HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L94-0096 - UNITED PARCEL SERVICE (UPS) - LOADING FACILITY SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTL94 -0096
550 ANDOVER PARK W.
UPS AIR RECOVERY
FACILITY
SEPA
CITY OF TUKWILA
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
CONSTRUCTION OF 1,223 S.F. LOAD /UNLOAD FACILITY
PROPONENT: DAVID KEHLE, ARCHITECT.`
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, 'INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, "IF °:ANY:
ADDRESS: 550 .`ANDOVER PK W
PARCEL NO: _262304 -9015
SEC /TWN /RNG: , 3/26/23`
LEAD AGENCY: CITY. OF TUKWILA t' !' FILE N4:::L94- Oq9'6
The City has determined that.the\proposal does not havea'probab1e
significant adverse impact ``. on the e,nvi ronment. An
environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)'(c)'.,
This decision was made after review of a• completed environmental
checklist and other information on tile..' with the lead agency: This,
information is available to the public on request.
******************* * * * * * * * * * * * */i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *• k* * ** * * *•k * * ** * * *; *. *:k * *'k **
This etermination is final and signed this
199
day of
. Ric Beeler, Responsible Official,'
City of Tukwila, (206) 431 -3680
6300 Southcenter Boulevard
Tukwila, WA 98188
You may appeal this determination to the City Clerk at Ci:.Gy:Ha11, 6200
Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, '; WA ... 98188; no later thaniO days from the
above signature date by written appeal stat-.ing the_.•b`as:is' of the appeal for
specific factual objections. You may b'e requi.re.d:to` bear some of the
expenses for an appeal.
Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City
Clerk and Department of Community Development.
A F F I D A V I T
O Notice of Public Hearing
fl Notice of Public Meeting
OBoard of Adjustment Agenda
Packet
fl Board of Appeals Agenda
Packet
O Planning Commission Agenda
Packet
fl Short Subdivision Agenda
Packet
O F D I S T R I B U T I O N
hereby declare that:
O Notice of Application for
Shoreline, Management Permit
O Shoreline Management Permit
Determination of Non -
ignificance
fl Mitigated Determination of
Nonsignificance
O Determination of Significance
and Scoping Notice
❑ Notice of Action
0 Official Notice
Other
0 Other'
was mailed to each of the following addresses on /2- T
FRAfrd yoa-A-Lt rov fut,i,oie,(A.4-cok-, 00 n - 99
1 pGw! D't (zaLa,
Dot-
Name of Project145 l Signature
File Number L9q1 —db01 (� t
TO: Jack Pace
FROM: John Jimers
RE: SEPA - United 'Parcel Service
DATE: December 15, 1995
Memorandum
D
Project File No. L94 -0096
Project Description:
The site is located at 550 Andover Park West and is zoned C -M
(Industrial Park). The proposal is to construct a 1,233 s.f.
building for loading and unloading packages to replace an existing
outdoor facility at the same location. The building will be 75
feet south of the principal building, centered within a paved
trailer storage area.
Summary of Impacts:
The project is small in scale and is not likely to result in
significant adverse impacts. The use of the site will not change.
Improvements will include the small building and landscape planters
with fence intended to screen the facility and the existing trailer
storage area. A small landscape planter will be removed. There
will be no additional traffic generated and the new building will
not adversely affect the flow of traffic on Andover Park West.
There are no environmentally sensitive areas on or near the site.
The building will be substantially smaller than the principal
building, and will be constructed with cement composite boards
painted to match the existing UPS /Roffe building.
Summary of Proposed Mitigation:
New landscaping and fences will reduce visual impacts of loading
and storage.
Comments Received From Reviewing Departments:
Public Works has no comments. The Fire Department notes a fire
alarm system will be required in the new structure. This
requirement can be implemented through the building permit process
rather than SEPA.
Agencies With Jurisdiction:
No other agencies with jurisdiction have been identified.
Recommended Threshold Determination:
DNS.
August 24, 1994
David Kehle, Architect
12878 Interurban Ave. So.
Seattle, WA 98168
Dear Dave,
As we discussed over the phone yesterday, this Air Recovery Unit
will not affect the number of employees or the traffic volume at
our building. The building will provide an enclosed area to
sort /gather the Next Day Air parcels. Previously this operation
has been done in the open lot exposed to the elements.
