Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L94-0004 - JORDAN CALVIN - TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AB Tukw; Existing Transport Figure 11: 2002 Noon Peak Hour Traffic Volumes North 0 Not to scare L M i A Y■ d C r A Legend: Study Area . Trail, Walkway — •• —••• Railroad River Freeway Ramp •':' 4 '? Park r, Intersection .—► Approach Volumes (Vehicles per Hour) Source: Tukwila Public Works Department Tukwila Llrba Existing Transportation Cc Drab CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATEriEiERMINATION OF NONSIGNIF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: .ANCE (MDNS) Develop a golf driving range containing a 2 story building with 60 golfing stations and supported by 104 parking spaces. The development area is 22.62 acres. Impervious surface area will be 1.39 acres with the remainder being a grassed driving field. A safery net 50 to 75 feet high will run along Southcenter Parkway, behind a double row of poplar trees. PROPONENT: CHRIS BENNETT LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY ADDRESS: PARCEL NO: SEC/TWN/RNG: J100 (18791 SOUTHCENTER PY) 352304.-9015 SW 35-23-04, west of SOUTHCENTER PY, ithith'of'S180th St. LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF TUKWILA FILE NO L94-0004t The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The conditions to this SEPA,, Determination are attached. This prop • • is issmgitunder 197-11-340(2). Comments ,must be submitted by t_09,2i171`t The lead agency Will, not act on this for 15 days from the date below. L. Beeler, Resp Cit of Tukwila, (206) 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Official Date 1-3680 • You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above signature date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Department of Community Development. L94 -0004: Tukwila Golf Driving Range Mitigating Conditions April 12, 1994 B.7. Environmental Health (Pg. 8) The Director of the Department of Community Development shall, in consultation with the Tukwila Golf Course Manager and other departmental representatives, ensure that the hazard of balls flying onto adjacent roadways and property has been mitigated to an acceptable level. B.11 Light and Glare (Pg. 11) The desire for bright grounds lighting to track the golf ball's flight, landing, and distance signs shall be accommodated as long as there is no direct off -site illumination and /or indirect glare such as produced by a "stadium halo." B.14 Transportation i. A traffic mitigation payment of $24,684.00 for intersection impacts shall be provided as discussed in the traffic study, prior to final construction approval. ii. Frontal improvements as required by Public Works Department road improvements ordinances and /or the Planning Commission (Conditional Use Permit L94- 0005), shall be designed based on the 57th Avenue South (Southcenter Parkway) Design Report. As an alternative to immediate construction, the applicant may enter into a developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for the improvements, which would be built later in a coordinated manner with the overall road improvement. An exception would be permanent or temporary improvements which are determined by the Public Works Department or the Planning Commission (through the Conditional Use Permit process) to be needed immediately. iii. An additional 10 foot right -of -way dedication or an easement for sidewalks, curbs, and utilities shall be provided prior to approval of the construction. This area is required in order to place the required frontal improvements as designed in the "57th Avenue South 'Preliminary' Design /Location Report ". (. L94 -0004: Tukwila Golf Driving Range April 12, 1994 B.16 Utilities A1,1:111., e' 3,7.11,, to Pg. 2 i. Adequate long term sewer service shall be provided to the site. This may be provided with a temporary sewer line, to satisfy the immediate needs of the proposed development, in conjunction with a developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for permanent sewer service; or the immediate placement of a long- term sewer line. Either option shall be provided prior to final building construction approval. ii. A developer's agreement to provide a fair -share payment for commercial water service, up- grading the existing substandard domestic line, shall be provided prior to final construction approval. file 94 \tukgolf \sepa A F F °D A V I T I, Sylvia A. Osby El Notice of Public Hearing O Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Packet Board of Appeals Agenda Packet • []Planning Commission Agenda Packet El Short Subdivision Agenda Packet O F D I S T R I B U T I O N hereby declare that: O Notice of Application 'for Shoreline Management Permit ElShoreline Management Permit DDetermination of Non- significance XaMitigated Determination of Nonsignificance DDetermination of Significance and Scoping Notice. . Notice of Action n Official Notice Other -1 Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on April 14, FAXED TO SEATTLE TIMES (4 -13 -94 & Publishing date 4- 15 -94) MAILED TO DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY MAILED TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S MAILED TO APPLICANTS -(Cal Jordan OFFICE VIA ECOLOGY & Chris Bennett) SENT TO MAYOR, CITY CLERK MAILED TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS Name of Project TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE Signature File Number L94 -0004 1994 . . BATCH .NUMBER: CUSTOMER NAME RR TIBOR NAGY 352304..9051•07 SEGALE!MARIO.A PO BOX88050 TUKWILA.WA 352300.9068•08 SEGALE M A INC: ' PO.BOX88050. TUKWILA:WA 1 352304'.9116•00 SEGALE MARIO..A • PO.BOX.88050. TUKWILA WA (. . . . R0575 98188 R0576 98188 5N9800 "1, :'--• -. ---..--.:.,.:-\--,f,;'..2'1: COMMENTS • , 352309•9017".00 10 GACO WESTERN INC P0.80L88698 • SEATTLE WA 98188 TUKWILA STATION 352300.904100 SEGALE MARIO. A 18010 SOUTHCENTER PKWY TUKWILA WA 352304•9050.08 SEGALE MARIO_A 18010 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY TUKWILA,WA- 352300.9056•02 SCHOENBACHLER HERMAN 18115'SOUTHCENTER PKWY. SEATTLE WA 969999 98188 R0777 98188 R0877 98188 352304.'9081.'01 GACO WESTERNANC PO BOX 88698 TUKWILA STATION SEATTLE WA 98188 352304,9115.'01 SEGALE.MARIOA PO.BOX88050, TUKWILA.WA 352304•9118■08 SEGALE.MARIO A PO 80X88050.. 98188 TUKWILA WA 5N9800 98188 . 819800' 98188 _ - t 4 it. 768160..0125..08 : 768160.'0130.'01 SCHNEIDER HOMES INC C1280 l' SCHNEIDER HOMES INC, C1280 , 6510 SOUTHCENTER..BLVD SUITE.1. 6510 SOUTHCENTER.BLVD SUITE 1 . . . 'TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA.WA . 98188 768160-0195-03. :; 768160..0200.'06 SCHNEIDER HOMES.INC CI280 SCHNEIDER'HOMES INC C1280; 6510 SOUTHCENTER BLVD SUITE-1. 6510. SOUTHCENTER .BLVD:SUITE1,. TUKWILA WA 98188 TUKWILA'WA 98188 I . 7681601'0205.'01' . SCHNEIDER HOMES.INC C1280 , . 6510 SOUTHCENTERBLVD'SUITE,I• g 'TUKWILA WA. 98188 71. 768160•0210•04.: • SCHNEIDER.HOMES.INC: " C1280 6510 SOUTHCENTER.A3LVD:SUITE 1. TUKWILA WA. 98188 Telephone Memo To: File From: Vernon Umetsu Date: July 6, 1994 RE: Response to Mr. J. Hazard Letter on Traffic Impacts of Home Depot and Tukwila Golf Driving Range. Discussed the traffic impact mitigating measures with Mr. Hazard as follows: Home Depot Based on a traffic study conducted for this project, a. $257,148 in impact mitigation fees were collected to improve 4 affected intersections and b. various frontal improvements and road easements were immediately provided. Tukwila Golf Driving Range Based on a traffic study conducted for this project, a. $24,684 in impact mitigation fees were collected for intersection improvements b. the developer agreed to pay for all his frontal improvements (curb, storm drainage, utilities, and sidewalks) upon the 57th Avenue road widening, and c. immeidately convey a 10 ft. wide easement for frontal. improvements. I referred him to Brian Shelton for more information on the schedule for 180th St. improvements. GACO WESTERN, INC. POLYURETHANE FOAM AND ELASTOMERIC COATINGS June 10, 1994 Rick Beeler Director of Community Development Planning Department City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Mr. Beeler: Gaco Western is located directly across Southcenter Parkway from the proposed golf driving range. I am writing to voice my concern regarding VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. My question is: Have any studies been made regarding the increase in traffic load this driving range will put on Southcenter Parkway? I raise the issue again, because of the traffic "snarl" that resulted due to Home Depot USA, Inc. locating in Tukwila (please see my 1/22/93. letter, which was never answered, i.e. "what studies have been done regarding the impact the Depot will have on traffic and the plan they or the City has to minimize the traffic problems. ") I assume that since I received no answer to my Home Depot question, no study was done; because if one had been done, the problems currently encountered would have been foreseen. I'm concerned because I use 180th. every day and it's an .asphalt jungle. Why didn't the City or Home Depot construct an overpass at 180th. and the Valley Road before the Depot people occupied the building? I don't want the street in front of Gaco to become another "180th and the Valley Freeway" mess. JPH /yds cc: J. Haggerton 15820 43rd. Ave. S. Tukwila, WA 98188 Sincerely, GACO WESTERN, INC. 1'4 James P. Hazar President P.O. Box 88698 / Seattle, WA 98138 -2698 / 206 - 575 -0450 P.O. Box 646 / Waukesha, WI 53187 -0646 / 414- 542 -8072 January 22, 1993 City of Tukwila Planning Division 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, WA 98188 Gentlemen; 1 am writing in regard to case number L92-0088, Home inc. Xrhave worked in Tukwila. since 1974 and have Been increase due priparilyto.expension.of retail space. city is .aware of the.massive.traffic congestion at the Of 180th..•andifeet.Valley.Highway. Common sense would dictate theta responsible firm like.Hote Depot would address the traffic congestion as part of their plan. ••, . . Unfortunately, • 1 will be unable to attend the January 28, '1993 hearingvhowever, 1 would:be interested to, knOw,What studies have been done regarding the impact the Depot will have'lOn'traffiqand the plan they or the city has to minimize 'the.trafficliroblems.:, :Sincerely, GAM MISTERNI INC. • • '."- Depot, USA, the traffic Ism sure the intersection JPH/yds James P. Hazard President Control No. P "r; -026 Epic File No. t; 0001L Fee $ 325 Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Tukwila Driving Range 2. Name of Applicant: Chris Bennett 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contract person: Cal Jordan 643 -3123 4. Date checklist prepared: Janaury 17, 1994 5. Agency requesting checklist: CITY OF TUKWILA 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including Phasing, if applicable): Construction is planned for June, 1994 with completion in Fall, 1994. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future development on the site envisions a mini -golf course (putt - putt range). Application for this use is planned after the City completes its rezoning of the area. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Environmental Checklist has been prepared for a "Preliminary' Design /Location Report to improve 57th Avenue South from So. 180th Street to So. 200th Street (Entranco Engineers, January 20, 1989). City of Tukwila "Stream & Wetland Inventory" RECEIVED JAN 2 0 1994 COIVIMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Environmental Checklist - 1 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range C 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. The City has completed a "Preliminary' Design /Location Report to improve 57th Ave. So. from So. 180th Street to So. 200th Street. No construction schedule has been determined. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. • Conditional Use Permit • Building Permit • Occupancy Permit 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Construction of a golf driving range on a 12.62 acre site containing 50 covered and 10 uncovered hitting stations. Supporting the facility is food service, pro -shop, meeting and teaching rooms, rest rooms, offices, and storage. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including street address, if any, and section, township range, if known. if a proposal would occur over a range area, provide the range boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located on the west side of 57th Avenue So., approximately 2,500 feet south of the intersection of So. 180th Street and 57th Ave. So. See attached legal description and vicinity map. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Yes. The site has a Type 1 & 2 watercourse and the western portion of the site has Class 2 & 3 slopes. Project will not encroach into these areas. or their buffers. Environmental Checklist - 2 - Tukwila Golf Drivina Ranae TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, Rolling, Hilly, Steep slopes, Mountainous, Other. Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. What is the steepest slope on the site? The development area will be away from the 40 %+ valley walls, on the flat floor. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Silt and peat soils are susceptible to significant settlement under loading. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading purposed. Indicate source of fill. The building pad and part of the parking lot will be filled approximately 27,000 CY of free draining material. This will raise the building and parking 3 feet higher to closer align them with the proposed finished grade of 57th Ave. So. Fill will be imported from an approved borrow site. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use. If so, generally describe. No About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 6.4% rz. Environmental Checklist - 3 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: Approved temporary erosion control measures will be used during construction. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e. dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. Construction activities will produce dust and exhaust emissions. After construction, the vehicle exhaust emissions will increase. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or order that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any. The contractor will be required to provide dust control during construction. 3. Water a. Surface 1) Is their any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Evaluation for Agency Use Only A Class 1 & 2 waterway flows through the site. The water flows north, traverses under 57th Ave. So. south of So. 180th Street and connects into the City storm water system. The Green River is located 600 feet away, across Southcenter Parkway (57th Ave. S.) and intervening properties. Environmental Checklist - 4 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range ':!"..,.. . a. ^...,.�:;T,e.,n.,."'?::Y."..+.7 �1'�...i!7 ;�".'.�`;;:.. ii= �i.P ?• "..., +:T,:i;h`�f'�:•1.h TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach plans. The improvements will be adjacent to the Class 2 watercourse. The applicant is requesting a reclassification of the watercourse to a Class 3. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities, if know. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note the location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b Ground 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose and approximate quantities, if known. No Evaluation for Agency Use Only Environmental Checklist - 5 Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Describe waster materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (For example: domestic sewage, industrial, containing the following chemicals..., agricultural, etc.). describe the general size of the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None c. Water runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities) \, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Surface water run -off from buildings and the parking area. Water is diverted into a bio- filtration swale that flows into the retention structure. The outflow from the retention structure is through a controlled release structure. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and run -off water impacts, if any. The run -off that empties into the Type 2 water course is controlled with a release control structure. Both rate of flow and oil /silt devices are planned. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site. X Deciduous tree: alder, ample aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, pine, cedar, other Shrubs X Pasture _ Crop or grain _ Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullush, skunk cabbage, other _ Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other _ Other types of vegetation Environmental Checklist - 6 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range r .,,...., ,.. �... .'t:'.. ':i7 +;_.n�.. w:: Xi'• +_'� v.... .... t...... isi ,;ifi,:x�..�'.!:?= r.