Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L06-030 - CITY OF TUKWILA - SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS
SIGN CODE REVISIONS SIGN CODE AMENDMENTS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT COMPREHENISVE LAND USE AMENDMENT CITY WIDE L06 -030 C doc: DNS City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670 File Number: E06 -011 Applied: 06/09/2006 Issue Date: 06/28/2006 Status: APPROVED Applicant: BRANDON MILES Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development is proposing to modify TMC Chapter 19 "Signs ". The modifications would permit public facilities to install electronic changing message displays. The proposed code amendments apply citywide. Location of Proposal: Address: 6300 SOUTHCENTER BL TUKW Parcel Number: 0003200005 Section/Township /Range: CITYWIDE The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. C-, Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) J 0042. 2 7 7 Oo( Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) E06 -011 Printed: 06 -26 -2006 WHEREAS, in 2002, Auburn Mayor, Peter B. Lewis, designated an Ad Hoc Sign Code Committee to review the City's existing sign code regulations and to suggest amendments, as warranted; and, WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Sign Code Committee represented a wide range of community interests including, as examples, a representative from the Chamber of Commerce, Auburn Downtown Association, City Council, Planning Commission, sign company, real estate industry and other city boards and commissions; and, WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Sign Code committee established purposes for its work including, • Providing community input on the then existing sign code's strengths and weaknesses; • Serving as representatives of respective professions and/or community affiliations in addressing the sign code; • Reviewing the size, number, types, and area of signs that are currently allowed; and • Reviewing and suggesting improvements to the sign code to meet the certain goals; and, WHEREAS the Ad Hoc Sign Code Committee identified desired outcomes for its work on a sign code including, • Recognizing that the function of signage is to effectively communicate information to targeted audiences; . Recognizing the importance of commercial signage, both for the current and future economic vitality of the city, municipal revenues, and the success of businesses that make important investments in such commercial signage; • Ensuring (without unduly compromising the purpose or function of commercial signage) that signs in the city to not unreasonably degrade the aesthetic character of the city; • Providing for reasonable visibility for businesses; . Encouraging improved quality of signage design and materials in the city; Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 1 of 33 ORDINANCE NO. 5 9 9 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON AMENDING CHAPTER 18.56 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO SIGNS RECEIVED MAY 0 8 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Providing consistent, clear guidelines for all sign types; • Requirements that are easily explained and interpreted for both staff and applicants; • Incorporating tables and graphics in addition to code text; • Recognizing different signage needs for different districts and special developments; • Balancing corporate architecture with local character and context; and ▪ Including mechanisms for administrative interpretation and flexibility; and, WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Sign Code Committee sought to recommend amendments that, • Support the above outcomes; • Are supported by their respective constituent groups; and • Meet the needs of both city staff and the community as a whole to the greatest extent possible; and, WHEREAS, the Ad Hoc Sign Code Committee finalized its recommendation on a sign code update in the summer of 2004; and, WHEREAS, at about that same time, in June 2004 a federal district trial court decision ruled that the different treatment of signs based on a sign's content in the absence of a rational reason for such a distinction and in the absence of a relationship between the content -based distinction and the safety and aesthetic goals is unconstitutional; and, WHEREAS, that decision is now on appeal at the United States Ninth District Court but has not yet been heard; and, WHEREAS, the outcome of the appeal has implications for how signs are regulated, including signage that has traditionally been regulated by content such as real estate signs; and, WHEREAS, pending an outcome of the case on appeal, a reasonable response would be for the City to maintain the City's existing sign code regulations related to real estate signs so that the City's regulation are no more content based than they are currently and then to reevaluate those regulations based upon the outcome of the appeal currently in process; WHEREAS, this response is reflected in this ordinance; and, Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 2 of 33 WHEREAS, numerous study sessions were held with Planning Commission in the development of the updated and revised sign code; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearings, the City of Auburn Planning Commission on Wednesday January 4, 2006, conducted a public hearing on the proposed new sign regulations; and, WHEREAS, at the public hearings the City of Auburn Planning Commission heard public testimony and took evidence and exhibits into consideration; and, WHEREAS, on January 23, 2006 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council made a recommendation to the Auburn City Council; and, WHEREAS, SEPA review (City SEPA file SEP05 -0005) was conducted on the proposed sign amendments with a Determination of Non - Significance issued April 13, 2005, a final DNS issued with no appeals having been filed; and, WHEREAS, the proposed sign amendments was sent to the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development and other State agencies for the 60- day review process in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106 and received by DCTED on February 10, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. AMENDMENT TO CITY CODE. That Chapter 18.56 of the Auburn City Code, entitled "Signs" is amended to read as follows: Sections: 18.56.010 laufposelntent. 18.56.020 Definitions. 18.56.025 Real Estate Signs. 18.56.030 General Provisions, all districts. 18.56.040 Special -signs- Regulation by District. 18.56.050 GcnoralAdministrative provisions. 18.56.060 €- xeahptie s,Deviations, variances and appeals. 18.56.070 Prohibited-signs, Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 3of33 Chapter 18.56 SIGNS 18.56.1 -44070 18.56.4 -28080 Liability. Conflicts repealed. 18.56.010 Purposelntent. The overall purpose of this chapter is to enhance and maintain the aesthetic character, to promote the public health, safety and general welfare, and to increase the effectiveness of visual communication in the city. This chapter is also intended to avoid visual clutter that may adversely impact traffic and pedestrian safety, or be adverse to property values, business opportunities and the City's appearance and to prevent and abate public nuisances. The purpose of this chapter is implemented by controlling the onstruction, location, use and maintenance of all signs and sign structures. It is also the intent of this chapter to afford non - commercial speech the same or greater protection afforded commercial speech and to not regulate non- commercial speech to a stricter standard than commercial speech. (Ord. 4773 § 1, 1995; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.56.020 Definitions. The following definitions are specific to this chapter and are to be used only for the implementation of this chapter: A. " "Animated sign" means any sign that flashes or simulates motion with an electronic or manufactured source of supply or contains wind actuated motion (except for flags and banners). An animated sign may also be a sign that meets the definition of "changing message center" or "revolving sign ". B. lampbank "Banner" means a temporary sign constructed of fabric, vinyl, or other durable material; which is not the primary identification for the organization, event or product advertised; and which is primarily promotional in nature. • C. - - • _ . sign height 15 fcet "Billboard" means a large outdoor advertising sign containing a message, commercial or otherwise, unrelated to the use or activity on the property on which the sign is located and/or to any use or activity in the immediate area (such as is the case with an off - premise sign) and which is customarily leased for commercial Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 4 of 33 purposes. The approximate sizes of the billboard faces range from twelve (12) to fourteen (14) feet in height and twenty -four (24) to forty -eight (48) feet in width. D. "li _ . _ : . _ _ .. . _ - _ "Changing message center" means an electronically controlled public service time and temperature sign; message center; or signs that display different copy changes of a public service or commercial nature on the same lamp bank. For purposes of the sign code, a changing message center shall mean a "readerboard sign ". E. "Directional sign" means a sign which is located to guide or direct pedestrian or vehicular traffic to parking entrances, exits, and service areas, and may not exceed six (6) square feet in area or ten (10) feet in height. For projects that have parking Tots in excess of 500 spaces, then the siqn area may be ten (10) square feet and the sign height fifteen (15) feet. F. "Double -faced sign" means a sign with two (2) faces. G. "Electrical sign" means a sign or sign structure in which electrical wiring, connections, and /or fixtures are used as part of the sign proper. H. "Facade" means the entire building front, or street wall face, including grade to the top of the parapet or eaves, and the entire width of the building elevation. G. 1. "Flashing sign" means an electrical sign or a portion thereof which changes light intensity in a sudden transitory burst, or which switches on and off in a constant pattern in which more than one -third of the nonconstant light source is off at any one time. I J. "Freestanding sign" means a sign attached -te -that meets the definition of , ground - • - - - - - 2 - -- - - - . - - - - • - sign " (also ommonly referred to as a monument sign), or "pole sign}." Signs attached to fences or other structures that are not defined as buildings will be considered freestanding signs. 4K. "Frontage" means the measurement, in linear feet, of the length of the property line er -for a single tenant building €rentor length of leased building frontage for multi- tenant buildings or multi - building complexes. L. "Grade" means the relative existing ground level in the immediate vicinity of the sign. KM. "Ground sign" means a sign attached to the around and supported by the ground or a built up landscaped area such that the sign appears solid with the ground. The height of a ground sign shall be measured from the surrounding grade. Also commonly referred to as a monument sign. N. "Identification sign" means a sign containing the name of the business establishment, occupant of the building or tenant space and /or address of the premises. O. "Incidental sign" means a small -sign that is generally informational and of a noncommercial nature intended primarily for the convenience of the public and having a maximum area of two square feet. Incidental signs include, but are not limited to: signs designating restrooms, hours of operations, entrances and exits to buildings and parking lots, help wanted, public telephones, etc. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 5of33 Also included are property control and warning signs such as "no trespassing," "no dumping," etc., and plaques, tablets or inscriptions which are an integral part of a building. I P. "Mansard roof" means a sloped roof or roof -like facade architecturally able to be treated as a building wall. MQ. "Marquee" means a permanent structure attached to, supported by, and projecting from a building and providing protection from the weather elements. For the purpose of this chapter, a freestanding, permanent roof -like structure providing protection from the elements, such as a service station gas pump islaedcanopy, will also be considered a marquee. The term "marquee" also includes canopy. NR. "Marquee sign" means any sign which forms part of or is integrated into a marquee and which does not extend horizontally beyond the limits of such marquee. For the purpose of this chapter a marquee sign will be considered as a wall sign. OS. "Median sign" means a sign that is placed within the median of a public street. T. "Multiple - building complex" means a group of commercial or industrial structures, developed as a group either simultaneously or in phases, with more than one building per parcel. 14J. "Multiple- tenant building" means a single structure housing more than one retail business, office or commercial venture but not including residential apartment buildings, which share the same lot, access and /or parking facilities. QV. "On- premises sign" means a sign which carries advertisements incidental to a lawful use of the premises on which it is located, including signs indicating the business transacted at, services rendered, goods sold or produced on the premises, name of the person, fi rm or corporation occupying the premises. RW. "Off- premises sign" means any sign which advertises an establishment, merchandise, service, goods, or entertainment which is sold, produced, and manufactured, or furnished at a place other than on the property on which said sign is located. SX. "Parapet" means a false front or wall extension above the roof -line. TY. "Perimeter" means a square or rectangle required to enclose the sign area. VZ. "Portable sign" means any sign made of any material, including paper, cardboard, wood or metal, which is capable of being moved easily and is not permanently affixed to the ground, structure or building. This also includes sidewalk or sandwich board signs, except those worn by a person. WAA. "Premises" means the real estate as a unit, which is involved by the sign or signs mentioned in this chapter. • . Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 6 of 33 ZBB. "Projecting sign" means a sign which is attached to a structure or building wall in such a manner that the leading edge extends more than sixteen (16) inches beyond the surface of said structure or wall but does not extend more than five (5) feet beyond the property line, extends no more than six (6) inches above any roofline, and meets all standards for ground clearance. Signs that meet the definition of "marquee sign" or "suspended sign" will not be considered a "projecting sign." CC. "Real estate sign" means a portable sign erected by the owner, or histhe owner's agent, advertising the real estate upon which the sign is located for rent, lease or sale, _ AADD. "Revolving sign" means any sign which rotates or turns in motion by electrical or mechanical means in a circular pattern building- silheeefte- CGEE. "Roof sign" means a sign erected upon or above a roof or parapet of a building or structure. Mansard roof signs shall be considered as wall signs. Roof signs may not extend more than five (5) feet in height above the roof. DDFF. "Sign" means any visual communication device, structure, or fixture which is visible from any right -of -way intended to aid land use in promoting the sale or identification of a product, goods or service using graphics, symbols, or written copy. For the purpose of this chapter, a sign shall not be considered to be building or structural design. It shall be restricted solely to graphics, symbols, or written copy that is meant to be used in the aforementioned way. This definition shall include inflatable signs, balloons or other similar devices. €EGG. "Sign area" means: 1. 4,—The total area of a sign visible from any one viewpoint or direction, excluding the sign support structure, architectural embellishments, or framework whishthat contains no written copy, and includes only one side of a double -faced sign. 2. 2. Individual letter signs using a wall as the background without added decoration or change in wall color shall be calculated by measuring the perimeter enclosing each letter. The combined total area of each individual letter shall be considered the total area of the sign. 3. 3— Module signs consisting of more than one sign cabinet shall be computed by adding together the total area of each module. 4. 4-Perimeter er–of sign area shall be established by the smallest rectangle enclosing the extreme limits of the letter module or advertising message being measured. FFHH. "Sign height" means the vertical distance measured from the adjacent grade to the highest point of the sign. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page7of33 a 6G11. "Sign structure" means any structure whir# -that supports or is capable of supporting any sign as defined in this chapter. A sign structure may be a single pole or may or may not be an integral part of the building or structure. ##JJ. "Single tenant building" means a commercial building or structure that contains one enterprise or occupant - • _ = - - - - - - = - =. Buildings within a multibuiiding complex may not be considered a single tenant building. "Special Event signage" means temporary signs including posters, flags, pennants, and inflatable materials; which are not the primary identification for the organization, event or product advertised; and which are primarily intended for ver}Lshort-term promotional periods. LL. "Suspended sign" means a sign that is attached to and suspended from a marquee or canopy, and subject to right -of -way and clearance regulations. MM. "Temporary sign" means any sign or advertising display constructed of wood, vinyl, cloth, canvas, Tight fabric, paper, cardboard, or other light materials, with or without frames, intended to be displayed for a limited time only. This definition shall include inflatable signs. NN. "Traffic hazard" means any sign which does not meet city standards for clear zone or sight distance or which does not meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 8 of 33 18.56.025 Real Estate Signs. No sign permit is required, except as provided in subsection F below. All exterior real estate signs must be of wood or plastic or other durable material. The permitted signs are as follows: A. Residential "for sale" and "sold" signs: such signs shall be limited to one (1) sign per street frontage not to exceed five (5) square feet in sign area per side, placed entirely on the property for sale, and not to exceed a height of seven (7) feet. B. Residential directional "open house" signs: such signs shall be limited to one (1) sign per street frontage on the premises for sale and three (3) off - premises signs. However, if a broker /agent has more than one (1) house open for inspection in a single development or subdivision, he /she is limited to four (4) off - premises "open house" signs in the entire development or subdivision. Such signs are permitted only during daylight hours and when the broker /agent or seller or an agent is in attendance at the property for sale. No such sign shall exceed five (5) square feet in sign area per side. The sign may be placed along the periphery of a public right -of -way, provided it does not interfere with traffic safety, but it may not be attached to a utility pole or traffic safety device. C. Undeveloped commercial and industrial property "for sale or rent" signs: One (1) sign per street frontage advertising undeveloped commercial and industrial property for sale or for rent is permitted while the property is actually for sale or rent. The sign shall not exceed thirty -two (32) square feet in sign area per side and eight (8) feet in height. D. Developed commercial and industrial property "for sale or rent" signs: One (1) sign per street frontage advertising a commercial or industrial building for rent or sale is permitted while the building is actually for rent or sale. If one face of the building is less than ten (10) feet from the building line, the sign shall be placed on the building or in a window. The sign shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height, if freestanding, it shall be located more than fifteen (15) feet from any abutting property line and a public right - of -way line. Said sign shall not exceed thirty -two (32) square feet in sign area per side. E. Undeveloped residential property "for sale" signs: One sign per street frontage advertising undeveloped residential property for sale is permitted not exceeding thirty -two (32) square feet in area per side, nor exceeding a height of eight (8) feet. If the sign is greater than five (5) square feet in area, it must be placed more than thirty (30) feet from the abutting property line. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 9 of 33 00. "Wall sign" means a sign attached or erected parallel to and extending not more than sixteen (16) inches from the facade or face of any building to which it is attached and supported through its entire length, with the exposed face of the sign parallel to the plane of said wall or facade. "Window signs" which do not meet the definition of a "Temporary Sign" shall be considered as wall signs. PP. "Window sign" means a sign located inside or affixed to windows of a building, whether temporary or permanent, lighted or unlighted, which may be viewed from the exterior of the building. (Ord. 4705 § 2, 1994; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) F. Additional signs: The Planning, Building and Community Director may grant a special permit to allow temporary off - premises signs in addition to those permitted above, not to exceed five (5) square feet in size per side, or forty -two (42) inches in height. Notice of adjacent property owners shall not be required. Such additional signs may be used to advertise open houses, to provide directions to new developments, or similar purposes. Such signs may be placed along the periphery of the public right -of -way, provided they do not interfere with traffic safety, but they may not be attached to utility poles or traffic safety devices. The Planning, Building and Community Director shall determine the number and locations of such signs, and the period during which they may be displayed. The Planning, Building and Community Director shall take into account the number of existing signs in any proposed location, and shall limit or prohibit new ones so as to prevent a traffic safety hazard or a detrimental effect on neighboring property. 18.56.030 . General Provisions, all districts. permitted signs in R R, R S, LHRS, R 1, and LHR1 zoncc. Community A. Skins. 1. Real cctatc: cee ACC 18.56.040(C); 2. Homo occupation: cee ACC 18.60.020 (H); total arc3; The Planning, Building and Community Director may approve and permit to be erected entrance signs, at or near the city limits, on City public right -of -way or on privately owned parcels with the owner's permission, on which may be listed institutional names, service clubs or organizations or points of interest or similar public information. Right of way use permits may be required for signs located in the public right -of -way. B. Permitted signs in R 2, LHR2, R 3, and LHR3 zoncs:Temporary Signs. 1. Rctial ostatc: soc ACC 18.56.040(C); 2. Homo occupation: soo ACC 18.60.020 (H); 3. Political: cee ACC 18.56.010(B); Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 10 of 33 total aroa; feet in area and '12 feet in height• square feet por faco and 12 feet in height, signs; 1. Special Event signage may be allowed subject to the following a. Use of such signage is limited to ten (10) days per display, not to exceed ten (10) days in any ninety (90) day period; b. The area of any single sign shall not exceed thirty (30) square feet; 2. Banners may be allowed subject to the following: a. No more than two such signs may be used per site at any given time; b. Use of such signs is limited to ninety (90) consecutive days, and may not exceed ninety (90) days in any 120 -day period; c. The area of any single banner shall not exceed 120 square feet. 3. Signs which are placed upon or within a window and which are intended to be viewed from the right of way shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the window area. 4. Permits are not required, except that signs exceeding the allowable size and time duration must receive a permit issued by the Planning, Building and Community Director if special circumstances exist that warrant the additional signage. C. Permitted signs in R 1, LHR4, RO, R MHP, LHRMHP, P 1, LHP1, I, and LHI zones: 1. Real octate: coc ACC 18.56.040(C); 2. Homo occupation: ccc ACC 18.60.020 (H); .. 1 4. Directional; Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 11 of 33 total ar 6. Frooctanding: .. - Civic Events. Street hanners may be permitted subject to approval and installation in accordance with rules and procedures established by the City of Auburn Public Works Department. D. 1. 2. 3. total -ten Wall: Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 12 of 33 Roal estate: sec ACC 18.56.040(C); Political: cee ACC 18.56.040(B); Diroctional; 6. Temporary signs, oxtornal to a building: see ACC 18.56.010(E)(1), this 7. Portable: soo ACC 18.56.010(D); 8. Frooctanding: Sign 6 i Provisions. 1. All lighting shall be arranged to reflect away from any residential zone. No person shall construct, establish, create or maintain any stationary exterior lighting or illumination system or any interior system which is intended to be viewed from a street, highway or other public thoroughfare used for vehicular traffic which system contains or utilizes: a. Any exposed incandescent Tamp with wattage in excess of twenty -five (25) watts b. Any exposed incandescent lamp with a metallic reflector, c. Any exposed incandescent lamp with an external reflector, d. Any revolving beacon light, e. Any continuous or sequential flashing operation, except for changing message center signs; 2. The provisions of section D.1, above, shall not apply to: a. Lighting systems owned or controlled by any public agency for the purpose of directing or controlling navigation, traffic, or highway or street illumination, b. Aircraft warning lights. E. Permitted cigns in C 1, LHC1, C 2, and BP zones: lea; 2. Political: coe ACC 18.56.010(B); 3. Directional; 7. Portable: ccc ACC 18.56.040(0); Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 13 of 33 .Sign Lighting 0. Construction Provisions, Sight Distance, Exposed Angle Iron and Wire. 1. Each sign shall be adequately constructed in accordance with the requirement of the International Building Codes, as amended: 2. Signs containing electrical circuitry shall meet the requirements of the National Electrical Code and all state laws, and shall include an approved testing lab sticker. 3. Signs must meet vehicular sight distance requirements established by the city engineer pursuant to ACC 18.48.020(B). 4. When a proiectinq sign is used, no angle irons, quy wires or braces shall be visible, except those that are an integral part of the overall design, such as decorative metals or woods, or unless they are required for safety. F. Wall: Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 14 of 33 • _ .. • =- - 1. Real ectatc: ccc ACC 18.56.01 CC 18.56.010(6); 3. Directional; Freoctanding: one sign per street Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 15 of 33 The holder of a permit, for the duration thereof, shall have the right to change the advertising copy on the structure or sign for which the permit was issued without being required to pay any additional fees. G. Exemptions Unless otherwise specified or unless expressly prohibited, it is not the intent of this Chapter to regulate the following signs. a. The flap of a government or noncommercial institutions such as schools, with the poles treated as structures; b. Official public notices, official court notices; c. Incidental signs (see ACC 18.56.020(0), Definitions); d. Signs not visible from public right -of -way; e. Lettering or symbols painted directly onto or flush- mounted magnetically onto an operable vehicle. f. Painting, repainting, cleaning, repairing, and other normal maintenance unless structural or electrical changes are made; p. Religious symbols not attached to a permitted sign; h. Memorial signs or tablets, names of building, dates of erection and the like, which are incorporated into the building material and facade; i. Signs required by law, traffic or pedestrian control signs, signs indicating scenic or historic points of interest, which are erected by or on the order of a public officer in the performance of his or her public duty; j. Sculptures, fountains, mosaics, and design features which do not incorporate advertising or identification. k. Temporary signs limited exclusively to non - commercial speech. H. Prohibited signs. From and after the effective date of this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to erect or place within the city, except as otherwise authorized: 1. A swinging projecting sign; 2. Portable signs, except as permitted by ACC 18.56.025 (Real Estate Signs) and ACC 18.56.040(E) (C2 District); 3. Banners, pennants, ribbons, streamers, spinners, rotating or blinking lights, strings of lights, or similar devices, except as permitted by ACC 18.56.030(B) (Temporary Signs); 4. Flashing signs, except as permitted in ACC 18.56.030(D) (Lighting Provisions); 5. Signs attached to, or placed on, a vehicle or trailer parked on private or public property that is not associated with the business advertised on said sign(s). This provision is not to be construed as prohibiting the identification of a firm or its principal products on a vehicle used in the normal course of business. This does not include automobile for sale signs or signs attached to franchised buses or taxis; 6. Private signs placed in or on a public right-of-way: except for as expressly permitted by this chapter; Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 16 of 33 7. Any sign which constitutes a traffic hazard or detriment to traffic safety by reason of its size, location, movement, coloring, or method of illumination, or by obstructing the vision of drivers, or detracting from the visibility of any official traffic control device by diverting or tending to divert the attention of drivers of moving vehicles from traffic movement on streets, roads, intersections, or access facilities. No sign shall be erected so that it obstructs the vision of pedestrians by glare or method of illumination constitutes a hazard to traffic. No sign may use words, phrases, symbols or characters in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic; 8. Any sign or advertising structure or supporting structure that is torn, damaged, defaced or destroyed; 9. Signs attached to poles installed by governmental agencies, utility poles, trees, rocks or other natural features; 10. Signs attached to benches, garbage cans, or other street furniture located within the public right -of way. 11. Rotating signs. 12. Billboards. 13. Any sign which does not structurally or materially conform to the requirements of the City's adopted International Building Code. 1. Nonconforming signs. Permanent signs established legally prior to the adoption of this chapter that do not conform to the regulations of this chapter with regard to number, size, height or location shall be allowed to remain as legal nonconforminq_signs except as follows: 1. Whenever a new building replaces the principal building. 2. When there is an expansion of an existing building, the requirements of this section shall apply only if there is an increase in floor area of twenty -five (25) percent or more (including the cumulative increase of previous expansions after the effective date of the ordinance amending this section). 3. Whenever a non - conforming use is replaced by a conforming use, the requirements of this section shall apply in full to the new use if and only if there is a change in required signage due to the zoning district. 4. Any sign, including the sign structure, now or hereafter existing which no longer advertises a bona fide business conducted or a product sold. Such sign(s) shall be taken down and removed by the owner, agent or person having the beneficial use of the land, building or structure upon which such sign may be found within ninety (901 days after written notification from the building official. J. Master Sign Plans Authorized The Planning, Building and Community Director has the authority to require a master sign plan to ensure a consistent and coordinated signage scheme for development proposals. In approving Master Sign Plans under the provisions of this subsection, the Director has the authority to approve signage schemes that allow for signs greater in area and height than allowed in the particular zone in which the development is located when a coordinated signage scheme is used. Master signage Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 17 of 33 1 plans shall be recorded. (Ord. 5342 § 2, 2000; Ord. 4705 § 2, 1994; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.56.040 A. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 18 of 33 Special- signs-Regulation by District • d -s - to R R, R -S, LHRS, R -1, LHR -1, R -2, LHR -2, R -3, LHR -3, R -4, LHR-4, R -MHP, LHRMHP Zoning districts (non - residential uses, except as noted) 1. Residential entry monument: A cumulative area of fifty (50) square feet or ten (10) feet in height (highest point of sign structure) not to exceed two (2) per entrance provide that no sign exceeds thirty -two (32) square feet in area. 2. Maximum sign area of all signs is forty (40) square feet per frontage. 3. Freestanding signs a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage not to exceed two (2) total freestanding signs per property. b. Maximum height: Ten (10) feet. c. Maximum area: Thirty -two (32) square feet per face, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every three (3) lineal feet of frontage. The minimum entitlement for freestanding signs shall be one (1) sixteen (16) square foot sign for those sites with frontages less than 48 feet. 4. Wall signs (for building or tenant space): a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage not to exceed two (2) total wall signs per building b. Maximum area: Thirty -two (32) square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every three (3) lineal feet of frontage. The minimum entitlement for wall signs shall be one (1) sixteen (16) square foot sign for those sites with frontages less than 48 feet. 5. Signs may be indirectly illuminated only. B. Political- Signs. ; b. Location; Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 19 of 33 Sizc of signs. - _ • R -O. RO -H C -N, C -1, LHC -1, B -P Zoning districts (non - residential uses) 1. Maximum sign area of all signs is 150 square feet per frontage. 2. Freestanding signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage not to exceed two (2) total. b. Maximum height: Twenty -two (22) feet, ten (10) feet in the RO zone. c. Maximum area: 100 square feet per face, 75 square feet per face in the RO zone, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every two (2) lineal feet of frontage. Minimum entitlement for freestanding signs shall be one (1) sign at thirty two (32) square feet for those sites with less than sixty -four (64) feet of frontage. d. If permitted, the 2nd freestanding sign shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for a single freestanding sign and 150 feet measured in a straight - line distance must separate multiple pole signs. 3. Wall signs (for buildinq or tenant space): a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage. b. Maximum area: 100 square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every 1.5 lineal feet of frontage. For multi- tenant buildings where free - standing signage contains the name of not more than one (1) tenant business (e.g., a prime tenant name or a shopping center name), an additional twenty -five (25) percent of wall signaqe per tenant space shall be allowed. This increase in signage shall not apply to minimum entitlement for wall signs, which shall be one (1) sign at sixteen (16) square feet. • c. Signs may be directly or indirectly illuminated. 4. Suspended signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) per entrance. b. Maximum area: Six (6) square feet per face. c. Minimum clearance is eight (8) feet from sign to grade. 5. Proiectinq signs: a. (Not permitted in, C -N, R -O or RO -H.) b. Total number permitted: One (1) in lieu of a permitted freestanding sign. c. Maximum height: Height requirement of the zoning district. d. Maximum area: Fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for single freestanding sign. c. Real Estate Signs. No sign perm 1 Residential "for sale" and "sold" cigns: such signc chall be limited to one Lee calo. If ono face of the building is let-,G Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 20 of 33 P -1, LHP -1, "I ", LHI zones 1. Freestanding signs a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage not to exceed two (2) total. b. Maximum height: Eighteen (18) feet. c. Maximum area: Eighty (80) square feet per face, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every two (2) lineal feet of frontage. The minimum entitlement for freestanding signs is one (1) sign at thirty two (32) square feet. d. If permitted, the 2nd freestanding sign shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for a single freestanding sign and 150 feet measured in a straight - line distance must separate multiple pole signs. e. For projects, parcels or complexes that have a single street frontage and more than 300 feet of street frontage, a changing message center sign may be permitted for a total of two (2) signs per frontage subject to the following: Only one (1) changinq message center is provided. ii. Multiple signs are separated by at least 150 feet. iii. The combined area of the two (2) signs does riot exceed 120 square feet in size and neither sign is greater than eighty (80) square feet in size. 2. Wall signs (for building or tenant space): a. Total number permitted: Two (2) per street frontage. b. Maximum area: Fifty (50) square feet for total of all wall signs per frontage. c. D. sub' Signs may be directly or indirectly illuminated - -- -- - Exicting portable cigns which do Sign permits arc not requircd.L F, M -1, M -2 Zoning districts 1. Maximum sign area of all signs is 150 square feet /frontage 2. Freestanding signs: a. Total number permitted: Two (2) per frontage not to exceed four (4) total. b. Maximum height: Thirty (30) feet. c. Maximum area: 125 square feet per face, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every two (2) lineal feet of frontage. Minimum entitlement for freestanding signs is thirty two (32) square feet for those sites without sixty four (64) feet of frontage. d. The total area of freestanding si 1ns on any given frontage shall not exceed the area allowed for a single freestanding sign. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 21 of 33 e. The maximum height of signs located on a second or third frontage shall be twenty (20) feet. f. Multiple freestanding signs must be separated by 150 feet measured in a straight -line distance. 3. Wall signs (for building or tenant space): a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage. b. Maximum area: 100 square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every 1.5 lineal feet of frontage. 4. Projecting signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) in lieu of a permitted freestanding sign. b. Maximum height: Height requirement of the zoning district. c. Maximum area: Fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for single freestanding sign. E. T-enporafy-Signs, are intondcd to announce the opening of a new businocs, celebrate businccc section; additional &ignape. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 22 of 33 C 2 Zoning District 1. Maximum sign area of all signs is 200 square feet 2. Hanging signs that are designed to display the availability of a specific product in a business, limited to three (3) square feet and no more than two (2) such signs per business, shall be considered permanent signs, but shall not be calculated as part of the maximum allowed signage. 3. Freestanding signs: a. Freestanding signs are not allowed on properties abutting or oriented toward Main Street. b. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage not to exceed two (2) total. c. Maximum height: Twenty (20) feet d. Maximum area: Seventy -five (75) square feet per face, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of frontage. Minimum entitlement for freestanding signs shall be one (1) sign at 32 square feet. 4. Wall signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) per frontage. b. Maximum area: 150 square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every one (1) lineal foot of frontage. For multi - tenant buildings where freestanding signage contains the name of not more than one (1) tenant business (e.g., a prime tenant name or a shopping center name), an additional twenty - five (25) percent of wall signage per tenant space shall be allowed. This increase in signage shall not apply to minimum entitlement for walls signs, which shall be one (1) sign at sixteen (16) square feet. 5. Suspended Sign: One (1) double -face Suspended sign, not exceeding three (3) square feet per face may be allowed for each business entrance. There shall be a minimum of eight (8) feet of clearance between the grade and the sign. 6. Portable Signs. One (1) portable sign may be allowed for each business entrance, not to exceed one (1) portable sign per building frontage, subject to the following: a. May be placed within public right -of -way subject to the guidelines provided by the Planning, Building and Community Director in consultation with the City Engineer such that sign does not interfere with pedestrian or vehicular traffic and conforms to the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. b. May not exceed thirty -six (36) inches in height and thirty (30) inches in width and be limited to two faces. c. May be displayed during business hours only. d. Must be constructed of either wood or another sturdy material to ensure stability in the wind. e. May not move, spin, flash, or otherwise be animated. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 23 of 33 f. Shall meet applicable supplemental design requirements of the Auburn Downtown Association. 7. Supplemental Sign Standards, C2 Zone a. Sign design and construction i. All signs, other than temporary signs, shall be made of professional, durable materials such as wood, metal. and /or glass. ii. Signs that are indirectly illuminated shall have their light sources shielded from view. iii. Internally illuminated signs are not permitted abutting or oriented toward Main Street. b. Sign Placement i. Signs shall be oriented toward pedestrian visibility and shall be positioned at such a height as to be readable by pedestrians. ii. Externally mounted wall signs shall not be mounted so as to block building windows. F. C -3 Zoning district 1. Freestanding signs: a. Total number permitted: Two (2) per frontage not to exceed four (4) total. b. Maximum height: Thirty (30) feet. c. Maximum area: 200 square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every two (2) lineal feet of frontage. PROVIDED That the maximum size of any sign does not exceed 125 square foot per face. The minimum entitlement for freestanding signs is thirty -two (32) square feet for those sites without sixty -four (64) feet of frontage. d. The total area of freestanding signs on any given frontage shall not exceed the area allowed for a single freestanding sign. e. The maximum height of signs located on a second or third frontage shall be twenty (20) feet. 2. Wall signs (for building or tenant space): Maximum area: 125 square feet, calculated at a rate of one (1) square foot of sign area for every 1.5 lineal feet of frontage. 3. Projecting signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) in lieu of a permitted freestanding sign. b. Maximum height: Height requirement of the zoning district. c. Maximum area: Fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for single freestanding sign. 4. Suspended signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1). b. Maximum placement height: Twenty -five (25) feet. c. Maximum area: Six (6) square feet per face. d. Minimum clearance is eight (8) feet from sign to grade. 5. Off - premises signs: a. Total number permitted: One (1) per business and one per parcel. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 24 of 33 b. premises siq c. d. freestanding located. e. Must be within 750 feet of the business being advertised. f. Must be separated from any existing pole sign a minimum distance of 150 feet measured in a straight -line distance. p. Sign can be no more than two (2) faces. h. Signs may be directly or indirectly illuminated. (Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 25 of 33 Location: off - premises sign must be located in zone that permits off - ns. Maximum height: Twenty (20) feet. Maximum area: Fifty (50) percent of the area allowed for single sign, calculated using the feet of frontage of the site where the sign is Genefal•Administrative provisions. Permits Required. Except as provided in subsection (B) of this section, no signs shall hereafter be erected, re- erected, constructed, altered, or maintained, except as provided by this chapter and, when required, a building permit for the same has been issued by the building official. A separate permit shall be required for a sign or signs for each business entity and/or a separate permit shall be required for each group of signs on a single supporting structure. 1. Application for permits: application for sign permits shall be made to the building official on a form as provided by the building division. Such application shall require: a. Name of business and address where work is to be performed. b. Name and address of property owner. c. Name and title of the person completing the application. d. Name and address, telephone number of the person or firm doing the work and preferably the owner of said establishment. e. Washington contractor's registration number, industrial use permit number, sales tax number. f. A site plan showing location of the sign in relation to buildings, property lines and street right -of -way including the size and location of all existing signs on the property. q. A scale drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision showing size, height, copy, structural and footing details, and material specifications. h. A description of work to be performed and type of sign. i. Electrical load with name of electrical contractor responsible for installation of service feed wires if other than sign contractor. j. Structural engineer's stamp required on those signs and sign structures subject to wind and seismic forces. 2. Revocation of permit: the building official may, in writing, suspend or revoke a permit issued under provisions of this chapter whenever the permit is issued in error or on the basis of incorrect information supplied, or in violation of any ordinance or regulation or any of the provisions of this chapter. 3 Permit fee schedule: the fees prescribed in the city's fee schedule must be paid to the city for each sign installation for which a permit is required by this chapter and must be paid before any such permit is issued by the building official. Fees for building permits for each sign erected, installed, affixed, structurally altered, relocated, or created by painting shall be set in accordance with the city's fee schedule. 4. Sign permits shall be processed in accordance with the relevant timelines and procedures identified in Auburn City Code Title 14, "Project Review ". Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 26 of 33 • ee e -- - • • • • Aircraft warning lights, Interpretation. In all applications for permits where a matter of interpretation arises, the most restrictive definition shall prevail. watts; - viewed fer ---the E. Conctruction Provisions. 1. Each sign shall be adequately constructed in accordance with the Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 27 of 33 sticker. F. 1994; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 18.56.060 Ex°fi^ns.Deviations, variances and appeals. C. Religious symbolc; Change of Copy. The holder of a permit, for the duration thoreof, shall (Ord. 4705 § 2, • A. The Planning, Building and Community Director may grant up to a 50% deviation to the provisions of this sign code related to sign height and sign area. In a petition for a deviation, the Planning, Building and Community Director shall have the power and duty to review, decide, grant, grant with conditions or deny the requested deviation. The Planning, Building and Community Director may grant a deviation from the provisions of this chapter only when the deviation is within 50% of the entitlement and all of the following findings of fact are met. 1. The literal interpretation and strict application of the provisions and requirements would cause undue and unnecessary hardship because of unique or unusual conditions pertaining to the specific building, parcel or property in question; and 2. The granting of the requested deviation would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or incurious to the property or property owners in the vicinity; and 3. The granting of the deviation would not be contrary to the general objective and intent of this chapter, this title, or the comprehensive plan. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 28 of 33 Official public notices, official court noticcc; Incidental signs; B. An applicant requesting an administrative deviation under the provisions of this chapter shall submit the following, along with the required filing fee. C. A letter in memorandum format outlining how the request is consistent with the criteria of this subsection. D. A site plan that accurately drawn to an engineered scale of one (1) inch equals forty (40) feet, one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet, one (1) inch equals ten (10) feet that includes the following information: 1. Boundaries and dimensions of the site, 2. Location of buildings, parking areas and adjacent streets, 3. Graphic representations of all existing signs including their size, height and placement on the site. 4. Graphic representation of the proposed sign(s) subiect to the request, 5. Building elevation showing the placement of the sign on that elevation, if applicable. E. The action of the Planning, Building and Community Director rejecting, approving or modifying any decision or application is a final administrative decision subject to appeal to the city's Hearing Examiner. Appeals of administrative decisions with regard to this chapter shall be processed consistent with ACC 18.70.050 of this Title. F. The Planning, Building and Community Director shall render a written decision on the requested deviation request within seven (7) business days of submittal of all required elements and filing fee. G. Requests that exceed the 50% deviation or those not related to allowable sign height or sign area shall be processed as a Variance in accordance with ACC 18.70.010 of this Title. H. The Planning, Building and Community Director may allow for the repair or replacement of non - conforming signs that have a significant historical or cultural element or are integral components of a building roof or facade that has a significant historical or cultural element to which the sign is a contributing component. (Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) Signs attached to, or placed on, a vehicle or trailor parked on private or Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 29 of 33 J. Signs attached to bonchoc on public right of way. (Ord. 4705 § 2, 1094; Ord. 1229 § 2, 1987.) treated as a now sign. (Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) structure. feg Permits Required. No signs shall hereafter be erected, roorcctcd, Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 30 of 33 when • - • . • - - - • • . . . • Z. • - - = • - - - . . .. • • • The granting of thc requocted €. A scale drawing of thc proposed sign or sign revision showing cizc, arc met: vicinity; and 3 Permit foo schedule: tho fcos prcccribcd in tho city's foe cchedulc muct Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 31 of 33 3 Interpretation. In all applications for permitc whoro a matter of 1987.) 1 18.56.440070 Liability. This chapter shall not be constituted to relieve from or lessen the responsibility of any person owning, building, altering, constructing, removing or moving any sign in the city for damages to anyone injured or damaged either in person or property by any defect therein; nor shall the city, or any agent thereof, be held as assuming such liability by reason of permit or inspection authorized herein or a certificate of inspection issued by the city or any of its agents. (Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) 1 18.56.4 -20080 Conflicts repealed. All sections or parts of sections of the municipal code, all ordinances and all resolutions or parts of resolutions, in conflict herewith, be and the same, are repealed to the extent of such conflict. (Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.) Section 2. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3. IMPLEMENTATION. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 32 of 33 Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. ATTEST: Da 'elle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPRO ED AS TO FORM: aniel B. Held, City Attorney 1 A. Ordinance. No. 5993 January 30, 2006 Page 33 of 33 INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: FEB — 6 2006 FEB — 6 20nfi FEB — 6 2006 PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR City of Tukwila Memorandum TO: Planning Commission V FROM: Steve Lancaster, Director Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner RE: Proposed Changes to Title 19 "Sign Code" DATE: May 2, 2006 Issue The Tukwila School District has approached the City to amend Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) regarding certain types of signage. The amendments would be needed to allow Foster High School to install a changing message display. Analysis of Existing Code Title 19 of the TMC regulates are types of signage in the City. Unless specifically listed as exempted, a sign permit is required for all types of signs that are discernable from the adjacent properties and the City's rights of way (TMC 19.12.010). Any permanent signs, either freestanding or wall signs are required to have a sign permit. In all commercial and industrial zones most business, if they qualify, can have two signs. The business can choose from two wall signs or a freestanding and wall sign. The City applies different standards for signs located in residential zones. Under TMC 19.32.080 churches, schools, public facilities, and conditional uses may have one sign for every street they front. No sign may be greater than 50 square feet in size. Any use in the City may have an electronic message center as part of the sign. However, under TMC 19.08.030, if the sign changes more frequently than once every 24- hours, the sign would be considered an animated sign. Animated signs are strictly prohibited in the City (TMC 19.28.010). Tukwila School District has proposed an electronic message sign that would change copy more than once every 24 -hours and thus would not be permitted in the City. Legislative History It was in 2003, that the City restricted the number of times that a sign could change message to once every 24- hours. Prior to 2003, the City had the following definition of "animated sign" "Animated Sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, including rotation or on which lettering or figures appear to move due to flashing lights. However, changes in background or border lighting which occur at a rate of no more than ten times per minute and which utilize lamps of no more than 15 watts are classified as non - animated portions of signs" (Ord. 1274) The City's original 1982 definition was related to blinking lights, where the message remained stable, but the lights would flash on or around the message. In 2003, the definition of "animated sign" was amended to now read: "Animated Sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light or blinking or chasing lights, or which appear to move toward or away from the viewer, or expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or other portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 -hours (TMC 19.08.030) ". The City does permit any use that is allowed signage to display time and temperature and these two items may change more frequently than once every 24- hours. The City has not typically permitted change of message signs. Review of other South King County Regulations All adjacent Cities have some regulations regarding animated signs. City of Kent: Signs within seventy -five (75) feet of the public right -of -way which are animated, revolving more than eight (8) revolutions per minute, blinking or flashing, except public service signs such as those which give the time, temperature and humidity. Schools are considered public service signs. City of Seatac: Signs that display animation, as defined in SMC 15.16.020(1) [are not permitted]. Animation. Movement or the appearance of movement of a sign display through the use of patterns of lights, changes in color or light intensity, computerized special effects, video display, or through any other method; except for the scrolling of a static message or scene onto or off a sign board in one (1) direction per message. Note that animation is prohibited per SMC 15.16.110(D). City of Burien: Changealbe image signs are permitted in non - residential zones. The signs must be oriented for pedestrians and on -site viewing only. Changes in copy and /or graphics shall dissolve over a period of not less than 10 secounds and in the opinion of the Director shall not be a traffic distraction. City of Aubum: Impacts to Consider The following items should be considered in reviewing the proposed code amendment. 1) Does the Planning Commission want to allow animated signs within residential zones? By only allowing "public facilities" to have animated signs, a majority of these signs could be located in residential zones. While the school district currently has no plans to locate these signs at other schools, this code amendment would allow all schools in the City to have changing message displays. Additionally, all King County libraries, Fire Houses, and the Tukwila Community Center would be permitted to have a changing message sign. As attachment ( @) shows, most of these facilites are in residential zones. Animated and changing message signs tend to be illuminated and use lights. Thus, there could be an impact on surronding residence. Possible Mitigation 1. Hours of operation. If the Planning Commission chooses to allow such signs in residential zones, the City could impose limits on the hours of operation. For example, such signs could only operate from 7am to 1 Opm. The city does attempt to limit other impacts on residential property, for example construction noise in residential zones is limited to the following hours, 7am tol Opm Monday through Friday and 8am to 1 Opm, Saturday, Sunday, and State recongizied holidays (TMC 8.22.140). 2) What Traffic Impacts do animated /changing message signs have on d rivers? It is often believed that animated or changing message signs have an adverse impact on motorist who are passing by. It is thought that motorist will attempt to read a changing message sign and thus will not have their full attention on driving. However, research on this matter is mixed. Within your staff report you will find as attachment ( @) Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction by the Federal Highway Adminstration. The report notes that animated signs or changing message signs are an exterior stimuli and that exterior stimuli can be distracting for motrists, however, the report does not conclude that animated or changing message signs have any more of an impact than other exterior stimuli. Possible Mitigation If the City chooses to allow changing message signs at residential zones the following approaches could be used to mitigate any possible adverse impacts. 1. The message could be required to hold for a particular set time. For example the following message: "School Registration as Showalter August 12 th -1 5th II Would be required to hold at least ten (10) seconds. Additionally, how the message appears and dissappers could also be regulated. The City could require that a set message appears and dissappears with no flashing, movement, scrolling, scrambling, etc. 2. The City could restrict changing message signs to City streets that have a low speed limit. Accidents tend to increase as speed increase and more externior stimuli are indroduced to the driver. At lower speeds, a driver has more time to react to extenior stimuli. The City could limit message changing signs to streets that have a certain speend limit. Schools are located within residential zones and residential streets tend to have a speed limit of 25 mph. Staffs Proposal Planning Staff proposes the following changes to the sign code. Allow changing message displays for public facilities in residential zones. The following development standards shall apply: 1. The location of the sign, height, and setback must meet all other development standards oulined in Title 19. 2. The "changing message" porition of the sign may only occupy up to 50 percent of the allowabe sign area. 3. The sign shall only be permitted to operate from lam to lOpm. 4. The sign must meet the brightness and illumuniation standards laid out in TMC ( @). 5. The message must be stagent and must appear as a complete message. The message or images on the sign may not change more frequnetly than once every ten seconds. The changing message sign may not physically move, appears to flash, undulate, pulse or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light or blinking or chasing lights, or which appear to move toward or away from the viewer, or expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or other portrays movement or animation. When a message or image is replaced by another message or image it shall be done by removing the current message or image, holding the screen blank for .5 second and inserting a new text. A draft ordiancis attached with this Staff Report for review by the Planning Commission. The draft ordiance is in legslative format with proposed changes underlined and proposed deletions are shown in ctrikoacr through MEMO TO: Tukwila School District Board of Directors Tukwila City Council Members FROM: Bill Van De Bogert, School District Business Manager Email vandebogertb @tukwila.wednet.edu DATE: April 20, 2006 RE: Replacement of Existing Message Board in Front of Foster High School With A New Electronic LED Message Board. My memo is designed to provide ah opportunity to share information and invite your thoughts around a seemingly simple undertaking, the installation of an LED message board at Foster High School wherein, the School Board desires to install a LED message board, and the City Council maintains regulatory oversight (under TMC 19.28.010(3)) of message boards within city limits. I want to thank both the District Board of Directors and City Council Members for the opportunity to share a few thoughts about our request to replace the old message board with a new LED board. I recognize the need to process our request through appropriate permitting channels, . and we have already begun that process with the City Community Affairs and Parks Committee, our first meeting with them is next Tuesday. The existing reader board which is nine feet long and six feet high is a manual display system which limits types and frequency of messages. A new LED system would allow the district to communicate multiple messages about school activities to Tukwila families. Tukwila does not have a dedicated community newspaper to dispense information to families, and absent that communication vehicle an LED message board would provide the district with a simple method which bridges that communication void. The cost for a new LED Board is approximately $28,000, and measures eight feet long and four feet high which is smaller than the existing message board. The actual LED display is two feet high and runs the length of the board. The display can operate three lines of letters, each line can hold 19 characters, and can be changed as frequently as desired. The District is sensitive to permitting rules for LED message boards within the city. Permitting rules which are understandably based on the need to limit the size and types of LED's displays along city streets, and the District agrees with the city's rationale to control electronic signs. If left unchecked, undesirable flashing animated signs could become the predominant feature along Hwy. 99, and turn an otherwise simple business district into an unattractive Las Vegas style strip, with flashing lights and neon signs operating all night long. We think by working together with the permitting department we can protect both city restrictions, and maintain the spirit and integrity built into the existing rules around LED signage. The School Districts desire to install a LED message board is based on criteria altogether different than a for profit business and unique because public schools are created and chartered for the soul purpose and at the discretion of the tax payers within a city to serve the public interest ,2J ac A. That the information *pla is for community tax paye.ho own the charter to operate the schools. 3. To disseminate District activity & event information to citizens under the umbrella of a non - profit public agency, not a for profit business. C. The district would be receptive to limiting operating times of the LED board to certain hours each day. (Example 7AM to 9PM) D. The District is receptive to a limiting animation, flashing background displays which can be unattractive and focus on straight letter messaging. E. The District is receptive to undertaking discussions about the time intervals between messages, and the number of messages displayed each day. (TMC 19.08.030) Our desire would be to structure an agreement that meets our needs, while maintaining the spirit of the city's (TMC 19.08.030) animated code conditions, we are confident that we can work within your code with just a few minor but will defined clarifications. Thank You. i ,t. Campus Business Center W u - • -•.�� 33759 9th Ave. S Federal Way, WA 98003 King Co.: (253) 874 -0746 Pierce Co.: (253) 952 - 6559 Fax: (253) 838 - 1522 • Sign & Electrical Contractors Qty (1) Double sided cabinet sign with LED message center. (A) Internal lit aluminum cabinet with poly Garb faces and translucent vinyl graphics. Cabinet Painted black. (5) 2 led 19mm monochrome message centers (B) (C) bolt plate. Existing bolt plate may be used if existing pole is used. Bolt (C) plate painted Pantone Reflex Blue. (D) Steel pipe. Existing pipe may be used. Steel pipe painted Pantone - (0) Reflex Blue. (E) Aluminum access panel for service maintanace Vinyl Colors: Silver Gray 1 #•77 ice.; Blue PMS #2945 Black Revisions: Yes° No❑ Dusiynrc Jason Taylor S„lusmn, Bryon Tdlo Fi rJ: Il tustcrhiolt apiuoval Location: Foster Hiatt School Address: 4242 South 1441h St Tukwila, WA 98188 Data: 04/19/06 _ . (A) Client Approval: Date: GRADE SCALE: 3/8 " =1' JOB NAME: 2' 2 12' 2' (E) Colors shown in this representation are not necessarily the true colors used on the final product. This design presentation is the property of Sign -Tech Electric LLC. © Sign -Tech Electric 2003 All rights to use, alter, or reproduce are prohibited without written permission. TO: • • Parks and Recreation Department MEMORANDUM Bruce Fletcher, Director Mayor Mullet Community Affairs and Parks Committee FROM: c5 Rick Still, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation CC: Rhonda Berry, City Administrator Bruce Fletcher, Director of Parks and Recreation DATE: April 19, 2006 SUBJECT: Foster Golf Links — Irrigation System Filter Replacement Project BID AWARD BACKGROUND The Foster Golf Links irrigation system filters are budgeted and scheduled to be replaced in the 2006 Capital Improvement Project Budget. This project is greatly needed because the filters for the pump system — that runs all the irrigation for the golf course — are at a point to where they cannot be maintained anymore and have reached their life expectancy. The maintenance contractor will no longer maintain the filters because they need to be replaced. Six qualified contractors from the Small Works Roster were asked to bid on the project. A pre -bid meeting was conducted on April 6 and sealed bids were received and opened on April 18 Three contractors obtained the bid packets and one contractor submitted a bid on the project. Golf Pumping Services LLC has done work for the golf course in the past and staff is pleased to have them as the low bidder. The contractor will have 30 days to complete the project once the Notice to Proceed is given. Staff is confident that the contractor is very capable of performing the work in this time line. The scope of work will be done during the day which leaves the irrigation system operational during night. The 2006 CIP Budget for . this project is $35,000. The Base Bid results are $34,610 plus WSST in the amount of $3,045 for a total project of $37,655.68. The balance of the project costs ($2,655.68) plus a 5% contingency fund ($1,882.78) will be taken from the golf maintenance operating budget. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Community Affairs and Parks Committee forward the Foster Golf Links — Irrigation System Filter Replacement Project for BID AWARD to the Committee of the Whole. 610E12" LIQS ) None / }/ • • 2006 Small Works Roster Project BID OPENING 4 -18 -06 2:15 PM Foster Golf Links - Irrigation System Filter Replacement Project NO. 06- PK/GOLF -08 Cutter Construction 308 N 62nd St Seattle, WA 98103 Golf Pumping Services LLC 13531 124th Ct NE Kirkland, WA 98034 Utilities Service Co Inc 12608 E Marginal S Tukwila, WA 98168 Base Bid Bond Yes /No Rick S till, Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Addendum Apparent Low NONE Bidder Kr, gt e d None Vrb lc3 d Gl None TO: FROM: Steve Lancaster , DATE: April 19, 2006 SUBJECT: Amendment to Commercial Development Solutions contract ISSUE BACKGROUND ALTERNATIVES • 1 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Affairs and Parks Committee CITY OF TUKWILA Should our contract with Commercial Development Solutions for project management services related to the Tukwila South Project be extended? Commercial Development Solutions (Lisa Verner) has been providing project management services for the Tukwila South development proposal since July of 2004. The original term of the contract was one year, with an amount "not to exceed" $94,000. This contract was amended in July, 2005 to extend through November, 2005 with an additional allocation of $40,000, and again in November 2005 to extend through April 2006 with an additional allocation of $60,000. (The contract was amended a third time in early 2006 to expand the scope of services, but no time extension or additional budget was included in that amendment.) We anticipate needing Lisa's services for several more months, and are proposing a contract amendment. The proposed amendment would extend the current contract through December 31, 2006. The proposed additional compensation for this extension would be "not to exceed" $60,000, bringing the total for the contract up to $254,000. The proposed contract amendment would commit more money than was budgeted for 2006. 1. Extend the contract with Commercial Development Services through December 2006 in an additional amount not to exceed $60,000. Q: \PAA \TVS Segale \CDS_Extension4CAP.doc -sjl- Created on 04/19/2006 2:44:00 PM Page 1 of 2 RECOMMENDATION • • 2. Extend the contract for a shorter or longer period of time, and adjust the amount accordingly. 3. Allow the current contract to expire. Forward to Committee of the Whole with a recommendation to extend the contract with Commercial Development Services through December 2006 in an additional amount not to exceed $60,000, for a total contract amount not to exceed $254,000. Attachments: Draft Amendment #4 Contract for Annexation and Development Services, July 13, 2004 Amendment #1, July 22, 2005 Amendment #2, November 28, 2005 Amendment #3, February 7, 2006 Q:1PAA\TVS Sega le \CDS_Extension4CAP.doc -sjl- Created on 04/19/2006 2:44:00 PM Page 2 of 2 • • - DRAFT- City of Tukwila Contract for Services Amendment # 4 Contract No. Contract No. AG04 -063 dated July 13, 2004, as amended by Amendment #1 dated July 22, 2005, by Amendment #2 dated November 28, 2005, and by Amendment #3 dated . - , between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions is further amended as follows: Section 2, Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to add $60,000 to the amount of the contract. The total amount of funds to be paid shall not exceed $254,000. Section 4, Duration of Agreement, is amended to extend the contract to December 31, 2006. All other provisions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. DATED this day of , 2006. CONTRACTOR CITY OF TUKWILA Commercial Development Solutions Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED APPROVED AS TO FORM Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk City Attorney Q: \PAA \TVS Segale \CDS amend4.doc -sjl- Created on 04/19/2006 2:32:00 PM Page 1 of 1 • Contra. V`7 D ( CONTRACT FOR ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Tukwila, Washington, a noncharter optional municipal code city hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and Commercial Development Solutions, hereinafter referred to as "the Contractor," whose mailing address is PO Box 70372, Seattle, Washington 98127. WHEREAS, the City has determined the need to have certain services performed for its citizens but does not have the personnel or expertise to perform such services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Contractor perform such services pursuant to certain terms and conditions; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Schedule of Services to be Performed by Contractor. The Contractor shall perform those services described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. In performing such services, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the performance of such services and the handling of any funds used in connection therewith. The Contractor shall request and obtain prior written approval from the City if the scope or schedule is to be modified in any way. 2. Compensation and Method of Payment. The City shall pay the Contractor for services rendered according to the rate and method set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The total amount to be paid shall not exceed S94,000.00. Invoices listing work performed and hours worked shat } be submitted by Contractor to the City at the end of each calendar month. The City shall pay invoi s within 35 days of receipt. 3. Contractor Budget. The Contractor shall apply the funds received under this Agreement within the maximum limits set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor shall request prior approval from the City whenever the Contractor desires to amend its budget in any way. 4. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing July 13, 2004, and ending July 12, 2005 unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. 5. Independent Contractor. Contractor and City agree that Contractor is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither Contractor nor any employee of Contractor shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Contractor, or any employee of the Contractor. 6. Indemnification. The Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorney's fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any act, omission or failure of the Contractor, its officers, agents and employees, in performing the work required by this Agreement. With respect to the performance of this Agreement and as to claims against the City, its officers, agents and employees, the Contractor expressly waives its immunity under Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington, the Industrial Insurance Act, for injuries to its employees, and agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless provided for in this paragraph extends to any claim brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Contractor. This waiver is mutually negotiated by the parties. This paragraph shall not apply to any damage resulting from the sole negligence of the City, its agents and employees. To the extent any of the damages referenced by this paragraph were caused by or resulted from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents or employees, this obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless is valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of the Contractor, its officers, agents, and employees. 7. Record Keeping and Reporting. A. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial and programmatic records which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and services performed in the performance of this Agreement and other such records as may be deemed necessary by the City to ensure the performance of this Agreement. OR1 1NA-S B. se records shall be maintained for a perm. seven (7) years after termination hereof un ess permission to destroy them is granted by the office of the archivist in accordance with RCW Chapter 40.14 and by the City. 8. Audits and Inspections. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by law during the performance of this Agreement. 9. Termination. This Agreement may at any time be terminated by the City or Contractor giving to the other party thirty (30) days written notice of the City's or Contractor's intention to terminate the same. In the event of such termination, Contractor shall be entitled to compensation for services rendered through the date of termination. 10. Discrimination Prohibited. The Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee, applicant for employment, or any person seeking the services of the Contractor to be provided under this Agreement on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, age, national origin, marital status or presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap. 11. Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the services contemplated by this Agreement without the written consent of the City. 12. Entire Agreetitent. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement between the parties hereto and no other Agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement, shall be deemed to exist or bind any of the parties hereto. Either party may request changes in the agreement. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written amendments to this Agreement. 13. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Notices to the Contractor shall be sent to the address provided by the Contractor upon the signature line below. 14. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs of suit. DATED this °3 day of S , 20()t6 CITY OF TUKWILA Mayor, Steven M. Mullet ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: 4 .1 14- -4- " - E. Cantu, CMC, City Cleik APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney BY: i/f«:� CONTRACTOR: it n Q covvJ BY: ( aAWi--' Ti e: /1 Printed Name: L{S4t-5 �� ADDRESS: (ZS / fox 7637z (Cce - fetch • • EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES The following work will be performed under the direction and oversight of the City of Tukwila Director of Community Development (DCD): 1. Provide support to Project Team, consisting of senior City staff appointed by Mayor. • Schedule regular and special meetings of the Project Team. Determine need and arrange for attendance by persons outside the Project Team. • Develop and distribute meeting agendas in consultation with Director of Community Development (DCD) and the project proponent. • Prepare, distribute and present issue papers and recommendations. • Prepare and distribute meeting notes. • Implement direction provided by Project Team, in consultation with DCD. 2. Serve as City liaison to affected property owners and other government agencies on all matters involving annexation and development of the Tukwila South area. • Act as first point -of- contact between property owners and City staff. • Coordinate communication between City staff and property owners, consultants, government agencies and other interested parties. • Attend meetings involving property owners, consultants, agency representatives and others concerning master plan, environmental review, infrastructure planning and financing, annexation, and other matters involving annexation and development of the Tukwila South area. • Keep city officials informed and seek direction concerning interactions with affected property owners, consultants, agencies and other interested parties. • Identify issues needing resolution, provide necessary information and recommendations to decision - makers, and take appropriate actions to ensure decisions are timely made and implemented. 3. Manage selection and performance of consultants to ensure the development of objective, accurate, complete and well - written information for decision - makers. • Advise Director and Project Team concerning need for peer review of property owners' or consultants' submittals, and other City consultant needs related to the project. • Prepare scopes -of -work for proposed consultant contracts. • Manage consultant selection process in compliance with City consultant selection guidelines and procedures. • Monitor performance of City consultants, including review of, and recommendations concerning invoices and draft work products. Exhibit A: Contract for Annexation and Development Services Page 1 of 2 • • • Brief Project Team and other City officials, as appropriate, concerning consultant progress, findings and significance. 4. Coordinate City's reviews of proposals relating to land use policy, development regulations, infrastructure financing, environmental protection and related issues. • Review all submittals by property owners and their consultants. • Coordinate inter - departmental review of property -owner submittals and other project - related information and recommendations. • Coordinate City's project- related activities and decisions with other governmental agencies. • Identify and evaluate policy and implementation options. Draft issue papers, staff reports and recommendations for consideration by decision - makers. • Make presentations to decision - makers and other groups. Exhibit A: Contract for Annexation and Development Services Page 2 of 2 • • EXHIBIT B PAYMENT Payment for work completed and for services rendered under this contract shall be at the rate of $60.00 per hour exclusive of travel time. Exhibit B: Contract for Annexation and Development Services Page 1 of 1 • CONTRACTOR ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk City of Tukwila Contract for Services C I COACT N0. /1 (O `f - 0 ('j (7) Amendment # 1 Between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions. That portion of Contract No. AG04 -063 between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions, is amended as follows: Under Section 2., Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to add $40,000 to the original amount of the contract. The total amount of funds to be paid shall not exceed $134,000. Under Section 4., Duration of Agreement is extended to November 30, 2005. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. DATED this es,ri day of G - , 2005. OF TUKWILA Steven M. Mullet, Mayor 11 Contract No. AG04 -063 dated July 13, 2004, as amended by Amendment #1 dated July 22, 2005, between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions is further amended as follows: Section 2, Compensation and Method of Payment, is amended to add $60,000 to the amount of the contract. The total amount of funds to be paid shall not exceed $194,000. Section 4, Duration of Agreement, is amended to extend the contract to April 30, 2006. All other provisions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. DATED this day of It /, 2005. CONTRACTOR m cial Development Solutions Steven M. Mullet, Mayor ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED dam Co . e E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk City of Tukwila Contract for Services Amendment # 2 02 O� • Contract No. 4 6 2 41-616, 3 ( 6) CI Q: \PAA \TVS Segale \CDS amend2.doc -sjl -C ted on 10/19/2005 2:30 PM $ OF TUKWILA Page 1 of 1 DATED this 7 day o CONTRACTOR Commercial Development Solutions ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED E. Can u, CMC, City Clerk City of Tukwila Contract for Services Amendment # 3 Contract No. Contract No. AG04 -063 dated July 13, 2004, as amended by Amendment #1 dated July 22, 2005 and by Amendment #2 dated November 23, 2005, between the City of Tukwila and Commercial Development Solutions is further amended as follows: Section 1. Scope and Schedule of Services to be Performed by Contractor is hereby amended to read as follows: The Contractor shall perform those services described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. Secondarily, Consultant shall perform such additional services related to long-range ,planning and emergency preparedness as may be identified in writing by the - Director of Community Development and accepted by Contractor. In performing such services, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all Federal State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the performance of such . services and the handling of any funds used in connection therewith. The Contractor shall request and obtain prior written approval from the City if the scope or schedule is to be modified in any way. All other provisions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. 2006. CITY OF TUKWILA Steven M. Mullet, Mayor APPR City Att Q: \PAA \TVS Segale \CDS amend3.doc -sjl- Created on 01/31/2006 4:42 PM xi- o ep 3 fie /3 Page 1 of I _ • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Community Affairs and Parks Committee Members From: Steve Lancaster, DCD Director G. Date: April 19, 2006 Subject: Renewing the current moratorium on certain land divisions and development activities within the Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning area At this time, TUC Plan adoption is now anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2006. There is still a need for keeping the moratorium in place until the plan for the area is adopted. The proposed Ordinance is the same as that currently adopted. L \l Page I of 2 LYNN \I Lomsacres TOD'moratorium.lune 2UUn l'. \P4.25 Ob dm; Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Issue Ordinance 2107, establishing a six -month moratorium on the acceptance of certain land divisions and land use decisions within the transit - oriented development (TOD) planning area surrounding the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak station, will expire on June 5, 2006. Council must decide whether to renew the ordinance and hold a public hearing, or let the moratorium lapse. Background In September 2002, Council adopted an ordinance establishing a six -month moratorium on the acceptance of certain land divisions and land use decisions within the TOD planning area surrounding the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak station (see Figure 1). The moratorium was intended to preserve land available for development or redevelopment and restrict land uses that do not implement the vision for the area until land use and transportation plans and regulations supporting the TOD at the station are in place. In November 2005, Ordinance 2107 was adopted, renewing the moratorium. This Ordinance expires June 5, 2006. Council must decide whether to renew the ordinance and hold a public hearing, or let the moratorium lapse. To date, Council has renewed the moratorium seven times, modifying it to provide more flexibility in use of the parcels while the TUC plan was being developed. Discussion The Current Ordinance: • Prohibits the filing of all permits and approvals related to land divisions and such uses or activities as manufacturing, industrial & auto - oriented businesses. • Exempts the filing of and approvals related to the expansion of existing businesses on existing lots, sign permits and building permits for tenant improvements, and the extension of a current land use permit. • More uses are permitted in the TOD area than affected by the moratorium. The moratorium does not affect the filing of approvals related to all other uses currently allowed under TUC zoning, which support and implement the vision for the area, including those that are easily redevelopable such as auto sales lots, contractor or storage yards, or commercial parking. 