HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 75-23-R - ANDERSON - REZONEMF 75-23-R
WEST SIDE SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 600 FEET SOUTH OF STRANDER BOULEVARD
ANDERSON REZONE
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
April 22, 1976
CITY of TUKWILA
Mr. Harvey Anderson
P.O. Box 88074
Tukwila, Washington 98188
RE: Your rezone request on Southcenter Parkway
Dear Mr. Anderson:
At the last regular Council meeting of April 19, 1976, the City Council
approved your rezone request per the attached ordinance with the condi-
tions as shown in the attached developer's agreement executed between
you and the City.
The developer's agreement attached with this letter is not executed or
filed. As you know, the original developer's agreement has been executed
and is now in the process of being filed with the King County Department
of Records and Elections. At such time as we get a copy back of the
recorded developer's agreement the City will honor building permits or
other permits requested.
Very truly yours,
Kjell Stoknes
Planning Director
KS /cw
Attachments: Ordinance
. Developer's Agreement
cc: File #MF 75 -23 -R
Eayarb. Bauch, Mayor
14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON 98067
April 8, 1976
KS /cw
Attachment
Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor
CITY OF TU KWI LA
14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON 98067
Mr. Harvey Anderson
P.O. Box 88074
Tukwila, Washington 98188
RE: Your Rezone Request on Southcenter Parkway
Dear Mr. Anderson:
Very truly yours,
Kj 1 Stoknes
Planning Director
cc: City Attorney
File #MF 75 -23 -R
At the last regular Council Meeting of April 5, 1976, the Tukwila City
Council made the first reading of the proposed ordinance which would
approve your rezone. Council procedures require two readings of an
ordinance with adoption occurring with the second reading.
Our City Attorney is presently drafting a developers agreement for your
review and signiture which would incompass the recommendation of the
attached Staff Report dated 15 March 1976. The item referenced here is
the 7 recommendations in the later part of the Staff Report. As soon as
I receive this developers agreement I will contact you so you can come
in and review the agreement and have time to sign it prior to.the next
Council meeting.
The Council has indicated that they will not do second reading and adopt
the ordinance until such time as the developers agreement has been signed
by you. After the developers agreement has been signed by the necessary
parties and the rezone ordinance approved by the City Council, it will be
necessary for you to have the developers agreement recorded with the King
County Department of Records and Elections and a copy returned to the City
of Tukwila Planning Department.
Edgai'D. Bauch, Mayor
CITY or TUKWIL_A
14475 - 59TH AVENUE SOUTH
TUKWI LA, WASHINGTON 98067
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting, 26 February 1976.
The regular February meeting of the Tukwila Planning Commission was called to
order at 8:15 P.M. by Chairman Mettler. Commissioners present were: Mr. Kirsop,
Mr. Link, Mr. West, Mr. Bohrer and Mr. Bowen. Kjell. Stoknes and Gary Crutchfield
represented the Planning. Department.
Chairman Mettler introduced Mr. Lionel Bohrer and Mr. Richard Bowen as two newly
appointed Commissioners.
Mr. Kirsop suggested replacing the word "business" with "corporate headquarters"
in the second to last paragraph on page 4 of the minutes of the 29 January 1976
meeting.
Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. Kirsop and carried to approve the minutes
of the 29 January 1976 meeting as corrected above.
IV A - City Council Actions
Mr. Crutchfield read Staff Report informing the Commission of Council actions
taken during the past month related to planning matters.
V A - Comprehensive Plan Review
Mr. Crutchfield noted the Comprehensive Plan is progressing on schedule and
completion is anticipated in accordance with the Flow Chart.
V B - Elections
Mr. Mettler was re- elected Chairman by acclamation.
Mr. Kirsop was re- elected Vice - Chairman by acclamation.
Mr. blest was elected Secretary by acclamation.
Planning Commission Page 2
Minutes of the Meeting 26 February 1976
VI A - PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE - R -1 to C -2 (Anderson)
Mr. Stoknes pointed out the subject property on the city map and Chairman
Mettler opened the Public Hearing at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Crutchfield read entire
Staff Report including Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation.
Mr. Larry Canaan, representing Mr. Anderson who had not arrived yet, asked
if there was any time table to develop a gravity flow system for sanitary
sewerage.
Mr. Stoknes explained there was not and that it would depend on the rate of
development in that particular vicinity since it takes 60% of the property to
be served to form an LID.
Mr. Kirsop asked about the Bon Marche Distribution Center manner of sewerage?
Mr. Stoknes stated he was not sure how they dispose of the sewer waste. Noted
that Parkway Plaza pumps its sewage to the south.
No one else was present to speak for or against the rezone. Chairman Mettler
closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 P.M.
Mr. Link asked how much of the property would be affected if development was
restricted to below the 35 foot elevation.
Mr. Crutchfield explained very little of the property would be affected and the
restriction is designed to maintain the integrity of the toe of the steep slope
above the subject property. Mr. Stoknes further noted the flexibility of exceed-
ing the 35 foot elevation if a.sound engineering proposal was presented.
Mr. Bowen asked about the need for sidewalks in this area especially with
additional commercial development.
Chairman Mettler explained the proposed Sidewalk Plan, as yet unadopted, indicated
a priority need for a siewalk in this vicinity but on the east side of Southcenter
Parkway.
Mr. Kirsop asked if the equitable charge in lieu of assessment, recommended by
Staff, would go to the City or to LID #27?
Mr. Stoknes pointed out the charge would go to LID #27 but the final assessment
roll has not been completed for that LID as yet.
Mr. Kirsop suggested adding the phrase "regraded during freeway construction"
after "area" in Finding #11.
Mr. Harvey Anderson of TEAM Research Company, applicant, arrived and Chairman
Mettler stated he could comment on the Staff Report.
Mr. Anderson stated his concurrence with the Staff Report and noted the sewer
force main and pump will be located at the northeast corner of the property to
both accomodate future developments to the north and to help defray costs.
Planiil�i'•� Commission `y
Minute' of the Meeting
Mr. UoOen questioned the setbacks of the C -2 zone.
Mr. Cr nt:chfield explained the only setback was the front; yard and the width tir
Mr. K 1 ►'sop
the st.►'cet effectively reduces the setback requirement to nothing,
noted the 15 foot utility easement creates are effective 15 l'cru t.
setbac i�• , Also indicated CM zone setbacks may be appropriate here to c:cmiir'I liii
the CO di stri ct across the street.
Mr. L dk asked what the proposed use is and is there enough parking?
Mr. Aiirlerson explained a wholesale tire distributorship i s planned here, �rrr�l
parkiilU will comply with code requirements.
Mr. Si ►tines asked Mr. Anderson if he was aware of the outside storage restrictions? Mr. A, Ic'rson stated he was.
Mr. Llltkasked if street was adequate here? Mr. Crutchfield stated Soutl�c
i
Parkway s a 5 lane arterial including a two -way left turn lane.
Motion by Mr. Kirsop to adopt the Findings and Conclusions of the Staff Report:
revi spd i and reca: end to the City Council that the rez one from R -1 to - .
C 2 i�
granted only upon compliance with the following stipulations:
Polio 3
26 Februnr.y 19
That land area above approximately 35 feet el e7: ti on be left in ;r
natural state.
the
The forced main sewer connection line be insta33sd in accordance with
City or? kwila standards, at the full expense pf the property owner,
and a special connection charge be paid by the p- operty owner in
accor ce with Chapter 14.16 (sewer charges) ;' the Tukwila Murr I e i i
Code.
as
1, Opera : �a and maintenance of the pump and sew force main shall 0
at a - 1 1 -11 expense of the owner.
4 A t , me as an LID is formed for a gravity = o',i sewer system serving
t e ��: -:; Ly of this property, as shown in the .c,iila Cornprehr:rr�;ivo
�Gsar - the property will agree to equitat articipate in such 1 ID
in a �.:��r nce with Section 14.16.076 of the T'..' - ; a Municipal Code.
A lieu of assessment to be paid to t:r ;ity at a ra)tr
es .a -ed by the final assessment role for L:: L7, L0 i'c'
:nnstruction shall conform to the hei:i yard and ;are;;,
and architectural review as outl: ir, Section: 18.32
of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
A above conditions shall be a part o, :;e ordinancr� fir';arrtirr,t
tf i= — = in the form of a Developer's Agreet:� t properl e2e t,ir,i 'and
Planning Commission Page 4
Minutes of the Meeting 26 February 1976
Discussion of the motion included the reasoning for Condition #6 - the C -2
zone setbacks do not compliment the CM zone directly across the street and
some control is needed to ensure that actual development of the C -2 zoned
property will not detract from the CM district.
Motion was seconded by Mr. West and carried unanimously.
VI B - CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - PARK and OPEN SPACE PROGRAM
Chairman Mettler explained that this Public Hearing had been commenced at the
29 January meeting and was recessed to this meeting. Opened the recessed hearing
at 9:10 P.M.
Carl Stixrood, Planning Department, explained that the Interagency Committee for
Outdoor Recreation (IAC) had reviewed the preliminary Program since the last
meeting and recommended several changes - primarily in the structure of the docu-
ment. Explained all the subsequent changes made to the original draft of 8
January 1976.
Mr. Kirsop asked how close the estimates contained in the Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) are to actual costs.
Mr. Stixrood explained that King County assessments were used and are character-
istically lower than appraised values. Development estimates are conservative in
that they represent costs of minimal projects.
Briefly described each project within the CIP.
Mr. Stoknes pointed out that IAC had recently revised their application require-
ments in that Tukwila must file a Park Plan by 1 April 1976 to qualify for any
finds during the next year. If this deadline is not met, the CIP would be set
back one year.
Mr. Bohrer asked how this proposed Program relates to the Open Space Element of
the Comprehnsive Plan recommended by the Commission for adoption.
Mr. Stoknes explained that the Park and Open Space Concepts defined through the
objectives and policies of the Element are implemented by the projects contained
in the proposed CIP.
Mr. George Hull, Segale Business Park, noted that Southcenter Parkway south of
180th Street is very dangerous for foot and bicycle traffic due to the width of
the road and the number of large trucks using it. The trail along the creek near
South 180th indicated in the proposed Program is very near the Segale residence.
Also stated that every time the City proposes to implement a plan with projects
it costs the taxpayers more money. Estimates are characteristically low and time
delays between estimates and actual construction raise the actual costs. Stated
it is better to dofew good park projects rather than several minimal projects.
Mr. Stoknes pointed out that the Capital Improvement Program anticipates funding
from current revenues and that no new taxes or bond issues would be needed to
implement the CIP.
Planning Commission Page 5
Minutes of the Meeting 26 February 1976
There being no further audience comments, Chairman Mettler closed the Public
Hearing at 10:05 P.M. No further discussion ensued.
Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried unanimously to recommend
the City Council adopt the preliminary Park and Open Space Program as drafted
8 January and amended 23 February 1976.
VI C - PUBLIC HEARING - RESIDENCE ELEMENT
Chairman Mettler opened the Public Hearing at 10:15 P.M. and Mr. Crutchfield
and Chairman Mettler read aloud the entire Element as proposed by the citizen
committee.
No one in audience spoke for or against the proposed Element.
Mr. Bohrer suggested replacing the word "location" with "proximity" in the
second paragraph on page 3 -2.
Mr. Stoknes suggested changing Policy 4 on page 3 -7 to read: Encourage a minimal
care and maintenance level for undeveloped open spaces.
Mr. Stoknes also suggested. adding "within appropriate zoning categories" to the
end of Policy 1 on page 3-11.
There being no further audience or Commission comments, Chairman Mettler closed
the Public Hearing at 10:50 P.M.
Motion by Mr. West, seconded by Mr. Link and carried unanimously to recommend
the City Council adopt the Residence Element as revised, as an element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
VIII A - Site Plan - Addition to Kirschner Scientific
Mr. Crutchfield pointed out the location of the existing building, described
the proposed improvements and read Staff Report recommending approval.
Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried unanimously to approve the
plans as presented.