�,'.'si�:'; "'.t:: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The pasture grass will be removed for the building pad and parking area. No trees are envisioned to be removed. c) List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d) Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any. Planting of a landscape buffer along 57th Ave So. will provide cover for small birds. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. Mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other. Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other. b) List any other threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c) Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The area is in the vicinity of the Pacific Flyway. d) Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. None Evaluation for Agency Use Only Environmental Checklist 7 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 6. Energy and Natural Resources a) What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Natural gas heating and electric heat pumps for cooling. b) Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy and adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c) What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any. The project will meet the State's energy Code for heating and lighting. 7. Environmental Health Evaluation for Agency Use Only a) Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal If so, describe. Golf balls may fly out of property onto adjacent roads and developments. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. N/A 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any. Netting and other containment elements shall be provided and approved to mitigate this hazard (e.g. containment wall at the driving tee station). b) Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None Environmental Checklist 8 Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associates with the project on a short-term basis (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Noise associated with construction activity will cause an increase in noise levels as high as 90 dBA. The City Code allows construction noise between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None 8. Land and Shoreline Use a) What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The western portion of the site is forested. The eastern portion is used for grazing. b) Has the site been used for agriculture If so, describe. The eastern portion of the site is used for grazing of llamas'. c) Describe any structures on the site. None d) Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No e) What is the current zoning classification of the site? R -A (Agriculture) `;n Evaluation for Agency Use Only f) What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? Light Industrial Environmental Checklist Tukwila Golf Driving Range :vt TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only g) If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not in the shoreline area. h) Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Yes. Most of the area is designated for special development consideration because of steep slopes, water courses and agricultural use. Specifically, the western portion of the site in steep slopes. i) Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 15 j) Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k) Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A I) Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project is conditionally permissable with the current zoning. The Comprehensive Plan allows, outright, the proposed use. 9. Housing a) Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, or low income housing. None Environmental Checklist -10 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only b) Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, or low income housing. None c) Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any. N/A 10. Aesthetics a) What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building materials(s) proposed? • 35 feet maximum building height • Concrete block and wood siding • A 50 -75' high net will run along the road -side property boundary. b) What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? fie Hillside views from Southcenter Parkway will be obscurred by plantings (atached) and the net. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any. The area along 57th Ave So. will be planted with a landscape buffer. 11. Light and Glare a) What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The driving range will be lighted from dusk until 12:00 AM. The desire tosee ball flight shall' be accommodated if it can be done with no off -site glare, including direct illumination or indirect "stadium halo ". b) Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c) What existing off-site sources of light or glare may effect your proposal? None Environmental Checklist - 11 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT d) Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any. 12. Recreation Evaluation for Agency Use Only The lighting will have a cut -off lens to reduce light spill. Internally lit distance signs could be used. a) What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Green River Trail b) Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any. The project will construct a golf driving range but future plans envision adding a putt-putt golf course. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a) Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b) Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. X'The Ness Cemetary, owned by the Tukwila Historical , Society) lies 200 yards to the southwest. c) Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. N/A Environmental Checklist - 12 - Tukwila. Golf Driving Range • TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only 14. Transportation a) Identify public street and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The project eastern edge of the project borders 57th Ave. So. Access will be onto 57th Ave. So. b) Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? No. c) How many parking places would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 100 parking spaces are planned. No spaces will be eliminated. d) wll the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). See attached page 13 b. e) Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No f) How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. This project is estimated to generate 765 vehicular trips per day. The peak volumes will occur in the afternoon. See the attached Traffic Impact Analysis for this site prepared by David Hamlin & Associates. g) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, Haw Traffic mitigation payments per the study (attached), XFrontal improvements per the 57th Avenue Design Report, the Tukwila Sidewalk Ordinance, and as required in the Conditional Use Permit (L94- 0005). Environmental Checklist - 13 -a Tukwila Golf Driving Range 14 d). Frontal improvements (e.g., sidewalks, curb, gutter, etc.) will be required per Tukwila Ordinance 1516, and as specified in the conditional use permit. The frontal road is to be improved per the "57th Avenue 'Prelilminary' Design /Location Report." Frogital improvement design shall conform to the report designs. The report also demonstrates that the existing 60 feet' public right -of -way will be fully used as travelway and that frontal improvements will have to be located on the adjacent 10 feet wide strip (see attached). This. 10 foot wide easement will mirror the area to be required acrossI:;the road. TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT 15. Public Services Evaluation for Agency Use Only a) Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: schools, fire protection, police protection, health care, other)? If so, generally describe. Some increase in police and fire protection demand pik is anticipated. b) Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. N/A 16. Utilities a) Circle the utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b) Describe utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Type Electric Natural Gas Water Telephone Sewer Refuse C. Signature The above answers are true and • relying on them to • • - ke its di, ,, I Signature: I Al ,1,P Date: <� C/ar/y /1/ (f 9`1 1 Utility Puget Power WNG KCWD #57 US West City of Tukwila Waste Management Service Building service Building service Domestic (to be upgraded) Business Commercial (to be installed) Building service mplete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is n. Environmental Checklist - 14 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (Do Not Use this Sheet for Project Actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Does not apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Does not apply. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Does not apply. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life: Does not apply. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Does not apply. Proposed measures to project or conserve energy and natural resources are: Does not apply. Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Environmental Checklist 15 - Tukwila Golf.Drivinp Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Does not apply. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Does not apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: Does not apply. How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan? Does not apply. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Does not apply. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: Does not apply. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Does not apply. 8. Does the proposal conflict with polices of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? Of so, what policies of the Plan? Does not apply. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: Does not apply. Environmental Checklist - 16 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT Evaluation for Agency Use Only E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objects for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? The objective is to construct a 60 hitting station golf driving range along with supportive facilities. 2. What are the alternatives means of accomplishing these objectives? The site geometry and the space requirements of the project require the hitting stations and supportive facilities either be at the north or south end of the site and the driving range paralleling 57th Ave. So. This leaves two alternatives. a) Developing the facility at the south end of the site with the stations facing north. b) Developing the facility at the north end of the site with the stations facing south. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action. Alternative A is the preferred alternative. It conforms better to the site geometry. It also eliminates the problem of the hitting stations facing south into the sun, and balls going off —site. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use policy Plan? If so, what policies of the Plan. No. The Comprehensive Plan indicates Light Industrial use for the site. The envisioned use is allowed. 5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: N/A Environmental Checklist - 17 - Tukwila Golf Driving Range 'bS '* 4. RECEIVED G FEB 1 71994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT // p 1 •! 4 4 OVERALL SITE PLAN ut LOT •u.L Ww �.w LUX Y4 Mat aGAUT 0.0000* 0 co.ro..n ..ctlmt? 0 100 0 •l<•111<ltu CALVIN ASSOCIATES, INC JORDAN . rwtl n nuu. .. . .tun..... NMI • t.. Mr wr 01. 0.1W 1111 ut% q y N ' ..... To. ÷<.. <.nw• /00I -- 4 A ,:o• UPO R `I • .CCC Cif IC<ICIC< 0110111 • 1 i noun A .., n Z RECEIVE( FEB 1 7 1994 coMMUrvi ► Y EVELOPMENT 1 a PARTIAL SITE PLAN TAMA iu 'S WIGS TAX LOT 111 .. it.Land r.rn+a.a&aka4a.err UIdT*Aldl4t 0.1400111 mr . MUM.a NMI &&&&& 11,4000110 • 0 •... NAM MM 0 .M 0051 60 00 • CALVIN INC. JORDAN woo rµ. f ... . a.m. tjao Mnua pp** as 6 u pn u Z 9 4 4 • Y • • t. ' q CI 4 9 . 0 FFFFFFF$FF F F n nF ISOSSICESSMIEBE 444444.34.:4 4% 5 4 5 p O 0 p 0 0 p O 0 1 p 4 0 p O O p • rrrrrrrrrr rrrrr cccccc�ccIlg iif 1 1 1 1 1 1 1SIl 1NYld RECEIVED FEB 1 71994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .1CHIT.C1.11 V.dY:L^✓ L!1`1 J "`r' J 1 A :+7 711 zr' 1 GAIlT D MOOII 0 COIIOOATI AICMIIICT 0 0 1A..1C.TI .ICHITICI.II DT" n "VU"1.' &&&&&& MT" 4e1 1.141 NO 0 111. PHI 1411111 \ 1 • OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN =MA DEMO BANGS TAI LOT T O• Lori w ID .or rll EPA .4a; 3101 .LA 47a 1101 "DI • C. 111. ..... "•.•`. • I•Y fwn.tf 1111 ,.."6" et .rK RECEIVED FEB 1 7 1994 COMMUNITY EVELOPMENT ti • ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN MUGU DIMING LUIGI TAX LOT •Lt • 1.4. . 44. 4 sat a., Sma 1I inGAM D. mom 0 000100ATIMICNITICT •sc0 ----- u” 0 uot•0 ----- itie 0 AM. ----- MI CALVIN JORDAN ASSOCIATES,INC. MAW* ' 0■•001 •All MI 440 0 101. 010 $ 11 , SSTs 0* 11 04 •■••• to 4011.. M.N. /IN at !AM I L� 116 @s I; a in • p• 4 •I 14441 ..1•4 '424 •14 • • I"! ■ UPI t • Non , &EN •14111 441 ;AMIN :'4111 lies- 110 .1± 1 57TH AVENUE SOUTH "PRELIMINARY" DESIGN /LOCATION REPORT. TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Prepared for City of Tukwila Prepared by ENTRANCO ENGINEERS, INC. 5808 Lake Washington Boulevard N.E. Kirkland, Washington 98033 (206), 827 -1300 1■3W3SV3 3dt>M6 •1N31013SV3 AlilLLfl 0 O 0 AVM d0 1HDI11 w m93 1 w z iv 5 CC io 0 1 w 5 cc 0 w ▪ 5 . .- CC 0 iv 5 0.35' ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT 0.35' ASPHALT TREATED BASE 0.70' GRAVEL BORROW OR CRUSHED SURFACING N AVM AO lHDIa 11= OD •1N3W3SV3 Alllllfl 1N3W3SV3 3dO1S z • • 1 TYPICAL ROADWAY SECTION iGim ,I. an. IL"- A_ I•. w - N . 11111 t_- lir WV Imp To: Vernon Umetsu, Planning Division From: John A. Pierog, PW Development Engineer Dat -: March 31, 1994 Subject: Tukwila Driving Range 57th Avenue South & South Glacier Street Project No. PRE93 -026 SEPA Review Activity No. L94 -0004 Review Comments The above project activity was reviewed at the March 15th Public Works plan review meeting. The following are our specific comments: 1. SEPA Comments A. Proposed traffic mitigations totaling $24,684.00 have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. B. There are no public sewer systems in the area. Connections to /extensions of existing systems some distance away shall be required. This applicant may wish to contact King County personnel working on the Bow Lake Transfer Station Project to explore the possibility of a joint effort to extend the public sewer system into this area. 2. Miscellaneous Comments A. In accordance with a design report prepared for the City for the upgrade of 57th Avenue South, a total right -of- way width of 80' is required through this area. Therefore, an additional 10' dedication will be required from this property owner as a condition of development. B. Frontal improvements are required in accordance with Ordinance No. 1516. If these improvements are not constructed as part of this project, a developer's agreement for fair share cost participation in a future project will need to be executed. C. A Water System No- Protest Agreement will need to be executed for future upgrade of the existing 8" water main through this area. D. A double- baffled grease interceptor will be required in .....n.+»- n.w....nn.cix+ta•.s u�nu�..m£cse�C AS tar.:�va•�rrne�nwvrtr1rtm07.: conjunction with food preparation facilities. . Additional storm drainage design details will need to be provided; i.e., catch basin locations, piping, oil /water separation, etc. . All plan elevations need to be referenced to the NGV Datum. If you h -ve any questions concerning the above, please let me know. JAP /jap cf: Dev lopment File 4/11/94 To: Brian Shelton Frm: Vernon Umetsu RE: Tukwila Golf Course Impact Mitigation APR 1 1 1994 TUKWiLA PUBLIC WORKS Per John P's recommendation, I am requesting additional impact analysis to support the dedication of 10 ft. right of way area along Southcenter Parkway. The applicant has agreed to set his project back to accommodate the roadway, but will not (and as a lessee cannot) dedicated the additional area. SEPA requires a rational /physical link between impact and mitigation. The courts have not generally accepted a conflict with public policies or plans as meeting this test. In the case of the 10 foot dedication, we need to show how the project impacts will lower the LOS on the road segment to a level lower than "acceptable" limits (i.e. LOS D or whatever). This analysis would have to exclude intersection bottle -necks since the applicants are doing fair -share contributions. A clear justification is needed because of the level of project traffic and because the existing road already satisfies the minimum 60 right of way width specified in Tukwila's arterial ordinance. Demonstration of impacts can be based on the impacts solely of the facility, or as part of a cumulative whole. Note that if the cumulative approach is used, then you must show that this project is bearing its fair - share, and not paying the share of other impact contributing projects. As an alternative to SEPA, discussions with Cal Jordan indicate that the property owner could likely be agreeable to trading the 10 ft. dedication for an agreement for the City to build the travel way in front of his property. The applicant would continue to be responsible for improvements from face of curb back to the property. I need to issue the SEPA today, with a 15 day comment period. I strongly urge you to either provide us with the supporting materials for the 10 ft. dedication or begin negotiations with the property owner while discretionary Planning permits are being reviewed. Planning reviews will be completed at a public hearing 16 days from today. cc: Pace /Pierog f, r E9‘9"-(`:`-/4 54,1 ..