Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit 76-23-R - LUTES BURTON - REZONEmf 76-23-r 13903 interurban avenue south lutes burton rezone COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 9 ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R -1 ZONING TO C -2 ZONING WITHIN THE CITY OF TUKWILA. WHEREAS, Burton Lutes, the owner of the following described property having petitioned the Planning Commission, requesting reclassification of said property from R -1 zoning to C -2 zoning in conformance with the comprehensive plan, all contained in the Planning Department File Number 76 -23 -R, and; property for cbrrrcrcia1 u:cs, and; 0 015 �x G• TUKW11 WHEREAS, on July 22, 1976, a public hearing on said petition was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Tukwila and after said hearing made a favorable recommendation thereon, and; WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Tukwilr considered the matter in a public meeting and concurred with the recommendation of the Planning Commis- sion. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or TUKWILA, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the real property located on tie west side of Interurban Avenue in the vicinity of 57th Avenue South and which is unore clearly described in Exhibit "A" to this ordinance is hereby reclassified to C-2 and the City Council hereby adopts the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" as illustrative of the property described herein. • Section 2. The rezoning to C -2 is subject to the stipulation that any development of the property classified for commercial use by this action shall not excavation of the land lying above elevation 2, the original toe of the slope. Section 3. The zoning map adopted by reference by ordinance Number 251 is hereby amended to reflect the changes by the rezoning aaction taken in this ordinance. Section 4. The City Clerk is directed to recor:.d a copy of this ordinance and attachments with the King County Department of Recordhs and Elections. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, and approved by the Mayor at a regular meeting thereof this Q7 day of ,•Gt•c 4c..Z__- , 1976. pproved as to form: City Attorney Published in Record Chronicle: August 8, 1976 Attest: Mayor City Clerk Pro T EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION FOR BURTON LUTES: BUSH, RO HITCHIIVGS, P. S., Inc. THAT PORTION OF LOTS y THROUGH 11, BLOCK 3, AND LOT 10, BLOCK 8, ALL IN HILLMAN'S SEATTLE' GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED I N VOLUME 11 OF .PLATS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF ^ .KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, VACATED 57TH AVENUE SOUTH, VACATED.SOUTH 139TH STREET, THE STEVEN FOSTER' DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38 AND THE JOSEPH FOSTER DONATION. LAND CLAIM NO. 39 IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,. RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: • . COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, SAID BLOCK 3 WHICH IS SOUTH 89 °00'12" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 33 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 °00'12" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 145.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF 57TH AVENUE ' SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 1 °08'48" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 101.99 FEET . TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH— . WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH EASTERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 8 ; - THENCE NORTH 46°18 EAST ALONG SAID EXTENSION AND NORTHWESTERLY • LINE 181.66 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE (STATE HIGHWAY 5 —M); THENCE NORTH•43 °41'12" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 43 WEST 220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°18'48" WEST 23 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 20 °48'02" WEST FROM THE POINT OF • COMMENCEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 20 0 118'02" EAST 238.80 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46 °18'48" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 46 °18'48" EAST 327.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BE— GINNING. . • 'JOB 19420 3/31/76 ALH ' 1• \ •' L � ' . ' F ig • \ \ • ? \ • •rat. .04,1.1 ' ?0_ 83 \y JF U ,. .1 0 •:) u 1:. Jrde ,= i O"5 AC. 0 AG 4 ' j' \ \ • ci %! 7 \ 1. • J. /�a� ,•aa �' „DON.STII�IJ• ;C •r 1 (, l .'C 7 LiPMF11) S' ^, -. — - --__.. f . . 1..7.'4- •r:• rL:,L :.1•f�.•.,�.a. t / ••a ; �'� / 1 3.i . .ra -r, • ~, ' i I,.I 1 vJrb cs 4444— - - � y (a✓� 1 1 . � I .P J n; ' , II.‘ -• . 1..=.:.-_:;,;7 j `. \. I I i � ,M° 1. Jro c �c is 1 Lb e • • r t I LI , • 144 Z5I . ••••• • . ..,.•.,._..0∎4• s 4.44.• to (4.4 r • f n1c /. I l ! • • 140.'5 a J / A(11 ee • i/ a C• 7110 ' ED)2G F �' o,GC. 131pS o j0 13 • 13: �7 �, . 13 `; o,JF. /.. r: Q ALBERT' E. DOWSING.. l.0 AG. , , v, 0.63 M. • Id0 /Q t/ vs 1333$Lv - Jruc.r' N o 1.J: Ll /- : , f b • • �, 1 7 1 .:... T + ��L 7 1 • : ,� 1 'i i , 4 /f -p/c) T ; .:i s ' 1. ,I rJ•, 77:- f , * v , ::;c. ' T j '• ; • : ;�I:: ���r ,.,1. /. 1 �)1 • '- N 46� ,, 1 it " .... 4 4 n..r /.✓444 L• ~ J 0 . 1'. 5 (.. %U e./y,..i•1 u.0 X37 y ,J eAC• 1 1c •`•05 VACn .14/8 .• .4••••••• • n I...+. . f n •T• �.. •• Il•3 . _. Lt� 1 .3:• .� 1 r' I a „I• .I • q PL. 1 ,. f r „� • ` - 4444... • 1/45 1 ,.ue.,t • i ;z ( • 15 rid . 14 17 .r•w..rw•• •• .a :G l2 t •54 �, 444_4— _.�...,►.: 13. I 3 «.•.. ;17 �9 • ;.• ■-� 1 20 � .. . 4444 4444. •. ••. • ''?t , i0,`'/ •• . •• 4444 84.• •• . r r` • • 4 f 9 e • ti) • .h f kJ G r t. ; .,/..—•:::„..........., • .... 27 .; r , rJ V•' J j�•tZc ▪ ^ ^ C�Jv:: " t�JC!'.:vL r ' ^ GOC'� i '' `l i � .: .,..,, ,..:....... 5.....L....... vv .. Q ( / /ij�'Ul 4 _ : s -; ' O R) `40 /. \ s / \' I. a i. Cr 14 /P! 17 - „,®16 13 18 L 14117 ° 12 19 — - 141 �0 1 20 ....— a 1.39,•.3 0 I IQl'06 ._ C4 .. v P . � ` � Siti, 23 { 215 5 r 7 24 gin i42 1 116, 25 4 21 ED __. 4 ' .'I ( v " YI _' -. _.. . -_ I ti 1a'!.,,.. 2 et! 1 /14 29 1 i' J f Z c J Me 4.. 1 19 R 1 • . - - { � .> 1-1 • FI / r STER O'1'.4.-.--- LAl4} ." ,✓� G /l .1/ • " ;: ItITE5 B f 5 ; AG T CeC, a ; . 3 '1:1-11';- - - ▪ r T t' Jl4:: 7 4 /:._ °` : i cC 3 i rUC 1L Id ` : , J / - UC 1 L.y� R - -e".Z d '4.'15 a !e. G ♦r J t (t1 13. a 13 5 .. ,e // a _ • r 2 t. h l-J� — o 0 I c / �, $ /cC a7 .