The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit L04-033 - FOSTER RIDGE DEVELOPMENT - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENTFOSTER RIDGE 46th Av S Btw S. 139th & S. 140th L04 -033 July 29, 2004 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Dear Mr. Friel: City of Tukwila NOTICE OF DECISION RE: Foster Ridge Development L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -034 Administrative Planned Residential Development Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The Short Subdivision Committee has completed review of your boundary line adjustment and administrative planned residential development applications and determined that they comply with all applicable City code requirements. The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions. An addendum to that determination was issued on June 18, 2004 to address the change from a 12 lot to a 6 lot plan. This letter serves as the Notice of Decision per TMC 18.104.170. Based on the latest project submittal, preliminary approval is granted subject to the conditions stated below. There are three basic steps in the approval process: 1. Preliminary Approval This letter constitutes your preliminary approval. The application was reviewed by the Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee and approved with conditions. The conditions imposed are to ensure the boundary line adjustment is consistent with the Criteria for Preliminary Approval listed at TMC 17.08.030 C in the Tukwila Subdivision Code. Page 1 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Utilities Access Fire Protection g. Geotechnical PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CONDITIONS a. Drainage design for the site shall be reviewed as part of the PW infrastructure permit and shall meet City of Tukwila Surface Water Ordinance Requirements. b. Pursuant to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities shall be placed underground. c. Extension of the sewer and water lines to the lots shall be approved by the appropriate utility and conform to the PACE Composite Utility Plan dated July 2003. As -built plans shall be provided to the Public Works Department prior to final approval. d. Identify the location of the point of connection to the existing storm drainage pipe. If the point of connection is off site on lots 10 and/or 11 agreements must be made with the property owners to permit construction activity. e. Access roads built to Public Works and Fire Department standards must be provided to all lots as shown on the Site Plan prepared by Pace Engineering dated July 2003. This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. f. Your submittal for a Public Works permit to construct the access roads and install the utilities must contain a grading plan that shows the location of all proposed retaining walls and gives estimated cut and fill quantities. Certain retaining walls may require separate building permits and structural review. Please contact the Public Works Department for additional information. There must be a fire hydrant within 250 feet of all building sites. If the fire hydrant is not capable of a 1000 gallon per minute flow the future houses will be required to provide interior sprinlders, to be approved by the Fire Department. This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. h. The property owners will need to sign, notarize and record the revised geotechnical covenant as a condition of the PW Type C infrastructure construction permit. The permit will not be finaled until the covenant has been recorded. i. The recommendation from Associated Earth Sciences, contained in their July 11, 2002 letter, that there be an on -site inspector representing the geotechnical engineers during the L97 -0026 Page 2 General J• P. construction of foundations, retaining walls, water, sewer, and surface water utilities, and driveways shall be a condition of the Public Works permit. The on -site inspector shall verify in writing, on a daily basis, with the reports sent to the City's Department of Public Works, that all construction work has been performed in accordance with approved plans and specifications, permit requirements, and that the construction work complies with all of the geotechnical's recommendations. The plantings specified in the wetland mitigation/buffer enhancement plan prepared by Sheldon & Associates for the reduction of the wetland buffer from 50' to 25' along Lot 2 must be installed prior to final short plat approval. Blackberry control should begin immediately to match the seasonal recommendations in the report. k. The plantings along the north side of the detention vault must be shown on the land altering permit and installed prior to final short plat approval. 1. Submit a tree permit showing all regulated trees to be removed by species and diameter and the location and species of replacement trees per the table in the Tree Ordinance. All trees to be retained within the clearing limits must be flagged and have tree protection measures in place prior to the start of work on the PW permit. m. The edges of the wetland buffer easements on lots 2, 3, 4 and 6 shall be delineated with a split rail fence and signage per TMC 18.45.060 6. n. You will need to obtain all required permits prior to beginning any construction. For water and sewer permits, contact the individual provider District. For City of Tukwila utilities, site grading, and access driveways contact Tukwila Public Works at (206) 433 -0179. o. Install all required site improvements, including those proposed in the application and those identified above as conditions of approval. Submit a set of recording documents in either legal or record of survey format that meet the King County Recorder's requirements and contain the following items: 1. A survey map as described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of approval. The surveyor's original signature must be on the face of the plat. 2. Existing and proposed legal descriptions for all lots. 3. Legal description of the access /utility easements. 4. Joint Maintenance Agreements for the easements, drainage system and open space tract. L97 -0026 Page 3 5. Legal description of the wetland buffer easement across lots 3, 4 and 6. APPEALS This BLA approval decision is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the BLA is permitted. Any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS may raise such issues as part of the appeal . If no valid appeals are filed within the time limit the decision of the Department will be fmal. In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (8/20/04). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors in the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. 2. Final Approval The next step is to install the required site improvements, comply with the conditions of approval and submit the necessary documents (survey, legal descriptions, and other required paper work). After the documents have been found to be in order, and the all of the requirements of the BLA have been met, the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee signs your paperwork which constitutes a grant of fmal approval. No permits for the construction of houses on the site will be granted prior to the recording of the BLA. L97 -0026 Page 4 Expiration 3. Recording Sincerely, All taxes and fees assessed against the property must be current prior to final approval. Please check with the King County Assessor's Office and the City of Tukwila Finance Department prior to submitting final mylars. The final approved documents must be filed with the King County Department of Records by July 27, 2005, one year from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. The City may grant a single six month extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration date. The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your application is ready for recording. It is your responsibility to record the City approved documents with the King County Department of Records. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original drawings to King County, see the Recording Procedures handout. The BLA is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 -6 weeks, at which time your BLA is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand- delivering a copy of the recorded document to the project planner. Steve Lancaster Chair, Short Subdivision Committee cc: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director (please initial your approval) Nick Olivas, Fire Chief (please initial your approval) King County Assessor, Accounting Division Department of Ecology, SEPA Division William Looney Benito Cervantes Jon Beahm Cyril Mork L97 -0026 Page 5 Geo Tech Report and Wetland Reports are in L04 -034 Description of Addendum: Description of Original Proposal: City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) ADDENDUM The project has been revised to reduce the number of buildable lots from 12 to 6 due to geotechnical and stormwater constraints on the site. The remainder of the site will be an unbuildable sensitive area tract. The 6 lots will be clustered at the southwest corner of the site and access will be provided from existing street ends at S. 139 and S. 140 Streets. Steve Lancaster, Director The original project involved a replat of a 2.9 acre site zoned for single family residential use from 18 lots to 12 lots. The reduction in number of lots was due to the presence of a wetland and unbuildable slopes on site. An administrative planned residential development process would be used to reduce lot sizes and setbacks in exchange for setting aside the sensitive areas of the site through an open space tract and native growth protection areas. The original MDNS was issued with the condition that the project be subject to a geotechnical peer review and comply with all of the findings of that review. Proponent: John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Location of Proposal: Northeast comer of the intersection of South 140th Street and 46th Avenue Lead Agency: City Of Tukwila File Number: E97 -0013 The City has determined that the addendum does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The original DNS was issued March 5, 1999. This addendum is adopted on June 18, 2004. Jack P. -, Deputy Director for the City of Tukwila, Washington 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Nora Gierloff - Foster Ridge Lot Consolie - +ion Page 1 From: Nora Gierloff To: Keitholsen23 @yahoo.com Date: 6/9/06 2:37PM Subject: Foster Ridge Lot Consolidation Hi Keith, It looks like the lot consolidation L04 -033 is ready for final approval. The owners need to sign and notarize an original and the surveyor needs to sign the surveyor's certificate. I have a copy you can pick up here, or they can just run another copy. Please do not fold this, the Recorder's office has been rejecting any documents that have been folded. Also make sure not to put any marks or staples in the margins. Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila DCD (206) 433 -7141 May 5, 2006 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 RE: Foster Ridge Development L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation Dear Mr. Friel: This is a reminder that the expiration date on your boundary line adjustment/lot consolidation is coming up. This was originally approved on July 29, 2004 to go from 12 lots to 6 lots. This must be revised to result in one lot that will be the starting point for short plat L04 -085. We have issued one extension and no other extensions are possible. In the short plat preliminary approval letter I noted that this change to the BLA was still outstanding. You received redlined drawings last November showing the changes that need to be made. Revisions must be submitted, approved and recorded prior to the expiration date of July 27, 2006. If this application expires due to your non - submittal of requested documents you will be required to submit a new lot consolidation to form the basis for the short plat. Sincerely Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor Cc: Richard Pedersen NG Q:\FOST City of Tukwila ila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director Page 1 of 1 05/05/2006 2:40:00 PM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 June 2, 2005 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Dear Mr. Friel: Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor NG Q:IFOST_RDGIBLAExp.doc City of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Foster Ridge Development L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation This is a reminder that the expiration date on your boundary line adjustment/lot consolidation is coming up. This was originally approved on July 29, 2004 to go from 12 lots to 6 lots. This must be revised to result in one lot that will be the starting point for short plat L04 -085. In the short plat preliminary approval letter I noted that this change to the BLA was still outstanding. If this application expires due to your non - submittal of requested documents by July 27, 2005 you will be required to submit a new lot consolidation to form the basis for the short plat. Pa_e 1 of 1 06/01/2005 1 1:21 AM 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 January 14, 2005 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 RE: L04 -085 Short Plat L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development E97 -0013 Environmental Review Dear Mr. Friel: Your application for a short plat located at South 139th Street and 46th Avenue South has been found to be complete on January 14, 2005 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements and vesting under Tukwila's previous Sensitive Areas Ordinance. You must still submit a revision to your existing boundary line adjustment permit to change it from a consolidation of 18 lots to 1, rather than the 6 you had previously proposed. Your SEPA and planned residential development permits will transfer and apply to the new short plat application. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, please call me. Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed I will post it with a laminated copy of the Notice of Application and the comment period will start. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. Sincerel Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 FROM : John B. Friel, PE PLS For Richard S. Pederson Foster Ridge FAX NO. : December 14, 2004 MEMO TO: Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor City of Tukwila FAX 206- 431 -3665 FROM: John B. Friel, PE PLS FAX 425 - 673 -7674 '-c. 14 2004 07:39PM P1 REF. Foster Ridge I am in receipt of yen& letter of December 14, 2004.1 have kept Dick Pederson appraised - of our earlier . conversations and we had a meeting on this subject earlier this week with Doug Purcell, Mr Pedersons attorney. Doug Purcell has discussed these options with Shelley Kerslake, the City Attorney and also with Dick Pederson. They are advising me to go with your short plat option. I will do-everything that 1 am capable of in terms of surveying and Map work for the short plat I do not have direct access to the internet. It would be helpful to me if you would fax me a copy ofthe. current short plat application packet with item requirements and information: Due to the very limited time available, Doug has also suggested that at an early point in this process that perhaps we should get together and briefly go over all of the application requirements' with you so that we can do our best to get a complete application. We cannot afford to fail in this.regard. December 14, 2004 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Dear Mr. Friel: City of Tukwila RE: L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development E97 -0013 Environmental Review Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director I am writing to you regarding your application for a boundary line adjustment and planned residential development located at South 139th Street and 46th Avenue South. I am sorry that you chose not to discuss the project with me when I called on the 10 or attend the scheduled meeting today with City of Tukwila staff. Our intention was to explain the implications on your project of the new Sensitive Areas Ordinance (SAO) that the Council adopted last night. The Wetland Delineation and Functional Values Assessment performed in November 1995 identified the large wetland on the property as falling into Tukwila's Type 2 Classification. The new SAO contains slightly different criteria, and given the length of time that has passed you should ask your consultant to update the Assessment and confirm the wetland type under the new Code. If, as is likely, it is a Type 2 wetland under the new SAO the buffer will increase from 50 to 80 feet. Please see the attached diagram to see where the increased buffer will fall on lots 2, 3, 4, and 6. The advice of our City Attorney is that while the infrastructure required in the Preliminary Approval letter (roads, utilities and storm drainage) is vested under the old ordinance requirements, building permit applications for houses on the lots would be required to conform to the codes in effect at the time they were declared complete. In other words, you would be required to meet the buffer and setback requirements of the new SAO. Since the new buffer and building setback covers most of the developable area on lots 3, 4 and 6 there would not be enough area on each lot to construct the proposed houses. One option would be to apply for a reasonable use exception under TMC 18.45.180 B. This would involve a public hearing in front of the Planning Commission and possibly additional conditions on the development. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 The other option that we wanted to present and discuss with you was the possibility of replacing your boundary line adjustment (BLA) application with a short plat. Unlike a BLA, the lots created through a short plat are vested under Washington State law to the regulations in effect at the time the short plat application is complete. If you were able to submit complete lot consolidation and short plat applications before the effective date of the new SAO (by 5:00 PM, December 21 you could vest under the old SAO and retain your prior approval. These applications are available on- line at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us. I hope that you understand your options and are conveying this information to your client. Until you are willing to talk with us we are unable to provide any additional assistance. Please let me know how you plan on addressing this issue. Sincerely, Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor cc: Joanna Spencer, Public Works Jim Morrow, Public Works Jack Pace, DCD Shelley Kerslake, City Attorney October 1, 2004 Mr. John B. Friel, P.E., PLS P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Dear Mr. Friel: City of Tukwlla Department of Public Works James E Morrow, P.E., Director Subject: Foster Ridge Site Address — South 139 Street & 46 Ave. South Parcel Nos. 322929 -0090, 0100, 0110, 0120, 0130, 0140, 0150, 0160, 0170, 0180, 0190, 0200, 0210, 0220, 0230, 0240, 0250, and 0260 Permit No. PW03 -106 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor This letter is to follow up on our phone conversation of Tuesday, September 21, 2004. As we discussed, the PACE plan, TIR, and other information submitted to date is complete for Public Works, except for the resolution of the downstream storm drainage system from the proposed private storm vault. The following two options are available to you, with regard to resolving the drainage issue: Option #1 - (1) Current plan by PACE can be approved by Public Works, which includes the storm drainage plan. (2) Provide Private Temporary Easement for construction of storm pipe (or) Private Permanent Easement with or without a Maintenance Agreement provision. This easement will be between the Owner of Foster Ridge and the adjacent property owner, Mr. Greg Hittle. I spoke with Mr. Hittle, Owner of TL No. 322920 -0047, on Tuesday the 21" of this month. His property has an 18 -inch storm drainage pipe along the NW property line, which was installed in approximately 1991. Mr. Hittle said that he thinks this storm drainage pipe is approximately thirty (30) feet to the NW, from your adjoining properties. His phone number is (253) 925 -1677. Option #2 — (1) Revise storm drainage plan to show previously submitted drainage system. (2) Storm drainage report is accepted by Public Works; however, the City has identified erosion and capacity problems downstream which must be corrected by the applicant. The Applicant's Engineer shall coordinate with the City to identify all public and private problem areas and fix these problems. (3) This previously proposed storm drainage system, would require a Private Easement from the Owner of TL No. 734750 -0405. Your letter dated December 4, 2001, stated that this ten (10) foot wide Private Easement would be granted by Mr. Benito Cervantes. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Mr. John B. Friel, P.E., PLS Page 2 October 1, 2004 Applicant shall submit a Private Maintenance Agreement for any common infrastructure (storm drainage, access roads, etc.) shared by newly created Tots. Provide a copy to the City of all private ingrees, egress and utility easements. Provide a copy to the City of any private storm water maintenance agreements. I have prepared (1) a Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement, and (2) a Hold Harmless Agreement for work within the public right -of -way for the Owners' signature with Notary. If you have any questions, please contact me at (206) 431 -2448. Sincerely, David H. McPherson Development Engineer DHM:ad cc: Jim Morrow, P.E., Public Works Director Jspnna Spencer, Development Engineer ora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor file (P:elice \Letter to Friel) DATE: September 20, 2004 PROJECT NAME: Foster Ridge BLA PLAN CHECK NO.: PW03 -106 Q:\FOST RDG\PW03- 106.DOC PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Plan Reviewer: Contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. Please revise your drawings to address the conditions in the Notice of Decision preliminary approval letter. Specifically: 1. The property owners will need to sign, notarize and record the revised geotechnical covenant as a condition of the PW Type C infrastructure construction permit. The permit will not be finaled until the covenant has been recorded. 2. Add a note to the drawings that there must be an on -site inspector representing the geotechnical engineers during the construction of foundations, retaining walls, water, sewer, and surface water utilities, and driveways. The on -site inspector shall verify in writing, on a daily basis, with the reports sent to the City's Department of Public Works, that all construction work has been performed in accordance with approved plans and specifications, permit requirements, and that the construction work complies with all of the geotechnical's recommendations. 3. The wetland mitigation/buffer enhancement plan prepared by Sheldon & Associates along Lot 2 must be included in the PW permit submittal and installed prior to final approval. 4. The type, quantity and size of plantings along the north side of the detention vault must be shown on the land altering permit and installed prior to final approval. 5. Submit a tree permit showing all regulated trees to be removed by species and diameter and the location and species of replacement trees per the table in the Tree Ordinance. The PW permit must identify all trees to be retained within the clearing limits and they must be flagged and have tree protection measures in place prior to the start of work. 6. The edges of the wetland buffer easements on lots 2, 3, 4 and 6 shall be delineated with a split rail fence and signage per TMC 18.45.060 6. CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION Richard Pedersen has filed applications for development of a 6 lot planned residential development and boundary line adjustment to be located at the northeast comer of South 140th Street and 46th Avenue South. Permits applied for include: L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development Other known required permits include: Tree Permit Studies required with the applications include: Geotechnical Report Wetland Delineation A SEPA MDNS was issued 3/5/1999 and an addendum was issued 6/18/2004. FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: Application Filed: June 1, 2004 Notice of Completeness Issued: June 7, 2004 Notice of Application Issued: June 22, 2004 L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development E97 -0013 Environmental Review OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., July 6, 2004. You may request a copy of any decision and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The boundary line adjustment, planned residential development and SEPA threshold determination are appealable to the Hearing Examiner. For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100, Monday - Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. June 8, 2004 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION RE: L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development E97 -0013 Environmental Review Dear Mr. Friel: Your application for a boundary line adjustment and planned residential development located at South 139th Street and 46th Avenue South has been found to be complete on June 7, 2004 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, please call me. Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed I will post it with a laminated copy of the Notice of Application and the comment period will start. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor cc: Joanna Spencer, Public Works Don Tomaso, Fire Department Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 FROM 59)( 722: Rata of Wasbingtoa Comity of King City qf Tukwila bov FAX NO. : Akfr4 a/eAlpley4 2.04 - 4.31- UT y OF TUKWILA Deparbustt OfujDece1ipiimt 6300 Saansernirriadseard, Tukwila- WA salsa Tekpierz (206) 4114610 FAX (206) 45 Ewa& juin:Planed. takwilammis AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OP PUBUC INFORMATION SIGN(S) dem/A/ 5 . .-/vez_ (riahrr MAIM) understa.nd that SeCtIOA "3.1041110 of the • Tukwila Municipal Code requires to post the property no later than fourteen (14) day5 following the issue/ice of the Notice of Completeness. 14kie I certify tun ai .11754116: 1_ the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 11104.110 apd the ether applicable guidelines were potted on the property located at 5 i3 r'J5t f - 4 Ave 5, ao as to be clearly seen from each .fighnof-way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number '- 0 -4:!” 4.-Le44— o3z- 1 herewith authorize the City of Tukwila or ifs repreaentsdive to remove and immediately dispose dew sign at the property owners expense, tf not removed in a timely manner or within fourteen (14) days of a Notice lever. „ rplicant or Proj2ct Manager's Signature On this day personally appeared before trio < /An i. Frie CO Ele InTWT t to be the Individual sato executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that Gaels signed the rams *Ohba voluntary eCt and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned &areal. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before tne tide a day ef JUnc.- ..°C Tun. 22 2004 10:36AM P1 SUE A MOODY NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF WASHINGTON COMMISS.ON EXPIRES AUGUST 1. 2005 OT PUBLIC in and for the A of Washington residing at /VW/ nJed My conunission mcpirse Rk-/-45 Penhailegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. Engineering Planning Surveying Ms. Nora Gierloff Planning Division City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Gierloff: Kirkland 750 Sixth Street South • Kirkland, WA 98033 P. 425.827.2014 • F. 425.827.5043 May 25, 2004 Planning Division Comments JNovember 18, 2003): Public Works Department Comments (February 2, 2004): Seattle 1601 Second Avenue, Suite 1000 • Seattle WA 98101 -3511 P. 206.441.1855 • F. 206.448.7167 RECEIo E'D JUN 01 2004 DEV ELOPMENT Subject: Foster Ridge Boundary Line Adjustment Civil Plans — Tukwila, WA Response to City of Tukwila Planning & Public Works Department Comments Permit No. PW03 -106 Please find a brief response to the comments issued by City of Tukwila Planning and Public Works Department dated November 18, 2003 and February 2, 2004 respectively. Each numbered item below corresponds to the respective comment provided by the Planning and Public Works Department as applicable. The comments have been addressed by PACE as follows: 1. Trees to be removed on 20% or greater slopes or within the wetland buffer have been identified on the Site Plan (see Sheet C2). 2. Tree replacement calculations shall be provided on separate exhibit to be approved by City of Tukwila. 3. Final planting plan for replacement trees shall be shown on separate exhibit to be approved by City of Tukwila. Clearing limits have been revised to reduce the number of trees that have to be removed to incorporate the flow spreader in the storm design. 1. An NPDES permit will not be required for the project since the total area to be cleared is 0.80- acres. 2. The storm drainage design has been modified to connect to an existing 12" storm drainage pipe located between Lots 10 and 11 (13749 and 13747 Macadam Road). All runoff that is collected from onsite and offsite areas will discharge into said 12" storm pipe. 3. The design has been revised to conform to City requirements by replacing rockery walls greater than 4 -ft. in height with modular block walls to be designed by Geotechnical Ms. Nora Gierloff Foster Ridge BLA PW03 -106 May 25, 2004 Page 2 of 2 Engineer at time of construction. The rockery wall detail has been replaced with the approved City of Tukwila detail (RS -05) shown on Sheet C10. 4. Top and bottom elevations of walls /rockeries are called out on Grading Plan (see Sheet C4). Connections for wall and rockeries have been provided and are shown on Storm Plan (Sheet C5). 5. Curtain drains and level spreader remain part of design. The curtain drain's function is to minimize saturation of soils by intercepting and collecting subsurface water. The level spreader is designed to prevent concentrated water from flowing down the slope. 6. The wet season timeline has been noted on the Erosion Control Plan (Sheet C3). 7. Plans have been updated to reflect the locations of driveways at the end of South 140` Street. The Storm Drainage Plan (Sheet C5) identifies how runoff will be managed. Driveway and access road slopes are kept at less than 15 %. 8. Plans have been updated to show existing #4525 driveway, rockery, drainage under driveway and the end of pavement in South 139 Street. 9. The water quality /detention vault remains partially above ground. The Storm Drainage Plan (Sheet C5) has been revised to include planting in front of the vault to block the view from Macadam Road South as discussed with Jim Morrow at a March 25., 2004 meeting. 10. Crushed Surface Base Course (CSBC) has been called out in details No. 2 and No. 3 on Sheet C10. 12. A follow -up meeting was held March 25, 2004. 16. Geotechnical reports applicable to this project have been identified on the Grading Plan (Sheet C4). 17. The Composite Utility Plan (Sheet C11) shows existing as well as proposed water, sewer and storm utilities. Sheet C11 notes that the final location of private utilities shall be located by the utility companies. Any attempt to guess at the final location of these utilities at this point in the design would be unproductive and ineffective. Please call Phil Cheesman or myself if you have any questions or require additional information or e-mail me at peterppaceengrs.com. Sincerely, Cc: John B. Friel, P.E., JBMF Consulting Engineer P:\P98 \98673\Doc \052504 Response Letter.doc 2 Peter Paulsen Senior Engineer Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. Engineering • Planning • Surveying PENHALLEGON ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINE RS, INC April 21, 2004 Project No. KE96296A JBMF Consulting Engineer P.O. Box 27 E verett, Washington 98206 Attention: Mr. John Friel, P.E. Subject: Geotechnical Plan Review Foster Ridge Subdivision Tukwila, Washington Dear John: Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. As requested, Associated Earth Sciences Inc., (AESI) has completed a geotechnical plan review for the above project. The plans were reviewed with respect to a geotechnical study completed by AESI titled "Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazards, and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Foster Ridge, 46 Avenue South at South 139 Street, Tukwila, Washington ", dated February 13, 1997, revised ' November 13, 1998, and follow -up meetings /reviews with JBMF Consulting Engineer, Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers (PACE), and the City of Tukwila. The reviewed plans (Permit Review Drawings - April 2003) were prepared by PACE and consisted of the following sheets: C1 (dated April 2003), C,2,, C3, C4, C5, and C8 (all dated April 2004), C9 (dated July 2003), and C 10 (dated April 2004). Following are our comments and recommendations regarding the proposed plans for the project. Sheet C5 The note for the drain connection from behind the wall to the 6" PVC should say "wall drain ", not "rockery drain ". There does not appear to be a wall drain or footing drain for the water quality/detention vault. These drains should be shown. Ninety (90) lineal feet (LF) of 6" curtain drain was added along the southwest side of the project. We are uncertain as to the need for this drain but have no objection to it. The modular block wall along the west side of the property will require geogrids that extend onto the adjoining property. A temporary construction easement would be required for this type of construction. It may be necessary to use an Ultra Block wall in this location as a temporary construction easement cannot be obtained. A note should be added for the 93 LF .of '12" ,HDPE that will be the main storm drain line over the slope along the property line between Lots 10 and 11. The note should state the following: 911 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 • Kirkland, WA 98033 • Phone 425 827 -7701 • Fax 425827-5424 "Burial of the pipe must be accomplished either by hand or with minimal -sized equipment that will cause the least disturbance to the slope area. To the extent possible, the pipe should be threaded between and around trees instead of removing the trees. All disturbed areas must be immediately stabilized for erosion protection". Sheet C9 A global change is necessary to show all details, and notes, as referring to page C5, not C6. This includes the notes for the curtain drain detail and the curtain drain -storm drain common trench detail. Sheet C10 Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 should refer to page C4, not C5. Section 7 should refer to page C5, not C6. Wall and footing drains should be shown for the combined detention/WQ vault. Should you have any questions regarding this plan review, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Sincerely, ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. Kirkland, Washington Gary A. F `wers, P.G., P.E.G. Principal It ineering Geologist cc: Phil Cheesman PACE 750 Sixth Street South Kirkland, Washington. 98033 GAF /Id KE96296A8 Projects \1996296\KE\WP - W2K Bruce L. Blyton, P.E. Principal Engineer 2 • In the matter of the short plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of KING County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in said KING County, to -wit: EXCEPTIONS: SEE SCHEDULE B ATTACHED CHARGE: $200.00 TAX: 17.60 Records examined to April 26, 2 0 04 B y , HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPS 3400 COLUMBIA CENTER, 701 5TH AVE SEATTLE, WA 98104 SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE Certificate for Filing Proposed Short Plat SEE SCHEDULE A (NEXT PAGE) at 8:00 A.M. VESTED IN: RICHARD S. PEDERSEN AND DONNA M. PEDERSEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY n HARRIS /EISENBREY Title Officer (206)628 -5623 Order No.: 1134229 SHPIATA /12- 5 -90 /EK HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP? SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE A (Continued) LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1134229 THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 °56'42.5" EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT, 270 FEET; THENCE NORTH 57 °41'12.5" EAST 362.11 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGIN OF COUNTY ROAD (MACADAM ROAD SOUTH); THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY MARGINAL LINE OF SAID ROAD 12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57 °41'12.5" WEST 100.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 °08'30" WEST 156.39 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 °28' WEST 244.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35 °34' WEST 140.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54° WEST 65.07 FEET TO INTERSECT A LINE 30 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 89 °19'15" WEST TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (BEING KNOWN AS LOTS 17 THROUGH 27, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 THROUGH 7, BLOCK 2, HELLWIG'S ADDITION TO FOSTER, ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH VACATED STREETS ADJOINING) CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B This certificate does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following exceptions: GENERAL EXCEPTIONS: Order No.: 1134229 A. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. B. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. C. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, and any other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey and inspection of the premises. D. Easements or claims of easements not shown by the public records. E. Any lien, or right to lien, for contributions to employee benefit funds, or for state workers' compensation, or for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, all as imposed by law, and not shown by the public records. F. Liens under the Workmen's Compensation Act not shown by the public records. G. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity or garbage removal. H. General taxes not now payable; matters relating to special assessments and special levies, if any, preceding or in the same becoming a lien. I. Reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; Indian tribal codes or regulations, Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including easements or equitable servitudes. J. Water rights, claims, or title to water. K. THIS REPORT IS ISSUED AND ACCEPTED UPON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY SHALL NOT EXCEED ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS($1000.00). CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHPLATB /031694 /soc - IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS A 1. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Order No.: 1134229 GRANTEE: VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT PURPOSE: SEWER PIPELINE AND LINES AND ALL NECESSARY CONNECTIONS AND APPURTENANCES THERETO AREA AFFECTED: A WESTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES RECORDED: MAY 16, 1978 RECORDING NUMBER: 7805161076 2. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES FOR ALL LOTS IN SAID PREMISES OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2003 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: SEE BELOW LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 186,000.00 (AGGREGATE) ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: 3. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES FOR ALL LOTS IN SAID PREMISES OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2004 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS: BLOCK 1: LOT 17 -- 322920 - 0090 -06; LOT 18 -- 322920 - 0110 -02; LOT 19 -- 322920 - 0120 - 00; LOT 20 -- 322920 - 0130 - 08; LOT 21 -- 322920 - 0140 -06; LOT 22 -- 322920 - 0150 -03; LOT 23 -- 322920 - 0160 -01; LOT 24 -- 322920 - 0170 -09; LOT 25 -- 322920 - 0180 -07; LOT 26 -- 322920 - 0190 -05; LOT 27 -- 322920 - 0200 -03; BLOCK 2: LOT 1 -- 322920 - 0100 -04; LOT 2 -- 322920 - 0210 -01; LOT 3 -- 322920 - 0220 -09; LOT 4 -- 322920 - 0230 -07; LOT 5 -- 322920 - 0240 -05; LOT 6 -- 322920 - 0250 -02; LOT 7 -- 322920 - 0260 -00 BILLED: $2,260.35 (AGGREGATE) PAID: $1,277.64 (AGGREGATE) UNPAID: $1,277.46 (AGGREGATE) EACH LOT IS TOGETHER WITH PORTION OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/ SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: SEE BELOW LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 186,000.00 (AGGREGATE) ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 BILLED: $2,613.63 (AGGREGATE) PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $2,613.63 (AGGREGATE) TAX ACCOUNT NUMBERS: BLOCK 1: LOT 17 -- 322920 - 0090 -06; LOT 18 -- 322920 - 0110 -02; LOT 19 -- 322920 - 0120 -00; LOT 20 -- 322920 - 0130 -08; LOT 21 -- 322920 - 0140 -06; LOT 22 -- 322920 - 0150 -03; LOT 23 -- 322920 - 0160 -01; LOT 24 -- 322920 - 0170 -09; LOT 25 -- 322920- 0180 -07; LOT 26 -- 322920 - 0190 -05; LOT 27 -- 322920 - 0200 -03; BLOCK 2: LOT 1 -- 322920 - 0100 -04; LOT 2 -- 322920 - 0210 -01; LOT 3 -- 322920 - 0220 -09; LOT 4 -- 322920- 0230 -07; LOT 5 -- 322920 - 0240 -05; LOT 6 -- 322920- 0250 -02; LOT 7 -- 322920 - 0260 -00 EACH LOT IS TOGETHER WITH PORTION OF VACATED STREET ADJOINING 4. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2001 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322920- 0010 -03 LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 17,500.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: BILLED: $ 251.91 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 251.91 AFFECTS: LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS UNDER THIS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER INCLUDED AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES, BEING A STRIP OF LAND APPROXIAMTELY 12' BY 100.81'. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Order No.: 1134229 SHPIATB3 / 12- 12 -90 /EK w GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: HICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/ C SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1134229 NOTE: IF SAID DELINQUENCIES ARE NOT PAID PRIOR TO MAY 1ST ON THE THIRD YEAR FOLLOWING THE TAX YEAR THEN AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT MAY BE DUE TO REMOVE SAID TAXES FROM FORECLOSURE. 5. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2002 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322920- 0010 -03 LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 24,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 325.75 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 325.75 AFFECTS: LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING STREET ADJOINING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS UNDER THIS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER INCLUDES AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES, BEING A STRIP OF LAND APPROXIAMTELY 12' BY 100.81'. F 6. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR: 2003 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322920- 0010 -03 LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 25,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 334.20 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 334.20 AFFECTS: LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING ADJOINING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS UNDER THIS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER INCLUDES AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES, BEING A STRIP OF LAND APPROXIAMTELY 12' BY 100.81'. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHPLATB3/ 12- 12 -90/ EK GENERAL & SPECIAL TAXES: IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP' SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS • 7. GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES AND CHARGES, PAYABLE FEBRUARY 15, DELINQUENT IF FIRST HALF UNPAID ON MAY 1, SECOND HALF DELINQUENT IF UNPAID ON NOVEMBER 1 OF THE TAX YEAR (AMOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE INTEREST AND PENALTIES): YEAR 2004 TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER: 322920 - 0010 -03 LEVY CODE: 2413 ASSESSED VALUE -LAND: $ 26,000.00 ASSESSED VALUE- IMPROVEMENTS: $ 0.00 BILLED: $ 355.49 PAID: $ 0.00 UNPAID: $ 355.49 Order No.: 1134229 NOTE: IF THE TAX AMOUNT IS NOT EVENLY DIVISIBLE INTO TWO PAYMENTS, KING COUNTY WILL REQUIRE THE HALF PAYMENT BE ROUNDED UP TO THE NEXT CENT. FAILURE TO ROUND UP THE HALF PAYMENT MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE TAX PAYMENT BY THE COUNTY. AFFECTS: LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING ADJOINING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS UNDER THIS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER INCLUDES AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES, BEING A STRIP OF LAND APPROXIAMTELY 12' BY 100.81'. • 8. LIABILITY TO ASSESSMENTS FOR GENERAL TAXES FOR CURRENT AND /OR PRIOR YEARS. SAID PROPERTY IS NOT PRESENTLY CARRIED OR BEING TAXED ON THE GENERAL TAX ROLLS. s AFFECTS: THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF SAID PREMISES (FORMERLY KNOWN AS S. 140TH ST) . WE NOTE THE KING COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S MAP DOES NOT SHOW THIS 30 FEET AS BEING CONNECTED TO THE LOTS IN BLOCK 2 OF SAID UNRECORDED PLAT. NOR DO THE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLL APPEAR TO INCLUDE SAID 30 FEET. • 9. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF AIA INTERNATIONAL VENTURES, PRESUMED BY THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS TO HAVE AN INTEREST IN SAID PREMISES. nt AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES (APPROXIMATELY 12' BY CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SH PLATB3/ 12- 12 -90/ EK 100.81')ADJOING LOT 1 BLOCK 1. x 10. RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST OF MOHAMMAD A. KHAN, A SINGLE MAN, GRANTEE ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: GRANTOR: IICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP) SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Order No.: 1134229 OCTOBER 19, 2001 20011019002259 AIA INTERNATIONAL VENTURES, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ON THE DATE OF SAID INSTRUMENT THE GRANTOR HELD NO RECORD INTEREST IN SAID PROPERTY AND HAS SINCE ACQUIRED NO RECORD INTEREST. AFFECTS: AFFECTS: LOT 1 OF BLOCK 1 OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT, TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING ADJOINING THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS UNDER THIS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER INCLUDES AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES, BEING A STRIP OF LAND APPROXIAMTELY 12' BY 100.81'. WE NOTE THE DEED INTO DARREL D. CLARK FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT OF HELLWIG'S ADDITION, RECORDED APRIL 6, 1942 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 3231844, DOES NOT INCLUDE THE VACATED ALLEY /STREET ADJOINING. HOWEVER WHEN THE ESTATE OF MABLE CLARK, DECEASED, CONVEYED SAID PREMISES BY STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2001201000799, SAID DEED INCLUDED TOGETHER WITH VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING, AND WHICH WAS FURTHER CONVEYED TO MOHAMMAD A. KHAN, BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20011019002259, AS NOTED IN PARAGRAPH 10 ABOVE. 11. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: LOAN NUMBER: CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY MOHAMMAD A. KHAN, A SINGLE MAN NOT AVAILABLE NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE CO. $ 202,500.00 OCTOBER 17, 2001 OCTOBER 19, 2001 20011019002260 NOT DISCLOSED THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. S H P LAT B3 / 12 -12 -90 / EK v GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NUMBER: LOAN NUMBER: 3ICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMP/ ' SHORT PLAT CERTIFICATE SCHEDULE B (Continued) EXCEPTIONS Q AFFECTS: AN EASTERLY PORTION OF SAID PREMISES (APPROXIMATELY 12' BY 100.81') AND OTHER PROPERTY. • 12. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Order No.: 1134229 ROBERT G. MCCAUSLAND AND ANGELA K. MCCAUSLAND, HUSBAND AND WIFE LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY EDMUND DAVIS AND GLADYS E. DAVIS, HUSBAND AND WIFE, WHO ACQUIRED TITLE AS GLADYS E. LINDE, AS HER SEPARATE ESTATE $ 44,800.00 4 17, 1991 APRIL 23, 1991 9104230495 THE AMOUNT NOW SECURED BY SAID DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS UPON WHICH THE SAME CAN BE DISCHARGED OR ASSUMED SHOULD BE ASCERTAINED FROM THE HOLDER OF THE INDEBTEDNESS SECURED. • 13. THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN THIS COMMITMENT IS BASED ON INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION AND THE PUBLIC RECORDS AS DEFINED IN THE POLICY TO ISSUE. THE PARTIES TO THE FORTHCOMING TRANSACTION MUST NOTIFY THE TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIOR TO CLOSING IF THE DESCRIPTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THEIR EXPECTATIONS. NOTE 1: THE FOLLOWING MAY BE USED AS AN ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON THE DOCUMENTS TO BE RECORDED TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RCW 64.04. SAID ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR A COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION WHICH MUST ALSO APPEAR IN THE BODY OF THE DOCUMENT: LOTS 17 -27, BLOCK 1, LOTS 1 -7, BLOCK 2, HELLWIGS ADDITION TO FOSTER UNRECORDED. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHPIATB3/ 12- 12 -90 /EK CHICAGO TITI LNSURANCE COMPANY 701 FIFTH AVENUE, #3400, SEATTLE, WA 98104 PHONE: (206)628 -5600 FAX: (206)623 -7463 IMPORTANT: This is not a Survey. It is furnished as a convenience to locate the land indicated hereon with reference to streets and other land. No liability is assumed by reason of reliance hereon. MAP/RDA/ FOSTER RIDGE 6 LOT BLA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LIST RICHARD S. PEDERSEN - OWNER LOT #BLK #PLAT 17 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 18 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 19 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 20 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 21 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 22 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 23 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 24 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 25 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 26 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 27 1 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 1 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 2 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 3 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 4 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 5 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 6 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ 7 2 HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC, TGW POR OF VAC ST ADJ TAX ACC # 322920 - 0090 -06 322920 - 0110 -02 322920 - 0120 -00 322920 - 0130 -08 322920 - 0140 -06 322920 - 0150 -03 322920 - 0160 -01 322920 - 0170 -09 322920 - 0180 -07 322920 - 0190 -05 322920 - 0200 -03 322920 - 0100 -04 322920 - 0210 -01 322920 - 0220 -09 322920 - 0230 -07 322920 - 0240 -05 322920 - 0250 -02 322920 - 0260 -00 VIEW OF FOSTER RIDGE SITE, UPSLOPE FROM AREA NEAR LOT 5 OF HELLWIG ADD. VIEW OF ;FOSTER RIDGE SITE, UPSLOPE - FROM ..OFFSITE `A EA 2 ONG MACADAM VIEW LOOKING SOUTHWESTERLY @ FOSTER RIDGE SITE UPSLOPE FROM AREA NEAR LOT 10 HELLWIG ADDITION -,.ON TO LEFT VIEW OF ABOVE AREA FROM SAME LOCATION February 12, 2004 John Eriel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Sincerely, t L e Werle Permit Technician enclosures City of Tukwila Department of Public Works James E Morrow, P.E., Director SUBJECT: CORRECTION LETTER #1 Public Works Permit Application Number PW03 -106 Foster Ridge Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Dear Mr. Eriel: This letter is to inform you of corrections that must be addressed before your permit can be approved. Joanna Spencer, Development Engineer with Public Works, Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor, with the Planning Department, and Ken Nelson, Senior Plans Examiner, with the Building Department, have reviewed your application and have attached comments and /or corrections. The City requires that four (4) complete sets of revised plans be resubmitted with the appropriate revision block. If your review does not require revised plans, but requires additional reports or other documentation, please submit four (4) copies of each document. In order to expedite your application, a Revision Sheet must accompany every resubmittal. I have enclosed one for your convenience. Revisions must be made in person and will not be accepted through the mail or by a messenger service. If you have any questions, please contact me at the City of Tukwila Public Works Department at (206) 433 -7184. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 433 -0179 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DATE: February 2, 2004 PROJECT: Foster Ridge PERMIT NO: PW03 -106 PLAN REVIEWER: Contact Joanna Spencer at (206) 431 -2440 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. 1) Since your project will be clearing one or more acres of land, applicant shall obtain an NPDES (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System) permit from Washington State Department of Ecology. Proof of the NPDES permit needs to be submitted to Public Works before a Public ' Works Type C Construction permit can be issued. 2) Due to severe drainage problems downstream of proposed storm drainage discharge from CB #11 and further north from 13723 Macadam Road S., existing drainage system cannot accommodate any more flow. There is an existing 12" storm drainage pipe between lots 10 and 11, 13749 and 13747 Macadam Road S., connecting into a 4 ft. x 4 ft. box culvert under Macadam Road S. that discharges into a creek. There is enough capacity in this system to accommodate the additional drainage flow generated by your proposed development. 3) The City of Tukwila allows a maximum height of rockeries to be 4 feet, otherwise a structural retaining wall is required. Please replace rockery detail 1 /C5 on Sheet C10 with City of Tukwila Rockery Detail RS -05 or replace rockeries with retaining walls and make appropriate adjustments to your site plan. Each retaining wall over 4.0 -ft high requires a separate building permit application. 4) Retaining walls over 4 feet in height require a separate permit from the Building Department. Please show top and bottom elevations of each proposed rockery and/or retaining wall. Please show where drainage behind rockery(s) and/or retaining wall(s) ties to. 5) Due to site conditions, curtain drain(s) and level spreader will not be allowed due to heavy saturation. 6) Identify wet season time line in construction note on Sheet C3. 7) Show all three existing driveways at the end of S 140 St. and how the drainage will be resolved at the end of S 140 St. Please analyze if there is any conflict between new proposed driveway and existing driveways. Please note that maximum driveway and/or access road slope shall not exceed 15 %. Comments PW03 -106 Page 2 February 2, 2004 8) At S 139 St. intersection, show existing house #4525 driveway, rockery, and drainage under the driveway. Show where S 139 St. pavement ends. 9) Water quality/detention vault requires a separate permit from the Building Department. This vault shall be totally placed underground. Public Works will not allow this vault to be partly above ground. Please note that this vault will be private and maintained by the individual six property owners. 10) On details 2/C5 and 3/C5 on Sheet C10, please specify what 2" and 6" CSBC consists of. 11) Please contact U.S. Post Master at 1- 800 - 275 -8777 and show proposed location of mailboxes. 12) Due to required storm drainage redesign and the complexity of the project, a follow -up meeting with Planning, Public Works, and the Fire Department is required to cover private access roads, Fire Department turnarounds, individual driveways, road monumentation, and end of road signage. I have attached Fire Department permit conditions for reference. 13) A Sensitive Area Covenant and Hold Harmless Agreement shall be executed and recorded against the property prior to start of construction. Please let us know if the property owner is an individual, partnership, LLC or a corporation, so we can provide you with an appropriate notary page. 14) A Hold Harmless Agreement for work in the City right -of -way shall be executed and filed with the City prior to any work inside the City right -of -way. 15) Applicant shall submit a private maintenance agreement for any common infrastructure (storm drainage, access roads, etc.) shared by newly created lots. 16) Please provide a geotechnical note on your plans and list all geotechnical reports that pertain to your project (name of the geotech firm, phone no., report titles and dates). 17) The City of Tukwila has an undergrounding ordinance, all utilities shall be placed underground. Show how power, cable /telecommunication will be brought to the individual lots. Also submit a composite utility plan showing all the existing and proposed utilities to assure that there is no conflict together with a site survey showing the existibg conditions. (P:Laurie Admin/]oanna/Comments PW03 -106) City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 Parcel No.: 3229200090 Address: Suite No: Tenant: FOSTER RIDGE 1: ** *FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS * ** PERMIT CONDITIONS ( Permit Number: PWO3 -106 Status: PENDING Applied Date: 11/07/2003 Issue Date: 2: Every building shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways with all- weather driving surface of not less than 20' wide and 13'6" vertical clearance. Access roads in excess of 150' shall be provided with an approved turn - around area. Access shall be within 150' of all portions of the buildings. (City Ordinance #1846) 3: All required hydrants and surface access roads shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and during the time of constructino. (UFC 901.3) 4: For all commercial, multi - family and single family subdivisions, hydrants shall be placed so that a hydrant is within 150 feet of any building and so that no point of a building (around it's perimeter) is greater than 300 feet from a hydrant. Distance from a hydrant to a building is measurd along the path of vehicular travel. (City Ordinance #1692) 5: Fire hydrants shall conform to American Water Works Association specifications C- 502 -54, it shall be compression type, equipped with two 2 1/2" N.S.T. hose ports and one 5" Storz pumper discharge port, and shall have a 1 1/4" Pentagon open -lift operating nut. (City Ordinance #1692) 6: An approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premisese upon which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. When any portion of the facility or building protected is in excess of 150 feet (45,720 mm) from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the faiclity or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the chief. (UFC 903.2) 7: The minimum fire flow and flow duration requirements for one- and two- family dwellings having a fire area which does not exceed 3,600 square feet (344.5 m2) shall be 1,000 gallons per minute (3785.4 L/min). Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire area in excess of 3,600 square feet (344.5 m2) shall not be less than that specified in Table A- III -A -1. Exception: A reduction in required fire flow of 50 percent as approved by the chief, is allowed when the building is provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. (UFC Appendix III -A, sec. 5.1) 8: Utility and detention vaults, located in fire apparatus access roads, shall be designed to withstand an outrigger load of 68 lbs. per square inch. 9: Any overlooked hazardous condition and /or violation of the adopted Fire or Building Codes does not imply approval of such condition or violation. 10: These plans were reviewed by Marshal 51. If you have any questions, please call Tukwila Fire Prevention Bureau at (206)575 -4407. hereby certify that I have read these conditions and will comply with them as outlined. All provisions of law and ordinances governing this work will be complied with, whether specified herein or not. The granting of this permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provision of any other work or local laws doc: Conditions PW03 -106 Printed: 02 -12 -2004 DATE: November 18, 2003 PROJECT NAME: Foster Ridge PLAN CHECK NO.: PW03 -106 PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS Plan Reviewer: Contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670 if you have any questions regarding the following comments. The permit application is incomplete, please submit the following items: 1. Tree permit plan identifying all trees to be removed on 20% or greater slopes or within the wetland buffer; 2. tree replacement calculation for those trees; 3. and a planting plan for the replacement trees. The conceptual storm drainage plan approved in the 10/18/2002 Notice of Decision did not include the proposed spreader. Construction of the spreader requires the removal of trees and additional work within the wetland buffer. Since minimal grading is proposed for the line that leads to the spreader, why are 6 trees near the spreader shown within the clearing limits (and presumably to be removed)? The work required for the BLA must be complete prior to 4/18/2004, therefore construction must occur within the rainy season. Please revise sheet C3 to 'show compliance with the note about piping to the bottom of the slope. Due to the delay in applying for permits you have missed the 2003 season to control blackberries in accordance with the buffer enhancement plan. When will you perform the buffer enhancement? Q:IFOST RDG\PWPermit.DOC BUILDING DIVISION REVIEW Date: Project Name: Application #: Plan Reviewer: Dec. 5, 2003 Foster Ridge site work permit application PW03 -106 Ken Nelsen, Senior Plans Examiner Tukwila Building Division 6300 SouthCenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 206-431 -3670 A general Building Division plan review has been conducted on the subject project. It is Department policy that retaining walls greater than 4 feet in height or walls supporting a surcharge and detentions vaults must be submitted to the city as separate building permits. Please consider the following comments along with your building permit applications. 1. Retaining walls which require a building permit, may only be constructed of concrete or manufactured wall products designed for such application. a) Provide the manufactures installation instruction for pre - manufactured materials. b) Provide a site specific geo-technical report. c) Plan details must reflect the specific soil conditions of the subject geo- technical report. d) The retaining wall details must also include any drainage requirements, drainage discharge and discharge location. 2. Storm water detention vaults applications, must be accompanied with plans, vault construction details, geo-technical report and structural engineering calculations completed,by a Washington State licensed structural Engineer. Should there be questions on these requirements, please feel free to contact the Building Division office at 206 -431 -3670. No further comments at this time. December 8, 2003 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director RE: Foster Ridge Request for Extension Dear Mr. Friel: I received your letter requesting a one year extension on the expiration date on the Foster Ridge project rather than the 6 month extension that the City previously granted. Unfortunately the Subdivision Code is clear that the Short Subdivision Committee is only authorized to grant a single extension of up to six months, TMC 17.08.050. No additional time is permitted and so the boundary line adjustment will expire on April 18, 2004 unless all of the conditions of approval have been met and the final documents have been recorded with King County. S'ncerely, Jo k Pace, DCD Deputy Director cc: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director Nora Gierloff, Planning Supervisor 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 November 19, 2003 MEMO TO: FROM: REF: Jack Pace, DCD Deputy Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Fax 206 - 431 -3665 John B Friel for R S. "Dick" Pedersen JBMF Consulting Engineer P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 Fax 425- 673 -7674 Foster Ridge Development L97 -0026 Boundary Line Adjustment L97 -0027 Administrative Planned Residential Development We received your letter of October 16, 2003, reference Foster Ridge Extension, in which you are granting a single six month extension. We would like you to consider amending the time extension in order to provide us with one year. The following items are related to the current status of our referenced project and indicate the need for additional time. 1. Critical to this project, was the requirement to obtain an easement for storm drainage on the Benito Cervantes property. Without this easement we could not effectively move forward with the final design. We were finally successful in obtaining the Cervantes easement on May 9, 2003. Our consultants, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI), Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers (PACE) and Shelton & Associates were collectively engaged in project design up to October 2003. As noted by the construction plan documents, the actual scope of work on this project is substantial in comparison to typical boundary line adjustment requests which usually only involve legal description documents. 2. On November 7, 2003 we submitted the final construction drawings, a 14 sheet plan set prepared by PACE, along with the geotechnical report by AESI, a technical information report by PACE, a wetlands buffer enhancement plan by Sheldon & Assaociates, and with the permit application we included a cost estimate and paid a review fee of $4,301.25. It will likely be several weeks and possibly a few months for the review and approval of this submittal to be completed. With plans of this extent, a second submittal for review is typical. 3. We estimate that it will take at least 90 (or more) days and a total cost upwards of $250,000.00 to do the complete construction after the permits are obtained. 4. We are now at the beginning of the rainy season and that normally lasts thru the months of March and April. The property is defined as "critical area ", is site sensitive and construction would normally only be recommended to be done during the good weather months and not during the rainy season. This was reflected on our initial application to do the work during the summer months (97 & 98). It would be best for all parties to do the construction during the spring and summer of 2004. 5. The Notice of Decision letter of October 18, 2002, included a provision indicating the City of Tukwila may grant a single one year extension. Based on the above, we respectfully, request that you amend the expiration date and give us until October 18, 2004 to complete the project. Sincerely, John B. Friel, for R. S. "Dick" Pedersen REVISED WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT PLAN Foster Ridge Property Tukwila, Washington Prepared for: Richard Pedersen Parkside Management P.O. Box 1518 Marysville, WA 98270 Prepared by: Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE Seattle, WA 98105 (206) 522 -1214 June 11, 2003 Introduction Foster Ridge is a proposed residential development to be located on 2.92 acres at South 139 Street and 46` Avenue South (Figure 1 - Vicinity Map). The current proposal is for 6 lots to be located in the southwest portion of the property (Figure 2 — Site Map). All lots would lie to the west of Wetland 1. Lot 2, as shown on current plans, would encroach into the 50 -foot buffer around this Type 2 wetland. The City of Tukwila has requested that the Conceptual Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan (Sheldon & Associates 1997) be modified to reflect the new 6 -lot layout and to propose mitigation for the buffer reduction along the south side of Lot 2 from 50 to 25 feet. The length of the buffer area that will be reduced by 25 feet is approximately 100 feet. The previous buffer enhancement plan called for planting in all of the buffer around Wetland 1. Because of the change in lot layout, mitigation is now only required for the buffer encroachment along Lot (City of Tukwila letter to John Friel, dated October 18, 2002). This report includes information on existing conditions in the buffer, details on proposed site preparation, planting plan, performance standards, maintenance plan, and monitoring plan. Existing Conditions Two wetlands are located on the site as described in the Wetland Delineation and Functional Values Assessment (Sheldon & Associates 1995). Wetland 2 is located mostly offsite. Wetland 1 is mostly onsite. This is a Type 2 wetland with a 50 -foot buffer. The buffer adjacent to Lot 2 is dominated primarily by Himalayan blackberry (Rubus procerus) with a patchy canopy of small red alder (Alnus rubra) and black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera). The average tree stem diameter in the area is about 7 inches and canopy cover ranges from 20 to 60 percent. There is a large opening in the canopy in the buffer where the Himalayan blackberry reaches up to 90 percent cover. Reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) and creeping nightshade (Solanum dulcamara) are the other invasive species that are present in the buffer, although these currently have negligible cover. Himalayan blackberry and reed canarygrass are also present in the wetland adjacent to this portion of the buffer. Buffer Enhancement Plan Overview The buffer enhancement plan will apply to the hatched area shown on Figure 2 and labeled as "Wetland Buffer Planting Area ". This area is 25 feet wide and about 100 feet long, totaling about 2,500 square feet. Figure 3 (3 pages) shows the buffer enhancement plant. The primary goal is for this plan to result in an enhanced wetland buffer with improved functions, vegetated with native plants appropriate to the surrounding upland and wetland vegetation. This goal will be met by implementation of the following objectives: 1. Remove and control invasive Himalayan blackberry with a combination of mowing, spot application of herbicide, and hand - grubbing. Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 1 June 11. 2003 2. Install plants at high densities to establish vegetative coverage as quickly as possible. 3. Apply sheet mulch as well as organic /chip mulch. 4. Perform site maintenance by regularly removing re- sprouting Himalayan blackberry and other invasive weedy species within planting area. 5. Maintain clear zone that is free of Himalayan blackberry in 5' wide perimeter strip around planted area to minimize re- invasion of planting area from outside. 6. Provide supplemental watering if needed in first two years. 7. Perform site monitoring as specified in this plan and submit monitoring reports to client and designated City of Tukwila staff. Site Preparation Site preparation is specified on Sheet 3 of the Planting Plan at the end of this report. Portions of this text are duplicated here. Clearing Invasive Plants Himalayan blackberry is a prevalent and problematic species at the site. Removal and control of this species will require ongoing and regular maintenance throughout the three year maintenance and monitoring period for this project to be successful and meet performance standards. Initial removal of Himalayan blackberry should be done as follows. Mow all blackberry in planting area to the ground in early -mid summer. Preserve all native shrubs within planting area (limited to half dozen individuals + willow thicket). Do not damage any existing native trees with mowing equipment. After 3 -4 weeks or when re- sprouting of blackberry occurs, cut sprouts to 3 -6" above ground and dab cut end with glyphosate herbicide. Cut ends should be dabbed within 1 -2 hours of cutting. Herbicide used must be approved for use around aquatic areas — e.g. Rodeo. Herbicide application should ideally be done in late summer (August) when plants are drawing carbohydrate reserves into the root systems. Planting Planting should not be done at the site until at least 6 weeks after herbicide application. Ideal planting time is late fall (Oct -Nov), when plants are dormant. This will minimize transplant shock and the need for immediate watering. Plants must be of local origin (genotype from western Washington lowland elevation). It is intended that plants be installed in dense clusters rather than evenly spaced across the entire planting area. This should help new , plantings establish dominance, by creating shade /cover to outcompete invasives as quickly as possible. Planting schemes for each of the two specific micro -site conditions are illustrated at the end of this report (Sheets 1 and 2). A complete plant list is given in Table 1. Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 2 June II, 2003 Sclentiflc Name Common Name Qt i Size S . acin r Trees Pseudotsuga menzlesll Douglas fir 12 2 gal 6 -12' o.c. ThuJa plicate westem red cedar 18 2 gal _ 6 -12' o.c. Tsuga heterophylla westem hemlock 12 2 gal 6 -12' o.c subtotal 42 Shrubs Crataegus douglasil Douglas hawthome 20 2 gal 3-6' o.c Oemlarla cerasiformis Indian plum 20 2 gal 3 -6' o.c Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 75 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. ' Rubus parvlflmus thlmblebeny 20 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. Rubus spectabllis salmonberry 40 2 gal 3-4' o.c Salix scoulerlana Scouler willow 20 2 gal 3-6' o.c Sambucus racemosa red elderberry 15 .2 gal 4-6' o.c. Symphoricarpos albus snowberry 75 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. subtotal 285 Total ii of plants 327 Table 1. Plant List for Buffer Enhancement. Plants should be installed in plant pits at least twice the diameter of the plant container /root ball. The bottom of the planting hole should be scarified. Plant pits should be backfilled with native soil and watered in at the time of planting. Plants should be installed at the same soil depth as they were planted in the pots. Each plant will be planted with one 21 gram slow . release fertilizer tablet (Agriform 20 -10 -5 or equivalent — available from Forestry Suppliers Inc.). Each plant will be marked with brightly colored plastic flagging. After plant installation, each plant should be sheet - mulched with a double layer of commercial grade cardboard (e.g appliance boxes). Sheet mulch squares should be approximately 3' x 3' for each plant, and should cover the soil directly over the installed plant. After cardboard has been laid down, the entire planting area will be mulched with mixed arborist chips to a depth of 4 ". This is done to retain soil moisture, add organic material to soil matrix over time, and to combat weeds. Chip mulch should be kept from touching the trunks of installed plants (e.g. keep 1" around entire circumference of trunk clear of chips). Bark mulch or cedar chips are not acceptable substitutions for specified mulch. Total quantity of chips required to mulch planting area to a depth of 4" = 28 cu. yds. (assumes 2500 sq. ft. planting area — adjust amount as needed for differing area). Maintenance Due to site conditions (partial shade, soil moisture) and extensive mulching, supplemental watering is not anticipated to be necessary. However, site conditions should be monitored carefully in the first year, and a plan or strategy for temporary irrigation should be made at the time of planting in case it is necessary. Supplemental watering is generally 1" of water weekly during the first growing season, tapering to Y2" weekly the second year. Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 3 June 11, 2003 The landscape contractor will be responsible for guaranteeing installed plants for one year after initial planting. During the warranty period, the contractor will be required (by contract) to provide maintenance for the project. Maintenance in the first year will include weeding, replacement of dead or dying plants, watering as needed, trash removal, and re- application of chip mulch to maintain a depth of at least 4" in the first year after installation. Maintenance needs in subsequent years will depend on site conditions, but will involve regular weed control and chip mulch re- application at a minimum. Maintenance Schedule Performance Standards Measurable performance standards are necessary to assess the achievement of success or failure of a project. Performance standards for this project are as follows: 1. Aerial coverage Planted material Invasive non - native species Year 1 no standard <10% Year 2 >50% <10% Year 3 >75% <10% Aerial coverage will be measured by visual estimate across the entire site for invasive species. For planted material, aerial coverage will be measured within representative plots and extrapolated for the entire site. Desirable native species that volunteer within the planting area can be included in aerial coverage estimates. 2. Plant Survival of Installed Material Year 1 • 100% (guaranteed by contractor) Year 2' >85% Year 3 >85% Plant survival will be calculated in the first year by counting each installed individual. In subsequent years, survival can be calculated by counting all installed individuals on site or by counting individuals within plots and extrapolating for the entire site. 3. Plant Species Diversity Tree layer: 3 native conifer species present and growing in each of three monitoring years Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 4 June 11, 2003 Action Year Weed Control Watering Trash Mulch Re- planting 1 April, June, August June -Oct as needed April, June, August summer/fall as needed fall _ 2 April, June, August June -Oct as needed April, June, August summer/fall as needed 3 To be determined To be determined To be determined fall To be determined The landscape contractor will be responsible for guaranteeing installed plants for one year after initial planting. During the warranty period, the contractor will be required (by contract) to provide maintenance for the project. Maintenance in the first year will include weeding, replacement of dead or dying plants, watering as needed, trash removal, and re- application of chip mulch to maintain a depth of at least 4" in the first year after installation. Maintenance needs in subsequent years will depend on site conditions, but will involve regular weed control and chip mulch re- application at a minimum. Maintenance Schedule Performance Standards Measurable performance standards are necessary to assess the achievement of success or failure of a project. Performance standards for this project are as follows: 1. Aerial coverage Planted material Invasive non - native species Year 1 no standard <10% Year 2 >50% <10% Year 3 >75% <10% Aerial coverage will be measured by visual estimate across the entire site for invasive species. For planted material, aerial coverage will be measured within representative plots and extrapolated for the entire site. Desirable native species that volunteer within the planting area can be included in aerial coverage estimates. 2. Plant Survival of Installed Material Year 1 • 100% (guaranteed by contractor) Year 2' >85% Year 3 >85% Plant survival will be calculated in the first year by counting each installed individual. In subsequent years, survival can be calculated by counting all installed individuals on site or by counting individuals within plots and extrapolating for the entire site. 3. Plant Species Diversity Tree layer: 3 native conifer species present and growing in each of three monitoring years Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 4 June 11, 2003 Year Site Visit Report 0 Fall (post - construction) As -built report (faIl/winter) 1 April (w /contractor), June (monitoring) Annual monitoring report (July) 2 April (w /contractor), June (monitoring) Annual monitoring report (July) 3 June (monitoring) Final monitoring report (July) Shrub layer: 3 native shrub species present and growing in each of three monitoring years in open canopy portion of planting area; 7 native shrub species present and growing in each of three monitoring years in closed canopy portion of planting area. Monitoring Monitoring of the project should be done annually per City of Tukwila code requirements. Site monitoring should include measurement of all parameters described in the Performance Standards section of this report. Permanent plots or transects should be established and monitored each year. Plots or transects should be located to represent typical site conditions within the project area. Permanent photo - points should also be established so as to depict the entire project area. Site photos should be taken annually and submitted with monitoring reports. Site monitoring should be performed by June 30 of each monitoring year, and monitoring reports should be submitted to the client and designated City of Tukwila staff person within one month of the monitoring site visit. Subsequent to project installation, a site visit should be made to confirm that the project was installed according to plan (as -built conditions). It is also strongly recommended that the monitoring biologist or project designer meet on site with the contractor at the start of the first year post - construction (March/April) to review weed control and watering protocols. Monitorinq Schedule Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 5 June 11, 2003 Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Figure 1 Vicinity Map Sheldon & Associates, Inc. pl Oct #03 -772 June 10, 2003 1 z I I R7 •i 1 1 ' $lantind Scheme for entire area .185 shrubs @ average spacing of 3-4' on center 80 trees @ average spacing of 8' on center Species List for example 625 sq. ft area shown Shrubs: qty 60 shrubs Crataegus douglasll — Douglas hawthome Oemlaria cerasiformis — Indian plum Pose nutkana — Nootka rose Pubus spectabllis - salmonberry Salix scoulerlana — Scouter willow Sambucus racemosa — red elderberry Symphorlcarpos albus — snowberry Trees: qty 12 trees ThuJa plicate — westem red cedar s Tsuga heterophylla — westem hemlock PLANTING SCHEME FOR CLOSED CANOPY AREA (Approx. 1800-2000 sq. ft.) Zs' LEGEND 10% qty = 6 10% qty = 6 20% qty = 12 20% qty = 12 10% qty = 6 10% qty = 6 20% qty. = 12 Subtotal = 60 60% qty = 7 40% qty = 5 Subtotal =12 i Closed canopy area constitutes the majority of the buffer that is to be enhanced. Cluster plantings in groups of same species. Rose and snowberry are to be planted densely in one or two thickets at 2 -3' a spacing, while larger shrubs, are spaced more widely 3 -6' on center as shown. Conifers are to be planted in groups with spacing ranging 't from 6 -12' on center. cedar hemlock 0 O O N I PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 1 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 willow salmonberry elderberry hawthome Indian plum rose /snowberry 4 • Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE 0204 Seattle, WA 08105 Ph 208. 522.1214 - Fx 208. 522.3507 Wetlands Env/momenta! consultants 4 i t 1 • PLANTING SCHEME FOR OPEN CANOPY AREA (Approx. 600 sq. ft.) piantina Scheme for entire area 100 shrubs @ average spacing of 2 -3' on center 12 trees @ average spacing of 8' on center Species List for example 625 sq. ft. area shown Shrubs: qty 100 shrubs Rosa nutkana — Nootka rose Rubus pa/vlflorus — thimbleberry Symphorlcarpos albus — snowberry Trees: qty 12 trees Pseudotsuga menziesil — Douglas fir 40% qty. = 40 20% qty. = 20 40% qty. = 40 Subtotal = 100 100% qty. = 12 Subtotal =12 LEGEND T Open canopy area is located along the north side of the wetland buffer that is to be enhanced. Rose and snowberry are to be planted densely across the area, with several patches of thimbieberry. Douglas fir are to be planted In groups with spacing ranging from 6 -12' on center. PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 2 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 Douglas fir thimbleberry rose /snowberry .,...; Sheldon & Associates, inc. 5031 University Way NE 5204 S.attl., WA 08105 Ph 208. 522.1214 • Fit 208.522.3507 Wetland & Environmental Consultants Scientific Name C Common Name Q Qty S Size S Spacing Trees Pseudotsuga menziesll D Douglas fir 1 12 2 2_9aI 6 6 -12' o.c. ThuJa plicate w western red cedar 1 18 2 2 gal 6 6 -12' o.c. Tsuga heterophylla w westem hemlock 1 12 2 2 gal 6 6 -12' o.c subtotal 4 42 Shrubs Crataegus douglasii D Douglas hawthome 2 20 2 2 gal 3 3 -6' o.c Oemlaria cerasiform/s I Indian plum 2 20 2 2 gal 3 3 -6' o.c Rosa nutkana N Nootka rose 7 75 1 1 gal 2 2 -3' o.c. Rubus parvlflrous t thimbleberry ' ' 20 1 1 gal 2 2 -3' o.c. Rubus spectabilis s salmonberry 4 40 2 2 gal 3 3-4' o.c Salix scouleriana S Scouler willow 2 20 2 2 gal 3 3 -6' o.c Sambucus racemosa r red elderberry 1 15 2 2 gal 4 4 -6' o.c. Symphorlcarpos albus s snowberry 7 75 1 1 gal 2 2 -3' o.c. subtotal 2 285 Total # of plants 3 327 . PLANT SCHEDULE FOR WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT . Note: Plants must be of local origin (genotype from western Washington lowland elevation). SITE PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION NOTES 1, Mow all blackberry in planting area to the ground in early -mid summer. Preserve all native shrubs within planting area (limited to half dozen individuals + willow thicket). Do not damage any existing native trees With Mowing equipment. Dispose of all plant debris off-site. . After 3-4 weeks or when re- sprouting of blackberry occurs, cut sprouts to 3 -6" above ground and dab cut end with glyphosate herbicide. Cut ends should be dabbed within 1 - 2 hours of cutting. Herbicide used must be approved for use around aquatic areas — e.g. Rodeo. Herbicide application should ideally be done in late summer (August) when plants are drawing carbohydrate reserves into the root systems. 3. Planting should not be done at the site until at least 6 weeks after herbicide application. Ideal planting time is late fall (Oct -Nov), when plants are dormant. This will minimize transplant shock and the need for Immediate watering. 4. Plants should be installed in plant pits at least twice the diameter of the plant container /root ball. Bottom of the planting hole should be scarified. Plant pits should be backfilled with native soil and watered in at the time of planting. Plants should be installed at the same soil depth as they were planted in the pots. Each plant will be planted with one 2i gram slow release fertilizer tablet (Agriform 20 -10 -5 or equivalent — available from Forestry Suppliers Inc.). Each plant will be marked with brightly colored plastic flagging. 5. After plant installation, each plant should be sheet- mulched with a double layer of commercial grade cardboard (e.g appliance boxes). Sheet mulch squares should be approximately 2 -3' x 2 -3' for each plant, and should cover the soil directly over the installed plant. 6. After cardboard has been laid down, the entire planting area will be mulched with mixed arborist chips to a depth of 4 ". This is done to retain soil moisture, add organic material to soil matrix over time, and to combat weeds. Chip mulch should be kept from touching the trunks of installed plants (e.g. keep 1" around entire circumference of trunk clear of chips). Bark mulch or cedar chips are not acceptable substitutions for specified mulch. Total quantity of chips required to mulch planting area to a depth of 4" = 28 cu. yds. (assumes 2500 sq. ft. planting area — adjust amount as needed for differing area). 7. Due to site conditions (partial shade, soil moisture) and extensive mulching, supplemental watering is not anticipated to be necessary. However, site conditions should be monitored carefully in the first year, and a plan or strategy for temporary irrigation should be made at the time of planting in case it is necessary. Supplemental watering Is generally 1" of water weekly during the first growing season, tapering to W weekly the second year. PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 3 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 •1 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE 0204 Seattle. WA 58105 Ph 205- 522.1214 • Fx 206 - 5223507 Wetland 6 Envlmnmentaf consultants October 18, 2002 John B. Friel P.O. Box 27 Everett, WA 98206 RE: Foster Ridge Development L97 -0026 Boundary Line Adjustment L97 -0027 Administrative Planned Residential Development Dear Mr. Friel: The Short Subdivision Committee has completed review of your boundary line adjustment and administrative planned residential development applications and determined that they comply with all applicable City code requirements. The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions This letter serves as the Notice of Decision per TMC 18.104.170. Based on the latest project submittal, preliminary approval is granted subject to the conditions stated below. There are three basic steps in the approval process: 1. Preliminary Approval Utilities NOTICE OF DECISION This letter constitutes your preliminary approval. The application was reviewed by the Tukwila Short Subdivision Committee and approved with conditions. The conditions imposed are to ensure the boundary line adjustment is consistent with the Criteria for Preliminary Approval listed at TMC 17.08.030 C in the Tukwila Subdivision Code. PRELIMINARY APPROVAL CONDITIONS a. Drainage design for the site shall be developed according to the Pace Engineering Conceptual Storm Layout drawing dated July 2002 and shall meet City of Tukwila Surface Page 1 Access Fire Protection g. Geotechnical Water Ordinance Requirements. Your submittal for a miscellaneous permit to construct the utility systems shall address the City's questions raised in the July 19, 2000 and September 4, 2002 letters. b. Pursuant to the Tukwila "underground ordinance ", all utilities shall be placed underground. c. Extension of the sewer and water lines to the lots shall be approved by the appropriate utility. As -built plans shall be provided to the Public Works Department prior to fmal approval. d. The drainage easement over Mr. Cervantes' property must be revised per the attached redlines. This will be a private easement between the property owners and Mr. Cervantes and the City will not be a party to the agreement. e. Access roads built to Public Works and Fire Department standards must be provided to all lots as shown on the plan prepared by Pace Engineering dated July 2002. This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. f. Your submittal for a Miscellaneous permit to construct the access roads and install the utilities must contain a grading plan that shows the location of all proposed retaining walls and gives estimated cut and fill quantities. Certain retaining walls may require separate building permits and structural review. Please contact the Public Works Department for additional information. There must be a fire hydrant within 250 feet of all building sites. If the fire hydrant is not capable of a 1000 gallon per minute flow the future houses will be required to provide interior sprinlders, to be approved by the Fire Department. This requirement must be met prior to issuance of any building permits. h. The property owners will need to sign, notarize and record the revised geotechnical covenant prior to final approval (see attached). i. The recommendation from Associated Earth Sciences, contained in their July 11, 2002 letter, that there be an on -site inspector for the geotechnical engineer during the construction of foundations, retaining walls, water, sewer, and surface water utilities, and driveways shall be a condition of the Miscellaneous permit. The on -site inspector shall verify in writing, on a daily basis, with the reports sent to the City's Department of Public Works, that all construction work has been performed in accordance with approved plans L97 -0026 Page 2 General J. and specifications, permit requirements, and that the construction work complies with all of the geotechnical's recommendations. The wetland mitigation/buffer enhancement plan prepared by Sheldon & Associates must be revised to reflect the current lot layout. The 6 lot proposal only requires mitigation for the reduction of the wetland buffer from 50' to 25' along Lot 2. k. The edges of the wetland buffer easements on lots 2, 3, 4 and 6 shall be delineated with a split rail fence and signage per TMC 18.45.060 6. 1. You will need to obtain all required permits prior to beginning any construction. For water and sewer permits, contact the individual provider District. For City of Tukwila utilities, site grading, and access driveways contact Tukwila Public Works at (206) 433 -0179. m. Install all required site improvements, including those proposed in the application and those identified above as conditions of approval. n. Submit a set of recording documents in either legal or record of survey format that meet the King County Recorder's requirements and contain the following items: 1. A survey map as described in the application checklist that is consistent with all of the conditions of approval. The surveyor's original signature must be on the face of the plat. 2. Existing and proposed legal descriptions for all lots. 3. Legal description of the access /utility easements. 4. Joint Maintenance Agreements for the easements, drainage system and open space tract. 5. Legal description of the wetland buffer easement across lots 3, 4 and 6. APPEALS This BLA approval decision is appealable to the Hearing Examiner. One administrative appeal of the decision on the BLA is permitted. If an MDNS was issued, any person wishing to challenge either the conditions which were imposed by the MDNS decision or the failure of the Department to impose additional conditions in the MDNS may raise such issues as part of the appeal . If no valid appeals are filed within the time limit the decision of the Department will be final. L97 -0026 Page 3 In order to appeal the decision a written notice of appeal must be filed with the Department of Community Development within 21 days of the issuance of the Notice of Decision (xx/xx/xxxx). The requirements for such appeals are set forth in Tukwila Municipal Code 18.116. Appeal materials shall include: Expiration 1. The name of the appealing party. 2. The address and phone number of the appealing party; and if the appealing party is a corporation, association or other group, the address and phone number of a contact person authorized to receive notices on the appealing party's behalf. 3. A statement identifying the decision being appealed and the alleged errors m the decision. The Notice of Appeal shall state specific errors of fact or errors in application of the law in the decision being appealed; the harm suffered or anticipated by the appellant, and the relief sought. The scope of an appeal shall be limited to matters or issues raised in the Notice of Appeal. Any appeal shall be conducted as an open record hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's decision on the appeal is the City's final decision. A party who is not satisfied with the outcome of the administrative appeal process may file an appeal in King County Superior Court from the Hearing Examiner's decision pursuant to the procedures and time limitations set forth in RCW 36.70C. An appeal challenging a DNS, an MDNS or an EIS may be included in such an appeal. 