HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit DR-12-78 - BENAROYA - OFFICE BUILDING LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ZONING REVIEWdr-12-78
17501 southcenter parkway
benaroya office building
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
June 29, 1979
.I:
Mr. Kjell Stoknes
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
In accord with your memorandum of June 27, 1979, the Jack A.
Benaroya Company does hereby commit to perform the following:
1. Plant trees similar to the street frontage trees,
on the Levitz property line at 25' on center before.
October 31, 1979.
All landscaped areas have been beauty barked since your inspection.
obert H. Fehnel
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.'.
6200 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila Washington 98188
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
MEMORANDUM
TO: FILE (Benaroya Office Building)
FROM: Kjell Stoknes
DATE: 27 June 1979
e f SUBJECT: Landscape Plan, Zoning Review COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Today I inspected the Benaroya Office Building for land-
scaping and zoning compliance to B.A.R. and city codes.
The following conclusions are drawn:
1. The 25' landscape area width along Southcenter Park-
way is not met in areas where there is a turn -out
lane or at the bus stop.
DECISION: The turn -out lane and bus stop are a public
benefit to the project and the area. Some of the area
being on private property. The landscape width in
these areas is ±15 feet and appears to look the same
as where it is 25 feet wide. This is approved as
meeting the B.A.R. intent.
2. The southwest property line was to have property line
trees approximately 25 feet on center. There has been
placed an evergreen hedge in this area ±four feet on
center. This hedge will grow 6 - 10 feet high.
DECISION: While being a substantial and dense planting,
it does not provide future high growth trees intended to
visually minimize the bulk effect of the building. The
owner is required to, in addition to the hedge, plant
property line trees similar in type and size to the
street frontage trees by October 31, 1979.
3. All the landscaped areas are not beauty barked.
DECISION: All landscape areas are to be beauty barked
by July 30, 1979.
I will approve the project for planning and zoning if I can
get a letter of commitment from Benaroya Company on the
above.
coPlt g-Pe-IP per agia•lia 74.k_
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
16 November 1978 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM V E Landscaping Plan: Parkway Plaza Buildi.na
Mr. Robert Fehnel of the Jack Benaroya Company has submitted a landscaping
plan for the Parkway Plaza Building. The applicant has submitted two sets
of landscaping drawings. The first set.(Exhibit 1) attempts to comply with
the specific requirements imposed by the Planning Commission at their regular
May meeting. The second set of. plans (Exhibit 2) presents the landscaping
treatment that the Benaroya Company wishes to use on the site. Each plan
is reviewed as per the requirements imposed by the Planning Commission.
(SEE; Exhibit 3) Mr. Fehnal has submitted a cover letter explaining why
certain conditions cannot be met (SEE, Exhibit 4).
FACTS:
1. The building has been enlarged to include a full basement, which required
an additional 49 parking spaces.
2. Approximately one - fourth of all parking area has already been paved.
This parking lot is located south of the building.
3. The site plan turning pattern for the main entrance is not correct.
There is no through traffic. A right turn south and left turn north
are permitted.
4. A traffic light will not be installed because traffic warrants cannot
be met.
The following is an anlysis of proposed plans (Plans 1 and 2) and the stipu-
lations unposed by the Planning Commission at their regular May meeting:
Stipulation 1: Relocate parking indicated in northeast or southeast corner
of the site to the vacant northwest area near the rail line; this will pro-
vide approximately 100,000 square feet of vacant land abutting Southcenter
Parkway for commercial development.
Analysis: Plan 1 - The applicant has complied with this requirement.
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Stipulation 2: Provision of sidewalks along entire frontage of Southcenter
Parkway and both sides of main entrance road. Also, provision of sidewalks
alo ;Igwest side of the north -south internal roadway.
Planning Commission
Staff Report
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Stipulation 3 A: Live groundcover of all landscape areas.
Analysis: Plan 1 - The applicant has complied with this requirement.
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Page 2
16 November 1978
Analysis: Plan 1 - :\ six (6) foot sidewalk has been provided along Southcenter
Parkway and a five (5) foot sidewalk along the north -south internal roadway.
However, the plans presented show only one six (6) foot sidewalk along the
north side of the main entrance road. This seems to serve opposite purposes
when considering that the majority of the potential pedestrian traffic could
be generated from the bus stop which is on the south side of the entrance road.
Stipulation 3 B: Trees along Southcenter Parkway and major internal drives to
be of a complementary mix of evergreen and deciduous, each of 3-inch caliper,
minimum, and situated in clusters no more than 30 -feet apart.
Analysis: Plan 1 - The trees along Southcenter Parkway are not necessarily a
complementary mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees, however, they are spaced
correctly. Deciduous trees line Southcenter Parkway, except at the entrance
where evergreen trees are used. In the fall and winter the four (4) foot berm
with cistus and junipers will create site screening of the parking lots. The
three evergreen trees on the south side of the main entrance might create a site
clearance problem, if placed improperly. Care should be taken so that a car will
not have to pull out into the crosswalk to be able to see traffic. The applicant
has not placed trees along the internal north -south roadway with a minimum sepa-
ration of 30 feet; however, he demonstrates that it is possible in
plan #2. There is no indication that the trees are of a minimum 3 -inch caliper.
Plan 2 - Provides the required spacing for trees along the internal
north -south roadway. The other portions of this requirement are fulfilled the
same as plan 1.
Stipulation 3 C: Trees provided around the building of 3 -inch caliper, minimum.
Analysis: Plan 1 - Notes on the landscaping plans are inadequate to establish
compliance with this stipulation.
Plan 2 - Same as above.
Stipulation 3 D: Provision of outside sitting or sack -lunch area near the build-
ing for use by employees.
Analysis: Plan 1 - An outside "seating area" has been provided. The seating
area is not very large, however, considering that 1500 or more employees will
eventually occupy the building.
Stipulation 3 E: Provision of deciduous trees at intervals of every five parking
stalls in all parking areas, in a manner as depicted on the above- referenced land-
scape plan.
Planning Commission
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Analysis: Plans 1 and 2
Plan 2 - Same as plan 1.
Page 3
Staff Report 16 November 1978
Analysis: Plan 1 - Plan 1 complies with this requirement. However, disagree-
ment with this requirement is a major reason why the applicant has submitted a
second set of plans.
Plan 2 - Plan 2 does not comply with above stipulation. The land-
scape architect disagrees with the specific required treatment of the landscap-
ing for the parking lot. The intent is to screen the parking and blend the
building into the natural hillside from observation points along Southcenter
Parkway. The proposal appears to fulfill this intent but does not offer syste-
matic shade to employee parking area, as plan 1 does.
Stipulation 3 F: Automatic irrigation along major landscape corridors and areas
of landscape concentration.
Analysis: Plan 1 - The requirement is being fulfilled. The automatic irrigation
system was shown on the utility plans included in the building permit application.
Stipulation 3 G: Submittal of revised landscape plan incorporating above stipula-
tions to Planning Commission for review at the regular June 1978 meeting.
1. On May 31st, the applicant was advised to submit revised landscaping
plans incorporating the desired revision for review at the regular
June meeting.
2. The applicant was informed by certified mail on August 25, 1978 to sub-
mit landscape plans by September 14, 1978 for regular September meeting.
3. The applicant informed the Planning Division on September 14, .1978 that
they would submit the plans on approximately October 1, 1978 for the
regular October meeting.
4. The applicant submitted a complete set of landscaping plans on 7 November
1978.
Stipulation 3 H: Provision of 25 -foot wide landscaping strip along Southcenter
Parkway; same to be bermed 4 feet in height.
Analysis: Plan 1 - The plans submitted show a 15 -foot strip in lieu of a 25 -foot
strip. Eventhough the berm creates the majority of site screening, the require-
ment is not met.
Stipulation 4: The entire hillside .lying west of the rail line shall remain
undisturbed.
Analysis: Plans 1 and 2 - No development is proposed or intended west of the
rail line; therefore, the stipulation is complied with.
Planning Commission �
Staff Report
RECOMMENDATION:
Page 4
16 November 1978
The majority of the evidence indicates that approval of the landscaping plan for
the Parkway Plaza Building should be approved as presented in the drawings dated
31 October 1978 only if the following are met:
1. That a 25 -foot wide landscaping strip be provided along Southcenter
Parkway; the same to be bermed 4 feet in height.
2. That a sidewalk a minimum of 5 feet in width be provided on the south
side of the entrance road.
3. The trees on the north and south side of the access road shall be set
back to provide a minimum of 500 feet site distance clearance without
extending the vehicle into the crosswalk.
4. That the landscaping be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permit,
5. The entire hillside lying west of the rail line shall remain undisturbed.
6. Approval of site and landscape plans for the Parkway Plaza Building
shall not be construed as approval of any plans in that area designated
as "Future Development."
September 14, 1978
6 ) 44.-4.
Robert H. Fehnel
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
grP
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attention: Office of Community Development
Mr. Roger Blaylock
401;kiVEll
fi SEP 14 1978
CITY OF TUKWILA
This letter is in response to your letter of August 24, 1978, regarding our resubmission
of a site plan for the Parkway Plaza Building.
We wish to advise you that I did attend the May meeting and did make objections to certain
aspects of the plan.
We are currently working with two restaurants for placement along Southcenter Parkway and
expect we will have sufficient general site information to assure of their integration
into the overall plan.
We shall submit this to your department on approximately 10/1/78 for your review and
comments, and for resubmission, if necessary, to the Planning Commission.
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
SENT TO
y �„ I _ K O � �
p,,POSTMARK
OR DATE
„(�
STREET AND NO.
S % — (.P Q�.a
____
., STATE AND ZIP CODE
�� 5'810
'Cr
OPTIONAL SE FOR ADDITIONAL FEES
RETURN 1, Shows to whom and date delivered 154
RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 654
2. Shows to whom, date and where delivered , 354
SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850
DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d
SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)
z
ro
C
0
PS Form . 3800
Apr. 1971
— 1 1 :,'SENDERi ;Completea "=:;a
:rAdd your sddtesit in ahe ETTIRAS;:TO'
1 ;The followtn� service is requested (check one
e Show whom and.date del
Shoe to whoiil • and ;address :of; • delive
C`Show to whom and'` dateidetiver
RESTRICTED DELIVERY
Show to whom date, and address of delivery.
(CONSULT.; POSTMASTER FOR FEES).
;.(Alwsye obtain slanatu►e.of ;iddeaasaa'.or.SKei
I haiye received. . the ;artiele'desetibed
, SIGNAT RE ❑ 'Addressee 0 Authortz` d. ages
DEIIYER
UC 5 177
5. .-ADDRESS .(Complete on y: it requeete
G O�i'r9 == 0-234 - 337'
•
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIj --30(4 (plus postage) ,?
•7
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side)
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL * OPO: 1971 0 - 960 -763
PARKS 6
RECREATION
PLANNING
BUILDING
24 August 1978
Mr. Robert Fehnel
The Benaroya Company
5960 - 6th Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98109
RE: Benaroya Office Building
Dear Mr. Fehnel:
RJB /ch
t
Sincerely,
'► c
Roger J. Blaylock
Assistant Planner
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
cc: 0.C.D. Dir., Plan. Sup., Bldg. Off.
6230 Southconter Boulevard n Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 242 -2177
The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular May meeting, completed the
site plan review of the Benaroya Office Building located on Southcenter Park-
way (minutes attached). On May the 31st, a letter was . sent to you informing
you of the conditions imposed by the Tukwila Planning Commission (letter
attached). Since there was no objection by yourself to the staff report or
the final motion of the Planning Commission at that meeting, it was assumed
that the site plan submitted for the building permit would reflect those
conditions.
At the present time, the site plan has not been approved. The building
permit specifically states that the site plan is not approved and is sub-
ject to revision. Recognizing the fact that letter of May 31st may not have
reached your attention, we will accept a revised site plan and landscaping plan
if submitted prior to Thursday, September 14th. These plans will then be
reviewed at the regular September meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission
at 8:00 P.M. on the 28th.
If you do not wish to submit plans which comply with the Planning Commission's
conditions, then you must submit a letter asking for reconsideration of the
site and landscaping plans. In either case we must receive notice of your
decision in writing prior to 5:00 P.M. on Thursday, September 14th. Failure
to respond by this time could force administrative action which would possibly
delay occupancy of the structure.
SENT CERTIFIED MAIL
c--
PLANNING
BUILDING
PARKS S
RECREATION
31 May 1978
Mr. Bob Fehnel
The Benaroya Company
5950 - 6th Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98109
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6230 Southcenter Boulevard s Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (206) 242 -2177
RE: Benaroya Office Building
Dear Mr. Fehnel:
The Tukwila Planning Commission, at its regular May meeting, completed review
of the above- referenced project.
