Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L01-051 - OPUS NORTHWEST - DESIGN REVIEW
LO1-051 OPUS PARK 5/405 1491O51STAVS (DR) DESIGN REVIEW wesi OPUS PARK I-5/1-405 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF 'TUKWILA Prepared for OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915-118 Ave. S.E., Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 February 22, 2001 cm r,4"ElvE() opruxiiviu JUL 1 9 2001 PER kurcENTp il Transportation Planning ... & E n gineerin : 2223 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, Washington 98004-2952 Telephone: (425) 455-5320 Facsimile: (425) 453-5759 OPUS PARK 1 -5/1 -405 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TUKWILA Prepared for OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 =118 Ave. S.E., Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2223 - 112 Ave. N.E., Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98005 Telephone: (425) 455 -5320 Fax: (425) 453 -5759 http: / /www.tranplanenq.com February 22, 2001 .4klu±ir,LS.ar;1}S'ir.�.•� S�:i;itL.t�+�J%fLt`.:' :^ l� '?<F'Y n , L7 . . u�:3 /rx • APE VICTOR H. BISHOP, P.E. President DAVID H. ENGER, P.E. Vico President Andy Taber, Senior Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 -118 Ave. S.E., Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Opus Park 1 -5/1 -405 — Tukwila Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Taber: TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. ♦ 51 Ave. S. /S. 144 St. ♦ 51 Ave. S. /S. 151 St. ♦ 51 Ave. S. /SR 518 westbound ramp ♦ 51 Ave. S. /SR 518 eastbound ramp • Klickitat Dr. /SR 5 SB on -ramp O 52 Ave. S. /S. 154 St. ♦ SR 5 southbound off - ramp /S. 154 St. ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /SR 405 SB off -ramp ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /Macadam Rd. S. ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /61S Ave. S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2223 - 112' AVENUE N.E., SUITE 101 - BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 -2952 TELEPHONE (425) 455-5320 FACSIMILE (425) 453 -5759 February 22, 2001 We are pleased to submit this traffic impact analysis for the proposed Opus Park 1 -5/1 -405 office project in the northeast corner of the 51 Ave. S. /S.151 St. intersection in the City of Tukwila. This project consists of two office buildings, Building A and Building B. 5uilding_ A would be three stories providing around_43,200 sq. ft. of office.space in the top two floors and about 21,600 sq. ft. of high tech assembly space on the ground floor. The second building, Building B, would provide around 37,000 sq. ft. of office space in two floors. We have visited the project site and surrounding street network, and have discussed the scope of this study with the City of Tukwila staff. Based on our conversations and e-mail correspondence with the City of Tukwila staff and our traffic engineering experience, the following intersections have been identified for analysis: The summary, conclusions and recommendations begin on page 8 of this report. Figure 1 is a vicinity map showing the location of the site and the surrounding street network. Figure 2 shows a preliminary site plan prepared by Sconzo Hallstrom Architects. The plan consists of a three -story 64,800 sq. ft. building, Building A, a two -story 37,000 sq. ft. C:1- Pro /ectsIT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601T!A.doc F Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 2 building, Building B, parking for 337 vehicles, including eight handicap, and four driveways. Building A is located in the northern portion of the site and Building B in the south. A wetland segregates the two buildings from one another and thus no internal vehicular circulation is provided between the buildings. Full development of the Opus Park 1 -5/1 -405 is expected to occur by 2002/2003, pending timely permit approval. However, to ensure a conservative analysis, a horizon year of 2006 is used for this study. EXISTING PHYSICAL CONDITIONS The project site presently is developed with 10 single - family dwelling units. These units would be removed from the site to make way for the subject project. Street Facilities Figure 3 shows existing traffic control, number of street lanes, number of approach lanes at intersections, and other pertinent information near the project site. The primary streets in the study area and their classifications are as follows: ♦ SR 5 Freeway ♦ SR 405 Freeway ♦ SR 518 Freeway ♦ SR 99 Principal Arterial ♦ Southcenter Blvd. Principal Arterial ♦ Southcenter Pkwy. Minor Arterial ♦ 51 Ave. S. Minor Arterial ♦ S. 154 St. Minor Arterial ♦ S. 144` St. Collector Arterial • Klickitat Drive Collector Arterial ♦ Macadam Rd. S. Collector Arterial • 53 Ave. S. Unclassified Local Access ♦ S. 156 St. Unclassified Local Access • 52 Ave. S. Unclassified Local Access Pedestrian Facilities Paved shoulders exist on 51s Ave. S. in the site vicinity. No pedestrian facility currently exists on S. 151 Street. Note: The development of Building `B" of the subject project would, in conjunction with frontage improvements, provide a pedestrian sidewalk. C:1- Projecls1T PROJECTSIT0846011T084601 T1A.doc TpE Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 3 Transit Facilities Metro Transit provides transit service in the King County Region. The Metro Transit System Map, February 1999 identifies one bus route, route 128 in the site vicinity. This route serves S. 144 St. about seven blocks north of the proposed project. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Based on discussion with the City of Tukwila staff and our traffic engineering experience, the following intersections were identified for analysis: • 51 Ave. S. /S. 144` St. ♦ 51s Ave. S. /S. 151s St. ♦ 51s Ave. S. /SR 518 westbound ramp ♦ 51s Ave. S. /SR 518 eastbound ramp ♦ Klickitat Dr. /SR 5 SB on -ramp • 52 Ave. S. /S. 154 St. ♦ SR 5 southbound off - ramp /S. 154 St. ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /SR 405 SB off -ramp ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /Macadam Rd. S. ♦ Southcenter Blvd. /61s Ave. S. Figure 4 shows existing PM peak hour traffic volumes at these intersections. Traffic turning movement volume counts for the intersections were conducted by Trafficount Consultants, Inc., a firm specializing in the collection of traffic data. Copies of the turning movement counts are included in the appendix. The turning movement counts were conducted in January 2001. Southcenter, a large regional shopping mall influences traffic volumes in the area. Traffic data collected by the City at their control count locations by month and year provides insight into traffic volume variation throughout the year. Review of the City's traffic data indicates that the monthly variation at both Klickitat Drive west of 53 Ave. S. and Southcenter Blvd. west of the S -line shows a moderation in seasonal variation in recent years. The traffic volume variation from the average month in 1998 was nine and four percent at the Klickitat Drive and Southcenter Blvd. control locations, respectively. Figure 5 shows the adjusted traffic volumes to better reflect average traffic conditions. The collected, January data, traffic volumes were increased by a factor of 10 percent. We believe that 10 percent is a reasonable approach. The 10 percent increase is likely conservative based on existing traffic volume trends at the City control location reviewed. C:1- ProjeclslT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601 TIA.doc TpE =.tR ;Tye��. X�.ro,•t�ca. -rtn!Rh �7x:t`f.Y,�:i'!?:'�q z _�- z cG w 6 J U U00 LLI J D LL w o 2 u. cn = w z �. � z t- w • w U 0 (-2 oI-- wW _ U O Id Z U o~ z TYPE OF INTERSECTION A B C D E F Signalized < 10 > 10 and < 20 >20 and < 35 > 35 and < 55 > 55 and < 80 >80 Stop Sign Control < 10 > 10 and < 15 >15 and < 25 > 25 and < 35 > 35 and < 50 >50 Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 4 Level of Service Analysis Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic flow, and the perception of these conditions by drivers or passengers. These conditions include factors such as speed, delay, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience, and safety. Levels of service are given letter designations, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions (free flow, little delay) and LOS F the worst (congestion, long delays). Generally, LOS A and B are high, LOS C and D are moderate, and LOS E and F are low. Table 1 shows calculated levels of service (LOS) for existing conditions at the pertinent street intersections. The LOS were calculated using the procedures in the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, 3rd Edition updated December 1997. The LOS and corresponding average delay in seconds are as follows: The analysis at the SR 405 southbound off - ramp /Southcenter Blvd. indicated worse LOS than observed. A field delay study during the PM peak period for the northbound to westbound motorists showed the average delay to be about 28 seconds, with occasionally delays up to 70 to 80 seconds. Many motorists arrived, stopped at the stop sign and proceeded to turn left in a very short time period. Other motorists arrived at a time where significant eastbound traffic was present. These motorists, on occasion, had to wait for a minute or so with other motorists sometimes queuing behind them. The maximum queue observed was six vehicles. The calculated LOS using the volumes shown in Figure 4 resulted in average delay of 62 seconds, double the time observed. Significant gaps exist in the eastbound traffic stream due to the operation of the signal at the SR 5 southbound off - ramp /S. 154` St. intersection. Adjustment to the upstream signal data inputs were done to better reflect field observed gapping. The data was adjusted until the resultant LOS and delay matched the recorded field data. We believe that this approach provides a better reflection of the intersection operation. C:1- ProjecfslT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601 TIA.doc �pE hrr ; {'h'!2f0'S'. ^.;1'w6?.rh "w.e:. rho; K.' 4c... r....: xs:! 4',:^.F:ia;'Y'r';<.cTd?,LX7'.., Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 5 z Accident History m w Traffic accident data was requested from the City. The City provided three corridor cc reports. These reports are: o 0 • S. 144 St. between 51 Ave. S. and S. 160` St., 01.01.96- 12.31.00 CO i • Southcenter Parkway between Klickitat Dr. and S. 154 St., 01.01.96 to 12.30.00 co O tu ♦ S. 154 St. between 51s' Ave. S. and Macadam Rd. S., 01.01.96 to 12.30.00 • Southcenter Blvd. Between 51 Ave. S. and Macadam Rd. S., 01.01.96 to g 12.31.00 0 = I- III General review of the City's data, attached, does not reveal any unusual patterns. The z '- signalized Southcenter Parkway /Klickitat Dr. and Southcenter Blvd. /Macadam Rd. incur a higher z O number of incidents which is typical at higher volume intersections. The bulk of the incidents at in these signalized intersections were of the rear end type. Rear end incidents tend to be 2 o associated with queues formed during red phases of the signal cycle. o cn a '- FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITHOUT THE PROJECT = w Figure 6 shows projected 2006 PM peak hour traffic volumes without the project. These z volumes include the existing traffic volume counts plus background growth. The growth factor w used in this report is two percent per year. This factor was determined by comparing yearly • z traffic data from the City's control count locations. 0 ~ z PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS City of Tukwila The City of Tukwila's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 2001 -2006 adopted 06.05.00 identifies one street improvement project in the vicinity of the subject site. The project is S. 144` St. from Pacific Hwy. to Military Road. This project is priority 28 of 29 projects and comprises designing and constructing widening including paving. The project is scheduled for engineering in early 2006 and is budgeted at $35,000.00. In addition to the six year TIP projects, the City of Tukwila has identified a number of street improvements in their Transportation Element December 1993. Table 12 Mitigation Proportionate Fair Share Costs, contained in the Transportation Element identifies the street improvements. A copy of this table is in the appendix to this report. The TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS section of this report further details these street improvement projects. C:1- ProjecIslT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601 TIA.doc 4PE x•�. �7;a sLrNvr ..aa.�.ckt�;i.�':31i�.�!w +� Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 6 z WSDOT Z 111 re 2 either SR 5 or SR 405 in the immediate vicinity of the project site. - o 0) 0 w= J E- Definitions Lu 0 w A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the g origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. "- a Traffic generated by development projects consists of the following types: = w 1- z � O Z ~ Diverted Linked Trips: Trips attracted from the traffic volume on roadways within n 0 . o the vicinity of the generator but require a diversion from 0 that roadway to another roadway to gain access to the site. w ' — I- 0 w z F. _ 0 The WSDOT's Sunshine Report, dated 02.12.01, does not indicate improvements on TRIP GENERATION Pass -By Trips: Trips made as intermediate stops on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Captured Trips: Primary Trips: Project Generated Traffic Existing Traffic Trips shared by more than one land use on a single development site. Trips made for the specific purpose of using the services of the project. Table 2 shows the vehicular trips during an average weekday and during the AM and PM street traffic peak hours for the proposed office building project. The trip generation values are calculated using the average trip rates in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, Sixth Edition, 1997 for Light Industrial and General Office Building (ITE Land Use Codes 110 and 710, respectively). trip generation values account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, and service and delivery vehicle trips. The project site is currently developed with 10 single - family detached housing units. These units would be removed from the subject site. Residents of these homes generate traffic. Table 2 shows the traffic generated by the residents based on the trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation for ITE land use code 210, Single Family Detached Housing. C:1- ProJeclslT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601TIA.doc TpE z z Net New Traffic ce w follows: -3 O 00 (J) Co J 1-- ?w w o L Figure 7 shows the calculated site - generated trip distribution and assignment. The = w distribution is based on the characteristics of the street network, existing traffic volume patterns, H t he location of likely trips, origins and destinations (residential, shopping, social and recreational z opportunities). Z o FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT U O� 0 F- wW Figure 8 shows the projected 2006 PM peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed project. The site - generated average daily and PM peak hour traffic volumes shown on Figure 6 z were added to the projected background traffic volumes shown on Figure 5 to obtain the Figure j 7 volumes. F. I Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 7 The net new traffic that is projected to be generated by the project is calculated to be as Average Weekday AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour TRIP DISTRIBUTION Traffic Volumes 938 trips 137 trips 130 trips The calculated LOS for future "without" and "with" the project conditions indicate that the 52 " Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection would operate at LOS F. The City may request that improvements at this intersection be made. The following provides a brief synopsis of an enhancement that would improve the operation of the 52n Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection. Our analysis indicates that improvements to the existing channelization could improve the LOS operations of the 52 Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection. The improvements would provide a short southbound to westbound right turn pocket on 52 " Ave. S. and a left turn refuge lane on S. 154 St. to facilitate the southbound to eastbound left turn movements. Providing these improvements would likely entail some modest pavement widening. Conceptual sketches of the existing and proposed channelization are included in the appendix of this report. The above improvement is needed "without" or "with" the project to improve the LOS at the intersection. The proposed Opus Park 1 -5/1 -405 projects proportionate share impact at the S. 154 St. /52n Ave. S. intersection is as follows: S. 154 St. /52n Ave. S. 4PE C:1- Projecls %T PROJECTSIT0846011T084601 TIA.doc f- : - Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 8 73 PM peak project trips 1,628 total PM peak trips Subsequent to the above analysis, we received and reviewed a copy of 52 Ave. S. Office Building Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by the Urban Regional Research Planning Consultants dated March 25, 1999. This report was prepared for a 22,162 gross square foot two -story office building to be located at 15208 - 52 " Ave. South. The report included an analysis of the impact of buildout of nine nearby parcels at the 52 " Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection. Their analysis concluded that improvements to the 52 " Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection would be required with buildout of these nearby parcels. The recommended improvements were to widen S. 154 St. to provide an eastbound left turn lane and an eastbound refuge /acceleration lane. These improvements are similar to those proposed in our analysis. We believe that our proposed improvements to rechannelize the intersection utilizing existing pavement with modest widening would be more practical. Our improvements also recommended the installation of a southbound right turn pocket on 52 "d Ave. South. The 52 " Ave. S. /S. 154 St. intersection does not appear to be identified by the City for improvements. We would recommend that the applicant work with the City of Tukwila staff and nearby developers regarding adding this intersection to their street improvement program. We recommend that the improvements identified in this report to be appropriate. TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS 4.5% The City is currently collecting pro -rata share contributions for eleven street improvement projects on their six -year transportation improvement program. Fee rates have been developed for each of the eleven projects. The rates are based on the street traffic noon peak hour. Attached is a copy of a fax transmittal from the City dated 05.22.97 including a copy of Table 12 — Mitigation Proportionate Fairshare Costs from the Transportation Element of the City's comprehensive plan. The City's Table 12 shows the derivation of the fee rates, including a rate change and two projects which have been added to the list in handwritten form. Table 3 shows the net new noon peak hour project trips, fee rate and pro -rata share contribution at each location for the proposed Opus Business Park 1 -5/1 -405 project. The City's mitigation is based on noon peak hour trips. Our trip generation analysis provides daily and AM and PM peak hour trip data. Future employees of the office could occasionally run errands and /or go out for lunch. This trip making is likely to be less than either the AM or PM peak hours. For analysis we presumed that the noon peak that the noon peak would be about 90% of the PM peak hour value. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report used existing traffic data collected at the pertinent street intersections identified for analysis. Level of service analyses were performed for existing and projected Tt* 'ya:s1� C:1- ProJecfs %T PROJECTSIT0846011T084601TIA.doc TpE t i'1 '+:`„t +k.. .r., .n ... .... .......r n... +rc: r.. ax »..,a...a. ,._o.r.;._ Andy Taber, Sr. Real Estate Director OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. February 22, 2001 Page 9 future traffic volumes, using the collected traffic data, for the without - project conditions. The z evaluation of the traffic impacts of the proposed plats was determined by adding project . w generated traffic to the future traffic volume projections and calculating the levels of service. mw The with - project traffic operations were then compared to the without - project operations. The comparison of traffic operations "with" and "without" the project identified that the project would o o o not cause a significant adverse affect on the operation of any of the study intersections. N w However, two of the analysis intersections currently operate at LOS F and would continue to do w i so "without" or "with' the project.. co w Based on our analysis the Opus Park 1 -5 /1 -405 should be approved with the following M traffic mitigation measures. u_ w a 1. The project should be constructed according to applicable City of Tukwila 'I w requirements. z i- 1 O 2. Site frontage improvements along 51s` Ave. S. and S. 151S Street. z 0 O D- a 1- w W I 1- � u. w z O - - _ o ~ MJJ:sv 3. Access driveways per the City's criteria. 4. Coordinate with the City of Tukwila staff and nearby developers regarding adding the S. 154 St. /52n Ave. S. intersection to their street improvements program. The stop controlled southbound movement is currently, and projected to operate, at LOS F "without" or "with" the project. The proposed developments pro -rata share amount at the intersection is 4.5. 5. Payment of $6,030 as a pro -rata contribution for the City of Tukwila's street improvement projects. No other traffic mitigation should be necessary. If you have any questions, please call me at 425.455.5320 or e-mail me at mjacobs @tranplaneng.com. Very truly yours, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. Mark J. JacoISs, I , P.T.O.E. Associate C:1- ProJeclslT PROJECTStT0846011T084601 TIA. doc TpE z TABLE 1 OPUS PARK I -511 -405 - TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Intersection Movement Existing 2006 Without Project 2006 With _ Project 51 Ave. S. /S. 144 St. OVERALL B (10.3) B (11.1) B (11.2) 51 Ave. S. /S. 151 St. OVERALL A 98.2) A (8.3) A (9.0) 51 Ave. S. /SR 518 westbound ramp NBLT B (10.1) B (10.9) B (11.5) 51 Ave. S. /SR 518 eastbound ramp EB B (15.0) C (17.2) C (19.2) Klickitat Dr. /SR 5 SB on -ramp SBLT B (12.6) B (13.8) B (14.3) 52 Ave. S. /S. 154 St. EBLT SB B (10.6) F (50.6) B (11.5) F (120 +) B (11.5) F (120 +) B (11.5) F (120 +) B (11.5) (1,2) E (35.8) SR 5 southbound off - ramp /S. 154th St. OVERALL C (34.9) C (39.6) D (40.2) Southcenter Blvd. /SR 405 SB off -ramp NBLT . D (32.1) E (35.5) E (48.9) Southcenter Blvd. /Macadam Rd. S. OVERALL B (17.8) B (22.3) B (22.7 Southcenter Blvd. /61 Ave. S. OVERALL D (40.8) D (46.3) D (47.4) NOTES: The number in parenthesis 0 is the average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle per the Highway Capacity Manual, updated December 1997. LOS with separate SBRT and SBLT approaches LOS with rechannelization of S. 154 St. to provide left turn channelization C:1-ProjectstT PROJECTS1T0846011T084601TIA.doc z =F 4- z W 00 co o H . N W W gQ = W z � �-- Z ~ w O • N o ff w W - U u- O .. z. 0 O~ z TABLE 2 OPUS PARK 1 -5/1 -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRIP GENERATION Time Period Average Trip Rate Trips Entering Trips Exiting Total I Light Industrial, Building "A" (ITE Land Use Code 110, 21,600 sq. ft.) Average Weekday T = 6.97X 75 (50 %) 75 (50 %) 150 AM Peak Hour T = 0.92X 18 (88 %) 2 (12 %) 20 PM Peak Hour T = 0.98X 3 (12 %) 18 (88 %) 21 Office Building, Building "A" (ITE Land Use Code 710, 43,200 sq. ft.) I General Average Weekday T = 11.01X 238 (50 %) 238 (50 %) 476 I AM Peak Hour T = 1.56X 59 (88 %) 8 (12 %) 67 I PM Peak Hour T = 1.49X 11 (17 %) 53 (83 %) 64 General Office Building, Building "B" (ITE Land Use Code 710, 37,000 sq. ft.) I Average Weekday T = 11.01X 204 (50 %) 204 (50 %) 408 AM Peak Hour T = 1.56X 51 (88 %) 7 (12 %) 58 II PM Peak Hour T = 1.49X 9 (17 %) 46 (83 %) 55 Single Family Detached Housing, Existing (ITE Land Use Code 210, 10 units) II Average Weekday T = 9.57X 48 (50 %) 48 (50 %) 96 AM Peak Hour T = 0.75X 2 (25 %) 6 (75 %) 8 I PM Peak Hour T = 1.01X 6 (64 %) 4 (36 %) 10 I NET NEW TRIPS Proposed Uses minus Existing Average Weekday -- 469 469 938 I AM Peak Hour -- 126 11 137 PM Peak Hour -- 17 113 130 X = 1,000 square feet, # of dwelling units T = Trips A vehicle trip is defined as a single or one direction vehicle movement with either the origin or destination (exiting or entering) inside the study site. The trip generation values identified in the above table account for all site trips made by all vehicles for all purposes, including commuter, visitor, recreation, service, and delivery vehicle trips. aSrxne, CA- Projecfs\T PROJECT S\T0846011T084601 TIA.doc TABLE 3 OPUS PARK I -5 /1 -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS PRO -RATA SHARE CONTRIBUT ONS FOR CITY STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Location Net New Peak our Trips Cost Per Net News Noon Peak Hour Trip Pro -Rata Share Contribution Southcenter Pkwy. /Strander Blvd 7 $140 $980 Andover Park E. /Strander Blvd. 2 135 270 Andover Park W. /Strander Blvd. 4 317 1,270 W. Valley Hwy. /S. 180 St. 1 475 480 Andover Park E. /Baker Blvd. 1 377 380 Andover Park W. /Minkler Blvd. (n /s lefts, signal) 1 392 390 Southcenter Pkwy. /S. 168 St. 3 167 500 W. Valley Hwy. /Strander Blvd 1 283 280 Interurban Bridge over Green River 1 1,122 1,120 Southcenter Pkwy. /Minkler Blvd. 2 137 270 Andover Park W. /Minkler Blvd. 1 89 90 I TOTAL $6,030 Noon peak hour trips for the subject project presumed to be about 90% of the PM peak hour trips. C:1- ProJeclslT PROJECTSIT0846011T084601TIA.doc z 1- • z � w 6 U O 0 w c w w 0 � = F _w Z t- 0 Z - w Li U 0 - 0 I- ww I I- U LL w Z = 0 z VICINITY MAP OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Z Z W QQ� J U 00 co o J 92 LL W 2 < w 0 I-W Z = i- 0 Z h- ill W 0 - . 0 I- W uj I I- - u'O .. W — 0 Z SITE PLAN OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS E Z Z W QQ • 2 J U U O U D Cf) U1 J F � WO • Q I FW Z = H F- O w ~ W U � O - W W H - u' O Z cn 0 O H z • Vip S. 154th St. S. 144th St. 2L 25 MPH LEGEND O Traffic Control Signal ci Stop Sign XX mph Posted Speed Limit --• Approach Lane & Direction XL Number of Roadway Lanes r 4 9- 1 /r Y U, 1`• fP 0 N not to scale t f EXISTING STREET CONDITIONS OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 - TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1�p �° ,'•�:;; y��:1,`.i'� t Y. l,:?»+ ��.« f %irHVr!:M,.:U»P•c E z ii- CL W 00 CO W = F-- CO LL W 2 IL.a = � z = t- O w �-. w U co O N O I- W Hi- LL O Z W U = O~ z Tuesday 01.25.01 1645 -1745 11-1 339 — ° S. 144th St. 24--0 444 —' Tuesday 01.25.01 1645 -1745 136 —' 1560 --► —140 -o--1518 489 -0- 1184 —1010 r 644 .--749 208 N not to scale Tuesday 01.25.01 1645 -1745 Tuesday 01.25.01 1645 -1745 Tuesday 01.25.01 1645 -1745 Wednesday 01.24.01 1645 -1745 LEGEND X PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction Wednesday 01.24.01 1645 -1745 Wednesday 01.24.01 1645 -1745 Wednesday 01.24.01 1645 -1745 Wednesday 01.24.01 1645 -1745 EXISTING PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS . .'F....m.E53tM1'4�'n'?rv?pa�F. FIGURE �p E 4 J J 1 10 —+" 375' 54th St. S. 144th St. —10 210 O r-- 35 )t c ° rN) 2 5 - 4 9 0 - 1 5 0 • --# 1715 — " ■155 -*--1670 540-6- 1300 "-825 0- 230 LEGEND N not to scale OPUS PARK 1-5/1-405 - TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 0 0) 0 s t O to co X- PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction * Collected January 2001 traffic volumes increased by 10% to better reflect average peak conditions ADJUSTED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES rA1, t3.:il" r, {wt. �"atF";ri+Y'•r: N'f��^.. - F�Sw�:�.vt...i..e�' — •raxr.•s »:f' a_ � I FIGURE 1 5 X--► PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction PROJECTED 2006 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/O PROJECT OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 - TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS S f FIGURE 6 Z ~ w J 0 00 U) cl J = 1.- U) LL w 0 Q _ d � 111 Z = H 1- 0 Z 1- L1.1 w cl 0 0- C3 F- W H UL .. z w — I 0 H- z 1:o co N not to scale PROJECT GENERATED NET NEW PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS ENTER 17 EXIT 130 LEGEND X--o- PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction I, PROJECT GENERATED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND DISTRIBUTION OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 - TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS E z .� w 00 co w J = I-- CD LL w 0 g Z C1 w z = zI- LL! w O � O - • F- 1/1 LL'O Z w 0 Z 523 -► 20 .-- 754 0 1843 --0 , r NIA 1-1251 • 11-0 415 154th St. � 107 x--910 S. 144th St. 32-0 540 193-0 1923 --1 X170 -11-.1847 608 -► 1450 .-912 0- 255 r 00 N not to scale LEGEND X-0. PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume & Direction PROJECTED 2006 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/ PROJECT OPUS PARK I -5 /I -405 — TUKWILA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS �FIGURE� , F E 8 J Z W 00 cn J = w • 0 2 u- Q I • O 1 W Z = 0 Z w U • co O - Cl F- WW _ H- tL O W z U = O ~ Z L__ L L _.s • t J • ► I _f NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR 1 HAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. UKWILA, WASHINGTON 61ST AVE S 144TH ST OC #1 TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 4 9 10 9 32 18 9 11 5 43 11 8 6 5 30 ' Grand Total 52 100 48 Apprch % 26.0 50.0 24.0 Total % 3.9 7.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 'ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 29 50 33 Percent 25.9 44.6 29.5 High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 4 18 11 Peak Factor 33 26 27 19 105 0 200 15.1 51ST AVE S From North L Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App.Total " Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 29 50 33 112 Percent 25.9 44.6 29.5 05:00 Volume 4 18 11 33 Peak Factor High InL 05:00 PM Volume 4 18 11 33 Peak Factor 0.848 112 33 0.848 5 58 0 39 2 47 3 45 10 189 9 3.8 5 9 11 3 10 33 191 81.6 58 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 26 373 71 , 0 5.5 79.4 15.1 2.0 28.1 5.4 S 144TH ST From East Groups Printed- PRIMARY 72 50 52 58 232 470 35.4 Right Thru 1 App. Total 34 234 14.5 9 72 05:00 PM 5 58 9 72 0.813 10 7 7 10 34 04:15 PM 16 193 42 251 6.4 76.9 16.7 05:00 PM 5 58 9 72 0.872 6 10 5 3 24 64 56 98 0 29.4 25.7 45.0 4.8 4.2 7.4 30 26.5 10 15 12 12 9 48 0 0 0 0 0 51ST AVE S From South Right Thru Left I App. Total 28 24.8 6 55 48.7 15 05:00 PM 10 6 15 04:30 PM 29 34 25.0 29.3 45.7 05:00 PM 10 6 15 31 29 24 22 106 218 16.4 113 0.911 53 116 0.935 16 42 7 47 17 47 4 43 44 179 73 325 16.7 74.2 5.5 24.5 31 31 31 44 18.3 16 3 9 2 9 23 0 0 0 0 0 178 74.2 42 File Name : TPE02301P Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 61 83 66 58 246 40 0 438 9.1 0.0 3.0 0.0 33.0 18 7.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 197 168 169 155 689 0.0 100.0 S 144TH ST From West Right Thru Left Truck App. Total O 240 0.0 O 61 05:30 PM 17 47 2 0 66 0.909 05:00 PM 44 179 23 0 246 17.9 72.8 9.3 0.0 05:30 PM 17 47 2 0 66 0.932 197 168 169 155 689 0 1326 1326 Int. Total] 0.887 699 197 1 51ST AVE S From North S 144TH ST From East 51ST AVE S From South S 144TH ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck APP' Right DIN Left Truck App' Fxclu. Inclu. InL Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 5 16 4 0 25 5 49 5 0 59 10 11 12 0 33 9 39 5 0 53 0 170 170 - 04:15 PM 6 11 2 0 19 5 41 9 0 55 8 3 12 0 23 9 28 3 0 40 0 137 137 04:30 PM 3 18 4 0 25 4 47 13 0 64 6 11 10 0 27 7 37 5 0 49 0 165 165 04:45 PM 6 12 8 0 26 2 47 11 0 60 6 7 16 0 29 4 42 4 0 50 0 165 165 Total 20 57 18 0 95 16 184 38 0 238 30 32 50 0 112 29 146 17 0 192 0 637 637 UKWILA, WASHINGTON 61ST AVE S 144TH ST OC #1 TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 4 9 10 9 32 18 9 11 5 43 11 8 6 5 30 ' Grand Total 52 100 48 Apprch % 26.0 50.0 24.0 Total % 3.9 7.5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 'ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 29 50 33 Percent 25.9 44.6 29.5 High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 4 18 11 Peak Factor 33 26 27 19 105 0 200 15.1 51ST AVE S From North L Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App.Total " Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 29 50 33 112 Percent 25.9 44.6 29.5 05:00 Volume 4 18 11 33 Peak Factor High InL 05:00 PM Volume 4 18 11 33 Peak Factor 0.848 112 33 0.848 5 58 0 39 2 47 3 45 10 189 9 3.8 5 9 11 3 10 33 191 81.6 58 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 26 373 71 , 0 5.5 79.4 15.1 2.0 28.1 5.4 S 144TH ST From East Groups Printed- PRIMARY 72 50 52 58 232 470 35.4 Right Thru 1 App. Total 34 234 14.5 9 72 05:00 PM 5 58 9 72 0.813 10 7 7 10 34 04:15 PM 16 193 42 251 6.4 76.9 16.7 05:00 PM 5 58 9 72 0.872 6 10 5 3 24 64 56 98 0 29.4 25.7 45.0 4.8 4.2 7.4 30 26.5 10 15 12 12 9 48 0 0 0 0 0 51ST AVE S From South Right Thru Left I App. Total 28 24.8 6 55 48.7 15 05:00 PM 10 6 15 04:30 PM 29 34 25.0 29.3 45.7 05:00 PM 10 6 15 31 29 24 22 106 218 16.4 113 0.911 53 116 0.935 16 42 7 47 17 47 4 43 44 179 73 325 16.7 74.2 5.5 24.5 31 31 31 44 18.3 16 3 9 2 9 23 0 0 0 0 0 178 74.2 42 File Name : TPE02301P Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 61 83 66 58 246 40 0 438 9.1 0.0 3.0 0.0 33.0 18 7.5 3 0 0 0 0 0 197 168 169 155 689 0.0 100.0 S 144TH ST From West Right Thru Left Truck App. Total O 240 0.0 O 61 05:30 PM 17 47 2 0 66 0.909 05:00 PM 44 179 23 0 246 17.9 72.8 9.3 0.0 05:30 PM 17 47 2 0 66 0.932 197 168 169 155 689 0 1326 1326 Int. Total] 0.887 699 197 1 zUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1ST AVE S S 144TH ST — pc #1 TPE01022M 51ST AVE S From North Start Right I Thm I Left I App.Total Right mm reak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 29 50 33 Percent 25.9 44.6 29.5 05:00 Volume 4 18 11 Peak Factor High Int 05:00 PM Volume 4 Peak Factor ro 2 112 9 191 3.8 81.6 33 5 58 05:00 PM 18 11 33 5 58 0.848 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 S 144TH ST From East Left File Name : TPE02301P Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 51ST AVE S S 144TH ST From South From West App. Total Right Thru Left I App. Total Right I Thm I Left I Truck I App.Total 34 234 30 28 55 113 44 178 18 0 240 14.5 26.5 24.8 48.7 18.3 74.2 7.5 0.0 9 72 10 6 15 31 16 42 3 0 61 05:00 PM 05:30 PM 9 72 10 6 15 31 17 47 2 0 66 0.813 0.911 0.909 51ST AVE S I k l 29 IJ RI9ht Tf1ru Lgft ' T North 1/23/01 4:45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY I 151 28 10bl 1 - 1131 I 241] Out In Total ri1STAVF S InL Total 1 0.887 699 197 2 UKWILA, WASHINGTON .;1ST AVE S S 151ST ST OC #2 TPE01022M Grand Total t Apprch % Total % 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total StartTlme _,Peak Hour From 04:00 Intersection Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High int. Volume Peak Factor Percent High Int. Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 42 29 32 16 119 3 1 4 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 243 14 0 0.0 94.6 5.4 0.0 38.9 2.2 51ST AVE S From North Rtgl Thm I Left PM to 05:45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 04:45 PM O 134 11 0.0 92.4 7.6 0 42 3 05:00 PM O 42 3 rak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 0 134 11 0.0 92.4 7.6 05:00 PM O 42 3 45 30 36 17 128 257 41.2 S 151ST ST From East App. Total Right Thru Loft I App.Totat Right 145 45 45 0.806 145 45 0.806 3 1 2 5 11 O 13 O 18 0 19 O 18 O 68 21 0 111 1 132 15.9 0.0 84.1 • 3.4 0.0 17.8 21.2 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 63 72 12.5 0.0 87.5 3 0 13 16 05:30 PM 2 0 19 21 0.857 05:00 PM 11 0 68 79 13.9 0.0 86.1 05:45 PM 5 0 18 23 0.859 Grouas Printed- PRIMARY 16 19 21 23 79 4 4 5 6 19 24 32 19 19 94 34 201 14.5 85.5 5.4 32.2 17 13.6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 108 86.4 24 04:45 PM 4 33 1 0 0 0 1 0 04:45 PM 17 108 13.6 86.4 0.0 04:45 PM 4 33 0 28 36 24 25 113 235 37.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 O 125 0.0 O 28 37 0.845 O 125 37 0.845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : TPE02302P Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 89 85 81 65 320 3 624 627 0.5 99.5 90 85 81 65 321 51ST AVE S From South From West Thru Left 1 App. Total flight 1 Thm I Left I Truck 1 - App.Total Int.Total 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0.961 342 89 3 51ST AVE S From North S 151ST ST From East 51ST AVE S From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thm Left Truck App. I Total Int. Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 33 1 0 34 4 0 6 0 10 0 35 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 79 - 04:15 PM 0 26 0 0 26 1 0 4 0 5 7 24 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 62 ■ 04:30 PM 0 34 1 0 35 2 0 20 1 22 4 15 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 76 77 04:45 PM 0 31 3 0 34 3 0 13 0 16 4 33 0 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 1 87 88 Total 0 124 5 0 129 10 0 43 1 53 15 107 0 1 122 0 0 0 0 0 2 304 306 UKWILA, WASHINGTON .;1ST AVE S S 151ST ST OC #2 TPE01022M Grand Total t Apprch % Total % 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total StartTlme _,Peak Hour From 04:00 Intersection Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High int. Volume Peak Factor Percent High Int. Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 42 29 32 16 119 3 1 4 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 243 14 0 0.0 94.6 5.4 0.0 38.9 2.2 51ST AVE S From North Rtgl Thm I Left PM to 05:45 PM • Peak 1 of 1 04:45 PM O 134 11 0.0 92.4 7.6 0 42 3 05:00 PM O 42 3 rak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 0 134 11 0.0 92.4 7.6 05:00 PM O 42 3 45 30 36 17 128 257 41.2 S 151ST ST From East App. Total Right Thru Loft I App.Totat Right 145 45 45 0.806 145 45 0.806 3 1 2 5 11 O 13 O 18 0 19 O 18 O 68 21 0 111 1 132 15.9 0.0 84.1 • 3.4 0.0 17.8 21.2 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 63 72 12.5 0.0 87.5 3 0 13 16 05:30 PM 2 0 19 21 0.857 05:00 PM 11 0 68 79 13.9 0.0 86.1 05:45 PM 5 0 18 23 0.859 Grouas Printed- PRIMARY 16 19 21 23 79 4 4 5 6 19 24 32 19 19 94 34 201 14.5 85.5 5.4 32.2 17 13.6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.0 0.0 108 86.4 24 04:45 PM 4 33 1 0 0 0 1 0 04:45 PM 17 108 13.6 86.4 0.0 04:45 PM 4 33 0 28 36 24 25 113 235 37.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 O 125 0.0 O 28 37 0.845 O 125 37 0.845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 File Name : TPE02302P Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0 0 1 89 85 81 65 320 3 624 627 0.5 99.5 90 85 81 65 321 51ST AVE S From South From West Thru Left 1 App. Total flight 1 Thm I Left I Truck 1 - App.Total Int.Total 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0.961 342 89 3 — UKWILA, WASHINGTON 1ST AVE S S 151ST ST OC #2 TPE01022M t 51ST AVE S From North Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 134 11 Percent 0.0 92.4 7.6 05:00 Volume 0 42 3 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 0 42 3 Peak Factor S 151ST ST 51ST AVE S From East From South Right I Thm I Left I App. Total Right Thru Left 145 9 0 63 72 12.5 0.0 87.5 45 3 0 13 16 05:30 PM 45 2 0 19 0.806 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 21 0.857 17 13.6 4 108 86.4 24 04:45 PM 4 33 0 0.0 0 0 App. Total 125 28 37 0.845 Right I Thru I Left I Truck I App. Total 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0.0 0 From West 0 0.0 0 51ST AVE S F —C)- 1il n r5] i asz� 1/23/01 4:45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY F 1971 Thru Left North Out In Total 51ST AVF S m ra co 0 File Name : TPE02302P Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 0 0 0.0 0 0 Int.Total J 0.961 342 89 4 I 51ST AVE S From North SR -518 WB ON RAMP From East 51ST AVE S From South SR -518 WB ON RAMP From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 14 24 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 119 1 151 0 0 0 0 0 189 04:15 PM 9 24 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 125 3 155 0 0 0 0 0 188 04:30PM 18 37 0 1 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 122 2 147 0 0 0 0 0 203 04:45 PM 7 31 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 124 3 164 0 0 0 0 0 202 Total 48 116 0 1 165 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 490 9 617 0 0 0 0 0 782 `JKWILA, WASHINGTON 51ST AVE S R -518 WB ON RAMP DC #3A TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 11 12 11 7 41 89 25.3 5.4 47 35 37 27 146 262 74.4 15.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.3 0.1 58 47 48 34 187 352 21.2 Zak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 41 150 0 0 Percent 21.5 78.5 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 11 47 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 05 :00 PM Volume 11 47 0 0 Peak Factor eak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:30PM Volume 48 150 0 1 Percent 24.1 75.4 0.0 0.5 High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 11 47 0 Peak Factor 191 58 58 0.823 199 0 58 0.858 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 35 24 27 115 O 233 1066 0.0 17.8 81.3 0.0 14.0 64.1 O 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 O 29 160 05:00 PM O 29 160 143 145 128 578 04:45 PM 0 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 0.9 05:00 PM O 29 2 191 0 178 1 170 0 155 3 694 12 1311 0.9 0.7 78.8 6 703 0.9 2 191 160 2 191 0.920 6 703 160 2 191 0.920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 File Name : TPE02303AP Site Code : 00000025 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 249 225 218 189 881 1663 0.898 894 249 5 51ST AVE S From North SR -518 WB ON RAMP From East 51ST AVE S From South SR -518 WB ON RAMP From West I.., Startlime Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thm Lett Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total InLTotal `JKWILA, WASHINGTON 51ST AVE S R -518 WB ON RAMP DC #3A TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 11 12 11 7 41 89 25.3 5.4 47 35 37 27 146 262 74.4 15.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.3 0.1 58 47 48 34 187 352 21.2 Zak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 41 150 0 0 Percent 21.5 78.5 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 11 47 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 05 :00 PM Volume 11 47 0 0 Peak Factor eak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:30PM Volume 48 150 0 1 Percent 24.1 75.4 0.0 0.5 High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 11 47 0 Peak Factor 191 58 58 0.823 199 0 58 0.858 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 35 24 27 115 O 233 1066 0.0 17.8 81.3 0.0 14.0 64.1 O 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 O 29 160 05:00 PM O 29 160 143 145 128 578 04:45 PM 0 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 0.9 05:00 PM O 29 2 191 0 178 1 170 0 155 3 694 12 1311 0.9 0.7 78.8 6 703 0.9 2 191 160 2 191 0.920 6 703 160 2 191 0.920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 File Name : TPE02303AP Site Code : 00000025 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 249 225 218 189 881 1663 0.898 894 249 5 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ;1ST AVE S SR -518 WB ON RAMP - ' - OC #3A TPE01022M Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:45 PM 41 150 0 21.5 78.5 0.0 11 47 0 Intersection Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 11 47 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 191 58 0 0 58 0.823 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 O 29 160 05:00 PM O 29 6 703 0.9 2 191 160 2 191 0.920 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM File Name : TPE02303AP Site Code : 00000025 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 U) in L h H T North 1/23/01 4 :45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY 41 ft T Iru L_572 I 1251 61 1 150 l 8531 Out In Total 51ST AVF S 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.898 894 249 6 51ST AVE S From North SR -518 WB ON RAMP From East 51ST AVE From South S SR -518 ' From Thri WB ON West I Left RAMP Truck Start Time Right Thm Left Truck T Right Thru Left Truck App. Right Thru Left Truck Total � '� Right I Total 1 InLTotal TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ;1ST AVE S SR -518 WB ON RAMP - ' - OC #3A TPE01022M Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 04:45 PM 41 150 0 21.5 78.5 0.0 11 47 0 Intersection Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 11 47 Peak Factor 0 0.0 0 191 58 0 0 58 0.823 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 125 572 0.0 17.8 81.4 O 29 160 05:00 PM O 29 6 703 0.9 2 191 160 2 191 0.920 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM File Name : TPE02303AP Site Code : 00000025 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 U) in L h H T North 1/23/01 4 :45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY 41 ft T Iru L_572 I 1251 61 1 150 l 8531 Out In Total 51ST AVF S 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.898 894 249 6 UKWILA, WASHINGTON 61ST AVE S ._SR -518 EB OFF RAMP OC #3 TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 44 39 35 28 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 0 0.0 10 U 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 262 51ST AVE S From North Start Time Right Thru Left :ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 150 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor Bak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 0 150 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 High Int 05:00 PM Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor 44 39 35 28 146 0 0 0 0 0 App. Total 0 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 100. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150 44 44 0.852 150 44 0.852 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 04:30 PM 0 0.0 05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0.250 0 1 1 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0.250 190 165 162 145 662 0 0 0 0 0 0 1251 0 10 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 53.2 0.0 SR -518 WB ON RAMP I 51ST AVE S SR -518 EB OFF RAMP From East From South From West Left Right Thru App. Total Right mm Left App.Total Right I mm I Left I App.Total 0 0.0 0 05:00 PM 0 190 04:45 PM 0 672 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:00 PM 0 190 0 1 0 1 0 2 672 100.0 190 190 165 162 145 662 1251 53.2 0 0.0 0 0 117 114 101 96 428 788 0 49 8 837 94.1 0.0 5.9 33.5 0.0 2.1 35.6 672 190 190 0.884 672 190 0.884 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 5 13 35 444 94.9 117 05:00 PM 117 0 8 125 0.936 04:45 PM 444 94.9 05:00 PM 117 2 1 1 1 5 0 0.0 0 File Name : TPE02303P Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 125 123 106 109 463 3 2 7 359 328 303 282 1272 0.8 99.2 24 468 5.1 8 125 0 24 468 0.0 5.1 0 8 125 0.936 0.899 362 329 305 283 1279 19 2351 2370 Int. Total 1291 359 51ST AVE S From North SR -518 WB ON RAMP From East 51ST AVE S F om South SR -518 EB OFF RAMP From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck T R ight Thru Left Truck App. Right Thru Left Truck App. Right Thru App. Le� Truck r Total Sulu. Tofu. I inc I Told. Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 f 04:00 PM 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 144 0 1 144 82 0 7 0 89 1 258 259 04:15 PM 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 0 1 148 84 0 3 1 87 2 260 262 04:30 PM 0 34 0 1 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 0 2 142 82 0 2 1 84 4 260 264 04:45 PM 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 4 155 112 0 2 1 114 5 301 306 Total 0 116 0 1 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 589 0 8 589 360 0 14 3 374 12 1079 1091 UKWILA, WASHINGTON 61ST AVE S ._SR -518 EB OFF RAMP OC #3 TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 44 39 35 28 146 0 0 0 0 0 0 262 0 0.0 10 U 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 1 262 51ST AVE S From North Start Time Right Thru Left :ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 150 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor Bak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:45 PM Volume 0 150 0 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 High Int 05:00 PM Volume 0 44 0 Peak Factor 44 39 35 28 146 0 0 0 0 0 App. Total 0 0 1 0 1 0.0 0.0 100. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 150 44 44 0.852 150 44 0.852 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 04:30 PM 0 0.0 05:15 PM 0 0 1 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 100.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 1 1 0.250 0 1 1 0.0 100.0 0 1 1 0.250 190 165 162 145 662 0 0 0 0 0 0 1251 0 10 0.0 10 0 0.0 0.0 53.2 0.0 SR -518 WB ON RAMP I 51ST AVE S SR -518 EB OFF RAMP From East From South From West Left Right Thru App. Total Right mm Left App.Total Right I mm I Left I App.Total 0 0.0 0 05:00 PM 0 190 04:45 PM 0 672 0 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:00 PM 0 190 0 1 0 1 0 2 672 100.0 190 190 165 162 145 662 1251 53.2 0 0.0 0 0 117 114 101 96 428 788 0 49 8 837 94.1 0.0 5.9 33.5 0.0 2.1 35.6 672 190 190 0.884 672 190 0.884 0 0 0 0 0 8 9 5 13 35 444 94.9 117 05:00 PM 117 0 8 125 0.936 04:45 PM 444 94.9 05:00 PM 117 2 1 1 1 5 0 0.0 0 File Name : TPE02303P Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 125 123 106 109 463 3 2 7 359 328 303 282 1272 0.8 99.2 24 468 5.1 8 125 0 24 468 0.0 5.1 0 8 125 0.936 0.899 362 329 305 283 1279 19 2351 2370 Int. Total 1291 359 _1 51ST AVE S From North Start Time Right I Thru L left I App. Total • aak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1011 ' Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 150 0 150 ' 1 Percent 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 44 0 44 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM --, Volume 0 44 Peak Factor - TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1ST AVE S SR-518 EB OFF RAMP — pc #3 TPE01022M 1 0 44 0.852 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B-195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360-491-8116 SR-518 WB ON RAMP From East Right I mm Left App. Total 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 100.0 0 1 0 05:15 PM 0 0.250 51ST AVE S From South Right mm Loft App. Total 0 0.0 0 672 100.0 190 05:00 PM 0 190 0 0.0 0 0 672 190 190 0.884 File Name : TPE02303P Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :2 SR-518 EB OFF RAMP From West Right mm I Left I App. Total 444 0 24 468 94.9 0.0 5.1 117 0 8 125 05:00 PM 117 0 8 125 0.936 T North /23/01 4:45:00 PM /23/01 5:30:00 PM 4 1 T t e r t CTO E1 L12611 Out in Total 51ST AVF S InL Total 1 0.899 1291 359 8 ;TUKWILA, WASHINGTON KLICKITAT DRV 1 -5 SB ON RAMP LOC # 5 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 172 181 179 181 713 0 1348 0.0 96.1 0.0 36.5 11 5 6 2 15 4 8 2 40 13 54 3.9 1.5 183 187 194 189 753 22 1402 Peak our From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 716 36 Percent 0.0 95.2 4.8 05:00 Volume 0 172 11 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 i• By Approach 05:00 PM Volume 0 713 40 Percent 0.0 94.7 5.3 High InL 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor 37.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 752 183 194 0.969 753 194 0.970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 i13 107 92 80 392 732 1564 31.9 68.1 19.8 42.3 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 224 208 186 157 775 379 32.4 113 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 5 0 12 0.0 0.0 792 67.6 224 05:00 PM 113 224 337 315 278 237 1167 2296 62.1 O 1171 0.0 O 337 0 04:45 PM 379 792 32.4 67.6 0.0 05:00 PM 113 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 337 0.869 O 1171 337 0.869 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 File Name : TPE02405P Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 3 5 3 18 520 502 472 426 1920 0.9 99.1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 527 505 477 429 1938 34 3698 3732 InL Total 0.925 1923 520 9 KLICKITAT DRV F om North KLICKITAT DRV From North 1 -5 NB ON RAMP From East KLICKITAT DRV From South KLICKITAT DRV From South Right I From West Thru I Left I App. Total Start Tlme Right I Thru I Left I App. Total Right' Thru I Left App. Total Right I Thru I Loki_ App. Total ;TUKWILA, WASHINGTON KLICKITAT DRV 1 -5 SB ON RAMP LOC # 5 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 172 181 179 181 713 0 1348 0.0 96.1 0.0 36.5 11 5 6 2 15 4 8 2 40 13 54 3.9 1.5 183 187 194 189 753 22 1402 Peak our From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 716 36 Percent 0.0 95.2 4.8 05:00 Volume 0 172 11 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 i• By Approach 05:00 PM Volume 0 713 40 Percent 0.0 94.7 5.3 High InL 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor 37.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 752 183 194 0.969 753 194 0.970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 i13 107 92 80 392 732 1564 31.9 68.1 19.8 42.3 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 224 208 186 157 775 379 32.4 113 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 5 0 12 0.0 0.0 792 67.6 224 05:00 PM 113 224 337 315 278 237 1167 2296 62.1 O 1171 0.0 O 337 0 04:45 PM 379 792 32.4 67.6 0.0 05:00 PM 113 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 337 0.869 O 1171 337 0.869 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 File Name : TPE02405P Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 3 5 3 18 520 502 472 426 1920 0.9 99.1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 527 505 477 429 1938 34 3698 3732 InL Total 0.925 1923 520 9 KLICKITAT DRV F om North 1 -5 NB ON RAMP From East KLICKITAT DRV From South F om West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App' Right Thru Left Truck App. Ecciu. Inclu. InL Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 139 3 2 142 0 0 0 0 0 113 203 0 1 316 0 0 0 0 0 3 458 461 04:15 PM 0 154 2 2 156 0 0 0 0 0 85 212 0 3 297 0 0 0 0 0 5 453 458 04:30 PM 0 158 5 3 163 0 0 0 0 0 75 200 0 2 275 0 0 0 0 0 5 438 443 04 :45 PM 0 184 4 2 188 0 0 0 0 0 67 174 0 1 241 0 0 0 0 0 3 429 432 Total 0 635 14 9 649 0 0 0 0 0 340 789 0 7 1129 0 0 0 0 0 16 1778 1794 ;TUKWILA, WASHINGTON KLICKITAT DRV 1 -5 SB ON RAMP LOC # 5 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 172 181 179 181 713 0 1348 0.0 96.1 0.0 36.5 11 5 6 2 15 4 8 2 40 13 54 3.9 1.5 183 187 194 189 753 22 1402 Peak our From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 716 36 Percent 0.0 95.2 4.8 05:00 Volume 0 172 11 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 i• By Approach 05:00 PM Volume 0 713 40 Percent 0.0 94.7 5.3 High InL 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 Peak Factor 37.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 752 183 194 0.969 753 194 0.970 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 i13 107 92 80 392 732 1564 31.9 68.1 19.8 42.3 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 224 208 186 157 775 379 32.4 113 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 5 0 12 0.0 0.0 792 67.6 224 05:00 PM 113 224 337 315 278 237 1167 2296 62.1 O 1171 0.0 O 337 0 04:45 PM 379 792 32.4 67.6 0.0 05:00 PM 113 224 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 337 0.869 O 1171 337 0.869 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 File Name : TPE02405P Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 7 3 5 3 18 520 502 472 426 1920 0.9 99.1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 527 505 477 429 1938 34 3698 3732 InL Total 0.925 1923 520 9 1'UKWILA, WASHINGTON KLICKITAT DRV 1-5 SB ON RAMP —LOC # 5 P TPE01022M KLICKITAT DRV From North Start Time Right mm Left App. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 716 36 752 Percent 0.0 95.2 4.8 05:00 Volume 0 172 11 183 Peak Factor High Int. 05:30 PM Volume 0 179 15 194 Peak Factor 0.969 1 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 1 -5 NB ON RAMP From East Right Thl Left App. Total O 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O 0 0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0 KLICKITAT DRV From South Right nitTn App. Total 379 792 0 1171 0 32.4 67.6 0.0 0.0 113 224 0 337 0 05:00 PM 3:45:00 PM 113 224 0 337 0.869 KLICKITAT DRV North 1 6 TIu Loft 1124/01 4:45:00 PM 1/24/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY I 7161 T r L_ .92 1867 Out In Total KI ICKITAT nRV A z 0 -4v 0 a File Name : TPE02405P Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No : 2 From West Right Thm 1— Left App. Total 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 Int. Total I 0.925 1923 520 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 52ND AVE S S 154TH ST LOC #4 TPE01022M - Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 26 0 Percent 27.7 0.0 05:30 Volume 11 0 Peak Factor HighlnL 05:30PM Volume 11 Peak Factor 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 4 3 11 8 26 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 20 12 61 Grand Total 49 0 135 Apprch % 26.6 0.0 73.4 Total% 2.0 0.0 5.5 0 0 0 1 2 184 68 72.3 20 0 20 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 23 0 74 Percent 23.7 0.0 76.3 High Int. 04:15 PM Volume 6 0 21 Peak Factor 20 16 31 20 87 7.5 22 17 19 18 76 145 1470 0. 8 1615 9.0 91.0 0.0 5.9 60.2 0.0 94 31 31 0.758 97 27 0.898 200 190 192 140 722 81 9.7 19 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 751 90,3 192 1 4 2 0 7 Groups Printed- 222 207 211 158 798 66.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 832 0 0.0 0 211 05:00 PM 22 200 0 222 0.937 04:30 PM 82 762 0 844 9.7 90.3 0.0 04:30 PM 20 203 0 223 0.946 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 82 95 75 331 0 622 0.0 96.7 0.0 25.5 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 2 9 1 0 1 0 2 21 4 643 3.3 0.9 0 0.0 0 339 96.9 95 File Name : TPE02304P Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 82 84 97 77 340 26.3 11 3.1 2 3 4 3 0 10 324 307 339 255 1225 0.6 99.4 350 97 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 04:45 PM O 339 11 350 0.0 96.9 3.1 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 14 2442 2456 InL Total 1 0.941 327 311 342 255 1235 1276 339 11 ?`":.'.. .:_:... .:�a::;iF!'...,_ 2 J.'�.. i ; , t rclv'>,.:. i",._`';''�:i::�+:'.- '.+.a: n. wn" u,": 15.+' �iJ" GS"`.+ vi;:: 1 ':::i'�w'i;S;,+S;ya��ti }:71;"J 52ND AVE S From North 52ND AVE S From North 52ND AVE S From South S 154TH ST From West S 154TH ST From East Start Time Right 52ND AVE S From South Left S 154TH ST From West App Start Time Right Thru Left I App. Total Right I Thru Left App. Total Right Thru 1 Gig App. Total Right I Thru Left App. Total TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 52ND AVE S S 154TH ST LOC #4 TPE01022M - Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 26 0 Percent 27.7 0.0 05:30 Volume 11 0 Peak Factor HighlnL 05:30PM Volume 11 Peak Factor 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 4 3 11 8 26 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 20 12 61 Grand Total 49 0 135 Apprch % 26.6 0.0 73.4 Total% 2.0 0.0 5.5 0 0 0 1 2 184 68 72.3 20 0 20 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 23 0 74 Percent 23.7 0.0 76.3 High Int. 04:15 PM Volume 6 0 21 Peak Factor 20 16 31 20 87 7.5 22 17 19 18 76 145 1470 0. 8 1615 9.0 91.0 0.0 5.9 60.2 0.0 94 31 31 0.758 97 27 0.898 200 190 192 140 722 81 9.7 19 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 751 90,3 192 1 4 2 0 7 Groups Printed- 222 207 211 158 798 66.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 832 0 0.0 0 211 05:00 PM 22 200 0 222 0.937 04:30 PM 82 762 0 844 9.7 90.3 0.0 04:30 PM 20 203 0 223 0.946 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 82 95 75 331 0 622 0.0 96.7 0.0 25.5 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 2 9 1 0 1 0 2 21 4 643 3.3 0.9 0 0.0 0 339 96.9 95 File Name : TPE02304P Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 82 84 97 77 340 26.3 11 3.1 2 3 4 3 0 10 324 307 339 255 1225 0.6 99.4 350 97 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 04:45 PM O 339 11 350 0.0 96.9 3.1 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 14 2442 2456 InL Total 1 0.941 327 311 342 255 1235 1276 339 11 ?`":.'.. .:_:... .:�a::;iF!'...,_ 2 J.'�.. i ; , t rclv'>,.:. i",._`';''�:i::�+:'.- '.+.a: n. wn" u,": 15.+' �iJ" GS"`.+ vi;:: 1 ':::i'�w'i;S;,+S;ya��ti }:71;"J 52ND AVE S From North S 154TH ST From East 52ND AVE S From South S 154TH ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App. Enclu. Inclu. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 4 0 18 0 22 14 182 0 1 196 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 2 0 74 1 292 293 04:15 PM 6 0 21 1 27 12 194 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 1 1 73 2 306 308 04 :30 PM 5 0 16 0 21 20 203 0 0 223 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 5 0 69 0 313 313 04:45 PM 8 0 19 0 27 23 169 0 0 192 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 4 1 87 1 306 307 Total 23 0 74 1 97 69 748 0 1 817 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 12 2 303 4 1217 1221 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 52ND AVE S S 154TH ST LOC #4 TPE01022M - Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 26 0 Percent 27.7 0.0 05:30 Volume 11 0 Peak Factor HighlnL 05:30PM Volume 11 Peak Factor 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 4 3 11 8 26 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 20 12 61 Grand Total 49 0 135 Apprch % 26.6 0.0 73.4 Total% 2.0 0.0 5.5 0 0 0 1 2 184 68 72.3 20 0 20 Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 23 0 74 Percent 23.7 0.0 76.3 High Int. 04:15 PM Volume 6 0 21 Peak Factor 20 16 31 20 87 7.5 22 17 19 18 76 145 1470 0. 8 1615 9.0 91.0 0.0 5.9 60.2 0.0 94 31 31 0.758 97 27 0.898 200 190 192 140 722 81 9.7 19 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 751 90,3 192 1 4 2 0 7 Groups Printed- 222 207 211 158 798 66.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 832 0 0.0 0 211 05:00 PM 22 200 0 222 0.937 04:30 PM 82 762 0 844 9.7 90.3 0.0 04:30 PM 20 203 0 223 0.946 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 82 95 75 331 0 622 0.0 96.7 0.0 25.5 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 2 9 1 0 1 0 2 21 4 643 3.3 0.9 0 0.0 0 339 96.9 95 File Name : TPE02304P Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 82 84 97 77 340 26.3 11 3.1 2 3 4 3 0 10 324 307 339 255 1225 0.6 99.4 350 97 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 04:45 PM O 339 11 350 0.0 96.9 3.1 05:30 PM O 95 2 97 0.902 14 2442 2456 InL Total 1 0.941 327 311 342 255 1235 1276 339 11 ?`":.'.. .:_:... .:�a::;iF!'...,_ 2 J.'�.. i ; , t rclv'>,.:. i",._`';''�:i::�+:'.- '.+.a: n. wn" u,": 15.+' �iJ" GS"`.+ vi;:: 1 ':::i'�w'i;S;,+S;ya��ti }:71;"J — TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 52ND AVE S S 154TH ST — #4 TPE01022M • 52ND AVE S From North Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App. Total leak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 26 0 68 94 Percent 27.7 0.0 72.3 05:30 Volume 11 0 20 31 Peak Factor High Int 05:30 PM Volume 11 0 20 Peak Factor 31 0.758 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 S 154TH ST From East Right I Thru I Left I App. Total 81 9.7 19 751 90.3 192 0 832 0.0 0 211 05:00 PM 22 200 0 222 0.937 52ND AVE S From South Right I Thm I Left I App. Total 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 05:30 PM 0 95 S 154TH ST From West Right mm Left App. Total 339 96.9 95 W 2 g — ► 52ND AVE S 92J RI ht Left 4 J L► North I 18 1/23/01 4:45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY Lto File Name : TPE02304P Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 11 3.1 2 2 350 97 97 0.902 Ini Total 0.941 1276 339 12 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. L I -5 SB OFF RAMP From North S 154TH ST From East 53RD AVE S From South S F 154TH ST om West StattlIme Right 1.0 Tim 0 180 T 1.0 Total RI1h Th 0 ie T icOk Total Ri 1.0 T 10 1.0 T ic0 Total RI 1.0 T 3 0 180 T !A Total Total I Totai Total Int Factor 04:00 PM 44 2 249 3 295 0 149 4 1 153 9 0 5 0 14 2 90 0 0 92 4 554 558 7 04:15 PM 43 1 229 5 273 0 156 3 0 159 11 0 3 1 14 3 87 0 1 90 7 536 543 1 04:30 PM 54 2 244 8 300 0 171 7 0 178 9 0 2 0 11 1 81 0 0 82 8 571 579 04:45 PM 42 1 244 3 287 0 153 8 0 161 8 0 3 0 11 3 101 0 2 104 5 563 568 Total 183 6 966 19 1155 0 629 22 1 651 37 0 13 1 50 9 359 0 3 368 24 2224 2248 UKWILA, WASHINGTON 1 -5 SB OFF RAMP /53RD AVE S S 154TH ST OC #6 TPE01022M I -5 SB OFF RAMP From North Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App. Total "3ak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1011 Intersection 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total 381 15 1874 31 Apprch % 16.8 0.7 82.6 Total % 8.7 0.3 42.6 Volume Percent 05:30 Volume Peak Factor High Int. Volume Peak Factor 55 58 40 45 198 3 6 0 0 9 241 240 237 190 908 3 3 3 3 12 299 304 277 235 1115 2270 51.6 0 0 0 0 0 195 10 962 1167 16.7 0.9 82.4 40 0 237 277 05:15 PM 58 6 240 oak Hour From 04 :00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 ' By Approach 04:30 PM Volume 209 12 969 Percent 17.6 1.0 81.4 High Int 05:15 PM Volume 58 6 240 Peak Factor 304 0.960 1190 304 0.979 157 143 165 116 581 0 1210 58 , 10 1268 0.0 95.4 4.6 0.0 27.5 1.3 0 0.0 0 6 13 7 10 36 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116, 618 94.8 165 1 6 2 0 9 Groups Printed PRIMARY 163 156 172 126 617 28.8 10 13 6 6 35 72 67.9 1.6 34 652 5.2 7 172 05:30 PM O 165 7 172 0.948 04:15 PM O 637 24 661 0.0 96.4 3.6 04:30 PM O 171 7 178 0.928 0 0 0 0 0 37 64.9 6 6 4 7 4 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 1 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.8 0 0.0 0 16 17 13 10 56 106 2.4 4 6 4 3 17 86 88 107 88 369 26 728 3.4 96.6 0.6 16.6 S 154TH ST From East Right I mm I Left I App. Total 53RD AVE S From South Right That I Left I App. Total S 154TH ST From West Right I Thru 1 App. Total Int Total 20 35.1 7 05:15 PM 13 0 4 04 :45 PM 37 0 20 64.9 0.0 35.1 05:15 PM 13 0 4 57 13 17 0.838 57 17 0.838 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 754 0,0 0.0 17 4.3 4 05:30 PM 4 107 0 111 0.899 04:46 PM 17 4.3 05:30 PM 4 1 0 1 0 2 382 95.7 107 File Name : TPE02306P Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No :1 90 94 111 91 386 17.1 0 0.0 0 5 9 6 3 23 568 571 573 462 2174 47 4398 4445 1.1 98.9 399 111 382 0 399 95.7 0.0 107 0 111 0.899 0,993 573 580 579 465 2197 2275 573 13 -- 'UKWILA, WASHINGTON 5 SB OFF RAMP /53RD AVE S S 154TH ST `:OC #6 TPE01022M Start Time Right I Thru I Left I App. Total Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peek 1 of 1 Intersection 04 :45 PM Volume 195 10 962 Percent 16.7 0.9 82.4 05:30 Volume 40 0 237 Peak Factor High int. Volume Peak Factor 1 -5 SB OFF RAMP From North TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 S 154TH ST From East Right I mm I Left I App. Total 1167 0 618 34 652 37 0.0 94.8 5.2 64.9 277 0 165 7 172 6 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:15 PM 58 6 240 304 0 165 7 172 13 0.960 0.948 53RD AVE S From South Right 1 mm I Left I App. Total 0 0.0 0 0 20 35.1 7 4 57 13 17 0.838 N = 2 A gc-1 ri)_ 5 in. co fO 1 -5 SB OFF RAMP i� " 6l E� North 1/23/01 4:45:00 PM 1/23/01 5:30:00 PM 41 T 191 Out In Total 5:1RM AVF S File Name : TPE02306P Site Code : 00000006 Start Date : 01/23/2001 Page No : 2 S 154TH ST From West Right I Thru I Left I App. Total 17 382 0 399 4.3 95.7 0.0 4 107 0 111 05:30 PM 4 107 0 111 0.899 Int. Total 0.993 2275 573 14 I. ^, 1-5 NB _ _ From_North ON RAMP SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East 1 -405 NB F OFF RAMPS om South SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW FromWest Startlime Right Thm Left _ _ Truck __ __ _.. A pp ' APP . _ ._ Right . __ Thru Lett _ Truck _____ Right Thru Left Truck App Right Thm Left Truck App. Ficlu. _ _ Inc1u. _ Int Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 224 138 0 8 362 54 0 17 0 71 0 352 0 10 352 18 785 803 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 213 151 0 3 364 68 0 10 2 78 0 378 0 13 378 18 820 838 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 212 130 0 7 342 62 0 29 6 91 0 342 0 10 342 23 775 798 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 220 168 0 7 388 79 0 31 2 110 0 365 0 9 365 18 863 881 Total 0 0 0 0 0 869 587 0 25 1456 263 0 87 10 350 0 1437 0 42 1437 77 3243 3320 ;UKWILA, WASHINGTON i -405 NB OFF RAMP SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW .00 # 7 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Start Time Right j Thm Left !oak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04 :45 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor leak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent High Int. Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 282 277 231 205 995 0 0 0 0 155 159 162 112 588 1864 1175 61.3 38.7 28.2 17.8 1010 61.1 282 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC() UNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 644 38.9 155 4 5 2 6 17 0, 42 3039 0.0 0.0 45.9 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 437 436 393 317 1583 47 53 48 62 210 473 71.9 7.2 I -5 NB ON RAMP SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From North From East App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total 0 1654 0.0 0 437 05:00 PM 282 155 0 437 0.946 04:45 PM 1010 644 0 1654 61.1 38.9 0.0 05:00 PM 282 155 0 437 0.946 0 0 0 0 0 32 17 28 21 98 2 4 2 0 8 0 185 18 0.0 28.1 0.0 2.8 1 -405 NB OFF RAMPS SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From South From West Right Thru Left App. Total Right I Thru I Left I App. Total 227 67.8 47 0 0.0 0 79 70 76 83 308 658 9.9 108 32.2 32 04:45 PM 79 0 31 04:15 PM 256 0 102 71.5 0.0 28.5 04 :45 PM 79 0 31 O 363 0 344 O 396 O 377 O 1480 0.0 0 335 100. 79 110 0.761 358 110 0.814 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 4 4 22 363 344 396 377 1480 O 2917 0 64 2917 0.0 0.0 44.1 0.0 44.1 O 1468 0.0 100.0 O 363 File Name : TPE02407P Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No : 1 12 17 8 10 47 879 850 865 777 3371 124 6614 6738 1.8 98.2 0 1468 0.0 0 363 05:30 PM 0 396 0 396 0.927 05:00 PM O 1480 0 1480 0.0 100.0 0.0 05:30 PM O 396 0 396 0.934 0.983 891 867 873 787 3418 InLTotal 3457 879 15 24ir l itttt H, • i1if_' Vii!? --TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ;405 NB OFF RAMP SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW OC# 7 P TPE01022M ■•••••••• 1-5 NB ON RAMP From North Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total StartTime • eak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:00 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B-195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360-491-8116 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East Right 1 Thru 1 Left j App. Total 0 1010 644 0 1654 227 61.1 38.9 0.0 67.8 O 282 155 0 437 47 05:00 PM 04:45 PM O 282 155 0 437 79 0.946 1-405 NB OFF RAMPS From South Right Thru F17eflt App. Total 0 0.0 0 108 32.2 32 0 31 335 79 110 0.761 3 2 o —1 CO c z w 2 1-5 NB ON RAMP 0 ToteL Flew lami 0 0 0 Right Tiu Left 1 124101 4:45:00 PM 1/24/01 5:30:00 PM 1MA North 4-1 T 1 lOie Efal L_35I Out In Total I-4(1,5 NR OFF RAMPS ID co 0) 00 c c •—■ m rn I co 0 File Name : TPE02407P Site Code : 00000007 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :2 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From West Right 1 Thru jtifpp.TotaI InL Total 0 0.0 0 1468 100.0 363 O 1468 0.0 O 363 05:30 PM 0 398 0 396 0.927 • • '• • ,,,, 0.983 3457 879 z 1 1— z • w 6 = 0 O 0 U) • 1.1.1 11.1 —1 1-- w o g < z F ._ o z 1— UJ j 0 • CI (r) O — O 1— • u 0 1— r - w z LL 1 6 O (I) P O 1— z UKWILA, WASHINGTON MACADAM RD S SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW ' -OC # 8 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 34 18 28 29 109 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 29 31 113 0 1 0 1 2 Grand Total 200 0 213 7 Apprch % 48.4 0.0 51.6 Total % 2.9 0.0 3.1 MACADAM RD S From North StartTlme Right Thru I App.Total oak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 108 0 107 215 Percent 50.2 0.0 49.8 05:00 Volume 34 0 23 57 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 34 0 23 57 Poak Factor 0.943 eak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 05:00 PM Volume 109 0 113 Percent 49.1 0.0 50.9 High InL 05:45 PM Volume 29 0 31 Peak Factor 57 48 57 60 222 413 6.0 27 45 42 41 155 282 2788 9.2 90.8 4.1 40.7 222 60 0.925 422 380 356 273 1431 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East From South Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thm I Left App. Total 140 8.4 27 04:45 PM 140 8.4 05:00 PM 27 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 1518 91.6 422 5 5 4 5 19 449 425 398 314 1586 0 54 3070 0.0 0.0 44.8 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1658 0.0 0 449 05:00 PM 27 422 0 449 0.923 1518 0 1658 91.6 0.0 422 0 449 0.923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM O 0 04:00 PM O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 362 0 366 0 417 O 393 O 1538 0 0 0 0 44 40 28 40 152 0 0.0 0 7 6 9 2 24 1560 92.0 362 File Name : TPE02408P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 406 406 445 433 1690 O 3117 251 61 3368 0.0 92.5 7.5 0.0 45.5 3.7 49.2 12 12 13 8 45 912 879 900 807 3498 122 6851 6973 1.7 98.3 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From West Right Thru Left App. Total 136 1696 8.0 44 406 05:30 PM O 417 28 445 0.953 04:45 PM O 1560 136 1696 0.0 92.0 8.0 05:30 PM O 417 28 445 0.953 Int. Total 0.978 924 891 913 815 3543 3569 912 17 MACADAM RD S From North SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East F om South - SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From West Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right 1 Thru Left I Truck App. Total Right Thru 1 left Truck APP. total Exclu. Total lulu. Total int. Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ' 04:OOPM 14 04:15 PM 21 04:30PM 28 04:45 PM 28 0 0 0 0 25 22 28 25 2 39 1 43 1 56 1 53 27 351 38 322 36 324 26 360 0 0 0 0 8 378 14 360 3 360 10 386 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 394 373 415 20 11 25 10 30 8 24 8 417 419 403 439 21 25 12 19 834 822 819 878 855 847 831 897 Total 91 0 100 5 191 127 1357 0 35 1484 0 0 0 0 0 0 1579 99 37 1678 77 3353 3430 UKWILA, WASHINGTON MACADAM RD S SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW ' -OC # 8 P TPE01022M 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 34 18 28 29 109 0 0 0 0 0 23 30 29 31 113 0 1 0 1 2 Grand Total 200 0 213 7 Apprch % 48.4 0.0 51.6 Total % 2.9 0.0 3.1 MACADAM RD S From North StartTlme Right Thru I App.Total oak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 108 0 107 215 Percent 50.2 0.0 49.8 05:00 Volume 34 0 23 57 Peak Factor High Int. 05:00 PM Volume 34 0 23 57 Poak Factor 0.943 eak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 05:00 PM Volume 109 0 113 Percent 49.1 0.0 50.9 High InL 05:45 PM Volume 29 0 31 Peak Factor 57 48 57 60 222 413 6.0 27 45 42 41 155 282 2788 9.2 90.8 4.1 40.7 222 60 0.925 422 380 356 273 1431 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East From South Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thm I Left App. Total 140 8.4 27 04:45 PM 140 8.4 05:00 PM 27 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 1518 91.6 422 5 5 4 5 19 449 425 398 314 1586 0 54 3070 0.0 0.0 44.8 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 0 0 0 0 0 0 1658 0.0 0 449 05:00 PM 27 422 0 449 0.923 1518 0 1658 91.6 0.0 422 0 449 0.923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0 3:45:00 PM O 0 04:00 PM O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 362 0 366 0 417 O 393 O 1538 0 0 0 0 44 40 28 40 152 0 0.0 0 7 6 9 2 24 1560 92.0 362 File Name : TPE02408P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 406 406 445 433 1690 O 3117 251 61 3368 0.0 92.5 7.5 0.0 45.5 3.7 49.2 12 12 13 8 45 912 879 900 807 3498 122 6851 6973 1.7 98.3 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From West Right Thru Left App. Total 136 1696 8.0 44 406 05:30 PM O 417 28 445 0.953 04:45 PM O 1560 136 1696 0.0 92.0 8.0 05:30 PM O 417 28 445 0.953 Int. Total 0.978 924 891 913 815 3543 3569 912 17 — TUKWILA, WASHINGTON MACADAM RD S SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW # 8 P TPE01022M Startilmo Peak Hour From 04:00 Intersection Volume Percent 05:00 Volume Peak Factor High int. Volume Peak Factor MACADAM RD S From North Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 PM to 05:45 PM-Peak 1 of 1 04:45 PM 108 0 107 50.2 0.0 49.8 34 0 23 05:00 PM 34 0 23 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B-195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360-491-8116 File Name : TPE02408P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :2 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East From South From West App. Total Right 1 Thru I Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thm 1 Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total int. Total 215 140 1518 0 1658 0 0 0 0 0 1560 136 1696 3569 8.4 91.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 92.0 8.0 57 27 422 0 449 0 0 0 0 0 362 44 406 912 0.978 05:00 PM 3:45:00 PM 05:30 PM 57 27 422 0 449 0 0 0 0 0 417 28 445 0.943 0.923 0.953 2 MACADAM RD S r E . r 0 Right Loft 4J L North 1/24/01 4:45:00 PM 1/24101 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY 4 2 18 - „ • • - • •• • • 4. • 4 • . • V.A. I Ir.. . _ - 7TUKWILA, WASHINGTON '61ST AVE S _SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW M LOC # 9 P TPE01022M - 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Grand Total 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 From North Start Time Right I_ Thru Left I App. Total - -_peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent High Int - Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 O 187 67 0 198 45 O 189 43 0 150 47 0 724 202 0 1330 384 35 1714 0.0 77.6 22.4 0.0 19.4 5.6 25.1 0 0 0.0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 749 78.3 189 3 5 3 5 16 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 254 243 232 197 926 14 15 18 21 68 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East Right Thru I Left App. Total 208 957 21.7 43 232 05:00 PM 0 187 67 254 0.942 04:45 PM O 749 208 957 0.0 78.3 21.7 05:00 PM O 187 67 254 0.942 0 0 0 0 0 266 210 219 163 858 142 0 1683 54 7.8 0.0 92.2 2.1 0.0 24.6 73 7.6 18 4 2 6 4 16 280 225 237 184 926 1825 26.7 61ST AVE S From South 0 0.0 0 891 92.4 219 05:00 PM 14 0 266 04:45 PM 73 0 891 7.6 0.0 92.4 05:00 PM 14 0 266 253 280 320 334 1187 127 111 129 101 468 2381 921 72.1 27.9 34.8 13.5 SOUTHCENTER BLVD W From West Right Thm - ]'Left j App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total 964 237 280 0.861 964 280 0.861 0 0 0 0 0 11 7 9 3 30 0 75 3302 0.0 0.0 48.3 1184 70.8 320 489 29.2 129 File Name : TPE02409P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 380 391 449 435 1655 18 14 18 12 62 914 859 918 816 3507 932 873 936 828 3569 2.3 97.7 0 1673 0.0 0 449 04:45 PM 331 122 0 453 0.923 04:45 PM 1184 489 0 1673 70.8 29.2 0.0 04:45 PM 331 122 0 453 0.923 164 6841 7005 InL Total 0.979 3594 918 19 From North SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East 61ST AVE S From South SOUTHCENTER BLVD W From West Start Time Right T Left Truck App Right Thru Left Truck App Right Dm Left Truck App Right mm Left Truck App. Fxclu. Inciu. Int. Total Total Total Total Total Total Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:OOPM 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 44 5 186 14 0 217 8 231 307 109 0 14 416 27 833 860 , 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 32 5 182 20 0 198 14 218 269 115 0 13 384 32 784 816 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 53 4 192 14 0 214 5 228 287 107 0 9 394 18 814 832 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 53 5 228 26 0 196 11 222 331 122 0 9 453 25 903 928 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 606 182 19 788 74 0 825 38 899 1194 453 0 45 1647 102 3334 3436 7TUKWILA, WASHINGTON '61ST AVE S _SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW M LOC # 9 P TPE01022M - 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i Grand Total 0 0 0 Apprch % 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 From North Start Time Right I_ Thru Left I App. Total - -_peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 0 Peak Factor Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 04:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent High Int - Volume Peak Factor 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 O 187 67 0 198 45 O 189 43 0 150 47 0 724 202 0 1330 384 35 1714 0.0 77.6 22.4 0.0 19.4 5.6 25.1 0 0 0.0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 749 78.3 189 3 5 3 5 16 Groups Printed- PRIMARY 254 243 232 197 926 14 15 18 21 68 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East Right Thru I Left App. Total 208 957 21.7 43 232 05:00 PM 0 187 67 254 0.942 04:45 PM O 749 208 957 0.0 78.3 21.7 05:00 PM O 187 67 254 0.942 0 0 0 0 0 266 210 219 163 858 142 0 1683 54 7.8 0.0 92.2 2.1 0.0 24.6 73 7.6 18 4 2 6 4 16 280 225 237 184 926 1825 26.7 61ST AVE S From South 0 0.0 0 891 92.4 219 05:00 PM 14 0 266 04:45 PM 73 0 891 7.6 0.0 92.4 05:00 PM 14 0 266 253 280 320 334 1187 127 111 129 101 468 2381 921 72.1 27.9 34.8 13.5 SOUTHCENTER BLVD W From West Right Thm - ]'Left j App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total 964 237 280 0.861 964 280 0.861 0 0 0 0 0 11 7 9 3 30 0 75 3302 0.0 0.0 48.3 1184 70.8 320 489 29.2 129 File Name : TPE02409P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No :1 380 391 449 435 1655 18 14 18 12 62 914 859 918 816 3507 932 873 936 828 3569 2.3 97.7 0 1673 0.0 0 449 04:45 PM 331 122 0 453 0.923 04:45 PM 1184 489 0 1673 70.8 29.2 0.0 04:45 PM 331 122 0 453 0.923 164 6841 7005 InL Total 0.979 3594 918 19 JKWILA, WASHINGTON „1ST AVE S SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW OC # 9 P TPE01022M From North Startiime Right Thru Left Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:45 PM Volume 0 0 0 Percent 0.0 0.0 0.0 05:30 Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor High Int. 3:45:00 PM Volume 0 0 0 Peak Factor App. Total 0 0 0 TRAFFICOUNT 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SW From East Right Thru Left App. Total 0 0.0 0 749 78.3 189 208 957 21.7 43 232 05:00 PM 0 187 67 254 0.942 61ST AVE S From South Right Thru Lett File Name : TPE02409P Site Code : 00000009 Start Date : 01/24/2001 Page No : 2 SOUTHCENTER BLVD W From West App.Total Right Thru Left App. Total 73 0 891 964 1184 489 0 1673 7.6 0.0 92.4 70.8 29.2 0.0 18 0 219 237 320 129 0 449 05:00 PM 04:45 PM 14 0 266 280 331 122 0 453 0.861 0.923 North 1/24/01 4:45:00 PM 1/24/01 5:30:00 PM PRIMARY 1 i r► I Let9triBigth 113921 0 364 35 Out In Total A1ST AVF S 4 -2 .ra a cn 0 l' x n — m m 73 to — o p a 01 Int. Total 0.979 3594 918 20 Sr ''Fff{'k elrnfr erAs ernSee!;!?. PIOn enRN.f!6: F�IK'2k�Y.i•FUw i heport Period: 1/1/96 to 12/31/00 l irridor: S 144 ST between 51 AVE S and S 160 ST S144STat51A.YY :ar: 1998 ear: Date Collision !ar: 1999 Date Collision N 1998 early Totals: Totals for Corridor '`' of Collisions: ttal Vehicles Involved: Time Of Collision ' :: 1 ' ►r I Sat -10l 1998 :1 Yearly Totals: Number of Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Wed- 02/17/1999 0 PM 990111 Right Angle yearly Totals: Number ofCollls -on 1 ..Ink Totals: Number of Collisions 2 . 144 ST. 00Q500 ft. E of MILITARY RD S Year: 2000 Time Of Collision 3 :40:00 AM Date Collision Mon - 11/06/2000 early Totals: Number oUCoffision 1 Link Totals: Number of Collisions I 144 ST, 200 fl. E of MILITARY RD S Time Of Collision 1: 1• *1 AM Number orColifsion ink Totals: Number of Collisions Case Number Type of Collision Case Direction Num Num Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Vets 2 Fat Inj PDO 00 -8185 Fixed Object/Parka Vehicle -> P 4 I Case Number Type of Collision S 9 I 1 ear n City of Tukwila Corridor Report 02/15/2001 t Ang e Page 1 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh I Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W - >E P - 21 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh I Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S - >N E - >W P 21 Totals: U U 1 0 2 T otals: U U 1 U 2 Totals: 0 0 2 0 4 Hit & Tot Run Veh 0 I 0 Totals: 0 0 1 0 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh S - >N E - >W 3I 1 otals: U ll U Q 3 Totals: 0 0 0 0 3 1� I 21 J 1_1 e e NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. O 00 • r 1, • • 1• e -� Thu- 05/27/1999 Mon -06/14/1999 Wed- 08/11/1999 Tue -0824/ 1999 Fri- 08/27/1999 Fri- 1022/1999 Wed - 1124/1999 Fri- 12/03/1999 Sat- 12/04/1999 eary o . Year. 2000 urn Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Mon - 01/03/2000 Wed - 01/05/2000 Fri-01/21/2000 Thu- 02/102000 Wed-02/16/2000 Mon - 08/142000 Sat - 0826/2000 Sat- 09/30/2000 Yearly Totals: Number uFColiiswon 8 Link Totals: Number of Collisions 37 Totals for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: 10:47:00 AM 8:20:00 PM 7:13:00 AM 12:40:00 PM 6:55 :00 PM 2:05:00 PM 3:39:00 PM 3:20:00 PM 5:44:00 PM ro o son 8:43:00 PM 1:50:00 PM 10:30:00 AM 8:35:00 PM 11:45:00 AM 11:55:00 AM 9:54:00 AM 12:12:00 PM pproac urn 9904136 Rear End 9904617 Sideswipe 9906233 Sideswipe 9906629 Approach Turn 9906742 Right Angle 9908334 Rear End 999242 Approach Turn 999475 Rear End 999508 Sideswipe 00077 Sideswipe 0000123 Right Angle 00545 Approach Turn 001071 Sideswipe 0001205 Right Angle 006015 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle 006325 Rear End 007189 Approach Turn N - >S Prk E->W E->W N - >S N - >S S - >W N - >S E S-)W W - >E Prk W - >S N - >S E - >W Prk S - >N S - >N oa 5: Number Type of Collision 37 80 0 (0.00 %) 25/8 67.57 %) 12 (32.43% Page 2 Direction Num Nun Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veil 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh E - >W S - >w W - >S S - >W N - >S N - >W W - >E S - >N E -> W N - >S N - >S N->W S - >w W - >E N - >E Totals: 1 1 1 2 P Totals: 0 8 12 5 80 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 H 2 P 2 0 4 24 . � 5._ %e��� }�'',w`aLSY ::'�J7�C i {�X'J.W'• �* .,`4'iT Au ti Report Period: 1/1/96 to 12/31/00 Corridor: SOUTHCENTER BLVD between 51 AVE S and MACADAM RD S SOUTHCENTER BLVD at MACADAM RA Year: 1996 Date Collision Mon - 01/22/1996 Sat- 03/02/1996 Tue- 04/30/1996 Sun-05/19/1996 Tue- 07/30/1996 Sat - 11/16/1996 Thu - 11/21/1996 Yearly 1 vials: Num Year: 1997 Date Collision ►r t_ • • Wed-04/30/1997 Tue- 06/03/ 1997 Sat- 07/05/1997 Fri - 10/03/1997 Mon- 11/10/1997 Time Of Collision 6:37:00 PM 9:35:00 PM 2:15:00 PM 5:50:00 PM 3:10:00 PM 11:36:00 AM 8:45:00 AM ber of Time Of Collision 10:00:00 AM 5:10:00 PM 4:40:00 PM 5:40:00 PM 2:09:00 PM Yearly Totals. Number of Year: 1998 Date Collision Tue - 02/24/ 1998 Sun - 0426/1998 Wed-04/29/1998 Sat - 05/09/1998 Tut - 05/26/1998 Sat-06/20/1998 Sat- 10/03/1998 Yearly Totals: Number orColliafou Year: 1999 Date Time Of Collision 1:00:00 PM 5:00:00 PM 6 :03:00 PM 12:00 :00 AM 3:13:00 PM 4:41:00 PM 12:55:00 PM Time Of Case Number Type of Collision 960682 Rear End 962013 Approach Tum 963804 Approach Tum 964368 Right Angle 966489 Approach Turn 969984 Right Angle 9610148 Approach Turn 7 Case Number Type of Collision • ear n • 973753 Right Angle 974774 Rear End 975709 Rear End 9708485 Rear End 979647 Rear End 6 Case Number 985493 983647 983739 9804022 984563 985370 988448 7 Case l,1ly 0I 1 UKWllll Corridor Report 02/15/2001 Type of Collision Right Angle Approach Turn Rear End Rear End Rear End Reer End Right Angle Page 1 Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 W - >E E->W E - >W - >S N - >E W - >E W - >N E - >W W - >E E- >W E - >W E- >W W - >E W - >N N - >E - >S E->W N - >E N - >W Totals: N - >E W - >E E - >W Prk B Totals: Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 N - >E E - >W E - >W N - >E W - >E W - >E W - >E W - >E Prk W - >E Prk E - >W N - >E Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Fat Inj PDO Run Veh 2 1 2 2 2 P 11 2 1 2 P 2 P 2 O 4 4 1 14 Direction Num Nunn Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Num Fat 4 P 2 2 P 2 1 3 P 2 O 1 4 0 15 1 Num Num Num Inj PDO 1 2 2 2 P Hit & Tot Run Veh 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 Hit & Tot 25 k. Lib': 5.: '!r..Yavl e; F!'S'.*f�Y2it4t! - Collision 1 1' :r ••• 11 •T un- Sat - 03/20/1999 Sun - 04/04/1999 Sun- 04/04/1999 Mon - 04/05/1999 Sat - 11/13/1999 Sun - 11/28/1999 Mon - 11/29/1999 Wed - 12/08/1999 Fri- 12/10/1999 Sat -12/I 8/1999 ear y o s: ' um Year: 2000 Date Collision Wed - 05/31/2000 Sun -11 /12/2000 Fri - 11/24/2000 Collision 11:51:00 AM 2:46:00 PM 7:05:00 PM 5:49:00 PM 12:30 :00 PM 1:23:00 PM 10:50:00 AM 4:40:00 PM 10:25:00 AM 12:09:00 AM er 0 0 :non Time Of Collision 12:02:00 PM 10:16:00 AM 11:40:00 AM Yearly Foists: Number of Collision Link Totals: Number of Collisions Number Type of Collision ear n 992253 Right Angle 992697 Pedestrian/Cyclist Involved 992701 Rear End 992721 Rear End 998922 Rear End 999334 Rear End 9909358 Sideswipe 999616 Approach Turn 9909664 Rear End 999882 Other Case Number 004065 00 -08328 00 -08626 3 34 Type of Collision Approach Turn Right Angle Right Angle SOUTHCENTER BLVD, 004000 ft, E of 53 AVE S Year: 1997 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Frt- 09/16/1997 6:20:00 978246 Rear End E - >W Prk Yearly Totals: Number of Collisi on I Tofa(s: b 0 i 0 z Link Totals: Number of Collisions SOVTHCENTER BLVD, 50 FT N of 53 AVE S Year 1997 Date Collision Sat - 12/06/1997 eary o a s: 'um•ero Year: 2000 Date Collision Link Totals: Number of Collisions Totals for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: 1 Time Of Case Collision Number Type of Collision 8:16:00 AM 970859 Right Angle Time Of Collision Case Number Type of Collision 2 37 80 0 (0.00 %) . xscle�sa�eaa;�oa�: i Page 2 Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W -> S - >W W - >E P E - >W N - >E P W - >E W - >E P W - >E Prk 1 W - >E W - >E W - >E W W - >N W - >N W - >N E - >W E->W Prk N - >S O a 8: Direction Veh 1 Veh 2 E - >W W - >N E - >W N - >E E - >W N - >E Num Num Fat Inj PDO P P P Totals: 0 9 3 1 Totals: 0 16 15 2 74 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Totals: 0 1 1 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 Hit & Tot Run Veh 2 H 2 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh P 2 — o as! i 1 o t ston Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh • • e• -1 • 111 :1 : • 11 • I� esw:pe -> I > 11 1 ear y o a s: ' urn • er o o talon os.: 26 z ,= Z QQ JU 0 U) C CO J = F- u_ w O L Q = • a w z I 1— O z 1-- 111 w U� O t F- w ill I u' O III = 0 z Report Period: 1/1/96 to 12/31 /00 Corridor: S 154 ST between 51 AVE S and MACADAM RD S S 154 ST at T1i3 Year: 1998 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Sat- 03/28/1998 4:52:00 PM 982769 Rear End S - >E S - >N 1 H 21 Yearly Totals: Number of Collision I Totals: U I U 1 2 y J LLj `. a = W Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Z I Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh O Thu - 10/28/1999 6:30:00 AM 990834 Approach Turn S - >E S - >E 1 21 Z I— Yearly Totals: Number of Collision I Totals: U I U 0 2 D 0 Link Totals: Number of Collisions 2 Totals: 0 2 0 1 4 0 s O S 154 ST, 001500 ft. E of TD3 w Year: 2000 LL 0 Year: 1999 Date Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Collision Number Type of Collision Veh I Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh Mon - 08/07/2000 10:10:00 PM 005877 Backing Bck B P 21 Yearly l otus: Number 01 1 totem: U U I U 2 Link Totals: Number of Collisions 1 S 154 ST. 100 F 4' E of PACIFIC HWY SO. Year: 1996 Date Collision ear n- y Year: 1997 Time Of Case Collision 11 ' • 1• " 0 s: '11m''ro 0 son Number Type of Collision Approach Turn Date Time Of Case Collision Collision Number Type of Collision i [Sun- 06/08/1997 5:25:00 PM 974898 Rear End < Ily UI 1 UMW Corridor Report 02/15/2001 Page 1 Totals: 0 0 1 0 2 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh N - >S E - >W 1 2 oas: U Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh I Veil 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W - >E W - >l: I 2 27 z _I- w 0O to o W • I W O .z W O~ z eary oas: • um Year: 1997 Year: 1999 Date Collision at -1 Year: 2000 Date Collision Date Collision Sun - 11103/1996 Year: 1999 Totem for Corridor Number of Collisions: Total Vehicles Involved: Number of Fatalities: Number of Injuries: Number of PDOs: Time Of Collision on Link Totals: Number of Collisions S 154 ST, 150 FT E of PACIFIC HWY SO. Date Time Of Collision Collision Thu-03/MM 4 :25:00 PM Tue- 04/22/1997 4:40:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of'Colliswn Time Of Collision 1 '. ... .. • 1? Yearly Totals : of Collision I : 1 111 . • :$ l • 11 Yearly Totals: Number of Collision Link Totals: Number of Colllslons 4 S 154 ST, 200 Fr of PACIFIC HWY SO. Year: 1996 Yearly Totals: Number of Collision Date Time Of Collision Collision � Tue- 04/13/1999 4:45:00 PM Yearly Totals: Number of Collision Link Totals: Number of Collisions 2 Case Number Type of Collision 972740 Approach Turn 973517 Sideswipe 2` Case Number Type of Collision 1 Case Number Type of Collision 4 : pproac i 'Turn 1 Time Of Case Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Collision Number Type of Collision Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Ri-ti Veh 2:20:00 AM 969515 Fixed Object/Parked Vehicle W - >g - P 1 1 'Tars: 0 Case Number Type of Collision 9902958 Approach Tum 1 2 11 21 0 (0.00 %) 6/4 54.55 %) 5 (45.45% i. eswipe Page 2 0 a S: Totals: 0 Direction Veb 1 Veh 2 W->/s1 E -> W E - >W E - >W -> oI�'tafs: 0 2 0 Nun Num Fat Inj PDO P P Totals: U U 2 U 4 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh 0 U Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Run Veh W-7•14 2 7 otaiss: U U 1 0 2 Totals: 0 0 3 0 8 Direction Num Num Hit & Tot Veh 1 Veh 2 Fat Inj PDO Rut Veh W - >N E->W 21 Totals: 0 li U U Totals: 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 Hit & Tot Run Veh 2 2 0 2 28 Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Mark Jacobs HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S 144th St /51st Ave S City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, S14451ex Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, existing Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 144th St North /South Street: 51st Ave S Fax: 425-453-5759 Worksheet 2 • Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I Volume 120 195 50 135 210 10 160 30 35 135 55 30 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration - LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 278 267 130 124 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting-lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 • Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Li L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 278 267 130 124 29 hadj, computed -0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 Left -Turn 21 36 63 36 Right -Turn 52 10 36 31 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 Prop. Right -Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10 -40: hLT -adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT -adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV -adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 278 267 130 124 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.25 0.24 0.12 0.11 hd, final value 4.81 4.92 5.30 5.28 x, final value 0.37 0.36 0.19 0.18 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 2.8 2.9 • 3.3 3.3 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 278 267 130 124 Service Time 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.3 Utilization, x 0.37 0.36 0.19 0.18 Dep. headway, hd 4.81 4.92 5.30 5.28 Capacity 528 517 380 374 Delay 10.62 10.71 9.54 9.46 LOS B B A A Approach: Delay 10.62 10.71 9.54 9.46 LOS B B A A Intersection Delay 10.29 Intersection LOS B 30 �. � ,« :,:tti;`f.! ?ti§.�'i�. 4 � }t � a.; n� Y e � y � �..r,...u.t,.�,� � o t "N.r�rti+✓.'k�. S' �..... ..... ., .i...... _...._ ....'i_.« .. �....... t .....,. 1+•.+• S4. r+ � 11"" .J. " ::+}?.+YLM1Y'';Y+'.'++. 3 .«L?, -...F .. . ..�_i,���+ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S 144th St /51st Ave S City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, S14451fu Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 wk project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 144th St North /South Street: 51st Ave S Fax: 425-453-5759 Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I I I I I Volume 120 215 55 140 230 10 165 35 40 140 60 35 % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 304 294 146 141 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 Li L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 304 294 146 141 Left -Turn 21 42 68 42 Right -Turn 57 10 42 36 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 Prop. Right -Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 Prop. Heavy Vehicle0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT -adj hRT -adj hHV -adj hadj, computed 0.2 -0.6 1.7 •0.1 0.2 -0.6 1.7 0.0 0.2 0.2 -0.6 -0.6 1.7 1.7 -0.1 -0.1 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 304 294 146 141 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.27 0.26 0,13 0.13 hd, final value 4.98 5.09 5.49 5.49 x, final value 0.42 0.42 0.22 0.21 Move-up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.5 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 304 294 146 141 Service Time 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.5 Utilization, x 0.42 0.42 0.22 0.21 Dep. headway, hd 4.98 5.09 5.49 5.49 Capacity 554 544 396 391 Delay 11.53 11.65 10.06 9.98 LOS B B B A Approach: Delay 11.53 11.65 10.06 9.98 LOS B B B A Intersection Delay 11.08 Intersection LOS B 32 z Z J 00 o L/./ • I JF- 2 u- w gQ = • d w z �` t- 0. w ~ o. U .O 5 P- CI 1-- w W - U u' w Z. U D. H 2 0 z Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 % Thrus Left Lane HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 Fax: 425-453-5759 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Z ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS j- w cc 2 Intersection: S 144th St /51st Ave S .j0 City /State: Tukwila, WA o o Analyst: MJJ, S14451wp w = Project No.: T084601 -I F- Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/ project N o Date: 1/30/01 w East /West Street: S. 144th St North /South Street: 51st Ave S. "- a = w Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics f _ I Eastbound I Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I w O � I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I 2 m no Volume 120 215 56 141 230 10 1 170 38 45 140 60 35 I I o w I I- i u. O Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound iii z L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 v OH Z Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 305 295 160 141 J Heavy Veh 0 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 1 Geometry group 1 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Worksheet 3 Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 305 295 160 141 33 ••■:,' .:'r" ,. ... r'r. �S '�,: ✓3+.k l.aj..z..;.ittil^�� -:µn:r an.r . y.ti -s%+ c�.._� .r...- G:�f »'wr;'i mo .. ' ,, - ntidy «..af• *!u'. _ . , _ -�`�r.. �.;Cj:4 u:t a:� 1 . j J Left -Turn 21 43 73 42 Right -Turn 58 10 47 36 Prop. Left -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 Prop. Right•Turns 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 Prop. Heavy Vehicie0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 1 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10 -40: hLT -adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT-adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV -adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 z hadj, computed •0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 = I. Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time c Q e Ill OA Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound U o L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 u) w Flow rate 305 295 160 141 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 co Li x, initial 0.27 0.26 0.14 0.13 w hd, final value 5.02 5.14 5.51 5.53 g x, final value 0.43 0.42 0.24 0.22 i I. a Move up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 = a Service Time 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.5 _ z1.- Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service w O w Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound n o L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 ; 92 Ill w 1 1-- Flow Rate 305 295 160 141 Service Time 3.0 3.1 3.5 3.5 Utilization, x 0.43 0.42 0.24 0.22 Dep. headway, hd 5.02 5.14 5.51 5.53 Capacity 555 545 410 391 Delay 11.69 11.82 10.28 10.05 LOS B B B B Approach: Delay 11.69 11.82 10.28 10.05 LOS B B B B Intersection Delay 11.23 Intersection LOS B 34 z 7 ' I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425-453-5759 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S 151st St /51st Ave S City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, S15151ex Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak existing Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 151st St North /South Street: 51st Ave S. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T R I Volume 10 0 0 170 0 10 10 1 120 20 110 1 145 0 I % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 83 147 162 J Heavy Veh 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 Geometry group 3b 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rates: Total in Lane 83 147 162 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet 35 z w re 2 J U 0 c o w in J i- 0 w 0 g � w F- _ zF- 1- 0 Z ~ 0 u o1 w w L I:0 w z 0 C F-= O ~ z Left -Turn 73 0 10 Right -Turn 10 21 0 Prop. Left -Turns 0.9 0.0 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 3b 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT -adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT -adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV -adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.0 w. Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time B u� -IU Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound u) o L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 U) LIJ . Flow rate 83 147 162 N 1 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 w 0 x, initial 0.07 0.13 0.14 2 hd, final value 4.63 4.17 4.25 x, final value 0.11 0.17 0.19 co Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 "l �, Service Time 2.6 2.2 2.3 Z 1 wo -- Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service w 20 _ UD o - 0 F- Ill - a l -O w Z U c PI 0 Eastbound E- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 83 147 162 Service Time 2.6 2.2 2.3 Utilization, x 0.11 0.17 0.19 Dep. headway, hd 4.63 4.17 4.25 Capacity 333 397 412 Delay 8.18 8.02 8.25 LOS A A A Approach: Delay 8.18 8.02 8.25 LOS A A A Intersection Delay 8.15 Intersection LOS A 36 z HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425 - 455 -5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425-453-5759 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S 151st St /51st Ave S City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, S15151fu Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/o project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 151st St North /South Street: 51st Ave S. Worksheet 2 - Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 1 Northbound 1 Southbound I L T R I L T R 1 L T R 1 L T R 1 Volume 10 0 0 175 0 10 10 130 20 110 160 0 I % Thrus Left Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 88 157 178 Io Heavy Veh 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 Geometry group 3b 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Flow Rates: Total in Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 88 157 178 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet 37 Lett - I urn /ti 0 10 Right -Turn 10 21 0 Prop. Left -Turns 0.9 0.0 0.1 Prop. Right -Turns 0.1 0.1 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 3b 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT -adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT -adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV -adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 88 157 178 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.08 0.14 0.16 hd, final value 4.69 4.21 4.28 x, final value 0.11 0.18 0.21 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 2.7 2.2 2.3 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 88 157 178 Service Time 2.7 2.2 2.3 Utilization, x 0.11 0.18 0.21 Dep. headway, hd 4.69 4.21 4.28 Capacity 338 407 428 Delay 8.30 8.15 8.42 LOS A A A Approach: Delay 8.30 8.15 8.42 LOS A A A Intersection Delay 8.29 Intersection LOS A 38 Intersection: S 151st St /51st Ave S City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, S15151wp Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/ project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 151st St North /South Street: 51st Ave S. Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Flow Rates: Total in Lane HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Fax: 425-453-5759 ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL(AWSC) ANALYSIS Worksheet 2 • Volume Adjustments and Site Characteristics I Eastbound I Westbound I Northbound I Southbound I L T R I L T R I L T R I L T RI I I I I Volume 10 0 0 195 0 20 10 134 23 150 192 0 I % Thrus Left Lane Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Configuration LTR LTR LTR PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Flow Rate 121 165 254 % Heavy Veh 0 0 0 No. Lanes 1 1 1 Opposing -Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting -lanes 1 1 1 Geometry group 3b 1 1 1 Duration, T 0.25 hrs. Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 121 165 254 Worksheet 3 - Saturation Headway Adjustment Worksheet 39 ,∎:4 . .:r-...:"+.4.6.1;:� r. R!t��:... .' 1L ' %+'Tn�. . V.,VIt .. ryy4.l h:.l'S "« •..� nnw m, ew'.«. w..' 1.? u.. n�J,?:.,: ;.V�.;�1:4'.h�:iJ.y�^:,a.�. -:�� Left -Turn 100 0 52 Right -Turn 21 24 0 Prop. Left -Turns 0.8 0.0 0.2 Prop. Right -Turns 0.2 0.1 0.0 Prop. Heavy Vehicle 0.0 0.0 0.0 Geometry Group 3b 1 1 1 Adjustments Table 10-40: hLT -adj 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 hRT -adj -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 -0.6 hHV -adj 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 hadj, computed 0.0 0.0 0.1 -0.1 0.0 Worksheet 4 - Departure Headway and Service Time Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow rate 121 165 254 hd, initial value 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 3.20 x, initial 0.11 0.15 0.23 hd, final value 4.84 4.38 4.41 x, final value 0.16 0.20 0.31 Move -up time, m 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Service Time 2.8 2.4 2.4 Worksheet 5 - Capacity and Level of Service Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 L1 L2 Flow Rate 121 165 254 Service Time 2.8 2.4 2.4 Utilization, x 0.16 0.20 0.31 Dep. headway, hd 4.84 4.38 4.41 Capacity 371 415 504 Delay 8.77 8.47 9.39 LOS A A A Approach: Delay 8.77 8.47 9.39 LOS A A A Intersection Delay 8.97 Intersection LOS A 40 i ■;;4■;1..-Zat9:.:.:.: %e. oomat .4 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on Analyst: MJJ, klicwbex Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 630 140 165 45 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 663 147 173 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 v (vph) 663 C(m) (vph) 1361 v/c 0.49 95% queue length 2.96 41 .1K. ii x:i.�'. vi: •.•'4;';i:,u.:>y .sl s ., Control Delay 10.1 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs ' z ml- Transportation Planning & Engineering ,f- z 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 6 w -I C.) Bellevue, WA 98004 0 o Phone: 425 - 455 -5320 Fax: 425-453-5759 ai w 1.11 i E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com w0 TWO -WAY STOP,CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS g g ¢ Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on City /State: Tukwila, WA = a Analyst: MJJ, klicwbex F-- i Project No.: T084601 Z F. Time period Analyzed: PM peak, existing w o Date: 1/30/01 ? o East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive o Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 2U Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ii o Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 w z L TR L TR 0w oI Volume 630 140 165 45 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 166 37 43 12 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 663 147 173 47 Percent Heavy Vehicles .0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 42 J: se4: I4r s: Sw%' ,+. -u;Yi� t. , : <. , .' ti: s:::`-•;,•: aY,. ti:< r.'" i".ti:. ryjdeo-�4ti� :- , .+:.+*:4:_S�`'ti z Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 147 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 43 #iSs�lr�ks#idi+�c':�5+ t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3, It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1-stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2-stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 t(f) 2.2 Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9 -2) _a Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q 1 ) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 44 , AMMO p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage 1 Stage 11 p(1) p(4) p(7) p(8) p( p(10) p(11) p(1 Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process - Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ✓ c,x s Px ✓ c,u,x C r,x C plat,x V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) 220 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 45 .NG .^:, d ' - ik?,:?d ".;S"in:. "9 .... �.- ....V.... —.. ._ ... ....... .... ... . }�'- �,. +:�'. P.C�u... .:wsS:.',•u+.'rvN:a.:..vrv: rut W'�M k -yd� W.'TT r;' r�'+'xy.. lotential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 220 Potential Capacity 1361 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1361 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.51 Maj L•Shared Prob Q free St. 0.47 Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 8 11 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.47 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.58 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.58 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two-stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.47 0.58 0.58 Part 1 • First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 193 742 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.47 1.00 Movement Capacity 90 742 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 725 193 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.47 46 MOM Movement Capacity 72b 90 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Fiows Potential Capacity Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.47 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 0.47 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 w w __I = Part 1 - First Stage w 0 C Fiows 2 Potential Capacity 212 842 g .r Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 u_ a Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.47 1.00 = a Movement Capacity 99 842 Z i I- O Part 2 - Second Stage z (— Conflicting Flows 2 m Potential Capacity 842 212 o Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 0 C ap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.47 LLI Movement Capacity 842 99 � ' u O w z — I oI Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.47 0.47 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.58 0.58 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.58 0.58 Movement Capacity 47 z � 6 00 N 0 z volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 663 C(m) (vph) 1361 v/c 0.49 95% queue length 2.96 Control Delay 10.1 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.51 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 147 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P *(oj) 0.47 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.1 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 48 I NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 01 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on Analyst: MJJ, klicwbfu Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive z Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 Z Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 6 2 6= Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 0 Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 U o L T R I L T R w = J H Volume 695 155 180 50 co u_ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 731 163. 189 52 2 o Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- J Median Type Undivided u_ a RT Channelized? I = d Lanes 0 1 1 0 I- w _ Configuration LT TR Z 0 Upstream Signal? No No w o Lij n o Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound o Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 0 L T R IL T R i I- I u. 0 Ili U� h- _ of Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 731 C(m) (vph) 1337 v/c 0.55 95% queue length 3.65 50 + ar, -�_ta E,t 5 . -ijf �.... �: r .. (..4..r• ......< � � ....L : .� �+.z �-.... Ka' ��:L.;!Y_ =�'i.G z Control Delay 10.9 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 z • Mark Jacobs ,i z. Transportation Planning & Engineering m 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 6 v o Bellevue, WA 98004 w (0 w Phone: 425 - 455 -5320 Fax: 425-453-5759 Ili 1 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com to u.. W O TWO -WAY STOP. CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on co Cr City /State: Tukwila, WA w Analyst: MJJ, klicwbfu z ! Project No.: T084601 1- O Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/o project w w Date: 1/30/01 D o East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp o co North /South Street: Klickitat Drive o ♦-- Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 i v Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments u-0 Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 w L TR L TR o z Volume 695 155 180 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 183 41 47 13 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 731 163 189 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 51 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 163 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 52 iti :'1L : s. t(c,g) U.20 0.20 U.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3, It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 1w t(f, base) 2.20 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 v P(HV) 0 c) - o t(f) 2.2 w J F- N Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals w o Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 u) c� V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) E- 2 z �. O . Z LLI I-. 0 O - o I- w u I • O w z U - O H V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9 -2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 53 ';.i! #;�..»i�;:F, w"'! t t� Y% �, �' �. �. 3=:;- L '-!.;:i�''...4L'.?rfY e's' , �• c�, e.; :�:e�,;,arur >ta.+,+:.rx.�;�,,N. ,r: z w p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 . p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(1) p(4) p(7) p(8) P(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) 241 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 54 uielllldl'.dpouiLy Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 241 Potential Capacity 1337 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1337 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.45 Maj L•Shared Prob Q free St. 0.40 Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 8 11 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 7 10 1.00 0.40 0.52 0.52 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.40 0.52 0.52 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 162 729 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.40 1.00 Movement Capacity 64 729 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 710 162 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.40 ;Y= �tih''.<t�F.' �!A, t�, t��. U.,:.:.. 4` .:- t- r'i•.;�l::ii:e:ie:.ii.hk`: Iviovement Uapacity Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. /lU 04 1.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 1.00 0,40 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 179 826 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.40 1.00 Movement Capacity 71 826 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 826 179 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.40 Movement Capacity 826 71 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.40 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.52 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.52 Movement Capacity Results for Two stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.40 0.52 0.52 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R or:: 'rfi a y. w* w �. i�_: �%.. �1��> L�: J;.` �F?1�i ::i:Y#t.,'•;�l•:rN'S?;xL'!'32 5�.er� -.xh.. .,w volume (vpn) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT v (vph) 731 C(m) (vph) 1337 v/c 0.55 95% queue length 3.65 Control Delay 10.9 LOS 6 Approach Delay Approach LOS Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.45 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 163 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P *(oj) 0.40 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.9 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 57 .. as '.,::21:.:�..........r...