3) and (4)(b). If the testing or maintenance is performed at Boeing Field /King County International Airport, the aircraft or component shall be entirely within the ultimate airport property line as shown on the map entitled "Boeing Field /King County International Airport - Airport Layout Plan" (prepared December 1, 1967, revised August 1, 1986) at areas designated by the airport manager. It is intended that this map be the reference map regardless of any future changes, provided that the administrator may grant exceptions to this subsection for good cause shown. A copy of the Airport Layout Plan is at the office of the airport manager of Boeing Field /King County International Airport. Page 1 • • Section 2. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.130(7) is amended to read as follows: (7) The amplified or unamplified human voice which unreasonably interferes with peace, comfort and repose of property owners or possessors between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Section 3. Tukwila Municipal Code Section 8.22.050(9) is hereby amended to read: (9) Sounds caused by natural phenomena. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in force and effect five days from and after its passage by the Council and publication as required by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, this 4,1111 day of , 1988. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: CIT LERK, MAXINE ANDERSON APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY By FIL / WITH THE CITY CLERK: 6 - 6. 88 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: 6 - 6- Q8 PUBLISHED: G - /.2 -8P EFFECTIVE DATE: 6-/V-:: ORDINANCE NO.: /444 3431C2 Page 2 SKY WAY COORDINATED WATER SYCEM PLAN G. IMPLEMENTATION EXCERPT The following sets forth an isplementatiotr program to accomplish the various recommendations of this Plan. These implementation steps should be carried out with the assistance of legal and engineering council. 1. Boundary Adjustments a) Approval and adoption of the SKYWAY Coordinated Water System Plan by the WUCC and recommendation to each purveyor's legislative body to sign a Preliminary Interlocal Service Area Agreement. ggFT M 198 b) Each purveyor adopts and signs the Preliminary Interlocal Service Area Agreement. This Agreement will be subject to modification as necessitated by the requirements of Title 57 RCW pertaining to the annexation and withdrawl of territory, and the consolidation, merger or dissolution of districts; and of .Chapter 36.93 pertaining to the review of proposed actions by the Washington State Boundary Review Board of King County. c) Planned boundary adjustments. Subject to meeting the requirements of the state statutes cited in subparagraph 1(c), the following changes and corresponding boundary adjustments. - Merge Lakeridge and Water District 14. ▪ Seattle Takeover of Water District No. 57. ▪ Seattle Takeover of Skyway, Creston and portion of Water District Nos. 25 and 125 and Tukwila Service Areas. - Notify customers of pending transfer of services. - Finalize Tukwila - Water District No. 125 Transfer Agreement. - Negotiate Water District No. 25 Takeover by Tukwila and Water District No. 125. VII -7 2. Regional Facilities d) DSAS Approval; Ring County Approval. e) Finalize Service Area Agreement. f) Activate the changes to purveyor service areas in compliance with established agreements and boundary adjustment authorizations. g) Each purveyor and /or merged /consolidated District prepare or update their comprehensive plans to address items identified herein and comply with this CVSP. Conduct detailed engineering study of required storage, pumping and transmission facilities. b) Conduct financial analysis of methods of financing (including existing rate structures, application for available grant funding, bond sales, etc) and formulate detailed financial plan. Location and acquisition of site for required facilities. d) Design and construction of required regional facilities. Modification and connection of existing facilities as required. 3.. Other System Improvements a) In updating their comprehensive plans each purveyor: VII -8 • Prepares a specific capital improvement program identifying the projects recommended herein as well as localized improvements.' ▪ Considers interties and connections necessitated by boundary changes. b) Each purveyor must consider their operation and maintenance programs in relation to changes in service areas (this includes staffing, equipment, procedures, etc.) 4. Monitoring Detailed rate analyses should be prepared and financial plans made to finance required improvements. d) Emergency operation programs must be developed with consideration of new service areas and possible intertie configurations. a) The implementation of this Plan * must be monitored by the participating purveyors, King County and DSHS if it is to be effective. it is therefore necessary for the Water Utility Coordinating Committee to remain in effect. The Committee will be responsible for approving any proposed changes and /or amendments to the Plan and will meet periodically least,,annually, to review the progress of implementing the recommendations put forth herein. b) Proposed changes to the recommendations adopted herein shall be submitted to the King County Building and Land Development Division, Utilities Section. If the proposed change warrants, the VUCC members will be notified and the appropriate approval meetings held. In accordance with the Coordination Act, this Plan shall be updated every 5 years. VII -9 - )f SKYWAY CWSSA BOUNDARY ....L,;," t- ',- ter",-, i . `� \ \l\ ' • ` `.a i RENTON. _ �, ■ 4E T n p uXE W 9* T 1 PLATE VI -1 RECOMMENDED SERVICE IAREA BOUNDARIES ov'�� 3 - ^._: _•_._ I . •ro.•,el bp. (HDR1 Motion Otani. + A.,.tiale,, Inc. 1 o�ay . a..r. niw cn x r' 0 0 rr 1 ,14 I JAdlr 42 4" 44 N N c oi WHISTLE ST Figs ical B4 S %%%%%%% ........................... N „ NN N Neb. -N, ■■• N N ■411. N exation boundary ■A r. rAVA 'A e 231 ta Nelb ,I1U1;.\\ 9172- V I(i n t -o V EASEMENT • FtlwJ k`kfit rf >.. 60.C. TL.4/ • DE t - tIet ' 6.0 i 7.1.2 60.C. 7.1.39 /3.37 6.O.C. n 49 /5..56 ••.• 6 P.C. Ti. 24 MO rEL A 1.44. 1.44 AC. ❑ Ta sC" AURELIO DESIMONE T1.6/ 652. 05 4.05 AG. AURELIO DESIMONE G.D.C. P160.0 TI.24 760C. T.L.14 vrca -TI 49 T1 /02 )765 30" ESMT. strict #1 B ndary ICIAfED GROCERS INC. 1.35 AC. 6.D.C. NO RFOLK SSOCIATED GR rl ST. CI $ 61 "Q 9 c3 41 : - Tr KwIL E.2 10-, *0 0) • - — • - (� 101 3 � } % � • (, 106 to c to — tai C,. 158 0, — I p �r 159 0 160 NQ `i 2 / �� ^' 1223 i II (9 s L9 N./ � N L1 N d` \N \N N. ` .." N. N Mr 12 4 II I Y laze 131 /04 13 NOS OP / r, 06 /8s. /0 istn /33.29 ;AO /7 • NOT OPEN MOFq ?. •O' CA$EMCNT 3366 N //99/ 1. 27 /998 .. ,': ./.s h CII bO 1:6./ d Elf? oC=3oc 6077 09 • \ • A \ C6wCJle CT^:r 1:1 Z=1.0.0%. /96 r t e rc JO. e 19, C ENNET) 18 Sr cp I 23 5` 1 2 • St 12051 13.2e 2 /00 1 06 of /00 I. 17 •13 4// 992. 12541 i;:.4 ' 7,Z4 1 +o G . a 5o %I% 45 N O T -.9 47N •vE 5 \7 �� OPEN (RfRKSH/Rf ST) ? > M S 1 'r 12601 12 11 608 I T I 'S1 o I p �` s � ° 3. 5 125TH ST•`� 4 799 a •J74 9fRVI [RAVERS° 08 Ac. [.•1/ 4 6 dQ # 1,1 r /90 33 ]1Z' �y (PLATO ST) e2 .93 S r �- z • cc an D Q I WM �12 z• 2 — 4, , \ � 40 1 9 4I NORTH L /NE OF C. C. L EW /S s ONAT /ON CLAM °P �L F 22 ric Bounda O� NNNM In 'O 1 ' •b 1 .'a 7 .!/ la gat t M C.' 1280 , I c<s - - - - -1 510 M 0 I n Cn I . •n 5► (1 r I r D ?/) ,4) 1 00 � o� • MtZ M a U f co, Azipmp, L tingLif M mtg. FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY 1. LOT 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 2. AIRPORT WAY 3.9120 E. MARG. WAY 4.16TH AVENUE S. ISLANDS CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & AIHOC.,MC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. VICINITY MAP NORTH 3231 I29 20 21 26 2 032 Ac: • / 13 .41 4IS 5 o RiGMr 802.75 TRUCK PARTS 15 .59 Ac. LOTS 7,8,9; BLOCK 22 DYER 3 42 41 33 1 36T 35 �� I 1 ■ 4.I 1) N �� c 5 W 4c -1;€4 L J 1 1 P i10 ((h a ' 1 1:49 67 H: C• sr Mi 2. /9. - - '- -7 'e- - 1180 11620 11612 SP 577129 1 74: 1191 230. ) • 719.'!.5 7/5.2 'lie. y b 788.3 31 Q � W 3 �R 1VER w� OP WAY • 24.70 Acres T. L. I /CO 115TH f• JC � I ^-� o) -jam t. -INTERURBAN 4,0 - TRA,50`s. �g `20 �i c y 'r+ =' Lot 5 -4 6b - - �(A G' 1 - - V ! it H 1 O '33 I I �,� r , nv 1 t I nt 7 0 • :2 cs s1) 5 r) INS 1. L9103• �O i1 i i z _-o -- N0. 50 ORTIO OF TRACT 6, T COURTS & IRAILIR PARR 94 42 0) 0 5 T 2 0 COMPANY of NO' VA OC 16.53 Al Sao MEIER fN W ORIH Air roc SO. LN. N O LN. tACT 4 Cj 0 R 0 ?3 T R. 3 A Filled N (i) ARIA ACT 2 A 0 A 0 AC T— ASSELT D. L.C. NO. 50 cNATT D L. C. NO..38 9160D BRAPI[r rRUCR SAL[ PAR RING M NO. 119 . -- - 65 1 � Il s� «q five, y pep b former D f�riq��,t, Iis/2 ..... ~ ":','►4r \ 0 68 . J n ,\\ ` \ ION 1 r H r A I N ca N MEA 9422 SCRY srA 0 7)2 2? r '1 TRACT 39110 M%A' 2.59 A / /f A � r / / 1 / I/ GE 30 4144; :iiU LI • 41111111 d _En :' -0 itimmr • . 602 4t, (2) , • • jOillillePf P -; 4 Wriefreiggitig,•• -44, 31e0 - 0,0F 1111 416, 441Pill rergIldrdiOra! I NM 11111.1114. • . �tA� , "s "rv:>Scn�A`:ih;i��:1'�5rf.' wX3'��:azds:A; :�87�i•ic.vc;'r:Dr�k.N.�u:: _ oettrsv+ mintiva: rvm�rz< vivxsrncnaawv�u:: e•. t: r. �Y. �ruu: 3CWmc�: zuc' mr .�a+U�rnz.?n�rJxiv�uxbrsaw�m��r sus: a2�! s'+ �v^.& sY�! f. D. Cf3fi: S�?' �' QS: f:' iSLs'S�Pd✓a���F.Y.'�eR�M�`i'dffi' � City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 DATE: DECEMBER 29, 1987 TO: FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW SUBJECT: FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION TASK FORCE DAVE RAY, DUANE GRIFFIN, BECKY DAVIS Thank you for agreeing to meet with the Task Force. You are scheduled for January 5, 1987 at 5:00 p.m., in the Police Training Room, City Hall. The Public Works Department will meet with them on January 12th to discuss their permits and standards, as well as long range utility and transportation planning. The Task Force will want to know what Codes, Ordinances or policies are unique to Tukwila and how fees and processing times relate to King County. Your audience will be broad based with representatives from Boeing to a single - family homeowner. FYC TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433-1800 Gary L. Vanousen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Fire District No. 1 Annexation Task Force Moira Carr Bradshaw December 22, 1987 DECEMBER 15, 1987 MEETING SYNOPSIS The meeting opened with a recap of members' impressions and feedback from the Land Use Open House. Handouts were distributed on proposed Zoning Code text amendments. The discussion centered on two issues: how to provide comparable allowances for mobile homes as is currently available in the county, and what the impact is on Allentown /Duwamish by allowing truck terminals as permitted uses in M -2 zones. The group considered creating either an overlay zone for areas where residential mobile homes would be permitted or a new single - family classification similar to the existing R -1 zone whose purpose would be: 1. To provide residentially annexed areas with comparable housing oppor- tunities that were available to them while in unincorporated King County. 2. To allow housing alternatives more appropriate to the transi- tional nature of lowland residential areas. If the Task Force feels the area is in transition from residential, you may wish to re- examine the Comprehensive Plan designations which continue to show the area as low density residential. I have excerpted a paragraph from the Comprehensive Plan regarding the subject. "The burst of commercial and industrial development and speculative land purchases have spelled decline in some residential areas, particularly in the lowland. Incompatible land uses juxtaposed with residences have dis- couraged the upkeep of these homes and diminished their longevity. Zoning policies sometimes have acted in much the same way. Zoning to 'higher' uses has caused higher property taxes to the residents of these areas and has discouraged the maintenance of existing housing. This is particularly true r ,. MCB /sjn (26/MB.12 -21MS) .,�<.� .. r•. . :,..� w < •r,:;,•;'f "�+.V „d . -.+.�, ; ' ".'�::` ": �C',�'r�'. 1 , -0 :�' ",. MEMORANDUM to: December 22, 1987 Annexation Task Force Page 2 on the south side of the Tukwila Hill where a historically wobbly boundary between multiple- and single- family districts has caused a general decline in single - family homes Yet despite these problems, people are still drawn to the Tukwila area. Its proximity to employment centers and com- mercial services, excellent schools, diversity of housing, and community friendliness still make the Tukwila area a desirable place to live. The key to the future livability of the area lies with the City's ability to mini- mize the adverse impacts of urbanization while maximizing the assets for the benefit of those who call Tukwila 'home'." (page 44) I will draft suggestions for language and text for a code amendment relating to mobile homes. There will be two M -2 districts in the Allentown /Duwamish area: one that will cover the Union Tank Works plant, and one that will cover the Burlington North- ern rail yard and hub center. Any further expansion of truck terminals would be prohibited unless a rezone occurred creating or expanding the M -2 districts in the area. The property owner of land at the corner of 42nd Avenue and South 115th back to Burlington Northern has requested a land use classification other than single - family. The staff feels any use other than residential would cause adverse traffic impacts on the neighborhood. A task force member echoes the same opinion. The property owner indicates that he will pursue his request before the Planning Commission and the City Council during the pre- annexation Comprehensive Plan zoning process. The meetings of January 5th and January 12th will deal respectively with build- ing permits and Public Works engineering and permits. On the 5th, representa- tives from the Building Division and Fire Department will discuss the building permit process. On the 12th, representatives from the Public Works Department will discuss the utility permit process as well as transportation and utility planning for the City. If you have questions already in mind, please call me so that I may brief the department representatives and they are prepared for your specific concerns. Jon Nichols of Rhone Poulence and Ron Altier of Jorgensen Steel offered a tour of their facilities to the Task Force. We'll await dates that are convenient at their plants, then schedule late afternoon tours. FUTURE MEETINGS: January 5, 1988 - 5:00 p.m. January 12, 1988 - 5:00 p.m. Please review your initial list of issues for scheduling of future meeting dates and speakers. Moira Carr Bradshaw zoning code as a single - family unit. Options ,sfx:"+�s�mcm"�x ire:. xi' c, �bv c�:: a�w�. r, eFm ,wt;,�•htrx*rrac+r*r;:uc:N.}s, ;: `�h }:.C/':°;'�;'K�::.. �.,.,,. u+: �r;&' n" ;?,�:EStS ^',:atiSd +':dg:. MOBILE HOMES Mobile homes are a use specifically prohibited in the definition section of the "18.06.240 Dwelling, single family. 'Single - family dwelling' means a detached residential dwelling unit other than a mobile home, designed for and occupied by one family only. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982)." They are allowed in mobile home parks as an unclassified use. If an individual mobile home occupies a lot and the property is then annexed, it would be reviewed under the following section. Referring to 18.70.050(5), residential structures or uses in any residential zoning district shall not be considered nonconforming in terms of use, bulk or density and may be rebuilt after fire or other natural disaster to their original dimensions. 1. No change, which allows the use as conforming and allows rebuilding to original dimensions after a disaster. No mobile homes on lots that did not previously have one and no increase in size on replacement of homes. 2. Allow upgrade of homes after a disaster to a class equal to or higher than currently exists on the site. Classes are assigned by HUD who is responsible for inspection and standards for mobile homes. .f" „` ':J`•+ .,... ..�.,. '+.4!tl`4 °' ✓7 .hYR.,� r.,.Z:. .,...,,............ �...,.,,...,•" s.'... a.iP` •..Ja.. ,.., d +. �"ti..n.... ,i �3�s�: W Class A mobile home: each 12 inches of run, or about 25 percent. a. Mobile Home, Class A - A manufactured home used as a permanent residence, manufactured after June 15, 1976, exhibiting conform- ance with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) standards, and having the general appearance of conventional "stick- built" homes based on the following minimum standards. The ' v1 (1) Shall not be less than 24'feet in width with exterior dimen- sions enclosing a space of at least 960 square feet. 7 (2) Shall have a minimum roof pitch of at least a 3 -inch rise for (3) Shall have roofing material that is commonly used on houses built to the Uniform Building Code (UBC) (e.g., composition or wood shingles or tile as used on conventional "stick- built" housing). (4) Shall be placed on an excavated (pitted) foundation or a ` ground level foundation that appears similar to the concrete Fi l,, foundations of houses built to the UBC; or shall have contin- f if uous skirting that, in design, color, and texture, appears to <l r I } be an integral part of the exterior walls or the foundation of the mobile home. 1) . . 1 ' '.r !t l�+f • r (5) Shall have exterior siding that is commonly used on houses built to the UBC, including vertical and lap siding consist- ing of wood, masonite, or aluminum materials. Exterior siding shall be finished in such a manner that the reflection from such siding shall not be greater that from siding coated with clean, white, gloss exterior enamel. "P t TJ ;rrc 5:. '•' u ,. s . .;v $ ^ 44: • •: , µ ... ms •.�s ?.5....J.C�sy rG "�`,S rJ +i .,.r � , � :.,, ,•� ;,;4��:✓.tt.�_., . -:rai iae�.7"A+a7.i'.F�rSt r ,r ... .. ... - .�.nx:):t�,•i'.... ,.�.�. S: Pii l;r._.wsr;'.ttti+e ^e^ut.�CSGtn,. iA�abevilhd- z:M�C:crr•. ..'� -vr:. v'�n•'J�1c. F�r%vny�K.v..� t. ..x ::;:.;f:ll ht7. ...,A S[•.. M�tt R's. 7Tr tt.xor3 (26 /USE.MOBILE) (6) Shall have any towing device removed. b. Mobile Home, Class B - A manufactured home used as a permanent residence, manufactured after June 15, 1976, indicating conform- ance with HUD standards. The Class B mobile home: l (1) Shall not be less than ) feet wide with exterior dimensions enclosing a space of not less than 500 square feet. (2) Shall have skirting unless the mobile home is set on an excavated (pitted) foundation. (3) Shall have any towing device removed or hidden from view. c. Mobile Home, Class C - A mobile homes used as a permanent residence, manufactured after September 1, 1969. The mobile home shall exhibit an "Insignia of Compliance ", which indicates conformance with state standards in effect at the time of manu- facture. d. Mobile Home, Class D - A mobile home used as a permanent residence and manufactured before September 1, 1969, or manufactured after September 1, 1969, and not meeting the criteria set forth for Class A, Class B, or Class C mobile homes. 3. Allow mobile homes outright as permitted uses as a single - family dwell- ing unit. An additional option would be to limit the class of new mobile homes to the highest HUD standard. ; tail' A'..:: a° d:, iX:: i(. i% n i Ja'::,.... r: sr:.'. i a ..ui.Y..J1'v�kern:tineh6.:.rHa. ..r�....au,:_.,..1a7i. r:.. ...;;+:::_....i ..... -�. .; Y: 'Ore`1+'a�:e�rrRmyYme#4•coxr.