•..,.. i", L+'. iri: r( ?i' C,.. s' ir?_ ...............r'•6�•.....•.._- 2T: .,.. City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 John W. Rants, Mayor MEMORANDUM TO: Vernon Umetsu, Associate Planner FROM: Don Williams, Parks and Recreation Director DATE: March 22, 1994 SUBJECT: Tukwila Driving Range - Environmental Review Comments Marty O'Brien, Parks and Recreation's Golf Manager, and I have reviewed the Environmental Checklist and have several comments. Marty has prepared a separate memo primarily concerning the containment fence. By element, I have these comments: 7.a. "...control environmental health hazards." I do not see another section that deals with golf balls flying over the fence, perhaps onto the public street. Such possible occurrence is a safety (health) hazard. More design work is needed concerning the height of the fence and perhaps the angle of the balls being hit. 8.h. What is specifically being done to protect the stream channel on the west side from damage from construction and later during maintenance of the grounds? 11.a. Glare from the lighting can spread to nearby areas. Additional information about the lighting to be used should be provided in this report. The limited information does no help to understand its impacts. 11.b.The response says the facility will not interfere with view. Views looking towards the hills will be blocked, views looking towards the valley will have less of an impact. 13.b.Next to the site to the southwest within 200 yards is the old Ness Cemetery, which is owned by the Tukwila Historical Society. Please call if you need additional information from Marty or me, DW /dg RECEIVED LIAR 2 41994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Phone: (206) 433 -1800 • City Hall Fax (206) 433 -1833 MEMO Foster Golf Links City Of Tukwila Parks & Recreation Department DATE: 3 -18 -94 TO: Vern Umetsu, Don Willaims FROM: Marty O'Brien SUBJECT: Tukwila Driving Range, Environmental Review 1. The fencing in this design will not contain the golf balls. When the hitting area (tee) is at a 90 degree angle to the fencing, containing the golf balls is a major problem. Even 100 foot high fences will not guarantee containment. I have first hand experience, having worked at two driving ranges both designed with the same fence angle to the hitting area. Many times there is enough property adjacent to the range and the balls can be retrieved. This range presents a major problem because of the street that parallels the fence and hitting area. Note, that the 100 foot fence I am talking about is for a single story range with the hitting area at ground level. Several ranges in our ares have had this problems, Jefferson Park, Kent, and Lynwood. They contain the balls by installing barrier nets in between each hitting stall. These nets are 8 to 10 feet tall and need to extend a minimum of 20 out from the tee area in order to be effective. I have never seen a two story range with adequate barrier fencing. Most of the time the second story hitting area are exposed, and therefor do not have any method to support the fencing. This project has been designed to maximize the limited amount of property. there has been no consideration for containing the golf balls. The fencing in this design would not be effective for a single story range let alone a two stories range. Designs that are efficient in containing the balls, have the hitting ares arranged in a half circle so the tees can be all pointed to central target in the center of the •range. Other efficient designs have a 30 to 50 yard buffer between the last hitting area and the fence. There is an example of a two story short distance range in Lynwood. It was designed with 100 foot high fence that was fully inclosed. Unfortunately after the first snow storm the fence collapsed. They have not rebuilt because of the cost. A visit to any of the area ranges while golfers are hitting balls would help understand the problems driving ranges pose. 2. The range also needs a security fence or the first ten feet of the fence, fenced with a steel fabric. Nylon fence is used for ranges. They are easily damaged or torn. To prevent theft or in this case safety for 4 ( \ 1/4•* ' • 't pedestrian and vehicle traffic a security fence is needed for the street side of the property. - , ! i • (1, 3. I would recommend that some kind of insurance guarantee be required in or order to operate. It will be difficult to find insurance coverage and maintain it. After there are several claims the insurance companies will drop the coverage. 4. Common problems with high fencing is damage from wind and weather. They are very expensive to repair and many times are left damaged for long periods. Again because of the location of the range to the street, I feel it would be important to have some kind of restrictions to operated: If the fence was damaged and would present a safety problem the range would have to be closed until the fence was repaired. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON January 1.994 Prepared for: Calvin Jordan Associates DAVID I. HAMLIN AND ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVENUE NORTH - SUITE 270: SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 285 -9035 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE TUKWILA, WASHINGTON I. INTRODUCTION A) General The information which follows is intended to address the anticipated transportation impacts resulting from the development of the Tukwila Driving Range. The site is located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway (Frager Road), south of S. 180th Street in the City of Tukwila. The purpose of this report is to review and analyze current conditions in the vicinity of the site, review the proposed development and the impacts to the transportation system, and develop the appropriate mitigation as necessary. B) Project Description The proposed project is for the development of a golf driving range with a practice putting and chipping green plus additional support facilities such as a pro shop, snack bar, and video rooms. The driving range will consist of 60 tees on two levels with a 290 yard netted driving range. The subject property is located on the west side of Southcenter Parkway several hundred feet south of S. 180th Street. The vicinity map shown on Figure 1 outlines the subject area. The adjacent land use is single - family residential and undeveloped parcels of land. Extensive retail development is located to the north/ northeast of the site and 1 -5 to the west of the site. Arterial streets in the area include Southcenter Parkway, S. 180th Street, and West Valley Highway. Access to the site will be from Southcenter Parkway. The building structure will be located near the southerly portion of the site with customer parking and the practice greens on the south side of the building. The subject property is an undeveloped site consisting of a flat, grassy pasture area on the easterly portion of the property, with a steep upgrade on the westerly portion of the property vegetated mainly with deciduous trees. The remainder of this report will analyze the effects of the development of the subject property and the traffic - related impacts which can be expected on the adjacent intersections. A reduced copy of the site plan is shown in the Appendix. 1 • 1 S 152ND ST 61!111 ST S 152nD S`,T \I .H FVANS CAA DP 4007 Kw STRAND R B V S It/111 a1 aCORPORATE DR N CORPORATE DR UPLAND DR 2. S 100TH ST MINKI S I ST ST SPRINGBROOK GREENBELT 160TH ST S 180TH ST S 190TH S 190TH ST IL,...) n S 192ND S S 194TH ST S196TH ST 196TH ST PROJECT S ITE S 202N0 S 204TH ST S 208774 S 207TH) PI S 209TH ST S 2tOTH ST 212TH ST •12TH ST 1 RI EN PROJECT VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A) Adjacent Transportation System Southcenter Parkway adjacent to the site is a two lane roadway with open ditches, little or no shoulders and a posted speed of 35 mph. The adjacent land use includes the project site, which is undeveloped, a single- family acreage, a major equipment storage area for a construction company, and a storage /moving company facility. North of S. 180th Street, Southcenter Parkway is striped for two southbound lanes, a center two -way left -turn lane and three northbound lanes along a portion of the street. North of Strander Boulevard, Southcenter Parkway is a multi -lane arterial bordering the north and west sides of Southcenter Mall. The street is striped for four lanes and includes turn storage lanes along the mall frontage. Raised curb has also been installed in this area. Traffic signals control many of the mall entrances and the ramps to 1 -5. Andover Park West is a four lane north -south arterial with curb, gutter, and street lights, and sidewalk along most sections of the roadway. Left -turn storage lanes have been installed on Andover Park West at Tukwila Parkway and Baker Boulevard. Andover Park West is fronted by a mix of retail, office and warehouse /light industrial uses. The posted speed L is 35 mph. South of S. 180th Street, Andover Park West turns into Segale Drive "A ", which is private. Strander Boulevard is a multi -lane east -west arterial connecting Southcenter Parkway with West Valley Highway. Strander Boulevard includes a two -way left -turn lane between L Southcenter Parkway and Andover Park West. East of. Andover Park West the street is striped for four lanes, although left -turn storage lanes have been provided at Andover Park West, Andover Park East, and West Valley highway. Curb, gutter, and street lights have been installed along the entire length of the street, but sidewalk exists only between Southcenter Parkway and Andover Park West. The street is fronted by a variety of commercial developments and has a posted speed of 35 mph. S. 180th Street consists of two through lanes in each direction plus a two -way left -turn lane or a left -turn storage pocket. Curb, gutter, and street lights have been installed on both sides of the street and many sections include sidewalk. S. 180th Street is fronted by a variety of commercial enterprises and has a posted speed of 35 mph. B) Traffic Volumes Daily traffic counts in the vicinity of the proposed project were available from the City of Tukwila. The traffic volumes for the year 1991 were the most current values available at the writing of this report. Those volumes are shown on Figure 2. A discussion with City staff indicated that the traffic volumes in the immediate vicinity have increased by very small amounts over the past couple of years. A manual traffic count for the noon and PM peak hours was conducted for this study at the intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway. This count was compared with one conducted at this same intersection in April of 1993. Upon review of the two counts, it was found that the PM peak hour counts were almost identical, i.e., the most recent count was 6 vehicles fewer than the one in 1993. However, the most recent noon count was approximately 200 fewer vehicles than the 1993 count. Therefore, it was decided to use the 1993 counts for this study to reflect a more conservative approach. The tabulation of this count can be found in the Appendix. C) Transit /Pedestrian Facilities Transit service is readily available in the Southcenter area. Two METRO routes, #150 and #155, travel along S. 180th Street which is the closest to the site that Metro travels. Route 150 serves Auburn, Kent, Southcenter, and downtown Seattle, while route 155 serves downtown Renton, Fairwood, and Southcenter. Service is provided daily on both routes throughout the day. Service on other routes is also available from Southcenter Mall and run along streets to the north of the proposed development. Pedestrian facilities (sidewalks) have been installed along many street sections in the vicinity of the site. The City of Tukwila is trying to encourage pedestrian activity in 'order to eliminate some of the automobile trips in the area. No sidewalk exists in the immediate vicinity of the driving range. D) Level of Service The intersection in the area which would be most critically impacted by the development of the subject site, i.e., S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway, was analyzed with respect to level of service. This intersection is controlled by a traffic signal. "Level of service" is a common term used in the Traffic Engineering profession which is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and its perception by motorists and /or passengers. These conditions are usually described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are designated, ranging from A to F,• 4 SOURCE: 1991 CITY OF TUKWI LA TRAFFIC FLOW MAP r3421 1... Ito c7ei' itd 16800 29600 1 WKWILA PKWY. STRAN D ER BLVD. 19 1-5 ANDOVER PARK W 13400 500 22100 94400 S. 180TH ST. 49 0 20400 fi 10600 32700 3 1-405 27400 WEST VALL 1900 PROJECT SITE NORTH 32600 CURRENT AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES FIGURE 2 5 with level of service "A" representing the best operating conditions and level of service "F" the worst. The first step in the capacity analysis of an existing intersection is to manually count all traffic movements during the critical peak -hour period(s). A manual traffic count was conducted for both the noon and PM peak hours at the intersection as part of this analysis. The intersection is then analyzed, taking into account all of the physical features and methods of traffic control. This process produces a rating for the intersection that defines a "level - of- service" for each vehicle. An expanded explanation of "level of service ", along with the tables which identify the criteria for analyzing unsignalized and signalized intersections respectively, as presented in the Highway Capacity Manual, has been provided in the Appendix. The actual capacity of an intersection is generally considered to be at the lower end of level of service "E" and most agencies strive to maintain a roadway network that will not drop below this level of operation, except perhaps during unusual periods such as holiday shopping, sporting events, etc. Calculations for the level of service for the intersections were conducted using the computer program CAPCALC '85, by Roger Creighton and Associates, Inc., which is based on the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. The manual traffic counts described earlier were used in these analyses and are shown in the Appendix. The following table shows the current level of service for the intersection. TABLE 1 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE LOCATION HOUR (DELAY) S. 180th Street/ NOON C ( 25 sec.) Southcenter Pkwy. PM C ( 25 sec.) It can be seen from Table 1 that the intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway is operating under capacity (level of service "E" or better). The seconds of delay shown in Table 1 is the average delay for the intersection movements overall; individual critical movements may be operating at a lower level of service. patron will stay about 45 minutes to an hour. The estimated daily and peak hour trips for the driving range are summarized in Table 2. As noted earlier, a more detailed description of how these numbers were derived is included in the Appendix. TABLE 2 TRIP GENERATION TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE TIME PERIOD TOTAL TRIPS Daily Noon Peak Enter Exit Total PM Peak Enter Exit Total 765* 35 34 69 37 32 69 * - Estimated; based on the percentage of PM peak hour trips to daily trips for golf courses of approximately 9 %. 2. Trip Distribution /Assignment The new traffic generated by the development of the driving range will be distributed onto the adjacent roadway system and then onto the regional transportation system. The closest driving ranges are located in Kent, Federal Way, and Beacon Hill and therefore the driving range will attract from the surrounding area. The driving range is also expected to attract patrons from the adjacent employment area during their lunch hours and after work. Furthermore, trips to the driving range would likely be part of dual purpose trip where some members of the family go to the mall while others go to the driving range. The trips from the site will be dispersed in all directions towards the regional transportation systems in the area, i.e., SR -518, I -5, I -405, and towards the major arterials such as West Valley Highway or S. 180th Street. Figure 3 shows the estimated trip distribution by percent for the subject site. It should be noted that these values are approximate and may vary from day to day depending on the needs and desires of the future patrons of the driving range. Figures 4 and 5 show the trip assignment to the various streets during the noon and PM peak hours. It can be seen from these figures that the project will have its greatest impact on S. 180th Street and Southcenter Parkway. 