The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOW 2015-08-24 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKET4. wqs Tukwila City Council Agenda • COMMITTEE •OF THE WHOLE ❖ . Q( o Jim Haggerton, Mayor Counc/lmembers: ❖ Joe Duffie ❖ Dennis Robertson Cline, CityAdministrator • Allan Ekberg ❖ Verna Seal Kruller, Council President • Kathy Hougardy ❖ De'Sean Quinn x908 David Kate Monday, August 24, 2015, 7:00 PM Tukwila City Hall Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER / PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PROCLAMATION A proclamation honoring "Women's Equality Day." Pg.1 3. CITIZEN COMMENT At this time, you are invited to comment on items not included on this agenda is (please limit your comments to five minutes per citizen). To comment on an item listed on this agenda, please save your comments until the issue presented for discussion. 4. SPECIAL ISSUES a. An ordinance authorizing and providing for the acquisition of interests in land for the purpose of completing the South 144th Street Phase II Project; providing for condemnation, appropriation, taking of land and property rights necessary therefore; providing for payment thereof and directing the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the manner provided by law and for said condemnation. Notice of Final Action. The properties considered are located in the City of Tukwila and identified as parcel numbers: 152304 -9013 004000 -0205 004000 -0215 004000 -0210 (at 4060 5 144th Street, 14410 41st Avenue 5, 4057 5 144th Street, and 4053 5 144th Street). Public comments will be accepted. Q b. Contract Supplement #2 to contract #14 -103 with KPG, Inc., for the South 144th Street (Tukwila International Boulevard to 42nd Avenue South) acquisition services. c. Consultant contracts for the arena project. d. Review and update of three of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan Elements: Tukwila International Boulevard, Housing, and Residential Neighborhoods, and the plan's Introduction, Vision, Glossary and Land Use Map Legend. Please bring your Comprehensive Plan binder. Q Pg.3 Pg.21 Pg.35 Pg.103 5. REPORTS a. Mayor b. City Council c. Staff d. City Attorney e. Intergovernmental 6. MISCELLANEOUS 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING (continued...) COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING Monday, August 24, 2015 Page 2 • SPECIAL MEETING •• • Ord #2480 • Res #1862 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL 2. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approval of Vouchers. b. Consultant contracts for the arena project: (1) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to contract #15 -059 with Daley Morrow Poblete, Inc., for water, sewer and stormwater analysis relating to the proposed arena in the amount of $30,000. (2) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 2 to contract #15 -078 with Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) review relating to the proposed arena project in the amount of $40,000. (3) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to contract #15 -084 with Fehr & Peers for traffic analysis relating to the proposed arena project in the amount of $20,000. (4) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to contract #15 -107 with Shiels Obletz Johnsen for project management relating to the proposed arena project in the amount of $65,000. (5) Authorize the Mayor to sign Amendment No. 1 to contract #15 -127 with Fehr & Peers for parking analysis relating to the proposed arena project in the amount of $12,500. Pg.35 Pg.39 Pg.53 Pg.67 Pg.79 Pg.89 3. NEW BUSINESS 4. ADJOURNMENT Tukwila City Hall is wheelchair accessible. Reasonable accommodations are available at public hearings with advance notice to the City Clerk's Office (206 -433 -1800 or TukwilaCityClerk @TukwilaWA.gov). This notice is available at www.tukwilawa.gov, and in alternate formats with advance notice for those with disabilities. Tukwila Council meetings are audio /video taped. HOW TO TESTIFY If you would like to address the Council, please go to the podium and state your name and address clearly for the record. Please observe the basic rules of courtesy when speaking and limit your comments to five minutes. The Council appreciates hearing from citizens but may not be able to take immediate action on comments received until they are referred to a Committee or discussed under New Business. COUNCIL MEETINGS No Council meetings are scheduled on the 5th Monday of the month unless prior public notification is given. Regular Meetings - The Mayor, elected by the people to a four -year term, presides at all Regular Council Meetings held on the 1st and 3rd Mondays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Official Council action in the form of formal motions, adopting of resolutions and passing of ordinances can only be taken at Regular Council meetings. Committee of the Whole Meetings - Council members are elected for a four -year term. The Council President is elected by the Council members to preside at all Committee of the Whole meetings for a one -year term. Committee of the Whole meetings are held the 2nd and 4th Mondays at 7:00 p.m. Issues discussed are forwarded to the Regular Council meeting for official action. GENERAL INFORMATION At each Council meeting citizens are given the opportunity to address the Council on items that are not included on the agenda during CITIZENS COMMENTS. Please limit your comments to 5 minutes. Special Meetings may be called at any time with proper public notice. Procedures followed are the same as those used in Regular Council meetings. Executive Sessions may be called to inform the Council of pending legal action, financial, or personnel matters. PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearings are required by law before the Council can take action on matters affecting the public interest such as land -use laws, annexations, rezone requests, public safety issues, etc. Section 2.04.150 of the Tukwila Municipal Code states the following guidelines for Public Hearings: entation. ach. No one may speak a second 1. The proponent shall speak first and is allowed 15 minutes for a prese The opponent is then allowed 15 minutes to make a presentation. 3. Each side is then allowed 5 minutes for rebuttal. 4. Citizens who wish to address the Council may speak for 5 minutes e time until everyone wishing to speak has spoken. 5. After each speaker has spoken, the Council may question the speaker question, but may not engage in further debate at this time. 6. After the Public Hearing is closed and during the Council meeting, the Council may choose to discuss the issue among themselves, or defer the discussion to a future Council meeting, without further public testimony. Council action may only be taken during Regular or Special Meetings. Each speaker can respond to the Office of the Mayor • City of Tukwila, Washington • PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, on November 8, 1910, the State Constitution was amended to give women in Washington State the right to vote; and WHEREAS, on August 26, 1920, the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution extended the vote to women nationwide; and WHEREAS, on the anniversary of the 19th Amendment we celebrate Women's Equality Day and the progress that has been made toward securing women's full participation in our democracy and renew our commitment to securing equal rights, freedoms, and opportunities for all women; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila is committed to the elimination of obstacles to full equality for all; and WHEREAS, the City of Tukwila urges its citizens to recognize the full value of women's skills and significant contributions to its labor force; NOW THEREFORE, I, Jim Haggerton, Mayor of the City of Tukwila, do hereby proclaim August 26, 2015: Women's Equality Day in the City of Tukwila and encourage all public officials, educators, businesses, community leaders and the residents of Tukwila to join me in recognizing this special observance. Signed this twenty - fourth day of August, 2015. Jim rton, Mayor 2 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS ---------------------------------- litil, Meefing Date Prepare ' J Mayor's re�Oiv Council review 08/24/15 BG-&9 C Z 1 09/08/15 BG ❑ Other Mtg Date SPONSOR [:]Council ❑ Mayor [:1 HR ❑ DCD D.Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police Z PWI SPONSOR'S Final design of the South 144th St Phase 11 Project is nearly complete. Right-of-Way is SUMMARY needed along the project in order to construct the proposed improvements. This Ordinance will provide the authority to acquire the right-of-way on four parcels with the most square footage from the King County Housing Authority. Council is being asked to approve this Ordinance for Right-of-Way with possible condemnation, if needed. REVIEWED BY ❑ cow Mtg. F-1 CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte 0 Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 08/17/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOE DUFFIE RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works Department COMMIVI'EE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITUiu-, Ri,,QUII;LI,D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (PAGE 15, 2015 CIP) Comments.- MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 08/24/15 ITEM INFORMATION ITEMNO. EA W, M" I 3 ISTAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON I ORIGINAi, AGENDA DATE: 08/24/15 AGENDA ITEM TITLE South 144th St Phase 11 Project (42nd Ave S - Tukwila Int'l Blvd) Ordinance for Acquisition of Right-of-Way CATEGORY Z Discussion Mtg Date 08124115 ❑ Motion Mtg Date ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mt Date 09108119 ❑ BidAivard Mtg Date Z Public Hearing Mtg Date 08124115 ❑ Other Mtg Date SPONSOR [:]Council ❑ Mayor [:1 HR ❑ DCD D.Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police Z PWI SPONSOR'S Final design of the South 144th St Phase 11 Project is nearly complete. Right-of-Way is SUMMARY needed along the project in order to construct the proposed improvements. This Ordinance will provide the authority to acquire the right-of-way on four parcels with the most square footage from the King County Housing Authority. Council is being asked to approve this Ordinance for Right-of-Way with possible condemnation, if needed. REVIEWED BY ❑ cow Mtg. F-1 CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte 0 Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 08/17/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOE DUFFIE RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR/ADMIN. Public Works Department COMMIVI'EE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITUiu-, Ri,,QUII;LI,D AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREETS (PAGE 15, 2015 CIP) Comments.- MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 08/24/15 09/08/15 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 08/24/5 Informational Memorandum dated 08/14/15 Draft Ordinance with Exhibits of Legal Descriptions and Maps Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 08/17/15 09/08/15 3 El City of Tukwila Jim Haggerion, Mayor TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager DATE: August 14, 2015 SUBJECT: S 14411h Street Phase II Project (42nd Ave S to Tukwila Int'I Blvd) Project No. 99510402 Ordinance for Acquisition of Right -of -Way ISSUE Approve Ordinance to acquire property from four separate parcels for the S 1441h Street Phase II Project. BACKGROUND Final design for the S 144th Street Phase II Project is nearly complete. The 90% plans have been used to develop the right -of- way (ROW) needs for the project. The City entered into a supplemental agreement with the design consultant, KPG, for the ROW acquisition process, which included developing the legal descriptions, appraisals, development of Administration Offer Summaries, and a Project Funding Estimate (PFE) to aid staff in determining budget needs for the ROW phase. DISCUSSION Four parcels will be impacted by the additional ROW needs of the S 144th St Phase II Project. Two are residential properties and the area needed to purchase is not actively used by the property owners and in fact, operates as a de facto unpaved sidewalk today. The other two properties are owned by the King County Library System (the site of the existing Foster Library) and the King County Housing Authority. A small portion of the Foster Library site is needed to accommodate the sidewalk and curb return at the northwest corner of the S 1441h St and 42nd Ave S intersection, but the impacts to the property are minimal. The King County Housing Authority site will be impacted the most. A small amount of land (1,317 sq. ft.) needs to be acquired. Although this is a minimal amount of land, the acquisition results in the loss of two parking stalls and modifications to existing concrete steps. The details are shown in the following table with approximate property square footage: Parcel No. Owners ROW Required SF 152304 -9013 ;King County Library System 114 sf 004000 -0205 :King County Housing Authority 1,317 sf 004000 -0215 1 Nguyen Coi & Ming Le 290 sf 004000-0210 :Minh -Thu T. Bui & Quang T. Le 997 sf The attached ordinance provides the authority to acquire the portions of the four properties through the eminent domain process if necessary. As with previous projects that have involved acquiring additional property, the City will do everything within its power to work cooperatively with the property owners. However, should the City not be successful in these efforts, condemnation of the property would be required. Letters have been mailed to the owners notifying them of this potential condemnation and the Council's schedule for ordinance approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT None. Adoption of this Ordinance prior to the property acquisition process does not commit the City to any financial obligation or to use the eminent domain process. Condemnation will only be used in the event that standard negotiations are unsuccessful. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve the Ordinance authorizing acquisition of property from four separate parcels and consider this item at the August 24, 2015 Committee of the Whole and subsequent September 8, 2015 Regular Meeting. Attachments: Draft Ordinance with Exhibits of Legal Description and Map wApw eng\projects\a- rw & rs projects \s 144th st phase ii fib - 42nd ave s (99510402 95 -rw02) \design \row \into memo row acq ordinance 08 -14 -15 gi - sb - bg.docx 5 A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ACQUISITION OF INTERESTS IN LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF COMPLETING THE SOUTH 144TH STREET PHASE II PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR CONDEMNATION, APPROPRIATION, TAKING OF LAND AND PROPERTY RIGHTS NECESSARY THEREFORE; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT THEREOF AND DIRECTING THE INITIATION OF APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED BY LAW AND FOR SAID CONDEMNATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has. entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement dated as of October 30, 2012 with the Tukwila Village Development Associates, LLC (the "Developer"), which gives the Developer exclusive rights to acquire and develop certain parcels of real property owned by the City located at the intersection of Tukwila International Boulevard and S. 144th Street, commonly known as the "Tukwila Village Property;" and WHEREAS, under Tukwila Municipal Code Section 11.12.030, the Developer is required to install curbs and gutters, sidewalks and other frontage improvements in accordance with specifications and standards of the Tukwila Municipal Code and approved by the Public Works Department as part of the Tukwila Village site development; and WHEREAS, the City has funded and will complete a street improvement project titled South 144th Street Phase II, which includes minor road widening, sidewalks, bike lanes, on- street parking, a new traffic signal at 42nd Avenue South, landscaping and other improvements and amenities in accordance with specifications and standards of the Tukwila Municipal Code and approved by the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer have agreed that the City will construct the Developer required frontage improvements and amenities because the required frontage improvements would be more efficiently constructed as part of the City's Project; and W: Word Processing\OrdinancesWcquisition for So 144th St Phase II Project 8-11 -15 Page 1 of 3 CK:bjs 7 WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, the City Council adopted the 2015 -2020 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), by Resolution No. 1848; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the public health, safety, necessity and convenience demand that the South 144th Street Phase II Project be undertaken at this time and that in order to carry out the project it is necessary at this time for the City to acquire interests and rights to the property described herein; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares it necessary and in the best interest of the public that interests in the land and property rights hereinafter described be condemned, appropriated, and taken for public use, subject to the making or paying of just compensation td the owners thereof in the manner provided by law; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized by. RCW 35A.64.200 and Chapter 8.12 RCW to initiate eminent domain proceedings for the condemnation of the property; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Final Action was duly noticed in accordance with RCW 8.25.290, and on August 24, 2015, the Tukwila City Council accepted public comments relating to the property described herein; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The land and property rights within the City of Tukwila, King County, Washington, identified by tax parcel numbers in King County, Washington as 152304- 9013, 004000 -0205, 004000 -0215, and 004000 -0210, commonly known as 4060 South 144th Street, 14410 41st Avenue South, 4057 South 144th Street, and 4053 South 144th Street, Tukwila, Washington 98188, respectively, and further described in the attached Exhibits A through Exhibit D, are necessary for construction of the South 144th Street Phase If Project (the "Project ") described herein, subject to making or paying just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by law. Section 2. The City of Tukwila specifically finds construction of the Project to be a public use, specifically the construction of minor widening to South 144th Street in order to provide widened sidewalks, bike lanes on both sides of the road, on- street parking, buffer zones, pavement overlay, upgraded illumination, revised channelization, curb, gutter, ADA accessible ramps at crosswalks, a mid -block crosswalk with median and rapid flash 'pedestrian beacon, street - scaping, new traffic- actuated signalization at the intersection of South 144th Street and 42nd Avenue South, and an upgrade to the storm drainage system. The City Council specifically finds construction of the Project to be necessary, and in the best interests of its citizens. Section 3. The cost and expense of acquiring said property rights shall be paid from the 2015 grant awarded to Tukwila by the Transportation Improvement Board, impact fees, general funds of the City of Tukwila, and from other monies applicable thereto that the City may have available or may obtain. The Director of the Public Works Department or his designee is hereby authorized to negotiate with and make offers to the owners of said land or property for the purposes of making or paying just W: Word ProcessinglOrdinanceslAcquisition for So 144th St Phase II Project 8 -11 -15 CK:bjs Page 2 of 3 i compensation, and to approve the payment of just compensation as negotiated with said owners or as ordered by the Court. Section 4. In the absence of negotiated purchases with the affected property owners, the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to undertake proceedings provided by law to condemn, appropriate, and take the property necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance. The City Attorney is further authorized to approve and enter into any and all such agreements, stipulations, and orders necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance, including for the payment of just compensation as agreed to with the property owners, or as ordered by the Court. Section 5. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering and section /subsection numbering. Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be invalid or 'Unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation. Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days after passage and publication as provided by law. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at a Regular Meeting thereof this day of , 2015. ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: Christy O'Flaherty, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Rachel B. Turpin, City Attorney Jim Haggerton, Mayor Filed with the City Clerk:_ Passed by the City Council:, Published: Effective Date: Ordinance Number: Attachments: Exhibit A — Legal Description and Map for Parcel No. 152304 -9013 Exhibit B — Legal Description and Map for Parcel No. 004000 -0205 Exhibit C — Legal Description and Map for Parcel No. 004000 -0215 Exhibit D — Legal Description and Map for Parcel No. 004000 -0210 W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Acquisition for So 144th St Phase II Project 8-11 -15 CK:bjs Page 3 of 3 6C 10 EXHIBIT A PARCEL NO. 152304 -9013 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION THAT PORTION OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL A" LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE,• BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 'A', SAID CORNER ALSO BEING ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 144TH STREET,' THENCE SOUTH 870 35'01 "EAST ALONG SAID MARGIN, 187.07 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EASTERLY, NORTHEASTERLY, AND NORTHERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, WHOSE CENTER BEARS NORTH 020 24'59" EAST, 25.00 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 39.69 FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 42ND AVENUE SOUTH AND TERMINUS .OF SAID LINE DESCRIPTION. CONTAINING 114 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A ": (PER STEWART TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 01148- 42382, DATED APRIL 9, 2015) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 294.50 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W. M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE PLAT OF CHERRY LANE, RECORDED IN VOLUME 48 OF PLATS, PAGE 21, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, EXCEPT THE NORTH 65 FEET OF THE EAST 120 FEET THEREOF,, AND EXCEPT THE EAST 30 FEET AND THE SOUTH 20 FEET FOR ROADS; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE REMAINDER DEEDED TO KING COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES BY RECORDING NUMBERS 7503240296 AND 7910010716. 5- - /0 -IS 152304- 9013- ROW.DOCX Page 1 of 1 ]KIPC1,01 TACOMA• KATll.r 11 SW 1/4, SEC. 15, T. ITAX LOT NUMBER 155420 -0033 W Z J H W O I� TAX LOT NUMBER 155420 -0035 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. TAX LOT NUMBER i 152304 -9208 c PROPERTY LINE O W _ o C.7 _ Z �? X Cil Z p V) xI W VARIES I TAX LOT NUMBER 152304 -9013 I TAX LOT NUMBER ° �— 155420 -0034 I NI O O POB Q 187.Q7' Of RIGHT OF WAY I N AREA = 114 S.F.f R= 25.00" 10.00' L= 39.69' cz> TPOB 20.17' S 8735'011' E EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY � S 144TH ST LF41 jw L Eall i I N.T.S. DATE: MAY 15, 2015 FILE: 152304 - 9013 - "CLUNG KPCxill EXHIBIT A T53su,A�aN 2502 Jefferson Ave PARCEL 152304 -9013 Seaflle,WA98109 Tamma,WA98402 (206)26F,640 (263) 627 -0720 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 12 EXHIBIT B PARCEL NO. 004000 -0205 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION THE NORTH TEN FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED TRACT. CONTAINING '1,317 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. TRACT: (PER STEWART TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 01148- 42802, DATED APRIL 16, 2015) PARCEL A: LOT 1, CITY OF TUKWILA SHORT PLAT NO. L06 -091, ACCORDING TO THE SHORT PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MARCH 30, 2007 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 2007033090004, AND AMENDMENT THERETO RECORDED FEBRUARY 19, 2009 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20090219900002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. PARCEL B: A NON - EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR PARKING PURPOSES AND ACCESS THERETO, AS RESERVED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDS JUNE 14, 2002 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20020614001446, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, .WASHINGTON. 57 —J —IJ 004000 - 0205 -ROW. DOCX Page 1 of 1 KPG TACOMA- SFATTLE 13 NW 1/4, SEC. 22, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. _ S 144TH ST S 87'3501" E EXISTING RIGHT WA OF Y 5- 87 35'01 ° E o - N C) EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 131.72' 131.72' 0 ' RIGHT OF WAY ' AREA = 1317 S.F.t TAX LOT NUMBER 00400 -0198 TAX LOT NUMBER 00400 -0205 ' TAX LOT NUMBER 00400 -0210 N.T.S. DATE: MAY 4, 2015 FILE: 004000- 0205.DWG EXHIBIT B 7539hAveN 2101IIIersanAve PARCEL 00400 -0205 Sege, WA 98109 Tecoma,WA9B402 (208)286,640 (253) 627 -0720 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION ww.4. 14 EXHIBIT C PARCEL NO. 004000 -0215 RIGHT OF WA Y ACOUISITION THE NORTH TEN FEET OF THE WEST 29.00 FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL 'A': CONTAINING 290 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 'A ". (PER STEWART TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 01148- 42804, DATED APRIL 21; 2015) THE WEST 36.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 155.00 FEET OF LOT 18 AND THE EASTERL Y29.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 155.00 FEET OF LOT 17, BLOCK 2, ADAMS HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. 57-5-/5 00400070215 -ROW DOCX Page 1 of 1 KPG TACOMA- SIIAT ME 15 NW 1/4, SEC. 22, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. _ S 144TH ST S 87'35'01" E EXISTING RIGHT OF WAy �— IWAY — o N Of 29.00' EXISTING RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY ° AREA = 290 S.F.t TAX LOT NUMBER 004000 -0210 TAX LOT NUMBER 004000 -0220 TAX LOT NUMBER 004000 -0215 N.T.S. DATE: MAY 4, 2015 FILE: 004000- 0215.DWG EXHIBIT C 753MA -N 2112119monAve PARCEL 004000 -0215 Sed WA98109 Ta.,WA9MO2 WE,2as,san (253) 0.07M RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION wm 16 EXHIBIT D PARCEL NO. 004000 -0210 RIGHT OF WAY ACOUISITION THE NORTH TEN FEET OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL "A ". CONTAINING 997 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL "A (PER STEWART TITLE COMPANY ORDER NO. 01148- 42803, DATED APRIL 22, 2015) LOT 17, EXCEPT THE EAST 29 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF THEREOF; AND THE WEST 17.70 FEET OF THE SOUTH 60 FEET OF LOT 18, AND THE WEST 17.70 FEET OF THE NORTH 10 FEET OF LOT 19; ALL IN BLOCK2, ADAMS HOME TRACTS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 11 OF PLATS, PAGE 31, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ALSO BEING KNOWN AS PARCEL A OF CITY OF TUKWILA BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. L96 -0056, RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1996 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 9611141476. 004000 - 0210 -ROW. DOCX Page 1 of 1 KPG TACOMA- SEATTLE 17 iu NW 1/4, SEC. 22, T. 23 N., R. 4 E., W.M. S 144TH ST S 87'35'01" E EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY i o � N O 99.70 EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 99.70' i o oa RIGHT OF WAY AREA = 997 S.F.t TAX LOT NUMBER , 004000 -0205 , TAX LOT NUMBER 004000 -0210 TAX LOT NUMBER 004000 -0215 N. T. S. DATE: MAY 4, 2015 FILE: 004000- 0210.DWG 4cm,a EXHIBIT D MOM" 2��e"oke PARCEL 004000 -0210 smie,WAV09 T� ,WA98402 (206) 288,64U (253)62, -07M RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION iu Transportation Committee Minutes August 17, 2015- Pape 2 C. Supplemental Agreement: South 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Avenue South to TIB) Staff is requesting Council approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $27,239.99 to complete right -of -way acquisition services for the South 144th Street Phase II Project. Right of Way is needed from 4 parcels to accommodate the current design, and this proposed agreement will authorize the consultant to make the initial offers, negotiate with property owners, and execute the necessary paperwork. A budget amendment will be presented later in the year to update the project costs and will likely include updated impact fee collections. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO AUGUST 24, 2015 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. D. Right -of -Way Ordinance: South 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Avenue South to TIB) Staff is requesting Council approval of an ordinance that would authorize the acquisition of property from four parcels for right -of -way requirements of the South 144th Street Phase II Project. Two of these are unused residential properties and the other two are owned by the King County Library System and King County Housing Authority. The City will work cooperatively with the property owners and this ordinance will only be used in the event that negotiations are unsuccessful. The property owners have been notified of the potential for condemnation and the schedule for ordinance approval. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO AUGUST 24, 2015 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. III. SCATBd The August meeting was cancelled. IV. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Ekberg requested an update on the status of the installation of the new signs discussed at the July 6, 2015 Committee meeting. The work order was initiated today. Councilmember Ekberg passed on public comment regarding the difficulty that trucks exiting 1 -5 at Interurban Avenue South have navigating the right turn onto 48th Avenue South. It was suggested that the painted white stop line for southwest -bound traffic be pushed back several feet to make more room. Staff noted that that may pose problems for the traffic signal motion detection loops under the pavement. Councilmember Ekberg passed on public comment regarding motorcycles and motorbikes using the pedestrian bridge in Allentown. Improvements will be underway in 2015 and the City should consider bollards, signage, or any other deterrent that is reasonable. Meeting adjourned at 5:57 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, September 8, 2015 m , 'O �, Committee Chair Approval Minu s by LH, Reviewed by GL W 20 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS nitials Meeting Date Prepared bT Mayor's revie Council review 08/24/15 BG° ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date 09/08/15 BG SPONSOR'S Contract No. 14 -103 with KPG provided design services for the South 144th St Phase II SUMMARY street improvement project. Due to additional right -of -way needed, KPG will need to continue to provide preliminary engineering services. The right -of -way and construction budget will cover KPG's Supplemental Agreement No. 2. Council is being asked to approve KPG's Supplement No. 2 for $27,239.99, bringing the entire contract to $345,153.97. REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte ❑ F &S Cmte ® Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 08/17/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOE DUFFIE RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works Department COMMFITEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $27,239.99 $1,607,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 15, 2015 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 08/24/15 09/08/15 ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. 