HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-17-79 - SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE - DESIGN REVIEWdr-17-79
375 corporate drive
78-08-l
dr-26-79
epic-fd-108
southcenter corporate square
Arc hitec 1urf- cmri Plchnnir
eoson Pornvarny Northwfrsl 1,Thycv) A Rr A A A IR4A A VV lkrk(-) hvr Nnrlt r-(iltl() Wash QM( )) (. ( 284Y/1
/1
MEMORANDA
TO: Rodger Blaylock
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Blvd.
'Tukwila, Washington
SUBJECT: Building Permit Drawings
c c.
DATE: June 12, 1979
PROJECT: S.C.S. South
B.C.S. Office Bldg.
PROJECT N0: NW 79009
Per our discussion on June 8, 1979, it is our understanding
that the Planning Department has not signed -off on the per-
mit drawings because approved landscape plans were not
included. Otherwise, the drawings are in compliance with
the requirements of the Planning Commission as determined
at the May 2, 1979 meeting.
Detailed landscaping plans are now being prepared and, will
be submitted for B.A.R. approval when they are completed.
O.C.D.
Clr' OF TUKWILA
BY: Bob Kacel, Project Architect JUN 1 3 1979
I ` �i �s t , City Of Tukwila
19
DB
TO: Terr 1 onaghan, Public Works Director
FROM: F , ped N. Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor
DATE: 25 May 1979
SUBJECT: Sout}1center Corporate Square: Dedication of Roadways
FNS /ckh
Attachment
cc: OCD Dir
Mayor
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
This is to inform you that the Planning Commission has recommended the
City accept dedication of the two cul -de -sac streets in the Southcenter
Corporate Square development. The Commission took this action at their.
regular May meeting (24 May 1979).
I will try to remember to forward a copy of the Planning Commission
minutes on this item as soon as they are approved and published. Pro - .
cedurally, I believe you are now free to forward this matter to the City
Council for a decision.
1
Planning Commission fates
May 24, 1979
Page 5
PUBLIC H °'ING: Southcenter Corporate Square Streets
d Satterstrom, Planning Supervisor, read the Staff Report on the request of the
owners of the Southcenter Corporate Square development that the City of Tukwila
accept dedication of two unnamed cul -de -sac streets in that development. The
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council accept
the dedication of the roadways within Southcenter Corporate Square contingent
upon completion of the required legal documents.
MOVED BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMEND THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT THE DEDICATION OF THE TWO UNNAMED STREETS IN THE
SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE DEVELOPMENT. MOTION CARRIED.
Mrs. Avery recommended that one of the streets be named after Mayor Bauch.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
Development Plans: Parkway Square - Hayden Island
Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner, read the Staff Report, including findings,
conclusion, and recommendations. He said that Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director, suggested
that the 5 -foot sidewalk shown along Southcenter Parkway be a requirement. He
stated the Public Works Department has not had the opportunity to review the
revised site plan as presented here tonight.
David Hickman, representing the developer, stated the sides shown as concrete
block should be beveled wood. He said it appears the main problem has been with
the parking and they have had no problem in revising and meeting the City requirement.
He said with respect to Item 2 of the Staff recommendations, they have responded
to that with a lane allowing the cars to come through. He said if the Board of
Architectural Review does not approve that plan, he hoped they would approve their
project subject to staff review of the parking so they can continue to work with
the staff on their recommendations. He said this was the first he had seen the
Staff report and recommendations.
Chairman Kirsop said it appears the proposed roof top sign will not meet the sign
code requirements, but that matter does not need to be taken care of at this time.
Peter Gindale, representing the developer, said the parking on the north side of
the building would be for the employees. He said he felt the parking in the front
was sufficient for the customers since the building had been shifted about 5 feet
south to accommodate the parking. Discussion continued regarding the flow of
traffic within the parking area as customers drive up to a pick -up are to receive
purchases too large to carry out of the store, such as bicycles, etc. Mr. Hickman
said the customer pick -up would not be in front of the store, but rather to the
rear, and the circulation would be controlled.
Mrs. Avery expressed concern about the lack of landscaping. Mr. Hickman said they
had not submitted the landscape plans yet, that will be done at a later date for
staff approval. He said the islands would be landscaped and there would be other
landscaping.
Mr. Richards said he thought the parking situation at the Doubletree should be
resolved and the main entrance situation should be resolved and modified to
accommodate the traffic in a public right -of -way. Mr. Welsh said he would like
to recommend that the developer work with the Planning Staff and come up with a
recommendation or plan that would be suitable.
Dear Mr. Kacel:
RJB /ckh
cc: Ping. Sup.
File
Citycf Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Office of Community Development
Mr. Bob Kacel, Project Architect
Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.