1l4 18,20(16 hqn/) Cnuthrenter Rnnlevard_ Suite #100 • Tukwila. Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • The proposed Ordinance is the same as that currently adopted, including a modification that allows the City to preserve the land necessary for relocating the 100 foot -wide Union Pacific Railroad right - of -way to the area immediately adjacent to the western border of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad right -of -way. This modification provides additional restrictions to those already imposed by the moratorium, prohibiting any development activities on properties within this corridor, unless the property is to be developed under an approved developer agreement with the City. Staff has not received any requests to modify the ordinance since the last renewal in November 2005. Proposed Next Steps /5 8 1. Council holds a public hearing on the 9oratorium at their COW meeting on May 2006. 2. At the next regular meeting on Mayi22, 2006, Council has the following options: a. Renew the moratorium by adopting the proposed ordinance. The moratorium remains in effect for six months, at the end of which Council must hold another public hearing and renew, modify, or repeal the moratorium. b. Modify the proposed ordinance. It remains in effect for six months, at the end of which Council must hold another public hearing and either renew, modify, or repeal the moratorium. c. Take no action. When Ordinance No. 2107 expires on June 5, 2006, land divisions, development activities and land uses will occur in the area as allowed under the City's zoning. Planning and implementation of the TUC vision and other transportation improvements may be more difficult. LM Page 2 of 2 1 ' : I.YNN\I‘I_on_xres TOD n orawrium`..iune 2Ul)6 (:1 1'4_5 06.ddoc Conclusions • To date, Staff has not been made aware of any negative effects from the moratorium on plans to develop or redevelop properties in the TOD, most likely due to the limited scope of the moratorium. Should a specific project be proposed that falls outside the uses permitted under the moratorium, Staff will consider the appropriateness of the project and bring it forward to the Council for deliberation. • Planning Commission and City Council worksessions and public hearings on the draft Tukwila Urban Center Plan will begin this summer. Plan adoption is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2006. However, there is still a need for keeping the moratorium in place until that time. Recommendations The CAP Committee recommends adopting the proposed ordinance, and forwards it on to the COW for a public hearing at their May 15, 2006 meeting. 04/1S0'2000 • • CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, RENEWING A SIX - MONTH MORATORIUM ON ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATIONS FOR CERTAIN LAND DIVISIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND LAND USES WITHIN THE AREA DESIGNATED FOR TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AROUND THE TEMPORARY COMMUTER RAIL/AMTRAK STATION AT LONGACRES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, the City recognized the unique opportunity to promote a more compact, mixed use, pedestrian supportive pattern of development that makes effective use of its proximity and accessibility to the Sounder commuter rail and Amtrak station in Tukwila, and includes a mix of retail, service, office and residential uses; and WHEREAS, a more intensive pattern of transit - oriented development (TOD) would assist the City with the redevelopment of the Tukwila Urban Center, one of thirteen designated urban centers within King County, and provide workers with commercial, public and recreational services close to where they live or work; and WHEREAS, a more intensive pattern of TOD would benefit the region by assisting in achieving Growth Management Act requirements and increasing local and regional transit ridership; and WHEREAS, in August, 2001, the City held a workshop, inviting other key stakeholders to explore the possibilities for a TOD in the Longacres area; and WHEREAS, the workshop resulted in strong support for the project and a "vision" for land use and transportation in the Longacres TOD area; and WHEREAS, to implement this vision, the City applied for and was awarded a $1.5 million grant by the Federal Highways Administration to prepare a master plan for the Longacres area, identifying land use, urban design and transportation/circulation objectives, as well as to prepare implementing ordinances and design guidelines, complete environmental review of the plan I 'Z • • and designate it as a planned action, and integrate the design of the permanent commuter rail /Amtrak station; and WHEREAS, while the City anticipates the TOD master plan project to be completed by the end of 2006, some issues need to be addressed immediately in order for the TOD project to be successful; and WHEREAS, the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) zoning district allows for a variety of high- intensity regional uses in the TOD planning area, including light industry and warehousing, some of which may not be of appropriate type, density or character to support the intent of a TOD; and WHEREAS, the Longacres site is considered one of the region's key opportunities for TOD, primarily due to the large amount of vacant and redevelopable land surrounding the station; and WHEREAS, any significant amount of new development occurring prior to the establishment of a desired pattern of uses in the TOD master plan could jeopardize the City's ability to implement the TOD plan; and WHEREAS, the City's Municipal Code allows for the division of land and adjustment of boundary lines that, if allowed to occur in the TOD planning area, would make future land assemblage for a TOD project difficult and costly, and threaten the successful implementation of the TOD master plan; and WHEREAS, within the TOD planning area, the City desires to take immediate steps to preserve the land available for development or redevelopment and restrict land uses that do not implement the vision for the area until the TOD at Longacres master plan and environmental review are completed, certain implementing zoning regulations are adopted by the City, and other related regional transportation infrastructure issues are decided; and WHEREAS, the City also desires to ensure public input on these issues; and WHEREAS, the moratorium will expire on J- anuary 13. 2006- ,line 5. 2006and the TOD planning process is not yet completed; and WHEREAS, a public hearing on this proposed ordinance was held on- Ntwet 3er 28.2 05 May 15. 2006; and WHEREAS, the City desired to provide for an exemption to the moratorium for residential mixed -use TOD projects within one - quarter mile of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station property, as amended in Ordinance 2085; and • • WHEREAS, within the designated TOD planning area, the City desires to preserve the land necessary for relocating the 100 foot wide Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way to the area immediately adjacent to the west side of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad 100 foot right -of -way by prohibiting further development within this corridor, since this relocation is integral to the successful development of a TOD; WHEREAS, the City desires to preserve the status quo for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of City residents, as it relates to development in Tukwila, until these matters are more fully considered and, therefore, has determined that an emergency exists; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings of Fact and Emergency Declared. The "Whereas" clauses, above, are hereby adopted by reference as the City Council's findings of fact as if fully set forth herein. Furthermore, the City Council hereby declares an emergency necessary for the protection of the public health and safety. Section 2. Moratorium Area Established. For the purposes of this ordinance, "the TOD planning area" is identified in Figure 1. This area is bounded by I -405 on the north, Tukwila city limits on the east, the southern boundary of parcel number 2523049006 on the south, and West Valley Highway on the west. Section 3. Moratorium on Activities. A moratorium established by Ordinance No. 2081 is hereby renewed, regarding the filing of permits and approvals within the TOD planning area relating to: A. Land divisions: This includes all permits and approvals related to subdivisions, short subdivisions, boundary line adjustments, and lot consolidations. B. Development Activities and Land Uses: This includes all applications and approvals for any and all: 1. rezones 2. conditional use permits 3. unclassified use permits 4. variances 5. binding site plans 6. required environmental review 7. building permits 8. land altering permits; Relating to the following activities and uses: i9 ao • • a. Amusement parks b. Automobile, recreational vehicles or travel trailer sales rooms. No dismantling of cars or travel trailers nor sale of used parts allowed. c. Automotive services d. Cemeteries and crematories e. Commercial laundries f. Drive -in theaters g. Drive - through restaurants h. Electrical substations - distribution i. Heavy equipment repair and salvage j. Internet data/telecommunication centers k. Manufacturing, processing and/or packaging of foods, including but not limited to, baked goods, beverages (except fermenting and distilling), candy, canned or preserved foods, dairy products and byproducts, frozen foods, instant foods and meats (no slaughtering) 1. Manufacturing, processing and/or packaging pharmaceuticals and related products, such as cosmetics and drugs m. Manufacturing, processing, and/or packaging previously prepared materials including, but not limited to, bags, brooms, brushes, canvas, clay, clothing, fur, furniture, glass, ink, paint, paper, plastics, rubber, tile, and wood n. Manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging and/or repairing electronic, mechanical or precision instruments such as medical and dental equipment, photographic goods, measurement and control devices, and recording equipment. o. Manufacturing, processing and/or assembling previously prepared metals including, but not limited to, stamping, dyeing, shearing or punching of metal, engraving, galvanizing and hand - forging. p. Motels q. Recreation facilities (commercial - indoor), including bowling alleys, skating rinks, shooting ranges r. Warehouse storage and/or wholesale distribution facilities Sign permits, building permits for tenant improvements, the extension of current land use permits, and expansion of existing businesses on existing lots are exempt from this ordinance. Section 4. Moratorium on Development Adjacent to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad right - of - way. In addition to the provisions of Section 3 above, any permitted or conditional uses allowed within the TUC district under TMC Chapt. 18.28 are prohibited on properties located within 100 feet of the BNSF Railroad right -of -way between I -405 and Longacres Way, unless the property is to be developed under an approved developer agreement with the City. Section 5. Effective Period of Moratorium. The moratorium established by this ordinance shall become effective as set forth in Section 9 below, and shall continue in • • effect for six months thereafter unless repealed, renewed or modified by the City Council after a subsequent public hearing and entry of findings of fact. Section 6. Work Program. The Mayor is authorized to allocate the necessary resources to prepare a work program to address the land use and transportation planning issues identified in this ordinance and the City shall implement such a work program. Section 7. Exemption. Residential mixed -use transit - oriented development projects within one - quarter mile of the Sounder Commuter Rail/Amtrak Station property are specifically exempted from this moratorium except for property located within 100 feet of the Burlington Northern Railroad right -of -way as set forth in Section 4. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or circumstance, be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid for any reason, or should any portion of this ordinance be pre - empted by state or federal law or regulation, such decision or preemption shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other persons or circumstances. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance, or a summary thereof, shall be published in the official newspaper of the City. As set forth in Section 1, this public emergency ordinance -- necessary for the protection of the public health, public safety, public property or the public peace -- shall be effective immediately upon its adoption, pursuant to RCW 35A.12.130. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this _ day of , 2006 -5. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Office of the City Attorney Steven M. Mullet, Mayor TO: Mayor Mullet FROM: Steve Lancaster DATE: April 20, 2006 SUBJECT: Foster High School Sign proposal ISSUE BACKGROUND • • DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF TUKWILA MEMORANDUM Representatives of the Tukwila School District have contacted the City regarding their desire to erect an electronic message center sign at Foster High School (see attached memo from Bill Van De Bogert dated April 20, 2006). The proposed sign would likely have display capabilities that exceed the allowances of the Tukwila Sign Code, and the School District representatives have indicated their desire to use such capabilities. The District intends to request an amendment to the Sign Code to allow this. District Athletic Director Scott Erdahl and Foster High School Principal Willie Fisher are scheduled to attend the April 25 Community Affairs and Parks Committee (CAP) meeting to present their proposal. The proposed sign would be pole- mounted, twelve feet high and would measure 9'X4' or smaller on each of two faces (see attached example). The sign's height, size and location would have to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. At issue is the lower section of the sign which consists of an electronic message center capable of displaying two or three lines of text. The sign would be capable of scrolling, streaming and flashing text and simple graphics. The Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC 19.28.010(3)) prohibits "animated signs." Animated signs are defined as follows: "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movetent or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or temperature shall not be construed to be animated. (TMC 19.08.030) The proposed Foster High School sign would be considered an "animated sign" if operated in a manner that causes the electronic message to flash, blink, scroll or otherwise portray movement, Q: \COUNCIL \Foster Mess ate Center.doc 1 of 2 SjI Created on 04/20 /2006 9:27:58 AM • • or if any message other than time /date /temperature changes more than once every 24 hours. Such signs are expressly prohibited by (TMC 19.28.010(3)). ALTERNATIVES 1. No Action. The City Council could choose to take no action, in which case the proposed sign, if erected, would be limited to no more than one message change per day. No flashing, blinking, scrolling or other message movement would be allowed. Staff understands that Foster High School would not erect the proposed sign under these circumstances. 2. Modify definition of "animated sign." The definition could be modified to allow changing messages more frequently than once every 24 hours. The City Council could also consider relaxing restrictions on flashing, scrolling or other effects. 3. Exemption for community event announcements. The sign code currently provides an exemption for "changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or temperature." An additional exemption could be allowed for the display of community event announcements. This exemption could be applied to all signs, or could be limited to specific land uses (public schools and public recreation facilities, for example). Any such exemption should be applied cautiously, and should provide the minimum variation from the basic standards as possible. 4. Exempt electronic message centers. Our current definition of "animated sign" captures a range of technologies from signs that physically move, to electronic message centers (such as the proposed Foster sign) to near -video quality displays. The City could instead distinguish among the various technologies, for example allowing electronic message centers but prohibiting near - video quality displays. 5. Eliminate prohibition of animated signs. The City Council could eliminate the prohibition of animated signs altogether. CONCLUSION Staff believes that any of these except the "No Action" alternative could be accomplished in a way that meets Foster High School's stated objectives. However, the implications of alternatives 4 and 5 are rather significant, and would require a much more detailed analysis than would alternatives 2 and 3. Alternative 3 is the most limited change that [night accomplish the School District's request, but would need to provide as small a difference from basic sign code standards as possible. The Committee should be aware that Westfield Shoppingtowne Southcenter may also request amendments to the sign code relating to electronic signs and possibly other issues later this year. RECOMMENDATION If the Committee is interested in considering the School District's request, staff recommends the issue be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. Q: \COUNCIL \Fester Message Centcr.doc 2 of 2 SjI Created m1)4/2(1/20(16 9:27:5 AM To: Scott, Brandon From: Bill V. Re: Questions to consider Thank you so much for helping us through this process. I've identified a couple of questions and included a sample to help us further refine the perimeters. I put them in bold for your benefit. If you could think about a response as we continue to move closer to approval. Thanks 1) The sign would be limited not to change message more frequently than once every 10 seconds. We have an interest around shortening the seconds for each message to better display multiple line messages, i.e. when a message takes two frames. For instance: Message 1. First frame "5 seconds" Message 2. Second frame "5 seconds" School registration at Showalter August 12th -15th Bring your Childs student and Immunization records We request shorter times for displaying only multiple frame messages. That maybe the only alteration at this point. 2) The size of the sign would be based on the permitted size sign under the sign code. I believe the , proposed sign does meet the City's size requirements. Please confirm that the size meets this requirement as early as possible for the vendor. Does TMC identify the logo part of signs as inclusive or exclusive of the message part of the sign? Our sign is 4' by 8', of which the top 2' by 8' is school logo and bottom 2' by 8' is LED display. Can you confirm that it meets the size code? 3) The sign would not be permitted flash, scroll, move, have animation, etc. Please detail the definition of "move" to help us understand as it relates to our request identified in number one above. These are the basic ideas I was considering. Is there anything else the district would like the City to consider allowing the sign to do? The items below may serve a valuable interest as criteria that distinguish the schools from other non - profits. Criteria that maybe material to the conversation. 4) That the information displayed is for community tax payers who own the charter to operate the schools as a non - profit entity. 5) To disseminate District activity & event information to citizens under the umbrella of a non - profit public agency. e • A church, conditional use, or public facility shall be permitted at least one wall sign and one freestanding sign or two wall signs. No wall may have more than one wall sign. One additional sign shall be allowed for each additional street frontage. Total area of the sign or signs for the use shall not exceed 50 square feet per sign; maximum height above ground, when in the setback area, shall not exceed 16 feet minimum setback shall be eight feet; and the base of the sign shall be located in a landscaped area. Bulletin boards and readerboards are considered signs. Illuminated signs shall use indirect, concealed sources, or backlighted letters on an opaque background. Temp Sips Signs in Commeraalllndus1Aal tones Perm. Sips Freestanding Wall Churches and CUPs that are not public fadlhies Sign Code Signs io Tuila Signs in Re sidental boas Prohibited Sips Public Facilities Exempted Signs 4 RESEARCH REVIEW OF POTENTIAL SAFETY EFFECTS OF ELECTRONIC BILLBOARDS ON DRIVER ATTENTION AND DISTRACTION FINAL REPORT September 11, 2001 Submitted to: Office of Real Estate Services and Safety Core Business Unit Federal Highway Administration From: Human Centered Systems Team Office of Safety Research and Development Federal Highway Administration 1. Report No. 2. Govemment Accession No. 3. Recipients Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction. 5. Report Date 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) J. Farbry, K. Wochinger, T. Shafer, N. Owens, and A. Nedzesky 8. Performing Organization Report No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Science Applications International Corporation 8301 Greensboro Drive McLean, VA 22102 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Federal Highway Administration Office of Real Estate Safety Core Business Unit 400 7' Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes COTR: Thomas Granda, HRDS and Lannie Graham HEPR. 16. Abstract This report is a research review of potential safety implications of electronic billboards (EBBs) on driving safety. The review covers the interval from a similar review published in 1980 to the present. The present review focuses on the safety aspects of EBBs and does not examine aesthetic issues. Included are a review of research on driver performance in the presence of EBBs and contacts with federal and state officials to describe state regulatory practices concerning EBBs. An account of tri- vision signs is a part of the state review. Knowledge gaps are identified based on the literature review and these gaps support the development of a set of research questions and related research findings. Research questions are divided into roadway characteristics such as curves, interchanges, and work zones; EBB characteristics such as exposure time, motion and legibility; and driver characteristics such as familiarity and age. Related research findings on the legibility of Changeable Message Signs (CMSs) are also included. 17. Key Word Electronic Billboard, Tri- vision, Driving Safety, Driver Distraction, Advertising, Changeable Message Sign, Conspicuity, Legibility. 18. Distribution Statement 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 43 22. Price Form DOT F 1700.7 (8 -72) Reproduction of completed page authorized 11 Technical Report Documentation Page l Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Background and Objectives 3 1.2 Structure of the Report 3 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2.1 Types of Electronic Billboards 4 2.2 State Regulations and Policies on Electronic Billboards 5 2.2.1 Introduction 5 2.2.2 Sources of Information 5 2.2.3 State Regulations and Practices 6 2.2.4 National Alliance of Highway Beautification Agencies 7 2.2.5 State Outdoor Advertising Regulations 8 2.2.6 Concerns about Electronic Billboards 8 2.3 Reports on Billboards and Safety 8 2.3.1 The Wachtel and Netherton Report 8 2.3.2 Wisconsin DOT Report 9 2.3.3 The Curriden Article 10 2.4 Potential Safety Factors 10 2.4.1 Distraction 10 2.4.2 Conspicuity of Displays 11 2.4.3 Legibility 13 2.5 The Driver 15 2.5.1 Driver Age 15 2.5.2 Driver Familiarity with Route 17 2.6 Measures of Effectiveness 17 2.6.1 Surrogates 17 2.6.2 Current Measurement of Distraction 18 3 SYNTHESIS 20 4 RESEARCH NEEDS 21 4.1 Roadway Characteristics 21 4.2 EBB and Tri- vision Sign Characteristics 23 4.3 Research Findings in Legibility 25 4.4 Driver Characteristics 28 4.5 Other Potential Driver Distractions 29 4.6 Future Research. 29 4.7 Research Methods 30 5 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 31 REFERENCES 41 iv i Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Timing Boundaries of Several Tri- Vision Billboard Policies 7 Table 2. Recommended Minimum Luminance Values (cd/m2) for CMS Visibility 26 1 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Advances in display technology and decreases in cost have created interest to expand the deployment of high resolution and dynamic imaging. The introduction of such technology to billboards, where static displays of advertising have been the standard, raises questions on the effects that electronic billboards (EBBs) may have on drivers' attention. The Office of Real Estate Services and the Safety Core Business Unit in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requested the FHWA Office of Safety, Research and Development to review literature related to the safety implications of EBBs, present findings, and recommend a research plan to address knowledge gaps. This project follows earlier work sponsored by the FHWA in 1980 and compliments driver distraction studies relative to in- vehicle displays currently underway. Based on conversations with government staff and examination of state regulations, the literature review summarized state billboard regulations and policies relevant to EBBs and tri- vision signs. The review then encompassed billboard- related crash analyses and potential safety factors such as distraction, conspicuity, and legibility. Due to the limited amount of research regarding external distraction in drivers, intemal distractions, such as in- vehicle information systems and cellular telephones, were used as surrogates when investigating how potential distractions affect the driver. As the literature review identified and summarized potential safety effects of EBBs and tri vision signs, many questions became evident. The synthesis section organized these questions into knowledge gaps. The identified knowledge gaps have been categorized into the areas of roadway geometry characteristics, EBB and tri- vision sign characteristics, and driver characteristics. Since this effort was purely a review of existing literature, no formal research was completed; the purpose of the remainder of the research review was to build upon the identified knowledge gaps. Each of the gaps was analyzed and preliminary research plans were proposed. Included in each plan are associated goals and proposed research questions. When possible, relevant research findings in which the research questions were based upon were identified. Roadway characteristics that were recognized for future research in the knowledge gap section include horizontal and vertical curves, intersections, work zones, and EBB billboard spacing. EBBs and tri- vision sign characteristics and their proposed research questions are related to an EBB's message content and comprehensibility, exposure time, motion, and sign maintenance. Finally, research questions related to driver characteristics are directed to age and route familiarity. 2 Research Review of Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background and Objectives Advances in outdoor display technology, and decreases in cost, support an interest in expanding deployment of high resolution and dynamic imaging in outdoor advertising. This raises questions on the effects that electronic billboards (EBBs) and other dynamic signs such as tri- vision signs may have on driver distraction. The purpose of this report is to present a review of the literature on the safety implications of electronic billboards, to identify knowledge gaps in the findings of the review, and to develop a research plan to address the knowledge gaps. The Office of Real Estate Services (ORES) and the Safety Core Business Unit in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requested the FHWA Office of Safety, Research and Development to review literature related to safety implications of EBBs, present findings, and recommend a research plan to address knowledge gaps. The scope of this review was limited to safety issues. This project follows an earlier work sponsored by the FHWA in 1980 and complements studies of in- vehicle driver distraction currently underway. The general approach in the present review was to identify information about potential safety implications of EBBS. Factual data regarding billboard safety were sought through a review of existing research literature and information obtained from government staff. Because driver distraction is of interest in other areas of research, such as cellular telephone use and in- vehicle visual information equipment, the present report examines these areas for possible cross - fertilization results. The report concludes with a set of research questions and research findings that are directed to the safe design of dynamic billboards. 1.2 Structure of the Report The Literature Review in Section 2 defines EBBs and tri-vision signs, provides a survey of state practices, and reviews research on EBBs and related distraction research. The Synthesis in Section 3 provides a list of knowledge gaps that were identified in the literature review. Section 4 proposes research in the format of research questions and presents related research findings that are directed to understanding driver behavior in the presence of EBBs and tri-vision signs. The report also contains an annotated bibliography and appendices. 3 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 2 LITERATURE REVIEW The literature review researched two types of information to understand the safety implications of electronic billboards. One research effort examined current state practices in the regulation of EBBs to determine, for example, the features of those displays at which the regulation is directed and the consistency of regulation among the states. The other type of information was derived mostly from research studies that had the objective of understanding driver behavior in the presence of electronic billboards and/or tri-vision signs. Information of the latter type can provide a source for informed state planning. The review begins with a description of electronic billboards, tri-vision signs, and a discussion of the relationship of these two display types to changeable message signs used for transmitting roadway status information. The next section describes the results of the review of current state practices on billboard regulation and this is followed by the review of research studies. 2.1 Types of Electronic Billboards Technology has advanced sufficiently for billboards to provide dynamic and realistic views much like color television. The advanced EBB has the capability to present multiple views and objects that have realistic motion. In contrast, tri-vision signs provide one of three views with rotating cylinders and generate mechanical motion or movement. Since both the EBB and tri vision sign incorporate components that display motion, some of the issues associated with EBBs are also associated with tri- vision signs. These two types will be compared in functional terms. For the purpose of the present report, the definition of an EBB is a programmable display that has the capability to present a large amount of text and/or symbolic imagery. Some EBBs present images in realistic motion and in a large variety of colors. The tri-vision sign is defined as a display device capable of presenting three separate images sequentially by rotating triangular cylinders. Appendix A shows examples of EBBS and a tri-vision sign. The EBB consists of several visual characteristics. EBBs present high- resolution color images, complex visual arrangements, rich variation in color, and a vast amount of images. Operational characteristics include electric power and remote control though a computer terminal. The EBB screen display elements are typically arranged in a matrix. The shape of the EBB is usually rectangular, but irregular shapes are possible. An example is the EBB on the NASDAQ Marketsite's Tower in New York City's Times Square. This EEB wraps around the corner of the building.' The NASDAQ video screen is eight stories high and covers 10,736 square ft with light- emitting diodes (LEDs). The EBB can vary in complexity. Whereas some EBBs display motion, fine detail, and a rich variety of color, other EBBs provide a simpler image. This image is often composed of a short sequence of words in which each letter is defined by a small number of matrix elements such as a 4x6 matrix or a 5x7 matrix. The elements are typically light emitting (i e , LEDs or incandescent) and presented against a dark background. This simpler version of the EBB shares features of the display used by governmental agencies for presenting information to drivers. This display is referred to as a changeable message sign (CMS) in this paper. The CMS typically employs a matrix technology to provide variable messages displays. Other equivalent terms currently used for this sign are variable message sign (VMS) and, to a lesser extent, dynamic message sign (DMS). The permanent CMS is found mounted above the roadway whereas a portable CMS is usually mobile and is located on the shoulder of the roadway. 4 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Whereas the EBB can display a vast number of images, the tri- vision sign is more limited. The typical tri- vision sign is composed of a series of vertical or horizontal cylinders each of which has a triangular cross section. Each partial rotation of the group of triangular cylinders produces a different image. A single tri- vision sign typically displays, at any given time, one of three images. Although the final composite image does not provide motion, there is still movement due to the transition from one image to another as the cylinders rotate. This movement can act as an attention- getting feature that attracts the driver's attention to the display. One such feature present during the rotation is the partial viewing of two images in transition, where one image advances as the other retreats. Another feature is the change in reflective qualities among the different sides of the triangular cylinders during the transition. 2.2 State Regulations and Policies on Electronic Billboards 2.2.1 Introduction This section of the literature review pertains to the regulation of EBBs across the United States. A review of existing states' regulations and policies is presented first since it is believed that this will provide the reader with an understanding of how EBBs fit into various states' outdoor advertising policies Each state's regulations generally derive from the 1965 Highway Beautification Act (HBA). A detailed history and overview of the federal outdoor advertising control program, which includes the HBA, can be found on the FHWA's ORES web site: http: / /www.fhwa .dot.gov /realestate /oacprog.htm. A review of state outdoor advertising regulations revealed that common billboard guidelines governing EBBs and tri- vision signs do not exist. While states generally have consistent regulations governing static billboards, regulations covering EBBs and tri- vision signs vary widely. Implementation practices differ significantly from state to state. A broad spectrum of regulations exists, ranging from lenient control to the prohibition of outdoor advertising. 2.2.2 Sources of Information Federal and state Department of Transportation (DOT) personnel provided information regarding state regulations and policies. The information pertained to whether states regulate EBBs, and if so, in what manner. The sources of information are described briefly as follows: • State Outdoor Advertising Regulations. Efforts were made to obtain the most current billboard regulations nationwide. These regulations were collected from various sources, such as the state DOT directly, a state's website, or from the National Alliance of Highway Beautification Agencies' (NAHBA) website. Overall, regulations were obtained from 44 states. ■ Personal Communication. In addition to obtaining state documents, the researchers contacted states and FHWA division offices. Since a supporting contractor was to be directly contacting state DOTs, an introductory e-mail message was sent from FHWA Headquarters to each Division Office to notify the FHWA Division Office and the state DOTs of the contractor's role. The FHWA contractor contacted state personnel who were knowledgeable of their state's billboard regulations. The telephone calls were of an unstructured nature, and their purpose was to determine if local constituents had submitted comments or complaints about EBBs, and if research had been conducted on EBBs in the state. 5 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction FHWA Division Offices. Nine FHWA Division Offices were contacted. FHWA's ORES recommended some of the selected Division Offices and others were selected randomly. State DOTs. Some state DOT personnel were contacted at the suggestion of their local FHWA Division Office while other states were selected randomly. Ten state DOTs were contacted by telephone. National Alliance of Highway Beautification Agencies (NAHBA). In the early 1990s, a group of individuals responsible for directing or managing their state's outdoor advertising program formed the NAHBA. The Alliance meets regularly to discuss new developments in technology, upcoming legislation, and ways to improve or stream -line regulation of outdoor advertising, junkyards, landscaping, and visitor centers. Additionally, NAHBA maintains a website that contains outdoor advertising regulations of numerous states and the federal government. A NAHBA meeting was held in Washington, D.C., in late January 2001. Two members of the research team and their FHWA contracting officer technical representative met with NAHBA members after the formal meeting had ended. Representatives of Florida, Kentucky, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Utah were present. The meeting served a purpose similar to the telephone calls, except that it allowed a more interactive conversation in more detail. NAHBA provided the responses from an informal email questionnaire pertaining to EBBs and a tri vision sign survey to the research team. These are presented in a subsequent section of this report. 2.2.3 State Regulations and Practices In a July 1996 memorandum to FHWA Regional Administrators, the ORES provided additional interpretation of advertising technology to the individual states regarding of premise changeable message signs. An ofd premise sign is a sign that disseminates information that does not directly relate to the use of the property on which the sign is located. ( "Changeable message signs are acceptable for off-premise signs regardless of the type of technology used, if the interpretation of the State/Federal agreement allows such signs," page 1, paragraph 2, sentence 4 of the memorandum). In a July 1998 memorandum, the ORES reaffirmed their policy that off-premise signs using animated or scrolling displays that are dependent on flashing, intermittent, or moving lights were not conforming signs This decision was made after careful review of a videotape showing the full- motion EBB erected in Scottsbluff, Nebraska. It was concluded that such signs raise "significant highway safety questions because of the potential to be extremely bright, rapidly changing, and distracting to motorists," (page 1, paragraph 4, sentence 1 of the memorandum). A majority of states have a policy regarding the lighting of billboards, and through this policy, states regulate EBBs. While common themes are present in most lighting regulations, each state's laws have unique wording. As an example, the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department's Outdoor Advertising Policy, Regulations for Control of Outdoor Advertising on Arkansas Highways, as authorized by Arkansas Act 640 of 1967 and Highway Commission Minute Order No. 77 -6, section III, subsection D, Lighting states: Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction A. Lighting Signs may be illuminated, subject to the following restrictions: 1. Signs, which contain, include, or are illuminated by any flashing, intermittent, or moving light or lights are prohibited, except those giving public service information such as time, date, temperature, weather, or similar information. 2. Signs which are not effectively shielded as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion of the traveled ways of the Interstate or Primary highways and which are of such intensity or brilliance as to cause glare or to impair the vision of the driver of any motor vehicle, or which otherwise interferes with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle are prohibited. 3. No sign shall be so illuminated that it interferes with the effectiveness of, or obscures an official traffic sign, device, or signal. 2.2.4 National Alliance of Highway Beautification Agencies Tri- vision Sign Survey. A 1999 survey sponsored by and presented at the annual NAHBA conference reviewed the tri- vision sign advertising regulations of every state and Washington, DC. The following results show that a majority of states are addressing current advertising technologies in their outdoor advertising regulations. At the time of the survey: • Nine states had specific regulations governing signs, • Nine states had regulations on tri-vision signs that were either being drafted or in pending legislation, • Fifteen states had regulations regarding moving parts and/or lights, • Nine state had no regulations on tri-vision sign, and • Six states as well as Washington, DC, prohibited tri-vision signs. Table 1 provides a summary of tri- vision sign exposure dwell times and transition times that were presented in the 1999 NAHBA survey. Table 1. Timing Boundaries of Several Tri- Vision Sign Policies. Average . Maximum a�a Minimum" asp el#5 n � Ra' - e. 7.32 10 4 Minimum Exposure Dwell Time (sec) I Maximum Transition Twirl Time (sec) 2 2.16 4 1 Source: NAHBA 1999 Conference. I Minimum Exposure Dwell Time: For billboards that change messages, (e.g., tri- vision sign or CMSs), the exposure time can be defined as the minimum amount of time, in seconds, that a message must be shown. Some minimum exposure times have been derived from analytical calculations (based on speed limit and the number of faces of a billboard that can be seen) while other minimum exposure times have come in the form of recommendations from outdoor advertising suppliers or have been based upon engineering judgment. 1 Maximum Transition Twirl Time: The transition time is the amount of time, in seconds, that is required for a billboard (such as and EBB or tri- vision sign) to automatically change messages. Many states have set a maximum transition time for this change. The maximum was originally determined by taking into account the mechanical constraints of older tri- vision signs and attempting to limit the amount of visual distraction caused by a sign's transition. Due to advances in technology, transitions executed by a full- motion video billboard are virtually instantaneous. Electronic Sign Data. In early February 2001, NAHBA asked its membership to answer four questions regarding EBBs. One question relevant to this research is: "Do you have a definition 7 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction of an electronic sign?" Of the 20 responses that were received, five states had a definition, 14 did not have a definition, and one state was in the process of rewriting its definition. 2.2.5 State Outdoor Advertising Regulations A review of statutes was conducted to identify state prohibitions on specific characteristics of signs. This review is presented in Appendices B and C. The results indicate, in part, that of 42 states: • Thirty-six states had prohibitions on signs with red, flashing, intermittent, or moving lights, ■ Twenty -nine states prohibited signs that were so illuminated as to obscure or interfere with traffic control devices, and • Twenty-nine states prohibited signs located on interstate or primary highway outside of the zoning authority of incorporated cities within 500 ft of an interchange or intersection at grade or safety roadside area. Additional information on other sign characteristics includes insufficient shielding of light, timing limits, and sign location relative to traffic control devices. 2.2.6 Concerns about Electronic Billboards Numerous states have attempted to identify a relationship between EBBs and safety by using traffic conditions as a surrogate measure. The states of Nevada, Utah, Texas, New York, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts reported no evidence of increased traffic safety problems after the installation of electronic information displays in their city centers and along their highways. Additionally, five state DOT personnel were asked if a crash relationship with EBBs existed in their states; the responses were that a relationship between crashes and EBBs was not identifiable. However, one belief is that EBBs are typically on congested roadways where drivers have time to look at the sign, so it is difficult to determine if the EBBs cause crashes, let alone traffic congestion. 2.3 Reports on Billboards and Safety Determining the effect of roadway commercial advertising billboards on safety is a difficult endeavor for several theoretical and methodological reasons. First, crash frequency is often used as a measure of safety, yet crashes occur relatively infrequently, so changes in frequency may be subtle and are not easily attributed to particular factors. In addition, distraction effects may interact with other factors, such as weather. Furthermore, crash reporting procedures differ across jurisdictions and may not refer to billboard distraction as a factor in the crash. Additionally, drivers may be unlikely to identify distraction as the cause of a crash for liability reasons. Regardless of these difficulties, researchers have examined the effects of billboards on safety. The results are mixed and inconclusive, as shown below. 2.3.1 The Wachtel and Netherton Report The safety and aesthetics of commercial electronic variable message signing were reviewed by the FHWA in 1980 and are summarized below. Part of that effort included a review of published studies on the safety effect of roadside advertising signs, including several field and 8 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction laboratory studies from 1951 to 1978 on non - electronic advertising billboards, and one analysis in 1976 of an electronic advertising sign in Boston. The Minnesota Department of Highways concluded from a field study in 1951 that an increase in commercial billboards would result in an increased crash rate. A 1951 field study conducted by Iowa State College concluded that more crashes caused by driver inattention occurred on road segments that contained billboards. The Michigan State Highway Department in 1952 found that advertising signs did not correlate with the roadway's crash experience, except for illuminated (neon) signs, which did correlate with an increased crash rate. A 1961 study of California Route 40 concluded that road segments with billboards experienced significantly more crashes than segments without billboards. A 1967 field study compared the crash history of three locations in Chicago before and after the installation of three illuminated, commercial changeable message signs. Crash rates did not change at two of the sign locations, but the third sign location showed an increase of crashes. The third sign had alternating lights, showed several advertising messages, and was illuminated by bright white lights. The rapid increase in crashes led state highway officials to request that blue lights replace the white lights (3) The Tele -Spot sign in Boston was an off - premise commercial electronic sign. The sign was visible from the Central Artery in the midst of complex on- and off-ramps, regulatory signs, and guide signing. The Massachusetts Outdoor Advertising Board conducted an analysis of traffic crashes three years before and two and a quarter years after sign installation. The analysis showed an overall reduction in the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and crashes along the expressway, but on the areas of the expressway from where the Tele -Spot was visible, the crash reduction was 10 percent less than the overall reduction. The Board regarded the 10- percent difference as an indication that the Tele- Spot sin was a distraction and a safety risk, and consequently revoked the license for the sign.° 2.3.2 Wisconsin DOT Report The Wisconsin DOT examined the crash rates on Interstate 94 eastbound and westbound adjacent to the Milwaukee County Stadium The analysis compared the crash rates three years before and three years after the installation of a variable message advertising sign. The sign, installed April 13, 1984, displayed sporting scores and advertisements, and changed images an average of 12 frames per minute. The purpose of the comparison was to assess whether the presence of the sign correlated with a change in the crash history of I -94. To determine crash rate, the Wisconsin DOT inventoried crashes that occurred on the segment on 1 -94 from where the sign was visible, categorized them into side -swipe and rear -end crashes, and determined the ADT from an automatic traffic recorder. The crash rate was derived from the equation: crash rate per million vehicle miles = crash frequency /(length of segment) *ADT *10 Eastbound Segment. The crash rate for the three years before installation was 3.12 crashes per million vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The three -year crash rate after installation was 4.25 crashes per million VMT. The increase in crash rate after installation was 1.13 crashes per million VMT, or 36 percent. Specifically, the rate of increase for sideswipe crashes was 8 percent, and the rate of increase was 21 percent for rear -end crashes. 9 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Westbound Segment. The crash rate before installation was 2.91 crashes per million VMT, and 3.53 per million VMT after installation, an increase of 0.62 crashes per million VMT or 21 percent. The rate of increase was 35 percent for both sideswipe crashes and rear -end crashes. The Wisconsin DOT concluded from its analysis that the variable message sign had an effect on traffic safety, notably an increase in the rate of sideswipe crashes. In addition, the report concluded that the greater increase in crashes for the eastbound segment was due to the orientation of the sign towards eastbound traffic. (This sign was removed 16 years after it had been installed, when the Milwaukee County Stadium was demolished. A similar sign was installed on the new stadium.) 2.3.3 The Curriden Article A recent court case in Texas arose from a crash in an airport caused by a driver reading an electronic sign that listed departure and arrival times, and gate information. The driver stopped his vehicle to read information on the sign. A second vehicle swerved around the stopped vehicle and side swiped a vehicle in the adjacent lane, resulting in a three - vehicle crash. Two drivers were injured in the crash and sued the airline that owned the EBB. A jury found that the EBB was the indirect cause of a multiple vehicle crash at the airport and returned a negligence verdict against the airline. The airport subsequently removed the EBB. 2.4 Potential Safety Factors 2.4.1 Distraction The review of crashes presented previously suggests that EBBs may be associated with a higher crash rate under certain conditions. If this possibility is verified through further research, then it can be asked whether these crashes are a result of driver distraction in which the distracting stimulus is the EBB. Distraction can be a framework in which to view EBBs and safety. The safety consequences of distraction from the driving task can be profound. Treat et a1. found that driver inattention and improper lookout increase the likelihood of crash occurrence and are major factors underlying the causes of crashes. According to Wang, et al., an analysis conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of causal factors of crashes showed that distraction by sources external to the vehicle accounted for 3.2 percent of the crashes. The external sources included people, events, and non - specified objects. The NHTSA analysis did not identify the external objects, nor did it identify billboards as among the sources of distraction. However, the data suggest that, on occasion, external stimuli can be sufficiently distracting to drivers, causing or resulting in a crash. Distracting Stimuli. One type of distracting stimulus is the unexpected event that results in an involuntary reaction. This type of stimulus is unanticipated and produces a surprise or orienting response — the person will redirect his or her attention to the new event to identify it and assess its significance. Such a stimulus may be an event that is not typical for that time or place, e.g., a flash of light, movement or sound. A more subtle form of distracting stimulus can be one in which the stimulus has a less surprising quality, and thus presents more time for the driver to decide whether to attend to the stimulus and how much attention to direct to the stimulus. Dorneim documented that this has been has been 10 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction a problem for pilots. In some situations, a pilot will occasionally attend more to a secondary task and neglect the primary task of flying the plane, sometimes resulting in a crash. Although the task of flying is obviously different from driving, there may be lessons to be learned for drivers. NASA is currently conducting research on ways to avoid this type of air crash. It may prove useful to check the progress of this research to see whether NASA research results have implications for driver distraction. Some of the research questions involve understanding how people know when to return their attention to a task, as well as identifying the limits of switching between tasks. Measures of Distraction. For this project, driver distraction is characterized as deterioration in driving performance, the primary task, while attending to a second, non - driving task. The second task is subordinate to the driving task. An example of a non-driving task is operating an audiocassette system or using a cellular telephone. When the safe operation of the vehicle is degraded by the performance of the second task, the second task is defined as a "distractor." Safe operation or control of the vehicle is recorded with measures of effectiveness (MOE) for driving. These measures include lateral deviation of the vehicle and maintenance of appropriate speed, as indicated by headway measures. Lack of control indicated by excessive lateral deviation or inappropriate speed could result from distraction, sleepiness, inability to see the road because of weather or lighting, poor perception of road geometry requirements, or other reasons. Since there are multiple factors that can contribute to lack of vehicle control, the design of a distraction study must take into account these other factors and ensure that they do not confound the design and allow misinterpretation of the data. Lateral deviation can be measured by analysis of variability in steering wheel position, and/or varying distance of the vehicle from a lane marking on the road. When measuring lateral deviation, a certain amount of variability in deviation is expected. Greater - than - normal lateral variation may indicate a degree of lack of vehicle control. An example of lateral deviation occurs during the performance of a non-driving task such as the selection, orientation, and insertion of an audiocassette into the cassette player while performing the primary task of negotiating a curve. If the cassette operation is performed in the same manner and at the same rate as when the vehicle is motionless, there is a high likelihood of lateral deviation. This scenario of cassette operation would be an example of a distracting task. Another measure of safe vehicle control is the maintenance of appropriate speed. One driving behavior that would lead to improper speed is the selection of a more or less constant speed (speed invariance) when nearby vehicles change speed. This could result in an unsafe headway condition. Lack of safe control due to improper speed selection could be due to reasons similar to those listed above for lateral deviation. Another behavior measured by speed is the slowing of a vehicle to view an item external to the vehicle. Braking for emergencies may also be considered for a measure of distraction. 2.4.2 Conspicuity of Displays To what degree does an external, conspicuous stimulus unrelated to driving distract a driver from the driving task? This question is basic to the notion that a billboard may degrade driving performance by diverting attention away from the driving task. If a billboard degrades driving performance, it may be useful to identify the components of the billboard that can distract drivers. Some possible distracting components of a display are motion, complexity, and 11 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction illumination. If such qualities are relevant to distraction, do they act alone or do they interact with each other? To the extent that these qualities are identifiable, it may be possible to understand their effect on distraction. A brief review conducted by Hughes and Cole identified the physical properties of a conspicuous object. Important properties that contribute to conspicuity include object size, object contrast with its immediate background as well as the complexity of the background. An additional property is "the boldness of the graphics used to display a message." According to Cole and Hughes, 1 °) conspicuity consists of two types: attention conspicuity and search conspicuity. Attention conspicuity is the "...capacity of an object to attract attention, and...might be measured by the probability of the object being noticed when the observer has not had his or her attention directed to its likely occurrence." Search conspicuity is "... the property of an object that enables it to be quickly and reliably located by search." Cole and Hughes suggest that eye movement that is responding to a stimulus in the peripheral visual field can be used to infer attention conspicuity in the visual mode. Such movement may be a "quasi- reflex eye movement that is related to human defense reaction'' °) Theeuwes challenged the view that conspicuous objects attract attention automatically. Instead, drivers will attend to the driving task and not a distractor. His past research showed that subjects ignored salient objects that were irrelevant to a search task. In a subsequent study, participants were instructed to locate a task- related stimulus (a blue sign) in a video taken from the driver's perspective. Distracting stimuli (e.g., a pedestrian in an orange jacket) were present in some experimental conditions, but not others. The results indicated that when the target stimulus, or blue sign, was in an expected location, the presence of the distractor had no impact. However, when the target was in an unexpected location, thus increasing the search time, the presence of the distractor increased the time required to locate the target above that due to expectation effects. The visual environment affects the conspicuity of objects. Since drivers obtain travel related information by searching the visual environment for a target, such as a street sign, outdoor advertising can compete with targets of driving - related information. The concept of "visual noise" refers to non - target objects in an environment and can be used to determine a sign's conspicuity in a particular environment. Akagi et al. state that "Objects causing visual noise can be defined as objects that hinder drivers' field of view, such as billboards and buildings along roadsides." This study reported that increases in the visual noise (i.e., the number of signs in a roadway location) correlated with longer search time required for drivers to locate a target sign. In a study performed by Hughes and Cole regarding the conspicuity of roadside objects, drivers reported "all the objects or things that attracted their attention" as they drove through 20 km of residential streets and arterial roads. Afterwards, they observed a film of the same route, taken from the driver viewpoint. Advertising displays accounted for 13.7 percent of reports in the driving study and 10.2 percent in the laboratory study. Driving related objects (road, traffic control devices (TCDs), vehicles, and people) accounted for 51.4 percent of reports in the driving task and 57.9 percent in the laboratory study. Other non - driving task elements included immediate and general roadway surroundings. Advertising elements were reported equally on arterial and shopping center routes, and more so than on residential streets. However, in 12 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction residential streets, drivers directed more attention to non - driving related elements. This suggested a possible spare attention capacity. A field study by Luoma( 1 3) analyzed driver eye fixations on roadside advertisements during a 50 km drive in Finland. Results indicated that accurate perception of advertisements was associated with longer fixation times (2.3 sec) than the times for pedestrian markings and speed limit signs (0.4 sec to 0.5 sec). The author concluded, "...long fixation times indicate that the characteristics of roadside advertisements related to information ergonomics are poor.' Information ergonomics is the practice of providing information in the most efficient way, such that viewers can access the information quickly and clearly. Roadway Context. Determining whether billboards influence driver behavior would require understanding the roadway context of a billboard. For example, roadway factors such as the angular distance of a billboard, billboard placement and volume characteristics of an intersection, may influence driver responsiveness to visual stimuli and the experience of workload. In this sense, information on the effect of the roadway context on driving performance should assist in defining appropriate billboard locations. Research on driver search behavior in high and low volume intersections by Rahimi, Briggs and Thorny 1 4) in 1990, suggests that higher volumes of traffic affect driver eye and head movements. The research indicates that the greater visual complexity associated with the high volume intersection required drivers to search the environment more than in the low volume intersections. It can be conjectured that additional visual stimuli, such as billboards, may add additional demand to driver workload in high - volume intersections. 2.4.3 Legibility One event that can be considered a distraction occurs when a driver passes a sign where the text has poor legibility. The weakness in legibility may be due to poor character font design, improper spacing of letters, or other factors. However, if the information is of sufficient interest, the driver may try to read all of the text anyway. Such a decision could take time away from the driving task thus increasing crash risk. If on the other hand, the sign had text that met legibility standards, less effort would be required to read the sign. Although this situation is a more subtle distraction than that due to perceived motion in a sign, it still could present potential for crash risk. Legibility information is available for CMSs. Although the CMS is restricted to providing roadway related information, its legibility requirements may be relevant to the design of the simpler EBB Luminance and Luminous Contrast. Garvey and Mace examined CMSs to identify the features that contribute to their visibility. Both field and laboratory studies were employed following a review of the literature. Of particular interest in this report are the requirements for lighting, such as the luminance value and contrast ratio necessary for legible viewing. The study discussed requirements for displays such as LEDs, fiber optics, lamps, flip discs, and reflective discs. The authors provide guidelines that are aimed at improving the visibility of all CMSs, regardless of technology. Minimum luminance values were recommended for CMS visibility. These values are based on the 85 percentile driver accommodated at 198 m (650 ft). Age and position of the sun were two of the most significant factors when determining minimum luminance. Values are presented for drivers in two age ranges (16 -40 and 65 or older). When the CMS is backlit (sun behind and 13 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction above CMS) or under washout conditions (low sun shining directly on CMS), 1000 cd/m is recommended for both age groups. This value accommodates less than 50 percent of older drivers at any luminance level with extreme sun angles. When the sun is directly behind the CMS, few if any people will be able to read the characters under any luminance level. When the sun is overhead the 65 years and over group still requires 1000 cd/m but only 850 cd/m are required for the younger group. During overcast or rain, 600 cd/m is required for the older group and 350 cd/m for the younger. For the nighttime condition, both groups require a luminance of 30 cd/m According to Garvey and Mace, ' 5) there should be a minimum luminous contrast between the unlighted and lighted elements on a CMS; a maximum luminous contrast was not provided. Contrast orientation should always be positive, that is, the characters should be lighted against a dark or less luminous background. A negative contrast is likely to result in a 25 percent shorter legibility distance. Contrast luminance for a CMS was determined with the formula: where: L, — Lb Lb L luminance of a character module with all of the elements "on" Lb = luminance of a character module with all of the elements "off" The minimum acceptable contrast luminance is 5, and the optimal contrast luminance varies from 5 to 50. A summary of existing literature on sign visibility performed by Kuhn, Garvey and Pietrucha, ' 6) examined the two main research areas of sign detection; that is, sign conspicuity and sign legibility. The emphasis was on the more familiar and traditional sign rather than electronic signs. It is likely, however, that the design of an electronic sign would benefit from some of this information. A series of visibility guidelines for on- premise signs was presented. (An on- premise sign disseminates information that directly relates to the use of the property on which it is located.) Later research by Kuhn compared lighting methods (external illumination, internal illumination with opaque background, internal illumination with translucent background and neon) under day and night conditions to examine sign visibility features. Claus and Claus addressed the issue of startling types of signs, such as those employing "flashing or animation to catch attention." These authors discuss different types of motion or movement. One of these is "...jumping arrows, or rapidly chasing or flashing lamp borders... (that) should perhaps be limited to midways and to rows of theater marquees." They did allow for other pictorial sequences that may be more acceptable as well as alternating displays such as the time and temperature display. Alphanumeric Characters and Their Spacing. The design or selection of font type and the spacing between characters (letters), words and sentences are critical in achieving effective legibility of signs, especially when legibility is defined by the distance at which a sign can be read. Garvey & Mace ' 5) provided draft guidelines for the design of the elements and characters that compose a word and word groupings on a CMS, in which the character font is composed of 14 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction light emitting elements. To achieve effective legibility, a number of features are considered. It is important to address each of the features, since they interact with each other. For example, to design an upper case character font, use a 5 x 7 matrix of light emitting elements. However, with a small matrix of this size, it is well to avoid thickening of a line in a character (e.g., as in an "I" or "T ") by adding another row or column of elements because the legibility distance is shortened by about 25 percent. Font design for exterior signs should be simple without serifs. Additional information was provided on the height of the character, the proportion of the character or width -to- height ratio, and stroke width of the character. Further information was provided on the spacing between letters, between words and between lines of characters. Signs with light emitting elements have special characteristics. Light emitting elements provide high contrast between characters and background and thus provide superior performance over reflective signs at night. However, the light intensity requires careful adjustment. According to Garvey and Mace,( 15) high contrast produced by lighted elements at night can "create halation or irradiation, blurring letters with wide stroke widths." Message Length. A series of studies was performed by McNees and Messer 9) to evaluate urban freeway guide signing. A study relevant to EBB issues examined the reading time required for guide signs. Study variables included `bits" (i.e., the amount of information on each panel) and number of sign panels. A typical sign panel contained an exit number, exit direction, cardinal direction, route number, and two destinations. It also included symbols such as a shield, and directional arrows. Examples of bits of information were: "1-395," "Washington, D.C." and "South." Each sign panel had, on average, six bits of information. The display time of the sign simulated the total time a driver would have available to read a guide sign in a typical freeway environment. The display times provided for reading the signs represented three traffic conditions: "extreme" (2.5 sec display time), "minimum" (4 sec display time), and "desirable" (6 sec display time). Median reading times for these conditions were: 1.7 sec (extreme), 2.0 sec (minimum), and 2.9 sec (desirable). The results indicated that the time used to read the signs was dependent on quantity of information per sign as well as time available to perform the task. Based on these results, the authors concluded that the information content of a highway guide sign should not exceed six bits of information per panel. 2.5 The Driver 2.5.1 Driver Age The analysis of distraction should consider the effect of driver age. If a significant portion of the driving population is more susceptible to distraction, then research on the relationship between distraction and safety should recognize this susceptibility. Such research could provide information about age - related differences regarding visual capability or reaction times that are relevant to driver reaction to EBBs. Both older drivers and young/inexperienced drivers are examined in this discussion. The highway safety community recognizes that the probability of crash involvement varies with driver characteristics, most notably age. Highway data analysis demonstrates that the young driver and older driver populations have high crash involvement, and elevated injury and fatality rates. According to the Transportation Research Board's Special Report Number 229, the high involvement rate of older drivers in crashes is second only to the rates of young drivers 15 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Experience and age may be important factors to consider in the evaluation of the effects EBBs have on safety. The research literature provides a firm foundation for stating that age and experience need to be considered. If EBBs are ultimately found to have a high degree of attention conspicuity — that they compel drivers to attend to them — then it is reasonable to expect that populations such as older or inexperienced drivers, who have less attention to spare, will be placed at greater risk by EBBs. The Older Driver. According to Barr and Eberhard, the safety and mobility of older drivers, generally defined as 65 years of age and above, are highly relevant to transportation planning. Because of an increasingly aged population, the number and proportion of older drivers are rising. By 2020, Waller has estimated that 17 percent (50 million people) of the United States population will consist of people 65 years and older, compared to 12 percent in 1988. The proportion of older adults licensed to drive is increasing. For example, in 1980, 60 percent of older adults (at least age 65) were licensed drivers, compared to 70 percent in 1989. These data point to the need to include older drivers in research programs on roadway safety, including the evaluation of EBBs and distraction. Older drivers have a high crash risk per mile (22) They are involved in a disproportionate number of fatal crashes and multi-vehicle crashes where they were the responsible party,(23, 24) and are over - represented in crashes that involve turns, merges, and yielding the right of way. '25> Recent studies performed by Ball and Owsley point to cognitive demands as influential factors in driving. Visual processing speed and the ability to handle selective and divided attention demands may have the greatest impact on crash rates. An increase in age did not directly contribute to crash involvement. However, an increase in age correlated with lower processing speed and decreased attention. The fact that attention and visual processing speed degrade with age may be symptomatic of the increasing inability of older drivers to encode and process all but the most important information in the driving environment. The Younger Driver. The young driver (16 to 24 years old) is more likely to be involved in a crash than drivers of other ages, and a driver under 23 years of age is 2.5 times more likely to be killed in a crash than drivers 25 years and older, according to the NHTSA. Whereas the young driver crash risk on a per -mile driven basis is greater than the crash risk of other drivers, their risk decreases on the continuum from 16 to 24 years old, according to Lerner et a1.' Incidents involving younger drivers are attributed to age and experience - related factors. Widely recognized age - related factors reported by Decina et al. include risk- taking and alcohol consumption. Experience - related factors include the psychomotor, perceptual, and cognitive skills required for steering and maintaining speed, driving during high risk periods (such as at night), inefficient or inappropriate scanning behavior, poor hazard recognition, and poor driving judgment and decision - making. The young driver demonstrates poorer coordination of separate driving tasks and tends to concentrate on one aspect of performance, such as maintaining lane position. According to Mournat et a1., the visual scanning behavior of a young driver is less effective than that of mature drivers because the young driver tends to focus more closely in front of the vehicle. Furthermore, Miltenburg and Kuikeni report that the inexperienced driver is likely to have attention drawn to irrelevant but "attention - getting" objects. The aforementioned research suggests that the young driver may be more vulnerable to distractions than the more mature 16 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction driver. The data indicate that the young driver has weak situational awareness and relatively poor focus on the driving task itself. Thus, distracting stimuli, inside or extemal to the vehicle, may adversely affect the young driver. 2.5.2 Driver Familiarity with Route Commuters and visitors require different information while traveling. The familiar driver requires more information on traffic conditions and incidents, whereas the visitor requires more navigational and guidance information. A field study of driver visual search and scan patterns performed by Mourant et a1.' showed that drivers' visual fixations on traffic, road and lane markers, and bridges and road signs decreased as the drivers became more familiar with the routes. One conclusion from these data is that drivers who are familiar with a roadway may be less likely to attend to familiar signs, including EBBs. Thus, differences between visitors and commuters in visual attention to commercial signs may be a relevant variable in assessment of distraction effects of EBBs since more eye - catching displays may be needed to attract the commuter. 2.6 Measures of Effectiveness 2.6.1 Surrogates Commercial EBBs are designed to "catch the eye" of drivers. Their presence may distract drivers from concentrating on the driving task and the visual surrounds. Research in other areas share a concern about driver distraction and may be applicable to the question of EBBs and driving performance. Investigations of driver distraction and safety have notably focused on two cases: cellular telephone use while driving, and in- vehicle information displays. In each case, the application of a new technology raised concerns about driver distraction. The following sections highlight research in these areas. Cellular Telephone Use in Vehicles. The number of cellular telephone users reported by Cain and Burris in 1998 was 63 million, and at a growth rate of 40 percent per year, the NHTSA estimates that the number of users will reach 80 million by 2000. The increase in the number of cellular telephone customers, in combination with high -profile crashes involving cellular telephone use, has raised public awareness of the safety aspects of in- vehicle telephone use and led to legislative initiatives aimed at restraining telephone use in vehicles. Crash Risk Analyses. Redelmeier and Ticshirani performed an epidemiological study of crash risk associated with cellular telephone use linked customer telephone bills to crash records maintained at the New York Collision Reporting Center to identify telephone use at the time of a crash The study concluded that cellular telephone use quadrupled the risk of a crash during the call. Another epidemiological study performed by Violanti (35) found a 34 percent increase in risk of crash among vehicles with celluar telephones. Application to EBBs. Using cellular telephones while driving imposes at least three tasks: first, manually manipulating the telephone, which could affect control of the vehicle; second, glancing at the telephone, which requires looking away from the roadway; and third, engaging in conversation, which may disrupt concentration. The relevance of information on cellular telephone use to EBBs lies in visual (glancing) and cognitive (mental engagement) behaviors. Viewing EBBs or using a telephone requires drivers to look away from the roadway for some 17 Research Review of Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction period. Similarly, reading a sign could disrupt a driver's concentration, just as engaging in a telephone conversation might. According to Cain and Burris, hands -free telephone use carries about the same risk observed in hand -held use, and a NHTSA report cites that a telephone conversation is a factor in crashes more frequently than dialing. Cain and Bun believe that the type of conversation is significant in determining crash risk, and McKnight and McKnight believe that complex and intense conversations the riskiest and simple conversation relatively risk -free. Thus, becoming mentally preoccupied can be as distracting to a driver as manually operating a telephone or glancing away from the roadway. In- vehicle Information Systems. Advances in communications technology have enabled the development of electronic devices that display traveler - related information to drivers in transit. Such devices can potentially redirect (or distract) a driver's attention from the primary task of driving. An examination of in- vehicle distractions may contribute to an understanding for potential out -of- vehicle distractions such as EBBs. The presence of in- vehicle devices that provide traveler- related information, such as turn -by -turn directions, has raised questions regarding the amount of time taken away from the driving task by the information display. One concern is that a driver will underestimate the amount of time required to use the device, take longer than expected, thus taking too much time away from the driving task. This is similar to the concern in which a driver spends too much time looking at a stimulus external to the vehicle. In order to measure visual distraction associated with the use of in- vehicle devices, a methodological approach was developed based on eye glances. This method calculates the total number and average duration of eye glances required to operate specific in- vehicle devices. Data compiled from research in the late 1980's defined the average time for a single glance and the average number of total glances required to use a variety of devices. Devices were the speedometer, mirrors, standard radio, climate controls, smoking/lighting, fuel gage, heating/air conditioner, map, and others. For example, using the radio required 1.20 sec of glance time and 3.5 total glances, and reading the map required 1.70 sec of glance time, and 5.0 total glances. Wierwille and Tijerina performed one investigation into this issue that compared exposure levels for in- vehicle devices to number of crashes associated with the use of these devices. Exposure was the number of glances, multiplied by the time for a single glance, multiplied by the frequency of use. When the variety of in- vehicle devices was examined in light of both number of crashes and their exposure, a linear relationship resulted such that the greater the exposure, the greater the number of crashes. This study suggested that the "...relative number of accidents is directly related to visual resource allocation for in- vehicle tasks." The data regarding amount of time used for in- vehicle devices reported in this study may be a useful starting point for estimating the maximum amount of time that a driver can attend to a distraction outside the vehicle. 2.6.2 Current Measurement of Distraction It would be beneficial to measure the effect that EBBs have on driver distraction. Such measures for EBBs and other stimuli external to the vehicle have not yet been developed. However, there is one approach being developed for in- vehicle information systems that, with some refinement, may serve as a measure of EBB distraction. 18 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Olsson and Bums describe a peripheral detection task (PDT) that is designed to measure visual distraction and driver mental workload. This study included measures of reaction time and correct detection rate for drivers who were asked to report the presence of an LED dot shown briefly at slightly different locations on a windshield while: 1) driving on country roads and a motorway and 2) performing a secondary task while driving. The dots were projected 11- 23 degrees to the left of the straight -ahead view and 2 -4 degrees above the horizon. This location approximates the visual angle that corresponds to a pedestrian or some roadside signs. Statistically significant results indicated that a CD manipulation task and a backwards counting task required a longer performance time and resulted in fewer correct detections than the baseline driving task. Since these drivers missed more targets when performing a secondary task and because it took longer to report the targets that were spotted, the PDT may be useful in assessing the distractibility of in- vehicle systems. The authors briefly discuss the necessity of defining a criterion such as a percentage correct detection rate and/or reaction time that would define driver distraction. If the PDT can be applied to in- vehicle systems, it may also be applicable to stimuli external to the vehicle such as EBB and tri- vision signs. It would be necessary to adapt the methodology from an in- vehicle task to a vehicle - external stimulus and to define a criterion for distraction. The PDT procedure might also be employed in addition to the driver performance measures described above, i.e., measures of lateral deviation and speed selection. 19 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 3 SYNTHESIS The objective of the literature review was to identify and summarize the potential safety effects of EBBS on driving behavior. The present discussion examines the results of that review. One of the initial sections of the review sought research reports that directly approached the safety effects of EBBS on the driver by examining crash rates related to the EBB; unfortunately, this subject is not well documented. In most instances, researchers were not able to verify that an EBB was a major factor in causing a crash. Only one study since the 1980 review and one lawsuit were identified. After presenting research that directly addressed the relationship of EBBs to crashes, the literature review examined research regarding distraction, conspicuity, and legibility. Studies were identified that verified that: an increase in distraction, a decrease in conspicuity, or a decrease in legibility may cause an increase in the crash rate. While all of the identified research was transportation related research, only the legibility research examined electronic signs (e.g., CMSs). There is indication that individual differences in age and driving experience may be important considerations in driver distraction, and are relevant to understanding driver responses to the external environment. Furthermore, research regarding driver familiarity of their route demonstrated that visual fixations on roadway signs decreases as route familiarity increases. This research may show that there is a difference between commuter and visiting drivers. While the surrogates that were identified in Section 2.6.1 are not related to EBBs, it is believed that the planning that is performed in these fields is useful to this review. Research concerning in- vehicle distractions caused by cellular telephones and navigation display was reviewed in an attempt to associate conditions in which driver distraction can be identified and to determine how a driver may react. Further review of these fields is warranted at a later date. At this point, it appears that there is no effective technique or method appropriate for evaluating the safety effects of EBBS on driver attention or distraction. Crash studies can show that EBBs may increase the crash rate, but research regarding driver familiarity can argue that commuter drivers may not even look at an EBB. This example is nicely illustrated by the Milwaukee County Stadium's variable message advertising sign. A before and after crash analysis showed an increase in the crash rate after the installation of the sign, but not to the point to warrant its removal and the sign remained in -place for 16 years. The literature review identified research that addressed particular characteristics of an EBB. For example, distraction, conspicuity and legibility research performed on CMSs is relevant to the contrast and luminance of an EBB. The following section of this document takes EBB research to the next level. It presents a research plan that will allow for a more complete understanding of the potential safety effects of EBBs on driver attention and distraction by pulling together the information that has been gathered from unrelated studies and recommend a research plan to help answer the knowledge gaps. 20 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 4 RESEARCH NEEDS The synthesis of the review indicated several areas in which more information would contribute to a better understanding of the safety implication of EBBs and tri vision signs. These areas are expanded into research recommendations in this section. Each of these recommendations or research questions presented in this section reflect a concem for driving safety. To obtain information regarding the influence of EBBs or tri- vision signs on driving performance, it is necessary to examine these displays in a variety of situations. For instance, it is possible that driving performance would be affected on curves but not on tangent road segments. The depiction of motion on a screen may be disruptive to driving whereas a static screen may not. The primary objective of the research to be proposed is to determine whether there are conditions under which EBB or tri- vision signs constitute a driving concern as indicated by crashes or other form of degraded driver performance. If such conditions are identified, then additional research may be required to gain a detailed understanding of the issue. These research goals will be identified as Research Questions. Information that was available in an area that may support EBB safety was identified as Research Findings. This information primarily focuses on text issues, particularly with the legibility of letters and words; information regarding symbols or graphics was not identified. Since the identified research was not performed in an EBB context, it may be worthwhile to replicate selected research findings in conditions based on EBB requirements. Thus, some of the findings will be followed by research questions. The issues described below have been researched to varying degrees. Some questions, such as the effect of a motion -based display on driving safety, have not been fully researched yet. Other issues, such as minimum exposure time for a display, have been addressed by states with little or no research basis. Questions on legibility have been addressed, but in a context for providing traffic information to drivers. The research questions fall into three general areas of highway safety: the roadway, EBBs and tri- vision signs, and the driver. The section on EBBs and tri vision signs is presented in two parts: the first addresses relatively global aspects of the billboard such as motion phenomena and exposure time. The second part addresses the more detailed issues of individual letters and words. 