Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 81-27-UI - ST REGIS PAPER COMPANY - INTERPRETATION USE81-27-ui southcenter south st regis paper company use interpretation X19 08 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila Washington 98188 Frank Todd, Mayor Grubb F, Ellis Commercial Brokerage Co. 2031 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98121 Attn: Roger Ahroon Subject: St. Regis Paper Co. Proposal 4 August 1981 In response to your letter of 3 August 1981, you have asked for an interpretation of zoning regulations in regard to the proposed plastic bag manufacturing operation contemplated by St. Regis in the Southcenter South Industrial Park. I will try to summarize the pertinent facts: A) As you know, Southcenter South is zoned M -2 (heavy industry), but is limited to M -1 (light industry) uses only by stipulation of the park's Shoreline Management Permit. B) TMC 18.42.010 (30) permits the following use in the M -2 zone: "Manufacture, assembly of processing - any of the following pro- ducts... plastics and plastic products" C) St. Regis, we understand, intends to manufacture a plastic bag product from pre - manufactured chemical plastic material. Based on these facts, the Planning Director has determined that the pro- posed St. Regis Paper. Company operation is not an allowed use under Southcenter South's current zoning status. D) Two alternatives are open to the property owner with regard to opening the site to the use which St. Regis desires: Do nothing and allow the City to rezone the site to the C - (industrial park) classification and modify the text of the zoning ordinance to allow plastic materials processing in the C -M district. If Draft Zoning Ordinance #4 and its concomittant zoning map, now in hearings before the City Council, are adopted as they now exist, then the St. Regis operation will become a per- mitted use in that location and the current zoning problem will "go- away ". The disadvantages of this alternative are a) we have no assurance at this point that the zoning text or map will not change to St. Regis' disadvantage between now and the time of adoption b) we have no way of predicting at this time when the new ordinance will actually take effect, as potential lawsuits or injunctions may delay its implementation even after it is formally enacted by the City Council. Intitiate an application to amend the park's existing Shoreline Management Permit restoring full M -2 use of that particular site. The disadvantages of this approach are a) the minimum 90 -day time -frame required to process a Shoreline Management Permit b) we cannot assure you that a favorable decision will result. Further, there may be legal complications in changing the M -1 use restriction relative to previous private covenants of sale within the Southceri.ter South complex which would preclude amending the Shoreline Permit. You have also asked that I comment on the fact that the Cello -Bag Company is operating a plastics- processing plant similar to that proposed by St. Regis in an M -1 zoning district. The Cello -Bag plant opened . in 1963 according to our records. The M• -2 zoning ordinance as it now appears in the iNC was adopted seven years later 1970. Whether the Cello -Bag opera - tion predated our zoning code and is therefore a legal, non - conforming use, or the City Supervisor in 1963 formally interpreted zoning regulations then in force as allowing plastics processing in M -1 in unclear. In any case, staff is obligated to interpret the Zoning Code today irrespective of past irregularities. Thus, we conclude that the Cello -Bag operation has little relevance to the question before us concerning St. Regis Paper. I hope that this information clarifies the City's position as requested in your August third letter. MC/b lk Tukwila Planning Department Brad Collins, Director I�t�ar'k Cattghey Associate Planner Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING ss. M o e.1.e...RQe being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that Atha is the ..Ci '3 , ......G.a erk of THE DAILY RECORD CHRONICLE, a newspaper published six (6) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a newspaper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Daily Record Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed is a _meeting 21692 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of I consecutive issues, commencing on the ....13...da Atiggst ,19 81 , and ending the day of ,19 , both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.10...8Qwhich has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred word for each subsequent insertion. ....Chief....Click Subscribed and sworn to before me this 25 day of August , 19 81 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at King County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. V.P.C. Form No. 87 Rev. 7 -79 ti