3. Traffic Volumes The projected 1995 average daily traffic volumes both with 9 ESTIMATED TRIP DISTRIBUTION 10 ili 1 _ � 4f H�E�E~ e�vfl � TUKWU.A PKWY. 111 ftgalar �'�<� ; co �0 1 1 = A ' oo STRANDER BLVD. ZEii8 : ti9 4 l r w a W Z w 0 Z v- 10 0 1 -5 11 S. 1 SpTH ST. 30 0 cc 0 0 z 29 17 17 3 AN H12 PROJECT SITE WEST VAL 1 -405 NORTH ESTIMATED NOON PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT .FIGURE 4 11 ESTIMATED PM PEAK HOUR TRIP ASSIGNMENT. FIGURE 5 and without the development are shown on Figure 6. The 1991 traffic volumes shown on Figure 2 were increased two percent per year to estimate the 1995 volumes plus the trips from a new retail site at S. 180th Street /Andover Park West were also included. The projected noon and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway for the year 1995 both with and without the proposed project have been included in the Appendix. 4. Level of Service Level of service calculations were conducted again for the intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway. It has been assumed for the purposes of analysis that geometric conditions at the intersection are unchanged from existing conditions. It is estimated that the proposed development would be essentially complete and occupied in 1995. The existing traffic volumes were increased by 2% to account for miscellaneous background growth which may occur over the next year plus the trips from a new retail site at S. 180th Street /Andover Park West were also included. This could essentially be considered a "no- action" scenario or base condition. The future conditions were then reviewed with the trips from the proposed project added. The results of the future conditions are shown in Table 3. TABLE 3 1995 LEVELS OF SERVICE PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION HOUR W /OUT PROJECT W /PROJECT S. 180th Street/ NOON D ( 29 sec.) D ( 30 sec.) Southcenter Pkwy. PM D ( 27 sec.) D ( 28 sec.) The results of the capacity analyses indicate that the levels of service at the intersection would drop slightly over the next year as a result of the miscellaneous traffic growth occurring in the area. The trips from the proposed driving range would have a limited impact at the intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway. 5. Transit Usage As noted earlier, some transit service is available along S. 180th Street. It is unlikely that patrons of this development would use transit due to the recreational nature of the site which tends not to draw transit riders. 13 e 37170 Afil 37210) NptN�~ OV' SVS ifor131 (1 31 1 • 0, TUKWIU PKWY. fi fl' H OJ G (1 1 00 40) m 18190 3213. (18190) (32140 XX — 1995 AWDT W /OUT PROJECT (XX) — 1995 AWDT W /PROJECT 1 -5 STRANDER BLVD. 2 (2 14590 30) 450 80) 21,520 (21 70) ANDOVER PARK W 1 20 (10 00) 180TH ST. 22720 (23100) 53.0 5• =0) ANDOVER PARK E. 1 500 (11540) PROJECT SITE • 29760 -� 29870) C 1 -405 NORTH w' 35880 34770 6 0 _ 34880) ce 35440 (35480) 1995 ESTIMATED AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUMES. FIGURE 6 14 Patrons of the driving range will be bringing their golf clubs to the site which are somewhat cumbersome to transport on a bus and therefore private vehicles will be the transportation mode of choice. 6. Pedestrians The proposed driving range is located along a street which currently has no sidewalks or pathways. The closest pedestrian facility lies several hundred feet to the north at S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway. It is difficult to assess how many pedestrians a specific development may attract, however, it is unlikely that a driving range would attract many pedestrians because patrons to the site will be bringing their own golf clubs which are not easy to carry for long distances. Also, the majority of patrons will be arriving from areas not within walking distance of the site. The need for sidewalks along the section of Southcenter Parkway south of S. 180th Street is not as urgent as the need along areas closer to the mall. The land uses along this section of Southcenter Parkway are industrial in nature and do not tend to attract pedestrians. Although the section of Southcenter Parkway south of S. 180th Street may ultimately be improved. to urban standards (including sidewalk), the existing uses and the proposed use would not dictate the need for sidewalk installation at the present time. 7. Access One driveway will serve the site from Southcenter Parkway. A level of service analysis was conducted for the driveway for the trips entering and exiting the site. The estimated driveway volumes are shown in the Appendix. The following table shows the results of these analyses. TABLE 4 1994 LEVELS OF SERVICE SITE ACCESS PEAK LEVEL OF SERVICE LOCATION HOUR (RESERVE CAPACITY) S. 180th Street/ Noon EB - A ( 463) Site Driveway NB - E ( 81) PM EB - A ( 423) NB - E ( 55). The results of the capacity analyses show that the trips. 15 entering and exiting the site should experience relatively little inconvenience or delay during the peak hours due to the relatively low volumes on this section of Southcenter Parkway. C) Impacts The proposed driving range will generate additional traffic which will impact the roadways in the area, although it is expected that this amount of traffic will be significantly less when compared to the numerous retail sites in the area. No data on trip generation was available for driving ranges, so field data was collected from comparable sites in the area for use in estimating the amount of traffic associated with the site. Several capital improvement projects in the Southcenter area have been identified by the City of Tukwila. A proportionate share of the costs would apply to the subject development. No further analyses were conducted for these locations since the City has already identified the necessary improvements and their costs. The adjacent intersection of S. 180th Street /Southcenter Parkway is projected to be at level of service "D" and therefore improvements do not appear to be necessary. The trips entering and exiting the site are not expected to experience any difficulty. The small number of left -turns would not necessitate a left -turn lane on Southcenter Parkway. The five locations in the vicinity of the project which the City has identified for capital improvements are summarized . below, along with the estimated number of trips from the site traveling through these locations during the noon and PM peak hours. LOCATION S. 180th Street/ West Valley Highway Interurban Avenue/ I -405 Interchange Strander Boulevard/ Southcenter Parkway Strander Boulevard/ Andover Park West Strander Boulevard/ Andover Park East PEAR HOUR TRIPS 24 noon trips 24 PM trips 10 noon. trips. 9 PM trips 17 noon trips 19 PM trips 2 noon trips 2 PM trips 2 noon trips 1 PM trips 16 The City of Tukwila has developed a per trip mitigation fee at these locations for future improvements. D) Mitigation The following are suggested as possible mitigation measures for the development. 1. Payment of $475 per trip through the intersection of S. 180th Street /West Valley Highway for future roadway improvements for a total of $11,400. 2. Payment of $1000 per trip through the intersection of Interurban Avenue /I -405 Interchange for future roadway improvements for a total of $10,000. 3. Payment of $140 per trip through the intersection of Strander Boulevard /Southcenter Parkway for future roadway improvements for a total of $2,380. 4. Payment of $317 per trip through the intersection of Strander Boulevard /Andover Park West for future roadway improvements for a total of $634. 5. Payment of $135 per trip through the intersection of Strander Boulevard /Andover Park East for future roadway improvements for a total of $270. DRIVING RANGE TRIP GENERATION INFORMATION Kaddyshack Golf Range - 4003 204th Street SW, Lynnwood - 36 tees plus putting and chipping areas and pro -shop - 39 noon trips (17 in, 22 out) - 41 PM trips (23 in, 18 out) Noon trip rate - 1.08 trips per tee (44% inbound, 56% outbound) PM trip rate - 1.14 trips per tee (56% inbound, 44% outbound) SuperRange - 511 128th Street SE, Everett - 50 tees plus scramble course, video rooms, pro -shop, and restaurant - 57 noon trips (32 in, 25 out) - 53 PM trips (27 in, 26 out) Noon trip rate - 1.14 trips per tee (56% inbound, 44% outbound) PM trip rate - 1.06 trips per tee (51% inbound, 49% outbound) Weighted Average of Two Sites: Noon trip rate - 1.12 trips per tee (51% inbound, 49% outbound) PM trip rate - 1.09 trips per tee (53% inbound, 47% outbound) A "per tee" trip rate of 1.15 will be used for both the noon and PM peak hour in order to be conservative, with the inbound and outbound splits as calculated for the weighted average. Additional Information Collected. Redwood Golf Center - 13029 Redmond - Woodinville Road NE, Redmond - 60 tees on two levels - 82 trips between 11:30 AM and 1:30 PM (45 in, 37 out) - 61 trips between 4:00 and 6:00 PM (29 in, 32 out) LEVEL OF SERVICE (The following are excerpts from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209.) The concept of level of service is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists and /or passengers. A level -of- service definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are defined for each facility for which analysis procedures are available. They are given letter designations, from A to F, with level -of- service A representing the best operating conditions and level -of- service F the worst. 1. Level -of- service definitions - In general, the various levels of service are defined as follows for uninterrupted flow facilities: - Level -of- service A represents free flow. Individual users are virtually unaffected by the presence of others in the traffic stream. Freedom to select desired speeds and to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely high. The general level of comfort and convenience provided to the motorist, passenger, and pedestrian is excellent. - Level -of- service B is in the range of stable flow,,• but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable. Freedom to select desired speeds is relatively unaffected, but there is a slight decline in the freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream from level of service A. The level of comfort and convenience provided is somewhat less than at level of service A, because the presence of others in the traffic stream begins to affect individual behavior. - Level -of- service C is in the range of stable flow, but marks the beginning of the range of flow in which the operation of individual users becomes significantly affected by the interactions with others in the traffic stream. The selection of speed is now affected by the presence of others, and maneuvering within the traffic stream requires substantial vigilance on the part of the user. The general level of comfort and convenience declines noticeably at this level. - Level -of- service D represents high - density, but stable, flow. Speed and freedom to maneuver are severely restricted, and the driver or pedestrian experiences a generally poor level of comfort and convenience. Small increases in traffic flow will generally cause operational problems at this level. - Level -of- service E represents operating conditions at or near the capacity level. All speeds are reduced to a low, but relatively uniform value. Freedom to maneuver within the traffic stream is extremely difficult, and it is generally accomplished by forcing a vehicle or pedestrian to "give way" to accommodate such maneuvers. Comfort and convenience levels are extremely poor, and driver or pedestrian frustration is generally high. Operations at this level are usually unstable, because small increases in flow or minor perturbations within the traffic stream will cause breakdowns. - Level -of- service F is used to define forced or breakdown flow. This conditions exists whenever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Operations within the queue are characterized by stop- and -go waves, and they are extremely unstable. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or more, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Level -of- service F is used to describe the operating conditions within the queue, as well as the point of the breakdown. It should be noted, however, that in many cases operating conditions of vehicles or pedestrians discharged from the queue may be quite good. Nevertheless, it is the point at which arrival flow exceeds discharge flow which causes the queue to form, and the level -of- service F is an appropriate designation for such points. These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe them. For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational parameters which best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions, limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels of, service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness," and represent those available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject facility type. Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of conditions for which boundaries are established. The following tables describe level of service for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay . Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level -of- service criteria are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15- minute analysis period. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is measured in terms of unused, or reserve capacity of the lane in question. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - LEVEL OF SERVICE Stopped Delay Per Level Of Service Vehicle (sec) A less than 5.1. B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F greater than 60.0 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - LEVEL OF SERVICE Reserve Expected Delay to Level Of Service Capacity Minor Street Traffic A 400+ Little or no delay. B 300 -399 Short traffic delay. C 200 -299 Average traffic delay. D 100 -199 Long traffic delays. E 0 -99 Very long traffic delays. F <0 The level of service for a four -way stop controlled intersection is not as well - defined as other forms of control. The following three tables show the capacity for a four -way stop and approximate level of service "C" volumes for four -way stop - controlled intersections. CAPACITY OF TWO -BY -TWO LANE FOUR -WAY STOP - CONTROLLED INTERSECTION FOR VARIOUS DEMAND SPLITS DEMAND SPLIT CAPACITY (VPH)* 50/50 1900 55/45 1800 60/40 1700 65/35 1600 70/30 1500 * Total Capacity, All Legs CAPACITY OF FOUR -WAY STOP - CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS WITH 50/50 DEMAND SPLIT FOR VARIOUS APPROACH WIDTHS INTERSECTION TYPE CAPACITY (VPH)* 2 -lane by 2 -lane 1900 2 -lane by 4 -lane 2800 4 -lane by 4 -lane 3600 * Total Capacity, All Legs APPROXIMATE LEVEL -OF- SERVICE C SERVICE VOLUMES FOR FOUR -WAY STOP - CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS DEMAND SPLIT 50/50 55/45 60/40 65/35 70/30 LOS C SERVICE VOLUME, VPH NUMBER OF LANES 2 BY 2 1200 1140 1080 1010 960 2 BY 4 1800 1720 1660 1630 1610 4 BY 4 2200 2070 1970 1880 1820 `i' i .) _0) I>> i(fa (1 �f • .toirkrs,"/„//, NOON PEAK HOUR 12:00 -1:0 0 H 779 PM PEAK HOUR 3:15 -4:1 5 985 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 145 403 �- 147 376 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 745 83 222 1 1526 781 T 517 Alk N S. 180TH STREET 526 255 < B40 59 108 3 X76 149 496 187 $336 $1043 547 1655 > 815 S. 180TH STREET 169 269 327 654 F- 58 119 331 204 27 E 142 COUNT DATE: APRIL 8 & 13. 1993 101 181 323 458 53 861 76 1387 526 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES S. 180TH STREET /SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY. NOON PEAK HOUR H 820 PM PEAK HOUR 1033 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 151 4244c--- 153 812 87 396 ' > 236 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 3 1 156 550 1754E-1\-->315 $1654 842 574 270 112 197 1353 1146 596 t 685 E-- 123 60 82 481 N S. 180TH STREET 577 62 909 1801 -->892 S. 180TH STREET 368 80, 105. -> 588 929 1517 190 338 56 1995 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WITHOUT PROJECT. S. 180TH STREET /SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY VOLUMES NOON PEAK HOUR 824 PM PEAK HOUR 1 1037 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 823 11675 852 N S. 180TH STREET 426 E- 153 398 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. 