2. Final Approval The next step is to install the required site improvements, comply with the conditions of approval and submit the necessary documents (survey, legal descriptions, and other required paper work). After the documents have been found to be in order, and the all of the requirements of the BLA have been met, the Chair of the Short Subdivision Committee signs your paperwork which constitutes a grant of fmal approval. No permits for the construction of houses on the site will be granted prior to the recording of the BLA. All taxes and fees assessed against the property must be current prior to final approval. Please check with the King County Assessor's Office and the City of Tukwila Finance Department prior to submitting final mylars. The final approved documents must be filed with the King County Department of Records by October 18, 2003, one year from the date of this preliminary approval or the application will expire. The City may grant a single one year extension if requested in writing prior to the expiration date. L97 -0026 Page 4 3. Recording Sincerely, The signature of the Chairman of the Short Subdivision Committee certifies that your application is ready for recording. It is your responsibility to record the City approved documents with the King County Department of Records. You will need to pay the recording fees and submit your approved original drawings to King County, see the Recording Procedures handout. The BLA is not complete until the recording occurs and copies of the recorded documents are provided to the Department of Community Development. After recording, the County returns the recorded original to the City of Tukwila within 4 -6 weeks, at which time your BLA is considered complete. You can shorten this processing time by hand - delivering a copy of the recorded document to the project planner. Steve Lancaster Chair, Short Subdivision Committee Enclosures: Redlined Drainage Easement Revised Geotechnical Covenant cc: Jim Morrow, Public Works Director (please initial your approval) Tom Keefe, Fire Chief (please initial your approval) King County Assessor, Accounting Division Department of Ecology, SEPA Division William Looney Benito Cervantes Jon Beahm Cyril Mork L97 -0026 Page 5 February 26, 2001 MEMO TO: John McFarland City Administrator City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa., 98188 FAX FROM: John B. Friel /Richard S. JBMF Consulting Engineer P.O. Box 27 Everett, Wa., 98206 FAX 206 - 433 -1833 Pedersen 425 - 778 - 3509 REF: Six Lot Plan Boundary Line Adjustment & Administrative PRD Foster Ridge (Lots in Hellwigs Addition) City of Tukwila The following is in regard to the current status of the reference plan and is presented to you in our interest of keeping you informed as to our project. Project Status: Since our last meeting with you in your office on October 17, 2000 we have engaged Gary Flowers of Associated Earth Sciences to do certain additional geotechnical work and Phil Cheesman of PACE Engineering to provide the design details for the six lot development plan. One of the first items of priority for the final design, as required by the City, is to obtain a storm drainage easement in order to connect the storm drainage from the site to the system at McAdam Road. During the past several months we have been in the process of contacting and negotiating a easement location accross a property owned by a Mr. Tom Gengler. That process has been somewhat slow and methodical, but we believe we are close to reaching agreement with Mr. Gengler. I am meeting with him at the property on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 and hopefully this will result in a tentative agreement for the easement. The easement is being secured to the City of Tukwila. Upon securing the easement, we will then complete the detail design plans and with the geotech review and report submit to the City for review and approval. We are hopeful that this will all be accomplished during the next month or so. Several other items have been previously discussed and are mentioned as follows: Wetland and Open Space Tract: During one of our earlier meetings with you on August 30, 2000, you mentioned that the large open space tract provided by our site plan might be utilized by certain interests in the Tukwila Community as a educational site related to observing a forested wetland and may provide some limited use for passive recreational purposes. At our earlier meeting , it seemed to us that you were in support of looking at the potential for access and use of this opens space tract for a community purpose and benifite. Should we pursue this opportunity? Area Drainage: A upland drainage area of approximately 18 acres is associated with the subject Foster Ridge approximately 3 acre site. Surface drainage from the upland area enters the site from within several of the City rights -of -way surrounding and contiguous to our site. This results in storm drainage water entering our site directly at the end of pavements from streets 140th St. S. and 139th St. S. and across unopended right -of -way portions of streets 140th St. S and 46th Ave. S. This drainage from the upland also includes a concentrated source of water from a spring (with associated structures) located within the 140th St. S. right -of -way (unopend) that provides most of the water which creates the defined wetland on our site. Because of the relationship between our site and the City streets we are severly impacted by the existing drainage system. Securing the drainage easement for a outlet and a connection to the McAdam Road system will be an important part and critical element of the plan. We would like to inquire as to what might be available from the City to assist us in developing our storm water management plan for the six lots and what is available as a City sponsored contribution or participation in the best use of the above open space tract. I will present this memo to you at our scheduled meeting in your office on Wednesday, February 28, 2000 at which time you perhaps could give me your comments and response. Thank you for your time in regard to the above. a2ti %y�/ — d2� ohn B. Friel, PE PLS for Richard S. Pedersen Parkside Management IZId MIA 6 //e3/59 klo_ G 4 - S . „tel .. ie 2k C...J144-641A.4 Gam - P/ er's - 3 ' X1eVet Sf :�n - t..lC✓►4- - OD o - 4-L h-a..4 -s cc' pact- r -4: , 104- L 1 /O4 -- 1 411( a„ar -i 8' 4t- r..k . -c.at it havoc. 4 1 x- frvya on 64. 1olcJo: I4 1^4 r S CP 4- a rC G. a. o.�&r - '" 3 r 2.1 / i'''►riel ✓vt. -- v 4 - �e._S� - p ; / 4-' - . 4 4, /c) rl 3 vs"w wd S OcLj C-on St s � 1 v r t - e_w on 3 6,7 -& 4 5 �.c arts' 4 )a. 6 G,ol 1 f a ' 1- cr►oLb (z a r r 5� sS n-1 �.c -c- , .b1-1(.4_1( b e p • Sa.ric� 1., rrk c• , - s a4.-e_a. GAS :dyer' o s - .- sr -1 -Lti,„ 1-5 a a(-refs a i r s (N Lon"Fc -ore.: Scot d 6-)^0.-xca( itl e- 1 891 e l 3: b; r, .06 c__ 1 La - O - trbv% 1 (1- 1 -1 r7.Y ( !:'�- 5 ) — Sv rtifi .evi.fs-- - tom i °j `j per.¢- 0 -1-1-e- / /YL / c, 54 C�-t GPJ�„C c5; . lit. Gd aev -Gs�Gal ddcn =�- �'1ez -"2._. V E` !� 1 s ad e , L- *4-s 6, 7, S "t 1 - 5 ; vei c2 V k Sloes - #J. 4,3.x - w gs ? 1✓ X•tredvvii 41. bLit Iot . M a s re.. - L ^t... V• LSVs S d to fi -. r'v�t 0 C,c., "no 4- €'4 - rt et.ot , L w ' x. 5 r�erc o� -4v bei -ss�- � Se-s arc - c - 4- nn „rtwW \ — C r4.. / arc-.. k r� cite) lee.let rvc, opt 1 v;• - e.‘=-A: c.o i 5 GOrtOes bWI Ma.4lc_ ✓- -Pet A:4.6 ;� ? i pI� ' ? relcit nelorc._ ` r►'Zv✓tia,.. a n - 1(-4. lna -we._ lat. -A 1 =5 1 � vim- --e� • A ar.. - di...› n - �.�. �..�; ll C L7 of �-- e.„60J4 - - ifAr 5 -4 y e.cr'S .=rep. - r ` / �+�' '�r , T r one( 01 e-xoktS 4.o.lo4 cu-60 0-.47 ' 33 -1-v 1 04 - 4 —( Z • - iJ✓tko o c Pvivl -4-r Q-b•-% I/ 7 r - o - Cie ) kt- 04, - k- rz.v►g ole o - r "bi^k - ? Vt c3 c 7 'd i - Cor- 4 -(.'\A s r% T 5; ;5 we -, sJ- £ sit ovCo�- vv dcz-rAv4 -d, prix �.✓�- I I rti y v J n 6 A- r1 v rv-t Gc,f- t v s 4-0 t o 01 / �{- p)4 - & - I- kroo ,;,, l pm) y cad Q (p� 1 •4- G✓R.I1.4- G` otr 4-L— b r b ac. r • L ---- h --' } q t S .l9' 'G l "(c -"Se vn ri , r" f >47 uc!). - .; - — - moo X1 — ae- opt ter✓ -� o v:, a -j. n� r 4 .77 acu --�,� "-"J-7 � vL"i"rvncl - r oPl-r" -`r: r('° - cre. ra _ , • :tiron elk 1 q;-.<79-t- ° -; eX/A: ioroc c r 1_ • • 1 dJ d - • S�S.e► "Dr'i cvd - as.a' i -t- r ' - ma j - �c - 1 1 S CZ) d - opae, G - 1/-7-7 '' -r 7e ' 1 c p + ryv —7 �..� - u.c7 - Ifi - r ` � fi 1 � " - c is -- n/IN: 7 11 - c"W 14711 -- ''j`'I - 5 OEM tJ my c i-o p rta je.. • /4.4- r .9.. n me-a- 4,-)4 v1 c n o +_ - toc -tie- a, , db D� 1 - 6 Ci t ' • X44- -s c✓ g_°'l �1 G� c›. 4 4 - Ar Sow ce-e -- j �r v '�' 1 V �.r�+er - -1-1.1 Nt L. ' ' 0 4- c„)4xx_.- ; rplex t s 4 L C. . n v v r- w c L r 1 f 4." A.ote_ �/G - /u a� r. c ; 5 4v n'kjc -in. CC// - le4 c.,l c.x. - 5 -fi e, wea-42- p rn /0Le -► Q-A 3-L 4 C44-7 .J a-5 GS t 1 - '4'kn R7JdA c.Ahi y, 4) nn,c,... (14.-N. �- > - a�_t-1 L Q el 1 !-'S P 1■■1 Jv o el 2 r a cs. 1 rcJvlc_. : C o f cArok 1-- ►Y, ? ov w off- L rwr. L4z � y � 0 Wi 4- �10 � r+� - ) G - S be i t e>t A A-C Cc, , a -k:C ► -, - 4.14.4-- o � C ; .�.�, }-r- w re_. k eYUr-r - )4 -% bko Jlct Fct7G -d4 •r% I• c3YhQrc7t 2S - e(/ 1 ✓a_ .. •vat -nrn . 1 Ler L , ack - cc' e- be_.? C-z � p ac 1 ice G - r-a>r+Z ru_18'd s . w . - "" n _ O ( on - -�- - I . - e.--)Gnrk- �w1 1( In hick v4 c 49rxe ∎ "ct.d` "-) a- i� n . c_ 4-ko v6 ) 2 14).1--5 tea.. 5 Q /.J? Se- 'S G2nar.'U e„ L'I J D rA h t�Gv�t� /s"-f cco S r' ?f) e " y bd.> r' ezt,v_luf. an? Gp [[ no 9 f ,,ms r ` 04- ✓Yl f rA. pl o... c,,r, a A'Ne , b l,-- .fit s s h a ten c. s r�r.�r -- r- evv. --� ac-hn. 4 1-. jr- s w rl t �.v •� Kel. P yv J Ga.✓v - ,4' , J J 4- c t meat „v x.1 ze- �f - 11, -- Ln , , o r : -:, 04.. s A•a.na-. sc O r c 44411 :.`5� • 1-14 di9-E Tra. I A `• re.vTrQA.cu • Al 01-J +7o t--NG.✓'1 4- :4- x'32_ prA -S GJ ( 1 �1�J1.41L' LGIL- okr cue -c./ ;1.•c_ F te- , cmg-c =cam y 1,.J4A.evt— cJ S mac, rin • 'T�.c.. A 7 A420 rz / wv v! c 5 .rt c_c.... ' 4- l d 12 / ) o -1 cos aetr L 4-v e.,e1 v c (- )C e..e.e.A • /VJ i7? G�G� I CA, ere, �✓l C-c7 d ` t�c a �� r`a- r g .". o' - Pv1o(rc- c ex- v A.? 47 & ka &__ c 5r - e..1 v c✓� cv-. s�..e.1 --Y ��,r� ► -5 a- 13i- 4 vl. rnetc-1 p MGe s 6 O-- 9 O dct s . .- tn.a..tia— o, : r nr'+ •r o r s • Gvviot. fix. r't-c p P�.+..� -k 4. c04)4- 6..n /1 417 Gam_ f 1 a, ,& -q,( 5 i q.Ia . cN'1 T C —C"e‘. G D M Mtn v n < t9� :'ks probtc -e'1 'tee_ 0.1 . G-0.1r rw, U n c-a J nok cam., e.-T nUar ,.. -lam o- cr4OrDac. . � CJG� 4JG-11.f a c' ' I Q10L - L GL. ,L ry — ■ r `a _ _ n G CJ-✓i , 4- / 1 D a ��- 64 1, ,.4 tir+y c - 1 1 2; s ) Jam r g 6(74..oL prOc,C-c= AArN ..et. kV\ vrlole.ktivc.�,Q db c -fbn b e— , yeU Lc 5 tet e- wr.. -. - s, r w ... • 1 w0evee os4-. , 5s , 11- c .t tae_ o A ' - do a .A. U- ` \ eevtZN`2_.- Vn. d G4+ her Tare j O v . I 1- 4•- l ; Ir14.4"0.— G � //ex...) 'p A- w r 1 4 , -J e , � r E - nu.ek -4-) 4-0 4 pew-- (v_L. ► ewer - 4 -4-A.0 f�� ors ? - X w o 0 , 134.)-4.- .)IA 1 eV-- ; c,atrc.e.. LoS A l-46, A,a. Q . .1 �G : !lr . 1 ham. 4 ac>I4 G - va a )2_ 1 -t- Gig-rtao p, "--11- G1 w dot be. -._. C ve. c� ter► c • r a- 1411 . 5 , G_ c-ne.."A- re. ' • .L W 11 r a 4- 1 - 3� vr� Ott-- 7 cry./( k- yr c..ocA.-r.ar - s w ;1) -� 5 -- r\e—s . 1,1 4-L. .�--k Li p04-- cs 4 pta.-t- coo el c . /AA a- o nne_ vn s ; k C9- TE 1 'L . r . J JeN 49( 1. -- , l' e_d e1"S 6 n 'V h Gv . r . ;7/4-• vv f Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 93188 July 30, 1999 2 nd DRAFT FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT Attn: Jim Morrow Director of Public Works Department 206 695 6777; 08/03/99 16:12; jetFax #393;Page 2/6 RE: Peer review of earthwork related documents Foster Ridge Subdivision, Tukwila, WA W- 8722 -01 This is the final report on our peer review of the geotechnical engineering aspects of the Foster Ridge Subdivision. The review is based on the following documents. 1. Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard and Geotechnical Engineering Report, Foster Ridge, Tukwila, Washington for JBMF Consulting Engineer by Associated Earth Sciences, written Feb 13, 1998 and revised November 13, 1998. 2. Memorandum: To Jack Place, Planning manager, From Gary Bamett, P.E. Senior Dated March 12, 1999 regarding Foster Ridge PRD(L97 -0027) 3. Letter to John Friel from Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner, City of Tukwila, on March 17, 1999 regarding L97 -0026 Boundary Line Adjustment, L97 - 0027 Administrative Planning Residential Development. 4. Foster Ridge Preliminary Grading Plan for PRD Administrative Approval, by R.S. Pederson Dated 11/30/98 Sheet Cl of 2. 5. Foster Ridge Preliminary Utility Plan for PRD Administrative Approval, by R.S. Pederson Dated 11/30/98 Sheet C2 of 2. 6. City of Tukwila Municipal code Section 18.45 — Section dealing with geotechnical issues only. We have the following comments: • Every lot on this site has at least one area where the slope is over 20% and is underlain by impermeable soils. This gives every lot a class 3 geologic hazard classification. In addition lots 6, 7 and 8 have slopes of over 40% and at least lot 5 is immediately adjacent to a slope of over 40% and are therefore classified as class 4. If the topography just north of lots 1 through 5 is considered this classification may extend to those lots also. The geotechnical report provides special provisions for fill Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. placement in the class 3 areas and setbacks in the class 4 areas but does not otherwise address the issue. The geotechnical report (page 7 and 8) identifies two mechanisms of potential landslides effecting these lots and goes on to describe the potential and outlines mitigation techniques. In general we concur with these evaluations however we feel that more needs to be done to establish the severity of the problem and assure that the situation is given proper attention. From the information provided it is not evident that it would be prudent to develop lots 1 through 8. In particular we find the following items conspicuously absent. 1. No topographic information has been presented on most of the area to the north of these lots . It is entirely possible and, in our opinion, likely, that there are steep slopes just to the north of these lots, which could impact the stability of these lots.. 2. No stability analyses have been presented in areas to the north, which could effect these lots and perhaps the houses. 3. No discussion has been presented regarding the inherent interdependence between lots 1 through 8 and the lots to the north. All of these lots, and the performance of any construction on them in the past or in the future, are integrally related. The following comments further define these statements. 206 695 6777; 08/03/99 16:12; JetFax #393;Page 3/6 1. With the exception of lots 6, 7 and 8, the geotechnical report considers the risk of shallow slope movements to be moderate. In our opinion this is correct however we feel that solutions to reducing this risk should receive more attention. One issue is drainage. If the subsurface water were controlled, the risk could be reduced and the desirability of the lots could be increased. We recommend that a comprehensive drainage policy and plan be developed as part of the initial planning and construction. The current philosophy seems to be to install whatever drainage is necessary during construction. Since construction will most likely be in the dryer months and the stability problems will be most prevalent in the wetter months, this does not appear to be an adequate solution. 2. The geotechnical report identifies lots 6, 7 and 8, to be at high risk for both shallow and deep- seated sliding. Lots 1 thorough 5 may also be at risk of deep and shallow sliding if the lots immediately to the north are also considered. In our opinion, this situation should be studied in detail prior to planning and construction in this area. 3. Several lots along the north side, in particular lot 6, have the potential of being impacted by construction on the lots to the north. This is a steep hillside and one logical method of construction for the owners to the north would be to excavate back into the hillside. This excavation could•trigger instability either immediately or later. The solution to this situation is not obvious since it involved non -owned property but it is an issue to be considered. Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. 206 695 6777; 08/03/99 16:13; JetFax #393;Page 4/6 4. The reverse of the last statement is also true. If there is a failure on this slope that impacts the landowners to the north it is a near certainty that the failure will be blamed on the Foster Ridge development. The accusation will be made whether or not it is true; and probably even if the lots 6, 7 and 8 are not developed. If the drainage up -slope has been changed such that more water gets to the slope it would be very difficult to say that this did not have anything to do with the failure. Design and construction of a comprehensive drainage plan are critical from this standpoint alone. 5. One solution to avoiding deep - seated stability problems is the one mentioned in the geotechnical report on page 8. That is, to define a setback distance for construction that would avoid damage by a failure. We feel that the setback distance definition should include consideration of the natural slopes and the potential for construction on the down -slope Lots to the north. This has the potential of requiring a setback for all lots 1 though 8. A setback protects the structure but does not address the issue of the yard sliding and the interaction with adjacent properties. • The geotechnical report (page 12) calls for benches and keys under any fills placed on slopes of over 5H to 1V. Every site has at least some areas with surface slopes greater than this. The geotechnical field investigation encountered fill on many sites. It is unlikely that this fill was placed with keys and benches and it is likely that at least some of it was placed on original slopes of greater than 5H to IV. This situated should be addressed. • The geotechnical report (page 12) defines structural fill as "non- organic soil which is acceptable to the engineer ". In addition it must be possible to compact it to 95% of ASTM D1557. Although we see the desirability of leaving this definition somewhat loose at present, we feel it would be prudent to define those materials that would be acceptable under paved areas and buildings ahead of time. If this is not done, there will be a tendency to use on -site soils which are probably unacceptable. • The geotechnical report (page 12) indicates that it may be necessary to place the houses on Lots 6, 7 and 8 on piles and to set them back at least 25 feet from the edge of the bank. It is not clear that enough work has been done in this area to establish either of these two recommendations. We assume the purpose of the deep foundations is to stabil the houses in the event that there is slope movement. However, it is likely that any movement under a house would effect the house regardless of whether the foundation goes trough the moving material or rests on top of it. We recommend that a special study be made and a separate report issued on the foundations for these lots. This comment applies to lots 1 through 5 also if pile foundations are considered on those sites. • At the top of page 14 of the geotechnical report is a section on the location of spread footings. This section should be in with the other spread footing topics. Otherwise it will be missed by anyone not interested in pile foundations. Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. 206 695 6777; 08/03/99 16:13; jetFax #393;Page 5/6 • The retaining wall pressures given in the geotechnical report (page 14) appear reasonable if not slightly conservative for clean granular backfilL However, the specifications for structural fill give the reader the indication that a very fine- grained soil may be used for backfill. If this were the case, these pressures may be quite unconservative. This is particularly true when the drain is placed directly behind the wall. In addition, this section states that the structural fill specified earlier should be used but compacted to 90% of ASTM D1557. One of the controls as to fill quality in the earlier definition is that it must be compacted it to at least 95 %. These two specificatioins are inconsistent. • The geotechnical report (page 15) discussed drainage. This site has several interesting issues, Water was found in the explorations and water would be expected from the geology. There are wetland areas that are to be preserved and not drained and stability issues requiring removal of water. These requirements are contradictory and will require careful consideration, design and construction to satisfy all concerns. It appears that many of the drainage concerns are being left up to the contractor to be decided during construction. We feel that the drainage plan for the whole site should be considered in detail prior to the start of work. There are several guiding rules: 1. Wetlands must remain wet with both surface and subsurface water. 2. In areas where slope stability is of concern, it is necessary to intercept surface and subsurface water to dry out the soils and limit the seepage forces. 3. In areas where slope stability is of concern, it is considered impolite, and a reason for liability, to put water on the downslope neighbor's property. 4. To make yards useable they need to be well drained. At this site, this probably means controlling both surface and subsurface water on most lots. • Flow calculations and specifically how to accomplish drainage are beyond the scope of this review. However, we would like to make the following observations. 1. There does not appear to be any provisions made for roof or yard drains on lots 1, 2, and 6. Since these lots are all above steep slopes that could be subject to sliding involving both these lots and the down -slope lots, it will be necessary to remove surface water from these lots. 2. It is not clear where the footing drains are supposed to discharge. 3. It may be necessary to install yard drains in some areas to keep the yards dry and useable and to limit liability from down -slope owners. It appears that there will be roads along the uphill side of lots 3, 9 and 10. We assume that these roads will have proper drainage, which will keep uphill surface water off these lots. Lots 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 may also have road drainage to benefit them but it is not clear from the plans how efficient the drainage will be. A private road easement could be fairly primitive. Lots 8, 11 and 12 will not have any roads uphill. 4. The only mention of trench drains to intercept subsurface water is in terms of a construction expedient. It is likely that there are springs throughout this area, Sent by: SHANNON & WILSON, INC. 206 695 6777; 08/03/99 16:14; JetTax #393;Page 6/6 particularly during the wet season, and that some of the land is creeping due to excess water during certain times of the year. In our opinion consideration should be given to installing trench drains, perhaps on the uphill side of each lot, as pan of overall site development. At a minimum, provisions should be made for each lot owner to construct such a drain later. • The plans show a utility easement down the steep slope to Macadam Rd. to the north. This slope averages about 2.3 horizontal to 1 vertical. No mention is made regarding the design and construction of these utilities. Although we believe it is possible, we recommend that the city be asked to review detailed plans for this construction prior approval as it has the potential for being a long -term maintenance issue. • We have not seen any reference to determining whether or not the site lies over an abandoned mine. • Section 18.45.080 of the municipal code (E - Areas of Potential Geologic Instability, 5 - Disclosures, Declarations and Covenants) requires a letter from the geotechnical engineer stating that they have reviewed the plans and they are in agreement with the recommendations. We have not seen that letter. Other letters are required but are not of interest to this review. • We would like to emphasize the requirement for continuous observation by a qualified geotechnical engineering' firm during construction. There are numerous areas where a contractor could, even inadvertently, do things that would impair the long -term performance of the site. This is particularly true in the areas of erosion, drainage, stability, retaining structures and filling. We trust that this review meets with your needs. If you have any questions please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Thomas C. Kinney, Ph.D., PE Vice President 6-Lcu - cA.) cAdv-t— rtA) r4-,e— y Oars o MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace, Planning Manager FROM: Gary Barnett, P.E. Senior Engineer - Development DATE: March 12, 1999 SUBJECT: Foster Ridge PRD (L97 -0027) The Public Works Department has reviewed the application documents and has the following comments for resolution prior to preliminary approval: 1. Construction of the utilities at the north portion of the site and through to Macadam Road appear to be in sensitive areas. The applicant shall identify sensitive area constraints and comply with requirements of the Sensitive Area Ordinance for placement of utilities, restoration or relocation outside sensitive areas as directed by the City. Due to sensitive nature of the site, the city shall review and approve utility location and construction methods used to construct the water and sanitary sewer utilities as a joint city /utility district approval for all utility construction for the pr sect. I C 44:x alevrp.A per eDe-Anui-z- 679A rs 2. The applicant shall provide a certificate of water availability from Water District 125. The applicant shall provide a certificate of sewer availablity from Val -Vue Sewer District. These ertificates to be provided prior to preliminary approval. � �wa- S/n/5 Upon resolution of the above items, the Public Works Department recommends approval of the preliminary PRD with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall secure all off -site easements necessary for utilities. The northwest corner with the sanitary sewer, as well as the water and storm drainage connections to Macadam Road, require off -site easements. 2. The easement leading from Macadam Road shall be increased to 20 feet to facilitate maintenance of the two utilities located in that area. 3. The applicant shall design the on -site and off -site improvements to City of Tukwila Public Works Infrastructure Standards and City of Tukwila ordinances. Specific requirements identified in a initial review of the preliminary site improvement drawings by PACE include: a. no rockeries in the right of way b. no rockeries over four feet in height c. no rockeries with a surcharge d. cul-de -sacs have a maximum 8% grade e. storm drainage system shall be designed to King County Surface Water Design Manual or Department of Ecology, whichever is more restrictive g. a complete engineering review will be done after preliminary approval and when an application for Miscellaneous (MI) Permit is made. 6. A geotechnical peer review shall be performed by the City at the applicant's expense prior to MI permit approval. The design shall conform to the specific recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. '5 Gonr.) n 7. A geotechnical engineer retained by the applicant at the applicant's expense, shall be on -site throughout construction. A specific construction monitoring and reporting plan will be developed when infrastructure plans are approved. The applicant shall provide the city, prior to project completion, certification from the applicant's geotechnical engineer that construction has complied with the geotechnical recommendations. 