Mr. Kirsop suggested the Building Department be directed to check the distance
between the proposed addition and any surrounding buildings to ensure the
maintenance of any open areas required by the Building Code.
IX A - Letter from Board of Adjustment re: Sign Code
Mr. Crutchfield read Staff Report and noted the letter had inadvertently been
omitted from the Staff Report. Proceeded to explain that an interpretation made
by Staff, and which had been sustained by the Board of Adjustment, restricted
wall signs to those building faces whose associated yard abutted a public right -
of -way. This action is being appealed to King County Superior Court by International -
Harvester and should be decided sometime in May or June.
Planning Commission Page 6
26 February 1976
Minutes of the Meeting
Commission noted their concurrence with the interpretation and directed Staff
to look into possible amendments to allow signing of buildings whose property
does not abut any public right -of -way.
Mr. West and Chairman Mettler noted that "A" frame signs are still a very real
problem and the Sign Code should be enforced to eliminate them.
Chairman Mettler noted the ACC covenants may be legally challenged in the near
future and that the City should consider the possibility of incorporating those
covenants into the zoning code to ensure the maintenance of Andover Industrial
Park.
Motion by Mr. Link, seconded by Mr. Bowen and carried to adjourn the meeting.
Chairman Mettler adjourned the regular February meeting at 11:15 P.M.
Minutes ' epared by:
ary Crutch:ield.
Assistant ' anner
Hans B. West, Secretary
Tukwila Planning Commission
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
26 February 1976 8:00 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM VI A : PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE (Anderson)
REQUEST: 'REZONE from R -1 to C -2
APPLICANT: Harvey Anderson (TEAM Research)
LOCATION: West side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial
FINDINGS
1. The subject property is approximately one -half acre in size and is
located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
2. The property is currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single - family residential
3. The property located immediately north of the subject property is
currently zoned C -2 (commercial).
4. The property located immediately south of the subject property .is
currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single- family residential).
5. The property located across Southcenter Parkway is currently zoned
CM( industrial park).
6. The west property line is also the east right -of -way line of Interstate
5.
r
7. An electrical substation, approved under a Special Use Permit for Public
Facilities in 1973, is located in the R -1 zone adjacent to the subject
property.
8. The nearest single- family residence is located approximately 300 feet
south of the subject property.
Planning Commission Page 2
Staff Report 26 February 1976
9. The subject property gently slopes from elevation 35 near the west
property line to elevation 25 at the east property line, a distance
of approximately 150 feet or a slope of about 6.5 percent.
10. A'variety of soil types can generally be found on the site, normally
indicative of poor arability, fair internal drainage, severe erosion
hazard and low bearing capacity. However, the insignificant slope of
the subject property tends to increase the development opportunity to
a level above the more general application to steep slopes. (SEE,
Tukwila Data Inventory, Map 1 -6)
11. The subject property is located on the fringes of a major wooded area
and is generally covered with a dense growth of 5 - 10 year old deci-
duous saplings.
12. Southcenter Parkway is a 72 foot developed right -of -way to which the
subject property has direct access.
13. A 10 -inch waterline is located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway.
14. A 12 -inch sanitary sewer line is located at the intersection of South-
center Parkway and Strander Boulevard, a distance of approximately 'iod0
feet north of the subject property.
15.. .A 24 -inch crossover is available near the northeast corner of the
subject property to facilitate storm water runoff..
16. The sanitary sewer line on Strander Boulevard was created by LID #5
and the subject property did not participate in that LID.
17. A recent supplement to the storm water system south of Interstate 405
between the river and Interstate 5 was financed by all commercial and
industrial zoned properties within that area.. The subject property
was excluded from the LID #27. due to.its residential zoning. (SEE,
Exhibit "B ")
18. The current Comprehensive Land Use Plan map indicates the subject
property as ultimate industrial use.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The requested rezone conforms to the.current Comprehensive Land Usre
Plan Map.
2. The subject property is contiguous to the existing C -2 zone on the
north and is contiguous on the south to a residentially zoned parcel
of land being used as a public utility substation.
C
Planning Commission Page 3
Staff Report 26 February 1976
3. The subject property is generally capable of physically supporting a
commercial development.
4. The dense growth of young deciduous trees retards storm water runoff
from the steep slope located above the subject property.
5. Access to the site is adequate to accomodate commercial development.
6. The existing water supply is adequate to accomodate commercial devel-
opment.
7. The existing sanitary sewer line is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but will require construction of nearly 1000 feet of forced
main sewer line to connect to it as well as payment . of an equitable .
latecomers charge to LID #5.
8. The existing storm sewer system is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but, insofar as this property was excluded from assessments
under LID #27 because of its residential zone, any .rezone to other than
residential use should include payment of an equitable latecomers charge
to LTD #27.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Findings and Conclusions discussed above, staff recommends the
Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the rezone from R -1 to C -2
be granted only upon compliance with the following stipulations:
1. That land area above approximately 35 feet elevation be left in a
natural state.
2. The forced main sewer connection line be installed in accordance with
City of Tukwila standards, at the full expense of the property owner,
and a special connection charge be paid by the property owner in
accordance with Chapter 14.16 (sewer charges) of the Tukwila Municipal
Code.
3. Operation and maintenance of the pump and sewage force main shall be
at the full expense of the owner.
4. At such time as an LID is formed for a gravity flow sewer system serving
the vicinity of this property, as shown in the Tukwila Comprehensive:
Sewer Plan, the property will agree to equitably participate in such LID
in accordance with Section 14.16.076 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
5. A charge in lieu of assessment to be paid to the City at a rate to be
established by the final assessment role for LID #27.
6. All of the above conditions shall be a part of the ordinance granting
the rezone in the form of a Developer's Agreement properly executed and
recorded.
•••••• .w r . .
Q
•
-. l: ia(: My1: tikl + 4 7: 1 t di "J,•.vL•riY '.•lifiJw�lydsl ¢�� ;i. �'• `\•�'' •�.,� ^`
`^.• , • te r' 4 -
•
•
m
m
•
•`b
+�9
)
• . t • 100.00
.... -Q
it }z
1.1
x
CO - '----..
SO
w
•
thwittaxiera.
:• •
M
,_• •< .a.''f1vftL ._�� u!.tt'.L'{'Y CW.u44.Y:'lYt'� .HXAL ' i_
,,,,`' -• �h � ��`, ' lam•
%. 7 `1..,,� '
...;C) �:7a �� '•. _ ~_ --- ' -- ------___--/Y 19 .ti3 SYlaSt4'Cyy /
••• "X"14.4"/MPACIalrfAkiaMala
m
N
0
m
D +
Z O
d �
rn
.
(a
Otf
coda
c• $v
c
Y , ..
- - - - -... Li --r t L. I -ry et'itt+ ^�
,1AiJDL:t4;. ; 7Y P) ' ....--.136,, _........_'-'.`C 4.1 L`
•••••i..••
•
9,¢
•
_ _ 00. 00 _
_... • MOO' 38' 44" w.
V ovii lG1 4
r. •
5/
� —_. may v¢ .... .- /4.
..--- 1 \� ■ .. X1'1 .. •!s" +w
0 ` z.1 IN 50\.--
1 5 W N gyp. +<`
N.
0
2 ��
4,1
TO: Tukwila Planning Commission
FROM: Mayor Ed Bauch
SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone
MEMORANDUM
CITY' of TUKWILA
cc: Anderson Rezone Application Master File
1
DATE: Feb. 18, 197
This memorandum is just a reminder that this property was excluded from the
storm drainage L.I.D. #27 since it was zoned for single- family purposes..
This land does effect storm drainage within the area of L.I.D. #27 and I .
strongly urge the Commission that if they recommend approval of the rezone
application, that as a condition of approval they recommend that the property
be charged an equitable amount to. L.I.D. #27.
Ex gall" "
- ee3aptc 4n4ewsot
aKKw 6o ilium � - 2Cs Pito 74
C
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT
15 March 1976 7:30 P.M.
AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE (Anderson)
REQUEST: REZONE from R -1 to C -2
APPLICANT: Harvey Anderson (TEAM Research)
LOCATION: West side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Industrial
FINDINGS
1. The subject property is approximately one -half acre in size and is
located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
2. The property is currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single - family residential).
3. The property located immediately north of the subject property is
currently zoned C -2 (commercial).
4. The property located immediately south of the subject property is
currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single - family residential).
5. The property located across Southcenter Parkway is currently zoned
CM (industrial park).
6. The west property line is also the east right -of -way line of Interstate
5.
7. An electrical substation, approved under a Special Use Permit for Public
Facilities in 1973, is located in the R -1 zone adjacent to the subject
property.
8. The nearest single - family residence is located approximately 300 feet
south of the subject property.
City Council
Staff Report
Page 2
15 March 1976
9. The subject property gently slopes from elevation 35 near the west
property line to elevation 25 at the east property line, a distance
of approximately 150 feet or a slope of about 6.5 percent.
10. A variety of soil types can generally be found on the site, normally
indicative of poor arability, fair internal drainage, severe erosion
hazard and low bearing capacity. However, the insignificant slope of
the subject property tends to increase the development opportunity to
a level above the more general application to steep slopes. (SEE,
Tukwila Data Inventory, Map 1 -6)
11. The subject property is located on the fringes of a major wooded area,
regraded during freeway construction, and is generally covered with a
dense growth of 5 - 10 year old deciduous saplings.
12. Southcenter Parkway is a 72 foot developed right -of -way to which the
subject property has direct access.
13. A 10 -inch water line is located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway.
14. A 12 -inch sanitary sewer line is located at the intersection of South -
center Parkway and Strander Boulevard, a distance of approximately 1000
feet north of the subject property.
15. A 24 -inch crossover is available near the northeast corner of the
subject property to facilitate storm water runoff.
16. The sanitary sewer line on Strander Boulevard was created by LID #5
and the subject property did not participate in that LID..
17. A recent supplement to the storm water system south of Interstate 405
between the river and Interstate 5 was financed by all commercial and
industrial zoned properties within that area. The subject property
was excluded from the LID #27 due to its residential zoning. (SEE,
Exhibit "B ")
18. The current Comprehensive Land Use Plan map indicates the subject
property as ultimate industrial use.
19. The Planning Commission, after conducting a Public Hearing on 26
February 1976, recommended the City Council grant the rezone contingent
upon compliance with seven stipulations. (SEE, Exhibit "C ")
CONCLUSIONS
1. The subject property is contiguous to the existing C -2 zone on the
north and is contiguous on the south to a residentially zoned parcel
of land being used as a public utility substation.
City Council Page 3
Staff Report 15 March 1976
2. The subject property is generally capable of physically supporting a
commercial development.
3. The dense growth of young deciduous trees retards storm water runoff
from the steep slope located above the subject property.
4. Access to the site is adequate to accomodate commercial development.
5. The existing water supply is adequate to accomodate commercial devel-
opment.
6. The requested rezone conforms to the current Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Map.
7. The existing sanitary sewer line is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but will require construction of nearly 1000 feet of forced
main sewer line to connect to it as well as payment of an equitable
latecomers charge to LID #5.
8. The existing storm sewer system is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but, insofar as this property was excluded from assessments
under LID #27 because of its residential zone, any rezone to other than
residential use should include payment of an equitable latecomers charge
to LID #27.
9. The Planning Commission deems the rezone to be appropriate only if carried
out in accordance with the recommended stipulations.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the foregoing Findings and Conclusions adopted by the Planning Commission,
staff recommends the City Council grant the rezone from R -1 to C -2 only upon
compliance with the following stipulations:
1. That land area above approximately 35 feet elevation be left in a natural
state.
2. The forced main sewer connection line be installed in accordance with
City of Tukwila standards, at the full expense of the property owner,
and a special connection charge by paid by the property owner in accor-
dance with Chapter 14.16 (sewer charges) of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
3. Operation and maintenance of the pump and sewage force main shall be at
the full expense of the owner.
4. At such time as an LID is formed for a gravity flow sewer system serving
the vicinity of this property, as shown in the Tukwila Comprehensive
Sewer Plan, the property will agree to equitably participate in such LID
in accordance with Section 14.16.076 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
r_,
City Council
Staff Report
(
Page 4
15 March 1976
5. A charge in lieu of assessment to be paid to the City at a rate to be
established by the final assessment role of LID #27.