�...._ .. _. co NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. C C OMNI HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on Analyst: MJJ, klicwbwp Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 695 162 219 63 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 731 170 , 230 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 v (vph) 731 C(m) (vph) 1277 v/c 0.57 95% queue length 3.97 ISSIMMIMMEMENEM .3 A fi ✓ 4;:.;LI� � �S tiT:.Gr, "�tii ;i:� +'fi y .,YY.,`.e S:4s> 59 Uontrol Uelay 11.5 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs z Transportation Planning & Engineering = 1— w. 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 .I— w c4 m Bellevue, WA 98004 6 m Phone: 425. 455.5320 Fax: 425. 453.5759 0 0 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com w w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS cn u- w 0 Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 on g 5 City /State: Tukwila, WA u_ Q Analyst: MJJ, klicwbwp u) d Project No.: TO84601 H w Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/ project = Date: 1/30/01 F- 0 East /West Street: SR 518 WB on -ramp w w North /South Street: Klickitat Drive 2 Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 0 0 o1- Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments w w. Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 i = .. o. L T R L T R LL-p Volume 695 162 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 183 43 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 731 170 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal? No No Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 219 63 0.95 0.95 58 17 230 66 Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 60 4:51*.1 a ��:��:rs' ,l -'ins. .✓.i #_G"��% _.L;�:S: •T;"�_ . •L' ■ � ;' w z U � 0 z GUM 1 —J 1 IUUI ly 1 IUVV1 cae, 1111% Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments z Movements 13 14 15 16 ; z w Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 6 v . Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 C.) 0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 co 0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 co i co w w Upstream Signal Data M Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance g Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal u vph vph sec sec mph feet H w z� t— O z i— S2 Left•Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through III ELI U � O D H Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles c ~ O w z o 0 Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 170 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4-Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 61 j:4 z t(c,g) U.2U U.2U U.1U U.2U U.20 U.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R ¢ 11 - . �E- w O. U N O w= J Worksheet 5-Effect of Upstream Signals w w Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal g Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) = a � z = zI w U O L t(f,base) 2.20 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 t(f) 2.2 V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9 -2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 62 .. z w U 0 z l-)V) U.000 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) �.. Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P( p(4) p( p( p(9) P( p(11) p( Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x 296 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 63 V ICI llldl liclpdLl ly Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 296 Potential Capacity 1277 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1277 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.43 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 0.36 Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmrit Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.36 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.49 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.49 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 8 11 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 7 10 8 11 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.36 0.49 0.49 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 161 694 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.36 1.00 Movement Capacity 59 694 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 672 161 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.36 64 �.... z : ,k.r rk� kl .i� „S._„ i $ .n S;�c:y e :nt''J:iil!Y`.i "."x M:: i•:+. iLti2± ri�aLTf' ?d. iY.fii5l3,�.�'ra.�'.vai5�7h`Pt� Ivlovement Uapacity 6/2 59 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Step 4: LT from Minor St. Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.36 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 177 786 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.36 1.00 Movement Capacity 64 786 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 786 177 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.36 Movement Capacity 786 64 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.36 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.49 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.49 Movement Capacity Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct 1.00 0.36 0.49 0.49 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 0.36 65 r VIUI l IL � N � Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) C sep z Volume Z Delay ui Qsep ce 2 Qsep +1 �o. round (Qsep +1) cn o . J = 1- U) u iii 0 2 < co D I I _ w Worksheet 10 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service z zI- w uj 2 U O v (vph) 731 '0 C(m) (vph) 1277 w uj " i v/c 0.57 F � ? 95% queue length 3.97 u- p Control Delay 11.5 iii z — LOS B v w' Approach Delay o H - A p proach LOS Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.43 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 170 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P *(oj) 0.36 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.5 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 z 01 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off Analyst: MJJ, klicebex Project No.: TO84601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 EB off -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Z , = z CL 6 QQ � JU 0 0 Volume 740 165 W i Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 778 173 co u . Percent Heavy Vehicles w 0 Median Type Undivided 2 RT Channelized. ' Lanes 1 1 co d Co T T z w Upstream Signal? No No Z z F-- O Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound w I- Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 2 n . ...a, L T R L T R v o . f OD- Volume 25 490 a H Ill a ' — i Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 26 515 = U Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 a P P Grade (%) 0 0 z - -, Median Storage 1 v c. Flared Approach: Exists? p Y. Storage Z Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R NOON HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I L R v (vph) 26 515 C(m) (vph) 291 876 v/c 0.09 0.59 95% queue length 0.21 4.03 68 k.,ontroi uetay 1o.0 14.0 LOS C B Approach Delay 15.0 - Approach LOS B HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs z Transportation Planning & Engineering = t= 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 ill Bellevue, WA 98004 v 0 0 Phone: 425.455 -5320 Fax: 425-453-5759 0 0 . E-Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com w w TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS co w w0 Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off g i City /State: Tukwila, WA w Analyst: MJJ, klicebex co m Project No.: T084601 H w - Time period Analyzed: PM peak, existing z �I Date: 1/30/01 z O E a s t /West Street: SR 518 EB off ramp w w North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 0 � `. O —' Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments = Ill w ' Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R u- H O Volume 740 165 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 195 43 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 778 173 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 25 490 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 7 129 69 w O ~ z hourly How mate, hl Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Lb 010 0 0 0 0 1 1 L R No z Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 w c4 2 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 6= Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 0 0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 u) w Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 j co w w 0 Upstream Signal Data 2 Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal cn d vph vph sec sec mph feet I w z = I— O z i- w O • 1— W — Worksheet 3-Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles • v . u" O w z U � O S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 70 pow ♦V 15) V .r_V V . V .a V V .g_ V V r_ V V.1 V Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.4 6.2 2 -stage 5.4 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R z = H t(f,base) 3.50 3.30 , E - w . t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 W 2 ` �, P(HV) 0 0 t(f) 3.5 3.3 0 0 cn w w 2 : J 1- Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals u) w w Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 g 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) co a I I zI._ t- O z F- V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9-2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 1 H 1 Movement 2 Movement 5 z V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 71 PV) v.000 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(1) p(4) p(7) p( p(9) p(10) p(11) p(12) z =1— �w. 6 00 CO J = H CO u_ w Computation 4 and 5 - Single•Stage Process u. Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 c a L L L T R L T R F_ Z �. ✓ c,x 951 173 z 0 S � ? Px ✓ c,u,x 0 0 O I— C r,x w w C plat,x • 2 0 . Two-Stage Process tii z 7 8 10 11 U = Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 • E V(c,x) 173 778 s 1700 P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 173 72 z IOW rotentiai capacity ts Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 876 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.41 Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 4 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows 951 Potential Capacity 291 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.41 1.00 Movement Capacity 291 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 1.00 1.00 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 410 760 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 410 760 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 760 410 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 73 'jet 3 i:27: ::+- -L"L: ......;r _ `• 0: .. . } ivIUVCI I WI ll l dpdUlly /UV L+ Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 173 Potential Capacity 456 862 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 456 862 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 778 Potential Capacity 660 456 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.41 1.00 ,. Movement Capacity 272 456 Part 3 • Single Stage Conflicting Flows 951 Potential Capacity 291 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.41 1.00 Movement Capacity 291 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 C t 291 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 1.00 74 • '. ;.�..�..e. .,?V .. .. vUIUIIIC k . J1 :J Movement Capacity (vph) 291 876 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep 291 876 z Volume 26 515 Delay ~ w Q sep Q sep + 1 _1 0 round (Qsep +1) U O co w = F- n max C sh SUM C sep n C act wO g ¢ = a I- In Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service z 1 — O . Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 w Lane Config L R M 0 O -. CD H w W LLO v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 26 515 291 876 0.09 0.59 0.21 4.03 18.6 14.8 C B 15.0• B Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 1.00 v(iI), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P *(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 75 w z -I O ~ z • C) L NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR - THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off Analyst: MJJ, klicebfu Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 EB off -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 z Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments jF' w Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 6 = Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 U L T R I L T R 0 co 0 w = -II- Volume 815 180 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 857 189 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? No No N O. 2 LL a d • � z = F-- 1 0 Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound w w Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R 0 0 o Lu I I-- Volume 30 540 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 31 568 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R _,. Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound } Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I I L R v (vph) 31 568 C(m) (vph) 255 858 v/c 0.12 0.66 95% queue length 0.36 5.14 77 z w. LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ■VI Ill ,, UV L.1 .1 1 / .V C C 17.2 C HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455 -5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, klicebfu Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/o project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 EB off-ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 815 180 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 214 47 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 857 189 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 30 540 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 8 142 78 f.n.1:4,'. I1/.7:,.... 11 'S :`:.:G.•.w: /"..L.`ip,..:.:, ti , y� : .:�i. y .�t �n'� c:$itLsdYJ •S"�.,�, : a: hourly rlow male, hrm i1 006 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 79 ..:5�: >• "N i�� � .n.iX7n. :�w�«.N'�(� � . -t yl'..: '4 PAM Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals N 0 wO Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal g 5 Movement 2 Movement 5 u- j V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) = a F_ w V grog z� I Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (v z O Arrival Type W Effective Green, g (sec) D o Cycle Length, C (sec) 0 N Rp (from table 9 -2) a ! Proportion vehicles arriving on green P = W g(q 1 ) E- H .. I g(q L I O g(q) ui 0 U = O~ LkL,g) U.GU U.GU U. 1U U.GU U.GU U. 1 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.4 6.2 2 -stage 5.4 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R z =1- t(f,base) 3.50 3.30 Lu t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 -J 0 t(f) 3.5 3.3 u) o Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 80 p4:+i.�'.0 �.uair "� .1?l! Y _ Yi.M.w.... •_ _ .. . J I ' H z • ~ Vo,x 1046 189 . ° v o,u,% Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 } Stmoel Stage2 Gtagel Stage2 Stmoel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 — ~ V(c,x) 1E9 857 | o 1700 \ _^ P(x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) NV.) u.■uu p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) ( for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(4) p(8) 1 p(10) p(11) p(12) Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R C r,x C plat,x Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 189 81 v u.I 111u1 vu Nul..I ly Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmrit Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 4 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 858 0.34 1.00 1.00 7 10 8 11 1.00 1.00 Conflicting Flows 1046 Potential Capacity 255 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.34 1.00 Movement Capacity 255 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 377 748 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 377 748 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 748 377 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 82 ti.: •yy�.aw •. 1+f ✓.. rv.r. � { M: �.:::. t: � �:.. ��, n.<. �:. �t' r. 1. '' -1.w.x:- r.:M..S4v..6.�Yb -�i� . � .. w.. u. �« �+ i6. �+ an..+ 1< ewa./ n• ry +i+i.M.�irr,'4J{..rtindrj.ea4s�. ,'nwne.u.r_.ra ter.; n:ysa:. y�C :eti�< n.rd�i:nri ;v „.r+:d•i:.l Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 { y 0.00 0.00 C t 255 IvIVVCI I ICI II 1Lc1pclUl ly Part 3 • Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 • First Stage Conflicting Flows 189 Potential Capacity 419 848 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 419 848 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 857 Potential Capacity 631 419 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.34 1.00 Movement Capacity 213 419 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1046 Potential Capacity 255 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.34 1.00 Movement Capacity 255 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations /'h0 / / 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 1.00 83 w- i.",."' +...a�•......:.,�. ,�ry,',:::.v,ya w. .ai..�i.Yk;:tii.':..<<:a..awx::: W4 ' . _J volume (vpn) Jl bbt5 Movement Capacity (vph) 255 858 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep 255 858 Volume 31 568 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act w 0 w= J i- Q L L W 2 gQ E/2 I w Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service z I.. I- O Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 w F-- Lane Config L R w 0 0. O - o I- w W U ' W Z O I— z v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 31 568 255 858 0.12 0.66 0.36 5.14 21.1 17.0 C C 17.2 C Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P *(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 84 z 2 6 0 O 4 I NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off Analyst: MJJ, klicebwp Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR 518 EB off-ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 z Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments ;H w Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound re 2 Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 _, v L T R I L T R U0 co 0 Volume 820 219 w _ Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 863 230 ~ U) u. Percent Heavy Vehicles •• w 0 Median Type Undivided 2 RT Channelized. ' Lanes 1 1 co a Configuration T T I w Upstream Signal? No No = E- 0 Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound w I- Movement 7 8• 9 I 10 11 12 2 D 7 L T R I L T R D0 0 _ Volume 32 540 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 33 568 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config 1 1 L R v (vph) 33 568 C(m) (vph) 239 814 v/c 0.14 0.70 95% queue length 0.43 5.74 86 Zu;.rr..G�..., >& .31rf' ). ; •:kjYvi„ .v ,�; j ..�� , • w w ui z N 0 z control Uelay ZZ.5 19.0 LOS C C Approach Delay 19.2 Approach LOS C HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs z • Transportation Planning & Engineering = 1 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 w; Bellevue, WA 98004 0 0 Phone: 425-455-5320 Fax: 425. 453.5759 0 0 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com w w ...1 u, w 0 Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 518 off g City /State: Tukwila, WA u_ Analyst: MJJ, klicebwp N Project No.: T084601 H w . Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/ project z Date: 1/30/01 F- 0 East /West Street: SR 518 EB off -ramp w w North /South Street: Klickitat Drive 2 m Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 0 N O O '— Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments w w Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 H L T R L T R �-0 TWO -WAY STOP ANALYSIS Volume 820 219 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 216 58 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 863 230 Percent Heavy Vehicles Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 32 540 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 8 142 87 .. w z • 2 0H z. Hourly How Kate, Hl-K bb 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 ' w Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 v Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 c) 0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 co w Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 w i 2w w 0 . Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance u Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal c d vph vph sec sec mph feet F._ _ zI.- 1-0 z t— w U • a O n: w w I- V u. O . z w — • I O ~ z S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.1 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 88 z z ... I Z t(f,base) 3.50 3.30 cc w: t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 6 = P(HV) 0 0 t(f) 3.5 3.3 N 0 V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type 1.11 w Effective Green, g (sec) n 0 Cycle Length, C (sec) 0 - Rp (from table 9.2) 0 1-- Proportion vehicles arriving on green P w w g(q1) g(q2) z g(q) w o � 1.0;,8) U.LU U.LU U. 1U U.LU U.LU U. 1U Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.4 6.2 2 -stage 5.4 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Worksheet 5- Effect of' Upstream Signals w p w Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal g J Movement 2 Movement 5 u- V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) = a � Z' z � I- O z i- Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 89 w i J z PKz) U.uUU \ 1 0.000 . : ^ p(dom) o�oubn� : --, Constrained or unconstrained? . p(subo) unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single-stage Two-Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II ~~ m i Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R Vo.x 1093 230 s Px V c,u,x C [,X C plat,x Two-Stage Process 7 {} 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 230 863 � 1700 P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 230 90 I UICIIIIdI l,apolaly 014 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 814 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.30 Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 1.00 1.00 Conflicting Flows 1093 Potential Capacity 239 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.30 1.00 Movement Capacity 239 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 374 718 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 374 718 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 718 374 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 91 ivivvt I ielIL Ucycn.iLy Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 1.00 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 1.00 1.00 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 230 Potential Capacity 416 813 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 416 813 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 863 Potential Capacity 605 416 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.30 1.00 Movement Capacity 183 416 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1093 Potential Capacity 239 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.30 1.00 Movement Capacity 239 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 C t 239 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 92 vUIUIIIC t,vply JJ JUU Movement Capacity (vph) 239 814 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep 239 814 Volume 33 568 Delay w Qsep 6j Qsep +1 vvo round (Qsep +1) o. w w 0 J ?. I a = w Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service z H. I 0 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 w w` Lane Config L R 2 o O cn, 0 F- wW 2 0. w z w U = O ~: n max C sh SUM C sep n C act v (vph) C(m) (vph) v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 33 568 239 814 0.14 0.70 0.43 5.74 22.5 19.0 C C 19.2 C Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P *(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 93 z CO NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. MOO HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5e Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR SB on-ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 . iz Vehicle Volumes and cle Volumes re Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound 6 D Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 00 L T R IL T R co Li, = Volume 870 415 40 790 co o Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 915 436 42 831 w Percent Heavy Vehicles •- -- . 0 .. 2 Median Type Undivided u_ a RT Channelized? No (/) a Lanes 1 1 1 1 I- i Configuration T R L T z f- Upstream Signal? No No z o wW Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound v o Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 0 i L T R I L T R °I-- 111 L u- w z 0 = OH Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 42 C(m) (vph) 516 v/c 0.08 95% queue length 0.18 95 `414.0 44.1" nJn'astnc:tnsi*.r' ANatialast.afteb �_�• =� . L-"'a`'' . " ^'t^ '"i z I�VItLIUI L Idy LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs ' _ I-: Transportation Planning & Engineering it- w 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 2 . JU Bellevue, WA 98004 U o' Phone: 425.455.5320 Fax: 425.453 -5759 tn w E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com -J F- w TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS 2 Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on City /State: Tukwila, WA = 0 Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5e I' _ Project No.: T084601 z F" Time period Analyzed: PM peak, existing z o Date: 1/30/01 ? o East /West Street: SR SB on -ramp U North /South Street: Klickitat Drive o D Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 w = w U Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments u o Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ili z L T R L T R �_ . 0I Volume 870 415 40 790 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 229 109 11 208 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 915 436 42 831 Percent Heavy Vehicles -• 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 96 z Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 97 l.L,8) U.GU U.GU U.lU U.GU U.GU U.lu Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 z LL L T R L T R i Z W t(f,base) 2.20 re 2 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 UO P(HV) 0 co 0 t(f) 2.2 w = J f- Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals WO g Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal • n Movement 2 Movement 5 d V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) Z = F-. w � no U O N • f- w • w . u w z U N O V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9 -2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q1) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 98 ...u.e.jr•s:lusSetl:�l.4tfrf�.e .. 51�.,'u1.s4t4UyJ�'. Lv.ti�.,iS�imu2n,�.i+w,,*.vt te. }�.ir,, %S;w '��,w:u zm'r .. :.a�rn�i�..tMjaativ z Nl ) 1.) 1.) p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) • Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process p(1) p(4) p( p( p(9) p(10) p(11) p( movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II � z cc w J 0 (r) o: CO = • O w Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process = Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I- i L L L T R L T R ZI I- O z I- w O � al- ✓ c,x S Px ✓ c,u,x C r,x C plat,x 1351 w -o w z U - . Two -Stage Process 1.= 7 8 10 11 z Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) S P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 99 nab -.+:4 V.� -'�*✓. pas AIFOO Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 1351 Potential Capacity 516 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 516 Probability of Queue free St. 0.92 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 8 11 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.92 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.94 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.94 Movement Capacity 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.94 0.94 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 354 354 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.92 Movement Capacity 354 325 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 354 221 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 1.00 100 ... Movement Capacity 325 221 Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. Part 3 Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Step 4: LT from Minor St. 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 394 394 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.92 Movement Capacity 394 362 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 394 310 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 1.00 Movement Capacity 362 310 Part 3 . Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1.00 0.92 0.94 0.94 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.92 0.94 0.94 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 0.92 101 i��r <�':�, „ _._'. c���� `;:.���:SV:�,s�;�M: ass': �; 1:".u'.:kew�,:..,;,r�; "ik::..•w N6 Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Qsep Qsep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement Lane Config v (vph) 42 C(m) (vph) 516 v/c 0.08 95% queue length 0.18 Control Delay 12.6 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 0.92 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P *(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 12.6 102 ,=Auf .i;+s5mas.'K:i =:t ie ?Fiti`. ''rj ,'tx!�:,i!�n »'•:i= s;�f?:H �,y 47's+'. ;i it`tt+'�ii+ %3'eK•`.'ti n+i' «'dG2+id'riuti �'+CtiM'.'Ebxt L. 0 Cr3 L. .1 L.. 1...J • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. tvni J HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5f Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR SB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 960 460 45 870 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1010 484 47 915 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 47 C(m) (vph) 455 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.29 104 W.+9 Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS B 13.8 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425 - 455 -5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425-453-5759 TWO -WAY STOP .CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5 Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/o project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR SB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 960 460 45 870 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 253 121 12 229 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1010 484 47 915 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 105 :.._.. }. F ,:... f � .:r i1�A�',"Yrt � ;b� k� n... ^'. Oii $!,�. �.% i. 4K3', L' :it.N.,d�,ct.4t'�i�ad.::�,w' -�+ oaf'' lYUiii2:VL�+.e:s�e,�_�.s_..; ". z _I- w 6 J U O u) cn w J H � L w �. • ¢ = ci • • _ z � I-0 Z I— w w U � O - O H w 0 ..z U= O I z F— .. Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration z Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments ce w Movements 13 14 15 16 0 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 in 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 w = Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 -' Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 W 0 § a Upstream Signal Data N Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance = w Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal Z vph vph sec sec mph feet 1— 0 z w w . 0 O • 2 O H I U LI--O Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles 111 U =. O ~ S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 106 a. nw +- .... • z KIM t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 z L L L T R L T R =� w t(f,base) 2.20 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 -J o P(HV) 0 co 0 t(f) 2.2 w = J H U) u_ w o Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals L L. J Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 z w V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) Z I- o z t- w • w 0 o - O I- w W I U I- LL o • z `do H o 1- V prog Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) Arrival Type Effective Green, g (sec) Cycle Length, C (sec) Rp (from table 9 -2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P g(q 1 ) g(q g(q) Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 K. ; •. v 4 �•� L .'tJ`_ri : 7P' sar. ptir�jjd�:+. �": i J'+? 1;: 4,a 3r;!:i'15,�5L�`.SYftad� 107 z flaft V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II P(1) p(4) P( p( p(9) p(10) p(11) p( Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 1494 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 108 s ._� cr..J..nw•�x.?.YU aria �.. �. P. ..tt.�l cy,Hs'Sh•'t27r*�(34x'+l A �'oathmr , t+ �i�; �+ �gti� ,�.ktitsm]�.�ms..Yt..�.Fvi'.dl+ Hotential Capacity SIM Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. • Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 1494 Potential Capacity 455 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 455 Probability of Queue free St. 0.90 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 8 11 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.92 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 Movement Capacity 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 0.92 0.92 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 320 320 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.90 Movement Capacity 320 287 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 320 188 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 1.00 109 ` c:;«-.,., a}.: �:: i iw' Cwtfi. v.! NwN. fiYC�Hl Yk is:: ��,$ �. w: twwh}. �: 4" w:�r�+"s'w.i«J,n+r"w'.u'v4c.a�i Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 287 188 1.00 0.90 Result for 2 stage process: z a 0.00 0.00 = z y 0.00 0.00 Lu Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 _1 o co o Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 J = F- Part 1 - First Stage w 0 Conflicting Flows 2 Potential Capacity 355 355 g a Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 u Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.90 'I W Movement Capacity 355 318 z = I— F- O Part 2 - Second Stage w F- Conflicting Flows 2 D Potential Capacity 355 272 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 0 l-- Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.90 1.00 w w Movement Capacity 318 272 1 LI o w z 0 O F— z Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.90 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.92 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.92 Movement Capacity Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.90 0.92 0.92 110 Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9-Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n C act Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement Lane Config v (vph) 47 C(m) (vph) 455 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.29 Control Delay 13.8 LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay P(0i) 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P*(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes Movement 2 Movement 5 0.90 13.8 111 L... LA J L.1.1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT- CD -I' CD 3 N.) North /South Street: Klickitat Drive z • Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 i w Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 6 n Major Street: Approach Northbound Southbound o o Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 co o L T R I L T R wi F." F- Volume 965 460 65 889 W o Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1015 484 68 935 2 . Percent Heavy Vehicles -- 0 -- g a Median Type Undivided cn a . RT Channelized? No -1 w Lanes 1 1 1 1 z HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5w Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR SB on -ramp Configuration T R L T Z o Upstream Signal? No No w Minor Street: Approach Westbound Eastbound 8 Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 0 L T R I L T R w Volume L-- z Hourly Flow Rate, HFR w Z Percent Heavy Vehicles - i Percent Grade (%) 0 0 z ~ Median Storage 1 i Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 68 C(m) (vph) 453 v/c 0.15 95% queue length 0.53 113 Ira Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS ` - : Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 2223 112th Avenue N.E. Suite 101 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 965 460 65 889 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 254 121 17 234 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1015 484 68 935 Percent Heavy Vehicles •- -- 0 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration T R L T Upstream Signal? No No B Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak -15 Minute Volume 14.3 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425-453-5759 TWO -WAY STOP.CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: Klickitat Drive /SR 5 SB on City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, klicsb5w Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: PM peak, 2006 w/ project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: SR SB on -ramp North /South Street: Klickitat Drive Intersection Orientation: NS Study period (hrs): 0.25 Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 114 • Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left -Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 115 P. t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 2 -stage 4.1 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 z L L L T R L T R 1F- z t(f,base) 2.20 "as' t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 vi t(f) 2.2 w = u LL w Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals. 2 Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal w Movement 2 Movement 5 I w V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) z � 0 V prog w w Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) w Arrival Type 0 U, Effective Green, g (sec) o �_ Cycle Length, C (sec) w w Rp (from table 9 -2) Proportion vehicles arriving on green P - 0 g(q1) v czn. g(q o � . g(q) z OVA _j alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.000 116 • p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II • �z � w u6= 00 U) 0 III J H, w w o Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process z Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 z L L L T R L T R i•-•0 z V c,x 1499 U o Px o V c,u,x w w . U ; C r,x 4 0 C plat,x tii z U = 0 z p(1) p(4) p(7) p(8) p( p(10) p(11) p(12) Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. Conflicting Flows 9 12 117 Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 1.00 1.00 4 1 1499 453 1.00 453, 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 8 11 1.00 1.00 7 10 1.00 1.00 0.85 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.85 0.85 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.88 0.88 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.88 0.88 Movement Capacity Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 318 300 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.85 Movement Capacity 318 255 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 300 187 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.85 1.00 118 • ..:.wo... ∎!s. «.:» i*.i tAx:ig:F;ii i asvak +,(44.14 itiVA 4 2 Fw.t Movement Capacity 255 187 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Result for 2 stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 353 332 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.85 Movement Capacity 353 282 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 332 270 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.85 1.00 Movement Capacity 282 270 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.85 7 10 1.00 0.85 0.88 0.88 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.88 0.88 119 z • z ce w QQ 2 J O 0 CO ❑ • LLI J = w O g Q = d Z F-- 0 Z ~ U • ❑ 0- ❑E- wW O w z' O � O z • Volume (vph) Movement Capacity (vph) Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ' L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n Cact Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement Lane Config L v (vph) 68 C(m) (vph) 453 v/c 0.15 95% queue length 0.53 Control Delay 14.3 LOS B Approach Delay Approach LOS 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 0.85 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P *(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 14.3 120 .. r. , r.. , «.... vim. ��a �` rJ.•1" r,+1 +.� 9 YG�.nt x .. wspi +�+Nh Ic•.x�<r. -..<ar ;t wfvS'!a'r- <v ,.±rb:n I !, LJ I 1---i L. 1 LJ I I LJ LJ 1 J N3 r NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 1_1 w Volume 75 0 30 Z 0 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 78 0 31 W w Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 U 0 Median Storage 1 0 � ! Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage = W RT Channelized? I— 0 Lanes 0 1 0 u_ p Configuration LTR W Z U P - Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service 0 Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Z Movement 1 4 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 I LTR HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. Analyst: MJJ, s15452ex Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments z Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound = Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R e46_ Volume 10 375 825 90 _1 0 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 394 868 94 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- co W Median Type Undivided W i RT Channelized? No J I ' co Lanes 0 1 1 1 u " Lu Configuration LT T .R Upstream Signal? No Yes � ¢ 5 Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound u) Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 H W L T R I L T R = Z I... v (vph) 10 109 C(m) (vph) 653 182 v/c 0.02 0.60 95% queue length 0.00 2.96 Control Delay 10.6 50.6 LOS B F Approach Delay 50.6 Approach LOS F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 122 ..J LLt�J 11LL11,IV1-711u, ■Ullli 1V1 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425.455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, s15452ex Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: existing Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 z a re w 6 m JU Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments u) O p. Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 to w L T R L T R -J 0w Volume 10 375 825 90 w O Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 • 0.95 0.95 M Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 99 217 24 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 394 868 94 L Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- •- a . Median Type Undivided = w RT Channelized? No z H. Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T R Z O , Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 U O D- o F- wW U u' O w Z U = O~ L T R L T R Volume 75 0 30 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 20 0 8 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 78 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped/hr) 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 123 n "�rc.::tif5 a'tir;:+.F :5it4cr�ce ';SriRx'nYiSx1:7 A•,; i�;: t�. iix_ S'_ da+ lr SY. tNfi. .r'ne`m'�,'srii:ii'!Jitr.�Vtiti�is z S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left-Turn 20 1700 3 12 120 35 300 Through 680 1700 3 31 120 35 300 Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 394 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 z 2 H' `~ w Ce g ❑ . J0 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation w 0 co 11.1 Critical Gap Calculation _i H Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 co u_ L L L T R L T R w 0 . t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 g Q t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 U. P(hv) 0 0 0 0 c d t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 F w Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 z = t(3,It) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 - 0 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Z 0 Z 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 UJ t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 D ❑ 2 -stage 4.1 5.4 5.5 6.2 r3 E_ w W I I- U LL'O z Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(l,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 680 20 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 12 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9-2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.100 g(q 1) 35.6 1.3 g(q2) 23.7 0.0 g(q) 59.3 1.3 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 124 .,<, .. r�,.2 he7 ✓ >...o-.; �+=o;s Sisr; ?a r� ':i:;::r ' "�t��'ct' f .+i '� ^. - � � - �. .`......1.- .......- _:..r.. 7 ... .' .....: .:l : i .. rr2. +Y'tl�..P..:,:, , . .., .:r w U= 0 z p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.464 p(dom) 0.464 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? IVIU v VI i• w rya...., i. .. V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha 0.550 beta 0.645 Travel time, t(a) (sec) 5.831 Smoothing Factor, F 0.326 Proportion of conflicting flow, f 0.707 0.021 Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1202 14 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1000 1000 Duration of blocked period, t(p) 55.6 0.0 Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.464 Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result U Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two - Stage-Process ,w4 movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II -i p(1) 0.536 p(4) P( P( P( p(10) 0.536 0.000 0.000 p(11) 0.536 0.000 0.000 p(12) 0.536 Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 972 1302 1302 888 s 1700 1700 1700 1700 Px 0.536 0.536 0.536 0.536 V c,u,x 343 958 958 186 C r,x 1227 288 259 861 C plat,x 658 154 139 462 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 878 424 878 424 s 1700 1700 1700 1700 P(x) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 V(c,u,x) 0 0 0 0 C(r,x) 1029 1029 900 900 C(plat,x) 0 0 0 0 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 125 Conflicting Flows 888 Potential Capacity 462 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 454 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.93 Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 972 Potential Capacity 658 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 653 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 0.98 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 4 1 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1302 Potential Capacity 139 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity 134 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1302 Potential Capacity 154 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.96 Movement Capacity 147 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 878 Potential Capacity 0 0 ',f Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue free St. 0.00 0.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 424 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 0.99 0.97 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1302 Potential Capacity 139 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity 134 126 r • • T rte, I . nada I %eZUIL IUI [. td6o pi U■.GJJ. a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 C t 134 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 878 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 424 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Results for Two-stage process: a y Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 147 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 1.00 147 134 454 78 0 31 182 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.00 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows • 1302 Potential Capacity 154 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.96 Movement Capacity 147 Volume (vph) 78 0 31 Movement Capacity (vph) 147 134 454 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 182 Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 127 v (vph) 10 109 C(m) (vph) 653 182 v/c 0.02 0.60 95% queue length 0.00 2.96 Control Delay 10.6 50.6 LOS B F , ; Approach Delay 50.6 Approach LOS F V u�.t Worksheet 10•Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 394 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 Px(oj) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 10.6 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.2 128 • 1414 -.1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. Analyst: MJJ, s15452fu Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 10 415 910 100 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 436 957 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T .R Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 85 0 35 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 89 0 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I I LTR v (vph) 10 125 C(m) (vph) 567 129 v/c 0.02 0.97 95% queue length 0.00 5.47 --; Control Delay 11.5 136.5 LOS B F Approach Delay 136.5 Approach LOS F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 129 �._�.. ..14 .....�. -._ .. _. Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, s15452fu Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: 2006 w/o project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South 4 W Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 U Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0 0 co Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R � Volume 10 415 910 100 N LL O Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 0.95 2 Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 109 239 26 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 436 957 105 u_ 5 - Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 •• -• c a Median Type Undivided _ RT Channelized? No F- _ Lanes 0 1 1 1 Z '— Configuration LT T R 1- 0 Upstream Signal? No Yes W w U� O2 off WW 1 2.0 U - O z Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 85 0 35 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 22 0 9 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 89 0 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Fax: 425. 453.5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 130 raw S2 Left -Turn Through S5 Left-Turn 20 1700 3 12 120 35 300 Through 750 1700 3 31 120 35 300 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 436 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2 -stage 4.1 5.4 5.5 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 750 20 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 12 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9.2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.100 g(q 1) 39.3 1.3 g(q2) 31.0 0.0 g(q) 70.3 1.3 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 131 D94 pas :s awe alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.555 p(dom) 0.555 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single -stage movements, p(x) Process p(1) p(4) p(7) P( P( p(10) p(11) p(12) 0.445 0.445 0.445 0.445 Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x 572 V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) --' C(r,x) C(plat,x) 1072 1700 0.445 288 1286 IYIV YVIIIVIIt L .IVY•.111V1.• ./ V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) 0.000 0.000 U 0.000 0.550 0.645 5.831 0.326 0.706 0.019 1201 13 1000 1000 66.6 0.0 0.555 (2) (3) Two -Stage Process Stage I Stage II 0.000 0.000 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 967 466 967 466 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0 0 0 1029 1029 900 900 0 0 0 0 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 1433 1433 977 1700 1700 1700 0.445 0.445 0.445 1100 1100 74 237 214 993 105 95 442 132 Z ce ~ 6 UO U _ F-- u_ w 2 LL d . = W Z � I- O Z I— W U� O — .. o 1-- 2 • U — O W U= F. z rte, . L1 t Step 4: LT from Minor St. .. ...,. a. 1 \, 1,54111 .....154. ••. r Conflicting Flows 977 Potential Capacity 442 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 435 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.92 Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 1072 Potential Capacity 572 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 567 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 0.98 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 4 1 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1433 Potential Capacity 95 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity . 91 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1433 Potential Capacity 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.95 Movement Capacity 100 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue free St. 0.00 0.00 Part 2 - Second Stage �� Conflicting Flows 466 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 „_, Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1433 Potential Capacity 95 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 91 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 133 a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 466 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1433 Potential Capacity 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.95 Movement Capacity 100 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 y 0.00 Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 89 0 36 Movement Capacity (vph) 100 91 435 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 129 Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 1.00 7 10 0.00 0.00 100 129 1.00 100 91 435 89 0 36 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.00 134 PISA uv • Worksheet 10•Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT LTR v (vph) 10 125 C(m) (vph) 567 129 v/c 0.02 0.97 95% queue length 0.00 5.47 Control Delay 11.5 136.5 LOS B F Approach Delay 136.5 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 0.98 1.00 v(iI), Volume for stream 2 or 5 436 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 P *(o j) 0.98 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.5 N, Number of major street through lanes 1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.3 135 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. Analyst: MJJ, s15452wp Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 11 415 910 107 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T . R Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 143 0 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 150 0 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT 1 1 LTR v (vph) 11 194 C(m) (vph) 561 121 v/c 0.02 1.60 95% queue length 0.00 12.20 Control Delay 11.5 370.2 LOS B F Approach Delay 370.2 Approach LOS F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 136 Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, s15452wp Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: 2006 w/ project Z "" Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street = F" North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South c w Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 J Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments 0 0 Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R w H. Volume 11 415 910 107 N w Ili O Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 109 239 28 g Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 u_ Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 n Median Type Undivided = RT Channelized? No F- w Lanes 0 1 1 1 ? Configuration LT T R Z O Upstream Signal? No Yes w • w Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 U 0 OS O 1- w 1— • U ' • O W Z U �. H= O H. • Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425 - 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com L T R L T R Volume Peak Hour Factor, PHF Peak-15 Minute Volume Hourly Flow Rate, HFR Percent Heavy Vehicles Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Flow (ped /hr) 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS 143 0 42 0.95 0.95 0.95 38 0 11 150 0 44 0 0 0 0 0 No Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 137 Z r.a+a S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left -Turn 20 1700 3 12 120 35 300 Through 754 1700 3 31 120 35 300 Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 436 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R w t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 ;.,4 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2 -stage 4.1 5.4 5.5 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 754 20 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 12 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9-2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.100 g(q1) 39.5 1.3 g(q2) 31.5 0.0 g(q) 70.9 1.3 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 138 s'v`:a; c,7;:ri2; ;,at'atxaCSr=�':�7r`s • 111V . ..... .... V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) alpha 0.550 beta 0.645 Travel time, t(a) (sec) 5.831 Smoothing Factor, F 0.326 Proportion of conflicting flow, f 0.705 0.019 Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1199 13 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1000 1000 Duration of blocked period, t(p) 67.3 0.0 Proportion time blocked, p 0.000 0.561 Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result ' < Z p(2) 0.000 r Ui LLI p(5) 0.561 OJ p(dom) 0.561 p(subo) 0.000 0 O co Constrained or unconstrained? U w w I Proportion E_ u) unblocked (1) (2) (3) 0 for minor Single -stage Two -Stage Process 2 movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II 5 p(1) 0.439 u_ p(4) = w P(7) 1._ H P( P( p(10) 0.439 0.000 0.000 w I' . p(11) 0.439 0.000 0.000 ? D . p(12) 0.439 0 0 Y2 Computation 4 and 5 — Single -Stage Process = w Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 I— L L L T R L T R LI0 V c,x 1079 1435 1435 977 s 1700 1700 1700 1700 Px 0.439 0.439 0.439 0.439 V c,u,x 286 1097 1097 54 C r,x 1288 238 215 1019 C plat,x 566 105 94 448 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 967 468 967 468 s 1700 1700 1700 1700 P(x) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 V(c,u,x) 0 0 0 0 C(r,x) 1029 1029 900 900 C(plat,x) 0 0 0 0 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 139 ..� s '. 1 �;...: «�Ftt�: .Y:. .. rt ifMiv; S; W.;". �.`": C"'......"' •tr,.rraa:i.3ti�$.'''e.':- q✓+rs. i'�r�:':��:.�ix Conflicting Flows 977 Potential Capacity 448 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 441 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.90 L +M ...wN S . I n so ......... .. .. Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1079 Potential Capacity 566 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 561 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 94 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 Movement Capacity • 90 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.95 Movement Capacity 100 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 . First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue free St. 0.00 0.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 468 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 94 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 90 0.99 0.97 0.98 0.96 �'t �l:'a`s._�i7�i .. �eiti _i�:`^:q'r' ^......}:iJ: li Y+ �y' �z' g?'�^tt ?; ?�''i:'.:�37�:`,r;c;ay .,;,:� +.�:: =�': - •kr,'i�'h+p.�ny';F' ip.'(,`r.�. 140 f a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage 0 , Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor , Cap. Adj. factor due to Impedig mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 468 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity . 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.95 Movement Capacity 100 Results for Two -stage process: a y Ct Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 150 0 44 Movement Capacity (vph) 100 90 441 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 121 Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90 1.00 7 10 0.00 0.00 100 100 90 441 15U 0 44 121 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.00 141 • :w•,� %.x\^.r:e1;aMJCyyy,p Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service �01 Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 ^ / Lane Config LT LTR 'v v(vph) 11 194 =.. C(nn) (vph) 561 121 v/c 0.02 1.60 :" . . 95% queue length 0.00 12.20 Control Delay 11.5 370.2 ; LOS B F � ' Approach Delay 370.2 Approach LOS F 1 .- Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay ii Movement 2 Movement 5 ' '-� POD 0.98 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 436 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 I sal), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 '-� s(|2). Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p°(np 0.97 ~` d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.5 N. Number of major streotthrough lanes 1 NMI r,A Volume 11 415 910 107 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized? No Lanes 0 1 1 1 Configuration LT T .R Upstream Signal? No Yes 7 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. Analyst: MJJ, s15452wt Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 143 42 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 150 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 1 10 11 12 Lane Config LT I 1 L R v (vph) 11 150 44 C(m) (vph) 561 101 441 v/c 0.02 1.49 0.10 95% queue length 0.00 9.31 0.27 Control Delay 11.5 338.8 14.1 LOS B F B Approach Delay 265.2 Approach LOS F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 143 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425. 453.5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, s15452wt Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: 2006 w/ project and sbrt /It Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R co Volume 11 415 910 107 w O. Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 • 0.95 0.95 2 Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 109 239 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 u_ < Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- cn d Median Type Undivided I w RT Channelized? No H I Lanes 0 1 1 1 Z Configuration LT T R Z O. Upstream Signal? No Yes w • w U � O 9 . C3 H W W I F- - ILL- 0 .Z W - • I O H Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 143 42 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 38 11 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 150 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 Configuration L R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 10 10 0 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 0 1 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 144 Z w-� S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left -Turn 20 1700 3 12 120 35 300 Through 754 1700 3 31 120 35 300 Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 436 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 0 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 . 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 0.70 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 6.4 6.2 2 -stage 4.1 5.4 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 2.20 3.50 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 3.3 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 754 20 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 12 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9.2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.100 g(q 1) 39.5 1.3 g(q2) 31.5 0.0 g(q) 70.9 1.3 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 145 .;- :,;,2 = +_. y. 'Ln�t:.'ui> I ' alpha 0.550 beta 0.645 Travel time, t(a) (sec) 5.831 Smoothing Factor, F 0.326 Proportion of conflicting flow, f 0.705 0.019 Max platooned flow, V(c,max) 1199 13 Min platooned flow, V(c,min) 1000 1000 Duration of blocked period, t(p) 67.3 0.0 Proportion time blocked, p , 0.000 0.561 Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.000 p(5) 0.561 p(dom) 0.561 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) ,.,v. vi ,,.... ... • I ...I .. .. U Proportion unblocked (1) (2) (3) for minor Single -stage Two•Stage.Process movements, p(x) Process Stage I Stage II p(1) 0.439 p(4) (.aril P(7) p( P( p(10) 0.439 0.000 0.000 p(11) p(12) 0.439 Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x 1079 1435 977 s 1700 1700 1700 Px 0.439 0.439 0.439 V c,u,x 286 1097 54 C r,x 1288 238 1019 C plat,x 566 105 448 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 967 468 s 1700 1700 P(x) 0.000 0.000 V(c,u,x) 0 0 C(r,x) 1029 1029 C(plat,x) 0 0 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 146 Wool .y ... ,.. ... .., .. V.11 ......V. ••• Conflicting Flows 977 Potential Capacity 448 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.98 Movement Capacity 441 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.90 Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 1079 Potential Capacity 566 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 0.99 Movement Capacity 561 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 0.97 Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 4 1 8 11 1.00 7 10 0.99 0.97 Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.96 Movement Capacity 101 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 • First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 --' Movement Capacity 0 0 Probability of Queue free St. 0.00 0.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.97 0.97 147 kw t..h, IWJUII IVI . Jlugl. a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 Movement Capacity 0 0 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 468 Potential Capacity 0 0 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.00 Movement Capacity 0 0 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.00 0.00 y 0.00 0.00 C t 101 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 1.00 0.99 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 0.99 0.99 0.00 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 105 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.97 0.97 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.87 0.96 Movement Capacity 101 Volume (vph) 150 44 Movement Capacity (vph) 101 441 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep 101 441 Volume 150 44 Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 148 Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service ' ~~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config LT / � x(vph) 11 150 44 Pa• C(mn){vph} 561 101 441 v/c 0.02 1.49 0.10 ' ^ 95% queue length 0.00 9.31 0.27 Control Delay 11.5 338.8 14.1 LOS B F B Approach Delay 265.2 Approach LOS F � — ~° | VVorhoheotll��harudMa��LT|mpedanno and Delay . . Movement 2 Movement 5 0.98 1.00 � va for stream 2 5 436 2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 0 .! s(U), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 1700 | s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 1700 p 0.97 d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 11.5 `1 N. Nurnborofrnojor street through lanes 1 � ' d(ronh,1) Delay for stream 2 or 5 0.3 149 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. Analyst: MJJ, s15452wc Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Z Movement 1 2 3 I 4 5 6 I Z L T R I L T R �hij , Volume 11 415 910 107 J : Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 .. c w Median Type TWLTL w 2 RT Channelized? No 'J I-- Lanes 1 1 1 1 u) u' Configuration L T T R w 0 Upstream Signal? No Yes 2 J Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound co Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 _ L T R I L T R I-w Z !_- Volume 143 0 42 Z O: Hourly Flow Rate, HFR • 150 0 44 w w Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 2 D ` U 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 0 in Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No 0 I- Storage = w 1 w w . RT Channelized? f— H Lanes 0 1 0 L!- O Configuration LTR .. Z' 0 - O Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config L ( LTR v (vph) 11 194 C(m) (vph) 562 303 v/c 0.02 0.64 95% queue length 0.00 3.84 Control Delay 11.5 35.8 LOS B E Approach Delay 35.8 Approach LOS E HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 150 Z pasi Intersection: S. 154th St /52nd Ave. S. City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, s15452wc Project No.: T084601 • Time period Analyzed: 2006 w/ project It turn chan eOil Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: S. 154th Street H North /South Street: 52nd Ave. South Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 1 1L111 I%VUi11u". I v.6.. VuI•.i lva Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 415 910 107 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 . 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 3 109 239 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 436 957 112 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Median Type TWLTL RT Channelized? No Lanes 1 1 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal? No Yes Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 143 0 42 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 Peak -15 Minute Volume 38 0 11 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 150 0 44 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 1 Flared Approach: Exists? No Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 0 Configuration LTR Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 10 10 10 10 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 1 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 151 ■ ' a S2 Left-Turn Through S5 Left-Turn 20 1700 3 12 120 35 300 Through 754 1700 3 31 120 35 300 Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 t(c,hv) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(hv) 0 0 0 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 020 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 4.1 6.4 6.5 6.2 2 -stage 4.1 5.4 5.5 6.2 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 220 3.50 4.00 3.30 t(f,HV) 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 P(HV) 0 0 0 0 t(f) 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 754 20 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 1700 1700 Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 12 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9-2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.100 g(q1) 39.5 L3 g(q2) 31.5 0.0 g(q) 70.9 1.3 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 152 iM... •j {e wJrt.u3�Tl+*%- ieWU Yrrv'NS:tu'Mift sr3M.vti leiaViil71=IAl1tl fi14 �i�L.2lv.:�." F101 alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p . p( p(5) p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single-stage movements, p(x) Process p(1) p(4) p(7) p(8) p( p(10) p(11) p( V(c,x) s P(x) V(c,u,x) C(r,x) C(plat,x) 0.434 V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x 567 0.434 0.434 0.434 1079 1700 0.434 270 1305 1.1j.t.111,.I Il 4— 1. V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods Result 0.000 0.566 0.566 0.000 ( ( Two•Stage• Process Stage I Stage II 0.434 u 0.000 1.000 0.434 1.000 0.400 0.714 5.831 0.375 0.705 0.019 1199 14 1000 1000 67.9 0.0 0.566 Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R 1435 1435 977 1700 1700 1700 0.434 0.434 0.434 1090 1090 36 240 217 1042 104 94 453 Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 967 468 967 468 1700 1700 1700 1700 0.434 1.000 0.434 1.000 13 468 13 468 1015 634 889 565 441 634 386 565 Worksheet 6-Impedance and Capacity Equations 153 sus'^..°— "^•R'.. jAlf .-11.Vp J.. 1%1 II V111 I•III.J1 V1.• Conflicting Flows 977 Potential Capacity 453 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Movement Capacity 445 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.90 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 1079 Potential Capacity 567 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 562 Z Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 0.98 = f~ Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. is-- w a e a 2 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 J U O 0 Conflicting Flows 1435 co 0 Potential Capacity 94 0) w Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 -J H Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 0.96 ! u_ Movement Capacity . 91 al 0 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 u_ Q u) d = W F- _ ZF- I- O w ~ w O • D- o 1-- w W Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance = 0 ti.i Z C.) u - Z O I- Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 104 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.96 Movement Capacity 99 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 565 386 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 549 383 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows • 468 Potential Capacity 300 565 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.97 Movement Capacity 298 549 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1435 Potential Capacity 94 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.96 Movement Capacity 91 0.98 0.96 154 Z ►aa 1l IUI L Jldgt Ni Vl.u�o. a y Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 0.91 0.91 0.64 246 1.00 1.00 7 10 Part 1 . First Stage Conflicting Flows 967 Potential Capacity 634 441 Pedestrian Impedance Factor. 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.97 0.99 Movement Capacity 616 437 Part 2 - Second Stage uw Conflicting Flows 468 Potential Capacity 367 634 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.89 0.97 I;;, Movement Capacity 328 616 1 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows . 1435 Potential Capacity 104 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.96 0.96 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.97 0.97 ■°v' Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.86 0.96 Movement Capacity 99 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.91 0.91 0.65 Ct 277 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 150 0 44 Movement Capacity (vph) 277 246 445 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) 303 Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 277 246 445 150 0 44 303 155 Z . w 00 U D W =• J • W w • j � ▪ w Z F... I— 0 z I- w w • n. U U• D F- lu W f- - . u w • U ci I= mo. 0 Z ' ` i Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 . Lane Config L LTR v(vph) 11 194 C(n) (vph) 562 303 i v/c D.O2 D.64 , 0.00 3.84 Control Delay 11. 5 35.8 , '! LOS B E � / ., Approach Delay 35.8 � \ � ... Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 J POD 0i98 1.00 v(i2), Volume for stre m 3 or 6 5 ~' Saturation .. rate fo stream 2 or s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 px ' reonn1or4 11.5 d(rank,1) Delay for stream m 2 or 5 156 wn Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp existing (sl54sr5e) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v /c) 0.71 Vehicle Delay 34.9 Level of Service C Sq 71 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 North * * * * * v + +> G/C =0.543 G= 65.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% C =120 sec N Approach S Approach E Approach W Approach *> * * . G/C =0.096 G= 11.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =57.6% ILT +TH +RTI 12/1 - 10.255 10.096 1 1 G/C =0.262 G= 31.4" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =70. 5% 1 Lane (Width /' g I Service Rate' Adj G roup Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) OE Volume 27.2 C+ 53.5 D 45.0 D+ 38.2 D+ 01/30/01 12:24:56 G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% v/c Delay S 19Queue 535 1 LT +RT 12/1-10.532 10.543 0.543 1 867 1 970 1 659 10.856 0.679 1 21.8 l*CC +i 508 ft 1 112 1 63 10.450 1 53.5 1 *D I 96 ftl 1 LT 1 12/1 10.329 0.267 10.261 0.261 1 216 31 1 142 1 716 37 10.780 0.228 1 35.5 1 *D+ 1 446 ft TH +RTI 24/2 10.292 10.261 I 215 1 911 1 463 10.508 1 38.2 1 D +I 288 ft1 157 4`td ` ? :9 "..r..:_l'.7: ruY!, .,,. «r,,T, .o., . ra .w iv m c.- :a.u•�.. nxr. �i A»• aw uy. .; Ys. sw Moe Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp existing (sl54sr5e) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC(Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N -2.0 50 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 215 10 1060 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 1495 1787 71 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 65.11 11.51 31.38 4.00 4.00 4.00 2 8 5 0 E 0.0 50 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 680 35 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 620 NO YES S 0.0 50 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 40 0 20 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 1455 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME NONE 0.00 0.0 01/30/01 12:25:07 W 0.0 50 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 20 420 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3483 0 NONE 1 0 158 Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp 2006 w/o project (sl54sr5f) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v /c) 0.78 Sq 71 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 /• \ North * * <* * * * v +> G/C =0.543 G= 65.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% C =120 sec N Approach S Approach E Approach W Approach *> * *. G/C =0.096 G= 11.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =57.6% G/C =0.262 G= 31.4" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =70.5% Vehicle Delay 39.6 Level of Service D+ G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Lane (Width /1 g/C I Service Rate Adj 1 I HCM i L 190% Max Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue 33.5 C LT +RTI 12/1+ 0.481 10.543 0.543 I 867 I 970 I 726 10.929 0.748 I 24.4 l*D+1 C + 560 ft 54.1 D ILT +TH +RTI 12/1 - 10.257 10.096 I 1 I 112 I 68 10.486 I 54.1 I *D 1 104 ftl 49.8 D 01/30/01 12:24:15 TH LT 1 12/1 10.341 0.277 10.261 0.261 I 216 27 I 123 I 789 42 10.859 0.294 1 36.6 1 +I 91 4 52 ftl 39.1 D+ TH +RTI 24/2 10.298 10.261 I 215 I 912 I 510 10.559 I 39.1 I D +I 318 ftl 159 rna Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp 2006 w/o project (s154sr5f) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS Parameters RT 235 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 0 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N -2.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 TH 10 12.0 1 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 1514 LT 1170 12.0 1 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT 1787 RT 0 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 0 71 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 65.11 11.51 31.38 4.00 4.00 4.00 2 8 5 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 TH 750 24.0 2 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 3511 NO YES LT 40 12.0 1 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 547 RT 45 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 0 S 0.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 TH 0 12.0 1 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 1465 LT 20 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 DOPT 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME RT 20 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 0 NONE 0.00 0.0 01/30/01 12:24:24 W 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 TH 465 24.0 2 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 3487 LT 0 0.0 0 0.00 2.0 0.95 3 YES 4.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM 0 NONE 1 0 160 Z • W 6 J U O 0 co o W - H U u_ W L co = W Z N I- O W I- U • 0 O - O I-- W W I I- H tL O Z W U = O ~ Z c*• uH Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp 2006 w/ project (sl54sr5w) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16) - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v /c) 0.79 Vehicle Delay 40.2 Level of Service D+ Sq 71 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 * * / \ <* * +> < * * ** v + + ++ v North C =120 sec N Approach S Approach E Approach W Approach G/C =0.543 G= 65.1" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% <* * * G/C =0.096 G= 11.5" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =57.6% *> * *. ILT +TH +RTI 12/1 - 10.257 10.096 1 G/C =0.262 G= 31.4" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =70.5% G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 01/30/01 12:23:18 1 Lane (Width /l g/C Service Rate' Adj l HCM L 190% Mal �..A Group Lanes 1 Reqd Used CSC (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue 33.8 C LT +RT1 12/1 +10.482 10.543 0.543 1 867 1 970 1 728 10.932 0.751 1 24.5 1 * C +1 562 ft1 54.1 D 1 1 112 1 68 10.486 1 54.1 1 *D 1 104 ftl 50.3 D TH LT 1 12/1 10.342 0.287 10.261 0.261 1 216 21 1 100 1 794 42 10.865 0.353 1 37.9 IleDD +1 495 52 ftl 40.5 D+ TH +RTI 24/2 10.307 10.261 1 215 1 913 1 572 10.627 1 40.5 1 D +1 356 ft1 161 r O AF ;4 Aritkr p G.1 Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis S. 154th St /SR 5 SB off -ramp 2006 w/ project (s154sr5w) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N -2.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 238 10 1170 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 1514 1787 71 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 65.11 11.51 31.38 4.00 4.00 4.00 2 8 5 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 754 40 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 456 NO YES S 0.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 45 0 20 0.0 12.0 0.0 0 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 1465 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME 01/30/01 12:23:37 W 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 20 523 0 0.0 24.0 0.0 0 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3490 0 NONE 0.00 0.0 NONE 1 0 162 1A4 r t i { ONI HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: SR 405 SB off/Southcenter Blvd sir Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofe Project No.: T084601 ¢ �v f Date: 1/30/01 t,r East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd we North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp I ° Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1468 644 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1545 677 Percent Heavy Vehicles •• -- ,. Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? f'r Lanes 2 2 Configuration T T • Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 106 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 111 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I L v (vph) 111 C(m) (vph) 166 v/c 0.67 95% queue length 3.39 Control Delay 62.1 LOS F Approach Delay 62.1 Approach LOS F HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 163 Y+� L1. f../ 1J.L111 I1VUI l..... 14.L. 1.1141 lv 1 v1 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425-455-5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Intersection: SR 405 SB off /Southcenter Blvd City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofe Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: existing unadjusted volume Z Date: 1/30/01 1 H East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd k— w North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp W Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 t6i U 0 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments co o Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R _11_ co a, Volume 1468 644 w O Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 2 Peak-15 Minute Volume 386 169 Q Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1545 677 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- •- — Cr Median Type Raised curb H w RT Channelized? Z = Lanes 2 2 — H Configuration T T Z ,— Upstream Signal? Yes No ?. Do Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 0 D . o I-- w w I P- O .Z w o 0 0 1- Volume 106 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 Peak-15 Minute Volume 28 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 111 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS L T R L T R Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 10 10 10 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 1 1 1 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog, Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 164 Pm S2 Left-Turn 962 1700 3 65 120 35 1000 �ry Through 382 1700 3 31 120 35 1000 S5 Left -Turn Through pun Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.5 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.8 2 -stage 5.8 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L LL T R L T R t(f,base) 3.50 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 0 t(f) 3.5 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 382 962 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3400 -- Arrival Type 3 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 31 65 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 J Rp (from table 9.2) 1.000 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.258 0.542 g(q1) 10.0 15.6 g(q2) L3 6.1 g(q) 11.3 21.7 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked b'r`k:',%r! uh�' � 1pt .}:yy:xr M�,yu �''1•,r x.;. .. f.::.. .Y. +. a �+i'�++.MM' l •, .ry :fi ffa alpha beta Ran Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p I :1 p(1) p(4) p( p( p( p(10) ,,a:., p(11) p( Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.037 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) 0.037 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single -stage movements, p(x) Process Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 1555 348 s 3400 3400 P(x) 0.963 1.000 V(c,u,x) 1484 348 C(r,x) 178 692 C(plat,x) 171 692 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) 0.963 0.963 1903 3400 0.963 1845 68 65 0.400 0.714 19.436 0.153 0.247 0.623 710 2059 2000 2000 0.0 4.5 0.037 U ( ( Two -Stage Process Stage I Stage II 1.000 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 0.000 166 Pa Fug tiowl Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 4 1 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1903 y ! Potential Capacity 65 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 0.99 _y, Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.99 Movement Capacity 64 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 Part 1 . First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 183 455 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 1.00 Movement Capacity 181 455 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 455 183 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 0.99 Movement Capacity 455 181 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 167 nesu t tut t sedge p u t t s . a 0.98 0.98 Die y Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 1555 Potential Capacity 171 472 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 1.00 Movement Capacity 170 472 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 348 Potential Capacity 692 452 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.99 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.99 0.99 Movement Capacity 686 448 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1903 Potential Capacity 65 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 0.98 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.99 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.99 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 Movement Capacity 64 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.98 y 0.17 C t 166 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 111 Movement Capacity (vph) 166 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 166 111 1.00 1.00 7 10 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 168 Worksheet 10•Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service rces Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L v (vph) 111 C(m) (vph) 166 v/c 0.67 95% queue length 3.39 Control Delay 62.1 LOS F Approach Delay 62.1 Approach LOS F Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 p(oj) 1.00 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 ,, v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 elts s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 Px(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes .. -1 d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 169 I• j • • TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2223 - 112th Avenue N.E., Suite 101 BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004 (425) 455-5320 FAX (425) 453 -5759 JOB SHEET NO OF CALCULATED BY DATE CHECKED BY DATE De �7 sza 1(o RE 'Y v c .f e f l 7 f.-c-7 /.? J ZOO (‘3G /6`f r 1760 /7 /� .1) e fe7 (Sr c \ ) AO el 6.c-c, b eL r (iec) 1)t.1., (re c) Z ‘(0 -s? C2 - c 22 — yL (- I 19 `f s 6 3 35 2tF zZ /3 37 G 7?- 6 8 /S? 2_ JI lZ `F 25 /6 8 /5" ei- Gd 26 /?- ,e SY 22 3l 17 f3 2'/ I c 2 `f `f 3o s' 20 /C 22 S (2 3f 6'- 6 S 20 3L j G2. 2.4 / 2 3V Sn' 3 / ? 0 8' IF LOS g 7 2 s st 10 ?a Sc 3s S1 , '3 s 2Z 6YC 2 27.7 aie"- -5 r 170 Intersection: raw Analyst: Project No.: Date: HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd MJJ, sr405ofe �F 4 ,O,�,F �,D it."( -it TO84601 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1468 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1468 Percent Heavy Vehicles .- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 2 Configuration T Upstream Signal? Yes Minor Street: Approach Movement 7 L T 2 T No Northbound Southbound 8 9 110 11 12 R I L T R Volume 106 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 1 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I L I v (vph) C(m) (vph) �-i v/c 95% queue length Control Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS 106 260 0.41 1.86 28.1 D 28.1 D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 644 644 171 .. ..�.....„ .-.. ,.•..+...:.:C' «a:✓'wr.v. .�i">i'.�.r ".%.ar. �., �..{... �, �`:ai.3,'. «.«.+.�`i+r'a�:r1:,.r '�'... .�:.:�;:).:.`+:5..'`w';,.,�[�'. Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425.455.5320 E•Maii: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd "°' City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofe Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: existing fig 4, adjusted input Date: 1/30/01 Z East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd • Q North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp ;= Z Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 W LLI Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments U O Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 L T R L T R w Volume 1468 644 to u_ Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 W O Peak-15 Minute Volume 367 161 2 Hourl y Flow Rate, HFR 1468 644 Percent Heavy Vehicles •- •• u.. Median Type Raised curb co d RT Channelized? _ Lanes 2 2 Z Configuration T T O Upstream Signal? Yes No Z I... Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 2 D L T R L T R U� O— Volume 106 0 I— j Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 2 0 ill Peak -15 Minute Volume 26 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 106 u_ Z Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 W Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 0 N Median Storage 4 H 1 Flared Approach: Exists? Z Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 172 i s K „ S2 Left-Turn 382 1700 3 50 120 35 1000 Through 962 1700 5 30 120 35 1000 S5 Left -Turn Through cwa Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow-up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.5 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 (100 t(c) 1 -stage 6.8 2 -stage 5.8 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 3.50 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 0 t(f) 3.5 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Movement 2 Movement 5 Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(l,prot) V prog 962 382 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3400 Arrival Type 5 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 30 50 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9.2) 1.667 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.417 0.417 g(q1) 19.8 7.9 g(q2) 17.7 1.0 g(q) 37.5 8.9 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 173 • 1401 raa p( p(4) p( p( p( p(10) p(11) .p( alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.208 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) 0.208 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single -stage movements, p(x) Process Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x 0.792 Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 1468 322 s 3400 3400 P(x) 0.792 1.000 V(c,u,x) 960 322 C(r,x) 337 713 C(plat,x) 267 713 • V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) 1790 3400 0.792 1366 141 112 0.400 0.714 19.436 0.153 0.655 0.260 2224 681 2000 2000 25.0 0.0 0.208 0.792 U ( ( Two - Stage. Process Stage I Stage II 1.000 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 0.000 174 • 4- Z ce w O 0 07 0: W co w g -J 07 a I- w Z ZF- I- O ZI— w w U � O � O I- W u.l • U lL O Z .. w U= O 1- Z r t ..iwr. .. .. i u.,.n �........ .-.. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Conflicting Flows 1790 Potential Capacity 112 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 112 1.00 7 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance 8 11 1 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity • 268 471 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 268 471 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 471 268 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 471 268 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 175 • } CarA • 1 \4JN 1%. IJI _ Jl4O a 0.98 0.98 y Ct Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor St. Part 1 • First Stage pa Conflicting Flows 1468 Potential Capacity 267 490 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 267 490 Z Part 2 • Second Stage _ Z 4- -- Conflicting Flows 322 !Y Lii Potential Capacity 713 785 D Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 U p Movement Capacity 713 785 w w I;:L7 J = Part 3 • Single Stage cn u Conflicting Flows 1790 . w O F_rtil Potential Capacity 112 2 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 u_ ¢. Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 co a Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 = w Movement Capacity 112 Z H I- 0 Z I•- Results for Two -stage process: a 0.98 0.26 C t 260 Worksheet 8-Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 106 Movement Capacity (vph) 260 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 260 106 7 10 0.98 176 !� Worksheet 10-Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service iv Pa Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Config L 106 C(m) (vph) 260 v/n 0.41 95% eue length 1.88 LOS - ` . ; Approach Delay 28.1 Approach LOS D ` ! Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 11-Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay POD 1{}O 1.00 wa|), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(i/), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 Px(oj) d(/N.LT). Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(ranh Delay for stream 2 or 5 ■ '-- i Far kM. I.. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofe Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 L T R I L T R Volume 1615 710 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1615 710 Percent Heavy Vehicles -• Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 L T R I L T R Volume 115 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 115 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I L v (vph) 115 C(m) (vph) 245 v/c 0.47 95% queue length 2.24 Control Delay 32.1 LOS D Approach Delay 32.1 Approach LOS D HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 178 .. �'i ;'/.:fir. +�C...`.� ....:,:C.w u..�..u'.� •r �.kha :.s Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Volume 115 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 • Peak -15 Minute Volume 29 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 115 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? " Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L Fax: 425-453-5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd ; Kim City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofe Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: existing Pa Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd c North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1615 710 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 404 178 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1615 710 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 i . i Configuration T T Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R 0 Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 179 "°a• S2 Left-Turn 420 1700 3 50 120 35 1000 Through 1060 1700 5 30 120 35 1000 S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 LL L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.5 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.8 2 -stage 5.8 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 3.50 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 0 t(f) 3.5 Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 1060 420 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3400 Arrival Type 5 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 30 50 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9-2) 1.667 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.417 0.417 g(q1) 21.8 8.6 g(q2) 23.6 1.2 g(q) 45.4 9.9 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 180 Z w O 0 CO �. W w J F CO W La gQ = • a � Z I- O w ~ O - .0 H w w . 2 O z U 5 O Z "' Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p p( p(5) p(dom) p(subo) Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single -stage movements, p(x) Process p(1) p(4) P( p( p( P(1 p(11) p( Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 L L V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x Two -Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 1615 355 s 3400 3400 P(x) 0.723 1.000 V(c,u,x) 932 355 C(r,x) 348 686 C(plat,x) 252 686 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) 0.277 0.000 0.277 0.000 0.723 0.723 1970 3400 0.723 1423 129 93 0.400 0.714 19.436 0.153 0.656 0.260 2230 712 2000 2000 33.2 0.0 0.277 0.000 U ( ( Two -Stage Process Stage I Stage II 1.000 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 181 Conflicting Flows ' " Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor f" Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor `°ia Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. 4.4. • 4.. „1 I,V.,. n,...v. �. .. Step 2: LT from Major St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1970 Potential Capacity 93 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 Movement Capacity 93 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 252 440 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 252 440 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 440 252 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 440 252 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 182 1 • .,. a.. ......b.. ,. pki a Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 1615 Potential Capacity 252 454 Pedestrian Impedance Factor , 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 wil Movement Capacity 252 454 r•w � �•.1 y Ct Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows 355 Potential Capacity 686 744 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 686 744 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 1970 , ,,,,, Potential Capacity 93 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 1 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 , Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 93 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.98 y 0.27 C t 245 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations 0.98 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 115 Movement Capacity (vph) 245 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q.sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 245 115 183 • yti,!,; iw Ai W41,11-16 1 - ,''•tia..N::l�+n.�oii�- �.;si.' 1 . Y. - f 54 �,:,�.wf;.. , J; Worksheet 1O•De|oy, Queue Length, and Level of Service pi Movement Lane Config , • 1.00 ma|), Volume for stream 2or5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(iI), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 d(K8 LT} Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 ' � • 115 C(m) (vph) 245 v/c 0.47 95g& queue length .2.24 Control Delay 32.1 LOS D Approach Delay 32.1 Approach LOS D 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L Worksheet 11.Shared Major LT Impedance and Detay Movement 2 Movement 5 1.00 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd tae Analyst: MJJ, sr405off Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd ram North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Z Movement 1 2 3 14 5 6 = H.: L T R I L T R iF- w Volume 1785 785 6 rt D j Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1785 785 U O ' Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- u) Cl Median Type Raised curb W '' RT Channelized? -J H L anes 2 2 N u_ Configuration T T , w O. P . 1 Upstream Signal? Yes No ¢ n ¢ I ...9 Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound LL Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 N d L T R I L T R = w F- = Z1.- I- O Z w 0 0 U p O 2 cal-- w W ' I I- — li. a W Z U -u2 P. 0 l- O HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Volume 125 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 125 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration 1 L Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I L v (vph) 125 C(m) (vph) 239 v/c 0.52 95% queue length 2.61 Control Delay 35.5 LOS E Approach Delay 35.5 Approach LOS E HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 185 z Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd F City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, sr405off Project No.: T084601 , Time period Analyzed: pm peak 2006 w/o project Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Bellevue, WA 98004 Phone: 425. 455.5320 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com Fax: 425.453.5759 TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 1785 785 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 4h „ Peak -15 Minute Volume 446 196 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1785 785 Percent Heavy Vehicles -• -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? Yes No Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 125 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 31 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 125 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L 0 Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft /sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. at Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 186 fol S2 Left-Turn 465 1700 3 50 120 35 1000 Through 1170 1700 5 30 120 35 1000 S5 Left-Turn Through Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Movement 2 Movement 5 Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: I Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: y Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation 'x 1 Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.5 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.8 2 -stage 5.8 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 3.50 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 0 t(f) 3.5 Worksheet 5- Effect of Upstream Signals Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 1170 465 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3400 Arrival Type 5 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 30 50 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9-2) 1.667 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.417 0.417 g(q1) 24.1 9.6 g(q2) 32.4 1.5 g(q) 56.5 11.1 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 187 - ... . a1:J � �s . : - '(; � �S •.; t''i` .. ., alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned flow, V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p Computation 3- Platoon Event Periods Result p(2) 0.370 p(5) 0.000 p(dom) 0.370 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single -stage movements, p(x) Process p( p( p( p( p( p(10) p(11) p( Computation 4 and 5 Single -Stage Process Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R V c,x s Px V c,u,x C r,x C plat,x V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) 0.630 0.630 2177 3400 0.630 1459 122 77 0.400 0.714 19.436 0.153 0.655 0,261 2228 745 2000 2000 44.4 0.0 0.370 0.000 U ( ( Two -Stage Process Stage I Stage II 1.000 Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 V(c,x) 1785 392 s 3400 3400 P(x) 0.630 1.000 V(c,u,x) 837 392 C(r,x) 390 658 C(plat,x) 246 658 Worksheet 6- Impedance and Capacity Equations 188 ,,, 11 v... . ... .. Fo Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 paa Movement Capacity I Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 4.71 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 3 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 r,.y Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 ,;,;, Conflicting Flows 2177 Potential Capacity 77 :y Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 ::Ny Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 77 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 243 407 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 243 407 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 407 243 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 407 243 Part 3 - Single Stage -- Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 189 pilm a I {, y ' Ct Probability of Queue free St. fay Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Part 1 - First Stage FC" Conflicting Flows 1785 Potential Capacity 246 415 Pedestrian Impedance Factor, 1.00 1.00 6 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 246 415 I . Part 2 - Second Stage i , Conflicting Flows 392 Potential Capacity 658 648 1 N Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 {Ad Movement Capacity 658 648 ! .; Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows 2177 , Potential Capacity 77 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 -" Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 P ." Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 77 Results for Two -stage process: a 0.98 y 0.29 C t 239 Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (vph) 125 Movement Capacity (vph) 239 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 239 125 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 190 . Yf ' v..0 f'y!. .. h,� Mf M;ir•; :(.[ {i1:.4?✓yr4�`,:ifFC wffNY:P(LIIt� • . .. Worksheet 10- Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service pa Movement Lane Config v (vph) 125 C(m) (vph) 239 v/c 0.52 95% queue length ,2.61 Control Delay 35.5 LOS E Approach Delay 35.5 Approach LOS E 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L Worksheet 11- Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Movement 2 Movement 5 POD 1.00 1.00 v(il), Volume for stream 2 or 5 v(12), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(il), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P "(oj) d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes d(rank,l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 191 s ", ..,J:�,�"�'t'.iujvixn•.^ti::. `. w K�t.x.• ... •��'rM..y, `. ., , 3,:.+*,Lj4 Z `~ 1112 U . 0O. W 2' CO LL W O co = a F_ W Z F.., F- O Z f".. n .0 O T. • CI F-; o W W. F— u' O ' W z . U - ` H H O z TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd ra Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofw ' Project No.: T084601 Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd FA North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 f Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments RA Major Street: Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 L T R I L T R `A Volume 1843 787 k k Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1843 787 Percent Heavy Vehicles -- -- Median Type Raised curb r2,1 RT Channelized? a Lanes 2 2 Configuration T T h" Upstream Signal? • Yes No Minor Street: Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 ,, L T R j L T R Volume 127 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 127 ;•M Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 I 7 8 9 I 10 11 12 Lane Config I L v (vph) 127 C(m) (vph) 202 v/c 0.63 95% queue length 3.30 Control Delay 48.9 LOS E Approach Delay 48.9 Approach LOS E HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 3.2 Mark Jacobs Transportation Planning & Engineering 192 -.LII .• ..I• ._ . ... -. .. .....- - Bellevue, WA 98004 I Phone: 425.455.5320 Fax: 425. 453.5759 E -Mail: mjacobs @tranplaneng.com TWO -WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Intersection: SR 5 SB off /Southcenter Blvd T, City /State: Tukwila, WA Analyst: MJJ, sr405ofw Project No.: T084601 Time period Analyzed: pm peak 2006 w/ project !. Date: 1/30/01 East /West Street: Southcenter Blvd I North /South Street: SR 405 off ramp Intersection Orientation: EW Study period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Movements 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R i Volume 1843 787 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Peak -15 Minute Volume 461 197 !' Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 1843 787 i ..,, Percent Heavy Vehicles •• -- Median Type Raised curb r,, 4 RT Channelized? Lanes 2 2 I: .1 Configuration T T Upstream Signal? Yes No ,z 4 Minor Street Movements 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume 127 Peak Hour Factor, PHF 1.00 Peak-15 Minute Volume 32 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 127 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 Percent Grade ( %) 0 Median Storage 4 Flared Approach: Exists? Storage RT Channelized? Lanes 1 Configuration L L T R L T R 0 Pedestrian Volumes and Adjustments Movements 13 14 15 16 Flow (ped /hr) 0 0 0 0 Lane Width (ft) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Walking Speed (ft/sec) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Percent Blockage 0 0 0 0 Upstream Signal Data Prog. Sat Arrival Green Cycle Prog. Distance Flow Flow Type Time Length Speed to Signal vph vph sec sec mph feet 193 S2 Left-Turn 523 1700 3 50 120 35 1000 F., Through 1170 1700 5 30 120 35 1000 S5 Left-Turn Through r•� r;zr Worksheet 3 -Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles Shared In volume, major th vehicles: Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: Number of major street through lanes: Worksheet 5 -Effect of Upstream Signals Movement 2 Movement 5 Worksheet 4- Critical Gap and Follow -up Time Calculation Critical Gap Calculation Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(c,base) 7.5 t(c,hv) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 P(hv) 0 t(c,g) 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.10 Grade /100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t(3,It) 0.70 t(c,T): 1 -stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2 -stage 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 t(c) 1 -stage 6.8 2 -stage 5.8 Follow -Up Time Calculations Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L L L T R L T R t(f,base) 3.50 t(f,HV) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 P(HV) 0 t(f) 3.5 Computation 1 -Queue Clearance Time at Upstream Signal Movement 2 Movement 5 V(t) V(I,prot) V(t) V(I,prot) V prog 1170 523 Total Saturation Flow Rate, s (vph) 3400 3400 Arrival Type 5 3 Effective Green, g (sec) 30 50 Cycle Length, C (sec) 120 120 Rp (from table 9.2) 1.667 1.000 Proportion vehicles arriving on green P 0.417 0.417 g(q 1) 24.1 10.8 g(q2) 32.4 2.0 g(q) 56.5 12.7 Computation 2- Proportion of TWSC Intersection Time blocked 194 Z _I- • w JU U Q u) W W I W • O 5 u_ = rn a w Z � Z I W • w U O (22 W H O w U � 0 Z • Computation 3-Platoon Event Periods fain p41 �� alpha beta Travel time, t(a) (sec) Smoothing Factor, F Proportion of conflicting flow, f Max platooned 8 V(c,max) Min platooned flow, V(c,min) Duration of blocked period, t(p) Proportion time blocked, p p(2) 0.349 P( 0.000 p(dom) 0.340 p(subo) 0.000 Constrained or unconstrained? Proportion unblocked (1) for minor Single-stage movements, p(x) Process Computation 4 and 5 Single-Stage Process Movement V(c,x) 1843 393 ~� w 3400 3400 P(x) 0'651 1.000 V(c,u,x) 1009 393 C(r,x) 318 657 C(plat,x) 207 657 0.651 0.651 L L L 2236 3400 0.651 1613 97 63 0.400 0.714 19.436 0.153 0.635 0.284 2158 848 2000 2000 41.8 0.0 0.349 U Result (2) (3) Two'Sta8ePmueos Stage I Stage II 1.000 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 T R L T R Two-Stage Process 7 8 10 11 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Stagel Stage2 Worksheet 6lmpedance and Capacity Equations 0.000 195 - --- • ` ` ' - _� ' .*I ..... .a.. .. .. Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 a Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 i' Movement Capacity Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Maj L- Shared Prob Q free St. Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity I411 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 n Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity Idx Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 i Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 2236 Potential Capacity 63 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 i:.a Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 r' a Movement Capacity 63 Worksheet 7- Computation of the Effect of Two -stage Gap Acceptance t. „; Part 2 - Second Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 406 208 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 406 208 Step 3: TH from Minor St. Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity 208 406 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 208 406 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Part 3 - Single Stage Conflicting Flows Potential Capacity Pedestrian Impedance Factor Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt Movement Capacity 8 11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 196 Part 1 - First Stage Conflicting Flows 1843 1 Potential Capacity 207 414 Pedestrian Impedance Factor, 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 207 414 Z a Part 2 - Second Stage f.yl Conflicting Flows 393 ce W Potential Capacity 657 670 -J 0 . , Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 0 0 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 0 0 ILI 1„,a Movement Capacity 657 670 W W ....ii._ <L Part 3 - Single Stage w 0 Conflicting Flows 2236 IA Potential Capacity 63 - Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 II I Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 1.00 1.00 = 0 f Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 1.00 1.00 W . H Movement Capacity 63 z � Results for Two stage process: I a a 0.98 0.98 0.24 C t 202 As • I:• Worksheet 8- Shared Lane Calculations Volume (vph) 127 Movement Capacity (vph) 202 Shared Lane Capacity (vph) Result Ito L Stake L/,uuebb. a Ct Probability of Queue free St. Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Worksheet 9- Computation of Effect of Flared Minor Street Approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R C sep Volume Delay Q sep Q sep +1 round (Qsep +1) n max C sh SUM C sep n 202 127 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 197 Z a ` |n Foul Worksheet 11-Shared [Nojo, LT Impedance and Delay }-� 1.00 ll] val), Volume for stream 2or5 v(i2), Volume for stream 3 or 6 s(11), Saturation flow rate for stream 2 or 5 s(i2), Saturation flow rate for stream 3 or 6 P«(o d(M,LT), Delay for stream 1 or 4 N, Number of major street through lanes 4 d(runk.l) Delay for stream 2 or 5 J • Worksheet 10'De|ay. Queue Length, and Level of Service Movement Lane Config 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 L v(vph) 127 C(m) (vph) 202 v/c 0.63 95% queue length .3.30 Control Delay 48.9 LOS E Approach Delay 48.9 Approach LOS E Movement 2 Movement 5 Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S existing (southmce) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC(Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary `; Intersection Averages: Degree of,Saturation (v /c) 0.70 Vehicle Delay 17.8 Level of Service B Sq 13 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 North <+ G/C =0.148 G= 17.8" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% C =120 sec N Approach E Approach W Approach G/C =0.175 G= 21.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =18.2% + + + + < * * ** G/C =0.577 G= 69.2" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =39.0% 01/30/01 12:37:42 G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% I Lane Width /1 g/C 1 Service Rate! Adj 1 HCM I L 190% Maxl Group Lanes Reqd Used ®C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue RT LT 1 12/1 10.272 0.272 10.357 0.148 1 363 1 1 205 1 126 10.226 0.543 1 50.0 *D + ! 181 ft! 38.6 D+ 23.6 C+ TH 24/2 10.284 0.533 10.758 0.577 1 1948 1 2041 1 1758 10.140 0.861 1 25.4 1 *C +1 628 ft1 9.5 A 1 LT 1 12/1 10.547 0.275 10.785 0.175 1 2756 1 1 2756 286 1 1805 158 10.655 0.510 i 46.2 I *D 1 220 ft1 199 Opus Park I -5/I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S existing (southmce) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS Movement Parameters Phasing Parameters NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N 0.