The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit DR-19-79 - PARKWAY SQUARE / HAYDEN ISLAND - DESIGN REVIEWdr-19-79 16600 southcenter parkway 16850 southcenter parkway dr-28-78 79-24-bsip parkway square hayden island 9 July 1979 Mr. David Hickman 12200 N. Jantzen Dr. Suite 450 _ Portland, OR 97217 RE: DEVELOPMENT PLANS (PARKWAY SQUARE - TUKWILA) Dear Mr. Hickman: The Tukwila Planning Commission considered the above referenced project at their regular June meeting, 28 June 1979. Please be informed the Com- mission approved the proposed site plan with the following conditions: 1. The western edge of the parking lot be located as required and as reflected in the revised site plan. 2. A 15 -foot landscape strip be provided adjacent to the western edge'of the parking lot. 3. A 5 -foot wide sidewalk be constructed on private property. 4. Curb -cut permit be issued by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of building permit. 5. Compliance with TMC 17.16 prior to the issuance of building permit. 6. A detailed landscape plan be approved by the Board of Archi- tectural Review prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. 7. Signs to comply with Sign Code, TMC 19. 8. Number of compact size parking stalls shall not exceed ten percent of the required off - street parking requirements. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at 433 -1847. Res ctfully, Ti : atterstro Planning Supervisor FNS /ckh cc: OCD Dir. Pub. Wks. Dir. Mayor City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development PLANNING COMMISSION MEF NG MINUTES June 28, 1979 Page 8 PUBLIC HEARING: Rezone - R -1 to C -1 (McCann No. 353) - contd. MOVED BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THEY GRANT THE REZONE REQUEST FROM R -1 -12.0 TO C -1 UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: THAT THERE BE A SETBACK OF 25', THE PARKING BE SCREENED WITH EVERGREEN SCREEN AND SET BACK 15', THAT THE BUILDING BE LIMITED TO TWO STORIES, AND IF THERE IS A BASEMENT IT BE CONSIDERED ONE OF THE TWO STORIES; THAT THE LAND USE BE RESTRICTED TO OFFICE USE ONLY AND NO RETAIL ALLOWED; FINAL DEVELOPMENT BE SUBJECT TO BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW; APPROVAL OF A DETAILED ACCESS PLAN BY THE TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT. IF, IN THE ASSESSMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND /OR CONDITIONS WARRANT ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS TO SOUTH 178TH STREET, THE DEVELOPER SHALL AT NO COST TO THE CITY EQUITABLY PARTICIPATE IN SUCH IMPROVEMENTS AND /OR DEDICATE THE REQUIRED PROPERTY NECESSARY FOR SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. TOTAL BUILDING AREA SHALL BE LIMITED TO 49,200 SQUARE FEET. MOTION CARRIED. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DEVELOPMENT PLANS: P way Square,- .'•en d Fred Satterstrom, lanning Supervisor, read t.- staff report, stating the development plans propose the co tion fo ctures with a total of 94,155 square feet. The largest building is 38,000 square feet plus 10,295 square feet of mezzanine space. It will house "Toys R Us," a retail toy store. Two buildings to the south will contain 18,600 square feet and 19,760 square feet for a total of 86,655 square feet of retail space. The free- standing building in the northwest corner of the site will contain 7,500 square feet of office space. These buildings will be treated with split face concrete blocks, beveled wood siding, sheet metal, and cedar shakes. He said the site is located in the C -M district. The development plans call for 442 parking spaces. The City requires only 241 parking spaces. Of these parking stalls 398 are 90 degree angle parking while the remaining 44 are 60 degree angled parking for compact cars. The design of the parking stalls conform with the proposed off - street parking design criteria. Only approximately 150 of the parking stalls meet minimum standard size dimension of 9 feet by 19 feet. It appears that the majority of the parking is designed for compact cars. The TMC requires that when property is being divided for the purpose of lease that a Binding Site Improvement Plan be filed on the subject property. One major access is proposed for all four buildings. It will be similar to the boulevard effect created in front of the Benaroya Office building and the new Doubletree Inn. The revised development plans have eliminated the shared minor access with the Doubletree Inn. The Transpo Group has completed a detailed traffic study of the Southcenter area, which states that there is an immediate need for the City to widen Southcenter Parkway by 12 feet. This would require acquiring 7 feet of property for pavement, while the sidewalk would be placed on private property. Landscaping is provided around the perimenters of the property. Along Southcenter Parkway the landscape strip is shown at 15 feet, while on the east, north and south boundaries the strip is 10 feet. Mr. Satterstrom said the project appears to be an appropriate development in the C -M district. It provides more than enough parking. The increased traffic being generated by each new project with the City has accumulated to a point where the streets have to be widened. The staff recommended the approval of the development plans with conditions. David Hickman, architect, said the developer did not have any objections to the conditions of recommendation. Mr. Sowinski asked what percentage of the parking is for smaller cars? Mr. Hickman said they meet the Code and all of the 90 degree parking stalls are standard size. Mr. Satterstrom explained the effect of condition (1) of the recommendations is to move the edge of the curb back 12 feet. Mr. Richards said the property line will be a curved line. Mr. Satterstrom said it could be as required by the Public Works Department and they could determine how much they need. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES June 28, 1979 Page 9 ( *MOTION CARRIED, AS AMENDED. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Parkway Square - Hayden Island - Contd. MOVED BY MR. RICHARDS, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PARKING AS PRESENTED AND THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTED BE APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: (1) THAT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT BE LOCATED AS REQUIRED AND REFLECTED IN THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED; (2) THAT A 15FOOT LANDSCAPE STRIP BE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT; (3) THAT A 5 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK BE CONSTRUCTED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY 7 FEET ADJACENT EAST OF THE PRESENT WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, DESIGN PLAN TO BE APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; (4) THAT CURB CUT PERMITS BE ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT; (5) THAT THE APPLICANT COMPLY WITH TMC 17.16 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY BUILDING PERMITS; (6) THAT A DETAILED LANDSCAPE PLAN BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT; (7) SIGNS ARE NOT APPROVED AND MUST COMPLY WITH SIGN CODE. * MOVED BY MR. SOWINSKI, SECONDED BY MR. ORRICO, TO AMEND THE MOTION AND ADD CONDITION (8) THAT COMPACT SIZE PARKING STALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED TEN PER CENT OF THE REQUIRED OFF- STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. MOTION CARRIED. DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Globe Plastics Mr. Satterstrom read the Staff report stating the project had been tabled by the Board of Architectural Review in February pending a legal opinion from the attorney. It was determined that the present processing operation is subordinate to the distribution and warehousing of plastic products. It is an allowed use. The proposed addition of 5,480 square feet of warehousing space is approximately a 22% expansion to the existing building. The site plan shows a reduction in the asphalt pavement on the parcel. Thirty -five parking spaces will be provided. The northern curb cut on Andover Park East is proposed to be enlarged to forty feet. This reduces the landscaping area slightly. Three 10 foot by 10 foot dock high truck doors are proposed directly behind the enlarged curb cut. He said the parking does not meet City requirements. The 28,245 square feet of warehouse would require 28.245 spaces and the office would require 6.944 for a total of 35.189 or 36 parking spaces. The Department of Public Works has not received an application for a curb cut permit to enlarge the northern curb cut on Andover Park East. It appears that the only reason why an enlarged curb cut is necessary would be to allow truck maneuvering on Andover Park East. The staff recommended that the Board of ARchitectural Review deny the request by Globe Plastics based upon the fact that the site does not provide adequate parking and on -site truck maneuvering as required by the City. Mr. Sconzo, architect, explained the truck maneuvering as they anticipated it could be done. Mr. Orrico suggested redesign to assure that there would never be any off -site trucking. Mr. Satterstrom explained how employees would be unable to get out of their parking area. Mr. Sconzo said if parking and turn - around is increased they would.have to leave out some of the landscaping. Mr. James asked if this matter should be referred to the Board of Adjustment? Mr. Satterstrom said it is. likely the developer could apply for a variance or revise the site plan. Mr. Sconzo said they could not build on the south, they can only expand to the west. MOVED BY MR. ORRICO, SECONDED BY MR. SOWINSKI, THAT THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DENY THE REQUEST BY GLOBE PLASTICS BASED UPON THE FACT THAT THE SITE DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE PARKING AND ON -SIDE TRUCK MANEUVERING AS REQUIRED BY THE TMC. MOTION CARRIED. FINDINGS: CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED STAFF REPORT 28 June 1979 8:00 P.M. AGENDA ITEM VIA • DEVELOPMENT PLANS: Parkway Square-Hayden Island, Inc. Mr. David Hickman Associates, Architects of Portland, Oregon has resubmitted devel- opment plans for