21 STAFF SPONSOR: BOB GIBERSON ORI ;INAL AGL'NDA DATF,: 08/24/15 AGENDA ITEM TITLE S 144th St Phase II Project (42nd Ave S - Tukwila Int'I Blvd) Right -of -Way Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with KPG, Inc. CATEGORY ® Discussion Mtg Date 08124115 ® Motion Mtg Date 09108115 ❑ Resolution Mtg Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑ Bid Award Mtg Date ❑ Public Hearing Mtg Date ❑Other Mtg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ HR ❑ DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P &R ❑ Police ® PW' SPONSOR'S Contract No. 14 -103 with KPG provided design services for the South 144th St Phase II SUMMARY street improvement project. Due to additional right -of -way needed, KPG will need to continue to provide preliminary engineering services. The right -of -way and construction budget will cover KPG's Supplemental Agreement No. 2. Council is being asked to approve KPG's Supplement No. 2 for $27,239.99, bringing the entire contract to $345,153.97. REVIEWED BY ❑ COW Mtg. ❑ CA &P Cmte ❑ F &S Cmte ® Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 08/17/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: JOE DUFFIE RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Public Works Department COMMFITEE Unanimous Approval; Forward to Committee of the Whole COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $27,239.99 $1,607,000.00 $0.00 Fund Source: 104 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (PAGE 15, 2015 CIP) Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 08/24/15 09/08/15 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 08/24/15 Informational Memorandum dated 08/14/15 Page 15, 2015 CIP KPG Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Contract No. 14 -103 Minutes from the Transportation Committee meeting of 08/17/15 09/08/15 21 22 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Transportation Committee FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director .* BY: Cyndy Knighton, Senior Program Manager DATE: August 14, 2015 SUBJECT: S 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Ave S to Tukwila International Blvd) Project No. 99510402, Contract No. 14 -103 Supplemental Agreement No. 2 for ROW Acquisition Services ISSUE Execute a supplemental agreement with KPG in the amount not to exceed $27,239.99 to complete right -of -way (ROW) acquisition services for the S 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Avenue S to Tukwila International Boulevard). BACKGROUND In May 2015, the design contract with KPG was supplemented by the amount of $20,000 to begin acquiring ROW for the S 144th St Phase II Project. ROW is needed from 4 parcels to accommodate the current design features. Legal descriptions were developed and Administrative Offer Summaries were prepared for each parcel, as well as a Project Funding Estimate to best estimate the remaining ROW costs. DISCUSSION KPG's ROW Supplemental Agreement No, 1 was limited to gathering property information, establishing values of property to be acquired, and developing a Project Funding Estimate. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 will authorize the consultant team to make the initial offers, negotiate with the property owners and execute all of the necessary paperwork associated with ROW acquisition. KPG's Supplemental Agreement No. 2 for an additional $27,239.99 will accomplish all of the required ROW tasks. FINANCIAL IMPACT The current CIP budget for ROW is $40,000, of which $20,000 has been expended under KPG's Supplemental Agreement No. 1. Supplemental Agreement No. 2 will use the remaining $20,000 from the ROW budget and staff is proposing the use of $7,239.99 from the construction budget. A budget amendment will be brought forward later this year to update the project costs in the Capital Improvement Program. Once the final ROW purchase prices have been negotiated (currently estimated to be $82K), staff will propose the use of construction funds to acquire the necessary property, if a budget amendment has not yet been made. The budget amendment will likely include updated impact fee collections to supplement the project budget. The King County Library System and the Tukwila Village site will be assessed traffic impact fees once building permits have been issued. RECOMMENDATION Council is being asked to approve KPG's Supplemental Agreement No. 2 in the amount of $27,239.99 to complete ROW acquisition services for the S 144th Street Phase II Project and consider this item at the August 24, 2015 Committee of the Whole and subsequent September 8, 2015 Regular Meeting. Attachments: 2015 CIP Page 15 Consultant Supplemental Agreement No. 2 W.1PW EngTROJECTSIA- RW & RS ProjecWS 144th St Phase II TIB - 42nd Ave S (99510402 95- RW02)0esigMROW11NFO MEMO KPG Supp #2 ROW gl - sb -r gl.docx 23 24 CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY 2015 to 2020 PROJECT: S 144 St Phase II (42 Ave S - Tukwila Int'I Blvd) * Project No. 99510402 zone 3 Construct curb, gutter, sidewalk, bike lanes, pavement restoration, illumination, drainage and utility DESCRIPTION: undergrounding from Tukwila Int'I Blvd to 42nd Ave S. Also add a signal at 42nd Ave S. JUSTIFICATION: Provide pedestrian and vehicle safety, drainage and neighborhood revitalization. Phase I - Tukwila Int'I Blvd to Military Rd, project completed in 2007 for $3.1 million with $1 million in grants. STATUS: Phase II - 42 Ave S to Tukwila International Blvd. MAINT. IMPACT: Reduce pavement, drainage repairs, and maintenance costs. 25 Awarded Transportation Improvement Board's Arterial Improvement Program (AIP) grant of $1 million. COMMENT: Project is on Impact Fee list. Design and construction related to the Tukwila Village project. FINANCIAL Through Estimated (in $000's) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 BEYOND TOTAL EXPENSES Design 286 25 311 Land(R/W) 40 40 Const. Mgmt. 180 180 Construction 1,402 1,402 TOTAL EXPENSES 1 0 326 1 1,607 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1,933 FUND SOURCES Awarded Grant 180 820 1,000 Proposed Grant 0 Proposed Mitigation 100 700 800 Traffic Impact Fees 133 13 25 171 City Oper. Revenue (133) 33 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 (38) TOTAL SOURCES 0 326 1,607 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,933 2015 - 2020 Capital Improvement Program 15 25 26 SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT No. 2 AGREEMENT NO. 14 -103 PROJECT N0.99510402 City of Tukwila KPG, Inc. Public Works Department 753-- 9th Avenue N. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100 Seattle, WA 98109 Tukwila, WA 98188 PROJECT: S 144th Street Phase H Project - ROW Negotiation Services This SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO. 2 is to supplement the agreement entered into with KPG, Inc. and the City of Tukwila, which was executed on the 29th day of July, 2014. All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect, except as expressly modified as follows: Article 2, Scope of Services, shall be supplemented with the following: The Consultant agrees to provide right of way services in accordance with the scope of work included as Exhibit A -2. Article 4, Payment, shall be modified as follows: A. Payment for work provided by Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit B -2, attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant for this work not exceed $27,239.99 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. The new total contract shall not exceed $345,153.97 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this day of , 2015. APPROVED: CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton Mayor Attested: Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk APPROVED: KPG, INC. Nelson Davis, P.E. Principal 27 Exhibit A -2 City of Tukwila S 144th Street Phase II Project 42 "d Avenue S to Tukwila International Boulevard Supplement No. 2 — Right of Way Negotiation Services KPG Scope of Work July 27, 2015 PURPOSE: Following completion of base maps and completion of 50% design for S 144th Street, it was determined that additional right of way is necessary to complete the improvements. Valuation and legal descriptions were prepared under supplement no. 1 to this Contract. This supplement is provided to support negotiations for partial right of way takes on four (4) parcels in support of the S 144th Street Phase II Project. SCOPE OF WORK: Task 8 Right of Way Calculations 8.6 Support acquisition services to be performed by Abeyta & Associates under subcontract to the Consultant in accordance to state guidelines. The overall objectives are: 1. Negotiate for the partial acquisitions from 4 parcels for the completion of the proposed roadway improvements. 2. Assist the City of Tukwila with the acquisition process and preparation of forms. A specific list of Performance Objectives is outlined in the following paragraphs. SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES The key objectives of this proposal are: Acquisitions: 1. Inspect and prepare a Preliminary Acquisition Report for each parcel. 2. Identify fee interest ownership for 4 parcels. City of Tukwila S 144"' St Phase 11 Project Page 1 of 3 KPG 7/27/2015 Exhibit A -2 3. Prepare and setup acquisition files for 4 parcels. 4. Prepare acquisition forms needed to obtain property rights. This proposal does not include the preparation of Possession and Use agreements. 5. Negotiate to acquire in fee title and easements from 4 Parcels - A minimum of 3 attempts for each parcel. 6. Maintain diaries for 4 parcels. 7. Assist in clearing title encumbrances that will adversely impact the rights being acquired. 8. Assist in delivering funds to each property owner. 9. Deliver completed files to the City of Tukwila. PROJECT SCOPE EXCLUSIONS 1. Those services related to obtaining releases of encumbrances from title, which require legal action; 2. The actual filing of condemnation and subsequent litigation; 3. Certain dosing costs such as transfer taxes, title reports, recording fees, penalty costs for pre payments cost of a pre- existing mortgage, partial reconveyance fees, the pro rate share of real property taxes paid subsequent to vesting title to the City; 4. Relocation Services; 5. Continuing negotiations for those parcels listed for condemnation; 6. Appraisal services City of Tukwila S 144th St Phase 11 Project Page 2 of 3 KPG 7/27/2015 29 Exhibit A -2 Additional Services The City may require additional services of the Consultant in order to advance all or portions of the project corridor through final design and construction. This work may include items identified in the current task authorizations as well other items, which may include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: • Condemnation support • Providing additional permitting or environmental studies • Providing construction services These services will be authorized under a future contract supplement if necessary. At the time these services are required, the Consultant shall provide a detailed scope of work and an estimate of costs. The Consultant shall not proceed with the work until the City has authorized the work and issued a notice to proceed. City of Tukwila S 144th St Phase 11 Project 30 Page 3 of 3 KPG 7/27/2015 HOUR AND FEE ESTIMATE Project: City of Tukwila S 144th Street Phase II 42nd Avenue S to Tukwila International Boulevard Supplement No. 2 - ROW Negotiation Services EXHIBIT B -2 KPG ♦ Architecture • Landscape Architecture • Civil Engineering • Task 8 - Right of Way Calculations and Acquisitions 8.6 Negotiation support Subconsultant - Abeyta Mileage Reproduction Task Total 4 8 8 0 0 8 0 0 4 3,774.99 23,365.00 50.00 $ 50.00 Hourly rates are based on the following: D irect Salary Costs Overhead Rate Fixed Fee 65.00 $ 52.06 41.83 7/27/2015 27,239.99 Total Estimated Fee: $ 27,239.99 45.67 $ 36.06 '; $ 31.25 $ 50.75 $ 40.87 j $ 26.92 145.78% 30% Totals $ 1,368.84 $ 1,995.50 $ 410.65 City of Tukwila PROJECT FUNDING ESTIMATE Project: S 144th Street Improvements Phase II Federal Aid No.: N/A Date: June 7, 2015 1 2 3 4 5 Estimate 1 Appraisal, if Requested by Property Owners: 6 7 8 $ 7,447.60 9 Estimate 1 Condemnation: 10 1 11 Parcel Number Just Compensation (Offer) Statutory Reimbursement Fee Appraisal Fee Appraisal Review Fee AOS /PFE Negotiation Services Closing Cost Relocation Service Litigation Fees Total Parcel Costs 004000 -0205 1 $ 23,202.001 $ 750.00 $ - 1 $ - I $ 2,150.001 $ 7,430.00 $ 825.001 $ - I $ - 1 $ 34,357.00 152304 -9013 3,431.001 $ 750.001 $ 2,150.00 $ 7,430.001 $ 825.001 $ 14,586.00 004000 -0215 1 $ 3,068.001 $ 750.001 $ -I $ -I$ 2,150.001 $ 7,430.001 $ 825.001 $ -I $ 14,223.00 004000 -0210 1 $ 7,537.001 $ 750.001 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ 2,150.001 $ 7,530.001 $ 825.001 $ - 1 $ -' $ 18,792.00 Sub- Total l $ 37,238.00 1 $ 3,000.00 1 $ - 1 $ - 1 $ 8,600.00 1 $ 29,820.001 $ 3,300.00 1 $ - I $ - 1 $ 81,958.00 Contingency Costs Estimate 1 Appraisal, if Requested by Property Owners: $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 Administrtive Settlement (25% of Just Compensation): $ 7,447.60 $ 7,447.60 Estimate 1 Condemnation: $ 185,000.00 $ 185,000.00 Total $ 277,905.60 6/7/2015 Abeyta Associates Transportation Committee Minutes August 17, 2015- Pape 2 C. Supplemental Agreement: South 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Avenue South to TIB) Staff is requesting Council approval of Supplemental Agreement No. 2 with KPG, Inc. in the amount of $27,239.99 to complete right -of -way acquisition services for the South 144th Street Phase II Project. Right of Way is needed from 4 parcels to accommodate the current design, and this proposed agreement will authorize the consultant to make the initial offers, negotiate with property owners, and execute the necessary paperwork. A budget amendment will be presented later in the year to update the project costs and will likely include updated impact fee collections. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO AUGUST 24, 2015 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. D. Right -of -Way Ordinance: South 144th Street Phase II Project (42nd Avenue South to TIB) Staff is requesting Council approval of an ordinance that would authorize the acquisition of property from four parcels for right -of -way requirements of the South 144th Street Phase II Project. Two of these are unused residential properties and the other two are owned by the King County Library System and King County Housing Authority. The City will work cooperatively with the property owners and this ordinance will only be used in the event that negotiations are unsuccessful. The property owners have been notified of the potential for condemnation and the schedule for ordinance approval. UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. FORWARD TO AUGUST 24, 2015 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. III. SCATBd The August meeting was cancelled. IV. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Ekberg requested an update on the status of the installation of the new signs discussed at the July 6, 2015 Committee meeting. The work order was initiated today. Councilmember Ekberg passed on public comment regarding the difficulty that trucks exiting 1 -5 at Interurban Avenue South have navigating the right turn onto 48th Avenue South. It was suggested that the painted white stop line for southwest -bound traffic be pushed back several feet to make more room. Staff noted that that may pose problems for the traffic signal motion detection loops under the pavement. Councilmember Ekberg passed on public comment regarding motorcycles and motorbikes using the pedestrian bridge in Allentown. Improvements will be underway in 2015 and the City should consider bollards, signage, or any other deterrent that is reasonable. Meeting adjourned at 5:57 p.m. Next meeting: Monday, September 8, 2015 m , 'O �, Committee Chair Approval Minu s by LH, Reviewed by GL 33 34 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS Initials Meelin ,g Date Prepared by Mayor's re!ie Council review 08/24/15 DCS W4 ITEM INFORMATION ITEMNO. 4.C. & Spec 2.B. I 35 STAFF SPONSOR: DEREK SPECK ORIGINALAGENDADATE: 8/24/15 AGENDA ITI.,"m Trns�', Consulting services contracts for proposed arena CATI.-GORY Z Discussion Mtg Dale 8124119 z Motion Mtg Date 8124119 ❑ Resolution Mt Date ❑ Ordinance Mtg Date ❑.BidAward Mtg Date ❑ Public.Hearin g Mtg Date ❑ Otber Mtg Date SPONSOR ❑ Council Z Ma 'yor EI.HR E]DCD D.Finance E].Fire E]IT E],P&R ❑ Police ❑ PWI SPONSOR'S The Council is being asked to consider and approve the amendments to consulting services SUMMARY agreements related to analysis of the proposed arena. REVIEWED BY ❑ cow Mtg- ❑ CA&P Cmte Z F&S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte F-1 Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: 8/18/15 COMMITTEE CHAIR: HOUGARDY RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONsoR/ADMIN. Mayor's Office COMMI'17EE Unanimous Approval; Forward to C.O.W. & Special Mtg. Consent 8/24 COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED $290,000 $ $ Fund Source: GENERAL FUND Comments.- No net cost to City, The full amount will be reimbursed by the arena developer. MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 8/24/15 MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 8/24/15 Informational Memorandum dated 8/12/15 Five contracts with proposed amendments Minutes from the Finance and Safety Committee meeting of 8/18/15 35 W City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Finance and Safety Committee FROM: Derek Speck, Economic Development Administrator DATE: August 12, 2015 SUBJECT: Consulting Contracts for Proposed Arena ISSUE Staff requests Council approval for consulting contracts related to the proposed arena. BACKGROUND In May 2015 RLB Holdings Sports and Entertainment, LLC submitted an application for State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review for permits and approvals necessary to construct a multi - purpose sports and entertainment arena in Tukwila. The City of Tukwila has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared. As is typical for environmental reviews and projects of this nature, staff contracted with consultants to assist with technical analyses and project management. Similar to what occurs in other large projects, these costs will be paid by the developer. Staff would like to amend some of those contracts to expand their scope to carry the project work through the EIS period and the end of this year. Staff requests Council approval for those contract amendments that exceed the Administration's approval authority. As information, the table below also includes two contracts that are still within the Administration's approval authority but are shown here in order to give Council context for all the contracts related to the arena at this time. Contract Maximum Amount Firm Purpose Current Proposed 15 -059 Daley Morrow Poblete, 1 nc. Water, sewer, stormwater analysis $20,000 $50,000 15 -078 Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions EIS review $35,000 $75,000 15 -084 Fehr & Peers Traffic analysis $20,000 $40,000 15 -107 Shiels Obletz Johnsen Project management $35,000 $100,000 15 -127 Fehr & Peers Parking analysis $12,500 $25,000 15 -080 Walker Macy Architectural design review $10,000 $10,000 To be determined Transit analysis $0 $20,000 Total $132,500 $320,000 There are a few items that are important to note: (1) These contracts are revenue neutral to the City because the arena developer and City will enter into an agreement in which the developer will reimburse the City for these 37 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 costs. Since the reimbursement agreement relates to the City receiving revenue and does not authorize expenditures, it does not require Council approval. The arena developer has reviewed the draft reimbursement agreement and indicated their concurrence. (2) The contract amounts shown are maximum "not to exceed" limits. Most of the contracts are based on actual time and materials and the full amount may not be spent. (3) As the arena project progresses, it's possible that other contracts will be necessary. DISCUSSION The Daley Morrow Poblete contract provides technical analysis of the arena's effects on the city's water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater capacity and infrastructure. The Skinner Planning and Environmental Review contract will provide for the assistance of Lloyd Skinner who is reviewing the EIS and performing other planning work related to the arena. The two Fehr & Peers contracts are for different scopes of work that fall within Administration's approval authority, however, staff seeks Council approval since, when combined, they exceed Administration's approval limits and we would like to avoid any misperceptions. One of the contracts is to analyze the proposed parking for the arena and the other contract is to analyze the traffic impacts. The Shiels Obletz Johnsen contract provides for Ken Johnsen to serve as the City's project manager for the arena. The five contracts are currently in effect. Staff is requesting Council approval of amendments to increase the maximum compensation in the agreements. The contracts with proposed amendments are attached. FINANCIAL IMPACT There is no financial impact to the City because the cost of the contracts will be reimbursed by the arena developer. Although the contracts are revenue neutral, budget amendments may be necessary later this year to show increases in revenues and expenditures. RECOMMENDATION The Council is being asked to approve five proposed contract amendments and consider this item at the August 24, 2015 Committee of the Whole meeting, with potential approval at the Consent Agenda of the Special Meeting to follow that same evening. The timing of the project would benefit from the approval of these contracts in August. ATTACHMENTS (1) Contract 15 -059 Daley Morrow Poblete, Inc. with amendment #1 (2) Contract 15 -078 Skinner Planning and Environmental Review with amendment #2 (3) Contract 15 -084 Fehr & Peers (for traffic analysis) with amendment #1 (4) Contract 15 -107 Shiels Obletz Johnsen with amendment #1 (5) Contract 15 -127 Fehr & Peers (for parking analysis) with amendment #1 38 WA2015 Info Memos\Arena Contracts Memo.doc Attachment #1 Contract 15 -059 Daley Morrow Poblete, Inc. with amendment #1 40 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #1 Between the City of Tukwila and Daley- Morrow - Poblete, Inc. That portion of Contract No. 15 -059 between the City of Tukwila and Daley- Morrow - Poblete, Inc. is amended as follows: Section 3: Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2015 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City as authorized by the Mayor. Section 4: The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B -1" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed 50,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. Exhibits A and B are hereby amended and restated as attached hereto as Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B- 1. All references to Exhibit A and Exhibit B in contract 15 -059 shall be read as referring to Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B -1, respectively. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of August, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor Daley- Morrow- Poblete, Inc. Amendment #1 CONSULTANT Alex Poblete, P.E., Vice - President Page 1 of 3 41 Contract 15 -059 Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work On call civil engineering consulting services, as requested by the City of Tukwila, will include but not be limited to: • Development plan review for compliance with City code and development standards • Construction support • Attending meetings as requested • Other planning and engineering services as agreed to by the parties Any request for services not listed above shall be agreed upon by the City and the Consultant prior to performance of said services. Daley- Morrow - Poblete, Inc. Amendment #1 Page 2 of 3 42 Contract 15 -059 Exhibit B -1 Payment Payment for pre- approved on -call work will not exceed the budget list in Section 4.A without an approved amendment to the agreement. Payment will be based on invoices supporting hours worked based on the following fee schedule: STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE 2015 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER $120.00 PER HOUR PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR $110.00 PER HOUR EXPERT WITNESS $200.00 PER HOUR PROJECT MANAGER $100.00 PER HOUR DESIGN ENGINEER $ 95.00 PER HOUR PLANNER $100.00 PER HOUR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN $ 90.00 PER HOUR CADD TECHNICIAN $ 85.00 PER HOUR CADD DRAFTER $ 80.00 PER HOUR SURVEY TECHNICIAN $ 90.00 PER HOUR OFFICE SURVEY COMPUTATIONS $ 90.00 PER HOUR SECRETARIAL STAFF $ 50.00 PER HOUR 2 -MAN SURVEY CREW $130.00 PER HOUR 3 -MAN SURVEY CREW $160.00 PER HOUR DIRECT EXPENSE CHARGES INVOICED COSTS TO DMP, INC. — PLUS 15% (Long Distance Calls, Reproductions, miscellaneous materials, sub - consultants, etc.) OVER TIME — Charges at 1.5 times the hourly rate charge listed above. REPRODUCTIONS - CADD Plats $7.50 per L.F. (Mylar), plus hourly rate $6.00 per L.F. (Vellum), plus hourly rate Xerox Plans $3.00 per sheet (Paper), plus hourly rate $15.00 per sheet (Mylar), plus hourly rate COPIES - 24X36 $3.00 per page, plus hourly rate 18X24 $2.00 per page, plus hourly rate Color 8.5x 11 $1.25 per page, plus hourly rate B/W 8.5x 11 $ .10 per page, plus hourly rate CD's $75.00 each, plus hourly rate TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES - $0.65 Per Mile. Daley- Morrow - Poblete, Inc. Amendment #1 Page 3 of 3 43 44 15 -059 City Of Tukwila Contract Number: Council Approval N/A 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and Daley - Morrow - Poblete, Inc., a Washington corporation, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Proiect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform on -call engineering support services in connection with the project titled a N -Cq-u- e:SNG1iyJ96rR4 ✓C7 .511PPO t-!r 2. 4 Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending 17- / 3 ih s , unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than 111S' unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed f1 coi $ so without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 29 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: CA revised: 1 -2013 M 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 2 Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01, and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised: 1 -2013 Page 3 47 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event-any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised: 1 -2013 W Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: Public Works Department City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Daley- Morrow - Poblete, Inc. 726 Auburn Way N Auburn, WA 98002 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this CITY OF TUKWILA �3rOk day of Gl- &as GIOEM SoN� P(15 1r- Watjmr D e 1-c- c.Ta/R CA revised: 1 -2013 CONSULTANT By: 2A . Printed Name: Alex Poblete P.E. Title: Vice - President Page 5 i • ON -CALL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES EXHIBIT A & B SCOPE OF WORK On -call civil engineering consulting services, as requested by the City of Tukwila, will include, but not be limited to: • Development plan review for compliance with City code and development standards • Construction support • Attending meetings as requested • Other planning and engineering services as agreed to by the parties Any request for services not listed above shall be agreed upon by the City and the Consultant prior to performance of said services. PAYMENT Payment for pre- approved on -call work will not exceed the budget listed in Section 4.A. without an approved amendment to the agreement. Payment will be based on invoices supporting hours worked based on the following fee schedule: STANDARD FEE SCHEDULE 2015 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR EXPERT WITNESS PROJECT MANAGER 50 $120.00 PER HOUR $110.00 PER HOUR $200.00 PER HOUR $100.00 PER HOUR DESIGN ENGINEER $95.00 PER HOUR PLANNER $100.00 PER HOUR ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN $90.00 PER HOUR CADD TECHNICIAN $85.00 PER HOUR CADD DRAFTER $80.00 PER HOUR SURVEY TECHNICIAN $90.00 PER HOUR OFFICE SURVEY COMPUTATIONS $90.00 PER HOUR SECRETARIAL STAFF $50.00 PER HOUR 2 -MAN SURVEY CREW $130.00 PER HOUR 3 -MAN SURVEY CREW $160.00 PER HOUR DIRECT EXPENSE CHARGES: INVOICED COSTS TO DMP, INC. — PLUS 15% (Long Distance Calls, Reproductions, miscellaneous materials, sub - consultants, etc.) OVERTIME — Charges at 1.5 times the hourly charge rate. REPRODUCTIONS - CADD Plats - $7.50 per L.F. (Mylar), plus hourly rate $6.00 per L.F. (Vellum), plus hourly rate Xerox Plans - $3.00 per Sheet (Paper), plus hourly rate $15.00 per Sheet (Mylar), plus hourly rate COPIES: 24 X 36 $3.00 per page, plus hourly rate 18 X 24 $2.00 per page, plus hourly rate color 8 % X 11 $1.25 per page, plus hourly rate b/w 8 % X 11 $ .10 per page, plus hourly rate CD'S $75.00 each, plus hourly rate TRANSPORTATION EXPENSES - $0.65 Per Mile. 51 52 Attachment #2 Contract 15 -078 Skinner Planning and Environmental Review with amendment #2 53 54 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #2 Between the City of Tukwila and Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions That portion of Contract No. 15 -078 between the City of Tukwila and Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions is amended as follows: Section 3: Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2015 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City as authorized by the Mayor. Section 4: The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B -2" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $75,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. Exhibits A and B are hereby amended and restated as attached hereto as Exhibit A -2 and Exhibit B- 2. All references to Exhibit A and Exhibit B in contract 15 -078 shall be read as referring to Exhibit A -2 and Exhibit B -2, respectively. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of August, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor Skinner SEPA Contract Amendment #2 CONTRACTOR Lloyd Skinner, Principal Page 1 of 3 55 Contract 15 -078 Exhibit A -2 Scope of Work On -call consultant services as requested by the City of Tukwila including but not limited to: • Regulatory review, • Project level SEPA environmental analysis, and • EIS document preparation and review. Payment for pre- approved on -call work will not exceed the budget listed in section 4.A without an approved amendment to this agreement. Skinner SEPA Contract Amendment #2 Page 2 of 3 56 Contract 15 -078 Exhibit B -2 Payment Payment will be based on invoices reflecting hours worked at a fully burdened rate of $175/hour. Contractor will provide an estimate of the hours required for individual tasks prior to beginning work. Skinner SEPA Contract Amendment #2 Page 3 of 3 57 0101 City of Tukwila Contract Number: 15-078 Council Approval NIA • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL SEPA SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant", in consideration of the mutual' benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Project Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform on -call SEPA support services on an as- needed basis. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter speed. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2015 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $10,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be wade available upon request. �stcfC1 M 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: CA revised :1 -2013 •1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 2 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Indeuendent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised :1 -2013 Page 3 61 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised: 1 -2013 62 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: Lloyd Skinner Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions 3 S6# N j—: Ito (o S 7— 18. Entire Agreement: Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this �� day of April, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA CONSULTANT Jack P$e V City ofl�ukwila DCD Director Printed Name: Lloyd Skinner Title: 'L CA revised: 1 -2013 Page 5 63 Exhibit A Scope of Work On -call consultant services as requested by the City of Tukwila including but not limited to: • Regulatory review, • Project level SEPA environmental analysis, and • EIS document preparation and review. Payment for pre - approved on -call work will not exceed the budget listed in section 4. A without an approved amendment to this agreement. Exhibit B Payment Payment will be based on invoices reflecting hours worked at a fully burdened rate of $1 75/hour. Contractor will provide an estimate of the hours required for individual tasks prior to beginning work. CA revised :1 -2013 .