The current operation consists of 65 drivers who arrive at work
between 7:30 and 8:00 a.m. in their personal vehicles. From 8:05
a.m. to 8:30 a.m. these drivers leave the building in UPS package
cars. The building is practically deserted until 5:15 p.m. when
46 sorters commence work. They finish at 8:20 p.m. During the
sort the drivers return to the building with the majority of the
drivers arriving from 5:45 to 6:15 p.m. By 6:15 all of the air
parcels have been sorted and are headed to the airport.
The trailers are moved between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. There
are about 16 trailers that are cycled through the building daily,
with 70% of the movement occurring between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00
a.m.
At 4:00 a.m. our pre -load sort starts up, requiring 55 employees.
This sort is finished at 8:00 a.m.
Summarizing our traffic flow in a chronological order is as
follows:
12:00 a.m. - 4:00 a.m. 8 Trailers Arrive
4:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. 55 Sorters Arrive to work &
8 Trailers Arrive
8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. 55 Sorters Leave &
65 Drivers Arrive & Leave
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. 237 Customers
5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. 65 Drivers Return &
46 Sorters Arrive to Work
9:00 p.m. 46 Sorters Depart
16 Trailers Leave
9:00 p.m - 12:00 a.m. 0 Minimal Activity
Sincerely,
PDP A :JB1AUG24
John argero
Project Engineer
Cona-1 No.
Y.:S
Epic File No. L17"112)
.Fee $ 325 Receipt No.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:U (' -AM WAT=r4
2. Name of applicant:UR7 47/r) I �F{�F� X21 >H►h
3. Address and yphon�e number �o�f, applicant and contact person/: F Y 17 -k'/„
11;;I:7-7 IhrtL-)4,11 b' i Y /t1.,, , }J F % IJ,� /% I%/ Icn l ,
I
4. Date checklist prepared: (p1�6- 1.1/1
5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
lI
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
f• -
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will
be prepared, !directly related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,
explain. Flo
10. LisshtY�any government approvals or,p`ermits that will be needed for your proposal.
_ : LP11 L.1 I
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses
and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not
need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete
description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be
summarized ll� IIhheIIren ,{ ''II I ,
(' t'-'17:116,t• 1,1 N O.. rte• �Ir bt' aJ l,,i -,- 1.1r- 1i {�...rL (.. j, I,': �lir U �6 }�U �G1 �'/. ���� _ 1
iv / l( G 1 .17/ rt!4!
La/ !0A;5 -� y'�' ') r;, J�(u. ,.::216(,5 6l ! �''I ''=� a ; L �it,' u•ry' , 1t'" �'i;,C�'' r=�
Ino rf (r7 ; k9pni . 'di- Hir.)Ur.+;: Ir.- LL;' 1 ;! j (l)'!>> :i k.r• Vi "l .ip-'`fir
/11• lV -; V'
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand
the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over
a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal
description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably
available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica-
tions related to this checklist.
G%G kW M51 .1 V!c. \yl � j� btLY&Litt e!ve ,I I u;ou
13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land
Use Policy P1 n Map as environmentally sensitive?
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC'7
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one):
rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate
percent slope)? '
c. What general types of soils are found on the site
(for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If
you know the classification of agricultural soils,
sp cify them and note any prime farmland.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable
soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti
ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate
soyrce of f ' 11. 'G4)L4/W i•: j!•114 h 64
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,
construction, or use? If so, .generally describe.
L L 1 * - ‘1.5; ' RJU7 f P /G"JEt'i6i1 (-,
g.
About what percent of the site will be covered with
impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
�h
1-Yos. W It/44e0V a64 -,{' Uri
-i-�'' 7'
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or
other impacts to the earth, if any:
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from
the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors,
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when
the project is completed? If any, generally
describe and give approximate quantities if known.
a: a �;. n1 +
/171 t "r•� i1 /. -- �- ��.1�!-I.�- ���i�: IVU�Li�r:c, P�i�r,- ,�`I��'1�L�Ot i
01- UQ1 ' M(I Iii r' `W I� ^(,I{i �^� Htt t
tt
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor
that may affect your proposal? If so, generally
describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or
other impacts to air, if any:
kale. ' . of (r,Uj2
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the
immediate vicinity of the site (including year -
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state what
stream or river it flows into.
k'
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
.2) Will the project require any work over, in, or
adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach
available plans,.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material
that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the
site that would' be affected. Indicate the
source of fill material.
