Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E02-002 - LAWTON JULIE / THE SENECA GROUP - AIRCRAFT HANGAR
E02 -002 WEST SIDE HANGER IMPROVEMENTS • Cizy of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2002 TO: Julie Lawton, the Seneca Group King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter serves as a notice of decision that the application for planned action regarding the construction of three new one story light aircraft hangars, the relocation of one existing single story light aircraft hangar and the demolition of a two -story office building and associated parking is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: E02 -002 APPLICANT: The Seneca Group for King County International Airport, the Boeing Company and the Museum of Flight REQUEST: Determine that the proposed construction, demolition and relocation fall under the Manufacturing/Industrial Center -Heavy (MTC/H) planned action criteria and therefore no. additional SEPA. review is required. Location: East Marginal Way South, between South 86th Place and South 87th Place (tax account numbers: 332404- 9019;.332404 -9011; 000160 -0049; 000740 - 0032;.282404- 9007) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction of three new one story light aircraft hangars and the relocation of one existing single story light aircraft hangar. Site surfaces adjacent to the hangars will be graded and paved to accommodate light aircraft maneuvering and parking. The project will provide for storage of 26 light aircraft inside the hangar buildings and 18 light aircraft outside parking/tie -down positions. Thirteen of the aircraft hangar positions replace hangar space being eliminated by the Museum of Flight Expansion Project. A separate project, but related action to this project involves the demolition of one existing two story brick and steel office building, approximately 10,000 square feet. The demolition of the two - story office building is part of this Planned Action SEPA. The applicant provided a traffic impact assessment, geotechnical study, hazardous materials survey and storm drainage system analysis for review as part of the Planned Action SEPA application. c:Unydocs\King County International Airport\Notice of Decision.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 • • DETERMINATION: The project falls under the planned action guidelines. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MIC/H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington, Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. the project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206 - 431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster, Director of (91/02- ity Development Date c:\mydocs\King County International AirportWotice of Decision.doc • city of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director February 15, 2002 MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster, Director +Iv/ Fm: Carol Lumb, Assotl�te Ptlanner Re: Project File No. E02 -002: King County International Airport: West side Hangar Improvements Project Description: Construction of three new one story light aircraft hangars and the relocation of one existing single story light aircraft hangar. Site surfaces adjacent to the hangars will be graded and paved to accommodate light aircraft maneuvering and parking. The project will provide for storage of 26 light aircraft inside the hangar buildings and 18 light aircraft outside parking/tie -down positions. Thirteen of the aircraft hangar: positions replace hangar space being eliminated by the Museum of Flight Expansion Project. The hangars range.in.size from 16,600 square feet to 22,450 square feet in size. A separate project, but related action to this project involves the demolition of one existing two story brick and steel office building, approximately 10,000 square feet. The demolition of the two-story office building is part of this Planned Action SEPA. The applicant provided a traffic impact assessment, geotechnical study, hazardous materials survey and storm drainage system analysis for review as part of the application. The project proposed under this Planned Action SEPA is a precursor to the planned expansion of the Museum of Flight. In order to expand on the north side of the Museum, one light aircraft hangar must be moved. The hangar is being moved to a parcel to the north of the Museum. In addition, 3 new hangars are being located on the same parcel. A two-story office building, with related parking will be demolished as part of the hangar relocation and construction. A transfer of properties among the Boeing Company, the Museum of Flight and the King County International Airport is taking place in order to facilitate the Museum's expansion. The site is within the project area for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The Integrated Plan and Final EIS were completed in March, 1998. Both the Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS and the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement analyze the environmental impacts of a range of development and redevelopment alternatives on the Boeing properties along the Duwamish River corridor. This proposed project falls within the parameters of the alternatives considered by the Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 SEPA Planned Action RevieE02 -002 West Side Hangar Improvements February 19, 2002 Proponent: • The Seneca Group, for King County International Airport, the Boeing Company and the Museum of Flight. Location: East Marginal Way South, between South 86th Place and South 87th Place (tax account numbers 332404 -9019; 332404 -9011; 000160 -0049; 000740 -0032; 282404 -9007) Agencies with Jurisdiction: King County Through an Interlocal Agreement, signed December 11, 2001 by the City (AG01 -132) and King County on December 13, 2001, the County has agreed to have the City of Tukwila serve as the SEPA agency and the permitting authority for any local permits required. Recommendation Determine that the proposed hangar, relocation and construction of 3 new hangars and the demolition of a two story office building and associated parking fall under the Manufacturing/Industrial Center — Heavy (NIIC/H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. 2 c:\nydocAKing Co. International Airport\dns- rptdoc • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director February 14, 2002 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Julie Lawton The Seneca Group 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2350 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: King County International Airport, file #E02 -002 Dear Ms. Lawton: Your application for a SEPA planned action for the west, side hangar . improvements located on the east side of East Marginal Way South from South 86th Place to South 87th Place'has' been found: to be complete on February 14, 2002 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The project has been assigned to Carol Lumb. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such - information is. necessary: to- ensure ae project meets the substantive requirements of the City Or. to .complete -the review: process: One item that :is needed. to complete the file is an original signed SEPA checklist — you may sign for Cynthia Stewart as the preparer of the checklist if you wish: =; Only the signature page .needs to:be returned:to This notice of complete application applies only to the permit identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits.. issued by other agencies. There may be permits from other agencies required which we have not identified. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely, Carol Lumb Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\mydocs\King Co. International Airport \complete- KCIA.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431'3665 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency Is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Cynthia Stewart, King County Intemational•Airport Manager Date Submitted: Exhibits: Location in Region A. Vicinity Map • • • B Legal Description • D S. 86th Place Intersection diagram E Geotechnical Report F Environmental Checklist 15 Carol Lumb I G COU1TYAIRPOR ^02 -002 Page 1 From: Mike Cusick To: Lumb, Carol Date: 2/13/02 10:08AM Subject: KING COUNTY AIRPORT E02 -002 CYNDY AND I HAVE REVIEWED THE SEPA CHECK LIST AND THE TRAFFIC REPORT AND HAVE NO COMMENTS ON THIS PHASE OF THE PROJECT. MPC CC: Knighton, Cyndy • • • Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter BI, #100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: 206 -431 -3670 Fax: 206 -431 -3665 City of Tukwila }32.- Out -y011 -01 Z -STrAl to Zg14O1 -100 ) To: Julie Lawton From: Carol Lumb 206 -431 -3661 Fax: 628 -7105 Date: 2 -14-02 Phone: Pages: 2 Re: King Co. International Airport ❑ Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Comments: Hi Julie: A couple of questions on the hangar project: 1) the new hangars will be located on parcels 000160-0049 and 000740-0032? 2) which parcel is the 2 story office building on that will be demolished? Is the demo of this building part of the SEPA? 3) there is a small parcel around which 000160-0049 is wrapped - is this also a part of the site where the new /relocated hangars will be placed? 4) for the parcel on the north side of the Museum of Flight from which one of the hangars will be relocated - does the SEPA cover any development or demolition activity on this site? 1 think that's it for now. 1'11 be in today and tomorrow until 1-1:30 p.m Thanks Preston I Gates' Ellis LLP January 31, 2002 Mr. Steve Lancaster Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 RECEIVE FEB 01 2002 Sgtevpn P Rowe sroa karo. Re: Museum of Flight Expansion Project - Property Transfer Agreement loss Dear Steve: Enclosed is a copy of the Property Transfer Agreement for your files. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, SPR:hbvv Enclosures cc: Bob Ormsby K:\21173 \88001 \SPR \SPR L2041 A LAW FIRM I A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES MO- 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5000 SEATTLE, WA 98104 -7078 TEL: (2061 623 -7580 FAX: (206) 623 -7022 www.prestongates.com Anchorage Coeur d'Alene Hong Kong Los Angeles Orange County Palo Alto Portland, San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC RECEIVED FEb 01 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, • KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, AND THE BOEING COMPANY Dated: October 31, 2001 Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10. Section 11. Section 12. Section 13. Section 14. Section 15. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Definitions 3 Intent and Relations 8 Conveyance and Improvement of the Building 14 -06 Property and the Lot 14 Property 10 Boundary Line Adjustment and Conveyance of Exchange Property Fee and Other Related Easements 14 Shared Use Parking and Common Areas 17 Conveyance of Site 3 Property 18 Costs and Expenses 21 Environmental Matters 22 Title insurance 25 County Approvals 26 Development and Public Benefit Commitments 26 Permitting 27 Representations and Warranties 27 Dispute Resolution 31 Miscellaneous Provisions 31 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT 9 EXHIBIT 10 EXHIBIT 11 EXHIBIT 12 EXHIBIT 13 EXHIBIT 14 EXHIBIT 15 EXHIBIT 16 EXHIBIT 17 EXHIBIT 18 Appendix A - Appendix B - Building 14 -06 Property Description Lot 13 and 14 Property Description MOF Core Facility Property Description T- Hangar Scope of Work Statement Site 3 Property Description T- Hangar A & B Parcel Description T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel Description Exchange Property Parcel Description Building 14 -06 Property Deed (Boeing to KCMOFA) Building 14 -06 Property Deed (KCMOFA to County) Exchange Property Deed Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement Site 3 Property Deed Second Amendment to Lease (KCMOFA and MOFF) Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area Easement Agreement Boeing Environmental Data Regarding Building 14 -06 Property Depiction of Aircraft Transit Corridor MOF Expansion Project Description and Depictions Public Benefit Commitments PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT THIS PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is dated as of October 31, 2001 and is by and between KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation (the "County "); KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority ( "KCMOFA "); MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "MOFF "); and THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ( "Boeing "). This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals A. The County created KCMOFA through Ordinance 7444 (December, 1985) as a public development authority under state law to assist with the development of a world class aviation museum called the Museum of Flight (the "MOF "). MOF is a unique and valuable aviation resource for the County and the greater Puget Sound area. MOF is one of the premier aviation museums in the United States, with a superior collection of planes, space artifacts, and archival documents. MOF was ranked as the region's number four tourist attraction in 1999 with 325,000 visitors. The MOF Core Facility (as defined below) is used as a first -class aviation museum and provides important public benefits, including education programs for over 100,000 participants, to County residents. B. MOFF operates the MOF. MOFF has identified a need to significantly expand MOF display, and storage facilities to house some of the more important planes in the MOF collection, including the first Boeing 747 and an early Air Force One, as well as to expand MOF archives and educational facilities. MOFF enjoys substantial support in the community at large and has raised significant funds for the MOF Expansion Project (as defined below). C. The County, through its department of the King County International Airport ( "KCIA "), currently owns the T- Hangar A & B Parcel, which land is located immediately north and adjacent to the MOF Core Facility, and on which is currently located T- Hangars A & B and 18 airplane tie - downs. The County leases space in T- Hangars A & B and leases the airplane tie - downs located on the T- Hangar A & B Parcel to private parties, which generates revenue for the County. The T- Hangar A & B Parcel was acquired using some FAA funds. D. The' County owns the Lot 14 Property, which is located north of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel. Boeing owns the Building 14 -06 Property, which comprises land and a building on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Lot 14 Property. Boeing has expressed a willingness to donate the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA in connection with the MOF Expansion Project. Neither the Lot 14 Property nor the Building 14 -06 Property were acquired using FAA funds. E. Boeing owns the Site 3 Property, which comprises land located across East Marginal Way from the MOF Core Facility. Boeing has expressed a willingness to donate the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA for the MOF Expansion Project. F. The Metropolitan King County Council has expressed support for working with the Parties to facilitate the MOF Expansion Project. G. The Parties desire to document the terms and conditions on which they have agreed with respect to the foregoing recitals as more particularly set forth in this Agreement. H. Appropriate approvals from the FAA are essential to implement the terms of this Agreement. I. This Agreement is not intended to serve as a "development agreement" within the meaning of RCW Chapter 36.70B. No development permits are approved by this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and promises contained herein, and the benefits to be realized by each party, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. All words in this Agreement bearing initial capitals, .other than proper nouns, section headings or words required to be capitalized for proper usage, are defined terms and have the meanings specifically assigned to them as stated below. "120 Day Contingency Period" means the period expiring 120 days from the date of this Agreement. "14 -06 Contingency Period" means the period expiring 30 days from the date of this Agreement. "1988 Loan" means the $2 million loan from King County to KCMOFA for the construction of the restaurant that is part of the MOF Core Facility, the balance of which is being repaid in installments by KCMOFA using restaurant revenues. "Agreement" means this Property Transfer Agreement and all exhibits and attachments hereto, as from time to time amended in accordance with the terms hereof. •"Aircraft Transit Corridor" means the approximately 200 foot wide strip comprised of the Tie -Down Area, the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area, the Exchange Property, and a portion of the Shared Parking Area, all as depicted on Exhibit 18. "Boeing Temporary License" means the temporary license on the Building 14 -06 Property granted by Boeing to MOFF for purposes, related to engineering efforts to support future demolition of Building 14 -06, of access, building inspection, site surveys, geotechinical surveys (exclusive of soil extraction), design engineering, and site preparation and permitting activities related to future demolition of the existing building on the Building 14 -06 Property and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs from the T- Hangar A & B Parcel to the Building 14- 06 Property. "Building 14 -06 Property" means the property currently owned by Boeing and described in Exhibit 1. "Council" means the Metropolitan King County Council. "County Construction License" means the temporary construction license provided by the County to MOl~'F for purposes of access, building inspection, asbestos /lead remediation, site surveys, geotechnical surveys, design engineering, site preparation and permitting activities, relocation of T- Hangars A & B and the airplane tie -downs from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs to the Lot 14 Property. "DOE" means the Washington Department of Ecology. "Environmental Expenses" means all liability, claims, damages,- costs and expenses incurred because of the Release of any Hazardous Materials into the environment, including, without limitation, costs of Remediation, penalties and fines, legal fees and expenses, consultant and expert witness fees and expenses, court costs, costs of environmental investigations, studies, testing and related analyses, natural resource damages, liabilities to third parties, and expenses associated with any dispute, including enforcement of rights of contribution or indemnification; provided however that such costs and expenses shall not be Environmental Expenses unless they are required by, or necessary to comply with, an Environmental Law. "Environmental Laws" means any applicable federal, state and local laws (whether under common law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, code or otherwise), permits, orders, decrees, and other requirements of governmental authorities relating to the protection of human health or the environment, whether existing as of the date hereof, previously enforced, or subsequently enacted. "Exchange Property" means that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel described and depicted in Exhibit 8 to be conveyed in fee from the County to KCMOFA. "FAA" means the Federal Aviation Administration. "FAA Approval" means necessary final approvals from the Federal Aviation Administration for the transactions, described in this Agreement to the extent required to convey the real property, including easement interests, provided for herein. "FIRPTA Certificate" means a Transferor's Certification of Non - Foreign Status duly executed by the conveyor of title to property hereunder. "Force Majeure Event" means a delay that is the result of any fire or other casualty, act. of God, earthquake, flood, epidemic, landslide, war, riot, civil commotion, general unavailability of certain materials, strike, lockout labor dispute or other occurrence beyond the control of any party. "Hazardous Materials" means any element, compound, chemical, chemical mixture, or other substance that is identified as, or determined to be, a hazardous, toxic or dangerous substance, pollutant, contaminant, waste or material under, or is otherwise regulated under, any Environmental Law or other law relating to chemical management, environmental contamination, environmental cleanup or nuisances, including, without limitation, petroleum and petroleum products, asbestos, radon and other radioactive materials, and lead -based paint. "Lot 13 Property" means the land owned by the County and described and depicted as Lot 13 in Exhibit 2. "Lot 14 Property" means the land owned by the County and described and depicted as Lot 14 in Exhibit 2. "MOF Core Facility" means the existing KCMOFA land and MOF structures located at 9409 East Marginal Way South in Seattle and described and depicted in Exhibit 3. "MOF Expansion Project" means the proposed addition to the existing MOF Core Facility, as described and depicted in Appendix A. "MOF Lease" means the lease dated April 30, 1986, a memorandum, of which was recorded in King County under AFN 8605270681, and a First Amendment to Lease, dated February 23, 1988, recorded under AFN 8808150442, all between KCMOFA as landlord and MOFF as tenant.. "Museum Purposes" means any use consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444 (the charter ordinance for KCMOFA). "Parties" means collectively (i) the County; (ii) KCMOFA; (iii) MOFF and (iv) Boeing.' "Public Benefit Commitments" means the commitments of KCMOFA and MOFF as set forth in Appendix B to this Agreement. "Release" means releasing, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, disposing, or dumping of a Hazardous Material or solid waste, as that term is defined in the Solid Waste Disposal Act. "Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs" means the demolition of T- Hangar A, the relocation of T- Hangar B from the T- Hangar A & B Parcel to the Lot 14 Property and/or the Building 14 -06 Property and the construction of a new T- Hangar A at the Lot 14 Property and/or the Building 14 -06 Property, as described in the scope of work listed in Exhibit 4. "Remedy" or "Remediation" means any action to identify, eliminate or minimize any threat or potential threat to human health or the environment posed by Hazardous Materials, including any investigation, removal, or clean-up or monitoring activities. "Shared Parking Area" means the parking area located on the west side of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel and the T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel. "Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement" means the easement provided by the County to MOFF and KCMOFA for purposes of using the Shared Parking Area for airplane and motor vehicle movement across the south 200 feet of the Shared Parking Area, parking (including bus parking) and below ground stormwater detention purposes, as further described in Exhibit 12. "Site 3 Property" means the property currently owned by Boeing and located across East Marginal Way from the MOF Core Facility and described and depicted in Exhibit 5. "T- Hangars A & B" means the existing two rows of hangars located on the T -Hangar A & B Parcel. "T- Hangars C -D -E" means the existing three rows of hangars located immediately north of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel. "T- Hangar A & B Parcel" means the property currently owned by the County described and depicted in Exhibit 6, which is located adjacent to the MOF Core Facility and upon which are currently located hangars A & B. "T- Hangar C -D -E Parcel" means the property currently owned by the County described and depicted in Exhibit 7, which is located adjacent to the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and upon which sit hangars C -D -E. "Tie -Down Area" means that portion of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel owned by the County and located immediately north of the Exchange Property. "Tie -Down Area Easement" means the easement provided by the County to KCMOFA for purposes of using the Tie -Down. Area for moving aircraft between the west taxi -way located to the east of the MOF Core Facility and the Site 3 Property, as further described in Exhibit 15. "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area" means that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel owned by the County and located immediately east of the Exchange Property and Tie -Down Area. "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Easement" means the easement provided by the County to MOFF and KCMOFA for purposes of using the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area for airplane, school bus and other vehicle parking, as further described in Exhibit 16. Section 2. Intent and Relations. A. Intent. Subject to certain feasibility contingencies provided herein, this Agreement reflects the agreement of the Parties to proceed with activities related and integral to the MOF Expansion Project. 1. Creation of Rights and Obligations. This Agreement gives rise to rights of, assigns responsibilities among, and creates obligations on the Parties as described herein. Each of the Parties will use good faith efforts to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, including the expenditure of resources in reliance upon the mutual undertakings it describes. 2. Assurance and Covenants. This Agreement is entered into by the Parties with the specific understanding and relying on the assurance and covenants of MOFF and KCMOFA to timely carry out the activities related and integral to the MOF Expansion Project. The Patties further agree that MOFF will operate the MOF consistent with the Public Benefit Commitments set forth in Appendix B to this Agreement. B. Overriding Legal Requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, nothing shall be deemed to preclude or excuse the Parties from complying with mandated requirements of federal, state or local law in MOF Expansion Project implementation. Mandated requirements shall include measures uniformly applicable to all similar projects or properties that, if not observed, would subject the Parties to penalties, sanctions, loss of funds or other restrictions, or findings of noncompliance. C. FAA Approvals. The Parties' obligations under this Agreement are conditioned on receipt of FAA Approval by December 31, 2003 except as follows: 1. Obligations with respect to due diligence materials as set forth in Sections 3.D and 6.E; 2. Obligations with respect to contingency period inspections as set forth in Sections 3.A, 4.0 and 6.A, including the indemnity obligations set forth therein; and 3. Boeing's obligations to convey the Site 3 Property. If KCMOFA accepts conveyance of the Site 3 Property from Boeing, then all of KCMOFA's and MOFF's obligations to Boeing with respect to such property as set forth in this Agreement shall thereafter not be subject to this condition. Nothing herein shall require KCMOFA or MOFF to conduct any demolition or construction activity or require such entities, the County or Boeing to make any conveyances . . described herein until FAA Approval is received. D. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of Washington. Any suit filed between Parties concerning this Agreement shall be commenced in the Superior Court for the State of Washington in King County. Section 3. Conveyance and Improvement of the Building 14-06.Property and the Lot 14 Property. A. 14 -06 Contingency Period. Prior to the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Boeing has delivered or made available to • KCMOFA and the County copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the Building 14 -06 Property, and, to the extent material to the prospective conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property and not privileged or confidential, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies; environmental reports and permits for the Building 14 -06 Property and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and the County and in Boeing's possession or under Boeing's control. Prior to execution of this Agreement, KCMOFA has had, and during the 14 -06 Contingency Period,. KCMOFA and the County shall have access to the Building 14 -06 Property and entitlement to enter upon such property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan development tasks; provided, however, that KCMOFA shall give Boeing reasonable notice prior to any soils extraction tests being performed by or for KCMOFA or the County. KCMOFA will carry liability insurance naming Boeing as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA and the County will each indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of each entity's own activities on the Building 14 -06 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 3.A. KCMOFA and the County shall not be required to indemnify Boeing for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Boeing during KCMOFA and County activities on the Building 14 -06 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 3.A. KCMOFA and the County agree to keep the Building 14 -06 Property free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's and the County's own inspection activities, and to repair any damage to such property caused as a result of KCMOFA's or the County's own inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. Before the end of the 14 -06 Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to Boeing and to the other Parties of whether or not KCMOFA elects to accept conveyance by Boeing of title to the Building 14 -06 Property based upon KCMOFA's and the County's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical environmental conditions, legal title, and zoning matters). B. Conveyance of Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 3.A above, that KCMOFA will accept conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property, Boeing agrees to convey, and KCMOFA agrees to accept, fee title to the Building 14 -06 Property, subject to Sections 7 and 8 hereof and to the following: 1. All representations and warranties of KCMOFA contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date made and as of the time of such conveyance with the same effect as if those representations and warranties were made at and as of the time of the conveyance. 2. KCMOFA shall not then be in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement to be performed by KCMOFA under this Agreement. The conveyance of title to the Building 14 -06 Property shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 9 hereto, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. The conveyance shall occur on a date mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA but not later than ninety (90) days after execution of this •Agreement or thirty (30) days following receipt of FAA Approval, whichever is later. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's gift of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. C. Conveyance of Building 14 -06 Property to County. If Boeing conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA pursuant to Section 3.B above, KCMOFA agrees to convey, and the County agrees to accept, fee title to the Building 14 -06 Property. The conveyance of title to the Building 14 -06 Property to the County shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit- 10 hereto, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. This conveyance shall be completed on a date mutually agreed by KCMOFA and the County, but not later than sixty (60) days following receipt of final certificate of occupancy of the new T -Hangar A and the relocated T -Hangar B; or thirty (30) days following KCMOFA's acquisition of the Building 14 -06 Property if such acquisition has not occurred when such certificate of occupancy is received. D. Delivery of Reports. If notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 3.A above, is to the effect that KCMOFA will not accept conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property, then KCMOFA shall deliver to Boeing a copy of each inspection, study, investigation, analysis, test, report, and the like, excluding financial analyses, obtained by or prepared for KCMOFA pursuant to this Section 3. In addition, in such event, KCMOFA shall return to Boeing all materials (including all copies thereof) provided or generated by Boeing with regard to the Building 14 -06 Property and delivered to KCMOFA or MOFF. E. Demolition and Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie- Downs. If Boeing conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA, then after- such conveyance but before KCMOFA conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to the County pursuant to Section 3.0 hereof, MOFF will cause the building located on the Building 14 -06 Property to be demolished and removed from such property. In addition, MOFF shall complete the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -Downs no later than nine months following issuance of the final building permit for the scope of work described in Exhibit 4. MOFF shall be responsible for securing the required permits and approvals for all work related to such demolition and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie- Downs. The County will cooperate to the extent the land owner's consent is required in obtaining such permits and approvals. MOFF will perform the work in a lien free manner. MOFF will carry liability insurance naming the County as an additional insured for such work. MOFF will indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of MOFF activities on the Building 14- 06 Property and the Lot 14 Property pursuant to this Section 3.E. MOFF shall not be required to indemnify the County for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the County. F. Boeing Construction License. Boeing hereby grants the Boeing Temporary License to MOFF for the purpose of preparing to do the work described in Section 3.E. The Boeing Temporary License shall expire on conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA. G. County Construction License. The County hereby grants the County Construction License to MOFF for the purpose of doing the work described in Section 3.E. H. Charitable Purposes. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's . gift of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. Boeing and KCMOFA intend, and KCMOFA represents and warrants, that KCMOFA's use of the Building 14 -06 Property shall be only as planned in connection with the MOF Expansion Project (as described on Appendix A); in the alternative, for Museum Purposes; or, in the altemative, as "aeronautical property" as that term is defined by the FAA in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook. Section 4. Boundary Line Adjustment and Conveyance of Exchange Property Fee and Other Related Easements. A. Boundary Line Adjustment. After the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs, the County agrees to obtain a boundary line adjustment to legally segregate the Exchange Property from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and, to the extent that the T -Hangar A & B Parcel is a part of the T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel, from the T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel. The County agrees to initiate the boundary line adjustment and KCMOFA will cooperate in this process and be responsible for any related third party costs. B. Conveyance of Exchange Property. Following the boundary line adjustment and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs, and subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 4.C. and D. below, the County agrees to convey, and KCMOFA agrees to accept, fee title to the Exchange Property. The conveyance of title to the Exchange Property shall be accomplished by a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 11 and shall occur no later than sixty (60) days following receipt of final certificate of occupancy of relocated T- Hangars A & B; or thirty (30) days following KCMOFA's acquisition of the Building 14 -06 Property if such acquisition has not occurred when such certificate of occupancy is received. The deed conveying the Exchange Property to KCMOFA shall restrict the use of the Exchange Property to Museum Purposes only. Upon this conveyance (and the conveyance of the Site 3 Property described in Section 6 below), the MOFA Lease shall be amended to include the Exchange Property within the leased premises pursuant to an amendment in the form attached as Exhibit 14. C. Acceptance of Exchange Property. KCMOFA's obligation to accept conveyance of the Exchange Property shall be conditioned upon KCMOFA's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical and environmental conditions, legal, title, and zoning matters) before expiration of the 120 Day Contingency Period. Within twenty (20) days after the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the County shall deliver or make available to KCMOFA copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the T -Hangar A & B Parcel, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies, environmental reports and permits for the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and in the County's possession or under the County's control. During the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall have access to the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and shall be entitled to enter upon the property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan development tasks. KCMOFA will purchase liability insurance naming the County as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA will indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of KCMOFA activities on the T- Hangar A & B Parcel pursuant to this Section 4.D. KCMOFA shall not be required to indemnify the County for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the County. KCMOFA agrees to keep the T- Hangar A & B Parcel free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's inspection activities and to repair any damage to such property caused by KCMOFA's inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. At the end or before the end of the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to the County of whether or not KCMOFA elects to proceed with the conveyance of the Exchange Property. D. Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA that KCMOFA has agreed to accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property in accordance with Section 6.B below, the County agrees to provide an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit 15 (the "Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for use of the Tie -Down Area, including for vehicle access and aircraft movement. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Tie -Down Area. 2. Right to Temporarily Move and Relocate Airplanes. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to temporarily move and relocate the airplanes located at the tie -downs on the Tie -Down Area to facilitate movement of larger aircraft in connection with operation of the MOF; provided that, MOFF shall provide at least fourteen (14) days notice to the County of such activity, and MOFF will secure, alternative tie -down or parking space as needed for such displaced aircraft. 3. Hangar Tenant Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall develop procedures, to be approved by KCIA, to ensure that their use of the Tie -Down Area does not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the tenants of the tie -downs located on the Tie -Down Area. 4. Aircraft Transit Corridor. KCMOFA and MOFF. shall have the right. to .. use the Tie -Down Area as a part of the Aircraft Transit Corridor. E. Transient Aircraft, and Vehicle Parking Area Easement. The County agrees to provide an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit 16 (the "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for airplane and vehicle parking in the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area. 2. Right to Reconfigure. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to restripe and reconfigure the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area to be suitable for MOF parking needs. 3. Right to Control. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to control the parking at the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area, which shall include parking for airplanes, buses, cars, and other vehicles in connection with the operation of the MOF. 4. Aircraft Transit Corridor. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to use the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area as a part of the Aircraft Transit Corridor. Section 5. Shared Use Parking and Common Areas. A. Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement. The County agrees to provide an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit 12 (the "Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for MOF parking rights (including bus parking) to the Shared Parking Area. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Shared Use Parking Area. 2. Right to Reconfigure. KCMOFA and MOFF- shall have the right to restripe and reconfigure the Shared Parking Area to be suitable for MOF parking needs. 3. Hangar Tenant Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall develop procedures to ensure that their use of the Shared Parking Area does not prevent the tenants of T- Hangars C -D -E from having continued access to parking on the Shared Parking Area. 4. Stormwater Detention. The County and KCMOFA agree that KCMOFA's and MOFF's use of the Shared Parking Area shall. include, ;f necessary, a stormwater detention system so long as the same does not materially interfere with or impede the availability of parking or the Shared Use Area for County and MOF activities. B. 747 Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to park the MOF 747 airplane on the Lo{ 13 Property and Lot 14 Property, until such time as it can be moved to the. Site 3 Property. Such parking shall not interfere with the Relocation of T- Hangars & Tie- Downs. Section 6. Conveyance of Site 3 Property. A. Acceptance of Site 3 Property. Boeing has made or will make available to KCMOFA copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the Site 3 Property, and, to the extent material to the prospective conveyance of the Site 3 Property in light of the MOF Expansion Project and not privileged or confidential, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies, environmental reports and permits for the Site 3 Property and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and in Boeing's possession or under Boeing's control. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, KCMOFA has had, and during the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall have access to the Site 3 Property and entitlement to enter upon such property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan development tasks, provided, however, that KCMOFA shall give Boeing reasonable notice prior to any soils extraction tests being performed by or for KCMOFA. KCMOFA will purchase liability insurance naming Boeing as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA will indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of KCMOFA activities on the Site 3 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 6.A. KCMOFA shall not be required to indemnify Boeing for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Boeing during the KCMOFA activities on the Site 3 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 6.A. KCMOFA agrees to keep the Site 3 Property free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's inspection activities, and to repair any damage to such property caused as a result of KCMOFA's inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. Before the end of the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to Boeing of whether or not KCMOFA elects to accept the conveyance by Boeing of title to the Site 3 Property, based upon KCMOFA's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical and environmental conditions, legal title, and zoning matters). B. No Further Action Determination. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 6.A above, that KCMOFA shall accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property, Boeing agrees to use its best reasonable efforts to (i), take actions required of it to obtain and (ii) obtain, or, assist KCMOFA or MOFF to obtain a no further action determination from DOE with respect to the Site 3 Property. C. Conveyance of Site 3 Property. Boeing agrees to convey, and KCMOFA agrees to accept, fee title to the Site 3 Property, subject to Sections 7 and 8 hereof and to the following: 1. All representations and warranties of KCMOFA contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date made and as of the time of the conveyance with the same effect as if those representations and warranties were made at and as of the time of . such conveyance. 2. KCMOFA shall not be in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement to be performed by KCMOFA under this Agreement. 3. The conveyance of title to the Site 3 Property shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 13, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. The transfer and conveyance shall be completed on a date mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA, but no later than April 30, 2002. If conveyance of the Site 3 Property occurs before issuance of the no further action determination described in Section 6.B above, KCMOFA shall provide Boeing with access to the Site 3 Property for Boeing to conduct activities appropriate to its assistance in KCMOFA's or MOFF's securing the no further action determination. Such access will be pursuant to a plan mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA and amended as appropriate from time to time designed to minimize interference with KCMOFA's development activities for the Site 3 Property. Upon this conveyance (and the conveyance of the Exchange Property described in Section 4 above), KCMOFA or MOFF or both shall cause the MOF Lease to be amended to include the Site 3 Property within the leased premises pursuant to the amendment in the form attached as Exhibit 14. D. Charitable Purposes. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's gift of the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. Boeing and KCMOFA intend, and KCMOFA warrants, that KCMOFA's use of the Site 3 Property shall be only for the MOF Expansion Project; or, in the alternative, for Museum Purposes. E. Delivery of Reports. If notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section.6.A above, is to the effect that KCMOFA will not accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property, then KCMOFA shall deliver to Boeing a copy of each inspection, study, investigation, analysis, test, report, and the like, excluding financial analyses, obtained or prepared for . KCMOFA pursuant to this Section 6. In such event, KCMOFA shall return to Boeing -all materials provided and self - generated with regard to the Site 3 Property. Section 7. Costs and Expenses. A. Boeing Costs Related to Conveyance. If the conveyance contemplated in Section 3.B or in Section .6 is consummated, then Boeing shall bear the following costs and expenses with respect to any such conveyance: 1. excise taxes and fees payable on the transfer of title to real property, 2. the cost of recording the relevant deed; and 3. Boeing's share of prorations, as described in Section 7.D below. B. KCMOFA Costs Related to Conveyance. If the conveyance contemplated in Section 3.B or in Section 6 is consummated, then KCMOFA shall bear the following costs and expenses with respect to any such conveyance: 1. all premiums for the KCMOFA's title policy, if any, and 2. KCMOFA's share of prorations, as described in Section 7.D below. C. Prorated Costs. If conveyances in Sections 3.0 or 4.B are consummated, KCMOFA and the County will each pay their respective share of prorations as provided in Section 7.D below and the premium for any title policy obtained by such party. There should be no excise tax on such transfers and KCMOFA and the County will share the recording fees. Tax and Utility Expenses. All taxes and utility expenses relating to the property being, conveyed pursuant to Section 3 or Section 6, including without limitation, real property taxes and assessments, shall be prorated on an accrual basis as of the date of the pertinent conveyance. If the grantor and grantee of each such conveyances are unable to obtain final meter readings from all applicable meters as of the time of conveyance, such expenses shall be reasonably estimated as of such time on the basis of the prior operating history of the respective property. Section 8. Environmental Matters. A. KCMOFA Acknowledgement. KCMOFA hereby acknowledges that Boeing has disclosed the existence of asbestos at the Building 14 -06 Property, at locations including, but not limited to, the roofing material, soffits, joint materials and ventilation system. B. Site 3 Property Remediation. The Site 3 Property is part of a larger site -wide voluntary remediation agreement between Boeing and DOE. The Site 3 Property is currently subject to an ongoing environmental action plan intended to result in a no further action determination by DOE. 1. Completion of Remediation Activities. Conditioned on receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 6.A above, that KCMOFA shall accept conveyance of title to the Site 3 Property, Boeing agrees to (a) use its best reasonable efforts to take actions to obtain, and (b) to obtain or, after Boeing transfers title to the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA, to manage the efforts to obtain, a no further action determination from DOE with respect to the Site 3 Property, provided, however, that after such title transfer, KCMOFA shall use good faith efforts to assist in obtaining such determination if it has not already been obtained. 2. Contaminated Materials. Boeing further agrees that if (a) physical or field screening evidence of soil contamination or groundwater contamination that constitutes Hazardous Materials is encountered at the Site 3 Property during excavation for or construction of the MOF Expansion Project; and (b) Boeing is notified of any such contamination; and (c) the contamination was, as determined in accordance with the Dispute Resolution process specified in Section 14 below, caused by Boeing or its agents (and KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the burden of proof with regard to causation on this issue pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 14), then, Boeing will, at its expense, characterize, process, and dispose of such Hazardous Material in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. C. Environmental Indemnities. 1. Boeing Indemnification Regarding Building 14 -06 Property. Except with respect to matters referred to in Section 8.A, Boeing shall defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA, MOFF and King County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property known to Boeing and as described in the environmental data listed on Exhibit 17 and existing as of the date Boeing transfers such property to KCMOFA; provided that Boeing's obligations pursuant to this Section 8.C.1. shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Building 14 -06 Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA.. 2. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification of Boeing and the County Regarding Building 14-06 Property. Each of KCMOFA and MOFF agree to defend, indemnify and hold Boeing and the County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to (a) the removal of asbestos or asbestos - containing materials currently located in the Building 14 -06. Property or (b) KCMOFA's demolition of the building currently located on the Building 14-06 Property or both. KCMOFA and MOFF assume liability for and indemnify Boeing from all responsibility for the activities described in the preceding (a) and (b), including but not limited to all responsibility for any notifications required by law to employees, contractors, assignees or transferees, and all responsibility for abatement and disposal of materials removed under (a) and (b) in compliance with applicable law, whether at or prior to alteration or demolition. 3. County Indemnification of Boeing and KCMOFA Regarding the Building 14 -06 Property. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Boeing, KCMOFA and MOFF harmless fiom and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property that first become present on the property after the date of transfer of such property to the County; provided that, the County's obligations pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that originate from activities or releases occurring, or the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property arising, before the transfer of the Building 14 =06 Property to the County. 4. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification of County Regarding Exchange Property. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to defend, indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Exchange Property that first become present on the property after the date of transfer of such property to the KCMOFA; provided that, KCMOFA and MOFF's obligations pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that originate from activities or releases occurring, or the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Exchange Property arising, before the transfer of the Exchange Property to KCMOFA. 5. County Indemnification of KCMOFA and MOFF Regarding Exchange Property. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA and MOFF harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on The Exchange Property existing as of the date of transfer of such property to KCMOFA; provided that the County's obligation pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Exchange Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA. 6. Boeing Indemnification Regarding Site 3 Property. Boeing agrees to defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA and MOFF harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials Lhat (a) are on the Site 3 Property existing as of the date of the transfer of such property to KCMOFA and (b) were caused by Boeing or its agents (and KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the burden of proof with regard to causation on this issue pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 14); provided that Boeing's obligation pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Site 3 Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA. 7. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification Regarding Site 3 Property. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to defend, indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials other than those to which Boeing's indemnification obligation extends pursuant to Section 8.C.6. Section 9. Title Insurance. KCMOFA and the County, at their discretion, may purchase owner's title insurance in form and substance satisfactory to the prospective owner for the property transfers that are provided for in this Agreement. Section 10. County Approvals. A. County Approval of Reconfiguration. Pursuant to the terms of the 1988 Loan, the County hereby approves the reconfiguration of the kitchen, cafe and meeting room as it relates to and is part of the MOF Expansion Project. B. County Approvals of 1988 Loan Terms. KCMOFA and MOFF will seek County approvals, as required under the terms of the 1988 Loan, of any financing guarantee by MOFF and of any use of loan proceeds toward the MOF Expansion Project. Section 11. Development and Public Benefit Commitments. A. MCSF Expansion Project Development. MOFF agrees to design and construct the MOF Expansion Project as described and depicted in Appendix A to this Agreement. In addition: 1. Design and Construction Authority. MOFF shall have full design and construction authority over the MOF Expansion Project. 2. First -Class Aviation and Space Museum. MOFF commits to design and construct the MOF Expansion Project to be a first -class aviation and space museum, consistent with MOF program requirements. 3. Permits and Approvals. MOFF shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits or approvals for the design and construction of the MOF Expansion Project. 4. Financial Commitments. MOFF and KCMOFA agree to diligently pursue appropriate financial commitments for the MOF Expansion Project. B. • Time of Completion of MOF Expansion Project. In recognition-of the significant public benefits that will follow from completion of the MOF Expansion Project, MOFF shall use its best efforts to commence design and construction of the MOF Expansion Project within seven years following the execution of this Agreement, excluding time periods when the design, construction or development of such project is unavoidably delayed by a Force Majeure Event. C. Public Benefit Commitments. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to provide the Public Benefit Commitments. Section 12. Permitting. The Parties agree that the City of Tukwila is in the best position to (a) efficiently review and provide the land use approvals and construction permits associated with the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs and the MOF Expansion Project (including the boundary line adjustment between the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and the .County's adjacent land); and (b) coordinate with KCIA and the FAA for such project to assuri_ that any permitted facilities are satisfactory to KCIA and the FAA. The Parties hereby consent to the City of Tukwila acting as the lead agency in implementing such a land use permitting arrangement. Subject to the City of Tukwila's concurrence, the County agrees to delegate its land use permitting authority for the limited purposes of the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - downs. Any development involving the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs shall meet or exceed County standards regarding protection of the public with respect to environmental, health and safety requirements. Section 13. Representations and Warranties. The Parties represent and warrant as follows: A. County Representations and Warranties. The County represents and warrants to the following: 1. Valid Existence. King County is a home rule charter county duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washington►. 2. Valid Execution. The . execution and delivery of this Agreement by the County has been duly and validly authorized by ordinance. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the County, enforceable against the County in accordance with its terms. B. Boeing Representations and Warranties. Boeing represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. Boeing is a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Boeing has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of Boeing, enforceable against Boeing in accordance with its terms. C. KCMOFA Representations and Warranties. In consideration of Boeing's entering into this Agreement and as an inducement to Boeing to donate the Building 14 -06 Property and the Site 3 Property, KCMOFA makes the following representations and warranties, each of J which is material and is being relied upon by Boeing, and the truth and accuracy of which shall constitute a condition precedent to Boeing's obligations hereunder. KCMOFA represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. KCMOFA is a Washington public development authority duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washington and is a public development authority authorized under RCW § 35.21.730 -.745. 2. . Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by KCMOFA has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of KCMOFA, enforceable against KCMOFA in accordance with its terms. 3. No Conflict. Neither the incurrence of the obligations set forth herein, nor the consummation of the transaction contemplated herein with respect to KCMOFA, nor compliance with the terms of this Agreement and of the documents and instruments described herein conflicts with or results in the material breach of any terms, conditions, or provisions of, or constitutes a default under, any bond, note, indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, loan, lease or other financing agreement to which KCMOFA is a party. 4. Use of Property. KCMOFA will use the Site 3 Property and the Building 14 -06 Property as currently contemplated in connection with the MOF Expansion Project; provided however; that if KCMOFA does not proceed with the MOF Expansion Project as contemplated hereby, the Building 14 -06 Property will be used for Museum Purposes, or in the alternative as "aeronautical property" as defined by the FAA in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook, and the Site 3 Property will be used for Museum Purposes. D. MOFF Representations and Warranties. MOFF represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. MOFF is a nonprofit corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washington. MOFF has received a preliminary determination that it is a tax- exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by MOFF has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of MOFF, enforceable against MOFF in accordance with its terms. E. As Is Transfers. All transfers pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the following provisions: 1. All transfers hereunder shall be made without warranties, representations; or guarantees by the transferor of any kind or nature, express or implied, except for the applicable warranties set out in Section 13 and the warranties of title set forth in the applicable deed. 2. Except as set forth in the . respective indemnification provisions, a transferred property shall be received and accepted by the transferee "AS IS ", "WHERE - IS ", "WITH ALL FAULTS" including, without limitation, all physical and environmental matters and conditions, and all other material facts and issues, now or hereafter existing or arising, known or unknown. 3. Any reports, studies, analyses, maps, drawings, materials and other documents provided by one Party to another are only provided as an accommodation with no representation or warranty by the providing Party as to their completeness, reliability, sufficiency, or accuracy and not with the intent that any such documents be relied upon by any Party, except to the extent that such Party has independently confirmed the validity, reliability, and sufficiency of any such documents and the information contained in them. 4. A transferee's decision to receive and accept the a property hereunder is based solely on the investigation, study, and analyses of all aspects of such properties as made by the transferee and its agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, advisors, and independent contractors. 5. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, it is expressly understood and agreed by the Parties that all statements and representations concerning a property made by a Party or its agents and independent contractors (a) were and are intended and understood by all Parties to be made only as a convenience and not in lieu of a Party's investigation and (b) were and are not to be relied or acted on by any party. Section 14. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a contractual dispute between or among any of the Parties regarding this Agreement, the affected parties shall attempt to resolve the matter informally. If the affected parties are unable to resolve the matter informally, the matter shall be forwarded for discussions by the County Executive, the General Counsel for Boeing, and the MOFF Board Chairperson or their respective designee(s). If this process fails to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days after such referral, an affected Party may submit the matter to a nonbinding, structured mediation procedure fashioned by persons or organizations experienced in alternative dispute resolution ( "ADR ") procedures. The mediation may be requested by any party and shall be initiated within thirty (30) days from the date of the request unless extended by agreement of the affected parties. The alternative dispute resolution procedures utilized for the mediation shall include the exchange of written claims and responses, with supporting information, at least seven (7) days prior to the actual mediation. The positions expressed and mediator's recommendations shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent ADR or legal proceeding. If the matter is submitted to mediation and the matter is not resolved, an affected Party shall be entitled to pursue any legal remedy available. Section 15. Miscellaneous Provisions. A. No Joint Venture. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating a joint venture or any other partnership between any of the Parties. B. Successor Bound. The covenants, terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and, to the extent permitted herein, assigns. C. Words of Limitation. Whenever the words "including," "including but not limited to," "such as" or "by way of example" or any other similar prefatory words are used in this Agreement, such words shall be deemed to preface an example or list of examples, which examples are set forth for informational purposes only and not for purposes of limitation. D. Captions and Headings. The captions and headings throughout this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and the words contained therein shall in no way be held or deemed to define, limit, describe, explain, modify amplify or add to the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement or the scope or intent thereof, nor in any way affect this Agreement. E. Plural /Singular. Wherever appropriate herein, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. F. Execution of_Counterparts. This Agreement may be contemporaneously executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. G. No Third Party . Beneficiary. The Parties understand and agree that the enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the Parties, or their successors or assigns, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any third person or entity whatsoever on such Agreement. It is the express intention of the Parties that any person or entity other than the Parties, or their successors or assigns, receiving services or benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed to be an incidental beneficiary only. H. Amendment; Waiver. No alteration, amendment or modification hereof shall be valid unless executed by an instrument in writing by each of the Parties hereto with the same formality as this Agreement. The, failure of the Parties to insist in any one or more instances upon the strict performance of any of the covenants, agreements, terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any election herein contained shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future of such covenant, agreement, term, provision, condition, election or option, but the same shall continue and remain in full force and effect. No waiver by a Party of any covenant, agreement, term, provision or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been made unless expressed in writing, duly authorized as provided by law and signed by an appropriate official on behalf of the Parties. The payment by any Party of sums due and payable hereunder, with knowledge of the breach of any covenant, agreement, term, provisions or condition herein contained, shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach. I. Notice Provisions. Any notice under this Agreement must be in writing and be personally delivered, delivered by recognized overnight courier service or given by mail. Any notice given by mail must be sent postage prepaid, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. All notices must be addressed to the parties at the following address or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time direct in writing: County: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 Boeing: with a copy to: with a copy to: President, Boeing Realty Corporation 3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 500 Long Beach, CA 90806 Attn: Mr. Philip Cyburt Fax: (562) 627 -4906 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 MC 2R -79 Seattle, WA 98124 Attn: Richard Arscott Fax: (206) 544 -7447 The Boeing Company Office of the General Counsel P.O. Box 3707 MC 13 -08 Seattle, WA 98124 Attn: Heather Howard Fax: (206) 544 -2020 KCMOFA and MOFF: Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: Chair, MOFF Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 with a copy to: King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 Any notice will be deemed to have been given, if personally delivered', when delivered, - and if delivered by overnight courier service, one (1) business day after deposit with the courier service, and if mailed, upon receipt. J. Statutory Disclaimer. KCMOFA is organized pursuant to King County Ordinance 7444 and RCW 35.21.660, 35.21.670, and 35.21.730 -.755. RCW 35.21.750 provides as follows: "[A]11 liabilities incurred by such public corporation, commission, or authority shall be satisfied exclusively from the assets and .properties of such public corporation, commission or authority and no creditor or other person shall have any right of action against the city, town, or county creating such corporation, commission, or authority on account of any debts, obligations, or liabilities of such public corporation, commission, or authority." DATED this,3 /5day of() c-fv 6zr• 2001. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Washington municipal corporation co oration Approved as to Form: By KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation EXHIBIT 1 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66°18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 1 -1 Lot 13: EXHIBIT 2 LOT 13 AND LOT 14 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS MONUMENT "D" AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY COORDINATE OF X = 1,637,871.14. Y = 195,351.46; THENCE SOUTH 72°48'11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF SAID AIRPORT; THENCE NORTH 53 °06'55" WEST 40.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28°42'13" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID RUNWAY, 381.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 262.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06 "WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 336.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2914.14 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 462.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 °54'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 211.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE CHAIN -LINK FENCE; THENCE SOUTH 28°42'13" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE CHAIN-LINK FENCE, PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 818.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 182,468 SQUARE FEET, ±4.190 ACRES MORE OR LESS EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LAND AS RELINQUISHED BY THE BOEING COMPANY TO KING COUNTY AS DESCRIBED IN AMENDMENT #25, DATED 1996; SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING 13,859 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Exh. 2 -1 Lot 14: THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 11 (1965), 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS MONUMENT "D" AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY COORDINATE OF X = 1,637,871.14. Y = 195,351.46; THENCE SOUTH 72°48'11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO A POINT 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF SAID AIRPORT AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 488.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °17'55" WEST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 61.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61 °17'55" EAST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 146.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 60 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN ACCESS TAXIWAY A DISTANCE OF 375.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 257.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 149.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 259.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 149.00 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 590.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID MARGIN 262.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 381.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 °06'55" EAST 40.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 309,048 SQUARE FEET, ±7.095 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO A 10 FOOT EASEMENT FOR SEWER, SAID EASEMENT BEING PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND LYING EASTERLY AND ADJACENT THERETO. Exh. 2 -2 • r 9.'L[ N FEET 8OE0 VG SHARED SERVICES GROUP FACIUTI( SERVICES - SEATTLE DISTRICT I 1 1 - -II 1 1 1 M TIM/S. Yr. 3 // 1.K Y PIT/4 hams.. rewMIR 801,00. ?I b /I �(Y / ADO n. LOT,.,......,.• 1 4 LOT 4,. a...•..,.. 13 .1.111111 MOM 1 �; • 3. tat ti M• as Y I�•Iw•11 t11 ti M II•II.11 �;r EXI/P1I K R / /�� rr.�.aw r� n. _ Ufa ie�i 1. // r� �....•. �. - a1. �e�e �7C �-'---� ,.. S J+Rar SAM '1�'� - -•- _ '•Y"" . r- ----- -ACS '- —.-�-• .�+ I."n Y •.s .r.WI ..- t.o �/ to ? ic. u 1111 11 .1. p .�.., iwPAOn u.i • MCI OOU IT! OITTANATOWAL AMPORT ODOM,.. NSW) neew�r eoTIAuna EXHIBIT 3 MOF CORE FACILITY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID. NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG StiID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Each. 3 -1 0828/01 MARGINAL WAY S. A BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INF0CBRHINC.COM J08 NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1'200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 M.O.F. PARCEL DESCRIPTION TUKW ILA WASHINGTON Exhibit 4 T- HANGAR RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION SCOPE OF WORK MOFF will be responsible for the following work, in accordance with the Construction Management Agreement Between the Museum of Flight and King County, unless otherwise provided or amended pursuant to such agreement. This is a preliminary summary of agreed terms; the final scope of work, budget, plans and specifications will be completed between King County and the MOFF representatives in accordance with the Construction Management Agreement. 1. Site Assessment ■ Conduct the land Survey of Lot 14 Property and Building 14 -06 Property. • Complete the geotechnical study of Lot 14 Property and Building 14 -06 Property. • Undertake appropriate planning reviews with KCIA administrator or designees. • KCIA is to provide appropriate environmental site assessments for Lot 14 Property. 2. Design • KCIA will complete the designs for the construction of a new T -Hangar A, and the relocation of the existing T -Hangar B. All design work will be performed and approved by KCIA. • Permit the MOF Expansion Project through the City of Tukwila, in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement Between King County and the City of Tukwila Relating to Processing of Building and Land Use Permit Applications and SEPA. • Obtain approval of the plans for demolition, relocation and construction, with KCIA administrator's cooperation, from FAA (FAA 7460). 