1844 -A Westlake Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98109
7 May 1979
RE: Southcenter Corporate Square Building #11
BCS Office Building
433 -1845
The development plans for the Boeing Computer Services Office Building
located in Southcenter Corporate Square were reviewed and approved by
the Tukwila Planning Commission on Wednesday, May 2, 1979, with the
following stipulations:
1. That no physical improvements be located on the 30 foot road
and utility easement and a dumpster shall not be located within
this area.
2. That detailed landscaping plans be approved by the Board of
Architectural Review prior to issuance of an occupancy permit.
If I can be of any further assistance, please call.
Sincerely,
Roger J. Blaylock
Assistant Planner
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
MOTION CARRIED.
City of Tukwila
Planning Division
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Office of Community Development
PLANNING COMMISSION
433 -1845
Minutes of the continued April Planning Commission meeting, 2 May 1979.
Chairman Kirsop convened the continued April meeting at 8:02 p.m. in the Police
Training Room. Commissioners in attendance were: Mrs. Avery, Mr. James, Mr.
Kirsop, Mr. Orrico, Mr. Sowinski, and Mr. Welsh. Roger Blaylock represented
the Planning Division staff.
VELOPMENT PLANS: SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE BUILDING #11, BCS OFFICE BUILDING
Roger Blaylock, Assistant Planner, read the staff report including the findings,
conclusions, and recommendations. He stated that due to the size of the building
a sprinkler system will be required.
Bob Kacel, architect, said this is not the site plan for the previous Building
#11, that is null and void. He said it is planned to sprinkle the building in
accordance with the fire code. Ed Hunt, McCann Construction, said the parking
requirements have been established by studies of the Boeing Company, who will
occupy the building. He circulated photos taken of the parking lot to indicate
the orderly parking system.
Mrs. Avery said she had driven through the parking lot at noon and she had found
many parking spaces in the parking lot. Mr. Kacel said the proposed parking lot
will fit in with the others that have been built for the Boeing Company.
Mr. Hunt said there is a 30 foot easement. The utilities consist of sanitary
sewer and storm sewer. He said there is no possibility of a street being built
there as J.C. Penney's cuts off the possibility of a street.
MOVED BY SOWINSKI, SECONDED BY AVERY, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE
DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. THAT NO PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS BE LOCATED ON THE 30 FOOT ROAD AND
UTILITY EASEMENT AND A DUMPSTER SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THIS
AREA.
2. THAT DETAILED LANDSCAPING PLANS BE APPROVED BY B.A.R. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT.
FINDINGS:
3. The parking stalls are 9 x 18 feet.
CONCLUSIONS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
26 April 1979 8 :00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM VI D DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Southcenter Corporate Square
Building #11 /BCS Office Building
Mr. Bob Kacel of Leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc., has submitted development plans for
Building #11 in Southcenter Corporate Square. The building will house Boeing Com-
puter Service.
The development plans (Exhibit A and B) propose a 31,408 square foot, two (2) story
building on approximately a 160,244 square foot site. The building will be finished
with 1" x 6" channel groved cedar siding. The windows will be clear glass with dark
bronze anodized aluminum frames, (Exhibit C).
1. The site is located in the C -M District.
2. The development plans show 145 parking spaces which utilize ten (10) feet of
easement reserved for roads, utilities, and railroad trackage.
4. Southcenter Corporate Square presently has approximately 199,000 square feet of
office space along with 1,239 available parking spaces.
5. The Bedford Building which is presently used by Boeing Computer Service was not
designed as an office building and it lacks the necessary parking. TMC requires
112 parking spaces, while only 60 spaces are provided.
6. Overflow parking from the Bedford Building is channeled across the street into
Southcenter Corporate Square parking lots.
7. At the present time, 1,375 Boeing employees occupy 236,000 square feet of office
space. This breaks down to 5.8 employees per 1,000 square feet.
8. Present employment exceeds available parking by 136. However, not every employee
drives an automobile. A recent parking utilization analysis taken by LPN (Exhibit
D) suggests that on an average only 960 spaces are utilized or 69.8 percent of the
present number of employees. The functions of BEC are explained in Exhibit E.
9. The trash container is located on a road and utility easement.
1. An office is an allowed use in the C -M District.
•
RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission Page 2
Staff Report 26 April 1979
2. The parking shown complies with the requirements of the TMC (98 spaces). The
dimensions of the parking stalls and aisles comply with the established cri-
teria. However, the utilization of a road and utility easement for parking
will not be allowed by the Department of Public Works. The parking lot located
immediately to the east of the site does not utilize the 30 foot road and
utility easement. Access must be maintained because of the location of a major
storm sewer.
3. The necessary parking required to provide adequate parking for the Boeing
Company was the primary reason for denying the development plans for Building
#11 in October of 1978. The Parking Utilization Analysis is not based on suf-
ficient data to support their conclusion that only 70% of the employees drive
automobiles to work. Assumptions are not clearly stated; therefore, it is
impossible to use the analysis as a precise tool. One major flaw in the data
is that of the observation times. I would suspect that parking demand would
be higher in the early morning and late afternoon as a result of the general
operational nature of salesmen, consultants and high level administrators.