4) Will the proposal require surface water
withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
67
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year
floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of
waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated
volume of discharge.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Ground:
1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be
discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quan-
tities, if known.
2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged
into the ground from septic tanks or other sour-
ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following
chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the
general size of the system, the number of such
systems, the number of houses to be served (if
applicable), or the number of animals or humans
the system(s) are expected to serve.
c. Water Runoff (including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm
water) and method of collection and disposal, if
any (include quantities, if known). Where will
this water flow? Will this water flow into
other wat rs? If so, describe.
N o) EI !cid riztS
Ll Ir (di} iJ 1►i? .`!14...x14: ' ‹f .
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
• 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface
waters? If so, generally describe.
Flo fir -r.:!6 Li: it C-' &Frl:ri ''t %
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface,
ground, and runoff water 'mpacts, if any:
ri�r !r L-5`'!1( • U!, -''i' [1.4•,::11(i-r, Iteaa.\i t7U( -7
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the
site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple„-aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cep r pine, other
�
( shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush,
skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed
or altered? ')J1 FC 2lE.l•e16NIV7 ;!. ►.
"7 4 "17::6; f (__61trtl .
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on
or near the site.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
'measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the
site, if any: rg;> )! C'rf'- 4i.:Cc:00!; 1,b `r
7z7sr orr P 1^L(4 dr !r (ire' :gpx, Nc
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been
observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds,!other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish,
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to
be on or near th site.
H
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,
explain. N!-
d. Proposed measurgs to preserve or enhance wildlife,
if any: N h!P, ( -6■4Ce E►j
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric., natural gas,• oil,
wood stove, solor) wi TI1 -- be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether
it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar
energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features' are
included in the plans of this proposal? List other
proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts, if any: /1�l LtI1 r I
rl '� 4!%1 J ✓ �' ! �'.J , ' li V, II2 rrp IJ U.�• l.if,. 1. ] rte' li
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards,
including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe. �p
1) Describe special emergency services that might
be required. ' f ��{`,-•
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ-
mental health hazards, if any:
b. Noise
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may
affect your project (for example: traffic,
equipment, operation, qther)?
2) What types and levels of noise would be created
by or associated with the project on a short -
term or a long -term basis (for example: traf-
fic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate
what hours noise would come from the site.
It 1 COI !�i rJ. ifmr • ;'G:1^; •;,i h�r:�M;3'
V I r.: 1611ii - kit) 1,106 ('rc,91.i
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise
impacts, if any: •{;1
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent
properties? I-- _
( r 1 N G,'i, -- fir' Lt€• 11 ti u ‘?IbGtc Ir)
- NorA
.
b. Has the site been used for agriculture?. If so,
describe. k7
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will any •structures be demolished?
Iff so, what?
e. What is the current zoning classification of the
site? k.w1;4 rL
•
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation
of the site? 6A 111 =!i {rl�
g.
If applicable, what is the current shoreline master
program designation of the site?
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an
"environmentally, sensitive" area? If so, specify.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work
in the completed project? 1.-b 611,)11(
j. Approximately how many people would the completed
project displace? �(�I•!G
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement
impacts, if any: 4f7-;
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com-
patible with existing and projected land uses and
plans, if any: LJ V2 '11...1.m.-1.0 'f1i1 1Obj2I c- Lir
1.1'.:11)t poi I1E.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if
any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income
housing?
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli-
minated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low -
income housing.
9 •
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing
impacts, if any: i's-
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed
structure(s), not including antennas; what is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
Get4), )3N-ti;'.'". 1.6 U GO
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be
altered or obstructed?
Jr-
k1
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic
impacts, if any: tic-',• _, `f G t Y,J �:T' /;ii'',!( , ; `(,, 1
'c li ! / ,},
, i . ri bm UJ1).1_, 'P..
-13-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal
produc ? What time of day would it mainly occur?