3. Construction • Negotiate and pay for the construction work contract with MOFF contractor. ■ Remove hazardous material from Building 14 -06 and Building 14 -06 Property. ■ Dispose of all asbestos and other contaminated or hazardous materials located in or removed from the Building and the immediate environs at a permitted facility. • Demolish Building 14 -06 and existing wheel stops on site. ■ Remove or terminate utilities under. Building 14 -06 footprint. • Install new utilities, as required, in support of T- Hangars A & B. • Install new foundations for T- Hangars A & B, and extensions if funded by the KCIA. • Construct a new T -Hangar A and relocate T -Hangar B from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel to new foundations at the Lot 14 Property. • Install or reconnect electrical and mechanical services, and upgrade hangars to applicable codes as required. Patch, repair and replace asphalt pavement at existing hangar sites, as required. • Grade and install new asphalt pavement and tie downs around new T- Hangars A and B sites to existing taxiways. • Review the storm drainage system discharge, which will remain as is except for potential storm sewer outfall relocation. • Install tie downs for small aircraft adjacent to the Museum of Flight as agreed by the KCIA administrator. • Add additional tiedown spaces for transient aircraft at the Museum of Flight, the final numbers to be determined by the MOF designers and KCIA. • Complete the pavement striping and tie -down configuration per KCIA- approved design. • Install .a chain link security fence and electrically operated gates per KCIA- approved design for full security between the Museum and the airport property and easements, as well at the Lot 14 Property. • Provide pavement for parking heavy aircraft on the existing T -Hangar A and B Parcel or on the MOF Core Facility in a manner to allow access of other users of the adjacent airport property (as defined by multi -use easement). • Restore electrical service to Hangar C — E as needed. • Provide appropriate construction warranties on all new work on T -Hangar A, and assure the relocated T -Hangar B is relocated in a condition that meets or exceeds its current condition and meets all applicable codes. MOF will be responsible for relocation and completion of the T -Hangar B to these standards. • Identify and locate temporary space for the benefit of tenants currently in Hangars A and B, and pay the costs of temporary replacement hangar space of displaced tenants of Hangars A and B, if any, during the construction and relocation of these hangars. • Construct a replacement wash pad and drain system at a location to be agreed upon between the MOF and KCIA administrator. • Finalize the landscaping around the new hangar sites as agreed between the KCIA administrator and the MOF representatives. NOTE: Phase II site development for balance of Lot 14 to be provided for in separate agreement between MOFF and KCIA. EXHIBIT 5 SITE 3 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Exh. 5 -1 Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exh. 5 -2 DEPICTION OF SITE 3 PROPERTY e-- SUBDIVISION OF THE S.1/2 OF SECTION 33 7 7 A Scale V.600' E. ►/4 S. 33 ,o \O A 33 34 ,VENUE SOUTH 32 2 2 FAX . LAD PLAHhtt.C, 7w4ENTAL SEINICES DRAVN BY SRF DATE 12/11/00 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED BY FMH JOB N. 7416 %A. RECORD OF SURVEY / BOUNDARY LINE_ADJUSTMENT rop BOEING REALTY CORPORATION PORTIONS of the J. Buckley Donation Land Claim No. 42, Moore's Five Acre Tracts, Recorded in Vol. 9, of PLATS, Pg. 28 In the S.W1 /4 of the S.E.1 /4 & the S.E1 /4 of the S.W.1 /4 of SECTION 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian City of TUKWILA KING County State of WASHINGTON SEE SHEET 2 of 2 for SURVEY INFORMATION SH EXHIBIT 6 T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 6 -1 08/28/01 MARL INAL WAY ' 4 T-- HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIPTION TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N28'43134'W 658.80' N28'43'34'W 282.09' . tXPIFLES 3/17/ . al, to-o BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E —MAIL: INFO@8RHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1■200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIPTION WASHINGTON TUKWILA EXHIBIT 7 T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST. MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 921.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 482.91 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; . THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 519.05 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 516.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 244,544 SQUARE FEET (5.61 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 7 -1 08/28/01 XPIRES I/171_02; e-10 —o 1 T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL DESCRIPTION TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 4 ,33 atie = USH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 3 34 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFO®6RHINC.COM JOB N0 2001047.01 SCALE 1'-200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 T— HANGAR C—D—E PARCEL DESCRIPTION TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 8 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNFR OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 8 -1 08/28/01 8- 2.3 -ol MARGINAL WAY S. L S22'33'49'E 132.01' EXCHANGE PROPERTY ,� tiA,,/ // '•/ / w / / A.1 N2213'49'W .. / / 129.79' -.. 7/ / // TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ,�. N2843'34'W 658.80' BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFOO8RHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1 ".200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/23/01 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TUK WILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 9 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DEED (BOEING TO KCMOFA) After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner. BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (14 -06 Property) GRANTOR: THE BOEING COMPANY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 000160- 0019 -05 THE GRANTOR, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Dated , 2001. THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation By Its Exh. 9 -1 08/28/01 Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Exh. 9 -2 08128/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was . authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that . he /she was authorized . to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority; to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes nientioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 9 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66 °18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 9 -A -1 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS ]to be completed before recording] Exh. 9 -B -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the alternative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance No. 7444; or, in the alternative as aeronautical property as that term is defined by the Federal Aviation Administration in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ( "Boeing "), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity, of the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404 - 9002 -08 092304 - 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420- 1032 -01 000740- 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 9 -C -1 EXHIBIT 10 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DEED (KCMOFA TO COUNTY) After Recording Return To: King County Prosecutor's Office Civil Division, #E550 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -3212 Attn: Sally G. Tenney BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (14 -06 Property) GRANTOR: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 000160- 0019 -05 THE GRANTOR, KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Exh. 10 -1 Dated , 2001. KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON a Washington municipal corporation By Its Exh. 10 -2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 10 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE C'7 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOU1 r1 LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF,202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66°18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66°18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 10-A-1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS Terms and Conditi.,ns of Use Restriction Covenant contained in deed recorded under Recording No. to be completed before recording] Exh. 10 -B -1 08/28101 EXHIBIT 11 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Exchange Property) GRANTOR: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 542260- 0124 -07 THE GRANTOR, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. And reserving therefrom an aviation easement if required by the Federal Aviation Administration. Exh. 11 -1 Dated , 2001: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation By Approved as to form: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a. Washington public development authority By Its Its Exh. 11 -2 08/28(01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 1 1 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 11 -A -1 oene/oi EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS [to be completed before recording] Exh. H -B -1 06/28/01 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of King County, Washington ( "King County "), as the grantor of the Property and its successors and assigns. King County owns substantial property in the vicinity of the Property that it operates as the King County International Airport (as identified below, the "Airport Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. King County wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Airport Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Airport Property so long as some or all of the Airport Property is operated as an airport. The Airport Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: [To be completed] , 3. Enforcement. The owner of the Airport Property may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or termination by mutual written agreement of the owners of the Property and the Airport Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as none of the Airport Property is no longer operated as an airport. To provide record notice of such termination, the owner of the Airport Property will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 1 1-C-1 EXHIBIT 12 SHARED PARKING AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701. Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner Grantor: Grantee: GRANT OF EASEMENT King County, a Washington municipal corporation King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of T- Hangar C -D -E Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit D Tax Parcel Number: Exh. 12 -1 08/28/01 This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. Grantor owns those certain parcel of land legally described on the attached Exhibit A ( "the T -Hangar A &. B Parcel ") and Exhibit B (the "T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel ") (collectively, the "T -Hangar Parcels "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to (i) that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel"); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit D ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a ,part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, 'Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved parking area located under, on and over that portion of the T -Hangar Parcels legally described on the attached Exhibit E, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree:. 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, (i) a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area for museum parking and access; and (ii) a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area for purposes of the installation, operation, monitoring, maintenance, reconfiguration, restoration and replacement of stormwater drainage facilities. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T -Hangar Parcels, . is legally described on the attached Exhibit E and approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F. 3. Purpose of Grant. This purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) museum parking (including bus parking); (ii) the occasional use of a portion of the Easement Area for the movement of large aircraft between Exh. 12 -2 08/28/01 the airport taxiway located east of . the Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South; (iii) the right to install, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate stormwater detention facilities under, on and over the Easement Area; and (iv) the right to install, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate electrical utility facilities under, on and over the Easement Area. 4. Restriction. Grantee shall develop procedures with KCIA approval to ensure that Grantee's use of the Easement Area does not prevent the tenants of the T- Hangars Parcels from having continued access to parking on the Easement Area. 5. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. 6. Construction License. Grantor hereby grants Grantee a perpetual, non - exclusive license under, over and across the Easement Area, as reasonably deemed necessary by Grantee for the purposes' set forth in Section 3, to (i) restripe and reconfigure thc Easement Area to be suitable for museum parking needs; (ii) construct, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate the stormwater detention facilities; and (iii) restore the Lasement Area as set forth below. 7. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during the construction, maintenance or operation of the stormwater detention facilities to at least substantially the quality existing imniediately prior to such disturbance. 8. Ownership of Stormwater Detention Facilities. The stormwater detention facilities shall be the sole property of Grantee. 9. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee's actions. 10. Indemnity. 10.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The Exh. 12 -3 08/28/01 obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantees or its agents or employees. 10.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. 11. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 Exh. 12 -4 KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 12. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). 13. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Facility and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 14. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 15. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. 16. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. Exh. 12 -5 08/28/01 DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 12 -6 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such r arty for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 12 -7 08/28/01 l EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL. WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 921.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47 "WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 482.91 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 519.05 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 516.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 244,544 SQUARE FEET (5.61 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -B -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE.SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SF TD SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -C -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT D ■ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET A' ONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE P')INT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -D -1 08128/01 EXHIBIT E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET / ',ONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF. EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67°28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 59.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 731.61 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 75.59 FEET; SOUTH 22 °43'59" EAST 601.53 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 18.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 49,327 SQUARE FEET (1.13 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -E -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT F GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA r Exh. 12 -F -1 08/28/01 • TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N87'a7'22'W 18.93' SHARED PARKING EASEMENT eJOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1'200' DRAWN P A. CHECKED DCN D ATE 8/10/01 4.33 USH, ROED & HITC.HINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 3 34 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 . E -MAIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM SHARED PARKING EASEMENT TUKW ILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 13 SITE 3 PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Site 3 Property) GRANTOR: THE BOEING COMPANY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 562420- 1034 -09 THE GRANTOR, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Exh. 13 -1 Dated , 2001. THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation By Its Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Exh. 13 -2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged thL: he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence . that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 13 -3 08(28(01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to. the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Exh. 13 -A -1 Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment being the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exh. 13 -A -2 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS [to be completed before recording] Exh. 13 -B -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the altemative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ( "Boeing "), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity of the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property: The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404- 9002 -08 092304 - 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420 - 1032 -01 000740- 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 13 -C -1 EXHIBIT 14 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE This Second Amendment to Lease is entered into this day of 2000 between the KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority ( "KCMOFA ") and the MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "MOFF ") with reference to tl'e following: A. KCMOFA and MOFF previously entered into that certain Lease Agreement (the "Lease ") dated April 30, 1986 and that certain Memorandum of Lease Agreement (the "Memorandum of Lease ") dated April 30, 1986, recorded in King County under Auditor's Number 8605270681, and a First Amendment to Lease dated February 23, 1988, recorded in King County under Auditor's Number 8808150442. B. The Lessor and the Lessee and the County have agreed that at such time as KCMOFA obtains title to the premises known as the Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property, both of which are legally described in Exhibit A hereto, that these parcels shall be included in the Leased Premises (defined in the Lease) and become subject to the te..ns.of the Lease. C. KCMOFA has, as of , 2001 and , 2002, obtained title to the Exchange Property and the Site 3 Parcel, respectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property shall be included in the Leased Premises and shall be subject to the terms of the Lease. 2. The Lease and the Memorandum of Lease are hereby amended to include the legal descriptions of the Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property, which are as stated in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Except as specifically amended hereby, all terms of the Lease and Memorandum of Lease remain in full force and effect. LESSOR: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Secretary Exh. 14 -1 08/28/01 LESSEE: MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation By Its Chairman of the Board By Its Secretary Exh. 14 -2 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE 3 PROPERTY AND EXCHANGE PROPERTY Site 3 Property: REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for .access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way Exh. 14 -A -1 South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of said Lot C of Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment; being the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exchange Property: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 14 -A -2 EXHIBIT 15 TIE -DOWN AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner Grantor: Grantee: GRANT OF EASEMENT King County, Washington, a Washington miiriicipal corporation King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: Exh. 15 -1 08/28/01 RECITALS A. Grantor owns that certain parcel of land legally described on the attached 'Exhibit A ( "the T -Hangar A & B Parcel "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit B ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel "); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved airplane tie -down area located on and over that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel legally described on the attached Exhibit D, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree: 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement on and over the Easement Area for aircraft movement and access. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T -Hangar Parcels, is legally described on the attached Exhibit D and approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E. 3. Purpose of Grant. This purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) the movement of large aircraft between the airport taxiway located east of the .Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South; and (ii) the right to temporarily move and relocate the airplanes located at the airplane tie -downs on the Easement Area to facilitate movement of larger airplanes in connection with the operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel. 4. Restriction. Grantee shall develop procedures with KCIA approval to ensure that Grantee's use of the Easement Area does not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the tenants of the airplane tie -downs located on the Easement Area. At a minimum, Grantee must provide KCIA with a minimum of fourteen (14) days notice of any temporary movement of the airplanes located at the airplane tie -downs and secure alternative tie -down or parking space as needed for such displaced airplanes. 5. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. 6. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during Grantee's use of the Easement Area to at least substantially the quality existing immediately prior to such disturbance. 7. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee's actions. 8. Indemnity. 8.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Giantees or its agents or employees. 8.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or Exh. 15 -3 08128/0, employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. 9. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by' either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 10. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). Exh. 15 -4 11. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 13. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the- subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. 14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of, any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 15 -5 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as . the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses -and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 15 -6 08128/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28°43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -A -1 oane/o1 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE'SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15-B-1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE,NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THI POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -C -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22 ". EAST 96.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 87.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °56'41" WEST 392.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °43'59" EAST 82.54 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 305.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 29,742 SQUARE FEET (0.68 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -D -1 EXHIBIT E GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA Exh. 15 -E -1 08/28101 MARGINAL WAY S. 8-23 -0 I TIE DOWN AREA EASEMENT N28'43'34''1 858.80' N 22'33'49' W 129.79' S87'57'22'E 96.74' M3 4, /v &/ /Ai.3 /. / TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N28'43'34'W 87.13' / 7 - -- S22'43'59'E 82.54' N28'43.'34'W ,/' N87'S6'41'W 22277' , 118.89' BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFOcORHINC.COM /JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1' ■200• DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 l TIE DOWN AREA EASEMENT TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 16 TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor: King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: Exh. 16 -1 08/28/01 RECITALS A. Grantor owns that certain parcel of land legally described on the attached Exhibit A ( "the T- Hangar A & B Parcel "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to (i) that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit B ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel "); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility . ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved parking area located on and over that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel legally described on the attached Exhibit D, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agri. ement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree: 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, exclusive easement on and over the Easement Area for museum parking, aircraft movement and access. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T -Hangar Parcels, is legally described on the attached Exhibit E and, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F. 3. Purpose of Grant. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) parking and movement of aircraft, buses, cars, and other vehicles in connection with the MOF Facility; and (ii) the occasional use of a portion of the Easement Area for the movement of aircraft between the airport taxiway located east of the Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South. 4. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. Exh. 16 -2 08/28/01 5. Construction License. Grantor hereby grants Grantee a perpetual, non - exclusive license under, over and across the Easement Area, as reasonably deemed necessary by Grantee for the purposes set forth in Section 3, to (i) restripe and reconfigure the Easement Area to be suitable for museum parking needs; and (ii) restore the Easement Area as set forth below. 6. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during Grantee's use of the Easement Area to at least substantially the quality existing immediately prior to such disturbance. 7. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee's actions. Indemnity. 8.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantees or its agents or employees. 8.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not _ include .claims, costs, damages, or . expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. Exh. 16 -3 OB/28/01 9. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 10. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). 11. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T- Hangar A & B Exh. 16 -4 Parcel, the MOF Facility and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed-by the laws of the State of Washington. 13. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. 14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid, and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 16 -5 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal . corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority to to the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 16 =6 08/28101 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -A -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -B -1 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE'NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -C- I 08128/01 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88°18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET; THENCE'NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 96.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 87.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °56'41" EAST 118.69 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 222.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 35,102 SQUARE FEET (0.81 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16-D-I 08/28/01 EXHIBIT E GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA EXP1^. 9/17/ g_23 --fl I z 01 a op MA RGINL WAY S. k N 2213'49' W 129.79' TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING EASEMENT TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N2843'341'W 668.60' MINNS / — / / / / / / / S87 57'22'E / 96.74' / 428•43'34'W 87.13' 222.77' S28 '14314'E n• BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -M AIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1...200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 6/10/01 TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING EASEMENT TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 17 BOEING ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REGARDING BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY Document List: • Vista Information Solutions. Site Assessment Plus Report for South Park (Reports ID 723101901). August 5, 1999. The report identifies properties listed in federal and state hazardous materials databases.. • Memo from R. Beckerman to Landau Associates dated December 23, 1999. Request for Proposal - To provide a "Phase 1" Study for a Transfer of Real Estate. • Memo and Environmental Assessment Summary Report from S. Tochko to C. Brandt dated January 20, 2000. Terminal 128 property and Building 14 -06: 9725 and 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, WA 98108. The assessment summarizes all past environmental investigations for the subject properties. • Landau Associates. 2000. Work Plan — Soil and Groundwater Investigation, 14 -06 Building, Tukwila, Washington. August 10, 2000. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated August 29, 2000 transmitting analysis for four (4) water samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated August 30, 2000 transmitting analysis for nineteen (19) soil samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. • Memo from S. Tochko to T. Walther dated September 29, 2000. Terminal 128 property and Building 14 -06; 9725 and 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, Washington 98109. This memo summarizes environmental results of the environmental Phase I assessment conducted by the Museum of Flight and the Phase II subsurface investigation conducted by Boeing at Building 14 -06. Included in this assessment: (1) GeoEngineers. 2000. Reports — Phase 1 Environmental Assessment 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, WA 98109. May 25. This document reports the Phase I activities for Building 14 -06. (2) Landau Associates. 2000. Report — Soil and Groundwater Investigation, 14 -06 Building, Tukwila, WA. September 25. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated September 26, 2000 transmitting analysis for three (3) soil samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. Each. 17 -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT 18 DEPICTION OF AIRCRAFT TRANSIT CORRIDOR Exh. 18 -1 08128 /01 ,II/ , / , / , , •/ CA ....lie ....m.o....? ■■• 6111{121111{111{1111111::111:::1111'1111V 4111r11111111{H111■{111111 /1111117 • 1.11111_ 'AIRCRAFT TRANSIT CORRIDOR1 APPENDIX A MOF EXPANSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTIONS Appendix A -1 08/28/01 APPENDIX A Museum of Flight Expansion Description The Museum of Flight Expansion is a large scale increase to the existing facility as well as a large scale growth on the west side of East Marginal Way South. The two major building elements will be connected by a pedestrian skybridge and sweeping roof over the street to form an integrated campus.. The campus will become an icon facility easily recognizable from Interstate 5 as well as from the air. The structures on each side of the street will have three levels. EAST SIDE: Plaza Level: - The Plaza Level will be slightly lower than the existing street grade. It will feature a new entrance dedicated to the participants in the vast array of educational programs offered by the Museum. This level will include a new, exciting Educational Gallery dedicated to those programs. The Catering Kitchen will be expanded to accommodate a significant growth in the number of visitors. A large area dedicated to the preservation of the archives, library materials, and collections will also be on this level. Some areas of this space will be temperature and humidity controlled to insure preservation. This space will be accessible to researchers and scholars. First Floor: The first floor will feature a new sweeping lobby, increased retail space for the gift shop, enlarged food service cafe, and the World War II collection and exhibits displayed in the new Military Gallery. Additionally, the Red Barn will be enclosed in a new Pavilion Structure, thus preserving this very important artifact. A B -17 and other exhibits will tell the "Boeing Story". Second Floor: The second floor will house the World War I collection in a highly interactive /interpretive series of exhibits. WEST SIDE First Floor: First floor of this major new gallery will be nearly equivalent to two football fields and will house the foremost collection of significant commercial aircraft in the world. Featured here will be the very first Boeing 727,737, and 747s ever. produced. Several other significant commercial aircraft will also be displayed. Appendix A -2 08/28/01 Second Floor: This level will serve as the skybridge entrance to the Commercial Gallery with a prominent mezzanine providing an overlook to the large commercial aircraft. This space will be suitable for hosting large special events as well. Third Floor: This level will house the new Space Gallery with such exciting exhibits as Lab/Hab mock -up of the International Space Station, Lunar Excursion Module and an example of the first Sputnik space craft. Appendix A -3 08/28/01 • d @'a+ 41, aee 15d Vo i 'I n • • • • j. al; 1,1 • tui •Li Omr =-4416F,94=F-1.gm==lz75E17alli-- 11•11••■••111 •MPIMIII•1••••• 11111164111111111N1111111, II . " I F L _ _ • •=1=1•1•1•1• • •• 112 MENEM= MN , • . . . . . .■ 6 L' 2', • rlicuidiVE CIT *F TUKWILA JA4113 2002 SE PA Department of Community Developmeto 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 9�14/NYPL�Nl r E� Telephone: (206) 431-3670 FAX (206) 431 -36 ,OFTUKW1LApACTION E -mail: tukplan @ci. tkwila. wa. zu APPLICATION: - NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /Z/rt � // if.di 114.62 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. t1 ./451/ 1�ea/ • Z3di4' /- 1D/9 -47) ar.eibD -( jig -O'f1 mDe7(0 --zeol -e71 2 ;;yaq -�dvJ Quarter: S iior Township: 2y /� Range: '5 i *Olt (This information may be found on your tax statement.) '�y y DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. w 11 Name: o //G Z 074e4 Address: /let/ %�l /�"� l�l/�� cS /JL�G mr) c $ °Q# //,, z 9,1/43 Phone: Sign FAlX:(' ) ' 7 /D6- r )1)% I 11.. #--111P mordlip/ G: tIPPKANIL.-INDUSE.APP!splan.doc. 06 /13/00 Date: /P ��f/, O.2 3 FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT m2 Planner: File Number: S02.- � 9 ' Application Complete: (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete: (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: /Z/rt � // if.di 114.62 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. t1 ./451/ 1�ea/ • Z3di4' /- 1D/9 -47) ar.eibD -( jig -O'f1 mDe7(0 --zeol -e71 2 ;;yaq -�dvJ Quarter: S iior Township: 2y /� Range: '5 i *Olt (This information may be found on your tax statement.) '�y y DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. w 11 Name: o //G Z 074e4 Address: /let/ %�l /�"� l�l/�� cS /JL�G mr) c $ °Q# //,, z 9,1/43 Phone: Sign FAlX:(' ) ' 7 /D6- r )1)% I 11.. #--111P mordlip/ G: tIPPKANIL.-INDUSE.APP!splan.doc. 06 /13/00 Date: /P ��f/, O.2 3 City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist • City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: 18 Jd z44 r' -ZC?�L Applicant Name: Street Address: 91W. L 41,9.4.2/ /lid/ �. City, State, ZipkfdeG) 059 9 /dD - dVei7 Telephone: (' /. pJ P!CIJVED CITY OF TUKWILA 'JAN . 2 3 2002 PERUffeEMS DIRECTIONS Tais Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or 'No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on, Page 1, read each question carefully. circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need CO refer to site plans. :grading and drainage :inns, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. arucu-. . 200! • City of T`vila ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the net question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of grading? Gradin.g is defined as any excavatin 7, fiilins, clearing, or creation of imperious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 13.06. Zoning Code, Page 13 -11). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2 -0 Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 13.06, Page 13 -3). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 13.06, Page 13 -15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, 'storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid; solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste. regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TMC Chapter 13.06, Tuk:vila Zoning Code, Page 13 -11). Tnis includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. ip 4 Continue to Question 5 -0 . -E Continue to Question 5 -0 - 1/// a /r //hn, 1 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, i ., tton, or interception of groundwater'? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new Weil, change in :eater withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction de'.vaterinz, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches. and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis. projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements or TMC 1 3.45.060 and 13.45.080E.4. or would require a geotechnica! report if not exempt under TMC 13.45.030A. should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 6-0) YES j Continue :o Question 6 -0 0;t5 /ii //wet �e� r- 62`5 ,,`cnuan' 25. :001 Part A (continued), Ciry -.of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring outdoor maintenance chat includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, goundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chapter 13.06. Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 13- '1 3). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or «as. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete i� /i Part B: Please answer each question below for projects t at include grading . Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area. answer Yes to thjsyluestion. Please circle appropriate response. -.)01j. esponse. , ��' tj /G Ay ekopf a,' /0f NomContinue to Question 1 -3 - CUc° sb G , f Continue to Question 1 -3 S /WJ "AT 1 -3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Imperiious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the Wintry of water into the soii in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development: or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in Treater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see T vEC Chapter 13.06. Tukwila Zoning Code. Page 13 -12). Such areas include. but are not limited to, rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces. or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. Ch fr.4 C3L/- cro d%-a „ NO-Continue to Question _ -:) ( ?a'2e 2) /4;440Gaya . L!/' ate/ Continue :o Question 1- /2/11/ 40401€64 am. rcn, - -.:001 /04e/ 4V /Z'6.+1 doxs /7y�� l/ Ciry of T ' vila ESA Screening Checklist Part B (continued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stormwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a szorrnwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a stormwater management system specifically designed to infiltrate szornwater. answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Part C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction. normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mars of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 13.06.34: as any.self- supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter - breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential. minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2-4 2 -4 Wiil the project involve clearing within l00 feet of the ordinary high water mar's of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2 -= Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a ercourse or the GreevDuwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0) (Page =) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0) ( Page .) .:anucr., :_. ='00i City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emer?encv operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct aiteration of the•channei or bed of a watercourse. the Green/Duwamish rivers. cr Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area berveen the ordinar%.hiah water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bosom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a sueam. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. • Continue'to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis. "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue. to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of s`.onids. including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a . watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to.the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the project require the. removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the C-reeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis. debris includes, but is not limited to fallen trees. logs. shrubs. rocks, piles, rip -rap, submerged metal, and broken concrete cr other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity si ould answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question .3-6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -.5 rcntrcr; 2f. 201)! Part D (continued) Cin; of-Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the GreenlDuwamish or Black Rivers but do riot contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for baser.owizroundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial water.vays or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife. - articularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, 1o2, soil, or ve_etated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 4-0 (Pace 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) lanzrar v 2.5. 2001 f1. J,• • . PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CHECKLIST WEST SIDE HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT City of TukwlE ' • Department of community Development Proponent King County international Airport P.O. Box 80245 Seattle, WA 98108 Cynthia Stewart, Airport Manger October 5, 2001 Point of Contact Warren C. Pugh, AIA, The Austin Company (206) 674 -8344 � '°FiIA JAN 2 3 2002 PEST CENTER ..1. 10;( A. BACKGROUND 1. Date checklist prepared: September 21, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to commence in March 2002 and Complete in December 2002 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain. Future additions or expansions of the proJect.. are not anticipated at this time. 4. Do you know; whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal?- If explain.. None 5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: Federal Aviation Administration: • Approval of Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration — FAA Form 7460- 1 • Approval of Land Exchange between Museum of Flight and King County International Airport. State of Washington • Electrical permits King County: DDES approval for compliance with current K.C. Surface Water Manual City of Tukwila /Local: • State Environmental Policy Act Review /Approval • Construction Permits • Utilities Approvals 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This project will involve construction of 3 new one story light aircraft hangars and the relocation of one existing single story light aircraft hangar. Site surfaces adjacent to hangars will be graded and paved to accommodate light aircraft maneuvering and Environmental Checklist 1 • • parking. The project will provide for storage of 26 light aircraft inside the . hangar buildings and 18 light aircraft outside parking/tie -down positions. 13 of the aircraft hangar positions replace hangar space being eliminated by the Museum of Flight Expansion Project. A separate project, but related action to this project involves the demolition of one existing 2 story brick and steel office building, approximately 10,000 SF. This demolition will be permitted separately. Total site area is 347,639 SF. The four hangar buildings are designated Hangar 1, Hangar 2, Hangar 3 and Hangar 4. The proposed Hangar No. 1 is a new, one story, type II N steel framed building. The 10,610 SF building will have hangar space for 7 private aircraft and approximately 1,000 SF of office space. Total building height is 18 feet. The proposed Hangar No. 2 is an existing one story, type 11 N steel framed building. that will be moved from an existing location on King County International Airport • propefty;- directlynorthof -the'MClseum °of'Flight T a 15,341 SF building willhave.H,t ; hangar.space.for. 8 private aircraft. Total building height is 18'feet.•The existirng. :, building will: be modified structurally to.accommodate current building codes.:. Thg;.pooposet airgarNtit i ame..164, stoty0yp 1 ,;01teei ilia ettbuildicig` The - 22;450 SF building will have hangar space for 6 private aircraft and 6 -180 SF offices with toilet rooms. Total building height is 23 feet. The proposed Hangar No. 4 is a new, one story, type II N steel framed building. The 13,500 SF building will have hangar space for 5 private aircraft and 5 -180 SF.offices with toilet rooms. Total building height is 19' feet. 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila on the east side of East Marginal Way South, from S 86th Place to S. 87th Place and is part of King County International Airport. The site is located in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East. Exhibit A, Location in Region; Exhibit B, Vicinity Map; Exhibit C, Site Plan; The Legal Description for the two parcels affected is attached as Exhibit D 8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive? No Environmental Checklist 2 B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate .percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ?. _If you know . the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and' note any prime farmland: Refer to geotechnical report, Exhibit E. d! `' Ate'theiee'surfa dirlilldf io. 5 orr h& yof imstable,sollWirf tii'e ?iii n ediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be graded and excavated as required for building foundations, utilities and installing new light aircraft taxilane and tie -down pavement Approximate fill and grading quantities are as follows: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and utilities will be approximately 25,000 cubic yards. Location of disposal site will be determined by the construction contractor. Approximately 3,600 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 5,000 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre - approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Precipitation and surface runoff may cause erosion during grading and construction. At project completion, erosion impacts are not anticipated, as the site will be fully built out including landscaping. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Environmental Checklist 3 • • The 347,639 SF site is currently 100% covered by buildings and impervious, paved surfaces. Approximately 24,000 SF of new landscaping will be installed leaving approximately 93% of the site covered with impervious surfaces after project completion h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Some or all of the following standards methods of mitigation will be used, as appropriate: 1) Silt fencing will be placed around the perimeter of large open excavations. 2) Filter fabric will be laid between the frame and grate of all catch basins and manholes that may be subject to silt laden runoff. The filter fabric physical condition will be inspected at regular intervals,. such as_.daily,_andafter all rain events, to ensure it is property functioning. ... . 3) Straw bales will be installed around catch basin grates or in drainage paths Wheru.. silt laden runoff conditions become too heavy for the filter fabric and silt fencing, metl:tads ?,tisted.aboweut= 4) Asphalt and concrete surfaces will be swept daily during extensive grading operations to minimize silt laden storm water runoff potential. 5) Excavated soil stockpiles will be stored in lined containment areas so that storm water runoff within the containment area can be monitored prior to discharge. Additionally, the soil stockpiles will be fully covered to minimize its contact with rainfall. 6) . Disturbed areas that are exposed for over a week will be stabilized and covered with straw or plastic sheeting to minimize contact with rainfall. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will be released. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Environmental Checklist 4 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained, and wetting the site as required to reduce fugitive dust emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body_ on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (Including-Year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes =ponds 'wetiandsj-'r If yes; describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or,-! river it flows into. Iffe. p ojedt site °i§ .approximatehl. feet" "of t lett i raiiiit WaterWay. . 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters ?. If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Environmental Checklist 5 No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including storm - water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of colleation•and•disposal, of any (include.quantitles,A known).,Where.will ,; this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters ?., Existing: Source .of.site runoff would .. be rainfall:from.asphalt area:for;an.abandoned automotivecparkirigvareatw Cblieditirrittt6IttefftatirtgrtettinVeyecUttithugh a pipe storm sewer system: System conveys water to a sump, where it is joined by waters from other areas of the airport, and these waters are lifted, by pumps, to a 48" diameter conveyance pipe. This pipe conveys the water as well as runoff from the adjacent street and industrial properties to the west, a distance of about 1500 feet where it outfalls to the Duwamish River. Proposed: Source of runoff would be from asphalt for aircraft taxilanes and tie -down areas and from associated roofs for aircraft hangars. Runoff will be collected by catch basin and conveyed though a storm sewer, treated through a stormwater quality facility and then will discharge to a sump. Here the water is joined by other stormwater from the airport, and conveyed through a lift station to 2 -36" diameter pipes for a distance of about 400', where it joins the existing 48" storm sewer. The discharge from the lift station appears to have the operating capacity of up to 60 cfs and an override capacity of 90 cfs. The stormwater treatment facility has been designed in accordance with the requirements of the 1998 K.C. Surface Water Manual. The facilities have provisions for spill containment, oil control, pre- treatment and treatment. See the attached Technical Information Report (T.I.R.) for complete description. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials will not be able to enter surface waters provided the water quality measures proposed are inspected and maintained on a regular basis, and kept in operating condition . Environmental Checklist 6 d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, If any: Due to the discharge to a large body of water directly tying into Puget Sound, stormwater runoff is not being detained. Proposed water quality facilities, such as coallesing plate oil/water separators, compost filters and Stormceptors will provide mechanical means to reduce sediment and minimize the presence of oil and other pollutants. Facilities with any potential to discharge large amounts of emissions that are damaging to the environment, such as deicing facilities and floor drains, are being routed to sanitary sewer facilities. Washing of all aircraft within the project limits will be restricted to a "wash -pad" with -a?, direct -corms orrtc tha °locat'sanitarSi Sewer, ,This wiil.ensure:all- ro of #.. ; from the washing of the aircraft is not directed to the stormwaterrdrains... „An.? oil /water separator will be installed on the drain line to minimize the.amount..of:oiI entering the sanitary sewer. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs, grass, pasture, crop of grain, Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, Other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil other types Of vegetation None b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Completed project will have limited decorative landscaping. Bldg. HG. E. Marginal Way 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to, be on or near the site: Environmental Checklist 7 Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are listed below: Birds: seagulls, crows Mammals: none observed Fish: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Utilize temporary erosion, lorig•term storm water and hazardous materials controfl:!:' systems and best management practices to prevent, contaminated ditcharges ,into;tf e ` Duwamish Waterway.; , 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The design will be in compliance with the energy codes and minimize the wasteful use of energy. Hangar 1 and Hangar 2 are unheated which will minimize energy consumption. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: Usual oils, greases, fuel and solvents will be present during construction. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: Environmental Checklist 8 • No special emergency services will be required. The hazardous materials involved are commonly used at other locations at the airport and are reasonably expected to be within the capability of existing emergency service operations. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No b. Noise • 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other) ?" None, 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated..with.,the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operailon;� other)?,;. Indir.. ate whatrhoursenoise wouldzomatromilthe,sitet. Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels which range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. The project will add capacity to store 31 additional private light aircraft at King County International Airport. These aircraft would utilize existing runway and taxiway systems for take -off and landing. Increase in noise from these activities will be negligible. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. The site is not near residential uses. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for office building and parking lot for offsite aircraft manufacturing facility. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing two -story office building exists on site, which will be demolished. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. A.10,000 sf two -story steel and concrete building with brick exterior and two one - story steel covered sheds will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Environmental Checklist 9 MIC /H f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MIC /H g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed;pcojept ?? Eotrteef, O.4 )t,,ppa persortismall.offica spaaara;lacated, rvhtangar!*and:HangaG4 :,.„ which would be occupied part time. An additional' TOGO •NSF :office'space is provided in Hangar 1 which would house approximately 5 people: Hangar spaces and paved aircraft parking areas accommodate 44 aircraft, which. are occupied part time by tenants and guests performing maintenance, preparing to depart; etc. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist 10 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest building is 23 feet high. Principal exterior building materials are painted metal wall panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None-- , 11. Light and glare a., What .typp.of.tight.or glare, p oposal, produce ?.a What.tims :.ai:daywouid:,i mainly occur ?` Light and glare impacts are not anticipated. b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any? None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None Environmental Checklist 11 • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific; or cultural importance known to be on or next'tti the "site None have been identified on the project site. e . �.:.,P d�, ast» mi seduxoecontrat-finsai;- ;ii:a' Although previous excavations have disclosed no indications of archeological significance, if artifacts are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. This portion of. King County Airport is served by East Marginal Way South and entranced through signalized intersections at S. 87th Place and S. 86th Place. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop: Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project would have 20 stalls for vehicles. In addition, tenants typically park their vehicles inside their hangar when aircraft is being flown. This project would eliminate approximately 400 parking stalls, which have been rendered obsolete by the demolition of the existing building and the significant reduction of the Boeing workforce at the plant on the west side of East Marginal Way. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Environmental Checklist 12 This project would reduce the width of the road access to the site at the S. 86th Place intersection. See Exhibit E. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Project will use King County International Airport for aircraft take -off and landing. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 25 to 50 trips per day would be generated, split equally between S 86th Place and S. 87th Place intersections. The peak hours /days would occur on weekends and holidays and would be spread out throughout the day. 9. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, If any;.. Project reduces number of vehicles parked on site by approximately 400 vehicles, and alsoa ;reduces..significantlyyper.bcu z traffi , sinesthese; 4QQ ,vehickes.served:employee,w ;,. vehicles operated during peak traffic periods. ' • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an Increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. Site is served by King County International Airport Police. Tukwila fire department provides building structure fire suppression emergency response and King County International Airport Fire Department provides aircraft fire suppression emergency response. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, domestic water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer and storm sewerage are currently available with sufficient capacity to accommodate the requirements of this proposal. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Needed utility distribution systems for the project are already in place. Utility Purveyor Environmental Checklist 13 Water Tukwila Electricity Seattle City Light Natural Gas Washington Natural Gas Telephone Qwest Sewer Tukwila Environmental Checklist 14 C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Cynthia Stewart, King County International Airport Manager Date Submitted: Exhibits-- Location in Region A Vicinity Map • B Legal Description • D S. -86th Place Intersection diagram E Geotechnical Report F Environmental Checklist 15 • • EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP Puget Lake • Sound Washington King County International Airport White Center H:5709014CCIA-T liarcaVtamp1EXHIBITEC4Ng. 09/10/2001 1231:00 PM. tat 1:\ ;;. \‘'A \**4 ',,, '' 161 4' f. ,,,, ,... ‘.., fro a s • " cjI :4 v.:A (.11, • .. ikA' ..... ...-, • . •• „,‘,.., •17,, • ur'. 15_ , • • • • • EXHIBIT 13 VICINITY MAP •••• ATerminal ',Campus SITE LOCATION. • BOEING : • ;\ .• • :;.• •••••,:• ACCESS ROD • EXIT ••!. 158 Building Information Hangar Condition Description No. 1 New Building 7 position "T" Hangar No. 2 Relocated Building 8 position 'T' Hangar No. 3 New Building 6 position Ex Hangar No. 4 New Building 5 position Ex Hangar Are) 10,61 15,34 22,48 13,50 'A Support Document 9/21/01 King County International Airport Lots 13 -14 T Hangar Improvements Tukwila, Washington Site Plan THE AUSTIN COMPANY cons mn•oaiaeas•e1sws1a•oo11aIucraw Exhibit C EXHIBIT D Legal Description Lot 14 THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) N SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 11(1965), 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: , BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS MONUMENT "Di' AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND 'GEODETIC' SURVEY' COORDINATE OF X =1,637,871.14..Y = 195,351.46; THENCE-SOUTH"- 72 °48' 11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO A POINT 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF, _MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THP CENTERLII ,;OF,THE2F:.; MAIN-RUNWAY-OF-SAID AIRPORT AND THE TRUE 'POINT `OF OF- BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 488.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °17'55" WEST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 61.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61 °17'55" EAST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 146.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 60 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN ACCESS TAXIWAY A DISTANCE OF 375.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 257.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 1.49.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 259.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 149.00 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 590.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID MARGIN 262.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 381.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 °06'55" EAST 40.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 309,048 SQUARE FEET, ±7.095 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO A 10 FOOT EASEMENT FOR SEWER, SAID EASEMENT BEING PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND LYING EASTERLY AND ADJACENT THERETO. EXHIBIT D Legal Description Bldg 14 -06 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM . THE - INTER. SEC .TIONDF..T.HE.,SOUTH.LINE..OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF: BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF' SAID ' EAAWERI _YM R :1VYTH0TIC:SHQI B .OE TEE DUWAMISff R iEI ,. .fr ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66 °18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY. LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN NTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. • EXHIBIT E Proposed South 86th PL. Intersection Modifications ECHO Consulting Engneers ecn Third AVerlA% Suits 900 Seattle. Wasningtal 98101 am 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-6130 KC.1A LOT 13 PROPOSEC) S. SGTH L PRO/ MO. tow33 waE 9.18•Cf 01114. 3Y • EXHIBIT F Geotechnical Investigation To be attached King County Property Information K Home News EIMMEMEI Search Department of Development and Environmental Services 1" =400' 1" =1200' 1" =2400' 1 :24000 Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads oom to city: City Names Scale 1 Inch = 1200 feet (approximate) King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll ?name= ParLoc3 &devconval= 0001600049 &MAPSET= GEN &CityName =City 02/08/2002 King County Property Information • King County Home DES News Services • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Parcel Number Address Street Intersection Help Instructions Advanced Users Site Map Sets General Set Environrnentall Set Planning 'Set DISCLAIMER Selected Parcel Information Taxpayer Parcel Number KING COUNTY 0001600049 Cl k l' ks below for additional information tc on to Click here for Parcel Permit Information Zoom to city: CIO City Names Scale 1 Inch = 357 feet (approximate) Map Direction i y Map Level 1" =400' 1" =1200' 1" = 2400' 1:24000 PARCELS Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads Cities ED A Water God King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3& devconval = &MAPSET= GEN &CityName= City +Names &Le 02/08/2002 Assessor Assessor Assessor Assessor Real is Disat bicts;. <I 111 Parcel Residential Bldq. Commercial Bldg. Records Property Records Records Records Click here for Parcel Permit Information Zoom to city: CIO City Names Scale 1 Inch = 357 feet (approximate) Map Direction i y Map Level 1" =400' 1" =1200' 1" = 2400' 1:24000 PARCELS Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads Cities ED A Water God King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3& devconval = &MAPSET= GEN &CityName= City +Names &Le 02/08/2002 King County Property Information • King County Home News Services • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Parcel Number Address Street Intersection Help Instructions Advanced. Users Site tvlap Sets General Set Environmental Set Planning Set DISCLAIMER Selected Parcel Information Taxpayer KING COUNTY Parcel Number 0007400032 Cl k l' ks below for additional information tc on in D:i tricts . .adR4 Assessor Parcel Records Assessor Residential Bldq. Records Assessor Commercial Bldq. Records Assessor Real Property Records Click here for Parcel Permit Information Zoom to city: Go !City Names Scale 1 Inch = 301 feet (approximate) Map Direction t- Map Level 1" = 400' 1" =1200' 1" =2400' 1:24000 PARCELS Parks Streams Roads Schools A Major Roads C itl es Water Bod King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3 &devconval = &MAPSET =GEN &PARCEL = 0007400032 &sub 02/08/2002 King County Property Informan • King Cou Home News Services • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Parcel Number Address Street Itrtersectian mininummog Help Instructions Bosommirm Advanced Users Site Fylap Sets General Set l Environrnenta 'Set Planning Set DISCLAIMER Selected Parcel Information Taxpayer KING COUNTY Parcel Number 3324049011 Cl " k l' ks below for additional information ac on in Assessor Parcel Records Assessor Residential Bldg. Records Assessor Commercial Bldg. Records Click here for Parcel Permit Information Assessor Real Property Records Zoom to city: i.. GO' (City Names Scale 1 Inch = 105 feet (approximate) hiap Direction Sl- y Map Level 1" =400' 1" = 1200' 1" =2400' 1 :24000 PARCELS I Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads C itl es Water Bod King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3 &devconval = &MAPSET =GEN &PARCEL = 3324049011 &sub 02/15/2002 Planning Set I King County Property Information • King County Home News - Services • • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Parcel Number Address Street Intersection Help Instructions Advanced Users Site lump Sets =eneral Set Environmental Set DISCLAIMER Selected Parcel Information Taxpayer Parcel Number THE BOEING COMPANY 0001600019 Click on links below for additional information Dist nrcts Assessor Parcel Records Assessor Residential Bldq. Records Assessor Commercial Bldq. Records Assessor Real Property Records Click here for Parcel Permit Information Zoom to city: !City Names LID Scale 1 Inch = 113 feet (approximate) Map Direction V Map Level 1" = 400' 1" =120W '1" =2400' 1:24000 PARCELS Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads Argo Cities Water Bod King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3 &devconval = &MAPSET =GEN &PARCEL = 0001600019 &sub 02/15/2002 King County Property Information • King County Home News . Services. • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Parcel Humber Address Street Intersection Help Instructions Advanced Users Site tylap Sets General Set Environrnental .Set Planning Set DISCLAIMER Taxpayer Selected Parcel Information KING COUNTY Parcel Number 5422600124 Cl' k links below for additional information lc on to Assessor Parcel Records Assessor Residential Bldq. Records Assessor Commercial Bldq. Records Assessor Real Property Records Click here for Parcel Permit Information Zoom to city: I� G0 1 City Names Scale 1 Inch = 313 feet (approximate) Map Direction _..d Map 1 "= 400'. 1" =1200' 1" =2400' .1:24000'.; PARCELS I Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads Citie/s� Water Bod King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3 &devconval = &MAPSET =GEN &PARCEL = 5422600124 &sub 02/15/2002 King County Property Information King County Home News Services • Comments Search Department of Development and Environmental Services Search Methods: Prcel Number Address Street Intersection cnnimmi=nom Help Instructions 1=manne=5 Advanced Users Site Map Sets General Set Entmonmenta Set Planning Set DISCLAIMER 'Taxpayer Selected Parcel Information Parcel Number _ KING COUNTY 2824049007 C1' k ks below for additional information lc on lin T1 irli:4;:iqtfi 7 4 .11111 1. e ' - •,,, Ill i x., . '. li. • Mos — • =1.... ' ::= =%...; ',,1.1..1 i; ..t:I.,..., • • -_ " .101 • '.. • . 7i , ' I ..k.41-'1 • " - •4 •• A.: : •:. Mr- • t..4 r...• . • 1.1!■Eill • • .• - • • .1.. • N. oom to ctly: !City Names E.1 Scale 1 Inch = 0.89 miles (approximate) Map, Direction A 4. siav V ru1ap Level 1" = 400' 1" =1200' -1" =2400'4. 1:24000 PARCELS E=3 Parks Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads e C di W ater Bod King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to extemal sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. Page 1 of 1 .../esrimap.dll?name=ParLoc3&devconval=&MAPSET=GEN&CityName=City+Names&Le 02/15/2002 King County Property Informajon Page 1 of 1 K fg County Home 11=31111 103=111 WM= Department of Development and Environmental Services 1 "_400" 1" =120W 1" =2400' 1 :24000 Streams Roads • Schools A Major Roads oom to city: City Names Scale 1 Inch = 1200 feet (approximate) King County 1 DDES 1 News 1 Services 1 Comments 1 Search Links to external sites do not constitute endorsements by King County. By visiting this and other King County web pages, you expressly agree to be bound by terms and conditions of the site. The details. ... /esrimap.dll? name= ParLoc3& devconval = &MAPSET= GEN &CityName= City +Names &Le 02/15/2002 • • qa 61- /3,6 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA RELATING TO PROCESSING OF BUILDING AND LAND USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS AND SEPA REVIEW THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day by and between the City of Tukwila, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as the "City ") and King County, a home rule charter County in the State of Washington (hereinafter referred to as the "County") in order to facilitate orderly review of development and other activities identified in that certain Property Transfer Agreement dated November, 2001 (such development and activities are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Project "). WHEREAS, permitting and SEPA jurisdiction over the Project is currently shared by the City and the County; and WHEREAS, the County and City have determined that orderly review of Project applications is best facilitated by having the City conduct review and render decisions on both County and City Project applications; and WHEREAS, this Agreement authorizes the City to issue Project permits on behalf of King County, with the understanding that King County shall retain responsibility for confirming compliance with requirements of King County Code; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is authorized by Interlocal Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and provisions, it is agreed by and between the City and County as follows: 1. City to Process and Decide Permits on Behalf of King County. 1.1 Except as provided in paragraph 1.3, all County authority to review and render decisions on Project land use and building permit applications is hereby transferred to the City of Tukwila. Such authority includes, but is not limited to, application intake and review, application engineering review, permit decision making, permit inspections, issuance of final approvals, approvals for occupancy, and all other Project permit processing on behalf of the County. 1.2 Administrative or quasi-judicial appeals of City decisions rendered for Project land use or building permit applications, if any shall be heard and decided by the City. 1.3 In reviewing Project applications pursuant to this Agreement, King County, and not the City, shall be responsible for confirming that the applications meet County Code standards. 11NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA - Page 1 of 5 2. SEPA Compliance. 2.1 In order to satisfy the procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), the City shall serve as the SEPA lead agency for all City and County Project SEPA actions, including but not limited to Project building permit and land use applications and Project development and property transfer decisions. 2.2 Any substantive SEPA decisions relating to Project permit applications shall be made by the City. 2.3 Administrative or quasi-judicial appeals of City's SEPA threshold determinations and other SEPA matters relating to the Project, if any, shall be heard and decided by the City. 3. Financial Guarantees. 3.1 Any financial guarantee that is intended to secure compliance with project conditions required by the City pursuant to permits issued under this Agreement shall be posted with the City, which shall have authority and discretion over its release and/or enforcement. The City shall be solely responsible for making any demands or initiating any legal action to enforce financial guarantees posted for Project permits reviewed by the City under this Agreement. 4. County Legislative Authority. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to delegate King County's legislative decision making authority to the City. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, any and all King County legislative decisions relating to the Project shall be made by the County. 5. Defense. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. 