HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 85-08-V - MANAGEMENT INVESTORS - SETBACK VARIANCE85-08-v 85-8-V
15660 west valley highway south 158th street
MANAGEMENT INVESTORS SETBACK VARIANCE
T908
•
April 5, 1985
John Goodman
Management Investors, Inc.
15660 West Valley Road
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mr. Goodman:
This letter is formal notification that on Thursday, April 4, 1985, the Board of
Adjustment approved your request for variances to TMC 18.50 and 18.52 subject to
the condition of a revised site plan showing the suggestions made by Mr. Keyes
at the Public Hearing.
The action of the Board of Adjustment in granting the application is final unless
within ten days from April 4, an aggreived party makes an application to the
Superior Court of King County for a writ of certiorari, a writ of prohibition or
a writ of mandamus.
Please submit your revised site plans for review,as soon as possible.
If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
14 0.6j44 - Raig/war ----
Moira Carr Bradshaw
Assistant Planner
MCB:ks
, o;.v.o.r +..i5At i1 r S t•.N'T A VAI C 2
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433.1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
433-1800
Gary L VanDusen, Mayor
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of the April 4, 1985, Board of Adjustment meeting.
Chairman Goe opened the public meeting at 8:03 p.m. Other Board members
present were Rick Beeler, Moira Carr Bradshaw, and Becky Kent, Planning
Department.
MS. WHEELER MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 13, 1984, BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT MEETING. MS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED.
r
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO POSTPONE CITY COUNCIL ACTION UNTIL AFTER THE PUBLIC
HEARINGS. MS. WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
PUBLIC HEARING
A. 85 -07 -V: Litho Development, requesting a variance from
landscaping requirements of TMC 18.52.020.
Ms. Carr Bradshaw summarized the staff report.
The Board asked staff about landscaping and parking on the site. Ms. Carr
Bradshaw identified areas on an overhead.
Chairman Goe opened the public hearing at 8:24 p.m.
Lance Mueller, 130 Lakeside, Seattle, WA 98122, representing the appli-
cant, described the reasons for the parking layout.
Chairman Goe asked what type of business Litho Development was. Mr.
Mueller described it as being retail with no manufacturing.
Chairman Goe asked about truck maneuverability on the site, contents of the
building and type of landscaping to be used on the west side of the pro-
perty.
SETBACK VARIANCE
Board of Adjustment
April 4, 1985
Mr. Mueller indicated access will be off Strander Boulevard, the contents
of the building would include printing equipment and suggested an evergreen
type hedge would be used.
John Cody, Litho Development, described the use of the building as pri-
marily retail with no manufacturing and felt there would not be a parking
problem.
Chairman Goe closed the public hearing at 8:42 p.m.
Chairman Goe asked if fire access is adequate. Mr. Beeler said the Fire
Department would have to review and approve that prior to issuance of the
building permit.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(1). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(2). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(3). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(4). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(5). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUEST. MS. WHEELER SECONDED THE
MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
B. 85 -08 -V: Management Investors, Inc., requesting variance from
setback requirements of TMC 18.50, landscaping requirements of TMC
18.52.020, and parking requirements of TMC 18.56.
Ms. Carr summarized the staff report.
..,.. ,... -... re. :.:. :uz.fi:r,!'f.:rl. ".:i: -.. ., ';^:1i,:"i.`. ., .... .. "•rs
Chairman Goe asked staff how much setback would be decreased. Ms. Carr
Bradshaw indicated about half the setback would be eliminated.
Chairman Goe opened the public hearing at 9 :05 p.m.
John R. Keyes, 15438 West Valley Highway, representing the owner, explained
there was not sufficient support in the existing building to support a
second floor, therefore, requiring columns. He said the pavement on S.
158th would remain and he described the planting plan for the site.
The agenda was changed t delete the request for parking variance on this
application as it does meet the parking requirements of TMC 18.56.
Page 3
Board of Adjustment
April 4, 1985
Ms. Altemayer inquired as to why the structural supports couldn /t be put on
the inside of the building. Mr. Keyes indicated that it would not be
feasible becauser the building would have to close down at time of.
construction.
Chairman Goe closed the public hearing at 9:30 p.m.
The board discussed the depth of the greenbelt along West Valley Highway,
the setbacks, and future expansion of SR 181 and how it will affect the
subject property.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(1). MS.
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. WHEELER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC 18.72.020(2). MS.
ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC
WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. WHEELER MOVED TO ACCEPT VARIANCE CRITERIA TMC
ALTMAYER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. WHEELER MOVED TO GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE LANDSCAPING
PLAN BEING APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. MS. ALTMAYER SECONDED THE
MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
Chairman Goe recessed the meeting at 9:55 p.m.
Chairman Goe reconvened the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
18.72.020(3).
MS.
18.72.020(4). MS.
18.72.020(5). MS.
C. 85 -12 -V: Northwest Volvo White Truck Center, requesting variance
from TMC 19.32.140
Mr. Beeler summarized the Staff report.
The Board discussed access and distance to the site, and visability.
David Weldy, applicant, explained the limited visibility of the wall -
mounted sign existing on the building, said the purpose of the larger
freestanding sign is because of the obstructions from the road way.
Ms. Altmayer asked what the objection to not building the sign within the
code. Mr. Weldy explained that the manufacturer doesn't make the sign that
meets the sign code.