6. On -site construction shall conform to the height, yard and area
restrictions and architectual review as outlined in Sections 18.32.030
and 18.32.040 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
7. All of the above conditions shall be a part of the ordinance granting
the rezone in the form of a Developer's Agreement properly executed and
recorded.
26 February 1976
REQUEST:
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
5.
AGENDA ITEM VI A :
CITY OF TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE (Anderson)
8:00 P.M.
• REZONE from R -1 to C -2
Harvey Anderson (TEAM Research)
West side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard.
Industrial
FINDINGS
1. The subject property is approximately one -half acre in size and is
located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway approximately 1000
feet south of Strander Boulevard. (SEE, Exhibit "A ")
2. The property is currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single- family residential).
3. The property located immediately north of the subject property is
currently zoned C -2 (commercial).
4. The property located immediately south of the subject property is
currently zoned R -1 -7.2 (single - family residential).
5. The property located across Southcenter Parkway is currently zoned •
CM( industrial park).
6. The west property line is also the east right -of -way line of Interstate
7. An electrical substation, approved under a Special Use Permit for Public
Facilities in 1973, is located in the R-1 zone adjacent to the subject
property.
8. The nearest single- family residence is located approximately 300 feet
south of the subject property.
Planning Commission C
Page 2
Staff Report 26 February 1976
9. The subject property gently slopes from elevation 35 near the west
property line to elevation 25 at the east property line, a distance
of approximately 150 feet or a slope of about 6.5 percent.
10. A variety of soil types can generally be found on the site, normally
indicative of poor arability, fair internal drainage, severe erosion
hazard and low bearing capacity. However, the insignificant slope of
the subject property tends to increase the development opportunity to
a level above the more general application to steep slopes. (SEE,
Tukwila Data Inventory, Map 1 -6)
11. The subject property is located on the fringes of a major wooded area
and is generally covered with a dense growth of 5 - 10 year old deci-
duous saplings.
12. Southcenter Parkway is a 72 foot developed right -of -way to which the
subject property has direct access.
13. A 10 -inch waterline is located on the east side of Southcenter Parkway.
14. A 12 -inch sanitary sewer line is located at the intersection of South -
center Parkway and Strander Boulevard, a distance of approximately '10d0
feet north of the subject property.
15. A 24 -inch crossover is available near the northeast corner of the
subject property to facilitate storm water runoff.
16. The sanitary sewer line on Strander Boulevard was created by LID #5
and the subject property did not participate in that LID.
17. A recent supplement to the storm water system south of Interstate 405
between the river and Interstate 5 was financed by all commercial and
industrial zoned properties within that area The subject property
was excluded from the LID #27 due to its residential zoning. (SEE,
Exhibit "B ")
18. The current Comprehensive Land Use Plan map indicates the subject
property as ultimate industrial use.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The requested rezone conforms to the.current Comprehensive Land Use
Plan Map.
2. The subject property is contiguous to the existing C -2 zone on the
north and is contiguous on the south to a residentially zoned parcel
of land being used as a public utility substation.
(
Planning Commission Page 3
Staff Report 26 February 1976
3. The subject property is generally capable of physically supporting a
commercial development.
4. The . dense growth of young deciduous trees retards storm water runoff
from the steep slope located above the subject property.
5. Access to the site is adequate to accomodate commercial development.
6. The existing water supply is adequate to accomodate commercial devel-
opment.
7. The existing sanitary sewer line is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but will require construction of nearly 1000 feet of forced.
main sewer line to connect to it as well as payment of an equitable .
latecomers charge to LID #5.
8. The existing storm sewer system is adequate to accomodate commercial
development but, insofar as this property was excluded from assessments
under LID #27 because of its residential zone, any rezone to other than
residential use should include payment of an equitable latecomers charge
to LID #27.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Findings and Conclusions discussed above, staff recommends the
Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the rezone from R -1 to C -2
be granted only upon compliance with the following stipulations:
1. That land area above approximately 35 feet elevation be left in a
natural state.
2. The forced main sewer connection line be installed in accordance with
City of Tukwila standards, at the full expense of the property owner,
and a special connection charge be paid by the property owner in
accordance with Chapter 14.16 (sewer charges) of the Tukwila Municipal
Code.
3. Operation and maintenance of the pump and sewage force main shall be
at the full expense of the owner.
4. At such time as an LID is formed for a gravity flow sewer system serving
the vicinity of this property, as shown in the Tukwila Comprehensive
Sewer Plan, the property will agree to equitably participate in such LID
in accordance with Section 14.16.076 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
5. A charge in lieu of assessment to be paid to the City at a rate to be
established by the final assessment role for LID #27.
6. All of the above conditions shall be a part of the ordinance granting
the rezone in the form of a Developer's Agreement properly executed and
recorded.
I?; • .-
1. •
•••• •
•
g y
• -A.,E
rno ztv;
g
P ;'iY1
-...
z to F. ii 0
-, t.. ...;• % '-
V •
•
4•••••••••••••■•••••••••••••••
••••••••••■•.........,
•••••••................ .e
....... 0
....,.
....,..... ..1,
0 ----..,
N....
,...
• -... •It. ' 0 \ .• S f
•........ •-..
:""^••■•• --*".............--
., ....... 0
A./ VA133 C."\NA., ‘,121444114312.11 • ,
h "•-•■Aj
ertvge
• •
m .43G 0 00N
0 . .
00•061 • . ."
■•■■••••••••
- ^Encat-sW 5 M4P 9 9
• • •
....•••••••••11
(dm.)
)JI1ILg 1
i t • S.
0
CC
w
A
w
z
0
w
CC
•
- •
L■•%
4214".4119t0.441 1?!"
219 4411"
4 %
•
%In& !' •
1.3.41411;"A 'Op fg444PC"alVNftitiCreittft4744.,,
'":414*".31146‘43".110
s •••••,..
•
wityll tr. Xt rZylvil".-1/V.0:79 c
- *lc
au'l lt•Stv
•,, , 1„. 1 . 1•1".t°‘‘t.'
•
...0011.4efria%$WM/$1146444..Kiliti7,414C-•''' • * 11141,t4tit,
. .
• 7
••••••••••••
•
.•••••••••
-••••• • •
• •
emolo • •
•
'4'r41-rf-r5V-4-,,,A.r.-N;L"%*W.Lk4ftt:94:4;tirt.„." 4,snujonc littpattim4F"14..
' -4K44
. •
•
–t zl<
•
•N s.
•
'Atiotk
,Cr
rrl
NJ
o
m
I77
0)
—
-c.
.0.1■66.414
s 1 ).■ CA17. .
, 1ANDL:44z. (TYP) •
• • • • No , •
. •
_a_ ...,.. .,,,,._,.... --,'F,VC4
----"ytkviqrsur, sc•
• . .....
. ...... _
• l iti i iki e.
' 1....
.........................„..............,.....
tli zotmtwuza ..., ,, _
• (1 41 . 134
144%4440,,,n
{)
. 100-0
vtkeiliga
vT
twp---;:
10*
rt717. r"\,44,147) ef AeseN," ereln
••••■
. ' I
amenalIONI■■••••■••■•■■•
. • .. • . . .
04{7440 .44..."*01741414.7;4•7;
-.1.1.0441■114"
TO: Tukwila Planning Commission
FROM: Mayor Ed Bauch
SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone
MEMORANDUM
CITV of TUKWILA
DATE: Feb. 18, 1976
This memorandum is just a reminder that this property was excluded from the
storm drainage L.I.D. #27 since it was zoned for single- family purposes.
This land does effect storm drainage within the area of L.I.D. #27 and I .
strongly urge the Commission that if they recommend approval of the rezone
application, that as a condition of approval they recommend that the property
be charged an equitable amount to. L.I.D. #27.
cc: Anderson Rezone Application Master File
K �l
Es i4ttar .
. "ReatYte 4 KdevSoK
¥ ohtiti i Comoissioa
April 5, 1976
Page 4
TUKWILA\ CITY COUNCIL MEETING
PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS - Cont.
Letter from
Steve Hall re:
items in Public
Works Committee
C
Letter from Mayor
Bauch re: additional
office space
OLD BUSINESS
King County Animal
Control Ordinance
proposal
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
Proposed ordinance -
Reclassifying certain
property from R -1 to
C -2 (Anderson)
Public Works Director Steve Hall urged the Council to
consider as soon as possible the water study for the
residential area. He stated the funding is budgeted
in the amount of $1,500. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED
BY SAUL, THAT ADMINISTRATION PRESENT A RESOLUTION TO
THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH URS COMPANY FOR THE WATER STUDY.
CARRIED. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY TRAYNOR, TO REFEI
ALL OTHER ITEMS IN STEVE HALL'S LETTER TO THE APRIL
12, 1976 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. CARRIED.
MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY HILL, TO CONCUR WITH
THE RECOMMENDATIONS STATED IN MAYOR BAUCH'S LETTER.*
City Clerk Shirlee Kinney read a letter from Mayor
Bauch addressed to the City Council dated April 1,
1976 regarding acquisition of an additional trailer
on a lease basis for the Mayor and future Administra-
tive Assistant, with space for the Council and their
secretary and for the City Attorney and Judge. .
Mr. Frank Todd stated he lived across the street from
City Hall and he objected to the proposed trailer parr
Discussion continued regarding use the trailer and
its conformity with the existing code provisions.
*CARRIED.
Deputy City Attorney Hard noted at the present time
we are not in contract compliance with King County
because we do not have an adopted ordinance similar
to that of King County's and at the present time, no
one is sure of what the animal control law is within
the City. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT
THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. CARRIEI
Deputy City Attorney Hard read by introduction only,
as the proposed ordinance has no.title. MOVED BY
SAUL, SECONDED BY TRAYNOR, TO RECONSIDER THE LAST
ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. CARRIED. MOVED BY
TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY VAN DUSEN, TO DIRECT THE CITY
ATTORNEY TO DRAFT AN ORDINANCE FOR ANIMAL CONTROL IN
COMPLETE FORM. CARRIED. Discussion continued with
the following audience comments. Mrs. Rena Holloway
stated there should be a leash law because after 10:0(
P.M., there is no control and the animals run in pack!
in the streets at night. Mrs. Anna Bernhard stated
she would like to see animal owners keep them in their
own yards 24 hours a day. Mr. Elfstrom stated he fell
there was no need to license your dog if you keep it
confined to your own yard. Mr. Fred Shepard stated hE
keeps his dog in his yard but when the dog got out on(
time, he was able to get it back again because it was
licensed. Mr. Gene Elfstrom stated when he called
King County Animal Control to report a stray dog, the:
asked him to tie the dog up and they would be out to
pick it up later. Mrs. Joan Todd stated they have
fenced their yard not to keep their dog in but to keel
all the other dogs out. Mr. Al Pieper stated he wit-
nessed two large dogs stop a couple of children on
the sidewalk as they were walking home from school.
I.f the dogs are out on the streets and sidewalks, whip
is the public's domain, they dogs should also be con-
sidered public property and dealt with as such.
MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY MS. PESICKA, THAT TI -IIS
ITEM BE DROPPED FROM THE AGENDA UNTIL ALL PAPERWORK
IS COMPLETED.* Mr. Larry Canaan, real estate agent
representing Mr. Anderson, requested the City Council
VILA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
April 5, 1976
Page 3
RESOLUTIONS - Cont.
Resolution 524 -
In appreciation to
Frank Todd
for services as
Mayor
Writ of Prohibition -
LID II28 - Esping vs
City of Tukwila
Writ of Prohibition -
Tukwila Associates
vs City of Tukwila
Letter from Mr.
Doces re: sign
code revision
Letter from
Mayor Bauch re:
grant procedures
•
MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED
RESOLUTION BE READ. CARRIED. Mayor Bauch read propos-
ed resolution in appreciation to Frank Todd for his
services to the City of Tukwila as Mayor. MOVED BY
MS. PESICKA, SECONDED BY HILL, TO SUSPEND THE RULES FOR
SECOND READING AND ADOPT RESOLUTION 524 AS READ.