4.1 Roadway Characteristics Different roadway characteristics exert varying demands upon driver attention and skill. Particular roadway configurations and their characteristics may be more or less suitable for EBBs, and are important to consider when evaluating the safety effects of EBBs. The roadway characteristics listed below have special considerations relative to the issue of distraction and safety. • Horizontal and Vertical Curves. Compared to tangents, curved roadway segments require more adept handling from drivers. Thus, any distraction presented by an EBB may be larger in conditions when the driver is experiencing greater demands. Research Questions - Curves: Is driver performance affected adversely by the presence of EBB or tri- vision signs on vertical curves, horizontal curves or even at a tangent segment? What is the role of vehicle speed and posted speed in this question? What effect does the radius of the curve, or other features of the horizontal curve, have in this 21 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction situation? Does vehicle speed change on a tangent segment in the presence of an EBB or tri-vision sign? • Interchanges and Intersections . Demands made upon the driver increase at interchanges and intersections. For example, at highway interchanges, drivers execute multiple tasks, including controlling lateral position in their lane, maintaining appropriate headway and speed, and navigating through traffic as they merge or tum. At intersections, drivers are required to attend to multiple sources of potential conflicts, such as pedestrian crossings, changing traffic control devices, and turning maneuvers. Potentially distracting stimuli, including EBBs, may be particularly disruptive to drivers under the increased demands associated with interchanges and intersections. Current federal and state statutes prohibit the placement of roadside signs and displays near interchanges and intersections. EBBs offer a potential for driver distraction similar to or greater than conventional billboards, and should be considered to be subject to the same restrictions on placement near interchanges or intersections. Current state statues and regulations employ different values ranging from 152 to 305 m (500 to 1000 ft). The effects of EBBS and tri-vision signs on driver performance should be examined to determine if performance deficits are observed. Research Questions - Intersections: Will an EBB or a tri-vision sign located near an intersection contribute to degraded driver performance? If driving performance is found to be degraded, then what should be the distance between this type of display and the intersection? Research Questions - Interchanges: Will an EBB or a tri- vision sign located near an interchange contribute to degraded driver performance? If driving performance is found to be degraded, then what should be the distance between this type of display and the interchange? • Work Zones. Drivers traveling in work zones need to be alert for changing traffic patterns, sudden stops, workers, pedestrians, and work equipment. Although drivers should reduce their speed in these zones, they often do not reduce speed sufficiently. This has resulted in special efforts by states to encourage safer driver behavior in such zones. Whatever the reason for current selection of improper speed in a work zone, it is possible that the presence of an EBB or tri- vision sign would aggravate the problem. Research about the effects of EBBs in work zones on safety should be performed, since the presence of additional visual distractions may elevate the risk of driver distraction and unsafe driving. Research Questions — Work Zone: Will an EBB or a tri- vision sign that is located near a work zone promote unsafe driving? What constitutes close proximity to a work zone and how should the work zone dimensions be defined relative to the EBB? • Distance between EBBs/Tri vision Signs. Drivers may not direct sufficient attention to the driving task if EBB or tri- vision signs are too close to each other. Federal and state regulations address conventional billboards on this factor. Due to the greater conspicuity of EBBs relative to conventional billboards, it may be useful to reexamine the minimum distance between EBBs and tri- vision signs. 22 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Research Question — Distance Between EBB /Tri- vision Signs: Define an appropriate distance between EBBs and/or tri- vision signs that ensures driving safety. 4.2 EBB and Tri - vision Sign Characteristics Research on EBBs should be directed toward the characteristics of EBBs, including placement, visual movement, and luminance. Research should include the characteristics of EBBS listed below. • Message Content and Comprehensibility. If a driver attempts to read a display (either text or graphic) that is difficult to read due to factors such as excessive information, unfamiliar terms, and/or poor choice of word order, then the driver may not devote sufficient time to the driving task, thus raising a safety concern. Research Finding- Amount of Information: An analysis of the amount of information on static guide signs recommended that a sign panel should present no more than six bits of information. Examples of a "bit" of information provided by McNess and Messer ' 9) include "1-395, "Washington, D.C." and "South." Research Question Amount of Information: This finding should be replicated in an EBB and/or tri- vision sign context. The terms and symbols used in the context of a roadway environment may present somewhat different results due, perhaps, to familiarity of terms. Another feature that is different is the use of pixels on EBB displays versus the painted signs in the roadway study. Research Questions — Quantity of Text: The Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Section 2E-21 (applicable to CMSs for use on freeway and expressway mainlines), states that a CMS should display no more than three lines of text. Further, there should be a maximum of 20 characters per line. An analysis of these numbers for the simpler EBB displays, in conjunction with analyses of exposure times, may be useful. The acceptable amount of information in the pictorial and/or dynamic display, both EBB and tri- vision sign, could be determined at the same time. In these situations, other display components such as graphics, motion and/or exposure time should be examined in conjunction with quantity of information. • Exposure Times. The time intervals associated with the display of an image and the transition between images may be important to safe driving and effective driver understanding of the display. The design of an EBB or tri- vision sign message will be more effective when the time constraints for the driving task and the required time for effective message transmission are considered together. A related factor is the length of the transition interval between messages or images. Transition time can be important during the rotation of elements on a tri- vision sign due to the visual effects of the rotation. Transition in an EBB can be almost instantaneous. The minimum exposure time for a display and maximum time for display transition have been provided by some states. Research Questions — Exposure Time: What factors determine the interval length for the safe display of a message? How can specific display times be determined? (For CMSs, the MUTCD 2000, (39) Section 2E-21 states that "The entire message cycle should be readable at least twice by drivers traveling at the posted speed, the off -peak 85 - percentile speed, or the operating speed. ") 23 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Research Questions — Transition Time: What is a safe transition time between messages? During the transition, should the display be completely dark? Should a transition interval between motion displays be a different time than a transition interval for static displays? ■ Motion and Other Image Components. Some stimuli are particularly effective in attracting attention. It is not always clear which feature(s) of a complex stimulus is the most compelling. Motion is a highly likely candidate for an effective attention grabber. Motion can be provided in a billboard display in at least two ways. An EBB display provides motion when its lighted elements or pixels present an image in apparent movement across the display. An example is a high- resolution picture similar to a television image or video. Another example would be a text message sliding in from the side, top, or bottom. A tri-vision sign provides mechanical motion when its triangular elements rotate to present an alternate image. In this case, the motion is provided during a transition between displays. The motion component of an EBB or tri- vision sign may be more of a distraction than message content or pictorial arrangement. This possibility exists because a motion requires time and if a driver wants to see the entire movement for some inherent interest, then the driver will focus more on the motion display and less on the driving task. Note that the MUTCD 2000, Section 2E-21 states that, "Techniques of message display such as fading, exploding, dissolving, or moving messages shall not be used" for a CMS. Research Questions — Motion Effects: To what extent will motion in an EBB or tri-vision sign contribute to degraded driver performance? What are the relevant dimensions of motion (e.g, presence vs. absence; low, medium or high speed; constant speed vs. variable speed; constant direction of moving item vs. change in direction)? How might motion interact with the content in a display to affect driver performance? Is the length of the interval during which motion occurs an important factor? Contexts to be considered for this research may include interchanges, intersections, curves, different vehicle speeds, and various TCDs including traffic signals. Research Questions — Other Image Components: How should the components of the image, or their combination, (e.g., motion, color, message content, amount of information) be examined to determine which are most likely to be particularly distracting? Or is the distractibility of these components conditional to the specific situations? • Maintenance. Poor maintenance of an EBB or tri-vision sign can affect driving safety. If the letters and words become difficult to perceive due to scratched protective covers or because elements are not functioning due to wear, drivers interested in the expected message may devote too much attention to interpreting the characters. One phenomena requiring maintenance that may be unique to programmed light emitting elements is the condition in which some of the lighted pixels in a display fail to illuminate, thereby removing part of the word. In the same display, other pixels that should be off are lighted instead. In some cases, the display presents a sort of abstract design that may be engaging for its own sake. Depending on the particular instance, the message becomes difficult if not impossible to read, thus lengthening the time that a driver attends to the display. 24 ti Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Research Questions - Maintenance: Define the features of a sign that, if not maintained properly, contribute to driver safety issues. Develop criteria for achieving a minimal level of sign maintenance including a schedule and process for monitoring and repairing the sign. 4.3 Research Findings in Legibility This section focuses on Research Findings that appear relevant to the use of text and graphical information on EBBs. These findings resulted from research on CMS displays that are used to transmit roadway information to drivers. The degree to which these findings are relevant may depend on the visual similarity between the EBB and the CMS. The CMS has a similar appearance to the simpler version of the EBB that was described in Section 2.1. Recall that the simpler version was characterized as employing a small character matrix for light emitted letters that are located on a dark background panel. It typically presents a limited number of words. The resemblance between CMS and EEB is likely to become less, however, with an opportunity for employing motion, a variety of colors, and higher resolution matrices. Such differences emphasize the need for research into EBB legibility. The present Research Findings are provided here as a starting point for that research. Illegible letters, words and images promote longer reading times. This can result in a longer time for driver attention to be diverted away from the driving task. Because EBB letters are presented in a different medium than those in the more familiar road guide sign, they require special attention. The letters and numerals on a CMS or EBB are often formed from a group of lighted pixels or elements that are arranged in a rectangular matrix. The font or design of the letter is constrained by the number and arrangement of elements. The resulting font is different than the familiar fonts seen on paper and painted surfaces in several respects. First, the latter family of fonts can take on a large variety of styles that take advantage of the flexibility of the brush or the dexterity of the type designer. Many of the simpler EBB displays, on the other hand, currently use a basic font matrix composed of few elements (e.g., 4x6, 5x7). This small number of elements severely limits the variety of font styles available and results in a relatively crude font style. Second, note that the discrete elements in the small matrix present a discontinuous letter "stroke" that is not present in the traditional medium, that is, the eye can perceive a separation between the light elements if the sign is not too distant. Third, the EBB matrix is represented by elements that emit light compared to the black print that is read under light. Fourth, the EBB matrix is viewed in both night and day conditions whereas the traditional printed page is viewed and read under only lighted conditions. Due to factors such as these, it is important to have research that directly addresses the legibility needs of the lighted pixel element display. A recent summary of legibility data is available for CMSs on the roadway and was compiled by Garvey and Mace (15) This information was compiled from a field survey of in -use CMSs, laboratory experiments and static field studies, and a partially controlled dynamic field study. From these results, the authors developed recommendations for CMSs. Information selected from these recommendations is presented in this section as research findings that may be useful for EBB design. Note, however, that this information was developed for CMSs and may not be directly transferable to an EBB due to differences in how they are used. EBB signs may have different requirements than the CMS and this may lead to different findings when researched. 25 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Thus, information on CMS legibility should be considered only as approximate reference data for EBB design. This section addresses only the legibility of letters and numerals that are composed of matrix elements for the simpler EBB. The legibility of pictures and other non -text graphics is not addressed. Legibility features that are addressed below include luminance, contrast, matrix size, letter size and proportion, and letter and letter group spacing. • Luminance. In the determination of minimum luminance values for CMS signs, driver age and sun position relative to the CMS are important factors. Research Finding — Minimum Luminance: Recommended minimum luminance values (cd/m for CMS visibility' provided by Garvey and Mace are shown below: Table 2. Recommended Minimum Luminance Values (cd /m2) for CMS Visibility. Sun Behind Sun On. Sign ` Sun Overhead ` $.1 vergast%Rain Nighttime' . tZ x a : �,A"7«5 Young Driver 1000 1000 850 (16 -40) Older Driver 1000 1000 1000 (65 +) 350 30 600 30 Source: Garvey and Mace. 1 85` percentile driver accommodated at 198 m (650 ft). 2 Will accommodate Less than 50 percent of drivers at 198 m (650 ft) at any luminance level with extreme sun angles. Luminance levels for night were recommended to be between 30 and 150 cd/m Research Question — Luminance In Inclement Weather: An important consideration for night viewing of an EBB is whether or not heavy moisture conditions such as fog, snow, or rain are present. These conditions may have a diffusing effect on luminance such that a sign with normal luminance may have altered contrast in fog conditions. It would be useful to define maximum luminance in fog conditions and various glare thresholds for young and older drivers. • Contrast and Contrast Orientation. Clear discrimination of letters from their background is a basic requirement for seeing the letter and reading the text. Research Finding — Contrast Luminance: A ratio of an effective range of contrast luminance for CMS letters against their background is between 5 and 50 (15). Five represents a relatively low contrast between letter and background. Fifty indicates a high contrast. Research Finding — Contrast Orientation: Light text letters on a darker background are preferred. A black background or colored background is acceptable.° 5) • Matrix Size. The design of individual letters and numerals for the simpler EBB is based on a matrix of rows and columns in which each matrix element contains one "pixel." Each pixel can be selected to emit light or not emit light. The number of rows and 26 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction columns in a matrix is established to support the design of a character (letter or numeral). The size (number of rows and columns) of the character matrix is often the same for the design of all letters in the alphabet unless a continuous line matrix or full matrix is available. A given letter or numeral is defined by which pixels in the matrix are illuminated. In the 5 x 7 font discussed by Garvey and Mace,' 5) an 'T' is defined with 7 vertical pixels and an "M" is defined with a combination of 18 vertical and diagonal pixels. One issue for displays with larger pixels is to select a matrix with sufficient rows and columns to provide a legible character. If there are too few rows and/or columns, the design of the character font will result in a character that is difficult to recognize and read. If the size becomes overly large, space could be wasted for no noticeable increase in legibility. Maintenance may also increase due to an increasing number of lighted pixels. Research Finding — Matrix Definition: A 5 x 7 matrix that used a single stroke font was found to be one of the most effective matrix sizes for characters used on a CMS. ° 5) The researchers recommended against using a double stroke font. One example of a double stroke font is defined by using two columns of pixels to form a vertical element in a letter such as "F" or "H." The researchers report that double fonts yield legibility distances about 25 percent shorter than regular fonts. Research Question — Matrix Definition: As indicated by the researchers, various legibility factors are difficult to examine apart from each other. While the single stroke 5 x 7 matrix appears to be a generally robust minimum matrix size, it would be useful to replicate this finding for the simpler EBB context when analyzing other legibility factors. • Letter Size and Proportion. The overall proportion of a letter and its components, as well as its height is an important determinant of the distance at which a letter can be recognized. The selection of these dimensions and proportions should consider a number of factors including posted speed and driver age. Research Finding - Letter Height: Letter heights have been researched. For instance, a letter height of 457 mm (18 in) was recommended for a CMS on roadways with an 89- km/h (55 -mi/h) speed limit. This value is intended to accommodate drivers over 60 years of age.° Research Finding - Letter Width -to- Height Ratio: Width -to- height ratio should be at least 0.7 for a CMS. Legibility distance increases as much as 10 to 15 percent as the width -to- height ratio is increased from 0.7 to 1.0. Note, however, that this results in a corresponding increase in the width of a letter on the CMS Research Finding - Stroke - Width -to- Height Ratio: A stroke - width -to- height ratio of no more than 0 13 is recommended for the CMS letter. Factors that enter this ratio are driver age, time of day, luminous intensity of the pixel element and amount of moisture in the air. For example at night, halation or irradiation can occur with light emitting elements at night that results in blurring of elements and letters. The distance at which a letter is legible will decrease by as much as 10 percent as stroke width ratio approaches 0.2. Research Question — Letter Height: The distance at which characters should be legible for roadway information functions may differ from the commercial requirements of the 27 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction simpler EBB. The EBB requirements for letter height and proportion should be defined and examined with other relevant factors that determine letter height in an EBB context. • Spacing Between Letters and Letter Groups. The degree of separation between letters influences their legibility. If they are too close, the letters appear to run together and require longer recognition time. This is particularly true at night for letters composed of light emitting elements. Because of the high contrast, luminous letters of the CMS tend to blur together more readily than the letters on standard signs. As a result, the separation between light emitted letters should be greater. Research Finding — Inter - Letter Spacing: For CMS signs that do not allow proportional spacin between letters, research indicates an inter- letter spacing of one -half the letter height." 5) Research Finding - Inter -Word Spacing: For CMS signs that have an inter -letter spacing of one -half the letter height or have proportional spacing, research indicates an inter -word spacing of the height of the letter. For inter -letter spacing 3/7 the letter height or less, inter -word spacing can be equal to 5/7 the letter height(' 5) Research Finding — Inter -Line Spacing: An inter -line spacing of 70 percent of letter height is suggested for CMS signs with more than two lines of text. Twenty percent of letter height should be adequate for the separation between two lines of text. The 70 percent separation is important for providing legibility for the middle line when there are three lines of text. ' 5) Research Question — Spacing: Commercial signs may employ different features than used in the research referred to in this section. For instance, if a higher resolution matrix were used to present a commercial logo symbol or lower case letters, then the requirement(s) for letter separation may change. Such features may benefit from further research. 4.4 Driver Characteristics Research on distraction effects of EBBS should include the variables of driving skill and vulnerability to distraction. A primary driver characteristic that can be studied in this regard is driver age, especially since driver- related cognitive and physiological variables including reaction time, visual acuity, and attention - sharing capacity correlate with age. Using young and older drivers as a "design" driver may yield lower and/or upper limits of parameters in EBB and tri vision sign variables. For example, since older drivers have greater sensitivity to glare than do younger drivers, including older drivers in research on sign glare is important when determining limits to sign luminance. • Young Drivers . The literature review conducted in Task 2 showed that young drivers are slower to detect traffic hazards, especially if the hazard is distant or emerging, and that young driver "situation awareness" of the roadway is less integrated and less sensitive to context. Of particular importance to the present report are indications that young drivers may have difficulty handling distracting events that compete for attention, whether the source is in- vehicle or external to the vehicle. Research Question — Young Drivers: Research should determine whether young drivers are more likely to demonstrate degraded driving performance in the presence of EBBS 28 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction and tri- vision signs and if so, to what extent. This factor could be present in most, if not all, of the studies described above. • Older Drivers . Cognitive and visual deficits increase the difficulty of the driving task for older individuals. For example, the speed of visual processing and the capacity to allocate attention in divided attention tasks decline with age. Yet, each of these attributes underlies driving performance. Research on the older driver should focus on their driving performance in comparison to other age groups when they are exposed to EBBs and tri- vision signs in roadway configurations of higher driving task difficulty. Research Question — Older Drivers: Research should determine whether older drivers are more likely to demonstrate degraded driving performance in the presence of EBBs and tri- vision signs and if so, to what extent. This factor could be present in most, if not all, of the studies described above. 4.5 Other Potential Driver Distractions In the literature review, research was presented on other types of stimuli that may distract a driver. These are the cellular telephone and the in- vehicle information display. • Although research in cellular telephone and in- vehicle information displays does not currently appear to have direct application to EBBs or tri-vision signs, these analyses are ongoing and may still provide insights into the nature of driver distraction, the definition of distraction thresholds and approaches to minimizing distraction for safe driving. Research Question — Monitoring of Other Driver Distraction Research: Continue to follow the results of research on driver distraction, particularly in the area of cellular telephones and in- vehicle information displays to determine what may be learned, either in general principles or specific information, that is applicable to addressing potential distractibility from EBBs and/or tri-vision signs. Will the peripheral distraction task be a useful tool in assessing the distractibility of stimuli external to the vehicle? What modifications need to be made to make it applicable for both research and perhaps, even, evaluation of proposed billboards? 4.6 Future Research A wide range of research questions for EBB and tri- vision signs has been addressed above. The general approach to these issues has been to establish under which conditions, if any, EBBs and tri-vision signs are most likely to affect driving safety. The area for which the most potentially applicable research is currently available is legibility. Other areas such as length of exposure time have received attention through state regulation. Some research areas such as whether motion in a display has any potential safety effect on driving seem to have received practically no attention. Since there are several potential research areas, approaches to efficiency in the analyses are useful. When planning future research on EBB and tri-vision sign safety questions, criteria may be developed that prioritize the questions. Such criteria might include a determination of which questions are the most urgent, the availability of existing field data for analysis, and the possibility of performing laboratory research. A second approach examines the possibility of combining research questions in one study. Thus, after prioritization, it could be useful to determine which issues should be investigated independently versus in an integrated manner. 29 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 4.7 Research Methods This section briefly describes several research methods that may be applicable for the candidate research topics. • Documentation Analysis. Two variations of this method are described. In the Before and After method, data (e.g., crashes) from a site without an EBB or tri vision sign are compared to the data from the site after sign installation. If the latter number of crashes was substantially greater than the former, and there are no other significant changes to the site (i.e., change in volume, average speed, new construction, etc.) during the comparison times, then one can argue that the sign was associated with increased crashes. A variation of this approach compares the site of interest to a control site during the same period. This method compares data from an EBB or tri- vision sign site to data at a comparable, control site without a sign. • Field Study. Field studies normally have observers collect data on driver and vehicle behavior at the site(s) instead of performing an analysis of documentation. If there were a substantial difference in quantity of behaviors, there would again be reason to argue that the EBB was associated with changed driver behavior. When this type of study is compared to the study of documentation, this study usually has more controlled conditions of observation as well as the advantage of examining more behaviors (e.g., swerving, braking) than just crashes. The analysis of documentation, however, is more likely to provide a greater number of crashes since the data collection period is likely to be longer. • Test Track. Another method shares some of the advantages of a field as well as a laboratory study. A simulation of infrastructure elements such as pavement and signs is avoided. The dynamics of the vehicle is not a problem. In addition experimenter can control instructions to the driver, provide signs and objects of any design, repeat trials, and control presentation of stimuli. The use of a test vehicle in this situation could avoid crashes with other cars while allowing observation and documentation of lane keeping, speed, and other behaviors. • Simulation. A laboratory study allows the researcher to examine specific conditions by simulating scenarios with a combination of hardware and software. The fidelity of the simulation can vary depending on the kind of research question being asked. The fidelity will also depend on the type of apparatus available to study the research question. Lane deviation, change in speed, and crashes can be measured in the laboratory. An advantage of the laboratory is the capability to provide a realistic context for the study that does not expose the participant to actual danger. Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 5 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY The following annotated bibliography summarizes three research papers on the possible distraction effects of systems that are located inside the vehicle. The references cited and summarized herein represent a sample of the extensive research literature on possible driver distraction from in- vehicle systems. This section briefly describes several studies that were evaluated in the present research effort, but were not included in the literature review itself. 1. Gellatly, A.W., and Kleiss, J.A. (2000). "Visual Attention Demand Evaluation of Conventional and Multifunction In- vehicle Information Systems." In: Proceedings of the IEA 2000 /HFES 2000 Congress. Joint International Ergonomics Association 14 Triennial Congress and Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting July 29, 2000 - August 4, 2000. This paper presents the results of a study of driver responses to executing conventional in- vehicle tasks and to operating a novel re- configurable, multifunction information system inside the vehicle. Six older and six younger drivers operated an instrumented test vehicle along a two -lane divided highway. Visual scanning behavior and driving task performance were measured while the research participants executed conventional tasks (e.g., climate control, audio control, and cellular telephone use) and advanced /future tasks (e.g., e-mail, navigation, audio, voice and video communications). The results showed that drivers completed all the tasks by means of a series of 1 -1.5 sec glances to the in- vehicle display /control systems. Mean glance frequency increased linearly with mean task completion time, but mean glance duration remained constant over the range of mean task times observed. Mean task completion times were about twice as long for the re- configurable, multifunction information system as for the conventional in- vehicle devices. Certain driving task variables were correlated with mean task completion time. Both speed variability and lane variability (peak lateral acceleration) increased linearly as a function of mean task completion time. Although variability within the driving lane increased with task time, lane departure did not. Thus the research participants tended to stay in the lane, but exhibited more aggressive lateral position adjustments as the in- vehicle tasks became more complex and took longer. Overall, the data revealed a decrement in driving performance as the in-vehicle tasks took more time to complete. Therefore one design goal for any in- vehicle display /control device should be to minimize overall task completion time. 2. Rockwell, T.H. (1988). "Spare Visual Capacity in Driving — Revisited." In: A.G. Gale, M.H. Freeman, C.M. Hasleman, P Smith and S.P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles II. North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers. This paper summarizes a series of studies on in- vehicle visual sampling. The data were collected from 106 research participants in over 200 highway trips ranging in duration from 45 minutes to 1 hour. The studies measured off -road glances made by the drivers while completing a variety of in- vehicle tasks. Over 6,000 off -road glances were recorded. The in- vehicle tasks consisted of checking the speedometer, adjusting all three mirrors (left, right and rear - view), adjusting the stereo system (volume and tuning controls) and using a touch-screen CRT display. While the mean number of glances varied considerably from 1 glance to 40 glances, depending on the task, the average glance durations were extremely consistent, ranging from 1.27 to 1.42 sec for stereos and mirrors. Older drivers tended to require 20 percent more glances to execute a given command than younger drivers. Traffic density and highway geometries had a substantial effect on average glance duration. While driving in dense traffic at high speeds on curves with short 31 S , 1 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction headway distances, participants exhibited average glance durations that were 20 percent shorter for both stereo and mirror tasks. Thus glance durations are affected more by the requirements of the driving task than by the requirements of the in- vehicle task. As concerns the design of in- vehicle display /control devices, good design will be reflected more by a smaller number of glances than by shorter glances at the device. 3. Wierwille, W.G. (1993). "Visual and Manual Demands of In -car Controls and Displays." In: Smith and Solame (Eds.), Automotive Ergonomics. New York: Taylor and Francis. This chapter synthesizes a series of different studies by different researchers on the visual demands of in- vehicle tasks. Five types of tasks are defined, ranging from almost automatic manual only tasks, such as setting the directional signal lever, to complex visual -manual tasks, such as interacting with a navigational map display. A time- sharing model was developed to describe how drivers gather in- vehicle information. The model results in a driving strategy where short glances are made away from the driving task until the necessary in- vehicle information has been gathered. These in- vehicle glances tend to be between 1.0 and 1.6 sec. After each glance, the driver returns to the visual driving task. Compensatory visual sampling strategies have been demonstrated in studies where an apparatus periodically blocked the driver's forward view of the road for brief periods. In addition, forward view of the road increases with increasing traffic, a more difficult roadway or strong crosswinds. As concerns the older driving population, for a given in- vehicle task, single glance times and the number of glances into the vehicle both increase with age. The transition time between the forward view and the in- vehicle view also increases with age. Several remedies are suggested to minimize the visual load of in- vehicle tasks. These include the use of heads -up displays, virtual image displays and displays located near the top of the vehicle instrument panel. Other remedies include the use of auditory displays and training on improved visual sampling techniques. Designers of in- vehicle displays and controls are urged to minimize the demands of in- vehicle tasks. Some suggestions include avoiding clutter and improving labels and legends. Two areas are identified where future research is needed: 1) expansion and refinement of models of in- vehicle task performance and 2) better guidelines for in- vehicle task communications. s Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction APPENDIX A: EXAMPLES OF ELECTRONIC BILLBOARDS Incandescent Light Sign 0006 000 0 ti roil 3 0 e a e 000o 0000 0 Incandescent Light Sign 41 . .� », a ,r. LED Sign Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Tri vision Signs Video Color LED Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction APPENDIX B: OUTDOOR ADVERTISING: STANDARD DEFINITION Most states define the term "sign" using the following standard definition. States will vary specific wording, but this definition reflects the concept most states use. "Sign" means any outdoor advertising sign, display, device, notice, figure, painting, drawing, message, placard, poster, billboard or other thing which is designed, intended or used to advertise or inform any part of the advertising or informative contents of which is visible from any place on the main - traveled way or any portion of an interstate highway or primary highway." Defmition exceptions: Some states use the term "outdoor advertising device." California adds "light or other thing." Colorado adds "or other contrivance." Florida — sign includes "any combination of structure and message." Idaho adds "light device." Massachusetts adds "whether fixed or movable." As was noted in the literature review, few states define the term "electronic billboard." However, the definition above, with the catchall phrase "or other thing" appears broad enough to include electronic billboards in the standard definition of the term "sign." Statutory Prohibitions: The following list summarizes the statutory prohibitions identified during the review of state statutes and regulations. These prohibitions appear to apply to the standard "sign" as defined above, and are not directly targeted towards electronic billboards. • Moving Parts/Animation: Eleven states prohibit moving or animated parts in signs, unless the signs are a public service announcement. A few states make an exception for movement related to the changing of a sign. • Red/Flashing Lights: Thirty-six states prohibit signs that include a red, flashing, intermittent, or moving light, unless it is a public service display. Glare: Thirty -six states prohibit signs that are not sufficiently shielded to prevent beams or rays of light from causing a glare or vision impairment that affects driver vision. • Interfering with Traffic Control Devices: Fifteen states include language prohibiting the placement of signs that obscure or interfere with TCDs. Twenty -nine states include language that prohibits signs that are illuminated in such a way as to obscure or interfere with TCDs. • Timing Limit Twelve states include some type of timing limit for the viewing of signs. Of these, only eight apply to EBBs or other types of signs with changing messages. • Sign spacing: Twenty-nine states include spacing requirements for location of signs on interstate or primary highway systems. Twenty -one include similar limits on sign spacing along other state highways. Twenty-two include limits on the spacing of directional signs along interstate or primary highway systems. 35 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction • Language Usage: A number of states prohibit the use of wording that implies a traffic control or highway emergency (for example, use of the word "Stop "). Several states also prohibit the use of TCD signs or symbols (such as the eight -sided stop sign) in signs. Potential Issues: Based on this review of state statutes, the following are issues that embody the statutory and regulatory prohibitions adopted by states for conventional signs, and that may pertain to EBBs: • Red, flashing, intermittent or moving lights, • Glare, • Use of TCD symbols and words, • Illuminated or placement interfering with a TCD, • Spacing, and • Timing Limits. Of the potential issues, timing limits may be the one issue where additional or expanded research would have the most significant benefit. The results of the state statutory review are shown in Appendix C. Research Review APPENDIX C: of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction RESULTS OF STATE STATUTORY REVIEW Prohibitions on Signs... Alabama ...that are so illuminated as to obscure or interfere with traffic control devices Yes Alaska Arizona Arkansas Californ Colorado NOTE: prohibits signs which have a moveable advertising face permitting any change in sign content or message Delaware Florida NOTE: Pro . signs with moving or animated parts unless certain conditions are niet State Statutory References to Possible "Guidelines" ...with red, flashing, intermittent, or moving lights, unless it is a public service display Yes Yes Yes Yes ...that are not sufficiently shielded to prevent beams or rays of light from causing a glare or vision impairment that affects driver vision Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ...that are placed so as to obscure or interfere with traffic control devices Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ...located on interstate or primary highway outside of zoning authority of incorporated cities within 500 ft of an interchange or intersection at grade or safety roadside rest area Yes Yes Yes Yes 1500 ft on interstate 1000 ft on federal aid primary highway ...other state highway says - 300 ft limit Yes ...directional signs may not be located within 200 ft of an interstate, or intersection at grade along the interstate system or other freeway, or within 2000 ft of a rest or scenic area or parkland Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ...timing limit 4 sec - message display, 1 sec- message change Conditions: Message fixed for at least 10 sec, message changed in 3 sec L_ less, 5,000 ft spacing, default freezing sign if malfuriction occurs 37 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction Hawaii Idaho NOTE: adds in blue lights Illinois Iowa NOTE: Prohibits animated or moving parts in a sign Indiana NOTE: Prohibits animated or moving parts Kansas Kentucky Prohibits animation and movement except for movement on and off of the sign Louisiana NOTE: Statute obtained does not have information on restrictions Maine Michigan Massachusetts NOTE: Prohibitions appear to be adopted by reference incorporating federal regulations Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes between displays on interstate or primary highway or public /scenic areas 1000 ft from an interchange or rest area Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Exposure time is long enough at maximum speed limit for sign message to be readable and comprehensible Tri- vision signs — 4 sec minimum display, two sec for transition Total message displayed within 10 sec, with each segment having a display time of 2 sec including change time Signs must be readily viewed for a time of 5 sec from the roadway at posted speed limit Not more than 3 rotating or alternate messages may be displayed on a sign 38 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction nnesuta Mississippi Montana NOTE: State n o language o hibition trictions. Nebraska New Mexico NOTE: Prohibits animation or moving parts New Jersey, NOTE: Prohibits animation and moving parts New York NOTE: Prohibits animation or moving parts except for public service announcement. North Carolina Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes350 ft Yes Yes Yes Minimum display f6 sec, chance inte3 Minimum message time, 4 s ee Maximum change me, 2 sec Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 39 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction North Dakota Ohio NOTE: No statutory information obtained Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island Note: Prohibits animation and moving parts South Carolina Tennessee Texas NOTE: No statutory literature included in file Vermont Virginia Washington NOTE: Prohibits moving parts and animation Washington, DC West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Total of 42 states Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ycs Ycs Yes Yes Yes 36 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Ycs Yes Yes Yes Yes 36 Yes Yes Yes Yes 15 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 29 Yes Yes Yes, 750 ft Yes Yes 1000 ft Yes Yes Yes Yes 28 Yes Yes Yes 250 ft Yes Yes 500 ft Yes Yes Yes 21 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 22 Viewing time 5 sec from roadside when traveling at speed limit If sign change exceed 4 sec, turn sign off during change Change time of 5 sec max without written approval NOTE: Ten (10) states prohibit animation or moving parts except on public service announcements. 40 a * • r Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction REFERENCES 1. Craford, M, Holonyak, N., and Kish, F , Jr. (2001). "In Pursuit of the Ultimate Lamp." Scientific American, 284, pp. 62 -67. 2. Arkansas Highway Department (1967). Regulations for Control of Outdoor Advertising Policy. Little Rock, Arkansas Highway Department. 3. Wachtel, J. and Netherton, R. (1980). Safety and Environmental Design Considerations in the Use of Commercial Electronic Variable- Message Signage. Report No. FHWA- RD -80- 051. Washington, D.C: Federal Highway Administration. 4. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (1994). Milwaukee County Stadium Variable Message Sign Study. Wisconsin, USA: Internal Report, Wisconsin Department of Transportation. 5. Curriden, M. (2000). "Juries That Take Action Beyond the Law Have Deep Roots." The Dallas Morning News. Obtained from the World Wide Web: http: / /www.dallasnews .com/juries /101414,jurytwo 25buss.html 6. Treat, J.R., Tumbas, N.S., McDonald, S.T., Shinar, D., Hume, R.D., Mayer, R.E., Stanisfer, R.L., and Castellan, N.J. (1979). Tri -Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 7. Wang, J., Knipling, R. and Goodman, M. (2000). "The Role of Driver Inattention in Crashes: New Statistics from the 1995 Crashworthiness Data System." Obtained from the August 2000 Driver Distraction Internet Forum sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on the World Wide Web. 8. Dornheim, M.A. (2000). "Crew Distractions Emerge as New Safety Focus." Aviation Week and Space Technology, 153(3), pp. 58 -60. 9. Hughes, P.K. and Cole, B.L. (1986). "What Attracts Attention When Driving ?" Ergonomics, 29(3), pp. 377 -391. 10. Cole, G.L. and Hughes, P.K. (1984). "A Field Trial of Attention and Search Conspicuity." Human Factors, 26(3), pp. 299 -313. 11. Theeuwes, J. (1996). "Visual Search at Intersections: An Eye - Movement Analysis." In: A.G. Gale, I. Brown, C. Haslegrave, and S. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in Vehicles: VI. New York: North Holland Press, Elsevier Science Publishers. 12. Akagi, Y., Seo, T, and Motoda, Y. (1996). "Influence of Visual Environments on Visibility of Traffic Signs." Transportation Research Record, No. 1553, pp 52 -58. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 13. Luoma, J. (1988). "Drivers' Eye Fixations and Perceptions." In: A.G. Gale, M. H. Freeman, C.M. Hasleman, P. Smith, and S.P.Taylor, (Eds 14. Rahimi, M., Briggs, R. and Thorn, D. (1990). "A Field Evaluation of Driver Eye and Head Movement Strategies toward Environmental Targets and. Distractors." Applied Ergonomics, 21(4), pp. 267 -274. 15. Garvey, P.M. and Mace, D.J. (1996). Changeable Message Sign Visibility. Report No. FHWA -RD -94 -077. Washington, D.C: Federal Highway Administration. 41 Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 16. Kuhn, B.T, Garvey, P. and Pietrucha, K.M. (1997). "Model Guidelines for Visibility of Orr Premise Advertisement Signs." Transportation Research Record, No. 1605, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 17. Kuhn, B.T. (1999). "The Impact of Illumination on Typical On-Premise Sign Visibility." ITE Journal, 4, p. 64. 18. Claus, R.J., and Claus, K.E. (1971). Visual Environment: Sight, Sign and By -Law. New York: The MacMillan Company. 19. McNees, R.W., and Messer, C.J. (1981). Evaluating Urban Freeway Guide Signing. Report No. FHWA/TX- 81/5 +220 -3, Washington D.C: Federal Highway Administration. 20. Transportation Research Board (1990). Safety Research for a Changing Highway Environment. Publication No. ISBN 0- 309 - 05056 -1, SR 229. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press. 21. Barr, R.A., and Eberhard, J.W. (1991). "Special Issue Preface." Human Factors, 33(5), pp. 497 -498. 22. Waller, P.F. (1991). "The Older Driver." Human Factors, 3(5), pp. 499 -505. 23. Cerrelli, E. (1989). Older Drivers, the Age Factor in Traffic Safety. Publication No. DOT - HS- 807 -402, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 24. Maleck, T.L. and Hummer, J.E. (1986). "Driver Age and Highway Safety." Transportation Research Record, No. 1059, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 25. National Research Council (1988). Transportation in an Aging Society (Vols.] and 2). Washington, DC: Transportation Safety Board, National Academy Press. 26. Ball, K., and Owsely, C. (1993). "The Useful Field of View Test: A New Technique for Evaluating Age - Related Declines in Visual Function." Journal of American Optometric Association, 64(1), pp. 71 -79. 27. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1993). Addressing the Safety Issues Related to Younger and Older Drivers: A Report to Congress. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 28. Lerner, N.D., Tornow, C. E., Freedman, M., Llaneras, R.E., Rabinovich, B.A., Steinberg, G.V. In press. Preliminary Investigations of Highway Design Countermeasures to Aid Drivers with Limited Experience: Literature Review and Crash Data Analysis. FHWA -RD- 99-XXX Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. 29. Decina, L.E., Gish, K.W., Staplin, L. and Kirchner, A.H. (1996). Feasibility of New Simulation Technology to Train Novice Drivers. Publication No. DTNH22 -95 -C- 05104, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 30. Mourant, R.R., Rockwell, T.H., and Rackoff, N.J. (1969). "Drivers' Eye Movements and Visual Workload." Highway Research Record, No. 292., Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Research Review of Potential Safety Effects of Electronic Billboards on Driver Attention and Distraction 31. Miltenburg, P.G.M. and Kuiken, M.J. (1991). "The Effect of Driving Experience on Visual Search Strategies." In: M.J. Kuiken and J.A. Groeger, (Eds.), Feedback Requirements and Performance Differences of Drivers. Haren, the Netherlands: Traffic Research Centre, University of Groningen. 32. Cain, A., and Burris, M. (1999). Investigations of the Use of Mobile Phones While Driving. Florida, USA: Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida. 33. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (1997). Traffic Safety Facts 1996: Young Drivers. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 34. Redelmeier, D. A. and Ticshirani, R. J. (1997). "Association between Cellular- Telephone Calls and Motor Vehicle Collisions." The New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453- 458. 35. Violanti, J.M. (1996). "Cellular Phones and Fatal Traffic Collisions." Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30(4), pp. 519 -524. 36. McKnight, J., and McKnight, A.S. (1991). The Effect of Cellular Phone Use Upon Driver Attention. Landover, MD: National Public Services Research Institute. 37. Wierwille, W.W. and Tijerina, L (1998). "Modeling the Relationship between Driver In- Vehicle Visual Demands and Accident Occurrence." In: A.G. Gale, I. Brown, C. Haslegrave and S.P. 38. Olsson, S. and Bums, P.C. (2000). "Measuring Driver Visual Distraction with a Peripheral Detection Task." Obtained from August 2000 The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Driver Distraction Internet Forum on the World Wide Web. 39. Federal Highway Administration (2000). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. StGN T CJ� Campus Business Center �I r 3.759 9th Ave. S.F.ederal Way, WA 98003 King Co. : 1253) 874 -0746 Pierce Co..: (253) 952 -6559 ,Fax:1253) .838 - ,1522 Sign; t ; Electrical Eo it cactcrs, • Revisions: Yes No Designer. Jewn Tgdor Selesmen:nryon T•l• File Name: Jt Ioeterhigh enpnroal Location: Foster High School Address: 4242 South 144th M Tukwila, WA 98168 Late: 94/19/09 Client Approval: Date: RECEIVED ' APR 2 5 2006 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOB NAME :: FOSTER SCHOOL FOSTER HIGH CHOOL Colors shown In this representation are not necessarily the true colors used on the final product This design presentation is the property of Sign -Tech Electric LLC. ® Sign -Tech Electric 2003 All rights to use. alter, or reproduce are prohibited without written permission. • • SIIWN TEC 61.6_, Campus Business Center r 33759 9th Ave. S 'Federal , Way, WA 98003 King Co.: (253) 874 -0746 Pierce Co.: (253) 952 -6559 Fax: ,(253) .838 -1.522 Sign, 6, Electrical Cpn•trsctQrs Qty (1) Double sided cabinet sign with LED message center. (A) Internal lit aluminum cabinet with poly carb faces and translucent vinyl graphics. Cabinet Painted black. (B) 2 led 19mm monochrome message centers (C) Bolt plate. Existing bolt plate may be used if existing pole is used. Bolt plate painted Pantone Reflex Blue. (D) Steel pipe. Existing pipe may be used. Steel pipe painted Pantone - Reflex Blue. (E) Aluminum access panel for service maintanace y lnyi Colors: Silver Gray PMS #877 Blue PMS #2945 ® Black Revisions: Yes L:1 No❑ Designer Jason War Salem an•HrynnTAl File Name: it fcsnrhle 4pl „a.d Landon: Fe r Nigh School Addren• 4242 Routh 144th Rt Tukwila, WA 99168 Date: 34/19195 (A) (B) (C) (D) Client Approval. Date: SCALE: 3/8 " =1' COMMUNITY JOB NAME: DEVELOPBOENT FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL RECEIVED PR 2 5 2006 2' Colors shown in this representation are not necessarily the true colors used an the final product. This design presentation Is the property of Sign -Tech Electric LLC. ® Sign -Tech Electric 2003 All lights to use, altar, or reproduce are prohibited without written permission. • • • Sign code public hearing To Whom It May Concern:: We would attend this public hearing, concerning the reader - board/new message sign at Foster High School. But our daughter & husband are here to celebrate their 25 wedding anniversary and that's where we are tonight. Concerning the issue of whether to allow Tukwila School District to place an electronic changing message sign at the corner of 144 & 42 Ave So....We could support the planning commission recommendation of option 3B, if the following was part of the use requirement: 3B in the second paragraph states the following: The term " public facility" is defined in TMC 19.08.175 to mean any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school ... ...... If these public facilities provide a service to the general public; then use of the sign should also be extended to public information, concerning the schools in the district, events in the city or at the community center; not just school information. Such as: Tukwila Days, Night Out Against Crime, any function held in the auditorium that is open to the public, the Farmer's Market, events at the community center that are of interest to the general public..... 90% of the population of Tukwila passes through the intersection of 144 & 42 Ave So., at lease once during a given week, if not twice. What better place to advertise events in our town. We are always talking about wanting public participation... this sign could make a difference if it was scheduled properly. One of the original arguments supporting the placement of the original sign was -- -it could be used to inform the community about all events, not just school sponsored events. Some years it happened and other years it didn't. Some years, it depended how much of a pest you were. We don't support anything flashing, glaring, with loud colors that stop traffic, just a message board that informs our citizens of what's happening in our schools and in our town. Thank you for your attention, Paul & Betty Gully 14, it Tukwila City Council Agenda *to � z REGU • 1,I:4 REGULAR MEETING eit, ; �► , . Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Councilmembers: • Joe Duffie • Joan Hernandez '4k �..... O Rhonda Be , Ci Administrator { �9�8 �' � P am Car • Jim Haggerton Dennis Robertson, Council Presiden < • Pamela Linder • Verna Griffin Monday, August 7, 2006; 7:00 PM • Ord # 2126 • Res #1610 1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE / ROLL CALL 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS a. "A Roof Over Every Bed in King County"; Bill Block, Project Director, Committee to End Homelessness, King County (15 minutes). b. Tukwila Pon Report presentation; Christine Harrin • on, DCI3 Intern (15 minutes). 3. CITIZEN COMMENT At this time, you are invited to continent on items not included on this agenda. To comment on an item listed on this agenda, • lease save our comments until the issue is .resented for discussion. 4. CONSENT AGENDA 1 1 a. Approval of minutes: 7/17/06 (Regular) and 7/24/06 (Special). b. Approval of vouchers. c. Final acceptance of Foster Golf Links -- Irrigation System Filter Pg.3 Replacement Project with Golf Pumping Services; authorize release of retainage subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures (total contract cost: $37,655.68). d. Accept turnover of public infrastructure at Cascade Glen a /k /a Pg.9 Hillside Homes (value of transferred assets from developer to the Ci is $356,291.18). 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Development Agreement with Fountain Park LLC covering Pg.21 exchange of certain parcels of property between Fountain Park and the City of Tukwila. Fountain Park proposed a residential mixed- use development of approximately 300 units with approximately 5,000 square feet of retail space. The proposed project is located just south of 1-405 between the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern railroad tracks and just north of Longacres Way (see 7/24/06 COW). b. An ordinance modifying TMC Title 19 regarding signs. The Pg.23 proposed modifications will permit public facilities in the City to construct and o . erate chane ; : messa: e si: (. 1 1 1 BUSINESS a. Authorize the Mayor to sign a Developer's Agreement between (Pg.21) Fountain Park and the City of Tukwila that includes an exchange of certain parcels of property and development of a residential mixed- use project known as Tukwila Station (see 7/24106 COW) (see item 5.a. above). i (Continued) Tukwila City Council Agenda REGULAR MEETING + onday, August 7, 2006 age < 2 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS (Continued) 7. NEW BUSINESS 8. REPORTS 9. MISCELLANEOUS 10. EXECUTIVE SESSION 11. ADJOURNMENT b. An ordinance modifying TMC Title 19 to permit public facilities in the City to construct and operate changing message signs (see item 5.b. above). c. An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2068 codified at TMC 2.95 Pg.33 relating to prohibited conduct and the co saint process. a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental b. City Council d. City Attorney Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office 206433.1800f1'DD 206.248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila. and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audi taped. (Pg.23) clear Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elec Council meetings held on theist and 3, in the form of formal motions, adoptin Regular Council meetings. Committee of the Who Nie president is elected by the Co one-year term. Committee u Issues discussed are forwards At each Council meeting citizen not included on the agenda dun minutes. Special Meet same as those • of Re xec Sessions n ray ersonnel matters. COUN e scheduled on the 5th called at is Hearings are required by w bef the Council can take a moment rest such as land- use laws, annetio rezone rusts, public safety ices, etc e Tukwila Municipal Code states the foU wing guidelines for Public Hearings: bl la. he Whole otheRe After each sp eaker respond to the question, After the Public Heat further public testimony. Co Counc 1. 1 tte proponent 2. 'The opponent is then allowed 15 r 3. Each side is then allowed 5 mu3uty 4. Citizens who wish to address the secon time until everyone wi shix HOW TO TESTI Council r ed to info pok t by .the r M onday of resolutions and o re witn pr E GS :ohday of the month unless prior public notification � tembejrs are elected for a fou -year term. The Co presid at all Committee cif the Whole meetings ing are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7 :r" ;oil me:ti tg for official action. GENERAL INFO R ATION ven the opportunity to' ad CTIZENS COMMENTS Plea PUBLIC HE.►N xou r -yeas °nth at 7: term, presides at all Regular tl p,itn Official Council action of ordinances can only be taken at Gaon or P. rra the Council on items that limit your comments to fi ° " public not ce. Procedures followed axe the ncil of pending legal action, financial, or ecting the public Section 2.04.150 d is allowed 15 minutes fora presentation. min utes to make a presentation. for rebut . Council. may .speak f or 5 i utes each. No one may speak a tg m speak has spoken. the Council may question the speaker.. Each spe�� ca iy not engage in fi er debate at this tune. �e Council ma d tion may be taken at s the. issue among themselves without his time or postponed to another date. If you would like to address Iy for the record. Please co mm ents to five minutes. The immediate action on co mxn+ New Business. No Council mee is given. p lease go to the podium and state your name and address observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to takke ! eived until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under are 3 :AS NUMBER: V � ; - L.% -7 1 \GENDA ITEM TITLE Sign Code Revisions CATEGORY SPQNSOR SPONSOR'S SUMMARY EXPENDITURE REQUIRED $N /A Fund Source: N/A Comments: N/A 7/24 TG.,' DAT 8/07/06 8/07/06 8/07/06 Go UNCIJI A GENDA SYNOFSIS Initials Mayor's review o uncil review 08 07 06 .1 BM for S Meeting Date 24 06 Prepared by 'BM for SL ITEM INFORMATION::, I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 7/24/06 ITEM NO. 5 . . b fv - b -- ® Discussion ®Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Bid Award ® Public Hearing 0 Other Mtg Date 7/24 Mtg Date 8/7/06 Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 8/7/06 Mtg Date ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ Adm Svcs ® DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ Legal ❑ P&R. ❑ Police ❑ PW The Tukwila School District has requested that the City's sign code be modified to permit changing message displays. The City's sign code currently bans any sign that changes content more than once every 24- hours. The proposed draft ordinance would permit public facilities to have changing message displays that change content no more than once every 10 seconds. WED BY ® COW Mtg. /Z/ CA &P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. DATE: 4/25/06 CAP, 7/24/06 COW ❑ Transportation Cmte Planning Comm. RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Set a date for a public hearing. COMMITTEE CAP referred the matter to the Planning Commission. var�nir. ..- ,.. v..r,. rm^i'v:- rrrwr r1 AMOUNT BUDGETED $N /A APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $N /A Discussion of draft ordinance, set a date for a public hearing. Memo from DCD Draft Ordinance orginally submitted to Council on July 24, 2006 Draft Ordinance reflecting changes proposed by Council at July 24, 2006 (2 3 • City of Tukiila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director TO: Mayor City Council FROM: Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner RE: Changing Message Signs Public Facilities DATE: August 2, 2006 On July 24, 2006, Planning Staff presented a draft ordinance to the City Council. The draft ordinance was regarding changing message signs at public facilities. The Council directed staff to add additional language and to present an additional draft of the ordinance at the August 7, 2006 meeting. Staff has provided the Council with the original draft and a revised draft reflecting Council direction to staff at the July 24, 2006 meeting. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor �n� A ?1_2AA PROPOSED VERSION #1 19.04.020 Purposes LrOlC j i :ru AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1274, 2019 AND 2096, AS CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19, "SIGN CODE," TO EXPAND 1 THE PURPOSES OF THE SIGN CODE, AND TO CREATE ADDITIONAL SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES; ESTABLISHIHNG A SUNSET PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILTTY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide public agencies sign options to allow them to communicate with members of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to regulate certain types of signage located at public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Sign Code by addressing signage in certain zones where signs are typically not found; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase public safety and minimize driver distractions; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2006 and June 22, 2006 the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Sign Code; and on June 22, 2006 adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2006, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA., WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1274 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.04.020, "General Provisions: Purposes, is hereby amended to read as follows: The purposes of this code are 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly, and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. 2. To provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. CADocuments and Settings \All Users\Desktop \ Kelly \ MSDATA \ Ordinances \ Sign Code.doc BM•.lm 717/2006 Page 1 of 3 - 1 3. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. 4. To assure that the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the,provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulation. SectiFln 2. Ordinance Nos. 1274, 2019 §1, and 2096 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.08.030, "Definitions: Animated Sign," are hereby amended to read as follows: "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or temperature, or ` those permitted under TMC 19.32.300, shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered animated signs. Section 3. TMC Chapter 19.32, "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories," is hereby amended to include additional sign regulations for public facilities, as follows: 19.32.300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities that meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.300 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided that the following criteria is also met 1; The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. may not 2. The image must appear and disappear as one ia flashes image light, f appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7AM to 10PM. B. Notice of understanding: Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Director of the Department of Amen signed by appropriate Community Development, si ed b the a r ate manager/ administrator, which notes understanding of the above requirements and an assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in TMC 19.32.300(A)(1-3). C. Order of Removal: The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way that violates the provisions of this chapter. D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly one year from the effective date of the ordinance that adopted the code language. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must continue to comply with TMC 19.32.300(A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign, and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subject to the limitations in TMC 19.30. C: \Documents and Settings \All Users \ Desktop \ Kelly \ MSDATA \ Ordinances \ Sign Code.doc BM:Icn 7/7/2006 Page 2 of 3 Section 4. Sevexability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or uriconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF of CTY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: ■ Jane E. Cantu, C, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number C\ Documents and settings\ All Users \ Desktop \ Kelly \ MSDATA\ ordinances \Sign Code.doc fM:tior 7(//20 Page 3 of 3 PROPOSED VERSION NUMBER 2 19.04.020 Purposes Q; \Si gn \School District \RR \Version 2DOC .•••• n in07MC DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1274, 2019 AND 2096, AS CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19, "SIGN CODE," TO EXPAND THE PURPOSES OF THE SIGN CODE, AND TO CREATE ADDITIONAL SIGN k REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES; ESTABLISHIHNG A SUNSET PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide public agencies sign options to allow them to communicate with members of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to regulate certain types of signage located at public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Sign Code by addressing signage in certain zones where signs are typically not found; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase public safety and minimize driver distractions; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to provide for public safety and limit changing message signs to areas where they are not visible from streets with more than two lanes or speeds higher than 25 miles per hour; and W HEREAS, on May 25, 2006 and June 22, 2006 the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Sign Code; and on June 22, 2006 adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2006, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1274 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.04.020, "General Provisions: Purposes," is hereby amended to read as follows: The purposes of this code are: 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly, and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. Page 1 of 3 • • • • PROPOSED VERSION NUMBER 2 2. To provide sign options that qtcourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. 3. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. 4. To assure that the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulation. Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 1274, 2019 §1, and 2096 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.08.030, "Definitions: Animated Sign," are hereby amended to read as follows: "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spinl'twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, temperature, or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300, shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered animated signs. Section 3. TMC Chapter 19.32, "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories," is hereby amended to include additional sign regulations for public facilities, as follows: 19.32.300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities that meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.300 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided that the following criteria is also met: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. • 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7AM to 10PM. 4. The changing message sign must face a City street that has a speed limit no greater than 25 miles per hour and the City street has no more than two lanes. B. Notice of understanding. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Director of the Department of Community Development, signed by the appropriate manager /administrator, which notes understanding of the above requirements and an assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in TMC 19.32.300(A)(1 -3). C. Order of Removal: The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way that violates the provisions of this chapter. D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly one year from the effective date of the ordinance that adopted the code language. Any public facility that Q: \ gn\ school District\ RR \Verson 2.DOC BtvLlm 8/2/2006 Page 2 of 3 31 PROPOSED VERSION NUMBER 2 installs and operates a changing message sign must continue to comply with TMC 19.32.300(A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign, and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subject to the limitations in TMC 19.30. r i Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2006. ATTEST / AUTHENTICATED: Jane E. Cantu, CMG City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Attachments: Q:\Sign1School District \RR\ Version 2.DOC uu.u.. an nnM. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Page 3 of 3 Dated this City of Tukwila NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, August 7, 2006, beginning at 7 PM in the Council Chambers at Tukwila City Hall, 6200 Southcenter Blvd, Tukwila, Washington, to consider the following: An ordinance modifying Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Title 19 regarding "signs." The proposed modifications will permit public facilities in the City to construct and operate changing message signs. All interested persons are invited to be present to voice approval, disapproval, or opinions on this issue. Those unable to attend in person may submit written testimony to the City Clerk's office until 5 PM on the day of the hearing. Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. The City strives to accommodate people with disabilities. Reasonable accommodations are available at Public Hearings with advance notice. This notice is available in alternate formats for individuals with disabilities. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (206) 433 -1800 or TDD (206) 248 -2933 if we can be of assistance. Published: Seattle Times, July 28, 2006 day of Ja E. Cantu, C, City Clerk 2006. wl`�' wq , Tukwila City Council Agenda ' o: `� ! \ ❖ •COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE • ��� ei 0i Y,. J i \ `. =+' Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Councilmembers: • Joe Duffie • Joan Hernandez 4 *I * Rhonda Berry, City Administrator • Pam Carter • Jim Haggerton ..908 " Dennis Robertson, Council President • Pamela Linder • Verna Griffin Monday, July 24, 2006; 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS D Introduction of new IT employee: Scott Kirby, Web Technician D Domestic Violence Walkathon (15 minutes): • Evie Boykfzn, Human Services Manager • Kerry Annette Wade, Event Co -Chair • Trisha Blo'mquist, Event Co -Chair > Coscomm International; Mary Miotke, IT Manager D Quarterly Financial Review; Kevin Fuhrer, Finance Director D A proclamation designating Tuesday, August 1, 2006 as: Pg.3 "Night Out Against Crime in Tukwila" 3. CITIZEN COMMENT At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda. To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is presented for discussion. 1 4. SPECIAL ISSUES a. Sign Code revisions. Pg.5 b. Tukwila Station Development Agreement proposal Pg.29 (pamphlet attached separately). 5. REPORTS a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental b. City Council d. City Attorney 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING • SPECIAL MEETING ❖ • Ord #2126 • Res #1610 1. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL 2. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of vouchers. L�I G Qj 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS An ordinance amending the Sign Code to expand the purposes of the Sign Code, and to create additional sign regulations for public facilities (see 4.a. above). 4. ADJOURNMENT T..1...s:1, C i..s Un11 is •.r1.43u1n1.,... *1-am • 1 Y 1 (L-C Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office 206 - 433- 1800/TDD 206 -248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. HOW TO TESTIFY If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business. ,COUNCIL MEETINGS No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given. Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the form of formal motions, adopting‘of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular Council meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings - Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council president is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m. Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action. GENERAL INFORMATION At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to five minutes. Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as those used in Regular Council meetings. Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel matters. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action of matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings: 1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation. 2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken. 5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker c respond to the question, but may not engage in further debate at this time. 6. After the Public Hearing is closed, the Council may discuss the issue among themselves without further public testimony. Council action may be taken at this time or postponed to another date. CAS NUMBER: AGENDA ITEM TITLE SPONSOR SPONSOR'S SUMMARY BY MTG. DATE 7/24 ❑ COW Mtg. Utilities Cmte DATE: 4/25/06 EXPENDITURE REQUIRED $N /A Fund Source: N/A Comments: N/A c(0 - 017 Rc C ' 4 t 406$ X4 Go UNC1y, AGENDA SYNOPSIS Prepared by BM for S Meetiig Date 07/24/06 Council review • CA&P Cmte Arts Comm. Initials ITEM INFORMATION I ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 7/10/06 COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE Sign Code Revisions ` 1 1 CATEGORY ® Discussion ❑ Motion D Resolution ❑ Ordinance 1 ❑ Bid Award ID Public Hearing ❑ Other M Date M Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date Mtg Date 7/24 Mfg Date t 8 � [� Council ❑ Mayor ❑ Adm Svcs ® DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fin ❑ Legal ❑ PeR ❑ Police ❑ PW The Tukwila School District has requested that the City's sign code be modified to permit changing message displays. The City's sign code currently bans any sign that changes content more than once every 24- hours. The proposed draft ordinance would permit public facilities to have changing message displays that change content no more than once every 10 seconds. F&S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte Parks Comm. ® Planning Comm. 5/2.5/06 & 6/22/06 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Set a date for a public hearing. ComisAnTEE CAP referred the matter to the Planning Commission. AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $N /A $N /A RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION TG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 7/24 Staff Report 7/24 Draft Ordinance 7/24 Community Affairs and Parks Minutes from the April 25, 2006 Meeting 7/24 Planning Commission Minutes from May Meeting 7/24 DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes from the Rune Meeting. ITEM No. City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Committee of the Whole Staff Report FROM: RE: DATE: July 19, 2006 Steve Lancaster, Director Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner Changing Message Signs Issue The City has been approached by the Tukwila School District to amend Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) to permit signs which change more frequently than once every 24- hours. The School District proposes to install an electronic message center at Foster High School. Planning Staff briefed Community Affairs and Parks (CAP) on April 25, 2006. CAP referred the matter to the Planning Commission and on May 25, 2006 the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing. On June 22, 2006, the Planning Commission closed the Public Hearing and made a recommendation to the Council. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director Analysis of Existing Code Title 19 of the TMC regulates all types of signage in the City. Unless specifically listed as exempted, a sign permit is required for all types of signs that are discemable from adjacent properties and the City's rights of way (TMC 19.12.010). Any permanent signs, either freestanding or wall sign are required to have a sign permit. In all commercial and industrial zones most businesses, if they qualify, can have two signs. The business can choose from two wall signs or a freestanding and wall sign. The City applies different development standards for signs located in residential zones. Under TMC 19.32.080 churches, schools, public facilities, and conditional uses may have one sign for every street they front. No sign may be greater than 50 square feet in size. The sign may either be a wall or freestanding sign. Any use in the City may have an electronic message center as part of the sign. However, under TMC 19.08.030, if the sign changes more frequently than once Page 1 07/19/2006 every 24- hours, the sign would 'be considered an animated sign. Animated signs are strictly prohibited in the City (TMC 19.28.010). Tukwila School District has proposed an electronic message sign that would change copy more than onhe every 24 -hours and thus would not be permitted in the City. Discussion Tukwila's land use regulations attempt to minimize impacts within residential zones by restricting certain activities.' All schools in the City are located in and are adjacent to Low Density Residential zoned land. Schools provide a sense of community and a gathering place for City residents. Events that occur at schools provide opportunities for Tukwila residents to interact. Placing a changing message sign, such as what the School District is proposing would allow the District to advertise many events that benefit the community. The City limits many activities that occur within residential zones. Most commercial operations are excluded, home occupations are permitted but under very specific conditions, and almost all non - residential uses that may locate in residential zones require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Options Planning Staff presented these options regarding this issue to the Planning Commission at the May 25, 2006 meeting. These options are similar to the ones that were presented to CAP at the meeting on April 25, 2006. 1. No Action. The Planning Commission could choose to take no action, in which case the proposed sign, if erected, would be limited to no more than one message change per day. No flashing, blinking, scrolling or other message movement Would be allowed. The School District has indicated that they would not construct the sign under these circumstances. 2. Modify the definition of "animated sign ". The definition could be modified to allow changing messages more frequently than once every 24- hours. The Planning Commission could also consider relaxing restrictions on flashing, scrolling or other effects. Any modification to the definition would apply citywide. 3. Exemption for community event announcements. Brandon -M Page 2 07/19/2006 _ . ■•• ... _ t_ _ _. 1,2 _.:_atnntnntAI OTn DcDC T • • • 3A. Allow any otherwise permitted sign within the City to display changing messages but limit the message to public service announcements. For example, the City of Lacey allows public service signs to have changing message signs. "Public service signs in the form of changing message center signs may be permitted. However, the changing message center signs shall not be used for commercial purposes, such as to advertise a product, service, or use. Messages will be strictly limited to public information regarding activities, events, time, date, temperature, atmospheric condition and news of interest to the general public. Said signs shall be limited to the type, size, shape, and location specified for the zoning district in which said signs are located". 3B. Allow only public facilities to have changing message signs. This would allow the school district to construct a changing message sign. It would also allow for all schools, libraries, and City buildings such as City Hall and the Community Center to have a changing message sign. The term "public facility" is defined in TMC 19.08.175 to mean any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school, public library, community center, public park, govemment facility or similar use. Most of public facilities are located within residential zones. Staff has provided an attached map which shows all schools, City facilities, libraries, and utility district offices within the City. The City currently exempts changing message signs limited to "time, date and temperature" from the City's animated sign prohibition. The City could extend this exemption to also allow changing messages relating to "community events or announcements ". It should be noted that the courts have been increasingly critical of government sign regulations that base privileges or restrictions upon the content of the message. 