Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L97-0003 - FORT DENT III - SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENTL97 -0003 FORT DENT III SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT 6860 Fort Dent Way SHORELINE MANAGEMENT - -<�•.. ,...mss"::'-- ...,;5 --;- INSPECTION NO. CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING. DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd, #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 INSPECTION RECORD. Retain a copy with permit "i) RE*4.,. IT NO. L (206)431 -3670 Project: azr pcN r ti-1-¢._E Type of Inspection: BLDei a L AfI1 1_,4 JA Address: (A) &0 T p�-TI1' wy. Date called: /-1— 2 -9 1 Special instructions: �hA,z, l44-t. " ? .vw t - 1,,11 — 000 3 Date wanted: 11 CD '-1 - 1 - 91 p.m. Requester: 4'k l v. q -Ct v� ` e e — • Pone: (1-4-2-g) 5by -Iz9g . Approved per applicable codes. a. Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: Inspector( n Date: �I -1 -91 $47.00 REINSPECTION FEE REQUIRED. Prior to inspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. CaII to schedule reinspection. Receipt No: Date: • iF�.'Y�iF:'4..... '`'.. lz:,. ,•��,, •�, - •r�•N+.- �txy:as ,i,u,;r+ - ..4.. {n 'f - 5 a3:�rc�::�2zrru.4C.��'��F �:L;3;��,��iftN'��: ". �:.tt�ax ydW4il� iif3"'.ei�.1�..'�ln�a .�k'v�t�. a -+'�s� ficktk �k'r'tiyd'�;�.u�a� ,,•la�S$1cxS�, Z Z'. w 6 UO• ww w • 00 g J' D w, z � I— 0: Z H- U 0 SI2; 0 — w ur 1 IL 16 • Z: U) 0 Z April 5, 1999 A rM Ms. Alexa Berlow Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RECEIVED APR 0 7 1999 COMNIY DEVELOPMENT RE: Fort Dent Three Signage Shoreline Permit #L97 -0003 Dear Alexa: We are now in the final stages of construction for Fort Dent Three and have decided to make a slight change in our project signage. In our original design we had proposed a monument sign in the front of Fort Dent Three. Now that the building is up we realize what an expensive waste that would be. Given the location of the building, a monument sign would not be at all visible from the street. Instead we have decided to put the name "Fort Dent Three" on the entry portal (see attached). This location helps lessen any confusion there might be between Fort Dent Two and Fort Dent Three. Hopefully this change will cause no delay in our final inspection scheduled for Friday, April 9. Please don't hesitate to call, Alexa, if we need to do anything further to facilitate this adjustment in our building signage. As always, thank you for your continued help with our project. Sincerely, JO ► C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 04.40 ebecca Davidson cc: Eric Jones Frank Heffernan J1I1lC.1KkJV1CI1 Development Company 2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 454 -6060 PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS January 6, 1999 To: Kelcie Peterson Fr: Alexa Berlow Associate Planner (206) 431 -3673 Re: Fort Dent Three D97 -0395 Revision # 4 The revision submittal has been approved with conditions. The following items must . be submitted within 10 days: 1. Existing and revised parking stall count; 2. Location of new monument sign. (Refer to the Tukwila Sign Code to assure compliance with standard requirements); 3. Elevations showing modifications to the entry canopy on the south side of the building. 4..046" .< . ,;�., FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS Mr. Bob Benedicto Building Division City of Tukwila 6300 South Center Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: REVISION NUMBER FOUR FORT DENT THREE BUILDING 7100 FORT DENT WAY CITY PROJECT NO. D97 -0395 FDG PROJECT NO. 96135.00 Dear Bob: November 25, 1998 The plans attached to this letter are provided for your review and information in an effort to update the City on minor modifications to the project since the permit was issued. In an effort to simplify review of these revisions, we have clouded and delta marked the changes with a Revision Number Four designation dated November 25, 1998. This letter will briefly outline sheet by sheet changes which have been made. CS Cover Sheet N 1 N CO N • :*▪ 47:111.AT:4.: D n 0 m O z r z z Q • :�.z QQw go -n JU; C.) O: Z D W =; Z N w' la O;. D. u) is F- z I-o. z I- .w • The insulation notations have deleted slab perimeter insulation with u_; wall insulation increased to R -13 as discussed on 11/24/98. Z w The site plan has been updated with modifications to the entry plaza I= 1 on the south side of the building (See Drawing SD -1 for details). -' r;. ! r . z _. • ()The parking stall count has been revised as a result of site plan modifications. Civil and landscape consultant contacts have been changed. had, \h • The drawing index has had a structural drawing added. 5 698 PERMIT CENTER Rvis1oo. __ 2- •' S I3 REDMOND, WA 98052 -2433 re- : .i irh}af`i.a. •;•`44.itt •i'. `,`�tfin�;2r.• .ft JSk 'ci;l.%3.7.44,'t'".0 Ri415W "',tkxiAEr'eV."•':i'i�t#��-• Fort Dent Three SD -1 Site Plan 2 NLovember. 25. 1998 ✓� The south entry plaza has been revised to incorporate planted areas and to bring it out to the foot of the parking stalls in this area. • The sprinkler vault and transformer locations are shown on the plan. j/ The sidewalk on the east side of the building has been changed. \(lOUJ '- •— Wkdi -K ek ✓O Compact stalls on the east side of the building against the property line have been adjusted to reflect on site conditions. A monument sign has been added. SD -2 Site Details • Detail 9 has been deleted. A -1 First Floor Plan • The entry plaza has been modified and extended. • C�Q • Corridors reviewed under a previous submittal will be constructed with a gypsum board ceiling and not a suspended ceiling. • Stair No. 1 has been modified to indicate a landing at the bottom of the stairway. • Halfway No. 111 has been widened to 8' -0 ". A -2 Second Floor Plan • Stair No. 1 has been modified to indicate a landing at the bottom of the stairway. • One hour construction has been noted around the mechanical shafts penetrating the second floor. *:`.K-iiu::L 'Frs'iAia Fort Dent Three 3 November 25. 1998 A -3 First Floor Ceiling Plan • A gypsum board ceiling with recessed can Tight fixtures is shown in place of the suspended ceiling previously approved. This change brings the building closer to the look of the Fort Dent One and Two buildings in the interior common spaces. The detail 6/Al2 has also been revised. A -4 Second Floor Ceiling Plan • A horizontal mechanical shaft has been noted and detailed on this drawing. A -5 Elevations The roof top mechanical screen has been expanded to conceal a larger mechanical unit. The entry canopy on the south side of the building has been modified from a standing seam metal roof to a built -up roof with aggregate finish and a dryvit facia on the east and .west sides. A -6 Building Sections Details and sections have been modified to accurately reflect changes to the canopy noted above. A -7 Wall Sections • Wall insulation has been increased to R -13 from R -11 and the slab perimeter insulation has been deleted as discussed on 11/24/98. A -8 Stair Plans - Sections - Elevations • Minor dimensional adjustments have been made on this drawing. A -9 Lobby and Elevator • No changes to this drawing. L+ .,... s3tl°. r, �. 4;: t:•- :�i���w..`ec.%�5:::;S::zrisli:: fi^;:.` M_ •e�:;:s1�#it'iirz:b2:w7:i: ? ^rr^ raw,'" s�; i2tiiiaxti:+ L' 7kLhh '`a:Liisa.;':;,..'hFn".4wsr Z z� w' no • g U • o: U) W1 W =, J ; CO . Wo. F-` g LL Q CO 0 = F W, � o z� Do, io CO poi Wuj` u-o, U Fort Dent Three 4 • November 2.5, 1998 A -10 Roof Plan ��•> Canopy on south of building has been modified as outlined previously. Mechanical screen has been expanded to enclose a larger HVAC unit. A -1 1 Enlarged Restroom Plans /Elevations • No changes to this drawing. A -12 Architectural Details • Detail 6 has been revised to show a hard corridor lid. • Detail 7 has been revised to note 3-1/2" metal studs versus 5-1/2" previously shown. • Details 19 and 20 show the revised canopy construction referenced earlier. A -13 Architectural Details w O: Z �. I-- 0' uj moo,. 10 N' o f—. :w w' • V;. • O' J• The details shown on this sheet are an addition since the previous v _': 0 �. z permit approved document set. A -14 Schedules • Door heights for interior common area doors have been increased from 7' -0" to 8' -0 ". Hardware modifications have resulted as noted on the schedule. S 1 -S8 -A • Revisions shown on these sheets have been made either to support the architectural revisions previously noted or at the request of the contractor /owner as value engineering items. Please contact Ali Kia the structural 'engineer of record at (425)644 -6400 with any questions. 1:- ...,..... 4L..,....:,.n! • ..4 Vie:. .t.... .F",i' elii'J77 't4 ?'''1 •S74M: • at.:1�C?; 9`%h�. ��� �'4v?ti . � mk� Fort Dent Three 5 November 25, 1998 Please call me should any questions arise while you are reviewing these revision. Sincerely, FERRARI DE OUP, P.S. Frank Heffer an, AIA Architect FH1279/III Attachments City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM April4, 1998 To: Brian Shelton, City Engineer Department of Public Works Fr: Jack Pace, Planning Manager Alexa Berlow, Associate Planner Re: Planning Division SEPA Mitigation History for Fort Dent Two And Three As you requested, attached are SEPA documents collected thus far the Fort Dent Two and Three office development, located at 6860 Fort Dent Way. They are as follows: 1. 1997 SEPA Addendum (L97 -0003) - For Fort Dent Three only, based on conditons of BAR approved Nov. 1990. 1990 SEPA Mitigating Conditions (EPIC- 23 -90) for Fort Dent Three - Not used since EPIC already covered by 1988 file. 3. 1990 Interdepartmental Memorandum - From City Engineer to Planning explaining process for determining traffic mitigations in the Southcenter project area, along Interurban Ave. - Not an official decision document. 4. 1988 SEPA DNS Mitigation Measures (EPIC- 27 -88) -For Fort Dent Two and Three 5. 1988 Environmental Checklist completed by John C. Radovich - For Fort Dent Two and Three. Traffic section found on page 16. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 'ekc stBl;'titidAlva •z z: mow; J U- •,UO ' .mow: • w I . w O, J: u-Q` • = w; , • • Z X; • 1- O' z F-: a; •U �: O �I • • '= w; IL- O; • • uiz • U :O~•• • z. • 6. 1979 documents from Short Plat Application (79 -7 -SS) - Submitted by Western Athletic Club. - Includes the following: A. Surveyor's Map B. Proposed new parcels and lot lines C. Meeting Minutes, July 27, 1979, Short Subdivision Committee indicating discussion on traffic improvements D. Meeting Minutes, July 12, 1979, Short Subdivision Committee indicating discussion on traffic analysis E. Letter from applicant to City of Tukwila with reference to traffic information for private easement discussed in Short Subdivision Committee meeting July 5, 1979. F. Meeting Minutes, July 5, 1979, Short Subdivision Committee indicating discussion on traffic information for private easement The documents from 1979 indicate requests for traffic analysis and improvements that were approved by the Short Subdivision Committee, and that they would be reviewed under SEPA to determine impact. However, no traffic mitigations were imposed at that time, nor was any traffic study conducted. •.,. sus.• ymcm :,n�z'mmrartr:r;n++ty^�?s57c =a; ct= �?:�•a^ -,pri a!mnro.a4w..+.,.;. „,,..,.,.........._... 1".4‘ sllfia FEImUA111 DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS • Ms Alexa'Berlow City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW JANUARY 21, 1998 FORT DENT THREE 7100 FORT DENT WAY CITY REFERENCE NO. D97 -0395 FDG PROJECT NO. 96135.00 Dear ME. Berlow: March 30, 1998 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR .. 2 19Y8 PERMIT CENTER The four sets of drawings resubmitted to the City with this letter contain revisions which will,• at your direction, return the entry design scheme of the project to that approved by the Board of Architectural Review in November of 1990. Please contact me with any additional questions or comments on the project. .:Sincerely, { - ek1,4-e( / 12,c • FERRARI'DESI N GROUP, P.S. • ,,itiv, I' t) =====. .C4 1 51)1 idURA -,,t { l J. gedkitlammu'Ima lAill c/iii...4:1=, ce..41..,,, ,,, Frank Heffernan, AIA ' � Cr `f ��A�rchitect Y ARCHITECTS: H. LYNN TAKEUCHI & FRANK HEFFERNAN FH1200/UI Enclosures cc: Rebecca Davidson - JCR Development Eric Jones - Foushee & Associates 12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052-24331 iv�:itEa,3. bi;,'!" AL: ;iji,:w A,11k,liiser : +rP jAti d4re.`,ik,-cWteOttiii=eatUA'. ;tiv.: k'i:AA%'ki ,Z • i~ • � • w • 00. 4.. N 0!, 1n w; ' ,uI X: n~ w 0` u_ <C. =a i._ w • _. Z I=oi ZIP w w. — Oi • • 'w •Z; F-. I— Z.. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW . January2l, 1998 Permit Center From: Alexa Berlow, Associate Planner (206) 431 -3673 RE: Fort Dent Three - D97 -0395 The Planning Division does not approve the building permit submittal for Fort Dent Three. The south building elevation does not reflect the entry design scheme approved by the Board of' Architectural Review on November 1990. • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 3-01-1995 4:05PM FROM JOHN C RADOV ICH DEVE 206 453 9740 P. 1 TO: Alexa Burlow City of Tukwila FROM: Rebecca Davidson JCR Development DATE: January 13, 1998 RE: Fort Dent Three Entry MEMORANDUM j 1;aq 1 The entry design for Fort Dent Three will be the same as the 1990 BAR.- approved design with one exception. We would like to change the roof material from glass to a standing metal seam construction. We believe this roof material will be far easier to maintain over the years and will allow us to use the roof for our color accent. Drawings reflecting this substitution will be delivered to you by Friday, January 16, 1998. jOhnCeRadOVICI1 Development Company 2000- 124th Ave. N.E. B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 454-6060 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.F. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (206) 649 -7000 September 17, 1997 Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company 2000 124th Avenue NE, Suite B -103 Bellevue WA 98005 Dear Ms. Davidson: Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L97 -0003 JOHN C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit # 1997 -NW -40082 The subject Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permit, to construct a two - story, 40,000 square foot office building with associated parking, utilities and landscaping, has been filed with this office by the City of Tukwila on September 15, 1997. The development authorized by the subject permit may NOT begin until the end of the 21 -day appeal period, October 06, 1997. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is NOT appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sincerely, Ann E. Kenny, Shorelands Specialist Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program AEK: aek •SDP.DOC cc: Jack Pace, City of Tukwila Dot4-r -✓t_. .. �...::i<;,,:i 2,is':`r..uGti ;��'. +3�1: •.tile:; . REC 1VFD SET: 1997 C2I:-liviUNITY DEVELOPMENT 0 re 2 JQ.. V 01 N cn w; w=. J E..; w o' J tl.Q. ° I-w Z :0 w w` H w �. ui Z° v 52 0 ,z } City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 12, 1997 Ann E. Kenny Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Water Resource Program Department of Ecology Northwest Region Office - State of Washington 3190 - 160th Avenue S.E. Bellevue, WA 98008 -5452 RE: John C. Radovich Development Company - Fort Dent Three Office Park Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 1997 -NW -40082 City of Tukwila Permit # L97 -0003 Dear Ms. Kenny: :re III' t�; .J U', 0.0 : N CO ILI- .w z � O' zk-; 'V O!: O N. 0 Hi = 01 Enclosed please find the information you requested in your letter of September 9, 1997 concerning the ti t"... O Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 1997 -NW -40082 (City of Tukwila Permit # L97 -0003) to iii z . John C. Radovich Development Company for Fort Dent Three Office Park.. Included is the following: . 0 — .• O. /7 •z 1. The applicant's original application submittal, 2. A set of full size site development plans. I hope this information meets the WAC criteria referenced in your letter for purposes of shoreline permit filing and completeness. Should you need additional information, please contact me directly at (206) 431 -3673 as soon as conveniently possible. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Enclosures 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 .,r..i�e+.c,si�tc;.2'41. • ;t i::.,gtSt.,,.a *, iZ' ,W,, .4�:` �i�i' is�wi} �iaia; ��n�. v. _�ti�:isi�%N= 4�.vi^:'�l:,w:u,.,a STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Northwest Regional Office, 3190 - 160th Ave S.E. • Bellevue, Washington 98008 -5452 • (206) 649 -7000 September 9, 1997 Jack Pace Tukwila Community Development Dep 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Pace: Re: City of Tukwila Permit # L97 -0003 JOHN C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Applicant Shoreline Substantial Development Permit: 1997 -NW -40082 3i/ub S,c4/1",/,‘ h,'L l A,z y Ce411 n(i /c.ei a1 G< «�-- // ! l The referenced Shoreline permit was received by this office on August 22, 1997. Unfortunately, the permit filing+ "" i6ieltid the . following items are needed to complete it: lfzthWilifd Tiation submitted by the applicant or the information required by WAC 173 -27- 180(1) through (4). 2 its' a develoe lil tfeit iiig the requirements of WAC 173 -27 -180 (9). Pursuant to WAC 173 -27- 130(5), the permit is void unless and until the information identified above is received by the Department of Ecology. The list of items required for a complete permit filing is set forth in ,WAC 173 -27 -130. The minimum information required on permit site plans and vicinity maps is set forth in WAC 173 -27 -180. Please send us the needed material on or before September 30, 1997. If we do not receive the needed materials by that date we must return this permit to you. If you would like the Department of Ecology to hold this permit for a longer period to allow the information to be compiled, or if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (206) 649 -7145. Sincerely, Ann E. Kenny, Shoreline Specialist Shorelands and Water Resources Program AEK:aek MOREINFO.DOC RECEIVED CITY OF TuloppLA SE P# 0 f•Tv PERMIT CENTER :z :0 0' o' cOw: w z: .1 I—: • u.1 w0.. u. Q: =w z� I-0' 0 co: 0 t it] H. uJ 1- tu Z: 0 N. D t.., z.... AFFIDAVIT ''/ A mcivitku, fl Notice of Public Hearing fl Notice of Public Meeting LI Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet LI Boardof Appeals Agenda Packet OPlanning Commission Agenda Packet O Short Subdivision Agenda Packet OF DISTRIBUTION hereby declare that: 0 Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit 0Shoreline Management Permit Determination of Non- significance OMitigated Determination of Nonsignificance ODetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice fl Notice of Action 00fficial Notice O Other O Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on • Name of Project bfr0- Signature • File Number 1-191 000 ` • Shor�.4n8 Management Act of 197 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L97-0003 Status: ISSUED Applied: 01/21/1997 Approved: 03/19/1997 Expiration: 08/19/1999 Pursuant to RCW 90'58, a permit is hereby granted to: REBECCA DAVIDSON to undertake the following development: CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY, 40,000 SO FT OFFICE � ac Z. BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING ' ' | w �I ` 0� um �� �m- ..K�' THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA 0F THE GREEN RIVER AND IJS'ASSQCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. . u..<" cog • 3: Z �- C). �-. U • � m� ��--. upon the following property: Address: 7100 FORT DENT WY 295490-0440 24-23-4 Parcel No: Sec/Twn/Rnge: applicable to this development: The following master program provisions are app ' .Y OF 'TKWILA MASTER PROGRAM Development prsuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the attachd'terms and conditions. • This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 an nothin n this p.rm1t shall excuse the applicant, from compliance with any other Federal-State `or local statutes, ordinanuea or regulations applicable this project, but not inconsistent. with the. Shoreline Mmnagement',Aot (Chapter 90'58 RCW). This permit;/may be reso1nded pursuant to RCW• 90'58'140(8) in .the event the permittee fails to''tomply with the terms or conditions hereof' CONSTRUCTIONI.PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR 'IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY-ONE(2l) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF � ECOLOGY AS DEFINED. IN RCW 90'58'140(5) AND WAC 173-14-090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGSINITIATED 'WITHIN TWENTY-ONE {21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90'58'140(5)(a)(b)(o). Date: `� /�7 ���� "/ ~l _��- .~~~_�� - -' ^' Steve Lancaster Director, Planning Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173-14-060' CITY OF TUKWILA Address: 7100 FORT DENT WY Permit No: L97 -0003 Suite: Tenant: FORT DENT III Status: ISSUED Type: P -SHORE Applied: 01/21/1997 Parcel #: 295490 -0440 Issued: 08 /19/1997 * k*:k** k'k* **•k****** k******* k•k **•k•**: **•k k*.k•k************* k *****'k ***:k *•k* *** * **•** Permit Conditions: 1. EXPAND THE ILLIIMINATION PLAN TO SHOW THE EFFECTS OF GLARE ON .THE RIVER ENVIRONMENT 2. PROVIDE AN ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE GREEN. RIVER DIKE FOR KING COUNTY FLOOD,CONTROL.MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTIONS 3. PROVIDE A TWO (2) FOOT WIDE SHOULDER ALONG THE EDGE OF THE TRAIL, PER CITY OF T.UWKILA.TRAIL EASEMENT AGREEMENT, .WITH ALL DESIGN'SPECIFICATIONS FOR FIXTURES, SIGNAGE AND AMENITIES ,COORDINATED WITH TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF PARK'S, AND RECREATION: REDUCE WIDTH (2F COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS TO A MAXIMUM OF 35 FEET,. iyr;:��, «f JK4dv�,:.'t'..r..3✓x ..:;z:o.,d.< s;.Gn3a�4;,4iJ% A+...m..i�_S <ee tixietr "r r�i"�.a4)`; `;* uieYl wrY iir;;Ma t!dS1aCi4;40r,i tee."w s:iwT:ia c+'e 1.i'v: 3 ?..xf`_`s!x?r::n,"*!uYA+stc' h14,} y 91 A F F I D A V I T 5`I�Vl A $»i -L1 fl Notice of Public Hearing JJ Notice of Public Meeting J Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet D Board of Appeals Agenda Packet fl Planning Commission Agenda Packet Q Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: fl Notice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit %Shoreline Management Permit LI Determination of Non - significance ❑ Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance O Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice O Notice of Action 0 Official Notice 0 Other ❑ Other was -aar d to each of the following -6/kg-12, eRA►bo Name of Project ri bf-la .�.0 File Number Lq ! " p00.3 .,v ". � f 14 % =: ...,..,, ......ti.t �.. r�'Pi� un': ��, �,.'' �rd ;.ta�SY�r:�:f3'.�MY�3"z'�'c.." i, r�r'.�'v.+�a'C•;»;r'F:';.r,.,. addresses on Signature ' (-- o\Grnu .vf; ,� .4Sn'a�sV`+�'.FciJF�Cy;ri�: va�'.M.�+ �Sf> 74,.' � .41.�vfS.:�t�S °+:ts`.`rv�ii;'• 25�:�':v:� }...i.. .,�! ":. W.�.. ,h..>G.L. z _ I-' W.. ,LL 2 -J C.) U 0: W w= J HI w0 . GC, N d' _, Z Z~ 0 fO ,0 1--i w' - O. • Z' U 0; z Shoreline Management Act of 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: Status: Applied: Approved: Expiration: L97 -0003 ISSUED 01/21/1997 08/19/1997 08/19/1999 Pursuant to RCW 90.58, a permit is hereby granted to: REBECCA DAVIDSON to undertake the following development: CONSTRUCTION OF A 2 STORY, 40,000 SQ FT OFFICE BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING AND LANDSCAPING upon the following property: Address: 7100 FORT DENT WY Parcel No: 295490 -0440 Sec /Twn /Rnge: 24 -23 -4 THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE WITHIN THE AREA OF THE GREEN RIVER AND ITS ASSOCIATED WETLANDS, WHICH IS A SHORELINE OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE AND IS DESIGNATED AS AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT. The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: CITY OF TUKWILA MASTER PROGRAM Development pursuant to this permit shall be undertaken pursuant to the attached terms and conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 an nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the terms or conditions hereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BEGIN OR IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b) Date: At Ati 16 l_Ig-1 Steve Lancaster Director, Planning Department Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two years from date of issuance, per WAC 173 -14 -060. „ ha. :iug4:r;g4Xii City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Prepared July 31,1997 Project: File Number: Applicant: Owner: Request: Associated Permits: Location: Lot Size: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Zoning District: Staff: Fort Dent Three 1/7 aet97 L-KFC- 084 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit John C. Radovich Development Corporation John C. Radovich Development Corporation To build a two- story, 40,000 square foot office building with associated parking, utilities, landscaping, and amenities. Flood Control Permit Storm Drainage Permit Land Altering Design Review (90- 12 -DR), approved November 1990 SEPA (EPIC #23 -90), approved November 1990 6860 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila 99,760 Square Feet (2.29 Acres) Regional Commercial Mixed Use Regional Commercial Mixed Use (RCMU) Alexa Berlow 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 mau„ rrvr.. R.""' �:' A 8,.,:. "- 7• :e.,.cVV.,,R7:1,.; ?.irr,wt t.'.11,ef.I;. .sACAV.n.Cv.Y,3i. 747AtY:bYt�: �arn:s: Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development Attachments: L96=0084 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three A. Full Set of Plans B. Photographic Rendering C. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Application D. Geotechnical Report (revised) E. Exterior Lighting Specifications Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development FINDINGS L96608M4 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three Background Shoreline master permits were submitted for Fort Dent Three in 1988 and 1990, and withdrawn in 1991. In November 1990, a design review proposal for Fort Dent Three (90- 12 -DR) was approved by the Board of Architectural Review with the condition that access and amenities from the building to the shoreline be provided. A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) (EPIC- 23 -90) was also approved at this time. The proposed development meets current minimum requirements of the Regional Commercial Mixed -Use (RCMU) zoning district. See Applicant's Cover Letter, dated December 20, 1996 confirming minimal changes to building modifications in current shoreline permit application. A Trail Easement Agreement runs with the land adjacent to the river that holds the City responsible for maintaining the trail, from the edge of the private property to the water. Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (18.44.80) Any substantial development within 200 feet of any shoreline must receive a shoreline substantial development permit prior to issuance of any local permits by the City. The proposed Fort Dent Three Office Park is located adjacent to the Green River. A landscape plan, required under 18.44.080, is attached to show specific measures taken to meet shoreline regulations for the river environment (18.44.130). Criteria to meet both general and specific shoreline regulations follow. General Shoreline Regulations (18.44.110) 1. The use is in conformance with the underlying district The proposed office park meets basic development standards of the Regional Commercial Mixed -Use (RCMU) zoning district. The project complies with the following items of municipal and county shoreline policies and regulations: Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Shoreline Design Policies: A -1. The development minimizes impacts on wildlife and significant vegetation, sandbars, wetlands, watercourses, and other important habitat features are maintained through the proper location, construction, and management of shoreline uses; A -2. The development protects riverbank vegetation and, where feasible, restores degraded riverbanks A -4. Streets, flood control, surface water drainage and sewer system projects, clearing /grading activities and landscaping are designed, located, and managed in a ... .... � .. ., ... �.. r ..JClhi...rrrJ.."iKvi:'1iy.S7.