CARRIED. Council President Hill presented a plaque
in appreciation to Mr. Todd.
} PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS, APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS
Protest LID II28 - Mayor Bauch noted this item appears on the Agenda for
Esping, Wynn, a natter of record only.
Tukwila Associates,
La Vista Estates &
Caditz
Mayor Bauch noted this item appears on the Agenda
for a matter or record only, and the City Attorney
will proceed with it.
Mayor Bauch noted this item appears on the Agenda for
a matter of record only, and the City Attorney will
proceed with it.
MOVED BY MS. PESICKA, SECONDED BY HILL, TO REFER
THESE ITEMS TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING,
APRIL 12, 1976.* Council President Hill stated no
Council action is required. *SECOND AND MOTION
WITHDRAIVN. Deputy City Attorney Hard explained
the position of Mr. Esping and of the Tukwila
Associates . and stated the two lawsuits may be combined
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THIS ITEM BE
REFERRED TO THE APRIL 12, 1976 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING. CARRIED.
•
Formal Motion 76 -3, MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT FORMAL MOTION
` Declaring intent to 76 -3 BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. CARRIED. City Clerk
adopt Residence Shirlee Kinney read Formal Motion 76 -3, a motion of the
Element as part of Tukwila City Council related to comprehensive planning,
the Comprehensive Plan declaring its intent to adopt at same future time the
Residence Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan
for the City, by title only. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECOND-
ED BY SAUL, TO ADOPT FORMAL MOTION 76 -3 AS READ.
CARRIED.
Council President Hill stated he felt the Council
should refer this letter to the Planning Commission
to review the sign code. Kjell Stoknes, Planning
Director, requested the Council to accept the letter
as information and to ask for a text amendment to
the code. Discussion continued regarding the Board
of Adjustment's decision to allow 90 days for sub-
mittal of text amendment proposals. MOVED BY MS.
HARRIS, SECONDED BY MS. PESICKA, TO REVERT TO A
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER. FAILED.
Discussion continued regarding location of curbs and
of the signs in violation. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED
BY SAUL, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL REFER THIS MATTER TO
THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO REVIEW WITH A 60 -DAY TIME
PERIOD TO RESPOND.* Deputy. City Attorney Hard stated
the Council must keep this moving or the abatement of
the signs will proceed. Mr. G. John Doces addressed
the Council with the background in the placement of
his signs and the problems created before they had
been installed to direct customers into the proper
entrance. Public Works Director Steve. Hall illustrate
the street and parking lot area on the blackboard.
*CARRIED, WITH MS. HARRIS VOTING NO.
nw.ILA CITY COUNCIL MLICNG
;Aril 5, 1976
Page 5
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES - Cont.
/Proposed ordinance - to consider first reading tonight in order to keep
Anderson rezone - the matter on schedule. He stated it is not Mr.
Cont. Anderson's responsibility that the developers agree-
ment is not completed to accompany the ordinance.
Deputy City Attorney Hard stated his office would have
the developers agreement completed soon and there
would be no harm in reading the proposed ordinance by
title on its first . reading tonight. *MOVED BY TRAYNOR,
SECONDED BY PESICKA, TO RECONSIDER TI-II PREVIOUS ACTION
CARRIED. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO
READ PROPOSED ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY ON ITS FIRST
READING. CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read
proposed ordinance reclassifying a certain property
located on the West side of Southcenter Parkway approx
imately 1,000 feet South of Strander Boulevard from a
R -1 -7.2 zoning classification to a C -2 zoning classifi
cation within the City of Tukwila, by_title only.
Proposed ordinance -
Amending T.M.C.
18.34.170 re: height
& number of stories
in CPR zone
Ordinance 965 -
Accepting donation
. for Bicentennial
Committee cookbook
from Bell Office
Products
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 525 -
Authorizing'Mayor
to execute agree-
ment with LeSourd,
Patten, Fleming &
Hartung for legal
services
Resolution 526 -
Authorizing Mayor
to execute agree-
ment with RAYS
for certain social
services
Proposed resolution
Segregating special
assessment in LID
1124, Lindell F
Associates
/d8
MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED
ORDINANCE BE READ ON ITS FIRST READING. CARRIED.'
Deputy City Attorney Hard read proposed ordinance
amending Section 18.34.170 of the Tukwila Municipal
Code Title 18, zoning code, and Ordinance 251 as it
relates to height and number of stories in a CPR zone
district. City Council discussed the parking require-
ments in conjunction with the height limitation change
proposed by the Doubletree Inn. MOVED BY MS. HARRIS,
SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE REFERRED
TO THE APRIL 12, 1976 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY MS. PESICKA, SECONDED BY MS. HARRIS, THAT
PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ. CARRIED. Deputy City
Attorney Hard read proposed ordinance of the City of
Tukwila accepting a donation for the Bicentennial
Committee cookbook. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY
SAUL, TO SUSPEND THE RULES FOR SEC &ND READING AND
ADOPT ORDINANCE 965 AS READ. CARRIED.
MOVED BY VAN DUSEN, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED
RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY ON SECOND READING.
CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read proposed
resolution authorizing Mayor to negotiate and execute
an agreement with LeSourd, Patten, Fleming & Hartung
for compensation for legal services rendered, by title
only. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT RESO-
LUTION 525 BE ADOPTED AS READ.* Mr. Frank Todd stated
it was not clear whether the contract was with the •
firm or with the designated City Attorney. *CARRIED.
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED RESOLU-
TION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY ON SECOND READING. CARRIED.
Deputy City Attorney Hard read proposed resolution •
authorizing the Mayor to execute an .agreement with the
Renton Area Youth Services to provide certain social
services, by title only. MOVED BY MS. PESICKA, SECOND
ED BY HILL, THAT RESOLUTION 526 BE ADOPTED AS READ.
CARRIED.
MOVED BY MS. HARRIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED
RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY FOR FIRST READING.
CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read proposed
resolution segregating special assessment on property
in LID No. 24, owned by Warren Neuroth, a portion of
which was transferred to F. R. Lindell and Associates.,
by title only. Public Works Director Steve Hall
explained the segregation of the LID.
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL TETING
April 5, 1976
Page 6
RESOLUTIONS - Cont.
Proposed resolution
Authorizing Mayor
to acquire Macabee
property for park
purposes
Proposed resolution
Amending Resolution
505 to change date,
time and place of
Finance F, Personnel
Committee meetings
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Mayor's Report
MISCELLANEOUS AND
Undergrounding
project status
Desimone property
appraisal
Department Heads
salary negotiations
South King County
Park Facility name
Street problems
FURTHER AUDIENCE COMMENTS
MOVED BY MS. PESICKA, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROP
RESOLUTION BE READ IN FULL FOR FIRST READING. CARtaj
Deputy City Attorney Hard read proposed resolutio
authorizing the Mayor to negotiate for, and acquire,
certain real property for park purposes.
MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT PROPOSED
RESOLUTION BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND INCLUDING THE
CHANGE. CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney read proposed
resolution amending Resolution 505 to change time,
date and place of the Finance and Personnel Committee
meetings and read the change as follows: Finance and
Personnel Committee, meetings on the last Tuesday each
month at 12:15 P.M. at the Foster Golf Course, 13500
Interurban Avenue South. Mayor Bauch recommended the
day be changed from Tuesday to Wednesday for the Public
Safety Committee. Councilman Gardner noted the time
for the Public Works Committee meetings should be
5:00 P.M. instead of 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Bauch stated the resolution of intent to annex
certain property North of the City which had been
intended for tonight's Agenda will be ready for the
next regular Council meeting.
Mayor Bauch stated there will be changes made to the
ladies' restroom at City Hall to allow access from the
vestibule during Council and Court sessions, and we
are currently looking for part- time.help in the
Building Department as budgeted for a craftsman.
Councilman Van Dusen asked about the progress on the
undergrounding program. Steve Hall, Public Works
Director, stated the contracts with: Puget Power and.
Pacific Northwest Bell .are now signed and we are
scheduled to begin about July 1, with the first area
planned at the Tukwila Elementary School.
Councilman Van Dusen asked about the progress of
negotiations to obtain an appraisor for the Desimone
property for City Hall. Mayor Bauch stated he had not
yet been contacted by Mr. Desimone, who has been out
of town recently.
Councilman Traynor stated the Council needs to start
the negotiations with Department Heads. MOVED BY
TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO SCHEDULE AN EXECUTIVE
SESSION AT A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING APRIL 8,
1976 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO DISCUSS
NEGOTIATIONS WITH DEPARTMENT HEADS.' CARRIED.
Mr. Rudy Regel stated the committee chosen to establisl
a new name for the park has looked favorably upon
Tukwila's suggestion of Fort Dent, but they would like
to include the fact that it is an athletic facility --
Fort Dent Athletic Facility. Other suggestions under
consideration are Tecumseh Park and Hazelnut Park.
Mr. Regel also informed the Council of a problem on
147th Street between 56th and 57th Avenues regarding
a hazard on the steps there and the overgrowth of vine
and brush on the 10 foot City - owned strip.
April 5, 1976
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3 -15 -76
1 VAIYLLt\ L.111 1.VUL' .1L '
AGENDA
• 11. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
a. Mayor's Report
12. MISCELLANEOUS AND FURTHER AUDIENCE COMMENTS
13. ADJOURNMENT
* - Previously distributed material
Ord_ #965
Reso. #521
4. APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS (Including former Vouchers #8020 F 8021 - Atty.
#8000 $ 8026 - Maxwel
5. BID OPENINGS, CALLS t AWARDS medic
a. Call for Bids: Asphaltic concrete overlay
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS ice'
• a. Preliminary plat proposal of Todd's Rainier Vi.st
b. Adoption of Commerce /Industry Element of the Coinprehensa.ve Plan
7. •PETITIONS, COMMUNICATIONS,. APPEALS AND SIMILAR MATTERS •`
a. Protest LID #28 - Esping, Wynn, Tukwila Associates,•La
Estates & Caditz
• b. Writ of Prohibition - LID #28 - Esping vs City of Tukwila
• c. Writ of Prohibition - LID #28 - Tukwila Associates vs City of
Tukwila
• d. Formal Motion 76-3 = Declaring intent to adopt Residence Element
as part of the Comprehensive Plan
e. Doces' letter re: sign code revision
• f. Mayor's letter re: grant procedures proposal..
g. Steve Hall's letter .items in Public Works Committee
h. Mayor's letter re: additional office space
8. OLD BUSINESS
• a. King.County Animal Control Ordinance
9. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES
a. Reclassifying certain property from R -1 to C -2 (Anderson)
b. Amending zoning ordinance, T.M.C. 18.34.170
c. Accepting a donation for the Bicentennial Cookbook
10. RESOLUTIONS •
✓ a. Authorizing Mayor to execute agreement with LeSourd, Patten,
Fleming & Hartung for legal services (2nd reading)
• b. Authorizing Mayor to execute agreement with RAYS for. certain
social services (2nd reading) •
c. Segregating special assessment in LID #24, Lindell & •Assoc. (1st)
d. Authorizing Mayor to acquire Macabee property for park purposes (1
e. Amending Reso. 505 to change time, date & place of Finance t
Personnel Committee meetings (1st reading)
f. In appreciation to Joanne Davis as Councilwoman (1st reading)
g. In appreciation to Joseph Johanson as Councilman (1st reading)
h. In appreciation to Jon Sterling as Councilman (1st reading)
i. In appreciation to Frank Todd as Mayor (1st reading)
C-
TO: City Council
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone Developers Agreement
This memorandum is just to inform you that the developers agreement is in the
process of being executed.
The agreement will be submitted to the City Council prior to the City Council
meeting separate from the regular Council packet,already executed,and in a
format acceptable to the City Attorney.
I hope this will allow the Council to take action regarding second reading
and adoption of the rezone ordinance.