-. �0 me ` -) 14112 I ]13970 I 'i:; O / '1 ( I S� J t �: !Pi .. IA/ E. 4rEPN,EY• FOSf DOA /Arr0.ti C.:JAIA+ h_ l i 1 { 11 1 °-.11 11 1t. 191^ 1 1 . ,1_ 1 •' I I a iv 3 Imo; 1 � . JCIes: I l ,0 10 11 j12 (� ;Y I •:a l == 8 H3 I .733 1 1 14- "7 I 6 1 15 5 i 16 y 4 ; ,1 r 3 I e, (O /v /S/DN ST) 403 , -..8 ■ 14 • - � J -- ^ -6 7 /► D • NOT S T OPEN � r �VL1 101 n N ✓ /a cre r! 74 t1 PIBLRT E. DOWSING_ .il UC ✓F Ce.0 11 18 D 1:6 • 1oS yrC,a /4 /ST T' - - - - 16" f IIC)9 I ,1 I I� I4135 ti N rn c m 4 17 zzs 3` 1 4 • o Q � • 0 68 Ac ij (192 13 14 23 1 /44TH 9 1 ti • ' 1 I R ♦� :at/.' I Sr 1 • GOLF KroII Pe,.5E C) ■ 6j 5 31 4 h31` 3 '3D a�Ni6�tAN0 ORJ S . /a[ ;.!z b 42 1 I' 2,3.44 Ni:',.'" ','. 14 1 x 2 a 1.39,•.3 0 6 , .4 __ I5 142 i5 5 16 14211, _ e3.sr 4 ' .'I ( 17 ... ` } /_ 1 . 3 }f 1' 18 v /24 L.L -, - 4.. 1 19 R 1 T4 (.'s , ..y.47r r' • . - - { � .> 1-1 • FI / r STER O'1'.4.-.--- LAl4} ." ,✓� G /l .1/ • " ;: ItITE5 B f 5 ; AG T CeC, a ; . 3 '1:1-11';- - - ▪ r T t' Jl4:: 7 4 /:._ °` : i cC 3 i rUC 1L Id ` : , J / - UC 1 L.y� R - -e".Z d '4.'15 a !e. G ♦r J t (t1 13. a 13 5 .. ,e // a _ • r 2 t. h l-J� — o 0 I c / �, $ /cC a7 .-. �0 me ` -) 14112 I ]13970 I 'i:; O / '1 ( I S� J t �: !Pi .. IA/ E. 4rEPN,EY• FOSf DOA /Arr0.ti C.:JAIA+ h_ l i 1 { 11 1 °-.11 11 1t. 191^ 1 1 . ,1_ 1 •' I I a iv 3 Imo; 1 � . JCIes: I l ,0 10 11 j12 (� ;Y I •:a l == 8 H3 I .733 1 1 14- "7 I 6 1 15 5 i 16 y 4 ; ,1 r 3 I e, (O /v /S/DN ST) 403 , -..8 ■ 14 • - � J -- ^ -6 7 /► D • NOT S T OPEN � r �VL1 101 n N ✓ /a cre r! 74 t1 PIBLRT E. DOWSING_ .il UC ✓F Ce.0 11 18 D 1:6 • 1oS yrC,a /4 /ST T' - - - - 16" f IIC)9 I ,1 I I� I4135 ti N rn c m 4 17 zzs 3` 1 4 • o Q � • 0 68 Ac ij (192 13 14 23 1 /44TH 9 1 ti • ' 1 I R ♦� :at/.' I Sr 1 • GOLF KroII Pe,.5E C) ■ 6j 5 31 4 h31` 3 '3D a�Ni6�tAN0 ORJ S . /a[ ;.!z b 42 1 I' , 1976 $ 12 76 Social Security, Fire Fighters - Cont. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES Ord. #984 - Reclassifying certain property from R -1 ' to C -2, Burton Lutes Attorney hard stated that it is the Council's choice, and it is the issue before them. The Fire Fighters will make their decision once they know what the City Council is willing to do or not willing to do as far as participation in some sort of a pension program. Hill stated that they are waiting for the Council to make a proposal, and they keep saying this is not a negotiable item, but it is dollars and cents, and it is negotiable in any contract. Traynor explained that this would not keep a Fire Fighter from collecting Social Security. He could retire from the fire service at age 50 and start work elsewhere so that at age 62 - 65, he could collect Social Security also. Van Dusen questioned as to whether the original motion is out of order and suggested that the City's contribution, whatever the percentage is, be made a part of the negotiation package. Traynor stated that the Fire Fighters still have the right to vote whether they want to be in Social Security or not but, by this motion, we are not going to help then. Theircurrent contribution to Social Security stays in the City. Harris stated she is not in favor of supporting the request either, for several reasons: the long term results, detailed alternate plans have not been presented, and the bookkeeping on the part of the City needs to be studied. Ken Brush, Fire Department, stated they would like to meet with the Council again and discuss this further. Van Dusen agreed that, to be fair, they would listen to any ideas they might have. *TRAYNOR WITHDREW HIS ORIGINAL MOTION, SAUL WITHDREW THE SECOND. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT IF THE FIRE FIGHTERS DETERMINE NOT TO TAKE PART IN SOCIAL SECURITY,THE CITY'S MATCHING FUNDS WILL STAY IN THE GENERAL FUND. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY PESICKA, TO POSTPONE THIS DISCUSSION FOR ONE MONTH PENDING INVESTIGATION OF SPECIFIC FINANCIAL PLANS FOR AN ALTERNATE TO SOCIAL SECURITY. MOTION CARRIED. ROLL CALL VOTE: 4 AYES - GARDNER, HARRIS, PESICKA, SAUL. 3 NOS - HILL, TRAYNOR, VAN DUSEN. Van Dusen stated that the 30 days will be up and this should go on the agenda for the September 7, 1976, Regular Meeting. Hill asked if there are no meetings held before then, what good is it going to do to bring the question back to the table? Mayor Bauch stated that whether something is done or not, the motion will come back to the floor. MOVED BY TRAYNOR, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read an ordinance reclassifying certain property from R -1 zoning to C -2 zoning within the City of Tukwila. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO SUSPEND THE RULE FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 984 AS READ.* Harris questioned the second whereas, since we do have an existing Comprehensive Plan, why refer to the pending Comprehensive Plan up date. She stated that an ordinance for rezone should not contain language which says it is consistent with something that has not yet been adopted. MOVED BY HARRIS, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO AMEND TIIE ORDINANCE BY DELETING 'WHEREAS, THE PENDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ALSO SHOWS THE PROPOSED PROPERTY FOR COMMERCIAL USES, AND'. MOTION CARRIED. • 1976 FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES - Cont. ✓ Ord. -/984 - Cont. Ord. x;985 - Establishirrg Legal Holidays for Municipal Employees RESOLUTIONS Proposed Resolution - Authorizing Mayor to Execute Agreement for Joint Dispatch Service Proposed Resolution - Authorizing Mayor to Negotiate and Execute Agreement with Northwest Cablevision Res. #x547 - Authorizing Mayor to Execute an Easement w i t h King County for access to the Green River * ORIGINAL MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED WITH HARRIS VOTING NO. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT T� (F �Pp5A �DINANCE BE READ BY TITLE ONLY, INCLUDING SECTION 1 (a).'''` �i y Attorney Hard read an Ordinance of the City of Tukwila, Washington, establishing legal holidays for municipal employees and amending Section 2.52.030 of the Tukwila Municipal Code No. 822. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO SUSPEND THE RULE FOR SECOND READING AND ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 985 AS READ. MOTION CARRIED WITH HIARRIS VOTING NO. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY PESICKA, THAT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement to provide a joint dispatch service for the Police and Fire Departments. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THIS BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR THE COMMITTEE OF THE t'IHOLE MEETING OF AUGUST 9, 1976, AND THAT THE FIRE AND POLICE CHIEFS BE ASKED TO ATTEND. MOTION CARRIED. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, THAT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read a resolution authorizing the Mayor to negotiate and execute an agreement with Northwest Cablevision for participation in T.V. Cable undergrounding. Van Dusen asked Mr. Grinstead of TelePrompter Cable T.V. how many feet of cable they had laid this week? Mr. Grinstead stated that when they went out to check, the trenching had been suspended as the companies were pulling cable through the conduit. Saul asked if they could get a bond for $17,000. Mr. Nelson stated that they had furnished.a bond for $10,000. Mr. Hard, after reviewing a copy of the bond, stated that the bond does guarantee performance under the franchise. Harris asked Mr. Nelson if TelePrompter had notified the City of rate increases. Mr. Nelson stated that the City had been notified by mail. Since no one could remember having seen such a letter, Mr. Nelson agreed to send a copy he had on file dated September 19, 1976, to the Council. Mr. Nelson again stated that, since ,they.:cannot:afford _to:,bcar full cost of undergrounding, they would be grateful if..the City. could financially assist TelePrompter. But, if the City cannot, they would withdraw gracefully. Van Dusen stated that since TelePrompter had reneged on their agreem€ before and, if City funds are going to be committed now, he wants to be sure that if they reneged again, the bond will assure some compensation for the City. Mayor Bauch stated that the City wants its investment protected by bonding equal to the amount of the investment. Mr. Nelson agreed that the contract can be negotiated on this basis. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY PESICKA, THAT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION BE READ. MOTION CARRIED. Deputy City Attorney Hard read a resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute an easement with King County for access to the Green River through the Bicentennial Park. MOVED BY HILL, SECONDED BY SAUL, TO SUSPEND THE RULE FOR SECOND READING AND APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 547 AS READ. MOTION CARRIED WITH HARRIS VOTING NO.. CITY OF TUKWILA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL 26 July 1976 7:30 P.M. REZONE from R -1 -7.2 to C -2 (Burton Lutes) REQUEST: REZONE from R -1 -7.2 to C -2 APPLICANT: Burton Lutes, 13903 Interurban Avenue LOCATION: North of 57th Avenue extension at Interurban AREA: Approximately 91,000 square feet ZONING: R -1 -7.2 and C -2 COMP. PLAN: Residential and Commercial FINDINGS: 1. This application was granted a waiver from Resolution #489 by the City Council at their 21 June 1976 meeting. 2. The subject property is approximately 91,000 square feet located north of the extension of 57th Avenue along the west side of Interurban Avenue. (SEE, Exhibit "A ") 3. The irregular current zoning boundaries on the property are single - family and commercial. (SEE, Exhibit "A ") 4. The current Comprehensive Plan is vague as to the depth of the commercial strip indicated along the west side of Interurban Avenue and the current Comprehensive Plan has no policies with which to assist in any determination of that depth. (SEE, Exhibit "B ") 5. Nearly all of the property requested for rezone is level and on a plane equal to Interurban Avenue. (SEE, Exhibit "A ") 6. The southernmost portion of the subject property is characterized by a very steep slope, rising approximately 25 feet in elevation in a horizontal distance of 60 feet, or a slope of 40%. 7. The steep slope is wooded primarily with broadleaf maples and covered with thick understory vegetation, all of which provides excellent natural erosion protection. 8. All utilities necessary to accomodate commercial development are available and adequate. Planning Commission" Report to City Council Page 2 26 July 1976 9. A public hearing was conducted 22 July 1976 at which no one objected to the requested rezone. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The current Comprehensive Plan provides no guidance as to the desired depth of commercial development in this vicinity and the decision on this applica- tion should provide future guidance with regard to that ambiguity. 2. All the level land on the west side of Interurban Avenue is associated with and accessible only from Interurban Avenue, thus it maintains the same qualities as the surrounding properties which are commercially zoned. 3. The steep slopes in this vicinity begin their climb at approximately elevation 25 and, in light of their degree of slope and the existing natural erosion protection, should be left in their present state. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously recommends the City Council grant the rezone from R -1 -7.2 to C -2 with the stipulation that any development of the property classified for commercial use by this action shall not permit excavation of the land lying above elevation 25, the original toe of slope. Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Richards withdrew his motion. Motion by Mr. Richards, seconded by Mr. Bohrer to deny the fill permit applica- tion. MOTION PASSED with Mr. Link voting NO. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE (Farrell) Mr. Crutchfield noted the applicant was not present. Commission agreed to postpone the hearing to allow the applicant to be present and Chairman Mettler directed Staff to notify the applicant and nearby property owners of the new hearing date. PUBLIC HEARING - REZONE (Lutes) Page 5 22 July 1976 Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report on this item and Chairman Mettler opened the public hearing at 11:15 P.M. Mr. Burton Lutes, 13903 Interurban Avenue South, stated he desires commercial zoning on his land which is level with Interurban Avenue. The new Comprehensive Plan indicates commercial use to the toe of the slope and he anticipates no disruption of the slope in conjunction with development. Commissioners discussed maintenance of the hillside and its present wooded character. There being no further comments, Chairman Mettler closed the hearing at 11:25 P.M. Motion by Mr. Bohrer, seconded by Mr. Link and carried that based on the findings and conclusions of the Staff Report, the Commission recommends the City Council rezone the land from R -1 -7.2 to C -2 with the stipulation that any development of the property classified for commercial use by this action shall not permit excava- tion of the land lying above elevation 25, the original toe of slope. PUBLIC HEARING - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Chairman Mettler, due to the late hour and to allow Staff time to prepare a final draft, postponed the hearing on this matter until the next regular meeting in August. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Site Plan - Segale #752 Mr. Crutchfield read the Staff Report noting the proposed 60 -foot curb cut. Mr. George Hall, Segale Business Park, explained Andover Park West is a private street within Segale Business Park. Commissioners discussed application of Section 18.56.040 (TMC) to private streets and concluded it was appropriate. 22 July 1976 (date) • CITY OF TUKWILA •NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Published in the Renton. Record - Chronicle on Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila PLANNING COMMISSION will conduct a PUCBLIC HEARING on the above date at City Hall, 14475 - 59th Avenue South, to consider .a. REQUEST to-REZONE, from R -1 -7.2 (Single - family) to C -2 (Local Retail), approximately 2 acres of property generally .located at • the northwest intersection of the platted extension 57th Avenue South and Interurban Avenue. All interested persons are encouraged to appear and be heard. . Hans West, Tukwila Planning Commission For further information contact Gary Crutchfield at 242 - 2177. 8:00 P.M. (time) 7.and 14 July.'1976 Lawrence Ash 1131 South 168th ' Seattle; WA 98148 Edward Miller Pta -cc 13948 - 56th Ave-. So. Tukwila, WA 98168 Dwight Gardner Box 88633 Tukwila, WA 98067 AFFIDAVIT I, Gary Crutchfield , being duly sworn, hereby declare that all legal notice requirements of Title 18, TMC have been ful- filled and a notice has been mailed to each of the following addresses. Southcenter District Co. Inc. c/o Strander Box 88636 Tukwila, WA 98067 Mike R. Lingley 14027 Interurban Ave. So. Seattle, WA 98168 Paul K. Haggard 14000 Interurban Ave. Seattle, WA 98168 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 1976. Notary -; Piabl i c in and for the State ,of Washington, residing at a,,,/„�� Donald K. Derr 6730 So. 133rd Seattle, WA 98178 James Hagen 6711 So. 131st Seattle, WA 98178 E. V. Olson 6721 - 131st St. Seattle, WA 98178 7' STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING July , 19...76 V.P.C. Form No. 67 Affidavit of Publication ss. Bprb9 'e Campegne being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says that S 'leis the .....4 e.... 'k of THE RENTON RECORD - CHRONICLE, a newspaper published four (4) times a week. That said newspaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six months prior to the date of publication referred to, printed and published in the English language continually as a news- paper published four (4) times a week in Kent, King County, Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper. That the Renton Record - Chronicle has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior Court of the County in which it is published, to -wit, King County, Washington. That the annexed isa N4t.0 Q...4 ..pMb:!� ............... 11 0.Qxt lBa... 'lona 4th CQR '4l, .lAQn... ReQUe E.t.... ..t.Q...Rezp.ne as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form of said newspaper) once each issue for a period of t.liQ consecutive issues, commencing on the 7 day of F U1g ,19 ..76..., and ending the -14.. day of July ,19...76., both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its sub- scribers during all of said period. That the full amount of the fee charged for the foregoing publication is the sum of $..9.rag which has been paid in full at the rate of per folio of one hundred words for the first insertion and per folio of one hundred words for each subsequent insertion. C1 c lerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of Notary Public in and fbf the State of W ington, residing at Kent, Ki g County. — Passed by the Legislature, 1955, known as Senate Bill 281, effective June 9th, 1955. — Western Union Telegraph Co. rules for counting words and figures, adopted by the newspapers of the State. 13 July 1976 Sincerely, C Edgar D. Bauch, Mayor CITY or TUKWILA 6230 SOUTHCENTER BLVD. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98067 DEPARTMENT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Gary Crutchfield Assistant Planner GC /cw Encl: as Dear Property Owner: Please find attached a copy of a Public Notice informing you, as a nearby property owner, of a public hearing to be conducted at 8:00 P.M., Thursday, 22 July 1976, by the Tukwila Planning Commission to consider a request to rezone a parcel of property generally described in the .notice attached hereto from R -1 -7.2 to C -2. If granted, the rezone would allow commercial uses on this property rather than the current limitation of residential uses. If you have any comments concerning the proposed rezone you may voice them at the public hearing. If you are unable to attend the hearing, the Office of Community Development will accept written comments prior to the hearing and will enter them into the record. Should you desire any further information, please contact me at 242 -2177 at your convenience. CITY OF TUKWILA ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE This questionnaire must be completed by all persons applying for a permit from the city of Tukwila, unless it is determined by the Responsible Official that an environmental assessment or full impact statement is required. Other forms have been developed for single - family home applications and legislation proposals. BACKGROUND DATA: 1. Name of applicant: x —c A y ' 1 ,L uT (;,. S 2. Address and phone of Applicant: /3.903 /A/re. , fAegx1 S c2 3. Project name: S,145,c� 4. Project location: / � 9 e q / / ( r ? 2 J i 3 / / - u i l • Sa - J At/c.,a- , Vim( 5. Nature and brief description of proposal: t ` g - z okie Ce -I io 6. . Estimated completion date: " ' - 7. Do you - have any plans for future expansion, if yes please explain: 8. What other governmental permits are required prior to completion of this project? 0 - • (a) Rezone, conditional use, substantial development, etc. YES . NO (b) King County Hydr Permit YES- 5. NO (c) Building permit YESX .NO (d) Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Permit YES ? - NO (e) Sewer hook up permit YES X NO (f) Sign permit YES X. NO (g) Water hook up permit YES* NO (h) Storm water system permit YES . NO (i) Curb cut permit YES X 'NO (j) Electrical permit (State of Washington) YES x NO (k) Plumbing permit (King County) YES )( NO (1) Other 9. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: 10. Agency requiring checklist: City of Tukwila, Department - 1 A 11. Accepted by agency on: 22= cl • )q-76 by: (v , , (4/ , (to be filled in by city upon receip f checklist ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required.) Yes Maybe Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in any changes in geologic sub - structures: (b) Disruptions, displacements or overcovering of the soils: (d) The destruction, covering, or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? • (f) Changes in deposition or • erosion of beach sands, or in changes in siltation, deposition, or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed. of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: . Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? Air (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or in any change in climate, • either locally or regionally,? Explanation: (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? 7e Water. Will the proposal result in': (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the amount of surface water run- off? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any watercourse? (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sur- face.'water quality, including temperature or turbidity? (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an acquifer by cuts or excavations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seep- of•ieachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances .into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ( Yes Maybe No X Explanation: % L7 F 14 C; K i r"' F'/ t-'6 ?iQiC ,'' s ?i4'G C . f�oo i= C> f= ci / .. i &'G j J U ,6 - i 1 1* CC V ' 7 - ,' 1/1/4 / L,4 ✓E - 7Z7 #C 5/44)27-41.1' C Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change' in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, micro -flora and aquatic plants)? (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a bar- rier to the normal replenishment of . • existing species? u .Explanation: 0 Co &..r 7 y' i © c. , a° rJ It C-7 Co.vL • Fauna.' Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including rep - tiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects, or micro - fauna)? (b.) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of fauna? • (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing wildlife habitat? Explanation: Noise. Will the proposal increase exist ing noise levels? Explanation: Yes 'Maybe No Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Explanation: ' Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? Explanation: Explanation:.. Explanation: Explanation: Natural Resources. Will the proposal re- sult in: . • .(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resource? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable nat- ural resource? Risk of Upset.: Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . Yes ' Maybe two Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing availability, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: Transportation /Circulation. Will the pro- posal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and /or goods? (e) Alterations to waterborne or air traffic? Explanation: • C Local Service Will the'proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other 'governmental services? Explanation: Yes Maybe No • \. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new • sources of energy? Explanation: Utilities. Will'the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the follow- ing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? (b) .Communications systems? (c) Water ? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation; Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard.or potential . health hazard (excluding mental health)? Explanation: Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Explanation: Yes Maybe No Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of ex- isting recreational opportunities? Explanation: Archeological /Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site? Explanation: Revenue. Will the proposal cause cant.increase in city revenues? Explanation: D. &. e--7N L / ^' < Employment. Will the proposal create a. . significant amount of new jobs? Explanation: .DE 7- JD i/Lf a signifi- 0 d PE e/.4'T;S 0/L1 ----- / L1 /" fT S Yes 14aybe • No CE[tTIFICATION BY APPLICANT: • I hereby certify that the information furnished in this environmental checklist sheet is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Project Name: Project Address: Signature and Title • BELOW THIS LINE FOR CITY USE ONLY ACTION .BY OTHER' DEPARTMENTS: CITY OF TUKWILA mature and: itle • of Responsible Official June 24, 1975 1. Date of Review: Building .by: ( +) or ( -) Planning /S/E16 4.,7Ut1 by: (i. Cyt4A it+ .t'W ( +) or Engineering • by: • ( +) or (-) Police by: ( +) or ( -) Fire by: • ( +) or ( -) 2. Agency review of environmental checklist determined that: ' ':.The project is exempt by definition. Y The project has no significant environmental impact and application should be processed without further consideration of environmental affects The project has significant environmental impact and a complete environ -.:: mental impact statement must be prepared prior to further action for perm. More specific information is needed to determine impact. 'Check one 3. Applicant was notified of decision on: by by . Date Staff Person Letter, phone In accordance with Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila.. Ordinance No.•759. (•+•) Means recommend a full environmental impact statement be'done. (•-) . Means recommend a full environmental impact statement "not 'be 'done: • .. • City of Tukwila Resolution No. 489 Interim Land Use Council Directive: "` August 18, 1975 Notice to Applicants for a Rezone, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Actions with significant negative environmental impacts, or development in areas of natural hazards. Summary: Resolution No. 489 of the City of Tukwila directs that no applications for a rezone or comprehensive plan amendment shall be accepted or processed by the City until a new Land Use Policy Plan is completed and adopted. This also applies to certain actions which are precedent setting, have signi- ficant negative environmental effects or in areas of natural limitations. Section 4 of the attached resolution specifies which actions are affected. Duration: This resolution will be effective until the first regular council meeting in July, 1976, after which the City Council will consider the extension or repeal of its provisions. Should a new comprehensive plan be adopted prior.to this date, the resolution will automatically be void. Waiver: Provisions are included in Section 5 of the resolution for an .applicant to request a waiver upon the showing of facts and other evidence as specified in forms available from the City. Procedure: Attached is an application form to request a waiver of the provisions of this resolution. The City Council will review your request pursuant to Section 5 of Resolution No. 489. Prior to being presented to the City Council, the Planning Department will prepare a staff report with a recommendation based on an analysis of the following type of criteria: 1. Is the proposed action consistent with the presently emerging Land Use Policy Plan? 2. Does the proposed action represent a unique condition which is insignificant in scale and to which no other apparent alternatives are reasonable? 