Plus the counts were taken at different times on different days. This doesn't
consider operational schedules, field work, vacations, or flex time.
The question still arises what is "adequate "? The TMC standards are an average.
An office worker is usually given less than 16 x 20 foot working space, which
considered alone would mean that the TMC is too low. However, the economics of
mobility have to be considered. Without a detailed parking analysis study over
a two week period what is "adequate" can not be determined. Such a study would
probably fall within 10% plus or minus of the preliminary average. The available
parking is proposed to have that 10 percent expansion capacity above estimated
utilization. In any event the parking provided will exceed that required by
TMC by over 500 spaces.
The staff recommends that the development plans for the BCS Office Building in
Southcenter Corporate Square be approved with the following conditions:
1. That no physical improvements be located on the 30 foot road and utility ease-
ment.
2. That detailed landscaping plans be approved by B.A.R. prior to issuance of
occupancy permit.
PLANNING
PARRS d
RECREATION
BUILDING
25 August 1978
Should you have
R
!.�G W es-
yred . Srattersi rom
Planning Supervisor
cc: OCD Dir
Mayor
Mr. Ed Hunt
c/o McCann Construction Co.
P.O. Box 88314
Tukwila, Washington 98188
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY OEVELOPMENT
RE: Building No. 11: Southcenter Corporate Square
Dear Mr. Hunt:
Please be advised that per your request the Tukwila Planning Commission
has dropped the above - referenced project from their agenda until such
time as a complete site plan application with parking information is
submitted. This action was taken at the regular meeting'of the Planning
Commission, 24 August 1978.
any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
i
6230 Southcenter Boulevard . Tukwila, Washington 98188 s (206) 292 -2177'
+ . ......�.�,
Planning Commission ( Page 2
Minutes 24 August 1978
Mr. Hunt explained that the trucks probably won't come from that direction because
the main entrance was from Todd Boulevard.
Mr. Lloyd McDonald of Pacific Metals, explained that truck drivers do not like to
back in from the right because it is a blind side. He also mentioned that the
trucks were making the back up maneuver in a 60 foot area at their present location
on First Avenue.
Mr. Hartong stated the trucks could not back in without running over the curb or
going over parking stalls.
Chairman Kirsop asked what kind of tracks were located behind the proposed build-
ing. Mr. Croonquist said one main line track and one spur track.
Mr. Croonquist mentioned that they had discussed the site plan with Mr. Satterstrom
Mr. Satterstrom explained that he had talked with Mr. Tom Croonquist and had told
him that the maneuvering was tight.
MOTION BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MR. BOWEN AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN
FOR McCANN PROJECT #433 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. APPROVAL OF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN BY THE B.A.R. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT;
2. ARCHITECTURAL SCREENING OF ROOF - MOUNTED EQUIPM•1ENT;
3. PROVISION OF 9' x 20' PARKING STALLS, PER TMC 18.56;
4. LANDSCAPE TREATMENT OF RIVER ZONE TO BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
TUKWILA SHORELINE PROGRAM, AND INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN MENTIONED
ABOVE IN ITEM #1.
5. THAT THE LOCATION OF THE PARKING LOT BE AS SPECIFIED PER CODE.
Mr. Hartong voted N0.
UILDINa #11, SOUTHCEI1TER CORPORATE SQUARE (B.A.R..)
Mr. Satterstrom read the staff report.
Mr. Ed Hunt, McCann Construction Company, said he had no comments.
MOTION BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY MR. BOWEN AND CARRIED TO DROP BUILDING #11,
SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE, FROM THE AGENDA UNTIL THE REQUESTED INFORMATION
IS SUBMITTED.
REVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE
Mr. Satterstrom read the staff report.
Chairman Kirsop called a work session for 14 September 1978.
Planning Commission Page 3
Minutes of Special Meeting 17 August 1978
MOTION BY MR. BOWEN, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI AND CARRIED THAT THE COMMISSION
DENY THE PROPOSAL FOR ACCESS AS EXHIBITED DUE TO INADEQUATE SPACE, POTENTIAL
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS AND REASONS STATED IN STAFF REPORT.
�t1ILDINGS #10 AND #11: SOUTHCENTER CORPORATE SQUARE
Mr. Satterstrom read the staff report and explained displayed drawings.
Mr. Robert Kacel, Leason Pomaroy N.W., representing applicant, explained drawings
further. He explained the overflow parking is due to tenant's (Boeing) needs.
There was a discussion regarding the temporary parking lot. Mr. Hunt explained
that it was still being used and that the Commission had previously approved
continued usage as long as it was upgraded, landscaped and the driveway was re-
moved. He stated the above conditions are done or in progress.