98 236 175 687 < 123 350 5 186 270 122 226 1412 $1167 606 561 315 217 71 10 31 179 99 481 79 926 1835 - --> 909 S. 180TH STREET 368 98 115 -> 603 947 H 1550 217 $396 71 1995 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH PROJECT S. 180TH STREET /SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY NOON PEAK HOUR 69 PM PEAK HOUR 69 DRIVEWAY 35 H- 29 34 5 DRIVEWAY 186 30*4 156 1412 226 T 197 5 4 202 161 179 31 <-1, 148 37 4- 27 32 5 153 1 363 $396 217 190 196 $ 349 N SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 1995 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR. TRAFFIC VOLUMES. WITH PROJECT SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY /SITE .DRIVEWAY PARE INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE XN180SC 1994 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE urn ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT ____ ____ ____ EB L 147 169 1.00 169 1.00 0.00 T 222 255 1.00 255 0.00 0.00 R 7 8 1.00 8 0.00 1.00 WD L 59 71 1.00 71 1.00 0.00 TR 275 331 1.00 331 0.00 0.07 R 5O6 610 1.00 610 0.00 1.00 NB L 3 4 1.00 4 1.00 0.00 TR 184 2�2 1.00 252 0.00 0.41 SD L 517 TR 228 550 243 1.00 1.00 550 r43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF ADJUSTMENT FACTORS--------------- ADJ. • APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA PT LT FLOW -EB L 1 800 1 T 1800 1 R 1800! 1 -WB L 1800 1. TR 1800 1 R 1800 1 _NB L 1800 1 TR 1800 1 SB L 1800 TR 1:*:00 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1708 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798` 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 1117 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1728 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 0.97 0.99 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 0.95 1642 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1675 • 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 �1.00 0.92- 3181 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1"00 0.91 1.00 1605 _ DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/11/1994 TUKW[LA DRIVING RANGE XN180SC INTERSECTION : S, 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON 1994 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL ____________________________________ ________________________________________ TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CDNF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE EB -6 1 N 0 0 0.87 0 N 0.0 3 WB 0 1 N 0 2 0.83 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 2 N 0 0 0.73 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 2 N O. 2 0.94 0 N 0.0 3 ---------------- GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD __ ________________ EB 147 222 7 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 W8 59 255 526 L 1 11.0 TR 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 NB 3 108 76 L 1 11.0 TR 1 12.0 SB 517 83 145 L 2 22.0 TR 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE IST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R ..... __..... ____ __ _ _ EB 1 L L 20 80 EB 6 T R R 40 60 WB 2 L TR R R L 22 78 WB 4 R R 26 74 NB 3 L TR L R 20 80 SB 4 L TR L ' R '26 74 1-PAGE 1 _ INTERSECTION : / S, 178TH STREET @ i S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ I SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE XP180SC 1994 • CBD ? N VOLUME ADJUSTMENT ` ��F�` ' ' ` «�o r 1---4,0-L\ I APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE MIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS - MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR �ATE LT RT ____ ____ EB L 119 135 1.00 135 1.00 0.00 T 204 232 1.00 r32 0.00 0.00 R 8 9 1.00 9 0.00 1.00 WB L 76 84 1.00 84 1.00 0.00 / TR 458 503 1.00 503 0.00 0.00 | `' R 327 359 1.00 359 0.00 1.00 NB L 27 36 1.00 36 1.00 0.00 TR 154 205 1.00 205 0.00 0.34 [ SB L 269 324 1.00 324 1.00 0.O0 i -11..: 227 273 1.00 27-. 0.00 0.75 L_ SATURATION FLOW {DEAL # OF --------------ADJUSTMENT FACTORS----------`---_- ADJ. MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 '17()8 T 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.()0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 R 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00!1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67. 1170 TR 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1746 R 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 L 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1642 TR 1800 1 1.n0 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1693 1800 2 0'fi 7 0,99 1.00 .0n 1.00 1. .92 3181 TR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1,00 1570 RETAKE PREVIOUS DOCUMENT NOON PEAK HOUR E-> 69 PM PEAK HOUR H 69 DRIVEWAY 35 mac- -- 29 34 5 DRIVEWAY 37 E-- 1412 226 186 30<1 156 197 5 <-4 202 161 179 31 <- V 148 27 32 5 $363 396 217 T 190 6 T 196 153 $ 349 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY 1995 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC. VOLUMES: WITH PROJECT SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY /SITE. DRIVEWAY.. PARE 1 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTEH PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE XN180SC 1994 CBD?N VOLUME ADJUSTMENT \ 5.3 .�A�' ' '��� �.���� APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADO FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT ____ ____ ____ 1 ED L 47 169 1.00 169 1.00 0.00 T 222 255 1.00 255 0.00 0.00 R 7 8 1.00 8 0.00 1.00 WB L 59 71 1.00 71 1.00 0.00 TR 275 331 1.00 331 0.00 0.07 R 506 610 1.00 610 0.00 1.00 NB L 3 4 1.".((")...) 0 4 1.00 0.00 TR 184 252 252 0.00 0.41 SB L.. 517 TR 228 550 243 1.00 1.00 550 243 SATURATION • FLOW 1.00 0,00 0.00 IDEAL # OF --ADJUSTMENT FACTORS--- ---------- ADJ. APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK EUS AREA LT FLOW 'EB L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0'95 1708 T 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 R 1800! 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 WE: L 1800 1. 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 '1117 TR 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0O 0.99 1.00 1728 R 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 NB L 1800 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.95 1642 TR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1675 SO L 1800 7 0.97 o.99 1.00 1.09 1,00 1.00 1,00 0.92 3181 TR 1 �00 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.91 1.00 1605 • PAGE 2 DAVID ) ^ HAMLIN & ASSUCJA|Eb TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 1807H STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOi/THCENTFR PKWY, WEEKDAY NOON 1994 CBD ? N ACTUATED SIGNAL 1. /z�r��^`r--- XN180SC CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO � ��� - ����� �- ��� ������ �- ��� � • - � ---- ^ �rop o'U90 Y 0.200 342 0.494 EB L ��`/ " ^'`~ -'' 355 T 255 0 1798 0.142 N 0.400 719 0.355 R 8 0 1529 0.005 N 0.400 612 0.013 P WB L 71 0 1117 0.064 N 0.220 246 0.289 TR 331 0 1728 0.192 Y 0.2r0 380 0.U/z R 610 0 1469 0.415 N 0.480 705 0.865 NB L 4 0 1642 0.002 N 0.200 328 0.012 TR 752 0 1675 0.150 Y 0.200 335 0.752 SB L 550 0 3181 0.173 Y 0.260 827 0.665 TR 243 0 16O� 0.151 N 0.260 417 0.583 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0,614 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.722 ___________________________________- _________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE L':1 GR V/C SREEN CYC 1*t LN GR 2nd LN GR \N GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LD5 ---- - - - ----- -- --- --- L 0 4�4 0 200 100 27.0 342 0;9 1.00 27.9 /D �� ^ ^ 0 1 0 85 13 6 8 T 0.355 0.400 100 15.9 719 . . . 1q 2 C R 0^013 0^400 100 13.8 612 0.0 0.85 11.7 8 . W8 L 0~299 �)^220 100 24.7 246 0.2 0.85 21.2 C T'� 0'871 0.220 100 23 6 380 13.4 0.85 35.7 D F O'� 5 �)^48O 10�) 17~6 705 7./ 0.85 21.5 C 26.1 D '^''^. .^.'`^ ^^^ �^ � �7n 0.0 1.00 24.4 C �'� ' �' «`/ » '' ��'`' ^-'` ~-- 29 5 D ` �R 0'752 0`00 100 �8.6 3J5 6.� 0.85 29.7 0 . , SD 0.665 0.260 100 25.� 8l7 1.4 1.00 26.6 D ;R 0^5R3 0^260 100 -4.5 417 1.5 0.85 22.1 C 25.2 D INTERSECTION DPLAY: 25.0 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : C ;�� k ; cr INTERSECTION S, 178TH STREET @ i S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/11/1994 TUkWlLA DRIVING RANGE XN180SC 1994 CBD?N --------------------------------------- TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) YIN Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) YIN SEC TYPE ____ EB -6 1 N 0 0 0.87 0 N 0.0 3 WB 0 1 N 0 2 0.83 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 2 N 0 0 0.73 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 2 N 0 2 0.94 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME .1 2 � APP LT TH • RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD _____ EB 147 222 7 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 WE 59 255 526 L 1 11.0 TR 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 NB 3 108 76 L 1 11.0 TR 1 12.0 SB 517 83 145 L 2 22.0 TR 1 12.0 - . ___________________________ SIGNAL PHA3ING • APP PHASE 18T MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G v+R ___ -__ ____ __ ___ EB 1 L L 2( 80 .� 60 R 40 EB 6 T R WB 2 L TR R R ` L 22 78 WB 4 R R 26 • 74 NB 3 L TR L R 20 80 • SB 4 L� TR L R 26 74 1/11/1994 DAVID D 7:. F-I(tP'li.... 1: tai & ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION XNi1BO;7(::; • 145. sB TOTAL 745 v. • 83 51.7 ri'8TH STREET /W STREET a' E. i.:3 TOTAL :376 222 7 N .7 S(J .1..1..1-•IC;E.N T F.R PKWY. • • .526 N/8 STREET 1. 2 v *> WE TOTAL v S. 1BO-) -L..l STREET E/W STREET. T t : (')(.1'I'l...lt.;l . I'.,l •l•E R . PKWY „ NB, 11 UAL.. 18.7 1 0 hi 1 1 1 1 PAGE 1 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE XP180SC INTERSECTION : S, 178TH STREET @ • S. t80TH STREET SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ | SOUTHCENTER PKWY. / ` WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL 1/11/1994 1994 CBD ? N VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GRDUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL Al, FLOW [ MVM VOLUME. IN 8RO1...1P FACTOR RATE ________ ______ ____ EB L. 119 135 1.00 135 | T 204 232 1.00 r32 / R 8 9 1.00 9 WB L 76 84 1.00 84 TR 458 503 1.00 503 R 327 359 1.00 359 NB L 27 31:1 1.00 36 TR 154 205 1.00 205 BB 269 324 1.00 TR 227 273 1.00 324 273 SATURATION FLOW ���'` ' ' ` .c_ \%r��- PROP OF TURNS LT RT 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 IDEAL # OF ----'---------ADJUSTMENT FACTORS----------`----- ADJ„ APP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW __ ____ ____ ____ E�' L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1708 T 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 R 1800 1. 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00/1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 WB L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 1170 TR 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1746 R 1900 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 NB L 1.900 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1642 TR 1.900 1 1.«0 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1693 180() 2 0...-47 0,99 1.00 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0792 3181 TR 1800 1 1.o0 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0089 1000 1573 PA GE 2 INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL ' � DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSDCIA[ES 1/11/1994 TUKWlLA DRIVING RANGE XP180SC 1994 CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS LN OR AD,) FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW El W Rr RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ____ _____ ______ _____ ______ _____ ________ _____ EB L 135 0 1708 0.079 Y 0.180 307 0.440 232 0 1798 0.129 N 0.490 881 0.263 R 9 0 1529 0.006 N 0.490 749 0.012 WB L 84 0 1170 0.072 N 0.310 363 0.231 TR 503 0 1746 0.288 y 0.310 541 0.930 R 359 0 1469 0.244 N 0.520 764 0.470 NB L 36 0 1642 0.022 N 0.180 296 0.122 TR 205 c 1A93 0.121 Y 0.180 305 0.672 SB L 324 0 71.81 0.102 N 0.210 668 0.485 TR 273 0 1.570 0.174 Y 0.210 330 0.827 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM or CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.662 LOSS TJME PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSEC}ION V/C : 0.779 LE‘..! EL U F SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC '1st LN GR 2nd LN OR LN OR APp APP APP MVM RAT]O RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS __ _____ ___ ___ E8 L 0.440 0.180 100 27.7 307 0.7 1.00 28.4 D T 0.263 0.490 100 11.3 881 0.0 0.85 9.6 8 !::.,! 0.012 0.490 100 9.9 749 0.0 0.85 8.4 B 16.3 C WB L 0.231 0.310 10; 1+.5 3,1:::.3 0.1 0.85 16.7 C T� (.'Y.\o C.%!:10 1n'` 2H.4 �41 1(,...5 0.85 35.6 D R 0.4/; 0.520 100 11.6 764 0.4 0.85 10.2 B 24.3' C u•f:.: /_ 6'1','2 0 /�') �``.1 296 0./� 1'00 26.1 D 7R 0.672 0.180 100 �9.1 305 3.9 0.85 28.0 D. 27.6 D �B L 0.485 0.210 100 668 9.5 1,00 26.9 D TR 0.827 0.?10 100 28.7 330 10.8 0,85 33.6 D 29.9 D INTFRSFClI(/N DELAY : 24.8 s(~cs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : C DAVID l. HAMLIN & 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE XP180SC INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1994 CBD?N ACTUATED SIGNAL _____________________________________________ TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS FED BUTTON ARR APP <%> (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N. SEC TYPE ___ ____ __________ __________ ____ • EB -6 1 N 0 0 0.88 0 N 0.0 3 WB 0 1 N 0 2 0.91 0 N 0.0 it NB 0 2 N 0 0 0.75 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 2 N 0 2 0.83 0 N 0.0 3 GEOHETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 AFT'. LT TH • RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS • WD MVM LNS WD EB 119 204 8 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 WB 76 458 327 L 1 11.0 TR i 11.0 R 1 11.0 NB 27 101 83 L 1 11.0 TR 1 12.0 SB 269 58 169 L 2 22.0 TR 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT ' PMSV G Y+R ___ _____ __ EB 1 L 18 82 EB 6 T R R 49 51 WB 2 L TR R R L . 31 69 WB 4 R R ' 21 79 NB 3 L TR L R 18 82 SB 4 L TR L R. 21` 79 :1/1:3./1.994 DAVID I. i-aAf=1I....1N & ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION XP1BOSC SB TOTAL 13.96 1 v 58 269 :I. ......w.. -.s�. v 9. 1.-TH STREET EilA STREET _.. 1. :3.. r ._... . E6 TOTAL 331 204 8 v SoL.1THrF:NTFR PKWY. I \3 /B STREET 327 W13 TOTAL 41E3 861 76 v S. 180TH STREET. Y 1 E/W STREET.' '33..1.1..1-.1 C":I I \3 "I" ER F•' k:. VJY „ • • N/S S-rr:,Ef...l. .Y,..__......... v 101 . , NB _Tt1 3..PL : . PAGE 1 _ INTERSECTION : 1 S. 178TH STREET - S. 180TH STREET @ 5OUTHCENTER PKWY. SOUTHCENTER PKWY. � WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD 7 N 1/11/1g94 SC180FN \o\c")c� P1jUc*` u4u�� � \5S)r�+`` -~f\�� VOLUME ADJUSTMENT APPROACH LANE GROUP FLOW RATE LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW PROP OF TURNS MVM VOLUME IN GROUP FACTOR RATE LT RT ________ ______ ____ ____ ____ ED L 153 176 1.00 176 1.00 0.00 T 236 271 1.00 271 0.00 0.00 R 7 8 1.00 8 0.00 1.00 WB L 62 75 1.00 75 1.00 0.00 TR 290 349 1.00 349 0.00 0.07 R 557 671 1.00 671 0.00 1.00 NB L 3 4 1.00 4 1.00 0.00 TR 194 766 1.00 266 0.00 0.42 Si L 574 611 1.00 611 1.00 0.00 TR 238 253 1.00 253 0.00 0.63 SATURATION FLOW IDEAL # OF --- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ---- ---_------ ADJ. �PP MVM SAT FLOW LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW __ _ �1.3 L 1800 1 0.97 1.0O 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1708 T 1800 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 8 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 WB L 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 / 1.00 1.00 0.62 1083 TR 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1728 8 1800 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 NB L 1800 1. 0,97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1642 TR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1675 �•'., L 1W.Jo � 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 31.81. TR 1800 1 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.91 1.00 1605 1 PAGE 2 INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SO\]THLENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS 1/11/1994 SC180FNI .� LN GR ADO FLOW PMSV ADO SAT FLOW GREEN IN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FIN RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ---- ----- - . EB L 176 0 1708 0.103 Y 0.200 342 0.515 T 271 0 1798 0.151 N 0.400 719 0.377 R 8 0 1529 0.005 N 0,400 612 0.013 WS L 75 0 1083 0.069 N 0.220 238 0.315 TR 349 0 1728 0.202 Y 0.220 380 0.918 R 671 0 1469 0.457 N 0.480 705 0.952 NB L 4 0 1642 0.002 N 0.200 328 0.012 TR 266 0 1+75 o.159 Y 0.200 335 0.794 S8 L 611 » 3!q1 0.192 Y 0.260 827 0.739 TR 253 0 1605 0.158 N 0.260 417 0.607 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0^656 LOSS TINE PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.772 LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC :Isl.: LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APp APP MVH RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAF` DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LUb ___ _____ _____ ___ ____ ___ _____ __ _____ ___ _____ EB L 0.515 0.200 100 27.1 342 1.1 1.00 28.2 D 0.377 0.400 100 16.1 719 0.2 0.85 13.9 B R 0.013 0.400 100 1.-r..8 612 0.0 0,85 11.7 D 19,4 0 WD L 0.315 0.220 100 22',-8 2� 8 238 0.3 0.85 21.3 C TR 0.918 0'220 100 ?