Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPermit L93-0088 - REED REINVALD ARCHITECTS - FOSTER LIBRARY DESIGN REVIEWl93-0088 4060 south 144th street foster library City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director NOTICE OF DECISION V I A T E L E FAX: 572 -1445 June 28, 1994 Mr. Ilmar Reinvald ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD 201 I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila Dear Mr. Reinvald: This is to confirm that the Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved the four proposals for the Foster Library project as presented on June 23, 1994, with the conditions and modifications listed below. A. Special Permission Parking #L94 -0037 The Planning Commission adopted the findings and conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated 6/15/94, with the following modification: The provision of 34 parking stalls is approved, with an allowance for a reduction in this number to the degree necessary to protect the large elm tree. B. Conditional Use Permit #L93 -0089 The Planning Commission adopted the findings and conclusions contained in the Staff Report dated 6/15/94, and approved the Conditional Use Permit as proposed. C. Design Review #L93 -0088 The Board of Architectural Review approved the project as presented in the Staff Report (6/15/94) and public hearing (6/23/94), including the revised entry plans submitted at the hearing, with the following conditions: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Foster Library Notice of Decision for 6/23/94 Page 2 Landscape & Site Treatment: 1. A traffic warning device, such as traffic buttons or speed bumps, shall be used at each entry drive, located an adequate distance from the crosswalk to provide early warning. 2. The entry area shall re- designed to complement the portico and better relate to the building and other site features. The applicant shall consider: a. Changing the shape of entry plaza; b. Enlarging the size of entry plaza; c. Adjusting grades of planters; and d. Using contrasting materials or colors in paving and walls. 3. The sitting wall shall be refined to ensure an appealing and functional seating area, with an appropriate height and a cap wide enough for sitting. 4. The entry plaza /walk shall be re- designed to incorporate convenient barrier -free access, which is architecturally integrated with the entry plaza. 5. The west and north perimeter of the site shall have a solid fence of decorative material and quality construction and /or opaque landscape screening. Chain link or unadorned board fencing is not acceptable. 6. The landscape plan shall be revised to clarify which plant species will be used in which locations and re- submitted for approval. Selected plants shall be biologically and aesthetically-appropriate for their chosen location. 7. The applicant shall ensure that the large elm to be retained is adequately protected, and shall enlarge the planter around the elm as necessary to protect it. Foster Library Notice of Decision for 6/23/94 Page 3 8. The dumpster /transformer area wall and landscaping shall be designed to provide for both screening and for employee safety, and shall include adequate lighting. 9. The street light located in the middle of the entry walk shall be relocated to so as not to interfere with pedestrians crossing the street or entering the building. 10. The biofiltration swale sign shall be relocated for better visibility by library patrons. 11. All areas, including street planting strips, shall have automatic irrigation, with irrigation plans submitted with building permit applications. 12. A site lighting plan shall be submitted for approval, which provides safe, attractive, pedestrian -scale lighting for walkways, and which complements landscaping. Plan shall include details of standards and fixtures. Building Design: 13. The building design shall be revised to provide better detailing and internal consistency between architectural elements. The applicant shall consider: a. Defining window shapes with heavier frames or mullions /muntins: b. Framing medallions; c. Enlarging and covering downspouts to appear as columns pilasters /columns; d. Use of accent colors in downspouts and columns; e. Wrapping the base of the building around the downspouts. f. Changes in the size and shape of the large windows at the north and SE corner, and relationship to other windows; g. Extending the north window to the building base (like the SE window); h. Repetition of medallion pattern on other facades; Foster Library Notice of Decision for 6/23/94 Page 4 i. Consistent use of medallions on all facades; and j. Adding downspouts or columns on the north or south facades. 14. The entry portico shall be re- designed to provide sufficient visual weight, architectural interest and detailing appropriate to an important public entrance. The applicant shall consider: a. Enlarging the portico to the west, to the edge of the sidewalk; b. Enlarging the portico to the south, to the edge of the steps and planters; and c. Refining support columns to be more similar to each other, the downspouts, and to other vertical elements of the building. 15. The cornice shall be re- designed so that it is well- integrated with each facade, has an appropriate scale for the building, and has a balanced relationship with other architectural elements. The applicant shall consider: a. Extending the cornice around the entire building; b. Reducing the thickness or number of layers in the cornice; c. Strengthening related vertical elements (downspouts or columns); and d. Providing a finished edge where the cornice meets other planes and elements. 16. An architectural lighting plan shall be prepared which complements building architecture and details, with minimal impacts to adjacent residential areas. a. The applicant shall consider using lighting to highlight "medallions," columns or the cornice. Foster Library Notice of Decision for 6/23/94 Page 5 Street Furniture and Site Details: 17. Plans shall be revised to include bike racks; plans shall also include other street furniture (e.g. trash receptacles, etc.) which is appropriate to a public facility and integrated with the overall architectural concept. 18. Revised drawings which implement Conditions #3, 4 and 5 (entry area), and Conditions #14, 15, 16 and 17 (building design) shall be approved by the Board of Architectural Review at a future public meeting. All other conditions above shall be implemented through revised drawings to be approved by the Director of the Department of Community Development. D. Special Permission Sign #L94 -0041 The Planning Commission approved proposed signs, with the following condition: Proposed signs shall meet the applicable standards specified in the Tukwila Sign Code; and plans shall be revised to ensure that sign design is consistent with the building's architectural theme, and shall include details on size, materials, colors and illumination. Revised drawings which implement these conditions shall be submitted for approval by the Director of the Department of Community Development. The revisions required to meet the above conditions shall be included in the final building permit drawings. After these revised drawings are approved, minor, incidental changes may be administratively approved by the Director of Community Development. However, please note that any significant changes will require further review and approval by the BAR. The decision of the Planning Commission and BAR is not final until the appeal period has elapsed, which is ten calendar days after the above date of decision. Appeals must be filed in writing to the City Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the final day of the appeal period. Where the final day of an appeal period falls on a weekend or holiday the appeal period will be extended to 5:00 pm. on the next work day. For the Foster Library decision, any appeal must be filed by July 5, 1994. Foster Library Notice of Decision for 6/23/94 Page 6 If you have any questions regarding these Planning Commission or BAR decisions, please let me know (431- 3670). When you have had a chance to review these conditions again, please contact me to arrange a meeting to discuss revisions and scheduling. Sincerel Ann Siege• haler Associate Planner cc: File TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT , (JUN 28 '94 03 :08PM) TULLA DCD /PW (AUTO) THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 009 TRANSMISSION 9 *- 12065721445 06 OK ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER. 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION d I ka �� 1908 10 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor :-mss Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 25, 1994 Mr. Haggerton called the Board of Architectural Review public meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. Members present were Messrs. Haggerton, Malina, Meryhew, Clark, Neiss and Mrs. Stetson. Mr. Flesher was absent. Representing the staff were Jack Pace and Sylvia Schnug. There were no citizens' comments. GRANT NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF JUNE 23, JULY 28, AND AUGUST 4,1994. MR. MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Haggerton and Mr. Malina excused themselves from hearing the Foster Library project because they did not attend the original public hearing for the Library. Mr. Clark took over as Chairman. Jack Pace presented the staff report and entered into the record the supplemental staff report dated 8- 22 -94. At the public hearing in June, this project was approved with conditions. The Board asked that some of those conditions come back before them for review for compliance. The purpose of this meeting is not to develop new conditions, or redraft conditions, but to review how well the applicant has complied with the conditions. Mr. Pace referred to the new color board. There are some differences between the applicant and staff regarding the refinements. The first condition refers to the window facing the north elevation. This windows is not consistent in design with the other windows. Staff is also asking that the applicant either make the gap between the cornices wider or get rid of all together, because it does not serve a function. Staff is concerned with the cornice which comes out only a small amount and does not connect with anything. Staff is also suggesting to extend the 3 tiers of the cornice to its junction with the facade to provide a more refined edge. Another issue deals with the medallions. Staff is suggesting that medallions to the other facade. Staff is also suggesting that the stepping method be continued on the window treatment. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 Planning Commission/BAR August 25, 1994 Minutes Page 2 Scott Waytashek, representative for the applicant: He noted that they have concerns with the six conditions indicated by staff. At this point, the staff is looking for consistency. The issue with the mullion spacing from side of the building to the other, at the north elevation, to arbitrarily break up the window so it matches the other mullion spacing would interfere with the view they've tried to create on the site plan. The issues with the cornice, the cornice occurs where there are windows. To extend it around the building or to step it back would change the vocabulary quite significantly. They've tried to create a simple, dignified building, which has some timeless characteristics. By stepping the cornices back, it would start to evoke strong images of classical architecture. They have increased the width of the cornice from last time. They have also prepared a new color board and the brick has gone to a more common red brick color than the actual sample was the last time. Mr. Meryhew asked about the medallions. Mr. Waytashek said that when the elevations were redesigned on the other side to deal with the downspouts, the medallion became a left over and they felt they were no longer needed. Also, the cost of the medallions is of some concern to the King County Library System. Mr. Meryhew asked what the total quantity of the medallions is. Mr. Waytashek said there are a total of five. Mr. Clark asked the cost of the medallion Mr. Waytashek said he did not have that costs, but the of the building is $850,000. Mr. Waytashek continued by addressing the issues which staff and the applicant have agreed upon since the last meeting. Mr. Meryhew asked for clarification on the windows. Mr. Waytashek addressed that by referring to the drawings. Mr. Meryhew asked if they could remove a little glass to make them look more similar. Mr. Waytashek said they could probably agree to that. Mrs. Stetson said that she had a problem with the gap in the cornice. Mr. Waytashek said that the gap accentuates a vertical aspect of this progression, as a Planning Comrnission/BAR August 25, 1994 Minutes Page 3 reflection on the outside of what is happening on the inside of the building. Mr. Neiss asked how wide the gap is. Mr. Waytashek said it is approximately 12 " -18 ". Mr. Neiss asked how deep the cornice is in the area of the gap. Mr. Waytashek said it is approximately 2 feet. Mr. Clark said that he liked the ceiling the way it was previously. Mr. Waytashek said that in working with staff they had to straighten the detail on the ceiling. During staff's rebuttal, Mr. Pace re- addressed the issues stated in his opening remarks. Mr. Clark closed the public meeting. Mr. Neiss said that he has a problem with the gap in the cornice. He said that he didn't have any strong feelings about extending the cornice around the corner of the building. Mr. Meryhew said that he didn't like the gap either. He said that he does have a problem with the windows as they are shown. He said that he would like to see the windows on the north and west elevations to be similar in appearance and shape. Mr. Clark said the mullion shape should be the same on both windows. Mr. Meryhew said he did not have a problem with the cornices not wrapping around. Mr. Clark agreed. Mrs. Stetson said she would like to see those two windows relate to each other better and to close the gap in the cornice. Mr. Meryhew said he didn't agree with the staff's suggestion to add medallions on the other facade. The other Board members agreed. Mr. Meryhew said they should make a recommendation that those medallions be coordinated with review by the City's Arts Commission. Planning Commission/BAR August 25, 1994 Minutes Page 4 MR. MERYHEW MOVED THAT L93 -0088, THE FOSTER LIBRARY DESIGN REVIEW BE APPROVED BASED ON STAFF'S FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON ITEM a.; OMIT ITEM b. OF THE STAFF REPORT, DO AGREE WITH ITEM c. OF THE STAFF REPORT; OMIT ITEMS d, e, AND f., OF THE STAFF REPORT; AND THAT A CONDITION BE ADDED WHICH HAS THE MEDALLION DESIGN BE COORDINATED WITEI THE TUKWILA ARTS COMMISSION BEFORE FINAL SELECTION. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Clark adjourned the public meeting. Prepared By, Sylvia Schnug piri 1908 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director PLANNING COMMISSIONBOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW MINUTES JUNE 23, 1994 (Adopted August 25, 1994) Mr. Clark called the meeting to order at 7:OOp.m. Members present were Messrs. Clark, Meryhew, Neiss and Ms. Stetson. Messrs. Haggerton, Flesher and Malina were excused. Representing the staff were Jack Pace, Denni Shefrin, Ann Siegenthaler and Sylvia Schnug Case #L94 -0012 I. Attached vs. Detach Units in Single Family Zones Denni Shefrin gave the staff report. There are two issues with this first provision. PRD units need to be harmonious with the surrounding residential developments. Secondly, single family units which are detached are more preferable than those which are attached. It also references zero -lot -line development. At a typical zero -lot -line set -up you are actually having detached units but they are built on the property line on alternating lot lines. It would be false to assume that the zero -lot -line patterns automatically means they're attached. The Council's direction is whether or not to approve attached units in single family zones. Mr. Meryhew: This applies only to the PRD section, correct? Ms. Shefrin: Yes. With one exception, there is one provision that talks about change to the sensitive area regulations. Mr. Clark: Could you not find any examples for the Council of a positive impact from attached PRD housing? To my perspective that is an example of the negative impact of detached zero -lot- line construction. You could meet the letter of it without the intent of it being harmonious. Ms. Shefrin: pattern. You are bringing up a good point. This attempts to straighten out zero -lot -line Mr. Meryhew: I don't like the restriction either. I'm not sure that down the road we want to limit it to single family. Ms. Shefrin: The bottom line here, when we're talking about PRD's, something that's created, it sets in motion the whole desire to try and retain unique geographic features. Mr. Clark: I think the only people who are embracing the clustering concept are those who are forced to focus on it. If you ask the general public we'd get a negative response. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 Planning Commission /BEAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 2 ?: They are thinking about their immediate neighborhood, they're not thinking about the overall city. Ms. Stetson: What's wrong with attached? What's the difference between attached and duplex for instance? This is not an example of detached zero -lot -line, this is appalling. Ms. Shefrin: Do you feel that the language in the PRD is strong enough, are there other sorts of objectives that are part of the PRD provision to get good design, to allow the kind of flexibility that we're talking about? Mr. Clark: I think that a tighter review of the architectural detailing of the product would achieve a better result than this restriction. Ms. Shefrin: The PRD allows that sort of critique as well. The BAR criteria is more specific to commercial development. Mr. Neiss: I think we need some flexibility. If you had the two attached on one lot line it gives you a lot more room to do something creative with the surrounding area. Mr. Clark: And preserve native vegetation. ?: I like the the way the code reads without the changes. Ms. Shefrin: The way the code currently reads it doesn't require BAR review, but it does require BAR guidelines be applied to the project. Mr. Clark: The problem with viewing the PRD from the perspective of clustering is that if the citizen's and the council don't see the value of clustering, what's the point of having that as a goal? Is that the goal of the PRD? Ms. Shefrin: Ultimately it is. Mr. Pace: If you want to leave the wording as is, just strengthen the BAR guidelines. Mr. Clark: Remember that if the overall goal is clustering, then the existing language achieves a better result than the new proposed language. II. Minimum Property Size Second issue relates to minimum property size. In the Code PRD's are limited to one acre or greater. The SAO requires that short plats and boundary line adjustments also meet administrative PRD. This whole issue pertains to areas where there are sensitive areas. ?: I agree with the Council on this one to just delete it. Planning Commission/BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 3 III. Density and Minimum Lot Size The PRD allows a density transfer. Density transfer says that if you have sensitive areas .on your property the provision does not penalize for maximizing development. You have to recognize that sensitive areas says you can't build in those areas and you have to provide a buffer. The direction that Council gave was to omit the density transfer calculation all together and regulate minimum lot size. They suggested a 15% reduction to lot areas and setbacks with a minimum lot size of 6,120 square feet in area. The Tukwila Tomorrow Committee is recommending minimum lot sizes of 6,500 square feet in residential zones in lieu of 7,200. Ms. Shefrin: So, do we look at regulating lot size and allow some variety or variance of setbacks to accomplish the goal of preserving the sensitive areas and open spaces? Mr. Neiss: I think there should be a minimum lot size, whether it's 15% or an actual square footage. Mr. Meryhew: I agree there should be a limit, it could be as small as 5,000 square feet. Mr. Clark: If you have a high density, 5,000 square feet can look very big. That can support a lot of design options, but I don't think we should go below 5,000. Mr. Neiss: I'm not in total agreement with the idea of 5,000 square foot lots, but I stand alone on that one. Ms. Shefrin: If we start limiting lot areas there has to be some demonstration that a site can support "X" number of lots with that minimum area. Mr. Pace: As lot size gets larger, density transfer doesn't work. ?: The important thing is that we want to minimize the number of 5,000 square foot lots. We want to vary them, try to go as large as possible, but in some cases we might want it to be 5,000 square feet. Ms. Shefrin: The other option would be to leave density transfer in there and have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. IV. Density Transfer to Developable Parts Of The Site The Code states that no development is allowed in sensitive areas. The conflict is that this provision excludes density transfer and the SAO says you can't develop on steep slopes, how do we resolve that issue? The recommendation is that the development be confined to developable portions in accordance with Chapter 18.45 of zoning code and sensitive areas regulations. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 4 V. Board of Architectural Review The way the Code says there are BAR guidelines, however, there are no guidelines for single family or multi- family development. Also there is no statement that says that the Board of Architectural Review must review PRD's. Council and Staff recommend that the entire section be deleted. ?: All PRD's still have to be reviewed by the Planning Commission? Ms. Shefrin: Yes. Mr. Clark: We were just talking about more BAR review, and now you're saying no BAR review. I feel we should delete the entire section. Ms. Shefrin: But they still apply to guidelines. You as the Planning Commission use the same BAR guidelines. You still have the authority to make recommendations on the architecture and features provided on -site. VI. Off-Site Perspectives The intent here is to provide vegetative screening to lessen the visibility of new buildings to properties located down - slope. The problem is, what is the definition of off -site? With Foster View we made the determination that off -site is 10 feet away from the property. When you're closer you might obtain something that provides a better screen. A problem with using off -site perspectives is there is a tremendous amount of artistic license that can be taken by an individual, and to what degree can an individual actually capture all the vegetation? The Council gave us a direction to use photomontages with future development over -laid. Mr. Meryhew: Should we include the possibility of a computer generated photo instead of restricting it to photomontage? Ms. Shefrin: The most accurate version of the photomontage is computer generated but the cost is significantly more than an artist's version. Ms. Stetson: So is this a cost issue? Mr. Meryhew: The cost is in direct proportion to the size of the PRD. I recommend approval with addition that it could be computer generated photo montage. Mr. Clark closed the Work Session and opened thePublic Hearing at 8:OOpm. There were no citizen's comments. MS. STETSON MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF MAY 26, 1994. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission /b 'Z ` Page 5 Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Case #'s L94 -0037, L93 -0089, L93 -0088, L94 -0041; Foster Library Ms. Stetson stated stated for the record that she is currently a member of the Friends of Foster Library and has been so for 15 years, and asked if anyone had objections to her hearing this proposal. There were no objections. The staff report was presented by Ann Siegenthaler. The King County Library System and Tukwila entered into a local agreement providing Tukwila with a replacement for the old Foster Library. The new library will be located at the intersection of 144th and 42nd Avenue South. Four separate approvals are needed: 1) Special Permission for the amount of parking; 2) Conditional Use Permit approval; 3) Design Review and approval of the library design; and 4) Special Permission for the design of signs (included as part of design review) Special Permission - Parking Staff has concluded that the parking is comparable at this site to other library sites. Other libraries have 26 stalls, this proposal is for 34 stalls. Foster Library includes a 55- person meeting room, other libraries have a 51 person meeting room. In Design Review, revisions to the parking lot design will be discussed, such as saving large trees, which would reduce the parking stall number down to 33 or 32. At this site there is also off -street parking available. Based on this, staff concludes that parking will be adequate, and recommends approval of parking. Conditional Use Permit The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to look at potential impacts of unusual types of projects. In this case the Foster Library is in a residential zone, a public facility,and requires a Conditional Use Permit under the Zoning Code. Staff noted two concerns: aesthetic impacts to the surrounding area and potential light spill -over into adjacent residences. Staff feels that further evaluation is needed to determine the aesthetic impacts of how the building and landscaping is going to look. To address light spill -over, additional screening and landscaping is needed around the site. There is a concern that parking headlights from the parking lot and lights in the lot might spillover to the adjacent homes. The details of how these are resolved were deferred from the project SEPA review to the BAR Design Review. Given that all issues can be addressed, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Special Permission -Sign Review There are two signs proposed: a wall sign at the entrance and a monument sign at the southeast corner. Staff identified three issues: 1) a concern about the size of the monument sign (as it is currently proposed it exceeds the Sign Code limit per size); 2) it's not clear what materials and colors are proposed for the signs and there is; 3) no indication of how the signs will be Planning Commission /1LR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 6 illuminated. The applicant has agreed that the Sign Code requirements will be met, will revise plans to include details of color and materials, and the illumination will be integrated into . the architecture. Staff recommends approval of both signs, pending submittal and approval of revised plans and drawings. Design Review Additional materials provided by the applicant were distributed. The public has been notified of the project through notices being mailed out, signs posted at the site, articles in the Hazelnut and a public information meeting. Public comments are included in the material handed out tonight. This area has been identified as a focal point for the neighborhood. The project will be very visible to the community and a high quality design is very important. The architect has revised the original drawings to better address issues of quality and how it will fit into it's neighborhood context. This is 'evident in the material board and the colored sketch (entered these into public record). The top part of the building will be a dryvit, stucco type material but the majority of the building will be brick. Staff has identified 18 issues that were not well addressed by the applicant. For example, the landscape plan has two different street trees proposed and there is not sufficient site lighting. There was a question about whether there is convenient barrier free access to the main entrance. On the building design, staff had concerns about how the building is detailed, such as the downspout material, and patterns used on the facade were not repeated elsewhere. Since the staff report was prepared, staff has met with the applicant to further discuss these concerns. The result of that meeting is that the applicant has agreed to all the 18 items of concern and will work with staff in making the refinements. Mr. Clark: Which architect is representing the project? Ms. Siegenthaler: Landscape architect is Jongejan, Gerrard, McNeal and the architect is Reed Reinvald. Mr. Neiss: I would like some elaboration of what the relationship is of the building to the street. Ms. Siegenthaler: The applicant explored several options of how the building could face the street. It is my understanding that this was the best orientation of the building, given the program and site requirements and design quality issues. The applicant was trying to balance the orientation with some of the other concerns. Mr. Neiss: How it co- habitats with Foster High School seems to be an issue. Ms. Siegenthaler: There is a danger with this sort of orientation of the project appearing to turn it's back to the neighborhood, so how the entry is treated becomes very important. f Planning Commission /btiR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Ilmar Reinvald, Architect with Reed Reinvald: Page 7 Since the library is a civic building it has several attributes. It needs to be simple without being dull, a building where you are proud to take visitors, with a quality of uniqueness, and a sense of order and serenity to be a good neighbor. It should be well lit and have gathering places inside and outside. Fencing and plantings will be provided to address high school traffic going through the site. We recognize the importance of the corner of 144th and 42nd, making that more important than any other corner. The building is oriented as it is because it was felt the parking should be behind the building. The entry needed to address both the street for pedestrians arrivals and the parking lot. It will be a cut out of a simple rectangle, 16 feet by 30 feet with a plaza in front for civic events. Mr. Neiss: On the drawing it appears that the window detail is different on the west wall. Will those be equalized? Mr. Reinvald: Yes for the sake of uniformity as well as a functional requirement. Mr. Neiss: The south elevation, where you would be getting the most amount of natural light has the least of windows. Mr. Reinvald: The north side provides the most even light for reading. The library is organized on the inside such that there is a public meeting room and public toilets on the south side. Mr. Meryhew: Is there a book drop area from the outside? Mr. Reinvald: It is next to the entry. The parking space closest to the entry will be a unload only spot. Currently it is indicated as handicap parking but that will be revised. Mr. Meryhew: I am also concerned that the parking lot will be a hangout for the high school kids. Nancy Smith, Associate Director, King County Library System: We are looking at options because being so close to the high school we need to balance the need to be a safe, good place for kids while not creating a "hang out." We don't have a good answer at this time, but it is a big discussion point. Mr. Clark: I would like the citizens to have an opportunity to look at the color board this evening if you don't have any objections (passed around materials board to audience). It appears that there is a mistake or did you intend this to be the top band color? Mr. Reinvald: The sample below is more accurate than the drawing, but the colors are in the right positions on the board. Mr. Clark: I have noticed that the medallions have a variety of shapes. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 8 Mr. Reinvald: We have a sample here with us tonight. The staff and I have discussed possibly tapping into the City of Tukwila art program and having the medallions custom designed by local artists to tell some kind of a story. Mr. Clark: What is the depth of the relief? Mr. Reinvald: A total of 18 inches. Staff has a concern about how far it sticks out, we will be studying that further. Mr. Clark: I feel that if it is an architectural detail, that it should be a prominent one. Mr. Reinvald: We have been considering 24 inches, but I don't feel it should go out any more than that. The height of the bottom stepof the cornice to the top of the parapet is about five feet. Mr. Meryhew: Is this medallion sample the actual size the medallions will be? Mr. Reinvald: No, they will be approximately 24 X 24 inches. Mr. Clark: What is the HVAC or heating system for this building? Scott Waytashek: Project Architect, Reed Reinvald: The heating system will be roof mounted in a mechanical well, hidden from the street view. Mr. Meryhew: Will they be visible from the second floor of Foster High School? Mr. Waytashek: No, I don't believe so. Mr. Clark: That is a hot issue for the Planning Commission, not just for people on the street but also for people who have to view this from adjacent structures. How high is the parapet? Mr. Waytashek: 20 feet, and the units are below that. To see them they have to be at least 20 feet up. The parapet above the finished roof is six feet where the mechanical well is located on the roof. The three mechanical units are five feet high. Mr. Neiss: How do you propose to address the safety issue at the location of the dumpster and employee entrance? Mr. Waytashek: The library system has agreed to install some additional lighting. Mr. Neiss: Has there been any discussion about doing a drive -by book drop? Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 9 Ms. Smith: Those book drops are very popular with the public, but they are staff intensive to empty them. Libraries are operated with limited numbers of staff, so by having them dumped directly into the building eliminates more staff time and will keep the books drier and cleaner. Mr. Meryhew: Is there a safety problem with an indoor book drop? Mr. Reinvald: It is normal practice to make the inside of a book drop space either out of concrete or many layers of gypsum wall board so it is explosion proof. Mr. Clark: Does the library system have a recycling program and is the garbage area large enough to support both garbage and recyclables? Ms. Smith: We are building to accommodate a recyling program. Mr. Reinvald: The garbage facility will be on a concrete base with a masonry stucco -like finish. Mr. Meryhew: What will the hours of operation be? Ms. Smith: Open six days a week, closing at 9:OOpm three evenings and 6:OOpm the other three. Mr. Meryhew: I am concerned that the lighting adequately addresses safety issues. Mr. Waytashek: The parking lot will be adequately lit, at a higher level than most parking lots. Currently there are no measures to close the parking lot during closed hours. Mr. Meryhew: Will police monitor the area? Ms. Smith: In other cities where we have experienced problems we have been able to work with the police departments and we assume we can get that here also. Mr. Neiss: With the building orientation the way it is, doesn't that block the visibility of the parking lot from the street? Mr. Waytashek: We think it will still be relatively visible from S. 144th Street. Mr. Meryhew: What kind of fencing will be used? Mr. Waytashek: We are proposing a six foot wood fence on the west and north perimeter and six foot tall dense plantings. That should eliminate the high school traffic cutting through there. Mr. Clark: I was unaware of an elevation change which would necessitate a handicapped accessible ramp. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 10 Mr. Reinvald: 99% of the handicapped will be arriving by Metro van or personal car and will use the appropriate parking spaces. There could be elderly which find it easier to access the building by the ramp on 144th. The elevation change is approximately three feet. Mr. Clark: I feel the entrance should be softer, not a triangular shape. It would be nice to incorporate the art work as you suggested. Ms. Siegenthaler: There are no immediate plans to incorporate art into the project but we will provide the opportunity. Mr. Reinvald: Regarding the harshness of the triangular entrance, the drawing in front of you shows how the handicapped ramp and paving works, but in reality there is a great deal of planting around there with the intention to soften. We had to make it triangular to conform with the geometry of the building and to get the length required for the handicapped ramp. Mr. Clark: The two circular columns at the entrance are metal. I don't think that would resist vandalism. Mr. Waytashek: It is actually structural steel pipe. Mr. Neiss: Can you please elaborate on your plans to protect the existing trees in the parking lot area? Mr. Reinvald: There is a beautiful elm tree which we would like to preserve. At this stage of the project we can't say exactly how many parking spaces we would lose, but we think it will be only one. Mr. Clark: How many parking stalls are at the current library site on Military Rd.? Ms. Smith: That site is 6,000 square feet and has approximately 36 stalls. Bob Ueller, 15220 40th Avenue South, Tukwila (citizen) My house is about five blocks south of the proposed library. I think the library is much too small, it's not a significant improvement over the current library. There is only one other library that's smaller. It doesn't seem to plan for population growth in Tukwila. The site does not allow for any additions to be put on the building. Burien had a 15,000 square foot library and after 23 years added on a square footage more than the proposed Tukwila library. Do you think this proposal will satisfy Tukwila's needs for the next 20 years? Allen Doerschel, Finance Director, City of Tukwila: The interlocal agreement was signed two years ago. That agreement established certain revenues which are generated by the City which go to the library system. It called for a 5,000 -5,250 square foot building to be built initially and to be expandable to 7,500 square feet. This lot is capable of ttr i... Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 11 expanding to that size. The current library is 1,900 square feet so this proposal is double that. There is another branch in the City of Tukwila which is also 1,900 square feet. Ms. Smith: I was not working for the library system when the project began but I know at the beginning, there was some discussion about building a 10,000 square foot library and getting rid of the other branch. It was decided with the City that they wanted to retain the two separate buildings. We don't believe that it will serve the entire citizenry of Tukwila as we would like. We have certain tiers of sizes of libraries. Burien is the largest other than Kent and Federal Way. It is meant to serve as a primary resource center for people in this area. At some point we might look at building a third site, perhaps a remodel of an existing building. David Livermoore, 13212 31st Avenue South, Tukwila (citizen): I have seen improvements tonight from the initial design of the building. A concern I still have is the wheelchair ramp. That is a sharp corner to push a chair around. I am also concerned that the building is out by the road and the parking lot is hidden, I feel it's a safety concern; I don't think the police will see things. I think the building would have more impact if it could visually stand alone rather than have the high school directly behind it. Pam Carter, 4115 S. 139th, Tukwila (citizen) It is hard for the citizens to see the changes that have been made when we just have to look at the small pictures you have here tonight. We would have liked to have had the opportunity to get up close and personal and see the proposed design. I don't see any bike racks indicated in the drawings, I don't want it to be an afterthought, it should be required. The sign appears to only be visible from two directions, if you're heading east and south. It is important to have lighting during the open hours and some after hours, but it doesn't seem that the lights need to be as bright after hours. I am concerned that the size of the meeting room has been decreased. It concerns me that other changes to the interior have been made. Mr. Waytashek: There have been changes to the interior from the schematic plan. Part of the change has to do with the book shelving and entry lobby being reduced to add more space in another area. The meeting room space has not been decreased it has just been reconfigured. Ms. Smith: In order to get the number of books inside the building that we need, there needs to be a certain amount of stack floor space. That pushed the meeting room wall down some to get that count. Mr. Clark: What is the size of the meeting room? Mr. Waytashek: I believe it is 400 square feet. Mr. Neiss: Can you address the question about the visibility of the sign, how visible is it from the street? Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 12 Mr. Waytashek: I think it will be very visible from three sides. There are large trees on the south- west corner which will hide the driveway entrance to some degree. This is a neighborhood facility and will become quite familiar to those who use it. Mr. Neiss: What about the bike racks and benches in the lawn? Mr. Waytashek: We have not shown any of that at this point. The front entry court is quite large and it is anticipated that seating will be provided. We need to further define that space before those things are drawn in. Bike racks will be incorporated. Ms. Siegenthaler: Staff had asked for benches to be provided. However, the applicant expressed some safety and maintenance concerns. Ms. Smith: Part of our concern about more outdoor seating revolves around the problem of creating a hang -out place for kids. That creates more litter and more staff time to clean and monitor. We hoped to see how the building begins to operate, then see what could be done to provide seating. Mr. Meryhew: If the building is expanded in the future, will there continue to be adequate parking? Mr. Waytashek: The current expansion plans would be to the north of the facility which would place a restriction on the parking because the site is small. Mr. Clark: Why is the entry lobby so closed off? • Mr. Waytashek: It is designed that way so that at night the community room can be opened up while the library can be closed off. Ms. Carter: The citizens are also concerned that the building turns its back to the street. I agree to put the entry at the corner of 42nd inviting the pedestrians in without walking all the way around the building. Ms. Stetson: That's what bothers me about this plan also. It seems like it would be easy to turn the building 1/4 turn at the corner of 42nd. That would make better use of the plaza areas. Dave Kistler, Head of Tukwila Library Board I was on the architect selection committee. I have seen drawings during this process that were a mirror image of the high school with a beautiful circular entry. After several discussions, we determined that part of the problem of mirroring the high school was that the library needed its own identity. There are many people that wanted a back door in the library so you don't have to walk around the building if you're coming up 44th. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 13 Mr. Neiss: Do you think it's realistic, given the prominence of Foster High School, that the library will ever stand on its own? Mr. Kistler: The actual library site is three feet higher and has a parapet. As long as the materials are somewhat different and the lines are different it will stand on its own. The plans that had the corner entry made it seem part of the high school. Ms. Smith: Operationally in a library we can't have two entrances because that would require high staffing. We wanted the library to have its own identity as much as possible. It is a public facility. Mr. Ueller:It would be nice to see on one of these charts, the number of square feet per 10,000 people that are to be served by the library. It would give us a statistic to determine if its size is adequate or not. Ms. Smith: In determining the structure in the bond issue, the system undertook a study of projections of population densities. It comes down to our defined service areas as opposed to the geographical and political entities. Mr. Clark: Regarding the access, it appears the radius's are a little too sharp on both of the entrances. Has engineering reviewed this yet? Al McDonald, 4246 S. 146th, Tukwila (citizen): I have a concern about the invitational effect on the kids from school. I know there is uneasiness about what the kids might do to the building, but they have to be invited and the atmosphere must reflect that. From a senior citizen's view, the meeting space is very important. Mr. Meryhew: Is the work room also available in the evening? Ms. Smith: No, the work room is a place where materials are sorted to go back to shelves. Mr. Clark closed the public hearing at 10:OOpm. Special Permission Parking Mr. Clark: The only thing we wanted to incorporate in the motion is the desire to retain large foliage. There appears to be no problem with the possible decrease of 1 -2 parking spaces. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L94 -0037 SPECIAL PERMISSION: PARKING BASED ON STAFF'S CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ACCEPT A DECREASE IN PARKING SPACES IF NECESSARY TO SAVE ELM TREE. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Conditional Use Permit MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L93 -0089 BASED ON STAFF'S CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Page 14 Design Review Criteria Mr. Pace: (unable to hear comments) Mr. Clark: Can you explain what is the problem with the traffic signal buttons? Ms. Siegenthaler: They are an additional cost item that staff didn't feel was necessary. Mr. Meryhew: I would like to remind you that you are across the street from a high school and there's lots of foot traffic. Mr. Clark: If the buttons were going to be effective they would need to be closer to the parking lot. You could put a concrete strip with beater bars which would work just as well. Mr. Meryhew: I would like to see something there to remind motorists that there is foot traffic, some sort of traffic signaling device. The condition should say something like: "Traffic signaling device shall be revised and moved closer using either buttons, bumps or humps." I liked the curve and small planting island in the sidewalk, the way it was proposed ( #2). I would like to see such details come back before the Planning Commission rather than go directly to the Planning Director. I think we should strike item 2 and use the curve in the sidewalk. Items number 3, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 should come back before the Planning Commission after changes are made for final approval. On number 14, I think we need to go through items a. through j. and make a decision as to what we want to do. Ms. Siegenthaler: If you do that, keep in mind that this is a draft with different ideas that could work. Once you start changing one item then you have to look at how that effects the rest of the facade. If you make specific solutions then you set a chain of events in motion. Mr. Clark: So we should just be considering these items as suggestions and staff and the applicant will be working together to bring together all the ideas. Ms. Stetson: We can indicate general areas of concern such as the east facade needs to be more street friendly, perhaps with bigger windows. Mr. Clark: On the north side I think we should drop the windows down so that it meets the concrete base as it does on the east and south elevations. The door on the east wall is the ugly duckling of the whole wall. Perhaps we can delete item 14 except for those two concerns. Mr. Meryhew: I would like to leave 14 in and let them work out the details and come back to us. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 15 Mr. Neiss: I suggest we accept 14 as it's stated and forget about the details a.through j. Let them do their job and provide better detailing. Mr. Meryhew: On item 18, I think we should change "such as" to "including bike racks... ". Mr. Pace: Do you want these items to come back to you as a public meeting or asa hearing instead? Mr. Meryhew: I think all we need is a public meeting since we've had the hearing. MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L93 -0088, DESIGN REVIEW, BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS, ALONG WITH THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ITEM 1- CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS (OR SOMETHING SIMILAR ): "TRAFFIC SIGNALING DEVICE AT ENTRY DRIVE SHALL BE REDESIGNED AND MOVED FURTHER FROM EXIT. DEVICES SHALL BE SOMETHING SIMILAR TO BUTTONS, HUMPS OR BUMPS." ITEM 2 - DELETED ITEMS 3 -17 - ACCEPTED AS IS ITEM 18 - TO BE REVISED TO READ, "PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE STREET FURNITURE INCLUDING BIKE RACKS, TRASH RECEPTACLES, ETC., WHICH IS APPROPRIATE TO A PUBLIC FACILITY AND INTEGRATED WITH THE OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT. ALL ITEMS EXCEPT 3, 4, 5,13,14,15,16,17 TO BE APPROVED BY DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT FURTHER REVIEW BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW. ITEMS 3, 4, 5,13,14,15,16,17 TO HAVE FINAL REVIEW BY THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW IN A PUBLIC MEETING. MR. NEISS SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Special Permission: Public Facility MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L94 -0041 SPECIAL PERMISSION: SIGN AS RECOMMENDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission /BAR Minutes of 6 -23 -94 Page 16 Mr. Clark called for a five minute break and then called the meeting back to order. Mr. CLark re- opened the public hearing at 10:55pm. Case #L94 -0035: Proposed Revisions to PRD Denni Shefrin provided the staff report. Prior to the opening of the public hearing there was a workshop held to go over the six items that have been identified as potential changes necessary to the PRD. Item 1 - Attached versus Detached Units in Single Family Zone Recommendation from Planning Commission was that there would be no change to the existing provision. Mr. Meryhew: Didn't we ask that an example be included? Ms. Shefrin: You did give staff direction to seek better architectural design criteria. Item 2 - Minimum Property Size Recommendation from Planning Commission is that the entire section be deleted. The result of that is to allow PRD's to occur as an option. Item 3 - Related to Density and Minimum Lot Size What was recommended was that the density transfer provision be retained but there be a minimum lot area standard of 5,000 square feet. Staff is recommending that the wording on the top of page 7 be revised to read, "(1) Lot Size. The minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet in area and shall establish the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the PRD." On page 8 where you see items A -D, that already exists in the Code. We put that in with the anticipation that the Density Transfer may be omitted. You have chosen to keep that in. Item 4 - Density Transfer to the Developable Parts of the Site Recommended change occurs on page 9. Item 5 - Board of Architectural Review Recommendation was that the entire section be deleted. Item 6 - Off -Site Perspectives The proposed change is on the top of page 11 with the addition of "Photomontage or computer generated perspectives, taken from the nearest downslope.... ". MR. MERYHEW MOVED TO APPROVE L94 -0035 AS READ BY DENNI SHEFRIN, AND BY RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. MS. STETSON SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Case #L94 -0036 and L93 -0091: Best Sign Mr. Clark: Howard Turner is not present. Page 17 Mr. Pace: He wants to increase the size to 225 square feet. Staff recommends approval of both signs. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L94 -0036 BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. MR. NEISS MOVED TO APPROVE L93 -0091 BASED ON STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS. MR. MERYHEW SECONDED THE MOTION AND THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Mr. Clark adjourned the meeting. Prepared by, Diane Medler G2— THE SEATTLE TIMES MARK HINSHAW SUNDAY, APRIL 24, 1994 ARCHITECTURE/URBAN DESIGN Creative efforts make public projects appealing MARK HINSHAW Seattle Times columnist A few years ago, the first phase of a unique park opened up on the outskirts of Paris. Called the Park at La Villette, it was built on the site of a sprawling com- plex of slaughterhouses. Constructed during the reign of Napoleon III, the "abattoirs," as they were called, supplied Paris with its daily meat products. The place operated well into the 20th century and it was horrific — an interpretive display vividly shows the techniques used for killing and butchering. But La Villette demonstrates that even the most noxious of environments can be transformed into a place that is tranquil and beautiful. It now holds grand, tree - lined walkways, fascinating works of art and striking pieces of architec- ture. A new attitude locally Here in Puget Sound, we have two projects that reflect similar creative efforts to make places that • are normally off - putting into set- tings that are appealing and wel- coming. Both are surrounded by single family neighborhoods. Both reflect ` an attitude by local government that has rarely been seen over the past 40 years. • Sometime during the decades : that followed World War II, we lost our 200 - year -old tradition of build- ing elegant, refined civic works. • Local governments throughout the country, claiming "fiscal restraint," threw up hundreds of mean- spirit- ed, spartan public buildings. Many of these structures were so meagerly designed that they are now being demolished or considered for demo- lition. North SeaTac Park, off the north end of the airport, reflects a different sensibility. This is the area in which, over the past 10 years, the Port of Seattle has been buying and clearing out houses because of the impact of approaching jets. A phased master plan, developed by the firm of Jones and Jones, will be carried out over the next several years. Many of the old streets will be removed, but some will remain as access lanes or trails. A new grid will be placed upon the rolling landscape: Double rows of regularly spaced trees will extend hundreds of feet across the length and width of the park, occasionally disappear- ing into existing stands of trees only to emerge on the other side. This grid is cocked at an angle to the surrounding street network. The result will be a dramatic pattern discernible from the air and on the ground. A host of small "parks within a park" will be found within the squares and rectangles formed by this grid of trees. Some will have play fields. Others will contain existing wetlands. There will be facilities for riders of both BMX RON VURZER /SEATTLE TIMES The North SeaTac Community Center is an example of architecture that lifts the spirits. bikes and horses. A serpentine trail will slice through the grid and link many of the interior places. While not yet under construc- tion, the park already contains a piece of architecture that is abso- lutely stunning — the North SeaTac Community Center, just west of the intersection of 24th Avenue South and South 138th Street. Just approaching this building lifts the spirits. Inside and out, the , community center is a feast of bold, muscular forms, deftly designed details and inspired public spaces. The sponsors of this building — King County, the Port of Seattle and, more recently, the city of SeaTac — deserve considerable praise for encouraging such a superb piece of architecture. A few miles to the south is another commendable project. Typically, the design of a waste- water treatment plant would not be considered fitting subject matter for a column on architecture. But this place is not only noteworthy, it is deserving of a design award. The Lakota Treatment Plant is being copied in European cities. The Federal Way Sewer and Water District opened the new Lakota Treatment Plant on Dash Point Road a few years ago. Only a few such plants have been built anywhere in the world. In fact, the water district studied innovative examples in Japan. As a result, its facility is being copied in European cities and served as a model for the West Point plant in Seattle. Breaking down the scale The plant is so refined in appearance that, at first glance, it might be a small college campus. Its structures are covered with earth - tone colored brick and concrete block, with banding and "soldier" courses skillfully used to break down the scale of the larger walls. The masonry was specially colored. It is available under the name Lakota brick. But it is more than materials that make this place so unusual. It is built on a hillside, with structures stepped and terraced down the slope, not unlike an Italian hill town. The processing tanks — typically ungainly and offensive — have been buried. Their rooftops are covered DT ir-u A Mj- j()MES with vine - covered wooden trellises. A group of publicly accessible tennis courts have been wedged into a slot between portions of the plant. The place is so pleasant that it is not hard to imagine an elegant reception, or even a wedding, taking place on its grounds. HDR, the architecture and engi- neering firm that developed the design, was assisted by the land -. scape architecture firm of Peterson Buckingham. The collaborative ef- forts of these two firms are abundantly evident. ,However, all is not perfect. - Someone recently decided to ring the plant with an ugly chain link fence topped with strands-of barbed wire. A rediscovered sensibility The water district is considering the addition of interpretive displays that will explainthe treatment process. The district should look for ways of incorporating public art into the grounds as well, perhaps a piece that speaks to the purification of water. These projects are but singular examples of a rediscovered sensibi- lity toward public works. We are just beginning to see many exam - pies of fine buildings and structures, even those that are normally con,- sidered utilitarian. Because the public is not used to boldness in its public buildings, some people will likely be offended: But that is the nature of architec ture — to stimulate and stir passions. All of our communities " deserve to have civic works of this type, adding energy and vitality to our lives. Mark L. Hinshaw is a private consultant who provides urban design services to local governments. Recent buyout in- NEWS CONTENT IN THIS SECTION PREPARED BY aines Tom Kelly dicates mortgage market is chang- ing. PAGE G 3 H J � J ESTATE THE SEATTLE TIMES • SEATTLE POST - INTELLIGENCER SECTION Mark Hinshaw Public projects with a lot of pizazz. PAGE G 2 Gardening Hold off Planting tomatoes and other heat lovers outdoors. PAGE G 5 Real estate classified PAGES G 6 -16 SUNDAY, APRIL 24, 1994 Did you have leaks in the rare .y 1 vuregar storms? Inspect rafters in attic, :wash as usua visible; look for wet spots on rafters = FILTER or sheathing and under eaves. , _ .Wash 5i or dish r;m wall tr vents' lakesure V of in the sum - ,ieed additional attic gables or roof. ters,.,check/reset You don't have an ;switch "on your furnace, 9neit111ed (ca11 CERTIFICATION 92-063 City Clerk /, INTERLOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE QTY OF TUKWILA AND THE KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT THIS AGREEMENT is dated the 19th day of December 1991, and is entered into by and between King County Rural Library District, hereinafter referred to as the "District ", and the City of Tukwila, hereinafter called the "City": WHEREAS, the City owns the building housing the Tukwila Library, at 14475 59th Avenue South, and WHEREAS, the District owns the building housing the Foster Library, at 4205 South 142nd, and WHEREAS, the City currently pays an annual contract fee to the District for provision of library services within the City, and WHEREAS, the City by Ordinance No. 1619 will initiate the process for annexation of the City into the District pursuant to Section 27.12.360, RCW, and WHEREAS, the District will not realize any direct tax revenue for operation of the libraries and provision of library services until the 1993 calendar year, and the City and the District desire to make provisions for continued funding of library operations during the calendar year 1992, now, therefore, the parties agree as follows: 1. The District will continue to assume maintenance and utility costs for the Tukwila and Foster Libraries in 1992. 