+n srs :�r�;,ante..<e���n: /Y'0. Y.nt15�:�d?RJ 4 tC' ' k"J' XL" ih;.'. T ;::�i�VYCS'rv�. >�il'rt; ?XZ•Mt Existing Proposed (26 /USE.HEIGHT) HEIGHT EXCEPTION AREA The Tukwila Zoning code on page 290 designates on a map areas of the City where heights may exceed the height limits of the underlying zone. Amend Map 2 (page 290) to show the annexation area and the area north of the Duwamish River designated for heights up to 115 feet. The FAA has protected airspace for Boeing Field /King County International in this same area which varies in height from the surface up to 167 feet. Any structure which exceeds the underlying height limit of the zoning district would be required to submit a Notice of Proposed Construction to the FAA Airport District Office. The protected airspace does not follow property lines and is diffi- cult to apply to typical zoning maps. Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.50.030, Building Height, up to 115 feet permitted outright. 18.50.030 Building height up to one hundred fifiteen feet permitted outright. Structures may be erected up to and including 115 feet in that area of the city located south of Interstate 405 and east of Interstate 5 and the area of the City located north of the Duwamish River along East Marginal Way and the Boeing Access Road as shown on Map 2. (Ord 1247 §1(part), 1982)." /.- =,� {t' : gf.%',rtg3Ft ',p l.. .,�,. „r. ;.— t y. .Wr. . :e . . - �.' 3 .�t$�A�i�}j1 ;....hZ..t..A.11 ? -a. «tsl�ME 3'1.1 ��a�.�. Fi, :.:.+%.[Ir.. tai' �: v-. �. ��- t�:- tr ............. aa.;;: ui. Gr. S:. �. Lat?. l+ i,: iT.:. Y�3: SY�Y%•..'. Y�fri ..1 }"1�LiJ1:7 }ryV.M.li'.. -.I1 x�... �Ki31. a�q: vf: srWlG+ FY.: a�rN"J. Vk til£+ ' u' l: ti^ 7b. S: R(! �:!. �`!. 5- 4Y'f tSYSC¢: Y .':k�tCY!'.k�'H:f'.I. ».� -... Existing Proposed STEEL MANUFACTURING A distinction is made in the M -2 zone regarding metal processing that re- quires a conditional use permit for smelting, blast furnaces, drop forging, or drop hammering. Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.42.020 to read: Discussion The above amendments are proposed to make a distinction between reprocessing of raw ore, which is usually associated with blast furnaces and smelting. The additional verbiage is processes currently in use in the area that are distinct from drop hammering or forging. (26 /USE.STEEL) "(4) The manufacturing, processing, assembling and /or packaging of previously manufactured metals including, but not limited to, iron and steel fabrication produced by electric arc melting, argon oxygen refin- ing, and consumable electrode melting, structural iron or pipe works, stamping, dyeing, shearing, punching, open die hammer, or press forging of metal, wire and rod mills, chain and cable manufacturing, and the manufacture of cans, fasteners, bolts, and screws." ii tea' ,�f..�; -0y ?J,' y ,. e��r: e:; °'•'f'y'FC'w'r: #'`5•"t,;�: err: ?a: .. 'xs - �r• u. cur y M,.a� ; 0 , �:. s.- .YY ?:01,Fa N ,L`. — , t>Neer.3:?'F."".;:.r`'AtF•.� t`.. 2:, � fitr'.' t25.? kbS;: iSI V?TW ei; tiM! !'?.,xidYAYl»-..;tci:^EIRi.r:Mcl r,�X."•.Y7Z'� •. J,.: �s�. s'# I�... S��N: �ukz�" rti,.?•!. e. a. aa. o�.. d:. �e. �. d.,.,.:. ,�a:ii....a�....lx......,'.fi:7 ;.i:KiCs�: �ti�...�..,.$ a.....t'�..• f.7s 1�;o`.t;^"t, H. tiF u�F ..... Proposal Discussion (26 /USE.TRNSIT) C TRANSIT OPERATING BASE Amend (shown in bold print) TMC 18.42.030 to read: "18.42.030 Accessory uses. Uses and structures customarily appurtenant to the principally permitted uses, such as service, repair and training activities. (Ord. 1247 §1(part), 1982)." The existing code does not directly address all facets of the use. The operation resembles the permitted and accessory uses associated with truck terminals and manufacturing of heavy transportation equipment, which are both permitted. Assembling, servicing, repairing, storage and offices are all allowed as permitted or accessory uses. Training of drivers appears to be as principal as the other activities of the METRO operation. Training however is never directly mentioned outright or as accessory in any zone within the code. < 1: S ?7.%,i::3:.i:14.0)IAi'l'rAuL<-� ravr ret xJ US ?k0!";; tSS' �ui ".i JWttwitMAYk::- Ive,, fet, NX.- Pog+ frrin fR1.% n..! eli ,,.'o1MFd:,nmermtiKILIMIXIX 114!:, :i.`iVS',17:Cfra. Existing Truck terminals are conditional uses in CM, M -1 and M -2 zones. Proposed Amend TMC 18.42.020, Principally Permitted Uses, by adding "(7) Truck Ter- minals and railroad freight or classification yards. Delete TMC 18.42.040 Conditional Use (4). Discussion A large number of businesses operate truck terminals in the annexation area. The impacts associated with the use include large numbers of truck trips, large paved sites for storage, maintenance and servicing; and possi- bly storage /warehousing of goods. The areas of M -2 zoning are isolated and away from residential areas except for the rail yard and Burlington Northern Hub Center in Allentown. The impacts, primarily noise, aesthetic, truck congestion on roads are similar to other M -2 uses such as manufacturing, processing, and assembling heavy transportation vehicles and equipment. The use also fits within the purpose section of the M -2 district. (26 /USE.TRUCK) C TRUCK TERMINALS ' . • .......... ..:..f ... .:' .....s. ;:..........:. -.. .. .... ...... • .. YTl;tr: ;'S� :IyJ. "i _> �r.>W7., ^ . r' ^�'.ti �.�ii.av:tv..l �!6.t..,,Srr:,::�.1`d{ �[�. ..u..:•,a:v_...1 .. .. .. r, ..,. "< \�n.s. ...._.......n. „'Y`:,. ,.�yS.r: ..."�t':.n: >7 ai:R:� -.: ,. _,,.+�'A7.:u+.:c:':,n :d..... ..... xie.�. "�"..'.a�ltTa "�, :... �a. ,�..y ......... ,.. wt -.:,. .,..... .....,,.�., �.. ..o .„.., .. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor TO: Annexation Task Force Members FROM: Moira Carr Bradshaw DATE: December 11, 1987 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: TUESDAY, DECEMBER 15 MEETING 5:00 P.M., POLICE TRAINING ROOM The Land Use Open House generated some good questions and responses to the pro- posed map amendments. 61 people attended the fire station meeting, but only a handful appeared at the Rainier View Community Club. Forty -five questionnaires were completed. All of the people who responded were owners of property in the area. Seventy -five percent of the respondents were from the Allentown /Foster Point area and 68% had owned property (and expected to remain) for 10 years or longer. Fifty -five percent were in the age range of 36 -65 years, and 28% were older than 65. A split percentage - 48% - had made major improvements to their properties in the last five years and 37% versus 46% planned on making future improvements. (Seventeen percent did not comment.) The following are ratings on the quality of the living or working environment. 15% - very desirable 33% - desirable 28% - neutral 8% - undesirable 6% - very undesirable It is difficult to generalize on people's individual responses but the major- ity felt land use in their areas should stay the way they are whether it was Allentown or Empire Way. I did talk with a few property owners who felt the Allentown and Foster Point areas should be more intensely developed. Others felt that the existing heavy industrial uses made the area undesirable and would like them removed and have the area stay the way it is with more single family. The written comments regarding possible improvements suggested better regulation of nuisance complaints regarding unkempt properties, i.e., junk cars in yards, and upgrade of services. '. SawaYf 'irk'.' r i� 5�'a'7sr`v 'i" . t ;d • MEMORANDUM to: MCB /sjn attachment (26 /MB.12 -11M) .triVVIVAtailallitirAtt c x.e.,.iivtre .,+..... . ..,....+.— ,.s,...,...........+ , rzwzrtw:urar cioxs rmaalmo Sh1iY,!li1"<3' 75,`t 3's "tiM `'-".ISM: yrv""'"MMILUML "M1 December 11, 1987 Annexation Task Force Members Page 2 For Tuesday, I will have prepared verbiage for the following proposed zoning text amendments: M -2 - Height Exception Areas M -2 - Move truck terminal from conditional use to permitted use M -2 - Alter language for steel processing and provide language for training facilities R -1 — Address existing mobile homes being used on individual lots for single - dwelling units. Any additional changes should be raised for discussion. A final Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Map should be recommended. Shoreline Program amendment to allow piers and moorage / (446e u__,6 Moira Carr Bradshaw December 11, 1987 Gogerty & Stark, Inc. Business /Public Affairs Consultants Ms. Moira Bradshaw Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Moira: 2505 Third Avenue Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98121 (206) 728 -6100 This letter is an attempt to clarify my concerns about the "transitional zone" issues. As you know, large industrial companies have major investments in facilities in the northern part of the annexation area. As times change, so do some of their needs. Boeing, specifically, must adapt to rapidly changing needs. Both technological advances and success in getting developmental contracts have caused major changes in recent years. As a result, we are interested in as much flexibility as possible. When we look to the future, we know there will be some change to facilities currently owned or leased as well as the prospect of expansion and change of use in other facilities which we might purchase or lease. We also know the trend is to locate facilities housing such "white collar" functions as research near our "blue collar" production facilities. This leads to a mixture of typically commercial uses with heavy industrial uses. Traditional zoning views this mixture as bad. We, however, it as a need which will have to be addressed in the future. types of zoning could result. First, we expect to buy or lease facilities which will have changes in use over time. They would be "transitional ", with mixed uses resulting as a function of the process of change. Second, we would expect to buy or lease facilities which purposely have mixed uses. Those would be the sites with combinations of different land uses needed to address specific project needs. The first case would likely be handled by conditional uses; the second might need a different form of regulatory treatment. The C -M Industrial Park zone does not appear to specifically fill the bill. The statement of purpose in 18.38.010 seeks to avoid "nuisance" activities typically associated with the heavy indus- n �_.:' see ,,)' Two n qI CL f C�. 445 I. Ms. Moira Bradshaw December 11, 1987 Page 2 trial aspects of our operations. It also states the district is to be "park- like" with "stringent land development requirements such as setbacks and landscaping." Clearly, the nature of our heavy industrial operations is beyond any definition of "park- like" outside of Seattle's Gas Works Park. The best result might be a strict application of the concept of "cascading" the zoning to include everything in each lesser zone as you do in your text. M -2 subsumes M -1 which subsumes C -2 which subsumes C -1, meaning uses permitted in C -1 are permitted in M -2. This would give us a full range of development potential and seem to satisfy our concerns. Finally, there remains the underlying issue: what direction will development take? Just as we know we must deal with change on a regular basis, we know there will be pressures for change throughout this district. With some minor technical modifications, it appears the heavy industrial zones of Tukwila and King County are comparable enough so there are few problems in changing from pre- existing M -H to M -2 facilities. It is the prospect of expansion of _i_ndu,s,tri.al...us.es....to the south that raises theolicy Perhaps as we address potential amendments to the comprehensive plan, we might create a framework for assessing any new category of zoning. Some of the properties currently zoned at less inten- sive levels might logically be considered for future conversion to more intensive uses. The use of a "transitional zone" might make sense if that planning decision is made. Over the course of the next month, we might be able to review the implications of these issues especially as they pertain to public capital investment plans. The zoning open house brought those issues into perspective relative to the We -st Marginal Way widening project. We would anticipate a number of others will be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, again adding dimension to the broader zoning concepts. Thank you for all your help to date. Sincerely, C R.W. Wilkinson Jr. RWW /jab Gogerty & Stark, Inc. Business /Public Affairs Consultants TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Fire District No. 1 Annexation Task Force Moira Carr Bradshaw November 19, 1987 NOVEMBER 17, 1987 MEETING SYNOPSIS The meeting started with a discussion comparing the King County and Tukwila Shoreline Programs (see handout). Setback and height are the primary characteristics of the programs. The equalizer between the two programs on setbacks is a required 30 -foot easement for flood and riverbank protection landward from top of bank or from edge of flood plain. The 35 -foot height limit does not extend the entire 200 feet in Tukwila as it does in King County. Any development within the Shoreline Environment in Tukwila other than single - family does require Board of Architectural Review (BAR). An amendment to include the King County regulations on piers and mooring facilities could be proposed to accommodate these uses which are not currently addressed in the Tukwila program. Otherwise, uses of the underlying zones are the permitting uses within Shorelines. Ms. Davis raised a question regarding easement dedication and its effect on property value and taxes. Mr. Lauren Clark, Manager of the King County Depart- ment of Assessment's Appraisal Division, said that is could affect the value. They base their assessment on the market value of property and would find a comparable property in the region to determine the price of the land. When substantial development ($2,500 or more) occurs, both the County and Tukwila require flood /riverbank protection easements adjacent to residential and commer- cial properties. Access in the form of a 15 -foot wide crushed rock or gravel drive would not normally be required in residential developments. The Task Force then reviewed the proposed zoning map (see map) which provides comparable Tukwila zoning classifications to King County classifications. The outstanding zoning issues to be discussed and decided by the Task Force include: 1. Providing comparable heights from King County M -L and M -H to Tukwila M -1 and M -2 zones. tea: rF ht.ct�3thf1A ta;aair':sx a czrn,u!2ca�n rrvs.,^nvv�;tti� i:izra� �£�r.tT &S gLt�nia,cs of t ? i SktU`( `w6 mt + SkA ix'iTte ai : s tir , (26 /MB.11 -17MS) iff#a;, MEMORANDUM to: November 19, 1987 Annexation Task Force Page 2 2. Designating single - family residential lot sizes. 3. Permitting truck terminals in M -2 zones versus conditional use permitting. 4. Redefinition of steel manufacturing and processing. 5. Requiring Board of Architectural Review (BAR) of industrial development adjacent or across the street from residential properties. 6. Amending Tukwila's shoreline program to provide for piers, moors, etc. The Task Force will be receiving notices in the mail regarding the Land Use Open House on the 8th and 9th of December. You are urged to attend to speak with the residents and businessmen about the land use proposals. We will have name tags for members so you can be identified with the Task Force and approached with comments or questions. The 15th of December will be a wrap -up from the open house with conclusions and recommendations of the Task Force regarding the land use issues. We will not meet on November 24th or December 1st. After the 15th of December, I suggest we reconvene on January 5th. The next item for discussion could be Regulations /Codes /Permitting. Happy Thanksgiving! Moira Carr ra sha ±� . � ira' w. w.» M ii 2 .' �L: rkiS 6: �i' k�h i.+, wa. un: nn., �e.,.,. �..+_,......,....._-...._....... ...............,........�....M, SETBACK USE 20 /SHORESUM TUKWILA Urban 40 feet mean high water mark (9,000 cfs.) HEIGHT 30 foot flood control easement from top of bank 35 feet, low impact environment Underlying zone high impact environment Underlying uses in low and high impact environ- ments SHORELINE PROGRAMS KING COUNTY Urban /Rural Non water related commercial/ industrial: t Y 2 ttM!4= .M='AWAMJMTt!!. t§F.'!ttrO '..(. 50 feet from ordinary high water mark or edge of floodway. 20 feet from floodway with limited public acess. 10 feet or edge of floodway with public access. Single Family Residential: 20 feet from ordinary high water mark or floodway. 150 sq. ft. & 8 feet in height or less accessory structures may sit in setback. 35 feet, entire shoreline unless water related or water dependent Underlying uses ISSUES: (1) Pier, moorage, float or launch facility, public boat launching (2) BAR review TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: t City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor Fire District No. 1 Annexation Task Force Moira Carr Bradshaw � -� y'�4 November 16, 1987 NOVEMBER 10, 1987 MEETING SYNOPSIS Carol Chan from King County Community Planning discussed the three -tier planning system used in King County. She handed out guides to the County's Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan provides general goals for the entire County. The Highline Plan, the second tier, is a community plan and was adopted in 1979. The Highline Plan is devoted to land use and zoning and is designed to be con- sistent with the overall policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The third tier of planning in the County is the functional plans such as their Transportation, Basin and Solid Waste plans. Carol also discussed the County's policy regarding annexations. Although King County strives to provide urban level services if possible; it will also support moves toward annexation. Three review criteria are used by the County in its annexation analysis: 1. Demonstration of community support for the annexation. 2. Extensions of City boundaries which are logical. 3. Creation of comparable City land use plans and zoning for an area. Part of the County's support of annexations is their use of interlocal agree- ments. The types of items covered in interlocals include: • Land use • Development permit review • Roads • Parks and open space • Wetlands • Historic landmarks • Utilities /public services • Administrative agreements 32 MEMORANDUM ::;�? "n �,;��.,� ,.. �< °.. "...`......�.".:; 491•• S> I.", �'. r', ��::` x% v T;. vo ... A_. �,.`,!' Y1t`"• Y..'.�::'<'ii,�..`�`•1•..�' "... . LC • n i f »J... f. i. i�r•+'.`f:^�f)Y: .•T :h7ftr:^.:i7)li'.J:'.Y�. .:rcr y.•ry.V1i'.. �.: ,.,ia Ets. ':t.w• :`'fy? w 'N.!. ?ts:' n ; e - 1 4 r.S 1., � ( x. Js -„ i S �'.x <J.'��na�..f;`lt>rt:{... '.sti�b.l`uds i�. �`,. ��' ��: flc• �' ti�A. �i' tGv' ��', �k- Y�Id� .�d4h.94M.:6rh:?`lY. � «.;k?A >u�. F7_ �':Y B?; 1:!,°,. AA��a 'w��'T��'4:7!:w�Ta >ft:.,u�+L�P:t�;':1�� ��cc �'�..:'4�.1•:e, ,�t,, yw�+t_�,. Is�L, �y ,yy� Al ,Pr 4> �'K..i'}L; ^'��:in1+ 4f.''