5.1 The County shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and employees, or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or omission of the County, its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, in performing obligations pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, or damage is brought against the City, the County shall defend the same 'at its sole cost and expense, provided that the City retains the right to participate in said suit if any principal or governmental or public law is involved, and if final judgment be rendered against the City and its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, or jointly against the City and County and their respective officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, the County shall satisfy the same. 5.2 The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County and its officers, agents and employees or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by reason or arising out of any negligent action or omission of the City, its officers, agents, and employees, or any of them, in performing obligations pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that any suit based upon such a claim, action, loss, or damage is brought against the county, the City shall defend the same at its sole 2NITERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA - Page 2 of 5 cost and expense, provided that the County retains the right to participate in said suit if any principal of governmental or public law is involved; and if final judgment be rendered against the County and its officers, agents, employees, or any of them, or jointly against the City and County and their respective officers, agents, and employees or any of them, the City shall satisfy the same. 5.3 The City and the County acknowledge and agree that if such claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses and damages are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of the City, its agents, employees, and/or officers and the County, its agents, employees, and/or officers, this section shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence of each party, its agents, employees and/or officers. 6. Duration. This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by the City and the County and shall continue until September 1, 2006, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to paragraph 7 or extended pursuant to paragraph 8. _ 7. Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon providing at least fourteen (14) days written notice to the other party. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, the City shall cease further processing and related review of Project applications being processed under this Agreement. The City shall thereupon transfer to the County those application files and records, posted financial guarantee instruments, and unexpended portions of filing fees for pending County land use and building - related Project applications and permits. 8. Extension. The City and County may agree to extend the duration of this Agreement through September 1, 2010 or to a date prior thereto. In order for any such extensions to occur, the City shall make a written request to the County not less than (30) days prior to the otherwise applicable expiration date. Any agreement by the County to the proposed extensions(s) shall be made in writing. If the parties have not agreed to the extension in writing by the otherwise applicable expiration date, the Agreement shall expire. 9. Personnel. Control of the City personnel assigned by the City to process applications under this Agreement shall remain with the City. Standards of performance, discipline and all other aspects of performance shall be governed by the City. 10. Administration. This agreement shall be administered by the County Airport Manager or his/her designee, and by the City Community Development Director, or his/her designee. 11. Amendments. This Agreement is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral representation or understanding not incorporated herein is excluded. Any modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 12. Legal Services. The City shall be responsible for obtaining its own legal services to the extent necessary or appropriate for conducting permit and SEPA review pursuant to this Agreement. B■ITERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA - Page 3 of 5 13. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of the parties hereto: the City and County. No other person or entity shall have any right of action or interest in this Agreement based upon any provision set forth herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed. KING COUNTY I5-Zein( King County Executive Dated Approved as to Form: NORM MALENG King County Prosecuting Attorney By: IITERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA - Page 4 of 5 b Dated C,),(30( CITY OF TUKWILA Steve Mullet, Tukwila City Mayor Approved as to Form: City Attorney Dated / Z ////61 Dated 5ITERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA - Page 5 of 5 4Eo2 -ooz. TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT CITY O TUKWILA 16'k12322 PERMirt.r„, err KING COUNTY AIRPORT HANGAR RELOCATIONS TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1 EXPIRES: n I' Z..'k t October 2001 Prepared for: The Austin Company King County Airport DAVID I. HAMLIN AND ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 270 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 285 -9035 KING COUNTY AIRPORT HANGAR RELOCATIONS TUKWILA, WASHINGTON BACKGROUND /PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this traffic impact assessment is to review and summarize the impacts associated with the relocation of two existing hangars at King County Airport plus the net addition of one hangar and 31 tie -down. spaces. The hangar relocation is a result of the proposed Museum of Flight expansion that will encroach onto the current hangar site. The existing hangars are located on the east side of East Marginal Way, north of S. 94th Place. (See Figure 1.) The southernmost hangar has five spaces and the adjacent hangar to the north has eight spaces. There are also 18 tie -downs adjacent to (and east of) the hangars for a total of 31 spaces for private aircraft. The Museum of Flight expansion requires the demolition of these hangars as part of its construction; however, there will be room for 31 tie -downs upon completion of the expansion to accommodate the same number of aircraft that are currently at this site. The hangars will be replaced at a site further to the north between S. 86th Place and S. 87th Place. A 747 airplane and an unoccupied building are currently located on this site, with fences surrounding much of the site including many of the parking stalls. The site would include the replacement hangars and add a third hangar for a total of 19 hangar spaces. The site will also include 18 tie - downs. Thus, there would be a net overall increase at the two sites of 6 hangar spaces and 31 tie - downs, or a total of 37 spaces for private aircraft. (A decrease of 13 hangar spaces and an increase of 13 tie -downs at the existing site, and the construction of 19 hangar spaces and 18 tie -downs at the new site comprise the net increase of 37 spaces overall.) Access to the new hangars (designated as hangars 2, 3, and 4) and tie -downs will be from S. 86th Place and S. 87th Place east of East Marginal Way. Parking will be provided in a lot that has its access from S. 87"' Place. The main transportation impact resulting from the construction of the hangars is the encroachment of hangar 4 into the existing S. 86"' Place cross - section. This encroachment will require some realignment and narrowing of the street in order to accommodate the construction. This assessment will determine whether or not the traffic generated by the adjacent proposed and future uses can be accommodated within a narrower cross - section. (The design features of the realignment are being addressed separately by another consultant.) The remainder of this assessment summarizes the impacts of the proposed action. 1 • EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing Road Conditions East Marginal Way is a multi -lane north -south arterial ranging from five to eight lanes. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk have been installed along both sides of the street and traffic signals control many of the intersections. East Marginal Way provides a primary access route to the Boeing Development Center and Plant 2. The surrounding area is primarily industrial in nature and the posted speed is 35 mph in the vicinity of the project. S. 86`h Place and S. 87th Place extend eastward from East Marginal Way for a few hundred feet. Both of these streets, in prior years, provided access to parking areas that were leased by the Boeing Company. Both streets tie into a north -south access road that is located outside of the fenced area for Boeing Field. S. 86th Place is striped for four lanes (two entering and two exiting) whereas S. 87th Place is striped for one entering (eastbound) lane and two exiting lanes. Traffic signals control both of these streets at their intersection with East Marginal Way. The west legs of these intersections provide access to Boeing and Jorgensen Steel. No pedestrian facilities are provided on either of these streets. Currently, many of the areas adjacent to both of these streets have been fenced off, and both S. 86th Place and S. 87th Place were recently blocked off to entering and exiting traffic as a security measure following the WTC incident. Traffic Volumes A peak hour turning movement count at the intersection of S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way was conducted for this assessment from 2:00 to 6:00 PM on August 30th, 2001. Additionally, 24 -hour weekday volumes along East Marginal Way in the vicinity of S. 96th Place were available from the Museum of Flight assessment that is currently being prepared. These volumes are summarized on Figure 2. Although the east leg of the intersection of S. 86th Place was blocked off sometime in September, there was a small amount of traffic still using the east leg of the intersection at the time of the count even though there is little activity in this area. As noted earlier, S. 86th Place, in years past, provided access to several hundred parking stalls that were leased by Boeing. Peak hour traffic counts were conducted at this intersection in the early 1990's as part of the design report prepared for the East Marginal Way improvements that were completed in the mid- 1990's. The PM peak hour volumes recorded in 1991 showed a total of 205 vehicles exiting (westbound) from S. 86th Place as compared to the 21 vehicles recorded in August of 2001, a decrease of approximately 90 %. Lower volumes, particularly in the northbound direction on East Marginal Way were also noted in 2001. This decrease is associated with recent downturns in employment at Boeing. Since the subject site is being redeveloped for 2 • • hangar and tie -down space, it is highly improbable that a significant volume of traffic will ever again be present on the east leg of the intersection of S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way. Level of Service A capacity analysis for the PM peak hour was conducted at S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way in order to determine its current level of service. This intersection is currently controlled by a traffic signal. "Level of service" is a common term used in the Traffic Engineering profession that is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and its perception by motorists and /or passengers. These conditions are usually described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are designated, ranging from "A" to "F ", with level of service "A" representing the best operating conditions and level of service "F" the worst. The actual capacity of an intersection is generally considered to be at the lower end of level of service "E" and most agencies strive to maintain a roadway network that will not drop below this level of operation, except perhaps during unusual periods such as holiday shopping, sporting events, et cetera. Calculations for the level of service analyses were conducted using the McTrans Highway Capacity Software release 4.1 based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. The manual traffic count described earlier was used in these analyses and is shown on Figure 2. The following table shows the current levels of service. TABLE 1 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE PM PEAK HOUR LOCATION LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) East Marginal Way/ EB - D (41 sec.) S. 87h' Place WB - D (42 sec.) NB - A ( 4 sec.) SB - A ( 5 sec.) OVERALL - A ( 6 sec.) 3 • • Where: LOS Delay A <10 seconds B > 10 & < 20 seconds C >20 & < 35 seconds D >35 & < 55 seconds E >55 & < 80 seconds F > 80 seconds for signalized intersections Table 1 shows that the level of service for the weekday PM peak hour is currently "A ". This is somewhat better than the results noted in the traffic study for the East Marginal Way improvements where a level of service "B" (8 seconds of delay) was reported for the higher volumes present ten years ago: FUTURE CONDITIONS General As discussed in previous sections, the proposed action would result in a net increase of 37 hangar /tie -down spaces along the west side of the Airport. The area along East Marginal Way, in the vicinity of the Airport, has seen decreases in the employment levels due to lay -offs and relocations at the Boeing Company, resulting in lower peak hour traffic volumes. The Museum of Flight will be expanding over the next several years, however its impacts will be fairly limited. The King County Airport will be adding 25 additional tie -downs on the lot immediately to the north of S. 86th Place. These tie -downs would also be accessed from S. 86th Place upon their completion. The remainder of this report summarizes the new traffic impacts that could be expected from the development of the additional hangar /tie -down spaces. Trip Generation /Distribution The ITE Trip Generation Manual (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 6th Edition, 1997) typically provides data with respect to the amount of traffic that will be generated by a specific land use. However, hangars and tie -downs are rather unusual uses and no data is currently available in the Trip Generation Manual with respect to trip generation. Trip generation field data was gathered for this project at an existing site on the northeast corner of the airport. This site included 54 tie -downs and three hangars with a total of 22 spaces. Security gates surrounded all of these facilities so all entering and exiting 4 • • traffic could be captured during the counts. The counts were conducted during the same four -hour period that the turning movement count was conducted at the intersection of S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way. The trip generation during the same one -hour peak period (of the intersection) was then captured for the hangars and tie - downs. Based on the-counts, a trip generation rate for the tie -downs and hangars was calculated for each of these uses, and as a combined use. The 54 tie -downs generated a total of three trips (0.06 peak hour trips per tie -down) and the hangars generated five trips (0.23 peak hour trips per hangar space). A combined trip rate of 0.11 peak hour trips per hangar /tie- down space would result from the combination of the two types of spaces. No daily trip rate data was acquired for this project; however, a review of the Trip Generation. Manual showed data available for marinas, which could be viewed as having somewhat similar characteristics to hangars. The daily trip rate for marinas was 15.58 times the peak hour trip rate. (Daily /PM peak hour trip rates of 2.96 and 0.19 respectively per marina berth were provided.) Thus, a multiplier of 15.58 has been used to estimate the number of daily trips associated with the new hangar and tie -down spaces as a reasonable representation of the daily volume. The following table summarizes the estimated trip generation for the net increase of six hangar spaces and 31 tie - downs. TABLE 2 ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION KING COUNTY HANGAR RELOCATIONS TRIP RATE* PM PEAK TRIPS CONDITION DAILY /PM PEAK DAILY TRIPS IN OUT TOTAL 31 Tie -Downs 0.93/0.06 29 1 1 2 6 Hangar Spaces 3.58/0.23 21 1 0 1 Total Trips 50 2 1 3 Combined Rate 37 Spaces 1.71/0.11 63 3 1 4 * - Daily trip rate estimated as 15.58 times the PM peak hour rate. The trip generation values shown in Table 2 indicate that using either of the methodologies to estimate the net new trips associated with the hangar relocations would result in a very small number of new trips being generated. In either case, less than 70 new daily trips and less than 5 new PM peak hour trips are expected to be 5 • • generated. These values appear to be reasonable given the type of land use that is proposed, i.e., one that would not have the typical commuter trip pattern and is more associated with occasional recreational or business use. The new trips generated by the expansion will initially be distributed to the north or south on the adjacent street, i.e. East Marginal Way, with further dispersion to the regional facilities. A review of the peak hour turning movement count conducted at S. 86th Place showed a split of approximately 35 % of the traffic to /from the north and 65 % to /from the south that was entering or exiting S. 86th Place. This is similar to patterns previously observed in this area and will be used for the trip distribution for the hangars. Figure 3 show the estimated new weekday and PM peak hour trips for the project. All of the new trips are associated with the site between S. 86th Place and S. 87th Place (a.k.a. lot 14) since the 31 tie -downs near the S. 94th Place intersection are simply a replacement of the existing 18 tie -downs and 13 hangars spaces currently located on that site. The trips have been split between S. 86th Place and S. 87th Place since access for the hangars and tie -downs will be provided from both of these streets, although the parking area will be accessed from S. 87th Place, and therefore is expected to serve as the primary access. The trip values shown on Figure 3 are associated with the combined trip rate values shown in Table 2. The combined rate represented higher values and therefore shows a more conservative estimate. Figure 3 shows the very limited impact that the project will have on the adjacent street system. Traffic Volumes The turning movement volumes at S. 86th Place would change very little from current conditions upon completion of the hangars and tie - downs. As noted in a previous section, approximately 25 more tie -downs are expected to be developed on lot 13 immediately to the north of S. 86th Place at some time in the future. These additional 25 tie -downs would generate another 3 PM peak hour trips (2 trips in, 1 trip out) and 47 more daily trips. Otherwise, growth in traffic volumes in the area will be minimal. The hangar relocations are expected to be completed within the next year. The estimated weekday and PM peak hour traffic volumes have been shown on Figures 4 and 5, with and without the project trips. The existing volumes were increased 2% to account for miscellaneous background growth (although it is not likely volumes will increase in this area) in order to be conservative. Additionally, the three trips (2 entering and 1 existing) associated with the 25 future tie -downs on lot 13 were also included in the "without project" volumes. The trip assignments shown on Figure 2 were then added into these volumes for the "with project" condition. A comparison of these volumes with those on Figure 2 shows very little change. The volumes on the east leg of S. 86th Place will continue to be significantly lower than volumes recorded in the early 1990's. 6 Level of' Service The peak hour volumes shown on Figures 4 and 5 were used to calculate the levels of service at the intersection of S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way. For these analyses, the east leg of the intersection was assumed to consist of one inbound and one outbound lane as proposed by the site plan. Currently there are two inbound lanes and one exclusive outbound left -turn lane and a shared through /right outbound lane. The traffic signal operation was assumed to remain the same. The following tables show the resultant levels of service for the peak hour, with and without the project. TABLE 3 FUTURE PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION W /OUT PROJECT WITH PROJECT East Marginal Way/ EB - D (41 sec.) D (41 sec.) S. 86th Place WB - D (43 sec.) D (43 sec.) NB- A(4sec.) A ( 4 sec.) SB- A(5sec.) A ( 5 sec.) OVERALL - A (6 sec.) A(6sec.) The capacity analyses for the future conditions show very little change from the existing conditions. This is due the large amount of excess capacity available along East Marginal Way and its ability to serve a large volume of traffic associated with shift change peaks in this largely industrial area, and the small amount of side street volumes on S. 86th Place. The elimination of a westbound lane on the east leg of the intersection resulted in no significant change in the level of service for either the westbound movement or the overall level of service. The additional trips associated with the hangars /tie -downs are a small fraction of the total volumes along East Marginal Way and create an insignificant impact. Parking /Site Access Parking for 24 vehicles has been shown on the site plan. The parking area is located on the west side of the hangars and will have its access from S. 87th Place. Secured access to both the hangars and tie -downs will be available from S. 87th Place. A secured gate is • • also proposed from S. 8e Place, however no parking for the hangars and tie -downs on lot 14 will be constructed that will be accessed from S. 86th Place. (Additional parking will be constructed when the 25 tie -downs on lot 13 are developed at some time in the future. This parking would be accessed from S. 86th Place.) CONCLUSIONS /RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed relocation of two existing hangars and the construction of an additional hangar and tie -downs will result in a very small amount of net new traffic impacting the adjacent streets. Less than 70 daily trips and less than 5 peak hour trips are expected to be generated by the project. This amount of traffic will have an insignificant impact on the adjacent streets. The intersection of S. 86th Place /East Marginal Way was counted and analyzed as part of this assessment. The current traffic volumes at this intersection are considerably lower than the volumes that were present a decade ago. The PM peak hour volumes recorded in 1991 showed a total of 205 vehicles exiting (westbound) from S. 86th Place as compared to the 21 vehicles recorded in August of 2001, a decrease of approximately 90 %. Current volumes along East Marginal Way are also lower than they were a decade ago. As discussed at the beginning of this assessment, the main transportation impact resulting from the construction of the hangars is the encroachment of hangar 4 into the existing S. 86th Place cross - section. This encroachment will require the realignment and narrowing of S. 86th Place in order to accommodate it. The volume estimates and analyses completed for this assessment indicate that the proposed and future uses can easily be accommodated within a narrower cross - section on the east leg of S.86th Place /East Marginal Way. The total estimated PM peak hour volume on the east leg is 40 vehicles, with an estimated daily volume of less than 1000 vehicles. A two -lane urban street can easily handle this volume of traffic without experiencing any capacity problems. (A two - lane urban street can typically handle 10,000 vehicles per day or more.) The project will also impact the east leg of the intersection of S. 87th Place at East Marginal Way. No counts or analyses were completed for this intersection since its current alignment will not need to be modified like S. 86th Place will be. Furthermore, field observations indicate that the volumes on the east leg are also minimal, and the intersection will be impacted by fewer than five peak hour trips. Due to the limited traffic impacts associated with this project, the only mitigation that is recommended is the re- alignment and re- construction of the east leg of S. 86th Place at East Marginal Way. This would include any revisions to the existing traffic signal, as needed, in order to complete the re- alignment. 8 FIGURES 9 NORTH r5.7 • s 2c0 S Ft S ><;HOLDEN•^ ▪ 3ac0 S cHICAGO ST MIMISH /ER P.K; S `\N PROSE;\l `� SSO I Y Ji1aC�� r _ LLIVAN a I:.ST 'ST- . " .1 . WEBSTER ST s\ .a G AU STrw jT Mf9'�S s ST PORTLAND: ST NI ST i(ENYO,, I tyo STS v ^,I I ❑ ROSE 1 El11 NOVAN 11CC0 I J2 — ST N i —1ST ST ST " ITON= ;ST � o! H _ S. S DIRECTOR e : S =; 9200 el ST', S 9300 2 ST �• _ S 1 95TH ST;^ \1�a I b1 F j >j nI 6 S BENEFDT IST °i -1 S CNIBRIOGE g' S 1E744 e ST S �• ROXBURY ST, S BURNS 96TH 5 ss 99TH ST ITN 1L: 9\ \J 1200 TH T" 101ST .r \, ST =1 Q_; —4Z:7\ '3 2 /:� =. 1 9�. y� 02001 '^I ST:14ca .o•" {o. ''O �I >1 "j 1 ` \,) 1 �co `4/, '�' ai <I 'S 103RD 4, r —1 oi R. ST S 103RD ST n is 104TH ST' ! S -104TH sr H ;° ''> a a. 5 1060, 7 ST ,S 108 5T — - �I P5 . <' S 10611 `. PL= GC£.J 10,2£3 �t:3 107TH GOLF CLUB s� `\ RA INFER GOLF COURSE °OUNIRY CLUB { li12TH ST. 41 4 ;' r 114TH L f> I`v \ — % C'7 115TH ST _ _1.1FI14 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES HOLIDAY o YNN 1 • PROJECT VDCONOTY MAP FIGURE 1 S ";113TH: ST S - ' -S .I1an, N• ; tir 115 TH ==` KING CO. AIRPORT HANGARS PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -1 NORTH SR -99 723 08/30`01 2:15 -.515 PM 710 9 . 88TH PL. NEW HANGARS 18 TIE —DOWNS S. 87TH PL 0 >o 0 EXISTING HANGARS ,- -, ��cc 18 TIE —DOWNS �J(REPLACED WITH 1 TIE — DOWNS) '\MOF 1770 I -5 EXISTING DAILY & ?M PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FIGURE 2 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES KING CO. AIRPORT HANGARS TUKWILA, WA. PAGE F -2 NORTH SR -99 14TH AVE. S. k•. 4ti (0 9y 35% [22] ) XX% - TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE [XX] - DAILY TRIPS (X) - PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS 86TH PL. NEW HANGARS f —Ec 18 TIE —DOWNS 5. 87TH PL. -0 0 (1) G. L cn EXISTING HANGARS 18 TIE —DOWNS REPLACED WITH 3331 TIE — DOWNS c:\MOF 0 ESTIMATED DAILY & PM PEAK GLOM TROP DD OSTRO 3 UTOON /ASS GNMENT FIGURE 3 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 5 1 -5 KING CO. AIRPORT HANGARS TUKWILA, WA. PAGE F -3 NORTH SR -99 0 542 13 13 • 88TH PL. NEW HANGARS dc 18 TIE —DOWNS S. 87TH PL. >0 0 w F- EXISTING HANGARS c 18 TIE —DOWNS (REPLACED WITH 1 TIE — DOWNS 0,MOF 22235 5's 1 -5 2002 EST MATEEO DAOLY & PM PAK HOUR VOM iES WOTHOUT PROJECT MIME 4 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES KING CO. AIRPORT HANGARS PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -4 NORTH SR -99 -0 0 86TH PL. NEW HANGARS 6L .../-6c 18 TIE —DOWNS S. 87TH PL. c= ft?0 EXISTING HANGARS 18 TIE —DOWNS REPLACED WITH 1 TIE— DOWNS) cAMOF 22275 5� -5 2002 ES O ATED DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES ONLY & PM PAK HOUR VO WOTH PROJECT G OGURE 5 UMES KING CO. AIRPORT HANGARS PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -5 • APPENDIX - HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp8iw HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Analyst: GR Agency: K.C. AIRPORT Date: 9/26/01 Period: PM PEAK Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS E/W St: S. 86TH PLACE Page 1 Inter.: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF TUKWILA Year : EXISTING N/S St: EAST MARGINAL WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Eastbound Westbound Northbound L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes 0 1 1 LGConf ig. LT R Volume 9 0 6 Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 1 1 0 L TR 18 0 3 11.0 11.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 13 531 11 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 4 710 9 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A NB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds WB Left A SB Left A A Thru A Thru A Right A Right A Peds Peds NB Right EB Right SB Right WB Right Green 10.0 5.0 73.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp 1mw Intersection Performance Summary Page 2 Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 137 R 147 Westbound L 138 TR 156 1367 0.10 0.10 41.2 D 41.1 D 1473 0.07 0.10 41.0 D 1375 0.25 0.10 42.5 D 1561 0.04 0.10 40.8 D 42.2 D Northbound L 507 1703 0.03 0.82 2.0 A TR 2478 3395 0.24 0.73 4.4 A 4.4 A Southbound L 639 1703 0.01 0.82 1.8 A TR 2481 3399 0.33 0.73 4.9 A 4.9 A Intersection Delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVE. NORTH, SUITE 270 SEATTLE, WA 98109 Phone:' 206 - 285 -9035 Fax: 206 - 285 -6345 E -Mail: TRAFFICSIGNALS @MSN.COM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: GR Agency /Co.: K.C. AIRPORT Date Performed: 9/26/01 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK Intersection: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: CITY OF TUKWILA Analysis Year: EXISTING Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS East /West Street North /South Street S. 86TH PLACE EAST MARGINAL WAY HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp8 Page 3 VOLUME DATA Eastbound L T R Volume 9 0 6 % Heavy Veh 6 6 6 PHF 0.63 0.63 0.63 PK 15 Vol 4 0 2 Hi Ln Vol % Grade 0 % Ideal Sat 1900 1900 ParkExist - NumPark No. Lanes 0 1 1 LGConfig LT R Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Adj Flow 14 10 %InSharedLn Prop LTs 1.000 Prop RTs Peds Bikes 0 Buses 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Westbound L T R 18 0 3 0 0 0 0.53 0.53 0.53 8 0 1 0 1900 1900 1 1 0 L TR 11.0 11.0 0 34 6 Northbound L T R 13 531 11 6 6 6 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 143 3 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 14 583 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.021 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Southbound L T R 4 710 9 6 6 6 0.88 0.88 0.88 1 202 3 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 5 817 1.000 0.012 0 0 0 0.0 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp. mw Init Unmet Arriv. Type Unit Ext. I Factor Lost Time Ext of g Ped Min g Eastbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 PHASE DATA Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right • Page 4 Northbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 5 6 7 NB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right Green 10.0 5.0 73.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs ' VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment Eastbound L T R Volume, V PHF Adj flow No. Lanes Lane group Adj :flow Prop LTs Prop RTs 9 0 6 0.63 0.63 0.63 14 0 10 0 1 1 LT R 14 10 1.000 Westbound L T R 18 0 3 0.53 0.53 0.53 34 0 6 1 1 0 L TR 34 6 1.000 1.000 Northbound L T R 13 531 11 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 571 12 1 2 0 L TR 14 583 1.000 0.021 Southbound 4 710 9 0.88 0.88 0.88 5 807 10 1 2 0 L TR 5 817 1.000 0.012 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp8ipw Page 5 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16 -7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG LT R L TR L TR L TR So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 fW 0.967 0.967 0.967 0.967 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.943 0.943 1.000 1.000 0.943 0.943 0.943 0.943 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 fRT 1.000 0.850 0.850 0.997 0.998 fLT 0.789 0.748 1.000 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. 0.306 0.401 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 S 1367 1473 1375 1561 1703 3395 1703 3399 Sec. 548 719 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp lmw Capacity Analysis and Appr/ Lane Mvmt Group CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Flow Rate Ratio (s) (v /s) Adj Flow Rate (v) • Page 6 Green Ratio (g /C) - -Lane Group- - Capacity v/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT Right R Westbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right Northbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right Southbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right 14 1367 0.01 10 1473 0.01 34 6 14 0 14 583 5 0 5 817 1375 1561 1703 548 # 0.02 0.00 # 0.01 0.00 3395 0.17 1703 0.00 719 0.00 3399 0.24 0.10 137 0.10 147 0.10 0.07 0.10 138 0.25 0.10 156 0.04 0.050 85 0.16 0.770 422 0.00 0.82 507 0.03 0.73 2478 0.24 0.050 85 0.06 0.770 554 0.00 0.82 639 0.01 0.73 2481 0.33 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v /s) = 0.27 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C) /(C -L) = 0.31 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp8llkw Page 7 Control Delay and LOS Determination Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.10 0.10 40.9 R 0.07 0.10 40.8 Westbound L 0.25 0.10 41.5 TR 0.04 0.10 40.7 Northbound L 0.03 0.82 2.0 TR 0.24 0.73 4.4 Southbound L 0.01 0.82 1.8 TR 0.33 0.73 4.8 1.000 137 1.000 147 1.000 138 1.000 156 0.11 0.3 0.0. 41.2 D 41.1 D 0.11 0.2 0.0 41.0 D 0.11 0.9 0.0 42.5 D 0.11 0.1 0.0 40.8 D 42.2 D 1.000 507 0.11 1.000 2478 0.11 1.000 639 0.11 1.000 2481 0.11 0.0 0.0 2.0 A 0.0 0.0 4.4 A 0.0 0.0 1.8 A 0.1 0.0 4.9 A 4.4 A 4.9 A Intersection delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xplemw Input Page 8 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) Opposing effective green time, go (s) Number of lanes in LT lane group, N Number of lanes in opposing approach, No Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) Lost time for LT lane group, tL Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo Opposing flow, Volc= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf< =g Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) gu =g -gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq<gf n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) PTHo= 1 -PLTo PL *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g gdiff = max(gq -gf,0) fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin= fmin;max =1.00) flt= fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g] /[1 +PL(EL1 -1)] +[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin< =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT EB 1.00 WB NB SB 10.0 82.0 82.0 10.0 77.0 77.0 10.0 73.0 73.0 1 1 1 1 2 2 34 14 5 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.00 0.00 0.00 14 817 583 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.94 0.39 0.14 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.39 11.94 8.52 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.27 0.27 ` 0.00 8.47 5.55 10.00 68.53 71.45 0.00 4.24 2.77 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 2.91 2.31 0.40 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.31 0.40 0.748 0.306 0.401 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1 > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xpsnw • Page 9 Input SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts EB WB NB SB Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 10.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) 10.0 Opposing effective green time, go (s) 10.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 1 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) 14 Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 1.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo 0.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) 6 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 4.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 0.39 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Opposing flow, Volc= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) 0.17 gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf< =g 2.4 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] 0.90 gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) 0.00 gu =g -gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq <gf 7.61 n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) 0.00 PTHo= 1 -PLTo 1.00 PL *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] 1.00 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) 1.38 EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g 0.40 gdiff = max(gq -gf,0) 0.00. fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin= fmin;max =1.00) 0.79 flt= fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g] /[1 +PL(EL1 -1)] +[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin< =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT 0.789 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xplenw • Page 10 SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN- BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p /h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq /gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) OCCr Number of cross - street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left -turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles /h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross - street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion right- turns, PRT Proportion right -turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb EB WB NB SB SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 14 5 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.03 0.01 Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) 5.0 5.0 Opposing queue effective green interval, gq 8.47 5.55 Unopposed green interval, gu 68.53 71.45 Red time r= (C- g- gq -gu) 18.0 18.0 Arrival rate, qa= v /(3600(max[X,1.0])) 0.00 0.00 Protected ph. departure rate, Sp= s/3600 0.473 0.473 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss= s(gq +gu) /(gu *3600) 0.17 0.22 XPerm 0.03 0.01 XProt 0.04 0.01 Case 1 1 Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa 0.07 0.03 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 0.03 0.01 Residual queue, Qr 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay, di 2.0 1.8 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Xp8w • Page 11 DELAY /LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Appr/ Unmet Unmet Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec Initial Final Initial Lane Queue Unmet Queue Group Param. Demand Delay Delay u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 6.3 LaneGroup Init Queue Flow Rate So No.Lanes 0 SL LnCapacity Flow Ratio v/c Ratio Grn Ratio I Factor AT or PVG Pltn Ratio PF2 Q1 kB Q2 Q Average Q Spacing Q Storage Q S Ratio 70th Percentile Output: fB% - 1.2 1.2 BOQ 0.5 0.3 QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: Eastbound LT R 0.0 0.0 14 10 1900 1900 1 1 1367 1473 137 147 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.07 0.10 0.10 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 sec /veh Intersection LOS A BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET Westbound Northbound L TR 0.0 0.0 34 6 1900 1900 1 1 0 1375 1561 138 156 0.02 0.00 0.25 0.04 0.10 0.10 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.2 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.2 L TR 0.0 0.0 14 291 1900 1900 1 2 0 1703 1697 85 1239 0.01 0.17 0.16 0.23 0.82 0.73 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 2.6 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.5 2.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 0.7 3.4 Southbound L TR 0.0 0.0 5 408 1900 1900 1 2 0 1703 1699 85 1240 0.00 0.24 0.06 0.33 0.82 0.73 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.1 4.0 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.2 4.4 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 0.2 5.3 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:XpilOmw B% 1 1.6 1.6 11.6 1.6 BOQ 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.3 QSRatio 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 BOQ 0.7 0.5 1.7 0.3 QSRatio 95th Percentile Output: fB% 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 BOQ 0.8 0.6 2.0 0.3 QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: fB% 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.7 BOQ 1.0 0.7 2.5 0.4 QSRatio 1 11.6 1.6 0.9 4.5 1.8 1.7 1.0 5.0 2.1 2.0 1.1 5.8 2.7 2.5 1.5 7.2 Page 12 11.6 1.6 0.3 6.9 1.8 1.7 0.3 7.6 2.1 2.0 0.4 8.7 2.7 2.4 0.5 10.7 ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. HCS- Signals 4.1 Fi1e:Fp841,w • Page 1 HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 Inter.: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF TUKWILA Year : 2002 W /OUT PROJECT Analyst: GR Agency: K.C. AIRPORT Date: 10/16/01 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS E/W St: S. 86TH PLACE No. Lanes LGConfig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R N/S St: EAST MARGINAL WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 1 1 LT R 9 0 6 11.0 11.0 0 0 1 0 LTR 19 0 3 11.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 13 542 13 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 4 724 9 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Phase Combination 1 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green Yellow All Red 10.0 4.0 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 5 6 A A A NB Left A Thru Right Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds. EB Right WB Right 5.0 73.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 7 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 2 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 132 1322 0.11 0.10 41.3 D 41.2 D R 147 1473 0.07 0.10 41.0 D Westbound LTR 136 1355 0.31 0.10 43.1 D 43.1 D Northbound L 499 1703 0.03 0.82 2.0 A TR 2478 3394 0.24 0.73 4.5 A 4.4 A Southbound L 630 1703 0.01 0.82 1.8 A TR 2482 3400 0.34 0.73 4.9 A 4.9 A Intersection Delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVE. NORTH, SUITE 270 SEATTLE, WA 98109 Phone: 206 - 285 -9035 Fax: 206 - 285 -6345 E -Mail: TRAFFICSIGNALS @MSN.COM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: GR Agency /Co.: K.C. AIRPORT Date Performed: 10/16/01 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: CITY OF TUKWILA Analysis Year: 2002 W /OUT PROJECT Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS East /West Street North /South Street S. 86TH PLACE EAST MARGINAL WAY • • HCS- Signals 4:1 File:Fp86emw Page 3 VOLUME DATA Eastbound L T R Volume 9 0 6 % Heavy Veh 6 6 6 PHF 0.63 0.63 0.63 PK.15 Vol 4 0 2 Hi Ln Vol % Grade 0 Ideal Sat 1900 1900 ParkExist NumPark No. Lanes 0 1 1 LGConfig LT R Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Adj Flow 14 10 %InSharedLn Prop LTs 1.000 Prop RTs Peds Bikes 0 Buses 0 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Westbound L T R 19 0 3 0 0 0 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 0 1 0 1900 0 1 0 LTR 11.0 0 42 Northbound L T R 13 542 13 6 6 6 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 146 4 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 14 597 0.857 1.000 0.143 0.023 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 All other areas Area Type: Southbound L T R 4 724 9 6 6 6 0.88 0.88 0.88 1 206 3 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 5 833 1.000 0.012 0 0 0 0.0 • • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 4 Init Unmet Arriv. Type Unit Ext. I Factor Lost Time Ext of g Ped Min g Eastbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound L T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 3.2 PHASE DATA Northbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 • 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right NB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right Green 10.0 5.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs 73.0 4.0 0.0 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment Eastbound L T R Volume, V PHF Adj flow No. Lanes Lane group Adj flow Prop LTs Prop RTs 9 0 6 0.63 0.63 0.63 14 0 10 0 1 1 LT R 14 10 1.000 Westbound L T R 19 0 3 0.53 0.53 0.53 36 0 6 0 1 0 LTR 42 0.857 0.143 Northbound L T R 13 542 13 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 583 14 1 2 0 L TR 14 597 1.000 0.023 Southbound L T R 4 724 9 0.88 0.88 0.88 5 823 10 1 2 0 L TR 5 833 1.000 0.012 • • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 5 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16 -7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG LT R LTR L TR L TR So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 fW 0.967 0.967 0.967 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.943 0.943 1.000 0.943 0.943 0.943 0.943 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 fRT 1.000 0.850 0.981 0.996 0.998 fLT 0.763 0.753 0.950 1.000 0.950 1.000 Sec. 0.300 0.395 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 S 1322 1473 1355 1703 3394 1703 3400 Sec. 538 708 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Capacity Analysis and Appr/ Lane Mvmt Group Page 6 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET Lane Group Capacity Adj Sat Flow Flow Rate Ratio (s) (v /s) Adj Flow Rate (v) Green Ratio (g /C) - -Lane Group- - Capacity v/c (c) Ratio Eastbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT Right R Westbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR Right Northbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right Southbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right 14 1322 0.01 10 1473 0.01 42 14 0 14 597 5 0 5 0.10 132 0.11 0.10 147 0.07 1355 # 0.03 0.10 1703 # 0.01 538 0.00 3394 0.18 0.73 1703 0.00 708 0.00 0.050 0.770 0.82 0.050 0.770 0.82 136 0.31 85 0.16 414 0.00 499 0.03 2478 0.24 85 0.06 545 0.00 630 0.01 833 3400 0.25 0.73 2482 0.34 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v /s) = 0.28 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C) /(C -L) = 0.32 • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw • Page 7 Control Delay and LOS Determination Appr / Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del 3rp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 Res Lane Group Approach Del d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.11 0.10 40.9 1.000 132 R 0.07 0.10 40.8 1.000 147 Westbound LTR 0.31 0.10 41.8 Northbound I, 0.03 0.82 2.0 TR 0.24 0.73 4.4 Southbound L 0.01 0.82 1.8 TR 0.34 0.73 4.8 0.11 0.4 0.0 41.3 D 41.2 D 0.11 0.2 0.0 41.0 D 1.000 136 0.11 1.3 0.0 43.1 D 43.1 D 1.000 499 0.11 0.0 0.0 2.0 A 1.000 2478 0.11 0.1 0.0 4.5 A 4.4 A 1.000 630 0.11 0.0 0.0 1.8 A 1.000 2482 0.11 0.1 0.0 4.9 A 4.9 A Intersection delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 8 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts Input EB WB NB SB Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 82.0 82.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) 77.0 77.0 Opposing effective green time, go (s) 73.0 73.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 2 2 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) 14 5 Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 1.000 1.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo 0.00 0.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) 833 597 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 4.00 4.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 0.39 0.14 1.00 0.95 0.95 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.00 1.012.18 8.73 Opposing flow, Vo1c= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf< =g 0.0 0.0 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) 1.00 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] 0.27 0.27 gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) 8.69 5.71 gu=g-gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq <gf 68.31 71.29 n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) 4.35 2.85 PTHo= 1 -PLTo 1.00 1.00 PL *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] 1.00 1.00 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) 2.96 2.35 EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g 0.00 0.00 gdiff= max(gq -gf,0) fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin= fmin;max =1.00) 0.30 0.39 flt= fm=[ gf/ g]+[ gu/ g]/[ 1+ PL( EL1- 1)]+[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin < =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT 0.748 0.300 0.395 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If P1 > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. • • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 9 SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts Input Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 10.0 10.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) 10.0 10.0 Opposing effective green time, go (s) 10.0. 10.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 1 1 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) 14 36 Proportion of LT in-LT lane group, PLT 1.000 0.857 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo 0.86 1.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) 42 14 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 4.00 4.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 0.39 1.00 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Opposing flow, Volc= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) 1.17 0.39 gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf< =g 2.2 0.2 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) 1.00 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] 0.90 0.90 gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) 0.97 0.00 gu =g -gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq<gf 7.78 9.77 n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) 0.00 0.00 PTHo= 1 -PLTo 0.14 0.00 PL *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] 1.00 0.86 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) 1.44 1.40 EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) 1.00 fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g 0.40 0.37 gdiff= max(gq -gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin= fmin;max =1.00) 0.76 0.75 flt= fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g] /[1 +PL(EL1 -1)] +[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin < =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT 0.763 0.753 EB WB NB SB For special see text. * If Pl > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 10 SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns EB WB NB SB Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p /h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq /gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) OCCr Number of cross - street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left -turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles /h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross - street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion right- turns, PRT Proportion right -turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 14 5 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.03 0.01 Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) 5.0 5.0 Opposing queue effective green interval, gq 8.69 5.71 Unopposed green interval, gu 68.31 71.29 Red time r= (C- g- gq -gu) 18.0 18.0 Arrival rate, qa= v /(3600(max[X,1.0])) 0.00 0.00 Protected ph. departure rate, Sp= s/3600 0.473 0.473 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss= s(gq +gu) /(gu *3600) 0.17 0.21 XPerm 0.03 0.01 XProt 0.04 0.01 Case 1 1 Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa 0.07 0.03 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 0.03 0.01 Residual queue, Qr 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay, dl 2.0 1.8 • . HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 11 DELAY /LOS WORKSHEET .WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Initial Final Initial Lane Appr/ Unmet Unmet Queue Unmet Queue Group Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Param. Demand Delay Delay Group Q veh t hrs. ds dl sec u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound -Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 6.3 sec /veh Intersection LOS A Eastbound LaneGroup LT R Init Queue 0.0 0.0 Flow Rate 14 10 So 1900 1900 No.Lanes 0 1 1 SL 1322 1473 LnCapacity 132 147 Flow Ratio 0.01 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.07 Grn Ratio 0.10 0.10 I Factor 1.000 AT or PVG 3 3 Pltn Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 PF2 1.00 1.00 Q1 0.4 0.3 kB 0.2 0.2 Q2 0.0 0.0 Q Average 0.4 0.3 Q Spacing 24.9 24.9 24.9 Q Storage 0 . 0 0 Q S Ratio 70th Percentile Output: fB% 1.2 1 2 BOQ 0.5 0 3 •QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: BACK OF QUEUE Westbound LTR 0.0 42 1900 0 1 0 1355 136 0.03 0.31 0.10 1.000 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.1 0.2 0.1 1.2 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 WORKSHEET 1.2 1.4 Northbound Southbound L TR L TR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14 298 5 416 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1 2 0 1 2 0 1703 1697 1703 1700 85 1239 85 1241 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.24 0.16 0.24 0.06 0.34 0.82 0.73 0.82 0.73 1.000 1.000 3 3 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 2.7 0.1 4.1 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.5 3.0 0.2 4.6 24.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 0.7 3.5 1.2 1.2 0.2 5.4 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Fp86emw Page 12 B% I 1.6 1.6 BOQ 0.6 0.4 QSRatio 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1.8 1.8 BOQ 0.7 0.5 QSRatio 95th Percentile Output: fB% 2.1 2.1 BOQ 0.8 0.6 QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: fB% 2.7 2.7 BOQ 1.0 0.7 QSRatio 1.6 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.4 2:6 3.1 11.6 1.6 0.9 4.7 1.8 1.7 1.0 5.2 2.1 2.0 1.1 6.0 2.7 2.5 1.5 7.4 11.6 1.6 0.3 7.1 1.8 1.7 0.3 7.8 2.1 2.0 0.4 8.9 2.7 2.4 0.5 10.9 ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp8ew HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 • Page 1 Analyst: GR Agency: K.C. AIRPORT Date: 10/16/01 Period: PM PEAK HOUR Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS E/W St: S. 86TH PLACE No. Lanes LGConf ig Volume Lane Width RTOR Vol Eastbound L T R Inter.: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisd: CITY OF TUKWILA Year : 2002 WITH PROJECT N/S St: EAST MARGINAL WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 0 1 1 LT R 9 0 6 11.0 11.0 0 19 1 0 LTR 0 3 11.0 0 1 2 0 L TR 13 542 13 12.0 12.0 0 Southbound L T R 1 2 0 L TR 5 724 9 12.0 12.0 0 Duration 0.25 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right Green 10.0 Yellow 4.0 All Red 0.0 5 6 A A A NB Left A Thru Right Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right 5.0 73.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 7 8 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs • HCS -Signals 4.1 File:D 86emw Page 2 Intersection Performance Summary Appr/ Lane Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Lane Group Flow Rate Grp Capacity (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 132 1322 0.11 0.10 41.3 D 41.2 D R 147 1473 0.07 0.10 41.0 D Westbound LTR 136 1355 0.31 0.10 43.1 D 43.1 D Northbound L 499 1703 0.03 0.82 2.0 A TR 2478 3394 0.24 0.73 4.5 A 4.4 A Southbound L 630 1703 0.01 0.82 1.8 A TR 2482 3400 0.34 0.73 4.9 A 4.9 A Intersection Delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS2000: Signalized Intersections Release 4.1 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVE. NORTH, SUITE 270 SEATTLE, WA 98109 Phone: 206 - 285 -9035 Fax: 206- 285 -6345 E -Mail: TRAFFICSIGNALS @MSN.COM OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Analyst: GR Agency /Co.: K.C. AIRPORT Date Performed: 10/16/01 Analysis Time Period: PM PEAK HOUR Intersection: S. 86TH PL. /EAST MARGINAL WAY Area Type: All other areas Jurisdiction: CITY OF TUKWILA Analysis Year: 2002 WITH PROJECT Project ID: HANGAR RELOCATIONS East /West Street North /South Street S. 86TH PLACE EAST MARGINAL WAY HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86e�izw • Page 3 VOLUME DATA Eastbound L T R Volume 9 0 6 % Heavy Veh 6 6 6 PHF 0.63 0.63 0.63 PK 15 Vol 4 0 2 Hi Ln Vol % Grade 0 % Ideal Sat 1900 1900 ParkExist NumPark No. Lanes 0 1 1 LGConfig LT R Lane Width 11.0 11.0 RTOR Vol 0 Adj Flow 14 10 %InSharedLn Prop LTs 1.000 Prop RTs Peds Bikes 0 Buses 0 0 %InProtPhase Duration 0.25 Westbound L T R 19 0 3 0 0 0 0.53 0.53 0.53 9 0 1 0 1900 0 1 0 LTR 11.0 0 42 Northbound L T R 13 542 13 6 6 6 0.93 0.93 0.93 4 146 4 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 14 597 0.857 1.000 0.143 0.023 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Area Type: All other areas Southbound L T R 5 724 9 6 6 6 0.88 0.88 0.88 2 206 3 0 1900 1900 1 2 0 L TR 12.0 12.0 0 6 833 1.000 0.012 0 0 0 0.0 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 4 Init Unmet Arriv. Type Unit Ext. I Factor Lost Time Ext of g Ped Min g Eastbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 OPERATING PARAMETERS Westbound L .T R 0.0 3 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 3.2 PHASE DATA Northbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 Southbound L T R 0.0 0.0 3 3 3.0 3.0 1.000 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.2 Phase Combination 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 EB Left A Thru A Right A Peds WB Left A Thru A Right A Peds NB Right SB Right NB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds SB Left A A Thru A Right A Peds EB Right WB Right Green 10.0 5.0 Yellow 4.0 4.0 All Red 0.0 0.0 73.0 4.0 0.0 Cycle Length: 100.0 secs VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW WORKSHEET Volume Adjustment Eastbound L T R Volume, V PHF Adj flow No. Lanes Lane group Adj flow Prop LTs Prop RTs 9 0 6 0.63 0.63 0.63 14 0 10 0 1 1 LT R 14 10 1.000 Westbound L T R 19 0 3 0.53 0.53 0.53 36 0 6 0 1 0 LTR 42 0.857 0.143 Northbound L T R 13 542 13 0.93 0.93 0.93 14 583 14 1 2 0 L TR 14 597 1.000 0.023 Southbound L T R 5 724 9 0.88 0.88 0.88 6 823 10 1 2 0 L TR 6 833 1.000 0.012 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86em w Page 5 Saturation Flow Rate (see Exhibit 16 -7 to determine the adjustment factors) Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound LG LT R LTR. L TR L TR So 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 fW 0.967 0.967 0.967 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.943 0.943 1.000 0.943 0.943 0.943 0.943 fG 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fP 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fBB 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 fRT 1.000 0.850 0.981 0.996 0.998 fLT 0.763 0.753 0.950 1.000 0.950.1.000 Sec. 0.300 0.395 fLpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fRpb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 S 1.322 1473 1355 1703 3394 1703 3400 Sec. 538 708 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Capacity Analysis Appr/ Lane Mvmt Group • Page 6 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET and Lane Group Capacity Adj Adj Sat Flow Flow Rate Flow Rate Ratio (v) (s) (v /s) Green - -Lane Group- - Ratio Capacity v/c (g /C) (c) Ratio Eastbound, Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LT Right R Westbound Prot Perm Left Prot Perm Thru LTR Right Northbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right Southbound Prot Perm Left L Prot Perm Thru TR Right 14 1322 0.01 10 1473 0.01 42 1355 # 0.03 14 1703 # 0.01 0 538 0.00 14 597 3394 0.18 6 0 6 833 1703 0.00 708 0.00 3400 0.25 0.10 132 0.10 147 0.10 0.050 0.770 0.82 0.73 0.050 0.770 0.82 0.73 0.11 0.07 136 0.31 85 0.16 414 0.00 499 0.03 2478 0.24 85 0.07 545- 0.00 630 0.01 2482 0.34 Sum of flow ratios for critical lane groups, Yc = Sum (v /s) = 0.28 Total lost time per cycle, L = 12.00 sec Critical flow rate to capacity ratio, Xc = (Yc)(C) /(C -L) = 0.32 • - HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 7 Control Delay and LOS Determination Appr/ Ratios Unf Prog Lane Incremental. Res Lane Group Approach Lane Del Adj Grp Factor Del Del Grp v/c g/C dl Fact Cap k d2 d3 Delay LOS Delay LOS Eastbound LT 0.11 0.10 40.9 1.000 132 0.11 0.4 0.0 41.3 D 41.2 D R 0.07 0.10 40.8 1.000 147 0.11 0.2 0.0 41.0 D Westbound LTR 0.31 0.10 41.8 1.000 136 0.11 1.3 0.0 43.1 D 43.1 D Northbound 0.03 0.82 2.0 1.000 499 0.11 0.0 0.0 2.0 A TR 0.24 0.73 4.4 1.000 2478 0.11 0.1 0.0 4.5 A 4.4 Southbound L 0.01 0.82 1.8 1.000 630 0.11 0.0 0.0 1.8 A TR 0.34 0.73 4.8 1.000 2482 0.11 0.1 0.0 4.9 A 4.9 A Intersection delay = 6.3 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A • HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 8 Input SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for exclusive lefts EB WB NB SB Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 82.0 82.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) 77.0 77.0 Opposing effective green time, go (s) 73.0 73.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 2 2 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) 14 6 Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 1.000 1.000 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo 0.00 0.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) 833 597 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 4.00 4.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 0.39 0.17 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Opposing flow, Volc= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) 12.18 8.73 gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf < =g 0.0 0.0 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) 1.00 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] 0.27 0.27 gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) 8.69 5.71 gu =g -gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq<gf 68.31 71.29 n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) 4.35 2.85 PTHo= 1 -PLTo 1.00 1.00 PL *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] 1.00 1.00 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) 2.96 2.35 EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g 0.05 0.05 gdiff= max(gq -gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin = fmin;max =1.00) 0.30 0.39 flt= fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g] /[1 +PL(EL1 -1)] +[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin< =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT 0.748 0.300 0.395 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 9 Input SUPPLEMENTAL PERMITTED LT WORKSHEET for shared lefts EB WB NB SB Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Total actual green time for LT lane group, G (s) 10.0 10.0 Effective permitted green time for LT lane group, g(s) 10.0 10.0 Opposing effective green time, go (s) 10.0 10.0 Number of lanes in LT lane group, N 1 1 Number of lanes in opposing approach, No 1 1 Adjusted LT flow rate, VLT (veh /h) 14 36 Proportion of LT in LT lane group, PLT 1.000 0.857 Proportion of LT in opposing flow, PLTo 0.86 1.00 Adjusted opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) 42 14 Lost time for LT lane group, tL 4.00 4.00 Computation LT volume per cycle, LTC =VLTC /3600 0.39 1.00 Opposing lane util. factor, fLUo 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Opposing flow, Volc= VoC /[3600(No)fLUo] (veh /ln /cyc) 1.17 0.39 gf= G[exp(- a * (LTC ** b))] -tl, gf < =g 2.2 0.2 Opposing platoon ratio, Rpo (refer Exhibit 16 -11) 1.00 1.00 Opposing Queue Ratio, qro= Max[1- Rpo(go /C),0] 0.90 0.90 gq, (see Exhibit C16- 4,5,6,7,8) 0.97 0.00 gu =g -gq if gq > =gf, or = g -gf if gq <gf 7.78 9.77 n= Max(gq- gf) /2,0) 0.00 0.00 PTHo= 1 -PLTo 0.14 0.00 P L *= PLT[1 +(N- 1)g /(gf +gu /EL1 +4.24)] 1.00 0.86 EL1 (refer to Exhibit C16 -3) 1.44 1.40 EL2= Max((1- Ptho * *n) /Plto, 1.0) 1.00 fmin= 2(1 +PL) /g or fmin= 2(1 +P1) /g 0.40 0.37 gdiff = max(gq -gf,0) 0.00 0.00 fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g][1 +PL(EL1 -1)], (fmin= fmin;max =1.00) 0.76 0.75 flt= fm= [gf /g] +[gu /g] /[1 +PL(EL1 -1)] +[ gdiff /g] /[1 +PL(EL2- 1)],(fmin < =fm< =1.00) or flt= [fm +0.91(N- 1)] /N ** Left -turn adjustment, fLT 0.763 0.753 For special case of single -lane approach opposed by multilane approach, see text. * If Pl > =1 for shared left -turn lanes with N >1, then assume de -facto left -turn lane and redo calculations. ** For permitted left -turns with multiple exclusive left -turn lanes, flt =fm. For special case of multilane approach opposed by single -lane approach or when gf >gq, see text. HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 10 SUPPLEMENTAL PEDESTRIAN - BICYCLE EFFECTS WORKSHEET Permitted Left Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg (p /h) OCCpedg Opposing queue clearing green, gq (s) Eff. ped. green consumed by opp. veh. queue, gq /gp OCCpedu Opposing flow rate, Vo (veh /h) OCCr Number of cross - street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion of left turns, PLT Proportion of left turns using protected phase, PLTA Left -turn adjustment, fLpb Permitted Right Turns Effective pedestrian green time, gp (s) Conflicting pedestrian volume, Vped (p /h) Conflicting bicycle volume, Vbic (bicycles /h) Vpedg OCCpedg Effective green, g (s) Vbicg OCCbicg OCCr Number of cross- street receiving lanes, Nrec Number of turning lanes, Nturn ApbT Proportion right - turns, PRT Proportion right -turns using protected phase, PRTA Right turn adjustment, fRpb EB WB NB SB SUPPLEMENTAL UNIFORM DELAY WORKSHEET EBLT WBLT NBLT SBLT Cycle length, C 100.0 sec Adj. LT vol from Vol Adjustment Worksheet, v 14 6 v/c ratio from Capacity Worksheet, X 0.03 0.01 Protected phase effective green interval, g (s) 5.0 5.0 Opposing queue effective green interval, gq 8.69 5.71 Unopposed green interval, gu 68.31 71.29 Red time r= (C- g- gq -gu) 18.0 18.0 Arrival rate, qa= v /(3600(max[X,1.0])) 0.00 0.00 Protected ph. departure rate, Sp= s/3600 0.473 0.473 Permitted ph. departure rate, Ss= s(gq +gu) /(gu *3600) 0.17 0.21 XPerm 0.03 0.01 XProt 0.04 0.02 Case 1 1 Queue at beginning of green arrow, Qa 0.07 0.03 Queue at beginning of unsaturated green, Qu 0.03 0.01 Residual queue, Qr 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay, dl 2.0 1.8 ' HCS- Signals 4.1 File:DpAAmw Page 11 DELAY /LOS WORKSHEET WITH INITIAL QUEUE Initial Dur. Uniform Delay Appr/ Unmet Unmet Lane Demand Demand Unadj. Adj. Group Q veh t hrs. ds di sec Initial Final Initial Lane Queue Unmet Queue Group Param. Demand Delay Delay u Q veh d3 sec d sec Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection Delay 6.3 LaneGroup Init Queue Flow Rate So No.Lanes 0 "SL LnCapacity Flow Ratio v/c Ratio Grn Ratio I Factor AT or PVG Pltn Ratio PF2 Q1 kB Q2 Q Average Q Spacing Q Storage Q S Ratio 70th Percentile Output: fB% 1.2 1.2 BOQ 0.5 0.3 QSRatio 85th Percentile Output: Eastbound LT R 0.0 0.0 14 10 1900 1900 1 1 1322 1473 132 147 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.07 0.10 0.10 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.3 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 sec /veh Intersection LOS A BACK OF QUEUE WORKSHEET Westbound LTR 0.0 42 1900 1 0 1355 136 0.03 0.31 0.10 1.000 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.1 0.2 0.1 1.2 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.4 Northbound L TR 0.0 0.0 14 298 1900 1900 1 2 0 1703 1697 85 1239 0.01 0.18 0.16 0.24 0.82 0.73 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 2.7 0.9 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.5 3.0 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 0.7 3.5 Southbound L TR 0.0 0.0 6 416 1900 1900 1 2 0 1703 1700 85 1241 0.00 0.24 0.06 0.34 0.82 0.73 1.000 3 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.2 4.1 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.2 4.6 24.9 24.9 24.9 0 0 0 1.2 1.2 0.3 5.4 HCS- Signals 4.1 File:Dp86emw Page 12 B% BOQ QSRatio 1.6 1.6 1 0.6 0.4 90th Percentile Output: fB% 1.8 1.8 BOQ 0.7 0.5 QSRatio 95th Percentile Output: fB% 2.1 2.1 BOQ 0.8 0.6 QSRatio 98th Percentile Output: fB% 2.7 2.7 BOQ 1.0 0.7 QSRatio 1.6 1.9 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.4 2.6 3.1 11.6 1.6 0.9 4.7 1.8 1.7 1.0 5.2 2.1 2.0 1.1 6.0 2.7 2.5 1.5 7.4 11.6 1.6 0.3 7.1 1.8 1.7 0.4 7.8 2.1 2.0 0.4 8.9 2.7 2.4 0.6 10.9 ERROR MESSAGES No errors to report. PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CHECKLIST WEST SIDE HANGAR IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT City of Tukwila Department of community Development Proponent King County International Airport P.O. Box 80245 Seattle, WA 98108 Cynthia Stewart, Airport Manger October 5, 2001 Point of Contact Warren C. Pugh, AIA, The Austin Company (206) 674 -8344 CITY of TIJI(WILA JAN 2 3 2002 PERMIT CENTER City of Ti ily ES_-4 Screening Checklist City of Tukwila Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: / 9 4tre 21 L RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWI)A JAN 2 3 2002 Applicant Name: //// {f4y 9 / 7C ,� f Street Address: 9ve. 54007‘ i / /Ad/ j/l11L < S City. State. Lip : &40, ) l0/9 12`,/e — 4/li7 Telephone: (&,6J PERMIT CENTER DIRECTIONS Tats Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your proles: to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon. or cutthroat trout as defined bv Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. Tne checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No.' questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on,Page 1, read each question carefully. circle '`Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these auestions, you may need to refer to site plans, grading and drainage plans, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. . anuur., = -.: 00! • CiP; of 17 ' -vita ESA Screening Checklist Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -0 Will the project require any form of 'grading? Grading is defined as an excavating, fiiiing, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which aiters the existing ,7round surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) Chapter 13.06, Zoning Code, Page 13 -1 1). Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 2-0 YES) Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page 3) 2 -4) Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation from a site (see Chapter 13.06, Page 13 -3). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 3 -0 YES - Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -4) Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a stream and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 13.06, Page 13-15). Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, -storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste. regardless of quantity, that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173-303 (see TMC Chapter 13.06. Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 13- 1 1). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. p• 6 Continue to Question 5 -4) , IS Continue to Question 5 -0 - �r /rte lrirrlr�5 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, i on, or interception of groundwater? Exampies of projects that may affect groundwater include. but are not limited to: construction of a new well. change in water withdrawals from an existing .veil, projects involving prolonged construction de'.vater ing, proiects installing French drains or interceptor trenches. and .:ewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis. projects that require a geotechnicai report pursuant to the requirements of TIC 13.45.060 and 13.45.O30E. 4. or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 13.45.080A. should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue co Question 6 -0 ■ ' r..S Continue to 0_uestion 6 -0 C 4 ///nd //I se&_.,e.,- 4S ., cmicr.r 25. 2001 1 Part A (continued) City of T ,vita ES,I Screening Checklist 6-i) Will the project involve landscaping or re-occurring outdoor ,-maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides or herbicides? This does not include the one -time use of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural vegetation such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arranged in a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chanter 13.06. Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 13- 1 3). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or ,eras. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete Checklist Complete i Part B: Please answer each question below for projects t at include grading. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank'? This includes any projects that will require grading on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1 -2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion andior sedimentation in watercourses. the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve Grading have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your - project involves 'trading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally exempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area. answer Yes to this uestion. Please circle appropriate response. -.)0(1. „�/��z' CSL%G Ad) 101!1 /11 ?4L //,',/24 Vh J,j NO - CContinue to Question 1 -3 • CUB° /� 4” 4 4/ �� j ' 9 11//tdl-e..) Continue to Question 1 1 /2,111 6/U "//7 //ZLLS 1 -3 Will the project result in :he construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development: or a hard surface. area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior :o development (see TMC Chapter 13.06. Tukwila Zoning Code. Page 13 -1=). Such areas include. but are not limited to. rooftops, asphalt or concrete paving, compacted surfaces. or other surfaces that similarly affect the•natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. fi►Ch3/L/i CSf/ . eron bJ t / NO - Continue to i uesticn 2 -J (Page _ l /11116240t//de(5 . / // YZS Continue to Question : - ' /2/.1 44a11..// vid a/T.3 ..anuar, :00; Part B (continued) City of Tz I ila ESA Screening Checklist 1 -4 Will your project generate stornwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stornv.vater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include :he design of a stC mwater management System scecitically designed to infiltrate stormwater. answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Pase 2) Pan C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the nest question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined 'ov TNIC 13.06.345 as any self - supporting w,voodv plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter- breast - height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2-3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question 2 -4 2 -4 Will the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Greer✓Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. .2ontinue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) Y ES - Continue to Question 2 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a v, tercourse or the GreevDuwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to O.Duestion 3 -0 ( Page 2) .lanua'',' --. =001 City a Tr[ila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinari high water mark of watercourses or the DuwamishiGreen or Black Rivers or in wetlands: Review each question carefully, considering 111 phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential erner?encv operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance.. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project invoive the direct aiteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse, the GreeniDuwamish rivers. or Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal :vetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and pemanent modifications. Please circle appropriate response. Continue'to Question 3-2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or .vetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis, "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses or any area that may provide off channel rearing. habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the GreeniDuwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a Liao gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. NO - Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and adults. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross-sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left yank. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-5 `t-ES - Continue to Question 3-5 3-5 Will the proiect require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the CreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis. debris includes, bur is not limited to fallen trees. ogs. shrubs. rocks, piles. rip -rap. submerged metal, and broken concrete or other building materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a %vatercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers as part of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to his question. Pease circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 .,cnuar: =f. 200! Part D (continued) Ciry of ESA Screening Checklist w 3 -6 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface connection to another watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that suuoort salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor :would be assessable to saimonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a "functions and values" rating for basefowi?r oundwater support of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3-7 YES - Continue to Question 3 -7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or ,wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salrnonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes :wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, articularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. CD- Continue to Question 4-0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) anu la r,.., 2001 • • A. BACKGROUND 1. Date checklist prepared: September 21, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Construction is proposed to commence in March 2002 and Complete in December 2002 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future additions or expansions of the_project.are , not.anticipated at this time. 4. Do you know; whether applications are pending for governmental" approvals of;: other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal ?'If yes,"; explain. None 5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: Federal Aviation Administration: • Approval of Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration — FAA Form 7460- 1 • Approval of Land Exchange between Museum of Flight and King County International Airport. State of Washington • Electrical permits King County: DDES approval for compliance with current K.C. Surface Water Manual City of Tukwila /Local: • State Environmental Policy Act Review /Approval • Construction Permits • Utilities Approvals 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This project will involve construction of 3 new one story light aircraft hangars and the relocation of one existing single story light aircraft hangar. Site surfaces adjacent to hangars will be graded and paved to accommodate light aircraft maneuvering and Environmental Checklist 1 • • parking. The project will provide for storage of 26 light aircraft inside the hangar buildings and 18 light aircraft outside parking /tie -down positions. 13 of the aircraft hangar positions replace hangar space being eliminated by the Museum of Flight Expansion Project. A separate project, but related action to this project involves the demolition of one existing 2 story brick and steel office building, approximately 10,000 SF. This demolition will be permitted separately. Total site area is 347,639 SF. The four hangar buildings are designated Hangar 1, Hangar 2, Hangar 3 and Hangar 4. The proposed Hangar No. 1 is a new, one story, type H N steel framed building. The 10,610 SF building will have hangar space for 7 private aircraft and approximately 1,000 SF of office space. Total building height is 18 feet. The proposed Hangar No. 2 is an existing one story, type II N steel framed building that will be moved from an existing location on King County International Airport property; directly north`otthe °M'aseum°of°Flight: The 1'5 ;340,SEbuilding. will' have hangar.,space for 8 private aircraft. Total building height is 18 feet.:. The existing . „, building will.be modified structurally to accommodate current buiiding'codes.. s° The:proposed:HangarNO,.( at,isz,newi,i,onestbry;_type; ItMsteel ftarriecituildihg. The'' 22,450 SF building will have hangar space for 6 private aircraft and 6 — 180 SF offices with toilet rooms..Total building height is 23 feet. The proposed Hangar No. 4 is a new, one story, type II N steel framed building. The 13,500 SF building will have hangar space for 5 private aircraft and 5 — 180 SF offices with toilet rooms. Total building height is 19' feet. 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila on the east side of East Marginal Way South, from S 86th Place to S. 87th Place and is part of King County International Airport. The site is located in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East. Exhibit A, Location in Region; Exhibit B, Vicinity Map; Exhibit C, Site Plan; The Legal Description for the two parcels affected is attached as Exhibit D 8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive? No Environmental Checklist 2 B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck) ?. If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to geotechnical report, Exhibit E. d:'' Are there surface indications' or history ofunstable soils in the''immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be graded and excavated as required for building foundations, utilities and installing new light aircraft taxilane and tie -down pavement Approximate fill and grading quantities are as follows: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and utilities will be approximately 25,000 cubic yards. Location of disposal site will be determined by the construction contractor. Approximately 3,600 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 5,000 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre- approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Precipitation and surface runoff may cause erosion during grading and construction. At project completion, erosion impacts are not anticipated, as the site will be fully built out including landscaping. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Environmental Checklist 3 • s The 347,639 SF site is currently 100% covered by buildings and impervious, paved surfaces. Approximately 24,000 SF of new landscaping will be installed leaving approximately 93% of the site covered with impervious surfaces after project completion h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Some or all of the following standards methods of mitigation will be used, as appropriate: 1) Silt fencing will be placed around the perimeter of large open excavations. 2) Filter fabric will be laid between the frame and grate of all catch basins and manholes that may be subject to silt laden runoff. The filter fabric physical condition will be inspected at regular intervals, such as daily and,after all rain events, to ensure it is properly furictioning: 3) Straw bales will be installed around catch basin grates or in drainage paths when:: silt laden runoff conditions become too heavy for the filter fabric and silt fencing , methodsAisted.above: c. 4) Asphalt and concrete surfaces will be swept daily during extensive grading operations to minimize silt laden storm water runoff potential. 5) Excavated soil stockpiles will be stored in Tined containment areas so that storm water runoff within the containment area can be monitored prior to discharge. Additionally, the soil stockpiles will be fully covered to minimize its contact with rainfall. 6) Disturbed areas that are exposed for over a week will be stabilized and covered with straw or plastic sheeting to minimize contact with rainfall. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will be released. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No Environmental Checklist 4 • • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained, and wetting the site as required to reduce fugitive dust emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater; lakes, ponds, wetlands) ? =' If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream'or river it flows into. The- projectsite. ie approxiMately 1500cifeet:West of the Duwamish Waterway: 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No 6) . Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Environmental Checklist 5 No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including storm-water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection•and.disposaljf zany-.( includequantities ,..if.,known.).;. Where,wiII...., this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters. ?... 'If. so, describe. .; Existing: Source.of site runoff would. be.rainfall. from asphalt .area for ,an..abandoned. automotive parking - urea:• Coffectionris by catch `basin'.and'cbnveyed'through a' pipe storm sewer system. System conveys water to a sump, where it is joined by waters from other areas of the airport, and these waters are lifted, by pumps, to a 48" diameter conveyance pipe. This pipe conveys the water as well as runoff from the adjacent street and industrial properties to the west, a distance of about 1500 feet where it outfalls to the Duwamish River. Proposed: Source of runoff would be from asphalt for aircraft taxilanes and tie -down areas and from associated roofs for aircraft hangars. Runoff will be collected by catch basin and conveyed though a storm sewer, treated through a stormwater quality facility and then will discharge to a sump. Here the water is joined by other stormwater from the airport, and conveyed through a lift station to 2 -36" diameter pipes for a distance of about 400', where it joins the existing 48" storm sewer. The discharge from the lift station appears to have the operating capacity of up to 60 cfs and an override capacity of 90 cfs. The stormwater treatment facility has been designed in accordance with the requirements of the 1998 K.C. Surface Water Manual. The facilities have provisions for spill containment, oil control, pre- treatment and treatment. See the attached Technical Information Report (T.I.R.) for complete description. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials will not be able to enter surface waters provided the water quality measures proposed are inspected and maintained on a regular basis, and kept in operating condition . Environmental Checklist 6 • • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Due to the discharge to a large body of water directly tying into Puget Sound, stormwater runoff is not being detained. Proposed water quality facilities, such as coallesing plate oil /water separators, compost filters and Stormceptors will provide mechanical means to reduce sediment and minimize the presence of oil and other pollutants. Facilities with any potential to discharge large amounts of emissions that are damaging to the environment, such as deicing facilities and floor drains, are being routed to sanitary sewer facilities. Washing of all aircraft within the project limits will be restricted to a "wash -pad" with•a direct• connection°to°the°locaI sanitary `sewer: ,This wilhensure all,run- off ., from the washing of the aircraft is not directed to the stbrmwater.drains . An, R . oil /water separator will be installed on the drain line to minimize the amount of entering the sanitary sewer. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs, grass, pasture, crop of grain, Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, Other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil other types Of vegetation None b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? None c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Completed project will have limited decorative landscaping. Bldg. HG. E. Marginal Way 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Environmental Checklist 7 • • Birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are listed below: Birds: seagulls, crows Mammals: none observed Fish: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Utilize temporary erosion, long term storm water and hazardous materials control systems and best management practices to prevent contaminated discharges ihto':the,~ Duwamish Waterway. , 6. Energy and Natural Resources 0 a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The design will be in compliance with the energy codes and minimize the wasteful use of energy. Hangar 1 and H angar 2 are unheated which will minimize energy consumption. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: Usual oils, greases, fuel and solvents will be present during construction. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: Environmental Checklist 8 1 • No special emergency services will be required. The hazardous materials involved are commonly used at other locations at the airport and are reasonably expected to be within the capability of existing emergency service operations. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: No b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? None --• -- 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the :'F: project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation ,other)? lndicatemhat.hours, nois a;would,come.•from,the,site: . Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels which range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. The project will add capacity to store 31 additional private light aircraft at King County International Airport. These aircraft would utilize existing runway and taxiway systems for take -off and landing. Increase in noise from these activities will be negligible. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. The site is not near residential uses. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The site is currently used for office building and parking lot for offsite aircraft manufacturing facility. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No c. Describe any structures on the site. Existing two -story office building exists on site, which will be demolished. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. A 10,000 sf two -story steel and concrete building with brick exterior and two one - story steel covered sheds will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Environmental Checklist 9 1 • MIC /H f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MIC /H g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project ?. ", Fourteen .,4.14) one person ,shall,.office.spaces, are . located in Hangar;3;and.,Hangar;41, . which would be occupied part time. An additional1000"SF "office space.isprovided in Hangar 1 which would house approximately 5 people. Hangar spaces and paved aircraft parking areas accommodate 44 aircraft, which are occupied part time by tenants and guests performing maintenance, preparing to depart, etc. j• Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist 10 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Tallest building is 23 feet high. Principal exterior building materials are painted metal wall panels b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: N.one.......... 11. Light and glare a...: What.ty,pe; of light,orglare with the, proposal produce. ? <,What.time. of. day would.it . mainly occur? Light and glare impacts are not anticipated. b. Could Tight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if any? None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? None b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None Environmental Checklist 11 • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. No b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or` next ' -to the'site: None have been identified on the project site. c: {. Proposedtrheasures aoireducetor:control' impactsy if any:, Although previous excavations have disclosed no indications of archeological significance, if artifacts are uncovered, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. This portion of King County Airport is served by East Marginal Way South and entranced through signalized intersections at S. 87th Place and S. 86th Place. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop: Yes c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Completed project would have 20 stalls for vehicles. In addition, tenants typically park their vehicles inside their hangar when aircraft is being flown. This project would eliminate approximately 400 parking stalls, which have been rendered obsolete by the demolition of the existing building and the significant reduction of the Boeing workforce at the plant on the west side of East Marginal Way. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Environmental Checklist 12 • This project would reduce the width of the road access to the site at the S. 86th Place intersection. See Exhibit E. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Project will use King County International Airport for aircraft take -off and landing. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes would occur. Approximately 25 to 50 trips per day would be generated, split equally between S 86th Place and S. 87th Place intersections. The peak hours /days would occur on weekends and holidays and would be spread out throughout the day. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,,if any; Project reduces number of vehicles parked on site by approximately 400 vehicles; and, also, reduces:sign.ificantly, peak hour:traffc..since,these 400,:vehicles. served, employee vehicles operated during peak traffic periods. g. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. Site is served by King County International Airport Police. Tukwila fire department provides building structure fire suppression emergency response and King County International Airport Fire Department provides aircraft fire suppression emergency response. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, domestic water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer and storm sewerage are currently available with sufficient capacity to accommodate the requirements of this proposal. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Needed utility distribution systems for the project are already in place. Utility Purveyor Environmental Checklist 13 1 • Water Tukwila Electricity Seattle City Light Natural Gas Washington Natural Gas Telephone Qwest Sewer Tukwila Environmental Checklist 14 1 • C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. ing County lnte Date Submitted: @ 4II tCy /e% Exhibits-- Location in Region .A Vicinity Map B Site- Plan:.::.._ Legal Description D S. 86th Place Intersection diagram E Geotechnical Report F ational Airport Manager Environmental Checklist 15 Puget Sound • • EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP Lake Washington Harbor Island Seattle West 1 -. Seattle Georgetown King County International Airport Mercer Island South Park White Center Burien Skyway Tukwila SeaTac H:15709tl1- KCIA -T HengerlgltemplEXHIBITS.dwg, 09110&2001 1251:00 PM, tgt Renton t • a EXITeo't, 161 46. • • N • •. \ • . • • • <.�'••• • OPPORTUNITY.:. SKYWAY.' • • EXHIBIT B VICINITY MAP - ,Terminal Campus •\ • \.�Cr a. • k. 1i • i • • • f • :j • SITE LOCATION. • ,a • • BOEING :,ACCESS RO D EXIT '1` 158 • Access Gate Parking 24 Cars PMS�- \ \ Fence �a' O' Edge of New Pavement S leV P�S�- East Marginal Way a i i \ I d,ce ,p,w 322' -0" o in Fir EL. = +15.75' 300' -2" Hangar "3' 60' -0" '•• 1 5ist Pump I I P 11:75'. Hangar „4„. fc fo _____i j --------- - - - - -- -Edge of Ne Taxiway OFA Property Line typical Centerline of West Taxiway B Building Information Hangar Condition Description Area & Height No. 1 New Building 7 position "T" Hangar 10,610 SF - 18' high No. 2 Relocated Building 8 position 'T" Hangar 15,340 SF - 18' high No. 3 New Building 6 position Ex Hangar 22,450 SF - 23' high No. 4 New Building 5 position Ex Hangar 13,500 SF - 19' high SEPA Support Document 9/21/01. Nlew Taxiwa Access sec io cut King County International Airport Lots 13 -14 T Hangar Improvements Tukwila, Washington Site Plan THE AUSTIN COMPANY co,SUUMITS • DESIGNERS • ENGINEERS • CONSTRUCTORS Exhibit C • • EXHIBIT D Legal Description Lot 14 THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY NTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 11 (1965), 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS MONUMENT "D" AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND' GEODETIC SURVEY.' COORDINATE OF X = 1,637,871.14. Y = 195,351.46; THENCE'SOUTH' 72 °48' 11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO A PONT 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY' OF,,MEAS.URED,AT RIGHT.AN.GLES.TO, THEt:CEN.L'1✓RLINE,.OF'THE'i MAIN RUNWAY OF' SAID •AIRPORT AND THE TRUFPOINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 488.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °17'55" WEST '77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 61.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61°17'55" EAST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 146.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 60 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN ACCESS TAXIWAY A DISTANCE OF 375.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 257.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY Iv1ARGN, 149.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 259.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 149.00 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 590.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID MARGIN 262.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 381.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 °06'55" EAST 40.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 309,048 SQUARE FEET, ±7.095 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO A 10 FOOT EASEMENT FOR SEWER, SAID EASEMENT BEING PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND LYING EASTERLY AND ADJACENT THERETO. EXHIBIT D Legal Description Bldg 14 -06 A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID PONT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE..SOUTHLINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LANiD CLAIM NO, 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF "SAID EAST WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF,:;, BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERIXNARGIN MITI LTHE SHORE:LINE;.OF. TIiDEV.UW, AMISH:,RNER ;. AS'' ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66 °18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. - EXHIBIT E Proposed South 86th PL. Intersection Modifications • • • ' • 1 i!= ;C. - , • 1 A ! 1 1. • . j " f •? • • ■ . '1. N 22`,71'f" (MCNUUEN LAE; : 1 ' ' • --r I-I , -.:. .! ',' ..•• • ' t _RASTG4_-_4- / / 43-1 h•cl •" • 12.;7, .241114164., •:(n. EigliConsulting argineers 201 771lni Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Wasrurcrcn 98101 (206) 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-3130 RCA LOTS 13 PROPOSE,0 S . TH PL. FROJ. 1011S3 Mit ci • 18.C1 • EXHIBIT F Geotechnical Investigation To be attached •EoL_003 COMPLETE. APPLICATION CHECKLIST., The materials listed below must be submitted with your application unless specifically waived in writing by the Department of Community Development. Please contact the Department if you feel that certain items are not applicable to your project and should be waived. Application review will not 'begin until it is determined to be complete. There is no filing fee. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS MAY BE REQUIRED. Department staff are available to answer questions about application materials at 206-43-1-Z670. Irk 1,� COMPLETE APPLICATION CHECKLIST TABLE JAN 2 3 2602 Information required: May he waived in unusual. • cases, upon approval of the.Planning Division. Information' f Waned Ping Div. pv u Office Use Only Comments & Conditions. , 1. One (1) copy of the Complete Application Checklist, indicating items submitted with application. 7 2. Four (4) sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action. ✓ 3. One (1) set of plans reduced to 8,5 "x11 "(High Quality Photo Reduction) 4. Four (4) copies of supporting studies. t tk yIrdiQuA W Cvo A.vaiy6 V . s-c - 3 eci s -L 12rCw -e�, — G: APPHANILANDUSE.APPlsplan.doc, 06/13/00 CITOOF TUKWILA SEPA Department of Community Development �T�T 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, W4 98188 PLANNED r ED Telephone: (206) 131- 36i0 FAX (206) X31 -36 `OF.TVE ACTION E -mail: tukplan cr ci.tulctivila.wa.us NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (0 /. iied r l/!1�J//ye�,0 3 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TA.YLOT _NU:I,IBERS. t5 ,4, d -49djy q- 9D /9 -09 j ODD!/oD - yr etee%S/o - eVc39 -D y 201 -,/Dq - o t c.0 - oot 3 3 ztt oil - q o t l Quarter: S l �� 33 Township: i 7 Ao Range: y /o (This information may be found on your tax statement.) .el/ y DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: SYpa.Coo - o (2,4i ow-c e .a.4.4 . Cut- • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: l khc...Cllr /D/% Address: Phone: FAX:(,2 bZU 7 /DL Date: /e N/1/, d.2 G: tIPPNAiVIL .-IjVDUSE..-IPP!spian.doc. 06/13/00 3 FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT 002.., Planner: File Number: - Application Complete: (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete: (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (0 /. iied r l/!1�J//ye�,0 3 LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TA.YLOT _NU:I,IBERS. t5 ,4, d -49djy q- 9D /9 -09 j ODD!/oD - yr etee%S/o - eVc39 -D y 201 -,/Dq - o t c.0 - oot 3 3 ztt oil - q o t l Quarter: S l �� 33 Township: i 7 Ao Range: y /o (This information may be found on your tax statement.) .el/ y DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: SYpa.Coo - o (2,4i ow-c e .a.4.4 . Cut- • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: l khc...Cllr /D/% Address: Phone: FAX:(,2 bZU 7 /DL Date: /e N/1/, d.2 G: tIPPNAiVIL .-IjVDUSE..-IPP!spian.doc. 06/13/00 3 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Shannon & Wilson, Inc. completed a hazardous building materials survey of Boeing Building 14 -06 (Building 14 -06) located at 8700 East Marginal Way and Hangars A and B on the property adjacent to the current Museum of Flight property. This work was performed in anticipation of demolition of the site buildings. This hazardous materials survey consisted of an asbestos survey, lead -based paint survey, and an inventory of fluorescent light fixtures with polychlorinated biphenyls- (PCB -) containing ballasts. The asbestos survey was conducted to comply with the asbestos good -faith survey requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 -62 -077 and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) Regulation III, Article 4, prior to demolition activities. This report includes a description of the suspect materials in each building that were analyzed for asbestos and lead during this survey and a summary of the materials found to contain asbestos or lead. Estimates of the quantity of asbestos - containing materials (ACM) identified in each building are provided in Tables 1 and 2. Materials identified as positive for asbestos in Building 14 -06 include: joint compound, cement siding, tar patch on roofing vents, and built -up roofing materials. The only material identified as positive for asbestos in Hangar A was mastic beneath vinyl floor tiles. No materials were identified as positive for asbestos in Hangar B. Samples were not collected from fire doors located within the buildings. These doors should be assumed to contain asbestos. Lead- containing and lead -based paint were detected in each building in a variety of paints and locations. PCB - containing fluorescent light ballasts were identified in Building 14 -06, but not in Hangars A or-13. However, some fluorescent lights in the hangars were inaccessible due to their height above the floor. Due to their apparent age the inaccessible light fixtures are expected to have PCB - containing ballasts. 21 -1- 09383- 009- R1/WP /LKD 1 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ACRONYMS iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 1 2.1 Asbestos Survey Methods 1 2.2 Sampling Guidelines 2 2.3 Procedures and Analytical Methods 2 2.4 Historical Records Review And Former Surveys 3 2.5 Asbestos Survey 3 2.6 Survey Results 3 2.6.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 3 2.6.2 Hangar A 4 2.6.3 Hangar B 5 3.0 LEAD -BASED PAINT SURVEY 5 3.1 Building 14 -06 5 3.2 Hangars A and B 5 4.0 PCB - CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS INVENTORIES 6 4.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 6 4.2 Hangar A 6 4.3 Hangar B 6 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 5.1 Asbestos - Containing Materials 7 5.2 Lead -Based Paint 8 5.3 PCB - Containing Light Ballasts 9 6.0 LIMITATIONS 9 2 1 -1 -093 8 3 -009 -R 1 / W P/L KD 11 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) LIST OF TABLES Table No. SHANNON FiWILSON, INC. 1 Building 14 -06, Analytical Results of Asbestos Samples 2 Hangars A and B, Analytical Results of Asbestos Samples 3 Building 14 -06, Analytical Results of Lead -Based Paint Samples 4 Hangars A and B, Analytical Results' of Lead -Based Paint Samples LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Building 14 -06 1st Floor 3 Building 14 -06 2nd Floor 4 Building 14 -06 Roof 5 Hangar A 6 Hangar B LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) Certificates B Laboratory Analytical Reports C Site Photographs D Important Information About Your Environmental Report 21-1 -09383-001-R1/WP/LKD 111 21 -1- 09383 -009 ACM AHERA ASHARA Building 14 -06 CAB CFR EPA HEPA HGA HUD HVAC LBP LCP L &I mg/L mg/m3 MOF NVL NVLAP OSHA PACM PCBs PEL PLM PSAPCA PSCAA TCLP TSI WAC WISHA SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. ACRONYMS asbestos - containing materials Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act Boeing Building 14 -06 cement asbestos board Code of Federal Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency high efficiency particulate air homogeneous area Department of Housing and Urban Development heating ventilation and air conditioning lead -based paint lead- containing paint Labor and Industry milligrams per liter milligrams per cubic meter Museum of Flight NVL Laboratories, Inc National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Occupational Safety and Health Administration potential asbestos - containing material polychlorinated biphenyls permissible exposure levels polarized light microscopy Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure thermal system insulation Washington Administrative Code Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration 21 -1 -09383 -009- R1/WP/LKD iv 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON fiWILSON, INC. HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Shannon & Wilson completed a hazardous building materials survey of Boeing Building 14 -06 (Building 14 -06) located at 8700 East Marginal Way and Hangars A and B located on the property adjacent to the current Museum of Flight (MOF) location in Seattle, Washington (Figure 1). This survey work was performed on October 22 through 24, 2001. The buildings included in this survey consist of one two -story brick office building with an attached corrugated steel covered storage area, and two corrugated steel hangars. The work was accomplished in accordance with the scope of work included in our proposal. 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 2.1 Asbestos Survey Methods The asbestos survey consisted of a visual inspection of the buildings for suspect asbestos - containing material (ACM), manipulation of suspect ACM to determine friability, and sample collection and analysis. The survey was conducted to comply with the asbestos good -faith inspection requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 -62 -077 prior to demolition or renovation activities. A certified building inspector conducted the sampling. A training certificate is included in Appendix A. The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation, 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 763, is the primary governing regulation for performing asbestos surveys. AHERA defines suspect ACM and specifies the minimum number of samples to be collected and analyzed. A total of 52 bulk asbestos samples were collected by Shannon & Wilson. The samples were submitted to NVL Laboratories, Inc. (NVL) and analyzed for asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 600/R- 93/116. PLM quantifies asbestos concentrations between 1 and 100 percent. AHERA specifies that materials containing greater than 1 percent asbestos must be considered as 21-1-09383-001 - R I / W P /LKD 1 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. ACM. The analytical laboratory reports, which provide detailed layered analysis, are included in Appendix B. Asbestos sampling locations are depicted in Figures 2 through 6. 2.2 Sampling Guidelines The survey was conducted in accordance with the federal, state, and local regulations, which require the building owner to identify and dispose of ACM that may be encountered during demolition work. These regulations segregate suspect ACM into three categories: ► Surfacing Materials: ACM that is sprayed or troweled on surfaces (walls, ceilings, and structural membranes) for acoustical, decorative, or fireproofing purposes. This includes plaster and fireproofing insulation. ► Thermal System Insulation (TSI): Insulation used to inhibit heat transfer or prevent condensation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other components of hot and cold water systems and heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. This includes pipe lagging; pipe wrap; block, batt, and blanket insulation; cements and "muds "; and a variety of other products. ► Miscellaneous Materials: Largely non - friable ACM products and materials not classified as surfacing materials or TSI. This includes floor tile, ceiling tile, roofing materials, and fabrics. 2.3 Procedures and Analytical Methods The AHERA regulation, 40 CFR Part 763, is the primary governing regulation for performing asbestos surveys. This regulation was originally enacted for school buildings, but has since been applied to public and commercial buildings by the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) in 1994, and in 1995 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker protection regulations, specifically 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) and in Washington, WAC 296 -62 -077. AHERA specifies the minimum number of samples to be collected and analyzed to prove that a suspect ACM is a non -ACM. AHERA specifies that only one positive analytical result necessitates designating a suspect material as ACM. All samples were submitted to NVL. NVL is accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP);of the U.S. Department of Commerce. This accreditation does not constitute endorsement, but rather a finding of laboratory competence. As stated previously, samples were analyzed for asbestos using PLM with dispersion staining by EPA Method 600/R- 93/116. 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP /LKD 2 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON iWILSON. INC. 2.4 Historical Records Review And Former Surveys Prior to performing the survey, information derived from a former asbestos survey report for Building 14 -06 was reviewed. The primary purpose of the review was to identify where ACM were likely to be present. Information pertaining to suspect and positive ACM locations within the building surveyed was obtained from a letter summarizing the results of a former asbestos survey report with the subject: Asbestos Goodfaith Survey for Building 14 -06 Job# G -1241 by Bill Whelan for Scott Darlington of Boeing Puget Sound Maintenance. Previous sample locations and the materials identified as positive for ACM during the former surveys, along with results of our visual inspection, are discussed below. 2.5 Asbestos Survey An inspection of the interiors and roofs of each of the buildings was completed to identify suspect ACM. A total of 34, 17, and 1 bulk samples were collected from Building 14 -06, Hangar A, and Hangar B, respectively. A total of 52 samples were analyzed for asbestos by PLM with dispersion staining. The laboratory analytical reports, which provide detailed layering analysis, are included as Appendix B. 2.6 Survey Results The results of the survey are discussed below. Tables 1 and 2 provide a summary of the suspect materials sampled in Building 14 -06 and Hangars A and B, respectively, along with the sample numbers, and analytical results. Figures 2 through 6 provide layouts of the surveyed buildings along with suspect ACM sample locations. These figures are color -coded to indicate where ACM was identified; the red numbers represent positive ACM locations while the green numbers represent non - detect ACM sample locations. These numbers, along with the corresponding figure numbers, are referenced in column 2 of the tables. Some locations indicated on the figures had more than one sample due to the existence of multiple layers of potential asbestos - containing material (PACM). 2.6.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 Building 14 -06 is a 16,000 - square -foot, brick, two -story building with an attached corrugated steel storage area. The building is currently vacant. The roof has flat and curved sections and is constructed of wood framing, wood decking, and asphalt. 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 3 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. Information from the letter describing the previous survey for this identified three ACM: cement asbestos board (CAB) shingles, caulking on ducting, and roofing materials, but did not include sampling locations or laboratory results indicating an asbestos percentage for those materials. Therefore, all PACM were re- sampled. Materials sampled during the current survey included covebase and associated mastic, acoustic ceiling tiles and associated mastic, sheet vinyl, faux wall partitions, formica counter -top, cement siding, tar patch (caulking), window putty, carpet mastic, vinyl floor tiles, wallboard and joint compound, sink insulation, and roofing materials. A total of 34 samples were collected from these materials in Building 14 -06. Of the samples analyzed, the following materials were found to be positive for ACM: cement siding on the roof with 35 percent chrysotile asbestos, and joint compound with 2 percent chrysotile asbestos. However, the wall system taken as a whole (wallboard and joint compound) contained less than 1 percent asbestos. Sample locations are shown on Figures 2 through 4, with the positive ACM locations designated in red. A summary of the materials sampled, the sample numbers, descriptions, results, and estimated amounts of confirmed ACM are presented in Table 1. 2.6.2 Hangar A Hangar A is a 18,000- square -foot, corrugated metal building partitioned into five 3,600 square -foot hangars. Each hangar has a 230 - square -foot office space and restroom. The building is currently occupied and used as airplane storage for a variety of businesses. The roof of Hangar A was inaccessible, but appears to be angled and constructed of corrugated metal. ACM may be present on the roof in sealants, gaskets, or tar patch around roof vents. These materials may be located- between sheets of corrugated metal and may not be encountered until demolition. These materials typically contain asbestos and should be sampled if encountered. Materials sampled included covebase and associated mastic, carpet mastic, wallboard and joint compound, and vinyl floor tiles. A total of 17 samples were collected from these materials in Hangar A. Of the samples analyzed, the only material found to be positive for ACM was vinyl floor . tile mastic with 3 percent chrysotile asbestos: Sample locations are shown on Figure 6, with the positive ACM locations designated in red. A summary of the materials sampled, the sample numbers, descriptions, results, and estimated amounts of confirmed ACM are presented in Table 2. 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 4 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON jWLSON. INC. 2.6.3 Hangar B Hangar B is a 18,000- square -foot, corrugated metal building partitioned into six 1,500- square -foot and two 1,050- square -foot hangars. The building is currently occupied and used as airplane storage for a variety of businesses. The roof of Hangar B was inaccessible, but appears to be angled and constructed of corrugated metal. ACM may be present on the roof in sealants, gaskets, or tar patch around roof vents. These materials may be located between sheets of corrugated metal and may not be encountered until demolition. These materials typically contain asbestos and should be sampled if encountered. The only PACM observed was caulking along the exterior walls. One sample was collected from this material in Hangar B. The material sampled was not found to contain asbestos. 3.0 LEAD -BASED PAINT SURVEY Painted surfaces were surveyed in order to identify areas of homogeneous color, texture, and apparent age. One or more paint chip samples were collected from each homogeneous area (HGA) for testing. Samples were collected by scraping off a small paint chip (approximately 1 square inch) down to substrate with a sharp chisel. During the survey, a total of 20 paint chip samples were collected from Building 14 -06 and Hangars A and B. Each sample was analyzed for lead by EPA method 7420. Paint sample locations are shown in Figures 2 through 6. Analytical testing was performed by NVL. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The complete analytical laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. 3.1 Building 14 -06 Thirteen paint chip samples were collected in Building 14 -06. Lead was found at concentrations exceeding the method detection limit in seven samples taken from the building (Table 3). The concentration of lead in the samples ranged from 0.01 to 0.31 percent. 3.2 Hangars A and B Hangars A and B are of similar construction materials and are treated here as a single building. Seven paint chip samples were collected in Hangars A and B. Lead was found at concentrations exceeding the method detection limit in three samples taken from the buildings (Table 4). The concentration of lead in the samples ranged from 0.92 to 1.5 percent. 21-1 - 093 83 - 001- R I / W 13/L KD 5 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. 4.0 PCB - CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS INVENTORIES As part of the hazardous building materials survey, fluorescent light fixtures were counted in each of the buildings. Most of the light fixtures were 4 feet long with four tubes per fixture. Others were 2 feet long and contained one or two tubes. Typically, each fixture has one ballast for each tube in a single tube fixture, or each pair of tubes in a multiple -tube fixture. 4.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 The approximate total number of fluorescent light fixtures in Building 14 -06 is 243 fixtures containing 774 light bulbs and 318 ballasts. The total number of ballasts is approximate since some fixtures were inaccessible. Many of the light fixtures were in operation and could not be safely dismantled to check the ballasts. Thus, only one fixture per room, approximately 20 percent of all the ballasts, were visually inspected to determine if they were labeled to indicate that they contain no PCBs. Fluorescent light ballasts manufactured before the late 1970s typically contain PCBs, and those manufactured after that time are usually labeled with "no PCBs." Of the 45 light fixtures inspected, only one was labeled "no PCBs." Based on the age of the buildings and the uniformity of the light fixtures encountered, it is expected that 312 ballasts contain PCBs. 4.2 Hangar A There are approximately 60 fluorescent light fixtures in Hangar A containing 240 light bulbs and 120 ballasts. The total number of ballasts is approximate since 10 of the 12 fixtures per hangar were inaccessible. Thus, only about 10 percent of all the ballasts were visually inspected to determine what they were labeled to indicate that they contain no PCBs. Of the light fixtures inspected, all were labeled "no PCBs." However, most of the inaccessible light fixtures appeared to be of an older style than those examined in the office portions of the hangars. The apparent age and size of bulb in the inaccessible fixtures indicates that they probably have PCB - containing ballasts. Thus, it is expected that 100 ballasts contain PCBs. 4:3 Hangar B There are approximately 34 fluorescent light fixtures in Hangar B containing 104 light bulbs and 68 ballasts. All of the fixtures in Hangar B were inaccessible. 21-1-09383-001 -R 1 / W P/LKD 6 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. However, based upon the size of tubes and style of fixtures, it is expected that the ballasts contain PCBs. Thus, it is expected that 68 ballasts contain PCBs. 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Asbestos - Containing Materials ACM is present in joint compound, tar patch on roof ducts, CAB siding, and built -up roofing materials in Building 14 -06, and flooring mastic in the office sections of Hangar A. No ACM was detected in Hangar B. We recommend that the tar patch, CAB siding, built -up roofing, and flooring mastic be removed prior to the demolition of the buildings in accordance with all local, state, and federal regulations. In addition, notification to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industry (L &I) and the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) is required prior to asbestos abatement. Materials that could not be sampled due to inaccessibility, structural barriers, or personnel safety reasons should be inspected during demolition. If suspect ACM is present, samples should be collected for laboratory analysis to confirm asbestos content prior to removal. This may result in cost savings if the materials are not asbestos containing. Fire doors were not inspected during this survey and should be assumed to contain asbestos. Since the wall system in Building 14 -06 (wallboard and joint compound) contains less than 1 percent asbestos as a composite, Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration (WISHA) Regional Directive 23.30 states that work involving the handling of the dry wall is not considered an asbestos project as defined in WAC 296 -65 -003. Under this provision, notification to the Washington Department of L &I and PSCAA is not required for projects involving only the drywall assuming certain requirements are met. These requirements include the use of wet, non - aggressive methods, prompt clean -up, and the use of high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtered vacuums, as well as asbestos awareness and hands -on training as prescribed in WAC 296 -62- 07722(5) for workers, and supervision by a competent person as defined in WAC 296 -62- 07703. Respiratory protection may also be required based on overall dust levels. All building maintenance personnel, contractors, and any other person who may disturb the ACM should be notified of the contents of this report and trained in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 prior to disturbing the ACM. 21 -1- 09383 - 001- R1/WP/LKD 7 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON FiWILSON, INC. 5.2 Lead -Based Paint Lead- containing paint (LCP) was detected throughout the interior of Building 14 -06, while LCP and lead -based paint (LBP) were detected throughout Hangars A and B. LBP is defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the LBP Poisoning Act to be paint containing greater than 0.5 percent lead. Renovation or demolition of materials containing lead presents concerns regarding both worker safety and health, and the regulatory status of any building materials requiring disposal. The mere presence of LCP can itself raise concerns under certain circumstances as specific businesses, such as child care facilities, are subject to strenuous lead - containing paint standards. According to OSHA guidelines, if lead is detected, it is present and must be handled in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. No simple relationship exists between the concentration of lead in paint and potential worker exposure if lead becomes airborne. Therefore, if lead is present and is disturbed during renovation or demolition activities, an evaluation must be made whether or not workers are exposed to concentrations in air in excess of the action level of 0.03 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). If the action level is exceeded, requirements for training, medical monitoring, and air sampling are triggered. If the permissible exposure levels (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 is exceeded, more requirements must be met, including use of respiratory protection equipment. Additional information pertaining to worker safety and health is available in WAC 296- 155 -176, WAC 296 -62, Part E — Respiratory Protection, and WAC 296 -62, Part H — Air Contaminants. OSHA guidelines are presented in 29 CFR 1926.62. If building materials containing lead are to be removed and disposed of, requirements for disposal must be met. Specifically, the dangerous waste criteria for lead is 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) measured by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). If treated as a separate waste, it is possible that materials containing high concentrations of LBP would exceed the dangerous waste criteria. , However, when these materials are combined with other building debris that does not contain significant amounts of lead in the overall waste stream, it is likely that the combined waste stream would not fail the TCLP criteria and would not require designation as a dangerous waste. Requirements for proper disposal of waste building materials (including sampling and testing) are specified in WAC 173 -303 and 40 CFR 261. 21-1-09383-001-R1 /WP/LICD 8 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. 5.3 PCB - Containing Light Ballasts We recommend that the asbestos abatement contractor be tasked to remove fluorescent light ballasts presumed to contain PCBs. During removal activities, each ballast can be inspected for PCBs and properly disposed. These materials require special handling practices for which the abatement contractor should be equipped. 6.0 LIMITATIONS A good -faith effort has been made to identify ACM in or on the buildings prior to demolition. Shannon & Wilson performed destructive sampling where feasible and within its limitation as a consultant. Construction methods and materials use varies with contractors and construction trades, and suspect ACM may exist in non - typical locations that we have not investigated. During the demolition process, care should be taken that additional suspect materials, if present, are not disturbed without following the appropriate regulatory requirements. Where suspect materials are encountered, they should be assumed to be ACM until shown to be negative for asbestos through laboratory analysis. If laboratory analysis is not performed, all suspect materials should be assumed to contain ACM. Shannon & Wilson performed this sampling consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in the industry. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Seneca Group and its representatives. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and on our experience and judgment. Shannon & Wilson cannot be held responsible for the interpretation by others of the data contained in this report. The information presented in Appendix E, "Important Information About Your Environmental Report," is provided to assist in understanding the use and limitations of our reports. SHANNON & WILSON, INC. son En Engineer Scott W aulke .E. Cody M. min g , AHERA Building Inspector Associate Certificate #997048 AHERA Building Inspector Certificate #999640 AHERA Project Designer Certificate #999712 CMJ:SWG /cmj 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 9 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ASBESTOS SAMPLES BUILDING 14 -06 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Sample Identification Figure.- `Sample t { a Sample Description *. N j r Resul t Asbestos Content ,. (percent) , Friable? 'S Estimated Q t DW01 - 01 2 -1 Wall System Wallboard Joint Compound " Negative Negative Positive < 1 ND 2% Yes 31,600 SF CB01 - 01 2 - 2 White covebase and mastic Negative CT01 - 01 2 - 3 2' x 4' off-white wormhole ceiling tile Negative CT02 - 01 2 - 4 2' x 4' white wormhole ceiling tile Negative CT03 - 01 2 - 5 2' x 4' white larger wormhole ceiling tile Negative SV01 - 01 2 - 6 White with speckles sheet vinyl Negative DW02 - 01 2 - 7 Partition wall / drywall Negative MAS01 - 01 2 - 8 Carpet Mastic Negative CB01 - 02 2 - 9 White covebase and mastic Negative MAS01 - 02 2 - 10 Carpet mastic Negative FOR01 - 01 2 - 11 Formica Countertop Negative DW01 - 03 2 - 12 Drywall Negative CT04 - 01 2 - 13 Glue -on ceiling tile Negative MAS01 - 03 2 - 14 Carpet mastic Negative DW01 - 04 2 -15 Wall System Wallboard Joint Compound Negative Negative Positive < 1 ND 2% Yes 31,600 SF DW01 - 05 2 - 16 Drywall Negative VFT01 - 01 2 - 17 12" x 12" beige vinyl floor tile Negative CB01 - 03 2 - 18 White covebase and mastic Negative MAS01 - 04 2 - 19 Carpet mastic Negative WP01 - 01 2 - 20 Window putty on western external windows Negative TB01 - 01 2 - 21 Tack board Negative CB02 - 01 3 - 1 Off -white covebase and mastic Negative 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ASBESTOS SAMPLES BUILDING 14 -06 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Sampled Identification '.Figurer# Sample # ;� r :.� :; +• Sample Description ' :. . .. - >° Analytical` Result Asbestos Content' (percent) ' '` •.;, .Friable? :'Est- imat ed Quantity DW01 - 06 3 - 2 Drywall Negative CT02 - 02 3 - 3 2' x 4' white wormhole ceiling tile Negative MAS01 - 05 3 - 4 Carpet Mastic Negative DW01 - 02 3 - 5 Drywall Negative DW01 - 07 3 - 6 Drywall Negative RM01 - 01 4 -1 Upper layer of roofing material Positive per previous survey Unknown No 15,600 SF RM02 - 01 4 -1 Bottom layer of roofing material Positive per previous survey Unknown No 15,600 SF CAB01 - 01 4 -- 2 Siding on roof Positive 35% No 500 SF TRP01 - 01 4 - 2 Tar paper under siding Negative CLK01 - 01 4 - 3 Seam caulk on walls Negative TP01 - 01 4 - 4 Tar patch on venting Positive per previous survey Unknown No 100 SF TP02 - 01 4 - 5 Tar patch around roof seams Negative Notes: ND = Non - detect LF = Linear feet SF = Square feet 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ASBESTOS SAMPLES HANGARS A AND B SHANNON & WILSON INC. ..---:'...-..:e!:-ect,i6,,: SaniPleideritifiCipon i;-,'. ,,...,, .;, . Sample'# . .... -:,-,...:-.2----.-..-'t-,.,.-;--.... :. Sam Ple Description:, :-,! .;:: %. • ..:....-:. :2,--- ..Ai6eitOsC.Ontent ;Analytical Result - _ (percent) :. ' —0- .--., 4'7 ::T. Z:'. - Friable? ,Eitiniated.".. ... Quantity A - CB01 - 01 5 - 1 Gray covebase and mastic A - CB02 - 01 5 - 2 Beige covebase and mastic A - DWO1 - 01 5 - 3 Drywall A - CTO1 - 01 5 - 4 2' x 4' white ceiling tile A - VFT01 - 01 5 - 5 Flooring (floor tile?) under carpet Positive Tile: ND Black Mastic: 3% Yes 1150 A - CB03 - 01 5 - 6 Brown covebase and mastic A - VFT02 - 01 5 - 7 12" x 12" white vinyl floor tile Positive Tile: ND Black Mastic: 3% Yes 1150 A- CB04 - 01 5 - 7 Brown covebase and mastic A - DWO1 - 02 - _ 5 - 8 Drywall A - DWO1 - 03 5 - 9 Drywall A - DWO1 - 04 5-10 Drywall A - MAS01 - 01 5 - 11 Carpet mastic A - CB05 - 01 5-12 Gray covebase A - DWO1 - 05 5 - 13 Drywall A - MAS01 - 02 5 - 14 Carpet mastic A - CTO2 - 01 5 - 15 2' x 4' off-white ceiling tile A - MAS01 - 03 5 - 16 Carpet mastic B - CLKO1 - 01 6 - 17 Caulk on bottom of exterior walls Notes: 21-1-09383-009 TABLE 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR PAINT SAMPLES BUILDING 14 -06 SHANNON & WILSON INC. Sample Identification ° r. ., :. -r ;. .. . Figure # '- Sample Description 4 Analytical Rasps! (mg /kg R. Analytical, Result (percent). LBP - 01 4 Gray paint on roof ventilation system 230 < 0.023 LBP - 02 4 White / off -white paint on cinderblocks on roof < 160 < 0.016 LBP - 03 4 Paint on metal covering on roof 3100 0.31 LBP - 04 4 Paint on wood panneling on roof 100 0.01 LBP - 05 3 White wall paint in stairwell < 270 < 0.027 LBP - 06 3 White wall paint on 2nd floor < 84 < 0.0084 LBP - 07 3 Brown paint on 2nd floor door frames 400 0.04 LBP - 08 2 White wall paint 1st floor < 190 < 0.019 LBP - 09 2 Brown paint on 1st floor door frames < 150 < 0.015 LBP - 10 2 White paint from cinderblocks 210 0.021 LBP - 11 2 Paint from metal shed walls 1100 0.11 LBP - 12 2 Paint on exterior cinderblocks 290 0.029 LBP - 13 2 Gray paint around exterior fire door 110 0.011 Notes: mg /kg = milligram per kilogram 21 -1- 09383 -009 - TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR PAINT SAMPLES HANGARS A AND B SHANNON & WILSON INC. Analytical Result (mg /kg) A alyti6 I (percent) A- LBP -01 5 Green paint from hangar beams 15,000 1.5 A- LBP -02 5 White paint from office interior < 77 < 0.0077 A- LBP -03 5 White paint from office interior < 160 < 0.016 A- LBP -04 5 White paint from doors and frames < 630 < 0.063 A- LBP -05 5 Paint of floor in hangar < 200 < 0.02 B- LBP -01 6 Paint from hangar walls 11,000 1.1 B- LBP -02 6 Lime green paint on exterior doors 9,200 0.92 Notes: mg /kg = milligram per kilogram 21 -1- 09383 -009 Date: 11 -16 -2001 File: I: \Drafting\211 \09383 -009\21 -1 -09383 -009 Asbestos Sample Vic.dwg ioTM Ct S 1 12TH ST •. 0 1/4 1/2 1 I I Scale in Miles NOTE Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS ®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or resale, without permission. All rights reserved. Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington VICINITY MAP November 2001 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Date: 11 -16 -2001 Author: LR File: I. \Diafling1211 \09383 - 009\21 -1- 09383 -009 Asbestos Sample Locs.dwy 1• 17• LBP -1 • 6 20 LBP -08 • 21 .8 LBP -09 ,12 13 LBP -13 15 • LBP -10 16 .18 • -y•17 LEGEND Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 40 Scale in Feet Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14 -06 GROUND LEVEL SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 2 GeotechnIcal and Environmental Consultants File: I: \Drattiny \211 \U9383- UU9 \21 -1 -09383 -009 Asbestos Saniple Locs.dwg 1• 17• LBP -1 • JE1••■■-- z Down LBP -05 LBP -07 LBP -06 y 5 LEGEND Fire Door 0 20 40 Scale in Feet ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14 -06 2ND FLOOR SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21- 1- 09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 3 Geotechniwl and Environmental Consultants Date. 11-16-2001 1:1Draf1in91211 \09383 - 009 \21 -1- 09383 -009 Asbestos Sample Lucs.dwy 0 1• 17• LBP -1 • .Amommew- z Vent 00 4 • LBP -01 • 5 1 • LBP -02 • LBP -03 LBP -04 Vents O• 0 LEGEND Lead Vent Caps Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 40 Scale in Feet Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14 -06 ROOF SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21 -1- 09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnicel and Environmental Consultants FIG. Environmental 0 nple Locs.dwg A -LBP -1 6 3 5 2 16 4 Al A2 A -LBP -3 A3 A -LBP -2 1 LEGEND Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential • Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) 17 • Sample Designation and Approximate Location A -LBP -1 • LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location A4 A -LBP -4 • •1011 0 20 40 Scale in Feet y A5 A -LBP -5 • Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington HANGAR A SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnlcal and Environmental Consultants FIG. 5 J 7 Q Dale: 11 -16 -2001 B1 B2 LEGEND • Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential • Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location 1 B3 B4 B5 B6 ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) 17 • Sample Designation and Approximate Location B -LBP -1 • LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 x'17 40 1 Scale in Feet • B -LBP -7 B7 B8 • B -LBP -6 Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington HANGAR B SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21 -1- 09383-009 SHANNON eotechnlcal end Env ronmentall Con FIG. 6 sultants SHANNON iWILSON, INC. APPENDIX A ASBESTOS HAZARD EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACT (AHERA) CERTIFICATES 21 -1- 09383 -009 • • Certificate of Completion zbtz i5 to certifp that Scott Gaulke ba5 5ati5factoritp tompteteb one bap of refre5ber training a5 a Project Designer to comply uitij the training requirements of Z!TQE 24 Title 3J3J / 40 CYR 763 (C3&) A RA Cer ied: M09907012 Certificate Number 999712 ARGUS —T1 SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE - n Expiration Date: Aug 16, 2002 Aug 16, 2001 Date(s) of Training Argus Pacific, Inc. • 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 • . • .... ls • ................. ............ .. . . . ...... Certificate of Completion .....-.'-: -1.: j4:----:,.'.',,i: 1:)1:- :.J ..;•.:..4,1 :-.1'; ....*.":i7;,- 'z?. •! . • s'• V.::::: .....-:i. •..! 1...1/4-:,...-;-'-'" 1 . . . ., ,...-..;.,..'0. :, 'II': 1-::•,,. ,. 1 .... , , ., ':,.'1,. • ' :-..-..,-7..v.. i':'... .. ,, Tr Tbi5 i5 to certifp tbat Scott. Gaulke ba5 atigeictoritp compiOeb 4 bour5 of refres'ber training et an Asbestos Building Inspector to comply Witt) tbe training requirements of Z6QCS Effie 3131 / 40 CIA. 763 (zmem) Certificate Number 999640 ng Ad 'station AHERA Certifi d: M09907012 ARGUS mr J./ sazi:N■ SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE - Aug 8, 2001 Date(s) of Training Expiration Date: Aug 8, 2002 Argus Pacific Inc • 1900 W Nickerson Suite 315 • Seattle Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 . --A _ . . ..... .. .... ... .. ... . pf,tp,%;;..• . r - . , d • „- _ . certificate of Comptetton Ebi5 i5 to certify tbat Cody Johnson bag gatisfacturilp cotrtpieteb 24 buur5 of training a5 an Asbestos- Building Inspector P )� to tom *Yp tije training requiremeut5 of ER,Qa -maitre 311 / 40 CCI'AR. 763 (RJQ3R.R) Akiji/ Trainin Administrate - n AHERA Certified: MO 07012 Certificate Number 997048 ARGUS D SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Expiration Date: Jan 5, 2002 Jan 3 - 5, 2001 Date(s) of Training Argus Pacific, Inc. • 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 • 1 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS 21 -1- 09383 -009 i NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 ■ AIHA ELLAP #101861 ) ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Batch#:21- 11882.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 23, 2001 Date Reported: October 29, 2001 Attention: Cody Johnson Total samples: 13 Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Sample # Lab ID Sample LoD in Results in Results in Wt.(g) mg/kg mg/kg Percent LBP -01 21106065 ,11880 110 230 0.0230 LBP -02 21106066 .08540 160 <160 <0.0160 LBP -03 21106067 .05010 270 3100 0.3100 LBP -04 21106068 .22380 60 100 0.0100 LBP -05 21106069 .05000 270 <270 <0.0270 LBP -06 21106070 .16130 84 <84 <0.0084 LBP -07 21106071 .06630 200 400 0.0400 LBP -08 21106072 .07280 190 <190 <0.0190 LBP -09 21106073 .09000 150 <150 <0.0150 LBP -10 21106074 .06360 210 210 0.0210 LBP -11 21106075 .16760 81 1100 0.1100 LBP -12 21106076 .23060 59 290 0.0290 (Results continued on next page) Instrument /Bench Run: 21102910 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram LoD = Limit of Detection '<' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Date Analyzed: October 29, 2001 Reviewed by: At Nick _ AMC' i Direc , Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 AIHA ELLAP #101861 ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attention: Cody Johnson Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Batch#:21- 11882.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 23, 2001 Date Reported: October 29, 2001 Total samples: 13 Sample # Lab ID Sample Wt.(g) LoD in Results in Results in mg/kg mg/kg Percent LBP -13 (Continued from previous page) 21106077 Method Blank <54.00mg /kg Post Digestion Matrix Spike: 102% Instrument /Bench Run: 21102910 .12080 110 110 0.0110 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram LoD = Limit of Detection ' <' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date Analyzed: October 29, 2001 al Directo Page 2 =III SHANNON &WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax Sample Identity CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax Lab No. Date Time Sampled Page Laboratory N'v i_. Attn • Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description , (include preservative if used) �o o�� Remarks /Matrix CA3o1- o\ i 1012.310) , jC . 1 v.\ Pa I_ G, lu1z.b)o) /- f GI \L o1- 01 • 1u)1.3j'L) � 1 VF`a1 -0) 1t-LLBe\ V. , L BP-ol Ior231o1 �c i L3P -0Z L dC -o3 �aP - os X l L!3 -e-v62 f 4 t., K .i 1 ?'j Pro'ect;. of X i'o �., 3 m,. , : y .. .. t i yid �F e , Sa 1pi e 11~a '+14r 4. ,.:�i.tr eT+.. -. �:d t e,,,;• rt a ;.. •` Iii¢ `irs le ::." 1'4101 u, d�B ni: -. q � .,7 e Signature: Time: f � <;MK y'• :F f -. �b t ei uiS 810D *. ''' ,"sL"T :...ryr...�Q. r•- 7a�53� Signature: Time: • >r 7Relinilyished By._:, Signature: Time: Project Number ?- t- t- o4)A83.:..cj Total Number of Containers i. l-G`ny Project Name: A1(.3 ,.Dc,..1,1) --% COC Seals/Intact? Y/N/NA Printed D4 e: Date: r t I2� /C ` Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: f Contact: C. uJ 'Svltihso...1 Received Good Cond./Cold / � G- 6v I, •", Ongoing Project? Yes • No Delivery Method: ry (attach shipping bill, if any) company. S 'i•'� y a .3: : �C � pz.k.- ,r.u....::.r+.e;` -rt4s :_ ,,,i9; 7 a? �x�� "- �., �.gti:>r.��`� ,. y{ AU,[� - - : g * ,�( R h .1 '�C i�4L. X Signature: Timer Company: �i�,zevir..._ ;-01,,•^' -:.... - or-. m .a t 1' -. t r 'k:�'++ �� .L4�. " ✓,: V 3•�P '�� x�- „PSPJ iLA`�lj� �Y. �y 2t�y + a• .w +is�ST�'bl,- IMS.....n +CIF ,.+n'x�1•':Fiv4 +z :`• Signature: Time: Company: ..�. .tin:r::. �C+�.h, r v�,,J ?� r 4 ~ Receilf# 3.';. .:,,, ,r/: .. �.`- 1,44.*.e ;kx,. rE / #:.q .. -_+.. .... Signature: Time: Sampler: G./1^Z' t �. ;d�� L;� � xi4 � � �`�k�- i + .. ''[: %:L.YLwr.4-,;:,: .,>r .d,,,,,vt'4j` "!� '.;V rr... �<. "tr:c; kt •: .v:;� ,,,� � `�- b.. �r �??�'r * r cT[ons 6:-Att . ; Requested Turnaround Time: C. �cs „` , Special Instructions: S ' 1 •). 1 sa P'O t \d (� c• S-C J. .-C. ri Printed Name: Date: a I Z��¢I Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: 4 .f7y3 /s Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: pVLS-/ Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR — Page •.� of =11 SHANNON &WILSON INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD tJ�i-- Laboratory I� Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 (include preservative if used) 695 Fax 872 -8178 Fax (206) -6777 (314) - 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 e< <5 (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax `� �J��\�� Date �.Q' ap L. `� Go Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled c,o �� N •S° & Remarks /Matrix ' LAP -a7 ./ &5J:,\\ X Lac)- -off 1 ,' .., l � Q P -j0 � LAP -11 I ProjectInformation, i s Sample'_ Receipt':` Relinquished By ;1:,, r ' Relinquished By > 2 Relinquished By : 3. Project Number. =t • i -�� -,`t z,-c1/41'j Total Number of Containers Signature: \ • Time:._. y�..J Signature: Time: Signature: Time: , t Project Name: ,1,,r E;E;06,,'2,... ..�,. ,, COC Printed Name: Date :' ; i 2 :., , ;, _.,;' \,•\`^ ` Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: (, ., -Q, 7 ..' 041,‘,1....3--, Received Good Cond. /Cold Ongoing Project? Yes • No 1pi Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company _- ., ` •-J Company Company: Sampler: C .4.-...S, + •• "' '._ ".fi'�r ^f: z3 /f sx ai r 5...� '% nstructions , � .�� 1: Receivea`By: : 1 ..7 Signature:-..--- _.- Time: y;t•"•:� '= °Receivecf° B��` , �� 2. "�-�'� y Signature: Time: , .. ��Received B y::: Signature: Time: Requested Turnaround Time: a `- ..� -_ -`= c ' Special Instructions: •" Printed Name: Date: iD%i, /o/ Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: 2.. %ri7a' =�- ' , Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: 4./ : L -- Company: . Company: - • F- 19 -91/UR No. NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 AIHA ELLAP #101861 ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attention: Cody Johnson Project #: 21 -1- 09323 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Batch#:21- 11909.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 24, 2001 Date Reported: October 31, 2001 Total samples: 7 Sample # Lab ID Sample Wt.(g) LoD in Results in Results in mg/kg mg/kg Percent A- LBP -01 A- LBP -02 A- LBP -03 A- LBP -04 A- LBP -05 B- LBP -01 B- LBP -02 21106367 21106368 21106369 21106370 21106371 21106372 21106373 Method Blank <54.00mg /kg Instrument /Bench Run: 21103104 .16800 .17450 .08680 .02130 .06880 .25470 .1.0270 80 15000 1.5000 77 <77 <0.0077 160 <160 <0.0160 630 <630 <0.0630 200 <200 <0.0200 53 11000 1.1000 130 9200 0.9200 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram LoD = Limit o Detection ' <' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Reviewed by: Date Analyzed: October 31, 2001 Page 1 "mill SHANNON & WILSON, INC. NEN Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd , Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis. MO 63141 (206) 632-8020 ' (314) 872-8170 2055 Hill Road . 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Fairbanks. AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 479-0600 . (907) 561-2120 mole Identil Lab No. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946-6309 Time Date Sam led Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) Page of Laboratory vvi Attn: .‘"t• ,q) .e Remarks/Matrix Kb' cP e . , A-1--u\ . 147,1A.,\ -).: •---7( LP-0L A - (2) • A - L 6 P 0 Li ) ...._ ..,_ I • - . Project Information Sample Receipt Relinquished By 1. Relinquished By . Relinquished By 3. Project Number: 2 1, ociA il-,,01 Total Number of Containers Signature. •, Time- ' _L Signature: Time: Signature: Time /. . /(r I4 6 . Project Name: /140F 5,c,„ ,..,_ COC Seals/Intact? YA Printed Nene Date: ; ...1 Printed Name. Date: Printed Name. Date: Contact: (.. j) 701,, s.)..... --, Received Good Cond./Cold ( - ,.., 0 )..,•• in S , " Ongoing Project?' Yes • No' Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company. / Company Company Sampler: ( 4 . - Instructions ... - ' . , • ReCelvad By: 1. Received By: 2. Received By: 3. Requested Turn Around Time: (-\ ,1._ *---,1 1••■ ..- . ) c.- r A Signature: Time: gi);):3,b, Signature: Time: Signature: Time: v.-- ._ _ Special Instructions. ,- -------- PrinTagame: Date: 70 . Printed Name: Date: Printed Name Date: Company: j.-L 4 ii...----- Company: .. Company: Distribution: White - w/shipment - returned to Shannon 8 Wilson w/ Laboratory report Yellow - w/shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File F-14-Q1 /I IR 1%J 25711R iHAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT TRAINING LABORATORY SERVICES NVL LABORATORIES INC 4708 AURORA AVE. N. SEATTLE. WA 98103 TOLL FREE 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) TEL 206. 547.0100 FAX 206. 634.1936 E -MAIL info @nvllabs.com www.nvIlabs.com October 29, 2001 Cody Johnson Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis; NVL Batch # 21- 11885.00 Dear Mr. Johnson: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SERVICES HwRiay Enclosed please find test results for the bulk samples submitted to our Laboratories for analysis. Examination of these samples was conducted for the presence of identifiable asbestos fibers using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance to U.S. EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Test Method. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the report will include findings for each layer (labeled LAYER 1 and LAYER 2, etc. for each individual layer). The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by visual estimation. For those samples with asbestos concentrations between 1 and 10 percent based on visual estimation, the EPA recommends a procedure known as point counting (NESHAPS, 40 CFR Part 61). Point counting is a statistically more accurate means of quantification for samples with low concentrations of asbestos. If you would like us to further refine the concentration estimates of asbestos in these samples using point counting, please let me know. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please feel free to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, 4*v Tec nical Director Enc.: Sample Results NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: ' 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106083 Client Sample #: CAB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray cementitious material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 7% Cement /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT Chrysotile 35% Lab ID #: 21106084 Client Sample #: WP01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Tan brittle material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% Binder & filler ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106085 Client Sample #: CLK01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: White /brown soft material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client �► Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 A /�*-v /- � Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Nic cl -TO!. hnica i��r J Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106086 Client Sample #: VFT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan vinyl tile, LAYER 2: Black mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 3% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder, Granules LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106087 Client Sample #: MAS01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106088 Client Sample #: MAS01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All b mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106089 Client Sample #: MAS01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106090 Client Sample #: MAS01 -04 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106091 Client Sample #: MAS01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client ∎�/ Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 ,,,r111, Analyzed Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 is IV -chnica _%• Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the'following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106092 Client Sample #: RM01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10 %, Glass fibers 17% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106093 Client Sample #: RM02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Black asphaltic material, LAYER 2: Tan paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 7 %, Glass fibers 15% LAYER 2: Cellulose 80% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106094 Client Sample #: TP01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Nic l Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106095 Client Sample #: TP02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106096 Client Sample #: TRP01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 30 %, Glass fibers 17% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106097 Client Sample #: CT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF. Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 55 %, Glass fibers 20% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Wei Long Tai Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate • • ' • pies are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 i 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP- #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106098 Client Sample #: CT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 65% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106099 Client Sample #: CT02 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 65% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106100 Client Sample #: CT03 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 55 %, Glass fibers 27% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 �/ N echnica ctor Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. • Page 6 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106101 Client Sample #: CT04 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan fibrous material with white paint, LAYER 2: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 70% LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Cellulose 3% LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106102 Client Sample #: CB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106103 Client Sample #: CB01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Nick L 4-077--%-tfail.1111111111 -ica 1'.. -4111Icr Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 7 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106104 Client Sample #: CB01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic, LAYER 3: Tan chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% LAYER 3: Cellulose 25% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder LAYER 3: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106105 Client Sample #: CB02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material; LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: . PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 N. r r' ical 1 • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separatelyAll-butksamp es are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. ge r/ cto Page NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106106 Client Sample #: TB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White woven fibrous material with white soft material, LAYER 2: Tan fibrous material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 55% LAYER 2: Cellulose 70% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Binder & filler ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106107 Client Sample #: DW01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: ; PERCENT LAYER 1: Chrysotile 2% LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sample comments: Composite result for whole sample equals <1% Asbestos Lab ID #: 21106108 Client Sample #: DW01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 20 %, Glass fibers 5% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 N. gg Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All Iiiiksa ples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in hill, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. ical Page 9 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected , ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106109 Client Sample #: DW01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint and white woven fibrous material, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5 %, Glass fibers 10% LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106110 Client Sample #: DW01 -04 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: Chrysotile LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder PERCENT 20/0 ND N' Sample comments: Composite result for whole sample equals <1% Asbestos (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Wei Long Tai Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 4710r-, echnica__!i - - • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106111 Client Sample #: DW01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106112 Client Sample #: DW01 -06 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: . PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106113 Client Sample #: DW01 -07 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White soft material, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 4% LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. Allbi i1 Z samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. 