3. If the request for waiverinvolvesgrading, excavation, filling or development in geographical areas identified as having potential natural limitations for development, are mitigating measures provided? 4. Do the requirements contained in Resolution No. 489 impose a special hardship to a site for which a waiver of the provisions would not necessitate a major.po1icy committment prior to the adoption of the Land Use.Policy Plan? /SUBSTITUTE , RESOLUTION NO. !/ :'' A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Tukwila acknowledging that the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Ttg wila no longer reflects currently held values of the community in regard to planning and land use development; recognizing the necessity of establishing a new land use policy plan or comprehensive plan; and declaring a proposed interim policy. WHEREAS, the comprehensive plan still in existence for the City of Tukwila was adopted prior to the enactment of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act and City of Tukwila Ordinance Do. 759 relating to environmental policy, and; WHL•'REA.S, it is clear that the comprehensive plan for the City of Tukwila no longer entirely reflects currently held values of the community, its legislative body or the currently recognized state of the art of planning and community development, and; WHEREAS, it is necessary, as well as required, by the State Environmental Policy Act to review the land use plans and planning processes of the City of Tukwila to assure that the land use plan, its goals and policies are consistent with the mandate of the Environmental Policy Act and the currently held values of the total community; HOST, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Tukwila City Council as follows: Section 1: The City Council finds that the present comprehensive plan which indicates public land use policy is no longer adequate to provide guidance for future decision making and land use management. Section 2: The City Council further finds that such plan is not related to clearly established goals and objectives for community development, nor is there • present consensus or understanding about the consequences of development actions based on such plan. Section 3: The City Council directs that all segments of the city, includ— ing the City Council, its advisory bodies and the administration work together toward the identification and establishment of goals and policies consistent with the environ- mental mandate contained in the Environmental Policy Act, and with the currently held values of the community in order that a new land use plan may be prepared and adopted for the City of Tukwila. Section q: The City Council further declares that until such time as a new land use policy plan can be prepared and adopted, the following actions are found to be those which current land use plans do not adequately address with standards and. criteria. There is not sufficient understanding and consensus of the consequences of such actions upon present community values and future goals and resources. Therefore, the City Council directs that no application requesting any of the following actions shall be accepted or processed by the City unt81 completion and adoption of a new land use policy plait: A. Any rezone application, except a rezone from one single family residential classification to another single family residential classification. B. Comprehensive Land'Use Plan amendments. C. Those lend use actions which, subsequent to the preparation of an Environmental Assessment or Environmental Impact Statement pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act are found by the City Council to: 1. setting. 2. Contain significant environmental impacts which will not be mitigated. • Section 5: Any proponent sponsor for an action identified in Section 4 above may appeal the provisions of this policy to the City Council and present evidence or other materials or findings to request a waiver of the provisions of this policy. Upon appeal, the city Planning Department shall recommend, and the City Council shall decide whether to permit an application to be filed and processed with the appropriate city department or departments. The City Council will at such time consider only the question of whether or not there should be a waiver of the policy herein adopted. Such action by the City Council shall in no tray prejudge the substantive merits of the proposed action. If it is determined necessary or advisable, the City Council may . conduct a public hearing prior to reaching a decision on any waiver. request as to the provisions of this resolution. Notice for a public hearing shall be given at the applicant's expense in a manner prescribed by Chapter 18.92 of the Tukwila Municipal Code, Ordinance 251, as amended. / 6: The City Clerk is directed to file a copy of the resolution with every department and advisory or administrative board for the City of Tukwila. Section 7: This resolution and the policy herein adopted shall be brought . before the City Council for its review and reconsideration at the first regular council maetino in July, 1976. Section 8: This resolution becomes effective thirty (30) days after passage Any application for a building permit on file with the City 30 days subsequent to passage.of this resolution is exempt from the provisions of this policy. meeting thereof, this... PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TIIKW"ILA, , UASHINGTON, at a regular ' . day of ' ' (Gl /,i2..t ' 1975•. C { 1). 1 ?roposa_j for ,waling, clearing, e-ca p ion or filling which are: 1. Located in an area with average slopes in excess of 25;4. 