� ` 7M3' ICiC. 3. ..�;it�i`ie``tr'.�.�•Erp.Si'!C: 3 w'ic: V;: �.. . ,xJ.'�i�ii.,ix``.;•..�w�kivaK hk? iv- �.. f' a" s��scc* Yv1ii, �' �: aki}` bd5i�drmi+aeh: %ifi(39�i�'a� =ett, a�"'`. ' r..•f�' z re J U' U O: CO 0; U) w. W =: J H w 0: g Q: = d; 'z Z t—. U 0, O N; � Hti =V; . iii z: U =' OF' z Staff Report to the Director, Department of Community Development 617 .bFr L96-0084 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three manner that mninimizes water pollution, provides erosion control, and protects water quality A -S. The proposed development does not appear to cause significant adverse impacts on flooding, erosion, and natural resources in determining and considering the visual impact a commerciaUindustrial development will have on the surrounding area, within and outside of Tukwila's jurisdiction. A -6. Capital improvement projects and private development are designed, located, and managed in a manner which does not endanger public health, safety, welfare, or capacity of river to provide long -term community benefits. A -7. The development is designed and located to minimize impacts to habitat, vegetation, access, recreation, /historical resources and flood control A -12. The development reflects high quality site planning, architecture, and landscaping; and includes setbacks, buffers, height/bulk provisions for open space A -13. Areas included in the Green River Plan: The development provides public access or a private natural area in lieu of physical public access. A16 -a. Access is designed and located approximately in relation to the particular site conditions and private property concerns A16 -b. Access is designed to be safe and convenient, and includes amenities such as benches, drinking fountains, and parking lighting A -17. Where appropriate, the commercial development provides a connection between concentrations of commercial activity and the trail network Tukwila Shoreline Master Program: A -2. Locate commercial/industrial development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public use. A -3. Preferences should be given to commercial and industrial development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. A -4. Determine and consider the visual impact that the commercial/industrial development will have on the surrounding area A -5. Encourage provisions for public access, especially visual and pedestrian, as an integral part of commerciaUindustrial waterfront development BI -b. For non -water dependent economic activities, where permitted, the entire water's edge should be available for public access, consistent with private property rights. B -3. A trail system should be developed along the river. Trails should be developed for linear access through public shoreline areas; access points to and along the river should be linked by a system of trails; The connection of other trails in the region to the shoreline trail system should be encouraged and developed. To assist in developing a trail system, incentives should be offered to property owners for utilizing set back requirements C -2. Parking facilities should be located upland with provisions for adding pedestrian access to the shoreline. D -2. recreational uses should be incorporated with other shoreline activities. F -1. Determine and consider the visual impact a conmhercial/industrial development will have on the surrounding area F -2. Develop regulations requiring the maintenance of a buffer of permanent vegetation between developed areas and associated water bodies to improve the aesthetic qualities of the river, retard surface runoff, maintain constant water temperature, and reduce filtration. F -3. Promote linear shoreline access, especially pedestrian and non- motorized types, in the areas close to population centers. Such areas would also serve as buffers between water and developed areas. 44,J E.: %,;;,,q,>.1' • 4 Z ~w• J U' .0 O' co W WI J • CO LL. CU 01 J u. ¢: •(0 a, I— w. Z Z�. Z 0;. • w U• :O -: W W. W Z W: H H .0 . Z Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development L96r -0084 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three F -4. Develop regulations for site coverage, building height, setbacks, and density to insure visual access to water, promote interesting development, and prevent encroachment over water. F -8. Outfalls and surface run -offs should be controlled to minimize adverse effects on the river A Trail Easement Agreement runs with the land adjacent to the river that holds the City responsible for maintaining the trail, from the edge of the private property to the water. In coordination with the Department of Parks and Recreation, the property owner is responsible for providing appropriate maintenance and safety measures in the buffer zone. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structures protects or promotes the public interest. Accessory facilities, such as picnic tables and benches will be located in the shoreline management environment to promote public interest in the use of the riverfront as a recreational amenity. These amenities will become part of the Green River recreational trail proposed by the City that will extend to Fort Dent Park, located immediately to the north of the proposed office development. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit. The site currently contains mostly grass vegetation, blackberry bushes, and some trees. Trees, shrubs, and grass will be added between the parking lot and trail, including Washington Thorn, Kousa Dogwood, London Plane, Sweet Gum, Rhododendron, New Zealand Flax, Otto - Luyken Laurel, Snow Lady, and White Flowering Potentilla. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Surface storm water will be channeled and collected through an approved bioswale and conveyance swale to the storm system, already in place at Fort Dent II. The system at Fort Dent II is connected to the conveyance system in Southcenter Boulevard, via Fort Dent I, before reaching the Green River. Possible runoff from parking lot areas will be channeled through the biofiltration swales. 6. All States and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with Appropriate measures will be taken to comply with all state and federal water quality regulations. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river shall be protected The Green River serves as a mitigation route for salmon and possibly for trout. In addition, crow, finches, sparrows, robins, and duck have been observed on or near the site. No special measures have been proposed to protect this habitat from development in the shoreline management environment or in the vicinity of the proposed office building. 5 ,..nt +?r'e � >- /d.::.'�'jdd ' �;: sii�tii:: �:, ti: u: �`#: �. usi'.'•. C' t ^`:Sa1�iY�lri)'?i18�asi'+n`x =''� 1'"�'i�tni"t<�'f �4�C''�ii�iv�oli}tf:4ti�«• Sri, 2�s�' iici;' Sil i' �3�'% 7y1' � .�llfuiri:1;.��"r.'ffo'3i�iriY! z i-- Z re w QQ � JU 0 N 0: , Uw w =, 1 J H. N w w O. D. a z �. z0 2 U0 0 1-: w p • z Lb N, 0 H z Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development L966684 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three 8. All perimeters of landfills and other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls, or other satisfactory mechanism for erosion prevention. In 1991, the riverbank was widened and re- vegetated with the development of Fort Dent II as an erosion control measure. No new riverbank widening is predicted by the applicant to be necessary with the development of Fort Dent III. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. A SEPA was approved as a Mitigated DNS in November 1990; Tukwila Design Review was approved in November 1990 with conditions to provide access and amenities from the building to the shoreline; A Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit and a Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit were submitted on December 23, 1996. A Land Altering Permit may be necessary. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements orflood control is prohibited. All dredging occurred as part of the river widening in 1991. Approximately 1,150 cubic yards of material were removed at the time to create a slope and bench intended to allow additional flow capacity in the river. No additional materials will be removed. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline No mining will occur on the site nor along the river shoreline 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the shoreline No solid waste disposal will occur along the shoreline 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner Two separate portions of land adjacent to the trail were dedicated for public use in the original proposal, approved by the Board of Architectural Review in November 1990. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel, unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. No new landfill will occur within the river channel. 15. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Code to the contrary, removal of any cottonwood tree within the river environment, or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. The site is currently spotted with grass, shrubs, and trees. Specific Shoreline Regulations - River Environment (18.44.130) 1. The river environment shall consist of a 40 foot wide management zone as measured on a horizontal plane from the mean high water nark, and shall contain no uses or structures other than the following: a. public and/or private footpaths or trails b. recreational facilities such as benches, tables, viewpoints, and picnic shelters provided no such facility exceeds 15 feet in height U- : :;V:a0:40s 6 F.. W. .6D 0 '0 0 . • `ln W W =! W 0, §a7 J: LL ?. d: = W O F- •no al III'', u. Alf • U= O~ z 1 Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development L96= 6084-Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three c. support facilities for pollution control such as runoff ponds and filter systems provided they are at or below grade d. information and directional signs e. diking or bank stabilization, erosion control, and flood control purposes f. bridges g. fire lanes and dike maintenance roads h. plaza connectors between buildings and dikes not to exceed the height of the dike are permitted for the purpose of providing and enhancing pedestrian access along the river, and for landscaping purposes Strong pedestrian ties between the river side entry from the building to the river trail will be created. A picnic table, benches, and seating in the immediate area of the trail connection, as well as along the length of the river trail, will be introduced. An enhanced landscape plan was approved by the Board of Architectural Review on November 7, 1990. A copy of the landscape plan is attached. See item 2c for further detail on planting. 2. River environment uses shall conform to the following standards: a. access roads, parking or storage areas, the closest edge of which shall be a minimum of 40 feet from the mean high water mark Parking, storage, and access roads are outside the 40 foot river environment management area. Their distance from range from the mean high water mark of the Green River range from 50 to 70 feet. b. the centerline of railroad lead tracks shall be located no closer than 40 feet from the mean high water mark, except where the railroad lead track is bridging the river N/A c. where the riverbank has been reconstructed, it shall be landscaped with suitable plant material consistent wills the flood control measures to include large hardy shade and fruit trees, at maximum 30 feet on center such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash and birch, or other species approved by the Director. In addition, at least one of the following landscape materials shall be used: 1. live groundcover at a maximum of 18 inches on center 2. natural grasses 3. addition to the existing natural vegetation where appropriate In 1991, the riverbank was revegetated with blackberry bushes and trees for the river widening project. In addition, vegetation along the river will be augmented with the following plant materials: 12 Tupelo, 24 Redtwig Dogwood, 12 Spirea, 16 Warminster Broom, and 23 Rosa Rugosa. All proposed plant material will have canopy less than 30 feet. Sod is proposed as groundcover (See attached geotechnical report). d. Facilities such as pumps, pipes, etc. shall be suitably screened with hardy plant material. No above ground storm detention has been proposed. e. Utility easements where necessary shall be landscaped with live groundcover or natural grass cover. See Item C of this section 7 Staff Report to the Director , Department of Community Development Conclusion 1'7 0 co L96=0084 Shoreline Permit Fort Dent Three 1. The impact of glare on habitat in the river environment may be caused by on -site illumination. 2. There is no access easement to the Green River dike for King County flood control inspection and maintenance. 3. The location and design of information and directional signs have not been specified. 4. The maximum width of the commercial driveways proposed exceeds 35 feet. Staff recommends approval of the Type II Shoreline Development Permit for the Fort Dent Three Office Park and associated amenities in the adjacent river environment. Conditions of the decision are attached to this permit. 8 z 6 i to LU • w =; w Or. u. D re. d. �z, z11- 1- 0 W Do o ('. •W wt H ` lL Oj. ;w -.. City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM Date: July 31, 1997 To: Jack Pace Planning Manager From: Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Fort Dent Three Office Park June 20, 1996 For: Received: Determination: Associated Permit(s): Adendum to SEPA (MDNS) Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Approved November 1990 ( #EPIC- 23 -90) 41-7. c'c+:' ?j Shoreline Substantial Development (File #1,96-8084) Prepared By: Alexa Berlow Project Description: SEPA Amendment for the construction of a two - story, 40,000 square foot office building with associated parking, utilities, and landscaping. Proponent: John C. Radovich Development Company Location: 6860 Fort Dent Way 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 ::aiF::EaWai +Sfi,.. SEPA Amendment - EPIC 23 -90 Fort Dent Three Office Park July 31, 1997 Date prepared: rune 23, 1997 Lead Agency: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development Challenges to Document: None Other Agencies of Jurisdiction: State of Washington - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Recommendation: Amendment to (MDNS) Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Comments to SEPA Checklist: Page 2, #6: Construction is expected to take place between Summer 1997 and Winter 1998. Page 2, #8: On October 25, 1988, a mitigated DNS was issued on this site for a similar office building project (88- 3 -SMP) and again in 1990 (90- 6 -SMP). Design Review (90- 12 -DR) and SEPA (EPIC23 -90) have also been issued for this development. Page 3. #11: The proposal is to development a 40,379 square foot, Class A office building on two (2) of a total 5.57 acres, as Phase Three (3) of the Fort Dent Office Park project. Summary of Primary Impacts: SEPA Amendment - EPIC 23 -90 Fort Dent Three Office Park July 31, 1997 Earth d. There is no surface indications or history of unstable soils, however, Fort Dent Two was built on piles. Fort Dent Three will have conventional concrete spread footings. g. About 71% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction. h. Proposed erosion control measures will include filter fabric fences, interceptor swales, check dams, catch basin protection, and rocked construction. Air None Water a. Surface 2. A portion of the building, parking lot, and landscaping, along the north and east sides of the property will be constructed within 200 feet of the Green River. Work in this area will include extensions of the water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage systems. 3. Existing is fill from the development of Fort Dent Two, and last Fall 1996, rainstorms caused some dredging and filling to support pockets of unstable soil. c. Water Runoff 1. Storm runoff will be directed to grass lined swales leading to an underground pipe, connected to an existing piped storm system to the south. Runoff will eventually outlet to the river. Plants d. An improved landscape plan is proposed, including Redtwig Dogwood, White Rockrose, Warminster Broom, Escallonia, Forsythia, Spirea and Viburnum shrubs. Tree species will include Norway Maple, Katsura, Pine, Flowering Cherry, and Flowering Pear. �:.::s.. .:.hiil:.a�.;r��Yi�s drisG3 :.*_ +".,.s'^S.ti'•;a•,'••��S - ��:��`+S'�' �`+V: ^u.'-s�4MfY.Jib is F:•^• •.. w: E 'ihninr ^tsiLs- 40.4.4.iixi{Y'_. P;a51:t5,1 •t" d:t*'Y'A iatfi d ?,:a4•u,kle+1?` .1.TA: • si n SEPA Amendment - EPIC 23 -90 Fort Dent Three Office Park July 31, 1997 Animals None Z: e`w: 6 --10 None > N w • w =; J H- w 0• g CO • D I— Ili Land /Shoreline Uses z a. The site is currently vacant land. The green River and Fort Dent Park lie to the z 0:. north and west of the proposed site. The Fort Dent Two office building lies to g the south. Homewood Suites Hotel is to the southeast, and State Farm Insurance Company has an office building to the south. ,o i w b. The property was once used for vegetable farming, more than 30 years ago. 0. Z; e. The current zoning classification of the site is Regional Commercial Mixed c.) (4' Use (RCMU). f- O Energy/Natural Resources Environmental Health None 1. The property will be developed in accordance with City of Tukwila Regional Commercial Mixed Use zoning regulations. Housing None Aesthetics a. The tallest point of the proposed office building would be 33 feet, or 27 feet exclusive of the HVAC unit and screening. Principal building materials will be painted drivet or tilt -up concrete, reflective glass, vision glass, and blue colored accents on the metal panels. c. Measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts were addressed and approved by the Board of Architectural Review at the November 1990 public hearing (90- 12 -DR). 4.::.f L'tmn.,4,1S:.:t+1i�tkL(414Yv i ;;+•u:it:.4`,4,4rivv i:irtia,+::a.hl i:ftS'ii:)�Y. u'I .r•w.::s v+c:: ^:dztiu!tk-1+r``k ttti/ :: i4, s!:+i xn; zt. oFS' d`. K?.. cti. e ^.!'k.4:t.e*WtAW)14r'i:4'w' Oi:iFi' +; bu( ut.. �r;�:'4.:`?l�.`2:'.:f.elatr:•4: • •I SEPA Amendment - EPIC 23 -90 Fort Dent Three Office Park July 31, 1997 Light/Glare The project site will be illuminated, as needed, with low glare lights on 10 to 20 foot standards. Ground mounted up lighting Recreation a. Fort Dent Park is adjacent to the office development. The Green River recreational trail has also been recently developed adjacent to the site. c. Benches and enhanced landscaping will be added along the Green River recreational trail. Historic /Cultural Preservation None Transportation a. Interurban Avenue South and Fort Dent Way serve the subject property. Access to these streets is from a 20 foot ingress /egress easement on the southerly property line, shared by Fort Dent Two, Homewood Suites Hotel, and eventually by Fort Dent Three. c. 142 parking stalls are proposed for Fort Dent Three. There will be additional parking available at Fort Dent Two. No stalls will be eliminated. f. The development of Fort Dent Three would generate an additional 707 vehicular trips per day on the site. Public Services None Utilities A water extension will be looped around the building, and a new sewer lateral will be constructed. Sanitary sewer and water are provided by the City of Tukwila. Electrical service is by Puget Sound Energy and telephone is by US West. Extensions of the existing services will be constructed to the new building. SEPA Adendum Approved By: U - Date: 1,jj) ) 2 .,. .. „i i ?`�.' ..w :t- -.i %l. ..n .x ;. 4�5 • +.u`4Vll:l:i.t:2r�i•r:nc.3,. r:3Y.{Sri.:.t '4.idi.ri `. ..r/ 'i� ji ?d•t n ��x; �b- a�:..:`..,,� +fFJire@ i:�' n`'�i�iL�aiS .11': M • • UO: w =;. • Jf-r LL: • w O u-. < = cu. • 1- w;. z ci • U • w w.: 'H U. _ .w Utn: z. Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists & Environmental Scientists June 25, 1997 E- 3007 -7 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Alexa Berlow Subject: Riverbank Stability Fort Dent 3 Tukwila, Washington Reference: Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E- 3007 -2, November 2, 1987 Geotechnical Engineering Study Update E- 3007 -7, December 20, 1997 Dear Ms. Berlow: In accordance with the request of Rebecca Davidson, with the John C. Radovich Development Company, we have reviewed the available subsurface information in the vicinity of the site and made site visits to observe the existing condition of the bank of the Green River for the purpose of addressing the stability of the riverbank. The condition of the riverbank was observed from both sides of the river. The majority of the riverbank is currently covered with thick vegetation consisting of grass, brush, blackberries and some trees. Soil was exposed on the bank within a few feet of the waterline on June 24, 1997. The bank appears to have an overall slope ratio of about 1.5H:1 V (Horizontal:Vertical). No indications of active erosion were observed on the riverbank. The bank was observed to slope in a uniform manner to the water line. RECEIVED J(JN 2 6 1997 COMMUNITY fl :\ /I noNfic Mr 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 Bellevue (206) 643 -3780 Seattle (206) 464 -1584 FAX (206) 74- 608-60 Tacoma (206) 272 -6608 . +1, ?. 1, .. J a_ ,e,�. 4,.- :i:h,i„ �� }i wrrt F.+ S:.$:: if ti`: Ncky" iY[' iiu��i•. 4�: vtli2e s,-.'�:3'is..ni�.CitN.�i.:':�i tf.,�+.!�.�re «'.4�it:�7:`LkKJI i?iR"w'•bN.i:'\L.[?3iekli'i '6g • '0 O • • J = H •:w Or .u- DI ` • =-w, • I- O zE w• 0 ,, Qi w W; O: MUM; • U IF O z• City of Tukwila Department of Community Development June 25, 1997 E- 3007 -7 Page 2 It is our understanding that the City of Tukwila stabilized a portion of the riverbank that borders the Fort Dent 3 project in 1995. Review of the plans and specifications for this project indicates that the riverbank in the area where this work was performed did not have a uniform slope parallel to the river flow and, therefore, required stabilization procedures. However, the conditions that warranted the stabilization performed by the City of Tukwila do not exist on the remaining portions of the riverbank that border the Fort Dent 3 project. The portion of the riverbank that was not stabilized by the city in 1995 was observed to be in a similar condition to the portion that was stabilized, indicating it is in a stable condition. Based on the observed condition of the riverbank, and the fact that earthwork construction for the Fort Dent 3 project will not occur on or immediately adjacent to the top of the riverbank, it is our opinion that the riverbank is stable in its present condition and configuration and that stabilization measures are not necessary to achieve a stable riverbank for the life of the project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please contact us. Yours very truly, EARTH CONSULTANTS, INC. • Kyle R. Campbell, P.E. Manager of Geotechnical Services KRCIkmI cc: Rebecca Davidson Earth Consultants, Inc. ` ?:",ate ,v0..! r0:a:ti lra;l:;:. d tl!i 4ltaiar:e ,.:ktgi i ;n C3V%A# + S fit Mi i"ta`d� 45ti'V *Cratm .1 "en .W%.MC'h,teaeVN .z • ;_17 z: • w' J Vi. Ol :in Di .w.w .co ILL 'w O'. • • Jd LL. Q z g-: • w w; • � o 10 H • • wz z. June 23, 1997 Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington RE: 1997 AMENDMENT TO 1990 SEPA CHECKLIST FORT DENT THREE Dear Alexa: As you requested, we have completed updating our 1990 SEPA Checklist for the development of Fort Dent Three. It was our understanding this would now complete any further requirements for additional information from us. As you can appreciate we are most anxious to complete this process and apply for our building permit. Hopefully this amendment meets with your approval and allows us to move forward. Thank you, Alexa, for your help in this process. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, JO I_ RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY becca Davidson RECEIVED Jac- Development Company 2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (425) 454 -6060 'fl� �iCi.ii,T;��1Y�ti Xu o iSi!v�t;•�> �.cn�.�s'::Sf'Si:CW :aa":6fei ? i- s. �,'? �. ri; ld'+' k :.l�..'•'ri.°':'t�t�rYT*.ic�:< JUN 2 3 1997 COMMUNITY_ DEVELOPMEN `�,.4M;1rti�.;r. RI �, i�: i .'.:R7� ".�7•�i:..i:;ki ^�:. {i >;, Syr.: �.;. 9" t�'.• w. i�J. 4ia• Y.=. L° a;:', wrY. �t.• ,s.itASDai�'.�i%i�l:,:idl��`�5. kuA ak Date: To: From: Re: May 8, 1997 Alexa Berlow, Planning Joanna Spencer Fort Dent III Shoreline -L97 -003 Revision Submittal Received on April 30, 1997 by DCD PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS Revise Access Maintenance Easement callout on sheet C -1 to read: "Provide construction and maintenance easement from thread of the river to City right -of -way for Tukwila, Green River Flood Zone Control District and US Army Corps of Engineers ". Construction and maintenance easement document shall be in City format. Owner to provide proof of ownership. General access easement through the property from Fort Dent Way to the riverbank to allow access for riverbank maintenance is also required. Submit a geotechnical riverbank stabilization analysis by your geotechnical engineer as required under Flood Zone Control Ordinance to determine existing /needed improvements to achieve stable riverbank for the life of the project for intended use for sections A through F. City of Tukwala stabilized the bank between Sections A & C for the purpose of the trail construction. Refer to city of Tukwila "Specificatons for Riverbank Stabilization for Green /Duwamish River Trail " dated March 1995 prepared by Kpff Consulting Engineers 44 April 30, 1997 Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: L96 -0084- Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Dear Alexa: Attached you will find the remainder of those items requested in your April 10 letter to us regarding our Shoreline Substantial Development Permit. These items correspond to your comments to our proposal in the areas of Planning, Public Works, Parks and Recreation and Points of Information We believe we have now complied with all outstanding issues and have met the time frame necessary to complete our application. As always, Alexa, should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, JO RADOVI H DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ebecca Davidson Jc&J1IC.RailOvlCIlDevelopment Company 2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454 -6060 RECEIVED APR 3 0 1997 COMMUN1V DEVELOPMENT :�L1;e z ;:- 7 'di :i i rumast4 ;k+xre. sWa t ar:.1x t•4r • ar.:w .ra1,,C s Fr 4 i. �A ,;•� "1. `• ..�..1� ..� •:fir. FORT DENT III CONCEPTUAL STORM REPORT ii .r u. i >r.<'.l a iaie.1�+576.i: `...:... u, iV;. n`:' it %viie�.'l� +a'igi';:e���ydS�?.:, .;5'%;l'•.!:'.