.J'tt'- �.i�C'7 §F��t.., MEMORANDUM to: November 16, 1987 Annexation Task Force Page 2 The discussion then moved on to the proposed Comprehensive Plan for the area. The concern seemed to center on the Allentown, Proverty Hill area of the map which is shown as low density residential and the adjacent heavy industrial designations. The lack of transitional uses was noted and then a query was made about What the community, living in the area, wanted. Are they happy as is, or would they like to see less intense uses between them and the railroad hub cen- ter and Union Tank Works? A note was made by Mr. Ramey about who the people in the area are renters or property owners. The task force agreed that alternate plans should be proposed for the public meeting in December to foster discussion of the possibilities. The meeting adjourned around 7:00 p.m. Future meeting dates are: (26 /MB.MTGSYNP) November 17, 1987 December 1, 1987 The Land Use Public Open House will be on December 8th and 9th, 5:00 - 7:00 p.m. The specific recommendations on the zoning districts and standards will be discussed on the 17th. Moira Carr Bradshaw uRp�,,i :�j�;�yi «.lyii5t.`.•7:'rlt•tia ^. ';�1 .: :'"NN.rl. w ",r•F : .y Y:v..' ea .:.�. .�,. nr: i r vy�a: -� rr. •�t "iN ^n ti' „ +1 .r.; xL•r.. l G""L ^� ;yl P:I y '.'.��:t4 r�. Fc . y r �,'�i. +� +lr.��iv..3zea.t,... ant<` ,.y�.�.s.:r�sS,'.�.°.��Y�:d'�.e �r �.'�.'"a",w13� °,�.ct�_�;a:> �; �,'k.. �� .`•�r 7 �.- r��.�.;- �' °�:�. uL+� � (. . s:,-ai<s et,_ .51.,1.1" {t,uo�..'• Enclosure City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 433 -1849 DATE: NOVEMBER 5, 1987 TO: TASK FORCE - FIRE DISTRICT #1 FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW - PLANNING DEPT. SUBJECT: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FIRE DISTRICT #1 NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 10,1987, 5:00 P.M. POLICE TRAINING ROOM Enclosed is a proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Amendment. Please compare it with the existing one you received Monday night in the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan. There are modifications to the existing plan. The approach used in creating the amended plan is to start with existing land use documents /maps and recognize existing uses in the area. Carol Chan, King County Community Planner for the Highline Plan will be making a brief presentation Tuesday night. She will be prepared to answer questions about the County planning process and the Highline Plan. �e.:_r�.tclit is { <.[a, Cl4,., T s.'�vf� ^ : gggg , ,,,�, . t. .eysm.. .. ,gy • -•.wue+^e {{ ; k ::� mss,. rn . m s „•„ i` t ` °�.r. r Y: r'( `+` , i`:F.i.%w ; t s �. S. �;. „ � "f' "�:., x= '��:n•. , ve ; ia;'t .� h �":"�. fi r ?f, a. �. ::isi ' _. J, z. 51�,... �>. �. z wi }., r �iil•• s'.; i:. �i:;_...-.. �;_.•.,,.'', �. r._..,. trY...,,.... �. f�i% ;�;r�Y:;: {t--•-.....,.i;�#i:nl. ��::. s...,. �,.. �,,,.• �� ...,. �x ��,,,. r.<... ��£::: e:,.•: 4......�."� h' �:, ,,.:.',�'".�..�5�..�;5"•9„n,s•. PARKING SPACES MP /ML /MH - CM /M -1 /M -2 Warehouse /Manufacturing Freight Terminals Warehouses LANDSCAPING YARDS (depth in feet) (26 /FD1.COMPAR) • Fire District No. 1 Annexation ZONING CODE COMPARISONS KING COUNTY TUKWILA Residential: Single - family 2 2 Multiple- family 1.5 2 BN /BC - C1 -C2 (Office /Retail) 1 per 200 sq. ft. 1 per 400 sq. ft. 1 per 1,000 sq. ft, or 1 per 1,000 sq. ft. 1 per 3 employees, whichever is more 1 for each 2 employees 1 for each 2 employees KING COUNTY Multiple residential: Front 20 15 Side & 5 - 20, depending on 5 Rear adjacent zone 5 BN -MH Front 8 Side & 10 - 20 depending on Rear adjacent zone C -1 /C -2 Front 10 Side 5 MP - CM Front 25 15 Side 5 M -1 /M -2 Front 15 (1) Special parking lot landscaping requirements. (2) Additional landscaping required when locating adjacent to residential districts. TUKWILA .ti ... •. ... .., ,:4 ..... �,'.ru. <:...,.. .•:.:, ..:.- : :..., :r.r wq:•r '.n;n.• ,.r. Tr'i. r .t... ^c .v,r. .f« •.,r+ .0 : .�. ..�„ ,., t ' �, ,� 7t. ?,Yt. � ��;r *�S't••i`,,a, .:�; x , n K.� 'e;:t: ", .•',�y»;�rm;•. e• ..a* =!'�r .`[�,.,,,. :6:0':.r:•.inasai =:.. .0 -t.o:: T'Eh�'�. S..QO!7i.f s: \ L'vui 6. ,.. � , �:� , . . ...,.. .. .. .. s�:.. ::. ,. ..... c..., .. .. y .. ...Z-Y, �p., .. a'. :••:G� ..t., I.t)i4tY %:�f4'.S i..L:h .�.. .. I.a.�>(11. .wfr �.: � �: t� .'+J .+, ;t.�r ia.�`..�:�. ?� :.. ,C x� �= 'Z.:3'ia..G.c..t �.r�....f..n?I KING COUNTY CITY OF TUKWILA (26 /FD1.NONCON) Fire District No. 1 Annexation NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES AND USES A nonconformance is a structure or use that becomes nonconforming to the zoning code as a result of changes made to the code after the structure or use is established. Changes to the structure may be made if the change will make the structure more conforming. However, if a structure is nonconforming only because of substandard yards, open spaces area, or height, any structural alterations are permitted as long as the amount of nonconformance is not increased. A noncon- forming structure may be restored to its nonconforming status if it is destroyed by not more than 50% of the fair market value. If a nonconforming use is discontinued for a continuous period of more than one year, all future uses shall be conforming. If notified, certain nonconforming uses must be discontinued or improved to meet standards within a specified time period (ranging from one to ten years) from the date of notification. Nonconforming uses must conform if the use ceases for a period of two years. An existing nonconforming use may not be moved or enlarged, however the Board of Adjustment may approve a change to another nonconforming use if they find the change would be more appropriate for the zone. Changes may be made to a nonconforming structure as long as the degree of non- conformity is not increased. If a structure is destroyed by more than 50% of its replacement cost or abandoned for longer than 2 years, it must be brought into conformance with its zone. Residential structures and uses located in any residential zoning district and in existence at the time of annexation may be built after a fire or other disaster to its original dimensions and bulk. Sites with nonconforming parking must be brought into conformance when a pro- posed change requires an increase of greater than 100% of its existing parking and with nonconforming landscaping any time there is a proposed change in the structure or use. Lot Width: Front Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Height Limit: (26 /FD1.TCLAS) .. 4 +1v,,4 3:h dj { i, +�' .�� 7.�. ts;•: �:;f::�R: F�,`".tnV,l'r "S:a.�;'.fili, t, :`:dye: �; . .Ck:. • cars: 5 .: �r, a:l....,.,.. 1tcS+ ..��..:,���....5:.:,,x:cx..._.1 .... ..;r. • �t" t.,. M...,.' G.'. .,.5 {:�y,.t,Y. �:�'i��,..v.cd:{�,... R -1 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENCE Fire District No. 1 Annexation TUKWILA SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION Purpose: To stabilize and preserve low density, single - family residential neighbor- hoods; to prevent intrusions by incompatible land uses. Permitted Uses: 1. One single - family dwelling per lot. 2. Public parks and playgrounds not including amusement parks, golf courses or commercial recreation. Accessory Uses: 1. Private garages /carports not exceeding 1,000 square feet and located on the same lot as the principal use. 2. Private stable with conditions. 3. Home occupations. 4. Lodging /boarding for not more than two persons. 5. Noncommercial greenhouses and storage sheds. Conditional Uses: 1. Churches and community centers 2. Public and private schools 3. Public libraries 4. Public museums or art galleries 5. Fire and police stations 6. Public utility or substations 7. Transit shelter stations 8. Water towers Lot Sizes: Area: 7,200 to 20,000 square feet 50 feet 30 feet 10% of lot's width 10 feet 30 feet per lot Mobile homes permitted in mobile home parks only. depending on zone. .. S �.�,•. ..Y,. 'N: ti`• :.°14 ."✓A a tlW'r�'i.45' .. �' ''��1' -- d +i .h'•r,c.. ..y >.., ` - j`,1 •. ,;`tC .,L,.. F..�,, ;''t„x,. .. r ,..a -� ....Ir: :'j: ,w.e7._ .,:.[ �: n. n.•: t:.nt..i....::.:f.`�,��r:.'S:,J .., r: e.i.,. ....a.i�l�, . �;`" �• rm: ,...rsi..�t ,. t.,L"..z5�,.- .�i '�::=r�� .. Lot Width: Front Yard: Side Yard: Rear Yard: Height Limit: Lot Coverage: Side & Rear: Fire District No. 1 Annexation KING COUNTY SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATIONS .,.. N k_`. Gn' Yw.. ��u. l.. eJY:{.:• a_ u�. tl3: :�::> °�f.�:l!:G'Sa.lr�,Y'1 ?9'� +w���..1:�.. x.t���. � .:r RS SINGLE FAMILY Purpose: To create a living environment of the highest standards for single - family dwellings. Make it possible more efficiently and economically to design, install and maintain all physical public service facilities in terms of size and capacity to meet defined intensity of land and use. Permitted Uses: 1. One- family dwelling 2. Two - family dwelling under certain conditions 3. Townhouses within a subdivision Accessory Uses Permitted: 1. Accessory dwelling 2. Accessory quarters 3. Radio towers, amateur 4. Day nurseries with conditions 5. Beehives 6. Churches with conditions 7. Schools with conditions 8. Commuter parking lots 9. Private garages to accommodate not more than 4 cars Conditional Uses: Water reservoirs Lot Area: 7,200 square feet Subdivisions allow lot size averaging and attached units. 60 feet 20 feet 5 feet 5 feet 30 feet 35 percent 5 Mobile home permit on any legal lot in an R and S zone. �. rs ' ..> > 1 t . a Sr�t.f: �i�•e, +t" ...�.,., � rt ;;+, .r..l�r1 •:.-,�.� .'t.; .k: .;r,,.r � �,e, etc �,..� ,�t*:.F� '.a:...,.r.,,i3rr .1`t,_,.,n..',.r..�:. :,5'�:Flrl'.`,.._,:e..L ,:... r4J:. .... ... ....? r.ti:.�.f .. eis.: ?E�s` :d. r.,., ......:6a :. ..... .. .... ..', -i i'', ,�.k.. .r.A.., ,_. z.,.. �. v.._...�,...7•v ° ?,,..,.c_A:S .,r.,.�.:_....S a�.,a..,a . S -R SUBURBAN- RESIDENTIAL King County Single - Family Residential Classifications Page 2 Purpose: Provide orderly transition of areas presently largely suburban in character but are rapidly becoming urbanized. Within S -R, residences may locate in combination with generally small -scale and intensive agricultural pursuits on a commercial basis. Application is intended to apply to areas in a transitional stage, or expected to change in light of increasing need for urban development. Permitted Uses: 1. Any use permitted in R and S zones. 2. Swimming, tennis and yacht clubs subject to a conditional use permit. Lot Sizes: Minimum size: 5 acres (NOTE: Minimum area may be reduced in proposed new multiple lot subdivi- sions subject to the following guidelines. (26 /FD1.KCCLAS) A. 7,200 square feet or 9,600 square feet when: (1) All lots are served by public sewers. (2) All lots are served by public water. (3) All lots are served by paved streets with curbs, sidewalks, and underground storm drainage consistent with KCC Title 19. B. 15,000 square feet when: (1) All lots are served by public or private water. (2) All lots are served by an approved sewage disposal system. (3) All lots are served by paved streets and walkways consistent with KCC Title 19. C. 35,000 square feet when: (1) All lots are served by public or private water. (2) All lots are served by an approved sewage disposal system. Lot Width: Lot area less than 9,600 sq. ft. - 60 feet Lot area less than 35,000 sq. ft. - 70 feet Front Yard: Lot area less than 35,000 sq. ft. - 20 feet Height: 30 feet Lot Coverage: 35% Side & Rear: Lot area less than 35,000 sq. ft. - 5 feet Lot area more than 35,000 sq. ft. - 10 feet ^a� kra.. Rr�' itg ✓Jofs.= �iu:c.: +.�? .`.�, m _.... ;:. �zD� RS -7200 (BN) No - 4 ter' ��w «.y. •t' ' , +! r i a., r„ �{ S yr l fr r h .R Ur •'N, ..yq,q .W T.w .(^.",. t�l ��Kli �.._..�.�i: i> t� -.v. e: V.. ,� e. .:`! ..S •i .L L... :��it. Yr .n °x�K��F�- '�.`�� V ' i'f.`U 1 x�il �i .:�2L. ,i k' :.I. t�.::?.�t�t g.: c`! al !- .51�J.1i .`� +......iwv�`�t��.S.! ^,V. ^.�{. vi�t..��. FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 USES EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? BN Yes Riverside Interiors C -1 11520 - 42nd Avenue South Carpets showroom, small warehouse BN No Duwamish Apartments R -4 Yes 11602 - 42nd Avenue South 4 units SR Yes Duwamish Community Church R -1 CU 11814 - 42nd Avenue South BN Yes Allentown Superette C -1 Yes 12404 - 42nd Avenue South MP Yes Union Tank Works M -H Yes 12424 - 42nd Avenue South Manufacture steel tanks BN Yes Bob's Market C -1 Yes 10359 - 51st Avenue South Groceries Rays Auto Clinic R -1 -7.2 No 10401 - 51st Avenue South 'C -2 Yes Repair transmissions engine RM -1800 Yes Rainier View Community Club R -4 CU 10715 - 51st Avenue South RM -1800 Yes Mauna Kea Apartments R -4 Yes 11133 - 51st Avenue South 57 units sr M -p Yes Pitardi Construction C -M Yes 12218 - 51st Place S. Contractors storage equipment repairs M -P Yes Eagle Systems M -2 Yes 12400 - 51st Place S. TA Container trucking gas /repair /store trucks M -P Yes BN Puget Sound Hub Center M -2 Yes 12400 - 51st Place S. TA Freight handling offices ^f,: ., .<..•eb:r.:. '.'.1 „ •� - h >:;:1 s. ^. .' e:fN x•,.' /, rY"( ;'Ia43Tiv. JY >.f '<y .vf ?' "� • 'i'Y.. Ti:r.3 4••. ": :.rwar .'t rv��..�4`...,)w u_ r. Y;u. .;T.{ <, r•,)s '� .tY.A.. C ` ^ _R ^ }, efl":'...gvy "f; Yla v.,••• rN;;'. � �. °• ..'flC;: '.:: .. 'L... .: a..�r.:,stua: �:t >•'.�:a t..C.n�r .�,r•.�i #:.•?t.. nt .._.:iry,'* G %� ..�i: X.: •e'w: d...�� �f ry. ,. t „�`e.l:�:. .Z`i....� '�:ar.;'r : >t�d. ".r:, z...�i:',4t t. �»l.f ., >>s�,_Yx�.•. ..f, .?si ,a .:a,. �. �rm�+.� :�`i ••+... EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? RS -7200 Yes Kingdom Hall 10201 Beacon Avenue Church Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 2 R -1 -7.2 CU M -H Yes Spider Staging M -2 Yes 13536 Beacon Coal Mine Road Manufacture scaffolding Aluminum pipes and welding M -H Yes Statewide Rent -a -Fence M -2 Yes 13728 Beacon Coal Mine Road Cyclone storage M -H UCU King County Airport M -2 UCU 8200 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Jorgenson Steel M -2 Yes 8536 East Marginal Way Scrap metal reprocessing M -H Yes Boeing M -2 Yes 8541 East Marginal Way Aircraft assembly M -H Yes Kenworth Truck M -2 Yes 8801 East Marginal Way Manufacture trucks M -H UCU Boeing M -2 UCU 8900 East Marginal Way FAA Hangers M -H UCU Westside T. Hangers M -2 UCU 8904 East Marginal Way M -H Yes ALA PAC, Inc. M -2 Yes 9026 East Marginal Way Cut, store cable /rope M -H Yes Joyce's Final Approach M -2 Yes 9100 East Marginal Way Restaurant M -H Royal Machine Tools M -2 9110 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Langendorf M -2 Yes 9112 East Marginal Way Retail, day -old bread iGA ^' ..;,.. :M U.> f.'y`: 't: •:'N ::';Y..{ M< fl T.r n . _. _ � .,.;vry lai:" `FIi.• .i< J•.'?. ;Ye1 s:.a .q . ��.. 9. ` 411. .4. T ' �':L y� .'!• °s',.;� s. , y..r.; "iT', :r, rr. �t. ,; ?i�a 1.`,' ,!Pif':' :� +t! �: rp ., th .. tfS'!: P?°: JtSfG:;'. �' �w: YS .'6y:6...x*��.,c +?b,.,,:: ., �.,: a�` t.. �i. u:. S_ �. 1di,.: 5` d�ay.';: �L' �i. s. F. k!. 3t�. a�.» t.-. �<- a�.[,,.. ia. �"_` 5` �?: n. Li> �.., . �.. Crs.: v.+:. �s: ��,. �t' �r'.,+ I.. VLI. GN�S�Nn�i6: r`: f; lil,. vf7 �S' ��J.,. Y" i.,. a5... r... �,•,. vt� 4.... .,.'3". >t;� < ..?�F "^� .lra. C Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 3 EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H Miller Manufacturing M -2 9130 East Marginal Way M -H Rap -I -Form M -2 9130 East Marginal Way M -H Designer Services M -2 9134 East Marginal Way M -H Northwest Laboratories M -2 9200 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Firestone Tire Company M -2 Yes 9220 East Marginal Way Recap tires M -H Yes Rhone Poulence, Inc. M -2 Yes 9229 East Marginal Way Manufacture artificial vanilla M -H Gelco Transport Int'l Pools M -2 9249 East Marginal Way M -H UCU King County Air Park Hangers M -2 UCU 9250 East Marginal Way Public storage M -H UCU S & W Aircraft Leasing Co. M -2 UCU 9250 East Marginal Way M -H Boeing M -2 9303 East Marginal Way Building 7128 (new structure) M -H Yes Dallas and Mavis Forwarding M -2 Yes, Forwarding office for new w /TA tractor /trailer M -H Yes Boeing M -2 Yes 9363 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Museum of Flight M -2 Yes 9404 East Marginal Way M -H . Yes Boeing Military Development Cntr M -2 Yes 9725 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Boeing M -2 Yes 10000 East Marginal Way ry � -fiC •' t�. • .r�} ^.: r' � •:n'� c.4,: :'.'A: "T tl: ri 1r'V_1Y'�Ir: :�1.+.!!:.J /: �..�� i . }y.p:t.w. ::1.Y :R1ntN� rr ' : .: ' i t Y.t ;• Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 4 EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H Yes Randy's Restaurant M -2 Yes 10016 East Marginal Way M -H Kinnear Construction Company M -2 10056 East Marginal Way M -H Boeing M -2 10109 East Marginal Way M -H V.B. Truck and Trailer Repair M -2 10161 East Marginal Way M -H Yes A.G.E. Credit Union M -2 Yes 10200 East Marginal Way M -H CU Northwest Auto Wrecking M -2 Yes 10230 East Marginal Way Store /compress /retail parts M -H Yes Joe's Auto Service M -2 Yes 102301 East Marginal Way Engine repair M -H Yes B.J.'s Auto Painting & Repair M -2 Yes 10300 East Marginal Way M -H Trim Line Design M -2. 10300 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Golden Rule Brake Service M -2 Yes 10300 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Strick Lease, Inc. M -2 Yes 10301 East Marginal Way Lease and store trailers M -H Yes Fernando's Restaurant M -2 Yes 10315 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Annex Tavern M -2 Yes 10325 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Associated Groceries M -2 Yes 10430 East Marginal Way Offices M -H Yes Skagen Marine M -2 Yes 10125 East Marginal Way Showroom and storage Custom services and sales :' ` :..r•:v . ✓... �•: •:''t"� Z :Li �l i. r „ f o-.�., •K P., xi r k PY. •x'•lp't nA . , +�. %.�.K 4.. : ; x :: ✓. C . `rTr+ ...�. is a � t`i :, . : J tJ!..:' ?ca �.;.'�. r-ac t^.t u n .�'d : :w«r, :�v,x�•5 _ x . � , . t c a } � � s r..t, » x . ,..,. %'!: :� 4R •`ir •: t � t',7.a.- K, - . �:'."" i•'� ... :.7k 1 f?i;•n•,: �, ,y d,,... ; i' n�ia. �` w`..: ntC,+: k: x:. Ki?' i3r. f, t�+. �.• a< 4.. �ir. �tv�u— �F:',' i:.,...• s�::i l' iti�lst.; sac i;:?.;.,,.., x:. 5a.,.. �L4: sN..., a�... �,.. a: v- xl:': w» i:+., 1.' bl.•.'.,, �: �C6�^. r ( i. l.:' it::.. 1�.' �i:. Y�:. a..:.. S'.., ,.,. .. .i��}.0 ":�. :.5',c� �,a. . }�. :'�C. h .Zr��:�:'.6:.:5�..,.t,.s EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H Western Energy Distributors, Inc. M -2 10625 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Big B's Towing M -2 UCU 10625 East Marginal Way Towing, with yard M -H Yes Rainier National Bank M -2 Yes 10830 East Marginal Way Office with warehouse /yard for repossesions M -H M -H M -H M -H M -H M -H M -H Yes Yes Maron Machine Tool Rebuilding M -2 10831 East Marginal Way Wesco Distributors T.M. Leasing 10844 East Marginal Way Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 5 Eastern Electric M -2 Yes Rebuild large electric industrial motors M -2 M -2 Pacific Mat Company M -2 10846 East Marginal Way Signature Motors M -2 Yes 10849 East Marginal Way Antique car sales M -H Yes Wagoneer's Trucking M -2 Yes 10990 East Marginal Way Broker for truck merchandise M -H Yes Truck Trailer Sales M -2 Yes 11001 East Marginal Way Buy /sell used trucks /trailers M -H Yes Pony Express M -2 Yes, 11004 East Marginal Way w /TA Parcel service delivery M -H Seattle Police Athletic Assn. M -2 UCU Rental hall /pistol, rifle, skeet ranges /classrooms Conmaco M -2 11180 East Marginal Way tiT1'Y.: •:W: , 8::° aew . iti'�,4^ - ,.•(.,q t.k.'