2. The District will hold the City's 1992 contract at the 1991 fee level of $564,021. 3. The District recognizes the importance of neighborhood libraries to the City of Tukwila and consequently agrees to maintain library services at both the Foster and Tukwila libraries. 1 4. The District agrees that if the City chooses to annex to the District, the District will be responsible and pay for the construction and all related costs of at least a 5,000 square foot library expandable to 7,500 square feet, including furnishings and materials and appropriate surface parking exclusively for library patrons, and an anticipated completion date in early 1995 (replaces existing Foster branch). This will be a full service library which will have maximum hours, programs and services commensurate with similar sized libraries. 5. The Tukwila Library at 14475 59th Avenue South will be maintained at a minimum of current service levels. 6. The District will provide or pay up to $400,000 for suitable land (the site) for the structure and parking with the requirements that: a) the site be chosen jointly by the City and the District and will have convenient access .with good visibility. b) the design and construction will be consistent with the standards of current District building projects and be in keeping with the desired neighborhood concept. 7. The City shall be the designated SEPA lead agency for all SEPA reviews. 8. Any off -site public improvements such as street, sidewalk, storm drainage and /or utility modifications as may be required as a result of the construction of the library shall be paid for by the District. 9. All on -site work and improvements, such as site preparation, grading, landscaping, shall be paid for by the District. 10. The City by its Mayor shall designate City administration personnel to participate in the District's design review process for the library, and to act as coordinator with the District during the planning, design and construction processes. 11. The District will continue to reimburse the City for the library's portion of maintenance and utility costs for the library's portion of the existing Tukwila Library building at 14475 59th Avenue South. District will pay $1 per year for an annual lease. 2 10242 12. If the City chooses to -annex to the District, then within 60 days of the date of certification of the results of the annexation election, City and District by a supplemental interlocal governmental agreement shall either supplement or amend this agreement to more specifically set forth the terms and conditions relative to the Matters set forth in Paragraphs 1 through 11 above. General Recitals 1. This agreement is to define the rights and obligations of the parties in the event annexation of the City to the District is approved at a special election to be held prior to May 26,1992. Included in the purposes of this agreement is the provision for continued funding by the City of library services within the City during the period between January 1,1992 and December 31, 1992. If annexation to the District is not approved at said election, this agreement shall be of no further force or effect. 2. Should annexation to the Library District fail to pass, and the City chooses to continue to contract with the Library District for services, it is understood that a) The contract rate for library services for the calendar year commencing January 1, 1993 will be according to the phase -in formula, and b) The contract rate for library services for the calendar year commencing January 1, 1994 and for calendar years thereafter will be 100 percent of the full comparable rate assessed taxpayers in the King County Rural Library District. 3. In the event the City chooses to appoint a Tukwila Library Board of Trustees during any time period when the City is annexed to the District, the District shall regularly solicit input from the Board on issues relating to all aspects of library services and facilities for the residents of Tukwila. ...•.. 10242. 2 KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY CITY OF DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES • 102 King County Rural Library District Board of Trustees Resolution No. 1992 -1 January 7, 1992 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT CONCURRING, SUBJECT TO CONDITION, WITH THE ANNEXATION OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA INTO THE KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila has passed an ordinance which initaties the process for a special election to determine whether the City of Tukwila shall be annexed into the King County Rural Library District, and WHEREAS, RCW 27.12 provides a process for the annexation of cities and towns into rural library districts, and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees believes that the annexation would be in the best interest of all involved, and WHEREAS, the several steps to be taken to meet the boundary changes requirements necessitate the taking of this action by the Library District. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE.KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT THAT: The Board of Trustees of the King County Rural Library District does hereby concur with the City of Tukwila in its intent to annex to the King County Rural Library District. PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 7th DAY OF JANUARY, 1992. /- (Ay- �✓ l' // I) CA -(/6/ d't 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 January 8, 1992 DE /pb libtukw.pb ©1:! icr i..'•....,, ! ?0f! SIMS Introduced by: Proposed No.: 9244 ORDINANCE NO. :1.1E) 242 AN ORDINANCE establishing the date for an election on the question of annexation of the City of Tukwila into the King County Rural Library District, and declaring an emergency. FINDINGS OF FACT: The City of Tukwila, Washington by Ordinance No. 1619, has initiated the proposed annexation and expressed its intent to join the King County Rural Library District, finding that the public interest will be served thereby. The City's library board has reviewed Ordinance No. 1619 and recommends submission of the proposed annexation to the voters. City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 1619 does satisfy the provisions of RCW 27.12.010(5), and 27.12.360 requesting the calling of an election to be held among the qualified voters therein. The Board of Trustees of the King County Rural Library District by Resolution No. 1992 -1 has concurred with the proposal as submitted on January 7, 1992, all in accordance with RCW 27.12.360. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF KING COUNTY: SECTION 1. A special election shall be held on the 10th day of March, 1992, within the City of Tukwila. The ballot proposition shall be in substantially the following form in accordance with RCW 27.12.370: "Shall the City of Tukwila, Washington be annexed to and be part of the King County Rural Library District ?" YES NO 1 • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 38' 19 20 • 102%2. SECTION 2. Notice of election shall be published as required by law. SECTION 3. The county council finds as a fact and declares that an emergency exists and that this ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, or safety or for the support of county government and its existing. institutions. INTRODUCED AND READ for the first time this / - day of .2771 t€.e..1i3-t4. , 19.2. PASSED this ATTEST: ' day of L-42.11,U aA-t-1 KING COUNTY COUNCIL KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DE lerk of the Council APPROVED this 7.?'�i. , 19 day o .�v King County Executive Px_A CERI •ICAlIVN • _C-4w4.. f` try• • City Clef k of the Cloy o. c'o certify that thy.; is •3 true and correct copy of the original on file with the City �^ DA'T�D this 1— day of �-4icc,ft- 19 ci City Clerk CITY OF TUKWILA WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. /6 /9 10242 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY TO JOIN AND BE ANNEXED BY THE KING COUNTY RURAL LIBRARY DISTRICT; REQUESTING THE CONCURRENCE OF THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES; AND REQUESTING THE COUNTY COUNCIL TO CALL A SPECIAL ELECTION IN THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT FOR MARCH 10, 1992, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING THE ANNEXATION TO THE VOTERS. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the interests of the residents of the City of Tukwila would be best served by annexing to the King County Rural Library District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 27.12.360, the process of annexation must be initiated by an ordinance of the City stating the City's intent to join the District and finding that the public interest will be served thereby; and WHEREAS, the City's Library Advisory Board has reviewed this proposed ordinance pursuant to RCW 27.12.360 and provided its recommendations; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Declaration of Intent and Fin 1S. The City of Tukwila hereby declares its intent to join and be annexed by the King County Rural Library District Having weighed the options for providing library services to the citizens within the City, the City Councll finds that the public interest will be best served by annexation to the said District; provided, that this ordinance shall only be effective upon execution of an interlocal agreement in substantially the form attached. Section 2. Transmittal to District — Request for Concurrence, Pursuant to RCW 27.12.360, the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Board of Trustees of the King County Rural Library District. The City Council requests that the Board of Trustees concur in the proposed annexation of the City by the District Section 3. Transmittal to County Council — Request for Special Election Pursuant to RCW 27.12.360 and .370, if the Board of Trustees concurs in the annexation, the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify, and to send a certified copy of this Ordinance and a copy of the District's concurrence, to the King County Council. The King County Council is hereby requested to call a special election to be held in the City of Tukwila on March 10, 1992, which is provided in RCW 29.13.010 and is not less than forty-five (45) days from the date of this declaration and finding. The King County Council is also requested to give notice of the election as provided for in RCW 29.27.080. The purpose of the election shall be to submit to the qualified voters within the City of Tukwila a ballot proposition in substantially the following.form: DDl1Dnerrw KT Krn 1 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THAICITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a special meeting thereof this /9 day of ,1991. APPROVED AS TO FORM: - eti f iz/ fqi Office of the City (attorney Filed with the City Clerk: /ot - /8- S/ Passed by the City Coundl: Published Valley Daily News: / -.5-- 9:2. Effective Date: /- /0- 9Z Ordinance Number /S l 9 ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: ke ait-t- • Cantu, City Clerk City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director ink, NEW FOSTER LIBRARY Project Information: Preliminary design drawings have been completed for the new Foster Library at 4060 South 144th Street, across from Foster High School. The one -story library building will be 5,250 square feet in area, including a 500 s.f. meeting room. Improvements to the 1.5 -acre site include 26 parking stalls, new landscaping, sidewalks, and street trees. Opportunities for comment: Citizens may submit comments on the library's design in several ways: • Attend Public Information Meeting 2/15 (see below) • Send letter or call-in comments to City by 2/18 • Attend Public Hearing 3/24 (see below) At the public information meeting, draft drawings and plans will be on display. The library architect, Tukwila Library Board and the King County Library System will also be there to answer your questions and to listen to your suggestions on the library's design. The Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will review the design of the new library at a future public hearing. Below is the schedule for the two meetings: PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING: • Where: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. - -- Same - -- • When: Tuesday Thursday February 15, 1994 March 24, 1994 6:30 -7:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. If you have any comments on the new Foster Library design or questions about the upcoming meetings, you may contact Ann Siegenthaler (206/431 -3670) or mail comments to: City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 %/ / s6 • Cori-,,0---s,.=71 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 King County Library System 31111 lit %cow! North • St•ttlllc, \1'arhinstnn')i311►') -.>IOI • 1'20(,) I62- 961111 October 1, 1992 LAWYERS TITLE COMPANY OF WASHINGTON, INC. 1230 South 336th Street Federal Way, WA 98003 Re: Escrow No. 323583FS To Whom It May Concern: Scott E. Burdine, is the owner of property located at 14239 42nd Avenue South, Seattle, Washington. King County Library System (KCLS) is the buyer of property located at 4060 South 144th Street, Seattle, Washington. W.M.C. Contractors, Inc. is the seller of the property located at 4060 South 144th Street, Seattle, Washington. In preparation for acquiring the property KCLS commissioned a survey which was conducted by D.R. Strong, Consulting Engineers Inc. The survey revealed that Mr. Burdine's southern and western fences and the storage shed at the southwest corner of his property are encroaching on the property which W.M.C. Contractors, Inc. is selling to the King County Library System. In order to allow for completing of the sale of the property and in consideration of the mutual promises made herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Mr. Burdine acknowledges that his southern and western fences and storage shed are encroaching on the neighboring property as indicated on the survey by D.R. Strong, Consulting Engineers dated September 11, 1992. 2. Mr. Burdine agrees that he does not now nor will he in the future seek to claim property rights through adverse possession due to the encroachment noted above. 3. King County Library System agrees that Mr. Burdine can maintain his southern and western fences and his storage shed in their current locations for a period of up to fifteen years. This right applies to the current structures only. If for any reason the fences or shed are rebuilt at any time, their location will be adjusted to the actual property lines. In any event, at the end of fifteen years from the date this agreement, the fences and shed will have been relocated so as to no longer enroach onto KCLS property. Libraries Located In: Algona. Bellevue. Black Diamond. Bothell. 13oulevard Park, l3uricn, Carnation, Des Moines. Duvall. iairwood, Fall City, Federal Way, Foster, Issaquah. Kenmore. Kent. Kinesgate. Kirkland. lake Forest Park. Lake Hills. Maple Valley, Mercer Island. Mtuckleshoat, Ncwrntn Way. North Bend. Pacific. Redmond. Richmond Beam. Shoreline. Skykunnsh, Skyway. Snunualmre. Iltkwtla. Valley View. \ ;uhun. White Center Foster Site Agreement Page 2 The terms and conditions of this agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their sucessors and assigns. This use agreement may be extended at the end of fifteen years if mutually agreed between the property owners. This agreement is entered into on this first (1st) day of October 1992. FOR KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM William H. Ptacek,'Director 300 Eighth Avenue N. Seattle, WA 98109 Date : l� ) ;44'c foencr.doc Scott E. Burdine 14239 42nd Avenvue S. Seattle, WA 98168 Date: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director CITY OF TUKWILA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON- SIGNIFICANCE PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY DATE: June 6, 1994 PROPOSAL: To construct a 5,250 square -foot neighborhood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration swale, 6' wide curbside sidewalk and street trees. LOCATION: 4060 42nd Avenue South (NW corner S. 144th & 42nd Ave. S.), Tukwila, WA; SW 1/4 Sect. 15, Twn. 23, Rge. 4 APPLICANT: Architects Reed Reinvald FILE REFERENCE: SEPA Environmental Checklist #L93 -0087 Design Review Application #L93 -0088 Conditional Use Permit Application #L93 -0089 THRESHOLD This is a Mitigated Declaration of DETERMINATION: Non - Significance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW RECORD The environmental review of this proposal consisted of an analysis based on the following documents in the environmental record: a. SEPA Checklist submitted by Architects Reed Reinvald, dated December 3, 1993. b. Site plan, building elevations and landscape plan submitted December 3, 1993 by Architects Reed Reinvald, and revisions submitted May 16, 1994. c. Parking analysis chart from King County Library Services dated March 4, 1994, noting parking requirements at 26 area libraries. d. Trip Generation report dated October 29, 1992 by Transportation Planning & Engineering, Inc. e. Downstream Drainage Analysis dated November 1993 by Barrett Consulting Group. f. Geotechnical Report dated September 29, 1993 by Landau Associates, Inc. CC , Ca P OMkL U' r u, ri- e(t. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431 -3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 DESCRIPTION OF The applicant a vacant 1.15 - residential zo covered entry staff offices with exterior stone, and pai Foster Library MDNS 6/6/94, Page 2 THE PROPOSAL roposes to construct a new neighborhood library on cre site. The site is located in a single - family e. The 5,520 square -foot library will include a eading to a lobby, a 70- person Multi- Purpose Room, nd restrooms. The building will be 24' in height, f brick, stucco /Dryvit in earth tones, simulated ted metal accents. Site improveme landscaping, i shrubs; biofil seating wall. directed fixtu a 6' wide curb South and Sout existing Foste South. is will include a 35 -stall parking lot; cluding large stature street trees and screening ration swale; and a curving entry walk with a There will be parking lot lighting with down -ward es. Street improvements are also planned, such as ide sidewalk and street trees along 42nd Avenue 144th Street. This new facility will replace the Library located 1/2 block away on 42nd Avenue PRINCIPAL CHEC A. EARTH Other than is essenti demolished well cappe site is ex are antici B. WATER There are site. Mos surfaces. existing s on -site bi 144th is s C. PLANTS IST ITEMS a 2 -3' elevation gain from the street, the site lly flat. Construction debris from a house has been previously removed, and an old . No import or export of material to /from the ected. Based on this, no noticeable impacts ated, and no mitigation is necessary. o permanent surface water bodies on or near the of the site will be covered with impervious Storm water runoff will be addressed using the stem along South 144th, with the addition of an filtration swale. The 6" water main on South b- standard in size. The site h Existing v shrubs, an vegetation mature Ame not surviv areas. Ap s previously been cleared and developed. getation on site consists of mostly grasses and several large existing trees. Most of this will be replaced by new landscaping. A large, ican elm is proposed to be retained, but it may the impacts of construction and paving on root roximately 11 red alders along the northern Foster Library MDNS 6/6/94, Page 3 edge of the site will be retained. The proposed landscape design also includes large stature trees within the site and along the streets. Measures to ensure survival of "retained" trees should be included in the plans. Other mitigative measures should be evaluated through Design Review by the Board of Architectural Review, as noted below. D. NOISE The new library will likely generate more noise than that typically associated with residential areas. Some mitigative measures are proposed. The building and main entrance is located as far as possible from residences. Where single family residences abut the west side of the site, there will be a 40' wide landscape buffer. Elsewhere, parking areas will be buffered by a 10 foot landscape area. Noise will also be reduced by the library's limited hours, which will typically be from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Other mitigative measures should be evaluated through the Conditional Use Permit process. E. LAND USE The proposed library will be located in a residential zone, with residences nearby. As a non - residential use in a residential area, the library proposal raises concerns regarding auto and pedestrian circulation, compatibility of building architecture with the neighborhood, screening and landscaping, lighting and signage effects, and its aesthetic and functional relationship to the high school. As the library will be located in a residential zone, it will require a Conditional Use Permit. Potential impacts of the proposal will be evaluated through this process. However, specific impacts and mitigative measures should be evaluated in more detail through Design Review by the Board of Architectural Review. Through Design Review, the site plan and design details can be refined to provide the best fit with the surrounding neighborhood. F. AESTHETICS The project is expected to have an effect on the aesthetic character of the neighborhood. Compatibility with the neighborhood would be best addressed through the required Conditional Use Permit and through the public Design Review process. Foster Library MDNS 6/6/94, Page 4 G. LIGHT AND GLARE The new library has the potential for light spillover and glare not typically found in a residential zone. Parking area lights and headlights from frequent traffic could affect adjacent residences. Such effects should be addressed using appropriately- designed lighting standards, landscape screening, and /or solid perimeter fencing. The effectiveness of these measures should be evaluated in greater detail through the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review processes. H. RECREATION The Tukwila Parks and Open Space Plan encourages the development of outdoor non -city recreation facilities. In addition, the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan encourages locating public recreational facilities within easy access to residents. Based on these policies, the new library should provide quality outdoor areas for the public. To ensure that the library proposal meets City policies for passive recreation, plans should be further evaluated through the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review processes. I. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC It is estimated that the new library would generate approximately 250 (125 in, 125 out) vehicle trips to roads in the project area. Some of these vehicle trips will be additional over traffic generated by the existing library. Vehicles will use two driveways into the site, one of which will be new. The existing four -way stop at the intersection of 144th Street and 42nd Avenue will remain. The right -of -way along South 144th Street is substandard. In accordance with Tukwila Ordinance No. 1616, the property owner will be required to dedicate an additional 10 feet of right -of -way. Sidewalks are included in the proposal. Based on this, no significant traffic impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are necessary. MITIGATED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Issuance of a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance is appropriate, as the environmental review indicates no probability of significant adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. Below are the conditions of approval: .. Foster Library MDNS 6/6/94, Page 5 1. Water main: To address the sub - standard 6" water main on South 144th, the property owner shall sign a Water System No Protest Agreement to participate in the future upgrade of the main. 2. Trees: All trees proposed for retention shall be adequately protected during construction. Any of these trees lost within 3 years from the time of construction completion shall be replaced. 3. Design Review: To more specifically address potential impacts and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, the library design shall be further refined through the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review processes. The proposal shall include for Board of Architectural review the following revisions: a. To reduce light spillover into adjacent residential lots, the west and north perimeter of the site shall have a solid decorative fence and /or opaque landscape screening. b. Given Tukwila policies regarding outdoor recreation, the proposal shall provide quality outdoor areas for the public. Prep by: Ann Siegenthaler ..,. -„.. . City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director September 30, 1994 Mr. Scott Waytashek ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD 201 I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 .RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila Dear Mr. Waytashek: The information and materials you requested are provided in this transmittal, as follows: • Color /materials board is attached; • Planning Commission minutes for 8/25/94 public meeting (and a copy of the referenced staff report) are attached; • The contact person for the Tukwila Arts Commission is Ms. Lynn Devoir, Parks and Recreation Superintendent (433- 1846). The Commission meets the first Tuesday of each month; you may wish to attend this coming Tuesday. Arrangements can be made through Lynn. If you helve any questions on the above items, please let me know. We look forward to seeing your final design drawings, and working with you on your building permit drawings. Sincerely, Ann Siegenthaler Associate Planner cc: File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 41313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor May 6, 1994 Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Mr. Ilmar Reinvald ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD 201 I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila Dear Mr. Reinvald: Thank you for meeting with staff yesterday to review the revised design concept for our new Foster Library. Your enthusiasm and personal interest in the project is appreciated. To assist you in preparing materials for your Board of Architectural Review (BAR) hearing, I've enclosed some examples: 1) Photos of color /materials boards from previous projects reviewed by the BAR; and 2) Copies of Mervyn's project drawings reviewed by the BAR (as you requested). These are not very good reproductions, but I believe they convey the type of product expected by the BAR. As we discussed at our meeting, the deadline for submittal of revised BAR drawings is May 16, 1994. A materials board may be submitted by May 23, 1994. Meeting these deadlines will keep the project on schedule for the June 23, 1994 hearing. I hope the enclosed examples will be helpful. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. Sincere Ann Siegerfthaler Associate Planner cc: File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard • Tukwila, Washington 98188 Mr. Scott Scott Waytasbek Architects Reed Reinvald 201 North I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 Dear Scott: The City of Tukwila Arts Commission met on April 4 and have made some recommendations for art for the Foster Library. John W. Rants, Mayor They asked that the medallions on the outside of the building be the standard type and have suggested five patterns to be used: 1. Oak 2. Water Lily' 3. Fern and Fiddlehead 4. Songbird 5. Bamboo Stalk There were mix opinions regarding other art but they did narrow it to two mediums and have sent out requests for artist with experience in each area. The first area was an etched glass window for the north window. The second suggestion was to put two small sculptures preferably relating to story book characters on the lawn. I don't think that either of these suggestions will hold up your construction of the facility. This information will be given to the Community Development Department. We are excited about the possibilities for art in the library. Thank you for the opportunity to be a part of this exciting construction project. Sincere yours, ev s and Recreation Superintendent cc: D. Williams< A. Doerschel J; ;J.iniersoni. Art Commission Foster Library Board Phone: (206) 433-1800 • City Hall Fax (2061 433-1833 ' :!'. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development March 8, 1994 Mr. David Boe ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD 201 I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila Dear Mr. Boe: John W. Rants, Mayor Rick Beeler, Director Today I spoke with Doug Blair, who confirmed that the Foster Library proposal will be ready for review by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) in April 1994. I have reserved a place for your proposal on the hearing agenda for April 28, 1994. The BAR hearing will begin at 7:00 p.m. in the Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers. For a favorable staff recommendation, you will need to submit the revisions and materials requested in my letter of February 14, 1994. These must be submitted by March 21, 1994, or the project will be rescheduled to a later hearing date. Please call me if you have any questions on this. Sincerely, An Siegent er Associate P anner cc: Mr. Doug Blair Jack Pace Alan Doerschel File 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 206.522.3993 February 25, 1994 Ann Siegenthaler Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila, WA ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD Dear Ms. Siegenthaler, Further to your letter of February 14,1994 requesting revisions to our submitted SEPA Environmental Checklist, Conditional Use Permit Application, and Design Review Application, we have reviewed the 43 items with the King County Library System and have the following response (using the previous letter's format): A SEPA REVIEW 1. The SEPA checklist will be resubmitted with signature (this was an oversight on our behalf). 2. All reference to a future expansion will be removed from the drawings. 3. Existing trees on site will be verified and indicated on the site plans. 4. Site clearing: it is our understanding that all construction debris has been removed from the site and the existing well has been capped according to Ecology regulation 173 -160 WAC (Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance of Wells). 5. The 36" storm water detention pipe will be revised to include 54" diameter manholes on the construction documents. MITIGATED DETERMINATION LIE NON-SIGNIFICANCE 1. The KCLS will dedicate an additional 10 feet of right -of -way along South 144th Street for compliance with Tukwila Ordinance No. 1616 (the owner will contact the City for appropriate forms). 2. The KCLS will sign a Water System No- Protest Agreement for participation in the future upgrade of the substandard 6" water main on South 144th Street. 3. Design Review: please refer to following responses. 4. Outdoor Public Spaces: please refer to following responses. IL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Please refer to following responses. 201 North 1 Strew Tntanm, It4ubington 98403 Fax 206.572.1445 page - 2/8 DESIGN REVIEW Site Plan; 1. The entrance 'forecourt' along South 144th Street will be enlarged to the North (towards the building) to take into account your concerns. We would like to note that due to the main lobby for the library being 300 square feet, we do not want to create an overwhelming entrance sequence that dwarfs the impact of actually entering the library. 2. The loading and service areas are not functionally incompatible with the main entrance since the loading /unloading and servicing of the building happens when the library is closed and so no conflict between auto, pedestrian or bike traffic will occur. The trash and recycling areas will be adequately screened per BAR Design Guidelines and will be indicated on the building elevations. 3. We will review widening the West sidewalk to address your concerns. We have designed a 7 foot wide walk to take into consideration the bumper overhang of cars to allow for a minimum clearance of 5 feet while maintaining the appropriate scale for the library (see previous 'forecourt' item above). 4. We shall revise the site design to include alternate paving materials across both driveways. 5. We shall revise the site plan to show the book drop locations. 6. Street improvements: a) The plans will be revised to reflect the additional 10' of dedicated right -of -way. b) The plans as submitted incorporated a separated sidewalk along South 144th Street with a minimum 6' wide sidewalk and a minimum 5' wide planting strip with street trees. The planting strip will be irrigated. A 6' wide curbside sidewalk was indicated along 42nd Avenue South as required. 7. Parking: a) The parking proposed is based on the traffic studies for libraries of this size within the KCLS with an additional parking calculation based on more critical criteria using occupancy uses within the library. We have found that planning departments typically base the parking calculation for public libraries on a gross square footage calculation (e.g. 300 gross square feet per stall). We shall revise our plans to show maximum build -out of parking at this stage (which will provide 33 parking spaces). If the Planning Commission determines the parking requirement based on an assembly occupancy, we will have to reduce the size of the public meeting room to meet the maximum capacity of the site for parking. b) The minimum full -size parking space is to be 8.5 feet wide with minimum compact space to be 8 feet wide. c) The design as submitted provided for 26 full -size parking spaces (no compact spates at first phase). With full build -out of 33 parking spaces, 10 spaces will be compact size (for maximum of 30% of total need). Building Design: 8. The most important criteria in the development of the library design has been the unique location of the proposed site. The challenge has been to remain consistent both with the varying scale and quality of the single and multi- family residential uses to the North, South, and West, and the monumental scale and plan of the New Foster High School to the East. To address your concerns on this subject, we present the following ideas and issues explored in the designing of the submitted project: page - 3/8 History: In our research of the site and the surrounding community of Foster, we have developed a greater understanding of the unique history of the area. From the Duwamish villages of longhouses (simple horizontal structures clustered on the White River), to the legacy of Joseph Foster and his establishment of the first settler community (a learned man who came to the territory in 1853), the rich farmland which provided for the development of a strong community identity and the creation of civic amenities (both the Foster and Tukwila Libraries), and the tradition of community pride and activism that continues to this day. While we have not tried to tell a story of the area using a narrative design approach, we have tried to incorporate many conceptual references into the planning and detailing of the library. These references include the following: +Land Forms - the use of berms and swales on a reasonably flat site reflecting the local prehistoric sites of the native Duwamish people. +Simple Rectangular Form for the Main Reading Room Massing - like the Duwamish longhouse and the agricultural structures imprinted on the memory from the past. +Neoclassical Elements - the settlement by immigrants from Europe and their bringing of Western values and cultural identity. +Civic Siting - the placement of the library on the site within the civic context of the street intersection and the main entrance off the civic boulevard of South 144th Street. Neighborhood Context: We believe there is no specific "established neighborhood character" to this area. Adjacent to the proposed site is a single -story rambler house and a large multi-story apartment building to the North, a 1 1/2 story cottage house and a single -story double -wide mobile home to the West, a single -story rambler and a vacant lot to the south (with a large multi-story apartment building to the Southwest and a 1 1/2 story cottage house at the street intersection to the Southeast), and the monumental New Foster High School to the East. We do not believe the proposed site is accurately described as set within "a low- density, primarily residential, development in a Northwest suburban community." The setting is actually a neighborhood in transition with a combination of single family, multi- family, and public structures heavily influenced by major and minor arterial routes and the varying commercial atmosphere along Highway 99 (located two blocks to the West). New Foster High School: We have extensively studied the design of the New Foster High School (including meeting with the design architects Dean Willows and Chris Johnson of BJSS. We received a copy of the building construction documents for our reference during the design of the Foster Library). We concur with your assessment that "an imitation of the high school design is not appropriate for this small library" and that "some relationship between elements is desirable." The following comparisons clarify our design strategies: Windows and Fenestration: In particular we studied the window fenestration of the high school's street facades. The rhythmic relationship and balance of these windows are reflected in the east facade of the proposed library opposite the school. The high school window openings are grouped in a collegiate style reflecting the modular aspect of the classrooms behind (and the size and scale of those rooms). At the Library, regularly spaced 'eyebrow' openings relate to the rhythmic window layout of the high school. The library's windows similarly explain the main interior space within, they are located above the bookshelves on the interior of the space). The high school has commercial windows with aluminum extrusions The library will use wood clad windows which give greater character appeal both from within and outside the library. Ornate window moldings around the exterior of the window reflect a more domestic treatment of the fenestration giving a greater play of shadow, shade lines and texture in contrast to the high school which has no moldings or lintels. page -4/8 Columns and Entrance: The high school has columns located at the plaza pavilions suggesting entrance to the facility (of which there is no entrance). Similarly, a porticoed colonnade is the major design element at the entrance to the proposed library. The high school uses columns created from precast concrete cylinders, disks, and blocks appropriate to the scale of the facility. The library will have columns accurately proportioned to the building mass and their pedestrian location. While the high school has the benefit of size and mass to allow for lack of detail in the exterior elevations, the library (at 4% the size of the high school) must develop sufficient detail to maintain quality within its greatly reduced scale. Other issues relating to the Foster High School: +The proposed location of the library at the street intersection corner provides a Western edge to the monumental high school entrance plaza (this issue was specifically reviewed with the high school design architects). While the high school is able to abandon the street corner due to it's overwhelming scale, the library must hold the street edge and corner because of its residential scale. +The location of pedestrian routes support existing pedestrian travel pathways and minimize pedestrian /vehicle conflicts (pedestrian safety has been an important concern in the site development due to its proximity to the high school and the busy street intersection). +The stepped massing of the library presents the its largest elevation to the high school while reducing the building's scale toward the bordering houses to the North and West. +The proposed library will feature a similar landscape palette as the high school's, enhanced to create the garden quality of the library landscape design. Building Elements: We do not concur with your statement that the use of "Greco -Roman elements" are "typically found in more urban, monumental structures" and so are not appropriate for this site. The classical language in architecture has been used extensively in residential architecture since first introduced into the Veneto by Palladio in c.1550 (the Villa Capra in Vicenzia was a summer house set in the farmlands of northern Italy). In the United States, it was popularized by the residential design of Thomas Jefferson for his home in Monticello. In the centuries that followed, classical treatment of suburban and rural houses has undergone untold degrees of ornamentation from the austere proportion of the Georgian period, the outlandishness of the Victorians, and the refinement into the Queen Anne and the Arts and Crafts movements. The development of a classically inspired library in a suburban setting is probably best referenced by looking at the work H. H. Richardson in 1880's New England. While its true that Neoclassical architecture is found on a monumental scale within more urban settings, its use and interpretation on a domestic scale is as appropriate to this site as a large Greek revival bungalow built in 1920's. Since this is the 1990's, not the 1880's, we have made our interpretation of classical elements as deemed appropriate to their location, reference, and use. We have developed a building vocabulary which allows the elements to be different relating to their function and the use implied by their location (e.g. - the windows for the reading room are different from the windows for the staff room though they share common referential elements - as these windows are on separate massing elements of the building, they are never seen in the same plane). We do not agree that the design for the library uses "A different idiom ... for other library features, such as the windows and cornice detailing, which creates disharmony in the facade." We firmly believe that our design for the New Foster Library is compatible with the high school, reflects its neighborhood context, maintains internal architectural consistency, and includes a multiplicity of architectural, historical, and cultural references which we hope will provide for continuing exploration and understanding by both the patrons of the library and the citizens of Tukwila. page - 5/8 9. Materials and Colors: a) We agree that the building materials selected should "be consistent with (the) anticipated life of the structure" as outline by the Tukwila Municipal Code 18.60.050. This is why we have chosen the field exterior material as a cement stucco covered with an acrylic resin finish. This type of exterior finishing on wood framed construction will provide the library system with a low maintenance /long lasting /good looking building. The use of the acrylic resin finish will allow for detailed moldings and cornices not readily constructible in other materials (this type of exterior finish material was used on the Tacoma Library Main Branch in downtown Tacoma and on the Federal Way Regional Library in suburban Federal Way).The use of a cement stucco base material over cement board provides for a durable method of construction to take the anticipated abuse from library patrons (this type of exterior finish is superior to brick /block due to its ability to resist graffiti and allow for expedient and cost effective repair/ reapplication). You reference the Foster High School as an example of appropriate materials; yet, over 75% of the exterior material on this building is stucco with an acrylic resin finish over gypsum sheathing or rigid insulation. We are providing an exterior finish equal to this system even though the high school is required to be a much higher type of construction for compliance with the Uniform Building Code (Type I1 -1 HR versus Type V- Nonrated for the library). We would also like to note that the detailing of the veneer brick elevations on the high school have only two dimensional patterns with no window moldings or articulated cornice. An equivalent quality of execution in the treatment of the library would result in a cold institutional appearance due to the reduced scale and would be contradictory to the neighboring properties (some which have stucco exteriors -none of which have brick). b) This level of detailed information is not normally developed during the schematic design phase. We will continue development and submit at the earliest opportunity. c) Building elevations, site plan, and landscape plan will be revised to show the emergency exits. d) This level of detailed information is not normally developed during the schematic design phase. We will continue development and submit at the earliest opportunity. 10. Portico: a) The portico is designed to engage the building and allow the building corners to penetrate into the portico while allowing the portico elements to be highlighted against the mass of the building elevations. Since the portico is always approached obliquely, there is no axial view down the portico West to East (only God sees buildings in true elevation). The portico is properly aligned to maintain consistency in the handling of detail and building elements. b) The curve i s designed to be subtle and the column lines do not interfere with the line of pedestrian circulation. c) The design vocabulary of the portico relates specifically to the library's context. 11. Cornices and Base: The building cornices and base are designed to relate harmoniously and proportionally with the building. The design for the cornice is not "unresolved" or "unfinished ". Further detail will be submitted as design is further developed. 12. Windows: a) The window bays are designed both from the outside in and the inside out. Their depth has been determined for both the exterior modulation and the maintaining of consistency in detailing, while providing the maximum interior alcove allowed by functional constraints. b) The windows on the east elevation are specifically designed to be different from the other windows! Please refer to previous item C 8. c) The skylight will not be seen above the roof parapet and so will not be visible on the exterior elevation drawings. A roof plan was not required on the application checklist and so will be provided as soon as available. d) Window locations will be shown on the site plan as requested (though no mention of this requirement is contained in the application checklist). page - 6/8 13. Mechanical units will be screened. A roof plan was not required on the application checklist and so will be provided as soon as available. 14. Site lighting is indicated on the schematic site plan. Detailed lighting design has not been developed yet and will be provided as soon as available. 15. A public information and display area is already programmed into the lobby of the library (please refer to Floor Plan drawing SDA -2). Landscape Plan; 16. Outdoor public spaces a) We have made every effort to include "quality outdoor areas for the public which are safe, inviting and interesting, and free from auto /bike /ped conflicts " as encouraged by the City of Tukwila and the Tukwila Tomorrow Citizens Committee. As a responsible developers, KCLS also canvassed the opinion of the neighborhood at three public meetings to discuss the library project. At these meetings, there was overwhelming concern expressed by local residents against any passive outdoor recreation areas interior to the site due to their concern, and experience with, activities by youths contrary to the health and safety of the neighborhood; thus, we have developed the outdoor spaces adjacent to both South 144th Street and 42nd Avenue South to allow 100% visibility exterior to the library site. b) KCLS has a set procedure for the commissioning, installation and maintenance of public art which can be submitted to the City of Tukwila Arts Commission for their review. In past projects, public art is commissioned prior to the development of appropriate settings and we recommend a similar procedure be adopted here to assure artwork that has meaning relative to its context. c) Proposed site furniture is indicated on the schematic site plan. Detailed design of proposals were not a requirement of the application checklist and so will be provided as soon as available. 17. We will revise the site plan to include maximizing the parking available on site (refer to previous item C 7 - Parking), thus no rear lawn will now exist. The landscape design will be revised to include perimeter screening as required by the Tukwila Municipal Code. 18. Bioswale: The bioswale was sized in accordance with current King County Washington Surface Water Design Manual as adopted by the City of Tukwila. Since we could only get 180 feet of swale (instead of 200 feet), the bottom of the swale was widened to provide equivalent treatment area. The side slopes of the swale are 3:1 (per City of Tukwila and King County criteria) with the slopes above the swale at 2:1 to accommodate the grading of the parking lot and the existing grades to the West. A bioswale is proposed in conjunction with underground storage as required by the City of Tukwila Storm Drainage Standards. We shall review the possibility of shifting the building and parking to the East to allow for "thoughtful grading and attractive landscaping." We will also indicate the proposed educational component to be included in the bioswale construction. 19. Landscape treatment: a) The curve in the forecourt planter, like the portico, is intended to be subtle to give it greater meaning. Please refer to previous items C 1, C 8 & C 10. b) The preliminary plant list indicated several choices of trees for this area. Both species of trees, the Flowering Pear and the Flowering Cherry, have attractive columnar varieties. The columnar shape of the trees would continue the "rhythm" of the entry columns and provide a visual extension and closure for the portico from the library entrance. 20. Perimeter landscaping: we will revise and add perimeter landscaping to comply with City of Tukwila Guidelines. page - 7/8 21. The landscaping around the Southeast building corner is designed to open up to the street intersection to allow views of the bay window and activities being held within. The landscaping is designed to accentuate the berm up to the window to heighten the importance of this city corner. Their is no window bay at the Northeast corner. 22. The landscaping adjacent to the alcove on the North elevation will be revised due to the shifting of the building to the North (see previous items MDNS 1 & C 1). 23. The "foundation" shrubs are shown 6' -7' from the building to help accent the slope of the proposed grading up to the building (see previous item C 21). This will also provide access around the building for ease of maintenance. 24. The choice of River Birch trees along the edge of the parking lot will be reviewed. We believe that if properly place, and perhaps pulled further back from the edge of the paving, the aphid honey dew drip will not be a problem. 25. Schematic or design development drawings do not generally show all of the specific plant choices, but give a range of possibilities. This allows the plan to be developed further as other criteria is revealed during the final stages of design. A detailed plant list with specific plant choices will be provided on the final planting plan. 26. Perimeter fencing: Plans will be revised to show extent of proposed fence (total perimeter boundary on the West and North of the site). Fence is proposed to be a constructed of cedar and be approximately 6' high. Detailed design has not been developed yet and will be provided as soon as available. 27. Grading: A critical component of the preliminary grading plan has been to balance the cut and fill calculations on site. With anticipated delay in start of construction, we will review additional cost due to anticipated import of structural fill and landscaping potential of additional native soil generated on site. 28. Lighting: Site lighting is indicated on the schematic site plan. Detailed lighting design has not been developed yet and will be provided as soon as available. 29. The location for above ground meters /vaults have yet to be determined. Detail drawings were not required on the application checklist and will be provided as soon as available. 30. All landscape areas will be irrigated, including street planting strips, and plans will be submitted for approval with building permit application as required. 31. Location of parking lot from the West property line will be revised (see previous item C 18). Street Furniture and Site Details; 32. Proposed site furniture is indicated on the schematic site plan. Detailed design of proposals were not a requirement of the application checklist and so will be provided as soon as available. Signs: 33. Site sign design has not been developed yet and will be provided as soon as available. 34. Detail drawings were not required on the application checklist and will be provided as soon as available. page - 8/8 In conclusion, we, along with our client, would like to review all of these above items with your department and all interested parties within the City of Tukwila. Due to the anticipated impact on the project schedule, we would like to schedule this meeting as soon as possible. Yours si cerel cc. Kay Johnson - KCLS Doug Blair - KCLS William Reed - ARR Stephen Wong - AA David McNeil - JGM David Dorothy - BCG David Kisler - Tukwila Library Board City of Tukwila rfLM- John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director February 14, 1994 Mr. David Boe ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD 201 I Street Tacoma, WA 98403 RE: New Foster Library, Tukwila Dear Mr. Boe: The Department of Community Development (DCD) has completed its preliminary review of the SEPA Environmental checklist, Conditional Use Permit application and Design Review application for the above project. Prior to a DCD recommendation of approval for these applications, revisions are necessary. The required revisions for each application are listed below. A. SEPA REVIEW The following corrections must be made to the application: 1. SEPA checklist needs to be signed. 2. SEPA and other approvals are for improvements shown on plans, and do not include any future improvements. On "Project Information" on plans, remove all reference to future expansion. Alternatively, you may revise project scope and drawings for approval of maximum site build - out. 3. Show existing trees on plan (approx. size & species); show trees to be retained, if any. 4. Site clearing: Has existing construction debris been removed? Has well been capped? If not, address both issues in checklist. 5. The 36" storm water detention pipe requires 54" (vs. 48 ") manholes. It is expected that the project will merit a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS). The following items are the preliminary conditions of the MDNS: 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington. 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 2 1. Right -of -way on 144th is substandard. In accordance with Tukwila Ordinance No. 1616, the property owner must dedicate an additional 10 feet of right -of -way. The City will provide the necessary forms. 2. The 6" water main on South 144th has been identified as substandard to serve anticipated future development in the project vicinity. Therefore, the property owner must sign a Water System No- Protest agreement to participate in the future upgrade of the main. 3. Design Review: As a non - residential use in a residential area, the proposed library could have adverse aesthetic impacts on the neighborhood. A public facility of this nature raises concerns regarding auto and pedestrian circulation, compatibility of building architecture with the neighborhood, screening and landscaping, lighting effects, and its aesthetic and functional relationship to the high school. To address these issues, design review by the Board of Architectural Review is required. 