� � Page 6 City f Tukwila Agreement Number: 15-078(a) y Council Approval N/A 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #1 Between the City of Tukwila and Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions That portion of Contract No. 15 -078 between the City of Tukwila and Skinner Planning and Environmental Solutions is amended as follows: Section 4• A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $35,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this .2 l s7 day of May, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA CA: 2012 CONTRACTOR Lloyd Sl4inner, Principal Page 1 of 1 Ag Exhibit B Payment Payment will be based on invoices reflecting hours worked at a fully burdened rate of $175/hour. Contractor will provide an estimate of the hours required for individual tasks prior to beginning work. .. Attachment #3 Contract 15 -084 Fehr & Peers (for traffic analysis) with amendment #1 67 r-F-P CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #1 Between the City of Tukwila and Fehr and Peers That portion of Contract No. 15 -084 between the City of Tukwila and Fehr & Peers is amended as follows: Section 3: Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2015 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City as authorized by the Mayor. Section 4: The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "13-1" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $40,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. Exhibits A and B are hereby amended and restated as attached hereto as Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B- l. All references to Exhibit A and Exhibit B in contract 15 -084 shall be read as referring to Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B -1, respectively. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of August, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor Fehr & Peers Traffic Study Amendment #1 CONSULTANT Chris Breiland, Principal Page 1 of 3 •• Contract 15 -084 Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work Fehr & Peers will complete the following Scope of Work to peer review for the traffic study assumptions /results, model data, mitigation strategies, comment letters and related documents being prepared by the Northwest Arena applicants • Task 1 — Review studies, model results, mitigation strategies, etc. prepared by the applicant's consultants • Task 2 — Summaries our review and potential implications to the City of Tukwila transportation facilities • Task 3 — Provide recommended changes or submit comments directly to applicant's consultants All work performed under this agreement will be executed swiftly as we understand that time is of the essence. Fehr & Peers Traffic Study Amendment #1 Page 2 of 3 70 Contract 15 -084 Exhibit B -1 Payment Based on the scope of work in Exhibit A -1 invoices will be billed on a time and materials basis based on the following hourly rates: Principal: $240 Project Engineer/Planner: $105 -$135 Administrative: $95 Fehr & Peers Traffic Study Amendment #1 Page 3 of 3 71 72 City of Tukwila Contract Number: 15 -084 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Council Approval N/A CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR ON -CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and Fehr & Peers , hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Proiect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to. perform On -Call Traffic Engineering Support Services. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2016, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2016 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $20,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. 0-:C1 c ,,AuAL -S 73 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: CA revised : 1 -2013 74 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 2 2.: Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than ANII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised: 1 -2013 Page 3 75 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised :1 -2013 76 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall be sent to the following address: G.hr:S Ar-e; WA Q toodt qfk A&,-, sle, 4{Zo SN We wit TK ts� 18. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this I V, t' day of ADALkj , 20J CITY OF TUKWILA Bob Giberson, Public Works Director CA revised: 1 -2013 CONSULTANT Printed Name: ap"s -&e I C')V9 Title: J'T !nG. [ a Page 5 77 FEHRtPEERS April 2, 2015 Bob Giberson, PE Public Works Director City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Review of Large Development Traffic Studies and Related Documents Dear Mr. Giberson: Fehr & Peers understands that Tukwila would like to have us review traffic study assumptions/results, model data, mitigation strategies, comment letters, and related documents for a proposed large development that is undergoing environmental review. Our work will be performed on a time and materials basis and our initial budget will be set at $20,000. Given the on -call nature of this work, it is difficult to define a precise scope of work, but a general outline is provided below. • Task 1 — Review studies, model results, mitigation strategies, etc. prepared by the applicant's consultants • Task 2 — Summarize our review and potential implications to City of Tukwila transportation facilities • Task 3 — Provide recommended changes or submit comments directly to applicant's consultants All work performed under this agreement will be executed swiftly, as we understand that time is of the essence. This letter serves at Exhibit A and B. as referenced in the City's Consultant Agreement. Sincerely, FEHR & PEERS 04Z;;I Chris Breiland, PE Principal Attachments: Scope of Work, Budget 10014th Avenue, Suite 4120, Seattle WA 98154 (206) 576 -4220 Fax(206)576-4225 www.fehrandpeemcom Attachment #4 Contract 15 -107 Shiels Obletz Johnsen with amendment #1 79 :1 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #1 Between the City of Tukwila and Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. That portion of Contract No. 15 -107 between the City of Tukwila and Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. is amended as follows: 1. Scope and Schedule of Services to be Performed by Contractor. The Contractor shall perform those services described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. In performing such services, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the performance of such services and the handling of any funds used in connection therewith. The Contractor shall request and obtain prior written approval from the City if the scope or schedule is to be modified in any way. 2. Compensation and Method of Payment. The City shall pay the Contractor for services rendered at a rate of $270.00 per hour. The total amount to be paid shall not exceed $100,000. 4. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing May 15, 2015, and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City as authorized by the Mayor. Exhibit A is hereby amended and restated as attached hereto as Exhibit A -1. All references to Exhibit A in contract 15 -107 shall be read as referring to Exhibit A -1. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of August, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. Amendment #1 CONTRACTOR Ken Johnsen, Executive Vice President Page 1 of 2 Contract 15 -107 Exhibit A -1 Scope of Services Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. (SOJ) NW Arena Project Under the direction of the City Administrator, SOJ will provide project management services for the City's involvement on the NW Arena Project. These services will include: A. Ongoing advice to the City Administrator on how to organize City staff and consultant services. B. Manage the City's team working on the project, including: — Leading regular City team meetings — Maintaining a project schedule for City tasks — Coordinating City's outreach/communications regarding the project — Advising the City Administrator regarding the need for City team resources C. Manage communications with RLB Holdings, including regular meetings with RLB. D. Work with the City team to carry out the City's project review including: — Environmental review — Street vacation — Development agreement with RLB — Building permits E. Identify areas where work with other entities, such as King County Metro, Sound Transit, Puget Sound Energy is necessary. Develop a strategy and a work plan for carrying out that work. F. Prepare a work program outline for on -going City work on NW Arena Project. SOJ will carry out this work on a time and materials basis. SOJ employees will bill for work based on established hourly rates. Any direct costs, such as travel, will be billed at cost. Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. Amendment #1 Page 2 of 2 82 City of Tukwila Contract Number: 15 -107 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 Council Approval N/A CONTRACT FOR SEIkVICES This Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Tukwila, Washington, a non - charter optional municipal code city hereinafter referred to as "the City," and Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "the Contractor," whose principal office is located at 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4130, Seattle WA 98104. WHEREAS, the City has determined the need to have certain services performed for its citizens but does not have the manpower or expertise to perform such services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Contractor perform such services pursuant to certain terms and conditions; now, therefore, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual benefits and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope and Schedule of Services to be Performed by Contractor. The Contractor shall perform those services described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth. In performing such services, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all Federal, State, and local statutes, rules and ordinances applicable to the performance of such services and the handling of any funds used in connection therewith. The Contractor shall request and obtain prior written approval from the City if the scope or schedule is to be modified in any way. 2. Compensation and Method of Payment. The City shall pay the Contractor for services rendered according to the rate and method set forth on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The total amount to be paid shall not exceed $35,000 at a rate of $270/hr. 3. Contractor Budget. The Contractor shall apply the funds received under this Agreement within the maximum limits set forth in this Agreement. The Contractor shall request prior approval from the City whenever the Contractor desires to amend its budget in any way. 4. Duration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing May 15, 2015, and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. 5. Independent Contractor. Contractor and City agree that Contractor is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither Contractor nor any employee of Contractor shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or contributing to the State Industrial Insurance Program, or otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Contractor, or any employee of the Contractor. Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. 5+ of Z Or)' 31 A Q LS Page 1 of 5 F; 1 6. Indemnification. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, agents, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Contractor's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 7. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. Page 2 of 5 0 therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 8. Record Keeping and Reporting. A. The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property, financial and programmatic records which sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and services performed in the performance of this Agreement and other such records as may be deemed necessary by the City to ensure the performance of this Agreement. B. These records shall be maintained for a period of seven (7) years after termination hereof unless permission to destroy them is granted by the office of the archivist in accordance with RCW Chapter 40.14 and by the City. 9. Audits and Inspections. The records and documents with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement shall be subject at all times to inspection, review or audit by law during the performance of this Agreement. 10. Termination. This Agreement may at any time be terminated by the City giving to the Contractor thirty (30) days written notice of the City's intention to terminate the same. Failure to provide products on schedule may result in contract termination. If the Contractor's insurance coverage is canceled for any reason, the City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment and Subcontract. The Contractor shall not assign or subcontract any portion of the services contemplated by this Agreement without the written consent of the City. 13. Entire Agreement; Modification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Contractor and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or.modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. 14. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. 15. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk, City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, Washington 98188 Notices to the Contractor shall be sent to the address provided by the Contractor upon the signature line below. 16. Applicable Law; Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. Page 3 of 5 M. proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. DATED this ay of -92015. CITY OF TUKWILA 005- ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED: C12�� A2 -7141' City Clerk, Christy O'Flaherty APPROVED AS TO FORM: ffice of the City Attorney Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. M. CONTRACTOR By: en nse xe utive ce nt K Address: 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4130 Seattle WA 98104 Page 4 of 5 Exhibit A Scope of Services Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. (SOJ) NW Arena Project Under the direction of the City Administrator, SOJ will provide project management services for the City's involvement on the NW Arena Project. These services will include: A. Ongoing advice to the City Administrator on how to organize City staff and consultant services. B. Manage the City's team working on the project, including: — Leading regular City team meetings — Maintaining a project schedule for City tasks Coordinating City's outreach/communications regarding the project Advising the City Administrator regarding the need for City team resources C. Manage communications with RLB Holdings, including regular meetings with RLB. D. Work with the City team to carry out the City's project review including: — Environmental review — Street vacation — Development agreement with RLB — Building permits E. Identify areas where work with other entities, such as King County Metro, Sound Transit, Puget Sound Energy is necessary. Develop a strategy and a work plan for carrying out that work. F. Prepare a work program outline for on -going City work on NW Arena Project. SOJ will carry out this work on a time and materials basis. SOJ employees will bill for work based on established hourly rates. Any direct costs, such as travel, will be billed at cost. Shiels Obletz Johnsen, Inc. Page 5 of 5 M. 88 Attachment #5 Contract 15 -127 Fehr & Peers (for parking analysis) with amendment #1 F- •, ME CONTRACT FOR SERVICES Amendment #1 Between the City of Tukwila and Fehr and Peers That portion of Contract No. 15 -127 between the City of Tukwila and Fehr & Peers is amended as follows: Section 3: Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than December 31, 2015 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City as authorized by the Mayor. Section 4: The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "13-1" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $25,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. Exhibits A and B are hereby amended and restated as attached hereto as Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B- l. All references to Exhibit A and Exhibit B in contract 15 -127 shall be read as referring to Exhibit A -1 and Exhibit B -1, respectively. All other provisions of the contract shall remain in full force and effect. Dated this day of August, 2015. CITY OF TUKWILA Jim Haggerton, Mayor Fehr & Peers Parking Study Amendment #1 CONSULTANT Chris Breiland, Principal Page 1 of 3 Contract 15 -127 Exhibit A -1 Scope of Work Fehr & Peers will complete the following Scope of Work to peer review for the parking study results being prepared by the Northwest Arena applicants: Kick -off meeting /call with City staff Review of parking study prepared for arena — it is assumed that the applicant will analyze parking demand and develop a plan for up to three events. As part of the review we will focus on the following key assumptions: o Arrival mode split assumptions (we will consider the practical capacity of the transit network in the study area as part of this review) o Average vehicle occupancy o Parking supply locations and amount of proposed parking o Willingness to walk assumptions (how far people will walk from parking to the arena) o Potential parking shuttle arrangements (practicality of shuttles between parking supplies and the arena) o Parking impacts to neighboring businesses; mitigation strategies Memorandum summarizing our review of the parking studies including: o Major issues that may have been missed/understated in the studies and how we recommend to address these issues o Weaknesses with any assumptions o Recommendations of how to strengthen the study o Results and findings of other relevant parking studies for similar facilities /events and localized travel data to document any difference in assumptions /methodology • Meeting or call with City to discuss our review • Response to one round of comments on our peer review from the Project Applicants (assumed as 16 hours of staff time) • As an optional task we can also attend one meeting with the Project Applicants to discuss our findings Fehr & Peers Parking Study Amendment #1 Page 2 of 3 92 Contract 15 -127 Exhibit B -1 Payment Based on the scope of work in Exhibit A -1 invoices will be billed on a time and materials basis based on the following hourly rates: Principal: $240 Project Engineer/Planner: $105 -$135 Administrative: $95 Fehr & Peers Parking Study Amendment #1 Page 3 of 3 93 94 City f Tukwila Contract Number: 15 -127 y Council Approval N/A • 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila WA 98188 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT FOR PARKING ANALYSIS SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "the City ", and Fehr & Peers, hereinafter referred to as "the Consultant ", in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified. 1. Protect Designation. The Consultant is retained by the City to perform parking analysis services in connection with the project titled NW Arena Parking Study Peer Review. 2. Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform the services, identified on Exhibit "A" attached hereto, including the provision of all labor, materials, equipment and supplies. 3. Duration of Agreement; Time for Performance. This Agreement shall be in full force and effect for a period commencing upon execution and ending 12/31/15, unless sooner terminated under the provisions hereinafter specified. Work under this Agreement shall commence upon written notice by the City to the Consultant to proceed. The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant to this Agreement no later than 12/31/15 unless an extension of such time is granted in writing by the City. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work and for services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant shall not exceed $12,500.00 without express written modification of the Agreement signed by the City. B. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City once per month during the progress of the work for partial payment for that portion of the project completed to date. Such vouchers will be checked by the City. and, upon approval thereof, payment shall be made to the Consultant in the amount approved. C. Final payment of any balance due the Consultant of the total contract price earned will be made promptly upon its ascertainment and verification by the City after the completion of the work under this Agreement and its acceptance by the City. D. Payment as provided in this section shall be full compensation for work performed, services rendered, and for all materials, supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work. E. The Consultant's records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept available for inspection by representatives of the City and the state of Washington for a period of three (3) years after final payments. Copies shall be made available upon request. I S+ J X urffvk,,-� .& 5. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, drawings, specifications and other materials produced by the Consultant in connection with the services rendered under this Agreement shall be the property of the City whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. The Consultant shall be permitted to retain copies, including reproducible copies, of drawings and specifications for information, reference and use in connection with the Consultant's endeavors. The Consultant shall not be responsible for any use of the said documents, drawings, specifications or other materials by the City on any project other than the project specified in this Agreement. 6. Compliance with Laws. The Consultant shall, in performing the services contemplated by this Agreement, faithfully observe and comply with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, applicable to the services rendered under this Agreement. 7. Indemnification. The Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Consultant and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Consultant's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 8. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and with the limits described below: CA revised: 1 -2013 •. 1. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability insurance shall cover all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. Page 2 2. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000. general aggregate. Commercial- General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. 4. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability insurance shall be appropriate to the Consultant's profession. B. Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance with respect to the City. Any Insurance, self- insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall, be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not be contributed or combined with it. C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VH. D. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as required by this section shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this Agreement. E. Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice of any policy cancellation, within two business days of their receipt of such notice. F. Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the City may, after giving five business days notice to the Consultant to correct the breach, immediately terminate the contract or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at the sole discretion of the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City. 9. Independent Contractor. The Consultant and the City agree that the Consultant is an independent contractor with respect to the services provided pursuant to this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be considered to create the relationship of employer and employee between the parties hereto. Neither the Consultant nor any employee of the Consultant shall be entitled to any benefits accorded City employees by virtue of the services provided under this Agreement. The City shall not be responsible for withholding or otherwise deducting federal income tax or social security or for contributing to the state industrial insurance program, otherwise assuming the duties of an employer with respect to the Consultant, or any employee of the Consultant. CA revised: 1 -2013 Page 3 97 10. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warrant, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or in its discretion to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. 11. Discrimination Prohibited. The Consultant, with regard to the work performed by it under this Agreement, will not discriminate on the grounds of race, religion, creed, color, national origin, age, veteran status, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, political affiliation or the presence of any disability in the selection and retention of employees or procurement of materials or supplies. 12. Assignment. The Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. 13. Non - Waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision. 14. Termination. A. The City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant. B. In the event of the death of a member, partner or officer of the Consultant, or any of its supervisory personnel assigned to the project, the surviving members of the Consultant hereby agree to complete the work under the terms of this Agreement, if requested to do so by the City. This section shall not be a bar to renegotiations of this Agreement between surviving members of the Consultant and the City, if the City so chooses. 15. Applicable Law: Venue; Attorney's Fees. This Agreement shall be subject to, and the Consultant shall at all times comply with, all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, and rules, including the provisions of the City of Tukwila Municipal Code and ordinances of the City of Tukwila. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be properly laid in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorney's fees and costs of suit. Venue for any action arising from or related to this Agreement shall be exclusively in King County Superior Court. 16. Severability and Survival. If any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is declared void or unenforceable or limited in its application or effect, such event shall not affect any other provisions hereof and all other provisions shall remain fully enforceable. The provisions of this Agreement, which by their sense and context are reasonably intended to survive the completion, expiration or cancellation of this Agreement, shall survive termination of this Agreement. CA revised: 1 -2013 Page 4 17. Notices. Notices to the City of Tukwila shall be sent to the following address: City Clerk City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Notices to Consultant shall b sent to the following address: r IA/i15 rJlP. �uAC( I toot f14 Aim—., Sfe e18. Entire Agreement; ddification. This Agreement, together with attachments or addenda, represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements written or oral. No amendment or modification of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless it is in writing and signed by the parties. DATED this p day of 9�/►„/ , , 20j.;_. CITY OF TUKWILA Jack CA revised : 1 -2013 ity Development Director CONSULTANT gmwmm Printed Name: C- v 'S &�� Title: P�� °tt Page 5 •• FEHRtPEERS June 8, 2015 Jack Pace Exhibit A Director Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Re: Peer Review of Northwest Arena Parking Study P1S- 521 -SE Dear Mr. Pace: Fehr & Peers is pleased to submit this scope of work and budget estimate to peer review the parking study results being prepared by the Northwest Arena applicants. This scope of work would .include the following: • Kick -off meeting /call with City staff • Review of parking study prepared for arena — it is assumed that the applicant will analyze parking demand and develop a plan for up to three events. As part of the review, we will focus on the following key assumptions: o Arrival mode split assumptions (we will consider the practical capacity of the transit network in the study area as part of this review) o Average vehicle occupancy o Parking supply locations and amount of proposed parking o Willingness to walk assumptions (how far people will walk from parking to the arena) o Potential parking shuttle arrangements (practicality of shuttles between parking supplies and the arena o Parking impacts to neighboring businesses, mitigation strategies • Memorandum summarizing our review of the parking studies including: o Major issues that may have been missed /understated in the studies and how we recommend to address these issues o Weaknesses with any assumptions o Recommendations of how to strengthen the study 1001 41h Avenue, Suite 4120, Seattle WA 98154 (206) 576 -4220 Fax (206) 576 -4225 www.fehrandpeers.com 100 June 6, 2014 FEHRtPEERS Page 2 of 2 Exhibit B o Results and findings of other relevant parking studies for similar facilities /events and localized travel data to document any differences in assumptions /methodology • Meeting or call with City to discuss our review • Response to one round of comments on our peer review from the Project Applicants (assumed as 16 hours of staff time) As an optional task, we can also attend one meeting with the Project Applicants to discuss our findings. Based on the scope of work outlined above, we recommend a budget of $12,500 to be billed on a time - and - materials basis. This budget assumption does not include the optional meeting with the project applicants. This fee is based on the following hourly billing rates: Principal: $240 Project Engineer /Planner: $105 -135 Administrative: $95 We look forward to working with you on this project. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, FEHR & PEERS i v Chris Breiland, PE Principal 101 102 COUNCIL AGENDA SYNOPSIS nitials Meelin ,g Dale Prepared by Mayor's review Council review 07/27/15 RF ❑ Resolution Mig Date ❑ Ordinance Mt g Date 08/10/15 co ❑ Other Mt ,g Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ .HR Z DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PWI 08724TIS— co RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development C0Mm1'1-"E`1-` No Committee Review COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/27/15 ITEM INFORMATION ITEM NO. EA 191 -TS111 AFFSPONSOR: NOP-A GIERLOFF 1ORIGINAL, AGF1N1)ADA'1'E: 7/27/15 A(,.],"NDA 1'rj,"m Tri'i.E 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CATEGORY Z Discussion M1 g DP12�115 FlMotion Mt g D t, ❑ Resolution Mig Date ❑ Ordinance Mt g Date ❑ Bid Award Mt g Dale Z Pubhc.Heanq Mt ,g Date 8110119 ❑ Other Mt ,g Date SPONSOR ❑ Council ❑ Mayor ❑ .HR Z DCD ❑ Finance ❑ Fire ❑ IT ❑ P&R ❑ Police ❑ PWI SPONSOR'S The City is completing its phased periodic review and update of its Comprehensive Plan as SUMMARY required by the Washington Growth Management Act. The Planning Commission has reviewed the elements to be considered in 2015, and has sent its recommendations on the Tukwila International Boulevard District, Housing, Residential Neighborhoods, Vision, Introduction, Map Legend, Glossary to the City Council for action. The Council is being asked to review the elements and hold a public hearing on 8/10/15. Rj.?vfl3WFID BY ❑ cow Mtg. ❑ CA&P Cmte ❑ F&S Cmte ❑ Transportation Cmte ❑ Utilities Cmte ❑ Arts Comm. ❑ Parks Comm. ❑ Planning Comm. DATE: COMMITTEE CHAIR: RECOMMENDATIONS: SPONSOR /ADMIN. Department of Community Development C0Mm1'1-"E`1-` No Committee Review COST IMPACT / FUND SOURCE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED AMOUNT BUDGETED APPROPRIATION REQUIRED Fund Source: Comments: MTG. DATE RECORD OF COUNCIL ACTION 7/27/15 Forward to work sessions and public hearing 8/10/15 Forward to next Committee of the Whole Meeting MTG. DATE ATTACHMENTS 7/27/15 Informational Memorandum dated July 15, 2015 with associated materials **Please Bring your Comprehensive Plan binders and materials** OR110-115 **Please Br ng your Comprehensive Plan binders and materials** 08/24/15 Informational Memorandum dated 8118115, with puhlir rnnnent matrix **Please Bring your Comprehensive Plan binders and materials** 103 104 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Haggerton Committee of the Whole FROM: Jack Pace, Director Department of Community Development BY: DCD Staff DATE: August 18, 2015 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Review and Adoption Schedule ISSUE Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) deadlines for all jurisdictions to submit their Comprehensive Plan updates are October 15, 2015 for a draft and December 31, 2015 for an adopted plan. Compliance with the PSRC deadlines is necessary to receive Plan certification, and maintain eligibility for grants during the 2016 cycle. Staff has been in regular contact with PSRC staff, and they are aware of Tukwila's consistent progress. BACKGROUND The City Council is currently completing the final portion of a multi -year review and update of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In order to meet the requirements of the State Growth Management Act, and also to have the updated Comprehensive Plan certified by the Puget Sound Regional Council, the City must complete its review, adopt and submit the final Comprehensive Plan in 2015. 