The Commission, carrying out its obligations under section 18.60.035 of the
Tukwila Municipal Code, approved the revised site plan dated 10 May 1978 and
the elevation drawings with the following stipulations:
1. Relocate parking indicated in northeast or southeast corner of the
site to the vacant northwest area near the rail line; this will
provide approximately 100,000 square feet of vacant land abutting
Southcenter Parkway for commercial development.
2. Provision of sidewalks along entire frontage of Southcenter Park-
way and both sides of main entrance road. Also, provision of side-
walks along west side of the north -south internal roadway.
3. The landscape plan dated 15 May 1978 be approved with the following
stipulations:
a. Live groundcover of all landscape areas;
b. Trees along Southcenter Parkway and major internal drives to
be of a complementary mix of evergreen and deciduous, each of
3 -inch caliper, minimum, and situated in clusters no more than
30 -feet apart;
c. Trees provided around the building of 3 -inch caliper, minimum;
d. Provision of outside sitting or sack -lunch area near the build-
ing for use by employees;
Provision of deciduous trees at intervals of every five parking
stalls in all parking areas, in a manner as depicted on the above -
referenced landscape plan;
Mr. Bob Fehnel
The Benaroya Co.
4. The entire hillside lying west of the rail line shall remain undisturbed.
Drawings submitted for building permit should reflect these provisions. Should
you have any questions please call.
Sincer
GC /ch
g•
Gary Crut field
Assistant Planner
cc: Assoc Plnr
Page 2
31 May 1978
f. Automatic irrigation along major landscape corridors and areas of
landscape concentrations;
Submittal of revised landscape plan incorporating above stipula-
tions to Planning Commission for review at the regular June 1978
meeting;
. Provision of 25 -foot wide landscape strip along Southcenter Park-
way; same to be bermed 4 feet in height.
Planning Commission
Minutes
Page 4
25 May 1978
the City should do likewise. Binding assignment of the development plan to the
land seems adequate. As to review of detailed plans, each phase must be reviewed
by the Planning Commission only after City Council action regarding this recommen-
dation for reclassification.
Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARING: REZONE, R -3 and C -1 to R -4 (Ehmke -Kato)
Motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to table the hearing
on this matter until environmental review has been completed.
BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
evelopment Plans: Benaro.ya Office Building (continued)
Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report and explained the revised drawings. Distri-
buted and read the revised staff recommendation in response to the recently revised
plans. Mr. Bob Fehnel, representing applicant, explained the potential for a
restaurant to be located at the southeast corner of the area rather than the north-
east.
Mr. Crutchfield also pointed out that the landscape plan should indicate a minimum
landscape strip along Southcenter Parkway of 15 feet and staff recommends that it
be bermed. ir. Fehnel noted his agreement.
Mr. Richards asked if the traffic problems associated with the proposed develop-
ment have been resolved. Mr. Fehnel explained they are working with the Depart-
ment of Public Works as well as consulting traffic engineers to resolve the details.
Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mrs. Avery and carried to approve the site plan
dated 10 May 1978 and elevation drawings with the following stipulations:
1. Relocate parking indicated in northeast or southeast corner of the site
to the vacant northwest area near the rail line; this will provide approx-
imately 100,000 square feet of vacant land abutting Southcenter Parkway .
for commercial development.
2. Provision of sidewalks along entire frontage of Southcenter Parkway and
both sides of_main entrance road. Also, provision of sidewalks along
west side of the north -south internal roadway.
3. The landscape plan dated 15 May 1978 be approved with the following
stipulations:
a. Live groundcover of all landscape areas;
b. Trees along Southcenter Parkway and major internal drives to be of
a complementary mix of evergreen and deciduous, each of 3 -inch cali-
per, minimum, and situated in clusters no more than 30 -feet apart;
c. Trees provided around the building of 3 -inch caliper, minimum;
Planning Commission
Minutes
d. Provision of outside sitting or sack -lunch area near the building
for use by employees;
e. Provision of deciduous trees at intervals of every five parking
stalls in all parking areas, in a manner as depicted on the above -
referenced landscape plan;
f. Automatic irrigation along major landscape corridors and areas
of landscape concentrations;
Submittal of revised landscape plan incorporating above stipula-
tions to Planning Commission for review at the regular June 1978
meeting;
h. Provision of 25 -foot wide landscape strip along Southcenter Park-
way; same to be bermed 4 feet in height.
g.
Page 5
25 May 1978
4. The entire hillside lying west of the rail line shall remain undisturbed.
Development Plans: Project #761 (Segale Business Park)
Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the site and elevation drawings.
Mr. Lance Mueller, architect, stated his agreement with the proposed conditions.
Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to approve the plans
with the following stipulations:
1. Detailed landscape plan to complement the adjacent development be approved
by Planning Commission priorto issuance of Occupancy Permit.
2. Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment.
3. The landscape plan shall include provision of sidewalk to complement
adjacent developments.
Landscape Plan: Phase II & III (Southcenter Corporate Square)
Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report and explained the materials and manner
of landscaping.
Motion by Mr. Bowen, seconded by Mr. Sowinski and carried to approve the land-
scape plans as presented.
Landscape Plan: Parking Lot (Southcenter Corporate Square)
£lr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the materials and manner of
landscape. Also noted the staff recommendation regarding relocation of the
curb cut.
Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to approve the land-
scape plan with the notation that the revised curb cut location should be at least
250 feet from the centerline of Andover Park West.
to
•
25 May 1978
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM V A • Development Plans: Benaroya Office Building (continued)
The Planning Commission, at its regular April meeting, approved the location
of the :proposed structure and directed that site details be worked out with-
in sixty (60) days.
An Environmental Impact Statement has been required to be prepared but is
unavailable as yet. Since the fundamental issue before the Commission regard -
ing this proposal (its height) was decided on 27 April 1978, Staff recom-
mends approval of the site plan and elevations with the following stipulations:
1. Revise the general parking layout to provide north -south internal channel -
ization to correspond with Public Works requirements with respect to
ingress /egress at Southcenter Parkway.
2. Relocate parking indicated in northeast corner of the site to the vacant
northwest area near the rail line; this will provide ±100,000 square feet
of vacant land abutting Southcenter Parkway for commercial development.
3. Provide 25 -foot wide landscape strip along Southcenter Parkway; same to
be bermed 4 feet in height.
4. Detailed landscape plan must be reviewed by the Planning Commission within
60 days to include the following:
a. live groundcover of all landscape areas;
b. landscape delineation, 5 -foot minimum width, of parking area
perimeter;
c. trees along Southcenter Parkway and major internal drives to be of a
complementary mix of evergreen and deciduous, each of 3 -inch caliper,
minimum, and situated in clusters no more than 30 feet apart;
d. trees provided around the building of 2 -inch caliper, minimum;
e. automatic irrigation.
5. The entire hillside lying west of the rail line shall remain undisturbed.
.-
OFFICE
EiLIII-DING
_
•■••,......■ 71../001.1.••••■•••••I
1.4CIC A. DEVAROYA COMPANY
OP...a ••■•••••■•■•■•• . ■■•■•■••■■•
••••■••■•••■ ...•••■••••••• ar.......... woo •■••■• abo ■■•••
w • IP O. • • && • II. I ■■•
./.••••■■••■•■•■•■•••••■
Oa** •••• ••••••• Mt.,*
•••■
v•••■•ra.I.*.a.......
....A...
al
•
0 •
2
• •
• -
b
• • •
4 Is
0 •
1 3 •
P:
r -
• 7
• ..
NMI
111•111
ir111
MIN
MI MI
MB MI
r
al
.1:1 .1
Alm IN
......
......... • is Ill
allik .41111111111111INI MI a
IIIIIIIII. 411111111111•1• MI NI
111111111611111111.111111M11111 III IN III
IIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIN MI NI
mg Eliming . •
immir minum. III
..
goo INIIIIIIIIIIMIIIII1111111111 IN • •
III• 11.11111111111•11111111 III
MIMI 11111111111111111111 III rl l a
MIN 11111111■1111111111 MI III MI
NNW `MIIIIIIIIIMMIIIN MI NI 111
MEW ' NI NI II III
imir 411111111111111 III MI NI •
'NMI= MI III • II NI
'gIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
NIIIII11111111111111
INNEN
MI — In ow an NE
or
mow imi
No am on ri
Nu No am ffirt ..
.. _ INN
NM INII MI MI
MI
MINE
=
AMU IIN MI 111. 11.
I INN
MINI
MIN
MIN IIN OM
own
MIMI
l a
MI NM MN NI
...
MI NMI MI
MI MN MI
MN MN MI
NM MI MI
MI NM MI
M MI MI
1 • I I I II N . .
NI li
a NI
a NI
NI m
1 IN py.
s ile
on I
me
NE
NI mow EN EN AN EN Iml i
rim r ir r no. um
E
ing MI NM
NO
am
MN on NM
EIMI ME
1
MN
IN
INIII MIll
UN MI •
NMI SIM
II M MN MI NM
1 11111111 MI MI 2 =
MINI MI
3!!
.4
EAST ELEVATION
HI 111 1. 1.114111111
•1111■81/10ff
.1.1. 4..01 OOOOO I.
••■ ■■••••••••
, —
a••••-**•••••••••
CITY of TUKWILA
14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067
,•TO: Kj01 Stoknes
FROM Mayor:. Ed Bauch f
DATE: May 18, 1978
SUBJECT :. Policy,Decision -
':This memo is to confirm verbal' discussion we had in response to a memo from you
-to me on same subject dated May 16, "!:1978:
It is wise to discuss the delivery of municipal services when reviewing the impact
-Of a proposed project. 'It comes under the general term of environmental impact, but
in this case, :it:-is. the economic impact rather than the physical environment. Mitiga-
tion of this economic impact is handled much different from that of a physical impact.
The first item of:consideration is that of scale. ';What is the scale of this project
to the total economic environment of the City of Tukwila? If this project were to be
.built in Algona or. Pacific, then a significant .impact would be considered. The
second item is of. timing. Which comes first,. the services or the project? If we
had required the services, Southcenter would never have been built.
.The question of increased police or fire service is an administrative and political
'process. The department head identifies a problem area, states the needs, and then
justifies the increase in head count and budget to the mayor. The mayor evaluates
.and makes recommendations to.the City Council. The City Council appropriates. This
.process is independent of individual projects. How well a jurisdiction responds
within this system dictates how -many developers are willing to build within the.
jurisdiction.
My instructions to'you are that you are to process - a project based on existing
ordinances and codes. Department heads who feel .they have a problem then. should
attempt to have those ordinances and codes changed within the political process.
- you will have met your obligation as a responsible official by bringing this
..,matter to my attention.. '
: :'.EDB /mb
Chief Hubert - Crawley
Chief John-Sheets
MEMORANDU
M
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
18 May 1978
Jack A. Benaroya Company
5950 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, WA 98108
ATTN: Robert H. Fehnel
Gary Crutchfield
Assistant Planner
GC /ch
cc: Dir, OCD
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: Parkway Plaza Office Building
Dear Mr. Fehnel:
Thank you for providing the deed information regarding the land involved in
the above- referenced project.
After review of the new information, it is the conclusion of this office
that division of the subject .land area was accomplished prior to the effec-
tive date of our Subdivision Code. The subject land area, therefore, does
not require further division to accommodate the proposed development.
Again, thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 292 -2177
P(Leta c-ta its?iA„j SM;j1, fi 74 aNtet tto - 10 fv-f d � , -YL V
� '�/ i� rP-�� 4r) 5 � f ,
7/�
5u 0 dl,60--?;)(7 erne ��e 14e,d itpx .6(j 4
\ /446,4 •
r.
PARKS' 3
P.EC= ::HT(
2. Air:
C
CITY of TUK VELA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
4 May 1978
. MEMORANDUM
TO: Kieli Stoknes, Dire. tor, OCD
FROM: Gary Crutchfiel.v '- s'stant Planner
SUBJECT: THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Benaroya Office Building
6230 Southcanter Boulevard D Tukwila, Washington 98188 n (208) 242 -2177
Initial review of the Environmental Checklist submitted for the above - referenced
project has revealed the following findings and conclusions.
FINDINGS:
1. Earth:
The soils analysis by Dames & Moore indicates the minimum construction
measures necessary to achieve a foundation which will settle between 2 -inch
to 12 inches. The report further recommends imported fill be used due to
the wet nature of existing soils. Also, the report recommends a "supple-
mentary exploration program" be accomplished prior to construction.
The Checklist Appendix indicates the indirect effect of the traffic generated
by this project, that is, an increase in the carbon monoxide level.
3. Water:
Approximately 9 acres of the site will be covered by impervious surfaces.
The soils report indicates the presence of groundwater.
4. Flora:
The proposed construction is essentially void of vegetation. The hillside
to the rear of the proposed structure is heavily vegetated and is designated
on the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Map of Ordinance #986. The height of
the proposed structure will cause shadows to be cast on this hillside during
morning hours.