Page 4
Board of Adjustment ,,
April 4, 1985
....,,... ... ..
.-
Mr. Weldy withdrew the variance application.
Chairman Goe closed public hearing at 11 :00 p.m.
William Kline, Meyer Sign Co., 512 Minor Avenue, Seattle, WA explained that
the sign manufacturer sets the size of the sign and this is the smallest
sign they produce.
Chairman Goe declared this item void as a result of Mr. Weldy withdrawing
his variance request.
CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS
Mr. Beeler reported on.the status of the Metro Effluent Transfer System,
the hiring of a permanent full time inspector, advertisement for an
Associate Planner position, Tukwila Pond Site, Capital Improvement Program,
Urban Form Study, and a possible Long Range Traffic Study.
OTHER BUSINESS
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO CHANGE THE STARTING TIME OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING TO 7:00 P.M. MS. WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED
UNANIMOUSLY.
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO EXCUSE MS. REGEL AND MS. HARRIS FROM THE MEETING.
MS. WHEELER SECONDED THE MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
ADJOURNMENT
MS. ALTMAYER MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. MS. WHEELER SECONDED THE
MOTION, WHICH PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
TUKWIL
Beeler
Secretary
BLK
F ADJUSTMENT
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT'
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM IV)B Management Investors
Introduction
Management Investors, Inc. is requesting variances from TMC (Tukwila Municipal
Code) 18.50.020 Setback Regulations and 18.52.020 Landscaping Requirements to permit
the addition of a second story to their existing building.
Findings
1. The applicant is proposing to add a second story to the Goodman Building which
is located at the corner of West Valley Highway South and South 158th Street.
The property is located in an M -1 Light Industrial District. The existing
building has 4222 square feet of office space and is nonconforming in regards to
setback and landscaping on both street frontages.
The proposed second story addition of 4792 square feet will expand the footprint
of the building by 1 foot on the east side and the south (S. 158th Street) and
by 2 feet on the north side and the west (West Valley Highway).
Sufficient parking exists for the proposed office expansion. The expansion
complies with building height requirements of TMC 18.50.020.
2. Per TMC 18.50.070(4), "In the case of corner lots, a front yard of the required
depth shall be provided (25 feet)...and a second front yard of half the depth
required generally for front yards in the district shall be provided on the
other frontage (12.5 feet)." (Parentheses added).
Since the narrowest width of the lot is generally considered the front yard,
a building setback of 25 feet is required along the West Valley Highway. The
Second front yard setback of 12.5 feet would be along S. 158th Street. The
applicant is proposing a 3 foot front yard setback along West Valley Highway
and a 5 foot front yard setback along S. 158th Street. Therefore variances of
22 feet and 7.5 feet are required and requested respectively.
3. Per TMC 18.52.020 (Landscape Requirements), landscaping shall be a minimum of
15 feet along both streets. Unlike building setback requirements, TMC
18.50.020 does not provide for the one -half landscape setback along the
"second front yard." Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 15 foot variance
along West Valley Highway and S. 158th Street.
Management Investors
Page Two
Conclusions
Variance Criteria TMC 18.72.020
1) "The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in the
zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed is
located."
4. The existing building was constructed in 1968, and at that time, front and side
yard setbacks were not required. Buildings were approved provided the distance
from the center line of the street to the building was not less than thirty
feet for normal service streets and 40 feet for designated arterial streets.
5. The applicant must bear the final responsibility of substantiating that conditions
exist which comply with the Variance Criteria listed in TMC 18.72.020.
Because of the few commercial structures in the area, a comparison with the
proposal is difficult. A visual survey of the area, while not precise, revealed
the following information. The northerly adjacent building does not appear to meet
the requirements of the code in regards to current landscaping and building setbacks.
The easterly adjacent structure, Boone Paints , appears to have met the front yard
landscaping and building setback requirements, but not the second front yard & landscaping
requirements. The southerly structure across S. 158th Street meets the setback
requirements but not the landscaping requirements.
In granting the requested variance, the Board would be allowing the applicant
to increase the height of his structure while not significantly increasing the
degree of nonconformance. In addition, a variance would not appear to be inconsis-
tent with the setbacks of other properties in the area.
2) "The variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to the size,
shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property in order to
provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in the
vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located."
The proposed building expansion is restricted by the size of the lot (100 ft x 153 ft)
and the existing nonconforming location of the building. Two adjacent buildings on the
north and east property lines and the two abutting rights -of -way prevent expansion in
conformance with existing setback requirements. Therefore, the only alternative is to
add a second story.
Granting the variances would provide the applicant with a privilege permitted in
the vicinity and zone and is necessary due to the special circumstances regarding its
size, location and surrounding uses.
'. �;; .
.
Management Investors
Page Three
Exhibits:
A. Site Plan
B. Building Elevations
C. Variance Application
D. Master Land Use Application
The granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and in the
zone in which the subject property is situated."
Due to the current lack of landscaping and the proposed small 1 and 2 foot
expansions around the perimeter of the building, granting a variance would not appear
to cause detriment to the public welfare or injure property or improvements in the area.
4) "The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implementation
of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan."