�,0 �,;90 19.1 0.85 40.9 E 0.952 0.480 100 l',-.9 705 16.7 0.85 30.3 D 33.1 0 ND i 0.012 0.200 10x ~'..4 32::i 0.0 1.00 24,4 0 TR 0.794 0.200 100 �8,9 335 8.4 0.85 31.7 D 31.5 D SE: 0,739 0.260 100 25.8 827 2.5 1.00 28.3 D TR 0.607 0.260 100 24.7 417 1.8 0.85 22.5 C 26.6 D INTERSFCT/ON DELAY : 28.5 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : D INTERSECTION S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL APP ___ EB WB NB SB DAVID I. HAMLIN & AE:80CIATE:6 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE SC180FN 1995 CBD?N TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHI': (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE ____ __________ __________ -6 1 N 0 0 0.87 0 O 1 N 0 2 0.83 0 O 2 N 0 0 0.73 0 O 2 N • 0 2 0.94 0 N 0.0 3 N 0.0 3 N 0.0 3 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH R MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD EB 153 236 7 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R • 1 11.0 WB 62 270 577 L 1 11.0 |R 1 11.0 R 1 • 11.0 NB 3 112 02 L 1 11.0 TR 1 12.0 88 574 87 151 L • 2 2r.0 TR 1 12.0 APP EB EB WB WB NB SB _ PHASE 1 6 2 4 3 4 SIGNAL PHASING 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PRDT PMSV . • G Y+R L L 20 80 • T R R 40 60 L TR R R L 22 78 R R 26 74 L TR L R 20 80 L TR L R 26 74 1/11/1994 DAVID I. H(N1....1N , ?< f-ASS(::OC1(- 1.7.ES • INTERSECTION SC a. E3OFN SD TOTAL 812 1-5:I. 574 v 87 E, STREET' E8 TOTAL 396 ./ V W —.1- E. ::3( :1!..1"FHc: ENTER PKWY. 577 N/S STREET / :i WD TOTAL • 270 909 .� • S. 1BO H STREET E/W STREET ... — 1 v 1 1 , E. Y E 0l.l•'f'F-lt.: E :NTE:R PKWY. N/S .STREET. PAGE 1 INTERSECTION : ) S. 178TH STREET @ } S. 180TH STREET 8 SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. _WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL APPROACH LANE GROUP MVM VOLUME EB WB _ NB 123 217 R 8 L 80 TR 481 R 368 L 29 • TR 161 SB L 315 TR 235 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/11/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 VOLUME FLOW RATE IN GROUP 140 247 9 88 529 404 39 215 380 283 CBD N SC180FP ■\c�(x�� [�[�� / /� � ' � 9--«n-6 o^� 1(P\-\- So\/����c�--��� ADJUSTMENT LANE UTIL FACTOR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 SATURATION IDEAL # OF MVM 3A1 F}'OW iANES R 1800 1 1800 1 1800 1 1800 1 TR 1800 l 1800 1 1800 1 TR 1800 1 R 1800 TR 1800 1 ADJ FLOW RATE 1.4.0 • 247 9 88 529 404 39 215 380 FLOW PROP OF TURNS LT RT ____ 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 ---_ADJUSTMENT FACTORS-------------- W]DTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 / 1.00 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.99 1. 1,00 1.00 1"00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00 ADJ. FLOW __ 1708 1798 15r9 1152 1746 1469 1642 1693 3181 1570� PAGE 2 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD 7 N CAPACITY ANALYSIS 1/11/1994 SC180FP| LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO GRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ____ _______ ______ _____ ______ _____ ________ _____ EB L 140 0 1708 0.082 V 0.180 307 0.456 T 247 0 1798 0.137 N 0.490 881 0.280 R 9 0 1.829 0.006 N 0.490 749 0.012 WB L 88 0 1152 0.076 N 0.310 357 0.246 TR 529 0 1746 0.303 Y 0.310 541 0.978 R 404 0 1469 0.275 N 0.520 764 0.529 NB L 39 0 1642 0.024 N 0.180 296 0.132 TR 215 0 1 693 0.127 Y 0.180 305 0.705 SB L 380 0 3181 0.119 N 0.210 668 0.569 TR 283 0 • 1570 0.180 Y 0.210 330 0.858 CYCLE LENGTH : 100,0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.692 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.814 __________________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN EB L 0.456 0.180 100 0.280 0.490 100 0.012 0.490 100 WB L 0.246 0.310 100 TR 0.'47P 031C 100 0.529 n.520 100 NB L 0.132 0,121;:, 103 TR 0.705 0.180 100 SB L 0.569 0.210 100 TR 0,858 0.210 100 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LDS _ _ _ __ __ ____ 27.8 307 0.8 1.00 28.6 D � � 11.5 881 0.0 0.85 9.8 B 9.9 749 0.0 0.85 8.4 B 16.4 C 19.6 357 0.1 0.88 16.7 C 2A.0 541 24.7 0.5 43.1 E I 12.1 764 0.6 0,85 10.8 0 28.0 0 7/..,.2 29(,... 0.0 1.00 26.2 D 29.3 305 4 9 0.85 29.1 D 28.5 0 I . . 26.9 668 0.9 1.00 27.8 D • 28.9 330 13.6 0.85 36.1 D 31^3 10 I INTERSECTlON DELAY : 27.0 secs/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE : D INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID IA HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD?N 1/11/1994 SC180FP TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE ___ _____ _________ ____ ____ ______ --- _ __________ EB -6 1 N 0 0 0.88 0 N 0.0 3 WB 0 1 N 0 2 0.91 0 N 0.0 3 ' NB 0 2 N 0 0 0.75 0 N 0.0 :3 BB 0 2 N 0 2 0.83 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 `` APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD ___ ----- EB 123 217 8 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R 1 • 11.0 WB 80 481 368 L 1 11.0 TR 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 NB 29 105 56 L 1 11.0 TR 1 12.0 SB 315 60 175 L 2 22.0 TR 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y+R ___ _____ _____ __ ___ EB 1 L L. 18 • 82 EB 6 T R R 49 51 WB 2 L TR R R L 31 69 WB 4 R R 71 79 NB 3 L TR L R . 18 82, S6 4 L TR L R 21 79' :1./:1.:1./19911. 175 r:(1V1:T:) I. I-d(.MI....1:ICI ?.. ASSOCIATES • INTERSECTION Sc:11;OF'I "' 1'I r- D TOTAL SOLJTHC1- NTf.- I°t PKWY. - '368 550 N/S STREET WD,TOTAL 481. 9;: ?9 1 80 "1 , i v S. 178TH STREET EE/W STREET EE.T EB TOTAL 1. v S. 180TH STREET 1:= /W STREET 1. 1. 123 29• 2:I. f:3 :.;r)11 T'L°1C:L' N TI :I:4 PKWY. N /.8 ST.RFL„..L. N1 TOTAL., a 1 1 PAGE 1 INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ • S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTEH PKWY. @ ISOUTHCEN TER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL APPROACH EB i • WB NB GB LANE GROUP MVM VOLUME 153 236 R 9 79 TR 290 557 5 TR 221 574 TR 249 IDEAL APP MVM SAT FLOW EB 1800 1.800 1800 WB L 1200 TR 180; R 1800 NB 1800 1900 1800 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/13/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE :1.995 c \������ � . '-~� . -^~~ ` CBD ? N � VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FLOW RATE IN GROUP 176 271 10 95 349 671 7 303 611 7�5 LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW FACTOR RATE _ 1.00 176 1.00 271 1.00 10 1.00 95 1.00 349 1.00 671 1.00 7 1.00 303 1.00 1.00 611 265 SATURATION FLOW SC180DN PROP OF TURNS LT RT 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.S0 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 # OF --------------ADJUSTMENT FACTORS . ADJ. LANES WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA HT iJ FLOW ___ 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1708 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 • 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 1 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.O0 1.00 On 85 1.00 1529 :1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 0.62 1.083 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1728 1 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 1 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1642 1 1.00 0.99 1,00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 ;.93 1.00 1657 0.9; 0.99 1'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 318:1 1.00 0.99 1.0(1') 1.00 0,99 1.00 0.91 1.00 1605 PAGE 2 INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL APP EB �WB NE: DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/13/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS SC180DN LN GR ADJ FLOW PM5V ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ______ _____ ________ _____ L 176 0 1708 0.103 Y 0.200 342 0.515 1 271 0 1798 0.151 N 0.400 719 0.377 R 10 0 1529 0.007 N 0.400 612 0.016 L 95 0 1083 0.088 N 0.220 238 0.399 TR 349 0 1728 0.202 Y 0.220 380 0.918 R 671 0 1469 0.457 N 0.480 705 0.952 L 7 0 1642 0.004 N 0.200 7,128 0.021 TR 303 0 1657 0.1f43 Y 0.200 331 0.915 SB L 611 0 3181 0.192 Y 0.260 827 TR 265 0 1605 0.165 N 0.260 417 0.739 0.635 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS. : 0.680 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.800 __________ LEVEL OF SERVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS • DELAY LOS __ _____ ___ ED L 0.515 0.200 100 27.1 342 1.1 1.00 28.2 D T 0.377 0.400 100 16.1 719 0.r 0.85 13.9 B R ().016 0,400 100 13.8 612 0.0 0.85 11.7 B 19.4 C NB L 0.399 0.220 100 '.:5.3 238 0.6 0.85 22.0 C TR 0.918 0.220 100 79.; 380 19.1 0.85 40.9 E- R 0.952 0,480 100 18.9 705 16.7 0.85 30.3 D 32.9 D NH L 0.021 0.200 10 x/ *'1,4 32F 0_0 1.00 24.4 C TR 0.915 0.200 100 29.8 331 20.5 0.85 42.8 E SB L 0.739 0.260 100 ?5.8 877 2.5 1.00 28.3 D TR 0.635 0.260 100 ?4.9 417 2.2 0.85 23.0 C az INTER9ECT]0N DFLAY : 29.7 secs/veh • LEVEL OF 81-RVICE : D INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOU7HCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY NOON ACTUATED SIGNAL DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/13/1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE SC180DN 1995 CBD?N TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%> (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHI= (pods/hr) Y/N SEC TYPE ____ EB -6 1 N 0 0 0,87 0 N 0.0 3 WB 0 1 N 0 2 0.83 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 . 2 N 0 0 0.73 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 2 N 0 2 0.94 0 N 0.0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD _______ ________ _____________ ..... __ EB 153 236 9 L 1 11.0 T 1 11.0 R 1 11.0 . WB 79 270 577 L 1 11,0 TR 1 11.0 R 1 110 NB 5 122 99 L :1. 11.0 TR 1 12.0 SB 574 98 151 L. 2 22.0 TR 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING APP PHASE 1ST MV • 2ND MV 3RD MV PROT PMSV G Y.-1...R _ ..... _ EB 1 L L 20 80 EB /6 T R R 40 60 W8 2 • L TR R R • L 22 78 WB 4 R R • 26 74 NB 3 L TR L R 20 80 SB 4 L TR L• R ' ' 26 ' 74 1/13/1994 DAVID 1„ I I(' ML 1 I i:' ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION ;-3C :i. f 0I)N SF TOTAL 823 151 574 v 98 J E_ :E 1 ci ! AE._ 9 1. _....^..._ v SfjU'ri°IC EI\I"r E R F=' ; : :WY.„ N/8 STREET 1 1. L:C:)►...) rF-IC,E I'.ITER PI <W'Y 577 WE TOTAL 270 9';^6 79 v S. 180rF"I STREET E/W STREET 1 1.2.2 I''II3 .I..t.l..i..P l.... 1 1 1' APP ED L ) R WD L TR ( � R NO L PAGE :1. INTERSECTION : S. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAY PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL APPROACH ED WB NB SO LANE GROUP MVM VOLUME 123 T r17 10 L 98 TR 481 R 368 L 31 TR 186 315 TR 246 IDEAL OF� MVM SAT FLOW LANE�� 180(` 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 180') 18(!0 DAVID I. HAHLIN & ASSOCIATES 1/1.::./1994 TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD ? / €3V.� __� VOLUME ADJUSTMENT FLOW RATE IN GROUP 140 247 11 108 529 404 41 248 380 296 LANE UTIL ADJ FLOW FACTOR RATE 1.00 140 1.00 247 1.00 11 1.00 108 1.00 529 1.00 404 1.00 41 1.00 248 1.00 380 1.00 296 SATURATION FLOW PROP OF LT 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 TURNS' RT ____ 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.71 ----------_---ADJUSTMENT FACTORS-------------_- ADJ. WIDTH H.V. GRADE PARK BUS AREA RT LT FLOW 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.708 0,97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1798 0.97 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1529 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.65 1135 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1746 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 1469 0.97 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1642 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1060 1.00 0.94 1.00 1675 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 3181 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00: 1570 PAGE 2 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSUC]AlFS 1/13/1994 INTERSECTION : 8. 178TH STREET @ S. 180TH STREET @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. @ SOUTHCENTER PKWY. WEEKDAv PM PEAK ACTUATED SIGNAL TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE 1995 CBD ? N CAPACITY ANALYSIS SClOODP LN GR ADJ FLOW PMSV ADJ SAT FLOW GREEN LN GR V/C APP MVM RATE LT FLOW FLW RT RATIO CRIT ? RATIO CAPACITY RATIO ____ _______ ______ _____ ______ _____ ________ _____ LB L 140 0 1708 0.082 Y 0.180 307 0.456 T 247 0 1798 0.137 N 0.490 891 0.280 R 11 0 1529 0.007 N 0.490 749 0.015 we L 108 0 1135 0.095 N 0,310 352 0.307 TR 529 0 1746 0.303 Y 0.310 541 0.978 R 404 0 1469 0.275 N 0.520 764 0.529 NP L 41 0 1642 0.025 N 0.180 296 0.139 TR 248 0 1675 0.149 Y 0.14-i0 301 0.824 SB L 380 0 • 3181 0.119 N • ().210 668 0.569 TR 296 0 1570 0.189 Y 0.210 • 330 0.897 CYCLE LENGTH : 100.0 SUM OF CRITICAL LANES' FLOW RATIOS : 0.722 LOSS TIME PER CYCLE : 15 INTERSECTION V/C : 0.949 - LFVEL O RVICE LN GR V/C GREEN CYC 1st LN GR 2nd LN GR LN GR APP APP APP MVM RATIO RATIO LEN DELAY CAP DELAY PF DELAY LOS DELAY LOS --- ---/ -_-__ _--__ __- ----_ --- ----- -- ----- --- EB L 0.456 0.180 100 27.8 307 0.8 1.00 28.6 D T 0.280 0.490 100 11.5 881 0.0 0.85 9.8 B R 0.015 0.490 100 10.0 749 0.0 0.85 8.5 B 16.4 C WB L 0.307 0.310 100 20.0 �)52 0.2 0.85 17.2 C TR 0.978 0.310 100 2�.0 541 24,7 0.95 43.1 E R 0.529 0.52() 100 12.1 764 0.6. 0.85 10.8 8- 27.9 D NF- L 0139 0.180 10i. 2A.2 296 0.0 1.00 2A.? n TR 0'824 0.180 10" �0.0 301 11.4 0.85 35.2 D ..):3.8 D • SB L 0.569 0.210 10( 26.9 668 0.9 1.00 27,8 D TR 0.8,..)7-0.210 100 79.2 330 18.0 0.85 40.1 E �301 D INTERSECTION DELAY : 28.2 seci,.;/veh LEVEL OF SERVICE :. D vet § n 1 i L L l L DAVID I. hJi 11`'IL.., :I: N t';< ASSOCIATES 1/13/1994 'rI.11K:.w.L1....fl DRIVING RANGE SC1f°3cy ►DP INTERSECTION S. 178TH f= i"1"RE:E 1 @ S. 180TH STREET @ C$ 0:11.1 ".r. l...l c l :11.1." 1: :l PKWY. @ C:3f';L..1T 1•1C;fa\1.T'I: l: PKWY„ WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1993 C;ED?N ACTUATED SIGNAL T R ( F F° I C ; & R O A D W A Y C O N D I T I O N S C,I rA IDI : 1 IV ilI)j . PI::f::, L._N BUSES ;::, C:.C:;NF . F'1=.::I:if~:i PEI] BUTTON 11Rk APP ("7) (Y„) Y/M I'1m (I\Ib) F'FIF (p4'.d /hr) • Y/N '. "EC TYPE I\I () c a 0.138 0 Ni 0.0 ._ I`I l::a :;' 0.91 0 Nt 0.0 NI 0 c'a 0.75 0 N 0.0 ._ lu t_i 0.83 0 I\I 0.0. ... EB WE NB SB ) ii 1. :1. G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S LANE GROUPS i VC11._.UME :1 2 .. APP LT "1 1-1 R1' MVM i.._I'JS WD MVM 1...1'18 WI) MVM LNS WD EB j23 21. '' 10 7 I ... .I. 1.1.. ► a 1" 368 ( w k r �:L _ "l IIi 1 11.0 1 i lC :I. 11.0 R :I. 11.9 NB : :;:I. 113 7i. L. 1. :1.1.0 L•L; 1 12.0 to Se 318 7:1. 173 1 ".. ? 22.0 TR 1 12.0 SIGNAL PHASING . APP PHASE 3E: 1. s r" MV 2r'1n N'IV 3RD MV P F:f::1"T F°'NIE V G ,Y.FR EB :I. 1... 1... 18 82 EB t -_, 'T YR R 49 51 WE 2 i"1 { R R L 31 69. WB 4 R R. 21 /9. NE 3 L. I R • I.... R 18 82 SE r, }-r_, 21 1/13/1994 DAVID I. I- ?AI''II....I I I ; if. C:I. W1 r :s INTERSECTION SC,1 8c::rt_)F:: 175 SB TOTAL v 71 1 315 N W .....a..... E: r.; sC11_JTHC:;t N'rER PKWY. . 368 N/••' ;:ii •T R 1 =::?= T a WB TOTAL. 4.81 947 h• v •1 v S. ..,:,.. ELI PrPEFT :I.::...... . . E1 TOTAL. .150 21/ Ica .v c_ 3l:)t:.lyr•i.:.;C:i ::ir TE R PKWY. N / r:; STREET.' • 98 v 13. 1 E3OTH STREET. E/W STREET 1. 1 1.1'. "; 1 . ?: • :1 N TOTA.1.•. 21.7 DAVID J. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE INTERSECTION : DRIVEWAY @ SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY @ SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY WEEKDAY NOON PEAK 1995 UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH • • ( CB ��i� \ >�� D ?N ����\��^`~�~'~- 1/13/1994 UNSIGNALIZED CRITICAL GAPS -----------CRITICAL GAPS (SEC)---------- ApP LEFT TURN • THROUGH RIGHT TURN • 5 20 EB 6.30 NB 4.60 SB APP EB NB SB APP VOLUME ALLOCATION TO LANES LANE 1 LANE 2 L T R T R LANE 3 L T R 29 0 5 0 0 0 • 5 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 156 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNSIGNALIZED LANE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE A NB RESERVE CAPACITY 989 LEVEL OF f2;ER,'ICE A SB ||ESEVF iAPACITY LEVEL OF SBRVICE MAJOR TREET NR/B LANE 2 LANE 3 • DNSCACC DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TUKWILA DRIVING RANGE --'------ '---------- 1/13/1994 INTERSECTION : DRIVEWAY @ SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY @ SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY WEEKDAY NOON PEAK 1995 CBD?N UNSIGNALIZED - MAJOR STREET RUNS NORTH / SOUTH __________________________________ DNSCACC TRAFFIC & ROADWAY CONDITIONS GRADE HV ADJ. PKG LN. BUSES CONF. PEDS PED BUTTON ARR APP (%) (%) Y/N Nm (Nb) PHF (peds/hr) 'UN SEC TYPE ____ --- --------- ---- ---- EB 0 O N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 NB 0 8 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0.0 3 SB 0 8 N 0 0 0.90 0 N 0^0 3 GEOMETRICS / VOLUMES LANE GROUPS VOLUME 1 2 .3 APP LT TH RT MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD MVM LNS WD ___ EB 29 0 5 LR 1 15.0 NB 5 197 0 LT 1 11.0 SB 0 156 30 TR 1 11.0 1/13/1994 11V ID r.. AMLIr ASSOCIATES . INTERSECTION oNlSCAC C EE TOTAL 4 SF -I- [i'T'Ar... 1.8 DRIVEWAY • .r_: /W STREET I \I W __...i..._ 1 : v Srll..!"fH(: F=ITTER PARKWAY N/S STREET NB TOTAL • S(:JU'f FiC':I'r".:N'F ER r-,AF 1:ia(•-1Y N/S-STREET DAVID I. I3(1riI.._1'4 v' ASSOCIATES 1'(..JI<W.I:I_.f-'i DRIVING, RANGE INTERSECTION DRIVEWAY ( SOl_ITI•ICENTI'_= R F'(1Rf(W(1Y C soi. TH(:.'ENITER PARKWAY AY WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1995 C:JitJ)':'I`•I u Nu;.; :C (:-3N r � L...:C. Z [ D -° MAJOR ST R I iE T RUNS NORTH / SOUTH So U N S I G N A L I Z E J) C R I T I C A L G A P S —CRITICAL (:GAPS (SEC)---------- APP LEFT TLJRN THROUGH RIGHT TURN NB 4.60 BIB' V O L U M E A L L O C A T I O N TO L_ a ICI r c LANE 1 LANE 2 LANE 3 APP L_ T' F L_. T 1 =t L. • T ht I\U3 6 :1.90 (:) ±`: i::i • (;;) 0 0 0 S:(: i i 148 31 :I. 0 0 0 0 t'i t :i APP EB NO e U N S t 0 N AL I Z ED LEVEL OF SERVICE is►:E RESERVE CAPACITY LEVEL VE :I•_ IJF SERVICE ro-EsRVE CAPACITY LVEL OF SERVICE NI(-'1J OR ;1" I: i:. F.:..1. . -.. NU / f 3 I...