Memorandum
Kjell Stoknes
Page 2
4 May 1978
5. Fauna:
The proposed construction site is essentially void of wildlife habitat; there-
fore, wildlife is essentially non - existent. The hillside, due to its signifi-
cant vegetation, offers a viable habitat for fauna.
6. Noise:
The checklist acknowledges that noise will increase but fails to address the
matter. Existing noise levels are anticipated to increase primarily due to
associated vehicular traffic, especially during peak traffic hours.
7. Light /Glare:
Lighting will increase as a result of interior and exterior building lighting,
parking lot lighting and (possibly) building signing. The extent of such in-
crease is unidentified.
8. Land Use:
The proposal represents a dramatic departure from the established character
of surrounding development, both structurally and functionally.
Comprehensive Plan policies (Policy 3 of Objective 1 and Policy 2 of Objective
4, Commerce /Industry Element) promote compatability in bulk of structures,
specifically their height. Surrounding development does not exceed the typical
35' height limit. The proposed structure is 133 feet in height.
The location of the proposed office structure is in the heart of an area iden-
tified by the Checklist Appendix as having "high regional commercial drawing
power ". Further the Comprehensive Plan promotes "Commercial" use of this and
surrounding land. The promotion of office use in commercial areas is intended
as a secondary or subordinate use when located within a planned commercial area.
This is substantiated by the Commerce Element objectives and policies as well as
the definition of "Commercial ". Comprehensive Plan Objective 3, Policy 1 (Com-
merce /Industry) promotes retail development.
9. Risk of Upset:
Results of seismic disturbances are not addressed in the Checklist. This would
seem necessary in light of PSCOG's Regional Disaster Plan, pages 49- 50, due to
the soil characteristics of the site and the height of the proposed structure.
Recent settlement problems at the Carriage House underscore the potential problem.
10. Population:
The proposal seems to carry some degree of indirect increase in population by
virtue of the number of employees and the l'iklihood some percentage desiring
to reside in the immediate vicinity.
11. Housing:
Again, by virtue of the likely desire on the part of some of the users of this pro
posed structure, an unidentified increase in the demand for housing should be anti
cipated.
Memorandum
Kjell Stoknes
Page 3
4 May 1978
12. Transportation /Circulation:
The proposal represents significant increases in both volume and peak of
vehicular traffic. These impacts will also conflict with established, com-
mercial traffic patterns. Serious vehicular congestion is anticipated as a
result of this project. A proportionate increase in vehicular and pedestrian
hazards must also be anticipated.
13. Public Services:
The bulk characteristics of the proposed structure (height in particular)
will place a strain on available fire department manpower as that depart-
ment is not staffed to handle high -rise structures.
Increased traffic congestion and resulting need for manual control will
create a need for more manpower in the Police Department.
14. Aesthetics:
The proposed structure will result in at least partial obstruction of a
heavily vegetated and steep slope. Tukwila hill residents as well as users
of the surrounding commercial area will experience the disruption of a scenic
view. The prominence of the proposed structure will constitute a landmark,
adding to its visual' significance.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. Several impacts which appear to be minor in.scale include:
a. Flora and fauna within the construction area itself is essentially non-
existent and therefore, impacts are insignificant. Also, the vegetated
hillside to the rear of the proposed structure is capable of accepting
any displaced wildlife.
b. Demand for housing and related increase in population would appear to
be of an insignificant scale.
c. Extension of utilities necessary to serve the proposal seem to be of
minor consequence.
2. Many direct and indirect impacts associated with the proposal may be signifi-
cant, either due to their very nature or due to the lack of information regard-
ing them. They include:
a. Considerable changes to the natural soils are necessary to support the
proposed structure and further unidentified actions are indicated as
necessary in the soils report. The effects of these actions may well
be of an adverse nature.
b. Increased air contaminants as an indirect result of the project (via
automobile traffic) is expected. The degree of impact is compounded .
by the vehicular traffic congestion expected as an indirect result of
construction.
A •
Memorandum � ` Page 4
}jell Stoknes 4 May 1978
c. Approximately 400,000 square feet (9 acres) of impervious surfaces,
during a 10 -year storm, will contribute approximately 4500 gallons '
of storm water runoff per minute (10 cfs) to the existing storm water
system. This impact my be significant.
d. A proportionate increase in existing noise levels is anticipated
(relative to vehicular traffic). However, it remains unidentified.
e. Increased lighting levels are expected as a result of, primarily, park-
ing lot lighting. Interior /exterior building lighting, however, will
affect current lighting levels experienced by hillside residents (Ren-
ton as well as Tukwila) due to the abnormal height of the building.
Building signing (as yet unidentified) may contribute to this impact.
f. Potential harm during upset conditions (primarily seismic) seems
greater with this project than typically anticipated. The nature of
soils coupled with the abnormal height of the proposed structure requires
identification of the potential impact to determine its significance.
g. The heavily vegetated, steep hillside to the rear of the proposed struc-
ture constitutes a scenic view not only for users of the immediate
vicinity but residents of the Tukwila hill (south face) and Talbot Hill
area of Renton as well. The proposed structure, due solely to its height,
will intrude into and partially obstruct this existing view.
3. The following environmental elements are deemed to experience significant
adverse effects as a result of the proposal:
a. Land Use: The proposal, due primarily to its location, will adversely
affect the long -term viability of the established and planned "regional
commercial" area. It represents a serious departure from established
surrounding development character and will establish a precedent and
impetus for further departure. It directly.conflicts with several Objec-
tives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan, especially the Commerce/
Industry Element thereof. The proposed office use of ±10 acres of prime
commercially - designated land seems to be in direct conflict with the plan.
b. Transportation /Circulation: Not only does the proposal represent signi-
ficant increases in volume and peak loads of vehicular traffic, but the
very character of the vehicular traffic will seriously conflict with the
established nature (commercial) and pattern of traffic in this vicinity.
The need for imported fill will also conflict with established traffic
patterns. A proportionate decrease in vehicular /pedestrian safety is
expected as well. The Police and Public Works Departments indicate that
traffic problems associated with this proposal need further clarification
to fully identify the extent of adverse impacts.
c Public Services: Both the Fire and Police Departments have indicated the
definite need, either immediately or in the near future, for additional
personnel to service this proposal.
4. Land Use, Transportation, and Public Service elements of the environment are
expected to experience significant adverse impacts as a result of the proposal.
In addition to these definite adverse impacts, several potential adverse impacts
Memorandum
Kjell Stoknes
GC /ch
cc:. Dir, Public Works
Chief, Fire Dept.
Chief, Police Dept.
Page 5
4 May 1978
(Air, Water, Light and Aesthetics) add to the extent of adverse impacts asso-
ciated with this proposal. Lastly, cumulative impacts (Air, Land Use, Trans-
portation, Public Services and Aesthetics) are long -term effects and cannot be
mitigated.
5. The sheer size and scale of the proposal ( ±1500 employees, 1'1100 parking spaces,
9 acres of impervious surfaces, 133 -foot height of structure) constitute a major
action sicmificantly affecting the environment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the foregoing conclusions, the Planning Division recommends an affirmative
threshold determination be made and an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared
and utilized in the decision- making process with regard to this proposal.
WUHPGENCY KENW
028 216P
SEA130(1 543)(1 - v24159C1 18)PI.) 04/26/78 1543
'IWX LEV11L MIA
1 MIAMI, FL APRIL 28, 1978
PMS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSONAL DELIVERY ONLY
CITY HALL, CITY OF TIJKWIL..A
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188
THE AGREEMENT FOR A DRIVEWAY EASEMENT LOCATED TWENTY -FIVE FEET ON
EITHER SIDE OF THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE LAND OCCUPIED
BY LEVITZ FURNITURE AND JACK A. 8ENAROYA CO. HAS BEEN EXECUTED by
LEVITZ FURNITURE.
EDWARD P. Z1MMER, ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL
LEVITZ FURNITURE CORPORATION
NNNN
REMPTO
pig TUKW1LP
MI 8.1918
Kum DEPT.
Planning Commission ( Page 4
Minutes 27 April 1978
/(' Architectural screening of roof - mounted equipment.
evelopment Plans: Benaroya Office Building
Mr. Crutchfield read the staff report explaining the location and nature of the
proposal. Noted the staff recommendation to table action on this item until the
regular May meeting to allow completion of environmental review.
Mr. Robert Fehnel, Benaroya Company, stated the applicant feels the criteria
of Section 18.60.035 are met and requested approval of the Planning Commission.
Explained contractual obligation to the Boeing Company to have the building com-
pleted by December of 1978. The delay recommended by staff will seriously inhibit
the Benaroya Company's ability to meet that deadline.
Mr. Chet Lindsey, Architect, noted the exterior of the building will include brick
and solar bronze glass. Stated this will be highly compatible with the development
in the area. Also explained the hillside to the rear of the project is higher than
the building, thus . it will not be adversely affected by shadows.
Chairman Kirsop recalled the cutting of the hillside behind Carriage House. Mr.
Jack Benaroya, proponent, assured the Commission the hillside behind this project
would not be touched.
Mr. Ken Long, Benaroya Company, stated the project conforms to the Comprehensive
Plan; building set back to eliminate problem to adjacent uses, set into hillside
which provides excellent backdrop as well as a view for office building occupants.
Noted ownership of adjacent parcels, any shadows will fall on Benaroya property.
Landscape theme established at existing and surrounding developments will be con-
tinued in this project.
Mr. Benaroya stated the proposed office building is the highest and best use for
the ten acres of land affected.
Chairman Kirsop asked if any on -site eating facilities will be included. Mr. Ben -
aroya stated the office building will contain a cafeteria and one or two on -site
restaurants are being planned. Noted the building is of a multi- tenant design
with more elevators than required. As of now, the building is planned to be
exclusively occupied by Boeing.
Mr. Fehnel explained a traffic consultant hired by the Benaroya Company has indicated
the possible need for a traffic light at the main entrance on Southcenter Parkway.
Commissioner Richards noted potential traffic conflicts with adjacent properties
and rechannelization on Southcenter Parkway. Mr. Long noted meetings between the
Benaroya Company and the Public Works Department more than a year ago had resulted
in the conclusion that ultimate development of the Parkway Plaza West area should
include no more than 4 curb cuts. The proposed office building reflects this
guideline. Traffic lights and channelization on Southcenter Parkway are anticipated.
Commissioner Richards pointed out the common driveway situated on the adjacent property
owned by Levitz. Mr. Benaroya stated a copy of the agreement with Levitz to utilize
their property for access will be provided tomorrow.
.
•
Planning Commission
Minutes
Page 5
27 April 1978
Commissioner Richards noted the subject area is affected by drainage from the above
hillside and I -5. Mr. Fehnel explained drainage provisions have been incorporated
into the design process.
Commissioner Richards noted the circulation problem inherent in the design of the
parking lot, specifically the frontage road. Mr. Fehnel acknowledged the problem
and explained the traffic engineer has suggested revisions to eliminate that
problem. Mr. Long distributed a traffic study to the Commissioners. Mr. Satter -
strom noted the traffic study has been given to the Public Works Department as a
part of the environmental review process and the Planning Division is awaiting
their response.
Commissioner Richards asked if traffic lights and crosswalks would be installed
prior to occupancy of the building. Mr. Fehnel stated yes and that approval of
the project can and should be conditioned as the Commission deems appropriate.
Commissioner Avery noted the extent of over - parking. Mr. Satterstrom explained
that Boeing, the planned occupant, has parking peculiarities. Explained most
multi - tenant office buildings do not require the planned extent of parking.
Commissioner Avery asked how the proposed building height compared to the Com-
prehensive Plan. Mr. Crutchfield read two policies from the Commerce /Industry
element of the Comprehensive Plan (Policy 3 under Objective 1; Policy 2 under
Objective 4).
Commissioner Richards asked if sufficient landscaping was provided in front of
the building, noting the sea of parking provided.between Southcenter Parkway and
the building itself. Considerable discussion ensued regarding site revisions
which could be incorporated into the project.
Chairman Kirsop requested a motion for preliminary approval of the building noting
that site revisions could be accomplished within 60 days. Motion by Mr. Bowen and
seconded by Mr. Richards to approve the location of the structure subject to
Planning Commission review of all site improvements, except foundation, within
60 days.
Chairman Kirsop, upon inquiry, explained the intention of the motion is to allow
the applicant to meet contractual deadlines and reserve revision details (traffic,
landscape, etc.) for future Planning Commission approval. Staff noted that building
permits were not issued in the absence of site design details.
Motion carried.
Chairman Kirsop declared a brief recess.
Chairman Kirsop reconvened the meeting at 10:25 p.m.
G. Tenant Improvement: Bedford Project
Mr. Crutchfield, noting this item had been submitted after preparation of the
agenda, read a memorandum describing the proposed improvements to accommodate
an office tenant. Explained original Commission approval of this development
including concern regarding distribution of parking spaces and was based on
industrial use.