the construction of Parkway Square. The project is located on a. 7.11 acre site just north of the Bon Marche's warehouse and immediately south of the proposed Doubletree Inn Hotel on the east side of Southcenter Parkway, (Exhibit A). The development plans (Exhibit B) proposes the construction of four (4) structures with a total of 94,155 square feet. The largest building is 38,000 sq. ft. plus 10,295 sq. ft. of mezzanine space.. It will house 'Toys "R" Us', a retail toy store. Two buildings to the south will contain 18,600 sq. ft. and 19,760 sq. ft. for a total of 86,655 sq. ft. of retail space. The free - standing building in the northwest corner of the site will contain 7,500 sq. ft. of office space. These buildings will be treated with split face concrete blocks, beveled wood siding, sheet metal, and cedar shakes, (Exhibits C, D, and E). 1. The site is located in the C -M District. 2. The development plans call for 442 parking spaces. TMC 18.56 requires only 241 parking spaces. Of these parking stalls 398 are 90 degree angled parking while the remaining 44 are 60 degree angled parking for compact cars. 3. The design of the parking stalls does conform with the proposed off - street parking design criteria. Only approximately 150 of the parking stalls meet minimum standard size dimension of 9 feet by 19 feet. It appears that the majority of the parking is designed for compact cars. 4. Tukwila Municipal Code 17.16 requires that when property is being divided for the purpose of lease that a Binding Site Improvement Plan be filed on the sub- ject property. 5. One major access is proposed for all four buildings. It will be similar to the boulevard effect created in front of the Benaroya Office Building and the new Doubletree Inn. 6. The revised development plans have eliminated the shared minor access with the Doubletree Inn. 7. The Transpo Group has completed a detailed traffic study of the Southcenter area, which states that there is an immediate need for the City of Tukwila to widen Southcenter Parkway by 12 feet. This would require acquiring 7 feet of property for pavement, while the sidewalk would be placed on private property. Planning Commission Staff Report Page 2 28 June 1979 8. Landscaping is provided around the perimeters of the subject property. Along Southcenter Parkway the landscape strip is shown at fifteen (15) feet, while on the east, north and south boundaries,the strip is ten (10) feet. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The project appears to be an appropriate development in the C -M District. It provides more than enough parking as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. The parking complies with the standards suggested in the proposed Off- Street Parking Area Dimensions. 2. The increased traffic being generated by each new project within the City has accumulated to a point, where the streets have to be widened. Parkway Square has been informed of this immediate need and the Planning Commission must seriously consider the effect on site planning for Parkway Square. In the cases of the Doubletree Inn and the Koehler Office Building this need had not been recognized at the time of approval of development plans. The result is a probable reduction of required landscaping. In the case of Parkway Square the 15 -foot landscaping strip should be required in addition to a 12 -foot strip needed for street widening. Therefore, the development should reflect this modification. Eventhough this would result in the loss of 12 to 15 parking spaces, the project would still comply with the number of parking spaces required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Board of Architectural Review approve the develop- ment plans for Parkway Square as presented in development plans dated 12 June 1979 with the following conditions: 1. That the western edge of the parking lot be located 27 feet east of the present western property line. 2. That a 15 -foot landscape strip be provided adjacent to the western edge of the parking lot. 3. That a 5 -foot wide sidewalk be constructed on private property 7 feet east of the present western property line, design plans to be approved by the Depart- ment of Public Works. 4. That a curb cut permit be issued by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. That the applicant comply with TMC 17.16 prior to the issuance of any build- ing permits. 6. That a detailed landscape plan be approved by the Board of Architectural Review prior to the issuance of an Occupancy Permit. 11 I SEAT rO L•l-Wl) vicinity map EXHIBIT A PARKWAY SQUARE-HAYDEN ISLAND, INC. Tukwila, Washington I- - TACOM 1 /APPL 1.-1 in c\1 0 LO R cu zo U ci < 2 0 ZI- jUJ a_ z0 ow >-> <LI I0 es 10 7 LY • 11 (,. I, Ito 1 non-retait space A 1 11.0' 75000 I 11 • Li ;11 I.L 1_1_1 I I 111 - 1 7 i T O site plan fourth rendition ata i I spa02 C zev 19,340 a I I I I I 1 7 9 ' 1 1 i 111 111i2_/// 4, I IIII 1 --1[ftly]t.+4 1 1 1 I 1}I' t.- --1- 4 , 2 0 7 (111 1 111111111111- 5 — t• ttVIOc ■••• • V Li. Bon Marche Double tree Inn `.J 1 ■•• . TOYS '51 us g 1s1 1100r 380°0 non:Jima 0295 J ll 1 VI 1111111111111 P- • J 4 ie retail bpace 0 17 na400 22 17 • ty,..c.r., two,. 