7 rf /'echnical or Page 11 1 ■ NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP- #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1 -09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ND ND Lab ID #: 21106114 Client Sample #: DW02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Yellow mastic, LAYER 2: White soft material, LAYER 3: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 3% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% LAYER 3: Cellulose 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler LAYER 3: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106115 Client Sample #: SV01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White sheet vinyl, LAYER 2: Gray fibrous material with yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 65% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Ni ical1'- • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A1113 amples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 12 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP. #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106116 Client Sample #: FOR01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White /brown brittle material, LAYER 2: Red mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 70% LAYER 2: Cellulose 5% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Wei Long Tai Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 bor,5•,-Av—'",.....r_--- .. G�� ►. r- ._ Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. -Alt'u �mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 13 • t Page_of -� CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory n)'JL- =11 SHANNON F�WILSON, INC. - 'and Geotechnical Environmental Consultants Attn 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 • Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872-8170 (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax (include preservative if used) 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, Al< 99518 Richland, WA 99352 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 " 2t g (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax y • '0 c J� 0C Date ,Q , ;� 4 CP Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled 0,o c' '- .o & Remarks /Matrix - 01- (- 1 iL)11:2- ;) %`- , - i i l tVi?L;;;1 l:3 -vL ,, j ). C A (.1‘- 05 ; u. :).2.1oi • ` Project Information ;;Sample Receipt t -. v Relingtaished By 1 Reltnpuishetl By ; 2 `; Relinquished By:. 3. Project Number:71 -1 -o !. -<:;d J Total Number of Containers Signature: Time: j �� Signature: Time: Signature: Time: / Project Name: A'1JF L,, n j COC Seals/Intact? Y /N /NA t,,rt.;,— J Contact: r ,:_L'_, .5, -,1, v,...i— Received Good Cond. /Cold Printed Name: Date: ; .,)/ .. ',/- ■ Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: .._. Ongoing Project? Yes • No ■ Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company .' • . ., , - ■..J t , •- -._ Company: Company: Sampler: 1-` T. Instructions tt, r ,-Received By 1 ; Received By: � L , ,; Received ,By: 3.... Requested Turnaround Time: - 1; Signature j Time: :? !.; j Signature: Time: ' Signature: Time: ._- -_- ems_ r� Special Instructions: j .t;�; ()c,:3- 1 :•_ t�J ;., C I. (.. f-e-f. l . Printed Name: Date: i�r --;;? =' -n) Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: 7Y11-11('t -: s - Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company • .'.11_.---.'. Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR Nn- of =' ="' SHANNON FIWILSON,INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory , , )_Page sow Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax (include preservative if used) 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way ,� Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 ..f ' (907) 479-0600 (907) 561-2120 (509) 946-6309 (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax �r @ -.. J�...'0. � Date FQ' ao r 4 CP Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled po c� ..q3 & Remarks /Matrix - -7 n t— 0 i 'l aL /'.i 1 `',' Y 1 1 1 i (- -1 O 7_ (-) 7 zz C.-7 (,.J - rJI ` j 1 LL al -0t (. t�c,t--<) L ( ') 1f i Project� Information `�:: < Sample Receipt - = Relinquished By 1 . ¢ : - SKI , f Relin uishedw By 2 > Relin wished B 3. i �— Project Number: _ ■ , 0 -, -, rS r-•'-`1 Total Number of Containers Signature: Time: i �-,i ., L) Signature: Time: Signature Time Project Name: ;i•1:) t' 'E ., a ».- ,.,, -. Contact: ,:.i .,,,•i.- •�,--. COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Received Good Cond. /Cold Printed Name: Date: • • Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date Ongoing Project? Yes • No ® 9 9 1 Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company:; a '..` -? Company: _ Company: Sampler: ( „-1/1:-.:, .z ,:. �,'.: �dF E r - f Instructions : ":..Y. Y ,..T z. ,, RecteivedlBY : 1:'•,t Signature: ' Time: c0 , �'.1w:i: �rtP dyt -1 ;.Received By 2 r':., Signature: Time: Received By , 3 Signature: Time Requested Turnaround Time: 0 - -- .. Special Instructions: `-. `-- (c„ i . \- � \J t �-- P() > • J-. J e i - • in Printed Name Date: ,;, 1-, ;•:,/ Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date /1/7A .:.- / Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: 71/...'/----- Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No ) r. • f;.._.. Page � of 5 9 =1U SHANNON F�WILSON, INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory j,' v 1- fi Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax (include preservative if used) 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 v (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 .-,` c., (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax -7, Jc,O�C�I Date �.Q' ° \`� _ ti CP Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled co �� •(=' & Remarks /Matrix MA 01 ��1- : 2.Lid,t ;- `; MA'.) L)1 k.)2 f / /J1/�7>vt -u 3 1. Yi t /n A- 01 - 3i-i l:-.)(iqol M A501- c.)'S j )/251 ��1 j 1 Q.,M01 -ok • I 1 tea1. -o\ - j (2, 0\-O 1' Project Information r: `Sample Receipt Relinquished. By 1 :` . Reltn.qulslied By ` ` 2. Relinquished By 3. Project Number: 7 1 • , 0'1' P, 5 -L-0`i Total Number of Containers Signature: /) Time: 1 j yJ Signature: Time: Signature: Time: ��' `_ Project Name: /43F- p,.,,�1,:,," . — 1 Contact: . •.,.- , •s- COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Received Good Cond. /Cold Printed Name: Date::,:;. >ir, I Printed Name: Date Printed Name: Date: Ongoing Project? Yes • No J 9 9 1 Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: ; c -t- ` ^) Company: Company: Sampler: (.4"-`17.3 . Instuctions u : .: - w R �ceive By ir':..:r Signatures i Time: ft -'S ".9 Received., Signature: Time: Received_ By .: Signature: Time: Requested Turnaround Time: 0 ( _. - - °- -- Special Instructions: �, 1 5 ti • 1 ^ 5 1 - `) v 5 ` T . J C ' Pi'infed Date: /r! -1, 7,--,;) Printed Name: Date. Printed Name: Date: JNarif6:T Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No =• Page L-1-- of `3 =III SHANNON 6W Ni •. ILSON,INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory ,/ , =WIMP Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 695 Fax 872 Fax (include preservative if used) (206) -6777 (314) -8178 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 - (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 - ,-- �� k5 (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax ■ �•• \�.e Date occQ `ao ;r' ti G Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled c, " .so O\ Remarks /Matrix - .� %2 - 1,\ \- <) I- '.J ;ii.!: L' C I •�; 0 I- 01 ",., !- j;- - 1vr ".-7. (i \ - C ) 1: i� • L. L •2 - i .- 1 ;, '' Project Information _', Sample Receipt :`:. ' . Relinquished By: 1. Relinquished ,By '° 2: ; ° Relinquished By 3. Project Number: -• • •> -', . --.-- ` Total Number of Containers Signature: . Time: :. _-' 1 Signature: Time. Signature: Time: F_ ( 1 it i •,.,,•. Project Name: /'i:.1 r r1uZ COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date:: .: `: =j -_ N. - `` Printed Name: Date Printed Name: Date: Contact: ±�_ ,, _.It . "..., ,t,. tic... -, Received Good Cond. /Cold Ongoing Project? Yes • No U Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) • Company:' ? '`• - ` ' Company: Company: Sampler: ( .1:• �i wF ri ti :Instlructions : ° ; Recei�ed)By: = Signature: ' Time r_ - n ,4.4,1P,.,,:;--t:. .. 2 aRecidyBY± Signature: Time Received. B 3. _ y::::.. Signature: Time Requested Turnaround Time < ". `. _ r. I _.__`..' _:r-- _........ _. _ • > Special Instructions: ` -, C.:. , 5. , L'; 7 ' `' ' % Printed Name: Date:: , r -2-:..10.- Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: i : -' Company. Company: F- 19 -91/UR No. NVL LABORATORIES INC 4708 AURORA AVE. N. SEATTLE. WA 98103 TOLL FREE 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) TEL 206. 547.0100 FAX 206. 634.1936 E -MAIL info @nvllabs.com wnw.nvIlabs.com October 29, 2001 Cody Johnson Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis; NVL Batch # 21- 11906.00 Dear Mr. Johnson: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SERVICES Enclosed please find test results for the bulk samples submitted to our Laboratories for analysis. Examination of these samples was conducted for the presence of identifiable asbestos fibers using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance to U.S. EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Test Method. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the report will include findings for each layer (labeled LAYER 1 and LAYER 2, etc. for each individual layer). The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by visual estimation. For those samples with asbestos concentrations between 1 and 10 percent based on visual estimation, the EPA recommends a procedure known as point counting.(NESHAPS, 40 CFR Part 61). Point counting is a statistically more accurate means of quantification for samples with low concentrations of asbestos. If you would like us to further refine the concentration estimates of asbestos in these samples using point counting, please let me know. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please feel free to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, Technical Director Enc.: Sample Results NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106345 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106346 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Steve Zhang Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 ►. ��� %erector J Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bu samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson,, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106347 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint, LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106348 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -04 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All :. amples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 N. Arl rical • i NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106349 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles. PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106350 Client Sample #: A- MAS01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106351 Client Sample #: A- MAS01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Steve Zhang Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 i Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106352 Client Sample #: A- MAS01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106353 Client Sample #: A- VFT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown mastic LAYER 2: White tile LAYER 3: Black asphaltic mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 2% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: Chrysotile 3% Lab ID #: 21106354 Client Sample #: A- VFT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White tile LAYER 2: Black asphaltic mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous matrix LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Steve Zhang Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A Tiu' • mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40.60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: Chrysotile 3% Lab ID #: 21106355 Client Sample #: A- CB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Grey rubbery material LAYER 2: White mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106356 Client Sample #: A- CB02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Grey rubbery material LAYER 2: White mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 dr Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A • ulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 J Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106357 Client Sample #: A- CB03 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106358 Client Sample #: A- CB04 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106359 Client Sample #: A- CB05 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client `a Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 10/29/2001y/� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Ni �ii *r ■ Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All :rillii;mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 6 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106360 Client Sample #: A- CT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey fibrous and porous material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 45 %, Glass fibers 15% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix, Perlite, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106361 Client Sample #: A- CT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey fibrous and porous material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 45 %, Glass fibers 15% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix, Perlite, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106362 Client Sample #: B- CLK01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey rubbery material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected Rubber /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 i Nic rrhnical ! • r Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5 -15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 7 • • • • Page /2 =11 SHANNON WILSON, INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory (\Iv,__ Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd:, Suite 276 • Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters /Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 (include preservative if used) (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 �:N�7 � k5 (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 5614483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax �(C.' \ . F' Date �Q ap iii `a\ Go Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled Go ok "1 .So & Remarks /Matrix A -€ tJ a1- 4 . ./?/ 20 !,I .•-/- Y- A - n Quo 1- 0 r - A•o10 1 -o`l 1 i t A- oOol -aS f t A - MA.cot, -vl j..__. i 4 - m AS61- _ 1 ► A . /)'i A s ci t - , 3 I 1 i • • 6 _ V 1"- i 0 1 - U `. } Project Information ;7..,.: _'' ; Sample; Receipt• • .Relinquished By 1. :.:Relinquished By 2. , )`Relinquished By ;, 3. Project Number 1 -1- 0`1 f3 -�`1 Total Number of Containers Signature: Time: j far Signature: Time: Signature: Time -, ` ' J / °� "- Project Name: jt4 J f' E. .. a r- �" COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date: ,.../),(.4p, i -' _ `` ".' `` `' 4, fri �.� `" , Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: r ., F . . - -- •, -1..5 Received Good Cond. /Cold Ongoing .Project. Yes tJ No Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company,/ ' ' j Company: Company: Sampler: G ,�^ '---N nstructions ReceivedBy::. 1.; `i :.Received. By: 2. Received By 3.. Requested Turnaround Time: ~ a 1 -,- t�' Signature. Time: '7 : •-i'0 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: �>. — -' "- Special Instructions: S �- , 1 nnJ' ( „ -- �.: �. -.ter' , . Piiiited Name: Date: ; i z..4 f%:1 Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Wilson Job File Company: , Company: Company: Pink - Shannon & - F- 19 -91/UR No. • Page 2 of : l__ "'"' SHANNON &WILSON, INC. /, • CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory V �t-- Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attn• ' 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 -- Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (206) 632 -8020 (314).872 -8170 (206) 695-6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax (include preservative if used) 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 1.4 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946-6309 . t ' (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax �J 5 J�� `tee Sample Identity Lab No. Time . Sampled ed Go��Cj�'�v' .c) O\ Remarks /Matrix • - A- C.(201- 0 \ iDI1t,1u) r - -,:. A -( (' QT. -�,) ! i A--- (_( 03 -01 , A-- C:xr)LI- ol 1 1 PC - r, e s- -O\ ( A - r,;oi -a' j j A- c -To / - - vl f ‘3 -- (t % 01 -. o ■ r CEri 1. -Ar Cf Project Information ' Sample Receipt Relinquished By 1. •'.' Relinquished By:: - 2. Relinquished By:. 43. Project Number:11 -1- 0c13L3- `7 Total Number of Containers Signature: ) Time: ru 1-,.„) i Signature: Time Signature: Time ,,, j r , i Project Name: /14 F F.--.-7, r.�,6 , t Contact: '.:,. S r, j,,,,. y o - COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Received Good Cond. /Cold Printed Narpe:'', Date: !;>,., r;,, . ( Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: ;. - ' .._......)1.1 ' ` '- %' Ongoing Project? Yes • No P9 g g ) Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: : _. .) .1,-.1.--j Company: Company: Sampler: C 4,-• .'.;,Instructions ;Receivedt`By 1 - '. Received. By , 2: Received By 3.• Requested Turnaround Time: Signature: \mi .- Time: _?1 = sQ Signature: Time: Signature: Time: - :-- - - -=-- • ^ Special Instructions: Printed Name: .0 Date: � 5 Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: /12-7-Yee/ Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: i-)11---- Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No. APPENDIX C SITE PHOTOGRAPHS SHANNON bWILSON. INC. 21 -1- 09383 -009 Photo A: Roof of Building 14 -06 with ACM siding, tar patch on duct work, and built -up roofing materials. Photo B: Interior of Building 14-06 showing wall system with ACM joint compound. 21 -1- 09383 -009 Photo C: Exterior of Hangar A showing LBP on hangar walls. Photo D: Office section in Hangar A showing vinyl floor tiles with ACM mastic. 21 -1- 09383 -009 Photo E: Exterior of Hangar B showing LBP on hangar walls. Photo F: Interior of Hangar B showing green LBP on hangar beams. 21-1-09383-009 SHANNON 6WlLSON. INC. APPENDIX D IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT 21 -1- 09383 -009 ISHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attachment to and part of Report 21 -1- 09383 -009 Date: November 16, 2001 To: Mr. Bart Heath The Seneca Real Estate Group Important Information About Your Geotechnical/Environmental Report CONSULTING SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND FOR SPECIFIC CLIENTS. Consultants prepare reports to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, your consultant prepared your report expressly for you and expressly for the purposes you indicated. No one other than you should apply this report for its intended purpose without first conferring with the consultant. No party should apply this report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the consultant. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS BASED ON PROJECT - SPECIFIC FACTORS. A geotechnical/environmental report is based on a subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a unique set of project - specific factors. Depending on the project, these may include: the general nature of the structure and property involved; its size and configuration; its historical use and practice; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; other improvements such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities; and the additional risk created by scope -of- service limitations imposed by the client. To help avoid costly problems, ask the consultant to evaluate how any factors that change subsequent to the date of the report may affect the recommendations. Unless your consultant indicates otherwise, your report should not be used: (1) when the nature of the proposed project is changed (for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated one, or chemicals are discovered on or near the site); (2) when the size, elevation, or configuration of the proposed project is altered; (3) when the location or orientation of the proposed project is modified; (4) when there is a change of ownership; or (5) for application to an adjacent site. Consultants cannot accept responsibility for problems that may occur if they are not consulted after factors which were considered in the development of the report have changed. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE. Subsurface conditions may be affected as a result of natural processes or human activity. Because a geotechnical/environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions should not be based on a report whose adequacy may have been affected by time. Ask the consultant to advise if additional tests are desirable before construction starts; for example, groundwater conditions commonly vary seasonally. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical/environmental report. The consultant should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. MOST RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS. Site exploration and testing identifies actual surface and subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken. The data were extrapolated by your consultant, who then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions. The actual interface between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than your report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from those predicted in your report. While nothing can be done to prevent such situations, you and your consultant can work together to help reduce their impacts. Retaining your consultant to observe subsurface construction operations can be particularly beneficial in this respect. A REPORT'S CONCLUSIONS ARE PRELIMINARY. The conclusions contained in your consultant's report are preliminary because they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork; therefore, you should retain your consultant to observe actual conditions and to provide conclusions. Only the consultant who prepared the report is fully familiar with the background information needed to determine whether or not the report's Page 1 of 2 1/2001 recommendations based on those conclusions are valid and whether or not the contractor is abiding by applicable recommendations. The consultant who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the adequacy of the report's recommendations if another party is retained to observe construction. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION. Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretation of a geotechnical/environmental report. To help avoid these problems, the consultant should be retained to work with other project design professionals to explain relevant geotechnical, geological, hydrogeological, and environmental findings, and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to these issues. BORING LOGS AND /OR MONITORING WELL DATA SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT. Final boring logs developed by the consultant are based upon interpretation of field logs (assembled by site personnel), field test results, and laboratory and/or office evaluation of field samples and data. Only final boring logs and data are customarily included in geotechnical/environmental reports. These final logs should not, under any circumstances, be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. To reduce the likelihood of boring log or monitoring well misinterpretation, contractors should be given ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering/environmental report prepared or authorized for their use. If access is provided only to the report prepared for you, you should advise contractors of the report's limitations, assuming that a contractor was not one of the specific persons for whom the report was prepared, and that developing construction cost estimates was not one of the specific purposes for which it was prepared. While a contractor may gain important knowledge from a report prepared for another party, the contractor should discuss the report with your consultant and perform the additional or alternative work believed necessary to obtain the data specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating purposes. Some clients hold the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps prevent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes that aggravate them to a disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY. Because geotechnical /environmental engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against consultants. To help prevent this problem, consultants have developed a number of clauses for use in their contracts, reports and other documents. These responsibility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to transfer the consultant's liabilities to other parties; rather, they are definitive clauses that identify where the consultant's responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your consultant will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. The preceding paragraphs are based on information provided by the ASFE /Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences, Silver Spring, Maryland Page 2 of 2 1/2001 fry?. 11 • N 11 11 ii' x624 1 MM MMMMMMM _ s sssissssas /i - - -. MMMMMMMMMMMMMM w . . MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Cae. II i'-' -- -i iii /�•tl/ i 1 131ffa Ccrisulting Engineers 1201 Third Av+erue. 8ulte 900 Seattle. Wastdagton 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 Ise . Title . Date Drawn Scde Job No. 4.11.11.43 411 0 50 GRAPHIC SCALE 100 200 400 1 inch = 100 ft. HORZ: ,)/p4-7N1 King Cot Internatiounnal y Airport King County International Airport/Boeing Field Puget Sound LOCATION MAP Scale : NONE VICINITY MAP Scale : NONE PROJECT SUMMARY Relocate one hangar — steel structure with metal siding — due to expansion of Museum of Flight and build three new similor small aircraft hongors on lot 14 at the King County Intemationol Airport Toilet facilities and offices to be located within hongors os indicated on plans. New aircraft rated asphalt to be provided oround hangars, new porking stalls provided on existing paving, and new landscaping provided ot street front with modifications to existing curb cuts. BUILDING USES EXISTING ZONING: Commercial. CODES: Uniform Building Code: 1997 PROPOSED BUILDING USE Aircraft Hangar. Uniform Mechanical Code: 1997 Uniform Fire Code: 1997 EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE SITE: Removed under separate contract. WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY CODE: Prescriptive. SPRINKLERS /FIRE ALARMS: Yes AREA AND OCCUPANT LOAD OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS: Hongor 1: Area = 11,040s.f., Occ. Lood = 22 Hongor 2: Area = 15,400s.f., Occ. Load = 30 Hangar 3: Area = 22,750s.f., Ott. Load = 45 Hangar 4: Area = 13,500s.f., Occ. Lood = 28 U.B.C. OCCUPANCY GROUP AND TYPE 0 FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS: S -5, LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 14 That portion of King County Internationol Airport (Boeing Field) in Section 33, Township 24 North, Ronge 4 East, W.M., conveyed to the Boeing Company by King County by lease No. 11 (1965), 2A (1963), and 2B (1994), described as follows: Beginning at at Concrete Monumnet designoted as Monument 'D' and having o U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Coordinate of X= 1,637,871.14, Y= 195,351.46; Thence south 72'48'11' west 229.73 feet to a point 425 feet southwesterly of, measured at right angles to, the centerline of the main runway of soid airport and the true point of beginning. Thence south 6727'45' west 24.34 feet; Thence south 28'42'05' eost, and parallel with the centerline of said main runway. o distonce of 488.61 feet; Thence south 61'17'55" west 77.66 feet; Thence south 28'42'05' east 61.69 feel; Thence north 61'17'55' east 77.66 feet; Thence south 28'42'05' eost 146.39 feet; Thence south 6727'45' west running porollel to and 60 feet northweesterly of, measured at right ongles, to the centerline of on access taxiway o distonce of 375.10 feet to the northeasterly margin of Eost Marginal Woy South; Thence north 22'32'06' west along said northeasterly margin 257.46 feet; Thence north 6727'54' east, at right angles to said northeasterly margin, 149.00 feel; Thence north 22'32'06' west, parallel with said northeasterly margin, 259.00 feet; Thence south 6727'54' west , 149.00 feet to said northeasterly margin; Thence north 2732'06' west, along said margin, 590.69 feet; Thence north 6727'54' eost, at right ongles to said margin 262.86 feet: Thence south 28'42'05' eost 381.58 feet; Thence south 53'06'55' east 40.78 feet to the true point of beginning. Containing an area of 309,048 square feet. ±7.095 Acres more or less. Subject to o 10 foot easement for sewer, said easement being parallel to the easterly margin of Morginol Woy South and lying easterly and adjacent thereto. Situoted in the City of Tukwilo, County of King, State of Washington. BUILDING 14-06 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 Eost, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at o point on the eost morgin of East Marginal Way, said point being north 23'41'03' west a distonce of 351.24 feet along said margin from the intersection of the south fine of Henry Von Asselt Donation Land Claim No. 50 with the east margin of said East Morginol Way, os marked by a monument on the west boundary of Boeing Field, said point also being point of intersection of said easterly margin with the shore fine of the Duwomish River, as established by Commercial Waterway District No, 1; Thence continuing north 2341'03' west along soid eost margin, o distance of 202.75 feet to the true point of beginning; Thence north 6618'57' east ot right angles to said easterly morgin, a distance of 149.00 feet; Thence north 2341'03' west parallel to said easterly margin, a distance of 259 feet to the northwesterly fine of Parcel B of a troct of lond conveyed to Friday, Inc., by deed recorded under recording 5286620; Thence south 66'18'57' west a distance of 149 feet to on intersection with the easterly morgin of East Morginol Way, Thence south 2341'03' east along soid easterly margin, o distance of 259 feel to the true point of beginning; Except any portion thereof lying northeasterly of o line 500 feet westerly of, as measured at right angles, and parallel with the centerline of the main runway of Boeing Field; and except any portion thereof lying, within the King County Airport boundary as described in Decree of Appropriation recorded under Recording No. 5032254, and as conveyed to King County under deeds recorded under Recording Nos. 5134399 and 5399334; The parcel described above contains 38,591 square feet (0.89 acre), more or less. Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, Stote of Woshington. • EOZ-00 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA JAN 2 3 2002 PERMIT CENTER 8 A MARK ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 1/22/02 12/11/01 REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CIMawum.e13101e3M•e BEEMI mnws7e- kawnwlarlm. Ooo krra.w70ML aro. WTI Toe SEAM( Rh eer+oe CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1•1Oa424•5555 iil•iiY Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia St.vart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT COVER SHEET DESIGNED BY: CADD PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 7690000.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. G -000 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SYMBOL INDICATION DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL sm -SHT. SHOWN ON DETAIL NUMBER DETAIL SHT. REFERRED FROL1,2; — ` SHT. SHOWN ON ELEVATION LLnLR ELEVATION -SHT. SHOWN ON SECTION LETTER SHT. REFERRED FROM ✓i DOOR NUMBER R001.1 ROOM NAME & ROOM NUMBER CALLOUT CALLOUT CALLOUT CALLOUT CALLOUT- REVISION LETTER & REVSION CLOUD DOOR I SECTION SHT. SHOWN ON ROOM NAME MATERIAL INDICATION IILVIIE I BATT INSULATION AND INSULATED PARTITION RIGID INSULATION EARTH GRAVEL CONCRETE WOOD BLOCKING STRUCTURAL STEEL WOOD PLYWOOD FINISH WOOD ABBREVIATIONS ABV. ABOVE ACT ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE/ PANEL ALT. ABBRNAIHISHED FLOOR ALUM. ALUMINUM &FS. ACOUST. ACOUSTICAL ALIEN. ATTENUATION ASSY. ASSEMBLY AT 8LKG. BLOCKING BM. BEAM BOT. BOTTOM B.O. BOTTOM OP BTWN. BETWEEN BLDG. BUILDING 4/CL CENTERUNE CLG. CEILING CONC. CONCRETE COND. CONDITION CONN. CONNECTION CONST. CONSTRUCTION CONT. CONTINUOUS CPT. CARPET CLR CLEAR C.O. CONCRETE OPENING C.S. CONCRETE SEALER CAB'T CABINET CONTR. CONTRACTOR o DIAMETER DBL DOUBLE 0.0. DOOR OPENING DIM. DIMENSION DWG DRAWING D.F. DRINKING FOUNTAIN DR. DOOR DIA. DIAMETER DLT. DETAIL EA. EACH EL ELEVATION ELEV. ELEVATION EP. EPDXY PAINT E.W.C. ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXIST. EXISTING EXP. EXPOSED STRUCTURE ELEC. ELECTRICAL FAI FRESH AIR INTAKE FC FABRIC COVERING F.F. FACTORY FINISH FIN.FLR. FINISH FLOOR F.O.B. FACE OF BLOCK F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRETE F.O.S. FACE OF STUDS FT. FOOT F.B. FIAT BAR FIR. FLOOR FND. FOUNDATION F.R. FIRE RATED GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GRDRL GUARDRAIL GYM GYPSUM WALL BOARD GYP. 8D. GYPSUM BOARD GL GLASS /GLOSS H.C. HANDICAPPED HDF HANDICAPPED DRINKING FOUNTAIN HDR HEADER HOT, HT HEIGHT IBA HOLLOW METAL HR. HOUR HWH HOT WATER HEATER HEWC HANDICAPPED ELECTRICAL WATER COOLER • I.D. INSIDE DIAMETER INSTALL INSTALLATION INSUL INSULATION INTERMED.INTERMEDIATE INT. INTERIOR JT. MArts MAX. M.B. MECH. MEZZ. MFR. MIN. MO MTL N0. // N.I.C. N.T.S. 0.D. 0.H. 0/0 OPP. 0.C. OPNG PART'N PLYWD. PNL PR. PT R PTS. LB. // R RB REF. REQ'D R.D. R.O. REV. RESIL REFL RM SAN. SCHED. SHT. SHWR SIM. STD. STL STRUCT. SUSP. S.S. S/S SECT. SPECS. TELE. T.O.P. T.O.S. T.O.W. T.S. TYP. U.B.C. U.O.N. V.L.F. VCT V.B. VERT. WD WT W.F. W.R. W/ JOINT MATERIALS MAXIMUM MOLLY BOLT MECHANICAL MEZZANINE MANUFACTURER MINIMUM MASONRY OPENING METAL NUMBER NOT IN CONTRACT NOT TO SCALE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OPPOSITE HAND OUT TO OUT OPPOSITE ON CENTER OPENING PARTITION PLYWOOD PANEL PAIR PAINT PLATE POINTS POUND RISER RESILIENT BASE REFERENCE REQUIRED ROOF DRAIN ROUGH OPENING REVISE RESILIENT REFLECTED SANITARY SCHEDULE SHEET SHOWER SIMILAR STANDARD STEEL STRUCTURAL SUSPENDED STAINLESS STEEL SERVICE SINK SECTION SPECIFICATIONS TREAD TELEPHONE TOP OF PARAPET TOP OF STEEL TOP OF WALL TUBE STEEL TYPICAL UNIFORM BUILDING CODE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VERIFY P4 FIELD VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VAPOR BARRIER VERTICAL WOOD WEIGHT WIDE FLANGE WATER RESISTANT WITH 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY roRn IPEIT NOON .nB.I►TCMIIL aVD. SFR e- .a�TfA.I► r CALI 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 00'42455 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT LEGEND & ABBREVEATIONS DESIGNED BY: CADD PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 7690001.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. G -001 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 22x34 TFTLEBLOCK (1AUC01) .\ ./"--r*--- INDEX OF DRAWINGS _ GENERAL ARCHITECTURAL �, MECHANICAL 1 J SHEET NUMBER FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV -J DATE SHEET NUMBER FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE UMBER NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE Y Y G 000 G 001 )69G000.DWG 764C441.QwG_1EGEND COVER SHEET AND ABBREVIATIONS INQEX OF ORAWINCS B : 1 22 02 111,01%111111 2/OZ Y AS100 769A5- 100.DWC ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN B 1 22 02 lL' MO 769MO.DWG SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS B 1 22 02 AE1O1 AE102 AE102 769AE- 101.DWC 769AE- 102.DWG 769AE- 103.DWC FVNCAR 1 FLOOR PLAN ANNIWIIIIIMIEMI FUINCAR 2 FLOOR PLAN �o11117� HANGAR {3 FLOOR PLAN 8 ! 1/22/02 MH101 MH102 MH103 769MH102.'W 769MH103.DWC HANGAR FNA FLofR PLAN HANGAR 3 HVAC FLOOR PUN : B 1 22 0 1 1/22/02 1 22 02 1/22/02 1/22/02 1 2 Y C 002 169G002.DWC 61 AE104 769AE- 104.OWG 769AE- 201.DWG HANGAR 4 FLOOR PLAN HANGAR 1 ELEVATIONS 8 8 1 I MH104 769MH10a.DWC 769MSDO.DWG HANGAR 4 HVAC FLOOR PLAN DETAILS AND SECTIONS B B AE201 1/22/02 j� M500 CIVIL AE202 769AE- 202.DWG HANGAR 2 ELEVATIONS B 1 22 02 ©� 600 769M600.DWC MECHANICAL SCHEDULES B AE203 X301 769AE -203 DWG HANGAR 3 ELEVATIONS AM MI B af ha•�� N w SHEET NUMBER FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE 1 22 02 ��gI a�©{AE403 Imam amEMBA.E600 1 22 02 1 2 0 1/22/02 22 02 ,■� 769AE- 301.DWG WALL SECTIO SELEVATIONS . B 8 22 02 " , 302 769AE- 302.DWG WALL SECTIONS 1/22/02 PLUMBING Y C -0.1 LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS B AE401 769AE- 401.DWG HANGAR 11 ENLARGED & REEL CLG P • B 1/22/02 Y C 0.2 NOTES B 402 769AE- 402.DWG HANGAR 2 ENLARGED & REEL CLG P B 1 22 02 NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE Y C 0.3 CML INDEX PLAN 1 B 769AE- 403.OWG HANGAR 13 ENLARGED & REEL CLG P • Km ammo MBER CML INDEX PLAN 2 B AE404 769AE- 404.DWG 769AE- 600.DWG CLG P ilmUEIIMM Y Y C 0.4 C -1.1 - - 1EUPORARt EROSON AND SEDIMENTATON CONTROL PLAN B HANGAR 14 ENLARGED & REEL. ROOM FINISH SCH., TLT. RM. PLAN /EL :311.1WaaFRZNO Y M' DOOR SCHEDULE /DOOR DETAILS 1���0�� 769PL101.DWG �1 PLUMBING PLAN III B 1 22 02 Y Y Y C 1.2 C 1.3 C 2.1 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATON CONTROL PLAN TEMPORARY ER051011 AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAINS DEMOLITION PLAN 8 B B ra AE601 769AE- 601.DWG 769PL102.DWC HANGAR j2 PLUMBING PLAN v�aID�ur' ©mrAIIMIIIIIIII 769PL103.DWG HANGAR 3 PLUMBING PLAN A111171117W __ OCIIIM■11 769PL104.DWG RANGAR {4 PLUMBING PLAN ••111a217/7•1 PLUMBING SCHEDULES B 1/22/02 769P600.DWG Y Y C 2.2 C 2.3 DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN B B 1/22/02 1/22/02 LANDSCAPING illif FIRE PROTECTION Y Y C 2.4 C 2.5 DEMOLITION PLAN DEMOLITION PLAN a B 1/12/0 1/22/0 SHEET NUMBE' ,� FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE SHEET SHEET TITLE REV DATE Y C 3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN B 1 2 I LI101 - IRRIGATION PLAN IRRIGATION DETAILS 8 B Ix UMBER NAME 3.2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN B B 6 ID�L�Oilitw 1 22 0m 1 22 01 1/22/02 1/22/02 Y Irj 101 769FX101.DWC HANGAR'1 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PUN 7 B 1 22 02 Y Y Y C C 3.3 C 3.4 GRADING AND DRANAGE PUN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN LP101 - - PLANTING PLAN 1 B 1/22/02 Pe� 102 769FX102.DWC HANGAR 2 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PUN IiRak1i PLANTING PUN 2 B 1 22 02 FX103 769FX103.DWG HANGAR )3 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PUN B 1/22/02 kLP102 P103 - - PLANTING DETAILS 8 T FX104 769FX104.DWG HANGAR 4 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PUN B 1 22 02 Y Y C 3.5 C 3.6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS 8 B 1/22/02 1/22/02 1/22/01 �I „ ♦ Y C 3.7 STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS B 1 /22 /02 ELECTRICAL Y C 3.8 STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS B 1 22 02 INF e Q Q • w SHEET NUMBER FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE Y C -3.9 STORM DRAINAGE DETAILS B 1/22/02 UTILITY PLAN B 1/22/02 Y C 4.1 - PLAN 8 1/22/02 Y E 1 769E1.DWC LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS 8 GENERAL NOTES 1 B IIIMII 1/22/02 Y Y C 4.2 C 4.3 - - UTILITY UTILItt PLAN B 1/22/02 1/22/02 Y EDS -100 769EDS100.DWG PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOUTION PUN \ B Y EDS 769EDS101.DWC PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN B 1/22/02 Y C 4.4 UTIUTY PLAN B -101 Y ES 100 769E5100.DWG PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN B 1 22 02 Y C -4.5 UTILITY DETAILS 8 1/22/02 1/22/02 Y ES 101 769ES101.DWC PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 1 B 1/22/02 Y C -5.1 - PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN B Y EL 401 769EL401.DWG HANGAR 11 LIGHTING PLAN tA B 1/22/02 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN B 1/22/02 Y EL 402 769EL402.DWG HANGAR a2 LIGHi1NG PLAN • B 1 22 02 Y Y Y C -5.2 C -5.3 C 5.4 - - PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN 8 B 1/22/02 1/22/02 Y EL 403 769EL403.DWG I-NCAR i3 LIGHTING PLAN 1 B 1/22/02 Y EL 404 769EL404.DWC HANGAR {4 LIGHTING PLAN 8 1/22/02 Y EP -401 769EP401.DWG HANGAR j1 POWER & AUXILU�FtY SYSTEMS P .A 8 1 22 02 �i 1/22/02 1 22 02 Y C -5.5 - PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN B 1 22 02 Y EP -402 769EP402.DWC 769EP403.DWG HANGAR !2 POWER &AUXILIARY SYSTEMS P 1D FIANCAR {3 POWER &AUXILIARY SYSTEMS P AIIII Y C -5.6 - PAVING DETAILS B 1/22/02 Y EP -403 STRIPING SIGNING AND SIGNAL MODIFICATION PUN 8 1 22 02 Y EP -404 769EP404.DWG 769E601.DWC HANGAR j4 POWER do AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PU J Y Y C 6.1 C -6.2 - - STRIPING, SIGNING AND SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN B 1/22/02 1 22 02 Y E -601 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 1WM =MB B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER�10 1/22/02 12/11/01 DATE Y C -6.3 - STRIPING SIGNING AND SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN B Wir Q A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER {B Y C 6.4 - STRIPING SIGNING AND SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN 8 1 22 0 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS Y C -6.5 - - STRIPING. SIGNING AND SIGNAL MOD. DETAILS 8 1/12/02 a THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 1MBt�0e •m. rxle.rtrarilI. uxc..utc am �� STRUCTURAL SHEET NUMBER FILE NAME SHEET TITLE REV DATE Y S -100 - HANGARS {1, 2. 3, tE 4 STRUCTURAL NOTES 1/22/02 Y S -101 - HANGAR 1 FOUNDATION PUN. SECTIONS AND DETAILS 1/22/02 12F EPLAN ' 1MU.L 48 HOS 1 BEFORE YOU DIG 140424-5555 t Effig Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 Y 5 -201 - HANGAR OUNDATION SECTOS AND DETAILS 1 /22/02 Y 5 -202 - HANGAR 2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN ✓} TRANSVERSE SECTON 1/22/02 1/22/02 1/22/02 Y S -203 - HANGAR 2 ELEVATIONS Y 5 -204 - HANGAR 2 STEEL DETAILS AND SECTIONS APPROVED Cyntnw Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Y 5 -205 - HANGAR 2 STEEL DETAILS AND SECTIONS 1/22/02 Y 5 -206 - HANGAR 2 STEEL DETAILS AND SECTIONS 1/22/02 Y 5 -301 - HANGAR 3 FOUNDATON PLAN SECTOS AND DETARS B 1/12/02 Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER Y 5 -302 - HANGAR 3 FOUNDATION SECTOS B 1/22/02 Y S -401 - HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETAILS B 1/22/02 Y S -402 - HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION SECTOS B 1/22/02 KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT IMM.N )- a I INDEX OF DRAWINGS DESIGNED BY: GADD PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TCT CAD FILE NO. 769G002.DWG CHECKED BY: NSF DRAWING NO. G -002 DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN 22x34 TFTLEBLOCK (1AUC01) UPDATED BY 0 iY PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 2002 11:45 :05 AM FILE PATH 6 NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101163 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KEIA- LEGENMTVG = 1-) CO CO O ▪ o a 0 X CO CC, -3 J LEGEND EXISTING (PER SURVEY) ASPHALTIC CONCRETE e1 .mau BUILDING CANOPY BUILDING LINE CHAIN -LINK FENCE CONCRETE SURFACE • ; CONIFER TREE (SIZE NOTED) DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE NOTED) Y FIRE HYDRANT • CAS METER O GAS VALVE E- GUY ANCHOR UGHT POLE Q 0 TRAFFIC POLE WITH LUMINARE D4 WATER VALVE -4462----- I2 SD_ 8' SS 3' W PROPOSED MAIN TAXIAWAY, 3• AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12" COMPACTED SUBGRADE LESSER TAXIAWAY, 2 AC OVER 6. CRUSHED CSTC OVER 1Y COMPACTED SUBGRADE APRON/TIE-DOWN/PARKING, 2 AC OVER. 4. CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12- COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE FINISH GRADE CONTOUR. STORM DRAIN LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATER LINE FILTER FABRIC FENCE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION RIDGE LINE 0 INLET PROTECTION 55i215 SPOT ELEVATION O CATCH BASIN (TYPE 1) ® CATCH BASIN (TYPE 2) FLOW DIRECTION -O -O -O - CHAIN LINK FENCE EASEMENT UNE DRAWING INDEX SHEET No. CRANING TITLE C -0.i LEGEND, NOTES AND ABBREVIATIONS C -0.2 GENERAL NOTES C -0.3 OVIL INDEX PLAN 1 C-0.4 OVIL INDEX PLAN 2 C -1.1 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN C -1.2 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN C -1.3 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS C -2.1 DEMO PLAN C -2.2 DEMO PLAN C -2.3 OEM0 PLAN C -2.4 OE■0 PLAN C -2.5 OEM0 PLAN C -3.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -3.2 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -3.3 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -3.4 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -3.5 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C -3.6 DRAINAGE PLAN DETAIL C -3.7 DRAINAGE DETAILS C -3.8 DRAINAGE DETAILS C -3.9 DRAINAGE DETAILS C -4.1 uTiUTY PLAN C -4.2 UTILITY PLAN. C -4.3 vnUTY PLAN C -4.4 UTIUTY PLAN C -4.5 UTIUTY DETAILS C -5.1 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C -5.2 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C -5.3 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C -5.4 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C -5.5 PAVING AND HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN C -5.6 PAVING DETAILS C -6.1 STRIPING, SIGNING AND SIGNAL MODIFICATION PLAN C -6.2 STRIPING, SIGNING AND 9C21AL MODIFICATION PLAN C -6.3 STRIPING, SIGNING AND SIGNAL MOOWICADON PLAN C -6.4 STRIPING, 9GNING AND SIGNAL MODFCATON PLAN C -6.5 STRIPING AND SIGNING DETAILS BENCHMARKS: 8i GAS METER 9 w WATER METER H LATE VALVE 44 TEE W/ THRUST BLOCK •I BEND W/ THRUST BLOCK O REDUCER ll FIRE HYDRANT • FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CLEANOUT C CAP HORIZONTAL DATUM: BASED ON KING COUNTY AIRPORT DATUM USING SOUTH 28'42'09' EAST FOR THE CENTERLINE OF THE RUNWAY. VERTICAL DATUM: NAVD 88 BENCHMARK TP 18: SET CHISELED SQUARE AT THE BACK OF WALK AT 1ST TAR SEAM SOUTH OF 1ST METRO MANHOLE SOUTH OF TP 17. ELEV =18.87 BENCHMARK TP 19: SET CNI5E110 SQUARE AT THE TOP BACK OF CURB AT A POINT ON CURVE ON FACE OF CURB OF TRAFFIC ISLAND TO NORTH EXTENDED IN SOUTHEAST QUADRANT CF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH & SOUTH 86TH PLACE. ELEV =18.25 BENCHMARK TP 111: SET CHISELED SQUARE AT THE TOP BACK OF CURB AT A CATCH BASIN CN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH & SOUTH 87TH PLACE. ELEV •18.64 • ABBREVIATIONS: AC. A /C. ACP ADA ADS AVE. BC 801 BLDG. BM BNSF BOT BW CB CC CG • a CO COMP CONC CONST CP CSBC CSTC CW DI OTL DET DIA.. • E EA ECb EEL. ELEV EP EV EX. EXIST FC FF FG GA GP CV IE ILL IRR. LOX LF L5 LT MH MIN MW N NTS OF 0/11 P ASPHALT CONCRETE (PAVEMENT) AMERICAN DISABILITIES ACT PLASTIC PIPE AVENUE BACK OF CURB BURIED CABLE MARKER BUILDING BENCHMARK BNSF BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTE FE RAILROAD BOTTOM BOTTOM OF WALL CATCH BASIN CONCRETE CURB CONCRETE GUTTER CENTERLINE CLEANOUT COMPACTION. COMPACTED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE PIPE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE • CONCRETE WALK DUCTILE IRON DETAIL DIAMETER EAST. FASTING EACH ELECTRICAL CONDUIT BURIED ELEVATION EDGE OF PAVEMENT ELECTRICAL VAULT EXISTING FACE OF CURB FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED GRADE GUY ANCHOR GUY P011 GAS VALVE INVERT ELEVATION ILLUMINATION IRRIGATION UGHT JUNCTION BOX UNEAL FEET LIGHT STANDARD LEFT MANHOLE MINIMUM MONITOR WELL NORTH, NORTHING NOT TO SCALE OPTIC FIBER OVERHEAD POWER, POWER UNE UTILITYS /PURVEYORS STORM DRAINAGE: PCC, PCCP PIV PL PL POC PM PP PP /TR PTL PS PS PSO PSE PV PVC PWT, PW'T R RCC RT R/W 5 SO 501111 SS SSCO SSMH SSS STA STD S/W 1, BT, UGT TC TC, TOC T.E.S.C. TD TMH TP TR TrSB TsSV TS TT TYP TW W w/ WM 1001 WV WSDOT 0 CITY OF TUKWILA RYAN LARSON (206) 433 -0179 SANITARY SEWER: METRO (206) 296 -7815 WATER: NATURAL GAS, POWER TELEPHONE: CITY OF TUKWILA MIKE CUSICK (206) 433 -0179 PUGET SOUND ENERGY (PSE) DOUG VULKEY 1- 888 -CALL -PSE PILCHUCK - CONST. (206) 418 -4234 OIEST (206) 264 -4600 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PAVEMENT) POST INDICATOR VALVE PLANTER POWER POLE PATH LIGHT POINT OF CONNECTION POWER METER POWER P011 POWER P011 WTH TRANSFORMER POWER P011 W/ TRANS & LIGHT COMBINED SEWER PARKING SPACE PIPE STORM DRAINAGE PUGET SOUND ENERGY POWER VAULT POLY VINYL CHLORIDE PAVEMENT RADIUS ROLLED CONCRETE CURB RIGHT RIGHT OF WAY SOUTH STORM DRAIN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SANITARY SDE SEWER STATION STANDARD SIDEWALK TELEPHONE. BURED TEL UNDERGROUND TEL TELEPHONE CONDUIT TOP OF CURB TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL TELEPHONE DUCT TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE POLE TELEPHONE RISER TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL VAULT TELEPHONE SENTRY TELEPHONE VAULT TYPICAL TOP OF WALL WATER. WATER UNE. WEST WITH WATER METER WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE. WATER VAULT WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AT 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 \ F ti 0 v VICINITY MAP NTS CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT OTY OF TUKWILA TO ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING UTIUTY INSPECTIONS OTY OF TUKWILA GREG VILLANUENA (206) 433 -0179 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /1O 1/22/C MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE v THE AUSTIN 'COMPANY ,.at.1LTANO•0EONNER3 • EM..EER:. SCTR1kTt*: NOf1IMNBEIf BOON 11000 N19.NTIdWI ELM. BETE 000 IFATTIL WA 116110•4204 20so4-a00 HNOINAHIncers r 1 CALL 48HOM S BEFORE p y1_ YOU DIG \ Wl! -QL F Consulting Engine': 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia SleroA AIRPORT MANAGE: Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING F ELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT LEI4END AND ABBREVATIUN:; 1. LEly ", °T "14.1(/4' c .. 4,, A 41W7 ` fip /O M \l ' DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CADFILENo CHECKED BY: RA DRAWING NO. C -01 DATE: DATE SCALE: PLOTTED DATE d TIME JAN. 21, 2002 114630 AM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000 - 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- LEGEND.DVG XREFS, LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK-MS, VIC-MAP, GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA MUNICIPAL CODE. IT SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT TO CORRECT ANY ERROR. OMISSION, OR VARIATION FROM THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN THESE PLANS. 2. APPROVAL OF THIS ROAD, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION (E.G., DOMESTIC WATER CONVEYANCE. SEWER CONVEYANCE. GAS. ELECTRICAL. ETC.). 3. BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION OR DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY, A PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING MUST BE HELD BETWEEN THE OTY OF TUKWILA, THE APPLICANT, AND THE APPLICANT'S CONSTRUCTION REPRESENTATIVE. 4. A COPY OF THESE APPROVED PLANS MUST BE ON THE JOB SITE WHENEVER CONSTRUCTION IS IN PROGRESS. 5. CONSTRUCTION NOISE SHALL BE LIMITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF TUKWILA MUNICIPAL COOE (SECTION &22); NORMALLY, THIS IS 7A.M. TO 10 P.M. 6. IT SHALL BE THE APPLICANT'S /CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN ALL CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS NECESSARY BEFORE INITIATING OFF -SITE WORK WITHIN THE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY. 7. ALL UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY. & ALL ROADWAY SUBCRADE SHALL BE BACKFILLED AND COMPACTED TO 95 PERCENT DENSITY (WSDOT 2-06.3). 9. OPEN CUTTING OF EXISTING ROADWAYS IS NOT ALLOWED. UNLESS SPEDFICALLY APPROVED BY OTY OF TUKWILA AND NOTED ON THESE APPROVED PLANS. ANY OPEN CUT SHALL BE RESTORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OTY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS, SAFETY DEVICES, PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT. FLAMERS, AND ANY OTHER NEEDED ACTIONS TO PROTECT THE LIFE, HEALTH, AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC, AND TO PROTECT PROPERTY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACTOR. ANY WORK IITHIN THE TRAVELED RIGHT -OF -WAY THAT MAY INTERRUPT NORMAL TRAFFIC FLOW SHALL REQUIRE AT LEAST ONE FLAMER FOR EACH LANE OF TRAFFIC AFFECTED. SECTION 1- 07.23. 'TRAFFIC CONTROL,' OF THE *SOOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SHALL APPLY IN ITS ENTIRETY. 11. MAINTAIN POWER TO PUMP STATION, COORDINATE ANY DISRUPTIONS IN SERVICE TO PUMP STATION WITH AIRPORT ENGINEER. EXTENDED SERVICE DISRUPTIONS SHALL BE MITIGATED WITH CONTRACTOR SUPPLIED AUXILIARY PUMP SYSTEM. CITY OF TUKWILA LAND - ALTERING REQUIREMENTS PERMIT - STANDARD REQUIREMENTS IN ADDITIONAL TO ANY DISCRETIONARY CONDITIONS PLACED ON THE APPLICANT, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OF EVERY LAND- ALTERING PERMIT: 1. NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR WITHIN THE 48 -HOUR PERIOD PRIOR TO COMMENTING ANY LAND- ALTERING ACTIVITY. 2. NOTIFY THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR OF THE COMPLETION OF ANY CONTROL MEASURES WITHIN 48 HOURS AFTER THEIR INSTALLATION. 3. OBTAIN PERMISSION IN WRITING FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR PRIOR TO MODIFYING THE CONTROL PLAN. 4. INSTALL ALL CONTROL MEASURES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 5. MAINTAIN AU. ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, STORMWATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, CONTROL MEASURES, AND OTHER FAOUTIES AS IDENTIFIED IN THE CONTROL PLAN. 6. REPAIR ANY SILTATION OR EROSION DAMAGES TO ADJOINING SURFACES AND DRAINAGE FAOLITIES RESULTING FROM THE LANDALTERING ACTIVITIES. 7. INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION CONTROL MEASURES AT LEAST ONCE EACH WEEK AND /OR AS INDICATED ON THE APPROVED INSPECTION SCHEDULE REQUIRED BY TMC 16.54.230A AND MAKE NEEDED REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. & KEEP A COPY OF THE CONTROL PLAN ON -SITE. 9. THE PERLOTTEE SHALL AT ALL TIMES PROTECT SENSITIVE AREAS. THEIR BUFFERS, AND IMPROVEMENTS TO ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTIES AND PUBLIC RIGHTS -OF -WAY OR EASEMENTS FROM DAMAGE DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. THE PERMITTEE SHALL RESTORE TO THE STANDARDS 1N EFFECT AT THE TIME OF THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT SENSITIVE AREAS, THEIR BUFFERS. AND PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE PERMITTEE'S OPERATIONS EROSION /SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES 1. APPROVAL OF THE EROSION CONTROL (ESC) PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN APPROVAL OF PERMANENT ROAD 014 DRAINAGE DESIGN ( E.G., SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROADS, PIPES, RESTRICTORS, CHANNELS, RETENTION FACILITIES, UTILITIES. ETC.). 2. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ESC PLANS, AND THE CONSTRUCTION. MAINTENANCE,REPLACEMENT AND UPGRADING OF THESE ESC FACILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/ESC SUPERVISOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. 3. THE BOUNDARIES OF THE CLEARING LIMITS SHOWN ON THE TESC PLAN SHALL BE CLEARLY FLAGGED BY A CONTINUOUS LENGTH OF SURVEY (0R FENONG. IF REQUIRED) PRIOR TO ' CONSTRUCTION. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. NO DISTURBANCE BEYOND THE FLAGGED CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE PERMITTED. THE CLEARING LIMITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE APPUCANT/ESC SUPERVISOR FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. THE ESC FACILITIES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL CLEARING AND GRADING SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE TRANSPORT OF SEDMINIMIMENIZET D. TO SURFACE WATERS. DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES IS 5. THE ESC FAOUTIES SHOWN ON THE TESC PLAN ARE THE MINIMUM REOUIREMENTS FOR ANTICIPATED SITE CONDITIONS. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD, THESE ESC FACILITIES SHALL BE UPGRADED. AS NEEDED. FOR UNEXPECTED STORM EVENTS AND MODIFIED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGING SITE CONDITIONS (E.G., ADDITIONAL SUMP PUMPS, RELOCATION OF DITCHES AND SILT FENCES, ETC.). 6. THE ESC FADUTIES SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY BY THE APPLICANT /ESC SUPERVISOR AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE CONTINUED PROPER FUNCTIONING. WRITTEN RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT OF WEEKLY REVIEWS OF THE ESC FAOUTIES DURING THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1 TO APRIL 30) AND OF MONTHLY RENEWS DURING THE DRY SEASON (MAY 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30). 7. ANY AREAS OF EXPOSED SOILS, INCLUDING ROADWAY EMBANKMENTS, THAT WILL NOT BE DISTURBED FOR 2 DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON AND 7 DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY STABILIZED WITH THE APPROVED ESC METHODS (E.G.. SEEDING. MULCHING PLASTIC COVERING, ETC.). & ANY AREA NEEDING ESC MEASURES THAT 00 NOT REQUIRE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION SHALL BE ADDRESSED WITHIN 15 DAYS. 9. THE ESC FAOUTIES ON INACTIVE SITES SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM OF ONCE A MONTH OR WITHIN THE 48 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT. 10. AT NO TIME SHALL MORE THAN 1 -FOOT OF SEDIMENT BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN A CATCH BASIN. ALL CATCH BASINS AND CONVEYANCE UNES SHALL BE CLEANED PRIOR TO PAVING. THE CLEANING OPERATION SHALL NOT FLUSH SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER INTO THE DOWNSTREAM SYSTEM. 11. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AN ROADS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE BEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ADDITIONAL MEASURES. SUCH AS WASH PADS, MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE THAT ALL PAVED ARE KEPT CLEAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. 12. ANY PERMANENT FLOW CONTROL FACIUTY USED AS A TEMPORARY SETTLING BASIN SHALL BE MODIFIED WITH THE NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND SHALL PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORAGE CAPAOTY. IF THE FACIUTY IS TO FUNCTION ULTIMATELY AS AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM. THE TEMPORARY FACILITY MUST BE GRADED SO THAT THE BOTTOM AND SIDES ARE AT LEAST 3 FEET ABOVE THE FINAL GRADE OF THE PERMANENT FACIUTY. 13. WHERE STRAW MULCH FOR TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED, IT STALL BE APPLIED AT AT A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 2 TO 3 INCHES. 14. PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON (OCTOBER 1), ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY WHICH ONES CAN BE SEEDED IN PREPARATION FOR THE WINTER RAINS. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED WITHIN 1 WEEK OF THE BEGINNING OF THE WET SEASON. A SKETCH MAP OF THOSE AREAS TO BE SEEDED AND THOSE AREAS TO REMAIN UNCOVERED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OTY OF TUKWILA INSPECTOR. THE OTY INSPECTOR CAN REQUIRE SEEDING OF ADDITIONAL AREAS IN ORDER TO PROTECT SURFACE WATERS. ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR DRAINAGE FACILITIES. • RECOMMENDED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. 2. FLAG OR FENCE CLEARING LIMITS. 3. POST NOTICE OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SIGN WITH NAME AND PHONE NUMBER OF ESC SUPERVISOR. 4. INSTALL CATCH BASIN PROTECTION. S. GRADE AND INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) IF REOUIRED. 6. INSTALL PERIMETER PROTECTION (SILT FENCE. BRUSH BARRIER, ETC.). 7. CONSTRUCT SEDIMENT PONDS AND TRAPS. IF REQUIRED. 8. GRADE AND STABILIZE CONSTRUCTION ROADS. 9. CONSTRUCT SURFACE WATER CONTROLS (INTERCEPTOR DIKES. PIPE SLOPE DRAINS, ETC.) SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH CLEARING AND GRADING FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. 10. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH OTY OF TUKWILA STANDARDS AND MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. RELOCATE SURFACE WATER CONTROLS AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES OR INSTALL NEW MEASURES SO THAT AS SITE CONDITIONS CHANGE THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL IS ALWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ON OF TUKWILA EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL STANDARDS. 12. COVER AU. AREAS THAT WILL BE UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 7 DAYS DURING THE DRY SEASON OR 2 DAYS DURING THE WET SEASON WITH STRAW, WOOD FIBER MULCH, COMPOST. PLASTIC SHEETING, OR EQUIVALENT. 13. STABILIZE ALL AREAS THAT REACH FINAL GRADE WITHIN 7 DAYS. 14. SEED 011 SOD ANY AREAS TO REMAIN UNWORKED FOR MORE THAN 30 DAYS. 15. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, ALL DISTURBED AREAS MUST BE STABILZED AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REMOVED IF APPROPRIATE. STRUCTURAL NOTE THESE PLANS ARE APPROVED FOR STANDARD ROAD AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ONLY. PLANS FOR STRUCTURES SUCH AS BRIDGES, VAULTS, AND RETAINING WALLS REQUIRE A SEPARATE REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OTY OF TUKWILA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/( DATE �c� nTHE AUSTIN � e COMPANY V.YIiAMQ•D V PIERS • E.:WEB*•fO.�TN rung MOON 1000 RIEATf.IOIML O.O. IEIE 000 ZEE RA 91011-00. • CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG • 1- 803-424-5555 , Effil Consulting Enginee, 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81.. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEI Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT NLTTE. DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -0.2 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY U CO w PLOTTED DATE 6 TIME JAN. 21, 2002 114905 AM W 2 2 CO O m 0 0 ■ 7 •■ •■ IVO . .111111111P g • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■■■ ■ ■ ■• B MARK ■■■ ■ ■■ ■■■■■■■ ■ ■■■■■m■ ■■■■oci■ fl 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 30 60 120 240 1 inch - 60 IL HERZ ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS THE AUSTIN - COMPANY r!S••T • OM AIM • E3ONEE30 •3,23413.3733,35 NORMISEOT IE'0011 MOO En xrnjw4LELw,1UIEaoo MAME WA 0lM -1704 CALL 48 HOIRS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 J APPROVED 1/22/0 DATE Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick R,3noud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FH.D SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT • CIVIL INDEX PLAN 1 DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJE DATE: DATE SCALE: I Ae- aulrrN PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE N0. CAOFILENO DRAWING NO. C -0.3 UPDATED BY c LJ W PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 2002 11 :52 :18 AM FILE PATH & NAME X:\101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \ DESIGN \KCIA- OI.- SP.DWG C -3.1 f i C -4.1 C -5.1 C -6.1 .. narau[r% veligit*Wity-SliES,WkiiirmiSkiw No 5i YARCINAI ivCI SOUMI ._ ----- /7- I� / /r•� ffffff PI t TRANSFORMER PAD EAST MARGINAL N. • ff 04tH Q...._ ----- 1I•t L _ — 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 so 60 120 240 t ndt - 60 IL HERZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 1/22/( DATE THE AUSTIN la COMPANY cow R.TANTR• DE■+YER9 •EWSMEER4 •raRETM r.TUR3 IIOIRIIIIEOT FECICOI 113CO3 M 0 9►MT1011RL OM BUTE WO GEATILE MA 9e 111•4204 vemllumaineara C J.. �L 448yfHO S� W Of E YOU UN 1-800- 424-5555 , fiiiil Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT CIVIL INDEX PLAN 2 I WINS 01/01/01 DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE: I AS—SHOWN DRAWING NO. C -0.4 UPDATED BY PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 2002 FILE PATH & NAME 01000 - 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- TESC.DWG LYTS Cr wax 11 li u � � �r� • I EAST MARGINAL �JAY1 —� ■�1��---p . _ :.,:; • / �� SOUTH / �/r _ — ::":IS >: - r- va a �— ` _ _ _ — � �• — — \-101 HN CdR 111 =,I ly- SOLOING RESTR 110g (1•67 7“. unv 7r • xx xx Its 1 ► ► 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 LEGEND INLET PROTECTION SEE DETAIL AI qigr V*i•1wAti y1N � 1!7s'. ` CONSTRUCTION ENTERANCE SEE DETAIL Q x x SILT FENCE Q x x x SEE DETAIL glp LIMITS OF WORK GRAPHIC SCALE 0 20 40 10 100 1 itch 4 40 11. HORZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/C MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN e COMPANY MOW R.T4R4.OMM RS• E,.?MEERE•z71.0,.Ir.TOM NORaMEET REOON IMO ertaelAT101 ara BUTE 300 W& /MAME. WA.6M-A0G4 106OH000 wI'e»m K • ' 1 Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. / BEFORE 48 HOBS , B OFIC IOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 l APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEI Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT TEMP( TRARY ER( ): ,I( )N AND ::EDIMENTATI(TN ( :1)NTR()L PLAN I. LEiyN. \' 61 4syz4"6y C it w „tore font co, ... ,..».. ( ... . DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CADFILDO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. C -1.1 DATE: DATE SCALE: ....... .. N -3 a CL UPDATED BY Q 0 JAN. 21, 2002 11:56:26 AM FILE PATH 1 NAME u ti Q U Ls Ls LJ L7 M 0 Q U 0 m cl- ct 0 • 0 0 m iff ate- :::::mmara._- - - -�_ -- ' • —1 ir................:11111.111111111111Milimereallal I • 4.11111•Idiill.' 1111__.___11111 IN".■111711111: t I ■ P- %E CM ner 1 1 marQO ® L.T.. ® ®T TCS 1 # • • 3vmr • emir 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 LE-GEM) ® INLET PROTECTION LTA rs r.S SW SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE SEE DETAIL LIMITS OF WORK GRAPHIC SCALE 0 20 t0 80 160 1 iiN • b IL FICRZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/( DATE ('r THE AUSTIN J .COMPANY oWILTA.S•DE9MEA9• EIAWEO4• ASTAOr.RW3 PCSM•6133f PECION ,DO . CU D DITERN L.E. ELM. CUTE 300 SEATTLE WA Y6101-421SI was Isseueseas CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 firlli Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia St.rcrl AIRPORT MANAGEI Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT TEMP( RAM' ER( »K )N AND ::EDIMENTATI( )N (;()NTP.()L PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFRENO DRAWING NO. C -1.2 J • Co PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY 0 a 0 ti ti c FILE PATH 1 NAME u _W Q Z N 0 NC OD Y CO act CO XREFS: LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK-MS, °11411illl R =25' MIN. 1' TO B' s _• / QUARRY SPACES AS REQUIRED 100' MIN. EXCEPT MAY BE REDUCED TO 50' MIN. FOR SITES WITH LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF EXPOSED 5011. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL STAKES CATCH BASIN FILTER FABRIC, MIRAFI 100X OR EQUAL NTS 3' MAX. 2' :2' WOOD STAKES ALTER FABRIC STAPLED TO STAKES 0 6' O.C. WITH 1/2' MIN. LENGTH STAPLES GRAVEL BACKFILL FOR DRAINS BURIED FILTER FABRIC CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN SILT BARRIER DETAIL NTS 15' MIN. PROVIDE FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS / EGRESS AREA ,q• DIRECTIONS FOR USE: • REMOVE DRAIN CRATE • INSERT FILTER • REPLACE GRATE TO HOLD IN POSITION SPECIFICATIONS: • FILTERS MIN. 3 FEET DEEP • CONSTRUCTED OF WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE • ALL SEAMS DOUBLE- STITCHED • PERMEABRITY- LOCAL. PER MINUTE PER SOUARE FOOT • REUSEABLE OR THROW -AWAY MAINTENANCE: • REMOVE WHEN FILLED TO HALF -WAY MARK (USE FRONT - LOADER OR OTHER EQUIPMENT FOR REMOVAL) • CLEAN AND RE -USE, OR REPLACE # 16„ .415c:::::-&:_*1 .\ .2X ,,\ \‘\\; .0". • ,/,:,,,, ,<:''S kill CATCH BASIN (PROTECTION) INSERT FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL, MIRAFI 100X OR EQUAL USE STAPLES OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE A NTS 2%2%14 GA. WELDED WIRE PROJECT SIT FABRIC OR EQUAL u STEEL FENCE I POSTS 0 41'0.C.(TYP.) BURY FILTER FABRIC IN TRENCH FILLED WITH GRAVEL BACK - FILL FOR DRAINS SECTION A -A NOTE: UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT OR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE OWNER, THE FILTER FABRIC FENCE SHALL BE REMOVED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR. FILTER FABRIC FENCE DETAIL NTS 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER j10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 1/22/C DATE c� f1 THE AUSTIN �• COMPANY rasa aTUn7 • DEN NER7 • ¢e!NWEAt • m1dTel n. OM IIOROWIEGF REOCN tol =CO WIERN yx:WA WO. e 700 eFAT ICE �A 0100-1704 CALL 48 HOBS BffOAE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 ti>•r�i� Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANACEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENCINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT TEMP( )RARY ER( ):',1()N AND `,EDIMENTATION 1.)NTP•()L DETAIL:; DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -1.3 UPDATED BY PLOTTED DATE 6 TIME JAN. 21, 2002 1202:39 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13-14) \DESIGN \KCIA- DEM0.014 8' BUS STOP E-=C CO '1' SIGN rS9 • • Br CN • 8 0 FROTH T I�IKISI�` AS LINE- ANL) . ETER TrSB LIMITS OF WORK E£b NEW HANGAR N 1 U co I I fa I I Q1 I 1 I I0 1 I I0 I I 0 I 8 I 1 I "=====-4,,,,f1„„ yI 6 SAW LIMIT PAVE RE UT. OF ENT VAL ° GATE CONTROL KEYPAD I EXI I 101111 61113 AIN -UNK FENCE \MATCHU WING C -2.5 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.3 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND N./ v/ vv v v' v v v v v v AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL CONC. PAVEMENT REMOVAL GRAPHIC LE S� C 0 10 20 40 ID 1 inch • 2011 HOW 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 DEMOLITION NOTES: PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORY DRAIN LINES. PROTECT EXISTING METRO SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND MANHOLES. O3 COORDINATE AND CONSTRUCT TELEPHONE SERVICE RELOCATION. SEE ELEC. SHEETS. O REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. BASE, AND CONDUIT AS NEEDED. SEE ELEC. DEY0 SHEET 0 REMOVE 48' STORY DRAIN LINE COORDINATE MATH AIRPORT ENGINEERS. NEW STORM DRAIN LINE AS SHOWN ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. © COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION MATH AIRPORT ENONEER. SEE ELEC. SHEETS 0 PROTECT EXISTING TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND VAULTS. 9 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. 9 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE, POST AND BASE. SEE ARCH. SITE PLAN. 10 ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE TO WATER PETER, COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF TUKMALA WATER DEPT. Il ABANDON GAS LINE AND METER. COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. PUMP STATION, HEADWALL AND GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. NOT USED EXISTING BILLBOARD TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. REMOVE FOUNDATION AS NEEDED. 19 NOT USED ® PROTECT EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL POLE. HANDHOLE, SIGNAL CONTROL CABINETS A140 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 21 REMOVE EXIST GUARD RAIL 22 REMOVE AND ABANDON CATCH BASIN AND STORY DRAIN PIPE. 0 4D 15 0 m 0 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0. DATE �c� r THE AUSTIN ,A .COMPANY COMPANY 1-40(011.0.117F • DEPotER9•..? FEU•room RUR1 NOAD1AEAF FECION IWO INTERNATIONAL FLAX BUM 3:0 BEATTI.B WA. WAW -001 CALL 48 HMS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1-803-424 -5555. J LIMO" Consulting Engineer. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622-81J APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEI KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASI*1GTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT na DEMi?LITIt IN PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAw DRAWN BY: REB PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFIL.ENO CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE DRAWING NO. C -2.1 0 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY PLOTTED DATE 6 TIME JAN. 21. 2002 12:04:22 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000 - 101400 \101183 (KC1A LOTS I3 -I4) \DESIGN \KCIA- DEMO.D JG c ("4 04 0 -PROTE-eT AS LAE- ANL) ETER cc A r, L'N 7,77-7-IT'il_4cH, / 4 it / °c.c. ABAN. EV _ CC X X c Eeb -ASPHALT-- / / / / , / 1 / / / I / 1 / / / / / • / f/1.71 11 1 / / / / / / 1/ 1 / / / / 11 / / \\\\\\\\\ B-7 -- - - --- -- - - - _ .... _ ._ _ _., _ - .7: _______ ,.. ___ '■; 1 il immilimia a IIRMIIIII:14i711 fTlitk't-1-;21111: - --.7:11----1‘'--.).1 44mwaY" ' -- i If -k r-- I 1 ; 0 1 _ 0 ! 1 : I „ iz. ; ,,.i.i i alai :. ,„ ,tc:, ,. . A VE. j_EC;x0UND P° r METER /W 111LI\NAT 111A1111i 3- TRA4ORNERS PP W/ ON \ 1 NEW HANGAR --------------------------------------- 4-4---- —N CUARDR.1L ra mrp , _ / \ 1 \ 6-CC f 8-8 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C-0.3 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL CONC. PAVEMENT REMOVAL 90% REVIEW 12-26-01 DEMOLITION NOTES: @PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN LINES. mPRANOTECLTEXISTING METRO SANITARY SEWER LINES. AND MANHOLES 0 COORDINATE AND CONSTRUCT TELEPHONE SERVICE RELOCATION. SEE ELEC. SHEETS. 0 REMOVE EXISTING UGHT POLE. BASE, AND CONDUIT AS NEEDED. SEE ELEC. DEMO SHEET 0 REMOVE 48- STORM DRAIN LINE COORDINATE VIITH AIRPORT ENGINEERS. NEW STORM DRAIN LINE AS SHOW ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. 0 COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION WITH AIRPORT ENGINEER. 0 PSEREOTEEICETC. DaSHSETIENTGS TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND VAULTS. 8 REMOVE COSTING CONCRETE CURB. REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE. POST AND BASE. SEE ARCH. SITE PLAN. 0 ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE TO WATER METER, COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA WATER DEPT. 0 ABANDON GAS LINE AND METER. COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. PUMP STATION. HEADWALL AND GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWAUC. NOT USED EXISTING BILLBOARD TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. REMOVE FOUNDATION AS NEEDED. @ NOT USED @ PROTECT EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL POLE, HANDHOLE, SIGNAL CONTROL CABINETS AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL @ REMOVE EXIST GUARD RAIL @ REMOVE AND ABANDON CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PIPE. 4D 0 1/22/0 MARK DATE THE AUSTIN COMPANY r ATANTS•DEITINNEIN•ENAINEENSH-aNewirTule MR11441E137 IEOION ING0 NTEFNATIDNAL BOO. BUTE X0 MAME. WA. Stell-4206 206-674-0TO ww011wwwlhom -ASPHALT.