Mr. Hunt.explained that Boeing has comitted to Building #10 but not #11.
Mr. Satterstrom mentioned that there was a question in his mind regarding
approval of Building #10 and not #11. He suggested that the Commission consider
each building separately to insure code requirements are met for both.
Mr. Hunt stated that it was their intention to have both buildings considered
separately.
Commission agreed to review Building #10 and #11 separately.
MOTION BY MRS. AVERY, SECONDED BY P1R. BOWEN AND CARRIED TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN
• FOR BUILDING #10 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. APPROVAL OF A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN BY THE B.A.R. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE
OF OCCUPANCY PERMIT, SUCH PLAN TO INDICATE TREATMENT OF ALL UNPAVED AREAS.
2. ARCHITECTURAL SCREENING OF ROOF - MOUNTED EQUIPMENT.
MOTION BY MR. SOWINSKI AND SECONDED BY MR. RICHARDS TO TABLE THE SITE PLAN FOR
BUILDING #11 UNTIL SUCH TIME AS SUFFICIENT PARKING DATA IS AVAILABLE.
Discussion on parking requirements ensued.
MOTIOIN CARRIED WITH MR. BOWEN VOTING NO.
L •
Chairman Kirsop recessed the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
Chairman Kirsop called the meeting back to order at 10:00 p.m.
JOHN GRAHAM OFFICE BUILDING (HADEN ISLAND OFFICE BUILDING)
Mr. Satterstrom read the staff report and explained displayed drawings.
CI T Y OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
24 August 1978 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM IV B. Building #11 (Southcenter Corporate Square)
At the special meeting of 17 August 1978, the Planning Commission tabled
this agenda item until a detailed site plan was and a parking needs study
had been completed and were available.
The applicant has notified the Planning Division by telephone that this
item be temporarily dropped from the agenda until further notice.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission drop this agenda item until
a complete application containing all information requested by the Commis-
sion is available.
F l t.!1!1ING
3UlLDIr
18 August 1978
Dear Mr. Kacel:
FNS /cis'
cc: . Mayor
OCD Dir
Robert E. Kacel, Architect
leason Pomeroy Northwest, Inc.
1844 -A Westlake Ave. N.
Seattle, WA 98109
C I v of "!7' L.h VCUV E1 .
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: Buildings 1110 and W11 Southcenter Corporate Square
The Tukwila Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Architectural Review
on 17 August 1978 reviewed the development plans for Buildings 1/10 and 1 /11
of Southcenter Corporate Square.
The Planning Commission approved the plans for Building'ii10 with the following
conditions:
1. Approval of a detailed landscape plan by the B.A.R. prior to
issuance of occupancy permit, such plan to indicate treatment
of all unpaved areas.
'2. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment.
The Planning Commission tabled action on the site plan for Building x`11 until
such time as sufficient parking data is available. 'Please contact me as early
as possible regarding the naturerof this parking data. Please he advised that
this matter will be placed on the Commission's regular 24 August 1978 meeting
for action should this information be available at that time.
Respectfully,
, l'''' ( 1 I A , i
1, L: t .: r•. i
Fred N. Satterstrom
Planning Supervisor
6230 South outer I:✓ulev.rt'dd tF Tukwila, 1.1ashi us; ton 99199 nr (206) 242-2177
V1
17 August 1978
CI T Y OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING CJMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM 110. Bui ldi nqs 10 & 11: Southcenter Corporate Square
The above - referenced project includes the construction of two additional
buildings, Buildings #10 and #11, in the Southcenter Corporate Square com-
plex at the west end of Corporate Drive. Both buildings are proposed as
2 -story office structures, having a combined total of 39,045 sq. ft. of
floor area. At this time, the site is developed as a parking lot and
handles overflow parking for Buildings 1 - 4.
According to the proposed site plan, access to the site is obtained by a
curb -cut from the end of the Corporate Drive cul -de -sac and by a curb -cut
from Corporate Drive just east of the beginning of the cul -de -sac.
Exterior treatment of the proposed structures is consistent with the
existing buildings in the Southcenter Corporate Square complex: T -111
plywood siding stained dark brown with clear glass windows.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed site plan and buildinn eleva-
tions with the .following conditions:
1. Approval of a detailed landscape plan by the B.A.P. prior to
issuance of occupancy permit, such plan to indicate treatment
of all unpaved areas.
2. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment.
; I .
1
1'
I •
I.