27 April 1978 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM V F
The Benaroya Company has proposed construction of a 9 -story office building
immediately north of Levitz on Southcenter Parkway. Section 18.60.035 (TMC)
authorizes structures to exceed the 45 -foot height limit only upon approval
of the Planning Commission after review in accordance with said TMC Section.
Reductions of the site and elevation drawings are attached.
FINDINGS:
1. The site of the proposal lies between Southcenter Parkway and I -5 immedi-
ately north of Levitz. It comprises approximately six acres of currently
surcharged and vacant land.
2. The property was classified M -1 (Light Industry) in 1969 under Ordinance
#567 which established the concept that development of this land area
should complement the CM use district across Southcenter Parkway.
3. The proposal includes construction of a 9 -story office building containing
216,044 square feet of gross floor area. The overall height of the struc-
ture from grade is 133 feet. (SEE, Exhibit A and B)
4. As such, the structure exceeds the 45 -foot height limit of the M -1 zone.
Section 18.60.035 (TMC), however, provides for exceptions from the height
restriction, but only upon approval of the Planning Commission in accordance
with the criteria spelled out under Section 18.60.035. (SEE, Exhibit C)
A. 18.60.035(1): Minimum setback from centerline of Southcenter Parkway,
based on building height, is 88 feet. The structure is proposed to
be situated approximately 320 feet from said centerline.
B. 18.60.035(2): Minimum side and rear yard setbacks, based again on
the building height, are 58 feet. The structure is proposed to be
situated approximately 250 feet from the south property line and
approximately 230 feet from the north property line. The rear pro-
perty line is not depicted on any of the drawings; the setback,
therefore, cannot be ascertained.
CI T Y OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Development Plans: Benaroya Office Building
C. 18.60.035(3): Not applicable.
D. 18.60.035(4): The proposed setbacks appear to be sufficient to
'...insure adequate light and air for (existing) uses on adjacent
property." (Levitz, Carriage House and Parkway Plaza) The rear of
Planning Commission Page 2
Staff Report 27 April 1978
the subject property, however, is a valley wall which is heavily veg-
etated. The proposed structure will obscure daylight to this area
during morning hours.
E. 18.60.035(5) :. This requirement can be fulfilled under this review.
Section 18.32,040 (TMC) states the purpose of such review is "...to
protect and preserve the natural beauty and charm existent in and
inherent to these and peripheral properties."
The natural beauty and charm existent in this property is, primarily,
the wooded hillside to the rear. The plans reflect no consideration
of such area. Surrounding developments, specifically Levitz and Car-
riage House, have retained the hillside in its naturally wooded character.
Measures implemented in conjunction with development of Levitz, Car-
riage House and Parkway Plaza included landscape corridors along
Southcenter Parkway and landscape islands within the parking areas.
F. 18.60.035(6): Environmental review of this proposal has not been
completed and, therefore, all effects to adjacent and /or surrounding
properties are difficult to identify. They include but may not be
limited to:
(1) Increased traffic volumes;
(2) Creation of new peak hours of traffic movement;
(3) Elimination of potential commercial facilities in existing and
planned commercial area;
(4) Internal traffic patterns as they relate to adjacent properties
as well as Southcenter Parkway.
Comprehensive Plan policies relative to this proposal include the following:
(1) Natural Environment, Objective 3, Policy 2: This policy promotes
consideration of areas of high natural amenity as open spaces in
conjunction with development design.
(2) Commerce /Industry, Objective 1, Policy 1: This policy strives to
group land uses which are complementary to each other; conversely,
it serves to discourage the grouping of non- complementary uses.
(3) Commerce /Industry, Objective 1, Policy 3: This policy directs that
development guidelines should be established and maintained to
assure the attainment of the desired image of a given development area.
(4) Commerce /Industry, Objective 3, Policy 1: This policy promotes
strategic location of facilities supportive to a retail area so as
to assure the longevity and viability of a planned retail area;
conversely, land uses which are non - functional to a retail area
are discouraged.
Planning Commission
Staff Report
Page 3
27 April 1978
(5) Commerce /Industry, Objective 4, Policy 2: This policy explicitly
directs that office developments reflect consideration of adja-
cent or surrounding use areas. It essentially strives to assure
physical compatibility with neighboring structures as well as
architectural themes.
(6) Transportation /Utilities, Objective 1, Policy 9: This policy
strives to reduce traffic conflicts in areas of high traffic
volume through coordination of internal traffic patterns with
adjacent properties and major arterials.
The Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan designates both sides of
Southcenter Parkway from Strander Boulevard to a point south of Levitz
as "Commercial" (defined as "Commercial areas...and compatible and com-
plementary uses including offices ").
G. 18.60.035(7): It is the responsibility of the applicant to comply with
all applicable rules and regulations of other agencies.
H. 18.60.035(8): Design alternatives and /or mitigating measures cannot
be sufficiently identified prior to completion of the environmental review.
z. 18.60.035(9): At 3.1 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross
floor area, the project must provide 658 parking spaces. The plan
provides 1,095 spaces, or 437 spaces beyond the minimum requirement.
This represents a parking surplus of 66 %.
J. 18.60.035(10): All other provisions of the M -1 district appear to be
complied with.
Inasmuch as criteria #4, 6 and 8 under Section 18.60.035 (TMC) cannot be sufficiently .
exercised in the absence of a completed environmental review, Staff requests this
matter be tabled for a decision at the regular May meeting to allow consideration
of the environmental information.
r#
EAST ELEVATION
/-
a -.
► Arnim
. /.....
_I /11111.11111.11111i.
.•.1•1...
11111111.r.M111111111111
5..._... .
1111111111111111111111111111111101111111 i
a ..1•... .
■
-... .
..... .
Nu. .
N gi IN
•
CM L 11M011Y
•IIKIIICl/
NM Mob a.m. 11.1114
0.1..•••
(-
305 -1
18.60.035 Height exceptions in M -1, M -2 and C -M
districts. In the M -1, M -2 and C -M districts situated
south of Interstate 405 and within the city limits, build-
ings may be erected to a height not to exceed three hundred
feet provided:
,7( 1) Distance from the center of streets at the base
of the building shall not be less than two - thirds of the
building height;
L'( 2) Width of side and rear yards not fronting on
streets shall be not less than two - thirds of the setback
required from the center of the street or streets;
V( 3) Where a district in which a building is located
requires greater setbacks or yard areas, these shall govern;,
( 4) Above setbacks to be approved by the planning
commission to insure adequate light and air for uses on
adjacent property and may be adjusted where necessary by
the planning commission;
( 5) All plans are approved under the . "Architectural
Control" provisions of Section 18.32.040;
( 6) The use will not be, unduly detrimental to adjacent
and /or surrounding property;
( 7) Full compliance is made with all rules and regu-
lations of any governing federal, state•or county regulatory
agencies which may have jurisdiction within the corporate
limits of Tukwila;
( 8) In authorizing construction of a building under
this section, the planning commission may impose such addi-
tional requirements and conditions with respect to location,
adequate parking facilities, installation, construction,
design, maintenance and operation and extent of open spaces
as may be deemed necessary for the promotion of the public
health, safety and welfare or for the protection of other
properties in the district or vicinity;
.( 9) Parking shall be on the same property on which
the building is located or contiguous thereto. Parking
space must be provided at a rate' of three and one-tenths
cars per thousand feet of gross floor area or four cars per
thousand feet of gross rentable floor area;
(10) Full compliance is made with all other provisions'
as set forth for the use district in which the building is
to be located. (Ord. 635 §23, 1970).
18.60.035
(Tukwila 12/31/70)
PLANNING
PARKS 3
RECREATION
BUILDING
24 April. 1978
Mr. Robert Fehnel
Benaroya Company
5950 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98108
RE: Lot Lines for Office Building
Dear Mr. Fehnel:
This office has reviewed the information submitted under your letter dated 17
April 1978 and addressed to me regarding property lines for the Benaroya Office
Building project in Tukwila.
First, the drawing provided with the letter appears to be a copy of a Kroll
page and is therefore neither necessarily accurate nor current. Secondly, it
appears that your "project boundaries" have been imposed upon the drawing
irrespective of existing lot lines.
In order to accurately determine the applicability of subdivision requirements
for this project, it is imperative that I be furnished an Assessor's map with
current lot lines (as they exist by record of the King County Assessor) and
the lots to be consumed by the proposed project. Attachment of 1977 or 1978
tax statements for the affected parcels will be most helpful.
Since tim
informa
Since►e y,
Ga rutc• field
Assistant Planner
GC /ch
cc: Dir, OCD
Assoc Plnr
.. Bldg Off
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
is of such concern to your firm, please provide the necessary
at your earliest convenience.
6230 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177
Jack A. Benaroya,C4mpany 5950. Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
April 18, 1978
City of Tukwila
Building Department
6230 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attention: Mr. Al Pieper RE: PARKWAY PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING
We are enclosing all necessary documents, plan fee and enviornmental review checks,
and permit application for a building permit for the above- referenced facility.
Please begin the processing of the enclosed plans and note that it is our intention
to have the balance of the completed plans to you by May 1, 1978.
It is our understanding that your staff can begin the enviornmental review process.
Thank you very much for your cooperation in expediting this project.
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
JONES ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Job No.
CLIENT
Transmitted from Production to Administration by
Date
Transmitted from Administration to Client by
Date I
METHOD
Certified Mail
By Hand
Client Pickup
GI
0
TRANSMITTAL CONSISTED .OF:
By Date Certif. ##
By C. 1'1 Date ,_' - l . Rec.
By Date Rec.
•
Report, titled
Letter report dated
Legal description dated For
Design plans of
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Sheet thru dated
Original field notes: Page to Book
Copy field notes: Page to Book
Survey Plat: Sheet to dated
Survey Map: Sheet to dated
Specifications, titled
dated
Other, described as
To:
Attn:
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval
❑ For your use
❑ As requested
❑ For review and comment
❑ Prints returned after loan to us
❑ In accordance w /professional service agreement
❑ Other
Remarks
Signed ----
(.,
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950. Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
April 17, 1978
.I
City of Tukwila
Planning Department
6230 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attention: Mr. Gary Crutchfield
RE: PARKWAY PLAZA OFFICE BUILDING
Per your request, we are enclosing a
site.
You will note the site was purchased
and IV, as shown on the plat.
Robert H. Fehnel
tax plat showing the proposed office building
from Iverson and encompasses Areas•II,:III,
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
rt.6s 2.55Ac.
838 Ac.
T. c. r.7
RGE FORSYTH
77d 38
[ L.2 6
ISP: ON
4 Ac
S.54 Ac. tt■
• 1 r'
100 Ac.
7,1.96
40 .
a,
:ORSYIN •
Ac. •
• ri.n
473Ac:
r,1.G9
AMERICAN ATIO JAL
INSURAN O.
4C6.
16.4SAc.
173R.TL.5
0:
a •
0
c1
0
z
x.1.79
N
; 3
AMERICAN NATIONAL
IN'SURANCE CO
8.48 AC.
LEVI r 2
URN /Ts/A C
r NA I r 1.
A' I
i ll
I 2 ."
.:. •
- N KL.2 E R •
35
236
-1225
\\.
is -4
•
.7 74 .!:•..,, T4rP41.7774:::71770F'r.S.
•
55( 7cA
--, OERAROYA JACK A CO
uo\ 5950 6TH AVE S
SE ATTLE WA
ADDRESS
CORNED
TION
HERE
IERCRIE
DISTRI-
BUTION
IMPORTANT - READ REVERSE SIDE BEFORE MAKING PAYMENT •
35- 23 -0
PO R NE 1/4
SST SUBO TH
TO W MC:N S
TPOB TH S
N 87 -45 -57
LAND VALUE
LOT BLOCK
9106
OF NW 1 /4
N 87 -45 -5
UUTHCENTER
11 -59 -33 E
W 220.11
BLDG. /IMP VAL
170,50o
STATE SCHOOL SUP PORT
673.99
LOCAL SCH OOL SUPPO
697.00
THIS AMOUNT HAS BEEN
DEDUCTED I N EMPT ON SENOR
MST.
40 _
COUNTY
420.7C
93108
CODE _SEC. TWP. —R.G.
2340 39 23 04
BEG NE OCR
7 to 481.05 FT
PARKWAY C
41. FT TH
FT TH S
OTHER
35.64
TOTAL VALUE 100%
170,500
PORT
92.41
ETC,
R.-
ROLL
YEAR
TOTAL TAX
TAXABLE VALUE
170/500
T" €:� n°1
L r'a! wv .
ACCOUNT NUMBER
352304 91 -02
OMIT
YEAR
CITY /ROAD
484.05
1978 G C SAT OFF STATEMENT
TAX AMOUNT DELINQUENT
LEVY RATE
14.0
FIRE
.0
zlj
t t:
FULL
HALF
SEWER /WATER
2,403.8 4
1,201.94 2
F
INTEREST
GENERAL TAX (SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
7 y ft �0 3 . ii ji .00
.001
L PAY HALF OR
FULL BY APRIL 30
RECEIVED
O.C.D.