2015 City Council involvement in the Comprehensive Plan update has included the following: January & February – Joint City Council /Planning Commission TIB Visioning Meetings March & April —Joint City Council /Planning Commission Work Sessions on Housing and Residential Neighborhoods Elements July & August —Work sessions /review for Introduction, Vision, Glossary, Land Use Map, Tukwila International Boulevard, Housing, Residential Neighborhoods August 10, 2015 — Public Hearing DISCUSSION Upcoming events and deadlines for Comprehensive Plan review and adoption are listed below: • Work Session: August 24, 2015 • Work Session: September 14, 2015 (if needed to complete review and finalize document text) • Format /Produce Document: Requires approximately 4 weeks (Alternatively, the finalized Comprehensive Plan can be adopted as text with final formatting done after the document has been adopted.) • Adopt document: no later than final 2015 Council meeting (December 14) FINANCIAL IMPACT N/A 105 INFORMATIONAL MEMO Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Council is requested to complete its review, finalize the remaining language and adopt the Comprehensive Plan by the end of 2015. ATTACHMENTS A. Vision, Introduction, Glossary, Land Use Map Legend Comment Matrix & Comment Letters B. Tukwila International Boulevard District Element Comment Matrix & Comment Letters C. Housing Element Comment Matrix & Comment Letters D. Residential Neighborhoods Element Comment Matrix & Comment Letters E. General Comment Matrix & Comment Letters 106 H: \1 InfoMemo 8- 19- 15.doc Vision, Introduction, Glossary and Land Use Legend Issues Matrix ATTACHMENT A Row # Page # Comment (I4nguage changes in strikeout /underline, recommendation � in bold), EXhibit #% Date /Source Staff comment /analysis/options INTRODUCTION 1 P.1 2nd Paragraph, 2nd sentence -- Acknowledge that Tukwila was welcoming individuals from other lands prior to the 1995 Comp Plan adoption. Pam Carter, letter to City Council, 8/10/5 Staff Recommendation: Revise wording as follows--Tukwila continues to be enlivened by an influx... 2 2nd Paragraph - -Add specific statement of consistency with Staff edit for PSRC Staff Recommendation: Add the following wording - -A major multi- county planning policies certification report, emphasis of the GMA is the coordination and consistency of local, regional and state planning efforts. This includes consistency with p.2 8/11/15 adopted multi- county planning policies, including VISION 2040, and county -wide planning policies. 3 4th Paragraph - -add "multi- county" Staff edit for PSRC Staff Recommendation: Add the following wording: Tukwila's certification, Comprehensive Plan, however, is more than a response expressed in p.2 8/11/15 the Growth Management Act, multi- county policies, and the King County policies implementing it regionally. 4 Top of page -- Capitalize "District" Pam Carter, letter to Staff Recommendation: Revise wording as follows -- Tukwila p.4 City Council, International Boulevard District... 8/10/15 5 2nd paragraph - -- Certain elements are no longer needed per Staff edit , 8/17/15 Staff Recommendation: Add the following: During the 2015 updates that have been made in the Plan. Add wording to Comprehensive Plan update, the introductory "Obstacles to Plan Achievement" section, as well as optional Annexation and reflect deleting the discussion of "Obstacles to the Plan" section and the Annexation and Maintenance of the Plan Maintenance of the Plan elements were deleted as they have elements. accomplished or are covered in other parts of the Plan.The issues discussed in the "Obstacles to Plan Achievement" have been addressed in a positive and action - oriented manner through policies and strategies in the "Community Image and Identity" and "Roles and p.5 Responsibilities" elements. Proposed annexations have been lamely accomplished, and remaining annexation - related issues are addressed through policies in the Community Image and Identity, and Tukwila South elements. Policies that pertain to revising and updating the Comprehensive Plan have been codified in Tukwila Municipal Code chapter 18.80 6 2nd to last paragrah, 1st sentence - -Which "five areas ?" Pam Carter, letter to Staff Recommendation: Clarify this and add wording for PSRC. City Council, 8/10/15 Delete sentence #1- - "The majority of the City's jobs and housing are or will be located with the five following areas which are the focus of the City's planing efforts." p.5 Revise sentence #2 to read as follows: "Tukwila will plan capital improvements and services to achieve its vision and goals, with sufficient capacity for growth targets in housing and employment through the planning period to 2035." 7 Last sentence -- Correct date is "2011," rather than "2012." Staff edit, 8/17/15 Staff Recommendation: Revise to say: The Plan has been kept current p.6 with specific annual updates as well as more comprehensive review in 2004 and in a phased review from 2011 through 2015. M M 8 First sentence -- Change wording for clarity Pam Carter, letter Staff Recommendation: Revise to read "We seek to enable our P.1 to City Council, residents to appreciate, participate in and enjoy the many benefits of 8/10/5 a healthy, thriving natural environment. 9 Page 3, 2nd paragraph, 4th Sentence -- Encourage Pam Carter, letter to Staff Recommendation: Simplify and revise to read "We encourage p.3 participation of "newer" as well as "long- term" residents, and acknowledge their contributions to the community. City Council, 8/10/5 the social and civic engagement of all community residents, who are a tremendous resource and have much to contribute." 10 Concurrency -- change "meet" to "meeting" Pam Carter, letter to Staff Recommendation: Revise to read: " Concurrency: Concurrency City Council, means that streets, sewer, water and surface water facilities or the p.2 8/10/15 funds required for the improvements_ meet the City's adopted standards that are in place at the time they are needed. 11 Add a definition of "Historic Preservation" Joan Hernandez, email to DCD staff. email t5 Staff Recommendation: Include a definition of Historic Preservation with elements from comment and King County: "Historic Preservation means safeguarding the existence and appearance of historically significant elements of the community and the area, such as buildings, sites, objects, districts and landscapes, archaeological resources and traditional cultural places to help maintain historic, architectural, and aesthetic character and heritage, and provide a sense of place and continuity." W: \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \Intro, Vision, Glossary, Legend -- Matrix-- .xls107 12 Delete this discussion from Comp Plan. Staff edit, 8/17/15 Staff Recommendation -- Delete. These issues are fully addressed in a positive, actionable manner in the "Community Image and Identity" and "Roles and Responsibilities" elements. See wording in "Introduction" , Row 5 above. 001140 1 13 Mixed Use - Office -- Clarify punctuation, format for second Pam Carter, letter to Staff Recommendation -- Revise to read: Mixed -Use Office: "...These P.1 sentence City Council, uses and densities are modified where covered by the Tukwila South 8/10/15 Overlay." 14 The Urban Renewal Overlay District is not listed in the Staff edit, 8/17/15 Staff Recommendation -- Include a new section: Urban Renewal: An Special Overlays section overlay area which applies the Tukwila International Boulevard Revitalization and Urban Renewal Plans. The intent is to promote community redevelopment and revitalization, and to encourage p.3 investment that supports well - designed, compact, transit - oriented and pedestrian - friendly residential and business developments to activate the community along Tukwila International Boulevard. 108 . \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \Intro, Vision, Glossary, Legend -- Matrix - -.xlsx August 11, 2015 Rebecca Fox, Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 Subject: PSRC Comments on Draft Tukwila Comprehensive Plan Elements Dear Rebecca, Thank you for providing an opportunity for the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) to review a draft of the housing and Tukwila International Boulevard District elements for the City of Tukwila 2015 Comprehensive Plan update. We recognize the substantial amount of time and effort invested in this plan, and appreciate the chance to review it while in draft form. This timely collaboration helps to ensure certification requirements are adequately addressed and certification action can be taken by PSRC boards after adoption. PSRC reviewed and commented on the draft transportation, capital facilities, utilities, natural environment, shoreline and urban center elements in 2013. This review addresses only policies and provisions in the housing and Tukwila International Boulevard District elements. In addition to the many outstanding aspects of the draft plan that we noted in our previous letter, other noteworthy aspects include: • A thorough housing needs assessment, which provides a multilayer analysis of the current and future housing needs for the city. Additionally, the key findings from the needs assessment have been thoughtfully analyzed and translated into priority issues for the city. • Inclusion of actionable implementation strategies for each housing goal. • Policies in the International Boulevard element that emphasize innovative economic development strategies and commitment to equitable development in the transit station area. The draft comprehensive plan advances regional policy in many important ways. There are some items, however, that should be considered before the plan elements are finalized: • As a signatory to the Growing Transit Communities (GTC) Regional Compact, the City of Tukwila has an opportunity to demonstrate a commitment in its comprehensive plan to promoting thriving and equitable transit- oriented development. The city addresses this commitment in the Tukwila International Boulevard District element and includes policies that support the intent of the Compact. The plan could be further strengthened by including policies or discussion that specifically addresses transit- oriented development in the housing element. • The plan horizon year appears to be misstated in Housing Policy 3.1.1. Prior to adoption, the city should review plan elements to ensure a consistent horizon year throughout. • The city should consider developing a timeline for or prioritization of strategies in the housing element to support timely and effective implementation. PSRC has resources available to assist the city in addressing these comments. We have provided links to online documents in this letter, and additional resources related to the plan review process can also be found at http— / /www.psrc.orL; /growth /plaiireview /resources /. I Thank you again for working with us through the plan review process. There is a lot of excellent work in the draft and we are available to continue to provide assistance and additional reviews as the plan moves through the development process. If you have questions or need additional information, please contact me at 206 - 464 -6174 or LIJnderwood Bultni nn(a),psrc.org. Sincerely, Liz Underwood- Bultmann Associate Planner Growth Management Planning cc: Review Team, Growth Management Services, Department of Commerce 110 August 10, 2015 Dear Tukwila City Council, I would like to express my support for the Draft Comp Plan Elements that are the subject of tonight's public hearing. I am not speaking on behalf of TIBAC; these are my personal remarks. Below are my general comments on each element, followed by specific recommendation for changes. Thank you for the opportunity to offer my comments. Sincerely, 4115 S. 139" St. Tukwila, WA 98168 Tukwila International Blvd. Element I am pleased that the draft you are considering very closely matches the vision developed by TIBAC. We spent two years discussing, reconsidering, and ultimately adopting The Boulevard: Our Vision for the Future which we presented to the Tukwila City Council a little over three years ago in April 2012. 1 ask that you reread the faux article Small City Realizes Big Dream (see page 4 of this letter) that came out of our 2008 training with the Pacific Institute. Then ask yourselves if this Comp Plan will help make this vision a reality. I've also included a map to show you how close together the Village and TOD Nodes are. It is imperative that the City acts quickly to adopt zoning or a master plan for both areas. It would be a shame if a desirable development went to another city (Renton, Kent, etc.) because we were dragging our feet. As you review your draft, remember that unless specified, the goals and policies pertain to the entire TIB District which includes quite a lot of residential neighborhoods. Page 4 — Figure 1 I have some concerns about the boundaries of the Tukwila Intl. Blvd. District. The northern portions of the District (north of S. 139' and S. 140" Sts.) do not really have a relationship to TIB as they are separated from TIB due to their topography. The western portion is on a hillside and only one street, S. 132 "d St., provides access to TIB. To the east, only S. 130th St. provides access to the residential area that is below TIB. By comparison, the neighborhoods east of 42nd Ave. S. are more directly affected by conditions along TIB, yet are not part of the District. Perhaps I don't understand the reason for including these areas in the District. Page 12 — Goal 8.2 1 support using nodes of more intensive development. As TIBAC began work on its TIB vision, we came to the realization that different areas, which we called segments, had distinct characteristics. 111 PJ Page 13 – Figure 2 This figure clearly shows the relationship and general location of the two nodes. However, it is also important to see how close together the two nodes are. Please see my Figure 1 at the end of this letter. Note that the SRO property south of SR 518 is within a %2 mile of the light rail station. Page 15 — Implementation Strategies, Village Node, 2 "d bullet I agree the URO boundaries should be adjusted to facilitate development. I encourage you to take the %2 mile radius into account when revising the boundaries. Page 16 — bullet above the sidebar box I'm not sure what a conference /training center would bring to the Village Node. My experience is that attendee's meals are catered, and they leave the center immediately after the meeting. What we need is more activity on the street and patrons for our local businesses. Page 16 — TOD Node, 1St bullet It is vitally important that you develop a vision and master plan for this area so the City is ready if a developer comes along. Someone could be looking to do a development outside of but near to Seattle. If we don't have zoning, etc. in place, that person would just go to another city such as Renton or Burien where it's easy to determine what type of development would be allowed. Page 18 — Land Use Outside the Nodes Note that unless otherwise specified, these policies are for the entire TIB District outside of the nodes. 8.2.10 — I don't believe that opportunities for retail should be expanded into the residential neighborhoods of the District. 8.2.11 — Light industrial may be appropriate on commercial properties along or near TIB, it is not appropriate in residential neighborhoods. 8.2.12 — I support this policy and would remind you that most areas outside the nodes where multifamily housing will be built are not on TIB. In other words, they may be on side streets off of TIB.8.2.14 — TIB between S. 128th and S. 137th Sts, with the exception of the Sierra Sue Apartments,. is not predominantly residential in use or character. So this statement should be rewritten to apply to the residential neighborhoods away from TIB. Pages 18 & 19 — Policy 8.2.15 1 support this strategy to explore other zoning for these parcels such as the former Bernie & Boys site. At TIBAC we had a lot of discussion about these parcels. We noted that: "For most of this segment, the topography limits the amount of developable property that accesses the Boulevard, and most of the single - family homes are grade- separated from the Boulevard. For those reasons, we support a compatible mix of businesses and residential development." I would also encourage you look at the sentence about affordable housing then read the strategy on the top of page 21. If housing were to be developed on any of these parcels, I wouldn't have a problem with ground floor living units. In fact, requiring retail or office on the ground floor would almost ensure that housing would not be built on any of these parcels. 112 Page 19 — Policy 8.2.18 Gateways should also include the name of the district as mentioned in the first Implementation Strategy as shown on page 35. They could also include banners. So revise this to read. "Use architectural and landscape elements along with signage and banners to mark transitions..." Page 21 — bullet This strategy should be removed. Remember, it applies to the entire TIB District including the area outside the nodes. We have many stand -alone apartment buildings, such as both Samara buildings, with ground floor living units. Page 23 — Policy 8.4.2 The last line has a typo: "tothe" needs a space inserted. As an example of a continuous building wall with off - street parking, see my Figure 2. It shows an L- shaped building with parking behind and alongside building. (Google Street View gives a much better view than my photo.) Page 31 — first bullet See my Figures 3 and 4 for examples of woonerfs in residential areas. 113 0 REALIZATION oFlj YEAR VISION CREATES NEW LIFE FOR TozwiLACITIZENS By I.M. 8uRpmsm SEATTLE (AP) Tukwila, a diverse, historic city in Washington State celebrated the grand opening of Tukwila Village —uo innovative, visionary ououzuuuJy gathering place. Ikckcy strategies for including all members of the community in the development process have become a national model. Tukwila's many positive attributes attract people from all walks of life, and from all over the world. The city is centrally located with great access to all types of transportation, plane, train, automobile and pedestrian. It is the knnoe to the largest shopping center oo the West Coast with cutting edge retail shops. A jewel io the scenic Northwest, there are splendid views of Mount Rainier from many areas io the city. Tukwila also has uu exten- sive purksyatuuvvidb6uoJzedsufnuUoauf6ikc/wulkio&kuils.aoioterouduoalauoocroumplor'uquuiiocootcr and world class convention center. Several high-tech industries specializing in everything from bio-tech and health care to aerospace and global communications have chosen to locate in the city. These companies rely on ]ukxpdu's diverse population to staff their businesses. There are more than d4 languages spoken io the city's schools. The sign entering the city expresses this diversity "We Welcome the World". On Wednesday, September 15, Governor Gregoire will recognize the resourcefulness of the Tukwila Mayor and City Council with theJFK Excellence in Government Award for its innovative community driven transforma- tion ^fofoouorhigxvoyc^oidorint^okigbguo\dyud/ouh^u\cvard.Iuoddidoudbef\uuerioouIoetitute^fAr- chitects awarded the prestigious Thomas Jefferson Award for Public Architecture to the city for the quality ofits aggressive mix of residential/neighborhood design and shopping environment. A soft wheel trolley now serves U6cuc*rcuidcu(auoJcmpluyccaiuU6carcucuouediugUhoututhelumullig8raU.6uoiucaaey.ucig66oc6ou6 parks and services. Moderate income high-amenity housing has increased by 30% in the last four years and local jobs on the boulevard have increased by 50%. Despite initial resistance among core constituencies in the city, new municipal offices built in the area kicked off and supported the transformation. "We love the new location of City Hall across from Tukwila Village', said Mrs. Barbara Bean owner/operator of the new Boulevard Coffee Shop. "The Boulevard Coffee Shop is percolating. People can't stop talking about the Boulevard and are waiting for vacancies io the many properties. The real estate market here iabummiog." The other citizens iuthe area echo Mrs. Bean's sentiments: ^l'cu really excited about the new Swedish bokery.^ "The entertainment options are great, international films and live dboNzo.^ ^^I6e Boulevard has created u positive attitude iu the minds of tourists." ^l love TukwUn!' In a surprise move announced earlier today D6jA VU Showgirls acquired ownership in Cowgirls Espresso. As part of the merger the new. corporation, D6j A vu Cowgirls, will be closing their operations in Tukwila and relo- cating 1000evyr^pertyu^vvuudcxo^oetroodouiuDd\evme. Three years ago the comer of 144"' and Tukwila International Boulevard was a vacant lot. Now it's a center for the community uf Tukwila, providing government. and commercial services iu close walking distance tuIuk- v,Un'mrosidotinl ooigkhn6znnda. Investors from India, China and Canada tn name nfew are realizing what local investors have known for years. The once tarnished reputation of what was known ua Highway y9 has been re- placed *iUbpodcstriuo-frieodly storefronts, new multi-family and single-family housing. What this journalist has discovered is that it's not the beautiful landscaping, charming shops or diverse ethnic restaurants that have changed this boulevard, the driving force of this change has been the residents themselves. TIBACCre@ted this vision @S part Of our Pacific Institute trainings, in July 2008. al Figure 1 Green circle '/4 mile radius Blue circle '/2 mile radius The general rule of thumb is that most people are willing to walk 1/4 to catch transit. Usually' /2 mile is the furthest people will walk to transit. Note that S. 146th St. (the south side of Saar's market) is approximately' /2 mile from the light rail station. 115 Figure 2 Central Avenue Plaza in Kent on Central Ave S. just south of its intersection with W. Smith St. Figure 3 Woonerfs where users share the street without boundaries such as lanes and curbs 116 Figure 4 11 Housing Element I strongly support this element's emphasis on a diversity of housing choices. Not everyone wants a 3 bedroom, 2 bath with a large yard. Young techies go for small apartments or condos. Some empty nesters want to stay in their current homes, some want smaller houses with smaller yards, others want to rent an apartment while they use their equity to fund world travel. Different choices for different folks. I was very surprised to see the strong support for housing diversity shown at The Community Conversations held last year. Good design guidelines and good design review makes all the difference. I understand you face conflicting demands — better /more low- income housing, more middle- & higher - income housing to provide a balance, no more big houses, no two -story houses, no more density, a requirement to accommodate more housing units, etc. There is no way to do all of this and keep everyone happy. Please keep in mind that ADUs are a great solution for accommodating an older relative or even a young family member because it allows them to live independently while being close enough for you to keep an eye on them. Don't be afraid of change because if you require new housing to match what already exists, we won't get any new development. No one is building 1960s ramblers today. Page 3 — Home Ownership Options Delete "hoping to 'age in place. "' because the current range of housing options doesn't accommodate seniors who are looking for other types of living units, not just seniors who want to remain in their own homes. In fact, since much of the City's single - family homes are one - story, many seniors are able to remain in their homes as they age, if that is their choice. What we lack is other types of housing that seniors can move to if they choose to give up their large homes with large yards. Page 4 — Policy 3.2.1 1 would not support changing the wording of this policy as "diverse" is the right word. Diversity can refer to many attributes, not just racial diversity. I have heard people say they chose to live in Tukwila not just because of its multi - cultural flavor, but because of the variety of homes in our neighborhoods. They do not value uniformity. The policy as written supports a diversity of housing in our neighborhoods. Page 5 — Implementation Strategies First bullet — remove "attached" from the description of ADUs. Judging from the public response at last year's two Community Conversations, residents support allowing detached ADUs if they are done carefully. See Figures 5 & 6 where the 3rd photo (counting down) shows a detached ADU in the side yard and the 8th photo shows a single -story cottage in the rear yard. The example they didn't like was the 5th photo, a bright blue, three -story tower in the side yard. I believe that good design, adequate parking, etc. is more important than whether or not the ADU is attached to the main house. Second bullet — remove both instances of "limited" in this strategy. The previous demonstration project limitations were overly cautious and restrictive. If we continue in this vein, we will have the same results, no cottage housing, etc. I believe the City should develop codes for these housing types rather than limit them to demonstration projects. Other cities have allowed them for many years. Tukwila should note their lessons learned and adopt realistic, workable regulations. 117 Sixth bullet — I believe the wording recommended by the Planning Commission should be retained. This would give the City control over the locations of affordable housing so it is not clustered into a ghetto. By specifying the type and characteristics of the housing, as well as the location, Tukwila would be assured that affordable housing is attractive and integrated into our community. Page 9 Policy 3.6.2 — Revise the sentence so it reads: "Encourage long -term residency by providing a range of home ownership options suitable for people in all stages of their lives." This would mean small rental units for busy, young singles, larger houses for families, and smaller homes for looking to simplify and downsize. Implementation Strategies — add a new strategy: "Develop relationships with existing homeowner and neighborhood associations." The fifth bullet talks about helping to develop associations, but there are at least several current homeowners associations in Tukwila. The City would not want to provide on -going support to these groups but should definitely develop relationships with them. 118 E3 Figure 5 Figure 6 119 10 Residential Neighborhoods Compliments to whomever developed the map of neighborhoods on page 4. Well done! I would like to add a word of caution about neighborhood councils as they exist in some cities. They often become mini - planning commissions with the power to nix projects because they are focused only on their neighborhood and their narrow interests. Contrast that to our Planning Commission and City Council who take a more holistic view on what is best for the city overall. In some cities, a neighborhood council would have prevented Tukwila Village from being built. It is great to get neighborhood input, that should be done, but the Council and the Planning Commission should be the ones making the decisions. Page 6 — Noise Abatement I challenge you to cover the Noise Abatement title with your finger, and then carefully read this paragraph. Did you get the sense that this is about protecting neighborhoods from noise? Does it even mention noise? Maybe all it needs is to replace "encroachment" with "noise ". It definitely needs something to make clear that the topic is focused on protecting neighborhoods from noise including auto traffic, airports, and light and heavy rail. Page 8 Policy 7.2.4 — The suggested change to "Use new development to foster..." doesn't seem quite right to me. I'd suggest revising it to read: "New development should foster a sense..." Fifth bullet — This could be a little clearer. Would sidewalks be required only in the specified areas? Or does it mean that the LID option would only be available in specified areas? If it is the latter, then I would revise to read: "Require sidewalks adjacent to all new development. Develop criteria to offer an alternative option for participation in a no- protest LID." Page 9 — Second bullet "maintain" should be "maintains" Page 10 — Implementation Strategies, Eighth bullet These strategies are to support the goal of neighborhood sustainability by continuing enhancement and revitalization of residential neighborhoods to encourage long -term residency and environmental sustainability. Therefor an implantation strategy that focuses on new single - family homes is incomplete. It should be revised to include other types of housing as in: "Development of a variety of new housing including single - family homes as well as townhomes, etc." Page 11 — First and second bullets I do not support requiring landscape planters on residential streets. Personally, I like them but have several reasons for my opposition. Homeowners often neglect them, leaving a weedy or bare patch between the street and the sidewalk. They don't fit the current pattern in much of our residential neighborhoods. This is a major change in policy; it is not something the City has usually required. If you must keep the landscape planters, I'd suggest revising it to say: "Require sidewalks and, where appropriate, landscape planters for both sides of residential streets and where appropriate on 2 -lane street improvements." 120 11 Page 12 — Implementation Strategies, Third bullet This bullet conflicts with Housing Element Policy 3.1.2 which calls for exploring adopting smaller lots sizes in residential neighborhoods. I support changing "Revise" to "Explore" in order to align it with the cited housing policy. I would revise it to read: "Explore maintaining standard minimum lot size of 6,500 SF but allowing smaller lot sizes subject to ..." Page 15 — Policy 7.5.1 Make this clearer by revising to say: "...one- quarter mile of residential areas to those neighborhoods with ..." Page 16 — Goal 7.6 This goal and accompanying policies were written when Southcenter Blvd. was the name of the street east of 1 -5. The street to the west of 1 -5 was called South 154th Street. These policies are appropriate for the area east of 1 -5, but do not pertain to the western portion of the street. For instance, in the west Southcenter Blvd. does not "act as a buffer to the low- density residential neighborhoods to the north." Just to be clear, Southcenter Blvd. is the road between City Hall and 1 -405 that continues west and goes under 1 -5 all the way to the city limits at International Blvd. Therefore, the goal and policies should be rewritten so that it is clear they are for only the eastern portion of the road. The second implementation strategy should be deleted as the street lies outside of the area covered by the Southcenter Plan. Glossary Page 2 — Concurrency "meet" should be changed to "meeting" so the sense of the sentence is that facilities meeting standards are in place at the time needed. It would read: "...facilities, or the funds required for the improvements, meeting the City's adopted ..." Land Use Map Legend Page 1 — Mixed -Use Office It's a little hard to read the revised punctuation, but the first sentence should end with a period after "residential uses." Then to match the pattern used in the LDR and MDR definitions on the same page, the next sentence should begin: "These uses and densities ..." Vision Page 2 — Pride of Place, We Value Our Environment, 1St sentence The sentence needs revised by inserting "in" after "participate" and replacing "from" with "of" so it reads: "... residents to appreciate, participate in, and enjoy the many benefits of a healthy,..." Page 3 — We Seek To Provide Opportunities For Residents, 4th sentence I believe we should also encourage the engagement of people who are not long -term residents. The sentence should be revised to read: "We encourage the social and civic engagement of both our long -time and newer residents who together are a tremendous resource and have much to contribute to our community." 