1 , ri cote* It■titY. 4• 2 •Ion". .-:et•C•i• a/oltn.rf yr,•Ce. I COLE. INC 1 *. •:11.3t I () south elevation non ratall-vaca O west elevation non ratail-sPace MITI michanical fti O typical cross section retail and non-retail buildings ;,.. *:'■ f.7.71.14A • • r ' - II 1 171T - 1 1 1 T I 1 1 111-RATC MORTGAGE ca O north elevation non retail-spaca suspended Ceiling I - light , sheet metal- concrete column cedar shngles—I O east elevation non retail .4 4 typical exterior elevation retail non retail buildings EXHIBIT C PARKWAY SQUARE - HAYDEN ISLAND, INC. --- KITCFLEVOP )e-fo L. ! .21 of CI) oh t.11117:' sheet I I metal r 47777-r7.4 r ; 1 11 i! 0 west elevation riztail space north elevation space -A( *kV" \ I t' 1111- ( , -*e - O south elevation retail spaca east elevation retail space • cedar shingles Ye; j [1 t JT•, :; . 11 ;711 I : I s:c (---txzvel • - _ siding split lace . conc block EXHIBIT D PARKWAY SQUARE-HAYDEN ISLAND, INC. - LC A t • J'I O west elevation TOYS TT US Q north elevation IT US O east elevation S Ti• uS rTh South elevation TOYS uS V e- H 11 1 I ! L_I 1 1 EXHIBIT E PARKWAY SQUARE—HAYDEN ISLAND, INC. 11H1 S "A � City Tukwila Vkl , 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Public Works Department 433 -1850 19oa Mr. Gary Van Dyke Hayden Island Inc. Highway 5 at Jantzen Beach Portland, Oregon 97217 Dear Mr. Van Dyke: June 15, 1979 Parkway Square Project Enclosed for your review and information is a copy of the grading and storm drainage plan for the Parkway Square project as submitted. We draw your attention to two notations on the enclosed plan regarding future widen - ings for roadway. We have determined that, based on future development in the area and traffic growth, a 16 -foot roadway widening has good potential of occurring on Strander Blvd. from Southcenter Parkway to Andover Park West. At this time, we do not see this widening for at least one to three years.. However, recent traffic studies indicate that total traffic flow will be improved at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and Strander Blvd. by the construction of a right -turn lane in northbound Southcenter Parkway. The need for this right -turn lane is immediate. We have, therefore, required that the acceleration and deceleration lanes on Southcenter Parkway for the Parkway Square project, the Doubletree Inn project and the Parkway Place project be constructed in conformance with the 12 -foot widening. We have noted the requirements for the acceleration and deceleration lanes on the enclosed plan. In cases where there is an overlap in the required length of an acceleration and deceleration lane from two driveways, we have shown thefull 12 -foot width as required from driveway to driveway. In the case where there is.no overlap between an accelera- tion and deceleration lane, the City will participate in improving the additional 12- foot lane so in effect, we have a complete new 12 -foot lane from the south curb .line of Strander Blvd. to the south property line of the Parkway Square property. It is my expectation that the City will participate in the full width widening simultane- ously with the building of the acceleration and deceleration lanes. In any event, ultimately the 12 -foot widening will involve the dedication of approximately 7 feet of additional right -of -way on the east side of Southcenter Parkway from the south property line of Strander Blvd. to the south property line of the Hayden Island property. EXHIBIT F PARKWAY SQUARE - HAYDEN ISLAND, INC. Mr. Gary Van Dyke June 15; 1979 Page 2 TRM /dp Thank you for your patience and'concer.n during the review of your access plans. If you have any further questions or if I may be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to call. cc: Mayor Bauch Kjell Stoknes, OCD Director Phil Fraser, Senior Engineer Sincerely, Terence R.' Monaghan, P. Public Works Director li ,7k. 1410 air ate! � .- `�. +i\ Tukwila, Washington Union Pacific A T - ro 1 - 1 --WL) z ' Es - ro 'TAcOm A IWIt-tt- c\I Li 0 rr , cts CO z o < ci 0 Z LL1 V) a_ z0 ow >-> T ro o. T • _J r 10 torn - retail space A 7500P — aJli!1 III1Il, .i;_!IIIIIIeL !iil II 1 + Ilti_ �_' j�lit II i ...y„ ,} . ;f _ I ,..... „i. : � w ig 7 T e l —1 II HIM , II ` i Minim, I ! Ir„ I rt -I I (�� I �=(;- jill`'I 211/ ' i 91 I l l I I I I bii/i v////////////////// 1 I (I I I I I8 \\ \ )z\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\ C� TOYS 'A us B 2J r illlilllilllllll�illlll�' I NCretTY Oa•i7 W 91 61,61 1st floor 38000 mezzanine 10295 if • • • • • • t 22 Z () south elevation non retail-spac F l a 1 1 1 1[ 1 i r1711 II 1 I O west elevation non retail-space typical cross section retail and non-retail buildings yd. O east elevation non retail-spa:a O north elevation non retail-spaoz typical exterior elevation retail non retail buildtngs cbtz„,y 1 l i 1 1 a west elevation retail space O north elevation retail space O east elevation retail space - cedar shingles sheet 4 1 metal d C I 4i : � . / t, is O south elevation retail space S f r II 1d- 1'O gip'— i •u f ii _f --spot face cons block ■ O north elevation TOYS 'A' US O east elevation TOTS 'R US C CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM This questionnaire must be completed and submitted with the application for permit. This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the City of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that the permit is exempt or unless the applicant and Responsible Official previously agree an Environmental Impact Statement needs to be completed. A fee of $50.00 must accompany the filling of the Environmental Questionnaire to cover costs of the threshold determination. I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Hayden Island Inc. