HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 77-35-V - PETER SKARBO - SIDEYARD VARIANCE77-35-v
16705 southcenter parkway
skarbo peter variance
PLANNING
PARKS L
RECREATION
BUILDING
12 September 1977
Mr. Peter Skarbo
1420 Second Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: Variance Application @ Srtuthcenter Parkway
Dear Mr. Skarbo:
Gary Crutch ield
Assistant lanner
GC /ch
cc: Mayor Bauch
Dir, OCD
Bldg Off
The Tukwila Board of Adjustment, at its regular meeting of 1 September 1977,
conducted a public hearing to consider your application for variance from
Section 18.30.040 (Side Yard Setback) of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC).
The Board, upon due consideration of all testimony received during the hearing
and based on the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report, wholly granted
the variance from Section 18.30.040 (TMC) only if the subject parcel of property
is reclassified for commercial use. Hence, this variance will not be recognized
by this office in the absence of commercial zoning.
This correspondecne shall constitute variance authorization in compliance with
the stipulation explained hereinabove and must accompany application for build -,
ing permit.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincer;ly,
6230 Southcenter. Boulevard u Tukwila, Washington 98188 a (206) 292 -2177
PARA3 6
RECREATION
CITY of TUKWILA
OFFICE of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Minutes of the Meeting, 1 September 1977.
The regular September meeting of the Tukwila Board of Adjustment was called
to order at 8:00 P.M. by Chairperson Altmayer with Board members Johanson,
James, Goe and Duffie present. Gary Crutchfield represented the Planning
Division.
Chairperson Altmayer called for approval of minutes noting that both the June
and July minutes require action.
Motion by Mr. Duffie, seconded by Mr. James and carried to approve the June
minutes as presented.
Motion by Mr. James, seconded by Mr. Duffie and carried to approve the July
minutes as presented.
Mr. Johanson abstained from voting on both motions as he was not present at
either of the two meetings.
Chairperson Altmayer questioned the progress of the study on undergrounding of
utilities. Mr. Crutchfield explained that due to the current and projected
workload the study has not as yet begun but hopes to submit report to the Mayor
in October.
Chairperson Altmayer introduced and welcomed new member Mr. Reid Johanson to
the Board.
NEW BUSINESS
IANCE: Side Yard Setback (Skarbo)
Chairperson Altmayer opened the Public Hearing at 8:10 P.M. and Mr. Crutchfield
read the application and Staff Report.
Mr. John Mahlum, architect representing the applicant, stated he had nothing to
add to the Staff Report but would answer any questions.
6230 Southcl:nLer Boulevard a Tukwila, Washington 93188 a (206) 242 -2177
Board of Adjustment Page 2
Minutes 2 September 1977
Mr. Goe pointed out that were the Puget Power site zoned C -2, this variance
application would not be necessary.
Mr. Crutchfield noted that alternative had been recommened by Staff to the
applicant but nothing had evolved in that respect. Mr. Mahlum confirmed Mr.
Crutchfield's comment and further explained that the Skarbo project could not
wait for a decision from Puget Power.
Mr. Johanson stated he felt the most appropriate means would be a rezone of the
Puget Power site; however, the Skarbo project would be unduly delayed by such
an action. Therefore, this variance appears appropriate inasmuch as the public
welfare is not adversely affected.
Board discussed precedent - setting effect concluding this is a unique case and
will not establish an undesirable precedent.
Motion by Mr. Goe, seconded by Mr. James and carried that based on the Findings
and Conclusions of the Staff Report the Board wholly grant the variance from
the eight -foot side yard requirement of Section 18.30.040 if the parcel is re-
classified for commercial use.
Chairperson Altmayer, noting the Public Hearing had not been formally closed,
did so at 8:35 P.M.
VARIANCE: Parking Requirement (Doubletree Inn)
Mr. James stated he knows the applicant, Mr. Timothy DuBois, as a result of
working with Mr. DuBois as a member of the Natural Environment Element Commit-
tee of the proposed Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Crutchfield stated such a relation-
ship does not constitute disqualification.
Chairperson Altmayer opened the Public Hearing at 8:40 P.M. and Mr. Crutchfield
read the Staff Report.
Mr. Timothy DuBois, Doubletree Inn, stated a great deal of research had gone
into the Parking Variance Proposal and would answer any questions the Board
may have. Introduced Mr. Bob Smith, architect for proposal, who displayed and
explained drawings depicting site and elevation plans and extent of multiple use.
Mr. Goe questioned the anticipated number of employees at the freestanding
restaurant. Mr. Smith indicated about 15 persons would be employed by the
individual restaurant.