4. Outdoor public spaces: The Tukwila Parks and Open Space Plan encourages the development of outdoor non -city recreation facilities. In addition, the Tukwila Comprehensive Plan encourages locating public recreational facilities within easy access to residents. Based on these policies, the new library should provide quality outdoor areas for the public. The "sitting wall" at main entrance partly satisfies this goal. Plans must be revised to show appropriate outdoor seating and gathering areas (See also discussions under "Landscape Plan" and "Site Plan. ") B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -- See Design Review, below C. DESIGN REVIEW Before DCD can recommend approval of the project to the Board of Architectural Review, the current proposal needs considerable refinement. I recognize that the plans submitted with your applications were preliminary, and believe that most of these revisions your team would have addressed in due course. To clarify our expectations as to an acceptable level of quality in Tukwila's new library, the required revisions are noted below. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 3 Site plan: 1. The front "forecourt" should provide a grand entrance and appropriate processional experience to the main entry. As designed, the forecourt does not do this. It is too small, does not complement the portico, and does not provide a pleasant gathering space. It needs to be re- designed. Consider widening front steps to allow seating, extending the curved portion out to form a seating wall above the street, and using a shape which contributes to the overall design. 2. The loading and service area at main entrance is aesthetically and functionally .incompatible with main entrance. Auto, pedestrian and bike traffic will converge in this location, with probable conflicts. Revise plans to relocate these functions. Trash and recycling area should be adequately screened, per BAR design guidelines; show this on building elevation drawings. 3. The front (west) walk is a high - volume area for pedestrians and bikes. Front lawn area (northwest corner of building) may become trampled by southbound pedestrians taking short cut to entrance. Walkways at these areas should be widened to 10 feet, and /or re- designed into paved mini - plaza. 4. Due to high pedestrian, bike and auto use, driveways should be designed to minimize ped /bike /auto conflicts. Revise plan to include alternate paving materials across both driveways. 5. To clarify how the main entrance functions, show book drop location on site plan. 6. Street improvements: a) Revise plans to reflect dedicated 10' right -of- way as noted in SEPA review comments. b) Street improvements are required as part of the project. Show separated sidewalks along South 144th Street; with minimum 6' wide sidewalk and minimum 5' wide planting strip with street trees. Planting strip must be irrigated. A 6' wide curbside sidewalk is required along 42nd Avenue South. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 4 7. Parking: a) Planning Commission will determine required number of stalls. However, it does not appear that 20 visitor stalls will accommodate peak use, esp. for 70- person Multi - Purpose Room. Assuming 1.5 persons /car, minimum parking need would be 52+ (46 + 6 staff + other users). Provide additional documentation to demonstrate how peak use will be accommodated. On- street parking does not count toward satisfying minimum. b) Project info on drawings says parking stalls are 9x19 feet. Plan shows 8x19 feet; minimum for standard is 8.5' width; minimum for compact is 8' width. Revise plans accordingly. c) Show number of compact stalls. Maximum allowed is 30% of total need. Building design: 8. An important consideration of the Board of Architectural Review will be the library's relationship to its surroundings. To meet the Board criteria, the library "should be consistent with the established neighborhood character" (TMC 18.60.050). As currently designed, the library does not meet this requirement. Two key connections are missing: the library's relationship to 1) Foster High School, and 2) the larger neighborhood context. Foster High School provides the backdrop for the library. While an imitation of the high school design is not appropriate for this small library, some relationship between elements is desirable. For example, window types or materials might be repeated in the library. More importantly, the new library should reflect its setting in a low- density, primarily residential, development in a Northwest suburban community. However, the library uses Greco -Roman elements which are typically found in more urban, monumental structures. A different idiom is used for other library features, such as the windows, and cornice detailing, which creates disharmony in the facade. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 5 These elements should be refined to 1) be compatible with the high school 2) reflect the library's neighborhood context; and 3) provide internal consistency between architectural elements. 9. Materials and Colors: a) Quality materials are a critical component in the creation of a highly visible, long - lived, community facility. This was true for Foster High School. It is even more important for a smaller -scale building like the new library, where the relationship with the user is more intimate and details are more important. Use of simulated stone and sculpted simulated stone raises concerns about durability and close -up appearance of materials. In contrast, a combination of split and smooth -faced brick is long -lived and can be used to create architectural interest in the building base, reveals, and other details. The Board review criteria require that "building components...shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure" (TMC 18.60.050). Wood frame construction with dryvit and simulated stone do not provide an acceptable level of quality for the new library. Unit masonry or equivalent is highly recommended. b) Building elevations contain many unidentified lines which may /may not indicate different materials or planes. Submit drawing of building details with materials notes (e.g. column cover, column base, doors, building and portico cornices, roof, window frames, depth of reveals, etc.) c) Emergency exits (2) are not shown on south and west building elevations. Revise elevations to show exits which are appropriately designed and integrated with the building's overall architecture, site plan and landscaping plan. d) Materials board, showing proposed materials and colors for the building, is required. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 6 10. Portico: a) Portico is not centered on entrance, and west corner of wall juts into line of travel. Revise to appropriate alignment. b) Curve in portico is so subtle that it looks like an error in alignment; the slight offset of columns makes columns appear to interfere with line of travel. Portico .needs to be re- designed. c) As noted above, the design vocabulary used in the portico should relate to the library's context. 11. Cornices and Base: The roof line and base of the building should have sufficient visual "weight" to give the building the appearance of being anchored. The library cornice has a sharp, unresolved curve and appears unfinished. A close look at historical references shows cornices built up in layers to create depth and weight through detail and a solid cap. The cornice should be re- designed accordingly. Reconsider also the detailing on the cornice, which does not relate to other architectural elements. The base of the building also lacks depth and weight. It should be enlarged in proportion with the re- designed cornice. 12. Windows: a) Window bays greatly enhance building interior, exterior and the site. Deeper bays would create an inviting alcove inside the library, and give more definition /modulation to the building exterior. To achieve this, extend the two 2- foot deep window bays to a minimum of 5 feet. Individual windows added to east elevation are not in proper proportion with other windows. Their' individual cornices appear as tacked -on "eyebrows," rather than a setting for windows. These windows need to be re- designed with the same unit size and shape used in the other windows. Individual windows could repeat the idea of a panel extending to ground level, or be grouped in "bays" of two or four. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 7 c) Original proposal showed skylight over lobby. If skylight is part of proposal, show on building elevations (if visible), and roof plan (as required in Item #12). d) Windows enhance the "processional" experience of visitors entering the site, especially where the formal entry is removed. Windows also enhance nighttime appeal of the site and building. To clarify this, show window areas on site plan. 13. Mechanical units must be screened. Submit roof plan, showing where rooftop mechanical unit(s) will be located and how it will be screened. 14. Lighting: Lighting should be designed to complement building architecture and details. Revise elevations to show appropriate exterior lighting. (See also Lighting, under "Landscape Plan. ") 15. Citizens have suggested a bulletin board /display case at main entry. This could add to the neighborhood's "ownership" of the library. Evaluate the feasibility of this (cost, vandalism risk, etc.); if appropriate, designate an area on building elevations. Landscape Plan: 16. Outdoor public spaces: a) As noted under SEPA review, Tukwila policies encourage the development of outdoor recreation areas. The design of a Conditional Use must • demonstrate consistency with City policies. In addition, the Tukwila Tomorrow citizens committee envisions the area at 144th and 42nd Avenue South as the eastern "anchor" or focal point for a "neighborhood center" (TTC, 11/18/93). These focal points will be special areas in terms of their uses, pedestrian amenities and provision of public open spaces. In a community facility like the library, which will serve users of various ages and backgrounds, passive outdoor areas are especially important. The library will be used in all seasons, throughout the week, during daylight and evening hours. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 8 Revise plans to include quality outdoor areas for the public which are safe, inviting and interesting, and free from auto /bike /ped conflicts. Include seating areas, covered waiting areas, and spaces designed to accommodate future public artwork. b) Along with outdoor spaces, quality public buildings take advantage of opportunities to incorporate public artwork. Public art can include paving inlays, . sculpture which provides seating, or murals. The Foster Library has several location options: at driveways, main entrance, corner of 42nd and 144th, the north facade, etc. However, no attempts have been made to address this in the library design. Revise landscape and site plans to include interesting outdoor settings which could incorporate future public art. c) Outdoor areas for pedestrians should utilize quality materials and include appropriate furnishings, e.g. special paving for main entrance "court," comfortable seating. Submit drawing showing such details (see comments under "Street Furniture & Site Details "). 17. Rear lawn area reserved for future parking is ignored in landscape and site plans. This is very large, visible area which needs to be addressed. Revise landscape plan to include plantings, perimeter screening, sculptured earth or other treatment appropriate for a community facility. 18. Bioswale: Bioswale as shown appears to be overly large. With sides having steep 40% slope, bioswale is very unattractive ditch. Revise landscape and grading plans to show thoughtful grading and attractive landscaping. Submit section detail of revised bioswale with plantings. Alternatively, replace bioswale with equivalent underground detention, and revise landscape plan accordingly. 19. Landscape treatment at main entrance drive and forecourt is very important in "setting the stage" for experiencing the library. Proposed landscaping here does not take advantage of opportunities: Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 9 a) Curve in forecourt planter, like portico, is too subtle to have any meaning. Exaggerating the curve and /or repeating it with berming and plantings could complement the portico and add drama. b) Bosque of flowering cherry opposite the portico does not contribute much to the entrance. The curve of the bosque and habit of the trees do not relate to the portico, nor to the shape of the land. A tree species which repeats the rhythm of portico's columns, or realignment of the trees, could help this area to "read" better. Alternatively, use of simple structures (e.g. arbor or freestanding columns) could complement the portico and create an entrance "gate." 20. Perimeter landscaping: Where the site abuts residential uses, the perimeter must have adequate landscape screening. BAR review guidelines also require screening of parking and service areas. Some perimeter areas lack foundation plantings or have no landscaping. Revise plan to remedy this. 21. Northeast and southeast building corners, with attractive window bays, form important visual axes. Landscaping does not appear to take advantage of these. Revise plan to include accent trees, accent shrubs or other device to frame and define visual axes. 22. On axis with the north window bay, five trees around mini - square could act as focal point at north facade. However, the small patch of annuals in the middle of a busy path will not survive as a strong "center." This area should be re- designed to accommodate a seating area, public art or other feature which provides focal point. 23. Foundation shrubs ( "medium low evergreen shrubs ") are planted 6 -7' from building. Revise plan to show plantings adjacent to building, or clarify the underlying design intent or maintenance considerations. 24. Birch trees are attractive choice for bioswale; however, will client later have problems due to honeydew drip at parking lot? Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 10 25. Planting schedule lists several plant species per symbol. Clarify on planting schedule which plant species will be used where (e.g. whether street trees will be Raywood ash, red maple or both). 26. Perimeter fencing: Plan shows fencing in some areas but not others. Revise plan to show any proposed fencing; include detail and material. For a community building surrounded by residential uses, fencing should be of quality material and construction. Chain link is not acceptable. 27. Grading: Grading does not appear to be used creatively in the landscape, especially at north entrance, south entrance and rear lawn area. Are there opportunities to incorporate berms, or otherwise use grading to complement landscaping? 28. Lighting: Well- designed exterior lighting is essential for a safe and inviting library. Lighting should be designed to provide safe, attractive, pedestrian -scale walkways, and to accent landscaping. Revise plans to show appropriate site lighting; include details of standards and fixtures. 29. Show location of any above - ground meters /vaults. These must be screened with landscaping or a decorative wall. 30. Irrigation of all areas, including street planting strips, is required. Irrigation should be designed to conserve water; plans must be submitted for approval with building permits. 31. Landscaping plan shows parking lot at 25' from west property line; site plan shows this dimension is 30 feet. Show correct dimension in plans; make any necessary revisions in planting materials. Street Furniture and Site Details: 32. Submit details and materials for all site furniture and materials, e.g. bike rack, paving, sitting walls, benches, fencing, trash receptacles, etc.) Signs• 33. Show locations of all permanent wall and freestanding signs on site plan, building elevations. Mr. D. Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald Foster Library Preliminary Review, 2/14/94 Page 11 34. Submit detail drawings with dimensioned sign elevations and materials notes. Include materials and colors on materials board. The above comments are based on DCD's preliminary review of the project applications. Depending upon how these revisions are resolved in the design, additional comments or revisions may be necessary. However, I have confidence in your creative ideas and expertise; beyond the above refinements, no significant design changes are anticipated. I hope these comments will assist you in the next stage of'design development, where the preliminary drawings are refined to meet Board of Architectural Review standards. I would like to meet with you to discuss our comments. After you have reviewed the items listed above, please call me at 431 -3670 to schedule an appointment. Sincerel Ann Siegenthaler cc: L. Rick Beeler Jack Pace Alan Doerschel File ACRYLIC EINISII STITCD ACRYLIC FINISU STUCCO - • • . • • • • - • • ■ • _ CAST STONE MEDALLION BRICK PAINTED 'METAL - ■ ■ ._• .„• . • _ • PAINTED NIkTAL ,/i.,.. ,.. •7k:',.''././/:''..-! . ' /„, tr,', '7" -y7 -Iii-/,;.:/, 4y...,,....,,,..;.4...;.-:,;,%-r;;;;„,•:;,;:.:5:1, //,/y.,',' . ;,/i /.,,,./////; ',.:?,, ;,,,y i/,...,! .e-2 - 7 :•'‘';'; 74( :' .'i : ../,' i, -.., / ' "' I 1.7 '' / • . //' " ' o; '///;" o'', j• / ;/,,- .. • • to / / / • ..' . • • i 1 "..., .., .• , /-.• ..,. ," , • /,', / ' / / ,-• o' • (0'; 7, .1 1 ;,' • '.•,' '1 i • / ' ' / V i f,l • . • ',. ; 1i); • ti ' ' • / / . , / %•••■■ A , ';.;,,, 'q;,■'/,"'4' ty/ / ,-) / , .),!..■•14..i.. ,,, 4,1i',; 411/1//>;:4:7/.. ?;•`'.& ,•,„•; /./ • 1 , • - r1.73E ?-7)E7L: Ft 1....1R' rt 11mq tounly gycteroo / •o /, • ■11041141. C. , / ,/, ' i / // / Y,//'•''/7 /� ',- '1 / 4;'i 'i �y "7 ,/, r, , j,r r th _ .:.�_ -....-.''...'``11.„,i �.,... • rr,ir 5E;r3 Li \Inn wCUfl V Lhr•n, Syclem •TUC..ILNT N 11R11.IC I1%1S11 .U"H111V IISI91 1I1111r hll P1 el:nl SII(CO 511•110 s1H+u 111 P■111L1 I'11VT9I+ 111.111 V.11ST111 4Ci1L iUN(RCIt 1 M— i. — K— J- 0— o— c— e— 'wbmerRsrememo mmeMY MMet sW iteLMveMs toMeM1 62 M97 NYa iM] MbMRI .19310.5c54.9X5l9,00501I9MSM9M 131S3'2Gwen' + SITE P1.4.N tic MIA9(?Vt • LouI.1/41.1FLe&N(e 61.611S '� 1 I I 7 4 6 L93 -oodt 9 1• 10 tl 1 1 1 I 12 13 14 15 TIIE AMERICAS INSTITUTE OF ARCIIITECT 2654- 1 t ScAemeNe Drip Foster Library Kill CoKKty Lamy System N9wmM 29. 1993 \I:CI111LCl', I:EE1) \I E) Site Plan LOJW6fL L9J093 1.1111. SDA -1 1 wrn r -- 1.° 1 1 2 L93oo8 • B to u I PAN E PoeMATIOI.I FOSTi6. 1186.A.C1,T6.9J14A, WA GLLIIANC(1 8.2 Nt49[i U*0*70 1626 /DI•E 4.1 IIIA7l/4AI0)1. W (6A 11IA47lon 11616[2•) GONOAOQWJ 171/C V.N 71070%0 A1tl. 5,260 N 6.T •2,50014 ft 11111152. 7,750 IQ FT. 10191. A106A417. 91.411 1200 S4 ET. (60Y be) (62062 0 451961) t 1100 OTT. (147. Al) pp((LL..V� 1620 b1.5T.) 7,7604597 /m. os•etr' •) (5*1 7710.1)901 MM..* ts Sonata (111) 310/ 0 00671/6245 465/7 • 70 (0.0 6005) S7A55 0.1 4100 /00 • 4 044•0•( Vora. 1171/0 • 0 10621 1.490 6)6010 7. ; 5914 99416 110.0!451 •LALal amoaL, fj6l.L 60014 2443,0100. 6.77 9611•711701 460/40 • 0.19 01966. 614 400/400 • 1.5 110624310 1716/0 • 0 11117. 61601644 • 78 4910' NA6S 1.•4 4M •el /•;111. 11000611. 26 6011 N1i (oY 16') Mr•Hi. 5TN1S WM 2 411 mMEr a11(IY4 WN)MNl6 hl. •6[1402 4 WIN(b4 :00 Y.•T /1701••• 0• 16 &mama r0O11 AmrNM 37x4 000 0.0171••11 CAMS 46.514. NLW1461 I0 NW70L Me31. 0)9.6(64.46) 14 40.9,4 WN11(b%) 2 744 90••.60.(6.12) 6611621 MAIM (1141. Kalbamh1N1) , n6. 1.7 rnw •0 /6. 011.56[106. 4107[[) •. • MT1. AQUA • 60,020 u arm. 1.15 Aut. 10[.10 OH MKaW✓e 711041.' W16N.40 • 5,16057 M. 96•NT 1•6•40 •;7405. 17. • a•aant. 4914 Total. is,1146 W 17 • 452 50.633 . W0t61651514•6415 [140T104, taw*. rm. 2,500.4 12 &SWAT NWNI041,147p4T. FO.61ta. r1.4 TRAY 20,101 ail • 646 6Mm4 :3 14 TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCIIITECTS Mawar 04C•t) miovi 16720 m4. SoWmatle Do.ip Foster Library King Comfy Library Sy61em November 39, 6993 • E:(IIIIE( Iti RE I f) I:11\\ • \I U .111411 Floor Plan Space Plan Project Information kw 1�•11••O' 4571646 0902.1,00 �hlw514544 49, 1961 Miles SDA -2 .1 2 0 6 *Kra 1 •. .� �I \ / \ ' � \,1 \ _o r, n oe VC t._... ! ( f c 7lVIIIIINEWUMNIOa wn rN/WN, r. =! a._(�NMI{�NL�M. Vw iF/ • Nwa Meat �_ Cr1 Mum.) —• M[oU MWOrIh .._ __, MAN MMMwLi�) i jT��lj II Li, ���,�;_j�,.j- .��� {� ILU1 1 ��' ,,�� tH1 ( I1 1 ��1 /(yi. V7 E ■ t _ _` ' }If _- iT''7' i I1 4111 J t-13 tit I l — 10 - 50UTLI CLCWATION 5vUTM 144" 4TU 1 I \l \l \i \l\I \/ \1' \I \. \/ \/ \/ \1 \; \i \i \r 0 \i \/ Ai Ar .WEST CLCVATION MARKIH(r ARH..___.__._ L43 -uo88 THE AMERICAN UISTITUTEOf AIICHITECTS mos— arre..rrA.y. Foster Library Wog Canty Lamp Spam Nw sa.. b t!p DriiNq EfavaHora W W0 oZoz.t.00 l4'V fG 20 iOO! SDA -3 r. ( MI t-13 M I l - ■ 1 Ennii Irsimi 1-1 =,=�- - .WEST CLCVATION MARKIH(r ARH..___.__._ L43 -uo88 THE AMERICAN UISTITUTEOf AIICHITECTS mos— arre..rrA.y. Foster Library Wog Canty Lamp Spam Nw sa.. b t!p DriiNq EfavaHora W W0 oZoz.t.00 l4'V fG 20 iOO! SDA -3 i.1A_\1. / =1 LT r 'W T- ELZVATION Nos1■ remeteN epnoKN w«�'r` .NIRO mid IMO u• ■■ ■ • C ■ • • • MR •• Aegitagla N lw *MO • enST Et.evnnas 4;". AVENUE "QU{N L9 3 -0088 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Or ARCHITECTS b�- mos 1016! Sammele Dee* Foster Library Nig Cowly Limy Slam Normlosr 21. n11Q- D•Uiy EinaHo a 030i 1.00 °'"Waerleet zo.M3 SDA -4 • a9 4 a 4 um t. 144'N Sr Let a -ooeR PLANT SCHEDULE A.6.r. EVnAAe.0.10.00,01 NNW 10..n20 ED00.at1111jn1 iw4! R.wnn m11AA ..hIWE1w 410IBAo1 W1WI1110■000EM'10[01111■ 000v0G O w a AG.OKando "MON Rd in. WHO. CCu100x ADC. w, Part MIDI Yl17=1 IIlftaa CIPCOiwMLY JWrOW WSW IRE COW.*WM . b14 CO.000 / MAMAMMCYfEM4N.MOIM I,W."1r11rrS • FHA re011M NAITWw WOE re[ pt-e■ r+n M1i1V [l Yqr O ACER MMY 0.0041N041 AR6 4RosOII a r0.uHa 0nr4140014Y.000,04•0000AM PYMA CAllE.Y M411LOAE.NO KEM OPR0415YIII1)MEI003UEPM •.aA^f 11F IEI CRMIA tour.,A KM." uneo. MINIM LAUR 1040W04YY•01ihCh IENdThAOn. wMt11M161 C611E hYinglL IIO•AOSE Mwr.•rnrme 0 KAMA 1--1 MCA CAN. "Ant .FAU1YY MEIMN Ew a OMAR166' SIMAA1e60Nr.40(11 O VVIL.AM ORA. WV.. MAW C6Ma[h.YtR11 1:=1 atn+MUr.InIDMEaurGum mi. L`^.] C6M016MIiOOELYA8NIWt OAYLEMES TJ LA v[NO4A 04067.0W0045...[40 ("':i Cotaw,a E60A4MER<DI.1 MAIM & 6M1Y Q TW0AA N4ECpa MC1KUS ■0711.00V1Wriat - Irt1100(7NA0Y14iA U111000. A toVVM+mDSw.ua3+ WWCIIAE.m a R0. $EEmD4WW AMAIKCOLON IMO FOSTER LIBRARY KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM TUKWLA, WASHINGTON DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN OfCIAI.OI t, 1913 REED REINVALD ARCHITECTS JDNGEJAN•ERRARD4ACNEAL 23 10380 AVE N E. EELLEVUE.WA O6104 1206) 254 5723 rsii D 0 ,0 Z 7 „, Schematic Deily. Foster Library k4 Candy Lamy Sp N•6. b, 1093 Landscape Plan SDA -5 5 .i G L 1 120.: FENCE h7811.» W 4•:C1, I.E. 28141 CONTROL(( MANHOLE R 6Ei6735'a) 12' I.E. 283.65 - ... %. 36" I.E. 283.15 " • ' OVERFLOW ELEV. 286.15 // .1/ / / /'' 7. c, :4.10 N• C.8 # TYPE II 48)_ RIM 287.65 12' I E. 283 65 N 36' I.E. 283.15 S 36" I E. 28315 'L •2. to • 2e. it 287 1.2% MP B10F IL TR ATION 5wALE (5.0 005) V PO 0. 16757 F.F..288 7 _T7,_CLIP / I.E. 282.51 0.8 h T P _ILLOS 92_ RIM 267.65 I.E. 283.15 289 288 V :7 12' Cut+ 211307 e3 D: -' [ .[ •2' cu 28242 62 u 214 c .. r 1' G.7' 212 16 <_ E 12' E 2 4' 745 C u 1529, 21' 92 7 .__.. - �NEW1_C281.L8:� 74 ∎4I11320ENlI- l � �- - �- -_ i� -�®a' l < i ! 1118735'33•W S I 1 th • V 17.171 N K 51 . E 1 •2' nCu, ie14I• 8EM0YE AND REPLACE EXIST. 12' CMP (00 SLOPE) w7TH 12' CONC. 0 0750 INSTALL NEW WATER SERVICE AND METER 808 1 PER W.D. #125 REQUIREMENTS MOVE EXIST. METER BOX FOR IRRIGATION METER SSUfi e 1 Nu 221.041 PROPOSED STORM DRAINAGE FOR 42740 AVE 5 IMP807097NT5 (8Y OTHERS) 27131 e .2.1'79.-e•20 , j.7 010 !88 97 00 51 01 tut 229 e7 0 20' 40• SCALE: 1" = 20' BATS OF BEARING' EAST UNE OF 5w 1/4 15 -23 -4 BEARS N 01.2729' E DATUM: CITY OF 1UKWNA PER PACIFIC NW SURVEYS BENCHMARK: 146 -42, RR SPIKE IN SE SIDE 077171Y POLE AT NW CORNER 1461H 5T. AND 42N0 AVE S. ELEVADON 271.60' it SITE BENC7,4ARK: ' X ' IN 5W BOLT OF LIGHT POLE AT 5E QUADRANT IN7 -7 1441W 5T. ANO 47743 AYE S ELEVATION 284 79' NOTE. EX1511N5 SITE TOPOGRAPHY AND BOUNDARY TAKEN FR04 'FOSTER SITE - TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING' PREPARED BY DR. STRONG CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 1991. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 10 42ND AVE 5. TAKEN FROM PRELIMINARY PLAN AND PROFILE PREPARED FOR CITY OF TUKWILA BY PERTEET ENGINEERING DATED NOV. 12. 1993 PRELIMINARY DETENTION CALCULATIONS EXISTING CORM 11035 PERVIOUS AREA - 0.98 AC CN.86 IMPERVIOUS AREA - 017 AC 08.98 TOTAL . 1.15 AC PEAK FLOW 2 YR) - 0.24 cla PEAK FLOW 10 YR) - 047 Os PEAK FLOW 25 YR) - 0.60 <18 DEVELOPED CONDI TION5 c'ERVIOUS AREA - 0.64 AC 18.86 IMPERVIOUS AREA - 0.54 AC C74.98 TOTAL - 1.15 AC DETENTION VOLUME (25YR) MINIMUM •300 F5 - 1,042 CU. FT. USE 166 LE OF 36" 0 CuP :e. 2 1 • 4 273 e1 334,. 5 i •2'tw 2/5 ne Schematic Design Foster Library Kin: County Library System November 29, 1993 Civil Engineering Plan D PF 4 ;b.7, SDA -6 p TC 0611 t •� 1'.70' I w.. DEC 6 1923 o--.« DID to 1250101 Barrett Consulting Group o.. / .- ..",. 1w..*..'1 ,......sun KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM FOSTER LIBRARY TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PRELIMINARY SITE GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN 090 XX Of XX x8ra z ran r.vv r.DUSNC L.! 6/410 SNP Y /4 J U1� v It •..••■■G S'...5 .Gr SiA4r«p _ 1545H 0.Ca054•.l ! , \ MAws1DR.cP 1AFF LW . LIBRARY BUILDNG --NYC (MM 8 1N3WHOYIIV -c, cnctwt• oiu n• ItO .4441.04 w lrn.. , , 251872 VIED IIPPV ," SOUTH 1441h STREET DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN 42nd AVENUE SOUTH •40•.4.4.«1 50 PLANT SCHEDULE 57 0 MIMIC AL, A5sn11 NMI LONA,1•y NAN Larnay 0.K• •14 0 ec'rs1 K(•Pt,sc =r;5trynr•PrSiKVIn r.VtS Nur•nSC.,C.P.A a• R.rwty.S« s «•uls f -14,4,04142,d nnuu3 s.,n0„6P-0 c,4•.. • L nAUf C4t!•,.s. fL Owl rl..O.l•A p *544 5. • [111.1 «vewnnx•AGZt O .I.csts,r• CU,.-c,.,......15(.0ty O . tV• u.P,uurc.u,...utwl c 44..0..•.0,1,+h1A V4r.0.1.1ft«CEP () AA«pM•CW!SiC..•A.66�R hvuu ..IG CODUY.«urf C3 4PCISSVnD. f0OI (� NCDGUn.Cnhv S. r r.3CC00041 14.u5 O 1•eu54CC•t• E•5C1..,( Onn.S,RCf.•. G,Mr..v,.t•..r.q CCU.... P.K O MAAW ONIMS •u4v Dona, C••M(RPr Ius.. .4 tDG(r 11431 Iona.0« {wall 44444146. C S,aa�.F[iw,cl�IwV tAOrI IwUGGGnOgO nSK(WCCnR, nuOw �1 Ar.cuz VP , SG, P„s« O- .cwttn c•«.M«azlcrco.C,CK.an..ru• nw•u,ra *.Scwc1C•rt44t GADD«DCOVI•S: •.C5DS,..«n05 4.• u0r .ua35KwJSFnS, •f.4. 1.K• CMv.3S.ars..•CVS■CCOA000 CDtCl44.St0. D.wt•1 CCP, 1(.utt. PEARS(RR. WHOP.. IJS• 0,040. 1MUU5 f *0C0l nCTC.1ryD,«tP41.snai IC 5(1[15 CAM!' 50115(V(I NOTE, ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED. RAMP AREA ENLARGEMENT LIGI fT STANDARD 1— 0 aManny Moan nnr Foster Library I1 I - ALUMAXl SIGN PANELS /HUNTER GREEN) ACA LBE PS MONUMENT SIGN STAINED CONCRETE TUE AMERICAN INSTITUTE or � .ARf.IIITE(.Ts )004.1 R5 FOSTER LIBRARY KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD f.tFrev DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN L -1 c. Mtn FLOOR PLAN 1 yr R.,•4 1 1N3WH3V11V O REFLECTED CEILING PLAN 2 saL 14 • 1.4 MINNS CEILING TYPES woo Cara ..n ml nwwe (303 o® an 31,100 W Fn wln 0 Li LIMO na eosin MU a1)0 W on wa K34 f..�G S00 1ura a11.0*W 13330 ..nab win ■_ Kea am M. ® 3 0Kr+a 0111.011 W e �wm wun 133 Om Ca W. 11.11111 na ®man�un KLLlWi PIMA tl REED pp��R�EpE�D�,'^ REN ALD ma �. FLOOR PLAN & REFLECTED CEILING PLAN w AS IhN.ATED 29 JULY *994 97021.00 MYri A2 IMORD OTIC .as it/R1 ONORTH ELEVATION 0 EAST ELEVATION scow 0 SOUTH ELEVATION 3 1N3WHJYi1V OWEST ELEVATION sc*: v(-r-of CADO SOMA • ARCHIR REJNVAIDIL TICIS EFD NceA T Strom Ttaxen. Pftr. RCM 171.19011"" 11/4. PX) sr+.144 • ELE• VATIONS a MAWARD • 9 , 1194 $302U4 A3 .wtlD .YIA COP. KSIIC hIG SIICCO MCC SCI N St.h.0 1C.0 71431041 MO.IY wawa 100:07 own WI_ CCM 4 ONORTH ELEVATION SCALE. I /f•1' -V xtamoult S.0 CC� MC. SO w MwO .0 StlCCl a IN3WH3Vl1V OSOUTH ELEVATION SLVE: 116•1• -6 Cwto COX 00 CWC CMC IIM IS® ID fal 11.00C DO-011 -. .1010. C07 POW 10444 f RYC96.00.11 300 COOTT Da iF401ti / IL ELF W MXL1N: EAST ELEVATION Orxe ' I%t C fodne %ir4D twilw YIL C0.4 ■MC 0060 f11007 M.Y.ut 9.O.M AOwN ftMlfWl IDIDY. 00010 n.•m 07x01 au heat, 0.0 COIL ISO ACM, 0.004 ~Ma Irpm 111 I..I An.IY MW 1C.th .106 1 :•!olio: �. OWEST ELEVATION tc t 1/6.1' -6 4 us.. .Cpy1CMI0wD If-0l3 11-03 l Co. 11000 pan COOT[ OH SIM ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD D • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS ,QcTEO mot 29 MY 1994 1b91.M A5 1 ' `.lie, LMt OSOUTH ELEVATION SLVE: 116•1• -6 Cwto COX 00 CWC CMC IIM IS® ID fal 11.00C DO-011 -. .1010. C07 POW 10444 f RYC96.00.11 300 COOTT Da iF401ti / IL ELF W MXL1N: EAST ELEVATION Orxe ' I%t C fodne %ir4D twilw YIL C0.4 ■MC 0060 f11007 M.Y.ut 9.O.M AOwN ftMlfWl IDIDY. 00010 n.•m 07x01 au heat, 0.0 COIL ISO ACM, 0.004 ~Ma Irpm 111 I..I An.IY MW 1C.th .106 1 :•!olio: �. OWEST ELEVATION tc t 1/6.1' -6 4 us.. .Cpy1CMI0wD If-0l3 11-03 l Co. 11000 pan COOT[ OH SIM ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD D • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS ,QcTEO mot 29 MY 1994 1b91.M A5 0 VI\ Lill: Proposal for NEW FOSTER LIBRARY / I /[ ZAZ /94 �J 71 t40 r4 {.c'3 :[.233 1.L 23S O r U.99 AC h�� ti /0 717? 0.67 AC. ,00 ST 781. 0.85 AC JO \\ I I \\ I1 \\ I1 ,y6 \\ I 0 e 4 7.. A.E. AN\D\ERSQN -;WC. E. 1` .M n Ufa r r s 1 I P E NI foa • �1� __ -- i.so L.�4 N fJUNCl.1 I /0 ST) • S '< [-` i 6--1. r , 1'1 z 4 1 e4 `0TIrL SEAT 1 7 13 2I1IST ST h 10 14/4/ /. • 7-- c—, ,'d. s /00 g,� 3 3 /!L E. 4 TI /9/ B6 ST HUBNER BROS. 1.13 AC. n, a ELMER ROWLEY _ o 1.0 6 IQ 1 11),./ NJ ?I NrNOCS AVE) S., JL7.Y0 \ `. \\ 1 J 14135 t' IL. 279 11288 /62 S4 0 ti 7/.273 /7a:oa 6n us. 04 b {Lii1 w 1422: Q v zr /3 b ft �? O 4 A 236 ry o� 0.•1AC:J: ZS 'Y KING I I 1 • 1 • /00 7 / "TD1JNC4N17OT 60 1221• 773.94 J ATTACHMENT A I 111.;■1.1V • +s",' ::••311' r rtrrl JIM 51 1 111). Sr I $99 • II \N" C.:e1 I tsnt 51 .. .- s1 73".=-) ... I 1 R11- R 47.2 - fila t1i :al! ., 'LI III (.11- .... H.,-,777---1 cr.:1-77:77:-.7:sfzurax.-•-. 7% c-i IT2:111crT:37,,,;,:t.\ G CO SHotigErN"'"'. -SHORELINEy TRRUK0WalLAs, 1111 ....,,,,,,, \ X. \ ,.. ..:•, \ -\\. •Wisi mi ',...\\:',:\ '• (.:, \ ,-, . -•'--.-- .- \ , i/ / \ , . • , ,., /.....,k.\\ -. ii A „.. ,' :,\.'t •.; 11110, 0• \\ • ,, .1.;111.111.111.1.1_, r.:-.:. i 1111,0: E. i"::-...: - ::. i ::-.L. R-1-7.2 ..T...R _ , ...11... 71 11 .1-7,.. riTiuril ., 11017•1!■!' ...) 1 .... - '--.1 - r R-1,7 2 i .,. ,, ..:111".:17:11, g KA-7. •-•• i..;;...=.._.....,1. 1 1.0:r. Inkui ; \IIR:114j2 _ - 1 13.1.:1..ii -1 1 1_11 1 ,,, R-1-7.2 1 1 114.14.2':: ' ..____L_____.. . ...ii-....... ■40■1! 1 t -• r ' 1 Tr . IR! ;L2 tirii.;031.21 R.2 Ck I I I I . F.' I I- - 11. ; I ,,,I .-i I ii r-. lit ) . ..1 1 1 n-4 1C-2 f 0-1-7.2 pli ill); 3 ll . .. 1 i :- i ii.kiti. 6:2! ‘.:‘,...:.'41V.\ ■ . h: --- RPM' \■...1 , ..,1! . \nil svi,-.1;-1•Laj 1 -r .'c..,., ; ii.faH ' T >41 ' . •-\ . • ON M.1 '• • • 1- \ .--1111.11171 4T.1 I t I Ian 77-F3 .E. r ...., , ,-1., 2......„2„,. ,,;,, ,-,,,,,.. [,,,„„. 4 • .1. i i , ,. .; ■ 101j! %1 ' j....:_:— i L 1,.-.r. , .I ..u....i, .;..: Lii .ri''. .. r • 1.--• -41 -... 41 If ; I ...--J. 1.1. 1 . 1 C-1 C:2 I ; 1 ' I ; 1 ' R-21 1 ' •,, • 1 I i I IT 1 r 7,2 1 I A-1-7.2 , ' 4.1 R•211...1 ' , FOSTER LIBRARY Revised Entry RECEIVE JUN 2 31994 C:u ;o,w�li v: r DEVELOPMENT e 0 a Q'ItfAN Y 3ZI Q33ZI FL II 1d Jniv•EZ :SO 'fib '9Z '90 0 U) 0 (._ • :0 mo =_ n) <0 = m 6) m „r5 N3 0 10 C g 2 at Z "< m 0 (7,) a ;u pasine 1a= A= 0J Ii! 0 tuVIT-9 ARM nVCO. • PEEP icgIOALT) 2ZJIJN.Ig 1194 rn H z • • o fil 0 CONDUIT /RACEWAY SERVICE FLASHER ILLUMINATION . PE CELL __ ._....... CND _ ___ ........_ _ _ COMMENT A 0 CKRB1 CKR82 2" RCS 2•4 NNN X 2" PVC 2.8 2•8 X SEE ILLUMINATION PLAN 0 Ell 0 lag sill Q3 2" RCS 2.8 X SEE LLUMNATION PLAN 2" RGS 2.8 X SEE ILLUMINATION PLAN 2" PVC 2.8 FLASHER X 3 4' RGS 2.12 2•12 X 3 %i' RCS 2.12 X IA" RCS 2.12 X 3 'IA" PVC 2•12 X 5 is 2" PVC 2.8 X SEE ILLUMINATKSN PLAN 2" PVC - PULL WIRE• is 2" PVC 2.8 X SEE LLUNNATION PLAN 011 D3 r PVC 2.8 X SEE LLUNNAIIOK PLAN %_' RCS PULL WIRE $49.00 CD R/W 29' LT a . a uO . Al ViliffilialibrAgitt- 1164 -""'".----7"'-'..--..--t- I °Ilitilrl II:1" el I MEM" 1 A &-'fi r 1 - -' f 42ND 103.06.10 • • 44TH 50.00.00 ,..i. i � e t -�' - o o N D Bt -3 1111/fill, Nig ��Nrif 81 4 ���® At } A e % 50.55'x.:, CD 4 I II -_-- -�� .► 1 " STA 102.70 0 R/W GENERAL NOTES i i i ulu.. SEE DETY., STA 103.36 33' L T 0 I ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STANDARD PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS OR AS AMENDED BY CITY STANDARDS, THESE CONTRACT PLANS, AND SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS. I ALL MOUNTING HARDWARE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS, BRACKETS, OR BOLTS. I JUNCTION BOX LOCATIONS AND CONDUIT RUNS ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. THEY MAY BE ADJUSTED AS FELD CONDITIONS DICTATE. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR THE ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE FINAL LOCATION. SPLICING FOR THE LUMINATION CIRCUITS MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED IN THE JUNCTION BOX NEAREST THE LUMINAIRE POLE. FUSING SHALL BE IN THE POLE BASE. STA 102.76 37 'RT U.G.VAUT SIGNAL R/W -r • SIGNAL LL. I 1 $I Cot 31 INST/ PROW POLE cu0u WITH BACF (SEE INST. PRO'. POLE WITH BACP (SEE WST (NO1 EXIT PRO POLS ECEIVED BOARD OF ARCI"TECTURAL REVIEW DESIGL�..- REVIEW . DEC 10 1993 APPLICATION . REED, REINVALD CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila IA 98f 86 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: The construction of a new 5250 sq. ft. library with parking for 26 vehicles. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) NW corner of the intersection of . 144th St. & 42nd Ave. S. Quarter: sw Section: 15 Township: 2 3 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Nam : David Boe - Architects Reed Reinvald 1,0 If If P s e' ask 1 ature. * e applicant is t• whom all 206) 572 -3993; Fax 572 -1445 Date:PE/046Ft 10,10'33 rson w the staff will contact regarding the application, and ces and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY • Name: King County Library System OWNER Address: 300 Eighth Avenue,North; Seattle, WA 98109 -5191 Phone: (206) 684 -6686 I /WE,[signature(s)] William H. Ptacek, Director swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and ansvfArf,cortiiitiliis application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: December 8, 19,9.3 a_, DLL .. .0 ir�4� j D� ^ ENLOAL3p E 1. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC TION CRITERIA Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: The hui lding has hPPn 1nr-atPd nn the site to screen f]lP parkiurj and service areas from the streets, allow pedestrian access directly to the building and landscape elements. and provide an urban edge and corner in response to the adjacent high school forecourt. The scale of the building has a mix of varying sized elements to respond to both the adjacent high school and the snrrniinci i ng hnnses 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The building is nompnspd of 1 massing elements • The main 1ibi-ar'y block, the staff service block, and the entranne r•annpy_ The -•• • • • �- • • • • • • • • ng scale /uses on site. Building detail is concentrated at the cornices and fenestrations_ T.andsr.aping buffers with fpnop is dpsig*a'd to screen the adjar-Pnt prnpert i es _ Separation of pedestriaq arad vehicular circulation allows for direct access by pedestrian traffic while locating vehicle driveways at 1 hp mayimum distarv•e from street intersect i nn for safety BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ° TION Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: The pedestrian walkways have been designed to allow for two unique entrance approaches to the building - a stepped formal forecourt addressing S. 144th St. and the street intersection. and an informal level path route from 42nd Ave. S. Working with the existing contours raises the building corner to the street intersection for a prominent landscape feature. Street trees along both sides of the site are planned to continue & improve the boulevard aspects of the site. All service areas will be screened behind the building. Exterior lighting will consist primarily of sheilded parking lot fixtures on standards. Canopy & bollard lighting will be designed for pedestrian routes (minimal building • • • • - •o - • • - • n. • •o '11 • o• .s• • .s• .• -. •. • 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. .BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC TION Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: The b» U ldi r g elevations a'-e r'omposed of a *lumber of class icl elements arranged in relationship to scale & proportion relative to internal function and or site location. The corner bay window in the multi - purpose room allows views in & out to the street intersection. The rhythm of the reading room windows mirror the rhythm of the west facade of the high school, the north bay opens up for views in & out (similar to corner gesture), and the south orientation of the entrance canopy as backdrop to the front fore- court. Color is to be primarily concentrated in the detailed building cornice and rustic base. Mechanical equipment will be screened by the Parapets of the wall /cornice. Exterior lighting •- • - ••ii c- - •• 0 • 1 0• s - e • 0 - with the architecture. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: The major furniture element will be the low sitting wall bordering the forecourt. Other items will include: bike rack (located behind entrance canopy), trash receptacle, and cigarette urn AL elements are designed to .fit with the site development theme_ BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW • DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC( 'ION INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT Page 5 The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. Significant trees along the west property line are to be maintained. 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. The library is a public facility and is designed to be an inviting facility. 3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu- lation. The on -site pedestrian circulation is designed to allow direct access from both streets by separating the vehicle circulation to the perimeter of the site. 4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. The library desicgra cnmhinPg varyitg cr-alP elements arranged to reflect the different aspects of the adjoining properties (monumental high school to small single story residences). 5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im- pacts. er• effecie co r • I I • I • S • • 11' design for the storm water system. 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. The architecture for the new Foster Library is a.combination of site derived orientation and massing overlayed with a vocabulary of elements of a historical and familiar context. ""'ECEIVED DEC 101993 APPLICATION . REED, REINVALD CONDILJNAL USE CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (2066) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: The construction of a new 5250 sq ft. 1 i hra • •. •• 26 vehicles. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) NW corner of the'intersection of S. 144th & 42nd Ave. S. Quarter: SW Section: 15 Township: 2 3 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:' Name: David Boe - Architects Reed Reinvald Si A 201 N. "I" St., Tacoma, WA 98403 (206) 572 -3993• Fax 572 -1445 ature: 4 ' T to applicant is whom all .. . ces an Date: Pit, ua. 10, 1V03 hom the staff will contact regarding the application, and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY Name: King County Library System OWNER Address: 300 Eighth Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 -5191 Phone: (206) 684 -6686 ' I /WE,[signature(s)] William H. Ptacek, Director %�M:. /') swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers con;taine Lin this_. _... application are true and correct to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: December 8, 1993,.... COiViM(jNI T 'Y DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE APPI "'ATION Page 2 5. PRESENT USE OF PROPERTY: Vacant (fnrmi 1 y sing..P family rPs i dPnat i a 1 ) 6. PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE REQUESTED (from list in TMC 18.64.020): (15). Conditional use listed in the specified use districts. 7. ADJACENT North: Single family and multi- family rPsidexItial LAND South: Varant (sing1P family reGide*atia1 adjoining) USES East: Public- high srhnnl West: Single family residential ( .l)public library 8. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED USE (for example, describe the manufactur- ing processes used, wholesale /retail /warehouse functions, outside storage of goods or equipment or other information which will facilitate understanding of the activities you proposed to develop on this site): The construction of a 5.250 square foot library including a public multipurpose meeting room and parking for 26 ve_hirlps_ Sit imprnvP- ments also include a formal entrance forecourt /garden on S. 144th ate.. 9. Will the conditional use be in operation and /or a building to house the use be started within a year of issuance of the permit? Yes 10. Describe the manner in which you believe that your request for a Conditional Use Permit will satisfy each of the following criteria as specified in TMC 18.64.030.(attach additional sheets, if necessary). A. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is situated. RESPONSE: The proposed use directly replaces the existing Foster Library across 42nd Ave. S. and will significantly improve the corner property from its current state through the building and site developments. B. The proposed use shaII meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. RESPONSE: The proposed use will PXC:PPd the • u _ n - • • _ • the district through building production values, landscaping, and site amenities. • : CONDITIONAL USE APPL' ^ATION Page 3 10. (continued) C. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. RESPONSE: The proposed development specifically considers the adjacent high school design and circulation patterns, the ease & safety of both pedestrian and vehicular access, and the appropriateness of use and landscaping along adjoining properties. D. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. RESPONSE: The proposed use not only maintains the library function in the same area but also moves it to a more prominant public location to help continue S. 144th St. as a civic boulevard. E. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. RESPONSE: The design of the building. landscaping. parking and storm water system for the proposed use has reduced all possible adverse impacts on the area in which it is located. DECEIVED BOARD OF ARCI- 'TECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW DEC 1 0 1993 APPLICATION . REED, REINVALD CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3680 1. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR PROPOSAL: The construction of a new 5250 sq. ft. library with parking for 26 vehicles. 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, access street, and nearest intersection) NW corner of the intersection of S. 144th St. & 42nd Ave. S. Quarter: sw Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) 3. APPLICANT:* Name: David Boe - Architects Reed Reinvald Ad•�,-ss- 206) 572 -3993; Fax 572 -1445 i :• afore �L' ��� Date:PUiertgFi 10,1'3 the staff will contact regarding the application, and ces and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP 4. PROPERTY ' Name: King County Library System OWNER Address: 300 Eighth Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 -5191 Phone: (206) 684 -6686 I /WE, [si ature(S)] William H. Ptacek, Director ��j/,�1 ,�_ 1. swear that I /we are the owner(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answr..e�rs.contait ecd'jn�this application are true and correct to the G E. i..+ Li i— best of my /our knowledge and belief. Date: December 8, 1,9.9.3 ;:, i0Cn 4 CC. VELOPi�c.N D 5bARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW ' DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC' TION CRITERIA Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. RESPONSE: The buiiding has been located nn the site to Screen the parking and service areas from the streets, allow pedestrian access directly to the building and landscape elements. and provide an urban edge and corner in response to the adjacent high school forecourt. The scale of the building has a mix of varying sized elements to respond to both the adjacent high schoo and the si,rrntrrnding houses 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. B. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The building is composed of 1 massing elements- The mama library b ock, the staff service block, and the entrance canopy The stepping up of the building elements is in response to ng scale /uses on site. Building detail is concentrated at the cornices and fenestrations_ Landscaping buffers with fPrare is dPSi gi Pd to screen the adjacent properties Separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation allows for direct access by pedestrian traffic while locating vehicle driveways at the maxi milm cl i start, rP from street intersection for safety D dMr LJ ■r Atil:t'il i tl: i Uri/AL riC.ViEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC a TION Page3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places which tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel may be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. RESPONSE: The pedestrian walkways have been designed to allow for two unique entrance approaches to the building - a stepped formal forecourt addressing S. 144th St. and the street intersection. and an informal level path route from 42nd Ave. S. Workinq with the existing contours raises the building corner to the street intersection for a prominent landscape feature. Street trees along both sides of the site are planned to continue & improve the ' boulevard aspects of the site. All service areas will be screened 0 �1 behind the building. Exterior lighting will consist primarily of ;VA, sheilded parking lot fixtures on standards. Canopy & bollard \v lighting will be designed for pedestrian routes (minimal building • • e • -c •e- • - • u. • - • • e include a curved sitting wall and a landscaped front garden. 4. BUILDING DESIGN A. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. c U/iFiU air= titiUrii 11=1:1 UHAL REVit N DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC ' TION Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. RESPONSE: Thn hui 1 A i ng e 1 evat i or4g A.re r'nmposed of a IIumher of classical elements arranged in relationship to scale & proportion relative to internal function and or site location. The corner bay window in the multi - purpose room allows views in & out to the street intersection. The rhythm of the reading room windows mirror the rhythm of the west facade of the high school. the north bay opens up for views in & out (similar to corner gesture), and the south orientation of the entrance canopy as backdrop to the front fore- court. Color is to be primarily concentrated in the detailed (,q �) ildinq co ice and rustic base.' Mechanical equipment will be P° screened by the Parapets of the wall /cornice. Exterior lighting will be predominately downlighting with fixtures In concert with with the architecture. 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: The major furniture element will be the low sitting wall bordering the forecourt.' Other items will include: bike rack (located behind entrance canopy) , trash. receptarl e, and ci garpttP urn Al 1 elements are designed to fit with the site development theme t.),..i U Ur mt-tL;r11 1 £ .L l URAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLIC "ION T AN SP CIA ' ' IEW . I Page5 The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order to manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide incentives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the amenities including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of more people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur growth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. I. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural amenities of the area. Si•nif icant trees alone the west •ro•ert line are to be 7 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard for the use and enjoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. The library is a public facility and is designed to be an inviting maintained. facility. 3. The proposed development should provide for safe and convenient on -site pedestrian circu- lation. The on -site pedestrian circulation is designed to allow direct access from both streets by separating the vehicle circulation to the perimeter of the site. 4. The proposed property use should be compatible with neighboring uses and complementary to the district in which it is located. • - _ • - n • - - - - u - n reflect the different aspects of the adjoining properties (monumental high school to small single story residences). 5. The proposed development should seek to minimize significant adverse environmental im- pacts. E ere effecie t co r c 10 co 11 • • ! - 11 - design for the storm water system. 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. The architecture for the new Foster Library is a .combination of site • - v -• • -q . •o .o• u. •• • • . • . • elements of a historical and familiar context. MAY 16 '94 12:05 . • • FROM KING CO LIBRARY TO 9*5721445 O. 1. 9 4 1 0 : 4 :D FAGE.001 m<ARCH REED RE INVALD 1* 02 BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION 6300 South:enter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 88168 TekipItona: .(206) 431-3880 CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..2;26. .4' ' . r C." '1- er :•.:1 . •••••••• • , -• ;Air . - ...a, • A •••• '' ,,, , • " — fr.• • • '• • . - • •••• ,•.• •• •••T as, .... • • - • • '• ' • • •-• • • •..." • • c • . • , • • . . . 7: . ,t ..:A _ . " • • • — • • • • 1. MORN DESCRIBE =DR PRCWOSAL: Tha coma t ruot io A of A aaw 521 f • • : 2. PROJECT LOCATION: (Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block, and sub- division; or tax lot number, acoass street, and nearest intersection) NW corner of intersection. of S. 144th St. & 42nd Av. Quarter: SW Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4 Mk information maybe found on your tax statement) • 3, APPLICANT:* Nan-tc ____,TamaxmplaysagL-Azgaitsiattafti ,Address: 01 N. • I" st . Tacoma, WA 98403 Ph. Signitur---- 124, ?rail The app t is the person whotxt the staff will contact regarding the application, and to whom all nobs and reports shall be sent, unless otherwise stipulated by applicant. ••■••■•■■11■••■••■•••••• 206 572-3993 Fax (206-72-1445 4. PROPERTY Name: OWNER AFFIDAVIT T OF OWNERSHIP King couraty Library System Address:, 300 - 8th Ave?. N., Seattle, WA 98109-5191 Phone. ( 206 )684-6084 . • i/wEjsignatureo) William if. P - AOP ate,zrisu___4(— swear that I/we are the own(s) or contract purchaser(s) of the property involved in this application and that the foregoing statements and answers contained in this application are true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Date: mpt7 MAY 16 '9.4 11 : 39 / k 9 1gg 4 pt E v D PAY 1 61994 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P PEE . 032 . . Book now for the new Foster library Perhaps you have wondered about our new Foster Library. When will it open? What programs will it offer? What will it look like? Find answers to your questions at an upcoming public information meeting. Designs are being drawn up now for the new Foster Library at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South. Like Foster High School, the library will be an important focal point for the community. The new library will be 5,250 square feet in size, with parking for twenty-six cars. Other improve- ments planned for the site include landscaping, street trees and side- walks. At the public infor- mation meeting, draft drawings and plans of the pro- posed Foster Li brary will be on Sketch of how new library might look firm South 149th Street. display. The library architect, Tukwila Library Board and the King County Library System will also be there to answer questions and to listen to your suggestions on the library's design. In addition to the upcoming public information meeting, the Tukwila Board of Architectural Review (BAR) will review the design of the new library at a future public hearing. Both meetings will be held in the Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, and are scheduled as follows: i".rrrrd?l ,jLT7^'jr".a,: �?i F•'_fi ":'j t'"?� ;HiT'L';'t yr '''' ', :Th;K`�"i; i.77;:`X;;"-- - �;TAT�. {74 � � NF ` 1` � ' '` n .. r' t; q4 D d,.D, +.Dr�ANw:L�swiws If you have any comments on the new Foster Library design or questions about the upcoming meetings, call Ann Siegenthaler in the Department of Community Development at 431 -3670. Library Happenings Winter Preschool Stolytime 10:30 AM Thurs. through March 31 No registration required Preschool storytimes include a collec- tion of stories, puppets, fingerplays, songs, etc. The program is about 30 minutes for preschoolers, ages 3 and up. FEBRUARY 1994 African Art "Show and Do" Weds., February 23 — 4:00 PM Ages 6 -12, adults welcome to stay and help — Registration required (244 -5140) Melinda Pleshe will share weavings, masks, carved wooden combs, dolls, beadwork and dyed batiks. Then you can paint your own West African Senufo cloth using traditional animal and geo- metric designs. ome possibly good tax news for working families Did you earn less than $23,050 in your household and have a child living with you for more than 6 months in 1993? If so, you may qualify for the Earned In- come Credit (EIC). This credit, which may be up to $2,364, is subtracted from the amount of tax you owe. Even if you owe no tax, you may still get money back. You can get more information by calling the Internal Revenue Service Tax Forms/ Publications number at 1- 800 - 829 -3676 and askingfor the free publication #596, "Earned Income Credit". One -on -one tax help is available free at Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) and Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) sites. To find a location near you, call the IRS toll -free at 1- 800 - 829 -1040. Tax help for seniors Senior citizens in Tukwila can get free assistance with their taxes every Tues- day and Thursday during the month of February. Assistance will be provided at the Senior Program in the Tukwila Community Center. Call 243-5198 to set up an a appointment. Make a skills bank "deposit" Do you have a skill that you could share with a fellow Tukwila resident... bud- geting, aerobics, minor car repair, cook- ing, legal /medical advice, crafts, mentoring/tutoring, sewing, etc.? We hope to increase community involve- ment by building a "skills bank" to help Tukwila residents work together and share their knowledge. We are seeking people interested in volunteering their time to share their particular skill. Your level of involve- ment may range from a one - time -only session, to regularly scheduled sessions. For more information, or to share your ideas, call Patty Benjamin at 439 -0337 or Karen Wright at 241 -7199. 5 1993 was a busy year for human services As 1993 closed, the Office of Human Services looked back at what was a busy year. The Office received over 600 requests for information and referral on a broad range of issues such as senior services, energy assistance, housing, legal concerns, etc. Hundreds of Tukwila households were assisted through the organizations that the City helped fund. Services that were provided included homecare, home - delivered meals, health care, assistance for victims, counsel- ing, English as a Second Language, housing assistance and information and referral. A more complete description of the Office of Human Services activities for 1993 will be available soon in an annual report New human service providers for 1994 Under the 1994 Tukwila Human Services Program, several new programs will be receivingsupport in assistingTukwila residents this year. These programs are: Des Moines Food Bank — This food bank, located within the City of Des Moines, has been assisting many Tukwila families each year. Funds will be used to help purchase food not received as in -kind donations. South Park Food Bank — South Park also assists Tukwila residents with food, baby necessities and information and referral. Funds will help support personnel. Highline Hospital Primary Care Clinic— This program will offer comprehensive general health care services as a more appropriate alternative to residents seeking non - emergency care through the hospital's emergency room. King County Sexual Assault Resource Center, Renton Area Youth Services, Ruth Dykeman Children's Center — These agencies are working together to offer education and group support around the issue of child sexual abuse. They will be working closely with the South Central School District. Senior Services of Seattle /King County - Volunteer Transportation Program — This program uses volunteer drivers to help low - income elderly in King County who are without other transportation options. They can assist people in getting to medical appointments. Senior Services of Seattle /King County - Community Outreach Program — Community outreach workers will be able to visit seniors in Tukwila to assess what kinds of services they need, then help connect seniors to those services. Washington Women's Employment and Education —This organization will be working with the South Central Early Childhood Education and Assistance Program (ECEAP) to provide a job readiness training program for up to 20 Tukwila women. Childcare may be available for some families. YWCA of Seattle /King County - Work Options Program — This program will provide individual employment counseling, skill /educational assessment, job search skills, etc., for Tukwila residents. A part -time employment specialist will work in Tukwila. If you have any questions about any of these programs, call the Office of Human Services at 241 -7144. 