8. The applicant shall post a bond as a condition of the MI permit for clearing, grading, utilities and street construction to ensure compliance with the provisions of the city's Land Altering Ordinance. 9. The shared drive -ways, i.e., the driveway serving Tots 1 and 2 and the driveway serving lots 11 and 12 shall be twenty feet wide. 10. The applicant shall make street widening, shoulder and drainage improvements to South 140th Street west of the project to improve the substandard roadway conditions. This road shall be developed to a paved surface of twenty feet, four foot gravel shoulders and provisions for drainage control. 11. Street frontage improvements to South 140th Street in front of the project shall be improved with 20 feet asphalt, concrete curb and gutter, drainage control and street lighting. No sidewalk is required. 12. The City will accept the storm water system for maintenance and operation via an easement for facilities constructed in the private road way and leading to Macadam Road. All work shall be done to City of Tukwila Public Works standards and recommendations of the geotechnical peer review. A water tight concrete tank is required for stormwater storage due to the sensitive site conditions. cc: Gary Schultz, DCD Jim Morrow, PW Brian Shelton, PW MEMORANDUM City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Nora Gierloff, Associate Planner FROM: Gary Schulz, Urban Environmentalist DATE: March 1, 1999 RE: Foster Ridge - 12/1/98 Plan Submittal (L97 -0026, L -97 -0027, E97- 0013). John W. Rants, Mayor I have reviewed this submittal and have some comments regarding Sensitive Area Ord. (SAO) compliance and other site development standards. There are site grading and stormwater issues that have not been fully addressed. Please refer to my June 23, 1998 Memo for clarification of the following comments. 1) Proposed Lots 9, 11, and 12 have a significant portion of wetland buffer within the lot and residential use is limited by a very small area of lawn adjacent to the wetland buffer. In order to guarantee the protection of the buffer area on the Lot, a fence and signage may be necessary. In my opinion, the buffer area on these Lots will likely be cleared for additional lawn or other use. 2) Proposed Lot 8 also has significant buffer area within it that cannot be reduced. Since this Lot is large it is preferred that the buffer area that cannot be reduced become part of the established wetland Tract 99. 3) The referenced NGPA's (Lots 7 & 8) and (Lots 1 thru 5) should be designated as two separate tracts if the intent is to keep these areas undeveloped for stability, erosion control, and aesthetic reasons. The utility plan, Sheet C2, shows a new sewer line to be constructed through the identified NGPA of Lots 1 thru 5. This construction will have a significant impact on the trees in this area as well as filling and grading for the lots. I recommend that if this utility plan is approved, this area should not be designated as a tract or NGPA. Restoration and tree replacement will be required per the SAO and Tree Regulations (TMC Chapter 18.54). 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Foster Ridge Memo March 1, 1999 Page 2 4) Tract 99 (wetland and wetland buffer) will meet the 20% open space requirement for the PRD permit. 5) The current geotechnical report (AES, Inc - revised 11/13/98) is very comprehensive but does not address the utility installation such as the new sewer line to be constructed on a steep slope area The report indicates that the eastern slope area of the site has a high risk of shallow landslides. This is mentioned on pages 7 and 8. Also, the mitigation section does not guarantee that slope failure can be prevented. The design recommendations include a strong suggestion that houses on proposed Lots 6, 7, & 8 may need to be founded on piers due to the slope instability and off -site modifications to the toe of that slope. Another significant point the report makes is the condition of the upper layer of soil and the fill materials on the site will not be suitable for foundations. This could require a significant amount of excavation and structural fill. Combined with this is a mitigation measure that large -scale clearing should be avoided and occur only during drier periods of the year. Erosion and stability are issues for this site. I recommend that phasing of the development be required and upper slope areas be cleared and constructed prior to clearing the lower, steep slope. 6) A conceptual, wetland buffer enhancement plan was submitted for the project. A final enhancement plan should be submitted for review as soon as the site plan - lots and roadway design is approved. I will recommend that the plan be completely installed prior to final permitting. Please let me know if you have questions or we need to meet on my comments. cc: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Gary Barnett, Senior Engineer John Friel, JBMF Consulting Engineer From: Nora Gierloff To: Gary Schulz, Joanna Spencer Date: 9/10/98 10:40AM Subject: Foster Ridge As I have not heard from you I will be sending out a letter saying that the recent Foster Ridge submittal reflects the changes staff requested at the last meeting. We are still waiting for the drainage, utility and grading plans. DRAFT L98 -0043 Pacific Highway Revitalization Plan Zoning Code Amendments • Pacific Highway Design Manual • Waiver of Standards Process 08/27/98 5:09 PM 4. Miscellaneous Structures. a. Miscellaneous structures shall be designed as an integral part of the architectural concept and landsc.o.e. Materials shall be compatible with buildings, scale shall be appropriate, colors s all be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and structure proportions shall be t scale; b. Screening of s‘ ice yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, shall be accomplished by the us of walls, fencing, planting, berms, or combinations of these. Screening shall be effect ve in winter and summer; c. Mechanical equip ent or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings shall be screened from view. Sc ening shall be designed as an integral part of the architecture (i.e., raised parapets and full enclosed under roof) and landscaping; d. Exterior lighting stalls. ds and fixtures shall be of a design and size consistent with safety, building architecture an adjacent area. Lighting shall be shielded, and restrained in design with no off -site glare spi over. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors shall not be used unless clearly demonstrat.d to be integral to building architecture. (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.60.055 Hotel and motel revie guidelines. In reviewing any application for a hotel 0 r motel, guidelines listed in the "multi - family review guideline" section of this chapter s ' all be used by the BAR in its decision making. (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 1861060 P ificH'h a D in .n :1 In reviewing any application for development suhject to design review within the Pacific Highway study area, (see figure 10,) the design crit ria and guidelines of the Pacific Highway Design Manual. as amended, shall be used the BAR in its decision making. Page 6of6 18.60.070 Action by Board of Architectural Revie A. Approval. Design Review decisions shall be proces d as Type 4 decisions pursuant to TMC 18.108.030. If the BAR approves the propo ed development, a building permit may be issued by the appropriate City official providing all other requirements of the building code and ordinances of the City have been complied with. B. Approval with Conditions. If the BAR approves the proposeil plans with conditions, it may require that such conditions shall be fulfilled prior to the issuance of a building or occupancy permit, where appropriate. C. Denial. The BAR may deny the proposed development plans if the plans do not satisfy the guidelines of this chapter. (Ord. 1770 §35, 1996; Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) ora ler o - oster - Inge = •, • -- D From: Nora Gierloff To: Gary Schulz, Joanna Spencer Date: 9/4/98 3:51 PM Subject: Foster Ridge BLA, APRD Do you have any comments on the latest submittal I routed to you? Please let me know by 9/9 (Wednesday). Thanks, Nora L98 -0043: Pacific Highway Revitilization Plan Amendment Planning Commission Public Hearing October 22, 1998 Chapter 18.24 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL (RC) DISTRICT Sections: 18.24.010 Purpose. 18.24.020 Permitted uses. 18.24.030 Accessory uses. 18.24.040 Conditional uses. 18.24.050 Unclassified uses. 18.24.060 On -site hazardous substances. 18.24.070 Design review. 18.24.080 Basic development standards. 18.24.010 Purpose. This district implements the Regional Commercial Comprehensive P1 designation. It is intended to provide for areas characterized by c • er- cial services, offices, lodging, entertainment, and retail activ' ' s with associated warehousing, and accessory light industrial : - s, along a transportation corridor and intended for high -inte • regional uses. Where the area and streetscape is more resi • - 'al than commercialin Language that explains the intent behind the change to allow residential character, residential or mixed use res • tial is also allowed in order to use in this zone. Succeeding sections describe the standards under which tiro . - '.' - le off •• is, ,it• .•. e n• ••. 'h.1._ • .•.l• it may occur. support the surroundin • mercial district. The zone's standards are intended to pro attractive development, an open and pleasant street appearance, and compatibility with adjacent residential areas. (Ord. 1758 §1(part), 1995) 18.24.020Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted outright within the Regional p:\nwy99uc-du.aoc Page 1 of 9 ATTACHMENT B -2 DRAFT 10/12/98 Date: 15- Jul -98 18:09 From: JOANNA (JOANNA SPENCER) To: NORA Copies -to: JOANNA Subject: Foster Ridge Application -name: MHS Message -id: 6EFOAC3 501 DEDEDE FYI, On 7/14/98 PW received a phone call from Tukw resident, Mr Sy Mork @ (206)243 -1944, who lives down below @ 13700 Macadam Rd & was concerned about the proposed development and storm drainage. He might be calling you soon. I gave him the ph # of the applicant as well. jjs Paes , /6 ra - T I e r4" - M t Pes - rvA f {' Ap Tom - C. �•--� �'�- ►�v'YiTn ne) c..c> vvL2,‘A Date: 24- Jul -97 12:04:04 From: NORA (NORA GIERLOFF) To: JACK Copies -to: JOANNA,STEVE,BRIAN Subject: RE: Project Review Message -id: B444D73301000000 Application -name: MHS >Date: 10- Jul -97 09:50:46 >From: NORA (NORA GIERLOFF) >To: STEVE >Copies -to: BRIAN,JOANNA >Subject: RE: Project Review >Message -id: 76B0C43301000000 >Application -name: MHS »Date: 25- Jun -97 15:13:05 »From: NORA (NORA GIERLOFF) »To: JOANNA »Copies -to: JACK,BRIAN »Subject: Project Review »Message -id: 8135B13301000000 »Application -name: MHS »Joanna- » »I need PW comments on the following projects: »Master Values BLA/Short Plats (routed 6/9, comments due 6/25) » Ymeri Short Plat (routed 6/4, comments due 6/20) »Bronson Short Plat (routed 6/17, comments due 6/25) »Foster Ridge BLA/APRD /SEPA (routed 6/5, comments due 6/26) »Nelson Regrade (routed 5/16, comments due 6/2) »Thanks, Nora >Current status of these projects: >Master Values - met w/Brian and Joanna 7/9, comments not ready, will >meet again 7/15 >Ymeri Short Plat - preliminary approval out 7/3 >Bronson Short Plat - received PW comments, letter out 6/26 >Foster Ridge - no comments have been received, sent notice of >incompleteness without PW comments >Nelson Regrade - received comments 6/30, letter out Update on projects that need PW response: Master Values - received PW comments and sent out correction letter 7/23 Foster Ridge - no comments have been received from PW Caldwell Letter - met w/PW 7/16, need revisions to approval letter Klinker - routed recording documents for fmal signatures 7/16 Home Depot Subdivision - need completeness comments from PW to stay on schedule, deadline was 7/21 Date: 31- Oct -97 16:10:45 From: NORA (NORA GIERLOFF) To: JACK Subject: RE: WHAT IS THE STATUS OF FOSTER RIDGE ? Message -id: 05035A3401000000 Application -name: MHS >Date: 31- Oct -97 15:20:56 >From: JACK (JACK PACE) >To: NORA >Subject: RE: WHAT IS THE STATUS OF FOSTER RIDGE ? >Message -id: 58F7593401000000 >Application -name: MHS »20000 -team- options: * > >242Send -to: JACK »Date: 23- Oct -97 14:55:53 »From: NORA (NORA GIERLOFF) »To: JACK »Subject: RE: WHAT IS THE STATUS OF FOSTER RIDGE ? »Message -id: 79654F3401000000 »Application -name: MHS »20MCB- options: NNYNA » >Date: 23- Oct -97 14:48:33 » >From: JACK (JACK PACE) » >To: NORA »> Subject: WHAT IS THE STATUS OF FOSTER RIDGE ? » >Message -id: C 1634F3401000000 »> Application -name: MHS »> »> » >DO WE NEED TO MEET? WHERE ARE WE IN THE PROCESS ?? »I have routed their response to incompleteness, we need to respond by »the 28th. I think it would be reasonable to declare them complete. »They have not addressed any of the substantive comments we gave them in »September. >WHERE IS OUR RESPONSE? AND WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE SUBSTATIVE >COMMENTS? I sent out the notice of complete application and in it I asked them to submit revisions addressing the substantive comments we gave them on September 8th. The only outstanding issue I see is the wetland buffer reduction problem and Gary said he would get that letter out. r7v r— �2�J� C "- k �c r�c c2 -1 J o ✓4Dn - r•� �` . 6L do C ^e-t 7ze--- Lr\ - +- on 9/t /5 ,2 old Q ✓"� I2c , C-L.) ,c e- ---rJr w/o (--42, 41, ,, 4- �/- 1 rc 4 r i.�) u? " t ad 171 - or S )c)4- 7 w ► () , ,1, l be, � �a - ' Cj J� L' J✓Y\ M2,"-A - S ,Mey...1- off' p.eer- ret.J ;ten 34E7 c s re_6bv trer. �� - r Gloss Z a. In ; �► --e,- FOSTER RIDGE Lot # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Unsuitable Soil Present Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Geologic hazard Class 3 (Slope >20 %) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Class 4 (Slope >40 %) Yes Yes Yes Yes Risk (Shallow Depth) Moderate Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes High Yes Yes Yes Landslide Risks (Deep- seated) Moderate 9 1 7 High 9 1 Yes Yes Yes 5/27/97 Applications received for BLA, SEPA, APRD 6/5/97 Routed to PW, Fire for completeness and comments 6/17/97 Declared incomplete, still need PW comments Apps will expire on 9 /15 /97unless resubmittal is made 9/8/97 Met with applicants, gave them a list of issues to address 9/10/97 Request for extension received from applicants 9/11/97 Granted extension to 10/15/97 10/15/97 Resubmittal received and routed 10/28/97 Declared complete, they still need to address 9/8 substantive comments 11/10/97 Gary S. sent letter regarding buffer calculation in sloping areas 3/26/98 Sent expiration letter for 4/30 sunset date, extended to 5/29 per request 6/3/98 New site plans submitted, routed for comment by 6/24, follow up email to PW 6/29 7/7/1998 Meeting with applicant, staff, discussed layout, buffer issues, SEPA revisions 8/12/1998 Resubmittal showing revised layout 9/10/1998 City sent letter approving revisions, still waiting for civil, drainage, grading, geotech 12/1/1998 Received preliminary engineering drawings, routed to PW, Fire, Gary S. 12/4/1998 Nick called PACE directly with Fire comments 12/21/1998 Asked for comments from PW on engineering drawings 1/6/1999 Received revised geotech report, routed 1/26/1999 Met w /John Friel, Dick Pedersen, explained that we were waiting for engineering review 3/8/1999 Issued SEPA MDNS 3/17/1999 Sent comment letter on civil drawings 3/30/1999 Nora, Gary S. and Gary B. met w /John Friel and Dick Pederson re comments on drawings 5/11/1999 Received and routed revised site plan responding to issues in 3/17 letter 5/19/1999 Received and routed revised grading and utility plans 8/9/1999 Completed Peer Review Report Received 8/18/1999 Jim M., Nora met w /John Friel about results of peer review - unsuitable soil covers the site up to 8' deep, surface water flows though proposed lot 3, ground water found in all test pits, slope movement and landslide risk is considered moderate to high. 8/31/99 Jim M. met w /Dick Pederson and John Friel 9/30/99 PW staff met with geotechnical engineer 10/14/99 Jim M., John McFarland, Jack Pace met w /Dick Pederson, John Friel and geotech Jan. 2000 Jim M. met w /John Friel Feb. 2000 Jim M. met w /John Friel and geotechs 3/2/00 Nora, Gary S., Fire Marshal and Jim M. met w /John Friel, Dick Pederson Phil Cheesman and Gary Flowers re fire access, frontal improvements for S. 140th St., wetland hydrology and slope stability. 3/7/00 Revised 6 lot layout (cul -de -sac with easement to 5 & 6) submitted, routed 6/12/00 Letter and revised site plan sent from Friel to Jim M. 7/19/00 Letter from Jim M. to Friel stating that the issues with unsuitable fill, surface and ground water, slope stability and site access remain to be resolved. 10/17/00 Applicants met with Jack, Jim M., John McFarland to discuss revised 6 lot layout, outstanding requirements for grading, utility and stormwater management plans; storm drainage easement; updated geotech report; and driveway easements 1/4/01 Revised layout (hammerhead) faxed in for comment, I routed to PW, Fire for comments Review Weeks 0 Q a. Foster Ridge Timeline 3/21/00 Jack Pace, John McFarland met w /John Friel re progress on a storm drainage easement, the possibility of the City educational use of the wetland tract and drainage onto the site. Friel committed to resubmit the missing items by June 1st. 6/11/01 Letter sent asking Friel when the items would be submitted 7/2/01 Response from Friel that difficulties in obtaining a drainage easement were delaying progress on engineering issues 11/2/01 Letter from Nora stating that the file would be closed due to inactivity if the requested information was not submitted by 11/30/01. 11/19/01 Letter from Friel explaining the difficulties in obtaining a stormwater easement 12/10/01 Letter from Friel stating that a storm drainage easement agreement had been reached with the owner of lot 18. 1/25/02 Letter from Friel stating that the water problems on the site are primarily due to runoff from City streets and therefore Tukwila should participate in the stormwater management system. 5/29/02 Letter from Karen Willie, applicant's attorney, requesting a meeting to discuss a resolution to storm drainage issues. 6/18/02 Letter from Jim M. to Friel stating that the issues with unsuitable fill, surface and ground water, slope stability and site access remain to be resolved and setting a 30 day deadline for resubmittal. 6/21/02 Letter from Karen Willie, applicant's attomey, requesting a meeting to discuss a resolution to storm drainage issues. 7/11/02 Meeting with applicant, staff, discussed layout, site stability and storm drainage issues. 9/4/02 Letter from Nora outlining the issues that remain with stability, surface and groundwater, site access, construction observation and covenants. 10/7/02 Letter from Applicant asking that a determination be made on the 6 lot layout prior to any further engineering requirements, routed to PW for review 10/18/02 Preliminary approval letter issued for the 6 lot design 10/16/03 Request for 6 month extension granted, approval to expire 4/18/04 11/7/03 Permit for grading and infrastructure submitted to the City, PW03 -106 11/18/03 Planning denied PW permit due to tree permit and winter construction issues, other departments also had issues 12/8/03 Request for 1 year extension denied, BLAs are only eligible for 6 month extensions 2/12/04 Correction letter for PW Permit sent, denials by Planning, PW, Building 4/28/04 Applicants notified that L97 -0026 Boundary Line Adjustment and L97 -0027 Administrative Planned Residential Development had expired 6/1/04 Applicant submitted new BLA and APRD permits 06/07/2004 New permits, L04 -033 Boundary Line Adjustment L04 -032 Administrative Planned Residential Development, declared complete 06/18/2004 SEPA addendum issued on 6 lot proposal 06/22/2004 Notice of application issued 07/06/2004 Comment period ends 07/29/2004 Notice of Decision /Preliminary Approval issued 09/15/2004 Applicant resubmitted PW permit to clear, grade, install storm drainage, water quality and utilities 11/08/2004 Infrastructure permit denied because it did not reflect preliminary approval conditions for geotech report, tree permit submittal, wetland enhancement and landscape screening CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanQci.tukwila.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT/LOT CONSOLIDATION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: f05/ e` A2/eiffe, 164 /Let Gofso / /C /a fOi LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. racan/ /e4- /y a7` end of S. /39/ 5 Ive ' and at enc./ ot 5. /4o f.'/? 5 f' akeim/ l: S��c / q/ ham a, d aftac,4ecl /'�f of /d 7 ' lot , �o / 'rn kS, �' Quarter: 6 t/ Section: /5 Township: '23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: �C' n. /e ��. , Address: �. ,ox z7 / Evele< / , k/f4. 9J'z Phone: 42!5 — 77/ 3c?9Z FAX: 4/Z5- E -mail: ✓6i1/ i c`/e'5e`v 'i e-o1-14 /l L/■ Date: 5420 . Signature: G: APPHANLLANDUSE.APP1BLAAP.doc, 09/11/03 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P- BLA/LC Planner: File Number: 4_ , �3 �� Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: 7Q? g q _ 03g Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: � , _App ., CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplanQci.tukwila.wa.us BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT/LOT CONSOLIDATION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: f05/ e` A2/eiffe, 164 /Let Gofso / /C /a fOi LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. racan/ /e4- /y a7` end of S. /39/ 5 Ive ' and at enc./ ot 5. /4o f.'/? 5 f' akeim/ l: S��c / q/ ham a, d aftac,4ecl /'�f of /d 7 ' lot , �o / 'rn kS, �' Quarter: 6 t/ Section: /5 Township: '23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: �C' n. /e ��. , Address: �. ,ox z7 / Evele< / , k/f4. 9J'z Phone: 42!5 — 77/ 3c?9Z FAX: 4/Z5- E -mail: ✓6i1/ i c`/e'5e`v 'i e-o1-14 /l L/■ Date: 5420 . Signature: G: APPHANLLANDUSE.APP1BLAAP.doc, 09/11/03 CITY OF TUKWILA AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND HOLD HARMLESS PERMISSION TO ENTER PROPERTY STATE OF WASHINGTON u COUNTY OF KING The undersigned being duly sworn and upon oath states as follows: 1. I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. 2. All statements contained in the applications have been prepared by me or my agents and are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 3. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. 4. Owner grants the City, its employees, agents, engineers, contractors or other representatives the right to enter upon Owner's real property, located at for the purpose of application review, for the limited time necessary to complete that purpose. 5. Owner agrees to hold the City harmless for any loss or damage to persons or property occurring on the private property during the City's entry upon the property, unless the loss or damage is the result of the sole negligence of the City. 6. The City shall, at its discretion , cancel the application without refund of fees, if the applicant does not respond to specific requests for items on the "Complete Application Checklist" within ninety (90) days. EXECUTED at (city), (state), on , 20 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME ON THIS Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E - mail: tukplan@ci.tukwila.wa.us (Print Name) (Address) (Phone Number) (Signature) On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. DAY OF 20 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My Commission expires on Check items'= 'submitte awith '- applica Infor mation Required. Mayb waived in. unusual Vases, upon approval 0!b Publi Forks r and P lannin g , f f t APPLICATION MATERIALS: ✓ 1. Application Checklist (1 copy) indicating items submitted with application. v 2. Completed Application Form and drawings (4 copies). v 3. One set of all plans reduced to 8 1/2" by 11 ". 4. Application Fee — BLA in LDR $250, other zones $450 -- Lot Consolidation in LDR $75, other zones $150 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: 5. Vicinity Map with site location. 1- 6. Clearly establish status as legal lot(s) of record (per TMC Title 17 and RCW Chapter 58.17), showing all known easements and encumbrances. 7. Provide any required maintenance agreements, easements or gther documents ready for ' recording .Sec /loft o/7 /21 Q, — .vi // do /pro v 1 Co " Ccoj- d /VM 8. Provide King County Health Department approval if there are any septic systems on site. Items 9 through 11 NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant lots .. 