Board questioned statistics on the peak parking demand and actual counts. Mr.
Smith displayed the peak demand graphs found in the application and Mr. DuBois
explained the shifts of peak parking demand. Essentially, their peak parking
demand occurs twice daily, once at noon and again at about 9:00 P.M.
Chairperson Altmayer questioned the rationale for adjusting the explicit Code
requirement for 1 parking space for each room of a hotel or motel. Mr. Crutchfield
explained the principal factor leading to adjustment is the common occurrence rate
of hotel room guests arriving from the airport to attend a one to three day conven-
1 September 1977
AGENDA ITEM I V A :
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
SIZE:
ZONE:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
FINDINGS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DIVISION
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
STAFF REPORT
'AA/ !
8:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE (SKARBO)
VARIANCE from side yard setback (18.30.040 TMC)
Peter Skarbo, 1420 Second Avenue, Seattle 98101
Immediately North of Puget Power Substation on west
side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1100 feet
south of Strander Boulevard.
+ 32,000 square feet
R -1 and C -2
INDUSTRIAL (Existing Plan)
COMMERCIAL (Proposed Plan)
The applicant has applied for rezone from R -1 to C -2 for the total site and
this application is predicated on favorable action by the City with regard to
the commercial zoning on the entire parcel.
A c C loo AL
1. Assuming favorable action by the City Council regarding the applicant's
petition for reclassification, the subject parcel and surrounding parcels
are zoned as depicted in Exhibit A.
2. The actual use of parcels is depicted in Exhibit B.
3. A Special Use Permit granted in July 1973 to Puget Power authorized con-
struction of an electrical substation on that parcel indicated in Exhibit B
as owned by Puget Power.
4. The development of the substation provided a 30 -foot wide side yard on the
north portion of the Puget Power property.
5. According to Puget Power's Substation Division in Renton, the minimum
expected lifetime of the substation is forty (40) years.
Board of Adjustment Page 2
Staff Report 1 September 1977
6. The applicant has proposed development of a retail outlet on the subject
parcel as depicted in Exhibit C.
7. Section 18.30.040 (TMC) requires no side yard in the commercial zone
UNLESS the commercial parcel abuts or adjoins a residentially -zoned parcel,
in which case the commercial development is required to provide an eight -
foot wide side yard.
8. All parcels located north of the Puget Power site are zoned C -2 (Commercial).
Ultimate development under 18.30.040 could result, theoretically, in no side
yards.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The variance shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent
with the limitation upon uses of other properties in the vicinity and in
the zone in which the property on behalf of which the application was filed
is located;
CONCLUSION: All parcels north of the subject site are zoned commercial and
development thereunder has the right to place buildings on the side property
line. Hence, the granting of the variance to allow placement of the proposed
building on the side property line would not constitute a grant of special
privilege which the nearby commercial parcels do not enjoy.
2. That such variance is necessary because of special circumstances relating to
the size, shape, topography, location or surrounding of the subject property,
to provide it with use rights and privileges permitted to other properties in
the vicinity and in the zone in which the subject property is located;
CONCLUSION: Residential zones assume residential development. In this case,
the residential zone adjacent the south line of the subject parcel is used
for an electrical substation, the minimum lifetime of which is expected to
be 40 years. Since commercial developments are normally not required to pro-
vide side yards between non - residential developments, the variance is necessary
because of the non - residential development of the residential zone.
3. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant;
CONCLUSION: The fact that the residentially -zoned parcel located immediately
south has been developed to a non - residential character cannot be attributed
to the applicant.
4. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity
and in the zone in which the subject property is situated;
wib
Board of Adjustment Page 3
Staff Report 1 September 1977
CONCLUSION: The substation development includes a 30 -foot wide side yard
along its north property line, far in excess of any side yard required under
the commercial development restrictions. The nearest residential development
is located at least 250 feet south of the subject parcel and residential
development of the Puget Power site cannot be reasonably expected even in
the long term. Hence, granting the variance will neither be materially
detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to surrounding properties
or improvements.
5. The authorization of such variance will not adversely affect the implemen-
tation of the comprehensive land use plan;
CONCLUSION: Since both the existing and proposed Comprehensive Land Use
Plans promote, respectively, either industrial or commercial developments
all along the west side of Southcenter Parkway and neither of the Plans
promote maintenance of the residential uses existing more than 250 feet
south of the subject parcel, granting the variance will not have an adverse
effect on either of the Plans.
6. That the granting of such a variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant possessed by the
owners of other properties in the same zone or vicinity.