(....::• :I. 995 LANE 2 LANE 3 1/13/1994 DP SC;A(:;C; i. 3 1 1 1 1 DAVID I. HAMi...IN R_: ASSOCIATES 1/1/1994 DF'SC(-lCC 1•'L.IE::WIL._(1 DRIVING RANGE INTERSECTION 1\l DRIVEWAY @ SOUTH:FNTER PARKWAY @ '.. Ol_l'1"I- lC1 d"1' Ire k PARKWAY WEEKDAY PM PEAK 1995 CBD?N L.IhI.;1F lar-iLI!E:D .... MAJOR OR STRE= .F...I.. RUNS NORTH / SOUTH . T R A F F I C & E O n. I W A Y• C O N D T T I O n; GRADE i• °IV (lI:) j . f='I <::L:, L_.lU„ BUSES CONF. PEDS APP (Y) (%) Y /C Ct (Nb) -H- (ped7 /hr) Y/N SEC TYPE _. ; C _ 0 N 0 0 0.90 i 0.0 N I 0 3 h i .at i N i. ' _ ( r} 0 • I'\I 0.0 7. G E O M E T R I C S / V O L U M E S I..JmIE .GROUPS VOLUME 1 "' APP LT -i"l -•I RT I"IVM I....NlS WI•) MVM L.I\IS WA) MVM L.I\IS WD EB .. I 0 5 I.... R :l. 15.0 NB 6 190 0 LT :1. 11.0 'aB t i 148 1 TEi :1. :I .1.. i'! 1/13/1994 27 I, Fj TOTAL DAVID 1: Fi i'IL...:f.l\l & ASsoc ;:1. I'I ::;i :; :I: ITTr :F i;::il=:CT :I; f:ilu • I:i1= St:(aC::;C ": SF. TOTAL... :L79 v 1.48 TMIVEwAY I:: /W STREET. . 190 1 NO, TOTAL: 11.96. • v. •9OL.I'1'•l-•10E.NTER PARKWAY N/8 STREET :1. 3S• 4iiiC:'iE.i'i'i•-IC. ;Ei' N F h; F'' GlF-;KWi"-iY OWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SUBJECT TO THE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE, THE EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE CONTAINED IN SCHEDULE B AND THE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage, not exceeding the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, sustained or incurred by the insured by reason of: 1. Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested other than as stated therein; 2. Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on the title; 3. Unmarketability of the title; 4. Lack of a right of access to and from the land. The Company will also pay the costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defense of the title, as insured, but only to the extent provided in the Conditions and Stipulations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers, the Policy to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company. Attest: Secretary TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By &x..10- President EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improve- ment now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the affect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regula- tions, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the Insured the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that is based on: (a) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or (b) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (i) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or (ii) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. NM1 PA10 ALTA Owner's Policy (10- 17 -92) Form 1190 -4 Face Page ORIGINAL Valid Only If Schedules A and B and Cover Are Attached CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS (c) Whenever the Company shall have brought an action or interposed a defense as required or permitted by the provisions of this policy. the Company may pursue any litigation to final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right. in its sole discretion. to appeal from any adverse judgment or order. (d) In all cases where this policy permits or requires the Company to prosecute or provide for the defense of any action or proceeding, the insured shall secure to the Company the right to so prosecute or provide defense in the action or proceeding, and all appeals therein. and permit the Company to use, at its option. the. name of the insured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the insured. at the Company's expense, shall give thc Company all reasonable aid (1) in any action or proceeding. securing evidence, obtaining witnesses, prosecuting or defending thc action or proceeding, or effecting settlement. and (ii) in any other lawful act which in the opinion of the Company may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest as insured. If thc Company is prejudiced by the failure of the insured to furnish the required cooperation. the Company's obligations to the insured undcr the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation. with regard to the matter or matters requiring such cooperation. S. PROOF OF LOSS OR DAMAGE. In addition to and after the notices required under Section 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations have been provided the Company. a proof of loss or damage signed and sworn to by the insured claimant shall be furnished to the Company within 90 days after the insured claimant shall ascertain the facts giving rise to the loss or damage. The proof of loss or damage shall describe the defect in. or lien or encumbrance on the title. or other matter insured against by this policy which constitutes the basis of loss or damage and shall state. to the extent possible, the basis of calculating the amount of the loss or damage. If the Company is prejudiced by the failure of thc insured claimant to provide the required proof of loss or damage, the Company's obligations to the insured under the policy shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute. or continue any litigation. with regard to the matter or matters requiring such proof of loss or damage. in addition. the insured claimant may reasonably be rcquircd to submit to examination under oath by any authorized representative of the Company and shali produce for examination. inspection and copying, at such reasonable times and places as may be designated by any authorized representative of the Company. all records, books. ledgers. checks. correspondence and memoranda, whether bearing a date before or after Date of Policy. which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. Further, if requested by any authorized representative of the Company , the insured claimant shall grant its permission, in writing, for any authorized representative of the Company to examine , inspect and copy all records. books. ledgers. checks, correspondence and memoranda in the custody or control of a third party. which reasonably pertain to the loss or damage. All information designated as confidential by the insured claimant provided to the Company pursuant to this Section shall not be disclosed to others unless. in the reasonable judgement of the Company. it is necessary in the administration of the claim. Failure of the insured claimant to submit for examination under oath. produce other reasonably requested information or grant permission to secure reasonably necessary information from third parties as required in this paragraph shall terminate any liability of the Company under this policy as to that claim. 6. OPTIONS TO PAY OR OTHERWISE SETTLE CLAIMS; TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. In case of a claim under this policy. the Company shall have the following options: (a)To Pay or Tender Payment of thc Amount of Insurance. To pay or tender payment of the amount of insurance under this policy together with any costs. attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by thc insured claimant. which were authorized by the Company. up to the time of paymant or tender of payment and which the Company is obliga- ted to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of this option. all liability and obligations to the insured under this policy. other than to make the payment required. shall terminate. including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute, or continue any litigation, and the policy shall be surrendered to the Company for cancellation. (h) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other than the Insured or With the Insured Claimant. (i) to pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or in the name of an insured claimant any claim insured against under this policy, together with any costs. attorneys' fees and expenses incurrcd by thc insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay; or (ii) to pay or otherwise settle with the insured claimant the loss or damage provided for under this policy, together with any costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the insured claimant which were authorized by the Company up to the time of payment and which the Company is obligated to pay. Upon the exercise by the Company of either of the options provided for in paragraphs (h)(i) or (ii), the Company's obligations to the insured under this policy for the claimed loss or damage. other than the payments required to be made, shall terminate, including any liability or obligation to defend, prosecute or continue any litigation. 1. DEFINITION OF TERMS. The following terms when used in this policy mean: (a) "insured ": the insured namcd in Schedule A, and. subject to any rights or defenses the Company would have had against the named insured, those who succeed to the interest of the named insured by operation of law as distinguished from purchase including, but not limited to, heirs, distrihutces, devisees, survivors, personal representatives. next of kin. or corporate or fiduciary successors. (b) "insured claimant ": an insured claiming Toss or damage. (c) "knowledge" or "known ": actual knowledge. not constructive knowledge or notice which may he imputed to an insured by reason of the public records as defined in this policy or any other records which impart constructive notice of matters affecting the land. (d) "land ": the land described or referred to in Schedule A, and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property. The term "land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described or referred to in Schedule A. nor any right . title, interest, estate or easement in abutting streets, roads. avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways. but nothing herein shall modify or limit the extent to which a right of access to and from the land is insured by this policy. (e) "mortgage ": mortgage, decd of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. (f) "public records ": records established under state statutes at Date of Policy for thc purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without knowledge. With respect to Section I(a) (iv) of the Exclusions From Coverage, "public records" shall also include environmental protection liens filed in the records of the clerk of the United States district court for the district in which the land is located. (g) "unmarketability of the title ": an alleged or apparent matter affecting the title to the land. not excluded or excepted from coverage, which would entitle a purchaser of the estate or interest described in Schedule A to he released from the obligation to purchase by virtue of a contractual condition requiring the delivery of marketable title. 2. CONTINUATION OF INSURANCE AFTER CONVEYANCE OF TITLE. The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an insured only so long as the insured retains an estate or interest in the land, or holds an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given by a purchaser from the insured, or only so long as the insured shall have liability by reason of covenants of warranty made by the insured in any transfer or conveyance of the estate or interest. This policy shall not continue in force in favor of any purchaser from the insured of either (1) an estate or interest in the land, or (ii) an indebtedness secured by a purchase money mortgage given to the insured. 3. NOTICE OF CLAIM TO BE GIVEN BY INSURED CLAIMANT. The insured shall notify the Company promptly in writing (i) in case of any litigation as set forth in Section 4(a) below. (ii) in case knowledge shall come to an insured hereunder of any claim of title or interest which is adverse to the title to the estate or interest. as insured. and which might cause toss or damage for which the Company may be liable by virtue of this policy, or (iii) if title to the estate or interest. as insured. is rejected as unmarketable. If prompt notice shall not he given to the Company. then as to the insured all liability of the Company shall terminate with regard to the matter or matters for which prompt notice is required: provided, however, that failure to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the rights of any insured under this policy unless the Company shall he prejudiced by thc failure and then only to the extent of the prejudice. 4. DEFENSE AND PROSECUTION OF ACTIONS; DUTY OF INSURED CLAIMANT TO COOPERATE. (a) Upon written request by the insured and subject to the options contained in Section 6 of these Conditions and Stipulations, thc Company. at its own cost and without unreasonable delay. shall provide for the defense of an insured in litigation in which any third party asserts a claim adverse to the title or interest as insured, but only as to those stated causes of action alleging a defect, lien or encumbrance or other matter insured against by this policy. The Company shall have the right to select counsel of its choice (subject to the right of the insured to object for reasonable cause) to represent the insured as to those stated causes of action and shall not be liable for and will not pay the fees of any other counsel. The Company will not pay any fees, costs or expenses incurred by the insured in the defense of those causes of action which allege matters not insured against by this policy. (b) The Company shall have the right, at its own cost. to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or to do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish the title to the estate or interest. as insured, or to prevent or reduce loss or damage to the insured. The Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this policy, whether or not it shall be liable hereunder, and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision of this policy. If the Company shall exercise its rights under this paragraph, it shall do so diligently. B 1190 -4 Conditions and Stipulations, Continued Inside Cover anQ_nL,La Li. 7 Owner's Standard Policy SCHEDULE A Amount of Insurance: $1,000,000.00 Premium: $ 2,320.00 Date of Policy: December 14, 1995 at 3:47 P.M. 1. Name of Insured: Policy No. 862316A USA GOLF PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 2. The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: LEASEHOLD ESTATE 3. The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in: THE NAMED INSURED 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: See "LEGAL DESCRIPTION:" Countersigned: Owner's Standaswd Policy LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Policy No. 862316 A LEASEHOLD ESTATE ARISING OUT OF A MEMORANDUM OF LEASE BETWEEN HERMAN SCHOENBACHLER AND RUTH SCHOENBACHLER, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND ROBERT W. SCHOENBACHLER, A SINGLE MAN, AS LESSOR AND SOUTHCENTER GOLF, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, DATED SEPTEMBER 22, 1994, RECORDED OCTOBER 7, 1994 UNDER RECORDING NO. 9410070088, AS LESSEE, WHOSE INTEREST WAS ASSIGNED TO USA GOLF PARTNERSHIP, A WASHINGTON GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY ASSIGNMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 9512141826, ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 6 IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., LYING WESTERLY OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 540 ( SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY); TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 IN SAID SECTION 35, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT AN IRON PIPE SET AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7 WITH THE WEST LINE OF COUNTY ROAD NO. 76; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 210 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN IRON PIPE AT THE FOOT OF THE HILL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE FOOT OF THE HILL 259 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO AN IRON PIPE IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID COUNTY ROAD NO. 76; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 35, LYING EASTERLY OF THE ORILLIA ROAD EXTENSION, AS ESTABLISHED IN VOLUME 32 OF COMMISSIONERS RECORDS, PAGE 564, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE SOUTH 87 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST -WEST CENTERLINE 960 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 DEGREES 24 MINUTES 59 SECONDS WEST 727.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 04 DEGREES 04 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 87. DEGREES, 56 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS 444 FEET SOUTH AND 571.5 FEET EAST OF THE WEST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE NORTH 85 FEET; Page 2 Owner's Standard Policy THENCE EAST 421 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 246 FEET; THENCE WEST 421 FEET; THENCE NORTH 161 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONDEMNED IN KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO. 590470 FOR PRIMARY STATE HIGHWAY NO. 1; SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Policy No. 862316 Owner's Standard Policy Policy No. 862316 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: STANDARD EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession, or claiming to be in possession, thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey of the land would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for labor, material, services or equipment, or for contributions to employee benefit plans, or liens under Workmen's Compensation Acts, not disclosed by the public records. 6. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including, but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes; or, (d) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), (c) or (d) are shown by the public records. 7. Right of use, control or regulation by the United States of America in the exercise of powers over navigation; any prohibition or limitation on the use, occupancy or improvement of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any waters which may cover the land or to use any portion of the land which is now or may formerly have been covered by water. 8. Any service, installation, connection, maintenance or construction charges for sewer, water, electricity, or garbage collection or disposal, or other utilities unless disclosed as an existing lien by the public records. Page 4 Owner's Standa?d Policy SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS 1. EASEMENT AND THE DISCLOSED BY: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: 2. EASEMENT AND THE GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 3. EASEMENT AND THE GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 4. EASEMENT AND THE DISCLOSED BY: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: 5. EASEMENT AND THE GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: 6. EASEMENT AND THE GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Policy No. 862316 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 1149777 Water line, sewer line and water rights Portion of property herein described TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company Pipeline As now located and staked June 9, 1924 June 25, 1924 1885784 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: King County Drainage ditch Portion as described therein May 4, 1937 June 9, 1947 2950183 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 3019650 Water pipeline The description contained therein is not sufficient to determine its exact location within the property herein described TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission line Portion as described therein August 12, 1947 September 30, 1947 3729002 TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Puget Sound Power & Light Company Electric transmission line Portion as described therein September 12, 1947 September 40, 1947 . 3729005 Page 5 9511300431 City of Tukwila Dcpertment of Public frorks 6300 Southceni r Boulevard, Suite 100 Street Frontal Improvement No- 1.8791 SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY, TUKWILA, TMC 1144.020 reptattes the couttruetioa o! ewttitrner, Dente! impror:;cnts for n:;v or remodeling ordination M'itUt the Poet sues is ineras,:ed by 2041 thermions. repairs. remodeling e>tt;eed» of the previous building vent; 2$,000 111;11= lb i it added Or Cho b ild{r; valve increased by 32$0,000. dc+'eloprricnt meet or exceeds at least one of the TMC ! 1,64.020 Conditions. The pro; sod d :velopmtat property is o'bilteted to psrueip is b+ ft11rd:0$ t l"tte ttoot ►1 ittlprro.enlents, find the e\VI W wsivcs the right to protest %%liter 33 D. or U.L.I.b.1'aanatiOn. The ownet,M;f pay $ propettjerata fair she hued on unit coustructson costs for the frontal imrrvvcments if the City p;oocedswith tem/ use& This orecotettt shall be bindb+j upon the partite. their resp'rctive heir., !alai representatives. t:s :itnecs, transferees and mentors, and rues with the Sand. This wteesrtent shall tc seconded by the City Clatk with the }:ir. County Auditor u reviled byPCW Chaplet 3$.91. wwwd tl,e Ott of .std ra coding will be paid by 'the City. So that the Owner can remove eneurobt'inees tram the prop' sauscd by this requirement, the Corner ear pay the City the Otstntt't pco.rsu sea' are for projected costs, These costs %ill be crude available to the Owner upon wrince merest to the Public Works Dlreetor, Owner tj e.------' /G,‘ ) Owner (signature) 414 CHRIS BENNETT PRESI DENT SOyTHCirNTELcpLF IBC 1C _ Owner-(print nonst) - 8250 165TH AVE N.E. Street Address City q 2ikwila Public Works Director STATE OF WA IATON COUNTY Of _ #200 Dote JUNE 2•�:.��.:�.._.- Dome ._....2062 8$1.794 Phone REDMOND, WA 98052 City, /StetelZiP On this d!' personal! }, appealed betote me C S • HENN , .,...�._, to ens ksoWn ta be the inetivAd ia($) de+iesited in Ind mite enacted the v‘ithitt OM fettegoitt3 iry:trunkeet, and eckatot+•led,t6 t` c t 1te ttttAlity sigma the tam se ltisoher itheir fro and voluntary set sad dcnd, tor the uses and pwprses %hal tin motioned. ,',,....MI.NAv. +�" ul ac;h''s • r IMOli 11) e. t p+t.! :04.1. /4•.vod L' r.c �'1 • :r .ia1 s1 ol.r tn; , ,e h t r, 3i tea MI► ikltEttiD 111014INCI . 1 % ? ;1bPelieto fo: of ohe b!.• Tn-rat P Q7 . Owner's Standard Policy 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: IN FAVOR OF: CONDEMNED IN COUNTY OF: SUPERIOR COURT CAUSE NO.: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: Policy No. 862316 Richard L. Stogsdill and Mary J. Stogsdill, husband and wife King 423664 as disclosed by instrument recorded under Recording No. 4441601 Easement a,,d water rights Portion as described therein 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: DISCLOSED BY: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: Instrument recorded under Recording No. 4791315 Ingress and egress over an existing road 15 feet in width Portion as described therein 9. RELEASE OF DAMAGE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: AND: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Rollin C. Smith White River Power Co. October 15, 1902 December 3, 1902 248281 10. Condemnation of access to State Highway No. 1, and of light, view and air by decree to the State of Washington entered November 28, 1962 as King County Superior Court Cause No. 590470. 11. MATTERS SET FORTH BY SURVEY: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: DISCLOSES: April 29, 1988 8804299007 Possible fence encroachment along Northerly boundary of Parcel A 12. Any questions that may arise relative to the location of the Southcenter Parkway (Anna Mess Rd. #540) referenced in the captioned legal description. 13. Unrecorded leaseholds, if any; rights of vendors and holders of security interests on personal property installed upon said property; and rights of tenants to remove trade fixtures at the expiration of the term. 14. Matters affecting security interests in personal property which may be disclosed by a search of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) records at the Washington State Department of Licensing in Olympia. 15. Street Frontal Improvement No- Protest Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof recorded under Recording No. 9511300431. 16. Compliance with the terms and conditions of the lease shown in Schedule A herein, assigned to and assumed by the Insured by instruments recorded under Recording Nos. 9512141826 and 9512141827. Page 6 Owner's Standard Policy END OF EXCEPTIONS Policy No. 862316 CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 7. DETERMINATION, EXTENT OF LIABILITY AND COINSURANCE. This policy is a contract of indemnity against actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred by the insured claimant who has suffered loss or damage by reason of matters insured against by this policy and only to the extent herein described. (a) The liability of the Company under this policy shall not exceed the least of: (i) the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A; or, (ii) the difference between the value of the insured estate or interest as insured and the value 3f the insured estate or interest subject to the defect, lien or encumbrance insured against by this policy. (b) In the event the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A at the Date of Policy is less than 80 percent of the value of the insured estate or interest or the full consideration paid for the land, whichever is less, or if subsequent to the Date of Policy an improvement is erected on the land which increases the value of the insured estate or interest by at least 20 percent over the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A, then this Policy is subject to the following: (i) where no subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that the amount of insurance at Date of Policy bears to the total value of the insured estate or interest at Date of Policy; or (ii) where a subsequent improvement has been made, as to any partial loss, the Company shall only pay the loss pro rata in the proportion that 120 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A bears to the sum of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A and the amount expended for the improvement. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to costs, attorneys' fees and expenses for which the Company is liable under this policy, and shall only apply to that portion of any loss which exceeds, in the aggregate, 10 percent of the Amount of Insurance stated in Schedule A. (c) The Company will pay only those costs, attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in accordance with Section 4 of these Conditions and Stipulations. 8. APPORTIONMENT. If the land described in Schedule A consists of two or more parcels which are not used as a single site, and a loss is established affecting one or more of the parcels but not all, the Toss shall be computed and settled on a pro rata basis as if the amount of insurance under this policy was divided pro rata as to the value on Date of Policy of each separate parcel to the whole, exclusive of any improvements made subsequent to Date of Policy, unless a liability or value has otherwise been agreed upon as to each parcel by the Company and the insured at the time of the issuance of this policy and shown by an express statement or by an endorsement attached to this policy. 9. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (a) If the Company establishes the title, or removes the alleged defect, . lien or encumbrance, or cures the lack of a right of access to or from the land, or cures the claim of unmarketability of title, all as insured, in a reasonably diligent manner by any method, including litigation and the completion of any appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its obligations with respect to that matter and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. (b) In the event of any litigation, including litigation by the Company or with the Company's consent, the Company shall have no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final determination by a court of competent jurisdiction. and disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title as insured. (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or damage to any insured for liability voluntarily assumed by the insured in settling any claim or suit without the prior written consent of the Company. 10. REDUCTION OF INSURANCE; REDUCTION OR TERMINATION OF LIABILITY. All payments under this policy, except payments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses, shall reduce the amount of the insurance pro tanto. 11. UABIUTY NONCUMULATIVE It is expressly understood that the amount of insurance under this policy shall be reduced by any amount the Company may pay under any policy insuring a mortgage to which exception is taken in Schedule B or to which the insured has agreed, assumed, or taken subject, or which is hereafter executed by an insured and which is a charge or lien on the estate or interest described or referred to In Schedule A, and the amount so paid shall be deemed a payment under this policy to the insured owner. 12. PAYMENT OF LOSS. (a) No payment shall be made without producing this policy for endorsement .of the payment unless the policy has been lost or destroyed, in which case proof of Toss or destruction shall he furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. NM1 PA10 ALTA Owner's Policy (10-17-92) Form 1190 -6 Cover Page (Continued) (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage has been definitely fixed in accordance with these Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be payable within 30 days thereafter. 13. SUBROGATION UPON PAYMENT OR SETTLEMENT. (a) The Company's Right of Subrogation. Whenever the Company shall have settled and paid a claim under this policy, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the insured claimant. The Company shall be subrogatcd to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the insured claimant would have had against any person or property in respect to thc claim had this policy not been issued. If requested by the Company, the insured claimant shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect this right of subrogation. The insured claimant shall permit the Company to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Insured claimant and to use the name of thc insured claimant in any transaction or litigation involving these rights or remedies. If a payment on account of a claim does not fully cover the loss of the insured claimant, the Company shall be subrogated to these rights and remedies in the proportion which the Company's payment bears to the whole amount of the loss. If loss should result from any act of the insured claimant, as stated above. that act shall not void this policy, but the Company, in that event, shall be required to pay only that part of any losses insured against by this policy which shall exceed the amount, if any, lost to the Company by reason of the impairment by the insured claimant of the Company's right of subrogation. (b) The Company's Rights Against Non - insured Obligors. The Company's right of subrogation against non - insured obligors shall exist and shall include, without limitation, the rights of the insured to indemnities, guaranties, other policies of insurance or bonds, notwithstanding any terms or conditions contained in those instruments which provide for subrogation rights by reason of this policy. 14. ARBITRATION Unless prohibited by applicable law. either the Company or the insured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. Arbitrable matters may include. but are not limited to, any controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is 51,000.000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the insured. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is in excess of $1,000,000 shall be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company and the insured. Arbitration pursuant to this policy and under the Rules in effect on the date the demand for arbitration is made or, at the option of the insured, the Rules in effect at Date of Policy shall be binding upon the parties. The award may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state in which the land is located permit a court to award attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The law of the situs of the land shall apply to an arbitration under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from the Company upon request. 15. LIABILITY LIMITED TO THIS POLICY; POLICY ENTIRE CONTRACT. (a) This policy together with all endorsements, if any, attached hereto by the Company is the entire policy and contract between thc insured and the Company. In interpreting any provision of this policy, this policy shall be construed as a whole. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest covered hereby or by any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to this policy. (c) No amendment of or endorsement to this policy can be made except by a writing endorsed hereon or attached hereto signed by either the President. a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of the Company. 16. SEVERABILITY. In the event any provision of the policy is held invalid or unenforceable under applicable law, the policy shall be deemed not to include that provi- sion and all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 17. NOTICES, WHERE SENT. All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be fumished the Company shall include the number of this policy and shall be addressed to Transamerica Title Insurance Company, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 3450, San Francisco, Califomia 94104; ORIGINAL Valid Only If Face Page, Schedules A and B Are Attached 9. American Land Title Association Owner's Policy (10- 17 -92) POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE Transamerica Tine Insurance Com- pany has become of domestic State Hof Arizona as of November 1, 1994 with Administrative Offices at 8. Penn Center, Philadelphia PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 241 -6000 Issued by TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HOME OFFICE 44 Montgomery Street Suite 3450 San Francisco, CA 94104 B 1190 -6