9. Document sewer and water availability if provided by other than the City of Tukwila. 10. Technical Information Report (TIR) including feasibility analysis per King County Surface Water Design Manual (KCSWDM). For additional guidance contact Public Works. ,.._____Ll. Provide sensitive area studies as needed per Tukwila's Sensitive Area Ordinance (TMC _ 18.45) for example wetland or, geotechnical reports. RECORDING DOCUMENT: a template is available from the City in AutoCAD format 12 (a) The recording document must meet the King County Assessor's recording format requirements (letter, legal or record of survey format). (b) Drawing must include a graphic scale, space for the City of Tukwila file number and north arrow. It shall include the elements listed at TMC 17.08.030 B. (c) Provide legal descriptions of all lots before and after the proposed changes. (d) The recording documents must include signature blocks for the owner(s), Short Subdivision Committee, Assessor, and Recorder. COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing b 4e Public Works Department and the Department of Community Development. Please contact each Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived, or should be submitted at a later date for use at the public hearing (e.g. colored renderings). Application review will not begin until it is determined to be complete. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. The initial application materials allow starting project review and vesting the applicant's rights. However, they in no way limit the City's ability to require additional information as needed to establish consistency with development standards. City staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206 - 431 -3670 (Department of Community Development) and 206 - 433 -0179 (Department of Public Works). G:WPPHANLLANDUSE.APKBLAAP.doc, 08/20/03 hec apl �� items ;. P � � icnton y& , nfor xa on It utred. ayb w aived in un us u a casex„k 'r t v� f r h P I t k .s d ,., - S� f� ' K � �'`."'� 4 � J�� x � � R ww c� .+ �SRE �`� "��,R 5�e2 � 2 "'�P�,� 2 '� 4` a n� T, 4 ✓4 3 �' � £ _ y ; � I'��.d � �� j. y , y ;c' S fi'�� ✓zg:? N � PA ° h ,� � � � - E Z y $ 4� S.. �� * � L .�" A ib; r ., _,. � x :, _ . i .,3 ✓ < , r # .,, _, _ fi Y (e) Existing and proposed lot lines shall be shown solid with new lines called out and lot lines to be removed shall be shown dashed. (f) Show existing and proposed utility easements (water, sewer, septic drainfields, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). i- - (g) List total lot area and average width of each proposed residential lot. (h) Dash in required setback distances from all parcel lot lines. (i) Show any required fire access lanes and turn- arounds per Fire Department standards. "1" (j) Show the location and distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. SENSITIVE AREAS PLAN: NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant Tots 13 (a) Location of all sensitive areas (e.g. streams, wetlands, slopes over 20 %, coal mine areas and important geological and archaeological sites). For stream frontage provide existing and proposed top of stream bank, stream bank toe, stream mean high water mark, and base flood elevation (i.e., 100 yr. flood). Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". ir (b) Location of all required sensitive area buffers, setbacks tracts and protection measures. (c) Show all trees over 4" caliper, indicating those to be retained. .5 sife fian p! (d) Show proposed lot and tract lines. , CIVIL PLANS: NOT required for lot consolidations or BLAs without vacant lots 14 (a) Include a graphic scale and north arrow. Maximum sheet size 24" x 36 ". Y (b) Vertical datum NAVD 1988 and horizontal datum NAD 83/91. Conversion calculations to NGVD 1929, if in a flood zone or flood -prone area. ✓ (c) Existing and proposed utility easements and improvements, on site and in street (water, sewer, power, natural gas, telephone, cable). Schematic designs to be provided regardless of purveyor (e.g. site line size, location, and size of public main). No capacity calcs, invert depth, valve locations or the like are needed. . v (d) Storm drainage design at least 90% complete, which meets the TIR and KCSWDM. Call out total existing and proposed impervious surface in square feet. Include all storm drainage conveyance systems, water quality features, detention structures, maintenance access and safety features. (e) Locate the nearest existing hydrant and all proposed hydrants. �- NA (f) Show the 100 yr. flood plain boundary and elevation as shown on FEMA maps. N A (g) Plan, profile and cross - section for any right - - way improvements. (h) Show planned access to lots, driveways, fire access lanes and turn- arounds. (i) Show the location and distance to proposed property lines of all existing structures, indicating those to be removed. -- (j) Show proposed lot and tract lines. Total existing lots prior to lot consolidation. Total lots in this Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. Total acres in Boundary Line Adjustment/Lot Consolidation. G:WPPHANLLANDUSE.APPIBLAAP.doc, 08/20103 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT REQUIRED INFORMATION CITY OF TUKWILA Department._.` Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OR LOT CONSOLIDATION (P -B LA) APPLICATION . STAFF USE ONLY— Race pt Number: CI Application Complete `(Dat C7 Application Incomplete (Dat Fife Number Lct Project File Other File Other File • • PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: , FOSTER RIDGE (AKA HELLWIG'S ADD) B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: (give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection; if proposal applies to several properties, list the streets bounding the area.) ADDRESS: Access to property at S 139th St & 46th Ave. S ASSESORS PARCEL NO.: 322920 0100 04 + others Quarter. GL 1 Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: John B. Friel ADDREss: P 0 Box 27; Everett, WA. 98206 PHONE: (360) 659 -4774 � ��` Q SIGNATURE: #. r2ewA DATE: F47J9 7 BLAAP.DOC 8/5/96 RECEIVED MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .FFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP DECLARATION: Know all men by these presents that we, the undersigned, owner(s) in fee simple and /or contract^ purchaser(s) of the land herein described do hereby make an application for a boundary line ad- justment /lot consolidation thereof. The undersigned further declare that the attached map is the graphic representation of said boundary line adjustment /lot consolidation and the same is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the owner(s). In witness -w-he :zf STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT % set our hands and seals. N .. ..%�•,., f�� Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: Name: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of King On this day personally appeared before me KtC ka4 d S. PcIerse4'i to me known to be the individual clpscribed in and who executed the within and foregoing in- strument, and acknowledge that 1 1-C signed the same as h S free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this `'1 day of RECEIVED 2 U ,19 9(o. Notary Pu lic i d for the State of Washington, Q - l - / 1Cv residing at Oh this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing in- strument, and acknowledge that signed the same as free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of ,19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Page of 7805161076 RECEI\ MAY 27 1 COMMUN DEVELOPN • 1 1 1 i ( L c O CO • GRANTORS, Gladys E. Davis LOT 1 THROUGH 7 BLK 2 •.O HELLWIGS ADD TO FOSTER UNREC .� FOR OF ST ADJ • STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS COUNTY 'OF *KING ULID 8 10 U 2 -14 EAST CNT • C 20817 - 7th P1. S., Seattle, Wa., 48148 • For and in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grants and conveys to GRANTEES, VAL VUE SEWER DISTRICT, King County, Wash- ington, a Municipal Corporation, an easement and right -of -way, over, across, along, through, and under the following described property situated in King County, Washington, to wit: 3 7.2):170 . 0 4 0 WE O� 0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 180 FEET OF r-' THE FOLLOWING: For the.'purpose•of constructing', installing,: reconatructing,..rep.ac- ing, repairing, maintaining and operating a sewer•pipeline and lines - and •all.necessary.connections.and appurtenances thereto, together with the right of ingress_ thereto and••egress therefrom for the pur - pose of enjoying the easement, and granting to-Grantees and to those acting under for Granteea'.the use of.such additional area . immediately adjacent to the•above as shall be required for. . . the construction of the sewer pipeline or lines in the easement, . such• additional area to be held to a minimum necessary for that fur- • pose,* and immediately after the completion of Abe construction and... installation,• or• any subsequent entry upon • the. easement,• Grantees shall restore the premises as near•as•may be to its condition immed- iately before such construction or entry. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have heieunto set their.hand • this (r, ,day of -14H4 • 19:6 . On this 0 21- day of • S .J •• , ' 19,1$ , •before me • . th'e undersigned, a NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of.Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ghdrA yy5 Ar 73 tome known to be the individuals described in and who executed the foregoing instrument; and acknow- ledged to me that (' , She) signed and sealed the said instrument hs ('"` mss.— U Her) free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. • WITNESS my hand and•official.seal hereto affixed the dey ED and year in this certificate above - . • •i.••',. •',•, ; ti p - • ` 97 1% EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED ' •`• " • • t4 TAR Kin Co. Rcu;rds Divisi:;a Sta E NT By 6 `r Deputy PUBLIC in and for the of Washington, residing at f _. i BLUE RIDGE REALTY, INC March 14th, 1995, City of Tukwila Tukwila, WA 9925 15 avenue northwest, seattle, washington 98117, phone (206) 783 -4414 RE: Application# Dear Sirs, I, Jon B. Beahm, am the free & clear owner of Lots 5 & 6 ,. Block 1, Hellwigs Addition, King County, Washington. I do agree to fully cooperate with this proposed plat development and to join in with my lots as part of the development. We have reached mutual agreement that my lots may also be used for any site retention or utility easements as needed. In return for the joining of my lots to this project, my lot will be fully developed and sold as part of this plat -or, at my option & prior to the sale of any lots in this plat, I shall have option to exchange my lot for any other median valued lot in this plat. I shall not incur any expenses or liabilities as incurred with the development of this plat. I do agree that my lots may be accessed at any time for the purposes of fulfilling any plat requirements such as, but not limited to, surveys, soil testing, tree topping or clearing; with the condition that any clearing be done as per requirements as imposed by the City of Tukwila. You may contact me if you any questions at 783 -4414. Approved as of this date by: Dick Pedersen RECEIVED MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY nrn /Ft r%PMFNT CERTIFICATE OF WATER AVAILABILITY PART A: (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) 11 .. v tL)A i g 'z 04 Agent or Contact Person /Name /Phone: % /an • �v /�� ..ii/ cons-tai .f' a. BdX 27 •• I've, �'�a 9,2" Site Address (Attach map and legal description showing hydrant location & size of main): 1. Owner Name /Address /Phone: `L 2. This certificate is submitted as part of an application for: ❑ Residential Building Permit ❑ Preliminary Plat ❑ Commercial /Industrial Building Permit ❑ Rezone 3. Estimated numbeecif=s$rvice"connections and meter size(s): 4. Vehicular distance from nearest hydrant to the rear of the furthest structure: 2ePo. ft. 5. Minimum needs of development for fire flows: t 50 psi. Source of minimum flow requirement © Fire Marshal ❑ Developer's Engineer ❑ Insurance Underwriter ❑ Utility 6. Area is served by: kG 14/ D g /Z (Utility) Owner /Agent's Signature: PROJECT # 410' 6 rt ❑ Short Subdivision ❑ - Other: 464,7 L,7 4 " gpm at a residual pressure of 20 ❑ City ❑ Other DaVIECE VEf (Reverse side to be completed by water utility and governing jurisdiction) AY 2 7 199 MAY 05!06!94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , PART B: CIO BE COMPLETE %Y WATER UTILITY) 1. The proposed project is located within ! -- ek.w!/A (Cit ount 2. Improvements required to upgrade the water system to bring it into compliance with the utilities' comprehensive plan or to meet the minimum flow require nts of the project befgre connectio • _ �, -� E 1, `i V- v 7 -1 S (3 cci Gi /S?, " JZS' 3. Based upon the improvements listed above, water can be provided and will be available at the site with a flow of ‘ gpm at 20 psi residual for a duration of 2- hours at a velocity of / 7 fps as documented by the attached calculations. I hereby certify that the above information is true and correct. El C . -ry / p6 a. Obi ` Z� ,pl Agen / Phone v_ - By Date 2 ` �7 PART C: (TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNING JURISDICTION) 1. Water Availability - Check one ❑ Acceptable service can be provided to this project. ❑ Acceptable service cannot be provided to this project unless the improvements listed in item #C2 are met. . ❑ System isn't'capabl'e of providing service to this project. 2. Minimum water system improvements: (At least equal to B2 above) Agency /Phone By Date RECEIVED MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Proposed Use: ❑ Residential S.F. ❑ MulitFamily ❑ Commercial ❑ Other APPLICANTS NAME z "B. FCLt ELL PROPERTY ADDRESS OR APPROXIMATE LOCATION =te I3 9 L ' LIVey' J J6 , S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FiDsrem Rtpc.e La-rs La-r 1710m, 17. (Attach map & legal description if necessary) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ SEWER AGENCY INFORMATION 1. a.f Sewer service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR b. S uer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: I (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and /or • Li (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and /or 0 (3) other (describe) 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) a.j The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR b.�_[ The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a.I The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district b.111 or city. OR Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GFC 4 1 6 " b LFC I 5 " 0 1 7 2 1 UNIT TOTAL 1 Cv PSiL her (Subject to change on January 1st) METRO Capacity Charge $750 billed by METRO after connection to sewer system. b. Easement(s): X Required Maybe Required c. Other: I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information iR DIVED This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VAL VUE EWER DISTRICT / /-- /5 9� er, . J. Matelich or Date ector, Steven Fletcher May 27, 1997 MEMO TO: John Jimerson, Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Wa., 98188 FROM: John B. Friel JBMF Consulting Engineer P.O. Box 27 Everett, Wa., 98206 REF: L96 -0058 Boundary Line Adjustment /Lot Consolidation APRD (Administrative approval) & SEPA Checklist Foster Ridge (Lots in Hellwigs Addition) City of Tukwila Dear Mr. Jimerson: In accord with your letter of September 25, 1996, we are enclosing the following information: 1. A second affidavit of ownership showing Mr. Richard S. Pedersen as the owner of the subject property. 2. A complete SEPA submittal for review. 3. A copy of the recorded easement for existing sewer line and this easement space will be expaned to 20' to provide for the water line installation. 4. Enclosed is a copy of letter agreement for providing the easement on existing lots 6 and 7 to Macadam Road. 5. A traffic report update by TSI, Inc. 6. Water availability letter from Water District #125 and sewer availability letter from Val Vue Sewer District. 7. A updated geotech report by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. relative to the soil conditions on the site. In regard to your letter of May 15, 1997, we are including a APRD application for the proposed development of the site in accord with the PRD requirements. We are including a updated application for the BLA in accord with our most recent revised development plan. All other items of the checklist previously submitted would apply. Please note that we are requesting a exception be granted to serve 5 lots on the proposed private road (easement) extension from S. 139th St. Please note that we are providing a turnarround prov oIc E'V ED MAY 2 7 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT and the road is of short length. The other option was to provide access to Lot 9 with a driveway extension of S. 140th St. Please contact my office if you need any additional information or have any questions. Sincerely, /4 oh B. Friel, PE PLS for R.S. Pedersen Parkside Management I40q.vNG RYI4R0 4 pr ?rlq t NIAVAI NF al SEWER tusrRlct' ❑X "CERTIFICATE OF SEWER AVAILABILITY ❑ CERTIFICATE OF SEWER NON - AVAILABILITY ❑ Building Permit g Preliminary Plat or PUD 0 Short Subdivision ❑ Rezone or Other Proposed Use: ❑ Residential S.F. ❑ MulitFamily ❑ Commercial ❑ Other APPLICANTS NAME X01413 6 15. F LI EL PROPERTY ADDRESS OR , 'r- APPROXIMATE LOCATION S t q L `tom G1lt , S. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOS 1 eR R1axoe. Lo - s I T10644. IZ (Attach map & legal description if necessary) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ SEWER AGENCY INFORMATION 1. a.❑ Sewer service will be provided by side sewer connection only to an existing size sewer feet from the site and the sewer system has the capacity to serve the proposed use. OR b. S oer service will require an improvement to the sewer system of: I (1) feet of sewer trunk or lateral to reach the site; and /or ' Li (2) the construction of a collection system on the site; and /or LI (3) other (describe) 2. (Must be completed if 1.b above is checked) a.J The sewer system improvement is in conformance with a County approved sewer comprehensive plan. OR b.L_ The sewer system improvement will require a sewer comprehensive plan amendment. 3. a. The proposed project is within the corporate limits of the district, or has been granted Boundary Review Board approval for extension of service outside the district or city. OR b.Lj Annexation or BRB approval will be necessary to provide service. 4. Service is subject to the following: a. District Connection Charges due prior to connection: GFC 466 LFC gi"COL UNIT TOTAL l9SOt �G2407" (Subject to change on January 1st) METRO Capacity Charge $750 billed by METRO after connection to sewer system. I hereby certify that the above sewer agency information IRESGEIVED This certification shall be valid for one year from date of signature. MAY 2 7 1997 VAL VUE EWER DISTRICT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT b. Easement(s): . (Required _ , Maybe Required c. Other: er, . J. Matelich or ector, Steven Fletcher Date Figure 1 Vicinity Map Pedersen /Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheldon & Associates, Inc. Project #03 -772 June 10, 2003 t 139 - ST. -- � (PA S) • 1 1 1 1 • 1 AJ w • ■ 1%z10 •L ■ 2 5.587 • Bg / `. \ ebb .939 S.F. r -� OPEN 5 A C E \ an4 a .�.� 92 57 s.F s s .‘• Tom `' �-�__ LETI.Arv " S \ •11.107 S.F. \ "� J / � `' r 30 I `\ \ \ \\ ` � \�\ � � � a �� so 0 \ .\ • •\\ • " --- a / \‘‘) r a' r ..- •- -- - - \ \\ o \ �180� � \ \\\ 1\ r: \ 1:t `\\�\ \ 'w°\\\( \� ) \\ ‘‘`‘r i c i t ( \ \S \ • • \_ I N o '9 ` � : N \ • \\ ` •\ % \ • \ \\ % \N`.\\,,`\\;, 1, N • \\ • k \‘ •.\\ 0 \‘ \ •`\ \ �\ \` \ ry H Jam..-45._ _ erne• ` v v -r f Pedersen/Foster Ridge Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Project #03 -772 / Figure 2 Site Map Sheldon & Associates, Inc. June 10, 2003 / / ...UN .1... ,� / 1 L �� % u L_��.•1 _. -- �_ 1 j 11)t 1'ill t t o s 0% \ c 22 � f 1 *A 1`1 o 1 t Z5' PLANTING SCHEME FOR CLOSED CANOPY AREA (Approx. 1800 -2000 sq. ft.) Z5 � Trees: qty 12 trees Thuja plicate — western red cedar Tsuga heterophylla — western hemlock Planting Scheme for entire area 185 shrubs @ average spacing of 3-4' on center 30 trees @ average spacing of 8' on center Species List for example 625 sq. ft area shown Shrubs: qty 60 shrubs Crataegus douglasii — Douglas hawthome Oemlaria cerasiformis — Indian plum Rosa nutkana — Nootka rose Rubus spectabilis — salmonberry Salix scouleriana — Scouler willow Sambucus racemosa — red elderberry Symphoricarpos albus — snowberry LEGEND 10% qty = 6 10% qty = 6 20% qty = 12 20% qty =12 10 %qty =6 10% qty = 6 20% qty. = 12 Subtotal = 60 60% qty = 7 40% qty = 5 Subtotal =12 Closed canopy area constitutes the majority of the buffer that is to be enhanced. Cluster plantings in groups of same species. Rose and snowberry are to be planted densely in one or two thickets at 2 -3' spacing, while larger shrubs, are spaced more widely 3 -6' on center as shown. Conifers are to be planted in groups with spacing ranging from 6 -12' on center. cedar hemlock PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 1 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 0 H 1 willow salmonberry elderberry hawthome Indian plum rose /snowberry Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE 1204 Seattle. WA 98105 Ph 206-522-1214 • Fx 206- 522 -3507 Wetland a Environmental Consultants PLANTING SCHEME FOR OPEN CANOPY AREA (Approx. 600 sq. ft.) 25 ' Planting Scheme for entire area 100 shrubs @ average spacing of 2 -3' on center 12 trees @ average spacing of 8' on center Species List for example 625 sq. ft. Shrubs: qty 100 shrubs Rosa nufkana — Nootka rose Rubus parviflorus — thimbleberry Symphoricarpos albus — snowberry Trees: qty 12 trees Pseudotsuga menziesii — Douglas fir area shown 40% qty. = 40 20% qty. = 20 40% qty. = 40 Subtotal = 100 100% qty. = 12 Subtotal =12 LEGEND T Open canopy area is located along the north side of the wetland buffer that is to be enhanced. Rose and snowberry are to be planted densely across the area, with several patches of thimbleberry. Douglas fir are to be planted in groups with spacing ranging from 6 -12' on center. PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 2 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 Douglas fir thimblebeny rose /snowberry Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE 9204 Seattle, WA 98105 Ph 206 - Fx 206.522 - 3507 Wetland & Environmental Consultants Scientific Name Common Name Qty Size Spacing Trees Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas fir 12 2 gal 6 -12' o.c. Thuja plicate western red cedar 18 2 gal 6 -12' o.c. Tsuga heterophylla western hemlock 12 2 gal 6 -12' o.c subtotal 42 Shrubs Crataegus douglasii Douglas hawthome 20 2 gal 3 -6' o.c Oemlaria cerasiformis indian plum 20 2 gal 3 -6' o.c Rosa nutkana Nootka rose 75 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. Rubus parvitirous thimbleberry ' 20 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. Rubus spectabilis salmonberry 40 2 gal 3-4' o.c Salix scouleriana Scouler willow 20 2 gal 3 -6' o.c Sambucus racemosa red elderberry 15 2 gal 4 -6' o.c. Symphoricarpos albus snowberry 75 1 gal 2 -3' o.c. subtotal 285 Total # of plants 327 PLANT SCHEDULE FOR WETLAND BUFFER ENHANCEMENT . Note: Plants must be of local origin (genotype from westem Washington lowland elevation). SITE PREPARATION AND INSTALLATION NOTES 1. Mow all blackberry in planting area to the ground in early -mid summer. Preserve all native shrubs within planting area (limited to half dozen individuals + willow thicket). Do not damage any existing native trees with mowing equipment. Dispose of all plant debris off-site. 2. After 3-4 weeks or when re- sprouting of blackberry occurs, cut sprouts to 3 -6" above ground and dab cut end with glyphosate herbicide. Cut ends should be dabbed within 1 -2 hours of cutting. Herbicide used must be approved for use around aquatic areas — e.g. Rodeo. Herbicide application should ideally be done in late summer (August) when plants are drawing carbohydrate reserves into the root systems. 3. Planting should not be done at the site until at least 6 weeks after herbicide application. Ideal planting time is late fall (Oct -Nov), when plants are dormant. This will minimize transplant shock and the need for immediate watering. 