� ;e:.;.., ..• .. �„,..:A rr�• s;1�:r.:'rp, � "i ,n: .:t,v :.st Prat S'7.'. ; -„ ..,3,.. 7 -:.0 [.c ... 1 '4': "c`.�. C•,: cr�t' i< id..-. n... ul�x :�SX,'�o >.i'.`.•i._i.,'.¢'%.U ox.GS:... u>3:,a..�. «'.r....:iSlliii�,_ .,. ... " i; �,..:.. �., �' stUs;.. iFrv>.:., �. �S: L.... �. ii^' a;s�n ._.:_i�c. .....,.. 5• r..r., .,. e�; ,. B -C EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H C.E.C. Equipment Company M -2 11222 East Marginal Way M -H Standard Parts & Equipment M -2 11222 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Yellow Freight Systems M -2 Yes, 11231 East Marginal Way w /TA Warehouse /office /maintenance fuel M -H Sandpiper Container Truck M -2 11525 East Marginal Way M -H CEMCO Water Conditioning M -2 11535 East Marginal Way M -P METRO Transit 12100 East Marginal Way Maintenance center M -H -P Yes METRO Training Center M -2 11911 East Marginal Way M -H Yes Sam's Tire M -2 Yes 12115 East Marginal Way Tire sales & service installation M -H Yes Sid Eland, Inc. M -2 Yes 12125 East Marginal Way Multi -beer distributor M -H P Yes General Iron Works M -2 Yes 12265 East Marginal Way Steel welding M -H Yes Bailey Sales and Assoc., Inc. M -2 Yes 12308 East Marginal Way Wholesale /storage bathroom fixtures M -P Yes Rainier Bank Operations Center C -M Yes 12400 East Marginal Way Computers and check processing M -H Yes Sportscaster M -2 Yes 10427 Empire Way South Warehouse /leather goods Crown Industries C -2 12817 Empire Way South L .�LS".CSi'S'n� .w1' \Na•.;n :',C.)..... .J'Myl.«W!`::, ,-.-. Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 6 `t';Aii `f Y`• r:): .p.... f ^.r.ti . .. A •.V J'd �.y,af ^ ..M r^. .c: •-- .w. `i i + '� f . . r x- ;iCt .A1 -., Y . t ::., +'. i:rY� . (xai t .'k::v:..x {.: .. ^•' 7f:• � �'`•:i r,'..�,: ': ,p.T. •.za:. a,s: i�Cr'.._:.� �,:uc,.f #m 4��` rG, girl �. emt �: �:: �+ J? a�,,: trX; t�. i.,. i. �. ��: ca, �: s:: �4t:;': kw r.. �. t.: s' �r. r: xf>.,`.:;.: ��.., N-:!: f�.:. n'.? tr: F. y� ;.;t`�'. EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? B -C Yes Willey's Too C -2 Yes 12833 Empire Way South Tavern B -C Yes John's Exxon C -2 Yes 12911 Empire Way South B -C Yes Paik's Mart C -2 12923 Empire Way South Grocery store B -C Yes Hair Affair Styling Salon C -2 12925 Empire Way South RM -900 Vue Mobile Court RMH UCU 12929 Empire Way South M -H Yes Sunset Demo M -2 Yes 13001 Empire Way South Large industrial waste storage /maintenance M -H Yes Arco Mini Mart M -2 Yes 13201 Empire Way South RM -1800 Empire Estates RMH 13501 Empire Way South 240 units M -H Yes Sound Air, Inc. M -2 Yes 10435 M.L.King Jr. Way S. Manufacture air conditioning ducts M -H Yes R & R Used Auto Parts 133011 M.L.King Jr. Way S. Junk yard M -H Yes Guardsmen Chemical M -2 Yes 13535 Monster Road South Manufacture paint . , i yTVI.T:: .'r.� T'=4`"f: .;FItsn �f��Y'." rtT ,;. .i.. ... t_ i.. -- ....:.....: C4rv.. b. .�Gt1,l4�e:..���4.:..;.+w1?).af yLc4'�:.S, +d:-,.Sti'[��;.�. .. Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 7 M -2 M -H Yes Petroland Gas Service CU 10655 Pacific Highway South Store and sell liquid propane M -H Pro- Truck and Equipment M -2 10830 Pacific Highway South M -H Yes Big John's Truck Repair, Inc. M -2 Yes 10831 Pacific Highway South ^_.EYriJi i s \�.x.c C •1.; .r;.,. ?'' ?. M.` s't';: ..wrv�� , . {5:" .r• , vs s} c,.,. . .. ;rTi TU * .i l ∎ Tknr ' criftV.M .. ...... z..�.,rJ::f =: s... >.iR..0 .v. \. "x.:...? j ,..A.,�:..�_ "r;i�:.�.�r.a c,"v..i.r.. _ t5+: a,.v .. ..a ,<4 .fr'`'.°n M -H A.C.E. Electric M -2 11234 Pacific Highway South Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 8 EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H F & M Enterprises M -2 10835 Pacific Highway South M -H Yes Riverton Auto Repair M -2 Yes 10835 Pacific Highway South M -H Hatten Machinery M -2 10835 Pacific Highway South M -H Yes Sea -Tac Ford Truck Sales, Inc. M -2 Yes 11000 Pacific Highway South Dealership /service for trucks M -H Yes Six Robblees', Inc. M -2 Yes 11010 Pacific Highway South Truck auto parts store M -H Yes Puget Sound Tire Company, Inc. M -2 Yes 11011 Pacific Highway South Install /sell truck /auto tires M -H Yes Gratzer Lift Truck M -2 Yes 11017 Pacific Highway South Store, sells, repair lift trucks M -H Shultz Distributing, Inc. M -2 11061 Pacific Highway South M -H Yes Washington Truck and Trailer M -2 Yes Used truck trailer sales M -H Yes McDonald Miller Company M -2 Yes 11063 Pacific Highway South Manufacture air ducts M -H Yes Boulevard Excavating, Inc. M -2 Yes 11065 Pacific Highway South Store and service bulldozers, dump trucks M -H Yes Peerless, A Division of Siegler M -2 Yes 11210 Pacific Highway South Heavy truck conversions i.e., logging uses M -H Bayside Equipment, Inc. M -2 11233 Pacific Highway South ., �a f.;�� i�ti fnio•*. -: r'r�: � v:;a. .r. , X;� . , �w ,...i x."* si. � ��.�k4t�a,c73.;'F.Si..r .. T.. x� ..•rc.+?:..�:�c..,.��C..w.:�_.. 1....s�u,.3... s�.n. i'�.�.�.L:�� t�rssitiw' =;;t ` t'`y }�u;c.ZT:x'i.•. ? T:?3V.IA ..: 17.4.,' S,1 r n fIlt.4."wS, ":?� At i:`.�. '.'.?J.'Hit, a?���:1'. Fire District No. 1 Uses Page 9 EXISTING TUKWILA KING COUNTY PROPOSED ZONE PERMITTED? BUSINESS / ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION ZONE PERMITTED? M -H Yes Holiday Inn M -2 Yes 11244 Pacific Highway South M -H Yes Wash. State Trans /Aeronautics M -2 Yes Office M -L Yes Lindal Cedar Homes M -1 Yes 4300 South 104th Place Sales /display lot M -L Seattle Community Cablevision M -1 4316 South 104th Place Receiver /distributor of cable TV M -L Yes Harrington Plastics N.W. M -1 Yes Retail /plastic pipes warehouse M -L Yes J. C. Penney Company M -1 Yes 4322 South 104th Place Manufacture custom draperies M -L Yes Earl's Restaurant Supply M -1 Yes 4345 South 104th Place M -L Yes Lull, Inc. M -1 Yes 4357 South 104th Place Cabinet manufacturer M -H P Yes Boeing M -2 Yes South 120th Place Warehouse M -H Yes Inco Express, Inc. M -2 Yes, 360 South 124th Street w /TA Truck terminal with cold storage M -H Yes City Junk M -2 Yes 4915 South 124th Street Aluminum cans, copper RM -900 Yes Empire View Trailer Court RMH UCU 5711 South 129th Street RM -900 Yes Empire Pine Apartments RMH Yes 5726 South 129th Street 6 units (26 /FDl.USES1 -3) TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Annexation Task Force Members Moira Carr Bradshaw October 27, 1987 MEETING SYNOPSIS - OCTOBER 21, 1987 1'Yt c9I a City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1800 Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor MEMORANDUM Questions were raised about the effectiveness of the task force and how they would operate. Staff responded that the City Council would be responsive to their recommenda- tions. The group's work would be summarized in issue papers. A chairperson will be nominated to act as spokesperson and to conduct the meetings. It was also felt that the chairperson should be a resident of the community. Issues were then identified and grouped according to their relationships: a. Water / Sewer / Services b. Comprehensive Planning / Zoning c. Regulations / Codes / Permitting/ d. Transportation / Capital Improvement Planning e. Taxes / Fees / Political Representation Finally, the group expressed a desire to see a vision for the annexation area. Why would the municipality of Tukwila want this area as a part of its residen- tial and commercial community and how will the area be treated or exist within the existing framework of City life? Conversely, it might be beneficial at the close of the group's efforts to express what annexation would mean to the subject area. The staff discussed a current process that is occurring "Tukwila 2000 ", which is developing a vision for the City for the next fifteen years. Their conclusions will be shared with the annexation task force when it becomes available. It consists of business, residents and political representatives A rough flow chart was laid out to give a sense of timing which was considered a critical factor in the task force's effectiveness. Attached is a general time- line of events and suggested schedule for task force. MCB /sjn ' Xdl 'C. S0SNMV4:J o 4 iM2y4�. .it z.ve e.tasta Ne i'A�l i ati'4.`Y:�r�1.st:7 !MI`0fAIMNI:40.+�` sratto�1�`Y.4?,e` .Yi 7mine wrAmistsvSm' k ri'Ftravamove rmen -+mj +.: MEMORANDUM to: Annexation Task Force Members October 27, 1987 Page 2 The meeting concluded with the scheduling of the next two meetings - Monday, November 2, and Tuesday, November 10, 1987, at 5:00 p.m., in the Police Training Room, Tukwila City Hall. The first issue to be addressed by the group will be Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning. oira arr :ra'shaw SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL I MAY EIS Scoping ANNEXATION Annexation Information Meeting TASK FORCE ANNEXATION CC (20 /MB.10 -27MA) JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER MAY (continued) Resolution DEIS - Draft Environmental Impact Statement FEIS - Final Environmental Impact Statement PH - Public Hearing FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TIME FRAME Land Use Information Meeting DEIS PH, End Comment Period Land Use - - -- Services - -- T /Taxes - -- Codes /DEIS - -- -CAP BRB BRB BRB King Cnty - -- Election - -- -City Council Sets Passes Election Ordinance FEIS Pre - Annexation Comp Plan Zoning CCPH #1 CCPH #2 CAP - City Council Committee on Community Affairs and Parks CC - Tukwila City Council BRB - King County Boundary Review Board C >:3 PHONE (206) 762-1100 TELEX 32-0080 FAX (206) 763-0848 Ms Moira Bradshaw Associate Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98160 Dear Moira: EARLE M. JORGENSEN CO. STEEL FORGE DIVISION SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98124 October 13, 1967 8531 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH MAILING ADDRESS: BOX 24026 Woody Wilkinson has kept me apprised of your progress toward establishing the Tukwila Fire District 111 Task Force. I look forward to the first meeting, and hope that we can get off to a flying start. Those of us who work for Jorgensen Steel, Rhone Poulenc and Booing are currently working together to review annexation issues. We have met and endorsed the notion of a task force, and we would. like to keep you advised of our feelings on the annexation issues. I The deveopment of long-range plans for the entire proposed GOT i9 1987 CITY PLANNING rPT. As the task force gets underway, we would like to present our views on two issues: The composition and schedu3ing of the task force and the agenda of issues the task force might address. ..ith_igu?pct_t;p_thef We understand that you plan to set up two separate task forces, one for residents and. another for business. While we understand your rationale for creating two separate task. forces, we request that you reconsider and. establish a single task force. We view the area as a community, and we are worried about establishing artificial differences in the stakes we each hold in this community. We expect the process to provide all of us with a better understanding of the needs of all affected parties. As such, a single task force with perhaps subcommittees, would better promote a final consensus. Wittl,respeothe second We are interested in the full range of planning considerations, and we want to help set the future development agenda for this area. We know that the area is valuable; we have made many investments which have added to that value. We would like to have a hand in determining the future development decjsions, and we are also concerned that our current ability to operate remains unimpaired. To that ':1 we feel that t:hc following are topics which should be addrsed: e fr, EARLE M.JORGENSEN C 2Y The role of the task force in relationship to the planning commission, and how task force results are to be handled. 3) The development of zoning which will meet current and future development needs of the area. 4) Permitting processes. 5) Regulations and codes. 6) Capital improvement needs and plans for the area (including transportation issues) . 7) Some expression of long-range plans and policies for taxes and fees. We recognize that we may be undertaking an ambitious agenda. We are committed to a thorough examination of the planning and development issues, and we would hope for. the City's commitment to that end. We are enthusiastic about: the possibilities which this approach presents. We look forward to an active fall, and await the initiation of our meeting schedule. RAltier:sjd. Marilyn Stoknes City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington Sincerely, Charlie Simpson City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 Ed Bauch City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 c c:: Rick Beeler, Planning Director City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 Don Morrison, City Ad.minist.rator. City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 Manager Industrial Relations Mayor Cary Van Dusen City of Tukwi. la Tukwila, Washington 98188 Joe Duffle City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 Wendy Morgan City of Tukwila 98188 Tukwila, Washington 98168 Mabel Harris City of Tukwila Tukwila, Washington 98188 .: w .. ,u,. .. Ktme� •.tr,;.• � -r- •.r.r>. ,r,Y.,. .,,r. � "` y';iS:'S°�Y:ikt�:'4:in .x:. }7� :e �'�' . . City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-1849 MEETING: Wednesday, October 21, 1987 5:15 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1987 TO: TASK FORCE - FIRE DISTRICT #1 ANNEXATION FROM: MOIRA CARR BRADSHAW, PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: MEETING - FIRE DISTRICT #1 Thank you for volunteering your time and energy to a task force on the annexation petition of Fire District #1. Enclosed is an orientation sheet for discussion purposes. It is to start the process and can be changed or redirected based on the issues the group feels are important and need to be addressed. The purpose of the first meeting is to organize, orient and familiarize the group and staff with objectives of the task force and the area's existing conditions. Chairmen for the citizen and businessmen subgroups will be chosen; and finally, future agendas will be discussed. PLACE: Police Training Room Lower Floor, City Hall (southside) 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington If you cannot attend this first meeting but would like continued involvement, please call me at 433 - 1848. _ .. -'��;•' r . - , LL; �Sh�> �., �' �' �u ,7i'.,t. » „r;k ^�r : lh: 1.1'.. .t'. '. ?.r i.11't ii:: :• +. i.r:�.rz; ♦:.:�('. �' .�1 � .�. _:.•W:t�r.a r ;. 4�: { r;�” ;G2 ?" �` %.� :.� {r ".L'�t` " it.'J.. 13'. ",7:,•�:� { °A Iti...� {t , s., :_r:).4;iit •..• s';S'; ,.•o'JtT "_''.,. n., !:r 1Lh.' ':''1;:� %:�'.4<:.:,. Dui:'; a. t; i ? 1;. .....,( qua iJ- 3..o4�etf ,_..,. ,'iF't:i gym.`- s:;.t.'•: si.�. `i:. . .. i MEMBERSHIP: BUSINESSMEN AND CITIZENS TASK FORCE-ON ANNEXATION Two ad hoc committees to study and advise on annexation issues to City Hall. PURPOSE: Identify and provide input on annexation issues. OBJECTIVES: Review and recommend planning alternatives on 1. Land Use A. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map B. Zoning Regulations 2. Services and Infrastructure TASKS: 1. First Meeting: A. Introduction and Orientation B. Existing land uses, plan designation and districts. C. Comparable Tukwila designations and districts. 2. Second Meeting: A. Inconsistencies between comparable zones. B. Alternatives. 3. Third Meeting: A. Non - conforming uses B. Recommendations 4. Fourth Meeting: A. Services and infrastructure id. of issues and concerns B. Recommendations Those who expressed an interest in public scoping meetings and one Planning Commission member. Each group shall hold individual meetings and elect a chairman, then reconvene as one group to discuss recommendations. The Planning Department shall provide staff and support for committees to complete tasks. —er2 — 66 _ Y V re �i:;: witYa. k�'. �n:% �a: iS�" .'+�1'�L'�:41'J.TivTxav�vrnmw.— ice' A (e,.-6,---- 2 Wf w / c74/L �� G-6,,,-41W 7'-ez,i, / ovv\- a Pry 7Uti 6u) a-Lp q4 • 1.4 !i1A . _..i 4 I- - - S . /Y1/1-1 !ln w P 1987 1 cL 4 crns / /4 .14,,,-.4 r — -- crna.... . etif a.A._kazf) ----e44rgii- r , . . , - / • 4 , c ■ �- . 7 2 iJ 1 .--eyyYt-e -- 4 dt- Lac ---t4-ceL.4.11(-0-/ 4Ltti7 'I/ ee,$ a7 914-0 t&L.P,=1, 3 kJ-v-0 az a Aki c9-44/ (4 -D o-v‘.-- I t < -- -- 4_,e/ 2 92 -- - , th..) •.4 ct, - '1 1 -e,t_5 1 - L. . - /7 ` a-44 W7 /2 lii Lt.Lee,i4/ . k- 4. y (") i-eAt , — 4 7 2:1 ; �i {�.:IGi�;a:';��C :h11� `YS7 ��:;5^.\v.1 "+zre x, i�r»n,. « 5i' a.T3n:�,.d:nn�xwarr.•�.- ,._...� ��•cr�S "� �.S+Lu�1•u��.�wwt:� ',J:<a�?aL�.�:�`a � '7 -- "lei' ` 2L" ��,/ ere�� �. tea- / � , Cvn PFk , '91/11V t Z .`- - L . 37 C1.40 46 g a 9; >yzv CJ &)-‘914a—L 4. r, r,- n isi;.". V,• r ;c;a,:;C,ti4t`.,s:1':e ^�a.47`�,g rf "v.Z ;r .. �Ca�rr�at: cka;+ JM S 1. v9" �: c+' C% �..•• 4' i+" L`t n; �: �, Fa �. . i:. u:: �42� :i:'a.aT:^� •:`C(..L ".:3 ?F . c�ay. IS; �r�v 'i� <•: "fit'ii�.tl:i�'»"!:••••• �' " ` / `��'LCf.I' p� C QA41"'. ,j., -.,a- --9. 4i y a•-f� r .. 4.. .._ _ , --- - 7‘. , ---4.,e ----7---2,/- 6-4..././2-_ m_ --/- / ,,,.,..)._ , , , , ,i,;, ,,,,- , ':, _, _—.----9 )'':-%-., mil `�J ✓ � 3 r 1. �J i n - y_�.._._ • 1:- a:0 ;:t/ C' 21.14/ t / • . ci ,/,4-/-- _ ...a--C.2---1-L/ - --'f----1-1-1--) *• -- 1 / _Thi__`..')' --. • .• - st .m ,../1..1-./ -.". 2 --72 .-Zem...<2) - -• 77.'''Lem.. ..'14" . 1- 0" 7 -''' ' 'e--- 4 n-j- - ` 3 14- - • 14 /11AJ . 1744& 72 - . - //) CP1Z.V 1 ....... v/" A L. _ c=1-" ■-;) • 4 / • 4 \ , . Z a_4.1 aJ- c-11 • . • •; • \ • 0 23"--2-44411-9- .• TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWIL the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last yeneral election for the area in consideration for . herein, lying contiguous to the City of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 91221._ registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine'whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Repised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." 11E, This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. 1. Name: (Print) ....41/ I //Pa is Si gn atu re s % —i(. 2. Name: (PrintL,Be.lt )( L, f AIA4d: e 1 -a1- J" Signature: 3. Name: (Print) Signature: ;jl... Pr G t.4 , 4. Name: (Print) ....sAt.Ly Btic ..8E¢. - 7-- atl0-86 Signature: 5 . Name: (Print ).0p,p/ S oc9ety t3 // h' signaturel J Q���iritt,Gl7` 6. Name: (Print Signatur U, [7 R. (I A 1. t 7T c'// Name: (Print) Igo R N+ 4 - L. nIa-� /-/ 7 6 , ! A-."o - 9 wc%-i-- 7i/ 7 r REGISTERED VOTER . Warning 1% person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who kno.vingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. PET1TIuf, FA NhN;X ^.T.otf TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) (Names of the' petitioners, should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) t. d4 / (i 'DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER 7 7 . 12/i' • !r f Ai; i 4 7/4 7 5 e. #1-C . lad y'J/ r //16 2 ' (.-t 3.'' f .,!C 1- !tf •L 4 f L 3 - fN3 • REGISTERED VOTER PETITIuN FAR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for =election•herein, lying contiguous to the City. of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 93q_ registered voters, do hereby call foI an election to be held to determine'whether such area should be annexed to the City of .Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should -be* in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) 1. Name: (Print) Vio %f accha -r►ari Signature 2. Name: (Print) Z4 V I._aYSan f..jb -8G /zs �- r/ f' /�rp s_ ' Signature: v >? -07:- 3 . Name: (Print) ' /,v,Aty &vtrTH 9 / -FCC ) 2 2Z -id 's/ .5 Signature: 4 Name: (Print)4)ice. 04V1c1604 c i -1`1- 8 t� f � Signature: ,:,J Name: (Print) Ldrrt ld, A / /oAriu to signature: Eda`e- rrr• 6 . Name: (Print) L- 1 L 1-tfly rA PET/1 1 - 16 'Ad Signature: 7. Name: (Print) &v:4) Qaz /4RSa /1a / • - 5 - '4; P.CI s c Signature:4g 8. Name: (Print) C-1I 'tee AL • g12.41$4 /I6 /ir " "4 4 :i 17 G Se Si gnature: A -'t- - /` • 'DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER /4 S4 (0-5o 'So Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an • election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. • he, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for - election herein, lying contiguous to the City. of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be g3 a registered voters, do hereby call fol. an election to be held to determine' whether such area should be annexed to the City of ,Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the R wised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to.the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. 1. Name: (Print) 1 Yo /YI)y--C/1 ;M 9' ^/ .4 /2 z2 6 Sc � Signature: / -'., 14 2-Q 2. Name: (Print) N' et\1(Q}N J p \‘"q'C, 13 cncl - OK Signature: C a C •, N. a., 1 Signature: PETITIuN FLR HhhEXATtON TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 3. ' Name: (Print Signature: 4. Name: (Print) LDR0- fl,LLC,Q Jc») L. Sind'-bi 5. Name: (Print) ignature: 6. Name: (Pri t , � \O -1- Signature: t ..�' 7. Name: (Print) /1/4-Q \ L. Gv`1: Ile Sign ature� 0 '70 - ,nF 6-- -' 8. Name: (Print) ..6Nrt, ;, - joJz/ C Signature: 1 ,,Q0„A4 6a. e _. Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- Qeamor. PETITIuh F R MNIEX,TION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Eleotion Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general election for the area in consideration for herein, lying contiguous to the City of .Tukwila, Washingtch of which there is estimated to be 914_ registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held.to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of .Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the nbrvised Code of Washington. 1ne territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in' "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. 2. Name: (Print) Signature: 3. Name: (Pr'nt) Signature: 73e1450 4. Name: (Print )- A ^,cki.' 0/7D4114) Signature: �� f rA41‘ 5. Name: (Print) A nne, utmei- ned !I /GISG ignature: &ko90 6. Name: (Print) ._ earrvi, e.: 44-4 /i - cr - Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Kt-1 Y Signature: Name: (Print); � r Signature: /r,,l,L, L' I ' r c) , (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration,.) REGISTERED VOTER • DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER 1. Name: (Print) CIe!'4 / zaiv e // 39 . Signature: Aldebt1/2_ ///6,- /4/fi4/1_f-4.Lge 'a & — `/v '/Qv. _g . 77»L /JAY y77((' spy 4 WA eiglic 4 5 r%- s l/ "j 5 > • 11'7.t ` /. y Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for election h erein, lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 93L{ registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of .Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.O2O of the Rrovised Code of Washington. Tne territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto 'to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. b. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print) / /�� r y ,` /i- 7r Signature: l roc h""1/ 2. Name: (Print) 5 Illt_ Mkt A..44 Signature: Nn kc.t10, 3. Name: (Print) Sue t •Jess Signature: 4. Name: (Print) (Tc,, C Signatu�. - D. Name: (Print) ogFlf 1-t1Sni signature: a Name: (Print ).A LFs L . r`i /) 4- Y` Signature: 7. Name: ) Signature: Signature: !'r. 7 4 j� s b. Name: (Print) AttN 1 -lopI' leer f " =TITIO Fa ANNEXi+TION � _. TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) 'DATE OF SIGNING t2.-q_Sto ADDRESS OF SIGNER I I 'l ti Svc. uJ�� r 'ill- (_ • ift 1 ii'S MA" A,u . S Sew. +tle.� wrk_ Q LY 1 fog Warning very person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who nowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an lection when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not ualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- eamor. r . , - rcTi7Iut F:,n ANNEX.,TiuN TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: he, the undersigned, r•epresenting•ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for election herein, lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 531 registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Rvised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." phis group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- ;ic.n seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, end May be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. S. Signature: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permaJent, registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print) Quill AaL /.✓E ST r,,f' t 4 /^ i6 /// .37 4//5S o Signature: 2. Name: (Print) REA -R1_ PERL/• /. Signature: .,1-.,e tAi2, AA -L.1 3. Name: (Print)H,L -TON M. PERLIN• Signature: / � � � � %,�, / / /'� 11/33 -S/ sr_ Av. so. t � - n 4 . Name: (Print) !l o/ RT. A • SToe.e /4 — — & (, /11 ss AUL. �O Signature: G(. 4 '.e�.tp SFAnt..E tiA . � lk l 19 5. Name: (Print)LOue. S . / ?e/, S'— i;` — '4-5 / / /11 — � " /s aw.Se * /7 C 1.4 k. 6. Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) L. Ov1S J Cr/ S0JA( • DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER LI/ /4116, ///a3 S7d-• )411t•S, 7 y- c /// 3 3 - 57 s "31' ignature: v &o ,,:Qs ' zdx ,_tea 94/ Ye' Name: (PrintYe 4 f' Cl 1k R,. tstsof G b llG��:� ►.l�Q•,.,� X39 Signature: te.Q cQ a PI/1 g �t/ Iasi . 21./:e 9k 7 r Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an • election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not . qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. • we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for =election herein, lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 21.' 3 registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of .Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the R wised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. S. • Name: (Print) DDIP/7 411'2FitL- Signature: 4J�,� ; ,, „ Name: (Print) th'1%'e hm4"/ Signature: J. Name: Signature 4. Name: REGISTERED VOTER ANN xi,T iii PETIThiN FOR ,. TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) ice L (Print ) 4 <'��1/0,4se ( , /frri (P ri nt ) �Li/ ) �•'... Signature: Name: (Print)L113//4 f S 11 signature 6. name: (Print) Of1aI g/SsILI GIG J /fd Si gnature:6& I. Name: (Print) 5,_'.:.9ri.e:fw Al. 2:a=E Signature: 4S A.- 1q.L o 0 6. Name: (Print) TAPIR Signature: j, /z, �� DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER Au /4 //133- 4ve .Se. Alt 4 / f a ///33 - S //aAlti.v /// /11 33. J/ s-'-S6 *- 1113 3 •s /.01` ,So. - 7 / y . /f 8'G 1/1 33 47st"Avt f6 . ¢ So Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when'he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- 4eamor. TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general election for the area in consideration for herein, lying contiguous to the City. of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 9314_ registered voters, do hereby call fo'r an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the kwvised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. • 1. Name: (Print) MI1.DA A w6HL1,arsgJa /d /98 _5'dt+i .5.. /12 /N sr, 2. Name: (Print) iunature: Name: (Print) ignature: Signature: Signature: /. Name: (Print) Signature: Signature: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER , PET1TIur, FAR M NEX;,T,uN TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) Name: (Prints 'Iw tVc Ve.a.vahe ' DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER 9- 3,0- �`� g i //3 — t_r etz2S ,S7 /I ,Ye /29 � �7 50, 't4 )/ 4,%l 7 0 7216 4 ate. ,J re .iynature: Name: (Print) /_ 6A/4 M S 1/ p (-74- G &s h ?1/7 i gnature: r`' U ,.1,P -. 271 o. 2�4-• r.. Name: (Pri C i, riiS J.S1n/exiIi q ,�o - �1 /aa-ti 144 11Pc.4 7!/ .44/;_,4e l� yam - y3- a EvW /7f Name: (Print) f /t/L 1J /C1 et.S"N.j /f I r� 12 2 / 9 -'/ F q a,,, Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not . qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. 4E, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for•electionc herein, lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 51214_ registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.O2O of the (.wised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. I. Name: (Print) Name: REGISTERED VOTER PETI T Iuh FoR KAc.Ar,TlA TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) DATE OF SIGNING Signature: 9, , ; A-4 i g n at u r e: `76?) u. Name: (Print) Signature: ?. Name: (Print) Signature: ;,. Name: (Print) Signature: ADDRESS OF SIGNER s v 429 � 9 'x)2 z'O / s 6 9..c/ k qe"7-- 5/,7 . 9.1/G 5- Oec./,i /9// 541/ - / /7'i4' 9 /.'E Name: Prin ,lT,r),. C S /tFf 'L ' i gnature: a_-,, c A(„ ( (Print) W t n 1 C j'i 4!mt-esan.. ,Dee- //- ff i gnature: / GGr-, — Name: (Print) Mint ..T.ljnlnF7�?.SCA) X21 /-f 4 / / 7 17 'P t ace, WJ do7.b //7 9�7-7P Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an • election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he is otherwise not . qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. • • we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for - election•herein, lying contiguous to the City. of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 334 registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine'whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property 4e„Scribed below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other gr.oups'of pages`containing additional signatures. • The undersigned has read, the above' or attached text and prayer' of the petition and consents to . the filing of other ggroups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working d4y upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney.- REGISTERED VOTER 'DATE OF SIGNING 1. Name: (Print) ilbqickF/91cet- 2. Signature: Name: (Print) Signature: P 3. Name: (Print) Signature: 4. Name: (Print) Signature: 5. 6. Name: (Print) ignature: Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: 6. Name: (Print) Signature: PETITIun F■R ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) 7 - 7 - (PC ADDREp OF SIGNER !45 s' 6/0°59u e 5 < e4 /,.)4 i5?'/ ZS & d te-f eo?ia A4144•FT/ r Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when'he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. We, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast as general 'election for the area in consideration for herein, lying contiguous to the City. of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 911_ registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine' whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the R 4vised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within. King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. 1 he undersigned has read the above or attached.• and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which" this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be :in identical form as the same appear'on - the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER ' DATE OF SIGNING^ ADDRESS OF SIGNER 1. Name: (Print) f/DYPr i. 77:7eN7p.Ser*-% J9 4,47 / /4O D — ./ */49 L �d I I b.y 2. 5/)/1" -1 / 2 S' . Name: (Print) ('ia, . )o tit � • r r - - 2r6 Signature: ( Name: (Print) , o Da!TIA -- `e ir' S ignature: /1,� �;, , 4„,-4.,/‘,2 / 4. Name: (Print) C-c Cnlyvi 1 Ctch 'Y - B Signature:C I ta , :&. ) 5. Name: (Print)a!// d r•...Ca sn•- e-41--s=" • ignature: „ 6. Name: (Print) MEleLi ,J 5(.0AQSOid Signature: /L1-2,61 7. Name: (Print) Pere, f 610 Z Signature• -e2G4 (764z/ 1 8. Name: (Print) R arta k VA. O'(o1 -h■ex-- 8-el --6' Signature: -& ()1/s. b 5,i=f Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when'he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. • Signature: PETITIuh FA ANNEXhTION TO THE CITY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: • Q /l 5 /2 21 4 1/4'Yli.A4¢ .5• Iaa4" 1 17/91A .c(7, S e , Tie wig . 98/78 4/6,6 424 44/6, S' /J V` 1;2 yf +' 77V. 4/r Sv Sevt » /c L•V • 73/ 2'2_ -- 4 -1 e . -S (a - Me, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for - election - herein, lying contiguous to the City of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be '93L1 registered voters, do hereby call fo'r an election to be held to determine 'whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. Signature: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print) Le3LE L S'-y- n, r►TjTIuh FLR ,NNEX,,TION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: 'DATE OF SIGNING 2. Name: (Print)....S'YWA Wit);:! C -4' V 6 Signature: a, 4G% h � 3. Name: Name• Print `,or WW /v.b9/e% W Signature: 4. Name: (Print ),4 4.../ C e /VORA!. Signature: aj 5. Name: (Print) 1 0 (M.)1 4diq. -e signature b. Name: (Print) Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: b. Name: (Print)Q,F,.,,i ,! .,,�.11i //4/ Signature (7 . • g - g 5--4 „ 1.6e-14. 2)e 46)et. gtch ADDRESS OF SIGNER /Z ZVO C ' I a 9 /2218 1 /7 So , y 4. If-714 50 SE(. WA 1714 3r 5 E4 W6 .te44ci / Li. u l 7 J /o? 3_3 .. &14Y .se) L9 772E 14 7,77 Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when'he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. �{ ^ "TITIun FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) TO THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pag$ forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation .pf the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other gingups of pages containing additional signatures. ..' The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as,a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. we, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 93' registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Revised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." C (Names of the petitioners should be in . form as the same appear on the voter's permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 'DATE OF SIGNING. ADDRESS OF SIGNER 1. Name: (Print) EA eoi-- fAIA zier-c'Clo - Signature" (44 , 2. Name: (Print) KtiMi 1:1 J 5) ac 1-?3,1.1 Li 2 Signature: 10\W, S s. Name: (Print) ;1I1/ e �r s— 6 /r,2�2/L �/ , Signature:" 4. Name: (Print) R00 Signature: 11VD 5. Name: (Print) signature: 6. Name: (Print) Signature: • COLA-Vat - 7. Name: (Print) a,...0.--c- I, y t-i aPs.J } 4 9=z.-8C Signature: 1 o-t.4( . w 8. Name: (Print) / v' ..Y P Da v'. «' 7 Signature: 4 , ' 1 - ,'�i...• , t t( - t 4 o t ,z,itic, ki Y/ t 44. s / zo3 yiso 5.e •t t/r 1%13. 9g/ ze4 4 Li 4 h .. O � 5 D /'Y/ • 5 eat - l- 3 ) Ltic+ • wS/ :QE Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when'he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. We, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for - election herein, lying contiguous to the City of.Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 934 registered voters, do hereby call fo'r an election to be held to determine'whether such area should be annexed to the City of, :Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020: of the Rovised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be nnexed is within King County, Washington., and is described as follows: SEE, "'attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." 1. Name: (Print) MAI? k °AyrS Signature:, t1 t. . ..2 Jeovdvt ignature: 6. Name: (Print) gigy Signature: 7. Name: (Print) kil /54 .)/CV4/Z Signature: 5. Name: (Print) KµL. co Signature: Name: (Print) Signature: • TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: REGISTERED VOTER PrT1TIuh F jR ANNEXi,T1i1N L.. TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON (Election Method) This group of pages is one of a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexation of the property described below to the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages cRtitaining additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or Attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to .the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this, petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. (Names of the petitioners should be in identical form as the same "appear on the voter's permanent registration.) . s, � z z. 77Z ( 10/ 7r 2. Name: (Pri nt) Ru i 4 Signature , ''. c 3. Name: (Print) ve-` -e/9 Si J Si gnature : - - e 4. Name: (Print) 42, ' DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER a c T Z /716 (d' Z �5�0 t0 - 012 /66, / VP- fl 1;va Uzos i -- Ave_ co Sth t' l ._ ` L2Saaj 4 PVC- f■1111, r_ `2 1173 Ross 44 Ayr. C I sips / ec : - s ,,,A„ to lVqgne 11044-44 fiv'e S ,ice' g Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an • election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. ►qe, the undersigned, representing ten percent of the votes, or more, cast in the last general 'election for the area in consideration for • herein, lying contiguous to the City. of .Tukwila, Washington of which there is estimated to be 934 registered voters, do hereby call for an election to be held to determine' whether such area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila pursuant to Section 35A.14.020 of the Ravised Code of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within King County, Washington, and is described as follows: SEE, attached legal description in "Exhibit A" and map in "Exhibit B." This group of pages is once a number of identical groups of pages forming one peti- tion seeking the annexWon of the property described below tq_the City of Tukwila, and may be filed with other groups of pages containing additional signatures. The undersigned has read the above or attached text and prayer of the petition and consents to the filing of other groups of pages hereto to be considered as a part of this petition up through the working day upon which this petition is filed with the King County Prosecuting Attorney. Signature:: 3. 'Name: (Pri Signature: Signature: 7. Name: (Print) Signature: TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA: (Names of the petitioners should be in identical. form as the same appear on the voter..'s permanent registration.) REGISTERED VOTER 1. Name: (Print) Ro.0 410 L• Ap/iiR Si R •L. r .a,.._ 2. Name: (Print) ft., 12. at' " "TITIuh.FOR ANNEXATiON TO THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON .(Election Method) Lit Ac ( ,41N) 4. Name: (Print)Vin /1 C pb • Signature:`f; . C " 5. Name: (Print) G'`•�., / 4e s ignature: 6. Name: (Print) ,/3e p /NflA L /4fj //1 6. Name: (Prifit'7� pp R Q S ignature 1 Warning Every person who signs this petition with any other than his true name, or who kno.ringly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs.a petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a mis- deamor. 91 • / / - *DATE OF SIGNING ADDRESS OF SIGNER ,re y772 ms s/ 3� ff //-c?—?6' /2 `ilk. ,4'8 Z WA EFF0 4-U S /78' ■: -/. fri Al • /' / .7 L. A -•■ 6 ce 1 .) () ) , • _ / / . Fr;'' ( 'C(5 - L... /k */ • ./.":" • 2/j,f-z-ett_z •■ • A., ■ iti r #( r GT t-.1 PA-'J (2 -•••• At? G±N / ( r / r • / 4 D Dees_3 F1 L. t. • 7 , 3 f2 21 . \ v.); . o 4 ( -o 2 4(0 k - L l ....