2. Located in a geographical area identified by governmental or quasi - governmental agencies as having: 3. Served by inadequate Crater, sewer, storm drainage or trans- portation systems unless such action proposes the improve - - ment of any deficient system to minimum city standards and at the expense of the private sponsor. (a) Naturally unstable, unstable when modified, Or in areas of known landslides. (b) Areas which serve to naturally detain significant amounts of storm Crater run -off. - 2 - Mayor Date Approved (Not approved by the Mayor.) • fi f EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION FOR BURTON LUTES: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 11, BLOCK 3, AND LOT 10, BLOCK 8, ALL IN HILLMAN'S SEATTLE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF-KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, VACATED 57TH AVENUE SOUTH, VACATED SOUTH 139TH STREET, THE STEVEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38 AND THE JOSEPH FOSTER DONATION, LAND CLAIM NO. 39 IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH,r RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, SAID BLOCK 3 WHICH IS SOUTH 89 °00'12" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 33 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 °00'l2" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 145.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF 57TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 1 °08'48" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 101.99 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH— WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH EASTERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 8.; THENCE NORTH 46 °18'48" EAST ALONG SAID EXTENSION AND NORTHWESTERLY LINE 181.66 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE (STATE HIGHWAY 5—M); THENCE NORTH 43 °41'12" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 43 °41'12" WEST 220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 °18'48" WEST 234.22 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 20 °48'02'.' WEST FROM THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 20 °48'02" EAST 238.80 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46 °18'48" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 46 °18'48" EAST 327.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BE— GINNING. f • BUSH, vED & HITCHINGS, P. S., Inc. • JOB 1942C 3/31/76 ALH r'�+ y • ?J4 :".r;'; ;, ...: < , ' t 4w •' •7 • �T ' V „ e • e 44 I P 1 1 0 4— cf 1 . 9 It-F:000m 4 or t"t7frir 4 02 7V.70 • . (A IC "9/ ... IV • 0.r.-1 n., ▪ '... r—le .?•!/ , ... ..) .,i LSP.1 Illi ‘q .... v, 4 -- , be7F/")0Yr" N 7P ,r/-7777.2yr., NO. ti - •c, a •to r. 4 IV 2 r itliEl "" I L - I. , 71 92 ' pi lyer i• el ze 7 4 ,., ▪ :0/ ii,e7yr .4 • .ov 1NO.Lb' . 11>: // . c Qi c C.\ 11 p. • P/117.2 ' 0 ••• /•7:1 Oltt, I. 1.47 rl c.. ' .1s 3. IL J • - (gYc/ cm/0**RO'; 1 looctoald IMMO. 4001E00 0E0 ZZ 44 90•Zral • 471 01 • ..•••■••••••• • •• Imumo•••••••••■••••■••••••••••■••••• •••■••■••••••• • 9; Si • IC • • • • • I?. t • • • • • • • ---.- • • • • • • • • • • • • • " • *Jr./ 4011• • 0 ••••• I 0;191 I I_ 6 , 0 . cr. If I -.0 - L ./. 57,fr/ 0.72! ..... .... .2 .2 V 4 90 0,7' 92C111 c, 0,77170 7 4 •21 ...a :l .i /s e • • . 9 V 'I 9NISMOQ C0 '7:i .1 CI I011•; 7.1.70dr Cs ---••5: - I , ti .-‘ •I ;" ; 1 I 1 7rer p :7/t*:.- ... — .. f.... : J , D ,* ; . 1..., P• ,•- ZI I c; c....... , x .. • J Y;.,:, 11,1 00 ..•• .00•••■••••■• I"" • P gdO is- • R ; 01 • 4 • 11 L vf ▪ e • a. • • • ••••.; • i • L • I. < •• .r. 1 ..----.. .. I •••••,,. ,. . i 0• .1. 10: I i • : ...,0:-.•.•. •::,'• . ...,.00.0, 0.10.1••••• 0.06 s...m.•••■•• 0....... 0 • t• S CO% I i 7 ..."... %. ..„ 3.__,,-__t, • SI '1:1 • t.• . • 1 PI g2C./1 ,•••••,-.,. ,..--; 1 olr , --. l ' te1_,...: • '-' 5 1 wit _•t • i r _.-:,.. : ....N : L. . 1 i... ...,/ 1 ' I /7' :•---• I .7 1 277 I A _,_ 79 , ,V . : , .' 2.A oi! ■ _.....iy: I i 1. sr ':. , s.:„... , , v2s..: : - ...... „ - . .• - N 1 I • t. •";) I i 1 1/4•• - , .... .....• ,............... \ % ; %.3:i 71 7 aic • -, zf ,,,,,,,-,- - /- 1 - ._,._." ".5. ii.WJA i - • — - .-- - - .■ - •IVQ1.10W0 0 '•...v !.: . • ■ \I:Z., . n • r , g l ii' 1 SSe.S r - \ • \ ti•-- 1 ...f.?.. \ \ •,--; '9V I L 0 )V 95'0 \ • \ J: ;../ s w-:::■ \ k\ •!, N, • • I • . \ ••,-• wrkl 4.• ./ • \ . • 6, .1 •:. ( \ \ Q'1 \ \ \ i roc ■ -.-- 77 .4 /1 <J // 9 1 .3 \ ySQU L IfJe 10_ ptlF1J1 F„Q,f n•• 0ONATIdAb -C c•. 1 ,...:-,./.',/ .Sd °: I 1 ! 9 �. v ✓roc 7Lz✓ \ /Z° � _ J= _ " /71 us - T ._... ,•c5" ! 1 • - /:ri 1D <•:4;f i �� • 1 64.5 I L4 — ' ! J J: ; 3:70 1 - :.••• • • 1:,11 12 • i !l. 2!S 3 13 - - — )7 • ', 1 1 025 0 I ;40 1• 74: Y L 1 r ^ .1�— ItiO3 3 'J \ '2. \ \ 7 OSC 40 NE4 13905 JFDC I I� Ir /4F e ✓ . . 7C.J 13: ." .. � Ij017 ;<'. T7 u FO.C. T..1.4 TR0 • /60 /5 e y J.F l , w 1 3335%, JFUC. I' 0 13: ;1 !7 .I jF.O.C. 0112 LUTES B B =..ti•:. 0 1 � � � /02 ,� I Q(HiCSO'LANO IIR) S • /42ND ST 141 :401 ST 1 OPI3 ;CI n 'J . .. . -. .... -.... .. �- �'' 14" g 1 2 - ) " — � 1 1135 Q ` 1 _. M._.... - -. �. —a.. IJ2 .....::1. t .. " B - - 13 a. Lr) c,i I In _..__ =‘�_. -.-- -- I q 7 ._14 I I c"• 6115 rm,,, mo N 10 11 .zi:e 1 1 •. ` ' ��e C. \ • JFDCTL 19 '•� ✓rne.TLf7 13 ✓FOC 71.29 ALBERT E. DOWSING ` I.t A c. , �^ ✓FD.{ 7 L 26 ✓F,U ,JF.O.C.ZL.2D �- Q �7L /0 D26 0.68 Ac. • 32 ^2 S MCAIEO i4I �+ v :410 16 11 31 _Lai. 6 30 141 14 17 13 20 • �22 14'ob 1 • CO UR S.F, 'L 49 e • 26 tit r•l• Cif, burr, J COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN CIITY 4Y P ; Utl� ►:, LEGEND r.: I NDUSTRIAL RETAIL SALES • MULTIPLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY PUBLIC O-v-a,r1fuo PASSED BY ORDINANCE 484 15 NAY 1967 • 1e /4 \ Th'/1/ • „ 90 3111111111111R> lE ✓file r / /7/ OS /6472 13905 JFO , � y �_•• JF.vC 16.8 13 17 C31 „Jruc.rr Jl. (pc?, 13 QQ`� -\ " /30/7 • 3i. 13J = ,J,ac. . �, 1 39Z5 JF.OGT.L J 4 83 .D 205 83 JFDCTL I3 �J.F:OC. T.L. /.7 j ✓.f.O.f. 7. L.3C''� C. T. •j u F OC.7 / "' /60/5 4.1e. G t.J.F0.C. ,8 ,13935 `'`, /678 0. JFOC.I.l /- 0 13'}x/ z f,w V ` � STER *NA �?• ? o i 0' R 11 ae.. i \ 3� // 0/1.3 1 t LUTES B. BURTON 1.51 Ac. ti 3•f.O C. /// 37 14117 e' , �Q 1 e 31 �.r L ni r • .3 • • • . F. D C. , O.56Ac. r I I'4ve, 1 3742 c,.744 J/8, " " ?G0 I P II 1 °: 1 112 Q 3 os4 � / /.y ` •%......-•;;•,,, - . t J: 1004: Lc: CO 4 • • T • • 4 ' • 7 / { C' • ♦ F n DO /&N- � � ' .11 '06 it eo 4 — x033 '": !403 ''/2 4 1 L "NOT � 1 �* 1J 11 .,F 9 1 , 12 i 2 21; B 1 13 1 0. • 7 • • 4 101 • • • • • • i • • • • • • 32 40 • F. 0.C. B \ T.L. JlOf 7L. 83 1 ALBERT E. DOWSING_ I.r A c. 13 ✓ FO.0 7 l e6 ✓fo.f. J.F.0.C.7.L.28 7L /0 ✓ la 26 0.68 Ac. 0 , • _2s_ 10 VACATED i4JS r 14: ;1; 16 1 11 i }I� 1 DO - 1411u 9 1 1 t ' I 1 3 El. 6 15 r , q 0 4\� 0 1 v � 4• s ail /763 N Jf.O.C. ll2 � • 4 - /LL 47 .1 . ti L0 S1 /9k 141 0 141 15 14 13 •j0 18 12 19 1B06 V -1 L COURSE 11 *AND OR) S -' r /42ND / >I , 1 cJ �l , C1 I E .