CONCLUSION: The right to place a building on the side property line is a
substantial one for commercial developments and is enjoyed by all other
commercially -zoned parcels situated north of the subject site. Unless the
side yard requirements will mitigate the effects of commercial development
adjacent to a residential use, a variance from such setback requirement is
necessary to provide this property with a substantial right enjoyed by sur-
rounding commercially -zoned properties.
SUMMARY
The existence of the residential classification, in this case, is overridden by
the actual use of the adjacent property as well as both of the Comprehensive Plans.
The provision of an eight -foot side yard by this development adjacent town exist-
ing 30 -foot side yard provided by a long -term electrical substation is superfluous
and the requested variance is necessary to provide the subject parcel with use
rights enjoyed by similar properties in the vicinity, assuming the property is
reclassified to C -2.
RECOMMENDATION: 66-e, I 3 U -S
Based on the Findings and Conclusions contained in.this Report, Staff recommends
the variance from the eight -foot side yard requirement of Section 18.30.040 (TMC)
be wholly granted ant -y. if the parcel is reclassified for commercial use.
exhibit a
skarbo variance
exhibit b
skarbo variance
first floor plan site plan
exhibit c
section a0a
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
ss.
Marg'.8r et...Eai1b8.U,gb being first duly sworn on
oath, deposes and says that)$.h.P.. is the C b f . . . .:1ex'k of
THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4)
times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news-
paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington,
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton
Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County,
Washington. That the annexed is a ..:la.ic.e...o.f....ubli.a
Hearing
as it was published in regular issues (and
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
of 3 consecutive issues, commencing on the
.1.9 day of A.1.1(. U.B ,1977 , and ending the
3 day of August ,19.. both dates
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub -
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of 16.;.14.8, which
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
41g.ut , 1971...
V.P.C. Form No. 87
.01.4.0.0,,L4A1cue.
cbiol
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3 . 1 day of
nd for the State of Washi
residing at Kent, King
Notary Publle
— Passed by;the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June
9th,. 1955.
— Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the zlewspapers of the State.
J
ton,
ounty.
MAHUTM
MAHLUM
NOR S ARCHITECTS
10 August 1977
Mr. Gary Crutchfield
Assistant Planner
City of Tukwila
6230 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Reference: Skarbo Applications for Rezone & Variance
Subject: Neighboring Property Owners
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
Per your request, the following is a list of property owners within 300 feet of
Mr. Skarbo's property:
1. Puget Sound Power & Light
Real Estate Division
Puget Power Bldg.
Bellevue, Washington 98009
2. Alstores Realty Corp.
7o Le' Roy Miller
P. 0. Box 12510
Seattle, Washington 98111
3. Bon Marche
Wilbur Fix
3rd & Pine Street
Seattle, Washington 98104
4. Matt Mikana
16813 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, Washington 98188
5. Irvin A. Iverson
950 Andover Park East
Tukwila, Washington 98188
We trust this information is as you require.
JM /ey
cc: Mr. Skarbo
File
C
A Prollreekmal HenlceCanorNla.
Edward M.hlam MA C81
.Iohn Mahlam A1A
%inventNordlbr. A1A
x114 Thonrtolse W
Swill, V..9819O
904119134131
1 September 1977
(date)
CITY OF TUKWILA •
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
8:00 P.M.
(time)
Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th
Avenue South, to consider .,a VARIANCE from the SIDE YARD SETBACK requirement
on a parcel of property generally located between Interstate 5 Freeway and
Southcenter Parkway and approximately 1000 feet south of Strander Boulevard'
All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard.
Gary Crutchfield, Secretary
Tukwila Board of Adjustment •
For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at 242 -2177.
Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on
19, 24 & 31 August 1977 .
Puget Sound Power & Light,
Real Estate'DiVi.sion
Puget Power Bldg.
Bellevue, WA 98009
Alstores Realty Corp.
c/o Le Roy Miller
P.O. Box 12510
Seattle, WA 98111
Bon Marche
c/o Wilber Fix
3rd & Pine St.
Seattle, WA .98104
AFFIDAVIT
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
19
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at
Matt Mikani.
16813 Southcenter Parkway
Tukwila, WA 98188
Irvin A. Iverson
950 Andover Pk. E.
Tukwila, WA 98188.
I, • Gary Crutchfield , being duly sworn, hereby declare that all legal
notice requirements of Title 18 have been ful-
filled and a notice has been mailed to each of the following addresses.
1 September 1977
(date)
CITY OF TUK4'WILA •
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
8:00 P.M.
(time)
Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th
Avenue South, to consider ; a VARIANCE from the SIDE YARD SETBACK requirement
on a parcel of property generally located between Interstate 5 Freeway and
Southcenter Parkway and approximately 1000 feet south of Strander Boulevard.