}6 k - , - ,s __Cf, jj-r- L* ,sc.75.L.,..,L,t--1?)_t<L0.9(2.,,A).A,,_ -t A--.? to , 236x ,:172/6:Rg , , s_s'i,6&e i 9.EIR7 7//ez ?c -- 7 oo I 2 s -(--) it'v • :-•- • „ -.:-, c ) 0 5i'a /: t - • 7? C I . -2 -2 • / . — )47 ./ , (-•■ 1 I -(./p - • L • C ) /- • . • /7' U q 1 ,2 .;e4 • v12 • ,/ 5-, rE I 2 / 2, d c 5 . 4 -,L // S5'S — -7/ a vas c.) 0 Ave 5 • 7 /a /V e p -- . 1 4 4 /5 / // i 7. YAW 4 4 POCc rt,./5rsa Mito a 4 e .e / 2- f A-0 S c 7.;' -7 .7 7 YZ r2 4,2 - ri 76S 8 3L • ,/ - „ • ., • `7/ • . . 74 3 - z Sq.S' 2 o• • / 2 02 '14 7 (/ .> )Qe.7 /Y151 E._ :1. s'ai I) A450 A) .5To AKr.1? 6.4 /Z, PI 4 7 i4 IZJE71 N / 4 s („./. , L lf. • !.. d4a...."...) V -.‘ . . --) . ...., - Ai% '7'...-?.. / , -, tr't 1. • 1 (.1 1.L. ._ • rfi • 7- • • ' . , • • . • 7 ‘ - tiR- /./ .S Fe9- / 2 S 5 7 4 ?- 5 g - oj -2— Li /6 / / 2 :3 - -1 7/(ti 7S 6/4;4) e 9 7.F 7".;• / - 3 g ; I \ • 1 . • - , // / i //,/) , 4)2.3 ) . •,..• • ..) , / , . • / „ • • , I.- // -- . //• .7 i • • ;i. �� • iZfV . • 1_ . 153 Ewi4 • rift. 6 1 0:O A KING CO. FIRE PROTECTI DIST. [3EG /MN IN AT TIC /P of ,rile cetvT t 1 Ciro Mile 444.14, WA1 5.;01.4.m. AM) • M6 1�1E piezto rzcir1 pF the CfottgA L.0wlt Co 3ui1' Rusi SI)$XT; 714EMCZ S 4 M E Abir QF E At- &grit niTH To /1 Pu,n,r ws1CM Lies « " � .t,.t.4 /eb' 1�t 5'1 wOr:.T' .�,COM N u, A J..t.. As rrc 15E61N/J /NU *r A Tcurr 4)/4 THE btlpl' MA1tAsN of EASr MA11Ci//4/ 14,) Ai SoaTH SAID Ft,A/'r ae7.44 / tent 23 VE.S.r 4 Dist- / e of .35/. Zvi POET' ,1L,C+ l# 3*iD M4At4„V Frto*4 ME l /TL.&— 5f1••R44 OF T'W Sa 4TH L/A!i OF I / ij' / 3//►,J /T3sa.cr 2acwATTON L-tf ...4_ � 5 win+ 7I4C e,tur *Oka /N of CAST 1Ht1R4udi . I,UAY S+ui1■ , its MAMNED oN rWE wetrr iauA+DA41 of $oCu.,4 FIELD, 5AtB V'/par aSErn14 po•AAr oP IN7Z/iSGCI /ory QF 4 tb c i+'.alis Jas..y n.ls1 ,/N 64)1/14 the Brim t.,tiE ac h: IAAm •tISN R.WG. O. A!.• 4.STAAiL14HED E # C00.4•440.4,144.. wwtRc 04...4 Ai - To 1lrTAtItT I■ ° 114EACC C1wnwull"4 A do 014 Z &' Wu:UT taA C.A:•r /41 t112....44, A- PISTAP4CF OF 1 . 7 5 FELT To rc. O(0.4T • A" Aw+D �..0 OF • sD - + c�is?M r1O ; - 1 r1Ej•ICE /4L tic 1►\ (a: /b :5l . r0 X•4.4r ' A " TNFNCE crrtnaWNL. Note;Tt1 008 • L.tk+T AT Rocs tiT Amc Tb T1. E tt,`T[ 144A Mils4a.1 OF Env' MAR'r ifon. War SOLI 1,1 A DISTANCE OF 149 F•tt "r ALop1(1 THfs NottTF TERL`f LINE OF P'Ag.i.ai. 50F A, TRAcr or "1 NrD CoN tie YCD To F,t1 iy 1NC. 1s vtw ! �-�•• r+ 4wtoew. /Lim. cis F.s.e 14? SaCtioW 1 r c€ "ma L TM 2 S 41' 0 3" . Pt1A/11.4..CL 'TV O A t o GASTC01.1.4 11.4A64iO4 A P it∎TA . t OF 254 FEET; THENCE 'Souiw (,,(d ' %E 0 51 WtSr A • e..Tn/ E OF VW FELT To AN INTEAt:- t,e & r ilm T toi le.A•j.'/ MA,zc//N oP Ewsr MAC As,.0 c. '' W `1. ?4TM `1&D I CTtGr1 156044 a F>r', Jr 2-91 fcrr SoLTHEA C' F f•c.t rlr "A', TEiEt4X tr rrrt N.A A.44 start+ 4G°16 wesr To me C L� 1 ,10 Cf Ai n.R � t* of EAST MR t�E. rr4N- UI A Y Sai. n ; Tr1ENCE Sou ME ASTee i ON <sA1D CFME RL 1NE '(D Tht 4.:Eurrei_1NE OF MTh BARTOr1 STRCCT ENTEN D t D WESTEIb-Y c v100 rCE E*sTE.tl.i At.'NG Soto: rEN RO'4 4ND CENtec.,.JE bp kur1� nerbM STREET To THE we MAt'.:7r4 OF /Ic T,fF RAI IFIL RAN.- Jsui'1 1414 r-op- 4441; THENCE Sou TAC r�r AL.ON Q G' SA, L4.4251 MARL n/ .E NOIttHERIJ f�CICd. ,Ibl14wAy R614r -or -wit} 4".3$ 4C WEStEet•r CITY La/41M OF C111 OF 5EArTLE, TO r1IE cEt.+re I,c Su.414 • n .c _ (6)i-6 104 Srgi.LT; TtACE EAST At.N4 Sarn4 104r14 $rIZEEr To ` TC is 1C4NS E/161E e.%1..NDI11tr of IFrrtArkv ST/1Ti R sclNwAY 412. C6N /10.E 14A1 SJ TO; THENCE 51:1.•Ti1 M..onrG Salo ertaTRLi eoc.worip.r 6Z0 per, No At OK LESS, 10 THE Neaf`T1'tEi-e-1 NAPz 1.J of � xuify 1O'7n S ezirr, .THENCE rN 4 OvuThEAbrEIYLi D i 4T AL.01.4 SAID "Jot THE.? -1 M' 1 To TNf rnr(I eC11o.4 Of THE c.,AJE of THE ...404 u3F3}' G.wl+krt& oF 'fh. Srt,TNE' r Cr-telaTEK or S ECTION 3, Toc.445AIP 23 No tT►1, hAn►4c 4 EAyr W.M , writ nc‘ No •Lr+1 cs Arc of ScrtrM 107►74 Srlec.rr; Ay a wveie D nn TO 1C.tc Ar , C,try tkift 6f/ =CE, c <'-DCD w +DcR Ir.I� C. 1.-ary AI.GI 1vA FILE t ° 3444401; ThEr4CE AA 841H AL 0,04 r•E E.t' r C./A+E OF SAID s411>•0sl oAl 140 itrer, 04JreE CR Cm's, TO TA6 NGr:rN C. of 54.D 6w8DiveSIa! fib_ IcAXo-.f! "}i Tete cen.; ?'4 e CF. .`:C i T► IC-i131 Steger; - 1 r104Ce EACor Ito 1eti A cn.4 1.1 CF.rnE ALL INC TO CLN Rrtt o f SIsr Avelua Sc.■TH ; - THENCE $.)atiH ? 6 61ir Saurh To rite ce...•TEx4 of jwTN IIZTH STRLET, 661x/4 NC No.:.l►Itlh-r CoRNEiz OF 5ECrIQN p Toa.NS.IIP LS t4o0-114, g'Ar4c 4 EA4r, W•My cormi.14,1• sou*/ 014.-: ^144 I HE EAST (..,Ne GF 'SA,p SenicM 10 To AN IW TE2..ECTIOr1 yJ'r>ti THE 6.2NrH LI•. C•F arkn4 113D4 Snaar t wtrsMts cAu.aD Avort Sret"r,r, wn,c.l Is A Ck.rn+r or• The Erftr 4tiE op 10.2. e.r /0, DoarArur '45Z. SO PEST • fi M me No.ThEMsr ea^rcr2 of SMD Secgio•4; THENCE ko srrR.y ON rtge Sot■r1} L INE CF 54 .D bTRUIN' Tv ME NoATM4.4.VE144.1 CtRAelt o. t-or ISI, Bwoc4c I(0, C . h 4.44AM S MiE110014 GAsQFr.If - P OD1T1oN, 1)I.I543N le 2, AS Kfcc at) CO 11..044E120F R .+TS. PKaE 8Z, etc- _ j e t . ...___ • ' p! r K.c.rvb. ?lL1 Cat} r: P M Gu y Tf &E w,ITtE &j «., i1 we61 s i&D 4-or TO INC AJCR1M LINE OF S0-41b4 MTh STkeET, ScaEpMES CALLED Ptio4u.i.TA TRr r k' parITED „J sn,a n ot4; 'TNENcE E•rsrEo.Ly bLoN4 54 , !Jc/t.T}i LAME ID THE Pita5c . r C t11 L.,w r5 ow THE EAST L,.•+• OF sAto Str.TTOta/ ICS; THENCES.1ITH O'4 6AID Eta Ls* E Tb K.c• 5 s•••V ! A P.41or"MA ria-tr L(QCtl FE Er Sc.l, rH c: TH NoRME Cc - R • OF SecTic 10 4.4p 04 THE CE.4It.12c,.••,G OF ,r,4 mit 5rx .r, r Awl...N 4 So. m ZOrh S'TWOT; 1WEf& E ASr APY:tc$ IIO e ttr To THE NortT}tE P+;oo•L.r1oM OF Tf14 W.411rrtL4NE pF $LJ7uK 3 ALJ.t,4-row4 AcRtS M� KE[:4CD ,N /c.o..•(. 13 OF Pi- Mt' . 'PALE 22 L tet9e: F K.N6C� , THRICE 5..11..meru -1 Rkrr4 ,D ,* Th 0.4.1 4•+D s•1tD cG xtre_h4u•,E OF sA.o aacclt 3 Ttr A,k) .a,r 5tL1 C.r r„1 4 THE aeure ILL. 04E OF S ; THENCE n4cjegi . A WH•: .t+, C...nrtL./44. 14..,E Ta The JN1t.4r..t'-no4 of THE NoW ? A b.+NIM C e Ttou •.It O F ` � Ec - nc I, , Tiwb'. N .1 p AN.r.. 4E., W.M., n117 NICE _ - .:Nfi ALA-1144 ✓A ,D 440 tT11 AniD sc..1►. CENTU- i C.0 I Z,. C / iGlr 11:4A L,we TO TnE trobart L., cF So.,rn 140nt Sri r; THENCE w t.yt"�rt4Y Amb s:..1.4r111,AJ6 4 A L.Om� The .u.)44r4st.RLy 40NE OF ■a.TH 1 ri ST IC I: CT , AL.t4. K NoIAi /4 At. A,1fN Cc,#- M,n,E D. To rrrc µo•:7t4t/.L-Y L r..IE cF flit P4•,Fec &AST LACNP; 140. • - ft1c - I . • Sa. "1 1 f — /N C E „ Wb`-• lacy, AL.u14 tmi N L/•E TO rim Ccrllek+ -•a of (o 4I � nvanxte ,,u � ,+a:o ��++ r(nww rD,; v ASS ICJ`,H�/Nrrf ' F� ..D X.) • 5TLEd. C' 11.4. r1p.10 .1.%•44 A- 1Dr�Jt.t r1� 1 �7Gr�• / •;r iw+C:+rt rW 44.0..44 OA •D Ce rLIU.0.Ja TO mg ciArr d .frx of �t•K• •v / 1.NE I iAo ,, J Raft, ILeL N.LRaft, e0 T1 k�,+D JJ b 4. JLbMIVL L Rost)! 45 .tot•t.1A) al 1+E "w.rcrm*/ At,017 ,w.J iG `E "In PLAr 1 1uLw,ME 12 or ?LAM, row.4 75, Itit: o KGJ L.F `'CiNG (LA^+T Y j THENCE NoeT■4%.1E3r'EJZ4.• taw.* •D ex AO L•k:dJ1%&4.0.1E ZSO FLAT Molts; Gil L£•sy TD qN /N TEd- leCn onJ i r/1 E444J1.444 rG TtAN of The a,,rwMJAJC of ET i +r4 i,.. D A u..! ( #. w Rt4oui.,4 A3 � an, MI 1• , Sn rLLT"), l* "PlA rE • C /TuK i & SoLl fC.0 FPb iN CD. 6mtvb r TA�+cr`a ,ts REcotto• sM VouL••E II cF ftr Pot.. 2.4, REe..c•ia% cf K..,yc. CJL,...rir; THENCE t f rE n, riw , 700 F*.Er rio J.( oit Law; lb 19 - .a:LiI►M6..sr .Ll AAA 441 N 0r 14E ILTW ir.. ?ANC., eNtL...►1 lian,lr ° F WAT, geici bEtivet:TiveLl 1Al 4o4 0%0, T 6:4), vcc.....6 dZ.'. wwc Vo..,w / - 1, P 2 OP Deg PS, R,ccc+vs ✓' K ,�v4 C o • Al r y ; T}+ C M CG N 1 4-1►1 ∎ 67 E.,c l AL1044 A Kt', ,N ZiC0 ricer MOI&E oM. LL' 10 1NC Lueror ..NC OF "K. No.cltit-Ir.r '/14 oc :,Eci,orl 14 IN S ao TVA, 12.4E, 4..) 44.; TNEACE a•Tl*..l4ci nt.01*, wc 120 FEET /.t c orC L►s:r. Tta THE T1+MLtMD OF lhC - b4uhbwt%r1 1 , TTif_1J4CE Ac..uNcl GAi HS I A • A his knl %.:45M R‘r cem w 4'14 D,i.F-c-no4 Tp ► T1+E Sut+Th4LARf '/ ?sty pa lc-Tic-A/ of T L p.$) CAbrt 4 M 0 :4I OF Ti.A .T q , Eke 1 1���►cato ,y G•►•i T'µ,1t.,r Acd- 0.:90.44 TD ?OTT REct& e.» VOL.KINt (2 .. OF 6.4ft, PA4E 19, 1 K•f44 NT�I WA5hING10N; Tfi iJO4.iHwriie.lt,.1 .11Wr.,w v .1, Pio Lide.r10 M .w• b4ID ■4 ♦►.l AI/JA4 l■'r`a►'C17 t to /4/tratsccironi w il74 T it acL.IHG/TSfe.n(L 'W ,,JJ of 5717i 54 TkCvCE toak ALCv..4 :oho s‘un,L•trwQL.) Iw►lthld TO TIl6 �c►• thc Pr, re- lci., PA D.1.4.114.4 of titer /.1u- mEAtirE1i A.41144.114 of Tcx Si or to* ,n ruiT; THEPACE ALO 4 '410 are L fli A are1 PRO Cs eiaturi Ayp Zoita NvkTHE1f'•TEJd.i m TO T6 .S,.n r*1r1t'.r AA A►:L.IN of 56rfl AbENNi Saw r# ; THENCC SQZ4 - wt: tatrRLV 4t: 'A16 Sru/f1ENiL.Iez v t./ Too THE $.+LafjESr 4i4M4,./ OF Sok >ti /3S44 STmi21 714G/`k SA•4TIICriyn.64.r At. cir /hE 5 41 /#44**/ .I' ; ad 1 1 330th I • . F Dv P c/. 4 Ji1 A&I) 1•0.4C S.H RIErtt, TE /AL # PAL) o Pred2O4 'A 1hf t /tM1l pp L i i✓y� rw1�E.H of 7r1E bw9owiSn R11.41: THENCE 11L0"16 SAID 1H11c4D 14 A C•LNc.4'4L O,afccrt -' re, The /p1 A :•' "��✓ tr1le:NTjo,./ OF 7740 J01.T1444.•..5r(Kcy 40 of &cn! gr• Si!► ccr, ilS Pul►rrt S • flta.arxJlawN AGJ. flonl , rte.cca,DEp i,4 1104..•.tC 2 of PLOTS, 'Pm+c.F 100, Re4c4ix. cF (i. 4 (;oc.NTV ; TH ENCE no 9.•6.:ff•srK.4.y �11,:rdG It, p.p 401.1Tht:,4iTr E R7er U 4/%4 )ADD snit /74 eAlc MAN+•N /OSO Feet No 4' O - 4w1 ••we• 1 -c•TI wlfp 1F1{ No 1Zf11 wV5TL•:11.1.'I 304E Do= L.ar 3Z 34.:•cr. 13, 601 ID ILLtih11Q4uM A. no niGnICE 1.ot1111 •.+c:-sr E 1. QFJC. wt, . D No•ITHwE gSitty HND THG Thweyrr�c y I xrE rut./ Tnetac F 70 me r►+r•NO of n,E tic.IJ rtM1SN ' K11/ &r� ; THE'i4CE I.JESrE•244 Ne /L •D 1j' D , 21SO Geer 0.40 •LE o To ,41. Fb. 17.1. 14 The wu � , NE OP T . 33, R ►� ,oc rME+�.asa�M r I i.1.44 14tvKCC k DI ( T t Cc klE 7D rtIC a� .r of 3 '7 /►IC f w�..:r 1a4 Ca E..er. nut \. Kll rtT• of -44.44i / /'IEEJC.E �l�a*1•/ r� c . r1. D. J rata. wt s.. mot pF S.rJO K mKf - APPQp►••yAric.y Ea) .. FaET' to A Fb•.ar cP►'c .re rtiE a.1..r1i wNe or 1R.ic.r Z2, of :j #. It., PC red TEAL( te i.4.4 Ttilic. 7`. THENCE we-sr IOC° FEET J 1 k.w 10 101G t;A;n+rgllu•vE •F NE • P 1 c• Flc - NAA «.'Ay i".cr .t w.ow.d AS ✓ � r ^.1 /1144rNdtL WA/ :*11tH N11 o 'to 9c-:+G 16E /N4 o' CrtE ~ 1 A r rb . • .E OF S�Ia.i 124 Tf `�uukr�) 7KENCE corn* , i - r: 1 rc +t � }- ll "1 tuttaicl44. /) tt+n4 ;ADD ct/v7t1 INC To TH6: �Tttn1 PoaGc J 4 PYT10N CS r►1E wcST L,w1E OF 8'- *.- A Z I'`.trfogres d ADDiriaN, Ak4.v• To F'1 -1 r 114E lap v 14 Vac..4lour 13 oC pcATS, Ai.. rr 3Iv rt . OF IC"kr GT14r•1T1, LX) *lief lisr J; TH ENCE rso Krett11L i ALUNr t0 .t0 osesr t.1 0 , 1e 4.4b rrs Sc11- n1E0Ll,1+ 'Mhotflors+c,AnGN Tc ThE AbrCTNWCea Cdf'WLK OF. 314.3) B i41 V fl M C 044 KTMEI/4 -tl At..tnCa The E;msr L o rftc '•1tor 820 ►►b.1 N. C F V U w t. 't 3 F et_T G F 64.p `.E'ct.oN 10 Tx) p Y; ,,ur "8.' Qr e.aitrD As Zr.:, ►N,4• me wrzy— &Atha mix CIALNie R' CC -+� -n 04 10, 7+ 4..o•ra, THE &utcr• t. e v e&ae 1'I. :4 fctr It III C. SOWN AAAd.,.w4 Cos; 4 601,4lf b 'TG _`, N V,n1c'..,vr i i1i-.D A •. .,►r (O, MO 1, c,QOc D L.n+ot.ti eras Frt.t !J° 53528; TN CNCE e:Mr rl4, ►■ARG,N eT TNE/`k.E s.•►, r 4ZI AS FLt r Tb R ".•r „g /}•.p t' ►, c F the =... • P7 i ON T }I EN“" t o r1�A�+ -F.r.- To Til t o J►1 1.. NE OF Ctauc.KNMErVT Lr To mE cENTERt.►,.1E z t wit new /4101 r•44A% tJAr ::r► +n.,; THENCE A4.40(4.44 �tru• �. i 4 j•� •v r t.LC IN& To rH E .44'14/ PI A.,,ut .at= ►NE gpe>w /1663. CoG j - -r f tfi : no ,C); THE&J u. re:t..�+ 4 4.0^ b1.b sattnt 41.E JAC w1 ear L. 'NE OF .5 C Ti , J /Q; MENCE ,IOL.'THERLY Atc..c. r L. /fir kr e r L._,rG . cF SA ID cc riAM /0 TO 4ke ^w &IP# L/tiE ( a a. ye - ;, N. 7 �l t A+i r LT QP [IF zA 6L cnc,.t )O, TLENCC c i ,riLi :.c > � ' , )Ler.2 THE fic►:T.4 t_butr rF is n Cn rEXwatel.+r L ,r t, ID Trt‘ t `� t'& Nr1. ,rrL. P f,, MA0 ��•►r `btim, T}{Eti«CE Nor.'t►,ett�� • 4.(1.w, 1a� C 6NTCXL , ".) rT. INS ..4 T . 4F The 214.4l �- r ? r 1 • • y, ' . • r- tis10 � r K 1 J WEriiE►:� /lh.D NGt 1�I.4 ALs'NeI EAST LA: Pi Dra..'')sw►S,r IZ4 9",D It IO 7NE CE4•4 0,: Satni l�'\o;,E STKEET" £k rt:N oc D AA:WEAL9 j THEJ-ICE t J� ors "IGLi 1.0 Nts me. re ia �4NC OC areino IC, n paC recur; EkrcAiraZD, TO Fe, r1.)T G eceimMiA,Ke . EXCep L&7$ I 8 ANito J, d w4. 4 ; - r. 'S Z , C.G. 1 1..4.P4•+1s Mewa Cln•cO::4 Dwas4av r 3, As I;l_c ,,r 10a4.44 , 1.0 OF ri , r j - c P;36 hcct o c . nw. L“+At_ ro Kr Aa ur o Pr• , s. re. Do;ECT10N. r..+tt L \►t Is/ Fe,c- L1Nt_F k j1O•Nu6J • T 4 30 ?L. i`'ili4. 044 3o 114. ici64 ... attached to the of Range 4 East, M.N., in Kin Lot 15, Section said 10, lots by operation 3 h of at the i ntersection W N., in g County Washington, as folio ,599) w ith the southerly gton described as foil D 23 North, said the ct ion )r margin s y margi of Primary State Hi follows: B . 1 ISR Sectiop 10; thence South of East 9hway Mar r f feet to the tr 1 29'066 East along said Marginal Way in the hor to Po of beginning; • East west quarter of feet t to Morth 87 30'37' n West 726.40 9. thence South 78 " st er 1 margin . ee ; -_15; thence South 01 Wes g 43 2 y - aforesaid * ) x Wes West feet to the West west 415.05 feet; plat South i est along said west line to the said Government ine parallel to and 820 feet the west line Riverton; thence easterly along the north line line northerly `long said said said north line 5 Trarerso Property parallel line 376.01 fe et said Northwest a l'ne thence p y as described in deed to the No tot 15; thence the westerly easterly along the north line od re `orded under f i l e � st tarner of th margin margin of East M.ar i of said Trarerso property 474.74 .74 9: feet 9 n to the point of beginnin Way: :then D °Party 474.74 f ce northerly along eat to 9 sa1A west • • •. . • of t.4 44 1 "Ale— VOri -T A tract of land comprised of that portion of Boeing Field/King County Inter - „etic�nal Airport property located•ogtaide of the Seattle City limits, situated , :.,•ction 33. Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian and • . t ,on 4, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian in King County, .•,.r,tn,�con. de•cribed• as follows; • •• - tk••7 t nn i ng at the Northeast corner of Section 4, Township 23 North, 4 East, Willamette Meridian, then along the Easterly border of sail ..action 4 which is also the Seattle City Limit Line bearing ::. 0 p ° 20'05" West 1256 feet. more or less. to the Northerly margin •• of :.uu r.folk Street; n North 88 ° 3 b' o pa 35 feet; le ° r " N ��S eat; ten North ii` West eat; then south tose►> West 596,646 f eat; then South 89 13'33" west .1)._0, feet to a point on the Easterly margin of East Marginal way South; then following said margin North 23 ° 41'00' West 1373.66 feet; then :•..uth 89 ° 27'50" East 380 teat; then North 150 feet; then North d�. ":7'50" West 456.27 feet; then North 21 ° 40'59' West 84.67 feet; then North 89 ° 58'17" East 518.49 feet; then North 29 West 372.42 feet; then ':.,uth 89 West 474.62 feet to the Easterly margin of East M.,ryinal Way South; then along said margin North 2341'02" West 1G•ic..;7 feet; then North 66 East 149 feet; then North 23 west 259 feet; then South 66 ° 18'58" West 149 feet to the Easterly margin ct U. Marginal Way South; then along said margin North 23 ° 41'02" West '.:e..'.2 feet; then along • curve to the left having • radius of 2914.92 feet; a chord of 1278.21 feet and an arc d of 128E1.68 feet; then Nc.r th 49 6 00'52" West 643.39 feet to the North line of Section 33. Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette meridian; then along said North line which is also the Seattle City Limit Line South 89 ° 17'40" Lust 868 feet. more or less, to the centerline of the filled riverbed (.4 the Duwanish River; then following Southerly and Easterly along this curving centerline of said filled riverbed, which is also the Seattle City Limit Line, • distance of approximately 3400 feet to the North t..: Je•r of the Southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, h.en,;e 4 Last, Willamette Meridian; then along said Section border which also is the Seattle City Limit Line South 88 ° 32'07" East 1t1'P feet. more or less, to the Westerly margin of Airport Way South; then along said margin South 17 ° 32'25" East 199 feet, more or less; then South 21 47'12' west 25 feet; then also along the Westerly m.uyin of Airport Way South, South 17 ° 32'ld" Last 11151 feet; more ur less, to the Easterly border of Section 33. Township 24 North, hange 4 East. Willamette Meridian; then along said tasterly border. which is also the Seattle City Limit Line f.t5 feet, more or less. to the POIt1T Of BEGINNING; said tract of land contains an area of approximately 165 acres. 1 INb` . Aft /,1e"e 1 6. 4 ` 0 '' Jeffrey W. winter �. Oi, 6a �, , li b �� (I ee a �. e e ,•_. ,•-� M v.. s eLs_ �•. —f-. I w • .t v c% r Olt% �i r' r F 7Z I 4.` ". 11% w. 11 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 November 21, 1984 5400A:mis ORDINANCE NO. Introduced by Proposed No. ..J43 AN ORDINANCE establishing the date for an election on the question of annexation; and assumption of indebtedness of certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the City of Tukwila located within the McMicken Heights area; and declaring an emergency. GARY GRANT J 84 -711 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. The City Council of Tukwila by Resolution No. 907 and 920 has expressed its support for the proposed annexation. SECTION 2. Resolution 920 does satisfy the provisions of RCW 35A.14.020 requesting the calling of an election to be held among the qualified voters therein. SECTION 3. The King County Boundary Review Board has approved the proposal as submitted on October 11, 1984, all in accordance with RCW 36.93.100. SECTION 4. A special election shall be held on the 5th day of February, 1985, within the proposed annexation area on the question of whether or not said area should be annexed to the City of Tukwila; and that all property within the area to be annexed, shall, upon annexation, be assessed and taxed at the same rate and on the same basis as property within the City of Tukwila is assessed and taxed to pay for all or any portion of the outstanding indebtedness of the city, including assessments for taxes in payment of any bonds issued or debts contracted prior to or existing as of the date of annexation. SECTION 5. The boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation are hereby described as follows: SECTION 6. Notice of election shall be published as required by law. SECTION 7. The county council finds as a fact and declares that an emergency exists and that this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health or safety or for the support of county government and its existing public institutions. 2 I TRQQD,UC // AND � READ for the first time this 3 day of /�e�CX/1N•UYitJ , 1964 PASSED this 31.1- day of O - - , 1981 . ATTEST: Beginning at the intersection of the Tukwila City limits and the south right -of -way margin of State Highway 518; thence westerly along said south right -of -way margin of State Highway 518 to the east right -of -way margin of 42nd Ave. South; thence south along said east right -of -way margin of 42nd Avenue South to the south right -of -way margin of South 164th Street; thence east along said south right -of -way margin of South 164th Street to the Tukwila City limits; thence northerly along said Tukwila City limits to the south right -of -way margin of State Highway 518 and to the beginning. ? 