CFTY OF TUKWIIA
MAY. 8 1978
LIBRARY
.00
•
TO:
NOTICE OF HEARING ON FILIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
.FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
352304 - 9106 -02
Ilenaroya, Jack A. Co.
5950 Sixth Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98108
Notice is hereby given that the assessment roll for Local Improvement
District No. 27 of the City of Tukwila, Washington, has been prepared as
provided by law and is on file and open to inspection in the office of the
City Clerk, Tukwila City Nall, Tukwila, Washington.
Notice is further given that a hearing on said assessment roll will be held
at 7:00 p.m., on the 8th day of Clay, 1978, in the Council Chambers, Tukwila
City Hall, Tukwila, Washington, and that any person who may desire to make
objection or protest to any assessment shown thereon must make his objection
or protest in writing and file it with the City Clerk at or prior to the date
fixed for the hearing.
At the time and place fixed and at times to which the hearing may be adjourned,
the Council will set as a board of equalization for the purpose of considering
the roll and the Council will consider the objections and protests made and
will correct, revise, raise, lower, change or modify the roll or any part
thereof or set aside the roll and order the assessment to be made de novo,
and at the conclusion thereof, confirm the roll by ordinance.
Reference is made to Resolution No. 01, passed'January 20, 1975, and Ordi-
nance No. 922, passed April 7, 1975, of the City of Tukwila for a description
of the boundaries of Local Improvement District No. 27.
Legal Description of Property Assessed Amount of Final Assessment
352304 - 9106 -02
S -T -R 35-23 T. Lot 9106
Por NE 1/4 of NW 1/4 beg NE cor sd subd
th'N 87 ° 45'57:' W 481.05 ft to W mgn South -
center Parkway & tpob th S 11 °59133" E 41.27
ft. th N 8 7 ° 45'57" W 229.11 ft th S 42 ° 30'27"
W 537 ft M/L tap on a In wch is 19.5 ft SW1y
of C/L of 19 ft RR Easement th Nly alg a In
wch is concentric & piw sd C/L 481 ft M/L
to N In sd subd th S 87 ° 45'57" E 660 ft M/L
to tpob
$3,482.49
t om .
Maxine Anderson
• � /4 jj'' City Clerk, City of Tukwila, Washington
7701050686
Title Insurance Services
1
1 L!,-/
35a..sc4-cfj�
FILED FOn RECORD AT REOUEST OF
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO
Name Jack A. Benaroya Company
Address 5950 -Sixth Avenue South
cuy,smto,Zip
Seattle, WA
� 0
O r
/r'IiE GRANTOR
Dated
Real Estate Sales 'Fax was paid on this sale on
634257 -1 SC
rf�2
January 3,
Harold R. Iverson
; C
:j.
Transamerica l
Title Insurance C.....pany
RECO E- .. ....
Flt.tit) FOR RECORD At gazirit:T oe
7PANWOBRlCA TEELE
98108 rn lSURANc1• 0 N.,f.,•.
Ert R PIACI: ,
Statutory Warranty Deed ``n •r' UNIVERSITY
,J/'S{I,•:GTOV 9E101
HAROLD R. IVERSON and MARION E. IVERSON,. his wife •
for and inconsfdorationof TEN AND NO /100 ($10.00) DOLLARS
7• in hand paid, conveys and warrants to JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY, a Washington Corporation
the following described real estate, situated in the County of King
As hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof, as
(EXHIBIT "A ")
Exceptions as hereto attached and by this reference made a part
hereof, as (EXHIBIT "B ")
SUBJECT TO: Preliminary Assessment under LID No. 27, with the
City of Tukwila for storm drains.
This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the parties hereto, dated
April 30 ,19 76 , and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property, and the covenants of warranty
herein contained shall not apply to any title, interest or encumbrance arising by, through or under the purchaser in said contract, and
shall not apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges levied, assessed or becoming due subsequent to the data of said contract.
May 17, 1976
,19 77
7Ztt./Lc.a��
THIS SPACE PROVIDED FOR RECORDER'S USE:
, State of Washington:
,Ree.No. 7605170740,
E351709
rim
Marion E. Iverson, by Harold R.
vcrsb , Attorney iii by fact
1• . ;t J
em u- in 7f.t.2N
•
i1itES TAX PAID ON CeiffriACT A=F. 1:0.071,f
KING CO. R.Cf:IS DIVISION
• STATE OI ,,)VASIHINGT
Count of t.l, Kln. SY....,, , DEPUTY
i! :''" Omlhis,�'' . • day of January , 19 77 77, before me personally appeared
Harold R,.' .Ivor son to me known to be the individual described in and who executed
the foregoing i)stn;rcent for him self and also as Attorney in fact for Marion E. Iverson
!. - id'acknowledgL•d.that,: he signed and sealed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed for him
• 'self ;{n& also as• his free and voluntary act and deed as Attorney in Fact for said principal for the uses and
purposes, uherejn nieationed, and on oath stated that the Power of Attorney authorizing the execution of this instrument
has not been revolted and that the said principal is now living and is not insane.
Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last aboup- tGjitten.
N otary Public in d for the State of Washington,
residing at
7701050686
•
EXHIBIT "A"
That portion of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 35,
Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., King County, Washington,
described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Northeast 1/4 of the North-
west 1 /4;
thence North 87 ° 45' 57" West along the North line of said Northeast 1/4
of the Northwest 1/4, a distance of 481.05 feet to the West margin of
Southcenter Parkway and the point of beginning;
thence South 11 East along' said 'West margin a distance of
41.27 feet;
thence North 87 ° 45'57" West a distance of 229.11 feet;
thence South 42 ° 30'27" West a distance of 537 feet, more or less, to
.. a point on a line which is 19.5 feet Southwesterly of the center line of.
a 19 foot railroad easement established by instrument recorded under
Auditor's File No. 6643574;
thence Northerly along a line which is concentric and parallel with said
center line 481 feet, more or less, to the North line, said Section 35;
thence. South 87 ° 45'57" East 660 feet, more or less, to the true point
of beginning. Grantor reserves an.easement over the Northerly 15
feet of the above described property for ingress, egress and utilities,
Including, but not limited to storm drainage, sanitary sewer and
domestic water .to serve property adjoining and Westerly of . the above •
•
•
•
EXHIBIT "B"
Easement granted to the State of Washington for the purpose of
constructing and maintaining a drainage system including culverts
and ditches, but not exclusive thereto, as disclosed in instrument
recorded under Auditor's File No. 6240703. The State of Wash-
ington agrees that should any damage accrue to adjacent lands of
the grantor by reason of the construction and maintenance of said
drainage line, then any compensation therefor shall be a matter of
future negotiation.
Easement granted to the. State of Washington for the purpose of
constructing and maintaining a drainage system including culverts
and ditches, but not exclusive thereto, as disclosed in instrument
recorded under Auditor's File No. 6240706.
Easement wherein the grantee is the City of Tukwila, for the pur-
pose of constructing and maintaining utility lines and mains with the
necessary appurtenances, affecting the West 15 feet of the East 21
feet of the property herein described, dated April 5, 1968 and re-
corded May 6, 1968 under Auditor's File No. 6343878.
Easement for railroad lead track as created by Instrument recorded
under Auditor's File No. 6643574.
Easement for sanitary sewer as created by Instrument recorded
under Auditor's File No. 6680144.
Easement wherein the grantee Is the City of Tukwila, for storm line,
together with temporary construction easement, dated June 17, 1975
and recorded June 17, 1975 under Auditor's File No. 7506170674.
Slope easement wherein the grantee is the State of Washington, for
the purpose of constructing and maintaining drainage easement slopes
in excavation and /or embankment, as disclosed In instrument recorded
under Auditor's File No. 6240704.
Slope easement wherein the grantee is the State of Washington,, for
• the purpose of constructing and maintaining drainage easement slopes
. in excavation and /or embankment, as disclosed in instrument .recorded
under Auditor's File No. 6240705.
'• Property Use and Development Agreement between the City of Tukwila
and Stanley Kasperson, Trustee, regarding covenants, conditions or
restrictions imposed on the property herein described in connection
with the petition to rezone this and other property into M-1 classification,
dated July 21, 1969 and recorded August 28, 1969 under Auditor's File
No. 6557642.
nE: 555.1
.•)t.nd*lo.00SP)
,n b jr C / ' ( Checked
SKETCH OF PROPERTY SE
To assist in locating the premises. It i
assumes no liability for variations
Date 171"1(,9f 76 Plii Vol.
OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER
n ot based on a survey, and the company
if any, in dimensions and location.
Note —This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or casements affecting the property.
•
2
PLEAS
AtAKE
tiME
AMUSE
CORHEE-
TIES
HERE
7.4X- AMESI.- A D.
IMPORTANT - READ REVERSE SIDE BEFORE MAKING PAYMENT
5501'74
BENAROYA JACK A CO
5950 6TH AVE S
SEATTLE WA
LOT BLOCK CODE SEC.-
.
' 819
S
•
TO:
•
NOTICE OF HEARING ON FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
FOR LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT HO. 27
CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON
262304 - 9067 -00
Benaroya, Jack A. Company CO576
5950 - 6th Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98108
Notice is hereby given that the assessment roll for Local Improvement
District No. 27 of the City of Tukwila, Washington, has been prepared as
provided by law and is on file and open to inspection in the office of the
City Clerk, Tukwila City Hall, Tukwila, Washington.
Notice is further given that a hearing on said assessment-roll will be held
at 7:00 p.m., on the 8th day of May, 1970, in the Council Chambers, Tukwila
City Hall, Tukwila, Washington, and that any person who may desire to make
objection or protest to any assessment shown thereon must make his objection
or protest in writing and file it with the City Clerk at or prior to the date
fixed for the hearing.
At the time and place fixed and at times to which the hearing may be adjourned,
the Council will set as a board of equalization for the purpose of considering
the roll and the Council will consider the objections and protests made and
will correct, revise, raise, lower, change or modify the roll or any part
thereof or set aside the roll and order the assessment to be made de novo,
and at the conclusion thereof, confirm the roll by ordinance.
Reference is made to Resolution No. 471, passed 'January 20, 1975, and Ordi-
nance No. 922, passed April 7, 1.975, of the City of Tukwila for a description
of the boundaries of Local Improvement District No. 27.
legal Description of Property Assessed Amount of Final Assessment
262304- 9067 -00
S -T -R 26- 23-04, T. Lot 9067, Por SE
1/4 of SW 1/4 beg SE cor sd subd th N 87
45'57" W 481.05 ft. to W mgn Southcenter
Parkway and TPOB th contg Il 87 ° 45'57" W tap
on a In wch is plw b 39 ft. NWIy of center
In of 19 ft. RR esmt th ti 16 ° 18'55" E, 92
ft. M/L to C/L of 40 ft, drainage esmt th
N 50 ° 38'32" W, 224 ft. M/L to W In of SE 1/4
of SW 1/4 th N 00 ° 56'36" E, 344.61 ft. th tl
82 ° 18'16" E, 680.15 ft. to W mgn Southcenter
Parkway th S 11 ° 59'33" E, 707.86 ft. to TPOB
$11,660.75
Maxine Anderson
City Clerk, City of Tukwila, Washington
•
7701050685
2623049067
e.:.,( i Transamerica Corporation
Filed for Record at Request of
P.1 r.SCCraIT T52.0e,PRI
Name Jack A. Benaroya Company
Address S950 - Sixth Avenue South
City and State Seattle, WA 98108
634256 -8 SC
Dated this 3rd
•� ^I /0111.1V7. ArI,NON'1 r.IOICNr
I'I.NII VAL ANO At Al1ONNLY . IN PACT.
Statutory Warranty Deed
a eua
THIS SPACE PROVIDED tOR RECORDER'S USE'
1 EOk RECORD AT ;1:OLAIIVeCk
TMNSAAiriz 'tnij
INSURANCE C` „ IzAH -
oar tiNivf :; ;Y
Sfl? 1 rLH, WASII r
THE GRANTOR HAROLD R. IVERSON and E. IVERSON, his wife
for and in consideration of TEN AND NO /100 ($10.00) DOLLARS
in hand paid, conveys and warrants to JACK A. BENAROYA COMPANY, a Washington
corporation
the following described real estate, situated in the County of King , State of
Washington:
As hereto attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
(BXIIIB1T "A ")
Exceptions attached and by this reference made a part hereof.
(EXHIBIT "B ")
SUBJECT' TO: Preliminary Assessment under LID No. 27, with
the City of Tukwila for storm drains.