.••.• us ea ...Ss csa 44•010 I • II Ler o rono oo Mr.
err a ft..... rm.. tn • ...rut to a us
uu.. N. Ia.. *An A. ro rIn moo word.,
• ,.•; . .• •
fl
_I • otrInIn or ro Yr nn •11•
• • •••••ro =darn rro• • %row Ion Sao In. noon roan. noun ay Ina
••• arr% 1. forterfof Ina to eal 1 o/
• L. fon ran.. abr.* ono sat • Wm.% olosoroo orrolo ro, •
• . nen nu au • 4..4. sr... mem ••• I • on
•, • Ion.... roan non la to. o• • rim In or roo roan • ono. t• on lc
s ae • Slum muu of WI% %V. Y Ir... Po I+ *or r • oon•
• c 1.• o■ri sen11.1 r los I.,. gem 6 we roe, ;■••
•.A.. 10. mow se, ...141 I..4 e'4 144. ..• ea
• .• • • - • •
MIND OMMIN.•• aro= dat■ OfMr08 • ...NO rImmo of rrn .1•1■1ENDO■
. . • •
anfroon000nwor•■■••
•••
4-
4. 4„ 5 ,
I
• •
,/ , • • •
Mr • nor OW 1111, •••■• rim... or Vora ono •••■■•••• San.
11. • I; IMO oo • Mow Er rrolf..1 for ...or of or
roman, Ye • I ocr oftvonot e, Yea sow ;mom. aoln
1.•••••■••■ 1•111 to • awn ••• Yr 10 wenn ...a 141.16 Fri
rnr• of lin awn Mr of old on% Laa. ram ern Yr ..4 _,IS
I•edt•IVI IMO ort in • ra• Yr r morn% to or *CO nog
orronn •Ir *Orr sor oo ma ;rarer WC roan fn., ono no
worn. Yr /. W. • 1111 Ain so • root ow • Or Pr to .441S Is
tol On • r•1 oorrtf of On or ton of tn. or% LI. Mono nor ro
ono morrl Wleol•••1. Orr Ur ow • non ••• Arson Ir. •I
tro errant Ir. %rim or. are moron% ono Yen 1 11 ow 111
1•• KAN • B161•114 owl arr1110, Itr• nor oo Mr• •■•• 1•••
9
7
I
1.• !
5
u- - .
•
.14
74•11, . Z
- 1 "
If°
•••••••••■•■•••■••■■•••••■••••••••••••■=■•••••■••■■••••?....•■••.■-••—■••—•-•-•••••••••—.. •-----•-•••'"•4••••
•
• • . I ;11 •
I Building
I. 11
0'. •
"U
-,-.-.
•: n
••• • 4111•114o
11•■••••• ••••
Andover Park West • • f ur-- • •
SITE PLAN If •ACII
- t
:r.
BUILDING
'I
SOUTHCENTER
C`:`,:•;?CRATE
S'21:ARE
•
Li
.
_
. i
1 1 I I
I
9 p 9 •
, , , c .v.. m• ,......n.f
EXHIBIT IV - Southcenter Corporate-Square
Buildings #10 and #11
I -„ i Ci ,!••••■••*; !II • . ' 1 '
. — -
•
::
1 . .
• •
j ..
• . i '
t ;
.1
.,., 11
II.; ..
.
.... •• ,, .,..,
i ! . . ..
, . _
1 1 4 I
. : .1:•' ...., I ..! ...
r.... .
• *7•:
V:rei
".•
I
i I ,
_ •
- ......-Go. “. .r• niV
,( t. , .....: r.......
•
:::: •:,.•
INK=
..... - . •
. . - • a
•
• ELEVATION `• ....4
. ..• . • ...1, 11 • tOUTH
• •-: I
•
..• . .
.•0••••■ ,
.
'!" '..'r-f •
. - t I
• - -
• ' • !••
-T
•
• .‘• - ____ --
-1 — 1*, , 1 L
•
--••• .-- .--_.
LI . :
-_—__
I
'
*.
. 4.
. .0 Cl.., • •
,
4. • —.)
:414'11- .
• '..‘.. '.■:....
Y / ;
„
.
: I
■• i
.11..
—. -. •
I.
• .. • • ...., • •
a .
•
• I BUILDING 11 .A I . 4. Lc..t
(..• • , . e. .: •• ' 17. •
"...*
•I -. 4> .r
•
1.6 Cedor siding
I
!
.!.--
------ an stelr towers
..7.
7•111 Flyw000 Slana •
.--
Clear glass
. i .
. . .1*: • •:: ; -. ;"
- ft • - sm.; *AY •••,...-.,. sr.,
...r :A....4 • oc.: o
_ •L,
.
4 .,,
,-
. ,
. : •
. . .
1 1
• t
-
a•••••_ (...)
'• . '':
...::
i ' '
, , L__
,
.,
; 1 I
, ' I , . •
, 4 1
.
,:.:;:ea_is---
! .:
:-,-, 1 -____ I .
li
C:J
Tbyki
6 Ay
.._-rj
.. BUILDING 11 NORTH ELEVATION t?; • , .
1 .; ...,
1
. . -
. . .
_
::::..; 1 ..
- T -
... ............... ......