121 12 Introduction Page 1 — Introduction, 2 "d paragraph, 2nd sentence This sentence needs revised as Tukwila was already welcoming refugees to our community prior to 1995. In the 1980s Southeast Asians arrived in Tukwila. Following them, our community saw Poles, Russians, Mexicans, Central Americans, and Somalis arrive to begin their new lives in the United States. So the 2 "d sentence should read, "Tukwila continues to be enlivened by an influx..." Page 4 — top of page, #2 "District" should be capitalized so it reads: "...reinvigorate the Tukwila International Boulevard District both ..." Page 5 — 2nd to last paragraph, V sentence This refers to five areas but does not identify them. 122 TO: TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL August 16, 2015 RE: PUBLIC HEARING COMMENTS I apologize that I needed to leave the August 10 Public Hearing before my name was called to testify. I also attended the Planning Commission Public Hearing on June 25, 2015. 1 was able to testify at that time and my comments appear in the June 25, 2015 Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission members seemed receptive to the request I made in my public comments and the Planning Commission Minutes reflect that "Commissioner Hansen requested a place holder in the matrix to incorporate language" that I had requested. Unfortunately, I did not see my comments listed in the Matrix that the Council received. Therefore, I planned to attend the Council Public Hearing to repeat my request. I appreciate Council President Kruller announcing that with the Council's concurrence, written public testimony will be allowed through August 17t ". My comments appear below: I am very supportive of the Community Image and Identity language in Chapter One of the Comprehensive Plan. I especially like Goal 1.3 "A heritage conserved and interpreted so that Tukwila's citizens recognize connections with the past and celebrate the diverse cultures represented in the community." And, I very much appreciate the following policies being incorporated into the Comp Plan: Policy 1.3.1 Identify and protect historically significant properties, structures and sites, in either their present or a nearby location, as determined in a City -wide survey and designation process. Policy 1.3.2 Provide prominent public art and interpretive markers at highly visible locations, explaining the history of the Interurban Trolley, the Green /Duwamish River, Duwamish Hill Preserve, and other important buildings, sites, events or persons. Policy 1.3.3 Establish a process for providing Incentives and designation certain structures as landmarks. And I very much appreciate the following Implementation Strategies in the Comp Plan: • Contract with King County Landmarks Board for historic preservation services • Develop and implement a historic resources designation procedure and program to ensure that these sites continue t be part of the community. • Seek certified Local Government status to secure funding and technical assistance for historic preservation. • Develop incentives, such as fee waivers or code flexibility, to encourage preservation of historic preservation. 123 Although I do appreciate the language included in the above policies and implementation strategies in the Community Image and Identity Section of the Comp Plan, I would appreciate it if there could be some language in the Housing and Residential Neighborhood Elements section that cross - references readers to the language that refers to historic preservation in the Community Image and identity Section. Readers reading the Housing and Residential Neighborhood Elements may not realize that historic preservation is addressed separately in the Community Image and Identity Section. Also, I would like to see Historic Preservation added to the Glossary and defined as: "Historic Preservation means safeguarding the existence and appearance of historic elements of the community, it preserves the historic, architectural, and aesthetic character and heritage of a community or area, and helps to provide a sense of place and continuity." Thank you for allowing me to submit my written comments to be included in the 2015 Public Comments for the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update. Joan Hernandez 15224 Sunwood Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 124 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Obstacles to Plan Achievement OBSTACLES TO PLAN ACH i EVEMENT These are obstacles that can prevent the community from achieving the vision expressed in this Plan: Inadequate Communication and Citizen Involvement Citizens are often not sufficiently informed about our community, may not identify with the community, and may not participate in community pppllllllllll° �� decisions and in caring for each other.pplllllllll�� 1 Diffused Responsibilities �� Responsibility for decision making, capital improvement progr �lllllllllllt�� provision of services is diffused among many public a e s, privat vendors, volunteer agencies, and individual citize Ihhi , fte I�i� oducing lFb creativity, effectiveness, and efficiency, this di al ma ��IIII accountability and coordination more difficult. Overwhelming and Unresp Citizens often find it difficult to erstand A ltitude of technical public issues and procedures. Gover ent encies have often not sufficiently clarified issues, responded to c con ins in layman's language, and encouraged them to be 1 d ep on making. Narrow Short-Ter That Harm the Community Governmen K ofteff active rather than proactive. Citizens and businesses often giv It little at ntion to preserving our environment. Some busin s fo �u o heir own success while using methods which may har ublic are. Of particular concern are unsavory businesses, which ma arm young people and generate crime. Special- interest politics distort the p 'ftical process. Insufficient Money to Provide Desired Services As populations and expectations increase beyond available revenues, many desirable projects and programs are delayed. Neighborhoods lack needed amenities. Economic development is inadequately organized and focused. December 5, 2005 11 125 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Obstacles to Plan Achievement 12 126 Increasing Transient Nature of Some Residential Neighborhoods Some of our residential neighborhoods have a high turnover rate. This contributes to problems in our schools, lack of community identity and involvement, high crime rate, and deteriorating housing. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ��owovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv � �� 1111111111111111111 °,,. ��\� ��° � �111�j�111111111111111111 �,,��,�\ °" 111111111111111 11111111111111�w111p ° ° ° °v 1111111111 �i�\vvvvvvvvvvvvll�� gl�lli\�vvyv��i�uiv�vvv1f1 December 5, 2005 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Maintenance of the Plan MAINTENANCE OF THE PLAN PURPOSE Embodied in the Growth Management Act's new framework for land use �� ,, planning and regulation are the concepts of consistency and concurrency. �� The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires local land use plans to be consistent with each other, and with those of adjacent jurisdictions. Development regulations must also be consistent with land use lar 11 Under the GMA's requirements for concurrency, supporting face es an services must be available when development occurs, and lo c ris Fictions must ensure the "timely financing of needed infrastructure" ( 5 -195- 010)• �� To achieve these mandates, Tukwila's land use and ub1' aciliti plans must be developed in an integrated planning eff� stem Plan, Sewer System Plan, Surface Water Maria e Ian nsportation Improvement Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, Ii as Program and Parks and Open Space Plan will need to clos m �J ed to the Comprehensive Plan and its implement) !�,egula ns. However, these plans cannot an ' ate all o changes in development, local needs and community v„ les t t will occur over the 20- to 30 -year planning period. Growth in t on adjacent jurisdictions will also have unanticipated, cu e e tt�� n response, local land use and public facilities plans e ql Tukwila's public facilities utiti re periodically updated as required by state statute. To sisten and concurrency, this section of the Comprehen e Plan ovides for the review, monitoring and updating of Tukwil Ia use p. ISSUE The policies and implementation strategies in this section respond to the requirements of the GMA. The GMA requires that the Comprehensive Plan provide for an "ongoing process of evaluation to ensure internal and interjurisdictional consistency of comprehensive plans and continuous consistency of development regulations with such plans" (WAC 365 -195- 630 (1)). The GMA recognizes that, periodically, development regulations need to be updated. As regulations must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, December 2008 179 127 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Maintenance of the Plan 180 128 some changes in the Plan may be needed. The GMA also states that amendments to the Plan shall not be considered more frequently than once every year, except in cases of emergency or to adopt or amend the shoreline master program, to adopt a subarea plan, to amend the capital facilities element if concurrent with the adoption of the City budget, to resolve an appeal filed with a Growth Management Hearings Board or court, or in other instances as specified in the state legislation (RCW 36.70A.130). Otherwise, the specific content and form of the annual review, including provisions for public involvement, should be established in the development r11 lations. GOALS AND POLICIES vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv��,'�� vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv��, Goal 16.1 �w�uwvvvvvvvvvvv�� \ \��owovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv A Comprehensive Plan and develo ent r lations that are reviewed and updated as app rop te, ' ord 'to respond to changes in community needs, a ns pe progress toward accomplishing the goals and polic o �e Comprehensive Plan. �\ �� ° �� 11111�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��u ° ° ", Policies fib. 16.1.1 rea Seni V f"bedure for annually processing Co h s Plan amendments that shall provide for the follows \,, An application process where any proponent may foully request a Comprehensive Plan or development U\\\\\\\\\l�d \ °u\a�ll elation change from the City. ,till, IN11�vvwvv �— A docketing system to track and list requested changes. 11111111111111�w111p ° ° ° °v Public notice of requested changes, with opportunity for the submission of written comments. Preparation of a staff report and recommendation on each requested change that contains the following sections. • Request • Background • Impact to Comprehensive Plan, development regulations, and surrounding properties • Alternatives • Appropriate code citations • Other relevant documents December 2008 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Maintenance of the Plan Council receives the staff report prior to the meeting in which the request is to be considered. Council considers the request. Proponent is allowed to make a presentation. Appropriate City staff are present as subject matter experts. — Council review results in one of three decisions. • Refer request to the Planning Commission for further review and recommendation to the City Council, where the request and Planning Commission recommendation are reviewed prior to a public hearing to be held by the City Council. The Council then deliberates and rejects, modifies, or approves the request depending on whether:�� 1) the issue is adequately addressed in the 2) a public need exists; 3) the request is the best means form in e public need; and ppppo. 4) the proposed change will be ,,1 et b e the community. • Defer further City Council � isi r tiN r one or more years to allow the rth time to evaluate the impact o �� the existing Comprehensive Pla„,��r re ti. • Reject the request. IMPLEMENTA + Periodic and poli, + Periodic f6 Il�g#094 tions December 2008 mprehensive Plan designations RCW 36.70A. n of implementing development to City's long -range plans. 181 129 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Maintenance of the Plan ��owovvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv � �� 1111111111111111111 °,,. ��\� �" � �111�j�111111111111111111 14 q�V�V� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ �,,��,�\ °" 111111111111111 11111111111111�w111p ° ° ° °v 1111111111 182 December 2008 130 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNEXATION The purpose of the Annexation Element is to ensure a smooth transition from county to city jurisdiction when unincorporated land is annexed to the City. The goal and policies in this element establish a framework for addressing public services, infrastructure, and utility extension and interjurisdictional issues. Annexation of unincorporated land adjacent to the City benefits the residents, and property owners. Property owners and residents if. to urban services provided by Tukwila, such as enhanced polic d protection and building and land use controls. For the City, 1,ne yields benefits that include the ability to control new developli; ensuring ease of future maintenance; control of impac4,ot thel s the ability to extend its boundaries in a logical, servV/ r fire and ISSUES 2/l/l/1007" mile was incorporated The Town of Tukwila occupying less th'�i,,:�,,,a / squ in 1908. Until 1987, the commu gremrl/�;) ut steadily through a series of annexations that, save he Sout�h 'er shopping and industrial area, were small, already urb zed"#eas. Then, between 1987 and 1993, major annexations of largerlur' ed ag I s nearly doubled the City's size and more than tripled ill A lat e City now encompasses over 5,510 acres. Annexa n a (C (C u r ON, with t , Growth Management Act and King County planning polici u potential annexation areas. The following crit a r ap le in an examination of adjacent unincorporated areas to ide tify p , , tial annexation areas: 0 Logical and historical community identification and affiliation with Tukwila 0 Financial and technical ability of the City to provide municipal services 0 Logical service areas through vehicular accessibility, public safety response, and utility construction December 2008 Annexation 65 131 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Annexation .. 132 ■ Physical boundaries such as waterways, topography, watersheds, and freeways ■ Protection of critical and resource areas significant to a particular jurisdiction, including opportunities for open space corridors between urban areas ■ Logical boundaries, eliminating unincorporated islands ■ Presence of special - purpose districts and the con j ' e annexation area's urban services infrastructure This process identified the potential annexation are th th�� p p� f shown on the following map. (Figure 9) Boundary Adjustments Tukwila's growth throe etitioned f///n -moons has created certain boundary anomalies: p i 0 ■ City of Seattle: a ceder co fl §uration between Tukwila and Seattle in the K' 'Co / n0 rt area in which the boundary crosses Inters t '� 5 % %ore th once and splits certain industrial properties at n %er of jurisdictional issues, including police ron� ■ City of W� to A portion of the northeast boundary between /kwila an�;nton crosses and recrosses the Burlington kern Railway right-of-way. 'ty I `SeaTac: On the southwest, the boundary between T', ila and SeaTac crosses Interstate 5 and other streets in several places, creating difficulties for the reasonable provision of services. Tukwila, Seattle, Kent, Renton, SeaTac and their citizens will need to jM negotiate the issues and challenges of these border anomalies. (Figure 9) oio ooh /// December 2008 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Annexation a Figure 9 - Annexation and Boundary Adjustment Areas December 2008 67 133 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Annexation .: 134 GOAL AND POLICIES Goal 6.1 A logical and serviceable municipal boundary. Annexation Area Policies 6.1.1 Freely make available to persons and areas din the ity s �, G annexation and minor boundary adjust t information related to Tukwila's taxes, se� each annexation process emphasizing p % ,��rma n and clear communication among the kwil, /� nity, City government, and the area and ; c eral /i/ 6.1.2 Work with King County�t r local jurisdictions to coordinate services to i ar S. jj!/ 6.1.3 Consider the anne�on bourn ry as the extent of Tukwila's anne, °'tior °area. 6.1.4 In ac King and Xth ountywide Planning Policies for ter lic ed citizens and property owners ig cities of SeaTac, Kent, Renton, and interlocal agreements providing for processes to adjust border anomalies. Policy nnexations do not detract from adopted level of randards. ming Policy `iat zoning proposed for an annexation area is it with Tukwila's adopted Comprehensive Plan and ,d use requirements. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES + Establish mutually agreed upon development standards with King County for proposed development within potential annexation areas. + Review neighboring jurisdictions' Comprehensive Plans December 2008 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Annexation Interjurisdictional Policies 6.1.7 Establish appropriate interlocal agreements that provide solutions to regional concerns, including but not limited to water, wastewater, storm and surface water drainage, transportation, parks and open space, development review, and public safety. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES • Interlocal agreements with neighboring jurisdictions and negotiation with property owners to eliminate boundary anomalies • Coordination with city's annexation area 6.1.8 Allow existing public servicesfor utilities outside, 1111y im h when there is a need created by boundary ad* V, between Tukwila and adjacent jurisdictions 0 1 su temporar is necessary because of an em' y service IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY + Initiate discussions and negotiat' a cent and regional jurisdictions to es,,r� a s and ur procedures to resolve uri h n oncerns ;1S.RX December 2008 69 135 TUKWILA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Annexation Oe 70 December 2008 136 Tukwila International Boulevard District Element - PC Recommended Draft, Version 8.18.15 ATTACHMENT B Issues Matrix 8.18.15 Row Page # Comment Exhibit #J (language changes in strike0ut /u6derl1n4, recommendation in, Date /Source Staff Staff comment /analy / goons bold), General Comments in Support far TIB District Element TIB Element Supportive of goals and policies in the TIB District Element. B. Meredith, Comment noted. No change requested. 1 Supports making TIB District vibrant, as envisioned in the Forterra; CC public Element. hearing, 8.10.15 TIB Element Likes the support for additional activity in the TIB area. S.Kruize; email sent Comment noted. No change requested. 2 Especially notes sidewalks on 42nd Ave - sometimes uses this 8.10.15 street to walk to the light rail station. General Comments TIB Neighborhood Security and affordable housing are important for the N. Wagafe; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. 3 community and neighborhood. Proud of TIB neighborhood hearing, 8.10.15 where she lives. Sidewalks Sidewalks are critical for making community. B.Wu; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. 4 hearing, 8.10.15 The draft element addresses the importance of sidewalks in linking the community to TIB and to other activity centers. Increasing Density Concerned about increasing density on TIB - may cause an D.Puki; CC public Staff Response: City is currently taking considerable efforts to decrease crime and & Crime increase in crime. hearing, 8.10.15 increase safety in the TIB area. Adding housing, stores, services and offices along 5 TIB, particularly in the ground floor spaces of buildings, will bring "more eyes on the street" and help reduce crime. Vision Vision, Goals & Pleased that the draft TIB District Element very closely matches P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Policies the vision developed by TIBAC (see comment letter for TIBAC hearing and letter vision). We spent two years discussing, reconsidering, and dated 8.10.15 ultimately adopting The Boulevard: Our Vision for the Future 6 which we presented to the Tukwila City Council a little over three years ago in April 2012. Ask yourselves if this Comp Plan will help make this vision a reality. 7 Throughout element City has limited funds to cover many competing needs and K.Hougardy; CC Staff Recommendation: No action at this time. projects. Need to take a look at the cost of policies and worksession, 7.28.15 The Comprehensive Plan is meant to be part aspirational and part directive, proposed implementation measures. providing a vision for the community and associated guidance for public and private actions over the next 20 years. It is intended to be the basis from which capital improvements, projects and programs can be identified and developed over time. Once the plan is adopted, staff can bring forward a list of implementation projects to be considered along with associated costs. Using that list, combined with the Comp Plan goals and policies, available funds & resources, and other input, Council can determine which projects, if any, to include in the City's CIP. 8 Pg 4, Fig 1. TIB The northern portions of the District (north of S. 139th and S. P.Carter; CC public Staff Response: The TIB District boundary was initially taken from the TIB boundary District Boundary 140th Sts.) do not really have a relationship to TIB as they are hearing and letter set in the 1997 Pacific Highway Revitalization Plan: SR 599 to the north, 42nd Ave S Map separated from TIB due to their topography. The western dated 8.10.15; to the east, S. 160th St to the south, and the City limits to the west. During the 2015 portion is on a hillside and only one street, S. 132nd St., K.Hougardy; email joint City Council /Planning Commission worksessions, excluding the area north of provides access to TIB. To the east, only S. 130th St. provides dated 8.12.14 130th along TIB was discussed, as the zoning /uses north of that (C /LI & MIC) were access to the residential area that is below TIB. By comparison, very different from those to the south. Continued discussion at the PC meetings the neighborhoods east of 42nd Ave. S. are more directly resulted in the boundaries in the PC- recommended draft element, including the affected by conditions along TIB, yet are not part of the District. expansion of the boundary from S. 130th St north to S 126th St so that it included What is the reasoning for including these areas in the District? the upper corner of the Riverton neighborhood. The area mentioned in the comment is somewhat disconnected from TIB. See attached map. One option for consolidating similar areas is to move the northern boundary further south on TIB, to the Regional Commercial zoning straddling the corner of S. 139th/140th & TIB. Moving south from there, the west boundary could follow the Medium & High Density Residential (MDR & HDR) zoning boundaries to Military. To the east, follow S. 140th St eastward to 42 Ave S, and continue south from there. It should be noted that the Residential Neighborhoods Element will still be the primary guide for land use in the Riverton and Cascade View neighborhoods. If this boundary change is made, the following would need to be revised or deleted: Under the Land Use Outside the Nodes section - they refer to parcels that would fall outside the TIB District. : - (p. 18) policies 8.2.14 & 8.2.15 - revise - (p. 20) the 1st bullet under Implementation Strategies - delete - (p. 20) the last implementation strategy bullet referring to the possible location of the northern gateway for the District - revise. Under Walkability & Connectivity Section: - (p. 31) 2nd Implementation Strategy bullet re: adding stairs connecting Southgate Creek to TIB - delete. FYI, this would be generally covered in Parks Element. 9 Pg 5, Vision 2nd paragraph - aspirational Vision statement. Some text is not Staff edits; 8.17.15 Staff Recommendation: Format entire 2nd paragraph using italic font. Statement formatted correctly. 10 Pg 12, Land Use, Goal 8.2. 1 support using nodes of more intensive development. P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Goals TIBAC came to the realization that different areas had distinct hearing and letter characteristics. Jdated 8.10.15 W: \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \TIB District Comment Matrix_8.10.15.xlsx 137 1 11 Land use /Nodes Wants to preserve the single family neighborhood. Concerned D.Puki and B.Wu; CC Comment noted. No change requested. Concept about expanding MDR & HDR zoning from TIB into single family public hearing, Staff Response: If the City wants to create a transit - oriented development node at neighborhoods. 8.10.15 the light rail station, it should consider planning for higher densities /intensities within a 1/2 mile walking distance of the station. This could include allowing higher densities in areas currently zoned for lower density residential uses. However, this level of detail and analysis should occur at the implementation phase, after this Element is adopted. At that time, discussions should include where & when higher densities should be allowed, and focus on how to sensitively transition the form & scale of more intensively developed areas to adjacent single family neighborhoods. Also, note that the preservation and enhancement of single - family and stable multi- family neighborhoods is called for in Residential Neighborhoods Element Policy 7.1.1. 12 Pg 13, Fig. 2 TIB This figure clearly shows the relationship and general location P.Carter; CC public Comment Noted. No change requested. District "Node of the two nodes. However, it is also important to see how hearing and letter FYI, walk distances of up to a half -mile for light rail and quarter -mile for bus are Concept" close together the two nodes are. See Figure below. Note that dated 8.10.15 generally accepted as baseline standards. The figure below was created for the the SRO property south of SR 518 is within a % mile of the light Right Size Parking analysis. The lighter color shading shows 1/2 mile walking rail station. distance from the light rail station. The general rule of thumb is that most people are willing to walk % to catch transit. Usually % mile is the furthest people will walk to transit. Note that S. 146th St. (the south side of Saar's market) is approximately % mile from the light rail station. The figure below shows: - Green Circle 1/4 mile radius - Blue circle 1/2 mile radius i ro , rr � f I � f 1 y 71r¢/4 �' 1� 2 , / i?¢, � "�irl "' v'r ,- ° I x ¢1¢ ��¢°�,fiil�' 'r , d + s z bl¢ 1�9 r � I N �/ r 'r fz�R °�� t r 4' ATT rd�i f /Hl ,� , , , �1 � r �� ¢`r 00 + „ i isrr '9¢i"5 1 r ry °ni Zts % �'�� % l dl' OF / ¢ ' µ p�N� 1,.; irferdua; Y/ 1 f'r, // J9e !✓P ,7 "4 „F /) # % %fgll "M 2'%,. �” h a �ry,ry�,�w ( � � �. f o A�iH��'l_, VW7 'Lf WIY P, / / OV T o ,, ,, ,,,,ti ,,, �.i dl to it •' i F Ji, it �, 9 i,,,,, i. `,,,, o, ? /i ,a h, prc d f ",� � �� ; f • Ito, � � '. srFrrPw,,.,�:�� „�,,., / a" ,,, / e 7l .:,� / l Mph � �r, / / /%' 7r �i ^ gyp. ,„q,,.,, r V r(.,, m, 4➢Y1"»/ a, rN /j� yU/ �M ^�a , ,,, / I .,.,,w. %, .-,? ,✓ +// IyJYJ/ 21J2! //! /r "!J /tI1��J� � r // %r J000 pI %isjp % /l %fr/1 r %7d,:JlD,1r�i% l4X�lXd7YlY�iI% 666 /l / /nl 1 /DAfflJlr/ 110 rb, 00 rye', � n fi ,,,;,, / r f / r )111. If ( 1 f j 'G� EGGy ,rm r a'a""www,.w�wwvw.., aoi r r� J f 1 r gr ,Mµ � rt� 1 gq P j 9 r hC �� y�� 1�l f��(nN �9i // /R r I ( f 9 116%RO„`IUOI � N ' M, n h,r j 13 Pgs 14 -16, TOD Node The area within walking distance from the Tukwila light rail C. Kim; CC public Commented noted. No changes required. policies & station could provide housing for more people who want to hearing, 8.10.15, and Policy 8.2.4 and suggested implementation measures designate the TOD Node area implementation take advantage of: 1) the easy commute via light rail & buses to letter received for a more intensive, transit - oriented mix of uses, and encourages the use of strategies; and Pgs downtown & other areas of King County, 2) Westfield 8.12.15. incentives for an increased height allowance. The current draft also recommends 19 -20, Land Use Southcenter Mall, 3) SeaTac Airport, and 4) easy access to I -5, I- raising maximum heights outside of the nodes, in the areas currently zoned Outside the Nodes, 405, and Hwy 518. More people residing in the area will also Regional Commercial (RC) and Neighborhood Commercial Center (NCC). Exploring policies help to revitalize retail stores along TIB. the use of height incentives in these areas is also encouraged. City needs to allow an increase in density within current high Goal 8.5 and the associated policies and implementation measures call for density zoning. Current zoning allows only 21.5 units /acre with exploring and establishing lower parking requirements for uses in proximity to light two parking spaces required per unit. New development on rail and transit, and looking for other ways to accommodate parking requirements, these properties with such limits are not financially feasible due such as through cooperative parking agreements and on- street parking. to high land costs per unit and the lowest rental rate within King County. Any rezoning of properties would take place after the draft element is adopted, and would include significant community involvement. 14 Pg 15, I agree the Urban Renewal Overlay (URO) boundaries should be P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Implementation adjusted to facilitate development. I encourage you to take the hearing and letter This relates to an implementation strategy, and would occur after the draft TIB Strategies, Village % mile radius into account when revising the boundaries. dated 8.10.15 District Element is adopted. Node, 2nd bullet 15 Pg 16, I'm not sure what a conference /training center would bring to P.Carter; CC public As background, this was included in the consultant recommendations (at the Implementation the Village Node. My experience is that attendee's meals are hearing and letter 2.25.15 joint CC /PC worksession on the draft TIB District Element) as a strategy to Strategies for Village catered, and they leave the center immediately after the dated 8.10.15 create a community "third place" at the Village Node. Node, bullet above meeting. What we need is more activity on the street and the sidebar box patrons for our local businesses. Staff Recommendation: Revise the implementation strategy bullet to read "Explore options for a traditional anchor (+ e.g., a grocery store eF eenfe.,.ne tFai. ing eente ), as well as the potential for attracting or facilitating an unconventional anchor.... ". W:)0Nange Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \TIB District Comment Matrix_8.10.15.xlsx 16 Pg 16, It is vitally important that the City develop a vision and master P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Implementation plan for this area so the City is ready if a developer comes hearing and letter This relates to an implementation strategy, and would occur after the draft TIB Strategies, TOD along. Someone could be looking to do a development outside dated 8.10.15 District Element is adopted. Node, 1st bullet of but near to Seattle. If we don't have zoning, etc. in place, that person would just go to another city such as Renton or Burien where it's easy to determine what type of development would be allowed. 17 Pg 18, Land Use Note that unless otherwise specified, these policies are for the P.Carter; CC public Staff Response: Comment noted. These policies are intended to apply to parcels Outside the Nodes, entire TIB District outside of the nodes. hearing and letter close to the TIB corridor. It is assumed that the Residential Neighborhood Element policies dated 8.10.15 would address land use in the Cascade View and Riverton neighborhoods (Residential Neighborhoods Element Policy 7.1.1 calls for preserving & enhancing single family neighborhoods) . Consequently, the TIB District element can be considered an "overlay" to those areas, primarily concerned with linking these neighborhoods to the services, activities and resources in proximity of the TIB Corridor. The TIB District goals and policies are also focused on creating sensitive transitions between the higher density commercial /mixed use development along TIB and the adjacent single family homes (e.g., Policy 8.2.13). If the TIB District boundary is tightened, and the master planning & zoning is completed for the remainder of the District along TIB (assuming a 1/2 mile walking distance from the light rail station and 1/4 mile walking distance from S. 144th /TIB intersection), there may not be much remaining between the nodes for these policies to address. However, until implementation occurs, and /or if redevelopment takes place in phases, then these policies can be used to guide development. Staff Recommendation: Revise this section's title to clarify where these policies are applicable: "Land Use in Commercial and Multifamily Areas Outside the Nodes." 