KS /cw
MEMORANDUM
CITY of TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•
DATE: 15 April 1976
FOLLOWS:
UK
WASHINGTON •
ORDINANCE NO 7&
ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY APPROXIMATELY
1,000 FEET SOUTH OF STRANDER BOULEVARD FROM A R -1 -7.2
ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO A C -2 ZONING CLASSIFICATION
WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA.
IL
WHEREAS, the owners of the following described property have
petitioned the City requesting reclassification of said property from R -1 -7.2
to C -2 in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, and;
WHEREAS, adequate environmental information was submitted and a
negative declaration made by the responsible official, and;
WHEREAS, a public hearing on said petition was held before the
Planning Commission as required by law on February 26, 1976 after which
a favorable recommendation was made, and;
WHEREAS, the owners of said property have executed a developers
agreement in favor of the City of Tukwila implementing the recommendations
of the Tukwila Planning Commission as contained in the Staff Report dated
15 March 1976, the agreement having been properly recorded and a copy filed
with the City and which is made by reference a part of this ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA DO ORDAIN AS
Section 1.. That the real property located on the west side of South -
center Parkway approximately 1,000 feet south of Strander Boulevard, as further
described herein, is hereby classified C -2 in accordance with Ordinance #251 of
the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the map
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" as illustrative of the property described herein
as follows:
NIJ
North 100 feet south 400 feet SE 'r,NEr 4 Section 26,
Townshi /N, Range 4 EWN, King County, Washington,
lying east of Interstate Highway number 5 and west
of Southcenter Parkway and more commonly described
as lot 11, block 3, McMicken Heights division number
1, unrecorded, North 100 feet of east 350 feet less
state highway, less the east 6 feet for street.
Section 2. This rezone classification to C -2 is made based upon the
following conditions, as contained in the developers agreement:
A. That land area above approximately 35 feet elevation be left
in a natural state.
B. The forced main sewer connection line be installed in accordance
with City of Tukwila standards, at the full expense of the property
owner, and a special connection charge be paid by the property
owner in accordance with Chapter,14.60 (Sewer Charges) of the
Tukwila Municipal Code.
C. Operation and maintenance of the pump and sewage force main shall
be at the full expence of the owner.
D. At such time as a L.I.D. is formed for a gravity flow sewer system
serving the vicinity of this property, as shown in the Tukwila
Comprehensive Sewer Plan, the property will agree to equitably
participate in such L.I.D. in accordance with Section 14.60.076
of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
E. A charge in lieu of assessment to be paid to the City at a rate
to be established by the final assessment roll of L.I.D. #27.
F. On site construction shall conform to the height, yard and area
restrictions and architectural review as outlined in Sections
18.32.030 and 18.32.040 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
G. All of the above conditions shall be a part of the ordinance
granting the rezone in a form of a developers.agreement properly
executed, recorded, and filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, and
signed by the Mayor, at a regular meeting thereof this Ic day.of
, 1976.
Approved as to form:
Published:
City Attorney
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
r
•
.,.
•
:I, • .f •
j -;:;_.
l � �S3
•
TUKI':IL A CITY COUNC ' ( iiTING
March 1, 1976
Page 2
VOUCHER APPROVAL - Cont.
LID 1125 C -37, 38, 39
R -26
LID 1126 C -4
R -4
PUBLIC FIEARINGS
Request for
I rezone (R -1 to
C -2) for property
located in area of
Strander Blvd. &
Southcenter
Parkway
(Anderson)
OLD BUSINESS
Schedule meeting
to review A & E
architects'
proposals
i••IcAbee property
' appraisal
NEW BUSINESS
Bicentennial
Park projects
•
•
•
$1,482.72. : :
1,482.72
$734.00
734.00
Adoption of Mayor Bauch declared the public hearing open at 7:20 P.I�j
Residence Element l
of the Comprehensive
Plan Planning Director Kjell Stoknes reviewed the process ofl
meeting with the citizens committee and the Planning j
Commission.. Gary Crutchfield, Planning Department, l
stated that Mrs.. Bernhard and Mrs. Van Dusen, present iil,
the audience, were among the members of the citizens
committee which was chaired by a member of the Planning
Commission. Mayor Bauch called for comments from the
audience.
Councilman Van Dusen asked if the information covered it
the committee was going to be made available to the Cit,
Council and the public. Mayor Bauch stated the informal
tion gathered to use with the maps will be available whl
the maps portion of the update is presented. Kjell
Stoknes stated much of the information covered by the
committees is available in the Data Inventory and in
Planning Department files.
No comments for or against the subject were made.
Mayor Bauch declared the public hearing closed at 7:26 1
Mayor Bauch declared the public hearing open at 7:27 P.f,
Kjell Stoknes, Planning Director, reviewed the history .
of the rezone request and stated the Planning Commission
has concurred with the staff report 'and added condition'
number 6. The developers agreement should contain all
these conditions. Mayor Bauch called for audience com-
ments. Councilman Traynor requested that the property
location be pointed out on the map. Kjell Stoknes local
the site.
Mr. Chris Crumbaugh, Segale Business Park, requested thr
terms and conditions be read. Deputy Clerk Doris Phelps
read the information from the staff report.
No comments for or against the subject were made.
Mayor Bauch declared the public hearing closed at 7:32 1
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY MS. PESICKA, TO SCHEDULE
MARCH 29, 1976 AS A COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING TO
CONSIDER A & E PROPOSALS AT 7:00 P.M. CARRIED.
Mayor Bauch stated he requested this item on the Agenda.
Council President Hill pointed the area out on the map
and read the cover letter from Ballaine & Halliday, the
firm submitting the appraisal for all parcels in the
amount of $106,150. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY VAN DUS1
TO ADD THIS ITEM TO THE MARCH 29 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MEETING AGENDA. CARRIED.
Mayor Bauch read from the February, 1976 Bicentennial'
Proclamations newsletter, a copy of which is on file in
the Clerk's office. The requests for City participatioi
in the park projects were discussed (grass, fencing and
Narcit 15, 1976
7 :00 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE AND
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL OF
COUNCIL MEMBERS
OFFICIALS IN
ATTENDANCE
MINUTE APPROVAL
VOUCHER APPROVAL
TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
1 V 1 ..1 t
Tukwila City Hall
Council Chambers
M I N U T E S
Mayor Bauch led the Pledge of Allegiance and called the
Tukwila City Council meeting to order.
GARDNER, MS. HARRIS, HILL, MS. PESICKA, SAUL, TRAYNOR,
VAN DUSEN.
Deputy Clerk Doris Phelps, Planning Director Kjell
Stoknes, City Attorney Donald Fleming.
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY MS. PESICKA, TEIAT THE MARCH 1,
1976 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES BE APPROVED AS PUBLISHED.*
Mayor Bauch noted a clarification of the Minutes which
was read by the Deputy Clerk. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY
MS. PESICKA, TO AMEND THE MOTION THAT THE CLARIFICATION
BE ADDED TO THE MINUTES. ** Councilwoman Harris stated
the comments in question made by Councilwoman Pesicka
cannot•be changed so the clarification should be included
in tonight's meeting's Minutes. * *SECOND AND MOTION
WITHDRAWN. Councilman Van Dusen questioned a vote
as noted on Page 8 regarding Alternate #1. Mayor Bauch
stated this would indicate that the Motion had failed
unanimously since no "yes" votes were recorded and no
roll call was taken. *CARRIED. The March 1, 1976 Minutes
Page 11, paragraph 3, should be clarified to include that
Public Works Director Steve Hall had not made the state-
ment to Councilwoman Pesicka that he disagreed with the
zoning.
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE MARCH 1, 1976
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES BE APPROVED AS PUBLISHED. CARRIED
MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE BILLS BE
ACCEPTED AND WARRANTS BE DRAWN IN THEIR RESPECTIVE AMOUNT
Councilman Traynor questioned Vouchers #8026 and #8000
in payment for medical supplies to Officer Maxwell. He
stated these expenses should be covered by the LEFF Act.
Mayor Bauch stated any items not covered by the LEFF pay-
ments are to be paid by the City. Mayor Bauch further
explained the bills. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL,
TO DELETE VOUCHERS #8000 AND #8026 UNTIL POLICE CHIEF
JOHN SHEETS CAN CLARIFY THAT THESE ITEMS ARE COVERED BY
LEFF. CARRIED. Council President Hill questioned
Vouchers #8020 and #8021 payable for services of the
present City Attorney for 1975 and 1974. He stated he
would like the opportunity for the Council to be brought
up to date on the events during the next Committee of
the Whole meeting. He stated he did not feel it was fair
to ask the newly elected Council Members to vote on these
without having some explanation. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED
BY VAN DUSEN, TO WITHHOLD VOUCHERS #8020 AND #8021 TO
DISCUSS AT THE NEXT COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING. **
Councilwoman Harris stated since our City Attorney is
present right now, we can discuss it•tonight. Council
President Hill stated there are two public hearings on
the Agenda tonight along with our other business, and he
preferred to discuss this next week. Councilwoman Pesick
stated she had not reviewed those particular Vouchers.
Councilman Van Dusen stated he had several questions
about the bills and he felt it would take same time to
review those costs, amounting to about $12,000. Council-
man Traynor stated he was satisfied with the firm's serv-
ices, but he stated the new Council Members should be
appaised of the Council's actions of the past two years.
**CARRIED, WITH GARDNER AND MS. I- IARRIS VOTING NO.
*MOTION AS AMENDED, CARRIED.
Vouchers #7982 - #8113
Current Fund #7982 - #8079 $27,930.55
Street Fund #8080 - #8087 406.02•
Fed. Rev. Shg. •#8088 392.66
Water Fund 118089 - 08099 17,1S9.06
Sewer Fund n8100 - /18.112 :0,665.00
W/S Const. #8113 u 8.25
TO: City Council
FROM.: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone
MEMORANDUM
CITY of TUKWILA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: March 10, 1976
No developer's agreement has been executed to date as stated and required in the
attached proposed ordinance.
Staff recommends second reading and adoption of this ordinance not occur until
this has been accomplished.
FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING A CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY APPROXIMATELY
1,000 FEET SOUTH OF STRANDER BOULEVARD FROM A R -1 -7.2
ZONING CLASSIFICATION TO A C -2 ZONING CLASSIFICATION
WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA.
Nu t
North 100 feet, south 400 feet SE .NE 4 Section 26,
4N --
Township , Range 4 EWN, King County, Washington,
lying east of Interstate Highway number 5 and west
of Southcenter Parkway and more commonly described
as lot 11, block 3, McMicken Heights division number
1, unrecorded, North 100 feet of east 350 feet less
state highway, less the east 6 feet for street.
Preliminary
3/10/76
CITY OF TUKWILQ
WHEREAS, the owners of the following described property have
petitioned the City requesting reclassification of said property from R -1 -7.2
to C -2 in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, and;
WHEREAS, adequate environmental information was submitted and a
negative declaration made by the responsible official, and;
WHEREAS, a public hearing on said petition was held before the
Planning Commission as required by law on February 26, 1976 after which
a favorable recommendation was made, and;
WHEREAS, the owners of said property have executed a developers
agreement in favor of the City of Tukwila implementing the recommendations
of the Tukwila Planning Commission as contained in the Staff Report dated
15 March 1976, the agreement having been properly recorded and a copy filed
with the City and which is made by reference a part of this ordinance.
rl
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA DO ORDAIN AS
Section 1. That the real property located on the west side of South -
center Parkway approximately 1,000 feet south of Strander Boulevard, as further
described herein, is hereby classified C -2 in accordance with Ordinance #251 of
the City of Tukwila, as amended, and the City Council hereby adopts the map
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" as illustrative of the property described herein
as follows:
,'
Section 2. This rezone classification to C-2 is made based upon the
following conditions, as contained in the developers agreement:
A. That land area above approximately 35 feet elevation be left
in a natural state.
B. The forced main sewer connection line be installed in accordance
with City of Tukwila standards, at the full expense of the property
owner, and a special connection charge be paid by the property
owner in accordance with Chapter 14.60 (Sewer Charges) of the
Tukwila Municipal Code.