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 909 N Tomahawk Island Drive Portland, OR 97217 503 - 283 - 4111 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Tukwila (B.S.I.P.) King Co. (Flood Control Permit) 5. Name of Proposal, if applicable: Parkway Square 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): The proposal consists of 3 retail /office use bldgs. of an approximate 80,000 sq ft and a landscaped parking area for approximately 450 cars on a 7 acre site. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental im- pacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate under- standing of the environmental setting of the proposal): The site is bounded by warehousing /retail, a convention hotel (under construction), and vacant land (iukwila pond) within a commercial /industrial area of Tukwila (Southcenter). The land is a fill of approx. 11 ft. and rises from street grade 4 -5 ft. All storm water to be piped to municipal system. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Sept. 1980 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local): (a) Rezone, conditional use, shoreline permit, etc. YES NO x (b) King County Hydraulics Permit YESx NO (c) Building permit YES NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO x (e) Sewer hook up permit YES x NO (f) Sign permit YES x NO (g) Water hook up permit YES x NO (h) Storm water system permit YES x NO (i) Curb cut permit YES x NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES x NO (1) Other: 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or futher activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No additions beyond those outlined. The protect will be phased construction until Sept 1980. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro= posal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Architectural review, King Co. Hydraulics Permit, others as listed in #9 above. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) 1.. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcover- ing of the soil? (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief fea- tures? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? -2- YES MAYBE NO x x 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or' through interception of an by cuts or excavations? -3- YES MAYBE NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x Explanation: (b) Unconsolidated fill soils under bldg. sites will need to be excavated and replaced for adequate structure bearing. c) Surface regrading of top 2' -3' will be necessary for site drainage. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? x (b) The creation'of objectionable odors? x (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x Explanation: c) Some minimal contribution to change of local climate by increase of heat absorbtion surfaces (paving, roofs, etc.) Negligible to immeasurable effects when compared to overall Southcenter commercial/ industrial development. x x x YES MAYBE NO (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avail- able for public water supplies? Ex b) Paving, bldg. roof, etc. will increase surface runo -decrease perculation. Storm drainage to be piped to municipal system. x Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? x (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X Explanation: Site has pioneering species of no significance growing over fill. Site is surrounded by established commercial /industrial development. x Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds,.land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? s (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? x (d) ,Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ x Explanation: -4- 6. Noise. ill the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: Site in proximity of 1 -5, I -405 freeways, major shopping/ indust ial area. Contribution to noise level negligible. 7. Light an Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? As above #6. Explanation: 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the altera- tion of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: 9. Natural esources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Inc ease in the rate of use of any natural res•urces? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural ressurce? Explanation: Explanat on: 10. Risk of pset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radi- ation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? YES MAYBE NO x x x x 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: 13. Transportation /Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x Explanation: Retail /office complex will generate some . additional vehicular trips in an area designed for commercial /industrial traffic. 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) 'Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? YES MAYBE NO X x x x YES MAYBE NO (f) Other governmental services? x Explanation: 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural _gas? _ (b) Communications systems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? — (f) Solid waste and disposal? _ Explanation: Urban systems exist and are designed for capacity of this site. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea- tion of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: x x Explanation: Explanation: Explanation: CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically of- fensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of exist- ing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological /Histroical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signifi- cant archeological or his- torical site, structure, object or building? I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of non - significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of disclosure on my part. LA, S 1 iNoterl. Signature and Title -8- Date i 'YES MAYBE NO x x x HIGHWAY AT JANTZEN BEACH • Rodger Blaylock, Asst. Planner City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 96188 Dear Mr. Blaylock: Enclosed is a preliminary site plan for negotiations of a reciprocal easement between us and Doubletree Inns. It is our intent to provide a common access point as required by the City of Tukwila. The re- design of Doubletree's and our site plan provides safer access and improves circulation within our site. The areas shown within - the parkway area will be included in the landscape plans for your.review and approval, in conjunction with Architectural Review. You will note also that we have added a left turn lane to our primary lane. Your , . a;rie sq,,��'ur neg ryyJ u i1.it•4works preliminary comments are needed otiations'ean be successfully completed. 9 -") r /4 ti JANTZEN BEACH CENTER JANTZEN BEACH MOORAGE HAYDEN ISLAND MOBILE HOME PARK JANTZEN BEACH VILLAGE APARTMENTS JANTZEN BEACH ICE CENTER PORTLAND, OREGON 97217 • PHONE 283 - 4111 April 20, 1979 Yours truly 1 Gatry '/anDyke Project Engineer 289 -5555 JOINT VENTURES 283 -2444 THUNDERBIRD MOTOR INN AT JANTZEN BEACH (503) 283 -2111 289 -7626 THUNDERBIRD MOTOR INN AT THE QUAY, VANCOUVER, WN. 289 -1621 (503) 289-0303 285 -6601 (503) 285 -4032 PARKER HOUSE RESTAURANT, CAMAS, WN. LID 0.C.D. CO OF lUlclflA APR 2 3 !1973 Sou shopping ceiiter picente Union Pacific vicinity map Tukwila, Washington Benaroya'S Parkway DIVID Ae s HICKMAN 22 May '79 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of:Tukwila 6200 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Satterstrom: RE: Revised design review submittal PARKWAY SQUARE DEVELOPMENT At the request of the TOYS "R" US store, we would like to make some minor changes to.the proposal. SITE PLAN: We would like to add some additional parking along the North of building "B ", and move the parking on the West side of TOYS "R" US, into the parking lot to the West. This will provide for better package pick -up. BUILDING ELEVATIONS: TOYS "R" US, would like to reduce the wood fascia. around their building. They feel the proportions are better than the one submitted earlier. Enclosed find revised drawings. If there are any questions please call me. Yours truly, AVID L. HICKMAN AIA DLH:sh enclosures 12200 N. Jantzen Dr. Suite 450 Portland, Or. 97217 285-2256 Transportation Engineering & Planning Consultants May 4, 1979 Mr. Gary Van Dyke, Project Engineer Hayden Island, Inc. Highway 5 at Jantzen Beach Portland, OR 97217 SUBJECT: PARKWAY SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER, TUKWILA Dear Gary: Per your request, we have reviewed the site plan for the subject project relative to traffic access, internal circulation and parking. A copy of the site plan is enclosed reflecting our comments and suggestions. Based upon our experience with the types of activities anticipated for Parkway Square, we estimate that the project at full development will generate about 4,000 vehicle trips per day -- 2,000 entering and 2,000 exiting (annual average weekday). Traffic will of course vary considerably by season of the year. Trip generation rates by store will vary from 10 trips /day per 1000 square fet of gross floor area (GFA) for the furniture store to 65 /day /1000 ft GFA for Toys R Us (based upon Jafco store experience). During the afternoon commuter peak hour, about 200 cars will enter the site and 200 cars will exit. On Saturdays, a mid - daypeak hour of 300 vehicles entering and about 250 exiting can be anticipated. We anticipate that the majority of traffic will approach from the north as a result of the freeway and arterial access to the vicinity. Hence, the