4�til�O�C . C of the Council APPROVED this l /e'� day of KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1413 ,SEE JCL'j0: EPIG-3 -$7 fiR.E D('E5r-RIc:r PMME(KnotsJ SEATTLE 3 r a 1 � FIRE DISTRICT 1 ANNEXATION RIVERTON ANNEXATION FOSTER ANNEXATION THORNDYKE ANNEXATION 14th Ave. Exlt .x241:. S. 128th St. Sea-Tac Incorporation Boundary - Includes Thorndyke, Foster and Riverton Annexation Areas 111111/11 ......::1 l :■p■:9...91.■ ■ ■I ' : : ?��1::8:::::@: t ::■: r■::: :'■►• • ° ��::: IR 441891k 411111411,11: 1. 1: 405 t, Amp. :::r■: 1 ■ RENTON TUKWILA . mu. r: N�rr! v,..., r.,..;.;.2i•,:PMC!!+;^•m:n•;:rr -7":x.;,.7 r.. 111111111111 111111111111111111111111111 111111111 011 !I:111-III11111IIIII�I�III�III I III I. I1�1111- 1. 11�1�I1�I1III1JIIJI1I1III1I -I1111111- II11I111II111'' 111''111111111 1I1111I11 11111111 0 16TH5INCH 1 2 3 -, 4 ._ _,__:.,.- ,,,; _6 7.,;,:,...;..-- 8 9 10 11 "MUM"' 12 ,... ...: `IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS I • CLEAR THAN THIS; NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 0 £ 6E 8. d3 91E 9I3 hZ ez; '3 z IF , THEQUALITY OF -THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 'j 6 9 9 s E ? Ww 0 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 rcutezatco4 Zl fzdate - 7c:ze n;ztniet I INTRODUCTION Nobody said it would be quick) The annexation process has been delayed but not stopped. This brochure has been prepared to update you on the status of the proposed annexation to the City of Tukwila and to provide additional answers to common questions about annexation. If you did not receive the March 1988 Question and Answer bro- chure or if you have other questions, please call the Planning Department at 433-1849. FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION PROCESS Why Is the annexation not on the Nov - ember 1988 ballot as expected? The King County Council had two weeks from the dote of the Boundary Review Board's (BRB) decision until the Records and Election deadline, to pass the re- quired ordinance. They failed to take any action during that time. Therefore, Tukwila has passed Its fourth resolution supporting the election- method annex- ation, specifying approval of the modi- fied area and requesting that King County now place the annexation on the February 7, 1989 ballot. King County passed ... the - -- required -- ordinance- - November 14, 1988. What did the BRB decide on the boundary? As you can see on the enclosed map, the BRB made two changes to the Fire District's boundary: 1. They expanded the northern limit up to the Seattle City limits and out to the centerline of the Duwamish River. This splits the 16th Avenue South bridge in half dividing responsibility between King County and Tukwila. 2. They deleted the area east of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks south of the 1 -5 overpass and east of Empire Way; including approximately six homes on 56th Place. South, south of Juniper Street. LAND USE • Will people be allowed to place mobile homes on their property? No. Tukwila does not allow mobile homes as dwelling units. However, if you currently have one on a lot, you may continue to use it as a dwelling. The City will allow replacement of existing mobile /manufactured homes with manufac- tured homes so long as Its an upgrade. How will the zoning change if the area is annexed? The City of Tukwila has adopted pre - annexation zoning ordinances. For your own copy or map, you may contact the City Planning Department at 433 -1849. UTILITIES Will electric rates go up If I annex to Tukwila? Rates will not change with annexation to Tukwila. Seattle City Light and Puget Power boundaries do not change with annexations, so whoever provides you with service will continue to do so after annexation. ___ Tukwila has an underground_ordinancs for overhead utility" linos. When does the City require the undergrounding? New and Improved streets are required to hove utility lines placed underground. Residents and businesses on these new or improved streets must then run lines to their buildings underground. SOLID WASTE What is happening with King County's plans to build an Incinerator at the Black River Quarry site? At this time incineration (Le., energy/ re- source recovery) Is not recommended as . a waste management alternative. No incinerators ore being considered for construction. A Final Environmental Impact Statement on Solid Waste Management Alterna- tives, Issued September 30, 1988, recom- mended heaviest reliance on recycling activities, with a goal of 65% for King County by the year 2000. Education, public Involvement, state legislation, and financial old to cities will support this goal. What effect will this decision have on the operation and Improvement of the 16th Avenue South bridge and other capital Improvements? Tukwila and King County are meeting to resolve responsibilities for the bridge and other improvements. These discussions may or may not be concluded by the time of the election. These discussions are important because the costs of maintaining, operating and eventually replacing the bridge are quite. high. How will I be notified of the February 7, 1989 special election? King County Records and Elections will provide legal notice in the newspaper. The voting will occur at your regular polling location. If you have questions, please call Records and Elections at 29&1565. What will the ballot generally look like? • FOR ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS • - AGAINST - ANNEXATION AND ADOPTION OF PROPOSED ZONING AND LAND USE REGULATIONS. ❑ C • FOR ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS _❑ .• AGAINST ASSUMPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS ❑ GENERAL If Tukwila eventually has the same boundary as the South Central School District, will there be any change to the school district? No, the school district is an Independent body and is not required to change in any way. Will my addrbss change if I annex to Tukwila? No, your address and zip code remain the same, although you may now use Tukwila Instead of Seattle, Washington as place of residence or business. CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 II1III1III1IIIH I�I�I�II�III�II�III�II�III�II�I�I�Ii�III�II�I�I�I 1111I 1I 1 - 1411L. 1. 1111111111I111JIIIJIIIIIIJIIDII- I1P1II111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 - 6.:......._... 7,;: . . 8 9 10 11 MNEI1""iT 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED.DOCUMENT.IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS- :NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO I THE UAL ITY- -OF -THE-ORIGINAL- DOCUMENT 0 10TH01NCH 1 2 3 oc 6Z 9t' LZ 9Z 9Z hZ CZ' ZZ I,Z 1 1 I I I , I, 9. • a . 0 •4 8 4. 4 4 • 4 4 4,0 Ar0 !e0 arl • e • '1•E- 1-11a4-4.14:Y •=2. De 3 • _ .200.(11-1?) A/37 • DIZAINIAGRE 1141K '0A-12C.144RC.E... 11.1 Pl..AGE.. rag a t-vNit-turf r -o 1444 4E-TTLE..frietrr foLaTrogi-15, EA.) Pt_'. AT '200 - e•oTTON 132.6.1r*.arc- GITG4 G TYPO o‘ITLANIE. TE.tievzogy Geis/444e. PITc.-14 11 -4•2‘,/, IDA eZ g."--:=ILe TH14. .51.1$2a4142Mg..--7-...,4 To OMAN rog A MINI Hurl or 40 ca.•••(5. ' . x!IGT PLATroekty. coNTOAcTola TO RFAvaig. TP-4-_4o Mee- or jzga•ccriTro maga. T7 i VEATIC•AL thL ewe) • 0 P•12.44.Va2TY GA:34W 4 .A..s3a-iatzue. Lay-our eF-FE426.1.44(.. PJJJT VMS 01111111.:allp .••■•■••••"-- .01611■- 1.0.11.1.6 0.11 7.2"f HA. • feb SURCHARGE PLAN STAGE 2 Piraer-i2TY LIN(' d so' m 1.. 50, a ART L HUR JAMESENGINEERS INC C. J. CONLEE PROJECT COORDINATOR • KOCH,SACHS&WHITTAKER ARCHITECTURAL CONBULTANTB 0016410 Jr.L. 14 METRO Municipality a mefropoinin 1. ;chit: I I.' CONTR. NO. T/F40-6S SOUTH NG EAU ANNEX "" MAY 1985 GRACING PLAN &UPC AAAAA .116:C30843 MU C-5 1.111 6 0, i36 rTTh 4.4 ; , , , A g -; ,....,. ,7.1,..-7(41TegnT.TMR:mii.Axo, vat..,27,4,4,,:.:,t!,:„.;4::if...,,,,,,,,,,....,,,,,....,,,,,„... „ , • . , . d , , , ,.., . ,. ._,._....,.. ..... . . , , ,, , ,.. ".t I Z. ' ,.. .{, ,,,,,,,,=:,,',,,k-2 , .. 4.^.44--.."''` - • C-,.." 'ilt+•.‘iiti-4.1,4".•' P, '`.:1'';'' '''''';'', ' ',*: ''''''' ''''(""I'''!:`• •,,,..4•1'hAAk's :i'(1.',1.:!'tt.1 ,I'exii ' v.i I. '4%.'d„,,r,W,,A,;0;„ , ,i, „.„ ,....*,,,,z, 7 0,1. ,„' ' 4,4,N.1„'.7•1.,•4.',V.•':"11'• 74 ,';',-P''.),•4' c■`!'"'llt'i4.trA.,,c,y,C0,4: 1 . rs,,, I MillIIIIIIIIILNIMILAWM1111111111141_111±11111111111}1111111111111.111 11111111111111111111111111)111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 0 ""H"NCH 1 2 3- _4, - ,.. 5____. 6 7 ..8 9 ' 10 11 "M"15""Y 12 , IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO 0 c 6Z ed L.Z 9Z SZ ,E C 1 1ZZ LZ 1 THE 'UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6 ei hi 91 Si 1 1 7 LI ..- o Iliiihnitunlinduillinduillimtmiliiitimilmtlinililiilmilliii II-duo-Z[111m no liti mil nu ini 11115-1111171151-1-111151311Miggllifili fill 4111111 IIIIIIIIiiIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 ;:• ••?(AIN,v ,(•• .4,i.",••••,"••• • ,. • • ••••••;.v.:4 ir }, 0 N Glenda' erto, 11111111111 I ' , 1I II1I(�I ,I 1 I11I 1i I @I I I l ill!!nI;l III 1 lI II Ii 4' 1 1 I 1,111'.'111'11!1.,111111111 I I1 I I I III 1I ... I l�i�llllliill' 66_ f 1 FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Study Area: Sub -Area Boundaries Legend 1 Study Area Boundary Sub -Area Boundary Sub -Arca 1 North Industrial 2 Sub -Area 2 East I -5 3 Sub -Area 3 Empire Way South 4 Sub Area 4 Allentown CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. ` NORTH ATTACHMENT B FIGURE 2 IIIIIIIIl1111111ii1iIl illi1I111I11II1111111I111M1I11 .1-111__ 111111IIIII 1111IIII1I1 I11-11111111I1111.LIlll_I_IIII_ III_ I_ IIJIIJII1LIIUI! I111111111I1111111I1111111I1111111I1111111111 .10III ►1111111 2 3-, _.4.. - - -..- ,_.._.5___.. ..._ .._ 6 ..._8 9 10 ' 11 MM,EIN ERMAN, 12 IIF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO II . 0£ 6Z 8G LE ez SE �z Ez; zz �z ()THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT:, `6 9 L 9 s '7 E z 1 Ww 0 lllllilllllllllllllll11111111111111,111111111.111111III .011111.I�1111111,1111111 llllrllllllll Hunt 11111111 1111 IIII�IIIhIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIIil Jill - idiIi it Ill ii lill inlinillli1I11 U141111111(ui.11i11 10:iti oIJ11141111141 !lipluilu11111 0 ,eTNSINCH 1 J J i_ 1 ill 1111I •i1 1ili J1 I 1 1111 I IIt_1I 1I1 1W I .111 l.. 11 Iii. iii li i li li i III1 Ii Ii I FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY King County Comprehensive Plan - Urban Highline Community Plan Legend Industry Light Manufacturing Remaining Study Area Undesignated CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT C FIGURE 0 1 3 4.: —.. 5 ._..__... _.6_ 7. -._. 8 9 10 11 12 1e THS INCH MAOEINO® IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • CLEAR THAN'THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE .TO 06 ez eG Lz ez sz 17a az; Izz Le . THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT , 6 8 ' s '' s z vol O nii iiii iiii iiii J I rr KING COUNTY, 1111111111111111111111101 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 2 3_, ....:---- -4__,,-_,.,..,.....,....5„,_._. L i • !CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO . ii • IF THIS .MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS oc 6Z 8G LZ 9Z SZ 476 EZ 1 ZZ T 19,THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 5 9 L 9 S 47 C . Z 1 v474 0 1111.1111111111161111111111111111111011111111)161'11111011agiWiliffill Ifilliii11111 lin (Ili 1111 illiriill 111111FIIEWII PilitirdrifIGITHIRTITiiielill11[11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 • FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY 1 EXISTING TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN MAP 0:65S1 !LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE PUBLIC FACILITIES CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. 40°I‘ NORTH ATTACHMENT D FIGURE 11(11111.41111111111(11111111111j11111111111111111111rMilliiii11111111111111111111111111111111 -- 6 9 ' 10 • 11 MOE IN GERMANY 12 (ID w*NE!MWv.'WW • 0 7, N FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Existing Land Use and Community Facilities • Singlc Family Multifamily Commercial Industrial Mixed Industrial/ Commercial Park Community Facility Community Ccntcr Library Swimming Pool CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. d'IN■ NORTH ATTACHMENT E FIGURE 7 1 I ITI I III I I I 1 IA L I I ] I • 1. i , 1L i11, ,_ 11:11111111111t1111111111111111011(111111I : sL a'' • s . i , . , s • , . . , . 111111111111111 I 111111111111111111 11111111 FIIII11IIII n . I 1 I I i I I I I I i I I I i I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I i I I I I 0 la TUS INCH 1 2 3-, ..1.!,...._,.... .... • 5_ 6 ... ., ..... . ... 7..,,....\.___ .„.13, 9 • 10 ' 11 mADEINGERmANY 12 , • , IIF THIS MICROFILMED.DOCUMENT IS LESS \ i CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO, C9 0€ 6Z 8C /2 9E SZ VE EZ 1 EZ L •0THE• UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT168L9stEzi Nno Iiiiiliiiiiiiiihiiiimilinilimilinh,liOloillniiiii*illiiiiiiiiiiiihiiiiiii iiii.iiii 111111111111 1111E13-17111113111,1, 1175171-1711 RiTa17111T11-11fril FIFIIIIT01111111111111,1111111111111111111111,11111,1111,111111111,11111111111,11111111111111111111111111111111111 V '4 0 N Glondalt l2 N rfl)T t3 tcr FIRE DISTRICT # 1 ANNEXATION STUDY Existing Zoning and Shoreline Designations Legend Na-siE2 0.0001 Suburban Rcsidcntial Single Family Rcsidcntial Mcdium Dcnsity Multifamily High Dcnsity Multifamily Maximum Dcnsity Multifamily/Profcssional Office Community/Ncighborhood Busincss Light Manufacturing Hcavy Manufacturing kattKifiiil Manufacturing Park CDPotcntial Zones King County Shoreline Program %XXX Rural )•••• Urban CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT F FIGURE 8 „ , „. „ ... . , .. .... • . ..„ , • - , • ,,.. ,,..„.„-:,:i,,,,,,-.:, .,, L., , ::: 11111111111111111111111111111111111i1111111111110Nwpriiiiimmai_111 1 lopiolipiii1111iiiimiThinliwil111101iiippri111q11111111111111111111111111111111 -- 2 3-, - - .5 _ 6. , .7 \, 8 9 • 10 - 11 WOE IN GERMANY 12 • _.........1 ...„-.=.2 • , . . IIF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS \ CLEAR THAN THISNOTICE, IT IS DUE TO • oc 6Z EIL • LZ 9Z GZ 473 CZ 1 ZZ LZ Q. TIE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT.,: i 7 L 9 G t E 1111111111111111110111111)111111111111111111111111111111.11111111,11,1161111.1.11141111W711717M1171751 i—IIHITIEITIRITII—Iiiiiiialiffirillii■lirffiliiii iihnimilliiiionillohniiimilipilhiliiiiiiiiiii.milli.oholiiptillidimoilillimimill 'MM., • • • • • • .q • • •20444,,,VS,..., (•,,, • 0 :v • lRv)rt(fl 4 . ,;.......,., J• .„,,,,-,--- - ----- .., . :•• , .. • .': ... • . • . . •. / . '''' 11111)1111111)111111111111111111111111111111111M111411111111111M111M1111 0 le THS INCH 1 2 3 ''. - . u,i)141-1-LPHI-Li-Litizitilim-pilly11111)iiriplimiliimplilltilliiii111111riii111111 ._. 6 9 ' 10 ' 11 mADEIN GERMANY 12 t '',•.:,.., • - 7-.L....- ---B. CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO' • IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT .1S LESS ,'' .. • • tz ,o,THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. 1 6 e L 9 G '7 111111111111111111)11111d1111111111111110111111011(111111,1,1111,Phi011,4141111.011 111111i1 1111111111111111 TIT1111.11111111717141fih117110171FiraliiM11111111'11111111111111111111111111111111111,1111111111111111,1111111111111(111111111111111111111111111 • • • I • , FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Proposed Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations LeRend Egia:g NOP 57'511 1.:"6 Low Density Residential High Density Residential Professional/Office Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Parks and Open Space Public Facility CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER 8 ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT I FIGURE 9 ' • oe 6Z • EIL L2 9Z GZ 17Z CZ: ZZ FIRE DISTRICT 1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub -Area 1. ' en Light Industry ® Heavy Industry CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH A ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT J FIGURE iI�I W 1 111 111 111L11III111I141II1II141II1II {If 141yI II1IIII II II I III - 111 4 J � _IIl L111I1 I IJ I�L���L U11I1I 1j141 111111IIIIII�l11llpl0ll ll � 1 O siHHH 1 3 7 ^ S 9 1p 11I,�I" 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED .DOCUMENT.. IS LESS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO L 9 E z wW o CLEAR THAN THIS 6 e 9Zz Ez; 'ZZ �z 0 THE ,UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL �DO iIUMIENTl llllllllll{ 1114111111{ 11�111L111IIIIIII114 �IIl�ll►I►►►i1�J► Ili►► 1►II►►)1Ju111111IlIIIIUIIIilll4 OF. 6Z BG LZ 9Z l _..111....1 .._ 11 IIIIII�IIl111111IlIIlIIIIII1111I1111 441111, LIIIIIIIII11111411111111111111f111111141111 11111 nu 11{1 II{I Ilil IIII 1111 III111111 I111{{I11 1111111111111 IIII III IIII I 7, itt. P,,As/e*,4*,c,?4,■ k~:4- FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub-Area 3 Legend OWN Single-family Residence [777MI Low Apartments ZW,064 11111111111! Multiple Residence/High Density Regional Retail Business Light Industry Heavy Industry CCA inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH ATTACHMENT K FIGURE 1 . . ,'"'t • - ' THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT- IS LESS w. 0 , iiiiiiiIrro001111111111111111111111111111111ININIHIIIIIIIIIviiiiiciapp-01.1111111111101litusiolLapililiwi1111111011p111101100111111011111111111 • 0 " YMS *le" 1 3'1 8 10 ' 11 $*0E040E00441 12 ; • CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO 6 8 L. 9 0£ 6E 8C LZ 9Z GZ 17Z EZ EZ THE UAL1TY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT •;: � {�� � ?�• '•••:::•:•.:.• ' '�', • M, FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Tukwila Proposed Zoning/ Sub -Area 2 .& 4 Lefrond cf^;.• Single-family Residence Low Apartments Multiple Residence /High Density TOW* nrniNAri M111111111111111 111111111111 Professional and Office Community Retail Business Regional Retail Business Light Industry ME Heavy Industry CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. fi NORTH ATTACHMENT L FIGURE _ 10 • 11 wcE1N0EEMANi 12 ;.:. � _ - I 111 i►� I�I�IjI ijlj�l` �1iliL `�lai,i�lhl�'ll�'11�11`�I�III I�I`I�III�III�I Ijl �ijill`111111� . ;;. I i —i— I -I—► -� �w I 9 • ._ I .il �Iill i�l j�l I� II�i ICI ICI ICI I��I I�.I_I�-I ICI ICI ICI ICI ICI I I I I 1.� I� 1 1 Ijil�l� I � l � I I � 1 � � � I I :— �— ......_ S z WW p. 0 "7" 'NC" 1 IF THIS' MICROFILMED DOCU I N IS� DUEETO� • S � £ CLEAR THAN THIS•NOTICE, 8 e 9 �C az ez; 'zz �a ,QTHE' UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT , � 5Z I nlllnn nnlnllllminil nu iinl t IIiIIIIUiIlnlli4ullinhullili Iniilli11111iilil�lllill ►nlliul nlllnil nIIIInI 6Z .\ 9G LZ 9Z ..- - . IIIIIIII IIIIU11iilllnnllullnnllml11ii1 1l11.111i11.11111111 tiliilull uilrm uu iiil lul lln lin llli lln Ilnlnlllnll lui iul u1i uil m FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY HEIGHT EXCEPTION AREA UP TO A INCLUDING 115' CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. 4°1h‘ NORTH ATTACHMENT M FIGURE 1 � _ - � . - - - - � • � U=s���3��=�`, _ICI I C I I C I l i l ICI ICI 1 ICI I I1I1lil I l�l II l I ICI I li1l IN Ij -1 I ICI1I! _I IICI IC IC-I Ill 1 ICI i I - I�lI lj-I �-1 = i-I J- IJI � - �-l1-I1j1I I�I I �j� I h1I I I11I lj� I 1I 1 1 1 �yI l�I��� i .1111 11111111 1 0 16TH3INCH 1 2 3 4,-.. -._ _,,,_ .5__. _ ._ .. _. __.. _... 