I'.•
• 'i•
.e.' '..,
i:
..,
.... -_ t:, ,......... „........... Bridge to Bidg.10
•-•;,...... --IC. •^ . ". 0,-.
— 1 t142s.b • . • ;
;
•
11
.
•
.., •
'
Ire.n 4 A...... I
'
.-__,-.......,...„-
1
_._
o...-
—
<
. .
- - I
,
t
.
• . . . , BUILDING 11 , WEST ELEVATION ••• l'...,1
• •
.
,..
- 1 ' • ' .
•
BUILDING
II I
.
Bldg.10
T•111 Plywood eld!ng
' •• 11
,,...........i
.......... 1
I,
I.
,........ 1
, ..
EAST BRIDGE ELEVATION 1 '.•.; I .•:•
•••••••••
r
IL
ro 147
i 1 .) • 1 , ) ( )
) - ,
., — 7 1
Z7.- • • . •
' coe...mant. pr.. , a00711
„,:••• acre •.;
•
r
0 23 40 10
.•••-•Th
SITE PLAN
SITE AREA 150.2441si
BLDG. AREA GROSS atA011u
PARKING:NEXT TO BLDG. 145 swot
1, Mew
EXLSTNG LOT 153 sums
•
e
•
e, __..!+.!—. f. ...'. i . ..; I
0 P 0 6.; P _ (- ..
I i 1 i . ! _ I
• 1 i . i .
0 :.
1. I_ • .... , 1
7 ....___1.1..
- 7P --
. -
!
1 , 1
, 1
Co
S. 4
•
.1 •
•
cr
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
!second floor similar 1 Ye • f:0"
v�r metal v
0I
C)
ui�li]':3�•�:.i.3:..' �.:.r.;. ^C. :na�nT Gae:.F. > x<: ,..Xia;.�r�.n.:Mx•'..•, Anr � .a_r�a- ,ec..r,.,.att.i.Ya.c �..sv_s. r..— r.a- ..,i�.r' Yi i 4
4YgJ 1.0.1 eljw••• r.#211.441 K ;
stww •iwt h trvn •Me•�-
., . r ..t..� ' . _ (1PSl.Jd21
1tr, earth V.** 4n �,
WOO.* JneJ --
vi )
IV01i.'1A . A
•
.!
..
t : I
•
': -'1
BCS/BEC PARKING UTILIZATION ANALYSIS
Southcenter Corporate Square : Bedford
1-79 4-79 8-79 1980
EXHIBIT D
BCS OFFICE BUILDING
BCS Employees (S.C.S.) 552 552 600 600
BCS Employees (Bedford) 156 156 156 156
Visitors 20 20 20 20
BEC Employees (S.C.S.) 530 600 600 630
Visitors 47 47 47 47
NEW BCS FACILITY --- --- 200 250
PERSONNEL TOTAL 1305 1375 1623 ,1733
Available Parking 1239 1239 1384 1384
Utilization (see graph) 1069 960. 1121 1232
Per Cent 86% 70% 81% 89%
Vacant Stalls 170 279 265 152
L)
5-
0
4-
a)
a)
s-
it)
N
a)
f-
O
0.
5-
V) C
W a)
a 0
V) 4- 3
U O
CO. 0
N
00 :01 00:6 01 o4 : 6 04,:k2 oo: t t
1;24-04 -q 64 .62.4 64132.4 b4-Z2-4 be..•OJ2 -4 64 -4.2•C
4 13;
cD
OS b
008
b
• b9 b
0 )J b b
e ig
OIB p
098
006
096 ,
000E
0901- tQ
001-L
091.1■
00ZL
o9ZL
00EL
09E1.
00171.
e Ode, ' g. � W :;' estigke ivc North dtt osh'.[ 8
f :eS.. }„i to 5 ..14 .. O €.; e 'GM' l' WaeL 1144 A'.�''�R-x"t,'i.s, n+ A7PWreilt .i ' % d U
MEMORANDA
TO: File
SUBJECT: Parking Tabulation
c c.
PARKING STANDARDS:
City of Tukwila:
LPN Planning Standards (office)
Bldgs. 1 & 2
Gross Bldg. Area 40,425 S.F.
Parking 146 cars
Ratio 1 per 277 S.F.
Bldgs. 3 & 4
Gross Bldg. Area 40,425 S.F.
Parking 133 cars
Ratio 1 per 304 S.F.
Bldgs. 10 & 11 (future)
Gross Bldg. Area 40,425 S.F.
Parking 183 cars
Ratio 1 per 221 S.F.
BY: Bob Kacel
Project Architect
Reorganized
DATE: April 12, 1979
PROJECT: Southcenter Corporate Square
PROJECT NO: NW 79009
3.1 cars per 1000 S.F. of
building. Gross square
footage (1 per 323 S.F.)
4 cars per 1000 S.F.