SALES TAX PAID ON COII?RLCT f:sF• i+O•l •g' C
SY KING C). 41`IZ•C'
This deed is given in fulfillment of that certain real estate contract between the part ies hereto, dated
April 26 , 19 76 , and conditioned for the conveyance of the above described property, cad
the covenants of warranty herein contained shall not apply to any title, interest or encumbrance arising by,
through or under the purchaser in said contract, and shall not apply to any taxes, assessments or other charges
levied, assessed or becoming due subsequent to the date of said contract.
Real Estate Sales Tax was paid on this sale on May 17, 1976 , Rec. No. 7605170738, E351707
day of January
(f,1 STF y;; t'F :: Conveyance ' ;✓J� /� � ter. -_ _—
.1 1 il lis ,roll R. Ivor .on n
V • cr J;V• a .: ` - a ? i J (1 ._ • , �17/.' t/Lt��
Marion E. Iverson, by Harold R.
r r Iverson, Attorney -in -fact
/t}c/ / /iiFd L :C :/�4j1•cc_z I• i..r /ct.. G(Ctit ..
1
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
County of King , / r.
•
•:.Qn this • .. T day of January • , 19 77 , before me personally appeared
Harold` R. IVeTSOn to me known to be the individual described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument for him self and also as Attorney in fact for Marion E. Iverson
:and acknowledged that:: he signed and sealed the sine as his free and voluntary act and deed for him
self ancl also as hi!, ' free and voluntary act and decd as Attorney in Fact for said principal for the uses and
liurposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that the Power of Attorney authorizing the execution of this instrument
has not ltcen revnked and that the said principal is now living and is not insane.
Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above ritten.
•
Notary Pubiic in fart for the State of Washington,
residing at
,1S 77
,e)
EXHIBIT "A"
IT tar
That portion of tho Southeast 4 of the Southwest 4 of Section
26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.::. , in the City of
Tukwila, King County, Washington, described as follows:
1.11
oD Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southeast s
CD of the Southwest 4 of Section 26;
thence North 87 °45'57" West along the South line of said
CD
-- Southeast a of the Southwest 4, a distance of 461.05 feet
CD to the West margin of Southcenter Parkway and the. true
N point of beginning;
thence continuing North 67 West along said Sotlth
line a distance of 600 feet, more o= less, to a point on
.a line which is parallel with and 39.0 feet Northwesterly.
of the center line of a 19 feet railroad easement established
by instrument recorded under r.uditor's File No. 6643573;
thence North 16 ° 18'55" East along said parallel line 92
feet, more or leas, to the center line of a 40 foot
drainage easement granted to the State of Washington 'ay
instruments recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 6233536,
thence North 50 ° 3 8 8'32" West along said drainage easement
center line .224.feet, more or less, to the West line of
the Southeast 4 of the Southwest a of said Section 26;
thence North 00 °56'36" East along said West line 344.61 •
feet;
thence North 82 °1 8'16" East 660.15 feet to said West
margin of Southcenter Parkway; •
thence South 11 ° 59'33" East along said West margin 707.66
feet to the true point of beginning;
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State
of Washington.
• TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress and egress 20 feet in width lying
southwesterly of and adjacent to the center line of the above referenced
40 foot drainage easeraent and extending from the west line of said south-
.. east 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 224 feet more or less to a line which is
39.0 feet northwesterly from and parallel with the center line.of a 19 foot
railroad easement established by instrument recorded under Auditor's File
' No. 6643573.
Grantor reserves an easement over the southerly 15 feet.of the above
described property for ingress, egress and'utilities, including but
not limited to storm drainage, sanitary sewer and domestic water to
serve property adjoining and westerly of the above described property..
•
•
. EXHIBIT "B"
Easement wherein the State of Washington is the grantee, affecting
the Southerly portion of the property herein described, for the pur-
pose of constructing and maintaining drainage easement slopes in
excavation and/or embankment, as disclosed by instrument recorded
under Auditor's File No. 6233537. .
in
co
Easement wherein the City of Tukwila is the grantee, for utility
o mains and lines together with the necessary appurtenances thereto,
affecting the Westerly 15 feet of the Easterly 21 feet as measured
at right angles to Southcenter Parkway, as disclosed by instruments
recorded under Auditor's File Nos. 6343864, 6343866, 6343879,
6343880, and 6343881.
Easement wherein the grantee is the State of Washington, to construct
and maintain a drainage system together with the necessary appur-
tenances thereto, affecting the Southerly portion of the property herein
; described, as disclosed by Auditor's File No. 6233536.
Easement for sanitary sewer with the' necessary:appurtenances thereto,
as disclosed by instrument recorded under Auditor's File No. 6680143.
Easement for railroad purposes, wherein the grantee Is the Chicago,
Milwaukie, Saint Paul & Pacific Railroad Company and the Oregon -
Washington Railroad and Navigation Company, dated March 2, 1970
and recorded April 24, 1970 under Auditor's File No. 6643573.
Easement wherein the City of Tukwila is the grantee, for storm line,
dated June 17, 1975 and recorded June 17, 1975 under Auditor's File
No. 7506170674.
Property Use and Development Agreement between the City of Tukwila
and Stanley N. Kasperson, Trustee, regarding covenants, conditions
or restrictions imposed on the property herein tlescribed in connection
. with the petition to rezone property herein described and other adjoining
.. property into M -1 classification, dated July 21, 1969 and recorded
August 28, 1969 . under Auditor's File No. 6557642.
•
•
.1:.555.1
;m No 80 SP)
n by Checked
8 ,!
To assist in locating the premises. It i not based on a survey, and the company
I assumes no liability for variations if any, in dimensions and location.
Date L/ mil ; Plat VoL_ k,„ ;. Order No. ?
SKETCH OF PROPERTY SETT OUT IN ATTACHED ORDER
4df. os'w. !
Note —This map does not purport to show all highways, roads or easements affecting the property.
Jack A. Benaroya Company 5950 Sixth Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98108 (206) 762 4750
April 13, 1978
Planning Department
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Attention: Mr. Gary Crutchfield
RE: TUKWILA OFFICE BUILDING
We are submitting herewith two copies of a site plan and building elevations for
the purpose of plan review as required by Chapter 18.60.03 of the Tukwila Zoning Code.
Please place this review on the April 27th agenda.
Thank you.
Robert H. Fehnel
C.
. I:
INDUSTRIAL PARKS /WAREHOUSES /OFFICE BUILDINGS /SHOPPING CENTERS AND SPECIALIZED MERCHANDISE MARTS.
...••=.0.3•••■•••
•••••••
V
4 .
•
•
•
•
4
4:■
i tlimr
13---ceca 13/4
ARitft
••,„ a
. 442. 10
4
45;
1.
1;1
,■.....,MOINIMM7.•4•Ammw.n.... •
• 0000 • • • • • OOOOOOOOOO 00. SOSO
410., ea am*. •••••••■■•• we* •••••••••••••• ••• •••••••■■•■•• • • 01•••••••■■ .1.••••■•
•■■•■•••••••■••■•■••••••••••■
A N Vd IVO.) VAOY VN g I •V Y.7Vf
z
10.
EINICTUrta
/
tO
4
a<
4 .1
a a.
it •
• j
r 1 .•
a
o •
• ,
; -
;
4 0
a ▪ • n
• z
▪ 1
119111••■•
At t Ctl tl 1 N 9
NOU. A313 1.SY3
M
4
6.f. fraifrs
,t
c<ct, `0ZS {'Y�l¢c
eoza 1-4/ p pe,f/
PX ZS I Le,&4/1- e.-s/
c
25 May 1978
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Planning Commission
Gary Crutchfield
Development Plans: Benaroya Office Building (continued)
Since preparation and distribution of the 25 May 1978 Staff Report, the
applicant has submitted a landscape plan and revised site plan for the alove-
referenced project.
Review of the revised plans has resulted in a modification of the origin
staff report. That modification is as follows:
Staff recommends approval of the site plan dated 10 May 1978 and elevati•ns
with the following stipulations:
1. Relocate parking indicated in northeast corner of the site to he
vacant northwest area near the rail line; this will provide ±10',000
square feet of vacant land abutting Southcenter Parkway for co er-
cial development.
2. Provision of sidewalks along entire frontage of Southcenter Par way
and both sides of main entrance road. Also, provision of side .lks
along west side of north -south internal roadway.
3. Landscape plan dated 15 May 1978 be approved with the followin
stipulations:
a. Live groundcover of all landscape areas;
b. Trees along Southcenter Parkway and major internal
of a complementary mix of evergreen and deciduous,
caliper, minimum, and situated in clusters no more
c. Trees provided around the building of 3 -inch caliper, mi
d. Provision of outside sitting or sack -lunch area near bui
use by employees;
e. Provision of deciduous trees at intervals of every five
stalls in all parking areas, in a manner as depicted on
landscape plan;
6230 Southcenter Boulevard is Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 242 -2177
drive to be
each •. 3 -inch
than 0 -feet apart;
zmum;
ding for
arking
he above
•
J
Planning Commission
Memorandum
GC /ch
Page 2
25 May 1978.
f. Automatic irrigation along major landscape corridors and areas
of landscape concentrations;
g.
Submittal of revised landscape plan incorporating above stipula-
tions to Planning Commission for review at the regular June 1978
meeting.
9 1 a tt..�: ,. sr. , J.tr :• .; .... _. . ,,. ..: '�.;_ -. :a- � .. , .j iY+?!'':?i 'i�i. �s*!h s., x, . 3 i•i,C,.
OF1-4CE EUJL91ND
!ACK A. SENAROYA COMPANY
i
EAST ELEVATION
•
MIN
MIII
NMI
1111.
t
:•-
j owl
MIMI
.-111
i�-
—
—
-
- rr
M-■
MN
\-
MO
NMI MI MI - I- MI
Mill MN 111 - - - i ■
;_ MO -
-■ MI i-
- NM EN "MN IMN
MIN
AIM
..r N. •
- I aMI -
■ MI NM NM
- - NM I EN '� =
Ell NM MN
or l MI = 1 � SI
Mit M ■ -
am MN —
■ ■ NM -
MI NM MI
- -� MI -
�- - C
— NM — —
�- N- OM -
- MN MN -
-N MI MO -
- NM -
- MI MI -
- MI MI -
-. MI =I -.
MIN MI MN
MN NM - --■ - MI
- i MI NM li NM NM MN N ,-
MI • - MI MN E MI NM : � - MI C
- - - - - --
— um — -- — —
am
— — NM MI III —
A — , — —
- OE MN
al 111
■
1111 ■
111111111111111111 - ■
■i■■i■ '■ 1111 ■ ■ ■■ 1111 ■■ ■■ ■ ■
■... ■ ■
■■ ■■ a a
■ ■ ■■ ■ *
■ ■ ■■ ■ ■
■■ _a ■ ■
a ■ ■a ■
■■■ a - ■
■ ■■ ■ '■
■ ■I
■ ■ '
■ ■ I
ME NM MI - -
- MIN - -
MOM MI , INIM MN MIN -
■ - -
- - -
MI MIN MN
imm
NM MN
- I•111 - - - '
— - -N MI
- - -
- - - -
- MN —
- RN -
— am
I.
1.1 1.• MI I—
— .. MI —
=I .1. —
MI Ell
�
— MN all —
•
•
NM
Moo
■ ��
MIN
EN —
1 MI
QM L. LIN•1IY
•011111
se'
i
3
A
V
ti
A
e10-4 47.3 O
P
•i•r
'yra, '"4qN
- ,
't+
�� -•
Aj fro `=
r'C 4.
C
S TS
o,
NO °SO 4'"
7 . N c.F W %(u y �••r,f /s Or No,
- 54 aso
11
rj/'Y -`.rt • r /�
•
•
•r a•
N'
m
•
i 1 "'
:►
955 37 6.9
ti . 7no s
•
w V
•
t
a O
o
5 i " 39'02_ /
- :�tt %rir3 - s Jj'
5S-I
.5-°651-COS J ;413 S•)
..._..`s R
(Ca Rd. A/o "'972, Mess Bros.
- -•..-._.r— T–
`
ISTF�►i'
r ~L. , :t.j Y 7' is .• � l
ie CU ELUTl9;�• •
2.11.04
A. P•I /9f76. -
r
S.
P. H. ` NO / C5 R S) P /PE LINE
UP W "AYkS:.- S.:/8Orr. Sr
AD yA G. E. ' •
%., . ,5 Lout 6JM7 ,
J
329.0 4
SLOPc E�Mr
rV
o L / 2 3 M. s S 343
quo
1312.10
/ 83. Lg
N.W. 35 -23 -4
SCALE: I INCH =100 FEET
-- - ; rri
• asoecy �.s' e/ as • s< < w
v e A �wrt'oar
— -- - -
\- S - OLD 4 '7 a—
\ 9i SF �� ..._ _
._ : 9 J �•° 6 Q .
i
9S5' '[ e� �+I ( 7 5• - ye'so - . .4 /
. J r
d.,. c � a
Of 0 �4 " off
�� 0 4 0 � 6
/ .0 0
ti
b
0
Vt1131C
•
9S'S' - A.