6 .STA update In a joint Human Services- Police effort, a VISTA (Volunteers In Service To America) volunteer is working with the community to reduce drug abuse and crime. We hope to accomplish this by increasing communica- tion, cooperation and personal involvement between all portions of the community. Since 60% of our residents are renters, most of our efforts are focused on the 100+ apartment complexes in Tukwila. Asking for direction We are surveying apartment managers and tenants to give them the opportunity to identify needs and concerns. The next step is to work with these residents, allowing them to be part of the problem - solving process. We will explore ways to bring services and programs on -site at the complexes and will encourage volunteerism. Apartment tenants and managers have started to identify the programs and services that they would like to see on -site at their complexes. They have also started to come together and volunteer their time and en- ergy to make these programs happen. For example, some activities include holiday parties, family movie nights, aerobic classes, and English as a Second Language classes. We expect to see other programs develop over the next few months. If you would like more information about the VISTA project or would like to volunteer your talents, call Patty Benjamin at 439- 0337, or Karen Wright at 241 -7199. Seeking advisory board members We are seeking to establish a VISTA advisory board comprised of one member each from a business, social service provider, public sector, tenant, and landlord. For more information, call Karen Wright at 241 -7199. THE HAZELNUT City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director SPEAKING BEFORE A PUBLIC BOARD OR COMMISSION To insure that your testimony is effective and your time well spent, here are a few tips to keep in mind when you approach the podium to speak. 1. Introduce yourself to the Commission or Board and state your address. This helps the secretary keep an accurate record of the speakers at a meeting. You may also mention whom you represent, if applicable. 2. Major points in your testimony should be clear, preferably with reasons or facts to support them. Important ideas are often lost in the reading of long, prepared texts. A simple, straight - forward, and well - delivered testimony usually does the job best. Remember too that other members of the audience may also be waiting to speak. If you have a prepared text, you can summarize it, then submit the written text to the Commission or Board. 3. Like most of us, the Commission or Board members are distracted by displays of anger, personal attacks, or arrogance. You can be most persuasive by being courteous and tactful. 4. Repetition can be unproductive. If someone has already covered the points you intended to make, simply express your support for that position and give a brief summary of your feelings. 10 -22 -92 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 Fax (206) 431-3665 COMMENTS For Planning Commission 1 /we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: 1 FEEL TI-/AT wE A 2 60)kl6 ro /-1ff1/• A S,gF&-r r A2o5LF' ) WITH THE P/A127G 14.ri' Lo r rgiE4)., /c a_oi-" Tli k /Lc: C7. rig. As noss!aL± LT 51401/1, /4 5 V'/13L& 1;1201-7 T 1 H t 110/i) A NO t-1-11:- !v "LviktC 5L "r rowAa_12S rMC a /c1z_ I wovLO r o se- L /+ Sro..re £212 /Z' ( 0 >2 ? If)kTC"n,/o1Z,_ p,&/f5 - Stucce LoOI 'fS / :orz. /.9 T zt -hr. 1 -114 -C t/ /'5\ NC CO S m /200V) F oY< LomlootEo 5. Name: DJ-'17 L11/6/2. 1. Address: l 2 12 3 1 A rre S C 1 51994 CC) ji. + r17- \,If =! f, Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER III:MARY: 59 14)t," / :1 04-) ,c6/••-,-aL„(/' YIL/57/ rY,4 lac( 7q--/ •-•C 6/ • • j-ijo )1-7 „,/ ./ \ I /-- , •r /' I S't r ) yL,.t2f7 L / / )1/ 1/N2U ... LCLL. ( / ./(e 22( LED IG 47-9 ON A/ 77/'7 I ) ; / , // /.. ‘,\ ' , I - ) ,7•-• I n R, _--(_ ) H V Name: 5CO--#1 //1)(1/1 Address: /L/N Cy" 2c1 are. T6(Kku-'11.- 1 5 1991: COIVi ivi N Public Information Meeting 2/15/94., COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LJBRARY: T poke coN cr: kk) REIAALluo Jam 0 F--- TH-E_ E-&iThJq TrEes 0 J iLTRAf T-E. IQ pa: NT0A) Tt -11-11\+- ELF FoR oi/L.t) 8E, -TA i<EAJ To Tx} R IN-1-0 THE LAA/os(Aio.TA), fLAA).5) Tit/ (Lvor:/v eow ik Eat* A+ 771a. Al .ijJz) OF Ro&.o.E.REpici 11-/E A r2i 81,D6 THE: cE. (1k1:- ./.1 ..; CIO'S C7'. L\il N/ ARE-7 L- . TY E.. Aft LL)c ANI W 0 v fr-,oval \KR\ -RP;A-C)/E, gurrEtz-. Aiso -RI :-E-c A RgE 0 Lo TfE - Ae)c) 2 on iq Ri-.117:ii..11) TOL-- AJML,v YhNEiTiJQ E. 1 , P LE 5; 0411: 7- 7 c, ,f :- S0 , Loc-Atrsi) ft • -NE_ Pi-A-tZkrTA5 /IL RE PARKuvi - -0 (41 "iv 0, i1 /i< )1)Ni E g niezAdir:: LEA ve i'70pLA-c WF3:-/-ER Et) ALS 0 „4,141/ [1 ALotO -,:zvel_liarivcf 4 fRotbstE oF V1 TREE S: Lif'4tt G.\ ifAi 0 4 Name: Address: (/ f.‘ Avg:- 4."). 1 5 1994 Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: -7re a 4 m s to • h- (7ar's te)i/4 fr/k L0 ) 1-0 hi), 0 ot i.;4)0ch oir, .ve coai iler )44 / A ;-13 •/---/ 2' free/ j. rh7L r 7". r), c e GG)4(y I-71 4 1-2i jej, 7.1:7P 1 177 pbfY-e r_S Li 17 ef) 1-nptik ) a A- /4 0 1.it s7Legrit, p /hi e - p-,z) Name: ah, 1994 0 UN Address: -7///cS--- . /3 Public infOrmation.Meeting 2/15/94... - COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: (1 $ Ki P. • •6 4 r• itIrt -.7 Name: Address: Public information Meeting 2/15/94.- COMMENTS For Planning Commission 1/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: 1 6 v e (5,77'71:9 Li ). i/ J7 e- "hx_Ke._,A 7 ) h 110 ti‘.6t (C4-- e)46 14 j. e g2-4- _ (46 e /-4 •0— 1—dr-C4) 6 • irck) evi /4 ck 4eN,0e_az.-'-,e. 6-P 5'5 IAA e--- cr c3 d-41,- C (k.NA- b u1/4C7_ ctiS pp 3 b Name: .aizejc Add /5z. 5 4-107- Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. t tot COMMENTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION I /we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: 1. Materials used do not fit the Northwest landscape -- it looks like it should have been built in Georgia. 2. North facing windows in the Seattle area are fairly useless. High windows along the South side would let in more natural light. 3. Roof areas should be peaked to increase the height of the exterior but not open in the interior as in cathedral ceilings. 4. There is too much concern about Foster High School. The architect doesn't live here, the KCLS planning administrator doesn't live here. Residents are not going to think of the library as an extension of the school. S. Landscape architects operate out of a completely different mode than real gardeners -- there should be more input from a real horticultural person. 6. Current site plan is uninviting and unwelcoming -- building faces the wrong ways. 7. There doesn't appear to be enough storage in the building. S. There should be more computers and typewri ters. 9. Please see attached examples of possible charges in direction and looks for the new library. RECEIVED PIAR 0 11994 C(..4 %, ovi�NITY DEVELOPMENT .151# .a,1:1) 763- /spa COMMENTS REECE NED For Planning Commission MAR 0 7 1994 COMMUNI FY DFVELOPMENT I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: a/a., ue.4,e4 /-2/144.14.41A4) aZeeptste.oxi 61-iezel 61g, eciL tir-ett /2-ett.4.ed -ptt24 -9'ette(Zee ,kt. A4c/L eiteo _/- a.7‘ a- "Izal.14.14 ZLZ2 ,etivza4z4 ze- tAxe,a, glet 4444.- ti/te erce4 ,14_,a44,41 dteZ- 4, a 'te �h&t de46-9 -4 Zen z 1mid.J "-ed, 7;-teceat4& 6 3A4%Ou 6-% az.24_ze dzkt, 44, des& 1.44&t 0/3/u yt 64. . 2 t, ZVAz Cen41;44tz4lx-i (z7 14-pe-f1d,22a,11 71.e a-gte4 eekw/frkz. ?ea, ,241-¢4E 4,e4e, -evtze44 dtz, &L 6ts/, zeuzit 5.01-f.c., • alAe 64-cted Axteze -444A-eiczo a-cee,010 o2t ,a444-7yw der, dm_ wax4r-LT fa2 A.42_4" ge/1/2e14, .4aA42LiZei Name: a 571a,a "»z 49-e/244za da4.01 e4vt1f Ro-feJuee 7-Art-01147 Address: /.47 Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission 1/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: (.7• (7. "•••, e-55,1".'" 1"; • /.• "‘17‘171 / // 4",.57/07 / •!-7." 4,--.- ...../.41." e...":".V:."'i./...s.'."°,-. (-1' -(,;.,!':' ..• ,.,:',1 i ..., S',' ,1/5/;•7 €:-..-57•;.) /717 , .• ,44. :''‘, 7/ '''':;' - . . I I" . r''' 1." 11 i'"I' .••••"'/1 / ' ,-')/ '74.?,..-- I, ...d..7,.." ;_••7/...i" :-:.'., ..7.:' .= ..... ..--7! I p, ,./ -,/ / .,„ , e.,"''' / / .,.. I? ," • e.' / ..,. h / .,--. le 42/e.) 1.-.1 /(..21% ' ?'"- . .77,-: /1-- ...' . c.75 r' ,-/"..-',/--",,' /- .-■,.: '•"/ .4" (1 • • ,-;‘ /1 ,2- 1'• / / • • / / / / 7. .(// 1.7.5 • ,/ ■•••'" / ,../11/7 t•e"" „••••., /1) /1 f!e. I r,/ 7/// ,T7,1 (' 1.”. ."2-.),01,/ (D' ; Al/" !--"" RECFIVED MAR 2 b 1994 Name: ( CLAviiVIUNI1 Y DEVELOPMENT Address: /*/, 4/7 ) 4 /1: Public Information Meeting 2/15/94 . 1 .1. • 1 • COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: RECEIVED (auivimu DEVELOPMENT Name: Address: Pub lk Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission 1/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: Ye. r 716e- V-/e74- o7e` /)24` -q z/r./, 7L a A; 4701-e co ‘5,0,;,,, .e/2 0 c 1-5 f.."7 'f5 7et /27de /37 Aif7' 'Sive- 6f, 479-/e ‘(/.< /6 14.11 6-iczAhe-,€), Vfriviry )tW/1 ceLeW1,52-- GT-VA/At' T(Ve717e= 7-;642-,o) r 4424'76 1,997/2-cl e(,f/r/e-, e/i4/ 4ici t 7-~L" L-1 b'� oc-4 " 1)-I2-&#-1 7 7- tbi 7- , RECEIVED-- MAR 2 5 1994 Name: CumniluNITY DEVLOPMENT Address: -Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: -,re..t• vie edof u- -e /2k —ci ) 74-6 a di`opiat) r ccx L oLf) 1-7=. ,(1..pic e-i` /-/ 1- • b ) ka+- alx) 0+ a REcLivi-P MAR 2 5 1994 Name: Jo /vi R 1..;124 rot b COMMUNITY DeVELOPMPJ\IT Address: 15 2,2C ire 9g',3K-.?2,06 Public Information Meeting 2/15/94 Design plans for new Foster Library one step closer New plans for the proposed Foster Library have arrived. During the last several months, residents, City staff and the King County Library System have been working on the design for the new Foster Library at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South. New design plans will be reviewed at a public hearing on June 23, 1994. Earlier drawings and plans of the proposed Foster Library were reviewed at a neighborhood meeting in February. Residents had a lot of interest in the design and many helpful comments. Since the neighborhood meeting, the library design has changed dramatically. The original design had a classical style, reminis- cent of Greek -Roman buildings. The new design has a more modern style and different exterior materials. The Planning Commission /Board of Architectural Review will review this new design at their June public hearing. In addition, comments from the February meeting will be re- viewed at the public hearing. Prior to the hearing, you can review the design and give us additional comments. If you would like to review the new design drawings, or get more information, contact Ann Siegenthaler, Department of Community Development; 6300 South - center Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188; 206/431 -3670. If you would like to attend the hearing, and /or present your comments, mark your calendar: NEW FOSTER LIBRARY PUBLIC HEARING Planning Commission/ Board of Architectural Review Thursday —June 23, 1994 — 8:00 p.m. Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers Jaycees stencil storm drains in Tukwila's North Hill neighborhood Tukwila's Water Quality Stenciling Pro- gram was created to protect our envi- ronment by stopping the unsafe disposal of hazardous materials into storm drains. This April volunteers from the Tukwila Jaycees completed fifteen square blocks in the City's North Hill neighborhood, just north of I -405. The North Hill neighborhood drains to Gilliam Creek, which flows into the Green /Duwamish River — and ultimately to Elliot Bay and Puget Sound. Volunteers stenciled around storm drains with the message "Dump No Waste - Drains to Stream." The Jaycees felt this was both a fun and rewarding commu- nity service project. With more volun- teer help, our stenciling program can be repeated in other City neighborhoods. In addition to stenciling storm drains, the Jaycees passed out a "Home Inven- tory Guide" to each household, to help the North Hill residents responsibly use and dispose of hazardous household products. This home inventory helps you understand which products used in the home, garage and yard are hazard- ous to our environment. The guide explains how to use and safely dispose of these products. You can help reduce improper disposal of harmful wastes such as motor oil, paint, pesticides and other toxic chemi- cals being dumped into our storm water drains. If you'd like a copy of the "Home Inventory Guide," call 433 -0179. Drain stenciling is still needed in several residential neighborhoods. If you or your organization would like to volun- teer, please call Senior Engineer Phil Fraser at 433 -0179. We'll provide the materials and train you in the City's stenciling program. JUNE 1994 ' 3 City of Tukwila �.. John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director Dear Resident and Property Owner: New plans for the proposed Foster Library have arrived. Many of you have been involved in reviewing the design for the new Foster Library at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South. Earlier drawings and plans of the library were reviewed at a neighborhood meeting in February. Many of you attended and provided helpful comments on the design. During the last several months, the architects and the King County Library System have continued to revise their plans. In fact, the library design has changed dramatically! The original design had a classical style, reminiscent of Greek -Roman buildings. The new design has a more modern style and different exterior materials. The building will be 24' in height, with exterior of brick, stucco -like Dryvit in earth tones, simulated stone, and painted metal accents. The landscape plan has also been revised to save some existing trees. The Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review will review this new library design at their public hearing on June 23, 1994. In addition, comments from the February meeting will be reviewed at the public hearing. Prior to the hearing, you can review the design and give us additional comments. If you would like to review the new design drawings, or get more information, please feel free to contact me. If you would like to attend the hearing, and /or present your comments, mark your calendar for Foster Library: June 23, 1994, 8:00 p.m., City Council Chambers. Ann Siegenthaler Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila, WA 98188 206/431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 41313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a work session at 7:00 p.m. and public hearing at 8:00 p.m. on June 23,1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION 7:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0035 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend TMC Chapter 18.46: Planned Residential Development (PRD). LOCATION: City-Wide II. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0035 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend TMC Chapter 18.46: Planned Residential Development (PRD). LOCATION: City-Wide III. PLANNING COMMISSION and BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0037: Foster Library Approval of Parking Provided L93 -0089: Fostett Library Conditional Use Permit L93 -0088: Foster Library Design Review APPLICANT: Architects Reed Reinvald REQUEST: To construct a 5,250 sq. ft. neighborhood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration Swale, 6' wide curbside sidewalk and street trees. LOCATION: 4060 42nd Ave. S., Tukwila. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0036: "Best" Sign APPLICANT: Howard Turner REQUEST: Planning Commission approval of an increased wall sign area from 150 sq. ft. to 225 sq. ft. per TMC 19.32.140., and Board of Architectural Review approval of project signs per its conditions for file L93 -0091. LOCATION: 400 Strander Boulevard, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times June 10 & 17, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director CHANGE OF HEARING NOTICE for NEW FOSTER LIBRARY March 14, 1994 Dear Resident and Property Owner: The public hearing date for the new Foster Library design has been changed. The hearing was originally scheduled for March 24, 1994. However, we have had to change this date. The new Board of Architectural Review hearing is scheduled as follows: FOSTER LIBRARY PUBLIC HEARING: • Where: Tukwila City Hall, Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila • When: Thursday, April 28, 1994 7:00 p.m. Many of you were able to attend the public information meeting held in February. Your comments and suggestions were very helpful, and they will be forwarded to the Board for the public hearing. If you would like to give your comments in person to the Board, you can do so at the April public hearing. On the back of this letter is a guide to giving testimony at a public hearing. I apologize for any inconvenience cause by this schedule change. If you can't attend the meeting but have questions or comments, feel free to give me a call (431- 3670). Sincerely, Ann Siegenthal Associate Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 4313670 • Fax (206) 4313665 • • City of Tukwila • John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director THE NEW FOSTER LIBRARY Project Information: Preliminary design drawings have been completed for the new Foster Library at 4060 South 144th Street, across from Foster High School. The one -story library building will be 5,250 square feet in area, including a 500 s.f. meeting room. Improvements to the 1.5 -acre site include 26 parking stalls, new landscaping, sidewalks, and street trees. Opportunities for comment: Citizens may submit comments on the library's design in several ways: • Attend Public Information Meeting 2/15 (see below) • Send letter or call-in comments to City by 2/18 • Attend Public Hearing 3/24 (see below) At the public information meeting, draft drawings and plans will be on display. The library architect, Tukwila Library Board and the King County Library System will also be there to answer your questions and to listen to your suggestions on the library's design. The Tukwila Board of Architectural Review will review the design of the new library at a future public hearing. Below is the schedule for the two meetings: PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING: • Where: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. - -- Same - -- • When: Tuesday Thursday February 15, 1994 March 24, 1994 6:30 -7:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. If you have any comments on the new Foster Library design or questions about the upcoming meetings, you may contact Ann Siegenthaler (206/431 -3670) or mail comments to: City of Tukwila Dept. of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 • • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director January 26, 1994 Dear Resident and Property Owner: The new Foster Library is coming to your neighborhood. Plans have been drawn up to transform the vacant lot at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South into a new library. Your neighborhood has been interested and involved in other new civic buildings, such as Foster High School. Like the High School, the new Foster Library will be an important focal point for the community. We want to know what you think of the new library's design. You can bring your questions and comments about the new Foster Library to two upcoming meetings: • Public information meeting: An information meeting, in February, is intended to answer your questions and to get your suggestions on the library design. Comments received at this meeting will be forwarded to the Board of Architectural Review. • Board of Architectural Review public hearing: The Board of Architectural Review will make the final decision on the library's design. If you are unable to attend the February information meeting, you can make your comments in person at the Board's design review hearing in March. The meeting schedule is printed on the reverse of this letter. Your comments will help the library designers create a facility which best serves your community. If you can't attend either meeting but have questions or comments, feel free to give me a call (431- 3670). Sincerely, Ann Siegent aler Associate Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 NEW FOSTER LIBRARY I. CITY REVIEW PROCESS: Early conceptual meetings with staff Pre- Application meeting with all departments Application submittal: • SEPA Environmental Review (all depts.) • Conditional Use Permit (Planning Commission) • Design Review (Board of Architectural Review) Revisions with staff Public comments: • Hazelnut • Letter to residents • Public information meeting 2/15 • Quasi - judicial review: limitations on PC /BAR and Council discussion Public hearing 3/25 (PC /BAR) Revisions with staff Building permit II. DESIGN FEATURES: Project data: • Site = 1.15 acre • Building = 5250 s.f., incl. 500 Height = 24 feet • 26 parking stalls (20 visitors, • Hours: 8 am -8pm • Street improvements: Sidewalk, s.f. meeting room 6 staff) street trees Site plan: • 144th & 42nd intersection very important intersection • Bldg. located in corner to give prominence, screen parking • Entry & parking on "inside" = challenge for other sides • Relationship to north neighborhood users • Relationship to high school • Relationship of entry to 144th Building: • Small size of building • Constraints on windows • Constraints on floor plan • Materials • Entry: importance of entry • Lighting' Landscaping: • Setting for building • Framing of building • Screening of service areas • Outdoor spaces: inviting, • Public art • Details: ,paving, seating, relative to high school circulation experience via auto or ped & parking lot safe, ped /auto /bike conflicts walls, stairs BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION CRITERIA ize;�:- r;7.(; Page 2 The following criteria will be used by the BAR in its decision - making on your proposed project. Please carefully review the criteria, respond to each criterion (if appropriate), and describe how your plans and elevations meet the criteria. If the space provided for response is insufficient, attach additional response to this form. i( 1. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE TO SITE A. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping, and pedestrian movement. B. Parking and service areas should be located, designed, and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. C. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to it site. X RESPONSE: The building has been located on the site to screen the parking and service areas from the streets, allow pedestrian access directly to the building and landscape elements, and provide as urban edge and corner in response to the adjacent high school forecourt. The scale of the building has a mix of varying sized elements and materials to respond to both the adjacent high school and the surrounding houses. )( 2. RELATIONSHIP OF STRUCTURE AND SITE TO ADJOINING AREA A. Harmony in texture, lines, and masses is encouraged. _ B._. ___Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. . _ _ _ _ C. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. D. Compatibility of vehicular pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. E. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. RESPONSE: The building is composed of 3 massing elements: the main library block, the staff service block, and the entry portico. All ele- ments are unified by a continuous horizontal cornice and a variety of harmonious texture& to_.provide interest and relationship to surrounding buildings. Landscaping buffers with fence is designed to screen the adjacent- properties. Separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation allows for direct access by pedestrian traffic while locating vehicle driveways at the maximum distance from street intersection for safety. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 3 3. LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT A. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a,cfevelopment, they should be recognized and preserved and enhanced. B. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces, and other paved areas shciuld promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. C. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, str , 'ngthen vistas and important axis, and provide shade. D. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. E. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of s or shrubs in paved areas is encour- aged. F. Screening of service yards, and other places whi h tend to be unsightly, should be accom- plished by use of walls, fencing, planting or c mbinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. G. In areas where general planting will not p .spec, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone, or gravel ay be used. H. Exterior lighting, when used, should hance the building design and the adjoining land- scape. Lighting standards and fix s should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Ligh should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors sl}iuld be avoided. RESPONSE: Sae attached' sheet. . BUILDING DESIGN Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of its design and relationship to surroundings. B. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring de- velopments. Landscape and Site Treatment Response A. Existing site features retained and used in the landscape concept involve existing on- site trees which will be saved. These include a very mature American elm and an informal grouping of Red alders along the north property line which serve as an effective screen for the existing apartment building. Special measures will be required to retain the elm, including loss of perhaps an additional parking stall beyond that shown depending upon pending horticultural input. The alders can be retained with careful grading of the parking lot fill to return to existing grade in the shortest distance possible. B.A11 walkways and steps will promote safe comfortable pedestrian access to all site uses with a sure - footed sandblasted concrete surface and landscape -scale riser /tread step ratios. The sidewalk crossings at driveway entrances are marked with scored concrete and a pattern of small "buttons" to warn motorists of possible pedestrian/bicycle traffic. C. The entire landscape scheme takes as its first priority its compatibility with the architecture. Building facade features have been carefully acknowledged by shrub and tree massing. The distinctive feature of the southeast corner window is set -off with a foreground of sculptured earth and groundcover plants in- planted with Spring - flowering bulbs. The pedestrian and vehicular entrances from S 144th Street are emphasized by bosques of ornamental flowering trees. Visibility to the terracotta plaques of the east facade is maintained by careful placement of street trees and selection of shrub massing at this location. The sculpture pad at the north sidewalk is framed with an evergreen hedge containing a slot to allow passing motorists to catch a glimpse of the sculpture and perhaps the neon ceiling lighting feature within the building. The distinctive geometry of the porch is projected into the landscape by the architecture of the entry hardscape, including the concrete scoring pattern. Existing stately poplars immediately to the east inspired a careful placement of poplars in the bioswale area to further project the influence of the building geometry, to act as a backdrop and foil to direct the eye to the building and to provide a screen to /from the residential property to the west without being an imposing barrier. D. Planting areas impacted by pedestrian traffic are protected by raised seat walls and low curbs at the entrance walks. E. Planting at the west facade was removed at the City's request to provide for pedestrian traffic. F Shrub plantings at the northwest corner should adequately screen limited service and utility elements at this location. G. N /A. H. Exterior lighting will consist of shielded parking lot fixtures or standards. Canopy lighting will be designed for pedestrian routes (minimal building lighting is envisioned.) BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page 4 C. Building components - such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets - should have good pro- portions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. D. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. E. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. F. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all ex- posed accessories should be harmonious with building design. G. Monotony of design in single or multiple buildings projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form, and siting should be used to provide visual interest. 1 'U /W /4)6 X RESPONSE: This design establishes an appropriate civic presence for the library through strength and dignity of form. The civic aspect of this building is further established by three traditional al(amants• 1) The base: a low concrete wall which provides the anchor, 2) The middle: brick and acrylic finish stucco with cast stony art medal- lions, 3) The top: an acrylic finish stucco corning with distinrtive stepping over windows and the portico. The combination of the colors will be warm and friendly. The well lit portico will be generous and inviting. The window pattern is derived frnm interior function, with focal points responding to the southeast street corner and the northern art place. Mechanical equipment will be screened by cornice. Exterior lighting will be downlighting with fixtures that compliment the architecture. X 5. MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES AND STREET FURNITURE A. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architec- tural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. B. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. RESPONSE: The major furniture element, the sitting wall at the south forecourt, will also provide an opportunity for public art. This could occur as 3 dimensional busts on the wall of pionaar$,a,tthorc or others as chosen by the City of Tukwila. This is an opportunity to tell a story through art. as a story might he told through art medallions on the building. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW APPLICATION Page5 INTERURBAN SPECIAL REVIEW DISTRICT The following six criteria are used in the special review of the Interurban area in order .o'manage the development of this area, to upgrade its general appearance, to provide inc- fives for compatible uses, to recognize and to capitalize on the benefits to the area of the ameniti s including the Green River and nearby recreational facilities, to encourage development of o-e people - oriented use, and to provide for development incentives that will help to spur : rowth. Please describe how your proposed development relates to the goals for this District. Use additional response space, if necessary. 1. The proposed development design should be sensitive to the natural . enities of the area. Significant trees, particularly the large america• elm, will be retained. 2. The proposed development use should demonstrate due regard or the use and ?njoyment of public recreational areas and facilities. The design intent is to express friendliness, interest anc. a sense of invitation to this library. 3. The proposed development should provide for safe and con enient on -site pedestri an circu- lation. The on -site pedestrian circulation is de igned to allow direct access from both streets by separating the perimeter of the site. e vehicle circulation to 4. The proposed property use should be compatible withheighboring uses and complementary .to_the district in which it is located... _. The library design combines varying scale elements arranged to reflect the different aspects of the adjoining properties. (monumental high school to small single story residences). 5. The proposed development should seek to mi mite significant adverse environmental im- pacts. Energy efficient construction combined with a natural treatment design for the storm water system. 6. The proposed development should demonstrate due regard for significant historical features in the area. The building is composed in a / classical manner of a bottom middle and top. The pallate of materials such as brick and acry.ic covered stucco relate to the past as/well as present day construction methods. The entry portico, cornice, /columns and the window mullion patterns allude to both history and-the present time. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director January 26, 1994 Dear Resident and Property Owner: The new Foster Library is coming to your neighborhood. Plans have been drawn up to transform the vacant lot at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South into a new library. Your neighborhood has been interested and involved in other new civic buildings, such as Foster High School. Like the High School, the new Foster Library will be an important focal point for the community. We want to know what you think of the new library's design. You can bring your questions and comments about the new Foster Library to two upcoming meetings: • Public information meeting: An information meeting, in February, is intended to answer your questions and to get your suggestions on the library design. Comments received at this meeting will be forwarded to the Board of Architectural Review. • Board of Architectural Review public hearing: The Board of Architectural Review will make the final decision on the library's design. If you are unable to attend the February information meeting, you can make your comments in person at the Board's design review hearing in March. The meeting schedule is printed on the reverse of this letter. Your comments will help the library designers create a facility which best serves your community. If you can't attend either meeting but have questions or comments, feel free to give me a call (431- 3670). Sincerely, Ann Siegenthaler Associate Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 - NEW. FOSTER LIBRARY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING: Where: Tukwila City Hall --- Same -- Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. • When: Tuesday Thursday February 15, 1994 March 24, 1994 6:30 -7:30 p.m. 7:00 p.m. (JACK) Electronic Mail 9 -21 -1993 1:50p Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward Options Window Help I5aa Date aaaaaaaa Time Imp From aaaaaaaaaaaa Subject aaaaaaaaaa Box {NEW} aaat o Tue 9 -21 -93 1:07p DENNI WEDNESDAY. ° o Tue 9 -21 -93 12:55p MOIRA Tukwila Tomorrow Committee Tapes° eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee£ =Date: 19- Sep -93 20:31 =From: JOHN -M (JOHN McFARLAND) )*To: JACK uCopies -to: JOHN -M =Subject: Reader Board Sign =Message -id: 9CC19C2C01AEAEAE =Alan advises that Bill Ptacek informed him that you said "no -way" re: SCSD =reader board sign. nez pas? Ptacek is proceed with that understanding. =Please advise. = n eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegY Press <Esc> to quit reading. <ALT > -F -F to toggle message folding. FlHeip F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (JACK) Electronic Mail 9 -21 -1993 1:50p Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward Options Window 'Help Oaa Date aaaaaaaa Time Imp From aaaaaaaaaaaa Subject aaaaaaaaaa Box {NEW} aaat ° Tue 9 -21 -93 1:07p DENNI WEDNESDAY. ° Tue 9 -21 -93 12:55p MOIRA Tukwila Tomorrow Committee Tapes° edge.. eee eee ee eee eee ee eee eee eee eee eee eee eee e==•= eeeeeee== 'eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee£ =Date: 19- Sep -93 20:31 =From: JOHN -M (JOHN McFARLAND) nTo: JACK =Copies -to: JOHN -M nSubject: Reader Board Sign uMessage -id: 9CC19C2C01AEAEAE 1Alan advises that Bill Ptacek )*reader board sign. nez pas? )*Please advise. informed him that you said "no -way" re: SCSD Ptacek is proceed with that understanding. u )* u )* n n )* u aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegY Press <Esc> to quit reading. <ALT > -F -F to toggle message folding. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (JACK) Electronic Mail 9 -21 -1993 1:50p Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward Options Window Help ma Date aaaaaaaa Time Imp From aaaaaaaaaaaa Subject aaaaaaaaaa Box {NEW} aaat • Tue 9 -21 -93 1:07p DENNI WEDNESDAY. o Tue 9 -21 -93 12:55p MOIRA Tukwila Tomorrow Committee Tapes° eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee£ ° FILE: FROM: DATE: TYPE: WITH: C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FOSTER LIBRARY Ann Siegenthaler Department of Co unity Development October 20, 1993 In person John McFarland, Alan Doerschel, Jack Pace Met to discuss staff concerns, reach consensus and Administration, prior to Pre - Application meeting tomorrow. DCD issues: Site plan: Project "turns its back" residences. No outdoor spaces, and no desired passive park ($25,000- worth). Landscaping issues. Building design: Bunker -look. Lack detailing. No indication that high quality used (e.g. unit masonry and tile). Comments: on high school, place for City's Auto - oriented. brief of windows and materials will be Don was not able to attend; he will meet with John later. Alan believes that we may be in a tenuous position to press the Library on site plan issues. The Library seems to be pretty firm on the current plan. However, staff will likely receive support from everyone on building design issues. John assured us that Administration would support a strong staff response to the Library. He is aware that Wally has major concerns about the quality. Feels we should press the Library for an appropriate quality project (especially given the funds contributed by Tukwila). If staff needs the support, John willing to send letter from Mayor to Library reiterating the importance of a quality project. Staff will brief Administration after the Pre -App, and let John know if we need additional support from Mayor's Office. cc: Rick : .... • (ANN) Electronic Mail 10 -20 -1993 9:38a Desktop Edit Send! Record! Window Help eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed4881 166£ ) To: ALAN,DON,JACK tt ) cc: tt ) bcc: tt ) 'Subject: FOSTER LIBRARY -- Issues meeting today ) Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No tt ) Attachment: <none> tt ) tt ) tt heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddY Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp• F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (ANN) Electronic Mail 3 -23 -1994 9:12a Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward. Options Window Help ofi& Date AAAAAAa& Time Imp From $ &afia &$aaAMM Subject Aaafi &WIAA Box {NEW} WO • Wed 3 -23 -94 9:12a ANN Foster Library reschedule ° o Tue 3 -22 -94 11:34a JANE Tentative Council Agenda for Mar° 4eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee88eeeeeeeeeeeee8eeeeeeeeeeef )*Date: 23- Mar -94 09 :12 )*From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) )*To: JACK )*Copies -to: ANN )*Subject: Foster Library reschedule )*Message -id: E407902D01AEAEAE )* )* When you prepare Hazelnut notice of upcoming public hearings, please )* )*include a notice that Foster Library has been rescheduled (I would'nt specify )* )*the date yet). Stacia needs this notice by Friday March 25th. Thanks. )* )* )* )* )* )* )* heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeY Press <Esc> to quit reading. <ALT > -F -F to toggle message folding. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (ANN) Electronic Mail 3 -08 -1994 12:43p Desktop Edit Sendl Record! Window Help 60088 008088LL8080L80060L66L8688L86680e888880LL888006LLL88088841L8L88L088608I4Wee£ A To: JACK u A cc: RICK tt A bcc: tt A Subject: Foster Library n A Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No X( A Attachment: <none> n ma Message aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam. xc 0 ZToday Doug Blair of KCLS confirmed that they would like to see BAR in April. n ABlair said that some minor revisions will be made,. but KCLS will not make U many changes in materials. Sounds like we need to have John send his letter? A A nIf so, letter needs to go out 3/15 or 3/16; I have given KCLS deadline for =revisions submittal of 3/21. I am sending out public notice of hearing date =change on 3/14. tt tt tt tt tt tt tt aiseee8L88488L88L88888L8888LL8LLL84888L6e8888L8ee8L88edeeeeeeeeeeeed edeedeeeedeM Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu • (ANN) Electronic Mail 1 -19 -1994 4:58p Desktop Edit Send! Record! Window Help eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee6I810d£ n To: DENNI, DIANA- P,MOIRA,REBECCA,SYLVIA,VERNON re u re cc: n bcc: n Subject: Design Review for Conditional Uses re Importance: normal n Attachment: <none> Receipt: Yes CC- Receipt: No Archive: No 0,1 Message eaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaasaaaasaaaaaaaa� & &a &n n o Jack has researched and responded to my question about design review for n reconditional uses. Recall that proposed Foster Library is in residential n rezone, but DCD has required design review. n re re reOur "policy:" In residential zones, conditional uses which are not residentiare )should go through design review. There are no plans for a code amendment or re reinterpretation. Process: As a condition of the conditional use permit n reapproval, staff will recommend design review, and that the applicant pay n rethe design review fee. n n n rThis.is consistent with what DCD did for Foster High School. n 6.eeeeeei4eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeV Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu . ` :< (ANN) Electronic Mail 1 -19 -1994 6:03p Desktop Edit. Send! Record! Window Help 6eeeeedeeeeeededeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeddeeeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeedeedeeedeedeeeeededleWee£ n To: STACIA n cc: ALAN n bcc: n Subject: Foster Library: Hazelnut article n Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No n Attachment: <none> n n n n n n na Message aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan n n n n JStacia, n )I'm working on article & graphics (with architect) for next Hazelnut n rlregarding new Foster Library. As DCD lead on the upcoming public reviews, n nI want to ensure community is informed and that community notification n nis coordinated. If you happen to get Hazelnut submittals from others (e.g. n UAdministration? Library Board ?), please let me know so that we can coordinate.tt (Recall "too- many- cooks" problems on tree ordinance article ?). n o n n $ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegY Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (ANN) Electronic Mail 12-01-1993 12:32p Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward Options Window Help 6Afi Date fifififififififi Time Imp From fifififififififififiad Subject fifififififififififi Box {NEW} fififi� Wed 12 -01 -93 12:32p VERNON sharon ° ° Wed 12 -01 -93 11:44a DENNI FOSTER LIBRARY 6eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee£ =Date: 1- Dec -93 11:44 )From: DENNI (DENNI SHEFRIN) tt =To: ANN =Subject: FOSTER LIBRARY = =Message -id: BB83FC2C01AEAEAE =A FEW WEEKS AGO I HAD A BRAINSTORM IDEA TO SOMEHOW INTEGRATE ART =PRODUCED BY THE HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH THE LIBRARY. MOIRA SUGGESTED I =CONTACT KATHY STETSON SO THAT SHE, AS A RESIDENT, COULD FOLLOW UP WITH THE _ =SCHOOL AND THE LIBRARY SYSTEM. SHE "GROOVED" ON THE CONCEPT AND WILL PROBABLY = =BE FOLLOWING UP WITH SOME OF THE ART TEACHERS AND THE LIBRARY. I PROVIDED HER = THE NAME OF THE ARCHITECTURAL FIRM. SHE IS AWARE THAT YOU ARE THE PLANNER _ =WORKING ON THE PROJECT. SHE WILL LIKELY CONTACT NANCY LAMB (ART COMMISSION) _ AS WELL. aLeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeY ° Press <Esc> to quit reading. <ALT > -F -F to toggle message folding. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu �:� Architects for Foster Library called to say they will not meet deadline for March 24, 1994 public hearing. The two architects working on project have left the company;; principal architect Bill Reed will step in, but needs time to meet with Library Board and address our required revisions. New hearing tentatively scheduled for June 1994. It sounds like the Library is now willing to take the time to revise their proposal and improve quality. We'll see . - �'. FYI: I have meeting with architect and Doug Blair on Monday to review design issues. Interestingly, architect Ilmar Reinvald (principal) said he thought I had some valid points in my revisions letter; they have done "major re- design." (It's also curious that Blair is still involved...I thought he left) . I'll let you know how meeting went. � • Date: 28- Apr -94 10:57 From: LYNN (LYNN DEVOIR) To: ANN Subject: re: Cherry Wood Available Message -id: A096BF2D01AEAEAE In- reply -to: 4E9BBE2D01AEAEAE >Date: 27- Apr -94 15:11 >From: LYNN (LYNN DEVOIR) >To: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) >Subject: Cherry Wood Available >About three years ago the large cherry tree at Bicentennial Park blew >over. There is a large pile of wood at the George Long Shop and we >need to get rid of it. Please go down and get a couple of pieces. We would >like it to go to a variety of people, not just one or two. Please contact >Paul at 433 -1869 to arrange a time for pick up. Call him, too, if you have >any questions about the wood. We would like to have the wood out of there by >May 9. Thanks! >Date: 27- Apr -94 17:05 >From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) >To: LYNN (LYNN DEVOIR) >Subject: re: Cherry Wood Available >Lynn & Don: Thanks for the offer. Could we reserve some of it for a possible >public arts project in the future? It would be kind of neat to have high >school kids or a local artist make something out of the historic tree. >Perhaps install the artwork at Bicentennial Park, Foster Library or Comm Ctr? Great idea however the wood has dried out and is no longer usable for that type of project. ( 1%,• °' '`••. y, Electronic Mail 1 -26 -1994 12:42p 68 - ,.. 800 1 w • 11 �: • } �' ; ? ft r( = Department of Community Development F Rick Beeler, Direct= 1 •• ............. ` n.'r _ _ Sub 0' - Avenue improvements at new Foster Library = = • .....,- = Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No = = Attachment: <none> n =fi Message fifififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififififi $fififififififififififififififififififi= _ _ =Ross: _ =Hope you're feeling better. tt _ Can you tell me what specific improvements are planned for 42nd at Foster _ =Library? Will there be on- street parking? Both /which side(s)? Will there = be fixed traffic signal? Architect on site plan shows "bulge" in sidewalk at = =intersection; what is this for? Can we have separated sidewalks with = =planting strip? _ _ _ =Please let me know by 1/31/94. Thanks. _ r Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 (ANN) . Electronic Mail Desktop Edit Sendl Record! Window Help eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeggegLeegeeeeeeeeget ;ggeegeegegeeegegIeWee£ = To: JACK = cc: 0 bcc: = Subject: Foster Library hearing = = Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No = Attachment: <none> _a Message fi$$ aa$$&$ a&$ a$$$ a$$$ aaadad$ aaardtd$€ i$ daddaa $$$$$a$ad$$$a$$d$a$d$ad$daa= =Jack: I see Best project is scheduled for same night as Foster Library. _ nI understood from several of our discussions that we would not schedule =another project with the Library, given the nature /scope of it. No? Can = =Best hearing be scheduled for February? _ Xt = _ _ n aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeM Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu 1 -27 -1994 11:25a (ANN) Electronic Mail 2 -02 -1994 12:16p Desktop Edit Send! Record! Window Help e66e666L66666666666e6ee66eeeee6eee66e666ee6eeeeeee666ee6eeeee6eeeee666eeeel6We6£ re To: ALAN re cc: RICK re re bcc: re Subject: Foster Library: Meeting with Tukwila Library Board re re Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No tt ) Attachment: <none> re ma Message &&&&&&&&&& re For your information, last night I gave a presentation to the Tukwila )Library Board regarding new Foster Library proposal. I explained the City =review process (from preliminary meetings through public hearing and zt rebuilding permits); opportunities for public input; and the types of design zx reissues staff and BAR will review. re D ix The Board is very interested in the project. They had many questions and =comments; we discussed the proposed design for over an hour. Building. re reorientation, and having an inviting or "welcoming" appearance are big issues. tt re n zx n h8888e88888L08ee80L8e88e8eeee06888e8e60e88Leee8e88eL0eeee88e08e6eeeeeeeeeeeeddeY Create a new email message. <Alt -S> to send when finished composing. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu • .. (ANN) Electronic Mail 2 -02 -1994 2:55p Desktop Edit Send! Record! Window Help eL80e88ee0Le8844e88e888eeeeee08eee8ee8ee6eLe4ee848d880ee0e8ee86e808480688eIeWLL£ n To: VERNON II m cc: n bcc: n Subject: re: Zoning Implementation Notes xt O Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No tt O Attachment: <none> zc ng Message aaaaaaaaaaaaassaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaeeaaaaan z: >(i.e. a 3 -5 year maintenance contract with the installing landscape firm) n n >may be accepted and only plantings with a high probability of survival used. n 0> xx n >After several intense /controlled talks with Ron and John P., I've been 0>relatively successful on the auto irrigation front. Usually, Rick or Jack tt n >have had to be brought in to confirm my position. � n nVernon: zt Based on Rick's direction 1/21/94, Rick and Jack will not support us on this, rt . nor is John to be brought in, end of story. When new Library is delayed at n ngreat expense to King County Library System and embarrassment to the City, tt )John may ask the dept. heads to modify their positions. tt eeL88L8888888deedededgeeeeedeeee8e8Le8ee8L8eeLeee688ee8eeeeee6eeeeeee8e88eeLeeey Reply to the email message FlRelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu (ANN) Electronic Mail 2 -02 -1994 12:OOp Desktop Edit Send! Record! Window Help e66ee6eeeeeee666ee6e66eeee6eddedeeeeeeeeeeeeddeddeeeeeeeddedeeeeeeedgeeeeeIeWe6£ O To: VERNON tt cc: n bcc: O Subject: re: Zoning Implementation Notes O Importance: normal Receipt: No CC- Receipt: No Archive: No n Attachment: <none> na Message aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaatt U >and Bob will be the staff planner. m> 0 >3. Anyone needing a copy of a Truck Terminal definition should send me an n 0 >E -mail (this was sustained by the Board of Adjustment). tt tt n 0Vern: nRE': :.:.'Irrigation. We had very bad experience with Larry's Market, where BAR tt Urequirements conflicted with (6 months later) Public Works requirements. n (This continues to be a problems; next up is Foster Library. I've asked for tt ZRick's help; his response after talking with Earnst is basically, there's n nnothing DCD can do. n n tt aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedeOddeeeeeeeeeeeeee6eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeedY Reply to the email message FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu tt tt Date: 2- Feb -94 10:37 From: VERNON (VERNON UMETSU) To: ANN,DENNI, DIANA - P,JACK,MOIRA,REBECCA,RICK Subject: Zoning Implementation Notes Message -id: 7F824F2D01AEAEAE 1. Met with a developer who wanted to upgrade existing landscaping including auto - irrigation. I made sure to brief Gregg who would otherwise have ried to eliminate the irrigation and thus confuse the developer. Gregg and I are now in step for,the developer's call to him next week. om ..r.+n.ssrwn- t,,nr..x.,.wt.+..e .............._.__ This illustrates the high importance of coordinating with Public Works whenever we are deal ng with auto irrigation. They continue to discourage this practice. Att opts at resolving this issue have not been successful even with Rick and Ro =s involved. 2. Bob Betts is now hired to work on the design review, etc. for the est remodel of the Seattle Fur building. I will only be monitoring the co tract and Bob will be the staff planner. 3. Anyone needing a copy of a Truck Terminal definition should send m an E -mail (this was sustained by the Board of Adjustment). TO: Rick Beeler FROM: Ann Siegenthaler RE: PUBLIC ART IN DATE: February 4, 192 M E M O R A N D U M BACKGROUND: OPMENT PROJECTS I'm working on getting public art in the new Foster Library design. King County Library Services is not enthused. I can't find much support in our policies. Outdoor spaces (which could accommodate public art) are only alluded to in the Comp Plan and Parks & Open Space Plan. We have no policies which address public art. This led me to. questions about programs /priorities of the Arts Commission. According to Lynn Devoir, the Arts Commission has never formally adopted programs, priorities, or goals. Had they done so, I think we would have a much easier time identifying and encouraging potential arts projects in our land use reviews. QUESTION: I believe it would benefit our land use reviews to have formally - adopted goals from the Arts Commission. • Is this something we can /should suggest to Don Williams? • Or, would it be better to address in our new Comp Plan? As Director and Artiste, I'd appreciate your ideas; by 2/9/94 please. Thanks. Date:' 2- Feb -94 16:40 From: JOHN -M (JOHN McFARLAND) To: RICK Subject: re: Foster Library: Meeting with Tukwila Library Board Application -name: MHS Message -id: 7DD74F2D01AEAEAE In- reply -to: 14CE4F2D01000000 >Date: 2- Feb -94 12:17 >From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) >To: ALAN >Copies -to: RICK >Subject: Foster Library: Meeting with Tukwila Library Board >Application -name: MHS >Message -id: D5994F2D01AEAEAE >For your information, last night I gave a presentation to the Tukwila >Library Board regarding new Foster Library proposal. I explained the City >review process (from preliminary meetings through public hearing and >building permits); opportunities for public input; and the types of design >issues staff and BAR will review. >The.Board is very interested in the project. They had many questions and >comments; we discussed the proposed design for over an hour. Building >orientation, and having an inviting or "welcoming" appearance are big issues >Date: 2- Feb -94 16:00: >From: RICK (RICK BEELER) >To: JOHN -M (JOHN McFARLAND) >Subject: re: Foster Library: Meeting with Tukwila Library Board >John: >level, >design >to you. >Thanks. Please recall my earlier E -mail asking that the BAR process run its c before you send any letter to the Library Board. I believe staff can issues before a stone wall is erected by the architect. When that ha in a heartbeat. Ann, proceed as planned. The Mayor's office is prepared to support the notion of strong design review and integration of passive recreational areas, upon request from you. Thanks for the update. jm (ANN) Electronic Mail 2 -03 -1994 8:46a Desktop File Edit Compose Read! Reply Forward Options Window Help tS && Date & &&&& & && Time Imp From &&& & &&&&& & && Subject &&&&&&&&&& Box {NEW} WO o Wed 2 -02 -94 4:OOp RICK re: Foster Library: Meeting wit° o . Tue 2 -01 -94 3:59p MOIRA Shoreline ° eeeedge880L0LLLL88888Le88868e888880888ee8e8888e8L88888e8eeee8e80008806e888L888Lf tt tt UJack: tt XPer Don Williams, John wants to send a letter in next couple days to King u County Library System re: Foster Library design. We need to discuss with Johnn uprior to letter going out. u UDon.talked with John re: lack of outdoor public spaces ( "passive tt mrecreation" areas). John wants to send strong letter from Wally. We are all tt ndisappointed in library design in this respect. However, 1) there are other xt reissues of equal (or more) importance we need to discuss with KCLS; u 02) DCD has not yet had a chance to respond to KCLS on overall application; tt nand 3) so early in the negotiations, the letter might backfire. tt A u oI've explained this to Don. He suggested that we should meet with John ASAP. tt Press <Esc> to quit reading. <ALT > -F -F to toggle message folding. FlHelp F2 F3Exit F4SavposF5ConfigF6ChgUsrF7ScreenF8Block F9ExportFOMenu RATED BY: FOSTER LIBRARY INTERVIEW QUESTION RANKINGS MARCH 15, 1993 1. The design developed will be presented at a public meeting for community comment. Describe how your design team has managed the citizen input on a similar project. Firm Reed Reinvald B.N.M.R. Mithun Partners Rank 2. Describe how your design team has dealt with site planning issues for a building at an arterial intersection. Also explain how the site planning may be influenced by Foster High School. Firm Reed Reinvald B.N.M.R. Mithun Partners Rank 3. Describe your attitude towards and experience with designing projects where the Owner has established standards including adjacency requirements, equipment, furniture, finishes and /or basic floor plans. Firm Reed Reinvald B.N.M.R. Mithun Partners Rank 4. Explain your design team's cost control procedures during design and construction. What is your track record for Change Orders other than Owner initiated changes? Firm Rank Reed Reinvald B.N.M.R. Mithun Partners 5. Have the project architect explain how communications are established and maintained throughout the project between the consultant team, Owner and Contractor. Describe the form and frequency of communications during design and construction phases. Firm Reed Reinvald B.N.M.R. Mithun Partners Rank FOSTER LIBRARY ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE LIST OF INTERVIEW QUESTIONS MARCH 15, 1993 FIRM RATED: RATED BY: 1. The design developed will be presented at a public meeting for community comment. Describe how your design team has managed the citizen input on a similar project. !v /44) ana • 67.4170.:e6r4-G- G .,z7-e-�-1.17s Notes & Comments: 2. Describe how your design team has dealt with site planning issues for a building at an arterial intersection. Also explain how the site planning may be influenced by Foster High School. Notes & Comments: 3. Describe your attitude towards and experience with designing projects where the Owner has established standards including adjacency requirements, equipment, furniture, finishes and /or basic floor tans. - ��; :: /ea-i Zf� Notes & Comments: i i? �� S, _�ze 4' �f - erg /0/4 /),,.