4. Plants should be installed in plant pits at least twice the diameter of the plant container /root ball. Bottom of the planting hole should be scarified. Plant pits should be backtilled with native soil and watered in at the time of planting. Plants should be installed at the same soil depth as they were planted in the pots. Each plant will be planted with one 21 gram slow release fertilizer tablet (Agriform 20 -10 -5 or equivalent — available from Forestry Suppliers Inc.). Each plant will be marked with brightly colored plastic flagging. 5. After plant installation, each plant should be sheet- mulched with a double layer of commercial grade cardboard (e.g appliance boxes). Sheet mulch squares should be approximately 2 -3' x 2 -3' for each plant, and should cover the soil directly over the installed plant. 6. After cardboard has been laid down, the entire planting area will be mulched with mixed arborist chips to a depth of 4 ". This is done to retain soil moisture, add organic material to soil matrix over time, and to combat weeds. Chip mulch should be kept from touching the trunks of installed plants (e.g. keep 1" around entire circumference of trunk clear of chips). Bark mulch or cedar chips are not acceptable substitutions for specified mulch. Total quantity of chips required to mulch planting area to a depth of 4" = 28 cu. yds. (assumes 2500 sq. ft. planting area — adjust amount as needed for differing area). 7. Due to site conditions (partial shade, soil moisture) and extensive mulching, supplemental watering is not anticipated to be necessary. However, site conditions should be monitored carefully in the first year, and a plan or strategy for temporary irrigation should be made at the time of planting in case it is necessary. Supplemental watering is generally 1" of water weekly during the first growing season, tapering to 1/2" weekly the second year. PEDERSEN /FOSTER RIDGE Wetland Buffer Enhancement Plan Sheet 3 of 3 Project #03 -772 June 2003 Sheldon & Associates, Inc. 5031 University Way NE 1204 Seattle, WA 98105 Ph 206- 522.1214 • Fx 206 - 522-3507 Wetland & Environmental Consultants 4524 VED) 4525 20.0' MAMMERICAD & ACCESS ROAD 2110' NAMMERNEA0 & ACCESS ROAD 4526 20.0' EGRESS t GOUTY EASEMD(T LOTS! SEWER EASEMENT 20.0' INGRESS. EGRESS \ & U11LITY EASEMENT LOT 4 • 15.0' WA1ER EASEMENT EX! ER7V 10 Engineering Planning Surveying P.nhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, I nc. no SwM West South 0''M, w 99033 11: (025) 927 -2010 1- 100 -945-9•01' rub ( S2'-M„ ti 8 „ 110NOFRE TE E>T lUIONLA F 2 ) REVISED PER OTY COL11ERiS REN SED P 12 DNRER NEWT EOLR4Rrs PDC [ goo one R.S. F S. 138TH ST. J — .._.. —.. p � C 30 p S. 14QT ST. g A 14 13 �. ' �, . `� 12 / 11 4 N S7 W A POR11CN OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 15. TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. i / i d 10 , % / -- / / 9 / / i i i i 8 / / / / / 6 I / 5 , / / , , , ' / / / / 4 / I / E / / / • Ma DAM / (PALED) / NORTH auto !NMI — INN • s• M MD id' ROAD S . N FILE NUMBER LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS E)OS11NG: A PCR11014 OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1. SECTION 14 101NSNP 23 NORTH. RANGE 4 EAST. W.Y., N KING COUNTY. WASHINGTON. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS& L01S 17 TO 27. NCLUSW. BLOCK 1 AND LO1S 1 TO 7, NC USIVE BL.001 2, 14ELLN0S AOOTION TO FOSTER. ACCOIDNG 10 06 UNRECORDED PLAT TEREOF. TOGETHER N1W VACATED STREETS ADJOINING. AFTER LOT CONSOUDAIION: LOT 1 BOIAOARY UNE ADJUSTMENT L04 -033 CITY OF 1UKVALA LOT CONSOUDATION DATA AREA OF S1E: 127.191 SF (2.92 ACRES) WEILAND AREA: TOTAL WETLAND MEAL 11.107 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA PROPOSER 92.370 SF TOTAL AREA OF KE MD BUFFER 34939 SF LAND USE: ZONE - LOP. MMLLAI LOT SUE' - •500 SF PER MAC EFT. 12/4/95 ALLOWABLE MOM LOT AREA - 0.525 SF AREA OF RIGHT-CIF-WAY PUBLIC - 0 SF 0951600 MATER OF LOTS - 16 PROPOSED NMIBDt OF LOT - 1 WNW LOT 150114 - OPEN SPACE MEAT TOTAL CPO4 SPACE AREA - 92.570 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA PROPOSED - 72.701 OF SITE REAMED OPEN SPADE AREA FOR PRO • 209 - 20.439 S.F. UTILITIES: WATER KOrO n23 SEVER KCSD VAL VUE TELEPHONE CREST POWER A GAS P56 CARE COMCAST OWNER /APPLACANT: CONTACT PERSON: R S "00C PEDERS4/R (OWNER) P.O. 90K 1516 MARYSVLLE. WA, 98270 10- / (360) 659-0906 SCALE: 1 PROJECT SURVEYOR: TOPOGRAPHY • RLETT CONSILINO GKIRIP ( TN 1E00 720 SOWN 333RD STREET SUITE 200 FEDERAL WAY, WA., 98003 TEL / (206) 630 -6202 ant. as,_ JINN 9. FRIEL (SURVEYOR) JEW CONSUL1610 ENGINEER P.O. BM 27 EVERETT. WA., 98206 TEL / (425) 771 -3992 LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE RD94R1ED AS A LAM SRELEYOR BY 798E STATE OF WAWIN07014 DEWY 1FIAT TM RAT IS BASED ON M ACTUAL SURVEY OF 139E LAND DESCRIED HEEIN. COFMUCIED BY ME OR WEER MT S P4NVIBON' THAT T1E DESTMICLS, COURSES AND ANGLES ARE .FROM HEREON OOPoR011.11 AN0 N CONFORMANCE YON 14E REOUNE0ENTS OF DE 91IRCY RECORDING AT 198E 960(16ST CF DEI(pmEa.1E4 N MEN. OF 2004. CER1FICA1E N0. 10740 LRAM W: B.G.Y. OIDGI® L114 J.B.F. [ATM 6/20/05 some 50' LOT CONSOLIDATION (BOUNDdRT IJNE ADJ(ISTYSNIL FOSTER RIDCR (AKA RELLVR: ADDITION) CITY OF TURWILA O.O1 2.4 . igNoVe S. 14.0TH ST. trAWD) k nap o k vm :Am ,••• OtZY•okra: LIVAL DISVIUMIONS: =Sri A POR11011 Or 004211001T LOT 1. IMMO IA 1011141/0 25 NOM RAMC 4 MST, MM. IN IMO COUNTY. 10010101011. 029011002 MILC4Ak LOTS 17 10 27. 110.0914. NOM 1 MID L0111 1 10 1 INCUMMT. KOCK 2. mammal ADDITICN 10 FC2T ammo* TO Mt 1INFECONDE0 PLAT THERM. TODEMIN 2011 WOOED MMOMINO '.... . MeteAD44rif ROAD r -....., Ovhea) -.... . . • "-- • . 1 . y MTN MA: LOTS 1 TO AND MACT 2* 02 MUMMY 1.1111 AINUMINT1T/tOT CCOMOLNIA11011 AS MR1111 MOND or WNW. 1110211471 11101 AND IMMO? 10 MOM= AS MA MIL ORMINOS P7 2002 MO AS MMITMED 27144102! OF TJMOUL / • •O UTILITIES: wAyvt SEVO2 tr3.3:ENONR POWIR & GM: 44 sa 137711 sr"' POSTER RIDGE SITE SO. 139 01". SO' iSaIS SO. MOTH ST. Petnet Vomit 111101 o so. 144r144?!! rs= Mem raw' VICINITY MAP tv43;43 #22$ KCSO VAI. OAST OWNER/APPLACANT: ;3. K7." PEDERSEN r,C*NER) P.:1. COX :4313 3.0*7riv3.1.E. WS... *6270 CAO) 659-080:23 PROJECT SURVEYOR: ovsn TOKKAA:atiY OrRIN:AV) SARRETX <XTAJP rtAirrtr: TECH) Sf.m.Mi 4af, 34,:w ?Et f (20.4) .4,1e-t2o2 meta Om Imam In ohmat oft CM Onmlno Plm Moto by PAC& MN Noy 2004 CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT (BLA) DA? A SME: 17/.196 (2.:* A)) 4,nr..A.n0 AM: TOTAL vcriAtts e•Mt. . 11,gr MITA. OPEN SPACE IOWA trAi•Rif,V.L1 92. *fom. Am 01 xi:MAN:3 Ev.3:13t S.F. LARD OE: MsivtgUlt LOT 1.ti tatt, S. PER ttrC DFV. :2./4/fat ALLOWAME :MOAN 1.0: MCA :0 0420 SF AREA Oit A:(3:1T-01-WAY $7,81,4 43 14 EXIVINO ee.630ER Or . 13 Ple.;POSEIr *MC? OF tilt466:3.4 1.0: ram DO' •r Asleoze 141437:1 WIN 'IOTA. OPEN SP.ta. AREA 91,570 7013. DPEN 3PAOE AKA 113e01SED 7270 OF SEM L. MEN EWE AgE.A. KIR PRD. 2c.4 3:6,AX4 '61 CONTACT PERSON ..A)NN 3. FFIEL f„Si3NE!LO73 C:ON'9.11:3:4 ?„ P.O. EMMETT. IVA, i43 7.35 XVI. 0 i423:1 711-4:3J 2. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAN (zor coNsounArzoN) FOSTER RIDGE (iKA mum ADDITION) City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 4313670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E mall: tukpianAtukwila.wa.us FILE NUMBER L04 -033 / / / // 11 // tile'' 6 / // • 8829'0 S 6 s / 1 0 � / , J� < 30' 17 Zcip/i/ / \ \\ L0i 1 (MLA :0:4:0 :31 sl 1p F: I a 7 S. 14QT�i ST. s TPB -- �,�SW GCR Gcv�� LOt / • � — Vi A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M. 13 \-7 12 // / OWNER(S): R. S. DICK PEDERSON ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 1518 CITY/STATEIZIP: MARYSVILLE, WA. 98270 MaCADAM ' ROAD < (PAVED) DRAWN BY BY CHECKED BY JOF FOSTER FIDGE AKA HELLWG ADDITION METHOD OF FIELD TRAVERSE ACCURACY: TRAVERSE CLOSURE AND ANGULAR CLOSURE MEETS OR EXCEEDS WAC 5332- 130 -190 REQUIREMENTS. EQUIPMENT USED LIETZ TPS 705, TOTAL PERFORMANCE STATION BASIS OF BEARING: RECORD OF SURVEY FOR CITY OF TUKWILA (MACADAM ROAD) AR/ 9506209008 LOT CONSOLIDATION DATE ON /016 SCALE / I VOLUME ,2 07 PAGE a �� NORTH SCAtt r-sv I a MM 0 5o too eo JOB NUMBER SHEET 2 2 rUUSOT1 Z y0000.i 80060712900003 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone (206) 4313670 FAX (206) 431-3665 E-mail: tukplanftukwita.wa.us FILE NUMBER L04 -033 DECLARATION Know all men by these present that we, the undersigned, owners) in fee simple of the land herein described do hereby make a lot condolidatlon. The undersigned further declare this lot consolidation to be the graphic representation of said lot consolidation and the same is made with the free consent and In accordance with the desire of the owner(s). In with Nam Name: STATE OF WASHINGTON County of IBne t v /vs 16 ave set our hands and seals. Name: g; G-- YQ.QS\dQN) Name: 'flONN , t ca. On this day personally appeared before me 1-<I CJ\ a rc2 S . I Ir r.YP t- o l to me known to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing Instrument and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and official seal this / day of rc k o, 20 DID Signaturer1 rl !h 0097 PUBLIC 12.24.2006 Name as commissioned: L (- i�. A LO r" Title: lU c9tt17 j P( My appointment expires: t (1I„ STATE OF WASHINGTON County of- Ktngc eitoni n On this day personally appeared before me I)()NA(A 4A • f P ,6(S PA to me known to be the Individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. GIVEN under my hand and oftidal seal this /9 % day of 20(4' Ael Signature.__________________________ Name as commissioned: 2- r< / t/ / Title: k 0 ft1 � .l 1111 e My appointment expires: i,. - (a<-c1()(.s LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I JoA n B. FA ie / , registered as a land surveyor by the State of Washington, certify that this plat is based on an actual survey of the land described herein, conducted by me or under my supervision; that the distances, courses and angles are shown hereon correctly; and that monuments other than those monuments approved for setting at a later date, have been set and lot corners staked on the ground as depicted on the plat. Property Description List LIST OF PARCEL NUMBERS tt LOT BUN TAX ACC 17 1 . 322920- 0090-06 18 1 322920-0110-02 19 1 . 322920- 0120-00 20 - 1 322920-0130-08 21 1 322920-0140-06 22 . 1 322920-0150-03 23 ' 1 322920-0160-01 24 1 322920-0170 -09 25 i_ 322920 0190-07 26 - I - 322920-0190-05 27 1 322920-0200-03 1 2 . 322920-0100 -04 2 2 322920-0210-01 3 2. 322920-0220 -09 4 - 2 - 322920-0230-07 5 2 322920-0240-05 6 2 322920-0250-02 7 2 322920-0260-00 Legal Description (Existing) A portion of government lot 1, section 15, township 23 north, range 4 east, W.M., In King County, Washington, described as follows: Lots 17 to 27, InclusNe, block 1 and Tots 1 to 7, Inclusive, block 2, Hellwig's Addition to Foster, according to the unrecorded plat thereof, together with vacated streets adjoining. Legal Description (After Lot Consolidation) That portion of Govemment Lot 1, Section 15, Township 23 North, Range 4, Wit. In King County Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot 1; thence North 01 30' 53" East for a distance of 30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; thence South 8748' 48" East, parallel with the south line of said Lot 1 for a distance of 317.68 feet; thence North 59 49' 07" East for a distance of 204.79 feet; thence North 29 00'36" West for a distance of 168.40 feet; thence North 82 20' 06" West for a distance of 244.54 feet; thence North 33 26' 06" West for a distance of 141.82 feet; thence South 54 20' 54" West for a distance of 65.26 feet; thence North 88 29' 07" West for a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 01 30' 53 West for a distance of 351.95 feet to the true point of beginning. APPROVALS KING COUNTY FINANCE DIVISION I certify that awproperty s are paid and that a deposit has been made In sufficient amount to pay the taxes for the following ear, that there are no delinquent special essments certified to this office for collection; and that all special assessments on any of the property in dedicated as streets, alleys, or for other public use are paid in full. This day of . 20 King County Treasurer Deputy King County Treasurer KING COUNTY ASSESSORS APPROVAL Examined and / approved by the Department of Assessments this IZ 74- day of �((r,LL , 20010 . / (Vnh(v QAiaLoov King County Assessor n Deputy Assessor Parcel Number(s) ,dot. Ann o X a! 1■t TUKWILA SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE APPROVAL Reviewed and approved by the Short Subdivision Committee and hereby certified for filing this - day of 20 0‘ O iTh (RD Chairpers on \Short Subdivision Com tt > F d SO. 139TH ST. SO. 140TH ST. Lti SO. 137TH ST. -r H 1— 5 FOSTER RIDGE SITE FOSTER SENIOR. HIGH SCHOOL SO. 144TH ST. SCALE: 1".--1000' VICINITY MAP VOLUME .207 PAGE a 1 SURVEY IN 1 /4 OF 114 OF SECTION T. N. R. E. W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON RECORDING CERTIFICATE Filed for record at the request of the City [ C y of Tukwila wila thi day of �U-� 20 0L , at�v minutes pasta P M. and 0 20 Smods p.pa 827 recorded in Volume 7 of PIetS 00 tong County, Washington. OWNER(S)• ADDRESS'_ PHONE CITYISTAT'EILP: R. S. DICK PEDERSON P.O. BOX 1518 360.859.0808 MARYSVILLE, WA. 98270 Qnnl;n-T129 FOSTER FIDGE AKA HELLWIG ADDITION LOT CONSOLIDATION DRAWN BY r CHECKED BY . • DATE SCALE i JOB NUMBER SHEET OF 0 DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR LOTS 9 & 10 ONLY FROM SO. 140TH STREET. (RAVED) I PROPOSED ROAD CRADES ANDIONIES FINISHED ROAD k DRIVEWAY ELEVATION )0( IMICAIES ROAD GUDE it DISTANCE L . is \\\ \ '.\111ill \ t , \ \\ \ \ ...\ ' \\.•,, \ \.11\\ \ . \ , . ‘ \ \I\ 4 I I a ....._: . c: \I .; \ ,•''' ' 2 \-1—k:‘‘'\ , -.4 \;•■ , ---, , • . \ si,.... \ ; .‘...\,,, 1 .---..;N, ,1 . 1 - -N\ \ ‘' ‘• . ' ' / N\ ■.> . : ,, --, I s,\ i t 'se : c `■ : .- I .) l &---1-39TH . 5r , b I — A ,,, , 1 i• 1,, x , (PAVED) ' i 1 'IA t 311_ " 3 137 5. 1 0 • 'N.__ - - • . • • . / • 0 MH M-29 6‘. 0 ■S‘Ns -1 ,,„ / / /// IA /1 . • N 17,, .................r____ (PAVED) 1 1 tCADApt RoAD r----, / 1/1 1 • • / ( / / / / ,... '•-N., — -- . --- ---"— • v'\ ..., ............ \ No . / / / / 2...:::'-• -Os --...„...."--••:,■,, / / / ---;'8"--1----'---- \■. // :::' , i .-. :...: 1 .. ./. -,.___,/-... ---,.._= s .Z.V..-.‘ ..1 I II , I I I I / 1 L.- ....L.". ----. •.7- , L t-7_ 7.... - ,.. 4.:_ 7:10. -- ...=_.....,,,, -- ...,:_.,,z....,..... 2 -- -- - - - ;...........\ ---: .\\,) ...s \ \ / / 6 -- -4- -.... •- -11 - ...-- --_-_-__ . - -....,.z.--::.T.= - -7 , ---:: - .2.7_7 -- ■ .\\\ 1 . \ H. J,, / 1 / • 14.. z... 27 . -7.-------77:: \ \ v i \\\ il ■ .....„,..... • ................ \ 10 ,/ ■ —.` '' I( \: .... . \ ■ \ '' ‘ 1'..2. 1% ....• ■ 1 \ .• t \ „/ ■ ■ ....1 ..." \ ■ ■ .•• ' 1 \II \ \\I \ 1‘1, LECIAL. DESCRIPTION: A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 17 TO 27, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 TO 7, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 2, HELLWIG'S ADDITION TO FOSTER, ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED PLAT THEROF. \ \ \\V K • \0)`‘ • • N \, DATE APRIL 1999 LAND USE: ZONE = LDR, MINIMUM LOT SIZE ALLOWABLE MINIMUM LOT AREA = AREA OF RIGHT—OF—WAY PUBUC EXISTING NUMBER OF LOTS = 18 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BUILDING MINIMUM LOT WIDTH = 50' UTILITIES: WATER SEWER TELEPHONE POWER GAS VICD4ITY MAP CA& r-ioor MH M-30 OWNER/APPUCANT: R. S. - DICK PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 1518 MARYSVILLE, WA., 98270 TEL # (360) 659-0808 APRD KAN & DEVELOPMENT DATA: AREA OF SITE: 127,196 SF (2.92 AC) • WETLAND AREA TOTAL WETLAND AREA = 11,107 SF TOTAL, OPEN SPACE AREA PROPOSED = 39,268 SF TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND BUFFER 28,161 S.F. OPEN SPACE AREA TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA 3= 39,268 SF TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA PROPOSED = 30.67% OF SITE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AREA FOR PRD 0 207. = 25,439 KCWD #125 KCSD VAL VUE USWEST CITY UGHT PSE (WNG) PROJECT SURVEYOR: (FIELD TOPOGRAPHY & BOUNDARY) BARRETT CONSULTING GROUP (EARTH TECH) 720 SOUTH 333RD STREET SUITE 200 FEDERAL WAY, WA., 98003 TEL # (206) 838-6202 PROJECT ENC7NEER/CONTACT PERSON JOHN B. FRIEL JBMF CONSULTING ENGINEER P.O. BOX 27 EVERETT, WA., 98206 TEL # (425) 771-3892 6500 SF PER TMC EFF. 12/4/95 5.525 SF 4,944 SF; PRIVATE — 7,100 SF LOTS = 12 (OMISOD) S.F. RECEIVED PIM' 10 TB CCMMLINITY DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRO ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL FO5TE.R RIDGE tAcA HeLunq ADDITION) CITY or 1111:WIIA 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY • TO BE PROVIDED W/IN 48Th. ROW :FROM '139TH MACADAM RD:, ••••• W / 8. • * • • • , -7 • • - - • • witne NE• s• wmEn5 1 1 • 4sol FAVED •‘ -.? - N. "Z -- -.,_■__ *..- -- --. ---- -- ' '-'---------r*".-'..-:-- -.•:„....--z.......,:::--z-Z....--,-__-_-_--.7.-.." -;.-------- --_-....-_-,-,--...:-- :--- - __ . ............. t ... -1.-:;•-_- - _ - _---z- - - - .-;:----• 7 " . - DRIVEWAY ACCESS • . FOR LOIS 9 & 10 ONLY I > r -• -1 • -,.•• )'^ \ • :‘{ • 1 LEGEND 01 W \ • '\ •, V111)3 1 1.7 7 :STF. • \ WETLAND,y . 1 / e 1111; „I It. •• pROPOSED WATER MAIN • PROPOSEVSEXER UNE ' s.• LECAL Of5CRIP110ii: A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 N RTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., , IN KING couNrr, WASHINGTON,: DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: . • • LOTS 17 TO 27, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1 AND LOTS 1 TO 7. INCLUSIVE, 'BLOCK 2„ HELLWIG'S ADDITION TO FOSTER, ACCORDING TO THE UNRECORDED '.PLAT THEROF. D ,74 0 1T i r T° SEVjl C VSIIN • • ••••• MA FAH IA I Si\ -"I .•\ ..4A. •••••••-•... . - "\. *; • .0 1; ./ • -- \ 1 0 / \ \\11\\\\* / // •/ \\\ , \VI•\‘; • ,•' \ • ' w UTIUTI 11 e5 ATER \ A "' 1.rj, KCWD #125 • SEWER '.• KCSD VAL. VUE • TELEPHONE • . USWEST I \ -•-■.‘•• \AM 1 • I \ \ GAS • .• ..• WCITYNG UGHT „.• lk \_ 140 \ • \ • • . ..„ • PROPOSED STORM DRAIN UNE PROPOSED BUILDING PAD • , \ • '\ • • .\ .. • . . eotimm.eY UNE Arxiusrmemr (BLA) DATA.. • 'AREA OF SITE .127,196 SF (2.92 AC) . TOTAL: WETLAND AREA = 11,347 SF - ' TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA (NG.P.A) PROPOSED = 38,617 SF TOTAL AREA OF WETLAND BUFFER = 27,270 S.F. . ZONE LDR.: MINIMUM LOT SIZE = 6560 • SF PER TMC EFT. 12/4/95 . . ACTUAL ' MINIMUM LOT AREA = . 6500. 'SF . • . AREA • OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PUBLIC = 9,578 SF; PRIVATE = 6,357 SF • EXISTING NUMBER OF LOTS = 18 •• . PROPOSED NUMBER' OF BUILDING LOTS = 11 MEAN LOT : MTH' = 50! NH m_3(1 OWNER/APPLICANTi R. S. 'DICK" PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX 1518 MARYSVILLE, Wk, 98270 TEL # (360) 659-0808 PROJECT SURVEYOIZ: (FIELD .TOPOGRAPHY de ' BOUNDARY) BARRETT CONSULTING GROUP • 720 SOUTH 333RD STREET SUITE 200 . FEDERAL WAY, Wk, .98003 - TEL .# (206) 838-6202 • PRoJecr epolkeeszicomrAcr PERSON W JOHN B. FRIEL . ss • JBMF CONSULTING ENGINEER P.O. BOX 27 SD EVERETT, WA., 98206 TEL # (360) 659-4774 1 EAMES SttO/t7 • 5UPPLE.MENTAL MAP BUILDING SITE DEVELOPMENT AND UTILITY PLAN (BLA — LOT CONSOLIDATION) FO5TECZ RIDqE (AKA HtLUdG ADDMON) • CM TUK.WILA : •DRNEWAY- :ACCESS .FOR LOTS '9 .de 10. ONLY �' '.• :FROM SO. '140TH 'STREET. .1 a— wily? W caw w NEW CONNECT ATER ;• 5 .MH • k t so. ' (PAVED). CBi1 8 r.. — -.._ / . • t' •zo.o WETLAND Lt.CAL OE5 PTiON 2 A'PORTION"'OF GOVERNMENT 1,' SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23'NORTTH,- RANGE, EAST, • W.M IN.KING COUNTY WASHINGTON 'DESCRIBED'AS;FOL.LOWS • COTS T7'T0 >27 INCLUSNE;'.BLOCK 1 €AND LOTS 1 TO 7, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 2 HELLWIG S ADDITION; TO ,FOSTER ACCORDING? TO THE UNRECORDED.. PLAT THEROF PROJECT SURVEYOR: (FIELD TOPOGRAPHY & BOUNDARY) BARRETT CONSULTING GROUP (EARTH TECH) 720 SOUTH 333RD STREET :'SUITE' 200 FEDERAL WAY,. WA., 98003' "' TEL (206) .838 -6202 PROJECT CNQNEER /CONTACT PER50N JOHN B. FRIEL JBMF CONSULTING ENGINEER P.O. BOX 27 ' EVERETT, WA.,' 98206 TEL ;• '(360) 659 -4774 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY TO BE PROVIDED WAN 46TH ROW I FROM 139TH TO MACADAM RD. 1 30 .••••••11.0 • 30 IL — ____ EXISEVC 8'14H 10 744 • 5. 139TH ' S18 .'. (PAVED) MH 10-44 W MH 1A - 27'. EXTEND k CONNECT NEW q , W 111111 r ATER D1 MAIN �) \ • MACADAM RD k SO. 1371N ST s • ss • / \ \ MH M -28 's . • •• RA 4D �� MN 10 11NC W ^M'4J NEW MH /I % • . PAVED) MHO CBS fYSnNC 1p, MAN \ / 1 1 / .. � 1 r — �, MH M -29 • • \ \ / / \ / // / ' •••, \ \ •\ \ WATER SEWER TELEPHONE POWER MH M -30 OWNER /APPLICANT: R. S. DICK PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT P.O. BOX .1518 MARYSVILLE, WA.,' 98270 •TEL, • (360): 659 -0808 KCWD 1125 KCSD VAL VUE USWEST • CITY LIGHT PSE (WNG) • WIDEN S. 14OTH ST. TO 20' A.C. W /4' GRAVEL SHOULDER EACH SIDE WEST OF PROJECT SITE TO 45TH AVE S. (PAVED) FF 922.00- 214.00 160.00 180:00 edge BUFFER w ttOnd • 038 pEN 7 H WETLAND \ ��wetlOnd-ed � �ys�' SIGNAGE / T� T 99 ,✓� T APPROX. LOCATION DOSTING PAVEMENT MATCH EXIST/NO PAVEMENT DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR LOTS 9 & 10 ONLY FROM S0. 140TH STREET. APPROX. LOCATION DOSING PAVEMENT MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT' 13 - 1 2 • \ /. / / / / / / / 10 / / / / / \ / / / / / / / 9 / / / / / / i 8 / N 21(76 y MACAD ROAD (PAVED) 1 r 7 • v \ \ — \\\ 1 \ \\\y( '\ 1 \\ ° \ \ \ � \ \ \ k \\ 11 \\ , , ' \\ 1`•� \ \� ) 2 { \\ .. � \ N \ \ 'moo ` i \ ,' \ _140 - \ N \� GRAPHIC SCALE 30 0 16 SO 60 SO. 137TH SL W SO. 139TH ST. SO. 8 1ICINI7 ' 1 MAP - - MO 0 MH 'NI- 30 ( 28 sal) 1 Iam - 90 wt 'CT FOR CONSTRICTION MAY 1 71999 RECEIVED CDT OF TUKWD,AA MAY 1 9 1999 PERMIT CENTER Call before you 1- 800 - 424 -5555 UK008010 HAWS DsA) I WWI= mpe / m I DESOIED' CAM Duo CAM ma PDC Sw REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS 5/12/99 SBB PDC DATE BY APP Engineering Plevnning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 760 METH STREET SOUTH KD27MND, WA 98099 Plt 1496) 547 -9011 FA:: (we) 547 -6043 R.S. PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT P.O. Box 1518 - Marysville, WA 98270 TEL* 380 -869 -0808 REFERENCE INFORMATION DUO 8000 9.50. CPU FED DATUM: DATE SCALE 11 -30 -98 FOSTER RIDGE PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN FOR PRD ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL .1:6 WISER 89 673.00 DOG NO. 8673CRD -2DYG sET Cl cr 2 ST -+ TH—S T. (PAVED) 2i( DRIVEWAY ACCESS FOR LOTS 9 & 10 ONLY FROM SO. 140TH STREET. EASDIENT 4 - ,D • o \ -- APP S. yo (RAVED) S. laoTH STREET CONREC�TO ` EXISTING , 13 \ N N \\ , / / \ / / 9 / /. / /.. / / APPROX LOCATION 4- a WA DER MA CADAIvt RO (PAVED) / / / / 0 /' 7 / / /� / / t__ t �; �, /1 i' / / ._ _/ `A� u 20 CONNECT TO EX. WATER LINE IN MACADAM ROAD DISCHARGE STORM MO EX. DITCH. WSTALL -RIP -RAP AS ENERGY DISSIPATC6, \\\% �\ \ \ //� \\ / y�\ x \� \so 1 6d 150 `\ / 1 / / / / / \ � \ .\ 1 \ \ \ \\ / \ \\\ 1 \\ 3 2 _ — 140 \ SO. 37114 ST. I c so. 13911i ST. SO to GRAPHIC SCALE 90 0 15 90 IN Mg N MH M•- 30 0 0• ( Ix nor ) 1 Dash - 90 feet 60 gOT FOR CONSTRUCTION MAY 1 71999 POSTER RIDGE SI1E RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWI A MAY 1 9 1999 PERMIT CENTER CaII before you 1 -800- 424 -5555 mooascaa0 wan= OISN 1D 0/0/0l 55)160 CAM CRAM CAM GsaFD PDC STN REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS REVISOR 5/12/99 DATE SBB PDC BY APPD Engineering Planning Surveying Penhallegon Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 SIXTH STREET SOUTH KIRKO.AND, WA 93033 PH: (415) 627 -2014. TAM (426) 627 -6043 R.S. PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT P.O. Box 1518 - Marysville, WA 98270 TEL* 980 -859 -0808 REFERENCE NFORNAPCN FIELD BOO(: SL/RV. CPU FIE DADA DATE 11 - 30 - 98 SCALE 1' =30' • FOSTER RIDGE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR PRD ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL JCR RUDDER 98673.00 DWG NO 6673A11LDWG sIDEEr C2 -. EF 2 8 4 a VICINITY MAP •c.We r-1am GRAPHIC SCALE 0 20 40 80 (INTENT I Inch . 40 test LAND USE IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS TOTAL (ACRES) (ACRES) (ACRES) E70STINC CONDITIONS 0.00 0.78 0.7E DEVELOPED CONDITIONS 0.42 0.3E 0.7E DETENTION DETENTION STORAGE REWIRED: 4,429 CF DETENTION STORAGE PROVIDED: 4.480 CF WATER QUALITY WATER OUAUTY STORAGE REWIRED: WATER WMJTY STORAGE PROVIDED: 1N3WdO13A30 ZOIz 11 nnr 2.395 CF 2.427 CF Call before you 1- 800 - 424 -5555 1121,21021 � re sloe I DE9QED ALB DRANK ALB CMED0D PDC SW REVISION DATE BY APP li Engineering - Planning - Surveying Penhallegoc Associates Consulting Engineers, Inc. 750 SMK 54. South KA1ond. WA 08033 1.10 (475) 827 -2014. 1- 800-445 -8408 7A8: (425) 827 -5043 Kirkland 8.841. • Fedora/ Way CI* Elun . Portland R.S. PEDERSEN PARKSIDE MANAGEMENT PO BOX 1518.MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 REFERENCE NFONARON FELD BOOK: XX –X SUR4. CPU FEE: DATUM: NGVD 1929 SUPPL ANT 1947 DATE JULY 2002 SCALE 1"-40' FOSTER RIDGE SUBDIVISION CONCEPTUAL STORM LAYOUT JC6 NUMBER 98673.00 DWG NO. P8673s01.AWg OfET C -1 or