HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAP 2016-05-23 Item 2C - Update - SeeClickFix "Tukwila Works" ToolTO:
FROM:
CC:
DATE:
SUBJECT
City of Tukwila
Allan Ekberg, Mayor
Community Affairs and Parks Committee
Rachel Bianchi, Communications and Government Relations Manager
Mayor Ekberg
May 18, 2016
Information Awareness - Follow Up on SeeClickFix — Tukwila Works
ISSUE
On March 28, staff presented to the committee regarding bringing online SeeClickFix, an app
and web -based tool that will augment the City's efforts to respond to issues raised by the
community. The Committee had some questions and concerns and asked staff to return with
additional information.
BACKGROUND
SeeClickFix is an app and web -based tool that allows residents and other stakeholders to
provide information directly and quickly to the government on specific issues. Staff have
adopted Tukwila Works as the City name for this effort; from now on SeeClickFiX will be
referred to as Tukwila Works.
In Tukwila, we have identified the following issues to roll out the effort with, keeping the list small
enough for staff to address but hitting on the key issues we know are of interest in our
community. These include:
• Animal Control
• Camping
• Code Enforcement
• Garbage /Debris
• Graffiti
• Illegal Parking
• Overgrown Brush/Trees
• Potholes
• Rental Property Concern
• Speeding or Traffic Complaints
• Stormwater /Sewer Issue
• Traffic Signal/Traffic Sign Issue
• Tukwila Parks Issue
• Other
Tukwila Works is intended to be conducted as a one -year pilot project to see whether this
technology is embraced and used by the community, and whether it is worth the investment of
$12,000 annually. The intention is to review the data collected over this next year and make a
determination as to whether to move forward with the technology beyond this initial pilot year.
Staff intends to brief the Community Affairs and Parks Committee with the results of this review.
Staff wishes to address the following specific concerns raised by Committee members at the
last meeting:
Prioritization of technology over other methods of issue reporting — The City has never
contemplated making everyone who wishes to report an issue use this technology. The usual
ways to report an issue — phone, email, in person, etc. will still remain a very important way for
residents to communicate with City staff; those usual ways were presented in April's Tukwila
Reporter. Tukwila Works is being approached as a way to augment these efforts, and provide a
centralized place for all issues reported to the City to be logged and accessed (with one
exception discussed below).
11
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 2
City staff who are notified of an issue via phone, email or in person, would then log the issue
into Tukwila Works, and work with the person reporting the issue to identify the manner in which
they would want to receive the follow up information. Residents who are not interested in using
the technology can continue to interact with City staff as they do now. Current methods on
response prioritization will not change. When projects must be prioritized over one another, the
method of reporting will not be taken into account. Rather, issues of safety, number of people
impacted, etc. will be the deciding factor.
Question on response times — The expectation is that every issue — regardless as to how it is
received by City staff — be acknowledged by staff within three business days. This is what we
strive for now following our City value of Responsiveness. This does not mean resolved, but
that the person reporting the issue knows that someone has been assigned the issue. Via
Tukwila Works, this would happen with an email. If someone is reporting an issue in another
format, their three -day acknowledgement would happen via that format of communication.
Concern about Code Enforcement — While Code Enforcement reports will come through Tukwila
Works, Code Enforcement staff will not enter all of their cases into this system. TracklT is and
will remain the primary system for tracking Code Enforcement cases. If a Code Enforcement
report comes through Tukwila Works that is deemed worthy of creating an official Code
Enforcement case, it will be entered into TracklT.
Via Tukwila Works, the person who reports a code enforcement issue and other viewers will
only see the following generic message:
Your request has been received and has been assigned to the Tukwila Code
Enforcement Division. You can check on the status of your issue via our mobile app or
on the City's Website at www.TukwilaWA.gov/TukwilaWorks. We will send you an
update when you request has been resolved.
Code Enforcement cases often take a significant amount of time to resolve due to legal
issues around property rights. There are many steps in the process that require specific
documentation, timelines and communications. Because of this, as well as privacy
concerns, if you would like an update on this case's status, please contact Code
Enforcement via phone at (206) 431 -3671. Tukwila Works will not be updated with the
various steps taken to resolve this issue, but once the case is closed you will be notified
directly with specific information on the resolution.
Thank you again for using Tukwila Works to help to make our community a better place
by notifying City staff of this issue.
Regards,
Tukwila Code Enforcement Division
P.S. Please consider signing up for the E- Hazelnut Newsletter, a monthly publication
delivered directly to your email inbox. To do so, visit www.TukwilaWa.gov and scroll
down.
When the actual case is closed, Code Enforcement staff will close the case in Tukwila Works
and include narrative in the notification that has to do with the disposition of the case. By doing
this we preserve privacy issues for our residents. Again, Code Enforcement cases that come to
the City via other communications channels — phone, email, in- person, etc. — will NOT be
entered into Tukwila Works.
WA2016 Info MemosTinal SCF Memo with AE edits incorporated rb.docx
12
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Page 3
Concerns about harassmentivigilantism — Tukwila Works has automated processes in place to
ensure that offensive content cannot be published. Specific algorithms don't allow certain words
to be included in posts, and terms of use are specific to what is appropriate and not to post.
Additionally, a poster can be "flagged" for inappropriate use, including for excessive reporting,
which then puts them into a moderated posting function whereby their posts cannot be seen
until SeeClickFix staff reviews and deems them publishable under the terms of use. If Tukwila
staff sees a questionable item, they can have the item "flagged" as well.
Concern about workload — Staff have spoken with other cities using this technology, as well as
SeeClickFix company representatives specifically on this issue. It is a common concern raised
by cities new to this technology. However, all have assured us that while there may be an initial
blip of work, the technology actually allows for greater staff efficiencies by having a centralized
location for all issues. Indeed, response from City staff has been very positive, with some of our
high - volume issue takers, such as the Public Works front counter, who see this as enhancing
their work with members of the community.
Concern regarding the TracklT Citizen's Response Module (CRM) — Committee members
raised concerns that the City had already invested in a similar technology that was supposed to
provide online reporting options that would integrate with other data in TracklT. The CRM was a
free module provided to Tukwila when the City purchased the other functions; no money was
spent. The CRM has no phone app or robust web interface for public use and thus did not meet
our goal of enhancing outreach to residents.
Concern that the technology may not be appropriate for smaller cities — SeeClickFix serves
hundreds of communities around the United States and in other countries, and includes every
size community. Below are some cities that use the technology that range in size, as well as
the two other cities in Washington that use SeeClickFix.
Yellowknife Canada — 19,000
Shoreline, WA — 55,000
Bainbridge Island, WA —23,000
Northfield NJ — 9,000 — 9,000
Stockbridge, GA — 25,000
Randolph, MA — 32,000
Clovis, NM — 39,000
Bexley — 13,000
Roll out plan — City Staff is internally testing the application to learn the system. Roll out the
technology is targeted for June 1, beginning with announcements on the website, social media,
special edition of the E- Hazelnut and flyers in various public locations, such as at community
events, as well as in June's Tukwila Reporter. We would expect City leaders and staff to utilize
the tool too, to be reporters as well. After providing usage information to the council, it is
anticipated that the fall edition of the Hazelnut would include an article on Tukwila Works and
the community's use and response.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff is seeking to answer the Committee's questions and receive input on the roll out of Tukwila
Works.
WA2016 Info MemosTinal SCF Memo with AE edits incorporated rb.docx
13