All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard.
Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle an
Gary Crutchfield, Secretary
Tukwila Board. of Adjustment
For further information contact. Gary Crutchfield at 242 -2177.
19, 24 & 31 August 1977 .
Astarte
ne,laarn
Received From
Address P117
c: r
_ Dollars
�� cam_ Y9 D-V
f r
Af:T. C :F
ACCOUNT
AMT. A'.'CD
CA:AF
D'JE
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
AMT. PAID
BALANCE
DUE
r C E 1,
Received From
Address
For
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
AMT. FAID
BALANCE
DUE
For
Atli OF
ACCOUNT
AUT. PAID
'ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
RECEIPT
Received From
Address
ACCOUNT
CASH
CHECK
MONEY
CEDER •
For —
CASH
CHECK
MONEY
ORDER
CASH
CHECK
MONEY
ORDER
CHECK..
BALANCE MONEY
DUE CFDEEP.
Ua T e ye -,.-:
HOW PAID
•
Date
HOW PAID
.Date'
•
HOW PAID
HOV! PAID
CASH
0
•
RECEIPT V 19 6730.
Received Frorn��
AddressJ% D
By
•
By
19
Dollars $
Dollars $
6731
Date 19
Dollars
\
'J
6
•
tukwila INDUSTRIAL COUNC I L
VICINITY MAP
MAHLUM MAHLUM & NORDFORS ARCHITECTS
•SKPJS FURNITURE BUILDING
REVISIONS
1
,K ION A PAGE .1 PSP 1
NG & SITE PLANS,
V O ATIONS, SFLTION5
•
C
MAIILUM
MAHLUM
Se V\Rc ARCHITECTS
Attachment No. 2
Application for Variance
A re. .tonal *Mee CanonI lan
Edward Magnin MA CRl
John Mahlon' A1A
%7neee& Nonillion Al A
XIII Thorne W
' w
1 X83•4121
Applicant: Mr, Peter Skarbo
The following are in response to application questions #1 -4.
1. No incompatible effects are foreseen. The land to the north is zoned C -2,
and the adjoining land to the south is developed as a power substation
which is a use visually compatible to this proposed use. The land across
the street is zoned Industrial Park.
The site will be landscaped in a manner compatible with other developments
in the area.
2. It is our understanding that the adjacent street is developed to City
standards.
3. The proposed project will connect to municipal storm sewer and water
services and to a sanitary sewer being provided by the land owner to the
north.
4. The applicant has applied for reclassification of the R -1 portion of his
property to C -2.
5. All usable land around the site for a considerable distance is designated for
Commercial Use on the Preliminary Land Use Plan Map. However, there is an area
of land to the south currently zoned R -1, and it is.our understanding that the
boundary of that R -1 district adjoins the applicant's south property line.
The applicant is requesting a variance from a requirement of the C -2 zone which
would necessitate an 8 Fr side yard where adjoining an R -1 district.
Compliance with the above requirement would produce an unnecessary hardship
because:
a. The property immediately south of the applicant's property, while zoned R -1,
is developed as an electrical power substation. This use is non - residential,
and would be compatible with this propsed project.
b. It appears self - evident, from the City's Comprehensive Plans and the nature
of developments already accomplished in the general vicinity, that the
adjoining R -1 District will eventually be zoned and developed with commercial
land uses.
c. The applicant thus has the prospect of being the only commercial use property
in the area required to provide a side yard.
Application for Variance (continued)
It is our suggestion that granting of this variance would not constitute a grant
of special privilege, since it would only enable development of the applicant's
property consistent with the limitations on the other commercial properties in
the vicinity.
The variance is necessary because of the applicant's property location next to
an R -1 district which is planned for commercial use, and immediately adjoing a
property of that R -1 district developed non - residentially as an electrical sub-
station. This location produces a side yard requirement unique to this property
and apparently of short duration,
The above conditions and circumstances are not resultant from the applicant's
actions.
Granting of this variance would not be detrimental to public welfare, The sub-
ject requirement is conceived essentially to protect residential land uses from
the effects of commercial land uses. The applicant's property does not adjoin
a residential land use: instead, it adjoins a very compatible, non - residential
use.
Granting of the variance would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The variance would enable the applicant to fully develop his property in a
manner comparable to that of other commercial property owners in the vicinity.
I, Peter Skarbo , being duly sworn, declare that I am the
contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that
the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the information herewith
submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Main 2-0673
(Telephone)
Subscribed and worn before me
�... ...