µ x'i "L Urban Design Inc. 733 7th Ave. Suite 212 Kirkland, WA 98033 (206)- 822 -4886 RECEIVED APR 3 0 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :Z • • 'U O . uj t J~ w0 �QQ F-.0 z�f. %;11J • w • • LLI H V' z Existing Conditions: The site is currently vacant, previously cleared land located on the Green River near the entrance to the Fort Dent Park. The site slopes in several directions and outlets via pipe to the north and east. There is a trail system between the river and the site consisting of an approximately 12' wide asphalt trail. The project is part of an office complex that has been constructed in two other phases. This phase of the project was included in the storm and utility design of the Fort Dent II project. Also completed at that time were the SEPA and BAR processes. Developed Conditions: A two story office building with associated parking is proposed on the site. Storm runoff from the parking lot will sheet flow into grass lined swales around the perimeter of the site between the parking and the river. The swale is divided into two 100' long segments that are interconnected with pipe and conveyance swales. No detention is required, as river widening was completed for both phase II & III when phase II was constructed. Calculations are enclosed showing that the required retention volume for a 100 year 7 day storm is provided in the river. Developed flows have been calculated for the site using the Waterworks computer program. An 18" pipe was extended to the site when phase II was developed. The downstream drainage system was also analyzed at that time to include this development. Developed Flows: The Phase II & III combined site area is 5.2acres. The soil on the site has been imported, but was taken as a type C based on visual observations and previous soils work. The landscape area is approximately 1.70 acres. The time of concentration for the impervious area was taken as 6.3minutes (the minimum value). For the pervious area the time was calculated in front of the proposed building. The 100 year 7 day rainfall is 9.8 ". The total required storage volume is 36048 cuft. (See attached printout.) .. n.lw_a,::3, ::erii:.':�Jy:..:+i s..a' cif.•. .i.L'•s:�l:.:«Sb!:rl]:i.c:wl:,i le:aaaSi. <v::i:acf.'a:�iLu .., ..- - .yi.i'¢Sj'.:,:iii i4'u.i:.4i'Ia.Ir'6...- o-1.) I: `Yi...�_.Y u.:Y:v:..:- 4/30/97 10:23:52 am Basin Reports Urban Design Inc Fort Dent III page , 1 BASIN ID: d100 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA RAINFALL TYPE PRECIPITATION TIME INTERVAL ABSTRACTION COEFF: TcReach - Sheet L: PEAK RATE: 0.21 cfs BASIN ID: d2 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA RAINFALL TYPE PRECIPITATION TIME INTERVAL • • • BASIN SUMMARY NAME: 100 year 7 day storm phaselll 2.10 Acres KC7 9.80 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERV IMP AREA..: 0.64 Acres 1.46 Acres CN • 86.00 98.00 TC 31.43 min 6.30 min 0.20 100.00 ns:0.2400 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 VOL: 0.34 Ac -ft TIME: 3000 min t NAME: 2 year developed phasell I - �j�`OA1 `ems C"1\ 1.54 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs KC24HR 2.00 inches 10.00 min AREA..: CN • TC • PERV IMP 0.54 Acres 1.00 Acres 86.00 98.00 28.24 min 6.30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 140.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.54 cfs VOL: 0.19 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min BASIN ID: s100 SBUH METHODOLOGY TOTAL AREA • RAINFALL TYPE PRECIPITATION TIME INTERVAL NAME: 100 year 7 day II &III 5.20 Acres KC7 9.80 inches 10.00 min BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs PERV IMP AREA..: 1.70 Acres 3.50 Acres CN • 86.00 98.00 TC 28.24 min 6.30 min ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20 TcReach - Sheet L: 140.00 ns :0.1500 p2yr: 2.00 s:0.0050 PEAK RATE: 0.52 cfs VOL: 0.83 Ac -ftj TIME: 3000 min Oi Q)3 ec I,0: :, VcLU M e. 0 PLLTE 12- I-4 .57rS. 1 T fi S 3(00 (4 FT L'�•i!!'�:`.u'Y "�"'L;!'t tinl'ru'lt''.:. ...:; L: s. _,4:GU:.tritits�ivt�:or:�s+.-,ti Y -' ry -.•, Z z re w: 00: No' to w J =i CO LL; w O• J. w Q a. H=.. Z I- O` Z w w:. U �' w W. H ;; U. -0: Z. UN Z River Widening Calculations: Available volume by average end method (see cross sections) Section Area 97.5 G 72.2 66.3 70.2 66.3 58.5 68.3 70.2 END Average Distance Volume 84.9 75 6,364 69.3 128 8,870 68.3 63.5 4,337 68.3 60.5 4,132 62.4 65 4,056 63.4 63.5 4,026 69.3 67.5 4,678 35.1 55 1,931 TOTAL VOLUME 38,394Cuft This exceeds the required volume, therefore the previous river widening is adequate. B iofiltration Design: The two year runoff rate was calculated for the parking lot and landscape areas only. The building downspouts will bypass the swale and connect directly into the storm discharge system. The time of concentration for the impervious area was taken as 6.3 minutes (the minimum value). The impervious area is 1.00 acres, and the pervious area is 0.54 acres. The two year, 24 hour rainfall is 2.0 inches. The required width of swale was calculated using the Flowmaster Program (see attached printout). . • . Trapezoidal Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Fort Dent III Comment: Biofilter Design King County Method Solve For Bottom Width Given Input Data: Left Side Slope Right Side Slope Manning's n Channel Slope Depth Discharge Computed Results: Bottom Width.... Velocity Flow Area Flow Top Width. Wetted Perimeter. Critical Depth Critical Slope Froude Number 3.00:1 (H:V) 3.00:1 (H:V) 0.350 0.0200 ft /ft 0.50 ft 0.54 cfs 2.16 ft 0.29 fps 1.83 sf 5.16 ft 5.33 ft 0.12 ft 3.8759 ft /ft 0.09 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.12 (c) 1990. Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06 URBAN DESIGN, INC Environmental Planning Civil Engineering Landscape Design & Project Management Services April 29, 1997 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Attention: Alexa Berlow Reference: L96 -0084 Fort Dent Three Dear Alexa: The Civil drawings have been revised per your April 10`11 letter. A separate site plan has been added to the conceptual utility plan to help clarify the 40' setback line for the river environment which was originally shown but was difficult to read. There are no roads, parking areas or storage within the river environment A note for the future King County access easement for river dike maintenance has also been added to the plan. The Fort Dent II project included river widening for the 7 day 100 year storm storage for both phases II and III and a copy of those calculations has been resubmitted. A two foot shoulder has been shown adjacent to the trail. The original design included allowances for the placement of landscaping features, including benches or tables, on the land side of the trail and therefore the design has not been changed. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincere y, RECEIVED APR 3 0 1997 Corporate Office: 733 7th Avenue, Suite 212 Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone: (206) 822 -4886 Fax (206) 822 -7870 COMMUNITY Hawaii Office: DEVELOPMENT 311 South Lehua Street Kahului, Maui, 111 96732 Telephone: (808) 871 -5701 - SEA ' . TAC ELECTRIC, INC. ort Dent Three 'ukwilla, Washington :TERIOR LIGHTING UBMITTALS April 29 1997 6265 So.143rd Place Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 244 -0292 Fax (206) 242 -5121 ECEREED • APR 3 0 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Concourse III •l ( Concourse III is the most versatile, functionally designed, universally adaptable outdoor lighting available. Through a variety of mounting styles, it offers a family of low profile sharp cutoff luminaires that make optimum use of today's high output HID sources. Uniform in appearance and compact in size, this single piece soft - cornered cast aluminum housing offers the designer a unique opportunity in lighting flexibility for all outdoor applications. Enhancing natural landscapes as well as cityscapes, Concourse III brings outstanding performance and style to walkways, parking lots, roadways. loading docks, building areas, and any security lighting application. Design Features Designed for single or multiple units pn square or round poles, side or top mounting with low to high level lighting, perimeter or median patterns of light, undirectional or multidirectional rotation of optical distribution, mast arm or architecturally 6 1/4' (Square p_iel 6 3/8' (Round p_lel - -14 7/8' —. styled mounting btackets, metal halide or high pressure sodium lamp types, Concourse III is the most completely coordinated lighting concept in the industry. 7Wo spring -steel quick release latches on housing for easy opening, closing or complete removal of door without the use of tools. Porcelain screw shell type lamp socket with spring - loaded center contact. (Metal halide supplied with position- oriented mogul base.) One - plece, die -cast aluminum housing features aesthetically pleasing soft- corner design. Architectural dark bronze polyester powder coat finish. Closed cell gas - filled high temperature silicone gasketing. Completely seals optical system from dirt, bugs, or other foreign material. One -piece hydroformed finished aluminum reflectors provide five different optical distributions and sharp cutoff control. Universal mounting clamp concealed in housing fits 1 1/2" to 2 3/8" O.D. horizontal tenons without requiring adapters or rearrangement of component parts. Provides a +5' vertical leveling adjustment. Easily removable high power factor multi -tap HID ballast. (standard) Integral hinges prevent door rocking and optimizes sealing capabilities. Lens is thermal shock and Impact - resistant clear tempered glass. t(zql/ ✓VlG�l�l� Fhotometrics CS -1 Catalog Number CS7252 250 -Watt HPS Design 20 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp lireArealM 111 4 3 2 c 2 3 4 teral and Longitudinal istance in Units of Mounting Heights CS -2 Catalog Number CS7253 250•Watt HPS Design 22 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp E 4 3 2 0 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 4 og Number CS7252 250 -Watt HPS Design 30 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp CS -4 Catalog Number CS7254 250 -Watt HPS Design 40 30.000 Lumen Clear Lamp 3 2 C 1 2 3 4 5 CS -5 Catalog Number CS7255 250-Watt HPS Design 50 30.000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 0 2 4 2 3 4 Footcandle Table for Isofootcandle Charts Select mounting height and read across for isofootcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Mounting Isofootcandle Line Height A B C D E 15' 6.6 3.3 1.4 20' 3.7 1.9 0.8 25' 2.4 1.2 0.5 30' 1.7 0.8 0.3 Lamp Proration For 400 Watt clear HPS multiply footcandle readings by 1.67. 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 CS -6 Catalog Number CS7152 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 20 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 3 4 4 CS -7 Catalog Number CS7153 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 22 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 0 2 3 2 0 4 CS -8 Catalog Number CS7152 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 30 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp I� ®,rte eau minainitani rfArloi 4 3 0 2 3 4 CS -9 Catalog Number CS7154 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 40 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp «r[ : bt1u '1MVAII' iiuuiriu 1.c.r 2 0' 2 3 4 CS -10 Catalog Number CS7155 250•Watt Metal Halide Design 50 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 3 2 0 2 0 2 4 2 3 4 Footcandle Table for Isofootcandle Charts Select mounting height and read across tor isofootcandle values of each Isofootcandle line. Mounting Isofootcandle Line Height A B C D E 15' 5.5 2.8 1.4 0.5 20' 3.1 1.6 0.8 0.3 25' 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 30' 1.4 0.7 0.3 0.1 Lamp Proration For 400 Watt clear Metal Halide multiply footcandle readings by 0.65. 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 -MT S4141 44.4Y5x enng n orma ion ' Cataog Number Logic 1st Digit= 2nd Digit= 3rd Digit= 4th Digit= 5th Digit= 6th Digit= 9th Digit= Product Family Mounting Housing Series Lamp Type Lamp Wattage Optics Voltage C= Concourse III S= Standard 7 =7000 1 =Met. Hal. 1= 70 2= Design 20/30 120 =120 Q= Spider 2 =HPS 2 =100 3= Design 22 208 =208 3 =150 4= Design 40 240 =240 5 =250 5= Design 50 277 =277 6 =400 480 =480 9 =Multi Tap Catalog Lamp Lamp Ballast Net Wt. Volume Number Type Wattage Type Optics (Lbs.) Cu. Ft.) Standard Unit (Mast Arm Mount) CS7212 HPS 70 React. 20/301 39 2.15 CS7222 HPS 100 React. 20/30t CS7232 HPS 150' React. 20/301 CS7252 HPS 250 CWA 20/30t CS7262 HPS 400 CWA 20/30t CS7142 MH 175 CWA 20/30t 39 vCS7152 MH 250 CW • 20/30t 7 CS7162 MH 400" CWA 20/30t CS7213 HPS 70 React. 22 39 CS7223 HPS 100 React. 22 CS7233 HPS 150' React. 22 CS7253 HPS 250 CWA 22 CS7263 HPS 400 CWA 22 CS7143 MH 175 CWA 22 39 CS7153 MH 250 CWA 22 CS7163 MH 400" CWA 22 CS7214 HPS 70 React. 40 39 CS7224 HPS 100 React. 40 CS7234 HPS 150' React. 40 CS7254 HPS 250 CWA 40 CS7264 HPS 400 CWA 40 CS7144 MH 175 CWA 40 39 CS7154 MH 250 CWA 40 CS7164 MH . 400" CWA 40 CS7215 HPS 70 React. 50 39 CS7225. HPS 100 React. 50 CS7235 HPS 150' React. 50 CS7255 HPS 250 CWA 50 CS7265 HPS 400 CWA 50 CS7145 MH 175 CWA 50 39 CS7155 MH 250 CWA 50 CS7165 MH 400" CWA 50 Internal Pipe Clamp: Mounting will accommodate 1 1/2 " -2 3/8" O,D. horizontal tenons. Bracket arms not Included with standard unit. One bracket arm must be crdered for each standard unit. See Accessories section. Spider Mount CQ7212 HPS 70 React. 20/30t 39 5.50 007222 HPS 100 React. 20/301. C07232 HPS 150' React. 20/30t C07252 HPS 250 CWA 20/30t C07262 HPS 400 CWA 20/30t 007142 MH 175 CWA 20/30t 39 C07152 MH 250 CWA 20/30t C07162 MH 400" . CWA 20/30t C07213 HPS 70 React, 22 39 C07223 HPS 100 React. 22 007233 HPS 150' React. 22 C07253 HPS 250 CWA 22 CQ7263 HPS 400 CWA 22 C07143 MH 175 CWA 22 C07153 MH 250 CWA 22 C07163 MH 400" CWA 22 C07214 HPS 70 C07224 HPS 100 C07234 HPS 150' C07254 HPS 250 C07264 HPS 400 C07144 C07154 C07164 MH MH MH C07215 HPS C07225 HPS C07235 HPS C07255 HPS C07265 HPS C07145 MH C07155 MH C07165 MH Lamps not included. '150 Watt HPS lamps use lamp arc rating of 55 volts. "400 Watt Metal Halide use E28 lamp only. To order E28 lamp add suffix LA70X079 to catalog number. 1.Design 20/30 is preset at the factory for Type II distribution. Socket assembly is field- adjustable for Type III (Design 30) distribution. 175 250 400" React. React. React. CWA CWA CWA CWA CWA 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 70 React. 50 100 React. 50 150' React. 50 250 CWA 50 400 CWA 50 175 CWA 50 39 250 CWA 50 400" CWA 50 39 39 39 39 u' t1' ti ' ^:xtia.>:•:.;ri;iri.4.rEFt�z�fi ';bass ?aiaxri��La� ..�E:e�•,�a`K:. 1 Options (add as suffix) P Button type photocontrol. Field installed. (NEMA twist -lock photocontrol available upon request.) L. Level indicator. Accessories (order separately) Direct Arm Mountings Wall Mount Adapter Additional Mountings 00W CA40 CA41 CA14 Spider Mount/Yoke Mount For square pole. Order one bracket per For 3' Dia. round pole. Order one unit. bracket per unit. CA42 For 3 1/2" - 4' Dia. round pole. Order one bracket per unit. For wall mounting to concrete, steel. etc. Consult factory for other mounting styles. Pole Top Mounting Order appropriate slipfitter which includes mounting arm(s) Square height: 6 1/4"; Round height: 6 3/4 ". Slipfitter accommodates 2 3/8 " -3" O.D. pole top tenons. Square Poles CA43S Single JIM/ CA44S Double 90° imam `♦, I♦ CA45S Double 180° CA46S Quad 90' Round Poles .- CA43R Single CA44R Double 90° -.- • x • CA45R Double 180° CA46R CA47R Quad 90' Triple 120° How To Specify General Luminaire shall be McGraw- Edison series Concourse III catalog number for use with watt lamp. The maximum weight of the luminaire shall not exceed lbs. and its maximum effective projected area (EPA) shall not exceed square feet. Housing One piece durable die -cast aluminum, featuring an aesthetically pleasing soft corner design. Finish Bronze, polyester powder coat for color fastness, abrasion resistance, and longer product life. Clamping Assembly Universal mounting clamp concealed in housing. Fits 1 1/2" to 2 3/8" O.D. horizontal tenons without requiring adapters or rearrangement of component parts. Provides a +5° vertical leveling adjustment. Ballast An easily removable high power factor multi -tap HID ballast is standard. Other types of ballasts available. Lens Frame One -piece die -cast with integral hinges prevents door rocking and optimizes sealing capabilities. Lens is easily replaceable, thermal shock and impact resistant, made of tempered clear glass. Gasketing Closed cell gas - filled high temperature silicone gasketing. Completely seals optical system from dirt, bugs, or other foreign material. Reflector Hydroformed one piece finished aluminum reflectors, specifically designed to provide five optical distributions and sharp cutoff control. Lamp Socket Porcelain screw shell type with spring - loaded center contact. Metal halide supplied with position - oriented mogul base socket. Latches Two spring steel quick release latches on housing for easy opening or closing or complete removal of door without the use of tools. Level Indicator An available option for mounting in tens frame for easy viewing to check level of housing. Indicates amount of tilt of luminaire over a range of +5. Visible in daylight to a distance of 50'. Photocontrol Optional button type photocontrol or NEMA twist lock receptacle are available for field installation in pole or luminaire housing. Knockouts are provided in housing for button type. Electrical UL listed for wet location. CSA certified. McGraw - Edison P.O. Box 824 Vicksburg, Mississippi 39181 601.638.1522 Fax 601.634.9606 41 COOPER WSTRISS COOPER LIGHTING ADH900035 1 McGRAW- EDISDN Concourse III is the most versatile, functionally ' designed, universally adaptable outdoor lighting available. Through a variety of mounting styles, it offers a family of low profile sharp cutoff luminaires that make optimum use of today's high output HID sources. Uniform in appearance and compact in size, this single piece soft - cornered cast aluminum housing offers the designer a unique opportunity in lighting flexibility for all outdoor applications. Enhancing natural landscapes as well as cityscapes, Concourse 111 brings outstanding performance and style to walkways, parking lots, roadways, loading docks, building areas, and any security lighting application. Design Features Designed for single or multiple units on square or round poles, side or top mounting with low to high level lighting, perimeter or median patterns of light, undirectional or multidirectional rotation of optical distribution, mast arm or architecturally 70 -400 Watt 6 1/4' (Square Pole) 6 3/8- (Round Pole) 14 7/8' —• styled mounting bfackets, metal halide or high pressure sodium lamp types, Concourse III is the most completely coordinated lighting concept in the industry. 7Wo spring -steel quick release latches on housing for easy opening, closing or complete removal of door without the use of tools. Porcelain screw shell type lamp socket with spring - loaded center contact. (Metal halide supplied with position - oriented mogul base.) One - piece, die -cast aluminum housing features aesthetically pleasing soft -corner design. Architectural dark bronze polyester powder coat finish. Closed cell gas -filled high temperature silicone gasketing. Completely seals optical system from dirt, bugs, or other foreign material. One -piece hydroformed finished aluminum reflectors provide five different optical distributions and sharp cutoff control. Universal mounting clamp concealed in housing fits 1 1/2" to 2 3/8" O.D. horizontal tenons without requiring adapters or rearrangement of component parts. Provides a +5° vertical leveling adjustment. Easily removable high power factor multi -tap HID ballast. (standard) Integral hinges prevent door rocking and optimizes sealing capabilities. Lens Is thermal shock and impact - resistant clear tempered glass. CSIArchitecturaf Area Light or( ourse 111 t..e+axeMf°tMi¢9?7e slS ' , • !.rrlm.3. ; TPItk ,w tIltr Vm SNv;?'; -TekC''.',�,i7.1',E ,,a -1:0 ."- 'iY?,�.'.. ..'.Yn'�3r:.!?{ .,.'.�N.�s.?:: .. };. '.,- .:'.�'!rZ ti.:v 'r`�, . Phutometrics CS -1 Catalog Number CS7252 250 -Watt HPS Design 20 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 likiteral and Longitudinal stance in Units of Mounting Heights CS -2 Catalog Number CS7253 250 -Watt HPS Design 22 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 3 2 0 2 3 2 2 4 4 • CS -3 Catalog Number CS7252 250 -Watt HPS Design 30 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp ►, ,■l111 ■ Amonsmasiii umas_Tarmim 'wi=ma=r %> 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 CS -4 Catalog Number CS7254 250 -Watt HPS Design 40 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp l \�/JRJ 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 CS -5 Catalog Number CS7255 250 -Watt HPS Design 50 30,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 0 1 2 3 4 3 4 Footcandle Table for Isofootcandle Charts Select mounting height and read across for isofootcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Mounting Isofootcandie Line Height A B C D E 15' 6.6 3.3 20' 3.7 1.9 25' 2.4 1.2 30' 1.7 0.8 Lamp Proration For 400 Watt clear HPS multiply footcandle readings by 1.67. 1.4 0.6 0.8 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 CS -8 Catalog Number CS7152 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 20 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp ./i •i\. irk 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 CS -7 Catalog Number CS7153 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 22 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp «rir��•_.11 Ihnimainorir PIELMOINALlii 4 3 2 0 1 2 3 4 4 CS -8 Catalog Number CS7152 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 30 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp IITARTMEM AMIEVAIRIL 4 3 2 1 0 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 3 4 CS -9 Catalog Number CS7154 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 40 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 3 2 0 2 3 4 5 CS -10 Catalog Number CS7155 250 -Watt Metal Halide Design 50 23,000 Lumen Clear Lamp ifirostm 4 2 0 2 3 4 2 0 3 4 Footcandie Table for Isofootcandle Charts Select mounting height and read across for isofootcandle values of each isofootcandle line. Mounting Isofootcandie Line Height A B C D E 15' 20' 25' 30' 5.5 3.1 2.0 1.4 2.8 1.6 1.0 0.7 1.4 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 Lamp Proration For 400 Watt clear Metal Halide multiply footcandle readings by 0.65. 1A� Ordering Information Cataog Number Logic 1st Digit= 2nd Digit= 3rd Digit= 4th Digit= 5th Digit= 6th Digit= 9th Digit= Product Faribily Mounting Housing Series Lamp Type Lamp Wattage Optics Voltage C= Concourse III S= Standard 7 =7000 1 =Met. Hal. 1= 70 2= Design 20/30 120 =120 Q= Spider 2 =HPS 2 =100 3= Design 22 208 =208 3 =150 4= Design 40 240 =240 5 =250 5= Design 50 277 =277 6 =400 480 =480 9 =Multi Tap Catalog Lamp Lamp Ballast Number Type Wattage type Optics Standard Unit (Mast Arm Mount) CS7212 HPS 70 React. 20/301* 39 2.15 CS7222 HPS 100 React. 20/30t CS7232 HPS 150' React. 20/30t CS7252 HPS 250 CWA 20/30t CS7262 HPS 400 CWA 20/30t CS7142 MH 175 CWA 20/30t 39 CS7152 MH 250 CW4- 20/30t CS7162 MH 400" CWA 20/30t CS7213 HPS 70 React. 22 39 CS7223 HPS 100 React. 22 CS7233 HPS 150' React. 22 CS7253 HPS 250 CWA 22 CS7263 HPS 400 CWA 22 CS7143 MH 175 CWA 22 i' 39 CS7153 MH 250 CWA 22 ajliCS7163 MH 400" CWA 22 CS7214 HPS 70 React. 40 39 CS7224 HPS 100 React. 40 CS7234 HPS 150' React. 40 CS7254 HPS 250 CWA 40 CS7264 HPS 400 CWA 40 CS7144 MH 175 CM. 40 39 CS7154 MH 250 CWA 40 CS7164 MH 400" CWA 40 CS7215 HPS 70 React. 50 39 CS7225 HPS 100 React. 50 CS7235 HPS 150' React. 50 CS7255 HPS 250 CWA 50 CS7265 HPS 400 CWA 50 Net Wt. Volume (Lbs.) Cu. Ft.) CS7145 MH 175 CWA 50 39 CS7155. MH 250 CWA 50 CS7165 MH 400" CWA 50 Internal Pipe Clamp: Mounting will accommodate 1 1/2"-2 3/8" O.D. horizontal tenons. Bracket arms not included with standard unit. One bracket arm must be ordered for each standard unit. See Accessories section. Spider Mount C07212 HPS 70 React. 20/301 39 5.50 C07222 HPS 100 React. 20/30t CQ7232 HPS 150' React. 20/30t C07252 HPS 250 CWA 20/30t C07262 HPS 400 CWA 20/30t C07142 MH 175 CWA 20/301* 39 CQ7152 MH 250 CWA 20/30t 007162 MH 400" CWA 20/301* C07213 HPS 70 React. 22 39 C07223 HPS 100 React. 22 C07233 HPS 150' React. 22 007253 HPS 250 • CWA 22 007263 HPS 400 CWA 22 C07143 MH 175 CWA 22 39 C07153 MH 250 CWA 22 C07163 MH 400" CWA 22 C07214 HPS 70 React. 40 39 C07224 HPS 100 React. 40 C07234 HPS 150' React. 40 C07254 HPS 250 CWA 40 C07264 HPS 400 CWA 40 C07144 MH 175 CWA 40 39 007154 MH 250 CWA 40 C07164 MH 400" CWA 40 007215 HPS 70 React. 50 39 007225 HPS 100 React. 50 C07235 HPS 150' React. 50 C07255 HPS 250 CWA 50 007265 HPS 400 CWA 50 007145 MH 175 CWA 50 39 007155 MH 250 CWA 50 007165 MH 400" CWA 50 Lamps not Included. '150 Watt HPS lamps use lamp arc rating of 55 volts. "400 Watt Metal Halide use E28 lamp only. To order E28 lamp add suffix LA70X079 to catalog number. tDesign 20/30 is preset at the factory for Type II distribution. Socket assembly is field- adjustable for Type III (Design 30) distribution. .'S'•33.4.1a4 Ps.r... CIS.4V:'CY[ 100. JYpNfdM1'n1E.'i.gialtI= `16:°12 i1*iiYL JM #SYtYk3R .4141803' .... f47.: Z Q • ~ W D` UO top, fn W. W =; W O i. g J' W Z�. D ;WW° LL 0' .Z; liJ U Z ' Options (add as suffix) P Button type photocontrol. Field installed. (NEMA twist -lock photocontrol available upon request.) L Level indicator, Accessories (order separately) Direct Arm Mountings CA4O CA41 For square pole. Order one bracket per For 3" Dia. round pole. Order one unit. bracket per unit. CA42 For 3 1/2" - 4" Dia. round pole. Order one bracket per unit. Wall Mount Adapter fiw Additional Mountings CA14 Spider Mount/Yoke Mount For wall mounting to concrete, steel, etc. Consult factory for other mounting styles. Pole Top Mounting Order appropriate slipfitter' which includes mounting arm(s) Square height: 6 1/4"; Round height: 6 3/4 ". Slipfitter accommodates 2 3/8 " -3" O.D. pole top tenons. Square Poles Round Poles M CA43S CA44S CA45S Single Double 90' Double 180° How To Specify General Luminaire shall be McGraw - Edison series Concourse III catalog number for use with watt lamp. The maximum weight of the luminaire shall not exceed lbs. and its maximum effective projected area (EPA) shall not exceed square feet. Housing One piece durable die -cast aluminum, featuring an aesthetically pleasing soft corner design. Finish Bronze, polyester powder coat for color fastness, abrasion resistance, and longer product life. Clamping Assembly Universal mounting clamp concealed in housing. Fits 1 1/2" to 2 3/8" O.D. horizontal tenons without requiring adapters or rearrangement of component parts. Provides a +5° vertical leveling adjustment. CA46S Quad 90° CA43R Single CA44R Double 90° Ballast An easily removable high power factor multi -tap HID ballast is standard. Other types of ballasts available. Lens Frame One -piece die -cast with integral hinges prevents door rocking and optimizes sealing capabilities. Lens is easily replaceable, thermal shock and impact resistant, made of tempered clear glass. Gasketing Closed cell gas - filled high temperature silicone gasketing. Completely seals optical system from dirt, bugs, or other foreign material. Reflector Hydroformed one piece finished aluminum reflectors, specifically designed to provide five optical distributions and sharp cutoff control. M all=1 CA45R CA46R CA47R Double 180° Quad 90° Triple 120° x A Lamp Socket Porcelain screw shell type with spring - loaded center contact. Metal halide supplied with position- oriented mogul base socket. Latches Two spring steel quick release latches on housing for easy opening or closing or complete removal of door without the use of tools. Level indicator An available option for mounting in lens frame for easy viewing to check level of housing. Indicates amount of tilt of luminaire over a range of +5. Visible in daylight to a distance of 50'. Photocontrol Optional button type photocontrol or NEMA twist lock receptacle are available for field installation in pole or luminaire housing. Knockouts are provided in housing for button type. Electrical UL listed for wet location. CSA certified. McGraw- Edison P.O. Box 824 Vicksburg, Mississippi 39181 601.638.1522 Fax 601.634.9606 Al COOPER INDUSTRIES COOPER LIGHTING ADH900035 SQUARE STPAIGHT AND TAPERED STEEL POLE,, ORDERING INFORMATION The following example illustrates the correct way to The ordering designation is detailed as follows. enter an order for SSS5A2OSPM1XB. SQUARE STRAIGHT S S STEEL S SHAFT DIA. (AT BASE) 5 WALL MTG. THICK- HT. NESS (FT.) BASE TYPE A 20 S FIXTURE NO. & MTG. & LOCATION ARM ACCESSORIES FINISH TYPE OF ARMS LENGTH (314" HUB) P M 1 X B FIXTURE SHAFT CATALOG MTG. SIZE NUMBER HT. (FT.) (IN.) Square Straight Steel SSS3A15SF 15 4 SSS3A2OSF 20 4 SSS4AMOSF 10 4 SSS4A15SF 15 4 SSS4A2OSF 20 4 '�SSS4A25SF 25 4 SSS5A2OSF 20 5 SSS5A25SF 25 5 SSS5A30SF 30 5 SSS6A25SF 25 6 SSS6A3OSF 30 6 SSS6M3OSF 30 6 BASE' PLATE SQUARE (IN.) BOLT SIZE (IN.) BOLT HAND PROJ. HOLE (IN.) SIZE 3/4 x 25 x 3 3/4 x 25 x 3 3/4 x 25 x 3 3/4x25x3 3/4x25x3 3/4x25x3 3/4x25x3 3/4x25x3 3/4x25x3 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 1 x 36 x 4 4'/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 41/4 43/4 43A 43/4 2x4 2 x 4 2 x 4 2 x 4 2 x 4 2 x 4 3x5 3 x 5 3x5 3 x 5 3 x 5 3 x 5 NET WT. (LB.) 70 80 EPA (SO. FT.) LOCATED AT POLE TOP2 152 152 88 120 152 184 184 223 254 269 317 483 N/A N/A 37.9 23.5 12.2 7.7 21.1 14.5 9.4 23.1 16.3 29.1 EPA (SO. FT.) LOCATED 2 FT. ABOVE POLE TOP2 MAX. FIXT. LOAD INC. BRKT. 90 100 110 70 80 90 100 110 (LBS.) 8.5 3.5 28.5 17,3 8.5 4.7 15.1 9.7 5.4 16.0 10.3 20.2 6.2 2.1 22.1 13.0 5.9 2.7 11.0 6.4 2.6 11.1 62 14.1 4.6 1.2 17.5 9.9 4.1 1.2 8.0 4.0 #.6 7.6 3.3 9.7 14.1 7.7 2.7 #.15 5.8 2.2 5.1 1.2 6.5 N/A N/A 27.0 14.8 10.1 6.6 17.6 12.5 7.5 19.9 13.0 23.2 5.3 2.9 20.3 10.9 7,0 4.0 12.6 8.3 4.3 13.7 8.2 16.1 3.9 1.8 15.8 8.2 4.9 2.3 9.1 5.5 2.1 9.6 5.0 11.2 2.8 .9 12.5 6.2 3.4 #1.0 6.7 3.4 #.5 6.6 2.6 7.7 10.1 4.85 2.25 4.85 1.9 4.4 .95 5.2 150 200 150 150 200 200 200 200 300 200 300 300 Square Tapered Steel STS6A16SF 16 53/4 x 339 101/2 STS6A2OSF 20 53/4 x 339 101/2 STS6A25SF 25 53/4 x 33/9 101/2 STS6B3OSF 30 STS6B35SF 35 STS6A39SF 39 STS7B39SF 39 STS9B5OSF3 50 STS9Z6OSF3 60 61/4 x 33/4 121/2 61/4 x 33x9 121/2 61/4 x 339 121/2 7'/4 x 33/9 121/2 91/4x4 17 9'/4 x 4 17 3/4x18x4 3/4x18 x4 3/4x18x4 1 x 36 x 6 1 x 36 x 6 1 x 36 x 6 1 x 36 x 6 1'/2 x60 x7 1' /2x60x7 41/4 3 x 5 180 39 8 30.1 23.5 18 8 41/4 3 x 5 180 30.6 22.9 17.7 14.0 41/4 3 x 5 180 22.7 16.6 12.6 9.7 434 3 x 5 262 23.8 17.3 12.8 9.7 43/4 3 x 5 301 25.7 18.5 13.6 10.3 43/4 3 x 5 301 17.9 12.0 8.2 5.7 43/4 3 x 5 365 29.6 21.1 15.4 11.4 61/4 3 x 5 646 34.5 23.7 16.5 11.7 61/4 3 x 5 1073 33.3 22.2 15.0 10 2 154 11.3 7.7 7.5 7.9 4.0 8.7 8.4 7.0 30.2 22.8 17.7 24.3 18.1 13.9 18.6 13.6 10.2 17.7 12.8 9.4 21.7 15.4 11.3 15.1 10.1 6.9 24.5 17.4 12.6 25.8 17.6 12.3 28.9 19.2 12.9 14,2 11.1 7.9 7.1 8.5 4.8 9.4 8.6 8.8 11.5 8.9 6.2 5.5 6.5 3.3 7.1 62 60 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 450 450 Catalog number includes pole with 4 anchor bolts with double ING ANCHOR BOLTS MAKE SURE PROPER ANCHOR BOL Note: Tenon size or machining for rectangular arms must be specified. Handhole is located 180' from singe arm # Not Recommended nuts. Standard finish is dark bronze polyester powder coat. BEFORE INSTALL - T TEMPLATE IS OBTAINED FROM MCGRAW - EDISON REPRESENTATIVE. 