C. Operation and maintenance of the pump and sewage force main shall
be at the full expence of the owner.
D. At such time as a L.I.D. is formed for a gravity flow sewer system
serving the vicinity of this property, as shown in the Tukwila
Comprehensive Sewer Plan, the property will agree to equitably
participate in such L.I.D. in accordance with Section 14.60.076
of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
E. A charge in lieu of assessment to be paid to the City at a rate
to be established by the final assessment roll of L.I.D. #27..
F. On site construction shall conform to the height, yard and area
restrictions and architectural review as outlined in Sections
18.32.030 and 18.32.040 of the Tukwila Municipal Code.
G. All of the above conditions shall be a part of the ordinance
granting the rezone in a form of a developers agreement properly
executed, recorded, and filed in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, and
signed by the Mayor, at a regular meeting thereof this /7:- day of
(,. ^ , 7, , 1976.
Aperoved as to form:
City Attorney
Published: lytccrc
Attest:
•
Mayor
City C1 irk //
7604200501
CD The parties agree as follows:
PROPERTY USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• AGREEMENT
t :r-i7 b7 ex
CS OF TUKWI J .
c;rY can 0FF:C
APR 20 ilMS
THIS AGREEMENT is between the City of Tukwila, a.
CD
U municipal corporation (hereinafter "City ") and HARVEY ANDERSON
CD
CD
and LUELLA ANDERSON, husband and wife (hereinafter "Owners ").
1. The owners are now the purchasers under a real
estate contract of the following described property, hereinafter
called the "property ":
North 100 feet of the South 400 feet, Southeast
one - quarter northwest one - quarter, Section 26,
Township .- 23N,. 4, E.W.M., King County,
Washington, lying east of Interstate Highway
number 5 and west of Southcenter Parkway and more
commonly described as Lot 11, Block 3, McMicken
Heights Division No. 1, unrecorded, North 100 feet
of east 350 less state highway, less the east 6
feet for street. .All located in Tukwila, King
County, Washington.
2. Owner filed a petition on January 28, 1975 to
establish a reclassification of said property from a R -1 -7.2
zoning classification to a C -2 zoning classification.
3. The Planning Commission of the City of Tukwila,
after a detailed review of the location of the owners'
property, and being cognizant that the proposed zoning
changes were compatible with those shown on the City's
Comprehensive Land Use Plan map, did recommend to the City
Council, after the Planning Commission's public meeting on
February 26, 1976 that such zoning reclassification be
allowed, but only upon execution of a property use and
• development agreement substantially in the form hereof,
herein called "Agreement ".
4. The City Council, at a public hearing on March
15, 1976 reviewed the recommendations of the Planning Commission
and found that the establishment of the requested zoning
reclassification, if developed in accordance with certain
CD
conditions listed herein, would be within the public health,
Ln
CD safety and general welfare and approved of the zoning
CD
CV
reclassification.
CD
.O 5. Owners, in consideration thereof, and for so
N
long as the property remains so classified, hereby covenant,
bargain and agree to the following conditions on behalf of
themselves, their heirs, their successors and assigns:
A. All land area within the property
located at the elevation of 35 feet above sea
level, or more, shall be left in its natural
state.
B. A forced main sewer line shall
be installed in accordance with City of
Tukwila standards, at the sole expense of the
owners, and owners shall pay to the City the
special connection charge in accordance with
Chapter 14.16 of the Tukwila Municipal Code
and any and all other applicable City and
state laws, rules and regulations.
C. Operation and maintenance of
the pump and sewage force main sewer line
shall be at the sole expense of the owner and
shall be operated and maintained in accordance
with all applicable City, county, state and
federal standards.
D. At such time as a local improvement
district is formed for a gravity -flow sewer
system serving the vicinity of this property,
• O
_CD
(NI
O
N
3
8. In the event any covenant, condition or restriction
hereinabove contained, or any partition thereof is invalid
or void, such invalidity or voidness shall in no effect any
other covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained.
as shown in the City of Tukwila Comprehensive
Sewer Plan, or as later determined to be
necessary, the owners will equitably participate
in such LID in accordance with all applicable
City, county, state and federal laws, rules
and regulations.
E. Owners shall pay a charge in
lieu of assessment to the City at a rate to
be established by the final assessment role
of LID No. 27.
F. On -site construction on the
property shall conform to the height, yard
and area restrictions and architectural
review as outlined in Sections 18.32.030
18.32.040 of the Tukwila Municipal Code and
all other applicable laws, rules and regula-
tions at the time of such construction.
6. This Agreement shall be recorded in the records
of the Department of Records and Elections for King County,
Washington and the covenants herein shall be deemed to
attach to and run with the land and shall be binding upon
the owner his heirs, successors and assigns.
7. The City may institute and prosecute any-
proceedings at law or equity to enforce this Agreement and
owners agree to pay the reasonable attorney's fees and costs
expended by the City for such proceedings.
9. In the event owners, or their heirs, successors
in interest, assigns, or any other person claiming any
interest in the property by or through owners, becomes
O insolvent, bankrupt, makes an assignment for the benefit of
� C creditors or is a debtor in any formal or informal
y proceeding
CD
for the use and benefit of their creditors, or forfeits or
t- in any manner loses, or is threatened with the loss of, any
interest in the property, the City shall have, at its sole
option, the right to change the zoning classification of
this property from C -2 to R- 1 -7.2, or any other appropriate
classification.
10. Owners shall abide by all applicable laws,
rules and regulations which now or which will in the future
relate to their use of the property.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed the
day and year first above written at Tukwila, Washington.
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
. ss.
County of King )
By
CITY OF TUKWILA
. Bauch, Mayor
By /, %/ i f( ° 7 ( '
Shiriee Kinney, City Clerk
1.
CITY
- 4 -
Anderson
Luella Anderson
On this f6.& day of � •f.e.Z., , 1976, personally
appeared before me EDGAR D. BAUCH SHIRLEE KINNEY, to me
OWNERS
•
C-..4 ,. • s : • �
_ ter• _
I.a . ,
•
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
County of King • )
written.
r.
t r
C r 1 •C'�.
known to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the
CITY OF TUKWILA, the municipal corporation that executed the
within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instru-
CD ment to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
0 municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
C mentioned, and on oath stated that they were authorized to
execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
O corporate seal of said municipal corporation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
ana my official seal the day and year first above
wi
,746.6e/ 4
NOTARY VUBLIC in and.= fcfr the State of
Washington, residing at z.4`0e4✓
On this /fd day of �f j,�24 , 1976, personally
appeared before me HARVEY ANDERSON and LUELLA ANDERSON, to
me known to be the individuals described in and who executed
the within and foregoing instrument and.acknowledged the
said instrument to be their free and voluntary act' and deed
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
and affixed my official seal the day and year first above
w2 ie/ y.�i�G' , •
NOTARY /PUBLIC in andefor the State o
Washington, residing at �,Z
SUSS ^ ITUT /(27
RESOLUTION IOT INO. . ./, •
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Tdkwila acknowledging that the Comprehensive Plan
for the City of Tukwila no longer reflects currently
held values of the community in regard to planning
and land use development; recognizing the necessity
of establishing a. new land use policy plan or
comprehensive plan; and declaring a proposed interim
policy.
'THERM, ,, ', the comprehensive plan still in existence for the City of Tukwila
vas adopted prior to the enactment of the Nashingvon State Environnental Policy
Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance flo. 759 relating to environmental policy, and;
bIIWf1 it is clear that the comprehensive plan for the City of Tukwila no
longer entirely reflects currently held values of the community, its legislative
body or the currently recognized state of the art•of planning and community
development, and;
WHEREAS, it is necessary, as well as required, by the State Environmental Polic-
Act to review the land use plans and planning-processes of the City of Tukwila to
assure that the land use plan, its goals and policies are consistent with the mandate
of the Environmental Policy Act and the currently held values of the total community;
POW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tukwila City Council as follows:
A. Any rezone application, except a rezone from one single family
residential classification to another single family residential
classification.
13. Comprehensive Land'Use Plan amendments.
C. Those land use actions which, subsequent the preparation of
an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act are found by
the City Council to
1. n recedent setting.
2. Contain significant environmental impacts which will not
be mitigated.
Section 1: The City Council finds that the present comprehensive plan irhich
shall be accepted or processed by the City unt81 completion and adoption of a new
land use policy plan:
•
•
D. Proposals for grading,
1. Located in an area with average slopes in excess of 25
2. Located in a geographical area identified by governmental
or quasi - governmental agencies as having:
(a) Naturally unstable, unstable when modified, or
in areas of known landslides.
(b) Areas which serve to naturally detain significant
amounts of storm water run -off.
3. Served by inadequate grater, sewer, storm drainage or trans-
portation systems unless such action proposes the improve- -'
vent of any deficient system to minimum city standards and
at the expense of the private sponsor.
Section 5: Any proponent sponsor for an action identified in Section 4
above may appeal the provisions of this policy to the City Council and present evidence
or other materials or findings to request a waiver of the provisions of this policy.
Upon appeal, the city Planning Department shall recommend, and the City Council shall
decide whether to permit an application to be filed and processed with the appropriate
city department or departments. The City Council will at such time consider only the
question of whether or not there should be a waiver of the policy herein adopted.
Such action by the City Council shall in no way prejudge the substantive merits of the
proposed action. If it is determined necessary or advisable, the City Council may
conduct a public hearing prior to reaching a decision on any waiver request as to the
provisions of this resolution. Notice for a public hearing shall be given at the
applicant's expense in a manner prescribed by Chapter 18.92 of the Tukwila Municipal
Code, Ordinance 251, as amended.
/Section 6: The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of the resolution with
every department and advisory or administrative board for the City of Tukwila.
Section 7: This resolution and the policy herein adopted shall be brought
before the City Council for its review and reconsideration at the first regular counci
meetinz in July, 1976.
Section 8: This resolution becomes effective thirty (30) days after passage
Any application for a building permit on file with the City 30 days subsequent to
passage of this resolution is exempt from the provisions of this policy.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, UASHII'TGTON, .at a regular
meeting thereof, this . 114 day of • • C..�.11 /.4..Z • 1975-
✓
clearing, excavation or filling which
. Mayor
Date Approved
are
(Not approved by the Nayor)
City of Tukwila
Resolution No. 489
Interim Land Use Council Directive:
August 18, 1975
Notice to Applicants for a Rezone, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Actions
with significant negative environmental impacts, or development in areas of
natural hazards.
Summary: Resolution No. 489 of the City of Tukwila directs that
no applications for a rezone or comprehensive plan amendment
shall be accepted or processed by the City until a new Land
Use Policy Plan is completed and adopted. This also applies
to certain actions which are precedent setting, have signi-
ficant negative environmental effects or in areas of natural
limitations.
Section 4 of the attached resolution specifies which actions'
are affected.
Duration: This resolution will be effective until the first regular
council meeting in July, 1976, after which the City Council
will consider the extension or repeal of its provisions.
Should a new comprehensive plan be adopted prior to this
date, the resolution will automatically be void.
Waiver: Provisions are included in Section 5 of the resolution for
an applicant to request a waiver upon the showing of facts and
other evidence as specified in forms available from the City.
Procedure: Attached is an application form to request a waiver of the
provisions of this resolution. The City Council will review
your request pursuant to Section 5 of Resolution No. 489.
Prior to being presented to the City Council, the Planning
Department will prepare a staff report with a recommendation
based on an analysis of the following type of criteria:
1. Is the proposed action consistent with the presently
emerging Land Use Policy Plan?
( 2. Does the proposed action represent a unique condition
which is insignificant in scale and to which no other
apparent alternatives are reasonable?
3. If the request for waiver involves grading, excavation,
filling or development in geographical areas identified
as having potential natural limitations for development,
are mitigating measures provided?
4. Do the requirements contained in Resolution No. 489 impose
a special hardship to a site for which a waiver of the
provisions would not necessitate a major policy conunittment
prior to the adoption of the Land Use.Policy Plan?