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 120 0 120 12.0 0.0 12.0 1 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 0 1561 13 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 17.79 21.02 69.19 4.00 4.00 4.00 3 12 5 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 155 1670 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1536 3539 0 NO YES S 2.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME IMarm 01/30/01 12:37:56 W 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 1715 150 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 1770 NONE 0.00 0.0 NONE 1 0 200 't}:.sY .bA�+ M .�i• ,,, � 5 7 5 �ni r h�:1"'.` ' '3Y4.t� ,b x �R NCH <�. • .:4..1 Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S 2006 w/o project (southmcf) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of ! Saturation (v /c) 0.77 Vehicle Delay 22.3 Level of Service C+ Sq 13 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 A North N Approach + * + + ++ <+ *> G/C =0.148 G= 17.8" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% <+ G/C =0.175 G= 21.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =18.2% + + ++ < * * ** G/C =0.577 G= 69.2" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =39.0% C =120 sec G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% i Lane (Width /i g/C i Service Retell Adj i i HCM L 190% Maxi Group Lanes Reqd Used @C (vph) @E Volume v/c Delay S Queue 39.6 D+ RT LT 1 12/1 10.275 0.275 10.357 0.148 1 363 1 l 205 1 137 10.246 0.591 l 51.7 l *D +l 197 ftl E Approach 32.0 C W Approach 10.6 B+ 01/30/01 12:35:39 TH 24/2 10.288 0.575 10.758 0.577 1 1948 l 2041 l 1942 10.154 0.951 l 34.6 l *C 1 693 ftl TH LT l 12/1 10.592 0.279 10.785 0.175 l 2756 1 1 2756 286 1 1995 174 10.724 0.561 l 47.6 1 *D l 242 ftl 201 �.a Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S 2006 w/o project (southmcf) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N 0.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 130 0 130 12.0 0.0 12.0 1 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1561 0 1561 13 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 17.79 21.02 69.19 4.00 4.00 4.00 3 12 5 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 170 1845 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1536 3539 0 NO YES S 2.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME 01/30/01 12:36:11 W 0.0 25 NONE NONE 0.00 0.0 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 1895 165 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 1770 NONE 1 0 202 Opus Park I -5/I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S 2006 w/ project (southmcw) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of.Saturation (v /c) 0.78 Vehicle Delay 22.7 Level of Service C+ Sq 13 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 **/** A / North C =120 sec Lane Group lW idth! Lanesl Regdg /CUsed atel v/c Delay S 190% Queue N Approach E Approach W Approach G/C =0.148 G= 17.8" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% G/C =0.175 G= 21.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =18.2% ++++ <**** G/C =0.577 G= 69.2" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =39.0% G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 39.6 D+ 01/30/01 12:32:58 RT LT 1 12/1 10.275 0.275 10.357 0.148 1 363 1 1 205 1 137 10.246 0.591 l 51.7 1 *D +1 197 ftl 32.3 C 1 TH 1 24/2 10.288 0.576 10.758 0.577 1 1948 1 2041 1 1946 10.154 0.953 1 34.9 l *C 1 695 ft1 11.6 B+ 1 LT 1 12/1 10.599 0.287 10.785 0.175 1 2756 1 l 2756 286 i 2024 203 10.734 0.655 i 51.0 l *D 1 282 ftl 203 Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /Macadam Rd. S 2006 w/ project (southmcw) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC Movement Parameters MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS 1561 0 1561 Phasing Parameters SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N 0.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 130 0 130 12.0 0.0 12.0 1 0 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 13 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 17.79 21.02 69.19 4.00 4.00 4.00 3 12 5 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 170 1849 0 12.0 24.0 0.0 1 2 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 1536 3539 0 NO YES S 2.0 25 NONE 0 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 0 0 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME W 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 1923 193 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.95 0.95 0.95 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 1770 NONE 0.00 0.0 01/30/01 12:33:17 NONE 1 0 204 p" Opus Park I -5/I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /61st Ave S existing (south6le) ViuM Cam SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of (v /c) 0.78 Vehicle Delay 40.8 Level of Service D+ Sq 12 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 * * / ** North <+ + + ++ + V + C =120 sec S Approach E Approach W Approach G/C =0.444 G= 53.3" Y +R= 4.0" OFF= 0.0% G/C =0.139 G= 16.7" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =47.7% < + + ++ G/C =0.317 G= 38.0" Y +R= 4.0" OFF =65.0% G =108.0 sec = 90.0% Y =12.0 sec = 10.0% Pad= 0.0 sec = 0.0% 1 Lane Group 1 Lanes' Reqd Used 1 Service v/c Delay S 1 90% Queue 60.2 E+ 01/30/01 12:20:15 LT 12/1+10.458 12/1 + 10.444 0.444 1 544 1 686 1 574 11.038 0.837 1 38.5 l*F + 538 ft 42.7 D+ TH LT 1 12/1 10.363 0.301 10.489 0.139 1 1549 1 1 1718 1 256 10.534 1.036 1 118.7 1 *F +1 372 ft 28.6 C RT TH 1 12/1 10.566 0.417 10.794 0.317 1 2163 324 1 2163 590 1 1444 600 10.668 1.017 1 82.4 1 *F 1 692 fti 205 t?; ti Pa r+A Opus Park I -5 /I -405 Traffic Impact Analysis Southcenter Blvd /61st Ave S existing (south6le) SIGNAL97 /TEAPAC[Ver 1.02.16] - Summary of Parameter Values Intersection Parameters APPLABELS GRADES PEDLEVELS PARKINGSIDES PARKVOLUMES BUSVOLUMES RIGHTTURNONREDS UPSTREAMVC MOVLABELS VOLUMES WIDTHS LANES UTILIZATIONS TRUCKPERCENTS PEAKHOURFACTORS ARRIVALTYPES ACTUATIONS REQCLEARANCES MINIMUMS STARTUPLOST ENDGAIN IDEALSATFLOWS FACTORS DELAYFACTORS NSTOPFACTORS GROUPTYPES SATURATIONFLOWS SEQUENCES PERMISSIVES OVERLAPS CYCLES GREENTIMES YELLOWTIMES CRITICALS EXCESS METROAREA SIMULATION PERIOD LEVELOFSERVICE NODELOCATION Approach Parameters Movement Parameters Phasing Parameters NONCBD 15 C S 0 0 N 0.0 25 NONE 0 . 0 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 0 0 12 ALL NO NO NO YES YES YES 120 120 30 53.27 16.74 37.98 4.00 4.00 4.00 8 6 11 0 E 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 0 825 230 0.0 24.0 12.0 0 2 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 0 3511 1770 NO YES S 2.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 80 0 980 0.0 12.0 12.0 0 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM DOPT 0 1311 1546 LEADLAGS OFFSET PEDTIME 13,- t7wY' W 0.0 25 NONE 0 4 0 0.00 RT TH LT 1300 540 0 24.0 12.0 0.0 2 1 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.90 0.90 0.90 3 3 3 YES YES YES 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NORM NORM NORM 2726 1863 0 NONE 0.00 0.0 01/30/01 12:20:25 NONE 1 0 206 WPM OPUS Park 5/405 Level 1 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Control Plan July 2001 Prepared for: OPUS N.W. L.L.C. Prepared by: Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. ( EXPIRES 8/ 12/6 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Z 00 co 0 W= co u _ W O a = W Z � I- 0 Z W O - 0 I- W W L I H� W Z _ ; O ~ . z n.wC.�': t.�1 ✓t . ?rec; -. l f J,1.a7Y- ..,,ei .Ku�.`_�/ 5.+..a�ly: J1 r.sx- .a'1 '::GSN T {5 .�.'�:'...:' t � �i::»+� 1 >y:r� r:n,n }.. .t i . .:i..�� .r Task 1: Table of Contents Purpose and Scope 4 Study Area Definition and Maps Project Description Existing Site Conditions and Drainage Patterns 5 5 5 Task 2: Resource Review 12 Task 3: Field Inspection 15 Task 4: Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions 16 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems 17 Figures 1 Vicinity Map 7 2 Site Plan 8 3 Regional Basin Plan 9 4 Regional Topography 10 5 Aerial Photo 11 Exhibits 1 Existing Conditions 19 2 Developed Conditions 20 The purpose of this report is to fulfill the requirements of a Level 1 Drainage Analysis for the proposed OPUS Park 5/405 commercial development as required by City of Tukwila development guidelines. These guidelines require that the Level 1 Drainage Analysis be completed as per the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual Core Requirement #2. The format of this report follows the report format outlined in Section 1.2.2.1 and 2.3.1.1 of the 1998 KCSWDM. f. t { Purpose and Scope Existing hydrologic conditions on -site and downstream of the proposal site have been researched and observed. A description of these conditions are described herein. These existing conditions include topographic features such as ground elevations and slopes, wetlands, drainage patterns, ground cover, structures and soil types. Potential drainage related problems upstream, on -site and downstream of the proposed plat site are also addressed in Task 4 and 5 of this report. Identified downstream drainage problems are qualitatively discussed and potential mitigative measures are presented. An hydrologic assessment for the proposed development has also been completed. As part of this assessment preliminary sizing of the required stormwater control facilities are also provided in Task 5 of this report. r0011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park S/405 - Level I Drainage Analysis Page 4 Task 1: Study Area Definition and Maps Project Description The proposed OPUS Park 5/405 is 3.3 acre commercial development consisting of an office building and adjacent parking. The project site is located west of Interstate 5 and to the east of 51s Avenue South. The northern project boundary is approximately 200 ft to the north of South 148 Street and the south boundary is approximately 400 ft to the south. The project site is in the northwest quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in Tukwila Washington. A vicinity map showing the location of the project is shown on Figure 1. Access to the site is via 51S Avenue South. A preliminary site plan is shown on Figure 2. The project site is entirely within the Gilliam Creek sub -basin of the Green River Basin. The land area of the Gilliam Creek basin is about 1,835 acres in total. The proposed developments project site is located in the upper reaches of the Gilliam Creek Basin in the 1 -5 West Sub -basin as defined by the report titled, Gilliam Creek Basin, Description of Existing Conditions and Alternatives for Improvement, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Feb 2000. The 1 -5 West sub -basin is about 117 acres in size. Figure 3 shows the location of the project site in relation to the regional sub - basin. The project site is located approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the main stem of Gilliam Creek and about 1.5 miles upstream of Gilliam Creek's confluence with the Green River just south of the 1 -405. Existing Site Conditions and Drainage Patterns As discussed above, topographically the site is located within the 1 -5 West Sub -basin of the Gilliam Creek Basin. Drainage from this sub -basin is generally from the east side of a ridge running roughly parallel to 46 Avenue South as shown on Figure 4. Drainage within this basin flows to the east before heading south to the main stem of Gilliam Creek. Drainage within this sub -basin is conveyed through a combination of open channels, ditches and pipe segments. The eastern basin boundary is defined by the 1 -5 embankment, to the north by South 144 Street and to the south by SR 518 (Figure 3). The following is a detailed description of the existing site area and the on -site drainage conditions. The existing site conditions are shown on the enclosed Exhibit 1. A detailed description of the drainage system downstream of the site is given in Task 4 of this report. The site boundaries are shown on the enclosed preliminary site plan (Figure 2) and on the aerial photo (Figure 5). There are currently 6 single family residences, 4 outbuildings and both paved and gravel access roads located on the project site. Five of these residences are clustered around the southern portion of the site with the remaining home located near the northern limit of the site. The total impervious area of the project site is approximately 0.5 acres. The area surrounding the existing buildings is comprised of mainly grassed lawns, garden areas and individual trees. The area around the peripheral area of the site is more heavily vegetated. This vegetation includes Black Berries, tall grass, scrub and more densely treed areas. Significant grading and filling activities have occurred on the site and as part of construction of the 1 -5. Soil conditions on site are consistent with the SCS Urban Soils classification as shown on the SCS soils map in Appendix B and described in the Task 2 section of this report. These conditions have existed prior to 1979, therefore as per the 1998 KCSWDM, are considered as the existing site conditions. '001121L812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 5/405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 5 The western edge of the site is defined by the steep fill slope of 51s Avenue South. The main site area directly adjacent to 51S Avenue South slopes to the east at about a 10% slope before flattening to approximately a 5% slope across the site. This area drains directly towards a drainage__ ditch running parallel to the 1 -5 as shown on Figure 2 and Exhibit 1. This ditch is crassified as a Type 3 stream. The northern site area, the area west of Wetland A, is more steeply sloped away from 51S Avenue South. The ground is sloped at about a 30% slope for about 40 feet before flattening out over the existing fill area constructed for the northern most residence. This flatter area is sloped at approximately 2.5% before descending at a slope of about 20% down to Wetland A. Given these existing site conditions this portion of the site drains eastward towards Wetland A before discharging to the 1 -5 drainage ditch. Drainage from the off -site area upstream of the site flows across the OPUS Park 5/405 site in two locations. Drainage from portions of 51' Avenue South and the area west of 51S Avenue South crosses the road through a stormwater collection system and discharges to one of two manmade drainage ditches. These drainage ditches are classified as Type 3 streams. Each of these ditches show signs of recent excavation or maintenance. One channel is directly to south of the project site and the other crosses near the middle of the site. These ditches are identified on the existing conditions plan, Exhibit 1. These channels convey upstream drainage eastward across the site either directly to the 1 -5 ditch or to Wetland B directly adjacent to the 1 -5 ditch. A detailed description of these ditches is given in Task 4 of this report. 00011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 5/405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 6 0 2500 5000 = 5000' 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue. WA 96004 P.O. Box 3885 TEL (425) 482 -1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 462 -7710 PLOTTED: 00112VOLdvg RNIX 04/23/0111:0T SCALE: 1 • 8000' DATE: Apr 11. 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED: APPROVED: ACAD DWG.: 00112V01 VIEW: XREF: LSF: FLD BK: PG /: PSSF: VICINITY MAP OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON JOB NO: 00112 SHEET .e4�'puV:Y',a.o• ' is :v.�Pt.a,�t;P >u "�.;.� .n:. p _ «nYS''tY�,.&�.....ao�.C:7� .. awes mx a ., �.....-:..« �w..,.,.. a.•« ��a�.- r_,- ,- :.•._...,..,�..,....,_:. „ Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3585 TEL (425) 462 -1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 482 -7719 PLOTTED: 00112.06,dwg MWONG 07/16/0112:56 SCALE: I' • 100' DATE: Apr IT, 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED: APPROVED: VIEW: DJ XREF: LSF: FLD BK: PG #: ACAD DWG: 00112E0G d g PSSF: CITY OF TUKWILA • �i Fj 3t a f�, n AbrU..c' Mittfi'C w 'c.... ��_ � :�l'S' v �` � 5�r mow: 1fi^' r'; t"; �+ 1r>: a:.; c�: 1sc�s�e >�•as::�ir+�x:b,e,n,�•n- .,..w� wwa.w..�, :n«�.�......,,..Y... OPUS NW, L.L.0 SITE PLAN OPUS PARK 5/405 WASHINGTON JOB NO: 00112 SHEET FIG. 2 YYrkUret v :�}nrY.Si{x4NearrM,,Ahi6:rk.Y/' ,T4 Z ~ W Ce JU 0 U 0 LLI J = H WO u_ Q 2 • d � W Z 1— O Z W U • � O � CI I— W W 2 Z O Z yofSeaT Norihw: e Tribut: ry Southwest Tributary 166th Struol ■ �+ SUBBASIN J WSDOT 1 wetland �\ Ponds I S. CITY HALL SUBBASIN _ ,1111111s--.. 1A 411t Gtraet a • . • v 146TH ST .I — 1.5 WEST North 1 SUBBASIN Tributary 148TH u:,g05 Seattle Tacoma International Airport Tukwila City Limits South Tributary Soulhconlor Tukwila Pond SOUTHCENTER SUBBASIN Legend Major streets Open channel - ••• -- Piped Ilow — — Subbasin boundary Political boundary o 960 feet Approximate scale Figure 1. i Moo Gilliam Creek basic characteristics. SOURCE: GILLIAM CREEK BASIN STUDY, HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS FEBRUARY, 2000 .'!- isv gz'"fi' a'Fn1P.:'�`�,'S.ii »vv7r \ REGIONAL BASIN PLAN FIGURE 3 ST 299 04. • ■••••••• •••••••••0•••••••••.•••4 S* • M A \ • high Scr„ 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. • Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3565 TEL: (425) 462-1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 462-7719 PLOTTED: 00112E02.dvg RNIX 04/23/010:51 SCALE: 1 • 500' DATE: Apr 16, 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED: APPROVED: ACAD DWG.: 00112E02.dr VIEW: DJ XREF: L SF: FLD BK: PG #: PSSF: •- N:1 sli t Southcenter a L \ •,,,,, \ \, i ' I . • '.' i .' '1' .. ..•" --'---- , ." , L \ • ' ' ''.\ \ I '' , •■ . ,. /* - \c.• • ):: :. - A I ,,\.\\;,' le i ON iv - sz • CITY OF TUKWILA REGIONAL TOPOGRAPHY OPUS PARK 5/405 WASHINGTON Black Pumping a A • • * SHEET III • ; • • S r • • JOB NO: 00112 FIG. 4 : \ AC D PLAT S \ 00 \ 0 0 112 \ 001I2E02.dwg < • I 1 Z • w O 0 (.0 0 W • I • 0 It 71 U_ < cn • I Z F 0 z UJ O • D- o w 0 L i" 0 Z 1 - 1 - 1 O 1- z Atr.*, 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • 1215 114th Avenue SE • Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3665 TEL: (425) 462-1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 462-7719 "I'Ev4174;: uma. 03 -- . e r s hilIit4tet A -4 DESIGNED: APPROVED: ACAD DWG.: 00112E09.dw 0082E09.dvg RNIX 04/23/0111:52 I" • 300' Apr 11, 2001 RNIX co 0 0 rr I I I I I I 1 1. : 111.1 , , 11.) I 1 n i 1 7 1 ,/. 1 ,. 1 :1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I III I I I 1 Inch 111G -WESTCOTT 1 — • •-• • • Since 1872 • ; ' • ' f , 311. .1711. Z11. 1.11: '011. 16 • 19 IL 11111111111111 CITY OF TUKWILA AERIAL PHOTO OPUS PARK 5/405 WASHINGTON ■ 35mm Drawing 2 -3 • • • I 1 1 - - • • • • •.•• • .• ■• • ■• 11' 1111,1.1 • ,• , •• • [ • , ... • .. - • „ „ Ii11111 :1 11 11 1 11 1 11 1 [11 j.,1 11 FI.11:1 1 1 ' 5 1 ., • .• 6 • g 1 sin„:02 • 9 ••• ••• ••••'.;i1• • 1'11[1 [ 1 1 ,•••• • • *V(7 • ••• •••••-:-••••••• ••••••• • • -.'•••••••: •-•' • • • • • • ,...••• .• • • • P• ..... •• ••.. •••••••. : 1:1•••I•-•' 11 11 r 11 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 I i 1111 1111 1111.1111 1111 1111 11111111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1 1111 1 1111 1111 Ii 111 1111.1111 4 ), . , 4 1 Al.:6 ',.•;•■:' . ) ; I) ip 8 . 7. * P. 7. ao . e : 7 p.c.7o \\ 0 V \ \ \ \ \♦ \ \\ \ \\\\ r -...1 I \ O al O O to 0 NO. (S. TH 55 ) o{Z, P S H ' N 6 . sr . r° S. 12 s 7.E S. � 78r /6y, APP JD ° }rib i /ed Ac``s. e •Dy� r O � 15eo Z s7a E 0 7.D` •��� = N MA sTA� p A , B B h r o t \ Z41 W O 0 02 6 • t' .. •':1 L �� 7 14./ O b,r ;' :a M — . '. • SP 'err/ rz • 1 P/' N N 6t • • o L' .4Z, C .. U ..r. - h 0 Al "C 1(1 Ln •- y . �� S , f : Cf) R ��3e .s re- e•s rt D �, N coor2 'O72• ✓iemper7.t Since 1e72 ^f 7 " N 6' /Y /rzors Eo •ezr. [r { Lr Os 00. 1 �' 1 ' O/$ / A- O.YO 0 o . tl •ar o ° i - �; r !L' I� � z I i I • •U IH 4, O . 4 "•••••.. m n i n m H a k 1 v .' c, $•z 9 c c\ • C54 I IpI 11 1114111 I ICI IjI �4 1,I,iI I Iji_ I I II iail I 1 iIi i1i 111 1 1 I 1 I I ill 111I 1W 1 I I } .I 2. : 1 3 . ... : . 1 ..., 1 :..: 4 - Tr i r ..� 5 6 Inch ' 1G y WESTCOTT I) N 001 I .6•,4 s ?i• ST• 7 ^' p . '0.[1 /7 x.L /J 3/7,^ 4( • •N. tri 9 VII. Ell. Zl H. 'op. I6 I8 - I` (9 • I4 V .. IE IS l w3 . u n unlilii nnlnn I nI1IIIt1 IIIiluII IIIIl niiliiii iiiiliiii iiiiliiii nnlnli iiuliiii I roil 111 1111111n Iliilini I inilnii 40 o1G/ .A' ; on: sy 'a's �•'or 0 v . t 4 ,tfl NO. 7' V r e• r: 'per 0? ?''! °� .fir w 7 W V- . Q. .1 \I' •' 4 %7 U 4 a I .) Cp ..�\ ` '' t is " . I) ) AO ii a 2. 9i V 0 • z? / OCR • , trf w .._.�. »_ ..�.L .. ..� :. 'a' •c.}._..., . ...r a! :•..ai. 7,.1t/ .� • • = a Qn \ '1 . >cc •z•Wisr! or, N r.. • 4_ .` .r. , 1). .L eft ry •. 1p 1 N ' r O i . iSS't 2, dS f11. .p • �� s< Fl 7 .4/ VA' s!• /r. x 'tt 1 T, ` � 1 t•1 .,, ' ;.� 11 t) •••• • • _ %.V. .i_ • i' •• V File: 35mm Drawing #4 5 sr IOUTIKENTER �' NiVE sd,? °""°' ==• /// i i |v1 ||// / ;/U / | / 1 / | / |[�Y|'�'iU.|U1�'y| / |uV| / |/|/|UVU//4 ||U|||| / ' ' n ' n ' ^� / ' o| ' / ' o | Inch `° � ' '`` �� . . � � -/ �. ��'' ���,���/�. .'. |ypU||U|^�m|U|xpU|�||npU||n|�U||U|upN|UUpU|UUpU|UUpU|UU�U|||`|p|UU1V|m�!||N|p||||UyNIq File: LO1-0051 35mm Drawing #S .25 IN4RE66fEGRE66 EAOEI'EWT �n 140 +1 142 14S IA. 41S 141. 141 146 14! 60 DI 62 653 D4 053'-0" STABILIZED EARTH SLOPE . BIKE PARKING STOR OE SPACE (136 6F. MIN) M b 16 11 b SS CU IPSTER AID ENCLOSURE STABILIZED EARTH, 54 66 66 Si 86 6! 60 61 62 102 103 104 106 106 101 106 TOP CF \ • DITCH \ ••••••• WETLANDS 111 LLSTA001 ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. PATE, 01/31M1 PRELIMINAR1' SITE PLAN 2 WETLANDS PROJECT DATA PARKING REQUIRED, OUTPACE CP RELOCATED PITCNI ZONING, OFFICE (0) LIGHT WILDING AREA (eQ. PTA OPYICE ASSEMBLY LEVEL ONE 11,520 11¢20 LEVEL TWO 23440 • LEVEL THREE 23,440 - TOTAL 56400 11 ,520 • 44520 3,1000 ?:1000 154 10 • 164 PARKING PROVIDED, STANDARD • 132 COMPACT • 26 ACCESSIBLE • 6 TOTAL • 164 WILDING HEIGHT, SI' EXIST. OUTPACE CCFMOH AREA, (CORRIDORS. RESTROOMS. . ETC.) • 126 npmu ' (3 3) 0 IS' 30' 60' 90' USABLE FLOOR AREA • 51.342 10,131 • 61525 i 1 , 1 I•I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I l i l i 2 .. 1•' . .l l Inch I:IG • STCOTT6 ' • 5Ince18727 INTERSTATE 1 -5I TOP OR STREAM 51st AVENUE SOUTH RELOCATED ORCNI PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE: I' a 30'•0" f.1! 1 JIIilll ICI III 1111111 I1IIIII 1 111TH ICI I1II 1 , 1 3 i. , ,1,. •4 'i'I 51 I 1 111 1 6 . H. £ IIIIIIIIII 4 Z IIIIIIiiii IIIIIII 414 O I 6 111111T I I1111111111 I IIIIIIIII I I I1111111111 I 1 I1 i` WOi 111111111 In111111 H IIIIIIII 111111111 IIIII111 11111TH 11111TH 111111111 EXIST, DITCH TO BE RELOCATED EXIST. OUTFACE NORTH P11 1111111111 OCAS IV • NAP SOON MINN •• MOD. Kin ••CD SAUL *OA COMM SUM UM SW. MOM SSW @LADS EAST ELEVATION COLOR LEGEND ALL MSS MS PIMINC1LIND ST SWIM SWIM 1011801111 0111111 ® mum= MSS ® CANINJAN SOW - 1 1 .., 1 7 1 .: 1) , T ., 1 , 11 :. 1p1 , 1111111 5 11111111111111111 Inch 1,113 • . 41 ).11 '11 ' A)(7ESTc • „ yl . t711. Cp. zp. , op. , 16 19 t. 19 I t 117 t IC IZ t IN31 t r /11 11 1 1 III 11 1 11. '1 11 1 • 1. IT ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. 1204 Se rge ...awsrum.04«. 1 1 1 1 1 0 • PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS JCS NS WIWI CAM% CP CISCPCID■ JOI OATS IMMO 0 0 0 ',',••••• SIVIAL MAW — 01Satire ••••::::;; '11 In.n..11 III ••"•„••"•':„•,:' L —I SOUTH ELEVATION MALL VS • Nir ISM SWIM -0 ram woe UJEST ELEVATION •ASI vr • NY L _ _ ------------ SUL CANOPY Mau. —Moe UM SLASNO sagram I I -1 istaixs- COLOR LEGEND AU. COMO MS M SMIPACIUMS ST SIEWN SLUM% • 52:7WSX.::::,'• 0 TOTISMAIT SIMM 0 MOWN ma (e) COMM arm MESE VAll is • I f I I 1.1 I 4 ti l• I 4 .1- I .1 i I 1 11 I 1.111111111111 1 Inch 16 I I '(3 . I 31±' I . 51 I 61 r - • • , • • 1872 r VESTCOTT° '." yr . O 1 6 IL • 9 ..... 19 IC 1Z I. 1 1 , )101 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1111 HU nil NH II UST ARCHITECTS. P.S.C. IMO MS 9 I IMELIMINARY ELEVATICINI5 JCS .r 301••••• DRAM SS COMM MN DAIS MOM Ib• 1 1 1111 1 WETLAND A AREA .• 4840 SO. F 0.11 ACRES w b 0 Z I I (1) E IV oP 111.7 PRIMARY STATE HIGI-MAY NO. 1 (SA. i pai Aigc=a;= ___,■••••■ /NW ,41 Zr 7 ".41 1 t. 51st AVE SOUTH -1 1_11) ' Inch ' 1,1: since 1877 5 6 AVISTCOTT' yp. , , , , op. , , 19 , 19 IC IZ 0 gr -, ------ . . L. I N 2 S. 146TH ST. 162ND ST S 144TH ST. AM 0 & 149TH sT. • 7u SP 83 -17 -55 ,4 .:YAM A../ N AAMA AN MAYA ..IN NWYI M/M M. • .... y . -.... OM MA, �..;x p 1 r. I r l8 ✓ 1 • • ;to .11; 4 j I. f r • , . 1! O IM Ae KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS SW 14-23 -4 THIS MAP I8 FOR 118'PURP088 A80IOrIJO IN LCCATI00 YOUR', PROPER?[ AND Is ROT ovARARl88D V001101 ACCORAT8 8RA8UR1lRT8. Ili - IIII I I 11 11 I' I II ��� 111 III III III III III III III III III ill III I VIII III IIII III � IIIIII I III IIII III III III IIII�I III I IIII�II IIII III�IIIIIIIII�II I III I III III IIII II�III III III�II IIII III III VIII I�I I III III I�I I IIIIIII�II III Sca:rru axr KC 1969 NW 23- SCALE l " =lOOD AMP 141 7-041 14511J6 1471145135 150 151 152 153"'& 15. & 168 6b 161 16S 165 110 111 1•2 1131 n4 VARIES PROJECT DATA TOTAL 73 C 13 0 ZONING1 OFFICE (0/ BUILDING AREA (5CL 74 LEVEL ONE LEVEL TWO LEVEL THREE COMMON AREAI (CORRIDORS, RESTROCMS, ETC.) • E% 00,488) USAISLE FLOOR AREA • 59,432 PARKING REQUIRED 88,432 • 31I000 PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD COMPACT ACCESSIBLE TOTAL BUILDING NEIGHT: •00 79 0 18 0 - 110 4. 180 TYP, 15 74 0 RECYCLING 0: STORAGE SPACE (138 SP. MIN.) • 23040 23,440 • 23,440 . 68,920 ▪ 148 • 28 6 INTERS 1-5 DUMPSTER AND aNcLosures<' HIKE 00, TYP. PARKING 5Ist AVENUE 50UTI-I PARTIAL SITE PLAN SCALE, I" • 30'-0" . 0 IS' 30' 60' '90' NORTH SE7•84 0 4.1, 7 7 1 1 1 4 a. , 7 1 I / 8 WETLANDS • Av Egr c2 rr • . '•• • 1 MINZO 4141 LLS T110 M ARCHITECTS P.S.C. 9 0 2475 AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 98003 TEL: 025.455.3203 425. 35.05 4conzeinostrom corn 8 1 5 1 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN • JOI 5 NOI 2000090 DRAUNI 117. 05 CHECKED8 J814 DATE 010601 -Q STEEL OH DOOR HM. DOOR kr, at - REVEAL (DTP.) a FA! rkx •-0I SMOOTH FNr6N CONCRETE - ANOO. ALUM. FRAME WITH TINTED GLATNG 6MOOTH �NI6H CONCRETE NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SCALE, fro• • P.m. -0 ETEEL CANOPY - FRAME WITH TINTED GLAZING; e CORNICE i Ill�gf�l lil ii 111nlllu� it lilt II I,Il l ill Ip qi ql ql III Ili III IP lal IP ql ,•„ I li ' zf. I'. �i- - <� -�I I s� I I I e� AIRTCOTT" -1 t t't n�mdul7iudwi�ilBllui�nuLni�uldm�indWl�unluu�iwlnll�ilnhw�uu6ul�uulun�nulluliminu�iudnn�nullni� w -0 RiOO'TH PNIEN CONCRETE rid A —I1zl s i r It CORNICE Ph COLOR LEC,END ALL COLORS ARE A6 MAN{FACTURED 6Y 6NER TN WILLIAM& Q TOUNHCUSE TAN 611EIE6 0 WILDROSE 6002292 • Q CARNELIAN EETIE& ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. 919 24111 AVE NE BELLEVUE, WA 95005 TEL 25. 55.3203 mA cemolroll,trem corn 2 9 PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS JOS NO 2000090 DRAW& CA. CHECKED, JGH DATE, 01!31/01 F4.01 I I1 Z` -0 CORNICE r REVEAL (TM SMOOTH FINISH CONCRETE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 110' • 1'•0' WEST ELEVATION SCALE VIP • 1'-0 mock ALUM FRAME WITH TINTED GLAZNG CCONCRETE ISN L - - - - COLOR LEGEND ALL COLORS ARE AS MANIPACTIIRED 5Y SNERWIN WILLIAMS 0 TCUNNOUSE TAN =We 0 MOROSE 6U12S2 p. CARNELIAN SID21015 ROOF 3RD _ l9 2ND !DT –I ----- � ID AVERAGE EMIEN GRADE I'li illiflT l �N�I.IIIIllll l.l!I_13Ii IIIIII II����4II II,III �I II ��III 1 1 1 �IIII1l lillll I I NI III IIII III�III (IIII III IIII III�III III III III III III�III IIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIII SCOMZO AALI.S Tit om ARCHITECTS P.S.C. 919 2•TH AVE NE DELLEWE, WA noes TEL: 25,455.3203 FAX: 25.455.935 m,Aeauo an4tlom,eem �Q k tg tg t'RELIMMARY ELEVATIONS J05 NOI 2000090 DRAW, CJP CNECKED1 JGN DATEI 01/31/01 F4.02 . i ..0 ... \ 1251 \ mg E - L •• `.. E - 0 16' 32 4D' 0 Es' ID' 32' 4S FINISH GRADE FINISH GRADE -- 110' ------ ---------- -- ------- _ ----- 'A' EAST-WEST BUILDING/SITE CROSS-SECTION SCALE, 1/16" • I'-0" '5' NORTI-I-SOUTI-1 BUILDING/SITE CROSS-SECTION SCALE. 1/16" • I 92 ----------- ------------ 90 ! I'li i tl 'OPM 7119 • 1 J' i !II I 4 I tH "11" l ii ti l"11"1"11" 81 AXICTC17, : 7 11111111113111113111111111111111111111111111711111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111411111111111111111111111111 92 EXIST. 2 GRADE 1415' 25.0 940' s Aft EXIST. 2 • GRADE TOP HANDRAIL 2., DIA OD, TT•, VERTICAL RAIL 5EYOND r DIA. OD. rm. INTERMEDIATE HANDRAIL I Or DIA OD. TT?. WELD WIRE 14E614 TO TOP I 6711. RAIL • EXPANSION COLT SIDEWALK , SECT ION AT GUARDRAIL g =ALE. 314. • I'MSX 414ILLST1OM ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. 9 0 I24TH AVE N BELLEVUE, WA 98005 119, 42%459.32w FAX: 425. 55. 35 Inm.sconicholl4Nem.eorn a 2 BUILDING/ SITE CROSS- SECTION JOD NO. 2EXDCDOW DRAM cJ 0.1ECKED1 J01.1 DATE 1 01/31101 F4.03 5 till rtt Landscape Architecture ;.nAronmerrht..5ervices WWWSTFESTUDIO.COM PRO (42$ 713843926a 425 671.0647r PO BOX 1642 DLNALL W/1813010 Hugh G. Goldsmith Consulting Engineers. • Bellevue, WA 98004 • P.O. Box 3565'. • . Bellevue, WA 98009 ',.. 12i1AloallSIMI:111MaSAMGAII.AvAlgAllitKi2410..., p•AD 'SP; lig I I h 4 w._. ._..., . ' ---- I 7,'—'•. I . =c•cm-:;:),:so TC K= ST Fi..6,Cr.E. F4FKN " ;=4CE IAT'DAWN 114.5111OT DITECT AEON TODD WALKER I 7C/ & Associates, Inc. Surveyors . Planners TEL: (425) 462.1080 FAX: (425) 462.7719 ( 10' SCALE 1.20' 20' 30 40' Rov161011 to Prolmunary Plan DESCRIPTION IEV. NO DATE 1/16/01 t2/03/0 MILANO 'A' FROVRE L'EA AT DrIttEVANCE TO ROOT ZONE O EXITING TREE 01.111- QF 741.11_0C. 47W DITCH DETLAND BUFFF.R, LitIT CV CLEARING (' C.ONS.' WALK COM CIVIL FLANS) Rovieion to Prelrcrunery Plan MADE BY igives CHECKED PLOTTED:. SCALE: V' 20' VIEW: DATE: 04/18/01 • ACAD %REF FLO BR: PSSF: 5157 AVE 6OUTH ID STn-At•I DIFFER PROVIDE 14" HT. BERM AT LAM AA M; TO SMM. VIRCNTAW Eklealt.6 VEMTATION OUTSIDE OF LIMIT C* CLEARING Towel, EXISTI1 VEC='.:7ATICN OUTINDE cf LrmIT OF CLEARING TO RismAN— AT..„57„g5. , .. 0: . --- CIVIL _ I • __— __— : LIMIT EARING m.--- i --- . A '::: S' SW' 014 TO-5CV -D bore. wrioRoe_.7-45%2 1 ....., jki /111P,A141111K1111p,p.) mt_ri tkfi: I. IIIPa ."-'''gh'-jl.IIUIP■:47:4:.....c.1111/jl!_Tov,_r17_PSIF:%r:":r:C70:C:t4:.'PVa:C:j,l'CI'Vjf° ....■-• "01)---Altr=r1P.iri ..z7.1r-;'119 — _ - ..• . flik_ i OPUS N.W. L.L.O. - DEMAND 5' EXISTDes TE TO r arP.) SO' MILANO 5t. EXITI T1 TO EST•IAIN (TYR) AF-tiES ; -3' ( )' Ivl . N . ) L1111 CE CLEARD6.CTTVW t ' SEE ...IVIL -:...:_____ 1 _..„) T. DITC TO SF_ F-ZEL O4TEE JOB NO. r,"„ 1 ipor ■ " r,),' It ro p 3 Stir/ Landscape Architecture Idlviron ment3L .5ervlces W W ITE5n101O.COM PROJECTaS tE6NOIO.COM (425/7598325P1425/ 571.0547r PO BOX 1642 DUVAL- WA 98019 JASON WALKER 2 ^ /o / � q Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. � Consult Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.G. Box 3565 Bellevue, WA 98009 TEL: (425) 462.1080 FAX: (425) 462.7719 REV. NO DATE I V16/01 2 12/03/01 -t— O I PIN. 7 It DIA. ROO1DALL CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL NTS lfl _ I I—LfI ��i I l iTi II —R7 1 1m -1 i i T[ PREVAILM3 WIC PLAN PREV4ILNG • WM PIN. 2 x DIA ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS TREE °LANTING DETAIL NTS O SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL NTS a d d O DESCRIPTION ems-- -CEDAR STAKES aL ALL so --CEDA STARE. P ANT TREES I" NIGHER TAW: DE°M1I GRATIN M NURSERY. TREE PIT MALL Not. es Leek. THAN (L TRES ROOT BALL C/A WATER 114COS LY MR0e PL NTIRYa. TREE STARS PERPENDICULAR TO PREVAILING WIND. 2 x 2 CEDAR STAIRS D GA WM TWIST TO TIGHTEN V2' DIA BLACK ISIBBER ROBE M. CUT ALL TIES AC POLO BA= BURLAP PROM UPPER U3 OP RDOIBNL REMOVE ALL PLASTIC AND TORE 2" DEPTH MULCH LAYER 3" WATER BARN PNISN GRACE ECARPY SIDES AND BOTTOM CP PLAITING PIT TO Avow FOR ROOT PENETRATION TOPSOIL BACKPILL RECa1PACTED NATIVE SOIL .DAR STARS es —CEDAR STAKES NOTE- MAW Hews I" NIGHER THAW DEPNN GROIN N NURSERY. TREE PIT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN CV TIM ROOT BALL DIAMETER TT STAKES RPENDICII -AR 2 x 2 CEDAR STARS 0 GA WIPE 1111I6T TO TIONTh'l N" DIA BLACK RUBBER HOSE TTP. Off ALL TIES AC FOLD SACK BURLAP PROM UPPER Ili OP ROOTLIALL REMOVE ALL PLASTIC AND TWINE 2" MLCH LAYER 3" WATER BASIN PINION GRADE ACAIA Y AIDED AND BOT7Cli CP FOOR O ROOT pt IT TRATIGN u TOPSOIL BACKFILL RECCMPACTED NATIVE SOIL RelOYE T} BALM. AND TIMM ROO O.L TOI' IrS OF 3' WATE 1346N NISH GRADE 2" MULCH LAYER TOPSOIL BAa?ILL BREAK AIDES AID BO ToM6 CP F PLANTING ROOT P P PPHEIR4TICNN � Rc0•1 ACTED NATIVE ROIL Revision to Preliminary Plan Revision to Preliminary Plan MADE NY CHECKED PLOTTEDI. LANDSCAPE GENERAL NOTES L PROTECTION OF SITE Locate all exutlnq a nd new underground utility ines prior to any construction. Save and protect exist) trees designa remain. Repair any damage done to curbing, sidewaNu, fences, and any other dama caw as rout of the contract. 2.8U!•GR4DE PREPARATION Remove from cats all Invasive weeds lieu r ss, blackberry, scotch broom and rode rocks/debris Sant than a I" elm ham slanting depth a ' rea pmor to 1�lean topsoil uncovered end as uncovered during tilling end planing III all planting ereee to a an df 6 prior to tr aeemet of topeoll unless otherwise not On an(s). Save and protstet ii dxleltng mobb willow and vegetation ate esm restoration areas. 3. TOPSOIL Imported topsoil shall bs a prepared 2 way o r winter mix tooppsoil from an apppproved CR Cial her. Provide 3' minimum depth In all Ian areas. Provide 10 minimum dapWi in all snub peas, mini daTath gqroundcover arsae. Rovlds t oted topsoil to depth only in planting areas outside of arm existing tress w t o loo o main Pocket plant nw and groundeove7 with topsail back/ill in planting iareee tit occur 4. MULCH sM H Provide 2" depth medium d. fir bark mulch in all shrub and groundcover areas. 5. GRAD Landscape ING Contractor to be responsible for maintaining finish gra in all planting arses as indicated on lane, in typical details and oros4- seetlone and as ducuesed oaring meetings. Verify oveion of rough gr b8 general contractor or Amer to plural ore talth foot Notify 's rani, OT 8 RU dear snag or potential attracts or sub rads drainage problems prior to starting work For turf areas inlsh face by raking smooth and even,1ightly eompdct With roll level out surface undulations And irregularities. 6. PLANT MAIALS e ll p she I canrorm to code or standards set forth m the latest edition or American Society for Nursery All deciduous tress with single trvfs to be size and variety as specified in plant legend, straight trurked, eymmetrically branched, with branches pruned for lead clearance. A ll evergreen trees to be size and variety as specified in plant legend with full symmetrical branching lots g out All plant material to be rursrugrown and purcheeed by contractor to match within each variety in size, quality and character as indicaved in plats legend See Size and Remarks. All ggroundcover planting to be triangularly spaced on center as indicated in plant legend throughout deaTgmtad planting areas to dripline of lbw branching Shrubs and evergreen trees. • Plant material not matching these requirements shall be rejected. 1. FERTILIZER Fertilize all plant material with 11q � reform' tablets. Provide (4) tablets per tree, (2) per shrub, and (U er Orotaideovd. Place tablets around Football after badtrtlleg by 50% for trek shrub and grotadcover p For tirf applications apply 16-24 -I6 starter fertilizer at the race of 10 pounds per 1000s f. Apply col ite limestone at the rate of 30 pounds per 1000ef, rake to incorporate. 8. SOIL POLYMER Provide 'boil Moist' or approved alternate. Provide (3) ounces per caliper inch of tree truck diameter. Provide (I) oaks per a and in ounce per gro nd:over. Add soil po yf nor to backfill mix or tress, orrice and e � round aer. For For turf application& distribute at the rate of (6) pounds per 10004f. broadcast with a drop 2r eeds and ensure evert disbursement Till the polymer into the toil to a mmimun depth of 4 inches. . STAKING AND GUYING See typical planting details. 10. SOD Sod lawn e one application shell be JB instant lawn, Country Green Farms, or approved alternate. Sod shall be cut within 24 hours of i etillatton on site. II. ovid the designated ) of the Landscape Plan at the following raise of elurry- Seed one Seed (see Plant Legend for r seed mix end nd tip ap on rater). Pertllizer , 10 -10 -20 with tree tort at 40 lbs. s. per er acre. dromu( PT dt, *live- Fibre' by Weyerhaeuser for equal) at 1,600 lbs. per acre. Lim to achieve a pH between 5 and 1 Water, 5600 allons per acre. Tackler, at 40 lbs. par acre on elopes greater than 40%. 12. I RRIGATI All planting a rose shall d b an tio irrigation e�ete Irrigation shell include trenched t m r " p th Pro Pn requirements R 1 Insp pe h ma nos s and Bird 200 laterals PGA d to 12" in. depth Provide Rain Bt to I serres e c & he. n, heeds do and s0 and n s s and Rain Br F or A enda series automatic remote control valves. Controller x on to be a Il a Total t sense wilo free zones or zones abovbov e the a Sion Ren a future expansion. head head o a l ve be e located d and d mounted Curer app Irrigation ey ehill System Shall have complete head to he coverage with s amts :ones for r north, south east and west exposu as well as lawn and shrub /ground Bens. eas. No�czels shall be adjusted to provide o aiist e ca coverage with minimum ovrepprI'ayy. Irrigation ewwtem shell have automatic rein shut off. Irrigation stern bid Shall include first wear wlntrizati N icy co Sir blow -out and aprng start -up. Ircigeti contractor to ovido as -built drawing showing locations of all main lines, laterals, vlaves and indication of zones. Irigtion contractor to provide a One year warranty against defects in material's and workmanship. 13. MAINTENANCE Landscape Contractor to maintain all planting areas until final acceptance of the job Owner. the Oun. During dumbed, period all damaged, dead, dabed, di in or broken plant materials shall be replaced immediately by the Landscape Contractor at no additional co lt to the owner. Site shall be maintained during landscape construction to keep site clean of excess soil or excavation on paved areas. Landscape Contractor to coodnate with Best Management Practices of the jurisdiction of the site. 13. WARRANTY Landscape Contractor shall warrant the purchaser that all new and restored lawns and pews Brssnl stock plant materiels such as grubs, trees, flows and ground cover shall, at the time of installation, be freer from defects due to disease or damage planting. This cawe loy_m or improper u warranty shall be for a period of ONE TEAR sus test DATE te CIF FINAL the cause o a d d or ed condition. oun right, at its 14 CLEAN UP Prior to final acceptace and payment, the Landscape Contractor shall remove from site all trash and debris caused as a result of this contract and shall pressure wash or wet broom all soil from pavement • SCALE: I" . 30' DATE: 04/18/01 DRAWN JTW DESIGNED: JTW APPROVED* JTW ACAD DWG.: VIEW* XREF: LIF' FLO SKI PO si PSSFt PLANT LEGEND SYMPJOL QUAN. CITY OF NAME THUJA licate 'Encino' Ex Western Red Cedar p Douglas SUGA menziesii Fir TFNJJA occidentalis 'Smagqgard' Emerald Green Arborvitae TI4UJA occide tali& '8ma Bard' Emerald Green Arborvitae 5ENLUB ja unnontit JGCquemoltttl Birch PRUNUS a'Thindercloud' Thundercloud Flowering Plitt PT•RII9 calleruana 'Chanticleer' ChaMieiser canner Flowering Pea Corte L4 r uea m Faeigiata' ACER circiMtutl Vine Maple 5ALIX seemt IIis Bolt Leaved wtreambark Willow PRUNUS L'8chickeenets' Rweien Laurel PINUS mughp tyrolien Strain' Compactf1ughb Pine EUCNYMUS elate 'Compacts' Compact Ernirig man MYRICA californica Pacific Wax Myrtle MAHCNIA a uifolium Oregon Grape R HODODENDRON 'Cumingham A ZA EA Flame Creeper' PHOFMILM telex 'Ribue' Red NOW Zsland Flax ROSA rutkana Nootke Roes CORJUS stolonifera Red Twig Dogwood CCoAULTFIERIA shallop ARCTTQ TTAPHYLO8 uva -ursi RUMS cal. 'Emerald Carpet' Taiwan Creeping Bramble Low Growing Erosion Control Hydroeeed Sod Lawn NON INDICATES QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL TO BE DETERMINED BY LANDBCA E CONTRACTOR 51M5OL GJANTITIEB ON PLAN HAVE PICEDENCE OVER QUANTITIES CALLED CUT IN LEG =END IF DISCPANCIES EXIST. TUKWILA PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OPUS N.W. •L. L. C SIZE AND REMARKS 6' Mm. Ht. Full Spaced Per Plan b' Min. Ht Full spaced par Plan e -1' Min. Ht, shear to column Spaced Per Plan 4 -5' Min. Ht, shear to column Spaced Per Plan 2" Cal, Matched Character spaced Per Plan 2" Cal, Matched Character Spaced Per Plan 2" Cal,Matched Character r Spaced Per Plan 2" Cal, Matched Character, Low Branded Spaced Per Plan 4 -5' 14t, Clump Spaced Per Plan 3 -4' Ht, CIumP 8peced Per Plan gral. 30" NT. Mm 24 QC, Trim to Fl e d ge IS" f1in. HL 36' OC. 5 Ga1.18 -24" Ht 3 36" O.C.. BO PZ Plan 5 Gal. IS -24" Ht &paced Per Plan Blush' &pectic( P er Plan eptisd Per Plan � Pe Pl S dHPerMPla Canes on Min. Ht, Mn. (3) Canes opened Per Plan I Gal. Colt Min. 8" ht 336 t ams/ at ular to driphne Gal. ConL Min. (8)12" e o6 trees/ elnetular to online I Ggl. Cont. Min. (8) 12" rumens 3 tr r et uler to crying Submit seed spec. for approval Submit Sod /seed spec. for approval OPUS N.W. L.L.C. WASHINGTON JOB NO. SHEET L -2 , N�ili�i }1�i)I Ililili�IUl )t Ililili il,l Ir Ili�ijl iN�ili IN ill III Ili Its III III IN� A( fir:: q ... F ". •:.. _ I I III I I lli I I iI IIIliiiI IIII I �I IIIIIIII �IIIIIIIII�IIIpI I II�IIIIII I II�III I II IIIII I I III I I I �I I I I II II I II I I I II I I I lI I I I II I I I�I I I I II I I I �I I I I II I I I II I I I II 11I �I I I I TYPE III STREAM OS 1333 3 32 '0 , 5 12 105.5 101.0 06 5 •1001 .,04 9 OP 7 TP - S .1044 20% SLOPE AREA (TAP.) M454 0 1a 6' 49.3 . ' MOO STEPS M99 .9 W0 1300 9ai STS WETLA 0 A .en •eu " a.o e9A ° 113 1130 13 af6e CL DITCH NO BUFFER 901 90.7 a TP -4 OB.? TP•3 19.3 0111 1394 ee4 •76 OHM .T7 67.5 IS' BUFFER .a54 'eel • ' BUFF 96 2 101.0 0x.1 •J 66 95.7 52 M TP -2 (TYP,) • 'we T PE III STREAM '90 6 91] TOP OF BANK EXISTING STRUCTURE (TYP,) N : 8 °41'44 150.610, 03 6 1221 u 135 132.0 13 4. °4, :1 E 106.3 'Hen 0° °, 09+35° W 262.85 .06.7 .136 72� et 0 90.7 e2.5 ;o•7 WET AN 116, Alerv° 59 69 1:37 RES ' TOP DITCH /STREAM A ) 90,7 1 SECTMO CORNER l 1 F .L. OOt9 I 7.G 005; PROJECT AREA A (EL. 00� 674 -4 m L. '0 41= = SOUTH (5(x) STREET °BENCHMARK EXISTING BSMH RIM • SOB I.E. GTR. CHANNEL • 73,1 SCALE: I • 200' LEGEND b FH •• UTILITY POLE 6--- BUY WIRE O TELE MH a MAIL BOX • WATER METER SION W WATER VALVE O TYPE II CATCH BASIN O TYPE I CATCH BASIN O DRILL HOLE • TEST PIT (TERRA) • TEST HOLE IOREOBERO) SLOPES 20B OR GREATER 15. 60 0 30 SCALE: I" • 30' MIN ( 120 • JNOTE9 I. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS TO ASSIST OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. IN EVALUATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES. 2. DATUM HORIZONTAL: NAB 83/91 HELD THE COORDINATE FOR THE WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 -23-4 PER KING COUNTY SURVEY SECTION CONTROL DATABASE. VERTICAL: CITY OF TUKWILA BENCHMARK: INVERT OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE APPROXIMATELY 125' EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 0121 IN SO. 151ST STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. RIM ELEVATION - 90.0 FEET NOTE: CHECKED TO PUBLISHED I.E. TO WEST OF 75.5 FEET, 0,1 FOOT. 3, ACCEPTED UNRECORDED SURVEY BY SCHROETER A ASSOC. FOR OVERALL BOUNDARY, GOLDSMITH HAS TRAVERSED FROM WEST QUARTER CORNER TO NORTHWEST SECTION CORNER AND CHECKED TO EXISTING CORNERS BY OTHERS WITH ACCEPTABLE RESULTS. 4. BOUNDARY CALCULATIONS: THE BEARING OF NORTH LINE OF THE SCHROETER SURVEY (SOUTH MARGIN SO. 146TH STREET) WAS HELD AS THE SAME BEARING AS THE SOUTH LINE OF PLAT OF STERLING ADDITION (COMMON LINE OF TRACTS 3 AND 4 OF SEATTLE LAND CO. S ACRE TRACTS). THE BALANCE OF THE INTERIOR EAST -WEST LOT LINES WERE PRORATED BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LINE AND THE LINE COMMON TO TRACTS 7 AND 8 OF SAID PLAT (NORTH MARGIN OF SO. 151ST). THE OVERALL EAST BOUNDARY (WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY OF 1 -5) IS SHOWN PER SCHROETER SURVEY. UPON REVIEW OF THE %SOOT RIGHT-0 IS PLANS THIS LINE MAY CHANGE SLIGHTLY. THE NORTH -SOUTH LINE BETWEEN TAX LOT 0091 AND 0093 IS SUBJECT TO VARIOUS INTERPRETATIONS AS TO LOCATION, FURTHER RESEARCH AND EVALUATION WOULD BE REQUIRED IN THE EVENT THAT A DEFINITIVE LOCATION OF THIS INTERIOR LINE BECOMES CRITICAL. 5, EASEMENTS: TWO EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFFECT /ENCUMBER THE OVERALL PROPERTY AND BOTH AFFECT TAX LOT 0030. I) A.F. 6299225, SOUTH 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES 2) A.F. 8701270488, SOUTH 25 FEET AND EAST 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES THE BENEFITTING PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 0029 AND TAX LOT 0031, IF THESE PARCELS WERE MERGED INTO TAX LOT 0030, THE EASEMENT WOULD BE EXTINGUISHED. 8. EIGHT TITLE REPORTS WERE RECEIVED FROM TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND EVALUATED AS FOLLOWS: TAX I) 870145' 0520 10/23/2000 DATE OF 0031 0195 2) 670146 0030 10/23/2000 3) DUDICOMMITMENT OOFI 12/00 12/20 PROJECT AREA A SUPPLEMENT #1 TO 2ND COMMITMENT COMMITMENT 1/8/21301 4) 870143 0091 10/23/2000 5) 870142 0093 10/23/2000 6) 870141 0092 10/23/2000 7) 870139 009D 10/23/2000 0094 0120 PROJECT AREA B 8) 870140 0121 10/23/2000 9) NO REPORT 0205 NO REPORT SUPPLEMENT 41 TO 2ND COMMITMENT COMMITMENT TO ORDER 4'870144 ELIMINATED A PREVIOUS ACCESS EASEMENT PER A.F. 45555886 7. WETLANDS, DITCHES, AND /OR STREAMS SHOWN HEREON WERE IDENTIFIED AND /OR DELINEATED BY A.J. BREOBERO AND ASSOCIATES IN DECEMBER 2000, AND JANUARY 2001 AND SURVEYED BY GOLDSMITH A ASSOCIATES IN THE SAME PERIOD. PRELIMINARY WETLAND AND /OR STREAM DUFFERS ARE SHOWN BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE WETLAND BIOLOGIST AND IS SUBJECT TO REVISION. 8. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON JANUARY 2001 AND IS CURRENT TO THAT DATE ONLY. 9. SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 20% AND GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT ARE SHOWN HEREON AS INTERPOLATED FROM A TRIANGULAR IRREGULAR NETWORK OF THE SITE TOPO. 10. PROJECT AREA A AND PROJECT AREA B B•,:NDARIES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AS THE PROJECT PROCEEDS : OWARD CONSTRUCTION. LEGAL OESCRIPTIONS; PROJECT AREA A (PER TRANSNATION TITLE REPORT NOS, 870148 AND 870144) THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING'AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 150 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE OF 199.25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH TRACT 5 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. I (SRS) BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS, 5484213 AND 5528319, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO, 5581902; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PROJECT AREA B (PER TRANSNATION TITLE REPORT NOS. 870139 AND 870140) TRACT 7 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 694285, FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO, 1; SITUATE IN CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. TOTAL WETLAND AREA PER DREDBERD B ASSOC, • 1.46 ACRES Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 90004 P.O. Boa 3585 TEL: (425) 462 -1000 Bellevue, WA 90009 FAX: (425) 462 -7719 REV. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE MADE BY CHECKED 6 07/13/0115143 VIEW: OJ %REF: 00112 %01 LIFT 00112001 FLD OK, 2440 PLOTTED, 001 /2%0444 LADAM SCALE: I' • 30' DATE: 7/13/01 DRAWNI LCA DESIGNED: APPROVED: OCR /BPF ACAO DWG,, 00112%01,628 PO Al I - PSSF, OOII2P I'1 ic. i � i�� . .iinpl OPUS N.W. L.L.C. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON JOB NO. 00112 SHEET C -1 I; j111li I q N( 1 1111) 1 9 I. 0 . 11111 y 1 = 1 4 l I III I 11 5I 111111l I 111 I 11 6I •West' U 1 . • 4 44 a . • Z1111111IIII111IIII111111111I111111111I111111111 11111111111111111( 1IIII111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111IIII111111111I � 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. (� Consulting Engineers • Surveyors Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE • Bellevue, Yu 98004 P.O. Box 3585 TEL: 425 482 -1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425; 482 -7719 REV. 110. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED PLOTTED: 00112X02,dRg LADAMS 07/13/01 I5:44 • ' "'• 1. ... '1466,, �' C• R �' i c 0 ° K;` OPUS N.W. L.L.C. J OB NO. 00112 44 CO � °• " 1 " ` 4 xo • 1 . 4' : 8f • :suss a �•'• ' N4L L 5., 'AND m@D:SS to /9/ SENSITIVE 'AREA AND TREE SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON SHEET ^� n V G S CALE: I' • 30' VIEW: DJ • DATE: 7/13/01 %REF: 00112 %02 DRAWN: DTB LIF: 00112X02 lt \ . • . 41 '• 4•• / *Ai �'k4L i..,:0 , DUe rG /9. /Dq_ n,,,.,, DESIGNED: FLD OK: 2490 APPROVED: GCR /BPF PO II 1.25 ACRD DWG,: 00112X02,dv4 PSSF: 00112PCpu... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,1' TYPE IR STREA / TOP DITCH /STREAM III Ili III 1(I �I�II Ijl III �jl. !11 iii IJI III Ili ICI III Ili ill III III III III ICI III III m<n ;,,o 31 ', 5 I ., . ...4� r I I 6I ell rll Cll .911: Lll IIL 011 IB . IB . ••. It ID I9 Ir IC Iz II rv0I . n nu6m HNlun uuhw un6Nl mduu nulu n n6m un6m mdun mdnn unlNli uuluu un6m unhw nnhni • NOTES I. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS TO PROVIDE AN INVENTORY OF ALL TREES 4. OR GREATER IN SIZE WITHIN PROPOSED PROJECT AREA A ANO PROPOSED PROJECT AREA B. 2. DATUM HORIZONTAL: NAD T13/91 HELD THE COORDINATE FOR THE WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23.23 -4 PER KING COUNTY SURVEY SECTION CONTROL DATABASE. VERTICAL: CITY OF TUKWILA BENCHMARK: INVERT OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE APPROXIMATELY 125' EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 0121, IN S0. 151ST STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. RIM ELEVATION • 90,0 FEET NOTE: CHECKEO TO PUBLISHED I.E. TO WEST OF 75.5 FEET, , 0.1 FOOT. 3. ACCEPTED UNRECORDED SURVEY BY SCHROETER B ASSOC. FOR OVERALL BOUNDARY. GOLDSMITH HAS TRAVERSED FROM WEST QUARTER CORNER TO NORTHWEST SECTION CORNER AND CHECKED TO EXISTING CORNERS BY OTHERS WITH ACCEPTABLE RESULTS. PROJECT AREA BOUNDARIES ARE GRAPHIC DEPICTIONS ONLY ANO 00 NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL SURVEYED BOUNDARIES. ORIPLINES SHOWN ARE AVERAGE AREAS AS OETERMINEO BY FIELD OBSERVATION IN MARCH AND APRIL 2001. , 6. TREE SIZES SHOWN ARE DIAMETER OF TRUNK 4.5' ABOVE OROUND. LEGEND TREE SURVEY COMPLETED DECIDUOUS TREE FIELD DETERMINED DRIP LINE i 1 CONIFEROUS TREE 0 15 60 I 30 SCALE: I' • 30' 1E0 m RI Eirstif 220' `.:'ACCESS PO T VAULT.ITYP.) FG 108,0 STORMWATER TRENCH IM (tYP.) BOTH LO BAYS 0.0 • IE•6 "'OUT TO SET VAU "LOCK BLOCK•ITYP.j 0 • / '- RETAINING WALL °' R TYPE IL SYSTEM AEM OR LLAL RIM . fl; • 85.0 ARMOR OUTFALL, WITH RIP -RAP 12L• B •X 2' THIf SLEEVE 18 S0 THROU011 • ■ II . , , z ^��. I =- CURB 20' RIGHT -OF- AY �IL>• 47‘e, M �7�SD TO � @ FCOWCIN p 4 p A� a t er II PROPOSED CLEARING LIMIT (TYP.) 50' BUFFER TOP OF BANK 'LOCK BLOCK (T.TP.)" RETAINING WALL STEM OR EQUAL L ' E CO/ 1" ;• : ..... 5 .4116;;J .. WETLAND B IS'. BUFFER;.'j;: • —:= - _ • /%/ ' ' '• IB' SD OUTFALL / •'/TO EXISTING SITS PROPOSED CLEAJ7ING• . ARMOR OUTFALl, WITH LIMIT (TYP') /. RIP -PAP 12 %! B W a 2' SICK 0 15 60 30 SCALE: I" • 30' 120 (tow egioesse4 wwnlwo srvayra OW POINT / • 103.55 / I i NOT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS (BUILDINGS AND PAVING) ARE SHOWN PER SITE PLAN RECEIVED FROM SCONZO ARCHITECTS 3/23/01. PROPOSES.CLEARING LIMIT (TYP,,_. ,-, AT•NOR ,LIMIT FRONTAGE JMPROVEMENT FOR 'POSSIBLE/ LULURE.CONNEGT\R ' - / TE HIGHw AY NO. 1 (s .R , 5 ST pRIMAR A I FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT FACE NEW VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER 14 EAST OF CENTERLINE IMPROVEMENT. BACK OF NEW 6' WALK 20.5'' EAST OFE CONE EXISTING CENTERLINE IMPROVEMENT C4 Aft0T70P7 of PROPOSES STREAM CENTERLINE IB' SEEP AT CENTER WITH 3:1 S1DE SLOPES 14.5' EACH SIDE) 1250 LF • APPROX. 1.0% HYOROSEEO FOR STABILITY OR OR MITIGATION PLANK PLANTING • (:R R. . TYPE II ---- - - - --- --. . — .. C TYPE I LOW POINT EXISTING STORM /4/00/.' EWAr, ourA•AC O/12'w /wagon 7C ,6 �to(4f ON ■I#. STORMWATER COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DROP (INTERIOR 220' LONG • 2Y WIDE) TOP LID • 89.0 DEMON WATER SURFACE • 87.0 WATER QUALITY WATER SURFACE • 82.0 BOTTOM VAULT VARIES ;• 570 REVD DETENTION VIL. • 0.58 Ac.FI. REO'D WATER QUALITY VOL. • 0.29 Ac.FI. 51st AVE SOUTH IS' SO OUTFALL TO TOP EXISTING PITCH /FENCELINE IE • BI.O ARMOR OUTFALL, WITH RIP -RAP 12 L . B W • 2' .-13AI N EXIST. 15100 NEW TYPE II CB IN EAST OF CENTER LINE IMPROVEMENTS REPLACE / TYPE I AS NECESSARY I COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY DROP TRANSITION TO EXISTING_ ROAD SECTION, 13 SOUTHERN LIMIT OF FULL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS 0/ / OCI Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, 14A 98004 P.O. Sox 3585 TEL: (425) 462-1080 Bellevue, IYA 98009 FAX: (425 ) 462 -7719 DESCRIPTION REV. 110. DATE MADE BY CHECKED PLOTTED: 50112.04.555 LADAMS 07/13/0113:36 • SCALE: ' I` • 30' DATE: 7/13/01 DRAWN: LCA DESIGNED: BPF APPROVED: KJO ACAD DW0.1 00112E04.d•9 VIEW: OJ XREF: LIP/ 00112E04 FLO BK: PO /I PSSFI 00112P I%ID'1RC0 2/2/03 I PRELIMINARY GRADING, PAVING, 8( DRAINAGE PLAN FOR • OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA OPUS N.W. L.L.C. WASHINGTON JOB NO. 00112 SHEET C- 3 1 I l l n 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . � Y j ' fl I I I l 0 1 ' 0 I ! I ' 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I , 1 ' 1 J 14 I l i , l 'I I I II I I I5� 11 I I I 1 11 11111 • �VCSfC07T F r • •I I CI 2I II OI O 9 d 9I I' C 2 I' MO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I111111111I111111111I111111111I111111111I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I111111111I1111 1 1111I111111111I111111111I111111111I111111111I111111111I 0 100 400 200 SCALE: I • 200' 600 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3565 TEL: (425) 462 -1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 462 -7719 REV. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION MADE BY CHECKED ADJACENT OWNERSHIPS TAX STR IDM NAME BADDRESS 004000 0831 JAMES D OCONNOR; 4819 8148TH ST; SEATTLE, WA 98188 004000 0838 JAMES 18 H MARGARET ANGLE; 4831 8148TH ST; TUKWILA, WA 98168 004000 0640 JAMES 18 H MARGARET ANGLE; 4831 8 146TH ST; TUKWILA, WA 98168 0040000845 NARDITO M FERRER; 14118 43RD AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 98188 0040000647 REX W BOYD;14831 5113T AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 96168 004000 0650. HAZEL M KETCHERSID; 14837 51ST AVE S; SEATTLE, WA 90168 004000 0655 HAZEL H KETCHERSID; 14637 51STAVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 96188 004000 0680 HAZEL M KETCHERSID; 14837 51ST AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 96168 004200 0147 LILLIAN M MOTT; 24921 B; KENT, WA 98031 004200 0160 W C 8 JODINE S MANAGO 4820 S 150Th ST; TUKWILA. WA 98188 004200 0153 HOAI CONG 8 HIEN DINH; 4818 S 160TH 8T; SEATTLE, WA 96188 004200 0165 RONALD CB DAWN CSTEWARTJR.;4816 8150TH ST; TUKWILA, WA 98188 0042000160 PHIWPHB DONNA JSWANBERG;14809 5113T AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 98188 0042000170 MELVIN E 8 MYRTLE ROBERSON; PO BOX68543; SEATTLE, WA 98168 004200 0170 MELVIN E 8 MYRTLE ROBERSON; PO BOX 88543; SEATTLE, WA 98168 004200 0180 MARC D & RONALD ENG; 4836 8160TH ST; TUKWILA, WA 98188 004200 0393 GREGORY KONTOS; 4819 8160TH 8T; TUKWILA, WA 98188 004200 0394 JERRY R 8 CAROL J KENT; 7337 44TH AVE SW; SEATTLE, WA 98138 004200 0400 DELLERT J CHENEY; PO BOX 244; AZALEA, OR 97410 004200 0401 GUIU ERMO MILLDONADO; 4837 8 150Th ST; TUKWILA, WA 98188 004200 0405 JAMES PHAM;17855 S CENTER PKWY; TUKWILA, WA 98188 7861600029 RICHARD H BOTHAM; 16334 LINDEN AVE N; SEATTLE, WA 98133 788180 0031 RICHARD H BOTHAM ;18334 LINDEN AVE N; SEATTLE, WA 96133 7681600090 DANIELJ ROCHON; 5136 8151ST ST; SEATTLE, WA 98188 786160 0091 NETTIE CUNNINGHAM; 10114 2ND AVE S; SEATTLE, WA 98188 768180 0092 RUTH I HAYES; 18834 63RD AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 98188 766160 0093 ROBERT MCELREA; RR 1 BOX 381; HARRISON, AR 72601 7861600004 DANIEL J ROCHON; 6138 S 161ST ST; SEATTLE, WA 98168 7881800120 DANIEL J ROCHON; 5136 S 151ST ST; SEATTLE, WA 95188 7861800120 DANIEL J ROCHON; 6138 S 151ST 8T; SEATTLE, WA 98188 786160 0121 STEVE & MICHELLE OAKSMTTH; 8815 38TH AVE NW; SEATTLE, WA 98117 788180 0183 CARL R HAGLUND; 1111 E MADISON ST0131; SEATTLE, WA 98122 766160 0185 CARL R HAGLUND; 1111 E MADISON ST4I131; SEATTLE, WA 88122 766160 0210 ARNOLD E SCHERLER II; 6436 S 160TH 8T; SEATTLE, WA 98188 788180 0212 ALHADEFF PROPERTIES LIMITED PA ; ; 7661000240 ERIC E & JENNIFER L HEROERT; 14720 MACADAM RD S; TUKWILA, WA 98168 766160 0242 DON WATKINS; PO BOX 32; KUNA, ID 83834 7861800245 FRED & MARILOU FERRER; PO BOX 89345; SEATTLE„ WA 98168 799980 0030 WILLIAM A LOONEY; PO BOX 88090; SEATTLE, WA 98168 799080 0031 WILLIAM A 8 TRUDY SCHAEFER LOONEY; 4110 S 262ND PL; KENT, WA 98032 7990600185 CAL W CANTONWINE; 13733 451H AVE 8; SEATTLE, WA 98168 709980 0195 RICHARD H BOTHAM; 10334 LINDEN AVE N; SEATTLE, WA 98133 799960 0205 WILLIAM A LOCREY; PO BOX 66098; SEATTLE, WA 98188 873300 0005 ALHADEFF PROPERTIES UNITED PA ; ;, 873300 0041 ARNOLD E SCHERLER II; 5436 8150TH ST; SEATTLE, WA 98188 0040000640 RESIDENT; 1482951ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA98168 0040000645 RESIDENT; 14835 61ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 98168 004000 0655 RESIDENT; 14839 51ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 96188 004000 0660 RESIDENT; 1464161STAVE 8; TUKWILA WA 98188 004200 0170 RESIDENT; 1485951ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA08158 004200 0170 RESIDENT; 14859 51ST AVE 13; TUKWILA WA 98168 004200 0304 RESIDENT; 4815 8160TH ST; TUKWILA WA 98188 004200 0400 RESIDENT; 15005 61ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 98188 0042000405 RESIDENT; 15099 51ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 98188 7881800029 RESIDENT; 1470261ST AVE 8;TUKWILAWA08188 785180 0092 RESIDENT; 1494051ST AVE S;TUKWILAWA98185 788160 0093 RESIDENT; 14934 616T AVE S; TUKWILA WA 98188 788160 0210 RESIDENT; 14906 MACADAM RD S; TUKWILA WA 98168 790980 0031 RESIDENT ; 14517 63RD AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 98188 7999800185 RESIDENT; 14454 61ST AVE 8; TUKWILA WA 08168 873300 0041 RESIDENT; 14920 MACADAM RD 8; TUKWILA WA98188 SURROUNDING ZONING TO 1000 FT LDR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 0 OFFICE RCC RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL CENTER LAND USE SF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MF MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL VAC VACANT PLOTTED: 00112E07.d•d RNIX 04/18/01 09:28 SCALE: r • 200' DATE: Apr O6. 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED; APPROVED: ACAD DWO.: 001I2EO6,drp VIEW: • DJ % RE F : LIF: FLD OK: PO /: POOP: 111 I Il111 111 II 1 111 Ijl ;S I 1 }Ii ) I II III III 111 III 111 II 111 l I I 1I 1 I � ,1�I� I I� �. I "II�I IN -1... I �I.. � I I I I B I � � 1 61 • h . IIII „1„,0,IIIIIllI 1111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIp INIIIIIIIIIIIli1IIII 9.9A0 6+'•a •Aaq� • m : d mss-• 1 M4A• iAKO DUB Iola/ A' OPUS NW, L.L.C. LANDUSE IDENTIFICATION 81 ADJACENT OWNERSHIPS • .. OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILLA WASHINGTON JOB NO. 00112 SHEET • • • • • . • • .1.-1",`,-.r • • • • •, . .• ... • •. • . . ;c4,•.; • ••• • . h • .. • 1 t Tr - •,• • • • r• I t• • • . . • • . • • .„. • •. "•• • • .. , • • • ••• Z. A . • • • • . •■.• .••• • •; • '11 46 • • • : •.• I i • • ; • • i •p4o.t‘ • • • • • • • • • • • • . . 110_ , ....• C.. • • • • • . • Ave :F‘TILt‘.1tok. • - . • - . • •, • " • rr, • :. ' ' . " . Z.. •••.--....O • • . . I • • • • • • • • • .." , . • • . • • • • . . . . , • • . . . , . . . . . . . . • „ • . . ,,„ . • , . . • • • • • " • • • '.,•• • • • • . . . .." • • : • • . • • • • • • . : • 4 :t•e. g. :;t7") S.:: • .... . ... , • ' l' k• ` 4.4' •.• • `P•1'.4:4314'. . I .. ' ', • • . • 7 %. . ... .V'' .. :Z .. ...15tQ .., ......-:-..; ' — - ' • - ..-: -* !;!,:; ,75 , 1..t :,..),.. 1;; . - -...... •, . ,' - .'i- ..':''' .. .. . • ..... „. . . . . 1 • • , • • • . • t . *.• ; ••• ; - • . • • • • • • • • • • • • , • •. • • • • •• • • • • • ,•‘• • • • . • • • .• • • •• • .• • • • • •• ' • • • • • • • • • • • „ • • • • • • . •••• • . • . . • • • • • •—" • • • • • •- • ...1 t • • • , • • • • . . . • , t‘. •••• . . • . • •.. tkIc,11 • _ , .1 • ••••••440,--:1. 0i3O4 Pe‘tAc ,T114.0C - ruLtAilic t , to A sc.et.: ver6. i • • • . • . . . • ' • ,• . .. • • • • . • • • • . • • • •-• 100 • • • • • ..„ • . • • . • • • . ,• • .. .. . " • . . I Site Cross Sections Sheet 2 of 5 . . . • . . . , : • • • • . ' . . • - . . .. . . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . „ • . ,• ... ... .... . . .... .....• .. .............. ... .. . . . . . . „. . .. . .• _ 1 i 1 1 i.i 1 i 1 1 1 1.1 1 . j 1 1 1.1 1 ii 1 I 11 1 144.1.i.1 11 .14 1, Jul 11 1 1 1 11 11.111 1 11111 11 11111 1111111•1111/1.11111111111.111 1' I . nCh I I ' 11 , I - i " 21: - . 1 • 1 ' 1 :: - .1'' - ''' , '"• 1 \ - • - 11•'• . "'''! 1 " . "'417.17'' .1 ‘'"''' 1 I 51 1 1 1 61 If ' i t....1 : . 1 : ' " , : • • ' t . WESTCOTT ® : t: • I',''' ''' • -; : ' • ' . ' •:-. ' ' — ,' - • .- ; ' .- '' • ' . • ' " ' -: - 1 .. 72 " i . , . 1 ... \ YD. PK .. H. .011, 16 - 19 IL - 19 - 19 lt7 IE , IZ II. • NOI II11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111 • • w go s '7o _ • 1 111 Il . {ll 1( "I I(I lil Il':I . `I_,I,jl III III lil 111 i II Lil Ill lil III I I ,,,$ 11 i ^ 2I , I l I ll I IC , '3` I ,:. 1 7 '41; , _5 I 51 I I lil I lil 61 Inch , 1 STCOTT Since 1872 y . . t I. E 1. Z1t. H. ... O V: . .I6 I9 IZ I9 . I9 . It IE IZ I l • w3I II Inlilnl Ililllln Ililllinlllliillnl Inllnn nlllnll Illllllll ulllilll nnllnl unllul nllli p i;iIj i Illllnn Ii I i nlilnll — S•N1t. • 14r-, `' 3D` Ac'k. I• ID' I Site Cross Sections Sheet 3 of 5 • .. _.. - .. .._..,. ,.__ •. Roo ;: Lvi:l, ._ .... ._...... -. • ; .. .. ..... « . .. ..... . . • rr�. �ino�. • • • • ; • '. .. . ti• • . .. • • • • ' ,. �7 - f3i.r ir,r,'4ti vi.S fRfi'' ial,+} . ��.: �t v ._ .. : jp r; `�'- ti^' F. • • • c • . 1 30 %l 0. 70 ... f.e.'Cai<■ir :w*A\S • . • : • • • • • _ i : :,.i.I.1I!- Ii11.r7(i r . `111I Il`)- 1`1. 2t 11`.,(1.114 I`�s)�!;� 1 '!..! i ' Inch 1116 LSTCOTT S1nce:87a'• i _ +ardaa +w = >r ►Ii 1.: IIIIII�)�I�li►�; +i 1I��1) .: .x ., - , .r/1-1 5 6 • 9Il . Iii Cll. Z11 111 011 , 16 18 IL • . . I9 19: I • I! I I i6 1 1il WO) 1i iililiili Iii,I1iu nnlnii nnl11l1 1Inlnn n11lnil roll)) niiliin nuII!I nnInn!InlI!I iIIIII1ll II inilnii nilnii :_._,.,... r .......... •. ........ • • • ; ._..... I , :..�.... . 1b,-k t•■ l S C tN\ ira,L •S l;�,�t 0 w C - .2 Stake.. ; �ln:�� 1'� ; 30 • i • ... :. ..... ._.•_.. • . - .- . :���' • I Site Cross Sections Sheet 4 of 5 • • : • Jo .: • tl. uli►i►I►i iliiii11111 1111111 iii '1111111iiil►iiil jifilini li ili►iilni (iii► I 1 Z 6 .:W3 �► ► Iii ►► I►�►1����1►� ► ►1► ►► ►I►►► ► I► l►�. „I►i►►� ►i�►►� ►il►►► ►I. 4 L 9" 0 9 0' 0 0" 0 0 0 9" 99 0 0" 0' 0 9 0 0 0' 0 9 •• 9 o. l a 3 0. o. O 4 9 '..` 9 ,o' ,••••,• *.,.. 0, " 9 •' 0 0 0 9 9. 0 ' * 0 0 • 0 " * "0000'0 " 0 0000000 0 0 ..,' 0 0 ‘ 1 , :, 00 **" * 0 0 0 0 * ••3 0 0 ' 0 ,O .., . 09.. . - , 9 4' 4' • N ., ...., ..;} 0 .... Cr ••,` t 9 9 9• -, ... i • 0' h r Ze • ..,28. :,3 ao 3,4 ' 190 . ■. 9 91. • • • 4 o 9 9 0' .0 • 9 5 .70' 9 9 .C9 0 .0.0.0 10 IF ..." 2 0 . ..0 .. .% ..J..,P .,4 • ., 9 9 9 ,9 .,4 .,9 9 9 9 9 .:. 0 9 9 9 9 . 9 / 9 9 9 9 9 9. 9. 0 9 9 9 9 9 9/ 9 o / 9 9 9 3:r c Zi 079 V 9 ° " .. 9 0 9" 9 9 0 9 0' 9^ 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0' 0 9 9 0 o. . ,...,.. .......... ''' • 4 .. 1121§C o O 9 , ■. 3 ., . :.. 0' . :0' 0 . ., I . ... . •■9 . ., ., . .. . •, ... ' 0 0 0 0 9 9/ 0 0 9/ 0 9 . 0 19 •, 1 ll' ., .. 9 9 9 0' , 19 -, .., t* L 17 I . , i:' 4' 0' 1 P 4 3 , I •1,4'4'4'.0%4•4` 9 .... . 0' • ,^ 4 • 0 s 4' 1 ., 4' 4' . 1 , 1 0 ', t 4 , ) , .1 414 s 9 5 . 9> 4 ' 4 ' ..,' 9 • 4' 1 * •P 9 0 ' 0 1 , 9 9 0 999 9 • 0000000019. ze ti t3e I is% 'ss vA q s.s ii5 '31 I. t:I. to ::::..,::„, N 3 ' O 0 0 0 0 • _a9 9 i:.T6"t;IV: 0 9 0 0 9 9. 4, 0 / 1 0 0 0 9 1 61101. `3 , 1% a , b ... 4....., 4. 4. q; ct.....;,, ,.)..,,r,9 1 ,.. V * 9 9 9 , 9 :. .9 ..,9 9. o 0 ," 0 . 9 5999 . 39993999 9 9 9 9 0 4/ 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 9 9 9; . 39 0 9 9 : 4 : : :: I 3 i . i 9 : : : 9 $. .. ' 0' ' •1 4 . 7 '0' .,' •P . 1' . t' , .0 ' 0 .4? ' . P P 6 6' 4 1 4 e 1 4 ' 0' 3 t I, el 1. 00' 9 3 .5 1 $ 0' 9 0' . S 4' is •i tt ts o t eb. 0 ., 4' 4' •, .... ., 3 39 .0' 0' ... ..,.."•o • 19-, 5 190.0., 393919.1. . ‘ 393939 39 9 9 39399 9 t. 9 394V134 ,9 3939 9: 9 9 9 / 5 ,31 01 . 9 5 6, 5.,:: 9 % 4,5, > 3 ,,,,,; : o ,...,0. • 4' •0' •... •0' . 5 9 ., ., 9 . t. 9 9 t.• .. ... . ., 13v$: .0' , 0749 99•39 9 97 ., i,, 97 9 0 9 0 0 T 'PVT. .P 0000 9 9 9 99 9 39 9„ 99000 • 99 9: 09 0 01 09009 9 142 9 9 9 9 1,1 0000 4 0 0 0 0 0 9 99 • 14• 9 09 0 9' t y 3 • 1 • 3 3r 393939393999993939 1'2 1 1 ',.."•0',"" IP 39 . 393939393939 " , 3' 0' 5 9 Xref G:\ CURRENT \Opue Northweet\ DrawInge \Tukwila Office 5-405 \PREUM 24X36.de9 PROJECT DATA ZONING: OFFICE (0) BUILDING AREA (SO. FT.): LEVEL ONE • LEVEL TWO LEVEL THREE TOTAL 4 69,920 COMMON AREA (CORRIDORS, RESTROOMS, ETC.) 0 15% USABLE FLOOR AREA .4 .4 23,040 4. 23,440 23,440 (10,486) 59,432 PARKING REQUIRED: 59,432 0 31000 178 PARKING PROVIDED: STANDARD COMPACT ACCESSIBLE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT: 149 29 8 • 184 51st AVENUE SOUTH PAR1IAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 0 15 30' 60' 90' • . NORTH PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN MT, CF 1 Preliminary Lighting Plan shootior: Z < 0 II ci) 51st AVE SOUTH PRIMARY STATE i-IIGIAWAY NO. It (S.R. ' I II W 1 1 11 I I 1 11 11.1. 1 I 1 51 1 I 1 61 2 Inch 1,16 • Kr,rrr3 • since t • •••'. • • WESTCarls° •• • • • • - • - • . . • • • i LI- i t 1 1 1 Fa 04.0 2L0' ® `Fa l2.J • ACt[ 11 A.f TO VCEAULT P0 RT YP.1 �.' I 4. • AM.. . . P 7 mt. OR iN 1 D) PROJECT` AREA'A . 4.0 ROOF DRAIN LOADER (TYP.) G TO DET. VAULT• • TRENCH DRAIN (TYPA BOTH.LOADING BAYS • ELEV • 50.0 IE i'',OUT TO DET VAULT • 85.5 r Mkt MINIM IjIF3115 inns IMP -- .4.4.41 , al .‘ .41, c/oe CR LOW POINT RIM A MS .0 • pp C7. RIM•10S7 Fa w,o TP•S a ,r ol/rOAVr' o. . F PO /OS. , ax frrr.! a I/O. • •2S' BUFFER WETLAND A 'LOCK BLOCK (T1P.) . RETAINING WALL. 'SYSTEM OR EOUAL • ' IE 16" [D ARMOR OUTFALL WITH • RIP -RAP ILL x 1 W •.L THICK BYPASS STRUCTURE • CBI TYPF IL RIM • 53.0 12 SD CURB RAMP DED CATION F -W0.Y Terra . Associates, In Geotechnlcal Consultants FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENT FACE NEW VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER 14 EAST OF NOTE:. • • • • . THIS SITE PLAN;IS 'FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND IT SHOULD NOT B E USED FOR. CONSTRUCTION OR DESIGN PURPOSES. . 1 (S'R• 5.�.• CB. TYPE 11 CONNECT TO EXISTING* STORM REFERENCE: . • . SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY HUGH GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC :, DATED JULY 13, 2001. AT CENTER WITH ];1 SLOPEf 14:5' EACH SIDE) •ddo LF • APPROX. LOW • HYDROSEE0 FOR•3TASILITY OR. ' OTHER PLANTING PER PLANTING OR MITIGATION PLAN ' LEGEND: . 19 • ' APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION • 100 • LOW POINT. APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET WATER OUAUTY WATER SURFACE • 52.0 BOTTOMVAULT VARIES • teI REO'O:DETENTION VII, • 0 A • RE0' W TER OUALITY VOL. • 0:45 51st AVE SOUTH 200 Y1p *LI, ililn RIP- RAP�IL L • D W • V THICK • ABANDON EXIST. IS" S0 EAST OF CENTERLINE IMPROV CONSTRUCT NEW IS' SD TO NEW TYPE II CB IN FLOWLINE � ,�"F EMEN • is . /TALE 2SIIBLE i ' t + ., i 1 1i iliii iii ij..ilI jai .i.ii. L !(.!• -! :: �:i i iii l l!i ICI i11 I I Inch X1111) ( vt� ( 1 ' .. 1 2 c.. i., 3 , ::..,, . •.,..7L: "� ., r i . I I 5 I I ' 6 i WSTCOTT Since 1872 9 P £Il Z11. 14 OK 16 18 IL 19 19 117 I£ IZ 11. w�l 11 nn.Iii i 1!nl!n! nnlnn!n!I!u1!n!I!n! 1�!11nn iii (i i ii ilnl! nnluu i i Ii i nnlnu n!111n!!�!11!1n uulun!!111u +1 • DuFFelt " BUFFER COMPENSATION . AREA PROPOSED CLEARING LIMIT (TYP.) • • W. POINT IM • 50.8 ..TOP OF'BANK. • • IS' BUFFER IS' ID OUTFALL. TO EXISTING DITCH. . PROPOSED CLEARING • ARMOR OUTFALL WITH ' LIMIT (TYP.1 • RIP -RAP IL L 111 • L, THICK TRANGITION TO EXISTING ROAD SECTION • • *LOCK BLCK RETAINING WALL • SYSTEM OR EOVAL BUFFER * COMPENSATION AREA • • WETLAND B • EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN OPUS PARK I- 511405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, Proj. No. 4800 ' . Date SEPT 2001 Figure - 2 .I • 35mm Drawing 2,7 31 1 Ap,r * 1 ... 4 ;kat& IP • 4114 44 •-••4 e ' —q r WPM • I 1 1b11 : •1 •To a _ .__ e t � M 1 .. I X7°2.16 y . • PC • L dr Q •. ^ w .94 _ A i Q T pa *VW/ / a • = /\ I_ N. ,L1� .. 11); Vie 1: 40, ~ I I .11 ryJ7 I • • 414 t •it•ar` 1 1 I I I I s , _,... ,�, • x y o 61.CL. I I 4..11 fs fN -T I. ",, t . o , 1 t L. /•a if, 14.1 ;&MA ../ .� + , F Y 1• t N N N T11 • KINGVCOUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS g ,,I Im• I Y$ Y 4 7116006. W e 10 4 Itf . 6 ± a y44 .4• o 4 s 1 • MM 1 .•. • 4 /MS °T7 ry1I • 146 TN e 1 • K /' 160TH • 64 64 O 16 i4 IT W1 r• I s1,T P111? 1 I Ol I 0 I 0 4, s- 1 A s 1 ENTIRE MAP CITY OF TUKWILA . SEA, 15 -23 -4 .EA. TILE 55? /2:7 f.-. • fr.i°par 11•r .. d°S 4. 0 4;IT1i•80 S1 � 1 R rllt f i f �Yn_awlr:A 1 • �°° - i 4 • • • I° fo t�T In • L 01115 A • s . tel >, a t)r 1 D. 4• fa A . 47•4811 /1000 41.. toP moo ra� r • f/ aftry n • A .4 1 0 ; �.. .04 •4 •4 � Ie 011•11•000 SE.!. 22 —23.4 T" r' 4•a .N w1 .a N4 1 /. t FJ at me vF . as �sloc►�is 3 or KC 1966 4' us. a••�•o !!0l— AID II N ±E L l°,.C.... .1. iisma l.. A,A 0 11 w .nI .r4 t III irI i I 1 I I i I liiq�J I I Iljlii ili lljliil i�iji iul jilgllgilqllq 111pIlUl z . •.. 4I Ie� 5 e I IIIIIIIIII„ IIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .N 00 144TH S Or .878 s. t 004000 TA. II -11 J j\jJ 415 .s r N-. - -1114 10 • SEA. TILE 557 1111.41 Ar o ;tent - t 140TH I .wr N 4011 sT 10 • s t 0• N S K SH 41 IS 00 .414 004200 1.3EO m awn K • - 116.11' ••4 H D� i .414 N .4N • 4 ' °.=, 22— •23- SCALE I ".- 100' L.O. 'y�er 1430 0,441 y p rirr.. rat ant • : rr•h•N.4 nu/2 so, 3,40, ata_1r .v NTI 40 atit t• .. ' 'see 11: . a 1 i°1 Mp . 1 .y if • /1, N. .N I y Is • 41113 • rW v, f1. 1 1.144 K a• Y '.l • • ,1 4 44 40 a• f ... w • ff� 4 w Z i6 N N :41 z s /:,f S? -— Z--C!S L5 Ric o 0. 1O0 0.3c E o.05' �IS�� w S •Z- . +QR.f!T LE EE•EOFfE��. I / � - �'''''' � '� q �,•. el•e�S' `- 1 •w Is'eurTE �'�" X1 IY AMID �,� `�'FII�.IIF7 l �#�����f� \\ ... q`�A.�3.7� e... . r aErsrT I► ri:3�a'�13...� t�t7Si --� — '�r_:cQ..,..��.,. • - •• A.��: N P1739 KCAS 2633.25 MEASURED 2634.60 - PLAY 25 100 50 130 SCAT F. P • 50' 15'ACCES EASEMENT VERTICAL: CITY OF TUKWILA BENCHMARK: INVERT OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE APPROXIMATELY 125' EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 0121 IN SO, 15IST STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY. RIM ELEVATION = 90.0 FEET NOTE: CHECKED TO PUBLISHED I.E. TO WEST OF 75.5 FEET, 0.1 FOOT. 3. ACCEPTED UNRECORDED SURVEY BY SCHROETER & ASSOC, FOR OVERALL BOUNDARY. GOLDSMITH HAS TRAVERSED FROM WEST QUARTER CORNER TO NORTHWEST SECTION CORNER AND CHECKED TO EXISTING CORNERS BY OTHERS WITH ACCEPTABLE RESULTS. 1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS DRAWING IS TO ASSIST OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. IN EVALUATING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES, 4. BOUNDARY CALCULATIONS: THE BEARING OF NORTH LINE OF THE SCHROETER SURVEY (SOUTH MARGIN S0. 146TH STREET) WAS HELD AS THE SAME BEARING AS THE SOUTH LINE OF PLAT OF STERLING ADDITION (COMMON LINE OF TRACTS 3 AND 4 OF SEATTLE LAND CO. 5 ACRE TRACTS). THE BALANCE OF THE INTERIOR EAST -WEST LOT LINES WERE PRORATED BETWEEN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LINE AND THE LINE COMMON TO TRACTS 7 AND 8 OF SAID PLAT (NORTH MARGIN OF SO, 151ST), THE OVERALL EAST BOUNDARY (WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY OF 1 -5) IS SHOWN PER SCHROETER SURVEY. UPON REVIEW OF THE %SDOT RIGHT -OF -WAY PLANS THIS LINE MAY CHANGE SLIGHTLY. THE NORTH -SOUTH LINE BETWEEN TAX LOT 0091 AND 0093 IS SUBJECT TO VARIOUS INTERPRETATIONS AS TO LOCATION, FURTHER RESEARCH AND EVALUATION WOULD BE REQUIRED IN THE EVENT THAT A DEFINITIVE LOCATION OF THIS INTERIOR LINE BECOMES CRITICAL. 5. EASEMENTS: TWO EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFFECT /ENCUMBER THE OVERALL PROPERTY AND BOTH AFFECT TAX LOT 0030. I) A.F. 6299225, SOUTH 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES 2) A.F. 8701270486, SOUTH 25 FEET AND EAST 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES THE BENEFITTING PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 0029 AND TAX LOT 0031, IF THESE PARCELS WERE MERGED INTO TAX LOT 0030, THE EASEMENT WOULD. BE EXTINGUISHED, WETLAND A AREA• ? SQ. FT. 7 ACRES WY ORDER # 2. DATUM I) 870145 HORIZONTAL: NAD 83/91 HELD THE COORDINATE FOR THE WEST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 -23 -4 PER KING COUNTY SURVEY SECTION CONTROL DATABASE. WEIL AAD SDDAVARY PER AAf0SER6 ASSOC N SITE CITY PExsAW lEL 6/I 6. EIGHT TITLE REPORTS WERE RECEIVED FROM TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY AND EVALUATED AS FOLLOWS: TAX LOT 0029 0031 0195 • MO L EA Sia TYPE #STREAM S --- - ,�.�� aw - �•--� ��!!— — 92 DATE OF REPORT 10/23/2000 .0 6 TYPE l/ STREAM 77 2) 870146 0030 10/23/2000 3) 870144 0061 10/23/2000 PROJECT AREA A 2ND COMMITMENT 12/12/2000 SUPPLEMENT #1 TO 2ND COMMITMENT COMMITMENT 1/8/2001 4) 870143 0091 10/23/2000 5) 870142 0093 10/23/2000 6) 870141 0092 10/23/2000 7) 870139 0090 10/23/2000 0094 0120 PROJECT AREA B 8) 870140 0121 10/23/2000 9) NO REPORT 0205 NO REPORT SUPPLEMENT #1 TO 2ND COMMITMENT COMMITMENT TO ORDER #870144 ELIMINATED A PREVIOUS ACCESS EASEMENT PER A.F. #5555888 7, WETLANDS, DITCHES, AND /OR STREAMS SHOWN HEREON WERE IDENTIFIED AND /OR DELINEATED BY A.J. BREDBERG AND ASSOCIATES IN DECEMBER 2000, AND JANUARY 2001 AND SURVEYED BY GOLDSMITH & ASSOCIATES IN THE SAME PERIOD. PRELIMINARY WETLAND AND /OR STREAM BUFFERS ARE SHOWN BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE WETLAND BIOLOGIST AND IS SUBJECT TO REVISION. 8. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON JANUARY 2001 AND IS CURRENT TO THAT DATE ONLY, 9, AS OF THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY A TREE INVENTORY IS UNDERWAY, THE CURRENT LIMIT OF THE COMPLETED TREE SURVEY IS SHOWN HEREON, 10, PROJECT AREA A AND PROJECT AREA B BOUNDARIES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AS THE PROJECT PROCEEDS TOWARD CONSTRUCTION, LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS: PRIMARY STATE HIGH "4 - �_--I l o a ' J J TOP 0I7CN/STRFAY�"'� -- , - � �, y 0 1 • i ° 5Ist AVE SOUTH PROJECT AREA A (PER TRANSNATION TITLE REPORT NOS. 870146 AND 870144) THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. I; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 150 FEET TO THE TRUE .I POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE OF 199.25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4;, THENCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; TOGETHER WITH TRACT 5 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS, 'AS PER,PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING'COUNTYI EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. I. (SRS) BY DEEDS ,RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5484213 AND 5528319, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5561902; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. PROJECT AREA B (PER TRANSNATION TITLE REPORT NOS. 870139 AND 870140) TRACT 7 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; - EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 694285, • FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO, I; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. j �yL il l!!! \ ,�+/ ■■ An. NAIPE6(KATED i., ti PRELIMINARY JUN 2 2 2001 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Assoc EAD OP PPE NOT LOCATED WETLAND M WETLAND P 7 WETLAND N 7 WETLAND R CHAIN Lt FENCE l: WET AREAS AS DEFINED BY BREDBERG b ASSOC. AND CITY PERSONNEL 6/19/01 LEGEND b FH o UTILITY POLE •. E WIRE , CD TELE MH e MAIL BOX • WATER METER +- SIGN D4 WATER VALVE O TYPE 11 CATCH BASIN O TYPE I CATCH BASIN O DRILL HOLE • TEST PIT (TERRA) • TEST HOLE (BREDBERG) WTI 5 RATER VALVES 11oi 1.0.9 AREA a 353 SQ. FT. OR 0.01 ACRES AREA a 1074 SQ. FT, OR 0.02 ACRES AREA a 871 SQ. FT. OR 0.02 ACRES AREA a 217 SQ. FT, OR 0.01 ACRES TOTAL WETLAND AREA PER BREDBERG 8 ASSOC. • ?? ACRES 8s8 Hugh G. Goldsmith It Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 PO Box 3585 TEL' (426) 482 - 1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 482 -7719 REV. NO, 3 4 DATE 2/6/01 2/7/01 2/7/01 3/20/0 6/21/01 DESCRIPTION REVISED T•NET ADDED SSMH INVERTS ADDED STORM CATCH BASIN INVERTS REVISED T•NET. ADDED PROJECT BOUNDARIES. ADDED ADDITIONAL WETLANDS 0 REVISED STREAM BUFFER MADE 9T LON DTB 030 DTB LDN CNECNED GCR OCR OCR OCR OCR 5EV.N0. GATE DESCRIPTION MADE IT CNECNED PLOTTEOI 0012x01013 1.011001 01 /01/01 011151 9CALE1 F • 50' DATE, Fob OE. 0001 DRANNI 070 01nONED0 12600111 APPROV101 OCR ADAC 001,1 0012201.4., V•.1 0.1 2011 1611 010 SKI PG 11 RIM 0011201 0012E01 1440 1.16 00161 OPUS N.W. L.L.C. KING COUNTY TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR OPUS N.W. L.L.C. WASHINGTON J06 No. 00112 SHEET 5., iI UIIpI11 $1 u l llnllllllu1 , 2 I'I'IVIIII111(y'roil lli )I gllD)rti111N1119I1NIIp11NINei.. n�imhn7n ulmi �ixdw i�n uLni�n ulln�indun �il ldun�n uhm�imhn l�ilR lNl l�iml uu�iudun �unlnn �nninu�nulliu l % / I;1 � \ \ d 0 . 0 .l 1 \ AKER'S 'INTER \ a plc ♦ \ vA —x.. ,Ilc9 !. \ / I 0 �e F' -v . -- T t .. ru • so .rs -r - sg � G PCL.\ UNDnk� r tRU sec o4` V. \ \,7 • I/ f. fiT \ `\ \\ t , eE - . \ \ • f j yr � � ��'�' ` . . \ c • \ \ `:J� ,, , e a e_. \� ' aNER :\ .; 4 \:Js � . \Id 14 G W\ ' • ° N FILER/ _r ,` 4 , . % . i ` ) \ E �C //. 1 • R 1A ' . n+i e - 5 C r t �pn� NP RR 1 . 5 6 . 91 1� t i o e `s �� \ \ • PS a � 2ssaso \ \ ... t. +.� I 4--" Ir i r . "magi •" -EO•i) 0 U �t #.6 Iy , . w sis(uNe' 0. GREEN !RIVER 9V • u wc.ksio') j , 10\ 1 180 0 le ,y Iss_c Ia 40 -- �yy,.� • S� mss 156TH STKS• iIw 1 enoµ aMilSU .Me •cafe••. a<. �y4 s 'a aje I - roe 11 • i 7! , e • LN.. HENRY MEAOERS D. NO 46 1 0 25 50 SCALE 4 4 \ 4 4 4 \ 4 -•■••1161.—Z—eMff 4\, I00 4 4 WETLAND A 4 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3565 TEL (425) 482-1080 Bellevue, WA 98009 FAX: (425) 462-7719 = 50' 4 150 go PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY t40. 1 (S.R. 5) °° 0 1 90 2 ( cc ... \ ■•1 1.— N. \ u) EX 8700911 DRAIN \ 100 . Th PROJECT SITE 51st AVE SOUTH ---- SI I CHECKED 06 EXISTING ACCESS ROAD DESIGNED: APPROVED: 011 SCALE: r • 50' DATE: Apr 17, 2001 DRAWN: RNIX ACAD DWG.: 00112205.dv EXISTING BLD6.(TYP) 1D1 STORM DRAIN REV. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION . MADE BY PLOTTED: 0011240549g M ONO 07/16/01 13:21 VIEW: ,DJ XREF: LSF: FLD BK: PG #: PSSF: -..1[111111 ci I 1 i I Id I I I 1 I 1 I I I y I Vi,11.1 j1.1171,.1211,1.1. 41 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I.1 I Inch I,I . ■,10 . , .f.- 3 . , NVESTCOTT' ' ..."'•''' .. . ,.. , ' • , , 914 tI. £11. Z11. H. 011. 16 18 IL 19 19 It IC IZ Vg0I D CITY OF TUKWILA, 4 10 4 4 4 4 4 -4— •-•- .-- --- -----; ...--- ._- __• 14-- .---- - ,-- ,.... , ...• \ ...-- ..._ ..-- ...... - ...• 4 ......,-. ,./ ...„ -• . ,...., ....- ..- ...• „....... ........--- , ,,,,....;/:./ ..,_-- ,_... ' 7 .../ .... 4 '. 4 4 4 4 \,.., 4 -... 4 --........„ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 VVETLAN15ET 4 — OPUS NW, L.L.C. 4 4 4 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS OPUS PARK 5/405 4 4 4 4 4 90 4 4'\ 4 \ • \ WASHINGTON 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 EXHIBIT 021 JOB NO: 00112 EX I :`DETEN1 ON'L:: WQ . - -, max, : �rw..- • 0 • 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 N I— a -I a. a u a 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 3565 TEL: (425) 462 -1090 Bellevue, WA 98009 PAL (425) 462 -7719 REV. NO, DATE DESCRIPTION Inch 1:1b 51st AVE SOUTH MADE BY CHECKED ACAD DWG.: 00112E07.dr PSSF: 1 1144 1 1 1 .1 1 11. 1 .1_1 111 ' 111 I11 I I 1 ( ( I ( I 1�1 1II ICI 111 III III 1�I 1p1 111 11 .I i • 2' � .. "3I ..:4�" z, 5I 6) W1STCOTT Since 15 - . - n. I L I I. L O I I IL i I9 IP I £ I Z I W u unliiii H niilini £ ii Z iii�l��fi �inliii� „„1, ii 6 niiliiii 8 nnlnii nnliiii 9 nnlini iiiiliiii iiulini ���il iniluii iin. l DEVELOPED CONDITIONS OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA i WASHINGTON JOB NO: 00112 EXHIBIT EX 2 •■ • •• ..... '• NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR _ THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Task 2: Resource Review The following is a summary of the resources and documents reviewed for this downstream analysis. Relevant maps from these reports have been included in the attached appendices as referred to below. • Sensitive Area Folios - Appendix A The Sensitive Area Map Folio for King County, Washington (December 1990) indicates potential sensitive areas within, adjacent, and downstream of the proposed site. Copies of these maps are included in the attached appendix. Wetlands: There are no wetlands upstream or downstream of the project site indicated on the Sensitive Area Folio Wetlands map. Streams and 100 -year Flood Plains: There are no streams identified on the project site. The nearest stream identified is ant open channel portion of Gilliam Creek adjacent to SR -518 west of 51 Avenue South upstream of where drainage from the OPUS Park 5/405 site enters the main channel of Gilliam Creek. No portion of the site is in a flood plain. The only 100 -year flood plain identified downstream of the project site is the Green River flood plain over 1.5 miles downstream of the project site. Erosion Hazard Areas: There are no erosion hazard areas identified near the project study area. Landslide Hazard Areas: No landslide hazard areas are located near the project study area. Seismic Hazard Areas: No seismic hazard areas are located near the project study area. Coal Mine Hazard Area: No coal mine hazard areas are located near the project study area. • Wetland Inventory The King County Wetlands Inventory, identifies no wetlands upstream or downstream of the project site. However, there are two wetlands not identified by the inventory that are located adjacent to the project site. These wetlands are referred to as Wetlands A and B. Wetland A is a Type 3 wetland and Wetland B is a Type 2 wetland 1.34 acres in size. Detailed information regarding these wetlands are given in the wetland report, City of Tukwila Wetland Delineation Report, prepared for OPUS NW LLC by B &A, Inc. Feb, 2000. • USDA SCS King County Soils Survey - Appendix B SCS mapping indicates that the proposed project site is underlain by Urban Soils. Urban soils are identified by the SCS as those soils where the natural soil layer has been modified by the addition of fill material several feet thick to accommodate large industrial r00112H.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 51 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 12 • Floodplain / Floodway (FEMA) Maps There are no floodplains identified on -site or adjacent to the project site. The nearest flood plain areas indicated on the FEMA map (FEMA Map Number 5303300978) are along the Green River. or housing projects. In the Green River Valley the fill ranges from 3 to 12 feet in thickness. To the west of the site, soils information is not indicated on the SCS King County Soils Map. For more detailed information refer to the project geotechnical report. Although there are no floodplains indicated along Gilliam Creek, areas of ponding south of the 1 -405 and east of the 1 -5 along portions of Gilliam Creek are identified (FEMA Map Number 5303300959). This is consistent with the findings of the adopted basin report entitled Gilliam Creek Basin, Description of Existing Conditions and Alternatives for Improvement, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Feb 2000. This basin report indicates this area is prone to frequent ponding in particular when the Green River is at a high stage. The basin report identifies improvement projects to address this problem. Projects are identified to improve the outlet of Gilliam Creek to the Green River. This project is identified as Project Dl. Project D1 proposes a pump station to lower Gilliam Creek flood levels. • Critical Drainage Area There are no critical drainage areas specified by the 1998 K.C.S.W.D.M. • Landslide Hazard Drainage Area Map The project site is not located in a landslide hazard drainage area. • Flow Control Applications Map The project is located in a Level 1 Flow Control Area. • Water Quality Application Map The project is located in a Basic Water Quality Treatment Area. • Adopted Basin Plans and Finalized Drainage Studies The project is located within the Gilliam Creek Sub -Basin of the Green River Drainage Basin which has the adopted basin report entitled Gilliam Creek Basin, Description of Existing Conditions and Alternatives for Improvement, Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc., Feb 2000. • Basin Reconnaissance Summary Reports The basin reconnaissance has been completed as part of the report referred to above. There are not specific problems or mitigative measures listed by this report impacted by the proposed OPUS Tukwila project. The report recommends only one project in the 1 -5 West Sub - basin, a detention pond identified as the proposed mitigation for problem D19. This project is to address inadequate detention in the sub - basin. Drainage to the proposed pond is from 51 Avenue S. 150 feet north of South 152n Street to South 154 Street. Drainage from the OPUS Tukwila project site is not impacted by this project. r001121!.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 5/405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 13 " • Topographic Information Topographic field survey data was collected by Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. for the plat site and adjacent areas (2001). • Aerial Mapping Aerial photos taken in 1996 and 2000 were examined for site conditions. Figure 5 shows this image. The image north of South 151s Street is the 1996 as taken by NIES Aerial Photography. The area south of South 151s Street including the 1 -5 / 1 -405 Interchange is a 2000 orthophoto obtained from WASH DOT. r0011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 51405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 14 uti�'.<•r+.,.�'sst:a.:. .uas.:.:�k< >—=.,� = ;,ass:,_- .., Task 3: Field Inspection A Level 1 inspection for the OPUS Park 5/405 project was conducted during the project topographic and wetland surveys (Winter 2000/2001) and again on April 16, 2001. The latter inspection was completed using the guidelines for a Level 1 inspection as given in Section 2.3.1.1 of the 1998 KCSWDM. On the inspection date the air temperature was approximately 65° F, with clear skies. Basin boundaries shown on Figure 3 were verified, along with an examination of on- site and off -site drainage conditions and systems. Ground cover, slopes, soil types, wetlands and other topographic features were also observed. At the time of inspection flowing water was observed in the downstream system and the drainage channels adjacent to the development area. Saturated soils with some standing water was observed in the wetlands down stream of the project site. A detailed description of the drainage system and observed problems are presented in Task 4 of this report. � �� .t�'.o_.= _s' +titiaxSdrre+...::: s aaw* ovuw. tl` uwnw:.+ nStia: r'.. Y wru�iT: iriwurs+ k <4M mtiiree3 1.0011211.812 OPUS Park 51405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Page 15 ,. Al Task 4: Drainage System Description and Problem Descriptions The following is a description of the drainage system both on -site and downstream of the OPUS Park 5/405 site. As described previously there is a drainage ditch (classified as a Type 3 stream) that bisects the site in an eastward direction and a ditch (Type 3 stream) adjacent to the south site boundary. The ditch that crosses the site is clearly a manmade drainage channel and is .actively maintained. This ditch was constructed to convey drainage from basin areas upstream of the site across - the site directly to the l -5_ drainage ditch. This ditch starts where a 12" concrete storm pipe daylights on the east slope of 51 Avenue South. The ditch flows in a straight east/west direction across the site. This channel is 1 to 2 feet wide and 1 to 2 feet deep. The soils are clayey till with some sands and gravel present. The upper section of this ditch is steeper than the downstream section and has some signs of erosion. The lower portion of the ditch is flatter and more stable. This ditch discharges directly to the ditch running along the 1 -5. The ditch south of the site is also manmade and had has signs of been actively maintained. This ditch is classified as a Type 3 stream. This ditch is about 250 feet in length and starts where a 18" concrete storm pipe beneath 51s` Avenue South daylights. Approximately the first 75 feet of channel is steeper (10 %) and 2 to 3 feet deep and about 1 foot wide. This upper section is well vegetated and shows signs on incising. The remaining ditch length is about 1 to 1.5 feet wide and about 1 foot deep. This portion of the ditch has no vegetation adjacent to the channel and has recently been excavated. Flow in this ditch either enters a 6 inch PVC pipe that drains towards the 1 -5 ditch or continues towards Wetland B in an undefined channel. There is no direct outfall observed from this wetland to the 1 -5 ditch. Directly east of the site is a ditch along the 1 -5. This ditch is classified as a Type 3 stream. This ditch receives runoff directly from the project site and from Wetlands A and B although there is no observed direct connection of either wetland to the 1 -5 ditch. The 1 -5 ditch is straight, heavily vegetated and shows no signs of erosion. Where the ditch bottom is visible it is muddy and about 2 to 3 feet wide. The ditch flows southward towards South 151 Street for about 800 feet before the ditch flows enter a 24" CMP storm line. This storm line flows under a parking lot before daylighting 150 feet to the south into a heavily vegetated drainage ditch approximately 2 feet wide. This portion of the downstream system continues for about 150 to 200 feet to the south before entering a 36" concrete pipe. This system then continues for about 600 feet before connecting to a closed portion of the main stem of Gilliam Creek. Directly downstream of this connection point there is a small open channel portion of Gilliam Creek visible. Gilliam Creek briefly daylights through a 60" HDPE pipe before entering the drainage system beneath the 1 -5/1- 405 drainage system. This drainage system conveys drainage towards Southcenter Mall about 0.5 miles downstream and ultimately to the Green River as shown on Figure 3. Based upon the above observations and the resources examined, the proposed OPUS Park 5/405 development will not adversely effect the downstream drainage system or adjacent hydrologic features. r00112!l.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 5/405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 16 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems No drainage problems were identified in Task 4 of this report that may be created or exacerbated by the proposed OPUS Park 5/405 development. A stormwater control plan is proposed that will adequately control upstream drainage and safely control drainage generated from the proposed development site. It is proposed that upstream drainage will bypass the proposed stormwater control facility. One element of the control plan addressing upstream drainage is to replace a portion of the northern drainage ditch with a piped system discharging to a drainage ditch running in a north -south direction along the east property boundary. This ditch is proposed as mitigation for bypassing and removing the north drainage ditch. The upstream drainage control of the area flowing to the south drainage ditch will remain unchanged following development with the exception the proposed storm pipe reconfiguration and limited grading where the 51s Avenue South storm system discharges to the ditch. A detention vault is proposed to control on -site peak runoff rates at their existing rates. This facility will be designed using the KCRTS Level 1 flow control standard controlling both the 2 -year and the 10 -year release rates at the existing rate. It is proposed that the detention vault discharge to the 1 -5 ditch directly east of the project site. The developed site conditions are shown on the enclosed Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed stormwater control system along with the proposed site grading and building layout. The following are details of the hydrologic calculations associated with the analysis of the on -site drainage and the detention facility sizing. As described in the Task 1 section of this report the existing site conditions include several buildings, road area, and both grassed and treed areas. These site conditions existed prior to 1979 and are therefore, as per the 1998 KCSWDM, considered as existing site conditions for analysis of existing site hydrology. The land cover breakdown under the existing and the proposed developed conditions are given in Table 1 below. The developed site conditions used are based on the preliminary site plan as shown on Figure 2. The KCRTS hydrologic program was used for modeling the site hydrology. Refer to Appendix C for KCRTS output files based on the site conditions from Table 1. Using the KCRTS Level 1 standard the required detention volume (with a 10% factor of safety) is 0.55 ac. -ft. Table 2 below summarizes the existing and developed release rates. Water quality control is proposed to be through the use of a basic water quality vault. Details of this calculation are also given in Appendix C. The required water quality volume is 12,300 CF. Note: As per the 1998 KCSWDM existing grass area was modeled as till pasture. Regional rainfall factor = SeaTac 1.0 (KCSWDM Figure 3.2.2.A, page 3 -22) 10011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Table 1 Land Cover Conditions OPUS Park 51 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 17 z Z 111 6 0 0 tn W I � w LLQ I w z = �- w ~ 0 0- ❑ I— wW I 0 U.10 Z 1= H 0 z impervious (ac.) Till Grass (ac.) Till Pasture* (ac.) Till Forest (ac.) Total Area (ac.) Existing 0.54 0 1.97 0.49 3.0 Proposed 2.54 0.46 0 0 3.0 Task 5: Mitigation of Existing or Potential Problems No drainage problems were identified in Task 4 of this report that may be created or exacerbated by the proposed OPUS Park 5/405 development. A stormwater control plan is proposed that will adequately control upstream drainage and safely control drainage generated from the proposed development site. It is proposed that upstream drainage will bypass the proposed stormwater control facility. One element of the control plan addressing upstream drainage is to replace a portion of the northern drainage ditch with a piped system discharging to a drainage ditch running in a north -south direction along the east property boundary. This ditch is proposed as mitigation for bypassing and removing the north drainage ditch. The upstream drainage control of the area flowing to the south drainage ditch will remain unchanged following development with the exception the proposed storm pipe reconfiguration and limited grading where the 51s Avenue South storm system discharges to the ditch. A detention vault is proposed to control on -site peak runoff rates at their existing rates. This facility will be designed using the KCRTS Level 1 flow control standard controlling both the 2 -year and the 10 -year release rates at the existing rate. It is proposed that the detention vault discharge to the 1 -5 ditch directly east of the project site. The developed site conditions are shown on the enclosed Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2 shows the proposed stormwater control system along with the proposed site grading and building layout. The following are details of the hydrologic calculations associated with the analysis of the on -site drainage and the detention facility sizing. As described in the Task 1 section of this report the existing site conditions include several buildings, road area, and both grassed and treed areas. These site conditions existed prior to 1979 and are therefore, as per the 1998 KCSWDM, considered as existing site conditions for analysis of existing site hydrology. The land cover breakdown under the existing and the proposed developed conditions are given in Table 1 below. The developed site conditions used are based on the preliminary site plan as shown on Figure 2. The KCRTS hydrologic program was used for modeling the site hydrology. Refer to Appendix C for KCRTS output files based on the site conditions from Table 1. Using the KCRTS Level 1 standard the required detention volume (with a 10% factor of safety) is 0.55 ac. -ft. Table 2 below summarizes the existing and developed release rates. Water quality control is proposed to be through the use of a basic water quality vault. Details of this calculation are also given in Appendix C. The required water quality volume is 12,300 CF. Note: As per the 1998 KCSWDM existing grass area was modeled as till pasture. Regional rainfall factor = SeaTac 1.0 (KCSWDM Figure 3.2.2.A, page 3 -22) 10011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Table 1 Land Cover Conditions OPUS Park 51 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page 17 z Z 111 6 0 0 tn W I � w LLQ I w z = �- w ~ 0 0- ❑ I— wW I 0 U.10 Z 1= H 0 z Event Existing Rate (cfs) Developed Rate (cfs) 2 -year 0.175 0.168 10 -year 0.280 0.275 ' r0011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Table 2 Peak Flow Rate Comparison OPUS Park 5/405 - Level I Drainage Analysis Page 18 z _ �. 6 J U' UO U .W = W Q . = W z �. I- z • n o 0. W W' Z — O: Z: U N O ~� z L L�J y L i n 03 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. I - I N 0 1/2 6.11J SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) WETLANDS z • w J O 0 U) • W W J 1- U) U_ w 0 < C5 F_ W Z [– I– 0 Z J o W w 0 O P- 0 I– W w 0 LI- 0 O }- z r's . "•••.4 , N. • , ' • 11 7 , 1 (N I )) A , , •k V N 5.•rgtIVM4 - ,Iti.,s . •,..„ . . it ,:;%. ..•, ..,••••• .,1 , ,.• •• , 1 • I - - A,..la_,... 0 ••• , t1:7-As , - - ...,.. .- 7 ; A ,-.. 3 ".!t: .i'..;' . !;.,"i/ .''.' i. ' :,........ : . 1 : ...,.../..:-..: . •'''., ...: . • .. .„.. 1- • ..:). -.... •,.„,--.,....4......1., ' 2 , Ir . ..'t ‘,..0;;,. Ti.,-' )... ,-,...•\• • - ..'o•.,•• • •• , ; 4. = \ ,•: , -:-.-r- . • .1 r 1 „ . .".....„ -- i .....,..•:-,A....: .',/,... 5 . ...'..t 3 ' ; • ' -. i':' -,,.. . ,.... ...-!--,..t. , ' - • .'. '7....11VIZ 1 ...'"'f r ;'''''' :. :: : ::'-- !Fr '' • --=-=*-4,.. ,...-4.:7-0.i:..,: ..'• •.'i.... - • r ,...,....._ ......,..,„.„,.., . I ,) L'...- ' ,. .,: -1 ...,,7 .4.- ?- - . 1: „.,(Th . ' .. ' -'4 .4 "; : : ...i i i• • :: ': .i ".. , ,!:' 't • , ::: 1 • ._.,,:'.. • '-.•,,,- ,, 3.. . L; IL-.-4?..• c117,•i44;•;,.•:.ZW..i.:A:.!......."..... .. .... .....t.....T.I.L.i,••••At-,,Vi:•;•,;;;,Sr-,0`.:-',X.1`•, .1.7 • .:, , .., .''‘. 1 I t A 7 4-.• -..-•-•,.-.::::.(,.-: • ..v.... , i ..e .,..-. .t . t......i...-......1: : :,,-. , „:: ....,:,...- 4. • . -...,, ; : r, r...zt„,.., ..,,,_,:,,,,„::„. ,1,...:1,..: 21::. x ....c.:',, ,,A • - ••- ':,-. _ ..N. s, '," 1 ; ,... ... _ .., ::.\,..c. : 1 ; ,?, ,• ,, ,.. .... , , , ,..,.. ,..z: :;„ .:. .. • ' ■ f '" • •I :t: • ' '. f.: k, „- „ ,: • . ... .._ v;..■ ' ! 7 2.. ...!. ,t.„ ' . -:' IT ' ••• '''' 1. 4 - •-.:. . A :-. • .,....„, s ,..:.., ...- -' !'• .... . ,,,, ,,, :3r; rt Ma -- X. -,V-••••.:. ;•.' •-1, • :. - . ',., . ' '''''''‘\'' '''''' ;': '1''''''1' , .,..... .i::...). ...., •_, a...Z:420er. i .....%.: , , t, . •.. 1 ' • • ., - ...1 , k2.,LY, i•'...:',...:AL. s...'f.Y.4••••.;111-r;;---r-,7,.....--17.:•5'....:::::-. - ,... %. :, ,,,. .. - NX 4ti .i .. .-; •'... t .Wre:...\-.1:;13 Wai•i4';''.....t::17,i‘ :i . „; ' ..••• . •• ,. ' . , • . ..... . ::: . 77.1•„ eri..:- , ■': 1 I 1 ..V. ' • ' It LT.. -...--;... „ET/ 1 7irt, ,, , ... i • - .r ,./ ,5. ' '''' ,:.' • ,, . ' ' ''. 7, • i, • Ms. . \ - '. • '' :.:::''."--:-....- ' 1 .....,.---.-: ?.-..--,. Vi -,:•:. --- :): , P.. 11 l.,• -. • • : r/, .', ,. 1. - 3 . - .:. . -.-.. N ,,..:.;:.. z i " • . ...- , ,..A..:.. . - ,-r. • . .-.. .... .---... , ... . ••: 1 . - - ) r , - • .- 14_ .! :: filA:• ll -4' .1--- • ''.. k?.. --- ; - \ - -z..•:' ; i7 . !: - ....•: '. •-;.:;?. ' ' • . 11 — ''''' AN.,, , ■ r )',t •'.. 1 `....;______,j ■Nik,4%::......:., i' '''' '. ' ' , t- f .. 1. .-7'.:zit,, ?!rA,-• \ . ,.. • , t.---i fl • , • I . • .:• f • 4 • -, •:\ '. •V ••'• • •• %"..t.. • . •\ •:•. "..: 7 .. Z‘.•7-........'../ \ " t s .. ' \ -----"• ':•: j - 2 '' •., 1 ' • '..• ..'4.. . . l• , , , ,z 2- (777 - 17 . "1-7 -,-- .! t: t...- -1-='.': -.,..!",-,! ;.._ . '' e 1, f ' -; '.. , , - '• • , • .1;. I *., .,..\..• L '„ L \'..ii.:-. ,....4 1 ......,:. • ' ,•: 2 V . I ` '. I. - • . '''. 1 "R T. ":t .- ' Bk-,•,.;i- 1: „ ',Riv er i' ....---- • • at..-^. • • • It. st 0 1/2 611E1 SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) . 1... . • \ • r.:Ts • •• •• • .' !:( ; • • " • • I:a • t'4!' .... . •' , - 7 - - • • STREAMS/FLOOD HAZARD AREAS • a ral,.• LIMEMINI Min 1516 ' / 1 1111111111910" 661 i: N 0 1/2 SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) EROSION HAZARD AREAS ''' --- :_t.-.,:• . .;:-......... . " -- !..'1;;;,..-4•-•.— ) . ,, : :,.,,.; :,„:';... , -i • ,.. ; ■ • ......--,---...,., .:..4 •• ' .-...,• d •. \--,‘-',..,--:- '''' V ;\ ....\.,-,..\.....-.÷.. • n",.•%''i..4?..:. ,C • ii A /P r 0 1/2 SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING • - • • • • • • .i COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) • NA' : • • 25 ■••■•■••••••••■• LANDSLIDE HAZARD AREAS .• t.:14 • ... 1 .±•.\ • • 1:.•••1; • • . .... r 0 • 1/2 • . -•. • - . i .1: t,i, '".. • ',)•" • • ' '"' • '''' ..:' ..••••-:-::-. „••••••„/.,. f ),,, •/- ,. r . •!. • — ' • :, "n • 1 :1., ' 1' W ' • ... .,..;,k. '''.,1/ •.• ''• 1 ,.....,.. ....„? . - 'r''''., • •• ! • ,E?. :..,.. !, q.'t''' ;.„ .„•,:, „!„ - :. ' •■ , , • „,7.,.: ,.) ' J ,.1•••.:.. . -. 4( 4 ?_,•-• :--?:-:—I:- , ":"?',•.."'il : -. ) . , .. - .... . '1 • 5... ,' ' rt ....!,.,: .•:•'"A.,-•.':'-'• ., ' :•- • ,, • ' ,:'''t. ''' '''. - "1.: - :( .. . ' t .......... 4."! - • z• „.." , i,'' 3 :. • r•ii:',.: • ..•••(: v:r . .. 1,•: 'I..' '''-' 4 t - ''' .." 41 s. ......: , • --.. - -...- .. , ... ,.... v.,,,■■•••.:;•••••■• .. • . • • r . t • 4.. . • , ,-..--,,, ... .•-• ••• ‘,..... NNW 1111111111MONNUR va,4 LINIKOMMIS 111111111k 11111111111Warivan 111 4 „ SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) I • r . • \ ( , , •:"" _,... . ' '' c s- - 7) - -,A•1,• • .1 i .." , , 4 - i - I• ■.■.1/ . • ';..,... . ..2 i■ i ..,,.. -- ...;:::::"...- ...,.." _,..... 7::. 7."." ; ,..{V ■;.*- ., . -`.7... , \ -" t.k .1_ ,V• .." „r_.11. t I: : Vi ...., , 2/, 1 ., ..„..:...... •"' • i'.' - .1_,,, t; '• \ 4 •:-:',. -' -• ..„. • ,-.-...,....... • ) . • t;'•tee • / I 0 f• 25 NA'''et"- E • •• ;'ff ft SEISMIC HAZARD AREAS Ce: /0 • r • • \ r • 11111EIR SUM 111111111111ffiNam Ell MEM t 0 1/2 It!' SOURCE: SENSITIVE AREAS MAP FOLIO, KING COUNTY, WA (DEC. 1990) • c , rift \ '• ct •A 11 1' - : • •■••'''''. • • 1 25 ‘ 1111 .fn r j *' I k t t COAL MINE HAZARD AREAS NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 0 24,000 innsi__ „ Ur -URBAN LAND SOURCE: U.S.D.A., SOIL CONSERATION SERVICE, 1972 4 1/4 N SOILS MAP Z ~ W cc J 00 W a • W W = 0) L L W O u 2 d w Z I— O Z I- W • W U O - a W W 2 F- H LL — O .. Z W U— F- O ~ Z NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Existing Conditions Peak Flow Rates: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:aex.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.264 0.175 0.296 0.143 0.175 0.280 0.264 0.528 Computed Peaks - -- Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.994 0.876 1.21 1.02 1.21 1.06 1.49 1.94 Computed Peaks - -- Annual Flow Rate (CFS) 0.277 0.127 0.227 0.133 0.168 0.265 0.275 0.874 Computed Peak Flow Rates-- - Rank Time of Peak 2 8 5 7 6 4 3 1 Peaks 4 2/09/01 6 1/05/02 2 2/27/03 8 8/26/04 7 10/28/04 3 1/18/06 5 11/24/06 1 1/09/08 Developed Conditions Peak Flow Rates: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:adev.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac Peak Flow Rates-- - Rank Time of Peak Vault Discharge Peak Flow Rates: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:aout.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac Peak Flow Rates - - -. Rank Time of Peak r001121.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 15:00 16:00 7:00 2:00 16:00 16:00 3:00 6:00 7 2/09/01 2:00 8 1/05/02 16:00 3 12/08/02 18:00 6 8/26/04 2:00 4 10/28/04 16:00 5 1/18/06 16:00 2 10/26/06 0:00 1 1/09/08 6:00 2/09/01 19:00 1/06/02 5:00 3/06/03 21:00 8/24/04 0:00 1/05/05 10:00 1/18/06 22:00 11/24/06 7:00 1/09/08 9:00 Flow Frequency Analysis Peaks - (CFS) 0.528 0.296 0.280 0.264 0.264 0.175 0.175 0.143 0.451 - Rank Return Prob Period 1 100.00 0.990 2 25.00 0.960 3 10.00 0.900 4 5.00 0.800 5 3.00 0.667 6 2.00 0.500 7 1.30 0.231 8 1.10 0.091 50.00 0.980 Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 1.94 1 100.00 1.49 2 25.00 1.21 3 10.00 1.21 4 5.00 1.06 5 3.00 1.02 6 2.00 0.994 7 1.30 0.876 8 1.10 1.79 50.00 Flow Frequency Analysis 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0..500 0.231 0.091 0.980 - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.874 10.40 1 100.00 0.277 10.17 2 25.00 0.275 10.04 3 10.00 0.265 9.48 4 5.00 0.227 7.59 5 3.00 0.168 5.85 6 2.00 0.133 3.68 7 1.30 0.127 3.36 8 1.10 0.675 10.37 50.00 0.990 0.960 0.900 0.800 0.667 0.500 0.231 0.091 0.980 OPUS Park 51405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page C -1 Proposed Detention Vault: Retention /Detention Facility Type of Facility: Detention Vault Facility Length: 44.47 ft Facility Width: 44.47 ft Facility Area: 1978. sq. ft Effective Storage Depth: 10.25 ft Stage 0 Elevation: 0.00 ft Storage Volume: 20271. cu. ft Riser Head: 10.25 ft Riser Diameter: 12.00 inches Number of orifices: 2 Full Head Pipe Orifice # Height Diameter Discharge Diameter (ft) (in) (CFS) (in) 1 0.00 1.60 0.220 2 5.90 1.00 0.055 4.0 Top Notch Weir: None Outflow Rating Curve: None Stage Elevation Storage Discharge Percolation (ft) (ft) (cu. ft) (ac -ft) (cfs) (cfs) 0.00 0.00 0. 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.02 0.02 40. 0.001 0.009 0.00 0.03 0.03 59. 0.001 0.013 0.00 0.05 0.05 99. 0.002 0.016 0.00 0.07 0.07 138. 0.003 0.018 0.00 0.08 0.08 158. 0.004 0.020 0.00 0.10 0.10 198. 0.005 0.022 0.00 0.12 0.12 237. 0.005 0.024 0.00 0.13 0.13 257. 0.006 0.025 0.00 0.31 0.31 613. 0.014 0.038 0.00 0.48 0.48 949. 0.022 0.048 0.00 0.65 0.65 1286. 0.030 0.056 0.00 0.83 0.83 1642. 0.038 0.063 0.00 1.00 1.00 1978. 0.045 0.070 0.00 1.18 1.18 2334. 0.054 0.075 0.00 1.35 1.35 2670. 0.061 0.081 0.00 1.52 1.52 3006. 0.069 0.086 0.00 1.70 1.70 3362. 0.077 0.090 0.00 1.87 1.87 3698. 0.085 0.095 0.00 2.04 2.04 4034. 0.093 0.099 0.00 2.22 2.22 4390. 0.101 0.103 0.00 2.39 2.39 4727. 0.109 0.107 0.00 2.57 2.57 5083. 0.117 0.111 0.00 2.74 2.74 5419. 0.124 0.115 0.00 2.91 2.91 5755. 0.132 0.119 0.00 3.09 3.09 6111. 0.140 0.122 0.00 3.26 3.26 6447. 0.148 0.125 0.00 3.43 3.43 6783. 0.156 0.129 0.00 3.61 3.61 7139. 0.164 0.132 0.00 3.78. 3.78 7476. 0.172 0.135 0.00 3.96 3.96 7832. 0.180 0.138 0.00 4.13 4.13 8168. 0.188 0.141 0.00 4.30 4.30 8504. 0.195 0.144 0.00 4.48 4.48 8860. 0.203 0.147 0.00 4.65 4.65 9196. 0.211 0.150 0.00 4.82 4.82 9532. 0.219 0.153 0.00 5.00 5.00 9888. 0.227 0.155 0.00 5.17 5.17 10225. 0.235 0.158 0.00 5.35 5.35 10581. 0.243 0.161 0.00 5.52 5.52 10917. 0.251 0.163 0.00 ►0011211.812 OPUS Park 51405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Page C -2 5.69 5.69 11253. 0.258 0.166 0.00 5.87 5.87 11609. 0.267 0.168 0.00 5.90 5.90 11668. 0.268 0.169 0.00 5.91 5.91 11688. 0.268 0.169 0.00 5.92 5.92 11708. 0.269 0.170 0.00 5.93 5.93 11728. 0.269 0.171 0.00 5.94 5.94 11747. 0.270 0.173 0.00 5.95 5.95 11767. 0.270 0.175 0.00 5.96 5.96 11787. 0.271 0.176 0.00 5.97 5.97 11807. 0.271 0.177 0.00 5.98 5.98 11826. 0.271 0.178 0.00 5.99 5.99 11846. 0.272 0.178 0.00 6.17 6.17 12202. 0.280 0.186 0.00 6.34 6.34 12538. 0.288 0.193 0.00 6.51 6.51 12875. 0.296 0.199 0.00 6.69 6.69 13231. 0.304 0.204 0.00 6.86 6.86 13567. 0.311 0.209 0.00 7.04 7.04 13923. 0.320 0.213 0.00 7.21 7.21 14259. 0.327 0.217 0.00 7.38 7.38 14595. 0.335 0.222 0.00 7.56 7.56 14951. 0.343 0.226 0.00 7.73 7.73 15287. 0.351 0.230 0.00 7.90 7.90 15624. 0.359 0.234 0.00 8.08 8.08 15980. 0.367 0.237 0.00 8.25 8.25 16316. 0.375 0.241 0.00 8.43 8.43 16672. 0.383 0.245 0.00 8.60 8.60 17008. 0.390 0.248 0.00 8.77 8.77 17344. 0.398 0.252 0.00 8.95 8.95 17700. 0.406 0.255 0.00 9.12 9.12 18036. 0.414 0.258 0.00 9.29 9.29 18373. 0.422 0.262 0.00 9.47 9.47 18729. 0.430 0.265 0.00 9.64 9.64 19065. 0.438 0.268 0.00 9.82 9.82 19421. 0.446 0.271 0.00 9.99 9.99 19757. 0.454 0.274 0.00 10.16 10.16 20093. 0.461 0.277 0.00 10.25 10.25 20271. 0.465 0.279 0.00 10.35 10.35 20469. 0.470 0.589 0.00 10.45 10.45 20667. 0.474 1.150 0.00 10.55 10.55 20864. 0.479 1.880 0.00 10.65 10.65 21062. 0.484 2.680 0.00 10.75 10.75 21260. 0.488 2.960 0.00 10.85 10.85 21458. 0.493 3.220 0.00 10.95 10.95 21655. 0.497 3.450 0.00 11.05 11.05 .21853. 0.502 3.680 0.00 11.15 11.15 22051. 0.506 3.880 0.00 11.25 11.25 22249. 0.511 4.080 0.00 11.35 11.35 22447. 0.515 4.260 0.00 11.45 11.45 22644. 0.520 4.440 0.00 11.55 11.55 22842. 0.524 4.610 0.00 11.65 11.65 23040. 0.529 4.780 0.00 11.75 11.75 23238. 0.533 4.940 0.00 11.85 11.85 23435. 0.538 5.090 0.00 11.95 11.95 23633. 0.543 5.240 0.00 12.05 12.05 23831. 0.547 5.380 0.00 x0011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. OPUS Park 5/405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page C -3 Hyd Inflow Outflow Peak Calc Stage Elev 0.87 10.40 10.40 0.28 10.17 10.17 0.27 10.04 10.04 0.27 9.48 9.48 0.23 7.59 7.59 0.17 5.85 5.85 0.13 3.68 3.68 0.13 3.36 3.36 Target 1 1.30 * * * * * ** 2 0.66 * * * * * ** 3 0.93 0.28 4 0.70 * * * * * ** 5 0.79 * * * * * ** 6 0.76 0.17 7 0.64 * * * * * ** 8 0.56 * * * * * ** Route Time Series through Facility Inflow Time Series File:adev.tsf Outflow Time Series File:AOUT Inflow /Outflow Analysis Peak Inflow Discharge: Peak Outflow Discharge: Peak Reservoir Stage: Peak Reservoir Elev: Peak Reservoir Storage: Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:aout.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 0.277 0.127 0.227 0.133 0.168 0.265 0.275 0.874 Computed Peaks r0011211.812 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. 2 2/09/01 19:00 8 1/06/02 5:00 5 3/06/03 21:00 7 8/24/04 0:00 6 1/05/05 10:00 4 1/18/06 22:00 3 11/24/06 7:00 1 1/09/08 9:00 Storage (Cu -Ft) (Ac -Ft) 20569. 0.472 20106. 0.462 19858. 0.456 18756. 0.431 15017. 0.345 11564. 0.265 7279. 0.167 6642. 0.152 1.30 CFS at 6:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 0.874 CFS at 9:00 on Jan 9 in Year 8 10.40 Ft 10.40 Ft 20569. Cu -Ft 0.472 Ac -Ft Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) (ft) Period 0.874 10.40 1 100.00 0.990 0.277 10.17 2 25.00 0.960 0.275 10.04 3 10.00 0.900 0.265 9.48 4 5.00 0.800 0.227 7.59 5 3.00 0.667 0.168 5.85 6 2.00 0.500 0.133 3.68 7 1.30 0.231 0.127 3.36 8 1.10 0.091 0.675 10.37 50.00 0.980 OPUS Park 51405 - Level 1 Drainage Analysis Page C -4 Water Quality Calculations: Basic Wetpond V = 3.0 VT = 1 2(0.9 A i + 0.25A, 9 ) R = 0.47 in. (KCSWDM Figure 6.4.1.A, page 6 -69) A, = 2.54 ac. A = 0.46 ac. V = 4,100 C.F. Vb = 3 (4,100) = 12,300 C.F. r001121!.812 OPUS Park 51405 - Level I Drainage Analysis Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Page C -5 January 30, 2002 Mr. Martin Page Shannon and Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34 Street, Suite 100 PO Box 300303 Seattle, WA 98103 Project: E01- 018/L01 -051 Opus Park 5/405 51 Avenue South and South 151 Street Tukwila, WA King County Assessor Maps: NW 23 -24 -4, SW 23 -24 -4, NW 22 -23 -4, SE 22 -23 -4 Subject: Scope of Work for Independent Review of Geotechnical Report by Terra Associates, Inc. dated September 21, 2001, November 9, 2001. . Dear Mr. Page: city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Public Works James E Morrow, P.E., Director Please use the following scope to provide a quote for an independent review of the above report. Review the report to determine if the report meets the criteria in TMC 18.45 and the City's Geotechnical Report Guidelines and to determine if the information in the report is adequate and appropriate. The estimate should include a first review of the report and a review of any response to your comments. When providing the estimate, please be aware that the neighbors on all sides have expressed concern that the project will negatively affect their property drainage and the City would like comment on that concern. Projects /L01 -019 review work scope w....,...,. u..rwr > wuw . V: .. = �+++ .� .._ � ... «. --.+.♦ �..�eb.tnan' 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -433 -0179 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 z _ I- 11- 6 _J U 00 CD CI J H N LL w I d =w H = z � � z ►- w uj U 0 O F- wW I- ll. ..z w 0 '' z '4 Mr. Martin Page Page 2 January 30, 2002 In addition, please give a preliminary assessment of the MSE walls that the applicant proposes to install instead of concrete retaining walls. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206 - 433 -0179. Thank you, L. Jill Mosqueda, P.E. Development Engineer City of Tukwila UM:Iw cc: File Minnie Dhaliwal Enclosures: TMC 18.45 Geotechnical Report Guidelines Geotechnical Report and Addendums Site Cross Sections E01 -018 SEPA checklist (P:I aurie /JIII /Opus) Projects /L01 -019 review work scope City of Tukwila NOTICE OF DECISION January 25, 2002 TO: Andy Taber, Opus NW LLC, Applicant King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record Comprehensive Plan Designation /Zoninq District: Office Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L01 -051 Applicant: Opus NW, LLC. Type of Permit Applied for: Design Review Project Description: Development of an approximately 3.3 acre site with a three -story 69,920 square feet office building. Location: 14910-51s Avenue South Associated Files: SEPA (E01 -018) Type 2 Special Permission- Director (L01 -072) SEPA determination: A determination of Non - Significance was issued on December 18, 2001. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • .:: f'e.- . „..,.� S".'!. ” r i`:". . " ,- :. `t. : i3Pei.w . =4,,t,...T.I. .0 +.x ia�Ct•.a:_;.,aa, 't.�J__. -a. • z ~ w CL D JU The City Board of Architectural Review has determined that the Design Review application for u) o construction of a 69,920 square feet office building does comply with applicable City code in i requirements and has approved that application, subject to the following conditions: 1 1. In the event any perimeter landscaping is removed as a result of any dispute w between the two parties involved with the underlying ingress /egress and utility 5 easement, applicant shall be responsible for providing perimeter landscaping in an a appropriate alternative location to meet the intent of Tukwila Municipal Code's = a landscaping requirements. Z 1 F 2. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan w I- and the landscape plan to reduce the total width of 37 feet wide drive aisle to g D incorporate additional interior parking lot landscaping between the two rows of D O . parking in the north parking lot along the east property line. o 3. The roof top equipment shall be painted the same color as the building to minimize i 0 "-- o z 4. Based on Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.050 Design Review Criteria #2e, sight v co distance analysis of the intersection of south driveway and 51 Avenue South shall 0 be reviewed by the City Engineer. If required by the City Engineer, applicant shall z provide additional studies and revise the driveway access to meet the adopted safety standards, prior to the issuance of the building permit. visibility from 1 -5. II. DECISION Additionally the applicant must note the following items: Notice of Decision, L01 -051 January 25, 2002 Page 2 of 4 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements related to perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. 2. A boundary line adjustment to consolidate the two lots must be recorded prior to issuance of building permit. 3. Since the subject site lies in the quarantine established by the Washington State Department of Agriculture in relation to longhorned beetle. Applicant shall meet all Department of Agriculture requirements. �.,: Suds.:} �G,, �" e:: fiil'. r�i+ i3; �5ti::�!'ii%.ti ?�'.LM[+t;'.'.eL' tin; Yviig}%l: tt+ rkrr+! iut r,,•arcN..'.�;�C,:�i.,,.e3�,3t. ...: ,a.,,:•:r ....... ............ Notice of Decision, L01 -051 January 25, 2002 Page 3 of 4 4. Applicant shall meet all Type 2 Special Permission approval conditions including providing a revised cost estimate for the mitigation work and a bond to guarantee the mitigation work. 1 z o: m 5. Applicant must obtain Hydraulic Project Approval from the Washington State 6 = Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. U o 6. A separate sign permit must be obtained for any proposed signage. U w 7. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant shall provide detailed structural review w o of the mechanically earth stabilized systems. LLQ 8. The project shall include street frontage improvements along 51s Avenue South; c a improvements to South 154` Street and 52 Avenue intersection; and payment of a w pro -rata shall be approved by Public Works, before the building permit is approved. z !- Frontal improvements on 51st Avenue South shall include right -of -way dedication, z o curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage, lighting, and paving based on the road classification w w and the traffic impact analysis. Traffic improvements include widening and a left turn n o pocket at South 154th Street and 52nd Avenue South. o o f III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS w w H- S2 The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 4 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal LL. O z Code §18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. One administrative appeal to the City Council of the Board of Architectural Review Decision is O permitted. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the City Council appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the City Council decision. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING In order to appeal the Board of Architectural Review decision on the Permit Application, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of this Decision, that is by February 15, 2002. The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code ch. 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials MUST include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. .t2%- 'tict7fr' :izwv y,.. ...,, z 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. 4. The Notice of Appeal shall identify (a) the specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; (b) the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and (c) the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. V. APPEAL HEARINGS PROCESS The City Council hearing regarding the appeal shall be conducted as a closed record hearing before the based on the testimony and documentary evidence presented at the open record hearing conducted by the Board of Architectural Review. The City Council decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the City Council decision on this application must file an appeal pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. If no appeal of the City Council decision is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the Decision on this permit will be final. VI. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permits are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal, who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3685 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila Notice of Decision, L01 -051 January 25, 2002 Page 4 of 4 J�. t..a: .q. q . �t - urw. "fi i'. �t t G 'l.lk. icy 7r f:t*, 4yT�� {,�,, .w'W:4 NI•i} :..r�..c.. ..,n �.'u('�'ti:.::.:... ...� .. rr :�✓.. .� ow..s i.V ".P°Liae,.:M',{ ��s.;�� �n�. .. _.. ""� {. k _ _. Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, /j'1 /Nn/ " D / Q s t- HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance i)10:1_____ Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice OF Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: Notice of Action 0 Person requesting mailing: Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit _ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 v ��' Other N 'Q D6 Z.,,, �,�/ { Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 25 day of in the year 20 02.-- P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: £ I s f y0,- a i)10:1_____ Project Number: �� -�S OF s Mailer's Signature: 0 Person requesting mailing: { Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 25 day of in the year 20 02.-- P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM City of Tukwila THURSDAY, January 24, 2002 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW - 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ATTENDANCE III. ADOPTION OF MINUTES - November 8, 2001 V. Election of Officers VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT VII. ADJOURN BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director CHAIRMAN, VERN MERYHEW, VICE CHAIRMAN, DAVID LIVERMORE, COMMISSIONERS, BILL ARTHUR, GEORGE MALINA, HENRY MARVIN, KIRSTINE WHISLER, AND MARGARET BRATCHER Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers IV. CASE NUMBER: L01 -051 (Design Review) APPLICANT: Opus NW, L.L.C. REQUEST: To construct a 69,920 square feet office building with 164 parking spaces on an approximately 3.3 acre site. LOCATION: 14910 -51 Ave South, Tukwila, WA 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 HEARING DATE: NOTIFICATION: FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: OWNER: REQUESTS: ASSOCIATED PERMITS: LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION: STAFF: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PREPARED JANUARY 16, 2002 January 24, 2002 On August 27, 2001, Notice of application was posted on site and mailed to surrounding property owners and occupants. Notice of Hearing was posted on site; mailed to surrounding property owners and occupants on January 10, 2002. It was published in the Seattle Times on January 11, 2002. L01 -051 Opus NW LLC Sheila Burns, Johann Pollinger Design Review approval of development of an approximately 3.3 acre site with a three -story 69,920 square feet office building. SEPA Type 2 Special Permission Development Permit 14910 -51 Avenue South Office (0) Minnie Dhaliwal Steven M. Mullet, Mayor SEPA DETERMINATION: Determination of Non-Significance issued on December 18, 2001. g+ r,: 3? ' y .c '.r :G yyi; ��:c b'r 4 E �n� .w 6 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 ATTACHMENTS: A. Drawings: Site Plan, Elevations, Site Section, Landscape Plans, Topography and Boundary Survey, Sensitive area and Tree Survey, Preliminary Drainage Plan. B. Colored Rendering C. Site cross sections prepared by Geo- technical Engineers - Terra Associates D. Letter from Terra Associates along with sketches and photos addressing the mechanically stabilized earth system. E. Applicant's responses to Design Review application. F. Comment letters dated September 6, 2001 and January 13, 2002, from Richard and Virginia Botham; letters dated September 6, 2001, and January 16, 2002, from attorneys representing Mr. & Ms. Botham, response letter from the City dated December 7, 2001 addressing the concerns raised by Mr. & Ms. Botham. G. SEPA determination and Staff report. H. Type 2 Special Permission — Notice of Decision and staff report. I. Color board (presented at hearing) 2 • VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION Project Description FINDINGS The proposed office building is a three -story 69,920 square feet building on an approximately 3.3 acre site. The building is proposed to be used for general office technology type business. The first floor will be used for light assembly, repair, or storage of electronic equipment and the upper floors will be used for office space. The light assembly /repair /storage of electronic equipment was proposed under the 'High Tech assembly' category of the zoning code. This application was determined complete prior to adoption of code amendments that deleted the 'High Tech assembly' use from the list of permitted uses in the Office zone. The proposal includes approximately 164 on -site parking stalls and two truck docks on north and south side of the building. The site is accessed by two driveways along 51 Avenue South. The building is proposed to be a concrete building with a total height of 51 feet from finished floor elevation (39 feet from average finished grade). Due to the proposed grade and fill the building will appear like a two story building on the west side (along 51 Avenue South) and all three stories shall be visible on the east side (along I -5). On the west side the second floor of the building shall be directly accessed from the proposed parking that will be at the street level. The project site contains two Type 3 watercourses that flow from the west and a Type 2 watercourse segment along the east side within the WSDOT I -5 right -of -way that eventually flows into Gilliam Creek. There are two offsite wetland areas with some buffer areas extending onto the site: Type 2 wetland with a 50 feet buffer on the south side and Type 3 offsite wetland with a 25 feet buffer on the north side. No work is proposed to be performed within the wetlands or their associated buffers. The northern watercourse that is a maintained drainage channel with low riparian/habitat function is proposed for piping under the parking lot. It will be re- routed between I -5 watercourse and eastern edge of the parking lot. A 40 -feet portion of the second watercourse is also proposed to be piped to achieve construction grades to build the south driveway access from 51 Avenue South. Type 2- Special Permission to pipe and reroute the watercourse was approved with conditions by the Director of Community Development on January 10, 2002. Fill material is proposed to be placed over most of the site area to achieve the construction grades. It is estimated to be approximately 20,000 cubic yards. The fill depth will range from a minimum of about 2 feet to the east to a maximum of about 12 feet to the west. A Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) system using geo -grid fabric mats is proposed to be used to stabilize the slope of the fill at the property lines. 3 .:.:'� t, �jf" �j ; 'Yw;.� o j��',�'.r's'•'fi':1:'�''es�iv A ,ni+��Y4'G' a' .....�•°,t'i Preliminary drainage indicates that on -site runoff will be cleaned and will flow into an underground detention vault below parking on the east side of the proposed building. The vault will discharge to an existing Type 2 watercourse along Interstate -5 that eventually flows into Gilliam Creek. Traffic mitigation measures were identified in the traffic impact analysis, and the project shall include street frontage improvements along 51 Avenue South; improvements to South 154t Street and 52 " Avenue intersection; and payment of a pro -rata contribution to the City's street improvement projects. The final roadway improvement design shall be approved by Public Works, before the building permit is approved. Frontal improvements on 51st Avenue South shall include 20 feet of right -of -way dedication, curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage, lighting, and paving based on the road classification and the traffic impact analysis. Traffic improvements include widening and a left turn pocket at South 154th Street and 52nd Avenue South. This project site lies within the quarantine that was established to help prevent the citrus longhorned beetle from becoming established in Washington by the State Department of Agriculture on November 27, 2001. The quarantine extends about ' /2 mile around the site where three citrus longhorned beetles were captured in August 2001 and entomologists found evidence that five beetles escaped. There are restrictions on removal of plants or parts of plants from this quarantine area in order to prohibit live beetles, larvae, eggs, trees or other plant material that may be infested by the beetle. Applicant shall comply with all State Department of Agriculture requirements and obtain all necessary State permits for disposal of removed trees or other vegetation material. Surrounding Land Uses The project site is located on two tax lots that are west of I -5 and east of 51St Avenue South. There are six houses currently located on the subject site that are proposed to be demolished. The properties on the west side of 51 Avenue South are zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) and properties to the north and south are zoned Office. However the predominant existing landuse in the general project area is residential. There are some office buildings further south from the subject site along Southcenter Boulevard. COMMENTS All comments received for the proposed project are included as attachment F. In response to the notice of application, written comments (dated September 7, 2001) were received from Richard and Virginia Botham. The comments included questions and concerns regarding retaining walls, storm drainage, parking and underlying easements. Comments dated September 6, 2001, were also received from attorneys representing Mr. & Ms. Botham. A response letter by the city dated December 7, 2001, addressing each of the concerns raised was sent to them. Additional comments (dated January 13, 2001, and January 16, 2001) related to the easement issue were received from Mr. & Ms. Botham and their attorneys. 4 Listed below is the response to the concerns raised in January 13, 2001 comment letter: 1. The easement in question is a private easement between two parties. The City's role in reviewing and approving this project is to ensure all Tukwila Municipal Code requirements are met. In previous correspondence to the applicant the city had asked the two parties to resolve the easement issue by either coming to an agreement on the use of the easement or change the underlying easement. In response, the applicant revised the site plan to not show parking in the easement area and realigned the east - west driveway with the underlying easement. However there is still controversy between the two parties on placement of landscaping within the easement area. This matter needs to be resolved between the two parties. In the event any perimeter landscaping is removed as a result of any dispute, applicant shall be responsible for providing perimeter landscaping in an appropriate alternative location to meet the intent of Tukwila Municipal Code's landscaping requirements. 2. The easement in question is a private easement between two parties and city does not have any code basis to require any additional "no parking" signage. 3. Detailed drainage review shall be evaluated at the time of building permit review. According to the City's Public Works Department, the parking lots will be graded (sloped) so that the surface water from the lots goes to the catch basins in the parking lots and then to the surface water control devices. No parking surfaces will be sloped toward the neighboring lots and no significant runoff from the parking lots will flow onto neighboring properties. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA This project is subject to Board of Architectural (BAR) design approval under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section 18.60.030. In the following discussion the Board of Architectural Review criterion is shown below in bold, followed by staff's comments. For the applicant's response to the criteria, see Attachment E. 18.60.050 General Review Criteria 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement; b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas; c. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to the site. 5 L�� �; � � j, � � �; �."'' s1 �.'< ' � :. ° c�{: {ii' «.�o'.}L',.�s.E°.. • ±r N'1F:"wi The proposed building is located in the center of the subject site with parking around the building and it is setback more than 75 feet from the east property line along 51 Avenue South. A colored concrete pedestrian path connects the main entrance of the building to the sidewalk along 51" Avenue South. Landscape islands are provided in order to moderate the visual impact of the large paved area. The project meets the TMC parking requirements as a total of 164 on -site parking spaces area provided. It is a three -story building and the top of the parapet is 39 feet from the average finished grade. The maximum height allowed in the Office zone is 35 feet or three- stories. The proposed building is classified as a three -story building per Uniform Building Code. 2. Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. a. Harmony on texture, lines and masses is encouraged; b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided; c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character; d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged; e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Due to the proposed grade and fill the building will appear like a two story building on the west side (along 51 Avenue South) and all three stories shall be visible on the east side (along I -5). On the west side the second floor of the building shall be directly accessed from the proposed parking that will be at the street level. The building shall appear to be two -story building from the adjoining residential areas. According to the Geo- technical report prepared by Terra Associates, fill material will be placed over most of the site area to achieve the construction grades. It is estimated to be approximately 20,000 cubic yards. The fill depth will range from a minimum of about 2 feet to the east to a maximum of about 12 feet to the west. Applicant shall follow all recommendations of the geo- technical engineer. A Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) system using geo -grid fabric mats is proposed to be used to stabilize the slope of the fill at the property lines. See attachment C and D for details. Applicant was requested to analyze other site development alternatives in order to reduce the amount of fill on the subject site such as increasing the slope from 51 Avenue into the west parking area and providing parking at the first floor level instead of the second floor. However, the applicant concluded that there was no other satisfactory design alternative and dropping the west parking area would prevent them from having a front door at parking level and would make the area between the building and 51 Avenue feel dark and canyon like. In light of that applicant was asked to further address any environmental impacts of the proposed fill on the subject site or adjoining properties. Applicant submitted a letter from their geo - technical engineer that was reviewed and approved by the City's Public Works 6 Department. Applicant's consultant concluded that placement of fill material on the subject site would have no affect on current groundwater seepage conditions of the subject site or on adjacent properties. There are two truck docks on the north and south side of the building. The site is accessed by two driveways along 51' Avenue South. There is pedestrian walkway along the w periphery of the proposed building leading up to two entrances on the east and west side. 6 JU Perimeter landscaping is provided along all property lines as required by Tukwila co o Municipal Code landscaping requirements. Detailed discussion of landscaping is included J below. cow w ° 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment. g a. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a w development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced; = a b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should Z promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance; 1, 0 c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen W w vistas and important axis, and provide shade; > 0 In locations where plants will be susceptible to inju,y by pedestrian or p motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken; e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in v paved areas is encouraged; w ~O Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, w Z should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combina- v i-- don; z g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used; h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Foundation landscaping is provided along the east and west facade to soften the impact of the proposed building. Landscape treatment also helps in highlighting the entrances of the building. Landscaping is provided along the pedestrian path that connects the sidewalk along 51s` Avenue South. Landscape islands are provided to soften the impact of paved areas. Wheel stops are provided where the parking stalls abut any landscaped area. A total of 37 feet wide drive aisle is provided along east property line. This large paved area could be reduced to a minimum of 24 feet and additional interior parking lot landscaping provided between the two rows of parking. 7 Garbage /recycling area will be screened by an enclosure that is consistent with the design of the building. Also, additional landscaping is proposed around the enclosure. The lighting plan was reviewed to ensure that there is no off -site glare. The west side of the site is the proposed location of the relocated watercourse and the mitigation planting that constitutes mostly native vegetation. Perimeter landscaping areas are shown on the landscape plan. However the plant material within the perimeter landscape areas must meet all code requirements of trees, shrubs and groundcover. The perimeter landscaping along the west property line must include trees at 30 feet on center. Also the perimeter landscaping along a portion of the north and east property lines must include trees. Perimeter landscaping along the south property line must include shrubs and ground cover. Additionally all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Trees planted in the required perimeter landscaping areas cannot be counted towards the replacement trees. Based on the review of the tree survey additional trees must be planted. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant will need to revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements. Also, all other landscape requirements listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. 4. Building Design. a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings; b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments; c. Building components such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure; d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent; e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view; Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design; g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. 8 V sir d+i t+tYftT =sii t.R`' A 5+4' i!a,?siVt4H7 f,,? er..si ' a' ,.,,�,. .. .._.. J+i.N..A "ti �M1IMd4gL' Applicant was asked to provide modulation along the east and west facade to break the monotony of the large facade. Modulation was incorporated in the revised elevations. The building is 39 feet high from the average finished grade. It is considered a three -story building per Uniform Building Code and thus meets the TMC height regulations. The first floor of the building is painted a different color to provide a base to the w structure. The coping element at the top of the parapet provides a cap to the structure. n 00 The sidewalk along 51 Avenue South and the main entrance of the building will be co o LLI connected by a colored concrete pedestrian path. w U) u_ HVAC equipment shall be screened by the parapet of the building. At this time applicant w o has not indicated the placement, size or color of the HVAC equipment. The equipment w g must be painted the same color as the building to minimize visibility from the higher elevation along I -5. = z � Originally retaining walls were proposed along the property lines. Since Tukwila F- O Municipal Code considers retaining walls over three feet in height as structures and they w w must meet structural setbacks, the project was revised to replace retaining walls with v o mechanically stabilized earth systems. See attachments D/E for details on these systems. p u) Aesthetically it is a better alternative than blank walls. Prior to issuance of building o w w permit, applicant shall provide detailed structural design of the mechanically stabilized v earth systems. 1.- p ..z S. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. H I O a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale; b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. As referenced earlier the enclosure around garbage /recycling area shall be consistent with the architectural design of the building. Bicycle parking is proposed along the north east corner of the building. CONCLUSIONS (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. The structure is located in the center of the subject site with parking around the building and is proportionate to the site area. It is a three -story building and meets all TMC height 9 aGti �''r�.tr. z (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. I ~ n: 11 O 0 En w= � LL w 0 2 Q cn = ▪ w z = 0 Foundation landscaping is provided along the east and west facade to soften the impact of the proposed building. Landscape islands are provided to soften the impact of paved v c;) areas. Garbage /recycling areas will be screened by an enclosure and additional 0 P- l andscaping. The west side of the site is the proposed location of the relocated . ❑ ui w watercourse and the mitigation planting that constitutes mostly native vegetation. I v "- z (3) and setback requirements. A colored concrete pedestrian path connects the main entrance of the building to the sidewalk along 51S`Avenue South. Landscape islands are provided in order to moderate the visual impact of the large paved area. Due to the proposed grade and fill the building will appear like a two story building on the west side (along 51S` Avenue South) and all three stories shall be visible on the east side (along I -5). On the west side the second floor of the building shall be directly accessed from the proposed parking that will be at the street level. The relationship of the structure and site to adjoining area is appropriate as the building shall appear to be two - story building from the adjoining residential areas. The two truck docks on the north and south side of the building are screened from the public street due to the proposed location. The pedestrian path from the sidewalk will highlight the main entrance. Landscaping and Site Treatment. Perimeter landscaping areas are shown on the landscape plan. However the plant material within the perimeter landscape areas must meet all code requirements of trees, shrubs and groundcover. The perimeter landscaping along the west property line must include trees at 30 feet on center. Also the perimeter landscaping along a portion of the north and east property lines must include trees as required per TMC 18.52.030. Perimeter landscaping along the south property line must include shrubs and ground cover. A total of 37 feet wide drive aisle is provided along east property line. This large paved area could be reduced to a minimum of 24 feet and additional interior parking lot landscaping provided between the two rows of parking. Prior to issuance of the building permit, the applicant will need to revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements related to perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. (4) Building Design. Modulation and foundation landscaping is provided along east and west facade to soften the monotony of the large facade. The building is considered a three -story building per Uniform Building Code and thus meets the TMC height regulations. 1 ;: . ..... :... " ^ ^'^ zz •yw Ui 0~ z (5) HVAC equipment shall be screened by the parapet of the proposed building. Additionally it should be painted the same color as the building to minimize the visual clutter on the roof from the higher elevation along I -5. Mechanically stabilized earth systems will stabilize the fill along property lines and will provide a better aesthetic treatment than retaining walls. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant will be required to provide detailed structural design of such system. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture shall be compatible with the design of the building. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval of the Design Review application with the following conditions: 1. In the event any perimeter landscaping is removed as a result of any dispute between the two parties involved with the underlying ingress /egress and utility easement, applicant shall be responsible for providing perimeter landscaping in an appropriate alternative location to meet the intent of Tukwila Municipal Code's landscaping requirements. 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to reduce the total width of 37 feet wide drive aisle to incorporate additional interior parking lot landscaping between the two rows of parking in the north parking lot along the east property line. 3. The roof top equipment shall be painted the same color as the building to minimize visibility from I -5. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Also, please be aware the followings items must be submitted prior to building permit issuance: 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements related to perimeter and interior parking lot landscaping listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. 1 Ye�ftr� .aAtiia+'.}inia'wwV:ieY ti wwry�= :eirti+wi��lN%a�t?.�,��.r_>: b'A�;+'l: 2. A boundary line adjustment to consolidate the two lots must be recorded prior to issuance of building permit. 3. Since the subject site lies in the quarantine established by the Washington State Department of Agriculture in relation to longhorned beetle. Applicant shall meet all Department of Agriculture requirements. 4. Applicant shall meet all Type 2 Special Permission approval conditions including providing a revised cost estimate for the mitigation work and a bond to guarantee the mitigation work. 5. Applicant must obtain Hydraulic Project Approval from the Washington State Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. 6. A separate sign permit must be obtained for any proposed signage. 7. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant shall provide detailed structural review of the mechanically earth stabilized systems. 8. The project shall include street frontage improvements along 51' Avenue South; improvements to South 154t Street and 52' Avenue intersection; and payment of a pro -rata shall be approved by Public Works, before the building permit is approved. Frontal improvements on 51st Avenue South shall include right -of -way dedication, curb, gutter, sidewalk, drainage, lighting, and paving based on the road classification and the traffic impact analysis. Traffic improvements include widening and a left turn pocket at South 154th Street and 52nd Avenue South. 12 Description Draw. No. Rev. No. Date or Rev. Date • Site Plan P1.01 6 11/06/01 Elevations P4.01 4 09/25/01 Elevations P4.02 4 09/25/01 Building/Site Cross - Section P4.03 4 09/25/01 Landscape L1 2 12/03/01 Landscape (material list) L2 2 12/03/01 To to! . Ihic & Bound Surve Cl Ori:. 07/13/01 Sensitive Area & Tree Survey C2 Orig. 07/13/01 Prelim . Gradin: Pavin: & Draina:e C3 Ori:. 07/13/01 Rendering (for color) -- -- -- Geotech letter w/ three photos of slope -- -- 11/09/01 Site cross sections (3 ea. 8.5x11) Part of Geotech Letter package -- -- 11/06/01 OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O R S D E V E L O P E R S January 16, 200y Dear Minnie: Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Design Review Board drawings Per your request for items for the Design Review Board we are enclosing ten packages, each containing the following: OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 925 - 453 -4100 Fax 425 - 453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila\Minnic Dltaliwal DRB dwgs 020116 .doc Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • an Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. Please call if there are missing documents, you need other documents, or if you need more copies. Sincerely, Opus No Andy Tabe Sr. Real E CC: C west, L.L.C. py of all to file Manager C•py of all to Bill Bieber P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal DRB dwgs 020116 .doc Pg 2/2 r Minnie Dhaliwal, Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila WA 98188 Re: Project L01 -051 OPUS Northwest, LLC 14910 - 51s Avenue South Dear Ms. Dhaliwal: J. RICHARD ARAMBURU JEFFREY M. EUSTIS Attorneys at Law 505 Madison Street, Suite 209 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625 -9515 Fax: (206) 682 -1376 January 16, 2002 (/4j, 61 Po e On behalf of Richard and Ginger Botham we write again to address the potential interference by the proposed development with their easements. The City has been previously informed that the Bothams own easements across the southerly and the easterly 25 feet of Lot 30 of the proposed office park site. The current plans revise the parking to place the parking access aisles upon these 25 -foot easements. This is an improvement over the prior plan. However, the proposed improvements across these easements interfere with the use of the full width of the easements. The current plan proposes to place landscaping along the easterly eight feet of the 25 -foot easement which runs along the easterly side of Lot 30 of the office park site. This plan also places approximately 20 feet of landscaping for the full width of the 25 -foot easement at the northeasterly corner of Lot 30. This landscaping is at the point that the easement connects with Lot 29, the property to which it is appurtenant. The current design also shows a slight obstruction to the 25 -foot easement along the southerly edge of Lot 30 at the curb cut and entrance. While these easements currently are not being used to access Lots 29 and 31, as owners of these easements the Bothams have a legal right to make use of these easements at any time in the future. Regardless of whether the landscaping is proposed in order to satisfy city code or simply to improve the appearance of the parking areas, the city's insistence upon the landscaping cannot lawfully terminate or otherwise abrogate the Bothams' rights to use of these easements. The Bothams' properties are not part of the application, the Bothams are not applicants and the City January 16, 2002 Page 2 has no legal basis to ask the Bothams to relinquish any rights to these easements. Regardless of the justification for the landscaping, its placement is subject to the right of the Bothams to insist upon its removal at the time they wish to make access to their properties. Thompson v. Smith, 59 Wn. 2d 397, 409, 267 P.2d 798 (1962) Such access could be for later development or it could be to access the septic drainfield which lies just to the north of the 25 -foot easement along the easterly side of Lot 30. In order to use these easements the Bothams need not first obtain development permits or other approvals from the city. Beebe v. Swerda, 58 Wn. App. 375, 793 P.2d 442 (1990). Upon reasonable notice the Bothams are lawfully entitled to ask that the easement obstructions be removed. See Thompson and Beebe. Further, the Bothams are legally entitled to insist upon the removal of these obstructions without cost to them. After all, the landscaping and curbing are interferences with legal interests held by the Bothams and it is not up to the Bothams to pay for the removal of interferences placed on their easements by others. The city's design review of the proposed development should give careful consideration to the limitations of its landscaping requirements in the event that it may wish to alter the landscaping or require contingent landscaping in the event the easements are eventually used by the Bothams. The Bothams are willing to enter into an agreement with OPUS regarding the potential future use of these easements. However, if no agreement can be reached, the above authorities make clear that the placement of improvements within the easements does not lessen or terminate the Bothams' easement rights. Thank you of your consideration of these comments. Please furnish to this office the results of the city's design review and provide to us notice of all furthe proceedings. JME /py cc: Andy Tabor Richard and Virginia Botham Si erely y usti I Minnie Dhaliwal, Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206 - 431 -3670 or 206- 431 -3685 f E1( 11:;21i = x '`) : 1 . 1 fax 206 -431 -3665 Re: Design Review Hearing January 24, 2002 @ 7:00 P.M. Project Lot -051 old name was Project Lot -050, Eo1 -018 OPUS Project at 14910 - 51st Ave S - Tukwila Richard & Virginia Botham 16334 Linden Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133 -5620 2 06 - 542 -7793 Owners of lots 29, 31 & 95 January 13, 2002 We are abutting Property owners of this project. We and our lawyer, Jeff Eustis, advised in writing the City of Tukwila of our two separate 25 -foot wide recorded road easements on this site during the comment period for this project under project numbers Lot -050 and Em-o18; consequently the project was redesigned to honor our two road easements and address other Tukwila Planning Department concerns. In reviewing the most recent plat drawings mailed to us for the redesigned projects (Lon -051), we note and protest that our two 25 -foot wide road easements are again obstructed. This is the first time we or our attorney have had the opportunity to review the new project plan with proposed landscaping maps, otherwise we and our attorney would have submitted our objections in writing to the City Of Tukwila during the comment period for Project Lol -o5o, Eon -o18. Maps P1.01 and L -1: Note road /utility /access easements 25 -feet wide along the south and east sides of Lot 30. However, the drive entrance dimension is 24 feet wide and should be 25 feet wide to conform with our legal easement. Additionally, the second 25 foot easement is overlaid with both an 8 -foot wide landscape buffer and an approximately 25' square corner planting which completely blocks the access road easement. It will be impossible for us to legally access our two properties via our easements with the current design. Trees and plantings are in the middle of our 25 -foot wide roadway easements. We would like guarantees from the City of Tukwila that this project will not be allowed until after all the unresolved Roadway /Utility easements and Surface Water Drainage on Lot 3o have been solved. Lot 30 is included in this project; lots 29 and 31 are not included in the project and their roadway /utilities easement rights encumber Lot 30. These recorded easements provide for a free and unencumbered egress and access along a 25' wide corridor, as well as access directly onto 51st Avenue S., at all times. The current plan does not abide by the easements' provisions. In addition to creating a landlocked parcel with no access /egress, the landscape buffer also prohibits maintenance access to existing utilities on lot 29. Dimensions of the obstructed easement area involved are substantial in addition to completely blocking access to Lots 29 and 31. These obstructions are approximately 2,300 square feet. Map C -1 Topographic and Boundary Survey for OPUS PARK 5/405 from the earlier project design (Project Lot -o5o, Eoi -oi8) clearly identifies the easement problem (quote follows). The easement problem is omitted in the Project Loi -051 paperwork that we received in the mail. We previously reviewed Site Plan P1.oi which omits landscaping. We first saw the landscaping that obstructs our easements on plat map L -1 in the Party of Record packet received 1/12/02. EASEMENTS; TWO EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFFECT /ENCUMBER THE OVERALL PROPERTY AND BOTH AFFECT TAX LOT 003o. Sincerely, Richard & Virginia Botham Attachments: Eustis letter dated 9/6/01 Botham letter dated 9/7/01 2 Plat Maps showing the 2 recorded easements Opus plat map detailing easements problem cc: Jeff Eustis, Attorney 1) A.F. 6299225, SOUTH 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES 2) A.F. 8701270486, SOUTH 25 FEET AND EAST 25 FEET FOR ROADEWAYAND UTILITIES THE BENEFITING PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 0029 AND TAX LOT 0031. IF THESE PARCELS WERE MERGED INTO TAX LOT 0030, THE EASEMENT WOULD BE EXTINGUISHED. In order to fully access our properties and respect the legality of the easements, we are respectfully requesting that "No Parking — Violators Will Be Towed" signs be required and enforced on these two easements so this area does not become overflow parking /storage area. After removing and /or relocating the landscaping off of both our entire easements to return to the 25 -foot easement, we are requesting that a sufficiently sized [we recommend a minimum 6" height and 1' width] low-slope rolled curb be installed at the two egress /access points of our lots so as to divert surface water toward the project's drain and surface water detention system and away from our downhill property. All water runoff from the proposed parking area should be diverted to a drainage collection system. Additional paved surface water runoff will acerbate an already existing drainage runoff situation. With these two low -slope rolled curbs we can access our two properties. We can drive over a low -slope rolled curb. z Z I - ' 6 00 CO C CO w • 0 � Q = • d w z I- 0 Z F- LU • co O — O I— w w U. w Z U O ~ z MEMORANDUM City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner Jack Pace, Planning Manager FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist ' ;r" DATE: January 10, 2002 RE: Opus Park Office Building: Wetland/Watercourse Review — Type 2 Permit Permit #'s E01 -018 & L01 -051. Per your request, I have reviewed a portion of the revised submittal for the Opus Northwest project — Opus Park 5/405 located along the east side of 51 Avenue S. The submittal includes a Preliminary Landscape Plan (Site Studio Landscape Architecture, revised 12/3/01) and Watercourse Mitigation Report (A.J.Brederg, B& A Inc., revised 12/12/01). This review is focused on a Type 2 Special Permission for watercourse relocation and buffer reduction approval. My review comments and recommendations are listed as follows: Preliminary Landscape Plan — Watercourse Plantings The current planting plan is near completion; however, there are several details that will need to be addressed before the final building approval. 1. The plant quantities need to be identified and shown in the plant legend. The quantities used for mitigation will be the basis for determining a portion of the sensitive area performance security. 2. The performance security estimate that has been provided left out some trees and does not appear to include labor for the installation. The grading work also appears to be underestimated for the new watercourse channel work. It is not clear where the separation is between sensitive area plantings and formal landscape plantings. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 - 3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 - 3665 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor r,:aaaNCCV;nxramez4:mPax *10.71W..t13grivdtWiNe«•�;»sr':. 40. Opus Park Memo — Type 2 Permission January 10, 2002 Page 2 3. A tree permit is required because trees are being removed within sensitive areas — watercourse buffers and steep slopes (20 percent + gradient). The replacement trees can be planted within the watercourse mitigation area but are considered as a requirement that is additional to formal landscaping. The tree permit is included in the watercourse mitigation plan approval. The area adjacent to the new (mitigation) watercourse and its buffer is the preferred location to plant additional trees. The current planting plan shows this location as mostly salal. Adding tree and shrub cover will provide more functional habitat and better survivability. Site Plan 1. The Preliminary Site Plan — P1.01 indicates a 35 -foot buffer on the south side of the watercourse that crosses the southwest corner of the project site. All the other sheets /drawings are showing 15 feet for this watercourse buffer. Please correct for consistency. 2. The City does not have Type 3 and Type 2 ditches; however, the Sensitive Areas Ordinance does include Type 3 and Type 2 Watercourses. The City may be regulating streams within ditches or artificial channels and these are referred to as "Watercourses ". This labeling needs to be corrected on most of the submitted drawings. Watercourse Mitigation Report The watercourse mitigation report (B &A Inc. 12/01) includes the typical components of mitigation. The goals of mitigation are to replace the watercourse functions, increase habitat, and improve water quality. Check dams within the new channel will prevent erosion and the area will be vegetated. 1. The performance standard is 80 percent survival at the end of three years of maintenance and monitoring. 2. The construction plan section includes "retention of designated trees" and states "save and protect all existing willows and native vegetation ". Some existing _ vegetation in the new watercourse area is native (Pacific willow trees) and should be retained if possible. 3. Non - native, invasive plants will be removed prior to installing the new plantings. 4. Irrigation will be provided for all planting areas. The landscape contractor shall provide warranty for the plant material and installation for a period of one year from the date of final acceptance. Opus Park Memo — Type 2 Permission January 9, 2002 Page 3 5. Monitoring will be a period of three years to document plant survival (at least 80 %) and the condition of the channel. If plant survival falls below the performance standard, a contingency plan could be implement to make corrections or changes to the plan. 6. The performance security will need to be revised as it appears to be underestimated for this project. 7. The mitigation timing section states the new watercourse will be installed early into the project construction and prior to piping of existing watercourses Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director .... -! s,...,4.. _ . - R...,. .,..N.'t.��., ......,kv..i�Ew.....w v.a..;...'.«: To: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION January 10, 2002 • Andy Taber, Opus LLC(applicant) • Sheila Burns, Johann Pollinger (owners) • King County Assessor, Accounting Division • Agencies with interest (listed on affidavit of mailing) • Richard & Virginia Botham (Party of record) 16334 Linden Avenue North, Shoreline WA 98133 -5620 This letter serves as a Notice of Decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170. The Director of Community Development hereby approves the proposed piping of Type 3 watercourses and reduction of 50 % buffer of Type 2 watercourse for relocation of Type 3 watercourse in association with the proposed three story 69,920 square feet office building at 14910 -51S Avenue South with the following condition: Additionally, the applicant must note the following items: '0W�RkY IN.:SWY e:.' 7. .it.Y.kklK'tY1WZL4`tiC 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant must revise the cost estimate for enhancement work to accurately reflect the cost of work to be performed and monitoring associated with it. The revised cost estimate must be approved by the City and the applicant will be required to produce a bond to guarantee performance, monitoring and maintenance pertaining to the piping and rerouting of the two Type 3 watercourses. 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant shall obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this project from Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife if such a permit is required by Department of Fish and Wildlife. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. Attachment H 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 PROJECT BACKGROUND REQUESTS: FILE NUMBER: L01 -051 Type 2, Special Permission permit- Director's approval to place an existing Type 3 watercourse (north stream) in a culvert underneath the parking and driveways and also to place a portion of the second Type 3 watercourse in a culvert. The mitigation for the north stream includes relocation of the watercourse and enhancements in a portion of the buffer area of the I -5 stream (Type 2 watercourse). This request for Sensitive Areas Ordinance deviation is associated with the proposed three -story 69, 920 square feet office building. APPLICANT: Andy Taber, Opus Northwest LLC 915 - 118`'' Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue WA 98005 OWNER: Sheila Burns, Johann Pollinger. ASSOCIATED PERMITS: SEPA (A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on December 18, 2001.) Design Review (Notice of application was issued on August 27, 2001. It is scheduled for public hearing on January 24, 2002) Development Permit LOCATION: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION: The project is located in NW quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The project site is located on tax lot numbers 7661600030 and 7661600061, which are west of I -5 and east of 51' Avenue South. The street address is 14910 51' Avenue South, Tukwila. Office (0) L01 -072- Notice of Decision Page 2 of 4 NOTICE: Notice of Application for this Type 2 permit was issued on December 21, 2001. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. 1. The name of the appealing party, L01 -072- Notice of Decision Page 3 of 4 The decision on this permit application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code Section 18.104.010. A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) was issued for the development of the property described above, pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 21.04. The other land use application (Design Review) is still pending and scheduled for public hearing on January 24, 2001. No administrative appeal of the DNS is permitted. One administrative appeal of the Decision on this permit itself, excluding challenges to the DNS, is permitted. In order to appeal the decision on this permit, a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 14 days of the issuance of this decision. The requirements for such appeals area set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 18.116. All appeal materials shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Appeal materials shall contain: 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party, and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to received notices on the appealing party's behalf, and 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in that decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed, the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any administrative appeal regarding the permit shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Tukwila Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. Any party wishing to challenge the Planning Commission's decision on this application must file an appeal in King County Superior Court within 21 days of the issuance of a Notice of Decision by the Planning Commission pursuant to the procedures set forth in RCW ch. 36.70C. Any challenge to DNS issued for development of this property must be included in such an appeal to Superior Court. If no appeal of the decision on this permit is properly filed in Superior Court within such time limit, the decision on this permit shall be final and the City's approval of the DNS will be final for both this permit and the other pending permit applications for the development of this subject property. z ~ JU 0 0 0 U J • LLI w • 0 LLa = • a �.. w z F- zI- w co w U� 0— o F- w w I F-� LI 0 w z U= o � z *VP L01 -072- Notice of Decision Page 4 of 4 Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit(s) are available for inspection at the Tukwila Dept. of Community Development; 6300 Southcenter Blvd.; Suite 100; Tukwila, WA; from Monday through Friday, between 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM. The project planner is Minnie Dhaliwal, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3685 for further information. \, Steve Lan .h ster Director Community Development City of Tukwila Location: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan Designation: City of Tukwila I. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION II. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Opus Office Building I- 5/405. File Number: L01 -072 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATED JANUARY 10, 2002 This Type 2 permit (Special Permission- Director) is to seek Director's approval to pipe and reroute one existing Type 3 watercourse; pipe a portion of a second Type 3 watercourse; and reduce the buffer of a Type 2 watercourse by 50% to relocate the piped Type 3 watercourse. This Sensitive Areas Ordinance deviation request is in association with the proposal to construct a three story 69,920 square feet office building and 164 parking stalls on an approximately 3.3 acre site. The north watercourse is proposed to be tightlined its entire length and rerouted between I -5 watercourse (Type 2) and eastern edge of the parking lot. The relocated stream and the mitigation plantings will be in the buffer area for the I -5 watercourse. Therefore the applicant is also requesting a 50% buffer reduction in the width of the Type 2 watercourse buffer. Approximately 40 feet of the second watercourse is proposed to be tightlined to provide access to the site. Mitigation for this watercourse includes enhancements at the existing location. Applicant: Andy Taber Opus Northwest LLC 915 - 118` Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue WA 98005 The project is located in NW quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. The project site is located on tax lot numbers 7661600030 and 7661600061, which are west of I -5 and east of 51 Avenue South. The street address is 14910 51 Avenue South, Tukwila. The current zoning for the subject site is Office (0). The current Comprehensive Plan for the subject site is Office (0). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 • Associated Permits: SEPA (A Determination of Non - Significance was issued on December 18, 2001.) Design Review (Notice of application was issued on August 27, 2001. It is scheduled for public hearing on January 24, 2002) Development Permit Notice: Notice of Application for this Type 2 permit was issued on December 21, 2001. The following information was considered as part of review of this application: 1. Following environmental reports and studies: a) Wetland Delineation report by B & A Inc. (Bredberg & Associates, Inc) dated 2/15/01, b) Peer review of the wetland report prepared by Adolfson Associates dated 4/25/01, c) Wetland/watercourse peer review memo by Gary Schultz dated 4/16/01, d) Addendum to wetland report by Bredberg & Associates, Inc dated 9/21/01 e) Wetland/watercourse review memo prepared by Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist dated November 20, 2001. f) Watercourse Mitigation report prepared by B &A Inc., dated September 21, 2001 and revised 12/12/01. g) Watercourse mitigation report review memo prepared by Gary Schultz, Urban Environmentalist dated January 10, 2002. Preliminary Site Plan prepared by Sconzo Hallstrom architects dated revised on 11 -06- 01, Topographic /Boundary Survey and Sensitive area/Tree Survey prepared by Gerald C Retzlaff, Preliminary Grading, Paving, Drainage and Utility Plan prepared by Hugh G Goldsmith and Associates, Preliminary Landscaping Plan prepared by Site Studio Landscape architects dated revised on 12/03/01. 3. a) Preliminary Findings Geotechnical Engineering study dated November 15, 2000 prepared by Terra Associates Inc. b) Geotechnical report and site sections prepared by Terra Associates dated September 21, 2001, c) Supplemental geotechnical review dated November 9, 2001, by Terra Associates analyzing grade transitions and impacts to groundwater as a result of placing fill on the site. 4. Level 1 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Control Plan, prepared by Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc, dated July 2001. NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, Phone: 206- 431 -3685. 2 '! ^1 + O`I.Yt^t'J'F4ww A .j1 e.i� '«i -Iw!Jw z ii- ~ w JU 00 CO In J = F- w �Q CO z � I- 0 Z I- w U • � O 52 o � wW I F- 0 .. z w U 2 O ~ z was 0' OVORT yCtiiv^3 III. BACKGROUND /PROPOSAL The project site contains two Type 3 watercourses that flow from the west and a Type 2- watercourse segment along the East Side within the WSDOT I -5 right -of -way that eventually flows into Gilliam Creek. There are two offsite wetland areas with some buffer areas extending onto the site: Type 2 wetland with a 50 feet buffer on the south side and Type 3 offsite wetland with a 25 feet buffer on the north side. No work is proposed to be performed within the wetlands or their associated buffers. The northern Type 3 watercourse flows from the east into the I -5 watercourse and does not directly flow into a wetland. It is a maintained drainage channel with low riparian/habitat function and is proposed for piping under the parking lot. Per Tukwila Municipal Code mitigation is required for piping to replace the open channel and its functions. It is proposed to be tightlined its entire length and rerouted between I -5 watercourse (Type 2) and eastern edge of the parking lot. The relocated stream and the mitigation plantings will be in the buffer area for the I -5 watercourse. Therefore the applicant is also requesting a 50% buffer reduction in the width of the Type 2 watercourse buffer. The second Type 3 watercourse is located in the southwest corner of the subject site and it does not directly flow into the I -5 watercourse but dissipates into the off -site wetland. Approximately 40 feet of this watercourse is proposed to be tightlined to provide access to the site. Mitigation for this watercourse includes enhancements at the existing location. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE A. Type and Rating of the watercourses: Pursuant to the definition of a watercourse listed under Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.06.920, and watercourse rating criteria listed under TMC 18.45.020 (D), the two East -West watercourses are determined to be Type 3 watercourses and the WSDOT I -5 watercourse is determined to be a Type 2 watercourse. This determination was based on the review of environmental studies submitted by the applicant; peer review by the City's Urban Environmentalist (Gary Schultz); and peer review by the City's environmental consultant (Adolfson and Associates). B. Piping and rerouting of the two Type 3 watercourses: This entire length of the north Type 3 watercourse is proposed to be tightlined and then rerouted between the I -5 watercourse and eastern edge of the parking lot. Pursuant to TMC 18.45.080 (D), piping in a watercourse sensitive area requires approval of the Director and must meet the criteria outlined in TMC 18.45.080 (D)(6). 3 z I I :1- w 6 O 0 (0 0 • W � _ CO LL w 0 H 0 P- O I— w W • U LL- w z O ~ z Following is the analysis of how the proposed piping and rerouting meets that criteria: a. Piping of any watercourse should be avoided. Piping may be allowed in any watercourse if it is necessary for access purposes. Piping may be allowed in Type 3 z watercourses if the applicant complies with the conditions of this section, including: i z (1) Providing excess capacity to meet needs of the system during a 100 year flood w w event; and 0 (2) Providing flow restrictors, and complying with water quality and existing habitat 0 0 enhancement procedures. u) w J = 1-- The north watercourse is a Type 3 watercourse and is proposed to be piped under the co w w access and parking area and it will be re- routed to create a new channel for the entire 2 length to be piped. It is not feasible to keep this watercourse as an open channel at its g Z1 current location and relocation of this watercourse is necessary due to site conditions "- co and the amount of fill material required for grading. The 40 foot section of the south = watercourse that is also a Type 3 watercourse is proposed to be piped for providing Z i access to the subject site. The piped section will provide excess capacity to meet 0 needs of the system during a 100 -year flood event and this shall be documented w w w during detailed drainage review at the time of building permit review. The mitigation 2 o plan states that check dams will be provided in the new channel to prevent any vo cn erosion. 0 ►— ww b. No process that requires maintenance on a regular basis will be acceptable unless 0 this maintenance process is part of the regular and normal facilities maintenance w z process or unless the applicant can show funding for this maintenance is ensured. U 0~ Not applicable. c. Piping in a watercourse sensitive area shall be limited and shall require approval of the Director. Piping projects shall be performed pursuant to the following applicable standards: (1) The conveyance system shall be designed to comply with the standards in current use and recommended by the Department of Public Works. The proposal meets this criterion. (2) Where allowed, piping shall be limited to the shortest length possible as determined by the Director to allow access onto a property. The entire north watercourse is proposed to be piped. However, a new channel is proposed for the entire length to be piped with enhancement plantings made along the entire length to improve and replace the functions resulting from piping. Only that portion of the south watercourse is proposed to be piped that is required to obtain correct grades inorder to access the property. 4 ei `" . • kOi R �x `S: A3Ri., ni': �rti�. s. r�' #.i'?iCtia:,£�y,�Sua`Y1rAi C�fT''.!3^V`eY�','il'tG;YY� �zttw:'�. ` „_. z (3) Where water is piped for an access point, those driveways or entrances shall be consolidated to serve multiple properties where possible, and to minimize the length of piping. At this time no entrances or driveways are proposed in proximity to the south access point that warrant a shared access for adjoining properties. (4) When required by the Director, watercourses under drivable surfaces shall be contained in an arch culvert using oversize or superspan culverts for rebuilding of a stream bed. These shall be provided with check dams to reduce flows, and shall be replanted and enhanced according to a plan approved by the Director. Not applicable. (S) When necessary to provide for fish passage, fish ladders shall be 1-foot vertical rise to10 foot horizontal distance, or as approved by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. There is no indication of presence of fish in the two Type 3 watercourses. (6) Stormwater runoff shall be detained and infiltrated to preserve the watercourse channel's dominant discharge. The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual standards. Detailed drainage design shall be reviewed at the time of building permit review. (7) All construction shall be designed to have the least adverse impact on the watercourse, buffer and surrounding environment. The project shall meet all King County Surface Water Design Manual requirements pertaining to erosion and sedimentation control. Best Management Practices shall be followed to ensure least adverse impact to the watercourse, buffer and surrounding environment during construction. (8) Piping shall be constructed during periods of low flow, or as specified by the State Department of Fish and Wildlife. There is no indication of presence of fish in the two watercourses. Applicant shall contact Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and meet all their applicable requirements. If required by Department of Fish of Wildlife, applicant shall obtain the Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) prior to issuance of building permit. (9) Water quality must be as good or better for any water exiting the pipe as for the water entering the pipe, and flow must be comparable. The project meets this criterion. 5 C. Mitigation and monitoring associated with piping and rerouting of the two Type III watercourses: Applicant submitted a watercourse mitigation report prepared by B &A Inc., landscape plan prepared by Site Studio Landscape architects and Site Plan prepared by Sconzo Hallstrom architects. These were reviewed by the City's Urban Environmentalist, Gary Schultz. See attached memo dated January 10, 2002, for Gary's comments. TMC Section 18.45.080 (D)(2), lists the mitigation and performance standards required for any mitigation plan associated with watercourses. The project meets the following minimum performance standards for approved stream alterations as listed under TMC 18.45.080(D)(2),: (a) Maintenance or improvement of stream channel dimensions, including the components of depth, width, length and gradient of the original location, (b) Bank and buffer configuration should be restored to an equal or enhanced state of the original stream, (c) The channel, bank and buffer areas shall be replanted with native vegetation which replicates or improves the original in species, sizes and densities, (d) The stream channel bed and the biofiltration systems shall be equivalent to or better than in the original stream, (e) The original fish and wildlife habitat shall be maintained or enhanced, (f) Relocation of a watercourse shall not result in the new sensitive area or buffer extending beyond the development site and onto adjacent property without the agreement of the affected property owners, (g) A watercourse may be rerouted; However prior to issuance of building permit, applicant must revise the cost estimate for enhancement work to accurately reflect the cost of work to be performed and monitoring associated with it. The revised cost estimate must be approved by the City and the applicant will be required to produce a bond to guarantee performance, monitoring and maintenance as they pertain to the piping and rerouting of the two Type 3 watercourses. Also, prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. D. Variation of a standard watercourse buffer of Type 2 watercourse. The North -South I -5 watercourse is a Type 2 watercourse that requires a 35 -foot buffer. The applicant's proposal includes relocation of the north Type 3 watercourse in the I -5 watercourse buffer. 6 z z • w J O 0 W J = F Qw 0 The request to reduce the buffer of I -5 watercourse by 50% meets the above listed 2 code criteria. g w co V. COMMENTS = 1-1 z � Notice of application was issued on December 21, 2001. No comments were received z O related to this application. w w 2 • p U o 9 ' O H Approval of the project to pipe and reroute one existing Type 3 watercourse; pipe a 40- v foot portion of a second Type 3 watercourse; and reduce the buffer of a Type 2 w ~O watercourse by 50% to relocate the piped Type 3 watercourse with the following z condition: v 0 I VI. Pursuant to TMC 18.45.040 (C), the Director may reduce the standard watercourse buffer on a case by case basis, provided the buffer does not contain slopes 20% or greater and the approved buffer width shall not result in greater than 50% reduction in width and the reduced buffer is not less than ten feet for watercourses. Also, the buffer reduction shall not result in direct or indirect, short-term or long -term adverse impact to the watercourse and that 1) the buffer is vegetated and includes an enhancement plan as may be required to improve the buffer function and value; or 2) if there is no significant vegetation in the buffer, a buffermay be reduced only if an enhancement plan is provided. The plan must include using a variety of native vegetation that improves the functional attributes of the buffer and provides additional protection for the watercourse functions and values. RECOMMENDATION 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant must revise the cost estimate for enhancement work to accurately reflect the cost of work to be performed and monitoring associated with it. The revised cost estimate must be approved by the City and the applicant will be required to produce a bond to guarantee performance, monitoring and maintenance pertaining to the piping and rerouting of the two Type 3 watercourses. Additionally, the applicant must note the following items: 1. Prior to issuance of building permit, applicant shall obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) for this project from Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife if such a permit is required by Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2. Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet all the tree permit requirements i.e. all trees removed from sensitive area buffers including areas with slopes greater than 20 percent must be replaced based on regulations and tree replacement ratios listed under TMC 18.54.130. Also, all other landscape requirements listed under TMC Chapter 18.52 must be met. 7 z fr State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan(Tci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 15.104.1 10 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on • 10- C Z-- the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 6 i i 42 1 k 9it 5 A06 SDso as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number L-©\ -051 . I herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove an property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fo On this day personally appeared before me individual who executed the foregoing instrument an acknowledged t voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 1C day of , 2P7U�� _�A '�� JA. 14 .. OILILA NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Sta Washing nn rte otiac'te My commission expires on lediately (14 day i /ii / / • ppl er Project residing at Be .Q.V(ti.Q t WA- ie sign at the letter. pager's Signature to me known to the signed the same a hi her' r:^f:)... Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , .L t5SL -gf HEREBY DECLARE THAT: )( Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non- Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Number: "--(,i-- off( Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Person requesting mailing: 7 ,� Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application • Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other v. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this C O r of JA) in the year 200; P:GIN A WYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM G'� s+:;,�ia;Lfk' ±:%�;K }rra ;4;1s•: A•'C; V Lc6.xY�r . in.:}v i+,w {ri!i i �ewrJ'�7'xa "+�•Y:lv . figs;= �.''�::, z � cc 2 0 0 co - = F-- � w 2 g Q �w z = I- 0 w U • � O - o 1- W • uJ Lo ..z w — • I 0 I z VOW s Project Name: OPUS; NIA) Project Number: "--(,i-- off( Mailer's Signature: 24LIA/L 4 Person requesting mailing: 7 ,� 2 t ifI nt°_ v. Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this C O r of JA) in the year 200; P:GIN A WYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM G'� s+:;,�ia;Lfk' ±:%�;K }rra ;4;1s•: A•'C; V Lc6.xY�r . in.:}v i+,w {ri!i i �ewrJ'�7'xa "+�•Y:lv . figs;= �.''�::, z � cc 2 0 0 co - = F-- � w 2 g Q �w z = I- 0 w U • � O - o 1- W • uJ Lo ..z w — • I 0 I z VOW s Permits applied for include: • Design Review City of Tukwila JANUARY 10, 2002 CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF HEARING PROJECT INFORMATION Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Opus NW, L.L.C. has filed an application for Design Review, File Number L01 -051, to construct a 69,920 square foot office building located at 14910 -51' Avenue South, Tukwila. You are invited to comment on the project at a public hearing scheduled for January 24, 2002, at 7:00 p.m. before the Planning Commission. The hearing will take place at City Hall in City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. To confirm the time and date before the hearing, call the Department of Community Development at 206 - 431 -3670. For further information on this proposal, contact Minnie Dhaliwal at 206 - 431 -3685 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Other known required permits include: • Type 2 Special Permission Director for Sensitive Area Ordinance Deviation • SEPA • Development Permit FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW Steven M. Mullet, Mayor The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the permit counter of the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 11100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 -KU: , awrsvawvwrrtn r .....Abkrr1Kusazzm'''.Cs.. Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, 1 /�Jr 0 r ik, /pq,,v HEREBY DECLARE THAT: v x e '/ ✓r � - N tice of Public Hea�rgj�4 �o J c,� Project Number: Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: "y y1 I " Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit X __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle'WA 98111 Other FP, VDU ( lC� �'� � Ova Was m o i l e d to each of the addresses listed on this /0 day of g the year 2062, P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: QfLu Project Number: .� f Mailer's Signature: ti'Lf Zt /2 u214L52 Person requesting mailing: "y y1 I " Was m o i l e d to each of the addresses listed on this /0 day of g the year 2062, P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM 6 v abutting our land. Richard & Virginia Botham 16334 Linden Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133-5620 2 54 bothamtserv_net Owners of lots 29, 31 & 95 September 7, 2001 z w a: 2 Minnie Dhaliwal, Planner v v 0 Department of Community Development o City of Tukwila w 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 -' I- Tukwila, WA 98188 u- 206 -431 -3670 or 206- 431 -3685 w mdhaliwalTukwila.wa.us 5 c t fax 206 -431 -3665 = • a Re: Project L01 -050, Eo1 -018 Z i OPUS Project at 14910 - 51st Ave S - Tukwila ~O z F- w u � We have read the project file and are abutting Property owners of this project. We support o reasonable development but have questions about several design issues within this project. vO cn O F- 1. This project has several engineered retention walls along various property lines = W I U LL. O a. High wall at the NW corner of Burns property w z UN When this retention wall is installed along the property line, we want assurances p that our land will not be dug on, or disturbed. We do not want our land to slide downhill onto the project site during or after excavation /construction of the engineered retaining wall. b. Parking wall along E side of Burns property and N side of Pollinger property Will this engineered retaining wall have seepholes that drain water from the development onto our property or will all water drainage from this project be directed into the project's surface water system. We request that all surface water drainage flow through the water cleaning detention vault underneath the parking lot, and then south (no north overflow during storms, please) into a developer created "stream" that flows into the south - flowing DOT ditch and not drain or overflow onto abutting properties. We are especially concerned these parking lot retention walls will act as drainage traps and channel water onto our property via seepage either under the walls or thru specific outlets left in the walls for just such a purpose. 2. This project has minimal surface water retention capacity (Level 1, not Level 2). If we have a 10 -year storm (very common: e.g. this past August's 2" in 24 hours), a 20 -year storm, a 50 -year storm or a 100 -year storm, where will all the excess stormwater overflow into the DOT ditch or onto abutting properties? Is it possible to require Level 2 stormwater detention for this project? 1 Sincerely, Richard & Virginia Botham According to the file, this project is 77% impermeable surface (3.3 acres) and will provide Level 1 control standards for surface water. The file says it will meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Standards for 2 -year and 10 -year storms. The ditch that collects stormwater from ditches along 5181 Ave South will be piped underground and released without cleaning into the DOT ditch on the west side of I -5. 3. This project adds an unusually large amount of fill and requires much re- shaping of the land contours. Will a sufficient bond be required to guarantee the continued reliability of the engineered retaining walls, guarantee to cover all correction and restoration costs associated any failures, and that NO drainage water will overflow onto our property? We own property [downhill, ] abutting the retaining walls. 4. Reading the file, I found staff comments indicating that parking stalls are undersized and an excess are for subcompacts; the parking stalls as configured do not meet Tukwila code requirements for size or mix. Additional parking is not available on 51st Avenue South or anywhere else nearby. Please require adequate parking for this project. 5. Map C -1 has notes re easements and Map C -4 shows a 25 -foot wide utility /access easement along the south and east sides of Lot 3o. We would like guarantees from the City of Tukwila that this project will not be allowed until after the unresolved Roadway /Utility easements on Lot 3o have been solved. Lot 30 is included in this project; lots 29 and 31 are not included in the project and their roadway /utilities easement rights encumber Lot 3o. These recorded easements provide for a free and unencumbered egress and access along a 25' wide corridor, as well as access directly onto 51st avenue S., at all times. The current plan does not abide by the easements' provisions. Map C -1 Topographic and Boundary Survey for OPUS PARK 5/405 says: 5. EASEMENTS; TWO EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFFECT /ENCUMBER THE OVERALL PROPERTY AND BOTH AFFECT TAX LOT 0030. 1) A.F. 6299225, SOUTH 25 FEET FOR ROADWAYAND UTILITIES 2) A.F. 8701270486, SOUTH 25 FEET AND EAST 25 FEET FOR ROADEWAYAND UTILITIES THE BENEFITING PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 0029 AND TAX LOT 0031. IF THESE PARCELS WERE MERGED INTO TAX LOT 0030, THE EASEMENT WOULD BE EXTINGUISHED. I I: r e o »f4 This sketch is not based upon a survey of the.pr'pertir described in Order No. lve: of 5 of cc° Title Insurance Company of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show ail roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes so liability for inaccuracies therein. KIVt1, - 4 r �o • ‘ 50.7)-1,4 41 This skescb is not based upon a survey of the.prnperty described in Order No. v � 3 of 5 a f " . O Title Insurance Company of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of situating in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show aJl roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. / • �o I' A (D ± "�: - t, �A�;.Y'ai�Crk >Wi.FA:.vS:s•y;.(; �yTV... V ' r�i�rbl�6v 3ssM++�.i:/Mb�lwlNn.4N V:�? u 11 STREET 47 0 so • . 11 61.0 IL CTR. GRA Mi • 75.4 - 4 111 • TRUTT POLE H en SiOL • MI Pal / MAR. KW • STATER PETER T MA WATER VALVE • TYPE I CATOS SAME • TYPE I EATON SAME • • HOLM MOLE • • TUT PIT MAMA) • . TENT HOLE ISREOBO ) IS SLOPES 011 OR SKATER 10 30 • SCALE: f • 30' 12 At,at1ICM (COAAJi LINE OF TRACTS 3 Mtv) 4 OF SEATTLE LAND CO. 5,,ACRE TRACTS). MALMCE OF THE INTERIOR EAST - ST LOT LINES %CtS PM KTMEDN THE AT =SCRIM) LIME MO THE LINIE COROT 10 TRACTS 7 AND SAID PLAT (NORTH MARGIN W S0. 131ST). THE OVERALL EAST BOUNDARY R1014T OF OF 1-6) IS SHOW PER SCHRUE701 SURVEY. UPON REVIEW OF THE 0001 RIOM- OF -NAY PLANS THIS LINE WY CANOE SLIGHTLY. THE IIORTIM K U T T I LINE N U M TAX LOT 0011 AND 0053 I S SUIJECT TO VARIOUS INTLRRALTATIOA AS TO LOCATION. FU1TI+01 RESEARCH AND EVALUATION MOULD Sc REWORD .IN:TIC.MNT::TRAT A.DVIMITIVE.LOCATION of. THIS INTEIIoft ::J1: KCCICS :ORITICAL: ..,, 3. EASOCNTS t TT O EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFTECT/DIO1113 R THE OVERALL PROPERTY A/O SOTN ASPECT TAX LOT 0030. I) A.F. 4211223. SOUTH 23 FEET FOR ROABtAV A10 UTILITIES • 2) ' A.F. 4701270461, SOUTH 23 FEET AND EAST 23 FEET FOR ROADTAV AND UTILITIES TIC 60IEFITTINO PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 002) MO TAX LOT 0031. IF THOSE PARCELS WERE IEIGCD INTO TAX LOT 0030, THE EA30Q4T MWLD K EXTINGUISHED. "lion TITLE RVORTII I RE RECEIVED rpao.murawa TITLE_ I10JIUMC2 t. COMPANY AND EVALUATED AS FDLLORSr• I) ORDER II 00�, 0 /23/2000 REPORT 0113 1) 170144 0030 10/23/2000 3) 210 024 ITIOR 0011 1E /1u20000 PROJECT JJRG1 A SLPPLEMENT I TO 210 cM ITOST CO54ITIO4T 1/6/2001 4) 170143 0011 10/23/2000 3) 170141 0013 10/23/2000 /) 170141 0012 10/23 /2000 7) 170131 0010 10/23/2000 0014 0120 PROJECT AREA 1 4) 170140 0121 10/23/2000 1) NO REPORT 0203 NO REPORT SUPPLEMENT II TO 2M) COYITIOLT COMITIOR TO ORDER .470144 ELIMINATED A PREVIOUS RAFT'S EASELOIT PER A.F. 0303464 7. METOPES. DITCHES, AND/OR IIHEMR SNOW HEREON REIE I DOLT I F 1 ED MO/OR DELINEATED 1Y A.J. ME0010 NO ASSOCIATES IN OECC1a101 2000. AND JANUARY 2001 MD SURVEYED BY GOLDSMITH l ASSOCIATES IN TIC SANE PERIOD. PRELIMINARY WETLAND AJO/OIR STREAM SUFFERS NM SNOW RASO ON INFOX•AT104 PROVIDED ST THE WETLAND 1IOL.001ST AM) IS **ACT TO REVISION. S. TOPOGRAPHIC INTONATION SHORN HEREON WAS COLLECTED IN TIC FIELD CN JMtARY 2001 AND IS CURRENT TO THAT DATE ONLY. 1. SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EOLAL TO 200E AND GREATER TAN 10' IN NEIOHT ARE SHOW METEOR AS INTERPOLATED mom A TRIANGULAR IRREGULAR IQTM011K OF THE SITE TOM. 10. PROJECT AREA A AND PROJECT AREA 1 SO MDARIES ARE PRELIMINARY AND SUOJECT TO REVISION AS THE PROJECT PROCEEDS 1ONAR0 CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT AREA A (PER TRAICNATION TITLE REPORT NOS. $70141 AND 170144) THAT PORTION CT TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 3 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VCUAC 4 OF PLATS. PAGE 90. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: KOIININO AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4. WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE MORAY NCO. I; THENCE WESTERLY ALPO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 130 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE DISTANCE or NORIIOLY PARALLEL WITH THE MOST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4. A DISTAN OF 111.23 FEET; H MC KITELY TO A POINT ON TIC PEST LINE or SAID TRACT 4. A DISTANCE 146 PEST SOUTHERLY OF THE IIOITIOCIT COFER TILROCF• THOLE SOUttOLY TO TIC 3CUT1 ST GORIER OF SAID TRACT 41 THCCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT or =GINNING; TOGETHER WITH TRACT S OF SEATTLE LAND COPM.Y'1 3 ACRE TRACTS. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME S OF PLATS. PACE SO. ALCCROS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT TMMT PORTICO. DEEDED FOR PRIMARY STATE HIOIIIAY NO. ( SRS BY DEEDS RECCROW LOOM RECORDING NOS. 5464213 AND 3324311. LYIMO EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECOR:E0 woo RECORDING ND. 3641102; SITUATE IN THE CITY Cf TU011LA, COUNTY OF KIND. STATE Of WASHINGTON. PROJECT AREA S (PER 1RANSHATION TITLE REPORT NOS. 470136 AND 170140) TRACT 7 OF SEATTLE LAID C MPANY'S 1 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECCADED IN VOLIAC I CF PLATS, PAGE S0, RECCl10S OF KING CO3NTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION COCOONED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COPT CAUSE NCO. 154263, P0R PRIMARY STATE HIO44AY NO. I; SITUATE IN THE CITY Cf TUOYILA, CONTY Cf KINO, STATE OF ITASHINOTON. TOTAL KTLMO ARIA ►ER MLDKA• • ASSOC. • 1.44 AOKI OPUS N.W. L.L.C. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR Jot NO. 00112 • ' • r. Cfii6k1.'; SLy. lttkj:.' SGCac'...;:!- Iw" i�, Swt :�.i:�r"ii.`.,""t,:'.��:.•.,.n r.�'C,- ° <C ±S3S�:;i'Rr+::Y.. ktila r.. tita; <rv- .w.w.+un.,a..� +,.es++r : ,,..., .,..,:....zw »r:.n..:ta... u''x =;r•.m„re�.::rrb«ea, O Hugh C. Goldsmith t Anocl* tea, Inc. Consulting Ingham • Surveyors • Planners 2211 IUn Amu U 1.I•... •1 11101 P.O. M. IOU MA S /u -taw M21.... 11 wool 12.1 1111 48P771 01 111M 1 , 1 ••• 1.• I•M • ' • 40•41 f • IM' •• n•tl•um • s. • Os • • rnl.•I• S1 saa • Ast KNf f • IV WI' Of 71IILA I. 1111! I. Yr••. alp•,• .• •N1 Y 1111,11 IN•• T 1114 �t - r�• M , w•wr 111• Y N•• . . I. marl•• . • I.O.M. 1.1. •. _n r 11.1 MI, .,1 Iw• secs warts/ us O. Ow �•1YI r. 10.0 w •1�,••Y w1� i,�I MYI• - ' .w ti p•rm . rleTr rYr w 1 rr•�iTAIB•Ii I�• �IIV`.w_ 1C.1 1•.r •�_,w•ir11tt11 ••••••• •• • I low •• •114 •I w • � - r •sa •r .rn :7110:) +• .��r nn I r r ...17•1 ".'"'" •• 1•+ :: I 1 11!. "01 •70• ••••••• Ir 111•01. 114 • .115,1••,» ;N -. - e ISSS IS , st ::ii • • L" •r• IwM Ill+ N rnn/ M pro. tl . _n. • •tl r W / ...... • ••w•• r W N. r •u IM le,. •• Mw I•I•�• :';111..,,, 1111• t,nl .....21•11 1 4r 1111 �.s rw n.�.••Iw� IM !Irl•.r� '' v •' •Yr•�.I ..,i•. !,\4.111: �4:...eYA r YYMII':1: i .. 11 AI14 •N VIr II ••'• IN1 /1� 11 • IN1/•r nuts •I.• 14,110••• .1 1114 INVr• II nce! w 1NVIr II 111141 •NVIr II In,.. 1"/"M".4110••• • 15.115• YY • II 1•114 •III 60430•08 II •I•• rr_• 1.11.0!• ,1 ws. • 1 1111 #1•14 1/1.0.4011 _n•• , woos. 111 551 •w a •1•r w .•r.•• M r •• • ••�I Y•. rr,;•ro r4 �� • 1 1•4 •54, •-- I•w•11••.•rr r,• „s •l •w ••. 11 Y I Yi •~c10• I Ow•ri.[�I•� rw r Wn oiw • ••∎w 11.11 rat w. 111114 r I••'-1 ,.1111 1r Ww•'1 • d r•.tl, Y M• • i M• 11.11, • w, 11.11!,• Y Iuw• W +1r • w, ti rim.• lasts, hail W N Y...NY; I 1•• 11.11 110 •• M IY 11 , - Paso. ww N NO SS I wl• MS a. • hart Y 1144 tr /VIVO r •• • •■• w•w_n IIr Y IS M I. • 1,11511 Iw nr. 114 WI., r ••• • I•i ni •'•r,14N 111.4 ., r T I Y O w' 1 • d 11 . U M 141 r 1IN 1 •r'• , � 111,1. 1.11 w. 01Z...: I •aw •o•n•. 1 .1.11 I• IS CST Y luw•. MST GP 1_. 11.11 . I•••••••• 1••401 r•Is 11.1 •••• a. ••.11 r 111.0) WnJ .•• m •w VS,. Y A N• Im.Y w ••••• •••., •r _, •• Ire• •111 1.1,11 511.0,. •• 0.1111 ••••••• 11_• •••100. 11N11 I. •t C. Iv 1•o•4. I w_. 11•11 • ww,pa. O•t/1 00.1.1-C. TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 •05.0.170+ •• •• 00C C -1 • ) . RICHARD ARAMBURU JEFFREY M. EUSTIS Attorneys at Law 505 Madison Street, Suite 209 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625 -9515 Fax: (206) 682 -1376 z September 6 2001 4- z re LU M _r O U 0 U) o Andy Taber J = OPUS Northwest, LLC ci 0 s C OPY co o 915 - 118 Avenue SE, Suite300 Bellevue WA .98005 5 co D a Re: Opus Park 5/405 ~ _ zF- I- o w This office represents Richard and Ginger Botham, the owners of Tax Lots 29 0 a nd 31 within Tract 4, Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts. These tax o 1 parcels abut to the north and the northeast property upon which your firm is = LU proposing construction of an office park. The proposed office park site 1- 1= includes Tax Lot 30 of Tract 4. w z U - Hi- 0 Dear Mr. Taber: As you are aware, Tax Lot 30 is traversed along its southerly boundary by a 25 -foot easement which is appurtenant to the Bothams' Tax Lot 31. Additionally, a 25 -foot easement traverses the southerly and easterly boundaries of lot 30 which is appurtenant to Bothams' Tax Lot 29. The topographic and boundary survey prepared by Goldsmith & Associates discloses these two easements. See sheet C -1. Your proposal designates the easement areas as parking spaces, aisles and related structures. These proposed improvements interfere with the Bothams' right for use of the easement for access. Even though the easements are not currently improved, permanent obstructions would interfere with the Bothams' rights to their use. There is continued interest in the development of the Botham property, for which the easements would be necessary. Moreover, your construction of permanent, legally required parking upon the easements would likely preclude the removal of parking stalls and structures in the future to allow for improvement of the access easement. Accordingly, the Bothams regard the proposed parking spaces, aisles and related structures as an interference z September 6, 2001 Page 2 with their easement rights which they are prepared to take legal action to prevent. The Bothams insist that permanent parking spaces and structures not be placed over their easements. If you propose alternative means to resolve this conflict, you may contact the Bothams through this office. By copy of this letter we are providing notice of this potential encroachment to the underlying property owners and to the City of Tukwila. Thank you for your attention to this matter. J M E /py cc: Richard and Virginia Botham Minnie Dhaliwall Sheila Burns Johann Polinger St:�t.Y..+�:wi•'Y.r b iZTAla.br..n z ~ w J0 00 � O J = I- U) LL w 0 u_j = w h = z F .. I— 0 ZI- w w 0o This is in response to the comments submitted by you regarding the Opus project at 14910 -5151 vo cn Avenue South, Tukwila. Thank you for providing comments related to this project. We have 0 F- reviewed your comments and concerns and the remainder of the letter addresses each of the = 0 items listed in your letter dated September 7, 2001. „ = o ..z — I 0 December 7, 2001 Richard & Virginia Botham 16334 Linden Avenue North Shoreline WA 98133 -5620 Re: Opus project at 14910 -51 Avenue South, Tukwila. File numbers LO1 -050, E01 -018. Dear Mr. & Ms. Botham: 1. Retaining Walls: The project has been revised to not include retaining walls. There will be no concrete or block retaining walls along the property line. Instead a mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) system using geo -grid fabric mats will be used to stabilize the slope of the fill at the property line. Attached is the information provided by applicant regarding such systems. Detailed review including structural review of the mechanically stabilized earth system will be performed during design review and building permit review. The applicant is not proposing to dig on or disturb any adjacent land at this time. However if they need to access any adjoining lots they shall be responsible for obtaining any such rights from the adjoining property owners. 2. Storm Drainage: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director At this time, this project is being reviewed for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Design Review. Building permits will be issued after the Design Review is complete. Only preliminary drainage review is done at the SEPA and Design Review stage. Actual engineered design is reviewed at the building permit stage. All surface water drainage design will meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design manual (KCSWDM) requirements. The storm drainage will be designed by a registered civil engineer. A complete report submitted by the developer's engineer will address the level of retention 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 z required. The report will contain a complete account of the drainage onto and off the site. The City's Public Works Department will be reviewing the proposed drainage design. I have passed on your comments and concerns to them. Their response is that at no time will the City knowingly approve a design which would cause water to backup onto another property and the City can honor your request to require a Level 2 detention only if the design and site conditions warrant that level of detention. The contact in Public f- z Works Department is Jill Mosqueda and you can reach her at 206 -433 -0179 for further ce 2 information and questions regarding drainage. _10 o 0 3. Bonds; w = J The City does not require bonds for any future anticipated failures. However the project w 0 must be built according to the approved drawings and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy a final inspection is done to verify that all conditions and requirements of the building permit have been satisfied. a = W = z� 1— 0 z 4. Parking: The project has been revised and applicant has submitted a revised site plan. Some of the layout and sizes of the stalls have been revised. The project will meet Tukwila Municipal Code requirements regarding number and size of parking stalls. 5. Easement: Along the south property line of tax lot number 7661600030, the site layout has been revised and the proposed south drive aisle to be used for access from 51 Avenue South has been aligned with the underlying easement. Additionally, along the east property line of the same lot, the parking has been removed from the easement area. Also, the proposed retaining wall is to be replaced by mechanically stabilized earth system. Perimeter landscaping is also proposed along the east property line as required by the City's zoning code. Applicant was asked to submit all recorded documents related to the easements in question since the title report did not include detailed information regarding the ingress /egress easements but only referenced a separate document (recording number 8701270486) in relation to the easement. The easement is actually recorded under a real estate contract (recording number #7306290088), which is referenced in the Statutory Warranty Deed (recording number 8701270486). Based on review of these documents and the revisions made to the site plan, the city will proceed with the approval of this project. If there is any other legal dispute regarding the easement issue please provide any additional documentation for our review. At this time we are in process of reviewing SEPA and Design Review applications and anticipate issuing SEPA determination in the near future. At the SEPA review stage only environmental impacts are analyzed. And any outstanding issues related to the easements (based on any new documentation submitted by you) will be addressed prior to the issuance of building permit. z Again thank you for providing comments on this application. I will also be calling you to see if you had any further questions or if you wanted to set up a meeting to review the revised information that was submitted by the applicant. You can also reach me by phone at 206 -431- 3685 or by email at mdhaliwal @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Sincerely, 1 144 / Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner C: Andy Taber, Opus NW Jeffrey M. Eustis Encl: Revised Site Plan Information regarding mechanically stabilized earth systems ..4•2V. . ,L,,;a.0.1.;:.. 4..,;.4 . .. :W g .111A4,111 . z z . ce U. 00 W I J 1 0) LL w O . � Q = W I z � F- 0 Z Lij 2 0 0 � . W W ` I 1- U W Z 0 = 0 ~ Z :� OPUS,. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O R S D E V E L O P E R S December 5, 2001 Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Minnie: The information about the existing north and south ditches and the relocated north ditch to the east edge of the property are identified in the enclosed Sconzo/Hallstrom drawing P1.01, Revision Number 6, dated 11/06/01. Sincerely, Opus .rthwest, L.L.C. ndy Sr. R anager DEC 0 6 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WuLi��rsaNWi� OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 - 453 -4100 Fax 425 - 453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com Re: Additional information for Opus Park 1 -5/405 project — File Nos. L01 -050 and E01 -018 This letter and its enclosures are in response to our phone conversation on November 20, 2001 for additional SEPA information. The landscaping plan for the entire site can be seen on the enclosed Site Studio drawing L -1, Revision Number 2, dated 12/03/01. This drawing lays the landscaping over the Sconzo drawing so all the information requested is on a single sheet. Two copies of these two sheets and Site Studio L -2 Revision Number 2, dated 12/03/01 are enclosed. In addition two copies of drawings P1.01 and L -1 have been reduced to 11 x 17 size and are enclosed for your use. I believe these drawings address the items in our conversation. Please call with any questions or if more information is needed. P:IREDEVITUKWILA COMMERCIAL\Correspondence\City Tukwila\Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 011205 .doc Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee •,Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. MEMORAiNDUMVI Wetland/Watercourse Background City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director z w 00 CO 0 CO W J = CD u_ w w? co = w zF. I— 0 w 0 V) Per your request, I have reviewed the recent submittal (9/28/01) for the Opus Northwest project — 0 t — Opus Park 5/405 located along the eastside of 51 Avenue S. The submittal includes a geotechnical = 0 report (Terra Associates, Inc. 9/21/00), an addendum letter to the original wetland report including „ o a watercourse mitigation report (A.J.Brederg, B & A Inc. 9/21/01 Letter and Attachments). In w z addition to the plan submittal for site design, there is a preliminary Landscape Plan. 0 O~ TO: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner Jack Pace, Planning Manager FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist bri DATE: November 20, 2001 RE: Opus Park 5/405 Office Building: Wetland/Watercourse Review (2°") - Permit #'s E01 -018 & L01 -051. Preliminary comments for SEPA review were sent to the applicant (Community Development Letter, 8/16/01). My technical review comments were sent in a Memo dated August 27, 2001. The following is specific to the current submittal but is focused on the review needed for SEPA Determination. The proposed mitigation will be reviewed for final plan approval after SEPA is issued. The following information is intended to document the sensitive area review necessary for SEPA. Initially, a project application for land altering included the project property and several additional parcels of land on both north and south sides of the current Opus Park site. Three separate wetland consultants are known to have worked on these sites during the past 4 years. The B & A, Inc. wetland delineation was questioned by staff after reviewing the limited wetland boundary and conservative approach to classifying the sensitive areas. Adolfson Associates, Inc. was contracted to perform a peer review of the wetland delineation report and wetland/watercourse areas on the entire project area bordering the I -5 corridor. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 i� ww;v.:iv�r �i�x�e.rta'xu�� d Sebes's�'�wf! z Opus Park Review Memo November 20, 2001 Paget z ;= z ce w The following are the reports / correspondence related to wetland and watercourse sensitive areas v p on the "site ". The "List of Reports" is not the total of file documents but is intended to include co o those that are relevant to the sensitive area issues and SEPA. As mentioned, the "site" initially W = inc luded the majority of land between the I -5 corridor and 51 Avenue S. from S. 151 Street north to approximately S. 146 Street. This land included several ownerships (8) and parcels (11). u j 0 List of Reports co w. 1.Planning Division Comments — Memo Re: Permit MI — 018, Opus Northwest (2/6/01, C. Lumb) 2.City of Tukwila Wetland Delineation Report by B & A Inc. (Bredberg & Associates, Inc.2 /15/01) • w 3.Correction Notice — Illegal Land Altering sent to landowners (City of Tukwila 3/2/01) o D- o 1— w — 4.Letter to Lisa Verner, Commercial Development Services from (Bredberg & Assoc., Inc. 3/14/01) 1-1-= • v L I 5.Planning Division Memo to Utilities Committee from (Jack Pace, Planning Manager 3/20/01) w U = O 6.Draft Peer Review for Property Located at S. 151 Street & 51 Avenue S. (Adolfson Associates, ~ z Inc. 4/5/01) 7.Opus Property Project Memo — Wetland/Watercourse Peer Review (DCD Schulz 4/16/01) 8.Peer Review for Property Located at S. 151 Street & 51 Avenue S. (Adolfson Associates, Inc. 4/25/01) 9.Letter to Steve Lancaster, DCD Director from Opus Northwest (A. Taber & B. Brynestad 5/10/01) 10.Letter to Andy Taber, Opus Northwest re: Mitigation Planting Plan from (Bredberg & Associates, Inc. 7/16/01) 11.Letter to Andy Taber, Opus Northwest re: Complete Application - DCD (Minnie Dhaliwal 8/16/01) 12.Opus Park Office Building Memo — Wetland / Watercourse Review (DCD Schulz 8/27/01) 13.Addendum to Wetland Report - Opus Park 5/405 (Bredberg & Associates, Inc. 9/21/01) i ,. yK•4;:fitivA'w!t..3 >:. ..1•SY� .i iJbM'iNp�r"M•.a.e.. ,.•wtr.+ai' . ... _. w.klR'9� •4.t�iiYS;1`•' Opus Park SEPA Memo November 20, 2001 Page 3 Several site visits were conducted with City staff, Adolfson Associates, and Bredberg Associates to cooperatively agree on revisions to wetland boundaries and ratings. As a result, the wetland/watercourse mapping was revised and accepted for permit review. However, the wetland delineation report by Bredberg & Associates, Inc 2/15/01 (Number 2 above) is not approved. The Adolfson Associates peer review (Number 8 above) recommended numerous revisions, additions, and clarifications to this wetland report. In addition, the Addendum to Wetland Report by Bredberg & Associates, Inc. 9/21/01 (Number 13 above) cannot be approved because it does not correct the original wetland report. Current Project Review The current project, Opus Park I- 5/405, consists of one building permit for a 65,600 square -foot office complex. The proposed project is located in the central portion of the original development site that was evaluated for the extent of wetland and watercourse areas. The project land contains two, Type 3 watercourses that flow from the west and a Type 2 watercourse segment along the east side within the WSDOT I -5 right -of -way. The related wetland areas are located off -site on both north and south sides with very little buffer extending onto the site. The northern watercourse is a maintained drainage channel with low riparian, habitat functions. This drainage is proposed for piping under the parking lot. Per TMC 18.45.080 D., mitigation is required for piping to replace the open channel and its functions. The mitigation concept involves creating a new channel along the east side of the site. It is assumed the proposed watercourse channel will convey the same natural flows and provide water quality improvement and a habitat benefit. The details of the watercourse mitigation plan will be finalized after the SEPA process is complete. The I -5 watercourse was inventoried and mapped by the City and rated a Type 2 (Watercourse # 23 -11). The Addendum (Bredberg & Associates, Inc.) provides re- evaluation of the segment that crosses the project site. City staff verified that the proposed rating change from Type 2 to Type 3 for this segment of the drainage is not warranted. Watercourse # 23 -11 remains rated as Type 2 with a standard buffer of 35 feet. This watercourse is adjacent to the project site and the buffer extends onto the project site. However, the proposed watercourse mitigation area can be allowed in the existing buffer as part of an enhancement plan. Most of this buffer area is dominated by Himalayan blackberry. At a minimum, the standard buffer setback of 15 feet will be required for the new Type 3 watercourse. .rc��: avS�%+Tf `n�.�r1u�Y �?s•Tdf:' t,, .x f Opus Park SEPA Memo November 20, 2001 Page 4 The following information will be labeled on the site plan: The I -5 right -of -way watercourse is a Type 2 with a 35 -foot buffer. The two watercourses on the site are Type 3 with 15 -foot buffers. The southern wetland, off -site, is a Type 2 with a 50 -foot buffer. The northern wetland, off -site, is a Type 3 with a 25 -foot buffer. The watercourse mitigation will be a Type 3 area with a 15 -foot buffer. Summary This memorandum is purposely written to document the sensitive area assessments and mapping for the project's SEPA Determination. There are no direct wetland impacts associated with the project. The Sensitive Areas Ordinance (TMC 18.45.080 D. 6.) allows for piping a Type 3 watercourse with adequate mitigation. If approved by the DCD Director, a watercourse segment of low functional value would be piped and fully replaced on the site as part of an approved mitigation plan. The watercourse mitigation has been approved as a concept. The details of a final mitigation plan will reviewed and completed after the SEPA determination. Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director o� OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O 1t S D E V E L O P E R S November 16, 2001 Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Response to October 26, 2001 Request for additional information for Opus Park 1 -5/405 project — File Nos. L01 -050 and E01 -018 Dear Minnie: RECEIVED NOV 16 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 - 453 -4100 Fax 425 -453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com This letter and its enclosures are in response to your letter of October 26, 2001 referenced above. Our comments below follow the numbering system in your letter seeking additional information. 1. Overall comments: a) Easements: 1) Copies of recording documents 6299225, 8701270486, 7306290088, 3234343, 867965 and a letter from Tmnsnation Title Insurance Company dated November 14, 2001 are enclosed. Documents 6299225 and 8701270486 are Statutory Warranty Deeds for previous sales on the property. Document 7306290088 is a Real Estate Contract for the property to the west of our north parking area. Document 3234343 is a real estate contract from 1942 for all of Tract Four, which includes our north parking area and the land to the north and east of our north parking area. There is a reference in it to a water right to a spring on another parcel. Document 867965 is a real estate contract from 1913 and makes reference to the same water right to a spring. Transnation's letter indicates that the water right is to a parcel beyond Tract Four. 2) The existing conditions of the easement area are slopes covered with blackberries. Access for ingress, egress and utility purposes would be difficult. The access from 51S Avenue South is very steep in the east/west direction and the same is true for the easement area running north/south along the east property line. Our site plan and structured fill greatly improve the easement areas for their intended purposes. The existing uneven and sloping area, when completed, will be level and clear of brush and trees for seventeen -feet. The next five feet will be landscaped and level. The remaining three -feet will be the face of the new slope. In the event the asphalt or landscaping is Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. where something needs to run, the asphalt or landscaping can be removed and replaced just like any existing surface material or landscaping would need to be removed and replaced. The three enclosed 8.5x11 sketches illustrate the easement area, the existing and future contours, and a cross section of the slope, landscape and asphalt surface area. We have discussed the relocating the easements with the neighbor to the north and east, the Bothams, but they were not interested in relocating them. b) The Type 2 permit application will be submitted as the next step after SEPA determination is issued. 2. SEPA comments: a) B.1.e. Site design alternatives: Several alternative concepts for placement of the building were considered such as turning the building ninety degrees, placing the building closer to 51 moving the building more to the east or north or south. Lowering the fill and increasing the slope from 51" into the parking area was considered, too. The main entry to the building needs to face 51s and be on the second or middle floor as this is the first all office floor. Parking needs to be near the front door. Dropping the west parking area would prevent us from having a front door at parking level and would make the area between the building and 51 to the west feel dark and canyon like. Therefore, both moving the building closer to 51 and lowering the parking level at the front door are unsatisfactory alternatives. Turning the building ninety - degrees places more of the building into the slope and eliminates much of the glass that is needed as an office building. This alternative would redistribute the fill from the west area to the north and south areas. However, we believe some of the fill between the west parking area and 51s Avenue North can eliminated. In response the City's Public Works request for a geo -tech report on the hydrological effects of soil loading on groundwater we have enclosed a report from Terra Associates dated November 8' 2001. There are no adverse hydrological effects of the soil loading on the groundwater. b) 7.a.2. The buried debris noted in the soil report was described as asphaltic concrete, concrete, and paint cans. There was no indication of contaminated soil. Historic and more recent aerial photographs of the area show the site as an open field. There is no indication of a gas station or other activity at this location to cause soil contamination. Prior to starting construction more sub surface investigation of this area will be conducted. In the unlikely event some contamination is discovered, tests will be conducted, the City and DOE informed, and appropriate action taken. Therefore, we request that SEPA determination be issued subject to Opus performing additional investigation and correcting any unacceptable condition prior to issuance of a building permit and starting construction. 4. Design Review Comments: a) Parking: The parking stalls have been revised and wheel stops added per code. The sidewalk adjacent to the building provides a minimum of four -feet clear walking area in front of the vehicle bumpers. The enclosed revised site plan dated 11/06/01 revision number 6, illustrates these revisions. b) Landscaping: P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COM MERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 011116 .doc Pg 2/3 The perimeter landscaping area along the north property line is now dimensioned to indicate an area of five feet or greater. This is in addition to any area required for the structured slope of the fill. The enclosed 8.5 x 11 inch sketch of a cross section for our structured slope referenced above illustrates this plan. The plant material along all the property lines will be similar to the Type I landscaping indicated along the south property line. b) Retaining walls: We have deleted the "lock block (Typ.)" retaining wall system or equal called for on sheet C -3 of the civil drawings. There will be no concrete retaining walls or lock - blocks along the property line. A Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) system using geogrid fabric mats will be used to stabilized the slope of the fill at the property line. A letter explaining this method more fully from our soils engineer, Terra Associates, Inc., dated November 9, 2001 is enclosed. The enclosed Stabilized Slope Cross Section sketch referenced above illustrates this slope technique. Also, enclosed are photographs of a MSE slope that is 70 feet high in Issaquah, Washington. The four enclosed photos illustrate the landscape area at the top of this existing slope and how grass and other plants grow on the slope creating a natural look. c) Building Design: We, too, like our buildings to have a prominent entrance. Our tenants like to have a front door. We believe our current overhang when properly painted and combined with appropriately painted panel areas at the entrance will create a prominent portal to our building. Sincer O s ► orthwest, L.L.C. dy a Sr. Real Enclos to Manager • ' ecorded documents 6299225, 8701270486, 7306290088, 3234343, 867965 and Transnation Title Company letter of November 14, 2001. • Letter about the mechanically stabilized slope from Terra Associates, Inc. dated November 9, 2001 • Five photographs of the stabilized slope in Issaquah, Washington. • Three 8.5x11 sketches illustrating the north parking lot easements, the existing and future contours and a cross section of a typical stabilized slope with the landscape, all dated 11/06/01. • Sconzo/Hallstrom drawing P1.01, Revision 6, dated 11/06/01. P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 011116 .doc Pg 3/3 Transnation TRANSNATION TITL.. INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29th Place 1 Bellevue, WA 98007 1 425451-7301 1 fax 425-558-3563 1 800-- ,41 -77 01 A t.WbAMfuGI CO.PANY November 14, 2001 Andy Tabor OPUS Northwest L.L.C.' 915 118 Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Transnation Title Commitment No. 870146 Burns Dear Mr. Tabor: Enclosed herein per your request are copies of documents recorded under Recording Nos. 3234343 and 867965. You had expressed a concern as to the impact of the water rights noted in the document under Recording No. 3234343 and how it affects the title to the real property under the above referenced commitment. The answer from a title perspective is that there is no impact. Neither document imposes any permanent encumbrance on the subject property. The document under Recording No. 3234343 sets forth a right to use water and maintain a pipeline over other property, the same as was reserved in the second document under Recording No. 867965. The right to the water and to maintain a pipeline are not shown on the title commitment as it covers property outside of Tract 4 of Seattle Land Company's Five -Acre Tracts, and as such, does not affect the subject real estate. If there are any additional questions on this matter, please feel free to, contact, the undersigned. Si m erely TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences REC E IJED 04 1 3 2001 °NS 1-LC November 9, 2001 Project No. T -4800 Mr. Andy Taber Opus Northwest, LLC 915 — 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Subject: Supplemental Geotechnical Review . Opus Park 5/405 Tukwila, Washington Reference: Geotechnical Report, Opus Park 5/405, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc., Project No. T -4800, dated September 21, 2001 Dear Mr. Taber: As requested, we have reviewed two issues regarding development of the site as they relate to geotechnical considerations. These include accommodating the grade transition adjacent to the property lines along the north and south sides of the site, and impacts to groundwater as a result of placing fill on the site to establish desired construction elevations. The following summarizes our comments and recommendations. Grade Transition As discussed in the referenced geotechnical report, grade transition along the property lines can be accomplished without constructing a retaining wall by stabilizing an over- steepened slope at the transition using reinforcing geogrids. This type of technology is commonly referred to as mechanically stabilized earth (MSE). A general detail of how a MSE slope would look in section along the property line is attached. The exposed over - steepened slope face can be readily vegetated using a turf reinforcement material, in combination with hydroseeding. Alternatively, plantings such as willow shoots could be installed between the reinforcing layers projecting out of the slope face during the MSE slope construction. Landscaping can also be readily accomplished along the top of the MSE slope. Please have your landscape architect coordinate with us in the unlikely event the placement of landscaping will require the penetration through any of the grid. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone 425) 821 - 7777 • Fax (425) 821 -4334 • terra@terra- associates.com �+ .... �`d,' .. . , ... ...�;m.i. :w . •,u,,;, _:..i.�,W�"��n��ytm.'.},,,a�i°° u' -': rc+.r?.:;�'�- �.'^'"^°`. ..........__... �.. ... • Mr. Andy Taber November 8, 2001 Groundwater As discussed in the referenced report, we observed groundwater seepage at a depth of approximately 11 feet below existing site grade along the proposed western building margin, and at a depth of 5 to 6 feet below existing site grade below the eastern parking lot area. These depths correspond to elevations of about 85 feet to the west and 83 feet to the east. The groundwater resides and flows through a medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel to gravelly sand unit that exhibits moderate permeability. Because of these characteristics, the stress imposed on the subsurface soils by the fill material that is required to achieve desired construction grades would not result in consolidation or an increase in pore water pressure. Therefore, placement of the fill would not cause an increase in the elevation of the current groundwater seepage. Also, no active springs or seeps would be sealed off or covered by fill placement. Therefore, a damming affect, which would cause the elevation of the groundwater to rise upgradeint of the fill, would not occur. Based on these considerations, it is our opinion that placement of the fill material on the site would have no affect on current groundwater seepage conditions or on adjacent properties. We trust this information is sufficient for you current needs. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call. Sincerel4,ypurs u TE 6clk US c Theodore J.,ce'li al &girl' A.ttachmeni .Z Stabilized Earth Slope Section cc: Mr. Bill Bieber, Opus Northwest, LLC Project No. T-4800 Page No. 2 G ( 5 /& - - Tv \c ). W A 1 To -. - —.- S 1'4. IA .�. — •. — _.. - .. Z i 4 i1 . tTy V Cry (Nti aolo Po,u t rr\ Mirti -' ex 'A PROJECT OQ,�S ` cA -`< s A o$' BY 17e. a_ S SHEET + I _, �..:;:. TERRA .e. ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants LOCATION CHECKED .,,.. t�::'� 1�.. CLIENT ��� l.V al,,,; D ATE 11 / t 12525 Willows Rd., Ste. 101 • Kirkland, WA 98034 • (425) 821 -7777 T LI800 JOB NO. G ( 5 /& - - Tv \c ). W A 1 To -. - —.- S 1'4. IA .