4. Eliminate prohibition of animated signs. The Planning Commission could recommend the prohibition against animated signs for the entire City being removed. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission chose to pursue option 3B and allow public facilities to be permitted to have changing message signs. 07/19/2006 Attachment "A" is the proposed'ordinance and is in legislative format. New language that will be added is shown underline and deleted language is shown as striketlar-eugth Modify TMC 19.04.020 to add the following purpose clause: 2. The City desires to provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. Add language to the definition of animated signs (19.08.030): "Animated sign" means any sibn or portion or which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animated at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date, or temperature or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300 shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered to animated signs. Add the following section to 19.32 "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories ". TMC.19.32.300 "Additional Sian Regulations for Public Facilities" A. Signs located at public facilities which meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.080 mav use the sign as a chancing message sign, provided the following: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequentiv than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image mav not appear to flash, undulate. pulse, or portray explosions. fireworks. flashes of light. or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7am to 10pm. (Note: Any electronic sign in the City must meet the illumination and brightness levels set in TMC 19.16.035). B. Notice of Understanding 1. Anv public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Department signed by the appropriate manager /administrator that notes understanding of the above requirements Brandon -M Page 4 ,.«•:....� nictrirt\CC\COW STAFF REPORT.doc 07/19/2006 0 • • and a assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in section 19.32.300 (A) (1 -3). C. Order of Removal 1. The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way to violate the provisions of this chapter. D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly one year from the effective date of the ordinances Any public facility, which installs and operates a changing message sign must bontinue to comply with TMC 19.32.300 (A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subiect to the limitations in TMC 19.30. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed code language in a 5 -1 vote. Alternatives Any of the actions listed under the "Option" section of this Staff Report are available. Next Step Set a date for a public hearing. Panes 11 07/19/2006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1274, 2019 AND 2096, AS CODIFIED IN TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19, "SIGN CODE," TO EXPAND THE PURPOSES OF THE SIGN CODE, AND TO CREATE ADDITIONAL SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES; ESTABLISHIHNG A SUNSET PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide public agencies sign options to allow them to communicate with members of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to regulate certain types of signage located at public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Sign Code by addressing signage in certain zones where signs are typically not found; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase public safety and minimize driver distractions; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2006 and June 22, 2006 the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Sign Code; and on June 22, 2006 adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2006, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the • Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1274 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.04.020, "General Provisions: Purposes," is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.04.020 Purposes The purposes of this code are: 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly, and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. 2. To provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with Ai members of the public. C: Documents and Settings \All Users \Desktop \ Kelly \MSDATA \ Ordinances \Sign Code.doe DMia, 7/7/1006 Page 1 of 3 3. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. 4. To assure that 'the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulation. Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 1274, 2019 §1, and 2096 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.08.030, "'Definitions: Animated Sign," are hereby amended to read as follows: "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to g or flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or n fi r in nd or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions si dis la i 9 a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or g PYm temperature, or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300, shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered animated signs. Section 3. TMC Chapter 19.32, "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories," is hereby amended to indude additional sign regulations for public facilities, as follows: 19.32300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities that the criteria o g C19.3 3 0 y use is the sign as a changing message sign, provided The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not 2 The PP losions, fireworks, flashes of light, or appear to flash, unn dulate, pulse, or portray ex p , to blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move nto toward away from otherwise por expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, movement. L� &At 3. If he public facility is located within a residential zone, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7AM to 10PM. B. Notice of understanding. Any public facility that installs and operates a of changing message sign must submit a letter to the Director of the Department na which • '' Community Development, signed by the appropriate manager/ notes understanding of the above requirements and an assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in TMC 19.32300(A)( -3 ). of Community Development shall order the C. Order of Removal: The Director to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a removal of any sign constructed pursuant way that violates the Provisions of this chapter. from the D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly o n e � ty that effective date of the ordinance that adopted the code language. . e to comply with TMC installs and operates a changing message sign 19.32.300(A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign, and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subject to the limitations in TMC 1930. PakkAk - G \Documents end Settings \All Users \ Desktop \ Kelly \ MSDATMOrdinances \Sign Code.doc Page 2 of 3 �3 Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE QTY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF TUKWILA, WASHIN o at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of ATTEST/ AUTHENTICATED: 14 Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published Effective Date: Ordinance Number: C \Docrmenb and Settings\ All Users \ Desktop \Kelly\MSDATA \ Ordinances lSign Code.doc BM:kn 7/7/2006 Page 3 of 3 • CA-P lint [es L -aS -oC 4. Foster Hi gh School Sign P Scott Erdahl, Athletic Director for the Tukwila School District, presented the school district's e center sign that would board in front of Foster High School with an electronic message likely have display capabilities that exceed the allowances of the Tukwila sign code. A new electronic reader board would allow the District to display multiple messages about of school and community activities. The District is r and p limit rig animation a Lashing the LED board to certain hours of the day background displays. Mr. Lancaster confirmed that the TMC School 0 s0 wgnl code be prohibits "animated signs" and the propos ed considered an "animated sign'? if operated in a manner that causes the electronic message to flash, blink, scroll or otherwise portray movement, or if any message other than rime /date /temperature changes more than once District's request, staff recommends the committee is interested in considering the School be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The Committee members discussed various concerns about ttapsegn sign impacting would adjacent for residences, vehicle and pedestrian traffic, and what other schools and bu who may want to the allowed ittee have consider. lc One of the Lancaster — presented several alternatives for event announcements. This options could be to recommend an exemption for community exemption could be applied to all signs or could ther to specific land uses such as include modifying the public schools and public recreation facilities. O o p definition of an "animated sign" or exempting electronic message After e centers, considerable but wrens cont of prohibit flashing, streaming, video quality display g� the various options, the majority of the committee members recommended the issue be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their and and th eir recommendation mend tion. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing d the City Council. Jmh Committee Chair Approval 4111 Minutes Prepared by Joan Hernandez Present: Absent: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES ,, MAY 25, 2006 The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Ekberg at 7:00 PM Chair, Allan Ekberg, Vice Chair, George Malina, Commissioners, Bill Arthur, Lynn Peterson, Chuck Parrish. Commissioners Margaret Bratcher and Henry Marvin Representing City Staff: Steve Lancaster, Nora Cpierloff, Brandon Miles, and Wynetta Bivens BILL ARTHUR MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE WORKSESSION MINUTES AND THE PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES FROM MAY 25, 2006. GEORGE MALINA SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Chair Ekberg swore in those wishing to give public testimony. PLANNING COMMISSION CASE NUMBER L06-030 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Modification of chapter 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) regarding changing message signs at Public Facilities within the City. Aik LOCATION: Citywide Commissioner Arthur gave a public disclaimer that he received an e -mail from Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development. Commissioner Arthur stated that the appearance of the e-mail was different than what he would normally receive from Mr. Lancaster. Commissioner Arthur called Mr. Lancaster and inquired whether the e-mail was from a third party. After receiving confirmation that the e- mail was from a third party, he informed Mr. Lancaster that he was going to delete the e-mail. He said, for the record, that he does not open, receive, or read unsolicited e- mails. Commissioner Arthur also talked about the rules, procedures and policies that the Planning Commission practice. Mr. Lancaster responded to Commissioner Arthur's comments and gave clarification on what transpired. He stated that the e-mail he sent to Commissioner Arthur was also forwarded to all of the Planning Commission members for whom staff has an e -mail address. Mr. Lancaster forwarded the information to one Planning Commission member whom staff does not have an e -mail address for by mail. He explained that the matter was legislative and that he should have been clearer in communicating that to the Planning Commission members. Other Planning Commission members acknowledged that they too had received the e-mail, and that it addressed a legislative matter, concerning a case that was on the 5/25/06 agenda. CASE NUMBER L06-030 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Modification of Chapter 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) regarding • changing message signs at Public Facilities within the City. LOCATION: Citywide • Planning Commission Minutes May 25 2006 Page 2 of 4 Brandon Miles, Planner, Department pf Community Development, gave a presentation on the proposed project. Mr. Miles provided some background and answered numerous questions. Staff requests that the Planning Commission provide direction in regards to a possible Sign Code amendment, after conducting a public hearing. Staff has provided four options: 1. No Action. 2. Modify the defmition of "animated sign ". 3A, & 3B Exemption for community event announcements. 4. Eliminate prohibition of animated sign. The options were listed in detail in the 5/25/06 package. Mr. Lancaster provided some additional information on the last paragraph in option 3A and 3B, which reads `It should be noted that the courts have been increasingly critical of government sign regulations that base privileges or restrictions upon the content of the message.' Mr. Lancaster explained that the courts almost look at these kinds of cases as highly suspect and that they take a very careful and close look with almost a presumption that it could be a constitutional problem. Therefore, he urged the Planning Commission to be a little cautious, suggesting possibly limiting allowing signs that have public service kinds of announcements, to not be subjected to the same regulations as signs that provide a general message. Mr. Lancaster stated that option 2 would be on quite safe ground and staff could support that. He stated that option 4 is pretty radical from past practices, but staff could support it. Bill Van de Bogart, School District Business Manager, gave the presentation for the applicant. Mr. Van de Bogart addressed the matter concerning the e-mail that Mr. Lancaster forwarded to the Planning Commissioners. He stated that he wanted to get the information to the Commission in advance, to provide them time to read the school districts request. Mr. Van de Bogart said their mission iis how ear to work with the parents and teach the children the very best that they can. They struggle to communicate with the multi languages in the community. He gave a PowerPoint presentation, showing a picture of the existing sign and the new proposed sign, calling the old sign worthless because it is time consuming to change and unfeasible to change in several different languages. The proposed sign would change to several different languages to reach the children. Mr. Van de Bogart answered numerous questions. Kathy Znak, a citizen, expressed her concerns regarding the accident probability for non - english speaking people in the community trying to find something in their languages. She suggested that a traffic study is done. REBUTTAL: None. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Mr. Lancaster asked the Planning Commission, "If the applicant's request was accommodated how broadly do you want to accommodate it?" After extensive discussion, the Planning Commission determined they needed some additional information in order to make a decision. Staff needs to follow up on the following: 1. Check with the City Attorney to see if allowing what is otherwise a static sign to change to different languages permissible? 2. Provide additional information on brightness. 3. What are the variances of frequency for the changing message sign? 4. What would be a good timeframe for allowing animation? \ Planning Commission Minutes May 25 2006 Page 3 of 4 Mr. Lancaster suggested that the Commission take a look at what other Cities are allowing. Mr. Lancaster stated that his goal is to bring back to the next meeting, a proposed ordinance for the Planning Commission to look at. There was discussion on possible legal ramifications if a decision is challenged. The simplest thing would be to apply whatever decision the Planning Commission makes across the board to any legal sign in Tukwila. There were no further comments. Chair Ekberg continued the case to the June 22, 2006 Public Hearing. CASE NUMBER: L06 -023 11 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Creation of a "Wireless Telecommunications Chapter" within the City's Zoning Code. The chapter will regulate the placement and operation of wireless communication facilities. The chapter will provide guidance on where such facilities can locate in the City, development standards, approval process, and exception criteria. LOCATION: Citywide Brandon Miles, Planner, Department of Conununity Development, gave the presentation for staff. Mr. Miles facilitated discussion on the seven areas of the ordinance as listed in the May 10, 2006 Staff Report to provide the Planning Commission the opportunity to incorporate any revisions. The next step will be for the Planning Commission to forward a recommendation to the City Council for consideration. Commissioner Parrish raised the question whether staff had discussed the proposed purpose and intent with the IT Department and Council Member Haggerton. Staff stated there has been discussion with Councilmember Haggerton and that he has not provided them with any input at this time. There have also been informal conversations with other Cities and departments. Suggested Revisions: Item 1: Purpose and Intent: # 4 Remove the word `adequate' Item 2: Exemptions: # 2 Revise language Item 3: Definition # 9 - (this section already exist in the Zoning Code, however, it will be amended in order for Planning and PW to have the exact definition) - Take a look at Black's Law dictionary for the definition of Rights of Way #10 Correct misspelled word. Item 4: Permit Review Matrix • Staff was asked to return with a recommendation regarding the benefits, risk, and cost of changing Type 3 decisions to Type 2 decisions. • Staff will return with some good design standards for Utility Pole Co- Location — Possibly changing from a Type 2 decision. Mr. Lancaster made the request that very very clear design standards should be in place if it's a Type 2 decision. One possibility is that it has to be a metal pole with all of the • • Planning Commission Minutes May 25 2006 Page 4 of 4 cables concealed inside the Ipole to be a Type 2. If this guideline is not feasible, the decision type bumps up to a higher level ' • Staff shall provide a recommendation for the following option: If there are no design standards and the utility pole co- location is changed only in a residential area, should it be a Type 4 decision? Kathy Johnson, a Wireless Provider Consultant, provided some insight regarding utility poles because there has been a bit of contention. Wood poles are preferred by the utility providers because of the time involved in designing and engineering steel poles capable of holding the antennas. Most in the community find the wood pole less intrusive in the area and there are ways to mount the antennas around them. Ms. Johnson offered to bring in some pictures for th. Planning Commission to review. Ms. Johnson also offered to arrange to have a RF Engineer come witl$ her, to speak at the next Planning Commission meeting. Item 5: New Monopoles: • The following sentence should be incorporated in the draft policy — ' Any new monopole within the City will be required to allow co- location of other providers who wish to locate on the facility'. • Incorporate language for a certain amount of growth to support co- locations. Draft Ordinance Revisions: Page 3, letter b. - Sentence needs to be modified Page 3, Type (table) - Numbers need to be consistent in table in both the draft and the Staff Report Page 5, No. 4 - Parking - Modify language Page 5, No. 4 - Antenna Intensity — Modify language `Feed lines and coaxial cables shall be attached securely and appropriately to one of the transmission towers ' Page 6, No. 2 - Antennas Aesthetics - Modify language — `The screening must be made out of the same material and match the color scheme'. Mr. Miles recommended that the public hearing is continued and that staff return with additional information. There were no further comments. REBUTTAL: None. Chair Ekberg continued the case to the June 22, 2006 Public Hearing. Director's Report: • Update on mall construction • Sound Transit Light Rail project going on • Update on Tukwila Station project • Chair Ekberg asked for an update on the Klickitat project Meeting adjourned at 9:50 PM Submitted by: Wynetta Bivens Secretary Adopted 6/22/06 19 CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: The Public Hearing was called to order by Chair Ekberg at 7:00 PM Present: Absent: PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES JUNE 22, 2006 Chair, Allan Ekberg, Vice Chair, George Malina, Commissioners, Margaret Bratcher, Bill Arthur, Lynn Peterson, and Chuck Parrish. Commissioner, Henry Marvin DRAFT Representing ` City Staff: Steve Lancaster, Brandon Miles, Sandra Whiting, Cyndy Knighton, and Wynetta Bivens COMMISSIONER ARTHUR MADE A MOTION TO ADOPT THE PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AS MODIFIED, FROM JUNE 22, 2006. COMMISSIONER BRATCHER SECONDED THE MOTION; THE MOTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Steve Lancaster, Director, Departrnent of Community Development, introduced Cyndy Knighton. Cyndy Knighton, Senior Traffic Engineer, Public Works, gave a PowerPoint presentation on the Klickitat Project, which is a significant project for the City. Cyndy provided some background from the beginning of the project, listing the goals that the City identified and wanted to accomplish. A study was done to determine what could be done to the area, which resulted in the establishment of the alternative 3B concept. Due to concerns from some consultants that the design wasn't the most feasible to construct, the City came up with the idea of a design competition. HMTB Corporation was awarded the contract and came up with the current design. The City strongly believes the design has a lot of potential for an award winning design and construction. Ms. Knighton shared many details of the project, and then answered questions. Mr. Lancaster also introduced Sandra Whiting. Sandra Whiting, Urban Environmentalist, Department of Community Development, gave a PowerPoint presentation on the wetlands mitigation, which she has already presented to the City Council, whom the program was endorsed by. She provided some background on the program. It has been determined that on site mitigation is not always practical and that off site mitigation might be a better solution. Part of the project is to take a look at what areas could be used as mitigation sites. The objective of the program that was developed is to help facilitate development for smaller developers. It would offer alternatives to on site mitigation by providing some ideas where off site mitigation in Tukwila can occur. In addition, it would provide increased environmental projects and increased wetland functions. Chair Ekberg swore in those wishing to give public testimony. PLANNING COMMISSION L06 -034 Cingular Wireless The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to modify an existing wireless communication facility, which will be located on an existing City Light transmission tower. The antennas will be located on the top of the transmission tower. In order to meet minimum clearance from the high voltage electrical lines, the existing tower will be extended five feet in height. • • Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 2006 Page 2 of 6 The associated ground equipment will be located directly below the transmission tower in a 400 square foot enclosure. A chain -link fence with barbwire will enclose the. 400 square foot enclosure. The enclosure will include a 256 square foot concrete pad where the cabinet equipment will be located. LOCATION: City Light transmission tower, adjacent to the United 042304-9130. States Postal Facility and State Route 99. King County Parcel Commissioner Arthur made a declaration that his adult daughter that lives with him works for Cingular Wireless. He stated he did not believe the relationship would have any bearing on his objectivity. 1 There was no objection to Commissioner Arthur hearing the case. Brandon Miles, Planner, Department of Community Development, gave a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed project. As a result of the merger between AT &T and Cingular Wireless, a lot of the sites need to be upgraded to accommodate both networks. The maximum height in the MIC/H district is 125 feet. The applicant is proposing that the antennas have a height of approximately 153 feet. This type of application does not trigger compliance with the height requirements because it does not trigger a building permit, since it's on City Light's transmission tower. There is no impact to pedestrians. The need to move the antennas is a City Light safety requirement, to make it safer for their employees to service the line. There was a question raised regarding FAA lighting, which Mr. Miles deferred to the applicant. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit, as presented, with one condition: 1. All equipment attached to the City Light Transmission tower shall be painted to match the color of the tower. Sara Telschow, for the applicant, Realcom Associates, addressed the question raised regarding FAA lighting. There is no FAA lighting proposed for this project since it is only increasing by five feet in height. The applicant agrees with staff's condition; however, Ms. Telschow explained that it is very difficult to maintain paint on coaxial cables, therefore, requested that it not be a condition to paint them. REBUTTAL: Staff stated that if FAA lighting is necessary as a result of the proposed application, they will address it and determine if it needs to come back to the Planning Commission. There were no further comments. The Public Hearing was closed. The Planning Commission Deliberated. • CHAIR EKBERG MADE MOTION TO THE CONCLUSIONS, FOR CASE NUMBER RECOMMENDATIONS, AND THE ONE CONDITION TO READ: TRANSMISSION 1. ALL EQUIPMENT ALL BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE COLOR OF THE TOWER, WITH THE SHALL SHALL EXECPTION OF LES E ON THE SITE. �COSMMISSIONER ARTHUR SECONDED CA -AXIAL CABLES (V- Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 2006 Page 3 of 6 Chair Ekberg asked staff to come back to the Planning Commission some time in the future with some ideas on how the FAA is engaged in lighting situations and who may be responsible for such situations. Steve Lancaster provided some information on what the process is if the FAA needs to be, or is involved in, situations where lighting is necessary. Prior to opening the public hearing on case number L06 -030, Chair Ekberg called a recess. The Planning Commission and Staff gathered outside to look at the proposed electronic message board that the applicant had available for them to view. 5 -25 -06 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: L06 -030 City of Tukwila Modification of Chapter 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) regarding changing message signs at public facilities within the City. Citywide Brandon Miles, Planner, Department of Community Development, gave the presentation for staff. He provided background on the May 25 public hearing. At the May 25 public hearing, staff briefed the Planning Commission on a proposal from the Tukwila School District. The request was for modification of the Sign Code, to allow changing message signs at Foster High School. The school district's main reason for the sign is to display important messages to students and parents in multiple languages. Following the May meeting, the Planning Department spoke with the Parks Department concerning what needs they may have for this type of sign. The Parks Department indicated that such a sign could be used at the Tukwila Community Center to advertise events. Staff did some additional research onsafety s impacts for them these of signs. However, the Staff Report showed inconclusive either way regarding ty impacts signs. Information was mostly geared toward highways. Staff has provided a Draft Ordinance (Attachment A — 6/22/06 Planning Commission packet) with the following proposed changes: 1. Modify TMC 19.04.20 to add the following purpose clause: The City desires to provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. 2. Add language to the definition of animated signs (19.08.030) Animated Sign: Following temperature add - `or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300' Additional sign regulations for public facilities 19.32300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities, which meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.300, may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided the following: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, blinking or chasing lights, 411 • • Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 2006 Page 4 of 6 appear to move toward or away from the viewer, expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7 am to lOpm. B. Notice of understanding: 1. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Department of Community Development, signed by the appropriate manager /administrator that notes understanding of the above requirements and assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in section 19.32.300 (A)(1 -3). C. Order of Removal: 1. The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign erected pursuant to TMC 19.321 300 if the sign is used in such a way as to violate the provisions of this chapter. Staffs Recommedation: Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conclude the public hearing that started at the May meeting and that the proposed changes listed in the Draft Ordinance be forwarded with a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Alternatives: The following alternative actions are available to the Planning Commission: 1. Continue the public hearing at the July meeting and request additional information from the Planning Staff. 2. Any of the proposed alternatives which were listed in the May Staff Rep ort ( Attachment B). Steve Lancaster, Director, Department of Community Development, addressed the issue of proposed alternatives. He indicated that, based upon the testimony and discussion at the Planning Commission's May 25 meeting, staff believed it was the Commissions desire to pursue an alternative allowing electronic message boards to be displayed by public facilities. He indicated that the other options outlined in the staff reports are still in play, and that it is up to the Commission to decide what it wants to recommend to the City Council. There was additional discussion regarding the proposed ordinance language and its effect. Commissioner Peterson expressed concern about the perceived change in the color of the electronic message as one travels past the sign. He asked if that would violate the restriction against the image changing more frequently Mr. than in indicated he would not interpret the pr posed allowing guage to messages reate such a change more problem. frequently. Mr.I.an Bill Van De Bogart, with the Tukwila School hat al District, f the letters d essed change to amb g color and how the image on the sign would change, stated Mohammed Hassan, a citizen, was in favor of the message sign for communication, in multiple languages in the community. REBUTTAL: None. as Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 2006 Page 5 of 6 There were no further comments. The Public Hearing was closed. The Planning Commission Deliberated. Although they expressed some concerns, the majority of the Planning Commissioners stated their support for the project. Commissioner Arthur expressed concern over the proposed Code Amendments, indicating his opinion that the disadvantages of such changes d \itweigh the benefits. He indicated that throughout his tenure on the Planning Commission, the Planning Commission has attempted to minimize visual clutter and especially to limit such intrusions in neighborhoods. He believes this proposal would take the sign code in a different direction. He also expressed concern about treating public facilities differently from commercial uses. Chair Ekberg proposed looking at each item in the proposed ordinance individually to see if there were any changes. Several possible modifications were suggested. One suggestion was to specify that there could be "no perceived color change" on a message center. Chair Ekberg re- opened the public hearing at 9:33 pm in order to allow Commissioner Parrish to ask the applicant to address color and the language proposed by Chair Ekberg. Jacob Tilton, employed by a manufacturer electronic message center, stated that brightness or intensity would technically change the color of the text. He provided explanation of why the color appears to change even when the letters are all the same color. However, he has never had any experience with the color spectrum being an issue. Mr. Tilton recommended that the Planning Commission avoid anything that related to the actual message or the color of the text. He suggested focusing on the style or the timing issue, stating you should be able to read the full message in the time it takes to drive by once. The amount of time allowed for the image to change also dictates the size of the sign. If the sign is not large enough to include the entire message, then it's ineffective. Mr. Tilton usually recommends one second per line of text because that's how quickly we can read and process data. Mr. Lancaster asked the Commission for clarification of their concern regarding the change in color when walking back and forth, while' viewing the sign that was on display. He stated that he could not support a clause that reads the perception in color cannot change, due to the extreme difficulty of enforcing such a request. There were no further comments. The re- opened Public Hearing was closed. The Planning Commission deliberated. It was determined that the prohibition against "perceived color change" should not be part of the ordinance. Chair Ekberg suggested a `Sunset Clause' (Item D) to read - `This ordinance change would sunset one year from date of implementation'. • • • Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 2006 Page 6 of 6 As explained by Mr. Lancaster, tht proposed amendment would go away after one year if the City took no action and no new signs meeting these standards would be allowed. Existing signs that were lawfully erected under these provisions during that one year period would fall under section 19.300.30(a) and would be allowed to continue indefinitely, as long as it is not destroyed to more than 50% of it's value. If so, it would need to be removed: No changes could occur to the sign as technology changes. The proposed new regulation could be reviewed a year later in lieu of a Sunset Clause. CHAIR EKBERG MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED BY STAFF WITH THE 1 SECONDED T ORDINANCE SHALL SUNSET MOTION. FIVE VOTED IN IN YEAR. COMNIISS AND COMMISSIONER ARTHUR \OTED AGAINST. CHAIR U EKBERG IC I A COMMISSIONER MA C CONTINUE ►SECONDED THE MOTION. THE ALL 7/27/06 PUBLIC HE WERE IN FAVOR. Director's Report: • Update on Sound Transit 1. Looking at doing a study of running light rail from Burien to Renton and potentially further East. 2. Full funding for completion of the sounder station at Longacres. 3. A proposal to make street and traffic improvements for access from the Eastside. 4. Provide shadow service for the Sounder — bus services to connect the stations outside of the hours the trains are running. 5. Increase Sounder services up to 9 trips each direction. The City supports all of the proposed projects. • Mall project update Meeting adjourned at 10:10 PM Submitted by: Wynetta Bivens Secretary I, ue9ew E.)5,0c_k Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Short Subdivision Agenda Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Determination of. Non Miti ted Determination . of: Non- : S' nificance Determination of Significance Notice Scoping Notice of Action Official Notice Notice of Application Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this d a y o f l ikintin 'the year 20b1( P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: nIC Civ -C,t \ct j ' u? y, Project Number: E---D( --0( ( Mailer's Signature: SAAA,E,L.A. t e/Lock Person requesting mailing: ,, ; , /- Ar r -vi WAj --' I, ue9ew E.)5,0c_k Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Public Meeting Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Short Subdivision Agenda Shoreline Mgmt Permit FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Determination of. Non Miti ted Determination . of: Non- : S' nificance Determination of Significance Notice Scoping Notice of Action Official Notice Notice of Application Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this d a y o f l ikintin 'the year 20b1( P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM • () U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS () FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES ) OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC DEV. DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE KING COUNTY AGENCIES () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 () FIRE DISTRICT #2 ( ) K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DMSION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE ( ) TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) TUKWILA UBRARY () RENTON LIBRARY () KENT LIBRARY ( ) CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY ( ) OWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ( ) KENT PLANNING DEPT ( ) TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: () PUBLIC WORKS () POLICE () PLANNING () PARKS & REC. ( ) CITY CLERK () FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ()MAYOR ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM ( ) FISHERIES PROGRAM ( ) WILDLIFE PROGRAM ( ) SEATTLE TIMES () SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL • P:WDMTNISTRATIVE \FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC FEDERAL AGENCIES WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OTHER () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. () NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. fPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( jOFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES MEDIA ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE () KC. DEV & ENVIR SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR ( ) KC. TRANSIT DMSION - SEPA OFFICIAL () K.C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES () FOSTER LIBRARY () K C PUBLIC UBRARY ( ) HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT () RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) VAL -VUE SEWER DISTRICT ( ) WATER DISTRICT #20 () WATER DISTRICT #125 ( ) CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS () BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERIWATER DISTRICT () RENTON PLANNING DEPT () CITY OF SEA -TAC () CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. LOCAL AGENCIES () DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () P.S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY () SOUND TRANSIT () DUWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION 'SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW P: ADMINISTRATIVEIFORMS \CHKLIST.DOC PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section *Applicant *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) *Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division — SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan,. elevations, etc. from PMT's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application.' If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that written comments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attorney General *Applicant *Indian Tribes *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT"s) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline — Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) 01 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -367( File Number: E06 -011 Appl ied: 06/09/2006 Issue Date: 06/28/2006 Status: APPROVED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Applicant: BRANDON MILES Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development is proposing to modify TMC Chapter 19 "Signs ". The modifications would permit public facilities to install electronic changing message displays. The proposed code amendments apply citywide. Location of Proposal: Address: 6300 SOUTHCENTER BL TUKW Parcel Number: 0003200005 • Section/Township /Range: CITYWIDE The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. L .J• . 2 ? 1 ?-o(,, Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official Date City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) • doc: DNS E06 -011 Printed: 06-26 -2006 • • To: Steve Lancaster From: Brandon Miles Date: June 26, 2006 Re: E06 -011 (SEPA Determination) Modifications to Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Project Description: MEMORANDUM • The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development is proposing to modify TMC Chapter 19 "Signs ". The modifications would permit public facilities to install electronic changing message displays. The proposed code amendments apply citywide. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None, this is a non - project action. Other Required Permits: None, this is a non - project action. Summary of Primary Impacts: Earth No impacts are anticipated, as this is a non - project action. •Air Electronic changing displays do not have any impacts on air quality. Water • • Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner E06 -011, Sign Code Amendments SEPA Staff Report • Plants • Animals • Any application to install a sign within in the City would have to comply with all development requirements, including compliance with the City's shoreline regulations and wetland regulations. Some ornamental vegetation may be removed during installation of these signs. However, it is doubtful that any significant trees would be removed as a result of sign installation. The City of Tukwila has animals that are typical for those found in urban settings, such as birds and rodents. The entire Puget Sound region is part of the Pacific Flyway for migrating birds. The Duwamish River is home to threatened salmon. It is highly unlikely that these signs will have an impact on any animals within the City. Energy/Natural Resources The signs will operate using electrical power. The amount of power consumed during operation of the signs is minimal. Environmental Health The proposed code amendments will allow electronic changing message signs citywide, including in residential zones. The proposed amendment will limit the operations of such signs within residential zones to the hours of lam to 10pm. Additionally, all electronic changing signs will have to comply with the City's restrictions on illumination and brightness. The signs will also be required to install ambient light monitors. Land /Shoreline Use The zoning on properties that contain public facilities varies. Most all located within residential zones. There are some public facilities located within the shoreline zone; however it is unlikely that electronic changing message signs will locate at these facilities. Housing Non - project action. No houses will be demolished or constructed. Aesthetics The City's basic development standards will not be impacted by these changes. The City currently allows all public facilities to have either freestanding or wall signs. This code amendment would permit those permitted signs to have an electronic changing message display. Q: \SEPA \Sign Code \sepa - staffrpt.doc 2 • Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner E06 -011, Sign Code Amendments SEPA Staff Report • Light and Glare The proposed code amendments will allow electronic changing message signs citywide, including in residential zones. The proposed amendment will limit the operations of such signs within residential zones to the hours of lam to 10pm. Additionally, all electronic changing signs will have to comply with the City's restrictions on illumination and brightness. The signs will also be required to install ambient light monitors. • Recreation The code amendment will have no impact on recreation sites. The proposed changes may in fact increase the number of individuals participating in City, County, and School District events by increasing knowledge of such events. • Historic and Cultural Preservation The only site within the City that is eligible for an electronic changing message display is Tukwila Library (The old School House). There are no plans to install such a sign at this location. • Transportation Non - project action. No impacts anticipated. • Public Services N/A • Utilities Non - project action. Recommendation: Determination of Non - Significance No public comments were received during the Notice of Application period regarding this SEPA application. Q: \SEPA \Sign Code \sepa- staffrpt.doc 3 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1. g coc.K. HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance y(4,to' f" Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Mailer's Signature: j!,a Notice of Action f Planning Commission Agenda Pkt t,( ,0'71 Al ( e Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda - V Aotice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other • Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 day of ( -Lktkin the year 20 O tit P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: ` 4 C y(4,to' f" Project Number: ROCQ-01 Mailer's Signature: j!,a £. i;(l'i)Ci■ f Person requesting mailing: t,( ,0'71 Al ( e • Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 1 day of ( -Lktkin the year 20 O tit P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM • P:WDM ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( )'EPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ),OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ,TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ( ) DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES () OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR ( ) DEPT OF COMM. TRADE & ECONOMIC () DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE () BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD () FIRE DISTRICT #11 ( ) FIRE DISTRICT #2 () K.C. WASTEWATER TREATMENT DIVISION () KC. DEPT OF PARKS & REC () KC. ASSESSORS OFFICE IUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA UBRARY () RENTON UBRARY () KENT LIBRARY () CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY () OWEST ( ) SEATTLE CITY LIGHT () PUGET SOUND ENERGY () HIGHUNE WATER DISTRICT () SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT ( ) AT &T CABLE SERVICES ENT PLANNING DEPT KWILA CITY DEPARTME UBLIC WORKS POUCE P LANNING P ARKS & REC. () ITY CLERK VEATTLE TIMES ( ) SOUTH COUNTY JOURNAL ISTRATIV E\FORMS \CHKLIST.DOC WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES FIRE ( ) FINANCE ( ) BUILDING ()MAYOR DEV. ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( ) S SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE CULTURAL RESOURCES PROGRAM F SHERIES PROGRAM WILDLIFE PROGRAM FEDERAL AGENCIES () DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. 4 )DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELAND DIV DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION' ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL ` SEND CHKLIST W/ DETERMINATIONS • SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION KING COUNTY AGENCIES SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES UTILITIES CITY AGENCIES () U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. ( ) NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE C. DEV & ENV!R SERVICES-SEPA INFO CNTR C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL () C. LAND & WATER RESOURCES FOSTER LIBRARY C PUBUC UBRARY IGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ( ) OLYMPIC PIPELINE AL -WE SEWER DISTRICT ( )WATER DISTRICT #20 'WATER DISTRICT #125 () CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS ( ) BRYN MAWR- LAKERIDGE SEWERNVATER DISTRICT ) () RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC 'CITY OF BURIEN ( ) TUKW ILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS ( ) TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS () CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER - DCLU () STRATEGIC PLANNING OFFICE' • NOTICE OF ALL SEATTLE RELATED PLNG PROJ. OTHER LOCAL AGENCIES bOUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE () S. AIR POLLUTION CLEAN AGENCY SOUND TRANSIT ( ) UWAMISH RIVER CLEAN -UP COALITION •SEND NOTICE OF ALL APPUCATIONS ON DUWAMISH RIVER MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES ( ) CI.TUKWILA.WA.US.WWW SEPA MAILINGS Mail to: (comment period starts on date of mailing) Dept. of Ecology Environmental Review Section •Applicant "Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list) Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination KC Transit Division —•SEPA Official would like to receive information about all projects that might affect transit demand Send These Documents to DOE: SEPA Determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report, usu. with MDNS) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plari, etc. from PMI's) Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed or sent to newspaper) SHORELINE MAILINGS: Notice of Application for a Substantial Development Permit must be mailed to owners and to property owners within 500 feet of subject property, comments are due 30 days after the notice of application is mailed/posted. The notice of Application for Shoreline Substantial Development Permit must include a statement that any person desiring to submit written comments on the application or desiring to receive notification of the final decision on the application may do so within 30 days of the notice of application. If a hearing will be held on the application, the hearing notice must include the information that writtencomments may be submitted, or oral presentation made at the hearing. Shoreline Permit Notice of Decision: Mail to: (within 8 days of decision; 21-day appeal period begins date received by DOE) Department of Ecology Shorelands Section State Attomey General *Applicant 'Indian Tribes • *Other agencies as necessary (checked off on attached list). •Any parties of record • send only the staff report, site plan and the SEPA Determination Send These Documents to DOE and Attorney General: Permit Data Sheet Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) Shoreline Permit Application Form (filled out by applicant) Drawings/Plans of project (site plan, elevations, etc. from PMT's) - Site plan, with mean high water mark & improvements - Cross- sections of site with structures & shoreline Grading Plan — Vicinity map SEPA determination (3 -part from Sierra) Findings (staff report or memo) SEPA Checklist (filled out by applicant) Any background studies related to impacts on shoreline Notice of Application Affidavit of Distribution (notice was mailed) P: 1ADM[MSTRATIVEIFORMSICWCLIST.DOC PUBLIC NOTICE MAILINGS FOR PERMITS City of Tukwila NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED June 14, 2006 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director The following applications have been submitted to the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development for review and decision. APPLICANT: City of Tukwila, Department of Community Development AGENT: Brandon. J. Miles, Assistant Planner LOCATION: Citywide OWNER OF THE PROPERTY: Citywide FILE NUMBER: E06 =011 PROPOSAL: The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development is proposing modifications to the City's sign code with regards to change message signs. The proposed changes would permit changing message signs at public facilities within the City of Tukwila. These types of signs would be limited to the number of times the image can change, have to meet all applicable City development standards, and in some cases the hours of operations will be limited. These files can be reviewed at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431 -3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 -431 =3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 • You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments regarding the environmental impacts of the proposed code changes by 5:00 p.m. on June 28, 2006. If you have questions about this proposal contact Brandon J. Miles, Planner -in- charge of this project at (206) 431 -3684 or by email at bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS 1111 This is a legislative matter and there are no appeals of legislative decisions. • Please send comments to: City of Tukwila Planning Attn: Brandon J. Miles 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT DATE OF APPLICATION: June 9, 2006 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 9, 2006 NOTICE OF APPLICATION POSTED: June 13, 2006 • A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Modification of TMC Title 19 regarding certain types of signage within the City of Tukwila. 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila DCD 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila DCD 6300 Southcenter Bl. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 • 4. Date checklist prepared: June 9, 2006 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Anticipation of adoption of the proposed amendment August 2006. Epic File No. E06 -011 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. Brandon Miles Page 1 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Last printed 06/09/2006 1:51 PM Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT • 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. • No applications are pending, however applications for new signs within the City of Tukwila are expected. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Sign permits would be required for any new signs or modifications to existing signs. Electrical permits may also be required through Washington Labor and Industries. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The City is amending Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Title 19 regarding signage in the City. The proposed changes will allow for electronic changing message signs at public facilities within the City of Tukwila. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The proposed modifications impacts current and future public facilities within the City of Tukwila. TMC 19.08.175 provides the following definition of public facility, "Any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school, public library, community center, public park, government facility or similar uses. Example of public facilities in the City include all schools operated by the Tukwila School District, City Hall, the Community Center, Foster Library, Tukwila Library, and all Fire Stations. A map of all public facilities is attached to this checklist. The number of public facilities could change in the future due to government projects. One example of a future public facility is the Light Rail Station at Southcenter Blvd. and Tukwila International Blvd. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use 0 Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page2 06/09/2006 Page 2 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT These changes would affect the entire City, including those properties that might contain sensitive areas (slopes, streams, and wetlands). Any future development within sensitive areas would have to comply with the City's regulations on slopes, wetlands, and streams. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: These changes would affect the entire City. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? These changes would affect the entire City. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. These changes would affect the entire City. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Non - project action. These changes would affect the entire City. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of filL Non - project action. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Non - project action. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non - project action. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non - project action. These changes would not affect Tukwila's existing erosion control regulations. Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 3 06/ 09/ 2006 Page 3 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Non - project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: These changes would affect the entire City. 3. Water Non - project action. a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. These changes would affect the entire City. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Non - project action. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Non - project action. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. Non - project action. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. These changes would affect the entire City. Non - project action. Telecommunications Chapter Page 4 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 4 X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Non - project action. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. 4. Plants Non - project action. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Non - project action. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Non - project action. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Non - project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Non - project action. a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: 10 Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 5 Page 5 06/09/2006 X pasture X crop or grain X wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other X water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other X other types of vegetation Birds:. Variety of species Mammals. Rodents, domestic animals, deer, and coyotes Fish: Variety of fish species in the Duwamish /Green Rivers Other: • • t ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non - project action. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non - project action. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Non - project action. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non - project action. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Non - project action. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Non - project action. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Non - project action. Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 6 06/09/2006 Page 6 • 4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. Non - project action. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Non - project action. These changes would not affect Tukwila's existing energy efficiency regulations. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Non - project action. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None needed. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Non - project action. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Non - project action. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Non - project action. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Non - project action. Telecommunications Chapter Page 7 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 7 • Non - project action. o ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. Non - project action. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Non - project action. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Non - project action. f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? These changes would affect the entire City. g. 1• If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Non - project action. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. These changes would affect the entire City, some areas of the City are considered "environmentally sensitive ". Any development would have to comply with the City's existing regulations regarding environmentally sensitive areas. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Non - project action. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Non - project action. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None required. L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Any proposed signs would have to comply with TMC Title 19 with regards to the placement and size of such devices. • Telecommunications Chapter Page 8 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 8 • • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? Non - project action, no units would be built. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Non - project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Non - project action. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Signs within the City generally can be no taller than the building they are used to advertise. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non - project action. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Changing message signs at public facilities will not be permitted to change more frequently than once every 24- hours. The hours of operations for such signs will be limited if the sign is located within a residential zone. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Non - project action. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Non - project action. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Non - project action. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 9 06/09/2006 Page 9 • 4, ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT Any proposed changing message sign will have to comply with the following requirements. 1. The changing message portion of the sign may not occupy an area greater than 50 percent of the allowable sign area. 2. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every 15 seconds. 3. The image must appear and disappear as one contiguous image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement. 4. If the public facility is located within a residential zone as defined by @, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of lam to 10pm. 5. All signs shall meet the illumination and brightness level noted in TMC 19.16.035. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Non - project action. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None required. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. These changes would affect the entire City. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. These changes would affect the entire City. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: These changes would affect the entire City. The Tukwila library would be permitted to have a changing message sign, however, the Tukwila Parks • Telecommunications Chapter Page 10 06/09/2006 Q: \ Sign\ SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 10 • 14. Transportation • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT Department and King County library have not expressed interest in installing such a sign. a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. These changes would affect the entire City. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? These changes would affect the entire City. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Non - project action. No changes are proposed to parking standards. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Non - project e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. These changes would affect the entire City. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Signs do not generate additional traffic trips. g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Limited the number of times a changing message sign can change images to once every 20 seconds. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No, existing uses and development patterns would not change. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Telecommunications Chapter Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 11 06/09/2006 Page 11 • 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. These changes would affect the entire City. • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT None expected. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Non - project action. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: ill Telecommunications Chapter Page 12 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 12 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (Do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result form the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than in the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? The proposal would allow public facilities to have a specific type of signage that is not currently allowed. The proposed changes would have not impact on water, the air, and no toxic or hazardous substances would be released. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: No measures proposed. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish or marine life? No substantive changes to Tukwila's environmental regulations are proposed. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish or marine life are: None proposed 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The changes would be unlikely to affect the consumption of natural resources. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for government protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? No impact anticipated. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: None needed. Telecommunications Chapter Page 13 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 13 • • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST DRAFT 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The proposed changes would not affect the City current regulations regarding signage or developments within shoreline areas. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: All proposed signs will have to comply with the City's sign code regulations. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? No impacts foreseen. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: None 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. No such conflicts are anticipated. Telecommunications Chapter Page 14 06/09/2006 Q: \Sign \SEPA Checklist.DOC Page 14 • Public Facilities Eligible for a Changing Message Sign ifir,1: : 2 •-= re. .. -= -I II == = 1 El•-, \ 1 • in -- . a 1 1111 Nan= _-�Iltr i L IC lull rl�p lf�,�( �j ii om Iu 1 g II ■ 1� ■jairr �I 1..1••• un p m ��_.c _ _ i r ; •I .1111-., =. I� .1= r a w "1� 11 11 •.. ■1 .r r. r -- i .. rGi iri 6F ern_ /I 1 e i X11 -1- .111:11 ■11111111i�:1�t � 7– :` ! 1r!!k 'l11 5'P 1 ■�� Nom 1 \i =.11'11 ii � � r� ®© lii % ud 1e 1_11 1� MAIM ' II AIBEIPM ran III, In nisi c% Z IP i. id 11 111 : ■ cc� � _ = � 1011 1011 �IIIli1 • �I�AI�11:1'i1G1�� ,IFI 1 �Itlil�glOienloel�i �■ i.:��..ae— =��.....t_ . � 5111il11'% 1 Volum mt. nM.r, WWI raialall: 000 111 11 THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE FILE TYPE OPTION 002 MEMORY TX ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL 2) BUSY Department of Community Devetoorrent 6300 Southcerter E1vd, Suite 100 Yucwila,WA 96188 Phone: (2C6) 431 -3670 Fax: (206) 431 -3665 Pax: Phone: Lck (Jeivc' TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT (JUL 06 '06 O9 :54AM) TUKWILA DCD /PW (AUTO) TEL NO. PAGE RESULT 9 *- 4253883670 02/02 OK 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION ❑ Urgent El For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, Wn 4 ,,,L ())/1,46 ^ / HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Project Number: . 2 Mailer's Signature: 1) 61/t CJ Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda otice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3O day of Uin the year 200(.e XJ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL ' 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: �) S (Jo A A f Project Number: . 2 Mailer's Signature: 1) 61/t CJ Person requesting mailing: ( V f A (\.. S Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 3O day of Uin the year 200(.e XJ P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL ' 08/29/003:31 PM Parcel Map and Data 1523049114 1523049054 1523049168 Cr 1523 til + 9122 ' . 1523049171 ` 1523049041 D 1 623D$924 0 12Y .. 1523049031 'r 15230490/0 2' 9212" -. l •52304911Y~"" " .ri . 762 3049197 1 S 144T es t10fl054 ttl V I I I " ; t 14516 t g .06400015i7 004 0000521 00400 44522, f}DSIiOJOr336 . • rq tki 01330A00a30 , 440000514 Parcel Number 1523049037 Address 14261 MACADAM RD S Zipcode 98168 Taxpayer GEEHAN RICHARD A The information included on this map has been compiled by King County staff from a variety of sources and is subject to change without notice. King County makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or rights to the use of such information. King County shall not be liable for any general, special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages including, but not limited to, lost revenues or lost profits resulting from the use or misuse of the information contained on this map. Any sale of this map or information on this map is prohibited except by written permission of King County." Print Map Page King County x� ; �li t �m � ews .3 1i., Services By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. • • Comments: King County 1 GIS Center1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Sea rch Page 1 of 1 http://www5.metrokc.gov/parcelviewer/Print_Process.asp 07/05/2006 � *` "A'w' ,,, Tukwila City Council Agenda o ►% _ z' • COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE ❖ - , �' 9 i `E Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Councilmembers: • Joe Duffie • Joan Hernandez i kW ` Rhonda Berry, City Administrator • Pam Carter • Jim Haggerton ` ~ i9o8 Dennis Robertson, Council President • Pamela Linder • Verna Griffin Monday, July 10, 2006; 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall; Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER/ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS > Vision 2020 Update: Ben Bakkenta, Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) (15 minutes) > Special Announcements: a. Police Department Promotion: Mark Howie, Sergeant b. Parks and Recreation transferred employees: Tracy Gallaway, Volunteer Coordinator (Volunteer & Events Superintendent); and Shannon Fisher, Recreation Coordinator (Special Events) 3. CITIZEN � COMMENT At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda. To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue is p esented for discussion. 4. SPECIAL ISSUES a. evisi . ` 1t� � Pg.5 Co � 44 b. Ratification of 2006 Countywide Pluming Policy Amendments. Pg.19 c. 2006 Small Drainage Program Construction Management Pg.43 Services Supplement No. 2 with DMJM Harris. d. City communication to citizens. Pg.53 a. Mayor c. Staff e. Intergovernmental b. City Council d. City Attorney 5. REPOR TS 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING •v SPECIAL MEETING • 0 • Ord #2126 • Res #1609 1....)• X • \I ....� -J 1. CALL TO ORDER/ ROLL CALL (Continued) 2. CONSENT AGENDA Special Meeting (Continued) m ktly 10, 2006 Wage 2 a. Approval of minutes: 6/5/06 Regular; 6/19/06 Regular b. Approval of vouchers. c. Accept as complete the Card Access Control System Project Pg.57 with ecurity Systems of Lacey, Washington; authorize re of retainage, subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures (final cost of project: $83,883.11). d. Accept as complete the City Shops Re -roof Project with Pg.63 Western Roofing Service of Redmond, Washington; authorize release of retainage subject to the standard claim and lien release procedures (final cost of project $219,776.00). e. Accept turnover of street improvements and storm detention facility as part of the Cascade Glen (a/lq/a Hillside Homes) development (value of transferred assets from the developer to the City is $351,752.55). Pg.69 3. ADJOURNMENT • Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office 206 - 433 1800/rDD 206 -248 -2933. This notice is available at www.ci.tukwila.wa.us and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio taped. HOW TO TESTIFY If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business. COUNCIL MEETINGS No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given. Reg ular- Meetings - The Mayor, elected py the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of o a • . • s ces can only be taken at Regular Council meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings - Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m. Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action. GENERAL ` -O ORMATION At each Council meeting citizens are given the opp • as "ty to address the Council on items that are not included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to five minutes. Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as those used in Regular Council meetings. Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel matters. • PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as 'land-use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the! Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings: 1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a presentation. 2. The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes each. No one may speak a second time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken. 5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker. Each speaker can respond to thel question, but may not engage in further debate at this time. • 6. After the Public Hearing is closed, the Council may discuss the issue among themselves without further public testimony. Council action may be taken at this time or postponed to another date. Meeting Date Prepared by Mayor's review Ouneil 'ew 07/10/06 BM for ' _/ 4—''` CAS NUMBER: D — 0 — 1 7 AGENDA ITEM TITLE Sign Code Revisions CATEGORY ® Discussion ❑ Motion ❑ ?esolution Mtg Date 7/10 Mtg Date Mtg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ Adm Svcs ® DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ Legal ❑ Pe'R ❑ Police ❑ PW/ The Tukwila School District has requested that the City's sign code be modified to permit changing message displays. The City's sign code currently bans any sign that changes content more than once every 24- hours. The proposed draft ordinance would permit public facilities to have changing message displays that change content no more than once every 10 seconds. SPONSOR'S SUMMARY 110EWED BY Fund Source: N/A Comments: N/A 7/10 7/10 ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ Utilities Cmte DATE: 4/25/06 Go UNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS CA &P Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. Lutialt ITEM INFORMATION ORIGINAL AGENDA DATE: 7/10/06 Ordinance ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date 8/7/0€ Mtg Date ❑ F &S Cmte ❑ Parks Comm. ® Public Hearing Mtg Date 8/7/06 RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Forward to the 8/7 meeting for a Public Hearing and adoption. COMMITTEE CAP referred the matter to the Planning Commission. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED $N /A Staff Report 0;AtT /- FUNQ:SOURCE AMOUNT BUDGETED $N /A : RECORIY., CILAC TION = ATTACHMENTS 7/10 Draft Ordinance 7/10 Community Affairs and Parks Minutes from the April 25, 2006 Meeting ITEM No. ❑ Other Mtg Date ❑ Transportation Cmte ® Planning Comm. APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $N /A 7/10 Map of properties eligible for changing message signs. MIS: Planning Commission minutes not attached due to short turnaround tom. • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Committee of the Whole Staff Report FROM: Steve Lancaster, Director Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner RE: Changing Mess Signs DATE: June 23, 2006 Issue The City has been approached by the Tukwila School District to amend Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) to permit signs which change more frequently than once every 24- hours. The School District proposes to install an electronic message center at Foster High School. Planning Staff briefed Community Affairs and Parks (CAP) on April 25, 2006. CAP referred the matter to the Planning Commission and on May 25, 2006 the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing. On June 22, 2006, the Planning Commission closed the Public Hearing and made a recommendation to the Council. Analysis of Existing Code Title 19 of the TMC regulates all types of signage in the City. Unless specifically listed as exempted, a sign permit is required for all types of signs that are discemable from adjacent properties and the City's rights of way (TMC 19.12.010). Any permanent signs, either freestanding or wall sign are required to have a sign permit. In all commercial and industrial zones most businesses, if they qualify, can have two signs. The business can choose from two wall signs or a freestanding and wall sign. The City applies different development standards for signs located in residential zones. Under TMC 19.32.080 churches, schools, public facilities, and conditional uses may have one sign for every street they front. No sign may be greater than 50 square feet in size. The sign may either be a wall or freestanding sign. Any use in the City may have an electronic message center as part of the sign. However, under TMC 19.08.030, if the sign changes more frequently than once Dori= 1 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 07/03/2006 every 24- hours, the sign would be considered an animated sign. Animated signs •+ are strictly prohibited in the City (TMC 19.28.010). Tukwila School District has proposed an electronic message sign that would change copy more than once every 24 -hours and thus would not be permitted in the City. Discussion Tukwila's land use regulations attempt to minimize impacts within residential zones by restricting certain activities. 1 \' All schools in the City are located in and are adjacent to Low Density Residential zoned land. Schools provide a sense of community and a gathering place for City residents. Events that occur at schools provide opportunities for Tukwila residents to interact. Placing a changing message sign, such as what the School District is proposing would allow the District to advertise many events that benefit the community. The City limits many activities that occur within residential zones. Most commercial operations are excluded, home occupations are permitted but under very specific conditions, and almost all non - residential; uses that may locate in residential zones require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Options Planning Staff presented these options regarding this issue to the Planning Commission at the May 25, 2006 meeting. These options are similar to the ones that were presented to CAP at the meeting on April 25, 2006. 1. No Action. The Planning Commission could choose to take no action, in which case the proposed sign, if erected, would be limited to no more than one message change per day. No flashing, blinking, scrolling or other message movement would be allowed. The School District has indicated that they would not construct the sign under these circumstances. 2. Modify the definition of "animated sign ". The definition could be modified to allow changing messages more frequently than once every 24- hours. The Planning Commission could also consider relaxing restrictions on flashing, scrolling or other effects. Any modification to the definition would apply citywide. 3. Exemption for community event announcements. Brandon -M Page 2 not n1"1tA/ QTA CC DCD(lDT Ann 07/03/2006 IP • • • • 3A. Allow any otherwise permitted sign within the City to display changing messages but limit the message to public service announcements. For example, the City of Lacey allows public service signs to have changing message signs. "Public service signs in the form of changing message center signs may be permitted. However, the changing message center signs shall not be used for commercial purposes, such as to advertise a product, service, or use. Messages will be strictly limited to public information regarding activities, events, time, date, tem /,erature, atmospheric condition and news of interest to the general public. Said signs shall be limited to the type, size, shape, and location specified for the zoning district in which said signs are located". 3B. Allow only public facilities to have changing message signs. This would allow the school district to construct a changing message sign. It would also allow for all schools, libraries, and City buildings such as City Hall and the Community Center to have a changing message sign. The term "public facility" is defined in TMC 19.08.175 to mean any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school, public library, community center, public park, govemment facility or similar use. Most of public facilities are located within residential zones. Staff has provided an attached map which shows all schools, City facilities, libraries, and utility district offices within the City. The City currently exempts changing message signs limited to "time, date and temperature" from the City's animated sign prohibition. The City could extend this exemption to also allow changing messages relating to "community events or announcements ". It should be noted that the courts have been increasingly critical of government sign regulations that base privileges or restrictions upon the content of the message. 4. Eliminate prohibition of animated signs. The Planning Commission could recommend the prohibition against animated signs for the entire City being removed. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission chose to pursue option 3B and allow public facilities to be permitted to have changing message signs. mmlonns Attachment "A" is the proposed ordinance and is in legislative format. New language that will be added is shown underline and deleted language is shown as Modify TMC 19.04.020 to add the following purpose clause: 2. The City desires to provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. Add language to the definition of animated signs (19.08.030): "Animated sign" means any sign or portion or which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animated at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date, or temperature or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300 shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered to animated signs. Add the following section to 19.32 "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories ". TMC.19.32.300 "Additional Sian Regulations for Public Facilities" A. Signs located at public facilities which meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.080 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided the following: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks. flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of lam to 1 Opm. (Note: Any electronic sign in the City must meet the illumination and brightness levels set in TMC 19.16.035). B. Notice of Understanding 1. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Department signed by the appropriate manager /administrator that notes understanding of the above requirements Brandon -M Page 4 07/03/2006 _ —_ .. �.. .�... ., r. •r n•nno7 0 • • • and a assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in section 19.32.300 (A) (1 -3). C. Order of Removal 1. The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way to violate the provisions of this chapter. D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly one year from the effective date of the ordinance,! Any public facility, which installs and operates a changing message sign must continue to comply with TMC 19.32.300 (A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subject to the limitations in TMC 19.30. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed code language in a 5 -1 vote. Alternatives Any of the actions listed under the "Option" section of this Staff Report are available. Next Step Forward the proposed ordinance to the July 17, 2006 regular meeting for a public hearing and possible adoption. ‘bia n7inzrJnnR AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NOS. 1274, 2019 AND 2096, AS CODIhlEI) IN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 19, "SIGN CODE," TO EXPAND THE PURP SES OF THE SIGN CODE, AND TO CREATE ADDITIONAL SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES; ESTABLISHIHNG A SUNSET PROVISION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide public agencies sign options to allow them to communicate with members of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to regulate certain types of signage located at public facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the Sign Code by addressing signage in certain zones where signs are typically not found; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to increase public safety and minimize driver distractions; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2006 and June 22, 2006 the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the Sign Code; and on June 22, 2006 adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; and WHEREAS, on August 7, 2006, the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY( ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1274 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.04.020, "General Provisions: Purposes," is hereby amended to read as follows: 19.04.020 Purposes The purposes of this code are: 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly, and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. 2. To provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. CADocumenta and Settings All Users \DesktOP \Kelly \MSDATA \Ordinances \ Sign Code.doc Page 1 of 3 • i • • • 3. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. 4. To assure that the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulation. Section 2. Ordinance Nos. 1274, 2019 §1, and 2096 §1 (part), as codified at TMC 19.08.030, "Definitions: Animated Sign," are hereby amended to read as follows: "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or temperature, or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300, shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered animated signs. Section 3. TMC Chapter 19.32, "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories,' is hereby amended to include additional sign regulations for public facilities, as follows: 19.32.300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities that meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.300 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided that the following criteria is also met: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone, the use of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of 7AM to 10PM. B. Notice of understanding. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Director of the Department of Community Development, signed by the appropriate manager /administrator, which notes understanding of the above requirements and an assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in TMC 19.32.300(A)(1 -3). C. Order of Removal: The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way that violates the provisions of this chapter. D. The language codified in TMC 19.32.300 shall sunset exactly one year from the effective date of the ordinance that adopted the code language. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must continue to comply with TMC 19.32.300(A)(1 -3) for the life of the sign, and will be considered a non - conforming sign and subject to the limitations in TMC 19.30. . VMcnsre n.ainann.'Sian Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE QTY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2006. ATTEST'/ AUTHENTICATED: t' Jane E. Cantu, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Office of the City Attorney Attachments: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor C: \Documents and Settings\ All Users \ Desktop \ Kelly \MSDATA\Ordinances \Sign Code.doc BM:kn 71112006 Filed with the City Clerk: Passed by the City Council: Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Page 3 of 3 IPP • • • 1 . 