•
(Please type or print)
Date of Application: November 25, 1975
Name of Applicant: Harvey M. Anderson
flailing Address:
City: Seattle Zip
Ownership Interest in Property:
South 180th and Strander.Blvd.
-/.1711 Y Q --e3
CITY OF TUKWILA
APPLICATION FOR WAIVER
From the Provisions of
Resolution Number 489
contract purchaser
P.O. Box 88074 Tukwila Branch
98188 Phone :
Legal Description of Property Affected:
77'1 /JCi N /vv 770V SDU . dX" oia 7,7
✓ed Nw 56c, 26, r: 3/I, /e 4 S W Mt.; 7( /41c' Ccc)hM'
14145N., L Y /NC 6:457 01=" S'17 E H /CHO AY NO. a .4w4)
41V 5r Or :50U7rlC&J f L VD.
General Location of Property: West fide Southrenter Parkway,
244 -5360
between
1. State specifically the action in Resolution No. 489, Section 4 to which ou are
requesting a waiver: 5'c,
4, 4. ' ' z4 -i -ny 1
7 4w."-e-44
2. Describe specifically the action you are proposing, including dimensional infor-
mation about the development, site maps, etc., i f available: The construction
of a single story reinforced concrete structure, approximately 90'x45' adjacent to Southcenter
'arkway will have a surfaced arkin_ area. The cons -
;lightly over 66 percent of the site only, the balance to the West will be left in its natural
Mate and undisturbed
•I/
. • • .. .
c
3. What is your justification for your request: (Please refer to items 1-4 on the
cover sheet and respond to then.) The area is the largest retail shopping outlet in
the state. Therefore creating a unique condition of high density vehicular traffice and
producing an ideal location to dispense automobile oriented products. For approximately
a quarter mile along the east side of Southcenter Parkway retail establishments have
flurished. The amoeboid actions of retail outlets both North and South of the location
have produced a quasi residential area i.e best in this vicinity and therefore will not
necessitate a major policy committment.
(attach additional sheet, if necessary)
4. What other factual evidence is relevant.to your request for waiver (such asexist-
ing development in the vicinity of your property, soils and geologic investiga-
tions, etc.): The site is situated with one of the most highly used section, of
the freeway to its West and the states' most concentrated trade center to the North and
•
Eas
of Southcenter Parkway will be classified commercial.
(Attach any other information available which substantiates your request)
Date Received.:
Received by:
Date scheduled before City Council:
Action of City Council:
Date of City Council Action:
• (for office use only)
w
(date)
15 March 1976
CITY OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard.
City Clerk
. Shirlee Kinney.
7:30 P.M.
(time)
SL
Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila CITY COUNCIL
will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th
Avenue South, to consider a request to•REZONE, from R -1 to C -2, a parcel of
property, approximately ; acre in size, generally located 1000 feet.south of
Strander Boulevard on the west side of Southcenter Parkway.
For a legal description of the property or further information contact Gary
Crutchfield at 242 -2177.
Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on 29 February & 7 March 1976 .
r
26 February 1976
(date)
Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION
will conduct a PUBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th
Avenue South, to consider a request to REZONE, from R -1 to C -2. a
parcel'of property, approximately ; acre in size,
generally located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway approximately
600 feet south of Strander Boulevard.
All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard.
For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at 242 -2177.
Published in the Renton Record - Chronicle on
CIT`( OF TUKWILA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
8:00 P.M.
(time)
. Richard Kirsop, Vice- Chajrman'
Tukwila Planning Commission
11 & 18 February 1976
STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF KING
Barbara...Cemp.8gn4
of
Feb..
V.P.C. Form No. 87
t'NO
Affidavit of Publication
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
ss.
being first duly sworn on
oath, deposes and says that ... the .. ch.ia ...eierk of
THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4)
times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and
has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred
to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news-
paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington,
and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained
at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton
Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the
Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County,
Washington. That the annexed isa •P�ib1•�C �ee.ri<lgf
Fleming. ••C•ommt•®eton,i•••Reson.
as it was published in regular issues (and
not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period
consecutive issues, commencing on the
3,.1... day of Feb ,19 ...7.6 .., and ending the
�,8... day of Feb.. ,19..76., both dates
inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub-
scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee
charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $.9.12, which
has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the
first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent
insertion.
,19...76
c.hiaf...c.lerk
18
day of
Notary Public in and for the State of Wjshington,
residing at Kent, K9ng County.
— Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June
9th, 1955.
— Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures,
adopted by the newspapers of the State.
TO: Tukwila Planning Commission
FROM: Mayor. Ed Bauch
SUBJECT: Anderson Rezone
MEMORANDUM
CITY of TU KW ILA
cc: Anderson Rezone Application Master File
DATE: Feb. 18, 1976
This memorandum is just a reminder that this property was excluded from the
storm drainage L.I.D. #27 since it was zoned for single - family purposes.
This land does effect storm drainage within the area of L.I.D. #27 and I ,
strongly urge the Commission that if they recommend approval of the rezone
application, that as a condition of approval they recommend that the property
be charged an equitable amount to, L.I.D. #27.
December 4, 1975
Dear Mr. Jacobs:
KS /cw
Kell Stoknes
Planning Director
c
CITY of TUKWILA
6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD.
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067
Mr. Walter Jacobs
P.O. Box 88074
Tukwila Branch Station
Seattle, Washington 98188
Frank Todd, Mayor
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RE: Anderson Rezone Application
Please be advised that the waiver request to apply for a rezone application
under resolution 489 was considered by the City Council during their regular
meeting of December 3, 1975 and placed in the Community Affairs Committee
for further study. I anticipate this matter will come before the Community
Affairs Committee for their discussion on December 10, 1975, at 5:30 P.M.
the City Annex at 6230 Southcenter Boulevard.
If the Community Affairs Committee considers it December 10, 1975 it will go
again before the entire City Council during their regular meeting of December
15, 1975. If they allow the application to be accepted by staff as staff has
recommended, it can be published and considered before the Tukwila Planning
Commission during their regular meeting of January 22, 1976. If the Planning
Commission recommends approval of the rezone application at that time, it can
be taken before the full City Council during their first meeting in February,
that is, February 2, 1976. The City Council generally takes two meetings
before making a final decision on any matter. This means the earliest date
your rezone application could be approved at this rate would be February 16,
1976
The above time schedule indicates the best potential timing available. Any
controversies or delays in any of the meetings could delay this time frame.
I hope this answers the questions voiced by you in our conversation on the
telephone earlier today.
Very truly yours,
Seasonal High Water Table
,
Flood I- Iazard
Low Shear Strength
Slope
4./
c. �--
"----- _
Slippage Potential
w,ad e - .% /-
Compressibility
Organic Soil
Shrink Swell Potential
Pollution Potential
Coarse Textured Subsoil
•
Slow Permeability in Subsoil
Very Gravelly
Depth to Bedrock, 20 -40"
SOILS WORKSHEET
FILE NO.: MP- 75 -23 -R
NAME: Anderson
SOIL TYPE: AkF
MAP NO.: 10
Degree of Limitation:
Reason for Limitation:
Soil Related Comments:
Recommendations:
Essential
4
Other Consideration
Foundation
for low
Buildings
PLANK ; DEPARTMENT
Shallow
Excava-
tions
Septic Tank
Filter
Fields
V, YP
1. Install streets, utilities and storm drains prior to construction.
2. Design and management of surface drainage systems should be planned
prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All
water should be conveyed to a safe, non- erosive outlet.
Design and management of sub - surface drainage system should be planned
prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All
water should be conveyed to a safe, non - erosive outlet.
. Avoid soil disturbance during rainy season.
5 Seeding, mulching, netting and mechanical forms of protection can be
used to stabilize exposed soils.
6. Brush and small trees should be chipped for erosion controlling mulch
material.
7. Vegetation which is not required to be removed because of construction
should be retained to help reduce soil erosion or stabilize slopes.
. Avoid over - the -slope dumping of soil, vegetative waste or debris.
9. Denuded ground should be protected as soon as construction allows,
but not later than October 1.
10. All road designs should utilize available soils information.
11. All stockpiles of excavated soil should have erosion protection at all
times.
12. An explanation of what is to be done with excavated soil should
accompany the final plan.
SCS
Date
r
Seasonal High Water Table
J
�-
---"—
Flood Hazard
1--" •
Low Shear Strength
t...---
Slope
Slippage Potential
Compressibility
Organic Soil
Swell Potential.
Pollution Potential
Coarse Textured Subsoil
Slow Permeability in Subsoil
.
Very Gravelly
Depth to Bedrock, 20 -40"
SOILS WORKSHEET
FILE NO.:
NAME:
SOIL TYPE:
MAP NO.:
Degree of Limitation:
Reason for Limitation:
Soil Related Comments:
Recommendations:
Essen ti
(
(�I
MF- 75 -23 -R
ANDERSON
Wo
10
1.
Other Considerations:
F t
Foundation
for low
Buildings
v"_a f-Ca. �ea+l .s 1, ow- zf'
Install streets, utilities and storm drains prior to construction.
2. Design and management of surface drainage systems should be planned
prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All
water should be conveyed to a safe, non - erosive outlet.
3. Design and management of sub - surface drainage system should be planned .
prior to construction and implemented according to that plan. All
water should be conveyed to a safe, non - erosive outlet.
4. Avoid soil disturbance during rainy season.
5. Seeding, mulching, netting and mechanical forms of protection can be
used to stabilize exposed soils.
6. Brush and small trees should be chipped for erosion controlling mulch
material.
7. Vegetation which is not required to be removed because of construction
should be retained to help reduce soil erosion or stabilize slopes.
8. Avoid over -the -slope dumping of soil, vegetative waste or debris.
9. Denuded ground should be protected as soon as construction allows,
but not later than October 1.
(v)/ 10. All road designs should utilize available soils information.
11. All stockpiles of excavated soil should have erosion protection at all
times.
12. An explanation of what is to be done with excavated soil should
accompany the final plan.
SCS
PLAN( . DEPARTMENT
Shallow
Excava-
tions
Septic Tank
Filter
Fields
r
. CITY OF TUKWILA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE
This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit
from the city of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official
that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other
forms have been developed for single- family home applications and legislation
proposals.
BACKGROUND DATA:
1. Name of applicant: Team Research Planning Co.
2. Address and phone of Applicant: S1J) Strander Blyd., Seattle, Wa. 98188
3. Project name: Park TanP
4. Project location: Approx. building address'16799 Southcenter Parkway
5. Nature and brief description of proposal: Retail tire distributorship with
3 bags fnr automobile wheel goods servicing.
6. tstimatea compietion'date: Approximately 90 days to complete
7. Do you have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: No.
- 8.'What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this
project?
(a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES X NO
(b) King County Hydrolics Permit YES- X . NO
(c) Building permit YES X .N0
(d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES NO X
(e) Sewer hookup permit YES X NO
(f) Sign permit •. YES x NO
(g) Water hook up permit YES NO
(h) Storm water system permit YES X NO
(i) Curb cut permit YES X NO
(j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES X NO
(k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES X NO
(1) Other
Excavation permit.
• 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposal? If yes, explain.: No.
10. Agency requiring checklist: Cit of Tukwila, D
11. Accepted by agency on: 2-g - {o by:
(to be filled in by city upoi receipt of check 1
.rtia
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.)
Yes Maybe No
Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a)
Unstable earth conditions or in
any changes in geologic sub-
structures:
(b) Disruptions, displacements
•or overcovering of the soils:
(c) Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
(d) The destruction, covering, or
modification of any unique
geologic or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on
or off the site?
(f) Changes in deposition or •
erosion of beach sands, or
• in changes in siltation,
deposition, or erosion which
may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed, of
the ocean or any bay, inlet
or lake?
Explanation:
Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable
odors?
(c) Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or
in any change in climate, •
either locally or regionally?
Explanation:
X
X
X
Water. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in currents, or the
• course or direction of water
movements, in either marine
or fresh waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the
amount of surface water run-
off?
(c) Alterations to the course or
• flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface
water in any watercourse?