�. — •. — _.. - .. Z i 4 i1 . tTy V Cry (Nti aolo Po,u t rr\ Mirti -' ex City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director z z �w J 0 U U J = N LL w ? w a I I-- Z I- 0 z i— w w . U O N CH w I U a) Title report for the Burns property references two easement documents, recording numbers �_ 6299225 and 8701270486. However only the second document was submitted and it further z references two documents- recording number 7306290088 and 3234343. Please submit all v i documents related to any easements on the subject site. p z October 26, 2001 Andy Taber 915 118 Ave SE Suite 300 Bellevue WA 98005 Re: Request for additional information for Opus Park I -5/405 project. File numbers L01 -050 and E01 -018. Dear Mr. Taber: Based on a review of your resubmittal for Design Review and SEPA, please address the following comments: 1. Overall comments: Also, retaining wall and required perimeter landscaping are shown within the easement area. From the documents reviewed so far it seems that 25 feet must be unencumbered for access and utility purposes. One option may be to record a new easement document to relocate the easement west of its current location. b) Please submit a Type 2 permit application (Special Permission Director) for the stream relocation and other buffer intrusions. 2. SEPA comments: Following are comments pertaining to corresponding item in the checklist: a) B.1.e. Additional information was requested regarding the proposed grade and fill to fully understand the impacts associated with 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Based on review of the site sections and geo- technical report it is not clear why this design that requires massive fill was selected. Please explain if any other site development alternatives were explored. As we discussed on the phone, one such alternative seems to be to construct a retaining wall along 51 Avenue South and do some 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 w b) 4. Design Review Comments: a) Parking: grading to meet 15% grade to get to the parking lot that would be lower than 51 Avenue South grade. Also, if it is determined that no other alternative is feasible, further analysis is required to address any environmental impact of the proposed fill on the subject site or adjoining properties. City's public works department has requested that the geo -tech report must provide an analysis of hydrological effects of soil loading on groundwater at surrounding properties and downstream 'A mile. Parking stall sizes are shown as 17'x9' (14'x8' for compact) with two feet overhang in the landscape area. However per TMC 18.56.040 (7)(e), wheel stops shall be required on the periphery of parking lots so cars will not protrude off the parking lot. Wheel stops shall be two feet from the end of the stall of head -in parking. Any landscaped area whether it is required perimeter landscaping or any additional landscaping may not be used to meet the minimum parking stall size requirement. Also, revise the parking stall sizes along the building front that are shown to extend into the walkway. b) Landscaping: b) Retaining walls: 7.a.2 The soil report states "The individual performing the environmental review should be informed about the fill, particularly the old paint cans. Environmental review will likely require some level of sampling and testing of the fill to determine if regulated hazardous materials are present." Further in your September 28, 2001, letter you have indicated that you are working with an environmental consultant to investigate the report of buried debris and they will review with Department of Ecology any findings that indicate regulated hazardous materials are present. Further information is required related to this issue prior to issuance of SEPA determination. Please inform us of the timing of the investigation and if it has been completed then forward us any findings. Also forward any correspondence with Department of Ecology. A revised landscape plan prepared by the licensed landscape architect, which shows all the plantings, must be submitted prior to Design Review. Construction drawings related to automatic irrigation sprinkler system may be submitted prior to issuance of construction permit. The perimeter landscaping along the north property line is dimensioned as "varies ". Five feet of Type I landscaping is required along the entire north and east property lines exclusive of the retaining wall width. Dimensions and calculations must be shown for the interior parking lot landscaping. Retaining walls over three feet in height are considered a structure pursuant to TMC 18.06.800, and thus must meet minimum setbacks of the underlying Office zone (front -25', 2 Other alternatives to site development that would avoid or reduce the amount of grade and fill must be explored in order to avoid the massive retaining walls. Depending on the analysis of your response to exploring other site development alternatives to reduce the amount of grade /fill and analysis of the environmental impact of large amount of fill, if it determined that retaining walls are inevitable then please provide details to show what steps will be taken to soften the impact of large blank retaining walls from the adjoining properties. Also, additional details related to structural design and drainage will be required prior to design review approval. side 10' and rear 10'). The current location of retaining walls does not meet this code requirement. c) Building Design: Sincerely, All of the comments related to building design were addressed as part of your resubmittal. However the overhang that was redesigned to highlight the entrance to the building does little to make the entrance more prominent. Instead of an just an overhang, it could be revised to include some vertical elements like columns, or redesigned like a portico, or other articulation added around the entrance area so that there is some relationship of the overhang to the ground level. 5. Public Works Building permit comments: a. Based on review of the traffic impact analysis report, City will require mitigation fee of $3,679 (61% of $6,030) for building A. A remainder of $2,351 shall be paid for building B with that building application, provided building B does not substantially change from current proposal. Late corners agreement is standard with this sort of improvement. b. A full drainage report and surface water drainage design per 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual shall be submitted with the building permit application. The report shall address the Sensitive Areas Ordinance when preparing the report. We are still in the process of reviewing your addendum to the wetland report and will have some additional comments regarding the wetland report and stream relocation and mitigation plan, which we will get to you by next week. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 206 -431- 3685. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner 3 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O It S D E V E L O P E R S October 10, 2001 Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re Opus Park 1 -5/405 project — File Nos. L01 -050 and E01 -018 Dear Minnie: Sincere Opus rthwest, L.L.C. Senior Rea to Manager c ir.T Q 2.iiQ1 r` ;.ir" 1J L',1t ,. � ' , t . 6' OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425- 453 -4100 Fax 425 -453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com Attached is the rendering of our new revised building elevations for the Opus Park 5/405 project. Also enclosed is the revised site plan indicating how we can accommodate the easement on the northern parcel on our site without impacting the development of the property. We submit these as additional information to the SEPA and Design Review package we gave you on September 28. Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. 6 OPUS THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T It A C T O It S I) E V 13 L O P E It S September 28, 2001 Dear Minnie: RECENE6 CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 2 8 20131 Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal PERMIT CENTER Associate Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukewila, WA 98188 OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 -453 -4100 Fax 425 -453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com Re: Response to August 16, 2001 Notice of Complete Application and Request for Additional Information for Opus Park I -5/405 project — File Nos. L01 -050 and E01-018 This letter and its enclosures are in response to your letter of August 16, 2001 referenced above. The sign was posted on August 27, 2001 and the signed Affidavit of Posing was delivered to your office on August 27, 2001. Our comments below follow the numbering system in your letter seeking additional information. 1. Current title reports for both tax lots are enclosed. 2. A complete geo- technical report dated September 21, 2001 is enclosed. 3. A Type 2 permit application (Special Permission Director) will be submitted for the tight lining of the north ditch/watercourse and a short extension of the culvert under 51' Avenue South to the south ditch/water course. The culvert under 51' Avenue South will be relocated slightly to the south. The water exiting this culvert will be enclosed in an extension of the culvert for a distance of approximately 40 -feet. The north ditch/water course begins where a second culvert crossing under 51" Avenue South discharges water in to a ditch that has been maintained as a drainage ditch over many years. Because this watercourse is where our parking is planned it will be place in a culvert under the parking. Mitigation for these culvert extensions will be through construction of a new watercourse along the east side of the development with appropriate enhancement plantings. A J Bredberg of B & A Inc. describes this work in his letter of September 21, 2001, copy attached. 4. A Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation application will be submitted. Please note this cannot become final until Opus purchases the two parcels. Issuance of a building permit will need to be contingent on recording the Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. 5. Use of the building: The proposed use of the building will conform to the requirements of Chapter 18.18 of the Tukwila Municipal Code. The first paragraph of the first page of Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. cover letter of February 22, 2001 accurately describes the office building as two floors of office (approximately 43,200 square feet) over one floor of high tech assembly space (approximately 21,600 square feet). We believe this is consistent with 18.18.020 (9) Permitted uses, that reads "(9) High -tech uses including research and development, light assembling, repair or storage of electronic equipment, instruments, or biotechnology with at least 35% office." Our percentage of office will be at least 35 %. The reference to "light industrial" use referenced in your letter is found in the traffic report when the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation document is referenced. The ITE document does not have a "high- tech" classification. Light industrial is the closest traffic category, therefore, this category was used for the report. It is only a convenience and does not describe the use of the building other than as a surrogate for high -tech and automobile trips. The reference in the SEPA Check List on page 14, paragraph 14.f to "light industrial" is a reference to the ITE document and not a direct reference to the code permitted use planned for the first floor of the building. 6. Sanitary sewer: We have met with Mike Cusick, Jill Masqueda, and Pat Brodin of the Tukwila Public Works Department. Based on their direction, our sanitary sewer line will be revised from crossing three lots to being placed in 51' Avenue South with a pump station, and then east in South 151 Street to the existing sewer line at 52 ° Avenue South. 7. SEPA comments: A.11 The building will provide workspace for general office technology type businesses. A typical tenant could be a technology company with a need for light assembly, repair, or storage of electronic equipment it sells as part of its business. This assembly, repair or storage would be on the first floor and the employees responsible for the marketing, sales, management, and accounting for the business operations would work on the second and third floors of the building. B.1.e. Cross sections indicating the existing grade and the final grade can be seen on sheet P4.03 and five sheets labeled Site Cross Sections by Terra Associates. Copies are attached. A discussion about fill procedures can be found in the enclosed Geothecnical Report dated September 21, 2001. Actual routing of trucks will be worked out with the City of Tukwila prior to issuance of a building permit. B.3.a 1 & 2 We will refer to the watercourses as "ditches/Type 3 streams. See B & A Inc. letter of September 21, 2001 for additional comments (Copy attached.). 7.a.2 A Applicant is working with its environmental consultant to investigate the report of buried debris. The environmental consultant will review with the Department of Ecology any findings that indicate regulated hazardous materials are present. 8.k It is noted that the City did not receive any formal application for this site until Opus made its submittal on July 19, 2001. 8. Design Review Comments: P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 010926 .doc Pg 2/4 1 a) Parking: Applicant's architect, Sconzo/Hallstrom has revised the drawings and responded in their letter of September 19, 2001. A copy is enclosed. b) Landscaping: Applicant's architect has reviewed and responded in their letter of September 19, 2001. A copy is enclosed. Construction drawings for the landscape will include the appropriate landscaping in the five -foot area along the north and east property lines. The drawings will also include an automatic irrigation sprinkler system. Sheet C -2 indicates the trees and the sensitive area buffers. The proposed project will eliminate most of the few trees outside of the sensitive area buffers on the two parcels. c) Building Design: Applicant's architect has reviewed and responded in their letter of September 19, 2001. A copy is enclosed. d) Lighting Plan: A preliminary lighting plan and specifications are enclosed. e) Signage: Applicant's architect has reviewed and responded in their letter of September 19, 2001. A copy is enclosed. 9. Public works Comments: a) Email from Cindy Dinghton dated 8/13/01: The first paragraph identifies a payment of $6,000 for a mitigation fee for both Buildings A and B in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (Traffic Report) . We are submitting on Building A only at this time. Building A represents 61% (85/140) of the PM Peak Hour trips. See Table 2 in the Traffic Report. Therefore, the mitigation for Building A should be $3,643, which is 61% of $6,000. The second paragraph identifies the intersection of S 154 Street and 52n Ave S for widening improvements. The Traffic Report indicates another development on 52 " South prepared an impact analysis that identified this intersection as needing improvements with the ultimate build out of nine nearby properties. We will prepare a cost estimate for the work, however, prior to making any improvements we request a late corners agreement with the City for reimbursement by future developments in the immediate area that impact this intersection. The design submittal should be a requirement for the issuance of a building permit and the completion of the improvement for occupancy of Building A. b) Underdrains in parking area: The enclosed Geotechnical Report dated September 21, 2001 on Page 10 states that the existing groundwater seepage is at elevations 83 to 85 feet and that the parking areas will be at elevations 92 feet to 110 feet, significantly above any groundwater seepage, therefore, underdrains in the parking area will not be necessary. c) Water quality treatment: Water quality treatment is per the City's code and contained within the vault. The treatment is more completely described in our civil engineer's "Level one Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Control Plan" by Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. dated July 2001. This was submitted with the original application on July 19, 2001. 10. Fire Department Comments: a) Four -inch fire line: The drawings show a new eight -inch water line to be installed in 5 ls` Avenue South and a 4 -inch line leading to the building. Our civil engineers will meet with the P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 010926 .doc Pg 3/4 City's Public Works and the City's Fire Department to determine the proper size for the fire line into the building. The final solution will be detailed on the building permit drawings. b) Fire hydrants: There are fire hydrants along 51' Avenue South. Our civil engineers will meet with the City's Fire Department to determine the proper placement of fire hydrants. The final solution will be detailed on the building permit drawings. Wetlands and stream relocation: Responses to your City of Tukwila FAX of August 28, 2001 and a memorandum from Gary Schulz to you dated August 27, 2001 are detailed in A J Bredberg's letter of September 21, 2001, copy attached. Easements on the Burns property: The City has received a letter dated September 6, 2001, from the attorney representing the Bothams, the owners of three parcels immediately to the north of our proposed project. The north parcel of our project, Tax Lot 30 of Tract 4, is traversed by a 25 -foot easement along its south and east sides for ingress and egress. We are having discussions with the owners representative to resolve this issue. Issuance of the building permit should be subject to the resolution of this item. A copy of the easement is attached. We believe these comments will assist you to better understand our plans and to bring them into compliance with your codes. Please call me with any questions or request for additional information. Sincerely, Opus Npthwest, L.L.C. Andy T Sr. Rea Enclos to Manager • Current Title reports for Pollinger and Burns parcels • Geotechnical Report, by Terra Associates, Inc. dated September 21, 2001 • Site Cross Sections by Terra Associates, sheets 1 through 5 • B & A Inc, letter of September 21, 2001 to Ms. Minnie Dhalwal from A. J. Bredberg • Revised drawings: P1.01, P4.01, P4.02, P4.03 from Sconzo/Hallstrom. • Preliminary Lighting Plan Sheet 1 of 1 and Preliminary Lighting Plan Specifications Sheets 1 and 2 • Sconzo/Hallstrom letter of September 19, 2001. • Easement documentation including a Deed with recording number 8701270486, and Safeco title report dated August 26, 1977, for Sheila Burns (owner of the burdened parcel). P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal SEPA Itr 010926 .doc Pg 4/4 rep September 21, 2001 C Dear Ms. Dhaliwal: Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard - Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: ADDENDUM TO WETLAND REPORT OPUS PARK 5/405 The wetland delineation report was prepared in February, 2001, and submitted to the City. The original wetland delineation report was for several parcels, including the current Opus Park 5/405 project. Whereas, the report addressed a larger project, it has been downscaled to the current project. This addendum deals with the issues relative to the current Opus Park 5/405 project, comments from the peer review by Adolphson and Associates, Inc. dated April 25, 2001, the letter to Andy Tabor dated August 16, 2001, the fax from the City of Tukwila to Andy Tabor dated August 28, 2001, and the City of Tukwila Memorandum from Gary Schultz dated August 27, 2001. Most of the issues in the letter from Adolphson and Associates, Inc. dated April 25, 2001, have been resolved in the field or are not pertinent to the northern properties comprising Opus Park 5/405. All of the issues in the Adolphson letter regarding the wetland delineation have been resolved in the field, agreed upon, surveyed and confirmed as accurate. The Adolphson review requests additional information on the ditches /streams. The following information addresses channel width, depth, and type and amount of vegetative cover for the ditches /streams. 3303 43rd St. NW • Gig Harbor, WA 98335, USA 3378LR/ajb /smh /9/2g31 858.7055 • Fax: 253.858.2534 • ba @harbornet.com Dhaliwal Page 2 The north ditch is approximately 1 to 2 feet wide and from 2 to 5 feet deep. The vegetation on the western portion of the ditch consists primarily of Himalayan blackberries with several poplar trees at the far northwest side of the ditch. The _ eastern end of the ditch is lined with red alder trees. The amount of vegetative cc w cover is heavy dominated by Himalayan blackberry, while the poplar and alder 6 t o rees cover short segments of the ditch. o o u) ° u) ELI The ditch south of the Opus Park 5/405 site has a ditch less than one foot wide J F- and in the non - excavated area is only a few inches deep, while the excavated o area is approximately 2 feet deep. The southern ditch is dominantly vegetated with Himalayan blackberry and salmonberry. g Q u)° c5 The functions and values of the wetlands are addressed as follows: _ z �. F- o Flood and Storm Water Z F- LU wetlands serve as storm water detention areas. Storm water from o Both the watershed is discharged into the wetlands where the dense vegetation o cn slows the flow providing a limited amount of detention. The southern wetland occupies a broad level plain allowing it to detain considerably ? v more water than the northern wetland. �- o Sediment Erosion Both wetlands are heavily vegetated and provide high value for the z removal of sediments and eroded materials prior to discharging water into the I -5 ditch /stream. Pollution Control The dense vegetation of both wetlands removes pollutants prior to discharging to the ditch /stream along 1 -5. The dense vegetation and detention time within the wetlands provides biofiltration. The upslope watershed feeding the wetlands is heavily urbanized with considerable runoff from streets and roofs, providing a source of pollutants to be removed. Wildlife The wildlife value for the wetlands is low as they are in the middle of an urban area. The southern wetland contains a forested canopy, but is too fragmented to provide much wildlife use. The low designation of wildlife on the southern wetland is subjective and this, being a forested wetland, 3378LR/ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Dhaliwal Page 3 could be considered to have high wildlife function. The northern wetland is primarily scrub /shrub and dominated by Himalayan blackberry, providing a z minimal amount of wildlife habitat. w re Fish There is no fish habitat directly related to the wetlands; however, the o o wetlands provide water quality benefits to downstream fish habitat areas. w i H Aquifer Recharge and Discharge w o The wetlands are neither aquifer recharge or discharge wetlands as they 2 do not contain hilislope seeps, nor do they have permeable sediments � allowing infiltration to support aquifer recharge. = a F w Z Education The wetlands have minimal education value as they are highly disturbed w o and vegetated with exotic species. 0 w Aesthetic �F- W m Li The southern wetland has high aesthetic value as it forested. The northern wetland has minimal aesthetic value as it is primarily a Himalayan o blackberry dominated wetland. Li.i z U� 1- _ o~ Cultural The wetlands have no evidence of cultural value. Biological Support The wetlands serve to export organic material to the 1 -5 ditch /stream which, in turn, discharges to down stream fisheries. The impact assessment on the wetlands of the project shows that there will be no direct impacts on the wetlands. All activities will be outside the designated buffer for each of the wetlands. The watercourse /ditch discourse has come to agreement that the ditches will be regulated as watercourses. It has been agreed upon that the north and south ditches for the Opus Park 5/405 project are rated as Category 3 watercourses. 3378LR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 z Dhaliwal Page 4 Discussion of the 1 -5 ditch /watercourse in the field with Adolphson staff came to the conclusion that the watercourse would rate a Category 3 rating. Please find the accompanying Watercourse Rating Sheet (Attachment 1) with a total score of 9 based on a site specific review of the Opus Park 5/405 site. The stream segment just south of the subject project area would rate a Category 2 watercourse based on the surrounding land use points that would be picked up as it is a forested category. The subject property has urban residential /maintained lawns while, in the wetland to the south, it would be a forested community and would score a total of 13 points. The following items per the letter dated August 16, 2001, are addressed per relevant portions. Item 3 addresses a Type 2 permit application and the need to address Section 18.45.080D of TMC for applicable Code criteria. The discussion addresses how the proposed project meets the Code criteria for work proposed in the sensitive areas or watercourses. Attachment 2 is the Mitigation Report for the activities in the watercourses. Item 7b.3.a.1 & 2 addresses that all three watercourses are determined to be Type 3 and regulated. The report by B &A, Inc. dated February 18, 2001, categorized the north and south ditch /watercourse as Type 3. It is only in review of the watercourse adjacent to Opus Park 5/405 and preparing a new rating form, site specific, that the ditch /watercourse adjacent to the subject project is also a Type 3 watercourse. The memo from Gary Schultz dated August 27, 2001, is addressed as follows: Item 1: The original wetland delineation report is revised in the form of this letter and the accompanying attachments to address the project and associated wetlands. The wetland delineation has been approved by City consultants, and a new determination on the ditch /watercourse paralleling 1 -5 is provided as Attachment 1. Mitigation for tightlining the north drainage and modifying the drainage on the southwest corner is presented in conceptual form as Attachment 2. Item 2: The project site plan labeling has been completed, showing the 1 -5 drainage ditch adjacent to the subject property as Type 3 with 15 -foot buffers. It should be noted that, immediately south of the subject property, the ditch /watercourse becomes a Type 2 as previously described. 3378LR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 ooviNv Dhaliwal Page 5 Item 3: Sheet C3 shows the north watercourse relative to the final grade and how it is necessary to tightline the ditch /watercourse. The existing outlet is at elevation 93, while the final grade will be elevation 112. There is a 9 -foot difference in elevation between the proposed final grade and the existing culvert outlet that feeds the north ditch. Midway through the north ditch where it outlets onto the property line between the site northeast of the subject property and the o subject property the final grade is at 102, while the elevation of the ditch is at 92, w i a n approximate 10 -foot differential. Based on examination of Sheet C3, it is not possible to maintain the existing ditch in its current location or configuration and w 0 yet provide a reasonable site for the proposed project. Item 4: Watercourse mitigation around the southeast corner of the property in "±"c5 the area planted with salal was initially proposed. However, elevation of the Z ILI outlets prevents placement of any water quality structures in this area. 1- o zr w The outlet for the storm water vault is at 82 feet. The tightline exits from underneath the parking lot at an elevation of approximately 87 feet. To provide a o N water quality structure for the discharge of the storm water control vault, there ° 1 = would have be an excavation of 5 feet just to reach the discharge elevation from uj the vault. This would put any water quality control structure below the elevation �- o of the ditch along 1 -5. There is not sufficient fall to put a water quality structure ui v) between the project and the I -5 ditch. 0 The outlet of the tightline of the existing northern ditch /watercourse is at elevation 85. The water flows through the approximate 1% grade to the southeast corner of the site where water discharges into the 1 -5 ditch. There is not enough fall to incorporate other water quality features, other than the seeded bioswale and the addition of rock check dams in the swale. Item 5: All desirable, existing, native vegetation in the new watercourse area will be retained if possible. Specifications on the landscape notes and in the mitigation plan will make provisions for this. The fax to Andy Tabor dated August 28, 2001, contains two issues. Number 1: A creek cross - section for the new creek and channel restoration and bank stabilization mitigation plan will be provided. 3378LR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Dhaliwal Page 6 Number 2: The Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife has been contacted to review the stream relocation proposal and determine whether a JARPA or HPA is needed. z Z . mow This concludes the comments from correspondence with the City and, in addition —J 0 to the accompanying attachments, provides a conceptual mitigation for the buffer " o restoration. w LLI J � If additional information is needed or there are any questions, please feel free to w o contact me. 2 w i d � z = I- O z F- 2 O �; O 1— w W: u" O . .. Z w U I O H Sincerely, A.J. Bredberg attachments +;;et• sz` ���� °s r's.r.; . ..,i:y „ts „y� ,; w,�, - .. .. c .. rt` n' �u�wi:` �i .� %; '�.s'�:iaC�iFal':+•:.:•� 3378LR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Z m > O H C • > cn m > • m z o cn m m -1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. CORRIDOR FEATURES Corridor Quality Figure 4 • 1 (,23e r c o t, rse_ Opus ...QR K . 'S /yo,s" Tukwila Watercourse Rating pg. 2 LEFT RIGHT BANK BANK Width of unmaintained vegetation from Mini >50 feet Score = 3 25 to 50 feet Score = 2 5 to 25 feet Score = 1 Vegetation diversity High diversity, Open forest or shrubs Single layer multi - layered with understory with minimal diversity Score = 3 Score = 2 Score = I Subscore Subscore 4,1 For each bank, multiply the subscores of the above two elements to determine total scores j.eft Bank }light Bank Subscore t Subscore Total Total Score 3 Score ' Corridor Barrier Function Dense forest or shrub 100 to 75% Score = 3 Dense forest or shrub 50 to 75% Score = 2 Dense forest or shrub 25 to 50% Score = Score Score Surrounding land use Immediately outside of corridor (multiply percentage of area in each catagory) Forested . Score = 3 Shrub or wunaintained Active agriculture grassland or pasture Score =2 Score = 1 urban: urban: residential/maintained lawns industrial /commercial Score= - Score = •2 Score _ Score _ Score c Score TOTAL CORRIDOR SCORE Add "A" for Enhancement Potential (Briefly describe) ADD INSTREAM ELEMENT TO DETERMINE TOTAL 1tEAC11 SCORE Score / 5 Score Score rP Score SCORE 7_ SCORE± Z • l z 6 _1 U O W z: J 1- ° 2 � rn a = Z = O ' Z tu n o. 0— Lu U '. I— LL O [Li U = O F- Z INSTREAM ELEMENTS Width of watercourse (O11WM) Channel capacity Channel stability Figure -I WATER t'OIIRSE U.\'FI FO - CITY OF TUKWILA >5 feet Score = 3 1 to 5 feet Score = 2 <I foot Score = Score eR Ample, no overbank Adequate, slight evidence Insufficient flows of overbank flows overbank flows common Score = 3 Score = 1 Score = 0 Score 3 No scour or downcutting Score = 3 Obvious scour or downcutting Score = -1 Slight scour or downcutting ( <25% of channel) Score = 1 Moderate scour or downcutting ( 25 to 50% of channel) Score = 0 Score I Date q' ( Fish use Salmonids present Score = 3 No fish present and little potential for restoration Score = 0 Potential for salmonid use Score = 2 No potential for salmonids but other species present Score = I Score x 2 = 0 Fish habitat Spawning, rearing, and Two of three habitat overwintering types present Score =3 Score = 2 Rearing or overwintering habitat present Score = l Score D TOTAL INSTREAM SCORE C. Watercourse # TS beler c o IdirSe 1 K; From 0 e ) P :- /,cps To S:�e Z Z W U (n om (n W. J H W 0 • a I W 1- = Z f -. 1- 0 Z 1— o U 0 I— W W I - U LI H. Z U = 0 1- 0 - n 0 C; 5_ > > cn > 2 -- $5 z > m M Z M DH • 0 N) O — I m NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEARIHAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. CITY OF TUKWILA • WATERCOURSE MITIGATION REPORT SITE: OPUS PARK 5/405 ENGINEER /SURVEYOR: HUGE G. GOLDSMITH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 1215 114TH AVENUE SE BELLEVUE, WA 98004 425 - 462 -1080 PHONE 425- 462 -7719 FAX PREPARED BY: B &A, INC. 3303 43RD STREET NW GIG HARBOR, WA 98335 253 - 858 -7055 PHONE 253 - 858 -2534 FAX ba @harbornet.com EMAIL BA #3378 SEPTEMBER 21, 2001 3303 43rd St. NW • Gig Harbor, WA 98335, USA 253.858.7055 • Fax: 253.858.2534 • ba @harbornet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 BASELINE INFORMATION 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS & OBJECTIVES 4.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 5.0 CONSTRUCTION PLAN 6.0 MONITORING 7.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN 8.0 PERFORMANCE SECURITY DEVICE 9.0 MITIGATION TIMING ATTACHMENT 1: COST ESTIMATE 1.0 INTRODUCTION Two watercourses will be rerouted. Discussions with the City to date indicate that this is acceptable. There are no salmon associated with the ditches or watercourses, nor is there any critical wildlife habitat. Mitigation plans have been prepared and are detailed on Sheets C -3, L -1, and L -2. Reduced copies of these sheets accompany. For detailed and to scale view, please see full size sheets. 2.0 BASELINE INFORMATION Two watercourses, one at the south and one midway through the north side of the project, will be rerouted. Both watercourses are Type 3. The south watercourse will have approximately 40 feet of its westerly end tightlined. The watercourse begins at a discharge from a culvert underneath 51st Avenue S. and flows in an approximately 2 -foot wide constructed ditch, then into a shallow channel where it eventually infiltrates into Wetland B. The southerly ditch /watercourse does not flow directly into the 1 -5 ditch but dissipates into the wetland. The ditch is approximately 2 feet wide and is a few inches to 2 feet deep. The vegetation is predominately Himalayan blackberry and salmonberry. The area where the ditch will be tightlined is not heavily vegetated. A restoration planting plan is provided for the area that will be tightlined up to the property line, including portions of the watercourse /ditch that will not be tightlined. The northerly ditch /watercourse will be tightlined its entire length. The current ditch is approximately 1 to 2 feet wide and from 2 to 5 feet deep. The ditch is vegetated along its eastern end with red alder trees, and the western end of the north side has poplar trees. The majority of the remaining vegetation consists of Himalayan blackberry. The ditch begins at the discharge from a culvert under 51st Avenue S. and flows in the constructed channel, east and into to the 1 -5 ditch. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS The purpose of the mitigation measures are to replace the functions resulting from the tightlining of the watercourses. A new watercourse will be constructed and enhancement plantings made along its entire length. In addition, enhancement plantings will be made along the existing ditch at the southwest corner of the property that will be unimpacted by the tightlining. 3378MR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 1 StX %N4.ti4UR�WW T1i�S/dl1RP�t1FOk+kvNnM xw rnvs.wwwnYC +wN.KV o2e_tiA PA}atC s`is:l lfYHt f Y!4� ;Y awi Lw{U n" —___ — __.- _.__._.___. __ _.... mfr ..,.: .. .........o_ ,....._...,.,�..__...... �. ,........�,... .._..,.. ..,_ <wy .- ...11 The site selection for the mitigation area is driven by the topography of the site. The site has been selected for mitigation on the eastern edge of the development, paralleling the 1 -5 ditch. The site is selected as it has the proper slope and is long enough to accommodate the replacement i watercourse. , z ce w m There are no direct target evaluation species as the watercourses have _1 o minimal habitat. The resource functions targeted with the replacements co W have to do with water quality and the creation of habitat associated with J i enhancement of the watercourses. co u- w 2 4.0 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS a co The performance standards for success of the project will be based on the ? w successful creation of a watercourse. Additional standards will call for 80% z survival of the plantings. Additional standards are per TMC as listed on z o page 18 -76 Section 18.45.080d2(3). 2 j U� CD 4.1.0 There will be improvements of the stream channel dimensions as the a gradient will be decreased. Currently, the streams are on a slope i w such that there is down- cutting and erosion. The replacement 1- watercourse will be on a 1% grade, with check dams to prevent any w z erosion. U co ol 4.1.2 Bank and buffer configuration will be provided in an enhanced state over the original watercourse. A detailed planting plan (Sheet L -1) details the plantings. 4.1.3 The channel bank and buffer areas shall be replanted with native vegetation which will be an improvement over the original species, sizes, and densities. 4.1.4 The stream channel bed will be better than the original stream. The original streams have unvegetated stream bottoms. The new stream will be hydroseeded and vegetated. 4.1.5 Fish and wildlife habitats will be enhanced over the original conditions. Currently, there is minimal vegetative habitat for wildlife, while the restored watercourse will be vegetated with enhancement plantings. 3378MR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 2 z 4.1.6 Relocation of the watercourse will not extend any sensitive area or its buffer off the subject property onto any adjacent property. 5.0 DETAILED CONSTRUCTION PLAN Detailed construction plans are provided on Sheets C -3, L -1, and L -2. Construction of the watercourse will be concurrent with construction of the project. 5.1 PROTECTION OF SITE Locate all existing and new underground utility lines prior to any construction. 3378MR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Save and protect existing trees designated to remain. Repair any damage done to curbing, sidewalks, fences, and any other damage caused as a result of this contract. 5.2. SUBGRADE PREPARATION Remove from site all invasive weeds (i.e. grasses, blackberry, Scot's broom) and rocks /debris larger than 1 inch size from planting areas prior to placing topsoil and as uncovered during tilling and planting. Till all planting areas to a depth of 6 inches prior to placement of topsoil unless otherwise noted on plan(s). Save and protect all existing willow and native vegetation at stream restoration areas. 5.3 TOPSOIL Imported topsoil shall be a prepared two -way or winter mix topsoil from .an approved commercial supplier. Provide 3 -inch minimum depth in all lawn areas. Provide 10 -inch minimum depth in all shrub beds and 6 -inch minimum depth in ground cover areas. Provide imported topsoil to depth only in planting areas outside of any existing trees designated to remain. 3 Pocket plant shrubs and ground cover with topsoil backfill in planting areas that occur within driplines of existing trees. 5.4 MULCH Provide 2 -inch depth, medium Douglas fir bark mulch in all shrub and z ground cover areas. i z � w 5.5 GRADING 6 Landscape contractor to be responsible for maintaining finish grading 0 o in all planting areas as indicated on plans, in typical details and J = cross - sections and as discussed during preconstruction meetings. N u_ in Verify provision of rough grade by general contractor or owner to plus /minus one -tenth foot. a N a = w Notify owner's representative of any discrepancy or potential surface Z = or subgrade drainage problems prior to starting work. z o w For turf areas, finish surfaces by raking smooth and even, lightly D o compact with roller, level out surface undulations and irregularities. o D- ww 5.6 PLANT MATERIALS P All plants shall conform to Code of Standards set forth in the latest " edition of American Society for Nursery Stock. z - I 0 All deciduous trees with single trunks to be size and variety specified z in plant legend; straight trunked, symmetrically branched, with lower branches pruned for head clearance. 3378MR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 All evergreen trees to be size and variety specified in plant legend with full symmetrical branching low to the ground. All plant material to be nursery grown and purchased by contractor to match within each variety in size, quality and character as indicated in plant legend (see Size and Remarks). All ground cover plantings to be triangularly spaced on center as indicated in plant legend throughout designated planting areas to dripline of low branching shrubs and evergreen trees. Plant material not matching these requirements shall be rejected. 4 5.7 FERTILIZER Fertilize all plant material with 71 gram Agriform tablets. Provide four (4) tablets per tree, two (2) per shrub, and one (1) per ground cover. Place tablets around root ball after backfilling by 50% for tree, shrub, and ground cover plantings. For turf applications, apply 16 -24 -16 starter fertilizer at the rate of 10 pounds per 1000 square feet. Apply dolomite limestone at the rate of 30 pounds per 1000 square feet, rake to incorporate. 5.8 SOIL POLYMER Provide Soil Moist, or approved alternate. Provide three (3) ounces per caliper inch of tree trunk diameter. Provide one (1) ounce per shrub and one -half (1%2) ounce per ground cover. Add soil polymer to backfill mix of trees, shrubs and ground cover. For turf applications, distribute at the rate of six (6) pounds per 1000 square feet. Broadcast with a drop spreader and ensure even disbursement. Till polymer into soil to a minimum depth of four (4) inches. 5.9 STAKING AND GUYING See typical planting details. 5.10 SOD Sod lawn shall be JB instant lawn, Country Green Farms, or approved alternate. 3378MR /ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Sod shall be cut within 24 hours of installation on site. 5 3 ■,2 �;ul4rn:uybya; -.g :rtiq 5.11. HYDROSEED Provide one application to the designated area(s) of the Landscape z Plan at the following rates of slurry: • z r Ce w 2 Seed (see plant legend for seed mix and application rate). _ o U) C Fertilizer: 10 -10 -20 with urea form FTE at 40 pounds per acre. J = Hydromulch: Silve -Fibre by Weyerhaeuser (or equal) at 1,600 111 0 pounds per acre. LLa Lime: to achieve pH between 5 and 7 y W Z = Water: 5,000 gallons per acre. z o w W Tackifier: 40 pounds per acre on slopes greater than 40 %. D o 0 5.12 IRRIGATION = W All planting areas shall be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system. • P — o z Irrigation system shall include double -check per jurisdictional L cn requirements and inspection, sch. 40 main lines and class 200 0 -1 laterals trenched to a 12 -inch minimum depth. z 3378MR/ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Provide Rain Bird 1812 series heads and nozzles and Rain Bird DVF or PGA series automatic remote control valves. Controller to be Irritrol Total Control series with two free zones above the system requirements for future expansion. Controller shall be located and mounted per owner approval. Irrigation system shall have complete head -to -head coverage with separate zones for north, south, east and west exposure, as well as lawn and shrub /ground cover areas. Nozzles shall be adjusted to provide optimal coverage with minimum overspray. Irrigation system shall have automatic rain shut off. 6 r 3378MR/ajb /smh /9/21 /01 Irrigation system bid shall include first year winterization by compressed air blow -out and spring start -up. Irrigation contractor to provide as -built drawing showing locations of all main lines, laterals, valves and indication of zones. z Irrigation contractor to provide one -year warranty against defects in z materials and workmanship. � ¢¢ JU 0 5.13 MAINTENANCE u Landscape Contractor to maintain all planting areas until final u acceptance of the job by owner. o w 2 During this period, all damaged, dead, diseased, dying, or broken a plant materials shall be replaced immediately by the landscape cn a contractor at no additional cost to the owner. ? w z � Site shall be maintained during landscape construction to keep site ° clean of excess soil or excavation on paved areas. ? Landscape contractor to coordinate with Best Management Practices o r= (BMPs) of the jurisdiction of the site. _ u L 5.14 WARRANTY z Landscape contractor shall warrant the purchaser that all new and 0 restored lawns and new nursery stock plant materials such as shrubs, trees, flowers and ground cover shall, at the time of installation, be free from defects due to disease or damage caused by mishandling or improper planting. Warranty shall be for a period of ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF FINAL ACCEPTANCE. The landscape contractor shall have the right, at its own expense, to test the item to determine the cause of a defective or damaged condition. 5.15 CLEAN UP Prior to final acceptance and payment, landscape contractor shall remove from site all trash and debris caused as a result of this contract and shall pressure wash or wet broom all soil from pavement. 7 '•.i✓t, *i... .'i;a «1'tir`1,r"12G..A;Eit s'} ' .1t .�4�^'f1Rre;V:- sj�5�. 6.0 MONITORING The site will be monitored for three years to confirm 80% survival of the plantings. Two fifty -foot transects along the constructed watercourse will be shown on the first monitoring report. The sampling transect will be 50 z feet long by the width of the buffer, which is approximately 30 feet plus the = w width of the ditch. The monitoring will take place for three years and cc submitted annually to the City by November 15. The monitoring reports will -I 0 document survivability of the vegetation and condition of the segment,of the u, o watercourse. w 2 7.0 CONTINGENCY PLAN w o g Q Should the project not meet the performance standards during monitoring, �, D the City will be notified within two weeks of the problem and remedial I w Ui actions taken. Should it be observed that the performance standards are z ~ not being met, the reason for lack of success will be determined and z o remedial actions taken. t U� The only likely problems anticipated is a lack of survival of the plantings. o This could be due to insufficient watering, disease, insects and /or theft. If = uj lack of watering causes loss *of plant materials, a supplemental irrigation s- will be needed. Disease, insects or other pests or the presence of invasive w z weeds would need to be controlled. Theft would call for the replacement of U _ . the plantings. z l-- Should the grass in the ditch not survive or the watercourse show signs of erosion or other negative attributes, additional check dams or seeding may be required. 8.0 PERFORMANCE SECURITY DEVICE The landscape architect has prepared a total of $9,575.49 for plant materials and installation (Attachment 1). The cost estimate includes all site materials and grading. 3378MR/ajb /smh /9/21 /01 8 The costs of monitoring, including the As- Built, are as follows: TABLE 1: As -Built $ 300 Monitoring Year One $ 300 Year Two $ 300 Year Three $ 300 TOTAL $1,200 The cost of monitoring is $1,200 for the project for a three -year period. The $1,200 can be added to the $9,575.49 for a total of $10,775.49 for plantings, installations and monitoring of the project. A bond or other performance or security device will be calculated based on this cost estimate at a percentage per City requirements. 9.0 MITIGATION TIMING The installation of the new watercourse will be during the early part of the construction of the project, prior to tightlining the existing ditch. 3378MR/ajb /smh /9/21 /01 9 — c. —z —Q 5D 00 X1o r. la ¢0 5UIk LAO AWAA' L114I5 COM1LD f.OY .LD.IO MCM.2015 Vella oo. '�• . MI J ` � fxs Ilugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surmayors • Planners 1115 NM 5..DD. SI S.U.ID., TA 50004 0.0. 5.. ISIS TTL• 125 lee -1050 MINIM TA 05005 r1L• 125 152 -TTIT H IGHWAY NO.I 15.R. 51 ........._ - - --- ,T ST ATE PRIMARY — r — � —_: ::'7.::--- ,___ — / µ - numumniff ''' ‘Y• 0 . AMIIMMIlln, \ .... 1111* ai ® vi: sr� ®�al�s re :- s•rrw.. A1300 dwron• Oesra fe.r. , ir atramr. r 05-• 1 reM. 000r r.r,•,. r..n�il, CITY Of TUKIILA • OPUS N W. LL.C. PRELIMINARY GRADING. PAVING, a DRAINAGE PLAN FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 WASHINGTON + 0002 C -3 Z W iY 2 00 N LLI J = w g 2 d I-W Z = I- 0 Z I- LL! W 0 0 - 0 - W W E- .2E = 0 0 I z O Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. CoosGliing Eotioeers• S1rveyorr Plaoleu 111111NIA It 1,IH,.,, rA 7.0.1.1M 1,IN,,,, MA TIL: 111 .111 TAI: II1 111111.111 11 WAY w....,,. wa.,..y ".ilr ,,1.11`,•. "n { �i\ 1 ;y^`Ff°�'F'4,t:. ;�, ° ` - r:J'Y:" ..,.ri: • MOWYM oeaw 1 A - I Ap �� 6r4�1�A:7;1- ILI tit ig ... � •�� � /•` o�G %� a A01pY,p °ep y 1 [ c / " CO r �.� �o:G,'° G p. •� I '7 , �.�� • �:.t:: .'�; �� n ttl. ,•�\ 1���P� ,� V Y � �. � c • • t ,v, .:.� •.:. ��]yO • .. �' .�...'.t' •° c e•' \ Mo, PLUMY May MIMN .111 wMV°/, ,Ty WIRY MN. 1. RING COUNTY OPUS N.M. L.L.C. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OPUS N.W. L.L.0 WA/ me WASH INOTDI a 71„1"1'.} ICS 10 '. .fivnn mere mwmmri uitt.vo e• L -1 Z ~ W J 00 CO ❑ u) W W H W LL Q Z W O • W U ❑ W I— W Z O - F— _ 0 Z O COMMe7115 Tia:! 1 DETAIL Ma DUO oeccuoutt nee r.L..v.r. r .4. MAIL NIB SUMS SUMS • M 1...10 MAW WM pp��h� RM. WM 111 1.001.0.0.0001 •'O^0 00.-010. 4014110 :K� "foe r 11.,.1 crow aAaw>_ WM II.. tvraL..SeLL L4NDWAPQ GINIDRAL NOTHS 1 ▪ epOn,loC FIQARAT.I _ Rim. rwwY l u l • 15 ' 6 .yd. I l � u ,�p V lao � .m 64 w( db Y n .oM e. 1Y`'poWlrw�pNµ Att pb4�cr�. ..p.aWr N�.iu�ielclti�.�}'1�. pMrV 1' ww.w °= Y ^ i I b rw l ...\ /err 1 li ee' Ilw I Rwd• - 'ra ., I.g W ter. 1bdN 4 tr. W.= p 1• a1.41 wdwdu. l , M wade w •I dna, a d pwdemr ORWltl iun.ti p.. ,1 =:: •df..1 .. I d.r a �� y Mexrda ♦.Mf 1p1.�) 7.r71.�w Ki w ` Yg.y °SA An rW Cn mJ,:.. '" w " Pa• N OYn• er1 evl.1 Y wd. M xwdad. .•l bN w /.• Mil dn. a Are, beset ...en AA t y.ww. R =y M e • .it biwrrvat1... =led .pWbyre( welt. 4 mrn dam l car dal v..1.. U • pW Lg.d..l.N yrrutb.. g b• AK bbr e.d a.evBA roaudw Pti" ip.d ns r...• .pwa.a. dal b mad. wwl•pr'ppl�.11e ti py 16./74.116,...+G.'•"rA p'd 7 144 /ppydx.. � Sr....w. � MVf ra...W.a.11it M.. Wa iur..ie1u I leee xp n d a w atop f I?Ae)a.Y0 rill' W •r lj p.ulpW ry — n I. C...y d.a I.... a .pp..•.d .I...,w W .1 1.• .1 .da 14 a = . 040.10 . M •ir"pi.�a...�W�Mx or Am, E .2i w . M r e lag I Y le •, 0.1 UN b. p. .aa T.d.1i. AAO b w .bpr p..lda *on bl. a rw. r Y , a b. .;...1 .1 .,w.,e1. red rim ;410 .4 FI(.6:.:w1•a.. 1. pd;6 : b. tr... ' � ..I... Y.ln•. ao1r.m lad ad r41. wOae ww • M C.V me a... . nal 9 evd i ± r a d m . A y . d u ,.• w r r. .. M. yr all d ca � v . . p p . . yl w lw M .II • ,,,-" beetroot doe. ..1 � Y.Wa V. a a.n.w .W no. Wad •I 1WIIrf1a t- a' a . g J.Tlr 1 - *� Ali Ira•1•'oM1• N ea ai 14 =NIP p�.�y. �d,aAw yr " ur pl w all t L w4r wd....:41 M.p••I •d. and dd . PLANT LEGEND ante>n. Plait HAM • • O- ee stmv.11w..b re ea I Plano Cwpe' IIdwT.l.d M• MbW tM. bed Wan 'The cabs wao 'l �ca p t7 ala art. "T p E Ma l P11 NV a oe neitialDal. MI! Al, Ia1fARKIS Ic'w.. °Atat. 1.., Mgt M Y C Wn.pw =wad 11•OG'u• MAGA l I yp°w �� M I M1A. Ir=takrpar Go. 0 Hugh 0. Galbraith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers• Surveyors • Pinner' 1111111110 e1 1,11.,.,. 1 1.0. )ll )111 11111,...114 81.:(1111411.1114 Von:(111) 111.1711 BAIT vadat k1. r 1 w..... r l^+'r1M 11103.11 R aab MAIM MT •,IBAm. 410,.•1 111 N . OPUS N.Y. L.L.C. K ING COUNTY PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OPUS N.W. L•L.0 WASHINGTON wn L -2 az: Z. riy., w iV.:2Y1..E: u ✓uir:.gYA.+rtASAA T- s Z W J U UO (0 CI J = F- 0) LL. W 2 • Q _ CI � Z = F- I -0 L I- LLS ID U � '^^ • V/ O H W 1 1 1 = W lLl 0 Z _ �.t fhS' r2i1.Y.�s ?:!n ^.:.�......._...'. ��a`::. _.�._...�. ✓.s.... ... i:'t i ". / 0 -I CD -1 D m0 �m D m NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Cost Estimate Landscape Architecture EnvironmentaL Services P425.788.8326 F425.671.0647 PROJECT @SITE- STIDIO.COM 5t1/1 gt7��' WWW.SITE- STUDIO.COM PO BOX 1542 DUVALL. WA 98019 Architect's Estimate of Installed Costs For: OPUS NW LLC 5/405 ESA Restoration SITE MATERIALS Quantity Unit Price Per Unit Price Per Quantity Hydroseed 2,600 CY 0.12 312.00 Topsoil 80 CY 24.00 1,920.00 Bark Mulch 30 CY 28.00 840.00 Rough and Fine Grading 4,200 SF 0.18 756.00 PLANT MATERIAL TOTALS (see attached summary) Trees Shrubs and Groudcover Estimate Subtotal WSST 8.8% Date: 09/21/01 Job #: OPUS 5/405 By: JW Subtotal 3,516.00 Subtotal Price Per Quantity 999.00 4,286.00 5,285.00 8,801.00 774.49 ESTIMATE TOTAL 9,575.49 Lq:i;.t,,i +l is ^S' 2ti'i!.�:c'__� .`2 i_ t:. °.:::.:Si tIS:SGn•1. PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED COST ESTIMATE OPUS NW LLC Date: 09/21/01 5/405 ESA Restoration Trees Western Red Cedar Douglas Fir Streambank Willow Shrubs and Groundcover Red Osier Dogwood 18" BR Oregon Grape 5 G. Pacific Wax Myrtle 5 G. Nootka Rose 18" BR Salal 1 G. Size Quantity Unit Price Per Unit Price Per Quantity 6' Ht. 15 EA 45.00 675.00 6' Ht. 3 EA 40.00 120.00 3 -4' BR 34 EA 6.00 204.00 Subtotal 999.00 105 EA 4.00 420.00 28 EA 25.00 700.00 27 EA 30.00 810.00 14 EA 4.00 56.00 460 EA 5.00 2,300.00 Subtotal 4,286.00 Total 5,285.00 6 rv, CITY O F U KKWILA SEP 2 8 tUU1 • PERMIT CENTER, GEOTECHNICAL. REPORT Terra Associates, Inc. Opus Park 5/405 Tukwila, Washington Project No. T -4800 Prepared for: Opus Northwest, . LLC Bellevue, Washington September 21, 2001 : = L" ; "s `...`. ".:Li. � • . 8701270486 Pioneer Natiotal Titlt karate f;oropy WASHINGTON T1TLt DIVISION Filed for Record a' Request of FI for Remo at Request 81 O TO I�`1a•r. ti n((i�n lQ 3 i...:r�Ae -r• 1`IV IY ctTTl-F LLB A E5 '' cT F:1 33 co the following deecrked real estate, slowed le the Canary of Washiestee: King R l4. v4 r TreS VAC( r rr.}D I It :CO "):r •• •c,t oY; • 1 Statutory Warranty Deed .*A;uS Ikt PAID ON Ct;:; r.A,Tk :F• • • .).• WO CO. RECORT :.rt 0 'l1 rt ln m 87/01/27 ":4 - ... THE GRANTOR Ralph A. Engle and Flora A. Engle, his wife, RECD F ;S. 00 C3 . �` G tr CASH SL Z � " .• __for • • cos ide oboe of 10.00 and other r ft c $ good and valuable consideration c.:-.E.: 1e hand paid, sad Rrrlmta to Terrill J. Forcier, a single woman, That portion of Tract 4, of Seattle Land Company's S Acre Tract, according to plat thereof recorded under volume 6 of plats, page 90,• records of King County, Washington, described as follows: • Beginning at the intersection of the south line of said Tract 4, with the westerly line of Primary State tfighway No. 1; thence westerly along said southerly line 150 feet; thence :, ortherly parallel with the west line of said Tract 4, a distance of 199.25 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing northerly along said parallel line 20.00 feet; thence westerly parallel with the souther :y line of said Tract 4, a distance of 40 fret; th '.nce northerly parallel with the westerly line of said ;tract 4 to the north line of said Tract 4; thence westerly along said north line •to the northwest corner of said Tract 4; thence southerly along the west line of said Tract 4•a- distance of 149 feet; thence east- erly to the true point of beginning. TOGETHER WITIa'a easement for, egreeo a-1 utility purpoaee • - .rover the Southerly 25 feet and the Easterly 25 feet of the follovi described parcel: j Beginning. at the intereeetitia of. that south line of said Tract 4 with the wecterly line of P :isary State Bighw y No. 1; thence wantonly '•'• ralang seid•aoutherly line'• 150�•fent to the true point of beginning' •• • ;,• of thie parcel; thence Northerly parallel with the went lino of said Tract 4 a distance of 199.25 feet; thence Westerly to a point on the .;.....• Westerly line of. said Tract 4 ;witich. ill 14S• south. of the Northwest • i • ` :`"-.''eoraer•eif said Tract 1 +; thexwti;Satitherly along the westerly lieuof • • ,a r tbe.Southweat said Tract 4; thence Eat:tarly • ' • : s ' . g' the' S outberly, line ;of: eaid'.; 4 to the true point or. begiiutirg ' ;' • z ~ Z W re —I U 00 (/) fa i = LL W 0 = W F- Z t— Z I- W W U � O — O l— W I t— - Z Li — I H � 0 Z • Sub ject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. een the parties herr • This deed is given !n' [ntf11b/eent or that 73 alnreal rondltSoaed for the coore7ance of the above •C• dated Jtose 13 N described propertr.and the covenants y, tnroetth owarranty nder the purchaser in said t e n ti F CV Interest or encembrance arising bY. d or becoming due subsequent - • app's to an7 taws. assess .• . ents or other cbar[ee levied. •• 0 to the date of said contract. ' C: June 28,1973 i .. tea1•tstate Excisa'Tax Ws' P aid an this s ale er sr:a!Iped esuupt ca • ... •day June • 1973 Dared this ' 14th' • •.' • .. is • SPATE OF WASH1NCT .. it :....a:.: .: , i A.fi«: : a :.a...3' - „•= n r• ..... .„. Oa d+Ip b eiwe me 'y ' tlt 1pk7A: iYd Fiora A. ling .� r �, • �rbo executed the witkln an ..: d .1, forego ,..,; ' laa ir�l }tr : arid % esecat � • ` ... known to be tbo ii.tlividad s desu! ....,...,,,,g .• . ; k y ; �, t tnt c . r ; • tre a nd dwry a nt tr• • yy, E% e %? the NaN.is. T` .W % '. • O�G i _L+'i ' :: :.. r • S • Rec. „ E224967 • • • • • r • 7700260896 Filed for Record at Request of AFTER RELCRDING MAIL TO: NAME h` thwest : • CITY AND STATE AUG2G1977 THE GRANTOR STEVEN C. MCDANIEL, and luny Jo >:t: IARIEL, husband and vale for and on consideration d TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AN VALUABLE CONS IDERATIO;, in hand paid, conveys and warrants so SHEILA J. BURNS, an urun r - Led woman 3ne following descrwed real estate. Ittualed rn the County of King Washington: That portion of Tract 4 of Seattle Land Company's 5 •cre Tract, according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 90, in Ki:::; County, Washington, d•:acribed as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the south line of line of primary State Highway No. 1; thence westerly along said southerly line 150 feet :• the true point of beginning; thence northerly parallel with the west line of sair Tract 4, a distance of 199.25 feet; thence westerly to a point on the west line of sa',J :Tact southerly of the northwest corner thereof; thence southerly to the southwest corner of said Tract 4; thence easterly to the true point of beginning. SUBJECT TO' Easements, restrictions and reservation, of record if any. Dat.d (.2z ygwAsfsi .,02 19 77 Steven C. tic Q/1-nJ/ i /1 7Y4 7 n2 ,?l Amy Jo flsni .(kdrvidusll t h . ;. : ST4e0F WASHtNC.TOIT COW1T� bP 1Cirslg., �. r airy On this Qpedant/icier/wed before ma Steven C ltt:fd GIVEN under my hand and official seal this % -A" day of August 19 77 F.426981 to me known to be stls'irrditridlui described in and who exawted the within and foregoing instrument. and ecknoMM tdg.dthat h. signed the pane as his fret and voluntary act owl deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Notary hrblic sIy In and br the stn, of Wnhington, rehIdInp at lrt.l� VI. ) w) )1) '.- .'!EI? =,� STATUTORY WARRANTY 0i :0 SAF ECU TI I LE INSU.'ANCE COMPANY THIS SPACt RESERVED FUN a• ^ORDER'S USE : and to me known to be the and STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF , Stele JI said Tract 4, with the Westerly 4, a distance 14B feet ▪ t li s 5�1lli� t E111 „mi, r.Dnveydree roc , t_ t uEt•t. of :114u%1 z 3 1. 5 U •- c. pV!NUE Pe. On this day of 19 before me. the undersigned, a Nutary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared President Secretary,r..uectively, of t h e corporation that executed the forgoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the fie, and volun• tery act and seed of said corporation, for the uses and pur• vows therein m.nt'ned, and on oath stated that authorized to execute t seid Imtrument and wet th seal affixed is th) corporate seal of tall carpotatlon. Wltnet my hand. ,d official seal hereto of fixed the day end year first above wrltt.n, Notary Public in and lot the State of Wathington, residing et z • iF� W cY 6 00 LU F- � LL W O LLQ 2 • d I-W Z = F- W 0 :) ca O- 0 F— W W F- H LL O .• z W U O ▪ ~ z haunt at Liability: $31,500.00 c ‘ c .,•Elitictive.Dapp: August 26, 1977 at 8:33 a.m. jf • '1, Insyred: • E . • • ., , • ,• •• ... • 1:: / 31tarj• glitS • • Liiv F•:. • * Titlo itimi 1ir by thti Oilley'is ited in r ; r • • tief.:41NetrMatg011 y• 1 • .1.)1.. • VW rona,....:717.-„,.. cf r:•4 341i . • • 3 Estate 1isinVintitestPinsured w • • •. • r •• • •• • -; • • '.__S E: •••• • " .•• • ••t• i 7 5: ...,;:g: .R...c:r . . ..: :,. :..-, • :-• I • . -, : -.. ..` . i,:t. v.^. =,.. A ': ff-i• 1 :;. - ;1 - 4. : r .? ..::.i•f' tf` ' • ' ,.. 47 :. , I '. s7,-;.-„,7 • :. • foirietfiij tletiletitth reif•itf ig this 'Pol'ity is ter0 it:ran 7" . tP•Eic....,t. • 4, F.r4.1. a.,24 x::. Trzrf.tigi.t. Ai:KZ: T--7i2 ILAU ' '*••tt.. :*.-.*. • ::%.n` 4, ..1 i... 3. ii's ' ; . • • • . • • < • = re 2 0 O 0 Wi u.) W LL. o cn L W z 0 z O co O — O I— UJ LU I w z 0 0 That portion of Tract 4 of Seattle Land Company's 5 Acre Tract, according totthelelsitTmenrded in Yo lueefe of plats, page.90, in King County, Washington, described as follows: • tiOrilektaelyaiyi-ofitrioary ;;' ' Beennietzat thet.intersection of Om south . .Tract 4, with • theneivesterly along said southerly line 1 .. fmet•to the true point of 40!_ • sitertherly parent', with:the west line of eatd Tract 4, a distance .. • of .199...215 feet; .:, • thindirwetterly.to a point on. the west line O.:Said Tract 4, a distant 1411. faisesoutherly:oft the northwest • corner thereof; thiseikleittherly to the souttatest corner of said Tract 4; . ...,thinaintilaterly:.tn* the true point of •beginning. 1 ': ;:. j. :" . 'i- ....... • . 1 . ••‘!,..! ,-.--.•:.... • lite:I.:Mt:Kt VI ,V.s, - • .... ': •:' 4!7 ;., .. ".,. .7 . , ..;1 0 P•::1.; 4. . i i I .•!".:;.•... • • • • • . ' • • : ...: ; ...:. • • • ..% ...--.c • • . • •• .D.edtf tAtet! *Nit..V.0....TE , T.. 1 , •?•:.:ohli..F•ii....:1;•• "! •. 1. . ,:;:::. • • tcf i'. es46 :•1.:•.t.t7ail:,; If •n-si :* ' . • .....:!•23 .. .;ciw; . e!; : ...1. I. !t,',./7-0v, 7 • • ..': 41 r) . •• • • •,.. • • 049 . IF . .!... r >1 1 , ,,, 4,21-ti.. atty. • r tidi tte.RiaY• if4".tv 'fir 7 .' t t7 . q4 • Ditlitt.11P'T ' • i• • SIlf:ISA ..41 ::XtiS .' •nn co§trittiortAt• , r I.• :;•''i.tal : 1 .:Vz. C.: ii•Ar...414..:45Wq". • 0. :1 :0• • • .2t i • . --. .4r1-. . • ..• • tli rairthr 11 . 1 mili*IIIK: 3, - -4 ;'' , ' ; , r.,;-:-Itv.i.pc-i. , ::::, • 7 • .. .. : ' - . '..• • ; ' '•''''f :.I:' . •.'..;; 4 4 . : 4 ."; . :!' : -, . , - ,..i ! ..,••• • r C .. • . • : .:!.. 11 q.04#;Ve•" . • • . : , . • • Order* No, '3678131 . . • • • • ,• ••••• ••••• , • • • • • : • • •••• : . f• ' • •C ;.•• ' ••:".T — •:,••• • • s it • VS; '1 :AU . • • EXHIBIT NI* . • :•-• • : • :- • • • • ••••,. • ' ••• • • ••••,:, . • .$ • ". • • ‘• • • 4 0 • ` !•:', :1".• '.h Order No. 367883 SPECIAL. EXCEPTIONS: NOTE: • . . , • • • r . • • -.I,. • • ., • 1. Ensiment affecting a portion ctf'said premises and for the purposes *hereleaft40:stated, as disclosed bYinstrument recorded on June 29, • 1973;1* thiOf1ee of the "teenran officer of King County, Washington, under recording number 7306290088, . FOrt Ingress, egOemOnirutility purposes % ' • Southerbilf*Cdihe easterly 25 feet of said • • premises' • • • 2. .4.itneaffecting a - portiOn ofsaid premises and for the purposes heiinftle*tated, as disclosed by Instrument recorded on April 16, 19500W .4ffiCia.tiftivfilici officer of King County, Washington, undire nuettiri234343;••' • Totrie• so=e ' tAftkINhAtit°F-Y 'AildiOrmOsii other property 3. Deed of Trust dated August 22, 1977, recorded on AugUst 26, 1977, in the Department of Records and Elections of King County, Washington, under ,King County Recording Number 7708260410, to secure an indebtedness of $29,900.00, and any additional advances, or other obligations secured thereby; Grantor: SHEILA J. BURNS, an unmarried woman Trustee: SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Beneficiary: wino SAYINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Washington corporation FOR PRINTED SCHEDULE NB" (GENERAL .EXCEPTION) SEE ATTACHED INSERT. `." z < • Z C4 W m -I 0 0 tow cn -J U) IL Li j 0 g 7-1 u_ I z o ZI- Lij CI 0 2 w z 131.- W w o o o 20 tcOlo l+C.t Fit-c-- J. O'1 b °o Lo Z 0 Oz9 ' a tA Sc F(144 V re & 7 "11 012,(00&9(I. I'17' Dp 4 45 ▪ • ▪ 66 • • 4.b,B 1 A t 3 41. r. g9 ca/•.9,See) �r te a' ta 6 7(3 x 4 4 0 ' 4 ( ) •l,2 ;1 .:t1\ tts ✓ h• C Z. o - rI 4114 a . • C ob Q►. h 0 . . . • • .... 0 0 • ri al • 0 tv N /Do 4 I00 PJ 5 a z • w 6 U 0 CO W F- co ti w u _ c = W z � F- LU w U� 0 — DI-- w w tL � w z = O ~ z Mr. Bill Bieber Opus Northwest, LLC 915 =118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98007 Subject: Geotechnical Report Opus Park 5/405 Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Bieber: As requested, we have conducted a geotechnical engineering study for the subject project. The attached report presents our findings and recommendations for the geotechnical aspects of project design and construction. Our field exploration indicates the building site is generally underlain by medium dense silty sand with gravel. Test pits excavated in the northern portion of the site revealed uncontrolled fill containing construction debris to depths of six feet to the west, and greater than 15 feet to the east. In our opinion, soil conditions in the southern building area will be suitable for support of the structure as proposed. It is also our opinion that construction of a paved parking lot can be completed as planned over the existing fills in the northern portion of the site, provided the owner is willing to accept some risk of future pavement settlement. Further discussion and detailed recommendations regarding these issues, as well as other geotechnical considerations, are provided in the attached report. We trust this information is sufficient for your current needs. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call. Sincer 7* ..y . c1,1 ' s . .,,,„.. .... A sp ,orel, Sphe:eer, Piiictal;>yngin a 4 :4 k , rIA • • SY1 c; sfl"t . 'psr - ts 0l1 @J03 September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 Phone (425) 821 - 7777.• Fax (425) 821 -4334 • terra @terra - associates.com �....:...�.. .. :..:..mss �'�K»w�.•,��.,::,:�„�;a -..... f .� .,. �+-' �° �. v�.., a.., a... A...... � ....,.:•�.,�a+w�xa�r:+�+,,r,�rc TABLE OF CONTENTS - page 1.0 Project Description 1 2.0 Site Conditions 1 2.1 Surface 1 2.2 Soil 2 2.3 Groundwater . ' 2 3.0 Geologic Hazards 2 ' 3.1 Erosion 2 3.2 Landslide 2 3.3 Seismic 3 4.0 Discussion and Recommendations 3 4.1 General 3 4.2 Site. Preparation and Grading 4 4.3 Excavation and Dewatering 5 4.4 Slopes and Embankments 6 4.5 Foundations 6 4.6 Slab -on -Grade Construction • 6 4.7 Lower -Level Retaining Walls 7 4.8 Detention Vault 8 4.9 . Drainage 8 4.10 Utilities ' 8 4.11 Pavements 9 5.0. Additional Services _ 10 6.0 Limitations 10 Figures Vicinity Map Figure 1 Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 Retaining Wall Drainage. Detail Figure 3 Appendix . . Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Appendix A Geotechnical Report Opus Park 5/405 Tukwila, Washington Q w • 2 J 0 U 0 CO 0 W= 1.0 . PROJECT DESCRIPTION — ' I w 0 Planned development will include constructing a three -level office structure, along with associated utilities and 2 paved access and parking. The lower floor of the structure will daylight to the east, with the upper floor at grade Q with 51st Avenue South to the west. The structure will also include dock -high loading areas or truck wells on . • d both the north and south sides of the building. Access to the site will be off of 51st Avenue South, with surface H = z!— parking provided at the structures perimeter. ▪ 0 Z I— Fill material will be required over most of the site area to achieve the planned construction grades. The fill depth 2 will range from a minimum of about 2 feet to the east to a maximum of about 12 feet to the west. Along the east 0 N and south sides of the site, the fill will be supported by retaining wall construction. Development stormwater o F- will be routed for collection and controlled discharge to a detention vault below the eastern parking area. The = 0 U vault foundations will require excavation of about 12 feet below current site grade. z The recommendations in the following sections of this report are based upon our understanding of the above v design features. If actual features vary or changes are made, we should review them in order to modify our 00 F- recommendations, as required. We should review final design drawings and specifications to verify that our Z recommendations have been properly interpreted and incorporated into project design. 2.0 SITE CONDITIONS 2.1 Surface The project site is located east and adjacent to 51st Avenue South, approximately one block north of South 151st Street in Tukwila, Washington. The approximate location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map, Figure 1. Currently, the site is occupied by single- family structures with associated driveways and outbuildings. The area of the site is predominantly open and landscaped with grass, shrubs, and trees. Overall grades on the site slope gently to the east, with approximately 20 feet of relief carried over a slope gradient of less than 10 percent. Isolated east - facing slopes are present in the northwestern and southwestern corners of the site, where locally, 18 to 22 feet of elevation relief occurs over gradients ranging from 40 to 100 percent. Two drainage swales, one located in the north - central portion of the site and the other in the southwestern corner, convey surface water runoff from 51st Avenue South to a drainage swale adjacent to Interstate 5 (I -5), immediately east of the site. 2.2 Soil Seven soil test pits were excavated to depths between 4 to 15 feet below current site grades. Five test pits were located in the building area, and two test pits were located in the north parking lot area. The approximate z locations of the test, pits are shown on Figure 2. Test pit logs describing conditions observed are attached as Figures A -2 through A -5. Soil conditions we observed in the southern office building area consisted of 8 to 24 inches of dark brown topsoil -J 0 overlying medium dense silty sand with gravel. At depth, the silty sand transitioned to relatively clean sand with Cl) gravel, also in a medium dense field condition. We observed what appears to be an isolated fill area at Test Pit w = TP -1 excavated in the west portion of the site. At Test Pit TP -2, which was excavated adjacent to Test Pit TP -1, co we did not observe fill soils. w 0 In the north parking lot, we observed about 6 feet of fill to the west, and greater than 15 feet of fill to the east. g Q The test pit excavated along the eastern edge of the north lot did not get through the fill. The fill is comprised of old construction debris including asphalt, concrete, brick, rebar, and paint cans. Based on our observations, it appears that the flatter portion of the north parcel, and the eastern slope below, is comprised entirely of old fill. z f- I- O z W p U We observed groundwater at three of the seven test pits excavated on -site. These included Test Pits TP -2, TP -3 0 F. and TP-4. The groundwater was observed at a depth of about 11 feet below current site grades at Test Pit TP -2 = W U and 6 to 7 feet at Test Pits TP -3 and TP-4. These depths correspond to elevations of about 84 to 85 feet to the u_ west, and 83 feet to the east. w z Uc The groundwater was observed flowing from the cleaner sand and gravel formation encountered at depth in the test pits. It is likely that groundwater is present year round and fluctuates in elevation with seasonal weather z variations. 2.3 Groundwater 3.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3.1 Erosion Soils at the site will be subject to erosion when in an exposed condition. The greatest risk for erosion will occur during construction grading. Given the relatively gentle sloping terrain to the east, we would not consider the site as an erosion hazard area. However, erosion protection measures, as required by the City of Tukwila, will need to be in place prior to starting grading activity on the site. 3.2 Steep Slopes During our site visit, we did not find any evidence suggesting past landslides or slope movement. The site slopes appeared stable, and we did not observe any surface features indicating past slope stability problems. In our opinion, provided the recommendations in this report are followed, development of the site as proposed will not increase the potential for slope instability on -site or on adjacent properties, and the risk for such an occurrence would be minimal. �.isV�w�evr"�g,E Page No. 2 h September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 04.1474 w di al l.Y.y:wi7Rixs"a 3.3 Seismic September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 The Puget Sound area falls within Seismic Zone 3, as classified by the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). Based on the soil conditions encountered and the local geology from Table 16 -J of the 1999 UBC, soil type SD should be used. _ ~ z Liquefaction is a phenomenon where there is a reduction or complete loss of soil strength due to an increase in v water pressure induced by vibrations. Liquefaction mainly affects geologically recent deposits of fine- grained co o sands that are below the groundwater table. Soils of this nature derive their strength from intergranular friction. w The generated water pressure or pore pressure essentially separates the soil grains and eliminates this intergranular friction; thus, eliminating the soil's strength. Coarser - grained deposits of sand and gravel are w 0 0 normally not affected because their hydraulic conductivity allows for drainage or dissipation of these excess pore pressures. Silts and clays are normally not affected because of the cohesive component of their shear strength. � J ¢ The vibration source typically considered in liquefaction analysis is, a seismic event or earthquake. w a = w Based on the soil and groundwater conditions we observed, in our opinion, the risk for liquefaction related z F — impacts to the planned development is minimal. w O al U� 0 Y wW ILL- z u.i U Based on our study, in our opinion, there are no geotechnical considerations that would preclude development as proposed. The structure can be supported on conventional spread footings bearing on competent native soils z observed below the upper 12 to 24 inches of organic topsoil. Alternatively, structural fill placed and compacted above these native soils can be used to support the building foundations. Floor slabs and pavements can be similarly supported. 4.0 DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 General The existing debris fill observed in the northern parking lot area would not be suitable for support of building foundations or floor slabs. Paved parking can be constructed over the fill, provided the owner is willing to accept some risk for future pavement settlement. The native soils encountered at the site contain a significant amount of fines and will be difficult to compact as structural fill when too wet. The ability to use native soil from site excavations as structural fill will depend on its moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions at the time of construction. If grading activities will take place during the winter season, the owner should be prepared to import free - draining granular material for use as structural fill and backfill. Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design considerations are provided in the following sections. These recommendations should be incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. Page No. 3 ., Kd s+{' n-' e' d{ 3:l Yf.".., %�;:rAlf3GCwFS4S.�'f.GA:'}'tibJT 4.2 Site Preparation and Grading Site preparation will require demolition of existing structures. Demolition should include removal of building foundations and floor slabs from below areas of new building foundations. Where structural fill will be placed to achieve construction grades, the existing slabs and pavement will not need to be removed, provided the fill has a minimum thickness of two feet. Where not removed, the pavement and slabs should be fractured in place prior to filling to prevent them from acting as a single rigid element below the new structural fill. Demolition should also include removal or sealing of abandoned utility pipes and other subterranean structures. Following demolition, all vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious materials should be stripped and removed from areas of new construction. Surfacing stripping ranging from 8 to 24 inches should be expected to remove the organic topsoil layer. Stripped vegetation debris should be removed from the site. Organic topsoil will not be suitable for use as structural fill but may be used for limited depths in non - structural areas. Once clearing and stripping operations are complete, cut and fill operations can be initiated to establish desired building grades. Prior to placing fill, all exposed surfaces should be proofrolled to determine if any isolated soft and yielding areas are present. Proofrolling should also be performed in cut areas that will provide direct support for new construction. If excessively yielding areas are observed, and they cannot be stabilized in place by compaction, the affected soils should be excavated and removed to firm bearing and grade restored with new structural fill.. If the depth of excavation to remove unstable soils is excessive, use of a geotextile reinforcing/separation fabric, such as Mirafi 500X or equivalent, can be considered in conjunction with structural fill. Our experience has shown that, in general, a minimum of 18 inches of a clean, granular structural fill over the geotextile fabric should establish a stable bearing surface. Our study indicates that soils in the northern parking area are composed of debris laden fill that extends to depths of 6 feet below existing grade to the west, and greater than 15 feet to the east. In our opinion, construction of a paved parking lot in this area is feasible provided the owner is willing to accept some risk for future pavement settlement. To establish suitable immediate support for the pavement structure, the above outlined procedure should be followed. In addition, we recommend the pavement be supported on a minimum of 18 inches of new structural fill. This will require some excavation and removal of the existing fill in the northern portion of the parking area where final grades are relatively close to existing. The top 12 inches of subgrade should also be amended with Portland Cement to construct a soil cement base as recommended in the pavement section of this report. Our study indicates that the native soils contain a sufficient percentage of fines (silt and clay size particles) that will make them difficult to compact as structural fill if they are too wet or too dry. The existing debris laden fill in the northern portion of the site is not suitable for reuse as structural fill or utility trench backfill and should be removed form the site when excavated. The ability to use native soils from site excavations as structural fill will depend on the soil's moisture content and the prevailing weather conditions when site grading activities take place. Native soils that are too wet to properly compact could be dried by aeration during dry weather conditions or mixed with an additive, such as cement, cement kiln dust (CKD), or lime to stabilize the soil and facilitate compaction. If an additive is used, additional best management practices (BMP'S) for its use will need to be incorporated into the temporary erosion and sedimentation control plan (TESC) for the project. Page No. 4 September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 U.S. Sieve Size Percent Passing 6 inches 100 No. 4 75 maximum No. 200 5 maximum* *Based on the 3/4 -inch fraction September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 If grading activities are planned during the wet winter months or if they are initiated during the summer and extend into fall and winter, the owner should be prepared to import wet weather structural fill. For this purpose, we recommend importing a granular soil that meets the following grading requirements: Prior to use, Terra Associates, Inc. should examine and test all materials imported to the site for use as structural fill. Structural fill should be placed in uniform loose layers not exceeding 12 inches and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of the soil's maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D -698 (Standard Proctor). The moisture content of the soil at the time of compaction should be within two percent of its optimum, as determined by this ASTM standard. In non - structural areas or for backfill in utility trenches below a depth of 4 feet, the degree of compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. 4.3 Excavation and Dewatering All excavations at the site associated with confined spaces, such as utility trenches and lower building levels, must be completed in accordance with local, state, or federal requirements. Based on current Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (OSHA) regulations, these soils would be classified as Group C soils. Accordingly, for excavations more than 4 feet and less than 20 feet deep, the side slopes should be laid back at a minimum slope inclination of 1.5:1 (Horizontal:Vertical). If there is insufficient room to complete the excavations in this manner or if excavations greater than 20 feet deep are planned, you may need to use temporary shoring to support the excavations. Groundwater seepage should be anticipated within excavations extending below elevation 85 feet. Based on our study, the volume of water and rate of flow into the excavation would be moderate. For excavations that will extend more than two feet below the groundwater table, the contractor should plan to predrain the excavations using dewatering wells. This should be specifically planned for the stormwater detention vault in the eastern portion of the site where the excavation to construct the vault will extend six feet below the groundwater table we observed at the time of our field exploration. The above information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants and should not be construed to imply that Terra Associates, Inc. assumes responsibility for job site safety. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. Page No. 5 4.4 Slopes and Embankments All permanent cut and fill slopes should be graded with a finished inclination of no greater than 2:1. Upon completion of grading, the slope face should be appropriately vegetated or provided with other physical means to guard against erosion. Final grades at the top of the slope must promote surface drainage away from the slope z crest. Water must not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the slope face: If surface runoff must be directed w towards the slope, the runoff should be controlled at the top of the slope, piped in a closed conduit installed on v the slope face, and taken to an appropriate point of discharge beyond the toe. c.) O co LLI LIJ All fill placed for embankment construction should meet the structural fill requirements in the Site Preparation and Grading section. In addition, if the new fills will be placed over existing slopes of 20 percent or greater, the N 0 structural fill should be keyed and benched into competent native slope soils g _ � w Z = Z w w The building may be supported on conventional spread foundations bearing on competent native soils or on v structural fills placed above competent native soils. Foundation subgrades should be prepared as recommended o H in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Perimeter foundations exposed to the weather should be a minimum w w depth of 18 inches below final exterior grades. Interior foundations can be constructed at any convenient depth F below the floor slab. �'-- p 4.5 Foundations Spread Footings Foundations can be dimensioned for a net allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 pounds per square foot (psf). For short-term loads, such as wind and seismic, a one -third increase in this allowable capacity can be used. With structural loading as anticipated and this bearing stress applied, estimated total settlements are about one inch, of which one -half inch would be differential in nature. For designing foundations to resist lateral loads, a base friction coefficient of 0.35 can be used. Passive earth pressures acting on the side of the footing can also be considered. We recommend calculating this lateral resistance using an equivalent fluid weight of 300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). We recommend not including the upper 12 inches of soil in this computation because they can be affected by weather or disturbed by future grading activity. This value assumes the foundation will be constructed neat against competent native soil or backfilled with structural fill as described in the Site Preparation and Grading section. The values recommended include a safety factor of 1.5. 4.6 Slab -on -Grade Construction Slabs -on -grade may be supported on the subgrade prepared as recommended in the Site Preparation and Grading section. Immediately below the floor slab, we recommend placing a four -inch thick capillary break layer of clean, free - draining sand or gravel that has less than three percent passing the No. 200 sieve. This material will reduce the potential for upward capillary movement of water through the underlying soil and subsequent wetting of the floor slab. Page No. 6 September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 z September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 Where moisture by vapor transmission is undesirable, a durable plastic membrane should be placed over the capillary break layer. The membrane should be covered with two inches of clean coarse moist sand or fine gravel to guard against damage during construction and to aid in curing of the concrete. 4.7 Lower -Level Building and Site Retaining Walls The magnitude of earth pressure development on lower -level building and site retaining walls will partly depend on the quality of the wall backfill. We recommend placing and compacting wall backfill as structural fill. Below improved areas, such as pavements or floor slabs, the backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry unit weight, as determined by ASTM Test Designation D -698 (Standard Proctor). In unimproved areas, the relative compaction can be reduced to 90 percent. To guard against hydrostatic pressure development, wall drainage must also be installed. A typical recommended wall drainage detail is shown on Figure 3. With wall backfill placed and compacted as recommended and drainage properly installed, we recommend designing unrestrained walls for an active earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 35 pcf. For restrained walls, an additional uniform lateral pressure of 100 psf should be included. For a 2:1 back slope condition, an earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 50 pcf should be used. To account for normal traffic surcharge loading, the walls should be designed for an additional height of two feet. Friction at the base of foundations and passive earth pressure will provide resistance to these lateral loads. Values for these parameters are provided in the Foundations section. Several wall options are available for the site retaining walls that will be used to accommodate vertical breaks in grade at the perimeter of the development. These would include conventional cast -in -place concrete walls, gravity block walls, and mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls faced with segmental blocks or with a fabric wrapped face. Soil parameters, as recommended, in the preceding paragraph should be used for design of cast in place or gravity wall systems. For design of MSE walls, we recommend using a soil unit weight of 130 pcf and a soil internal friction angle of 36 degrees in the reinforced and backfill soil zones. For the foundation, a soil unit weight of 120 pcf and internal friction angle of 34 degrees should be used. The MSE walls must be constructed using a. granular structural fill in the reinforced soil zone. The structural fill should have a maximum aggregate size of 3 inches and a maximum of 30 percent passing the number 200 sieve. The eastern retaining wall that is planned along the northern parking area will require excavation and replacement of the existing fills with structural fill to establish suitable foundation support. At minimum, we recommend excavating and replacing three feet of the existing fill with structural fill that is placed and compacted as outlined in the Section 4.2 of this report. Improvement of the wall foundation should extend two feet laterally from the edge of the wall footing. Page No. 7 �2 .t - tt*Srt,c4MilAtWvio. 4.8 Detention Vault September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 As noted earlier, dewatering will be required for the vault excavation during construction. The stormwater detention vault can be designed using parameters as recommended in Sections 4.5 and 4.7 of this report. In addition to normal earth pressures, the vault design will need to consider uplift or buoyancy forces and hydrostatic loading on the vault walls if perimeter wall drainage of the vault is not provided. Typically, because of grades, it is not possible to install the drainage to the base of the vault and provide for discharge of the collected groundwater. In this case, we recommend that perimeter wall drainage be installed with the drainpipe tied to discharge at the elevation of the vault outfall pipe. The uplift force on the vault that would need to be considered in the design would be equal to the difference in elevation from the base of the vault to the drainpipe invert. For design of the vault walls, hydrostatic loading would only need to be considered for that portion of the wall below the drainpipe invert elevation. For hydrostatic loading considerations, an earth pressure equivalent to a fluid weighing 85 pcf should be used. 4.9 Drainage Surface Final exterior grades should promote free and positive drainage away from the site at all times. Water must not be allowed to pond or collect adjacent t� foundations or within the immediate building area. We recommend providing a minimum drainage gradient of three percent for a minimum distance of ten feet from the building perimeter, except in paved locations. In paved locations, a minimum gradient of one percent should be provided unless provisions are included for collection and disposal of surface water adjacent to the structure. Surface water must not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the crest of the site slopes and embankments. Surface water should be directed away from the slope crests to a point of collection and controlled discharge. If site grades do not allow for directing surface water away from the slopes, then water should be collected and tightlined down the slope face in a controlled manner. Subsurface In addition to wall drainage for below grade building walls, we recommend installing perimeter drains adjacent all exterior building foundations. Foundation drains should be tightlined separate from the roof drain system to a controlled point of approved discharge. 4.10 Utilities Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association (APWA) specifications. At minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural fill as described in Section 4.2. As noted, with the exception of the debris laden fill in the northern portion of the site native soils excavated on -site should be suitable for use as backfill material. If utility construction will take place during the winter, it may be necessary to import suitable wet weather fill for utility trench backfilling. Page No. 8 4.11 Pavements As a means to prepare a stable subgrade and pavement base, we recommend using a soil cement application. The soil cement can be constructed using the native soils below the organic surface layer or imported mineral fill soil. The subgrade should be initially prepared as recommended in Section 4.2 of this report. Following grading, we recommend scarifying the top 12 inches of the subgrade and then blending in Type 1 Portland Cement at a rate ranging from of 65 to 80 pounds per square yard of surface area. The actual rate required should be determined when the subgrade is rough graded. The cement should be blended uniformly with the soils, with the mixture also moisture conditioned, as necessary. The soil cement moisture should be within —1 to +3 percent of optimum, as determined by ATSM Test Designation D -698 (Standard Proctor) prior to compaction. Once blended and conditioned, the soil cement should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent of its maximum dry density as determined by this ASTM standard. The soil cement should achieve a minimum three -day compressive strength of 150 psi. Initial compaction of the soil cement should be accomplished with a sheep's foot compactor. Once compacted, rough grading can be completed with final compaction achieved using a steel -drum roller. Compaction and rough grading should be completed within a two -hour time period following application and blending of the cement with the soil. After grading and compaction, traffic should stay off the soil cement base for a minimum of three days to allow the base to cure and gain its initial compressive strength. Pavement construction should then be completed shortly following this initial curing period. If the soil cement base will not be paved over following initial curing, and traffic will traverse the base, we recommend placing a two -inch thick layer of crushed rock over the soil cement to reduce surface degradation. Quality control during construction of the soil cement base should include verification of the following: • Cement application rate • Moisture and compaction • Compressive strength A minimum of three test specimens from the same soil cement sample should be prepared for compressive strength testing for each day's construction. Traffic at the facility will mainly consist of cars and light trucks, with occasional heavy traffic in the form of delivery trucks, buses, and trash removal vehicles. We recommend that the pavement section constructed over the 12 inches of soil cement base consist of 2 inches of asphalt concrete (AC). The AC should meet Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) specifications for Class 13 mix. Long -term pavement performance will depend on surface drainage. A poorly- drained pavement section will be subject to premature failure as a result of surface water infiltrating into the subgrade soils and reducing their supporting capability. For optimum pavement performance, we recommend surface drainage gradients of at least two percent. Some degree of longitudinal and transverse cracking of the pavement surface should be expected over time. Regular maintenance should be planned to seal cracks when they occur. Page No. 9 September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 z _ I- w ar 00 N co W J = F- U) ti WO L Q CD I CI i _ W z � F- O Z ~ U • � O - O H W W I F- 1 � z u.i = OH z As noted earlier, we observed groundwater seepage at elevations ranging from 83 to 85 feet below existing surface grades. With proposed pavement grades ranging from Elev. 92 to the east and Elev. 110 to the west, subdrains beneath the pavement to control groundwater flow, which would prevent subgrade instability, would not be required. Z I � W G . 5.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES 0 0 co o Terra Associates, Inc.. should review the final design and specifications in order to verify that earthwork and CO foundation recommendations have been properly interpreted and implemented in project design. We should also co u- w provide geotechnical services during construction in order to observe compliance with the design concepts, g specifications, and recommendations. This will allow for design changes if subsurface conditions differ from ' g those anticipated prior to the start of construction. cr = w z t- 0 z F- w w This report is the copyrighted property of Terra Associates, Inc., and was prepared in accordance with generally 0 co accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This report is intended for specific application to the Opus Park 01 5/405 project and for the exclusive use of Opus Northwest, LLC and their authorized representatives. No other = 0 warranty, expressed or implied, is made. tL 0 The analyses and recommendations presented in this report are based upon data obtained from the test pits 0 excavated on -site. Variations in soil conditions can occur, the nature and extent of which may not become ~O H evident until construction. If variations appear evident, Terra Associates, Inc. should be requested to reevaluate z the recommendations in this report prior to proceeding with construction. 6.0 LIMITATIONS Page No. 10 September 21, 2001 Project No. T-4800 40TH AV 4 cr. +Am s 4 > A " x •(4. , -Per244ND i 0 10 , -s) 4 N. Ti S ''N,, Li ' , S 133RD ia. --........_____,..- . BLACK R ER .. ' s- 1315t CT ,-/- ALT Hs • e 3 S 1326D ST t v"' ' 'Ll - j 4 I r•- •' : .: P ci. 7 - 2-"L-S-I A 4 4 0 • .4e,rA. ...' •,,,. ,.. ,' e. P a t -...." RIDE II 4 .) '''.'.',''';'-( e '14 c° % 13 ; .:". - :-- IN '.340 ' . ' • S 135TH ST 1.3 H : . .. ' ' • - s i --1. .."B 7 L:CK RIVER RIPARIAN 'FOREST ‘0,5. ; :: : , 5 ' . : '', . ' .1. '-''' : - ' - • - ' .." .,-' ‘: ' ..-- - . • •,..;. D • ly ', ...;',': •• 1 S al , , • er,, DALE. . ,- ••;1‘,1 '41... .i'.. ii u ` 4 sk 4 4 IS) y. F ... -Z1 s'. l'.-P 4‘ • • • :- - • - -.. - •N1 *. 4. GoLF ................. :. S 138 E P .. ‘-‘,‘ OD s w , k v K<•,..p''. ...-... a 140TH < "r ST c ip PK 1 l• . ' W ' ' L.: ''..........2-rii D ST , MID ul ST I .; S . t " .'c. g ,,, ,r, 1. , '0 S 54 > -a in 144 ,,,,\ m % • 42 ND $ 5.,. iiii, - u ., -.11 r \kj ' *.‘ 7 t. ..--.........,._ . VL i / . 1 'R I i ST 14 R b ,*. '' ., \ .. • L \ -6800- ... ;••• 5000 S 144H ....:...(-4 L. I • HAZEL NuT cll" ,'.. : ...... * FS '‘'... .FORT' .\ EL I "e■ fi l OA S F, I '. " .. x 4 FOSTER HS L — i 4400 142 144 FS I 4 ' ...,) in .1 4600 - 1 I 67 3 It;.: 4 ,,t .. In ..t. ....... > -4 *.‘. " 0 12, li S A. .„, f 1-.. 151ST S 4200 ISITE. -5D ST S 1 22 d 4200 V) -55.1 9THnST. 150 5' S 1 •-, V) • .. • . 5.149TH S '''' ci r'itiaorif • .1: s Ism. ST 1.. PL in S 152ND cq ST 6 '04 , E ; -f S 149TH s'r •:41 zi -c .•-• ''';•: --'.',,:., 1, l ..... 7:',..;FARK • . • •• - ..... .• \ U3 5 149135 t : -'. 151 T ST '!), . . • \ ':',Is' '',.. 4,q." 0. 1 i s,3 " • """' . '62 Vi ' 1 .tr0 4 ) .. n !.i t, 3 ' 24 . .,t.xe; GO' ,. ••••• , N .." SW' mm ii ST ''''" s K E' pL 0- ',.. ,,,, .. '."1-,. o 2NO PL ;1; " 5100 'i f. ST • '4 ' . "‘„;', . \ S 153RD o ••• ' .. '• S 156T ST OZO . . - \ Ceb.,,. "i t • - A il - '"■•- ■......„ -, -_................„--_____.• --1...209- ; . • • JACKSON SW • •• •:- 158 TH 44 ST v) ili - ": : ' "• i`e.,. fill • 60TH SPRINgS . s T 4:-.'", OTH op 1 161. 1 .,/ 1 7 / 'v SOUTHCENTER P.' •-•:..- .'.: • ti: MALL • p KW Y VANS BUCK i . ! EMBASSY ° ' e ' c i .1 e 9,p ';.•' •itE.S.TVIEW C -.1 4", . .. - ..: , .'..s 163.. Z' a . ..>., S"' 16 I PI r• N0F.,... . /i9,n4 • . ..._ SUITES . • .••". • : \ Removal S S ,,,, si 161T sr :LI .g. I - DR BAKER c" BLVD ce 2 MINI•74 11€1111111111M .., 9 ...' a STRANDER ''C BLVD • "C„.,... 5 ""it" "L:;:.......- -- N A . ... . .. .................... .. . - NTON ...: litr'f4r4ri,:J. - , p-.13..RENTO ' p .1•; ,•,',',4/ET,PtAID in ... < . -. ,;:.'*■ 141 .. •- ST I 164TH ST,s6S) , CC * 111 SUMS r V) SOUTHCENT PLAZA 0 Ei 26 CouRTVA 2 BY nAFIRIorr c ") rn '',;• 27 €." 168TH S 167TH ST .5.466TH : , S ''. R `'.'' 8 -** • , --,-" TRECK DR , \ IN00 s 7:. -c ST 5 168 c , 560Th 0 - S 5 170TH NI 16TH LN 5 I ST ST L__ 95, ' LLI c, .... s 4400 / 0 ST 100 R z --I rn CORPORAT Po FS ( (wan< , . CACEPSFIr \,. PAPS . ST 172ND REFERENCE: Thomas Guide, Metropolitan Edition, 2001. Page 655. •..1,••;• •• Terra Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants VICINITY MAP OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. 4800 Date SEPT 2001 Figure 1 Project Info 3 rn -1 9 ,, O n CO -4.- G -n Project Address OPUS PARK 5/405 Area in ft Allowed x Area Date 9/27/2001 51ST AVENUE SOUTH AND I5 For Building Department Use TUKWILA, WA Applicant Name: NELSON ELECTRIC, INC Applicant Address: 9620 STONE AVENUE N., SEATTLE, WA 98103 Applicant Phone: 206 523 -4525 Alteration Exceptions (check appropriate box) ❑ No changes are being made to the lighting ❑ Less than 60% of the fixtures are new, and installed lighting wattage is not being increased Location (floor /room no.) Occupancy Description Allowed Watts per ft ** Area in ft Allowed x Area ** From Table 15 -1 (over) - document all exceptions on form LTG-LPA Total Allowed Watts Refe Location Number of Watts/ Watts (floor /room no.) Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Interior Total Proposed Watts Allowed Watts Area in ft2 Allowed Watts Location Description per ft or per if (or If for perimeter) x ft (or x If) Covered Parking 0.2 W /ft Open Parking EXTERIOR SITE PARKING 0.2 W /ft 59432.0 11886.4 Outdoor Areas 0.2 W /ft Bldg. (by facade) 0.25 W /ft Bldg. (by perim) 7.5 W /If Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but not both) Total Allowed Watts 11886.4 ' Number of Watts/ • Watts Location Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed PARRINO TYPE HP1 -• SINGLE 250W HS CUTOFF ON 30' POLE 11 295.0 3245.0 PARKING TYPE HP2 - TWIN 250W MH CUTOFFS ON 30' POLE 2 590.0 1180.0 LOADING DOCK TYPE HWl - 175W Mt WALL MOUNT 4 205 . 0 820 . 0 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 5245.0 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Lighting Summary LTG -SUM t ojt" : tL scription Compliance Option New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Alteration Q Prescriptive (See Qualification 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) be used. Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) the default table in the NREC Technical Reference•Manual may also be used. U se mtgr listed maximum Input wattage. For fixtures with hard -wired ballasts only, 1 Preliminary Lighting Plan - Specifications Page 1 oft I the default table in the NHEC Technical re manual may also First Edition - June, 1998 .R_ StZTAWh' � TRQ'm�'�wSL1'b �1lm Z ~ Z QQ • � i 0 O 0 0 w= H U) u_ w 0 2 u- Q I • O � Z i- 0 ZI•- w 0 0— 0 I- W H � tl O Z W U = H1- 0 Z Allowed Watts Area in ft2 Allowed Watts Location Description per ft or per if (or If for perimeter) x ft (or x If) Covered Parking 0.2 W /ft Open Parking EXTERIOR SITE PARKING 0.2 W /ft 59432.0 11886.4 Outdoor Areas 0.2 W /ft Bldg. (by facade) 0.25 W /ft Bldg. (by perim) 7.5 W /If Note: for building exterior, choose either the facade area or the perimeter method, but not both) Total Allowed Watts 11886.4 ' Number of Watts/ • Watts Location Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed PARRINO TYPE HP1 -• SINGLE 250W HS CUTOFF ON 30' POLE 11 295.0 3245.0 PARKING TYPE HP2 - TWIN 250W MH CUTOFFS ON 30' POLE 2 590.0 1180.0 LOADING DOCK TYPE HWl - 175W Mt WALL MOUNT 4 205 . 0 820 . 0 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 5245.0 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Lighting Summary LTG -SUM t ojt" : tL scription Compliance Option New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Alteration Q Prescriptive (See Qualification 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) be used. Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) the default table in the NREC Technical Reference•Manual may also be used. U se mtgr listed maximum Input wattage. For fixtures with hard -wired ballasts only, 1 Preliminary Lighting Plan - Specifications Page 1 oft I the default table in the NHEC Technical re manual may also First Edition - June, 1998 .R_ StZTAWh' � TRQ'm�'�wSL1'b �1lm Z ~ Z QQ • � i 0 O 0 0 w= H U) u_ w 0 2 u- Q I • O � Z i- 0 ZI•- w 0 0— 0 I- W H � tl O Z W U = H1- 0 Z ' Number of Watts/ • Watts Location Fixture Description Fixtures Fixture Proposed PARRINO TYPE HP1 -• SINGLE 250W HS CUTOFF ON 30' POLE 11 295.0 3245.0 PARKING TYPE HP2 - TWIN 250W MH CUTOFFS ON 30' POLE 2 590.0 1180.0 LOADING DOCK TYPE HWl - 175W Mt WALL MOUNT 4 205 . 0 820 . 0 Total Proposed Watts may not exceed Total Allowed Watts for Exterior Total Proposed Watts 5245.0 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Lighting Summary LTG -SUM t ojt" : tL scription Compliance Option New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Alteration Q Prescriptive (See Qualification 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) be used. Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) the default table in the NREC Technical Reference•Manual may also be used. U se mtgr listed maximum Input wattage. For fixtures with hard -wired ballasts only, 1 Preliminary Lighting Plan - Specifications Page 1 oft I the default table in the NHEC Technical re manual may also First Edition - June, 1998 .R_ StZTAWh' � TRQ'm�'�wSL1'b �1lm Z ~ Z QQ • � i 0 O 0 0 w= H U) u_ w 0 2 u- Q I • O � Z i- 0 ZI•- w 0 0— 0 I- W H � tl O Z W U = H1- 0 Z 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Forms 1997 Washington State Nonresidential Energy Code Compliance Form Lighting Summary LTG -SUM t ojt" : tL scription Compliance Option New Building ❑ Addition ❑ Alteration Q Prescriptive (See Qualification 0 Lighting Power Allowance 0 Systems Analysis Checklist (over). Indicate Prescriptive & LPA spaces clearly on plans.) Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Interior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Interior) be used. Maximum Allowed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) Proposed Lighting Wattage (Exterior) the default table in the NREC Technical Reference•Manual may also be used. U se mtgr listed maximum Input wattage. For fixtures with hard -wired ballasts only, 1 Preliminary Lighting Plan - Specifications Page 1 oft I the default table in the NHEC Technical re manual may also First Edition - June, 1998 .R_ StZTAWh' � TRQ'm�'�wSL1'b �1lm Z ~ Z QQ • � i 0 O 0 0 w= H U) u_ w 0 2 u- Q I • O � Z i- 0 ZI•- w 0 0— 0 I- W H � tl O Z W U = H1- 0 Z Type Description Section 1650.. Luminaire Schedule OPUS Park 5 /405, Seattle Washington HP1 250 watt Metal Halide cutoff luminaire on 5" square x 25', 7 gauge steel light standard. Die cast aluminum housing with tempered glass lens in die cast aluminum doorframe. Segmented reflector system providing TES Type III distribution. (1) HPF CWA ballast for use with 250 watt Metal Halide lamp. Lamp shall be Philips MH250/U or equal. s. * Gardco G181- 3XL- 250MH- 277- BRP- /SSS30 -5 -7 or approved equal. HP2 Same as HP1 except twin heads on 5" square x 25', 7 gauge steel light standard. • Gardco G182- 3XL- 250MH- 277- BRP- /SSS30 -5 -7 or approved equal. HW1 175 watt Metal Halide wall mounted sharp cutoff exterior wall luminaire. Formed steel or die cast aluminum housing. Tempered glass.lens. Baked enamel finish. Optical assembly shall be of specular aluminum with Alzak or equal fmish. lES Type II light distribution. Wet location listed. (1) HPF,magnetic ballast for use with (1) 175 watt lamp. * Gardco 101- WT- 175MH -WLU -STD FINISH- 277 -LP or approved equal. 2001 Nelson Electric, Inc. ///Design/Park 5 -405 Lum- Sched.doc Preliminary Lighting Plan - Specifications Page 2 oft I z • XI . Z re ' ~ a w W � U 0. U 0 LLI J = CO U- w rJ I.a = w z � �- 0 w w U O N 0 I- WW F0. u. O ..z w U = O F-. • z 1 Prepared for: COLLIERS REAL ESTATE TWO UNION SQUARE 601 UNION STREET, #5300 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: MICHAEL GEORGE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 THIRD COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2001 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy $744,660.00 (Residential Resale Rate) Extended Policy Proposed Insured: OPUS NORTHWEST LLC, A DELAWARE LLC 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in effective date hereof vested in: JOHANN POLLINGER AND HILDEGARD POLLINGER, LIVING TRUST U /T /A DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1993 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" Transnation No. 870144 Customer Reference: Escrow No. Seller Buyer /Borrower Pollinger Opus NW By For service on this order cal : (425) 646- 8589/1- 800 - 441 -7701 JOHN W. JONES, MARK S. NIKLASON, RANDY MC CRORY or J. JAY PUGH (FAX #(425) 646 -8593) Premium Tax Premium Tax said land is at the $1,348.00 $ 115.93 $ 578.00 $ 49.71 TRUSTEES OF THE POLINGER z w 0 O 0 co w J 1-- w0 w O I F- Z F. O Z 1- LLJ • 0 0 O N O I— wW H -- .. z w = . O ~ z LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Order No. 870144 TRACT 5 AND THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF TRACT 6 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1 (SR5) BY DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5484213 AND 5528319, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5561902; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest co be insured must be properly executed, delivered and z duly filed for record. i-z EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will cc w 2 contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are 6 ❑ disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. -I o A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, u) w if any, created, first appearing in the public records or -J F attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to u) IL. the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the Ui ui O . estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. g Q B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. = a I- Iii C. Special exceptions: zF 1-0 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW w ~ Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. 2D D As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is O N cil- iu 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, t together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure LI costs, if any, after delinquency: z (1st half delinquent, May 1; 2nd half delinquent, November 1) v Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance z .0178. 766160- 0061 -08 2001 $5,917.42 $2,958.71 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: 2414 Assessed Value Land: $342,000.00 Assessed Value Improvements: $ 69,000.00 3. INTENTIONALLY DELETED 4. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. To: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: SCHEDULE B Page 3 Order No. 870144 $2,958.71 $2,958.71 State of Washington August 20, 1962, August 27, 1962 and February 7, 1963 September 25, 1962, January 8, 1963 and March 27, 1963 5484213, 5528319 and 5561902 5. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: • TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Order No. 870144 Lawrence F. Warner and Rose E. Warner, husband and wife Safeco Title Insurance Company, a California corporation Johann Pollinger and Hildegard Pollinger, husband and wife 2659 South 150th, Seattle, Washington 98166 $260,000.00 February 18, 1981 February 20, 1981 8102200262 THE BENEFICIARY'S INTEREST IN THE ABOVE DEED OF TRUST MAY BE MERGED WITH THE LEGAL TITLE TO THE LAND. ANY SUCH MERGER SHOULD BE EVIDENCED BY A RECONVEYANCE OF THE DEED OF TRUST. Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owing with the appropriate lender /agency /individual. 6. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, ELECTRICITY, OR GARBAGE COLLECTION OR DISPOSAL, OR OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS DISCLOSED AS AN EXISTING LIEN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 7. Matters relating to questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor or material. An ALTA "as- built" survey must be furnished to this Company which shows the location of all improvements and reveals all encroachments, driveways and easements which encumber the property. We will review the survey and make an inspection of the premises, and will report the results of both the review and the inspection by supplemental report. NOTE 1: We are informed that Opus Northwest LLC is a Limited Liability Company (LLC). A copy of the duplicate original of the filed LLC Certificate of Formation, the LLC agreement, and all subsequent modifications or amendments must be submitted to the Company for review. NOTE 2: According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured(s) is /are Opus Northwest LLC, a Delaware LLC. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of said party (ies) . Page NOTE 3: The above captioned description may be incorrect, because the application for title insurance contained only an address and /or Parcel Number. Prior to closing, all parties to the transaction must verify the legal description. If further changes are necessary, notify the Company well before closing z so that those changes can be reviewed. Closing instructions cc 2 must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and D approved by all parties. -J o 0 NOTE 4: uu) w The tax assessor's records disclose the current property F_ address to be: u) u. 14910 51st Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 iii 0 NOTE 5: 5 The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description t''< on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID = d ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A I-W COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. ? H . F- O PTN TRACT 5 SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS VOL 6 PAGE 90 W uj NOTE 6: O D ea The Trust agreement under which the vestee holds title must be O - submitted to the Company for its review prior to closing. ww END OF EXCEPTIONS i- H —O Investigation should be made to determine if there w z are any service, installation, maintenance or U N construction charges for sewer, water, or f = � O electricity. z In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. msn Copies have been sent to the following: OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. 915 118TH AVE SE #300 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Attn: ANDY TABER JAMESON, BABBITT, STITES & LOMBARD 999 3RD AVE, #1900 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: DAVID LOMBARD CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES 4636 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #215 SEATTLE, WA 98134 Attn: MARCEL KHOUW Page 5 Order No. 870144 ,�7 x w• K +rr.• s.�.. ," ae w. ,!.:.t1S�. ' � ' 1 � L(�4.W+•4. :l(tL n# �Y`LH.�_"}.'�+� ' �+..: ,4 �iP: �� �Y# s nL12��WSLV4 L�11: F4�iL� .�.i�l�.�Y.3S �. �4�1'�t � �'Y _ .. _ .. ti • 1 .. 4 o 'r �g0 G� �•' ,. .: I P "1 I. .. ;y t i \ ..Z t y • :M M1 • `; .1 \ .I i ,r • • J S. ,s,s r s r. 5 7 •; • ES l ••• • ••i�••6 IZ 1 1 `. This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- c- oacnmenes, or location of boundaries. it is not a part of, nor does it modify, rice commitment or poiic to which it is amched. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. r'•.. �... �...• zrx_;_, �.w- ti?�. �,. r� �: �ti. :._...:.�;,..._.w :s�_.,_,...... .w_. ..._._....., :�r:r�` ..., •.....�:.:c: :w. wk5.: , ...... .........r.;. :� -ss ::;s:�:�?... CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1990 The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' lees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has br en recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of tire exorcise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became art insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. • 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attomeys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent That a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Data of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. SCHEDULE B STANDARD EXCEPTIONS SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under workmen's compensation acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formedy have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise, of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. 1004 -274A NORTHWEST REGION 1010 South 336th Street, Suite 215 Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 838 -1054 AGENCY OPERATIONS 320 108th Avenue, N.E., Suite 651 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 452-5353 TITLE AGENTS Washington Benton • Clallam • Clark • Cowlitz • Franklin Island • Jefferson • Lewis Pacific • Skagit • Yakima Oregon Benton • Curry • Deschutes • Jackson Klamath • Lane • Linn • Marion Polk • Umpqua • Yamhill t14 bR:Xh Y k COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY B 1004 -274A Transnation A LANDAMEAICA COMPANY 1 OFFICE: 101 Gateway Centre Parkway, Gateway One Richmond, Virginia 23235 -5153 z W JU 00 ND W H to � W 2 Q 2 a F Z F— I- 0 Z W W U 0 �_ O I— W 0 2 I— --- O W Z U = O~ z NORTHWEST REGION Washington Chelan - Douglas Counties 700 N. Mission Street, Wenatchee, WA 98807 (509) 662-4721 • King County 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 100 Park Place Building Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 628 -4650 . Kitsap County 9619 Levin Road N.W., Silverdale, WA 98383 (360) 692 -4556 • Okanogan County 715 Okoma Drive, Omak, WA 98841 (509) 422-3490 • Pierce County 6111 100th Street S.W. Lakewood, WA 98499 (253) 589 -1488 • Snohomish County 2939 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 (425) 252 -1156 • Spokane County North 720 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212 (509) 922 -2222 • Thurston County 3905 Martin Way East, Suite A, Olympia, WA 98506 (360) 459 -2331 Oregon Multnomah • Clackamus • Washington Counties 12360 East Burnside Portland, OR 97223 (503) 256 -7400 NORTHWEST REGION 1010 South 336th Street, Suite 215 Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 838 -1054 AGENCY OPERATIONS 320 108th Avenue, N.E., Suite 651 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 452-5353 TITLE AGENTS Washington Benton • Clallam • Clark • Cowlitz • Franklin Island • Jefferson • Lewis Pacific • Skagit • Yakima Oregon Benton • Curry • Deschutes • Jackson Klamath • Lane • Linn • Marion Polk • Umpqua • Yamhill t14 bR:Xh Y k COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY B 1004 -274A Transnation A LANDAMEAICA COMPANY 1 OFFICE: 101 Gateway Centre Parkway, Gateway One Richmond, Virginia 23235 -5153 z W JU 00 ND W H to � W 2 Q 2 a F Z F— I- 0 Z W W U 0 �_ O I— W 0 2 I— --- O W Z U = O~ z 1=• Commitment - WA Cover 01 -274 ISSUED BY TRANSNA'DON TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation A LANDAMERICA COMPANY meoeitini CITY OFTIIKWILA ZUJ1 PERMIT CENTER COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Transnation Title Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. A"� N U 4 ,1 i By: a \ HOOftPORAI� a y � p � 6 r . SfPL 16, 1992 Attest: Ot e 1� ` 0iz0N�m TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY cbt_tt 4a-,_/- a. aeaocA'Pe.