N
N
9*' P
110 '0/
;14 zs - -OS' L57Y✓
.ter 4 a
3�9 + �J‘ 5 :3
�
go o e.
r 2 i r aa . s',
o
ca • rc ms s; �
r
9/'59£
a
S co
• -;.
c
9 �\
'
r
SZ'
L
•
• ,vo oso 'Jo. "4 • 44
C-:/y 4
'
•
N .
.‘41)"4164.
. • - • .
, .
. • •
limiromiropirmitirriiiirrptornivirpirimititirrOtTITO
0 IS THS INC" 2 3 4
•
..-, .
's`e,.s
:. -. s....,.........,..• • " ,.
.'• :! . t
• •'...11••
•
4'• """.".".""P"41"...•.••44
5 6 7
FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW
A OE 6 BC LZ 9Z SE VZ C ZZ la 0 Z 61 131 a 91 Sl 4 71 CI Z1 11 0
.____3141,4111.09,001.01!
•'*
1
______ 0
-- --- - -- 7 -- - . 7—.
.
5 /' 39'02—.14/ 3.,'
...,- - ..‘
VS'• .------ 'i ' . R • ?---
i ....., _.,--- ... A ■ 7:4'
55 •? 4.1 456 re. ,
' I .4.-------
.' -------b-C -------- i ---."-
IA' - F .. _---- . ;r::::; .,. ""”. '' '
......---
...-----
_ t, -__ ---.--:-•,,, = •
__---
.. ,:,, , • Id -
.. ,,,s -
• x. .... •.., . ,
T1'7
THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 1-
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
i
1
j' : I ` r J pPiSTMC'• " *WI■OCA :“IZ
A) p Ia" t. 4 s GU
t ' +6 y t i q : A( : L•.1,1i 'ts115
t• S C4 �' G.,. we
+ er
V4 • o
• .a
.s
- c
J4 r:
A.
//
6 Re et OSM• • I ' -- - ---- A.P. 2S •Fa• /3
/
1 f _ NW. N.•Nw y I L • •
.vet 4..3 7W
r A •
-- `, . Spa =T
• -1
I
• A �.
Re
J� ' �.G�- 000
\„ a oV
V
1 * .c ••■,
o �
G , b.• qA.
• 0
j ' ' • ql^
1 y
365.16
P.5.N.1 "c 17'2E LI " SCALE: I INCH =100 FEET
a s., / BO >* sr •
d'ApNA 6 G .•'
i
. N.R7 d0 -S7w• _
FLEXIBLE RULER - 302AW.usu N
■
I !D " /1 t Asif /ON"'
quo
/RD elf
4.43
.43/ROB
0
•
11 I O R I T OT T ��
i
, r'
� Iii ii
0 N/H /INCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
I /O.Ot ir
N.W. 3523-4
• h
it.
/ \ `
B
O A 6.
3 4.
r2•1
447.!/ TO Co R.
V
l'
.. .�a.aa. � t.�. - y .5 JSF
y -
I " (M US/6 L RD. .. q 13 ,e B
`` 'r' — -- 2. G. X 70-•- _�++. Y ,•e-
.JOI.7�W.
w' A...L: A0 ,..? ?i / ./3.3 .... 7J ...w 4. 7 . �. 71.17
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESSi
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO I:.::
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
'.. ,
-IPI
• I, 4r)
.
• C12,e1P-K • f
1
.:
....'s • ,. .- : *
Cf.4•10.4 14-
7. • O ^19 '
. t.1.4.1Cg.P..Na C.Xfled 11.1..1.,
• ",
Fl-^9N..,11:q . ... "
C) PI.,.:••Ituoxy Lt "sub
. 1/ WI+ tU:..■
,
E.Ati TPV_1/2
,f2:1 NY 16 AG. „
\III i • egler.:•:7 e 0.6 .4., Q...upop, 6;
...it • t • . • LAWL1 •
— 1,2 1 41StnieNT 04.42
PARKING E•DLIMETH
PARKINS Pnoviosos
LANDSCAPE
•SITE PLAN
an%
11.74
• f
• ; ;Fr( 10
ti*
— ±rit
!fi
/
• ..,. v
r:,,:,-,,, . ' crPtt1"
1 " al 7 C.1... 4! • \an. 4:1.111.4 :.% '
J .
• • .
, PLITUPIN DEVELOPMENT
- lei '
r. • . ' •
.1.
-1Ternelr'n
. fltig•?, •
_
( tV
•
. l• a . . f • . ••••-,
Ls
• - . ' • • • LION. DEDOIINITDON • • • • • • . .
• •
..... • • .
%separate' of - tit SatitheiSt .. o .
f the Soutln'ttt '. of Settler' a. t..,. .
. .
• ship 23 north. Nano, 4 Cast. 11.N., and the Northeast • of the Nort.„,,
• al Section Is. Taanship 23 North, %sera Fait. Ch.. stco Cot s • NasnIntion.
. delcriON is toilers: . . •.
'
• 3*Siantol at Or iinrchraii iin'ne• of tsI4 Iciessact ,. i the .C.i.thddit 'i; .
' .7•imet North a/ Alit •lonethe North 1irte of seta so ,. of tn. '
et•rtlwest h a Sloan% of 451:fli -feet to Mr Vest ,,, oi . of :3J:hunter .
Partway 4nd the ooint of bellhoing; • , . .
. then. South 110 5 9 '33" ust .one 1.10 Jett •troin • dIstaae Of 41.21 f eu , : '
mares north 27 'hest a distance of 229.11 feet;
. thence Soutir.ae . gest a dlicinca of i37 fiat. ge, or lesi. to a
•. point so 1 lin. ■MEA 11 17.5 %et Co.ohnoitsrly or tire center :me of
•
1 19 foot railroad •asereet •stablish,' b/ Instrwent recorded one" . .
. Owl tor's File No. 6443573; . • .
' thence Northerly along a line Mich Is concertric attl :well.' ,,,t4 sate .
center line 461 feet. eon or less. to the ,10•:3 104. sgte iecting V— .
. thence North lifg4S•57: gest 113.1OS■14 %Ortn line a eiitinte a" 21 fee:.
• fore or leaf. to a paint on 1 tine rSlch is oirs11.1 It ic 1;1 t..,. •
aa•tleasterly 3f• the center tine of 1 19 e.e. rmlraai tatereet evablI
Of Init•urent recorded under auditor's Fit. la. tet3S13: .
thence North 16 last -lore sald parallel II•, /2 feet. ..0 dr 1 + , t. •
to the center line of a 0 r:ot drainer ge•eng.t .. e . 1 . .....1 :2 ..., t.t..r.t. ..,.
.114...nIngton br trstr.rents •e:ord./I wader 44Ottor's r %os. ea 9151t . .
thence Mall 5■1.3O last alast'saio dratrgor ease tette- 11n, as: , eet.
rot, or less. to the Nest line Of NO SOOt111.1“. '. of toe So,tn..e..! .. O 111.1
Secelon 26; .
' thence Ilorth 00°66'36' tist "II gest line 34-1.61 feet;
thence North 64:18 East .1511,15 feet to said gest -or pr. of Southcenter
. Portoey; , , '
. tht South 11 Fast along sale Skit margin 737.6 •e•t to Ono true'
point of Neatening; • . . .
. , .
•
Stteate le the City Of Tulw111. :Otleit, Of V.IfO. StAtIt Of :liShif.jtIO• •
I f
•
U-4
cuee
• ''
1 1 1 • 1
..a.197 -
'1)
1
,
, 2
2
LZL
it1=•."
.. '' I ' I ' (111111 - 1
- 1TIT1191 . 111 . 1 . 1 - 10 111111 I I 111
0 le Me INCH 2 3 I p lirilIMPT111111 ripilfirrpfl fill 41'0111 i (I
4 5 6 7
..„.
' •
'FLEXIBLE RULER - 302Aw
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS'
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
ITHE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAt. DOCUMENT
.;•
' 1 1
I - '•..
D6It.t tk r if, llFi: 174.N1 rot• :4
At r.-...
t
tIV. :IQ.k1;y 1 1.4441 '.Pte's
111
pez- , .).. , 4 O►•41G 11.44 +fart:..
.
.0
• ,
Ft,:ttWt•1c1 'trcee,-• ..
-
CtL- :c •,. pnw4.915 LI.T - r r. '
I / F 104Y,t41 g•.l<a •
F.VBhGPf.L.IJ 1Fefh
i a
-
Ge'Nra. ... ' .!4 : .4.) b'ec;
t•' •
wlr .r •:�:.,u: �' :••^^. *P
i
•
ter
Ie • 1'11
• 1,
r: 'ulFwl -ir -scat
, ms s,• ; : . •
• PUTS DEVELOPMENT
•
• C
\
1 /E.I� (' '�'• .� >? Fie.
Za.
f.J•
Yta:
. GWIL+i.'.•a 1MUM(
4Nt VW, 14
\ NY z• fat
tzt lUt
PARKINS PROVIDED.
IR- 1z -'1
• 6 ►. { \.ft: iatiJl,.t: ' �if:J r i 7f a • ` `,
i t I !•
i ! L1�
It o I ! ' '
P. I ! t• j�
. Der- f.4iRNTAYCMD�y MI 6? 7
PARKING REDUIRSOt 740 STALLS
LANDSCAPE
N� SIT PLAN
SCALE. 9N : 30'.ON
,
•
1 ti
e
959 STALLS,
•
4a•' •
t2R:
•
:1\3 r .,1
•
•las
/
/. :. , 0
,t•.f
•
tag•. r�
�r` RMC� . an
1 St`C "rte
E
' L/DAL DESCRIPTION
float portion of Me gaJthastt ', of the Soot. est 1 . of Section 26 town.
' Mip 23 Range a tau. Y.N., and the Northeast '• of the %rennet: L.
o f Sactien 3S.•TpnM10 21 North, Range a East, Y.N, sing Cant /. Yathkngton•
ds et16M as follow
2.Clening et the 'n.t..•l Corner of t.,id •artheait'. of ••,• •I h••''j •.;
• iw c. North 81 along Me North In of.slod Variants:. of the. •
NortAwlt.Y, a • distance N 481.09 /lot to the Yastarlln of :oatnceete• '
►■Aea► Vol Ma Wont of beginning: .'
thence Smith 11 fast along said 'Lett '.rgi.. I elstfnce an 41.27 fact:
, th91Ce North 8`^15'5 Weft a distance of 224.11 feet;
. • timd South'42 "West a distance of 337 feet, rare or lett,•to a
. , point on • line ankh it 11.5 feel aat•wastarla of the center Ilan a/
1 14 foot railroad enehent estaeitthed 6Y•IMLrutnt retordel unler
heoltor'S File No. 6644571;
Mena No,Marlf .1Cn4 a line onion It concentric and 7Lrtl1.1 with tail
center I Ina 4fiI feet. •o 1 or tetS • to !1 »? %0•t1 I me, laid 5, :t■n )5:
thence North 57 gent along slid north line a Sistence of M feet,
town or last, to a point on a line .nth It 74•81101 eitn and 7.5 frt
Lrtheesterly or the center line of a 19 tent rall•Jld e,s,nr't 'stint l:•N
aY inSVUOent recorded o,der AJ6I to file :n. 6613513:
thence North 16 Cast along :aid parallel line )2 feet. Tore or lest,,
to toe carter lone o• 143 foot drsiMr eI •••est n•rnt•. to •trt sir .. -
urinron Inar.rsntl ',carded ',na.. :.altars ^le 'ass a :11r.,t.
trance Nortn 50 .eft al:,; sflj er31gJC1 ,a%•••e «.. :ratan tine 12: 'tee.
n or' or less, to Mg gest Imo of LC* :OJtneeLt '. 3t the Sce.t.t :t . d' hid
Section 26;
Menet North 00 t.st atone till 1•%t 1•e. 111.61 •dot;
thou North 62dIe ^6' Ent 591.15 foot , to said fest v•uh of. iLulhrenttr
f IItaa /;
thence South 11 Ent along said vest eLe 4e 737.96 feet to Eno true
point of beginning;
Situate In the Cita of Tsaai I•• :aunty of 1Ins State of gwlr scan.
I t —
^
' t -LL
I ! ,
it
L
.
:3
4
m
BP -3
1511111NC/I • 2
FLEXIBLE RULER-302AWEiraa.,_
r ▪ `i^ao°"' : r.•Me•,« :t'CY" ", •f2. «. . , •,,, ^.1` ^.h"P.e".Su' ^.i7' ".r�^„r vac
14dt'i'", •'�•:... 1•rRf,•"I�.a +."�"61ff;r
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS•f
.CLEAR. THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT!
• -•1
MMI1.1140 Ncu! E
* TAURAN T
\ • . 'SITE •-.