(e)
Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of sur-
face.•water quality, including
temperature or turbidity?
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of
ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals,
or through interception of an
acquifer by cuts or excavations?
(h) Deterioration in ground water
quality, either through direct
injection, or through the seep-
age of leachate, phosphates,
detergents, waterborne virus
or bacteria, or other substances
.into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public
water supplies?
(f)
(g)
Explanation:
Blacktop paving and building roof. drainage.
X
X
.s Maybe No
•
X
X
X
Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of flora
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, micro -flora and aquatic
plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of flora?
(c) Introduction of new species of
flora into an area, or in a bar-
rier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
. Explanation:
By area occupied•by building and parking area.
Explanation:
• Fauna.* Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of fauna
(birds, land animals including rep -
tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of fauna?
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna
into an area, or result in a.barrier
to the or movement of fauna?
(d) Deterioration to existing wildlife •
habitat?
Explanation:
By area occupied by building and parking area.
Noise.- Will the proposal increase exist-
ing noise levels?
Yes Maybe, No
X
X•
X
X
X
Light and Glare. .Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
Explanation: '
Lighted sign and building night lights.
land Use. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of the present or planned land
use of an area?
Explanation:
Presently. zoned residential.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal re-
sult in:
. (a) Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resource?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat-
ural resource?
Explanation:
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
Explanation:
Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
Explanation:
Yes Maybe No
Housing Will the proposal affect existing
,housing availability, or create a demand for
additional housing? • X
Explanation:
Rezone from residential to commercial would affect housing availability.
Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro-
posal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular
movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon existing transportation
systems?
(d) Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods?
(e) Alterations to waterborne or air
traffic?
Explanation:
vA,c``'\
Local Services. Will the proposal have an
,effect upon, or result in a need for new
services in any of the following areas:
(a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
(f) Other'governmental services?
Explanation:
-5-
:Yes Maybe No
•
•
X
X
"X
'X
Enemy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy?
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
Explanation:
Heating and electrical power.
Explanation:
C 4.
i).1
Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or alterations to the follow-
ing utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas?
(b) .Communications systems?
(c) Water ?
(d) Sewer or septic tanks?
(e) Storm water drainage?
(f) Solid waste and disposal?
Explanation;
Human Health. Will the proposal result in the
creation of any health hazard or potential .
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically offensive
site open to public view?
Explanation:
•
Yes Maybe No
X
X
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of ex-
isting recreational opportunities?
Explanation:
Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal
result in an alteration of a significant
archeological or historical site?
Explanation:
Revenue. Will the proposal cause a signifi-
ca` nt increase in city revenues?
Explanation:
Employment. Will the proposal create a
significant amount of new jobs?
. Explanation:
• Yes playbes No
X
X
Project Name:
Signature ancl;Title
Park Lane
BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY
ACTION BY OTHER' DEPARTMENTS:
CITY OF TUKWILA
1. Date of Review: Building by:
Planning ;2 Th by:
Engineering by:
Police by:
Fire by:
2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that:
':.The project is exempt by definition.
Staff Person
June 24, 11),
CERTIFICATION BY APPLICANT:
I hereby certify that the information furnished in this environmental checklist
sheet is true and accurate to the / b -st.of my knowledge.
il c, 6
Walter C. Jacobs, Environmental Design Officer
Project Address:Approx. building address: ]6799 Southcenter Parkway
Date •
Date .
gna ure and. itle of Responsible •f icia
3. Applicant was notified of decision on:
'by by '
Date
( +) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be'done.
(-). Means recommend a full environmental impact statement'not'be'done:
Check one
( +) or ( -)
( +) or 01
( +) or ( -)
( +) or ( -)
( +) or (--)
1
The project has no significant environmental impact and application
should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects.
The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ -.:::
mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for permit.
More specific information is needed to determine impact.
•
Letter, phone
In accordance with Washington State Environmental. Policy Act and City of Tukwila
Ordinance No.• 759.
8I<8o8 A.eIrn
NJ
�,
\ c v
� 2
��
�•
RECEIPT: ' Date r" .19
f " 0 5
Received Fro '., ^ �' •.� .,;* ��, .•.:
A , • ress
�, ' ....1 �..'• /� . I c `
,•.> rs $ ...•
Fort .• 'rte L-- ( -..= %� -.. .. ... . •
ACCOUNT
HOW PAID
��''— -� • •
AMT. OF
ACCOUNT
CASH • .
p�
- ';`
(• ,
.: . ' l' • ` .�! C= •i :-. L..•
_
n
f V
• AMT, PAID
CHECK
.!,..A.cE
Due
; .
\ a
. ORDER
� 1
8I<8o8 A.eIrn
TELEPHONE
2551.8621
City of Tukwila
Tukwila Planning Department
Tukwila, Wa .
Gentlemen,
LAW OFFICES OF
HUGH F. CARNEY
311 MORR #e AVE. , P ;J BOX 567
RENTON WAS ^ 98055
December 22, 1975
Re: The North 100 ft. South 400 ft. SE 1/4 NE 1/4
section 26, Township . 5 North, Range 4 East WM,
I: Kind County, Washinton, lying East of State
Highway '5 and West of• Southcenter Boulevard
and more commonly descrihed as Lot #11, Block
?, McMicken Heights, Division `..1, unrecorded,
North 100 ft of East 350 ft. less State High -
way, less the• east 6 ft for street;
On which a rezoning application has been filed
by Harvey Anderson •
The undersigned are the fee owners of the above described real estate
for which a rezoning application has been filed with your Department..
The undersigned, as liquidating trustees, approve the above rezoning
application, and ::ave executed an Earnest Money Agreement in favor of
the petitioner^ for that rezoning.
•HC
Very truly yours,
GREENHA GUN CLUB
Hugh Carney
Liquidating Trustee. --
;%
by
Mike Lotto
Subscribed and. sworn before me
this 24V day of Nb.1 {btPM.
; +Uliil +r,
ti . �1
•
AFFIDAVIT
Harvey M. Anderson, President
I TEAM RESEARCH 6 PLANNING CO. , being duly sworn, declare that I am the
contract purchaser or owner of the property involved in this application and that
the foregoing statements and answers herein contained and the'information herewith
submitted are in all respects true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
TEAM RESEARCH 6 PLANNING CO.
Signat •'o Contract Purchaser or owner
P.O. Or
BOX 88074
Tukwilla, Wash. 98188
(City)
244 - 5360
(Nailing Address)
(Telephone)
(State)
Form C
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Appl, No.
Receipt No. 7 .)43
between Strander Blvd.
None
APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF LAUD USE CT_ASSIFICATIOU OR
MODIFICATION OF LAND USE REGULATIONS IN TITE CITY OF TUKWIIA
Planning Commission Action
Filing Date 4.S - SAN , - `E (-. City Council Action
. Hearing Date 2. f°c_ U (, Ordinance No. & Date
APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY:
Naps Team Research.8 Plannirig Co. Address 510 Strander Blvd.
( P,,,, 0. Bo b 8807 T uk aash _
ingt Telephone No.. 944 -58
Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on approx. 16799 Southcenter Parkway
and So. 180th St.
Total square footage in property 17372 s q. ft.
LEGAL DESC " ' I OF PROPlERTY North 100' South 400' SE. 1 /4NE 1/4 Section 26,
Township Range 4 EWM, King County, Washington, lying East - ofk State
Hiphwa #5 and West of Southcenter and more ,comninJ descr ibed
as Lot #11, Block #3, McMicken Heights, Division #1, unrecorded, North
100' of East 350' less State Hi•hwa less the East 6' for street.
Existing Zoning R -1 Zoning requested C-2
What are the uses you propose to. develop on this property?
Retail tire distributorshi "'
Number of permanent off - street parking spaces that will be provided on property?
13 Number required IJ
NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The following factors are considered in
reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or
additional information you desire to submit to substantiate
your request may be attached to this sheet. (See Application
Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimim, requirements.)
1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent and surrounding property from any
itacornpatible effects which may arrise as a result of the proposed land use classi_ficatic
2. What provisions will be made to provide for necessary street widening to City
minimum standards?
Street meets minimum re.uirements.
3. What provisions will be made for adecaate sewer and water service?
intersection.
4. Any other conments which the petitioner feels are appropriate:
W
5IDE.0 t)O
FT s of 4 5VANDEK
OL
yi��•�. 4tyvl���Ylb 'iiG' �'1_ �.'�rL�.+i..�.
11 xs s tom dr.
I II w .
a lloIzTH I I �.
°....
L t. t ti .tt«. ✓.+•=•'t"- '�.c... .n,.ry.. «iJtii
VI,c.IN•i MAP
sukl,e I" s
u..iou r.<Inc 17•n.
p __r •
Le641. r3
1)-I0 , t(P.1 H loo F otrrN 40o F r. SE I/4 NE Vk G ✓.C410t4
,Tov0401- P 5 NORTH, RpN 4- EAST, WM•,IN k11-14
u(4 - rY, W/4 141NCt L it BAST OF WbAW / S
WeST O7I. tt SoUlEVac?n AND MoRe.
OOMMO1 (. I •SIP' ,AS Lo-r • (I, $(QC,FC 3,
MCs71'I164 ..N 140 -44HT5 T h I410N #'( 0I.1Fz.E'.C.oav , NowTN
109 Fr' `O 41:.1 550 FT L1✓h5 STaTit^ 1
;'1_I.IE rare.
•
l
A
•
1' K V V I Y, m
•
•
tkitoi‘
n --
~�•.,�'^�,\, „'4""v e+.iu.o i :4,."l w.yr+ ...�„w"f+4 "�' Sr;lco
.rua.wwno.
12 " 9r Ea
4l
IC 'fn4P.pN0,.. .
• PaI:tP.. PIPE
,<I61I•4 ,AoN•
....
10 HATER
n .0,
•
` .. =n
2 � 7 N
• ' $
TI t.l7Y eVk
t.IbNT S'(ANDORV (TYP) 't•st .),
3oo.ao r
PETt0 EJM OLyMPIG PIPt_
...I.. .. ._ ..._- ........ .. ...... .... _ .. _ ..�� ..
" al'roA''muvttsows.v. , swnwlw w+ , ...,.� --- ...,...,,.wrK�
•
I I' 11' l° I I ( "P ICI` Jf I I I I I I' I I I' I I .(h I I IIt 1 i1 I I I I I _-
�11���11�111��11�111��1+ I1 I
11111' ���I1�1��' 1��11( 111'.�rll�i�i�jlI�r,.j.1ri.�1 �_ - .�•
2 5 6
8,"
2
p onn wnl � 3 4 7
FLEXIBLE RULER -3 U 2AW ..... ...— r.
Oe 62 86 LZ I 92 SZ 7Z CZ Z lZ OZ 61 Ell LI 91 91 71 'El 21 11 p(1
J1 111111u1u11bu1I�luI11nIIg11911I1111bni1111A1iy1m l 111111111�I1111 .11111111111111, 111114oulllubin1nn 0 111111 1 11 I 1uA 1 d 11 n 1n u 11 pl li lu 11111111116 Jn
—. (00 -00
N00° ,8' 44' V7
C G INTE-kJAL
-5o
\I/
a
IF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS
CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO
THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT':
Ole
"mow. � rrv.
' 66 if
7. 14 . .` i
w+TlxyMYRT
o
t- w
74
•
35
6
•IAG, FbK WI401...fX*LN E- 5-02.1 E/u -r Rst4 P
WAtT4.4 fi IM
t.. o
7 14.
Le. 1 'tht.O NG 4050 5F.
El
■
P /\R ' LJNE
Tr" 0. • is
•j - 1 7 ;;F•1 71 ‘.. fNl.�f
50'
100
SOUT!-1GC'■TER, PKWY.
, cA(- 1" 'LO
ID
15 -23 -FZ _.
10
Pl..14 T•La..
IU
0
z
c
TEAM RESEARCH a PLANNING COMPANY
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98188
AREA CODE (206) 244 -5360,
SCALE ='.' I'
DATE:....;
DW N;
JOB' NO::.
•