'IeI : vC)tJ -4
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a
safety hazard or interfere with views?
c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may
affect your proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and
glare im acts, if any:
1401ir PorY1111250
12. Recreation
a. What designed and informal recreational oppor-
tunities are in the immediate vicinity?
rFic,ii Y/ i �!�' ?~'t1'� tf �: ^' / /al ti%:+r''1r (
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing
recreational uses? If so, describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on
recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the pro ect or applicant, if any:
-14-
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro-
posed for, national, state, or local preservation
registers known to be on or next to the site? If
so, generally describe.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of
historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural
importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to educe or control impacts, if
any:
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the
site, and describe proposed accss to the existing
street system. Show pn site Tans, if any.
Ftoi'D�'�%
b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If
not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest
transit stop? (.1I! !);1j!
c. How many parking spaces would the. completed project
ave? How many wnould the projec eliminate?
✓ i7.i (1V4i ,d ')/1 , :I.-( F;PX.' .14 V.` • 0;71157
(✓' ✓!,l��i.l.'"'3�.,
i i-.. ;
•
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets,
or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate
vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If
so, generally describe.
f. -How many vehicular trips per day would be generated
by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak m�woJuldnocWur.
rairm gio.. ii %i1...
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor-
tation impl a ts, if any:
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for
public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If
so, generally describe.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct
impacts on pNplic services, if any.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available .at— the- - site•
e12`ctricity, natural" gas;: ter refuse service
~ t 1 hone,-. san fa'ry - sewer; .septic sys r,— �tYier.
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the
project, the utility providing the service, and the
general construction activities on the site or in
the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
15L t2c4H- ir,' 4
C. Signature
The above answers are true and complete to the best of
my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is
relying on them to make • s-d cision.
Signature:
Date Submitted: 1D1 * 4 4-
PLEASE CONTINUE TO THE NEXT PAGE.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC."'T Evaluation for
. Agency Use Only
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful
to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of
the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the
proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from
the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity
or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple-
mented. Respond briefly and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge
to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production
of noise?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. Now would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani-
mals, fish, or marine life are:
-18-
f'f�
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or
natural resources?
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and
natural resourses are:
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect
environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or
eligible or under study) for governmental protection;
such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers,
threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime
farmlands?
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid
or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and •
shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or
encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land
use impacts area:
How does the proposal conform to the Tukwila Shoreline
Master Plan?
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on
• transportation or public services and utilities?
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)
are:
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict
with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for
the p- rotection of the environment.
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
8. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
cies of the Plan?
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC( 'T
E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT
PROPOSALS
The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the
objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the
aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This
information provides a general overall perspective of the
proposed action in the context of the environmental infor-
mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor-
tive information, studies, etc.
1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal?
C1') -tn : ;' f i ' �.I� -,�'i r1C� Fes/ 7 �'. ;i I IQ r4171 , D!%P1 I
ir!t!a'
LLr, i4-1' It' 11J
SIC Ix -� k( —hv- - ro(!(;y,o;.';'.!y
-T(tr'') I tom! i r.- rf t';;!;,'r.3, 6r:qr.
kirrYI'1fr- up ID erxt,,ai
` -1 I ; –"f!L EI'.l ry1(.1. 1,1(76
2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these
objvtives?
a) lr ':),;'I'11-'!!'.%')1 •( t),I b} 4 C- 1�.1r,. hl1 (:IS'�"r�� 150,! „r Hrj.
�i- ►; �T. �, t�� .7 . • .. 10' I 1J -r'.
iii.'
?iii 1
!I
...P• • I fir.
'1-.
%F.
J1;'QI!J) II1't
r.
• �I �” 9&(,,,,;..
Vo .1 ,r-r 7N it i , v 1 yr It - ! '
a h [-;C ;V;raSJ �'rtr . /r' re, )..r 9 1
�r-
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only
11;C-
it }'It4,111
.IS �!Ir�..,•' I'1) 1'1••
I ' f r
I
3. Please- compare the alternative means and indicate the
preferred course of action:
i(.0� l `t-.C. 'in 1- 50= 1,
' 4 !I! 11' I�7 G'�:�'` -1 �'.Il�cr
U ! : • t' -
4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila
Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what poli-
ie of the Plan? kb I V .!ir- '%-
trIlligaa laNAFEINEr
05 'tt.' -of �i`t�' W ItV- fr;pr Ott
(/"' E I :•,14, 1'2 lr ei ritbr •
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s)
are:
-23- •
Evaluation for
Agency Use Only