1 -Shaft size. base plate. anchor bolts and projection information may vary slightly. 2 -EPA results are based on shaft properties with wind normal to flat. EPA's calculated using base wind velocity as indicated plus 30% gust factor. 3.2 Piece Pole MOUNTING OPTIONS Fixed Tenons DESIGNATION O.D. NUMBER (IN.) 1 2 3 9 2Ne 2318 3 V2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 31/2 4 5 4 00 Lenpfn Machining for Rectangular Arms DESIGNATION QUALITY LETTER & NO. & LOCATION El SINGLE E2 2 ®180° E3 3090° E4 4@90° E5 2 @90° 3/a" Dia. Mtg. Hole 3/4 " Wiring Hole 3 /e' Dia. Mtg. Hole 2. 13/16" lie" 3.7/a" HOLES LOCATED 45° FROM MOUNTING BASE HOLES Note: McGraw - Edison reserves the right to change any dimensions shown without notice. FINISHES DESIGNATION TYPE OF LETTER FINISH F G J P u Y Dark Bronze Powder Coat Galvanized Dark Bronze Painted Prime Painted (STD) Black Painted Black Powder Coat McGRAW- EDISON COOPER INOUSTIII[5 ;:.SC :' • );r s�;.-, "l'. "::1:;z.`;iv� +',a- :���azriG - �: 3`. rti6; rr�: �dikl .�:nnr,•.�'a +��,k+.+fai'aes4'' �tx�eiS ACCESSORIES DESIGNATION LETTER DESCRIPTION A B c G H Tapped hub - Tapped hub - 3/4 "' Convenience Outlet" provision only Grounding lug (Max. wire #8 AWG) Additional handhole and cover - 12" below pole top - 90° from handhole 'Standard location is 3' above base - 90' from handhole. "Outlet is located 4' above base and on same side of pole as hand - hole. unless specified otherwise i l 8 d , 4r i w a i l l ` 1 k4 . i + i 4 ' , I t ~ z f L : W a ' t a : 1 l 5 ' a 0 handhole 12" -t BASE VIEW VICKSBURG, MISSISSIPPI 39180 ADH90063 -5 • , . Performance and Construction , 4.4"-. • , • • • • , • • '''4■Wer,' s II? • • . • i" " ORO. . PPP, • '411'‘ 4.01):60:014r0j§: due 10 • which , source'cutoff above horizontal. A soft glow from the louvers provides sufficient verti- cal illumination for .surrounding plants or pedestrians. The glass globe is completely gasketed and utililizes prismatics to optimize and control the light. With recommended coated lamps, a smooth wash of light is achieved with no shadows from the vertical supports. Electrical Components All HPF ballasts and components are factory mounted and prewired • to a single bracket for field installation within the riser. )-' - of heavy dio &af connected as'oife"ifili(WItfijOqk concealed stainless steel Sdr6sifSrA within the vertical supports. For relamping, these screws are removed and the interlock- ing louvers lifted as one unit, providing access to the glass enclosure and lamp. Louver base is die cast alu- minum and secures internally to the riser with four concealed stainless steel screws. Extruded Aluminum Riser 5" diameter .125" thick aluminum extrusion available in two • lengths for overall fixture heights of 24" and 32". Vertical groove detail aligns with the sc:n vertical fixture supports and serves to strengthen and unify the design. Thick internal ribs at the mounting screw locations provide increased strength. N M41,0710 • 4:Iiii:11.fgt.SIZ,Vsetr• 3 K I M LIGHTING z < • Z w ce —J O 0 ° L1.1 WI u_ u j 0 g u_ I' z ▪ o z • u O u) O — O I— O uj I 0 Li" 0 Li; u) O 1— z ORDER NUMBER EXAMPLE CB32 l 50MH277 MODEL ELECTRICAL MODE WH -P FINISH ORDERING INFORMATION MODEL CB24 COMPACT BOLLARD 24" OVERALL HEIGHT CB32 COMPACT BOLLARD 32" OVERALL HEIGHT ELECTRICAL LINE LINE MAX MODE VOLTS WATTS AMPS LAMPS BY OTHERS 100INC120 120 100 0.83 100 WATT INCANDESCENT A21 I.F. MEDIUM BASE 13CFL1201 120 13CFL2772 277 17 0.29 21 0.34 132`F STARTING TEMP. 20 °F STARTING TEMP. 13 WATT FLUORESCENT DOUBLE TWIN TUBE GX23 BASE 22CFL120 120 26 0.46 -20 °F STARTING TEMP. 22 WATT FLUORESCENT DOUBLE TWIN TUBE GX32d -2 BASE 50MH120 50MH277 120 72 0.65 50 WATT METAL HALIDE 277 72 0.30 ED17 MEDIUM BASE COATED 70MH120 70MH277 70MH347 50HPS120 50HPS277 120 89 0.85 *70 WATT METAL HALIDE 277 89 0.40 ED17 MEDIUM BASE 347 94 0.30 COATED 120 62 0.78 50 WATT COATED 277 66 0.30 HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ED17 MEDIUM BASE 70HPS120 70HPS208 70HPS240 70HPS277 70HPS347 75MV120 75MV277 120 208 240 277 347 86 91 91 91 93 0.89 0.47 0.40 0.35 0.30 *70 WATT COATED HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM ED17 MEDIUM BASE 120 93 0.82 *75 WATT COATED 277 93 0.35 MERCURY VAPOR ED17 MEDIUM BASE FINISH TGIC THERMOSET POWDER COAT PAINT BL -P BLACK DB -P DARK BRONZE LG -P LIGHT GRAY WH -P WHITE Compact Bollards SPECIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION Underwriters Laboratories listed (for 120, 208, 240, and 277 volt only) and Canadian Standards Association certified (for 120 and 347 volt only) for wet locations. TOP, LOUVERS Interlocking die cast alu- minum sections fasten together with con- cealed stainless steel screws. Louver base assembly fastens internally to riser with 4 concealed screws. RISER Extruded aluminum, 5" diameter, .125" typical wall thickness, external vertical grooves align with vertical members on louver assembly. Attaches to anchor base with 4 countersunk stainless steel flat socket head screws finished to match fixture. 13/,' DIA. CONDUIT ANCHOR BASE Heavy cast OPENING aluminum, fully concealed within ~. riser shaft. Three 3/8" x 10 " +2" Ji j0 zinc plated anchor bolts, each ., . '7) with two nuts and washers, and a rigid pressboard template. 27/13* BOLT CIRCLE GLOBE Internally fluted, clear DIAMETER tempered glass, fully gasketed. SOCKET Incandescent /HID models: porce- lain medium base rated 4KV. Fluorescent: 13w- GX23d; 22w- GX32d -2. BALLAST High Power Factor, prewired, mounts on secured bracket within riser. 13w Fluorescent: 120v 32 °F. starting; 277v 0°F. starting. 22w Fluorescent: 120v -20°F. starting. HID: -20 °F. starting temperature. FINISH TGIC thermoset polyester powder coat paint applied over a chromate conver- sion coating. Available in Black, Dark Bronze, Light Gray, or White. WARNING Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code. Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. PHOTOMETRIC INFORMATION INITIAL HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES FOR 24" HT. BOLLARD 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.49 5.23 oow INC 0.06 0 25 2.66 13W CFL 0.08 0.36 3.57 22W CFL 0.25 0.98 10.53 50W MH 0.28 110 11.77 50W HPS 7 ,.,rr.. 1 .,.1. , ' ' N4 8, at, I. 1 ---IIIIIIIIIIP:la a 1 \ 1 r` TYPICAL QUADRANT INITIAL HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES FOR 32" HT. BOLLARD 0.12' 0.06 0.31 1.31 7.75 100W INC 0.16 0.66 3.94 13W CFL 0.09 0.24 0.90 4.60 22W CFL 0.24 0.62 2.63 15.60 50W MH 0.39 0.98 4.18 24.78 70W MH 0.27 0.69 2.94 17.44 50W HPS 0.43 1.09 4.63 27.46 70W HPS 0.23 0.57 2 44 14.45 75W MV -41WW1k lb _ Mi 1 \ j TYPICAL QUADRANT * 70W MH and HPS, 75W MV are not recommended for CB24 due to extreme ight levels at fixture base. ©1993 KIM LIGHTING INC. THIS VERSION ©1994 KIM LIGHTING INC. 16555 EAST GALE AVENUE P.O. BOX 1275 CITY OF INDUSTRY, CA 91749 PHONE 818/968-5666 FAX 818/369-2695 sctivtl" 7ii:e:,.': i `M:'�i:f;;ts;dr��Yr{�+1`r!KStr` ,:••�if`.�}' • c�. 'Ml-ESMPTWAVAt'VrA9VPAPIttIMIM.M. 'MTV' :at<finfi�'9t$' 5700994182 • • ^J C L4 *100W. fixtures must be installed in concrete. See pages 10 and 16. Heterences: Specifications Considerations Installation P.10 Photometrics P.11 -12 Lamp Guide P.15 Ordering P.16 -17 LV P.4 (12V. lamp /120V. to Fixture) 7`'1. and 100W.* ED -17 MH 75W. and 100W.* ED -17 MV 70W. and 100W* ED -17 HPS Selections (One of each must be specified. Omit reflector for PAR -36 lamp.) Reflector: ( H.I.D. lamps only) Spun aluminum with Alzak° finish. 22° tilt, 360° rotation with locking j jo screws. 11/5" height adjustment with roundel lens, 3/4" with flat lens (limited adjustments when optional Internal Louver is used). Spot Cat. No. SP \ \\ l/ Narrow Flood Cat. No. NF Lens: Clear tempered molded glass, 3/16' thick. Flat lens fits flush with lens frame. One piece 'a silicone gasket (limited reflector adjustments when optional Internal Louver is used). Flat Cat. No. F Roundel Cat. No. R Options (Not included with standard fixture.) Internal Louver: 45° cutoff black hex -cell aluminum louver mounted in a circular frame. Mounts into reflector. Reflector adjustment limits: Roundel Lens - full 22° tilt, no height adj.; Flat Lens - no tilt or height adj. (see page 4). 45/5" Dia. -1 Cat. No. L34 Half- Shield: Cast bronze, factory mounted to lens frame with concealed screws. Field ro- tatable in 90 °increments. Natural as -cast finish 3L 3'4" 35° Cat. No. HS4 Rock Guard: Cast bronze, factory mounted to lens frame with concealed screws. Natural as- 11/2" Cat. No. cast finish (cannot be used with Half - Shield). [ RG4 Grout Mask: Welded galvanized steel frame 16, 12'' and reinforcing bar assembly. Supports fixture 7 during concrete pour and provides 2" grout .I /I-' Cat. No. space around fixture (see page 10). '� % GM34 ':'..r2+45 AKs1`; :41M:441031-'�'r1.0, x`1,1' s:skt '41:12r Factory Orientation of Optional Half - Shield 378" 83/16 3/4" 43//" (2) 3/4" N.P.T. Specifications Housing: One piece cast bronze, 3 /e" min. thickness. Separate lamp, ballast and splice compartments. Ballast and splice compartments have separate internal covers. Natural as -cast finish. Lens Frame: One piece cast bronze, 3/16" min. thickness with pebble pattern. Stainless steel hex - socket cap retainer screws and one piece molded silicone gasket. Natural as -cast finish. Lens: Choice of flat or roundel. See selections at left. Electrical Module: Single aluminum bracket holds factory pre -wired high power factor core - and -coil ballast, -20'F. starting, or120V. to 12V. stepdown core - and -coil transformer. Reflector: (H.I.D. lamps only) Choice of spot or narrow flood. See selections at left. Socket: (H.I.D. only) Porcelain medium base rated 4KV, mounted in reflector. Slip -on tabs for 12V. Wiring: All wires between splice and ballast compartments, plus ballast and lamp compart- ments, pass through anti - siphon barriers. W -20 hex head ground screw provided. Splice box is 17 cubic inches. Conduit Taps: Two 3/4" N.P.T. in bottom. Testing and Certification: Factory pressurized under water to 10 p.s.i. to insure against leakage in castings and gaskets. U.L. listed (for 120, 208, 240 and 277 Volt only) and CSA certified (for 120, and 347 Volt only) for wet locations. Kim Lighting 9 Photometrics,and Application How to interpret and apply p pp y . CL photometric data. ■ Candlepower 3 206 1 000 i 0 5000 Candlepower The left half of the photometric chart is the luminous intensity at various angles in a typical vertical plane through the light center. The curve is symmetrical about the centerline in all CL fixtures, and is commonly known as a "candlepower distribution curve." Reflector or Lamp All H.I.D. lamps are mounted in either a Spot or Narrow Flood reflector (CL3 and 4 only). All 12V. lamps have integral reflectors, and are described by their bare - lamp beam width. This will change when the lamp is tested inside the fixture. Reflector /Lamp Position , CL3 and 4 fixtures have 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° Beam Width and Center Footcandles 3.5 5.5 �l I 40' 1 1 1 9.7 1 1 224_50% _ 8 25.6° m � o x u_ E 0 L u_ 32' 24' 16' Radius of Spot 4' 8' 12' 16' 8' CL3 -4 100W. MH E -17 Narrow Flood Reflector High Position No Louver height adjustment on the H.I.D. reflectors and 12V. lamps. Spot reflectors and ` 12V. spot lamps were placed v in the lowest position for maximum glare shielding by the fixture. Narrow Flood reflectors and 12V. flood lamps were placed in the mid or high position to allow full utilization of these wider distributions. Optional Internal Louver Louvers affect light output, even with very narrow spot beams. Selected Spot and Narrow Flood beams were tested with the optional Internal Louver to provide accurate and useful data. Use of the optional Internal Louver may limit ad- justments as shown on page 4, and should never be used on Flood beams because of efficiency loss. r � All CL photometric charts are divided into two halves which are symmetrical. The left half is the basic candlepower distribution. The right half converts the candle- power into data that is more useful in applying the fixture to an actual lighting task. See below and right. 11' Dia. 411. 22 1 1 88 1 I1 r ■` 50% 25.6° 24' Beam Width This included -angle is determined by the width of the candlepower curve at 50% of the maximum value. It is generally regarded as the useful beam width that will produce acceptable uniformity of illumination. • 'Center Footcandles Footcandle values are shown • on the beam centerline at various distances from the fixture. See Application of Data at left. In addition, the diameter of the beam can also be determined by the grid. Since the beam edges are 50% of the maximum candlepower, the footcandle value at the edge would be 50% of the center value. Application of Data The final objective is to select the CL fixture -lamp- reflector combination that will provide the correct illumination without wasting unnecessary light. All of this can be easily derived from the beam width, footcandles and distance values shown on the right side of all CL photometric charts. It is easy to see how a simple scaled elevation of the object will quickly tell you the beam width required. The following footcandle recommendations are based on Kim experience and I.E.S. recommendations: Object Dark Surroundings Bright Surroundings Trees 5fc 10 -20fc Flags 20fc 50fc An object can be illuminated with multiple fixtures from one side or many sides depending on the direction(s) from which it will be viewed. Example using data from above chart. Basic Formula: fc = d2 fc - footcandles cp - candlepower d - distance from fixture to object in feet. Kim Lighting 11 Photometrics CL3 and CL4 Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 30° 230p01 V ,4.3� 80' 2500 0 1 107 Radius of Spot 9' 16' 24' 32' 50% tv N_ 64' 48' .3P' 16' CL3 -4 75W. PAR -36 LV (Osram Halogen) Spot -10° Low Position No Louver I Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 20 °g0010° X1.9 / 20' See page 11 for chart explanation. See page 15 for lamp guide. All tests conducted with roundel lenses and clear H.I.D. lamps unless noted. IBeam Width and I Beam Width and Center Footcandles Candlepower l Center Footcandles 20A20 10° c4.0 / 30 30° 350 0= 6.3 / / ac / 11--- / 40° Radius of Spot 8' 16' 24' 32' 60° 70° 80° 90° 24' x 0 18' �i 25-/ - -c -12' 38.2° _° 101 6' / Radius of Spot 6' 9' 12' CL3 -4 75W. PAR -36 LV CL3 -4 (Osram Halogen) Spot - 10° Low Position Internal Louver Beam Width and Center Footcandles 75W. PAR -36 LV (Osram Halogen) Flood - 30° Mid Position No Louver Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 2Agp00100 14.5 1 30° 000 7 0 00 80' Beam Widtn and Candlepower Center Footcandles 36p0 10° 3.7 30° 3000 40° 50° '0 60° 70° 80° 90° 5.7 1 / / 30' 24' N 10 F- -ii 1• 8' / 231-29 W -12' 29.5° ). 92 / Radius of Spot 3' 6' 9' 12' CL3 -4 75W. PAR -36 LV (Osram Halogen) Flood - 30° Mid Position Internal Louver Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 2036p01 i X3.9 ! 30' 30° 3000 61- 1-- -24 50% 44 5.5° CL3 -4 75W. PAR -36 LV (Osram Halogen) Wide Flood - 60° High Position No Louver Candlepower Li 50% 40' 1 10.2 = 160 20' Radius of Spot 10' 20' 30' 40' CL3 -4 100W. MH E -17 Spot Reflector Low Position No Louver 40' 20' Radius of Spot 10' 20' 30' 40' CL3 -4 70W. MH E -17 CL3 -4 70W. MH E -17 Spot Reflector Spot Reflector Low Position Low Position No Louver Internal Louver Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 20° 10° 4.4 4900 1 30° 40000 6.9 4 °* 0 . 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 12 1 z ii 0 50% y 28 -9.3° - c - 40' N 1 � 00' 80' 60' 111 20' Radius of Spot 10' 20' 30' 40' CL3 -4 100W. MH E -17 Spot Reflector Low Position Internal Louver Candlepower IBeam Width and Center Footcandles X3.5 5.5 1 9.7 -/1- -- E 24' S 221-50% - v 16' I 25.6° m 6 I 40' 32' 88 1 Radius o Spot 4' 3' 12' 16' 8' CL3 -4 100W. MH E -17 Narrow Flood Reflector High Position No Louver 11 1 m N 18 12 1 98 I 6 1 Radius of Spot 3' 6' 9' 12' CL3 -4 70W. MH E -17 Narrow Flood Reflector High Position No Louver Beam Width and Candlepower Center Footcandles 20° 401 i X3.5 30° 2000 25' 20' d 15' 23-- 21.3° -10' 1 N 0 88 Radius of Spot 1 6' I 10' 5' CL3 -4 75W. MV E -17 (coated Tamp) Spot Reflector Low Position No Louver Kim Lighting 13 :riwkk�eE"lA�s'1:s4�o'c 4 r t4 April 28, 1997 Alexa Berlow Associate Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: L96-0084- Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Fort Dent Three Dear Alexa: In response to your letter, dated April 10, 1997, regarding comments on our Fort Dent Three proposal, we submit the attached for your review.. Earth Consultants, Inc. has addrssed the riverbank stabilization status and outlined their recommendations We are in the process of gathering information to answer all of the remaining concerns or comments outlined in your letter and expect to have our response to you shortly. Thank you, Alexa, for your time and effort concerning our project. Sincerely, JOHN C. RADOVICIJ DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ecca Davidson JohnCRadomich Development Company 2000 - 124th Ave. N.E. B-103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454-6060 RECEIVE APR 29 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' ,"•• • '4.7. • ! Vq•Xi:.!iy.!•1; Earth Consultants Inc. Geotechnical Engineers. Geologists & Environmental Scientists April 25, 1997 E- 3007 -7 John C. Radovich Development Company 2000 - 124th Avenue Northeast Suite B -103 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Attention: Chris Scalzo Subject: Reference: Dear Mr. Scalzo: Shoreline Bank Stability Fort Dent 3 Tukwila, Washington Earth Consultants, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Study E- 3007 -2, November 2, 1987 Geotechnical Engineering Study Update E- 3007 -7, December 20, 1996 As you requested, we have reviewed subsurface information in the vicinity of the site and made a site visit to observe existing conditions of the Green River bank for the purpose of providing recommendations for erosion protection and riverbank stability enhancement. Currently, the river bank is covered with a thick vegetative cover consisting predominantly of grass and blackberry vines, with occasional trees. The bank appears to have a slope of about 1.5:1 to 1:1 (Horizontal:Vertical); however, the actual slope inclination was difficult to ascertain due to the heavy vegetative cover. At this time, it is our opinion that erosional protection of the riverbank is not necessary unless the existing vegetative cover on the slope is disturbed. If construction disturbance encroaches on the top of the bank, then normal erosion control measures, such as a silt fence, would be adequate. The riverbank appears stable in its current condition and configuration. Unless the vegetative cover is disturbed, stability enhancement measures should not be required. RECEIVED APR 2 9 1997 1805 - 136th Place N.E., Suite 201, Bellevue, Washington 98005 COMMUNITY Bellevue (206) 643 -3780 Seattle (206) 464 -1584 FAX (206) 74- 608 -60 Tacoma (206) 272 -6608 DEVELOPMENT •<. ;;5 ,, •F. s -C' �4 ` ?i' "s x;.'; ?'!• �k: bazw�k*:' %'!d^:'1'%kW2NA!'Sr�ao�G..l:iYi �.itL'1•�., 1$n. k...�. h : €i{ :,.46.� tiE< uzii :trti 44.\, 17 ,04,,MweAti¢4'4..Arar.•= 1 John C. Radovich Development Company April 25, 1997 E- 3007 -7 Page 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If there are any questions, please call us. Respectfully submitted EARTH CONSULTA Kyle R. Campbell, P. 514 -1 Manager of Geotechni KRC/kmI EXPIRES 111 t$`k6 Earth Consultants, Inc. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director April 10, 1997 Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Co. 2000 124th Avenue N.E., B -103 Bellevue, Washington 98005 Re: L96 -0084 - Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Fort Dent Three Dear Rebecca: Your proposal to build Fort Dent Three office building and related amenities in the adjacent river environment, at 6860 Fort Dent Way in Tukwila, Washington has completed internal review. The following comments to your proposal must be addressed prior to issuance of your building permit: Planning • Provide a site plan showing exact distance of proposed development from the river, measured on a horizontal plane from the mean high water mark. The river environment management zone must be a minimum of 40 feet (TMC 18.44.130). Access roads, parking, and storage areas are prohibited from the shoreline management zone. • Provide an illumination plan to show the effects of glare on the river environment. Specify low glare lights and more precise height of standards. Public Works • 1v kriverbank stabilization study is required. Any river stabilization deficiencies must V�.�� have the corrective actions identified. \U.� -- • A maintenance access easement to the river dike will be needed to provide King 11,10 1L, County flood control access for inspection and maintenance. ,uvt. • Project must meet flood hazard reduction policy and provide 7 day 100 year flood �U t j storage 1'v\'� * luYYki w i L96 -0084 Fort Dent Three Page 2 • Supporting calculations required as part of sewer detention /flood zone control permit. Indicate whether storage will be placed at Fort Dent II or Fort Dent III Parks and Recreation • A Trail Easement Agreement runs with the land adjacent to the river that holds the City responsible for maintaining the trail, from the edge of the private property to the water. The private property owner (developer) will be required to provide a two (2) foot wide "safe zone" shoulder and to maintain the shoreline management zone areas and equipment up to the land side edge of the trail, including benches, picnic tables, fixtures, and associated landscaping. Design specifications for fixtures and amenities must be coordinated with the Department of Parks and Recreation, as their placement will be a critical safety issue to trail users. Points of Information • As a general comment to the proposed development, the existing sewer lift station needs to be checked for overload on sewer capacity. There is a question as to whether there is adequate capacity to handle impact of Fort Dent III. • The maximum width of the commercial driveways proposed shall not exceed 35 feet. • Conformance to city ordinances pertaining to fire protection measures and issues will be required for construction of the new building. Please provide revisions and additional information to me as soon as possible. A Revision Submittal Form is attached. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at 431 -3673. Sincerely, a Alexa Berlow Associate Planner encl. cc: Reviewing City Departments zP�ITiK +w.'.�i' +fib ?{r',ra?s?ai.`w ``lcGf;ashi ?d ai;k "JiS;tr Ni +'}�h`v!"ii�rir;i+`4�: .�1t ri4xikX'r�SlsN. t:ZZC iixi0WWe`A:z—i;V Se,�;+'.; "h 'k <rif Z I_- Z Ce W JU O 0 f/)• W J2 I- WO LI- Q .±. • a I- W Z= F- I- O Z I- W W U 0 O - O I- W • W I- FF-. LO Z W U= O ~ Z CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF APPLICATION PROJECT INFORMATION John C. Radovich Development Company has filed applications for development of Fort Dent 111, a two (2) -story office building with associated parking, utilities, and landscaping to be located at 6860 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila, Washington. Permits applied include: • Shoreline Permit Other known required permits include: • SEPA • Design Review Studies required with the applications include: • Traffic Impact Analysis 4 C 1 1 • FILES AVAILABLEFOR: PUBLIC:REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. Project Files include: • Shoreline Permit (P -Shore # L97 -0003) • SEPA (EPIC #22 -8, approved November 1990) • Design Review (90- 12 -DR, approved November 1990) OPPORTUNITY FOR-PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., Monday, February 24, 1997. You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at 431 -3670. Shoreline Permit -- Type 2 - Director of Department of Community Development Review For further information on this proposal, contact Alexa Berlow at 431 -3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: January 15, 1997 Notice of Completeness Issued: January 29, 1997 Notice of Application Issued: February 11,1997 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98138 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INF'ORNIATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I RPigetat DGLU id n (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on b etotaXti t I t'N7the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guide es were posted on the property located at f' tvO In% Wety so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property 'for application file number P-565 re ik.A7-elool ant (Appl cant Signature) a a V FEB 11. 1997 COIMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 7/ day of -.Lk./ , 19 .97 p00ooeo©ooao% moo+ touRire a :t3 S m PUBS,® D -20ee •o,Q OpW °° %e tot aaaaasweao- att.L6 .