7 Community Affairs and Parks Committee - Page 2. April 25, 2006 4. Foster High School Sign Proposal. Scott Erdahl, Athletic Director for the Tukwila School District, presented the school district's proposal to replace the existing reader board in front of Foster High School with an electronic message center sign that would likely have display capabilities that exceed the allowances of the Tukwila sign code. A new electronic reader board would allow the District to display multiple messages about school and community activities. The District is receptive to limiting operating times of the LED board to certain hours of the day and limiting animation and flashing background displays. Mr. Lancaster confirmed that the TMC 19.28.010(3) sign code prohibits "animated signs" and the proposed Foster High School sign would be considered an "animated sign'' if operated in a manner that causes the electronic message to flash, blink, scroll or otl}erwise portray movement, or if any message other than time /date/temperature changes more than once every 24 hours. However, if the committee is interested in coisidering the School District's request, staff recommends the issue be referred to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation. The Committee members discussed various concems about the sign impacting adjacent residences, vehicle and pedestrian traffic, and what kind of a precedent it would set for other schools and businesses who may want to be allowed to have electronic signs. Mr. Lancaster presented several alternatives for the committee to consider. One of the options could be to recommend an exemption for community event announcements. This exemption could be applied to all signs or could be limited to specific land uses such as public schools and public recreation facilities. Other options could include modifying the definition of an "animated sign" or exempting electronic message centers, but continue to prohibit flashing, streaming, video quality display signs. After considerable discussion of the various options, the majority of the committee members recommended the issue be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing and forward their recommendation to the City Council. Jmh Committee Chair Approval Minutes Prepared by: Joan Hernandez 1� Public Facilities Eligible for a Changing Message Sign • • :111f.: IIIIAI \`1 °ICI #'1 •. ■aih1�111�■ rt.w.64*. .. _ R, IIII il��i ■ 1� -� , �-� III IIYj��lll�� ■ ° ylae � � - �1, _na�u _ �aaD ■1111 :1pwll i ti�� t 1. �� 1 - °._ -i ii ' �4� � � �� 1 �I ■= 1� • uu� 1 ; \` \ci ,ter •N •■, ._■.:1111 o■a LII oil - • ••_ 1. � �� : :. — ref_ X1 7` _ =,c,�_� ��_ .. 11.11„ -��•� i rfin1W1u11 O: �'' -L l�l� � ► 1 ■1111 �Il��p C. �1 r, ll3llc�.7tli'.: _ ummilioll an tin -- 1i'�B �� I� 1 � 1 � 1 � Imp in milli � IIII�I� EifbIDl W,hiltil 17411111114 t � � �\ \� �►'��'" ■II:I�IGt la 11111r.rill .. 1°441,10 Si MU 4 Ilan ■F9 ■I�Ii11j111� �� ■r��•.�+f�- 11 Ila' ■B�I • �.._ si RlLeruwd .11116-1W _ , __ X111 . ny.� 5l ,_ AMA 41 I k r A - I I . 4 �.�- , ! ■ .��� �. C -- 1 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director CHAIR, ALLAN EKBERG, VICE CHAIR, GEORGE MALINA, COMMISSIONERS, MARGARET BRATCHER, BILL ARTHUR, HENRY MARVIN, LYNN PETERSON, AND CHUCK PARRISH PLANNING COMISSION AND PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JUNE 22, 2006 TUKWILA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS OPEN PUBLIC HEARING - 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ATTENDANCE III. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES — 05 -25 -06 IV. SWEARING IN OATH • V. PUBLIC WORKS Briefing on the Klickitat program VI. DCD Briefing on the wetlands mitigation PLANNING COMMISSION LOCATION: Steven M. Mullet, Mayor VII. CASE NUMBER: L06 -03.4 13.16 �I APPLICANT: Cingular Wireless REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to modify an existing wireless communication facility which will be located on an existing City Light transmission tower. The antennas will be located on the top of the transmission tower. In order to meet minimum clearance from the high voltage electrical lines, the existing tower will be extended five feet in height. The associated ground equipment will be located directly below the transmission tower in a 400 square foot enclosure. A chain -link fence with barbwire will enclose the 400 square foot enclosure. The enclosure will include a 256 square foot concrete pad where the cabinet equipment will be located. City Light transmission tower, adjacent to the United States Postal Facility and State Route 99. King County Parcel Number 042304 -9130 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda June 22, 2006 ' 5 -25-06 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: ` ✓d VIII. CASE NUMBER: L06 -030 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Modification of Chapter 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) regarding changing message signs at Public Facilities within the City. LOCATION: Citywide 5 -25 -06 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED: IX. CASE NUMBER: L06 -023 APPLICANT: City of Tukwila REQUEST: Creation of a "Wireless Telecommunications Chapter" within the City's Zoning code. The chapter will regulate the placement and operation of wireless communication facilities. The chapter will provide guidance on where such facilities can locate in the City, development standards, approval process, and exception criteria. LOCATION: Citywide X. DIRECTOR'S REPORT XI. ADJOURN • Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 • doc: DNS City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BI, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206)431 -3670 File Number: E06 -011 Appl ied: 06/09/2006 Issue Date: 06/28/2006 Status: APPROVED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) Applicant: BRANDON MILES Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: The City of Tukwila Department of Community Development is proposing to modify TMC Chapter 19 "Signs ". The modifications would permit public facilities to install electronic changing message displays. The proposed code amendments apply citywide. Location of Proposal: Address: 6300 SOUTHCENTER BL TUKW Parcel Number: 0003200005 41) Section/Township /Range: CITYWIDE The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. Woe 2? ) loo( Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) E06 -011 Printed: 06 -26 -2006 Brandon Miles - Proposed Development Regulations Page 1 • • From: Brandon Miles To: State Development Review Contact List Date: 6/29/06 4:40PM Subject: Proposed Development Regulations Please find attached proposed changes to the City of Tukwila's sign regulations. The CTED Notice and Draft ordinance is provided. Best Regards, Brandon J. Miles Assistant Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles@ci.tukwila.wa.us • • • June 27, 2006 Brandon Miles Assistant Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Miles: Anne Fritzel Growth Management Planner Growth Management Services Enclosure STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 128.10 Avenue SW • PO Box 42525 • Olympia. Washington 98504-2525 • (360) 7254000 Thank you for sending the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) the following materials as required under RCW 36.70A.106. Please keep this letter as documentation that you have met this procedural requirement. City of Tukwila - Proposed amendments to the sign code that would permit public facilities to install changing message signs within the entire city. These materials were received on 06/27/2006 and processed with the Material ID # 10516. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. If this is a draft amendment, adopted amendments should be sent to CTED within ten days of adoption and to any other state agencies who commented on the draft. If you have any questions, please call me at 360 725 -3064. Sincerely, £uula `ZUeyi • • FROM: RE DATE: ATTACHMENTS: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Planning Commission Staff Report Steve Lancaster, Director Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner Changing Message Signs June 8, 2006 A: Proposed Ordinance B: May Staff Report T Background At the May Planning Commission (PC) meeting staff briefed the PC on a proposed sign code modification. The Tukwila School District has requested to install a sign that changes images more frequently than once every 24- hours. Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) prohibits such signs. The School District noted that the main reason for the sign was to display important information to parents and students. The sign would also display messages in multiple languages to reflect the fact that there are 30- languges spoken in Tukwila schools. The Tukwila Parks and Recreation Department has also been interested in installing a changing message sign at the Tukwila Community Center (TCC). The purpose of such a sign would be to promote parks and recreation events Citywide. Purpose of the City's Sign Code The following are listed as the purpose of the City's sign code: 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. 2. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. Brandon -M Page 1 06/15/2006 Q: \Sign \School District \Code Language.doc Last printed 06/15/2006 3:52 PM Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • 3. To assure that the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulations. The Planning Commission requested information on the safety of changing message signs. While somewhat dated, the most comprehensive review of the safety impacts of changing message signs was conducted in 1980 by the Federal High Administration. The report, entitled, "Safety and Environmental Design Considerations in the Use of Commercial Electronic Variable- Message Signage ", notes the following: The review of reported research on highway safety considerations pertaining to roadside advertising demonstrates that studies based on accident investigations have generally had limited value because of: (1) lack of specific data relating accident locations to roadside features and traffic operational situations; or (2) sampling or statistical deficiencies. In addition, studies relying only or mainly on accident data often do not reflect such occurances as "near misses" or traffic impedances that are widely recognized as relevant to safety, and which may or may not be attributable to the presence of roadside advertising. While some accident studies have reported a positive relationship between accidents, high driving task demands, and the presence of roadside advertising, other studies have reached opposite conclusions. Although a trend in recent findings has begun to point to a demonstrable relationship between CEVMS and accidents, the available evidence remains statistically insufficient to scientifically support this relationship. • A review of other literature is also inconclusive to demonstrate if there are any safety impacts as a result of changing message signs. What should also be noted is that most of the safety studies that have been conducted nationwide are with regards to signs located along highways. Additionally, recently the State of Washington has been installing changing message signs along highways to inform drivers of traffic congestion, amber alerts, construction data, and other public information. Proposal Planning Staff has completed a draft ordinance to address the issue of changing message signs at public facilities. Again, as was noted at the May meeting, this proposed ordinance would apply to all public facilities within the City. Attachment "A" is the proposed ordinance and is in legislative format. New language that will be added is shown underline and deleted language is shown as s triketh r oug h Planning staff has listed the proposed changes in this staff report. Staff proposals the following: Modify TMC 19.04.020 to add the following purpose clause: Brandon -M Page 2 06/15/2006 Q: \Sign \School District \Code Language.doc Last printed 06/15/2006 3:52 PM • 2. The City desires to provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. • • Add language to the definition of animated signs (19.08.030): "Animated sign" means any sign or portion or which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animated at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date, or temperature or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300 shall not be construed to be animated. L �6 d 1 Add the following section to 19.32 "Regulations Based on Land Use Categories ". TMC.19.32.300 "Additional Sign Regulations for Public Facilities" A. Signs located at public facilities which meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.080 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided the following: 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of Tight, or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement. 3. If the public facility is located within a residential zone the use of the electronic portion of the siqn is limited to the hours of lam to 1 Opm. (Note: Any electronic sign in the City must meet the illumination and brightness levels set in TMC 19.16.035). B. Notice of Understanding 1. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Department signed by the appropriate manager /administrator that notes understanding of the above requirements and a assurance that the siqn will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in section 19.32.300 (A) (1 -3). C. Order of Removal Brandon -M Page 3 06/15/2006 Q: \Sign \School District \Code Language.doc Last printed 06/15/2006 3:52 PM • • • 1. The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way to violate the provisions of this chapter. Recommendation Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conclude the Public Hearing that started at the May meeting and that the proposed changes listed in the draft ordinance be forwarded with a recommendation of approval to the City Council. Alternatives The following alternative actions are available to the Planning Commission: 1. Continue the Public Hearing until the July meeting and request additional information from Planning Staff. 2. Any of the proposed alternatives which were listed in the May staff report (Attachment B). Brandon -M Page 4 06/15/2006 Q: \Sign \School District \Code Language.doc Last printed 06/15/2006 3:52 PM • • • DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AMENDING VARIOUS TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS RELATING TO SIGN CODE AND ANIMATED SIGNS; AMENDING PARTS OF ORDINANCE NO. # # # #, AS CODIFIED IN TMC SECTION # # # #; AMENDING PARTS OF ORDINANCE NO. # # ## AND # # ## AS CODIFIED IN TMC SECTION # # # #; AMENDING PARTS OF ORDINANCE # # ## AND # # ## CODIFIED IN TMC SECTION # # # #; ADDING NEW SECTIONS RELATED CHANGING MESSAGE SIGNS AT PUBLIC FACLITIES OF THE TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 19; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila desires to provide public agencies sign options to allow them to communicate with members of the public; WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila desires to update the sign code language to address signage in certain zones where signs are typically not found; WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila desires to protect safety and minimize driver distractions; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila wishes to regulate certain types of signage located at public facilities; WHEREAS, on May 25, 2006 and June 22, 2006 the Tukwila Planning Commission, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive testimony concerning amending the sign code and on June 22, 2006 adopted a motion recommending the proposed changes; WHEREAS, on , the Tukwila City Council, following adequate public notice, held a public hearing to receive a testimony concerning the recommendations of the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 19.04 ATTACHMENT A • • Sections: 19.04.010Title 19.04.020Purposes 19.04.030Liability for Damages 19.04.040Severability Clause GENERAL PROVISIONS 19.04.010Title This title shall be hereinafter known as the "Tukwila Sign Code "; it may be cited as such and will be hereinafter referred to as "this code." 19.04.020 Purposes The purposes of this code are: 1. To establish standards and guidelines for the design, erection and installation of signs and other visual communication devices so that the streets of Tukwila may appear orderly and safety may be increased by minimizing clutter and distraction. 2. The City desires to provide sign options that encourage public agencies to communicate with members of the public. 3. To establish administrative procedures for the implementation of this code. 4. To assure that the regulations of this code are not intended to permit any violation of the provisions of any other applicable federal, State or local regulation. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.04.030Liability for Damages Nothing in this code shall relieve any person, corporation, firm or entity from responsibility for damages to any other person suffering physical injury or damage to property as a result of the installation, display, maintenance or removal of any sign authorized under this code. The City and its employees and officials shall assume no liability for such injury or damage resulting from the authorization of any permit or inspection implementing the provisions of this code. (Ord. 1 274 §1(part), 1982) 19.04.040 Severability Clause If any section, subsection, clause or phrase of this code is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this code. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part). 1982) Chapter 19.08 (Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) Sections: 19.08.010 Generally 19.08.020Access Road 19.08.030Animated Sign 19.08.040Area and Background Area 19.08.050Billboard 19.08.052Commercial Zones 19.08.055Electronic Sign 19.08.060Exposed Building Face 19.08.070Freestanding Sign 19.08.080Freeway Interchange Business Sign 19.08.090Glare 19.08.100Height 19.08.105 Holographic Display 19.08.110Hotel 19.08.115Industrial Zones 19.08.1201nternal Information Sign 19.08.125 Museums 19.08.130Off- Premises Sign 19.08.1400n- Premises Sign 19.08.150Permanent Sign 19.08.160Planned Shopping Center (Mall) • 19.08.170Portable Sign 19.08.172Premises 19.08.175Public Facility 19.08.180Real Estate Sign 19.08.190Real Estate Directional Sign 19.08.192 Residential Zones 19.08.195 Scoreboard 19.08.200Shared Directional Sign 19.08.210Sign 19.08.215 Special Permission Sign 19.08.217 Sports Field 19.08.218 Sports Stadium 19.08.220Temporary Sign 19.08.230Traffic Markings 19.08.240Traffic Sign 19.08.260Unique Sign • DEFINITIONS 19.08.010 Generally Special words used in this code shall be defined as set out in this chapter. (Ord. 12 § (part), 1 19.08.020Access Road "Access road" means a driveway, as defined in TMC 18.06.015. t! )R RI. 1274 ;.l(pari) 1982) • • 19.08.030Animated Sign "Animated sign" means any sign or portion of which physically moves, appears to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or which appears to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portrays movement or animation at a frequency more rapid than once every 24 hours. Signs or portions of signs displaying a changing message content that is strictly limited to time, date or temperature or those permitted under TMC 19.32.300 shall not be construed to be animated. Scoreboards shall not be considered animated signs. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part), 2005; Ord. 2019 §1, 2003; Ord. 1274 §1(part). 1982) 19.08.040Area and Background Area "Area" and "background area" means the entire face of a sign or panel upon which copy or insignia may be placed. Where separate letters or shapes are used, the sign area shall be that encompassed by drawing lines at the extremities of the shapes to be used. (t)rd. 1274 § ((pert }. 1982) 19.08.050Billboard "Billboard" means a sign or visual communication device, its structure and component parts, whose principal use is the advertising or promotion of a service or product normally available in the general market area but not for sale or rent on the immediate premises. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.08.052 Commercial Zones "Commercial Zones" means any area of the City zoned 0, MUO, RCC, NCC, RC, RCM, TUC, C/LI and TVS. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part). 2005) 19.08.055Electronic Sign "Electronic Sign" means a sign containing a display that can be changed, by electrical, electronic or computerized process. (Ord. 2019 §2, 2003) 19.08.060Exposed Building Face "Exposed building face" means that portion of the building exterior wall or tenant space wall area of the building, together with one -half the vertical distance between eaves and ridge of a pitched roof above it, used for sign area calculation purposes as provided below: 1. That portion of the building wall fronting on the principal public street from which the building has access; or 2. That portion of the building wall which fronts on an access road; or • 3. That portion of the building wall wherein the principal public entrance to an individual tenant space within a multi- tenant building is located. ((.)rd. 127'l § §'1(part). 1982) 19.08.070 Freestanding Sign "Freestanding sign" means a sign installed on a permanent foundation, not attached to a building or other structure. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.08.080 Freeway Interchange Business "Freeway interchange business" means a business located within the areas designated on Exhibit A of this ordinance, situated within a radius of 1,000 feet from the freeway entry /exit point or industrial zone, but not separated by a physical barrier from the entry /exit intersection. The freeway interchange sign is primarily oriented to the passing motorist on the adjacent freeway, and shall identify businesses such as regional shopping malls, eating, lodging or service station facilities that serve the traveling public. No wall - mounted sign can be classified as a "freeway interchange business" sign. (Ord. 1 892 §1. 1999: ()rd, 1274 1 1 (part), 1982 ) 19.08.090 Glare "Glare" means the creation of an intense relative brightness exceeding 250 foot - lamberts which causes difficulty in the observation of the general area around the • sign. (Ord. 1274 § l (part), 1982) 19.08.100 Height "Height" means the distance measured from: 1. The lowest point of elevation of the ground between the top of the sign and a point five feet distant from said sign, or 2. The lowest point of elevation of the finished surface of the ground between the top of the sign and the property boundary, if it is less than five feet distant from said sign. (Old. 1274 § 1(parl ), 1982) 19.08.105 Holographic Display "Holographic display" means any display that creates a three - dimensional image through projection. (Ord. 2019 §3, 2003) 19.08.110 Hotel "Hotel" means a building or portion thereof designed or used as a transient rental facility as defined in TMC 18.06.440. (Ord. 1274 § 1(pait), 1982) 19.08.115 Industrial Zones "Industrial Zones" means any area of the City zoned LI, HI, MIC/L and MIC/H. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part). 2005) • • • 19.08.1201nternal Information Sign "Internal information sign" means a sign which gives directional information or identifies specific use areas and which is necessary to maintain the orderly internal use of the premises, such as those signs which identify employee parking, shipping, clearance or which restrict ingress and egress. Not included in this definition are signs which are not directly related to an identified need for orderly internal use of the property and off - premises or portable signs. (Ord. 1274 I (fart). 1 9 82) 19.08.125 Museums "Museums" means a non - profit institution where works of artistic, historical, and /or scientific value are cared for, kept and displayed. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part), 2005) 19.08.130Off- Premises Sign "Off- premises sign" means any sign which is not on the same premises as the business with which it is identified, or which cannot be classified as an on- premises sign under TMC 19.08.140. (Ord. 1857 §2, 1998; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.08.1400n- Premises Sign "On- premises sign" means a sign which displays advertising copy specifically related to a primary use of the premises on which it is located, including signs or sign devices indicating the business transacted at, services rendered, goods sold or produced on the immediate premises, name of the business, person, firm or corporation occupying the premises, including signs with adjustable copy known as readerboards. Said sign must be on the same premises as the business with which it is identified. (Ord. 1857 §3, 1998; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.08.150Permanent Sign "Permanent sign" means any sign which is erected without a restriction on the time period allowed for its display as specified in this code. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part). 1982) 19.08.160Planned Shopping Center (Mall) "Planned shopping center (mall)" means a multiple -tenant retail development as defined in TMC 18.06.750 (Shopping center, planned). (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.170Portable Sign "Portable sign" means a sign which is not permanently affixed to a structure and is designed for or capable of movement, except those signs explicitly designed for people to carry on their persons or permanently affixed to motor vehicles operating in their normal course of business. • (Ord. :1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.172 Premises "Premises" means one or more contiguous lots of record (exclusive of any right -of- way), owned or managed by the same individual or entity. (Ord. 1857 §1, 1998) 19.08.175 Public Facility "Public facility" means any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school, public library, community center, public park, government facility or similar use. (Ord. 1617 §2, 1991) 19.08.180Real Estate Sign "Real estate sign" means a sign displayed for a limited time and offering the immediate premises for sale, rent or lease. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.190 Real Estate Directional Sign "Real estate directional sign" means an off - premises sign displayed for a limited time and offering a particular property for sale, rent or lease. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) • 19.08.192 Residential Zones "Residential Zones" means any area of the City zoned LDR, MDR or HDR. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part). 2005) 19.08.195 Scoreboard "Scoreboard" means a visual communication device used to display the time, score, period, quarters, innings, downs, yards to go, and any other information directly relevant to a sporting event. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part), 2005) 19.08.200 Shared Directional Sign "Shared directional sign" means a directional sign erected and maintained by several adjacent businesses as a single sign. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.210 Sign "Sign" means any medium, including paint of walls, merchandise, or visual communication device, its structure and component parts, which is used or intended to be used to attract attention to the subject matter for advertising or identification purposes. Bulletin boards and readerboards are considered signs. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.215 Special Permission Sign "Special Permission Sign" shall mean a sign requiring a Type 2 decision as set forth in TMC 19.22.010, 19.22.020, 19.32.020, 19.32.080, 19.32.140, 19.32.150 or 19.32.180. (Ord. 2096 §1(part), 2005: Ord. 1770 §67. 1996) 19.08.217 Sports Field "Sports Field" means an outdoor area solely dedicated to function as a place for competitive sporting events such as but not limited to football, soccer, baseball and softball. (Ord. 2096 § 1(part), 2005) 19.08.218 Sports Stadium "Sports Stadium" means a permanent structure or complex that either partially or completely encloses a sports field and provides fixed seating, permanent restroom facilities, and permanent concession stands. (Ord. 2096 §1(part), 2005) 19.08.220Temporary Sign "Temporary sign" means a sign which is erected for a limited time and may be used to advertise business, community or civic projects, real estate for sale or lease, or other special events. • 19.08.230 Markings "Traffic markings" means all lines, patterns, words, colors or other devices except signs and power - operated traffic- control devices, set into the surface of, applied upon, or attached to the pavement or curbing or to objects within or adjacent to the roadway, placed for the purpose of regulating, warning or guiding traffic. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) • (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.240 Traffic Sign "Traffic sign" means a device mounted on a fixed or portable support whereby a specific message is conveyed by means of words or symbols placed or erected for the purposes of regulating, warning or guiding traffic. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) 19.08.260Unique Sign "Unique sign" means a building or other structure of unique design and exterior decor, where the entire structure may be considered an advertising device, including but not limited to shapes imitating hats, boots, tires, statues, parts of anatomy, or manufactured items such as airplanes, cars, boats, carriages, or symbols which may or may not contain lettering. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) • Chapter 19.32 REGULATIONS BASED ON LAND USE CATEGORIES Sections: I - GENERAL REGULATIONS 19.32.010 Generally 19.32.020 Shared Directional Signs 19.32.030 Signs in Underground Utility Easements and Corridors 19.32.040 Billboards - Area Restrictions 19.32.050 Exposed Neon Tubing - Use Restricted 19.32.060 Freestanding Signs - Proximity to Certain Zones 19.32.070 Freestanding Signs - Setback II - RESIDENTIAL ZONES 19.32.080 Home Occupation - Church, Approved Conditional Use and Public Facility Signs III - COMMERCIAL ZONES 19.32.140 Signs Located Outside of Residential Zones, Except as Provided in TMC 19.32.150 through TMC 19.32.190, Inclusive IV - PLANNED SHOPPING CENTERS (MALL) 19.32.150 Building Identification Signs - Displays 19.32.155 Identification Signs for the Center as a Whole V - SERVICE STATIONS 19.32.160 Surrounded by Commercial or Industrial Zones VI - INDUSTRIAL ZONES 19.32.170 Permitted Signs - Height VII - FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BUSINESSES 19.32.180 Permitted Signs - Height and Area Allowance VIII - HOTELS 19.32.190 Signs Mounted on Hotel Building Faces IX - VIDEO DISPLAYS 19.32.200 Video Displays at Sports Stadiums X — ADDITIONAL SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES 19.32.300 Electronic Message Boards I - GENERAL REGULATIONS 19.32.010 Generally The type, character, number, location and size of permanent signs varies with the land use category in which the signs are located. The land use categories are as established under Title 18 of this code. (Ord. 1274 S 1(part). 1982) • • • 19.32.020 Shared Directional Signs In commercial and industrial areas where a demonstrated need for directional signing exists, owners or tenants of these premises may apply for review and approval of the design of a shared directional sign. Such application shall be processed as a Type 2 decision. Such sign shal❑ not exceed ten feet in height, ten feet in width, and have a maximum of two signing surfaces which do not exceed a total of 50 square feet. Such sign shall be located on the premises of at least one of the entities identified thereon and shall be used only by geographically associated businesses. The sign structure shall be located in a masonry base of decorative appearance. The shared directional sign shall contain no promotional copy but shall be limited to the names and addresses of the companies or activities being identified. (Ord. 1770 $73, 1996; Ord. 1274 § l (part), 1982) 19.32.030 Signs in Underground Utility Easements and Corridors Where underground utility easements or corridors have been established, no signs shall be located in the corridor or easement except as specified in TMC 19.20.020C. (Ord. 1274 § l (part), 1982) 19.32.040 Billboards - Area Restrictions Billboards shall not exceed 300 square feet in area. All billboard structures shall be of "single- post" construction and shall be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the edge of the public right -of -way; a greater setback may be required by the Public Works Director to preserve adequate traffic safety sight distance. Billboards shall not be spaced less than 500 lineal feet apart. In addition, billboards shall be located only on the following street corridors and only within those portions thereof depicted on Exhibit B of this code: West Valley Highway (SR 181) south of S. 180th St. and Interurban Avenue north of the Interstates interchange. (Ord. 1274 §1 (part), 1982) 19.32.050 Exposed Neon Tubing - Use Restricted No exposed neon tubing shall be used where sign face is within 200 feet of a multiple- family or single- family zone. 19.32.060 Freestanding Signs - Proximity to Certain Zones No freestanding sign shall be located within 100 feet of a multiple - family or single- family zone, except as provided in TMC 19.32.080. (Ord. 2096 §5(part), 2005; Ord. 1274 § l (part), 1982) 19.32.070 Freestanding Signs - Setback Any freestanding sign shall be set back from all property lines a distance at least equal to the overall height of the sign, except for public facility signs as specified in TMC 19.32.080, and for signs allowed under the "freeway interchange businesses" sign provisions in TMC 19.32.180. Freeway interchange business signs may be located on the property in a location that does not conflict with on -site vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Freeway interchange business signs may be located within the area designated as the minimum setback requirement in its zoning classification. (Ord. 2096 §5(part), 2005; Ord. 1892 §4, 1999; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) II - RESIDENTIAL ZONES (Ord. 1274 § ((part). 1982) Area (L X 1[1) - Sq. Ft. Exposed Building Face Total Permitted Area of the Sign - Square Feet 0 -500 0.05 x exposed building face in sq. ft. (E.B.F.) 501 -1,500 25 + [0.04 x (E.B.F. - 500)] 1,501 -3,000 65 + [0.03 x (E.B.F. - 1500)] 3,001 -5,000 110 + [0.02 x (E.B.F. - 3000)] Over 5,000 150 square feet (maximum) • 19.32.080 Home Occupation - Church, Approved Conditional Use and Public Facility Signs A. Home occupations may be identified by a single, non - illuminated wall plaque of not more than 1-1/2 square feet. B. A church, conditional use, or public facility shall be permitted at least one wall sign and one freestanding sign or two wall signs. No wall may have more than one wall sign. One additional sign shall be allowed for each additional street frontage. Total area of the sign or signs for the use shall not exceed 50 square feet per sign; maximum height above ground, when in the setback area, shall not exceed 16 feet; minimum setback shall be eight feet; and the base of the sign shall be located in a landscaped area. Bulletin boards and readerboards are considered signs. Illuminated signs shall use indirect, concealed sources, or backlighted letters on an opaque background. C. Each multiple- family development may have one sign for the purpose of naming or otherwise identifying the project. Total area of the sign faces shall not exceed 32 square feet; maximum height above average grade, when in setback area, shall not exceed five feet; and base of the sign shall be located in landscaped area. Illuminated signs shall be front - lighted from concealed sources or back - lighted channel letters or back - lighted cut -out letters framed by an opaque cabinet or non - illuminated opaque sign panels. (Ord. 2096 §5(part); Ord. 1770 §74, 1996; Ord. 1617 §3(part), 1991; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) III - COMMERCIAL ZONES 19.32.140 Signs Located Outside of Residential Zones, Except as Provided in Section 19.32.150 through Section 19.32.190, Inclusive A. Signs mounted on exposed building faces. Each business shall be permitted one exposed building face - mounted sign. One additional exposed building face - mounted sign can be permitted for each business that is not identified on any freestanding sign, provided: 1. That the business has more than one exterior public entrance in the same building, exclusive of warehouse area doors, or 2. That there is no more than one sign per business on any exposed building face. B. The area of all signs on an exposed building face for each business shall be as provided in Table 1. Table 1 Upon application to and approval as a Type 2 decision, the permitted sign areas provided in Table 1 may be increased no more than 50% for each doubling of the required minimum setback distance for the wall upon which a particular sign is to be placed, but in no case shall sign area exceed that permitted in TMC 19.32.150. C. Office buildings with multiple tenancies shall be permitted signs as follows: 1. The total allowed signage area for any exposed building face shall be equal to the area given in Table 1. 2. Freestanding signs will be allowed as provided in TMC 19.32.140E. Street Frontage Sign Area/Sign Up to 200 ft. 50 sq. ft. with total of 100 sq. ft. for all sides 200 to 400 ft. 75 sq. ft. with total of 150 sq. ft. for all sides Over 400 ft. 100 sq. ft. with total of 200 sq. ft. for all sides • 3. Each business is permitted a maximum of two signs with not more than one sign for any particular business allowed on any one exposed building face. If the business is listed on a freestanding sign it will only be allowed one wall sign. 4. No one sign shall contain more than 50% of the allowable sign area, unless approved as a Type 2 decision. 5. Applicants for sign permits will be required to document the area of the exposed building face on which the sign is to be placed, total allowed sign area for that face, area of any existing signs, and area of the proposed sign. 6. Each tenant may also display a room number /letter or street number which is visible from the public street or principle access roadway. Such a sign shall not be counted in the sign area permitted for the business. 7. Each group of professional offices may have a directory listing the names of the tenants on the site and a location map. The directory shall be oriented to the pedestrian on the site rather than the passing motorist. D. Office building exception: Multi - tenant office buildings which will face or abut other commercial or industrial zones and which have no common public entry shall be permitted signs as follows: 1. Wall signs shall be allowed as provided in TMC 19.32.140A. 2. Freestanding signs will be allowed as provided in TMC 19.32.140E. 3. Each tenant may also display a room number /letter or street number which is visible from the public street or principle access roadway. Such a sign shall not be counted in the sign area permitted for the business. 4. Each group of professional offices may have a directory listing the names of the tenants on the site and a location map. The directory shall be oriented to the pedestrian on the site rather than the passing motorist. E. Freestanding signs: 1. One freestanding sign shall be permitted for each site. One additional free - standing sign may be permitted for sites that meet the following conditions: a. The site has at least 400 linear feet of frontage on a public street; b. The site has at least two detached commercial occupied buildings, neither of which is accessory to the other; and c. The site is occupied by at least two tenants. Permitted sign area for each freestanding sign shall be as follows: 2. A second freestanding sign may also be permitted if that sign is determined to be a freeway interchange business sign and has received or is eligible for a permit as such a sign. 3. Any permitted freestanding sign shall be limited in height to 35 feet, except signs determined to be a "freeway interchange business" sign, provided that no freestanding sign shall be higher than the building which it identifies or except as provided in TMC 19.32.150, 19.32.170 and 19.32.180. • • • F. The freestanding sign shall contain no promotional copy but shall be limited to the name of the company or activity being identified and trademark or logo, except where an approved readerboard is used. G. Non - rolling equipment must be displayed from within buildings or glass fronted cases, except in connection with temporary commercial, industrial or public service displays. (Ord. 1892 §5, 1 999; Ord. 1773 §1, 1996; ()rd. 1770 §78, 1996; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) IV - PLANNED SHOPPING CENTERS (MALL) 19.32.150 Building Identification Signs - Displays A. Individual businesses in a planned shopping center (mall) shall be limited to wall mounted signs. The total allowed signage for any building face shall be equal to 6% of the exposed building face area on which the signs are to be placed, up to a maximum of 500 square feet. Each business is permitted a maximum of four signs with not more than one sign for any particular business allowed on any one exposed building face. No one sign shall contain more than 50% of the allowable sign area, unless approved as a Type 2 decision. Applicants for sign permits will be required to document the area of the exposed building face on which the sign is to be placed, total allowed sign area for that face, area of any existing signs, and area of the proposed sign. B. Businesses located on the perimeter of a planned shopping center (mall) in detached, separate buildings shall be allowed freestanding signs per TMC 19.32.140E. (Ord. 1773 §2, 1996; Ord. 1770 §79, 1996; Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) 19.32.155 Identification Signs for the Center as a Whole Identification signs for the center as a whole shall have an aggregate area of not more than 300 square feet per street which abuts the development, and no one sign shall contain more than 50% of the allowable sign area, unless approved as a Type 2 decision. The height of a freestanding sign shall not exceed the highest portion of any building in the planned shopping center (mall) which is identified thereby. Non - rolling equipment and merchandise must be displayed from within buildings or glass- fronted cases, except in connection with a temporary commercial, industrial or public service display. VI - SERVICE STATIONS (Ord. 1773 §3, 1996) 19.32.160 Surrounded by Commercial or Industrial Zones Where service stations are located across the street from or abut commercial or industrial zones, the following requirements are applicable: 1. One freestanding, lighted, double -faced identification sign not exceeding 150 square feet for the total of all faces with no one face exceeding 75 square feet is permitted. Such sign shall not exceed a height of 35 feet. The sign shall be lighted only during business hours. 2. One sign mounted on an exposed building face is permitted for each street frontage and shall not exceed 20% of the exposed building face area to which it is attached. Such face - mounted signs may be illuminated. 3. Two unlighted double -faced signs not exceeding 20 square feet per face are permitted. Such signs shall be non - portable and may be used for advertising copy customarily displayed in service stations. 4. In addition to the above regulations, the following signs are allowed without permit: • • • a. Signs at each pump island denoting the type of fuel, price and service available, providing such signs are permanently mounted to pumps or pump island structures. b. Signs on roll -away type racks advertising merchandise in such racks. Examples include tire racks, batteries, bulk oil sales, etc. Such signs are limited to two square feet. (Ord. 1274 §1(part), 1982) VI - INDUSTRIAL ZONES 19.32.170 Permitted Signs - Height Signs shall be as described under TMC 19.32.140, except that height of a freestanding sign permitted for the first ten acres is 45 feet. (Ord. 1274 §I (part), 1982) VII - FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BUSINESSES 19.32.180 Permitted Signs - Height and Area Allowance The maximum allowed message area for a freeway interchange business sign is 125 square feet per face or a total of 250 square feet for all faces of the sign. The minimum height allowed for a freeway interchange business sign shall be 35 feet and the maximum height shall be 125 feet. The minimum and maximum height for a freeway interchange sign includes any and all message areas attributable to the business the sign advertises. No portion of the message area, including logos, text or other advertisements, for the freeway interchange sign may be located below 35 feet on the freeway interchange business sign. VII - HOTELS (Ord. 1892 §6, 1999; Ord. 1274 § I (part), 1982) 19.32.190 Signs Mounted on Hotel Building Faces A. Each hotel shall be permitted one building face - mounted sign on each building face of the hotel, which sign shall contain only the hotel name and/or logo. The area of each building face - mounted sign shall be as provided in Table 1 of TMC 19.32.140A. A hotel may not have more than four building face - mounted signs, except as provided in TMC 19.32.190B. For the purpose of this subsection, "building face" shall be defined as provided in TMC 19.08.060 without the limiting requirements of subsections 1, 2 and 3 thereof. B. If a hotel has a restaurant operation which is located in the hotel building, then the hotel shall be permitted one additional exposed building face - mounted sign within the area as provided in Table 1 of TMC 19.32.140B; provided, that the sign is placed on the ground floor of the exposed building face and identifies only the restaurant name. C. A hotel shall be permitted freestanding and internal information signs as provided in TMC 19.32.140E and TMC Chapter 19.22, respectively. (Ord. 1274 § 1(part), 1982) IX — VIDEO DISPLAYS 19.32.200 Video Displays at Sports Stadiums A. Scoreboards as permitted by TMC 19.12.050 (17) are permitted to have a video display provided they meet the following requirements: 1. The scoreboard and the video display must be a single integrated structure. vVot\AV, • 2. Video displays are only permitted at sports stadiums that have a seating capacity of at least 2,000 persons or greater. Such stadiums must be located in the LDR zone and have a Public Recreation Overlay. 3. Only one scoreboard with video display is permitted per field. 4. The video display may only be used between the hours of 8:O0AM and 11:O0PM. 5. The entire scoreboard with video display cannot exceed 200 square feet. 6. The scoreboard with video display must face away from the public right- of -way, public trails, adjacent properties, and water bodies. The video display must have minimal visibility from adjacent properties, public rights -of -way, and public trails. The video display cannot have a negative impact on the quiet enjoyment of surrounding residential properties, as determined by the Director of DCD. 7. The scoreboard with video display must meet the setbacks requirement of TMC 19.32.070. 8. Such video display must meet the illumination and brightness limitations for electronic signs set forth in TMC 19.32.035. 9. The sign must meet the height standards of TMC 19.32.140E.3. 10. Such scoreboards with video display shall be permitted as a Type II decision. The following information must be submitted for approval of the Type II decision: a. An application form provided by the City of Tukwila; b. A written narrative regarding compliance with the requirements in TMC 19.32.080; c. A site map drawn to scale with north arrow, showing the location of the proposed sign, property lines, and adjacent public rights -of -way; d. Elevations of the proposed sign drawn to an appropriate scale; e. Appropriate engineering documents, if the sign requires structural engineering. (Ord. 2096 §5(part), 2005) X — ADDITIONAL SIGN REGULATIONS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES 19.32.300 Electronic Message Boards A. Signs located at public facilities which meet the criteria of TMC 19.32.300 may use the sign as a changing message sign, provided the following. 1. The image on the sign may not change more frequently than once every ten seconds. 2. The image must appear and disappear as one image. The image may not appear to flash, undulate, pulse, or portray explosions, fireworks, flashes of light, or blinking or chasing lights, or appear to move toward or away from the viewer, to expand or contract, bounce, rotate, spin, twist, scroll, travel or otherwise portray movement 3. If the public facility is located within a residen • of the electronic portion of the sign is limited to the hours of lam to 10 B. Notice of understanding 1. Any public facility that installs and operates a changing message sign must submit a letter to the Department signed by the appropriate manager /administrator that notes understanding of the above requirements and a assurance that the sign will be used in the appropriate manner as stated in section 19.32.300(A)(1 -3) 4 C. Order of Removal 1. The Director of Community Development shall order the removal of any sign constructed pursuant to TMC 19.32.300 if the sign is used in such a way to violate the provisions of this chapter. \J� �� (ItAta' 0 1* P„t 6 -15 -06 10 L06 -037, Nickel Fund Improvements • • I have the following comment on this project: Storm water will be discharged to the old river channel (Nelson Side Channel). This area is designated as a Zone AH with an elevation of 18 on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. This area is a closed depression and the water elevation appears to be tied to the river by groundwater migration. This project will be required to obtain a Tukwila Flood Permit and the flood elevation the City uses for this channel is the flood elevation of the river (approximately 22.8). This increased flood elevation is due to the closed nature of this system and the possibility that the disconnected side channel will be reconnected to the river in the future. Ryan City of Tukwila Department of Community Development Planning Commission Staff Report FROM: Steve Lancaster, Director Brandon Miles, Assistant Planner RE: Changing Message Signs DATE: May 5, 2006 I n)J t4c$ ( 0 ersi9; Issue The City has been approached by the Tukwila School District to amend Title 19 of the Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) to permit signs which change more frequently than once every 24- hours. The School District proposes to install an electronic message center at Foster High School. Analysis of Existing Code Title 19 of the TMC regulates all types of signage in the City. Unless specifically listed as exempted, a sign permit is required for all types of signs that are discernable from adjacent properties and the City's rights of way (TMC 19.12.010). Any permanent signs, either freestanding or wall sign are required to have a sign permit. In all commercial and industrial zones most business, if they qualify, can have two signs. The business can choose from two wall signs or a freestanding and wall sign. The City applies different development standards for signs located in residential zones. Under TMC 19.32.080 churches, schools, public facilities, and conditional uses may have one sign for every street they front. No sign may be greater than 50 square feet in size. The sign may either be a wall or freestanding sign. Any use in the City may have an electronic message center as part of the sign. However, under TMC 19.08.030, if the sign changes more frequently than once every 24- hours, the sign would be considered an animated sign. Animated signs are strictly prohibited in the City (TMC 19.28.010). Tukwila School District has proposed an electronic message sign that would change copy more than once every 24 -hours and thus would not be permitted in the City. Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Steve Lancaster, Director ( Brandon -M Page 1 05/18/2006 Q: \Sign \School District \Planning Commission Staff Report.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • e Discussion Tukwila's land use regulations attempt to minimize impacts within residential zones by restricting certain activities. All schools in the City are located and are adjacent to Low Density Residential zoned land. Schools provide a sense of community and a gathering place for City residents. Events that occur at schools, provide opportunities for Tukwila residents to interact. Placing a changing message sign, such as what the School District is proposing would allow the District to advertise many events that benefit the community. The City limits many activities that occur within residential zones. Most commercial operations are excluded, home occupations are permitted but under very specific conditions, and almost all non - residential uses that may locate in residential zones require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Options 1. No Action. The Planning Commission could choose to take no action, in which case the proposed sign, if erected, would be limited to no more than one message change per day. No flashing, blinking, scrolling or other message movement would be allowed. The School District has indicated that they would not construct the sign under these circumstances. 2. Modify the definition of "animated sign ". The definition could be modified to allow changing messages more frequently than once every 24- hours. The Planning Commission could also consider relaxing restrictions on flashing, scrolling or other effects. Any modification to the definition would apply citywide. 3. Exemption for community event announcements. 3A. Allow any otherwise permitted sign within the City to display changing messages but limit the message to public service announcements. For example, the City of Lacey allows public service signs to have changing message signs. "Public service signs in the form of changing message center signs may be permitted. However, the changing message center signs shall not be used for commercial purposes, such as to advertise a product, service, or use. Messages will be strictly limited to public information regarding activities, events, time, date, temperature, atmospheric condition and news of interest to the general public. Said signs shall be limited to the type, size, shape, and location specified for the zoning district in which said signs are located'. Brandon -M Page 2 Q: \Sign \School District \Planning Commission Staff Report.doc 05/18/2006 • • Conclusion 3B. Allow only public facilities to have changing message signs. This would allow the school district to construct a changing message sign. It would also allow for all schools, libraries, and City buildings such as City Hall and the Community Center to have a changing message sign. The term "public facility" is defined in TMC 19.08.175 to mean any facility funded with public funds which provides a service to the general public, including but not limited to a public school, public library, community center, public park, government facility or similar use. Most of public facilities are located within residential zones. Staff has provided an attached map which shows all schools, City facilities, libraries, and utility district offices within the City. The City currently exempts changing message signs limited to "time, date and temperature" from the City's animated sign prohibition. The City could extend this exemption to also allow changing messages relating to "community events or announcements. It should be noted that the courts have been increasingly critical of government sign regulations that base privileges or restrictions upon the content of the message. 4. Eliminate prohibition of animated signs. The Planning Commission could recommend the prohibition against animated signs for the entire City be removed. Staff requests that the Planning Commission provide direction with regard to a possible sign code amendment, after a conducting a public hearing. �.� � � elccVOn L 5 S`1 O cV4/101 .� L >nn - Arid Ot(-- 1,1t%aLk Ac_ tr&A.Vd .91 6(A Pil I Vil \1cQ VP" . 1,1 111/ N L„ G J7 _Nivrw Nit:43,1 oily (At, vitfrxtk $ viq , 'r ;J SC( s 1�"►,4R ( h� SiWi lib ;11 0f 0�1 + Brandon -M Page 3 Q: \Sign \School District \Planning Commission Staff Report.doc 05/18/2006 Public Facilities Eligible for a Changing Message Sign \ �®11KI111111 = 1 �\Iin t, CM 11 �. RC k nn I illilili�li!lellllll_ZII: O .* 6. am r % 11 p �r;'1I11K1 l " \� \ (iii =�1R ►' . :ill MIllu a il m ■ \� .. =Ewan II. iii ■Illlrl ;1ji3 �=" � il ,-• ■ I ` m i . Li ' f _ ill 1 �` lUt ti��l ■ °1 p :1I�'� 'i.� ♦ I /n om �-� R J .Lrlrsl —:::II .r.�. �� 11 1 111 a„y� : .! lemlaur���■ / mt. v�.... 111111. ■ �RI I ® - r Ll? 5 + n I1 :u 1��■ �_ I A i �� a = r7- _� ,- / "_+ ■I. iw u 1 1 �Id11 IIE I \ L _`� Roy . ■11 !; !11 II . mum � � it -2.117 An.. I. ao_ 1 ' : i LI 1 = 6= 7 met4444,\ emu I _I�II� .II " 11'�I?�+ ��1 _I_II_Ld ::1111■ 1 -1111 i1� _�_� __. ■...1 ■ .e. ...w -w1 1 ii l I :I r i O� �11I11�111 � w.r 11= ,_I —�� t I ` 11: J ���1 1 11 r 1 0 ��NM -= —_ i =a Ili— �e ���Lll r- x:1111 =11� IJIIJI� ; �Eimlulllt _ - 'owl :itt u�' ■ = ■,� •� �� ..r c. +rmnnnn= a�°IIL'1 �' w•r 1!IIK I III I rrlO.11 ■ ■ � I■1 vlllltil t —'' = 10. �n1��1111 ■11� ■r . ..� l :N.. 1 11 �1 �nlu -.r r- Wag �. \ . II 1 `, ' ' �► ���4 X1 1`:.11 1 �.1ii ®l � � ■.;� -... ` 4. � // 111 ■11 ri�. � �"' �_ r r 47//�nl� u p A ii 1� iNii:1 ■ mal l 11111.11 ■ i I � 11f11`'111�G1�1w' - - - I■■ � r l ��+�� ' ��i ►'� �� ill'' ��� � � �c ■� ■III� p 1 l�ii i 1 ► 4 . - If =1111 �' � �` \�� \� `I _ � rI \A . ... il u a I 1I' r te ,. - = _— � I \ I l i �lluu�� ESE, llil:i:�� � �1 , � � � :�� 111 �1 ^n__!eili -�•� .1.11.1., r -17 11 \ \,, z I - . ria ■' lipI'- ortmus a'i \LL'Ii 1:, ii� ■■1111 ,111l1I il■I■1i11JIlls 1 . . I :n =1:: MI1111,110X Ainini f r � . 11lll■Nyl �i■ .-- rel .■rrr� -v V� ��� ■■ lailt. 111Frep Steve Lancaster - Please forward on our behalf Page 1 • • • From: "Bill Vandebogert" < VandebogertB @tukwila.wednet.edu> To: <slancaster @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Date: 5/22/06 2:21 PM Subject: Please forward on our behalf If you would be so kind as to email this information to committee members, prior to Thursday. I want to make sure we don't surprise them with information. I expect two or three others to join us on Thursday. Thank you for your help. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me. CC: <mfertakis @comcast.net >, <wcory@comcast.net >, "Scott Erdahl" <ErdahlS @tukwila.wednet.edu >, "James Hammond" <Hammondj @tukwila.wednet.edu >, "George Ilgenfritz" < IIgenfritzG @tukwila.wednet.edu >, <jasminkakujundzic @ yahoo.com>, <pmaltsberger2000 @yahoo.com >, <wahlsea @yahoo.com> Steve Lancaster - Clarification .doc Page 1 MEMO TO: Planning Commission Committee Members FROM: Bill Van De Bogert, Tukwila School District Business Manager Email vandebogertb @tukwila.wednet.edu, Phone 206 -901 -8003 DATE: May 22, 2006 RE: Replacement of Existing Message Board in Front of Foster High School With An Electronic LED Message Board. I recognize the need to process our request through appropriate permitting channels and want to thank you for allowing the district this opportunity to share our thoughts on the subject of an electronic message board. The success of public schools is in part dependent upon the schools ability to communicate activities and events to its citizens in a timely manner. LED message boards have become the common communication tool to that end. Throughout King County school districts and high schools in particular, have understood that LED message boards provide a quick and inexpensive way to communicate events in multiple languages I hope this information provides you greater understanding of the value an LED message board offers the parents and students at Foster High School. We hope you find in your hearts more reasons to approve our purchase than reasons not. We truly understand the installation of an LED message board at Foster High School may not be desirable by all but we feel that other communities have found ways to make exceptions to benefit public schools, and that Tukwila might embrace the same reasons. The existing reader board which is nine feet long and six feet high is a manual display system which limits types and frequency of messages. A new LED system would allow the district to communicate multiple messages about school activities to Tukwila families. Tukwila does not have a dedicated community newspaper to dispense information to families, and absent that communication vehicle an LED message board would provide the district with a simple method which bridges that communication void and permits the dissemination of information in multiple languages. The cost for a new LED Board is approximately $28,000, and measures eight feet long and four feet high which is smaller than the existing message board. The actual LED display is two feet high and runs the length of the board. The display can operate three lines of letters, each line can hold 19 characters, and can be changed as frequently as desired. The District is sensitive to permitting rules for LED message boards within the city. Permitting rules which are understandably based on the need to limit the size and types of LED displays along city streets, and the District agrees with the city's rationale to control electronic signs. If left unchecked, undesirable flashing animated signs could become the predominant feature along Hwy. 99, and turn an otherwise simple business district into an unattractive Las Vegas style strip with flashing lights and neon signs operating all night long. We think by working together with the permitting department we can protect city restrictions, and maintain the spirit and integrity built into the existing rules around LED signage. The School District's desire to install an LED message board is based on criteria altogether different than a for -profit business, and unique because public schools are created and chartered for the soul purpose and at the discretion of the tax payers within a city to serve the public interests A. That the information displayed is for community tax payers who own the charter to operate the schools. B. To disseminate District activity & event information to citizens under the umbrella of a non - profit public agency, not a for - profit business. C. The district is receptive to limiting operating times of the LED board to certain hours each day. (Example 7AM to IOPM) D. the District is receptive to limiting animation and flashing background displays which can be unattractive. The Steve Lancaster - Clarification .doc 7 district would display only straight letter messaging. E. the District desires to find an effective medium to communicate in multiple languages and believes the most cost effective method to that end is an LED board. Our desire would be to structure an agreement that meets our needs, while maintaining the spirit of the city's (TMC 19.08.030) animated code conditions. I've also attached my PowerPoint for Thursday's meeting. It is short, but shows committee members the type of information that could be displayed to citizens. If you have any questions please feel free to call upon me. Again thank you Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 1 • • • Foster High Schoo Parent Conferences November 15th Showalter Middle School S teve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 2 • • • Foster High Schoo CONFERENCIAS PARA PADRES DE FAMILIA 15 DE NOVIEMBRE Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 3 • • • Foster High School CONFERENCIAS PARA PADRES DE FAMILIA 15 DE NOVIEMBRE S teve. Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 4 • Fall Football Begins August 12th FattO IN iii rgtitifillitfib 1 Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 5 • • • First Day of School FOstPIfI t h 001 Steve 'Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 6 • • ° gistration Begins August 22nc Showalter FostI1Hsg hlSch ool Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt • • • Foster High Schoo Immunization Records Birth Certificate Social Security Card Page 7 Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 8 • • • Foster High Schoo November 18th at 8:00 PM Drama Department Presents "Showboat" Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 9 • • • Foster High School Ticket Cost $5.00 Three Nights Visit District Web Page Steve Lancaster - City Presentation.ppt Page 10 • • Foster High School or Call the ASB Office For more information • ( P IGNTECH � J , Campus Business Center - .DJi - 0 i 33759 9th Ave. S Federal Way, WA 98003 King Co.: (253) 874 -0746 Pierce Co.: (253) 952 -6559 ,Fax: (25.3) 838 -1,522 Sign S Slectric.L GQntrQQtQr6, • Revisions: Yes No❑ Designer: Jason TaInr Salesman: Bryon Tien File Name:Ittosterhigh approval FO OT9111 E4 HIGH SCHOOL LED DISITRL monoCItfJDln@ ITE&SI SE DIETER • Location: Fester High Srhoel Address: 4,42 Small 144th Sr TJcwila, WA 98168 Date: 94/19/06 Client Approval: Date. • • JOBiVAME: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Colors shown in this representation are not necessarily the true colors used on the final product. This design presentation is the property of Sign -Tech Electric LLC. © Sign -Tech Electric 2003 All rights to use, alter, or reproduce are prohibited without written permission. • ( P IGNTEH Campus Business Center EL 33759 9th Ave. S Federal Way, WA 98003 King Co.: (253) 874 -0746 Pierce Co.: (253) 952 -6559 .Fax: (253) 83&1,522 Sign S Electrical Centrrctcrs Qty (1) Double sided cabinet sign with LED message center. (A) Internal lit aluminum cabinet with poly carb faces and translucent vinyl graphics. Cabinet Painted black. (B) 2 led 19mm monochrome message centers (C) Bolt plate. Existing bolt plate may be used if existing pole is used. Bolt plate painted Pantone Reflex Blue. (D) Steel pipe. Existing pipe may be used. Steel pipe painted Pantone - Reflex Blue. (E) Aluminum access panel for service maintanace Vinyl Colors: L Silver Gray PMS #877 IN Blue PMS #2946 11 Black Revisions: Yes No❑ Designor:Jasoo Ta1or Salesman• Risen With Filo Nama:jt ferterhigh approval Location: F High Crhnol Address: 4242 Smith 144th St Tukwila, WA 98168 Date:D4/19106 (A) H- 1 G H— SCHOOL - LED ®IIHRL MCC MI RESUME OMEN Client Approval. Date • SCALE: • JOB NAME: FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL 2' Colors shown in this representation are not necessarily the true colors used on the final product. This design presentation is the property of Sign -Tech Electric LLC. © Sign-Tech Electric 2003 All rights to use, alter, or reproduce are prohibited without written permission. • • • South FACES (Family And Children Early Support) Child Development Pilot Project funded by United Way of King County and supported by South FACES Final Report June 12, 2005 Written by Ginger Kwan Associates In Cultural Exchange 200 West Mercer Street, Suite 108 Seattle, WA 98119 ■ • • • • South FACES (Family And Children Early Support) Child Development Pilot Project funded by United Way of King County and supported by South FACES Final Report June 12, 2005 • Written by Ginger Kwan Associates In Cultural Exchange 200 West Mercer Street, Suite 108 Seattle, WA 98119 ■ 7ilveorl-ADA • • • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL CONFERENCIAS PARA PADRES DE FAMILIA 15 DE NOVIEMBRE FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Parent Conferences November 15th, 7:00 PM Showalter Middle School FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL po,gITensi KOH($epeHWI NLIirTIO -ro B3171$1,11 KacKa,ga B Hosl6pe 1 • • • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Fall Football Begins August 12th 10:00 AM Neudorf Stadium FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL New Student Registration Begins August 22n at Showalter, Please Bring FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Immunization Records Birth Certificate Social Security Card 2 • • • FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Recepcion al primer dia de la escuela de septiembre el 5th FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL November 18 at 8:00 PM Drama Department Presents "Showboat" FOSTER HIGH SCHOOL Free Flu Shots to Community Members County Nurses Association 3 TO: Brandon Miles • FROM: Bill Van De Bogert 206 - 940 -7795 Cell Phone • • DATE: June 2, 2006 MEMO RE: Please feel free to share this data with the planning committee. They may also be interested in the information. The information you have requested from the school district is attached. I hope it provides you with a better understanding of the client base the school district is serving. The districts mission is to serve the students and parents of the community and we have for many years watching the ethnic makeup of our student population shift to more families do not speak English at home. INDEX of ENROLLMENT DATA HOME LANGUAGE REPORT (Home language as reported by parents and students on registration forms) SUMMARY LANGUAGE PAGE (Pupil Services Department Data Sheet) 1. Identification of ethnic makeup of student population 2. Identification of the majority of language groups within the school district A. 2005 -06 Foster High School student enrollment data, 1. The report summarizes the total number of students who have enrolled during the year and provides the names of each entering student along with associated detail. (Note* if you go over the names of the families in the report note the ethnic makeup of the students. Many are Bosnian, Somalia, Latino the three primary ethnic groups in our schools.) B. 2005 -06 Foster High School student withdrawal data, 1. The report summarizes the total number of students who have withdrawal from Foster High School this year. The report also provides the names of each student who has withdrawn. C. 2005 -06 Showalter Middle School student enrollment data, 1. The report summarizes the total number of students who have enrolled during the year and provides the names of each entering student along with associated detail. D. 2005 -06 Showalter Middle School student withdrawal data, 1. The report summarizes the total number of students who have withdrawal from Foster High School this year. The report also provides the names of each student who has withdrawn. E. Family & Children Development Report (United Way and the Latino Community Study) F. Kindergarten through 4th Grade Attrition Trending (Curriculum Department Data Sheet) • South FACES (Family And Children Early Support) Child Development Pilot Project funded by United Way of King County and supported by South FACES Final Report June 12, 2005 Written by Ginger Kwan Associates In Cultural Exchange 200 West Mercer Street, Suite 108 Seattle, WA 98119 Summary of the Project Page 3 Background Page 5 Demographics of the Pilot Site and Participants Page 7 Methodology Page 10 Key Findings Page 14 Lessons/Barriers Learned Page 23 Recommended Actions Page 25 Acknowledgement Page 27 Attachments Page 28 Table of Contents 2 • • I Summary of the Pilot • • This report summarizes the South FACES Child Development Pilot Project that focused on Spanish- speaking families living in City of Tukwila, King County, Washington. The project was designed to enhance our understanding of Latino families' experiences in raising young children, of their perceptions and attitudes towards schools, and of how these families seek help and gain access to information and resources in their community. Forty -nine families (fifty -seven people) were recruited to participate in three focus group interviews and twenty -three individual interviews during the period of January 2005 to April 2005. Two of the three focus groups took place at a school with on -site child care and meals provided to participants. There were nineteen families in these two focus group interviews. The third one had seven families and was conducted in a family home. The individual interviews occurred at different places including individual homes, Mexican restaurants, and other places convenient to the participants. The project hired five bilingual female informal community leaders to recruit forty - nine Spanish- speaking families to participate in the interviews. These families were chosen because they were living in City of Tukwila and had at least one child under age of six. In addition to recruiting participants, three out of five informal community leaders also attended the focus groups. Input from the families in the interviews led to identification of significant barriers and challenges that many Latino families face on the daily basis in regard to raising children, schooling, and community living. These challenges are: Language barrier: There is a lack of bilingual Spanish translators and interpreters at schools and in the community. This makes it difficult for families to access information and resources they need in order to become involved in schools and community affairs. It also inhibits their ability to be connected with the mainstream culture and with services that would otherwise be available to them. • Discrimination and racism: The perception of many Latino families is that they are being discriminated against because of their culture and language. They feel frustrated and humiliated because of the discriminatory remarks directed at them. • Lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate programs and services for Latino families: Many parents would like to see programs designed to meet their needs as a family. The data gathered from the interviews indicated that in Tukwila community, there is a wide gap between the needs of Latino families and the resources available to them. We recommend the following actions to South FACES and encourage South FACES to work collaboratively with other South King County community members to bridge the gap: 1. Design services and programs that meet Latino family's values and needs. 2. Increase the number of bilingual Spanish- speaking professionals working in the social services, education system, and health care. 3. Collaborative with Latino families to establish a Spanish resource center where families can network, receive language assistance, take classes, such as ESL and children's programs, and get information and services they need. 4. Develop strategies to reform the current system to eliminate institutional racism for Latino families and all other ethnic groups. 5. Seek funding to implement the recommended actions. The conclusion drawn from this Pilot project is that following the above recommendations will result in a culturally competent delivery service. 4 • • • • • • South FACES Child Development Pilot Background South FACES is a consortium of early childhood educators, providers, agencies, fund - raisers, and advocates who meet monthly to coordinate efforts to support early childhood learning, school readiness and family support. During 2003, South FACES was a partner in an exciting countywide collaborative project that developed An Early Childhood and School Readiness Action Agenda for King County. Conveners of the collaborative project included Project Lift -Off and United Way of King County Children's Initiative — now SOAR, helping kids reach for the sky - -, the Foundation for Early Learning, The Seattle Foundation and the Project Lift -Off Opportunity Fund. The Action Agenda has been recently adopted by SOAR as the centerpiece of their agenda for Early Childhood and School Readiness. The Action Agenda includes countywide strategies as well as specific sub - regional strategies for each of the four sub- regions in King County: Seattle, North King, East King, and South King. South FACES focuses on two goals that have been identified as effective in assuring that all children, ages 0 -6, enter school prepared to reach their full social, emotional, physical, and academic potential. These goals are for 1. children to have strong bonds and nurturing relationships with their parents /guardians and other significant adults in their lives. 2. children and families most in need of services to receive as early as possible high quality, affordable and culturally competent services. Scope of Pilot Project In November 2004, South FACES contracted with the Associates in Cultural Exchange (A.C.E.) to design and implement the Child Development Pilot Project in Tukwila with Spanish speaking families having young children (age 0 — 6). The pilot was designed to understand three major issues, which include: • Latino families' attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about child development including special needs and developmental delays that impact them to prepare their young children to be ready for school; • Latino families' experiences, attitudes, and perceptions toward schools and expectations of family involvement in their children's education and; • How Latino families seek help and access resources and information in the Tukwila community. The expected outcomes of the pilot were to: • Increase parent, caregiver and early childhood providers' knowledge about early childhood development. • Increase caregivers' and early childhood providers' knowledge about Latino cultures. • Build neighborhood connections and strengthen informal supports. • Improve access to support, information and effective services to identify and respond to developmental needs of the child. With the findings of this work, South FACES will be able to further the primary strategy of engaging diverse community organizations and leaders in learning about culturally competent prevention, early intervention and assessment services so they can provide better information and referrals to parents and families with young children (identified in the KC Action Agenda). 6 • • • Demographics of the Pilot Site: City of Tukwila Tukwila City was chosen by the South FACES group to conduct the pilot because of its diverse population and smaller number of residents. Below is the Census 2000 profile of General Demographic Characteristics of Tukwila City. City of Tukwila Population 17,181 Total population 17, 181 100% One race 16,062 93.5% White 10, 074 58.6% Black or African American 2,198 12.8% American Indian and Alaska Native 223 1.3% Asian 1,870 10.9% Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander 312 1.8% Some other race 1,385 8.1% Two or more races 1,119 6.5% Hispanic or Latino Population in Tukwila in 2000 079% 58% ®White (10,074) O Black or African American (2,198) DAmerican Indian or Alaskan Native (223) ❑Asian (1,870) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander (312) ❑Other Race (1,385) CI Two or More Races (1,119) O Mexican 1,829 Puerto Rican 29 ❑ Cuban 17 ❑ Other Hispanic or Latino 454 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 17,181 100% Hispanic or Latino (or any race) 2,329 13.6% Mexican 1,829 10.6% Puerto Rican 29 0.2% Cuban 17 0.1% Other Hispanic or Latino 454 2.6% Not Hispanic or Latino 14,852 86.4% White alone 9,297 54.1% In the year of 2000, there were 2,329 Hispanics or Latinos living in the City of Tukwila. Among them, the 1,829 Mexican residents represented 79% of its total Hispanic or Latino population. Although we don't have the most current data, according to the trends of the increasing immigrants and refugee population in King County, we can assume that in 2005 the number of Hispanics or Latinos will have exceeded 2,500. This number does not yet include those individuals who are undocumented. In addition to race and ethnicity, other demographic characteristics of residents of Tukwila are worth noting. For example, the total occupied housing units in 2000 was 7,186. Among them, 3,045 were owner - occupied housing units and 4,141 renter - occupied housing units. More than 1 /2 of housing units in Tukwila is rental housing. The average household size was 2.38 and average family size 3.09. The population of children age three years and over enrolled in school was 4,147, including 297 preschoolers, 209 kindergarteners, 1,834 elementary school students (grade 1 -8), 882 high school students (grade 9 -12), and 925 college or graduate school students. Thirty-two percent (32 %) of Tukwila residents (15,955) spoke a language other than English at home compared with 68% (10,850) who were English- speaking only families. Next to English, Spanish was the second most frequently spoken language in Tukwila. The General Demographic Characteristics of the Pilot Participants: Below is the data that we collected from the 49 family recruitment forms that were filled out by the informal community leaders and the Spanish- speaking project coordinator. *One female participant was originally from Czechoslovakia and married to a Mexican. We considered her family a Mexican family. 8 Country of Origin Country of Origin Total Pilot Families Mexico. Peru 49 *47 2 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population 17,181 100% Hispanic or Latino (or any race) 2,329 13.6% Mexican 1,829 10.6% Puerto Rican 29 0.2% Cuban 17 0.1% Other Hispanic or Latino 454 2.6% Not Hispanic or Latino 14,852 86.4% White alone 9,297 54.1% In the year of 2000, there were 2,329 Hispanics or Latinos living in the City of Tukwila. Among them, the 1,829 Mexican residents represented 79% of its total Hispanic or Latino population. Although we don't have the most current data, according to the trends of the increasing immigrants and refugee population in King County, we can assume that in 2005 the number of Hispanics or Latinos will have exceeded 2,500. This number does not yet include those individuals who are undocumented. In addition to race and ethnicity, other demographic characteristics of residents of Tukwila are worth noting. For example, the total occupied housing units in 2000 was 7,186. Among them, 3,045 were owner - occupied housing units and 4,141 renter - occupied housing units. More than 1 /2 of housing units in Tukwila is rental housing. The average household size was 2.38 and average family size 3.09. The population of children age three years and over enrolled in school was 4,147, including 297 preschoolers, 209 kindergarteners, 1,834 elementary school students (grade 1 -8), 882 high school students (grade 9 -12), and 925 college or graduate school students. Thirty-two percent (32 %) of Tukwila residents (15,955) spoke a language other than English at home compared with 68% (10,850) who were English- speaking only families. Next to English, Spanish was the second most frequently spoken language in Tukwila. The General Demographic Characteristics of the Pilot Participants: Below is the data that we collected from the 49 family recruitment forms that were filled out by the informal community leaders and the Spanish- speaking project coordinator. *One female participant was originally from Czechoslovakia and married to a Mexican. We considered her family a Mexican family. 8 Language Proficiency of Pilot participants Written English Spoken English Written Spanish Spoken Spanish Number of the families 6 12 * 46 49 Number of Children in Each Family 1 Child — 5 families 2 Children — 23 families 3 Children — 15 families 4 Children — 4 families Number of the families 5 Children — 2 families 8 Adults — 1 family 9 Adults — 1 family Unknown — 12 families Adults Living in the Same Household 1 Adult — 1 family 2 Adults -- 22 families 3 Adults — 5 families 4 Adults — 6 families Number of the families 5 Adults — 1 family 8 Adults — 1 family 9 Adults — 1 family Unknown — 12 families Years living in the USA 0 -4 Years 5 -9 Years 10 -15 Years 16 -20 Years Number of the families 17 20 11 1 Parent Asthma Special Needs Developmental Vision Reports of without Delays in Impairment Total Number of Children Additional Specified Speech, Learning, Indicated Live at Apt Address Indicated Live at House Address No Address 31 17 1 Total Participants Male Female *57 7 50 • • • *This number represents forty -nine families who filled out the family recruitment forms. Within these families, six families participated in the interviews as husbands and wives, one family as a same -sex couple, and one family as a mother and a daughter. *Of these 12, 4 indicated limited English speaking ability. 