AFFIDAVIT
(Signature of Contract Purchaser or owner)
1420 Second Avenue
• (Mailing Address) 1,. ;
• •t . l.�.
Seattle Washi 98101
City State � „!
1977.
No ; b "c in and •r the :state of Washington,
•
legal description
Attachment No. 1
!'};at portion of the nort'i' "st quarter of Section 2F., Township 23 North,
Range 4 East, 4. i•:. described as follows:
Deainning at the southwest: corner of said subdivision;
thence South 89°21'31" East along the south 1 ine thereof 1961.64
feet to the west margin of 57th Avenue South (Mess frothers Road) ;
thence North 00'09'22" lest along said west margin 250.01) feet;
thence North 89°21'31" 4est 6.00 feet to the west marcrin of. 57th
Avenue South, as widened by deed from :couthcenter cort) oration to City
of Tukwila and the true point of beginning;
thence continuing North n0°21'11" lest. 737.50 feet to the easterly
margin of Primary State ,hghway : :o. 1, its condemned in United States
District court Cause Rio. 6010;
thence North 45 "04'23" i• :ast. 77.10 feet along said easterly marciin to
an angle point therein;
thence North 12 "46'41" ' ?past, along said easterly margin 106.52 feet to
an angle point therein; T
Thence North 23 , along said easterly margin 129.77 feet to
an angle point therein;
thence northerly along said easterly margin along a curve to the left,
the center of which bears North 7(1:'43' ] 9" 'hest SIMENIMMIldirs, having
a radius of 6029.59 feet an arc distance of 631.42 feet;
thence South 84°41'19" East, alone] said easterly margin 30.00 feet to
an angle point therein;
thence North 04"19'17" East, ar].onri said easterly margin 265.00 feet to
an angle point therein;
thence North 45 "42'47" ':ast, along said easterly margin 03.51 feet to
the westerly margin of 57th Avenue South, as conveyed to the City of
['igcwila by deed recorded under Auditor's File No. 573' 901, records of
King County, Washington;
thence South 00 ° 23'45" East :, along said westerly margin 234.43 feet;
thence South 00°34'46" East, along said westerly margin as widened
840.79 feet; eAvr
thence South •00°09'22"0111.• , along said westerly marni.n 150.00 feet
:o the true point of beil inn i.ng .
i
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of '
TaP 26R4PN /C M4P
/ 4' WN �(. / eiPS N F U E 76 304
SOUTWCIW?ER f Y'�� ..F�Y f i4'O/1CflY A7"STA%VI2Ei°&VD SCALE / Y1 7,
OWN ,NC.
CHADWICK SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CKD
4011 STONE WAY NORTH, SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98103 832 -3388 APPD
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
F i l i n g Date 8
Z
Appl. No. 71 Planning Cc.,rrin.iss_i.c.n Action
lRece.ipl. No.. (,olio
Hearing Date _ _21//2J
I r I!:L !0!I POY 1 t,PInalr'tr,
City Council Ac Lien
Ordinance No &: Date
APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY:.
Narne Mr. Peter Skarbo Address 1420 Second Avenue
Form LI
___,_ ,�P tle. Waahing R}i.ISL 'I'etephcne No. Main 2 -0673
Property Petitioned for vd ri anue is 1 oea Led on Southcenter Parkway
between North of and adjoining Puget Power Substation
Total square footage in property Approximately 31,500 SF
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
See Attachment No.1
Vicinity see Attachment No. 3
enure property C -2)
Existing; Zoning C -2 and R -1 (Aaplicant is in the process of requesting rezone to make.
What aro the uses you propose to develop on this property?
Retail furniture sales facility.
Variance is requested for less than required side yard.
Number of permanent off - street. parking :spaces that will be provided on property?
38 Number required 38
NOTICE 'I'0 AF'1't,ICAN'l': The following factors are con-
sidered in reclassifying properly or ntOdifying regula-
tions. Evidence or additional information you desire
to submit. to substantiate your request may be attached
to this sheet. Wee Application Procedure sheet Item
for No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.)
1. What provisions wi.11 be" made to screen adjacent, and surrounding property from =.ny
irncompati.ble effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification
See At achment NO,2
•
2. What provisions will be made Lo provide for necessary street widening to' City
minimum standards? See Attachment No.2
3. What provisions will be made for adequate sewer and water service?
See Attachment No.2
4. Any other comments which !he petitioner feels are appropriate:
5, t'Jl`laL hardship. thi& vetsi inee (necessary?
A1.tasaimet No . 2
'h -35 -V
1l0305 200THcedsrwt p
mahlum mahlum & nordfors
skarbos furniture building
site plan
elevation section