- _.... 10 ..._ _. `ll .5: F. D. C. 4 7L49 ' I4o, 27 • ST sa •�s • •••■ u / Z4 t lY k• 4,° ° .1 • in IA • / : • t - • s , t4 6 ; • tf .... 4 , . 17 j16 5 18 1r17 i 12 ' 19 1 i El ... lir 41 . 10 4 , e SN/ f 7 06 i n ,r;.- 4113' S 23 215 ..... 7 1 24 1 iiri 6 25 j 46 S 26 I TO 1424s L 4 27 18111 1 -‘ _____....____.. I 1 4 -----.. .!!'.1.}. --.- ' -* - • --- 1 1 '..- 3 s...—...— 2 28 LLI 1 re.; 29 11 1 ci • .. 12 1 C7 6,5 ....,....--.- . . - '‘I';, 7:::.::;:!:.',.,;:7•.,:-', ,,,:-.:11.:!.,;(7-;!':„.','-'--,`',11;,.',....P•',....." ';' i . , ‘, , ...,:'•:-.':',,,:=: - 7,;;;' , . ' ":••• :' .•:.;`:,:-.;,':',--7:.--,4f7:4:.•:•,,.. ... ...I , .). • 12'el i ." r-r• ' -:- • - -::,:',...;....•';'-...,::':.'..-...• • - ,..... ...... g . ( • . -... .......,........_:._ \ <-: - 4 \ . \ \.\ ( .., ' .. ..0 . , , f.1.,.;,_,..„.. • I' c , ,_p _ -• --- \ ti-- ,%- • - • , ; z."), : . . .!-, .5,17C „ T. 1_l " Ar ICLAW / 1 I I 5 B BURTON, 1.5 I AG. Jr D.C. IL.3 °,c 4 /4. P , /4: ti • to• 4.?0 /:* • 1. roe. It 2 D A /to /.5 J C It <1 J 0.0 T c‘Al., 13935 • 1 OC. Tr V O y.13, Ll 7.3 ty 13 ■;;:- ..i.r o '''' •,...LL7,9.4 ; -LA 'DS 71 26 s 143 ./44.L.494.3 a rDC 0I.O.0 IL 48 ,IL.LI,L rt 10 G. 0.68 Ac. 4(1 - /16 VoICATE0 /4/S T STER 30 SI 0C 5 1 7 1 1 8;91 10 111121 1. 1 1 1 ' 1 c 1: 14217 .19 Ti 6 (NaLMAN 1 4 16 ST I / 6L( 171 ‘z 1 5' REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE . 7 - "" OR PART FOR PERSONAL USE OR COUNTY TAX LOT NO, RESALE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW. • I I (r ) 1 32 QCIiWAMO DR) /42ND • 42 - 10 Z 1Z 1421 -■A " 92 1 iGa • ; 13216 8 13 14222 [-p • VI 6- 17 133Z .j IS Cal 5 77,:s 4 1 17 LJ 3 18 .; -- I 2 1 19 27 20 n• r C11 ,...' ST 1 • • • S' ' 4.1 /4.1,3 - 16 • Jo . REID 8 . /3 • 54 9 \ \ \\ \\\ \ \�: \ \ S. S. \ l \\ • \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ P� \. 0 x 19. 0 x O x , . X24.5 � CD 0 L• I • 144TH Paved Paved x 9/.5 76.0x Paved Greer , , 1; 20.5 x D OVERLAP SEC. 0K008 R.1" RECEIPT Date 976 5 :332. Received. From %`r n( ,e;A Address `, -gam _1,,c,....r,,,..67c.- _ &cam 4 / V` c.-vv L____. • ars For 62� ,en-2 0. ACCOUNT HOW PAID / G/ > AMT OF ACCOUNT CASH ' pp AMT. PAID CHECK .. BALANCE DUE •• • MONEY ORDER Py J 0K008 R.1" DESCRIPTION FOR BURTON LUTES: BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, P. S., Inc. THAT PORTION OF LOTS 5 THROUGH‘11, BLOCK 3, AND LOT 10, BLOCK 8, ALL IN HILLMAN'S SEATTLE GARDEN TRACTS, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 24, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, VACATED 57TH AVENUE SOUTH, VACATED SOUTH 139TH STREET, THE STEVEN FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 38 AND THE JOSEPH FOSTER DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 39 IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 4, SAID BLOCK 3 WHICH IS SOUTH 89 °00'12" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 33 FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 °00'12" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE 145.13 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF 57TH AVENUE SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 1 °08'48" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE 101.99 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH- WESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH EASTERLY 50 FEET OF LOT 10, SAID BLOCK 8 THENCE NORTH 46 °18'48" EAST ALONG SAID EXTENSION AND NORTHWESTERLY. LINE 181.66 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF INTERURBAN AVENUE (STATE HIGHWAY 5 -M); THENCE NORTH 43 ° 41'12" WEST ALONG SAID LINE 100 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH, 43 °41'12" WEST 220.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46 °18'48" WEST 234.22 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 20 ° 48'02 "WEST FROM THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT; THENCE SOUTH 20 °48'02" EAST 238.80 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 46 °18'48" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 46 °18'48" EAST 327.09 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BE- GINNING. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF LAND USE CLASSIFICATION OR MODIFICATION OF LAND USE RDGULATIONS IN THE CITY OF ZUKWILA FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Appl. No. Planning Camnission Action Receipt No. Filing Date City Council Action Hearing Date Ordinance No. & Date APPLICANT TO ANSWER ALL THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS NEATLY AND ACCURATELY: Name BUR 1- L r eE'S Address rj o /, 'v ,e i9 So . I L/4 + 1A// S I-+ . Telephone No. 24 3 3 oR /• Property Petitioned for rezoning is located on t/T� e v e i'3r4 - A ✓E s o. between 30 / � / and 1t'%,4 . Total square footage in property 9/ / 7 G, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY / 4 7 - Existing Zoning / f ? C'- z Zoning requested What are the uses you propose to. develop on this property? o,2- / s, IE-s _ S / C -:2 ? C of permanent off - street parking spaces that will be provided on property? o L /� �= ,C� MA 4 1 • - required . NOTICE TO APPLICANT: The fo owing factors are considered in reclassifying property or modifying regulations. Evidence or additional information you desire to submit to substantiate your request may be attached to this sheet. '.(See Application Procedure sheet Item No. 2 for specific minimum requirements.) 1. What provisions will be made to screen adjacent'and surrounding property from any incompatible effects which may arise as a result of the proposed land use classification? 4-4/ ^ ` /n// /l� 67 �erY J// _. 5 /J--ac; . 7'5 • y (Gz.u►(ye-N // 4/i j • 0 U J L L ) 4. Any other comments which the petitioner feels are appropriate: . Form B /o Vi c= Soc._L 2. What provisions will be madeoto provide for necessary street widening to City minim standards? l c r/ L D/ i./l s WILL- S e T 4c / S ci , p'i C/ c/4/ 7 7- Ig J/ifo / /ll�i 3. What provisions will be made for adequate sewer and water service? /ifs '��.,.:6? _... Lute21 eiusToi•I Keloki5 MF tscs imaxsAN Isiv 0717 ,iff5V-7■-7•7 7 i TM g — r4s'TFC4SYeg';',A0. Ttc, 4 • 42 ,7117.4r M1 IIIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIII 111111 1 111 I I W I I 11 I I I II I I IIIIIII [ III 1111111 I ri ik O SThIINCU 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FLEXIBLE RULER -302 AW 111110.0 •.! 16X rpr AF THIS MICROFILMED DOCUMENT IS LESS 'CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE, IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT : 1,2iattis •