In addition to the proposal, the planned expansion of West Valley Highway to seven
lanes and the possible expansion of S. 158th Street, will decrease the amount of
landscaping and building setback areas along these streets. The cumulative visual
impact, therefore, will be a decline in the quality of the visual environment and
diminishment of open space on the subject property. Thereques;ted variances however will
not appreciably affect the Comprehensive Plan.
5) "The granting of such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the owners of other
properties in the same zone or vicinity."
The granting of the requested variances is necessary for the applicant to expand
the existing building in a manner which is available to other property owners in the
area.
Recommendation
Based upon the above, staff recommends the variances be approved.
/1r ,LLITT
I-
I
x
w
41;.;
0,1
L`1r�ai ��+ 111 • 4 .
2
Q
a.
0
0!
W
}
W
H
Nur
LEGAL
T1.T rt1111a4 a1 4$..., M••OS• A...-TV. el . ••• 14 •(4t•.•4 f• T- MI ►•I/ •• 5.44$ Pt.. W M.
*rf se tassel. )V•, O(•tfS•OM IfLLSW? •a•1111rf AT T. •4nIP••erNr a► T1•a ra••• Me•f14
1 • Net. IT. •• •T r W EWA.I, W1'4 Tl• •••Te•l* .1•15,4 •■ •at/.4•••• *T•Tt 11.Y •4 1w••T
•••• •" •.) • • e •T H••; nt• ••• ••1- sort 4 V. Wel . VI . .•T NP ►•,
� t+ Tb ►• - et re v • w • a
.. u.
t .. Ira •• a••Taf. •••••••••..0 T ►•a•
M 1.5.5 N
TN' M••rW1') , • L 3. 07••1• •O a. M.. IS Ta • Tro r a• T.la •a•111.1W.
a.
uat
•
•
•
If HST% *Toss* (l -•r••••1
►
r _. agora! ...now. w 1M O n-sa -,
du
••1ss.•• a•r•••T
17044
-I
••••.••••••••••■•
Rawer', ti1x.- 121J 00 PT. M•1 LT. WDtIS -1
L1E1V (•f7 /POSED ••YO Pia•.•w AVOrTtu . 4192 M•1 l7.
- i r - - -1 '� --
U ,'..
5 11 PLAN - 1 +�•"
•
GOODMAN BUILDING
•
0
J
f rt
-•• r
a
t
1-
4
4
•
ADDITION
1
•
1 _ 3 7
5 7
2
7 .6
4
C d S
-
LL) a
a 4
t
L %15
g ■ ad
x
U
2
4
a
0
U
In
UI
UI
a
-4
N 1:1 r
0
MI&
.0•••••••1
'Mum FOT
p•41•14 TYPILL•1.
•••
.7'• • • p s! r::41: •.•
0
E LEVATIG2k1
•••
9
.7]
E A41" E LEVAT I /J1.1
8
0
00 0
C -
0
0
r
rft •••
0
1=1 Li I
:t
0
1 Waldo, 1•111•11.4i••
r:1
•
S. ,
A5 Ti/2J E LEVANT ON
9
CO=
\\./ E 'S E L VAT 1,2 1.1
La
I—
co
I
x
CITY OF TURLINILA
Central Permit System
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION F
1) TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE (TMC) SECT
MEM •
IMAR 7 198
CITY 0f TUIwll q
rtsPNBV4NNW3qUENt U AR
S C H E D U L E
LAND USE VARIANCE
REQUESTING VARIANCE:
2) DESCRIBE THE VARIANCE ACTION WHICH YOU ARE REQUESTING: ALLOW 2' -0" ENCROACHMENT
ON SOUTH SFTRACK AREA.
3) DESCRIBE THE PRESENT USE OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY IF THE
VARIANCE IS APPROVED: SINGLE -LEVEL OFFICE PRESENTLY; SECOND LEVEL TO BE
ADOFn.
USE TO REMAIN SAME.
DESCRIBE THE MANNER IN WHICH YOU BELIEVE THAT YOUR REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE SATISFIES EACH
OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN TMC 18.72.020 (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF-
NECESSARY).
1) THE VARIANCE SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE A GRANT OF SPECIAL PRIVILEGE INCONSISTENT WITH THE
LIMITATION UPON USES OF OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH THE
PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF WHICH THE APPLICATION WAS FILED IS LOCATED.
RESPONSE: SITE VARIANCE IMPACTS ONLY THE SETBACK FROM A CITY STREET,
OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS ARE NOT DIRECTLY AFFECTED.
2 ) THE VARIANCE IS NECESSARY BECAUSE OF SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO THE SIZE, SHAPE,
TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION OR SURROUNDING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE IT
WITH USE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES PERMITTED TO OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY AND IN
THE ZONE IN WHICH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED
RESPONSE: DUE TO STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS, SECOND LEVEL MUST BE SUPPORTED
'ON FXTFRTOR OF FXTSTTNG Rl1TI'MNG.
3) THE OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL. NOT BE MATERIALLY DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC WELFARE
OR INJURIOUS TO THE PROPERTY OR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY AND IN THE ZONE IN WHICH
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED.
RESPONSE: THE EXISTING SETBACK AREA IS NOW USED FOR LONGACRES PEDESTRIAN
TRAFFIC. REQUESTED ENCROACHMENT WILL NOT MATERIALLY AFFECT THIS USE.