9 with Special Needs Diagnosis /or Comments Reading, and Understanding *18 8 4 4 2 *We suspected the number was actually under - stated because our interviewer observed two additional children with possible developmental delays during the individual interviews. The families did not list their children in the "children with special needs" category. In addition, during the focus groups, we also observed a child who appeared to have autism and a child who appeared to have Cerebral Palsy at our on -site child care. The child care provider also believed that these 2 children did have special needs. Comparing the demographics of the population in City of Tukwila with our pilot research samples, the study subjects certainly reflect the Hispanic or Latino population in Tukwila. The diversity within the Hispanic or Latino population is well represented by the forty -nine families who participated in the pilot. Therefore, we are confident that the feedback from these families should represent many other Hispanic or Latino families' opinions as well. Methodology The process of designing and conducting the pilot was guided by Family Centered Principles adopted from Infusing Cultural Competence in Early Childhood Programs, a Multicultural Early Childhood Team Training Curriculum, developed by George Mason University's Helen A. Keller Institute for Human disabilities and the Parent Educational Advocacy Training Center in Virginia. Principles include: • The family is the child's first and best advocate. • Families decide what services they need. • Effective programs make families feel welcome and are shaped by families. • A child with disabilities, like any child, is a member of a family within a community. • A family's perspectives and values are shaped by life experiences, including their ethnic, racial, and cultural backgrounds. • Families can better meet their children's special needs when they feel supported. • Family /professional mutuality promotes the respect and understanding needed for both families and professionals to be successful and supported. The South FACES Child Development Pilot consists of three key elements: A. The core team: Members of the core team include A.C.E. staff, informal community leaders and South FACES group members. • • Staff from A.C.E. includes David Woodward, the President and C.E.O., who oversaw the pilot and was responsible for the contract, and two project coordinators, Ginger Kwan and Mercedes Cordova - Hakim, who were in charge of designing and executing the pilot. Ginger's role was to coordinate, recruit informal community leaders, monitor the project timeline, communicate with South FACES members, and produce the final report. Ginger is experienced in working with groups at meetings and participating in conim ttees, and task forces. She also has extensive direct experience with families from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. Mercedes' role was to facilitate the focus groups, conduct individual interviews, translate interview scripts, and recruit community leaders. She has worked in Tukwila for several years with Latino families who have young children in early childhood education programs. With a strong background in bilingual education and early childhood education, and a long networking history in diverse communities, especially in the Latino community, Mercedes is the key to the success of the project. Together, Ginger and Mercedes designed the process and conducted the pilot, including developing project flyers, family screening tool, consent forms, and interview questionnaire; conducting recruitment of informal community leaders; hiring a translator and transcriber; preparing Spanish resource /information packages; arranging child care, food, gift certificates for the focus groups; and conducting individual interviews. Ginger reported the progress of the pilot to South FACES at their monthly meetings. The group members then provided feedback and guidance to ensure the pilot was consistent with its purposes. The communications between pilot staff and South FACES was open and reciprocal. It has increased the effectiveness of the pilot. B. Informal Community Leaders and Recruitment of Participants: Another element that contributed to the success of the pilot was using the informal community leaders to provide outreach to Latino families in Tukwila. This model of using the informal community leaders was required by The South FACES in its original RFP process. The pilot project staff also agreed that the informal community leaders would be the key link to the Latino families. The results also proved that this is an effective and successful method to recruit families. Soon after the five informal community leaders were identified and recruited through Mercedes' network and South FACES members' recommendations, forty -nine Latino families were recruited without problems. The "informal community leaders" defined in this report are people who know Latino families living in Tukwila and are familiar with the Latino community. All of • them are Latinos and four out of five are bilingual in Spanish and English. The project coordinators recruited and paid them to screen and recruit Latino families 11 who have young children age 0 -6 years old, and to attend one of the focus groups. The project coordinators met with all the informal community leaders prior to the recruitment of families. We reviewed the purpose of the pilot, job description and scope of work with each of them. All signed the agreement and were thrilled to learn about the pilot. At the beginning of the project, we only identified 4 informal community leaders. Another parent was recruited during an early individual interview. This parent was a participant who requested to be interviewed individually. During the interview, Mercedes discovered her quality and ability to be an informal community leader. Because of her connection with many other Latino families in Tukwila, we recruited this parent to be another informal community leader to the pilot. Unlike other informal community leaders, who are bilingual and hold other paid jobs, this stay -at -home mother, who only speaks Spanish, turned out to be the most effective informal community leader to the project. She is well connected to other parents who have young children like hers and can relate to many Latino parents who speak only Spanish. She helped to recruit child care providers and food services providers, and oriented and welcomed parents at the focus groups. She seemed to be well liked and trusted by the participating parents. In addition, because she did not have another job obligation, she was more flexible with the time when we needed her. A couple of the informal community leaders were not able to participate in focus groups due to their job obligations. As a result, some of the parents they recruited did not come to the focus groups. On the contrary, those 'informal community leaders who attended the focus groups were able to remind their parents to come and assure them that they would be present. The personal connections between the informal community leaders and Latino parents make it possible for the project to recruit these families. C. Focus Group and Individual Interviews The original pilot design was to conduct focus groups only. The pilot coordinator modified the project to provide one more option to the families. Families could choose to be interviewed individually or in a focus group setting with on -site child care and a meal provided. Among the forty-nine families, twenty -three chose to be interviewed individually and twenty -six chose to participate in a group setting. Three Focus Group Interviews: For the focus group interviews, parents decided the date, time, and the meeting place. The majority preferred a specific Sunday at an elementary school. Therefore, we conducted two focus groups at an elementary school in Tukwila, obtained through the help from a South FACES group member. At these two focus groups, we provided on -site child care with Spanish - speaking child care providers, Mexican food, pizza and snacks for children. Each focus group, one held in the morning and one in the afternoon, lasted approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes. A total of eight families attended the morning session from 10 -12:00 pm and eleven families in the afternoon from 1:00 — 3:00 pm. 12 o • • • • The group interview began with a welcome and introduction to the South FACES Child Development Pilot, project staff and informal community leaders. Families were informed that the conversation would be taped but their names would be kept confidential. We assured them that we would not use their names in any reports. Parents were given the agreement of understanding on their rights to participate or to withdrawal from the interview. Mercedes asked them to sign the agreement of participation should they agree to participate. All signed the consents and photographic release for us to take their and their children's pictures. After the interview, each family was given a $30 gift certificates for a store of their choosing: Safeway, Albertson, WalMart, Fred Meyer, and Target. We also provided extensive information and resources in Spanish for them to take home. Each family received an information and resource package containing the following Spanish language materials: Tukwila Community Resources Guide, Child Care Resources brochure, Babies Can't Wait brochure, Children with Special Needs, ASK pamphlet, Getting School Ready parents guide, Autos Buying and Leasing CARS, One Hundred Ways Parents can Participate in Their Children's Education, etc. Parents were amazed by the wealth of information available in Spanish. Many of them showed appreciation for what they received and commented that they needed more information, but did not know where to get it. The third group interview took place at a participant's home. The interview procedure was the same as the other group interviews. All rights were explained and all families signed the consents. Some light snacks and drink were provided during the meeting. Compared with the previous two groups, this group was more vocal and assertive in sharing their concerns and frustrations with Mercedes. We suspected that having a meeting at a home setting might have given parents the courage and comfort to speak out and express themselves easily. The total of seven participants also received gift certificates and information packages. Individual Family Interviews: Parents who chose to be interviewed individually also went through the same process of introduction, signing of consents, etc. as were participants in the focus groups. Mercedes met with parents at the time and places they preferred. The individual interviews were also taped to ensure their inputs were thoroughly recorded. Similar to conducting the focus groups, Mercedes had to explain the questions in the ways that parents would understand, so they were able to provide feedback. 13 Some minor challenges happened during the home visits. For example, parents did not answer door or were not able to give clear directions on how to get to their places. It resulted in having to recruit additional parents for replacement. Overall, the focus groups and individual interviews were successful because of Mercedes' persistence and determination. She recruited additional families through her network in the Tukwila community as others did not follow through. As a result of her extraordinary work, we successfully interviewed forty -nine Latino families (fifty -seven people). The methodology we used for conducting the South FACES Child Development Pilot can serve as a model for other interested parties for conducting needs assessments in other ethnic communities. For this purpose, all of the tools we developed are attached at the end of the report. Key Findings The survey questions focus on three domains: child development, school, and community. All the parents' feedback is organized by focus groups and individual interviews in each domain. In order not to repeat the same responses by parents in both focus groups and individual interviews, some major key findings that were not listed under the focus groups section will be covered under the individual interviews section. A. Child Development In this domain, we explored Latino families' child raring practices, their beliefs and cultural values on child development. Focus Groups: 1. When asked to talk about their experiences and activities that they think will help their children (age 0 -6) learning and developing, the majority of parents indicated that home is the first and foremost important learning environment for young children. Parents are the role models to their children. One parent said, "Education and good manners begin at home, children learn from all the family members including parents, siblings, grandparents, ants, uncles, and cousins." From the families' comments, we learned that families believe that by reading to them, playing with them, taking care of them, modeling to them, and loving them, parents can help their young children learn and grow better. Specific activities that families pointed out that they would do to help their children grow were coloring, drawing, reading, singing, doing puzzles, and exercising. There were a few common shared values among all the families. Teaching children to respect others and surrounding environment, being responsible, having good behavior and manners, and understanding what's wrong or right were important to young children's learning. In addition, teaching children how to negotiate was also an important leaning experience for young children. Parents believe that negotiation is an essential surviving skill. 14 • • Although many parents were able to point out what they should do and could do to help their child's learning and development, a few shared great concerns about their abilities to teach children and help them be successful at school. These parents felt inadequate and incompetent to teach their children. They commented that they did not have enough education or much experience in raising young children. They felt that they needed parenting education in order to help their children learn and grow. Overall, families believe strongly that home is the base of all learning for young children. They learn from watching what their family members do. If adults teach children with a positive attitude, they will grow up to have confidence in themselves and have high self- esteem. One important role of parents to help their young children learn and grow is by being a loving and caring parent, attending to children's needs, and ensuring that they grow in a loving home environment. 2. When asked about how they would know if their child is developing normally according to his /her age, families had fewer comments. Only a few parents provided feedback. These parents said that indications that a child is not developing normally are: if the child is not active, is sad, shy, rebellious, does not ask questions, does not show affection to parents, gets mad easily, behaves . differently, and quits more often than usual. Most parents who responded to this question would compare their child's behaviors with his /her siblings' or neighborhood children's to determine if the child is developing typically. No parents said that they would access any written materials, such as books, to learn more about child development. 3. Where would you go and with whom do you talk about your child's developmental needs and /or worries? Among the twenty -six families that participated in the focus groups, six of them said that they would go to the emergency room to seek help. Their reasons were that the emergency rooms are open 24 hours /day, 7 days /week and they can't afford to lose one day's work to see doctors during regular work hours. In addition, very often, they can find someone who speaks Spanish at the emergency room. Moreover, they do not know who might be able to help their children in other places. Therefore, going to the emergency room becomes one of the solutions. Other parents said that they turn first to families, friends, and neighbors for help, second to the schools and teachers, third to doctors, and finally they may go see other professionals like psychologists or nutritionists for consultation. 4, If parents had children with special needs, there would be many things they would want to know first. Their questions would be: • What is the diagnosis of the child's problems? • Where can they get financial help to pay for hospital treatment? 15 • What is the proper intervention and treatment for their children? • Where should they turn to for help? • How should they take care of their children with special needs? • Is there any organization that can help them? • What help and support is available in their community? • Who can help them in their language? • Can any social worker provide information about their children's needs and assist them access services? Parents shared many concerns about having a child with special needs. Among the many concerns they had, legal status was their number one concern. They worried that the hospital would not treat their children because of their legal status. Another common fear parents had was not having enough money to provide necessary health care to their children with special needs. In addition, it was difficult when they didn't know where and how to access accurate information in Spanish to help their children. A couple of parents who didn't have children with special needs commented: "sometimes parents of children with special needs prefer to act as if there's nothing wrong with their children." This comment might be an indication of how cultural perceptions about disabilities create barriers for diverse families to seek help. This could result in many children with special needs receiving a delayed diagnosis and not getting access to early intervention services nor enough family support. Home Visits Parents who participated in the individual interviews shared similar thoughts on raising young children, getting them ready for school, as parents who attended the focus groups. Below is feedback from them that is not mentioned by the focus group parents. 1. Parents stated that they could help their children learn by limiting the TV time, asking them questions about what they learn at school and teaching them the cultural difference between school and Latino culture. For instance, at home children are taught not to look adults in the eye, a form of showing respect. However, when children go to school, teachers expect them to look into their eyes to answer questions, a form of showing respect. Subtle cultural differences like this can sometimes create the misunderstanding of behavioral issues for educators who might not be aware of the cultural perspectives. 2. Regarding the understanding of the child's development, seventeen out of the twenty -three parents shared similar views as parents interviewed in focus group. They also focused on their child's behavior. 16 • • • 3. When it comes to seeking guidance and help for concerns about child development, their answers are similar to the ones provided by parent in focus groups. 4. For questions relating to raising children with special needs, the majority of parents shared concerns in areas of health care, resources, financial needs, legal status, and most of all, the language barriers. Their comments were not much different from group participants'. However, three parents who were interviewed at home setting shared one additional concern. These parents relied on their children to interpret information and messages. They expressed concern that if their child had special needs and was unable to serve this role, they would be unable to communicate with others and to get services for the child. The findings led us to conclude that most Latino families did many specific activities with their young children to help them grow and learn. Their cultural values centered in family environments. All teaching and learning for young children began within family members. Most Latino families also relied on friends' and neighbors' guidance when worrying about their child's development. For families with children with special needs, their barriers and challenges to take care of their children were doubled by cultural perceptions and beliefs about disabilities. No wonder that one parent said, "I dare not to think about having a child with special needs." B. Schools Focus Groups In the second domain, we examined Latino families' perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, communication, and experiences with school. 1. Talk about your experiences with your children's school. Many indicated that because of the language barriers, they encountered many unpleasant experiences. Some believed that their children were not treated equally because of low English proficiency. Parents believed that their children were doing fine academically in their countries of origin, but they are not performing well in school here due to the language barriers. In addition, they see that their children, instead of making progress, remain at the same learning level. Parents are frustrated by their inability to help their kids with homework. Furthermore, neither do they understand what teachers or schools expect them to do. They said, "The teacher doesn't pay attention to parents when we can't communicate in English ", and "Parents feel afraid of asking questions at school because they don't have the language skills." 2. What do schools expect you to do to prepare your child for school? Some specific activities that many parents believe school expects them to do to prepare their children for school are: 17 • Respect for teachers, students, and others. • Recognition of colors and reading. • How to speak up for themselves. • How to communicate with teachers about any problems that might arise. • Help with homework. • Purchase books, school materials before a new semester begins. Parents also take it as their obligation to get their children ready for school. They believe that when they teach their children how to behave in school and prepare the things they need at school, children and teachers are likely to have a good relationship. 3. How do you prepare your child for school? Parents pointed out many things they do to help their children ready for schools. These things include: • reading to them, teaching them colors and numbers, • teaching them to follow instructions, • developing good sleeping habits, • practicing personal hygiene, • having good healthy habits 4. We asked parents to talk about how schools communicate with them and work ith them to ensure their child's success in school. /Generally speaking, the common communication methods between parents and i f schools were teacher - parent conferences, announcements, letters, and phone calls. Nine parents said that these communications were all in English. Unfortunately, most parents participating in the pilot don't speak or read English. Therefore, their communication with schools is very limited. According to parents, teachers weren't able to help or respond to their questions and requests. Some parents believe racism exists in the school system that contributes to the failure of their children at school. 5. What kind of role would you like to have or play at your child's school? Parents seemed to be reluctant to answer this question. They said, "As parents, we want to know if the school needs help, but again we don't know because of the language," and "the language is a barrier to prevent this activity from happening." In spite of feeling helpless, they feel that it is important to get involved with their child's school. They would like to participate in school festivities, volunteer to help with different school needs, copy materials for teachers, help in the classroom, attend field trips, provide snacks, and be teacher's helpers. Sometimes the efforts from Latino parents to help school can be discouraged by other English speaking parents due to their lack of sensitivities or biases toward parents who speak little or no English. One father shared his unpleasant 18 • • • experience on volunteering at school. One time, he went to support a school bake sale fund raising event. During the sale, a Caucasian father spoke to him in English and told him that if he didn't speak English he should go back to his own country. This incident resulted in the Latino father never go back to any of his children's schools. He felt insulted and humiliated by this Caucasian parent. In addition, he feared that he might be deported if this Caucasian parent reported him to the INS. This story represents only one example of the regular racism and discrimination that parents from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds face. Consequently, parents from diverse backgrounds often hesitate to participate in their children's school activities or get involved in the educational system. Parents wish there were translators /interpreters available at schools to assist them with their English language needs. They have great concerns about how to respond when a negative incident happens at school. They would like to be able to ask questions as well as express their concerns. Home Visits 1. Language barrier, again, is the major issue, regarding Latino parents' experience and communication with schools. Moreover, cultural perspectives on school's role and responsibilities can hinder young Latino children's success in education as well. A couple of parents shared comments such as "I do not like the fact that they want me to teach my son letters and things. I think that it is their job," and "I would be happy to help my child when he does not understand something, but I think that the primary responsibility for teaching them is the school's." A total of six parents in the home visits indicated that they have had positive experiences with their children's schools versus seven parents who have had negative experiences. 2. Regarding the question of what schools expect of parents in preparing children for school, similar answers were given by these parents in comparison with the focus group parents. However, .a few bilingual parents shared somewhat different perspectives, mentioning that without the language barrier, they understood what schools wanted them to do to prepare their children ready for schools. In spite of understanding certain expectations that schools have of parents, some parents said that they had difficulty meeting the expectations and standards that schools set for them. A couple of parents commented that schools don't understand that sometimes they have to ask their older child to help a younger child with the homework because of their low English language skill. They wish schools would be more patient with parents and children who don't speak English. 19 3. We asked parents about how and what they do to prepare their children for schools. Six of the twenty -three parents said that they help their children with homework and teach them how to behave at schools. Three parents teach their children how to pronounce English words the right way. In addition, they advise their children about the importance of going to school and talk with them about how many more educational opportunities they have than did their parents. A few parents also teach their children develop good sleeping habits, and to take care of themselves physically. Some parents get children excited about going to school by telling them wonderful things about school before they start attending. 4. The common communication methods used by schools were already mentioned by the focus group parents. The majority of Latino parents shared similar concerns about lack of communication or increased misunderstanding between school and family due to the language barriers. One parent told a story about his first grade son who was accused of threatening another child's life. He went to school and tried to understand the problem. It was very difficult for him to understand exactly what had happened and he explained to school staff about what his son said he had done. It was an ordeal. Finally, the school staff realized that the incident was due to a misunderstanding of what the child meant to say. However, unlike many other parents, five parents who were interviewed individually actually said that things were working out fine. In addition, two bilingual parents also said that the communication was working. Some other parents could understand how their children were doing at school because sometimes there were interpreters available during parent- teacher conference. Some parents commented that schools should take responsibility to make sure that parents get accurate information about things which happen in schools and orient parents about school policies and rules at the beginning of the school year in Spanish. Information about child abuse and neglect needs to be available to parents, again in Spanish. 5. Most of the answers were provided at the focus group regarding parental involvement in schools. To some, the definition of "school involvement" is somewhat vague. Parents wanted to know how they could get involved in their children's education besides going to school and helping teachers make copies or cut paper in person. Parents believed that schools need to find ways to break the language barrier and encourage Latino parents' involvement. In addition to the language, many parents who work full time find it difficult to volunteer at school. To summarize this section, obviously, because of the language barrier, many Latino families who speak little or no English generally do not have positive 20 • • • experiences with schools, and they are frustrated by low or no communication between schools and themselves. They want to help and get involved with their children's education, but fear being discriminated against or humiliated by other parents. Sometimes circumstances do not allow them to volunteer at school. The experience of bilingual Latino parents with school are more positive because the communication channels are open to them. They understand what schools expect them to do to help their children get ready for school. In order to. ensure that Latino children will be successful at school, parents and schools need to work together to increase communication and remove the barriers that prevent parents from actively participating in their children's education. C. Community Focus Groups In this domain, we surveyed that from whom and how Latino families got information and resources, who helped them and what services they needed but were not available to them. 1. What is it like to raise a family in Tukwila? Regarding safety issues, most families feel Tukwila is a safe community in which to raise children. Many indicated that they have a neighborhood watch program. Parks and community centers are great places to hang out with other families. Some said that their neighborhoods are safe for children to play outside. However, families feel desperate without language assistance in the surrounding Tukwila community. They feel frustrated because there is little information about this community in Spanish. 2 and 3. Where do you usually go to get information, resources and help? Why do you go there? The places mentioned by parents include: • Family, friends, and neighbors • Spanish radio AM channels 1540 and 1360, and Spanish newspapers and TV • Library, schools, community centers, and churches • City Festivities • Post office, police station, and fire department • Welfare office, WIC • Hospital (Highline Community Hospital in Burien) • Sea -mar (located in SeaTac) • Centro de la Raza (located at Beacon Hill) Parents go to a specific place depending on the types of problems they have. The places parents mentioned frequently are family, friends, and neighbors, library, and schools. They would go there to get information because the information is prepared in Spanish for them. 21 4. How do you learn about resources in the community? Parents very much repeated answers to the previous questions two and three. 5. What's the best way for someone /or an organization to get information to you? The majority of parents would like to talk to someone who speaks Spanish or receive information in written Spanish. 6. What kind of services and information resources you would like to have available for you and your family in the Tukwila community? The parents' wish list ranked from top to bottom were: • Spanish information centers and Spanish organization • "No discrimination" • More children's programs and activities • Information about the rights of undocumented immigrants and their famiiies • Spanish language assistance in the hospitals and clinics • Information on drugs and alcohol abuse, domestic violence, and teen pregnancy prevention • More Spanish books and materials in libraries • Swimming pool (with a flexible schedule and with information in Spanish) • More job opportunities, employment and vocational training in Spanish • Free computer classes and ESL programs in Spanish for adults • Medical insurance for adults and children regardless of their immigrant status • Medical coupon for adults and children regardless of their legal status • More police patrol in the community • Classes or activities that involved all the members of a family • Affordable rent • Childcare • Bilingual teachers • Educational resources • American school systems orientation and American cultural orientation • Information about CPR, emergency situation, and First Aid Kit Home Visits 1. A few parents interviewed individually considered that their neighborhoods were unsafe. Those neighborhoods they lived in did not have neighbor watch programs. Like most parents interviewed in focus groups, home interviewed parents also shared some positive experiences of raising a family with young children in Tukwila. One of the great experiences they had was attending the Even Start program. Among all the services that Latino parents received in Tukwila, the Even Start program was highly praised. To Latino parents, Even Start program 22 • • makes them feel safe and welcome. Nine out of twenty -three parents said that the Even Start program taught them English, provided childcare, and had activities for the entire family. In addition, the program provided them with useful information and a lot of good things. "Who would pass on this great opportunity ?" commented a parent. 2 & 3. The reason why parents go to a particular center or program is because it has more information and resources in Spanish than others. For example, Sea Mar serves them in Spanish. Moreover, some activities, for instance community fairs and school family nights, attract Latino parents because they provide free meals at the event. To some, it is important that a meal is provided. 4 &5. Many parents prefer receiving information from family, friends, and neighbors through verbal communication. One interesting place that parents would go to get information is community parks. They said, I talk to people there and get information that I need. For those who speak little or no English, networking at parks becomes some parents' effective way of getting resources and information. Besides, receiving newsletters, community flyers, brochures, announcements, etc. in Spanish works for Latino families as well. For bilingual parents, e-mail is another way to reach them. 6. in addition to the ones listed under the group findings, the parents being • interviewed individually add some more things on their wish list. They wish to have services or programs available to them in Tukwila, like: • Spanish interpreters and translators to assist them accessing needed services in our community • Food banks • Art classes and after school programs for children Overall, we identified the patterns of how Latino families received information, got resources, and what services they wish were available in Tukwila. It is clear that most of them are disconnected with services they need because of the language barriers. Latino families would need to go outside of Tukwila to receive healthcare, information, and support from organizations that provide assistance in Spanish. Lessons /Barriers Learned We have learned many lessons and identified most barriers that Latino families experience relating to early childhood school readiness, relationship and communication with school, and experiences of raising a family in Tukwila. Lesson learned through the process of conducting the pilot: 1. The effective way of outreaching to the linguistically and culturally diverse community is using informal community leaders. Families were all recruited by direct contact either by phone or in person, not through a 23 recruitment flyer that was a commonly used method for recruitment in the dominant culture. 2. One of our informal community leaders who turned out to be the most helpful one was a stay -at -home mother who knew the Latino community in Tukwila well. She was able to recruit not only parents to participate in the project, but also childcare providers to take care of children during the focus group meetings. 3. Providing gift certificates, meals, childcare, and resources in Spanish encouraged family participation. With a small amount of incentive provided, informal community leaders found it easier to recruit families. The informal community leaders commented that many Latino families who live in poverty appreciated the gift certificate very much. In fact, once the word was out, additional families wanted to participate in the interviews. 4. The original pilot proposed by the South FACES was to conduct only focus groups. However, the pilot project coordinator decided to provide one more option for families to choose from; either being interviewed individually or in a focus group. When we offered an option to families, it resulted in twenty -three families choosing to be interviewed individually at a comfortable and convenient location to them. 5. Parents felt that we truly valued and respected them because the pilot was designed and conducted in Family Centered principles. They appreciated the way we conducted the interviews and the information resource packages provided. 6. Among the three focus groups, the parents who participated in the home setting were more vocal and willing to share their frustration about racial discrimination compared with the other two groups and individuals. We don't know exactly why. However, we suspected that the environment at home and as a group might give these parents courage to express their frustration honestly. 7. Avoid any jargon and unfamiliar terms. Use family friendly language when conducting the interviews. in order for families to understand our questions, so they could respond, Mercedes provided a lot of explanation and clarification about the questions. 8. Be careful about translation. Be precise about questions and make sure the translation is clear and exact. For example: when we asked parents about concerns relating to their child's development, "development" in Spanish is "desarollo" which can be interpreted as emotional development, physical development, or intellectual development. As a 24 • result, parents might give dramatically different answers depending upon which meaning they responded to. • • 9. As in other communities, socio- economic status in the Latino community also divides people as to who gets what and how. Families who are economically well off face less challenges than those who live in poverty. From our observations during the group interviews, we saw that parents with similar social economic status grouped themselves and sat together. Barriers identified: 1. Language is the biggest barrier that prevents Latino families from seeking help for their children's developmental needs, communicating with schools, and accessing information and resources in the community. 2. Many Latino families feel being discriminated against due to their legal status, and linguistic and cultural heritage. One of the results is Latino parents' disengagement from involving in their children's education. Trust and communication is minimal and limited between schools and the families. 3. Some Latino parents feel frustrated and incompetent about getting their children ready for school or helping their children to be successful at school due to their minimal schooling or education. 4. Parents of children with special needs faced an extra challenge and financial burden. Cultural perceptions on disabilities might have prevented parents from seeking support and help for their children with special needs. Dealing with health care issue, special education, interventions and treatments becomes a humongous task for families. Families often feel overwhelmed and helpless. 5. Latino families, especially the newly arrived or undocumented immigrants, have little understanding of how the dominant culture is functioning. Different cultural experiences and perspectives create miscommunication and mistrust between families and service providers. There is a great need to provide cultural competence training for both parties in order to increase the mutual cultural understanding. 6. There is limited service in Spanish or language support for Latino families in Tukwila. Families have difficulty finding the resources they need. Recommended Actions From our findings, we recommend the South FACES groups take the following actions to expand the pilot and respond to the needs of Latino families who live in Tukwila community. 25 Child Development: • Develop and provide support family, friends, and neighbor network activities for Latino families to receive early - childhood related materials and information in Spanish. • Provide parent education opportunities in Spanish related to early childhood development and school readiness. • Outreach to parents of children with special needs and create inclusive family support programs to meet their needs in the existing organizations in their community. Due to the limitation of the amount of work we were able to do through this pilot, we weren't able to interview educators in Tukwila school districts. Therefore, we would recommend the South FACES group share the pilot findings with Tukwila School District and collaborate with them to strategize the implementation on the following actions. School: • Hire a Spanish speaking Family liaison to translate school materials and to operate a Spanish information phone line. • Hire more bilingual Latino teachers. • Recruit bilingual Latino parents to share information with other Latino families. • Partner with Spanish - speaking parents to create a problem - solving think tank to address their needs. • Provide cultural competency training to school administrators, teachers, and other staff to learn how to work and communicate with families from diverse linguistic, ethnic, and cultural backgrounds. We recommend South FACES groups share the pilot findings with other interested parties in South King County and to work collaboratively implementing the recommended action. Community • Establish a Spanish information, resources, and language assistance center to provide desired services and meet Latino families' needs. • Provide more after- school programs for Latino children and their families. The overall recommended actions to address issues relating to Latino families and other ethnic minority groups in Tukwila and in other regions in King County are to: • Use this pilot as a model and modity it to meet other ethnic community's needs and conduct the needs assessment. • Present the findings and recommended actions to other FACES groups and seek for funding to implement the recommended actions. 26 • • • Acknowledgement We would like to thank United Way of King County for the funding that made the South FACES Child Development Pilot possible, and the following dedicated members who contributed their time, energy, expertise and commitment to support the pilot. And last, but not least, we thank all the Latino families who have young children 0 -6 participated in the focus groups and individual interviews for their time and willingness to be a part of this pilot. Without their participation, this pilot would not have been possible. South FACES core group members: Denese Bohanna, South King County Network Cathy Garland, Children's Home Society of Washington Lori Guilfoyle, United Way of King County Deanna Houck, Public Health Seattle -King County Loren Inman, Federal Way Youth and Family Services Marty Jacobs, Child Care Resources Jim Ott, King County Children and Family Commission Mark Sabol, Even Start Program/Tukwila School District Laura Silverstein, New Futures Marny Smith, Renton Area Youth and Family Services Project staff: David Woodward, President and CEO, Associates in Cultural Exchange Ginger Kwan, Co- project Coordinator, Associates in Cultural Exchange Mercedes Codova- Hakim, Co- project Coordinator, Associates in Cultural Exchange Angeles Dunbar, Informal Community Leader Virginia Herrer, Informal Community Leader Oliva Murillo, Informal Community Leader Amaranta Sandys, Informal Community Leader Maria Zarate, Informal Community Leader Maru Villalpundo, Transcriber/Translator 27 ATTACHMENT A: Community Liaison Recruitment Announcement Mercedes Cordova -Hakim and I, South FACES Child Development Pilot Project coordinators, are recruiting 5 informal community liaisons who are able to recruit Spanish Speaking families living in Tukwila area to participate in a research project. We will pay $240.00 for each community liaison to perform the following tasks: 1. Attend one orientation meeting in Dec. No longer than 2 hours. 2. Contact and recruit 10 Spanish Speaking parents live in City of Tukwila to participate in the South FACES Child Development Pilot project either by attending a focus group or being interviewed individually. 3. Fill out one page parent information sheet for each participating parent. 4. Contact parents and ensure their attendances at the interviews. 3. Co- facilitate one parent focus group meeting with Mercedes for 2 to 2 -1/2 hours. All the above work can be done after the regular work hours. We are planning to conduct the focus groups and individual interviews in February and March 2005 during the weekends or after the regular work hours depending upon families' availabilities. Refreshment will also be provided during the focus groups. To acknowledge parents' participation, we are providing $30 gift certificate for each participating parent. In addition, on site child care will be available upon parents' request. If you are aware of any potential candidates for this community liaison position, please contact Ginger Kwan at (206) 372 -1072 or e -mail at kwkwan @msn.com. Thank you for your support to the South FACES Child Development Pilot Project. Ginger Kwan (206) 372 -1072 28 • ATTACHMENT B: South FACES Child Development Pilot Agreement Between Informal Community Leaders And Associates in Cultural Exchange (A.C.E.) • • Work Scope: 1. Recruit 10 Spanish speaking parents /caregivers of young children living within the City of Tukwila to participate the South FACES Child Development Pilot interviews either individually or in a group setting. 2. Attend a 2 -hour mandatory contractor orientation in Dec 2004. 3. Follow the family recruitment procedure to recruit parents /caregivers. 4. During the contract period, provide inputs and feedbacks to Mercedes and Ginger to identify concerns, solve problems, and to ensure a successful process for parent interviews. 5. Work with Mercedes and Ginger to contact parents and ensure their full participation and attendance at the interviews. 6. Attend and co- facilitate one 2 -hour parent focus group interview with Mercedes Cordova- Hakim. Work Timeline: 1. By January 31, 2005, complete recruiting ten families and turn in all family recruitment forms to either Mercedes or Ginger by FAX, e -mail, regular mail, or in person. 2. Attend parent group interview between Feb — Mar, 2005. Payment Term: 1. Contractor will receive one time payment at the total amount of $240.00 upon the completion of the work on or before March 31, 2005. 2. For incomplete work, prorated payment might be made depends on the number of families recruited. 3. Either A.C.E. or the Contractor may resolve to discontinue this agreement with two weeks written notice. No payment will be made to the Contractor without the advanced written notice to Ginger Kwan, Project Coordinator. Both parties have reviewed and mutually accepted this Agreement. In witness thereof, A.C.E. and the Contractor have signed this Agreement. Associates in Cultural Exchange Contractor Ginger Kwan Oliva Murillo Project Coordinator Informal Community Leader Date Date 29 ATTACHMENT C: CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON South FACES Child Development Pilot USTED ESTA CORDIALMENTE INVITADO! Anteriormente usted se registro con para participar en una encuesta que el grupo de South FACES Child Development Pilot esta conduciendo en su communidad. South FACES esta interesado en escuchar su opinions y experiencias como padre /madre o cuidador de ninos creciendo en la comunidad de Tukwila. Uste escogio participar en esta encuesta por medio de una junta de grupo, la cual se Ilevara a cabo: Dia: Domingo, 20 de Marzo Elora: ❑ 10a.m. -12.m. (comida de 12- 30p.m.) ❑ 1 - 3p.m. (comida de 12:30 -1 p.m.) Lugar: Thorndyke Elementary School Tendremos cuidado de ninos y comidad antes o despues de la junta Por favor trate de llegar 15 minutos antes de la Nora acordada; para que asi se de tiempo de registrarse y/o llevar a su /s nino /s al salon de cuidad infantil. Si usted tiene alguna pregunta o decea obtener informacion adicional sobre esta junta por favor Ilame a , al ( ) 0, a Mercedes Cordova -Hakim al (206) 321 -7862. ;LO ESPERAMOS! 30 • ATTACHMENT D: ANNOUNCEMENT The South FACES Child Development Pilot Project is inviting Spanish speaking parents and caregivers to young Spanish speaking children live in City of Tukwila to participate in a focus group or an individual interview. • The South FACES is a consortium of early childhood educators, providers, agencies, funders, and advocates who meet monthly to coordinate efforts to support early childhood learning, school readiness, and family support. We are interested to learn about your opinions and experiences as parents and caregivers raising young children in Tukwila community. • Each participant will receive a $30 gift certificate to participate in a focus group or individual interview. In addition, food and child care will be provided at the focus groups. The interview will take 2 hours approximately. We will work around your schedule and choose a place that is convenient to you to conduct the interview. If interested, or for more information, please contact: Mercedes Cordova -Hakim at (206) 321 -7862 (Spanish) Or Ginger Kwan at (206) 372 -1072 (English) E -mail: kwkwanmsn.com 31 ATTACHMENT E: Family Recruitment Form Name of the Recruiter: Date: Parent /Guardian/Caregiver: [ Male [1 Female First Name: Last Name: Contact Number: (phone) (cell) Contact Address: Country of origin: Length of staying in this country: Language proficiency: (mark all that apply) Spoken language: [1 Spanish [1 English Others: Written language: ri Spanish [ 1 English Others: Number of adults live in this same household: (please list) (please list) Children live in the same household and (or will) attend Tukwila schools: 1. Age: Name of school: Special need child YES NO 2. Age: Name of school: Special need child YES NO 3. Age: Name of school: Special need child YES NO Interview preference: 11 individual interview or ❑ Group interview Preferred interview location: r1 Horne Li School ❑ Library ❑ Church [1 Community Center Ll Others: (please list) Best time to meet: [ 1 Mon - Friday 6 -- 8:00 PM I.1 Sat Morning 10 -12:00 PM L} Saturday Afternoon 2 -4:00 PM (Please Note: we will try to schedule the time that most parents preferred, but it might not be exactly what each parent wants) Childcare needs: (during the focus group interview only) Li NO I 1 YES # of children and their ages Please list if any child needs special care: Type of gift certificate preferred: (check one choice only) I1 Target ❑ Wal -Mart [l Safeway Li Fred Meyer 1_1 Albertson 32 • • ATTACHMENT F: Consent Letter for Parent /Caregiver participating in Focus Group and Individual Interviews for the South FACES Child Development Pilot Project Principal Investigator: David Woodward, Associates in Cultural Exchange (206) 217- 9644 Project Co- coordinator: Ginger Kwan, Associates in Cultural Exchange (206) 372 -1072 Project C0- coordinator: Mercedes Cordova -Hakim (206) 321 -7862 The purpose of this consent form is to give you the information you will need to help you decide whether to be interviewed or not. We will go through the purpose and benefits of the project, things we would ask you to do, your rights as a volunteer and explain anything else about the study which is not clear. When we have answered all your questions, you can decide if you want to participate in the interview. This process is called "informed consent." Purpose and Benefits This South FACES Child Development Pilot Project is conducted through the Associates in Cultural Exchange (A.C.E.), which is a locally funded project by Children's Home • Society through a grant of the United Way of King County. We are interviewing Spanish- Speaking parents /caregivers residing in Tukwila to understand their experiences of raising young children in Tukwila. Through the study, we hope to identify effective ways to better serve families, to increase caregivers' and early childhood providers' knowledge about Latino cultures, and to build neighborhood connections and strengthen informal supports. Procedures If you choose to take part in this survey, we would ask you questions relating to child development, school, and community. For individual interviews, it will take 30 -40 minutes and group interviews, 2 hours. Childcare and food are provided for the group interviews. At the end of the interview, you will receive a $30 gift certificate and an information/resource package. Other Information Participation in this study is voluntary. For the purpose of recoding accurate information, all interviews will be audio taped. Your participation in the pilot project and the information about you is strictly confidential. We will not use your name in any report and published material. Mercedes Cordova -Hakim Name of Interviewer (print) Signature of Interviewer Date 33 Subject's Statement: The study has been explained to me. 1 volunteer to take part in this interview. I have had a chance to ask questions. If I have questions later about the project, I can ask the interviewer listed above. If I have questions about my rights as a research subject, I can call Associates in Cultural Exchange, Ginger Kwan at (206) 372 -1072. I will receive a copy of this consent form. Parent /legal guardian name (print) Copies to: Parent Interviewer's file Signature of parent /legal guardian Date 34 • • • ATTACHMENT G: South FACES Child Development Pilot Project Individual Parent/Childcare Giver Interviewer's Guide Date: Interviewer: Estimated time 30 -40 minutes Language of interview: (A = Spanish; B = English; C = Both Spanish and English) Thank you for participating in this interview that we're conducting as part of the South FACES Child Development Pilot Project. My name is Mercedes Cordova - Hakim. I will be interviewing you today. From (the name of the Informal Community Leader), you may already know that South FACES is a consortium of early childhood educators, providers, agencies, fenders, and advocates who meet monthly to coordinate efforts to support early childhood learning, school readiness, and family support. We're gathering your opinions and experiences to share with members of South FACES and other interested community parties. As a result, we hope to be able to provide better support to families. We would like to audiotape this interview, so that we collect accurate information. To protect your privacy, information about your family will be kept confidential. We will not use your name in any report or published material. In this interview, I will ask you questions related to three subjects, Child Development, Schools, and Communities. Before we start, do you have any questions or concerns? (Pause for questions and answers) If not, I would like to begin with a few questions relating to your experiences as a parent/childcare giver. Child development: 1. What experiences and activities will benefit children 0 -6 years old in their learning and development? 2. How do you know if your child is developing typically? 3. Where and who do you turn to if you have concerns or questions about your child's development? 4. As a parent of a child with special needs, what are your biggest concerns? (For family with a child with special needs) 35 5. What do you think your biggest concerns might be if you had a child with special needs? (for family without a child with special needs) We are done with our first subject about child development. Now, let's move to the next part: your experiences relating to your child's school. School perception, beliefs, attitudes, and school readiness: 1. Tell me about your experience with your child's school. 2. What do school expect you to prepare your child for school? 3. How do you prepare your child for school? 4. How do you like the way in which school communicates and works with you to ensure your child's success at school? What kind of role or partnership would you like to have with your child's school? So far, we are finished 2/3 of our interview. You are doing a great job answering the questions. The last part of my questions is about community living. The first question is: Community resources and access: 1. What is it like to raise a family in Tukwila'? 2. Where are the places you often go for resources in Tukwila? 3. Why do you go there'? 4. How do you learn about resources in the community'? 5. What's the best way for someone /or an organization to get information to you'? 6. What resources and services would you like to have available to your family in Tukwila community? We are done with all our questions. Thank you very much for your participation. Your time and feedback are valuable to us. To show our appreciation, we have prepared a 530.00 gift certificate and a package of information on child development and a Tukwila Community Resource Guide in Spanish for your family. Thank you! 36 • • ATTACHMENT H: South FACES Child Development Pilot Project Focus Group Facilitator's Guide Estimated time 100 minutes and conducted in Spanish Welcome! Thank you for participating in this group discussion that we're conducting as part of the South FACES Child Development Pilot Project. My name is Mercedes Cordova - Hakim. I will be your facilitator to lead the discussion today. Through our community friends (names of Informal Community Leaders), you may already know that South FACES is a consortium of early childhood educators, providers, agencies, funders, and advocates who meet monthly to coordinate efforts to support early childhood learning school readiness, and family support. We are gathering your opinions and experiences to share with members in South FACES and other interested community parties. As a result, we hope to be able to provide better support to families. During our discussion, at any time, please feel free to jump in and share your ideas and experiences. Because each individual has different experiences, there are no right or wrong answers. We would like to audiotape this interview, so that we collect accurate information. To protect your privacy, information about your family will be kept confidential. We will not use your name in any report or published material. I will ask you questions related to three subjects: Child Development, Schools, and Communities. Before we start, do you have any questions or concerns? (Pause for questions and answers) If not, I would like to begin with a few questions relating to your experiences as parents /childcare givers. Child development: 1. What experiences and activities will benefit children 0 -6 years old in their learning and development? 2. How do you know if your child is developing typically? 3. Where and who do you turn to if you have concerns or questions about your child's development? 4. For those of you with children with special needs, what are your biggest concerns? • 5. For those of you who don't have children with special needs, what do you think your biggest concerns might be if you did? 37 We are done with our first subject about child development. Now, let's move to the next part: your experiences relating to your child's school. School perception, beliefs, attitudes, and school readiness: 1. Tell me about your experience with your child's school. 2. What do school expect you to do to prepare your child for school? 3. How do you prepare your child for school? 4. How do you like the way in which school communicates and works with you to ensure your child's success at school? 5. What kind of role or partnership would you like to have with your child's school? So far, we are finished 2/3 of our interview. You are doing a great job answering the questions. The last part of our questions is about community living. The first question is: Community resources and access: 6. What is it like to raise a family in Tukwila? 7. Where are the places you often go for resources in Tukwila? 8. Why do you go there? 9. How do you learn about resources in the community? 10. What's the best way for someone /or an organization to get information to you? 11. What resources and services would you like to have available to your family in Tukwila community? We are done with all our questions. Thank you very much for your participation. Your time and feedback are valuable to us. To show our appreciation, we have prepared a $30.00 gift certificate and a package of information on child development and a Tukwila Community Resource Guide in Spanish for each of you to take home. Thank you and have a safe trip home! 38 lcnrgs42.p 03.06.01.2- 010099 Totals for Race A: 543 f:\ttC....1r\ TOs for Race B: 656 - J tci.L ./ 1Q A. 15f Y1I C_ Totals for Race H: 615 1.41 5 L p , Totals for Race I: 46 y� e . v1cazy, \c CA ,A 0.5 N« ■1 e_ Totals for Race M: 20 �UV Q � � t` , Cej Totals for Race P: 35 I `u a iv\ / r f c,„L,(tL �sI,t.Vo,r Totals for Race W: 826 t_.C_Jh`t 1 t p \ pcuvAl C Totals for Race X: 1 No pf& 41 A-e4 Race Count:2742 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** End of report * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** a m � • • TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT Ethnic Report.jg Q"\-\ in A e., S cR a Time: 9:50 AM Date: 06/02/06 PAGE: 1 lcnrgs42.p 03.06.01.2- 010094 Totals for Fl Home Lang AFRIKAANS: 6 T�s for Fl Home Lang ALBANIAN: 4 Totals for Fl Home Lang AMHARIC: 25 Totals for Fl Home Lang ARABIC: 2 Totals for Fl Home Lang ARMENIAN: 2 Totals for Fl Home Lang BOSNIAN: 122 Totals for Fl Home Lang BULGARIAN: 12 Totals for Fl Home Lang CAMBODIAN: 55 Totals for Fl Home Lang CHINESE - UNSPECI: 14 Totals for Fl Home Lang CREOLE: 1 Totals for Fl Home Lang DINKA: 6 Totals for Fl Home Lang ENGLISH: 1277 Totals for Fl Home Lang ETHIOPIC: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang FANTE: 4 T• for Fl Home Lang FARSI: 15 Totals for Fl Home Lang FRENCH: 4 Totals for Fl Home Lang FULA: 4 Totals for Fl Home Lang GERMAN: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang HINDI: 10 Totals for Fl Home Lang HMONG: 12 Totals for Fl Home Lang IIOKANO: 4 Totals for Fl Home Lang INDONESIAN: 2 Totals for Fl Home Lang KHMER: 1 Totals for Fl Home Lang KOREAN: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang KRIO: 1 Totals for Fl Home Lang KRU: 1 Totals for Fl Home Lang KURDISH: 2 T for Fl Home Lang LAOTIAN: 27 Totals for Fl Home Lang MALAYALAM: 2 TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT Time: 8:36 AM Languages Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 1 lcnrgs92.p 03.06.01.2- 010094 Totals for Fl Home Lang MARSHALLESE: 1 T 111115 for Fl Home Lang MEIN: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang OROMO: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang PALAU ISLAND: 10 Totals for Fl Home Lang PASHTO: 2 Totals for Fl Home Lang PERSIAN: 5 Totals for Fl Home Lang PHILIPPINE: 14 Totals for Fl Home Lang POLISH: 6 Totals for Fl Home Lang PUNJABI: 20 Totals for Fl Home Lang RUMANIAN: 8 Totals for Fl Home Lang RUSSIAN: 68 Totals for Fl Home Lang SAMOAN: 69 Totals for Fl Home Lang SERBO - CROATIAN: 6 Totals for Fl Home Lang SOMALI: 179 T for Fl Home Lang SPANISH: 529 • Totals for Fl Home Lang TAGALOG: 21 Totals for Fl Home Lang THAI: 5 Totals for Fl Home Lang TIGRINIA: 38 Totals for Fl Home Lang TONGAN: 7 Totals for Fl Home Lang TURKISH: 14 Totals for Fl Home Lang UKRAINIAN: 4 Totals for Fl Home Lang UNK: 3 Totals for Fl Home Lang VIETNAMESE: 106 Fl Home Lang Count:2745 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** End of report * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** • TUKWILA SCHOOL DISTRICT Languages ) ` -1 4( g as g °( S t p.,.r, s\- 3 Time: 8:36 AM Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 2 Total o Percentage of Students who report that the Home P Percent P Percent B Percent P Percent Percent Other P Percent Other P Percent Other Total Students who report that the Home Language is Spanish Bosnian Vietmamese Total other than Home Somali Home Home Home Other Prominent Other Prominent Other Prominent Students English Language Language Language Language Language Language Language 2,645 1,361 501 179 ';1'17 98. Samoan (58) Cambodian (51) Russian (49) 405 271 135 36 25 9 Russian (12) Turkish (12) 404 198 78 40 19 20 Samoan (10) Tigrinian (5) 445 226 15 4 34 Samoan (14) Laotian (14) 615 307 12 6 34 23 Samoan (13) Tigrinian (11) 776 359 90 6 35 12 Russian (20) Samoan 16) Districtwid Cascade View Thorndyke Tukwila Showalter Foster Districtwid Cascade View Thorndyke Tukwila Showalter Foster •...••••••• 1616. Ir4111y411.11y16, ..1611. 161111.11 Half of the student population of the district is reported to OSPI as having speaking a language other than English at home. 12 Primary Languages by School.xls Sheetl I_1111y1111.31111 U GI LVVJ VCUP) This figure represents the number of families who have reported to the registrars office what language is most often spoken at home. 51% of the student population of Tukwila school District who reported on the registration forms as coming from homes who's primary language at home is not English. The degree to which this data maybe over reported is unknown. Because parents fill out registration forms, the information students or parents report is not verified by the registrars office. We suspect the data maybe overstated by as much as 10 %. In any event, the number is interesting high. Y•1 \r 0.f • Districtwid Cascade View Thorndyke Tukwila Showalter Foster Districtwid Cascade View Thorndyke Tukwila Showalter Foster •...••••••• 1616. Ir4111y411.11y16, ..1611. 161111.11 Half of the student population of the district is reported to OSPI as having speaking a language other than English at home. 12 Primary Languages by School.xls Sheetl I_1111y1111.31111 U GI LVVJ VCUP) This figure represents the number of families who have reported to the registrars office what language is most often spoken at home. 51% of the student population of Tukwila school District who reported on the registration forms as coming from homes who's primary language at home is not English. The degree to which this data maybe over reported is unknown. Because parents fill out registration forms, the information students or parents report is not verified by the registrars office. We suspect the data maybe overstated by as much as 10 %. In any event, the number is interesting high. Y•1 \r 0.f • latewh25.p 03.06.01.b-010029 • TOTAL E/W STUDENTS: 352 --- -GRADE TOTALS--- - GRAD. YR GRADE MALE FEMALE BOTH 2006 32 20 52 2007 25 16 41 2008 24 22 46 2009 109 104 213 TOTAL: End of report qeigir 190 162 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /L REPORT Ar. Sr.�� ran-•• 6 `-k ri S\ r a \\PN )rv^ 4 „, i) �5 • \ O to Yr C \� C \ V�-�- r'z' S �"�.0 o `�`� V M W h� 110 Z3 c - ON" Y. \s ±:r ■r■ - 5 ce,:Y" -5 15 5c,�o� Qqr 4e.P c- ,,,o.-. O IJ�Y Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 29 letewh25.p 03.06.01. 0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Illi DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTS DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS kNT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ABSHIKOW000 ABSHIR, KOWSAR M. 0095359 448 12 2006 2006 Femal E 04/15/2006 ENT ENTRY FULL TIME RS STUDENT 17406 R 448 448 448 2006 12 N/A 01/01/88 448 448 0 0 0 ALI ABD003 ALI, ABDULLAHI 0. 0095349 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 01/01/87 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ALI AHM001 ALI, AHMED A. 0095427 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 09/30/86 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 1 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ALI BIL000 ALI, BILAN 0101044 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 12/12/86 448 448 E 10/25/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ARGAWMEH000 ARGAW, MEHIRET T. 0095233 448 12 2006 2005 Female Active 05/07/87 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ATKINPHI000 ATKINSON, PHILIP A. 0050647 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 06/21/87 448 448 E 01/04/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A A�LOJOS000 AVALOS, JOSE I. 0095046 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 04/18/87 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A AWALEADA000 AWALE, ADAM A. 0095340 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 01/01/87 448 448 F 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A BELCHTRT000 BELCHER, TRISHA E. 0011729 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 06/09/88 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A CABELNIC000 CABELLO, NICOLE L. 0095047 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 08/16/88 448 448 E 03/03/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A OUAKHSHA000 CHAKHALIDZE, SHAVKAT 0101182 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 05/24/88 448 448 F 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A CHAKHUMT000 CHAKHALOV, UMID 0101063 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 08/18/88 448 448 E 11/01 /2005 ENT ENTRY CAME WITH NO TRANSCRIPT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A C vEGRA000 CHAVEZ, GRACIEL E. 0003671 448 12 2006 2004 Female Active 03/30/87 448 448 30/03/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 1 lstewh25.9 03.06.01'0 - 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 'NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT DIRTYYUS000 DIRIYE, YUSUF A. 0101231 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 10/07/87 448 448 E 02/22/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM KENYA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ELI,IODAV000 ELLIOTT, DAVID J. 0004053 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 05/13/88 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A FARAHSHE000 FARAH, SIIF.IKH NOUR S. 0095268 448 12 2006 2004 Male Active 02/24/87 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A FAY7,UILY000 FAYZULLAYEV, TI,YAZ 0101183 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 07/28/88 448 448 K 01/31/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A FIAMEVAA000 FLAME, VAATINA H. 0050693 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 01/02/88 448 448 E 09/15/2005 ENT ENTRY from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A G00DEDAV000 GOODE, DAVID R. 0011850 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 02/10/88 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A t. 1 11, ZACO00 GREEN, ZACHARY A. 0101215 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 05/05/88 448 448 E 02/14/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM MT. RAINIER IN BIG 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A HANG LIS000 HANG, LISA C. 0095168 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 01/04/88 448 448 E 04/03/2006 ENT ENTRY WILL BE RS STUDENT 17406 PUB R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 04/15/2006 ENT ENTRY PART TIME RS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A HAYATHOD000 HAYAT, HODELIA 0100964 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 07/30/85 448 448 E 09/22/2005 ENT ENTRY RST 17406 PUB R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A HERNAJOS000 HERNANDEZ, JOSE R. 0004102 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 01/20/88 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 1 17406 R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A HUYNHSAR000 HUYNH, SARAH H. 0003961 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 10/09/87 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A JOHNSMIC003 JOHNSON, MICHAEL D. 0100647 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 06/25/88 448 448 K 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM THOMAS JEFFERSON H 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 _ 448 448 448 2006 N/A KI TAM000 KI, TAMALII 0095283 448 12 2006 2005 Female Active 08/17/86 448 448 E 09/20/2005 RET RETAINED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 2 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS HIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DISTS DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MHRDAYS 7,IVORNEX000 LIVOREKA, NEXHMIJA 0095153 448 12 2006 2005 Female Active 11/18/87 448 448 F 09/15/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2005 12 YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 E 01/28/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A MCGRAJAM000 MCGRATH, JAMES J. 0100857 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 11/26/86 448 448 F 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A # GRAD YR 2006: 1 MILLEPHI001. MILLER, PHILLIP 0001834 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 11/29/85 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2005 12 YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A t'ARTMJUN000 PARTMAN, JUNEL L. 0004238 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 01/29/88 448 448 E 01/04/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A III SWA000 PATEL, SWASTIKA P. 0004359 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 01/23/88 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A PETE EVA000 PETE, EVA J. 0001892 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 07/04/88 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES F 01/04/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A RAMAJELV000 RAMAJ, ELVIS 0095037 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 04/03/87 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RF.T RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A ROARKJOS000 ROARK, JOSEPH M. 0004218 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 09/17/86 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A SANE CHA000 SANE, CHARLIE E. 0095377 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 08/27/85 448 448 F 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date 0 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A SARKIEDG000 SARKISYAN, EDGAR M. 0016148 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 10/20/87 448 448 F: 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A SAYIDHAM000 SAYIDI, HAMZA E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 0100854 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 01/01/88 448 448 NO TRANSCRIPTS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2006 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 3 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 1 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHI, TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 4110 SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SERVIBRE000 SERVIN, BRENDA L. 0095288 448 12 2006 2005 Female Active 10/10/86 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 448 448 448 2006 N/A SHAKHMAM000 SHAKHMANOV, MAMED 0101222 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 11/16/87 448 448 E 02/22/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A SMITHKIM000 SMITH, KIMBERLEY L. 0001895 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 10/27/87 448 448 E 01/28/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 04/15/2006 ENT ENTRY PT RS STUDENT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A TEJEDHEC000 TEJEDA, HECTOR E 03/02/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2006 FROM MEXICO 0101243 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT 448 448 R 100 0 0 0 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 04/19/87 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 'rOLO AM0000 TOLD, AMOS B. 0095379 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 04/05/86 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A TOLO SAN000 TOLO, SANNAH S. 0095380 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 08/03/85 448 448 fil 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2006 N/A TRACYTH0000 TRACY, THOMAS N. 0001811 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 07/31/87 448 448 F. 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 1 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A TURA NAS000 TURA, NASIR H. 0095264 448 12 2006 2004 Male Active 12/27/86 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 1 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A TUSTIJOA000 TUSTISON, JOANNE A. 0050039 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 03/13/88 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 02/23/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A UTU KEN000 UTU, KENNARD E. 0100872 448 12 2006 2004 Male Active 09/09/85 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY CHEIF SEALTH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 01/04/2006 ENT ENTRY REINSTATED 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A W IJOR000 WILLIS, JORDAN W. 0095390 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 01/28/86 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 COM R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 05/23/2006 ENT ENTRY RETURN FROM NON- ATTF.NDA 17406 PUB R 16 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A 448 448 0 0 0 448 448 0 0 448 448 0 0 Date: 06/01/06 4 PAGE: latewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ID NBR OFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS WOLDEMES000 WOLDESLASSIE, MESERET S. 0095279 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 12/21/85 448 448 E 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A YMERIMAR000 YMERI, MARIO 0050036 448 12 2006 2006 Male Active 11/13/87 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 YES E 01/04/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A YUAL SAM000 YUAL, SAMUEL M. 0095301 448 12 2006 2005 Male Active 01/01/86 448 448 N 09/06/2005 RET RETAINED District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A MAD RAC000 ZIAD, RACHEL S. 0101249 448 12 2006 2006 Female Active 05/28/87 448 448 E 03/03/2006 ENT ENTRY JOHN MARSHALL IN SEATTL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 N/A 8 GRAD YR 2006: 23 AGALISOF000 AGALIYEVA, SOFIYA 0101122 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 06/21/89 448 448 F. 12/17/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A 111/1 AL1000 AYDINOV, ALIZAR 0100700 948 11 2007 2007 Male Active 02/19/88 448 448 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY using name on birt cert 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A BEROVM.TL000 BEROV1C, MILOS 0100830 448 11 2007 2006 Male Active 01/26/88 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY REDWOOD 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 09/13/2005 ENT ENTRY REDWOOD 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES K 09/16/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM REDMON HS IN REDMO 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A 448 448 0 0 0 BLEDSNET000 BLEDSOE, NETANYA V. 0015892 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 03/14/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A CARRIVIC000 CARRILLO SORIA, VICTOR A. 0100844 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 03/28/88 448 448 N 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A CAVCINED000 CAVCIC, NEDIM 0004371 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 02/21/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY enrolled in running sta 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A CHAKHGUL000 CHAKHALOVA, GULNORA I. 0101022 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 08/16/89 448 448 6 10/17/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2007 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 5 lstewh25.p 03.06.01:0-010029 STUDENT KEY NAME Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT !NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHI, DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS CHAKHZHA000 CHAKHALIDZE, ZHAMAL A. 0100652 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 03/11/88 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM KRASNODAR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A DONALREU000 DONALDSON, REUBEN L. 0016265 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 12/18/88 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 448 448 448 2007 N/A 448 448 R 100 0 0 0 DUBNOANN000 DUBNOW, ANNA 0101091 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 02/22/89 448 448 F. 11/21/2005 ENT ENTRY RUNNING START 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 11/22/2005 ENT ENTRY RUNNING START 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A FGGP:RRYA000 EGGERS, RYAN M. 0100900 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 08/14/88 448 448 E 09/20/2005 ENT ENTRY NORTH THURSTON 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A GONZAASH001 GONZALEZ, ASHALEY F. 0100855 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 05/08/89 448 448 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY OKED BY MR HAMMOND 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A GONZAFRA001 GONZALEZ, FRANCISCO 0101196 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 06/01/89 448 448 5 02/02/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2007 N/A HERNAR00000 HERNANDEZ, ROGELIO 0100807 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 11/06/88 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY EVERGREEN HS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A KAHSSADT000 KAHSSAY, ADIL I. 0101159 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 06/16/89 448 448 E 01/26/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM BC ISLAMIC SCHOOL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A KAPETADN000 KAPETANOVIC, ADNAN 0015307 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 09/08/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A KNOLLJAK000 KNOLLMEYER, JAKE C. 0050773 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 04/25/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MARTIJKS000 MARTINEZ, JESUS A. 0095243 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 06/06/89 448 448 8 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MASONSOP000 MASON, SOPHIA L. 0100870 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 08/03/89 448 448 8 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY FR CLEVELAND 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MAZMANIG000 MAZMANOVA, NIGAR E 02/01/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 0101190 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 09/10/88 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2007 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 6 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL HNTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time; 8 ;18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBA DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL, DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT MCCOYSHA000 MCCOY, SHANLEIGH C. 0050585 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 03/21/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MCKIN1AN000 MCKINLEY, IAN J. 0100874 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 06/28/89 448 448 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY RIVERDALE HS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MCLEOJOS000 MCLEOD, JOSHUA S. 0009996 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 09/15/89 448 448 K 03/03/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MISUTELV000 MISUT, ELVIN 0015738 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 10/05/88 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A MOHAMADE000 MOHAMED, ADEN A. 0095216 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 01/01/89 448 448 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A OLO ANE000 OLO, ANETEREA 0100895 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 04/18/89 448 448 E 09/16/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM AM. SAMOA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A I-. 5OMA000 PACHECO, OMAR I. 0050895 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 01/27/89 448 448 E 09/02/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A PARRAJEN000 PARRA, JENNIFER 0004201 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 06/28/88 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A PAULSBET000 PAULSEN, BETH A. 0075002 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 04/09/89 448 448 E 04/25/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM HIGHLINE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A RASH IALI000 RASHID, ALI Y. N 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2007 SAHLEKAO000 SAELEE, KAOMEY M. E 09/14/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2007 TYEE HS RIFE RA1000 RIFE, RAIANNE M. 0101169 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 12/25/88 448 448 K 01/10/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM FRANKLIN PIERCE H. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A RODRICAR001 RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS 0100831 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 05/20/89 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY EVERGREEN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 01/31/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 , 448 448 448 2007 N/A SACRAMENTO 0100801 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 01 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0100885 448 11 2007 2008 Male Active 10/11/89 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 7 PAGE: lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 SINGHKUL001 S1NGH, KULDEEP E 04/28/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 VAI.AVCOL000 VALAVALA, COLLEEN T. K 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2007 k GRAD YR 2007; 41 AHMEDFIN000 AHMED, FININ B. E 09/19/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2008 FROM RENTON H.S. KENYA 0004397 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SALIHSEL000 SALIHOVIC, SELENA 0015742 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 05/12/89 K 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 02/16/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A 448 448 0 0 0 SARACHAJ000 SARACEVIC, HAJRUDIN D. 0015741 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 05/22/89 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A SIDHURAV000 SIDHU, RAVEEN K. 0100691 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 05/03/89 448 448 F. 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 YES E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY CHRISTIAN FAITH SCH 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A 0101308 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 05/29/87 448 448 FROM INDIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2007 N/A SJOL I.1N000 SJOL, LINDSAY E. 0015089 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 10/30/88 448 448 09/26/2005 ent ENTRY from Truman High School 17406 R 100 0 0 0 1 111148 448 448 2007 N/A TOLENMAA000 TOLENTINO, MAAN JOY E. 0009992 448 11. 2007 2007 Female Active 01/03/89 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A TOMOSCHR000 TOMOSON, CHRISTIFER D. 0015330 448 11 2007 2007 Male Active 10/29/88 448 448 F 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2007 N/A 448 11 2007 2007 Female Active 07/29/89 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A AHMEDABD006 AHMED, ABDTFATAH H. 0101081 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 12/30/89 448 448 E 11/14/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME WITH NO TRANSCRIPT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A 0100902 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 12/01/89 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A ArAI,IANG000 ATALIG, ANGELA D. 0101316 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 04/24/90 448 448 � OS/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM SPANAWAY LAKE H.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2008 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 8 latewh25.9 03.06.01. 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL III DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIET# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS — NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT AWEISABD000 AWEIS, ABDULAAHI M. 0101156 448 10 2008 2006 Male Active 01/01/88 448 448 E 01/10/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM ROOSEVELT H.S. IN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A AYDINFAR000 AYDINOV, FARMAN 0100702 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 08/14/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY USING NAME FROM BIRTH C 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A HARREGER000 BARRF.RA, GERARDO 0100841 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 11/06/88 448 448 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY ABERDEEN SCH DIST 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A CAROSJES000 CAROSINO, JESSICA A. 0075128 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 11/26/89 448 448 E 02/01/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A CHAKHRUV000 CHAKHAL.IDZE, RUVEYDA 0101189 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 04/05/90 448 448 N 02/07/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A CHHOEDEN000 CHHOEUN, DENO S. 0100842 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 11/16/89 448 448 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY DAVID DOUGLAS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 YES 0 01/31/2006 ENT ENTRY READMIT PER A.P. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2006 2008 10 YES E 05/18/2006 ENT ENTRY READMIT PER A.P. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A CRUDUKER000 CRUDUP, KERRAINE S. 0100838 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 07/15/89 448 448 F. 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY HIGHLINE DISTRICT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A DELOSEVE000 DELOSREYES, EVELIN R. 0101238 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 05/06/89 448 448 E 02/27/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM CABRILLO H.S IN LO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A DTRIYHAL000 DIRIYE, HALIMO 0100693 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 01/01/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A FELDEEZE000 FELDER, EZEKIAL W. 0100646 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 06/28/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM J F KENNDY HIGH SC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A FOLA RJC000 FOLA, RICHARD T. 0004398 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 10/28/89 448 448 N 09/19/2005 ENT ENTRY STU W/D BUT SHOWS ACTIV 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A EASH000 FUTRELL, ASHLEIGH M. F . 0100799 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 08/09/90 448 448 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY SEALTH, SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A PAGE: 9 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029' FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBA DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 11,NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GRIFFMAX000 GRIFFIN, MAXWELL D. 0075813 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 08/01/90 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A GULALRUS000 GULALIYEV, RUSLAN 0101181 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 08/01/90 448 448 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A GULALSAB000 GULALTYEVA, SABINA 0101065 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 11/27/89 448 448 E 11/01/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME WITH NO TRANSCRIPT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A HEISSTAI000 HEISSER, TAIWO L. 0050711 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 05/25/90 448 448 E 01/18/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM CLEVELAND H.