`ai. NO 'I`r RY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at . •� , U% /4- My commission expires on 7- ..30 GA) z re Ill 6 J C) U O` N O W: W = I--: ui u_¢,. =d. W`. z F-. 0i Z W U 0 i0co; ;O =W`. .L6 CY LLi z' U O z • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION - REVISED - February 7, 1997 Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company • 2000 124th Avenue NE, Suite B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (P -Shore # L97 -0003) Fort Dent III, 6860 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila, WA Dear Ms. Davidson: This letter is to notify you that your proposal to build an office building at 6860 Fort Dent Way has been removed from the Board of Architectural Review hearing schedule on March 27, 1997. Modifications to the design of your proposal per conditions of Design Review approval in November 1990 (90- 12 -DR) will be reviewed administratively by the Planning Division. Once I have received a signed Affidavit of Posting that your notice board has been installed, a laminated copy of the Notice of Application will be ready for you to pick up at the Permit Counter, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100. You will then need to post this on your sign next to the site plan.. If you have any questions about this revision or posting notices, please do not hesitate to call me directly at 431 -3673. Sincerely, Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 11100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director January 31, 1997 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Rebecca Davidson John C. Radovich Development Company 2000 124th Avenue NE, Suite B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 RE: Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (P -Shore # L97 -0003) Fort Dent III, 6860 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila, WA Dear Ms. Davidson: Your application to build an office building at 6860 Fort Dent Way has been found to be complete on January 29, 1997. The project has been assigned to me and tentatively scheduled for a public hearing before the Board of Architectural Review on Thursday, March 27, 1997. The next step is for you to install a notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. Information on how to install the sign is included with this letter. A laminated copy of the Notice of Application will need to be installed. You will soon be notified by the Department of Community Development that this sign is ready to be posted on the board. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you must return a signed Affidavit of Posting to the planner in charge of your proposal. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City to request revisions to your proposal to insure that it meets the substantive requirements of the zoning code and goals of the. Comprehensive Plan. Your application will be routed to appropriate departments for internal review, and any revision comments made back to you within 21 days of this notice, by February 19, 1997. If you wish to speak to me sooner than our response date, please feel free to call me directly at 431 -3673. Sincerely, a Alexa Berlow Associate Planner cc:? Reviewing City Departments 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 z Z Ce w', J U C0 t CO 0. CO w Li/ x; 0 w o° g -J F- 0 Z 0 N:_ 0 I- Wa H _z • 0 co: Z FERRARI DESIGN GROUP ARCHITECTS, PS Ms. Alexa L. Berlow City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: FORT DENT III AMENDMENT TO BAR APPROVAL FILE NO. BAR 90 -12 -DR FDG PROJECT NO. 96135.00 Dear Ms. Berlow: January 14, 1997 This letter is provided in support of amending our BAR approval for the Fort Dent III project. You will recall the previous conditions of approval for this project (90- 12-DR) cited in Jack Pace's letter of November 9, 1990. The conditions were as follows: 1. Conformance with Revised Landscape Plan dated 11/07/90. 2. Provision of river related amenities where the pedestrian access from our project connects to the river trail. We are confident that our Site Plan and Landscape Plan meet these conditions of approval in the following fashion: 1. Please review the attached copy of the 11/07/90 approved Landscape Plan. Our updated Landscape Plan (and Site Plan) have been prepared using that approved drawing as a basis. Plant types, densities and approximate locations are similar. Please compare the approved with the proposed. 2. We have created a strong pedestrian tie between the river side entry on the building and the river trail, and have introduced both picnic table /benches and seating in the immediate area of the connection as well as along the length of the river trail. In addition, we show a second u. pedestrian connection for the river trail at the building's secondary exit on the east side of the building. 3. We would further draw your attention to the use of lighting identified on the Site Plan to accent the project both on the building itself and in the parking areas. a_ 12277 134TH CT. N.E., SUITE 203, REDMOND, WA 98052 -2433 NVNki3333H )INVkid '8 IHOf13)IV1 NNA1 'H :S1031IHOHV Fort Dent III fait 2 January 14. 1997 We hope that you find this submittal responsive to the two previously cited conditions of approval. Please contact me with any questions or in the event further documentation is required. Sincerely, I DE .IGN ! ROUP, P.S. • rank H-ffern- . AIA Architect FH959/III January 13, 1996 Ms. Alexa L. Berlow City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Submittal of Current Traffic Study Fort Dent III Dear Alexa: Attached you will find a current Traffic Study for our proposed project, Fort Dent III. When I met with Ron Cameron, of the Public Works Department, on October 31, 1996 to discuss our intent to pursue once again the development of this project, he indicated that though we have SEPA approval for Fort Dent III we would need to submit a current study. Thank you, Alexa, for coordinating our Fort Dent III application submittals and supplements. Please don't hesitate to call should you have any questions. Sincerely, dovich Development Company becca David fd3city oftuk CeRadOVidl Development Company 2•' 000 -124th Ave, N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454 -6060 . , �.;, t�....,. cifs . {wi^.;zv,�r�i::<rt;t.��,:ri:.� ., ��s.. M. r..,�;H�b;= .�'��F:�t�:�,r..;n+: ., ��c�; gast4i�i�r` ���' �` 0„' �'•^ t�r�iS' fm��+ �.�7�{YA�Si:ii:'::S:Y:: ?i.:: -�T e�i;.;�s;�rk..,''=,7,,,.. . l4i December 20, 1996 Jack P. Pace City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Jack: John C. Radovich Development Company is now proposing the construction of the third phase of Fort Dent Office Park —Fort Dent Three. With the submittal of this Shoreline Substantial Development Permit we are requesting the ability to amend our existing SEPA (EPIC #22 -8) and Design Review (90- 12 -DR). Both were approved for Fort Dent Three in November, 1990. Any modifications to the building are minimal and, we believe, do not warrant the duplication of these two application submittals. We will be complying with all set forth approval conditions. In addition, let us note: 1. The building remains a two -story structure 2. The building area remains the same at 40,000SF 3. Parking and building impervious surfaces are relatively unchanged 4. The building footprint is relatively unchanged 5. The building height will be between 33' and 37' (equal to or less than the previously approved height) 6. Proposed color /materials scheme is the same 7. Compliance with conditions of approval will be strictly adhered • strong pedestrian/building/rivertrail connection • amenities for use of trail, such as benches, picnic tables, etc. It is our hope that administrative amendments to our existing SEPA and Design Review approvals is justified. We look forward to working with the City of Tukwila and improving our property in ways which offer a quality addition to the Tukwila community. Sincerely, • r e DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ecca Davidson Development Company 2000 -124th Ave. N.E. B -103 Bellevue, WA 98005 (206) 454 -6060 :ic,'t!u^",: merit'," s rr'!• xe- k���r;�+�,K' aft: �: s, 7%:: t, �. rriu6: �' e3ai+:+{k4at3 .0;;G,Fga,ih ta.. 6V? o �/�o ,. co .co w: w=, • JH; w 0• ga ua (a w; z� o la ,U 0` ;O N w W . _ • O'. uiz 0 I'",, z CITY OF ~°h KWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE - SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P- SHORE). ...:_ APPLICATION �E'�^q'>....•r...�ifJ'�W:si,.ty 4l:Gii� .`'r+J:.•�Yn'',. ^~i.:jC;;�+j :rs° +:S' . r (< ::if.:xvKi'.i n�.`.•. rti�ut tI, i:ki."n� ? ". `•i: >r" Y+yl7 .: : },::., %:FDR:`S�TA`FF.USEONLY�, .... _�� , .�'' �, ��.:a� . •:y�; �: >rr4�. ;����; .... .. � `._ ti .Z rrft,+;�;�a:•.nt tip, R eceipC;Niambert;,.x: • • �pphcatiorecdmpret • 'Pr0 ectFile:: SEPFile: 0<<_ ..Application incomplete ( to try c r3' ir.t'i I. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: FORT DENT THREE B. LOCATION OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: • 6860 FORT DENT WAY, 1 JKWITA, WA 98188 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 295490-0440 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED Quarter. NW Section: 24 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) NAME: REBECCA DAVIDSON /JOHN C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ADDRESS: PHONE: SIGNATURE: 2000 1 4M AVENUE NE, SUITE B -103, 13ELLEVUE, WA 98005 IIIMMA4Mr..01//..414 DATE: 2 • z F- Z 0 0. W. W z° Wo 0 F Z' ZF- F- O, ZH w O N. O F-: W UJ •H .:z v =. o ~' Z • r • CITY OF itJILA Department of Community Developrtent 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA Telephone: (206) 431-3670 SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL 98188 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (P-SHORE) APPLICATION ziEr$77, --.7-2mIkr-Ta*,.;*-.747"zr‘im014,eirer=f44n1.4**1.4:1*igjoT, arlaki ..ps4eisTrwiAroaciAirtrA.:Ars--- t4rAt jtVii?tt. :egr.!;.2; t,:ovemelboreirmermsr IC!!2nO11111; ' 71419.49!.:;....v..i, '"`,,1V-,,,' -,,.i-,7,:i: 11t,t. ::ieIF1... !i--!-•:‘1,g., 4 P,,,•,%M, " lU. ..' r en" §Tiri. e. l-4:ff' 1! . ,-- , J . 1• - :1 ; 7,:- ,..•• .7. *. • ,,,,.,,.:.y,z,„.A-.. .t q . -': • , ' - . ' -441' •• ., , , ,t` : , i- 1 ^ t ., 1O ., ,- :.0 ..,.,- r, ,.,r,.f.,e:r . .e .., . : . "'i., * , .• - ,A,.1,,. ,. ,..-:. ,:, .-,,.. li — e 1k**t 471;10140• meceipv maert . ,... .t5'..",..r,2p6...ir ,. ,r ..t;.,. .!11,,4,:.. . .',-,..• .....;.},:3.,,::,,t:,t ' , , A : . ,' ..;, ■,.M.,e.,-..y„-y..l .' ., 4 .- . 1 ' , --•. LAppliatoircompret ate122 j1, a4.4..a4ey z:t:t‘ 1 SEP/Fite i A-, --4 P ,.;,y. ., •- .- .-,,.g,........-p 5.-- ' i1i' tf?i , ..' =t.t...Z.u.i.-11 d - i." : , , tiApplib.itto'rwitileOnitircififf( 1. PROJECT BACKGROUND A. NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: EMT DM THREE B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: STREET ADDRESS: 6860 FORT DEM WAY, TUKWILA, WA 98188 ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 295490-044n LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE ATTACHED Quarter NW Section: 24 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your fax statement) C. CONTACT: (Primary contact regarding the application, and to whom all notices and reports shall be sent) REBECCA OAVIDSON/JOHN C. RADOVICH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ADDRESS: 2000 4M AVENUE NE, SUITE B-103, BELLEVUE WA 98005 NAME: PHONE: siGNATuRE: if I Ar Ae I • . . . DATE: Attachment C DENT III UNDEVELOPED PARCEL PL?11' SUPVE Y &.,, H G "--; < V/ :-, f�, ,r- ` ■■. t . -w . • �,.. � • G t_ rte ` L.:+Cri 6:: i-+., 2 WOE �'r; ✓r�t^.�L: G ~� M n;14 W- 0L'' G:::1 c, — :4 GO =�OcGnL. Q; 1.4 • • "L:ai� � zc % �W •�CD 4G CD. vWrr1 G E G O w srX�= ° " a��m Gj "uE-' .?www' • vZr1 pr-, : (y = Gzci - 14 L.= +c:c:.'-'E-. r:- L+W " = e", 1.,:i O a r'r\:rC wC, _ _ r~• a7. _ ,. • �- _ r .i L. .^ �. �. •.. r r . L. .- C. : i^: t.`(• r1.. iYoa:: �:: xtii'% ti�tidi:: tSUAa';{ 4.... �,.'' ti�.. x,.' �•' i' i' 2^ e1L' kv.w• L' rS. iSiYi<, �v` 4ev .}�S✓vntw?niYY.�.�'i4�:3�;1F�3� t' f : Y y.�ii.• ^ <a.'• ,�1'y�..p. N`" .c;•� ,r tP�, :'y� "o'�,if. • 4 D. PROPERTY OWNER DECLARATION The undersigned makes the following statements based upon personal knowledge: I am the current owner of the property which is the subject of this application. ▪ All statements contained in the application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. The application is being submitted with my knowledge and consent. I understand that conditions of approval, which the City and applicant have jointly agreed may not be completed prior to final approval of the construction (e.g., final building permit approval), will be incorporated into an agreement to be executed and recorded against the property prior to issuance of any construction permits. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Washington and the United States of America that the foregoing statement is true and correct. EXECUTED at BELLEVUE DECEMBER 19, 1996 , 199 (city), WASHINGTON (state), on (Signature) C. (Print name) Use additional sheets as needed for all property owner signatures. ADRVCKLT.DOC 7/3/96 ......n �>• ^•'YV; ;?7.:fi�tR;�.i.',:: k"..✓.idzert. ?wC3l��'+txiT„1; 4p: rSi..c*x'GriYQ.°.�X1;aPi g 4.i�7,'Taraiit : L'•UIMIr "v M71? 2i • Z re J U. UO CO w w =; J , CO LL w O: LL. Q D. °' mow, z �. F- o z uj uy w w; — O: Zi tll u);. • O H•. E. F' V CURRENT ZONING OF PROPERTY: REGIONAL COMMERCIAL £iLXE;D -USE F. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: VACANT G. SHORELINE ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGNATION: UNKNOWN H. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING LAND USES: (Within 1,000 feet in all directions from the development site.) FORT DENT TWO OFFICE BUILDING IS LOCATED -TO THE SOUTH. FORT DENT ONE IS SOUTHWEST OF THE FORT DENT PARK ACCESS ROAD. STATE FARM OFFICE BUILDING I$ ALSO TO THE SOUTH. HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL IS TO THE EAST. THE GREEN RIVER IS LOCH' TO THE NORTH AND NORTHEAST. FORT DENT PARK IS ALSO TO THE NORTH AND NORTHEAST. I. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST & FAIR MARKET VALUE of the proposed development: (Include additional future phases of development contemplated but not included in current proposal.) $ 4 ,100 ,000 J. BRIEF NARRATIVE DESCRIBING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY, 40,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING, UTILITIES AND LANDSCAPING. K. PORTION OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY ALREADY COMPLETED: (If any portion or phase of the proposed activity is already completed on subject site, indicate month and year of completion.) NONE • L. PROPOSED STARTING DATE: MAY 1997 . ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY: JANUARY 1998 , (If project will be constructed in stages, indicate dates:) • M. TYPE AND EXTENT OF RECONSTRUCTION OF RIVERBANK (IF ANY) AND PROPOSED RIVERBANK VEGETATION: N/A NO NEW RIVER WORK IS PROPOSED. N. IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY TO CAUSE FLOODING OR DRAINING OF WETLANDS, INDICATE IMPACTED AREA (acres): N/A SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 usnxv»•: iaCacYn 'tsCsiit2Wac3rcr&SiUe601 'S ._.try , e ar 4,, 3 • O. TYPE AND EXTENT OF PUBLIC ACCESS PROPOSED (if any): PROJECT WILL INCLUDE A SIDEWALK FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO THE EXSISTING TRAIL. P. SETBACK OF PROPOSED PARKING/LOADING/STORAGE AREAS AND PROPOSED SCREENING: (setback measured from mean high watermark.) SETBACK VARIES BETWEEN 39 FEET AND 60 FEET; PROPOSED SCREENING WILL INCLUDE GRASS AND TREES PLANTED BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT AND THE TRAIL Q. HEIGHT AND SETBACK OF ALL. PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES: (height measured from average grade level to the highest point of the structure, or mid -point of pitched roof; setback measured from mean high water mark.) HEIGHT - 33 FEET; SETBACK - 110 FEET R. MEASURES PROPOSED TO PROTECT WILDLIFE AND FISH HABITAT IN AND ALONG RIVER: RIVERBANK WIDENING WAS COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORT DENT TWO. IL TO BE CCMPLETEEI BY LQCALSHQRELINEQFFICTAL A. NATURE OF EXISTING SHORELINE: (Describe type of shoreline, such as stream, lake, marsh, flood plain, floodway, delta; type of beach, such as erosion, high bank, low bank or dike; type of material. such as sand, gravel, mud, clay, rock, riprap; and extent and type of buikheading, if any.) B. RESIDENTIAL VIEWS OBSTRUCTED BY STRUCTURES OVER 35' IN HEIGHT: (In the event that any proposed buildings or structures exceed a height of 35' above average grade, indicate the approximate location of, and number of, residential units, existing and potential, that will have views of the shoreline obstructed by the proposed development.) C. CONDITIONAL USE OR VARIANCE REQUIRED: (If a conditional use is required, state in full that portion of the Master Program which provides that the proposed use may be a conditional use, or, if a variance is required, that portion from which the variance is being sought. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 4 sLvtg 4iti, sy.*M -s4; AA.- ;: w,a 'AA +-at¢•APd t fr. ' 4' a3k' gssk 9 4:44.044)A9.4 . ' ii h,^ III_ QTHER PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT Indicate permits for which you have applied or will apply to the federal govemment, the State, City of Tukwila and other agencies; include permit application date, whether the permit is pending, approved or denied, and the permit number. [� Tukwila Conditional Use Permit • Tukwila Variance Permit ® Tukwila SEPA Environmental Checklist SEPA Lead Agency: SEPA decision date: ®• Tukwila Design Review ❑ Tukwila Preliminary Plat Approval © Tukwila Flood Control Zone Permit (per Flood Ord. #1462) ® Tukwila Storm Drainage Permit (per Ord. 1755) © Tukwila Land Altering Permit (per Ord. 1591) ❑ Archaeological Excavation Permit (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) ❑ Section 106 Review (WA DCD /Office of Public Archaeology) • Coastai Zone Management Certification (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) (WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife) Approval to Allow Temporary Exceedance of • Water Quality Standards (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) (Nationwide Permit) (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Aquatic Lease (WA Dept. of Natural Resources) ❑ Section 401 Water Quality Certification Nationwide Permit (WA Dept. of Ecology) ❑ Section 404 or Section 10 Permit (Army Corps of Engineers) PERMIT # EPIC #23-90 90 -12 -DR ❑ Other. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 APPUCATTON DATE DATE APPROVED 8/13/90 11/90 8/13/90 11/9/90 12/23/96 12/23/96 TBD 5 ..Eivu4IVfi %4#t. ,' »it ttUiii:'�-.hX�S idiu ' ?Xab a rY k't�Y�e'�1$ .4:�Jd�4i1�,�3o t? ilhr.�l�4tt'SZi 1:�" wt�: =ii1 v't!a' =t�}#ih7i � Yi1�'!'�f`1'ji `�'SF��kr�^ SF� � ' 't.�.in'',G�sSai�3::k r. a' ,,:� iii_'- Air; IV. IMPACTS QN SHORELINES: I OUcIES A. SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES APPUCABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Tukwila or King County Master Program sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES: A -2, A -3, A -4, A -5; B -1 -b, B -3; C -2; D -4; F -1, F -2, F -3, F -4, and F -8 -. KING COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES: PUBLIC ACCESS - OBJECTIVES 1.2.3. ald 5; CONSERVATION ELEMENT - OBJECTIVES 3.4. and 5 B. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICES APPUCABLE TO PROJECT: (List the Comprehensive Plan sections, goals and/or policies, including page numbers, which apply.) TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES: A -1, A -2, A -4, A -5, A -6, A -7, A -12. A -13. A -15. A -16 -n_ 4 -16-h, A- 16 -r-, nnrl A -17 V. SHORELINES DESIGN POLICIES All projects in the Shoreline Zone must be consistent with Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan and Shoreline Master Program policies (or King County's Shoreline Master Program if project located north of the 42nd Avenue bridge). In addition, ail structures requiring a building permit (except single family. development of 4 or fewer lots) located in the Shoreline Zone must undergo design review with the Tukwiia Board of Architecturai Review (BAR). The BAR's decision is based on design guidelines contained in the Zoning Code (TMC 18.60.050) and the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan (see DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION). The SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES and Comprehensive Plan's SHORELINE DESIGN POLICIES are summarized below. Note that more than one category may apply. In some cases, the goal for the use or area is noted to provide context for the design policies. NOTE: a) If your project requires a building permit you must meet additional criteria in DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION. b) If your project requires a variance, you must meet additional criteria in VARIANCE PERMIT APPLICATION. c) If your project requires a conditional use permit, you must meet additional criteria in CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. TUKWILA SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM POLICIES (King County shoreline policies follow) A. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT 1. Commercial/industrial development along the shorelines should not favor outside interests at the expense of the local population. 2. Locate commercial/development in areas with low potential for recreation or other public uses. 3. ?reference should be given to commercialrndustriai development that will provide an opportunity for a substantial number of people to enjoy the shoreline. SSDPMT.DOC 7/3/96 r3lanirttG+Y:xns;4 tiev asli; ebtliaa/ Pifff Altr 6 CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD, TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 98188 PHONE # (206) 433.1800 Gray L. Va nDunn, Mayor MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION /BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW NOVEMBER 8, 1990 The meeting was called to order at 8:00 P.M. by Jim Haggerton, Chair. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Hamilton, Kirsop, Malina, Gomez, and Knudson. Mr. Flesher was excused. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Darren Wilson and Sylvia. Appleton. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 11, 1990 AND OCTOBER 25, 1990 MEETINGS. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. There were no comments by citizens. 90- 35 -SPE: Groff's Nutrition Darren Wilson presented the staff report. He noted the applicant is requesting special permission to increase the size of their wall sign from 23.56 square feet to 27.01 square feet (15% increase). Groff's Nutrition is located at 359 Strander Blvd., referred to as the newly developed Southcenter Plaza and the zoning for that area is CP (Planned Business Centers). Darren pointed out that in July, 1990, the Planning Commission approved a special request from Cherie's Florist to increase their sign by 25 %. In the CP zone, the setback requirement is 20 feet, while Groff's Nutrition is setback 310 feet from the public right -of -way. In conclusion, the staff feels• that the applicant's request is appropriate for the following reasons: 1) It meets the minimum setback requirement in a CP zone. 2) The increase to 27.01 is compatible with the existing buildings in Southcenter Plaza. 3) The applicant meets the special permission criteria for approval of the sign increase and is in keeping with the intent of the City's Sign Code. Mr. Hamilton asked what was meant by the fact that this increase would be compatible with the existing signs. Darren responded that with the current setback of 310 feet, this makes it compatible with the other wall signs. He went on to say that staff's recommendation would be to approve the applicant's request. Asti a der: +elk . , • h 7r% 7 ri t s7: rte' ro- u Wi ;x.. - .a fkauas Planning Commission /BAR Page 2 November 8, 1990 Mr. Haggerton closed the public hearing at 8:15 P.M. MR. GOMEZ MOVED TO APPROVE THIS PROJECT. MR. KIRSOP SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. 90- 11 -DR: Texaco Jack Pace reported that the applicant had requested continuation to the December 13th meeting. The staff recommends approval of the request for continuation under the condition that the applicant submit any revisions by November 19, 1990 at 5:00 P.M. z _I: w: m JU oo cn w`_ J I- f' (O w. w O' 2 MR. HAGGERTON MOVED TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR N CONTINUATION TO DECEMBER 13, 1990 SUBJECT TO STAFF'S CONDITIONS. =C�. MR. HAMILTON SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Z H 1-0 z F- LU �o 0 I- ww u" O. ..z w F z 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent Three Jack Pace reviewed the staff report. The applicant is proposing to consolidate the property lines. Fort Dent II is in the process of being constructed. Fort Dent II and Fort Dent III will be mirror images of each other, but flipped in different directions. There were two general areas looked at in the staff report: 1) the general criteria for design review and; 2) Interurban Special Review. One area of concern was the building design. As mentioned earlier, the two buildings are mirror images of each other and, the applicant has rotated the buildings from the earlier drawings. There is no sidewalk connecting Fort Dent II and Fort Dent III. Additional landscaping is needed to break up the parking areas and to provide larger massing of landscaping along the river. One of staff's greatest concerns is that the current proposal has few elements which are sensitive to the natural amenities of the river environment. This proposal offers less uniqueness as opposed to ;;'the earlier submitted drawings. In conclusion, staff would ,recommend denial of this particular request due to the similarity of the two buildings, and the lack of sensitivity to the natural amenities of the river. Staff is suggesting denial of this request to allow time for the applicant and the staff to work up better solutions. The landscaping and existing access can be easily dealt with, there are more fundamental issues given the general design review criteria and the Interurban review criteria. Mr. Knudson noted that the similarity of the two buildings may be due to the applicant's development theme. Jack noted that there were other ways of achieving this, such as moving the building (Fort Dent III) in different directions. When looking at the beginning model of Fort Dent II and III, and the current proposal, the quality is not the same. tv;:�4t�� +ri:��1ti��e,.4 �::M`a':Ca;SF7 {:ki ;t "^ ini'ai .i:�z is.�r b.S� rri ixisfi'dtliiXt"c`�rl+ l'i d}itS�b&C -.3r. uli � ��w`ns"�F16iC':d `:( 3?t `!JL`w2tittlF i' '.A4<d fY«i's�E." �:sW' '. 41%44; iS"e'4i"`r`ts Planning Commission /BAR Page 3 November 8, 1990 Mr. Malina noted his concern for the circulation of parking, the parking stalls near the garage entrance and the location of sidewalks. Mr. Knudson asked why staff felt the applicant was utilizing the river less in the current proposal, versus the earlier drawings. z. _ ►_ re 2 J U• U O, Jack stated that in the earlier drawings there was a corridor w where the hill in the background could be seen. There.isn't any trio major uniqueness to the site. The backs of the buildings are facing the river. There are a number of creative options that could be utilized. <t, Katy Grief, John Radovich Development Co.: w, There is a tenant which is ready to lease 3/4 of the Fort Dent III z building based on the current configuration of the building. The 1-0 . z ►- staff report noted areas where the development was lacking, and we w uj . have tried to address as many as those issues as possible. One of these issues is the sidewalk connection to building II. We have v 0 added a sidewalk that connects to the front entry. Another concern o 1 was the parking near the garage. We've taken out three parking w W` stalls directly across from the garage, to eliminate any backing 3:0 out problems, and we've put in approximately 30' of landscaping u.0 there to create a point .. and-. -.