„24,..e. President Secretary Div � {{ '` . "r�...:.�.v . 1 °.a-L f:. %y� - ,k,� P •r, � • S��.a a a 4 • • u?�Xr�' ue COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such know- ledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pur- suant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a 4. separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a. defect, lien or 5. encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, 6. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of P9, licy, but known to the insured claimant 1 not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured clair .or to the date the 7. insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (1) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD. ATTENTION n The next image may be a duplicate of the previous image. Please disregard previous image. Please disregard previous 2 images. Other: Please disregard previous 3 images. COMMITMENT CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such know- ledge. If the proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pur- suant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith, (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions, the Conditions and Stipulations, and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The matters listed below each policy form are expressly excluded from the coverage of that policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason thereof: AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a. defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of P21icy but known to the insured claimant 1 not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured clan ; or to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material); or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a result of the application of the doctrine of equitable subordination; or (c) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. "• °,�:t;w:�;; y,'e: i;�`J,�'" -'. �r,;: �kW`: L'".. YU± Kyi .%#'n;.n:.G,s:,:uci,.'k'r"r:, Prepared for: COLLIERS REAL ESTATE TWO UNION SQUARE 601 UNION STREET, #5300 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: MICHAEL GEORGE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 SECOND COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2001 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy $250,000.00 (Residential Resale Rate) Extended Policy Proposed Insured: OPUS NORTHWEST LLC., A DELAWARE LLC Transnation No. 870146 Customer Reference: Escrow No. Seller Buyer /Borrpwer Opus NW For service on this (425) 646- 8589/1 -800 JOHN W. JONES, MARK RANDY MC CRORY or J. (FAX #(425) 646 -8593 . Burns Premium Tax Premium Tax or ed call: -441 -7701 S. NIKLASON, JAY PUGH 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: SHEILA J. BURNS, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" $648.00 $ 55.73 $278.00 $ 23.91 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Order No. 870146 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 150 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE OF 199.25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. ........,. s ..... ..!..,J _.....�...............,..,.. k„ _"� .. .. x. ._+.....o... - ._.t::, .`L.o..- :....... • a.;.C,: y . y ,� '.` ' ..17r ... 1""'" " Page 2 SCHEDULE B 766160- 0030 -06 2001 $2,045.01 $1,022.51 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: 2414 Assessed Value Land: $69,000.00 Assessed Value Improvements: $73,000.00 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Page 3 Order No. 870146 REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. Z EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will I W contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are g disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. 6 U A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, coo if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to N the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this w Commitment. J B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. u C. Special exceptions: Z �. 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW z O Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. w w As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is N .0178. O- 0 I-- 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, x v ai together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure H costs, if any, after delinquency: u'0 (1st half delinquent, May 1; 2nd half delinquent, November 1) Wu U— Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 0 H $1,022.50 $1,022.50 PURPOSE: Roadway and utilities AREA AFFECTED: South 25 feet • RECORDING NO.: 6299225 Opt \ � PURPOSE: Ingress, egress and utilities AREA AFFECTED: South and East 25 feet RECORDING NO.: 8701270486 gj r s f � q. G � { - Gt CV:-. r r. ' ii -` 1 1 -7 3 • .1 crow T ;,ztir' z 5. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, e9"ress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. To: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: 6. DEED OF TRUST AND GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: State of Washington August 15, 1962 September 25, 1962 5484212 THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Sheila J. Burns, a single woman Chicago Title Insurance Company North American Mortgage Company 3883 Airway Dr., Santa Rosa, CA 95403 $85,000.00 November 17, 1997 November 26, 1997 9711261112 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owing with the appropriate lender /agency /individual. 7. The land described in this commitment appears to be residential in nature and may be subject to the provisions of R.C.W. 6.13.060 provided the land is occupied as a homestead. If the land is occupied as a homestead, all instruments conveyin9' or encumbering the land must be executed by each spouse, individually, or by an attorney -in -fact. 8. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, ELECTRICITY, OR GARBAGE COLLECTION OR DISPOSAL, OR OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS DISCLOSED AS AN EXISTING LIEN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 9. Matters relating to questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor or material. An ALTA "as- built" survey must be furnished to this Company which shows the location of all improvements and reveals all encroachments, driveways and easements which encumber the property. We will review the survey and make an inspection of the premises, and will report the results of both the review and the inspection by supplemental report. NOTE 1: We are informed that Opus Northwest LLC is a Limited Liability Company (LLC). A copy of the duplicate original of the filed LLC Certificate of Formation, the LLC agreement, and all subsequent modifications or amendments must be submitted to the Company for review. Page 4 Order No. 870146 NOTE 2: According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured(s) is/are Opus Northwest LLC, a Delaware LLC. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of said party(ies). Z NOTE 3: The above captioned description may be incorrect, because the application for title insurance contained only an address 6 v and /or Parcel Number. Prior to closing, all parties to the 00 transaction must verify the legal description. If further (no changes are necessary, notify the Company well before closing w w so that those changes can be reviewed. Closing instructions -' must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and N u- approved by all parties. w O NOTE 4: g The tax assessor's records disclose the current property u a address to be: w 14710 51st Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 = z'- NOTE 5: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description w on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID 2D ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A U COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. o 92 PTN TRACT 4 SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT VOL 6 PAGE 90 = 0 END OF EXCEPTIONS "I Z Investigation should be made to determine if there c are any service, installation, maintenance or 0 construction charges for sewer, water, or Z electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. msn Copies have been sent to the following: OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. 915 118TH AVE SE #300 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Attn: ANDY TABER JAMESON, BABBITT, STITES & LOMBARD 999 3RD AVE, #1900 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: DAVID LOMBARD CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES 4636 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #215 SEATTLE, WA 98134 Attn: MARCEL KHOUW Page 5 Order No. 870146 tn.v...itY!'M<. 3 .tivaT.:ALrik64w i1R106y1454 J .fe.:439CY to w w m NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. op 0 ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Transnation A LANDAMERICA COMPANY FteogiVt0 CITY CF TUKWILA PERMIT CENTER Transnation Title Insurance Company, an Arizona Corporation, herein called the Company, for a valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the exceptions and conditions and stipulations shown herein, the Exclusions from Coverage, the Schedule B exceptions, and the conditions and stipulations of the policy or policies requested. (See reverse side of this cover and inside of back cover for printed Exclusions from Coverage and Schedule B exceptions contained in various policy forms.) This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsements and is subject to the Conditions and Stipulations on the back of this cover. This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. NOTE: THE POLICY COMMITTED FOR MAY BE EXAMINED BY INQUIRY AT THE OFFICE WHICH ISSUED THE COMMITMENT, AND A SPECIMEN COPY OF THE POLICY FORM (OR FORMS) REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT WILL BE FURNISHED PROMPTLY UPON REQUEST. �,. - ::;.+ F:: �.' N' 2�- �� ; �� � LL '�:+. %"`.�A`i ?rv�i.:�i•�t'+:.:. _ }, `..k"y.�.i..y.. .. ,a ..: ;z. ?%{'. .:' �r� -. ,.,,...,�.� _./ t ,w.�.s -�rr.:�1:{ ",..r c.'4r��a';' i? •.ti yr.!ti. it'.'I.l p to rw4�:.'` ti-"r,< ,qtr:, -�a.' i ...r��t .:1�+iit`^:'. i ;i •- - rs� �isCS'�: >i:P A ,:t:,`.,,'_�,'.. ,5 � ti, r'i,Y t?;:. rt .,,(y. "� a ? =�'W i .,� +`'- ,�;?z4�; ` G #1 +.. ._,s , =R.tz ;:.r3�ii j.J..td. i+i..�t t+�. .+ ,cr.. +•:'�.!r1. SY.'...a= '�•.,.�,, i`t;4.i.r "xe r r 'tTx4 J ..�. r�s5.....�+..r- , Commitment - WA ���,:. .�- .r »:7v:' P• � h.. �t 7', Wit. ib. `f.� N- u. Cover Form 1004 -274 . ..'..i'.�"` w . 1:::: � � E � S �, By: , �Nt:ORPORAIEO f a a' 0 d SEPI 6, 1991 2o' e -- ,/ Attest: i `t� aR %�� +..,. I Z , V;1 , : - f TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY d4,40,A?e President Secretary Prepared for: COLLIERS REAL ESTATE TWO UNION SQUARE 601 UNION STREET, #5300 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: MICHAEL GEORGE TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 SECOND COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A EFFECTIVE DATE: August 14, 2001 at 8:00 A.M. 1. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount ALTA Owner's Policy $250,000.00 (Residential Resale Rate) Extended Policy Proposed Insured: OPUS NORTHWEST LLC., A DELAWARE LLC Transnation No. 870146 Customer Reference: Escrow No. Seller Burns Buyer /BorrRwer 0 u NW �1_ For service on this order call: (425) 646- 8589/1- 800 - 441 -7701 JOHN W. JONES, MARK S. NIKLASON, RANDY MC CRORY or J. JAY PUGH (FAX ##(425) 646 -8593) Premium Tax Premium Tax 2. Title to fee simple estate or interest in said land is at the effective date hereof vested in: SHEILA J. BURNS, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE 3. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" $648.00 $ 55.73 $278.00 $ 23.91 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Order No. 870146 THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 150 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE OF 199.25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. REQUIREMENTS. Instruments necessary to create the estate or interest to be insured must be properly executed, delivered and duly filed for record. z EXCEPTIONS. Schedule B of the policy or policies to be issued will = z contain exceptions to the following matters unless the same are a w disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company. QQ D J0 A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, o 0 if any, created, first appearing in the public records or w i attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to i the date the proposed Insured acquires for value of record the u) Li. estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this w 0 Commitment. 2 B. Standard exceptions set forth in inside of back cover. I u) d C . Special exceptions: i- _ zi- 1. Real Estate Excise Tax pursuant to the authority of RCW 1-0 Chapter 82.45 and subsequent amendments thereto. zf in As of the date herein, the tax rate for said property is v a 0 N. 0 I- 2. GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES and SERVICE CHARGES, as follows, = w together with interest, penalty and statutory foreclosure 1- U costs, if any, after delinquency: te (1st half delinquent, May 1; 2nd half delinquent, November 1) w z U= 0 ~ .0178. Tax Account No. Year Billed Paid Balance 766160- 0030 -06 2001 $2,045.01 $1,022.51 Total amount due, not including interest and penalty: Levy Code: 2414 Assessed Value Land: $69,000.00 Assessed Value Improvements: $73,000.00 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: Roadway and utilities AREA AFFECTED: South 25 feet '�� "t>. RECORDING NO.: 6299225 mpt Q 1 ts 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDING NO.: SCHEDULE B Page 3 $1,022.50 $1,022.50 Ingress, egress and utilities South and East 25 feet 8701270486 ,; fC1 ( �; °,e� 1'72 Order No. 870146 z To: Dated: Recorded: Recording No.: 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ADDRESS: LOAN NO.: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: State of Washington August 15, 1962 September 25, 1962 5484212 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: $85,000.00 November 17, 1997 November 26, 1997 9711261112 Page 4 Order No. 870146 5. RELINQUISHMENT OF ALL EASEMENTS existing, future or potential, for access, light, view and air, and all rights of ingress, egress and regress to, from and between the land and the highway or highways to be constructed on land conveyed by deed. Sheila J. Burns, a single woman Chicago Title Insurance Company North American Mortgage Company 3883 Airway Dr., Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owing with the appropriate lender /agency /individual. 7. The land described in this commitment appears to be residential in nature and may be subject to the provisions of R.C.W. 6.13.060 provided the land is occupied as a homestead. If the land is occupied as a homestead, all instruments conveying or encumbering the land must be executed by each spouse, individually, or by an attorney -in -fact. 8. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE OR CONSTRUCTION CHARGES FOR SEWER, WATER, ELECTRICITY, OR GARBAGE COLLECTION OR DISPOSAL, OR OTHER UTILITIES UNLESS DISCLOSED AS AN EXISTING LIEN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 9. Matters relating to questions of survey, rights of parties in possession, and unrecorded liens for labor or material. An ALTA "as- built" survey must be furnished to this Company which shows the location of all improvements and reveals all encroachments, driveways and easements which encumber the property. We will review the survey and make an inspection of the premises, and will report the results of both the review and the inspection by supplemental report. NOTE 1: We are informed that Opus Northwest LLC is a Limited Liability Company (LLC). A copy of the duplicate original of the filed LLC Certificate of Formation, the LLC agreement, and all subsequent modifications or amendments must be submitted to the Company for review. 1 NOTE 2: According to the application for title insurance, the proposed insured(s) is /are Opus Northwest LLC, a Delaware LLC. We find no pertinent matters of record against the name(s) of said party (ies) . NOTE 3: The above captioned description may be incorrect, because the application for title insurance contained only an address and /or Parcel Number. Prior to closing, all parties to the transaction must verify the legal description. If further changes are necessary, notify the Company well before closing so that those changes can be reviewed. Closing instructions must indicate that the legal description has been reviewed and approved by all parties. NOTE 4: The tax assessor's records disclose the current property address to be: 14710 51st Avenue S., Tukwila, WA 98168 NOTE 5: The following may be used as an abbreviated legal description on the documents to be recorded, per amended RCW 65.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WITHIN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT. PTN TRACT 4 SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT VOL 6 PAGE 90 msn Investigation should be made to determine if there are any service, installation, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, or electricity. In the event this transaction fails to close, a cancellation fee will be charged for services rendered in accordance with our rate schedule. Copies have been sent to the following: OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. 915 118TH AVE SE #300 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Attn: ANDY TABER JAMESON, BABBITT, STITES & LOMBARD 999 3RD AVE, #1900 SEATTLE, WA 98104 Attn: DAVID LOMBARD END OF EXCEPTIONS CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES 4636 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #215 SEATTLE, WA 98134 Attn: MARCEL KHOUW Page 5 I Order No. 870146 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. co ITN N CITY OF TUKWILA PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT REVIEW COMMENTS z I— W re 2 Project Name: Opus Northwest 6 0 � File #: E01 -018 w = Date: 09.19.01 f . W o Reviewer: L. Jill Mosqueda g co a W z � 1-O Z �_ Subject: Letter from Richard and Virginia Botham 0 0 U O - O H- W W 2 L I Public Works has the following response(s) to the letter dated 09.07.01: w z . U u) O ~ 1. Questions regarding the integrity of engineered retaining walls should be directed to the Building Department. Retaining wall footing drains also belong within the Building Department's purview. 2. This project is being reviewed for SEPA and Design Review. Only a cursory review of storm drainage is appropriate at this stage of the permitting. Storm drainage design can, and often does, change significantly from the proposed at this stage to the actual engineered designs at the development permitting stage. All surface water drainage design will meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM) requirements. The storm drainage will be designed by a registered civil engineer. All surface water drainage design will receive thorough technical review, by City engineers, during the development permitting stage. At that time the surface Projects /Opus /09.19.01 letter to neighbors 1 z water drainage design will be reviewed for concurrence with the current KCSWDM requirements. A complete report submitted by the developer's engineer will address the level of retention required. That report will also contain a complete account of the drainage onto and off of the site. At no time will the City knowingly approve a design which would cause water to backup onto another property. The City can honor your request to require Level 2 detention ONLY if the design and site conditions warrant that level of detention. 3. This question belongs to Building Department. 4. and 5. These two questions belong to Planning. 0 t2.0 .0 e ■AnzL--4.92 'AD \NV Projects /Opus /09.19.01 letter to neighbors 2 „ - (ONZO -11-1I LLST -R 0 m ARCHITECTS, P.S.C. ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIORS 919 124TH AVE N.E. SUITE 101 BELLEVUE, WA 98005 425.455.3203 425.455.9351 (FAX) vww.sconzohallstrom.com September 19, 2001 Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner CITY OF TUKWILA z DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 }- w Tukwila, WA 98188 ce QQ JU Re: Opus Park I -5 / 405 (Project file numbers L01 -050 and E01 -018) co w J = Dear Ms. Dhaliwal, w 0 I have reviewed your 8.16.01 letter requesting additional information and offer responses to the following items: I co 8. Design Review Comments: z I— 0 z I— a) Parking: 2 D, The primary parking lot design, as depicted on sheet P1.01, :0 utilizes 90° angle parking with 9' X 19' parking stalls and a 24' = W drive aisle for two -way traffic. Parking stalls at the perimeter of the parking lot and abutting the building are 17' deep with a 2' LI z overhang. The parking lot at the northwest corner of the site v U) utilizes 60° angle parking with 17' drive aisles for one -way o traffic. 184 parking stalls are provided. 55.2 (30 %) of the stalls can be sized for compact cars (8' X 16') and 29 are provided. Bicycle parking is provided outside, adjoining the sidewalk at the northeast corner of the building, as indicated on the Site Plan, sheet P1.01. Extruded concrete curb wheel stops are provided 2' from the end of all parking stalls at the perimeter of the parking lot. The edge of the concrete sidewalk forms the wheel stop for all parking stalls abutting the building. 6 accessible parking stalls are provided on the west side of the building, as indicated on the Site Plan, sheet P1.01. Minnie Dl. al 09/19/01 Page 2 of 3 b) Landscaping: The parking lot layout abutting the north and east property lines as indicated on the Site Plan, on sheet P1.01 typically includes area for a 2' vehicle overhang plus five feet of Type 1 z landscaping plus the retaining wall. re 2 . The interior parking lot landscaping as indicated on the Site v o Plan, sheet P1.01 exceeds the standards listed in TMC c 18.52.035(2)(c). The minimum interior parking lot landscape r- area required is 200 + (15 X 144) = 2,360 sq. ft. and 6,523 sq. w p f is provided. Every parking stall is less than 100' from an 2 interior parking lot landscape area that is 6' min. in any direction and more than 100 sq. ft. in area. I- w Z = c) Building Design: I-- O IA Ili The Exterior Elevations, sheets P4.01 and P4.02 include building facade modulation to provide interest and break the p — monotony. The modulation includes projections on all four sides of the building. In addition the ground floor windows on = c the east and west elevations are recessed. „ z A more prominent entrance has been added on both the east and west sides of the building as indicated on the Exterior p (— Elevations, sheets P4.01 and P4.02. z An outdoor seating / recreation area may be provided in the future near the southeast corner of the property abutting the parking lot. This location is more suitable for building tenants during work and lunch breaks and avoids congestion at the building entrances. The HVAC equipment will be located inside a rooftop enclosure formed by the parapet walls of the entrance projections and side walls as indicated on the Exterior Elevations, sheets P4.01 and P4.02. A colored concrete pedestrian path leading from 51 Avenue South to the building entrance is indicated on the Site Plan, sheet P1.01. Minnie DL �'al 09/19/01 Page 3 of 3 Because of the + / - 30' difference in existing grades from 51 Avenue South and the east property line abutting I -5, the lowest level of the building is "tucked" into the slope with access from the downhill (east) side only. Therefor, the entire west wall of the lowest level and a tapering wall on the north and south sides are retaining walls to support the grade transition. Building / Site sections A and B, on sheet P4.03 are provided to describe the retaining walls. The loading dock railing detail 1 is provided on sheet P4.03. Per UBC section 220 the lowest level of the proposed building is a story because the floor level directly above is more than 12' above grade on the east side of the building. Therefor, the proposed building is classified by the UBC as a 3 -story building. A recycling storage space is provided adjacent to the dumpster. Per TMC 18.52.080 the recycling storage space must be 65.6 X 2 = 131.2 sq. ft. minimum. The recycling storage space and dumpster enclosure walls are concrete to match the building exterior. e) Signage: The monument sign will be located in the landscape area, outside of the 40' vision triangle, as indicated on the Site Plan, sheet P1.01. The responsible consultants, in a separate letters, will address responses to items not included with this letter. If you should require any additional information while reviewing the plans, please call me at 425.455.3203. Sincerely, Sconzo Hallstrom Architects, P.S.C. G. Hallstrom, AIA cipal z .,_ w 6 J U 00 CO CO W - 1-• W 2 cn = a F W Z r0 Z F- w o cn o a o 1- WW I IL-O .z W • = o r- z Minnie Dhaliwal, Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 206 -431 -3670 or 206- 431 -3685 mdhaliwalnci.tukwvila. va.tis fax 206 -431 -3665 Re: Project L01 -05o, Ern-018 OPUS Project at 14910 - 51st Ave S - Tukwila Richard & Virginia Botham 1 6334 Linden Avenue North Shoreline, WA 98133 206 - 542 - 7793 botha m Pserv.net Owners of lots 2 9, 3 & 95 September 7, 2001 We have read the project file and are abutting Property owners of this project. We support reasonable development but have questions about several design issues within this project. 1. This project has several engineered retention walls along various property lines abutting our land. CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 1 0 2001 PERMIT CENTER a. High wall at the NW comer of Bums property When this retention wall is installed along the property line, we want assurances that our land will not be dug on, or disturbed. We do not want our land to slide downhill onto the project site during or after excavation /construction of the engineered retaining wall. b. Parking wall along E side of Burns .property and N side of Pollinger property Will this engineered retaining wall have seepholes that drain water from the development onto our property or will all water drainage from this project be directed into the project's surface water system. We request that all surface water drainage flow through the water cleaning detention vault underneath the parking lot, and then south (no north overflow during storms, please) into a developer created "stream" that flows into the south - flowing DOT ditch and not drain or overflow onto abutting properties. We are especially concerned these parking lot retention walls will act as drainage traps and channel water onto our property via seepage either under the walls or thru specific outlets left in the walls for just such a purpose. 2. This project has minimal surface water retention capacity (Level 1, not Level 2). If we have a 10 -year storm (very common: e.g. this past August's 2" in 24 hours), a 20 -year storm, a 50 -year storm or a 100 -year storm, where will all the excess stormwater overflow into the DOT ditch or onto abutting properties? Is it possible to require Level 2 stormwater detention for this project? • According to the file, this project is 77% impermeable surface (3.3 acres) and will provide Level 1 control standards for surface water. The file says it will meet the 1998 King County Surface Water Standards for 2 -year and 10 -year storms. The ditch that collects stormwater from ditches along 515' Ave South will be piped underground and released without cleaning into the DOT ditch on the west side of I -5. 3. This project adds an unusually large amount of fill and requires much re- shaping of the land contours. Will a sufficient bond be required to guarantee the continued reliability of the engineered retaining walls, guarantee to cover all correction and restoration costs associated any failures, and that NO drainage water will overflow onto our property? We own property [downhill, ] abutting the retaining walls. 4. Reading the file, I found staff comments indicating that parking stalls are undersized and an excess are for subcompacts; the parking stalls as configured do not meet Tukwila code requirements for size or mix. Additional parking is not available on 5151 Avenue South or anywhere else nearby. Please require adequate parking for this project. 5. Map C -1 has notes re easements and Map C -4 shows a 25 -foot wide utility /access easement along the south and east sides of Lot 3o. We would like guarantees from the City of Tukwila that this project will not be allowed until after the unresolved Roadway /Utility easements on Lot 30 have been solved. Lot 30 is included in this project; lots 29 and 31 are not included in the project and their roadway /utilities easement rights encumber Lot 30. These recorded easements provide for a free and unencumbered egress and access along a 25' wide corridor, as well as access directly onto 51st avenue S., at all times. The current plan does not abide by the easements' provisions. Sincerely, Map C -1 Topographic and Boundary Survey for OPUS PARK 5/405 says: 5. EASEMENTS; TWO EASEMENTS EXIST THAT AFFECT /ENCUMBER THE OVERALL PROPERTY AND BOTH AFFECT TAX LOT 0030. Richard & Virginia Botham i) A.F. 6299225, SOUTH 25 FEET FOR ROADWAY AND UTILITIES 2) A.F. 8701270486, SOUTH 25 FEET AND EAST 25 FEET FOR ROADEWAYAND UTILITIES THE BENEFITING PARCELS ARE TAX LOT 0029 AND TAX LOT 0031. IF THESE PARCELS WERE MERGED INTO TAX LOT 0630, THE EASEMENT WOULD BE EXTINGUISHED. This sketch is not based upon a survey of the pr,,pertu described in Order No. of `af ecO Title Insurance Company of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show a.{l roads or easements. The Com- posy assumes oo liability for inaccuracies therein. KI vv 4 .23 -4- 1 - tc) Tin r. too' f- It I 1 >U / rl /li"l Ibis sketrl is not based upon a survey of the pr'perry described in Order No. of 5 c:CC) Title Insurance Company of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show a ;l roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes so liability for inaccuracies therein. V L z 6r • ` 3� r 0 r M a.a.wnw..wKy,c- w..n...y..r.!w+ maw+wrwavxr.sau'sW. August 16. 2001 Andy Taber 915 118`" Ave SE Suite 300 Bellevue WA 98005 Dear Mr. Taber: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Notice of complete application and request for additional information for Opus Park I- 5/405 project. File numbers L01 -050 and E01 -018. w w U O 9 The Department of Community Development received your application to construct 65,600 0 I-- square feet building at 14910 51 Avenue South. Based on a review of your submittal relative to = 0 those requirements as set out in the Complete Application Checklists for Design Review and t= SEPA review. your applications are deemed complete. — z w U = O ~ Based on a review of your application for submittal requirements for Design Review and SEPA, your application is deemed complete as of August 16, 2001. Per Tukwila Municipal Code, a notice of land use application must be distributed within 14 days of this date. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site by August 30. 2001. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. Please call me to obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. At this time we have started code related review of your application and the following information is required to further process your applications: 1. A title report is required for both lots (tax lots 766160 -0030 and 766160-0061). The title report submitted with the application was for only one lot 766160 -0030. Also the title report should be not older than 30 days from the date of application. 2. Preliminary soil report was submitted. A complete geo- technical report is required. Please refer to the attached geotechnical report guidelines handout for details that need to be addressed as part of this report. 1 ).;00 .S bon t's Site =100 • Tukwila, 11•ashington Q8188 • Phone: 20o -- 131.30:0 • Fax: 200-131.3!2r l z � re w QQ � JU O 0 cn o J • = E- U) w w u_Q = a � �— 0 zi— z 3. Type 2 permit application (Special Permission Director) is required for the stream relocation and other wetland buffer intrusions. Refer to the attached application handout and Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section for 18.45.080 D for applicable code criteria. Application must include discussion on how the proposed project meets the code criteria for any work proposed in the sensitive areas or its buffers. 4. Boundary Line Adjustment application to consolidate the two lots (see attached). 5. Please explain in detail the proposed use of the building. The traffic impact analysis and SEPA checklist talk about one floor of the building to be light industrial use. However the property is zoned Office and light industrial is not a permitted use in that zone. 6. Sewer line is proposed to be micro- tunneled under the wetland buffer. Please explain why no other alternative location was selected. Also, are there easements on adjacent lots for this line? 7. SEPA comments: Following are comments pertaining to corresponding item in the checklist: A.11 Be more specific about the proposed use instead of stating the uses will be as permitted in the office zone. B.1 .e. Please provide more information about the grade and fill. This is required to fully understand the impacts associated with 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Also address the erosion and sedimentation impacts, truck/traffic impacts etc. The civil drawing must include site sections to illustrate existing and proposed grade and fill. B.3.a.1 &2. Since all three watercourses have been determined to be Type 3 regulated watercourses. all references to these features, as storm water runoff ditches is incorrect. 7.a.2 The soil report states "The individual performing the environmental review should be informed about the fill, particularly the old paint cans. Environmental review will likely require some level of sampling and testing of the fill to determine if regulated hazardous materials are present." Please clarify what additional studies were performed and if any approval was obtained or discussions were held with Department of Ecology. 8.k The checklist incorrectly states that property owners have been trying to obtain development approval for years. Prior to your application that was submitted on July 19, 2001. city did not receive any formal applications for this site. z i'- '~ w JU O 0 LUi w • o u_ Q I z � 1- 0 zr w w U w o s w O .z U = z 8. Design Review Comments: a) Parking: Please refer to the attached parking dimensions chart for the required dimensions of parking stalls and drive aisles. The two -way drive aisle must to 25 feet if the 90 degree parking stalls are 8.5'x19' and curb length is 8.5' and unit width is 63'. The drive aisle can be 24 feet if the 90 degree parking stalls are 9' x 19' and curb length of 9' and unit width of 62'. The site plan only shows 24' drive aisle and 8'x18' of parking stall. Also, only 30 percent of total parking stalls can be compact. Further bicycle parking must be provided. Refer to attached TMC 18.56.130, for development standards for bicycle parking. z 6 J0 00 CD CO Ill -I_ F- U) w u . cn = a z = z° w w U O - 0 H . Five feet of Type I landscaping is required along the entire north and east property lines. w Portion of this is missing where the retaining wall is proposed. v "-- O Interior parking lot landscaping must meet the standards listed in TMC I8.52.035(2)(c), i.e. . z a minimum of 200 square feet plus 15 square feet for each parking stall over 40. Also, per v TMC 18.52.035(4), landscape islands shall be placed at the ends of each interior row with p t' no stall more than 10 stalls or 100 feet from the landscape area. The minimum size of interior parking lot islands is 100 square feet and they must be minimum of 6 feet in any direction and generally the length of adjacent parking space. Also, a minimum of one evergreen or deciduous tree is required per landscape island with remaining area to contain a combination of shrubs, living groundcover and mulch. Also, per TMC 18.56.040, wheel stops must be provided two feet from the end of the stall of head -in parking. For the number of parking stalls shown, Table F of Washington Barrier Free Code requires six accessible stalls. b) Landscaping: The landscape plan also must include a note that all landscaped areas shall be covered by automatic irrigation system. The tree survey must indicate all trees that will be removed and also all sensitive areas and their buffers must be shown on that tree suvey. This is required per TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. c) Building Design: The entrance to the building must be made more prominent. 3 The long building facade must be modulated to provide some interest and break the monotony. 4, A pedestrian plaza could be incorporated near the building entrance. The plaza could include bicycle parking, benches for employees and planters etc. The HVAC equipment screen wall must be designed so that it is consistent with design of the primary structure. The choice of material should be such that it consistent with the proposed building. z The entire pedestrian path that leads from 51 Ave South to the entrance of the building w must be of concrete instead of striping on the asphalt. Colored concrete is preferred to 6 v highlight the entrance of the building. v o LU Please provide details of the retaining walls. Based on the information submitted at this time, it is not clear why retaining walls are proposed along the entire south side and along w o substantial portions on the north and west side. As stated earlier, site sections must be submitted along with retaining wall details. Site design must avoid long blank retaining walls. CO 1 w Provide a detail of the railing along the loading dock. z i Maximum allowed height in Office zone is 35 feet or 3 stories. Please provide w w documentation from your architect that it is considered a 3 -story building per Uniform v Building Code and not a two -story building with a basement. p in Recycling storage space must be provided to meet the minimum amount specified in TMC v 18.52.080. The architectural design of the screen wall must be consistent with the design of 11. the proposed building. w z U� d) Lighting Plan: z 1- Please provide a lighting plan that includes location and type of street and site lighting. Parking and loading areas must include lighting in scale and height of the associated structure. Refer to item #24 in the submittal checklist for details related to lighting plan. Also, refer to TMC 18.52.065 for additional lighting requirements. c) Signage: The location of the monument sign is within 40 -foot vision triangle. Please show the revised location. Please note that setback of the freestanding sign from the property line is equal to the height of the sign. The sign must be set in a landscaped area. 9. Public Works Comments: a) Traffic Impact analysis: See attached email from Cyndy Knighton dated August 13, 2001. b) Since the area is wet, underdrains in the parking area should be considered to reduce the potential of pavement failure. 4 c) The plan does not show water quality treatment, which is required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 10. Fire Department Comments: a) Four -inch fire line.is shown on the plans. It must be increased to 8 inches. b) Fire hydrant may be required around the perimeter of the building. Locations must be shown on the site plan We are still in the process of reviewing your wetland report and may have some additional comments regarding the wetland report and stream relocation and mitigation plan, which we will try and get to you by next week. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 206 - 431 -3685. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner Encl.: Geotechnical report guidelines handout Type 2 permit application handout- Special Permission Director TMC 18.45 Sensitive areas TMC 18.54 (Tree regulations) Boundary Line Adjustment application handout Ti'IC 18.56 Parking TMC 18.52 Landscaping /recycling /lighting Email from Cyndy Knighton- T1A comments KT AMA A :ELI STREET O WIMP •M4 •r • •0.0 IL. GTR. 04$*RL • 78.4 LIZ r • zoo' roe • ASSERT POLE 4— on Mt • TSLE I $ • WAIL MX • WATER IMTtR RATS VALVE • TYPE 8 CATOS INN • TYPE I CATCH BASS . • L MOLE • TEST PIT (TEMA • .TUT MOLE poLOBOMO 0 16 K8K.24DE OR M<ATO PROJECT AREA A (PER TRM4SIMTION TITLE REPORT NOS. 170144 MD 870144) THAT PORTION Of TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COPA4Y'S 5 ACM TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 4 OF PLATS, PACE SO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEOINNIMO AT THE INTERSECTION Of THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LIME Of PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY N0. I; THENCE WESTERLY ALCM SAID SOUTHERLY LIME ISO FEET TO THE TRUE POINT Cr BEGINNING; THE=M )I TTE1LY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LIME Of SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE Of 111.25 FEET; WESTERLY TO A POINT CM THE HEST LINE Of SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 PEET SOUTMRLT OF THE NORTHWEST COMER THEREON THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTIrEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 41 T)OCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF KOIININD; TOGETHER WITH TRACT 5 Of SEATTLE LAD COPMNY'S 5 ACRE TRACTS. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLULC 4 Of PLATS. PACE 40. RECORDS Cr KIM) C0.NTY; EXCEPT THAT PORTION DEEDED FOR PRIIMRY STATE HIGHWAY ID. I SR5 K DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 3464213 AND 5524318, LYING EASTERLY Of THE EASTERLY LINE OP PROPERTY 0CSCIRIKD IN DEED RICCRO(D UNDER RECORDING M0. 5641102; SITUATE IN THE CITY Of TUOVILA, COUNTY OP KING. STATE Of WASHINGTON. 60 30 • SCALE: r • so. 120 INCH (CWUH LIRE Of TRACTS 3 AND 4 Of SEATTLE LAW C ACIK TRACTS). THE IALAWE Of THE INTERIOR EAST -NEST LOT LIMES WERE PROM KTM(EN THE MOVE DESCRIBED LIME MO THE LINE CO MO4 TO TRACTS 7 AND 8 of SAID PLAT (WORTH IMROIM Of S). 151ST). THE OVERALL EAST BOUKLAI Y (SCSI RICHT- Of-WAY Of I-6) I1 WHOM PER SO METER SLIMY. UPON REVIEW Cr TM MOOT R1ONT - - RAY PLANS THIS LINE MAY MAME SLIGHTLY. THE METER -401/114 LINE BETWEEN TAX LOT 0011 AND 00113 is SUSJOLT TO VAR I ORS INTERPRETATIONS AS TO LOCATION. FURTHER RESEARCH AND EVALUATION MuLD K REQUIRED IN THE EVENT THAT A OEfiNITIVE LOGTION Of THIS INTERIOR LINE KOO•ICS CRITICAL. 3. EASOJENTS: TWO worm's EXIST THAT AFFECT/DC1ASER THE OVERALL PROPERTY NO MMTN AFFECT TAX LOT 0030. I) A.f. 4114225, soars 25 FEET NOR ROADWAY NO UTILITIES 2) A.F. 4701270444, SOUTH 25 PUT AND EAST 25 PUT FOR ROADWAY AID UTILITIES THE K14ITTINO PARCELS AM TAX LOT 0021 AND TAX LOT 0031. IF THESE PARCELS REM MOWED INTO TAX LOT 0030, THC EASEMENT TIG LD K EXT I MOU I SNNED. 8. EIONT TITLE REPORTS WERE RECEIVED FRCP TRAMSIMTI04 TITLE IH4SUIl'NCE COMPANY AND LVALUATCO AS VOUOWh, ObER / TAX LOT DATE Of REPORT I) 470148 0024 10/23/2000 0031 DIMS 2) 179144 0030 10/23/2000 3) 1170144 O COMMITMENT 004I 10/23/2C00 2/12/2000 PROJECT AREA A SUPPLEMENT I1 TO 214E Won TLEIT CO.4I T ENT 1 /1/200 4) 470143 0011 10/23/2000 5) 870142 0013 10/23/2000 1) 870141 0012 10/23/2000 7) 170131 0010 10 /23/2000 0014 0120 PROJECT AREA I 8) 170140 0121 10 /23/2000 I) NO REPORT 0205 NO REPORT summon /I TO 2T0 COMMENT THEM I TT ENT TO CODER #470144 ELIMINATED A PREVIOUS ACCESS EASEMENT PER A.F. 85555244 7. SETIAOS, DITCHES. AND/OR STREAMS M0114 HEREON WERE IDENTIFIED AO/OR DELINEATED BY A.J. IRLOKRO AND ASSOCIATES IN OCC(ML A 2000, AMD JANUARY 2001 AND SURVEYED BY GOLDSMITH l ASSOCIATES IN THE SANE PERIOD. PRELIMINARY WETLAND AND/OR STREAM OUWFEM ARE SHORN SASED ON INFORNTION PROVIDED IY THE WETLAND BIOLOGIST AM) IS SA.JCCT TO REVISION. 8. TOPOORRMIIC INFORMATION SHOWS NEMOI WAS COLLECTED IN THE FIELD ON JAMMRY 2001 AM) I1 CNMRE4T TO THAT DATE ONLY. P. SLOPES GREATER THAN OR EOUAL TO 10% AND GREATER THAN 10' IN HEIGHT ARE SHORN HEREON AS INTERPOLATED FROM A TRIMOULAR IRREGULAR ItTMORK Cr THE SITE TOPO. 10. PROJECT AREA A AND PROJECT AREA B POUQAR I E3 M( PRELIMINARY AND SUBJECT TO REVISION AS THE PROJECT PROCEEDS TO•1RD COHSTRUCTIXN. LLIALNISBMIlk PROJECT AREA B (PER TRMCHATION TITLE REPORT NOS. 170134 MD 170140) TRACT 7 or SEATTLE LAM COPMK'I 8 ACRE TRACTS. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLTAIC 4 Cr PLATS, PAGE S0, RECORDS Of KING CO_WTI; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDONED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 494243, FOR PRIMARY STATE HIO KAY NO. 11 SITUATE IN THE CITY Of TUOWILA, COUNTY Of KIND, STATE OP WASHINGTON. TOTAL IETLAND AREA PER BR[DKR• • ASSOC. • L4• ACTS OPUS N.W. L.L.C. . TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR .::})i Zin ,' '.. , `. "",,z �i�?.. ������.0 •.��k^y.y�"1..., .�T"a. :i.t.. .:+e'..`•r ^. KS ;'&ntih�r�xasa'h•rca.. ...�.. 0 Hugh C. Goldsmith • UAOrollInlcas • 1111 111■ Ir... II MU...,. TA 11004 P.O. M. 1.581 0•ff..Y i1 11001 & Associates. Inc. Sungon • Planners 1IIt 111 11 -IIR pox. 60) N 1111,. a.. bra,* Oen moss OSA. Am MA .<Y•• I • 100' •0•1 r•IP I.v1 S. .. w . ail •VSI Y,wF - nn0. INN T nr • nn. nr ory sr. • la MI 1.11 , •i er, KS, IMMO le 1.11. M1.n Y.31.1. I. • On•nw• � "e 11d� �r .'r1, . ,• w rl M :rain n• 1Y• Y f ..Or r . y_ i•,Or I�.�. nw FJ ••• 111. .-1 w 11.3 r W WY•,1r F11 1•.Yn, 1.1 Ylln/Id.. M Ma. 1 1 1 1 ; t:1: 4 4 - 1 - .; Ii t ; «.. r. w VI Zia I =II =4: %T r •••••1101 VMS KAMM 11 :^• II PO. •' W.f./ma II I 1 .1 1. fl • WAVY r1• • .... •1�Mn .. IMMM Al 1.14 11441 •IflW • 11 11.1114 6001 1N1/I• 51 MO a1 I6.41/1•r II MiF Se. 1N1/1a 11 , , 10,11.M. 1... W I .1 F MI., Me r iw<r a r40.1. aalg...¢.r::':•.1n •e. YF,.. 1•F Fnw. I .. MUM es.••1111 11.1 IS MKT IP 41.111... ,. 1w IMO IN u, -•,. to �•, , r•s Yw • .1 i1 w YR M1 n.Jiw Y ,r YI, I•n1Y•� rr11 • 1a =4. 111 1.1 a. •nir w rl ,n1 lw m•w•. , r. ,•rI r n• n•, •I M 1w1••f1.10.1 r M IM• 14. . i • •, F ti wn0• 0l1•.•• Ir.••p . . •111 t. . 144 Sm. 4, A 1101.41 ..M tatIZI:11%4111 • 141 •• SAM Mel •. • ...KA ,r nn Ma Y •, f WI. o wJ•• r I I ~ I n l*5 *n1 AM Ina 1 . r. Wu cool C. Imo s• w 0Frw1 1unJ ,r a.w'1 • b• nr.T, as q N• wm.M1 •• .w • ..• = 4.••• VO NMI WW r . wrw. WW1 I• (III a... O.M.. •w. 11.11 at - .•.1•., 001II 1111. ILC. "TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 .•C •T-• ■•• 0041 C -1 �t��`�a�i5i "L' [Y�u'•IaC W, /14 r ie'. �i.= n` T' n ^ YFn1Y:ShF ?= 1Mv'4..•..•ww.•�.. wx..•..�.- 1111....— ..•......... Z W ce JU 00 C0 0 W = J CO u_ wo u- j co d = F- w _ Z ZI- w W 0- 0F_ ww I F L •• LIB U 0 Z RECE !9 ED SEP 0 7 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Andy Taber OPUS Northwest, LLC 915 - 118 Avenue SE, Suite300 Bellevue WA 98005 Re: Opus Park 5/405 Dear Mr. Taber: J. RICHARD ARAMBURU JEFFREY M. EUSTIS Attorneys at Law 505 Madison Street, Suite 209 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625 -9515 Fax: (206) 682 -1376 September 6, 2001 This office represents Richard and Ginger Botham, the owners of Tax Lots 29 and 31 within Tract 4, Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts. These tax parcels abut to the north and the northeast property upon which your firm is proposing construction of an office park. The proposed office park site includes Tax Lot 30 of Tract 4. As you are aware, Tax Lot 30 is traversed along its southerly boundary by a 25 -foot easement which is appurtenant to the Bothams' Tax Lot 31. Additionally, a 25 -foot easement traverses the southerly and easterly boundaries of lot 30 which is appurtenant to Bothams' Tax Lot 29. The topographic and boundary survey prepared by Goldsmith & Associates discloses these two easements. See sheet C -1. Your proposal designates the easement areas as parking spaces, aisles and related structures. These proposed improvements interfere with the Bothams' right for use of the easement for access. Even though the easements are not currently improved, permanent obstructions would interfere with the Bothams' rights to their use. There is continued interest in the development of the Botham property, for which the easements would be necessary. Moreover, your construction of permanent, legally required parking upon the easements would likely preclude the removal of parking stalls and structures in the future to allow for improvement of the access easement. Accordingly, the Bothams regard the proposed parking spaces, aisles and related structures as an interference MICRO COM SYSTEMS LTD. ATTENTION (l The next image may be a duplicate of the previous image. Please disregard previous image. Please disregard previous 2 images. n Pleas disregard previous 3 images. E F IA n Other: r i NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN • THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. A 7 RECEWED SEP 0 7 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT J. Andy Taber OPUS Northwest, LLC 915 - 118 Avenue SE, Suite300 Bellevue WA 98005 Re: Opus Park 5/405 Dear Mr. Taber: RICHARD ARAMBURU JEFFREY M. EUSTIS Attorneys at Law 505 Madison Street, Suite 209 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 625 -9515 Fax: (206) 682 -1376 September 6, 2001 This office represents Richard and Ginger Botham, the owners of Tax Lots 29 and 31 within Tract 4, Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts. These tax parcels abut to the north and the northeast property upon which your firm is proposing construction of an office park. The proposed office park site includes Tax Lot 30 of Tract 4. As you are aware, Tax Lot 30 is traversed along its southerly boundary by a 25 -foot easement which is appurtenant to the Bothams' Tax Lot 31. Additionally, a 25 -foot easement traverses the southerly and easterly boundaries of lot 30 which is appurtenant to Bothams' Tax Lot 29. The topographic and boundary survey prepared by Goldsmith & Associates discloses these two easements. See sheet C -1. Your proposal designates the easement areas as parking spaces, aisles and related structures. These proposed improvements interfere with the Bothams' right for use of the easement for access. Even though the easements are not currently improved, permanent obstructions would interfere with the Bothams' rights to their use. There is continued interest in the development of the Botham property, for which the easements would be necessary. Moreover, your construction of permanent, legally required parking upon the easements would likely preclude the removal of parking stalls and structures in the future to allow for improvement of the access easement. Accordingly, the Bothams regard the proposed parking spaces, aisles and related structures as an interference .ruiz.tL- .ESSr3f;.• ... W September 6, 2001 Page 2 with their easement rights which they are prepared to take legal action to prevent. The Bothams insist that permanent parking spaces and structures not be placed over their easements. If you propose alternative means to resolve this conflict, you may contact the Bothams through this office. By copy of this letter we are providing notice of this potential encroachment to the underlying property owners and to the City of Tukwila. Thank you for your attention to this matter. JME/py cc: Richard and Virginia Botham Minnie Dhaliwall Sheila Burns Johann Polinger i' cerely, I I s Minnie Dhaliwal - Re: Thank you for yo' From: Minnie Dhaliwal To: Ginger Botham Date: 8/30/01 1:59PM Subject: Re: Thank you for your help The following addresses are on file: Sheila Burns 14710 -51st Ave S, Tukwila WA 206 - 246 -7392 Johann Pollinger P.O.Box 426 Grapeview WA 98546 360- 275 -9518 Let me know if you need any additional information Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila 206 -431 -3685 »> Ginger Botham <botham @serv.net> 08/30/01 01:49PM »> Re: OPUS project @ 14910- 51st Ave S - Tukwila L01 -050 & E01 -018 Minnie: Thank you for all your help today. I waded through a lot of paper and feel I am beginning to understand a very sophisticated project. You were an enormous help. I need to ask for a little bit more help. When I got home I discovered that I don't have addresses for Johann Pollinger and Shiela Burns, the owners of the two lots being developed. Please e-mail or phone with their addresses. botham(cserv.net 206 - 542 -7793 Ginger & Ric Botham Page 1 ... 'W. ^[:.dam: ^k �• -• ^.':i12::e .: �:o Hic: a:�V.d.i��� .?dM�n -t �:. .... Dept. Of Community Development . City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I , T ESL ! Z_, HEREBY DECLARE THAT: • Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Project Name: opus Afkl Notice of Public Meeting Project Number: Lo--a50 (� p,v1 �) EOf"o/ Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Mailer's Signature: latd_______, i Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Person requesting mailing: A-4 6 Rl`lO L Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda I1 Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 -- Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 07V/day o f ,4(L? in the year 20 Of P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM • Project Name: opus Afkl Project Number: Lo--a50 (� p,v1 �) EOf"o/ awn) Mailer's Signature: latd_______, i Person requesting mailing: A-4 6 Rl`lO L Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 07V/day o f ,4(L? in the year 20 Of P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: City of Tukwila NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED AUGUST 27, 2001 OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT July 19, 2001 August 16, 2001 August 27, 2001 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: Opus NW, L.L.C. LOCATION: 14910 -51 Ave South OWNER OF THE PROPERTY: Shiela Burns and Johann Pollinger FILE NUMBERS: L01 -050 (Design Review), E01 -018 (SEPA) PROPOSAL: To construct 65,600 square foot office building along with associated parking and other site improvements. The proposed building is a three level building and two truck docks are proposed on either side of the building. A type 3 watercourse is proposed to be piped. OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Type 2 Special Permission Director Boundary Line Adjustment Development Permit These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development. Comments regarding the State Environmental Protection Act Permit (E01 -018) and regarding Design Review permit (L01 -050) are due by 5:00 p.m. on September 10, 2001. If you have questions about this proposal contact Minnie Dhaliwal, the Planner in charge of this file, at (206) 431 -3685. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision on this project or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department of Community Development at 206 -431 -3670. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 2064131 -3665 a, <.:::vr: �4 e:ixtl 0 100 200 I" = 200' 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Fagineers Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th Avenue SE Bellevue. VA D8004 P.O. Box 2.565 Bellevue. WA 98009 TEL 425 402 -1080 TAX (425) 402 -7719 S. 148TH ST PLOTTED: 0O112E08.dvq RNIX 04/23/01 1122 SCALE: 1• • 200' DATE: Apr 09. 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED: APPROVED: ACAD DWG.: 00112E08 VIEW: XREF: LSF: FLD BK: PG #: PSSF: SITE 300' LOT LINE IDENT. OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON JOB NO: 00112 SHEET 61411.0 .111.1.11 ner .0210.2 •Cat Itrtat 1d 3119 .421274/W/13661 6 0 S .._.. ,--• G atw1I 1 IS .41,- r11 1.0tt fr .0-.0i • .1 .2173.ii N71fiig iiIl YJ 1111..1-.1 ranos 3nNaAv lG 4.2 a t v is - c - 4 1 - 141 .1r1,06. NUT.. v.1 • .2.1•0•Lt • •••••••:• .13.403.11.••••••-• 24.. • Trt• • 422.4 • 7122•al 12.21 .2,4 • 2•21 12•31 .1•2•It • .1 1.11 V. VW 1.12•21•11.• 12/ 22••••2 rt 0 2 ViVCI 122t !I - - ----- - - •111 la SCINV 11311 — 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. ., . 1 . 2 , • .T : . .*b .'''i■ '' ei. ,-• 11 .ri ' •.: :.!:- 0-4 . ' • A fe' : , - • ..,,....._, , 1, .. i'.- itlil• 1 fl" • : . 61411.0 .111.1.11 ner .0210.2 •Cat Itrtat 1d 3119 .421274/W/13661 6 0 S .._.. ,--• G atw1I 1 IS .41,- r11 1.0tt fr .0-.0i • .1 .2173.ii N71fiig iiIl YJ 1111..1-.1 ranos 3nNaAv lG 4.2 a t v is - c - 4 1 - 141 .1r1,06. NUT.. v.1 • .2.1•0•Lt • •••••••:• .13.403.11.••••••-• 24.. • Trt• • 422.4 • 7122•al 12.21 .2,4 • 2•21 12•31 .1•2•It • .1 1.11 V. VW 1.12•21•11.• 12/ 22••••2 rt 0 2 ViVCI 122t !I - - ----- - - •111 la SCINV 11311 — 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. -0 an. o Pam J.P2...1. - AA. M■11tAa. -C) MAR IAD. TATA. 11.-AAR 11 VI% „ - OCALA- M • I•11. II — AIM ----- 61A/COLAL -0 Anoorlar..0.• EAT ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 11 -C) en. co., MAR hOw .ALMA 0 -0 AncAocurr.0. IM•SAL AIWA -0 rc -0 orucncirr. oa••••4e Lao COLOR LEGEND ALL COLOR M rtoar,luneo ST ARP.. •AlLIARA TOAIMAMI to. Mtm MGOARA adasa 0 ...WAN .AVM _VGA -020 . ACA I-„ + 1•••••• ARA. NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. SCONI utafti ,ALKICCIS PSC MAIM AA •AM ••1 ma au •••• u•••••• F PREL1111HARY ELEVATICH6 AMA AC1. lac•••••••■• DMA.. LP PAO. .AA• pArs. AAAve• P4.01 TO: Mayor Mullet 2. CITY OF TUKWILA INTER - OFFICE MEMO FROM: Steve Lancaster.__.__` . - ' v SUBJECT: Opus development proposal on 51 Av So DATE: August 27, 2001 Please let me know if you have additional questions. Cc: City Council Q: \STEVE\DEVEL \OPUS51 \Opus51 status010827.doc I understand property owners in the vicinity of the Opus development proposal have contacted you recently. The following information is provided for your background. 1. We have succeeded in resolving the discrepancies between Opus's initial wetland study and our peer review. Their consultants and our consultants are now in general agreement concerning the extent and nature of wetlands in the area. While the extent of wetlands is greater than originally found by Opus's consultant, most of the additional wetland area is Type 3 wetland, which can be filled or otherwise altered if mitigated. Changes to the wetland information originally submitted by Opus have not resulted in significant new areas that cannot be developed. In other words, Opus was aware of the development limitations of the property before they initiated development discussions with the City, and the extent of these limitations has not changed significantly. 3. Opus has now submitted a formal development proposal, involving only a portion of the property they originally investigated. We are informed they have a tenant lined up. This proposal is for one three story office building and associated parking. A site plan for the current proposal and a drawing of the larger area showing its location are attached. The larger drawing also shows the general "agreed -to" location of Type 2 wetlands (those that cannot be filled under our SAO). 4. While Opus has not submitted any formal plans for the remainder of the property, they have recently inquired about the ability to place a hotel here (for your information, the zoning code does not allow hotels in "0" Office zoned areas such as this). It appears that their interest in buying this additional property will be related to whether or not they have a tenant "in hand," which is certainly a typical approach to development of this nature. Page : 10 :.;.i t•I'V la IIg .1207111141132icl 0 - u C )5d S1,3 M. NT W04131 13111 01110) carlr it arn C' ..13/011 .01 .03 ,Sk FU ii 1I1l7d • ./ .3 rr • - i ...- i fl ,,•• _ 0 0 ,,J1 i ; ...._ .•.• Or i . • - 7,-....:•:- If - ,1.. T1 .„..".,.,..t / .. _ • rriTrfrm_ 1,1:1-11.,1111 . MiflO 2n112A.7 t I - - ' • . 1 ., _:•,1131 I ■ I ,-• - i I ■ : .. ._.. 8 0 .1 ' I."- - :, , . ,?,.. ‘,/ ::■-- -- 1 . • '-'7''''.--'7..'-'-'' I 5 ‘ > ....- - i 1' 1 : • / __ ■ " ...... <'/ . VI ITI 1 ! - _ ,,,...,..,. \ 1 1 ,.,../.:.).:.. , r... 711..i.,:.•1.1 .1.1.14.1..1„114.1..i..1:f ..,........, 1 ..„. i_.._ .._.._.._..........„•.__..._i ‘• • ..,......, . .,.,`•":;,... l• . • •'..'' •••, I i e cC"e` -. x • I. I • - - - - - - - - - - "11' - ..--e• .•:...•■•-: t-'1.": v Ne' ''', )•• '' - :`, 7 4 7 1 1 ".." , .. / :.'..'c ',.Y,'• 't '• ' ' • • fr"V1 11; 17, • , ( 1111-1.1,11-1.4.1.1s14 - . I s. I 7. • t . - - - - - - - - • • L ..- , ... .:•.' ' ' t : \; - / . .":. 7 ..... 7 %;‘ , , , ,.. ,,...-.... Jr• .:- ...'.:7-1.. .• ..,•-..7,< .. • gal 17 - 1.1. 9 • ? NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • • •• • • • • • • -• SOV/S N8Vd a • z / ;:,..3..?ii i•?94d4i'g Ito . t : I ,; 7;1'.,:h';'•c• ctc;:';', ' :-.. ::... ....P / • 41. ..-.:: . .:(.. :J.. ;.:Y.•'; ' e ",, ..:• 'J. .., 10 :.;.i t•I'V la IIg .1207111141132icl 0 - u C )5d S1,3 M. NT W04131 13111 01110) carlr it arn C' ..13/011 .01 .03 ,Sk FU ii 1I1l7d • ./ .3 rr • - i ...- i fl ,,•• _ 0 0 ,,J1 i ; ...._ .•.• Or i . • - 7,-....:•:- If - ,1.. T1 .„..".,.,..t / .. _ • rriTrfrm_ 1,1:1-11.,1111 . MiflO 2n112A.7 t I - - ' • . 1 ., _:•,1131 I ■ I ,-• - i I ■ : .. ._.. 8 0 .1 ' I."- - :, , . ,?,.. ‘,/ ::■-- -- 1 . • '-'7''''.--'7..'-'-'' I 5 ‘ > ....- - i 1' 1 : • / __ ■ " ...... <'/ . VI ITI 1 ! - _ ,,,...,..,. \ 1 1 ,.,../.:.).:.. , r... 711..i.,:.•1.1 .1.1.14.1..1„114.1..i..1:f ..,........, 1 ..„. i_.._ .._.._.._..........„•.__..._i ‘• • ..,......, . .,.,`•":;,... l• . • •'..'' •••, I i e cC"e` -. x • I. I • - - - - - - - - - - "11' - ..--e• .•:...•■•-: t-'1.": v Ne' ''', )•• '' - :`, 7 4 7 1 1 ".." , .. / :.'..'c ',.Y,'• 't '• ' ' • • fr"V1 11; 17, • , ( 1111-1.1,11-1.4.1.1s14 - . I s. I 7. • t . - - - - - - - - • • L ..- , ... .:•.' ' ' t : \; - / . .":. 7 ..... 7 %;‘ , , , ,.. ,,...-.... Jr• .:- ...'.:7-1.. .• ..,•-..7,< .. • gal 17 - 1.1. 9 • ? NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. • • •• • • • • • • -• SOV/S N8Vd August 27, 2001 To: Tukwila City Council: P. Carter, J. Duffy, D. Fenton, J. Fernandez, J. Haggerton, P. Linder, R. Simpson CC: Mayor S. Mullet Do you remember those folks who own property along 51 Ave. S. with the wetlands issue; and with the city discharging water onto private property. They are the ones whose property was not wetland until long after the freeway was built. They are the ones who were told that the Utilities Committee would look into the problem and would try to work out a solution acceptable to all parties. Of course nothing ever came out of Committee and the property owners were never contacted by the Committee. Yes, these are the folks who were told that the city would like to see the property developed, and that the city felt it was wrong to be discharging water on private property, and who were told that you understood that their retirement was being ruined by reducing the developable land to fifty percent, or less, for five of the eight owners. Well six of the owners have now been told by the developer, OPUS, who has spent substantial money trying to make this project happen, that NO CONTRACTS will be offered, because OPUS doesn't want to waste more money on more planning, when contracts based on the developable portions would probably be rejected by the owners. The council members have said that they would like to help but that they can't do anything because of existing ordinances; and that the council members should, therefore, not be blamed for our loss or their inaction. Now let us make our position clear. There are at least two things that can be done if the council is not just making empty talk about wanting to help. fiRST: Stop discharging water onto our property, immediately. If you are at all interested in what is right and fair, not just in what the city can get away with; you can show that you agree that it is not right to impact our property when other property in the city has the benefit of storm sewers. It does not matter if the staff is right or wrong regarding the effect on the wetlands produced by stopping the discharge of the water. What matters is that we should not be so adversely impacted. SECOND: If all the good words are not just hot air, then the council can offer to buy the wetland portions of the properties. If the owners were able to receive a fair price for the portion of the property that has been rendered wet through the action and inaction of the city and the state; we would be able to accept a contract offer from a developer, based on the developable portion. The council cannot claim that these actions are beyond the scope of council powers. Therefore, we want you to understand that yes, we will hold the council members accountable for what we consider to be a most unfair.and damaging situation. Of course, we feel victimized. The wetlands were created by government agencies; the same — government agencies that are supposed to protect our property rights. Further, you may be sure that, with our retirements on the line, we will be most active in coming elections; investing our time and money to try to obtain council members who might not just talk sweetly. Now, other council members might not help our situation; but AT LEAST THEY MIGHT, which is much more than we have gotten from the present council. We would very much appreciate the courtesy of a response to our requests. We need relief and we need it promptly. Sincerely Yours; Dwayne F. Hayes Ruth I. Hayes 16634 53 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 State of Washington County of King City. of Tukwila I pY J A4?)R►ie.. (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on 2.7 • Q i the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 149' 10 • 516T AYE . , so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary' vehicular access to the property for application file number Lf ► - C O I herewith. authorize the City of Tukwila or its representative to remove and . ediately di . os - , f the sign at the property owner's expense, if not removed in a timely manner or within fourt - - , (14) . ays a '4 . tice letter. On this day personally appeared before me ,4.0s (A- g r. individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7 CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E- mail: tukplan(a.ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) day of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of residing at My commission expires on � pplic for rroject Manager's Signature Z. to me known to be the that he /she signed the same as his/her ZOO s ington d L,U /-�— Z ~ W Ce J U O 0 tn co w J = • LL w 2 QQ LLQ co w Z � I— 0 Z • w U 0 w 1— IL. w z ( 22 0 z MEMORANDUM TO: Minnie Dhaliwal, Associate Planner Jack Pace, Planning Manager Wetland/Watercourse City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist DATE: August 27, 2001 RE: Opus Park Office Building: Wetland/Watercourse Review - Permit #'s E01 -018 & LO1 -051. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Per your request, I have reviewed the initial submittal for the Opus Northwest project — Opus Park 5/405 located along the east side of 51 Avenue S. The submittal includes a preliminary geotechnical report (Terra Associates, Inc. 11/15/00), wetland report, and watercourse mitigation concept letter (A.J.Brederg, B& A Inc.). In addition to the plan submittal for site design, there is a preliminary Landscape Plan. Comments for SEPA review have been sent to the applicant (Community Development Letter, 8/16/01). My technical review comments are listed as follows: 1) The current project of a proposed 3 -story office building, Opus Park, requires a wetland/ watercourse study to document the work that has occurred. The original wetland report is not complete. A new or revised wetland report is required to reflect the project and associated wetlands including the wetland delineation and determination of watercourses on the subject property. The mitigation for piping the north drainage and modifying the drainage on the southwest corner can be presented as a conceptual plan. This information is required to complete the SEPA review and determination. 2) The project site plan labeling should include wetland and watercourse ratings and standard buffers as follows: The I -5 drainage watercourse is a Type 2 with a 35 -foot buffer. All of the watercourses on the site are Type 3 with a 15 -foot buffer. The southern wetland just off -site is a Type 2 with a 50 -foot buffer. The northern wetland is a Type 3 with a 25 -foot buffer. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Opus Park Review Memo August 27, 2001 Page 2 Cc: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director Jill Mosqueda, Associate Engineer 3) The north watercourse needs to be shown on at least one of the site plan drawings to clearly show its location relative to proposed development. This mapping will demonstrate the difficulty with retaining it as an open channel. z 1 z �w QQ J U 00 (3 , w= J H 4) u) w w If the stormwater drainage system design allows, the watercourse mitigation area should also be 2 considered for water quality improvement functions. We can permit a dual use of this area if it 1 5 replaces the open watercourse to be piped. There is a significant area being shown as just u groundcover plantings (salal) within the lower, southwest area of the "open space" that could be z w utilized for water quality. z 1 1— 0 In addition, the watercourse that crosses the southwest corner would be piped to facilitate the new w w driveway. The area would be regraded and approximately 40 feet of this watercourse piped. Even D o though the area is shown with new landscaping, the piping mitigation will also be replaced in the 8 cn "open space" area. o ►-- w 5) LL _ Some existing vegetation in the new watercourse area is native (Pacific willow trees) and should be z retained if possible. All new plantings in the mitigation "open space" area will be native to the v N region. 0 � z August 21, 2001 Andy Taber Opus Northwest L.L.C. 915- 118 Avenue SE #300 Bellevue WA 98004 Dear Mr. Taber: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Legal lot status for Rochon's property (tax lot numbers 766160 -0090, -0094, - 0120). We have reviewed the documentation you submitted regarding the three tax lots referenced above. Based on review of that documentation and Tukwila Municipal Code, it is determined that they are separate legal lots. Two of the parcels of property are remnants of what was once one larger platted lot. When I -5 was constructed Washington State Department of Transportation acquired the balance of these two lots. The two remnants owned by Rochons are legally described as: The North 1/2 of the South 1/2 of Tract 6 (except the westerly 283 feet and except the portion deeded for highway purposes) of Seattle Land Company's 5 acre Tracts. The South '/2 of the South 1/2 of Tract 6 (except the westerly 283 feet and except the portion deeded for highway purposes) of Seattle Land Company's 5 acre Tracts. The third parcel, which was created in 1967 is Lot 7 (except West 300 and except the portion deeded for highway purposes) of Seattle Land Company's 5 acre Tracts. Page I of 2 Steven M Mullet, Mayor There was some concern about whether these lots could be sold separately, or whether two or more parcels had to be considered as a single lot for purposes of sale. Although creation of these parcels would require a short plat under current regulations, the fact that all three were created prior to the effective date (1972) of modern short plat regulations means they are exempt form the requirements for a short plat (RCW 58.17.040). This means that the sites are, for purposes of application of zoning rules, separate lots. That also means that current owners are free to sell them individually or in some combined group. A word of caution is necessary and very important- the fact that the parcels are "lots" and can be separately sold does not necessarily mean they are buildable. In order to be buildable lots, each parcel would need to have legal access to a public street, be served by water and sewage disposal systems meeting applicable code requirements and meet zoning code standards for setbacks and 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 z w o! L 0O co CO 111 J CO u_ w 0 • a = w z � �-- to O • � O - o � w w' "-- O .. w 0 O E 2 lot coverage, critical area standards and other typical code requirements required of any building permit application. Since some of these standards vary depending on the specific use that is proposed for a lot and specific physical characteristics of the property, it is not possible to determine at this time to what extent any or all of these lots may be buildable. That determination can only be made when a specific use is proposed by means of a permit application. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please call Jack Pace, Planning Manager at 206 - 431 -3686. Sincerely, Steve Lancaster Director Community Development C: Daniel & Jeanine Rochon Raymond & Iola Hayward Page 2 of 2 August 16, 2001 Andy Taber 915 118` Ave SE Suite 300 Bellevue WA 98005 Dear Mr. Taber: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Re: Notice of complete application and request for additional information for Opus Park I -5/405 project. File numbers L01 -050 and E01 -018. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor The Department of Community Development received your application to construct 65,600 square feet building at 14910 51 Avenue South. Based on a review of your submittal relative to those requirements as set out in the Complete Application Checklists for Design Review and SEPA review, your applications are deemed complete. Based on a review of your application for submittal requirements for Design Review and SEPA, your application is deemed complete as of August 16, 2001. Per Tukwila Municipal Code, a notice of land use application must be distributed within 14 days of this date. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site by August 30, 2001. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. Please call me to obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. At this time we have started code related review of your application and the following information is required to further process your applications: 1. A title report is required for both lots (tax lots 766160 -0030 and 766160 - 0061). The title report submitted with the application was for only one lot 766160 -0030. Also the title report should be not older than 30 days from the date of application. 2. Preliminary soil report was submitted. A complete geo- teclmical report is required. Please refer to the attached geotechnical report guidelines handout for details that need to be addressed as part of this report. 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 3. Type 2 permit application (Special Permission Director) is required for the stream relocation and other wetland buffer intrusions. Refer to the attached application handout and Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Section for 18.45.080 D for applicable code criteria. Application must include discussion on how the proposed project meets the code criteria for any work proposed in the sensitive areas or its buffers. z z w • 2 JU O 0 � 0 w J H w 6. Sewer line is proposed to be micro - tunneled under the wetland buffer. Please explain why no g other alternative location was selected. Also, are there easements on adjacent lots for this line? � < 7. SEPA comments: Following are comments pertaining to corresponding item in the checklist: z '- t-o z �- A.11 Be more specific about the proposed use instead of stating the uses will be 2 in U � O ( 12 • F- B.1.e. Please provide more information about the grade and fill. This is required w w to fully understand the impacts associated with 20,000 cubic yards of fill. Also t address the erosion and sedimentation impacts, truck/traffic impacts etc. The civil drawing must include site sections to illustrate existing and proposed grade and fill. w 0 4. Boundary Line Adjustment application to consolidate the two lots (see attached), 5. Please explain in detail the proposed use of the building. The traffic impact analysis and SEPA checklist talk about one floor of the building to be light industrial use. However the property is zoned Office and light industrial is not a permitted use in that zone. as permitted in the office zone. B.3.a.1 &2. Since all three watercourses have been determined to be Type 3 regulated watercourses, all references to these features, as storm water runoff ditches is incorrect. 7.a.2 The soil report states "The individual performing the environmental review should be informed about the fill, particularly the old paint cans. Environmental review will likely require some level of sampling and testing of the fill to determine if regulated hazardous materials are present." Please clarify what additional studies were performed and if any approval was obtained or discussions were held with Department of Ecology. 8.k The checklist incorrectly states that property owners have been trying to obtain development approval for years. Prior to your application that was submitted on July 19, 2001, city did not receive any formal applications for this site. 2 z a) Parking: b) Landscaping: 8. Design Review Comments: Please refer to the attached parking dimensions chart for the required dimensions of parking stalls and drive aisles. The two -way drive aisle must to 25 feet if the 90 degree parking stalls are 8.5'x19' and curb length is 8.5' and unit width is 63'. The drive aisle can be 24 feet if the 90 degree parking stalls are 9' x 19' and curb length of 9' and unit width of 62'. The site plan only shows 24' drive aisle and 8'x18' of parking stall. z _ 1- w 6 00 D Also, only 30 percent of total parking stalls can be compact. w I . Further bicycle parking must be provided. Refer to attached TMC 18.56.130, for w w 0 development standards for bicycle parking. g gQ Also, per TMC 18.56.040, wheel stops must be provided two feet from the end of the stall of c head -in parking. ± Z • = I- 0 Z • ~ U • 0 O 5 o ! Five feet of Type I landscaping is required along the entire north and east property lines. = Portion of this is missing where the retaining wall is proposed. f - v Interior parking lot landscaping must meet the standards listed in TMC 18.52.035(2)(c), i.e. id to a minimum of 200 square feet plus 15 square feet for each parking stall over 40. Also, per P TMC 18.52.035(4), landscape islands shall be placed at the ends of each interior row with o z For the number of parking stalls shown, Table F of Washington Barrier Free Code requires six accessible stalls. no stall more than 10 stalls or 100 feet from the landscape area. The minimum size of interior parking lot islands is 100 square feet and they must be minimum of 6 feet in any direction and generally the length of adjacent parking space. Also, a minimum of one evergreen or deciduous tree is required per landscape island with remaining area to contain a combination of shrubs, living groundcover and mulch. The landscape plan also must include a note that all landscaped areas shall be covered by automatic irrigation system. The tree survey must indicate all trees that will be removed and also all sensitive areas and their buffers must be shown on that tree suvey. This is required per TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. c) Building Design: The long building facade must be modulated to provide some interest and break the monotony. The entrance to the building must be made more prominent. 3 A pedestrian plaza could be incorporated near the building entrance. The plaza could include bicycle parking, benches for employees and planters etc. The HVAC equipment screen wall must be designed so that it is consistent with design of the primary structure. The choice of material should be such that it consistent with the proposed building. The entire pedestrian path that leads from 51 Ave South to the entrance of the building must be of concrete instead of striping on the asphalt. Colored concrete is preferred to highlight the entrance of the building. Please provide details of the retaining walls. Based on the information submitted at this time, it is not clear why retaining walls are proposed along the entire south side and along substantial portions on the north and west side. As stated earlier, site sections must be submitted along with retaining wall details. Site design must avoid long blank retaining walls. Provide a detail of the railing along the loading dock. Maximum allowed height in Office zone is 35 feet or 3 stories. Please provide documentation from your architect that it is considered a 3 -story building per Uniform Building Code and not a two -story building with a basement. Recycling storage space must be provided to meet the minimum amount specified in TMC 18.52.080. The architectural design of the screen wall must be consistent with the design of the proposed building. d) Lighting Plan: Please provide a lighting plan that includes location and type of street and site lighting. Parking and loading areas must include lighting in scale and height of the associated structure. Refer to item #24 in the submittal checklist for details related to lighting plan. Also, refer to TMC 18.52.065 for additional lighting requirements. e) Signage: The location of the monument sign is within 40 -foot vision triangle. Please show the revised location. Please note that setback of the freestanding sign from the property line is equal to the height of the sign. The sign must be set in a landscaped area. 9. Public Works Comments: a) Traffic Impact analysis: See attached email from Cyndy Knighton dated August 13, 2001 b) Since the area is wet, underdrains in the parking area should be considered to reduce the potential of pavement failure. 4 r ; ti c) The plan does not show water quality treatment, which is required by the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 10. Fire Department Comments: We are still in the process of reviewing your wetland report and may have some additional comments regarding the wetland report and stream relocation and mitigation plan, which we will try and get to you by next week. If you have any questions, you can reach me at 206 - 431 -3685. Sincerely, a) Four -inch fire line is shown on the plans. It must be increased to 8 inches. b) Fire hydrant may be required around the perimeter of the building. Locations must be shown on the site plan Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner Encl.: Geotechnical report guidelines handout Type 2 permit application handout- Special Permission Director TMC 18.45 Sensitive areas TMC 18.54 (Tree regulations) Boundary Line Adjustment application handout TMC 18.56 Parking TMC 18.52 Landscaping /recycling /lighting Email from Cyndy Knighton- TIA comments 5 c �/a OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O R S D E V E L O P E R S August 16, 2001 Mr. Steve Lancaster City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Opus development at Sl sr Ave. S and S 151' St. Dear Steve: r -� RECEIVED AUG 2 0 2001 D EVELOPMENT OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 30C Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 - 453 -4100 Fax 425 - 453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com We have an excellent opportunity to develop the two south parcels along South 151' Street at 51' Avenue South. This site is the first choice for a developer of Mariott Extended Stay Residence Inns. Enclosed are pictures of three Extended Stay Residence Inns. It seems this would be an appropriate of this site. Our client would like to put a 100 -room facility at this location. The primary user of one of these facilities is someone visiting an office for a week or more at a time. It is a use for the site that we could put together in a very short period. Given the overbuilt office market, this is an opportunity to build something on the site in the next 12 months rather than waiting for the office market to recover. It is our hope you'll be able to advise us on how this might be accomplished. It appears that under Section 18.18.2020 (23) the director can permit such a use. Specifically it seems to be similar in nature and compatible to other uses within the district and consistent with the purposes of the district. The site's close proximity to the airport, other offices in the Tukwila area, and its quick access to I -5 would shorten the visiting business person's use of an automobile. We will call the week of August 20 to discuss this opportunity in greater depth with you. Please don't hesitate to call me at (425) 453 -4100 with any questions before then. Sincere Opus rthwest, .L.C. Any Sr. Re to Manager cc: / Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Bart Brynestad Sr. Real Estate Director %: S: bLt::. OS�G.«,..»:. L:. ',4iii..a.- +wr�•.i:....�.vr. Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. Mariott Residence Inns The attached pictures and plans show the different building designs and do not necessarily represent what would be built on the site at 51s Avenue South and South 151 Street. • • Las Vegas, Nevada 256 rooms Z L 1� W JU 0 (/) (/) I _ CO Li_ H LUO - LL Q co 2 W Z = I- O ZI- w ui co U 0— p I- ww 2 I- - IL O .. W H� 0 Z :: - 7-r---- . - --- -------' .......,/". ...\-„,...._ -=•.--',-• — .---- ...„.../' ..:7, -.: T . ,r 7 •-• - z vii An:: :,•.!•• li ;.i' ••• ... 1.1it■ 7e..! t *"; , 1 , Scottsdale, Arizona 120 rooms Portland, Oregon 258 rooms Residence Inn Site Selection and Design Criteria Development potential of a site is clearly enhanced when it has desirable physical characteristics such as level topography and a regular shape. Marriott's Architecture and Construction Division maintains Design Criteria for site planning that guides the site development. Marriott uses this as the basis for review prior to approval of the project. A potential Residence Inn site should possess the following qualities • Good visibility from major roadways • Convenient access to and from hotel • Proximate to demand generators • Adjacent to support amenities • Well positioned with competitive supply • Compatible surrounding land uses • Adequately sized to properly locate building /parking /drives to allow for required setbacks • Secure and safe surroundings • Limited code or covenant restrictions and appropriate zoning • Utilities readily available The major elements of the site Residence Inn Site Design Features design criteria include • Hotel is separate and distinct parcel • Dedicated primary access from public road • No shared parking or circulation routes with adjacent land uses • Minimal cross connections between adjoining sites • 1:1 — Parking to room ratio • Well distributed parking in relation to building entries • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems are safe, adequate and efficient • Perimeter property landscape buffer • Minimum building and parking setbacks as required in Marriott Design Criteria • Service /trash enclosures out of site from arriving guests and guest rooms • Screening of undesirable off site views with landscaping and /or fencing • Attractively landscaped grounds especially around the building and at entrances • Swimming pool and spa • Patio with barbecue • SportCourt play court package • Flag pole with up -light • Gatehouse with drop -off area and welcoming entrance z • • I F: Z a ;a O `U ❑ W= J F- w L Q 5. _cr w Z I- 0 Z F- . w i❑p. 0 I • I- 1=. 'o z U = 0I': z 3 3 3 3 3 a 3 a 3 -rs _ . ... , - - <-7:-' - • 1 ;`,.. - , f‘ , ! — s 1 -,:•••• 1 :is. '4. *i I ii;‘,. -. ;L - iti ..1":••••• ..,,,. - Auy.,,-„,--, ,'''',44 ",,..-;;.. „,-",",", • - • •-■ -. -. 4._ ...t....)54 p3,, ,,,,,,„ , ..,..„: 1„ : ,,..; „....,:.,„.......„,„_ .......1 -4 - .1144 ,. .4 105 ; ii tr- *I • ....,.m,____ •:, v ....., ■-•.w.1 , s 4 • ...r....,!:,. F, , :d 1:. ,'; ,. , . !,j I ' . i'g.7,5`17-i• z:1 - ' '.f '.'-. '' ''• I . 1 ,4 1 tj 1 t' ' '"''' • .2......- r* -- - r ._. . 7 ---.--777777mt - e • .1..L.,..,. ,C A,,,,..,......b.,t.:.,,,1.0.5..■:...-i;itr: Z.7,.,..;:,,,,, . opt,."}:,--,,,i.v..v.,,, i - ....,,, ,.. ..— - — = a— v..tImismim -- 2 - -,, .....,...,..,...r,.. ..--r....,s "TT-17---,o4-,17:4-4--;; : 4:11—'. . 1 .1 31. i.I Y .t. :-*::: : : :7 1: ..........,,,t;,-....._;...-7.-• . --;:-. -#.Z..2741114' 774:111:;:'::••TF. .2.'.. ' -- - ------:'. , --:-. -..--'-'7"----.-"--4'.---1 7 ' -; '''.--.•-• ' . 1---- - 7.';'-'5L'''''11.4"....----1-LT::.-3-4-11t '''''.j.---. -----P- -------''''-'.. ' '"'7::'";:T';';::':'•',1.bt4r4'''.'4ti: Y::!'r.'',,:',!4:,'C:;:::';'.}e-•;!!I4.-:7;::-*4.4'I?"- ...."'iT" ;... .':1• . 2: .*:' ,,`.t,,,,.,,,, .. -I-on,— : ,..=,':1 :.-, ... ■ -:' .....-----,. . .. . . ' '-..--... -••••-•••••-•-. • . - ' - im pT I N m Aarrfoft. Residence 108 SUITES tiln; z z w 0 co 0 W W I w 0 I I u_ < co w z 0 Z I— UIL O u) O — O I— W w I = u iz — • I L I' 0 O 1- z 3 3 3 3 .9 2 -BDRM I -BDR I -BDR STUDIO B STUDIO TUD I -BDR STUDIO B STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO STUDIO • 11•11111t 53 -3" IF 4th FLOOR la IC. CORRIDOR � J r • ow STAIR !2 Residence IIII. STUDIO WI FIREPLACE 4th FLOOR • 31d 4 4th FLOORS 2nd FL ••R I 256'451/2" LINEN STOP- FT R • 2nd FLOOR • 3rd 4 4th FLOORS NOTE: 2 -BDRM UNITS NAVE FIREPLACES 9 2nd, 3rd 4 4th FLOORS GUEST SUITES BUILDING FLOOR PLAN 104 SUITES 40' 20' 10' 5' 0 Z • Q • i E- Z � W QQ 2` W -.I C.) UO W 0 . W = J H W 0 LL W Z O Z E- , ul U IO u O E- W W: S U E- _ . O ~ 3 3 31 31 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 sidence nil. END ELEVATION SHINGLE ROOF T.O. CEMENTI- 'h_F TIOUS ti SIDING =rd F BRICK �d F 1st FLl GUEST SUITES BUILDING ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVA'T'ION SHINGLE ROOF GEMENTI- TIOUS SIDING BRICK SHINGLE ROOF CEMENTI- TIOUS SIDING BRICK it 104 SUITES 32' 16' 8' 4' 0 lj : Mosc da - opus From: Ryan Partee To: Jill Mosqueda Date: 8/15/01 7:49AM Subject: opus Jill, z Essentially, these are the things I'd like to see from OPUS. They also answered questions 1 -1 and 3 -2 incorrectly. '17-Need-site-plan 0 0 p U �2. New creek cross section and channel restoration and bank stabilization plan /mitigation. w: =: 3. Detention vault and water quality features W f- Tr Tr p T co u. 5. JARPA application for HPA ui 0 6- Wetland- resto ration/raft igation .: 2 u_ ?; P.S. enjoy the Aero Bar � z � • o� U • H: W W; 1 - U 15 . z '. Cu O N O z Ryan Page 1 1 Date: DIRECTIONS May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Applicant Name: Street Address: City, State, Zip: Telephone: cP/J NDYdfuwQ.&t " C.LC, / 67 ( ,fie , A- Z� x(60 This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully, circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. 1 z cc w J U 0 W = U w 0 U D I a � z F- O . z w w U � 0 - f- w I w U • w z = 0 F- z 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 18.06, Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 YES Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 YES ontinue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 i I the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. N • - ontinue to Question 4-0 er ontinue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4 -0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site d . • = construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 5-0 YES - Continue to Question 5-0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 18.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not e t under TMC 18.45.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 6-0 YES - Continue to Question 6-0 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and sche duled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. May 24, 2001 u: »=l 4 2 Part A (continued) 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or grass. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete (EC hecklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. �� .,r � Continue to Question 1 -2 G�Cu� c/ �1j�'r'$' eft t YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and /or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 1 -3 YES) Continue to Question 1 -3 1 -3 `t ill the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development; or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES Continue to Question 1 -4 May 24, 2001 inued) City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) C YEontinue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 4211 ontinue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 "1 the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -4 ilip ontinue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 ill the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - ontinue to Question 2 -5 2 -5 ill the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. NO -C Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) S - )Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) 1 -4 Will your project generate stonnwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stonnwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate stonmwater, answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) ontinue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist • sau rte _• 4 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. May 24, 2001 5 ., . _ . usiikasLxsintzlzris 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. N II ontinue to Question 3 -2 . ontinue to Question 3 -2 ii 3 -2 t 1 1 the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access s • d answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3-4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. N N O �- Continue to Question 3 -5 41 1 `D Continue to Question 3 -5 3 -5 " the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees, logs, shrubs, rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity s d answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - ontinue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish /Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. May 24, 2001 5 ., . _ . usiikasLxsintzlzris Part D (continued May 24, 2001 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baseflow /groundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. NO- Continue to Question 3 -7 ontinue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 ' ! ' j the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. c NO - Continue to Question 3 -8 ES - Continue to Question 3 -8 3 -8 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO ontinue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) ES - Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) 6 L . ;:- rA r+`:, . 1a5�`F �""*':L`Lh". Q • Z` rt W QQ= JU O 0 co 0 w .I = F- w LLQ U� I-W Z = w U • 0 O � O H '. L11 a l 2 L- 0 : Z w U= O~ Z 4, CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: erpu.J, Quarter: ii■I(k) Section: 23 Township: Z3 Range: o (This information may be found on your tax statement.) CITY JUL 1 9 20 DESIGN PERMIT CI:NTE► ,VIEW APPLICATION Pail/LS/4/-05 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s) block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 7 &61 (00_ Mot / - 7 6 9 / - / 1 6, 00-30 0 5 /R" ftie S 71,1-1 - 1 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Lis _ Ve7i2e� eernirtue. Address: PD13• 7 7Z. / C�- � (.1J, J /?/ ((SILO 445 Phone: 2o(0 - $6) �'S "7S FAX: O f F Signature: �1, 2Pit -�'�Q� Date: 7— / / -0 q/ //� GuII.� - f7iJkr ckanco '126 — 4 t5.? - '/evD "i25 -43 / 7/i 609c G.\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\BA U.DOC. 06!16!00 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type P -BAR Planner: File Number: Ld ( Q l Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: erpu.J, Quarter: ii■I(k) Section: 23 Township: Z3 Range: o (This information may be found on your tax statement.) CITY JUL 1 9 20 DESIGN PERMIT CI:NTE► ,VIEW APPLICATION Pail/LS/4/-05 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s) block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. 7 &61 (00_ Mot / - 7 6 9 / - / 1 6, 00-30 0 5 /R" ftie S 71,1-1 - 1 DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Lis _ Ve7i2e� eernirtue. Address: PD13• 7 7Z. / C�- � (.1J, J /?/ ((SILO 445 Phone: 2o(0 - $6) �'S "7S FAX: O f F Signature: �1, 2Pit -�'�Q� Date: 7— / / -0 q/ //� GuII.� - f7iJkr ckanco '126 — 4 t5.? - '/evD "i25 -43 / 7/i 609c G.\APPHAN\LANDUSE.APP\BA U.DOC. 06!16!00 Y TERRA ASSOCIATES, Inc. Consultants in Geotechnical Engineering, Geology and Environmental Earth Sciences Mr. Andy Taber Opus Northwest, LLC 915 — 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Subject: Preliminary Findings Geotechnical Engineering Study I -5/1 -405 Development Site Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Taber: PROJECT DESCRIPTION :' . ! •'t J UL 1 9 2001 cENTFR November 15, 2000 Project No. T -4800 As requested, on November 2, 2000, we observed soil and groundwater conditions at seven soil test pits excavated at the subject site. The purpose of our work was to provide a preliminary geotechnical evaluation of the conditions observed with respect to proposed project design and construction. We understand the project will consist of constructing a two -story office building with one level of below grade parking. The below grade parking level will daylight to the east and be constructed at a site elevation of about 95 feet. This will require an excavation approaching 15 feet along the western building margin with about 2 to 3 feet of structural fill needed to achieve grade along the eastern building margin. Parking areas are also planned east and north of the structure. EXPLORATION OBSERVATIONS Seven soil test pits were excavated to depths between 4 to 15 feet below current site grades. Five test pits were located in the building area and two test pits were located in the north parking lot area. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on Figure 1. Test pit logs describing conditions observed are attached as Figures 3 through 6. In the south building area, along the west site margin, we observed about three to four feet of fill overlying medium dense silty sand with gravel and clean sand with gravel. The fill was absent to the east. 12525 Willows Road, Suite 101, Kirkland, Washington 98034 • Phone (425) 821 -7777 • Fax (425) 821 -4334 • terra @terra - associates.com Mr. Andy Taber November 15, 2000 Groundwater was observed at an elevation of about 89 feet to the west and 82 to 83 feet to the east. In the north parking lot, we observed about six feet of fill to the west, and greater than 15 feet of fill to the east. The test pit excavated along the east edge of the north lot did not get through the fill. The fill is comprised of old construction debris including asphalt, concrete, brick, rebar, and paint cans. Based on our observations, it appears that the flatter portion of the north parcel, and the eastern slope below, is comprised entirely of old fill. DISCUSSION Soil and groundwater conditions observed on the south parcel will not preclude construction of the office building as planned. With a lower floor elevation of 95 feet, it does not appear that groundwater will be a significant issue. The native soils will provide reasonable foundation support for conventional spread footings. An open cut along the western building margin should also be possible, with the building location as planned. The north parcel will present some challenges. Constructing an asphalt concrete surfaced lot will likely require excavating and removing the top 18 inches of existing fill, and replacing it with a gravel base or a cement - amended mineral soil. Soils for utility trench backfill in this area should come from the southern building excavation. Due to the depth of the existing fill, there is the potential for non - uniform surface subsidence that could result in birdbaths developing on the lot. Also, if walls are required to accommodate grade breaks along the western margin of the lot, they should be engineered walls and not rockeries. The individual performing the environmental review should be informed about, the fill, particularly the old paint cans. Environmental review will likely require some level of sampling and testing of the fill to determine if regulated hazardous materials are present. We can prepare a full geotechnical report with recommendations for design and construction if Opus Northwest, LLC moves forward with the project. In the meantime, if you have any questions or require additional information please call. We trust the information presented is sufficient to meet your current needs. Sincerely yours, TERRA A _ SOCIATES, INC. eodore J. Scher er, P.E. Principal DKW/TJS:ae cc: Mr. Bill Bieber, Opus Northwest, LLC Encl: Figures 1 - Exploration Location Plan Figure 2 — Unified Soils Classification System Figures 3 through 6 — Test Pit Logs Project No. T -4800 Page 2 z _ Z 111 2 J U O 0 w J • IL w a = W zF- w ~ U • 0 O - O I-- wW I- LL O w z U2 0~ z • onc. poll 1 1 1 140 on e rr tap ' #14102 11 ?O A °`P 61 TP -2 TP-1 Is''• O • 10 steps • 102 102.5 Os 1 ! r) 8 :fl •itch 9 95.6 N 14910 10 .3 ti 9 94 3 2. #14912 3 edeoi� le ring 0 •'43'54 "E �n nn' 4 • \ 2 0 4 LEGEND: ' ' s 1 ' 96.6 Q gar ge 101.5 \5 12x8- l�to 2 • 133 3.7 " 1 2. 1 ( t3Z fiou o t / 130 702 co Im '3 I C 1 1. _ e. • 1p5 la) < •.t� 7 O / 6 10p. i I 106.0 0 2 F. r 1^ 709 6. • 2 TP- 605.1` ,�1471C Y / 9 iO` . ® 6 104.0 TP -7 r 1 109. r ^ o• 104.2 l WI way I r' ti0 / 1 I , , 2 ; ...\ 08 • O B I • /0 8 / .0 :nd r �I "0 ul . ‘ ,0 647--- o TP -5I I \ G .` .,0 .1 ® rport r . 0 varia le; . / height c. all 5.6 o l '1007 00 � /�0 1 r ^ • 98.2 • 91.6 1.0., U� y i 00.5 1...). „„. ` �� 103.7 ( \ /-' 2 91.4 y�9 S a ' 92_8_ _ 1r ® TP -4 • 88.7 onc. driveway TP -3 t.. ti a c13 a ` � s .. ® m 4.0 c P 3 6 / - ' 88.8 ., 6 a`aO 6, '9 --- If g92 6,p 6sA 8 ® APPROXIMATE TEST PIT LOCATION 6 \ �' 25' easement for roadway & utilities #8701270486 g69 - APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF FILL (_ "AS OBSERVED BY TERRA ASSOCIATES •90.8 ' &, • 92.4 0 9 87.9 c9 8� c \ 2,1$ •8 8 9 1,1/149_14 87.8 0 100 200 ft. d! dge of� 1 � ' 8 .0 •.Oo-, � leoring . So. • .86.9, a a' • 87.3 5 • 87.0 . cam ,-- 6p N 1 I y ,-- - WETLAND B Area = 24,395 sy.ft. 0.56 acres CD rOr N N APPROXIMATE SCALE -. -. -. r• MI • . -t•_MI REFERENCE: SITE PREPARED BY SCHOETER SURVEYING, JOB Nos. 351/12 AND 359/9, PROJECT No. 99093add, DATED 01/20/00. •I.. TERRA " " � ASSOCIATES • '�otechnical Consultants EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN 1 -5/1 -405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj.No. 4800 Date NOV. 2000 Figure 1 • "*" MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION COARSE GRAINED SOILS More than 50% material larger than No. 200 sieve size GRAVELS More than 50% of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels (less than 5% fines) GW Well- graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines. GP Poorly- graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines. Gravels w fines GM Silty gravels, gravel sand - silt mixtures, non - plastic fines. GC Clayey gravels, gravel- sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. SANDS More than 50% of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve Clean Sands (less than 5% fines) SW Well- graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SP Poorly- graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines. Sands with fines SM Silty sands, sand - silt mixtures, non - plastic fines. SC Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. r FINE GRAINED SOILS More than 50% material smaller than No. 200 sieve size SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is less than 50% ML Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight plasticity. CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is greater than 50% MH Inorganic silts, elastic. CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS SAND or GRAVEL Standard Penetration Density Resistance in Blows /Foot 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT I SPOON SAMPLER II 2.4" INSIDE DIAMTER E RG SAMPLER 1L OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLE Y WATER LEVEL (DATE) Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Pp PENETROMETER READING, tsf DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent PI PLASTIC INDEX N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot Very loose 0 -4 Loose 4 -10 Medium dense 10 -30 Dense 30 -50 Very dense >50 SILT or CLAY Standard Penetration Consistency Resistance in Blows /Foot Very soft 0 -2 Soft 2 -4 Medium stiff 4 -8 Stiff 8 -16 Very stiff 16 -32 Hard >32 TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 1 -5/1 -405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ®� Proj. No. T -4800 Date NOV 2000 Figure 2 04 .+?'. .:' hw" u' :e:::.:. vM•. t: �?, �n'. n'..-.': n"" mT.,' aM' iFi: �3tN° �T.::= inii'. N: 1:, iy4? �1. w.. aJs: t ..a:.df,:x�:,�•.:3•.`¢`i:4»'L,, • Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Test' Pit No. TP -1 Soil Description FILL: tannish -brown silty sand witigravel, loose, moist to dry. (SM) Test pit terminated at 4 feet. No groundwater encountered. Test Pit No. TP -2 Soil Description Approximate Elev. 98 Moisture Content ( %) Approximate Elev. 98 Moisture Content ( %) 8 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Brownish -gray silty SAND with gravel, loose to medium dense, moist, fill. (SM) Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to damp. (SM) Gray slightly silty SAND with gravel to clean gravelly SAND, medium dense, wet. (SM /SP) _ Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 11.5 feet. TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS 1 -5/1 -405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. T-4800 Date NOV 20001 Figure 3 , .• ,,. o:�.n. -:+ -..., .., ...f�h7treR.anF?:lc.�JrF:t^ �..,;,rcrR: cc Alitak { z Q1- w J 0 N � LL W g Q co a W z �. t- 0 zI— LL! ui U O 5- O I- W W �-o w z O • ~ z Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 5 10 15 Test Pit No. TP -3 Soil Description Approximate Elev. 90 Moisture Content ( %) 12 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Reddish -brown silty SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist to dry. (SM) Brownish -tan silty fine to medium SAND, medium dense, moist. (SM) Gray slightly silty GRAVEL with cobbles, medium dense to dense, wet. (GM /GP) Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. Light groundwater seepage below 7 feet. Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 2 feet dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Brownish -gray silty SAND to clean gravelly SAND, medium dense, moist, becomes wet. (SM /SP) Gray fine sandy SILT with clay, medium stiff, damp to wet. (ML) Gray clean SAND with gravel, medium dense, wet. (SP) Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 6 feet. TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Test Pit No. TP -4 Soil Description Approximate Elev. 89 Moisture Content ( %) TEST PIT LOGS 1 -5/1 -405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. T -4800 1Date NOV 2000 Figure 4 grAttA e Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 1 0 15 TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants Test Pit No. TP-5 Soil Description 14 inches brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Reddish-brown silty SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist to dry. (SM) Brownish-tan silty fine to medium SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist. (SM) Test pit terminated at 14 feet. No groundwater encountered. Test Pit No. TP-6 Soil Description 8 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. FILL: dark gray gravelly say SAND with brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete, rebar, loose to medium dense, moist. (SM) Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist. (SM) Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. TEST PIT LOGS 1-5/1-405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. T-4800 Approximate Elev. 102 Moisture Content (%) Approximate Elev. 109 Moisture Content (%) Date NOV 2000 Figure 5 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 1 15 Test Pit No. TP -7 Soil Description Approximate Elev. 104 Moisture Content ( %) 5 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. FILL: brownish -gray silty SAND with gravel, brick, asphaltic concrete, and concrete, paint cans, loose to medium dense, damp. (SM) Becomes dark gray to black. — �Test pit terminated at 15 feet. No groundwater encountered. TERRA ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants TEST PIT LOGS 1 -5/1 -405 DEVELOPMENT SITE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj. No. T -4800 [Date NOV 20001 Figure 6 CITY Q • i11; <,"V!ilA BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW J U L 1 9 2001 DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA (TMC l 6.60.050.B) PERMIT' %ENTER Z OPUS PARK 5/405 ,= z July 18, 2001 rt 2 J U This project is consistent with the City of Tukwila's Commercial and Light Industrial co o Design Review Criteria. The following discussion highlights the areas of compliance. J W 1. Relationship to the Site w 0 A. The site has a desirable transition with the streetscape and provides for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. The street (51s Avenue S) cn will be improved in front of the building, including donating additional right- I w of -way and constructing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Native species landscaping will be planted along the street and around the building. z O Additionally, the building is set back from the street, so that it can take ELI ju advantage of the slope of the site. Passersby will view a two -story building a from 51S` Avenue S, while viewers from Interstate 5 will see a three -story 0 building. w uj B. The parking and service areas are located, designed and screened to break up the visual impact of large paved areas. The building is located in the middle u_ of the site, thereby breaking up the parking. Small parking areas are located iii Z on each side of the building. The service areas are located on the north and U co south sides of the buildings, so as to provide two small service /loading areas p F' rather than one large one. Each is screened with a wall. Native landscaping Z surrounds the building and parking areas. C. The height and scale of the building is in keeping with the sloped site. The building fits into the hillside. Two stories are visible from the west side of the site and three stories are visible from the east side of the site (the Interstate 5 side). This minimizes the visual impact of the building. 2. Relationship of the Structure and Site to Adjoining Area A. The building provides harmony with the surrounding area through its multilevel entries and use of the slope. The building appears to be two stories in height from the west side, which has existing residential uses. The building shows three stories from the east side, which has interstate traffic traveling by the site. Muted colors will be used on the building. Also, native planting materials will be used to further harmonize with existing features in the area. B. As mentioned above, the landscaping material will be primarily native plantings. This will maximize the transition to existing foliage on adjacent properties. Additionally, the new mitigation stream will be planted with C•u:... , ..........y . , i 4 ,. .0 `2 .F rtt4*:.•!•4 ... .. +4, x.... DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA — OPUS PARK 5/405 Page 2 appropriate species which will enhance the existing wetlands to the north and south. C. This new building will be in the most northerly location in the existing office zone along 51 Avenue S. In a sense it will pioneer the character of future office development. Because of its integration with the slope, use of muted colors, and native plant landscaping, this new project will establish an appropriate character for the area. D. Vehicular, pedestrian and loading circulation patterns were considered during the design of this site. Pedestrian access to the building from 51 Avenue S is direct and crosses the least amount of parking area; pedestrians will enter on the second floor of the building. There are two vehicular accesses to the site, both of which allow vehicles to circulate easily onsite. There are two loading areas for large trucks, one on each side of the building. This allows dual use without blocking other vehicular circulation; these areas are separate from the pedestrian areas. E. As mentioned above, there will be two vehicular accesses to the site. Each access will direct vehicles to different areas of the site, thus avoiding congestion within the site. The onsite circulation is compatible with the street circulation. 3 Landscaping and Site Treatment A. This proposal has recognized and incorporated the existing topographic patterns which contribute to the beauty and utility of a development. The building uses the slope to great advantage, by building into the hillside. Two stories are visible on the uphill side and three stories are visible from the downhill side. A sea of asphalt is avoided due to placement of the building in the middle of the site. This site design recognizes and preserves the existing topographic features. B. The grades of the walkways, parking spaces, and driveways will meet city standards. The building will have ADA access. The landscaping will provide a pleasing atmosphere around the building; the use of native plant materials will provide visual continuity with the adjacent sites. C. The landscaping will enhance the building's features, integrate with existing vegetation on adjacent sites, and provide some shade in the parking areas. The landscape architect has drawn inspiration from the existing vegetation on the site and adjacent areas. Additionally, the new stream on the east side of the site will provide visual relief from Interstate 5. D. In locations where vehicles or pedestrians may damage plantings, care will be taken to provide durable plant materials. E. On this site, plantings will be limited on the east side of the northern parking areas due to the need for a retaining wall. Plantings along 51s Avenue S will be enhanced so as to provide more of a visual buffer of the parking area. Additionally, plantings will be installed within the northern parking area. DcsignRcvicwCritcria.doc % 27: Y C�iaG�Sa�3'u."�'4t'�''iYelan9tf Ya`a7ti!<itih .ax..;ti�aiR DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA — OPUS PARK 5/405 Page 3 F. A wall parallel to the building will screen each the two service /loading areas. These areas are also tucked into the hillside, which also provides screening. G. At the time of application submittal, plantings are anticipated to be used in all areas. The applicant will consider other screening techniques if asked by the Board of Architectural Review. H. While a lighting plan has not yet been developed, the applicant will ensure that lights located adjacent to walkways and in parking areas will be focused downward to light the site and not the surrounding area. Wattages will be as low as possible and still provide security. 4. Building Design A. The new building will be 35' in height and is based on the relationship to the existing, sloped site. As discussed above, the building will be set into the hillside to take advantage of the existing slope. B. Because of its use of the hillside, the new building is in scale with the permanent residential buildings west of 51s Avenue S. From this direction, only two stories of the new building will be visible. Also, the building (on its east side) is compatible with the existing office buildings located south of S. 151 St. On this side, three stories are visible. C. The building is well - proportioned and consistent with current office building design practices. The many windows will give the building an open feeling, as well as allow users to view the surrounding area. The building will be constructed of tilt -up concrete, which is very durable and long- lived. It will be painted as well. D. Colors will be muted and complement the surrounding area. E. Mechanical equipment and other utility equipment will be screened. F. Exterior lighting has not yet been designed. However, it will complement the building. G. The design of this building avoids monotony through fitting the building into the existing site slope. A significant number of windows, muted colors, and banding at the cornice will provide architectural interest. Overall, the building fits well into this site. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture A. Miscellaneous structures in addition to the new building are not anticipated. Any street lights which are installed as part of the frontage street improvements will be approved by the City. The applicant wants the new building to enhance the area and provide a well - designed office environment. B. As mentioned above, any streetlights which are required will be of a design approved by the city and consistent with city standards. DcsignRevicwCriteria.doc x'+.it.i.:S.:i::;M.:;�.Hr.. ti.. ',�:is "aP�c$uiis -.a Y?!khir t � }...�'�+.+? t�:'.u:Si.::.ad :^ ^' vs;r. >e;i PART. A: (To be completed by applicant) Site Address (Attach map and Legal Description showing hydrant location and size of main): � ¢. .M"�, ,� C 'UY. •.. R .t.. . J. Nr, ::(` J.J: .w.�a�':" .t.. 5� a u . Ad: .. Yh, I:i4. x (�+ J?a * j� y ..ii . .' '�(1+M = v..• cif V \G� f Name: no „i._ l t �� CC ' .�C'Z�' u� Name: t' vi 1 4! / C� Address: / t `j 7/8z" . � � .. Phone: cl - r - > ' Phone: r› .20/0 - & — 5 This certificate is for the purposes of: ❑ Residential Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Short Subdivision Commercial/Industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone ❑ Other Estimated number of service connections and meter size(s): Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the closest point of structure ft. Area is served by (Water utility district): . Owner /Agent Signature: .. Date: PROJECT #: The proposed project is located within 4Renrii /PheIrse, q „ CITY JU L 1 p. CITY OF TUKWILA Permit Center fs C_ 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100, Tukwil WA* 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 Certificate of Water Availability (Required only if outside City of Tukwila water utility district) PART B: (To be completed by water utility district) +-x • (City/County) The improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plap or to meet the minimum flow requirements of the project before connection: A- VA- 0 tie 1..X ei) LUI PAC_Y_ IgAN U1t.'.ry J c iCCt�' /' h 1*! 9 `� ' - t'f' (.��.5 C ✓c' f '..' (it l fi 9 � (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) B sed upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and.will be available at the site with a flow of �(v(JV gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2 hours at a velocity of S. l fps as documented by the attached calculations. f/A ',. rtc• 41- `i:rri $ " 0 0 6,pr'rt i 1 2- FP•f I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. t u)o-tear' 0i . ° 1c Agen hone loco-c914a f -- 7 — Ci PART C: (To be completed by governing jurisdiction) Minimum water system improvements: (At least equal to B2 above) (Use separate sheet if more room is needed) Water Availability: ❑ Acceptable service can be provided to this project ❑ Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements in item C2 are met. ❑ System isn't capable of providing service to this project. ":'. L.' �a" �: �Ra.,... .�+..- .,,,•nxi��'Y.?�- .��:57;+. ���Y' w:" �... W.- �.... ��„>....,.—..:: 4. c. ��F7zew:. �. �,. � + ✓�_�,:•r'r..�.sw..�t��'.,�.y- .x.a.*"w _ a_ H-ha Date Z w Ce 00 (n 0 co w w J ? w d = z � F- Z ~ w U � O - O I— W H � u.. w z O ~ z Raft A. (To I3e.Cornpletcd by Applicant) Purpose of Calficate: Q Building Permit C) Preliminary Plat or PUD Er es ,t►e Q Short Subdivision 4 Re =one Proposed Use: 0 Residential single Family 0 Residential Multi- Family ErCommercIal C3 Other Applicants Nate: Q s. , thji, Phone: 4 2. - ' 53 —4 i ao Property Address Approximate Location; A'"d`l'TA r 5 I Av E 4 N ° /5_4, - - - -- Le Descrlptron(Attech Map and Legal Description If necessary): Part B. To Be Completed by Sewer Agency) 1. ❑ e, Sewer SeMce will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing sin sewer feet from the site end the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR ) b. Sewer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: 0 (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and/or 0 (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and/or i (3) other (describe): Sq 1-1 f a fd n} co n•, e.. el o'f q Je vCJQ #GYj T • J 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) la e. The sewer system Improvement Is In conformance with a County approved Newer comprehensive plan, OR Q b. The sewer system Improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. 51 e. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the District, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of senAce outside the District of city, QR Q b, Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service, 4. Service is subject to the following: a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GPO: $ SFC: $ UNIT; $ TOTAL.: $ (Subject to Change on January 1st) King CountyiMETRO Capacity Charge: Currently, $1090lresldoneal equivalent, will be billed directly by King County after connection to the sewer system. (Subject to change by King Co/Metro without nottae) - - 01/09/2001 11:30 UAL SEWER DISTRICT 4 2868426 �'WORKJNO TOWARD A Darrell ENVIRONMENT" CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITYNON- AVAILABILITY ail Certificate of Sewer Availability SEWER DISTRICT 14810 Military Road South P.O. Box 89550 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 2424236 Fax; (206) 242.1527 OR q Certificate of Sewer Non - Availability NO.449 D01 y : OM? A I 9 2001 e. Other / - N 4� a.3 � e.T'e cued On fii ra coves 41 ,...�.., i ho ► certify that the above sewer agency Information Is true. Thla certification shall be valid for one year fr . " o data of sigmatt#e z W 6 J 0 U J = H N w g w z �. O ` Z w uj U � O U a I—; w W 2 U L" O .. Z O H . z UMW la 010 0110 tall 1ti0 01M 1001000011 iiiialliRial aolf 1100M ` 74,4$ 1, 7f Mai mil SAM 0.st °. ill MI I tv MaillliNiall MTN min lial KW 761110=0 1/09/2001 11:30 UAL I''"', SEWER DISTRICT 2868426 , 01/08/2001 15:47 206286, o LISA VERNER it /U /00 1=:01 FAX Ue 463 1717 OIU$ N11 L.I.0 r /44-0/1.76 6o9Ci %Gs coo O0' ciao U /w't 1 0093 0o9 a.49 '7) J(o0 00a9 • '71",4, I ( '003 i '7 (49 W 0l9> % 1G,ca l too 6030 •I1 Opus Tukwila 1.5/1.445 Business Center Piopetty► dwaoraISolknu y�1r/li'aV1f]Sw';n�x �n }.j NO.449 002 PAGE 02 X007 Location of Proposal: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 File Number: E01 -018 Applied: 07/19/2001 Issue Date: 12/18/2001 Status: ISSUED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Proponent: OPUS NORTHWEST Lead Agency: City of Tukwila cn u_ w u _ Description of Proposal: OPUS OFFICE BUILDING -THREE STORY 69,920 SQUARE FEET1ND 164 PARKING STALLS ON AN APPROXIMATELY 3.3 H w ACRE SITE. z I— O w n 0 U WW i-- L O .. z w 2 ' O~ Address: 14910 51 AV S TUKW Parcel Number: 7661600061 , 7661600030 Section/Township /Range: NW 23 -23-4 The City has deterr+nined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by January 2, 2002 The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 doc: Miscperm E01 -018 December 18, 2001 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21 C.075) Attachment G Printed: 12 -17 -2001 .:;;k :iF'ii. .s:r.J•.W...: %. wi f a'° `i.. - -. �.- .".J.`�:."tl+�u .. ..of x+an•rru t z W CC 2 —1 U 00 U) e J = z A LINDAMERICA COMPANY ISSUED BY TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation Attest: h • Secretary `.Cr!'•iLD 11 1 9 � QQ j GUARANTEE NUMBER c NT ER MUD-0001638. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a corporation, herein called the Company GUARANTEES GUARANTEE SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE LIMITS OF LIABILITY AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS OF THIS GUARANTEE, the Assured named in Schedule A against actual monetary loss or damage not exceeding the liability amount stated in Schedule A which the Assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers, the Guarantee to become valid when countersigned on Schedule A by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: A _t_ 4. 4 President OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. 915 118TH AVE SE #300 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 Attn: ANDY TABLER Order No. 870309 Customer No. - -- See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" 1. RECORDING NO.: RECORDING DATE: DOCUMENT: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: 2. RECORDING NO.: RECORDING DATE: DOCUMENT: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: 3. RECORDING NO.: RECORDING DATE: DOCUMENT: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 14450 N.E. 29TH PLACE BELLEVUE, WA 98007 COUNTERSIGNED: By: 42 6.6 -:58 t W. J.NES �Y C ' ROR AX (42.) 4 JO SCHEDULE A Chain of Title Guarantee Liability: Premium: Tax: Total: 1- 800 -441 -7701 MARK S. NIKLASON, or J. JAY PUGH 46 -8593) 1. Name of Assured: OPUS NORTHWEST 2. Date of Guarantee: December 15, 2000 at 8:00 A.M. The assurances referred to on the face page hereof are: That according to those public records which, under the recording laws, impart constructive notice of matters relating to the interest, if any, which was acquired /reserved by SHEILA J. BURNS $320.00 $320.00 $ 27.52 x`347.52 pursuant to a Deed recorded under King County Recording No. 7708260896 in and to the land described as follows: Only the following matters appear in such records subsequent to December 15, 1950: 7708260896 August 26, 1977 Deed Steven C. McDaniel and Amy Jo McDaniel Sheila J. Burns 7503200033 March 20, 1975 Deed Robert L. Ulrey and Bettye L. Ulrey Steven C. McDaniel 7402140313 February 14, 1974 Deed Ralph A. Engle and Flora A. Engle Robert L. Ulrey and Bettye L. Ulrey •_;• ;.;C; _•viii., • -;� ?.,' ,% �_': r�ii '.'is�?�' S +wa ii4,9e :.*.V,i . i 'c}a. 1 : no rtae: or. EXCEPTIONS (continued) Order No. 870309 4. RECORDING NO.: 5937026 RECORDING DATE: October 6, 1965 DOCUMENT: Deed GRANTOR: Pearl McKercher GRANTEE: Ralph A. Engle and Flora A. Engle 5. RECORDING NO.: 5335369 RECORDING DATE: January 29, 1961 DOCUMENT: Deed GRANTOR: M.V. Boddy GRANTEE: Jean Boddy 6. RECORDING NO.: RECORDING DATE: DOCUMENT: GRANTOR: GRANTEE: This Guarantee does not cover: 1. Taxes, assessments, and matters related thereto. BW /rr ENCLOSURES: Paragraphs 1 -6 Copies have been sent to the following: CLAYTON GROUP SERVICES 4636 EAST MARGINAL WAY S #215 SEATTLE, WA 98134 5329028 September 13, 1961 Seller's Assignment of Contract & Deed Estate of Jean Boddy, Deceased Pearl McKercher 2. Instruments, proceedings or other matters which do not specifically describe said land. Page 2 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF TRACT 4 OF SEATTLE LAND COMPANY'S 5 ACRE TRACT, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME 6 OF PLATS, PAGE 90, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 150 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE OF 199.25 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4, A DISTANCE 148 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 4; THENCE EASTERLY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Page 3 Order No. 870309 SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE OF THIS GUARANTEE 1. Except to the extent that spedfic assurances are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters against the title, whether or not shown by the public records. (b) (I) Taxes or assessments of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property; or, (2) Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not the matters excluded under (1) or (2) are shown by the records of the taxing authority or by the public records. (c) (I) Unpatented mining claims; (2) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (3) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public records. 2. Notwithstanding any specific assurances which are provided in Schedule A of this Guarantee, the Company assumes no liability for loss or damage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters affecting the title to any property beyond the lines of the land expressly described in the description set forth in Schedule (A), (C) or in Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps or any structure or improvements; or any rights or easements therein, unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (b) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters. whether or not shown by the public records; (1) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by one or more of the Assureds; (2) which result in no loss to the Assured; or (3) which do not result in the invalidity or potential invalidity of any judicial or non - judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provided. (c) The identity of any party shown or referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown or referred to in this Guarantee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. Definition of Terms. The following terms when used in the Guarantee mean: (a) the "Assured ": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Guarantee, or on a supplemental writing executed by the Company. (b) "land ": the land described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule (A)(C) or in Part 2, nor any right, title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. (c) "mortgage ": mortgage, deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (d) "public records ": records established under state statutes at Date of Guarantee for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. (e) "date ": the effective date. 2. Notice of Claim to be Given by Assured Claimant. An Assured shall notify the Company promptly in writing in case knowledge shall come to an Assured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest, as stated herein, and which might cause loss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this Guarantee. If prompt notice shall not be given to the Company, then all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required; provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any Assured under this Guarantee unless the Company shall be prejudiced by the failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 3. No Duty to Defend or Prosecute. The Company shall have no duty to defend or prosecute any action or proceeding to which the Assured is a party, notwithstanding the nature of any allegation in such action or proceeding. 4. Company's Option to Defend or Prosecute Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to Cooperate. Even though the Company has no duty to defend or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3 above: (a) The Company shall have the right, at its sole option and cost, to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the Assured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Guarantee, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this Guarantee. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. (b) If the Company elects to exercise its options as stated in Paragraph 4(a) the Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of such Assured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the Assured and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel, nor will the Company pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by an Assured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not covered by this Guarantee. (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as permitted by the provisions of this Guarantee, the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to appeal from an adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this Guarantee permits the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, an Assured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, and all appeals therein, and permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of such Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, an Assured, at the Company's expense, shall give the Company all reasonable aid in any action or proceeding, securing evidence, CLTA Guarantee Conditions and Stipulations obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending the action or lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as stated herein, or to establish the lien rights of the Assured. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to furnish the required cooperation, the Company's obligations to the Assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. S. Proof of Lou or Damage. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 2 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided to the Company, a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be furnished to the Company within ninety (90) days after the Assured shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the matters covered by this Guarantee which constitute the basis of loss or damage and shall state, to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of the Assured to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligation to such assured under the Guarantee shall terminate. In addition, the Assured may reasonably be required to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shall produce for examination, inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company, all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Guarantee, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company, the Assured shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine, inspect and copy all records, books, ledgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party, which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the Assured provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless, in the reasonable judgment of the Company, it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the Assured to submit for examination under oath, produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or governmental regulation, shall terminate any liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for that claim. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Termination of Liability. In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the Company shall have the following additional options: (a) To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. The Company shall have the option to pay or settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount of this Guarantee or, if this Guarantee is issued for the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the Company shall have the option to purchase the indebtedness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the amount owing thereon, together with any costs, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of purchase. Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. In the event after notice of claim has been given to the Company by the Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebtedness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase price. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (a) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss or damage, other than to make the payment required in that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation for which the Company has exercised its options under Paragraph 4. 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. This Guarantee is a contract of Indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the Assured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage of This Guarantee. The liability of the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured shall not exceed the least of: (a) the amount of liability stated in Schedule A or in Part 2; (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebtedness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, as limited or provided under Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations. at the time the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee occurs, together with interest thereon; or (c) the difference between the value of the estate or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. 8. Limitation of Liability. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or cures any other matter assured against by this Guarantee in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS CONTINUED ON BACK COVER SAFECO Filed for Record at Request of g TER RECORDING MAIL TO: NAME Northwest EsLl;,::.. •• r ADDRESS CITY AND STATE THE GRANTOR SUBJECT TO: Eas•mmIt:s, restrictions and Dated �2. c..� Steven C. McDanilLIdividuall 4174 9c �77769a, u,U Amy Jo 1,e1•.•.Ilndividuall rt.: STI E 6F WASHING TOrj OO1tjITY bF Yttig . ` On this flay peerionally ippiared before me Steven C: • Htl e ait#sl to me known • to'be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowl- edged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and cificial seal this day of August . t977 a ,IP . re E' i,l E AX PAID AUG 2(3 1977 E426981. -5 19 Z Notary jlblic in and for the State of Washington, residing at -.z rr - G� ;,T. ATUTORYWARRANTY DEED � G r r THIS SPACE I. S/ I TITLE INSURA'CE COMPANY STEVEN C. MC DANIEL, aid Amy Jo MC DANIEL, husband and wife for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to SHEILA J. BURNS, an unmarried woman FOR RECORDER'S USE Slj r:.! l 4p „ Ac 'ri SF F F� the following described real estate, situated in the County of King Washington: That portion of Tract 4 of Seattle Land Company's 5 Acre Tract, according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 90, in King County, Washington, der ^ribed as follows: , State of t � 1\ said Tract 4, with the Westerly 1 Beginning at the intersection of the south line of line of primary State Highway No. 1; thence westerly along said southerly line 150 feet to the true point of beginning; thence northerly parallel with the west line of said Tract 4, a distance of 199.25 feet; thence westerly to a point on the west line of said Tract 4, a distance 148 feet southerly of the northwest corner thereof; thence southerly to the southwest corner of said Tract 4; thence easterly to the true point of beginning. razervatica4 • cf :acosd it Auy. . q ? � � •L,',' Ofi /e4 yy Yif �i.t •i,. el. .a� . siAaf . aSbin .o • . sEPLOi' Itavet of � t7/1. . 1 : � STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF and tome known to be the vr 0 '� :} On this day of 19_, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared President and Secretary respectively, of the corporation thatexecuted the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volun- tary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and pur- poses therein mentioned, and on oath stated that • authorized to execute the said instrument and thbt the seal affixed is the corporate seal of said corporation. Witness my hand and 3fticial seal hereto affixed the day and year first above written. Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing :9f Z = I... �.Z a W 6 00 CD O W I F - W O � Z d I_ Z � I O W ~ O • — O I— li' W I— W Z w U 0 1— Z 7503200033 SAFECO. TITL. MILITARY ROAD ADDRESS TllL•. GRANTOR s, RObERT L. ULrEY and BETTYE L. ULREY, husband and wife, for and id consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, in hand paid, conveys and warrants :o STEVEN C. McDAnieL, a single man, is Grantee. the following d- scribed real estate, situated in the County of King S'tate of Washington: That portion of Tract 4, of Seattle Land Company'• b dare Tract, according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 90, in King County, Washington, described as follows: Beginnine at the intersection of the South line of said Tract 4, with the Westerly line of primary State Highway No. 1; thence Westerly along said Southerly line 160 feet to the true point of beginnings thence Northerly parallel with the West line of said Tract 4, a distance of 199.25 feet' thence Westerly to a. point on the West line of said Tract 4, distant 148 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner thereof= thenoe Southerly to the Southwest corner of said Tract 4; thence Easterly to.the true point of beginning. Purchaser agrees to assume en existing Mortgage now in favor of Grantor in the approximate mount of $18,559.88, and agrees to pay said Mortgage according to its own terms and conditions. •7 � 7 V i L' • ` ,7 Dated this 'T .. g1Af ►1 w't...: i v§. S:�E OF 1 .atal dTCN I lb At pn - L ; 7 ss. W jt4fpy • y( ; o A i G 4 i •.iOrt�thi,�'� 1 7 day of •,M....M.. \ STATUTORY WARRANTY DECO March, 1975 day of 1i4 undersigned. a Notary Public i.7 and for the State of Washington. duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ..N Robert L. Ulrey end Bettye L. Riney, husband and wife, to me known to be the 'mitt idualS described in And who executed the foregoing instrument. and acknowledged to me that {llry signed an.i sealed this said instrument as 1411-40r, free and voluntary act and deed for the use and purposes therein m:ntianed p (Ayr.: under my band and official seal this 1 7 day of )1 olary rr.Wi r • THIS SPACE . .Rl'Er` FOR RECORDER'. USE RFC(Ie; tD .. • P EGUF;tiT • fl75 �IAfj ,ft A R 30 ••V(.: co. wN t� — sits t•117 f)F 9S (SEAL) ' (SFA1 ) , before me, the %a a.d fur the Slav' of N /.in,lun, 0 ))i..'..' .S'`..'•., f.P..':4°',Lr ' 4A, 7402140313 Meneer National Title Iasinnce Request of Pacific WEst Escrow_ P. 0. Box C Buticn. Washington STATE OF WASHINGTON, __ REVENUE PEI.Io 3 Subject to all easeaents,.restrictions and reservations of record. Dated this 5th day of February, 1974 GIVEN under my hand and of ay official seal this /o) dal deer � +'� , • • • Y i,1 °i>. ttvf NVf st Ar, roaw ' 3s Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR RALPH A. ENGLe and FLORA A. ENGLE, his wife fur and in Lonsideratian of TEN ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good and valuable considerations in hand paid. cun'eys and warrants to ROBERT L. ULrey and BETTYE L. ULREy, his wife the following described real estate, situated in the County of Washington: That portion of Tract 4. of Seattle Land Company's 5 Acre Tract, according to the plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 90, in King County. Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the Intersection of the South line of said tract 4. with the westerly line of Primary State Highway No. 1: thence Westerly along said southerly line 150 feet to the true point of beginning: thence northerly parallel with the vest line of said tract 4. a distance of 199.25 feet; thence westerly to a point on the west line of said tract 4, distant 148 fact southerly of the northwest corner thereof: thence southerly to the southwest corner of said tract 4: thence easterly to the true point of beginning. King , State of if .:'� < (mu.) ..• On this day personally appeared before mftalph A. Engle and Flora A. Engle. his iri� t t to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregorn�irisliument • and'��• • acknowledged that they signed tl.e sane as their free and voluntary act } deed, foe the' uses and purposes therein mentioned. • ,%'otary Pubis( is and Joe tie State of II•atiiagtau, residing t^..Ra :,. vet 4706 PAGE64b 5937026 THE GRANTOR, PEARL MckERCHER, an unmarried woman, Get and in tonsidcntion of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid. conveys and warrants to RALPH ENGLE and fLORA ENGLE, his wife, the following described teal state, situated in the county of King State of Washington: Beginning at 7 tha, : na Ft hwest'Acornor„ jot that 44 Seattle Land Company' 8''5 Acre - ?rants; . `according to. plat thereof recorded in Volume 6 ot.'Plata', *Ypsge records of Ring Coady, Wash- ington; thence Rieterly' along the north aloe • of' maid Tract 4., a dis tans e.of 280 feet, more or..laua,'.:to'.an• intersection with a' straight.' line. which• runs.froa;s.point•'opposite Highway Engineer's Station L'W 2582 +50 which point is 80 feet westerly when measured at right angles from the LW line of Primary State Highway No. 1, South 178th Street to South 126th Street, to a 2nd point opposite Highway Engineer's Station D P T 80+ said 2nd. point being 115 feet westerly therefrom when measured at:right angles and or radially to the D line of said highwayfthenae southerly along said straight line 100 feet, more• said point.;oppositn Engineer's Station P T 80 +87.91:thence southerly parallel to said D line, a • distance of 70 feet, more or less,. to a point opposite Highway , -Station .D,79+61.8; thence southerly on a straight line which''intersects . a•paint opposite Highway Engineer'• Station D P T 72 +34.7 and 97.feot westerly there- from, a distance of 150 feet, more or less, to the south line of said tract 4; thence westerly along said south line 310 feet.. more or less, to the southwest corner of said tract 4; thence northerly along the west line of said tract 4, a distance of 329.25 feet to the point of beginning. • Statutory Warranty Deed 5917026 tth.)4 Vim z May 25, 1959, as modified • . This deed is givcn in fulfillment of that cernin real estate contract between the parties hereto, dated/ ▪ by instrument dated October (9.,. .19 62, and conditioned for the conveyance of the above .. ,,.. described propeny, and the covenants of warranty herein cootained shall not apply to any title, interest or Ir.. encumbrance arising by. through or under the purchaser in said contract, and shall nor apply to any taxes, ,:.. 2SSCSSMCMS Of other charges levied, assessed or bccoming due subsequent to the date of said contract , , a ll ;.'• ... unici..t to all casements, restrictions and reservations of record, if any. t' 1)ated this • V.: AFF. J. i.• itid ccurify 1REASU: STATE. OF WASHINGTON, ss. . County of • .. • • • day of * 1962. • • • On this day personally.appeared before me PEARL McKERCHIER , an unmarried woman, to nit. known to he the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and at know!ctigeti t11.11 she signed the same as her free and voluntary aa and deed, for the utt.ittul purpoA:tlharin mentioned. i.,.;,.....;...z...1.1s.;#.2,..u.i.4........0)ny hand and official seal this 0 01 : „ /C/to.1962. -.A ,.:• : Iva • in and for Se State of Walking:um. •".• ' .0 ?tiding at Ned for tioanf .Pc/ 19 --- AJA. •,. I ' Stequest a SEATTLE TULE COMPANY ' ROBERT A. MOREL'S, County harbor • ••••■• e ; • ..v0i.4706 rw,E647 . ' • 5335369 WiSEEIKaraN 'arm INSURANCE Comm Statutory Quit Claim Deed C3 THE GRANTOR , ]it.T.DOIO7, husband of JILIf BODDT, for and in consideration of late and affection, ($ ) =Ms and Quit claim i to. JFZX BDDDT,hia wife, and ooetspgity interest all interest in the following described rat estate, situated in the County of State of SVashtingtoa: Troat 4(tonr) of Seattle Lad Company'. firs -sus• trawta,as per plat riaordedi in Tol=e 6 of Plata on page 90,reoorde of Ring Connty,aitaated in the County of Ring and State of Washington, Dated this i'sad STATE OF WASHINGTONa }era - County of fling. 5335369 v4196 pact559 • dal of January, On this day petsotufly - appeared before me Y. T. Buddy • to me known to be the indiridual deacnled in and who executed the within and foregoing instmums, anti ackrawle.lred that he signed the same as hie free and volunzry act and deed, for the Cues and prrposes therein mentioned. • • GIVEN under my hand and ilt{e tbL dday of XL og ,. .I n K • ; A �� • January .1948. + , 5329028 i Superior Court of the State of ' rby assl� ° . ranste,Bs sd $ i wer to Pearl McKercher, Individually, named Deceased), (in accordance with the terms of the vill of the above second part y . a9� p t aIi?31FrPh2stRFPA£ VZotered into on the 25th day of May, 17 59., twtwern Jean BQddy, wife of lf.V.Boddy, as her separate estate, as teller , and as purchaser3 Ralph A. Lt`igle and Flora A. Engle, his :ur the ale and purcla.e of the following real estate situated in C •t:r::p 1Cashington. to -wit: Tract 4, Seattle Land Company's Five Acre Tracts, as per Plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plats, page 90, records of :::n, County; SELLE'R'S ASSIGNMENT OF REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND DEED State 7:' Wash :ounty of E 1 th 414► i r •.. .!iiR • • wife, King ::o:e: There is nd consideration, for the above Assirnnilnt, wol.ch is given as part of ::istrib•:tive share of the said grantee ebo ^e named in connection with the estate of Jean. Soddy , Deceased, above, in order to complete the rec•:rd. in such ca_acft; :.i•: are: ;arty /cnm•e}•s and warrant said described premises to aid second party euh;ctt to aid contract and second part y hereby assumes and agree s to fulfill the conditions of.-aid real estate ' be r, 1961. cutrix if the Estate Jean.. 3?, Deceased. :iotartal 2, :a?. ;.o ar;"Fiblic in and the St.,te of ilashinctor., residin7 at . ^.e ' ......d tot es:ore,., • .- . 4. 111/ °'! a '. N ?.c•.',:; r�' `-/ .. -� •e A o.- re, '�. -.. t � s a") . T . ,:.1cn�.sa l Mb . h�.$ s r 't crf ^ QS inhe 'a"z }e . d a -.. Z or o f - k4d � 3 ,r r,y��nt e: � ry F =; at�L r Cg ;e d u�g`t $g C ii;' 9 `,'i5 et} drC r'aKd 3!Utgd erti . - a : um.er. toy :i~e: z w 6 00 U) 0 = 1.11 N W W O • a = W Z�. I— O Z I— W 0 O N. 0 F-. WW 11. . • Z. W U= O ~ Z JUL 1 9 `2U1Jii OPUS PARK 5/405 PERMIT CENTER SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA RCW 197 -11 -960 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: OPUS PARK 5/405 2. Name of applicant: OPUS Northwest LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: a:'sepai.doc nrie ED Crrf OF 10 RICA Applicant: Contact: Andy Taber. Lisa Verner OPUS Northwest LLC Commercial Development Solutions 915 118 Avenue SE, Suite 300 PO Box 70372 Bellevue, WA 98005 Seattle, WA 98107 425- 453 -4100 206 - 286 -8575 andy.taber @opusnw.com lisa @cdspermits.coln 4. Date checklist prepared: July 18, 2001 5. Agency Requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction of building in Spring, 2002 for occupancy in Summer, 2002 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. o OPUS may apply for permits to construct a building at the corner of 51S Avenue South and South 151 Street in the future. While they are two separate projects, they are in the same vicinity and will be constructed by OPUS. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • City of Tukwila Wetland Delineation Report, prepared by B &A, Inc (BA #3378) • Preliminary Findings Geotechnical Engineering Study I -5 /I -405 Development Site Tukwila, Washington, prepared by Terra Associates, Inc (T -4800) • OPUS Park 5/405 Level 1 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Control Plan, prepared by Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc, April 2001 • OPUS Park I -5/1 -405 Traffic Impact Analysis City of Tukwila, prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc, February 22, 2001 No. OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 2 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. f.( SEPA Environmental Review Design Review Building Permit Street Use Permit Tree Permit Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation Permit Sewer and Water District Approvals Sign Permit Give a brief complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist . that ask you to describe certain aspects of you proposal. You do not need to repeat, . those answers on this page. The proposed OPUS Park 5/405 project is a 3.3 acre commercial development consisting of one office building and adjacent parking. The uses will be as permitted in the "Office " of the City of Tukwila Zoning Code. The proposed is 65,600 square feet with three levels for a total building height of 35 feet. Parking stalls provided total 199 and there will be two truck OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist Yrarr+ cz+Rxcgxcgart>ea�s VR ' z w e 6 0 O 0 N 0 . U) W LLI W D 2 g F ▪ w Z = I— W U • 0 O D- O I— ELI w I— IL 8 z .. w (—L O L r z OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 3 docks (one on either side of the building). There will be two entries from 51' Avenue South. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, the tax lot number and section, township, and range. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located west of Interstate 5 and to the east of 51S Avenue South at 14910 51 Avenue S. The northern project boundary is approximately 200 feet to the north of South 148 Street and the south boundary is approximately 400 feet to the south4The project site is in the northwest quarter of Section 23, Township ,23 North, Range 4 East, WM, in Tukwila, Washington. A legal description, a topographic map and a vicinity map are included on the site plan drawings submitted with this Checklist. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes. The environmentally sensitive map indicates possible steep slopes bk.JtAJA adjacent to 51" Avenue South and a possible stream parallel to Interstate 5. 7 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent of the slope)? The steepest slope is approximately 30% and covers about.40..feet before flattening out. It is located in the northwest corner of the site and is a result of the fill used for 51" Avenue S. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck ?) If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. OPUSTukwila/SEPAChecklist • d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate the source of fill. A Fill will be imported to the site to provide a level building pad. Approximately 20 000 cubic yards of fill will be brought onsite. • _ 44 \ G t,Ti � Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Erosion will not occur as a result of the office use on the site. It is not anticipated that erosion will occur during clearing or construction because a temporary erosion. and_sedimentation plan (TESCP) will be in effect. The TESCP will include barriers to the wetlands adjacent to the site. g. What percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Describe proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impact to earth, if any. 2. AIR OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 4 Ur — Urban Land, according to the USDA SCS King County Soils Survey Map (see Level 1 Drainage Report). (The site was filled prior to 1979.) Approximately 77% of the site will be covered by impervious surface after construction. A temporary erosion and sedimentation plan (TESCP) will be used during clearing, grading, filling, and construction to control erosion. The amount of fill to be used is the least amount possible to create a level building pad. The building has an entry on the second level on the west side and an entry on the first level on the east side in order to reduce the amount of fill needed. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the. proposal (i.e. dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The "Office" zoning limits the type of uses allowed on site, and this controls emissions. Limiting the grading filling through building design will also help to reduce and control, emissions. 3. WATER 0 Surface OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 5 Upon completion, the only anticipated emissions will be from cars using the parking lot and the occasional truck using the truck dock areas. Uses in the office building will not generate emissions. During construction, emissions will come from construction vehicles during the grading and filling stage and from construction workers' vehicles as they arrive and depart the site. 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If.yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream of river it flows_ " into. 1) There is a(small wetland (Type 3) east of the north portion of the site (Weiland A. .2) There is also a wetland (Type 2) south of the site (Wetland 13). 3) There is a s. cjp watersunQf£.ditch (Type 3 watercourse) which bisects the middle of the site and runs from west to east; it is clearly manmade and actively maintained. 4) There is also a ditch (Type 3 watercourse) with storm water runoff in the southwest corner of the site. \, . All of these waters flow into the man -made ditch (Type 3 watercourse) on the. west side of Interstate 5. This ditch eventually flows into Gilliam Creek. For additional information, please see the "City of Tukwila Wetland Delineation Report" prepared by B &A, Inc and submitted with this Checklist. ce ) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the scribed waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist L 5,° •••' 1 \\ V i cl✓b ln:r' si.44:4 i ..0 t..rizwi .:.s.`: .XS1tilactt e4tt id ' 4 "^.Y.41t:..1 `. . z w re wi0 00 W ❑ CO W tu f— W O = ▪ W z � Z U.1 • w U ❑ 0 S ❑ I— W U W Z U (13 . o z • aw 1 Vim} } ' g Yes. 1) The project is within 200 feet of the small wetland (Wetland A) but outside any required buffer area (this wetland is on.property not owned by the applic_ant). 2) The project is within 200 feet of the southern wetland (Wetland B) but does not encroach within the required 50 foot buffer. 3) The northern manmade ditch (Type 3_watercourse) will be piped as it crosses_the site with continued - discharge of -the upstream into .a new drainage swale /stream to be created„for_mitigation purposes) which will connect with the ditch paraltel_to1- 5. Regarding the southern ditch (Type 3 watercourse), limited grading will occur within the buffer area as it daylights after exiting the culvert under 51s Avenue South. The southern_entry- site will be partially located in the buffer on the. north side of the this ditch; a retaining wall will used _ to- separate - the .ditch -from the . new development and water passage will be unimpeded. The project plans are included with this submittal and should be viewed in conjunction with the City of Tukwila Wetland Delineation Report. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste material to surface waters? If yes, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. b. Ground OPUSTukwila/S EPACheckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 6 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Groundwater will not be withdrawn. A detention vault will control on -site peak storm water runoff rates at their existing rates. The facility will be designed using the KCRTS Level 1 flow control standard controlling both the 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. c. Water Run -Off (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of run -off (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will fte°' this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Existing conditions include two ditches which carry jApst„rea .stormwater._: -. • runoff across the site from west of 51s Avenue venue South eastward to the ditch that parallels Interstate 5. The northern ditch will be piped as it crosses the project site and the southern ditch will remain daylighted; both will continue to carry upstream storm water runoff and not connect with the on -site system. On -site, run -off will come from the building roof and from parking areas. This runoff will be cleaned, flow into a detention vault, and be released at existing run -off rates. The vault will discharge to the ditch along Interstate 5 east of the project. The ditch eventually flows into Gilliam Creek. 2) Could waste material enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. The building will be connected to a sanitary sewer system. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run -off water impacts, if any: rj 2 -year and the 10 -year release rates at the existing rate. More detail is found in the "Level 1 Drainage Analysis and Stormwater Control Plan" by Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates which accompanies this Checklist. X •`'' An on -site storm water detention system will control water run -off and release run -off generated from the building and parking areas at the pre- development \, rate. This will control run -off and not impact the site beyond current conditions. 4. PLANTS None. The building will be connected to a sanitary sewer system. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 7 5. ANIMALS None. OPUSTukwila/S EPAChcckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 8 x trees: alder, maple, aspen, other: apple, oak x evergreen trees: fir, cedar, pine, other: x shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The existing deciduous and coniferous trees will be removed, except those within the wetland /stream buffer areas. The grasses and shrubs around the existing buildings will also be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Landscaping, including the use of native plants, will be used to enhance and replace vegetation on the site. Landscaping will include native trees (Douglas fir, western red cedar, crepe myrtle) and native ground cover (Oregon grape, knick- knick) in addition to a small lawn area/berm at the entry. The landscaping concepts are shown on the landscape plan which was submitted with this Checklist. a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: _ x _ birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 1•41` .�:jr . h'Y. eks�rr,vsp� e���..i.;cfr.:.f��. _.�,x r �.;w.. .�n.4..., »�a,. ;..r • • vw ' ..:Y.a:.StA ..t* OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 9 c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Buffers will be maintained around the adjacent off -site wetland and around the on -site ditch/stream. The buffers will allow continued wildlife habitat. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity will be used as the source of energy for the project. It will be used to run the HVAC system. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The building design complies with the Washington State Energy Code. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: l� O PUSTu kwi l a/S E P ACheckl i st None. Hazardous materials will not be used on -site. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example, traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Traffic noise from Interstate 5 currently exists in the area. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. - - c�...c u �.. ({ %.4- 4..r... r Noise from construction vehicles will occur on a temporary, short-term basis Jk `1 during construction. Construction would occur between 7:00 AM and 8:00 ; ;;:. :..c ` ' PM. Long -term noise would come from building workers arriving and leaving �ytif� (.4 in their vehicles; generally this noise would occur between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 10 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The current use of the site is residential and vacant. North: residential /vacant East: Interstate 5 South: vacant West: residential /vacant b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, property owners indicate the site was logged and cleared for pasture land approximately 100 years ago. There are remnants of small orchards on the site. (51 Avenue S was built approximately 75 years ago and I -5 was constructed approximately 40 years ago.) c. Describe any structures on the site. OPUSTukwila/SE PAChcckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE H There are currently six (6) single family residences and four (4) outbuildings on the site; 2 of the residences are abandoned and 4 are occupied. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? All of the residences and outbuildings will be removed. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Office (0) f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Office (0) g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. The environmentally sensitive map indicates possible steep slopes adjacent to 51 Avenue South and a possible stream parallel to Interstate 5. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Between 200 and 250 people will work in the completed project. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? There are 9 people who live in the 4 occupied residences and they will move when construction begins. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any. The majority of the existing residences are rented with the understanding that development may occur in the near future. The existing zoning calls for Office Uses on the site; property owners have been trying to obtain development ��- t- m f\14 � approval for years. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land use plans, if any. OPUSTukwila/SEPAChecklist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 12 The project is an office project; this is consistent with existing land uses south of South 151 Street and with the Zoning and Comprehensive Plan designations. '~ w 9. HOUSING 6 o � a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? w -J � IL None. i n 0 2 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low income housing. I- w. Six (6) units of housing will be removed. They are rentals and provide middle z to low income housing. G,,, k/�r°f" - ��sr �9�� _ z 0 w w � 0 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. o • D O I— w w u. O w Z U = a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? z ~ None. 10. AESTHETICS What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The building height is 35 feet. The principal exterior building material is painted concrete. (The building is of tilt -up concrete construction.) b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The views of Interstate 5 by residents west of 51 Avenue South would be altered. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The building will be lowered onto the site to take advantage of the topography; two floors will be visible from 51 Avenue South and three floors will be visible from Interstate 5. Landscaping in conformance with City codes will be located around the building, in the parking areas, and on the site perimeter; landscaping will include native trees (Douglas fir, western..red cedar, crepe myrtle) and native ground cover (Oregon grape, knick- knick)' in addition to a small lawn area/berm at the entry. OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 13 z 11. LIGHT AND GLARE = z � w a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it w 2 J D mainly occur? U O co o Generally, the proposal will not produce glare. Lights will be seen from off- 6.1.A10 ' ;P ... u) z site during evening hours from two sources: security lighting around the site c 3 cn u_ and from windows of any late- working employee. w 0 b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with u Q No. Ill IA UCa Overhead lights and vehicle headlights from Interstate 5 may affect the project. o 5 ww d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. r v —, f , LL O While a lighting plan has not yet been developed, applicant will ensure that ,;0 .)- -° ' r , �., °`' ui z. i R .� ;i v cn lights located adjacent to walkways and in parking areas will be focused v ,L�ri �' , :,,, 5 ' o � downward to light the site and not the surrounding area. Wattages will be as z low as possible and still provide security. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreation opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The closest facilities are ballfields at Thorndyke Elementary School and ,a foot trail on 46t Avenue South between South 148 Street and South 150 Street. There is no direct access between these facilities and the project site due to the hill on the west side of 51s Avenue South. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. O PUSTukwila/S EPACheckl ist co = I -w Z I— O Z I— None. OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 14 z w 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION w —1 U a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local co 0 preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. co LLI 2w w No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, g scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c d = w No. z I— 0 Z I— c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. g U o None. a N '- w I I— �" O Z al co a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access S to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 0 14. TRANSPORTATION The site abuts 51 Avenue South and Interstate 5. Two access points to 51 Avenue South are proposed. These access points are shown on the site plan drawings submitted with this Checklist. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. Metro Transit (System Map, February 1999) identifies on bus route ( #128) in the site vicinity. This route serves S. 144 Street, about seven (7) blocks north of the project. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The project will have 199 parking stalls. It will eliminate approximately 12 stalls (2 per residence). OPUSTukwila/SEPAChcckl ist g. OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 15 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No new roads are required by this project. The project applicant will construct half - street improvements (widening, paving and curb /gutter /sidewalk) along the property frontage abutting 51s Avenue South (minor arterial). These improvements will be dedicated to the City. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Office building tenants may locate in the building because it is close to SeaTac Airport. Water and rail transportation are not nearby. Sound Transit is evaluating a proposal to locate its light rail line in the Interstate 5 right -of -way which abuts the east side of the project site; it is not anticipated that a station would be located in the immediate vicinity. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If own, indicate when peak volumes will occur. Average Weekday trip generation is identified as 626 trips for the office building, with net new trips identified as 575 trips. (Average Weekday trip generation is based on one floor of "light in uses (according to ITE) and Mafloors of "general offce ".uses (also according to ITE).) In the AM Peak Hour, 87 trips would be generated by the office building, and in the PM Peak Hour, 85 trips would be generated. Net new trips in the AM Peak Hour are 83 trips and net new trips in the PM Peak Hour are 79 trips. Additional information is available in the "OPUS Park 1 -5/1 -405 Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. which was submitted with this Checklist. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any. "OPUS Park 1 -5/1 -405 Traffic Impact Analysis" prepared by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc identifies traffic mitigation measures which mitigate the impact of the project. These include construction according to applicable city requirements, site frontage improvements along 51 Avenue South, access driveways per the City's criteria, working with the City and other area developers to include the South 154 Street /52 Avenue South intersection to the City's street improvements program, and payment of a pro - rata contribution to the City's street improvement projects. The applicant agrees to these mitigation measures. OPUSTukwila/SEPAChecklist 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other ?) If so, generally describe. Yes, the project would generally provide the need for a slight increase in public services. Since office uses generate far less demand for public services than residential uses, for example, and this is a small office project, the need for additional personnel and equipment is slight. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public service, if any. None. 16. UTILITIES OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 16 a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. This site is served by Water District #125; water service is available through a Developer Extension and an upgrade of the existing water line in 51 Avenue South to an 8" DI line from South 151 Street to the north edge of the site. The Certificate of Water Availability in included in the Checklist submittal. The site is served by ' Vue Sewer_District sanitary sewer service is available through a Developer Extension (or other agreement with the District) and installation of a sanitary sewer main from the site to the existing manhole at the intersection of 52 Avenue South and South 151 Street. As shown on the drawing submitted with this Checklist, applicant will i.tkstalLthe_sewer line 7 in a microtunnel under the wetland_ the_site and bring the sewer to 51 'Avenue South, in conformance with the District's comprehensive plan. OPUSTukwila/SEPAChcckl ist }- v4.1.11 0.4, C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: OPUSTukwila/SEPACheckl ist OPUS PARK 5/405 SEPA CHECKLIST FOR CITY OF TUKWILA PAGE 17 (Lisa Verner) 2—/T--0/ STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 1 Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail; tukplart(@,ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY ` ,0111 1 11111 CITY OF TUKWILA t 11/13L1G 63/ ss All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, a ents.engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at J1 S/ S 4 ✓e .Sn . 711471)/4 4 1✓I4- for the purpose of application review, for the limited time/necessary to confplete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The'City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. n EXECUTED at,,2$'Dq• .Zb'- 4 J e S0 (city), Sew /.e a on 2 -3 o - 0/ Sett& 2 NS (Print Name) J T /17/0 ,5'/ Stl(v�e , / ,,/ w Gt�G✓ (Address) c206 -.7 4 14- 739 (Phone Number) (Signature) RECEIVED CITY Cr TUKWILA JUL 1 9 2Q01 PERMIT c, ;a t-3 On this day personally appeared before me ��/ to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/s a signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME t S ZQ DAY OF li7 -L' )• 00 IC in and for the State of Washington RY t gat o f *OTAgr "•' � � 1/ y O 1 r / M Co'sbmission expires on 7' '4p0 tx gsx. t ;+ k.41;' ,,.. ; # 'a July 16, 2001 Opus NW, L.L.0 Andy Taber 915 118th Avenue SE, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: MITIGATION PLANTING PLAN TUKWILA SITE 3 378 L4 /a j b/s m h /7/ 16/01 Dear Andy: • A planting plan to mitigate for the tightlining of the north ditch on the above referenced site is being submitted as part of the landscape plan. The plan includes a detailed planting of native plants east of the parking lot. The native plants provide a screen along 1 -5. The planting plan will be self - sufficient after the first several years. C A new stream is to be constructed; per the plan, paralleling the 1 -5 ditch. This new stream replaces and mitigates for the tightlining of the northern ditch. The new stream will be planted on the east side with red willow and the west side with red dogwood. The plantings will provide shade for the stream and potential habitat for wildlife. Additional native plantings will augment the potential for wildlife habitat between the parking lot and 1 -5. A 15 foot buffer will be maintained between the 1 -5 ditch and the parking lot. This will be a no clear zone designated with an orange construction fence. All planting and other activities will be west of the buffer. Best Management Practices will be used to protect the 1 -5 ditch buffer. P. O. Box 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 FAX 253.858.2534 ��'�. _ �:. �`"' �i :::�'q•a,%iy.?c;i�?.i.:.Nic., rzp�pg; ."'�:".9:e:�idis:i�:�e Page Two July 16, 2001 Tukwila Site If additional information is needed, please have the City provide a brief description of the items that need to be addressed. A.J. Bredberg 3378L4 /ajb /smh/7 /16/01 z • - z: • J U; C..) CD CO • U. CO w' W = J � W o g Q, .co a I-- - _ zF- I- o . .z U ❑; .O U! • :0 2 U -O W Z .H_ =` Z BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA (TMC 16.60.050.B) 2. Relationship of the Structure and Site to Adjoining Area OPUS PARK 5/405 1 z July 18, 2001 J 0 This project is consistent with the City of Tukwila's Commercial and Light Industrial co 0 . Design Review Criteria. The following discussion highlights the areas of compliance. w i 1. Relationship to the Site w o 2 A. The site has a desirable transition with the streetscape and provides for u. Q adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. The street (51 Avenue S) co w I c5 ill be improved in front of the building, including donating additional right- w of -way and constructing a sidewalk for pedestrians. Native species ? I landscaping will be planted along the street and around the building. z o Additionally, the building is set back from the street, so that it can take w w advantage of the slope of the site. Passersby will view a two -story building D o from 51ti Avenue S, while viewers from Interstate 5 will see a three -story o P building. w w B. The parking and service areas are located, designed and screened to break up � ? the visual impact of large paved areas. The building is located in the middle 'I. p of the site, thereby breaking up the parking. Small parking areas are located w Z on each side of the building. The service areas are located on the north and v south sides of the buildings, so as to provide two small service /loading areas z F- rather than one large one. Each is screened with a wall. Native landscaping surrounds the building and parking areas. C. The height and scale of the building is in keeping with the sloped site. The building fits into the hillside. Two stories are visible from the west side of the site and three stories are visible from the east side of the site (the Interstate 5 side). This minimizes the visual impact of the building. A. The building provides harmony with the surrounding area through its multilevel entries and use of the slope. The building appears to be two stories in height from the west side, which has existing residential uses. The building shows three stories from the east side, which has interstate traffic traveling by the site. Muted colors will be used on the building. Also, native planting materials will be used to further harmonize with existing features in the area. B. As mentioned above, the landscaping material will be primarily native plantings. This will maximize the transition to existing foliage on adjacent properties. Additionally, the new mitigation stream will be planted with Attachment E f DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA — OPUS PARK 5/405 Page 2 appropriate species which will enhance the existing wetlands to the north and south. C. This new building will be in the most northerly location in the existing office zone along 51s Avenue S. In a sense it will pioneer the character of future office development. Because of its integration with the slope, use of muted colors, and native plant landscaping, this new project will establish an appropriate character for the area. D. Vehicular, pedestrian and loading circulation patterns were considered during the design of this site. Pedestrian access to the building from 51' Avenue S is direct and crosses the least amount of parking area; pedestrians will enter on the second floor of the building. There are two vehicular accesses to the site, both of which allow vehicles to circulate easily onsite. There are two loading areas for large trucks, one on each side of the building. This allows dual use without blocking other vehicular circulation; these areas are separate from the pedestrian areas. E. As mentioned above, there will be two vehicular accesses to the site. Each access will direct vehicles to different areas of the site, thus avoiding congestion within the site. The onsite circulation is compatible with the street circulation. 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment A. This proposal has recognized and incorporated the existing topographic patterns which contribute to the beauty and utility of a development. The building uses the slope to great advantage, by building into the hillside. Two stories are visible on the uphill side and three stories are visible from the downhill side. A sea of asphalt is avoided due to placement of the building in the middle of the site. This site design recognizes and preserves the existing topographic features. B. The grades of the walkways, parking spaces, and driveways will meet city standards. The building will have ADA access. The landscaping will provide a pleasing atmosphere around the building; the use of native plant materials will provide visual continuity with the adjacent sites. C. The landscaping will enhance the building's features, integrate with existing vegetation on adjacent sites, and provide some shade in the parking areas. The landscape architect has drawn inspiration from the existing vegetation on the site and adjacent areas. Additionally, the new stream on the east side of the site will provide visual relief from Interstate 5. D. In locations where vehicles or pedestrians may damage plantings, care will be taken to provide durable plant materials. E. On this site, plantings will be limited on the east side of the northern parking areas due to the need for a retaining wall. Plantings along 5ls Avenue S will be enhanced so as to provide more of a visual buffer of the parking area. Additionally, plantings will be installed within the northern parking area. DesignReviewCriteria.doe DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA — OPUS PARK 5/405 Page 3 F. A wall parallel to the building will screen each the two service /loading areas. These areas are also tucked into the hillside, which also provides screening. G. At the time of application submittal, plantings are anticipated to be used in all areas. The applicant will consider other screening techniques if asked by the Board of Architectural Review. H. While a lighting plan has not yet been developed, the applicant will ensure that lights located adjacent to walkways and in parking areas will be focused downward to light the site and not the surrounding area. Wattages will be as low as possible and still provide security. 4. Building Design A. The new building will be 35' in height and is based on the relationship to the existing, sloped site. As discussed above, the building will be set into the hillside to take advantage of the existing slope. B. Because of its use of the hillside, the new building is in scale with the permanent residential buildings west of 51 Avenue S. From this direction, only two stories of the new building will be visible. Also, the building (on its east side) is compatible with the existing office buildings located south of S. 151 St. On this side, three stories are visible. C. The building is well - proportioned and consistent with current office building design practices. The many windows will give the building an open feeling, as well as allow users to view the surrounding area. The building will be constructed of tilt -up concrete, which is very durable and long - lived. It will be painted as well. D. Colors will be muted and complement the surrounding area. E. Mechanical equipment and other utility equipment will be screened. F. Exterior lighting has not yet been designed. However, it will complement the building. G. The design of this building avoids monotony through fitting the building into the existing site slope. A significant number of windows, muted colors, and banding at the cornice will provide architectural interest. Overall, the building fits well into this site. 5. Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture A. Miscellaneous structures in addition to the new building are not anticipated. Any street lights which are installed as part of the frontage street improvements will be approved by the City. The applicant wants the new building to enhance the area and provide a well - designed office environment. B. As mentioned above, any streetlights which are required will be of a design approved by the city and consistent with city standards. R I)esiyiReviewCritcria.doc '~' w 6 UO w -I I- I— CJ) LL, w � = I— Il Z � 0 Z I- w w 0 CI O - o F- w w I— � Il. w z U= O~ z • V G • June 18, 2001 TO: Mayor Steven M. Mullet and members of Tukwila City Council : I recognize that the demands on your time are great; however I beg your indulgence for this long letter. The subject cannot be properly presented in a few words, certainly not in the three minutes I might be allowed when we are not-on your agenda. Subject: The land use issue involving approx. 11 acres of land adjacent to 51 Ave. S. in Tukwila. Development of the land is being blocked by wetlands concerns affecting a major part of the property. This issue has been brought to the Council's attention before when the property owners requested exception to the wetlands presence on the grounds that the City has been and continues to discharge an increasing amount of water onto the property which did not contain wetland as recently as 20 years ago. Review: When this issue was raised with the council in March of this year, the property owners were advised that the course of action should be to present the matter to the Utilities Committee which would consider staff input and make a recommendation concerning the problem. THIS IS NOT WORKING. It is not the fault of the Committee. Staff has told the committee that no request to develop has been denied because no request for permit to develop the whole site has been received. This is true. However, staff has repeatedly made clear to the developer that wherever engineering survey shows that land could be declared wetland, it would be so declared and the only issue would be extent, class and buffer zone size. As a result, the developer, OPUS who have invested over $150,000 and much time in trying to develop THE WHOLE SITE, is unwilling to go to the considerable expense of proposing a development plan that includes use of land that staff has indicated will be ruled wetland. Thus, staff will still be able to say there has been no request for development of that portion of the property, and so denial. THE ISSUE OF WHAT ACTION THE CITY WOULD TAKE TO COMPENSATE FOR THE FACT THAT THE LAND HAS BEEN RENDERED WET (AT LEAST PARTLY ) THROUGH THE ACTION OF THE CITY DISCHARGING WATER ONTO THE - PROPERTY WILL NEVER BE ADDRESSED. Of course, staff can point out that their area of responsibility does not include deciding what action the city will take as a result of city responsibility for impacting the property. As a result of the current situation, the developer has indicated to the owners that they will probably not go ahead with the plan to build on the one site that has been cleared for development, and will abandon the whole project. Request Council Consideration: The property owners request that the Council act on the issue of the discharge of surface water onto private property as a mitigating circumstance in the artificial creation of a condition that could lead to a wetland formation where no such condition had existed in the past. In spite of the fact that Mr. Lancaster has stated to one of the property owners that the Council has NO SAY in the matter and that it is only through courtesy that the issue is even presented to the Committee; the owners believe that only the Council can decide this issue. :.:StT'iw"' ',%a .7 O�'�. NL.,- . land will become wet. This has happened here. In addition, the construction of the freeway, on fill, blocked natural drainage from the property, and the state has not maintained the drainage ditch that was constructed along the west side of the freeway thus reducing the flow off of the land. The property owners have /can offer ample evidence that even years after the freeway was built the land was not wet. Therefore, the combined effects of increased flow onto the property and reduced drainage, in whatever amount, have clearly brought about the wet state that is seen today. We do not believe that the city acted maliciously in discharging the water onto our property. Neither the city nor the property owners foresaw that this wetlands issue would arise. However, the problem exists. The city may be able to get by with discharging water on our property, but in fairness it should not. Why should we be selected among Tukwila property owners to have our land value destroyed? This is what the Council is about; determining what the city stands for. Does the city allow citizens to be harmed because it is expedient and because the city is powerful and the citizen is not. Does the city have the care that it claims to have for its citizen's rights and prosperity? Alternative: If after due consideration of all of the issues raised here, the Council still wishes to avoid the question of allowing development of all of the property, which we could have done 20 years ago before ecology became god, there is an alternative. Please consider the action currently taking place in Seattle, as described in the PI of June 14, this year, pp. Al & A18. The article describes the situation in which the City of Seattle was allowing a developer to build on only a portion of his property because the other part contained nesting sites of herons. While granting the permit to develop, the city has also entered in to negotiation to buy the whole site to provide a green belt area. In our case the city could pay fair market value for any portion of the property that it is unwilling to allow to be developed, or could buy the whole site. Conclusion: The property owners ask the Council to please act to resolve this issue. We have lost one major Developer, Tramell Crow, over the wetland issue and now we are in danger of losing Opus entirely, or face having our retirement investments reduced by 50% or more. Sincerely; Dwayne F. and Ruth I. Hayes 16634 53 Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 z I z ' 6U 00 w • Lu J i- � w w LQ = z = f—O z i— w w U o o to o }— wW .. z w U 0 z Juno e -mail printed Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:45:45 , page 1 From: <DJROCHON @juno.com> Subject: June 14, 2001 John McFarland City Administrator 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Wa 98188 Dear John McFarland, We went to a council meeting in March and a Utility Meeting the next day to ask about the water coming onto our property from pipes coming under the road on 51st Ave., between 151 and 144th Sts. Engineers found the pipes this spring when they were clearing black berries. We knew our property was getting wetter but thought it was mostly the freeway ditch. Three years ago 1 talked to Steve Lancaster. I sent him a letter concerning the water and the state clearing the ditch. He said he would help me against Washdot if I had any problems. That letter if it was kept should still be in the files. At that time someone in Tukwila had to know that the water was coming from those pipes onto our land. We were never informed. Some where around 1992, Tukwila put black top and catch basins onto west side of 51st. At that time it was diverted to the pipes under the road. It has been draining down on us concentrated ever since. Once again we were never informed. There has always been water coming down that hill, but evaporated or went into the ground before all coming down to our property as it does now. There are more houses, black top, and septic tanks on top of the hill now also. On the description of our land, when we bought it - says Water problem: No. We're not disputing it is now wet. We want to know what Tukwila is going to do about stopping that water from coming onto our property and making it a wetland. This property was bought for retirement purposes and now we are told we can't do anything with it or make any money. We went to Jack Pace, Planning and he said if it was three different parcels we could get a reasonable use permit to build on the 2 pieces of • property that are being considered as "wetlands ". We went to King County Court House and got copies of all three parcels, all have different parcel Ws, No - that wasn't good enough - that's for tax purposes. Refused us a reasonable use permit. Title insurance company says they are all different parcels. King County says they are all different parcels. Only Tukwila says no because it serves their purpose to say so. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA MAYOR'S OFFICE Juno e-mail printed Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:45:45 , page 2 Every time we come over, we are told something, we do it, it's never right, always change it to suit them and then we have to do something else. This keeps going on. What is it we have to do to get some action and a straight forward answer? We are willing to work with Tukwila but we have to know they are willing to work with us. We have said this all along but they keep putting hurdles in our way and OPUS'S. They "say" • z they are willing but it doesn't look like it. If they would put in cc w 2 writing what we have to do and when we do it, don't change it. 6 co J U w w • a _ � I- Ill Z = Z w • w o • 5 o 1- w w L I z w H = O F- z We have paid separate taxes on these 3 pieces for over 35 years. Tukwila Storm and Surface charges us 3 separate bills. The 2 lots are higher than the big piece we live on. Single family - commercial? It is zoned commercial on King County records, on Tukwila's it is office buildings. We have talked to a lawyer and he says this is the issue that has to be addressed first. Adolphson's, Andy Castelle, Director of Natural Resources, also said it had to be addressed no matter what Tukwila does with our property. Everyone we talk to says it's not right for Tukwila to do this but we can't get Tukwila to do anything about it. We want this issue addressed before it is made wetlands so we don't have to protest it after the fact. OPUS has spent over $175,000 so far trying to do the "right" thing and jumped through all the "hoops" the departments have asked them to and still are no farther ahead. We have lost 4 contracts and are in danger of losing this one too. They have stopped the contract but are willing so far to renew it. We want this resolved so we can put it for sale to some one else if need be and know what is usable or not. Sin erel ei �ni d eanifi� Raymond and Iola Hayward cc: Mayor Steve Mullet Council Member's Joe Duffy Pam Carter Dave Fenton Jim Haggerton Joan Hemandez Pamela Linder Richard Simpson Received: from mx.serv.net by CT - BM1; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:59:08 -0700 Received: from botham (dialup526.serv.net [207.207.70.91)) by mx.serv.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA03595; Mon, 28 May 2001.11:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:59:24 -0700 Message -ID: < 01C0E765 .41819B60.botham @serv.net> From: Ginger Botham <botham @serv.net> To: " 'llauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us'" <llauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Cc: "wyk parker @colliers.com" <wyk parker @colliers.com> Subject: Please forward, thanks Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:58:08 -0700 X- Mailer: Microsoft Internet E- mail /MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME - Version: 1.0 Content -Type: text /plain; charset = "us- ascii" Content - Transfer - Encoding: 7bit Dear Ms. Lauterbach, (llauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us) Please forward this letter to all the members of the Tukwila City Council as well as those on the Utilities Committee. Thank you. To: City of Tukwila - Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Committee Chair Joe Duffie Pam Carter Date: May 28, 2001 Subject: Man -made Drainage problems onto the parcels along 51st Ave. S. Thank you for allowing us to speak and explain the problematic background of the approximate 11 -acre parcel Opus wishes to develop. Executive Summary * The City of Tukwila has all the necessary authority within its existing codes to mitigate an economic / ecological partnership with OPUS to solve the man -made drainage problems along 51st Avenue South. * OPUS stands ready to work with the City of Tukwila to create a series of holding ponds along the I -5 corridor to deal with the man -made and compounded surface water drainage problems, by incorporating the ponds and costs into a development. * The Hugh G. Gold & Associates, Inc. detailed and factually based study has all the necessary research and scientific basis to support the City of Tukwila's decision to solve the man -made drainage problems. To prepare for the Utilities Committee meeting we attended, we carefully re -read the Hugh G. Gold & Associates, Inc. (Opus) Wetland Delineation Report (93 pages), reviewed the Schroeter wetlands delineation map (marked with wetlands delineations of green /Opus and blue /Trammell Crow), reviewed the Steve Lancaster /City of Tukwila 4 -page memorandum dated 5/1/2001, and reviewed the Adolf son Associates Peer Review report (11 pages), and then we looked up the Tukwila code referenced but not fully cited by Adolfson Associates, Inc. I am asking you to review the wetlands /drainage problem deterring development of these parcels after you have re -read the Tukwila code referenced by Adolf son Associates, Inc. 18.06. 920Watercourse. "Watercourse" means a course or route formed by nature or modified by man, generally consisting of a channel with a bed and banks or sides substantially throughout its length along which surface water flows naturally other than the Green /Duwamish River. The channel or bed need not contain water year- round. Watercourses do not include irrigation ditches, stormwater runoff channels or devices, or other entirely artificial watercourses unless they are used by salmonids or to convey or pass through stream flows naturally occurring prior to construction of such devices. (Ord. 1758 ?1(part), 1995) 18.06.930Wetlands. "Wetlands" means those areas that are inundated or saturated by groundwater or surface water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include bogs, swamps, marshes, ponds, lakes and similar areas. Constructed wetlands are not considered wetlands for the purposes of this chapter. However, those artificial wetlands intentionally created from nonwetland areas to mitigate conversion of wetlands as permitted by the City shall be considered wetlands. (Ord. 1758 ?1(part), 1995) Both the Opus Wetland Delineation Report and property owners documented to you the lack of a stream or stream bed, fish, and wetlands plants within the 11 acres. The only plant mentioned in every report is the blackberry, a plant capable of living anywhere in King County. All of us told you that our lands had been dry and productive prior to 1 -5; we told you that the amount of dirty surface water routed onto our land via ditches (no easements were granted to King County or to City of Tukwila) from uphill road /development has increased enormously since Tukwila covered the ditches along 51st Avenue South approximately ten years ago. The code referenced in the Adolf son Associates Peer Review report supports our belief that Tukwila code will allow this property to be developed. The 3 ditches feeding dirty water onto our land do not meet Tukwila's definition of Watercourse or Wetland. Our land, purchased approximately 25 years ago, was used to grow hay. (There were no blackberries.) Cows provided milk for butter made in the Z I1- W UO U) ❑ J = F-' N W W O CD = W Z Z1 Lu ❑ ON ❑ 1- W I— L" O .Z U = 0 Z "1906 carriage house" at 14702 51st Ave South (now demolished). When we first moved into Tukwila, we walked the entire 3 parcels and didn't get muddy. A flowering crab apple tree happily grew on the east edge what you call "wetland A "; a crabapple tree is not a wetland plant. An enormous quantity of dirty water has been diverted onto our property. We did not buy our land to provide free dirty surface water retention for anyone. We bought an old fashioned house and two dry lots with the intent to build a retirement nest egg. During our ownership, our land has been zoned single family residential, multi - family residential, office, and then mixed use. We have paid our taxes for surface water management with the expectation that government would fix the problems it had created or inherited. We all recognize that a drainage problem exists; we expect to work together to solve the drainage problem that the property owners did not create. We do not have a wetland problem because the dirty drainage water ditched onto our land does not meet Tukwila's definition of a wetland 18.06.920Watercourse and 18.06.930Wetlands) and never has. You know and we know that your code allows for careful and creative development to occur. We have seen it in past development nearby within Tukwila. Tukwila 18.45.O10.B says 5.Protect the public against avoidable losses, public emergency rescue and relief operations cost, and subsidy cost of public mitigation from landslide, subsidence, erosion and flooding. 18.45.040.A.1 says in part Land alteration is permitted for public access, supplemental planting and approved land uses as provided in TMC 18.45.080. 18.45.040.B says B.Special Buffer Studies - Applicants for a use or development on a legal lot of record within a sensitive area maximum buffer shall be required to conduct a sensitive area study to provide a buffer analysis for the sensitive area. This study may be waived by the Director pursuant to TMC 18.45.020F.2. 18.45.040.C.4 says in part a. The Director may reduce the standard wetland /watercourse buffers on a case -by -case basis, provided the buffer does not contain slopes 20% or greater. The approved buffer width shall not result in greater than a 50% reduction in width, and the reduced buffer shall not be less than 15 feet for wetlands and ten feet for watercourses. Any buffer reduction proposal must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director that it will not result in direct or indirect, short -term or long -term adverse impacts to wetlands or watercourses, and that (1)The buffer is vegetated and includes an enhancement plan as may be required to improve the buffer function and value; or (2)If there is no significant vegetation in the buffer, a buffer may be reduced only if an enhancement plan is provided. The plan must include using a variety of native vegetation that improves the functional attributes of the buffer and provides additional protection for the wetland or watercourse functions and values. The supposed wetlands vegetation under discussion is blackberry bushes that have overgrown a once dry hayfield. I doubt the City of Tukwila desires blackberry re- planting. Substantial surface water drainage onto our land from City ditches deters re- planting hay, the land's condition 25 years ago. What we are proposing is for the Utilities Committee and Tukwila City Council to direct their Planning and Development departments to work with developers who are ready to resolve these problems in meaningful and beneficial ways, and at these developer's expense. Most of these county, state and federal created problems, which Tukwila inherited and has been trying to remedy, can be resolved. For example: using this ecological / economic partnership, a developer might construct a series of narrow looping 'rice' patty -like holding ponds along the I -5 corridor to allow water to filter and seep into the ground as was the normal situation prior to I -5 and county road constructions. Then similar gravel bedded flow or underground culverts would feed road water into these ponds at intervals designed to alleviate pooling and stagnant water / mosquito problems. These water management areas would be scenically and ecologically bordered with appropriate plants to further enhance the natural process, which has been distributed by man made problems. And large areas could be re- claimed to provide productive benefits to the community. Thus, two area of concern would be solved for mutual benefit to the City of Tukwila and it's citizens. The first being a much better surface water management within the confines of these designated areas. The second would be a more productive use of the land within Tukwila while increasing revenues to fund better city services and provide employment opportunities. I am respectfully petitioning the Utilities Committee to move expeditiously to pass along such a policy to the entire Tukwila City Council with an Approve and Implement Recommendation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Virginia and Richard Botham property owners since 1975 at 14702 - 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98168 and surrounding acreage. 16334 Linden Ave. N. Shoreline, WA 98133 206-542-7793 botham@serv.net r. 4 Hud' %3w 06/',9/01 09:05 FAX 425 453 171 "'s• OPUS NW LLC • TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY /4450 N.E. 29 Place 1 Bellevue, WA 98007 1 425- 646 -8591 1 fax 425- 646 -8593 1 800 -441 -7701 \C\ `f \ June 6, 2001 Andy Taber Opus Northwest L.L.C. 915 118 Avenue SE, #300 Bellevue, WA 98004 Re: Rochon/Opus Transnation No. 870139 Dear Mr. Taber: Sincerely, J. Jay Pugh Commercial Title Officer We have researched the "legal lot" status for the property covered in the above referenced Commitment. Following is a summary of our findings: A. William Powell and Eunice Powell, husband and wife, acquired all of Lot 7 of Seattle Land Company's 5 -acre Tracts by Deed recorded October 14, 1958 under Recording No. 4953818; B. The Powell's acquired the North 'A of the South '/z of Tract 6 (except the West 283 feet thereof and except the portion conveyed for highway) of said plat by Deed recorded June 7, 1966 under Recording No. 6038425; C. The Powell's acquired the South A of the South % of Tract 6 (except the West 283 feet thereof and except the portion conveyed for highway) of said plat by Deed recorded June 7, 1966 under Recording No. 6038426; and D. The Powell's conveyed the West 300 feet of said Lot 7 by Deed recorded March 3, 1967 under Recording No. 6145823. The descriptions for the three tax parcels shown in the Commitment as exceptions no. 2, 3 and 4 are consistent with the legal descriptions created in or by the above referenced deeds. The above referenced Deeds may be submitted to the appropriate governmental agency as evidence that the property covered in the above referenced Commitment existed as three separate lots prior to July 1, 1974, the year that the subdivision amendatory act became effective. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 425- 646 - 8591. a 002 , • `, hd h2tArc 6145823 Filed for Reoord at Requesl of THE GRANTOR WILLIAM POWELL and EUNICE EOUjELL, his wife - for and in consideration of Ten dollars and other valuable ^onsideration conveys and quit claims to ALP D. HF!•1STAD the following describeri real estate, situaic.1 in the County of King State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of the grantor(s) therein: The t•.:ut 300 feet, of ?want: 7 of . Lend =7y's 5 Acre T•_'_cts as par Plat recorded in Volume 6 of Plata on Page 90, records of King County; Subject to: to easement to the grantor and his assigns, for the now existing private water line running across the south 30 feet of the above described property; Said easement is to become null and void whenever a water main is installed on South 151st Street, which borders this property on the south. This instrument is given to replaace warranty deed which has been lost. • .2,.1:.•• •ll . ,, ;, s+. \\.;"44.\•' M. 1. +t r1'il41A',1:, 141:13 COUNT TREASURER r 1 �L Dated this i — —Z 11 A • �II/` % �,�'SrAtji igi,.GTON, tsTAkY 'a OPUS NW LLC 6I4. Quit Claim Deed day of February GIVEN under my hand And official seal this if/ -' day of Notary Public end + • .. .. area swans roe moaners use. t PA3f.._........- RECKSt 147 UT 3 PM 3 35 ROBEF' A. MORRIS AutITt, I'!N�£: ":jNTY *It SH form 4 8- t•ttirv. Revenu.: stamps affixed to warranty deed Excise tax paid 9/15/59 it...-. : ;o. E359636 , 1967 04ft.trriv oily appeared before me William Powell and Eunice l....rnejoto is R, ;l,athe individuals deaerihed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument. and artnian4ugnl.•th t th-ry signed the same as their free and vole.dary act and deed. for th. uses noel purposes therein mention -•t Febru Powell ary . 1967 for the Stem d/ fP hingt m. 7 1 1 I 7 003 �.�r, -.. «.y...�• .....- .?�..nn.�ar.r,M,a .�.x�• t[S'.y'S,nrX;n�t3`K�.3 06/19/01 09:06 FAX 425 453 17?' OPUS NW LLC real estate contract 6368922 william powell eunice powell raymond hayward iola hayward daniel rochon jeanine rochon is hereby acknowledged, and ttr Inducts al Bald parrban pates anal be iu d as foMows: • .. ' . ($ 150.00 • ) . . purchase ps = dull beer twos far raid. Ito purchaser further acme to pay Miura on tbo dlmiebblgg balaaea of said plod ear pals, • whkb interest shall be deducted from acb latatlmna p yment ..d the boluses of each payment. applied in redaction of principal. All gaymrota to br made benuader gall be made at or at such other place as the seller may direct in writing. • • - • • • As referred to la this contract, "data of drain," sbaU be .>rr�at 26 . i a . hem, ite bbecco purchaser on�said real estate; and If before y the to this connttractthe ethat baa assumed payment grantor and ot nI any mortgage, [saytncttgalth . • contract or other encumbrance, or ban assumed payment of or agreed to purchase subject to, any taxes or aunamcnta now • lien on said . real estate, the parcbasf:r agrees to pay the same before delinquency. "(2) The purchaser' 'agrees, until the purchase price Is fully paid, to %Sep the buildings now and hereafter placed on said real estate '•'fnsurtd to the actual ash aloe thereof amt loss or damage by both dm and windstorm in a company acceptable to the seller and for • the sd benefit, as his Interest may appear, and to pay all premiums therefor and to deliver all policies and reatwab thereof• to • the seine. (3) The purchaser agrees that full Inspection of said real estate has been made and that neither the seller nor his assigns shall be held • to any covenant respecting the condition of any Improvements thereon nor shall the purchaser or teller or the assigns of either be held to . • any covenant or agreement for alterations, improvements or repairs unless the covenant or agreement relied on is contained herein or is In writing and attached to and made a part of this contract. (4) The purchaser assumes all hazards of damage to or destruction of any Improvements now on said rein estate or hereafter placed thereon, and of tb: taking of said rest ettste or any tart thereof for public use: and a,.vees that no such dama e. destruction or taking Ault corutitute a failure of eomillrreti..n. In ease ..no: pas „t said real estate is taken for public use, the portion of the condemnation sward .. remaining after payment of seasonable expense..,t lamming the same shill be paid to the seller and applied as payment on the purchase price herein untesa the idler rlrcts to anmv the punh.t•er to npnly all or a portion of such condemnation award to the rebuilding or reators- tleo of any impr- vementa damaged by such taking. In case of damage or destruction from a peril insured against, the proceeds of such heIf.toration nr rebuilding of such O{� On the title n.umnce in full amount of red containing no insurance remaining after payment of the reasonable expense of procuring the same As improvements within a reasonable time, unless purchaser dens that said proceeds s purchase price herein. (5) The seller has delivered, or agree. to deliver within tS days of toe date of closing, ref r9 standard form, or a Commitment tinnier, titled by no.... atone., see .. . ,.K■... , MO... , In t rc a��eer a l are UM prarhase p against a or damage by reason of defect in sellers tow nu'. Utle to tow estate a ofth 0 0R clot etc:pefcns other than the following: a. Printed general caceialu,a appearing in said policy fern; Mt b. Lens or encumbrances which by the terms of this contract the purchaser is to assu a Is to he made subject; and c. Any existing contract or contracts under which seller is purchasing said real nut seller by this contract .pets to pay, none of which for the purpose of this pa� nveyance hereunder 421004 06/19/01 09:09 FAX 425 453 1712 t ._•' Unbar i'dfficeint *shad' • " ""'she rhilili 1 .. i'ATN.T5A 1 . .!: .. J ••'-^:- . : and to retain P03O eta paretaser'fa not St bewdiaThilatehmatemantilis bantiskrbahliap tad other hsproy Mega as uM reel attar SW 'good rags: .and` net. Is pensW:imiik'sridilaatettrius lb.i3 Maui. lama. . p turom Th • eayenaara tow andok halanothater emstroaisteharimAyriatatawareeraeldth!la 4 . • • • • 11114011 saidialOtai afarthstlatO • 00 In GUI the PUIthithler fatii te Soak* assitityseene heriiiipmeidiell orb. tatilahi . barrinadi Imridioirektbe Saar aw • sods cornea or elect rob Wawa* sad say amowids sir Pad bIlably'ecneri torebajdtb letelrase alawctief WA' per =eta :' from date of prone wadi asmaid. essemathatry nallitsfodlaStermy stsr twos hnis by mob a asdi:i • :4i. (10) 71cne is' of the einem ittia. W \ierrinmsi- Weise' thelp•oin•r' sisal fa to cevaiii • id* / 11111 ° 11 . 1 ay Ctadithel Ox asnoorat hereof or to main sox iI tecadrad berivader.peueeptta it the tam sad to meatier bender raoaind. Ise ..:•:•..:.•••••••• •.'. • • .eilkr may elect to declass all an bereandee tondasted,'aad.speer la :debut so. •afi 'pomade made by the purchuar.....- •:" •: blasaackr and Istaroveaseals' epee lb..' estate MAL be. toefdledto .tho' seller es lia ted.dansams. and the Ware • • • • . bare right to memo and mks powesion of the real estate; abrI laleeinte!iy.tbe p C art *M* purchow • swim o n of an g sm a nds. melees or wow ersiorslith Meict to it:dela:Sind tifinbotion CI . Parrharr's hate y hi ' • •••''' • .s by United 1r. WA, postate prwpam Mum receipt espested.'FIletctedie the purchaser at Wa . address tut known to the • • (11) Upon eeDer's election In bring suit torsions say . covenant of this comnsc‘'. indudlort 'sok to' tolled any payment rtquiud • . •• • " • newt:add. tea gardaser mess to pszy a cemossbie ma as attetocest.teotoad all casts. sad eqmoss tzsusectIes with such oh, • • • ..' was. &all he laduded Is any tot or acme osierad Is moth Jadt..•.•.„ . . . • • . • the seller sail bring snit to procum an adjunscuics of the termadow, ' el the pincisiOrri 4f.1e'larieurmicr. joC-7,7a. : entend, the purchaser area to pay a namable sum as alsors iota and costa and expenses Is comedian with such suit, and alto • • the reasonable coot of searching records to detonates Me c�vdltIsn of this at the data such suit is econnosaed• which mame abeil be IN WITNESS WHEREOF. la parths hereto ham escorted Ws adamat es 4td tke date dist written sham • (Sm). • . , SThTE OF WASH:NOM% county of KING . .4.erso O this day Pareacelb' aPpmed before me to toe known to be the indwastaa desofbed in and who CZOICUtOi they signed the same as their therein ratindoned. a _ W *,•" my &ad and offidal seal this r. • : •• •• • • R ' > :I `? ....... • 190 OPUS rw LLC VILLIAM POWELL AND EUNICE FOWELL 00 day of $ECos t P40 e.," 08 de , ad ..... ROB 1 1"VC Cil ., ‘. 71: SAUh. ff4Siy ' 0 4 - Po 5 p .<21.1:4 (use) i ' [. ‘ it .1 t0061.1 the within and feregobg lastrumeet, and adurowkdstd that • het sod voluntary set and deed, for the um and purposes ' ••••••• ..... ..tt ------........ ..... ....... .... oi .. .. N i Poetic .. sod— : ... v W ier tie Scare of . or ."/". --,-< . residing 444Mt j'4 4 ••••••••■••••■•■ ONUS "ilio C6096 NOIDNINSYM 13 Put S uut. EIV wati *0 • litiv 3ttt 'StAuuos UiLltlU9 IS3MHiliON°1' jO sanbau 1 promo In) pap 1 11.11.1.1040.3.t 1114111/M Ilthdtha nutiatuu enia =mem ioatiold a 005 6038426 in hand paid, conveys and warrants to OPUS NW LLC the following described real came. eituated in the County of Washington 603M26 \\ -% Statutory warranty Deed who signs as and is identical to ALLAN horROCKS THE GRANTOR S, ALLEN HORROCKS /and LAURABELLE HORROCKS, his wife; for and in r.:nrideratinn of Tt+:1 POI.L.t is ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALU.AiiLE CONQIDERATI(N :4ILLIAM PO'JELL and EUNICE POWELL, his Wife, l/1 of the Smiths 1/7 of Tract 6 ne Saattte Land Com•any's 5 Acre :rat— as Nor +lit recorded it Volume 6 of Plats, 1a„e 90, records of King •,., ; :(t;::• , !' the . ;t•st 293 feet there +r• AND EXCEPT +ortion conveyed to t;,_ ,; t,� ':shington by deed r:ca ded under Auditor's File No. 5484939 . . 11':'•r ✓ Na. 1. • C b tle�ic4 . a�. i� 'gci.r a1t1� ins rn nt.s, i.z. }, r lit inbi.::1:∎1 faI£ lvu, �i� .. ► .) �i' 111' I1F' l►'AS111N(:1 • • • restrictions and res•rvatians o` record, if stay. /OUM 1.5111 2 day of ; :ay 1966. ✓ "CLCL [J.A�W --S 4 (siai4 , State of _ (sitl.:•dal p '•r {Na.etl.,iteforeme .Man 1!nrrnc•te .r.d La•trabelle Wirt ricks to sae t.nt••n to k�tt+/Mfalil�tJ ,'tiev:ril,ed in and who etecuted the within and foregoing instrument, and 4r: a. eaS`;t��tfahe came as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the Si lov•altilged uv. arid port•rce tiSreliVrrn ; t' i d% F N ihd t'',aial oral this day of Jqre . ' 7fil bile i a . %'ntnry )' 'eliding ar - 2006 -t ••� for the SYote of 1F'altiatton. : , • 06/19/01 09:13 FAX 425 453 171 • OPUS NW LLC 6038425 Statutory Warranty Deed THE GRANTOR, HENRY C. HANSEN, as his se ,,rate eatnta; for and in c uncider ;dion of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION william powell and EUNICE POWELL. hie wife, In hank l,aili.......; .... ... • ,State of the following Ilex rated real raalr..ituatrd in the county of King 1V:ranng1.1n Tito North 1/2 of eh.. :Huth 1/2 or Tract 6 of Seattle Land Com•.rty's 5 Acre Tracts, to -or ■1 tr r••c )1.1c41 in 1/1111.^.,1.' 6 of '1 tts, ,age 90, records of King County; EACEt'T • . • , 'i ; f t :nreaf : AN') CM :En notion cot:v to the Stare of •.Iinhinpton • • t•.•r.t;• on.lur '.udit tr's Filc No, 5500251 f•tr P. Iltoh•Jay N•'. 1. SALES TAX 1_1 ... i f tr ". t.t ../ t•.j�t •t •f•r4 r ions , r••,. l, Ind r4F.• rv,Ci ins at' roe tr.', day of :: ty , 1066 Wir/kkAg.4. .1tat.rl J,u UC. ._ _...___ (stet) I nl lb • .••■ i •, .•■:..1 1'•II< 1:t•l !aloft' me Henry J:. II In•I••c. . to •are l,r`vlt to be the nldlt.111411 I:.x'r1114 in and who ewent rd the within and foregoing Instrument, and � ��l..�.,, ��r . .n4 nrd the .anti as his tier and voluntary set and deed, for the .1i kno4 r `...`.• ••I Y '• .....; •,.r 0 g.'•.: : .�ij�' %N mide1 .+.boot and afi i 'al .ell !bit • r1 .4. • S • .1' 1 • d ay ,d ntnc . 1.166 IAL t, ei4dtC Font are t1Xta.i.) Notary Public • and,fite Ike State a) Wa,hinttulr, • 6.1 n ridint at ■• Ij 007 t' 4953818 KING COUNTY W DEPUTYN. A THE GRANTOR, CLARENCE PIErCE, Administrator of Estate of Peter Anderson, Deoeased, for and ' n'.siaer;.tion of Five Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($5,600.00) - - - - in hand paid, conveys and warrants to WILLIAM POWELL and EUNICE POWELL, his wife, .•ed= the (Minoring described real estate. sitt.ated in the County of Washington: Dated this STATE OF WASHINGTON, Ss. County of KIN siAszomvogiv. he OPUS NW LLC . • �1�. •Ttt Ih� r.1. Ir.,l.l \N u.�i r.'. t Statutory Warranty Deed tt Tract 7, Seattle Land Company /a 5 -acre Tracts, oommonly known as 5150 Southf5lat Street, Seattle, Washington. This deed is executed and delivered pursuant to 'rder of the Probate Court, in King County Superior Court, Cause No. 150153, wherein an order confirming this sale was confirmed. 7 day of pc tobe Form 467- 1 -nEV State of SALES TAX' JElt oc t 14i S 4 , • 4 •yam As trator o CE n a'te of Peter Anderson, deceased. «.... « «.. «.... «. «.......... «.._ (SEAL) On this say persoitallyappeared before me Clarenoe W. Pierce, as Administrator st..nie 1tncer4; t be' the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and signed the same as hie free and voluntary Act and deed, fnr the 4 y41tidrptt .:therein mentioned. . :"' ' t 4. . :.ty hand and official seal this / S day of Or :::+ // ber N ib' : ....r..%...'. 9 • «....._......_._ !_�! :'r;t:'•1 pC ,19 58. 12008 Z Z W 0 co 0 J S t/1 W � u_ Q u H O Z W M U O - O H W 1--- W Z w U O • ~ Z • 'age 1 , Computer : COUNTER 34 Parcel Geo Area : 70 -10 Spec Area : 0 -0 Folio : 20847 Resp : C Block : Property Desc : VACANT LAND Legal Desc : SEATTLE LAND COS 5 ACRE TRS TaxPayer Accounts Land HBU If Vacant : Commercial Service Present Use : Vacant(Commercial) Percent Unused : 0 Zoning Date : 08/29/1996 Sewer System : Private Corner Lot : No Base Land Val : 24,100 Tax Year : 2002 Parking : Land Views Mt Rainier : Olympics : Cascades : Territorial : Seattle : Land Waterfront Location : Bank : Tide /Shore : Restricted : Lot Depth Factor : 0 Land Nuisances /Problems Topography : Traffic Noise : Extreme Airport : 0 Trans. Concurrency : No Land Designations Historic Site : Nbr Bldg : 0 Adj. to Golf Fairway : No Adj. to Greenbelt : No Other : No Deed Restriction : No Account King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0090 Res Area : Q -S -T -R : NW- 23 -23 -4 Type : C Levy : 2414 Lot : 6 Property Address : TUKWILA N 1/2 OF S 1/2 LESS W 283 FT 766160- 0090 -03 I ROCHON DANIEL J & R H HAYWA 5136 S 151ST SEATTLE WA 98188 RD HBU As Improved : (Unknown) Traffic Volume : 0 Current Zoning : 0 Water System : Water District Lot SqFt : 10,042 Restrictive Size /Shape : No Land Val Date : 01/16/2001 Road Access : Restricted Street Surface : Sound : Lake Washington : Lake Sammamish : Lake /River /Creek : Other : Powerlines : No Other : Yes Water Problems : No Other : No Access Rights : No Proximity Influence : No Poor Quality : No Footage : 0 Current Use : (None) Dev. Rights Purchases : No Easements : No Native Growth : No DNR Lease : No LESS ST HWY Change 06/05/2001 cont. on page 2 � , Page 2 � �.. �.. • • ' . King County Department of Assessment Parcel 766160 - 0090 Computer : CO 06/05/7001 Environmental Restrictions ( NoDe) Value History for Acct 766160-0090-03 Tax Omit Appr Appr Appr Appr Land Imps /otal Tax Levy Change Change Yr Yr Land Imps Total Imp Incr Val Val Val Val Reason Status Code Date Number Reason 2001 0 24,100 0 24 0 24.100 0 24.100 T 2414 00302000 Revalue 2008 0 24.100 0 24.100 0 24.100 0 24 T 2414 07/14/1999 Revalue 1999 0 8.000 0 8,000 0 8.000 0 8.000 T 2414 08/05/1998 Revalue 1999 0 8.000 0 8.080 0 8,000 0 8.000 T 2414 07/27/1898 R470730 Revalue 1999 0 8.000 0 8,000 0 8.000 0 8.000 T 2414 04/18/1998 R470000 Extension 1998 0 0 0 0 0 8.000 0 8.000 T 2414 08/26/1997 Revalue 1997 0 0 0 0 0 8,000 0 8.000 T 2414 09/04/1990 Revalue 1995 0 0 0 0 0 8.000 0 8.000 T 2414 06/28/1994 Revalue 1993 0 0 0 0 0 2,700 0 2.700 T 2414 02/19/1992 Revalue 1991 0 0 0 0 0 2.800 0 3.800 T 2414 0108/1990 Revalue 1991 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 2414 12/12/1989 Levy Code Chng 1988 0 0 0 0 0 2.100 0 2.100 T 4615 11/13/1987 Revalue 1987 0 0 0 0 0 2.100 0 2,100 T 4615 03/01/1886 Revalue 1985 0 0 0 0 0 2.300 0 2.300 T 4615 04/13/1884 Revalue 1983 0 0 0 0 0 2.300 0 2,300 T 4615 12/24/1981 Revalue N/d ZI33N3H 32IDV 88'£LT T8 '£TT 99'6ZT 08' i79£ H 917 ELT 00' V d alYd viva 'IVNOISIGGV t'£SV S8" S8" £Ii IW'd aIVd :MG 'TVLOJ T8'£TT 99 "6ZT 08 "79£ Z6 "9I£ 00' a3'I'I I S SdWI £ 'IKJ3'I XMH IS SS3'I I3 £8Z M SS3'I Z/T S 30 Z/T N T0/S0/90 S21 L EUDV S SOD GN'd'I 3'IZIL`d3S 3AI,LDV ZN2111D : LS 3f1T A321 00/OE/80 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. S8' S8' S8" LNV a3TI I S :3000 dWllr 000'8 000'8 00T't'Z 00T'tZ 00T'I7Z aNFPI SI LSK'I WV T7T :ZS:TT :auTJ T00Z /S /9 :aTEa OZT76 OZT76 OZT6 AA3'I £0060009T99L IDdH a33M SIIOIXON 66 a33M SfOIXON 00 cam SIIOIXON TO RdAs 3'IBVAI3DSE 2IV3A TT7Z Z 86 IiTT/Z Z 66 t'TT7Z Z 00 T7Ti7Z Z TO T7TT7Z Z ZO NI -NO 2A3I DN DS IS AO Ali : )D0'Ig 9:10'1 88186 `dM 3'IIIVaS IS1ST S 9£TS a2IVMAVH H 2I 7 3 r 'ITINVG NOHDO21 :DOG £0060009T99L IDd2i 2IOSS3SSK : aumN quatunooa T :abed Page 1 Computer : COUNTER 34 TaxPayer Accounts Land Waterfront Location : Bank: Tide /Shore : Restricted : Lot Depth Factor : 0 Land Nuisances /Problems Topography : Traffic Noise : Airport : 0 Trans. Concurrency : No Land Designations Historic Site : Nbr Bldg : 0 Adj. to Golf Fairway : No Adj. to Greenbelt : No Other : No Deed Restriction : No King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0120 Parcel Geo Area : Res Area : 024 -010 -0 Spec Area : Q -S -T -R : NW- 23 -23 -4 Folio : 20847 Type : R Resp : C Levy : 2414 Block : Lot : 7 Property Address : 5136 S 151ST ST TUKWILA 98188 Legal Desc : SEATTLE LAND COS 5 ACRE TRS LESS W 300 FT LESS ST HWY Account 766160 - 0120 -07 I ROCHON DANIEL J & R H HAYWA Land HBU Vacant : Single Family Present Use : Single Family(Res Use /Zone) Percent Unused : 0 Zoning Date : 08/29/1996 Sewer System : Private Corner Lot : No Base Land Val : 150,000 Tax Year : 2000 Parking : Land Views Mt Rainier : Olympics : Cascades : Territorial : Seattle : 5136 S 151ST SEATTLE WA 98188 RD HBU As Improved : Present Use Traffic Volume : 0 Current Zoning : 0 Water System : Water District Lot SqFt : 53,300 Restrictive Size /Shape : No Land Val Date : 04/13/1999 Road Access : Public Street Surface : Paved Sound : Lake Washington : Lake Sammamish : Lake /River /Creek : Other : Access Rights : No Proximity Influence : No Poor Quality : No Footage : 0 Powerlines : No Other : Yes Water Problems : No Other : No Current Use : (None) Dev. Rights Purchases : No Easements : No Native Growth : No DNR Lease : No Change 06/05/2001 cont. on page 2 Page 2 Computer : COUNTER 34 Environmental Restrictions ( None ) Residential Building 1 Obsolescence : 0 % Completed : 0 Year Renovated : 0 Heat Source : Oil 1st Floor Sq Ft.: 1120 2nd Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Finished Basement Sq Ft. : 0 Unfinished Half Sq Ft. : 0 Total Basement Sq Ft. : 0 Basement Garage Sq Ft. : 0 Stories : 1 Deck Area : 0 Enclosed Porch Sq Ft. : 0 Fireplace Multi Story : 0 Fireplace Additional : 0 3/4 Baths : 0 Bedrooms : 2 Building Grade : 5 Fair Basement Grade : View Utilization : Accessories Misc Imp SgFt : 0 Eff Year : 0 Value : 3200 Description : Residential Building 2 Obsolescence : 0 % Completed : 0 Year Renovated : 0 Heat Source : Electricity 1st Floor Sq Ft. : 760 2nd Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Finished Basement Sq Ft. : 0 Unfinished Half Sq Ft. : 0 Total Basement Sq Ft. : 0 Basement Garage Sq Ft. : 0 Stories : 1 Deck Area : 0 Enclosed Porch Sq Ft. : 0 Fireplace Multi Story : 0 Fireplace Additional : 0 3/4 Baths : 0 Bedrooms : 0 Building Grade : 5 Fair Basement Grade : View Utilization : King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0120 % Net Condition : 0 Year Built : 1960 Additional Costs : 0 Heat System : Floor -Wall Half Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Upper Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Total Living Sq Ft. : 1120 Unfinished Full Sq Ft. : 0 Attached Garage Sq Ft. : 0 Brick/Stone : 0 Number of Living Units : 1 Open Porch Sq Ft. : 0 Fireplace Single Story : 0 Fireplace Free Standing : 0 Full Baths : 1 1/2 Baths : 0 Building Condition : Good Building Grade Var : 0 Daylight Basement : Address : 5136 S 151ST ST 98188 Grade : % Net Condition : 0 Date Valued : 01/01/1900 % Net Condition : 0 Year Built : 1926 Additional Costs : 0 Heat System : Radiant Half Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Upper Floor Sq Ft. : 0 Total Living Sq Ft. : 760 Unfinished Full Sq Ft. : 0 Attached Garage Sq Ft. : 0 Brick/Stone : 0 Number of Living Units : 1 Open Porch Sq Ft. : 0 Fireplace Single Story : 0 Fireplace Free Standing : 0 Full Baths : 0 1/2 Baths : 0 Building Condition : Good Building Grade Var : 0 Daylight Basement : Address : 5136 1/2 S 151ST ST 98188 06/05/2001 cont. on page 3 Page 3 2002 2001 2000 1999 1999 1999 1998 1997 1995 1993 1991 1991 1990 1989 1987 1985 1983 168,00 160,00 150,00 43,00 43,00 43,00 2,00 2,00 2,00 66,00 66,00 66,00 170,00 162,00 152,00 109,00 109,00 109,00 King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0120 Computer : COUNTER 34 06/05/2001 Accessories ( None ) Value History for Acct 766160- 0120 -07 Tax Omit Appr Appr Appr Appr Land Imps Total Tax Levy Change Change Yr r Land Imps Total Imp Incr Val Val Val Val Reason Status Code Date Number Reason 168,000 2,000 170,000 T 2414 05/02/2001 Revalue 160,000 2,000 162,000 T 2414 04/19/2000 Revalue 150,000 2,000 152,000 T 2414 09/01/1999 Revalue 43,000 66,000 109,000 T 2414 08/05/1998 Revalue 43,000 66,000 109,000 T 2414 07/27/1998 R470730 Revalue 43,000 66,000 109,000 T 2414 04/18/1998 R470000 Extension 43,000 66,000 109,000 T 2414 08/26/1997 Revalue 43,000 57,000 100,000 T 2414 09/04/1996 Revalue 43,000 57,000 100,000 T 2414 06/28/1994 Revalue 54,600 34,200 88,800 T 2414 02/19/1992 Revalue 35,100 37,600 72,700 T 2414 01/09/1990 Revalue 0 0 0 T 2414 12/12/1989 Levy Code Chng 26,100 31,900 58,000 T 4615 09/15/1989 Maintenance 26,100 28,800 54,900 T 4615 11/13/1987 Revalue 25,900 31,400 57,300 T 4615 03/01/1986 Revalue 28,800 28,700 57,500 T 4615 04/13/1984 Revalue 28,800 33,000 61,800 T 4615 12/24/1981 Revalue N/d VILVI rIVNOIIIGGV tESV IIaaNas a1Dv St EL'OSS'T Z9 "99L'T T8'008'Z H 66'S9T'T 00" V d aIVd t6" fi6" Lt' INV GIVd : ana rlydsOs EL'OSS'I 000'99 Z9'99L'T 18 "OOE'Z L6 "TEE'Z 00" (=TITS t6" t6' IWV =ITS AMH LS SSarI la OOE M SSa'I T0/S0/90 S2is a2IDV S SOD GNrdr[ =Limas aAIZD�' .L anD :ZS aL1rivAa2i 10 /Z0 /S0 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR - THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. : aGOD dWD2 000' Et 000'99 000'Er 000'Z 000'0ST 000'Z 000'09T 000'Z 000'891 SdWI GN'd'I Z SI 'IV` = ZSYI WV 6S: ZS: TT : uJTJ 1002/S/9 :aqua OZT76 OZii6 OZii6 AAarI LOOZ1009199L IDd2i aaaN SfOIXON 66 aaaM S110IXON 00 aaaM S110IXON TO adds arrEVAIaDa2i 2i`dE2 t1tZ Z 86 tTi7Z Z 66 tItZ Z 00 tItZ Z TO titZ Z Z0 ArI - WO XAanI DN DS IS AO Ali :XDOrIS L :ZO'I 88186 VM a'II.Zrd'3S ISTST S 9ETS =MAW' H 2i L' 'IaINVG NOHDO2i :DOG LOOZ1009199L IDd2i liOSSaSSK :amEN :am quaiunooa T : abed • Page 1 Computer : COUNTER 34 TaxPayer Accounts Parcel Geo Area : 70 -10 Spec Area : 0 -0 Folio : 20847 Resp : C Block : Property Desc : VACANT LAND Legal Desc : SEATTLE LAND COS 5 ACRE TRS Account 766160- 0094 -09 f ROCHON DANIEL J & R H HAYWA Land HBU If Vacant : Commercial Service Present Use : Vacant(Commercial) Percent Unused : 0 Zoning Date : 08/29/1996 Sewer System : Private Corner Lot : No Base Land Val : 27,000 Tax Year : 2002 Parking : Land Views Mt Rainier : Olympics : Cascades : Territorial : Seattle : Land Waterfront Location : Bank : Tide /Shore : Restricted : Lot Depth Factor : 0 Land Nuisances /Problems Topography : Traffic Noise : Extreme Airport : 0 Trans. Concurrency : No Land Designations Historic Site : Nbr Bldg : 0 Adj. to Golf Fairway : No Adj. to Greenbelt : No Other : No Deed Restriction : No King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0094 Res Area : Q -S -T -R : NW- 23 -23 -4 Type : C Levy : 2414 Lot : 6 Property Address : TUKWILA S 1/2 OF S 1/2 LESS W 283 FT LESS ST HWY 5136 S 151ST SEATTLE WA 98188 RD HBU As Improved : (Unknown) Traffic Volume : 0 Current Zoning : 0 Water System : Water District Lot SqFt : 11,112 Restrictive Size /Shape : No Land Val Date : 01/16/2001 Road Access : Restricted Street Surface : Sound : Lake Washington : Lake Sammamish : Lake /River /Creek : Other : Powerlines : No Other : Yes Water Problems : No Other : No Access Rights : No Proximity Influence : No Poor Quality : No Footage : 0 Current Use : (None) Dev. Rights Purchases : No Easements : No Native Growth : No DNR Lease : No Change 06/05/2001 cont. on page 2 Page 2 Computer : COUNTER 34 2001 2000 1999 1999 1999 1998 1997 1995 1993 1991 1991 1989 1987 1985 1983 0 27,000 0 27,000 O 10,000 O 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 27,000 0 27,000 0 27,000 0 27,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 0 0 0 10,000 O 0 0 2,700 O 0 0 2,800 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 2,100 0 0 0 2,100 0 0 0 2,300 0 0 0 2,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 27,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 2,700 2,800 0 2,100 2,100 2,300 2,300 King County Department of Assessments Parcel 766160 - 0094 Environmental Restrictions ( None ) Value History for Acct 766160- 0094 -09 Tax Omit Appr Appr Appr Appr Land Imps Total Tax Levy Change Yr Yr Land Imps Total Imp Incr Val Val Val Val Reason Status Code Date T 2414 08/30/2000 T 2414 07/14/1999 T 2414 08/05/1998 T 2414 07/27/1998 T 2414 04/18/1998 T 2414 08/26/1997 T 2414 09/04/1996 T 2414 06/28/1994 T 2414 02/19/1992 T 2414 01/09/1990 T 2414 12/12/1989 T 4615 11/13/1987 T 4615 03/01/1986 T 4615 04/13/1984 T 4615 12/24/1981 Change Number R470730 R470000 06/05/2001 Reason Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue Extension Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue Levy Code Chng Revalue Revalue Revalue Revalue N/d LI33N3S E DV SL' fii6T LZ'ZtT LO'Z9T OL'80t H ££' ii6T 00' V d GIVd VINCI TWNOILIGGV ii£SV S8' S8' INV QIVd = 3f1Q 'I`d,I,OI LZ' ZtT LO'Z9T OL' 80fii 99'88£ 00' Car I I H SdWI NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. S8' 58' 58' INV CaTIIE :3000 dWLlr 000'0T 000'0T 000'LZ 000'LZ 000'LZ QNVTI £ SI ' IF O= ZSITI AMH IS SS3'I Z3 £8Z M SS3'I Z/T S 30 Z/T S TO /50/90 SILL SUDV S SOD QLWI 3'I LILVES 3AIZDV ZN nD=ZS 3n'IvA32i oo /o£ /80 NV 3£ =ZS =TT :aiuzs TOOZ /5/9 :eqPG OZ76 OZ'6 0Zt6 AAErI :XDOrla 60Ii60009199L IDd2i Q33M SIIOIXON 66 Q33M S11oIXON 00 Q33M SnOIXON TO 3dAL 3rIEVAISD32I 2iVaX titZ Z 86 T7TiiZ Z 66 tItZ Z 00 tItZ Z TO tItZ I ZO A'I - NO AA3'I DN DS IS AO Ali 9 :IO'I 88T86 VM =LIVES ISIST S 9£TS OE IYMAVH H 2i 9 l' 'I3INFZU NOHDO2i :DOG 60t60009T99L IDd21 2IOSSHSSV : aureN quauin3oa T : ab2d May 11, 2001 Lisa S Verner PO Box 70372 Seattle WA 98107 Re: Opus project at 51 Ave South and South 151 Street. Dear Ms. Verner: Please let me know if you need any additional information. You can reach me 206- 431 -3685. Sincerely, Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner Cizj' of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The City's consultant had reviewed the wetland report submitted by you for the above referenced property. The peer review report was sent to you last week. You had requested a map showing location of data plots along with data sheets for the areas sampled as part of Adolfson's review. Attached is a map showing the location of areas sampled along with field notes recorded by Adolfson Associates. The location of data plots as shown on the map are approximate locations and are intended just to provide you with some guidance of the areas that need to be reviewed by your wetland biologist. Since Adolfson Associates were not actually delineating the wetland but verifying a wetland report, they did not create data sheets for every point sampled but all plot information was evaluated for wetland parameters. Also, I will give you a call regarding scheduling an onsite meeting, after confirming the time with Adolfson Associates. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 z a• J oo N D CD LU J CD LL, W O g- � = z F. 1- O Z ~ w U O Y-e- O F- W W . I 0 z w I . O I z OPUS. THE OPUS GROUP A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O R S D E V E L O P E R S May 10, 2001 Mr. Steve Lancaster Director of Planning City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Steve, Sincer Opu orthwe y Ta Senior R cc: Properties at 50" Avenue South and South 151' Street in Tukwila state Manager or Steven Mullet, City of Tukwila e Duffle, City of Tukwila Council Minnie Dhaliwal, City of Tukwila% Don Marcy, Caimcross & Hempelmann A J Bredberg, B &A, Inc. Jeanine RochonfRaymond and Iona Hayward W. Steve Oaksmith Dwayne and Ruth Hayes Robert McElrea 4 Transmitted via FAX 5/10/01 Bart Brynestad Senior Real Estate Director Pam Carter, City of Tukwila Council Richard Simpson, City of Tukwila Council Gary Schultz City of Tukwila Lisa Verner, Commercial Development Solutions Michael George, Colliers International Nettie Cunningham Johann and Hildegard Pollinger Richard and Virginia Jo Botham Sheila Bums OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. 915 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 -453 -4100 Fax 425 -453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com Opus Northwest, L.L.C. wants to assist the City of Tukwila and several property owners at the referenced location to solve a drainage problem before it escalates into a major issue. We believe a mutually acceptable solution can be achieved under the current ordinances. Discussion at the Utilities Committee meeting last night underscored the fact that you hold a technically correct Wetland Delineation Report prepared by B &A, Inc. dated Febniary 15, 2001, and a conflicting, inadequate, and erred Peer Review by Adolfson dated April 25, 2001. B &A, Inc. spent many days on the subject properties and adjacent properties studying the soils, plants, interviewing the owners, and researching the history. B &A, Inc.'s report clearly documents the site's conditions — that the ditches are ditches, not regulated streams, and the wetlands, as delineated, are in full compliance with local, state, and federal sensitive area regulations. Not only is Adolfson's report teclulically inaccurate, the Adolfson team spent little time on site, provided no data sheets of test holes or maps locating their investigation, and incorrectly identified the drainage system. Opus Northwest is not seeking to change the City's ordinances, but rather we seek to work within them, as it appears the ordinances contain language that will enable the City to reach a compromise with the landowners. We would like to meet with you to craft a solution that will be acceptable to all parties. We will contact you to set a time for a meeting. Also, should any council member desire a briefing or a tour of the site we will be happy to accommodate those requests. \ COAa tCIALIC Takwil•\DAt IV • S9 wctl Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort ry auderdale • Houston .d • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. City of Tukwila Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Chair Pam Carter Joe Duffie Time: 5:00 p.m. N . ITEM NO. ACTION TO BE TAKEN I. Current Agenda Review II. Presentation(s) III. Business Agenda A. Opus Development - Page 1 B. Duwamish Area Right -of -Way Improvements - Page 5 C. 2001 Small Drainage Projects Phase I Bid Award - Page 9 D. Cascade View Drainage and Ground- water Plan Open House - Page 15 E. Urban Center Upgrade, Project Completion and Acceptance - Page 19 IV. Old Business Attachments III. A. Information Memo w /attachment B. Information Memo w /attachments C. Information Memo w /attachments D. Information Memo w /attachments E. Information Memo w /attachment AGENDA Tuesday, May 8, 2001 Place: Conference Room No. 5 II. A. Discussion. B. Discussion. C. Move to Regular Council with recommendation to approve and authorize Mayor to execute contract. D. Information. E. Move to Regular Council with recommendation to accept contract and release retainage. Next Meeting: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 Future Agendas: 1. The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Please contact the Public Works Department at 433 -0179 for assistance. Minnie Dh aliwal BACKGROUND City of Tukwila Department of Community Development MEMORANDUM TO: Utilities Committee FROM: Steve Lancaster, Director Community Development RE: Briefing on Opus project and wetland/stream issues. DATE: May 1, 2001 Attachment III.A. On March 20, 2001, staff briefed you on wetland/stream issues associated with the Opus proposal for the area located at the northwest corner of South 151 Street and 51 Avenue South. At that time the applicant's wetland report was being peer reviewed by the City's wetland consultant and Gary Schultz, Urban Environmentalist. The review is now complete and this memo provides you some key conclusions of their review. A pre - application meeting was held in December, with representatives from Opus Northwest LLC regarding their proposal to develop an 11.5 -acre site (eleven different parcels) located at South 151 Street and 51 Avenue South. The preliminary proposal was to construct two speculative buildings (65,000 square feet and 32,000 square feet) for office /warehouse /manufacturing uses. In 1999, the City had held a similar preapplication for development of this site with another developer (Trammel Crow Company). On January 23, 2001, Opus NW submitted a land altering permit for clearing brush using hand tools in order to do some survey work. On February 6, 2001, City sent the applicant a letter requesting additional information in order to process the land- altering permit. Specifically, the applicant was asked to clarify the discrepancies between the wetland survey submitted by the applicant and the previous wetland survey that was submitted by Trammel Crow in 1999. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director However some clearing and land altering was done prior to issuance of land altering permit and prior to resolving wetland boundary issues. As a result the City's Code Enforcement Officer sent correction notice letters to all property owners and to Opus NW, asking to discontinue all activity until a permit is obtained. On February 20, 2001, the applicant submitted a wetland report for the subject site. The City's wetland consultant, Adolfson and Associates reviewed the applicant's wetland report. They also had an on -site meeting with the applicant's wetland consultant and a representative of the property owners. twr?cnrrw -t.,. i .,. s M.r,. r. H.. .�o '! "tY2�;?39 y tr.5;tx.�,. c ru •u4ge�- 4xwnn§•rihc°x�LfC . h .F., .. I 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 KEY CONCLUSIONS OF ADOLFSON'S PEER REVIEW REPORT • The wetland boundaries need to be revised and made larger. The applicant's report identified wetland A (Type 3) in the northeastern portion of the site; wetland B (Type 2) in the central- z eastern portion of the site; and wetland C (Type 3) in the southern portion of the site. (See 11- attached map) Adolfson agreed with the boundaries for wetland C. But they recommend W substantial revisions to boundaries of wetland A and B. Also, additional areas of the subject D site must be delineated as wetlands (slopes northwest of Wetland A and southwest portion of o p the site). If the wetland area in southwest portion of the site is hydrologically connected to Wetland B either directly or via south watercourse, wetland B will be substantially larger co = than currently delineated. cn w 0 • Aerial photographs of the site from 1936 to present show maintained ditches on the site and in the low -lying areas in the vicinity of the site. A 1936 photograph shows a north -south Li. a u) ditch along eastern portion of the site and several west to east ditches that conveyed water = from the higher western portion of the site to the north -south ditch. Z mill 1— 0 • There are three regulated watercourses that cross the site in east west direction and are rated W F • w Type 3, which require a 15 foot -wide buffer. The watercourse that runs north -south along I -5 is rated as Type 2 watercourse, which requires 35 foot -wide buffer. v O— o I— • Applicant's wetland report needs to be revised to clarify the methodology used to delineate = 0 wetlands. It also needs to be revised for internal consistency. Further detailed descriptions of �; the wetlands and watercourses must be provided. — ui z Uu) • State and Federal regulations that may pertain to this site include SEPA, Hydraulic Project p Approval and Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act. Any filling of a jurisdictional z wetland requires approval from Army Corps of Engineers. • There are some statements in the peer review report that refer to surface water issues, which must be explained. The following section by the City's Public Works Surface Water Division addresses the surface water issues. SURFACE WATER ISSUES • Area Drainage and History The site is situated in a low -lying area that has historically received surface water runoff and ground water from higher elevations to the west. The site continues to receive ground water and surface water from the west by the three watercourses that channel the runoff through the site to the I -5 ditch. These three watercourses enter the site via three cross culverts conveying surface flows beneath 51 Ave S. A review of the topography of the area shows that the three cross culverts were placed in locations that correspond with the natural drainages of the area. 51 Ave S was initially constructed prior to 1920. This date is based on the age of the older homes in the area (1906,1907,1911,1915) and the fact that the 51 Ave S Bridge was reconstructed in 1950. The original roadway configuration had a ditch running along the west side that directed surface flows to the three cross culverts. This configuration was z changed in 1991 when the ditch was enclosed using culverts and a series of catchbasins to = ~ allow for a pedestrian path. The three cross culverts were not changed nor were any flow rx paths of the area's runoff altered as a result of this work. 6 J 0 00 In 1964 and 1965, I -5 was constructed and a large amount of fill material placed immediately u) 0 east of the site. During the course of construction, a new ditch was constructed to convey flows from the subject site and highway drainage in the area. This ditch is within the I -5 N right -of -way and is situated lower in elevation than the site. w o • Water Sources u Water transported to the site comes from two sources, surface and ground water flows = a m Ui originating above 51 Ave S. Both these sources are the result of the topography of the area and soil conditions within the site. This situation has changed little since the area was first 0 developed. The primary changes over the years are an increase in the amount of impervious z LLI surfaces and the construction of various conveyance systems in the area. The general effects w of additional impervious surfaces are that they result in increases in peak flows and decreases o N in the amount of water that infiltrates and becomes ground water. All the storm systems o 1— within the basin that have been constructed appear to simply convey runoff downstream and = - 0 none of the systems appear to be transporting runoff to this area that has not historically flowed this direction. o w z UN To determine if septic tank runoff from the property west of 51 Ave was contributing to the o surface flows to the site, Public Works collected a water sample from each of the three z tributaries. An independent testing laboratory analyzed these samples for the presence of bacteria and reported that each of the samples tested positive for total coliform and negative for E. Coli. The lab technician reported that these results indicated warm - blooded animals, i.e. human septic systems or wildlife, did not contaminate the water. The positive result for coliform is the result of the natural decaying process of plant material and is consistent with surface water runoff. Since septic tanks do exist above the site and septic tanks discharge effluent, some of the surface and ground water transported to the site must be a result of these septic systems, but the test result indicates that this amount is negligible. • Effects of I -5 The construction of I -5 in 1964 and 1965 had a major affect on the hydrology of the area downstream of the site. Watercourses were changed and a substantial amount of impervious surfaces were added to the sub -basin. These changes have had a detrimental affect on areas downstream of the site. However, the site is upstream of the I -5 right -of -way and, therefore, surface flows have had little to no effect. One possible effect of the construction of I -5 is with the placement of a substantial amount of fill immediately adjacent to the site. This fill may have affected ground water in the area resulting in an increase in the water table within the site. 3 3 •fa SUMMARY C: Mayor Steve Mullet Council Members 4 There are regulated wetlands and watercourses on the subject site. Any site development proposal must take into consideration all areas delineated as regulated wetlands and watercourses. Opus needs to revise their wetland report to address the issues raised by Adolfson and Associates. Additional wetland areas in the north and southwest portion of the site must be delineated if they remain as part of the project proposal. Pursuant to Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Ordinance, on site mitigation opportunities exist only where Type 3 wetlands are impacted. Type 1 and Type 2 wetlands are not permitted to be filled unless the filling is required for facilities as listed in Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) 18.45.080 A and B (e.g. essential streets and utilities) or subject to meeting reasonable use exception (TMC 18.45.080 H). If the southwest portion of the site is additional wetland area and is connected to Wetland B, it will not be considered Type 3 wetland. Any proposal to fill a wetland will also require federal permits. City of Tukwila Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Chair Pam Carter Joe Duffle Time: 5:00 p.m. Place: Conference Room No. 5 Attachment III.A. Opus Development AGENDA Tuesday, May 8, 2001 6 U O CO D W = J � fQ u, . w 0 g Q co _ w zF.. rO Z w CI H L O ..z w O z Please add the attached e-mail from Richard and Virginia Botham to this agenda item. Minnie Dhaliwal ' Lucy 1auterbach - an exampn private ' ' is deve opment From: "Botham, Ric" <Richard.Botham©PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'lauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <Lauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 4/27/01 2:02PM Subject: an example of private /public development Dear Ms. Lauterbach, Please forward this letter to the members of the Tukwila Utilities Committee for their next meeting. My spouse and I are unable to attend, but would appreciate the committee considering our proposal. Would you also please forward a copy to Mayor Steven Mullet. Thank you. To: City of Tukwila - Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Committee Chair Joe Duffle - Pam Carter Date: Friday, April 27, 2001 Subject: An example of an Economic /Ecological Partnerships Dear City of Tukwila Utilities Committee Members, In a previous letter I proposed the City Of Tukwila actively consider a policy which would promote responsible private /public partnerships concerning the development of privately held property within the city boundaries. I would like to submit this area as an another example of such a working solution. The land lies directly to the east of Lind Avenue, south of the railroad tracks just south of SW 34th, and directly north of SW 39th. It adjoins the Home Base and Cinema complexes, which lie to the east of the land in I'm referring to. The ready for development property I am referring to has a series of holding ponds and natural growth on the east side of the parcel. These settling and holding ponds have been constructed to allow surface drainage in an orderly and beneficial manner, while permitting a reasonable use the property. Another such area could be the vacant properties to the west of 1 -5 between 144th and 151st. These would also suffer from man made drainage problems, as the land behind Home Base could have. But a sensible solution was reached allowing for ecological and economical benefits. What I am proposing is for the Utilities Committee and Tukwila City Council to direct their Planning and Development departments to work with developers who are ready to resolve these problems in meaningful and beneficial ways, and at these developer's expense. Most of these county, state and federal created problems, which Tukwila inherited and has been trying to remedy, can be resolved. For example: using this ecological / economic partnership, a developer might construct a series of narrow looping 'rice' patty -like holding ponds along the 1 -5 corridor to allow water to filter and seep into the ground as was the normal situation prior to 1 -5 and county road constructions. Then similar gravel bedded flow or Page __ vim.. -....' .,:.. Lucy Lauterbach - an examp e o pnva'-r-oublic eve opment underground culverts would feed road water into these ponds at intervals designed to alleviate pooling and stagnant water / mosquito problems. These water management areas would be scenically and ecologically bordered with appropriate plants to further enhance t! he natural process, which has been distributed by man made problems. And large areas could be re- claimed to provide productive benefits to the community. Thus, two area of concern would be solved for mutual benefit to the City of Tukwila and it's citizens. The first being a much better surface water management within the confines of these ' designated areas. The second would be a more productive use of the land within Tukwila while increasing revenues to fund better city services and provide employment opportunities. 8 I am respectfully petitioning the Utilities Committee to move expeditiously to pass along such a w = policy to the entire Tukwila City Council with an Approve and Implement Recommendation. -J F- U) w Thank you for your consideration. w O g Q . �c Sincerely, = CJ Virginia and Richard Botham z H property owners since 1975 at 14702 - 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98168 and surrounding w O acreage. ? o U 16334 Linden Ave. N. Shoreline, WA 98133 o - - - w 206- 542 -7793 U u_ . botham @serv.net u . Z O ~ z Ric Botham email: Ric.Botham @Boeing.com phone: 253 - 657 - 8096 CC: "'Ginger' < botham @serv.net> �9e Lucy ‘erbach - an examp a of private /► hlic development NC" From: "Botham, Ric" <Richard.Botham @PSS.Boeing.com> To:. " 'llauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <lauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 4/27/01 2:02PM Subject: an example of private /public development Dear Ms. Lauterbach, Please forward this letter to the members of the Tukwila Utilities Committee for their next meeting. My spouse and I are unable to attend, but would appreciate the committee considering our proposal. Would you also please forward a copy to Mayor Steven Mullet. Thank you. • To: City of Tukwila - Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Committee Chair Joe Duffle Pam Carter Date: Friday, April 27, 2001 w w Subject: An example of an Economic /Ecological Partnerships 0 O w W 2 U. O .. z In a previous letter I proposed the City Of Tukwila actively consider a policy which would promote U responsible private /public partnerships concerning the development of privately held property within the o city boundaries. z Dear City of Tukwila Utilities Committee Members, I would like to submit this area as an another example of such a working solution. The land lies directly to the east of Lind Avenue, south of the railroad tracks just south of SW 34th, and directly north of SW 39th. It adjoins the Home Base and Cinema complexes, which lie to the east of the land in I'm referring to. The ready for development property I am referring to has a series of holding ponds and natural growth on the east side of the parcel. These settling and holding ponds have been constructed to allow surface drainage in an orderly and beneficial manner, while permitting a reasonable use the property. / Another such area could be the vacant properties to the west of 1 -5 between 144th and 151st. These would also suffer from man made drainage problems, as the land behind Home Base could have. But a sensible solution was reached allowing for ecological and economical benefits. What I am proposing is for the Utilities Committee and Tukwila City Council to direct their Planning and Development departments to work with developers who are ready to resolve these problems in meaningful and beneficial ways, and at these developer's expense. Most of these county, state and federal created problems, which Tukwila inherited and has been trying to remedy, can be resolved. For example: using this ecological / economic partnership, a developer might construct a series of narrow looping 'rice' patty-like holding ponds along the 1 -5 corridor to allow water to filter and seep into the ground as was the normal situation prior to 1 -5 and county road constructions. Then similar gravel bedded flow or Page 1€ ij�fyl"� ' ?y �+�a'3 "`w: .,. +... - .�+a.a+....... .y.r. ».•. —•�-'. .'f� °, ,Y/"Q.-.1v'�F�k '."' �.':''�141j 3 \' H.n'wb w• tS fi. z w 6 --I C.) co o co J w co = w I- _ z � � z �- assAimaki 01.1s pfMtift Luuly 11/ uterbach - an example of private!' Ric Botham email: Ric.Botham @Boeing.com phone: 253 - 657 - 8096 is evelopment CC: "'Ginger "' <botham @serv.net> • underground culverts would feed road water into these ponds at intervals designed to alleviate pooling and stagnant water / mosquito problems. These water management areas would be scenically and ecologically bordered with appropriate plants to further enhance t! he natural process, which has been distributed by man made problems. And large areas could be re- claimed to provide productive benefits to the community. Thus, two area of concern would be solved for mutual benefit to the City of Tukwila and it's citizens. The first being a much better surface water mana within the confines of these designated areas. The second would be a more productive use of the land within Tukwila while increasing revenues to fund better city services and provide employment opportunities. ! am respectfully petitioning the Utilities Committee to move expeditiously to pass along such a policy to the entire Tukwila City Council with an Approve and Implement Recommendation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Virginia and Richard Botham property owners since 1975 at 14702 - 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98168 and surrounding acreage. 16334 Linden Ave. N. Shoreline, WA 98133 206- 542 -7793 botham @serv.net Page 2 z H 00 J F- ° Y' a = w I- _ Z1.- F- O Z F- w . U ( O � w W U w z U = O ~ Z 1. EXECUTED at CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan a AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: ss I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, t m to ees, ngi cers contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at / ! D — �5 �''t � Ttti !-C l Z G( Lax • 9 g r e for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The•City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. 7. Non - responsiveness to a City information request for ninety (90) or more days, shall be cause to cancel the application(s) without refund of fees. (city), (state), on ©k a- k u k Po L L ! f'l ri (Print Name) P , Q . gox 7 1? V teaf e v ieco, a . 9g (Address) 360 _ c a 7 ,� l� 6/ Q (Phone Nu (Sig 6404, P8-(-6/4-og'("if On this day personally appeared before me - 7641 t1 t■N f ol-Ur$ Qt=�2 to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS 3d DAY OF c oZC3O NOTARY PUBLIQor the State of Washington residing at \rL■v.c ‘ Co•JN^-t My Commission expires on .. \ .lY.P Ob - Dear Ms. Lauterbach, Thank you. Lucy Lauterbach - Letter to Tukwila's t, as Committee for March 20th meeting con aration From: "Botham, Ric " <Richard.Botham @PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'Iauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <Iauterbach @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/20/01 10:52AM Subject: Letter to Tukwila's Utilities Committee for March 20th meeting consideration Please forward this letter to the members of the Tukwila Utilities Committee for tonight's [March 20, 2001] meeting. My spouse and 1 are unable to attend, but would appreciate the committee considering our proposal. To: City of Tukwila - Utilities Committee Richard Simpson, Committee Chair Joe Duffle Pam Carter Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 Subject: Proposed Economic /Ecological Partnerships Dear City of Tukwila Utilities Committee Members, I would like to propose the City Of Tukwila's Utilities Committee approve and pass to the Tukwila City Council a recommendation for adoption of a forward thinking policy to remedy land use problems created by other agencies before the City of Tukwila annexed these parcels. This policy will address Surface Water Issues throughout the city. These problems were inherited by the city, having been created before the long term problems of surface water management were as understood as they are today. Given the limited resources available, a viable and solution oriented approach would seem to be the most successful avenue available. An excellent example of just such a policy is in place on the construction site located on SW 16th Str, just east of the Boeing headquarters site along side I -405's south side. Here a parcel was suffering from inadequate water management planning and 1-405 construction done before Tukwila annexed the area. Now water retention ponds built to current standards exist to control surface water and protect our streams. And all done in partnership with a conscientious developer at their expense. Another example: when 1 -5 was constructed through farms, orchard and pasture land in the valley accessed then by McAdam road and South 144th, proper drainage was not developed, or subsequently maintained, along with the freeway. None of the prior uses could have existed under the runoff situation the freeway's design and construction created. Then King County compounded this runoff situation with inadequate ditches and converts along 51st Avenue South. Now it is left to City of Tukwila to resolve someone else's poor planning and inadequate maintenance. What I am proposing is for the Utilities Committee and Tukwila City Council to direct their Planning and Development departments to work with developers who are ready to resolve these problems in meaningful and beneficial ways, and at these developer's expense. Most of these county, state and federal created problems, which Tukwila inherited and has been trying to remedy, can be resolved. For example: using this ecological / economic partnership, a developer might construct a series of narrow SR; ti:: wL. ti41i `�lCiti�'�ss�,�' ^. 'Yi i+ Page 1 Lucy Lauterbach - Letter to Tukwila's L as Committee for March 20th meeting core r :oration looping 'rice' patty-like holding ponds along the 1 -5 corridor to allow water to filter and seep into the ground as was the normal situation prior to 1 -5 and county road constructions. Then similar gravel bedded flow or underground culverts would feed road water into these ponds at intervals designed to alleviate pooling and stagnant water / mosquito problems. These water management areas would be scenically and ecologically bordered with appropriate plants to further enhance tl he natural process, which has been distributed by man made problems. And large areas could be re- claimed to provide productive benefits to the community. Thus, two area of concern would be solved for mutual benefit to the City of Tukwila and it's citizens. The first being a much better surface water management within the confines of these designated areas. The second would be a more productive use of the land within Tukwila while increasing revenues to fund better city services and provide employment opportunities. I am respectfully petitioning the Utilities Committee to move expeditiously to pass along such a policy to the entire Tukwila City Council with an Approve and Implement Recommendation. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Virginia and Richard Botham property owners since 1975 at 14702 - 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98168 and surrounding acreage. 16334 Linden Ave. N. Shoreline, WA 98133 206 - 542 -7793 botham @serv.net Ric Botham email: Ric.Botham @Boeing. corn phone: 253 - 657 - 8096 CC: 'Ginger "' <botham @serv.net >, "'dfhayes1 @home.com"' <dfhayesl @home.corn> Page 2 :1� : k ct a&. >' : •',Si��+Ss• b..�:7<.u:Fx"aY , s:? 4::%. ?? 174,61t^`,t,'10.ict.': TO: FROM: RE: DATE: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM Utilities Committee Jack Pace, Planning Manager ' Briefing on Opus project and etland /stream issues. March 20, 2001 On December 21, 2000, a preapplication meeting was held with representatives from Opus Northwest LLC regarding proposal to develop 11.5 acre site located at South 151 Street and 51 Ave South. The proposal is to construct two speculative buildings (65,000 square feet and 32,000 square feet) for office /warehouse /manufacturing uses. In 1999,the City had held a similar preapplication for development of this site with another developer (Trammel Crow Company). The subject site is comprised of eleven different parcels that are currently owned by eight different property owners. Opus NW has an option to buy some of these parcels. The subject site is bounded by I -5 on east side, 51 Ave South on west side and South 151 Street on the south side. Portions of the subject site are mapped as environmentally sensitive areas (wetland and watercourse) on the city's sensitive areas map. On January 23, 2001, Opus NW submitted a land altering permit for clearing brush using hand tools in order to do some survey work. On February 6, 2001, City sent the applicant a letter requesting additional information in order to process the land- altering permit. Specifically, the applicant was asked to clarify the discrepancies between the wetland survey submitted by the applicant and the previous wetland survey that was submitted by Trammel Crow in 1999. However some clearing and land altering was done prior to issuance of this permit and prior to resolving wetland boundary issues. As a result the City's code enforcement officer sent correction notice letters to all property owners and to Opus NW, asking to discontinue all activity until a permit is obtained. The city has met with representative of the property owners and is in the process of determining an appropriate course of corrective action. On February 20, 2001, applicant submitted a complete wetland report for the subject site. The City's consultant, Adolfson and Associates is reviewing the report. On March 13, 2001, they met with Opus NW's consultant and real estate agent representing the property owners. Some of the issues discussed at the meeting centered on impacts to the subject site as a result of construction of Interstate 5 and 51 Ave South. Adolfson and Associates are doing some follow up work this week and we hope to get their review comments by next week. In summary, the City's final decision will be issued after a full review of the applicant's wetland report by the City's wetland consultant. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 W ,,__ akx ". fi F5� ». �+ s swtttt�ra*r � rsaY Y sr v �zrai,r a nsrt se 6 �fexrxCS,t rK: >: Ica ku R t xa , sa t icsit w Kt' -v NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Utilities Committee March 20, 2001 Present: Richard Simpson, Chair; Pam Carter, Joe Duffie Jim Morrow, Pat Brodin, Tom Pulford, Ryan Larson, Jack Pace, Mayor Mullet, Lucy Lauterbach; citizens RH and Iola Hayward, Jeanine and Dan Rochon, Dwayne Hayes, realtor Michael George - Colliers 1. Development Issues 51 Ave. /151 Street Staff had a large aerial of the area north of 151 Street between I -5 and 51 Ave. Jack Pace said DCD is now having peer review done on the wetlands. A wetland consultant one year ago had delineated a much larger wetland than the recent wetland consultant had shown, and so a third biologist will work out why there was a difference between the two studies. Jim said the analysis of the site is just beginning, and there are no specifics known yet. However, the site appears to have wet ground as well as wetlands. The city's consultant may be able to verify what is there and how much is wetland or other. Dan Rochon said Opus was the fourth developer property owners have lost. Opus had originally planned two large buildings covering much of the 12 acres, but pulled back when the wetlands were found. Dan claimed the wetlands are caused by city pipes that drain the hill above 51 Ave. Jim M said he welcomed the information and would consider it in the city's information gathering process. Dan said the water was fine until I -5 was put in and the state didn't clean their drain pipes. He and Janine declaimed the damage the city has done to them. Jack Pace said DCD is responding to the developer's project that was presented. The City will be guided by state and federal rules for wetlands. Dwayne Hays gave a presentation, starting with a description of the area of 12 acres owned by 8 property owners, and worth $3 million. He said Opus wanted a larger development but was stymied by the wetland. He knows that Tukwila Ecology doesn't care how a wetland was made, but his (Dwayne's) position was that the area wasn't a wetland until the city and state made it one. He thought the wetland issue could be resolved. There is some standing water, mud and blackberries, but nothing that's not able to be resolved quickly and with little cost. Dwayne recited some history of the area. There was once a stream below these properties. The land slopes north to south and west to east. When I -5 was built in the mid -60's, it covered a stream, and diverted it to the east in a drainage ditch which also caught I -5 runoff. The Hansen family had a floral business and small orchard on what is now the wetland, and grew great numbers of flowers and fruits. Dwayne's wife's son also grew a garden there, and none of that could have grown on a wetland. Dwayne also pointed to the blackberries on the site, saying that blackberries don't grow onto wetlands: they can survive if a wetland comes onto them, but they don't expand into wetlands. He said the state has not maintained their drainage ditch. The Rochons have pressured the state to clean it, but they don't anymore, and the city hasn't helped with the state. Surface water that was discharged from the hill on the west side of 51 Ave. was once put into a ditch, but that ditch was covered when the City put in a ped path. Now there are three pipes that Tot (07 Utilities Committee March 20, 2001 discharge water east of 51 Ave. Janine said there did not used to be so much water coming off the hill. She pointed to all the new homes that have been built there, displacing natural storm water drainage. Their water now drains to this property east of 51 Dwight suggested this water could be piped down to the ditch. Dwight noted the City's interest in Sound Transit running west of I -5 instead of on 99. Sound Transit planned to culvert the water and fill the site and that was o.k with the city. Opus wanted the whole site but since only two pieces were developable that will leave 5 separate parcels instead of one large piece. Some properties would have 80% wetland, and one has 100% wetland. These properties can be damaged by the state and city , and then the city says you can't develop because it's wet. Private property rights have been infringed upon, he said, and it was the government agencies of the city and state which caused the wetland. Dwayne believes that the city could solve the problem by working with the developer to channel the water around the property and into a ditch. Because government caused the problem, he wants government's help in doing something to work out the problem so Opus can develop according to their original plan. The Rochons said they have been paying surface water fees for year, and then they find the city's been pouring water on them for years. Jack P. reiterated the city will follow state and federal regulations. Pam asked what the state's responsibility is for cleaning the ditch. Dwayne said there's a difference between a natural wetland and a government- caused wetland. Joe supported the claim that it was not wetland thirty years ago. He said he used to play around with friends there. He said we need cooperation between all the parties now. Pam asked if there are streams on the hill above 51 Ave. Jim M said there were; there was one in a ravine he pointed out on the aerial photo. He said S. 144 is the dividing line between two watersheds. Dan said on S 147 you can see water running down the hill. Jeanine said there are all septic systems on the hill above 51 so that runoff is also coming downhill. Richard asked if there's ever been a case like this, and was told there had not been, as far as anyone knew. Joe asked if there were a time crunch on this, and Dwayne said there was, since Opus is trying to finalize its plans, and if the problem were resolved Opus could return to their original plan. Jim said they would work expeditiously. Dwayne said the issue is not a surface water problem, but a city policy of what to do when property owners are being damaged by the city and state. Steve M said the quickest way to go is to solve the water problem rather than try to change city policy which can takes many months. Richard noted things have changed, with much more stringent regulations now where people used to be able to build over a stream. Pam complemented staff on the maps they are able to generate in- house. Information. t•,N r1iC* .mc9a^} `$ " :'iy'`r �+t K'L�.'M#k3" • A. Utilities Committee March 20, 2001 2. Foster Golf Course Project Completion Staff introduced the issue of the completion of work on the golf course greens 14 and 17 and tees 11 and 17. The committee asked about the change order, and were told it was a case of a large piece of machinery damaging a path, so some asphalt and other work was done according to how the city wanted it, with the city and contractor splitting the cost. Tom said the contractor, Maple Fore, was very good to work with. Joe asked how long the project was good for, and was told the work was guaranteed for a year. Steve M asked how the budget came out, and was told the project was well within budget. Recommend to consent agenda of a Regular Meeting. 3. Consultant Agreement for Cascade View Drainage Jim started, saying the City has been doing projects in Cascade View piecemeal. Ryan L said staff looked at the area and decided the whole area needed to be looked at as one piece. Some work has resulted in eliminating roof drains that once went to sewers. In places on the hill, water runs down alleys. A study is needed to look at the whole area, and pinpoint what projects are needed to resolve problems there. Jim said the city short listed three firms, and KPG stood head and shoulders above the other two. Because they know the community, they know Tukwila standards, and they score best on the ratings. Pam said she supported the study, and Richard agreed. Ryan said the $85,000 project will include some preliminary engineering, which will save money down the road. Steve asked if some sidewalks were on the right of way, and staff didn't know but thought they were. Recommend to Regular Meeting. 4. Puget Sound Energy Conversion Jim said Puget Sound Energy (PSE) had filed a petition with WUTC to have cities pay for their lines in streets. After city pressure was put on them, they withdrew the petition, but could submit it again once attention is withdrawn from this arena. Federal Way plans to ask a representative whether PSE plans to negotiate in good faith or use a back alley to WUTC in the future. Information. 5. Metro Sewer Rates Jim has heard Metro plans to double its hookup charges. He thought residents who can but haven't hooked up in Allentown should know this in time to hook up before the price hike. Information. Committee chair approval z i-z 6 00 0 wF. C1) w o LQ = • o u t- o Z uj U CI o 5 O I-- w W � . u'o .. w U -- F-=. o � z c,) March 20, 2001 The subject of our discussion is a wetlands issue affecting development of property located along 51s Ave. S. in Tukwila. A block of approx. 12 acres, currently zoned "Office ", has been on the market, offered by eight owners. The combined value is approx. $ 3 million. My wife and I own one acre of this property, located at 14940 51 Ave. S. A developer has been attempting to acquire the whole site, and planned to build a couple of large office buildings. They have been blocked by a wetlands issue. The position taken by Tukwila Ecology is that the only thing that matters is that a major portion of the land is wetland; and that it does not matter if the land was not wetland at a previous time, nor does it matter how it became wetland. Our position is that it does not matter if some of the land is presently wetland. What matters is that the land was not wetland, and it is most important how it became wet. The point being that it was the action and inaction of the City of Tukwila and the State of Washington that caused the land to become wet by the discharge of water onto private property and by blocking the natural drainage of water from the property. This problem can be equably resolved in short order and at little cost. To make our case, we are going to begin by doing a bit of time travel. We are going to go back more than 50 years. At this time, we do not see the I5 freeway. There is a stream, running mostly north to south, below these properties. The stream is not there now, the freeway was built on top of it. But, back to the land, there are several acres in cultivation by the owners, Hansen's Florists. They are raising flowers, for sale in their business. They also have a small orchard here with apple, peach, plum, and pear trees. Specifically, pansies were grown on the eastern ( lowest) edge of what is now our property. Obviously, such cultivation was NOT being done in wetland. Now, let's move forward to the mid 1950's. My wife bought the property in 1953. In these years, she made preserves and pies from the fruit of the trees and her son planted a large garden where the pansies used to grow. He raised beans, corn, peas, squash, pumpkins, and other vegetables. You can't do that in wetland. In the mid 1960's, the freeway is built. Along the west side of the freeway right -of -way a drainage ditch is installed to carry away the natural drainage of the hillside. That drainage having been blocked by the fill for the freeway road bed. The ditch also receives water from the freeway. It is a drainage ditch, not a class three stream. Freeway water continues to be discharged into that ditch at the present time. This could not be done in a stream. Because the freeway is not a desirable residential neighbor, some of the property owners move away. Blackberry vines move in and prosper, really prosper. Now, blackberries do not invade wetland. They can survive if the land becomes wet, and they have here; but they do not take over wetland. Moving forward again in time, we find that the State does not live up to its obligation to maintain the drainage ditch. It is allowed to silt up and be blocked by weeds. This causes water to back up onto private property. One of the property owners, the Rochons', have repeatedly pressured the State to maintain the ditch but have seldom succeeded. King County and later, after annexation, Tukwila have not supported the property owners by forcing the State to live z a z a: 0 00 N0 w w J w 2 uQ co o F_ z = zo w w O • — o wW u: 0 w z — • I O O 1- z up to its obligation regarding the drainage ditch and the diversion of water onto private property. The freeway ditch is only one component of the problem. Surface water from 51 Ave. S., which forms the western border of the property, drains onto the property, There is no curb, no ditch, no storm sewer along the east edge of the street. On the west side of 51 there was a drainage ditch that collected surface water and water coming from the hillside which rises to w the west of 51 That ditch has been paved over to make a sort of pedestrian walk. The water 6 from the hillside enters tile in what was the ditch, and three pipes have been run under 5151 _10 Ave. S. which discharge that water onto the private property we are discussing. It is evident u) W from the map of proposed wetland that these pipes did not discharge into natural watercourses; w because the wet pattern shows the rapid spreading of this water across the slope, even though much of the slope is fairly steep. When this discharge of water onto private land was brought w o up as an issue, one comment we received was that water from the hillside to the west has always entered the land. This conveniently ignores the fact that in the past the water moving u east from the ditch was distributed along the side of a ditch about 6 blocks long. The pipes = cr under the street focus that flow. The drainage is thus not natural but man made. Z i-- 0 I would like to mention that the City has permitted an increase in the flow of water in the w hillside by approving a housing development farther west in which the surface water from the o property and street is directed into large dry wells. That water is added to the flow onto this o cn property. o w w U But, back to the water being discharged onto private property, not only should the water not be u there; but, when the water emerges from the pipes under the street , it becomes "holy water ", ui z according to Ecology. It can not be piped elsewhere and nothing can approach within 50 feet U of such "holy water ". When this "holy water" reaches the freeway drainage ditch, it quite all o 1-- right to mix it with freeway water and run it through a culvert just off the corner of the property Z in question. The culvert action, there, was permitted because an office building owner wanted to increase the number of parking spaces. This was done by running the freeway drainage ditch into a culvert which was then paved over. Going into the realm of what might be, for a moment, I will mention that Tukwila would very much like to have the proposed Light Rail Transit route relocated from Highway 99 to the west side of I5. When the Light Rail planners and engineers presented the plan for relocating along I5, I was told that the expansion to the road bed, which was required, would involve placing the freeway drainage ditch in culvert and filling over it. This is the same stretch of freeway ditch that we have been discussing. I question that Tukwila will be willing to jeopardize the desired routing by refusing permission for such treatment of the ditch by claiming that it is a class three stream. I, of course, cannot speak for OPUS, the developer; but they have put a good deal of money and effort into the attempt to develop this property, and I am sure that they would be willing to cooperate in conveying the water across the property and into the freeway ditch, and in restoring that ditch to properly perform its function. We sorely need timely attention to this issue. OPUS desired to acquire the 12 acre parcel, zoned office, which is offered for sale by eight owners; but they have been forced by the impasse over the wetlands issue to shelve the large project, and may proceed with acquisition of only two parcels. If this happens, this valuable large site will be broken into five parcels with significant loss of property value. With the land currently valued at over $250,000 per acre, the economic impact on the owners from losing this sale will be severe. The current position of Tukwila ecology regarding this issue, would reduce the value of some of the parcels by as much as 80 %, and in one case by 100 %. While $250,000 may be chicken feed to the State and the City, it is a very major item to individual owners who have planned on their investment in this property to fund their retirement. Several of these owners have lived on the land and owned it for decades. We will not be able to ignore this financial impact. If our property value can be damaged by government agencies, who then use the damage to deny the right to develop the property, it is tantamount to a condemnation without payment. In summation, this is NOT a wetlands issue. This is NOT about allowing development of wetlands, nor is it about determining the size of wetlands. The issue here is that private property rights have been infringed upon by the discharge of water onto private property and by failing to maintain drainage which caused water to back up onto property which was not wetland. The agency causing the water to accumulate on the property was NOT nature but human. In fact, the water problem was caused by the City of Tukwila and the state of Washington, who are supposed to be concerned about protecting the property rights of their citizens. We request that the \ city work cooperatively with the developer to reach a solution to conveying the infringing water; around, or across, and away from the property and that the land be allowed to be developed in its entirety, which it would have been, had it not been infringed upon by human agencies which were beyond the control of the property owners. Statement of Dwayne F. Hayes and Ruth I. Hayes who own property at 14940 51 Ave. S. in Tukwila which property is part of the land discussed above. z w Ce 6 JU O 0 coO LIJ J = w ° g Q = • a � z 1— 0 z r- w w O co O — O I— wW H U w z - • I O ~ z �• ! IM A v.....__ I�r MN =��� �__\ March 19, 2001 Minnie Dhaliwal City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Opus Park 5/405 Proposed Site at 51 Avenue South Dear Minnie, Enclosed is a letter from AJ Bredberg of B &A, Inc., the wetland consultants for Opus. He asked me to forward it to you. Please forward a copy on to Adolfson and Associates. This letter is regarding our recent site visit and some changes in the locations of flags and test holes. Please let me know as soon as Adolfson and Associates completes its site review. I would appreciate seeing a draft report or hearing from them directly if there are any concerns or changes in the wetlands delineation proposed by B &A, Inc. I would like to work out any issues prior to a final report being issued. Thanks. Sincerely, Lisa Verner Principal C: Andy Taber, OPUS Northwest AJ Bredberg, B &A, Inc. Commercial Development Solutions Consultants to the Real Estate Industry t .JP4 4 ,( 4 ) 1 . 7. Post Office Box 70372 • Seattle, Washington 98107 Tukwila/CityL206I 6.8575 • Mobile 206.601.4951 ■ lisa @cdspermits.com • Fax 206.286.8426 3'vit't...4tl.._.:[tere?srk+?�: sly,' �+: d�*( ti'" o-zt{..,`, e,%'• �. �:' �.;`;{: s. rtn" t?iviw ;iti+::tn'6�.'.:id�.'�1:�`�a. RE: SITE VISIT, MARCH 13, 2001 Dear Lisa: f 3303 43rd St. NW, P.O.Box 1337, Gig Harbor WA 98335 USA 253.858.7055 Fax 253.858.2534 ba@a harbornet.com z w 2 . -J C.) U 0 , March 14, 2001 (0 o Lu J = I . - ( . 0 w 0 Lisa Verner Commercial Development Services P.O. Box 70372 = Seattle, WA 98107 Z �o zr w OPUS TUKWILA SITE n o I ww F- Please forward this letter to the City of Tukwila and Adolfson and Associates. o We appreciate the opportunity to have met them on -site and feel it was a C productive site visit. Per on -site discussions, we would like to make note that the o following items are taken into account for review. Z At two locations, we pointed out some flags need to be relocated. Flag B16 needs to be moved out to the south and west, and Flags B6 and B7 can be moved in. A more detailed review may indicate other flags that also need to be moved in or out a few feet. The site was flagged mid -fall 2000 when no hydrology was evident. We anticipated spending more time on -site with the Adolfson staff and adjusting the flags, rather than changing the maps from the originally submitted surveyed map. Some of the test hole locations were not survey located. These are noted in the report as handwritten figures showing the test holes. It is easy to differentiate between the survey located and the approximate located test holes as the survey located test holes are printed in AutoCad format. The northeast portion of the property, immediately north of Wetland A, is a difficult area to interpret. As we showed on -site, water is running along the surface, but the area is nearly a 100% stand of Himalayan blackberry and the soils are nonhydric. We showed the source of the water coming off the street and hope this was clear in the field. With regard to the ditches, it was apparent the ditches do not have a continuous channel to the 1 -5 ditch. We elaborated on the origin of the ditches in the glacial meltwater channel and addressed the highly permeable soils along the head of the fan, the lack of any geomorphic evidence of a historic stream channel, and the lack of adequate hydrology to support natural stream flow. The ditches we see and the running water are supported by storm water, a result of the upslope development. There is no technical basis supporting the presence of a natural stream in the areas we observed. We believe this information is addressed in the report and we merely point it out here. We thank the City of Tukwila and Adolfson staff for their time and effort and hope to have their draft report shortly. If there are additional questions, please have them call or we would be happy to meet on -site to further clarify any technical issues. Si cerel A. . Bredberg CPSS cc: Andy Tabor i � " aj ".:.Y.tiia ;•,+�_ :Gkcs� .s .�. ^`�'r ;.J�. r .. n. . . .................... :ea ?it "t,.' a 'v2.i� » i_ r.. �!: �. C: u• Y�. Vr! f%`^ ir, 'f.:tk�tal.H.s,�:,�sAa�a,�+S:i 3378L3/ajb/smh/3/14/01 2 1 Gary Schu - proposed land use From: "Gotham, Ric" <Ric.Botham @PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us "' <tukcounc @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 3/13/01 10:16AM Subject: proposed land use policy To: Tukwila City Council 1-- z Joan Hernandez, Council President o: Joe Duffle 6 David Fenton UO Pamela Linder to a Jim Haggerton w w Pam Carter _J }— Richard Simpson u- w0 Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 Subject: Proposed Economic /Ecological Partnerships t� d = w z � Dear City of Tukwila Council Members, O z I would like to propose the City Of Tukwila adopted a forward thinking policy to remedy land use g uj problems created by other agencies before the City of Tukwila annexed these parcels. U o O- An excellent example of just such a policy is in place on the construction site located on o 1— SW 16th Str. Here a parcel was suffering from inadequate water management planning and 1 -405 w w construction done before Tukwila annexed the area. Now water retention ponds built to current ►— ;77 standards exist to control surface water and protect our streams. And all done in partnership with a conscientious developer at their expense. w U= Another example: when 1 -5 was constructed through farms, orchard and pasture land in the valley ~ O '— accessed then by McAdam road and South 144th, proper drainage was not developed, or subsequently z maintained, along with the freeway. None of the prior uses could have existed under the runoff situation the freeway's design and construction created. Then King County compounded this runoff situation with inadequate ditches and converts along 51st Avenue South. Now it is left to City of Tukwila to resolve someone else's poor planning and inadequate maintenance. What 1 am proposing is for the Tukwila City Council to direct their Planning and Development departments to work with developers who are ready to resolve these problems in meaningful and beneficial ways, and at these developer's expense. Most of these county, state and federal created problems, which Tukwila inherited and has been trying to remedy, can be resolved. For example: using this ecological / economic partnership, a developer would construct a series of narrow looping 'rice' patty -like holding ponds along the 1 -5 corridor to allow water to filter and seep into the ground as was the normal situation prior to 1 -5 and county road constructions. Then similar gravel bedded flow or underground culverts would feed road water into these ponds at intervals designed to alleviate pooling and stagnant water / mosquito problems. These water management areas would be scenically and ecologically bordered with appropriate plants to further enhance the natural process, whic! h has been distributed by man made problems. And large areas could be re- claimed to provide productive benefits to the community. Thus, two area of concern would be solved for mutual benefit to the City of Tukwila and it's citizens. The first being a much better surface water management within the confines of these designated areas. The second would be a more productive use of the land within Tukwila while increasing revenues to fund better city services and provide employment opportunities. • Ira Schulz - ro osed land use olic Page 2 rY P P P Y • . • I am asking the Tukwila City Council to move expeditiously to implement such a policy. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Virginia and Richard Botham property owners since 1975 at 14702 - 51st Avenue South, Tukwila, WA 98168 and surrounding acreage. 16334 Linden Ave. N. Shoreline, WA 98133 206 -542 -7793 botham @serv.net • h JU 00 . co o ILI_ I- cO W O � d W Z I-O Z Ow W W . H - u_ - O Z W 0 = , O ~ z Sam, d lMiw,YM Office Reams Member � w"•+`�••• March 7, 2001 Mr. Jason W. Jones City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: RFA 01 -058 Dear Mr. Jones: RECEINI ED 1AR 1 2 200'\ CITY OF TUKW MAYOR'S F CE Your Correction Notice sent out under the above - referenced file was received by the property owners. This letter is to inform you that all land altering /grading activity has stopped on the property. No further land alteration/grading will occur until a permit has been issued by the City of Tukwila. If you require any further action on the part of the property owners, please contact me at 206 - 223 -1268 and Lisa Verner at 206 - 286 -8575. Sincerely, Michael George Associate Vice President Cc: Ric and Virginia Botham Sheila Burns Nettie Cunningham Dwayne and Ruth Hayes Robert McElrea Steve Oaksmith Johann and Hilde Pollinger Dan and Jeanine Rochon CMN Inc. An Independent Member of Colliers International Commercial Real Estate Offices throughout the Americas, Europe, Middle East.Asia Pacific and Africa "tiroJLti .Ai�i!'tL��G_, r tL��L�n}.d "'.:",�2!�. ^T^:'. :r:E•Sxle2;`,:.°� 601 Union Street, Suite 5300 Seattle,Washington 98101 -4045 Telephone: 206.223.0866 Facsimile: 206.223.1427 www.colliers.com City of Tukwila Date of Notice: March 2, 2001 Location of Violation: 14940 51st Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98168 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 CORRECTION NOTICE =YT Steven M Mullet, Mayor Date of Inspection: February 15, 2001 (RFA 01 -058) An inspection of the above revealed the following violation of the Tukwila Municipal Code: DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATION: Illegal land altering/clearing/grading without required permit. (TMC 16.54.060, 16.54.200, • and 16:54.210) CORRECTIVE ACTION: Discontinue any further land altering /grading activity until required permit is obtained. Our records (King County Assessor's records) identify you as the person responsible for this property. As such, you must take the above described corrective action by March 16, 2001 or a Notice of Civil Violation will be issued and you will be assessed monetary penalties of up to 5100 for each of the first five days that a violation exists and up to 5500 for each subsequent day the violation continues, pursuant to the Tukwila Municipal Code Chapter 8.45 "Civil Violations, Enforcement and Abatement." If you have any questions, please contact the Code Enforcement Office during my office hours of 7:00 -10:00 a.m. and 1:30 -3:30 p.m at 206 -431 -3682. Your cooperation will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ason W. Jones Code Enforcement Officer Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 AIWA • ii i . 111 ∎......� i ig' l*1 :: IMO 111 11, February 20, 2001 Commercial Development Solutions Consultants to the Real hstate Industry R Minnie Dhaliwal, Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development- Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Wetland Report for Opus Park 5/405 Dear Minnie, Enclosed with this letter is the new wetland report by BA, Inc., the wetland consultant for OPUS Northwest. OPUS Northwest is the project proponent for the Opus Park 5/405 office development at 51 Avenue S and S 151 Street in Tukwila. On behalf of OPUS, I would like to schedule a meeting between AJ Bredberg of BA, Inc and the City's wetland consultant, Adolfson Associates. The purpose of the meeting will be to reach agreement on the final wetland delineation. The wetland boundaries shown in the attached wetland report are based on Mr. Bredberg's review of the site and we would like to make sure the City concurs with his analysis before OPUS proceeds with further site development plans. Please let me know as soon as possible when the meeting can be scheduled. Also, please contact me at 206 - 286 -8575 or by email at lis_a@scispermits.com if you have questions or need additional information. Thank you. Sincerely, tip tki Lisa Verner Principal C: Andy Taber, OPUS Northwest AJ Bredberg, BA, Inc. Don Marcy, Cairncross & Hempelmann Post Office Box 70372 • Seattle, Washington 98107 Tukwila /Wet1ajamL M o bile 206.601.4951 • lisa @cdspermits.com • Fax 206.286.8426 February 9, 2001 Mr. Jack Pace Planning Manager CITY OF TUKWILA 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila WA 98188 Re: Land at 51st Ave South and South 151st Street Dear Jack: I am writing this letter to you on behalf of the owners of the properties currently being considered for purchase by OPUS Northwest. I represent all eight owners of the properties as their real estate agent. The owners are extremely concerned about their ability to sell their land. They also have concerns regarding people, including the city or their consultants, entering their property. Therefore, we are hereby requesting that the city notify me when they or their consultants plan to be on site so I can arrange for the property owners to be present. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Michael George / g Associate Vice President 5.,o „ , Irelsanial =�a CMN Inc. An Independent Member of Colliers International Member , - - Commercial Real Estate Offices throughout the Americas, Europe, Middle East,Asla Pacific and Africa COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 601 Union Street, Suite 5300 Seattle, Washington 98101 -4045 Telephone: 206.223.0866 Facsimile: 206.223.1427 www.colliers.com RECEIVED FEB 12 2001 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ;.:u:szr W: +�lS4�iu.'Kr:w'a�P]:�LfLY s:.;iL*t3::�k6x�'.t�ei rrf,r .�.�.:se�Hyxmus tY1 r. ,r lvr..ewaie OPUS. THE OPUS J;. r '',,P A R C H I T E C T S C O N T R A C T O R S 1) 11 V It L O P E It S February 4, 20011 Dear Minnie: . ,t - }'t \./ j 4 'A i RECE ED FEB 0 6 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ms. Minnie Dhaliwal Associate Planner City of Tukwila )1' . 'L.. : Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 t €tr ., ; : 1 fe\ Tukwila, WA 98188 (;' Re: Easements for Opus Park 1 -5/405 project — File Nos. L01 -050 and E01 -018 OPUS NORTHWEST, I..L.C. 9i5 118th Avenue Southeast, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 Phone 425 - 453 -4100 Fax 425 - 453 -1712 www.opuscorp.com ., . - •t r 1 r r / . ) L ' , r 1 � I Last Friday, 2/1/02, Rick Botham and I met to review an idea for the easements to his properties. We would appreciate your thoughts such as: Would the proposed slight design modification be acceptable and what would be the next steps to accomplish it? This is not a formal request for a modification, just an investigation. If it is possible we could go to the next steps. Summary: The . plan as proposed slopes the fill on our property away from the property line. When Botham's parcel to the east of our north property is developed with fill to about the same elevation a small notch ranging in depth from about 2 -feet to 8- feet deep would be created at the property line. A solution would be for Botham to grant Opus a slope easement and permit us to place fill beyond our property line. Thus, at the time the Bothams elected to place fill on their site they could fill against our slope and eliminate the notch. Also, at the north edge we would provide a transition to Bothom's property. This is identified on the attached site plan. Details: The attached site plan indicates Cross Section s A and B. These cross sections are on the second sheet. The property line remains unchanged for both cross sections. The change is that at Section A the landscaping would straddle the property line, and at Section B all of the five -foot wide landscape area would be on the Botham's property. P:'REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Cot respondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal Easement 020204 .doc Allentown • Atlanta • Austin • Chicago • Columbus • Dallas • Denver • Fort Lauderdale • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Miami • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia • Phoenix • Portland • Sacramento • San Francisco • San Jose • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. City of Tukwila February 4, 2001 The idea is that along the north/south property line of our north parcel, the curb would be at the property line, thus providing a full 25 -foot useable easement width. Needs: If this concept is feasible we would need to agree that Opus's landscape requirement for the north/south property line could be placed on Botham's property with and easement, and that one -half of the landscape requirement on our east /west property line could be on Botham's property. I have tried to be brief and let the attached sketches convey the idea. Please call with any questions or to discuss this idea. Sincerely, Opus I rthwest, L.L.C. Andy Tab Sr. Real Manager Enclosure ite plan, Cross Section sheet. cc: Bart Brynestad Bill Bieber Rick Botham P:\REDEV\TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \Correspondence \City Tukwila \Minnie Dhaliwal Easement 020204 .doc Pg 2/2 z � re uJ 6 JU UO . 111 • = J N L . w ga to a F- 111 F I— 0 Z I—' 111 Lu: U 0 O 1- 2 V . — O: Z . w • CO OH z d P,re A p�ic�t►tiri Fple ly :- :`PREo 056 !,\`r.l l�} .' �y� �v ° }` M ?`'sl it �tx t e4�: � � .. .�'. 7 'iS t i ;i lYIeet ilteimo'ti'fine, December 21 :2000, -.2 30 pin; . i t ' <4,,• 1.1 ta. tt :jf t ?,'•)�'�',:��' <f�, :..1 • ':r�.� t I'f/Yt• i . t F ti lvtlY Q i t t c.�t•k.,t:`Y.a�l i J '....11. -0'.': 0 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: 3. d 4 4. E' 5. 6. El 7. 8. 9. 10. Er Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation 0 Binding Site Improvement Plan El Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit 3' Design Review 0 Design Review - Interurban Environmental (SEPA) 0 Planned Mixed Use Development 0 Planned Residential Development CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development Building Division - Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206)431 -3670 Pre Application Checklist a &) `Ai- -) 7. Zoning designation: 0 Site located in ()learnt'. (UUt,0 ',�'vrN ei Vito -- w,0..1,4Qz — .4 9)to•tu Minimum setback' r equi i n nts: % sue. Front: 2 Side: k - Side: 10 Checklist prepared by (staff): (Gf4) 0 - ‘ 41 `4/' 7\' '�VYM �.� tn. -j- w aruiv> 0 7sW v N n.oce- pAtil c: \mydocs \generat\DItC\dre- checkl ist.doc cklua 1 l N S �rR,�vts r LL \'Al . l.a,Lve g tr- }! : S: SL Ca S :i:•.3, h f. :J0 1.. p t �• rojecf;Nnme; OPUSiPARK 5/405 PLANNING DIVISION - Land Use Information Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) Date: _ r et.-OS 50 ?✓ / c.f woc,ciu -v-tf tuawL& 14re.1.• vat__ /2 't.an„/`a. --t-f iyAk/ aeeL 91- -st'L - 1 ' - .. U ycn -c t cWJ c t -.rte o2 (-L L' re..tWialy% c`✓}. . }v r � U c 3 us\- -- 5 AD aatza,,. •� 1 tc,�.�c. tte Address�'S11AV S }& S 151 ST' " • f'; ,'�, ?� • ...; . -' •ra S.t, t. ,! ..na v A .� j: ?r ..,,.L1, 7',L t .. s. ",5 The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. O Rezone O Shoreline Management Permit El''' Tree Permit O Short Subdivision Sign(s) O Subdivision O Unclassified Use Variance x. * Other: . R.eu.isvw: u6Ct. O U sensitive area? Yes 0 No Fp t,dlt-t Rear: to Maximum Building Height: -1 , 3 h/on u✓ Height exception area? 0 Yes Vil No 3t-' Minimum parking stalls required: 3 1 Iwo ril Handicap stalls required: r u ` -tr,-,./ 0/r46—. No more than 30% of required parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overhangs into compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hitting the curb will be required. Minimum landscaping required: Front: 15 Side: Side: 6 Rear: 1 7 LL / U � tl; L(�yi�pv l/` 47th— taelwAzA 'h'.' (�vv V e2. 17 k i o r !t CAN S• l CZ <- L1W1tt Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 11. Trash enclosures and storage areas must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 12. Building permit plans that deviate from those already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. }" t Y9Y 5,•y J .• r Iti r!1`. - F. • ". E'.1'a:r, ,{"' ^ +i ::.5.*.i r �.e+es.M.e+eee� My ..w , ;een`r �j?�!y.: "'fC h!r ..'- .�',..wL ?' ' 7. , d:S kli�...P:'.". vY...t:: =:f ..a.,v . f..... . , ...._ . _ ... _....... - z � w 00 6 CD w J H 0 u _ d w Z = ZI- LIJ ❑ O • N ❑I-- ww I L O w z O ~ z BUILD! OR • IT .PRIZED AGENT: ' Signature: Phone: (zo 6 , � ,¢2� 2 7S Date: (0/7A Fax #: (z ) $1g�3 -,87c Print na e�j ) I c� 1 i(`i•si/ ci l Address: � I ciao 4 A V6 5(A 2 c: 5 . 4 =' City /State/Zip: s.6q-N le , R y s/b .et ALL MISCELLANEOUS PI. APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMIT ITH THE FOLLOWING: > ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN • BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED > ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT D STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CIVIL/SITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER (P.E.) 9/9/99 udscpn".doc Current copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". BuildingOwner /Authorized Agent If the applicant is other il. an'the owner, registered ` architect /engineer,. or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter frorri;the owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required. as, part• of.this ' . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. SUBMIT APPLICATION AND REQUIRED CHECKLISTS FOR ,Above Ground Tanks /Water Tanks - Supported directly upon grade •, ;exceeding 5,000 gallons and'a ratio of height to diameter or width which'.' ,exceeds'2:1 PERMIT REVIEW . Submit 'checklist No: M -9;,• ' ' ' ' ' n !Antennas /Satellite.Dishes • .Submit checklist : No: M -1 n Bulkhead /Dock i . a: i )'i Submit checklist No tv-10' Commercial Reroof• . ": Submit checklist:„ .i No: .M -6 in ;Demolition , ;Submlt !No•:;M -3• • :Fences Over:.6 feet, in: Height :, •. :, :Submitichecklist,,' No: -j'; M -9 i'! + '`i'' ❑ 'Land Altering/Grading/Preloads Submit checklist!; . No: •,M -2 :•' "' 0 Miscellaneous Public Works Permits 'Submit checklist;• No;.H -9..' ❑ Manufactured Housing (RED INSIGNIA ONLY), • ; ;: Submit : checklistw::i!No :i,.M�5' :� il Moving Oversized Load/Hauling g � "' r }•:' ' :Sufi it chec klistij i; No; i''Iv1 =5: „: '' . • r• i 1 1 Parking Lots, ` ,11 . 1, -r . r.;. , ,:� . ! 11 i :Submit checkl.ist',:•::,No:,,'M -4 Retaining Walls -, Over 4 feet in height. :,Submit;chocklisti No fvt;;�: ❑ Temporary Facilities }: ', • ;'No: 'M:7' +'.'. i• r'.. I '� ' r 0-- ' :Tree!Cutting i' '. �; Submit che ; ;. No:; M-2''' ALL MISCELLANEOUS PI. APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMIT ITH THE FOLLOWING: > ALL DRAWINGS SHALL BE AT A LEGIBLE SCALE AND NEATLY DRAWN • BUILDING SITE PLANS AND UTILITY PLANS ARE TO BE COMBINED > ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED ARCHITECT D STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER CIVIL/SITE PLAN DRAWINGS REQUIRE STAMP BY WASHINGTON LICENSED CIVIL ENGINEER (P.E.) 9/9/99 udscpn".doc Current copy of Washington State Department of Labor and Industries Valid Contractor's License. If not available at the time of application, a copy of this license will be required before the permit is issued, unless the homeowner will be the builder OR submit Form H -4, "Affidavit in Lieu of Contractor Registration ". BuildingOwner /Authorized Agent If the applicant is other il. an'the owner, registered ` architect /engineer,. or contractor licensed by the State of Washington, a notarized letter frorri;the owner authorizing the agent to submit this permit application and obtain the permit will be required. as, part• of.this ' . I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, AND I AM AUTHORIZED TO APPLY FOR THIS PERMIT. I. '' A CITY OF TUKWI1,A ddriess: 14710 51 AV S I Permit Wit:, MI99 -01130 11; I �SU i to : I Tenant: � i Status: ISSUED Type: MISCPERM I Applied: 10/07/1999 Parcel #: 766160 -0030 i Issued: 12/20/1999 **********'*•*************'**•*****•*'****•******•***** *• * * * * * * *• * * * * * * *' * * * * * * * * ** * ** Permit Conditions: I ; , 1 . 1. No tree removal a l l o w e d . leap 1 i cant 1 must obtain and follow 1 advice of wetland bir laclist., .._.Th,e..c•.ear limits shall ue the edge J W ll�. T i ;outside e c f 1 r 1; �, g 1 .{ � e;,. �etl �nr�='bu�`fer;,,. +; alicanl; MUST install er os ion preve�rit�i:orr' Fand sed i me iit• r prevention measu,reper Xing' County Surface ''W iLer,, Desigr Manual, 1998 ed n, itio ei:t i:t;he blearing �r•iriy 1 •imi'Ls:, DEFORE c,c�mmenc i ng Orly, . other ic1 h v i i a lea1 ° „ I x : r l 4r i';'.,617( .� i ' ; 4' , I 1 i+ ;•I L n. :. . �. f 57 dt 47 r / ' sire :Gtiati'�"•"',':.'� w'«i�w , :'r t j t. S I 1 ' , li • r ,.� 0 f S N'.., . r December 1, 1999 Carol Lumb City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Development Permit Application Number MI99 -0180 Dear Carol: Attached hereto are four copies of a revised survey delineating the wetlands on the site. Pursuant to my conversations with Gary Schultz, I understand that this information is sufficient to complete the application. The intent of the permit is to knock down some brush (no trees will be affected) to enable the surveyors to complete their work. Once the survey has been completed a complete development application will be submitted. If there are any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (206) 442 -2751. Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY David Ray Principal ramrnell CrowCompany 900 Fourth Avenue Suite 3300 Seattle, Washington 98164 206 - 223 -0200 Fax 206 - 583 -8753 01519-ol _,.�,4a�5,: ?tt.`u • :� ' '.�..;:..�c."� -`' �• ... :1,:�'.e.:'i «3•,'�� Type: MISCPERM Zoning: LDR Coast Type: Gas /Elec.: Units: 000 Setbacks: North: Water: TUKWILA Wetlands: Contractor License No: Signature:_ Print Name:_ Occupancy: UBC: Fire Protection: .0 South: .0 East: .0 West: Sewer: TUKWILA Slopes: Y Streams: OCCUPANT TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY Phone: 14710 51 AV S, TUKWILA WA 98188 . OWNER BURNS SHEILA J 14710 51ST AVE S, SEATTLE WA 98168 CONTACT DAVID RAY Phone: 206 -44 900 FOURTH AV, SUITE 3300, SEATTLE WA 98164 *****************•************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Permit Description: NOCK DOWN BLACKBERRIES AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS UNDERGROWTH TO ENABLE SURVEY - CLEARING ONLY. ********************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Construction Valuation: $ 3,000.00 PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS: *(Water Meter Permits Listed Separate) Eng. Appr: Curb Cut /Access /Sidewalk /CSS: N Fire Loop Hydrant: N No: Size(in): .00 Flood Control Zone: N Hauling: N Start Time: End Time: Land Altering: Y Cut: 1 Fill: Landscape Irrigation: N Moving Oversized Load: N Start Time: End Time: Sanitary Side Sewer: N No: Sewer Main Extension: N Private: Public: Storm Drainage: N Street Use: N Water Main Extension: N Private: Public: **************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *, TOTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FEES: $ 23.50 **************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *, Permit Center Authorized Signature:_ Date:I I hereby certify that I have read aid examined this permit and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other state or local laws regulating construction or the performance of work. dam authorized to sign for and obtain this developmer • rmit. Date: 1?.�, 05 icaviD This permit shall become null and void if the work is not commenced within 180 days From the date of issuance, or if the work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days From the last inspection. October 7, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: rammellCrowCompany City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Miscellaneous Permit Application This letter is submitted in conjunction with an application for a permit to knock down some blackberries and other underbrush to enable Trammell Crow Company to commission a survey of the site to determine the feasibility of development. Pursuant to the M2 Submittal Checklist, several items are required in conjunction witli this submittal that are not currently available. The existing landscaping and topography are not currently available because a survey cannot be completed until the brush has been knocked down. The proposed replacement landscaping and topography will be developed at a later date when the scope of development has been determined. At this time we are not anticipating removing any of the trees on the site. RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT - 8 1999 PERMIT CENTER There is a stream on the eastern boundary of the property. The High Water Mark will be determined as part of the overall survey and Wetlands assessment of the site. The location of slopes 20% or greater, wetlands and watercourses and their buffers will be determined as a part of the survey. All of the information requested will be provided as soon as it is available and prior to any significant work being done on the site. In order to develop this information, it is necessary to knockdown some of the brush on the site to make it accessible. It is not the intent of this process to remove any of the brush but just to knock it down enough to enable the survey crew access to the site to perform their work. If there are any questions regarding our intentions please do not hesitate to call me at (206) 442- 2751. Sincerely, TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY David Ray Principal 900 Fourth Avenue Suite 3300 Seattle, Washington 98164 206- 223 -0200 Fax 206 - 583 -8753 OPUS. December 13, 2000 City of Tukwila Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 p is Northwest, L.L.C. 915 - 118th Avenue SE Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98005 425-453-4100 Fax 425-453-1712 RE: Pre - application submittal for Opus Park 5/405 Sincerely Opus Northwest, L.L.C. r 7 Andy Taber Senior Project IVlanager cc: John Hallstrom, Sconzo Hallstrom Architects Keith Goldsmith, Hugh Goldsmith & Associates Bart Brynestad, Opus Northwest, L.L.C. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. is an affiliate of the Opus Group of Companies — Architects, Contractors, Developers RECEIVED CITY OF T! !KWILA DEC 1 3 2000 i!EFtml Enclosed is our pre - application submittal package for your development review committee to review. The proposed project is an Opus Northwest, L.L.C. development of possibly two buildings on an assemblage of eight parcels of approximately 11.5 acres bounded by I -5 on the east, 51 Avenue South on the west, and South 151 Street on the south. The enclosed drawings contain the information requested on your pre - application checklist sheet H -8. The pre - application project summary is completed, however, a little additional information is provided here. There are two buildings, which could go in a single phase, or depending on the availability of financing and the demand for space, it could be phased over a period of two years. Building A.1 is approximately 65,000 square feet in three levels. The first level would be a flex -type space, which could be used for warehouse, manufacturing or office. The next two levels in the A.1 building would be office space. The second building, B.1, is a two -story building of approximately 37,000 square feet. The first floor could be warehouse, manufacturing or office, and the second floor would be office — there is no third floor. Building A.2 is an all -office building and is a possible alternative for A.1. The total number of parking stalls proposed is indicated on the summary for both buildings. The compact requirement, handicapped requirement and regular -sized stall requirement will all meet code. The storage of flammable or combustible materials is possible depending on the business of the tenant that leases the space. In the event that these materials are present, the storage and use of them will comply with local codes. Thank you for your assistance on this project. You may contact me at (425) 453 -4100 with any questions or comments. Atlanta, Austin, Chicago, Columbus, Dallas, Denver, Ft. Lauderdale, Houston, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Miami, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Orange County, Orlando, y�, V � w Pensacola, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, San Francisco, Seattle, Tampa, Washington D.C. x 957. + iwla3' ' '4? !' ,.Y. It snr .r , ,� .,'k �'r ,.w ssww,ti „5 wi ✓„�..,.N,.,:.,e..:.+�w..u..nwa .—_.. �.” ..._._... �v....�_,. —.—. 31 1•11• — �Yd. .�tittlo`rfrC��.YXk"1'JC''U"'c'�a 7ai:°veG•vih:;iuYit o�ifw:: r" tifi5;it`'s�.;i?;tv;��.+: %i'.�� u.:i:.:: HE INS..) . 1.IW i r 0002 330 V11/01111 30 CIO d5 7Sh'YL ,derr,"u 3ntn:�l.� d lC S 16'7E5 eg TEI 4. 0E'll DLO' 306 .co 1 naa'os EL'l ZEt'9L cg £9E't l 93'0 *039'13 9£9'39 00'1. 099'Et 1 E7. 399'96 11'3 t9 *0' *0L sots vga SfldO dgo semv aninog DEOD 091. 99L 961D 096 99L IEDO 093 994 6ZDD 09 3 99L • 630D 093 99L 1600 09 L 99L E600 093 99L Z60D 09: 99L I- ZI.O093 99L DE LO 09 3 99L 176D0 091 99L 060D 09 3 99L x C i nrn (same) raanki lgradtj; 1aladoid vrxtt ucrs `AO(! f Pre -App File No.: Date Received: Meeting Date: 12 -21 -00 Time: 2 30 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor o Project/Name: Cpu5 Pax-k. 5 NOS Site Address: 51 S. -+- S . Assessor Account No.: sty Lis + , '' $ (11 ,err pis Description of Proposal: A9pro -i --e..t toS SF w� ot& tO IA i t cU rtes i CtAnd 31, ego 5 F tM a Se Cc/IAA 61 o FILK. / CFeu Spauz Anticipated period of construction: From 3 2150 1 To ?r.4 QT i2 0.000, Will the project be developed in phases? ❑ No ❑ Yes Po55iloL If "Yes ", describe: 1c (AA. ey.cis 4 4, te _ cL■ , . 1 Identify existing eas.ements on site: 1 k If "Yes ", explain: Q, A• 1 OC•Fi Le. A •\ D PLQ �•1 NoY1.c FRE PSUM.DOC 8717/98 CITY OF TUKWILA Permit Center , 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 Number of parking stalls proposed: Regular: A0 r Project Value: 4/_ *icoo,po Z 1ou:i1d.i - Total Building Square Footage: ,c ype of Const uction: (1997 UBC) A •t 05� g 2�3 Covlcn Q� - >~�rca� Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s); use another sheet for additional floors. BUILDING USE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SQUARE FOOTAGE Current Assessed Value of Building: 0 t?7 Compact: l °1 cLe TOTAL TOTAL OTAL Acreage of Site (gross): `p+ oZ1,CoG�p S F S"bb SP S e1 -+20wi rup ) 1= l s sw c kx-AA-4-Di S 21�C'OO SF s\= Z ►' L VIP Handicapped: Storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on premise or area of construction? ❑ No ❑ Yes reA. t r!1' ?:.'x15 'rieN'-'v."rt { t 1�' .0:0 Y r. r : e.! rY9tY. �,.tz;s'worw'.?7k Darl • • r Company: Cw5 Moy, u 'hone:.. 3-17-98 Violation Location— Street Address: - d _ n rg o ra -I� ( r /3 5 , �v Si ` V ,� 6- ,t__c / �� Describe location j.,,, � � / / ' on property: 57// ��— a J s� P, (i.e., rear yard, behind garage) Alt , Cf� �,,r/ ,.,i'V u i Nature of report: ❑ Public Safety ❑ Employee Safety Cher: ❑ Nuisance Tenant/Landlord /Owner �1 information (if known): / 5 7 57 j % Anonymity requested? ::: Yes _ No S Describe hazard /problem in detail: i1.A • . • I : .41∎ A_ 104 i.■ 4 / /∎ 11 ; /11 l / ! iii, 4 kr!!7/Qt /s � / �L . /A , • 4 . / , i 1 . J — i' / j .0 Namn /L , �r , _y���- d�l!/1�� � / Employee — Dept: inOOa _Visitor Request contact? = Yes vr/ : No Address: �� Home phone: Wor ph one: Anonymity requested? ::: Yes _ No J j'� /�.� er' REQUEST City of Tukwila REQUEST FOR ACTION RFA File # FORWARD TO: ❑ CODE ENFORCEMENT ❑ FIRE DEPARTMENT ❑ POLICE DEPARTMENT • PARKS /RECREATION UB WKS - Engineering ❑ PJB'WKS - Utilities ?nCD - Planning Division ❑ DCD - Building Division KC ANIMAL CONTROL ❑ CITY CLERK OFFICE CITY ATTORNEY OTHER: REPORTED BY: REQUEST TAKEN BY: Name: ACTION Responding City Department: Response by (name): Department: Corrective measures taken or assistance given (if "None ", explain): Routing: White copy to Mayor's office; yellow and pink copies to responding department. Date received: Date: Date of response: �m�cx:x w ors e b��tS4 r: �rcY r;!� A weei?:7*AAS4W OM Mitrr City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS DATE: February 6, 2001 APPLICANT: Opus Northwest RE: MI01 -018 ADDRESS: 51 Avenue South and South 151 Street Please review the following comments listed below and submit your revisions accordingly. If you have any questions on the requested revision, Carol Lumb is the planner assigned to the file and can be reached at 206 - 431 -3661. 1. No clearing may occur until the location of all wetland boundaries have been mapped. There is a wetland area on the western portion of the site, in the vicinity of lots 0120 and 0121. This area was identified and discussed at the pre - application meeting on December 21, 2000. 2. It appears that the mapped wetland boundary on the southeastern portion of the site does not match the boundary surveyed for the Trammell Crow Company (the Trammell Crow survey shows an area of approximately 1.92 acres while the area identified by Opus is 1.34 acres). This is also the case for the wetland area at the northern end of the project site. Please explain the discrepancies between the two wetland surveys. 3. It appears that a regulated stream, located just north of 14634 51 Avenue South, has been ditched the length of the stream into a wetland area. This work was done without a permit. Please submit a mitigation/restoration plan for the disturbed areas. When the revisions are submitted, they will be peer reviewed by the City's environmental consultant. cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist c:\mydocs \general\200I - Memo \m i01- 018.doc Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 Project Name/Tenant: 5 - r '- I �- G L) Value of Construction: li; 3� CXzC Site Address : City State/Zip: 6f- A CtG ccf Tax Parcel Number: Property Owner: I C QOn0'1tr I I Cr Cc. rat(gyp l Phone: (Za 6, ) 442 - Z1.S1 • Street Address: I City State /Zip: 9c 4— (vc �u;,j r� ?? c) 6ru I,, 1,1A 98 # /,4 Fax #: (Zcse. ) 6 - 8"7.C3 / Contractor: ,1 Grc,�rn �; y .i • C r i av Phone: (206 ) 246 -945-43 Street Address: , State/Zip: 6.4x2 ui� 144 Si I v,k tiv; ) V/A crs1(8 Fax #: ( ) Architect: Phone: ( ) Street Address: ' City State/Zip: Fax #: ( ) 0 Water Engineer: Phone: ( ) Street Address: City State/Zip: Fax #: ( ; ) C Person Phone: (244. )442 I Street Address:• 1 City State/Zip: 9d 4 1-11 A N/6 su, I _3Rd3 S$ l(, 9816.4 Fax #: (2a( 6'83- 8 '7 S3 ' MISGELIANE OVS ':PERMITfREVI REQUESTED: (TO' REFILLED OUTBYAPPLICANT) .... , :., :;`: =: -; ;:. • Description of II work to be done (please be specific): JJ / Knock GLO'J• b1Gs.;k bcrrics cttncL .,ikcr mixt. I1Qv1Cesc4 4 1 , 1.9� raw -3iCI ic) CA.4Iok. 54r vC1 • Will there be storage of flammable/combustible hazardous material in the building? ❑ yes El no Attach list of materials and stora ge location on separate 8 1/2 X Lpaper indicating quantities & Material Safety Data Sheets ' ❑ Above Ground Tanks U Antennas /Satellite Dishes U Bulkhead /Docks ❑ Commercial Reroof El Demolition ❑ Fence ❑ Manufactured Housing - Replacement only ❑ Parking Lots El Retaining Walls ❑ Temporary Facilities 0 Tree Cutting MONTHLY SC•RVICE,:BI LLI h1GS:iTO;l. +:w:. ; i sin '' .... , :., :;`: =: -; ;:. • ; ' • Name: • Phone: Address: City /Sta e/Zip: • 0 Water 0 Sewer 0 Metro 0 Standby CITY OF i, : : ; '(KWI LA Permit Center 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 Project Number: Permit Number: M1-11- oleo Miscellaneous Permit Application Application and plans must be complete in order to he accepted for plan review. Applications will not be accepted through the mail or facsimile. ;APPLICAN1 REQUEST;FOR MISCELLANEOUS PUBLIC WORKS PERMITS ❑ Channelization /Striping ❑ Flood Control Zone ❑ Landscape Irrigation ❑ Storm Drainage ❑ Water Meter /Exempt # ❑ Water Meter /Permanent # ❑ Water Meter Temp # ❑ Miscellaneous ❑ Curb cut/Access /Sidewalk Cl Fire Loop /Hydrant (main to vault) #: Size(s): ❑ Land Altering: 0 Cut cubic yards 0 Fill_ cubic yards 0 sq. ft.grading/clearing ❑ Sanitary Side Sewer #: ❑ Sewer Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public ❑ Street Use ❑ Water Main Extension 0 Private 0 Public 0 Deduct 0 Water Only Size(s): Size(s): Size(s): Est. quantity: gal Schedule: ❑ Moving Oversized Load /Hauling WA:TEI2,METER i D.. EROSlT /kEFUND''B I LLING: ; :' ,`: Name: Address: Phone: City /Sta e/Zip: Value of Construction - In all cases, a value of construction amount should be entered by the applicant. This figure will be reviewed possible revision by the Permit Center to comply with current fee schedules. Expiration of Plan Review - Applications for which no permit is issued within 180 days following the date of application shall expire building official may extend the time for action by the applicant for a period not exceeding 180 days upon written request by the in Section 107.4 of the Uniform Building Code (current edition). No application shall be extended more than once. 9/9/99 y misrpmi.doc 6;i(4 hr µ,7;L" « rpT6vt et` ,r '. °y_ai ^r, < ycY:s r... .�... .., s. cj.pr. e +;•a .;,: and is subject to by limitation. The applicant as defined . Date application accepted: Date application expires: Ap ion taken by: (initials) l': \REI)I:VVI'UK \VII.A COMMI:RCIAI. \Pictures \titahilizcd Slope \Stabilized slope liusi Pointe ?due Mechanically Stabilized Earth System Close -up of stabilized slope mat material used to stabilize the soil. Tukwila file No.s 1,o I-050 and MI-018 Z ~ W uj JO 00 u) 0 LLI -i _ W o CL = a w z = I— o Z t— WW 0 0 - 0 I— w I HI- -O Z W 0 O Z P e/ - {Iff)7J ) p % Y - � ' A. -�' . \ 4C .97‘‘ Y ° art �i l .�.,� 4. ;.. � rte^ _t� •t `'�� . :. �. =� c: .. _._ -_:• alt yi;a; ►.� y am; = '.' : .t•� ( � `1��a - . Li•�ag s '� f L% 1� l ' r � 1 te..`• :?, S t�rl��}�ir.-• • �� � A�f�jsn �r�r: 4• �. i � � y am - ��,Y�j����c :/� ���� � �1r � - ..: �.ty.� �• t. l�':. �JJ Y'..'• �/. � w' rL�i�i .is"`�.�{�!t'!�"_� � — �n�� - - - - -':S MNitnS �.�.!?l.i �_�1l (.1 /�,y/> f�t-�rl��.j trudi3�� .�'1)�ir �•�;„ -- +. � P: \Rlil)IiV\'I'UK\VII. COMMI:IZCIAI. \Pictures \Stabilized Slope \Stabilized slope last Pointe 2.doc Mechanically Stabilized Earth System Close -up of stabilized slope mat material used to stabilize the soil. Tukwila File Nos Lul -050 and F01 -018 Z Z C J O O 0 U) (1) J = w w • < a � z I- 0 z I - ww U O — ❑I- LL! 2 I-- 11 �Z U 0 Z n r n r_ Li LI LI 1 N 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Plants growing on stabilized slope. Mechanically Stabilized Earth System P: \REDEV \TUKWILA COMMERCIAL \ Pictures \Stabilized Slope \Stabilized slope East Pointe I.doc Tukwila File No.s 1.o1-050 and 1:01 -018 Mechanically Stabilized Earth System Stabilized slope at landscape and parking level. Landscape area at top of stabilized slope. 1 \TUKWILA CONIMERCIALAPictures\Slabilized Slope\Stabilized slope East Pointe 1.doc Tukwila File No.s 1.01-050 and I:01-01S NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Attachment B Z Z W Q • 2 J U 0 U) • LLI J I F- U) LL WO r Q r • < U p Z 1— O Z I— WW 2 p 0 co 0— p I— Ww I h- - O .. Z W U= O ~ z 4:t -46 cra NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. z II— F- Z Lu W 0 00 0) 0 w W I _1 I __ LL w 0 :=1 u_ < I C5 w z 1-0 z i- w w 2 0 o2 LIJ w I LU 0- r - u_ 0 ; z F 0 1— z Z W D JU 0 U) �) J W rt < U 2 W Z = I- O Z I- W Lu � p U O (12 ID I- WW 2 I- - �' O .. Z W F- O Z ? ^ «. y,;r+: ,. . M .. . 'rr::. ._ .. Y; �;,,.. sr7?+ �Fws�y: 3�us� ,a.'M:IM�!h'kY�:;'p.+'�it�'� gg04 Mtleck 5nIPOS 4 qtr = r, iN .! *34gV,AW. L9 t r 1Mtftt?%s? IAWAr-F'sy.�'r;6:%'� qn C /1Sr• .0 1�wl Yii�fl�bi+Geir.rr�e�in.a`.:,•i. I Fhn r • too' C• • 11111111•14.1•1 • 1111.1 11•1110.11 w•11 n 1••1111 1 e O +0 ■eo +all. r . to 110121 [K 3 711 d Y1t Y I - n riX 1:41 K d tLur AYll "' I. 1011101/ tMOA5I10n1 • 1 x Cie, d KCr111 IYIY. F• .rq •glnYFU1 m ruii:<D I t. b wn d n., FII. t° M • MdtD to FNtIN Cdre11 F Oxa•1 tIM1 K[Ir1.hI 11 lIN d t �o•Cl•Ie M.tT ltMn uMi• fe. IY t iaD • iild 10�K tl� O t +�• : n 1:111 :It 11o u N °WKl V rN I• YN K r55i •fn M 11aia or rii°�tij,lllN cowl re IIKn r 5.° e d 0x..11 1011 1 Nan v�[K 5 :.�°i+:. r,.xt aN 111 w �ew nu°rRl•Nllvlt t :�� la :iT�• l°itlllr°OIPI•!w •°OD01 fl~'Kwilul° A 'i° H x w .=1 ur :i1:1 °i 'F Y ruts+ 11 7.11$' 1anD a L a ir ' :ili11eK51at ti l's DLO Ie /11 /10ne 11 m1lrltnl 0011 ralge o '""" 104 • .. tr5:1n tl IIM I.. /0[011 Il I dlY I Il/II /lee° I) MID 0011 14II /lees IT 10115 0011 1e/11/I0e0 rl 1n1I1 1001 lI/tl /1ew MAC, 1055 1 II 111110 11111 I0M /1115 11 ID 51.1 .01 DI 011.01 ."74`.= Ktit7 xI • .1Ia11:111[lri :1i° CDII 1175" hI4 IIID Kn. 1 •.D.YI IrK.11 nn NNW KK IIr1IO n 1501. uvcl. 10 M I M I .ro .11.11. vvr 11o111K.v1i: 11tH .ro•b1e ..°1 1. 1+5 ° wt1�a 101 NKD...1 cauum I. 101 a 5 cl. -1+r m 1 1 1. a0 iaxu a 1011 ro >o<.11e aura 1110.1 5• N xnvtunt rw . 1.11aau 1w5xu N+a. a :r 11. 10Y . •.° rb.In 1a. t ttuwll+ ut m,lxuT .re nI <CI� to K.S�a N IN r•1wc1 noclm+ Iw..o m11n1ct1a ILIALIKAC k i ni:.. taw 11nt 0111a1 nl. .0101 r ..1 O15511,[I1D +K111tY Nr1•R•1 IYIINIFIa d 101 x 1 t KS/11•11 MCI K,1 i ,aq 1 :� : °nNhi 1 Ib r 1 �F o 1014[11 .1Ix IN . IIK d 11 1 1, . 1 051 r 1 11 lr 1 I. 111 IN.111 IC .lt 1 .. 100. 1.111.1 10 . MD M Id w • , + 1.14 ' . .I Nr hN n N m a �a l a t5 � : : �tc:iwo c 1 :: R1�:°ot:ulr':'1:.m :.ir:l Fd °fOlttuFlh. 1w5 .x IN al. d Iud1u. [w°T a CI . d .11.11•1 1.10 t.1 a. 1 10 11111 Kra r 01) [rtr > a 1111'[ t I Kri 114.1 ,u Kt RIi rtlt•dD 1x MIIC t Ftrt = tat r 50001111x 1 M (av[r VIr1a 0J11151 M. 404. r 1.1 x1°1•T q. 11 11Ia11 M t n a M1Y, or •1K. not d 1.1.151 Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. s i) Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1110 I111G Ammo SE Bellevue. IA 11001 P.O. Bt+ 1002 Belime. IA 56009 72L• 12 126 0 101 -1000 TAX• 102 -7710 Dll x•.111.1 De Dam 1 PSI, SOW OPUS N.T. L.LC. CITY OF TUNTA.A TOPOGRAPHIC AND BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 TAIIMOTON 0002 MIT C -1 Z W 0 0O to 0 co W J = H • LL W O • a to 0 = � Z = 1- O Z ~ O • D- o I- WW _ I- • O z w F- _ O � Z rtnirArliA1::=1 P474 =Ur "'"'" 141 Of fa ORO,. MI Manila OCTRIsof• SY ROO tiort*.$ RCI RO 110 11.1t ORorl• ROO Itsti r • St tb n9 Hugh C. Goldsmith k Associates, Inc. sti Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 114th beton 51 11■1150354. SU 05004 P.O. 547 3545 Tfl P428 4 4 11:71 9 :: 0.11.544. WA 55000 SCIICArtso R.1.1. Or •R•.. coo. T • • sage. rict,• Ooloo RID Of OMER ••••pollO OCR's... AC.14•••■■ 0.1111 .0.1.01 Mfg OHM. ILO 11. 0,11. PIO'. SM. noose OMR? CITY or 112(WILA OPUS lit LJ..C. SENSITIVE AREA AND TREE SURVEY FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 441141443014 osit. 00 C-2 0 60 1•0 w u: 1. • 60• J elvlc :. 1 [i°ui r ile l 2:01 i.oY =11. ..cxt[cu vuia Hugh G. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. ) b Comulling Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1016 11116 6••11u. a 6.0.00.. 60 00004 P.O. 6.0 3666 6.0.01.. [6 66006 un ( [6[ -we0 T[[: 1 1[61 u[ -nil PRIMARST ATE HIGHWAY N LE al's: :il�Mx.. •� marviror ls.R. 51 RzErit .4 r.. • • 94.40. 401 • u PRELIMINARY GRADING. PAVING, d DRAINAGE PLAN FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY 00 TUKOLA OPUS N W. LL C. 1 \\ -- - —.. -- WA [N01 0T ON ) 00112 C -3 Z • w _J C3 O 0 cn 0 W = ALL. w 2 U_ < c = w Z � F- O Z I- w • w U O '12 O F- lu w F— u"0 w z U59- F- _ O F- z 1 —•�—z —rte 0 .0 Tout r•30' 1XISTI•TQ 6 nl • UTILITY POLE 1— GUY MUTE • TELE M11 • MAN. SOK • WATER METER +• MDR jj WATER VALVE PROPOSFQ M TEE DATE VALVE • RATER METER • REDUCER • L OUT 0 Hugh C. Goldsmith & Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1215 I•SW L.m.. R 0.11•. ,,.. IL 15001 P.O. O.. 3555 0.11T4.. TA 10003 71L• 1105) 112 -1050 111: 125 102 -7711 r; PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO 1 P.R. 51 _ )C I lI 11 1111 1 1 11 Y LI IJ I.UJ 1 • 5121 AVE SOUTH ...•.....r.� •. - �_,,,�.•._..._._ D9_ �_. ... .. _ .. .a.n nl :' 1: ONE 81 �• • •.1... 1•00 0.00 7600 ••u•. µ' 1• w• 1. •. 16 r 4.00 emrIle S •. 0•00 • 4.00 .2 3.00 0600 OPUS NIL. L LC 00 1:11 0.00 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TIIKRLA IYAININOTON 1"11".;'.' 00 0 C -4 z ~ aa • � J U O 0 CO 0 W W CO LL W 2 N z � W I- • W 0 (-2 0 I— W w L 2 w z U2 O ~ z 0 2500 5000 I" = 5000' 0 Hugh G. Goldsmith Sc Associates, Inc. Consulting Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 1216 114th Avenue SE Bellevue, WA 98004 P.O. Box 9686 Bellevue, WA 98009 TEL: (425) 482 -1080 FAX: (425) 482 -7719 PLOTTED: 00112V01dvg RNIX 04/23/0111:07 SCALE: 3000' DATE: Apr II, 2001 DRAWN: RNIX DESIGNED: APPROVED: ACAD DWG.: 00112V01 VIEW: XREF: LSE: FLO BK: PG 0: PSSF: VICINITY MAP OPUS PARK 5/405 CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON JOB NO: 00112 SHEET . vll>+Y:r;sA:'tU +F ,.:: i= r .Sn, : .s " ; F P.T �'`e, < .�v y ' • "f i r . . Y Thal..!. 7 /c/q C/ Ty LIM /rs, o,ea. /0 /4" • c, • o Y lc••Oo b p b R .< • 004 N ✓ /:iO O s. ■ a o b GI • ` • 73. SP 77 TU 7. 10140681 Y LA/. : /v. : FoY. & /h4 G 7b /7Jk Ki/ 4 o 3.c.s9sras : 6p/2o/o72 0 • C - O V 0 5 /S T AVE N y0 64 p 30 134.its "ZS 2-‘ C.° M L ar .0. 2s •pN Jo u ..a IS 78 E - I 4 TU SP =- 34 -SS > a u � 790125/881 Si. • u t. • a . ° - b► . ta N O r 0 toll. ' X / /t�t��__ ! t` ..r. V `. er 7s 78 yj ...%� 77 O �' S32'SECJ/�k 75.7N � ` N d- O 3 c tr t ° Ste NZ1 ON c ep b.. ▪ e\ C' h ao NI ° a t � e, 7.5 75. 72 -, C 0 • JO 0 329. s C. 591-ye4 P r � c ): ) 9 ;," 5 . 6 5 1; o c e . S e - O a s P LW LAr• ytiA w cq c/ry L/,�( /7'l °eo. - /570 1 1 154.2.6 Ts 1 � S d LN C S t �s 5 L� CI e+ :) A /64.62.5 0 -4 100 30 SO 37 . VCA .SC. 3.042.71 u (CI o _ a: ""a w c •17p /64.62.5 9 O / 1 " NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 0 0 o 2 _ rib ccrt f4 th1P { r, _i.1... n t ,,n r -sr.•• L in tha ' 1 •,u I,,.QU;. :t/ ,�;::::,: Citic3 ,, rte., ;, t /... r Cy 4 : ru,cw /,u 6 =f22 I /¢a. 2.9300 -... -. _ - .57 37 :.141.6.11 ^ a, C.39iiJ /� 329.69 {P.) ;.�1: •gj a�� s S 1V • (; . ) • M N 32.9. 2.5 2634 (.q) O 0 - 0 kas li� t. it h: • 4: 4. O 00 P: to t� - N 1 9Z1 1S 1 : -� ■ o N '0 o a 0 , ,.....,......... :,..,....._ „ ......v,.....0,.. .......,it„. ..._ .., IP left0,,,. I -21 1 , I i ,,,, , 4 f t 1 0 1110 ;, c. )4 4/11.,..V.0=ttt' c --..- • 1 Amei0 ,,,, NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. Sturtip CwMn.n.dd a 0 Hugh 0. Goldsmith R Associates, toe. Consulting Eagincers• Surveyors • Planners 111111411 Ara.. II Minn, VA Still p 0.5 3 3151 131 .0 TIL:(411) 111.1111 1.15. (1111411.1111 O Pc li Canna.* F1-44. 7Td5! Y. TAIL M! Tr tre-Cmiel 61..• n+ .�m.w MOM d n "SIP id7i. annoy Wee =.1 .4.t...oll1 InozrlLtco041w1 .0. ll.v..r Y nr...y nn L»NDECAPS GENERAL NOTES tl/ O Yln. lP TT TOl I u mw^oe . Vv. eo 1w a... ...s F W s a puhwA Y rrpLp rcrlol. P� ` M 1 ..,...� l w l i i I::'laY` I :••.y1�� I � d �i w�pl�. n..,d. L I1 p1 YM=i . 2174 . n ;:==i.11wtAll tririu11 R a 3 Pap. . rod. a ,.. w 11 dN ad ppnbw- ww Lw6�M wy �.ws YM w".w w b + i ,l n i nn. Inn pal. 1 _ .a wl Y ry . oat dM Ly11abp all 1.1111.1 CMJi ara • 7 .6. , I ' igralosi N r�°S°• enrol w:M Y W n iY d�il..M.n b cook a I4Mdw M Tavbr.0.�04...Iw.dtK1 a Ammon but la Nnwy AI n. 11.1 1 Y► n. . wr law.,d'ilWward w pl. l.p wasp d h�.wlw.l bndo4.Mlaa pr,n.d 4m..1 am Y M.Y M va.11 n ga111tl•• p4..M dalwM y. VC40 b .Owp 1.. b Va•o wn.v ►�.��yµV n.An . q�iYl�il . g 1.,dO � n : 0 y 1 WOal r..1.i= d =nWl v... w 6.6. " 11. lW pY.� .Veca= " P.b.wwQ YN.,r l•.rYe.id +.al/o. PL. - r a - Pe. � n .1 q � . y. r ,. wl Old M I1 ryal. • p. 1rw1 TM1•ll i. p11. u. 1.1 I .k.. I+.a /d.vl 2tlw vti..IM of par a+d wl...r1a eon a •N d•'• CaYU�.Wrw.IwK - . wnMw• - 1 J",�. v.�..vv..dd ..au n...111a..11 b. alrwv.*a.w nw+o. U - Vf p b w izo: J • ��tia�� C IA d+pn�ri I wdyMa ,lldvw a � Z.:I,p�°rl p ua Y. ry to �p.�d1(l,.p�, aa.r tnr a1.u 1 wu1� .a Y MI Cowry w ba...pp•w.d e04 1 w w 14 Ian nab. an .N 11� m1.ul Jp r a,d W d. Ww Io1b.g rnw a/ OM, u. InnW .fa ., n 4i1 400 !a pa .a. nTodwd.... * . O .. p. ga 1M 400% ... yw� 1.0.� S. yNylw MI1• no.W1v �.�pa.1.1 MI SPy 1co .a L.w ilb �Y ..�NaO . Y•.F dy Ord WM IYU•• o l bw 15.1 .d CAONA.a,w �dwllK m.1 kr PAS. now w bel.o Wa� i r - .M ... IrN \ww V'. ,a M1V. C r.1.1WI.YW 4.N '1:111 wfw.e ra [ y -ap 1 .• 11.‘ W IW Y.d aw. � Y, ; i. .^I. rWlww.w..i'1 .I.. 1311. M af. ri rd. unny ten. ea LL MANR,MI>1 , n -.i.t .m Yaw.w .1 11..1 p.11 V. W1a. pac.O ram. d..a d1.. w a wn p �.ontnn �Jp.aY n.o �dd�w W oN. M d.W Ay ,.WN4.11 M1rlwgw .l n.n.ralL,,,,aa V.M.•r•••• p. cbM q,.y M1 � !?' �.� M •1 110 p,, 0.14 WI a .� o� M . e tg a w.o a aw . •Ianoon. T!M...f I of no f .%n i t.a. d il. r.p4 �• o1wW aOE .p.1.0 Yw .auYdw..•r /. s.w a. no way.amW.ew N [ilMl11• 4 affi �aY - • mw.t, wf NLpawi•.I�.n a 11.11 r ind lh. pi 1 da.w otaus 'A ll.•n.a Y i►p I, raCto wa pllMl. • 1 ACM P. un !IP NO N w Inn PLANT LEGEND IR100. CNN Nana • 0 0 O • I,aYY U ilr l iw lb Op,W IS. Pull •+ tv•ead Mr Vim .11t:N Or.w t niAP "e %pied d ILn Y mYn 1111,4 ea. W, d 4.1' Mw .1....• Y .aw, Po.. Ow M4wv+ . t/..1 M1 P. 1• ul 1n.A w,d. rows M1 W c ThM.clw norms 3 CA LMP CN..v 01r norms norms p1. *nod Fin ▪ / + ^1M. Von 1 uL lau Po. MA . plL a p�,l o e 1 . � S An MII L.,r.K W.. ,,, Y W 1 1�•w1. 14 'ryr pw Sp T nl J�Oq�1V.OIGM�{[MI io. p t 00C, Ic*1 U. ., . M M 11!00 oerxrmus Dar 5IZ! ■/O II!?IAIatA 9 wok u Bal w 7ro1M Wan' t •Mnla ▪ al �Mi l 11 14111 M MM o WI `•q.1a.w � ; � y 1�� Y 1 d � 41"nw WIC017•31..4 'Omni.. BUN .� Nov C•wp .p.i. M1 pM 11.d 11r T.1.N N. ep.��M1 I ww1 r=121 C.��.1 CCM.. oaf.. 1 �MP"ilw iLta OITIMA .lake. D•13q,M 1.w Mtevi =14 -, sal Lon 14/• . rr.nlo°'s 40.4.4 .1 Tom lee .pponl Ia.I 1ad0* .p.n. I. Ippw.. OPUS N.Y. L.L.C. Ae W. 0 1140 COUNTY PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OPUS N.W. L.L.0 WASHINGTON L -2 .i:•k yse x .,.sue. 4 Z • Z • W J U U 0 W a J H- • LL W O < ° � Z = H- • 0 W • W O 0 ,^ • V/ II H- W • W H- u" 0 1• Z W U = 0 Z 2 F. ..; • • • • • • • ••• • • •• • NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. NORTHWEST REGION 1010 South 336th Street, Suite 215 Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 838 -1054 AGENCY OPERATIONS 320 108th Avenue, N.E., Suite 651 Bellevue, Washington 98004 (425) 452 -5353 TITLE AGENTS Washington Benton • Clallam • Clark • Cowlitz • Franklin Island • Jefferson • Lewis Pacific • Skagit • Yakima Oregon Benton • Curry • Deschutes • Jackson Klamath • Lane • Linn • Marion Polk • Umpqua • Yamhill COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSNAIION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Transnation A L NDAMEAICA COMPANY I OFFICE: 101 Gateway Centre Parkway, Gateway One Richmond, Virginia 23235 -5153 B 1004 -274A 4 • NORTHWEST REGION Washington Chelan - Douglas Counties 700 N. Mission Street, Wenatchee, WA 98807 (509) 662 -4721 • King County 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 100 Park Place Building Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 628 -4650 Kitsap County 9619 Levin Road N.W., Silverdale, WA 98383 (360) 692 -4556 Okanogan County 715 Okoma Drive, Omak, WA 98841 (509) 422 -3490 • Pierce County 6111 100th Street S.W. Lakewood, WA 98499 (253) 589 -1488 • Snohomish County 2939 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201 (425) 252 -1156 Spokane County North 720 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212 (509) 922 -2222 Thurston County 3905 Martin Way East, Suite A, Olympia, WA 98506 (360) 459-2331 Oregon Multnomah • Clackamus • Washington Counties 12360 East Burnside Portland, OR 97223 (503) 256 -7400 z ~ W 6 — I C.) 00 U W I - I-- tn u_ W O Q = • a • W Z I— O Z F— W W U 0 O — O 1- W W I I- 0 - Z W U = O ▪ ~ z • CLTA .. g ANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the ocr..upancy, use; or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) and AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY (10- 17 -92) The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lion or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded In the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest Insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. SCHEDULE B STANDARD EXCEPTIONS SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - STANDARD COVERAGE AND CLTA STANDARD COVERAGE LOAN POLICY 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other (acts which a correct survey of the land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under workmen's compensation acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS APPEARING IN ALTA OWNER'S POLICY - EXTENDED COVERAGE 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Underground easements, servitudes or installations which are not disclosed by the public records. 3. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 4. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 5. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. 1004 -274A NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT. 12" MINIMUM 3/4" MINUS WASHED GRAVEL SEE NOTE 12" 6 "(MIN.) — RUCTURAL Fl •L„ 4" DIAMETER PERFORATED PVC PIPE Terra NOTE: :•• ••• Associates, Inc. • otechnical Consultants tAt SLOPE TO DRAIN NOT TO SCALE L 3" BELOW PIPE MIRADRAIN G100N PREFABRICATED DRAINAGE PANELS OR SIMILAR PRODUCT CAN BE SUBSTITUTED FOR THE 12 -INCH WIDE GRAVEL DRAIN BEHIND WALL, DRAINAGE PANELS SHOULD EXTEND A MINIMUM OF SIX INCHES INTO 12 -INCH THICK DRAINAGE GRAVEL LAYER OVER PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE. " t".3iry5at ' Watt ?i ::x ` 7 :,( 1 • L«':r 4 12" OVER PIPE ?• EXCAVATED SLOPE (SEE REPORT TEXT FOR APPROPRIATE INCLINATIONS) RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL OPUS PARKS 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Proj.No. 4800 Date SEPT 2001 I Figure 3 z '~ W Ce 00 U) 0 W W I I -- • w w g Q • Cr w z � I-- z I— w W O • — O I— O w L i' O w .z — • I O - ~ z APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING Opus Park 5/405 Tukwila, Washington On November 2, 2000, we performed our field exploration using a rubber -tired backhoe. We explored subsurface soil conditions at the site by excavating seven test pits to a maximum depth of 15 feet below existing grade. The test pit locations are shown on Figure 2. The test pit locations were approximately determined by measurements from existing property features. The Test Pit Logs are presented on Figures A -2 through A -5. A geotechnical engineer from our office conducted the field exploration and classified the soil conditions encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained representative soil samples, and observed pertinent site features, All soil samples were visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) described on Figure A -1. Representative soil samples obtained from the test pits were placed in closed containers and taken to our laboratory for further examination and testing. The moisture content of each sample was measured and is reported on the Test Pit Logs. Project No. T -4800 . tiv .2`x_'1?e?; >r*tY`..;t'nariri;.. a3.P- a'.c - ' . aa •' s' f .",,2.ti� <r`.G:c1�.:kbL'if�l_t brn +gy m; MAJOR DIVISIONS LETTER SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION COARSE GRAINED SOILS More than 50% material larger than No. 200 sieve size GRAVELS More than 50% of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve Clean Gravels (less than 5% fines) GW Well graded gravels, gravel - sand mixtures, little or no fines. GP Poorly- graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines. Gravels with fines GM Silty gravels, gravel- sand -silt mixtures, non - plastic fines. ( jC Clayey gravels, gravel- sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. SANDS More than 50% of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve Clean Sands (less than 5% fines) SW Well- graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines. SP Poorly- graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines. Sands with fines SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures, non- plastic fines. SC Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures, plastic fines. FINE GRAINED SOILS More than 50% material smaller than No. 200 sieve size SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is less than 50% ML Inorganic silts, rock flour, clayey silts with slight plasticity. CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, (lean clay). OL Organic silts and organic clays of low plasticity. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid limit is greater than 50% MH Inorganic silts, elastic. CH Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. OH Organic clays of high plasticity. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat. DEFINITION OF TERMS AND SYMBOLS SAND or GRAVEL Standard Penetration Density Resistance in Blows /Foot 2" OUTSIDE DIAMETER SPLIT I SPOON SAMPLER 2.4" INSIDE DIAMETER RING SAMPLER OR SHELBY TUBE SAMPLER Y WATER LEVEL (DATE) Tr TORVANE READINGS, tsf Pp PENETROMETER READING, tsf DD DRY DENSITY, pounds per cubic foot LL LIQUID LIMIT, percent PI PLASTIC INDEX N STANDARD PENETRATION, blows per foot Very loose 0-4 Loose 4 -10 Medium dense 10 -30 Dense 30 -50 Very dense >50 SILT or CLAY Standard Penetration Consistency Resistance in Blows /Foot Very soft 0 -2 Soft 2 -4 Medium stiff 4 -8 Stiff 8 -16 Very stiff 16 -32 Hard >32 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON ;�: •r.' ' : : ,t Associates, Terra Inc. . ��� Proj. No. T-4800 Date SEPT 2001 Figure A -1 Geotechnlcal Consultants y ; :54•as , .Yr`r'rarli:+�y}.. • • Z a = z 00 0 w I— CD w w 0 � • d = w H . z F I= o z I— LL! w U � co O — O I- w I— u W Z U 0~ z 8 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. 22.6 22.5 �.. Brownish -gray silty SAND with gravel, loose to medium dense, moist, fill. (SM) Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist to damp. (SM) Gray slightly silty SAND with gravel to clean gravelly SAND, medium dense, wet. (SM /SP) Test pit terminated at 14.5 feet. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 11.5 feet. Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 Terra Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Test Pit No. TP -1 Soil Description FILL: tannish -brown silty sand witlgravel, loose, moist to dry. (SM) Test pit terminated at 4 feet. No groundwater encountered. Test Pit No. TP -2 Soil Description Proj. No. T -4800 Approximate Elev. 98 Moisture Content ( %) Approximate Elev. 96 Moisture Content ( %1 TEST PIT LOGS OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Date SEPT 2001 Figure A -2 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 5 10 15 Test Pit No. TP -3 Soil Description 12 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Reddish -brown silty SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist to dry. ISM) Brownish -tan silty fine to medium SAND, medium dense, moist. (SM) Gray slightly silty GRAVEL with cobbles, medium dense to dense, wet. (GM /GP) 21.5 Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. Light groundwater seepage below 7 feet. Terra Associates, inc. Geotechnlcal Consultants Test Pit No. TP -4 Soil Description 2 feet dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. Brownish -gray silty SAND to clean gravelly SAND, medium dense, moist, becomes wet. (SM/SP) Gray fine sandy SILT with clay, medium stiff, damp to wet. (ML) Gray clean SAND with gravel, medium dense, wet. (SP) 15.9 22.5 Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. Moderate groundwater seepage encountered at 6 feet. Proj. No. T -4800 Approximate Elev. 90 Moisture Content ( %) Approximate Elev. 89 Moisture Content ( %) TEST PIT LOGS OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Date SEPT 2001 Figure A -3 z a � 6 JU 00 CO J E— W g Q I et W Z� H O Z U • 0 0 S O H WW I • o w Z ▪ = 0 z 14 inches brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. 6.6 13.4 Reddish -brown silty SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist to dry. (SM) Brownish -tan silty fine to medium SAND with some gravel, medium dense, moist. (SM) ' Test pit terminated at 14 feet. No groundwater encountered. Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02100 Depth (ft.) 0 10 15 Terra Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Test Pit No. TP -5 Soil Description Test Pit No. TP -6 Soil Description Proj. No. T -4800 Approximate Elev. 102 Moisture Content ( %) Approximate Elev. 109 Moisture Content %) 8 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. FILL: dark gray gravelly silty SAND with brick, asphaltic concrete, concrete, rebar, loose to medium dense, moist. (SM) Brown silty SAND with gravel, medium dense, moist. (SM) 13.1 10.5 Test pit terminated at 11.5 feet. No groundwater encountered. TEST PIT LOGS OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Date SEPT 2001 Figure A -4 z z w 6 _.t U 0 N CO W J U LL. W 0 g ? c y = z �- zo W W D O U O � 01- W W U L - 6 O Z w U = O � z 5 inches dark brown TOPSOIL, loose, moist. FILL: brownish -gray silty SAND with gravel, brick, asphaltic concrete, and concrete, paint cans, loose to medium dense, damp. (SM) • Becomes dark gray to black. Test pit terminated at 15 feet. No groundwater encountered. Logged by: DKW Date: 11/02/00 Depth (ft.) 0 -- 10 15 Terra Associates, Inc. Geotechnical Consultants Test Pit No. TP -7 Soil Description Proj. No. T -4800 Approximate Elev. 104 Moisture Content TEST PIT LOGS OPUS PARK 5/405 TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Date SEPT 2001 Figure A -5 5 L107 U T C. 2 . 1 11'W► 0 Gush G. Goldsmith de Associates, loc. Consulting Eosioeers• Sutvcrors • Mutts 1111 11111 A 1.11nu. M m1.1111 10II61.,, IA 11111 TIL: 11 111.1111 PAZ:( III 111.1111 M..w Gv I.e.w.1 t•1.. M.' w.rl IlpRpl P'R Y pTATE N �1LL'AY Ib 1,__ „ i.R :. 1 ?1 r6���ir, + .3 A CTr•° 0 �1 cci � r 1 �f 4 �i r M 4�1G��': -�•• t')C � ll�J. 1 t' + * Z� I q7/�� �' �� 'Y•' ��., ••N�'LRh� fi r •-• — •oi.�. -'Fpr p+Y 1 L _ _ loci taC(Ez CIYI t tNr/ • MOO fw0„D[NUt.fo 1,KE1 N1�rt�AriA�'i - --I _I KV hIST AVE pour+ 1 M. 11•11, 61,1411 AO AO rnrwl: +n 1.1 tat OMM -l illlt FM 4 Cl2.3 Pt 01140 COUNTY OPUS N.M. L.L.C. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR OPUS N.W. L.L.0 MASH INOTON c4 11n.10 n• idgee n vn!„rl r NGI, L -1 Z {_- Z CL W 6 JU 00 CO D W W I F•- W 0 LL Q a W ZF- Z O W U � N D I- W L W 7Z 0 r O ,. W U= O ~ Z A , • .,•, • ' i....4 :•s1 ii• 'IN :i ..• •z • 4, — ,. ,T.• . a- -, il{= , -1, 1 : , ,.. •,'• • z. r. pi, \ - vAii. irl MO .. i cl S i. . • t..,, ..I„ .1 ,••• , *u. i'.' 3 - • t " , cc.. • , i 1:4 WETLANDS " - \- 411 a• 1.7 nIOJEGT DMA ti■om ..••• 1•110111•41,1rulnl e MD•AMNI O WAI ZCM... o.c. (Or eilSOND AADA tIQP» LEVDI. C•D • 31 400 LIM. 110 • 1400 LEvti. TI • 1.00 tOTAL • .600 ▪ A0.00 let0P•DIT 4fAIM • Wee • ..,•• 1•01•043 MINDED. •r% ▪ MCIMI■ IS .._.....__ , 114 E 1 - . • • • syietty • • • •••••4e••••elit'-= " : 0:: 1 • • ■••••46,•••- 4 1AA ) - - * 1 4 .. )4.3:t+t .., ' _ — ----- -- 7 . to te....445. • . • ..e. .... . - ----- - - - , 1 • 4 •4 I P. - - - . - - - - - - \ \ r" --- -.4 - -- -- ------1 , W ETLANDS .9J11 b rri " ril " 1 '1 : 1 •'• - 04. te I — I I.• ) %.• \s 1 '4+ 4+ ! .4 v ■ I • 0:4 0 - fre . VA- le• 4•4:4t.' & ....44. Se* • •44 1,,,:•:••,•:•,... 66# "-V 5Ist AVENUE SOUTH a'Agne.LITE FLAN 5CAE. I' • 30 0 Vb 30' 60' 7 5 / 50' NORT OM z.o FRELIMINARy BITE rt.AN .1015 MO. faroe.• ORAI. 111.0 CIACKED• .0. DOS. MILO F'I.01 11 Z J 0 0 U) 0 V) Ill LII J w 0 2 < ci u z - F-0 z LU UJ 0 O 52 O I— L11 u j LI: 0 z 1 - 1 - 1 U) — 1-: 0 This sketch is provided, without charge, for your information. It is not intended to show all matters related to the property including, but not limited to, area, dimensions, easements, en- croachments, or location of boundaries. It is not a part of, nor does it modify, the commitment or policy to which it is attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any matter related to this . sketch. References should be made to an accurate survey for further information. 1 NOTICE: IF THE DOCUMENT IN THIS FRAME IS LESS CLEAR THAN THIS NOTICE IT IS DUE TO THE QUALITY OF THE DOCUMENT.