4 ) THE AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH VARIANCE WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE POLICY PLAN.
RESPONSE: PROPERTY DESIGNATED LT. INDUSTRIAL. LAND USE TO REMAIN SAME.
5 ) THE GRANTING OF SUCH VARIANCE IS NECESSARY FOR THE PRESERVATION AND ENJOYMENT OF A
SUBSTANTIAL.PROPERTY RIGHT OF THE APPLICANT POSSESSED BY THE OWNERS OF OTHER PROPERTIES
IN THE SAME ZONE OR VICINITY.
RESPONSE: DUE TO APPLICANT'S BUSINESS EXPANSION AND MAINTAINING VALUE OF
LOCATION, ADDITIONAL FLOOR SPACE IS REQUIRED, THEREBY NECESSITATING
ENCROACHMENT ONTO SOUTH SETBACK AREA. EXHIBIT C
TMC.18..72:070 PROH I B I TED V - AN NO I RC STANCES SHALL THE BOARD OF' ADJUST -
•MENT GRANT A VAR I ANCE • TO PERM T A U G t LL. :OR CONDI T I ONALLY . PERM 1 TTED • ,1,N THE
ZONE INVOLVED; OR ANY. USE EXP ESS Y S'R BY IMPLI T • PROHI13I TED •BY.THE, TERMS. OF THIS •
• TITLE IN SAID• ZONE .
A.a + 40 V'tV
CITY OF TUK • iLA
Central Permit System
MASTER LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
SECTION II :. PROJECT INFORMATION
SITE UTILIZATION:
SECTION !II: APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT
SUBSC!? I UEI? AND SWORN BEFORE ME
TN I S 7 DAY OF L-/ /
RESIDING AT i�/}164.79L(.
C CX GcJ
CITY OF TUKWILA
p DE
PLEASE WRITE LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL REQUESTED INFORMATION -- INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED FOR PROCESSING.
SECTION I: GENERAL DATA
TYPE OF O
BSIP APPLICATION: SHORT CI SUBDIVISION SHORELINE PRD PMUD: BAR
L] I' PLAT PERMIT L� L� 0 I NTERURBAN . OF
riCOMM PLAN
['CONDITIONAL QUNU R( VARIANCE C ZON 1 NG 6JAMENDMENT
1) APPLICANT NAME MANAGEMENT INVESTORS, INC. TELEPHONE ( 206) 235 -1171
ADDRESS 15660 W. VALLEY RD., TUKWILA, WA ZIP 98188
2) PROP. OWNER: NAME SAME TELEPHONE ( )
ADDRESS ZIP
3) PROJECT LOCAT I ON : (STREET ADDRESS, GEOGRAPHIC, LOT/ BLOCK) SAME
4 ) DESCRIBE BRIEFLY T H E PROJECT YOU PROPOSE. ADDITION • O F ,2ND LEVEL .TO E X I S T I N G
4000 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING.
5) ANT I C I PATED PERIOD OF CONSTRUCTION: FROM APRIL, 1985 To SEPT., 19 8 5
6 ) WILL PROJECT BE DEVELOPED .I N PHASES? OYES E3NO I F YES, DESCRIBE
PROJECT STATISTICS:
A) ACREAGE OF PROJECT SITE: NET .34 GROSS . 34 EASEMENTS N/A
B)' FLOORS OF CONSTRUCTION: TOTAL Ii FLOORS 2 INCLUDES: 0 BASEMENT 0 MEZZANINE
TOTAL GROSS 9 014 S /F INCLUDES : 0 BASEMENT D MEZZAN I NE
FLOOR AREA
EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES
ZONING DESIGNATION M -1 M -1
COMP. PLAN DESIGNATION LT. INDUST. L T. INDUST.
BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 4222 0 4 7 A 2 ❑
LANDSCAPE AREA 2276 ❑ 2276 ❑
PAVING AREA 12023 ❑ 11453 ❑
TOTAL PARKING STALLS:
- STANDARD S I Z E 23 28
- COMPACT SIZE -0- - 0-
- HANDICAPPED SIZE 1 2
TOTAL LOADING SPACES -0- - 0-
AVER. SLOPE OF PARKING AREA 1% 10
AVER. SLOPE OF SITE 1% 1%
IS THIS SITE DESIGNATED FOR SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ON THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL BASE
MAP? Q YES ra NO
1 , JOHN GOODMAN , BEING DULY SWORN, DECLARE THAT I AM THE
CONTRACT PURCHASER OR OWNER OF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IN THIS APPLICATION T H A T THE FORE-
GOING STATEMENTS AND ANSWERS HEREIN CONTAINED AND THE IN • -• TI • ' HE ; i•SUBMIT • ARE I N
ALL RESPECTS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWL1. / AND ELIEF
DATE 7-
19R�:
NOTARY. PUC3L 1 C I N -AND FOR THE /STATE OF WASHINGTON
E 0 CONTRACT PURCHASER OR
EXHIBIT D
- - ,
C
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Gary L. VanDusen, Mayor
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
TUKWILA BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Tukwila Board of Adjustment has fixed the
4th day of April, 1985, at 8:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers of Tukwila
City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, as the time and
place for:
• 85 -07 -V: Litho Development, requesting a_variance from landscaping require-
ments of TMC 18.52.020.