- to_..be- ..._.cons.itstent. ", _wit�Fi the landscaping that.,. omems>o .Su.0tes is roposi_ng. Scotch Pines have v been—added to break up the parking area and�to provide consistency 1-` of plant materials between projects. With regard to staff's z concern for access from the rear of building three to the river, a walkway, constructed.of_yan exposed aggregate concrete will be built for people to get " • Mr. Haggerton asked what caused the changes from the first plan submitted to the current plan proposed. Katy noted that the first plan had many frills in it and was no economica_]lyeasible . Building• Two had an underground basement proposed, which was not feasible due to the water table in the area. We did not like the buildings oriented in that direction; the buildn_ i g focused nn- .eaeh- -other rather than on the site itself. Mr. Knudson asked what she thought about staff's suggestion of flipping the buildings 180 degrees so the entrance would face the river. Katy said that the emphasis of the building would then be facing the, river, where very few people would see it. She didn't feel they would be interested in making that change. She went on to say that the suggestion of moving the building closer to the river would only increase the parking area in the front of the building and do nothing for the leasibility or marketability of the Planning Commission /BAR Page 4 November 8, 1990 building. Ed Linardic, 1319 Dexter Ave. N., Seattle (architect for the project): He noted they were basically looking at two different site plans, the proposed two years ago and the current site plan. With regard to the first site plan, it did not take advantage of the view of the river. Also, in the first site plan, the entrance of the building was not easily distinguished. Mr. Knudson asked if the changes proposed by the applicant, given the staff's recommendations, addressed any of staff's concerns. Jack noted that the landscaping changes addressed many of the concerns. There are still the fundamental issues of whether the two buildings should be identical and has the applicant done enough to meet the design criteria based on the amenities of the site. Mr. Malina asked how staff felt about the applicant's revised pedestrian /vehicular circulation. Jack noted that their changes have addressed the comments in the staff report positively. Katy Greif stated that they would be happy to _ includesome. sort of "unique ness "_..or_monument:.to the.•site.,.,if_the Commission and staff felt those types of things were important. She also noted that they felt this building was attractive and it was not unusual for developers to repeat the same building design. The public hearing was closed at 9:15 P.M. Mr. Kirsop noted that the open arrangement, as laid out in the current proposal is an improvement over the original proposal. Also, it's not unusual to repeat construction. Mr. Knudson agreed with those comments. He felt the current proposal was attractive and not monotonous. He felt it was hard to take better advantage of river than was currently proposed. Mr. Malina agreed with staff's recommendation that more needed to be done to emphasize the site's amenities. He suggested that a plaque or something similar be placed on the applicant's property to identify the Trail. Jack clarified that staff was looking for direction from the Planning Commission regarding the design criteria of the site. Mr. Hamilton said that he felt the project design had deteriorated from the original proposal. He felt that the project had been pax. eo tx >.t.e3 } uk: 's;v ti' +7S S Sti:ciYv�t is aY33fff$1iti.Ati rQ ii(ft1.Hd3[Fdrklt:J! A FSti :E -,63t 6444,- Tea." -.4 •34 to r14114:&." • Planning Commission /BAR Page 5 November 8, 1990 modified in order for the applicant to cut costs, and the applicant and staff should get together to provide better consideration to the site. The original proposal offered more ingenuity and thought. Mr. Gomez felt the current proposal was a vast improvement over the original. • Mr. Hamilton reiterated his concern that costs had been cut from the original design, such as removing the courtyard. Mr. Haggerton said that he would like to see a more elegant entry or driveway into the site. He also indicated that he did not like the building layout in the first proposal. MR. KIRSOP MOVED TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR FORT DENT III BASED ON THE REVISIONS PRESENTED REGARDING THE SIDEWALK ARRANGEMENT AND LANDSCAPING, GIVING STAFF THE LATITUDE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE SHORELINE AMENITIES AT THE ACCESS FROM BUILDING III TO THE TRAIL. MR. GOMEZ SECONDED THE MOTION; MOTION PASSED BY A VOTE OF 3 -2 WITH MESSRS. MALINA AND HAMILTON OPPOSED. During the Director's report, Mr. Malina discussed a draft memo from Jim Haggerton to Rick Beeler regarding' emergency exit illumination for apartments and hotels. He noted that under the Uniform Building Code, emergency lighting is required for buildings where there is an excess of one hundred tenants. Mr. Malina's concern is that in buildings with under 100 people, no emergency lighting is required, and there have been recent incidence where people were stuck in lavatories. He stated that he would like to see the number of tenants reduced from 100 to 25 as the criteria for requiring emergency lighting. New construction and remodels would be subject to this modified criteria. This is a public safety issue, especially for the elderly. Mr. Kirsop stated that a new edition of the Uniform Building Code will be coming out for 1991, so at the time of adoption of that, it's a logical time to propose an amendment. The Planning Commissioners agreed to review this issue further and address it again at a meeting in the future. Jack Pace reminded the Planning Commission of the workshop prior to the meeting on December 13th. Also, there are plans to postpone the regular meeting in January. The,meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, Sylvia Appleton, Administrative Secretary R"3irTi<:e�drk,% :r,1.4, « tai #rzga'greds L•`w`k":s i'�°•r ••' N" "icxit*4i13 ti c • z ax �, 'hitzt:14441444$ 44.r sx.• 'o • ? ' i' as •z z re cu UO co a ' co w= J w0 j NCB. zH Z ,_` w p �, ww U' w z' • =;. 0 z • • CITY OF TUKWILA 6200 SOUTHCR'.VTER ROULEl'.4RD, Tl.'lill' /L.4, WASHINGTON 98188 • PHONE a 120th 433.1800 STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared October 29, 1990 Gary L. l'ufl)us'cn..Uhrcfn Imo: It I- 00 co° rn w, w it J.1-; N LL HEARING DATE: November 8, 1990 uj o : FILE NUMBER: 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent Three 4a LL a Q: D. APPLICANT: John C. Radovich Development Corp. i_ _;. ?f- REQUEST: Design Review of Phase II - an office park z F- development including a two-story, ry� w w' 2 °; 40,379 square foot building with an underground D °` co parking garage. 10 w ui LOCATION: 6860 Southcenter Boulevard, Lot B, Tukwila 1- c.? LL ~` o; ACREAGE: Approximately 2.5 acres .... �; COMPREHENSIVE o z.. PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial ZONING DISTRICT: C -2 Regional Retail SEPA DETERMINATION: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance, 10/10/88. ATTACHMENTS: A. B.A.R. Application B. Site Plan C. Landscape Plan D. Building Elevations E. Details F. Parking and First floor plans G. Second floor and Roof plans H. Fort Dent 2/3 Site Plan October 1988 I. Fort Dent 2/3 Site Plan September 1989 f,: ?:�• .s� ^���.�.+` i:1: S;..t�:; un>.n'�..Gb/<..�.'u -:aa tii5,^: d• rn:! TisKi�n; itk' �'+ r."— �e2�su.'-',.' A�i %i�a',°+::sC�� "r,..'�Y,'s.C�i* �t+ r?' tiae.- t ,dr= `,�i.�.'�i�;i!k «JYt3:f:tl�% r.n'r�:aeG:K.'�:r+i � !} �.:'� Staff Report To B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 2 FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION 1. Project Description The project includes development of a 40,379 square foot building with two stories of office space over one story of garage parking. The building is oriented toward the west with the main entrance facing Southcenter Boulevard. It is ringed on north and east sides by the river and river trail. Fort Dent Two is located southwest of the proposed Fort Dent Three. The project also includes development of associated surface parking, landscaping and a lineal trail along the bank of the Green River. Existing Development The lot is being used for dirt storage excavated from the Fort Dent One site. 3. Surrounding Land Use Fort Dent regional park to the north, railroads and industrial use to the east, vacant land (soon to be Homewood Suites) to the south, office buildings (Fort Dent 1 and 2) to the west. 4. Terrain The terrain is generally flat until the riverbank where there is a drop -off which ranges from approximately 1.5 to 1.0: (horizontal to vertical). 5. Vegetation Due to the filling that has occurred periodically in the past, no significant vegetation exists. 6. Access Vehicular access from Southcenter Boulevard will be shared with Fort Dent Two, Homewood Suites and the State Form office building. Fort Dent Three shares its eastern boundary with Homewood Suites. v . ...tea "n e,v4�c i= +t `M re �a , %u� `A0:4:an:a: , }ail 11:Veki,,;(9h17f3 i ; Klrte. a .:ri:.� ; ;Jiav;;.is ;r1 .,(, a �.* x', s: y, �h.., y..,; ��ia+`:!..l �trauiCiiiS l.f .��+xicr.w',l6i }i•vJ�uJ•at "s_.. ±tl'dwls..��.�:..:.ii,,.,K i�. • z i ►-` mow! • U O'. c NU' w W W =, u.. •wa,. 2 a; z v. mow, z �. • O U;. W; 1-V W ~' • • Zi •z Staff Report to B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 3 Pedestrian access from Southcenter Boulevard crosses the parking lot via a sidewalk. The walkway leads across the landscape islands, and proceeds to the building's entry courtyard between two parking stalls. 9. Utilities All utilities are available to serve the site. 10. Public Facilities The Christensen Riverfront trail will be extended along west bank of river as properties develop. The developer proposes to create a stormwater detention area with a constructed bench along 230 feet of river frontage. As will be done with Fort Dent Two, the bank will be cut back to create extra flood storage capacity during high levels of the Green River, and eliminate the need to provide the storm water capacity on -site. BACKGROUND This project is the third building of an office park complex. The original design concept was approved in October 1988 (Attachment H). Since then, the applicant requested modification to Fort Dent II. That request was approved in September 1989. (Attachment I) As part of the modification to the site plan, the applicant proposed Fort Dent II and Fort Dent III be on different lots. The Boundary Line Adjustment (90- 2 -BLA) was approved in June 1990. As part of the proposal for Fort Dent III, the applicant has proposed the lots be consolidated so that Fort Dent II and Fort Dent III will be on the some lot. This project is subject to design review for three reasons: 1) the building is over 10,000 square feet, 2) the project is within 200 feet of the shoreline and 3) the project is within the Interurban Special Review Area. The report format consists of two parts, the first being the general Design Review criteria and the second, the Interurban Special Review criteria. t")4 ti{ 9Y. t )i;iea°.3+?24'..4...4.6,.`! ,3.• >.Glitii�`:?:7ftt�2 +, w... ..... /:';z .. r�.. r...:li.`,;`S1o` +J.w • s.... i?i..,'x•,' iii.. 1.:•::= �; b;+ eslil� •�:a.•a:..r,.:s�`r`.iaaS„ viii*. 4K+ �ukut�: rili:$ d4`'+` Kl`+;t;; i�: 3b1' SSm, i:` r ,4��:v.rifO.i;Yl.FlG�•k;'!e.,. �abial,�.'s'>i�"r .4t�i�i?s. �tr,�' t?r. "a. z z. J U• o. U cn 0- co w: w= , JF. � LL w a: Z Z 0'. U� ON 0 1--, w, z ui U to 0 I�-? Staff Report to B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 4 1. GENERAL REVIEW GUIDELINES (TMC 18.60.050) DECISION CRITERIA Board review guidelines are shown below in bold, along with a staff discussion. The applicant's response to the guidelines is contained in Attachment A. 18.60.050: General Review Guidelines. Wiz.. w 0i U O, t .N0 W =' CO LL, w•0! (1) Relationship of Structure to Site. a. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with streetscape and to g provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movements. u. -tt; b. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the = Ci; visual impact of large paved areas. • F- _; With the change in plans for Fort Dent III, the parking layout for Fort Dent II is being modified in the f' 0' Z H. front with the redesign of the access road. In the earlier proposals, the buildings ere located in a straight I line. The emphasis was towards the river and the hills in the background. With the current proposal, the dominate element is building number three. U m, The relative scale and height of the building is compatible with the two adjacent structures by the same w w developer. A sidewalk from the Southcenter Boulevard leads to the project entrance along the main ?' driveway aisle to building number three. However, with the modifications effecting building number two, there is no sidewalk connection. til Z; (2) Relationship of Structure and Site to Adjoining Area. • 0 x' a. Harmony of texture, lines and masses is encouraged. Z.. b. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. c. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with eh established neighborhood character. d. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. e. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. Fort Dent III is similar in design to Fort Dent I and II. To the east is Homewood Suites which has residential style of architecture. Given the different styles of architecture between Homewood Suites and Fort Dent III, a better transition than meeting minimum landscape requirements is needed. In the current proposal the front of the building becomes the dominant element as you enter the site. Compared to the earlier proposal (Attachment H) the applicant has rotated the building to improve river views for building tenants. r .... , = �;�4,:, s �S:r...:::ia �., ✓.:r�r,?r;;�.,.. _.",.§ �1.2�naar.�uk+u..v 4eiaNi*Wa4%.= �kF.:iA. ?esl.,i;1su�x�.E'� • Staff Report to the B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 5 (3) Landscaping and Site Treatment a. Where existing topographic pattern contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. b. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. c. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. d. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. e. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. f. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accomplished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combination. g. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. h. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. The applicant has indicated groupings of Rose Bush, Spirea, Norway Maple along the river front. Although the groupings of plants provide distinct areas of vegetation, breaks still remain in the landscaping along the bank. These gaps fail to adequately screen the vehicles in the parking lot from the future recreational trail users. Flowering trees, shrubs and sod will be planted around the building's perimeter, along with Otto Luyden laurel, a low -lying evergreen. These plantings are similar in character to those at Fort Dent Two. The site plan (Attachment B) indicates the number and placement of "typical" lighting fixtures at the building's entrance, but provides no specifics about the appearance of the exterior lighting weather in the parking lot or adjacent to the building. A walkway leads out of the north door toward the riverbank through parking stalls to a grasscrete • maintenance access area. No specific landscaping is provided to set off the pedestrian route and lessen the feeling of walking through the parking lot. No specific provision has been made to lead the pedestrian from the building to the trail. The landscaping area opposite the garage entrance needs to be redesigned to provide a better transition to the Homewood Suites site and minimize the traffic conflict with the entrance to the garage. The parking lot between Fort Dent II and Fort Dent III needs some additional landscape islands to break up the parking lot area. In addition, more landscaping is needed in the parking area where the Fort Dent III sidewalk connects with the trail. (4) Building Design a. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to its surroundings. b. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Staff Report to the B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 6 c. Building components- such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. d. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. e. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. f. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards, and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. g. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, from and siting should be used to provide visual interest. Z _� w re 6 JU' U0 Nom; Nw. H CO u- w 0'. The form of the proposed building is exactly like the Fort Dent II building, which was approved in late 2 1989 by the B.A.R. The contemporary architectural style is unchanged, as are the building materials. _ 5' Three primary building materials include: tinted glass curtain wall on the entry facade, painted concrete u_ and painted aluminum panels. The primary color is a light grey, as in Fort Dent Two. Spectrum blue is = Cy used as an accent color. 1— _° ? The building's main entry contains a painted metal freestanding element (labeled "portico" on the Z O elevations). The portico feature is not included in the rear. The building's entry appears to include an uj awning feature which is not fully specified in the elevations. The mechanical equipment will be screened p and painted the same color as the body of the building. The applicant has not provided any information _ UO cn regarding the design of exterior lighting fixtures and standards. p E-: 2 w, (5) Miscellaneous Structures and Street Furniture F- a. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the ! p architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with j Z buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and U N surroundings and proportions should be to scale. ~O H b. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the Z guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. No miscellaneous structures or street furniture has been indicated on the plans. As noted earlier, the applicant has not submitted any lighting details. 2. INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW AREA (TMC 18.60.060) DECISION CRITERIA Board review guidelines are shown below in bold, along with staff discussion. The applicants response to the guidelines contained in attachment A. (A) Proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. If you were to fill in the river today, the applicants current site plan would not be affected; the dominant element is Fort Dent III. The revised site plan and building design contain very few elements sensitive to the natural amenities. The applicant's response to this criterion was "The building has been placed on site to allow views of the Green River and Mt. Rainier. The recreational trail will be completed along the site which will allow future completion on the trail system and enjoyment by pedestrians." .may .r +' r �: 1 +. ,� ::' i.'%iN:d}:r„8.�'rs'�.+iS!;t & i7'.'+' �s?; �YXd ?r'�]T�,��':3Yr:?2S, psi, 3alYa'&" �aa' �Cid" uiC: i3�ic:' �ikk�i[ dV i7' a' Ci? f! 46. Su6t' u3�iTf1 :i.NWAi 3r.i:3Wsna5 `4'd1. 7i#ifFi ?flfaX+ 1,,i,"sgr is''"4r .Y'SJa' +iii '+u3' it 'Sff .." '' 1011:1 a ': Staff Report to the B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 7 In the first proposal (Attachment H) there were design features such as the outdoor plaza and locating the building to provide view corridors. The current proposal is oriented to Southcenter Boulevard and the building turns its back to the river. (B) Proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. As part of this project the applicant will provide pedestrian connections to the to the river trail. (C) Proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circulation. Earlier sections of this report noted, that Fort Dent II has no pedestrian connection along the sidewalk leading to Fort Dent III. From the information provided by the applicant, it is not clear how this pedestrian crossing will be delineated. (D) Proposed property use should be oompsd'ble with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The current uses in the immediate area include offices, hotel suites and a county park. (E) Proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental impacts. As noted earlier in this report, the applicant will be creating a stormwater detention area with a constructed bench. In addition, the applicant will be providing grass swales for storm water treatment. (F) Proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. No significant historical features have been identified on site. The area in general was host to Native american activities, as well as the Interurban Settlement. CONCLUSIONS General Design Review 1. Relationship of Structure to Site The height and scale of Fort Dent #3 is consistent with the proposed and existing development. Improvements . are needed in the pedestrian connection and improved screening of large parking areas. 2. Relationship of Structure to Site Adjoining Area. Fort Dent III has several of the same design elements as the other office buildings in the area. This provides harmony of texture, lines and massing structure. Some improvements are needed in the area between Homewood Suites and Fort Dent III to provide a better landscape transition. Further refinement is needed of the pedestrian circulation system is needed to minimize conflict with cars. i✓.'+ 'A'..,Ft.`e x`itrtiY3S1.itttr``�"� d 4• x: t :1.rs✓�r?e+''.$iixL"- �'d4f x, �i, �:« utJt'^. G% SeS�n. 'is'k:Y�.v67�a.•.�1:it�rC�`a�` :: �a�: �.' �dF�' �FYr�ib' t��2i�Li �". rGI �. SX.«' d16y�: ti+ ��' i� x�n'rZi�5��Atlii��i'°sl4� Staff Report to the B.A.R. 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Page 8 3. Landscaping and Site Treatment The proposed landscape plan along the entrance road strengthens the axis to the entrance to Fort Dent III. The landscape plan does nothing to strengthen vistas and important axis to the river. Additional landscaping is needed to break up parking areas, and to provide larger massing of landscaping along the river. Exterior lighting details have not been provided, so design compatibility cannot be assessed. 4. Building Design Fort Dent III is a contemporary architectural styled building which is compatible to the surrounding office buildings. The applicant has provided screening of the mechanical equipment as part of the building design. Fort Dent III and II differ only in the accent color and "rotating" the building foot print on the site. There is a some degree of monotony of design due to the similarity with Fort Dent II. The building design is oriented to the entrance of Southcenter Boulevard. This is reflected by the "portico" located in front of the main entrance. That portion of the building facing the river, also has an entrance, but lacks these design details. 5. Miscellaneous Structures or Street Furniture No miscellaneous structures or street furniture is proposed. Interurban Special Review Area (A) Sensitivity to the Natural Amenities As compared to the earlier design, the current proposal for Fort Dent III has few elements which are sensitive to the natural amenities of the river environment. While the development now turns its back to the river and does little to make the river an integral part of the site development. Earlier proposals show several different opportunities to provide development more sensitive to the river. (B) Enjoyment of Public Recreational Areas The applicant has provided pedestrian connection to the river trail. (C) Safe and Convenient On -Site Pedestrian Circulation 11a, ' s4kc, ,- .434, 31.41. -. -cca;,i 3 .astat& ut*el st olVai161:41641 u Staff Report to the B.A.R. Page 9 90- 12 -DR: Fort Dent III Refinements are needed in the pedestrian circulation system for the following areas: 1. Pedestrian connection is need from the main sidewalk to Fort Dent II. .2. The pedestrian crossings need to be better defined. This can be done with landscaping and changes in paving materials. (D) Compatible Uses The proposed use is compatible with neighboring uses. (E) Minimize Adverse Environmental Impacts The applicant will be creating a storm water detention area and providing grass swales for storm water treatment to minimize adverse environmental impacts. (F) Historical Features in the Area While there are no specific historical features on site, the area has some historic significance due to Native American activities and the Interurban core. The applicant has not demonstrated regard for the historical features in the area. RECOMMENDATIONS There is an opportunity here for the Board of Architectural Review to obtain the design quality they have desired. This is reflected in the earlier submittal (Attachment H). Planning staff is recommending the applicants proposal be denied. And the applicant resubmit for the December 13, 1990 B.A.R. meeting, this would allow staff and the applicant time to resolve the various issues. Key areas that would be addressed are: 1) Provide safe and convenient pedestrian circulation. 2) Revise the landscape plan to provide better screen of the large parking area and transition to the Homewood Suite project. 3) Revise the site plan and /or building to be more sensitive to the river as an amenity. Possible solutions include: 1) rotating the building, 2) providing a small plaza between the river trail and building, 3) redesign the building and move closer to the river. 4) Revise the building detail to Fort Dent III to break up the monotony of design. a «,;I. ".. ::u�.'�riii:ictfi;fii �::. a.::" a��2�z�..:• °a,`i1`„$��3N��,n,..+...,..._.. • City of Tukwila PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433 -1849 MITIGATION MEASURES DNS for FORT DENT TWO EPIC -27 -88 If artifacts are revealed during earthwork, all excavation, grading, and fill must be stopped and the Department of Community Development, Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation contacted at 753 -4011, Robert Whitlam, State Archaeologist. An historic marker or archeological display will be required if documentation of historic note is discovered or per substantive comments of Duwamish Tribe during comment period, to be reviewed and approved by Planning Department. Construct recreational trail per City standards. 3. Dedicate any additional necessary area for public recreational trail and riverbank maintenance easements. Riverbank excavation shall be revegetated with native materials to be reviewed. and approved by Washington State Department of Fisheries. . S -04 -1995 3.54PM FROM JOHN C RADOVICH DEVE 206 453 9748 City''of Tukwila A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 (206) 433-0179 Ross A. Earnst, P.E. Director P. 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Pace, Senior Planner FROM: Ron Cameron, City Engineer DATE: October 17, 1990 SUBJECT: Fort Dent Traffic Mitigations This memorandum explains the process used to determine Homewood's traffic mitigations and applies the same process to Fort Dent. The considerations are the existing LOS "•F ", fairshare of the Southcenter project to correct would be "unfair ", and a compromise that provides for improving safety and capacity in inappropriate fair share approach. Peak hour trips are calculated as 13.6% of the 708 daily trips and that is 147 peak hour trips. This is from the Fort Dent Traffic Study. Previously, the Homewood Suites traffic impacts were evaluated and mitigation agreement made. That agreement of $50,000 was based on a $1,000 trip fee. There were several considerations in reaching this agreement.