(ti �i �il/LGlCS • Foster Library Interview Questions Explain your design team's cost control procedures during design and construction. What is your track record for Change Orders other than Owner initiated changes? Notes & Comments: page2 Have the project architect explain how communications are established and maintained throughout the project between the consultant team, Owner and Contractor. Describe the form and frequency of communications during design and construction phases. Notes & Comments: FOSTER LIE3RARY FACILITIES COMPARISON OCTOBER 7, 1993 Existing New Building Area 2400 s.f. 5250 s.f. Parking Stalls 8 26 Meeting Room Capacity 49 74 Study /Tutoring Rooms 0 2 Open Hours Per Week 33 hrs. 50 hrs. Collection Size: Adult Volumes 13,250 18,000 Young Adult Volumes 1,500 6,100 Juvenile Volumes 3,700 14,700 Total Volumes 18,450 38,800 B3 PARKINGIROADWAY LIGHTING v vet :WO CUTOFF CUTOFF LUMINAIRES —Clean and simple designs that blend into the outdoor environment and illuminate with photomet- ric performance to complement buildings and sites. Luminaires are built to last with quality aluminum construction that accommodates a variety of energy- efficient H.I.D. lamps :net reflect into symmetric or asymmetric light patterns from nvdroformed reflectors. Excel• ent standards in round or square shapes for lasting per- formance and quality. 27 24 21 16 15 12 9 6 3 ARCHITECTURAL AREA LIGHTING CO. Subsidiary of Kidde, Inc./14249 Artesia Blvd., La Mirada, California 90638 F7).577.:PC ARCHITECTURE/URBAN DESIGN Institutions can help build neighborhoods MARK HINSHAW Seattle Times columnist There is an old joke in certain circles that goes like this: "India has a caste system. England has a class system. And 'America has zoning." As with any bit of biting humor, this holds some amount of painful tnith. One of the terrible legacies of the early 20th century is the notion that single-family houses must be protected, at all costs, from every other form of development. . This idea originated around the end of the 1800s when unfet- tered industrialization had resulted in numerous social ills. Back then it was not uncommon to find animal-rendering plants and steel mills cheek by jowl with the houses of people who worked there. Despite the romantic image we tend to have of the turn of the century, conditions were pretty awful. Many people died from tu- berculosis, caused or exacerbated by foul air. Drinking water was tainted by untreated human waste and chemical effluence. Separating residential land uses from industry was advanced as one way to improve human health and welfare. Eventually, this simple idea was transformed into that of placing all land uses into discrete "zones." Over the course of several decades, neighborhoods were stripped of local stores. Cottage industries were given the boot. Denser forms of housing were viewed with disdain. And institu- dons were banished to the least desirable parts of town. Ily the 1950s, single-purpose zoning was firmly entrenched in the coun- try's legal and political system. Unfortunately, our penchant for separating land uses and spreading them out across the landscape has contributed to traffic congestion, degradation of air quality, destruction of forests, farm- PLEASE SEE ilinSitaW ON G 5 CIIIEN-CIII CHANG / SEATTLE TIMES, APRIL 1993 The brick walls and high-pitched roof of the Boyer Chil- dren's Clinic fit in with the Montlake neighborhood. THE SEATTLE TIMES CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1. SUNDAY, JANUARY 16, 1994 Neighborhoods. get help from institutions Hinshaw CONTINUED FROM G 1 lands and wetlands and fiscal strife in local government. Zoning has served to reinforce the xenophobic attitudes of some people. Many local laws have been passed in the name of public health and safety, but in fact were thinly veiled attempts at racial, social or economic segregation. Even institutions with the noble purpose of providing services and care to ill or less able- bodied people have been seen as undesirable. And when built, they have been austere, antiseptic and even downright ugly, attributes that reinforced the percep- tion that they are unsuited. • • It is remarkable, then, that today any specialized institution can be .built at all within a neighborhood set- • ting. It is astonishing when such an •institution actually contributes to the .character of its surroundings. • Recently, two Seattle neighbor- hoods have been enhanced by the de- velopment of specialized institutions in their midst. The facilities arc stel- lar examples of buildings that serve both their clientele and their sur- roundings with skill, sensitivity and a high level of style. Boyer Children's Clinic The Boyer Children's Clinic on Boyer Avenue East in the Montlake • Interest rates Average national rates for 30 year, fixed rate mortgages for the past 52 weeks 9.0% Jan. 1, 1993 . R.28% area was recently re- opened follow- ing construction of a new building. Built on the site of the previous clinic, the new structure is substan- tially larger. The increased amount of floor area and state -of- the -art equip- ment allows for a full complement of programs for children with cerebral palsy and delays in development. While its interior is outfitted with comfortable finishes and furnishings, as well as wonderful artwork, its ex- terior exhibits an extraordinary "fit" with the surrounding context. The architects — originally Ibsen Nelson, who retired, and subse- quently Bassetti/Norton/Metler — employed design elements with a distinctly residential imagery. They fused together forms and materials that echo those found elsewhere in this neighborhood of stately houses. Its pitched roof form repeats the pat- tern established along the street. Even the setbacks match almost precisely those of the nearby resi- dential structures. A projecting, visu- ally prominent, "turret" completes the composition. According to Judi Moore, the ex- ecutive director, many people con- tributed money, time and energy to see that the Boyer Children's Clinic was built with a high degree of refine- ment. effort was made to assure neighbors that the new building would respect the area's character. The result is a place that is uplift- ing in spirit and a dramatic demon- stration that institutions can be an in- tegral part of a neighborhood. Bailey - Boushay House In the Madison Valley, at Madison Street and 28th Avenue, is the Bai- Iey-Boushay llouse. Designed and built to house people with AIDS, it has been open for about two years. The planning and development of this institution was at times almost consumed by controversy. While it had strong supporters, it also has a number of vocal and persistent oppo- nents. Construction began only after a settlement was reached. Now that the Bailey- Boushay I louse has been settled in fora while, it appears to have made a positive contribution to the scale, texture and diversity of the emerging district. Prior to the development of Bai- ley- Boushay, a number of commer- cial buildings were put up along the street. Most of these are pleasant, though undistinguished. The Bailey - Boushay 1 louse, on the other hand, is a finely crafted building with a land- mark quality to it. Although it has rather mundane materials — con- crete block and stucco — the building is so well detailed that it presents a graceful face to the community. Masonry belt courses anchor the building's street face, and generously sized windows are detailed like stor- efronts, repeating the pattern along Madison. The floors above read like small apartments, with a repeated ga- ble providing a symbol of home. An octagonal, cupola -like form prominently located at the corner contains a sun - filled greenhouse and 77te Lowest Rules and t3cst Scrvlce s1• With a Written l:uttranlcel YY Customer 5arlsfirdlan !tour Speclaltt•/ EXCEL. MORTGAGE Rate Shoppers Service We will Amy over. rsill L,..d,..., serves as a marker for the district, something it previously lacked. The Bumgardner Architects de- signed the building. Its interior spaces have been enriched by dozens of pieces that have been contributed by artists. The pernranent installa- tions in the lobby, by Linda Beau- mont, are powerful, layered with in- tricate texture and meaning. The architects were breaking new ground, and rules for designing AIDS facilities were virtually nonex- istent. According to Christine Ilur- Iey, the administrator, the Bailey - Boushay liouse has served as a mod- el for other facilities with a similar mission elsewhere in the country. While both the Bailey- Boushay House and the Boyer Children's Clinic are commendable on a number of levels, they are not without flaws. One of the arguments made by opponents was that Bailey- Boushay should have actual leasable store- fronts along the street. This was not done because all of the available space was needed to fulfill its princi- pal care- giving functions. l lowever, it could have made a gesture to the neighborhood by working some farm of public art into the planting area on the corner. The Boyer Children's Clinic, while containing some art, could in- corporate far more with which the children could interact. But these are minor criticisms. Both of these fine buildings remind us that we are a society and a com- munity with many different types of people, some of whom need special care and attention. PURCHASE OR REFINANCE Every neighborhood in the region should be looking for ways to com- fortably accommodate small -scale in- , stitutions such as these. As a result, we will all be better off. —G 5 Mark L. Hinshaw is a private consultant who provides urban design services to local governments. His column runs the third Sunday of the month in the Home /Real Estate section. 0 Like a breath of f air r a*y :iTz •' try - n1i '1 1l01111lE i Imagine near -acre homesitcs, peace, privacy, space... it's all yours at Wood River. Inside it's as healthy as outdoors because Honeywell's Perfect Climate" system is always at work providing a gentle breeze of clean, comfortable air. It's part of Corner's Earth .Sense Home" technology. We're building healthier homes with less environmental impact. See them S • A . n 1 at Wood River where the architecture harkens back to mountain retreats and the quality is all Conner. 1lomes from the raid S200's. WNW W0QIRIVER —NORTI 1nEND- Turn left Idol Exit 34 on 1.90 and follow the sign,. Represented by The Conner Croup, Inc. — ,gonna Notion & atlehelle stumy 1.800.199.9103 1 .. Date: 4- May -94 10:37 From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) To: DIANA -P Copies -to: JACK Subject: Foster Library architect meeting -- additional info Message -id: 037BC72D01AEAEAE Diana: The meeting with architect (Ilmar Reinvald) is scheduled for 2:00 Thursday in our large conference room. I've told him this is an informal "work session," where we can brainstorm, get out ideas on paper, and otherwise express the concerns and ideas of both staff & architect. I indicated to him that the general direction of new design seems acceptable, but that staff is uncomfortable with how elements are resolved, that facades and what he's trying to do are hard to read. I hope this meeting will get a productive dialogue going; Ilmar seems enthused about a two -way sharing of design ideas. As I said earlier, I hope you can attend. Date: 4- May -94 09:56 From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER). To: DIANA -P Subject: Foster Library architect meeting Message -id: 4971C72D01AEAEAE I am to meet with Foster Library architect to respond to the latest design direction (you saw it at staff meeting). Meeting will be Thursday or Friday. I thought it would be really helpful if you could attend, as you are good at articulating "gut reactions" in architect's language. Rick also thought this would be a good idea. I know you're very busy, but...can you /would you be willing to join the meeting? F O S T E R L I B R A R Y Example Libraries Library: Architect: Address: �� Algona Lib. �i s var/ ✓ Pele €kid kV/ r��c 1 00 P / 2W44 • Federal Way Lib. Reed Reinvald a 4 u? .5 ,i-C Parsec ails 63 8' - 3 (, 6 S7 3y .260 / at. Las s• Comments: Tacoma Lib. Portico Sumner Post Office Details /mtls • North Bend Lib. /aGo E. 16- Bassetti ORA-'b55V Lakeside School L. " g Newport Way Lib. " 7'/7-3'7j NA50 5,E, /t/ wy Woodsy Magnolia Lib. .?u.1- -;en M700 & M sw .2,/3 -36//0 e Fairwood Lib. Mithun 1e o 455 - 6g7.1 h7 So -so C.. , • • . 710 e..1,' • • - UT" S-HF,F>T-- ... . . . 6.,:::_(b/./e 'Q -frd Av. C. ro Kw! c r ) Lt. 2.t-bo Li/51-A vc., 5i. ILI:A-. q.W8.2)_ . , f r ,,» _ o /') / . , I.ep ere G'1 /7 /3 /3q_A7 /I ce-55.76e-e...4 fe- Liei2tn. S 14.) s-r- Pq7* t-0 - /3 S'A 11-i-23A LH S . 7k/Z ). 2/. 7P Tatet.0; 96'/O Tvis-vq-, tA- ARCHITECTUREIURBANDESlGN 0 � Urban village - takes .shape _i MARK !. HINSHAW Sutttle times columnist A couple of years ago, Seattle Mayor Norm Rice introduced the idea of creating "urban villages" throughout the city. This was ad- vanced as a way of accommodating additional new households, supporting public tran- sit and producing a concentration of amenities and services for sur- rounding residents. The mayor gave the term "urban villages" a fresh spin, despite its first being coined 30 years ago by Columbia University sociologist Herbert Gans. Gans used the phrase "urban village" in referring to the tightly knit weave of families, institutions and businesses found in certain Boston neighborhoods. Perhaps because it is unusual for a big -city mayor to promote a city - planning concept, the proposal has attracted considerable attention, both nationally and locally. Throughout the Puget Sound re- JIM HATES / SEATTLE TIMES The centerpiece of Bellevue's Ashwood district is the new regional li- brary which opened recently. gion, communities of all sizes are thinking about how to create urban villages. Though seemingly an oxymoron, the term evokes a gut -level re- sponse in our collective American psyche. Many of us would prefer to live in a small town like the mythical Bedford Falls of the film "It's a Wonderful Life," with its'friendli- ness, folksiness and sense of community. But few of us can actually do so, given that most jobs are found in metropolitan areas. Many of the villages designated in the Seattle plan'are places that have existed for decades. Some, like Ballard, Madison Park and Columbia City, used to be streetcar communities. These places, for the most part, already are villages. A much more difficult dhallenge is how to create a sense of village in locations where there are few existing ingredients. What do we do when there is no "there" there? Right now a new urban village is beginning to emerge in a palace where, just a few years ago, there was hardly anything at all. On the edge of downtown Bellevue, along Northeast 12th Street, a number of things stave been coming together that can give us some ideas about how to establish villages in areas that were skipped over in the post -war rush to expand into the countryside. It is also a place where the work of some of the best design talent in the Northwest can be found. The Ashwood district had been a typical suburban neighborhood of modest wood -frame houses around an elementary school. As family sizes shrank, the school was even- tually closed. Given the area's proximity to the downtown core, the city of Bellevue adopted a new set of regulations for the district that encouraged higher - density residential development to be done within a framework of design guidelines. Though for a number of years not much hap- pened, recently the area has begun to change dramatically. Much of this change has been stimulated by some key public improvements. The centerpiece of the neighborhood is the recently opened regional library built by the PLEASE SEE Hinshaw ON E 2 Interest rates Average national rates fer 30 year, fixed rate mortgages for the past 52 weeks. For more information on mortgage rates call Tire Seattle Times Infoline: 464 - 21)00, category 5000. Source: HSHAssociates November home sa Note: Only housing transactions hint Source: Puget Sound Multiple Listin,. An urban village in Bellevue Hinshaw CONTINUED FROM E 1 King County Library District. A spectacular building, it recalls the era of solid, monumental libraries that were constructed earlier in this cen- tury . Many of these still stand today as prominent and treasured landmarks, and this library promises to fill a similar role. Designed by -the firm of Zimmer Gunsul. Frasca, the library contains two grand interior spaces. One is a long, high galleria that separates the library itself from a row of public meeting rooms and allows them to be used independently. A small used bookstore at ore end is operated by the Friends of the Library. The galleria is filled with art: bold paintings by Garth Edwards, an alle- gorical relief by Rich Beyer and lights by Walter White. The library itself also contains a magnificent, multi- story central space with a grand staircase leading to the three levels of stacks and reading rooms. There are many delightful touch- es throughout the building. The area for children is a colorful collection of whimsical shapes and enclosures. Traditional, solid - looking oak arm chairs are scattered throughout. The • place is filled with nooks and crannies in which to hide away with a book. The space in front of the building is not yet finished. Now merely a lawn with a few trees, it will eventu- ally be transformed into an urban square. The design, by the landscape architecture firm of Murase Associ- ates, will include seating, water and artwork. The vacant, city -owned parcel next to the library has been reserved for a future civic building and a small, garden -like park. A broad promen- ade, half of which has been built as a part of the library project, will bisect the block. Museum of Doll Art To the northwest is a little build- ing that is startling in its intricacy and exacting detail. The Rosalie Whyel Museum of Doll Art is the work of NBBJ Architects, and it is an exqui- site example of fine exterior and interior craftsmanship. The purpose of this privately funded museum seems to cause some degree of mirth among certain people, particularly male (while a museum containing model trains, of course, would not). Those who might think this subject to be frivolous would be mistaken. This is a superbly presented collection of miniatures that demonstrate customs, clothing and manners through history. The museum also demonstrates the unexpected response that can be generated by the private sector to new directions set forth by public policy. While the library and the museum were under construction, the city was building an entirely new street. The design team for Northeast 10th Street included not only engineers but architects and landscape archi- tects. As a result, the sidewalks are generous in width and include bench- es, pedestrian - scaled lighting and decorative paving patterns. A variety of housing A hallmark of an urban village is that it includes a variety of housing for different households and income levels. In recent years, the Ashwood area has seen the development of more than 350 dwelling units, from low -rise apartments to high -rise con- dominiums. The Pacific Regent com- plex is for senior citizens and offers "life care" facilities ranging from independent living to skilled nursing. A subsequent phase is planned for the space now occupied by a parking lot. An unfortunate little glitch, espe- cially because the development is for seniors, is that a walkway from the building's front door does not quite reach the sidewalk, surely a condi- tion that needs to be corrected. Park Place, a mid -rise condomin- ium development designed by The Callison Partnership, is along North- east 12th Street. Perhaps the most urbane multiple- family project on the Eastside, it is a finely scaled and well - detailed building with shops on the street level. John and Iris Wang, recent immi- grants from Taiwan, own and operate the classy little cafe on the corner. Named "Joris," it includes a clutch of outdoor tables in good weather. The building is relatively dense (about 80 units per acre), but it doesn't look it. Its six stories are stair - stepped and capped by a cascading, sloped roof. Although the development is for high -end buyers, the project has dedicated money for moderate -in- come housing, as required by city ordinance. A few hundred feet east of Park Place is Parkridge, a cluster of four apartment buildings built atop under- ground parking. As with Park Place, . no land has been wasted on surface parking. This development will in- clude 24 units for moderate- income households. A few rough edges Despite generally thoughtful de- sign efforts, there are some rough edges. One is a rusted chain -link fence, owned by the city, that ejfjec- tively prevents people from .walljing directly between the library and le museum. Removing the fence and making a short connection couldn't . be that expensive. And there is really no reason for parking to be prohibited on North- east 10th and on 110th Avenue Northeast; there is hardly any traffic any time of the day. At the very least, parking could be permitted at night and on weekends, when the library is in heavy use. The emerging Ashwood . neigh- borhood in Bellevue is not yet a complete "urban village "; it is now more like a fragment of one. But it is a good start, considering that virtual- ly nothing was there to build on. It could use some good neighborhood stores, but they will likely come as more people move in. The planned park is sorely needed, but is waiting for funding from the city. So far, the place is shaping up as a pretty good example of what cooper- ative efforts by government and the private sector can accomplish. Mark L. Hinshaw is a private consultant who provides urban - design services to local goverments: His eohu in runs the third Sunday of the month in the Home/Real Estate section of 77w Seattle Timws. During the 1980s he was Bellevue's urban designer and participated in some discussions and decisions relating to the Ashwood District. The Bellevue City Council had established Use framework for the area before he was hired I DISTRESSED P tlITY NEWS1 YOUR PURCHASE & REFINANCE WAN SOURCE m01114.93 weatuot RATE APR 7/23 6.00% 6.47% 5/25 5.50% 6.17% 30 Yr Fixed 6.75% 7.05% WASHINGTON WHOLESALE MTG. 30 yaar,t Fixed ' . r 15 yeary Fixed RATE Apr 6'/4% 6.85 53/4% 6.66 For A look ah The 1994 Puyallup Garden Show — Iio decorating, remodelir ing exhibits Jan. 6 and p.m.; Jan. 8, 10 a.m.-9 10 a.m.-6 p.m., Weste ton Fairgrounds, Puy mission. Details: 874• In -Home Decoratin — Bring your floor pi; and have a furniture o arrangement done in sessions Jan. 10-Feb. that's awn in a while Dolben Library Northfield Mount Hermon School Northfield, Massachusetts Architectural Resources Cambridge, Architects Among the A'orlhfield School's casually scattered buildings (partial campus plan opposite), the new Dolben Library gains prominence —acrd stylistic precedent from its linkage with a tunrofthe- century gymnasium recently converted to a student center (above). 90 Architectural Record July 1990 A scholarly addendum Until 1879, when the Bible-thumping evangelist Dwight Lymer Moody founded the Northfield School, its site was a religious retreat where denizens of the region convened to revive body and spirit Today, the parklike setting, rolling from the Connecticut River valley toward the just - visible Berkshires, retains the unstudied repose of n rural haven, though Moody's summer Bible classes have given way to a preparatory- school curriculum, and the great assembly hall he raised for revival meetings now houses school gatherings. Seemingly innocent of planning, the campus is entwined with meandering roads among which its buildings dispose themselves as casually as guests at a picnic. Yet the groups and pairs and singletons engage in a common discourse spiced by the individuality —not to say idiosyncrasy — they assert within n matrix of High Victoriana. Atypically in this ensemble of soloists, the new Dolben Library was from the first conceived as an addition rather than an independent structure. The original proposal called for expanding the century-old Talcott Library and an equally outdated '50s add- on to double their capacity and accommodate new information technologies. When the school opted instead for a wholly new library on a new site downslope from Talcott, which will become an arts center, a freestanding building was again forgone in favor of close coupling with u venerable gymnasium lately metamorphosed into the school's student center. Strategically placed at a major hub of campus comings and goings, the Dolben Library also joins with Talcott and a nearby music building to lightly sketch an embryonic extra-academic cluster, reinforced by a landscaped forecourt at the elbow between library and student center. In addition, the linkage enabled the architects to confiscate from the former gym "free" space in a onetime swimming hall to house an up-to-date media center, including a 250 -seat movie theater that replaces a makeshift screening room atop the long-decked-over pool. Dolben brings to a motley campus dominated by three - and four-story edifices a low profile and horizontal sweep more reminiscent of the Prairie School than of eastern eclecticism. But it also bows to the commanding presence of its elderly Victorian sibling, whose four-square entry tower it reprises in cater - cornered, peak-roofed towers that form emphatic endpieces halting the flow of its north and south faces. Though its detailing is softened and simplified in keeping with its modest demeanor, the library also echoes the older building in its rich variegated brick cladding and ornament, and the rhythm, framing, and generosity of its fenestration. The deference, though, is more apparent than real. Actually larger than the student center, Dolben contrives to visually diminish its three stories and 26,500 square feet with a deft descent of the site's steep decline. The slope is further exploited by an interior conceived, says ARC design principal Joseph Maybeck, as "lofts within a barn." From a second-level entry, upper and lower stack floors dotted with reading rooms and study corners stairstep in long terraces made intimate by contrast with the openness of their surround — a light -filled expanse defined by a layered pitched ceiling and an outer wall from which windows and clerestories, net deep in an engaged "colonnade," overlook twin ponds below. Continuing the theme of refined rusticity, accouterments are predominantly light oak against a muted background. Barn -red and gray-blue trim, and the incidental color contributed by books and readers, brighten a milieu at once spirited and serene. Margaret Caskie A library merges gracefully with a difficult site and eccentric High l'ictorian neighbors on a New England campus. 1 Set tight against its hillside, the library's mass visually diminishes to n decorously lore profile that complements the rt•rticatily of its neighbor, whose "borrowed" entry tower provides fullstop endpieces for the new building's front and rear (opposite top) frrrades. Architeetural Reeurd July Turning the site's declivity to advantage, the library's stairstep profile reflects a layered plan that combines efficiency with expansiveness. The entry is at the second level, the building's largest, which houses the main reference room as well as administrative and work areas, and adjoins the converted audio - visual wing. At ground level, stacks ringed by study and seminar spaces adjoin work and storage areas (including the school archives) tucked into the hillside. The remaining stacks are on the upper level. iNfz'; 1111L.7 .:jtu tlGGO'1 ii:t S; wtl.„1:IGii:01PIaG11;1 ;44 :, .'ALA; Without resort to the often - exuberant applied ornament characteristic of Northfzeld's original buildings, the Dolben Library achieves surface richness through the restrained patterning of contrasting brown -brick insets and surrounds that point up ample arrays of handsomely proportioned and detailed wood framed windows. Installed to shield boolcs from sun exposure, green - tinted ultraviolet - inhibiting glass also adds subtle color echoed by muted green bands in the nzauve -gray slate roof Architectural Record July 1.988 93 ATTENDEES Ellen Ryan Tim Dunn Cheryl Brown Richard S. Simpson Jack Pace TUKWILA TOMORROW November 18, 1993 • LAND USE ELEMENT PACIFIC HIGHWAY Anna Bernhard Adele Scott Betty Gully Bill Arthur Grant Neiss Jack Scott John Welch Moira Bradshaw PACIFIC HIGHWAY Moira: At the last meeting we left off with Policy 14. I had started talking about the issue of site design and circulation. We were talking about how parking 1,,,_ placement and setbacks should be different along the corridor to emphasize a Center versus an automobile oriented area. That's when it was suggested to create a heart, to know when you are at the center of a neighborhood. That's where we left off. There was also a request to go back to policy 12 as well. Have you marked which policies you had questions on? Should we go ahead and list them? Do you want to check that at the next meeting and run through them as we have historically at this meeting? Agreement. Site Design and Circulation Policy 14: Design and combine parking placement and setback /build to standards to achieve: - concept of contrast between compact center and low rise linear corridor, - consistent street wall in both areas, and - pedestrian attraction. Moira: My impression of what was being discussed last time, was that you didn't think that having buildings and activities along the street corridor would create a sense of arrival and place . at the intersection of 144th and 99. November 18, 1993. Page 2 Comment: I think you could do special treatments like cobblestone which would give a sense of arrival. I wasn't clear as to exactly what was being imagined to be done. Cominent: I think that's what was being discussed. Not having the buildings come up and make it be a square corner, but cut back. Moira: Your options are to have parking or a building in the area, or a plaza. As we mentioned, there is only so much area on, these blocks. How big the plaza should be, is the question. Question: Why can't you terrace it as you go up so it opens it up? Moira: I'm not sure if Bill was completely against the idea of a building here. Comment: I thought he was against squaring the buildings right up to the curb. Comment: I think we should address the idea of having a center feeling with some sort of treatment, something to make you feel that you are at the center. Moira: So the suggestion is that we have a policy under design review that talks about achieving a sense of being in the center of town. Comment: If we haphazardly place some buildings back and others forward, we get a "junky" look. Moira: I think the thought that everybody agrees upon is that the improvements to this area should relay that this is the center of the residential neighborhood, this is the neighborhood center. We can have a policy on that. Comment: Not just that intersection, it needs to run down and include the area of the high school also. Comment: You said the parking was in direct conflict with the open space concept. The parking lot at Larry's Market gives a feeling of openness. The landscaping has a very pleasing effect. I don't know that parking is necessarily bad, it is harmonious with the open feeling. Moira: The idea that is trying to be expressed here, is to convey a sense of arriving, a heart of a neighborhood, an area. That means that something different occurs here than elsewhere on 99. A way of doing that is by doing something different with the placement of your buildings. Actually using the buildings as a means of conveying that difference. Also, we have said that from here south it's .'(ovember 18, 1993 Page 3 sense of the activity and that there are businesses that are there. It's that contrast that's being suggested for this area as a means of distinguishing it. We have a policy under projects that says, "Tukwila shall improve 144th between 37th and 42nd including right -of -way acquisition." There has been a good suggestion to add a policy regarding the design of the structures to include pedestrian amenities. If you agree that buildings are appropriate in this area versus a parking lot, then a suggestion of a policy on the treatment of these buildings would be appropriate under design review. Question: So policy 14 is saying that it should be close zero setbacks with parking along side or behind? Moira: And that there ought to be something different elsewhere - in the mixed use, regional section of the corridor. Question: How would we really achieve this? Over many many years? Moira: Yes, anything that will happen there, will be achieved over time. Comment: You can't impose anything on anybody until they've decided to redevelop. Question: I am not opposed to this, but can we really get there from here considering what we have? Comment: We talked last week about backing everything up both from the street and the intersection, instead of squishing everything and looking at just the intersection. Use the new .Foster High and the new Larry's Market to build from, and make that your parameters of this new town square. Dandy's and the motel are likely candidates for redevelopment, which is the whole east side of 99. The things that will get in your way are the things that aren't there yet, specifically the new library. That may not be the best location for that library if you adopt a concept like this. Moira: The City of Tukwila made a choice to keep two separate libraries. There can only be so much square footage for each location. Comment: Until its built you can still resite it. Comment: I don't understand why its wrong for that location. November 18, 1993 Page 4 Comment: Because it is so tiny, it makes it hard to do something for the whole area. Comment: I think the road is too narrow to the east. Moira: Why do you think its too narrow? Comment: You have limited site, the motel comes right up to the corner. There are people walking on a small sidewalk, barely enough room for the cars. Moira: We have the suggestion that it be opened, that there be acquisition of a right -of -way and a pedestrian corridor which would mean at least a ten foot sidewalk. Comment: There's a chance, if you really want to make a statement, that you could do one of those loops like you have in some towns elsewhere. At least you could identify this as an area; something unique in Tukwila. Question: If you were going to take the library out of there, what would you suggest to replace it with? Comment: There are two neat things going on there with the high school and Larry's Market. If you could widen the area there, I'm not sure you would want anything. Comment: Further north on 42nd, this committee was quite adamant about leaving a buffer zone between the business section and the people across the street. To me that library would be an ideal use for a buffer zone. Moira: If you do something grander and more public here, then you would be eliminating some of the existing commercial and residential lots. This whole area would be commercial on the ground floor, then residential as you go up. One of the things people will want when they develop, is enough land. These lots, as were mentioned in the report, were plated for single family lots. That happened before the 1920's. One point that the economic consultant made was that there's a lot of little lots, a lot of ownership. To get redevelopment you will have to provide more area for some of the lots and /or they will have to be consolidated. That is a different concept. The point that has been made is, do we do something more public instead of relying on private investment? Comment: I don't agree with that. I don't think you necessarily need to acquire property from the developer using certain design standards. �((ovember 18, 1993 Page 5 Moira: You said that the area would be open, how can you do that without buying .property? Comment: You do it like they do it in Bellevue. They impose design standards on developers and in exchange they can go up higher. At One Bellevue Center, there was not additional acquisition of right -of -way other than for the street. You will find that the corners are inset, approximately 35 feet. It is not a public area, it remains in private ownership, but you do have a park . like setting with steps. Moira: So what I see then is to continue to use buildings to create the sense of a center, but to treat the buildings such that you get significant public areas along the street frontage and 144th. Comment: When you think about it, practically every intersection is. Look at the transit center and the Cole Center building. Look at the Hyatt, they allowed retail right up to the sidewalk, and then an open space in the form of a circular plaza drive through pedestrian area, where the hotel meets the office buildings. Comment: Last week I was trying to portray that concept by describing buildings downtown. You said the difference with that is that in downtown they can go up really high and make up the difference. I like this concept, can it be done? . .. Comment: As you go further over the hill towards the freeway the floor -area ratio wasn't a consideration. They have more park down there and they have it on both sides. Moira: This is a great idea, but I think there is a quantitative aspect to this of how grand is going to be grand enough. You need to do some more imaging of exactly what that means, so that when someone comes in to design a project your intentions are clear. Economically I am not sure of the amount of area that's devoted to these public spaces and the amount left within the block to put in enough building square footage to do something feasible. That is something we will be doing more analysis on. Comment: There is one thing when you picture a building. On the first floor there is a lot of open space and setback. When you get up to the second floor, the floor plate from street level, then you go back to regular size. Moira: Are you saying to cantilever over? Comment: Not all the way to the corner, just over the plaza area. ' November 18, 1993 Page 6 Comment: In the buildings downtown they used a lot of glass on the lower section. Some of them are out, the corner is cut off. You get the illusion of being open. Comment: I think we are in agreement that we want it to have a sense of a town center, a sense of center. There have been a variety of suggestions of ways to get there. What could we say in our policy that would address the things we talked about? Moira: • I would suggest that under policies on page 38, where we have design reviews, that there be an additional policy in there that talks about how this neighborhood center shall act as a town focal point, and that the building walls shall be setback to create public spaces and an openness that provides a corridor both east -west between 37th and 42nd and between 140th and 148th. In essence you would have a building wall, but the wall would be setback to create public spaces. You will have substantial areas of glass and interesting building fronts. Comment: I don't know if we should say that building walls shall be set back because there are so many ways to achieve that. Moira: So we can say that public spaces shall be created within this area and there will be a feeling of openness. Question: Do you want to say public spaces? That implies that you will use public funds to acquire it. • Moira: This is under design review, where we will be telling the people that are developing buildings. Comment: A place where people can gather. Question: What about pedestrian corridor areas? Jack: So you are looking for a tern that conveys that it's not a traditional private property like the mall corridors, a quasi - public space. Moira: We can say "privately developed and maintained public spaces." Comment: The main thing is that you aren't using public funds and you aren't acquiring public property. Comment: This could be a chance for a neighborhood commercial area and a cultural . area to be united together with a public space at 99 and 144th and a public space at 1 ,;(ovember 18, 1993 Page 7 144th and 42nd. Whatever you develop in between, you have these two areas that ,could be tied together. Moira: Does it seem like we're on the same wave length? There may be substitutions for some of the words, but the concept is privately developed areas used by the public. Comment: Does that square with page 32, the middle of the page where it says, "Fundamental to designing for pedestrians and making transit use as pleasant as possible...." Comment: I guess the only thing lacking is what do the developers get in return? There should be some tradeoff. Moira: What tradeoffs are you willing to give? Comment: Height. Moira: You already said it could be three stories, are you saying that they could have more? Comment: Yes. The design and form standards are being set by the high school. Agreement to create policy in design standards for this intersection. Moira: Do you want to go back to policy 12 now or later? Comment: I was happy with what Tim proposed last week. Moira: What I have is, To locate transit facilities within the SR 518 -99 interchange." Comment: Actually what Tim proposed last week was, "locate transit facilities and /or rail station in the SR 518/99 vicinity." Moira: And leave off the rest? Comment: No, include the rest of the policy as written in the report. Agreement to have policy 12 read, "Locate transit facilities andlor rail station in the SR 518199 vicinity and develop a multi -modal transfer area for buses, automobiles and pedestrians." City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director STAFF REPORT TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW Prepared 6/15/94 HEARING DATE: June 23, 1994 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY Special Permission Parking #L94 -0037 Conditional Use Permit #L93 -0089 Design Review #L93 -0088 Special Permission Sign #L94 -0041 APPLICANT: Architects Reed Reinvald, for King County Library Services PROPOSAL: LOCATION: ACREAGE: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: ZONING: To construct a 5,250 square -foot neighborhood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration swale, 6' wide sidewalk and street trees. 4060 S. 144th St. (at 42nd Ave. So.) Approximately 1.15 acre Single Family Residential R1 -7.2, Single Family Residential SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) issued on 6/10/94 STAFF: Ann Siegenthaler 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431 -3665 Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 2 ATTACHMENTS: A. Vicinity Map B. Site Plan/Landscape Plan C. Building Elevations D. Floor Plans E. King County Library System Parking Summary F. Staff Recommendations: Site Plan G. Staff Recommendations: Building H. Color Sketch (to be submitted at hearing) I. Color Board (to be submitted at hearing) J. Applicant's response to Conditional Use K. Applicant's response to Design Review L. Comment sheets from resident FINDINGS VICINITY /SITE INFORMATION A. Surrounding Land Uses On the west and north, the site is bordered by single family residences (see Attachment A). Also on the north is an apartment complex. Across 42nd Avenue to the east is Foster High School. South of the site are single family residences and the fire station. B. Existing Development The site previously was occupied by a single family home. It is vacant, basically flat, with no distinguishing features. C. Vegetation The site was previously cleared and developed. It is now covered with grass and bushes. There are some mature fruit and ornamental trees on site, some of which will be incorporated into the library landscape plan. D. Project Description The applicant proposes to construct a 5,250 square -foot neighborhood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration swale, 6' wide curbside sidewalk and street trees (see Attachments B, C, D). Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 3 BACKGROUND The community has been informed of the Foster Library project in several ways: • Notice mailed to residents within 300 feet; • Notice published in newspaper; • Notice posted on site; • Articles in February and June 1994 Hazelnut; • Status update letters mailed to residents within 300 feet; and other interested parties (6/8/94, 3/14/94, 1/26/94). • Information meeting with Tukwila Library Board 2/1/94; • Public information meeting 2/15/94. Approximately 20 residents attended and the February public information meeting. Many residents filled out comment sheets. Although residents reviewed the original design, many of their comments are applicable to the new design. Public comment sheets comprise Attachment L. The project SEPA environmental review was completed 6/10/94. A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) was issued with a condition that trees proposed for retention must be adequately protected during construction. In addition, the MDNS required the project to undergo Design Review, as follows: "To more specifically address potential impacts and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, the library design shall be further refined through the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review processes. The proposal shall include for Board of Architectural review the following revisions: a. To reduce light spillover into adjacent residential lots, the west and north perimeter of the site shall have a solid decorative fence and /or opaque landscape screening. b. Given Tukwila policies regarding outdoor recreation, the proposal shall provide quality outdoor areas for the public." Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 4 DECISION CRITERIA Under the Zoning Code, a library must obtain Planning Commission approval for the amount of parking provided (TMC 18.56.050). As a non - residential use in a residential zone, the library must also obtain a Conditional Use Permit (TMC 18.12.050, under criteria in TMC 18.64.050). Approval by the Board of Architectural Review (per TMC 18.60.050) was required in the SEPA environmental decision. This same process of Conditional Use Permit and Design Review was required for Foster High School. The Sign Code requires Planning Commission approval of public facility signs in residential zones (TMC 19.32.080). Given the above requirements, the applicant is requesting four approvals: I. Special Permission for the amount parking provided; II. Conditional Use Permit approval; III. Design Review and approval of the library design; and W. Special Permission for the design of signs (included as part of Design Review). Accordingly, the staff report is divided into four parts: Special Permission Parking; Conditional Use Permit Criteria; Design Review Guidelines; and Special Permission for Public Facility Sign. Review criteria for each of these approvals are shown below in bold, followed by staffs summary. The applicant's .written responses to the criteria - are given in Attachments J, K. ... Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 5 I. SPECIAL PERMISSION: PARKING (TMC 18.56.050) "The minimum number of off-street parking spaces for "public facilities, including libraries...shall be determined by the Planning Commission" (TMC 18.56.050). The applicant has provided parking information from other libraries which can be compared with parking for Foster Library (see Attachment E). According to this parking chart, 7 other libraries of similar size (5,000-6,000 s.f.) have an average of 26 parking stalls. Foster Library will have 34 stalls (see Attachment B). The Meeting Room in these libraries has an average capacity of 51 people. In comparison, the Foster Library Meeting Room has a 70-person capacity (see Attachment D). It is likely that, at times of high use, some library patrons will park off-site along 42nd Avenue or at Foster High School. CONCLUSIONS: Based on information from the applicant, the amount of parking provided at Foster Library is comparable to that provided at other libraries. Therefore, no additional on-site parking is needed. RECOMMENDATIONS: As on-site parking is adequate, staff recommends approval of the amount of parking provided in the proposal. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 6 II. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CRITERIA (TMC 18.64.050) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the pubic welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is located. The proposal provides an amenity to the neighborhood. The site plan, building design and landscaping reduce potential impacts. For example, substantial landscaping has been added, and a biofiltration swale will improve the quality of stormwater runoff (see Attachments B, C, D). 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. The library building has a lower height and greater setback than required in the Single Family Residential zone The proposal includes landscaping buffers of 10 -foot width or more, even though no landscaping is required. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. The new library would generate approximately 250 (125 in, 125 out) vehicle trips to roads in the project area. This is probably more traffic than the existing library, but less than what the high school generates. Vehicles will use two driveways into the site, which will be marked with pedestrian crossings. Sidewalks are included in the proposal. The existing four -way stop at 144th Street and 42nd Avenue will remain. Tukwila Fire and Public Works Departments have approved the proposed traffic and circulation patterns. The building and main entrance are located as far as possible from residences. Where single family residences abut the site, there will be wide landscape buffers. Noise will be minimized by the library's limited hours, typically from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. These characteristics help reduce potential impacts. However, as a non - residential use, the library has the potential to affect adjacent residential areas. Landscape screening and fencing are not provided along all edges. Residents have expressed concern about potential light spillover and glare. To address this, the project's SEPA decision required improvements in perimeter screening, through landscaping and /or a decorative opaque fence. Approval of Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 7 details was deferred to the Board of Architectural Review. In addition, the project has the potential to affect the aesthetic character of the neighborhood. This will require a more detailed evaluation. The Design Review process provides an opportunity to address screening and aesthetic issues in detail. Design Review was required as a condition of the project's MDNS. 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. Tukwila's current Comprehensive Plan includes policies intended to protect residential areas from non - residential uses. With some refinements in landscape screening and building design, the proposal can be consistent with these policies (see Criteria #3, above). 5. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. The proposed site plan, building design and landscaping reduce most, but not all, potential impacts (see Criteria #3, above). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare.... The site plan, building design and landscaping have been designed to reduce impacts to the neighborhood, and to provide an amenity. Therefore, the proposal will not be injurious to the public welfare or its surroundings. 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district... The proposal meets and exceeds the standards of the single - family residential zone. 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses... Traffic and pedestrian circulation have been adequately addressed. The proposed building design, site plan, landscaping and screening, have the potential to be compatible with the surrounding area. The specific way in which potential impacts are addressed can be resolved through the Design Review process. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 8 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed library is generally consistent with existing Comprehensive Plan policies which require protection of single family residential areas. 5. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts . which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. As noted under Criteria #3, the plans do not satisfy all aesthetic and landscape screening concerns. This can be addressed through approval of refinements in the Design Review process. RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the fact that, with additional refinements to be approved through Design Review, the project generally meets the criteria, staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 9 III. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA (TMC 18.60.050) 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. In the site plan, the building is located close the street corner and oriented to the west (see Attachment B). This has several advantages. A corner location gives visual prominence to the relatively small building. This is especially important next to the large high school. Another advantage is that the building helps to screen the parking lot. Locating the building away from residential areas may also help reduce potential conflicts. The orientation of the main entrance allows combined access for both cars and pedestrians. The plan also accommodates the typical motorist use of the book drop at the main entrance. For this building orientation to be successful, the "rear" facades along the streets and the entry must be carefully designed. Otherwise, the library could appear to "turn its back" on the neighborhood, instead of being inviting. The applicant has emphasized the main entrance with a portico (porch) and entry plaza. A wide entry walk with sitting wall at South 144th Street helps to provide a memorable arrival to the library. Building facades have been revised to include windows and details which help make the building more inviting to the neighborhood (see Attachment C). 2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area. Harmony in texture, line and masses is encouraged. Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. The library site is surrounded by a variety of uses. To fit its context, the library design must relate to single and multiple - family residences of various ages and Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 10 styles, and to the "civic monument" scale of the adjacent high school. The applicant has chosen a theme for the building which includes references to features in the high school building, such as columns and portico (see Attachment H). At the same time, the library has a height and scale which is more residential in character (see Attachment C). Durable exterior materials in earth tones are proposed, which are compatible with the subdued character of nearby residences (see Attachment I). The landscape plan provides buffers next to residences, while the "public" sides of the building are more formal and open. Access is from the north or south via two driveways and entry walks. Sidewalks are provided. However, the library entry is handicapped accessible only from the remote north walkway. 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axes, and provide shade. In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. Screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. Quality public buildings, especially a community library, have two distinguishing characteristics. First, they take advantage of opportunities for lively outdoor public spaces and public artwork. Both the City Council and Arts Commission have expressed enthusiasm for such spaces in the new library. Second, they provide a main entry which is visually strong and provides a memorable "procession" to the library from the street. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 11 Public spaces and main entry: The Foster Library proposal provides one main outdoor gathering area, incorporated into the entrance. There are 3 to 4 areas which can accommodate future artwork. The proposal emphasizes the main entry through wide entry steps and sitting wall leading to an entry plaza. As a place for both gathering and for artwork, the entry design adds appeal to the project. Detailing: As noted by the applicant, the landscape plan responds to the architecture and site plan in several ways. However, relationships between some elements are not clear. For example, the oblique angle shape of the entry plaza does not appear to relate to any angle in the portico or the steps. The diagonal row of poplar trees is bold and visually interesting. Yet, the diagonal does not have a visible counterpart in building design. This is also true of the diagonal in the entry steps. Planters at the entry have interesting shapes, but it is not clear if they include retaining walls which follow grade changes. Many of the details which clarify design intent or add quality to a design are not evident in the plans. For example, details of the sitting wall would indicate whether it functions as an inviting area (with appropriate height, width, etc. for sitting). Contrasting paving materials or colors in the entry steps and entry plaza would add emphasis to the entry. As noted earlier, the main entry is not convenient to handicapped patrons approaching from the west. In other locations, it is not clear what type of plants are proposed. The landscape plan lists several different, dissimilar plants for the same symbol (e.g. daylilies and holly). As noted in Section II, Conditional Use Permit, it is not clear whether adequate screening (with landscaping or fencing) is provided along all residential areas. Additional issues in the landscape plan: • Several existing trees are proposed to be saved. Although the large elm is to be retained, it is likely to have most of its roots damaged by parking lot construction. Usually, adequate tree protection involves protection of at least the area under a tree's canopy. The planter around the elm's base is 8 feet wide. • While the dumpster /transformer area is screened, the configuration of the wall and lack of lighting next to the staff entry raise safety concerns. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 12 • A street light is located in the middle of the entry walk (near the street intersection). • A "biofiltration Swale sign" (presumably for interpretive purposes) is located in an area which is not very visible or accessible. • As the application drawings are not intended for construction, no irrigation is proposed yet. Site lighting: Light standards (total of 5) are proposed along entry drives and in the parking lot. It is not clear if this is adequate to safely light the area. No lighting is proposed to accent the building, walkways, or landscape features. 4. Building Design. Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. Two characteristics of high quality buildings are 1) high quality materials, and 2) attention to details. Quality materials are especially important for a small-scale building like the library, where the relationship with the user is more intimate and details are seen close up. Details also become important when a building, such as the proposed library, has a simple shape with little exterior modulation. Exterior materials: Foster Library's exterior will have a combination of several materials (see Attachment I). Brick veneer and stucco -like Dryvit will predominate. The overall Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 13 colors will be warm, earth tones. Accent features such as columns, doors, and windows will be finished in metal painted a contrasting color. "Medallions" (large tiles stamped with a design) are used as accents on two facades. Detailing: The applicant has explored ways to incorporate interesting patterns into the library exterior. For example, downspouts and columns have been added which provide vertical modulation. On the east facade, windows and medallions are arranged in rhythmic patterns. The medallions themselves could become sculpted artwork. In addition, windows have been added wherever possible. This provides modulation in an otherwise box -like structure, and makes the building more inviting from the street. Windows also enhance nighttime appeal of the site and building. The large window which wraps around the SE corner is a distinctive feature of the library. In concept, such features have the potential to give the building variety and warmth. However, the proposal has such variety that each facade is very different than any other. Some features and patterns are repeated nowhere else. For . example, the pattern of medallions on the east facade is not repeated elsewhere; some doors have medallions overhead, while others do not. The Large windows at the north and SE corner are different from each other, and have a very different style than other windows. The shape of the large window is on the west facade is not found elsewhere. Entry portico: One of the key features of the library is the entry portico (see Attachment C). As previously discussed, the entry steps and plaza help provide a meaningful outdoor space and "sense of arrival." The entry portico is an integral part of this important area. The portico is formed by the cornice, supported by two columns. Its roofline is flush with the building. The columns used in portico do not match each other, nor the column at the SE corner, and are not used in other areas. Cornice: Another distinctive element of the building is its cornice. The cornice has multiple layers, which create visual depth in the facades, and a solid cap for the building. The cornice is unusual in that it does not extend around the entire building. It stops and starts in a different way on each facade. In places, the cornice appears to be "supported" by narrow rain downspouts. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 14 Building lighting: An important community building, used and visible after sundown, can continue to provide architectural appeal through an imaginative lighting design. However, the proposal does not take advantage of this opportunity. 5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture. Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. The library proposal includes one bench at the entry, along with a sitting wall. Bike racks, trash receptacles or other street furniture are not indicated. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. Proposed landscaping and sidewalks generally provide an appropriate transition to the street, and screening of service areas. The height and scale of the building are appropriate for the site. However, the entry does not have enough visibility or refinement to counteract the building's inward orientation. This could be accomplished with refinements in the entry plaza and portico (see Landscape Criteria and Building Design Criteria). Refinements in windows and details will help the building appear more inviting to the neighborhood (see Building Design Criteria). 2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area. The building generally fits its neighborhood setting. However, additional landscape screening is needed next to residences (see Landscape Criteria). Vehicular & pedestrian circulation is generally logical and safe, although convenient barrier -free access is needed (see Landscape Criteria). In addition, two minor revisions would be appropriate: a) there appears to be no need for both scored concrete and traffic buttons at the driveways; and 2) the curve in the north sidewalk appears odd and unnecessary. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 15 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. The applicant has provided, in general, a quality landscape plan. However, the plan needs additional refinement to clarify design intent, to strengthen underlying concepts, and to resolve unfinished details. The main areas needing refinement are noted below. Public space and entry: The proposal provides the beginnings of a high quality "people place." The entry steps and sitting wall have the potential to provide an amenity for patrons, and create an appealing processional experience from the street to the library. With more emphasis, the entry plaza could become a memorable focal point. To achieve its potential, the entry area needs more detailing and refinements. These are noted below and shown in Attachment F. Detailing: The entry plaza needs to be re- designed with a size and shape which is better related to the portico, steps, and other site features. This could include sharpening the plaza's angle to 90 degrees, or matching the diagonal in the row of poplars, enlarging the plaza, and /or changing the shape of the portico (see Attachment G). Refinements in the entry plaza should include the landscape planters. The grades of the entry planters need refinement to better relate to the entry plaza and portico. In addition, contrasting paving at the entry plaza would help emphasize the area more inviting. Contrasting colors or banding could be used to tie the plaza to the steps or the cap of sitting wall. The sitting wall concept is very appealing; however, it needs to be detailed to function well as a sitting wall. The wall should be an appropriate height (approx. 18 ") and have a wide enough cap for sitting. Proposed walkways are generally safe and attractive. However, the entry plaza/walk should be re- designed to incorporate barrier -free access. As the planting plan is not specific, it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding quality and aesthetic effects. Plans should clarify which plant species will be used where (e.g. whether street trees will be ash, maple or both). Solid perimeter fencing and /or opaque landscape screening are needed to address potential light spillover to residential areas to the north and west. For a community building surrounded by residential uses, fencing should be of decorative material and quality construction (i.e. not chain link). Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 16 Other landscape plan refinements: • To help ensure the survival of the large elm, the surrounding planter should be enlarged. This could result in 1 -2 fewer parking stalls for the project. However, a 32 -33 stall parking area would be consistent with parking provided at similar libraries. • The dumpster /transformer area wall and landscaping should be re- examined for alternatives which increase safety. The area should include adequate lighting. • The street light located in the middle of the entry walk will interfere with pedestrian circulation. It also visually interrupts the nicely- designed street corner. It should be relocated to the nearby landscape planter or other more logical place. • The "biofiltration swale sign" is an appealing idea, which could get lost in its present location. The sign would be more effective if moved closer to the entrance or edge of parking lot. • Irrigation of all areas, including street planting strips, is necessary to ensure plant survival. Irrigation plans should be submitted for approval with building permits. Site lighting: Lighting does not appear to be adequate for safety. It is also not designed to enhance site features. For example, lighting standards are not of an attractive style and scale for walkways. The plan misses other opportunities; for example, the row of poplars or the sitting wall could be dramatically lighted. 4. Building Design. Foster. Library will be an important and highly visible building in the community for years to come. Recognizing this, the applicant has revised the design several times to improve its quality. For example, the new design has an appropriate relationship to Foster High School, and has a residential scale which fits the larger neighborhood context. Exterior materials have a durability and richness suited to a civic structure. The geometrical shapes of windows and other elements have the potential to create a bold and interesting building. The revised design begins to address the need for a quality civic project. However, refinements are needed. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 17 Detailing: The proposed building does not have a level of refinement appropriate for this type of facility, with appropriate scale, detailing, and internal consistency between architectural elements. For example, rain gutter downspouts are too small for important vertical elements, and appear to be "dangling" from the cornice. The downspouts do not appear to use quality materials. Medallions and windows are not well - framed. As a result, their potentially interesting patterns tend to get lost. Lack of internal consistency gives the building an overall appearance of disharmony. For example, the large windows at the north and SE corner do not relate to each other, and have a very different style than other windows. The medallions are not used consistently. The west and south facades appear to be unrelated. To address these issues, the applicant needs to fine -tune the building details. Areas which need special attention are noted below, and shown in Attachment G. • Downspouts should be re- designed as an integral part of the architecture, with a better match to other vertical elements of the building. Possible solutions: enlarge and cover with pilasters /columns; use accent colors; wrap the base of the building around the downspouts. • The transition between medallions, windows and vertical elements should be detailed to better define their edges and patterns. Possible solutions: add frames; add contrasting materials; deep insets to create shadows. • Repetition of patterns or similar elements should be used to provide more internal consistency between architectural elements. Possible solutions: repeat the medallion pattern; use downspouts or columns on other facades; extending the cornice around the entire building. • Refinements in the windows would also make the building more harmonious. Possible solutions: extend the north window to the building base like the SE window; use a unit size and shape similar to that used in other windows. Entry portico: The entry portico is weak. It does not have sufficient visual weight or interest to serve as the focal point for the main entrance. It is not very visible from the north or east. In addition, the lack of refinement in details, such as columns, detracts from the portico. Possible solutions: enlarge the portico to the west for greater visibility and an entrance "gate" effect; refine columns to better match downspouts, each other, and other vertical elements of the building. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 18 Cornice: The cornice helps the top of the building appear finished and anchored. However, the thickness of the cornice and the way it is attached to downspouts makes it appear out of proportion. The cornice also ends abruptly, which gives it the appearance of being "tacked -on" to the building. Possible solutions: reduce the thickness or layers of the cornice; strengthen other elements such as downspouts; wrap the edges back into the building; add columns or other vertical "grounding" element; extend the cornice across the length of the facade. Building lighting: Without an exterior lighting proposal, the building at night may appear drab, or even inhospitable. As this facility will be used and highly visible at night, an attractive lighting scheme should be integrated into the architectural design. For example, lighting could be used to highlight "medallions," columns or the cornice. 5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture. The project should include provisions for bike racks and trash receptacles. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Foster Library proposal be approved with conditions. Refinements should be subject to final Board approval at a later hearing, or the Board could direct the applicant to submit refinements to staff for administrative approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Landscape & Site Treatment: (See Attachments F, G) 1. Traffic buttons at entry drives shall be deleted. 2. The curve and small planting island in the north sidewalk shall be deleted. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 19 3. The entry area shall re- designed to complement the portico and better relate to the building and other site features. The applicant shall consider: a. Changing the shape of entry plaza; b. Enlarging the size of entry plaza; c. Adjusting grades of planters; and d. Using contrasting materials or colors in paving and walls. 4. The sitting wall shall be refined to ensure an appealing and functional seating area, with an appropriate height and a cap wide enough for sitting. 5. The entry plaza/walk shall be re- designed to incorporate convenient barrier -free access, which is architecturally integrated with the entry plaza. 6. The west and north perimeter of the site shall have a solid fence of decorative material and quality construction and /or opaque landscape screening. Chain link or unadorned board fencing is not acceptable. 7. The landscape plan shall be revised to clarify which plant species will be used in which locations and re- submitted for approval. Selected plants shall be biologically and aesthetically appropriate for their chosen location. 8. The applicant shall ensure that the large elm to be retained is adequately protected. a. The applicant shall consider enlarging the planter around the large existing elm by 1 stall on each side. 9. The dumpster /transformer area wall and landscaping shall be designed to provide for both screening and for employee safety, and shall include adequate lighting. 10. The street light located in the middle of the entry walk shall be relocated to so as not to interfere with pedestrians crossing the street or entering the building. 11. The biofiltration swale sign shall be relocated for better visibility by library patrons. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 20 12. All areas, including street planting strips, shall have automatic irrigation, with irrigation plans submitted with building permit applications. 13. A site lighting plan shall be submitted for approval, which provides safe, attractive, pedestrian -scale lighting for walkways, and which complements landscaping. Plan shall include details of standards and fixtures. Building Design: (see Attachments F, G) 14. The building design shall be revised to provide better detailing and internal consistency between architectural elements. The applicant shall consider: a. Defining window shapes with heavier frames or mullions /muntins: b. Framing medallions; c. Enlarging and covering downspouts to appear as columns pilasters /columns; d. Use of accent colors in downspouts and columns; e. Wrapping the base of the building around the downspouts. f. Changes in the size and shape of the large windows at the north and SE corner, and relationship to other windows; g. Extending the north window to the building base (like the SE window); h. Repetition of medallion pattern on other facades; i. Consistent use of medallions on all facades; and j. Adding downspouts or columns on the north or south facades. 15. The entry portico shall be re- designed to provide sufficient visual weight, architectural interest and detailing appropriate to an important public entrance. The applicant shall consider: a. Enlarging the portico to the west, to the edge of the sidewalk; b. Enlarging the portico to the south, to the edge of the steps and planters; and c. Refining support columns to be more similar to each other, the downspouts, and to other vertical elements of the building. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page. 21 16. The cornice shall be re- designed so that it is well - integrated with each facade, has an appropriate scale for the building, and has a balanced relationship with other architectural elements. The applicant shall consider: a. Extending the cornice around the entire building; b. Reducing the thickness or number of layers in the cornice; c. Strengthening related vertical elements (downspouts or columns); and d. Providing a finished edge where the cornice meets other planes and elements. 17. An architectural lighting plan shall be prepared which complements building architecture and details, with minimal impacts to adjacent • residential areas. a. The applicant shall consider using lighting to highlight "medallions," columns or the cornice. Street Furniture and Site Details: 18. Plans shall be revised to include street furniture, such as bike racks, trash receptacles, etc., which is appropriate to a public facility and integrated with the overall architectural concept. Staff Report to Planning Commission/B.A.R. Foster Library, 6/15/94 Page 22 IV. SPECIAL PERMISSION: PUBLIC FACILITY SIGN (TMC 19.32.080) Single Family Zones: Home Occupation, Church, Approved Conditional Use and Public Facility Signs. (C) Public facilities may have one sign for each street upon which the property fronts; signs shall be located in the setback area or upon the face of the building. Total area of sign or signs shall not exceed 60 square feet per face; maximum height above ground when in setback area shall not exceed sixteen feet; minimum setback shall be eight feet; and base of sign shall be located in a landscaped area...Illuminated signs shall use indirect, concealed sources, or backlighted letters on an opaque background. All signs in Subsection 19.32.080 (C) must be approved by the Planning Commission. A freestanding monument sign is proposed (see Attachment B). It is 62.5 s.f. in area, and 7.58 feet in height. This exceeds the 60 s.f. allowed by code. The sign will be located in landscaping at the street corner. While it appears classical in its shape and lettering style, there is no indication of materials or colors, or method of illumination. A wall sign is also proposed on the south wall of the entry. It appears to be approximately 9 s.f. in area. It is not clear from the application what materials, colors, or illumination will be used for the wall sign. CONCLUSIONS: The freestanding sign has an appropriate location, but its classical -style design is not consistent with the bold architecture of the revised building. The sign should be re- designed to incorporate elements similar to those found in the building. In the re- design, the sign area will need to be reduced to 60 s.f. to meet code. To evaluate the project's overall plan for signs, more information is needed regarding sign materials, colors and illumination. RECOMMENDATIONS: Proposed signs shall not exceed 60 s.f.; and plans shall be revised to ensure that sign design is consistent with the building's architectural theme, and shall include details on size, materials, colors and illumination. City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director SUPPLEMENT TO STAFF REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION Prepared 8/22/94 MEETING DATE: August 25, 1994 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY APPLICANT: Architects Reed Reinvald, for King County Library Services PROPOSAL Approve the applicant's design revisions that implement Conditions of Approval from the June 23, 1994 public hearing. LOCATION: 4060 S. 144th St. (at 42nd Ave. So.) STAFF: Ann Siegenthaler, Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Site, Plan/Landscape Plan from 6/23/94 B. Site Plan/Landscape Plan REVISED C. Building Elevations from 6/23/94 D. Building Elevations REVISED E. Sketch of Main Entry from 6/23/94 F. Reflected Ceiling Plans G. Staff Recommendations: Building Elevations 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS BACKGROUND: Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 2 On June 23, 1994 the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved the Design Review application for the new 5,250- square foot Foster Library building, parking lot and landscaping at 4060 South 144th Street. The project was approved with 17 conditions related to the site plan/landscaping and the building design. The Board felt that the specific implementation of 8 of these conditions warranted further review by the Board. The applicant was directed to submit revised drawings which would implement 3 conditions related to the entry area, 4 conditions related to the building design, and 1 condition related to bike racks. The revised drawings were to be reviewed by the BAR at the 8/25/94 public meeting The 8 remaining issues for BAR review are discussed below. The BAR - imposed condition is shown in bold, followed by staff's evaluation of how the proposal addresses the BAR condition. FINDINGS: A. Main entry plaza and sitting wall 1. Entry area: "The entry area shall re- designed to complement the portico and better relate to the building and other site features." The applicant has revised the original entry area design and included better detailing (see Attachments A and B). The entry steps have a diagonal orientation which is repeated in the triangular- shaped planters, pavement scoring, handicapped ramp and cut -away ceiling of the entry portico (see Attachment F). 2. Sitting wall: "The sitting wall shall be refined to ensure an appealing and functional seating area, with an appropriate height and a cap wide enough for sitting." The applicant has revised the drawings to show a wide cap on the wall at the entry steps (see Attachment B). The applicant will include additional details of the sitting wall in building permit applications. Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 3 3. Entry plaza /walk: "The entry plaza/walk shall be re- designed to incorporate convenient barrier -free access, which is architecturally integrated with the entry plaza." A handicapped ramp has been incorporated into the main entry plaza (see Attachment B). The ramp repeats the strong diagonal theme used in the entry steps and the revised triangular- shaped planter. Sharp corners on the ramp were a Board concern. The applicant proposes to address this using a 6" radius on planter corners (see detail on Attachment B). B. Building design 4. Detailing of architectural elements: "The building design shall be revised to provide better detailing and internal consistency between architectural elements." The applicant has refined and further detailed several windows on the building (see Attachments C and D). The three windows on the west facade now match. The north window has a new shape which follows "notches" in the cornice. Its shape also relates to the main entrance window and cornice, which are similarly "notched." A new little window has been added to the north facade, with an L- shaped section of cornice above it. The medallions on the east facade have been framed with contrasting brick patterns. The medallions originally on other facades have been removed. 5. Entry portico: "The entry portico shall be re- designed to provide sufficient visual weight, architectural interest and detailing appropriate to an important public entrance." The entry portico is one of the most important features of the library. The original concern was that the portico design was not strong or refined enough for such an important element. The entire main entrance has since been re- designed (see Attachments C, D and E). The columns used in the portico now match each other (and those elsewhere). The cornice now has a "notch" in it, which relates to the shape of the window above the main door. Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 4 6. Cornice: "The cornice shall be re- designed so that it is well- integrated with each facade, has an appropriate scale for the building, and has a balanced relationship with other architectural elements." The cornice is perhaps the most important architectural element in the library design. It provides virtually the only relief on the building facade. The cornice is not a typical cornice in that it, does not extend around the entire building, or even the length of one facade. The edge of the cornice ends in one plane, rather than having the three tiers turn back into the building (see detail on Attachment D). The BAR condition was intended to address concerns that this important feature was out of proportion with other elements, was not well - integrated with the facade, and that it appeared to be "tacked on." Along with other architectural elements, the cornice has been revised (see Attachment D). On the north and west elevations, the cornice has been notched, to repeat new window shapes. A separate portion of cornice has been added to the north facade above a new, small window. The cornice previously incorporated downspouts as vertical elements (see Attachment C). The downspouts were revised so that the cornice is no longer attached to any vertical element. 7. Building lighting: "An architectural lighting plan shall be prepared which complements building architecture and details, with minimal impacts to adjacent residential areas." The applicant has proposed lighting on the south facade which will be incorporated into the cornice in a manner which highlights the medallions. C. Street furniture & site details 8. Bike rack: "Plans shall be revised to include bike racks; plans shall also include other street furniture..." Plans have been revised to include a bike rack at the main entrance. Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 5 CONCLUSIONS: A. Main entry plaza and sitting wall 1. Entry area: The strong diagonal orientation of the entry steps, ramp, planter and pavement, adds drama and interest to the main entrance. Each element is well - integrated with other entry features. 2. Sitting wall: The revised drawings, together with construction details to be submitted with building permit applications, will ensure that the sitting wall is appropriately detailed. 3. Entry plaza /walk: The handicapped ramp is well - integrated with the overall entry design. Potentially sharp corners on the ramp have been addressed by using a 6" radius on planter corners. The combined revisions noted above provide a main entrance which is visually strong and provides a memorable "procession" to the library from the street. The entrance will function well, and provide an appealing outdoor public space. Staff concludes that the applicant has met these BAR conditions. B. Building design 4. Detailing of architectural elements: Refinements have resulted in windows which are much better detailed, and which better relate to each other, and to other architectural elements. The concept of repeating "notching" in windows and cornice works well. The notches add architectural interest, and help integrate distinct features. However, the notches in the main entrance window do not have the same proportions as those in the cornice or in the north window. To strengthen the relationship intended by "notching," window panel shapes should be revised to be more compatible with existing proportions (see Attachment G). The little window on the north facade appears odd; it has no apparent relationship to anything else on the building. The added piece of cornice over this window exaggerates this incongruity. A window shape Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 6 more similar to other windows, or extension of the cornice would help remedy this. The new framing around the medallions on the east facade better defines this element, and strengthens the medallions as a main feature and potential artwork. However, this interesting feature is not repeated elsewhere in the building. The result is that each building facade is more made more distinct from the other, when the facades already appear somewhat unrelated. Some medallions should be used on other facades so that the concept is integrated into the entire building. The concept of notches in the windows and cornice helps integrate the various architectural elements with each other and with the facade. Downspouts, columns, and medallions have been appropriately refined. With some minor revisions to the window shapes, and by repeating the medallions, as noted in RECOMMENDATIONS below, the proposal would meet the above BAR condition. 5. Entry portico: As noted above, the entire main entrance has been re- designed. The entry portico has not undergone major change, but has been refined and better integrated with other elements. Together, these revisions provide visual weight, architectural interest and detailing appropriate for the main entrance. 6. Cornice: The notches in the cornice (and windows shapes) on the north and west elevations help integrate the cornice with other architectural elements. However, staff is still concerned that the cornice may appear "tacked on" to the facade. When the downspouts were redesigned to reduce their prominence, the cornice lost a vertical component which tended to "anchor" it. The cornice has no horizontal anchoring either, as segments of the cornice are not connected to each other. The combined effect is the appearance of a box- like awning over the windows. To some degree the cornice still appears to be "tacked on." This is especially true of the north facade, where the small window is topped by a separate portion of cornice. The revised cornice design does not seem to be the best solution to the BAR condition. Staff concludes that some refinements are still needed to .nlil I..Mt ...WIG ITU.7E wlrlC)e .Coen 00.0417 PLANT SCHEDULE 7-u. 0 uamrsa .x. . 0 ALCM. IIM,rod ply 0 ICI, hanY'.rrfipp rwMnC.O M➢.M.! 'l I Nn.10Mw. H rw000 l Rm.,' a• RCet!l IAClal © CVSC.nMIw YKM<.M I NTS.I....4! L1�J,j Dena rn.a+s/wwaea N0410CM11......r10 G.1 I. Cl7 C.lNT. <M.C...1*. St KU, 4 7M.wunlu....WA.. 1. Mll 1.70701.707017, 7•41•71,01.1.7.00.7.4 1.7717004 . i NI.... M. 77-7-7 .77734.71.7wr ■ 7970..0....4 IDM Pax. f.731,471•1074 Ix rtt w 77.177007. Orvw.l. N r.. <p..• r•4 ..u.7.. OM. T.wM∎ P.M. u..wowv 1/U . WWI. IDOL/ WW1s. Nnc....1. .l WNW: c<Ow.n Mt Or( rut .7D 7.701%07030 I.47.77n cM∎.01.07 we l..GU. SP,I son /.lie MMUSCM waa SO/RMO I U/0.... TOR•. TOW UT.Qi no...LIN unu MCiO.TWWI. OW. MU. vMw.e7TIS/ =1 <o7.1. .1.e.. must c%%.o%O <OTC.7JAnn swan CORK KMIrrl.C...K M. is (,: uwr.uarD 11n00M. a.U4/1111000R4 nm.a P.M03.MCTCU∎..On414 a T...4 IC !M! CMI.E IINI IEVd • V 1N3WHOV11V TWOS •104. w SOUTH 144th STREET" .:. J 4 ..tl .. ' W KAlu r•• I® LOT STANDARD I 1.7%„nN.7. • wry.. Footeg )Llblr..xy 1711 P. +. MONUMENT SIGN • z U • GERRARD wrt 1...wr.. IS lard .. LL •••••• IL IN. WI•614. rn • 17_3X4 • LIBRAR -Y• -- ~� KING- COUNTY_ LIHAILRYSYSTEM 0 1.... DESIGN Z DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN 7777._.. O 0.1 L. Foster Library Revisions 8/22/94, Page 7 provide better architectural integration and refinement in the cornice. These refinements are outlined in RECOMMENDATIONS below. 7. Building lighting: The proposed medallion lighting will complement the library's architectural theme, and meet will the BAR condition for an architectural lighting scheme. C. Street furniture & site details 8. Bike rack: As revised plans show a bike rack, the applicant has met this condition of approval. RECOMMENDATIONS: Architectural details such as windows and medallions would benefit from further refinement, as follows (see Attachment G): a. Revise the shape of main entry window to better match proportions of north window. b. Add medallion(s) to other facade(s). Better integration of the cornice would be achieved with the following revisions (see Attachment G): c. Connect the new piece of cornice on the north elevation with the existing cornice. d. Wrap the cornice around a corner, as was done at the entry portico and southeast corner window. e. Extend the cornice further along the north elevation for better integration of the cornice and consistent proportions. f. Extend the 3 tiers of the cornice to its junction with the facade to provide a more refined edge. juun r.u.Y ..aunt /ge:, • (e(rGw(i mmle• ;'l.1T • ._— 77) L\ 7//4' ( ', t I 1 Z L_ ''IP 11 ,.A.nrn,..e SIM fe,m L43RARY BULDNG (NIR)' IUR,CO 4u St rM.M 1N3WHJdlld SOUTH 144th STREET DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN AVENUE SOUTH PLANT SCHEDULE e.L•n'1, nawLL&r15N.1N RAPP Q CYLCMILLII M343Ki .,M$T w0.K..34 VCCIDLaa nN.O.rKUSnM v.Urq 1 mO u. .nf 13LTLT(a1GCLT3 S. .110.1.040 i r nR.afl WM, t AMR CN,t..uwillOwt�..rc.f w (Mou•!. p A, All • .1.1110:110,13 rnocancr., © Kan ncc.rt f.nenOi. o.nl. p at. eefr..ucOr...a. u..+mse..ou 1Z ) • l..f..... 4C•t.0 au,fr.a9. lAVINC4 p ..naaOOW SICA,.wK.,AM.w...O CO..vOrr.uuf a] to /CW S, OUrOC. • .eC0anupgr. SP 1.0Cwu3.....u( O PUUS O.CC.I..(U,CI. M. O Il,ws,..» Lit. cwwnI, 4 NOCO..O.,n.e, Q voulnAt 1.USV.uyu/MAIM c..M(M.We, ocu ,Or. e.u( n. +net caCO'. KiiaO°vriu,:io iwa oac.,oOO`r�'00°° -01D IRS.S(UMCMn/ MICA CM AnCIA Sn..SO., At. -.o.uw ur.arn sou.nrf., ,CUMIN. ron.n q;7 rrm. wow. ,Sara.an3a 1140UK /CCYMS: CI mw w. ouv u.ss.C.us(rtsr CWPIU Pan.,.OUS. 03434CO CO,artAS,(n ouw(e CO. et mar rer.ewmn L.......J LInoo0n*arla.,tn.«>w. r,...us nwco...Krcuerwn.na.r.1.4 IC IC.1 CAME LCL3 IfVl NOTE: ALL PLANTED AREAS TO BE PIRIGATED RAMP AREA ENLARGEMENT rc� LIGHT STANDARD 0 are mon Lawn nor IF (m er Library - -++—. -- — DRYVIT 1, 1 — — ALLPAN IA SGN PANELS IMINTER GREEN) BACK LIT LETTERS --STAINED CONCRETE MONUMENT SIGN •THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE DE ARCHITECTS • FOSTER LIBRARY KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD • ro4cf „.. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN Men anI st ,nf b L -1 O NOM ELEVVATION O ZEAST ELEVATION ko. l /d. r -a 3 O SOUTH ELEVATION s.r.:l /a.r -a 3 1N3WHJV11V O 4WEST ELEVATION sw.:l /Y -1.4 ARCHITECTS REED REJNVALD 701 NM Tl., T. WirovlmMAO rR.c°`pall U w • wn ms ELEVATIONS A OS aoc.l1D 11 WY IM. 17071.00 Ara O U O ... I•MRO WO CO, Itt1 KML IMO NCR to x Ms MIAOW, I∎OCO•S ro*In OR Lad Moat •-- • MP maw ' MN. ■ � .t�ttt� � 1 ONORTH ELEVATION Sua: I/f•l' -f OSOUTH ELEVATION VAL' I /f•1' -f a 1N3WH3V11V MW OEAST ELEVATION SCJIL: I /f•1' -f W(i)4 (*1M 9{415 Vt. ■E)[/L MNANL O P k Ott InyOt I Mtlbt 10R0 AG FILL fI4 KN M.Cto iJlv0",l aaa — (A�er<rw MIDow. COMO 96 Slam In. NI • Mai • Minn ttl N obroo MW) t4 PA 5016{ ! twf0 {0{5.05 14•0 <OCR MW /WIIO ,OL COMC 960 N. ma =Mt IM PAO KMO MU IV= OCInollf t4lw tOO(O.7 O. 06'IO OOINw nwo WCttit tu[ f wt(Rf Otw9M (OI Iawllt n MW) mr OWEST ELEVATION scALL I/r.1'd .030,1® OK/ lw7 0000I/f11M nYt6 Moe IMO flan mats twt f • MO, MA AROUTECTS REED REDNALD t!� EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS VOCAL") 79 MT IMI Ys !102100 A5 FOSTER LIBRARY Revised Entry Cv.V,Iv., Li. �: , r nEVELOPMENT ATTACHMENT E ---7"••■----=//0 ■-•-iiii•iiiiiiiiiii!iti • II niMIM .)::?1,'W.;:'////,'././VdtVi 11111111111111111111111//:_,.%..fr'..X.. alm..7:WIT/4"),...,ri.::.......7' 14.4 ...a ::_. ,— 1 ,......,,,,,,,,,,p,,,,,,,,„,, ,., . ./.;.;...)..7.7%(k h .. • _ „..._, IIIKLIMM 1 - ./•:voi/ ,.. ' • ,..f!/.,!. - -c r Flu • es!AeH t/asl� H]1 • Paue Lair tk,11,1ZIP em•Ipws 0.5 11,9■14,5 1-7YL.4 Awl riteT sr4v*, pap (ggAw 407 t 1.1 10,44 Ir t X tr 2 • c 1 O FLOOR PLAN 01 .11T • 1•-0 A IN3WHOVl1d 2 O REFLECTED CEILING PLAN u4L It • 1•X 1a. CEILING TYPES ®M .Moll 04410.0 ten 41I ,,...51141 OIII YY Oki. m U4 Yr 04 wane .1011 414 .1116 mm en in. on sou, n 4*IA nu c eMID 0AZIa1 L I UM ••• RAM M[i.1 w411 MVP 4u n416 mm ®10133 10133 RAM 1A 1 UmK RMU MIL.! waD II 41411.4 em *014 Unwann LI9IlI4(4 Owl! mm U1. 0 ?414 '111 41411..4 Al`J..f 11a VCIJ PEED F8.JNVALD FLOOP PLAN & REF LECTEO CEILING PLAN v_. Ma AS MOKIt[D :9 JULY (994 1302700 A2 AIN•M• Mt. 54.4.4 M. IN••••4 LO■M 1N3INHOY11V 11111-11.NsMVXMVIAi inffitirael wirnmazeram t;'''111 Marial/MS .f!, INN = alM1 10110 MAL CO.4 .C4/1.< tire. rmso MCI sn R•••••4 t= 1.00 It MX • 1.4 LEVATION SO& 1/r• -P 0 O SOUTH ELEVATION VAL I.- Cr st•••CO COKUN ••St INTadouf Moor RM.. •tort, 144 1 so Tat OA M. ;Aran= rum z z rzliwziebvzowL Pm IrA =r 4*0471 01.• P0•108 UM) • M1.4 nom AM 14 NT • Ill., 0.1111,1 C.C.0 441444 4.10 INC.M.LT 1414 .4.•••"1 rpfnCref r emelt. too•ccl co•OnT skst OWE. IMMO ITO Vl MCI AtaeLlo htMAT INCRIS to•C0•5 OEAST ELEVATION Sera 1/1r•l•-0. MelUg NM 4(.444 •e IMAM. 4*410444 A61 I,1. r1•15,1 Slav CliermANILMIN gozgyzase ° ‘4411111°* 11 1111.11.1 .■0221 FffingiffilffgriArMi 9_,Fmnuarzigimazovnivy NM, A. OTC 11.51.09 .4 \ tied 04 104100 0. IWO "r 00my Mom/ MgMt M VI • MK • 1.1:2:0„1 r)WEST ELEVATION \—.15CALL lir • 1,11. .t ••••”. me WM 00 • MIMEOS REED RENVALD • . . : • .4,, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS Man Int 21 JAY 1111 WI 1.12211X1 A5 NMI 41 :1 Li O SOUTH ELEVATION VAL I.- Cr st•••CO COKUN ••St INTadouf Moor RM.. •tort, 144 1 so Tat OA M. ;Aran= rum z z rzliwziebvzowL Pm IrA =r 4*0471 01.• P0•108 UM) • M1.4 nom AM 14 NT • Ill., 0.1111,1 C.C.0 441444 4.10 INC.M.LT 1414 .4.•••"1 rpfnCref r emelt. too•ccl co•OnT skst OWE. IMMO ITO Vl MCI AtaeLlo htMAT INCRIS to•C0•5 OEAST ELEVATION Sera 1/1r•l•-0. MelUg NM 4(.444 •e IMAM. 4*410444 A61 I,1. r1•15,1 Slav CliermANILMIN gozgyzase ° ‘4411111°* 11 1111.11.1 .■0221 FffingiffilffgriArMi 9_,Fmnuarzigimazovnivy NM, A. OTC 11.51.09 .4 \ tied 04 104100 0. IWO "r 00my Mom/ MgMt M VI • MK • 1.1:2:0„1 r)WEST ELEVATION \—.15CALL lir • 1,11. .t ••••”. me WM 00 • MIMEOS REED RENVALD • . . : • .4,, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS Man Int 21 JAY 1111 WI 1.12211X1 A5 X10 I1' n to .vri1 c,:1. U 3 Proposal for NEW FOSTER LIBRARY 4 3_ 1 5 6 15 14 C N A s r r s. 7. 6 ST 4 I I •!A VICE 314' lorr J. 100 zS L'RK ST) \\ . 1 \\ 11 \\ 11 ,y6 IAo s A. E. AN"1 RS ■C21NIG, Gh1 £3.bq A K,=— 0f 1 PAR s° 11 ..— 11100"1,). s0 .j 71 e IJUNCi/ON S7)� S 14I ST ST AT T E 141 - -- 1 (11 - .r d.5 1• .re', : 4 g;■1' IF 1, I p,D /00 /00 i )4/�i0 1 ' 1.0.80 Ac. I 0 55 AC / Q1 13916 e r _- . /9N _�7c 1 o C.233 IC 2aS �M 0.99 AG (r 1 0 •1 ' 20 Ian S 5 2119 14 3 18 14015 J 140114 S'`,4 .37 Cl. 12625 j 36 1 Z1 14 C _ 26 35 4141, 5 21 1 34 14 28 I.33 H,117 29 4 00 5 6 15 :0 7 HUBNER 13ROS. 1. /5 Ac. ti b 8 1411 NNI 12 II411,- 14 j."R"- - TL 19/ -..1.2I:; 10 1 11)1:1 J 2 • ._` _ c 1 r.9�1 °•I ELMER ROWLEY N.C.MOLS AVE) S o 40 1.0? - 3; 11125 1.. •J.i ca 14135 11,279 /J,! //c' 04 LO • S$ 1/.4,.10 A I4Z aS . 2S6 •,, 01 ti J . 1422 42 39 .7. 1.::,�.' 7 / (uuNC4 N Co /5 1221 SITE ATTACHMENT A .R0 IAMM r•,.R PLANT SCHEDULE mom pt11011b. o` �...e..r..n....gll M. 01370,5 r tan FwrY MntFM,MMFrF+rl.fpuMll • rw.n..311,I .A lu..ano.wrwom.V. 11.014.11110A 2U11 ©1rtl..C.;: 0u/.n.7.SUr•.ILR. on { 111. t IR.r�.: n..n. Ill/ 0,11/1.V1..6 .:nw.e+nrt.. u.u1s I..ntWM. 11ST0If.C..R NMe• cntln.n+.u::na.aef Nv/•.LM •■ WNW.% • P M%1• • f.<Mr M. r. r0 /K.•'c.c .H,gli • .F.•. V IV RUI WINOAFIAlrgl �"�•�' LAVIN. gr.ISR1RUIIM N. UVVIr. 1 ,j ...Irw 117•1 SiLAMwIwlF Po.Ir1.]R•.gF NMI .0Y aRIM11dF F.1..p lrr•'wV1NO Cf•A.Vv .1 1.Fa.KU011F<I.,nn Ii NM1ll ryu.p.M.vF..N.rOCI... 4Au.1 YA.Mr•M MA OS MVO as IO..IM WWI FM.FM 1111 f. •Opfl 11717(1.■1•0. 5.111 r1A10IF0• f(�I CVIAI.RMO.. Mp.7n 1[.I.OGD �/J I wi1,11/. nllln1E17,1 Arru 13.•00, PO. It17 ll. CO., NMS I011IRUr.1 C..nw 'TA. 111.1.IAMr01u ICR.O, CA n.. 0.0o1o<on.❑ M•••••1 11 molvl. w, M•sswn.11 ns1 CRFUS InU4 ,VO IA OV7.0.• 001.1 .31.. O...gn<AV M N WIN. I L.n...v 15.1. L1010 IIOfiY.4 WM. I ImM.W Ilm. 1 I.WCI4 .<1[14 /WITCO a. r.mq fC fMf CAN.( Inn 11541 • n ww 10.0 DIDConi m 12LIKI&DEMLQINEHLELAMINKLEI AN CO SOUTH 144th STREET y I 1f■•'7(P NOM LD4T STAPCIA 0 l• uel..mp... •I.7• MONUMENT SION L I J t-� 0171+11 • /477;-A IinM 11 MYl IIF I1C •0,•011. • 13•111 IItIL ,r lob so. • VT*.M I..w 1j • o 11'11 •■ r 4 FOSTER LIBRARY ~� KIMG- COUNTY- W LIBRARY. SYSTEM O 11.1 V... DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN 0 Irepouri ?J. In). ..r SM. O, NORTH ELEVATION f 0.0014 1.00' V. ILI 0 00004 MIA f•LfO — 3 1N3WH3V11V 3 O SOUTH ELEVATION x*.1 /C.1.4 VUNID COCCI M:f M9 R (MC OAr1P )OwY - - �. t•a n • •rrs two 49 CM N}.1•6 ` h— r Yr9 nrVEi• — - i —l09 Cpl n 2 O EAST ELEVATION xeN: l /d•r -d _I) M. m I -... *Ma .,SUM bIlLe 1•11. MVO MK, Want/ WM • (Z WEST ELEVATION �l xw: t /f•r -d mw. jillipf•t • •.•s MO .`NO 0390f WA — aro oA! 11.10 j1' /� ELEVATIONS AS POLATTo .�--- 9ur1991 NNW 9.1011.00 0 0 O FLOOR PLAN a 1N3WHadl1V CDREFLECTED CEILING PLAN scar ijir•r-o` -- 0 0 - 0 -- 0 • ARCHRECIS RE1NVALD REED 101 NAM gno. T474 i7ArpmfeACO FAA ROI) 1.1.1.AS FLOOR PLAN & REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AS NDCMtO " 994 9307 I co A2 PARKING.XLS Page 1 " �' ` "" r = t �sr'�� ;� l.._.. 7. MAR 0 4 1994 CUivUiVtuNiTY ATTACHMENT E DEVELOPMENT KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM SUMMARY OF PARKING PROVIDED MARCH 4, 1994 Year Library Mtg. Rm. Parking Sq.Ft. Per Library But Sq. Ft. Capacity Spaces Space Bellevue 1967 18,500 100 93 199 Federal Way 320th 1969 10,800 64 73 148 Burien 1970 15,000 99 69 217 Kingsgate 1972 10,235 49 48 213 Kent 1973 15,000 99 19 789 Redmond 1975 13,888 100 47 295 Shoreline 1975 15,000 100 68 221 Fairwood 1986 15,000 80 83 181 Des Moines 1987 10,000 49 53 189 Federal Way Regional 1991 25,432 175 145 Kent Regional 1991 22,500 105 214 Woodinville 1993 15,000 113 133 Covington 1993 15,000 139 108 Burien 1993 20,448 , 91 225 Shoreline 1993 20,954 95 221 Total 10,000 sq.ft. + 242,757 1,271 191 Bothell 1968 8,300 99 46 180 Mercer Island 1968 8,700 75 36 242 Newport Way 1970 8,200 50 43 191 Skyway 1970 5,100 50 24 213 Boullevard Park 1971 6,536 49 29 225 Valley View 1982 6,400 49 35 183 Issaquah 1982 8,000 26 26 308 White Center 1976 6,370 24 24 265 Vashon 1984 6,196 33 33 188 Algona /Pacific 1994 5,250 68 21 250 Richmond Beach ? 5,250 86 21 250 Total 10,000 - 74,302 338 220 Grand Totals 317,059 1,609 197 Page 1 " �' ` "" r = t �sr'�� ;� l.._.. 7. MAR 0 4 1994 CUivUiVtuNiTY ATTACHMENT E DEVELOPMENT A 1N3WH3Vl1V KREEKV FEWE /(3, PROTECT 5I.M a UM FS, O WiF IC 1300 }45 I PEUI £, PIA 0 wu 61104 r Ytwr • AM alanacul 00.141 A% MM/w5l +M 4P...LI iO.VrOKCM1 © �pr..", IL....11l. Wtv.4... v1,1. ILA !4( /.1.,4.1 w...t roan LLllnw to CAW ..O /tu 777, LLL ESP Po size. S 4-E l 1r• i' ..�_�' 1P! oft 141R130. Oft, MeLlu• NIIIPw w WNW SOUTH 144th SIRE CAMS Mwr,•/ 4r•R7,4 ..v.oC ALAI ..tnO1 • b.1 I t Ills C44t. (.00,1:16 • rrM1 M to L • AA W 1,1111g./100I.1w1.1/41 LIOAKALI ul,0t•q. t 1.1.1A Mfr. 11.11..IO.13t44 W..rt,. P.K. Cf.,/,,...f 4/.0.61l/l,.N,tn /.or,* won. SA 0,0CC....,..u4 t.Nl yCCit.14C 1. t,t. t1..ltgwO...M.1. 4• KtO A1....K w.wu ONAN M W v. tn.M C/1...t.n *AI w I • 1.011 IOIL14II. l.•ll ft...*: : D+r COM.lPOLC.I..i40tMtL0.000 I w3.4IMCOL4/,1.id...3 • JMO IA /I/•1 NM FORAM CuMq.M 1Qtr-wt/Cu.1... ro,M 1n■.U1.g. /“..4+.41,4 O. W•OC O, I.It KIOlt VArn PI N...L .LLUgtnn M/ COt•44ry4 W41. CORN litwt.. M uw..• / y, u..•utgo 1.11,mq..a1/1.4 0 111wn4 .M.s MNgt•.tctctn..m.. CO •••.c iC MOT GUM LX)11 LEHI • V(KE-1-0C.ATE_ 47 - S TMPPRD siitINS wAL - DE_I •- - - =_- 11.11 I3P4:5? IER- RzEE DE4MH DEVELOPYEHLeJ AIMS PLAN COfRAGTIN& PAvEMEsr 1 TST C O • • w. 1161.,• VOHI/.ENT SKiN • ® REVISE W INIXWS .•.nm WI.. fd.4 PONS 116. MOM O 415E ORTH ELEVATION xW: I/. •1 • 0410 M)•.IN.II Topws - .•.m. T. MT , 1. •[ POW( 1,04 SCCO 5-XTEND C'CPN IcE. DETAIL 4 REPEAT ® MEDAU 1OM5 rMw>.< a IT0TI — ..C., .cmu 1N. ! Cm r r ow ro Y011 OSOUTH ELEVATION 3 J 1N3WH3V11V APP rro0 1.0011 •OSTo 190/.24 CdLLAANG ILAst5 ILL: cove g- poWNSroo OEAST ELEVATION xtl.: ve•I'4 COW p.m pp1'AI UN6 5 EPORTICO REYIEW CoRN1 DE P1» :. VCCE./...TICAL MENTS P MO R ..M•r PTOI ro..l. -N9,A[ 0116 -r .•(O ►..I..0 CMD TOT! 16 i Ey L i ;.. crue Ma„ .... IR. OTC H OWEST ELEVATION Sow 1 /(.l .d . Wvas T Awls MOf. M[ 1 1 ■ City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director City of Tukwila PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission and Board of Architectural Review will be holding a work session at 7:00 p.m. and public hearing at 8:00 p.m. on June 23, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION 7:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0035 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend TMC Chapter 18.46: Planned Residential Development (PRD). LOCATION: City-Wide II. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0035 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Amend TMC Chapter 18.46: Planned Residential Development (PRD). LOCATION: City-Wide III. PLANNING COMMISSION and BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0037: Foster Library Approval of Parking Provided L93 -0089: Foster Library Conditional Use Permit L93 -0088: Foster Library Design Review APPLICANT: Architects Reed Reinvald REQUEST: To construct a 5,250 sq. ft. neighborhood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration swale, 6' wide curbside sidewalk and street trees. LOCATION: 4060 42nd Ave. S., Tukwila. CASE NUMBER: L94 -0036: "Best" Sign APPLICANT: Howard Turner REQUEST: Planning Commission approval of an increased wall sign area from 150 sq. ft. to 225 sq. ft. per TMC 19.32.140., and Board of Architectural Review approval of project signs per its conditions for file L93 -0091. LOCATION: 400 Strander Boulevard, Tukwila. Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public hearing. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Distribution: Seattle Times June 10 & 17, 1994 Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 UF Pior/ene or,?cd c".5),t(i oe t43T 1Pod Aue. c Lt.,' 5 c,,„,(c., • • Cre.--k- 1 2-qo ii/51 A vc, 5 T ij Te(6'2) 1111(0)-'/■,. • (-2) „ rjej,,24, /L/020 /. vi) ....epefek) . .....")0e_SQ ,6 0-/J as - S1(..) s-r- r b6Vv.L yoras? S. r'vz-ce.c ac4-e `I2 / 44; i , A-Ue._ 5 1-1-2-q, 41 M /1 re- ;v. 5+-\ B P\\14/ , /4t\ 74/7 ulet,oci 16- & -1 tA- cri(t.t r- 4% 77Th., R: E. FL; 1 5 1994 commuN: DEVELOPME NT », - ......' .. .. .. .... ,..... ... .:. .,... .. i., .. ..:,'... .:_ .vM i' .S(!.t•>,— ;i -"{SS t�;y:l:i. :�Y'. �F%' !'"Y Y:.ii:.'rX.laUt: ..tA''� : i . 'Sv i�hgf _'.'f!.RSr:NaV' .,-:iii . :v r ' ti1 � tn.,fP ,,•y,,,.„y {, •'r; ' :Y,'b+Yi!'.i,hrt. � S. ,��. .rt r ':!r.y� `Y y1' • !' •4 +..f � s i � ", 't- n. � s't i �''� ^vfi:,es1., y, ?',�'"�t"� y,H 2�t • stirz• i; ��a.: t�.. n' ��.{ y. �d' .V.%J :i'rtxiLq.:�d�v$•?•i ?Jx�S �.i.�'ud..+...i..a1i.... :..5f 1{Z�:f. ......eL)�w1 �di•,.". i....... l; iie<' ii�'`r'.::i. >._ti.1�4..t:q, -.l. _,,I�1,d. ,5.vv, r:�1� }... .....=. ...n t1 ......F.41_. ae�. i. '1�.v +_._l .. {u:•2��.�'i..F. �{%ff1.4K.� ".:.e��,t 4 NEW FOSTER LIBRARY PUBLIC HEARING Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review Thursday, June 23, 1994, 8:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers. • f.,:.,.. ,. f�, a y.r�f�yy \ F r' i pu.s- vAfloN PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF TUKWILA APPLICATION FOR LAND USE ACTION PROJECT: Foster Library: Special Permission Park- ing ( #L94- 0037); Conditional Use Permit ( #L93- 0089); Design Review ( #L93 -0088) REQUEST: To construct a 5,250 -sq. ft. neighbor- hood library, including a 34 -stall parking lot, landscaping, biofiltration Swale, 6 -ft. wide curbside sidewalk, and street trees. LOCATION: 4060 - 42nd Avenue S. (NW corner of S. 144th Street and 42nd Avenue S.) APPLICANT: Architect Reed Reinvald, for King County Library Services THIS REQUESTED LAND USE ACTION WILL BE DISCUSSED AT A TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION /. BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING DATE: TIME: Thursday, June 23, 1994 8:00 p.m. LOCATION: City Council Chambers Tukwila City Hall 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 For further information, please contact the Department of Community Development at (206) 431 -3670 .BOOK NOW FOR THE NEW FOSTER LIBRARY Many of you have wondered about our new Foster Library. When will it open? What programs will it offer? What will it look like? You can find answers to your questions at an upcoming public information meeting. Designs are being drawn up now for the new Foster Library at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South. Like Foster High School, the new library will be an important focal point for the community. Similar in size to the existing Foster Library, the proposed library building will be 5,250 square feet, with a 26 -stall parking lot. Other improvements planned for the site include landscaping, seating areas, street trees and sidewalks. At the public information meeting, draft drawings and plans of the proposed Foster Library will be on display. The libra Tukwila Library Board and the King County Library also be on hand to answer your questions. This wi tect, will e your opportunity to comment on the library and make suggestions to its designers. In addition to the upcoming public information meeting, the Planning Commission will review the design of the new library at a future public hearing. Below is the schedule for the two meetings: PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING: • Where: City Hall bouncil &ambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA • When: PLANNING • Where: • When: COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING": City Hall &ouncil ehambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA Thursday, March 24, 1994 7:00 p.m. Mark your calendars for these dates and plan to attend. Your new library needs your ideas! M E M O R A N D U M T O F I L E FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler Department of Co nity Development RE: Public meetingfre: preliminary design 10/7/93 DATE: October 8, 1993 At evening public meeting 10/7/93, architects Boe, Wong presented model, site plan and elevation for new Foster Library. Answered questions regarding mostly building design and site design. Library's Ptacik answered questions on services, etc. Libary's Blair gave overview of their proposed permit and construction schedule. Most attendees were associated with Library (Board, Friends, or librarians), or City Council (Hernandez, Eckberg, Mayor), or City (Ann, Doerschel). Only about 2 -3 "citizens." Key issues: 1) Site plan: Building pushed to corner of 42nd & 144th. Parking at back. Entry on west side (near south end of wall). I have concerns about pedestrian circulation, and relationship of building to street, to high school, and to residential areas to north. Also, there are no outdoor areas for patrons, no public art or public spaces. Remnant single - family house is ignored. 2) Building design: Building is one story, with conference room windows at street corner, entry portico on west side. Sounds like main material will be something like Dryvit. I have concerns about materials; scale of low building adjacent to high school; vault -like building with no windows and little detailing; about non - welcoming face to pedestrians and streets. 3) Landscaping: No landscape plan yet. I have concerns about lack of street trees, large area devoted to a bioswale, screening, aesthetics, lack of public spaces. 4) Citizen asked about readerboard. Library's Blair responded that City does not allow off - premise signs, that School had received City approval for readerboard but that School hadn't pursued it due to budget. Lamb responded that, no, it was locational issue. cc: Rick Beeler Jack Pace v1 ► tlYli ►Lti PRE- APPLICAT'ON PROCESS • MEETING ATTEIJANCE RECORD CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development - Building Division Phone: (206) 431 -3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #10t Tukwila Washington 98181 PRE- APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: 10 -21 -93 TIME: 3:15 SITE ADDRESS: 4060 S 144 ST DATE CHECKLIST MAILED: 10 -22 -93 BY: DLM STAFF PRESENT NAMES / TITLES ® Building (431 - 3670) Bob Benedicto /SR Plan Examiner Et Fire (575 -4404) Mike Alderson /ASST Fire Marshal ® Planning (431 -3680) Ann Siegenthaler /Associate Planner ❑ Public Works (433 -0179) ® Parks & Rec (433 -1843) Don Williams /Parks & Recreation Director ❑ Police (433 -1804) ® Permit Center (431 -3670) Denise Millard /Permit Coordinator ® Other: ( - ) Rick Beeler /Chairman APPLICANT / REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT Contact Name David Boe, AIA Person Company/Title Architects Reed Reinvald Others Present Phone 572 -3993 Street Address 201 North I Street . City /State/Zip Tacoma, WA 98408 Name Douglas Blair.. Phone 684 -6694 Company/Title K.C.L.S. Architectural Project Coordinator Street Address 300 8th AV N Name David E Dorothy City /State /Zip Seattle, WA 98109 Phone 455 -9494 'Company/Title Barrett Consulting Group /Consulting Manager Street Address 10800 NE 8 st.- 7th Floor City /State /Zip Bellevue, WA 98004 Name Stephen Wong AIA Phone 572 -3993 Company/Title Architects Reed Reinvald Street Address 201 N I Street Name Elizabeth Gibson -Scott City /State /Zip Tacoma, WA 98408 Phone 454 -5723 • Companymtle Landscape Architec - Jongejan Gerrard McNeal Street Address 23 103RD AV City /State /Zip Bellevue WA 98004 Name Phone Company/Title Street Address City /State /Zip CITY OF TUKWILA Permit Center Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard — #100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Pre-Application PROJECT 'SUMMARY FOR STAFF USE ONLY Project/Name: FO4W. 1,16121.%12:11 Site Address: 40(00 5.144 .4%' wri-iu wit.A Pre -App File No.: (7-Eq3-C) Date Received: 10-15- C3 Meeting Date: 10- R 1- 93 Time: : 15 Routing: O Building Q Fire Q Pub Wks 0 Planning 0 Police 0 Pks & Rec Will the project be developed in phases? O No . g Yes If "Yes ", describe: pits. 1H N,(, rot.. AN p117t7►'CidL U :..: PROJECT :INFORMATION Project/Name: FO4W. 1,16121.%12:11 Site Address: 40(00 5.144 .4%' wri-iu wit.A Description of Proposal: CONi ialGiloN OF A s1 E,WH Z� S• U b ''F't �o�� "�' W & Om C� r�-t+cl oN) . Assessor Account No.: 15230 4 -qo 13 -08 Acreage of Site (gross): 1, 16. Anticipated Period of Construction: From A.U1U,AN f VO 4.. To epilog(, 10,6 Will the project be developed in phases? O No . g Yes If "Yes ", describe: pits. 1H N,(, rot.. AN p117t7►'CidL U 2,600 s .F To Is& oU for e b 114 -( e. p t j L Identify existing easements on sites&. An isetit, ( 4& (( Tf QOPo imp v ) BUILDING INFORMATION Project Value: $ 5/31, Z 50• _pO Current Assessed Value of Building: sJ 4, Total Building Square Footage: 62.,.o s •F Type of Construction: Tr*. \/...N (1991 UBC) 'Please indicate the square footage of each floor, broken down by building use(s); use another sheet for additional floors. . BUILDING USE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONISOUARE FOOTAGE 1st Floor I t,l ROM �.Z 1 Z 3S°5 � s.. F. 1`F 5)9 3e Prepared by: OA'R 2 p s Date:11 ocroge . 1)3 II 1- (0 4eD s -F Floor NI/Pk �Pk L'?i '� Z6-0s. I I TOTAL I 3rd Floor NA I . TOTAL I Number of parking stalls proposed: Regular: Z4. Compact: Handicapped: Z. Storage or use of flammable, combustible or hazardous materials on premise or area of construction? ONo (Yes If "Yes", explain: 01/12!93 PROJECT INFORMATION Contact Person: pa h0 Ij(& .MGfis Company: e5f,yj Ptl.hivA-1-b Address:2,01 tom} S s'112..E,?,TIT"aMt,„ wiz, 0840s phone: (20072..-.6•D93 Prepared by: OA'R 2 GOS, Date:11 ocroge . 1)3 01/12!93 PRE-APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUIL DING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE- APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: Oct 21. 1993 TIME:3:15 SITE ADDRESS: 4060 S 144 ST g. ta!mments;areba spoAin .a preliminary revieLv. Additional;inforration may be Other. :requirements /regulations' may media be met. • PLANNING DIVISION -- Land Use Information Comply with Tukwila Municipal Code (zoning, land use, sign regulations, etc.) 2. Obtain the following land use permits /approvals: CJ Boundary Line Adjustment ( ) Rezone ED Building Site Improvement Plan Shoreline Management Permit ( ) Comprehensive Plan Amendment () Shoreline Management Permit Rev. (Conditional Use Permit Cl Short Subdivision Design Review C) Sign(s) L.) Design Review - Interurban (J Subdivision Environmental (SEPA) ( ) Unclassified Use Fp Planned Mixed Use Development ( ) Variance LJ Planned Residential Development ( ) Other: 3. Zoning designation: Site located in sensitive area? 4. Minimum setback requirements: Front: 5. Maximum Building Height: Yes lS / Side: Height exception area? No 0_ Rear: 10 Yes RNo 6. Minimurn parking stalls required: '�,tnvt►�w1 Handicap stalls required: I /lib 7. No more than 30% of required parking stalls may be compact. No landscape overha gs iYin o compact stalls are permitted, although no wheel stops prior to hittin the curb will be required. 8. Minimum landscaping required: S16. 6v Side: Rear: 9. Landscape plans must be stamped by a Washington State licensed landscape architect. All landscape areas require a landscape irrigation system (Utility Permit Required). 7 10. Roof -top mechanical units, satellite dishes and similar structures must be properly screened. Pro lid elevations 7�d construction details as part �oib� ding permit application submittal. tt. 5. -,6r w 1370, ►R. i I 11. Trash enclosures ah'd stora�as must be screened to a minimum of 8' in height. Provide 9 9 elevations and construction details as part of building permit application submittal. 136.4. 12. Building permit plans which deviate from that already approved by the Board of Architectural Review may require re- application for design review approval. ;i L. ri _J 1.3. 14. 15. 16. 0214 _Ia/KdAc 17. 18. Li 19. DeA 20. Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: .situ '-atVikAt _1= CITY OF TUKWILA PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION– PERMIT CENTER 6300 Soulhcenler Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9616E Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: Oct. 21, 1993 . TIME: 3:15 SITE ADDRESS: 4060 S 144 ST X„ �• (wp�'S" "V""7,C".,'��1 • ti�e`N4� rte:4eitv 1 ct �� :�?.• flt ± f �` :. •The?' vi r»emt/ ►�► ►�'Y n° BUILDING DIVISION 1. Comply with the Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition. tt(s, 2. Comply with the Uniform Mechanical Code, 1991 Edition. 