6. _ ..:..._....7�..1 8 9 • 10 11 MAOEINOEPMMIY 12 .!IF THIS MICROFILMED.DOCUMENT.IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS•NOTICE, IT IS•-DUE TO OE ez eG Lz 9z sz ti CZ zz tz Q.THE UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT ;�l 6 8 L 9 s 47 C z l WW 0 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�lllllllllli�lill�llllilllliminIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiICllllllll�llll IIII llll 1111 IIII IIII Illlfll lllljllilliiill► II�IIIIjIIIIIIIIIlIIIIjffIl11111111IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII inn 11 • 12.1.••:.;•"••••••L•'''•"‘r• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H i I 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 q 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 p 1 1 0 1 I - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [II 411111.1.1111111_111111111111jillhplilip.1111011111111111111111111111111 111111 1 111111 111 3- • • 9 • 10 11 "EIN'ERIUMY 12 1111111 . IIF THIS MICROFILMED 'DOCUMENT IS LESS. • / CLEAR THAN. THIS'NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO oe 6Z Be L2 9Z SZ 473 EZ ZZ IZ THE UALITT OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT., 6 8 L 9 9 '7' 3 "0 1111 ,111111111111. 011111111 .11111111 11111111 .11 .111111111 .111 ,(011111 ,I1!1 .10-100 I 11111111 1101010 Itt1 IIII 11111104 jar J11.111111 )111.41.11111111141111111111111111111111111111 • FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Existing Zoning and Shoreline Designations Legend a:MP 0.0.0.40.6 aitti:80411 ::11M000.1 %TIM EMS EME. Suburban Residential Single Family Residential Mcdium Density Multifamily High Density Multifamily Maximum Density Multifamily/Professional Office Community/Neighborhood Busincss Light Manufacturing Heavy Manufacturing Manufacturing Park Potential Zones King County Shoreline Program ■xxxx Rural Mi.. Urban CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER 8 ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIGURE 11.2 ,..L:3) • FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY R -1 SINGLE FAMILY R -4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY C1 NEIGHBORHOOD RETAL C 2 REGIONAL RETAL M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY . CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIGURE 1 11111111111I111J111J1IIII111111I111 111 IIIIIII11111 1111 _.l-�I�-IITTIIIIIIIIIIIII III III I_ W11111111111111111111J111lllllll111lllllii1_I1 I11111111111111111111111III111111111111i1 1111111111 0 ,aTHSINCH 1 2 3- 4 5 6 7 S. 9 • 10 • IF THIS. MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS. NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO oc 6z 8. cz 9z sz +�z C3: zz T ?, THE UALI_TY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMEN�T , `6 8 9 s C z WW p 1111111111111111111111111J11 III111111 IIII1IJII III111111 IIIIIIIII III111111. �iilrlll Il ill liii Iii' Ilii 1111 IIII 111111111111111111i$111.1-11(1115311g11111111111171115 i11111I11 111111111 111111111111111111 1111/1111 11)(11111 111111111 Iiii1IIII 111111111 1111111111 11 MAOEINGERMANY 12 • • VA% m.,sstnx imm ms^^k ... •••,•,••• I Gle )1. ik `IA s r ST FIRE DISTRICT. 1*1 ANNEXATION STUDY R-1 SINGLE FAMILY R-4 LOW APARTMENTS RMH MULTIPLE RESIDENCE HIGH DENSITY C-1 NEIGHBORHOOD RETAL 07.2 REGIONAL RETAL M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL M-2 HEAVY INDUSTRY . s 067 TarEM,,,R, as II= EX IT d 15 7 4,1.•."•■•■.. CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER a ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIGURE 11111111111111111110vorrpTimmli1111Tvirpoiriiiiiimiliiiiiillumpli1101111111111ilimatiiiiiiiipiliillililliliwIliiiiilicHplip111111111111111111 _ 11 MADE IN GERMANY 12 0 IS THS INCH 1 3 -- 5-- 6 7 •L— 9 10 THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENTIS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO 06 6Z Be LE 9Z GZ 47Z CZ ZZ .oTHE sUALITV OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTk 6 8 9 G 47 Z "0 111111111.1111111101111111111111111111111111111,1.11114111411,111111111-111111-1:1111111111111111111111111i1111 1111111171141111111111111'111114(11[111111101filliii511711 11411111-1.111-1111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 J 1 IL yinn;;ai Y I r C :FIRE IRE .. :' D ICT. 1 ANNXATIONSTUDY: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATIONS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH & ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIGURE 0 N II I S T R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I 11 1 1 lI94111 I I i I I 11111A 1J 111011114111111.1 IlI I I I I I 1 I I I I I IJ I I�I�I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1j11111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 0 1E7HS INCH 1 3 , 5 6 .7 W- $ 9 1 0 • 11 N/UEINOERMMlY 12 :IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS -CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT ISDUE TO .gTHE UALITY. OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILIilliiiiIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIJII ,IIIII.11llilllll IIIIrIIIIIIII I11I Ilii IIII nil IIII IIII Iliiliinlllii(Ilii �lill�llll II Ill l�llllillillniilil�iliilllllll of 6Z Be LZ 9Z SZ 17Z CZ) ZZ , L 6 e L. 9 S e a L WW p III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I 1 `.a 0.• �1 , Y. R,/'/.." P' pif";:'. S;:; wx} itiY. ,•.;.k::Y.c:.vY::::<`S!:SR'R`>v .. ) 7' 0 nr to in „r ”- KING CO_ UNTY, i 1 E , i ,30 '\ . , tt; f- --- 1 n'. .3. . • i 1 ST t 14 -4 II0 11111' 1111111' 1III �II111I111111111111 '1111111'!.i_ 101.1- 111111111inI�I�I�IIill FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Waste -Water Service Areas/ Waste -Water Facilities Legend IN111111I1+ paiaml STOF FM Seattle Sewer Service Val -Vue Sewer District Skyway Sewer District Septic Tank Service Septic Tank Over Flow Force Main CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH li ASSOC.,INC. STALZER & ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH L. y, l''YVffi(l,ln.3. ..:r. `.:::_.'., 1:... . I�_ 11 .l1_.1_�LI1I_LI 1 III 111 1 1111' 11 I� 111111 I_111),I I � I 1111111' 1111111 1111 1 11' 111 l 111' 11111111111 111' 11 1 11 0 1 2 3-; 4- _:, -.:--- .,.5_ -:._ . __. 6 _.. `_- - - -- 7,..;.;41,...........1_3_ -- 9 10 • 11 WWEINOERMAN' 12 le �! IF' THIS LMICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS :,CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT' IS-DUE TO Z ()THE 1UALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT. !6 8 L 9 S .V C Z 1 IIIIIIIIIIliiii IIIIIIIi iilIIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIiiil1111IIIIliiiiilIIIII1111IIIIIrllllllil Iii) no ini:liii Iii1 flu iii' iilllllllhii I� IIICiIiil�lii IJiI iill�llllfiffi�lili I�Illliiii iiii d'i '''hill llliiii.hl�llill�f I111I11JIIIo�II�JJ111111II�ILIIIJII11i1hIIIIInihif ilIIIIIIIIII FIGURE 18 oe 6Z Be LZ 9Z SZ +7Z Ca ZZ L I uiondtl 127 W s n. • 124 1:f. 113:. I:' S ‘—C ifl Q; %, I ^ °. fi ,fir • t \ Ili �I III I }, i I1 ::,' lul I' � j lI ''�a�lll I;IIII ' I'!J� 111'1 l 11117 ,p `d 1111111 11 I IIllI ���III111d� 1 1 ul I ARE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Water District Boundaries J.eeend 111111111111 City of Seattle Water District No. 125 Water District No. 25 No Designated Purveyor CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOC.,INC. STALZER 8 ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH FIGURE i9 I11111111111111111rr4��3 t.,.,v { ?..:..' ;......'_.- i I I I I I I �. 111111I111I111 I111I111I111I111 111111111. 11111111I1III�I1III�IIJI I I I- 1Ll1l1l. 111111_ hIII�IIJIII�III( I_ IL1LII1IIl1lll11111111 11i111111111111' 11111111111111) 1 1 1 1 1! 3 ". • 4 :. :.5::.._...._- ._ 6 8. 9 • 10 ' 11 "MINUIDAAW 12 0 16THS INCH 1 % `IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS I CLEAR THAN THIS. NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO OE 6z se Lz 9z 5z vz £z; zz tz ,OTHE IUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT . 16 e 9 S E z ` "" o I ll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111IIIIIII1111111IIIIIIIIII111111111 IIIIr11111111.1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 111111111111111111i iltlliglll�l� 11111illl1Ih1111111111111111111111111111111111111I 11Ii1111111IInI1IIIU111111IIn11111111111 u I ggESk LIECEIr rilaCrik "msr `3 :s53 . s :G J ru'lygy�y :.rf.? 4, 0 7 O $ 12Y , I . — / i ! ri � 5 i 11i t t. ,KING COUNTY. t} 11111111. 111ilillill1IIII111 1111111111.111111111jl11r111 1,1111- 1I 1111i111j1 M11111 0 ISTHS INCH 1 3-, 0e 6Z . Be LZ • 9Z SZ • 4Z CZ ZZ lZ 111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111111111I11II1IIIlll1IIIHllllllll ifi Mlr4111 FIRE DISTRICT *1 ANNEXATION STUDY Water System Facilities 1.egend 10" /SEA SEA TUK 125 25 Pipe Size/Service Provider Seattle Tukwila Water District No. 125 Water District No. 25 Supply Meter Pressure Reducing Valve City of Seattle Cedar River Pipelines CCA Inc HUGH G. GOLDSMITH 8 ASSOC.,INC. STALZER 8 ASSOCIATES TDA INC. NORTH 12_11 1 111111.1.111111_1il1I I_I_I IJ I I I LI l LI l I lI i 111111I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Q. 9 10 • • �IF THIS•MICROFILMED•DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE,'IT IS :DUE TO THE sUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 6 8 L 9 S 17 C Z 1WW0 1111 IIII 1111 111111111II1111111111 IIIhIIIILIIIIIIII II'1I111111I111111111IIIIllllll IIII IIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII LIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII��I�LIJ11.II1111(�� I�JIIIJII IIIIIIII�III�,IIIIII IIIIIIIII� 11 NAOEIHSERK" 12 FIGURE 20 2 I : \ X1'41 410I Ur' -' loin. 0011 �Aiwa, Vim molt 4.6.1111 mia ito KMAV Porti ormaida��r: : 1.. mF 81 -1 'R,'i)1 R Soulhcenter Rem. :I3e,uO,1 fill 1 31 IrofIr IIS Obrlen 111OIILINE COMMUNITY • COLLCOF. f Jarnetnr 1111 ilgygilqyqilqyiplip 1911111119 D »,.,m.. 1 9 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11••x^ 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS ole oulnu lo u6m lm dmd ulnu lmduuu liiolun ihni lzw duu z lu iiGm I iniGOiu Cnu LH oid_ilQTEAR ii UuTAn LAN T Y THOF S TH TOCREIG INT A L IS ODM ETN9 k _I I I I I I I I — iniduuhnilnuf ulmi hndni liiiduuhmliiiTluuluu im6m uulim milmi mduu imhm mdnu nu6ui mi6m nu6ml • 33 z\ Gov't. Lot 13 27.34 Acres Kin' \/ ,T,24 n* 1 NORTH Or crw. CK or 5 ROSE . Erra) A \ N\ i ♦ N N .P. / /�\t \ F° \ c'f \ 9y Z0• \ f N ,\ \ \ \ N \N \ \\ r 0 1 ■ mw $1 -I- A 410 r. Jvr •x PP kI5 } t�t.��'r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII (IIIIIII_IP IIIIIIII1I11 III FIJI 0 16T/16 INCH 1 2 3 , } -.— . 1.1.1111111 11111111111 I I IJ I I 1 1111 1111 11111111111 11 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 6 7 `.... ._.._ 8. 9 • 10 11 14ADE1HO[IIMMIT 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT. IS• LESS ll CLEAR THAN THIS.NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO W OE ez e� cz 9z sz ryz ez; -zz z I.flTHE SUALITY OF THE'ORIGINAL DOCUMENT , e e L 9 s v e z t WW 0 . 11, 11111�IIu11Ii1i1In11I1111I1nII111I11uI1n111 J1J11i11I1u1I1111I1J�ilI�11I IIIIL111111 M O M 1111 M 1111 M 1111 (1n 1111 1111 tin �1ii i ii iii nn rm �i1i 1�iI 1111 1111 1111 n1i111n11�11111u1111111111h111111n111111111111u1�111111111111uh1111111111u1111111u111 • t�. � �.'l. c�Y TiiT - y` • i. ..ri• ,.KS xJ. r f a J t ., •... ... a. ♦ .- ?r N, 1 ,•.�,! .5 .<„ t.,. t�i;:a � .:t� rr }?:Fys ��{: _.r..r..r:... .xf�Y.:x ,,,n .. :Asr...1�:'�. -r �. .z• ?.,sk °r�mz.. 4 1 : -. • "41' '1 :17 .,•C'■•• or 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111110111.1_111-111111111111111111J111 I I I ' • 0 16 TH11 INCH 1 2 O1 • E 68 84 LZ 9Z GE hi EZ.I 88 • • • • 11111111111iilb1111111111111111 ' '' .': '1 ; :: itt• I-011111[1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 (1111611 1 11111 ;1111 q1 i 1 - 6 --- 9 10 • 11 MADEMEWRY 12 CLEAR THAN THIS:NOTICE, IT IS•-DUE TO IF THIS •MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS • • THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 41, "4" Q. • - - 1 3401 H16 0, • 17.4 E WW ••/ .. % N%., ) ki L. e 43 • *s. • k --.07—q - ti ..: ' 03 ... ...., . L.,,..... 7/7-77515 —77477Proci sn'iitrstal v SS AVM 00 \GIe` co. 4. • • ••+, • .C". • 4..4 ,41,! ..45,` A At'l• o'-N44.4?!'fA'•• •.t 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111r11111111-1 1111 1111 1.1111111111 I I .1 141_11111.1.11111.1111 I ___1.1111111111111111.111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 10 TAM INCH 1 . 6 7 8 9 10 • 11 'ADEN otRuANY 12 • El c. • AP ' /.7. 97 CZ 177 E71 •ZZ IF' THIS MICROFILMED., DOCUMENT IS LESS .\ 'CLEAR THAMTHIS'NOTICE, ITAS—DUE TO TUt-:7A1161-TTV-11C-TLIC.-ADTC.Th1111'..'nnrtimomr • • 6 -8 L - 9 • 9 • E • -xl�•r S• � • _ I Ilr¢. ff.�L (rnU f ff6f fn in7 r M 9 �n e '��',y/� i,l.. Aes lIIH Low Fns I • s "i7a�sI.,, call I I�f.� I+we� any BNasb " ,..,�m �n�Sm•f� a4G 3731 Or/ , S AT L' A-OE R Ci ZONING MAP "ZONING FOR PARK /CROISSANT ANNEX 5/4/87 7FNINO FOR RENTOX/Tllj(WILA BOUNDARY AN 7.FNINa F•R P R . RI 470 1/2•/B8 STRANDER ANNEXATION 11/29/88 BOUNDARY.LINE ADJUSTMENT 11/29/89 BOUNDARYILINE ADJUSTMENT .5pN S.,/OA=T FILE NUMBER FILE NUMEER C.i.Nngjyi }:MLw41:1tN}: 11111 111111111 11111111 1111'11111 1 111111111111 11111111111111111 IIII 11111111111i1�11111} 111111111111111111111111 111111lIll11ll1 19111111 111111'1' 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 0 .'" ' 1 7 3' .4.. ,... . '�........ 6 .. 7 y B 9 • 10 .. , 11 ....e•.�, 12 IF.THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR.THAN..THIS.NOTICE. IT,.IS DUE TO . , • THE. QUALITY OF •THE QA A INAL,DOCUMEN_ , ..a.,' i , i .; . I... i 1"7-;-17 o ` pg Er Bid 7 .7 PLATE VI-1 RECOMMENDED SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES 11111' 111' 1111111'11l11111 11111111 11111111 11l1111h111111141- 11IIIIII11111 0 1e TNn INCH 1 2 3_� Q£ 6Z 8G LZ 9Z SZ 4Z CZ ZZ URI Morton Dennis & Associates, Inc. J.I.LI11111111 111I(IjIf I11 J 1p_ I IIJ111111 I11i111'1 11 1111111111111111'111I11I11 111111 11111 _6.._..._..._._.7._..__ 8, 9 10 • 11 IMMMANY12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT :IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO ++ THE sUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1III�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII11111111 I�1111111�I1111111 III111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIr111111 IIII IIi uu 1111 1111 1111 Inl 111111 IIIIt111�1I11IIIIIlIl111f11 IIII rniDill Illilillllllll td; '¢i �t S ! qw.. Lt 7.�.... : 'R,• 5. : � t � t rt' c y v i 3 irl vi t7 hrr xtr ..,. �:.. � :�: .. .. _t ,r_r :, .,. .. ti. u•.; ... .�.. ». .. r. .::,.. _.. �.,' ,.t. ., ..._� .�.�.. '�3.�F.r6 .., ri., .... ,., ail ;f, ,!;n_ 6 8 ' L 9S h E Z L Nw 0 1111 II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I I I I I I II I I I II I I I II I____ ____ II I I I II I I I II I I I ' • GARDEN " MPRINIFIEIL • I n C o n t \a' I. Lo114 00 Acros 4 NN N N , \ N N. N N . e.N No N N • N N \•. 4- N\ N\ 0 SEATTLE 061Ift frit. -Mx 114 •1411, t1141114BN ,4'411^ roffilthiligEn EYEY MAME 41ti 011 Gov't. Lot 13 27.34 Acres ; ov, !iiiglitqdtk, " 7.-7r(071% OP7ITRIFIPL ••••■••.. Playground 1111111CONA — 111111011,ME MEMONN 1116,\.: IENSMIC Migliebehd# NINNMERRI 311111,111MN MUM NM 1 SCHOOL MERVE-1,== SEATTLE irENLINIBAR \ \ 1 n:T-fbeNGAN==n1-.' fw \ \ \ t=\ \ \ \ \ 1111111Wriii`'57. . .. \ . „ illfilliill ,,. ,,,,,, __',:. •. „ . '..,---,, .. \ \ . , , \I\ ,\:474\ \ ■-■ \ ,, .:"--,,7 i . le , , 4 q . 1{ 'It4T'i'L I.=" 1 A s• ■ 1 ...., ',.,. \ \ 1 ". trA ‘ 1-- 1,4 . L! \ tj, ,,, \ \ • I 3' \ 1:.;. \ '' m,. \ . E : \ 1. ' i \ \ HIuIm tt,, \ * r r„, CORRONITF—L/AUT ' \ \ tal \ \ ':, ')%i \ \ ' \ 3. .\ \ 0004 \\s S. 93RD Si3. 93RD ST \ • , \ U.. \ \ 0) I Q 'r '7 \ \ FIRE DISTR6 # 4.•.• ......... s ko ... rTIV = TRACT 4 °El 0 1=1 C9 4. 4e °TRACT 2 \ 0 & . 0 0 1 1 El 74511C • .#A1.1•-; 0 (0) .F I el, OP OP/ PIPPRIVIN1 LI sr., ovc 114 0. • 96114 ST. ST 1 KM MA, INAPO ;1P7 0 3 900 • • r ,0,1-10.rar'r 1,11111111111111111,111,111111111111111,11111111111M1111111.1111P1M11111111111111111111111111111111111111111W111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 -4 - 5,. 5 7 % 8 9 10 11 ••••■•■•• 12 • ‘ , \ IF. THIS ICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS OUE TO oe •• •, ‘• •• •• •• ••, •• I• II - UALI 4 0 f • 0 IAI. •OCUMEN • • , • • • • • • 1 -c, 1 ,....,,,,11,,,,,,A....„1-1-41S4,112.,,vi in miiiilailai li141,...,....444„.4zr .,,,.,116 , I, Odd, 'I, I HI,' il ii i i ilifinhiluulvd,„,,,ir,„,..,..l. ...., . , ..;i:4 . '-4'. -ad-0-!—.0.1 — .__ ._,..,,,.____, 4.•.• ......... s ko ... rTIV = TRACT 4 °El 0 1=1 C9 4. 4e °TRACT 2 \ 0 & . 0 0 1 1 El 74511C • .#A1.1•-; 0 (0) .F I el, OP OP/ PIPPRIVIN1 LI sr., ovc 114 0. • 96114 ST. ST 1 KM MA, INAPO ;1P7 0 3 900 • • r ,0,1-10.rar'r 1,11111111111111111,111,111111111111111,11111111111M1111111.1111P1M11111111111111111111111111111111111111111W111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 3 -4 - 5,. 5 7 % 8 9 10 11 ••••■•■•• 12 • ‘ , \ IF. THIS ICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS OUE TO oe •• •, ‘• •• •• •• ••, •• I• II - UALI 4 0 f • 0 IAI. •OCUMEN • • , • • • • • • 1 -c, 1 ,....,,,,11,,,,,,A....„1-1-41S4,112.,,vi in miiiilailai li141,...,....444„.4zr .,,,.,116 , I, Odd, 'I, I HI,' il ii i i ilifinhiluulvd,„,,,ir,„,..,..l. ...., . , ..;i:4 . '-4'. • __ .:i V. , r .q4) , _I �' 'l V ^S ictt g , ,off\ �a *p 3! t 0 re t ti ' •e� • v• ^ Al' 00 '3 a� /d \p01L • 441: :0:4 • a.ot o 1 ; ��1\ cs . 1 614;146.- a v • . ,/ ti ,o9 y.- •. 20 ��x80° _ \• 1. « %z .441 I • -- - @�. •'AC. �+f'b �1i1 G •b � � !s /brig . 1�) i. 1' 1663 4. • '� • 1 t Y (ID ''4 `4 -2'�8 t.. 't':C Y 4-3 1 • 49 :48 t 147 .;I .46 W.. Q, lc} .7.Y • in 11 • ;7.4�L • , •° ' 11 " ✓ r ▪ 4 N 'r t f.� .' rllH ✓` tj� .34 ;n 1�c�riL�lf :: •J� j... rC •� .l 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111h111111 -111-11111111111_ -__1I 11I�IIII1 I L- 11� -.1 1 �- lill111�11��I1�1111 i ��1111iIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111111111111 0 16TH"INCH 1 2 3- _.4.., -- .5.._.-.... _. -.... _.6..- . - ...... i _....8, 9 • 10 • 11 •DEiHEEEWWY 12 IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS\ C IP LEAR THAN'THIS;NOTICE, IT IS-DUE TO 0 E 6IZ 86 LI 9IZ SII 7Z EIZ1 Z_�Z_ LZ THE "QUALITY 'OF "THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT '` ° 8 9 s E ?.. .WW 0. OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE ottt1 stle-411/414DCg. OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE ..,..■■■••••••■•■■•••• No.228-00, HASTINGS, — LOS ANGELES — LOGAN, OH. — McGREGOR, TX. — LOCUST GROVE, GA. U.S.A ' ; T 77'777' 777's 17; : ^,777:777^ 7r 771 '1. COMP PLAN AMENDMENT 1987 DATE FILE NUMBER PROJECT NAME ADDRESS APPLICANT ILE CROSS F REFERENCE ACTION 3/10/87 87 -1 -CPA • METRO PARK & RIDE INTERURBAN AVENUE S. & 52ND AVENUE S, CITY OF TUKWILA 87 -3 -R EPIC -6 -87 6/12/87 87 -2 -CPA CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT SIDEWALK PLAN (CBD) ,- CITY -WIDE CITY OF TUKWILA 87 -7 -R . EPIC -12 -87 ADOPTED ORD. #1516 7/7/87 87 -3 -CPA FLOOD CONTROL ORDINANCE CITY OF TUKWILA CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS EPIC -14 -87 11/17/87 87 -4 -CPA STRANDER 13530 - 53RD AVENUE S. STRANDER 87 -5 -R- *: �� �:'Jr, rfi." `-' ,, .'G•i.`s4.':9..Y`t ";ir,,- .,'a-r,:y` OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT gigiOw. 1.7e444(14 Ri RIP Lie 4. DATE OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE • 01 re Q No. 225. 0G HASTINGS, MN. — LOSANGELES— LOGAN, OH. — MCGfEGOR , TX. —LOCUST GROVE, GA. U.S.A .I OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE OUT TO FILE NUMBER OR NAME OUT DATE 1111 .. mefiiG © No. 225 -OG HASTINGS, MN. — LOS ANGELES — LOGAN, OH. — McGREGOR, TX. — LOCUST GROVE, GA. U.S.A Illl f . =- rJ-■-,"4>m-- m—a --'7T, Win^^., - :�m-u,nr'