18 Pg 18, Land Use I don't believe that opportunities for retail should be expanded P.Carter; CC public Staff Recommendation: No change required. Outside the Nodes, into the residential neighborhoods of the District. hearing and letter See above comment - this policy applies to commercial and multifamily properties Policy 8.2.10 dated 8.10.15 outside the Nodes. 19 Pg 18, Land Use Light industrial may be appropriate on commercial properties P.Carter; CC public Staff Recommendation: Revise as follows: "On commercial properties along or near Outside the Nodes, along or near TIB, it is not appropriate in residential hearing and letter TIB, aAllow those types of industrial uses that require hands -on labor and operate Policy 8.2. 11 neighborhoods. dated 8.10.15 in such a manner that no nuisance factor is created and the scale of such activities does not conflict with the TIB District vision of a walkable, pedestrian- oriented neighborhood." 20 Pg 18, Land Use I support this policy and would remind you that most areas P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Outside the Nodes, outside the nodes where multifamily housing will be built are hearing and letter Policy 8.2.13 not on TIB. In other words, they may be on side streets off of dated 8.10.15 TIB. 21 Pg 18, Land Use TIB between S. 128th and S. 137th Sts, with the exception of the P.Carter; CC public Staff Response: Delete this policy. Preservation of single - family neighborhoods is Outside the Nodes, Sierra Sue Apartments,. is not predominantly residential in use hearing and letter reflected in Policy 7.1.1 in the Residential Neighborhoods Element: "Maintain a Policy 8.2.14 or character. So this statement should be rewritten to apply to dated 8.10.15 comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of the residential neighborhoods away from TIB. single - family and stable multi - family neighborhoods; eliminates incompatible land uses; and clearly establishes applicable development requirements through recognizable boundaries. Note, if the TIB District Boundary is tightened, then the residential neighborhoods between S. 128th and S. 137th Streets would fall outside of the District, and this policy should also be deleted. 22 Pg 18, Land Use I support this strategy to explore other zoning for these parcels P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Outside the Nodes, such as the former Bernie & Boys site. At TIBAC we had a lot of hearing and letter However, if TIB District boundary is tightened, this policy would be deleted as it Policy 8.2.15. discussion about these parcels. We noted that: "For most of this dated 8.10.15 would fall outside of the District. segment, the topography limits the amount of developable property that accesses the Boulevard, and most of the single - family homes are grade- separated from the Boulevard. For those reasons, we support a compatible mix of businesses and residential development." I would also encourage you look at the sentence about affordable housing then read the strategy on the top of page 21. If housing were to be developed on any of these parcels, I wouldn't have a problem with ground floor living units. In fact, requiring retail or office on the ground floor would almost ensure that housing would not be built on any of these parcels. 23 Pg 19, Land Use Want a policy added to encourage aggregation of small A.Ekberg; CC Staff Recommendation: Add the following Policy - Encourage the aggregation of Outside the Nodes, commercially -zoned parcels fronting TIB for redevelopment. worksession, 7.28.15 commercially zoned properties fronting TIB with adjacent commercially zoned properties to enhance the opportunities for redevelopment. policies Add the following Implementation Strategy to support this policy: Explore incentives, programs, and regulations that could be used to encourage parcel aggregation. 24 Pg 19, Land Use Gateways should also include the name of the district as P.Carter; CC public Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested: "Create gateways to provide a sense Outside the Nodes, mentioned in the first Implementation Strategy as shown on hearing and letter of arrival at the north and south edges of the TIB Corridor. Use architectural and Policy 8.2.18. page 35. They could also include banners. So revise this to read. dated 8.10.15 landscape elements, along with signage and banners, to mark transitions and "Use architectural and landscape elements along with signage entrances into and within the TIB District ...." and banners to mark transitions..." W: \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \TIB District Comment Matrix_8.10.15.xlsx 139 3 25 Pg 20, Land Use The area will remain as is without much improvement unless C. Kim; CC public Staff Response: A version of the following policy was in the "old" Transportation Outside the Nodes, the City further reduces prostitution and drug traffic along TIB. hearing, 8.10.15, and Corridors Element but was deleted because the City has adopted regulations Implementation Closure of Deja Vu around 150th St, which has been a magnet letter dated 8.12.15. governing the location of adult entertainment uses. If desired, the following Strategies for prostitution and related criminal activities, will help greatly implementation strategy could be added back to the "Land Use Outside of Nodes" to reduce criminal activities. Section: Explore appropriate actions for the City to take to pursue amortization of 26 Pg 20, Land Use Outside the Nodes, Implementation Strategies, Last bullet 27 Pg 21, Land Use Outside the Nodes, Implementation Strategies, Bullet at top of page. Re: gateway locations. If the TIB District Boundary is tightened, Staff edits; 8.17.15 Staff Response: If the boundary changes, revise the implementation strategy as the possible northern gateway location mentioned here would follows: "Identify appropriate locations for a gateway on the north and south end fall outside the District. o the TIB District corridor. r,.... ide-. the Gity , ..,Red .,-., aRt nar .,.l RR th ;R. thwE This strategy should be removed. Remember, it applies to the P.Carter; CC public IThis implementation strategy is intended to apply to multifamily buildings adjacent entire TIB District including the area outside the nodes. We hearing and letter to TIB with ground floor living spaces. The Planning Commission's concerns were have many stand -alone apartment buildings, such as both dated 8.10.15 related to the livability of these spaces, including safety & privacy, along a street Samara buildings, with ground floor living units. with higher vehicle and foot traffic. Staff Recommendation: Revise the implementation strategy as follows: €XP4eFe ivability of ground floor living spaces along TIB 28 P 24, Urban Form, The last line has a typo: "tothe" needs a space inserted. P.Carter; CC public Staff Recommendation: Revise the last line in Policy 8.4.2 as suggested: "...adjacent Policy 8.4.2. hearing and letter to the front sidewalk." dated 8.10.15 29 Pg 24, Urban Form, As an example of a continuous building wall with off - street P.Carter; CC public Comment noted. No change requested. Policy 8.4.2. parking, see my Figure 2. It shows an L- shaped building with hearing and letter parking behind and alongside building. dated 8.10.15 Figure: Central Avenue Plaza in Kent on Central Ave S. just south of its intersection with W. Smith St. 30 Pg 25, Urban Form, Given the competition for parking in the vicinity of the TIB light J.Scorcio, Implementation rail station, on both sides of International Blvd. /TIB, it may be Community & Econ. Strategies, last premature to consider removing parking minimums. It may be Development bullet. more appropriate to consider parking maximums as a transition Director, City of to a less auto - centric, more pedestrian oriented district. SeaTac; letter dated 8.17.15 Removing parking minimums was a consultant recommendation at the 2015 joint City Council /Planning Commission worksession. Staff Recommendation: Revise this implementation strategy as follows: "In the TIB District, explore the feasibility of various ways to manage parking, including removing parking minimums and allowing the market to determine parking need, 31 Pg 26, Urban Form, SeaTac supports the implementation strategy "Coordinate J.Scorcio, Comment of support and possible future coordination is noted. Implementation parking standards with the City of SeaTac to ensure Community & Econ. Strategies, 1st bullet, conformity ", and believes based on recent discussions among Development last sub - bullet. our respective Council members that there are other areas Director, City of where our two cities could coordinate, including some elements SeaTac; letter dated of street scape design on Military Road. 8.17.15 32 Pg 26, Urban Form, Add implementation measure about preparing a feasibility A.Ekberg; CC Staff Recommendation: Add the following Implementation Strategy: Prepare a Implementation study for a parking structure. worksession, 7.28.15 study investigating the overall feasibility of developing a public parking structure Strategies within the TIB District, including identifying potential sites. 33 Pg 31, Walkability & See figures below for examples of woonerfs in residential areas. P.Carter; CC public Staff Recommendation: Add these figures to the draft TIB District Element as Connectivity, hearing and letter examples of woonerfs. Implementation Figures: Woonerfs where users share the street without dated 8.10.15 Strategies, 1st bullet. boundaries such as lanes and curbs. 34 Community & The City talks about trying to build community. Should have an P. Larson; CC public Comment noted. No change required. Character section, international festival in the TIB area celebrating the hearing, 8.10.15 Pg, 32, Goal 8.7 and associated policies under "Community & Character" call for pg. 32 multicultural diversity of the District. similar activities that promote and build upon the multicultural character of the TIB District. 35 Public & Private Add policy statement indicating Tukwila will be flexible in A.Ekberg; CC Staff Recommendation: Add the following new Policy to page 38, under the topic Investment section, considering different types of uses or development that may worksession, 7.28.15 area Public and Private Investment, Goal 8.10: The City shall remain flexible in pg. 37 not have been considered in the goals and policies. considering and responding to emerging development opportunities in the TIB W:\y4ange Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \CC Hearing -- 8.10.15 \TIB District Comment Matrix_8.10.15.xlsx 4 W 142 From: sandra kruize [mailto:sandrakruize @vahoo.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 4:44 PM To: Laura Benjamin Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing - August 10, 2015 Dear Laura, Thank you very much for informing me more specifically. I was looking for more "nuts and bolts." This confirms my reading of an affirmatively worded plan for LDR neighborhoods; and, I will look for a notice of when codes will be evaluated in support of this plan. I did look at the International Blvd. map for the noted area updating. It looks excellent on paper to acknowledge the need to support more activity. Especially, I note the sidewalks on 42nd ave. I live near the Link Rail station and participate sometimes in the walk on 42nd ave to the station. can't attend tonight, but please pass my comment, if possible. Thanks, Sandra Kruize On Monday, August 10, 2015 10:22 AM, Laura Benjamin < Laura.Beniamin(a)TukwilaWA.gov> wrote: Mrs. Kruize. Thank you for checking -in regarding the updates to the Residential Neighborhoods Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan aims to create lasting value in the Tukwila community be creating a vision for how it will manage growth and development over the next 20 years. The Plan acts as a guide for the regulations the City adopts, including revisions to the zoning code. I have copied the draft Goal, Policies, and Implementation Strategies that pertain to compatibility in single - family neighborhoods, including the size and height of homes (see below). These policies will act as a guide for revising the zoning code, which will get into the "nuts and bolts" of capability such as the maximum height in the LDR zone, and massing of larger homes. The zoning code update is scheduled to begin in 2016. As mentioned in previous emails, the City Council is holding a public hearing on the updates to the Tukwila International Boulevard District, Housing, and Residential Neighborhoods elements of the Comprehensive Plan this evening, August 10th at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Residents are encouraged to share their thoughts on the draft updates. You may also submit written comment by 5: 00 p.m., today, August 10tH Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. Best, Laura Laura Benjamin Assistant PlannerlCity of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100ITukwila, WA 98188 206. 433. 71661Laura .Beniamina- TukwilaWa.gov Tukwila: The City of opportunity, the community of choice. Goal 7.4 Neighborhood Development Tukwila's residential neighborhoods have a high - quality, pedestrian character with a variety of housing options for residents in all stages of life. Single - Family Residential Development Policies 7.4.3 Support single - family residential in -fill housing that is in harmony with the existing neighborhood as a means of achieving adequate, affordable, and /or diverse housing. 7.4.4 Encourage single - family residence design to foster a sense of safety and security. 7.4.5 Develop neighborhood- specific single - family regulations that encourage compatibility with the existing scale of residential structures in the neighborhood, provide an appropriate relationship of lot area, building scale, and building siting, and maintain a sense of community (e.g. mature trees, pedestrian scale, sensitive transition between public and private spaces). Implementation Strategies 143 ■ Revise development regulations at the neighborhood level to reflect the historic development patterns of neighborhoods and to develop regulations that best fit the unique development characteristics of neighborhoods. • Develop a process for residents to participate in developing regulations for individual neighborhoods. • Revise code to maintain standard minimum lot size of 6,500 SF but allow smaller lot areas subject to design standards that mitigate the potential negative impacts of smaller lots. From: sandra kruize [ mailto:sandrakruizea- yahoo.coml Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 2:17 PM To: Laura Benjamin; Rebecca Fox Subject: Re: Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing - August 10, 2015 Thank -you for the reminders you sent to me. I did, last week, read the updated comprehensive plan related to residential neighborhoods, specifically how new housing would fit in to the size of existing homes and the character of existing low density neighborhoods. I had been active in wanting change toward compatibility as it pertained to size and height in comparison with other houses. I apologize if I am being opaque or lax, but I couldn't find any references to planned changes. What I was able to find was that house size would be one half the size of the lot and that it should be in character with the existing neighborhood. didn't see any reference to height; and, this was a critical issue in my past involvement. I can't comment on changes without going back to what the codes were at that time and comparing them to the recommended changes. Can you please clarify this for me. Will there be change to size and height codes in LDR neighborhoods as related to compatibility issue. If so, please compare. Thank -you so much, Sandra Kruize On Monday, July 20, 2015 1:36 PM, Laura Benjamin < Laura.Beniamin(o)TukwilaWA.gov> wrote: Comprehensive Plan Update City Council Public Hearing on the Tukwila International Boulevard District, Housing, and Residential Neighborhoods Elements August 10, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Tukwila City Hall — Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. July 27, 2015 — Work Session: Prior to the hearing, the City Council will hold a work session on July 27, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to review the Planning Commission recommended drafts of the updated Introduction, Vision, Glossary, and Land Use Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan. Community members are invited to listen and observe the work session. July 28, 2015 — Work Session: Prior to the hearing, the City Council will hold a work session on July 28, 2015 at 5:30 p.m. in Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. to review the Planning Commission recommended drafts of the updated Tukwila International Boulevard District Element, Housing Element, and Residential Neighborhoods Element. Community members are invited to listen and observe the work session. August 10, 2015 — Public Hearing: The Tukwila City Council will hold a public hearing on Monday August 10, 2015 on the proposed updates to the Tukwila International Boulevard District Element, Housing Element, Residential Neighborhoods Element, Introduction, Vision, Glossary, and Land Use Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan. You are invited to share your ideas on proposed policy changes that will affect future development. What: Tukwila City Council hearing When: Monday August 10, 2015 — 7:00 p.m. Where: Tukwila City Hall — City Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd., Tukwila Comments: You are invited to comment on proposed changes to the Tukwila International Boulevard District Element, Housing Element, Residential Neighborhoods Element, Introduction, Vision, Glossary and Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan at the public hearing or submit written comments by 5 p.m. on the day of the hearing, August 10, 144 2015. After receiving public comments, the City Council will review comments and make revisions as needed, with final action during Fall, 2015. Review materials: See the draft elements at http:// www. tukwilawa .gov /dcd /dcdcompplan.html, under the "Meetings & Events" tab, or at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100; Tukwila, WA 98188. August 24, 201 — Council Review: The City Council will discuss public hearing comments and make revisions as needed for the Tukwila International Boulevard District, Housing, Residential Neighborhood elements, and the Introduction, Vision, Glossary, and Land Use Map Legend of the Comprehensive Plan on August 24, 2015 at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Community members are invited to listen and observe the review session. For more information: Contact Rebecca Fox at 206 - 431 -3683, or at CompPlanUpdatea- TukwilaWA.gov You are receiving this email because you have expressed interest in the Comprehensive Plan update. 145 From: Nora Gierloff To: Lynn Miranda; Laura Benjamin; Rebecca Fox Subject: FW: Some questions for the matrix Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:19:18 PM More for the matrix From: Kathy Hougardy Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 2:07 PM To: Nora Gierloff Cc: Kate Kruller; Laurel Humphrey; Pam Carter (pmcarter @jps.net) Subject: Some questions for the matrix Hi Nora, Here are some questions for the Matrix. You may already have them, but just in case, I'll list them here. Could we put some more parameters around "affordable housing ?" What does that look like? For me, the term is too general for me to get a sense of what our goals are. Does affordable housing include home ownership? What are some examples of that? Is the plan for us to add affordable rental housing, increasing our total percentage of rental properties in Tukwila, or to replace existing substandard rental housing as the opportunities arise? I do have some concerns about stability of our neighborhoods and the effects on our schools, if we increase the total percentage of rentals in the city. I think it would be helpful to be more specific regarding the term "diversity in housing stock." What happens if we don't meet the Growth Management Act goals or other similar goals from county, state and federal government agencies? A comment was made at the Public Hearing expressing concern regarding the boundaries of the TIB redevelopment area. Do you have background on why the decision was made to set the boundaries to include large areas of Cascade View and Lower Riverton? Comments were made about community outreach. Would it be appropriate have another outreach to the community regarding the final version of the housing /TIB /neighborhood elements of the comprehensive plan, due to its impact on our residents? I may have some more questions; I'll e -mail them if and when I do. I'm at City Hall and left my Comp plan book at home. When I review it I may think of something else. Thank you! Kathy Hougardy 146 Kathy / lougardy I ukwila Oly (ouncil 147 RECEIVED AUG 12 2015 onim uma To Council Members of City of Tukwila. Devebpment My name is Chu[ Kim. I have purchased 40 units apartment located at 3721 S 152nd St.,Tukwila in 1982 from a builder during lease up phase after the buildings were just completed. After I purchased the property in 1982 1 found the area along the International Blvd., northward, deteriorated steadily by becoming corridor of drugs and prostitutions. Thus, the property could not attract high quality tenants especially with the Rainbow Trailer Court, which looks like a slum, located just north of the property. Fortunately for the area Tukwila Light Rail station opened several years ago. Also, city has closed down three motels near S. 144th Street which should help to reduce criminal activities along the International Blvd. Even though many four to six story apartments went up and more are on the way near Othello and Columbia City light rail stations, after the light rail went into operation, I do not see any changes near walking distance from the Tukwila Light Rail station. The area within walking distance from the Tukwila light rail station could provide housing for more people who want to take advantages of 1. Tukwila Light Rail Station with major Metro Transit buses which provide easy commute to down town Seattle and large areas of King County. 2. Westfield Soundcenter Regional Shopping Center 3. Seatac Airport 4. Easy access to 1-5,1-405 and Hwy 518. More people residing within the area will also help to revitalize retail stores along the International Blvd. However, the area will remain as is without much improvement unless city undertake the following steps. 1. Further reduce prostitution and drugs traffics along the International Blvd. Closure of Dejavu Show Girls around S 150th Street, which has been a magnet for prostitution and related criminal activities, will help greatly to reduce criminal activities. Also, closing or relocating the Rainbow Trailer park and other properties which looks like slum will be helpful. 2. Allow increase in density within current High Density Zoning Current high density zoning allows only 21.5 units per acre with two parking spaces required per unit. New developments within the high density zoned properties with such limits are financially not feasible due to high land cost per unit and the lowest rental rate within King county. Thus, city need to allow higher density than currently allowed to make it financially feasible for developments. MR .: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT a PLANNING DIVISION August 17, 2015 4800 South 1881' Street SeaTac, WA 98188 -8605 SUBJECT: Comments on Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements City Mall: 206.973.4800 Fax: 206.973,4809 TDD: 206.973.4808 Ms. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner Tukwila Planning and Recycling 6300 Southeenter Boulevard Tukwila WA 98188 Dear Rebecca, The City of SeaTac appreciates the opportunity to review and comment on the Draft Tukwila International Boulevard (TIB) District Element, the Housing Element, and the Residential Neighborhoods Element of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan update. Overall we find these draft elements to be well thought out policy documents, consistent with regional plans and policies, that should set the stage to move your city forward into the future. We would however like to offer comments on a couple of points: • Regarding implementation strategies under Policy 8.5.2 (TIB District Element), given the competition for parking in the vicinity of the TIB light rail station, on both sides of International Boulevard /Tukwila International Boulevard, it may be premature to consider removing parking minimums. It may be more appropriate to consider parking maximums as a transition to a less auto - centric, more pedestrian oriented district. • We support the implementation. strategy on page 26 to "coordinate parking Mayor standards with the City of SeaTac to ensure uniformity," and believe based on Mia Gregerson recent discussions among our respective Council members that there are other areas where our two cities could coordinate, including some elements of street Deputy Mayor Tony Anderson scape design along Military Road. Councilmembers Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment. We look forward to Barry Ladenburg Kathryn Campbell Forking with you. Terry Anderson Dave Bush Pam Fernald City Manager Todd Cutts City Attorney Mary Mirante Bartolo City Clerk Kristina Gregg .: If you have any questions, please contact Senior Planner Michael Searcy at nLi q�! Ley.Cq2ci.seatae.wa.tis. Sincerely, ;'j! —Z Joseph Sc r C *10, X-1 C-P'" Community and Economic Development Director 150 ATTACHMENT C Housing Element - Planning Commission Recommended Version 6.26.15 Revision Matrix 8.19.15 Note: Comments listed without an exhibit reference were delivered verbally during the public hearing on 8.10.15. GENERAL COMMENTS Row # Page'# Comment Exhibit # /Date /source staff co erit / analysis /options Households in the Somali community are larger, averaging Comment noted. Implementation Strategies 6 to 8 people per household. This under Goal 3.2 inlcude language to develop and should be incorporated into Hamdi Abdulle, Council maintain housing that meets the needs of the 11 NA policy decisions. Hearing, 8.10.15 communiyt, including household size. Does affordable housing include home ownership? What are Email from CM See attached Housing Element Definitions 2 NA some examples of that? Hougardy, dated 8.12.15 handout. It would be helpful to be more specific regarding the term Email from CM See attached Housing Element Definitions 31 NA "diversity in the housing stock" Hougardy, dated 8.12.15 handout. It would be helpful to have defintions and more information on the terms "affordable hsouign ", "diversity of housing ", CP Kruller, Council See attached Housing Element Definitions 41 NA land "diversity." Idiscussion, 8.10.15 Ihandout. COMMENTS ON G0ALS /P0LICIE5/IMPLEMENTATIoN STRATEGIES Row # Page'# Comment Exhibit# /Date /source staff com erit /analysis /ciptic'ns Originally, the GMA mandated Comprehensive Plan updates were to be completed by 2011, with a 20 year planning horizon of 2031.The state pushed back the completion date to 2015 and has asked that the planning horizon be pushed back to 2035. As the other elements use the horizon year of 2031, staff used this date for the Housing Element to maintain consistency. However, a few sentences can be added to show that Tukwila can meet both the 2031 and 2035 growth rate housing capacities. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. New language in the second paragraph of Purpose to read "By 2035, Tukwila is projected to accommodate an additional 768 households and 2,480 new jobs, for a total of 5,568 new Extrapolate Tukwila's growth rate Letter from WA State households and 17,980 new jobs over the next from 2031 to 2035 and show Department of twenty years. Tukwila's zoning can there is still sufficient housing Commerce, dated accommodate this projected growth as the City 51 p.1 capacity. 7.22.15 has capacity for over 6,000 new housing units." Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Sentence now reads "These steps are necessary to plan for growth that will ensure the sustainability and vitality of the existing housing stock, to reduce barriers that prevent low and moderate income households from living near Revise last sentence of second their work or transit, and to preserve housing paragraph to focus on quality CM Robertson, Council that is affordable for all lew iReeme households, 61 p.1 I housing for all income levels. lWork Session, 7.28.15 lincluding low income households." 151 152 Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Include new information as an informational side bar. Side bar text to read "Total housing expenditures in excess of 30 percent of household income are considered "excessive" and viewed as an indicator of a housing affordability problem. This definition of affordability was established under the United States National Housing Act of 1937. Average housing costs -- $1191 for monthly rent of $992 for monthly housing payments for a three bedroom unit -- in Tukwila are affordable to households making at least 80% AMI, about $33,120 annually or $16.56 per hour. Many of the common occupations in Tukwila pay less than $16.56, these include: cashiers: $13.55; childcare workers: $11.59; food service workers: $12.25; and retail salesperson: $15.28. Occupations that provide a wage needed to afford market rate housing include book keeping clerk: $20.53; medical assistant: Include more information on $18.75; machinists: $25.82; and painters: what is meant by "affordable $19.86." Note there will also be an informational housing ". Include examples of sidebar with information on the King County different types /prices of housing Affordable Housing Targets. affordable to different CM Quinn, Council Work 7 p.2 incomes /professions. Session, 7.28.15 Put more parameters around See definition /additional information in Row 7. "affordable housing." What does Also, see Housing Element Definion handout. that look like? Term is too general to get a sense of what Email from CM 81 p.2 our goals are. Hougardy, dated 8.12.15 Revise last sentence under Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Housing Affordability to clarify Sentence now reads "Relying on market forces what is meant by "adequate to provide affordable housing for very -low quantity." Suggest referencing income residents will not provide adequate King County affordable housing CM Ekberg, Council quantity, as defined by King County affordable 91 p.2 targets. Work Session, 7.28.15 housing targets, of quality affordable housing." Staff Recommendation: Include additional language to reflect that housing options should accommodate seniors who wish to 'age in place' and those who wish to move to other types of Delete "hoping to 'age in place "' living units. Last sentence in Home Ownership from Home Ownership Options. Options to read "This range of housing options The current range of housing does not accommodate residents in all stages of options does not accommodate life, including young adults, multigenerational seniors who are looking for other Letter from Pam Carter, families, a444 older adults hoping to "age in 101 p.3 types of living units. dated 8.10.15 place ", and older adults looking to downsize." Do not support lowering the minimum lot size in single - family neighborhoods. Suggest revising City's lot size to meet King David Puki, Council III p.3 County minimum of 7,200 sf. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Lot size has changed since purchased property in Allentown. Originally platted 3,000 sf lots do not meet the current 6,500 sf lot Pat Malara, Council 121 p.3 minimum in LDR zone. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Strongly support reduced lot size Email from Hyojin 13 p.3 from 6500 sf to 6000 sf. Whitford, dated 8.16.15 Comment noted. Housing Element policy language does not Need to keep the current ratio of specify amounts of multifamily or single - family multifamily and single - family housing. The zoning code regualtes the density dwellings to mitigate transiency. and lot size of single and multifamily housing Instead of building more that can be constructed in different residential apartments, need to upgrade zones. Maintenance and rehabilitation of existing to better meet residents' Email from Jenny existing multi - family housing is addressed in 141 p.3 I needs. I McCoy, dated 8.13.15 1 Policy 3.4.2. 152 153 Concern as to how our current schools accommodate Tukwila's students, and whether this has been considered. Many of The City is in regular communication with Tukwila School District's Tukwila School District (TSD) and has shared the elementary schools are at Housing Background Report, including growth capacity. If the City plans to allow projections, and the draft Housing Element with more apartment buildings, multi- TSD staff. In the coming months, pursuant to a family residences, or even single- King County policy directive, the City will be family homes, we will need reaching out to the five school districts serving somewhere to put the children Tukwila residents (Tukwila, Highline, Renton, that inevitably come with new Email from Brenda Seattle, and Kent) regarding school capacity and 151 p.3 housing. Schenck, dated 8.16.15 housing /population growth. Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Second Implementation Strategy now reads Need to link the two "Following the public input process, consider Implementation Strategies under flexible zoning standards to allow prevailing lot Goal 3.1 to show that the first size to remain and smaller lot sized to be strategy on input from residents allowed 4 as decided by Council decision. and property owners will be Establish parameters for design characteristics followed by Council review and CM Quinn, Council Work such as height, lot coverage, home design 161 p.4 potential action. Session, 7.28.15 features, and setbacks." Need to clarify "if desired" to reflect that a change in lot sizes is CM Robertson, Council 17 p.4 a Council policy decision. Work Session, 7.28.15 Revision in Row 16 addresses this comment. Affordable housing acts as a driver for economic development. Support policies Marty Kooistra /Housing and implementation strategies to Development provide affordable housing for all Consortium, Council 181 p.4 residents. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Affordable housing is the most important issue in the Latino Reina community. Need for more Blandon /Community affordable apartments with 3+ Connectors, Council 191 p.4 bedrooms. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Naimo Wagafe /Community Affordable housing is very Connectors, Council 20 p.4 important. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Support Goal 3.2 and Policy 3.2.2 and corresponding Implementation Strategies. Development incentives encourage high quality affordable housing. Well built, solidly Alyssa Mehl /Bellwether managed affordable housing can Housing, Council 211 p.4 promote community cohesion. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Support Goal 3.2, 3.3, 3.5, and 3.6. Support a more diverse range of housing, specifically cottage housing. Project to develop owner - occupied homes affordabele to moderate and low - income households at the United Graydon Methodist Church property is not Manning /Homestead feasible under current zoning Community Land Trust, 221 p.4 code. Council Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Do not support changing the wording of this policy (3.2.1) as "diverse" is the right word. Diversity can refer to many Letter from Pam Carter, 231 p.4 attribute, not just racial diversity. dated 8.10.15 Comment noted. Support policies that are Becca equitable and promote Meredith /Forterra, 24 p.4 lafforclable housing. JCouncil Hearing, 8.10.15 lComment noted. 153 154 Clarify if plan is to add affordable rental housing, increasing our Draft policy language supports the creation of total percentage of rental new owner occupied and rental housing that is properties in Tukwila, or to affordable to a range of incomes, as well as replace existing substandard improving the existing affordable housing so that rental housing as the it may maintain its affordability while providing a opportunities arise. Concern higher quality living space. Bellwether Housing about stability of neighborhoods analyzed data on their affordable rental and the effects on schools, if properties and found lower turnover rates for increase the total percentage of Email from CM low- income renters living in quality affordable 251 p.4 rentals in the city. Hougardy, dated 8.12.15 housing. Affordable housing includes permitting mother -in -law apartments. My husband and I will be retiring and being able to rent our basement will make our mortgage payment more affordable as we anticipate a reduced income at time of Email from Jenny 261 p.4 retirement. McCoy, dated 8.13.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 3.2.6 now reads "Strive to make alternative and affordable housing options available for residents currently living in CM Ekberg, Council substandard housing, such as pre -HUD code 271 p.5 Reword Policy 3.2.6. Work Session, 7.28.15 mobile homes." Include detached accessory Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. dwelling units as a housing option Implementation Strategy now reads "Allow an to explore allowing in single CM Ekberg, Council attached or detached accessory dwelling unit, 28 p.5 family zones. Work Session, 7.28.15 " First bullet under Implementation Strategies, removed "attached" from description of ADUs. Public response at the Community Conversation events showed public support for detached ADUs Letter from Pam Carter, 291 p.5 if done carefully. dated 8.10.15 Revision in Row 28 addresses this comment. ADUs are a great solution for accommodating an older relative or a young family member because it allows them to live independently while being close enough for you to keep an eye on Letter from Pam Carter, 301 p.5 them. dated 8.10.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. The last sentence under the first New Implementation Strategy now reads Implementation Strategy should "Promote mixed -use developments with ground - be a stand alone Implementation CM Ekberg, Council level commercial space and residences at and 311 p.5 Strategy. Work Session, 7.28.15 above the street level in specified areas." Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Revise 6th bullet under Implementation Strategy now reads " Develop Implementation Strategies on specific statements regarding location, type, and development statements to characteristics of desired housing affordable to a include a variety of incomes and CM Robertson, Council variety of incomes to local for - profit and non- 321 p.5 different types of developers. Work Session, 7.28.15 profit developers." Sixth bullet under Implementation Strategies, wording recommended by the Planning Commission should be maintained. By specifying the type and characteristics of the housing, as well as the location, Tukwila will be assured that affordable housing is attractive and integrated into our Letter from Pam Carter, 331 p.5 Icommunity. I dated 8.10.15 lComment noted. 154 155 Chu) M. Kim, Council Trailer homes in the TIB area Hearing, 8.10.15; Letter Policy 3.2.6 addresses substandard housing, 34 p.5 should be relocated. dated 8.12.15 including mobile homes. Comment noted. Second bullet under The now expired Housing Options Program (TMC Implementation Strategies, 18.120) was intended to be a limited, pilot remove both instances of program. Many cities have demonstrated "limited." The previous success with a limited demonstration /pilot demonstration project was overly cottage housing program, and then renewed and cautious and restrictive. If we revised the program using lessons learned to continue in this vein, we will have expand the program and to promote successful, the same results, no cottage Letter from Pam Carter, compatible development. Staff 351 p.5 housing. dated 8.10.15 Recommendation: Keep as is. As a signatory of the Growing Transit Communities Regional Compact, the City of Tukwila has the opportunity to demonstrate a commitment in its compehensive plan to promoting thriving and equitable transit - oriented development. The plan addresses Staff Recommendation: Revise Implementation this committment in the TIB Strategy (third bullet) under Goal 3.2 to District element and could be specifically address transit - oriented further strengthened by including development. Implementation Strategy now policies or discussion that reads "Explore increasing density in areas specifically address transit- Letter from Puget Sound supported by transit to ehance transit- oriented oriented development in the Regional Council (PSRC), development, and /or in proximity to high- 361 p.5 Housing element. dated 8.11.15 employment areas." Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 3.3.3 now reads "Continue supporting very -low, low- and moderate income housing, as defined by King County income levels, to Policy 3.3.3, clarify how "very- address the countywide need by supporting low, low- and moderate - income" CM Ekberg, Council regional affordable housing development and 371 p.6 are defined. Work Session, 7.28.15 preservation efforts." Include new Implementation Strategy to reflect current Council work to adopt healthy housing code (National Healthy Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Housing Standard) in addition to New Implementation Strategy now reads the International Property CM Seal, Council Work "Explore adoption and enforcement the 381 p.7 Maintenance Code. Session, 7.28.15 National Healthy Housing Standard." Too many Tukwila residents occupying apartments with deplorable living conditions. Before any plans are adopted to add more apartments in Tukwila, the existing apartments should be brought to acceptable living Email from Brenda Goal 3.4 addresses improving Tukwila's housing 391 p.7 conditions. Schenck, dated 8.16.15 stock. Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Revise 2nd Implementation Implementation Strategy now reads "Explore Strategy on partnerships with partnerships with non - profits to facilitate the non - profits to allow for more CM Robertson, Council purchase and upgrade of poorly maintained 401 p.8 flexibility. Work Session, 7.28.15 rental- housing." Need additional policy language Staff Recommendation: Keep as is. Goal 3.5 and to support the development and Policy 3.5.1 addresses this by encouraging a preservation of housing to attract CM Robertson, Council variety of housing for people in all stages of life, 41 p.8 young families to Tukwila. Work Session, 7.28.15 including young families. Support Goal 3.5 as it opens the door to opportunities and provides framework for policies Keri Williams /Enterprise and tools to bring opportunities Community Partners, 421 p.8 land investment to the city. JCouncil Hearing, 8.10.15 lComment noted. 155 156 Strongly support emphasis on a diversity of housing choices. Strong support for housing Letter from Pam Carter, diversity shown at Community dated 8.10.15; Council 431 p.8 Conversations held in 2014. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Revise Implementation Strategy Implementation Strategy now reads "Encourage on first time homebuyer pFevide and help market private and public programs to allow for more CM Ekberg, Council assistance and education for first time 441 p.9 flexibility. Work Session, 7.28.15 homebuyers." Mobility is of great concern in the Information on student mobility is included in Tukwila School District. During the Housing Background Report. Goal 3.6: the 2014 school year, there was a Increase long -term residency in the City includes turnover of 49.72% of students. policy language to encourage long -term Mobility impacts student who residency. Mobility is a multifaceted issue that leave and who stay. Need for Mary Fertakis /Tukwila should be addressed in a variety of ways, housing for families to stay in School Board, Council including but not limited to housing. Comment 451 p.9 Tukwila. Hearing, 8.10.15 noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Revise Policy 3.6.2 so it reads Minor language change to be consistent with "Encourage long -term residency wording of Goal 3.5. Policy 3.6.2 now reads by providing a range of home "Encourage long -term residency by providing a ownership options suitable for Letter from Pam Carter, range of home ownership options for persons in 461 p.9 people in all stages of their lives." dated 8.10.15 all stages of life." Add a new Implementation Strategy, "Develop relationships with existing homeowner and neighborhood associations." The fifth bullet talks about helping to Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. develop associations, but there New Implementation Strategy to read "Develop are several current homeowners Letter from Pam Carter, relationships with existing homeowner and 471 p.9 lassociations in Tukwila. I dated 8.10.15 neighborhood associations." 156 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE: HOUSING ELEMENT DEFINTIONS AFFORDABLE HOUSING— Total housing expenditures in excess of 30 percent of household income are considered "excessive" and viewed as an indicator of a housing affordability problem. This definition of affordability was established under the United States National Housing Act of 1937. Housing that is considered affordable depends on household income and needs. There is no set price, size, or type of affordable housing. • A household earning less than 30% area median income (AM I) earns $19,990 or less per year, and can afford to spend about $500 on monthly housing costs. This includes full -time minimum wage workers. • A household earning between 30 -50 % AMI earns between $19,991- $33,100 per year, and can afford to spend about $670 on monthly housing costs. This includes childcare workers, file clerks, and home health aides. • A household earning 50 -80% AM earns between $33,101 - $52,939 per year, and can afford to spend $1,070 on monthly housing costs. This includes auto repair mechanics, social workers, and dental assistants. • A household earning between 80 -100% AM earns between $52,940 - $66,174 per year, and can afford to spend about $1,500 on monthly housing costs. This includes paralegals, nurses, and postal mail carriers. • A household earning the King County AM of $66,175 or more, can afford to spend about $1,800+ on monthly housing costs. Affordable housing can promote long -term residency for renters. According to the National Apartment Association 2013 report, the turnover rate for subsidized affordable units is about half of the rate for market rent units. Affordable housing extends to home owners and renters. A variety of affordable housing developers and financiers help moderate and low- income families to own a home. Recently completed rental and owner - occupied subsidized affordable housing 8/13/2015 W: \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \Housing Aff & Diversity Handout.docx 157 HOUSING DIVERSITY — Housing diversity refers to the range of housing options available to residents. • Diverse, affordable housing is critically important to the health and wellbeing of children and families. When housing needs are appropriately met, children are more likely to be healthy and perform well in school, and parents are more likely to be productive members of a strong workforce. • A diverse housing stock is linked to home ownership. Larger, detached single - family homes are often at prices out of reach for moderate - income families. Townhomes, duplexes, and tri -and four - plexes offer alternative home ownership options, often at lower prices than single - family homes. • Housing diversity is also related to housing accessibility. Housing accessibility is a very important consideration for the elderly as well as for other individuals with disabilities. • Housing diversity can be achieved through a multi - directional approach that includes both new development and rehabilitation. Examples of different types of housing PIETA 1ZC) ,CAI _i DUPLEX APARTr4ENT Nag am of iilssiri V' l d llee 1iciusiKr�g Iy'pes oir'lrcr ?:° j !, ,:, r, ti..i.;a °r, h ,. DIVERSITY — Broadly speaking, diversity is a range of different things. In regards to community diversity, diversity is often defined as individuals and systems responding respectfully and effectively to people of all cultures, languages, classes, races, ethnic backgrounds, disabilities, age, religions, genders, sexual orientation and other factors. 8/13/2015 W: \Long Range Projects \2014 CompPlanUpdate \CITY COUNCIL \TIB Housing NH July August 2015 \Housing Aff & Diversity Handout.docx 158 41 k IlEl7 � :.Ow, r 1 Ff Ei'r7 I Al III':: Q N A&RING I ON III °° °° „. m III11I III1 Ill III„ . „.10 Illy,,,,, 1011 Plum Street SE PO Box 42525 Olympia, Washington 98504 -2525 - (360) 5-4000 vp".connnercema.gov July 22, 2015 Ms. Rebecca Fox Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RE: Proposed amendment to the periodic update of the city's Housing Element and Residential Neighborhoods Element of the comprehensive plan as required by RCW 36.70A.130 Dear Ms. Fox: Thank you for sending Growth Management Services the proposed amendments to Tukwila's comprehensive plan that we received on June 17, 2015, and processed with Material ID No. 21351. We have reviewed your submittals and offer the comments below for your consideration. We especially like the following: • The Housing Element recognizes the need to address the lack of affordable housing for residents earning less than 30 percent AMI and not relying on market forces to provide this housing. • The Implementation Strategies under the Goals and Policies section, Goal 3.1 in the Housing Element considers flexible zoning standards to allow prevailing lot size to remain and smaller lot sizes to be allowed if desired. • The policies and strategies under Housing Goal 3.2 provide flexibility in the types of housing that might be developed as well as preserve existing housing. • The Implementation Strategy to explore increasing density in areas supported by transit or in proximity to high- employment areas is one of the principles of Smart Growth and will help prevent growth into natural areas or other areas of the city. • In the Residential Neighborhoods Element, the topic of code updates to address short -term vacation rentals and other economic uses in residential areas was listed as an Implementation Strategy and makes a lot of sense. MRSC has some good examples of how other jurisdictions are handling this issue. The website can be accessed at: http: //mrsc.org/ Home / Research - Tools / Ask -MRSC- Archives /Planning.asl2x #Request -for- information-on- other - cities - that - allow. 159 Ms. Rebecca Fox July 22, 2015 Page 2 • The link between Goal 7.3.2 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through land use strategies that promote a mix of housing, employment, and services at densities sufficient to promote transit and alternatives to auto travel and the Implementation Strategies that require capital improvements and investments, should promote the funding to implement this goal. • The strategy to revise development regulations to create an incentive rather than disincentive to share access roads is a nice addition. • Moving Goal 7.6: Southcenter Boulevard from the Transportation Corridors section of the Comprehensive Plan to the Residential Neighborhood Element is a good fit. We have concerns about the following that you should address before you adopt your plan amendments: • While the letter from your attorney from Kenyon Disend did a good job defending the 2031 Growth Targets included in the Housing Report which was the basis for the updated Housing Element, Growth Management Services recommends that Tukwila extrapolate the jurisdiction's growth rate from 2031 to 2035 which is the comprehensive plan horizon year, and show that there is still sufficient capacity. As noted in the attorney's letter, there are several methods for achieving this. County -wide (GMA and CPPs), only 3.2 percent additional capacity is needed. This additional information could be included as a new paragraph within the element, as a footnote, or a new paragraph in the background report. The intent is to show there is adequate space and capacity for the incremental increase in population. Congratulations to you and your staff for the good work these amendments represent. If you have any questions or concerns about our comments or any other growth management issues, please contact me at iovice.phi11i12S a�commerce.wa.�aov or 360.725.3045. We extend our continued support to the City of Tukwila in achieving the goals of growth management. Sincerely, Joyce Phillips, AICP Senior Planner Growth Management Services JP:Iw cc: Jeffrey Wilson, AICP, Senior Managing Director, Growth Management Services David Andersen, AICP, Eastern Region Manager, Growth Management Services Ike Nwankwo, Western Region Manager, Growth Management Services Lynn Kohn, Senior Planner, Growth Management Services 160 From: Nora Gierloff To: Laura Beniamin Subject: FW: public comment on comp plan FW: rezone lot size Date: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:17:02 AM From: Laurel Humphrey Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 11:12 AM To: Council Members; Nora Gierloff Subject: public comment on comp plan FW: rezone lot size From: ppinsic9090 [ rr7a.j.Itch.:..Kp.pinsicc)Oc)Ol )hotmail.cc:7rn] Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 10:09 PM To: CityCouncil Subject: rezone lot size hi im hyojin whitford who lives in 12217 46th ave s. tukwila. i strongly urge you to reduce lot size from 6500sgft to 6000sgft. beacause i want my property value back which was used be 4 lots. the city has been working on comprehensive plan including renew TIB, housing and neighborhood elements. now its the time to concern new lot size then upgrade the community value. thank you for reading my email & your time. best regards, hyojin whitford 161 From: Nora Gierloff To: Laura Beniamin Subject: FW: Input on Comprehensive Plan Date: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:53:49 AM For the matrix. From: Jenny McCoy [mailto:jenmccoy54 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2015 6:02 PM To: Nora Gierloff; CityCouncil Subject: Input on Comprehensive Plan I was unable to attend on Monday evening. I have two comments regarding housing: 1. We need to keep the current ratio of multifamily dwellings to single family dwellings to mitigate against a too transient population. Instead of building more apts, we need to upgrade the ones we already have to better meet our residents needs. 2. I believe that part of affordable housing includes permitting mother -in -law apts. My husband and I will be retiring within 10 years and being able to rent out our basement will make our own mortgage payment more affordable as we anticipate having a reduction in income at the time of retirement. Thank you for soliciting my input. Jenny McCoy 14202 56th Ave S Tukwila, WA 98168 162 From: Nora Gierloff To: Laura Benjamin; Rebecca Fox Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan: Comments Following August 10 Mtg. Date: Monday, August 17, 2015 9:47:12 AM For the Matrix From: Brenda Schenck [mailto :brenda.schenck @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2015 8:46 PM To: CityCouncil; Nora Gierloff Subject: Comprehensive Plan: Comments Following August 10 Mtg. I attended the Council meeting on August 10 hoping to have some questions answered about the Comprehensive Plan, specifically as it relates to housing development in the city. Going into the meeting, I had several concerns. I decided not to comment because I felt that I hadn't educated myself adequately to comment, and hoped that my concerns would be addressed during the meeting. The first concern was addressed by our high school principal, Pat Larson. We have entirely too many Tukwila residents occupying apartments with deplorable living conditions. Before any plans are adopted to add more apartments in Tukwila, the existing apartments should be brought to acceptable living conditions. There was discussion regarding intimidation of renters by managers when tenants bring problems to their attention, so I won't go into that here, but there is a lot of work to be done, especially with apartments on the west side of International Blvd. The second concern I have is related to how our current schools accommodate Tukwila's students, and whether that has been considered. I work at Tukwila Elementary, and we are at capacity, and it's my understanding that Cascade View is as well. Portables have already been brought in at Foster and Showalter. If the City plans to allow more apartment buildings, multi - family residences, or even single- family homes, we'll need somewhere to put the children that inevitably come with new housing. I went to Southgate Elementary school, and find it ironic that back in the day we had five elementary schools and not nearly the population. (I realize that the issue of schools does not rest solely with the City, but it's a very important factor when considering growth.) I have lived in Tukwila for 47 of my 50 years. My husband and I both attended Showalter and graduated from Foster. We chose to buy a home in Tukwila and raise our four children here because we love Tukwila. I wouldn't trade the experience of living here through the continued changes we've seen in our community, or raising our kids in this unique city. But it is heartbreaking when I think about the number of families who have moved away from Tukwila, people who are our friends, because of perceptions that Tukwila is rampant with crime, the schools are sub -par, and that we are in 'the hood.' My hope is that these words from the Comp Plan will remain at the forefront of decision - making when it comes to development in our city: 7.3.1 Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single - family and stable multi - family neighborhoods... 163 Respectfully, Brenda Schenck 5647 S 150th Pl. Tukwila, WA 98188 164 ATTACHMENT D Residential Neighborhoods Element - Planning Commission Recommended Version 6.26.15 Revision Matrix 8.19.15 Note: Comments listed without an exhibit reference were delivered verbally during the public hearing on 8.10.15. GENERAL COMMENTS Row # Page# Comment Exhibit # /Date /Source Staff co ent / analysis /ootibhs Seattle being a Sanctuary City by definition encourages the good, the bad and the ugly with respect to human behavior, contributes to Tukwila woes of transitory residents, crime, affordable housing, etc., because such transcends Seattle's city limits and spills over into Tukwila and other small cities. Hope Tukwila is being compensated Email from Bill Holstine, 11 NA accordingly, Seattle is. dated 8.18.15 Comment noted. My hope is that these words from the Comp Plan will remain at the forefront of decision - making when it comes to development in our city. 7.3[1].1 Maintain a comprehensive land use map that supports the preservation and enhancement of single - family and stable multi- Email from Brenda 21 NA family neighborhoods... Schenck, dated 8.16.15 Bold added by Ms. Schenck. Comment noted. Want to ensure that preservation Goals 7.3. and 7.4 include language to preserve of single - family neighborhoods is and enhance single - family neighborhoods. Single adequately addressed in policy CM Hougardy, Council family neighborhood preservation can also be 31 NA language. Discussion, 8.10.15 supported through zoning code revisions. This confirms my reading of an affirmatively worded plan for LDR neighborhoods and I will look for notice when codes will be Email from Sandra 41 NA evaluated in support of this plan. Kruize, dated 8.10.15 Comment noted. It is great to have neighborhood input, but the Council and the Planning Commission should be Letter from Pam Carter, 51 NA Ithe ones making the decisions. I dated 8.10.15 lComment noted. COMMENTS ON GOALS /POLICIES /IMPLEMENTATIoN STRATEGIES Row # Page # Comment Exhibit# /Date /Source Staff comment /analysis /aiptibhs Staff Recommendation: Include an informational sidebar to highlight what is meant by sustainability. Footnotes have not been used in other elements and should keep a consistent format. Informational sidebar to read "Sustainability is often defined as "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." This encompasses environmental, social, and economic factors such as air and water quality, access to living wage jobs, and a Add footnote with definition of social network among neighbors. A sustainable sustainability to provide more neighborhood provides housing, resources, and context on what is meant by CM Quinn, Council Work amenities that benefit residents and create a 61 p.1 "neighborhood sustainability." Session, 7.28.15 sense of community for generations to come." Refugee and immigrant resettlement in Tukwila is not new. It has been occurring for several decades and was addressed in the 1995 Pam Carter, Council 71 p.2 lComprehensive Plan I Hearing, 8.10.15 lComment noted. 165 166 I appreciate the historic preservation language included in the policies and implementation The format of the Comprehensive Plan strives to strategies in the Community focus on topics in one element, rather than Image and Identity element. I including a topic in multiple elements. This is would appreciate if there could acknowledged in the Purpose section which be some language in the Housing reads "This element focuses on land use and and Residential Neighborhoods development of residential neighborhoods. elements that cross - references Additional aspects of residential neighborhoods readers to the language that are found in other elements of the refers to historic preservation. Comprehensive Plan, including: Community Readers may not realize that Letter from Joan Image and Identity, Utilities, Transportation, and historic preservation is addressed Hernandez, dated Parks, Recreation, and Open Space." Staff 81 p.2 separately in a different element. 8.16.15 Recommendation: Keep as is. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Add new goal, to follow Goal 7.2, under Neighborhood Quality, and will tie into Policies and Implementation Strategies with 7.2. New Goal 7.3 to read "Stabilize residents and support opportunities for improved educational attainment, employment, engagement, Last sentence in Residential economic security, and personal safety." Neighborhoods and Land Use CM Ekberg, Council Numbering of subsequent goals will be revised, 91 p.3 should be included as a goal. Work Session, 7.28.15 i.e. existing Goal 7.3 is now 7.4, etc. Neighborhoods map should not Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. include "In which Tukwila CM Hougardy, Council New map will be included in final, formatted 10 p.4 neighborhood do you live ?" Work Session, 7.28.15 document. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Sentence to now read "In developing the Need to clarify what "these CM Ekberg, Council policies to meet there goals for this element, III p.5 goals" refers to. Work Session, 7.28.15 the following issues were identified for Tukwila:" Need to clarify "Neighborhood Quality." Description of the issue focuses on access and non- Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. motorized connectivity. Heading CM Ekberg, Council Heading to now read "Neighborhood Quay 121 p.5 should reflect this focus. Work Session, 7.28.15 Access" Heading "Noise Abatement" Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. should be changed to reflect CM Ekberg, Council Heading to now read "Wei.-Se b -ateY. eRt 13 p.6 narrative. Work Session, 7.28.15 Compatible Land Use" "Noise Abatement" title does not Letter from Pam Carter, 14 p.6 match the paragraph. dated 8.10.15 Addressed by revision in Row 9. Policy 7.2.2 addresses improving public infrastructure, with an emphasis on sidewalks, Tukwila's neighborhoods need to an equivalent level of quality in all more sidewalks. Sidewalks help neighborhoods. Implementation Strategies to create community and safety include exploring innovative financing options since people are outside talking Barbara Wu, Council for the construction of sidewalks. Comment 151 p.7 to each other. Hearing, 8.10.15 noted. The sidewalk needs to be extended on Macadam, between Implementation Strategies under Goal 7.2 the Baptist church and the include continuing to implement the City's Walk Winter Garden. Many children and Roll Plan, and Safe Routes to School, both of walk on this street and it is Barbara Wu, Council which prioritize pedestrian safety for children. 161 p.7 unsafe. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 7.2.4 to now read "Use -irlaRizatieR -;;Rd- The term "urbanization" is not new development to foster a sense of reflective of the type of community and replace lost vegetation and development that occurs in CM Robertson, Council open spaces with improvements of at least 171 p.8 ITukwila. lWork Session, 7.28.15 jeclual value to the community." 166 167 Policy 7.2.4., suggest change to "use new development to foster..." doesn't seem right. Suggest revising to "New development should foster a Letter from Pam Carter, 181 p.8 sense..." dated 8.10.15 Addressed by revision in Row 14. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 7.2.6 should include all Policy 7.2.6 to now read "Strict code aspects of neighborhood quality, CM Seal, Council Work enforcement of policies for neighborhood 191 p.8 not just focus on noise and odor. Session, 7.28.15 quality, ^W eial y FegaF iRg ^^is^ and Fifth bullet under Implementation Strategies should be clarified. Unclear if LID is required in specific areas, or an option in specific areas. Revise to read "Require sidewalks adjacent to all new development. Develop criteria to offer an alternative Policy language should be flexible to allow for option for participation in a no- Letter from Pam Carter, development of an effective residential LID 201 p.8 protest LID." dated 8.10.15 program. Staff Recommendation: Keep as is. The idea of a "good neighbor policy" is addressed through out the Comprehensive Plan as numerous elements strive to foster positive, healthy interactions among residents and among communities across the region. The Roles and Responsibilities element fosters positive interactions between the City and community members. The Community Image and Identity element fosters positive interactions internally and externally. The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) fosters healthy, positive interactions. It is also Add Policy 7.2.7 Establish a addressed in Residential Neighborhoods in community Good Neighbor regards to how the built environment can foster Policy. Sociability needs Email from Bill Holstine, social interaction and community cohesion. Staff 211 p.8 encouragement. dated 8.18.15 Recommendation: Keep as is. Add new Implementation Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Strategy to reflect current New Implementation Strategy under Goal 7.2 to Council action to develop and now read "Explore development and implement a foreclosure registry CM Quinn, Council Work implementation of a foreclosure registry 221 p.9 program. Session, 7.28.15 program." Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Need language to clarify that Implementation Strategy to now read "Develop signage should be developed in neighborhood signage in multiple languages to areas where it is most CM Ekberg, Council foster a sense of community in residential areas, 231 p.9 appropriate. Work Session, 7.28.15 where appropriate. This Implementation Strategy is consistent with Implementation Strategy, 14th the community vision to be "the city of bullet, discourages individuals opportunity, the community of choice" and is from learning English. Spend the also consistent with Goal 5: Positive Community money on teaching them English Email from Bill Holstine, Image and Identity in the Strategic Plan. 241 p.9 and encourage assimilation. dated 8.18.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested to fix typo. Implementation Strategy to now read "Apply the tree code to require site design that Second bullet, "maintain" should Letter from Pam Carter, minimizes the removal of significant trees and 251 p.9 be "maintains" dated 8.10.15 maintains appropriate tree canopy standards." Graydon Manning /Homestead Community Land Trust, 26 p.9 Support Goals 7.3 and 7.4 Council Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. 167 •: First Implementation Strategy Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. under Goal 7.3, after protect, add Additional language is in keeping with the intent "and preserve" to the sentence. of the policy to enhance and revitalize We should maintain our residential areas. Implementation Strategy now residential areas and avoid reads "Continued emphasis on existing land use commercial rezoning of such Email from Bill Holstine, patterns to protect and preserve residential 271 p.10 land. dated 8.18.15 uses." These strategies support the goal of neighborhood sustainability. An Implementation Strategy that Listing specific types of housing may not provide focuses on new single - family future flexibility to develop housing that meets homes is incomplete (8th bullet). community and market needs. A "variety of It should be revised to include housing" broadens the focus from single - family other types of housing as in " homes without being prescriptive. Staff Development of a variety of new Recommendation: Revise as suggested. housing including single - family Implementation Strategy under Goal 7.3 to now homes as well as townhomes, Letter from Pam Carter, read "Development of a variety of new housing, 281 p.10 etc." dated 8.10.15 including single - family homes. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Implementation Strategy to now read "Require Need language to clarify that sidewalk and landscape planter for both sides of landscape planters should be CM Ekberg, Council residential streets and where appFep at on 2- 291 p.11 required only where appropriate. Work Session, 7.28.15 lane street improvements, where appropriate. Need language to clarify that landscape planters in front of multi - family developments should be required only where appropriate. Many existing Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggest. planters are poorly maintained Implementation Strategy to now read "Require and do not add value to the CM Ekberg, Council sidewalk and landscape planters in front of all 301 p.11 streetscape. Work Session, 7.28.15 multi - family developments, where appropriate." Do not support requiring landscape planters on residential streets. Homeowners often neglect them. This is a major change in policy; it is not something the City has usually required. If the policy must be kept, suggest revising to say Letter from Pam Carter, Addressed by revisions in Rows 27 and 28. 311 p.11 "where appropriate." dated 8.10.15 Comment noted. Staff Recommendation: Keep as is. Way- finding Add "way- finding" to Policy 7.4.3 is addressed in Transportation Element Policy as a tool to encourage resident 13.6.9 which reads "Provide way- finding along identification with the CM Quinn, Council Work roads, sidewalks, and trails to direct non- 321 p.11 neighborhood. Session, 7.28.15 motorized travelers to trails and destinations." This is a policy carried over from the 1995 Comprehensive Plan. The intent of this policy is to promote residential development that does not take away from natural and historic features that have shaped Tukwila. Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 7.4.2 to now read "Ensure residential development, when applicable, reflects high Clarify what is meant by "valued design in harmony with identified, valued natural and historic features" in CM Hougardy, Council features of the natural environment and historic 331 p.11 Policy 7.4.2. Work Session, 7.28.15 development." Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Policy 7.4.6 -Add language to Policy 7.4.6 to now read "Support a residential provide more incentives and rehabilitation program that provides assistance, inducements for residents to inducements, and incentives for residents to upgrade and maintain homes and CP Kruller, Council Work upgrade and maintain safe, attractive homes 341 p.12 Iyards. ISession, 8.3.15 land yards." •: 169 Policy 7.4.7 -Add language to Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. include usage in addition to level Policy 7.4.7 to now read "Allow home of activity to help ensure that occupations as accessory uses if they have a home occupations are level of activity and usage compatible with compatible in residential CM Robertson, Council single - family structures and residential 351 p.12 neighborhoods. Work Session, 8.3.15 neighborhood goals." First bullet under Implementation Strategies - Term "historic development patterns" may be Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. misleading as it is unclear what is Implementation Strategy to now read "Revise meant by historic development. development regulations at the neighborhood Remove the work "development" CM Ekberg, Council level to reflect the historic develepmeRt- 361 p.12 to help clarify. Work Session, 8.3.15 patterns of the neighborhood..." As mentioned in the Preface to the Plan, implementation strategies are representative approaches to policy implementation aimed at achieving goals. The specific tools to mitigate Third bullet under the potential impacts of develop of smaller lots Implementation Strategies, will be reviewed, including public comment and requires more definition of how potential Council action, during a zoning code mitigation of potential impacts of Email from Bill Holstine, update process scheduled to begin in 2016. 371 p.12 smaller lots will be accomplished. dated 8.18.15 Comment noted. Third bullet under Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Implementation Strategies, revise Implementation Strategy to now read "Explore language to clarify that the devise code revisions to maintain standard Implementation Strategy is an CM Robertson, Council minimum lot size of 6,500 SF but allow smaller 381 p.12 option to be explored. Work Session, 8.3.15 lot areas subject to design standards..." Third bullet under Implementation Strategies, conflicts with Housing Element Policy 3.1.2. Support changing "Revise" to "Explore" in order to align it with the cited Housing Letter from Pam Carter, 391 p.12 policy dated 8.10.15 Addressed by revisions in Row 36. We need to address new homes Goal 7.4 and the Single - Family Residential being built in residential Development Policies address compatible infill neighborhoods. There should be at the policy level. Revisions to zoning code, a height restriction on new such as a maximum height in the LDR zone, will homes to be compatible with Maxine Anderson, follow after the Comp Plan update. Comment 401 p.12 existing homes. Council Hearing, 8.10.15 noted. Concern about giant homes. New development should fit into the Barbara Wu, Council 41 p.12 neighborhood. Hearing, 8.10.15 Comment noted. The idea of a "good neighbor policy" is addressed through out the Comprehensive Plan as numerous elements strive to foster positive, healthy interactions among residents and among communities across the region. The Roles and Responsibilities element fosters positive interactions between the City and community members. The Community Image and Identity element fosters positive interactions internally and externally. The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) fosters 7th bullet under Implementation healthy, positive interactions. It is also Strategies, agree but should be addressed in Residential Neighborhoods in part of a Good Neighbor Policy regards to how the built environment can foster sanctioned and promoted by the Email from Bill Holstine, social interaction and community cohesion. Staff 421 p.12 I city. dated 8.18.15 Recommendation: Keep as is. 169 170 The City's current tree work focuses on the 7.4.10 - Why do all plans improving the tree canopy, the number and promote tall trees? Absent tall types of trees in the city, and does not include a trees most of Tukwila residential tree height limit. Residents have the option to property would have views. With maintain and prune trees to maintain views. An a 35 foot high tree limit there Implementation Strategy under Goal 7.4 would be more view property addresses funding and technical assistance for with higher values and greater neighborhood tree planting and pruning. Trees tax revenue without provide numerous environmental services and compromising privacy. I like trees benefits to the community, including natural but do they need to be so high in Email from Bill Holstine, management of stormwater and providing 431 p.13 the city? dated 8.18.15 shade and cooling. Comment noted. 5th bullet under Implementation Staff Recommendation: Revise as suggested. Strateiges, revise language to Implementation Strategy to now read "Explore clarify that the Implementation devise code to allow home occupations in Strategy is an option to be CM Robertson, Council detached garages to support the development 441 p.13 explored. Work Session, 8.3.15 of detached garages." Detached garages are currently allowed in residential areas. However, current TMC does not allow home occupations in accessory 5th bullet under Implementation structures. Staff has heard from residents that Strategies- The Tukwila they would like to use detached garages for Tomorrow Plan allowed cottages home occupations to open the door to more to be constructed on existing economic opportunities. This Implementation residential dwelling lots and I Strategy is focused on exploring code revisions assume the existing to allow home occupations in detached garages. Comprehensive Plan also allows. The potential code revision could include criteria Surely there must be some to ensure that the level of activity and use of chicken coops and dog houses home occupations allowed in detached garages that could qualify too. Email from Bill Holstine, are compatible with residential neighborhoods, 451 p.13 dated 8.18.15 as stated in Policy 7.4.7. Comment noted. Parking standards are listed in the zoning code. In residential areas, the code regulates the number of off - street parking spaces and the Plan should require covered off parking surface. The City has never required street parking, at the very least parking spaces to covered. This can be explored off street parking which promote Email from Bill Holstine, during zoning code updates, at Council's 461 p.14 greater safety. dated 8.18.15 request. Comment noted. The intent of this policy is to utilize high - quality pedestrian and bicycle facilities (i.e. sidewalks, bike lanes, etc.) to link commercial areas to Policy 7.5.1, make this clearer by residential areas. The pedestrian and bicycle revising to say "...one- quarter facilities may not be solely located in mile of residential areas to those Letter from Pam Carter, neighborhoods. Staff Recommendation: Keep as 471 p.15 neighborhoods with..." dated 8.10.15 is. The intent of Policy 7.5.2 is to promote neighborhood- supportive commercials areas that are compatible with residential areas and can be easily accessed by foot and bicycle, such as a resident being able to walk to the corner 7.5.2 It's hard to imagine a store for a carton of milk. This policy does not successful enterprise without Email from Bill Holstine, exclude auto access from these potential 481 p.15 auto accommodations. dated 8.18.15 commercial developments. Comment noted. On- street parking along the street front, behind Implementation Strategies under or beside buildings can help to create a "Main Goal 7.5. On street parking, more Street" feel when done with careful design Shanty Town appearance and Email from Bill Holstine, requirements, such as the commercial center in 491 p.15 Isafety issues for pedestrians. I dated 8.18.15 lColumbia City. 170 171 Goal 7.6 - Southcenter Boulevard was moved from the original Transportation Corridors Element. The intent of this goal is to buffer residential neighborhoods to the north from the commercial activities and traffic of the Southcenter area. Since the 1995 Comprehensive Plan, Southcenter Boulevard was extended to the TIB LINK Light Rail Station. Language should be added to clarify that this goal focuses on the portion of Staff Recommendation: Revise Goal 7.6 to now Southcenter Boulevard that is to read "A corridor of low -rise offices, residences, the north of the Southcenter with localized commercial uses at major area, as the stretch of intersections all of which act as a buffer to the Southcenter Boulevard west of I- low- density residential neighborhoods to the 501 p.16 5 is residential on both sides. Staff edit north of the Southcenter area." Goal 7.6. These policies pertain to the area east of I -5,but do not pertain to the western portion of the street. The goal and policies should be rewritten to so that it Letter from Pam Carter, is clear this is only for the eastern dated 8.10.15; Council 511 p.16 portion of the road. Hearing, 8.10.15 Addressed by revisions in Row 50. Southcenter Boulevard is outside of the The second Implementation Southcenter Plan area, and thus the Southcenter Strategy should be deleted as Plan is not applicable. Staff Recommendation: Southcenter Boulevard lies Revise as suggested. Implementation Strategy outside the area covered by the Letter from Pam Carter, removed, "GeRtiR„„ ;Y..,pl„Y..,eRt -atieR Af the 521 p.16 Southcenter Plan. dated 8.10.15 SA ceRte F Add 7.7.3.1 Mandate Contractor Good Neighbor Policy by stamping all permits accordingly. To hold contractors Construction activities, as relate to noise, are accountable. Email from Bill Holstine, regulated by TMC 8.22. Staff Recommendation: 531 p.17 dated 8.18.15 Keep as is. The intent of this Implementation Strategy is to 5th bullet under Implementation lobby and work with the FAA to reduce noise Strategies, after 'impacts' add: impacts from airport operational procedures, including the coordination of which many include but not limited to helicopter /drone flight corridors Email from Bill Holstine, helicopters and drones. Staff Recommendation: 541 p.17 lover non residential areas. dated 8.18.15 Keep as is. 171 172 From: Nora Gierloff To: Laura Benjamin; Rebecca Fox Subject: FW: Residential Neighborhood Policies Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:15:24 AM Last comments for the matrix - - - -- Original Message---- - From: William Holstine [ mailto :holstine123ra)comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 10:08 AM To: Nora Gierloff Subject: Re: Residential Neighborhood Policies Nora A few comments on subject draft: General comment Page 3, second paragraph..... Obviously, Seattle being a Sanctuary City by definition encourages the good, the bad and the ugly with respect to human behavior, contributes to Tukwila woes of transitory residents, crime, affordable housing, etc., because such transcends Seattle's city limits and spills over into Tukwila and other small cities. Hope Tukwila is being compensated accordingly, Seattle is. Add 7.2.7 Establish a community Good Neighbor Policy (sociability needs encouragement) Implementation Strategies Bullet 5 Does the term 'no protest' mean generally acceptable to all? Bullet 14 Delete .... It discourages individuals from learning english, spend the money on teaching them english and encourage assimilation. Neighborhood Sustainability-- Implementation Strategy.... Bullet 1, after protect add 'and preserve' to sentence..... We should maintain our residential areas and avoid commercial rezoning of such land Bullet 13 ... Clarification of the term 'traffic calming' if more than speed bumps. Neighborhood Development .... Implementation Strategies... Bullet 3 Requires more definition of how mitigation of potential negative impacts of smaller lots will be accomplished. Bullet 4 Needs clarification of accessory units, standalone units and units in garages. Bullet 5 Does this mean or include Mobile Home Parks? What requires permanent foundations? Clarification needed. Bullet 6 What does 'site design' include? Trees, fences, etc.? Policy sanctioned and promoted by the city. Bullet 7 Agree but should be part of a Good Neighbor Bullet 12 The Tukwila Tomorrow Plan allowed cottages to be constructed on existing residential dwelling lots and I assume the existing Comprehensive Plan also allows. Surely there must be some chicken coops and dog houses that could qualify too. Move over Shanty Town, here comes Tukwila. It seems we are becoming more like the people we are trying to help faster than they are becoming like us. Pity! 7.4.10 Why do all plans promote tall trees? Absent tall trees most of Tukwila residential property would have views. With a 35 foot high tree limit there would be more view property with higher values and greater tax revenue 173 without compromising privacy. I like trees but do they need to be so high in the city? Page 14, Bullet 4 Plan should require covered off street parking, at the very least off street parking which promoter greater safety. Bullet 9 More or less dense? Page 15 7.5.2 It's hard to imagine a successful enterprise without auto accommodations. Implementation Strategies On street parking, more Shanty Town appearance and safety issues for pedestrians. Page 17 Add 7.7.3.1 Mandate Contractor Good Neighbor Policy by stamping all permits accordingly. To hold contractors accountable. Page 17 Bullet 5 After 'impacts' add: including the coordination of helicopter /drone flight corridors over non residential areas. Aren't you sorry you asked? Anyway I very much appreciate the heads up, Thank You ...... Bil 174 ATTACHMENT E 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update - General Comments Revision Matrix 8.19.15 Note: Comments listed without an exhibit reference were delivered verbally during the public hearing on 8.10.15. Row # Comment Exhibit # /Pate /Source Staff co ment /analysis /botioini s Lack of outreach regarding zoning Comment appears to fall outside scope of the 2015 code updates. Unaware of zoning Comprehensive Plan update. Development standards in code updates since purchased the LDR zone were last updated in 2001. When zoning property in Allentown, such as code is updated to be consistent with the updated 6,5000 sf minimum lot size in LDR Pat Malara, Council Comprehensive Plan, staff can explore more robust 1 Izones. Hearing, 8.10.15 outreach processes. Comment noted. In an effort to make the update material more user Outreach and information on the friendly, staff created one page "fact sheets" for each proposed updates to the element. In 2015, staff utilized a variety of outreach Comprehensive Plan were technique including emails, mailings, articles in the insufficient. Unable to access Tukwila Reporter and E- Hazelnut, posting materials on documents online and would like the City website, as well as holding a community open a summary /highlight sheet rather David Puki, Council house and attending all See You in the Park events. than reading very long Hearing, 8.10.15; Email Outreach efforts can always be improved and staff will 2 1clocuments. dated 7.13.15 consider this in future outreach efforts. Comment noted. Cannot attend evening meetings Council work sessions, public hearing, and deliberations on weekdays as they conflict with David Puki, Council have taken place as part of Committee of the Whole work. Would prefer meetings on Hearing, 8.10.15; Email meetings, which meet on Monday evenings. Comment 3 Isaturdays. dated 7.13.15 noted. Goals expressed in the Comp Plan are not specific requirements. Even if they are not achieved, as long as the City is working to meet the goals it has committed to What happens if GMA or other Email from CM i n its policies, adopted plans and development similar regional goals are not Hougardy, dated regulations, there wouldn't be specific consequences. met? 8.12.15 Note: The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) requires jurisdictions to submit draft Comp Plan updates by October 15, 2015 in order to be considered for grants in 4 2016. Would it be appropriate have another outreach to the community regarding the final In 2015, staff utilized a variety of outreach techniques version of the including: emails, mailings, articles in the Tukwila housing /TIB /neighborhood Email from CM Reporter and E- Hazelnut, posting materials on the City elements of the comprehensive Hougardy, dated website, and communications to the Community plan, due to its impact on our 8.12.15 Connectors. A community open house was held and residents? staff attended all "See You in the Park" neighborhood events to hear from the public and provide information. 51 1 IStaff feels that outreach to date is sufficient. 175 176 pnnn' 2ukiJ2avdd 3 To: Laura Beoiaoin Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Update Information Issues mamo' Monday, 3u|v1s' uozss:sx:zopw Thank you for your prompt response. | will get back toyou after | review the information and links that you have provided. Dave From: Laura Benjamin [maiKo: Laura. Banjamin@TukwilaVVA.gov] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:10 PM To: Pulki, David Cc: Laurel Humphrey; Rebecca Fox Subject: RE: Comprehensive Plan Update Information Issues Mr. Puki — Thank you for reaching out regarding the updates to the Comprehensive Plan. I have attached two documents, one giving an overview of the proposed changes to the Housing Element and the other giving an overview of the proposed changes to the Residential Neighborhoods Element. Also, you can access edited versions of the Housing and Residential Neighborhoods elements athtto://records.tukwi|avva.00v/VVebLink8/Brovvse.asox7startid~258587&dbid~1.The underlined text indicates new draft language and the text indicates language that may be removed. To address the changes you listed below, there are no proposed changes to limit the number and type of vehicles that may be parked on a residential property. Residential parking requirements are listed in Tukwila Municipal Code Title 9—Vehicles and Traffic, available at There is new draft policy language to explore adopting smaller lot sizes in neighborhoods where the historical lot pattern is smaller than the established 5,500 square foot minimum. However, the areas where the proposed smaller lot size may apply and the exact lot size have not been decided and if this policy moves forward, the new policy will require more outreach to residents and a Council decision to revise the City's Zoning Code. Currently, there are no public meetings scheduled for Saturday mornings. The upcoming meetings are part of City Council meetings which are held on Monday evenings, starting at 7 pm. We are in the process of finalizing meeting dates and will be sending out emai|s and postcard mailings next week. If you are unable to attend evening meetings, there is the opportunity to submit written comments and City Council meetings can be viewed on the [it/svvebsite and on TukTV. | am happy to meet with you during a time that is more convenient if you would like to further discuss the proposed updates tothe Comprehensive Plan. Please let me know what works best for you. Please feel free to contact me with any other questions or concerns. | can be reached at 205-433- 7166 and Best Laura Benjamin Assistant Planner, Department of Community Development From: "Puki, David J" <David.J.PukiPboeing com> Date: July 11, 2015 at 5:52:45 PM PDT To: "Planning ntukwilawa.gov" < Planning ntukwilawa.gov> Cc: "aIlan.ekberg ntukwilawa.gov" <aIlan.ekberg ntukwilawa.gov >, "DeSean.QuinnPTukwilaWa.gov" <DeSean.QuinnPtukwilawa.gov >, "Dennis. Robertson PTukwilaWa.gov" <Denn is. Robertson ntukwilawa.gov >, "Joe.DuffiePTukwilaWA.gov" <Joe.Duffie ntukwilawa.gov >, Verna Seal <Verna.SeaI ntukwiIawa.gov >, Kate Kruller <Kate.KruIler ntukwilawa.gov >, Kathy Hougardy <Kathy.Hougard)tPtukwilawa.gov> Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update Information Issues I have been looking through the website info trying to find out specifically what changes are proposed in the update and can't find any specific information on exactly what you are proposing to change or revise. Can you provide myself and other concerned residents with a list showing current conditions and requirements with the proposed revisions in a brief, clear and concise easy to read format? I was told you want to limit the amount of parking on existing residential homes to no more than 4 cars. You want to eliminate the ability for some home owner that owns a licensed commercial vehicle to be able to park at their home. And I was informed that you want to reduce low density residential lot sizes from 6500 sq. ft. down to 5500 sq. ft.. I was mailed cards this year that contain a website link that does not work when you type it in. There is no easy links to the planning dept or Planning Commission from the city's webpage either. I'm not available in the evenings to attend special meetings due to my work hours. And I don't need to spend hours upon hours reading hundreds of pages of vaguely written materials trying to figure out just what applies to me and what does not. What I have read is way too confusing to properly understand. So if you could be so kind as to please make available a short form of the exact existing vs. exact proposed conditions up for revision in this update year you will make me, my friends that are home owners here and my neighbors much more informed and likely to get involved in this process. We all don't like being surprised after the fact change is adopted. Are you planning to hold any public meeting on Saturday mornings? Thanks Dave Puki 3748 So. 152nd St. Tukwila, WA 98188 178 Upcoming Meetings & Events August /September 2015 24th (Monday) 25th (Tuesday) 26th (Wednesday) 27th (Thursday) 28th (Friday) 29th (Saturday) ➢ Community ➢ Utilities Cmte, ➢ Planning Tukwila Int'l. Affairs & 5:30 PM Commission, Blvd. Action Parks Cmte, (Foster Public Hearing Cmte's 5:30 PM Conference Board of Trash Pickup Day (Hazelnut Room) Architectural 9:00 — 10:00 AM Conference Review — on Room) construction of a five story, 92 -unit For location or ➢ City Council Holiday Inn information contact Committee of Express Hotel. Sharon Mann the Whole 6:30 PM 206- 200 -3616 Mtg., (Council 7:00 PM Chambers) (Council Chambers) C.O. W to be immediately followed by a Special Meeting. 31st (Monday) 1st (Tuesday) 2nd (Wednesday) 3rd (Thursday) 4th (Friday) 5th (Saturday) ➢ AAS ➢ Equity & Cemmissten, Diversity (Rescheduled to Commission, 9/8) 5:15 PM (Hazelnut Conference ➢ Library Room) Advisory Board, 7:00 PM (Community Center) ➢Arts Commission: 1st Tues., 5:00 PM, Tukwila Community Center. Contact Stephanie Gardner at 206 - 767 -2342. ➢ Civil Service Commission: 1st Mon., 5:00 PM, Hazelnut Conf. Room. Contact Kim Gilman at 206- 431 -2187. ➢ Community Affairs & Parks Committee: 2nd & 4th Mon., 5:30 PM, Hazelnut Conf (A) 4Culture Heritage Cultural Facilities Grant application for Duwamish Hill Preserve. ➢ COPCAB (Community Oriented Policing Citizens Adv. Board): 2nd Thurs., 6:30 PM, Duwamish Conference Room. Contact Chris Partman at 206 - 431 -2197 ➢ Equity & Diversity Commission: 1 st Thurs., 5:15 PM, Hazelnut Conf, Room. Contact Joyce Trantina at 206- 433 -1868. ➢ Finance & Safety Committee: 1st & 3rd Tues., 5:30 PM, Hazelnut Conf Room. ➢ Library Advisory Board: 1st Tues., 7:00 PM, Community Center. Contact Tracy Gallaway at 206 - 767 -2305. ➢ Park Commission: 3rd Wed., 5:30 PM, Community Center. Contact Dave Johnson at 206 - 767 -2308. ➢ Planning Commission/Board of Architectural Review: 4"' Thurs., 6:30 PM, Council Chambers at City Hall. Contact Wynetta Bivens at 206-431-3670 ➢ Transportation Committee: 1st & 3rd Mon., 5:15 PM, Foster Conf. Room ➢ Tukwila Historical Society: 3rd Thurs., 7:00 PM, Tukwila Heritage & Cultural Center, 14475 59"' Avenue S. Contact Louise Jones -Brown at 206 - 244 -4478. ➢Tukwila Int'1. Blvd. Action Cmte: 2nd Tues., 7:00 PM, Valley View Sewer District. Contact Chief Villa at 206- 433 -1815. ➢ Utilities Committee: 2nd & 4th Tues., 5:30 PM, Foster Conf. Room (A) "Green the Green" Grant Application Submittal (B) CBD Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation — Emergency Sewer Repair at 1227 Andover Park E. 179 Tentative Agenda Schedule August 13 September 18 (Tuesday) Special Presentation: - Swearing in of Police Sergeant Zack Anderson. -2015 2nd Quarter Financial Report. Unfinished Business -An ordinance authorizing and providing for the acquisition of interests in land for the purpose of completing the South 144f Street Phase II Project, providing for condemnation appropriation, taking of land and property rights necessary therefore, providing for payment thereof and directing the initiation of appropriate proceedings in the manner provided by law and for said condemnation. - Authorize the Mayor to sign Supplement Ni. 2 to Contract No. 14 -103 with KPG, Inc. for right -of -way acquisition services for the South 1441h Street Project. i m 10 17 24 See agenda packet cover sheet for this week's agenda (August 24 2015 Committee of the Whole Meeting). 14 21 28 Special Issues: Proclamations: Special Issues: -Teens for Tukwila - Mayor's Day of Concern Discussion and A Year in Review. for the Hungry. consensus on Sound - Review and update Cities Association of three of Tukwila's Public Issues Comprehensive Plan Unfinished Business Committee (SCA PIC). An ordinance updating Elements. two of Tukwila's Comprehensive Plan Elements.