- CHAIN-UNK FENCE 5 CALL 48 HOB BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 APPROVED Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-81. BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE_TER KC. AIRPORT RECORQ51 PLUG AND ABANDON SD LINE WEST. REMOVE AS REQUIRED - REMOVE 94 LF± 15” SD ti Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT TNT O•A • DEM( )N PLAN LIMITS OF WORK_ PLUG AND ABANDON E WEST. EPIRMS-EW 61132 1122 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10.20 40 so L- fl 1 kb • 20 IL RAZ SCALE:. DRAWING NO. C-2.2 u N 0 0- UPDATED BY r- 0 a JAN. 21 2002 12:06 :31 PM FILE PATH B NAME X: \101000-101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14> \DESIGN \KCIA- DEMO.DWG W S Q z m co SAWCUT_ - -_ _ _- -- LIMITS OF PAVEMEN -REMOVAL_ fq- r 4c 4c FOUND 3" BRAS$ OSk - - -- STAMPED "THE BOEING 'ECIMPANY PROPERTY CORNER" I. 0.1' S. •F PROPERTY - CORNER _ BENCHMARK •TO 18" ELEV.18.87 OVERHEAD BILLBOARD -------- ----- - - - - -- 1-= 6 LARB_rwCRE —_ 11 11 XII 0 - { { 4 4 'WINK : pro PLUG AND ABANDON SD LINE TO WEST NEW HANGAR 08 -9 0 4 PLUG AND ABANDON SD LINE TO WEST — 1 -.ASPHALT- Ls REMOVE EXIST. MANHOLE COVER LOWER DOWN 3' AND PROVIDE W/ SOLID COVER. H -20 LOADING U , BUILT NG RESTRICTION LINE (PER K.C. AIRPORT RECORDS) 1 r/ 1 1 LIMITS OF IYIY OFA ENO 13/21 ME3 EE3 EMI EZE SEE CEE GEE ESE EIS EEO EEO 5y UATCHUNE - WING C -2. GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.3 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND v v ./ vvvv v v v v v vvv St' vvv • AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL CONC. PAVEMENT REMOVAL GRAPHIC ;CAI" 10 20 E I iih • 20 IL HORZ 90% REVIEW DEMOLITION NOTl -26 -01 O 0 10 11 m 0 19 21 22 PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN LINES. PROTECT EXISTING METRO SANITARY SEMER LINES. AND uANHOIES COORDINATE AND CONSTRUCT TELEPHONE SERVICE RELOCATION. SEE ELEC. SHEETS. REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. BASE, AND CONDUIT AS NEEDED. SEE ELEC. DEMO SHEET REMOVE 4r STORM DRAIN LINE COORDINATE WITH AIRPORT ENGINEERS. NEW STORM DRAIN LINE AS SHOWN ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION 111TH AIRPORT ENGINEER. SEE ELEC. SHEETS PROTECT EXISTING TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND VAULTS. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN UNK FENCE, POST AND BASE. SEE ARCH. 9TE PLAN. ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE TO WATER METER, COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA WATER DEPT. ABANDON GAS LINE AND METER, COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. PUMP STATION, HEADWALL AND GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. NOT USED EXISTING BILLBOARD TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. REMOVE FOUNDATION AS NEEDED. NOT USED PROTECT EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL POLE, HANDHOIE, SIGNAL CONTROL CABINETS AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL REMOVE EXIST GUARD RAIL REMOVE AND ABANDON CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PIPE. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0. DATE JcJ r THE AUSTIN ,h• COMPANY IMLTANTS•DEe...IEAl•EM?.EER3. G.3T1wrT(.S NDiRIM®T IP70M IWO 11797MRONAL WO. BALE MP BEATI E MA 1111•1•4704 CALL 48 HODS ' BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 8C0-424-5555 Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813 APPROVED Cynthia Stalwart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEI KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FHA SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT DEMI XLITII ?N PLAN 1 OPIRLI MAMAS DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN 8Y: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DARE 1 SCALE: PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CAORLENO DRAWING NO. C -2.3 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY X 0 0 d JAN. 21, 2002 12:08:53 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13- 14)\DESIGN \KCIA- DEMO.DWG 11111- 1- 111- 1 - 1 111111111111111x 1Tr 1 SB 1I1I111n LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL •■• EAST _ _ MARGINAL WAY - UT`__" SOUTH ° N 22'31'55" W - —� (MON LINE) m 1 4, —o- BENCHMARM 'TP 19' ELEV 18.25 M U CD NEW HANGAR PLUG AND ABANDON SD LINE LIMITS OF 3 WORK PP Wr POWER -_ SPEED LIMIT SIGN GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.3 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND �vvvvvv• • v v v v v •v v v s./ S./ • AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL CONC. PAVEMENT REMOVAL SCALE ID 20 L - ASPHALT- W 5 REMOVE EXISTING ELECTRICAL CONDUIT AT PROPERTY LINE AND CAP LINE 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 DEMOLITION NOTES: I PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN LINES. 2 PROTECT EXISTING METRO SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND MANHOLES O COORDINATE AND CONSTRUCT TELEPHONE SERVICE RELOCATION. SEE ELEC. SHEETS. O REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE, BASE, AND CONDUIT AS NEEDED. SEE ELEC. OEM0 SHEET OS REUOVE 48' STORM DRAIN LINE COORDINATE WITH AIRPORT ENGINEERS. NEW STORM DRAIN LINE AS SHOWN ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANS. © COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION MATH AIRPORT ENGINEER. SEE ELEC. SHEETS 0 PROTECT EXISTING TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND VAULTS. 8 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. 9 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN UNK FENCE, POST AND BASE: SEE ARCH. SITE PLAN. 10 ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE TO WATER METER, COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA WATER DEPT. 11 ABANDON GAS LINE AND METER. COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. PUMP STATION, HEADWALL AND GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. NOT USED EXISTING BILLBOARD TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. REMOVE FOUNDATION AS NEEDED. 19 NOT USED Zp PROTECT EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL POLE, HANDHOLE, SIGNAL CONTROL CABINETS AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 21 REMOVE EXIST GUARD RAIL 22 REMOVE AND ABANDON CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PIPE. 15 0 m m 8 MARK ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 (v REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS THE AUSTIN Is COMPANY rWkolTMA .• DESWWeS• DANCERS• aliVID Nfte MDRIM®T MOM IOW WEiNATx7Nh. IS .%O, m WO 1WATILE WA W1N--42OWt • CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU GIG ` 1- 800 -424 -5555 J APPROVED M OFA 1/22/: DATE HAI Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINES KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT OF )RK CORNER OF AS—PHA CHLUNE - DRAWING C -2.5N 28.42.1 ( —� GRASS JBox GRAPHIC LE DEMt.!LITIt IN PLAN eD 1 ildl . 20 R Hoe DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: RE8 CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DARE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -2.4 0 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY a U CC JAN. 21, 2002 12:12:22 PM FILE PATH E. NAME W CO 2 O 0 X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS I3 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- DEMD.DWG Ut X 3 Oc X U 3 X U Y Y 0, _7 CO CoN-Ra AO o i� 1 e 0 r r I t -StORY III I ' i EXISfl 8" CPS JAIN -LINK FENCE a Q GRASS 9 D 0 0 0 0 SAWCUT. LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL 0 NOT DISTURB G OIL /DATER RS/ JBOx (PER K.0 AIRPORT RECORDS) \ D Twr OFA LIMITS OF WORK MATCHUNE - SEE DRAWINGS C -2.3 AND C -2.4 rr Ia SAWCUT. LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVAL \\\\\\\\\\\ N 28'42'1 / N af- a•a h GRASS 0 0 TO BE RELOCATED j 0 0 • GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.3 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND vvvvvv v • vvvvvv AC PAVEMENT REMOVAL CONC. PAVEMENT REMOVAL GRAPHIC :CiAl"10 20 40 E co I icw • 20 IL RORZ 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 DEMOLITION NOTES: 8 PROTECT EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN LINES. 2 PROTECT EXISTING METRO SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND MANHOLES. O3 COORDINATE AND CONSTRUCT TELEPHONE SERVICE RELOCATION. SEE ELEC. SHEETS. O REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE. BASE. AND CONDUIT AS NEEDED. SEE ELEC. DEMO SHEET OS REMOVE 48- STORM DRAIN UNE COORDINATE WITH AIRPORT ENGINEERS. NEW STORM DRAIN UNE AS SHOWN ON GRADING MO DRAINAGE PLANS. © COORDINATE REMOVAL AND RELOCATION OF POWER TO EXISTING PUMP STATION PATH AIRPORT ENGINEER. O7SEE ELEC. SHEETS PROTECT EXISTING TELEPHONE CONDUITS AND VAULTS. 8 REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. 9 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE. POST AND BASE. SEE ARCH. SITE PLAN. 10 ABANDON EXISTING WATER LINE TO WATER METER, COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF TUKWILA WATER DEPT. 11 ABANDON GAS LINE AND METER, COORDINATE WITH PUGET SOUND ENERGY. PUMP STATION. HEADWALL AND GUARD RAIL TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT. EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. REMOVE EXISTING LANDSCAPING. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK. NOT USED EXISTING BILLBOARD TO BE REMOVED BY OTHERS. REMOVE FOUNDATION AS NEEDED. 0 19 NOT USED ® PROTECT EXISTING VEHICLE SIGNAL POLE, HANDHOLE, SIGNAL CONTROL CABINETS AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 21 REMOVE EXIST GUARD RAIL 22 REMOVE AND ABANDON CATCH BASIN AND STORM DRAIN PIPE. m 15 0 0 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER R10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 1/22/( DATE THE AUSTIN t1 COMPANY ate lubl73• DEN NER9• WortERE G00T0IRpR3 NORM/033T MOON 1000 MH I ELM. BUM 300 B:ATT .E E W& WA 11310.204 200-674ib0 ew1.11olinme r CALL 48 HODS BORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424-5555 D21E Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewed AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT DEMI !LITII !N PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: RE8 CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -2.5 UPDATED BY PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 20D2 1216 FILE PATH 6 NAME O5 CO TE =17 86 i m - - _ _ _ III i IE =15.16 ,,5 -_11� (1rnsi0 k 5) 1F-15 25 (T2 •'S -5) 2^ MATCH EXISTING CURBIW, u • •DS D '1, ▪ kdttA--Hasri C CURB & �'° - - GUTTER � I - _- _ -_- 1j =5 -so - -' - _ - _LEiR� 5 _IYA4 o'�q ?.,a �e•e�" • L1 �{. �; 'a O� �.ed�>•_ - \a.- - - - - - te: 81)5 5TOP SIGN SOUTH TE ■14.70 1E -moo (10'CP -E k W) IE -9.40 (15'CP -S) 10 -9.30 (21 "CP -N) C _ 15 -CP Pip m C8 TYPE 1 TE ■14.28 1E -11.13 (10'CP -W) LIMITS OF -\ WORK 0 f�I N\o \o CB TYPE TE =1559 IE =13 C9 (6'-w) iE =12.99 (ICI'CP -E) PROPERTY Li FENCE CORNER 1.5' SE'11 OF PROPERTY CORNER T.SB W tND CURB E_ E -1 if =1 IA 9( 190 S59H 18.25 E- .50 (GTR OF 0941 I N CB /22 TYP RIM =16.35 IE =13.85 1.8* S =1.07: 113 0 SEE STORM DRAINAGE DETAIL DRAWING HANGAR .1 FF EL. = 16.75 IE =13. WAITS OF PAVEMENT 4; RI =l .. It, =10.4• 60 LF 1 CB %5 RIM =15. IE =10.11 1: EXIST. ADJUST -- GRADE, H -20 CB /8 TYPE I RIM =14.75 IE =12.55 9 TYPE I -13.96 -N) E ■12.31 (8' 18 -P50 iR) ® ® REMOVE ' REOOYE EAS J _ GATE CONTROL :T 3 YPAD FENCE CORNER 1.7 0E11 & 0.2' NE5.1 OF PROPERTY CORNER GATE " KEYPAD OBI ems ale MI N9-1196 FENCE 1 t:2' :' 90 %R% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. GRAPHIC 0 10 20 40 g0 1 itdt • 20 R. HERZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/C MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE c� r- THE AUSTIN / 1 COMPANY 0 LTYR4•DESS.WFAB •EM!WEUI..LN81Mr.TOMS NORTHWEST PE0011 1000 MTHiMTIOWL ELM. EWE 300 ,1FATRE WA 1111.4104 wwellunewlhcon f lift Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. Cu 48 H BE OIL YW DIG 1-800 -444 -5555 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE: Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT (�RADIN(4 AND DRAINAuE PLAN 1. LE /4 , �'� °T 3ALVi G40 t .0. _� °`' gPF. mm 1 l a telan 1 DESIGNED 8Y: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN 8Y: REF! CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. C -3.1 DATE: DATE SCALE REFS: LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK -HS, KCIAxSV, KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIAXSP, - _ MAT EXISTING CURB & TTER Ir _tg AB3-? iRs ° °• TE= 1B.i6�- all iE =1 }54 (r2` S -E -- � I _' - °�J- DN I F eE =tA.76 12 "ADS -5) �i7 - .1C °IJ a9 (•2 "ADS -5) _ IE =t} }6 (t2 "AD -N) irSB - -o , -ZQ- - '�= 1t2�A.5 rvII IE.t }} 12"ADS -N) a''12 "ADS PSD - -II m CB 06 I n► a iE ZB Dr _ -- ° 2 "ADS P5p 6-CC C -1349 (ZTT195 PSD�r,° IE -t3. }9 (12 "ADS t2-ADS PSD I r • LIMITS OF e,ABAN. EV '..lo fr 2 "ADS 0 3'e tND CURB 01.17 97 1 -14.92 (17-ADS- • 11.14.82 (12.40S -N CONNECT TO EXI DIA VETRO SSVH 48-0 CONC. PIPE E -15.25 I1 .4.50 (CTR 01 CHANNEL) SEE DETAIL SHEE .13.77 (BADS -5) ;1.15.02 (6'CP -1) CB TYPE 1 .17.38 .14.68 (12 "50S -w) B' 500S =0,5 TELE. VAULT 4 0445 g.IP -E) / / RIM='15.59 / -}-- CROWN 11.19.15 04 I=10.44 / i /a / / /.5 / / /ry - / / 60 IF 12- SD O S€¢51� o/ 1 ° / / HANGAR 2 FF EL. = 15.75 ;.... s« HALT 5V CUARDRA 31 a1 C8 j3 TYPE (I /44 / RI1=15.66 1 / IE =10.14 CROWN ELE9 -15.22 e4 CB /6 RIM =15 C8 112 TYPE I RIM =15.40 0.5%( =12.40 - ASPHALT -. 8 TE -15.81 1E -13.51 (6"CP -N) 114, 1 U 1 Z W Ois% cz c XISTING E I IFIED F E DETAIL CHAIN_ 1.06X .s FENCE STORM ir12.2A33 33.3: 1E -12.45 A0. DRAWING IE =11.01 SEE EXPANDED DETAIL SHEET CU ,".10, 7,11 5'17i/1 CB /23 TYPE 11 48'0 RIM =15.2 IE =9.41 121W) IE= 9.74 8? (E) 54 REMOVE 94 IFt 15. 50 8 TYPE I •13.96 PLUG ANp A8AND011 5D UNE 1fi(ST. REMOVE AS REQUIRED EXi6T. 36• SD UNE �� CB J12-, TYPE . 48•E W/9000>1 TURNED ELBOW1 1 R01.15.03t -E•8.36t, 15• EX N ) E =8.61, 12• (S) T • T 1 '1• TING 8• CP CT TO 1016 CB 12 5D 0 S =0.50% 4442& iVOC gY•a .14.75 yF G1 (rim EMS MI5,4 ' -PLUG ANDwABANDON L SD UNE WEST. CB TYPE 2 •' T('13.68 1'2.53 (CTR OF CHANNEL) TO VERIFY PIPE 905 CH 5 518L5 - ADJUST INSTALL SOUD U0. •JAB Lai �V1f QTyi 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE ONL INDEX PLAN, DRATMNC C -0.1 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 1W 1 :x:11 • 20 IL ItORZ 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 510 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/C DATE 2j n THE AUSTIN �e COMPANY JNIITANT9• DE3303Ee1• EWOWEad• 004.0RW NORIIAMST REOOI 113000 M9eNT101YL ELM. ELITE 900 MAME, WA 91320-034 waereueiname I' CALL 48 Ham E FORE YOU DIG 1- 800 - 424-5555 , Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT I;RADING AND DPAINAI.E PLAN I teem mA,m DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE: 1 T•..,n• PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. GAOFILENO DRAWING NO. C -3.2 0 0 LJ J 0 a m 0 0 Q U w it PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 2002 12 :22 :12 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \ DESIGN \KCIA- GD.DWG co m a ■E =1305 (8A•C5- IE =1285 (19.-E'- i(.12.60 118.CP- 0 rte__ 1 (12'AD5 -_E) 1- (171tDS -S) I (12'AD5 -N) ADS PSD ez ?CB TYPE 79a�__ ADS P =117.64 (12 -ADS- - aA - LIMITS OF SD PSD �e C8 1 "E a ((2 ADS-N) _ 2'ADS PSO -7- 8 ADS PSD _ __ _•ter CB TYPE I _ - TE =1B.04 CB TYPE i =- - -- I(2.)509 (12.805 -5 & 9) TE*18.08 - - = IE•14,98 YADS-N) _ - - 1E .iS43- fL2ADSZ S) CB TYPE TE =18 03 1E -1503 (12- ADS-S) PSD CB TYPE 1, 21,(12-ADS-9) 12 ADS PSD 4•,e uIf j IE.13 91 (12 -A0 =_ W) _.,r►s__ 2ADSP5D® LIMITS OF FOUR() 3' BRA55 D15Ir - - _ -�°2 gWORK n • 'ME BOEING .... � � _ _ - - _ _ - J•�_ _ - _ k:A • - SSMH (ABANDONED) •~ � Oi PR• • N F - _ BENCHU� - _ - - - ELEV -i8 OVERHEAD BILLBOARD •S -W) C8 TYPE TE =17.41 (E =14.04 CTR OF CH ELECTRIC METERS SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS 4 HANGAR 3 FF EL. = 15.75 0 S =1.O% C8 124 11 48'0 RIM =15.70 IE 6' =10.88 - (va.-,,0 CP -9) IE 16.83 IE =17.01 CB /14 TYPE n 48.0 RtM;15.15 IE 8' =10.15 (E) IE 6' =10.28 (W) C8 115 TYPE 1 RIM =15.16 IE =12.16 --ASPHALT-. sRx ca 0 a -1- T. y T S 1 ) ADJUST MANHOLE TO GRADE - _Raz um. - Vat - _--- �5 = -.1c= = CP PSD 0.88% CB p6. TYK O- AB" RIM =15.60 IE Ir=11,13601v0 EXIST. IE -9.71 A 1 c . , TYPE n -48' s ZRNM =15.37 - = 10.951 - EXIST. SD MANHOLE " °4 o. 4' DIA SOUR T(=15.28 p� IE -10.08 (8•CP -w) (REMOVE) 10 -9.78 (5•0P -E) IE.9.28 .(CTR OF N -S CHANNEL) IE =9.78 (8= SO -w) CB TYPE 1 -14.3E- 10 -11.70 (a- CP- xi) '°, ADJUST MANMCLE TO GRADE s„ C EXIST. 10" 5D UNE 0 CP PSD _ - ExtST SD LINE j7��-j - -ilTS - WASH PAD ° VALVE VAIA '. J EVI 90% REVIEW 12 -2V -U1 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. 0 t0 20 GRAPHIC SC LE w so 16CI • 20 IL HORI ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/( DATE eTHE AUSTIN ITC COMPANY cpcsmTANT9 • DEpW Q! • DreaTERE • fpE}RI Mon NORTHWEST MOON MOO 14113 TILE *4.1L10. 04 NO WATTLE MA iliiO4 BUI)_DIN-&RESTRICTION LINE (PER K.C. T RECORDS).6 9 RIDGE UNE OF CHNNEL) ADJUST A RIY TO GRAIL - INSRALL WATERTIGHT LOCIONG LID ' - CONCRETE WASH PAD AREA ✓ CALL 48 HODS BEFORE YOU DIG • 1- 800-424 -5555 APPROVED Ql CO N till _/ 0.57. 61 '•'I CB TYPE 1 . 11 TE -14.83 TMV y E.1E 3 (12 CP -E • .2., 1 C8 /17 TYPE I 1 4, RIM =15.83 FENCE CORNER 0.2' ■4 0 l IE=11.5t FIELD VERIFY NE'LY OF PROPERTY 511 CONNECT TO EXIST. UNE ryI .y yl N \ /��'�� 4b ac I _ �;�TAW® , _ -_ 1 .ln L e ® ran ®6T7a telt.1111 MCI Me CBI 166111111 Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81. Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE! Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENCINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT t;RADINt; AND DRAINA(;E PLAN I OPDm x/9193 DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE: 1' -20• PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -3.3 0 0. U H 0 0. 0 0. OP CS cm JAN. 21, 2002 1224:32 PM W = O- W z 0 Y oa W z CO _ mot° ��I�I�I�111111111111-W1111111111111111 7. 605 -5) 2-/IQs-N) CO TYPE I, ('18./1.01,1( °°° .12'ADS -S) 1[.14.11 11((12.-AM---10- - IE.1J91 (12-ADS- N) SE_ c -_ -- ° CB TYPE I TE =16.02 • t S) 1(.14.22 (12' ADS -N - - - - _ - - C6? TYPE I TEUL96_ IE =14.36 (12 OATS OF wORX SUMI, lE - C9 TYPE iE =1316 60 90 (BA) T_• 615 (.13 JO (1 DS -W e'CP_N) IE =T550 (BADS -5) =13.10 (18'CP -S) INS ��-- e51 3 8-ADS- - EAST MARGINAL _ I d CB TYPE 1 7(.18.16 1(.1575 WADS- N) 1(.15 60 (8. 455 -N) 1(.15 45 (8'455 -E) I � 11111I1lI11111111I11111-I11111� >•. Tr SB . v4 ma ' Jul ;DS PSD CB TYPE TE =18.00 ( t 2'ADS -S) 12-ADS PSD WAYSOUTH d (MONUMENT LINE) cop. •eb N 22'31'55- W y . $4- a = rAA05 PSD OMITS OF WORK I TNT._ .1e.6 ( -15.05 (12'455 -N) i - - 12*AOS PSD q�♦ HANGAR 4 FF EL. = 15.75 _ r y CB TYPE 1 TE -16.85 � 1E =12.65 (8'SE) °° . 2 _ PP Wj PoWER- . -_'._ & TL L6 DM. SPEED OMIT SIGN - CB TYPE 1 TEA 16.52 09 (6 -CP -E) ..ASPHALT -. CB /19 TYPE II -48' (=11.41 W E? - Pig WASH VALVE 4 JE1) RIM TO CRAM WATERT1CHT 110 E WASH A CB TYPE 1 11.15.36 1(.11.61 (8 "CP -NW) IE -11.41 (10'CP -SE) CB /22 TYPE I RIM =15.33 IE =12.19 OMITS OF WORK IN TE•1E E.14.30 (8•CP. .66X • CORNER 1.2' w. CHL1NE - SEE DRINtitt'33. a 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRA1wNG IDENTIFICATION. GRAPHIC :Ci\l" E 0 10 20 W 80 I Nd • 20 IL HoRZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 1110 1422/G MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE - THE AUSTIN � ` 'COMPANY abSarAIR$•DEN. E!!•EIONEER!•rGMJTw Y.n)R3 NONTIIMBT NEON 1000 317E NATgWAL CUD. BUTE 300 SEATTLE WA 1.110-4204 • wawAr � %i�rfia Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81, / CALL48IflES ■ BEFOFE MI CIO 1-800-424-5555 f APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANACEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT t;RADINt; AND DRAINA( ;E PLAN 1. LEI V v of .ATy79 t �J�Cp a C. oar' , . tom. TON- DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: KB CAD FILE No.CADRLENO CHECKED BY: RA. DRAWING NO. C -3.4 DATE: SCALE: 31 W d I )(REFS. LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK;MS, KCIAxSV, KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIAxSP, • • • --...� y ',E.,o 1s (CT OF CHANNEL) 1 ADJUST RIM TO GRAD_ ` NI N'? RIDGE LINE 90% REVIEW 2 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: . `� ADJUST• j•AME TO FINISHED 7 1 "I '1. - - - -GRACIE. "1 AG1E. S8N0 -C-OVER- - - - - - - H -20 4. 'INC W/L�OCKING COVER. I J P / ... s'', I Ir - - - - - C `� .,2.a IE =11.0' _, _ (PER K.C. ••' • - _ _ : T RECORDS) INSRALL WATERTIGHT LOCKING LO �- PAD AREA WASH �5v • ,z 'CIF' FILE . �A `' SEE STORM RAINAa • ° SEE CIML INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. GRAPHIC SC LE 0 10 20 40 60 CB 18 TYPE I DETAIL DRAWING RIM =14.75 °' \ 1 IE=12.55 ( 1 -3.6 g '� . U ., b a T 3 96 / / E =,231 (8 -- -N) • �� ,4/ _ - -__ ■40 O. `"�` "'REMOVE TO ' ^° JKn ° o 1 t•O�h �K °,I ; �/ �'• cl f_TI iE =1 8I f0.�� T otA / / O + N 0.7% Q• ° 0.9x (PLOT SCALE' 'O EXISTING MANHaE- __ _ _ _21' CP PSD ' 6 •- . _ PSD 'A� GATE CONTROL J� r r - - _ _ @' _ '�4 KEYPAD a ! - - / s -1- . - - REDONE L7(ISTNG 18 CP - - _Q\._ IE =,T.SJ (,2 CP - , �I CB 1i7 TYPE I '1 ? RIM =15.83 �o• IER 0.2. ''•' I IE =1151 FIELD VERIFY °I tOPERir I ++ CONNECT TO EXIST. - °I -- �4ATCHLIN` - ,a c 10 Q4 - J DRAWINGS C-2.3 AND C-2.4 q , ^!��• - I Ti �cS� tl - u o REBECCAB = _ _ #• 0. - _ -- 1 2,CP PS - -- - - - ) - SAW -CUT LINE y - =2 = -- - -__ -- i ,(�{',. ''r FENCE CORNER ire ;. - K - - •,•- ' - J. Er .2 SE'LY - MAT.' LINE = `� �1 • YVING - . 0.2' NE'lY OF ,T • R• o I PLOTTED DATE d TIME Q_ Tv o ni ■I I - _ °° iI _ � KEY•AJ• ° , .• q. 'P•� i ? F7 : ;• 4.. '.1. - 6. ' cPgROPERivr���CCOfRNER Ivb �� ^' " "<* r.L& ' ,./T =i i:'(�AIN -LINK FENCE 3 ° ' t9 L! s t E•S.4 x- L,s�,�` ..sF t.... ' ° C�°�14 TYPE �8'� 11 RIM °t .953 MEET D MATCH �e ''�' E =586, t2' ) EXIS G PAVEMENT E -536. If 1) E °5.61, 15 _ _ I L -� c� `� I� 1 rENCE C A. Shcy • O) PRO -ERTY CORNER' 1 El \ t _ _ N 28'42'13' W_'381 58 "`°' ii z �� Li , MEET AND MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT q try ^' t '•y e . tKo •° SCAM W/ LADDE' tJ TOP OF WEST SPILL WALL =10. 11 TOP OF EAST SPILL WALL =9 IE =B.At (CTR OF CHANNE) IE =e,n (8-PVC- ) ( IE =8.06 (CONCRETE TROUGH ) _ NOTE SPILL WALL ON NORTH SIDE OF STRUCT RE 1I•�� SOUTH OF CONCRETE TR• GH �, BOx 150 LF 13•'91) ' ea / ° Off° OIL /WATER SEPARATOR (.°91 TE= 15�NECT TO '�'.{�/ nC Lj � .p`'.a /� EXIST. SO PIPE i _ _ - - / 0 S 0.5% 1 ° I • ° ' , n / L 4 1 bl I / o .0 n '4 NEW A.C. PAVEMENT t` n 1 • LIMITS OF + WORK �pss• Li FILE PATH 6 NAME X: \101000 - 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS I3 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- GD.DWG _ ° , , INLET 10 \ 03 '' �� MEET AND MATCH ,� RIM =14.00 (. / EXIS NG PAVEMENT 4, L' rpEXIST. CB 1 11 INLET 0 IE =12.53 4T ° O� TYPE IJ 7E =t3.8J '� F{ R9,1.13. LI IE.T76 ( IE =11.78 To`' Q4 �+ °'• 1 °.. LIGHT TO j 8 PJ ,,,.t, Iia,wS'3 %wia3 i...;.-a 'r:�'^./. a'"�} iL`.» !ew"dd Y.'.:z`7 CaY':'�i 1 was a was WORK - LIMITS OF ,. WORK ,. I itch - 20 IL HOR2 'J.., 'a, J J, • °g J �Jeo '•, • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 1/22/0. MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN �e COMPANY racRRTAMTD •OENJME•S•EIMWEW•MIKTTNIr.TtR9 NERIM9EHf R_0 KAL 10000 00110 ATIO ELM. . SUITE 300 lowwireadnamw / CALL 4810 , FORE YOU DIG N, MO- 424 -5555 k •• f I Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81: APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF - Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE, KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT W E z m 0 KCIA ( ;PADIN(; AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1. LEI* \,O oT 3L4744. ACA /0311 CO DESIGNED 8Y: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: CAD FILE NO. CAOFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. /� -/�•C `V_ 3 5'1 JOB II r, m�� DATE: DATE SCALE: 1' -20' 1 WOW aIRI 1 'CTB' FILE .I PLO1 VIEW I )(REFS, LE MKUHL, 769TBLK-44S, KCIAxSV KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIAxSP, a a ��, a / 1\ 1 6o , R n1 „ L „ .,r „I RIM =15;'313 RIM=15.40 IE 90% REVIEW _ 12 -26 01 GENERAL NOTES: IE =9.76 /, / -� 1 0.5% =12.40 -ASPHALT- I ,a /1 / i I �/ - �s� - _ __ 6g 1 RIDGE LINE ° ° : _ ' •s; - _ _ - CHAIN- 1�1 1.06% �e .INK FENCE �5�2� C7� e a_ IV11 SEE C INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. GRAPHIC SCALE ° ' t0 20 40 PLOT SCALE 'UPDATED BY1 REBECCAB '1 l se 1 °° / I BUILDING RESTRICTI i .', 0- DN LINE PER K.C. P Q--- EC-b - 1!:4s�Q __ l PLOTTED DATE 6 TIME N / 'so��'" CB #23 TYPE II 48"0 - - v 165I - FILE PATH B NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- WTROLTY- EXPNED.DWG EXISTING MANHOLE <, 1 REMOVE 94 LF± 15" SD s'� ��' --- -- ____ - -- _ PLUG ANE REMOVE EX[SIING 18' CP \I LF- 12" -SDZ�S x.86% ______________ '�.9 t IH SD LINE V 9 EXIST. 36" SD LINE �9° �Vv - - - - _; .- �. I; �36`C - .i8„ 12L °p4n..�C._d:�, -- CI TYPE Z Jam TE =13.68 a5 -- Ef.C6 --- -' -- =_-_ - - - -- t (--N __ T2' ~SD ©S =D.SI;% CB #27 TYPE II 48 "0 I E 2.53 (GTR OF CH .l. ° I I � NFB TO VERIFY _ ue ),�11' 's -'` o �I�'��i oI'j�p 1�° 2� • Ip35 CP PS L 12 SD @ S =0.50% I W /90'DOWN TURNED ELBOW; i PC)SSIBLE 3 0L RIM 1 1 , / 18' LAR =15.03± ADJUST R 8" REMbVE ISTING 8 CP . I ,y - t i t co " -L STING CB . Il �N ,y „ �q) IE =8.366±, 15 (EX (N)) �v INSTALLS IE =8.61, 12" (S) I "d' - la n. NOtu _ _ I ' ' � I 5� „ 1 '`°` 'A "� SL.4 � � ► � I !• CONNECT EXIST. SDC . . t - e - ___ - - - - - - - _ - -- - - - -- - ----- - - -- - -- U U V T V <3. ��, �/ ee E =14.75 '9o- o ; 12" �J 2 QO X92 0 CB #24 TYPE 48"0 5LF 12 SD (TYP) =8.65 (8 "CP -E) ( RIM =1 .95± / / E =8.05 (GTR OF 1 HAN EL) IE =5.86, 12" E) /' C1: TYPE I # „ T =14.44 CB 26 TYPE II 72"0 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER X10 1/22/( DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS (JI .THE AUSTIN cZZ�ti • COMPANY „�,, - 1>� ) 4 OIL WATER SEPARATOR IE -5.36, ,0 17 =11.04 (6"PVC -SE) FLOW SPLITTER IE =5.61, 15 =- - • - ' SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.8 's STORM STRUCTURE / 8" WALLS ' v ' #816 -� -CPS p'� RIM 14.86± °s °°°°" «=� SO° ' �• ,/ "� / WEST WALL IS IRON �O �,' TE =15.29 o/ =7.29 (24"CP -S) Q�' IE= .29 (12 "cP -E) �' v' IE =7. (18 "CP -N) ``\� . ��� // PRESETTLEMENT VAULT = RIM =14.96± GRATES W/ FLOWING AT • PER "VORTECHNICS" 12" IE -8.30, 15" W,S IE =8.63 12 (N) - ( ) 12" OUTLET MANIFOLD MODEL #2000 „ IE =8.72, 10" (E) IE =8.40 12" S 0.5% RIM -14.7± ., () Quo REMOVE, REPAIR PUMP WALL IE =8.60, 12" (W,S) .COQ, STORM FILTER PER Co , I/' CALL 48HOURS 1 BEFORE YOU DIG 180424-5565 / k • f f Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia sl.wcrt AIRPORT MANAGE IE =3.29 (18"CP-S) IE =1.99 (36 "CP "STORMWATER MANAGEMENT" ,/ .., , � 4 "CP Rick TUd AIRPORT ENGINEF IE =1.79 (48 -E, Aer 8x16 PRECAST STORMFILTER r �m IE =4.69 (189•N) KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT a _ o KCIA �' �j� Br. 6 "PVC PSD 6 (SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.7) � �� R Ae CB #25 T *E 148 "0 .' A'� ,B # 11 INLET RIM -14.7± INLET TE =13.83 IE =5.92, 12" (SW, rLET TE =13.77 , IE =11.83 (6 "PVC -NW) -13.64 ?� ' IE =12.39 (6 "PVC -S) u IE =12.82 (6 "CP -NW) 9 ps IE= PIQ978 (6 "PVC -N) �o 3 A !9 r TL1P.M DRAINAGE DETAIL >,. LEIy .° 6 ? "�Gy :' iii , c � _�. / DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE N0. CADFILEN'0 CHECKED BY: RJI. DRAWING NO. C -3.6 = m DATE: DATE - >, �`sn '?> . _' n. 1 Mm uim.m 1 0 a LL UPDATED BY PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 21, 2002 12:43:06 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000 - 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- SD- DT.DWG W CO O U O. 0 \ \ EXQST. CONC. WALL EXIST. 48'0 CONC. PIPE TO `@E REMOVED • EXIST. 2'x2' HATCH OPENING CONSTRUCT NEW CONC. HEAD WALL DEIN- OL SAWCUT, SANDBLAST AND /OR PRESSURE WASH EXIST. CONC WALL AND FLOOR. EKE aft. AMAMI PIPE ZONE BACKFILL PER WSDOT SOT. SPEC. 7- 08.3(3) TREATMENT 1. STEEL SPIRAL RIB STORM SEWER PIPE 0.064 IN. TH. 36 IN. DIAI. TREATMENT 1, ALUMINUM SPIRAL RIB STORM SEWER PIPE 0.105' IN. TH. 36 IN. DIAL. PER WSDOT STD. SPEC. 9 -05. STEPS COMPACTED SUBGRADE PPE BEDIr DETAL • GRAVEL BACKFILL F PIPE ZONE BEDDING PER WSDOT SOT. SPEC. 9- 03.12(3). 0 WATERTIGHT COUPLING BANDS (TYP.) DETAL/SECTION PRE FABRICATED CUP ELBOW BACKFILL ELBOW SECTION WITH CONTROL DENSITY FILL. CAST -IN -PLACE CONC. SLAB 61N THICK. TYPE E COUPLING BAND PER WSDOT STD PLAN B -13 AS NEEDED MANHOLE RING AND COVER TYPE 1, PER WSDOT STD PLAN 8 -25 CAST RING IN CONC. 24'0 CUP RISER SECTION GIP RISSF DETAL NH STEPS 0 12' OC MATCH EXISTING 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER X10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0 DATE I1•HE AUSTIN � cZ / o COMPANY coNNOLONTS•DES.ENS•ONNEENS ...MOM MOO NQRIM®T maw /DOD TOEFINA.E. O.O. A RITE 3o0 REATILE NA A 96M -4204 •' CALL 48 HON , EEFONE YOU DIG ` 1- 800 - 424-5555 Him Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622-812 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING F B. D SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT sTUIRM DPAINAI;E DETAIL DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: R DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -3.7 UPDATED BY JAN. 21, 2002 12:38:21 PM FILE PATH B NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- UTL- DT.DWG XREFS: LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK +MS, R1Y =14.86 O.F. 11.72 12 RISER 12' TEE SECTKN W/C EANOUT ORIFICE= 6A 8' alWT (FYP) STEPS/LADDER ROUND. SOLO LOCKING LO NARKED 'DRAW TO WATER WUALITY FAOUTY 15' FLOW SPUTTER SECTION A -A SCALE: 1' -2' (FOR MORE INFORMATION SEE KCRS DWG NOS. 2 -005. 2 -006. 2 -022. 2-02.3) IE =6.30. 15' OUTLET IE =8.30 • 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 0 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/C DATE �THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .aw.TA.R • DEIPAN.3 • Er±ECON • MatTIn r. ruK NwTL1aBT Row =CO Meau7K ML BLTa SATE MO SEATTLE WA a.ea+A4 ax -oaa -D watroalnam CALL 48 lialiS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800- 424-5555 sil•iiia Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT STORM DRAINAI4E DETAILS DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CAOFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: I> DRAWING NO. C -3.8 JOB q JOB NAME FILE PATH B NAME PLOTTED DATE P. TIME UPDATED BY PLOT SCALE 'CTB' FILE PLOT VIEW 101183 KCIA X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA - UTL- DT.DWG JAN. 21, 2002 12:39:02 PM REBECCAB 1 =1 XREFS: LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK -MS, X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA - UTL- DT.DWG GENERAL NOTES I.) S1O10F11ER BY SIONMQR RARACIIU11, Pnt1LARL OREGoi (103 -740 -3791) i.) ALL SIOBFIIERS REDLINE REGLLAR IAMTEMAMCE. REFER TO OPERAIO NO RANIEMAMO QIOELIKS TOR .E1Ali 1) PRECAST COME YAW TO BT. COGITACICO N ACCOR0NCE UN ASIR Mt 4.) WI AAO OITLE1 RPM 10 BE SPECF(O 8T OGRES AND PR0IDEO BY COIMACT01. 1) AMR- ROATATp BALLAST TO 8E SPECi(D 8T BONER BALLAST TO RE SET A& 7) YAIAI. BALLAST MAIERALS TO 6E PRO1DCO In CONTRACTOR 6) PRECAST STORIRLIER EOIAPPEO Rim IODOIWTS AT ALI 7)11/0.11117 LOCATOR. CORKS AYAUBLE NCR 0ECRID. NECTAR REELECTS OESOM WENT O7T. ACTUAL war MENTO S NO CCORC RA1IOI PROOUCION SMOP ORAMIG i PRECAST COMCAER� /. 1 t OUTLET PPE (SEE NOTE 4) 4 da 0100LWT (TIP) TEST ALTERNATE CUTLET PPE (EE Rn1E 6) a 3-31f OAlldo RATE DOORS O" 01AE1 PPE (EE MOTE 4) BALLAST (SEE LD1E 5) a d OD01011 (119) r01 ALIERRA1E 11111 PPE (SEE NOTE 6) I LO' TRANSFER PPE (EE ROTE A) `i l / y •L IL P61 BRR`iCID" iURWV. •uI1.�IBD1a�•— OIIIIYIR�aIRIaiRilC a Al*. lIPi II oegrARcroU wag" I � �A�� R�,, (1111 iRLa•F16 10111 FELL• CARTROCE TAT OUTLE BAY INLET BAY r TIE, PPE (SEE MOTE 4) 8'x16' / 8'x16' PRECAST STORMFILTER"- PLAN VIEW 4 SCALE N.T.S. Weft BERING LO 3-SxS ammo RATE DOORS 1RAFTIC MAW LA L A A `ROR SPREADER (1Y% BAFFLE WALL (TYP) ��0����V�'a�1F•i ?I�I�I�It7��! WOWOWIKOV 111 111111 I?111•iiisiii�r��i �rRi1•IiiRn1� 1pPlv- I pI'.i ll Oar. WE (8T 00ER5) PPE NANF00 (11P) ENERPr OeSPA101 (T0) 8'x16' / 8'x16' PRECAST STORMFILTER'- SECTION VIEW SCALE N.T.S. UPSTREAM STORMFILTERi1 8' X 16' PRECAST STORMFILTER' DATA _K`� , • l V d • 4 1,61t4 • < , F 1:D ^ Rath Mak 411 lati Adak BT ° •i1 ��1 MOM a -clPll (PRi.LINP B!i"FRf mRiEF•Ri iKi:Ri li�RA INRiFi/ (( AMU ROOD OR R. RIM b.) •'.e iatrednitlft �: 1 OR 0411003 RWRO \\ 4 • l.. •l IIRR1m INR4E611124nINT4SIB mirt.py lint,„ 4-10--vaa 401---wwilweam, ETWR4,LIMPnan=GS11MG_ "I1•RIMi"L RUT PR. IT t-0Mt•AR lee 14, 4 OUTLET BAY ell I p��j�, Aft Aft Aft fI//6W1,[Je Aft Aft ,/} IIOLR E Ms we,t�Er�LS1�R weay,GXX weir: Gxer wet -L1Pi ii! 4Nis Tai: G' U9 • a " /-1 < • �.- 1 0100LWT (TIP) TEST ALTERNATE CUTLET PPE (EE Rn1E 6) a 3-31f OAlldo RATE DOORS O" 01AE1 PPE (EE MOTE 4) BALLAST (SEE LD1E 5) a d OD01011 (119) r01 ALIERRA1E 11111 PPE (SEE NOTE 6) I LO' TRANSFER PPE (EE ROTE A) `i l / y •L IL P61 BRR`iCID" iURWV. •uI1.�IBD1a�•— OIIIIYIR�aIRIaiRilC a Al*. lIPi II oegrARcroU wag" I � �A�� R�,, (1111 iRLa•F16 10111 FELL• CARTROCE TAT OUTLE BAY INLET BAY r TIE, PPE (SEE MOTE 4) 8'x16' / 8'x16' PRECAST STORMFILTER"- PLAN VIEW 4 SCALE N.T.S. Weft BERING LO 3-SxS ammo RATE DOORS 1RAFTIC MAW LA L A A `ROR SPREADER (1Y% BAFFLE WALL (TYP) ��0����V�'a�1F•i ?I�I�I�It7��! WOWOWIKOV 111 111111 I?111•iiisiii�r��i �rRi1•IiiRn1� 1pPlv- I pI'.i ll Oar. WE (8T 00ER5) PPE NANF00 (11P) ENERPr OeSPA101 (T0) 8'x16' / 8'x16' PRECAST STORMFILTER'- SECTION VIEW SCALE N.T.S. UPSTREAM STORMFILTERi1 8' X 16' PRECAST STORMFILTER' DATA _K`� 111301 NM aMNT ILO. WO 1,61t4 OQRN WO RY.11T New 1.41 LIk4 PON Ila. (14) • /A 1 • A • AMU ROOD OR R. RIM b.) •'.e ODOR ORERq MOOR p ao 1 OR 0411003 RWRO Obi 10R1110LR1 - M ROM A4043 l.. 144444 net I DR/LE. 110 1. OR 'I A i• RUT PR. IT t-0Mt•AR lee 14, rap* aurae "ONO IC TWIN NM NPR N U9 ART-11401•0. L.p,_�' q• U110O T1RI/YD But R.6 .1 a -T- 1oltLVaaa RtaAR1O011 •RR- 1100.44444 1RNM1 ` Rpr Mama 00110 RR( 601 _ _ Tr ,0A1 N • 1N RBe1� f 11010/•00a @ISO! The QJL PAIM7 M IMAM M UM.IVS. M 8.701.677 01:=1 B.S. 7ON= NUMB TONY DOWNSTREAM STORMFILTERT1' 8' X 16' PRECAST STORMFILTER' DATA _K`� 111301 NM aMNT ILO. WO 1,61t4 ....... (.m 1 • , R MA MOO 0 MAR ROW fret f 4444 ODOR 010w6 tt•OPa! Oda OaRa1REAS - NC RORK DRRLC 110 1. OR •1 10 1.• gamma 1466m149 �� Obi (Ra4Er I.A l.. R.TpRA Wan0 .6A64RU LC TRIrIO RUT PR. IT AN ,r wax 10/.0 DAFT A ART-11401•0. L.p,_�' • ou44.1 R•. 101 _ iL• a -T- 1oltLVaaa RtaAR1O011 90% VI 12 RE-26 —o1 EW 6 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/0: MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE cj 'THE AUSTIN �I COMPANY AIMLTAMT3•00441D9• EW4KERA•914104' TORS 101111AW11EOOR 11000 04.111A.W. BOO. BATE SRO MAMA WA.RRFiAR CALL 48 HO(flS EEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 J alp Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -813 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON. LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT STORM DRAINA(4E DETAILS DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN 8Y: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DME PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADTILENO DRAWING NO. C -3.9 ep• �� iE =15.86 ` CB TYPE I g, _ _ - _ m n. ` 12 -ADS -v k S) ( tADS t5 �, 2 cc- N _ _ „ ° ( 1E-t5.25 02-ADS-S) ' 0 a _ _ - E =,5 zD (u AD5 -N) 1 -2' 45' RENO CONNECT TO EXIST i -8' 1- THRUST BLOCK 2 "E°S °P -5D �0,,, - _ - _ METRO SS LINE Ir 1 ..° i ., �e cc r I cc- �— -'---%--:,- - - - _ _ IE = 6.84 111 d (R/ - - (1:::.=.7.z _ BUS SIOP:- °."c^. ®S �t=u'`�'.. I DS...TPSD - �Li7R4 14' `S.L° ' ,.t - -__- -- ' I _ B Coe '. '""', �_ -7,=-71.L------_ 1 : - - 14H � ♦♦ -r - _ _ - - _ _ _ 8' :6' REDUCER / THRUSI $L 1 « _ _ _ ■ _ r' -_ --- -_�__ -__Sf - • - -= _ 9C% REVIEW 12 -26 -0) GRAPHIC SCALE o )o m w eo t-, �- Ca i et , Ell I 1 I F (; 1 Z, 1Y 1 I,xe ' 'I LSB ®,I I -2 I, I - THRUS T,SB@ a ,E • e • TrSB® i1 v tE =t797 IE-1a.92 02.4OS151 LF 2' • N���4O SSMH =1 4.82 (12•ADS -N) 49L7< SO (C 1R OF CHANNEL) 1 • CRO w W G La 0 a i 8 1 +II a T ° , -rcax V f W it CB TYPE I- - ; ' II TE =15.59 + I ; IE =13.09 (6• -w) r�--�T I it I r III IE =12.99 (10•CP -E) i 1 EE..iT I ] + ^D II 1 Q ; HANGAR 1 _ J H EL. = 16.75 16.75 - - ; I 1 u Z 1 0, SpOi ; t V Rf01 =16.7 ; ; V Y. 6•= a ^ / I v I N IE 6'= 814(N,SE) ,;' �, 1 ; IE 4-= 8.21(E) p2 ; Cr DROP w /(b ; , 2 TE�15.51 ' / �' IE•12.6t (t2 CP -E) / J /g. / 6" St / / I 1 1. ; U RIU =16.7 n `�' I wM 1 / !9(6 h ; / / / • / IE = 9.62 / 1 :w, • 20 a 11Qti I to IE = 14.00 lE-8.30 ; 6' SS 5 =2.0% , 1 I 1 0 i1 y 00. ATER SEPARATOR ' fn. °SD .Xill �- RDA = 16.70 ,.� 3 IE 4'= 831(w) = 14.00 ;'A I 41 Li 6'S ' , ; /6 r3 I I Cr IE 4 " =8.81(E) 1 0 ; 0 S =2.0% ■ / }-.6• R // to �q I I �„ 70 LF 8' FL / I" Lf ° I l I' ■ � l . I I " I• n T FIRE HYDRANT 1- B•RUST /BLOCK 0 r` [f.�� I I 1 r ' I t 4 ASSEMBLY ti I , _ ; II 1 -B• 1 t7 ; ■ , 21 LF 8" FL II 1- THRUST : : •. f "° 1 31 1 I 1 -8':6' TEE a/ 1- THRUST BL9CKI / 1 1 / _1- - CROWN ELE 1 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE L7 f1 THE AUSTIN L, 50 COMPANY JNY ITAMf4• IEBY.Y EA!• ] MEptI.rDM810� moms NORtHA�T IC9ON 100°rn'E"�gae a BUTE '0D MIIMOKIMILMIII , I €J y c / i ['� 1 12 l! , 1 t9 I ; ' n / / 1 p# ; ; ;;8' 90 BEND / / L3 R RUST BLOCK / 1 n ( ; l I , / 1 I L� i r / ( ; ; 1 I ; / 1 / 11 / I I / / , I, / „4 / /r •� J / CAL148 HODS BEFORE YOU DIG N. }�� k • f f Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshin ton 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 r r , ; II / I {• n / ■ L ; % ■ l _� / / = 1 • I APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER / 1 F I 1 / i _ _ _ _ _ Ma -1 'T _ l , 1 ! °s • , 1 °I Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER BR , 170\, eg I I ; _ jN r -N) `� 1 ■ ,SAP P� • I ; 1 to I I / T , / ' / / �; ca TYPE , , / / E_,2.3, (8-PVC -N) , / KIN, C COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RJGY•V 1 -RV JGM11a.,� WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT La M al UTILITY PLAN I° ,e, 1 1 GATE CONTROL II _ - - _ - • ` di I9 , , KEYPAD % 1• • o , \. LEIyA.G DESIGNED BY: LAN/ PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 18'PSD /2) c_- ; - ' _'_� = =_ -_ ! / = =cl �� ; 1 1�..t - --ear- a! - I - _ - c - - ® _ - \O. ' 1 � GATE CONTROL \'Otr ; • , ,•••,. KEYPAD \ • ® c �0 •'Mx <t� d 8 �� A DRAwN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CADFlLENO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. /� / �� A •� a Pam . 0 's #fti �+ Join DME ® ®t41l MI ® ® ®® ®•.,- - - -..; It �1�I�cr® AIN -LINK FENCE SCALE: t•.iD' 1 owns a/ct/as 0 LJ J ¢ Lel 0 CO ¢ 0- CO 0 U CO OL E 0 = LD 0 LD 0 0 C.11 CO 0 U z 0 J er /7 m co - N - W 0 Oc 45' BEND CONNECT TO EXIS>'I ?UST BLOC( METRO SS LINE Ir• _ IE =6.64 C -- Pw p� r1' 1 8" ADS PSD.> 1-8 _ Qoh II c _ - _ -------- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _- 1 -8 TEE --- -r- - -_ LOCAIEANDCONNECT _______ _ _ _ _ __ /1:'x6' REDUCER / - - - _ r �C' TO EXISTING 10� WATER EV - - - 4 ST 814 Ce TYPE o E =,3.54 (12 ADS -E AIIF DOUBLE DE1E OR CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY - b = 4• TE=18.t6� - - - _ _ t1a9 O2•ADS-5) AND VAUIi P CITY OF YALA STD. PLAN *5 -11. • 1E•14.76 12•ADS -5) X=13.36 (12•ADS -N) `�T- _ -� 5 T 1y33:542(4. WE i � PSD 44 , iE -1 1�•ADS -5) m° i rE n Or _ _ - _ - •wE I - �- - :E: 1.54 fYADS -E ^" •� 1 - r• TEE•7 1 -8' 90 t2 "aDS Psp 6_CCk ,' i [. 349 (12•Ap� sL r.•]. q F Ti- e. _ _ _- - - - - cc_ 1 -�z: R ! +o E= 1.39 fANG -Ok' CONNECTION ;_ y (. T 8t t'F a.• .�;,.� R sD= _ 2•..1 $W e5. • TORTI �ANNEC �' 1 -8: (,' a - - _ _ Ga a �- - � 4ir•,,.. ,�.„ y�y7° /�T'� C �T• ��_ •� _ _ - _ _ 1- HRUST BLD,I� •1e _ _ J -� '�s4 "'�y+�� -as EI .u! '.w e/1IDi, ±T.."�' �_ , -w- Or. _ - aIL� 16 -17.97 r IE =14.92 (12•ADS1SJ IF 2 w 1E -14.82 (12.605 -N) SSUH EL .14.19, L1s ai14_� 12•ADS1S) TE a17.63 (12 "ADS N) I Itol4.23 at TYPE I' i H W10 -25 (6'6D.- Cb-TEA-17.0' 1 14- 13.82 (8"ADS-N & w) / I R OF CHANNEL) , Z 1 6.13.77 (8 A0S -S) ' 1 I 0) TE =17.41 IE'-1491 (8 "fP -S) 16.589 A 1 O 1E -49 CTB 6 -CTW3W4 I I I fit - TE -15.51 IE =12.61 (12 "CP -E) / -/ - CROWN ELE0 -15.04 1 / / 1 / 1 / II S =2.0% A VE GROUND.' ` J -808 W/ POWER METER 1, PP W/ OW 1 3- TRAN9FORMERS HANGAR 2 FF EL. = 15.75 SDUN • TE -17.28 • 1E -13.03 (6-GP-NE) 11 CB TYPE TE•17.'1 16.14.04 GAS METER 2' ELECTRIC ME SEE ELECTRI DRAWNGS I DETAILS - _ _N 22'32'06" W 259.00' CUARDRAI 41 IF 6- 0 S =2.0% 70 LF 8' FL 8. 11 1/2• BEND ST 8100( 286 II 8- FL TE -1 1 -8' 22 1 /2EEN6 -1 I- THRUST BLOCK 81 51 (6 "CP -N) 16.837 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY U IE =17.01 1- THRUST 1 CHAIN-MN FENCE LaJ 1 _EC ILIINY.T1G1i'L7LT T12ti .1.1tiU E'- AIL X I L.LAICOQ.0 I, 1) II {{^I I I sl I f Ill \, difil Elf • J r n n.5 7e•ro_F\ 1�T 1 - -CB TYPE 2 TE -13.68 ,I[-2.53 (619 OF CHANNEL) Na-A8[ TO 96865 PIPE 512E POSSIBLE 3C-TNRQUC.. 1 TWY CFA Mil WWI tail sca sma OW SEA eig•STO ® ® ®- tea® 0 9C% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SCALE 10 20 40 eo 1 4141I • 20 IL NCRZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER fl10 1/22/I DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS �c� rTi THE AUSTIN 'COMPANY mow uurtF• DEB.wFn9• EWnR13}•McSTA r•TVAII IIDRINNHT MOON 1000 NTERNATIONAL PTO. 9111E MCI SEATTLE. WA eeee-12C4 swelwomIneara CALL 48 HOIAS BEFORE ( YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 k • f f Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINE[ KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT IITILITV PLAN 1. Mkt e�ry of e44/4t4y ca . &�� /11, A �� Twat DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN 8Y: REB CAD FILE NO. CADfILENO CHECKED BY: RA DRAWING NO. C -4e2 SCALE: 1•.20. I VMS a/BNbe 1 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY JAN. 21, 2002 1234:59 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13-14) \DESI(N \KCIA- UTL,DWG EIMKUHL, KCIAxSP, 769TBLK 18' ADS P50 :a _ wa -- VI - - -III _ _IL _ lt- -a- T � - - -L -u_y Rr - -� - - _ -_tiller _ y 1 �- ---( -0_ rr - rt- -T -� - n- _ _IL �•ADi PSD'- ___� _ __ __0__11_ -'�o r -_ -ems °DS PSD c - -= le Ts; I 4, 1 >..)C (4 Au> -%1 - -8/" -5 _ _1 ` - _ u _ _ 11 - IE -13,0 24 it =1305 (1 (8 AA05 -E) WDS -) 1E =12.85 (18CP -•) - I _ r 1.12.60 - J1__1i_LL I ::iy- _ .e "ADS PSp =_ - __ -__ DOUBLE DETEC OR CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY _ AND VAULT PE CITY OF TUKWILA STD. PLAN WS -11. -F _ - -�� - , C9 TYPE I Dr -_ , TE =1809 j - - CB ivPE - _ -1514 )12.405 -5) �C9 TYPE I .7 •• 1 -B� 90 CONNECTION IE -1 }.• (12)9/0 T CCB4 PC I x+5.89 (12 "A 0/ =1 9 (2 AD - - -� 6 15 N) 2 C8 TYPE I •s ORTI�NNEC 4' 1 -8• TEE 1E -15.14 (12-505 - CONNECT T�1509 (t2 ADS -5 k N) _= _ - - -___ 1- TFIRUSTBL + ►.� EXIST. GAS - - -_ - / r _ P O E)OSTING w( - = - _ CONNECT T 4� =�' i METR033 S1U8- - 74-45r .47 T _ • _ _ _ _ sD�_ _ r 1- THRUST BLOC)( - VERIFY LOCAiIpV �;"g TYPE I or ,4 IE- 3.54 (12 ADS -E) IE= 3.49 (12•52pS -SL IE.-- 3.39 FAKE- UtP K AI e5• 1 -8' TEE k111.46", REDUCER TNRUST BLOCK E41 LF 6`01 PIPE) CB TYPE 1 TE =17.41 ((.14.04 AND SIZE W/METRO DS P=OP C8 TYPE 1 TE •18.08 1E =1498 (12•50S -N) 1E re,88-(•-2L5D S) ,CB TYPE I TE -18.03 r (=15.03 (127ADS -S) lE Y4 3-(12 ?QS -N) 7CB TYPE I TC =18.01) - 1E- L1.Z�(12' ADS -S) (.14 11 (12 A - - i =1} 911 (12.505 -W) CSC 322 SC3 133 1274 P 7.` BRASS Ddir ..... -.� - - - 1 - ',. _THE BOEING - _ t• _ 7aHl `- - .58 - - CP -- _ - - - _ - - - _ • (ABANDONED) ....... _ _ • ........ . ...., ...k75 ' 70 -e __ • - - - -- __ •OVERHEAD - - -- 6" SS (-6.99 b � 2'A(1 PSD , `i_ 1� App -pSD °tl'n 12-ADS- , 9O1e -___ MET 0 MH W1 TR OF C W 18,04 GAS METER ELECTRIC METER SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS GAS METER 04 v N V A O 0 GAS METER HANGAR 3 FF EL. = 15.75 GAS METER 6. 2 SS FL DRAIN IE (OUT) =9.67 OIL/WATER SEPARATOR GA IN GAS METER IE (IN) =9.67 2' SS F.. DRAIN 8IF1 "W 7.1 81 1/2'BENfF =1 .51 (6'CP -N) T BLOCK FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY IE -16 83' SSMH RIM =15.12 IE 4' =10.9 i i 1 -1' 90' BEND 11-- THRUST BLOCK U • 1 -1' 45' BEND 1- THRUST BL • 9LF1'W OF CHANN 'x18• VAULT _ - W LL OPENING HM H10 LOADING CONSTRUCT BELOW ND HOSE BIB ASSEMBLY ER Ott OF SEATTLE STD. PLAN j 12.1 =T ; _ _ �y Cp PSD EMI Ell-.09 JIESI BUILDING RESTRICTION UNETPER K.C. Z 4 5 10 Cp PSD - • -4 up_ ---- -� �• 4. CIA SOWN ( TE =15.28 41 IE =10.08 (8'CP -W) ul ( =9.78 (8•CP -E) °,11 IE =9.28 (CTR OF N -S CHANNEL) 101 1 1 7 CB TYPE 1 TF.14,}0_ 77 (.11.70 (8.CP -W) 0 10 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SCALE 20 40 so 1 ildl a 20 IL ROR2 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 1/22/ DATE v THE AUSTIN .COMPANY ©NS . TANTS• DE91'.YIE48•EWWwERB.arN.^TWI4T4 0 NORI044L 20011 ,)ODD M9UlONAL fiLw BUTE 300 SEATTLE WA aeriTw swalhnuolhows pCAA 1448yHflS '‘ IO G ,a 1-80O=424-5555 , Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622-81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewed AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINE, KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT CB TYPE 1 TE =14.83 IE- ti.'BS (12-CP -E) WY OEA • CSC CMS ECM BCC CCM 11121 CE3 RCN OBI ma CM ISE3 EMI 1C3 353 CCM ECU ECM EMI CMS z 01 N V 1 C1PDm 06/01/07 UTILITY PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DAIIE SCALE: r -20' PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -4.3 PLOT SCALE UPDATED BY JAN. 21, 2002 12:36.39 PM FILE PATH 6 NAME 7$9TBLK -MS, KCIAxSV, LEIMKUHL, KCIAxSP, B <DS P5p ', 'E I 03 53 (12ADS -s) 534(2•I1QS -N) 1E-13 05 (8 ADS -w) - : »u (o Aug - ) IE=1285 (18'CP -4) IE =1260 (18 "C4 -S) ,CB TYPE I TE =18.12 IE =15.12 (8 ADS -N) r 11 -15.24 (8"ACs -E) I ■1 =15.19 (8'•CS -. 11 =15.19 (8 "•9S -5) 7 SEMI IC5 T ( I 1E =18.50 iE =13,90 (8•95 -w) I TE =_.- __ IE -l330 (:p CP -N) iE _ ____; _______________l ICB 1TP - D - _ L _ ? _ _ 71 ; _ - - _ J TE=t81 _y-- -IL B T I E -15.7 \ _ _ L iT _ JI _ - -u- - - LL - ll _ _ y _ _ - Irr 8- - !! - - R - 1 r 1E=15.6 DS a -- L- 8a65pSD'' S. 2CB TYPE 1 - _ a(d TE =18011 - _A.71, (12'ADS -5) 7CB TYPE 1 1 IE =lA.t1 ATE =18.02 d ¢ =13.91 (17'ADS -w) ,4.gi Ft2�p5 -5) _ r IE =14.22 (12. ADS -N -N�' - _12'ADS PsD = 1 • • -r: sW�L tZAO, -5 PSD IYADS PSD <. , CB TYPE I r-TE =1236_ I IE =14.36 (12 A 7 , CB TYPE 1 1C =18.00 7 ,E__44..,10_(..1 2- __-1. _ 1 -2 TEE 1- THRUST, BLOCK SS CO - <°oT1i - - )- _ �__�'- -_ ®bs8 map• I EAST MARGINAL WAY -__- ------------ _ - eft- - - SOUTH _ 1 vii o -' - -4.-- TYPI ,a.bs� IE =15.05 (12'A 1- 8'90'BEND ma as Gm EMI difir T 18.04 ash GAS METER 1.. DRAIN GAS METER GAS METER HANGAR 4 FF EL. = 15.75 fl - CB TYPE 1 TE =16.85 1E =12.65 (8' SE) 12 ADS PSO pp-W7 Ae SPEED uur 167 IE (IN) =9.67 2' SS FL DRAIN -4.5 81F1.W p / r, FIRE HYDRANT 1 -1' 90' BEND 1- THRUST BLOCK Tss 1 -1' 45' BEND 1- THRUST BE \-9LF1.W H ' :18' VAULT W FULL OPENING HIN H2O LOADING. CONSTRUCT BELOW HOSE BIB ASSEMBLY CITY OF SEATTLE STD. CB TYPE I TE =15.35 IE -11.61 (B'CP -NW) IE =11.41 (10'CP -SE) OFA PLAN / 121 N 28'42'13' 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 10 20 40 80 1 ildl 20 IL IIORZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER PO MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 1/22/1 DATE THE AUSTIN le COMPANY r4.1 e.TANTS • DEP orE1(4 • FrOwEEx1. 018110 r.TaR7 WDRINI®T REGION D000 DRIEMATICIP441. WA. 8S BM, M- KITE i0a MAME WA. 9!13W ww CALL 48 HODS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINES KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DARE SCALE: PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -4.4 0 d C. 0 0 W OC O- W J S CO Y 2 NO. 1012P DIAMOND PLATE INSPECTION COVERS (12-x 12') '0' 2'0' 1.0- H 40- (-2 J NO. 222P DIAMOND PLATE ACCESS DOOR (24-x 24-) OUTLET 6 0' INSPECTION & SAMPLING TEE (SEE NOTE 3) NOTES: 1. UTILITY VAULT COMPANY, INC., 1660 -SA. OR EQUAL. PRESET VAULT SHALL HAVE KNOCKOUTS AT ALL PIPE OPENINGS. IF KNOCKOUTS ARE NOT PRESENT THEN PIPE OPENINGS SHALL BE CORE- DRILLED. PIPE OPENINGS SHALL BE 2 LARGER THAN PIPE DIAMETER. 2. LOCATE WITHIN 20 FEET OF DRIVE FOR ACCESS BY MAINTENANCE VEHICLE. 3. INSPECTION AND SAMPLING TEE TO BE INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. LINE -SIZED PVC TEE SHALL BE USED WHERE LINE 15 6' DIA. OR GREATER. SIX INCH PVC TEE SHALL BE USED WHERE LINE -SIZE 15 LESS THAN 6' DIA. 450 GALLON BAFFLE TYPE OIL /WATER SEPARATOR NTS 5.5' 7 r r-r BAFFLES -� GRIT /SLUDGE RETAINER WEIR '12) TI I 1i- V INLET 1.11 I 1.9 1•D 1 1.4 B' DIA. HOLE TYP EA. END FOR INLET & OUTLET 4. FILL WITH CLEAN WATER PRIOR TO STARTUP OF SYSTEM. 5. CRAY AND BLACK WATER SHALL BE CARRIED BY SEPARATE SIDE SEWER. 6. CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE WALLS MATH P.V.C. PIPE REQUIRE KOR -N -SEAL CONNECTOR. SEAL ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS WITH NON - SHRINK GROUT. • 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/C DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS Loi--)THE AUSTIN a COMPANY (b11YLTYRS• DEYMCq •ELF: eZQ../LWTar.TUR4 NORaM4f MOON 1100 MENIAL 01L 1300. moo xo MAME MA 9103Sl209 watemsalneen Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. pC�AL� 48 HOES QB *E YOU DIG 1-800- 424 -5555 1 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE! Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING F1..D SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT (ITILITY DETAIL 1. LE/y v 0' "Adri, # oe • ,4,,,- = pec;'m! Ia9,L �' 1 DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CJIOFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. C -4.5 DATE: DINE SCALE: AS —SHOWN I WM 9U9iM 1 PLOTTED DATE 6 TIME JAN. 21, 2002 12 :52 :51 PM FILE PATH 6 NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \ DESIGN \KCIA- P_HC.DWG ax-p -h, LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK -MS, KCIAxSV, KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIAxSP, 8'1(6) 1 'a- 'ea MATCH'- €XTSTINC CURB p a�^ _ -�- 6_C -TiEdt L� _ -_5 $TOP. 0 0 OS — tE) - 11� II; I I� Ir CROSSKALK' - MATCH EXISTINGTCUIFEC & CUTTER / PROPERTY FENCE CORNER SE'LY OF PROPERTY CORNER TP • _LEN 18.64 tJ ry LIMITS OF WORK Li 1 1 T 7. EE IE END CURB & CUTTER IA METRO 551M 18,25 50 (C TR OF CHANNEL) LOUTS OF PAVEMENT 0 \ '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \V \ \ \\ \ \X, \ \ N ` \ \ \ \ \ '. \1 \ \tn \ \ \ \' \ \\\,,I� \ \ \\ \ \* .\ \ \1 \ \'c"\1 \ \) ` \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ '1 \ \ \ \ ( \\\ A \:\:;, \ \ \ >\\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ \ \. J_1 I , 1 I , 61 I ; F , .0 1 1 P I - _24- _--= = -T_ -- ' _ �� 1 —== =1' ft I TWY GFA 1- — — — — ,, J 1 _ -, I �— �' ___ __ -_ 'b GATE CONTRa �:T �3'' _ _ 'e I 'y , ' 9 KEYPAD v3 (< °'' _ - - _ c _ - - SAW -CU1 LINE ' FENCE CORNER'` a _. 0 T5 K. ■ 1.7' SEiY \ \ \ \ r \ \\ \` \ \ \\ a \` \\ \\ \\ \1 T 0.2' RELY OF PROPERTY CORNER sil ■ ' H 1 GATE CDNTROL KEYPAD AIN -UNK FENCE 0 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CML INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRA'MNC IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND MAIN TAXIAWAY, 3' AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBCRADE LESSER TAXIAWAY, 2' AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE APRON /TE -DOW W/PARKINC, 2' AC OVER, 4' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE GRAPHIC SC LE 10 20 40 80 1 itch a 20 1L I Z B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 MARK REVISIONS /SUB MISSIONS 1/22/t DATE �c� THE AUSTIN - S COMPANY OROKTAKT}• DTP KIESS•En1.Ena •°oaTK1 MOW NORTHWEST 'mom ISCOO NIERK&NAT ONA1.I ELM. CUTE WO EARLS MA trIS-41154 CNLL 48 HOU S , BEFORE YOU DIG ` 1-80O-424 -5555 Emil Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PAVING; AND HORIZuNTAL CONTROL PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: RES CAD FILE NO. CADFR.ENO CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE: 1 -ems. DRAWING NO. C -5.1 • ° I ° np L • nl - r III - -- ____ ___ 0 - 6' —rte_— ,- -II °q„ - AOAN EV a, MATCH EXISTING CURB— - — _ & GUTTER / '>SwFLTr - II '-. UMITS OF r°74 WORK PP I./ D3 1 I / % II -_ - -- - - -- ND CURB GUTTER `7 IA VEiRO SS.AH TE 18.25 IE -'_50 (CSR OF CHANNEL) = f- .PRO.IERTY • -~_ —ter 6 CC -'l V. R0 SSI - 4s ; NAi°REC6RB$) '''� • LIMIT; TRO SSUH FF -189 TELE. VAULT! A =.VE GROUND.' J -808 w/ POWER RETER 1 PP 8/ ON' 3- TRANSFORMERS 13.5',13.25 CONC. FOR ELECTRIC ME 3' THICK 3' CONC. PAD HANGAR 2 FF EL. = 15.75 S z z a_ •\> \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \/ ' \\\\\\\\, \\\\\\\\\\\\�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \I\[ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ tS_SS- _SSS ∎SSS_SMASSSSS \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ V \ - \ - \ - - \ - - . \ : \ `\ 1 \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\A-\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ •\\\\\\ \\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ \\ \\\ \\\ \\\\ \ \\\ \\\\\\\\\-\\ \ \ \ \ \t \ \ \ \ \`,k \3\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \aa \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \'\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ ° \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ AC5 AN'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\0\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 9M1,aa■,.C171a ST. \ \ \'k \ \ \l� �\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\1. \ \ \ \ \ \ °�. \ \ \\, \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ (l \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ . \ \ \ \\ \\\\\\11\...\...\\ \_ \ \ r\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \1,k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ / \ \ \ \ \ \� \\\\0\\\\\\\\\\/\\\\\\ ` \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \' 'L' \\ "s"\\`` \\"" \ \ \I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \A \ \ \ \ \ \ 1: 1 \\ \ • • CNAIN -LINK rENCE BUILRING R TRIcTION LINERPI; ' KS, AIRPORT RECORQS) Q La Y ;e4? III I I I >s�r`�me>s' .ti ® a D ffliS4V FE.akr 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE OW INDEX PLAN, DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND MAIN TAXIAWAY, 9" AC OVER //i 12" COMPAC DTSUBGRADE LESSER TAXIAWAY, 2" AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE APRON/TIE- DOMN/PARKING, 2' AC OVER. 4' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE I GRAPH C SC ALE 0 10 20 40 1 it* • 20 IL HERZ 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22» DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS - e •THE AUSTIN . COMPANY caaITYITS• DESIHNEN9•E.NEERU• LM4TMIRW4 110rt1EN®t 1E0011 loop InERKAT101 S- TE 300 WA 8 CU SEATTLE MA Tle>d -4201 k •—f f Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 1 cau.a HOB EEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 i APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINES KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PAVINI4 AND HORIZONTAL ( ;UNTROL PLAN . LE /y 0 of was,,, c, : itil.gy ne ,OM,L DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING N0. C -5.2 DATE SCALE: i' =20' I IWW2'N/C/oo I "--- 6_-- l__�- -Il11_ ❑u r- :-- -R' ezt(LL_J_-- B- - -u- _ ~__D_ -U_ _ -a �__ _ � -2 ________ _ •+ °� _ _ 1 __ 11 _ lT - - R - _ I -- - ll-- y- -�- -u --tf-'�_ -- - - u �' - -J I e'' l 114 IIMITS OF' WORK _ - -- F DOND r BRAS 75{ - _ - / � _ ms- - -- �cAS ---- �— _ - •L ` StA4aTO -7TtE moss - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - - i�':A �`� �'7It:AN1' PROPERTY CORNER• 554H (ABANDONED) .......... - - - - _ _ _ 1 PROPER _ -TUNA tEe 7.58 (8•CP E k w) ......................... �`IO-BARB -.vGBE 'Yr 1. `BENCH&ARA'. TP err - - -- T -- � ELEV.-18.87 Lam+ i-'� - -- � _ —_ —_ _ L.:.� • OVERHEAD Qep BILLBOARD � 04 i 4 o \5E •0 4H w70 -26 • TE. t 11.63 1E.5,23 (CTR OF CHANNEL) 13.5':125• CONC. PAD FOR ELECTRIC METERS }' THICK 0 v N A 30 0 O a4 HANGAR 3 FF EL. = 15.75 a4 :4 3' CONC. PAD °4 W Z 0- tat La- N Y o - y % c a c u c N c ▪ Q J Z u = co O - J ca a s o o^ W ALT 5 !ARDRA - MIM„- r�lif=`7, e,T \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ .k\\ \7k\ \\'rte \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ Sl \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \L) \ \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ * \ ° \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \i \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \3Jj \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \fir \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ _._ \ \ ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I \ \\ 'c CiF\° \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \'� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \�\ \ \e� \� \ �\ °' \ \ \ \ ' \\ \\\�\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \\ \ \V \ \ \ \ \ \ \� \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \I\ \ \\ \ \\\\\\\\\ I\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ k \\\\ I\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ \\ ( \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \'C \ \ \' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \�\ \\\ \\\\ \ �\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \� \\ \ _ \ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\\\ \ \ \ \ \\ Z \ \\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \y \ \ \\ \7\\ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \. • \\ \ \\ \ \\ \,\\\\ \\\\\_\ . \ CC \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \b� \ \ \ \ \-\ ) \\ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ t7\ \\ �\ \\ \ \\ \\ \ +4a tifir \\ \ \ \\ 2 \r\ \ : \ \ ` yj`3SC 11 - _ _ - n, --cry ,.•_ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \II \ \: BU '^ \ \ \ \\\\\* \ 1::\\:\:\\:\\:\\\\::r \ �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. ° 1�e. J •• g \\ \\\\\\ • \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \: \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ .\\\\\\\\\A \ \ �\ \\ I RIocE uNE �; \,\ \ \ \ i \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ It:` is ��\� \\ \ \\ \ DIN- 6RESTRICTION LINE (PER K.C. AIRP rENCE CORNER 0.2' NE'L V.'Or PROPERT`f:' Ma- soi Mala. ®c. 90% REVIEW 12-26-01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND PAIN TAXIAWAY Y AC OVER /// 112 �COMPACTED TSUBGRADE LESSER TAXIAWAY, 2 AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12" COMPACTED SUBCRADE APRON /TIE- DONN/PARKING. 2 AC OVER, 4' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE I GRAPH C SC ALE 0 10 20 40 so 1kit • 20RHORZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/( DATE MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS i 4 Jae COMPANY a•sa7AN72.9m.e�e9•B1: e¢ER!•�oNa79rT9R2 NORRNREBT MOON MOOD MBMATIOI BM 200 BEATM1E W& MA 96111-4204 womfonsollnocai CALL48 FOURS Y BEFORE YOU D11,1 1-M424-5565 k • I ` I s Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINE[ KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING F_D SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PAVIN(4 AND HfRIZI)NTAL (X)NTRLIL PLAN 1. LEIy,1. DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 \V of LLt9i Gy �'4. V. c ` DRAWN BY: REB CAD FILE NO. CAOFILENO p ti CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. C-5.3 •tc ‘+ Alm DATE: DATE SC: ALE I I an ceim 03 I r..2o. J N 0 UPDATED BY JAN. 21, 2D02 12:59 :01 PM FILE PATH 6 NAME X: \101000- 101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13-14) \DESIGN \KCIA- P_HC.DWG U Y kcmx -p -h LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK -MS, KCIAxSV, KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIA ♦ice_ - - -n -� - - -ILI _LL - 4--11--- I- --x- -- `.•'�O ^° ° - -- _- - - -- -_- _ - e _- L__.11___IL__ LL J 1 . Ti- -- _________ -J act,- L_- �_- -u- - --R--n- - _ _ �.� — — =1T 0' _ -LL __ L__ -U -. _A j., ,'� O /nom - �' --- -____- b - - — • _ --'___ ®�'t.'ea� u' �-ll__L_I_'U___u_u-:-------4.--:-: �_ll__J!, T___0__ -? l'''''' _I- _ _ —s,- — r58 ° I -I�— et -_- 6 _ I— '_ 'EAST MARGINAL — — � - ii -- 1k LlMlis Of — °� �� _ — a Wq Y S 0 es_WORK °'p�o e� __,_� — (MONUMENT UNE m ' LIM°�" - .;. ° _ _ _ WO T_ ���� Q mss p.� ` ‘1'11 - T-__ -_ - - "4 - e - - ms_ - _ -.. E =jJ780fiM3 H ft, 0-26 Z`4 __ (CTR OF CHANNEL) `METRO 551.111 I q _, -.-.e. TE =1B 04 IE =4.54 (42'CP N k S); X 1- V7 +'J v4 Q� rte! : , _ a+t+C ~ `t BENCHMARK -10 ELEV -1025 J HANGAR 4 FF EL. = 15.75 .5, \\\\\\\\\\\\;\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 'C \ \„ \\ \\\\\\\\\\\?\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \- •sNAN- \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \\ \\__\__\_\ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, \ \ \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ ••_L\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ >,-•\\\\\\\\� \ \\\\ \ \\\\\\\\\ \\\\\ \\\\\\\��\\\ \•1-\ • -- • \ ) • \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\\\'\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \V\ \ " \e \ \ \ms s - \ \ \\ I� \-\ \ \ \ \ \ \J \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\-\ \ \\-\ \ \ \ \ \ \\ ��'-- \\\\\ \\\\\` t\\\\\\\\ \ \ \a. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .h'\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\ \\\\\k'\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ \\'\\ \ \\\\ \\\; c 0 CL c CY PLOTTED DATE a TIME JAN. 21, 2002 100 48 PM FILE PATH 6 NAME L• CO -b GATE CONTROL KEYPAD fril FENCE CORNER``'2 1.7' SLY & NE'LY OF • PROPERTY CORNER 1 L� H ;r, l of • I "1 eTr rnNTRn1 KEYPAD is ©,J80K LEIMKUHL, 769TBLK -MS, KCIAxSV, KCIA -UTL, KCIAXCLRW, KCIAxSP, J5 .X N nn 0 N La O p W OC �O1AIN -LINK FENCE li 0 SOMH W/ LADD TE =1a .J TOP OF WEST SPILL WALL =10 TOP OF EAST SPILL WALL =9. IE =8.41 (CTR OF CHANNE t� IE =8.31 (8'PVC- IE =8.06 OTEF TROUGH NOTE: ;SPILL WALL ON NORTH SID tr SOUTH OF CONCRETE D MATCH • J e • G PAVEMENT LI ONCRETETR• RE\ •\ \ \; \ \\-\\- FAE PeVC EN' C \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ .2 0 0 OF WORK III I I�� I I I I — c:3/`7, q JBOX r - {PI R K.C. AIRP� IER 0.2' IOPERTY \\ \\ \\ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \ \\ \\ \ \\\ \ \\ \ \\ \\\ \\ \ \\'\'4\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ 5 0 1 `3 `\ F CE 0.4' Sv(LY O PROPERTY CORNER) 0 0 0 0 4' • Q4 \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \\ \\ \ \ v AA ) A \V \ \ v A \ \ \ \♦ A A V A \ A A v 16'A 7 RIDGE LINE N 28'42'13. (('jj`8t=5$� 0 0 LIGHT TO BE RELOCATED LIMITS OF WORK • t7 0 0\— LIMITS OF WORK 0 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GENERAL NOTES: SEE CIVIL INDEX PLAN. DRAWING C -0.4 FOR ADJACENT DRAWING IDENTIFICATION. LEGEND / / //i 62' COMPPAC DTSUBGRADE R LESSER TAXI AWAY. 2' AC OVER 6' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12' COMPACTED SUBGRADE APRON/TIE- DOWN/PARKING. 2 AC OVER. 4' CRUSHED CSTC OVER 12 COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE SC LE 40 80 GRAPHIC 0 10 20 l nd, a 20 IL NdtZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/( MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE e (""�J now MAWS 1000 THE AUSTIN r Le COMPANY • 0E6F MFRS •EM?F1ER7•rtIWTWrTUILi NORIHA6T MOM NI6NATICOUL WO. EWE 700 SEMITE WA 116611-4614 ewe CALL 48HOB EERIE YOU DIG 1-803-424 -5555 k • f f Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PAVINI.H AND HORIZONTAL c. ONTROL PLAN 1. LX1y y� of "410 . o : . Iw01 p�' DESIGNED BY: LAN PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: R CAD FILE NO. CAOFlLENO CHECKED BY: RA. DRAWING NO. C -5.101111. DATE: DATE SCALE: 1.M213• @® oli•Ao I PLO' SEW: UPDATED BY JAN. 21, 2002 10256 PM LEIMKUHL 769TBLK -MS, 4' WIDE YELLOW TIE -DOWN STRIPE, (TYP) 24' 2f 24' O 1 0 0 EDGE OF PAVEMENT - \ TIE - DOWN ANCHOR BLOCK DETAIL (TYP) TIE - DOWN DETAIL - PAVED APRON NTS EXIST. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SAWCUT, MATCH EXIST. SEAL JOINT W/ AR 4000 UNDISTURBED EXIST. BASE COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE WSDOT STD. SPEC. 9 -03.9 (3) ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, CLASS B WSDOT STO. SPEC. 9 -02 S& CRADE COMPACTED TO 95% OF MAX. DENSITY PER ASTY 0 -1557 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION FINISH SURFACE SMOOTH CONCRETE DIA GALV R00 w/ MIN 2' RAD. BEND NTS r YIN EYE OPENING WELD EYE CLOSED SEE TIEDOWN DEPRESSION DETAIL 18' DIA TIE - DOWN ANCHOR BLOCK NOTE: 1. ANCHOR CONCRETE TO BE 3000 P.S.I. MIN COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. • NTS 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/C DATE THE AUSTIN (COMPANY 4t04.0XID•TXA+TE30•0•:•RTF! •mNST0MIRA N00IH0@7 MOON 1300 wre aTICMAL I1%O, KITE 303 MAME IA 91101-4234 CALL 48 HODS " BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800 - 424-5555 J EiTa Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81; APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PAVINt; DETAIL DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING NO. C -5.6 JAN. 2L 2002 11130 PM ILE PATH 6 NAME CIAXCLRW, KCIAxSP, KCIAxCHAN, K L, 769TBLK -M II N II II I 8'� := _ _ BUS 5i0P,�Xtr- LCi� i�.ii'.'^'.` ±` ■Q - �� W(R) SIGN ` CW JL� Cf �1 _.,_ qqT� `, l_J 74H - -� - -- - -.- _ {e14i- jjj��7_1L_ !T u ry Lt 6 8 0 u t L L: 1 I I • C f l-- - .. __ __ ff N J = a Te - - z = f °(r _ - _ DISCONECT SPLICE TO ABANDONED J -BOX ® ABANDON J -BOX _ _ _ _ _ ���_ •r• E3 -3/4---•-.c- J_ ______ - - -�� -r5 9158 -=-- ______ _ • OR PROPERTY C RER ;;74�_�-��;�—_ • S. AND- REC9R65) _ _ NON - REFLECTIVE I , 4' WIDE YELLOW PAINT LINE / �' ' 1 I �� � ► 22' • . EC WIDE WHI E I PAINT LINE ' III o ' uT -pi 37.5' 37.5' 0 44. - ASPHALT- / / '- 11 1 , 1 , I , I , r , I , r , 1 I , I , B' WIDE WHITQ 1/ 1 PAINT UNE 4' WIDE YELLOW FAINT UNE 11 a 11E DOWN ANCHORS (TYP.) SEE SHEET FOR DETAILS , 1 8 4 , 8 I t I S - - - - _ _ - - J _ _ , ' TWY OFA 1 - -- , t 1 - ` _ _ _ I' I GATE CONTROIs KETPAD t C OI i u ' , 1 1 hi ' 1 620 OM REM OEM WM REM IRO MIR Ma 1 , I ' 4' WIDE YELLOW PAINT (PIE AN -LINK FENCE , 1 , - ' 4' WIDE YELLOW; • PAINT UNE 1 • TELE.. VAULT1J ■ 6 -7 • B' WIDE WHITE PANT LINE T 1 , 1 1 ' 1 / I_I , Y / 1 L y 6 HANGAR 2 n 4' WIDE YELLOW • PANT UNE (TYR) EXIST. PUMP I y STATION ' 1 @a4ka el Vir er TIE DOWN ANCHORS • (11131 _ftUll.G 0 10 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 HI GRAP C SCALE 20 40 80 t:di. 20R.HOR2 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/02. DATE ,_THE AUSTIN . COMPANY C0.4 LTART2 • CEUt1ERII • E W LRE'A • r.OMITIn ICTOPJI WORIIM1®T MOON 1000 W W NATIOIML WE WO N IP SEATTLE. WA all -12W wwWwwwWwww CALL 48 HODS BEFORE YOU OIG 1- 800-424 -5555 nagConsulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813C APPROVED Cynthia Stowed AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT ;TRIPINR ;;I(;NA(;E AND t ;I(;NAL MT)DIFII .ATIt IN PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN 8Y: REB CHECKED 8Y: RJL . DATE: DATE SCALE: X20. PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 GAD FILE NO. CADFILENO DRAWING N0. C-6.1 LJ _J J Q _1 0 LJ CO LJ 0 CO U W CO OC LJ W 0 LJ FILE PATH 6 NAME CO U Y OC U ¢ V Y • m J = DL J 0 ;%, m h — o — w DISCDNECT SPLICE TO ABANDONED J -BOX ® 11 ABANDON J -80X +- � C 11 4 C + +OR PROPERTY C - ____ -__ - -- __ �w.�:- •��t�s..._,: -_�_� I — Y iNDyECBpBSi� _ _ _ f • I rn • 21 , i • � I _ _ 11 _ ___----- ---=-- = --__ __ _ Y gl --4 - - -- '� - -ys !FB cis 9158 _ 4' MADE YELLOW NON - REFLECTIVE PAINT UNE 0' / V _ • A►, I►,�.� AI,. 'i� •�tl..!& i I�% � 9 . - ASPHALT- WIDE WHI fE PAINT LINE I 1 ' O 37.5' it A � 1 1 II TELE.n VAULTLf 4' MADE YELLOW, PAINT LINE t3 T - �L ``s POUND 3' BRASS DiS1r - -_ - -_ _ $, $ - STAMPED 'THE BOEING - - - -.. '1, 1 - COMPANY PROPERTY CORNER' .1$11 I 0.1',Fk 0.1' S. - 11 OF PROPERTY- CORNER 1\ 1'tl 1 r 'TGHI I E 111 ■ ' a _ L _ 1 1 11 I ` • 1' 1 '•OVERHEAD / `U ■ _ BILLBOARD \L 8' WIDE WHIT PAINT UNE • 4' WIDE YELLOW ?MT UNE I I , 1 , /l r , I , I � tr I , 1 I , , , 1 , , D -7 8' WIDE WHITE PANT UNE HANGAR 2 - Y� l7x • • • • 11 A EXIST. PUMP STATION - l I • _ N 22'32'06" W 259.00' GUARDRAI • — _ - _ _ _ _ _ B -8 - ASPHALT- • HAP 4' WIDE YELLOW ' PAINT LINE (Tv .)\ TIE DOWN ANCHORS ( ) �1I�NS_RIMM 1UIESPFR -Kalb CHAIN -LINK PENCE ' I T—T -- I 1 1 1 N daa r.� 1 �� 1C>d tat" � _ 13>� ISM _ IWEd Ysti 1�1 tl a. La Mot ti= t� - Wei (. �a 7 11 • 4 MADE YELLOW -\ PAINT LINE 111 11 11 Rri ®� ZiFI TRIP ® NOE 81 8' WIDE W►,9TE PAINT LINE TIE DOWN ANCHORS (•) - '6'- ®MEI ® IBM ®®®® ® ® BSI ®® BIB RIB ® ®1 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPH C SCALE 0 10 20 b t iltll . 20 IL NORZ ao B ISSUED FOR PERMIT 'PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 1/22/02 DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY LOICULTAIR:.DE:0A33M•EN"S 33.3•I.eR."RM.ToC No1R/WlE BT LEGION 1000 ERERNAROMAL MAO, SURE 300 0EAT1LE. WA MI -3204 CALL 48 HOS BffOFE YOU DIG X424-5555 MaConsulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622-81.3C APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHNGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT 3TRIPINt4, S,It4NAt'E AND 3It4NAL MUDIFIc;ATi1!N PLAN DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADF ENO CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE SCALE: 1' -20' DRAWING NO. C -6.2 0 0 Lal PLOT SCALE 0 U LJ W PLOTTED DATE 8. TIME 0. Fu- FILE PATH B NAME X: \101000-101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIA- CHAN.DWG Gr. 0 Y Cai Z - - =IATH- - 4 - of 1 a•cc • =__' _ _- BCC - -`ACS ° ° =° : °. ---- ----------- � - �- _�__- 0-- -u__ rt--n- -T -_ `0�\ �� - � _ I - _ 1 - \ ti _ 4 8 4 4 4 = 4 s� c S-= _i. -i-_� �- Sl' C 11 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ FOUND J1 BRASS MR' ------ - - � �- =z_� ti__ r_ c= s�c c = _ °r c - 1I �(r STAMPED rTHE BOEING -_ _ -_ _ _ � � - B___,_ �� _ _ _ _ I�yyff , 'I �'° • - • 'COMPANY PROPERTY CORNER' ___-� - _ - - „ZI—b= 6w�� -� _ - �'� e- _ _ _ __ _ _ _ 4' � t t7 I I� 0.1' vh @ �. t' S. ____ - - - _ _ _ 16`.-rte' -, -'— - _ -$c 1 OF PROPERI7Y_CDRNER - tiO OB_v�E I I ' ' I, I --- - - - - -- - - _ _ _ - "a.'.-1- *.�,-� =�;:.� h.° I .OVERHEAD 1 _•_ -___- _ _ �. \ , U JI BILLBOARD 1 - - -- - --------- _ - - _ - _` L It GM r2.-- - - -„,-,1 -ems. I '� ' -- J. I Ol 1 V N V 1 U1 A I I'1 HANGAR 3 V1 a LO • 0 0 B -9 4' WIDE YEUOW PAINT UNE • • • i (�17 ►1,"11 BUILDING RESTRICTION UNEZPER K.C. Al 4° WIDE YEUOW PAINT LINE (TYP.) —� • • 4° PAIN • gia-sgs 61.6F1 522 1121/ ®- RBI IOW ®® OBI GYM ®®ILO RIB ® ® SDI MI_ ® ® ®® z ti J • • • • • w� ® ® ® ® ® N 28'42'13' 0 1D 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 GRAPHIC SC LE 20 40 ao I i1W • 2011. IgRZ B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER PO MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 1/22/1 DATE cJ r THE AUSTIN- "COMPANY faSYtTAeli.0E11•Eq.EM?1EE LT. 4M41 IP :TUR4 MORTNMEST REGION 1000 /A91Nfla1ML X10. CURE WO wowtowollnews "micro HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 , Consulting Enginee 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINES KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT ,TRIPINc;, ^II ;NAGE AND .".II,NAL Mt IDIFICAT1c IN PIA DESIGNED BT: DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: FUL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. TLE DRAWING NO. ND C -6.3 w 0 0 U 0 a m W W LJ LJ LJ = d cc z d 0 ¢ x U c Y 0 J c m X W 0 Y n - -� =v _ _- ft C TMH- c 8 O I � TP T — -L - -I_ H '----r -- - Jla_It_a u_ _l� 1 rt--Tr--rt--n--T--'-- -- _ F$__ =_ = e,M Y - -L- -ill EAST MARGINAL r P - {� i _ _- -- -- --=- ' _--- -- --------- _ -f- WAY SOUTH. l —_. N zz3raa- w _2+r — h A .... ...744T 04 HANGAR 4 { Jr 4' WIDE YELLOW —\ PAINT UNE 8' WIDE WHITE PAINT UNE i 4 t 35' - ASPHALT- • • • - -- Ala .i. L -GPO SPEED LIMIT SIGN —���� _____ J __ ONED 54.4. 11 1 ELECTRIZ T '� T - - SIGN 1 ,1 ly A I i II � II II ' 11 ` 11 ' II � 11 1 D 1TI TINT CEA 81' u • • «T IIE/yD�/O1WWNN ` n. �' ANCHORS T '1 y D ' it (T lr.) 11 I 11 1 11 ` II In • ni } II CV JJ1 ' I,� - N 28•4213 p • I 11 0 10 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 20 HI GRAP C S CALE 10 MI 1 ildl - 20 R. H0R2 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE e- THE AUSTIN 'I .COMPANY MOURAJMR6•C IA.1101•VAMFERR• 107,1I.TORA ICITEMEETT MOON NOW N ENN.41IOIML 9JTE 700 BEATTI.E MA 01 II ii704 twalhmaincera (,{LL 48 HOURS BEFO E YOU DI 1- 800-424- k • I I Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite -900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia S1...n AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT :;TRIPINh, :;R4NAT4E AND :;1(4NAL MI )DIFR::ATI1)N PLAN . LE /y DESIGNED BY: LAW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 � c 1uy4tDy c '4��Tn DRAWN BT: RHE CAD FILE NO. CJ10fREN0 A CHECKED BY: RJL DRAWING NO. C -6.4 . tom. # ATE D SCALE: I EOM 01/01/07 I r e20• CO W c a JAN. 21, 2002 119:03 PM FILE PATH & NAME X: \101000-101400 \101183 (KCIA LOTS 13 -14) \DESIGN \KCIACHANDT.DWG c CO c S Cn CO J O p W • OL z x 4' WHITE STALL STRIPE (TYP.) 0 8.5' STANDARD STALL 4' WHITE STALL STRIPE (TYP.) COMPACT 8' COMPACT STALL 1.0 " COMPACT' IN WHITE TRAFFIC PAINT PARKING STALL DETAILS MOTORCYCLE CENTER IN GROUP OF STALLS MOTORCYCLE STALL ACCESSABIE SIGN 4' WHITE STALL STRIPE (•) MHEEL STOP ACCESS BIUTY SYMBOL CL STALL 1 5.0' STD. &0'0VAN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS 9.0' ACCESSIBLE STALL .090' ALUM. SIGN AS PER MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES /R7 -8 TOP OF CURB OR SIDEWALK NOTE; SEE KENT STD. DETAIL 6 -38 FOR (NEKTONS NOT SHOWN, ACCESSIBLE SIGN NTS i0 Q OF PARKING SPACE ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL • NEV SIGN DR REUSE EXISTING SIGN AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER NEW PRESSURE TREATED WOOD POST 4•X4•X14' LONG 8• PVC PIPE SCHED. 40 NOTE, MOUNT SIGN TO POST AND INSTALL POST PER KENT STANDARD DETAIL NO. 6 -38 CEMENT CONCRETE FILL VOID BETVEEN SIGN POST AND PIPE VITH SAND COMPACT EO E0 OSTREET SIGN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE R1 -1 30'7.30' R5-1 30'x30' SPEED LIMIT 25 R2 -1 24':30' NO PARKING ANY TIME R7 -1 12'x18' CEMENT CONCRETE ONLY R3 -SR 30:36' 90% REVIEW 12 -26 -01 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/C DATE ITHE AUSTIN C�4o COMPANY mt}lianammnemt6•Ceawanverm .Tate MCC NIe M- 8-40.sureaoo IFAT 1 LE sA 20111-1204 2011- 1044:00 walhomollimsas • CALL 481101118 BRIE YOU DIG • 1- 800 - 424-5555 1371 Consulting Enginee, 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE! Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT STRIPING SI(NAGE AND SIGNAL MODIFIL:ATIoN DETAIL:; DESIGNED BY: LAW DRAWN BY: REB CHECKED BY: RJL DATE: DATE PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CADFlLENO DRAWING NO. C -6.5 MC rH111 01 rvHMC: V: \IVI103 tM, NRYURI nINL,Lr ) \ 83- JUNI \UI-CL-UL tIURYYILN 3CI) \Ir -NU I L. I.UYYU JOB # JOB NAME PLOTTED DATE & TIME UPDATED BY PLOT SCALE 'PCP' FILE PLOT VIEW 101033.10 • King County Metro JAN. 18, 2002 2:23:10 PM TAUNIES 1 =1 - -- XREFS: KCIAX2234TB—BS, k PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:23:10 PM STRUCTURAL NOTES CODE REQUIREMENTS: All design and construction shall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition. DESIGN LOADS: In addition to the dead loads. the following loads were used for design: Roof 25 psf snow load Floors Hongor Floor Load 100 psf Foundation Allowable Soil- Bearing Pressure 2000 psf w/ 1/3 increase for wind and seismic Earthquake and wind forces ore resisted by broced fromes. HANGARS 1, 3 AND 4 FOUNDATION LOADS: Design foods for the foundations were token from Sun Building Systems structural calculations for the hangars as follows: Hongor 1 doted November 6, 2001; Hongor 3 doted October 31, 2001 and Hangar 4 doted October 19, 2001. AIRCRAFT LOADS: The slob design is bosed on o 30,000 pound oirplone with tricycle gear. Ninety -five percent of the load is distributed to the main gear (14,250 pound wheel load). SEISMIC LOADS (HANGAR 2): Project is located in Seismic Zone 3 Earthquake design is based on the following: Building: V = Base Shear = 17.6 kips -- N -S Dir. HANGAR 2 15.1 kips -- E -W Dir. HANGAR 2 V = CRTI W 3.1Co1 R >_ 0.11 C0 1 W Where: Cv R Co W = 1.21 = 1.00 = 5.6 = 0.19 = 0.26 = total seismic dead load p = 1.31 N -S Dir. HANGAR 2 p = 1.12 E -W Dir. HANGAR 2 WIND LOADS (HANGAR 2): Wind design is based on the following: UBC: Exposure C, 80 mph -- P = Ce Cq qs Iw Where: Ce = See UBC Table 16 -0 Cq = See UBC Table 16 -H qs = 16.4 psf Iva = 1.0 SUBMITTALS: Shop drawings shall be submitted to the Engineer prior to any fabrication or construction for all structural items including the following: concrete reinforcement, embedded steel items, structural steel, and miscelloneous steel. If the shop drawings differ from or odd to the design of the structural drowings, they shall bear the seal and signature of the Washington Stole Registered Professional Engineer who is responsible for the design. Design drowings, and calculations or shop drawings for the design and fabrication of items that are designed by others, such os Pre - Engineered Hangars 1, 3, & 4, shall bear the seal and signature of the Washington State Registered Structural Engineer who is responsible for the design, and shall be submitted to Engineer and City of Tukwlo Building Deportment for review prior to fabrication. Submitted calculations are for information only and will not be stomped or returned. INSPECTION: Special inspection, per UBC Sections 1701 and 1703, sholl be performed by on opproved testing agency for reinforcement placement, concrete placement, high strength bolt tightening, steel fabrication and erection, grouting, bolts installed in concrete as required, and welding. Preparation of of subgrade surfoces and placement of engineered fill and backfill shall be inspected by the Soils Engineer. Soils compaction shall be supervised by on approved testing ogency or the Soils Engineer. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Contractor shall verify all levels, dimensions, and existing conditions in the field before proceeding. Controctor shall notify the Engineer of any discrepancies or field changes prior to installation or fabrication. In case of discrepancies between the existing conditions and the drawings, the Contractor sholl obtain direction from the Engineer before proceeding. Dimensions noted as plus or minus (t) indicate unverified dimensions and ore approximate. Notify Engineer immediately of conflicts or excessive variations from indicated dimensions. Noted dimensions take precedence over scaled dimensions - -DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. Dimensions of existing conditions may be based on record drowings and ore to be field- verified by the Controctor. Controctor shall be responsible for all sofety precautions and the methods, techniques, sequences or procedures required to perform the work. SOILS: See the Soils Report by Shannon & Wilson, doted July 2001, for more complete information. Eorthwork material, backfill and compaction shall be in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Report. Backfll behind wolls shall not be placed before the wall is properly supported. All topsoil organics and loose surface soil shall be removed from beneath fill supporting concrete slobs or paving. CONCRETE: Concrete work sholl conform to all requirements of Chapter 19 of the Uniform Building Code. Concrete strengths shall be verified by standard 28 -day cylinder tests, unless approved otherwise. Concrete mixes shall conform to the following: rc Test Age (pj) (dovs) Vie Max w/c Ratio 4.000 28 Slobs & Foundations 0.40 The Contractor shall submit concrete mix designs for approval 2 weeks prior to placing any concrete. The mix design shall be in conformance with UBC 1905. The submittal shall indicote where eoch concrete mix is to be used on the project, as well as the maximum oggregote size of eoch mix. Maximum aggregate size shall conform to the specificotions. ADMIXTURES: Water- reducing admixtures may be incorporated in concrete mix designs, but shall conform to ASTM C 494, and be used it strict accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. CaCl2 or other water- soluble chloride admixtures shall not be used. WATER /CEMENT RATIO: Water /cement ratio shall be measured by weight and shall be based on the total cementitious material. Water /cement ratio shall be determined by the supplier based on strength requirements and sholl not exceed the maximum water /cement ratio as shown obove. SLUMP: Field measured slump shall conform to the submitted concrete mix design. Tolerance of slump shoo conform to ASTM C 94. AIR CONTENT: An air- entraining agent conforming to ASTM C 260 shall be used in all concrete mixes for flatwork which is exposed to weather. The amount of entrained air shall be 5 percent ± 1 1/2 percent by volume. The amount of entrained oir shall be meosured in the field at the discharge end of the placing hose. CURING: It the air temperature will exceed 75 degrees F. within 48 hours of placing concrete, a moist cure shall be applied to the concrete for o period of 36 hours otter finishing concrete surfaces. Refer to the project specificotions for curing requirements. REINFORCNG STEEL MATERIALS: Deformed Bors Special Ductile Quality Deformed Bors - ASTM A 615, Grade 60 - ASTM A 706, Grade 60 low alloy REINFORCING STEEL: Reinforcing sholl be supported as specified by the project specifications and the CRSI Manual of Standard Practice, MSP -1. Reinforcing steel shall be detailed in accordance with "ACT Manual of Standard Practice for Detailing Reinforced Concrete Structures," ACI 315. Lop (14 burs 24 "; #5 bars 30" and #'6 bars 36" Stagger splices so that no more than 1/2 of the bars shall be spliced at any cross- section. Reinforcing steel shall have protection as follows, unless noted otherwise: Cover Footing, Grade Beam Bottom Bors 3" (cost against earth) Footing, Grade Beam Top Bars 1 1/2" Footing, Grade Beam Side Bars 2" NONSHRINK GROUT: Bose plate grout shall be nonshrink type with minimum rc = 8,000 psi. All other nonshrink grout shall have minimum rc = 5,000 psi. STEEL REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS: Structural Steel - AISC - Specification for Structural Steel for Buildings - 9th Edition High Strength Bolts - Specification for Joints using ASTM A 325 or A 490 Bolts, 2000 Edition Welding - MIS D1.1 AWS prequolified joint details Welder Certification STEEL MATERIALS: Structural Steel Connection moteriol, embedded items, - ASTM A36 channels, angles, base plates, and misc. steel Steel Plote, Fy = 50 ksi Cold- Farmed Steel Structural Tubes (HSS) Steel Pipe Structural Bolts Anchor Bolts Threaded Rods Welding Electrodes Headed Shear Studs - American Welding Society (AWS) - Washington Association of Building Officials (WABO) - ASTM A 992, Grade 50 - ASTM A 572, Grade 50 - ASTM A 570, Grade 50 - ASTM A 500, Grade B - ASTM A 53, Grode B - ASTM A 325 -N - ASTM F 1554, Grode 36 - ASTMA36 - 70 ksi, Low Hydrogen - ASTM A 108 STRUCTURAL STEEL: Structural steel design, fabrication and erection shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 22 of the Uniform Building Code. All members are to be erected with natural mill camber or induced camber up, unless otherwise noted on the plans. Substitution of member sizes or steel grade will not be plowed without prior approval of the Engineer. Bolted connections are to be of high strength ASTM A 325 bolls as shown. The minimum weld size shall be 3/16 inch, unless noted otherwise. Alternative connections to those shown on these drawings will require prior approval of the Engineer. The Contractor shall be responsible for all erection aids and 'pint preparations that include, but ore not limited to, erection angles, lift holes and other aids, welding procedures, required root openings, root face dimensions, groove angles, backing burs, copes, surface roughness values and unequol parts. WELDING: All welding shall be in conformance with AISC and AWS Standards and shall be performed by AWS- WABO- certified welders using 70 ksi electrodes and low hydrogen processes. Only welds that ore prequalified, as defined by AWS, or qualified by testing shall be used. Shop drowings shall show all welding with AWS A2.4 symbols. Welds shown on the drawings are minimum sizes. The welds shown ore for the final connections. Field weld symbols are shown where field welds are required by the structural design. The Contractor is responsible for determining if o weld should be shop- or field -welded in order to facilitate the structurol steel erection. HEADED SHEAR STUDS AND DEFORMED BAR ANCHORS: All shear studs shall be 3/4 -inch diameter heoded studs. Stud lengths after weld ing shall be os shown on the drawings. Deformed bar anchors shall be of the size and length shown on the drawings. All studs and deformed bar anchors shall be automatically end welded in shop or field with equipment recommended by manufacturer. DRILLED CONCRETE ANCHORS: Drilled concrete anchors, including expansion bolts, adhesive anchors, and undercut anchors shalt be as specified below or as otherwise shown on the drawings. Use of drilled concrete anchors where not specified in the documents shall be subject to approval by the Engineer. EXPANSION BOLTS: Expansion bolts shall be IC80 approved and installed per the manufacturer's recommendations. Bolt spacing and embedments shall be os designated on the drowings. Where the required embedment is omitted, the bolt sholl have sufficient length to provide at least the embedment shown in the following schedule. Unless otherwise specified, bolts shall be galvanized carbon steel and may be installed without special inspection unless noted otherwise. Expansion bolts requiring special inspection will be noted with (SIR) on the details. A current ICBO Report shall be submitted for all expansion bolts to be used. Expansion bolts in concrete shall be wedge -type anchors of the following types or a preapproved equal, unless noted otherwise - Hilti - Kwik Bolt II and Ramsel/Red Heod - Trubolt. Bolt Size 1/2' 5/8' 3/4' 7/8' 1" Minimum Embedment in Concrete (uno) Allowable Uninspected Capacities Min. Concrete in rc = 4,000 osi Concrete Min. Embedment Thickness 3" 4' 5" 5 1/2' 6' 4" 5 1/4" 6 1/2" 7 1/4' 8' Tension 1,000 Ibs 1,270 lbs 1,960 Ibs 2,205 Ibs 3,315 lbs Shear 1,680 Ibs 2,420 Ibs 4,280 Ibs 6,240 lbs 7,110 lbs ADHESIVE ANCHORS: Epoxy or adhesive -type onchors shall be installed per the manufacturer's recommendation. Unless otherwise noted, the embedment depth sholl be as listed below. Special inspection is required for all odhesive anchors. Acceptable adhesives are Hilti -HIT HY 150 or HVA Systems, Powers Rawl -Power Fast or Chem Stud Systems, Adhesives Technology, Inc. - Anchor -IT HS -200. ICBO report shall be submitted for all odhesive anchor products. Minimum Embedment for Threaded Rods or Reber in Concrete with rc = 4,000 psi Anchor Twe 13 rebar or 3/8' dia. threaded rod j4 rebar or 1/2' dia. threaded rod rebar or 5/8 dia. threaded rod $6 rebar or 3/4" dia. threaded rod #7 rebar or 7/8' dia. threaded rod E8 rebar or 1' dia. threaded rod Min. Embedment 3 1/2' 4 1/2' 6' 7" 8" 9' Allowoble Capacities Tension Shear 1,500 lbs 1,110 Ibs 1,875 lbs 1,580 Ibs 2,625 Ibs 2,300 Ibs 3,190 Ibs 3,020 lbs 5,620 Ibs 7,115 lbs 6,565 Ibs 7,850 Ibs COLD - FORMED GAGE STEEL FRAMING (HANGAR 2): Cold- formed steel framing members shall be of the type, shape, size, gage and spacing as shown on the drowings. Alternate members shall be subject to review and approval by the Engineer prior to fabrication and erection. Fastenings shall be as shown on the drawings. Fastenings not shown shall be as recommended by the manufacturer. CABLE BRACING: (HANGAR 2): Coble bracing shall be extro -high strength 1x7 galvanized strand that meets the requirements of ASTM A475 with a Class A zinc coating. Strands shall be connected to the anchoring hardware at each end with Broce -Grip Deod -ends as manufactured by Preformed Line Products of Cleveland, Ohio or an approved equal. Tighten the cable brocing to a tout condition while keeping the building columns plumb. JOINT SEALANT: Sealant for control and construction joints shall meet the requirements of ASTM C920, Type 1.1, Grade P, Class 25 with a minimum Shore A hardness of 35. THE AUSTIN .COMPANY NORTHWEST REGION 11000 Nr9 fTI01NL BLVD. SURF 300 SEATTLE, WAWA-4204 .'i 00 CALL 48 FO BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 Consulting EngineerE 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813: APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGARS 1, z 3 MD 4 STRUCTURAL NOTES ZIPIPS3 r/lo/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: DRAWING NO. 8 -100 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/0 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY NORTHWEST REGION 11000 Nr9 fTI01NL BLVD. SURF 300 SEATTLE, WAWA-4204 .'i 00 CALL 48 FO BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 Consulting EngineerE 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813: APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGARS 1, z 3 MD 4 STRUCTURAL NOTES ZIPIPS3 r/lo/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: DRAWING NO. 8 -100 0 N 0 0. m 0 CL PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 1 nes 0 0 0 0 0 CO z N CO CO N 0 fN 0 ©° a 184' -0' 0 O 46' -0' 46'-0' SW Lk 0 t0 0 cn -44141AJNIPmr -b. A/S -102 SW 0 7 0' SEE DRAWING S -501 FOR JOINT DETAILS O 6' THICK SLAB W/ 14 0 12" EW TYP 23' -0' 4 46 -0" o� I • < FLOOR DRAIN EL= +16.60 (TYP) O 0 46' -0' 161' -0' O FOUNDATION PLAN 1/16 =1' -0' 46 -0" HOLD TH SE DIMENSIONS GRIDS () THROUGH Og O SW EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 1/2' PROJECTION SEE NOTE 2 EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 1/2' PROJECTION 2 14 TIES SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED SEE NOTE 2 (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 1/2' PROJECTION SEE NOTE 2 EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 1/2" PROJECTION 0, EDGE OF FOUNDATION SW (8) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 1/2' PROJECTION SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 DETAIL 1 1/2' =l' -O' 1 DETAIL 1 1/2' =1' -O' 2 DETAIL 1 1/2' =r -0' 3 DETAIL 1 1/2' =1' -0' 4 DETAIL 1 1/2' =r -O' 5 (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's w/2 1/2' PROJECTION _J 214 TIES �T EDGE OF FOUNDATION A SEE NOTE 2 SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED • 6 1/2• (8) W/231/2' PROJECTION Sw SEE NOTE 2 • DETAIL 1 1/2• =1' -0' I 7 DETAIL 1 1/2' =1' -0' 18 NOTES: 1. SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINTS (CU) MAY BE CHANGED TO CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE SLAB PLACEMENT. 2. VERIFY AND COORDINATE ANCHOR BOLT DETAILS AND LOCATIONS WITH PRE - ENGINEERED BUILDING DRAWINGS. EW= END WALL SW= SIDE WALL THE AUSTIN .COMPANY aaraLTAen. axxniae • xwe®u • as rreunau t1 T 1E0an a000 NiH1NATO ATh( AL BUD. WOE zo SEATR$ ww ee.e -eia. xoee7aaoo ..ax,.a bower. cALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ` 1- 800 - 424-5555 Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81; APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 1 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETALS DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: sous ►/to/ 1 SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -101 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERJ10 1/22/0 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERjB 12/11/( DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS THE AUSTIN .COMPANY aaraLTAen. axxniae • xwe®u • as rreunau t1 T 1E0an a000 NiH1NATO ATh( AL BUD. WOE zo SEATR$ ww ee.e -eia. xoee7aaoo ..ax,.a bower. cALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ` 1- 800 - 424-5555 Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seottle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81; APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FAD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 1 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETALS DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: sous ►/to/ 1 SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -101 a 0 V V (n 0 a CO 0 0 0 CL PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 3:12:17 PM LAJ CO O 0 U Cn CD CO I to (8.9 2/4 ATA.B's 2' -6" 2' -6 _ f4012 ' OC EA WAY TYP ENGINEERED FILL io /4 EA SIDE /4012' r/— 4 /4 TOP & BOT 0 19' -4 1/2" TO R® 4" -0 1/2" Lel /4012 "OC EA WAY TYP 3/4 "o x 1' -3" A.B'S. � ENGINEERED FILL 0 0 ASPHALT PAVING 2' CLR 4 -14 CONT TOP & BOT W/ GRADE BEAM �r 0 0 • 5-0" -14 EA SIDE //44 0 12" 3 /4 TOP & BOTTOM SECTION A SECTION B 14012 "OC EA WAY -TYP 3/4'0 x 1' -3" A.B'S. •�o ENGINEERED FILL .1 1 3' -6" 3' -6" SECTION 1' =1' -0' C • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0. 12/11/( DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CONWATA01•00x01615•r 00111e14•caeevucloo NXRH114ST IEQCII 1000 N78NnTgNkL BLVD, B 000 SEATTLE, WA 011x.-4214 4 20e41744000 CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800 - 424-5555 , niza Consulting Engineer. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622-81Z APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE' KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 1 FOUNDATION SECTIONS DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: •Yeo Ino/ _ 1 SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -102 PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:25:17 PM King County Metro 322' -0 3/4" 17' -0 3/8• 0 NEW COLUMN SEE DRAWING S -501 FOR JOINT DETAILS 6' -8 3/8' 10' -4" NEW COLUMN IFF= +15.15' CO A/S -201 5" THICK SLAB W/ #4 0 12" E TYP ) NEW COLUMN NEW COLUMN 0 22' -0" FLOOR DRAIN EL =' 15.60' (TYP) 22' -0" 16' -O" S -201 22' -0• 16' -0• 16' -0 22' -0 22' -0" 16' -0" 22' -0" 22' -0" 16' -2• NOTE: ALL COLUMNS ARE EXISTING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE FOUNDATION PLAN 1/16• =1' -0• 10 3/8" ca 4" 6" XREFS: KCIAX2234T8 —BS, AUSTIN- 80XALL, SECTION AT ENDS ci+ 0 (0 0 V H 4 O W W L L 0 O n b 1- =1' -0• 1 A SECTION AT EDGES 4• 6) 3/4 "0x 1' -5" AB's W/ 4 1/2• PROJECTION EDGE OF FOUNDATION 0 O N (4) 3/4 "0x 1' -5" AB's W/ 4 1/2" PROJECTION c_ ca 10 3/8• I 16' -2" (2) 3/4.0 x 1' -3" AB's W/ 2 1/2" PROJECTION o A EDGE OF FOUNDATION To rE EDGE OF FOUNDATION AT SI11 DETAIL 1• =1• -0" I 1 DETAIL r =1 -o• 2 DETAIL r =1.-o• 13 Ca 10 3/8•.1 8 1/4" 1-=1' -0• I B 16' -2• TO Q EDGE OF FOUNDATION SECTION AT CENTER 1- =1. -0' C NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD MEASURE THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT AND FRAME SPACING FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL ANCHOR BOLT LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINTS (CLJ) MAY BE CHANGED TO CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE SLAB PLACEMENT. A NOTE: ROTATE 180' AT SIM. W/ 2 /(0 /2 "x PROJECTION . COMPANY caruuum•aaeoeae•BKMIES e•carrwunas PORTHNEET FMCS soo. eSERIAT Nut. SAX SATE 300 s&aTLE. WA. Seer-004 Inrctrumbwenk CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-801-424 -5555 APPROVED Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81Z Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE; KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL B F BOEING LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 FOUNDATION PLAN, SECTIONS AND DETAILS COL DETAIL r =1• -o" I 4 DETAIL 1•= • -o• 15 DETAIL 1•=1' -o• 16 oeara II/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01 -5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -201 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 1/22/0", A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERIIB MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE A NOTE: ROTATE 180' AT SIM. W/ 2 /(0 /2 "x PROJECTION . COMPANY caruuum•aaeoeae•BKMIES e•carrwunas PORTHNEET FMCS soo. eSERIAT Nut. SAX SATE 300 s&aTLE. WA. Seer-004 Inrctrumbwenk CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-801-424 -5555 APPROVED Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81Z Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE; KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL B F BOEING LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 FOUNDATION PLAN, SECTIONS AND DETAILS COL DETAIL r =1• -o" I 4 DETAIL 1•= • -o• 15 DETAIL 1•=1' -o• 16 oeara II/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01 -5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -201 2 c 2 GEN STRUCT .5 W V 0 a PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:24:58 PM LLI z 0 U X TYPICAL TRANSVERSE BRACING SECTION c m N 1' -0 3/8" 322' -0 3/4" NEW ENDWALL CABLE BRACING NEW TRANSVERSE EXISTING EAVE L� CABLE BRACING STRUT EXISTING CABLE EXISTING RAFTERS EXISTING BRACING EXISTING PURLINS EAVE STRUT ll B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERfl10 1/22/0: 12/11/[ DATE A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER118 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS INIVAMBA 1E% I A 5 -202 TYP[CAL )( k II 11 11 11 11 )( IhM f 1 BIM RI III I ■ ∎Mi, lEm ■ [1, 16' -0" / 22' -0" / 16' -0" 22' -0' 16' -0" 22' -0- r, 16' -0" r 22' -0" , 16' -0" ,, 22' -0" , 16' -0" , 22' -0" 16' -0" 22' -0" 16' -0" 22' -0" 16' -0" EXISTING DIAG. BRACING NEW EXTERIOR WALL CABLE BRACING ROOF FRAMING PLAN 1/16' =1' -0" NOTE: EXISTING ROOF PANELS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 'C? WCN N II CL •cl.� 0 1' -0 3/8' BLOCKING, SEE DETAIL I/S -204 MIDSPAN AT 16' -0" BAYS & 1/3 POINTS AT 20' -0' BAYS 12 NEW DOOR TRACK SEE B/S -206 EXISTING COLUMN EXISTING RAFTER SIM NEW 5/16'0 CABLE BRACING 0 EXISTING COLUMN SIM EXIST PARTITION GIRTS B/S -205 1' -10 1/2' 22' -1 1/2• \�— NOTE: SIDING NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. • 3/8- =1' -0' 1 A NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. REFERENCE DRAWINGS PASCO STEEL CORPORATION, 7/80: F -1. S -1, S -2, S -3, S -4, S -4A, S -4B, S -5, S -5A & S -6. THE AUSTIN . COMPANY COMATANTS•0114111911•EMONEISS•CONVACTORIII MOW la000 NIH MATONA BLVD. SU4E 300 SEATIIE WA. . e33311.204 206 674-1:00 ...srnenme CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG \, 1-800-424-5555 1 1 Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81Z APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE: KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND TRANSVERSE SECTION ram" •Ani DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: 1 CN(WN DRAWING N0. S -202 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERfl10 1/22/0: 12/11/[ DATE A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER118 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS THE AUSTIN . COMPANY COMATANTS•0114111911•EMONEISS•CONVACTORIII MOW la000 NIH MATONA BLVD. SU4E 300 SEATIIE WA. . e33311.204 206 674-1:00 ...srnenme CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG \, 1-800-424-5555 1 1 Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81Z APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE: KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND TRANSVERSE SECTION ram" •Ani DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: 1 CN(WN DRAWING N0. S -202 PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:24:28 PM King County Metro XREFS: KCIAX2234TB —BS, EXIST CIRTS NEW GIRTS IN 22' -0• BAYS ol• a 17' -0 3/8' NEW CABLE IBRACING NEW CIRTS IN HANGER DOORS DOOR Lf 3 SPA 0 18' -0" = NEW GIRT BRACING NEW GIRTS IN 22' -0• BAYS DOOR (3) PAIRS UNITS 0 76' -0'= 228' -0• DOOR NEW CABLE BRACING 1 DOOR GUIDE SEE NOTE 1 EXIST GIRTS IN HANGER DOORS 1L/ DOOR C/S -206 • DOOR LOCATE NEW GIRT IN HANGER-, DOORS MIDWAY BETWEEN EXISTING CIRTS 55-0 3/8' 322' -0 3/4• • • EXIST ROOF PANELS NOTE: WALL AND DOOR PANELS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY SIDEWALL ELEVATION 1/8• =1' -0• NEW CABLE BRACING EXIST GIRT EXIST COLUMN NEW SLAB 0 N V1 {n 22' -1 1/2' NEW W8x18 COLS — EXISTING COLUMN EXIST COLUMN TYPICAL ENDWALL ELEVATION 3/8' =1' -0• • 13' -4 1/2' 22' -1 1/2• SIM NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. 2. REPLACE EXISTING DOOR TRACK ON EACH SIDE OF HANGAR FOR FULL LENGTH OF STRUCTURE. SEE B/S -206 AND 2/S -206. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERij10 1/22/02 12/11/0 DATE A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER #8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS a THE AUSTIN . COMPANY cariLr4.n • 0®0rae . eweeen • w.reicf o.. PCRn7rE$r IcnOR 11020 KIEFIVATIONAL ELw. BUTE 000 SEATILE WA 9e•4204 206!74-6201) CALL 48 HOURS � [ D YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 k • f f Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEAT11 -E, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: AS PROJECT NO. 01— $7691)1 '.a`RO e44f�� `Poy DRAWN BY: W CAD FILE NO • 4 CHECKED BY: JRS DRAWING NO. S -203 • om 04 1210 -01 SCALE: I ORD 0/10/ 1 SHOWN 0 a 0 N 0 m O ii PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:24:11 PM CO BLOCKING • LOCATE AS INDICATED ON ROOF PLAN EAVE STRUT 2x2x6x16 GA ANGLE AT EACH END OF BLOCKING W/ 3- SCREWS IN EAC LEG (1) SCREW TO I EACH JOIST T&B "-BLOCKING Aliam (4) SCRE*S TO BLOCKING. -& 3 BLOCKING: 8 1/4" 2' 16 GAUGE FLAT STRAP T & 8 • MIN 2 FS 18 CA • FOR ALTERNATE ELIMINATING TOP STRAP, SEE A2 • REPLACE BOTTOM STRAP W/ 1 -1/2• CHANNEL WHEN DIAPHRAGM RATED SHEATING NOT ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO BOTTOM FLANGE. SEE A2 SCREWS: HILT1 112 -24 HWH (SELF DRILLING) PROVIDE SEALING WASHER FOR SCREWS THROUGH ROOF DECK Al FLAT STRAP AND BLOCKING BLOCKING • SEE Al FOR LOCATIONS • ALIGN BLOCKING WITH DECK RIB AND ATTACH PATH (4) SCREWS 1 -1/2' CR CHANNEL • (4) SCREWS TO BLOCKING • (1) SCREW TO JOIST METAL DECK A2 SUBSTITUTE METAL DECK EXIST GIRT EXTERIOR SIDING NEW GIRT 22' -0' SPANS ` 0 EXIST GIRT 1716\ 1/16// tI C5x6.7x15 =0• 0 1/3 POINTS FOR 22' -0' GIRTS AND 0 MIDSPAN FOR 16' -0• GIRTS RELOCATE EXIST BASE L & FASTEN TO SLAB W/ 1/2'0x5' KWIK -BOLT 11 IN EXIST HOLES- L4x3x1 /4x0' -6' (LLH) WELD TO C5 W/ 3/16' FILLET 0 TOP k SIDES, FASTEN TO FLOOR W/ (2) 1/2.0x5' EXPANSION ANCHOR 0 3• CA COPE GIRT NEW GIRT 0.071"--\ 3/4• 8 1/4' 1 2 3/8' 2 3/8' L 3/4• 8. -6' TO SLAB 1 CL COL (2) 1/2'0 BOLTS 0 4' GAUGE L4x3x1 /4x0' -6' EXTERIOR GIRT BRACING SECTION 1/2".1.-0" A NEW GIRT CONNECTION DETAIL 1 1/2' =1• -0' 2 FACE OF COL CL RAFTER 4 1/8 EXIST PURLIN EXIST RAFTER • • • • • 1/4 1/8 1/8 L3x3 1/4' STIFFENER EA SIDE W8 COL 1 16 1 CL COLUMN 3'± 13x3x3 /8x2' -0' EXIST PURLIN EXIST 12 f RAFTER 3 NEW W8 COL DETAIL NO SCALE 1 NEW END WALL COLUMN SECTION 1 1/2' =1' -0' C SECTION 1 1/2- =1' -0' D II II I Ir 3/4.0x8' EXPANSION 11 li ANCHORS (SIR) ® 4' GA 14 1/4 1 16 1 EXIST GIR 16x4x5 /16x0• -4 1/2' • WELD OPPOSITE GUSSET PL UNWELDED SIDE 16' -8 3/4' TO SLAB 1/8 3/16 3 EXIST RAFTER 1 ........... to EXIST L EA SIDE 1/4' PL CROSBY - LAUGHLIN 5 /8-- FORGED SHACKLE S -2130 CL EXIST GIRT EXIST COLUMN —= 9 3/8' 12' 5/16' PLx2 1/2.0 EA SIDE 0 SHACKLE -CL EXTERIOR COL 18 5/16'0 CABLE NEW END WALL COLUMN SECTION 11/2• =l' -o' 1 E GIRT CONNECTION - ENDWALL COLUMN SECTION 11/2- =1' -0- 1 F TRANSVERSE BRACING DETAIL 1 1/2-.1• -0. 13 NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/0: 12/11/( A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER})B MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE n THE AUSTIN . COMPANY Oa.wLTANTS•aemEIe•ewean•COIWTR (TORS NOWIRNBT mow MOO NIEATTLE.NAL TWA EWE zo SEATTLE. WA 90110 -4204 2ae -074-033 .eex...lhom k • f f Consulting Engineer CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800 -424 -5555 l 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81J APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE' KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 STEEL DETALS MD SECTIONS 90 �; ii 0 a m 0 0- N z PLOTTED DATE & TIME a c, JAN. 18, 2002 2: CD o 0 0 0 N � N d Z 1 Q N H F- LU I N N Q 0 0 U 0 jj ¢ o '6 ".5 it 0 _ o a X END WALL BRACING DETAIL z O 0 KCIAX2234T8 -8S, Al1ST1N- BOXALL, EXIST COLUMN EXIST. ANGLE A/S -205 5/8" BRACING PLATE V NEW SLAB CL 5/16'0 ABLE GROUT 3/4'0 AB 0 4 GAUGE 12' 5/8'0 EYE BOLT -CL GIRT 9 3/8' V AR 3'x1'x0' -6' BAR 4'x3/8" EA SIDE 3/4'0 AB 1/4'0 CABLE 9 1/2" L COL BAR 4 "x3/8" EA SIDE 12' V BAR 3'x1'x0' -6' NEW SLAB EXIST COL EXIST 14x3 EA SIDE 8/S -205 5/8' BRACING PLATE 2" 1146. 66. 615 NOTE: PROVIDE 1 "0 HOLES IN GIRTS 0 7' -2", 8' -6' & 14' -10" ABOVE FLOOR FOR 1/2'0 BRACING 4' 4" 2'I 3/4'0 AB CROSBY - LAUGHLIN 5/B'- FORGED SHACKLE 1 1/4" S -2130 1/4" 0 CABLE II EXIST RAFTER EXIST 1/4" STIFFENER EA SIDE EXIST L 2 1/43 �(LLV) EA SIDE 9 1/2" EXIST COL 12 TRANSVERSE BRACING CONNECTION DETAIL 11/2' =1' -0' 1 BRACE @ EXTERIOR WALL DETAIL 1 1/2"=1.-0" 2 BRACE @ EXTERIOR WALL DETAIL 1 1/2..1.-0" 3 • • N `r 6" a 2 1/8' "v n • 3. 3' • 1/S -205 5/8" BRACING PLATE EXIST COL BAR 4'x3/8' EA SIDE 3/4 0 AB. NOTE: BAR 3"x 1 ", EYEBOLT AND CABLE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 1/S-205 SIM 1 3/4'0 AB BAR 4'x3/8" EA SIDE EXIST COL 5/8' BRACING PLATE \ NOTE: BAR 3'x 1 ", EYEBOLT AND CABLE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. \ • N • B/S -205 • SIM PL 5/8 "x NEW SLAB 1/4"0 CABLE 115 3/4 • 12" BAR 3 "x1 "x0' -6" 12" 3/4 "0x8" II II EXPANSION A A A ANCHORS (SIR) 2" 4 4" BAR 4x3/8" EA SIDE 1" GROUT BRACING PLATE @ EXTERIOR WALL 1 1/2" =1' -0' A BRACING PLATE @ INTERIOR COLUMN 1 1/2-=1.-o- B END WALL BRACING DETAIL 1 1/2-.1'-o- 4 16 7/8'1 12" CROSBY - LAUGHLIN 5/8'- FORGED SHACKLE S -2130 1/4'0 CABLE EXIST rRAFTER 12 ............. EXIST HOLES CROSBY - LAUGHLN 5/8 "- FORGED SHACKLE S -2130 l/4• CABLE 2 1/2" (2) 1/2' 0 BOLTS 0 EACH LOCATION (MATCH EXIST HOLES & EXIST GA) 12 15 3/4' EXIST COL • 3' =1' -o" 15 END WALL BRACING o EXIST COL DETAIL 3" =1' -0' 6 NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. + B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERF10 1/22/02 2" 4" 6' 1 4" NOTE: BAR 3'x 1 ", EYEBOLT AND CABLE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. \ • N • B/S -205 • SIM PL 5/8 "x NEW SLAB 1/4"0 CABLE 115 3/4 • 12" BAR 3 "x1 "x0' -6" 12" 3/4 "0x8" II II EXPANSION A A A ANCHORS (SIR) 2" 4 4" BAR 4x3/8" EA SIDE 1" GROUT BRACING PLATE @ EXTERIOR WALL 1 1/2" =1' -0' A BRACING PLATE @ INTERIOR COLUMN 1 1/2-=1.-o- B END WALL BRACING DETAIL 1 1/2-.1'-o- 4 16 7/8'1 12" CROSBY - LAUGHLIN 5/8'- FORGED SHACKLE S -2130 1/4'0 CABLE EXIST rRAFTER 12 ............. EXIST HOLES CROSBY - LAUGHLN 5/8 "- FORGED SHACKLE S -2130 l/4• CABLE 2 1/2" (2) 1/2' 0 BOLTS 0 EACH LOCATION (MATCH EXIST HOLES & EXIST GA) 12 15 3/4' EXIST COL • 3' =1' -o" 15 END WALL BRACING o EXIST COL DETAIL 3" =1' -0' 6 NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. THE AUSTIN .COMPANY CCN.ULrum "ammNxo "xxo..sn•COMMI c,ae, PICRTHWEST NEVO. IMO MBNATIWAL ELYD. Exxre NO SEATTLE. WA:swxox xoes7Aixoo r CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 , fam Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -813 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING HELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 STEEL DETAILS AND SECTION I EXPOIEI 9/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: L.N PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -205 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERF10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/0 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY CCN.ULrum "ammNxo "xxo..sn•COMMI c,ae, PICRTHWEST NEVO. IMO MBNATIWAL ELYD. Exxre NO SEATTLE. WA:swxox xoes7Aixoo r CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 , fam Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -813 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING HELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 STEEL DETAILS AND SECTION I EXPOIEI 9/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: L.N PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -205 PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2: King County Metro EDGE OF DOOR FRAME 3/16 8' EXISTING ROLLER R. 5/8 TOP OF DOOR BAR 1 1/2 "x 5 /8"x 0' -8" DRILL & TAP FOR 1/2'0 BOLTS FOR ROLLER UPPER DOOR FRAME ti 11111 11111 1111 ■1111 MI NI 1 1/2" 5 3/4" DOOR TRACK ROLLERS NOTE: PROVIDE A 5/8" PLATE (EA. SIDE) AT TOP TO BOLT ROLLERS INTO POSITION UPPER EXIST DOOR FRAME 0.160" PL 5/8 " (50ksi) STIFFENING PL ® CL ROLLERS NOTE: 2 ROLLERS PER DOOR. EXISTING DOOR FRAME & TRACK NOTE: BUILD MOCK -UP OF NEW STIFFNER PLATE TO TEST FIT PRIOR TO FABRICATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN NEEED TO BE MODIFIED.. 1" 0.25" PL (50 KSI) LENGTHS: 22' -O" 16' -0" HANGER DOOR, UPPER FRAME @ ROLLER DETAIL 3• =1' -0• 1 SECTION 3 " =1' -0" A DOOR TRACK SECTION B EXIST RAFTER 1 3/4" 1 3/4" EXISTING 1/4" STIFFNER 5' EACH SIDE 3/16 OF a DOOR TRACK (2) 1/2'0 BOLTS 0 6" GAUGE, (TYP) NEW DOOR TRACK 2 -L 1 1 /2'x1 1/2"x1/4"x0' -7 1/2" CUPS AT TRACK JOINTS FASTEN W/ 2- 114x1" SELF- TAPPING SCREWS 0 EACH END 1/2'0 BOLT EXIST DOOR SIDE RAIL THREE -NEW GIRTS IN EACH HANGER DOOR 1" 2 1/4" [ 4 1/2 j2 1/4" 1' NOTES: 1. ALL ITEMS NOT CALLED OUT AS EXISTING SHALL BE CONSIDERED NEW CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING MEMBERS ARE PART OF THE HANGAR WHICH IS BEING RELOCATED. XREFS: KCIAX2234TB —BS, AUSTIN— BOXALL, DOOR TRACK SPLICE DETAIL 3' =1' -0' 2 HANGER DOOR SECTION 3 " =1' -0' C • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER #B MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0; 12/11/C- DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY IERWINEET SEGOS xxm WIEIWATICNAL a JOo SEATTLE, WA. SSISS-A204 wewitrawInsas CALL 48 HOURS SORE YOU DIG 1-800- 424-5555 Consulting Engineer: 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 2 STEEL DETALS AND SECTIONS DPW e/10/ DESIGNED 8Y: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -206 FILE PATH & NAME: FL 0 N 0 CL 0 O 0 CL PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:08:10 PM Z o Wwe 0 0 O 0 O 00 CO N CO 6 N 0 IN TA- !r x 300' -2 60' -0' 30' -1' 30' -0" 30' -0' 30' -0' 30' -0" 30' -0' 30' -0' 30' -0* 30' -0" 29' -9" 30' -0' TSIDE BOLT LINE (SEE NOTE 1) OUTSIDE BOLT LINE (SEE NOTE 1) SW THICK SLAB 4012" E.W. o 0 F.F.= +15.75 SW TSIDE BOLT LINE SEE NOTE 1) FOUNDATION PLAN 1/16• =1' -0• FLOOR DRAIN EL= +15.42' (TYP) - SEE DRAWING 5 -501 FOR JOINT DETAILS EDGE OF FOUNDATION 2 14 TIES (4) 3/4'0 x 1' -3" AB's W/ 2 3/4" PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) • SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4"0 x 1• -3" AB's W/ 2 3/4' PROJECTION 2 14 TIES SW (SEE NOTE 4) SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED (4) 1 "0 x 1' -6' AB's W/ 3' PROJECTION (4) 3/4'0 x 1' -3' AB's W/ 3' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) SW SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED EDGE OF FOUNDATION SW 2 14 TIES (4) 3/4'0 x 1' -3' AB's W/ 2 3/4- PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) DGE OF FOUNDATION SW (4) 3/4.0 x 1• -3' AB's W/ 2 3/4" PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) (4) 3/4 "O 1' -3" AB's W/ 2 3/4 PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED DETAIL 1 DETAIL 1• =1 -o• 2 DETAIL 3 DETAIL 4 DETAIL 1' =1. -0' 5 DETAIL 6 EDGE OF FOUNDATION SW 2 14 TIES SEE NOTE I-2\ (4) 1 "e x ' -6 AB's W/ 3 • PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED 0 GRID 0 EDGE OF FOUNDATION SW (4) 3/4'0 x 1' -3' AB's W/ 2 3/4" PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 4) • NOTES: 1. THE DIMENSIONS FROM OUTSIDE BOLT LINES TO GRIDS B k C AND FROM GRID LINES B TO C NEED TO BE HELD TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN TO ENSURE PROPER PLACEMENT OF THE BUILDING FRAMES. 2' -6" 2. PROVIDE 2 14 TIES 7'[ AT GRID 1D'. 2' -6' 3. SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINTS (CLJ) MAY BE CHANGED TO CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE SLAB PLACEMENT 4. VERIFY AND COORDINATE ANCHOR BOLT DETAILS AND LOCATIONS WITH PRE - ENGINEERED BUILDING DRAWINGS. E.W = END WALL SW = SIDE WALL B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER#10 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER1B MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 1/22/c 12/11/ DATE DETAIL 1- =1' -o• 17 DETAIL 1' =1• -0r 18 THE AUSTIN .COMPANY caraLrA1n,.am0.601.xeON PU.Ca S7t C,ae. Ml1„«YBi TEMPI soon MIEA,M7cnAL 0 -' FLOE 300 SEATTLE WA ,e.4ac4 2064744300 ew2w.rJme CALL V LL 48MSS e1.J N L YOU DIG 1-800 - 424-5555 , Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -81. APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGE' Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 3 FOUNDATION PLAN AND DETALS L Iaom ,A,/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: ( SHOWN DRAWING NO 8 -301 0 a a V N 0 a >- CO 0 0 z a x 0 2 3/4.0 x 1' -3" ASPHALT PAVING 2' -6" (7 2 #4 AT A.B'S 7 I V 0 j4 EA SIDE 14012" 1 1/2" CLR U 5 j6 TOP & BOT 4' -0 x40122 L ENGINEERED FILL j4012" U 2' -8" N 0 ASPHALT PAVING ENGINEERED FILL j4 EA SIDE 14012" 4 j6 TOP & BOT SECTION 1" =1. -0" A SECTION 1 " =1, -0" B 0 19' -3 1/2" TO GRID `/s. (HOLD THIS DIMENSION) 1 "0 x 1' -6" 4. 7 1/2" 4' 3 2' -8" 3/40 x 1' -3" A. S. 4 -16 CONT TOP BOT I W/ GRADE BEAM ASPHALT PAVING • M • 2" GLR 8 j6 BOTTOM Lo 0 j4012" C U 19' -0" TO GRID (HOLD THIS DIMENSION) 1' -0" 1 "0 x 1' -6" A.B'S. Q ASPHALT PAVING e ENGINEERE j4 EA SIDE j4 0 12" 2 j6 BOTTOM 4 CONT. TOP & BOT W/ GRADE BEAM • 7 4' -0 ti 2" CLR CC V n 0 0 SECTION 1 " =1' -0" SECTION r =l'-0" D SECTION COL/ FOOTING '2" x 1' -3" AB'S. 0 j6 EA WAY Z� 4' -0" 4'-0 r =1' -0" J E THE AUSTIN .COMPANY 101RHME BT 1E00M 1000 WIERNATCNAL MCC SURE 700 SEATTLE WA ee100-4204 k • I Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813 ' Cu 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-80(1-424-5555 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEt KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 3 FOlf1DAT1ON SECTIONS ,... co uxe, ;oy +`. hti�rca S\ roxa � B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERp10 1/22/0: A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERfB 12/11/C DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS THE AUSTIN .COMPANY 101RHME BT 1E00M 1000 WIERNATCNAL MCC SURE 700 SEATTLE WA ee100-4204 k • I Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -813 ' Cu 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-80(1-424-5555 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEEt KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 3 FOlf1DAT1ON SECTIONS ,... co uxe, ;oy +`. hti�rca S\ roxa � DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: IN CAD FILE NO CHECKED BY: JRS DRAWING NO. //� —302 S 3 DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN sow iio/ j V O a CO 0 O 0 0 V) w N 2 O 0 VI N CC CC O a 0 w CL = PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:17:57 PM CO 0 O CO 0 0 0 XREFS: KCIAX2234113-8S, AUSTIN- 80XALL, a` w SW v 7 270' -0'7 T 27 -0' 27-0' 27' -0' I 27' -0' 27' -0' II 27' -0' 27' -0` 2/ -0' I 27' -0' 27' -0' 13' -6' OUTSIDE BOLT LINE (SEE NOTE 1) w C L� T�TI ,I r w-j V U U O cv U U , /• h , ll , Q F00 C ,i I A/5 -402 r \11 1� Ni�r -40 o �� 3 0' SW F.F. = +15.75 iii, FLOOR DRAIN EL= +15.50' (1'v) FOUNDATION PLAN 1/16• =1' -0• OUTSIDE BOLT LINE (SEE NOTE 1) SEE DRAWING S -501 FOR JOINT DETAILS 7 6' THICK SLAB W/ j4 0 12' E.W. EDGE OF FOUNDATION 2 14 TIES (4) 3/4'0 xl' -3' AB's W/2 3/4' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 3) SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRED EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3. AB's W/2 3/4- PROJECTION c2 E4 TIES SW (SEE NOTE 3) (8) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 3/4' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 3) EDGE OF FOUNDATION SW (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 3/4' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 3) EDGE OF FOUNDATION (4) 3/4'0 x1' -3' AB's W/2 3/4' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 3) FOOTING N (4) 3/4'0 x ' -3' AB's W/2 3/4' PROJECTION (SEE NOTE 3) DETAIL 1 1/2-=1.-0- 1 DETAIL 1 1/2 =1. -o' DETAIL 1 1/2.=1.-o- 3 DETAIL 1 1/2' =1' -O' 4 DETAIL 1 1/2• =1' -0' DETAIL 1 1/2• =1' -O' 6 • NOTES: 1. THE DIMENSIONS FROM OUTSIDE BOLT LINES TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE INTERIOR FOOTINGS NEED TO BE HELD TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN TO ENSURE PROPER PLACEMENT OF THE BUILDING FRAMES. 2. SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINTS (CLJ) MAY BE CHANGED TO CONSTRUCTION JOINTS AS NECESSARY TO ACCOMODATE SLAB PLACEMENT. 3. VERIFY AND COORDINATE ANCHOR BOLT DETAILS AND LOCATIONS WITH PRE - ENGINEERED BUILDING DRAWINGS. EW = END WALL SW = SIDE WALL B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERlB MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/0: 12/11/C DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY ca°aATAne•axnwae •003e1133e•ca.,eunae, gaX1 W iE0011 .000 ensTvxxWk 0U0. ax1E 300 SEATTLE, WA 9ee1-4204 20e- 074.000 welMUilime CAL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424 -5555 Consulting Engineer. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -812 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEE KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION PLAN, MD DEALS 19IPIRIM °/1o/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LFN CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: 1 SHOWN PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 CAD FILE NO. H4 —S -401 DRAWING NO. S -401 THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CONSIATw,..Ol. W BI.. .. Ca.,.LC,O.t DOOR reisn .E. W& BLY0. SUITE MO SEATTLE. WA 911915 -5904 Toe- m.-7°o •5N•55•9neern CAL1. 48 HOURS SORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION SECTIONS 1 oxen 9/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: I SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -402 2.- 6" O 24' -0" TO CL 11 2 14 AT A.B'S 7 1 3/4'0 1' -3' A.B.S. 3' 1 a' •-, . \ /4 EA SIDE /4 0 12" (HOLD THIS DIMENSION) 4• ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /110 ASPHNG PAVN A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERi8 /4 ®12' 3/4.0 x 1' -3' A.B.S. MARK n x ASPHALT PAVING IT N i L ENGINEERED FILL IT N 2" CLR 1 1/2' CLR I I 8' J1 /4 EA SIDE 5 o XREFS: KCIAX2234TB —BS, • • ° �' 2. -4' o ° o °o ENGINEERED 5 /6 TOP k BOT J 4' -6. > \ j % FILL . 3/6 TOP k BOT \ /\/� \ /\ /.� o I 11r4 0 12' I_ _ 'PCP' FILE 1 SECTION r =1' -o' A SECTION 1• •1' -o• B iA' 21' -3 1/2' TO CL 2.-8' 21' -3 1/2' TO OUTSIDE 24' -0' TO OUTSIDE y PLOT SCALE____ ;, BOLT 0 GRID OA BOLT 0 GRID Op t COL/ FOOTING (HOLD THIS DIMENSION) 3/4"0 x 1' -3" A.B.S.--- 4" \ 6 1/2" 4• 2' 14 —I EA SIDE 0 14 0 12- EA , WAY -TYP N N j I ( 3/4'0 x 1' -3' A.B.S. I INN /4 0 12' N v I 3 16 CONT TOP k BOT W/ GRADE BEAM ASPHALT I PAVNG UPDATED BY TAUNIES to miimmii 40 ` • . t• • . • • 2- CLR ENGINEERED FILL _ ... J 1 o 1 • PLOTTED DATE & TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:18:15 PM ° 1 ` 8 7. \, 1 • • _II- '. , / I /4 0 12' 4 /6 BOTTOM C./ 6' 0" •. 1 ENgNEEREDI r FILL � 6 EA WAY —\,__i,/— n 2.-6- 2' -6 -6' LI • °o SECTION 1• =1, -0- C SECTION 1• =1' -O" D • JOB NAME King County Metro =a. 0 -, o y o o THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CONSIATw,..Ol. W BI.. .. Ca.,.LC,O.t DOOR reisn .E. W& BLY0. SUITE MO SEATTLE. WA 911915 -5904 Toe- m.-7°o •5N•55•9neern CAL1. 48 HOURS SORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION SECTIONS 1 oxen 9/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: I SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -402 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERi8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CONSIATw,..Ol. W BI.. .. Ca.,.LC,O.t DOOR reisn .E. W& BLY0. SUITE MO SEATTLE. WA 911915 -5904 Toe- m.-7°o •5N•55•9neern CAL1. 48 HOURS SORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR 4 FOUNDATION SECTIONS 1 oxen 9/10/ DESIGNED BY: JRS DRAWN BY: LN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: JRS DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: I SHOWN DRAWING NO. S -402 SEE PLAN FOR SLAB I /8' x 1 1/2' SAW CUT THICKNESS & REINFORCING FILL W/ SEALANT TYP. DISCONTINUE ONE HALF OF REINF ACROSS JOINT N SECOND POUR FIRST POUR SECOND POUR. FIRST POUR MATCH EXISTING TOP BARS PROVIDE ADDITIONAL 14 TIE EACH SIDE OF JOINT EXTEND 'OUICKEY JOINT TO ACROSS GRADE BEAM SEE PLAN FOR SLAB THICKNESS & REINFORCING TYP. BOMETALS 'OUICKEY JOINT WITH REMOVABLE 'OUICKEY CAP' FILL N1TH SEALANT ROUGHEN MIN .� M._ MIN. LAP cn W a r \ MIN LAP r 14 x 4. -6' 0 24' O.C. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CENTER OF JOINT /4 BAR EACH SIDE OF JOINT NOTE: SAW CUT JOINTS WITH SOFT CUT MACHINE IMMEDIATELY AFTER FINISHING SLAB. PLOT VIEW XREFS: KCIAX2234T8 -8S, e SURFACE TO BOTTOM 1/4' AMPLITUDE REINF. 'PCP' FILE 1 SLAB CONTROL JOINT (CLJ) DETAIL 3' =1• -0- 1 SLAB CONSTRUCTION JOINT (CJ) DETAIL 3' =1' -0' 2 GRADE BEAM CONSTRUCTION JOINT DETAIL 1' =1' -0' 3 PLOT SCALE >- m p W o IZ N W_ - PLOTTED DATE Sr TIME JAN. 18, 2002 2:18:42 PM 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 1/22/0: 12/11/( A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERLB MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE a THE AUSTIN .COMPANY W.LLTMTS•DE OMERS•I EWEH1l.WISIRM:TOR! NORD/YEST ILOON .000 etR3eWTI0NAL MVa..JTE 000 SEATTLE WA IS -4204 20e- 674-6300 eeex+E..woe • • LJ M z z an an King County Metro r 1 CALL 48 HOURS BORE YOU DIG 1- 800-424 -5555 J Consulting Engineer 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622-81.3 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGEF Rick ena AIRPORT ENGINEEI KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING RE—D SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGARS 1, Z a AND 4 COMMON DETAILS =e. a m 0 Q n o o �`,i, -- a TA% NU.Oy, ++ DESIGNED BY: PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY: IN CAD FILE NO. CHECKED BY: RS DRAWING NO. 3-501 .�( tI �roxu �‘ DATE: 12 -10 -01 SCALE: SHOWN I msn '/lo / 242' -4' 1 EXISTING CURB CUT AND PANT MARKINGS. 1 m RTY UNE MODIFIED CURB CUT AND PANT MARKINGS. LANDSCAPED ISLAND IN PARKING AREA . OF 2) 1 1 1 1 1 SEE AE103 AR 3) :N P' SEE AE10 SEE AEI GAR 1 1 PROJECT / BOUNDARY 1 1 F BUILDING RESTRICTION_ J 1 EDGE OF TRANSITIONAL I SURFACE AXIWAY 0.FA L.._R0PER1Y LINE eniMnnM11mNMM mmmm II 60' -0• 'PAINT CROSSW I 359' -8 1/2' 322' -0' 2 HR WALL PROTECTION 270' -6' PROPERTY LINE NEW AOA FENCE LOCATIONS OF AIRCRAFT TIE - DOWNS, TYPICAL uueo scw WASH AND DE -ICE PAD 50'x50' L EXISTING PAVING/ PARKING PROJECT BOUNDARY • GENERAL NOTES 1. PROVIDE STREET ADDRESS SIGNAGE AT EACH HANGAR BUILDING VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. COORDINATE WITH OWNER AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES. 2. PROVIDE SIGNAGE LABELED 'FIRE RISER ROOM• AND 'ELECTRICAL ROOM' AT DOORS TO EACH ROOM. 3. COORDINATE SIGNAGE TYPES WITH OWNER'S STANDARD FOR SIGNAGE. 4. PROVIDE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS AT JUNCTION OF TEMPORARY ROADS WITH PUBLIC ROADS. INCLUDE WARNING SIGNS FOR PUBLIC TRAFFIC AND 'STOP' SIGNS FOR ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC ROADS. COMPLY WITH MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES. 1WCR 3 1•I 1 1 100' I • ■ • • ' B R I O B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERIB MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY ao.IUwm•nraoe.•e BEB11 1 n1m�Rat 11631:11 110:0 rns.wnork MD. MATE MOO MUM; 11111sFUw vosIkamilMem CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 1-800424-5555 / ERB Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED CYnt 0 Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT N0. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY TCT CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE SHOWN CAD FILE N0. 769AS100.DWG DRAWING N0. AS100 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) O m o+ 46' -0' 46' -0' 184' -0' 46 -0' 46' -0' 101 45 -0' DOOR OPENING 201 301 BAY 91 100 200 300 400 80 TRANSLUSCENT ROOF PANELS TYPICAL — dj 0 0 61 FIRE RISER BAY 5 500 BAY BAY 7 600 700 601 (701) 90 AE101 401 23' -0' 11' -6' TYP. TYP 46'— O'1YP. 46' -0' 46' -0' 161' -0. HANGAR #1 FLOOR PLAN Scale : 1/16' =l' -0' • 70 OUTSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE PROVIDE 3 TRACK CONFIGURATION TO ALLOW 100% DOOR OPENING WIDTH AT HANGAR DOOR IN BAY NUMBERS 1, 4 & 7 HANGAR 2 HANGAR 3 X 11 8' 4' 0 HANGAR • NOTE: THIS IS A PRE— ENGINEERED STRUCTURE. REFERENCE VENDOR DOCUMENTATION FOR SPECIFICS OF GENERAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. '141 •I..r © PROVIDE WALL— MOUNTED FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (TYPICAL) 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERf8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/02 12/11/01 DATE D THE AUSTIN . COMPANY mMAXANMonna..r ®•m.Mesiw NOITIA ST I®R VOX OITERNA 1tlIML MIX NATI WA 1"N- E7 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 14300424455 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia SM.art AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.no d AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: GR PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769A E101.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE101 22:34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUGO1) O n 90 Scale : 1/16' =1• -0' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' NOTE: THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING RELOCATED TO THIS SITE. SITE BUILT WORK IS LIMITED TO NEW WALLS IN SOUTHEAST PART OF STRUCTURE. •:vu SULATION IN DMDING PARTITION. PROVIDE WALL — MOUNTED FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (TYPICAL) 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 LNRK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY w.rx.sr lever VOID 111121810.1101611. axa WTI lee E�Ta ;Ar.L- Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyna,b Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 FLOOR PLAN (RELOCATED STRUCTURE) DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE102.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE102 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUC01) T — I T 522' -0 3/41 i 1 T 1 I I17' -0 3/8' 22' -0' 16' -0' 22' -0' I 16' -0' 22' -0' 1 16' -0' I 22' -0' I 16' -0' 1 22' -0' I 16' -0' 22' -0' 16' -0' 1 22' -0' 16' -0' 22' -0' 1O' -4'1 r i r r r r r r s r r r r r r r r r 1 1 I 6' -8 3/81J 90 Scale : 1/16' =1• -0' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' NOTE: THIS IS AN EXISTING BUILDING RELOCATED TO THIS SITE. SITE BUILT WORK IS LIMITED TO NEW WALLS IN SOUTHEAST PART OF STRUCTURE. •:vu SULATION IN DMDING PARTITION. PROVIDE WALL — MOUNTED FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (TYPICAL) 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 LNRK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY w.rx.sr lever VOID 111121810.1101611. axa WTI lee E�Ta ;Ar.L- Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyna,b Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 FLOOR PLAN (RELOCATED STRUCTURE) DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE102.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE102 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUC01) 360' -3' OUTSIDE FACE OF STRUCTURE 2 HR WALL PROTECTION 600 HANGAR #3 FLOOR PLAN Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' NOTE: THIS IS A PRE- ENGINEERED STRUCTURE. REFERENCE VENDOR DOCUMENTATION FOR SPECIFICS OF GENERAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. NOTE: SITE BUILT ELEMENTS LIMITED TO OFFICE & LAVATORY AREAS. PROVIDE INSULATION IN WADING PARTITIONS. TYP. • © PROVIDE WALL - MOUNTED FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (TYPICAL) B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .Km.lOr RICO WX0 DIT9MIa1711AL Kra Krt. WI .unkwAuS S- S .e. owua CAL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1800.4245555 ENiI Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyntnl. Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.naud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE103.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE103 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 270' -0' 2 54' -O' 27' -0' 27' -0' 54' -O' 54' -0' 54' -0' 27' -0' A .10 ■�: ++ I I L'J AE104 404 BAY 1 T00 1 0_ TYP. - 0' DOOR OPENING TYPICAL 0 27' -0' 27' -0' f L OFFICE 20 AE104 E404 IAV 27' -0' 27' -0' OFFICE I`I r I I I 1 LIJ 404 LIJ AE104 404 BAY HAYS 200 200 1 300 1 4oi 0 27' -0' I. 27-0' 54' -0' 27' -0' oY OFFICE 40 rh TRANSLUSCENT I I ROOF TYPICAL BAY PANELS J YP 4 40 HANGAR #4 FLOOR PLAN Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' • fie EmASIMILE AE104 404 A101111141 a� OFFICE rn I I L1J BAY 5 AE104 404 l5°l .i eO (� MANDOOR CONFIGURATION PER BUILDING OFFICIAL APPROVAL TYPICAL D gJNP4NaUSE HANGAR 3 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' • :0 NOTE: THIS IS A PRE - ENGINEERED STRUCTURE. REFERENCE VENDOR DOCUMENTATION FOR SPECIFICS OF GENERAL BUILDING ELEMENTS. NOTE: SITE BUILT ELEMENTS LIMITED TO OFFICE d: LAVATORY AREAS. t� PROVIDE INSULATION AT DMDING PARTITIONS. TYP. FFtC S A • s •• PROVIDE WALL - MOUNTED FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVED FIRE EXTINGUISHERS (TYPICAL) B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY murAn.•oares•eo.®.•m.,.ciw roanewirr ROM Moo. nre.wtor/41. KM KITE SOD wnta w....•AOA Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER DRAWN BY: TCT CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD F1LE NO. 769AE104.DWG DRAWING NO. AE104 22x34 TTTLEBLOCK (1AUG01) O n 0 lo \ \ 11 Ill;;�;jlll� Hit i. EAST ELEVATION Scale 1/8' =1' -0' WEST ELEVATION Scole : 1/8" =1' -0' ` mmmmmunnmmmmnunummnmm�u (DING HANGAR DOORS nuiuummuu®nmmuunmmummuummmmuu / ` I uummummmmnmmnm ((SLIDING HANGAR 000RS mummunnmmmmmummumnnmummmmmmunmmu (\ `SLIDING HANGAR DOORS mm umn mmmmmummmmuummuummunumnnunmmimunum ( LIDING HANGAR DOORS T NO SILL TYPICAL SOUTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/8' =1' -0' mumrtn aLIMED1" (100 HANGAR DOORS /SLIDING HANGAR DOORS SLIDING HANGAR DOORS NORTH ELEVATION Scok : 1/8' =1' -0. • 4. 2' 0 4' 8' • 12. 16' 20' B A MARK ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE a THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .omn.lm 11111111011 IOOO.aE1NATOIML 1604 711111100 I AThJ 11w »7140➢. 1100.+110. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 100.4245555 J Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Sinew. AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TCT CAD FILE NO. 769AE201.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE201 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 0 a 0 O SOUTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/16 " =1' -0" O O O 1 NORTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =l' -0' SUDING HANGAR DOORS SLIDING HANGAR DOORS SLIDING HANGAR DOORS SLIDING HANGAR DOORS ■ co 0 EAST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =1' -0" 0 SLIDING HANGAR T.7 DOORS `i// SLIDING HANGAR DOORS r-- SLIDING HANGAR DOORS SUDING HANGAR DOORS WEST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =l' -O' • • 0: is 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .OIT.m Imo. IOW Nr6.1L &O, . ILVO Kra KO . SOTLIL rw>o. wooll000llaom CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG AC04245555 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TOT CAD FILE N0. 769AE202.OWG CHECKED 8Y: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. AE202 22x34 TITLEBLOCI( (1AUG01) 11) i 111 II SOUTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' NORTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =l' -0' 7 Scale :1/16' =l' -0' • 1mm�mm HMI In IIMMI mnmlHIIUIIUUII1i1InnlllU11n AmMIIIMM IIIIIIIIIUIMMHIIIIII1I11nmmlllmmmnIImmmmml EMMU i Iimmifinn Immml OII MIIIInmmmI11IOIinnmlmnlnl 11111011111100111 111111011111111111111 1111111111111101111101 oru ou L0 PE! LI1 WEST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =1' —O' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' .. • • 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERj10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m.uu,nl •.eoe...,. ®• W I.TIUCTO 0 .a11n..s1 n. onavarorm. Ma YR if lean; 1...11.,0. CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.4245555 r�Jir• Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.noud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE203.DWG CHECKED BY WSF DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE203 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) DOOR n N IiiII111IIIIIIIIl1111llllllllIII I∎W lllllllllllllllll111 IIIIIIIIIIIII11111 IIIIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111111111111111 SLIDING HANGAR DOORS _ �/ SLIDING HANGAR DOORS 111111111111111111 �� 11111111 iiiiiIliIIII11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 SLIDING HANGAR DOORS --- �/ SLIDING DOORS 111111111111UU11 �/ IIIIIII 1111111111111111111111111 SLIDING HANGAR DOORS 11111111 ^ I• I o I ° °^I° c•-+ ��� SLIDING HANGAR RS \J / �� _........._•._ • • ■•••w• • \__ — kin ell 1 WVDirfll Scale :1/16' =l' -0' • 1mm�mm HMI In IIMMI mnmlHIIUIIUUII1i1InnlllU11n AmMIIIMM IIIIIIIIIUIMMHIIIIII1I11nmmlllmmmnIImmmmml EMMU i Iimmifinn Immml OII MIIIInmmmI11IOIinnmlmnlnl 11111011111100111 111111011111111111111 1111111111111101111101 oru ou L0 PE! LI1 WEST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16' =1' —O' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' .. • • 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERj10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m.uu,nl •.eoe...,. ®• W I.TIUCTO 0 .a11n..s1 n. onavarorm. Ma YR if lean; 1...11.,0. CALL 48 HOURS , BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.4245555 r�Jir• Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.noud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE203.DWG CHECKED BY WSF DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE203 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 XII I 1:i: I I; 1 .111i 50 —0' NORTH ELEVATION Scale : 1/16..1'-0" 50 —0 SOUTH ELEVATION scale 1/16-=1.—o- CV EAST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16"=r—O'' NO SILL TYPICAL WEST ELEVATION Scale : • t 13 4' 0 8. 16' 24' 32 40' • • • W ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY COUNAD.1021.0122211:121.22212221.020T22C222 NORTINOW MON W2 MITEWIATIONAL WAX SIMI 200 22211111,M1121114302 20240.14202 222012220222= CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 100.424-5555 Erm Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01-5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE204.0WG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 22434 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING P40. AE204 ., .5' _,.._ SLIDING HANGAR DOORS 7----..\.... SLIDING HANGAR DOORS SLIDING HANGAR DOORS /---- SLIDING HANGAR DOORS 7----'\.... SLIDING HANGAR DOORS /*-------\., CV EAST ELEVATION Scale : 1/16"=r—O'' NO SILL TYPICAL WEST ELEVATION Scale : • t 13 4' 0 8. 16' 24' 32 40' • • • W ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY COUNAD.1021.0122211:121.22212221.020T22C222 NORTINOW MON W2 MITEWIATIONAL WAX SIMI 200 22211111,M1121114302 20240.14202 222012220222= CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 100.424-5555 Erm Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622-5822 Fax (206) 622-8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01-5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE204.0WG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 22434 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING P40. AE204 -t /-BUILDING COLUMN BEYOND. JOIST TRACK. r 600S200 -43, STEEL / JOISTS 0 2' -0' 0.C. DE FOR NUOUS TIVE BARRIER AT G/WALL ECTION 0 INSUL R =21 MIN. SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEIUNG PANELS IN METAL GRID. PROVIDE SEISMIC BRACING. 5/8' GYP. 8D. ON 3 5/8', 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16' 0.C. (Nom 5/8' GYP. BD. EA SIDE AND NO MIL BLDG. WALL AT 'SIM.' CONDITION.) 1" AIR GAP. METAL BUILDING GIRTS - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. METAL BUILDING INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. INSUL R =11 MIN. EXTERIOR METAL BUILDING SIDING - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. METAL BUILDING TRIM - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. n WALL SECTION AE401AE301 Scale : 1' =1' -0' AE402 AE403 AE404 HEIGHT VARIES - APPROX. 18. -4' TO 20' -4' - REFER TO METAL BUILDING DRAWI ROOF GIRTS - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. LONG LEG DEFLECTION TRACK WITH NESTED UPPER TRACK. ALLOW FOR 1' DEFLECTION. JOIST TRACK. 6005200 -43, STEEL JOISTS 2' -0' O.C. INSUL R =21 MIN. SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEIUNG PANELS IN METAL GRID. PROVIDE SEISMIC BRACING. we GYP. 8D. ON EA. SIDE OF 3 5/8', 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16' 0.C. THERMAL INSULATION R =11 MIN. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. ROOF GIRTS - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. LONG LEG DEFLECTION TRACK WITH NESTED UPPER TRACK. ALLOW FOR 1' DEFLECTION. JOIST TRACK. 6005200 -43, STEEL JOISTS 2' -0' 0.C. NOTE FOR STEEL JOISTS: LOCATE WATER HEATERS ON 3/4' EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD (66' -4" MIN.), SPANNING AT LEAST 3 JOIST SPACES. LOCATE WATER HEATER TO DISTRIBUTE LOAD EVENLY TO TWO JOISTS. BLOCK JOISTS UNDER WATER HEATER PLATFORM AND AT SPANS GREATER THAN 13'. WALL SECTION AE102 AA 301 Scale : 1' =1' -0' INSUL R =21 MN. SUSPENDED GYP. 8D. CEILING - 5/8' GYP. BD. ON 7/8' HAT CHANNELS 0 2' -0' 0.C. TIED TO 1 1/2' COLD ROLLED CHANNELS SUSPENDED FROM JOISTS ABOVE AT 4' -0' 0.C. CROSS BRACE W/ METAL STUDS 0 4' -0' 0.C. 5/8' GYP. BD. ON ONE SIDE OF 35/8', 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16' 0.C. 5/8' GYP. BD. ON ONE SIDE OF 3 5/8', 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16' 0.C. THERMAL INSULATION R =11 MIN. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. (NOTE: AT 'SIMILAR' CONDITION, FULL HEIGHT WALL IS METAL BUILDING WALL INSTEAD. JOIST BEARS ON TOILET ROOM WALL) 1' AIR GAP. FACE OF GYP. BD. T( FACE OF STUDS 0t, AT SIMILAR COND.- T( F.O. METAL BLDG. M I,18ERS. WALL SECTION AE401 AE301 Scale : 1' =1' -0' AE402 • 1,1,-BUILDING COLUMN BEYOND. 600S200 -43, STEEL JOISTS 0 2' -0' 0.C. MAX. REF. DETAIL 1 ON SHEET AE302 FOR BRACING. TYPICAL PROVIDE FOR CONTINUOUS INSULATOE BARRIER AT CEILING/WALL INTERSECTION SUL R =21 MIN. SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANELS IN METAL GRID. PROVIDE SEISMIC BRACING. (NOTE: SUSPENDED GYP. BD. CEILING AT TOILET ROOMS, 8' -0' A.F.F.) 5/8' CYP. BD. ON 1 5/8', 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16' 0.C. METAL BUILDING GIRTS - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR METAL BUILDING INSULATION AND VAPOR BARRIER - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. INSUL R =11 MN. METAL BUILDING SIDING - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. METAL BUILDING TRIM - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. WALL SECTION AE4014E301 Scale : 1' =1' -0' AE402 AE403 AE404 B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER/10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 12/11/02 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m,mAx e„oar,er•.oEBIA•COINTM,e,c,r ram.rsr ROOM *OM.ne.winw. •x11.0. """ MwN * all 48 HOURS BEFORE YIN DIG 1-800.424'5555 , Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Shaer. AIRPORT MANAGER Rack Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT WALL SECTIONS DESIGNED BY: LW PROJECT NO. 01 -5769D1 DRAWN BY: LAN CAD FILE NO. 769AE301 CHECKED BY: CHECKED DATE 10/24/01 SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE301 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) ROOF GIRTS - BY METAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR. JOIST TRACK. 600S200-43, STEEL JOISTS 0 2' -0" 0.C. NOTE FOR STEEL JOISTS: LOCATE WATER HEATERS ON 3/4" EXTERIOR GRADE PLYWOOD (4'x6' -4" MIN.), SPANNING AT LEAST 3 JOIST SPACES. LOCATE WATER HEATER TO DISTRIBUTE LOAD EVENLY TO TWO JOISTS. BLOCK JOISTS UNDER WATER HEATER PLATFORM AND AT SPANS GREATER THAN 13'. SUSPENDED GYP. BD CEILING - 5/8" GYP BD. ON 7/8* HAT CHANNELS 0 2' -0" 0.C. TIED TO 1 1/2" COLD ROLLED CHANNELS SUSPENDED FROM JOISTS ABOVE AT O.C. (NOTE: SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING IN METAL GRID AT OFFICES, 9' -0" A.F.F.) 5/8" GYP. BD. ON ONE SIDE OF 3 5/8 ", 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16* 0.c. CROSS BRACE W/ METAL STUDS 0 4' -0" 0.C. 5/8" GYP. BD. ON ONE SIDE OF 3 5/8 ", 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16" 0.C. 3" THERMAL INSULATION REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. OUT TO OUT, FACE OF GYP. BD. NOTE AT "SIMILAR" CONDITION SEE FLOOR PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS. WALL SECTION AE403 AE302 Scale : ' =1' -0' AE404 600S200 -43, STEEL JOISTS 0 2' -0" 0.C. SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CEILING PANELS IN METAL GRID. PROVIDE SEISMIC BRACING. 5/8" GYP. BD. ON EA. SIDE OF 3 5/8 ", 20 GA. METAL STUDS 0 16" 0.C. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR BASE AND FLOORING. n WALL SECTION AE403 AE302 Scole : 1- =1' -0" AE404 VERTICAL HANGER WIRE: 12 GA. 0 4' -0"0.C. IN BOTH DIRECTIONS MIN. AND AT EACH END. CON 12' -0" 0.C. EACH WAY. START FIRST STRUT POINT WITHIN 6' -0" FROM EACH WALL. PROVIDE SIZE OF STRUT PER UBC STANDARD NO. 47 -18. INSTALL SYSTEM PER UBC CHAPTER 47 AND UBC STANDARD NO. 47 -18 LATERAL BRACING: 4 -112 GAWIRES IN PLANE OF EACH RUNNER 4 FULL TURNS AT EACH END. MAX `� �\ �� MAIN RUNNER CONDUIT OR STRUT AT !� CROSS RUNNER ACOUSTICAL PANEL 2 "MAX. FROM BRACE WIRES TO CROSS RUNNER SUSPENDED CEILING SEISMIC BRACING • 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERII10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY mray.n •mx.a.•eomR..m.,aico.. .otmw ar n iaXD, 1m..s.I.7n as. tavq MITI A) MAMA Ultell11111■20.1 ... Cal 48 HCOS BEFORE YOU DIG 140424-5555 Effil Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia St..art AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT WALL SECTIONS DESIGNED BY: LW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: LW CAD FILE NO. 769AE302 CHECKED BY: CHECKED DATE: 10/24/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE302 91 SIM. BAY 1 100 90 ENLARGED PLAN AE101IAE401 Scale : 1/8 =1. -0' D 0 BAY 1 100 SU SPORT 90 80 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE1011AE401 Scale : 1/8 =1. -0' • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /1O 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 11011TIMEST MOON •CE..tE].MtO.V. ava. ITZ SCO MAT". ■► E..FffM Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rik Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TCT CAD FILE NO. 769AE401.DWC CHECKED BY: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE401 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) BAYS 800 SUPPORT 90 ENLARGED PLAN AE1021AE402 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' t / 17' -0 3/8' / % B 800 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE1021AE402 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' • e l : B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBu ISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY OOYLT..1..09 W 1B11.F,v®..0711IICIa. sme rte,.W1011141. axa.xte... CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1,8004245555 / Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN AND REFLECTED CEILING PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769AE402.DWG CHECKED 8Y: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. AE402 51 I OF BAY 1 50 60 600 I I I I I I I I I L ENLARGED PLAN AE103 403 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' 20 j 10 200 r LLJ OF BAY t 600 OF BAY 1 1 )FF1CL 50 r� REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE103 403 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' OF BAY 1 LAY 11 OFFIC 20 OF lY 119L2 200 OFFC( 10 (-4: ENLARGED PLAN n ENLARGED PLAN AE1,403 Scale . 1/8 =1 -0 22x34 TTTLEBLOCK (1A0001) AE103 E403 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' • LIJ L_ 7 n B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 NARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY MMMWMMTMEMCM •MO t.t6.MUMM tAVa .t. MM wm.. t.►.n..o. Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT N0. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: TCT CAD FILE N0. 769AE403.OWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE_ 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. AE403 r ENLARGED PLAN BAY 1 100 AE1041AE404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' BAY 1 I100I REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE104 E404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' AE104 ENLARGED PLAN Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' n REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE104 4E404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' 31 ENLARGED PLAN AE104 E404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' n ENLARGED PLAN AE194O4 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0- • FFI 0 FILE 10 20 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE104 404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' r 500 1. Urr Gt 1501 M REFLECTED CEILING PLAN AE104} 404 Scale : 1/8 =1' -0' 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER/10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER/8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY WMPU Am•@nOen•Bq.®O•mn.c'w MWM NT N.70. noon onwounawt smix a 's tm ow•ew alp! Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER DRAWN BY: TCT CHECKED BY: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE NO. 769AE404.DWG DRAWING NO. AE404 22x34 111LEBLOCK (1A0001) ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE NO ROOM NAME FLOOR g/L5E NORTH WALL EAST WALL SOUTH WALL WEST WALL CEILING REMARKS NO EXISTING -- __ CL. CUSS -- -- GB 9.BSTDAIE FNsH WA SUBSTRATE FNse SUBSTRATE F•ISH SUBSTRATE FINBH SUBSTRATE FINISH MAIL FIN HEIGHT HAN 11 PNNT TYPES /COL0R.S P1 FLAT PANT -- __ P2 FIRE RISFR C - - YP - MP - MP - MP - - - - MP BALLS TO BE INSUI. 81 70 ELEC. ROOM C - - MP - MP - MP - MP - - - - +� yP rom �11�a n2 80 LAV C VCT1 B1 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB/W1 P3 C8 /N'1 P3 CB P1 8' -0' 90 UPPORT AREA C CPT1 81 GB P2 G8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACT1 - 9•_0• 100 BAY 1 C - - MP /GB P3 MP - MP - GB P3 - - - 200 BAY 2 C - - co P3 CB P3 MP - CB P3 - - - 300 BAY 3 C - - GB P3 GB P3 UP - GB P3 - - - 400 BAY 4 C - - CB P3 GB P3 MP - MP /CB P3 - - - 500 BAY 5 c - - MP - GB P3 CB P3 GB P3 - - - 600 BAY 6 c - - MP - GA Pt P3 17i CB P3 P3 OR GB P3 _ - - 700 BAY 7 C - - MP - CB HANGAR 12 BO ,SUPPORT AREA C CPT1 81 CB P2 G8 P2 GB P2 C8 P2 ACT1 - 9' -0• 90 LAV C VCT1 B1 GB/W1 P3 G8/W1 P3 G3/W1 P3 CB/1W1 P3 GB P1 8' -0" 100 BAY 1 C - - E E E E E 101 SUPPORT c - - MP - MP - MP - MP - - - - MP WALLS TO BE NSU_ 200 BAY 2 C - - E E E E E 300 BAY 3 C - - E E E E E 400 BAY 4 C - - E E E E E 500 BAY 5 C - - E E E E E 600 BAY 6 C - - E E E E E 700 BAY 7 C - - E E E E E 800 BAY 8 C - - E E /G8 P3 E/68 P3 E E HANGAR 13 10 OFFICE C CPT1 81 CB P2 C8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACT1 - 9' -0• 11 LAV C VCT1 81 G8/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 G13/WI P3 GB/W1 P3 CB P1 8' -0" 20 OFFICE C CPTI 81 CB P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACTT - 9' -0' 21 LAV C VCT1 81 GB/W1 P3 CB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB PT 8' -0' 30 OFFICE C CPT1 B1 G8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACTT - 9' -0• 31 LAY C VCT1 81 CB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 GB/11/1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB P1 B' -O 40 OFFICE c CPT/ 81 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 A611 - 9' -0• 41 LAV C VCT1 B1 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 GB/WI P3 G8 P1 8F-0" 50 OFFICE C CPTI B1 CB P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACTT - 9' -0' 51 LAV C VCT1 81 G3/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 G3/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 GB P1 8' -0• 60 OFFICE C CPT1 B1 GB P2 CB P2 CB P2 GB P2 ACTT - 9' -0• 61 LAV C VCTI B1 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 C8/W1 P3 CB /III P3 GB P1 8' -0" 100 BAY 1 C - - MP - MP - GB P3 11P /G8 P3 _ _ _ 200 BAY 2 C - - CB P3 MP - co P3 MP /G8 P3 - - - 300 BAY 3 C - - GB P3 MP - CB P3 MP /W P3 400 BAY 4 C - - GB P3 UP - CB P3 MP /GB P3 - - - 500 BAY 5 c - - 08 P3 MP - GB p3 MP /GB P3 - - - 600 BAY 6 C - - GB P3 MP - MP - MWWGB P3 - - - HANGAR 14 10 OFFICE C CPTI 81 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACT1 - 9' -0• 11 LAV C VCT1 81 G8/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB/WI P3 CB/W1 P3 GB P1 8' -0' 20 OFFICE C CPT1 81 G8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 AC11 - 9' -0• 21 LAV C VCT1 B1 GB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB/W1 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB P1 8' -0• 30 OFFICE C CPTI 81 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACT1 - 9' -0• 31 IAV C VCT1 81 G3/W1 P3 CB/W1 P3 68/W1 P3 68/W1 P3 GB P1 8' -0" 40 OFFICE C CPTI 81 GB P2 G8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 AC71 - 9' -0• 41 LAV C VCT1 81 GB/W1 P3 68/W1 P3 COAT P3 G8/W1 P3 GB P1 8' -0" 50 OFFICE C CPT% 81 03 P2 G8 P2 GB P2 GB P2 ACT1 - 9' -0" 51 LAV C VCT1 81 68/81 P3 GB/W1 P3 CB/W1 P3 GB/WI P3 G8 P1 8' -0' 100 BAY 1 C - - GB P3 MP - MP - MP /68 P3 - - - - 200 Y 2 C - - CB P3 MP - CA P3 MP /tB P1 - _ 300 Y 3 C - - 1'A P1 UP - GA P1 400 Y 4 C - - CB P3 MP - CB P3 MP.GB P3 - - - - 5011 Y 5 C - - MP - MP - GB P3 MP /CB P3 - - - INTERIOR FINISHES NOTES: 1. FINISH /MATERIAL MANUFACTURER /COLOR REMARKS SUBSTRATES C CONCRETE -- -- E EXISTING -- __ CL. CUSS -- -- GB GYPSUM BOARD -- -- MP PRE-ENGINEERED METAL PANEL -- __ 5 CONCRETE SEALER __ __ PNNT TYPES /COL0R.S P1 FLAT PANT -- __ P2 LATEX ECG -SMELL PAINT -- __ P3 LATEX SEAR -GLOSS PANT -- __ P4 0.055 PAN1 -- M.M. 60014 FRAMES WALL FINISHES 81 PLASTIC LAMINATE WANSCCAT FROM PUS UIBLATE IOULDWG A TOP EOCE ROOR'C TYPES CPT CARPET -_ -_ V1 VINYL FLOORNG -- -- VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE -- -- BASE TYPES /COLORS B1 4 RUBBER COVE BASE ROPPE -- CEUNG FINISH ACT1 SUSPENDED ACOUSTICAL CUUG -- -- GB GYPSUM BOARD -- __ LAMINATE -- • TYPICAL BB RESTROOM ELEV. 600 Scole : 1/e=1' -0' PLASTIC LAMINATE WAINSCOT W/ UPPER EGDE TRIM. TOILET PAPER HOLDER PROVIDE INSULATION WRAP AT HOT WATER SUPPLY TYPICAL AND DRAN UNES A RESTROOM ELEV. 600 Scole : 1/4' =1'-0' B ISSUED FOR-PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIOS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY aaW.aww. e®aB1.8.1®1. CORPLCTOSS NORT BF 11®11 1R00.R6YA71d11L tWa. SUITE >m MAMA 10.111111111411114 gmallwantliumg CAII 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.424-5555 , Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE TOILET RM. PLAN/ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: GAR CAD FILE N0. 769AE600.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING N0. AE600 NOTES: 1. CLEAN AND TOLCH UP DAMAGED FINSH ON EXISTING DOORS TO REMAN ON RELOCATED HAI4AR. 2. ALL PIPING AND CONDUIT NEXT TO AD1ACENT SURFACES TO BE PANTED THE SAME COLON AS ADJACENT SURFACE 3. r moms EXISTING TO REMAN AND BE RELOCATED. 4. PANT ALL EXPOSED METAL BUILDING STRUCTURAL MEMBERS - COLUMNS. BEAMS. GIRTS. PURUF6. ETC. • TYPICAL BB RESTROOM ELEV. 600 Scole : 1/e=1' -0' PLASTIC LAMINATE WAINSCOT W/ UPPER EGDE TRIM. TOILET PAPER HOLDER PROVIDE INSULATION WRAP AT HOT WATER SUPPLY TYPICAL AND DRAN UNES A RESTROOM ELEV. 600 Scole : 1/4' =1'-0' B ISSUED FOR-PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIOS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY aaW.aww. e®aB1.8.1®1. CORPLCTOSS NORT BF 11®11 1R00.R6YA71d11L tWa. SUITE >m MAMA 10.111111111411114 gmallwantliumg CAII 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.424-5555 , Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE TOILET RM. PLAN/ELEVATIONS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: GAR CAD FILE N0. 