(1 per 250 S.F.)
with existing segregation
lines
I (
If
11
II
I t
Ji
It
•
INIIIIII07•NW•MNIII■10.0.•••••••.*
it
GENERAL FILL FOR BERMS
Material: '
Shall be a free draining pit run. The material shall not contain more than
percent total silt and clay by weight.
Sieve Percent Passing
Preparation:
Scarify existing grade to a depth of six ((a) inches in areas awe fill is
less than twelve (12) inches. No scarification needed where fill is deeper
than twelve (12") inches.
Placement:
Provide fill in eight (8") inch (maximum) lifts.
' Grade to a smooth even finish subgrade,
Compaction shall be 95% under paving and 80% in all planting areas as determined
by A.S.H.O. 7-180-c. Compaction shall be to a depth of six (6) inches. Contractor
shall-provide two (2) in-place density tests in paving areas and provide test
. results from an approved testing laboratory, prior to paving.
TOPSOIL FOR LAWN
' Provide topsoil 'in lawn areas two (2) inches deep after shrinkage and compactibn.
' Ibpsoil for lawn areas shall be 75% soil and 25% 'Steerco or approved equal.
•:Source: Iddings Farm Service
SOil shall meet the following:
Size Sieve
SPECIFICATIONS
Material:
All lines shall be P.V.C.
Main lines: Class 200
Lateral lines: Class 160
Automatic Controller
eToro Monitor" or equal.
•
No. 4
No, 8
No. 100
• 3/8
flo. 20
No. 60
No. 270
A.S.T.M., E-11
A.S.T.M., E-11
A.S:T.M., E-11
A.S.T.M., E-11
•
85 - 100
0- 90
0- 10
Percent Passing
100 •
77 - 100 .•
0 . 23 .
0 - 10
Fertilizer for Lawn Areas: •
first application 10-20-20
50% of the nitrogen shall. be derived from Nitroform "Blue Chip".
Potash shall be derived from sulfate 'of potash.
Lawn installation fertilizer 5hall he retained by Taylor standard sieves
as follows:
IRRIGATION '
General:
1. The•irrigation system shall be contractor designed.
2. . Coverage shall include all planted areas.
3. The system shall connect to the meter provided for the irrigation system
(see plan). The meter will be provided and paid for by the Owner.
4. The system shall be preceded with a sleeved stop and waste malVV
. (prooide key).
5. The entire system shall he capable of being winterized by the use of a
1-1/2 quick coupler valve located down stream of the backflow preventer.
6. Provide scaled as-built drawings.
Depth of bury
Shrub areas: 12 inches (min.)
Lawn areas: 8 inches (mid.)
Sprinkler heads
Lawn: Gress, Hi-pop type
Shrub: Brass, on galvanized risers, firmly staked in-place.
Back flow preventer
Single, pressure type or dourble check assembly
Valves: 24.V., brass, automatic
MG - 4%
Fe - 3%
Sulphur (5) - 5%
been thoroughly aerated during the drying process.
12 T<V-=.5- fl-e\hrirlel •
PY/t/x4 rit •
W/r1 f2fN
446-tEev /4/
f3e.o4/,c=a 2" ,E
/4/ *vreir4/4,4,
44/17/1/tri •
/1141I er=r 77/14E-S..0.0)4
. i'r4rfr219./-1-,
/1119calic:
>m?_ 7LZ
/2 7Aa65! --
/4v4341 ow-A.<
1 - 0
C=a 2.7
' '7i4257 4%7 - 1:f;<' jg
yrristm: 4i# " /4/17.3
.//Vercyca.,/vt? .
DETAILS DR-0.71
• - . .••• , •
Second application 6-2-4 (after first mowing)
The 6-2-4 fertilizer shall contain the following per ton:
Nitrogen shall be totally derived from the following sources:
1,020 lbs. Milorganite
160 lbs. Nitroform "Blue Chip"
Phosphoric acid shall be derived from Milorganite
Potash shall be derived from sulfate of potash-magnesia.
In addition to the above, the fertilizer shall contain the following
elements:
Placement:
I. Apply topsoil in one lift and grade to a smooth even finish grade.
Apply 10-20-20 fertilizer at the rate of thirty (30) pounds per 1,000
square feet, together with dolomite limestone at the rate of fifty (50)
pounds per 1,000 square feet.
3. Till the above into the topsoil. Remove any rocks one (1) inch or larger.
which may be brought to the surface from the subgrade.
Grade
foot. to a smooth even finishgrade free of undulations and tracks. °Roll
for firmness using a roller not weighting more than 100 pounds per square
5. Obtain approval for finish grades before sodding. • •
TOPSOIL FOR TREES sliKtre`i
Topsoil: Shall be two-way nix consisting of//3 soil and 1/3 organic matter,
with a PH range of 5.0 to 6.5 with dolomitic limestone added as necessary to
attain this range. . .