85 -08 =V: Management Investors, 'Inc . , requesting variance from setback
requirements of TMC 18.50, landscaping requirements of TMC 18.52.020, and
parking requirements of TMC 18.56.
85 -12 -V: Northwest Volvo White Truck Center, requesting variance from TMC
19.32.140. •
Any and all interested persons are invited to attend.
Published: Record Chronicle, March 24, 1985
Distribution: Mayor
City Clerk
Adjacent Property Owners
Fiel
site plan goodman building addition
• _ • • -• • • I
. • • .1. .
I
" '••••„,* •
.1430 DNINNYld
VIIMWIL 10 AM
S861 t, HVL
A VA%I&1 4 ITO
ft 1 h , V ( i l ASjPai!,:". _
Ijirra :$1,i x3 tart' 11 VI CS '011 - 1 A
41401 ^co Ov 40
. _
01.1212 “ei *VAN 1 A-141ndit , S'11131 fit
riled villa II4 Aarnttl ,
ISO
flip 35-.014
I?&b \NI t I'Uj
SIS3T
MNWIEMegi i tAttesTo
P r
t■ X XS !IMMO am NO. 10000 CLWAXPINNII
•
1 3.1=FrE.59-11LA-F. -to
/ L.-I
1,1" maygp.asjr,..-
- 1 1 =4 4 5=t4L-
445R.Ic.
4. F. 4F.e.VE.L.
r 1
cD
6.14. FiemE44446...
1=1'15=41-
I
FIL.
;
Fem. Pvc.
ivy
8
0 FIR
*F..c.rict*4 / L. • I
t-- I
t5c? is•M cc:A-Al./10 kl 1-144-1E- arri, eW_E- 15 5
I q.L.
3 c.,64-•
I &-.0
"o
'o
•
L.•
_91
,
G( AI I *CAL A(.
( F - 0 , 4 0 S ( _ g t - I I os) 00.6
e.i4c.L.154
rrPicAt. ALA Al - -
11
14.
0A.... II
' IWO •••• • • 11=0:-T-OfJOCIXIMME
II
(gort
.11
t:,
0
L
11
• L1_910 ,l
A
4,1
L.A.L.11.1
Pelf ets—(11-V
PANEVO
AUG 12 1985]
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPT.
• '44 , !itVk •?:4.14 • ' "
;
0 le TN, IN. 1 3 4. 5 6 7 \ 8 9 10 11 12
L CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LES1 11
0 € 6Z BC 12 9Z GE 7Z CZ: ZZ 1Z (q.111EAVALI T OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT 1. es e L. 9 S h C Z 0
JORIMIIALIA1111!).1i1410,141,61iii1141111410INkliailirCIPIE
' •i:.'"7:7
REVISIONS
BY
Date " 9•-sS
Scale h 0 A-14 , 141.1
Drawn 1504.41
Job 04:4 3
Shoot
L I
Sheets
vt■Atvived--vam'o" ,
I
,, •
• ,
• •
•
, • t , ■ •
• •
• , '• • •
, •
LIN
Qi
2
A
LEGAL L7eserzi T1/,U
C-
THAT p//IZTI //N nF HE.IRY M EA.DER D "UATI / /LI CLAIN 4 44 IIJ 5EGT1 -)04 24 T,.Avu.6 HIp •v3 1J, RAue E 4E„
111 KIUG d-9u JTY, \VA. 12E5c210EP A, F//LL//\Vr, : PDE41 AT THE IIJTER',EcTl /)U /)F THE NRTH MARC,W
AF 4 15811 ST. 44 IT 1.1/ EIISTS, \WITH THE EASTERLY 1/1AR4W nF 4EG / /1J rARY 4TATE. H \WY * - 2 (\VEST
VALLEY RD. 5) A5 IT N //\V ExI4•r TREucE. AL /)u4 SMP N//RTH I.1A(2411.1 Q. 87 °07' 22" EAST 150.0';
THE.uce. IQ, 2° 52' 38" \V, 144.0' ; TNEUGE 5 8 \V. 153.42' T/, THE SA1D EASTERLY MAV41u nF
THE SAID H144WAY; THENCE 5. o7 °4I' 3O" E. I/J//.35' T4 . THE. r/aENT /F THE F3EGINNI144,
ELF -V. o.o
1 L T, Co lIG,
i cur-0
1 /i
Ex 1$T'4
_ . 3N4LSRn
o 4
1
- ''' - • U - - = - - -- -- - - - - - --
.� ,. LINE- .7F 2.'410 euILPIIj4 -
c�uc. %vHE61..
-5 U/ 1581 5T REST (L.)14 4Ac(ZE5 \VAY)
_ _ EXIST. pE.De,TLIAN pLOI.I ARFA 1b REMAIN --..,
pRoPERT( LINE%
��XI��T. I3L bc 82221 scl,pT, M-I LT. II-IDU T:
IJ,E \V 1 x-917 / >5Er7 �IJn' FL��•�rr, . An l rp,-- 4 1-1`1 IrI.l
I ,
r `R6LOCl 7E t,Pt, 11G7fF.
1 r�
4T/ pS ` 2x157'4 (i iLLA¢r
I If
? I /
�ExIST.' AEPI4Aur
EXIST.