north access drive will be fairly significant to the repeat customers of Toys RU's. The south entrance, as the main entrance, will of course attract the more occasional customers of Toys RU's, and will be the primary access for all customers of Buildings C and D and for all traffic approaching from the south. We estimate the main entrance to accommodate about two- thirds of the total site traffic, and the north entrance to accommodate about one - third. Left - turning exit traffic will predominantly use the south exit; hence, a left -turn exit lane is highly desirable on this drive. A rough estimate of peak hour traffic movements at the two access drives is illustrated • as follows: TN■ents -three 148th A.enue Southeast • Bellevue, Washington 98007 • (206) 641 -3881 TRAFISPO *Excluding Double Tree Inn Traffic. 41 Mr. Gary Van Dyke, Project Engineer Page Two _r\o, TRAIM This "boils down" to less than 2 vehicles per minute for any of the separate access or egress movements. The proposed site access should operate quite satisfactorily under these conditions. There is no possibility of signalization warrants at either access drive. With building shopes and locations as a "given", a totally satisfactory internal circulation and parking plan cannot be achieved. We are particularly concerned about the parking on the sides and rear of Buildings B anc C which is unattractive to normal customer use. On the other hand, in light of the seasonal variation expected for Toys R.Us, we feel the front and side parking will serve the site customer volumes for 10 months of the year or more. The parking to the rear of Building D can be viewed as overflow parking for Toyes R Us during the pre /post- Christmas shopping peaks. A sign noting "Additional Parking in Rear" might be placed on the northwest corner of Building D during these seasonal peaks to help avoid excessive customer circulation in search of parking. A definite aesthetic "plus" for this rear parking results from having less parking area expanse presented to view of the site from Southcenter Parkway. Given all the site layout constraints, we feel the access and circulation plan is about as good as can be achieved. We do, however, have a few concerns and suggestions for improvements as noted below and on the enclosed site plan. 1. The left -turn opportunity immediately inside the main entrance poses a potential hazard to Southcenter Parkway. An entering vehicle attempting a left -turn could be frequently blocked by exiting traffic queues. It would.in turn block other entering traffic, causing possible blockages out onto Southcenter Parkway. We suggest widening the entrance drive to a sufficient dimension (22 to 24') to allow entering traffic to bypass a left- turning vehicle. 2. The angle parking off the main entrance drive poses additional conflicts and blockages for entering traffic volumes. We are not as concerned about the effects on exiting traffic. We suggest replacing the median with a raised curb only along the north edge to provide a wider entrance drive to reduce conflicts with parking maneuvers. A painted guideline as shown on the plan would help delineate thru traffic from the parking traffic. Mr. Gary Van Dyke, Project Engineer Page Three James W. MacIsaac, P.E. Principal Enclosure - Revised Site Plan T R A NSP O 3. The misalignment of north -south and east -west circulation drives at the front corners of Buildings B and D also cause confusion and potential hazard. We suggest provision of STOP signs and painted STOP bars on three of the four approaches at this inter- section, giving right -of -way to entering traffic. 4. The north access drive and circulation road should be provided with a dashed yellow centerline, curving into the north -south drive along the front of Toys R Us to follow the main traffic flow path and to designate right -of -way. All other approaches to this drive, including those from Double Tree, should be provided with STOP signs and bars. 5. To preserve the safety and integrity of the north access drive, The Double Tree parking layout should be modified to eliminate circulation from bay to bay out into the access drive (see enclosed site plan). This will be particularly important if Double Tree access and parking activity is substantial on this portion of its site. 6. Directional arrows should be placed on the pavement at each end of the one -way circulation aisles to help prevent wrong way traffic patterns. STOP bars on the pavement may be desirable at the ends of each parking aisle to promote safety appearence for site insurance purposes. Gary, I hope these comments and suggestions will be helpful to you in finalizing the site plan. If you have any questions or further needs relative to this project, please give me a call. Very truly yours, The TRANSPO Group (. DAVI HICKMA May 7, 1979 Mr. Fred N. Satterstrom Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila 6200 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Satterstrom: I am representing the develop on a development in Tukwila. of the Tukwila board of Archi is presented to fulfill our o The project