• 1. The Homewood proposed mitigations of signal improvements were already being provided by WSDOT. Z. The City's project to increase capacity for the immediate intersections is estimated to cost over $11,000,000 which is significantly more than a "normal' intersection capacity, improvement cost. 3. The immediate Interurban intersections with Grady Way and Southcenter Boulevard are at LOS "F" and capacity improvements to work with the existing network and future network should be evaluated. 4. The proportionate share of the $11,000,000 improvement for Homewood would have been $110,000 which is disproportionate in relation to other development mitigation costs. Therefore; considering other mitigation costs of the immediate area, King County and Bellevue's fees of $1,000 a trip, and the severe existing LOS "F" problem, a fairshare cost of a study to determine "immediate" capacity improvements was agreed to. z W, oo W =_ w0 g a.u- �W' Z z 1 -' U co w w' O. z: W u. � o. z ' • '5- =ad -1995 3 : 55PM Jack Pace MEMORANDUM October 17, 1990 Page 2 FROM JOHN C RADOVICH DEVE 206 4.53 974.0 z _ 14. 1-Z, 5. The "immediate" improvements are envisioned as widening the no w, Interurban Avenue bridge to provide dual left turn lanes that 6 5` will serve "immediate" LOS `needs and work with the future -'o' improvement AND sidewalks, for pedestrian safety. Both LOS and N o' pedestrian safety will be affected by increased Homewood vehicle w w and pedestrian traffic. ; _.11... 6. Fort Dent is essentially in the same position as Homewood; Lui q 1. vehicle and pedestrian traffic will further degrade safety 5 and capacity; 2. the major City project is still several years u. .c •• away and significant cost; 3. a fair share for the widening of v; Interurban bridge should be commiserate with other mitigation w; costs - i.e., not exceeding the costs determined by Bellevue, z 1-` King County, and being paid in Tukwila for traffic improvements_ z o 7. The costs for Fort Dent's 147 trips. (about 3 tunes the 50 of g j' Homewood) would be. S147,000. o olto lo 0 F-`. w w', •s 1-- 0- z. 8. That mitigation would be used for the evaluation of widening Interurban bridge and approaches for dual lefts and pedestrians. If the study and work is not underway within 5 years, the funds could be used for the Southcenter Boulevard project. If that project is not underway, then, it could be used for other capacity and safety improvements to Interurban (Southcenter - Grady), if none are in progress, then, the fees retVrned to Fort Dent. This is the same understanding developed for Homewood. "77: RC /k jp �• File: Development. File - Fort Dent III _,�..___... .. Homewood Suites • • • • .��e;';C't;Z .;i�t, "' ✓.�yt�:3�ri4,t. i•?��::t:ri:I...a` �: 'k 'fr.`�:f4.t'Imar,w;:"F.Salcaax'S. learn ," v, P. 2 A‘e . aftWijr--- jSf9 4:7 4r4c1' a ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Control j. Epic File NO. AMENDMENT Ta #23 -90 Fee $ 325 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FORT DENT THREE 2. Name of applicant: JOHN C. RADOVICH 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: AMENDMENT PREPARED JUNE 20, 1997 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): CONSTRUCTION START SUMMER 1997; COMPLETION WINTER 1998 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A MITIGATED DNS WAS ISSUED (1N THIS SITE FOR A SIMILAR OFFICE BUILDING PROJECT 10/25/88 (FILE NO. 88 -3 -SMP) AND AgATN IN 1990 kFILE NO. 90 -6 -SMP). DESIGN REVIEW (FILE NO. 90- 12 -DR) AND SEPA (FILE NO. EPIC 23 -90) HAVE ALSO BEEN PREVIOUSLY ISSUED ON THIS DEVELOPMENT 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. -2- Ri ECER/ED JUN 23 1997 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. - DEVELOPMENT OF A 40,000 SQUARE FOOT CLASS A OFFICE BUILDING ON TWO ACRES OF LAND AS PHASE THREE OF FORT DENT OFFICE PARK. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, .if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? -3- ru `T �n±e4r:a .4.:11; r it :', idsI,g).7 =PM61,'yii7i %r:: leFgF6,:.&.?T Ile1,6n 4 =vTi'S ,WYMriMETi9 .0cli o, WT JV't3YfRP: tC fJ emo. • • TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. (d' Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. NO, HOWEVER FORT DENT TWO WAS BUILT ON PILES. FORT DENT THREE WILL HAVE CONVENTIONAL CONCRETE SPREAD FOOTINGS. ,e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 71% -4- mow: 6 J U 0O- 0 U)w; 11J -11-; ;v) u. w .0. g. J: w; z 0 11J uj •z ��. 0 ;O co 0 H,. ri - O: uiz Ni O 1-�. z 2. Air Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: PROPOSED EROSION OONTROL MEASURES WILL INCLUDE FILTER FABRIC FENCES, INTERCEPTOR SWALES, CHECK DAMS, CATCH BASIN PROTECTION, AND ROCKED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A PORTION OF THE BUILDING, PARKING LOT AND LANDSCAPING WILL BE.,'CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 200' OF THE GREEN RIVER. THIS WORK WILL INCLUDE EXTENSIONS OF THE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. NO WORK IS ANTICIPATED WITHIN THE SURFACE WATER OR WETLANDS OF THE GREEN RIVER. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. -6- X3'4.`.. :a " "J;kr. "x1. F'2'iir'd'.ir'- '- ^',eNr1?n :ar,:F §ttikiE•�t. - . , ` v.�`•,kc f.. 41�f�.rx.) • id+.".' z; Yl is�• ie.' w'ikf`..ai�:35:fL�•�:•l' ;:aauti: ' i" iirt i`. t. ��4,ir.,.,..tit"�,'<r`,a"C.xsd!t Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Water Runoff (including storm water): z ice. U N 0:.. cnw W I J �< ALL; w O• = dr f- w F-0 LLI z �! N wuj LI H V; O U =' Describe the source of runoff (including storm z1- water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. minim RTTNOFF WILL BE DIRECTED TO GRASS LINED SWALES THAT WILL OUTLET TO N TND, OUND,PTPE WHICH WILL BE CONNECTED TO AN EXISTING PIPED STQRM SXSTEM Tn THE SOUTH THE EVENTUAL OUTLET IS THE GREEN RIVER. -7- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the, site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain — wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation . What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. -8- :'kAw.:u? tsGtr,mi :s. i x• ' 4', tAikt3+'0 • .` %;uYdRX4 1ti:' W; JU; • • UO; co p; • co w: w = •co w O; 'LL Q ±w; • Z � H O: Z )—' • • fo �, w w' • H V; ui z;.. = Z Evaluation for Agency Use Only (4d.) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A mini; IMPROVED LANDSCAPE WILL RESULT FROM THE COMPLETED PROJECT. SHRUBS WILL INCLUi1E- REUmwTG DOGWOOD, �CWZE WARMINSTER BROOM, ES A, rUxSYTHIA, OPTREA- AND- VTRiRNUM. THE E P��LLINCLUDENORWAYMAPLEKATSURA riNE, FLOWERING CHERRY AND FLOWERING PEAR. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: -9- w ce c . oO; cY � Ww N LL' w o' 1.-t Nd F="w; Z .w w; o-i w w.. H V • • • z U N'. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: . Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: -10- Evaluation for Agency Use Only .. '' *`'J �Pi..ra�'ry ..- •:.,�•r i•�`r'��: 1Fy7'.,Aa b :'s, ... ;, yf r..,, 5a:: z • • F-Z mow, 10 U O' co 0 w i`, J H uJ 0, • 5 g J lLQ, ND.. Z�; I- O z ►-: U; Ca 1_._. W W LI O: Z; O ; z. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. Land and Shoreline Use Evaluation for Agency Use Only What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? THE SITE IS CURRENTLY VACANT LAND. THE GREEN RIVER AND FORT DENT PARK LIE TO THE NORTH AND WEST. FORT DENT TWO OFFICE BUILDING LIES TO THE SOUTH. HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL IS TO THE SOUTHEAST. STATE FARM INSURANCE HAS AN OFFICE BUILDING TO THE SOUTH. b. the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. YES, MORE THAN 30YEARS AGO THE PROPERTY WAS USED FOR VEGETABLE FARMING. c. Describe any structures on the site. ;tr., ,,. f ":iZ.. Y'rL'. i• -tiiarv• zai:ll�a ";':h ..•r+.�/: ti Nti.. . :.WIfiVIM iTIi V tl IVIS 0a 4=12rZi: f+TL:.17)77xri�dF7�,��n Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? What is the current zoning classification of the site? MUD REGIONAL r MMERITAT. MTXTn TrSE f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or. reduce displacement impacts, if any: Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: THE PROPERTY WILL B nEVFT,OPEn TN Arr.ORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA REGIONAL COMMERCIA : MIXED USE ZONTNG REGTTLATTONS • -12- ,+, rrrr' 1i% �:1Ai ? ri+a;teav:iti 0riu: i{ M�itif� .�e,a�'iv.�is*ik.i4x.`Y;�t.'�: 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. Aesthetics What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? FORT DENT THREE, AT ITS TALLEST POINT, WILL BE 33FEET, 27 FEET EXCLUSIVE OF THE HVAC UNIT AND SCREENING.. PRINCIPAL BUILDING MATERIALS WILL BE PAINTED DRIVET OR TILT -UP CONCRETE, REFLECTIVE GLASS, VISION GLASS AND BLUE COLORED ACCENTS ON THE METAL PANELS. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL -HAS -BEEN OBTAINED (FILE NO. 90- 12 -DR) .-J U 00 .0. w; w0 N _. z�. zo 1- U-1 w,.. •:0E ww 1- V- W ~ O: ui Z, z 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? THE PROJECT STTE WILL BE ILLUMINATED AS_NEEDED BY LQW GLARE LIGHTS ON 10 -20 FnnT STANDARDS, AS WELL AS GROUND- MOUNTED UP LIGHTING OF THE BUILDING AND RTTTT,DTNG- MOUNTED DOWN LIGHTING. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities s are in the immediate vicinity? FORT DENT PARK IS ADJACENT TO THE STTE_ THE GREEN RTVER REOREATTQNAL TRATL HAS BEEN DEVELOPED ADJACENT TO THE STTE. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: THE GREEN RIVER RECREATIONAL TRAIL BORDERS THE PROJECT. BENCHES AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPING WILL BE ADDED ALONG THE TRAIL TO ENCOURAGE ITS USAGE. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. Transportation Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. INTERURBAN AVENUE SOUTH AND FORT DENT WAY SERVE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ACCESS THE THESE STREETS IF FROM A 20 FOOT INGRESS /EGRESS EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE WHICH IS SHARED BY FORT DENT TWO, FORT DENT THREE AND HOMEWOOD SUITES HOTEL. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? (C.,) How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 142_ STALLS ARE PROPOSED TO SERVE FORT DENT THREE. ADDITIONAL PARKING IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT AT FORT DENT TWO. NO STALLS WILL BE ELIMINATED. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. THE DEVELOPMENT OF FORT DENT THREE WOULD GENERATE 707VEHICULAR TRIPS PER DAY. . Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. . Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. -16- z re 1-w. D V:. UO, CO 0 W W=; —111— N W; W }Or D. a: =W z �. z o,. W: V O N: 0 H,. Ww V_ U. H' O, z W co r ^. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. SANITARY SEWER;AND WATER ARE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA. A WATER EXTENSION WILL BE LOOPED AROUND THE BUILDING AND A NEW SEWER LATERAL WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS BY PUGET SOUND ENERGY AND TELEPHONE IS BY US WEST. EXTENSIONS OF THE EXISTING SERVICES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE NEW BUILDING. C. Signature The above answers my knowledge. I relying on them to Signature: Date Submitted: are true and complete to the best of under.stt-Ind Kat the leg agency is mak%itsdd'sio .� ,l / >10 <,J AMENDMENT SUBMITTED JUNE 20, 1997 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. J mow: J h-. u. w o' 1- w. z w w. 'D w; U w z` UN • z At OP ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instruction for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. The City uses this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring prepara- tion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise infor- mation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply ". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shore- line, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the City staff can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The City may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Nonproject proposals refer to actions which are different or broader than a single site specific development project, such as plans, policies and programs. Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the supplemental .sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. IJ?Verf.4)i Yfemeer. WaRO1N4. z w fY UO LU LU. J1: CO IL w0 g a`. V- a Z F..; Z o LU CV o �' 3 I- ww I 01 ~ wO wz 0 z Con. ,1 No. Epic File No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Fee S leev90 Receipt No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fort Dent Three 2. Name of applicant: John C. Radovich 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: John C. Radovich or Katie Greif 4. Date checklist prepared: August 13, 1990 5. Agency requesting Checklist:. City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction start Spring 1990, Completion Fall 1990, 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A mitigated DNS was issued on this site for a similar office building project on October 251988 (File No. 88 -43 -SMP). 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. Not known. -2- Z Z, JU C.).0; CO 0: CO W • W 2, W u_: • O" J' CO Fut Z� F- O. Z Dp. ,0 col • W W: 1--U LL O, ar co, O Z 1 IMP 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Board of A jli tecteral RPyjeyL prnv�L, ShnrP1 i ne lisp perms r, FislosiZone_ _Cma'ro1 permit, City of Tukwila Utility nd_Buildina an_cl_Q=p y p�rniJJ ,__ jtycl aul ic. permit - Deot, of 1ish m" 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Development of a 01,179 square foot Class o f ce�bs� Jsijstg_on twsLact s. o _..__ land as_phase three of Fort Dent Office Farj 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. A ,portion of Lot 2,_ Short Plat No. 79 -7 -55 according to _Shat_plat Snrv.ey re- corded under King Co, Recordinp_No. 7908210370; City of Tukwila, Zing County Washington. The site is located at th'north end of Southcenter Blvd.. north- east of_proposed Fort Dent Two. Address for the building_is 6860 Southcenter Boulevard. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, the Green River borders th4proper y on the north and east. -3- ti >;y,,.,.;sF, r <1>'wrki ' v: "'+%r�;•:.ii ',F��Si ��tiw.:,:s�x;:,:�.:;, lr,:i its =r-Y+ Y�.�`a'ri • ns:,,.�!r-, Mtn: w.,��,F:e'k..hti.ks a;s azLr •:3::,.,.: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPL �'NT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? .08% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gray and brownish silt of loose to medium density._ d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, however, both Fort Dent Two and Fort pant ThrPP will be built on piles. Evaluation for Agency Use Only e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Grading will be condug. si to balance the site. No major fill or excavation is PxpPrrPi nn site. However, excavation will occur along rhP_zivar bank in accordance with proposed civil engineering plans. U. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minimal erosion could always occur'on a ranstrtictiom site, however, erosion control methods in arrnrd nrn. with City of Tukwila standards will be observed _ About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 68% -4- z i W uuI -J U, VO CO CO w W =. CO w; w O g, u.< ►_- w, z �! Z I-` uj O w = V; O; Z' lb co; O ~' z ID • f. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other irnpacts to the earth, if any: A11 app onriate_ measures wi1-1 betaken_to minimize_runojf. . 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust from earthwork and vehicle emissions during construction, vehicle emissions only after completion. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other irnpacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River borders the property to the north and east. -5- Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. A portion of _the builcUng, landscaping and parking will be constructed_ within 200 feet of the Gren_River.e�ris� bank adjacent to the praiQct will be excavatacL to eate a slope and bench which will allow additional flow capacity in the river. . 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. _Approximately_i) 50_cubic yards of_materjal will be semoyed from the bank of the Green .Riyeri 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No withdrawals are required. Surface storm water will be channeled and collected by means of an approved storm water drainage system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Possible runoff from parking lot areas could occur but runoff will be channeled through biofiltration swales prior to entering the river. 1 Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Nn_ 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not applicable. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water _will be run through grass lined swales then into an undeground_pipe where water will be conveyed to the south into an existing. system and Southcenter Blvd. 'i;;.ri.r �.� ,.iti:, fie:. " .ii�.G+is�r:'S:��c:'�S`a,�,:� .;�:;ivi"t'A".."."-' �s.,.i- a.vs., .. r.. N•,.•....,.� •' �t t L QW. 0! .0 0: CO W w= .U7 LL'; uj AL. CC 92 a Z w I- o Z I-, 0: cri 0 1- W W: H V, ti 0! Zi CU O H, • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. SQ1u automobi]:e related pollutants., may enter the stoim.._system from the parking areas, They are goJng. to i iuinim_ z.e Though through the use of bio,f 1 rra ti ut_si a1 eta _al_Lmater separators. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Se .e— Fagg -6, item 6, and image 8, item 2 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing vegetation wi11jie removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, -8- Ii Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A much improved landscape environment will reanll from the comp .ejeddprojetC._ Shrubs: Otto= .I,sty_ke1i_Lgure_,,_Rewe land_ Flax, _ Rhododendron,_ _Snow Lady_,_Jci113..te 9_ w_ exJ ,n:_P4.tentl:1l.a.__Trees; - -_ _LQndonYlanea_Sa ex GummWashington Thorn, Kousa Dogwood. Groundcover: Sod 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: crows, finches, sparrows„ robins, ducks. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None. fish: bass other: herring, shellfish, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Not known c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Green River serves as a migration route for salmon and possibly trout. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None -9- ti,^.! >i..�'�•rr ;rli r�:i;:erh�cS'4::i �i: ts1`' iiri .,iuL:�:.Sisv�ei�l�a`i.L'::; iii: 4Gdu= 4(:uii:.:xyG.iiir:: +: acs: �.»;;.«.. Tii.' t.' as' J�1. W. ��' ��m&, i6�gs:. rtas.# L'. �;; ca" uu3Ci�. tiiuYi�iXri ,'Gi:�TJa::if?'er:"J�.'0."'wiu .1:: bzZisi ;4ii 1 r Evaluation for Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Gas and electric, heatingy_.e1ertrir cooling -sy tAms- wil will .be utilized b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction will include insulated roof, foundation, walls and wi —lows. The rooftop air con itioning Z equipment will feature a variable speed controller and = Z, economizer to utilize fresh outdoor air when Q�1Qpr temp- w. eratures are acceptable. :E:. O; 3 ,N Os v) w a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire co u. and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, E describe. No. u. i'd; z� I- O Z 1) Describe special emergency services that might ? o;. be required. Not applicable. o ,o I-. w W! c)i LI O: 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- N; mental health hazards, if any: Not applicable. z . 7. Environmental Health • -10- a ev..�.. t ....r....e.1 x.�•.`+: ::i�`i3i.1.i�%�:v>:.'vt xxa, ?,a;ed:ite;J +iSit ?I1 isiW,`ikis..w,i11Gi +.+. ,LSe ?ki'a.C.w�M:tui?ilii' `'!L'�L'Y�v4 %�,u:Csa[I: 45aGiYk2a'n eila..C.Iro v ' iaiiit 5 "-. —Y� ^t s' aVairrtik 741:".=. r::—` a`"ia t'Siii5.kil.' iLr Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?_Nonei____________ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise resulting from heavy equipment and trucks may occur during some parts of construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to 7:OOam- 7:O0pmm weekdays. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently vacant land. The Green River and Fort Dent Park lie to the north and west. Fort Dent Two office building, soon to be under construction lies to the south. Homewood Suites Hotel Co. plans a hotel to the southeast. State Farm Insurance Co. has lust com- pleted an office building to the south. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, more than 25 years ago the._,property was used for vegetable farming:. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. . : • Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The Shoreline Master Program has designated a portion of the site as environmentally sensitive due to the close proximity of the Green River. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately 39J peQRl.e may work at the completed building. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. j• k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with. existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The propertj �sleveloped in accordance with Tukwila C -2 van and other applicable laws. -12; . .. _ .. , = % 1— • rt JU OO i Of •N W ' W XI , -: w o. u_ 4' Z 0'. . 2 o' ;O N? ILI 01 w W; Z`. O Z Evaluation for Agency Use Only 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Building Three at its tallest point will be1Z. ett,.. 28 feet exclusive of the H /A,C unit and screening.,,-____ Principal building materials will be paifed drizet_ or tilt up concrete, reflective_g1ss. visjon_g1ass and blue colored accents on the metal panels. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Not,1Q._ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Design review approval will be obtained from the Board of Architectural Review. -13- W: 0 0 w w =:. N.w wo g J' ._OE. w Z �! wu`, ai 0 N! • ;01-; w W' U. to 1 V. 0 ~. ,z Evaluation for Agency Use Only -11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The project site will be illuminated as oggdeLby 1Qw glare lights on 10-20. foot standards. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None . Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Low glare fixtures wif_.b_e_ utilized. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Fort Dent Park is adjacent to the site. In the near futurp the green River recreational trail will be developed adjarPnt to the site. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposed recreational trail will border the dejelooment. -14- .•z Z W :J U O., • R CO C3 • r CO =, J > W 0; • g =C. a: • N d. Z 1- I- W W • 2 moo. O W W` 'W Z; 0 .4 .., • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Historic Fort_4 t Park s__ located acress t4 iver to the northwest. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Fort Dent Park c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard serve the subject property. Access to these streets is from a 20 foot ingress /egress easement on the southerly property line which is shared by Fort Dent Two and Three and Homewood Suites Hotel. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not .directly, althnugb thprP is_a_bus route along Interurban,_Ayenne South_._ c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 1QZ_. le_are pr.Qposed_tn_serare_Fort_Dent T'hr.ee.. Addi iu p .arking islsaated adj.acent_tn thqproj.ect at Fort Dent Two. No stalls will be eliminated. ti:u':icY;�r.•L:i.,..,..v .•- ve5.au:L n;:"• 1: s: r^ Vf'l iJ•l it T:�dYt:.tiYr:L+IC ;.ukl::.•ivd�: , -15- .w.fi l'ti^ �.,'.'A':e➢k:� >mX1:,?s "K7' +:aidliiku "1.tidcfkt k�37S�S7i#2ia` St tYC�1fi(s,4:r1:'.Al:?:L1"b+i•k Yd :f{iGiA'ifi.ltq.... eigt'r,' 6.4,2,4 t / 1,;c 4,,R, z fw, 2: ) ;U O coQ U) w' =. LL= wO q�� LL Q; w' zF ZO., p 0 ;o1-:. w wi U: O z° O z 1 4. 'r i 1► Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). NQ e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. _ma__ f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Accordinz_to the Traffic Engineers trip generation manual general office type use generates approximately 17.7 trips per 1,000sg. ft. of building area. Approximately 708 daily trips will be generated by the completed project. Approxi- mately 12% of these trips occur during peak a.m. and 13.6% during peak p.m. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: Many of the building tenants tend to be outside sales people with irregular travel times. Use of public transit and flexible working hours will be suggested to tenants. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The completed protect could add marginally to the need for police 4n&1 fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None W re 6 n. J V' U O' 'co • W W` W � u. Nd:. 7 W; H- 6.. •Z 111 LLC D0 (0; • •0 4—I W !. V' UN O Z • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16.•Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricit , natural •as, water, refuse service, ep one, sane ary sewer, sep ;c system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Sewer and. .,_._a y cL by the_Gtty of Tukw ; amide sewer extensions and w4.te exteu ons will be_Lansrrurted. rlerrriral and phone service w i l l be provJ d e th . . h y uget Power and U"J Weer Connection requirements to these utilities t np nom at,� C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: August 13, 1990 PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. -17- • Con!. .1 Epic `r , No. Fee $100.00 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Fort Dent.Two and Three Z ?. Name of applicant: John C. Radovich : 1—Z, my 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: John Radovich /Katie Greif J U' UO 41. Date checklist prepared: August 25, 1988 co L, u0O: G. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Obtain all necessary permits for Fort Dent Two and start construction March 1989. Fort N c' Zd Dent Three to be constructed in approximately three years. H uJ z H 2000 124th Ave. NE, B -103, Bellevue, WA, 98005 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Once buildings Two and Three are constructed the project will be completed. F- O Z U0 N ;O . 0E-: H a u' O' l.. z;. 8. List. any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will z be prepared, directly related to this proposal. A geotechnical study was per- formed in November of 1987 by Earth Consultants. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?. If yes, explain. To the best of our knowledge there are no government arrinns pc.nding that will affect the proposal. -2- a: ytEiMw•x'L'4 %:%!i.A elw,,L:9Niilgein•tr: t,•SAW•. St�°tc.• �A»'1 $'�,t+iti5%�'�4 'ttiii• %ra§." �4`^ ;�%'`Yt�' ." 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Board of Architectural. Review approval, Shoreline Use Permits, Flood Zone Control Permits, all City Utility Permits, Building Permits and Occupancy Permits, for building shell, building permits and occupancy permits for tenant spaces, Fisheries Permit. - 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed use and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in thi. checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do no. need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. To develop two Class A, multi- tenant office buildings on approximately five acres of land within the City of Tukwila. Building Two will_be_5,065' sq:.ft. Building Three: 46,000 sq. ft. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. Lots 1 and 2 of Short Plat No. 79 -7 -55 according to the Short Plat Surve.y_recorsied under King County recording No. 7908210370; City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. The_property is located at the entrance to Fort Dent_Park nor.heaS.t._ of Interurban. The address for building two is: 6840 South enter $lvd., and building three is: 6860 Southcenter Blvd. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes, the Green River borders the property on the northwest; north_and northeast- -3- z •. Hz. U 0: cn w U-'; WQ q• LL Q` Z z• 1— ukui • 0 • oy •,o I- w ui z TO BE COMPLETED;'M APPLIC T' B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, o er b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Parcel 1; 50%, Parcel 2: 08% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Gray and brownish silt of loose to medium density. For addi- tional information, see attached soils report. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, however preloadinl; of the building site on Fort Dent One to the south was required to insure minimal building settlement. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Approximately 2,200 cubic yards of structural fill will be used under the building area. All other grading will be to balance the site and to facilitate a planned building elevation. Evaluation for Agency Use.Only f. . Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Minimal erosion could occur during clearing and grading, however erosion control methods in accordance with City of Tukwila standards will be observed. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 68% impervious surface -4- z a W 6 J U. 0O W = J H wo u. - d; Z o: Z F- 11J uj o o W w!. V! 0 •z; u' 0 -1--', z Evaluation for Agency Use Only h. Proposed measures. to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: All appropriate erosion control measures will be taken to minimize runoff. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Dust from earthwork and vehicle emissions during construction, vehicle emissions only after completion. Are .there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:_ None 3.. Water a.. Surface: 1) Is there any surface.water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year - round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe' type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The Green River borders the property to the north and west. -5- .�. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Portions of the building, land- scaping and parking will be constructed within 200 feet of the Green River. In addition, the river bank adjacent to the project site will be excavated to create a 2:1 slope and 1.6 foot bench area to allow for additional storm water runoff. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. An estimated 1.800 cubic yards of earth material will be removed from the river bank along the entire river frontage. 4) Will the proposal , require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No withdrawals are required. Surface storm water will be channeled and collected by means of a storm water drainage system. 5) Does the proposal lie within a, 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Only normal passenger automobile related pollutants should enter surface waters from the parking areas. Runoff from basement parking will enter the sanitary sewer system and runoff from on grade parking will pass through.g_rass lined swales before entering the river. 'i".'+- sip: 1 .':as:i:;z %;CrYf�>S4i`Ji:S'ri?: aSiF'ri�'' +Xna;;4nv":•r: '4;!;.£;3 `4 =.,Sitii9-irvk.:'8:e' dr. • Evaluation for 1 Agency Use Only . Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. No 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Not Applicable Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Storm water will be collected by an approved drainage collection system including catch basins, pipes and grass lingd swales. Water will then be outleted into a catch basin at Southcenter Blvd. and channeled to—the. Green Riyer. Expected storm quantity will be'approximatej 9 cubic feet per second. -7- so et Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Some auto- mobile related pollutants may enter the storm system from the parking; areas. Oil /water separators will be installed as well as the implementation of grassy swales within the landscaped area. Proposed measures to .reduce: or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: See above, page six — 6 and page eight — 2 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs x grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other x other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? All existing vegetation will be removed. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None .......`; 42i�. r.+„iii5� .... a..'.; ?::.,::�, drib: wi^!e Sa• isi. �: vd^ ui�:' riisk',:.;.:`. ui... :1u'.a::.d,:;:.�a.:.��.uaa,.e, w. Evaluation for Agency Use Only d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A much improved landscape environment will result from the compl.'eted project. Shrubs: Otto - Luyken Laurel, New Zealand F].ax Rhododendron Snow Lady, White Flowering Potentilla. Trees: Norway Maple, Sweet Gum, Washington Thorn,. Kousa Dogwood. Groundcover: Sod. J. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other• .crows, finches, sparrows, robins mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: None fish: bass other: salmo trout, herring, shellfish, List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The Green River may be a m iration route for salmon and trout. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None Evaluation for '''Agency Use Only 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor). will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be'used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric heating and air conditioning units will be installed. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Construction will include insulated roof, foundation, walls and windows. The rooftop air conditioning equipment will feature a variable speed controller and an economizer to utilize fresh outdoor air when temperatures are at acceptable levels. . Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could. occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Not Applicable 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Not Applicable -10- Evaluation for 'T; Agency Use Only b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Some traffic noise exists but will not affect the project. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short term construction noise resulting from excavation equipment and trucks may occur during some parts of construction. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will be limited to daylight hours only. • Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is currently vacant land. The Green River and Fort Dent Park lie to the north and west. Fort Dent One Office Building is located to the south. State Farm Insurance Co. plans to develop an office building on property which is currently vacant to the east. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Yes, more than 25 years ago the property was used for farming. It is not know what type of crops were planted. Describe any structures on the site. None Z Z; cc W . 6 UO N 0` COW uJ_; J I-, W}} g u. d _ Z I- O ZF-; W W' D O. O N O I- W W' U u,,` Z 1 Evaluation for '""'•Agency Use Only d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? C -2 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Commercial If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Urban h. Has, any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. The Shoreline Master Program has designated a por- tion of the site as environmentally sensitive due to the close proximity of the Green River. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Using.the building_depart- ments ratio of 1 empl.oyee_per 1.00 sq. ft., the project will include 550 people at Building Two and 390 people at Building Three. These numbers are based upon net j. Approximately how many people would the completed useable area and in reality project displace? None are quite high. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The property will be developed in accordance witqukwi.la C -2 zoning and other applicable laws. -12- Evaluation for !gency Use Only 9. Rousing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Building height for Building Two is approx. 43 feet exclusive of air conditioning equipment and parapet. Building Three will be near the same height. The principal building materials include painted concrete panels, glass, and metal panel accents. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Attractive architectural and landscape designs are planned which will require review by and approval or-the Architectural Review Board. -13- Z iv 11J; JU 0 0: N a • w; W =:. N L' W O. 2 LL Q' w i 0: z iO w:. r-• —0: ui z; :0 S21 01--, z Evaluation for Agency Use Only 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The site will be illuminated by low glare lights on 10 -20 foot standards throughout the parking area — and landscaping. The exterior glass selection wiTt Z be of a type not to exceed the reflectivity standards �1 for the City of Tukwila. > ~ W b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a u= 2 safety hazard or interfere with views? No o' wo. WI , LL: W o c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may g affect your proposal? None _. =0, Z I F- CY VI d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and . 2 al. glare impacts, if any: By use of low glare perimeter. U N lighting and meeting reflectivity requirements. X31.- UN z ` 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational oppor- tunities are in the immediate vicinity? Fort Dent Park and in the near future, the Green River Recreational Trail will be developed within the River Bend area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing. recreational uses? If so, describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, •including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The Green River Recreation Trail borders both phases of the proposed development. -14- ...., : } 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Historic Fort Dent Park is located across the river northwest of the site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, .archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Fort Dent Park c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Interurban Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard serve the sub- ject property. Access to these streets is from a 20 foot ingress /egress easement on the southeasterly property line. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not directly, although there is a bus route along Interurban Avenue South.° c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The completed project will include approx. 48 basement parking stalls at Building Two, 49 under cover sur- face stalls at Building Three and 271 regular surface stalls. Total parking will be approximately 365 stalls. None will be eliminated. -15- t. t. z Z �Q au JU .0 O' u) • .wx J 1" WO,. 2 J u W. ? Hi • I— O Z F— W uj �O N OF W w` • •H W O. • •z.. U N. _° Z • Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Sidewalks, curb and gutter will be installed along the street frontage. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so', generally describe. No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. According_to the International Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, general office— type uses generate approx. 17.7 trips per 1000 sq. ft. of gross building area. Building Two will generate approx. 1 150 daily trips and Building Three will generate approx. 814 daily trips. Approx. 12% of these trips will occur during the a.m. peak hour and 13.6% during Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- the p.m. peak hour. tation impacts, if any: The buildings are being constructed in phases. Use of public transportation and flexible working hours will, be suggested to tenants. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The completed projects could marginally add to the need for police and fire protection. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None other than payment of City taxes. Z • Vs • 0C t (00 tAw, 'wo . J' = 1w Z 00:, • oto, • :o i w ~'; • li• Z • • U =; • O ~: • z 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently av Table at the site: electricity, natural gas water,/ refuse service, telephone, sati ary sewer, septic system, other. Evaluation for — Agency Use Only b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Presently, sewer and water are available to the site and are serviced by the City of Tukwila. Electricity and phone service will be required and provided by Puget Power and Pacific Northwest Bell. Actual construction requirements to connect to utilities are not known at this time. . Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of ,ny. knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to mak it .decision. Signature: ` CG�J . •. Date Submitted: 9- g? PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE. re LAI, JU U 0: t No CO w; w =: J H u O j } J: ILQ.. 21 a F_ w, z z�!.. 11.1 uj 0. O co; �w w = V u. 0`' 111 Z" UN 0 H. Z TJ BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC ' Evaluation for —"Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To develop an office project of quality design and construction which will promote future business growth in the City of Tukwila and to fulfill a need for office space in an easily accessible location: 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Number One -22- 4.4V4,4. Sai, ii;,434SlerI.'�`Z4 e(.' i4 1^.'togr,,;,;�?t'K..s"&., :?'iAdi� ';,; e^ Cy} f'%tF14';4 :;�rl.e:s + �: 3v:.. �s. s. iL:, sys.,: im:: 3�= �•=: i' nrdaiiii',. v' �':» tv'inriit +'F:vi''i6i:::�.bxe,. �5•- .J�«iia'r�e•:r t}L- :�r'.if ins, T �;3ie rR�d z .o: W 6 J0: .UO0 w • J `CO LL: 0: QD. • = a 1- W Z W 2 p` ;off'`. 'O H` WW'. iey ..z, O z 7•• Evaluation for Agency Use Only Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? No Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Not Applicable ........ ... ..:�T „»...';t,. ^ w_.:d ±`.$r?l � t ::61a:.• ...,.:,`:4�:.'r,,fr..: x,i�'s �e_uiLt':a.x.. -23- ';7` n: :f' ;;z.:, '„1;•77.,, "i:; :`.. ,.. �53�nYr�2' ni•t..`r,. k£rri;��. t.,...U�w'.W. a. .R )�ii't, 'iu+;:.ii:e:..w . v t wii..r•'..x.�.'n;.'j+:ti£. �...,.: zY:lr�•:',,57Lri`. °::._.u2trt:'s ..+r....et�::5r rF �. r1. ,w W O}; • 1-- al, • • • W W • H U: • • V N' Z • 588'17'03E- 55.70' N73'24' 10 "E-65.68' N 66.39' 37'E- 113.10' N 58'47'17'E-157.87' N 55'39'53'E-64.93' N 48'39' 58' E- 58.48' N 39'2115'E- 91.49' FORT DENT PARK ENTRANCE ROAD (KING COUNTY) N 59'2445'W(UR)- 18362' �'11'E- 126. 05 , 5 A9- 2g 1�- 0tk: D 98 5 � OZ 'S`� � � 5.54'51: •t° 106A�9 °2- 1055 :. A20 3.v 555 g'5 5 . \A O 5p5 PARCEL 2 176, 621 Sq.Ft. PARCEL 3 319, 505 Sq.Ft. 547'32'38'W- 32.76' S 72'05'52'W-389.9V 95.23' 572'18'44 "W - 93.66' 564'02'45' W- 111.69' 5 58'26'46'W- 115.35' N 30°04' 58'E -529.33' --PIaE Boundary —547'20'51'W- 271.21' N 38'19'12'E -123.64 Found Took In pavement. 1' Iron Pipe with cop to be set. ;yam•- �N g M � \E � STA' 12? ''0.5 E�E �p.12 559 �- NV\ IA 005 kbk) .on 2 : Desigr,oted 20'RNerTroil as Tract A,1 revised Sq.Ftgs Rreds 243 6/21/79 ', DR. ,octet: Added 20' RiverTroil Dedication 4Revised Easement areal 2 :4/18/79: D.R. rl 100 0. 100 200 Portion of West 1/2, Section 24 Township 23 North., Ronge 4 Eost.,W. M. Survev Drawned I moron WESTERN ATHLETIC CLUBS INC. Checked Field Hook Number SHORT PLAT lob Number3 -246- 0101-21 -C1 ` Tukwila, WasFlinglon. �H & WILSEY & HAM. INC. ENGINEERING • PI.ANNINO • SURVEYING • ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS • 431 Simile, Bewk..rd resrt...r r.k.l1.. N..ki.etw 91111111 (X.1241 -2470 � .:; 41wwf#' "�.k1sl.,FE1tiQ+i t4#nty "15Fi.�.Y;s jY4d�% :'w�Yi��kKY.li':�!SY��re'M:IS': Fi1i• N'M1`h+N� • The sketch blow i • Company .assumes ments adjoining or The Comp ?'" has nct surveyed the premises described N. r , ' s furnished w.,.iot. .harge solely for the purpose of a. .st in locating said premises and the. no liability for inaccuracies therein. It does not purport to show ALL highways, roads and ease - affecting said premises. = %. of preces MrSt c r- r- ��TY� Lt •mac i �5 3 • 5 I k-► u3. f cu NT �i�-" 4E h! Lot (ptto r .ge a� o F RDA-0 ics G f or w All Cur( - 3S' b . v e W IS OFf 111-€ Gtr ( LE. ���n r`..�•.1 iir.lnrnn�n ... ' +1'NA:.' /'.kic...i.wt � {,,.. M.1t. "....! z..: i+.,•^ n• �t� '.::htii:�..Y+YC +..+.I.CC.�1.v Y.'ki:.s ,i•ZA tleb.`Scii:Ltiiv7il'tc'. `,'.•",01.: c�Sa iii'rr�'s `};.T`i;„�lyyj:�'4'•:Sly H.40i s.: ii Sj. t.g.ir,4%,0,:L'f }n':y':k3✓lki,' P! {.'iV .`fryl. Z • Wiz` mow: 00 • rno J= 1- N !L Q; W. • H O' . Z 1- W OS .0 H; ww F-V •— Z� • V N: H • Z City ui Tukwila Planning Division . 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting, July 27, 1979.. lc- r The Short Subdivision Committee was brought to order with the following members present: Kjell.Stoknes, Terry Monaghan and Jim Hoel representing the Fire Chief. Dick Reeves was present from Wilsey & Ham, the engineer for the project. Traffic information had been submitted to Mr. Monaghan per the require- ments of the last Subdivision Committee meeting of July 12, 1979. Mr. Monaghan suggested that we could have notations on the Short Plat, a notation that the developer may be requi ed to provide future traffic improvements if needed, or basically that the State Environmental Policy Act must be complied with with each development proposal. Mr. Monaghan indicated that he had.a preference for the last alternative: More 'discussion followed then moved by' Mr. Stoknes, seconded by Mr. Monaghan that the Short Plat be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the following wording appear on the face of the Short Plat Map: "In approving this Short Plat the City recognizes that future devel- opment will be reviewed under the State Environmental Policy Act to determine the impact of traffic generated by each project." 2. That the following requirement be complied with prior to issuance of a building permit: That the developer submit an adequate design of the cul -de -sac and the intersection with the private easement road prior to issuance of any building permits. This motion was seconded by Mr. Monaghan and approved unanimously. rrZC'EVIED plil.t ;' bit. i Pl. With no further discussion the Committee adjourned. Minutes prepare • by: 11 Stoknes, Director ce of Community Development AUG 2 1979 U it V City.,' Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting, July 12, 1979. The Short Subdivision Committee was brought to order with the following members present: Kjell Stoknes, Terry Monaghan and Jim Hoel representing the Fire Chief. A representative was present from Wilsey & Ham representing the applicant and the developer was present. Discussed during this meeting were the following: 1. That there appeared to be adequate room alongside the bridge to Fort Dent to construct the continued trail to the roadway. 2. There was inadtiaate information regarding traffic circulation and peak hour demand and how that would relate to the intersec- tion with the cul -de -sac comprised of an easement road and the roadway itself. The Committee decided.to table this item until a further traffic analysis based on full development of the adjacent property could be submitted to the Public Works Department to determine the adequacy of the roadway and /or necessary design modifications. :Meeting adjourned. Minutes rep red by: 'e11 Stoknes, Director Office of Community Development. u�s1.. ?a�t:is,,,t.... ^.e,A:tt,:t --4. k‘a. ` t. Z vrAisa4;#...1,t ;t. *.til ... 4, y..w 1ifi�7i. K,�%$�i'ei'+.,; � a4, is�auC,e t:,. 4« �" i" v:' +ti:*�;t�b�„ti;(ft+.�«t +r ttl e...1;esi494ii wi1rt':•;;1;:ittat z HZ; Lim 2: 6 J Ci' 0 O, t CO 0 V W: W =: —111—; W 0' gQ: CO = d I— _ I-o Z I-- Wuj D. U� ;o W W! H r- .:z. w .0 0 z 9 July 1979 I Y t L-1 lLI -C >1 - ; City Tukwila Administration 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development Dick Reeves Wilsey & Ham 1980 - 112th Ave. N.E. Suite #200 Bellevue, WA 98004 RE: Shot— S`ubdi vi s i on Application - Western Atfy7.eti c Club Dear Dick: After the Short Subdivision Committee reviewed the above referenced short subdivision application during their meeting of July 5, 1979, they tabled any action on it until the City received the following information: 1. Traffic information as may be required by the Public Works Department to determine whether or' not the private ease- ment road is in an appropriate location. Information sub - mitted should include the type .of user for the properties, estimated traffic volume, potential traffic conflicts, and other information as may be required by the Public Works Department. Please contact Terry Monaghan for more specifics on this item. 2. An east /west cross section through the bridge to determine if there is adequate right -of -way so the proposed trail will not dead -end against the bridge but can in fact connect to the road approaching the bridge. Also discussed was the desirability of an easement, as opposed to a dedication, of the area within 20 feet of the top of the bank for public access purposes. Please discuss with your clients if they have any problems with an easement as opposed to a dedication. Please give me a call when you feel prepared to have another Short Subdivi- sion Committee and I will make the arrangements. Very truly yours, ell Stoknes, Director Office of Community Development KS /ckh cc: Hubert Crawley Tarry Mnnanhan 441;.# r:,.: u • e��rltet�`�:ti�f:+iia't ' �:}la �:,.l . »s3.;91` ?4L3:+• v' 4n$ or+ rAYsoWih" s. ' 1906 City of Tukwila Planning Division 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 433 -1845 Office of Community Development SHORT SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting, July 5, 1979. The Short Subdivision Committee was brought to order with the following members present: Kjell Stoknes, Hubert Crawley, and Terry Monaghan. A representative was present from Wilsey & Ham, the engineer for the development. z aate: J V` O 0 co cnw, w z. J 1- N LL w 0 J LL ¢ The Western Athletic Club proposed short plat on the Firoito property on the = eastern end of Southcenter Boulevard east of Interurban Avenue was the only _. item on the agenda. z 1- 0 z 1- iu , 0 -` 0 F-'. iw 2. The proposed easement road is too close to the bridge going over the river and would appear to create some traffic conflicts. w z' ui Mr. Monaghan indicated that there was no information submitted regarding the ()El. type of user proposed for the property, traffic volume, potential traffic con- 0 ~ flicts and other related traffic information necessary to assess if the pro- posed private access road is in an acceptable location to the Public Works Department. Mr. Stoknes brought up the subject of whether or not the private easement road would be a required improvement, and therefore whether or not it would have to be built or bonded prior to recording of the short plat. Our relationship was made to the similarity with the Aiton short subdivision upon 53rd Avenue South and Southcenter Boulevard. In that case building or bonding was required prior to the recording of the short prat. With the above questions in mind, the Short Subdivision Committee tabled the proposed short plat pending submission of documents related to the following: 1. Necessary traffic information as may be required by the Public Works Department. 2. A cross section of the right -of -way and bridge to indicate whether or not the proposed trail dedication ends. Also discussed was whether or not the City should accept the dedication of the 20 foot trail area adjacent to the river or if this should be an easement. No resolution was made on this issue. Discussed was the possibility that the City may have to provide maintenance to this 20 foot area should it be dedicated. Chief Crawley noted two items: 1. The proposed trail dedication adjacent to the river appears to dead -end against the bridge. so; '13.54tr ;141,L4;' '. 'ble Lii Sotb.le t ", Short Subdivision Committee Minutes Page 2 July 5, 1979 With no further business on the agenda, the meeting was adjourned. Minutes prepared by: jell Stoknes, Director Office of Community Development .I{;.,.ZAK,,rSuN Iagli47 i4' btil& T..laiss3:3'S'1ii.�:+raa:�i'?s. MPA. n • 1 FORT DENT III RADOVICH U Z O THE FAR COMPANY 1 a,T .a oatam:+:';;i':e.milOgia4g4. aAriis7:a,`m'EntilL`'F 4■4,As 0 1- • 4-- - SECTION C • z z oE cn cn cn o (..) a )- z 1— en FORT DENT CROSS SECTIONS SECTION G , - '6.14k144,14.f.:4,21;,V,IkkatAkUU.IP tG" 1 i 1 1 1 STATISTICS: z J 0 W MMMM ;3 MIL 1..11 ,ATTACHMENT 1 z:ii:5:s CM- "{2ial�ti Ci:iddA,L4.iiiive C •.i�F�• 4, i3. 4441—i vA}'±kx4itli ". , 4 • 9Nrld ld q p; �� C B C C L Z B '9 0 Z 3 N O H d 3 1 3 1 '• dnoHo NoIS3Q ItlVU1:13j NOIONHSVM 'VIMDI11 1%, W 4 NMVW 1147\/ .L110A NO11N13 Nd51A321 7a•02•71 aim i3. 4441—i vA}'±kx4itli E P. z a. • MT:i=24 ■..\\ PORTAL SOUTH b w :!:.• ;;!! c!' .0.4,i;dv,4,c,..tiari,,kApai(iW:44;!42424ke . , rt e A ...X• WIN 7.0 V gNolivA31= 2101Nal.X3 %mit,- (.-. - , , 1 ,. ' • , .. . . •-....,, ,,,•- ,p,/ EBEC 1.Z8 VOL 3N0Hd3131...;) • dncni9 N9IS30 11111111,133 NOIDNISYM Vamorif — 1 1 1 1 a - . . . PINT 0 - 7° :40 rowno 9S•Or•D my, 3311H1 »130 .1.110A NO■1103 NOISIA321 .•.. .0.4,i;dv,4,c,..tiari,,kApai(iW:44;!42424ke . , rt e A 4 ' 0 p V 4 ill' 0 p B v, 3 it — 1 1 1 1 a - . . . PINT 0 - • - .•.. ti 6-- -- -- I ' 4 --sew— 1`G EAST SUILDINS ELEVAITON .. LIOESI _ ._ TM' ...... a . NOM lir • . . . �caaanni NM. IMAM MILLA.FINSO NORTH BUILDING ELE\ p ti V n e i '2 1----1 .._•.,....., I ■ 4,1-- ! .; • il _ ' ' L ---4-- !... _ 1111 - - 7 • P ..; 1 it 4 1 I , ___ , --- ----: _........ . 1 1 _EVAITON — _ ._. - _._,__ __:.- -: . iti 11 II41— 5 1- to _ ... I-1 , --I! 1 --,--,- „ — __ I I 1 I e r IIII , __ _ , __,7 __ . .... __... 1 . . . . ., „ fl .0.4,i;dv,4,c,..tiari,,kApai(iW:44;!42424ke . , ATTACHME p !s t• a• +� a -.•t .D-.H d } • r —1 . • �yt:t .. = r�., a. 2: i3..,i•b3f'�.�y:,'•.v6 ?.1.s4.. .�.L ��.44+;.21 }+�t�i,r �.t'.Ftuda:if'r7.'1.d C` 4 z 5 a w Q 0 z a. • — • -4 5 a cc 0 0 0 w N K T. . f. ;. a-.a. O 7: G' S: xx»: i:.::" �, 2sr� '�R�k:#4i.�rl"rn�Afpx�i`i5t.'' wit:. 2.t Ji' F[ CY.` n?. ss.` J. o�: �rv�a' �r�. 3ti.' N11• a' b' 2nki� 'J2i2':il�.t'�2�1i�'r;(.' -i i �'tt"FXt�s ?.Svtii'a• r` +;" .r, t". Z • F' Z 112, JV . oo . a Npr w w` W wo w Q. 'CO I- w, •. Z . ••0 N' w; • H V; Z; V N': ATTACHMENT G .:r consultants 0 0 K. 0 0 0 z ,. o. w. G-- — ,-�- c o- t' r✓::+ �iAS.f idS: fa2i, �di;ti'.V7.44icsi'iP,':tS"24y .+,.Vem�.;�al;fo.l'.:t rK+tC+�+'�rit"G'A:I�.•�i �%�xfDb4 t`w�: .%�`S'.�iii?s4s,'`iti ".. �C,hit�":, L• Ai' vifl� t.6,;:�`i1u�.cri:�i'4^.i6i: � 1. ATTACHMENT D LiJ w uJ 1 .! It = 7f 11111 11111 111 ' ■ 41c, f 0 WEST ELEVATION ATTACHMENT B it! ,JI1 e. i • Y -Amy 1) �tl o E yam. t • CC I. 1 11 I ,i/ :%•/} F 24•. �}.•-. Ia.. 41ii^ i< i^ �! wkiJtJ6ly+ ti1i20i }e.'x?SciJf}Ei.�uL':lub�'i -V.; ..w:k3sy'se i%a5ys st ki " `v,ge! t•+•riaiwiti .o'Ri.`' ', 'aw"i� k;- ;w;2is G tiaV .1 ?,,�'- .r'�i'ti % +t�4; . t.t�a:. � a.. kufiHStiii : +5tt'.�:s:i�`•S.ii9' -;-- : �. 5s +:tSiit.itC;;+i�."t,^`�$t%��F efak izati t.jIA,y/=te:a4 41.ri 'lbW&, 4- 4;':?•Sr+fi)7i)41,..,, Z =1-' W 6 JU: U O'. • ,. t1) p .00 N LL' • W O. = .I- W Z1- • Zh- W W` D;• W W: ILA' •— O; =i • O F—;. • Z 8 5 / 0 8 77 1 '1 0 0 8 CO 0 0 8 !?: 8 s, 0 0 8 8 1.41 ; s, 8 a {" PLANT LIST jnnCn�n�•'4' lid (tempt 1 Jyy-r yi flr DADD z mow. .J U . 0 0.. U: W I W 0; g Q, — _° 1 Z O,, 0 L. UJ I- -. LL — O: wN = z '"110' '144140414 mass.°e t' 1d 311$ E9EE 'I.Z9 '9OZ '3NOHd3131 '.' .t' dnom9 N'JIS3Q iarad3i C w.. m,.o,... �.. NOLOWSVM'V1MD1111 °'""""""""""" 31 :ee O3M33N7 'R ;,L8N9rW 33Z1-11. 11430 10i NOW/ NOISN3tl 9FOL•11 71NL '"110' '144140414 ;LA Ye..7'KnI1 ,—••■••••-wriirmisom,r ' ffI I. I II ' I I z 0 00 U) a • LLJ 111 1 W LL uj 0 Ce LL- < I Z 0 Z F- LU Lij 0 O w O — O F- L11 uj wz 0 P — 0 w 0 O 1- z c4 0 5 5 aNI1 001 g 0 co • 371 t 1 Co 4 1— d a 5 8 11 NO.'. 'ill io 0 0 d) 26'24'11" W 77..5 44 10% 1— tI ' 1 wt) EXIST. CURS 9 STALLS fo S'— mu= \i2' —m" 3N11 100Z C.) 0 Id 0 r— 0 ASPWALT RIVER TRAIL CONNECTION —I 112) to No. cD a Ti n A I u n A I n 0 1- z In 0 F- LU 0-) -w > ma- Lu 0 111 CL .) 1.1.1 0 EC z < • • z w O 0 co In w w uj 0 LL- g -73 < (/) I- al Z 1.- i-0 Z LLI w ILI al o co uj I LI 0 u) 0