<2r
E.•1,7" L
SITE FLAK(
LAU75cAPINq IIJWALL ANTERS'.; ` B1
1 - s"
.IS��.1Z
p, /mss -r '
IJ IZvE_Y STA KE.'.
II n
t /
P 'I ELEC MGTFR
-U �-
Y�G
-
-1
LI, I-1DLI�T.
- O
GOODMAN BUILDING
I ql
0
I
8'
Imo' -o n
4_ . "r6 --4L it)
ExIStIN4 SIGN
Q ' 4os Slsd
ExiSTiN 4 L 4 v J
l
� e,"
J
4
ADDITION
II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'III'IIIIIII' IIII IIIII�III. IIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII �IIIl111JllJ1 .II.IIII.II.III.LII_.1IkI ( l_ I111Ii.I��IlI1I�lI. LII111IJIlIl1l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 'I
1 3 4, -.. 5 _... 6 .... 7.._ \ 8 9 • 10 • 11 ���.' 12
t IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT.IS LESS�
, CLEAR „THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS-DUE 'TO II
OE 6e Sd Le Se Se az " Ce ee Ci.THE UALITY OF THE'ORIGINAL • DOCUMENT 15• e c -9 S.:.a ..1.� ".p_..,_.
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllpp (III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1�1I tI
11115611i1115111111!11111155 Iili it IIIIOIIIII 11fil61Ii iulliii uii uiI uulludullluululllludlluluulullluuhulluululllluduu�ullllluluulliul ___.
G E N E R A L NOTES
1. ALL METHODS AND,IIATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE (1982 EDITION) AND REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF TUKWILA CODES.
2. DESIGN DATA:. '
ROOF LIVE LOAD 25 PSF SEISMIC ZONE 3
WIND LOAD 20 PSF ALLOW. SOIL BEARING 2000 PSF
UPPER LEVEL LIVE LOAD 60 PSF ZONING M -1
OCCUPANCY GROUP B2 (OWNER. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V -N
OCCUPIED)
3. FOUNDATION: ALL FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH, 1' -G"
MINIMUM BELOW FINAL SUBGRADE. BACKFILL TO BE THOROUGHLY .COMPACTED. •
PROVIDE (2) k4 REBAR CONTINUOUSLY AT BOTTOM OF ALL WALLS C ONE (1)
44 REBAR AT TOP OF WALL. .
4. CONCRETE: ALL CONCRETE FOR FOUNDATION FOOTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
28 -DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI. UNSUPERVISED CONCRETE FOR
ALL FLOOR SLABS;ON :GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
2500 PSI.
5. REINFORCING: ALL REINFORCING TO BE INTERMEDIATE GRADE DEFORMED BARS
ASTM 615 GRADE 40. .
CONCRETE COVE R.OF. REINFORCING:
FOUNDATION 3 "'
PILASTERS 1 -1/2 "' '
• LAP ALLS'REINFORCING'24 DIAMETERS
6. PROJECT ALL ANCHOR BOLTS 2" ABOVE CONCRETE.
7, ALL WELDING TO BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDERS (WABO). ,
8. FS- MISCELLANEOUS 'STEEL. =4,000 PSI: UNSUPERVISED.
9. FRAMING LUMBER SHALL BE 12. HEM FIR OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL 2!'
LUMBER SHALL BE KILN DRIED. (KD). EACH PIECE OF LUMBER SHALL BEAR STAMP
OF WEST COAST LUMBER INSPECTION BUREAU SHOWING GRADE MARK OR APPROVED '
EQUAL.
10. EACH SHEET OF PLYWOOD SHALL BEAR THE TRADEMARK OF THE AMERICAN PLYWOOD
ASSOCIATION;' ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO PS 1 -74. THICKNESS AND LAY -
UP ARE AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. ALL PLYWOOD SHALL BE C -D INTERIOR WITH
EXTERIOR GLUE OR AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SHOWN
OR NOTED, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM NAILING: PANEL EDGES COD AT
6" ON CENTER, INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT l0D AT 12" ON CENTER.
11. FRAMING CONNECTORS SHALL HAVE ICBO APPROVAL AND'•BE MANUFACTURED BY
P. H. BOWMAN CO., INC., SEATTLE,. WASHINGTON; SIMPSON CO., SAN LEANDRO, .
CALIFORNIA; OR APPROVED EQUAL. .
12. WOOD TRUSSES SHALL BE MANUFACTURED BY AN APPROVED TRUSS MANUFACTURER.
TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CARRY THE LOADS 4.ISTED IN THE DESIGN
CRITERIA AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOADS INDICATED ON FRAMING PLANS. SHOP.
DRAWINGS FOR THE COMPLETE TRUSS ASSEMBLY INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED
BRIDGING OR BLOCKING AND CONNECTIONS TO BEARING WALLS, BEAMS, ETC.,
SHALL BEAR THE STAMP OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LOCATED TO PRACTICE IN
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
13. TRUS- JOISTS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED ONLY IN A TRUS -JOIST CORPORATION
PLANT UNDER THE. DIRECTION OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
RESIDENT AT THE =PLANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS..' THE
ENTIRE TRUSS ASSEMBLY, 'INCLUDING BEARING CLIP, ANCHORING NAILS OR
LAGS,•AND BRIDGING CLIPS SHALL BE AS APPROVED-BY CURRENT ICBO "REPORT.