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A IZZATSHA000 T7.ZATOV, SHAKIR 0101064 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 12 /27/89 448 448 N 11/01/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME WITH NO TRANSCRIPT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A JIMERDEN000 JIMERSON, DENNIS W. 0100876 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 10/12/89 448 448 E 09/13/2005 ENT ENTRY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A • FAR000 KAZI, FARHANA I. 0101203 448 1.0 2008 2008 Female Active 08/23/88 448 448 E 02/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM TYEE IN HIGHLINE D 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A IOVATCHR000 LOVATA, CHRISTOPHER T. 0100768 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 07/15/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY KENT MERIDIAN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A MCCOYASH000 MCCOY, ASHLEY M. 0100818 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 09/15/88 448 448 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM THOMAS JEFFERSON H 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A MILTOSAR000 MILTON, SAREYA M. 0100822 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 04/14/90 448 448 K 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY SEATTLE SCH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A MURPHRrc000 MURPHY, RICHARD G. 0100901 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 12/15/89 448 448 E 09/20/2005 ENT ENTRY NORTH THURSTON 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A MURTAMIK000 MURTAZAYEV, MIKAIL A. 0101256 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 08/30/89 448 448 E 03/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A NSF.NGANT000 NSENGWA, ANTHONY Z. 0100676 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 06/21/89 448 448 •09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY SPEAKS LOZI NOT IN SELE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 10 lstewh25.p 03.06.01. 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL O DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT OMAR ISM000 OMAR, TSMAIL I. 0100845 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 03/30/90 448 448 E 09/09/2005 ENT ENTRY NO TRANSCRIPTS FROM 9TH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A RAJICDEN000 RAJIC, DENIS 0016161 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 05/16/90 448 448 E 09/14/2005 ENT ENTRY RE ENROLLED 17406 PUB R 100 0 • 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A RAMILAZI000 RAMIL, AZIEL JERICO 0. 0100837 448 10 2008 2007 Male Active 07/09/89 448 448 E 09/09/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME FROM FRANKLIN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A RAMrRERE000 RAMIREZ JAVAN, ERENDIRA 0090163 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 06/22/89 448 448 E 11/28/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MEXICO FORMER SMS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A ROHINAR1000 ROBINSON, ARIANA L. 0004401 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 09/14/89 448 448 1•: 09/13/2006 ENT ENTRY CHIEF SEALTH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A RODRTSHA000 RODRIGUEZ, SHAKIR Y. 0100879 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 02/08/90 448 448 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY CLEVELAND HS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A Fc5OFE000 ROJAS, OFELIA M. 0101260 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 05/08/90 448 448 K 03/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A ROUN JAF000 ROUN, JAFAR 0101184 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 11/28/89 448 448 K 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERED FROM CHIEF S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A SANTOALB000 SANTOS RAMIREZ, ALBERTO A. 0100671 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 04/11/90 448 448 K 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY NO TRANSCRIPT / WHEN EN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A SANTO1RE000 SANTOS, IRENE E. 0101324 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 12/04/89 448 448 N 05/10/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM CAMELBACK HS IN P 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A SHAKHNAZ000 SHAKHMANOVA, NAZIRA Z. 0101221 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 07/22/90 448 448 E 02/22/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A STRAWLAM000 STRAWS, LAMARIA E. 0101266 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 1.1/06/89 448 448 E 03/17/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM FOSS H.S. IN TACOM 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A IFz APAR000 TEBIANI PARMIDA 0100683 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 09/16/89 448 448 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME WITH NO RECORDS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A PAGE: 11 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 TUPUODEB000 TUPUOLA, DEBBIE E 01/05/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2008 Y0HANSAR000 YOHANNES, SARA B. E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2008 FROM SAMOA 0101144 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR OFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS :NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 0.1/2S/90 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A VELASSUS000 VELASQUEZ, SUSANA 0101100 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 08/01/89 448 448 E 12/02/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM FEDERAL WAY H.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A WILKIMAE000 WILKINSON, MAEKAYLA 0004260 448 10 2008 2007 Female Active 05/17/89 448 448 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A 0100687 448 10 2008 2008 Female Active 06/28/90 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A ZEMANALE000 ZEMANEK, ALEXANDER J. 0100651 448 10 2008 2008 Male Active 10/16/89 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FR J F KENNEDY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2008 N/A # GRAD YR 2008: 46 ACOSTCES000 ACOSTA, CESAR A. 0090450 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/31/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 1111148 448 448 2009 N/A ADAM HAN000 ADAM, HANNA D. 0051133 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/21/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ADAM HAS000 ADAN, HASSAN M. 0101043 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/01/90 448 448 E 10/25/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 03/13/2006 ENT ENTRY never attended elsewher 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ALSAMSH1001 ALSAMARRAI, SHIRAZ A. 0016693 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/08/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ARMSTDYL000 ARMSTRONG, DYLAN F. 0015385 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/13/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ATTARARA000 ATTARASHANY, ARAM 0090158 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/26/90 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A AWEISBIN000 AWEIS, BINTI M. 0101278 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/01/90 448 448 I 03/31./2006 ENT ENTRY FROM CHICAGO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 12 lstewh25.p 03.06.01. 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BTRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT AZIZ MAN000 AZIZ, MANSOOR K. 0075274 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/07/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BECKETRE000 BECKER, TREVOR T. 0090477 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/26/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HELCHZ.AC000 BEL,CHER, ZACHARY M. 0075284 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/19/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BENNETRE000 BENNETT, TRENA 0100892 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/18/90 448 448 F. 09/15/2005 ENT ENTRY FR PACIFIC MIDDLE SCHOO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 04/17/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM MT RAINIER IN SEAT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BENTOBRE000 BENTON, BRE ANA L. 0075592 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/13/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY JASON LEE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BtNGHSON000 BINGHAM, SONDRIA C. 0051181 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/14/91 448 448 ca 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2009 N/A BIRNEJON000 BIRNEL, JONATHAN A. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 BISNOOTT000 BISNO, OTTO W. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 HROOKDOM000 BROOKS, DOMINIQUE D. E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2009 BROWNDAL000 BROWN, DALTON M. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 0051189 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/03/91 448 448 1.7406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090096 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/21/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A BRDARMEL001 BRDAREVIC, MELDIN 0051322 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/13/90 448 448 K 09/05/2005 PRO PROMOTED from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0100790 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/06/90 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A BROOKLEE000 BROOKE, LEEANN D. 0050849 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/08/91 448 448 F 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BROWNAAR001 BROWN, AARON J. 0016263 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/22/9] 448 448 E 11/16/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 X 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0050304 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/24/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A PAGE: 13 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME v DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT C E TIM000 CORDERO, TIMOTHY E. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ,NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT Time: 8:18 AM Data: 06/01/06 ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PAGE: 14 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS PURE NIK000 BURK, NIKOLE K. 0050547 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/24/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A BURRITYL000 BURRINGTON, TYLER J. 0075258 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/17/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HUSROCHR000 BUSROE, CHRISTIAN 0100448 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/02/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CARMISHA000 CARMICHAEL, SHANTEL M. 0050675 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/30/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CARRECHR000 CARREON, CHRISTIAN R. 0090423 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/27/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CASTAPER000 CASTANEDA, PERLA A. 0090186 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/18/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A •KVA000 CERVANTES, EVAN E. 0075266 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/12/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CHAKHGUL001 CHAKHALOVA, GULMIRA 0101024 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/07/91 448 448 E 10/17/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CHHENMON000 CHHEN, MONYRITH 0090449 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/06/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A COLBF.ANT000 COLBERT, ANTHONY F. 0101036 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/18/91 448 448 5 10/18/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A COLEMKAT000 COLEMAN, KATHRYN P. 0090376 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/20/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A COLESAIS000 COLES, AISHA D. 0090349 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/10/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0090241 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/25/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A letewh25.p 03.06.01:0 - 010029 DIMITPET000 DIMITROV, PETAR S. E 10/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2009 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AN Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAI, SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS O NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT C0RDIDEN000 CORDIC, DENIS 0016518 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/26/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CRUDUDAI000 CRUDUP, DAISHA L. 0101042 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/27/91 448 448 E 10/24/2005 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERING FROM INGRAM 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A CUREVZER000 CUREVAC, ZERINA 0090257 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/31/92 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DAHIRSHA000 DAHIR, SHARMARKE A. 0090357 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/01/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DANG VU 000 DANG, VU T. 0075587 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/05/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DANGCBRA000 DANGC, BRANDON F. 0100668 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/09/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A �DAS000 DARCHVILLE, DASHJANIE D. 0101099 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/22/91 448 448 E 1.1/30/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM LINCOLN H.S. IN TA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DIAZ MAY000 DIAZ LEON, MAYRA 0090461 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/18/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DIAZ VAN000 DIAZ, VANESSA 0076027 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/10/91 448 448 N 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DICKEJAL000 DICKERSON, JALESSA G. 0090419 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/14/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0101014 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/24/90 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A DIMITROS000 DIMITROVA, ROSITSA S. 0101015 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/24/90 448 448 N 10/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DTPTYMAR000 DIRIYE, MARYAM A. 0100692 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/01/91 448 448 •09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 15 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME LS( DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DISTH DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS DOTSOICO000 DOTSON, ICOLA C. 0016808 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/04/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DOUVIBRE000 DOUVIA, BRETT A. 0075283 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/17/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DUNCADEN000 DUNCAN, DENZELL L. 0090446 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/06/90 448 448 N 02/03/2006 ENT ENTRY From seattle urban acad 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A EBERLMAR000 EBERLE, MARLO A. 0100648 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/07/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM LAKE WASHINGTON SC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ELM] ABD001 ELMT, ABDULWAHID A. 0101330 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/25/91 448 448 E 05/10/2006 ENT ENTRY ROOSEVELT HS IN ST LOUI 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ELMI ABD003 ELMI, ABDINASIR A. 0101331 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/27/90 448 448 E 05/10/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM ROOSEVELT HS IN S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A • F. HEL000 F,NGUF.RRA, HELEN P. 0100789 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/02/90 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A !•:RAZOCES001 ERA'' /,O, CESAR 0. 0050820 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/05/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ESQUEJOS000 ESQUEDA, JOSE C. 0090154 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/21/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A EXTINNIC000 F.XTINE, NICOLE E. 0075276 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/18/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A I'ARRESHA000 FARRELL, SHARAYAH A. 0075504 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/29/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A FARRITRO002 FARRIS, TROY A. 0050357 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/06/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A FL URKER000 FLEURINE, KERBY 0090301 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/05/9]. 448 448 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 16 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME FLOREITZ000 FLORES, ITZETL E 02/27/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 FLOREMAR004 FLORES, MARTHA G. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 FORD DOM000 FORD, DOMINIQUE B. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 GARCISAR000 GARCIA, SARITA J. F. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL IO DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT 0101239 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/04/88 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2009 N/A 0016490 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/23/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090143 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/29/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090047 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/01/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A GASTEADA001 GASTF.LUM, ADAM A. 0090233 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/19/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 1.00 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GEBREBAN000 GEBREKRISTOS, BANA K. 0075887 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/13/90 448 448 F. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A • SAM001 GEBREHIWET, SAMSON K. 0050949 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/14/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GONZAJOS005 GONZALEZ, JOSUE 0101197 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/12/91 448 448 E 02/02/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GONZANAT000 GONZALEZ, NATHAN E. 0100856 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/14/91 448 448 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY OUT OF DIST. OKED BY MR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GRIFFDAL000 GRIFFITH, DALE D. 0100787 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/27/91 448 448 K 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY AKI KUROSE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GRIFFDON000 GRIFFIN, DONNOVIN R. 0100819 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/20/91 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A GUST1ANI000 GUSTI, ANISSA M. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 G , '''EGER000 GUTIERREZ, GERALD V. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 0090251 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/28/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090042 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/10/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 17 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AN Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL * DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT HALL JAM000 HALL, JAMAL 0016436 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/26/90 448 448 N 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HANG PAN000 HANG, PANG F. 0101283 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/30/90 448 448 E 04/04/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM CLEVELAND HS IN SE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HANG SEA000 HANG, SEAN T. 0090230 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/14/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HAWEZZOZ000 HAWEZ, ZOZAN R. 0015792 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/29/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HIMORMEL000 HIMOR, MELODY C. 0100746 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/15/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FR TYEE HS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HODGIJOS000 HODGTNS, JOSEPH 0101272 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/11/91 448 448 K 03/21/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A •AMB000 HODGSON, AMBER D. 0015605 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/26/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HOLDABR0000 HOLDAAS, BROOK T. 0075280 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/16/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HUFF TSA000 HUFF, ISAIAH J. 0075983 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/28/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY Mtn View H.S. in Auburn 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A HUNTEMAR000 HUNTER, MARKESHA M. 0051182 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/10/91 448 448 F. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 1DOM AMB000 IDOM, AMBERLYN L. 0076031 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/30/90 448 448 E 10/26/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ISAKOSUL000 ISAKOVTC, SULEYMAN 0050639 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/11/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 ,., 448 448 448 2009 N/A JACKSREB000 JACKSON, REBECCA M. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 0075291 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/04/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A PAGE: 18 latewh25.9 03.06.01.0 - 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST8 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT JACKSSTA002 JACKSON, STACEY D. 0090222 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/30/91 448 448 E. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A JIMENEDU000 JTMENEZ, EDUARDO 0090466 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/13/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES N 12/09/2005 ENT ENTRY readmit per A.P. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES N 03/14/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A JOBE SAR000 JOBE CUBA, SARAH A. 0100679 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/25/92 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY HOME SCHOOLED/ BAND ONL 17406 PUB R 14 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES R 03/03/2006 ENT ENTRY HOME SCHOOLED/ BAND ONL 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 448 448 0 0 JOHNSCAP000 JOHNSON, CAPRICIA R. 0100821 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/17/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY SEATTLE SCH DIST 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A .JOHNSISI000 JOHNSON, ISIAS A. 0016384 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/22/91 448 448 111/1 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A .JOHNSREG000 JOHNSON, REGAVIUS D. 0076130 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/21/91 448 448 E 09/15/2005 ENT ENTRY PACIFIC MS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KALCHALE000 KALCHIK, ALEXANDER S. 0075296 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/22/90 448 448 F. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KARTEKYL000 KARTES, KYLE J. 0075921 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/31/91 448 448 F. 09/05/2005 ADV ADVANCED from Showalter 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KASSAABA000 KASSA, ABAYNESiI B. 0100659 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/14/90 448 448 5 09/05/2005 F.NT ENTRY LAST SCHOOL BERRYSESSA, 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KATOSOL1000 KATOSANG, OLIVERA I. 0100660 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/13/91 448 448 E 09/17/2005 F.NT ENTRY MEYUNS ELEM KOROR, PALA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KAUR KAM000 KAUR, KAMALJIT 0090175 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/26/91 448 448 F 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 X 448 448 448 2009 N/A NAZI SHA000 KAZI, SHADIKA I. 0101202 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/15/90 448 448 F. 02/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM EVERGREEN H.S. IN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 19 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBA DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL IO DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT KLAUSDER000 KLAUS, DEREK M. 0090044 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/05/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KOSELJES000 KOSEL, JESSE T. 0050375 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/07/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A KULE YUS000 KULE, YUSUF A. 0090480 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/01/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A LAHA.IGE0000 LAHAIK, GEOFFREY M. 0090267 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/19/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A I.ALONKIM000 LALONDE, KIMBERLY K. 0100048 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/09/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A i.E. CON000 LE, CONNIE P. 0075394 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/09/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A L 'ALE000 LEMUS RICO, ALEJANDRO 0090317 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/22/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A LEWINTAY000 LEWIN, TAYLOR M. 0050896 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/05/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A I.OMONSITA000 LOMONOV, SHA1SMAIL 0101305 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/22/90 448 448 E 04/24/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A LOPEZEDW000 LOPEZ, EDWIN 0015790 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/30/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MAGSOCHA000 MAGSOMBOL, CHARMAINE G. 0100658 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/18/90 448 448 K 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY MC KNIGHT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MAMUKTSR000 MAMUKADZE, ISRAFIL I. 0090481 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/10/91 448 448 N 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A M ADAV000 MANTAGO, DAVID C. 0101217 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/07/90 448 448 02/14/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM FRANKLIN H.S. IN S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 20 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 MARQUMAR000 MARQUEZ ROJAS, MARIO A. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 MEKONABR000 MEKONNEN, ABRAHAM M. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAI, SCHI, DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDA YS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT MANNILAL000 MANNING, LALIA J. 0100664 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/24/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY DON'T KNOW CKECKED ON i 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MARBEAIY000 MARBET, AIYANNA R. 0015759 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/17/91 448 448 F 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0016011 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/14/91 448 448 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 N/A MARTIALL000 MARTIN, ALLISON T. 0050315 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/06/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 .448 448 448 2009 N/A MARTICAS000 MARTIN, CASEY R. 0016144 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/23/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MARTIMIG000 MARTINEZ, MIGUEL P. 0075998 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/08/90 448 448 F: 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A •LEN000 MASTEN, LENARD T. 0100945 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/19/90 448 448 E 09/21/2005 ENT ENTRY FR. MT TAHOMA H.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 01/25/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MATHII,AY000 MATHIS, LAYNE M. 0050801 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/06/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MATVENAT000 MATVEYEVA, NATALIYA V. 0090220 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/05/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MAYERAMA000 MAYERS, AMANDA M. 0050567 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/30/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MCCARRIL000 MCCARTHY, RILEY E. 0075256 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/11/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MCKNIAND000 MCKNIGHT, ANDRE 0100853 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/23/90 448 448 E 09/09/2005 ENT ENTRY FR DIMMITT 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 X 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0016004 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/19/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 21 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GA GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHRATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS MELTOJOS000 MELTON, JOSHUA J. 0100781 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/26/91 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY NORTHWOOD, KENT 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MENDOAMA000 MENDOZA, AMANDA M. 0100669 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/18/91 448 448 F 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM HIGHLINE SCHOOL DI 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MICHAADA000 MICHAUD, ADANO M. 0100038 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/02/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MTKOSMAK000 MIKOSSYANCHIK, MAKSIM J. 0090294 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/18/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MILLEJOS000 MILLER, JOSEPH S. 0101274 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/22/90 448 448 E 03/28/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM TYEE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MISUTELA000 MISUT, ELA 0015830 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/05/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A • ER000 MONKAH, BERNICE 0016669 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/01/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MONTUJEN000 MONTUFAR, JENNIFER A. 0050868 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/12/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MORAVCHA001 MORAVONG, CHANRASMT 0015895 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/15/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MULL, TI0000 MULL, TIONNA M. 0101294 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/01/90 448 448 E 04/24/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RAINIER BEACH IN S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A MURTAKEM000 MURTAZAYEV, KEMRAN A. 0101257 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/21/90 448 448 E 03/08/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A NAIR NIC000 NAIR, NICHOLAS N. 0075386 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/25/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A RANC000 NAVARRO, ANGELICA 0090174 N 4 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/30/90 448 448 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 22 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY BEN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 1 1, -- ---- NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT NF.EDIID A000 NEEDHAM, D ANGELO J. 0051300 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/19/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A NGUYESEL000 NGUYEN, SELINA P. 0100772 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/20/91 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ORR1ECHR000 OBRIEN, CHRISTOPHER M. 0015853 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/17/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A OLIPAJEA000 O1,1PARES, JEANNETTE T. 0100665 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/25/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A OLIVIPET000 OLIVIER, PETER S. 0050702 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/26/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A OMEROELD000 OMEROVIC, ELDINA 0016024 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/02/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A (S MIC001 ONEIL, MICHAEL J. 0050317 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/16/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ORMENERM000 ORMENI, ERMES 0051066 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/24/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A DXENRJEN000 OXENRIDER, JENNIFER L. 0015547 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/27/90 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PALANELA000 PALANI, ELAINE J. 0090124 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/10/91 E 09/05/2005 PRO PROMOTED from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB 448 448 448 2009 N/A 448 448 R 100 0 0 0 PALANTAT000 PALANCHUK, TATYANA S. 0016292 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/04/90 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAPONSAR000 PAPONJAK, SARA 0015611 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/17/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A P A LES000 PARRA, LESLIE G. 0051158 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/06/90 448 448 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 04/18/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 23 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL * DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT PASTREMI000 PASTRANA, EMILY A. 0075701 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/11/90 448 448 E.' 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PATELDEE000 PATEL, DEEPAL P. 0075994 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/17/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PENCHMIR000 PENCHEVA, MIRELA S. 0090182 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/09/91 448 448 E: 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PERDUVIV000 PERDUE, VIVIAN R. 0075498 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/02/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PEREZCAR000 PEREZ, CARLOS 0090052 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/13/90 448 448 E 12/09/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PHAN CIN000 PHAN, CINDY J. 0090239 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/31/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 11111 LUC000 PHITSANOUKANE, LUCK 0075277 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/23/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A POINDBRI000 POINDEXTER, BRITANI R. 0100645 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/29/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM KENT MERIDIAN JR H 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A POI,NETOM000 POLNETT, TOMMIE E. 0075877 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/13/91. 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A POTH KIM000 POTH, KIMBERLY R. 0100820 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/29/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY RENTON 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A QUEZAELI000 QUEZADA, ELIZABETH J. 0016928 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/24/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES E 02/01/2006 ENT ENTRY HIGHLINE HIGH SCHOOL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A REID JOH001. REID, JOHN R. 0051078 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/12/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ROBERNIC000 ROBERTS, NICOLE Y. R 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 0050748 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/03/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 24 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:18 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT RODR1AME000 RODRIGUEZ, AMELIA 0090127 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/23/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ROSS KAT000 ROSS, KATIE R. 0015559 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 12/11/90 448 448 H 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ROSSOPAT000 ROSSON, PATRICK A. 0090472 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/31/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A RUIZ ROS000 RUIZ VILLA, ROSA 0101187 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 02/07/91 448 448 K 02/01/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A RUSSOL,AC000 RUSSO, LACEY L. 0075292 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/12/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SAMUEANI000 SAMUEL, ANITA R. 0015758 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/03/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A •DIA003 SANTOS, DIANALYNN 0090166 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 04/09/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SAYSOCLA000 SAYSON, CLAIRIESSA E. E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2009 TYEE HS 0100809 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/19/90 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A SCHENSTE000 SCHENCK, STEVEN W. 0100626 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12 /10/90 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY HIGHLINE CHOICE ACADEMY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SCHNELEE000 SCHNEIDER, LEE ANN 0075257 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/16/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SCHROKIM000 SCHROEDER, KIMBERLY E. 0090435 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 05/15/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SCHWATYL000 SCHWALD, TYLER R. 0015549 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 01/31/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 YES K 03/20/2006 ENT ENTRY RETURN FROM ABSENCES 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A •JOS000 SERVIN GARNTCA, JOSE J. 0090234 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/10/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED) 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A PAGE: 25 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SHAKBAZA000 SHAKBAZOVA, AZAMAT 0101019 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/04/91 448 448 E 10/11/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SLUGINIK000 SLUGIC, NIKOLA 0100675 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 06/30/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY MEEKER MIDDLE SCHOOL IN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A SMITHJAR001 SMITH, JARVIS J. 0100631 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/23/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A STAI,ETTA000 STALEY, TIARA P. 0050575 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/30/91 448 448 E 09/05/2005 PRO PROMOTED from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A STEVEJAC000 STEVENS, JACOB T. 0100093 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/10/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A STRIKBRE000 STRIKER, BREANNA D. 0015550 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/29/90 448 448 F. 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A Ill JEF SUTTON, JEFFREY 0075269 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 10/18/90 448 448 E 03/03/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM HILLSIDE IN BELLEV 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A TALAMIVA000 TALAMONI, IVAN P. 0090354 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/17/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A TALLETEN000 TAI,LEY, TENISHA M. 0051537 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/17/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A FANG DAN000 TANG, DANIEL D. 0051318 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/25/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A TAPIAJOE001 TAPIA, JOEL 0100828 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 12/12/90 448 448 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY CA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A TKBTAHAR000 TEBIANIAN, BARDIA 0100686 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/26/91 448 448 1•: 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A I PKYL000 THOMPSON, KYLE A. 0075295 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/15/91 448 448 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 26 letewh25.p 03.06.01'0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME * DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT TILLMCAS000 TILLMAN, CASSANDRA A. N 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 TIPOVNAD000 TIPOVICI, NADEJDA S. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 'I'OEAITA0000 TOEAINA, TAUMALOTO 0100884 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/14/91 448 448 E 09/14/2005 ENT ENTRY AM SAMOA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A TONG KON000 TONG, KONGCHEY E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 TRAN SAR000 TRAM, SARAH T. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 TUN TLE000 TUN, ILEANA 1. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2009 •SHA000 TUPUA, SHARLYN F. 0090293 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/27/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A UHTLAMAG000 UHILA, MAGIC M. E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 E 03/10/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 2009 VILLAFL0000 VILLA, FLOR K 02/01/2006 ENT ENTRY 448 448 448 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL, 0050355 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 06/25/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090382 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/01/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090067 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 02/01/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090197 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 11/11/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090381 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 09/19/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090106 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/09/91 448 448 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 YES 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A UNG UYH000 UNG, UYHUN 0050371 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 08/09/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A UTU UT0000 UTU, UTU M. 0090056 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 07/10/91 448 448 K 09/05/2005 ENT ENTRY from Century Junior Hip 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 0101188 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/15/91 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2009 N/A WALDOBEN000 WALDOCK, BENJAMIN J. 0050333 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/31/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WAL1JaHIA000 WALLACE, BIANCA L. 0101010 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 03/09/91 448 448 E 10/05 /2005 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERED FROM EVERGRE 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 27 letewh25.p 03.06.01'0 - 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:18 AN ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHRATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS WALSHMEG000 WALSH BAZAN, MEGAN 0090066 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/10/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WASUGABD000 WASUGE, ABDI 0101072 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 05/14/92 448 448 H 11/07/2005 ENT ENTRY CAME FROM RENTON WITH W 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WEST ROB000 WEST, ROBERT J. 0075623 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 11/13/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WILBUKAR000 WILBURN, KAREN J. 0101149 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 10/27/91 448 448 E 01/05/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM MT.LAKE TERRACE H. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WILLIJAS000 W.ILLTAMS, JASMINE E. 0076080 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 07/23/91 448 448 H 09/13/2005 ENT ENTRY from Century Junior Hig 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WILL1JON000 WILLIAMS, JONATHAN D. 0090447 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/18/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A 1 11 1 / F'RE000 WILSON, FREDRICK G. 0100836 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 09/06/90 448 448 E 09/09/2005 ENT ENTRY OUT OF DISTRICT OK MR. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A WOLDEFTL000 WOLDEMARTAM, FILMON 0016408 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 03/06/90 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A YOHANSEG000 YOHANNES, SEGEN M. 0090286 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 01/29/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A YOUNGLEV000 YOUNG, LEVI H. 0015564 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/09/91 448 448 H 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ZAMORDUL000 ZAMORA, DULCE 0075784 448 09 2009 2009 Female Active 08/09/91 448 448 E 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A ZEKICIRF000 ZEK.IC, IRFAN 0015712 448 09 2009 2009 Male Active 04/16/91 448 448 K 09/06/2005 PRO PROMOTED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2009 N/A # GRAD YR 2009: 213 • Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 28 letewh25.p ti 03.06.01.0- 010029 • TOTAL E/W STUDENTS: 240 • - -- -GRADE TOTALS GRAD._ YR GRADE MALE FEMALE BOTH TOTAL: 122 118 End of report FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ]RIB! /WITHDRAWAL REPORT 2006 33 33 66 2007 22 28 50 2008 32 24 56 2009 35 33 68 e 9 Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 143 G od 6 o e � Yl tn w. \c)¢,V - acr �`" a12 s qt Cn.e\ ,;(\ 0 u\A +\-) PAGE: 21 lstewh25.p t t 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME IIIO DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ABDI. MAY000 ABDI, MAYMON M. 0095478 448 12 2006 2005 Femal 01/01/87 448 448 W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 R iii 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES ABDIRAHM000 ABDIRAHIM, AHMED M. 0095456 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 01/01/86 448 448 W 05/19/2006 U1 Unknown non attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES AHMEDMUS000 AHMED, MUSTAF M. 0004275 448 12 2006 2005 Male Inact. 01/01/85 448 448 W 09/07/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO YES YES W 10/31/2005 U1 Unknown NON ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES AHMEDNEE000 AHMED SAID, NEEL BUHAR 0095407 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 04/03/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO NO YES AHMEDNEE001 AHMED SAID, NEEL KAMAL I. 0100741 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 05/08/86 448 448 W 09/20/2005 D8 Chose to stay h Living with a boyfriend 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 10/27/2005 UI Unknown CAME TWO DAYS/ W/D AND 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES GRAD YR 2006: 5 ALI FAD001 ALI, FADUMO A. 0095304 448 12 2006 2005 Female Inact. 01/01/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 09/09/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES 8 GRAD YR 2006: 0 ANCUIOSB000 ANGUIANO, OSBALDO 0095460 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 07/14/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 12/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NON - ATTENDANCE 2ND CHAN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 03/09/2006 U1 Unknown drop out 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES ARELI,JUA000 ARELLANO, JUAN 0095163 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 04/13/88 448 448 W 12/09/2005 UI Unknown NON- ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES AWAD ABD001 AWAD, ABDI HAKIM 0. 0095309 448 12 2006 2005 Male Inact. 01/01/87 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SALT LAKE CITY UTAH 17406 R 100 0 0 0 •448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES HENNETY0000 BENNETT, TYQUENCIA A. 0100891 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 04/19/88 448 448 W 02/06/2006 TO Transfer - Confir RETURNED TO MT RAINIER 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES PAGE: 1 letewh25.P t 03.06.01.0- 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 'NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT BLANCDEN000 BLANCHETTE, DENESHA P. 0004046 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 05/27/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO NO YES BOCCADAN000 BOCCALINI, DANIELE 0100732 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 02/05/89 448 448 W 01/20/2006 TO Transfer - Confir went back to Italy 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES CARTETAN000 CARTER, TANISHA J. 0101106 448 12 2006 2007 Female Inact. 09/07/87 448 448 W 01/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir RETURNED TO TODD BEAMER 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES CORNECHE000 CORNETT, CHELSEA L. 0015109 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 07/05/88 448 448 W 02/16/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Ephrata H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES CORONSAM000 CORONADO, SAMUEL 0. 0100890 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/18/87 448 448 W 11/02/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES DHOBLHIB000 DHOBLE, HIBO H. 0095447 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 01/01/86 448 448 W 09/29/2005 UI Unknown NON ATTENDANCE/ No Show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES D ISMUKYL000 DISMUKE, KYLE D. 0095319 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/17/88 448 448 W 12/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KIONA BENTON H.S. IN BE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES DRYDEJES000 DRYDEN, JESSICA M. 0001884 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 12/04/87 448 448 W 10/25/2005 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES FABERJAS000 FABER, JASON 0090022 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 04/15/88 448 448 W 05/19/2006 Ul Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES FARAHABD006 FARAH, ABDULAHI Y. 0100380 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 01/01/88 448 448 W 11/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SKYWARD 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES F1LLMMIC000 FILLMORE, MICHAEL J. 0050388 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/04/88 448 448 W 12/14/2005 TO Transfer - Confir CAREER LINKS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES 8 GRAD YR 2006: 14 FRANKANT000 FRANKLIN, ANTHONY M. 1110 09/05/2005 RET Retained 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 10/04/2005 D7 In training /wor At Vitals re -enter at t 17406 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES 0095149 448 12 2006 2005 Male Inact. 01/18/87 448 448 17406 R 40 0 0 0 YES YES R 40 0 0 0 Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 2 lstewh25.p FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 1 03.06.01.0 - 010029 ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PAGE: 3 STUDENT KEY NAME — ID NMI DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 1111 DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 16T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GL,ENNL,EO000 GLENN, LEONDIS L. 0011829 448 12 2006 2006 Male lnact. 01/24/88 448 448 W 10/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Job Jorp 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES GUL£DFAD000 GULED, FADUMA A. 0095354 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 12/01/88 448 448 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KENTLAKE H.S. KENT, WA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES 4 GRAD YR 2006: 2 GULEDFAR000 GULED, FARDOWSA A. 0095355 448 12 2006 2005 Female Inact. 12/01/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KENTLAKE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 0 GULEDFAR001 GULED, FARHIO A. 0095369 448 12 2006 2005 Female Inact. 12/07/85 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KENTLAKE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES II, EJAM000 HARPEL, JAMES B. 0095428 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/06/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir CLOVER PARK 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO NO YES HASSAHAS001 HASSAN, HASSAN O. 0095169 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 07/10/87 448 448 W 02/22/2006 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES HASSASOP000 HASSAN, SOPHIA A. 0100378 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 05/24/88 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PARK VIEW H.S. STERLING 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES HEACOMIC000 HEACOCK, MICHAEL R. 0075321 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 08/07/88 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES HUNTIJAR000 HUNTINGTON, JARED D. 0009794 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 08/21/87 448 448 W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES HUSSEFEY001 HUSSEIN, FEYNUS A. 0101030 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 02/25/88 448 448 W 12/14/2005 UI Unknown non - attendance 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES ACHA000 INGRAM, CHARLES D. 0095284 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 08/22/87 448 448 11/16/2005 DO Other JAIL 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES letewh25.p 03.06.01.0-010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AN ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT JAYMEMYL000 JAYME, MYLES F. 0100827 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/11/88 448 448 W 11/15/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf PER PHONE CALL FROM MOM 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES KETO BET000 KETO, BETO T. 0095468 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 11/24/86 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir COMM COLLEGE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES KONGAOSA000 KONGATKA, OSAIASI V. 0095305 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 12/15/87 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN HS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES I,AROCKAT000 LAROCHE, KATIE R. 0100408 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 05/05/88 448 448 W 09/16/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES LICONAND000 LICONA, ANDREA B. W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir TODD BEAMER H.S. 17406 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir went to Vitals at OSC 17406 PUB 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES 0004370 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 01/26/88 R 100 0 0 R 100 0 0 I,UDINJER000 LUDINGTON, JEREMY A. 0100649 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 09/19/87 448 448 01/03/2006 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES MARTTPAB000 MARTINEZ, PABLO I. 0095320 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 04/04/86 448 448 W 04/05/2006 D4 School not for 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES MELNTJAM000 MELNIK, JAMES P. 0004033 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 09/25/87 448 448 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer - Confir YOUTHSOURCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES MOHAMAMI005 MOHAMUD, AMINA M. 0095337 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 01/01/88 448 448 W 10/04/2005 DO Other VITALS WILL RE -ENTER AT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 16 MOORECLA000 MOORE, CLARISSA S. 0003616 448 13 2006 2003 Female Inact. 03/06/85 448 448 0 0 448 448 W 09/19/2005 D2 4( +)Yrs -No Grad DID NOT COMPLETE NEC CL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2005 13 13 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 03/28/2006 GO Graduated SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 13 13 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 0 SAN000 MORA, SANDRA L. • 0095261 448 12 2006 2004 Female Inact. 09/03/85 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 4 latewh25.9 03.06.01.0- 010029 ' W 02/22/2006 U1 Unknown NON- ATTENDANCE 17406 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PAGE: 5 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT YES R 100 0 0 0 MUNNSJOH000 MUNNS, JOHN B. 0001889 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 02/01/88 448 448 W 09/29/2005 U1 Unknown PER GWEN ESTES 17406 COM R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES NGUYEJUL000 NGUYEN, JULIE K. 0050123 448 12 2006 2005 Female Inact. 12/18/86 448 448 W 09/05/2005 SC Status Change 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 01/30/2006 U3 Transfer- Unconf quit attending running 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES NGUYETRA000 NGUYEN, TRANG V. 0004306 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 06/10/88 448 448 W 09/22/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Seattle Schools 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES OMER ZAM000 OMER, ZAMZAM A. 0004383 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 03/03/88 448 448 W 02/07/2006 DO Other JOB CORP 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES PENA CHR000 PENA, CHRISTINA 0101087 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 12/26/87 448 448 W 12/14/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVING BACK TO TEXAS WA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 110 148 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES PERCYAL.I000 PERCY, ALISHA L. 0095358 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 03/13/88 448 448 W 09/22/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WEST BLACK HILLS H. S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES PRAM NG0000 PRAM, NGOC T. 0009934 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 07/15/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir RIVERSIDE HS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO NO YES QUIROMAR000 QUIROS CAMBRONERO, MARIEL 0095465 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 09/19/86 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 8 REYESCAR000 REYES CRUZ, CARLOS 0004344 448 12 2006 2005 Male Inact. 02/12/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 12/02/2005 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES RUSCOJOY000 RUSCOE, JOYCE S. 0004437 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 06/25/88 448 448 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir South Seattle C.C. 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 1 S . - MAH000 SAID, MAHAMED O. 0004256 448 12 2006 2005 Male Inact. 01/01/86 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO YES YES letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT VAZQUBER000 VAZQUEZ, BERENICE L. W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 448 448 448 2006 2005 12 NO it GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Bellevue/ Robinswood H. 17406 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT :NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL, DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS W 04/15/2006 GO Graduated HAS ENF CREDITS TO GRAD 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 '448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES SALADNUR000 SALAD, NUR A. 0095413 448 12 2006 2006 Male lnact. 02/05/88 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WENT TO RENTON H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES W 04/17/2006 D7 In training /wor WILL RETURN 9/06 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES SALEHAMA000 SALEH, AMAL M. 0004335 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 12/31/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES STINSSUS000 STINSON, SUSAN J. 0100004 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 05/20/88 448 448 W 10/13/2005 UI Unknown NON ATTENDANCE 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES TANG T1E000 TANG, TIEN 0004336 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 04/22/88 448 448 W 12/09/2005 Cl Completer - GED 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES '1'SUN WON000 'TUN TAT, WONG 0100780 448 12 2006 2006 Male lnact. 01/17/88 448 448 W 10/12/2005 TO Transfer- Confir Exchange student from H 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 1110 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES TUIONJOH000 TUIONO, JOHN 0095146 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 05/14/88 448 448 W 09/27/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Southwest Education Cen 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 6 VASQUMAR001 VASQUEZ, MARTHA A. 0007393 448 12 2006 2002 Female Inact. 10/23/84 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2005 12 NO NO YES 8 GRAD YR 2005: 1 W 02/03/2006 GO Graduated SHE EARNED CRE TO GRA 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 0 448 448 0 0 0004194 448 12 2006 2005 Female Inact. 06/09/87 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 YES YES R 100 0 0 0 WA1dAJEA000 WALLACE, JEANIE L. 0011725 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 06/12/88 448 448 W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES SLAM000 WATTS, LAMONTEA 111/1 0100847 448 12 2006 2006 Male Inact. 06/17/88 448 448 W 01/03/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf enrolling in home schoo 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 6 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 AWAD ABD000 AWAD, ABDI SAMAD 0. W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir UTAH 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 4110, DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 'NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GE GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT WATTSLAT000 WATTS, LATAYJA A. 0100846 448 12 2006 2006 Female Inact. 06/17/88 448 448 W 09/14/2005 TO Transfer-Confir WENT OVER TO KENT MERID 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 12 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 3 ANDERLEI000 ANDERSON, LEIA S. 0075066 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 04/13/89 448 448 W 03/13/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Kent Meridan 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES AREVAMAR002 AREVALOS MARTINEZ, MARIA T 0101154 448 11. 2007 2005 Female Inact. 04/15/87 448 448 W 02/22/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES 0095308 448 11 2007 2006 Male Inact. 01/01/89 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES 1 BARQUET, ROBERTA L. 0050202 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 10/07/88 448 448 W 12/02/2005 UI Unknown NON- ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES BEARDBRA000 BEARD, BRANDEE D. 0075015 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 05/09/89 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TACOMA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 1111 148 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES BROWNNOR000 BROWN, NORMAN V. 0095366 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 01/18/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 'I'0 Transfer - Confir SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2007 11 NO NO YES CARNESAM000 CARNERO, SAMUEL L. 0095258 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. OS/14/88 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer- Confir NO SHOW 17406 COM R 100 0 448 448 448 2005 2007 11 NO NO YES 0 448 448 CHRISDAR001 CHRISTOPHER, DARRELL J. 0016563 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 03/23/88 448 448 W 01/26/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES DANGEDAN000 DANGER, DANIEL 0100782 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 11/02/88 448 448 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir host family is placed n 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES FEULITIF000 FEULING, TIFFANY A. 0101021 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 04/10/89 448 448 W 01/17/2006 UI Unknown non - attendance 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES FISHEMIR000 FISHER, MIRANDA R. 0075042 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 11/06/88 448 448 W 01/12/2006 Ul Unknown non - attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES • CBEN000 FLETCHER, BENNY L. 0095244 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 08/19/88 448 448 W 03/10/2006 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN H.S. IN HIGHL 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES PAGE: 7 letewh25.p 03.06.01.b- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST8 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS • ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT FLETCEDW000 FLETCHER, EDWARD J. 0095245 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 08/19/88 448 448 W 03/27/2006 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES HASSAMAS000 HASSAN, MASNO M. 0101031 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 01/01/89 448 448 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer- Confir SEATTLE BOS.requested f 17406 PUB 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL YES R 100 0 0 0 HORTOANT000 HORTON, ANTWON D. 0101204 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 07/24/88 448 448 W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES JIMENLES000 JIMENEZ, LESLIE 0101029 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 08/20/88 448 448 W 11/02/2005 Cl Completer - GED ONLEY HERE THREE DAYS 17406 PUB R 40 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES KAUR RAJ000 KAUR, RAJWANT 0100878 W 01/02/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf MOVED TO KENT 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 03/12/88 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 NO YES KIMBRSHA000 KIMBRELL, SHALOM R. 0101066 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 03/02/89 448 448 W 12/08/2005 U1 Unknown non - attendance 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES . ALA000 LEADER, ALANA K. 0075740 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 07/22/89 448 448 W 04/03/2006 U1 Unknown NON- ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES LEWISMAL000 LEWIS, MALCOLM X. 0095365 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 02/27/89 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES LICONPAO000 LICONA, PAOLA B. 0004369 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 12/25/88 448 448 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir TODD REAMER H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Went to Vitals at OSC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES MARTIBEN001 MARTINES, BENITA 0095300 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 02/19/90 448 448 W 11/18/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf MOVED TO YAKIMA / HAVE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES MESSMASH000 MESSMER, ASHLEY L. 0075031 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 08/10/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir kent meridian h.s. 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2007 11 NO NO YES MILLESAR000 MILLER, SARAH MARIE R. 0095398 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 11/22/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SENTINEL HS MISSOULA, 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES MOFfAN8�1OH001 MOHAMED, MOHAMOUD S. 0004394 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 10/22/88 448 448 W 09/22/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Tyee 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 8 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR iI' DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT 3NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS MOIMOSAL000 MOIMOI, SALOTE 0095104 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 03/08/88 W 12/02/2005 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 COM R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2006 11 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2006: 1 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir RAINIER BEACH 17406 COM R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES NAMROFER000 NAMBO, FERNANDO G. 0090058 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 11/07/88 W 12/02/2005 UI Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES W 05/15/2006 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 R 100 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES 448 448 0 0 448 448 0 0 NOM VAN000 NOM, VANNARA 0095436 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 07/30/88 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir RIVER RIDGE H.S. LACEY, 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES NUR MOH000 NUR, MOHAMED A. 0100689 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 01/01/88 448 448 W 05/08/2006 D7 In training /wor WORKING - SAYS HE'LL RT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES ODZAKMEL000 ODZAKOVIC, MELIHA 0016092 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 11/26/88 448 448 • 09/19/2005 UI Unknown Run -a -way 17406 R 100 0 0 0 48 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES OMAR SAL000 OMAR, SALMAN T. 0090027 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 01/01/89 448 448 W 10/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SKYWAY ALTERN. IN SEATT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES PEREZALE000 PEREZ, ALEJANDRA 0004030 448 11 2007 2006 Female Inact. 02/16/88 448 448 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer- Confir IN CALIF 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES REDMOMAR000 REDMOND HOWIE, MARQUICHESH 0095296 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 12/19/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 SC Status Change running start full time 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES W 01/25/2006 SC Status Change running start part time 17406 R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES W 04/04/2006 TO Transfer- Confir SEATTLE/ INDIAN CENTER 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11. NO NO YES RII.EYMIC001 RILEY, MICHAEL 0095256 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 11/22/88 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SEATTLE SCHOOL CREDIT R 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES RODRIFAB000 RODRIGUEZ, FABIAN 0100829 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 04/03/88 448 448 W 12/14/2005 U1 Unknown NON - ATTENDANCE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 40 48 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES 03/03/2006 D7 In training /wor WORKING 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 9 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SANDONIC000 SANDOVAL, NICHOLAS A. 0090097 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 07/18/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir ROXTON INDEPENDENT SCH 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES SEBESVER000 SEBESTOVA, VERONIKA 0095346 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 12/28/88 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2007 11 NO NO YES SEDERTIN000 SEDERLIN, TINISHA K. 0015464 448 1.1 2007 2007 Female Inact. 04/11/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer- Confir Highline School Distric 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES SELLEHES000 SELLERS, HESTANNA L. 0095470 448 11 2007 2005 Female Inact. 10/21/86 448 448 W 12/16/2005 U1 Unknown Non - Attendance 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES SHAUGELI000 SHAUGHNESSY, ELIZABETH M. 0011908 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 05/06/89 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PUYALLUP H S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2007: 14 SHAW ULY000 SHAW, ULYSSES D. 0100385 448 11 2007 2006 Male Inact. 02/20/87 448 448 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 111 048 448 448 2005 2006 11 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2006: 1 W 09/16/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES SHELLBRA000 SHELLY, BRANDON T. 0100750 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 12/05/88 448 448 W 10/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to tacoma 17406 PUB R 0 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES THOMPNAJ000 THOMPSON, NAJEE J. 0100817 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 04/05/89 448 448 W 10/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir transfered to Renton H. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES TORRF,CTN000 TORRES, CINDY C. 0100662 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 01/12/89 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Georgia 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES TROUCJEN000 TROUTMAN, JENNIFER L. 0050914 448 11 2007 2007 Female lnact. 08/05/89 448 448 W 09/26/2005 TO Transfer- Confir transfered to Kent Meri 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES TURNEEVA000 TURNER, EVAN P. 0090034 448 11 2007 2007 Male Enact. 11/25/88 448 448 W 10/21/2005 Ul Unknown 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES : ' FLO000 UTU, FLORENCE K. 0090055 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 01/03/89 448 448 01/03/2006 Ul Unknown non - attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES PAGE: 10 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.6- 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS IIII1 SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT WAGNEVAN000 WAGNER, VANESSA M. 0101011 448 11 2007 2007 Female Inact. 08/16/89 448 448 W 11/04/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf w/d due to absences 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES WALKEPAT000 WALKER, PATRICK L. 0090025 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 08/16/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir LOUSING HS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES YEMRUBIN000 YEMRU, BINYAM B. 0095338 448 11 2007 2007 Male Inact. 12/24/88 448 448 W 05/08/2006 TO Transfer - Confir ODYSSEY HS - TYEE CAMPU 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2007 11 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2007: 9 ABDULFAT000 ABDULLE, FATUMA A. 0100404 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 01/01/90 448 448 W 03/07/2006 TO Transfer-Confir MOUNTAINVIEW H.S. IN AU 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES AHMEDRAH000 AHMED SAID, RAHEI, 0095408 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/09/90 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2008 10 NO NO YES ANDESCAS000 ANDES, CASSANDRA J. 0095410 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 05/17/90 448 448 W OS/19/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf mom will request record 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 1111,48 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES ARONILBR000 ARONI, IBRAHIM S. 0090330 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/01/90 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir per D. Aguiliz 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES AWAD FAD000 AWAD, FADUMO 0. 0090334 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 01/01/90 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer-Confir UTAH 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES 11ARBF.WHI000 BARBER, WHITNEY M. 0090318 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 11/04/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf moving to Florida 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES BURRUFRA000 BURRUEL, FRANCISCO J. 0100886 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 02/24/90 448 448 W 12/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir San Luis High School/ A 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES HUSBEA:,L000 BUSBEY, ALLEN A. 0095322 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 07/11/89 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir home school 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES BUTLETYL000 BUTLER, TYLER A. 0101076 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/09/90 448 448 W 01/05/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf moving to Arizona 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES I SHE000 CAMPBELL, SHEENA C. 0095474 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 08/01/90 448 448 03/20/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf DAD CALLED / SHE IS MOV 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PAGE: 11 letewh25 03.06.01.0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06 /01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 1111 DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 6T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT CANDEAND000 CANDELARIO, ANDRES W 02/08/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO COBOSALA000 COBOS, ALAN W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO 0101108 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 12/13/89 448 448 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 NO YES 0095467 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 07/21/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES CROSSLES000 CROSS, LESTER C. 0090080 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 05/07/90 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PHOENIX UNION HS DIST 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES DAZA JUL000 DAZA, JULIO A. 0090151 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 11/12/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other moved back to Mexico 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES DIJBUQKAY000 DUBUQUE, KAYLA M. 0090153 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 01/15/90 448 448 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer-Confir EVERGREEN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES ELI,EFBRE000 ELLEFSON, BRETT W. W 05/05/2006 D1 Expl /Sus -No ret LTS - CAN RETURN 06/07 17406 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES 0090244 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/27/90 448 448 R 100 0 0 0 FLUKO00 ELLEFSON, LUKE J. 0090245 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/27/90 448 448 W 05/05/2006 D1 Expl /Sus -No ret LTS REMAINDER OF 05/06 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES FARRELEV000 FARRELL, LEVI J. 0075505 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 04/06/89 448 448 W 02/16/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Home school 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES GAX1OHFC000 GAXJOLA, HECTOR A. 0095471 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/26/89 448 448 W 11/23/2005 TO Transfer-Confir AUBURN SENIOR H. S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES GIBSOBRY000 GIBSON, BRYNDI C. 0095419 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 03/23/90 448 448 W 10/20/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf non - attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES GLOVEJOH000 GLOVER, JOHNNIE 0100403 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 08/03/90 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NEW FRONTIERS IN SILVER 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2008 10 NO NO YES GONZADAV002 GONZALEZ, DAVID 0015881 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/15/90 448 448 W 09/28/2005 UI Unknown no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES C R MIC000 GUERRERO, MICHAEL M. 0095375 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/11/90 448 448 12/09/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moving to Sipan 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PAGE: 12 latewh25.p 03. 06.01.0- 010029 POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAI, SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GULLIRAN000 GULLIKSON, RANDILYNN 0100959 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 10/30/89 448 448 W 10/12/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Minnesota 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES HASSAHIB000 HASSAN, HIBO A. 0095450 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 01/08/90 448 448 W 09/29/2005 UI Unknown NON ATTENDANCE/ No Show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES HASSAMOH002 HASSAN, MOHAMUD A. 0090204 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/01/90 448 448 W 09/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir went to Renton H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES HURTARIC000 HURTADO, RICHARD 0100840 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 03/03/90 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir moved to federal way 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES IBRAHWAR000 IBRAHIM, WARDA A. 0050795 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 07/01/90 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2008 10 NO NO YES JOHNSROD000 JOHNSON, RODGER F. 0009983 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 10/23/89 448 448 W 03/27/2006 TO Transfer - Confir South Seattle High Comp 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES 1110 KATCHEECH, CODY 0101004 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 10/02/89 448 448 W 12/14/2005 UI Unknown non - attendance 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES KONGAPEN000 KONGAIKA, PEN1SIMANI P. 0090324 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 04/21/90 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN HS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES LANDAMAR000 LANDA, MARCOS A. 0016717 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 02/02/90 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir THOMAS JEFFERSON FEDER 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MAIDATER000 MAIDA, TERESITA G. 0090098 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 04/27/90 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir CHIEF SEALTH 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MATHESUN000 MATHEW, SUNITHA K. 0075342 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 02/23/90 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Bellevue H.S. request 9 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MCDANJOS000 MCDANIELS, JOSEPH A. 0101088 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 04/11/89 448 448 W 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES . NSAN000 MELENDEZ, JR, SANTIAGO H. 0015869 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 08/22/89 448 448 11/17/2005 U1 Unknown non - attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PAGE: 13 latewh25.p 03.06.01.'0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS • ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT MILLEKAT000 MILLER, KATHLEEN J. 0095399 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 11/12/89 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MKRTUVAL000 MKRTUMYAN, VALENTINA K. 0050818 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 07/09/89 448 448 W 02/28/2006 TO Transfer - Confir BELLEVUE HIGH SCHOOL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MOHAMFAR002 MOHAMED, FARDOSA S. 0004395 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 12/29/89 448 448 W 02/13/2006 D1 Expl /Sus -No ret LTS for threat to kill 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES MURPHDAR000 MURPHY, DARRAY 0100848 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 09/03/90 448 448 W 01/03/2006 TO Transfer-Confir KENT MERIDIAN H.S. IN K 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PENA RAU000 PENA, RAUL 0090007 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 03/10/90 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES W 03/09/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf moving to Thomas Jeffer 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PIO JOA000 PIO, JOANA I. 0090202 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 03/09/90 448 448 11104 09/27/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NO SHOW/ Federal Way ca 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES PI,FASDON000 PLEASANT, DONALD 0075941 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 11/26/89 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer.Confir LUGUNA CREEK HIGH 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES RASOOFAI000 RASOOL, FAIZ 0100935 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 01/06/90 448 448 W 10/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved back to New Orlea 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES ROJASCRY000 ROJAS, CRYSTAL 0095477 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 04/04/89 448 448 W 02/10/2006 U3 Transfer•Unconf 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES SCOTTSAM000 SCOTT, SAMANTHA M. 0095393 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 10/17/89 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer- Confir EVERGREEN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES SERVIJOS001 SERVIN, JOSE L. 0100412 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 11/17/87 448 448 W 01/06/2006 D7 In training /wor 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES STACORAM000 STACONA, RAMONA M. 0090162 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 03/02/90 448 448 W 11/14/2005 TO Transfer- Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES TA LI LALA000 TAU1LIILl, ALAURA C. 0090284 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 03/16/90 448 448 W 09/05/2005 DO Other OUT OF DISTR W/D NON AT 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2005 2008 10 NO NO YES PAGE: 14 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT - ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DISTf DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS TREJOFRA000 TREJO, FRANCISCO T. 0009977 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 06/13/89 448 448 W 11/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Great Falls 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES UHILABRI000 UHILA, BRITNEY C. 0100430 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 02/16/90 448 448 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Piner H.S. Santa Rosa, 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES VENEGERE001 VENEGAS, ERENDIRA B. 0004441 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 07/19/89 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES VONG AND000 VONG, ANDY 0015695 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 09/29/89 448 448 W 04/04/2006 TO Transfer Confir INTERLAKE/ 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES WASHISHA000 WASHINGTON, SHAUN A. 0015105 448 10 2008 2008 Male Inact. 