4tIS 3. Comply with the Washington State Energy Code, 1991 Second Edition. Provide energy calculations stamped by a Washington State licensed architect or engineer (see attached format). No-ce eseLoW. 4. Comply with Wachin_ - - • ., . LS.t3.G. C%4 31 ens AMM6NflEi� tic WA STATE BetTc oi►Acoots c t4CtL. weZ- cArs$utwtuctcope C tie st -zo Wb.c. 5. Apply for and obtain the following Building Division permits and approvals through the Permit Center: v/ Building Permit • Rack Storage Mechanical Permit • Demolition (building) • Other: 6. All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 7. Construction drawings must be stamped by a Washington State licensed architect. '6.IrotaE0 4..PATED 8. Structural drawings and calculations musl be stamped ,b r a Washington Stated licensed structural engineer. STRtar.ZtSRAL plat4 REUIf;lW sot 'Roe,' t" Feast n Aszo..— r4251vNC'fb Ptah R6UlFtt.)4000,1/EWt'S 9. A boundary survey prepared by a Washington State Registered Land Surveyor muse fitted as part of the Building Permit application. 10. Temporary erosion control measures shall be included on plans. Normally, no site work will be allovfec until erosion control measures are in place. 11. Rockeries are not permitted over 4' in height. Retaining structures over 4' in height must be engineered retaining walls, and require a permit. 12. All rack storage requires a permit and rack storage over 8' high must be designed for Seismic Zone 3. A Washington State structural engineers stamp will be required on plans and structural calculations submitted for rack storage over 8' high. 13. Construction documents shall include special inspection requirements as specified in Sections 302(c) and 306 of the Uniform Building Code. Notify the Building Official of testing lab hired by architect or owner prior tc permit issuance date. The contractor may not hire the testing lab. 14. Construction documents shall contain soils classification information specified in Table 29 -B of the Uniform Building Code, stamped and signed by Washington State licensed architect or engineer in responsible charge of the structural design work. 15. Demolition permits are required for removal of any existing buildings or structures. 16. Comply with UBC Appendix Chapter 35, Sound Transmission Control (R -1 occupancy group). 17. Obtain approvals and permits from outside agencies: ixELECTRICAL PERMIT /INSPECTIONS are obtained through the Department of Labor and Industries j1��ji (248- 6630). PLUMBING PERMIT /INSPECTIONS are obtained through King County Health Department (Inspec- tions: 296 -4767; Permits: 296- 4727). KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT must approve and stamp plans for public pools /spas and food service facilities prior to submittal to the Tukwila Building Division (296- 4787). IXFIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS plans are reviewed through the Tukwila Fire Department (575- 4404). • 18. ibutAiL dCT1Q CaMall iNE ,19C4 LL tS B SECfloN of THE WASHt TAT IJER(,ci E t �G TQ�r}� tSEA_lDN3 !v_►t.''.���1� tN ADOt nnoN 'td pu. 1994 Fornort, of 19. UKIItrOR -M CODES t4br t L pt�Eai 20 Checklist prepared by (staff): Date: icy l CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION— PERMIT CENTER PEKE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST 6300 Soufhcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9818:: Telephone: (206) 431 -36: :' PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: oct 21., 1993 TIME: 3:15 SITE ADDRESS: 4060 S 144 ST The following comments are based on a preliminary review. , : Additional, information.nzay.beneeded.; Othersequirements /regulations nay-,need#obemet. FIRE DEPARTMENT - Construction Information X.1. The City of Tukwila has adopted the 1991 Uniform Fire Code. This and other nationally recognized standards will be used during construction and operation of this project. (TMC 16.16.120) 12. Fire hydrants will be required. (City Ord. #1626) f i 3. Required fire hydrants shall be approved for location by the Fire Department, approved for purity by the Water Department, and fully in service prior to start of construction. By line of vehicular travel afire hydrant must be no further than 150 feet from a structure; and no portion of a structure to be over 300 feet from fire hydrant. (UFC 10.301 and City Ord. #1626) 4. Automatic fire sprinklers are required for this project. Sprinkler systems to comply with N.F.P.A. #13. Sprinkler pins shall be submitted to Washington State Surveying and Rating Bureau, Factory Mutual or Industrial Risk Insurers for approval prior to being submitted to Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval. Submit three (3) sets of sprinkler drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. (City Ord. #1626) 5. Maximum grade is 15% for all projects. 6. Hose stations are required. (City Ord. #1626) A fire alarm system is required for this project. (City Ord. #1626) Plans shall be submitted to the Tukwila Fire Marshal for approval, prior to commencing any alarm system work. Submit three (3) sets of complete drawings. This includes one for our file, one for company file, and one for the job site. x9 Special installations of fixed extinguisher systems, fire alarm systems, dust collectors, fuel storage, etc. require separate plans and permits. Plans to be submitted to the Fire Marshal prior to start of installation. (UFC 10.301) Portable fire extinguishers will be required in finished buildings per N.F.P.A. #10. (Minimum rating 2A. 10 BC) 10. Buildings utilizing storage of high piled combustible stock will require mechanical smoke removal per Section 81 of the 1991 UFC. . During construction, an all- weather access will be required to within 150 feet of the building. (UFC 10.207) 2. No building will be occupied, by people or merchandise, prior to approval and inspection by Fire and Buildina Departments. Adequate addressing is required. Number size will be determined by setback of building from roadway. Four inch numbers are minimum. Numbers will be in color which contrasts to background. (UFC 10.208) X14. Designated fire lanes may be required for fire and emergency access. This requirement may be established at the time of occupancy and /or after the facility is in operation. (UFC 10.207 as amended) i 15.. Special Fire Department permits are required for such things as: storage of compressed gas, cryogens, dry cleaning plans, repair garages, places of assembly, storage of hazardous materials, flammable or combustible liquids or solids, LPG, welding and cutting operations, spray painting, etc. (UFC 4.101) Department vehicle access is required to within 150' of any portion of an exterior wall of the first story. Fire Department access roads in excess of 150' require aturn ar: und. Fire Department access roads shall be not less than 20' wide with an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13'6" (City Ord. #1632). R17. Adequate fire flow availability will need to be demonstrated for this project. 18. Checklist prepared by (staff): ,, _ H t. )' J Date: ra a?3 PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GUI:. DING DIVISION — PERMIT CENTER 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: Oct 21. 1993 TIME: 3:15 SITE ADDRESS:4060 S 144 ST FIRE DEPARTMENT- Inspections 1. Underground fire line from vault to riser a. Thrust block and roddino e. Hydrostatic test h. Type of pipe f. Fire Dept. approved plans c. Depth of cover g. Materials and test certificate d. Flush 2. Overhead sprinkler piping a. Hydrostatic test b. Trip test c. Alarm system monitoring test 3. �I S Underground tank a. Location b. Distance between tanks c. Distance to property line d. Depth of cover Fire alarm a. Acceptance test b. Fire Dept. approved plans Hood and duct inspections a. Installation b. Trip test in 6. Spray Booth a. Location b. Fire protection c. Ventilation d. Permit 7. l l 8. Flammable liquid room a. Location b. Fire protection c. Permit Rack storage a. Permit b. Mechanical smoke removal c. Rack sprinklers d. Aisle width . Fire Dept. approved plans e. Sprinkler head location and spacing e. Vent piping, swing joints, fill piping, discharge piping f. Anchoring g. Hydrostatic test h. Separate Fire Dept. approved plans 9, Fire doors and fire dampers a. Installation b. Drop testing Fire final a. Fire Dept. access b. Building egress and occupancy load c. Hydrants d. Building address 11. Other: a. b. c. d. e. Checklist prepared by (staff): '7i1'_ Fire protection systems: (1) Halon systems (2) Standpipes (3) Hose Stations (4) Fire Doors (5) Fire Dampers (6) Fire Extinguishers e 1 9 /l.L ,Soce Date* /0/4/3 PRA ARWSATION CHEO, ...1ST CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TUKWiLA BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER PUBLIC WORKS 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NO. PRE93 -028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE: ncr 21. tawl TIME:3:15 SITEADDRESS:4060 S 144 ST PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The following comments are based ona prelimlrrary review. Additional information may be. needed. Other requirements/regulations may need to be meL Ej 1. 9 Apply for and obtain the following permits /approvals through the City's Permit Center: ( ) Channelization /Striping /Signing CD Sewer Main Extension (private) (y,,/ Va4) 2) Curb Cut/Access /Sidewalk (sel'r //o. /4.)n Sewer Main Extension (public) 06/4.4-) ( ) (public) Storm Drainage (SEE- A29. r7) n Fire loop /Hydrant (main to vault),�,.oE on Water Main Extension (private) ( ) Flood Zone Control (zone X> ( ) Water Main Extension (public) ('?) Hauling (2.000 Bond. Cert. Ins.)�/�) () Water Meter (exempt)(vov./zt, /c /R.P/4Ar/N) 5b� ( ?) Landscape Irrigation(sE -mo. /B) 5) Water Meter (permanent)(wo --/.25) Moving an Oversized Load () Water Meter (temporary) ( —) Sanitary Side Sewer (4/ Other: 4.,n.:7/ A/ -cJ•i y 2. Hauling Permit required prior to start of any hauling of material on public right -of -way ($2,000 bond, $1,000,000 certificate of insurance, route map and $25.00 permit fee required). All applications and plan submittals must be complete in order to be accepted by the Permit Center for plan review. Use the Plan Submittal Checklist provided on the reverse of the application forms to verify that all the necessary materials and information has been supplied. 4. Water and sewer assessments may apply and will be determined during the utility plan review process.(Conidc.e h/D7r /-25' 47/ yac s,rvcr- ✓/stiv � • 5. Provide sidewalks per Ordinance Nos. 1158, 1217 and 1233, or obtain waiver. (s. E n/o. z ) fZI 6. Provide Hydrological - Geotechnical analysis. 7. Provide erosion control plan as part of rmit application. • 8. Identify building elevation above 100 year flood elevation per FIRM maps (use NGVD datum and recognized benchmarks). c�n:J O/iStri�'JfJ.?/� 9. Provide traffic analysis /trip generatiorstudy for: /„-.,osco/ -y /n, ; /..x:'ons o� cr./ii»�G /c9v/rm�n�S 10. Provide developers agreement for: „ot�,�- t�.�f!•- •�t�fh,s onol s/Sos.,/ -46Gp /Jey -S e/ •y iii o/i ✓rats. 11. Provide the following easements and maintenance agreements: ,ate /01 o {.io/r1. 100/ �/ eX -re . ) ��,� oir�n: • t1/2,- 1r� era i. ��-o/.,✓Jf on /91" 12. Provide water /sewer availability letters or certificates from districts serving your development. 13. Obtain METRO Waste Discharge permit or approval (684- 2300). .Bust ncsS , Fcc %r .Y!• n.^ /�t1:� riico() 14. Complet and return to METRO (self addressed and stamp provided). 15. Review the following City studies when designing your project and preparing your plan submittal: -Q /i'n ..»fir .. •Aare /1'd ,2/ / /ZJe,bnIPZ /2,5iJ E16 741.:s Aer,,, t rr. // carer / . eG rv.? 4/f 1C2=-111 Br. -n'r. S S'.• .2'M /A= 44151. j�Ut✓. y /.a s , �. /A7,.7�✓n� s "it .- own !n 45e-de M17 Tries .:r As1D# /. 5-; 4 »wvcr /ry7idn / , -,. o ;/f_)// +lsa ���n/� rri C. tr stance ✓n /j . 775.e Cit�tnca./lJ.9cs 18. , ,- L>'/ /Jton �G -_ of �/✓s� -p .e /Cr ✓nG'y /,nl. �.s' whim ./o qo.� ��-%�� irr.:ft.at`•onJ9q, N✓ 44"to micro?,) d/ra..■n.+qe �r.✓n ea me 7 e i >nc/ iC tom/ .,e4 /c rris.S Cray 1 .2' --4rC. 2 19. s /'rnJi•r re Pi' .<.‘" :"ran, 45'..a%i/t'r�4.1,e `'' n.r fu ;.tiOr �vdeLcnE.in IJw / ✓• n Jav {�ceiYJtrr y 'n �Jnv.a� / 20. J ��l. /' z Checklist prepared by (staff): j CITY OF TUKWILA S.' PRE - APPLICATION CHECKLIST DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION - PERMIT CENTER • 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 PRE - APPLICATION FILE NOPRE93 - 028 PROJECT: FOSTER LIBRARY MEETING DATE:ort 21. 1993 TIME5:15 SITE ADDRESS4O60 S 144 ST { The following comments are based an apreliminary review. ditional.lnformatlon maybe needed.: Otherrequirements /regulations may need to be met. POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION SECURITY RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Doors: Doors should have quality .locking mechanisms with minimum one inch deadbolt locks. All exit doors shall be operable from the interior without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. The Crime Prevention Unit should be contacted for information regarding correct hardware usage at 433 -1823. 2. Security Alarm: Recommend installing a security alarm system during construction that would report a burglary in progress when the library is closed. 3. Restrooms: Recommend that the restrooms that are open to the general public not have false ceilings. There have been problems with subjects hiding in the ceiling area and then dropping down later to do robberies. Also ceiling areas have been used to hide merchandise wrappings. 4. Windows: Consideration should be given to providing hardened coverings (such as security film, etc.) for ground level windows where glass breakage would allow for access to building interiors by burglars. 5. Orientation of Windows: Windows should be located so that the parking lot area can be easily surveyed by employees inside the library. Also the windows should be located so that a patrol car passing by can easily survey inside the library. 6. Graffiti Prevention Program: It is important to win the war against the graffiti "artist" and keep your building attractive. New non -stick anti - graffiti water -based or wax like coatings are now available to make an effective barrier against graffiti or other potentially staining substances. Contact the crime prevention unit for further information. 7. Landscaping: Plant materials should be placed and maintained so to provide visibility and prohibit hiding places for unauthorized people around ground level door and window areas. Sticker shrubs may discourage crime activities. Low shrubs and umbrella trees (where the canopy is maintained above five(5) feet from the ground) will allow surveillance opportunities, hence reducing the potential for criminal behavior. 8. Lighting: Energy efficient security lighting is a relatively low -cost, yet extremely effective way to protect the library and its visitors. By providing sufficient lighting in the parking lot and around your building you will discourage burglars and vandals who don't like light, preferring the cover of darkness for their dirty work. Also the lighting will provide a legitimate sense of security for the employees and the visitors. Checklist prepared by T. Kilburg (433 -1823) 10/19/93 CITY OF TUKWILA PRE- APPLICAM)N CHECKLIST DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION — PERMIT CENTER . 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 The following comments are based on a preliminary review. Additional Information may be needed. Other requirements /regulations may need to be met. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Parks and Recreation Department will serve in an advisory capacity to DCD concerning outdoor passive /educational areas to be developed on site. "Park areas" are not required by park regulations; however, the owner is asked to work in partnership with the City to provide safe, visible "people" areas. Benches or seating areas are strongly encouraged. In addition, educational opportunities exist with the biofilter drainage system. Outdoor public art is another possibility. Which ever option the owner may choose should be coordinated with the Park and Recreation Director and shown on site plans. The City Council has indicated a willingness to add up to $25,000 to enhanced "people" areas or additions that would be added to the development that are clearly above what is required by the City. Funding for the development would be handled as part of a formal agreement between the Library District and the City. Stafacifietimprovements to the site would have to be specific and clearly defined. c4v/e- apa" C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler DATE: October 26, 199 TYPE: In person WITH: David Boe, Doug Blair, Jack Pace Purpose of meeting to review site plan issues. Doug wants to resolve site plan issues asap, esp. if building needs to be moved. All agreed that bldg. design issues also need to be discussed, but can wait for next meeting. David explained rationale for current site plan. Ann clarified that City is enthused about new library, staff pleased to see that designers have been conscientious in evaluating issues and trying to resolve them, that they are concerned also about quality. Staff committed to working with designers to iron out issues and keep project on schedule for February hearing. However, staff and community has concerns about proposed site plan. Ann explained concerns about site plan (same as list given to him at Pre -App). David reviewed previous alternatives he'd proposed to Library. Many of same issues Ann raises they tried to resolve in earlier alternatives. Main areas of disagreement were building orientation to 144th and 42nd, and lack of "pedestrian - friendly" circulation and grounds. Ann & Jack liked elements of previous alternatives. Some of these elements plus others should be incorporated into new site plan: strong statement at corner, passive outdoor spaces such as plaza, strong building elements at north end & south end /corner, pathways /spaces and entry treatment which appeal to pedestrians. All agreed on the desirability of these concepts, although how to specifically achieve may differ. Ann suggested that David try to combine these elements into new alternatives (one or two) which also meet Doug's program requirements. All seemed to think it is possible to come to agreement in this way. David will fax Ann some preliminary concepts. After review, staff will meet with them again to 1) discuss site plan, and 2) building design. We discussed desirability of more windows, better detailing, quality materials, stronger building statement at north & south ends, entry portico to be more visible. At next meeting, David will be prepared with more info on building design, materials and changes so far. e /: 1 D. 2 7. 9 3 0 8 : 5 8 ATMI ARCH ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD P44.4446/014AK.oreatiAittg cstr lliKtotlix REED RE I N V A L D RECEIVED OCT 2 71993 CU►vMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE 1D-27.03 COPIES TO P 0 1 201 NORTH i STREET TACOMA, WASHINGTON 98403 206 572 -3993 FAX 206 572 -1445 D. Butiu2- :.• eu:Vscorr- 4bM u.z & - Fu eiH 'tD oue MW `f e3't,2OA r t. WE rug ate0 OD Win L $ 2;VtSWt 4& aptivAtt41S IRS .131,C6. go As PSi2 A P1249401% 66-1544E- , au rr opF NORtF scArtimi it. ewe PEA t Acctss PpM E. 4014 M1Q - >A{ »UoUs. Luc.- "riatE42 1201 ll∎Cp enit Burl. tolkPT 96 °•: irr ouE., se r'Sa£.rS 4 -u) -p -016 BUlupit (c,01- 14kut. 6eNoff tS 6 *We*. of A 'M •IL 21A2p.' We (-git r( aba Nay' o4P901441b4v 1a 1NE Sti1f.Ne- Was Dg11tt.0944; hlaWztlb2, 144641. itU& vtIiqA'rI Ltp 'la A saF, 'PUNPI 617iA ws 04f_. PMCK LitcrtEo AskAl1' (sr: pzTid*Fo a•). Wf. Ni(s1V) "t61S BU11,oIN6 1�� rat P S`iNlvl44�ela+L �s RtLt'Ciog S+jLter IgpCSfetal�OfaI�IDJP[D A �/% �MI.L P�Cp�S[It.tb[%I elyl�{' '1a 1444k � 1,£$S paw/ 1 tater LIM° _� � a.�.�►.w a�n)�r� tom► -ttl toffier of, rail cle" aJ uC� c fraf.os5� -� (isr. u►smitst. C-aom h1- AoI6pAdAsss 14g. std. t. NOT pitzteva4m. ID -os _ebe4aN6. (gow ,mot 60€7e. irssrw cF Asti av ) IJ. 2'7. 93 0 8: 5 8 AM *ARCH REED REIN A L D P 0 2 MI 94i itZ • •. �5.� 1 `Y - - ►. t?,,lrill") 'Vtgagillinglirailliallialt 't •t" 1 113. 2 7 . 93 08 : 58 mormimol 1"1 V• • aro imPF *ARCH REED RE INYALD PAbit Logi f , .�,.t . • '1 • • ;t f r - ". 1 7-5- mil : Ji , ., ... ..(% ,1,!„ .____,. I INN II iiiiiimuim iminkla 11 112p1111111111111U1 0111111111 t ...i'it'i';'1. a .&:. v, .,:.it. .� Vim' w Fl • • • P 0 3 • "410Legnem., 41.101k ,t 11111111111. 11111111Magir ARV , 1;1 •;r j 4 *% ‘444jt2 3/3 C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: November 2, 1993 TYPE: In person WITH: David Boe, Steve Wong, Doug Blair, Dave Kistler (observer only) Net to discuss site plan revisions fax'd by Boe (10/27/93). Building location /orientation to 144th: West side of building has been pushed out somewhat & 2 stalls removed which gives more room for creating a stronger statement at entrance. Building orientation to north neighborhood: "Pop -out" window area of north facade, plus idea of an outdoor space there, has potential for more welcoming face to north neighborhood. Building orientation to 42nd: Changes to 144th orientation and north facade add interest to otherwise bleak appearance along 42nd. Architects also working on better detailing & more window area for this facade. Entry: Entry now has much better relationship with 144th, more visible from intersection and from north. Continuing portico idea across driveway also makes entry more visible, and makes it "eventful." Public outdoor spaces: Site plan starting to provide the kinds of outdoor public spaces that help make the library welcoming and "belong" to the neighborhood. Idea of grander, more formal entry court works, with subordinate spaces to west & at north facade. Bioswale not mandatory. Therefore, large area devoted to bioswale can be considered for public space. Could be terminated at both ends with a repeat of the pergola structure, like formal garden. Landscaping: Still needed. New site plan submitted by architects at same meeting. Has further refinement of 10/27 plan. Building pushed out further west, with bioswale area reduced. This reduces opportunities for open space along west edge. However, advantage is it allows much better entry areas on north and south, which are more important. Very nice outdoor space can be achieved at the north side, to draw people in. continued Foster Library 11/2/93 meet Pergola on west side has been removed. Should consider including, as it strengthens entry and "captures" more of the site vs. looking like leftover area spilling down to road. Achieving this w /landscaping (e.g. poplars) might also work. Entry court working much better; looks more like courtyard than path. Sitting walls good idea; functional, helps open up the corner to the neighborhood, deals with slope. Look at pulling back wall a little from entry walk, and also incorporating into garden area. Good idea to look at incorporating signs into wall design. Arts Commission could be involved in some public art for entry court. Outdoor area at north facade could be better designed to be a "outdoor room" rather than just path. Can do with landscaping; maybe incorporate public art. Building design: Architects have made some revisions in facades to address previous staff concerns. Added bank of windows to project out slightly from north facade; brings light at night, adds friendly "face," and interest. Have enlarged windows at north staff lounge. This helps make north entry more inviting. Also enlarging windows and more detailing along 42nd. These changes are going the right direction, beginning to address staff concerns. Materials: Dryvit, sculpted dryvit, and stone -like dryvit materials are proposed. Advantages are lower cost, ability to mimic (somewhat) more expensive materials, and can be sculpted to create deep detailing around windows, etc. Disadvantages are that materials are not as high quality as brick /stone /tile, not as "touchable" as others, small scale of library means blemishes are more noticeable, if not used carefully they can really look cheap. For these reasons, these materials may not be acceptable for this library. I'm not convinced that disadvantages can be overcome. Architects need to submit materials and color board. Also think about using better materials in areas where patrons will be close up. Doug mentioned that they used stone in Bellevue library. Building materials is the area where staff & architects /Library seem to really diverge. Left it at "we'll wait & see if you can convince us." Process: Architects will have the engineer resolve bioswale issue, and do storm calcs, prior to firming -up site plan. L.A. will then do landscape plan. Blair will resolve with Ron Cameron what is needed for traffic study. Blair will submit results of soil testing with SERA checklist. Encouraged them to get applications in right -away. Once they resolve these few bigger issues, they will submit what they can. Conceptual site plan & elevations as shown in meeting are sufficient for applications; we'll refine before BAR. A=17 . Goa )frZ i cc 3' 4� //, 5/ �✓lr�n 5-44 • _120tc0 c � ry ,r1/2 arcs 6r c arru�e� 5 __...+. C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: December 28, 1993 TYPE: Phone WITH: David Boe, Architects Reed Reinvald David confirmed that March 24, 1993 hearing date is OK. Boe talked with Doug Blair and Library Board. Explained to them how March would allow public info meeting, more resolution of issues prior to hearing, etc. Board feels that March would be fine (that it might even provide a cost savings ( ? ?)). David believes that some later tasks can proceed more quickly, and that he can still keep project on schedule. All have agreed to March 24, 1993 public hearing. C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: January 6, 1994 TYPE: In person WITH: Dave Kisler Dave came in to check status of Foster Library applications. Received a couple of weeks ago. He was concerned about how long it was taking architects to get application in. Scheduled for March 24 BAR review. Public information meeting also planned for sometime in February. The date /time /place not decided yet, nor how it will be advertised. Staff will be responsible for coordinating logistics and deciding on format. I will give Dave more info as soon as I have more info. 7.:k'e %h z; NEW FOSTER LIBRARY f-17`The7,4<-7 I. CITY REVIEW PROCESS: Early conceptual meetings with staff Pre - Application meeting with all departments Application submittal: • SEPA Environmental Review (all depts.) • Conditional Use Permit (Planning Commission) • Design Review (Board of Architectural Review) Revisions with staff Public comments: • Hazelnut • Letter to residents • Public information meeting 2/15 , • Quasi - judicial review: limitations on PC /BAR and Council discussion Public hearing 3/25 (PC /BAR) Revisions with staff Building permit II. DESIGN FEATURES: Project data: • Site = 1.15 acre • Building = 5250 s.f., incl. 500 s.f. meeting room Height = 24 feet • 26 parking stalls (20.visitors, 6 staff) • Hours: 8 am -8pm • Street improvements: Sidewalk, street trees Site plan: • . 144th & 42nd intersection very important intersection • Bldg. located in corner to give prominence, screen parking • Entry & parking on "inside" = challenge for other sides • Relationship to north neighborhood users • Relationship to high school • Relationship of entry to 144th Building: • Small size of building relative to high school • Constraints on windows • Constraints on floor plan circulation • Materials • Entry: .importance of entry experience via auto or ped • Lighting' Landscaping: • Setting for building • Framing of building • Screening of service areas • Outdoor spaces: inviting, • Public art • Details: .paving, seating, & parking lot safe, ped /auto /bike conflicts walls, stairs ■ City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Rick Beeler, Director January 26, 1994 Dear Resident and Property Owner: The new Foster Library is coming to your neighborhood. Plans have been drawn up to transform the vacant lot at South 144th and 42nd Avenue South into a new library. Your neighborhood has been interested and involved in other new civic buildings, such as Foster High School Like the High School, the new Foster Library will be an important focal point for the community. We want to know what you think of the new library's design. You can bring your questions and comments about the new Foster Library to two upcoming meetings: • Public information meeting: An information meeting, in February, is intended to. answer your questions and to get your suggestions on the library design. Comments received at this meeting will be forwarded to the Board of Architectural Review. • Board of Architectural Review public hearing: The Board of Architectural Review will make the final decision on the library's design. If you are unable to attend the February information meeting, you can make your comments in person at the Board's design review hearing in March. The meeting schedule is printed on the reverse of this letter. Your comments will help the library designers create a facility which best serves your community. If you can't attend either meeting but have questions or comments, feel free to give me a call (431- 3670). Sincerely, Ann Siegent aler Associate Planner 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 NEW. FOSTER : LIBRARY PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING: DESIGN REVIEW PUBLIC HEARING: • Where: Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 6200 Southcenter Blvd. • When: Tuesday February 15, 1994 6:30 -7:30 p.m. - -- Same - -- Thursday March 24, 1994 7:00 p.m. C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: February 8, 1994 TYPE: Phone WITH: David Boe Called David with status check. Confirmed public info meeting 2/15. Preliminary review is complete, but I havent been able to get written letter to him yet. Waiting for final comments on the draft letter before letter can go out. In interim, I'd like to have meeting to review revisions contained in draft letter. I have some major concerns re: materials and design refinement. He will need to begin resolving those ASAP. Staff must have revisions in on time to prepare recommendations to BAR /PC; if we dont meet until next week, he will have to complete revisions within very short turn - around time. David's schedule doesnt allow him to meet this week, nor next Monday or Tuesday. Im at workshop all day next Wednesday and Thursday. Meeting set for next Friday 2/18 10:30. cc: File C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthale DATE: February 15, 1994 TYPE: Phone WITH: David Boe Boe received fax'd letter re: revisions (some pages didn't get through, need to send again). Boe believes items in letter raise significant issues regarding budget -- architects have no more in their budget for this phase. To resolve these issues will require new direction from Doug Blair; Blair may have to get direction from his boss(es). I reiterated City's position: the community will not accept anything but a high quality building. Boe feels they have really pushed the limits to get the library to the level of quality it is now, given KCLS budget. Other KCLS libraries are cheap wood frame buildings; it was a struggle to get new Foster Library to look as good as it does, given this type of budget. If Tukwila wants better materials or more work on design, we will have to negotiate this with KCLS. Boe cancelled meeting scheduled for 2/18. He will review issues with Blair first, then call me as soon as possible the week of 2/28 to reschedule. He anticipates that additional people from KCLS and City (the "chiefs ") will need to attend. In addition to budget concerns, Boe raised issue of project schedule. It will take Blair a lot of time to confer with his people at KCLS. Even if Blair agrees to do the kinds of design changes mentioned in my letter, these probably can't be completed in time for March 24 BAR hearing. I briefed Rick on this discussion. cc: File C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthale DATE: March 8, 1994 TYPE: Phone WITH: Doug Blair) kC -S Blair called with questions: 1) Parking: Confused by different standards given by different people. Got UBC standards from Bob B. which require parking based on occupancy type; Blair apparently averaged this to get 1 per 4 occupants, which led to original 26 stalls proposed. My letter suggests more are needed, due to multi - purpose room. I clarified that zoning code does not give standard, but leaves it up to Planning Commission. I've said all along that KCLS needs to demonstrate to PC that they have enough parking. Blair's handout on 3/4/94 is the first time they've responded to my concern. He can use 1 per 4 as a base and /or do comparison with other libraries; whatever method he uses, we need to show PC rationale and that parking is adequate0. Asked him for brief written explanation. He agreed. 2) 42nd Avenue streefimprovements: Perteet (engr. on 42nd) told him City is paying for all improvements, that KCLS wont have to contribute. Yet he is hearing that they will have to put in improvements at time of development (c /g /s are shown on proposal, so not an issue in MDNS). He needs to confirm this potential additional cost. I believe that Public Works intends for KCLS to pay their fair share, but I dont know when or how they will accomplish this. He needs to confirm with Ron Cameron. He agreed. 3) Project revisions: Blair just talked to Kay Johnson (I had left her earlier message), who met with Bill Ptacek. KCLS wants to move forward with current proposal. Minor revisions in site plan as discussed at our meeting 3/4/94 will be made; however, there will be no changes in materials. They will put together a "better presentation" and materials board. I did not discuss this further. 4) Hearing date: Blair confirmed that they want to get on April agenda. I will contact him & architects asap with deadline for submitting revisions and materials board. cc: File ... ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD Gil or-FAY W ILA Pro5. LE% g'ER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE 5 lei 4_ JOB NO. el-302. I ATTENTION 4j p.,6141-1,14, Leg. ofCavit-I4P1TY PE.V. RE Soo 6a111-1GeO1W- ISO 1,0/09-0 ST g. 11-116 01/A3 GENTLEMEN: 118.(5' aro-pz- 1-18426.rzy 206 +s 1.300 WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: O Prints 0 Plans 0 Samples 0 Specifications O Change order 0 O Shop drawings O Copy of letter COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: REMARKS For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval 114..For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submit copies for distribution O As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 Return corrected prints O For review and comment 0 O FOR BIDS DUE 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US 1-Ps4ldirr[1 r-16 k3 4tf4 or QIsa, 61-Te ?LAP) acx) Plitst.1 #6+19 T. eWV,Flot—iG . 440 1gAt-14MITTIkle:, PMTS W.4-1 or --R16 em 1-0,4 64 Id, if 'rcLA klAg it<1•4 qaegriode 1994 COPY TO 11 enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. SIGNED• ut....ovilveurAt i Y DEVELOPMENT Reply To: 201 North 1 Street Tacoma, Washington 98403 206 572-3993 4 Date: 2- Aug -94 12:32 From: ANN (ANN SIEGENTHALER) To: ALAN,RICK Copies -to: JACK Subject: Foster Library Status Message -id: E93C3E2E01AEAEAE The Planning Commission approved in June the new Foster Library design, with several conditions. The architect has been working with staff on revisions which implement those conditions. The architect, staff and Planning Commission will review the revisions at a public meeting on 8/25/94 at 8:00 p.m. in Council Chambers. A status update will be in the upcoming Hazelnut. The architect anticipates that they will apply for building permits sometime in November /December 1994; construction is scheduled to start in April 1995. C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: November 20, 1995 TYPE: Phone WITH: Art Seidell, Jongejan Gerrard McNeil (L.A.'s) of Protection of "saved" trees during construction: Art visited site. 1) Fill material has been pulled back away from elm as much as possible. 2) In a letter to contractor dated 11/13/95, he asked contractor to provide a drainage for the "pit" trench from elm to back of site as soon as possible. He is not sure when that will be accomplished; it may have to wait for landscape contractor, who is not yet on site. I stated this should be done no later than a week from now (already been a couple of weeks) to not jeopardize tree any further. However, LA did say he visited site after very heavy rain, and no standing water at all, so drainage may be quite good afterall. 3) Fill material has been pulled away from alders at back. When asked, LA said they did not appear damaged at all, but seem to him to be naturally on the decline. I explained that the proposal for saving these came from orginal LA's proposal, not staff. Next steps: 1) I explained that trees without much chance for survival will have to be eventually replaced, to satisfy design review requirements. Alders can be replaced now with more long -lived , if he and client want to spend $, but I will not require it unless they have been damaged. 2) LA will evaluate elm tree again in spring at leaf -out to ascertain health. If not likely to survive, he would propose replacing it with one large stature tree, as he feels no room on site to do more. 3 I will discuss solutions to the elm with LA after his spring evaluation. If building needs final approval before then, I will either a) require replacement of trees at that time, or b) require some sort of bond for future replacement. Art said Kay Johnson of library does not want to do bond, but I do not feel a letter of commitment would be adequate. cc: File ;$ .... C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: November 2, 1995 TYPE: Phone WITH: Art Seidell, Jongejan Gerrard McNeil (L.A.'s) Protection of "saved" trees during construction: Explained my concerns about trees to Art. He has also heard about them via the architect: a) Rear perimeter alder trees have fill piled up against trunks; b) fill covering 90% of large elm roots & elm down in a pit. L.A. has not been to the site. Asked him to do the following: 1) Go out to site immediately to get fill away from trunks as much as possible. 2) Propose a solution for, or address my concerns about drainage around elm. Evaluate its potential for survival. 3) Look at alders at perimeter to evaluate their potential for survival. 4) Call me to discuss status and recommend solutions. L.A. understood my concerns and will get back to me as soon as possible. cc: File C O N V E R S A T I a'N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler DATE: November 1, 1995 TYPE: Phone WITH: Kent McLaren, Arch's Reed Reinvald 1) Relocation of project sign due to electrical vault: Bob Giberson /Public Works says cost of moving electrical cabinet prohibitive. Also, when intersection is fully signalized in future, there will be even bigger electrical vault (the big ugly green things) at the library's corner. Advised architect to relocate project sign further into the site, Option #1 on his 10/6/96 fax'd site plan. Orientation as shown looks best, but he can adjust if necessary for best visibility. 2) Protection of "saved" trees during construction: My site visit showed a) rear perimeter alder trees have fill piled up against trunks; b) fill covering 90% of large elm roots & elm down in a pit. Reminded architect that BAR & CUP approvals based on these trees being saved. Elm was particularly an issue, with PC requiring removal of parking stalls to accommodate. Architect says that there was mix up between landscape architect and civil engineer - -no one anticipated that kind of elevation difference /grading problem. I do not have confidence that these trees will survive. Alders could be replaced w /other trees; elm is irreplaceable. requested: 1) Landscape architect needs to go out to site asap and work w /contractor to get fill away from trunks as much as possible. Needs to develop a solution to the "pit" and drainage around elm. 2) L.A. needs to call me next week to discuss status and recommend solutions. Solutions include going back to BAR (which arch. agreed is not feasible for schedule); or I may have to attach additional conditions to permit sign off, such as replacement landscaping or posting a bond. Architect will talk to L.A. and have L.A. call me. cc: File • M E M O T O F I L E el:Le C -PCft Page 1, Foster Library 1 29 TO: FOSTER LIBRARY DESIGN REVIEW L93- 0088 /BLDG. PERMIT B94 -0416 FROM: Ann Siegenthaler RE: Planning final inspection DATE: January 29, 1996 Inspected site w /Dave (Contractor site supervisor). Several items not completed, as noted below. 1. Landscape. Contractor provided bid materials I requested on 1/23. States approx. 20% of plants remaining & 100% of hydroseeding lawns remaining, which seems consistent w /site inspection. Appears all of trees are in, & most of shrubs /groundcover at entry walk (See Attachment A). Hydroseed window over until March; NEED DEADLINE ON LANDSCAPE BOND FOR MARCH 15, OR REQUIRE SOD. 2. Upper cornice color. Upper cornice was approved on color boards w /contrasting (brick red) color (see Attachment B). Actual color is not contrasting, more like "sand" color. CHECK W /ARCHITECT -- OVERSIGHT, OR VALID DESIGN RATIONALE? 3. Windows west (front) elevation. Windows on west elevation do not have center mullion; they are a single pane (see Attachment C). Dave says all operable windows could not have 2 panes, but did not give sufficient reason; says sub "glued" center mullions on 1 operable window on east facade, he can do same on west facade. I expressed concern re: looking like it's tacked on, and durability. Asked him to talk to architect and sub about more acceptable alternative. CHECK W /ARCHITECT. 4. Fence at north side. BAR- approved drawings call for fence along apts at north property line; BAR conditions also spell this out (see Attachment D). However, no fence installed here. There is fence along west, but contractor says he knew nothing about fence at north. Bldg. permit drawings do not clearly show fence at north, but could be interpreted as having a fence there. WILL NOT SIGN OFF UNTIL THIS FENCE IS INSTALLED. Page 2, Foster Library 1/29/96 5. Column capitals. Building's columns don't have capitals yet where they intersect roof plane. NEED BOND; 1 MONTH DEADLINE. 6. Bike racks. None installed yet as required by BAR. NEED BOND; 1 MONTH DEADLINE. . Bioswale sign. No sign yet at bioswale as required by BAR. NEED BOND; 3 MONTH DEADLINE. Page 1, Fostcr Library 2/1/96 CONVERSATION RECORD FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY ES REVIEW L93-0088/BLDG. PERMIT B94 -0416 FROM: Ann Siegenthaler DATE: February 7, 1996 TYPE: Phone WITH: Kevin Dunham, contractor 1. Windows west (front) elevation. I hadn't heard back from architect as to proposed solution to window mullions. Kevin said that he agreed to give architect a detail of window w /center mullion; has asked his subcontractor to provide. I alerted Kevin that I still wanted to review proposed solution before he has contractor install it. I'm ,concerned about durability and aesthetic quality, and want to resolve materials and costs issues with architect before everyone spends too much time /effort on a solution that doesn't work. 2. Fence at north side. Although Kevin and I agreed on temporary solution, architect has asked Kevin for cost estimate for permanent fence. Kevin says it will be same as one on west side. I prefer this permanent solution, but will accept temporary as discussed earlier. Kevin will check back with me in a few days. cc: ;., Design Review =File:: ; ;w i, ..aicr Library 2/1/96 CONVERSATION RECORD FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY DESIGN REVIEW L93- 0088/BLDG. PERIvi1T B94-0416 FROM: Ann Siegenthaler DATE: February 1, 1996 TYPE: Phone WITH: Kevin Dunham, contractor 1. Landscape. Contractor's bid materials provided on 1/26 are OK. 2. Upper cornice color. Kevin was concerned about this and was waiting to talk to architect. I said I discussed w/Kent and I decided this will not be an issue to hold up project; I'll approve as is. 3. Windows west (front) elevation. I reiterated to Kevin what I had discussed w/Kent today about missing center mullion, materials durability and aesthetic quality. A "glued on" center mullion will not be acceptable. Kevin agreed it's the architect's and Kay Johnson's call. Kent/Kay and I will work out solution by phone and fax; once that is worked out, then Kevin can put this item in his bond documents. 4. Fence at north side. I reiterated to Kevin what I discussed w/Kent regarding importance of north fence. We agreed it is architect's call as to how to resolve. I explained why I'm reluctant to let library open without a screening fence. Kevin suggested resolving with a temporary fence. Chainlink w /slats not acceptable, as this was specifically disallowed, may appear to public that it's final, and is not opaque to glare. Kevin suggested temporary solid plywood screen approx. 6' high. I agreed, as it will be obviously temporary, reasonable cost, and effective screen. Kevin thinks he can install in a day. Kevin will discuss w /architect and let me know. 5. Column capitals. OK to bond for this. 6. Bike racks. OK to bond for this. 7. Bioswale sign. OK to bond for this. esign-Review :File FILE: FOS :R LIBRAR FROM: Ann Si genthaler 4 :I. DATE: Febru . 1, 199.• TYPE: Phone WITH: Kent cLaren, architects - CONVERSATION RECORD Pat:: 1, :...tcr Library 2/1/96 N REVIEW L93-0088/BLDG. PERMIT B94 -0416 1. Landscape. 2. Upper corni Color rende is light color board. Sinc was on boar 3. Windows we windows, so concern to screening co approved an character of these don't mullion as with accepta to include c laying new me sketch a several time ontractor's bid materials provided on 1/26 are OK. e color. Kent said he also thought upper cornice would be darker. ing approved by BAR shows dark brick red, but dryvit material sample What's on site is exactly same material that's spec'd out on materials architect did not want to change this, and since materials match what I will not hold up project for this. 4. Fence at no I read him t approved pl concerned Neighbors lot lights. (proposed o 5. Column cap 6. Bike racks. 7. Bioswale sig t (front) elevation. Kent said window fabricator could not do 2 -paned ething to do with hardware, but he's not totally clear. I explained my ent: Given lack of center mullions, very narrow framing and coarse ering them, west elevation windows are quite different than what was aesthetically are very inferior to other windows on building. The whole west facade is degraded. Glazing on other windows looks very nice; ven look like they're part of the same building. "Tacking" on a center ent suggests is not acceptable. Explained I would like to see solution le quality and durability. This may involve re- fabricating entire frame nter mullion, re- soldering center to appear as integral part of frame, ame over the screen, whatever. Asked Kent to research solution & fax d description. Want to resolve by phone & fax, rather than redoing on site. h side. It appears that Kent didn't know about fence along north side. e condition from staff report, and that fence was shown on all the BAR - ns. I reiterated importance of this specific condition of BAR. I am bout impacts to residents on north if library opens without fence. BAR were concerned about headlights, people cutting through, parking ent will talk to contractor to see if they can get fence up by Monday ening day). tals. OK to bond for this. K to bond for this. . OK to bond for this. cc: ; Design Review File i '�� ' kJ t v v\1 F( LI Page 1, Foster Library 1/29/96 M E M O T O F I L E TO: FOSTER LIBRARY DESIGN REVIEW L93- 0088 /BLDG. PERMIT B94 -0416 FROM: Ann Siegenthaler RE: Planning final inspection DATE: January 29, 1996 Inspected site w /Dave (Contractor site supervisor). Several items not completed, as noted below. 1. Landscape. Contractor provided bid materials I requested on 1/23. States approx. 20% of plants remaining & 100% of hydroseeding lawns remaining, which seems consistent w /site inspection. Appears all of trees are in, & most of shrubs /groundcover at entry walk (See Attachment A). Hydroseed window over until March; NEED DEADLINE ON LANDSCAPE BOND FOR MARCH 15, OR REQUIRE SOD. 2. Upper cornice color. Upper cornice was approved on color boards w /contrasting (brick red) color (see Attachment B). Actual color is not contrasting, more like "sand" color. CHECK W /ARCHITECT -- OVERSIGHT, OR VALID DESIGN RATIONALE? 3. Windows west (front) elevation. Windows on west elevation do not have center mullion; they are a single pane (see Attachment C). Dave says all operable windows could not have 2 panes, but did not give sufficient reason; says sub "glued" center mullions on 1 operable window on east facade, he can do same on west facade. I expressed concern re: looking like it's tacked on, and durability. Asked him to talk to architect and sub about more acceptable alternative. CHECK W /ARCHITECT. 4. Fence at north side. BAR- approved drawings call for fence along apts at north property line; BAR conditions also spell this out (see Attachment D). However, no fence installed here. There is fence along west, but contractor says he knew nothing about fence at north. Bldg. permit drawings do not clearly show fence at north, but could be interpreted as having a fence there. WILL NOT SIGN OFF UNTIL THIS FENCE IS INSTALLED. Page 2, Foster Library 1/29/96 5. Column capitals. Building's columns don't have capitals yet where they intersect roof plane. NEED BOND; 1 MONTH DEADLINE. 6. Bike racks. None installed yet as required by BAR. NEED BOND; 1 MONTH DEADLINE. 7. Bioswale sign. No sign yet at bioswale as required by BAR. NEED BOND; 3 MONTH DEADLINE. FI1STII! GINNUNITYNEWS Sends" 1l t e RI sertoll, fo s te, a od T/i o ra dyke I Ye igDDoif o o ds Volume 2 Issue 3 January- February 1996 Library will open doors in Feb. D From this new desk, Foster's librarians will welcome patrons Feb. 6. The children's area is center, with the community room beyond elayed delivery of carpeting has postponed the opening of the new Foster Public Library, but the new King County Library System building at the corner of 42nd Ave. and 144th St. is now expected to open on the library's 511` anniversary day, Feb. 5. The library will close at its present location on Friday, Jan. 26 at 5 p.m. Books and other materials will be moved to the new building throughout the next week, and the library will open ` 7 at its new site at 11 a.m. on Monday, •:s Feb. 5. (Anyone wishing to volunteer to assist the moving process, or to help the librarians at any other time, should call Sharon Kidd at 242 - 1640.) — 1- -- A ribbon - cutting ceremony may mark the opening day, but a grand opening celebration will be held about a month later. From the outside, the new library F•�,"'`a building presents an image that is com- plementary to the new Foster High School immediately across 42nd. Both buildings feature brick and stucco as primary exterior surface materials. Visible at the top of the brickwork on mm What's inside: Library 1,5 Commentary 2 Comprehensive plan 3 Club info 4 Book reviews 5 Vacancies 5 Calendar 6 Schools 7 Road work 8 Community Center 9 the library are red -tile decorative medallions. From the parking lot on the west side of the building, a walkway leads to the open, in Inside, the new library offers more than double the amo with about 5,200 square feet. Like the existing library, the ne room, which is behind the bank of windows facing the corner of 42"d and 144t. Foster Community Club meetings will be held in the community meeting room of the new library when it opens in February. (The first club meeting at the new location will be Feb. 21, while the Jan. 17 meeting will be held in the current location at 42"" and 142"d.) viting entrance. unt of space of the existing library, ew Foster Library has a community Future use of the current library building is under discussion. The lease agreement for the library, which is on the Foster High campus, calls for ownership of the building to be passed to South Central School District if it is no longer used as a public library. The library was built on the high school grounds in (Continued on page 5) COMMUNITY CLUB CALENDAR Foster Community News 0 1996, Foster Community Club, Tukwila, WA. Subscription information, pg. 4. Jan. 17, 7 p.m., Foster Library: Regular club meeting; topics — projects, how to fund them, and other ideas. Feb. 21, 7 p.m., Foster Library: Regular club meeting; "white elephant" game; timely discussion topic? The club holds monthly meetings at Foster Public Library on the 3ni Wednesday from Sept. through June. Door prizes and refreshments end each gathering. Meetings are open to afl, so if you're interested, please come! For information about Joining the club, see page 4. Next issue of the News: early March. Page 2 FOSTER COMMUNITY NEWS Foster Community News staff: Editor Ron Lamb Reporters Kathy Doolin Sharon Kidd Nancy Lamb Betty Gully Mac McDonald Production Nancy Lamb Advertisements Donna Gully Nancy Lamb Special thanks Our advertisers, city and school officials, Dennis Robertson, Glen Turret, Earl Web, Oobu Joobu, I. M. Walrus, Piker, and Kiwi S. Peshelly. Editorial policy: Foster Community News, a publication of Foster Community Club, is produced and is distributed in Jan., March, May, Sept., and Nov. The News accepts display advertisements from family- oriented businesses and politi- cal candidates. For rates ($5 and up), call 243 -3716 or mail c/o 4251 S. 139th St., Tuk- wila, WA 98168. Mem- bers may place limited free unclassified ads. Letters to the editor must be signed by the writer and may be edit- ed for style, length, and appropriateness. The News may en- dorse local ballot measures, with mem- bership approval, but not candidates. COMMENTARY: One for the kids his one's for the kids. Let's not lose sight of that. Every second year at this time, voters are asked to approve a school tax levy. In the current political climate of cynicism, some are bound to wonder why. Why do the schools have to keep asking the public for money? Doesn't the state take care of that? Sadly, no, that's not the case. The state places many requirements and limitations on local school districts, but it provides only a portion of what it takes to operate an educational program. For example, the state and the courts say local school districts must provide an appropriate education for special needs students, such as children with learning disabilities. And schools should do that. But the state does not provide the full cost of those programs. Where, then, does the money come from? From local taxpayers through local tax levies, that's where. The state has imposed a cap on how much local school districts can raise locally, but it does allow local districts to ask voters to approve the local taxes. They just can't ask for more than two years' worth at a time. Oh, yes, and the vote has to be a supermajority 60 percent favorable. Oh, and did we mention that you need to have a sizable voter turnout, 40 percent of the turnout in the previous general election. Oh, and one more thing, the school district itself can't raise a finger or spend a dime to get a favorable vote. Have we forgotten anything? Oh, yes — we're reducing the percentage per student that you can raise locally. With such strictures, it couldn't be much more difficult to provide barely adequate resources for our public schools. And who gets caught in this squeeze? The kids, that's who. But the levy is essential. Local levy money goes to provide things that directly benefit the kids. Things like security at our schools to keep our kids safe. And smaller classes than the state funds so that our kids get more attention and can learn better. And computer labs to provide them with those vital technology skills they'll need in order to compete for jobs in our high -tech work world. And activities to channel their energy into positive directions. Local levy money provides these things. We can't do without this vital resource. We can't let the kids down. Foster Community Club recognizes the importance of public schools in our community. Our by -laws state `...we will strive to revitalize our predecessors' sense of the importance of schools and libraries...", and part of our purpose is "...encouraging legislation or other measures which would enhance the quality of life for residents of our neighborhoods ". At the December meeting, FCC membership en- dorsed the Feb. 6 South Central school levy. You can get specific information about the levy from the school district office (248 - 7565). FOSTER COMMUNITY NEWS Foster Library, continued (Continued from page 1) 1968 to replace temporary quarters in an old house nearby on the Foster campus. Its previous permanent location was in the Foster Community Hall, which was owned by the community club but was bought by the state and demolished to make way for the Interstate 5 freeway. Foster Community Club used the money it received from the state for the community hall to help build the current library building. Page 5 Despite the delay in the move to the new building, additional staff members are already at work. New library assistant Sandra Buskirk and pages Marcia Riquelme and LaJuanna Latsha join the current staff — library manager Sharon Kidd, children's librarian Celia Tomlin, lead library assistant Deatrice Barber, and library assistants Larisa Markarova and Sharon Tobalski. Non - English - speaking library users will find familiar voices at the new Foster Library. Ms. Riquelme speaks Spanish and Ms. Markarova speaks four European languages, including Russian. Ms. Latsha may be a familiar face to current library users; she has been a volunteer at the library. Ms. Buskirk lives in Tukwila and has children in South Central schools. + (Mac McDonald, Sharon Kidd, and Ron Lamb contributed to this article.) (See related photo on page 10.) New books at Foster Library "In the Woods: Who's Been Here ?" written and illustrated by Lindsay Barret George Pre - Reader - Fiction William and Canuny go for a walk in the woods and make many exciting nature discoveries - a great guessing game for readers!. The illustrations are beautiful, picturing the intricacies of nature as you find it. "Bizarre & Beautiful Tongues" by the Santa Fe Writers Group Juvenile - Nonfiction A good science book about the sense of taste, how it helps some creatures find each other, and how animals find good food while avoiding things that are harmful. Twenty different creatures are featured in an entertaining and informative way, with very good illustrations - both full - page photographs and drawings. "Beach Music" by Pat Conroy Adult - Fiction He's done it again! Pat Conroy, who makes every sentence a work of art, has written another wonderful novel every bit as good as "The Prince of Tides ", "The Great Santini ", "The Lords of Discipline ", and "The Water Is Wide ". If you have never read a Pat Conroy novel, start here and then read them all! "Beach Music" is a wonderful read. It will make you laugh, move you to tears, and give you much pleasure. All of Pat Conroy's novels have been made into movies (except his first, which is out of print), so read "Beach Music" before the movie! Sturdy canvas tote bags for your books are on sale for $5 at the kbrary. The Friends of Foster library created these unique bags to commemorate the fifti- eth anniversary of our local branch. "Joshua T. Bates Takes Charge" by Susan Shreve, illustrated by Dan Andreasen Juvenile - Fiction Who ever said fifth grade was easy? Joshua, after flunking third grade, was hoping to have a much better year. When he had to repeat third grade, he worked very hard and was promoted to fourth half way through. Now he hoped he could put that year behind him. Just when he thought things seemed to be back to normal, he's paired with a new fifth grader who wants to be his best friend. The class troublemakers, with their secret club, have other plans for the new boy and for Joshua. A sequel to "The Flunking of Joshua T. Bates ", it talks about coping with peer pressure, fitting in, and making hard decisions. offl "Cat Walk" by Mary Stolz, with drawings by Erik Blegvad Juvenile - Fiction " —so long as I get somewhere, " Alice added as an explanation. "Oh, you're sure to do that," said the Cat, "if you only walk long enough." —From Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll This is the story of a black kitten with huge white paws, six toes each. He wants to be someone's pet instead of a barn cat; he wants a name, too. When opportunity strikes, he becomes a pet and has a name of his own. But, his first home doesn't last, and he begins a journey of many names and many people. Does he ever find the name and the home he was really meant to have? Reading Always an adventure! from Kathy Doolin, FOFL Page 6 FOSTER COMMUNITY NEWS School board seat, city positions unfilled The application period for the vacancy in Director District 4 has been extended, according to South Central officials. No one sought to fill the vacancy during a December filing period. The new filing period is in effect through Jan. 29, 4 p.m. The person selected would serve less than two years, as the office would be up for election in the fall of 1997 to complete the four -year term. Applicants must be registered voters and live within South Central's District 4 boundaries, roughly described as 148th on the north, 160th on the south, I -5 on the east, and Military Road on the west. Interested persons should contact the district office at 248 -7565 for more information. The City of Tukwila also has a number of vacancies to fill in its volunteer boards and commis- sions. Call City Hall to request an application: 433 -1800. There are two seats open on each of the following: Library Advisory Board; Sister City Commission; Economic Development Advisory Board. One position each is open on the Board of Adjustment, Arts Commission, Civil Service Commission, and Planning Commission. There are minimal requirements to apply for these boards, with the em- phasis for a selection usually put on past experience and commitment to the city. + Community Calendar — selected events Sat., Jan. 13 — Gins basketball, Enumclaw at Foster, 7:30 p.m. Jan. 14 - Jan. 20 — South CentraVTukwila Diversity Week Mon., Jan. 15 — Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday (observed) Tues., Jan. 16 — Tukwila City Council regular mtg., city hall, 7 p.m. — Basketball, Vashon at Foster, boys 5:45 p.m., gins 7:30 Wed., Jan. 17 — Earty school release (secondary 11:30, elem. 12:45) — Foster Community Club, Foster Public Library, 7 p.m. v Thurs., Jan. 18 — Cascade View PSO, 6:30 p.m. — Thomdyke PSO, 6:30 p.m., site council, 7 p.m. — Duwamish Improvement Club, Peterson Hall, 7:30 p.m. Fri., Jan. 19 — Basketball, Seattle Chr. at Foster, girls 5:45 p.m., boys 7:30 Mon., Jan. 22 — Tukwila City Council comm. of the whole, city hall, 7 p.m. Tues., Jan. 23 — South Central School Board, regular mtg., 5:30 p.m. Wed., Jan. 24 — Concert, Showalter/Foster choirs, Foster High PAC, 7 p.m. Thurs., Jan. 25 — End of first semester of school year Fri., Jan. 26 — No school (report card preparation) — Wrestling, double dual meet at Foster, 6:30 p.m. Thurs., Feb. 1 — South Central Equity Task Force, admin. building, 5 p.m. — Foster Booster Club, Foster High staff room, 7 p.m. Fri., Feb. 2 — Groundhog Day — Boys Basketball, Life Christian at Foster, 7:30 p.m. Sat., Feb, 3 — Wrestling, Nisqually League tournament at Vashon Mon., Feb. 5 — Opening of new Foster Public Library, 11 a.m. — Tukwila City Council regular mtg., city hall, 7 p.m. Tues., Feb. 6 — Election Day (BE SURE TO VOTE) — Basketball, Orting at Foster, girls 5:45 p.m., boys 7:30 Wed., Feb. 7 — Foster High site council, 7 p.m. Thurs., Feb. 8 — Meet the Superintendent, admin. building, 6 p.m. — South Central Schools Advisory Council, admin. building, 7 p.m. Sat., Feb. 10 — Wrestling, regional toumament at Mountlake Terrace Mon., Feb. 12 — Lincoln's Birthday — Tukwila City Council comm. of the whole, city hall, 7 p.m. Tues., Feb. 13 — South Central School Board special mtg., Cascade View, 7 p.m. Wed., Feb. 14 — Valentine's Day — Showalter site council, library, 7 p.m. Thurs., Feb. 15 — Susan B. Anthony's Birthday — Cascade View PSO, 6:30 p.m. — Thomdyke PSO, 6:30 p.m., site council, 7 p.m. 1 Fri., Feb. 16 — No school (mid - winter vacation) — Wrestling, state class A tournament, Tacoma Dome Sat., Feb. 17 — Wrestling, state class A toum., Tacoma Dome — Rainier Symphony, Foster Per- forming Arts Center, 8 p.m. Mon., Feb. 19 — No school; President's Day; Chinese New Year Tues., Feb. 20 — Tukwila City Council regular mtg., city hall, 7 p.m. — Basketball, West Central district town., Curtis High, Tacoma Wed., Feb. 21 — Earty school release (secondary 11:30 a.m., elem. 12:45) / — Foster Community Club, Foster Public Library, 7 p.m. ✓ Thurs., Feb. 22 — Washington's Birthday — Duwamish Improvement Club, Peterson Hall, 7:30 p.m. Fri., Feb. 23 — Basketball, West Central district town., Curtis High, Tacoma Sat., Feb. 24 — Basketball, West Central district town., Curtis High, Tacoma Mon., Feb. 26 — Tukwila City Council comm. of the whole, city hall, 7 p.m. Tues., Feb. 27 -- South Central School Board regular mtg., 5:30 p.m. Wed., Feb. 28 — Basketball, state class A toumament, Tacoma Dome Thurs., Feb. 29 — Basketball, state class A tournament, Tacoma Dome Fri., Mar. 1 — Basketball, state class A tournament, Tacoma Dome Sat., Mar. 2 — Basketball, state class A tournament, Tacoma Dome Mon., Mar. 4 — Tukwila City Council regular mtg., city hall, 7 p.m. Wed., Mar. 6 — Foster High site council, 7 p.m. Thurs., Mar. 7 — South Central Equity Task Force, 5 p.m. — Foster Booster Club, Foster High staff room, 7 p.m. Mon., Mar. 11 — Tukwila City Council comm. of the whole, city hall, 7 p.m. Tues., Mar. 12 — South Central Sch. Bd. special mtg., Thomdyke, 7 p.m. Wed., Mar. 13 — Showalter site council, library, 7 p.m. Thurs., Mar .14 — Meet the Superintendent, admin. building, 6 p.m. — South Central Schools Advisory Council, admin. building, 7 p.m. Sun., Mar. 17 — St. Patrick's Day Mon., Mar. 18 — Tukwila City Council regular mtg., city hall, 7 p.m. Wed., Mar. 20 — First day of spring — Earty school release (secondary 11:30 a.m., elem. 12:45 p.m.) — Foster Community Club, Foster Public Library, 7 p.m. Thurs., Mar. 21 — Cascade View PSO, 6:30 p.m. — Thomdyke PSO, 6:30, site council, 7 p.m. — Duwamish Improvement Club, Peterson Hall, 7:30 p.m. Sun., Mar. 24 — Delta -White Center Masonic Lodge #172 (131st & 41st S. in Riverton) pancake breakfast, 8 a.m.