consists of a 7.1 warehouses on South Center Pa Square', and will be construc The development will consist building of 38,000 sq. ft. pl "R" Us' , retail store. Two b ft. and 19,760 sq. ft., for a free standing building to the retail space. The site contains access for Doubletree Hotel. This will which would have been require two truck loading docks on th parking spaces. With 86,655 400 gross sq. ft., requires p non - retail commercial @ 3.10 requires 24 spaces. Total pa rs, Hayden Island, Inc., of Portland Oregon, We are requesting to be included on the agenda ectural Review of May 24th. This application ligation under title - 18, chapter 18.32.040. acre site just north of the Bon March'e kway. The project will be called 'Parkway ed in 1979 - 1980 period. f 94,155 sq. ft. in four structures. One s 10,295 sq. ft. mezzanine will house 'Toys ildings to the siouth will contain 18,600 sq. total of 86,655 sq. ft. of retail space. The northwest will contain 7,500 sq. ft. of non- rucks through a joint access with the new liminate one access to South Center Parkway, to this site. The TRU building will have east side of the building. There are 418 q. ft. of gross retail space @ 1 space for rking of 217 spaces. 7,500 sq. ft. of gross paces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, king required is 241 spaces. 12200 N. Jantzen Dr. Sui e 450 Portland, Or. 97217 285-2256 May 7, 1979 page 2 The auto access and parking circulation was developed with the services of Traffic Engineer, James W. Mac Isaac P.E. of Transpo Group. Enclosed are site plans, and elevations of the structures. Also enclosed is Hayden Island, Inc. submittal for binding site improvement plan, environ- mental checklist and a check for $50.00, required for application. Please let us know at what time our review will be. If there are any questions or additional information needed please let me know. Respectfully, DLH:sh enclosures AVID L. HICKMAN AIA • • . aNritica, '3N1 'ONV1S1 N3CIAIN . . ••• ••. • • • 77.1 • - • • •••• Jr. ... • - . 118... • . • 2...W.P .:".72*• . • _ • es. as *$ ammo 1111M NAM WI 1•1 . mums an sumo+ S113111311_1114 3111 VVICOSSV ILINSallal cai ikrs • - — - • r. 4 • : i I I • ' I : ‘.1 ;••=4•::::.et...•....Z.:7-:=:' - February 7, 1979 DESCRIPTION: Parcels 3 and 4 of Short Plat No. 77 -51 recorded under Recording No. 771013 -0634 being a short plat of: That portion of the Southeast It of the Northwest 1 g of Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Order No. 640487 Beginning at the monumented intersection of the centerlines of Southcenter Parkway (57th Avenue South) and Strander Boulevard, (South 164th Street) thence South 89 ° 45'58" East along the monumented centerline of said Strander Boulevard, a distance of 325.05 feet; thence South 0 ° 25'58" East parallel with the monumented. East line of said subdivision, a distance of 30.00 feet to an inter- section with the South margin of said Strander Boulevard, and the true point of beginning of the herein described tract; thence continuing South 0°25'58" East, a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 89 ° 45'58" East parallel with said centerline of Strander Boulevard, a distance of 350.00 feet to the monumented East line of said subdivision; thence South 0 ° 25'58" East along said East line a distance of 1093.20 feet to the monumented Southeast corner of said subdivision; thence North 89 ° 43'19" West along the monumented South line of said subdivision a distance of 626.81 feet to the East margin of said Southcenter Parkway; thence North 0 ° 57'48" West along said East margin a distance of 1241.85 feet to a point of curve; thence Northerly and Easterly along the arc of a curve to the right said curve having a radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 91 ° 11'50" a distance of 79.58 feet to the South margin of said Strander Bouldvard; thence South 89 East along said South margin, a distance of 237.72 feet to the true point•of beginning; The aforementioned monumentation established by the City of Tukwila under L.I.D. No. 13, Contract No. 2 -68, Sht. 1 of 19, Street Plan and Profile; Situate in the County of King, State of Washington. ■ __... , . ., • , : ,.... 5: :II r .... DE - ..17. ...-• •.14. .., o' 9 ••,..! z 1 ‘:.,..± ZS r....± t ).. ' b..‘,14. 1 10,3:20 _ — 0 • • .ul •-2- I kfl 0 u". ,-- .- 0 N tr. I • 11/4 {,/,...• • r . .•Tvo;t •A•ov.■ 5,... ". ftel 0:1 • • • '113.1. . I .. • -... Li) I ( - 5;.; 1 7. 53' F. 1.71:1•L -' i I -.4 . PTV. tl IVh7":7 1 Z+1:. 47. 10 1 r . t. ...:3)0..... . : ° I . i 1 1`,. i A ▪ , • PARC*L 1 ,, ;) . 1. ''.FT. .... . • . -I '1; Al ,.. rt., c_ ,er ."-% ... t _J %...5 _ .... 7.36:12 • 7. X 1 . p .0. 5 . TI s.D c- T.anf? Certificatz:±: ••• - 0 2. - PARCEL. fl 3r..,±„.±.A1 5OUThCEI•rrEN 7:•14‘.`/.4"( This sort pZat: correctly represents a mude by Fie or under 7.711 direction in ccInfoc:, with the reguirom.?nts of site. 71 ••"" . • • • I- 2.. S . WO. - - - - .4.. 0 . PARCEt_ EL c•q•rr. 0 cD 2 4 .- - rFnEw _ i p 250.o5 51 fh Ave. 7.)o.) • ••• • r ,4 1 T. 1 PV. • -- .7r) Map on File in Vault Direction: Scale:* 5 • • • ••••••••• • • • ..- • •••••,•