Soil: Shall meet the following:
Size SAUP Percent Passing •
3/8 A.S.T.M., E-11 100 '
No. 10 A.S.T.M.. I-11 . 85 - 100
No. 270 A.S.T.M., L-11 10 - 50
0.002 MA Clay 0 7 10
Organic matter: Organic Matter shall be derived from spaghnum peat or
approved substitutes such as fiberous sedge. wood or reed type peat. Sub-
stitutes shall contain less than 20 percent of ash by dry weight, shall have
a rafisture content of less than 50 percent of the wet weight and shall have '
•
, iffropirirtitrifirir - rgyFiriltrttirripirrirrtlirlipTrfrn111
1
- ;
7 en n T em so vu T or T TIT TIT et Ot 0 11 5 11 1
!!!!!!utiot °opt !Om trit loom RH oplilit iiiiluit
SOD •
Procedure:
1 .4,4,0s
c
Dolomite Lime Stone: Fine grind dolomite.lime shall be packaged in new, water- • TREE WRAP . . ..;:
," proof, non-overlaid bags, clearly labeled as to weight, manufacturer and content. t • 1=-1
, , Shall be if wide Purlap or heavy rciofcczc . .! paper rade fcr trunk wrappint
' Placement: Place in one lift and grade to a smooth even finish grade. .Heavy duty plastic ribbon shall be used to fasten wrap to tree. i• tti
C
Premium General Lawn, 70% to 80% "herbs" Bluegrass and 20Z to 30% "highland
'Bentgrass" or "Creeping" Red Fescue hy weight.
Sod shall be one-year old.
Sod shall be dense with grass having been cut one (I) Inch or less i ,atwittI
height prior to its being lifted from the field. Sod shall he in a vigorous
condition, dark green in eel°, and IITO Irma disease and harmlul insects.
TREES, : 'OBS
Quality: All plants shall be nursery grown, or normal habit of growth. healthy,
vigorous and free nf disease, insect eget and Wm. 'Plants shall mit he pruned
prior to delivery. fhtniing of plant matoviel shall be to accordahLe with the'
code of standards of the American Association of Mursomen. Nomenciature shall
conform with Standardized Plant Whims, secend mIltion, IOC Names nut present
in this listing shall conform to accepted noumnclature in the nitrate trede.
2. Tree pits shall be 2 feet greater in ,tslttt than the hall of earth or
spread of roots el the tree (minimm)
3. Set plants at the some relationship to finished grade as they•bore to the
ground from which they were dug. Allnw sufficient liev.lor filled dms
to settle prior to plarine plants.
4. BackfilI with t000il. Wfien pima pits MVU been bahl.Mited apt
2/3 full, water thoroughly befine•installing remainder at soil to top of pi I.
5. Set trees plumb and brace rigidly it position titl.l I he 'lei itol oil has
been tamped solidly ,onunt the ball wed/or roots.
6. Belled and burlapptd plent hAB). tut ropes or mixings from tup ol ball aml
remove burlap front top 1/3 of hall. Torn under and bury removed portions id
burlap.
Water all plants thortmehly and immeetitely after plaeLing.
8. • Waste excess soil. over nearby low areas or. spread evenly over area. to bt .
sodded before placement of top..r..1.
!Igo!
•
All tree watering basins and planting beds shall be covered with two (1) inchei ti
Steerco or approved ceim1, Which shall be adequately protected against loss due
to wind or over sprintline. •
1. All plant pitsshell he eiravated with vertical,sides.
7
44*-
0,=;7 mi ,4r74
W o• 441/4-.s.
C.-7, 444? 44siv
2x2x/o'.4it:e-e-74.4s 75 - .2
41/4! e...*/g"//1/,
c.ezata?
2" 4/e/zz-e-4 seT•
/9'azz .-74A777,`-5/14e.
/4' 4e-./,
7nEe )7_7
... 41/44 /2a
:`' a 77-6.94/
/.3:15
• 4/0:4€ 7zy°
• reet
; IF THIG MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
1 QUALITY I.
THE ITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
. . . _ ....._ .._ _ .
* WI,*
4fs
•
: GUYJNG AND STAKING MATERIAL "
Stakes for tree sepport.
. I. !lonstruction grade Douglas fir.
2. Minimum nominal slze: 2 in. x 2 in. .or 2 1/2 inches in diameter and
ooinled at one end.
Guying wire: Galvanized iron or steel 20 guage wire.
Hose: new vinyl hose.
DR- 1i-19
4 •
Re co o VED
• - 7*
• op 10 .
P MUEVE 'Dr
JUNI 4 1979 2.1
.WILSEY & HAM
A, .0, a LiES
PERTIFICAti Na•239,
•
A N • '
•
1■■
:4 •
(I!
z
I S I eTIC 6/44/71 41
P105
iz
Ap ,4
.11