TRUS- JOISTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CARRY THE.'LOADS LISTED IN THE DESIGN
CRITERIA AND ANY ADDITIONAL LOADS INDICATED ON THE FRAMING PLAN. PRO-
VIDE SHOP AND INSTALLATION DRAWINGS PRODUCED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF
AND BEARING THE STAMP OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER REGISTERED AS. SUCH IN
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.. DETAIL DRAWINGS TO INDICATE TYPES, SIZE,
. SRAC!NG,' BRIDGING, 'CONNECTIONS, ANC ORING, BEARING PLATE AND OTHER
.PERTINENT DETAILS. •" -
14. EXTEND EXISTING CENTRAL - MONITORING FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM
TO NEW ADDITION,
¥flF 76.-01-V
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
GROSS BUILDING AREA 9022 S.F.
REQUIRED PARKING 1/400 S.F. = 22
PARKING SHOWN 22
IC FULL SILK
v coMPAGT
_IT - t:
5 L I c
DL',i'.1ATLU LI[,,aT
illpJ sr FiAl
� C 1 .G t 1)1 TY_ -M .P.
sit
I
0
L
'i a
II
No
i
•
LEC,AL . 17ESGRIpTIn1.1
r
THAT p Wri"N1 nF HENRY MEADER D CL4INI III 6EGTI'JN 24 TnIVN.HIF. 2 N•; RAN4E 4E., \V.M.
ILI IcIU4 C -OUI4r \VA• VEc¢13E12 AS FnLLn\VS : ,.I'E41UNI144 AT THE IUTERSEcTI' U nF THE HnRTH MARI,IIJ
AP 4 IWJNTH ST. AS IT Nn\v ExIfTS, WITH THE EASTERLY MARLIN np Sec ■JursARY 6TATE Hwy *2 (\VEST
V4.LLE`( RD, 5.) A5 IT Nn\V EXIST,; THENCE AL/H.14 SAID UngTH 1 N. 87 ° 07'22" EAST 150.0';
THENCE u, 2 52' 38" W. I ; THENCE 5n 81' 7'72" W. 153.42' TA THE SAID EASTERLY A•IAZ411.1 nF
THE. SAI( I.114H11/4Y; THENCE- 5. O7 "4I' 30" E. Inn.35' Tn THE. PNINT nF THE 13E4
2y
O
iD
01
N
-t-
., :EX S•r•'4
Ex15TIN4 CnVCIZETE.. KN
EEL
S \Y 158TH STREET (LnM4 AcIZE6 \vty)
f---- EXIST. pEbES•T1`'IA•IJ PL0I1 PKFATO REMAIN
• - T • _ 11.J
I CJ" ...__.I�o.c ...... .... .... _,_., _ .
--- w--= - - -►�- -- - - --u- - - - -
��xlsT• I3�b�,. '1222 aGZ,FT, M I LT, II�DLIST •
IJ E \V
rs•
E xli 1
0
12.0 r2 ? IJ p F A P D I T• 17 u
:CJE F i.T• 5LA6
X 11'4 6nLLAW
..7- NE \v
14'-6
.4 r 1.1 A L T
'113 \F U L L S I Z. E.
Eri ,T E =U-
F -c
L1
- 153,82 •
Eai`( 12IIDEA 5.9 A.-ps
S ITE FLAW
>La J CApII4c, l J 14M-L pLA{JT'EP
i
4 URvE`I'•..STAKE";
FELocnTE cAS N�'fF�
K 1 1J e
:..LIME op EXIsTlu4., rbuILDIM S.
, 1.1 -I4 11-1 .I-I, NDI.1' -T,
911 n
E'I T. F_LF.G METFA
0
0
-I
9'4
lP
11_
- IT
G• I,
0
0
.114 !4•s
•
exlsnld4 s1Gu l •
0. NIG x8
EXISTI0.14 LAWS)
1 2'. o
6. PROJECT ALL ANCHOR BOLTS 2" ABOVE CONCRETE.
'7. ALL WELDING TO,BE PERFORMED BY CERTIFIED WELDERS (WABO). .
' 8. FS- MISCELLANEOUS STEEL= 24,000 PS1'.UNSUPERVISED.
9, FRAMING. LUMBER SHALL.BE'02:HEM FIR OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. ALL
LUMBER SHALL BE KILN DRIED' (KD). EACH PIECE,OF LUMBER•SHALL BEAR 'STAMP
OF LUMBER INSPECTION BUREAU SHOWING. GRADE MARK OR APPROVED
EQUAL..
• 10. EACH SHEET OF PLYWOOD SHALL TRADEMARK OF THE 'AMERICAN'PLYWOOD
ASSOCIATION; .ALLGRADING "SHALL.CONFORM TO PS 1 -74. .THICKNESS AND LAY
.UP ARE AS SHOWN ON DRAWINGS. ALL PLYWOOD SHALL BE C -D INTERIOR WITH
EXTERIOR GLUE OR AS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.• EXCEPT•AS OTHERWISE SHOWN
OR NOTED, PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING'MINIMUM NAI PANEL EDGES. 10D AT
6" ON'CENTER,'INTERMEDIATE SUPPORT 10D AT 12" ON. CENTER.