08/21/89 448 448 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir enrolled in New Start a 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES WET7,LKAL000 WETZLER, KALA L. 0075121 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 10/01/89 448 448 W 09/05/2005 TO Transfer- Confir VASHON HS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES EREB000 WHITE, REBEKAH P. 0090196 448 10 2008 2008 Female Inact. 08/24/89 448 448 W 01/06/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf moved to Seattle 17406 COW R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2008 10 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2008: 56 ABRAHLEN000 ABRAHAM, LENE 0090465 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 02/22/91 448 448 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir FED WAY H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ARELLMAR000 ARELLANO, MARIA 0090172 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 10/18/90 448 448 W 09/19/2005 TO Transfer- Confir Rialto High School Cali 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ATANABOR000 ATANASOVA, BORYANA A. 0090321 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 09/12/91 448 448 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir went to Renton High Sch 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES AV1LARAQ000 AV11.,A, RAQUEL M. 0090395 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 12/07/90 448 448 W 10/18/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Calif. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES AWAD AHD002 AWAD, ABDINAS1R 0. 0090335 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/01/91 448 448 W 11/23/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf ABSENCES 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES •.BRI000 BARNES, BRIAWNA C. 0101037 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 04/14/91 448 448 W 12/16/2008 U3 Transfer - Unconf Moved to Tacoma 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PAGE: 15 letewh25.p 03.06.01.'0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TY DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS • ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT BELLOER1001 BELLO, ERICK DAVID 0100653 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 04/26/91 448 448 W 12/16/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf moved to california 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES BEYENSAR000 BEYENE, SARA F. 0051560 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/20/91 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir CHRISTIAN FAITH SCHOOL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES HOTRoJAM001 BOTROS, JAMES T. 0051588 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 07/14/91 448 448 W 09/16/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES BOTTGJES000 BOTTGER, JESSICA 0100786 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 10/23/90 448 448 W 01/04/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Chimacum 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES CARPKTER000 CARPENTER, TERRENCE J. 0090365 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 04/14/91 448 448 W 02/08/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES CLARKMIC000 CLARK, MICHAEL L. 0090231 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 06/20/91 448 448 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Chief Sealth H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES • ALE000 CORD, ALEXANDER M. 0050306 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 02/09/91 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KENNEDY HS per teacher' 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES CROY RAN000 CROY, RANAE Y. 0015636 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 01/17/91 448 448 W 02/27/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WINSTON CHURCHILL H.S./ 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES DAD HUY000 DAO, HUY G. 0015541 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 12/22/90 448 448 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOUNT RAINIER H S IN DE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES DAVISJAM000 DAVIS, JAMAL L. 0075923 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/17/91 448 448 W 05/11/2006 D1 Expl /Sus -No ret LTS UNTIL 06/07 SCHOOL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES DECKENIC000 DECKER, NICOLE L. 0075259 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 11/09/90 448 448 W 05/04/2006 TO Transfer - Confir HOME SCHOOLING INSTEAD 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES DEMOWELI000 DEMOWEZ, ELIZABETH 0050342 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 07/05/90 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES GONZAANA000 GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, ANABEL 0090428 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 01/13/91 448 448 TO Transfer- Confir to Burien/ Evergreen 17406 R 100 •32/06/2005 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 16 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GRIFFTYR000 GRIFFITH, TYRA C. 0050613 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 12/10/90 448 448 W 12/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir AUBURN RIVERSIDE H.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES GUAN JOV000 GUAN, JOVY J. 0090185 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 03/14/91 448 448 W 01/1.7/2006 TO Transfer - Confir non- attendance - unable 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES W 04/06/2006 TO Transfer - Confir KENT - MERIDIAN HIGH SCHO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES HERROTYL000 HERRON, TYLER R. 0090327 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 05/10/91 448 448 W 11/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir SPANAWAY S.H. IN TACOMA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES HUSSEMOH000 HUSSEIN, MOHAMED A. 0090092 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/01/91 448 448 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir ATTENDING SEATLLE SCHOO 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ,:AMERHEN000 JAMERSON, HENRY M. 0050813 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/28/91 448 448 W 03/27/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Kentwood 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES JOHNSBRI000 JOHNSON, BRITTANIE 0100399 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 09/20/90 448 448 11 /21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO CALIF. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 • 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES KATCHKIA001 KATCHEECH WILLIAMS, KIARA 0101002 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 01/04/91 448 448 W 04/25/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Tyee 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES KAUR GUR003 KAUR, GURSHARN 0100650 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 02/27/91 448 448 W 01/02/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf MOVED TO KENT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES KORCZBR1000 KORCZAK, BRITTANY A. W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer- Confir LINDBERGH H.S. IN RENTO 17406 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES 0090292 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 03/14/91 448 448 R 100 0 0 0 I,AULURUT000 LAULU, RUTA M. 0090045 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 11/07/91 448 448 W 01/04/2006 TO Transfer - Confir MAR VISTA H.S. IMPERIAL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES LEFFAASH000 LEFFALL, ASHTON 0090387 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 02/12/91 448 448 W 09/23/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES MCCOMCOU000 MCCOMB BUEHLER, COULTON G. 0100377 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 11/11/90 448 448 W 10/04/2005 TO Transfer - Confir request from Highline H 17406 R 100 0 0 0 ...448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES MKRTUVLA000 MKRTUMYAN, VLADIMIR K. 0050819 W 02/28/2006 TO Transfer - Confir BELLEVUE HIGH SCHOOL 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 03/06/91 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 17 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT MUGAZMUG000 MUGAZA, MUGAZA A. 0090413 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/01/91 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Mt. View/ Auburn 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES MUSTOCEC000 MUSTONEN, CECILIA M. 0090476 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 01/18/91 448 448 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir went to Mt. Ranier in H 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES W 01/18/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Washington H.S. Tacoma 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES NCUYEKIM000 NGUYEN, KIMGENE H. 0050909 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 07/24/91 448 448 W 09/15/2005 TO Transfer - Confir GLOBAL CONNECTIONS IN S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ORTIZROB001 ORTIZ, ROBERTA L. 0051033 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/28/90 448 448 W 05/05/2006 TO Transfer - Confir EVERGREEN H.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PARENKRI000 PARENT, KRISTIN M. 0090393 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 05/04/91 448 448 W 10/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Highline H.S. 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PARRAMAR000 PARRA CETINA, MARIO J. 0090254 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 08/16/90 448 448 11104 09/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir ODYSSEY /TYEE H.S. IN S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PATTOCHA000 PATTON, CHAVONNE L. 0090433 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 02/20/91. 448 448 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir w/d due to absences/ IN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PEARSJES000 PEARSON, JESSICA M. 0100681 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 05/03/91 448 448 W 12/16/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf waiting for request to 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES PHILLMAR002 PHILLIPS, MARQUISHA S. 0090108 264 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/21/91 264 264 W 09/29/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO NO PICKED V000 PICKETT, D VONNE A. 0090384 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 12/10/90 448 448 W 09/28/2005 Ul Unknown no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES QUINTDAN000 QUINTERO, DANIEL A. 0015774 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 02/12/91 448 448 W 05/11/2006 TO Transfer- Confir moved to Panama 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES RAMOSAND000 RAMOS, ANDRY A. 0101208 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 11/15/90 448 448 W 03/15/2006 D1 Expl /Sus -No ret EXPULSION 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 .448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES RASMUNIC000 RASMUSSEN, NICHOLAS A. 0090421 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir EVERETT HIGH SCHOOL 448 448 448 2005 2009 09 NO NO 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 12/26/90 448 448 17406 R 100 0 0 0 YES PAGE: 18 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 RIVERCRY000 RIVERA, CRYSTAL J. POSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:20 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIET# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT RAZA ALI000 RAZA, ALI 0100986 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 10/28/89 448 448 W 12/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir BELLEVUE, WA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES REM LYN000 REM, LYNNIE 0090467 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 11/27/90 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer- Confir moved to California 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES RIO BRI000 RIO, BRITTANY J. 0015558 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 10/19/90 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Mt. Rainier H.S. Highli 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES 0100839 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 05/06/91 448 448 W 01/26/2006 TO Transfer - Confir highline district 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ROBERSAY000 ROBERTS, SAYBAH 0090353 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/01/91 448 448 W 01/05/2006 TO Transfer - Confir Champlin Park H.S. in C 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES ROWI.,EBAR000 ROWLEY, BART A. 0015867 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 12/26/90 448 448 W 11/18/2005 D1 Expl /Sus-No ret Expulsion for spraying 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES IIII1 03/28/2006 DO Other NON ATTENDANCE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES SACHANIT000 SACHAR, NITISH 0100843 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 03/17/91 448 448 W 01/12/2006 TO Transfer-Confir moved to Calif 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES SAJJASID000 SAJJAD, SIDHRA 0100987 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 12/28/91 448 448 W 10/25/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf CAME FROM KATRINA/ LEFT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES SANCIIJOH001 SANCHEZ, JOHNATHON E. 0075495 264 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 11/11/90 264 264 W 09/23/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf Mother withdrew per Mov 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO NO SCHRATRI000 SCHRAMM, TRISCHA L. 0090362 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/27/90 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir RECORDS REQUEST FROM BA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES SEGUIJES000 SEGUIN, JESSICA L. W 09/29/2005 U1 Unknown NON ATTENDANCE/ No Show 17406 PUB 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES W 02/23/2006 TO Transfer - Confir MOVING BACK WITH PARENT 17406 PUB 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES S GSAM000 SHAUGHNESSY, SAMMANTHA L. 0075278 09/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PUYALLUP 448 448 448 2005 2009 09 NO W 09/14/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PUYALLUP H.S. 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO 0100673 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 06/17/91 R 100 0 0 R 100 0 0 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 02/20/91 17406 COM R 100 0 0 NO YES 17406 COM R 100 0 0 NO YES 448 448 0 0 448 448 0 0 PAGE: 19 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 FOSTER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Time: 8:20 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR OFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 110 DATE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SP E LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SOEUNRIT000 SOEUNG, RITHY 0090406 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 02/13/90 448 448 W 09/29/2005 U1 Unknown NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES STANDVER000 STANOTFER, VERNON D. 0016770 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 03/29/91. 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir REQUEST FROM KENT MERID 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES 'I'AVITFAA000 TAVITA, FAALELEI 0090453 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 07/29/91 448 448 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir DECATOR IN FEDERAL WAY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES THOMASHA000 THOMAS, SHAKARA S. 0100868 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 06/28/91 448 448 W 11/17/2005 U3 Transfer - Unconf w/d due to absences 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES 'I'ORREMAR002 TORRES, MARIBEL B. 0051391 448 09 2009 2009 Female Inact. 08/26/90 448 448 W 09/16/2005 TO Transfer- Confir Highline Dist. requeste 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES VALAVTAU000 VALAVALA, TAUPULE A. 0051418 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/01/91 448 448 W 12/14/2005 U1 Unknown non - attendance 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES III/ 02/09/2006 TO Transfer - Confir moving to Hawaii 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES VONG TOM000 VONG, TOMMY 0015694 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 05/07/91 448 448 W 04/03/2006 U3 Transfer - Unconf Interlake School in Bel 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES WADSWJOS000 WADSWORTH, JOSHUA S. 0015562 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 03/28/91 448 448 W 09/16/2005 Ul Unknown NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES WFLIYSAL000 WELIYO, SALAH J. 0090368 448 09 2009 2009 Male Inact. 01/01/91 448 448 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer - Confir kent 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES WESLEPAR000 WESLEY, PARRIS A. 0100993 448 09 2009 2009 Male inact. 07/07/90 448 448 W 12/14/2005 Ul Unknown non - attendance 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES XIONGTON000 XIONG, TONY 0100832 448 09 2009 2010 Male Inact. 09/25/91 448 448 W 09/09/2005 SC Status Change 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES W 12/07/2005 TO Transfer - Confir BARTLETT H.S. IN ANCHOR 17406 R 100 0 0 0 448 448 448 2006 2009 09 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2009: 68 • Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 20 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 • )TAL E/W STUDENTS: 158 • • GRAD. YR 2010 2011 2012 TOTAL: End of report - -- -GRADE TOTALS - - -- GRADE MALE FEMALE 35 23 30 27 23 20 88 70 BOTH 58 57 43 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Ni` \IN Nsa\._k_, ,_:) ?\. cAjzI.Ki Nr■-E—:\Z.) \\N .-v\s„ \j\) Time: 8:34 AM 5% c c e PAGE: Date: 06/01/06 15 :tewh25.p !.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL ATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTS DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ABDIYGUL000 ABDIYEVA, GULBAKHOR 0101336 264 08 2010 Male Active E 05/12/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 264 264 264 2010 08 N/A AL) NAD000 AL1, NADIRA 0100738 264 08 2010 Female Active K 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM DIMMITT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A ARZATEDI000 ARZATE, EDITH 0101206 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 02/10/2006 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERED FROM CASCADE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 YES E 05/11/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A ASLANSAL000 ASLANOVA, SALVI S. 0101028 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A BAILEROB001 BAILEY, ROBERT C. 0090207 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CHINOOK 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A BARREFER000 BARRERA, FERNANDO 0100742 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 /06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM BOC IN SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 4 264 264 2010 N/A BAUTIJIK000 BAUTISTA, JIKIRI 0101218 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 02/16/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM MERCER MIDD 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A BECK TYL000 BECK. TYLOR 0101096 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 11/28/2005 ENT ENTRY MCNAIR MIDDLE DETROIT M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A BRAY NIC000 BRAY, NICOLE C. E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2010 7 ARAFCHA000 FARAFONTOFF, CHAD M. E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 2010 'ORSYALE000 FORSYTH, ALEC M. E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2010 0076081 From Chinook M.S. SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 264 264 0 264 264 0 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A CORTEALI000 CORTEZ, ALI 0100775 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from meany ms in settle 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A !IAVTDBAI000 DAVIDSON, BAILEY J. 0100622 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 K 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Chinook M.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 08 08 N/A 0015819 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0050536 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A PACE: 1 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME IOHNSGIL000 JOHNSON, GILBERT R. E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2010 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DA TE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GREENZAL000 GREEN, ZALE A. 0101211 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 12/16/2005 ENT ENTRY PREVIOUS SCHOOL KI..AMATH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A GULALKAM000 GULALIYER, KAMRAN 0101162 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 01/19/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT NEW TO THE COUN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A GULALSOF000 GULALIYEVA, SOFIA 0101161 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 01/19/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT JUST ARRIVED FR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A HAAG AHL000 HAAG, AHLICIA P. 0101173 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 01/30/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT TRANSFER FROM 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A HALL JAC000 HALL, JACOB D. 0100888 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/15/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SHOREWOOD CHRISTIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A HASSAHAM003 HASSAN, HAMDA 0100911 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/21/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CHINOOK MS. IN HIG 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A HA•E000 HAYNES, CHEYENNE P. 0090399 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY attended sms until feb/ 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 YES E 05/16/2006 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A JIMENDIA000 JIMENEZ, DIANA S. 0100757 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MEANY MIDDLE SCHOO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A 0051765 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A JOHNSLAM000 JOHNSON, LAMETRICX D. 0100904 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/19/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM PACIFIC MIDDLE SCH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A (IN SOK000 KIN, SOKLENG 0100579 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Sacajawea Middle S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A :LEINBR1000 KLEIN, BRITNEY J. 0090346 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 •261 264 2010 N/A ZWISMAJ000 LEWIS, MAJOK I. 0090390 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 F. 01/06/2006 ENT ENTRY PREVIOUS SHOWALTER STUD 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A PAGE: 2 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT LITTLASH000 LITTLE LIGHT, ASHLEY R. 0101145 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 01/09/2006 ENT ENTRY PREVIOUS SCHOOL:MIILCRE 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A LOMANKHA000 LOMANOV, KHASAN 0101303 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 04/19/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A LOMANKHU000 LOMANOV, KHUSEYN I. 0101275 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 03/31/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM MAYSK IN RU 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A LOPEZPED000 LOPEZ, PEDRO 0101219 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 02/16/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A LUI WAL000 LUI, WALLY 0090438 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 1 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MARTIOSC000 MARTINEZ VILLA, OSCAR A. 0101355 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 05/22/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:ROBINSWOOD M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MAAAN000 MARTINEZ, VANESSA 0017045 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MAS0NSHA000 MASON, SHANTEL 0090290 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/09/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MEANY MS IN SEATTL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MCDANJEM000 MCDANIELS, JEMIESHA B. 0101089 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 11/21/2005 ENT ENTRY RAINIER M.S. IN AUBURN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MELENMA0000 MELENDEZ, MAUREEN MAE C. 0100674 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM PHILLIPINES 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MOHAMBUR000 MOHAMED, BURHAN S. 0051438 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SYLVESTER MID SCH 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MONTEROB000 MONI'ERROSO, ROBERT A. 0090352 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from o'callagin ms. in 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A MU BS000 MUSSA, EBSITLL J. 0101299 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 /18/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: ETHIOPIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A PAGE: 3 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT NARANLOR000 NARANJO, LORENZA 0101337 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 05/15/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:PACIFIC M.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A PALOMANT000 PALOMO, ANTHONY TONI J. 0101295 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 04/17/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:DARDEN M.S. 17406 PUB 264 264 264 2010 N/A QUICHADR000 QUICHOCHO, ADRIAN S. 0101048 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 10/27/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SEQUOYAH MS. IN FE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A RAMIRYAJ000 RAMIREZ JAVAN, YAJAIRA 0101098 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 11/16/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM ESCUILA SECONDARIA 17406 PUB 264 264 264 2010 N/A RATSABEN000 RATSAMEE, BENSON 0100602 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Mercer Middle Scho 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A ROBOWABD000 ROBOW, ABDINASIR A. 0101049 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 10/27/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM BOC IN SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A Ro IP oROOO RODRIGUEZ, JORGE 0050920 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/26/2005 ENT ENTRY from pacific middle sch 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A SALADAHM000 SALAD, AHMED E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2010 SALZASIM000 SALZANO, SIMON 0101277 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 03/29/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:ENTERPRISE M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A SANTOJUL000 SANTOS, JULIA S. 0101320 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 05/09/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:WILSON ELEME 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A SAYTDSHA000 SAYTDI, SHAFT A 0100 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY eugene middle school 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A SMITHTAL000 SMITH, TALEAH R. 0101141 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 01/06/2006 ENT ENTRY PREVIOUS SCHOOL:DIMMIT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A ST T000 STEVENSON, ANTHONY J. /21/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2010 from chinook ms SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS 0100776 R 100 0 0 0 R 100 0 0 0 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090275 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A PAGE: 4 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL D ATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTU DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT STEWAHAI000 STEWART, HAILEE M. 0090400 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SMS - DID NOT ATTE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A SUN VAN000 SUN, VANSICA 0100663 264 08 2010 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Cascade Middle Sch 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A VO VI 000 VO, VI T. 0101041 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 10/26/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MADISON M.S. IN SE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A VU L00000 VU, LOC T. 0100777 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from asa mercer ms 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A WASUGAHM000 WASUGE, AHMED M. 0101077 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 11/14/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM DIMMITT IN RENTON 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A WINKLJAC000 WINKLER, JACOB N. 0100771 264 08 2010 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from meany ms in seattl 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2010 N/A GRAD YR 2010: 58 • PAGE: 5 stewh35.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:34 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY tEN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT AFOA KAL000 AFOA, KALANI M. 0100871 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/13/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM HILL TOP ELEMENTAR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A AUSTIJOE000 AUSTIN BARBER, JOE J. 0101026 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 10/20/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CASCADE M.S. IN BU 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A HATTUSHI000 BATTULGA, SHIKHER 0100625 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Prairie Middle Sch 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A HECKEJAR000 BECKER, JAREN M. 0101297 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 04/17/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:MCCORMIK JR. 17406 PUB R .100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A BENSOVER000 BENSON, VERONICA R. 0100785 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM BINSMEAD MS IN POR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A RES]CALM000 BESIC, ALMADIN 0016905 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 08/30/2005 ENT ENTRY District Entry Date - 0 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A BRREL000 BRDAREVIC, MF,LDINA 0051321 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A BROWNDE0000 BROWN, DEONTE T. 0101027 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 10/18/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM NELSON MIDDLE SCHO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A CAYTONEC000 CAYTON, NECOLE E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 FLO HE000 FLORES VARGAS, SHEYLA /06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 0051055 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 2011 N/A CENTEDAV000 CENTENO, DAVID A. 0100733 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY from las vegas 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A CHAKHTIM000 CHAKHALOV, TIMUR I. 0101023 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 10 /17/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A DAMIAKAT000 DAMIAN, KATHERINE E. 0101234 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 02/24/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM SAN FERNAND 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A 0100748 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 6 3tewh2.5.p SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL 3.06.01.0 - 010029 ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PAGE: 7 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 1110; CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTH DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GOODRMOR000 GOODRICH, MORGAN K. 0101310 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 05/02/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:NEA14 BAY M.S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A CULALELD000 CULALIVEV, ELDAR R. 0101045 264 07 2011 Male Active E 10/27/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A HANG JES000 HANG, JESSICA K. 0101279 264 07 2011 Female Active E 03/30/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:MEANY M.S. S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A HERNAIVA000 HERNANDEZ, IVAN P. E 11/16/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 HERNANAN000 HERNANDEZ, NANCY E 11/28/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 HUSSEZAK000 HUSSEIN, ZAKARIA A. E 03/06/2006 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 LAPP MIA000 KAPP, MIA G. F. 09/26/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 E 1N000 LE, VINH 16/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 0101086 264 07 2011 Male Active 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 N/A 0101095 264 07 2011 Female Active 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 N/A Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 264 264 0 264 264 0 264 264 0 264 264 0 HOLGUGRI000 HOLGUIN DELAROSA, GRISELDA 0017157 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY moved into district att 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A HUI,�CAV000 HULSIZER, GAVIN C. 0101198 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 F. 02/07/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT TRANSFER FROM C 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 2G4 264 2011 N/A 0076189 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 N/A ?DJOSMAR000 IDJOSKI, MARKO 0101290 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 04/17/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:VUK KARADZIC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A JIMENYOV000 JIMENEZ, YOVANI 0100755 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM WASHINGTON MIDDLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A 0100971 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 FROM SAGINAW, MI 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2011 N/A (LEINBRE000 KLEINER, BRETANY 0016888 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY NRES turned in paperwor 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A 0101121 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2011 N/A stewh35.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time 8:34 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL TE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST8 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT — LEFFAANI000 LEFFALL, ANISE M. 0090388 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 05/03/2006 ENT ENTRY RE- ENROLLED FROM ASA ME 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A hOPEZMAR004 LOPEZ SERVIN, MARTIN 0100576 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 F•_ 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Hill Top Elementar 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A I,OPEZMER000 LOPEZ, MERLIN A. 0016185 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY nres turned in paperwor 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A MEJICALE000 MEJICANOS, ALEJANDRA M. 0100594 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 F, 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Dimmitt M.S. in Re 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A MUHAM?1OH004 MOHAMED, MOHAMED S. 0051437 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A MONDRARA000 MONDRAGON, ARACELI 0051081 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 F. 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY SMS LAST YEAR 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A MULL�IRE000 MULLER, IRENE 0101176 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 12/16/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A MURPHRAC000 MURPHY, RACELIN J. 0100873 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/14/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM PLEASANT GLADE ELE 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A NEUMIJOR000 NEUMILLER, JORDAN J. 0100623 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Lincoln M.S Beach 17406 PUB R 300 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A NGUYEANN001 NGUYEN, ANNA 0100586 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Hamilton Middle Sc 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A OROZCIRI000 OROZCO, IRIS T. 0101262 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 03/10/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: WASHING M.S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A PALOMJOH000 PALOMO, JOHN T. 0101296 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 04/17/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: DARDEN M.S. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 26e 264 264 2011 N/A 'A R 000 PAPALADZE, NARIMAN B. 06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 from Russia 0100739 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 8 stewh05.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:34 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBA DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT PARKECOR000 PARKER, CORSICA A. 0076429 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY enrolled as homeless st 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A PRAKASID000 PRAKASH, SIDHARTH N. 0100480 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SUNNYDALE ELEM HIG 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A RHOADSEL000 RHOADS TOOTOO, SELINA 0100745 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM VALLEY VIEW 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A RIVASBRE000 RIVAS, BRENDA N. 0101034 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A RODRIAAR000 RODRIGUEZ, AARON J. 0100743 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SOUTHERN HEIGHTS - 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A RODRIF.DW000 RODRIGUEZ, EDWARD 0101285 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 04/05/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: FRANKLIN M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A ROA000 RODRIGUEZ, IVAN O. 0100581 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Pacific Middle Sch 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A ROGACJES000 ROGACKI, JESSICA 0100747 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM BOW LAKE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A NOUN RAD000 ROUN, RADHIYYA 0101178 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 12/16/2005 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERD FROM MERCER M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A SALADFAI000 SALAD, FAISO 0100774 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY from hilltop elementary 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A SHAKBMAZ000 SHAKBAZOV, MAZHID 0101017 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 11/01 /2005 ENT ENTRY FROM RUSSIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 214 264 264 2011 N/A $LINGIAN000 SLINGBY, IAN L. E 12/13/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 2b4 0101115 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 SKYVIEW 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2011 N/A ;MIT VA000 SMITH, AVANTE L. 0100778 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM DIMMITT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 9 stewh25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS B1RTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTN DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT STATOFRA000 STATON, FRANK L. 0100919 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/21/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM DIMMITT MS. IN HIG 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A TART TA0000 TAEI, TAULA E. E 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 TAUILAUD000 TAUILIILI, AUDREY A. E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2011 • • 2011 from hawaii 0101032 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PACE: 10 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A 0090380 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 N/A TAYLODE 000 TAYLOR, DE SHEA J. 0076254 264 07 2011 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Miller Jr. High in 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A TAYLOMON000 TAYLOR, MONIQUE 0016286 264 07 2011 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY MOVED INTO DISTRICT WAS 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2011 N/A # GRAD YR 2011: 57 stewhv 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT CR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHI. TE CDE DESCRIPTION C0MMENT DISTS DSTY AID SPE LAL STY ;EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ALI SAL001 ALI, SALMAN 0. 0101168 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 F. 01/19/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT TRANSFERED FROM 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A ARZATEUS000 ARZATE, EUSEBIO 0101205 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 N 02/10/2006 ENT ENTRY TRANSFERING FROM BEVERL 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A BARREREY000 BARRERA, REYNALDO 0100744 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM BOC IN SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A BAUTIMAR004 BAUTISTA, MARC A. 0101212 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 N 02/10/2006 ENT ENTRY TRANSFER FROM MERCER M. 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A BENNESITY000 BENNETT, SHYETTA T. 0100797 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CEDARHURST ELEM, B 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A BROWNDEL001 BROWN, DELVIN R_ 0100629 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From TT Minor 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A CAY000 CALDWELL, RAYMOND 0100502 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CEDARHURST ELEMENT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A CARTEDAV000 CARTER, DAVONNE J. 0100695 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM HIGHLAND M.S. IN R 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A CHAKHELN000 CHAKHALOVA, ELNARA K. E 10/27/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2012 FROM RUSSIA 0101047 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:34 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A CRUDUDEV000 CRUDUP, DEVIN L. 0101039 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 10/26/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM WASHINGTON M.S. IN 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A DANGEBAY000 DANGE, BAYLA 0100696 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 K 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM GRAHAM HILL IN SEA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 202 N/A O0RSEWIL001 DORSEY. WILLIAM J. 0100583 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Campbell Hill Elem 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A 3LM' UM000 ELMI, SUMIYA A. 0101325 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 I. 09/2006 ENT ENTRY FANNIN GMIDDLE SCHOOL I 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 11 atewh 3.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST4 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ^A FLOREKAT000 FLORES VARGAS, KATYA 0100749 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM MEXICO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A GAUSEJOS000 CAUSE, JOSHUA J. 0101062 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 10/31/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM ILLAHEE IN FED WAY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A GULALKAM001 GULALIYF.V, KAMAL 0101163 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 01/19/2006 ENT ENTRY STUDENT NEW ARRIVAL FRO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A JAMESXAV000 JAMES, XAVIER E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 2012 0100735 from tigard, or SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 N/A JENNIANA000 JENNINGS, ANASTACIA M. 0101167 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 01/19 /2006 ENT ENTRY TANSFER FROM GRASS LAKE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A LIM STE000 LIM, STEPHENNY P. 0100758 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM HIGHLANn ELEM IN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A MI SAOOO MILLER, ISAAC A. 0101251 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 03/06/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: SPRING LAKE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A MUNA SIM000 MUNA, SIMION W. 0100628 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Saipan 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A MUSSAAZI000 MUSSA, AZIZZA D. 0101300 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 04/18/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM:ETHIOPIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A MUTOIARN000 MUTOIWA, ARNOLD M. 0100504 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM NAMIBIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A NEANGSOM000 NEANG, SOMALY K. 0100503 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM S.'JNiSLO ELEMENTARY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A DROSCJES000 OROSCO CASTANEDA. JESSICA 0101263 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 03/10/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: WASHINGTON 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A AR C000 P:.. ^.U0, MICHAEL R. 0101284 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 lib / 05/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM: FRANKLIN M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A PAGE: 12 tstewh25.p )3.06.01.0- 010029 PEREZED0000 PEREZ, EDUARDO E 12/14/2005 ENT ENTRY 264 264 264 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR OFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL T DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTS DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS_ SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT 0051632 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 2012 N/A QUEAI,KRI000 QURALEY, KRISTEFER A. 0101281 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 04/03/2006 ENT ENTRY ENTER FROM HIGHLANDS M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A SAELEM00001 SAELEE, MOUANG F. 0100432 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 08/30/2005 ENT ENTRY From Wing Luke Elementa 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A SANTOREN000 SANTOS, RENALL E. 0101038 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 10/21 /2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SAIPAN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2014 N/A SERRAKAT000 SERRANO, KATHERINE 0100736 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM COE IN SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A SHTRER0D000 SHIRE, RODA A. 0101207 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 02/13/2006 ENT ENTRY TRANSFER FROM DENNY M.S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 YES 111/1 4/04/2006 ENT ENTRY RE- ENROLL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 4 264 264 2012 N/A SORPRDYE000 SORPRASEUTH, DYEANA G. 0100759 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/07/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM JFK ELEMENTARY IN 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A TAPIAANE000 TAPIA JIMENEZ, ANEL 0100798 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/08/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM CUDAHY CALIF 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A TATINEMI000 TATINSKI, EMILY J. 0100913 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/21/2005 ENT ENTRY FRM NORTH BEACH M.S. OC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A TEJEDCIN000 TEJEDA MENDOZA, CINTHIA G. 0101216 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 02/13/2006 ENT ENTRY JUST ARRIVED FROM MEXIC 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A TOLSOJAN000 TOLSON, JANIECE A. 0100483 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM WING LUKE ELEMENTA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A TUILAJ0H000 TUILATA, JOHN W. 0101033 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 10/19/2005 ENT ENTRY from hawaii 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 110 264 264 7 012 N/A WI T, W1L000 WILBURN, WILLIAM L. 0101153 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 01/09/2006 ENT ENTRY PREVIOUSLY ATTENDED: CE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A PAGE: 13 stewb25.p 3.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:34 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 1110 ATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST6 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS T SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT WILLICAL000 WILLIAMS, CALVIN L. 0051876 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 YES F 01/11/2006 ENT ENTRY FROM ST. THERESE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A WILLIZYN000 WILLIAMS, ZYNEKWA S. 0052172 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 E 09/12/2005 ENT ENTRY FROM SUNNYDALE IN LANCA 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A YOHANADI000 YOHANNES, ADIAM B. 0100596 264 06 2012 Female Active 264 264 F: 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY From Campbell Hill Elem 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A YOHANROB000 YOHANNES, ROBEL M. 0100661 264 06 2012 Male Active 264 264 E 09/06/2005 ENT ENTRY Hill Top Elementary 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2012 N/A # GRAD YR 2012: 43 • • PAGE: 14 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 - -- -GRADE TOTALS - - -- • GRAD. YR GRADE MALE FEMALE BOTH 3 / 0 TOTAL E/W STUDENTS: 155 • • 2010 2011 2012 TOTAL: End of report 27 34 61 21 21 42 31 21 52 79 76 a . V% Y■A SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT \7_5A Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 13 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME ARONIADE000 ARONI, ADEY S. 0090331 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Kent 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO AYALANAN000 AYALA, NANCY L. W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to California /CES 17406 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:38 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DISTH DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT AMIR ABD000 AMIR, ABDULLAI A. 0090146 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 05/10/90 264 264 W 09/05/2005 RET Retained 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2005 2009 08 NO YES YES # GRAD YR 2009: 1 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PACIFIC MIDDLE SCHOOL - 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES 0090392 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 07/16/92 264 264 R 100 0 0 0 BATTICHI000 BATTISTE, CHIKITA K. 0090458 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 09/05/91 264 264 W 01/10/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO: CASCADE 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES CARRIANJ000 CARRILLO SORIA, ANJELES A. 0015934 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 02/03/92 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED OUT OF DISTRICT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 111, PAB000 COBOS, PABLO D. 0050666 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 07/25/92 264 264 09/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Lochburn Middl 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES DAHIRMAH000 DAHIR, MAHAMED A. 0090356 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 03/07/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES DHOBLABD000 DHOBLE, ABDULAHI H. 0090455 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES DIAZ ADR000 DIAZ, ADRIANA 0090469 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 03/30/91 264 264 W 01/24/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO: KILO M.S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:TOTEM M.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES ESTIGMEG000 ESTIGOY, MEGAN 0051259 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/30/91 264 264 W 03/02/2006 T3 Trans Home Sch WITHDRAWL TO: HOME SCHO 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES ETE ION000 ETE, IONATANA 0101140 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 08/28/92 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CASCADE M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES TAV000 ETE, TAVITA • 0101146 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 08/28/92 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer- Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CASCADE M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 1 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL ' DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GAYE PRI000 GAYE, PRICELLIA 0090403 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 04/13/92 264 264 W 04/04/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:MEREDITH M 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES GILLSDAK000 GILLSON, DAKOTA 0090443 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 08/17/92 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES GLOVESHA000 GLOVER, SHAUN P. 0100402 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 10/12/91 264 264 W 09/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO FAIRVIEW J.H. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES GREWAJAS000 GREWAL, JASKIRAT S. 0076059 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 10/18/91 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HAMILDES000 HAMILTON, DESTINI L. 0090410 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 09/29/91 264 264 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to timbercrest jh 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HASSAAHM000 HASSAN, AHMED A. 0090200 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 01/05/92 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES Hs AHAL000 HASSAN, HALIMA A. 0090366 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CEDAR HEIG 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HASSAHAM001 HASSAN, HAMDI M. 0090415 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 09/14/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NELSON MIDDLE SCHOOL - 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HASSASHA000 HASSAN, SHAMSO M. 0101025 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 02/22/2006 ADV Advanced WITHDRAWL TO 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HERNAOSC000 HERNANDEZ VIELMAN, OSCAR A 0090271 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 12/14/91 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer- Confir Moved to Seattle 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HILL RON002 HILL, RONNI D. 0090409 264 08 2010 . Male Inact. 08/05/90 264 264 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO TIMBERCREST JH 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES HUSSASAM000 HUSSAIN, SAMARA 0100972 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/10/91 264 264 W 10/27/2005 TO Transfer - Confir w/d due to absences 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES IIII JAC001 HYLAND, JACQUELYN K. 0090210 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/10/91 264 264 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWAL /CEDAR HEIGHT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES PAGE: 2 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:38 AM nate: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 0111 DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS LT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT TSSAKALI000 ISSAK, ALI H. 0015826 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 05/01/92 264 264 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Chinook 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES JACKSIEN000 JACKSON, IENNAH M. 0090205 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 02/16/92 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NO SHOW 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES JAMISJAC000 JAMISON, JACQUELYN 0015947 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/17/92 264 264 W 10/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Tacoma 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES JARATNAJ000 JARATO, NAJMO M. W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO 0090425 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/26/92 264 264 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES JO COGL0000 JO CORDOVA, GLORIA M. 0100582 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 12/13/91 264 264 W 10/17/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO FLORIDA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES JOHNSMIC002 JOHNSON, MICHAEL D. 0090483 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 09/15/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to north beach mi 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 1110 KARNS, DANIELLE M. 0075442 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 09/01/91 264 264 W 09/19/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO LAKOTA MIDDLE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES KAUFMJON000 KAUFMAN, JONATHAN H. 0101016 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 10/29/91 264 264 W 10/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO EXPLORER 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES LARSOBRE002 LARSON, BRENT G. 0051647 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 08/26/92 264 264 W 02/09/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:MAYWOOD M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES LENNELEQ000 LENNETT, LEQUAN J. 0051049 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 03/06/92 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO:MEANY M.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES LOPEZSAL001 LOPEZ JR, SALVADOR 0016210 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 08/25/92 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Sylvester M.S. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES MATHEJAI000 MATHEW, JAIMIE K. 0050533 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 07/15/92 264 264 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Chinook 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES t UNAT000 MCLAUGHLIN, NATASHA L. 0051816 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 07/25/92 264 264 03/07/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES PAGE: 3 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Washington M.S 17406 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES PARENMAR000 PARENT, MARIAH N. W 11/04/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: SYLVESTER 17406 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO SANCHKIA000 SANCHEZ, KIANA M. 0101040 W 11/04/2005 TO Transfer - Confir HOME SCHOOL 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT PAGE: 4 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT MILLEVIC000 MILLER, VICTORIA J. 0090411 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/03/91 264 264 MUGAZHAB000 MUGAZA, HABIBA A. 0090414 - 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 01/01/92 264 264 W 02/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: AUBURN M. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES NEPHEDAV000 NEPHEW, DAVID K. 0100655 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 02/18/91 264 264 W 11/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir PER:MR.LAIGO OKAY 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES OJEDAALE000 OJEDA SANCHEZ, ALEXIS 0100793 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 05/18/92 264 264 W 01/20/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWAN TO:CASCADE M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES OWEN KAY000 OWEN, KAYLENA J. 0090243 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 11/26/91 264 264 W 10/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN: HIGHLINE S.D 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 0090394 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 06/01/92 11111 RIC000 PIO, RICHARD A. 0090201 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 05/27/92 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITDRAWAN TO: TOTEM M.S 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO. YES REYESSHA000 REYES, SHANTE L. 0090360 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/13/91 264 264 W 03/08/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: SYLVESTER 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES RODRIMAY000 RODRIGUEZ, MAYRA 0100666 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 09/07/92 264 264 W 10/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir STUDENT TRANSFERRED OUT 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 YES Time 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 R 100 0 0 0 SAJIDFIZ000 SAJID, FIZZA 0100970 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 03/06/92 264 264 W 11/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Parent told me week of 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES SANCHJUA001 SANCHEZ, JUAN A. 0051269 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 02/24/92 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: AKI KUROS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 04/26/92 264 264 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 NO YES 410 HMAR004 SANCHEZ, MARIO R. 0090248 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 03/20/92 264 264 11/04/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO CHINOOK 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010b29 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR OFT ENT OR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SIHITNAT000 SIHITE, NATALIO A. 0100740 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 12/28/92 264 264 W 02/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED BACK TO INDONESIA 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES STEPHCOU000 STEPHENS, COURTNEY B. 0090482 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 02/07/91 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES STERLDEZ000 STERLING HOLMES, DEZMONE T 0100794 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 10/25/90 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES STEVESEP000 STEVENS, SEPTA E. 0075955 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 08/25/92 264 264 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CORVALLIS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES VEGA CYN000 VEGA, CYNTHIA P. 0090198 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 11/16/91 264 264 W 02/23/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: ROCHESTER 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES VILLADEN000 VTLLAR, DENISSE V. 0076363 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 12/04/91 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Alderwood Midd 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES 11101 MAROOI WADE, MARICCO R. 0101158 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 09/11/91 264 264 W 03/23/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: IIIAHEE M 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES WILEYJOS000 WILEY, JOSEPH 0015944 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 12/29/91 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES WRIGHAMB000 WRIGHT, AMBER C. 0100852 264 08 2010 Female Inact. 06/12/92 264 264 W 02/09/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO DENNY M.S 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES ZOEPFJAK000 ZOEPFL, JAKOB A. 0075817 264 08 2010 Male Inact. 06/30/92 264 264 W 10/10/2005 TO Transfer - Confir HAMILTON M.S. IN SEATTL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2010 08 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2010: 60 ABERAHAN000 ABERA, HANNAH T. 0051094 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 11/17/92 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer- Confir WENT TO CHINOOK 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES BAILEMAU000 BAILEY, MAURICE B. 0100796 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 01/02/93 264 264 W 03/07/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: CHINOOK M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES �ARI000 BECKET, ARIAS 0101127 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 07/01/93 264 264 W 02/28/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CEDAR CRES 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES PAGE: 5 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 010'029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:38 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT BELLOERI000 BELLO GUZMAN, ERIKA I. 0100678 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 04/08/91 264 264 W 01/03/2006 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES CARTEIMU000 CARTER, IMUNIQUE C. 0051890 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 03/25/93 264 264 W 05/16/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:MERCER M.S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES CRUZ ART000 CRUZ, ARTURO 0016044 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 10/29/92 264 264 W 12/16/2005 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO HARLEM JR 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES DUBUQBRA000 DUBUQUE, BRANDON J. 0076337 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 05/13/92 264 264 W 03/16/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:MILL CREEK 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES FELI:CJEN000 FELICIANO, JENICA A. 0051662 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 05/22/92 264 264 W 09/22/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Guam 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES FILO ERI000 FILO, ERIC S. 0100420 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 12/16/93 264 264 W 09/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Aki Kurose M.S 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES AELI003 GONZALEZ FERNANDEZ, ELIZAB 0090427 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 12/24/92 264 264 W 12/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Burien 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES GONZAJAC000 GONZALEZ, JACKELINE E. 0090347 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 03/10/92 264 264 W 09/20/2005 TO Transfer - Confir nelson middle school, r 17406 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES COM R 100 0 0 0 GOUGHJOS000 GOUGH, JOSEPH W. 0050987 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 07/22/93 264 264 W 03/08/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES HASSAABD004 HASSAN, ABDULKADIR A. 0051879 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 07/13/93 264 264 W 09/08/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to dimmitt 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES HASSAMOH003 HASSAN, MOHAMED A. 0090367 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 01/01/93 264 264 W 02/22/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CEDAR HEIG 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES HAYS AMA000 HAYS, AMANDA A. W 05/09/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:FEDERALWAY 17406 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES 0076518 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 04/14/93 264 264 R 100 0 0 0 II KRI000 HOGAN, KRISTA M. 0016104 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 09/11/92 264 264 09/15/2005 TO Transfer - Confir HOME SCHOOLED 17406 R 1.00 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 6 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 016029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAI, SCHL Ili DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT IBRAHZAK000 IBRAHIM, ZAKARIA A. 0050796 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 09/09/92 264 264 W 12/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Burien /PER:MR. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES JACKSANT002 JACKSON, ANTHONY D. 0100783 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 06/07/93 264 264 W 12/09/2005 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO- LAKEVIEW 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES JONESMER000 JONES, MERCEDES A. 0090456 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 02/15/92 264 264 W 02/06/2006 TO Transfer - Confir MOVING TO ATLANTA GA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES KATCHKYR000 KATCHEECH WILLIAMS, KYRIEN 0100887 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 12/25/93 264 264 W 04/28/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: CHINOOK M 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES KORCZBEN000 KORCZAK, BENJAMIN M. 0017198 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 04/12/93 264 264 W 09/20/2005 TO Transfer - Confir nelson middle school in 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES LAULUHOP000 LAULU, HOPE P. 0076232 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 12/19/92 264 264 W 01/04/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO: MAR VIST 17406 264 264 264 2005 2011 07 NO NO YES R 100 0 0 0 ICHR000 MARTINEZ, CHRISTIAN 0051823 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 02/28/93 264 264 W 09/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWAN TO: NELSON M 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES PENDEDAV000 PENDERGRAFT, DAVID A. 0051557 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 02/10/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Yelm Middle Sc 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES PETERADR000 PETERSEN, ADRIAN J. 0051048 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 04/23/93 264 264 W 11/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO AKI KUROS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES PICKEDE'000 PICKETT, DE'AUZ'JANAE A. 0090385 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 03/07/93 264 264 W 03/20/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: MEANY M.M 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES RAMSOHEN001 RAMSON, HENRIQUES 0016186 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 05/25/93 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer- Confir WITHDRAWN TO:A.A.A. M.S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES RIOS VER000 RIOS, VERONICA 0090391 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 01/24/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO TOTEM MIDDLE S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES 41/1 LES000 RIZO, LESLIE R. 0100823 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 07/07/93 264 264 01/09/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO LESLIE RI 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES PAGE: 7 latewh25.9 03.06.01.0- 010029 SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:38 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NHR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DATE _ CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST6 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY $EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT ROJASANA000 ROJAS, ANA 0090475 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 08/18/92 264 264 W 04/05/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:MOVED OUT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES W 05/15/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WTTHDRAWL TO:MOVED OUT 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES SANCHSAM000 SANCHEZ, SAMMAY 0051271 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 08/01/93 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: AKI KUROS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES SANDOJON000 SANDOVAL, JONATHAN 0051794 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 06/15/93 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Went to Denny M.S. in S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES SERRAERI000 SERRANO, ERIC A. 0090359 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 05/24/93 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer- Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES SOP KAV000 SOP, KAVIE K. 0075608 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 07/28/92 264 264 W 11/07/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWAN TO AKI KURO 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES STEVEKAI000 STEVENS, KAITHLYN R. 0101214 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 05/04/93 264 264 02/13/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: PACIFIC M 17406 PUB • R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES SZETODER000 SZETO, DEREK A. 0075846 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 01/25/93 264 264 W 09/30/2005 TO Transfer - Confir McClure M.S. in Seattle 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES THONGKYL000 THONGKHAM, KYLE C. 0090459 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 11/08/91 264 264 W 11/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: DIMMIT M. 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES TOFAECIA000 TOFAEONO, CIARA F. 0051451 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 08/19/93 264 264 W 10/12/2005 TO Transfer - Confir KILO JR HI IN FEDERAL W 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES TRICHVIC000 TRICHANH, VICTORIA L. 0090460 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 12/20/92 264 264 W 10/07/2005 TO Transfer - Confir CASCADE MIDDLE SCHOOL, 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES TYSONGER000 TYSON, GERRT M. 0090407 264 07 2011 Female Inact. 08/20/92 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer- Confir moved to seattle 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES VU VIN000 VU, VINH X. 0100484 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 07/30/93 264 264 W 10/20/2005 TO Transfer - Confir BOC IN SEATTLE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES WIGGIKAI000 WIGGINS, KAISER F. 0101150 264 07 2011 Male Inact. 05/06/93 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CASCADE M. 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2011 07 NO NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 8 latewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 016029 ABDT KAH000 ABDT, KARA 0. W 09/23/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL Time: 8:38 AM ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL 110 DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT 0051063 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 11/22/93 264 264 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES ARTEAAIM000 ARTEAGA MENDOZA, AIMEE E. 0016608 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 05/13/94 264 264 W 09/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Madrona Elemen 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES BECK BRA000 BECK GMEINER, BRANDON W. 0076644 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 12/05/93 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Centennial Middle Sch i 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES BEILEDUA000 BEILEH, DUALEH A. 0100383 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/30/93 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO ANOTHER SCHOOL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES CAWICDEN000 CAWICH, DENNIS V. 0100672 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 02/04/94 264 264 W 01/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir DENNIS V. CAWICH IS MOV 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES CISNEANG000 CISNEROS, ANGEL 0100225 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 05/09/93 264 264 W 02/06/2006 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 11111 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES CUSTOBEN000 CUSTOVIC, BENJAMIN 0016502 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 12/15/93 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer- Confir WENT TO NEELY O'BRIEN E 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES DELGADAV000 DELGADO, DAVID 0016316 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/13/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO MAYWOOD IN ISS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES DIAZ MIR000 DIAZ, MIREYA 0017379 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 07/05/92 264 264 W 04/17/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: TOTEM M.S 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES DOAN JAS000 DOAN, JASON 0076637 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 01/21/93 264 264 W 09/13/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to fisher jh in e 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES EASTLROB000 EASTLICK, ROBERT W. 0016335 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 02/09/94 264 264 W 04/03/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: TACOMA SC 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES ESPINSTE000 ESPINO, STEPHANIE 0051552 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 01/18/94 264 264 W 09/15/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO PINE TREE ELEM 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES • JOH000 FERRARO, JOHN V. W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO 0051640 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 05/08/94 264 264 17406 R 100 0 0 0 NO YES Date: 06/01/06 PAGE: 9 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0 - 014029 .SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 STUDENT KEY NAME ID NBA DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE. CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST6 DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT GARCIMIC000 GARCIA, MICHELLE 0016458 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 08/23/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO HILL TOP ELEM 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES GAYE OMA000 GAYE, OMAR 0052063 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 08/02/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO BOW LAKE IN HI 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES GILDEDEA000 GILDEN, DEANDRE J. 0016501 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 07/23/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir no show 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES GONZAART000 GONZALEZ, ARTEMIO 0017345 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 08/13/94 264 264 W 12/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moving to Burien 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES GUERZMIC000 GUERZON, MICHAEL A. 0051281 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 11/08/93 264 264 W 09/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Gone to Riverton Height 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES GUTIEMIC000 GUTIERREZ, MICHAEL A. 0051680 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/10/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to roxton, texas 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES I ST F.001 HARRIES, STEPHEN A. 0075960 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 10/14/93 264 264 W 09/15/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO CALIFORNIA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES HILL IAN000 HILL, IAN J. 0052076 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 08/01/94 264 264 W 09/28/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Bear Creek Elementary, 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES IBRAHRAM000 IBRAHIM, RAMLA 0016473 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 01/17/94 264 264 W 12/05/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Burien /PER:MR. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES ISIORLAU000 ISIORDIA, LAURA 0100181 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 01/07/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NO SHOW 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES W 05/15/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:BEVERLY PA 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES JAMISCHR000 JAMISON, CHRISTOPHER J. 0100168 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 08/19/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Elmhurst Eleme 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES JONESMYR000 JONES, MYRIN D. 0100386 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/02/93 264 264 W 09/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Meadowride Ele 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES KIM ROB000 KIM, ROBIN K. 0051562 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 07/30/93 264 264 W 11. /01./2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO SURPRISE 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES PAGE: 10 letewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT NT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE CAL SCHL DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS KING KRI000 KING, KRISTOPHER T. 0051777 264 06 2012 Male inact. 01/29/94 264 264 W 03/14/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO: PINECREST 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES LORESMEG000 LORESTO, MEGAN M. 0075949 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 07/30/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES MARTICRI000 MARTINEZ, CRISTIAN 0051683 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 10/12/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Nelson Middle School in 17406 COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES MEY JALE000 MEY JR, ALEXANDER 0052180 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 03/08/94 264 264 W 09/22/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Skyway 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES MEZA NAZ000 MEZA, NAZARETH 0051020 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 05/29/93 264 264 W 11/02/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO MADRONA ELEMEN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES MILO ST0000 MILO, STONE 0076231 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 07/06/94 264 264 W 01/03/2006 TO Transfer - Confir TRANSFERED TO: BAYSIDE 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES 1/11 4 TIN000 NMAti, TINICEE 0076653 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 03/09/94 264 264 W 09/12/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO DALTON M.S. IN 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES NWOSUANI000 NWOSUOCHA, ANIKA 0076416 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 12/14/93 264 264 W 02/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: MOVING oU 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES PHAIRAUT000 PRAIA NEVENS, AUTUMN A. 0100189 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 01/04/94 264 264 W 11/07/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: LAKOTA M. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES RAMSORA0000 RAMSON, RAQUTA M. 0016340 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 08/07/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWAN TO: A.A.A. S 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES REID JEN000 REID, JENNIFER M. 0051080 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 07/25/94 264 264 W 11/21/2005 TO Transfer - Confir NORTH HILL IN DESMOINES 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES SA RUN000 SA, RUNI 0076234 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 10/11/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO HILL TOP ELEME 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES ill/ IGI0000 SANTIAGO, GIOVANNA C. 0017263 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 06/19/94 264 264 09/26/2005 TO Transfer- Confir moved to Dimmitt Middle 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES PAGE: 11 lstewh25.p 03.06.01.0- 010029 STUDENT KEY NAME SHOWALTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRY /WITHDRAWAL REPORT Time: 8:38 AM Date: 06/01/06 ID NBR DFT ENT GR GD YR GS YR GENDER STATUS BIRTHDATE RACE. CAL SCHL Y DATE CDE DESCRIPTION COMMENT DIST# DSTY AID SPE LAL STY %EN PSEO STE ATDAYS MBRDAYS ENT SCHL CAL SCHL YR GRAD YR GR GLO ADVANCED RETAINED DFLT ENT SIHITJUL000 SIHITE, JULIAN A. 0100734 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 07/14/94 264 264 W 02/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN: MOVED BACK T 17406 PUB R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES SINGHGUR006 SINGH, GURJOTE 0100737 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/12/93 264 264 W 01/02/2006 TO Transfer - Confir MOVED TO KENT WASHINGTO 17406 PUB COM R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES SPEARSHA000 SPEAR, SHAUN J. 0017140 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 03/19/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir STUDENT TRANSFERED OUT 17406 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES R 100 0 0 0 STEPHAIM000 STEPHENS, AIMEE R. 0076675 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 05/17/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Kent Mountain 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES STEVEDAV000 STEVENS, DAVID M. 0075954 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 12/22/93 264 264 W 02/15/2006 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWL TO:CORVALLIS 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES STEWARON000 STEWART, RONALD W. 0052035 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 03/17/94 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Tech Valley Ch 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES '.IMAK000 TAUSINGA, MAKALINA 0017032 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 09/08/94 264 264 W 09/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to Madrona Elemen 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES TIL DAV000 TIL, DAVY 0076035 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 09/21/93 264 264 W 09/06/2005 TO Transfer - Confir 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES TUITEAAR000 TUITELELEAPAGA, AARON A. 0100427 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 12/02/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir Moved to Aki Kurose Mid 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES TWEETTES000 TWEET, TESSA M. 0016373 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 10/19/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO: EXPLORER 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES VALDEEST000 VALDEZ, ESTEVAN 0051980 264 06 2012 Male Inact. 02/20/94 264 264 W 09/29/2005 TO Transfer - Confir WITHDRAWN TO:VOYAGER M. 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES YUSUFKHA000 YUSUF, KHADRA A. 0051775 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 04/30/94 264 264 W 10/26/2005 TO Transfer - Confir moved to seattle 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES FKAR000 ZOEPFL, KARLIE R. 0075818 264 06 2012 Female Inact. 06/24/94 264 264 10/10/2005 TO Transfer - Confir HAMILTON M.S. IN SEATTL 17406 R 100 0 0 0 264 264 264 2006 2012 06 NO NO YES # GRAD YR 2012: 52 PAGE: 12