90EIN0 PAPKINO
HE1 SaEING
MPAN_ Y .
9 STORY OFFICE BLDG
RR 6 000 BB. FT.
•
UNI
PAP
PLA
•
-- -
..... ., •' n ; I , xr r .:.rn.«.nm+n+rmw •'� d7sxfs l W i ,;t�;artpgr,::t"!'••
. » :�rk4n�. t.? .kl.. _w �•. yia` ..Ir " fi'f" "� t .�?°i?urn,L?q,e+,wa«1?fFF'7 n .: "
-:.��.� , � "!` "iTI° i`j�`i'ri `i � i j1` i ji °i�� i � i �� i .�. ( ��, ( �.�=� i .�.��� l .� a ; �ti�Yv� .� i .- i ,� ( :L i ��x ( .: i a: ���: •� ;(�� i �� i i �. . �.�. ,
imI��i���Tr�i i
i�l�i�i���rr��������ir14
0 HTHiINCH 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
FLEXIBLE RULER - 302 AW.77�
. x;? r± e. �r'> ewtrrYV; vx+ �??�y"f?wc'�a!itwr��e�- ua�.bsy rte.± leal. n% r�; Z7i!" r ;lrm�rn�;vr:.nrri�r «.W,nr:m+u+M! vans. ewcx.' rsc�aml ++++K?gew!.os.�.,tii.,�..•
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
•
L PARK'G
PL ANT'G.
PLANTTA . 18L
PARK'G
FLEXIBLE RULER -302AW N
'iGr�tii'N Wlw. 4Y'IiwtGy.,ia: J
MAMMIP
ti
d
w, `ru.,f we.:
. 30-
. z5 —
zo -
EXIT �OpD
ITOliitl T lT
`
0 IsmsIN.H 1 2
po x
�-E/W! 16 I•EQMI ±
PROPERTY LINE
P - r - Lt 'c : I TE SEC_T1OF -1
OF SOUTHCENTER .:.PKWY
SIDEWALK.
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT, .IS ,DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
: !j
•
. :
Peal P>: t. , a 4.1n 1-e.C.
4 .0 11 .. ri
r?t-.:..4... ii-+.4tf.f-C 144E 11.6(1;
_
,,......4,)7... ,•
ir.,, 7 ..
p..ii..,0,,•, ....
: ...r,44.,,...........r 1„.,..,
F1,, b **If 61:4 soc..co,
m#44..1 If af.l
, .. L.
,0,11
; 0,6. .
110"1411
-
1 !)"k- 1,7 w !4.11P5)
. •-
. ...
..:...::::. .. .;
1,0/1.1 ,.. .. : '. _ : ,, • "
.SCALtI An
we
'140 STALLS'
•935! STALLS ,
dal-7
• ;err.
feapro.54
;err" •
r...tmaTite`e!
r
"alkitt!
. irf,-1 •
. - • ' '
.. , • . .
, • . • .. .
:...11iet•portIon of. the Southeaet '. 0 the Southwest!. of Section 24; toen• -' •
"ship 23 North, lenge 4 Ent. U.N.: end the Northeast i. Of tne 'Orthecit
Of Section 3S. Township 23 North, knee 4 fast. U.N.. icing Count/. Wasninoten. .
. . Scribed as lotion: .
, .
. •
. . ,
arginning H Ile !Online: coruc• of ,.I4 lc rtecot `,' sf VIc *Co•thaelt '.; .
. .
thence North dr4S'S Jot along the North line of seta Northeast i:. or die •
., ;Ordvalet 1/4• die:Ince of :BIAS foot to die lest e.olir cf :s.tricenter .
Pero., and the point of'hoginsing; • ..
- thence South 114933^ east along sold West •irpin•s distance or 41.27 ',as;
thence north ena5.57* Nett 4 0111400 1 11 , 23..11. feet;
' thence South 4 .4est a dieUnce of S37 feet. .P., or los. tn a
. point In • lino Oath is 11.5 feet Sooth.;:iterly of the ',rt. !In. of • . '
a 10 foot railroad easene established I,/ inscrunent recorded 4nder .
ioditor file No. 6243S/I; ' ,
.
thence Northerly along • line Mich 11 concentric 1,1;e1:1.1 .IV; SW • • •
C,nt#1 461 lett• more or less. to 'he ho•0 III.e. ,11 iactI.1 V..
. thence North gra4S along said 'foam II, . oiswi, o• zg rw. „ •
enrc or less, to a point on 4 line ■4111C71 11 U1,1101 le111 11d 1..1 t..i...
Orthensterlr of the center lineal 4 11 4,1 eail,as ,,;ere: es•as11,..!
bf instrunint recorded saner Audi tor.s.f Ile %s. Onl3e731
dime North 16 Cot •leg 1414 parallel 1:.re )2 feet. , to or
• to the center tine of a 4,7 f At drainer el V7 14 :Je Ste, e
,114;nincton to irstrronts , etor.ie.i , ..nder Auditor': file 'Os. et13S:s. .
theme Nsi•tn SOM. n• Jest *last sato frorace ease-eo: tette^ el, ' 'eet. '
arm or los, to ter Nest line of the SC,Ithe,•:. ,„ of int So.:r...eit .. of i lid .
Section 26; .
thence North 0015'36 tot along said •est line 344.61 'est:
thence North la:13'16' East 330.1S feet to said eel: - wt. , of lo■ancenter .
faraway:
/AM St/1 11 Eaet along said Melt enroll; 737.% feet to tne trve
point of beginning; / . .
. • .
Situate en the tit of %sails. :aunts of tiro. State or ostirgtoe.
. .. .. . .._ . . , ' . •
CISSONNPITION
tit.14iir-vAr
1 : ".' '
II1111111)PIIIIIIIIIIIIIIflinT11111
1 •
3
FLEXIBLE RULER - 302 AW
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS(
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO-
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT'
•
I.
: •
•
t•
I
wwwwwwwwwwww
• • ..... ••
`II> •
t 1 k. 24 1' I
• ri•Tit•r,
\., UiL WO.L. I./
fit 6.4
ttms
fa,
.. •
I, '•. Cfrwtr.r.' IR4o,
••••,s S
-r •
r.VatiCt..;;
t.:
LANDSCAPE
NO SITE PLAN
•CA
4
r-w • ••,,-• •
• \ •
••
,
•uu
‘q.)
' •
.r
• 4°i
234s6gerfet-4=Cswl 1
PARKINS RIOUIREDI 740 STALLS
PARKING PROVIDED I 959 STALL• ,
, Orr
0 IN " 2 3
1
• 4'1)
• ••
.t.t3.,••••••••
pgA2,-tisi
.•
IQ
,:o•
t.t.
I '
- •
I
I
•
•••
• •
1 i I ,
„..1.•
I ' I
e_.
0.4 Q*
,
• :9
s. s
*
•
rt5
. •
•
pp
are 70o
t t."-: •
tru4, / r. 1 14,1
.auz
e,',T 7 at 1
• P.m. 011VIIILOPMINT
it •
FLEXIBLE RULER -302 ALWril,
• -- (g)••
• ..._4,...•••••""
„ JUT .
1 .to
IfiTOTOPTI
7 8;
•
I
•
•
• <
-
' • 1)
rt
___:-,„......:4.,,,,..•,
,) 4 ttI V• • • .'t• 1
ft. .,.. ...... .,;,, •
.........k,..... . i. :, ..i,,
-.'•"• r • - '. -:-. ,... "T 4 ... ,,, .: • '
' .
• .
_ he
• r""
•
• 7
• ,I .
/4
r (11.S i 1 ,
- 9 n•
.i'
Q , • t , •
.• ; ,, ,., __. 1 1'
1 . t
ova . . .
• I •
,„,....."•,,,,, ,mt!,- . deem"... , , , „ ,4 )
I .
'h, T . ..w L. wwww,i Ca
.. • +...: 4c s t 1 44, e .• • •i ". . 5* !•1. 11 1‘111 1 :1 6; ;, 1 1 ! :11 11 4 , '0•1\
....,... ..,.... . ! ...
f...-W tun..W:4" ..." '..^_''.. „... ••• ••• .. t i.,,,..
!.••• .. . 4 .1 . .1{1) 4
'''''..---' .1111.1WW .d.r... 1 •-... ,....
,..t.{..1
"** k i, • - ' 1•i•
•
/NS j, ; •--
si
Treacly .41ww..... •
w. • 7 "
/ •',
Z , %. 4"'e • , C41 .
• .
• R 3
le- t
• -- ;LS I F11 3
•• 1
,
is• f,....,%we. ii, ' t
".....t t- , ..t. ri., I -tt-,-..:.!, ! 11 . 1 . 1 .. r .. 1 .. ; 7... .....•
.
...
. • ••• i 1 .1_ A 1. 1 4 . ::
TA.LZ1
i.... ,
•17‘,-”, f. 'le:,
••• 0. Ito* • Is'Y C•
t `i•r: ! 4I.IJ . . siirr
\ s• a
.-.• •
LIIISAL
• • •
That portion of the Soothent of the Southwest . of Section 28. Town.
ship 23 North. Range a Cut. U.N., and the Northeast • of vie Northwest •
of Section 35. Townshlp 21 North, Range I Cut, king COUP,. anhington
describ•d l fallow, •
2. sluing at the 'eutnwmt corner of s.1,1 •Strth....t :w;:- .ht ..•
thence North 8/otS•S1 est along the North 1ln. of surf Northeast of tne
Northwest S. distute of It3l.05 feet to tne West gulf.. of taatnconter
Pour UP the Odin: of beginning;
thence South lloS3•31• East along said :lest waroln elst;nce 0 11.27 , antt
tuns. north 87"15'Ss• wit t a nIstece of 224.11 fest;
• thence Sowth ..:011-0•• . distance c in feet. 00e or leSs.•to
. Point On a linc ulch Is 113 „et. Soar,stule of the cent, it., of
a 14 fan railroad easuent ettanlished Or Instricent •wsorael WISP'
Ouoisor•s file go. 66.13i7at
. thence florthul, alowp p line hnIch It concentric awl 0rI11.1 olth uid
cuter line 461 feet. N." or lets, to 'no sn•r• 1114 . •414 ia.tton.
tome North sTs ust along utd.u.th Imo .1 Pittance of 20 feet..
re• n or lett. to I its•int on 1 line ••Icn Is cwssItr• •ten and D.0 t
• gusfunterly of the center line of 4 PS „et ralIwam useorns
by tnit•twent recoreei oder A,PItc FI SIP, 65:15/1:
tnence :WM 16.18•SS• fast along tatJ oarollel Ilse 55 feet. hore or :sta.
to 5•1 certer lin. 0' I 43 drUnuw •i••••••nt new,: to re
•a.wi•gt• ba inttrur•-ts 4114t• 4 4:11t.lr • I I eollSta.
tr.,. %Cr:. S0.1 1.2'.4%; 1101; Slit dramas!, taservt sen,ew .2: 'pet.
auto t. St.
pp.., Ie
e SS line of the •• of *0, 5., trtwoit • 0 o
, to
nt..
chute Yorth 1E' E•st •Iona :31 dot; I,. Its.1
thence gortn Sast•S93.15 feet to said jot -wry, of Saulncente•
Portwa,;
thence South 11°S)•10 fltt along . S41,1 West •sugin 737.56 feet to the true
Point Of beginning:
Situate In the [It t Ttowili. tauntp of king. State
SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
•
•
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS NE
:THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
VA ,
I; 1
Ott
, I •
i •
2 5 ?
..-••••• • •\„.
C.UW;\ • '
*ti' u
\•
\ • !. .
• ••41.1,
\ ,
• ,
. VRA2Fri
its
•
,p •
• ;
, INN • ,••••••■•••••••■•=••■■ ! .......,.. --•■• • ••••" • • •
/' • •
•
, .‘ • TFPrE,
11 .1:11
,15
. .4
IIIIIIIIIITVIVIIIIII110111r111911111111 rrniritritilitirlfliiIIIITITPIIIIITPITRII01
0 "m"meN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8H.
FLEXIBLE RULER AW haTrThr
.1.AFCO, :CATALOG SHOWROOM
'olypsioN oF MODERN MEACHAM:NINO:
•
U NIT
AD
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
. 1
• . •
• • .
•
•
•
: 30 —
:ZS
ZO
MA:Ag.4.0
cP r<Av
yr.? —
OF
1,7
I . GAV
5 5ERm±-5
PROPERTY I_It.IE
t7r.k EC21
PARK'G
pLpirti
SIDEWALK
SOUTHCENTER ..PKW*
Pg. 12.-11
I. ?H$ INCH
2
4
PLANTTit
PARK%
7 1 1 1771 1 1
FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW
. . , . .. • • ' - • .'• . .. . .
. .
• ,•
•;,.;
.
FIRE . LANE.
RA. TRACKS
,
OFFICE: BLDG.,.
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS POE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
• . ;