11. FRAMING CONNECTORS SHALL HAVE ICBO APPROVAL AND••BE MANUFACTURED BY
P. H. BOWMAN CO., INC., SEATTLE, WASHINGTON; SIMPSON'CO., SAN_ LEANDRO, .
CALIFORNIA; OR APPROVED EQUAL. .
12. WOOD TRUSSES SHALL-BE MANUFACTURED BY AN,APPROVED TRUSS MANUFACTURER.
TRUSSES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CARRY THE' LOADS)LISTED IN•THEDESIGN •
CRITERIA AND ANY.ADDITIONAL LOADS INDICATED ON FRAMING PLANS. SHOP
DRAWINGS FOR THE COMPLETE TRUSS ASSEMBLY INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED '
BRIDGING•OR BLOCKING AND CONNECTIONS TO BEARING WALLS, BEAMS, ETC.,
SHALL BEAR THE. .STAMP OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER•LOCATED TO PRACTICE IN
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. .
GOODMAN BUILDING ADDITION
G E N E R A L ' N O T E S
1. ALL METHODS AND MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM BUILDING
CODE (1982 EDITION) AND REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF TUKWILA CODES. •
2. DESIGN DATA:
ROOF LIV LOAD 2 PS F SEISMIC ZONE 3
'WIND LOA 2 PS F ALLOW. SOIL BEARING 2000 PSF
UPPER LE LIVE LOAD GO PSF, ZONING M -1'
OCCUPANC GROUP B2 (OWNER TYPE .OF CONSTRUCTION 5/..--N OCCUPIED) •.
3. FOUNDATION: ALL FOOTINGS TO BEAR ON FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH, 1' -6"
MINIMUM BELOW FINAL SUBGRADE. BACYFILL TO BE THOROUGHLY COMPACTED.'
"PROVIDE (2) e4 REBAR CONTINUOUSLY AT BOTTOM OF ALL WALLS C ONE (1) . • •
q4 REBAR AT TOP OF WALL• •
4, CONCRETE: ALL CONCRETE FOR FOUNDATION FOOTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
28 -DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 2500 PSI. UNSUPERVISED CONCRETE FOR
ALL FLOOR SLABS ON ,GRADE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF
2500 PSI. ,
5.. REINFORCING: ALL REINFORCING TO BE INTERMEDIATE GRADE DEFORMED BARS
ASTM 615 GRADE 40, „
•
•
•
14. 'EXTEND EXISTING CENTRAL - MONITORING FIRE ALARM AND SECURITY SYSTEM
TO NEW ADDITION.
m
CONCRETE COVER OF REINFORCING:
FOUNDATION ;"
PILASTERS 1 -1/2"
LAP ALLr'REINFORCING.24.DIAMETERS
TRUS- JOISTS SHALL BE MANUFACTURED ONLY IN A TRUS -JOIST CORPORATION
PLANT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER
RESIDENT AT THE PLANT IN'ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVED SHOP DRAWINGS:. THE
. ENTIRE •TRUSS,ASSEMBLY,'INCLUDING BEARING CLIPS, ANCHORING NAILS OR • '
LAGS,•.AND'"'BRIDGING CLIPS SHALL BE AS APPROVED CURRENT ICBO'REPORT.
TRUS- JOISTS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO CARRY THE LISTED IN THE DESIGN
CRITERIA AND ANY ADDITIONAL'LOADS 'INDICATED ON THE FRAMING'PLAN'. PRO-
VIDE SHOP AND INSTALLATION DRAWINGS PRODUCED UNDER THE.SUPERVISION OF
AND BEARING THE STAMP OF A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER,REGISTERED AS,SUCH IN •
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. DETAIL'DRAWINGS TO INDICATE TYPES,. SIZE,-
SPAC ,(NG,•BRIDGING,•CONNECTIONS; ANC ORING, BEARING PLATE AND OTHER: "r "" ,
.T
- PERTINEN'DETAILS «7 - " - �__
PARKING
GROSS BUILDING AREA
REQUIRED PARKING '
PARKING SHOWN
MINN
111L 1 19851
Cl.( ; l'ui.
PLAN,.ING D'01'•
O E- C C T Lb LI 1 G rIT
INbUstpi^�
9022 S.F.
1/400 S.F. = 22
29
•
7
'4
C
111
2
UI
T
4
0
r
5
W
a ' W
'Y
D .
0
u•
0 • '
2 • •
0
I •
2
0
IA
w
D
II1111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIIII " IIIIIIIIIIIIIQ1 1 1 1 . 11 ( I I I f 11 µu11.1 1 1 1 1 1 111111.1111111 1 1 11
0 ,.. "..." 1 2 3' . 4._.: - ., ,,5,.. . . 6. - 7 ....L. „ 9 ' 10 11 00UW rrc 12
' (IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LES
' ( CLEAR T THI IT 13'DUE T O'�
OE 6z Be cz "sz sz" •at ez1 'zz ' 1 THE UAIATY OF THE' ORIGINAL. +' a _. e.... c s s , n e z I wwp •
.. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIiIIIIIIII (III (III (III (III (III (II IIIIIIl11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIItII InIIIIIIIIlIl111IIIIIIIIII III II IIII
(I ......
•
I