-noon COMMENTS For Planning Commission Uwe have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: FEEL THAT wE A2C 601.16 To HAUG. A Furst I P.205LE,- w P/./2k1&1‘ Lo r 1- 1'n /&- 1= /_07^ Tl1 F <•r2c-C7. rHE LOT As ncss, /Lt S /-/OL/L /) 1 5 vrs�r3•L& r2O1-1 rHa C n p ,qD 1+ , r1-16- RviL or>\cC 5C -'r roL'Aa o$ THE. 1/461L� l wove -D L110E ro SE L. /A Sro.kri rii2 /%1 -iO'e 012 7 L'A TL "ii.i°1Zs. /.:r•/f5J- . STvCCo LOOIS (,1-ie/ P 1" -02 /-3 v L +ITT r /S, /1Cd- h $ MO/2._E" /2.,00V) /= O)Z L0iLA OrFi1 5 . Name: DAO1 o LIt/E12 I io &t' Address: ►32/2 3i /AYE SG ... 1 J 199t C. ATTACHMENT L Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER Ul3RARY: 3m-ob.4. o ()-Or,, 1), 1 ainiteirt*. 0 9J dam PL/7.O (13-u,LU-2) (1 • •• • • an_L4.,br, (6) I UiCe___v /0„Car ine)Ccu- • --r,o,u) .,13: di 1 (2//2< /9 r\A.)Y J/Driu VaI,O,c corLa-ei?.,,-) sizirE7Y gA//stcl(vC.) 0._&_,efi L() (U)/2, / *..e foLe. t/M__Q AIEED 01\I 4L 77-/E I II0E .0.07/7W WILL (4014 01\1 THE_ • cP()N-i-- OF- OD ,L...10u5 e yo(( P07- //V 1r)-1,/o1/.) RECEiVE 15 1°2' coNimut\1 Name: Sco-71-?)oze."--u? z)ar},/te Address: /Z/,23 9 4/..2i)d a v-e. s• . Public Information Meeting 2/15/94.. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments . on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: / A • --e• Lcer ' r— r-- • rw" ".*. ‘,r • ••• Ann I Name: Address: Public InfOrmation Meeting 2/15/94.. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I /we have the following comments • on proposed FOSTER UBRARY: c o` a)-26v- e 60e,k.-- e.,E-r,, a -S ef' sh w• Wi t- • 1,^^47 e ti. o- r-J- - is . & ca / .,.' .. r_ - .. Name: ,rr� Address:/ �� 7 r� oC-%7 4 P. 5� I-% � .... v.J. Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. ( • COMMENTS FOR PLANNING COMMISSION I /we have.•the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: 1. Materials used do not fit the Northwest landscape -- it lr_'oks like it should have been built in Georgia. 2. North facing windows in the Seattle area are fairly useless. Hi qh windows along the South side would let in more natural light. S. Roof areas should be peaked to increase the height of the exterior but not open in the interior as in cathedral ceilings. 4. There is too much concern about Foster High School. The architect doesn't live Here, the KCLS planning administrator doesn't live here. Residents are not going to think of the library as are extension of the school. 5. Landscape architects operate out of a completely different mode than real gardeners -- there should be more input frc'rn a real horticultural person. G. Current site plan is uninviting and unwelcoming -- building faces the wrong way. 7. There doesn't appear to be enough storage in the building. S. There should be more computers and typewriters. 9. Please see attached examples of possible changes in direction and looks for the new library. o22/4) 713- is7a RECEIVED MAR 0 21994 DEVELOPMENT • • 7 D- D n•,W4 Wu•t am( n w.lal. EV I$tfr 0DIT6lP1.1r 44.1•4.44446 1 ♦. r • r- -- • 1 444M7. r I 1 1;2— `• —•~ t. ) 4. 1 4 )i I- `..,. 'Wa}ft' ! • . • Taft 1 4111111 11 ausastinLwasessarim P N \1 • t-t- ba. 1441M10•41* L WY V44Wgl1 /V4l4 suu. 1••w• Res 1 ;t Pjf 7rova 9-0-ti 'I 14-1-4 + –6T �e,-C -T COMMENTS 'A E C E t V E) For Planning Commission MAR 0 7 1994 CO iV1MUNi 1 Y DEVELOPMENT 1 /we have the fcUowing comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: -7�e, • e ism i c /a ln2A.- -r.2tiv z' -7-t cd a -L e- t S _ t& .e7X, 716e, ' /j, Z ._ a/ J u - 4 Gl flY7'I.CJ 7.��a� €14-tA • G00771 a-cAZ:2.-c. 06, 4-6(-7 def"7". )ax.-e-t-1.1 fa/2 PY, . Name: a ./ % C " 742 r�rc9- r/vr.G=P a i & ,d' Address: Zr,Ws( /17K °/ Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission 1/we have the following comments, on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: ..1.. ...... ::..: 1( Z'f... 7l/ /7.7 7. ) /-,;---0, • A. 7 - ,..5 ::- ',---.4e-,./-7.. 7-1 • ., ./../7 .4e/-•-• .0 S'. "--- ' (-:-/.) 4.1. //1.- - - e%',7-. /.; 2/, /' /*/ ,I -I /*/4.------) 17.Z.'/-- , / : - . - - , 7° 7:-/)7',---; 7•••-1 •"-, / -7,-L'r r -5--/1.71/14/ 4 c-er 7e,/- '/- (7 / --(...:.'..../-7.s" c.-.5-.9 1-ti , ,•--1,1••" /-7,. . / / - . - ., ..e • c r . 4>'/v- 17/7 4,47 / .. :/-i c? / n t-, /) = i 17?--)..2) I- , . 4- 1-e.-' er.7 / / / _1,1- i ,f;' e.*) / /...1- , '77.--- ,,"; A ,-1 / e".: ./ ") i•-.• (-:•", „Nr. ..•••• . 74/1 .•••• / .4•///-:,./ r/T1 r..:".:: 5.-e -')•/...%," On' V le" 6, ,41 •-- „ / /t -,- .e.54., , ' /(')/(14 Cr I e..71/rt*::-; • t:-.? .4.-. 1 4.70", Gri z't 41/2 ••I i ,...‘ ..,1 74/.,, • ...1 e . J.,' :, ., :;lic-.(1 "A" 67/-e' ./ ...:2 -2 I 0 r• r<,„ • ., 4/ (/ -Z ,•,.. ,,,,...r.. ../:. 7.,• / 4 ' .• .,.(;4/ / ,e"--r r"2 't 1- /Gt / / . ./) ..• --, ...-. / ./...: ' -r-7 c'.../ ri.)./,‘: Tr'. 7 -11. e / / /.1 47./7' • 47/7 / /- 5-e74 ..Z. 3 • ^fr , ) ,,c, // 71 e-e2") I -/,4/ ,-7 I 27 /07 744; K A V' 71.0 „.2 , / / //7 Z / '7,6-rc7 V RECFiVED MAR 251994 Name: Address: "7" .41 DEVELOPMENT • , Public Information Meeting 2/15/94 COMMENTS For Planning Commission I/we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: RFCE1VED Name: a eUIVIMUI ITY DEVELOPMENT Address: Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. ' L COMMENTS For Planning Commission I /we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER LIBRARY: c ,oc 1c/ 171-- a, Ai %ours 74 Lief a f�-e 7 c,�- C" A-/ o 4 :r z, /)71 f-e C-0/77-4;'-'7‘ 444 ,SPQ �-r` 71- q /-i _q - o d' .e'i /,-)e r T4els, cvy• 61 ,;741 /270, /37 6, A/ sae 6Iw • 1497v/ r te/.{ 9� /6F i l `� 7 �7f:� ' i % li fi�'rG /la/ i25 /e1,02- 2-9 ,� -/� /G/ / , d/ -7�S G© (//or/� 570 ot r/ ,t ,1/ L-/ vi �/ G - /D G (� P, ,f 5 /9- ,/ " L. Name: MAR 251994 COMviMUNITY DEVbLC3NMENT Address: Public Information Meeting 2/15/94. COMMENTS For Planning Commission I /we have the following comments on the proposed FOSTER UBRARY: WSeci9 rt'f'D �jv -1-p l c`v1ce__ 114 e.A0-'U .e�. 1,0-1` II 6 7007. -- % / �bYt l/G�K '`-d rd %stir "1.11 i 2-1i 4 u. 4"- t ,A ce_'? . -1 f� �' -1�1 ` b o-{- x--14 e-.: -r w ka - g 170 c vf, ('0Ee,_ / 4 )- REC E... MAR 2 51994 CUNIMUNITY DEVC-LOPMFJNT Public Information Meeting 2/15/94 1 c- - c– A , .`� '�, / Vi1.%\ %-\ /\/7 \ / YY e k.......... / ,r • / n. - . ,_r,. _. ,.._... Viz--- --=.7 lira fV/ _ �_ c..-- � — -f _ " .-- t„,,,,....) M � � Mn0 M: 0,7) vi .tom. ew n) ` T I1� ;_r_,-, 1 f lt - ( n J CC,� ��6 1 1 Ez1i�' '7;11 i `t T 17= i _ + - CMS CU/ 1 1 ~ { t : t Ef?3 ] 3OUTL1 ELEVATION SruTH 144" 44 RCZE r \/ \ / / ` / \` / \ / \ / Xi WEST ELCVA710N rAt Kitlri 1 1 1 I 1 1 . t . FOSTER LIBRARY - 2/15/94 Public Info Meeting I• TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of A NCIIITTLTS CR SM.:, rear. Foster Library t4 ,Sr.r. Nw..in H, 1141 ARCHI1LC1S REED REIN\'At U arlo Erte.Ito.. I,,0. OtOtf.00 ®1^Sfc so.roe) TT.> SDA -3 -. - . ,_r,. _. ,.._... Viz--- --=.7 c..-- ~T • ��6 1 1 Ez1i�' [E- l 1 CiEl Ef?3 ] I �tii i -iiI f�1 — �,a f i --f �� — t� �: 1 WEST ELCVA710N rAt Kitlri 1 1 1 I 1 1 . t . FOSTER LIBRARY - 2/15/94 Public Info Meeting I• TIIE AMERICAN INSTITUTE Of A NCIIITTLTS CR SM.:, rear. Foster Library t4 ,Sr.r. Nw..in H, 1141 ARCHI1LC1S REED REIN\'At U arlo Erte.Ito.. I,,0. OtOtf.00 ®1^Sfc so.roe) TT.> SDA -3 ....,..;a _ - =....7:.7T='t..;::x wT.;iL:::l;w4T " P,i: =?�.,�'S -' :1t ^".�'i:7:::"rs f.'�.^`�.e�= tr;, �. �rs�tn: st: rs �:^ al- a: rer_- c�:, xn sn.i �o.+ nR�L+ � ..,•.nN.,.,...•.....,...,,.,... — 1— — 0— — 0— c- 1 EI1•TiW. AuiIU,uif LCt4ll1W 1114 3.4,1 1+n.( 11111111• 1 1 -1 1 9•RIWL I 14• I i - --• (.11nV.RT IV N I.a - -`1 • I r-•—_ i~ A 4 Y o 4 14•4•• • I . -1L1 lL1YL1C1. Kr' 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 J • 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 10 Ott -f-H -i-4 -A 4x --s-r -g- St- Foster Library - 2/15/94 Public Into Meeting 1 I I 1. 1 17 1L 11 11 THE WERN:IV INSTITUTE OF # r lKC1IITTJ:TS • 41...1ht O••1• roster Library (*Po ly L.M.y Sy.l... 7.•n.1••■•• 10. ISSJ ARCHITECTS REINVALD Site Plan "rnrllt 44•:e/3 SDA -1' . 1 . APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: Conditional Use Criteria (TMC 18.64.050) 1. The proposed use will not be materially detrimental to the pubic welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed use or in the district in which the subject property is located. "The proposed use directly replaces the existing Foster Library across 42nd Avenue and will significantly improve the corner property from its current state through the building and site developments." 2. The proposed use shall meet or exceed the performance standards that are required in the district it will occupy. "The proposed use will exceed the performance standards required in the district through building production values, landscaping and site amenities." 3. The proposed development shall be compatible generally with the surrounding land uses in terms of traffic and pedestrian circulation, building and site design. "The proposed development specifically considers the adjacent high school design and circulation patterns, the ease and safety of both pedestrian and vehicular access, and the appropriateness of use and landscaping along adjoining properties." 4. The proposed use shall be in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan. "The proposed use not only maintains the library function in the same area but also moves it to a more prominent public location to help continue South 144th Street as a civic boulevard." 5. All measures have been taken to minimize the possible adverse impacts which the proposed use may have on the area in which it is located. "The design of the building, landscaping, parking and storm water system for the proposed use has reduced all possible adverse impacts on the area in which it is located." ATTACHMENT J APPLICANT'S RESPONSE: Design Review Criteria (TMC 18.60.050) 1. Relationship of Structure to Site. - The site should be planned to accomplish a desirable transition with the streetscape and to provide for adequate landscaping and pedestrian movement. - Parking and service areas should be located, designed and screened to moderate the visual impact of large paved areas. - The height and scale of each building should be considered in relation to its site. The building has been located on the site to screen the parking and service area from the streets, allow pedestrian access directly to the building and landscape elements, and provide as urban edge and corner in response to the adjacent high school forecourt. the scale of the building has a mix of varying sized elements and materials to respond to both the adjacent high school and the surrounding houses." 2. Relationship of Structure & Site to Adjoining Area. - Harmony in texture, line and masses is encouraged. - Appropriate landscape transition to adjoining properties should be provided. - Public buildings and structures should be consistent with the established neighborhood character. - Compatibility of vehicular and pedestrian circulation patterns and loading facilities in terms of safety, efficiency and convenience should be encouraged. Compatibility of on -site vehicular circulation with street circulation should be encouraged. "The building is composed of 3 massing elements: the main library block, the staff service block, and the entry portico. All elements are unified by a continuous horizontal cornice and a variety of harmonious textures to provide interest and relationship to surrounding buildings. Landscaping buffers with fence is designed to screen the adjacent properties. Separation of pedestrian and vehicular circulation allows for direct access by pedestrian traffic while locating vehicle driveways at the maximum distance from street intersection for safety." 3. Landscape and Site Treatment. Where existing topographic patterns contribute to beauty and utility of a development, they should be recognized, preserved and enhanced. - Grades of walks, parking spaces, terraces and other paved areas should promote safety and provide an inviting and stable appearance. Landscape treatment should enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas and important axes, and provide shade. ATTACHMENT K - In locations where plants will be susceptible to injury by pedestrian or motor traffic, mitigating steps should be taken. - Where building sites limit planting, the placement of trees or shrubs in paved areas is encouraged. - Screening of service yards and other places which tend to be unsightly should be accomplished by the use of walls, fencing, planting or combinations of these. Screening should be effective in winter and summer. - In areas where general planting will not prosper, other materials such as fences, walls, and pavings of wood, brick, stone or gravel may be used. - Exterior lighting, when used, should enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and fixtures should be of a design and size compatible with the building and adjacent area. Lighting should be shielded, and restrained in design. Excessive brightness and brilliant colors should be avoided. "A. Existing site features retained and used in the landscape concept involve existing onsite trees which will be saved. These include a very mature American elm and an informal grouping of Red alders along the north property line which serve as an effective screen for the existing apartment building. Special measures will be required to retain the elm, including loss of perhaps an additional parking stall beyond that shown depending upon pending horticultural input. The alders can be retained with careful grading of the parking lot fill to return to existing grade in the shortest distance possible." "B. All walkways and steps will promote safe comfortable pedestrian access to all site uses with a sure - footed sandblasted concrete surface and landscape -scale riser /tread step ratios. The sidewalk crossings at driveway entrances are marked with scored concrete and a pattern of small "buttons" to warn motorists of possible pedestrian /bicycle traffic." "C. The entire landscape scheme takes as its first priority its compatibility with the architecture. Building facade features have been carefully acknowledged by shrub and tree massing. The distinctive feature of the southeast corner window is set -off with a foreground of sculptured earth and groundcover plants in- planted with Spring - flowering bulbs. The pedestrian and vehicular entrances from S 144th Street are emphasized by bosques of ornamental flowering trees. Visibility to the terracotta plaques of the east facade is maintained by careful placement of street trees and selection of shrub massing at this location. The sculpture pad at the north sidewalk is framed with an evergreen hedge containing a slot to allow passing motorists to catch a glimpse of the sculpture and perhaps the neon ceiling lighting feature within the building. The distinctive geometry of the porch is projected into the landscape by the architecture of the entry hardscape, including the concrete scoring pattern. Existing stately poplars immediately to the east inspired a careful placement of poplars in the bioswale area to further project the influence of the building geometry, to act as a backdrop and foil to direct the eye to the building and to provide a screen to /from the residential property to the west without being an imposing barrier." "D. Planting areas impacted by pedestrian traffic are protected by raised seat walls and low curbs at the entrance walks." "E. Planting at the west facade was removed at the City's request to provide for pedestrian traffic." Shrub plantings at the northwest corner should adequately screen limited service and utility elements at this location. "F. "G. N /A." "H. Exterior lighting will consist of shielded parking lot fixtures or standards. Canopy lighting will be designed for pedestrian routes (minimal building lighting is envisioned)." 4. Building Design. - Architectural style is not restricted, evaluation of a project should be based on quality of design and relationship to surroundings. - Buildings should be to appropriate scale and be in harmony with permanent neighboring developments. - Building components, such as windows, doors, eaves, and parapets, should have good proportions and relationship to one another. Building components and ancillary parts shall be consistent with anticipated life of the structure. - Colors should be harmonious, with bright or brilliant colors used only for accent. - Mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings should be screened from view. - Exterior lighting should be part of the architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with building design. - Monotony of design in single or multiple building projects should be avoided. Variety of detail, form and siting should be used to provide visual interest. "This design establishes an appropriate civic presence for the library through strength and dignity of form. The civic aspect of this building is further established by three traditional elements: 1) The base: a low concrete wall which provides the anchor, 2) middle: brick and acrylic finish stucco with cast stone art medallions, 3) The top: an acrylic finish stucco cornice with distinctive stepping over windows and the portico. The combination of the colors will be warm and friendly. The . well lit portico will be generous and inviting. The window pattern is derived from interior function, with focal points responding to the southeast street corner and the northern art place. Mechanical equipment will be screened by cornice. Exterior lighting will be downlighting with fixtures that compliment the architecture." 5. Miscellaneous Structures & Street Furniture - Miscellaneous structures and street furniture should be designed to be part of the architectural concept of design and landscape. Materials should be compatible with buildings, scale should be appropriate, colors should be in harmony with buildings and surroundings, and proportions should be to scale. - Lighting in connection with miscellaneous structures and street furniture should meet the guidelines applicable to site, landscape and buildings. "The major furniture element, the sitting wall at the south forecourt, will also provide an opportunity for public art. This could occur as 3 dimensional busts on the wall of pioneers, authors or others as chosen by the City of Tukwila. This is an opportunity to tell a story through art as a story might he told through art medallions on the building." _...... . �._.......... a. �. �. w�..., �m« norv.....,.. �..,.. �... w„ �..,.........,..,... w�....»,... �wrr...+ ��nvr✓, rrs .�ml,.rr.�cr�uN�nrsxmtt�eevA.:; �1�i�r,�z2s.uF^;2�3:.�!.Y.�: City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development City of Tukwila CORRECTED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Rick Beeler, Director Notice is hereby given that the City of Tukwila Planning Commission will be holding a work session at 6:00 p.m. and a public meeting at 8:00 p.m. on Aug. 25, 1994 located at 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to discuss the following: I. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION - 6:00 P.M. The Planning Commission will be holding a work session to discuss the Annexation, Transportation Corridors, and Tukwila South elements of the Draft Comprehensive Plan. II. BOARD OF ARCIi1TBCFURAL REVIEW PUBLIC MEETING - 8:00 p.m. CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L93 -0088: Foster Library Design Review Architects Reed Reinvald, for King County Library Services The Board will review applicant's design revisions that implement Conditions of Approval from the June 23rd hearing. 4060 S. 144th Street (at 42nd Ave. S.) Persons wishing to comment on the above cases may do so by written statement or by appearing at the public meeting. Information on the above cases may be obtained at the Tukwila Planning Division. The City encourages you to notify your neighbors and other persons you believe would be affected by the above items. Published: Seattle Times August 24, 1994 Distribution: Mayor, City Clerk, Property Owners /Applicants, Adjacent Property Owners, File. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 4313665 /0ML Page 8 FOSTER COMMUNITY NEWS What's new in the Foster Public Library? Do you know what is going on with the new Foster Library? The citizens of Tukwila are anxious for the building to go up. So, what has been the delay? One of the most frequently asked questions is, "Why haven't they started building the new Foster Library? So far all that we have is a sign!" The process began to take shape when citizens met several times with King County Library representatives to share their ideas and suggestions about what they wanted in a library. This included looks, content and position on the site. The design became very important to these citizens, and this was reflected by the Tukwila Planning Commission. King County Library purchased the lot at the northwest corner of 144th and 42nd. This large lot will accommodate a building of 5,250 square feet, with 34 parking stalls. With this location the library will have much foot traffic so the citizens wanted an inviting building where all would be welcome. The site has many advantages, but there were issues to be considered. Traffic is heavy her with the Foster High School just across the street. Also, this is a single - family residential area, so being a good neighbor is important. Too much light in neighbors' windows would be an armoyance - yet staff and patrons need light for safety. The parking area should be a safe environment for ai 1.. The Tukwila Planning Department took all these concerns into consideration and aske( King County Library to make some changes to the original submitted plans. King County rework( d the plans and on June 23, 1994, the new improved plans were submitted to the Tukwila Pla zning Commission where they were passed. Several minor revisions were asked for. These revisioi s will cause no additional delay. This process was to the citizens' advantage and reflects Tukwila's vi: ion of a public building. Many citizens' comments seem to support this. • The building will be inviting outside as well as inside. A new meeting room will accommodate up to 70 and will be a welcome addition to the Tukwila area. The collection will be expanded and a new feature will be the English as a Second Language collection which will aid our new reside its to this country. The library will continue to serve all the students of the South Central School Di strict. Most of all, the library will expand its popular collection to meet the reading needs of the come unity in general. Computers, faxes, and Internet will all be available to help library patrons enter th : new information age of the 21st Century. • With all these things in mind, we will await ground breaking ceremony ,which shoul( take place sometime in the Spring of 1995. — Mac Para mayor informacibn sobre su club en espaffol, 'lame por telefono 433 -8539. FOSTE!! CDMMUNITYCIUI ,ffAeEasxn MAI NAME (Include all members of your household) ,• STREET ADDRESS ZIP PHONE NUMBER SPECIAL!! CHARTER MEMBERSHIP DUES IN 1994!! One year for only $5! DPAID Paid memberships provide: newsletter, one vote for each household member, and more! Associate memberships with modified benefits are available for households outside the designated neighborhoods and for business owners/managers. Below, please list any issues or events you'd like to participate in: Your dues and membership form can be turned in at the next meeting or mailed to the club c/o 4251 S. 139th St. If you have any questions or wish to see the organization's by -laws, previous meeting minutes; etc.; please contact Nancy Lamb, Foster Community Club secretary, at 243 -3716. INSPECTION RECORD Retain a copy with permit CITY OF TUKWILA BUILDING DIVISION 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA 98188 595 Q ?3 PER IT NO. (206) 431 -3670 Project: . /e.....? L �J ize Type of Inspectan Address: 17e,61 cc9 L Ste,/ Date called: Special Instructions: Date Wanted: ' I 9'16 av Requester. Phone Na: proved per applicable codes. ❑ Corrections required prior to approval. COMMENTS: StG I.S _ CI'' ZA-c): -- l,J rE ao 10' -D': (1-- is A ci b° mow- P .At.). f / Dade: ❑ $30.00 REINSPECTIONIEE REQUIRED. Prior to reinspection, fee must be paid at 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100. Call to schedule reinspection. Receipt No.: Date: 1,0/06/95 FRI 20:03 FAX Post -it' Fax Note 7671 TC /aletnrifkiaZ 206 572 1445 Phone # fir j►a9 es Co. //w • Phone # ARCHITECTS ItRJW EQ. x1001 Fay iF flit. «wrl -I 1ihibJI1E,I ..r.�..� 4 rthlef+ 100 -�T�r. I►� -'�r• MULCH ONLY AROUND SHRUBS - NO GROUNDCOVER REQUIRED ; MULCH ONL'Y•ABOUND SHRUBS- • NO GROUNDCOVER.REQUIRED 25 - .LAVENDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA 25 - LAVENDyLA ANGUSTIFOLIA. EQ oc-c + a 19N5 1 e .VEMLOPNIENT • 1441 6:1-. 315 ' 12 I 0 wattsa!sma*.% F72,==1-41, " 1 •••••••"." I S" IL " " 2" / • KING COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM Foster Library •-• 6Lerr t't-71-4-4 I t • 1 "' r* }‘A** I -It WWII. ma ow wores nova 4.1 sir.. am. gehwe (E. G-1¢8,441-frEg_i5iPkt,444-11113:14 14E1J fr LIP .4,1M1:. (V- 411`1- Sri 414.12M • • • s. 1 4-1-1-1 5T. 1 17 1 n •ItiorlIO ON NO. 10000 CILAAMINV • .3" +-4-17 A . r Rc....,e-T-(...)re I t.rr: me-5-re 1 e:17-L • c-ty 11 " " k4 Cc+-.&Pt.•,Te tz- GCrr" 1 kr/ I t--A• I' (r-z -ret, ETE: . -,r3rA ck_3/ 2-i R,,a;-, • ".,. "..,1a0aiii40§VaIrtt • • • . RECEIVED CRY OF TUKWILA NOV 2 91995 PERMIT CENTER SCALE: 1N6 A44.11C1... DATE: 111.7:1:1.7; PPROVED DT: DRAWN DY REVISED 14111•71-1 ; I t-'4■ DRAWING RUMMER /.4 G1511 I ' • • • FOSTER LIBRARY Revised Entry RECEIVE JUN 2 31994 , r DEVELOPMENT e 0 CI -I WAN X 3ZI Q33Z1 HOZiv* Inv," : 6 0 156 'C '9 0 0 1,) (41fuji"1*-% 0 x PI ruvrt-il sirri4 oaf MeV. pap 6g114VAIV ie •.si ipag 101614 It C O N V E R S A T I O N R E C O R D FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: March 2, 1994 TYPE: Phone WITH: David Boe Confirmed meeting this Friday 3/4/94 with architects & KCLS. Reviewed with David Boe some items in my revisions letter (2/14/94). Boe had comments similar to those expressed by Doug Blair (2/25/94). Boe believes many of the revisions listed in letter are unreasonable. They had put a lot of thought into certain design features, and my letter implied that they hadn't. I explained that the drawings were more conceptual, and that much of Boe's rationale was not conveyed there. I've been very impressed in the past with Boe & Wong's ability to explain design rationale, so I know they think about these things; however, these drawings don't show that. I believe that many of the required revisions are ones which the architect /L.A. should have addressed already, or would normally have to address as design was further refined. Therefore, I didn't think that the items in my letter would be surprises. Boe understands the need for refinement, but frustrated that we're asking for more detail in drawings at this time, when BAR may change everything. Also, he can't provide some things, like lighting plan, because they don't know who lighting engineer is going to be. I understand his concern - -it's a common concern of developers and applicants who have to prepare a proposal without knowing what the ultimate decision -maker will decide - -but this is the nature of the design review process as it exists now. The alternative is to keep coming back for repeated denials by BAR until they get it right. The level of detail we're asking for should not have been a surprise. BAR guidelines in application which he filled out talk about showing lighting standards, screening techniques, paving materials, and other details. Why would he think that the drawings wouldn't need to show how these criteria are addressed? Boe thinks that for more design development we may have to postpone hearing 1 month or 2 months. I agreed that's not desirable. I am giving him as much time as I can - -to the great detriment of our staff work schedule - -to make revisions. For some minor issues where we clearly agree on concept, we can perhaps agree to address as conditions of BAR approval & work out details later. Some revisions are matter - of- course which would have been done anyway. Most revisions in letter are not major revisions, but refinements. In any event, if it is a choice between a quality building which the community can live with, or meeting a deadling for the March 24 hearing, I would postpone the hearing. Boe also feels many issues raised in my letter are "schizophrenic," in that the project challenges are schizophrenic - -he must respond to behemoth high school, old residences, ugly apartment buildings, and the need for a civic, small -scale library. It is very difficult to respond to everything. He also objects to criticism of the portico alignment and subtlety of curve. These very intentional; he's trying to be subtle, and we're asking for more crude rendition. I agreed that context is difficult. No one expects him to emulate the high school or others. However, the library needs to respond to some context, and the context he's chosen to respond to is not clear. It would be helpful to hear more of his rationale at upcoming meeting. I suggested that staff & architect's intent may be very similar, but we may not see eye -to -eye on implementation. On some items, it may be OK to agree to disagree, and let BAR decide. We can discuss further at meeting. Reviewed SEPA items. Boe will sign checklist at Friday's meeting. Removing all references to future expansion. All other items done. FILE: FROM: DATE: TYPE: WITH: C O N V E R S A T I O N FOSTER LIBRARY Ann Siegenthal February 24, 19'4 Phone Doug Blair R E C O R D Doug Blair reviewed copy of revisions letter sent to Boe (2/14/94). Had a very negative response to it, for several reasons: Blair felt that these issues should have been raised earlier in process. Architect has spent a lot of time on design and in several meetings; Blair assumed that design was basically acceptable. Feels he has been stabbed in the back, as he did not anticipate this. Blair feels very strongly that we should have told him we wanted a "brick" building. I clarified that staff has, at every meeting we've had, stated concerns about design details /refinement, outdoor spaces, need for use of quality materials, etc. When we asked about materials, architect hadn't even addressed materials yet. Many of the required revisions are ones which the architect /L.A. should have addressed already, or would normally have to address as design refined. These are not surprises. Regarding "brick:" I explained that library need not be "brick," but must be of a quality material, such as unit masonry, or unit masonry with some other facing material. We are still not convinced that "simulated stone" and dryvit are quality materials. There is a range of materials available which are better quality; his architect has some options and he needs to work with the architect on this. Blair believes we are asking for too much detail at this time; BAR may change, and the architect will have to make further revisions. Also, this is too much to ask for at llth hour; it may jeopardize project schedule. I explained that this is the typical level of detail requested at this stage. We encouraged them to get drawings in asap so that we could respond with specific comments. Obviously, we can't do very specific review until we receive an application. They submitted drawings which were mostly conceptual, not well - developed; we responded within a reasonable amount of time with comments typical for drawings at this stage of development. The concern about future BAR changes is common in the design review process. Thats why staff tries to work with them to resolve as many issues as possible prior to BAR - -we have a sense of what BAR will expect. Gave him some examples of how BAR has rejected proposals due to lack of specific details. To give architect time to respond, I will really crunch up our timeline on the staff's side. It will be difficult for us to prepare our report and BAR packets on time, but I will give architect until 3/10/94 to submit revisions. Blair agreed. Reviewed SEPA items. Blair doesn't have any long as the requirement for Design Review specific design responses. I clarified that Blair meeting with KCLS staff & architect response to my letter. He will call me asap meeting with me. cc: File objections to these, as doesn't lock him in to it doesn't. on 2/25; to formulate after that to schedule a C O N V E R S A T I O N RECORD FILE: FOSTER LIBRARY FROM: Ann Siegenthaler, DCD DATE: March 4, 1994 TYPE: Meeting WITH: David Boe, Steve Wong (arch); Doug Blair (Architectural Projects Coordinator), Kay Johnson (Deputy Librarian for Facilities Development) (KCLS); Jack Pace, Ann Siegenthaler Purpose of meeting to review items in Ann's letter of revisions dated 2/14/94. Boe handed out a letter with his response item -by -item. I haven't seen this letter previously; we reviewed each item. SEE LETTER ATTACHED. SEPA: All agreed on SEPA issues. Design - related conditions addressed in design review section of both letters. Site Plan: 1. Boe presented revised site plan which deals with most issues in my letter. Forecourt revised to open -up forecourt. They don't want it to be too large or it out of scale with entry & lobby. Re- design appears OK in concept. 2. Loading & service area: Loading all done off - hours, so no conflict. Moving trash to side will draw attention to it; instead, they will keep it in front of staff door but design it as integral part of architecture, defining edge of "staff space" vs public space. Items 3 -6 done. 7. Parking: Blair handed out a list of parking requirements for other libraries. Foster Library proposal will include all parking which previously denoted as "future," i.e. they will build all parking now. Blair will provide additional info later to fill in some blanks on his handout. We can include Blair's handout in BAR packet. Other parking issues resolved. Building design: 8. Boe provided extensive background on the rationale behind their choice of neo- classical idiom. All agreed that context here is very difficult to work with; that no one wants .a library that emulates the high school or unattractive residential structures nearby. Looking for 1) appropriate scale and detailing; and 2) appropriate materials. Agreed that this can be accomplished with neo- classical building elements (e.g. 1920's neo -class wealthy residences), but architects need to really articulate their rationale in drawings and to BAR. 9. Materials: Most of meeting spent discussing materials. Building does not have to be all "brick;" it can use some dryvit. However, it is the way materials are combined and how used in details that is important. This overall quality is the concern, and there is a range that this can fall into. As proposed, library is at low end of quality continuum. Boe feels that to improve quality of materials, we will lose quality in detailing (budget constraints now wont allow both). This is not acceptable. We recognize there will be some tradeoffs, but they need to find a better solution. Once solution arrived at, they need to clearly demonstrate how their choices provide quality (i.e. it may not be marble, but it incorporates good materials and is very well detailed). Level of quality staff looking for must be articulated in drawings & materials board for BAR. Continued... Ka of ca ad th ac suggested that a solution might be to go ahead with long term plans building a larger library, rather than this 5200 sf (larger facility provide economy of scale where quality issues can be more easily ressed). This not consistent with interlocal agreement, but we ught community might be receptive to idea -- especially if we can ieve higher quality. Kay will discuss with Bill Ptacek. No additional items were covered; we ran out of time. Re =ched consensus on goals. We will work together toward quality building while recognizing that budget is not unlimited. Boe un•erstands what quality level we expect, but doesnt feel he can ac ieve it within current budget. He will need more direction from KCB S. Kay reiterated that KCLS wants to work with the community, wants to be up front, and leave community with a building they can feel good abut. They will meet with Library Board to get direction. Al agreed that much more work needs to be done; we will postpone March 24, 1994 hearing date to allow architect time to work out issues. J. k & Ann briefed Rick. L J 0.161 S 6 fie . /4ZND sT) $ 4/ V) • w ,� oe.is ,►lor 1_ V wad ® '� 47.t7.44, w Rte.14 /GD 16 e4 H °IS Ot‘ ntr 4,0i/si3') ' e4 e6 /40 /40 6 0 1)/ D 0 Gr. ov •, 14 13 ,j`� ct ' M G N N 3 1 diP 0 264 WEST 2( 4 159 259 4 eo 0 otiP 0 12 o‘ev n • 001'4 000 ✓► Qo �sP 0 y e N eO 11 104, o op° I; o` 10 . e(. S. 142ND ST. A 4 (3 uri! eT) 8711170J1m -e M 5 /40 2S 25 N 87-35-33W • 33.5 Of 204 204 io 41 158745 -651 W VI ZI 0 6 e4 7 9 1 . t • 0 • • -0• hi 3 • • • N fri 127 e 00 N n K N 86 -33 -o3 w 04.63 26/.03 384- 33 -03E (d.LN.O, s• 430. 0I P � 1 C)I [N.W oFS.4303 v 1 4 105. 0 • 7ti•WWitR Cit�y L�IM.�• aso. N 11-53-33 W h see /4s` =3E 184.27 9 10 t ,Il4 IIN 11 /1 ;.34 _ 79.77 12 — /11.5 . 2/! • So ': so le /05 as 13• ere /01 4 5e 3 M "See 0'3 3 444 GV� /A5 -1326.22144TH so " 68.6 % 20.1 "9b.3 15 S fa 4 0 N 16 t 10 84 ST. 4 ,� I1r7os.14: $ 6 4 0 3 w 121 !L4 Ar'y r� h 35 I: CC V ao 142D 4 0 • • • t 300' TYI? _ /87.5 t S. 144TH''`'-" ST. R • C/0'ir:r. 1140 s_1947 326.22 ` :ael��� 144TH T, 75012 •: 121. '1.• 18 to " 48.5 a os 0 it 15 .3 27 16 Yo pig W'LI try tiw+ r /� hir evhz, Per tmi•7/, 1 I 4es3re53s, • 1Le.94 *4 i /OZ1f 5. orelo 39 ro 11,1.60 11 i ice_, $�55 � ss•ta 40 5. 14 2 IIho' -s4" w •,7D /.I 7 a s ' :8 I) 33 09 5d 1 ibitt �0 Zy �b',SS 0 /.� 3t I), ,6° - 30 sSe !t ° 'eOa I30.” e.0% 103 300'10. d 4.4 4 b 1 -I Tvevhi.1,- ig 'AA Ira 5. e,e ,s4r o,:r — G re.00: N /cwo .i AVF h 41.4. 18 • ILA. 1 ror•.,. >,,�.. LOT A .r." a 132.94 111.0 _/ t ss/.40 0 's ;i•+slesii H 'N to 441?- '94 s 190 !•P6 0 0 •n 144TH (sun. to- a3 -4 -4s) 31. 19, 190 o, 4 M • Z3- 4.-44) • ''I• 375 4 1 T. N 6? -4P4 1i6 W A M DUNS DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED: KEYNOTES: THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS REVISIONS: PROJECT TITLE: ' Foster 375 T' �1 N 67-49, 126W A M OVNC /24208 ro IZ6.4 THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS DRAWN: CHECKED: APPROVED: KEYNOTES: REVISIONS: PROJECT TITLE: • ..Foster I ASSESSOR'S MAP A41741-171.4 w � is t ��. gloo 0339 ta, 0961. 14,1 M.« Lel w7-52-14e rie.51 ANS'J'S1 S W � C 146TH 1112 .4i0 12 13 £4f 5 16 r. 1St" 10 • Ater4„.17w 4.7...g mt... o• iv. • t tqlt L., 7- lor"2" - • I 1 ; 4 1 I n tt II t • 0 k 0°13% OA 0 10 ey. 016- 16,00 59° 1 811.8711 61,99 0165 or - Lh. I ■111 It 1.000/ • 1/#.5• f 4 20 lt 4 7 • • draws 1 ;lot 21 / cick. If` u o 712- SO AY g oflo g p 151 0 •qi sal-SS-20e 126.14 AWN-09W MST, 40:40.16sF1 da..4111 TUK. L92-00 IA On° "LOT 4 3 rid o 5 'frt okk 4.449 atet.fis -9304210451 LOT 1 if t' ape 7.% ar ele 1- • — • A410 At1 irs 0140 Iu I■ • • 4 kk. LOT oil 30 qc • • 04 • •,0 •••"'" %I . J•• • 79 31S I LOT bo ei 911 Jr.:1,4 f45 001A 3•4:/*;% S. 1 4 6 TN ST. • 1lb tit hill 0 kft A loir - 7 1 1 or, 8 9/ % $ /00 9 Me • s I >■ i . . 1 . IN r vol It • A V ...ftal ........_ _..._._ I I — -- •1 10 1 12 13 14 • AIM 110— 0 001 2 a- . as, A:t IC 05t3 ec. 43. it40.114 Aid • 0 ipetj •40• • e 04" 6 o I/00 1 K 0315" «). yo/ eye 3 41. I p /4 LI ,,o ati P‘w 11 ST. 201 7 70 13 9/ AP Pt °"" lz CS AI /00 9 14 las 040' Mb 005 k sa op, "I ■ 11 tit •Im • a112- otiP 04471, 0 sf 6 20 05414 1 15 1993 NITv OEVEL -r 1 ARCHITECTS REED REINVALD CONSULTANT: SHEET TITLE: AsseSsoe. 'SCALE: PROJECT NO: • ;:ff; 93021:00 DATE: SHEET NO: NO. OF 4riE 0 ,t 2 Oa .11 211'5 0 oye3 • ,4..;:., 1 20 o59.. V obo M /84.4- IWO N 0.,q Ae, 1 J 1 11 00 OG tu. L.1.4 0 99 -9- 6U► 1993 1 � COPv`sMI..,JN1T Y DEVEL f.DPM NT .1 f 15 ARCHITECTS REED RE1NVALD CONSULTANT: SHEET TITLE: Assessor's Map SCALE: 100' PROJECT NO: 93021.00 DATE: SHEET NO: NO. OF SHE ISTfl4G Them- TQ`ReMAIN ' •�� sAVrt $ P116tEct /%l • MULTI FAMILY HOUSING .x ,h7 -) 1. --.''— 7 . ;)I :/ . LAAWN. ; . .) ' + EXISTING TREE - TO REMAIN C 'SAVE & PROTECT -X-- --X- -- • MULCH ONLY UNDERNEATH HEDGE: — — EXISTING TREES - TO REMAIN SAVE & PPOYECT . • r -9 1 1 • LAWN MULCH ONLY Al NO GROUNDCO MULCH ONL' NO GROUNC MULTI FAMILY HOUSING lEMAIN / 7/ HED/ MULCH ONLY AROUND SHRUBS - NO GROUNDCOVER REQUIRED MULCH ONLY AROUND SHRUBS - NO GROUNDCOVER REQUIRED n E L• PANT .'SCHEQU� 9 - • :.O 4. I II% I. I, ► i ,t ;TREES: • RUBS: • tau 0 0 e • wood 'Raywoal' / Ray Mottle an AustiBtddc•PRM Pepulust Canadentle Sta nd CwoNna Poplar • Pynis calleryaiia'Capitd' / Flowering Pear. Conius stobnitera / Red-twig Dogwood Nex crenata!Conlpacta' i Japanese Hilly Lavendula Engfieh Lavender ' •• Nandirtia'domestica'Harbour Dwarf / No common name • Rhododendron 'Janet Blair /- • No common name • • Rhododendron 'Scadet'Wonder' / No common name Rhododendron 'Unique' / No common name • 0 Taxus baccata 'Erecta' / Irish Yew Temstroemia gymnanthera / No common name GROUNDCOVERS: UMW 1Utilillig • Rubus calycinoides Evergreen Bramble • Comas canadensis / Bunc hberry • Lithodora diffusa / L' l hodora • Lawn Prom . B&B; $u1 head, br nched•at tf matched, well- branched MB; fu* 'branched b : • ground, rror'ied . ' BBBr head, branched at tr, • .'. • matched, wet- branched , • :2" cal. B&B; full head, branched at 6', matched, well- branched • es ht. 24 " -30" ht. & spread 18 " -24" ht. & spread Coat 1 gal. 30 " -36" ht. & spread 1 gala 21"-244 td. & spread 24 " -30' ht. & spread 30" -36" ht. & spread 4 "pots 4" pots 4 pots Seeded B&B or container; full B&B or cOr, taint ; lull, well- branched,* dense form Ft; dense form , B&B or container; 34 canes' min:; hardened growth, well - branched,.bushy form ' B&B; fult,.well- branched, dense form B&B or container; fuU, Well-branched, dense form he B&B; full, well- branched, dense form Full to ground • Full, well- branched, dence form 24" on center, triangular spacings ••18"ori .center, 15" on'center, .. - • trfangulair spacing :..See' spec fications • 24 " -30" ht. & spread 16" -24" 'td & spread 30" -36" ht. & spread 1 gal, .. . 21"-24" ht. • & spread 24 " -30" ht. & spread 30" -36' ht. & spread 4 "pots 4" pots 4" pots Seeded .r B&8; Putt he.d, branched at 6 , mMChed, well- branched 8ia; i+ OrinCiwd t+o • ground, no ehdated 8i9;; iui head; brancti.d matched, wet- branched B&B; tuff head, branched at 6', matched,. well= branched B&B or contak er; full 838 or otaftainer full, Well- t ranched ;dense form • , ui; dense Omni, •,B&B or container; 3.4 canes • min:; hardened growth, well- branched;. bushy form : • B &B; full, well- branded, • • :dense form- B &B-or container; U, . Y r, Well-branched, dense form , B&B; full, well- brandied, dense form FuN to ground ' Full, well - branched, dence form 24" on center, . • triangular spacing •, lrori Center, trlengulat spacing 15 "on center, . • triangular spacing See. spedlications Rsoirmso ,:�.:�:.» ......... APPROVED : NAB KEYNOTES : REVISIONS: A 23 MARCH 1995 PROJECT TITLE: KING COUNTY LIBRARY. SYSTE FOSTER LIBRAR TUKWItA. 45" = TYPICAL EXISTING TREES -.TO REMAIN SAVES PROTECT rMa I BASE BID: LAWN !ALTERNATE: EV `SE 41trxtviammalmitvivoitaw17. 45istrisys, titMettVer=4,.#4;lciM 5 'ir.P',Y.I.r4.1*.r‘ i■j .MULCH ONLY. NO GROUNDCOVE .• .40111.4111i. oniciTor fir i OUND SHRUBS-. R REQUIRED - LAVENDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA - LAVENDULA ANGUSTIFOLIA LA a S N •• I BASE BID: LAWN I ALTERNATE: EV (SE NM MI IIIIII IN NM IN MN III MI MN MEL =I III RGREEN r.v)tw, AMBLE D. 1111.111111 NM NM MO IINI Off INN MI VII lilt NINA te ( _.,4,7:,,c,,,,.7/ er, re eir•,im rt-V-L- ‘ '.".`., t---:' 4:4C( ) 7 '7(1.4-de-4 r .t 7.7 • �vmu7x „ras:.rraa3.u:.rw�r�y+w,vc,. isZwnK+ x7! �uw*.. o, �,.. .....�..,....•...+,.,.., Mismarinris-1, *Pow fir,- r,inee!c 1'4111W al. aVI ACM Watt p) t x 2” x 8' ADE,%uR6 -ZRro►> f ans., E-0ALLy tUrC L ( ' ArSofftePOSO. _1.1111ZP4 OWN *MR "aCeer fW MJ016 A'ACtavlat ,11oC14Sb". 2'D ReoaeV77ts, sk-nve • Typical Deciduous 'Free Planting /Staking Detail N.T.S. ete.lGrG. tia&N 2" + 2r- KJl..H ISLE • «�L 2 .- �4G{� PILL , MIN6 Typical Shrub Planting Detail N.T.S. r • 0 MIX NATIVE SOIL •%itii*met fir & 4771atI1� /Nem& Typical Coniferous 'lie Planting /Staking Deb N.T.S. m p 0 p 0 cD ?I- amt. cr r'to++f'&. osvP -.!= err ' Nom. Triangular Spacing DE N.T.S. NPeecep 5 y{wf �1??.tb...rrt1r �25;'tKa�"tzt(L+'.�Li'a aL".'r,:�;.1•:�..�.,*.rxi�: 6� 2 "x 2" psweRe 7 1TE0 ;,RNE c'tA! • t& &mow vr*Au.,) . dtwt4►y sweet*. eat =t MI. /deo AV • rLANT11414 MIX .NATIVES SOIL v AMINO TIE; • Typical Coniferous wee Planting /Staking Detail N.T.S. ail 'triangular Spacing Detail N.T.S. • STATE .OF E. "• WASHINGTON:,;',:. • REGISTERED' . • DSCAPE• CHITECTI A NEED REIINVAI CONSULTANT; JONGEJAN •GERRARD••McNEAL Inc gxxated P.S. Lurie apt Mth+erawc - n)Dkd Ave. 14 C. Urban Design. . Bel;rwe.14S seam CITY OF TUKWILA APPROVED APR 1 2 1995 AS NOTED BUILDING DIVISION 0 20' 40' RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA APR 0 61995 PERMIT CENTER Iii TLS—" PLANTING PLAN • SCALE: r = 20' -0` 15 NOVEMBER, .1.994 ENO' 93021.00. .. • c — i t 1 i 1 3 . 1 1 t ' ? , , .1 ? I i t 1 ::',-:.- .1, t ..,. • 1, 1 I , t, t i 3 t t 1 ; 1; } 3 ; 1 , I t 3 1 t t 1, ■ . , t I i t 1 , 3 i ; 1 t , 1 ; 3 1 3 i ; t 1 i. •`; .' —••••••,-' .:•••":•-",-1"'"-"'" :''''''''''''''''''''.. . i . . . 1 i • .• 1 • - 1 . • , . 1 ■ 1 i I . ! ! ! 1 t ! % 1 i 1 + . i J . i 1 1 i i 1 1 ' 1 1. ...rat.. , . ,........i.-....,,,a-ef, t 1 1 3 1 • ! 3 ; i 3 1 i i I f 1 . r , i 3 1 i I ; I • , i ' I 3 1 I ; ; 1 , ; • 1 A I ! ; i 1 i i 1 I I I 1 i 1 ? 1 ! ti 7 • ; i . ••1 . ■ • A A . t . ! . i A . ! . i 1 t f ! ! 1 ? A i t , I I t. i 1 ‘ 1 1 ; 1 •• ; i 1 ! i 1 c, • 1 i ) i 1 i .. i 1 i 1 k i 1 j i P 1. • !,•,. ± 1 i ± ! ! I i ; 1 7 i I i ! 1 i 1 ; li 7 ; 1 I )1 ! 1 I i 1 ; t I i ,t . • 1.- 1 • • ( 7 l• ) : • .I 1 7; 1 P. i • ' . 1 1 , 1 c • 7 • 1 , 7 , 1 ± ± . ; • I . 1 7 ; ! I 1 I 1 ; g I 1 1, 1 .±1 1 1 .1••• • :1 • • • , .,, • . • .. • • ■.).. 11 1 1 1 7 1 1 7 i 1 ± 1 , 7 1 i 1 I i 7 , ± ± i A t I 1 i ± g 1 1 1 7 I 1 1 1 I 1 i 7 . I i 1 ± t 1 7 i t i 1 I i k k 9 i I 1 7 i i I 7 filatitielli,~4MterMarigittaite • . ..... ,.... •., . ....M. .....• ...*-.....1 • ...................-•■•• . . , t . . . .. : . 1 • . . .. 1 . . . . . , ■ . . . . . • . . . . . 1. : ! 1 " I i I 1 3 5 5 ii i ■ 5 t 1 i 5 1 II i i ; 1 i 7' — • !„. .... • 1 ; I ) , : ! ! , , , 1 ; 1 1 1 1 7.' 1 1 1 1 4 0 { 1 1 1 7 1 1 I 7 I i I 1 1 I ' I : l 1 7 . ,, -.. - . ..,.........•• •..... . - - . ... .... - ...-...-...• . .”. • . • .... .. 4 --• ---............. 7 t ; i ; 1 ; 7 ti I. 1 i 1 i I 7 1 1 1 . 1 1 i i i t i •1 .. 5 i I 1 ? r t I ; 5 . . 5 i . it t 5 i , I i • ; . t • i 1, • , „ . k i i ' ' • , ,, • 4.. .. .S • • • - • ) • ! r i ; 1 ! ! , 1 5 / ' .441-,..4 .... ...Mt{ .t.t. -1.0. 7777.7777• '7 I ! 1 i 1 7 I i L ; t i 1 i • , $ • s s I 1 7 3 • 3 • • 1 3 • i • • i • I • • i . •. • . ' I : : ! I ; • I • i • • i. ■ $ • s 1 1 . .: •• , 1 .i. • • • • . • - —; .• , ; t , is .. 5 • .....•, ••. . . • •• • • i . i $ ; ... • 1 • $ , 1 • $ . . , s • 5 .. , :' • ' / . ' . . ' ' . . 1 • s . 1 1 . ; 5. • . • 1, $ 1 $ . i — . s ... •• I 1 . s .. . : 1 i $ $ • i s l• . • .1 . • — 5 & , 1 • , . . 1 . , . .-. •-1. , 1 . ! . - ; t i . i• I 1 i 3 I . 3 i • 1 3 1 • 1 ; 33 I /3 3 i 7 i • , • I • ' . L.. .! , • i • i . . . i t . 1 , 't ! • . , i . • ; . t t i , .? • . 7 • 1 1 3 ; i 1 , s .......••••.....••••• ... .. I • • s. • s s i ' 1 • ' 's 't s • . s• I '; — • 1 • It • t • $ t ; • . . 1 E. $ 1 s s' s • s 's $ . $ • i • s s $.• s ./1 I ! , ; s t I s s ; s s S , ? A 4 : . i 1 1 i i 1 i s 1 ; • 1 ? $ i 1 3 3 I 1 1 7 7 i 1 1 3 ; 1 1 ; 3 / 1 • 1 • .' I i 1 1 1 3 7 1 7 1 1 1 1. 7 . „.. 7 • ., ••••.„, •-•3•• . • „ 3. t ■ 4 } 1 i A 4 4 • , , 1 i I ; i { ;., I . ; - 1 ! ; 1 ; ; 1 , i I f $ .... 1 .••■-• • • ; • • , 1 ) , I '.. ; I I 1 t i ; ( ( t i ; t i 1 1 t t 1 1 1 .1 't I 1 I i ...........,•......,-..., ...... - .........-.... _ • ........ . .• . ( i ; ( 1 7 ■ i i I A t j 't li t t t I ; t t 4 ; t ' . t 1 • ; . • ; ; .; 1 , • • ; I` 1 • i ; ' , f I . • . ; • 1 . ? 7., 1 1 . . 1 ,. .„ . ... , . ' !' i . 1 $ . , , . • ..,. . . , ., ■ , i ' ■ • i • t 't i •, ....,. �r- � . • • • i • - . • , • 17A f f 1 1 ; • • • • ,__•, .• • _ • .• • • . ••• ••• ••... _•• • 1 I i 1 i .1 ■ , 1 1 1 t . '' ; i '• . . i .; - • . ''' ,..1 . . .. i . i 1 . • ,,. -.. . . l■ i. t 1 i.. • . • • - , . • • . • i I i . 1 i . . • 1 • • • • • • .1 • i • . I 1 ! l; J• ! ! i I 3. 1 4.....11011111.111111.111.1111!" 41111111111111■11111111NNINNMP' • Nosommoni. .; i • ,(ME-KetlEar 1,7 • ; 1 -t--- 1 11 I • • • • • I t . , 1 , ; . , • , • , . , , ! . • .. , . . ■ , . . • 1 . . .. . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . . 1 • , , t I . , I . i ' ; ! . . i . , t , I ■ ; 1 ! I I 1 • I ■ L i . ■ . . . . . . 1 I • • 1 '■ ■ I . ' . . '1 ' 4 i 1 I . 1 1 • ; I ; " 1 1. 1 c .!, • ! • •- I • 1 • .■ 1 i c 1 • , • ; , , • 1 ! . !• 1 , • ! . . . `, ; 1 • ., • 1 , ; 1- c , 1 c • As' ............. :.......... li„.;‘ . A ±.A■1101.% I." iloaA LAI ii • 1 1 • i L. • i i 1 1 1 1 c ! c ! i I • ______t_______.______ ___ _ _ . . . " ,• , . . 1 • • • _ ‘ 1 1 • • . I i I • • 11.1111111111111111111111■111■1111111111/ , • I • • 1 411 • t • • • „ . . . i t ; ! • • • I ` 4010.v tkit egt...mb 15- "' 1 Iv& Cd] • ter We, 41••111!•0114 1 t 0 ._i .. F RECEIVED NOV 2 1993 DEVECOMMTY Foy wive a ma no olTrar my so No no No ow in tut woman on:INIMIAll. g 1 • 1 )4 1 1 1 1 1 ".• 5->k1611 -T12- • • :Op sT EA6r, s HUD rim NA. 1.• arn mu. =No I., al _ 01-161,6 ie -rip! ff.; .1' LU / • / 2 El.?. t7r)e • CJ Tit). t EN! TV 11.1 III A1,1611 tri 01i • 1 1 6,v bev viii4 1-11- -.112&11..1241117.54.1- r I 1-11611 6.4_ 2 bci ao 2, 4.12 1 1 1 •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .HAFIv16/4.:41(21-1-1V 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Eta NMI - . .,,,..11,9,11-111111■1■1...111 INN MIN MI OM ill am on ato no lay out yys Ea raw in an t-4 IMMINVAir - Nave • •-- 111...1111112,...) alb 11.1••••■■• Am on mu :My was Imer am ma um Nu locam milm:as awe I , 11.! • 1 :1 1 1 1 0 1 • 1 4 5-)061.1 N6 112-f=e m :IsT sviLD Notor mii um --- sailiTiTIN mum im LleArr 2. EZ), FCk 1 0 1 1 11 A 11 'I'll III 'II ALi611 1,1 rill ill • I I / kio rpkg AT 112&-.11.121-11-11).STiwil. C,J fl N161-1 1,4- 2 59 00 0, 427 ±1,016/5.f-s1611-m "Th 10,FM. 1 ar 1 • • i • • • ... i:. .: {., ;e, Hr WIRY 0 2 19 94 5, (49 -II` 5i • • • • • r•• QQI .fir h 1 1 • • • $41 - — • ,titt? to, • 1;74t1P"'". • • • • • „ • ' �i iri� mir�iJ Pm • AC/ e.•■•■ .4"•4Ner_otrz.r vat cif • REC F_ MN 02 DEVELOP hit E.s\, i RECEIVED. MW 021 commUNl i Y DEVELOPMENT RECEIVED (• 021994 comiviuNi Y DEVELOPMENT