769AE600.DWG CHECKED BY: WSF DATE: 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING N0. AE600 DOOR SCHEDULE Y o (DOOR SHOWN ON DWG. NO. DOOR SIZE DOOR MATERIAL DETAILS- SECTIONS FRAME NATL. GLASS FIRE RATING IN MINUTE HARDWARE GROUP REMARKS 1 OPENING WIDTH OPENING HEIGHT DOOR THICKNESS IHOLLOW METAL Z m a WOOD - SOLID LOUVER JAMB HEAD THRESHOLD w STEEL m i K j HANGAR /1 61 A AE -10 3' -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 61 71 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' / X - - - - • • • 1 A -601 / 1/A -601 1/A -601 1/A -601 1/A -601 1/A -601 - - 1 1 1 X X X - - - - - - -- - o P BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 71 81 91 101 81 A AE 10 3' 0' 7' -0 1 3/4" X 91 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4' X 101 TO BE (ESIGNED BY THE BU _DING MANUFACTURER 102 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 102 201 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BULDING MANUFACTUR R c5 201 301 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE 8U ,_DING MANUFACTUR R o 301 401 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BULDING MANUFACTUR R 401 402 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 314" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - vwi BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 402 501 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BULDING MANUFACTURER 501 601 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BU DING MANUFACTURER 601_ 701 701 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE AU ._DING MANUFACTUR :R HANGAR /2 81 A AE -101 3' -0• 6' -8' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 81 91 A AE -101 3'-0' 6' -8' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 91 101 EXISTIN; /RELO:ATED WTH BUILDING N 101 102 A AE -101 3' -0" 6' -8' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 102 103 A AE -101 3' -0' 6' -B" 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - «T: ° BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 103 201 EXISTIN; /RELO;ATED WITH BUILDING z 201 301 EXISTIN/RELO:ATED WITH BUILDING = 301 401 EXISTINVREL0;ATE0 WITH BUILDING DIN 401 501 EXISTIN,; /RELO;ATED WITH WILDING 501 601 EXISTIN %RELOCATED WITH EUILDING o_ vx 601 701 EXISTIN /RELO;ATED WITH BUILDING w 701 801 EXISTIN;/RELO;ATED WITH BUILDING in 801 802 A AE -101 3' -O" 6' -8' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - BY THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER 802 HANGAR 13 10 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0• 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 10 11 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0• 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 11 20 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 20 21 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 21 30 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 30 31 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0' 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 31 40 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0" 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 40 41 A AE -101 3. -0' 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 41 50 A AE -101 3' -0" 7. -0" 1 3/4' X - - 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 50 51 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - ,., 51 60 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 0 60 61 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0• 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - zz 61 I 100 TO BE ( ESIGNED BY THE BU DING UFACTUR R 100 101 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BU DING MA UFACTURR 101 200 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR -13 200 201 TO BE CESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR;R 201 300 TO BE CESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTURR 300 301 TO BE CESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR 'R vwi 301 400 TO BE CESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR :R 400 401 TO BE C ESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR R 401 500 TO BE C ESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR R 500 501 TO BE CESIGNE BY THE BU DING MA UFACTUR R 501 600 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BU INC UFACTUR -12 600 601 TO BE CESIGNED BY THE BU DING MA UFACTURR 601 HANGAR /4 10 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4• X - - JJA -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 10 11 A AE -101 3' -D' 7' -0• 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 11 20 A AE -10 3' -0' T -0' 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 20• 21 A AE -101 3' -0' 7' -0" 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - .r 21 30 A AE -101 3' -0" 7' -0' 1 3/4" X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - PS o 30 31 A AE -10 3' -0" 7' -0" 1 3/4' X - - • 1/4 -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - z 31 40 A AE 101 7'- ' 1 /4' X - • 1// -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - G 40 41 A AE -10 7'- • 1 j /4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 41 50 A AE- 10' -�' 7' -' 1 4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/4-601 - 1 X - - - 50 51 A AE -101 3' -0• 7' -0' 1 3/4' X - - • 1/A -601 1/A -601 - 1 X - - - 0- 100 51 TO BE ESIGNED BY THE BULDING MANUFACTUR R 100 101 TO BE DESIGNED TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BULDING BY THE BU MANUFACTUR DING MA1UFACTU MANUFACTUR R R R v 101 200 20J 200 201 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BULDING 300 TO BE CESIGNED TO BE C ESIGNED BY THE BULDING BY THE BU MANUFACTUR -DING MANUFACTUR R R y� 301 _301 400 TO (IF CESIGNFp BY THE RU DING MANUFACTU' R 400 _01 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BU SING MANUFACTUR R 401 _500 TO BE DESIGNED BY THE BU DING MANUFACTUR R 500 501 TO BF CESIGNED BY THE 811 DING MANUFACTU' R 501 • DOOR TYPES NOTES: DOOR FRAMES 2" D.O. ,;2' v DOORS AND FRAMES TO BE FACTORY PRIME PAINTED FOR FUTURE FIELD FINISHING W/ LATEX PAINT. FINISH FLOOR OFLUSH 4 7/8' TYP. U.N.O. 5/8" 1/2;;1 5/8' JAMB 6' PROVIDE DOUBLE STUD 0 JAMBS (TYP.) METAL STUDS SEE PLAN & DTLS. FOR WIDTH H.M. FRAME w/ 3 MTL STUD ANCHORS PER JAMB 0 INSIDE CLOSURE TRIM. GIRT G. B. WHERE OCCURS, W/ MTL. J MOULD. -1-141P Bud H.M. DOOR NOTE: PROVIDE SEALANT FRAME 0 FRAME PERIMETER BOTH SIDES. 0 STUD WALLS - HEAD SIM. STUD LINE WAILS 6' FRAME HEAD 0 METAL PANEL WALLS - JAMB SIM. DOOR JAMB /HEAD DETAIL SCALE: 3 " =1' -0' A -601 TYP. LOCATION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED DOOR (WD. OR HM) PLAN- DETAIL TYP. DOOR LOCATION SCALE: 3/4' =1' -0' NOTE: "BEST" LOCKS IS ONLY APPROVED MANUFACTURER OF LOCKSETS /CYLINDERS /CORES. TYPICAL DOOR HARDWARE MOUNTING HEIGHT B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY NOOTAVEST .s.D. IMO.a[i.r7pyil aMa WE Ia. Erna. wA....a.• womItemodim CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ‘. 44555, fiWriil Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED CynNhia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.noud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT DOOR SCHEDULE/DOOR DETAILS DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: CAR CAD FILE N0. 769AE601.DWG CHECKED BY: NSF DATE: 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. AE601 NOTE: Layout or h.ada and plpine on IrrlgatIon plan Is dlagramatle. All pipe* and valves .hown In paved or bulIdtrg areas ere for clarity only. Install In appropriate planting areas par .pacing as called on in irrigation .ITedule. 8 Issued for Permit per ER 110 1/22/02 -A Issued for Bid per ER j8 NARK ice" =— ��� O I I ra ti 4, = - _ _ I1 II' ;N r�+ .�'�MORA '. ��✓ fai : -. . tar Z .Z-Z.Z:Z1[Za-ZZi-7rama- �: =_ �: r1l!,eu_L_l _ e lir P 1700 REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY CO MT.T61.CCa..pe KtO1®e.CeeTAKTO S mum= REIM MOO VITUINATIMAL TI WA 165!{470{ SCO cCRi T3 HO SUR BEFORE YOU DIG 1. 8004245555 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT IRRIGATION PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER 18.1. PROJECT NO. DRAWN Br: DRAWN K.K. CHECKED BR CHECKED K.K. DATE: DATE 11 -15 -01 scAt.E: cru r 01- 576901 CO A nu N0. KM— IRRIGATION -01 DRAWING N0. LI -101 NOTES: I. Contractor to confirm avtlable water pressure (Min. 60 psi) and supply (60 GPM) prior to work 2. Controller ehall be Rain Bird E5P -LX Pius -24 Stations Install wall mount Inside building ae Instructed by owner /landecape architect. 3. Landscape architect reserves the right to request minor field adJustmente 10 be made by contractor to comply with overall design intent. 4. General contractor to provide all cleaving at 24" depth at locations Indicated and run a minimum 12" beyond edge of concrete /asphalt pavement /curb. 5. General contractor to provide 120 Volt. AC. service In I" PVC conduit at 24" depth from electric eervice panel to controller. 6. Layout of heads and piping on Irrigation plan Is dlagramatic. All plpes and valves shown in paved or building areas are for clarity only. Install In appropriate planting areas per epacing ae called out In irrigation ehedule. 1. Verify location and depth of all utilities and services prior to any digging. Notiry owner's representative of any dlecrepancle.s between exteting bite conditions and proposed design prior to construction E. All wires and piping under paved areas shall be installed In Sched. 40 PVC eleeveo. S. All lines shall be tfroughly flubbed out prlor to probeure teat and installation of heads or other equipment. 10. AdJuot and relocate Irrigation lines and sprinkler gads ae neccesoary to obtain full coverage and restrict potential overthrough. 11. Each control valve shall be Installed In an approved valve box (Max. two per box) 12. Place pipe at a 24' depth Avoid placing under paved areas If paeeible. Staking of head') to be approved by landscape architect. 13. System to be winterized by use of ccmpreeeed air at the quick coupler by PRY. Open control valves, apply air pressure gradually and open ball valve elowly to avoid harm to the system. 14. Place 2x2x24' pressure treated stakes painted red at all quick coupler location In .Frub /groundeover beds. 15. 3/4" marual drain valve to be placed at the end of the main line and at all low point* with a 2 CF. gravel Bump and a 6" PVC sleeve with a lid. 16. All electrical wiring ')bail be a different color than ground wire. .411 wires shall be placed In pipe trenches per spec. and details. 11. Each valve shall be connected to a separate contrail wire with one extra wire per zone as a spare. 18. Coordinate the 120 volt A.C. power supply hook -up to the controller. This work shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed electrician 19. The NUJ Council AMA Cross Connection Commtttss Manual governs all backflow preventer issues and le Included in the reference material for Divisions 2 and 15 of the epecificatione. 20. Contractor to obtain service* of an approved badkrlow preventer test agency to Inspect, teat and certlry completed installation and provide certification to the owner. 21. Electric remote - control valves to be plastic In a plastic valve box. Set valve. at required pressure to operate heads at their required psi. 22. Box for RPBPA to be Insulated and have a 18' heat tape skip with a IS Ga. Aluminum rifle-top design. Outside dimensions are 44'wXI5•d■25 Vitt provide typical outdoor electrical outlet on a GPI protected circuit mounted a rkt Y off the pipe and 6' above the highest point or discharge. 23. For other Installation details, see proJsct marruaL WIC CCNECTORD (CONIECTI TO De MADE DT vALVE) !t.I 1 •C VALVE NC FEMALE °° To 1 ••ER FOR 11 61. TOR TRANNTIOx TO FRaI'[R De r WC OenN M WM. %LLTILN WO ITO OnCR VALVED ON •AMe CONTROLLE•l NOTED TAPE Alp DUI! ti M EVERT 1D PIET PROMO, 000007ICN COILS AT EACH WIQ C0IECTION N VALVE DOx TEMP MW:41 0 26 PIPE D TEE0) =TACT WI. AR240 VALVE DOx TO SAPS DENSITY AO INDIOTUROED ADJACENT cal ALL THREADED CONECTIONO TO ea COATED alTN TEFLON TAPE. P 004 GIIAD0 N RAGED DOD• PLACE TOP OP DON LEVEL WIM TOP OF MACH CO(TROL WIRE OGEE em Pre ELL TO CONTRO.0.0* PLC 0000 DO *Pie (LOGIN M RE00IFD) MANL.0 RTTNG MAN [WRY LSD REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ASSEMBLY LA4.0 !CAI.E, NOT To SCALE ELEVATION 711.9E Box DACKP 00 PREVENTER 150ErleLT 7A1VE aloe COUPLNG VALVE /OGVA SETALL N LOOCW VALVE COX MAN APE TO 016TOT WAD MAN LIME TO SYSTEM NE U MASTER VALVE N BOX NEW DAOFL00 PRENENIER N VALVE CRA'BER PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE POINT OF CONNECTION SCHEMATIC LA4.0 NOT TO SCALE SECTION PLAN VIEW MACK COUP PG vALVI lb' M AE PTA GRAAL N' x ND` DALY pp! STAKE UN 2 STAPLES. VEIL CLA11.1 DRAG') 40 N0RI (4.ENGT11 AS QOIA ®) 0000040 EL (I CPL P.E. OC4ED OD PUMA (0" LD7TN) INC MARLS" PIPS PRO.ID2 CM eRA•S 1W VG WOE OA PvC TEE OR MOOD PeC 2Ge.D e0 NIPPLE rl' LENGTH) OCIED00 P.Ca PVC Dal= e0 NIPPLE (Y LENGTH! QUICK COUPLING VALVE ASSEMBLY NOT TO SCALE Ot KNISH GRADE 02 WALL (70147 =MROLLER 03 4-x4• ELECT.DOx FOR 00 VOLT, AO CYCLE POWER •I0RT 00 PO:2R DIRGE ARRESTOR NTER10TIC MCC. 102401 I.IGMNG APPESTOR OA r ee-1 FECOr0'ENDED OUNCE ARi1°6TOR N ANCTION DON. 0 00 VOLT. 60 CYCLE POUER SUPPLY N =err. NSTILL PER LOCAL CODE ® CRMloCATI(N CABLE COt0tm • eIa AS REQUIRED. 07 FEMME CCNTROLL PLUG NOTE. CAAUPO SACKS a2ERIC NOTALLATION GAY CONTROLLER DETAIL NOT TO ecM.B Wei w•)• Equipment Schedule Pipe Schedule SYMBOL Nome INDIAN 101110-U• MAT PROWS CO MAL) - D!- r r• r1, rrp.4A Schedule 40 PVC r1, Ig•••••pn -Sq r we • Nw -+-vwh r •4 • 001••••••• r on • 11106-4••••14 r w O 100•4•vx.. r - • DDDi •w+4l le w• . DD•••••••q r u 0 r0•.n F* r ew • ISDP-••••re•ID le WP e 006- ••'Pr► •OR r e0 op""NT If tip ••••••p•MSI r bp • 00••••••'F••424 r es • 1101.o -Fo-•n r • • D/••••-p• -N se s• 11 •T•-Mq l• r S. III0••14••••11q r is • •p-.A•Tw.S(q r ,. A Dbf0.T404# I• b ! ?4#C4449 ID b 0 T-•404 4 w •• SECTION PLAN VIEW MACK COUP PG vALVI lb' M AE PTA GRAAL N' x ND` DALY pp! STAKE UN 2 STAPLES. VEIL CLA11.1 DRAG') 40 N0RI (4.ENGT11 AS QOIA ®) 0000040 EL (I CPL P.E. OC4ED OD PUMA (0" LD7TN) INC MARLS" PIPS PRO.ID2 CM eRA•S 1W VG WOE OA PvC TEE OR MOOD PeC 2Ge.D e0 NIPPLE rl' LENGTH) OCIED00 P.Ca PVC Dal= e0 NIPPLE (Y LENGTH! QUICK COUPLING VALVE ASSEMBLY NOT TO SCALE Ot KNISH GRADE 02 WALL (70147 =MROLLER 03 4-x4• ELECT.DOx FOR 00 VOLT, AO CYCLE POWER •I0RT 00 PO:2R DIRGE ARRESTOR NTER10TIC MCC. 102401 I.IGMNG APPESTOR OA r ee-1 FECOr0'ENDED OUNCE ARi1°6TOR N ANCTION DON. 0 00 VOLT. 60 CYCLE POUER SUPPLY N =err. NSTILL PER LOCAL CODE ® CRMloCATI(N CABLE COt0tm • eIa AS REQUIRED. 07 FEMME CCNTROLL PLUG NOTE. CAAUPO SACKS a2ERIC NOTALLATION GAY CONTROLLER DETAIL NOT TO ecM.B REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SCHEDULE: RCV Number 2 3 4 5 • 6 8 8 10 II 12 FLOW (GPM) 209 11.5 133 28.9 63 13.0 532 1235 253 14.95 199 99 SIZE 1 1/2' I• I V2' 0 -10 1 1/2' 10 ID RCV hAmber 13 14 B 16 n 18 15 20 21 22 23 24 FLOW (GPM) 128 29.5 21.0 24.0 4.2 14.95 B1, 131,5 52 0 0 0 SIZE l0 I V2' IVY 1 1/Y 1' ll N 0 0 0 PIPE SIZE SCHEDULE: FLOW (GPM) 0 -10 10.18 15 -20 over 28 2 PIPE SIZE (INCH) 3/4 1 1 V4 B Issued for Permit per ER #10 1/22/02 A Issued for Bid per ER #8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN • COMPANY cosSILTADSHIGE- DIapleeals-LI STACT0D1 NORDSVEdf REGION 1.707 DnmMAT10NAL BLVD. WO SOS SWIM 1/04744K0 �- Innmfternacs • CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ` 1. 800424,5555 APPROVED Cyrdhb Stewart AIRPORT MANAOER Rlak Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT IRRIGATION DETAILS DESIGNED Ira DESIGNER .LS.L PRDJECT N0. 01- 576201 DRAWN Br: DRAWN KK. CHECKED BT! CHECKED KK. DATE: DATE 11 -15 -01 CAD FOE 140. KAA-IRRIGATION -01 DRAWWO N0. LI -102 0 Equipment Schedule Pipe Schedule SYMBOL Nome SYMBOL Pipe Schedule Size Point of connection: see detail sheet Main Line Schedule 40 PVC As noted A Dion P.O.G �� RCV NO. S Remote Control Vdve Lateral Line Schedule 40 PVC As noted on Wan NIA •i Ouiei Couples 9eeve Schedule Schedule 40 PVC As noted Woe Monnud orals Vdve REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SCHEDULE: RCV Number 2 3 4 5 • 6 8 8 10 II 12 FLOW (GPM) 209 11.5 133 28.9 63 13.0 532 1235 253 14.95 199 99 SIZE 1 1/2' I• I V2' 0 -10 1 1/2' 10 ID RCV hAmber 13 14 B 16 n 18 15 20 21 22 23 24 FLOW (GPM) 128 29.5 21.0 24.0 4.2 14.95 B1, 131,5 52 0 0 0 SIZE l0 I V2' IVY 1 1/Y 1' ll N 0 0 0 PIPE SIZE SCHEDULE: FLOW (GPM) 0 -10 10.18 15 -20 over 28 2 PIPE SIZE (INCH) 3/4 1 1 V4 B Issued for Permit per ER #10 1/22/02 A Issued for Bid per ER #8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN • COMPANY cosSILTADSHIGE- DIapleeals-LI STACT0D1 NORDSVEdf REGION 1.707 DnmMAT10NAL BLVD. WO SOS SWIM 1/04744K0 �- Innmfternacs • CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ` 1. 800424,5555 APPROVED Cyrdhb Stewart AIRPORT MANAOER Rlak Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT IRRIGATION DETAILS DESIGNED Ira DESIGNER .LS.L PRDJECT N0. 01- 576201 DRAWN Br: DRAWN KK. CHECKED BT! CHECKED KK. DATE: DATE 11 -15 -01 CAD FOE 140. KAA-IRRIGATION -01 DRAWWO N0. LI -102 0 f \\III //4 ///1I111\\\� //41m / *blll \! \ �I II HANGER I _ \\IIIII / \\\\ \III / / / \\\ \III/ / //� ROCKER I -; in I �x (___\ 10 //4811% � % � / /iIIII►►\ \\\� /4/ Parking P S MANGER 02 erking tails plus 1 NC. Accesslb ROCKER at4 1-L4NGER 50' 25' 0 50' I-LANGER 02 X 10 Parking stele pbe I ac. Accessibi x —� 71‘\7‘"1 611 -154 ••• S • 100' 0 oull/ SIP }_ .;..:. :.::,...,:::..:.:...,,:,:.���. HANGER RIVER COBBLE - 6• • : UN WEED CGNTROL MAT 50' 25' 0 50' 100' Landscape Requirements by City or Tukwila Code: Planting In Parking Area (22 Stalls), minus 10 % credit, Required 3% SF. Provided 461 SF. Planting In Perimeter Landscape: for 2640 LF. at 10' wide : 26,400 SF. Required. 21,738 SF. Provided • Coverage Area x } i ! . :iilii�i_. ii l Gfii i 1-i 1- - F E� H 4 1- MI11111" .-- IF B Issued for Permit per ER 1110 1/22/02 A Issued for Bid per ER 118 12/11/01 DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS a THE AUSTIN ■ COMPANY menun..,n,mu,.aoorau . a..uue,a•a NORTHWER ROOM u X DITERIKTKOLO. KM KIKI KO at,. :tut ay -• GQ T _.4t. ∎ crareaa . CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ` 800.42 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rkk Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN (1) DESIGNED BY J.S.L PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: K.K. CAD FILE NO. KM–RANTING-01 DRAWING NO. LP -101 CHECKED BY: K.K. 01-17-02 ROCKERY Issued for Permit 01 02 Coverage Area /2111 tt0 50' 25' 50' s_ softes 10G.Cy 7 pO�Owrp� ` � O •� ������� 1.117, RIVER COBBLE -6' CONTROL MAT WITH WEED NANO E -6' DEEP URTH WEED • 50' 25' 0 50' 100' 100' E AUSTIN • COMPANY • Vwn•O0e10)u•emawe•RieRRW,016 IIMMIWEIT MOON 1000 •115tlU7tl1YL .VD aNR e00 �ItR� CAI.Hs HOURS BEFORE Y APPROVED Cynthia S•warf AIRPORT MANAGER Riel Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN (2) DESIGNED BYI J.S.L PROJECT N0. DRAPRI BY: K.K. CHECKED BY: K.K. DATE: 01 -17 -02 SCALE: 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE N0. KM— PIANTNG -01 DRAWING N0. LP -102 8 Issued for Permit per ER .10 1/22/02 A issued for Bid per ER 18 12/11/0 DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS E AUSTIN • COMPANY • Vwn•O0e10)u•emawe•RieRRW,016 IIMMIWEIT MOON 1000 •115tlU7tl1YL .VD aNR e00 �ItR� CAI.Hs HOURS BEFORE Y APPROVED Cynthia S•warf AIRPORT MANAGER Riel Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL. AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PLANTING PLAN (2) DESIGNED BYI J.S.L PROJECT N0. DRAPRI BY: K.K. CHECKED BY: K.K. DATE: 01 -17 -02 SCALE: 01- 5769D1 CAD FILE N0. KM— PIANTNG -01 DRAWING N0. LP -102 PLANTING MATERIALS: TREE: PLANT SELECTION LIST STMB. BOTANICAL NAME CCN'4'1ON NAME 512E QTT CONDITION 411 u yr6.G C. PRIddJS SERRJLATA IOUNNZAN KWANZAN FLOWERING CHERRY 415' CAL. 6 B 1 B s ' Q CEDRUS ATLANTICA GLALCA ATLAS CEDAR 10'.l2' WT. 18 5 4 B (c) ABELIA GRANDIFLORA EDWARD GAUC4ER ABELIA 2N -24' 51 .`� CORALS KOJSA KOUSA DOGI1.Gi'7D 10-12' HT. 1 B 11 B ' STYRAX JAPONICUS J4PANESE 51SA:1ELL 315' CAL 9 B 4 B 0 MAHONIA AOUIFOLILM'COMPACTA' COMPACT OREGON GROPE 18'•21' 36 ® AZALEA EXBURT STRAWBERRY ICE EXE!ERY AZALEAA7AI EA 2N -24' 52 SHRUB SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QT7 CONDITION 0 BER3ER15 TNLNEERalI 'ATROF »W'. REA' RED-LEAF JAPANESE BARBERRY 21' -24' 21 Towien FRAGARIA CHILCENSIS IULD STR4 ERRY 4' POT LW OZ Fv/J VDJLA MPIOR (c) ABELIA GRANDIFLORA EDWARD GAUC4ER ABELIA 2N -24' 51 0 CORNUS STOLONFER.4 'KELSEY!' DWARF REDTWIG DOGWOOD I8' -21' I11 O ESCALLONIA R IBRA ESCALLONIA 21' -24' 20 0 MAHONIA AOUIFOLILM'COMPACTA' COMPACT OREGON GROPE 18'•21' 36 ® AZALEA EXBURT STRAWBERRY ICE EXE!ERY AZALEAA7AI EA 2N -24' 52 (..) RHODODENDRON 'PJM' P.M RHODODENDRON 2N -24' 51 * HYDRANGEA AICMALA C ME G HYDRAMSEA 3 GAL 24 ■ GROUNDCOVER SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONDITION L ARCTOSTAPNTLOS WA -URSI K?NI• 1(1MIRK 4' POT ID' oz. Towien FRAGARIA CHILCENSIS IULD STR4 ERRY 4' POT LW OZ Fv/J VDJLA MPIOR PERRIN:EE 4' POT 18' cm „;'':: SODDPYs LOPS' LO• PA STAKE. PREIERIATI t TREATED .TAW DARK DRDYN !) PER TRW COIL DDTAR= CABLE PLAG. .+OaAPID aDE .' SAW MLCN A. »4 EARN ISCER REND.• ALL MAPPINGS AND nl4.P PROM TOP .ALP CP BALL n Of PCOM*11. TREE PLANTING/STAKING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE BE.00 Rt OTBALL CONIFER STAKING DETAIL L42 0 BLACK • RIMER NOSE : 4T16.406 9 GALV. W• SET ROOTBALL CROCK AT FRIGHT SET AT wRSERT SCARRT PIT WALL. AND 6D7TCM P44W WOOS SOU. 41*. TATTED SL.'PCRT 110.60 DEER ROOT BALL 140.1E5■ 1 COMMITS PLANT LOCATE:6B At0 IRRIDATKH NEADPPETENALVE ETC. LOCATICNO TO O.MNATS POTENTIAL COAICTG T. NO PLANT awaro,f aIA (.738 OR VARIETY) OR 046SO4$ ua.ES, APPROVED PROM TO PLJNRtl BY CANER • ALL 4.•YN. ONUS OR0DEP4.£R AREAS TO RECEIVE A' OP TOP SOU - 4 SCARrr PAWL TO A DEP116 CP A' MO MCC N TOPSOC TO A MIL DEMN CP 4' NTO Sue.olL • TOPb OP ISAPIKROP16011. MR SOD M 10 <n r BOLO. R.ON GRADE CP w ALL maxim BEDS TO RECEIVE PGK 4' OP BARK P46-OL L PLM0 OR08000VER. ON TRI NTALAR SR4C.42. • SEE CITE DR41•13e Mb GR4 414 . UT3ZrtM • • SHRUB PLANTING 4044.!. NDT TO WALE Issued for Perm1T per ER /10 1/22/02 Issued for Bid per ER 18 12/11/01 MARK DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY EORDEYIST III ION 1084 ICTERILTIOSAL Gums, A Nos p CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG APPROVED CynR,b Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Pick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PLANTING DETAILS L1ESIa1ED BY: J.S.L PROJECT NO. DRAWN Bit K.K CHECKED BY: K.K. DATE: 01 -17 -02 01- 076901 CAD ME NO. NIA—PLANTING-01 DRA NNO NO. LP -1f3 O GENERAL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 1EDg! RECTANGULAR GATT. FIRST NUMBER INDICATES SIZE FOR SIDE SHOWN 2. 17 1 +VOi�_ ® DUCT SHOWN IN SECTION. ARROW POINTS TO SIDE CALLED OUT FIRST 6 7w 9 ROUND DUCT, NUMBER INDICATES DIAMETER 1...7!_., THERMOSTAT Q� SUPPLY NR DUCT, SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR ELBOW FACING TOWARDS FLOOR DUN TEMPERATURE SENSOR DUCT MOUNTED {E f"�1 NR DUCT. SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR ELBOW FACING AWAY INSSUPPLY T i {�F HUMIDITY SENSOR MOUNTED EXHAUST, RETURN OR SUPPLY AIR DUUCT ROUND. ELBOW FACNC TOWARDS � M��/W 1-`� NDU 110+1 WASTE RETURN OR SUPPLY AIR DUCT ROUND, ELBOW FACING AWAY MI.EXHAUST, DUCT MOUNTED amEXHAUST AIR OR RETURN AIR DUCT. SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR, ELBOW FACING TOWARDS TRAP PRIMER ;■n EXHAUST AIR OR RETURN AIR DUCT, SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR ELBOW FACING AWAY PIPE PLUG J L TRANSITION RECTANGULAR TO RECTANGULAR LEI T �.._I 6 K Gil` L TRANSITION SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR TO ROUND OR OVAL -'15 MOTOR OPERATED VALVE DUCT OFFSET UP OR DOWN -TOT- IxgrA -r �I - �- I� { Iii OPPOSED BLADE DAMPER T1- MME DAMPER UNION, FLANGED -III- UNION. SCREWED DUCT DAMPER MOTOR OPERATED (ELECTRIC OR PNEUMATIC) SWING CHECK VALVE WITH FLOW }t 4" Ae ACCESS DOOR (AD) OR ACCESS PANEL (AP) - - 1SD ERE/SMOKE DAMPER NN WITH TURNING VANES SQUARE ELBOW `IZ `/� /�'/ v FLEXIBLE DUCT {v FLEXIBLE DUCT CONNECTION i ■ 1 io=n io=n,, tm ayQy SOEWALL SUPPLY NR DIFFUSER GRILLE OR REGISTER µD CFM NR FLOW 0....-4,- KO DM SIDEWALL RETURN /EXHAUST NR GRILLE OR REGISTER AND NR FLOW SUPPLY 01.11111, CEILING TYPE. DIFFUSER OR GRILLE. SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR MD CFY AIR FLOW (4 TYP) -- I A Imo- EXHNIST REG151ER 0N. GIRDLE, CEILING DUCT TYPE AND CFM AIR FLOW LEGEND GENERAL SYmBOI DESCRIPTION LU -- L wart HEATER HORIZONTAL _ SUPPLY NR ROW (ERECT 0N) M° RETURN. COME OR EXHAUST NR FLOW (DIRECTION) —N---- TQ THERMOSTAT Q� HUMIDISTAT FLOOR DUN TEMPERATURE SENSOR DUCT MOUNTED {E f"�1 CE�R IN -1NE REORCULARNC PUMP T i {�F HUMIDITY SENSOR MOUNTED � E ®�}�=1,.HDUCT DOH HUMIDLY UMrt SENSOR DUCT MOUNTED 1-`� NDU 110+1 WASTE STATC PRESSURE SENSOR SPRINKLER LINE DUCT MOUNTED SANITARY WASTE GENERAL MOLL DESCRIPTION -4 1-- BREAK IN PIPE j CROSSINIG LINES, NO CONNECTION M° DIRECTION OF FLOW CLEW OUT. WALL snvY DIRECTION OF SLOPE, DOWN FUNNEL FLOOR DRAIN EOUPMENT MARK NURSER FLOOR DUN HIDDEN OR BELOW CRAZE FLOOR SINK -T IN -1NE REORCULARNC PUMP - 1HD PONT OF CONNECTION �VPOC VAV BOX NUMBER WASTE FITTINGS SYMBOL 01501PTOT 44, 1/4 BEND CLEAN OUT, EXPOSED ----II CO M° CLEAN OUT. FLOOR CLEW OUT. WALL -I 11C0 CI RD FUNNEL FLOOR DRAIN Q FD FLOOR DUN CI rs FLOOR SINK -41- LATERAL - 1HD WYE AND 1/8 BEND, SHOWN 111111 CLEW OUT PIPE IDENTIFICATION max DESCRIPTION -CHMR- CHILLED WATER RETURN -CAMS- CHILLED WATER SUPPLY -CIVET- COOING TOWER WATER RETURN -CMS- COOING TOWER WATER SUPPLY -CV- CITY WATER -C - NATURAL CAS —Hn— DOMESTC HOT WATER SUPPLY - HNC- DOMESTIC HOT WATER CIRCULATING -HAIR- HEATING WATER RETURN -HWS- HEATING WATER SUPPLY -IN - NDU 110+1 WASTE -5- SPRINKLER LINE - SAN- SANITARY WASTE - 1P - TRAP PRIMER - V- VENT PIPE FITTINGS m2OL DESCRIPTION - --010- BAND FIANCE -it -17--- EXPANSION JOINT -- FLEXIBLE PIPE CONNECTION AUTONUTC AIR VENT (WIT DRAIN) PIPE ANCHOR )Y TOP + {r PIPE CAP SCREWED OR SOLDER JOINT -4 BUTTERFLY VALVE PIPE CROSS - -'F PIPE ELBOW, 90 LONG RADIUS COOING COL CHILLED WATER PIPE ELBOW, REDUCING -''\ PIPE ELBOW, 45' -TO PIPE ELBOW, TURNED UP OR IOMARD 7 PIPE ELBOW, TURNED DOWN OR AWAY - PIPE GUIDE CATE VALVE, WITH LOSE -001 PIPE PLUG -Id -0-- PIPE REDUCER CONCENTRIC -o- PIPE REDUCER ECCENTRIC NWUAL AIR VENT (WITH DRAIN) - MOTOR OPERATED VALVE PIPE TEE. STRAIGHT -TOT- PIPE TEE, UP OR TOWARD PLUG VALVE PPE TEE, DOWN OR AWAY T1- -HI- UNION, FLANGED -III- UNION. SCREWED GENERAL NOTES 1. LOCATOR OF DUCTWORK 5 0401+9M11C TO SHOW DESIGN INTENT ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ALL DUCTWORK AND PIPING WITH ALL OTHER NEW WORK AND 02STDNG CONDITIONS. IF FIELD CONDITONS DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE SHOWN ON THE DRAWING'S AND AFFECT MECHANICAL WORK. INFORM THE OWNER IMMEDNTELY BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THAT WORK 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTE THE CRITICAL SPACE AVALABE ABOVE CEIUNDS. PROVIDE TRANSITION PIECES AT CROSSOVERS, UNDER 8EA6. OVER/UNDER PIPES, AS REOLARED TO ACCOMMODATE DUCTS WITHIN SPACE AVAILABLE, PROVIDING EQUNAEM DUCT SIZE TO THE DIAMETER SHOWN. COORDINATE CLDSEEY WITH OTHER SECTORS TO REDUCE NECESSITY OF TRANSITIONS TO A MINIMUM, ILO ADDITIONAL COST WILL BE PRO FOR AWE REQUIRED TRANSOIOIS OR THEIR SPECIAL CHANGE SHAPE PIECES 4. PROVIDE SUPPORT AND VIBRATION ISOLATION OF EGXPMEM, DUCT AND PIPING. ALL SESMIC BRACING SHALL BE INSTALLED 04 ACCORDANCE WITH *GUIDE LASS FOR SESMC RESTRAINTS OF MECHANICAL SYS1E16. AS PUBtSHEO BY 51AACNA LATEST ENO/ 5. ALL DUCTWORK SHALL BE GALVANIZED STEEL 6. FOR DUCT CONSTRUCTION LOW AND MEDIUM VELOGtt DUCT CONSTRUCTOR STANDARDS DAIL APPLY WARE INSTALIATON DEINLS OR TECLNOUES ARE NOT COVERED UNDER ULLC, LATEST EDRORE, SEAL DUCT SEAMS AND JOOOS ACCORDING TO THE DUCT PRESSURE CLASS DEDICATED N SMACNA'S *VAC DUCT 016TRUC10N STANDARDS- METAL & FLD081E' PIPING SPECIALTIES mom DESCRIPTION - --010- 2 WAY CONTROL VALVE W/PNEUTATC ACTUATOR ---- 3 WAY CONTROL VALVE W/PNEUMATC ACTUATOR 1 10 ANGLE GLOBE VALVE, ELEVATION / PLAN a'''' AUTONUTC AIR VENT (WIT DRAIN) -(- 81CKROM PREVENTER TOP + {r BAIL VALVE. OPEN / CLOSED -- -I /F-- BUTTERFLY VALVE CALIBRATED PLUG VALVE -i515-- COOING COL CHILLED WATER HUNT VALVE -LOWMETER VENTURI TYPE --- / GATE VALVE. OPEN / CLOSE -A_ CATE VALVE, OUTSIDE SCREW AND YOKE - -DO CATE VALVE, WITH LOSE -001 GLOBE VALVE. OPEN / CLOSED --01S2- HEATING COIL / $ LIT CHECK VALVE 7A 441 NWUAL AIR VENT (WITH DRAIN) - MOTOR OPERATED VALVE tHOK PETES PLUG, WITH BALL VALVE -C4O-p- PLUG VALVE 1 PRESSURE GAUGE WITH VALVE I 1 PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE W /EXT PRESS TAP 83 PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE / SAFETY VALVE -TRH- SWING CHECK VALVE WITH FLOW }t THERMOMETER LINE MOUNT ❑IP TRAP SEAL PRIMER VALVE ~' WYE STRAINER (WITH DRAIN VALVE) • x O A AD AF AFF AFUE AFT/1 N L0 ARCH ARRG AS AWE EDP BHP BLOC 81UH co, CAL CCW CENT CFM CH 04* CMYP CHYR CHAPS 0 co COL COMP COAST COAT COP CP CTR CTS CV CW 08 DOC 0ET DI DA OFF DM DST DN DO DWG EAT EER EF EFF EC ELECT ENT ER ESP EVAP EWC DOI EWT FCL FCO FD FED FPI F5D FT FVS CAL GA GPH GPM H2O FIB w HLS HP HR HS H6PF RUC ABBREVIATIONS POUND PERCENTAGE AT NR ACCESS COON AIR FLIER ABMNE FN5HED FLOOR ANNUAL FUEL UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY NR HANDLBX: UNIT ANALOG INPUT ANALOG OUTPUT ARCHITECTURAL ARRANGEMENT NR SEPARATOR AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS 8ACKFLOM PREVENIER BRAKE HORSEPOWER BUILDING BRITISH THERMAL UNITS CONDENSATE COMPRESSED NR CALIBRATION COUNTER CLOCKWISE CENTRFUGAL CUBIC FEET PER MINUTE CHILLER CHILLED WATER CHILLED WATER PUMP CARED WATER RETURN CHILLED WATER SUPPLY CAST RON CLEANOUT COLUMN COMPRESSOR CONSTRUCTION CONTINUATOR COEFFICIENT OF PERFORMANCE MRCMAH N PUMP CI 01040 TOWER WATER RETURN COOING TOWER WATER SUPPLY CONTROL VALVE COLD WATER. CLOCKWISE DRY BULB DIRECT DOTAL CONTROL DETAIL DIGITAL INPUT DIAMETER DIFFERENTIAL DINDIDON DISTANCE D N/N DIGITAL OUTPUT DRAWNC ELECTR0 ACTUATOR ENTERING NR TEMPERATURE ENERGY EFFICIENCY RATIO EXFWl5T Fµ EFFCENCY EXHAUST GRILLE ELECTRICAL ENTER/0 DDUIIST REGISTER EXTERNAL STATIC PRESSURE EVAPORATOR ELECTRIC WATER COOLER ENTERING WATER TEMPERATURE EXHAUST EX5TNG FAHRENHEIT FLOM METER CALIBRATION LAB FLOOR CLEANOUT FLOOR GRAN FUNNEL FLOOR IRAN FINS PER NCH FIRE/SMOKE CARPER FIN TUBE, FEET, FOOT FAGS VELOCITY SENSOR GALLON GAUGE GALLONS PER HOUR GALLONS PER MINUTE HAMERR. HECHT WATER HOSE 1088 HIGH HON HUMIDITY LRRT SENSOR HORSEPOWER HOUR HAIM' SENSOR HEATING SEASON PERFORMANCE FACTOR HEATING, TAR OONDII0 TINm G a FAY IMP /MR HMS FIX HZ IC0 0 I/o N KW IAT LB LB /HR LVG LOOT 4 rnA MAX MBH MCA MD MECH MFR 11114 MIN 110CP (N) N/A NC NE NO NPT NPW NTS NW CIA ODP OPNG PC PD PH PRE PRESS PROP PRY PSI P51G PSV 0 -0 (R) RH RM RO ROT RPM 5/S SAN SD 5DC0 5E SEER SENS SF SHT 511. SO.LC. SP SPO SIPS SR SS STRICT 5W 5151 TD TEMP 1HRU 1P TS 15P 15T TYP UH V VD VEL VTR 8 W/ WB WF WG WIT WIN. W4L HOT WATER HOT WATER PUMP HOT WATER RETURN HOT WATER SUPPLY HEAT EXCHANGER HERTZ INOUSTRNL COLD WATER INDIRECT OMAN INPUT /OUTPUT INCH KILOWATT LENGTH LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE POUND POUNDS PER HOUR LOWER HEATING VALUE RAVING LEAVING WATER TEMPERATURE MOTOR MAW- AMPERES MAXIMUM 1,000 BRITSH THERMAL UNITS MINIMUM CIRCUIT AMPACIIY MOTORIZED DAMPER MECHANICAL MANUFACTURER MOTOR HORSEPOWER MINIMUM, MINUTE MAX0UM OVERCURRENT PROTECTION NEW NOT APPLICABLE NORMALLY CLOSED NORTHEAST NORMALLY OPEN NATIONAL PIPE THREAD NON POTABLE WATER NOT TO SCALE NORTHWEST OUTSIDE AIR OPEN DRIP PROOF OPENING PUMP PUMPED CONDENSATE PRESSURE DROP PHASE PRELIMINARY PRESSURE PROPERTIES PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH POUNDS PER SQUARE NCH (GAUGE) PRESSURE SAFETY VALVE COOK DSCONNECT FOR REFERENCE ONLY RELOCATED MANE HUMIDITY REVERSE OSMOSIS WATER R00M ROTATION REVOLUTIONS PER 4181110 START/STOP SANITARY SUPPLY DIFFUSER STORM DRAIN CLEW OUT SOUTHEAST SEASONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY RATING SENSIBLE SQUARE FEET SHEET SILENCER SUPPLIED BY OWNER INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR STATIC PRESSURE SPEED STATIC PRESSURE SENSOR SUPPLY REGSIER SINNLE 5 STEEL STRUCTURAL SOUIMYEST sow WIDE SINGLE INLET TRAP TRENCH IRAN TEMPERATURE THROUGH TRAP PRIMER TEMPERATURE 506OR TOTAL STATIC PRESSURE THERMAL STORAGE TANK TYPICAL UNIT HEATER VOLT, VENT VOLUME DAMPER VELOCITY VENT UNTIL ROOF WIDTH TOOTH WET 81AB WATER FLIER WATER CAGE WATER HEATER WATER WIDTH BY HEIGHT B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERIB MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSION S 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN • COMPANY NYIA.TAMIS.I7FiOERI.01i ®.CC OINCIVO 110111NWYT KOCK IKCO aFlsWallDHMI KM, sale FARO 11WAITLK La araFaa CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1100424555 J EMConsulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Mee Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769X1 DRAWN BY: CADD CAD FILE NO. 769140 CHECKED BY: MY! DATE: 10/16/01 22x34 TIILEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE: NONE DRAWING NO. MO THRU WALL HEAT PUMP AEA v m v v /-- EXHAUST FAN W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER UP TO GOOSENECK FITTING ON ROOF LOCALLY CONTROLLED TYPICAL FOR SEVEN m v CEILING EXHAUSTER W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND OUTSIDE GRILLE INTERLOCK W/ UGHT m v v v • m v m v 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' 0 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY OTOMUrn•oases.eo ®.mmcrau 1101011VE1r 1.111011 00:0 110111010110/0L a1/11. MIT 110/ a nr.E�xa� CAI 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 1-800-424-5665 J MTh Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rlek Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 HVAC FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TGT CAD FILE NO. 769MH101.DWC CHECKED BY: WSF DATE 8/14/01 22x34 TTTLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING NO. MH101 CEILING EXHAUSTER W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND OUTSIDE GRILLE INTERLOCK W/ LIGHT r� I I I I LJ v v r1 II I I LJ r1 I I I I LJ AIL lar r1 I I II LJ r1 I I I I LJ NE/ ri I I II LJ EXHAUST FAN W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND OUTSIDE GRILLE LOCALLY CONTROLLED TYPICAL FOR EIGHT r1 I I I I LJ r1 I I I LJ • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERIE 12/11/01 DATE MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS a THE AUSTIN .COMPANY roRa.ls.r 1111101011 .000.TENIKT0..L BLVD. OYI[..n .tA71tL OM OO�6flW s k • I I Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia st...n AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 FNAC FLOOR PLAN (RELOCATED STRUCTURE) DESIGNED BY: DESIGNER PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: TCT CAD FILE NO. 769AE102.DWC CHECKED BY: WSF DRAWING NO. M H102 DA 4/01 SCALE: SHOWN 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) CEILING EXHAUSTER W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND OUTSIDE GRILLE INTERLOCK W/ LIGHT TYPICAL FOR SIX GAS FIRED UNIT HEATER W/ VENT THRU ROOF AND INSULATED THIMBLE TYPICAL FOR SIX TYPICAL FOR SIX } } EXHAUST FAN W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER UP TO GOOSENECK FITTING ON ROOF LOCALLY CONTROLLED TYPICAL FOR SIX I I I I I I I LU LLJ • ri II I LJ u 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER/10 1/22/02 ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m•uT.nl.oEa0•3e.eo•s.mm.c,as YORIIA... UI5 r , 10m I6.N1EIMIL 74 KM WO IATR�I..p�, E- * si7ri/ Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Steered AIRPORT MANAGER RIek Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 HVAC FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY FPW CAD FILE NO. 7691,1H103.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SHOWN DRAWING NO. MH103 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) EXHAUST FAN W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND EXHAUST GRILLE LOCALLY CONTROLLED TYPICAL FOR FIVE CEILING EXHAUSTER W/ BAROMETRIC DAMPER AND OUTSIDE GRILLE INTERLOCKED W/ LIGHT TYPICAL FOR FIVE GAS FIRED UNIT HEATER W/ VENT THRU ROOF AND INSULATED THIMBLE TYPICAL FOR FIVE • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' •• n B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER/8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY MNITMMMTMMEW SMOMMERIMINNWORMUMVOM Illkani A tnsa.a Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia St..ort AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.noud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 HVAC FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: FPW CAD FILE NO. 7691AH104.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 22x34 TLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. MH104 ® ® m ® m AM r-I I I LJ v r1 I I LJ o r'1 11 LJ m r1 1 1 LJ m r-1 1 I LJ • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' •• n B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER/8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY MNITMMMTMMEW SMOMMERIMINNWORMUMVOM Illkani A tnsa.a Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia St..ort AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.noud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 HVAC FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: FPW CAD FILE NO. 7691AH104.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 22x34 TLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. MH104 ROOF LINE ROOF CAP WITH INTEGRAL BIRDSCREEN CURB BY BLDG. MANUFACTURER. COORDINATE SIZE, ORIENTATION AND LOCATION 1/4' THREADED ROD WITH RUBBER —IN —SHEAR ISOLATOR TRANSITION TO ROUND DUCT EXHAUST FAN WITH INTERGRAL BACKDRAFT DAMPER TYPICAL HANGAR EXHAUST FAN DETAIL Scole : NONE • TYPICAL HANGAR EXHAUST FAN CONTROL THE EXHAUST FANS WILL BE CONTROLLED BY SPACE HUMIDITY.PROVIDE A HUMIDISTAT MOUNTED 60 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR AND AT THE POSITION INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. THE HUMIDISTAT WILL CONTROL THE 120 VOLT POWER TO THE FAN MOTOR. THE HUMIDISTAT IS TO BE HONEYWELL H46C1000 OR EOUAL SET THE HUMIDISTAT TO OPERATE THE FAN WHENEVER THE RELATIVE HUMIDITY IS OVER 90%. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER,8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY ms LT.n..CEaaa..es®..mrT CCTm 11101111111137 111311014 sm Wrzfl%1 axt .� BLVD. [ ae. MATT{e...iQ011 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 1400.4245555 l Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER RIek Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT DETAILS AND SECTIONS DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: CADD CAD FILE N0. 769M500 CHECKED BY: FPW DATE: 10/16/01 SCALE: NONE DRAWING NO. M500 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) UNIT HEATER SCHEDULE SYMBOL LOCATION & AREA SERVED AIR FLOW CFM NOMINAL TOTAL HEAT INPUT TOTAL HEAT OUTPUT MAXIMUM MOUNTING HEIGHT UNIT TYPE TYPE OF FAN AIR TEMPERATURE RISE SUPPLY FAN MOTOR REMARKS HP NOMINAL VOLTAGE PHASE HERTZ UH -1 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60,000 14.-0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48T 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD75, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -2 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60.000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48T 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD75, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -3 HANGAR 13 1160 75.000 60,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD75, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -4 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 4.8'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD75, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -5 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 111075, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -6 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1H075, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -6 HANGAR 13 1160 75,000 60,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 48T 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1H075, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -7 HANGAR 14 990 60,000 48,000 14' -0• INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 45'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1H060, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -8 HANGAR 14 990 60,000 48,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 45'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD60, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -9 HANGAR 14 990 60,000 48,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 45T 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD60, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -10 HANGAR 14 990 60,000 48,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 45'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 1HD60, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER UH -11 HANGAR 14 990 60,000 48,000 14' -0' INDIRECT FIRED PROPELLER 45'F 1/12 115 1 60 MODINE MODEL 111060, POWER VENT, 24 VOLT REMOTE TSTAT AND TRANSFORMER 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -16 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 Q ® Q Q EF -17 800 0.10 374 120 1 EXHAUST FAN SCHEDULE MARK CFM • WG ELECTRICAL DATA (WATTS) SONES MODEL REMARKS HP VOLTS PHASE HERTZ AMPS RPM EF -1 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 0 EF -2 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 D Q 0 EF -3 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0000 EF -4 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 0 EF -5 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 Q ® Q Q EF -6 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 Q 8 Q Q EF -7 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 Q ® 0 0 EF -8 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 Q EF -9 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -10 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 Q O Q Q EF -11 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 Q 9 Q EF -12 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 EF -13 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 0 EF -14 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0000 EF -15 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -16 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 Q ® Q Q EF -17 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 0 0 0 0 EF -18 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 0 0 0 Q EF -19 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 OI 0 0 EF -20 800 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 0 0 0 EF -21 B00 0.10 374 120 1 60 - 1625 8.3 COOK GEMINI GC -740 0 Q Q EF -22 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -23 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -24 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -25 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -26 500 0.10 351 120 1 60 - 1075 4.3 COOK GEMINI GC -640 0 0 0 EF -27 100 0.25 70 120 1 60 - 1500 3.0 COOK GEMINI CC -140 0 0 0 Q EF -28 100 0.25 70 120 1 60 - 1500 3.0 COOK GEMINI GC -140 ® 0 0 Q O PROVIDE ROOF CAP W /BIRDSCREEN. O PROVIDE HANGING ISOLATOR KIT WITH RUBBER IN SHEAR INSOLATORS. Q PROVIDE STEEL GRILLE. Q PROVIDE FAN SPEED CONTROL. 0 PROVIDE ROUND DUCT WALL CAP WITH DAMPER. ELECTRIC BASEBOARD HEATER SCHEDULE MARK NO. ELECTRICAL DATA (WATTS) MODEL REMARKS WATTS VOLTS PHASE HERTZ AMPS LENGTH EB -1 750 120 1 60 - 3' BRASCH XMD 230 EB -2 1000 120 1 60 - 4' BRASCH XMD 0 AIR TO AIR HEAT PUMP SCHEDULE MARK NO. ELECTRICAL DATA (WATTS) MARK LOCATION COBTUNG VOLTS AMPS WATTS EER CFM CFM MODEL 120 REMARKS 60 HP -1 HANGAR 11 OFFICE 14,000 230 7.4 1490 9.4 325 50 TRANE PTHC 15 0 © 0 0 0 0 0 O PROVIDE SUBASE KIT. 0 PROVIDE WALL SLEEVE. 0 PROVIDE OUTDOOR GRILLES. 0 PROVIDE 7 -DAY PROGRAMMABLE T -STAT O PROVIDE POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH. Q PROVIDE CONDENSATE DRAIN KIT. 0 PROVIDE POWER DOOR KIT. WITH 5 DEGREE DEADBAND FAN WALL HEATER SCHEDULE MARK NO. ELECTRICAL DATA (WATTS) MODEL REMARKS WATTS VOLTS PHASE HERTZ AMPS CFM FWH -1 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -2 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -3 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -4 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -5 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -6 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FViH -7 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -8 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -9 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -10 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -11 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -12 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -13 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -14 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 F1VH -15 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -16 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -17 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -18 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -19 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -20 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -21 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 FWH -22 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012 PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -23 500 120 1 60 - 65 BRASCH SRA -1012' PROVIDE WITH DOUBLE POLE DISCONNECT FWH -24 1500 208 1 60 - 100 BRASCH FRA -2024 AIR DIFFUSER / REGISTER / GRILLE/LOUVER SCHEDULE NMARK ERE MATERIAL FINISH INLET /NECK SIZE, INCHES MAX. NOISE COEFFICIENT MAX. TP INCH WG. MAXIMUM SET CFM REMARK EL -1 EXHAUST LOUVER ALUMINUM STANDARD 6X6 12 0,04 300 RUSKIN MODEL ELF15S THIN LINE STATIONARY LOUVER 6X6 • • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER/10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY mmtiTYnE•OE101811 •BINIEBO•COMMIOXI 111 11ONTIMEET 11!01011 1000 INTE/0M71011 I OWE .EO EEAme rw EEEq" au 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1800.424 55 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Steered AIRPORT MANAGER Rlck Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT MECHANICAL SCHEDULES DESIGNED BY: FPW PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: CADD CAD FILE NO. 769M600 CHECKED BY: FPW DATE: 10/16/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE: NONE DRAWING NO. M600 r HANGARbRAIN (TYP) I1 20 GALLON ELECTRIC DOMESTIC I WATER — M UN ED ABOVE ITOILET FWC 00M 2' VTR 1 -1/2' DOMESTIC WATER ABOVE GROUND PLUMBING PLAN 2 HAIZAR DRAIN PIPE Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' 2' HANG DRAIN (TYP OF 1 1/2' DOMESTIC 3' HANGAR DRAIN PIPE WATER SUPPLY (TO 01L/WATER SEPARATOR) BELOW GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' • 8' 4' 0 •• B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERj8 12/11/01 MARK REV61ONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 1OaI..aT WOO rI6.M,OML &YD. BATE 200 fATRZ M.' ma HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.4244555 EMI Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 PLUMBING PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY REG CAD FILE N0. 769PL101.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. PL101 22234 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) CD I- 1 -1/2' DOMESTIC WATER 20 GALLON ELECTRIC DOMESTIC WATER HEATER - MOUNTED ABOVE TOILET ROOM r I °I WCO I 2. VTR L J HANGAR DRAIN 19 18 17 16 15 ABOVE GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scale GAR DRAIN PIPE ri I I -1/2' DOME IC LJ TER SUPPL 3' r LJ 2' HANGAR (TYP OF 8 DRAIN 10 9O O8 7 O6 (TYrP)i 11 LJ NGAR DRAIN PIPE 2' HANGAR DRAIN PIPE r1 I I 141 VJ WC LAV 4 SAN, DN. FCO F II 3' HAN DRAIN PIPE (TO OIL ATER SEPARATO BELOW GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scale : 1/16. =1' -0' • 8' 4' 0 8• 16' 24' 32' 40' 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 1/22/02 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY ro1m1119r MOWN 11000 EftERM OKM.t/°. WYE .m E..1LsA .s..+.>. r CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1.800.4245555 Enli Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FlELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 PLUMBING PLAN (RELOCATED STRUCTURE) DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01 -5769D1 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769PL102.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE: 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. PL102 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) 2YfR \GAS METER (BY OTHERS) 3/4' GAS r r 20 GALLON ELECTRIC DOMESTIC WATER HEATER - MOUNTED ABOVE TOILET ROOM - 0 DOMESTIC COLD WATER 4'SAN, UP TO WC ABOVE GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' 4" SAN, UP TO WC L/ f_4 'SAN, UP TO WC �4"SAN, UP TO WC r F ,.,---2-1 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY 4 SAN I WCO �,�I 1 4. Jv� UNIT HEATER (RE , I 'a i ;" s I 4. ~ ^� 1 -1/2Y DEI I( IOW V I 2' CW I o d L r1 1 J 4� FCO 141 SAN LJ r� r1 I I 1 1 LJ r . 2" CW 111 r1 . I I 4' SAN I4 I 1 LJ LJ 2 HANGAR DPAIN r r (TYP OF 6) IX r 1 II 4' FCO L J II / 2' HANGAR I�R�IN PIPE 11 I 1 L 11 2' FCO I I Li I1 II I 1 I 1 LJ LJ 1 I 1 I — — J r1 I I 4 -FCO 1 1 L J r1 11 I L J — _ J r1 11 3/4' CW, DOWNIT0 2 HOSE BIBBS, ONE PER 1R NGAR r1 • 1 1 1 I L J HANGAR DRAIN 0 0 0 0 p� 1 I SANITARY WASTE 8f ENT PIPING DOMESTIC WATER PPG r 1 I (SIMILAR 3 PLACES) 1 (SIMILAR 3 PLACES) 1 1 LJ LJ FCD () j LJ 1 _ 0 00 • 4'SAN, UP TO WC ABOVE GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scale : 1/16' =1' -0' 4" SAN, UP TO WC L/ f_4 'SAN, UP TO WC �4"SAN, UP TO WC r F ,.,---2-1 DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY 4 SAN I 4. rr i�6� 1 _ 4. in 1 4 IOW , r )� 1 aI r1 1 I I I LJ r 4 4 r1 1 J 4� FCO 141 SAN LJ r� r1 I I 1 1 LJ r . r 111 r1 . I I 4' SAN I4 I 1 LJ LJ 2 HANGAR DPAIN r r (TYP OF 6) IX r 1 II 4' FCO L J II / 2' HANGAR I�R�IN PIPE 11 I 1 L 11 2' FCO I I Li I1 II I 1 I 1 LJ LJ 00 2' HANGAR DRAIN PIP�T� 3' HANGAR DRAIN 'PPE TO OIL/WATER SEPARATOR �\ BELOW GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Salle : 1/16` =1' -0' • 2 HANGAR DRAIN PIPE FROM HANGAR 14 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' :: B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY CLI02LTYI. • eM19B..Mle.®Y. fOMIMt'121 1 IMITIMINT RSV. WOO WTTL OMLL.ur., s+1E em WM*wM001.0-.00. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1800.4245555 , Imli Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stover, AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 PLUMBING PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT N0. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE N0. 769PL103.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. PL103 22x34 TfTLEBLOCK (1AUG01) 0 CAS METER (BY OTHERS) 3/4" GAS (TYP 5 PLACES) UNIT HEATER LTYPICAL 5 PLACEVREF) _ _, WATER CLOSET (TYP) LAVATORY (TYP) r-1 101 LJ 2 VTR • F-1 101 LJ 4 -SAN, UP TO!WC wco 4•FCO r, P I FC0 (TY ) SANFTAf;Y WASTE AND VENTLPIPINC (SIMILAR2) ABOVE GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scole : 1/16" =1' -0" 4"SAN, UP TO WC 4" SAN 2" DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY \_ 2" CW r� 1p1 LJ I I r 20 GALLON ELECTRIC DOMESTIC WATER HEATER - MOUNTED ABOVE TOILET ROOK 3/4 D"JOWN TO, 2 HOSE BIBBS r� DOMESTIC WATER PIPING L J (SIMILAR) HANGAR DRAIN (TYP) cr 2" DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLY 1 ,-4-SAN, UP TO VC a 4• 4• SAN Ilerp.1 4" SAN 1 4• Iir ' v V 4 LJ 2" HAN FOR CONTINUATION, SEE SHEET PL103 �J DRAIN PIPE o0 LJ �2 " EGO ( 2" HAN 0 ) DRAIN 1 I I J 2" HANGAR DRAIN (1YP OF 5) PIPE LJ BELOW GROUND PLUMBING PLAN Scole : 1/16' =1' -0' • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER/10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER/18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY aomawn.ou nao•n s ®.coma os 1101•14,011T ,Raaao 1ooO sa%A7 anM1 nrAL w aura Ban Ian 'YAMS. w rrAOs enanomainam ca48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 14300424-5555 EMI Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Rrn.ud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 PLUMBING PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769PL104.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING NO. PL104 0 PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE MARK DESCRIPTION WASTE VENT CW HW MOUNTING HEIGHT GHT MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NUMBER* REMARKS WC WATER CLOSET (HANDICAPPED) 4' 2" 1" -- 17 "•• AMERICAN STANDARD "AFWALL" 2257.103 FLUSH VALVE: DEIANEY 'LC.' 402-1 (1.6 GALLON) SEAT: OLSONITE 95 LAV LAVATORY Ph" 11h" 1W W 34'•• AMERICAN STANDARD "LUCERNE" 0356.421 FAUCET W /GRID DRAIN: AMER. STD. 5402.172H FD FLOOR DRAIN 2" -- -- -- -- JR SMITH 2O05Y W/12" SQUARE TOP, INSTAL DRAIN PIPING WITHOUT TRAP WHA WATER HAMMER ARRESTOR -- -- -- -- -- PRECISION PLUMBING PRODUCTS PR -500 FCO FLOOR CLEANOUT -- -- -- -- -- JR SMITH 403.3L W /NICKEL BRONZE TOP & TAPERED BRONZE PLUG WCO WALL CLEANOUT -- -- -- -- -- JR SMITH 4422C W /ROUND STAINLESS STEEL ACCESS COVER WH DOMESTIC WATER HEATER -- -- 3/4" 4 -- A.O. SMITH DEL -20 20 GALLON CAPACITY ELECTRICAL: 12A 0 208v /tph /60h: 2500W ELEMENT HB HOSE BIBB -- -- 3/4" -- -- CHICAGO 15T, 3/4" W /CHICAGO E27 VACUUM BREAKER • OR OTHER APPROVED •• RIM HEIGHT • r) 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERIE 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS • DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY MMUM ti. h.v.n smo.ne.l.,loh.L OMA 1x.11 I.. .TATTt A iras'"" CALL 48 MIRS BITORE YOU DO 10.4245555 I fi�ifY Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PLUMBING SCHEDULES DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: CADD CAD ALE NO. 769P600 CHECKED BY: FPW DATE: 10/16/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) SCALE: NONE DRAWING NO. P600 n THE DRY SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR THIS HANGAR SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR AN ORDINARY IAZARD OCCUPANEY, PER NFPA 13. II j _II 'DRY' TYPE FIRE1IRISER WITH AIR COMPRESSOR. WALL INDICATOR yALVE, & FIRE DEPT. CONNECTIO OD • B' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' • • B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERR8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE o THE AUSTIN . COMPANY aa.uuwn.o®mea•es.ss•m MODUN MMDMERNMWM .om.oe.nn WIL END. nn: MD W.na.. CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 11004244555 EINZI Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01 —5769D1 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769FX101.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. FX101 22x34 TRIEBLOCK (1A0001) ri I 11 10 O9 C 7 6Q THE DRY SPRINKLER SYSTLM FOR THIS HANGAR SHAD. BE DESIGNED FOR AN ORDINARY HAZARD OCCUP CY PFRI NFPA 13. I I L.1 'DRY' 1�'PE FIRE RISER WITH Al COMPRESSOR, WALL I ICATOR VALVE. & FIRE EPT. CONNECTIO • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS GATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY UMMLTNi..l OMEMI.es.ON.o 1 CI .e1a11MMT Imo. •.m Irtt9.N7O1ML OLM AIIT INO Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyntnle Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R.n.ud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PLAN (RELOCATED STRUCTURE) DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: REC CAD FILE NO. 769FX102.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: r. SHOWN DRAWING NO. FX102 22c34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) /1 • it all v II 1 i L J r I I 1 1 L J ao r1 II 1 I r 1 i 1 I J THE HANGAR ORDINARY NFPA 1 11 1 1 ! 1 L J 00 ■ n 1.1- Ij II II r1 I I I I LJ r, I I L � r1 II I I ' WET' TYPELFIRE RISER W/WALL INDICATOR VALVE & FIRE DEPrL, CONNECTION I I I I L J —— r� I I L J r I I I I WET SPRINKL SHALL BE HAZARD 13. I I 1 1 R SYSTEM FOR THIS L J DESIGNED FOR AN OCCUPANCY PER IJ V • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERj10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .OR •.m rle.M1 oN L a• l=SOO CA U. 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 4 I Iffa Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769FX103.DWC CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING NO. FX103 n n 1 • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' •• B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER #8 12/11/01 LURK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 110111•IN.1119I0II .E1111 .N710..L t.x.. WIZ NO CHILL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG /aariia Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01 —5769D1 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769FX104.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. FX104 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) -.1 VET- TYPE FIRE RISER W/WALL INDICATOR VALVE 1 , I. = I- 1 r FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION r 1 r 1 I I I I - I I I I LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ THE WET SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR THIS HANGAR SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR AN ORDINARY HAZARD OCCUPANCY PER 0 NFPA 13. 0 0 • 8' 4' 0 8' 16' 24' 32' 40' •• B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ERI10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER #8 12/11/01 LURK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 110111•IN.1119I0II .E1111 .N710..L t.x.. WIZ NO CHILL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG /aariia Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 FIRE PROTECTION FLOOR PLAN DESIGNED BY: REG PROJECT NO. 01 —5769D1 DRAWN BY: REG CAD FILE NO. 769FX104.DWG CHECKED BY: FPW DATE 8/14/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. FX104 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) 0 SYSTEM DESIGNATIONS HASH MARKS INDICATE THE QUANTITY OF CONDUCTORS (112 WIRE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED). IF UNMARKED INSTALL 2112 IN 1 /2.CONDUIT PHASE CONDUCTORS NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR(IF REQUIRED) GROUND CONDUCTOR OF REQUIRED) 4G6/7,9,11 3/4 C,318 / PANEL HOME- RUN /CIRCUIT NUMBERS CONDUIT SIZE. NUMBER & SIZE OF CONDUCTORS CONDUIT RUN CONCEALED IN WALLS, ABOVE CEIUNG, OR UNDERGROUND CONDUIT RUN EXPOSED CONDUIT TURNED UP W FLEXIBLE CONDUIT, 3/4' UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 00 EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED (EG. PANELBOARD) C> CCD —G —T —FA — EXISTING RACEWAY TO REMAIN EXISTING RACEWAY TO REMAIN CONSTRUCTION NOTE, EG. NOTE 11 NOTE DESIGNATION, EG. NOTE 12 INDICATES SCOPE OF WORK AND CHANGES TO DRAWING FROM PREVIOUS RELEASE GROUND CONDUCTOR TELEPHONE CONDUIT TELEPHONE CONDUIT DISTRIBUTION PANELBOARD, 208Y/120V, 30, 4W SURFACE MOUNTED o SPECIAL PANEL AS NOTED C>93 PULLBOX AUXILIARY SYSTEMS 4 TELEPHONE OUTLET, WALL MOUNTED AT SAME HEIGHT AS ADJACENT RECEPTACLES B FIRE ALARM PANEL SMOKE DETECTOR E3- FIRE ALARM AUDIO/VISUAL INDICATING UNIT D FIRE ALARM PULL STATION, +48' AFF m aa HEAT DETECTOR FLOW SWITCH TAMPER SWITCH RELAY TELEPHONE CABINET RECEPTACLES DUPLEX,20A,120V,10,2P,3W, PARALLEL BLADE GROUNDED RECEPTACLE • FOURPLEX -2 DUPLEX, 20A,10,2P,3W PARALLEL BLADE GROUNDED, go GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTER TYPE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE 20A, 120V, 10, 2P, 3W PARALLEL BLADE, GROUNDED SINGLE PIN AND SLEEVE RECEPTACLE WITH MOUNTING BOX, 400A. 480V, 30, 4P, 3W. APPLETON 1AJA40134 -400. GENERAL NOTES 1. ENTIRE ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION IN THE HANGAR BAYS AND ADJACENT AREAS SHALL BE PER NEC ARTICLE 513. 2. AU. ELECTRICAL DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT MOUNTED ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE HANGARS SHALL BE MOUNTED USING A METHOD APPROVED BY THE HANGAR MANUFACTURER 3. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM DEVICES ARE SHOWN 014 PLAN DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DEVICES AS REQUIRED PER NFPA 72 AND THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, AND ALL WIRING FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FILL BRANCH CIRCUIT CONDUITS TO MORE THAN 50% OF FILL INDICATED IN TABLES IN APPENDIX 'C' OF THE NEC. ossb EQUIPMENT / DEVICES SINGLE POLE TOGGLE SWITCH, 20A, 120 -277V TWO SINGLE POLE TOGGLE SWITCHES IN A 2 -GANG BOX 20A, 120 -277V. 'o DENOTES FIXTURES DESIGNATED 'o' ARE CONTROLLED BY SWITCH 'a $u MOTOR RATED SWITCH, WITHOUT OVERLOADS EP DISCONNECT SWITCH, NON- FUSED, 30A. 3 -POLE. 600V RATED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ® MANUAL MOTOR STARTER WITH OVERLOADS AND PILOT LIGHT 01 COMBINATION STARTER, CIRCUIT BREAKER TYPE, 600V RATED, 3 -POLE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE • ENCLOSED CIRCUIT BREAKER SIZE AS NOTED ON DRAWING, 240V RATED, 3 -POLE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE DISCONNECT SWITCH, 600V RATED, 3 -POLE, FUSED, 60= SWITCH RATING, 50 =F11SE RATING MOTOR, 120V, 10, SIZE AS NOTED MOTOR, 208V, 30, SIZE AS NOTED Q) JUNCTION BOX, FIELD SIZED OR AS NOTED 0 GROUND ROD GROUNDING PIGTAIL GROUND ROD WITH AIRCRAFT GROUNDING RECEPTACLE, CADWELD IB -165 OR EQUAL. INDICATES WALL MOUNTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT CALLOUT (X =TYPE) (N =ID NUMBER) PHOTOCELL . MANUAL MOTOR STARTER, 240V RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ED KEYPAD CONTROL STATION LIGHTING e FIXTURE TYPE DESIGNATION AND QUANTITY AND RATING S1 OF LAMPS. SEE UGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE. (A =TYPE, 2= QUANTITY, 32 =LAMP RATING) 2'x4', 3 -LAMP, RECESSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE, TYPE AS NOTED. 1'x4', 2-IMP, FLUORESCENT FIXTURE. TYPE AS NOTED. ® 1 x8', 2 -LAMP, FLUORESCENT FIXTURE. TYPE AS NOTED. WALL MOUNTED, H.I.D. FLOODUGHT FIXTURE 'Q' SITE UGHTINC POLE WITH H.I.D. UGHTING FIXTURES A/c AC A.F.F. AWG AMP APPROX ARCH ATM AUTO AUX BOT BLDG CAB CAT CB CLG CTR CKT COAX COL C C.O. CONT CU CT DC DED DEG DET DIAM DISC DPDT DPST DN DWG (E) EA EL ELECT EMT EMER ENGR EQUIP ETC EWC EXIST EXTR EXP FOR FIXT FLEX FLR FSD FT FURN GEN GRN CND HTR HGT HID HZ COMMON ABBREVIATIONS AIR CONDITIONING ALTERNATING CURRENT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE AMPERE APPROXIMATE ARCHITECT OR ARCHITECTURAL AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE AUTOMATIC AUXILIARY BOTTOM BUILDING CABINET CATALOG CIRCUIT BREAKER CEIUNG CENTER CIRCUIT COAXIAL COLUMN CONDUIT CONDUIT ONLY CONTINUE COPPER CURRENT TRANSFORMER DIRECT CURRENT DEDICATED CIRCUIT DECREE DETAIL DIAMETER DISCONNECT SWITCH DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW SWITCH DOUBLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWITCH DOWN DRAWING EXISTING EACH ELEVATION ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING EMERGENCY ENGINEER EQUIPMENT ETCETERA ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXISTING EXTERIOR EXPLOSION PROOF FEEDER FIXTURE FLEXIBLE FLOOR FIRE SMOKE DAMPER FOOT FURNISH GENERATOR GREEN GROUND HEATER HEIGHT HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE HERTZ LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE HPS 1N HORIZ HP IG 114 INFO JB KW KWH KV LGTH LT LC MAC MAINT MCC MFG MAX LECH MIN MISC MTD MTG NEC NC NIC NO NTS No. OR 1 OC OD PNL 0 OR PH PVC PWR PF PB PR QTY RECP REF REQ'D REV RGS RM SECT SHT SIN SPIT SPST SPEC ST SW SYS TC TEL XFMR TYP UG U.O.N. VERT WP WH W HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM HIGH VOLTAGE HORIZONTAL HORSEPOWER ISOLATED GROUND INCH INFORMATION JUNCTION BOX KILOWATT KILOWATT HOUR KILOVOLT LENGTH LIGHT LONG MAGNETIC MAINTENANCE MOTOR CONTROL CENTER MANUFACTURER MAXIMUM MECHANICAL MINIMUM MISCELLANEOUS MOUNTED MOUNTING NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE NORMALLY CLOSED NOT IN CONTRACT NORMALLY OPEN NOT TO SCALE NUMBER ON CENTER OUTSIDE DIAMETER PANEL PERCENT PHASE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE POWER POWER FACTOR PUSHBUTTON PAIR QUANTITY RECEPTACLE REFERENCE REQUIRED REVISION RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL ROOM SECTION SHEET SIMILAR SINGLE POLE DOUBLE THROW SWITCH SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWITCH SPECIFICATION SHUNT TRIP SWITCH SYSTEM TERMINAL CONTROLLER TELEPHONE TRANSFORMER TYPICAL UNDERGROUND UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VERTICAL WEATHERPROOF WATER HEATER WATT TYPE SYMBOL DESCRIPTION VOLTAGE INPATU T T W S LAMP ANU URER / MANUFACTURER • CAT. NO. MOUNTING A 1'x8' INDUSTRIAL FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH 2-LAMPS, HEAVY -GAUGE STEEL REFLECTOR WITH 20% UPUGHT, BAKED WHITE ENAMEL FINISH ON REFLECTOR. 120V 160W FLUORESCENT 95W T12 HO UTHON96H0- 120 -GLR SURFACE J 1} A— ® 1'x4' INDUSTRIAL FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH 2- LAMPS, HEAVY -GAUGE STEEL REFLECTOR WITH 20X UPUGHT, BAKED WHITE ENAMEL FINISH ON REFLECTOR. 120V 62W FLU T12 34W T12 CENT LITHONIA AF -2 -40- 120 -GLR PENDANT . B ® 4FT. WET LOCATION INDUSTRIAL FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH 2- LAMPS, FIBERGLASS REINFORCED POLYESTER HOUSING, COLD - ROLLED STEEL ENCLOSED WIREWAY, BAKED WHITE ENAMEL FINISH OF PAINTED PARTS, HIGH - IMPACT ACRYUC DIFFUSER 120V 82W FLUORESCENT 34W T12 UTHONIA _240_120 -CUR SURFACE C EGEI 4FT. LOW - PROFILE FLUORESCENT WRAPAROUND FIXTURE WITH MATTE WHITE OPAL ACRYLIC LENS, BAKE WHITE ENAMEL FINISH. 120V 62W FLUORESCENT 34W T12- UTHONIA 2- ACW -40- 120 -GLR WALL D 2'X4' 3 -LAMP RECESSED FLUORESCENT FIXTURE WITH CASKETTD FLUSH STEEL DOOR INTEGRAL T -BAR SAFETY CUPS AND PRISMATIC ACRYUC LENS. 12W * 93W FLUORESCENT 34W T12 LITHONIA 2SPG-340-Al2-120- 1/3 -G1R RECESSED -- �� E 2 WALL MOUNTED COMPACT H.I.D. FLOODUGHT FIXTURE WITH IMPACT - RESISTANT TEMPERED CLASS LENS MOUNTED IN A DIE -CAST ALUMINUM DOOR FRAME, STAINLESS STEEL LATCHES, GASKETINC, THREE -PIECE REFLECTOR, DIE -CAST ALUMINUM HOUSING WITH BRONZE FINISH, PORCELAIN MOGUL SOCKET AND STEEL TRUNNION MOUNTING YOKE 120V 302W M.H. HUBBELL MHS -Y250H -468 -1 WALL OR ENGINEER APPROVED EQUAL 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A SUED FOR BIDS PER ER/8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE a THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m�arm.mres.eo ®.aa�as .01111.10. NOME IMO ocre.11o1 s. a>14.11a[ILO 11GT1LS a.s+o1 CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG Mil Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622-81.30 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT LEGEND, ABBREVIATIONS & GENERAL NOTES DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01 -5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE NO. 769E1.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 09/04/01 SCALE NONE DRAWING NO. E -1 22x34 TTTEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 ST MARGINAL IWAY SOUTH .r• fftrN '.-1 = -= ---` =-= " - - -_■■■■■■■MM • /7 // 1 I bp. \ \1\\\\\\\\\\\\�\\`� , EAST MARC AL wAy SO 3 7 4' O 4' YT • — tT 0 O 0 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN Scote : 1' -0' = • 100' NOTES E>. REMOVE LIGHTING POLES WITH ATTACHED FIXTURES. DISPOSE OF REMOVED MATERIALS. REMOVE WIRE FROM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT BETWEEN UTILITY POLE AND PANELBOARD IN PUMP HOUSE COORDINATE WITH SEATTLE CITY LIGHT. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO PUMP HOUSE AFTER SEATTLE CI1Y LIGHT DISCONNECTS EXISTING SERVICE AND UNTIL NEW ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO PUMP HOUSE IS CONNECTED AND ENERGIZED. REMOVE PANELBOARD SERVING PARKING LOT LIGHTING POLES, DISCONNECT SWITCH, RECEPTACLE AND ASSOCIATED ABOVE GRADE ELECTRICAL DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT. E>. REMOVE LIGHTING POLES WITH ATTACHED FIXTURES. DELVER POLES AND FIXTURES TO OWNER. REMOVE WIRE FROM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT. E> E> REMOVAL OF OVERHEAD UTILITY CO. ELECTRIC SERVICE. POLE MOUNTED UTILITY CO. TRANSFORMERS AND POLE IS BY OTHERS. REMOVE WIRE FROM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT BETWEEN GATE OPERATOR AND PANELBOARD IN PUMP HOUSE. REMOVE CONTROL WIRE TO KEYPAD. INDICATE CIRCUIT BREAKER AS SPARE ON PANEL SCHEDULE. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER fl10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 18000 NTI INTIONAL tknR OAR to. 1""' ".."7" G1148 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG \ 145004244555 , mil Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia St...nt AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN Br: WAS CAD FILE NO. 769EDS100.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EDS -100 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 -......I EAST MARC MARL A L WAY SOU7 I '� -- -_ --�....Rif��- =.... C� -- -------------- - - - - -- — i AM1111 B► 0 0 0 0 PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN Scale : 1' -0' = 50' -O' • 50' 25' 100' II IRRRRR: NOTES E- SEE DRAWING ES -101 FOR NEW CIRCUITING TO EXISTING LIGHTING POLES. I] REMOVE WIRE FROM UNDERGROUND CONDUIT. -I B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIOS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY soo.ree.wn011%IL D.1I1.111 WA - Amrt.w�� ""o. I CALL 48 HOURS, BEFORE YOU DIG 4800-4245 I img Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Steuart AIRPORT MANAGER Risk Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE DEMOLMON PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: FNS CAD FILE NO. 769EDS101.OWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE 9/5/01 22x34 TRLEBLOCK (1AUG01) SCALE SHOWN DRAWING NO. EDS -101 0 r-- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L MINIM - EXIST. TELEPHONE MANHOLE .;EXIST. UTILITY POLE STREET LIGHT, TYP. 4—EXIST. TELEPHONE MANHOLE TO HANGAR (2)4 -C.O. (2)4 -C.O. 3 /4'C.O. UTILITY METERING CENTER HANGAR #3 ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO HANGAR 14 HOUSE PANEL SEE DWG. EP -404 FOR yv' CONTINUATION ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO TO PUMP HOUSE ELECT. SERVICE TO (6) GAR 13 BAYS. SEE DWG. EP -403 FOR CONTINUATION GROUND ROD WITH AIRCRAFT GROUNDING RECEPTAE, TYP. ELECT. SERVICE TO (5) HANGAR 4 BAYS. S DWG. -404 FOR CONTINUATION 3/ C.O. EXIST. PANEL FURN. BY OWNER,INSTALL & CONNECTED BY CONTRACTOR 1 1 22)(34 TRLEBLOCK (1A0001) • PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Scale : 1' -0' = 50' -0' • r 100' N e a l e S E B E S NOTES E> 3'- 6'X3'- 6'X3' -2' (MIN.) PRECAST CONCRETE HANDHOLE, WITH PULLING IRONS. GALVANIZED DIAMOND PLATE COVER WITH LOCKING LATCH, RECESSED LIFT HANDLE. PROVIDE NAMEPLATE ON COVER TO READ 'ELECTRIC SERVICE TO PUMP HOUSE'. TOP OF HANDHOLE TO BE 1' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE SURROUNDING SURFACE UP TO HANDHOLE COVER. SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR DEVICE SPECIFICATION. MOUNT SWITCH ON EXTERIOR OF PUMP HOUSE AT +60' WITH RECEPTACLE BELOW. 3. SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR FEEDER SIZES. E> ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO HANGAR 13 HOUSE PANEL SEE DRAWING EP -403 FOR CONTINUATION. I s> 2' -614 X6' -01 X4' -0'D PRECAST CONCRETE HANDHOLE, WITH PULLING IRONS, GALVANIZED DIAMOND PLATE COVER WITH RECESSED LIFT HANDLE UTILITY VAULT /264 -T WITH 1264 -TA COVER. PROVIDE NAMEPLATE ON COVER TO READ 'TELEPHONE'. TOP OF HANDHOLE TO BE 1' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. SLOPE SURROUNDING SURFACE UP TO HANDHOLE COVER. © EXTEND CONDUITS UP EXISTING WOOD POLE TO 10 -FT. ABOVE GRADE AND TERMINATE WITH AN INSULATED BUSHING. INSTALL PER SEATTLE CRY LIGHT STANDARDS. • UNDERGROUND CONDUITS ARE NOT TO BE LOCATED BENEATH HANGAR #3 FOUNDATION. E> 2'C.O. TELEPHONE SERVCE TO HANGAR #3. SEE DWG. EP -403 FOR CONTINUATION. L PROVIDE TWO CONTROL LOOPS AT GATE. ONE FOR AUTOMATIC EXIT, AND ONE FOR ANTI- CLOSURE DETECTION. LOOPS TO BE EMBEDDED IN PAVEMENT PER GATE OPERATOR MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. E> PROVIDE HOFFMAN IA12R 6 CR E LOSURE, OR EQUAL, WITH CFCI TYPE RECEPTACLE AND MOTOR RATED SWITCH MOUNTED INSIDE FOR DISCONNECTING SERVICE TO GATE OPERATOR. CONNECT RECEPTACLE AHEAD OF SWITCH. MOUNT ENCLOSURE ON STRUT CHANNEL ANCHORED TO AVEMENT. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 1/22/02 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS / DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY MaMnM9r MR..N IMO. IMI6.M70M1 MD. MiR Ml. .MSR►,.A MIM.�MM CALL 4 HON 8 B$EFORE eDeIG t .20V'4 455 5 Effil Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE N0. 769ES100.DWG CHECKED BY JRB DATE: 9/6/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. ES -100 1ST MARG—INAL—.--W-AY SDUT aa mmmmmmmm II PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Scale : 1' -0' = • 50' 25' 100' . . . ■ ■ BORON NOTES E> INTERCEPT EXISTING UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AND PROVIDE JUNCTION BOX. E> 1 -C,3/8 & 118 CND. TO EXISTING PANEL Dl, CKTS. 5,7,9. PANEL IS LOCATED IN BLDG. NORTH OF TEMPORARY CONTROL TOWER. PROVIDE 20A/3P CIRCUIT BREAKER IN PANEL BREAKER TO BE OF SAME TYPE AND HAVE SAME NC RATING AS EXISTING BREAKERS IN PANEL PROVIDE CONTACTOR IN NEMA 1 ENCLOSURE IN SAME ROOM AS PANEL EXACT LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY OWNER. ROUTE CIRCUITS THRU CONTACTOR. PROVIDE PHOTOCELL ON ROOF, FACING NORTH, AND CONNECT TO CONTACTOR WITH CONTROL POWER FROM CKT. 01/11. PROVIDE 20A/1P BREAKER. PHOTOCELL SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE DEVICE IS ADJUSTED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. A REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER PER THE NON - RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1513.7. EXISTING LIGHTING POLE AND FIXTURES, TYPICAL. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS/SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY scan am f■811011 =CO 1ri6•M,10IML FILM SLIM ■■O ■LAT "`"w `"'" au. a HODS BEFORE YOU DIG 11004244565 fjm Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick R■naud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT PARTIAL ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT N0. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE P40. 769ES101.OWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. ES -101 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUG01) 0 16 214 10 10 -'10 BAY 1 5 gEl 8 jr 4. I 8 k )4 - -$— 8 \i$ _L OFFICE 8 100 `-10 1 90 1 500 10- 10 10 0 12 ti 14 ! X 12 110 BAY2 10 _12 BAY6 16� 110 _ 12 00 600 110 110 10 110 12 110 _12 BAY 7 700 110 12 1110 BAY 4 400 12 E> 110 12 HANGAR #1 LIGHTING PLAN Scole : 1/8' =1' -0' • 16 110 12 110 12 Ij II PANEL 1/8,10,12. 3/4 "C,4110 •u RE RISER 1 60 1 PANEL 1/14,16,18. 14 1/2 "C,4112 70 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' • • NOTES 1. SEE SHEET EP -401 FOR LOCATION OF PANEL 1. [T% SUSPEND FIXTURE FROM ROOF STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH BOTTOM OF FIXTURE 6" ABOVE TOP OF HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT. [T> SUSPEND FIXTURE FROM ROOF STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH BOTTOM OF FIXTURE AT +9' -0' AFF. BOTTOM OF FIXTURE TO BE AT +6' -6" AFF. [7 MOUNT TO STRUCTURAL MEMBER ABOVE HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT F-E-> ROUTE HOMERUN TO PANELBOARD VIA LIGHTING CONTACTOR MOUNTED ADJACENT PANELBOARD. CONTACTOR TO BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL. CONTACTOR SHALL BE MECH. HELD, 30A, 3- POLES, IN NEMA 1 ENCLOSURE. SQUARE D 1LXG30 -120, OR EQUAL T > MOUNT PHOTOCELL ADJACENT TO FLOODLIGHT FIXTURE WITH PHOTOCELL FACING NORTH. PHOTOCELL TO BE 120V, SPST, TORK 12101 OR EQUAL PHOTOCELL SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE DEVICE IS ADJUSTED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. A REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER PER THE NON- RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1513.7. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 1/22/02 12/11/01 MURK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY xaRae•sr Imo. IV.. eflF1.MT.VML BLVD. •.111 Ie. CHILL 48 HO(J S AFORE YOU DIG 1'800424 5555 Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rink Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 LIGHTING PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE NO. 769EL401.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EL -401 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) 0 13 8 90 TYP. E> O 700 0 10 600 r1 0 10 12 1 —12 i 1 I I I 6. 110 1 500 12 TYP 15 11 PANEL 12/13,15,17. 1/2'C,4112 EE HANGAR #2 LIGHTING PLAN Scale : 1/8' =1. -0` 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET EP -402 FOR LOCATION OF PANEL 2. • SUSPEND FIXTURE FROM ROOF STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH BOTTOM OF FIXTURE 6' ABOVE TOP OF HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT. Fr> BOTTOM OF FIXTURE TO BE AT +6' -6' AFF. ▪ MOUNT TO STRUCTURAL MEMBER ABOVE HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT r5> ROUTE HOMERUN TO PANELBOARD VIA LIGHTING CONTACTOR MOUNTED ADJACENT PANELBOARD. CONTACTOR TO BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL CONTACTOR SHALL BE MECH. HELD, 30A. 3- POLES, IN NEMA 1 ENCLOSURE. SQUARE D 1LX630 -120, OR EQUAL 6 > MOUNT PHOTOCELL ADJACENT TO FLOODUGHT FIXTURE WITH PHOTOCELL FACING NORTH. PHOTOCELL TO BE 120V, SPST, TORK 12101 OR EQUAL PHOTOCELL SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE DEVICE IS ADJUSTED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. A REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER PER THE NON- RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1513.7. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 1/22/02 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY NORTWO t MOON MOO 0n.0M1 om. tVO. KWE so. 131M Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Woshington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 LIGHTING PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY HAS CAD FILE NO. 769E1.402.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EL -402 0 22x34 TRLEBLOCK (1A0001) O 110 II 11 bANEL 3H/1,3,5. /2'C.3110 & 1112 II 1a II II I II II 1I 11 11 II L TYP. OFFICE 3c TYP. -E 3d r 3b J BAY, 6 I 600 I r-1 1 1 1 I I L 111 4 1 14TYP _•a e 161 PANEL 3 -1/1,3 1/2'C,3j12 PANEL 3- 2/2,4. 1/2'C,3j12 M 5111 110 4f OFFICE 50 4g Hfl I I I I LJ 2h BAYS 1 500 1 r I I LU 11 OFFICE 411j- 2x 31 400 I I I I I 1 I I I I I L 3s OFFICE BAYS z 00 o q D T�_ L J .86Y.1.2 r - PANEL 3- 41,3. 1/2'C,3j12 PANE 3- 6/2,4. 1/2'C,3j12 v ti '4 PANEL 3 -3/1,3 !I 1/2'C,3j12 PANEL 3- 4/2,4.:.. 1/2'C,3112 4 It< Iz TYP. 110 • HANGAR #3 LIGHTING PLAN scole : 1/8' =1' -0' r—I 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' ■•• • NOTES 1. SEE SHEET EP -403 FOR LOCATION OF PANELBOARDS. SUSPEND FIXTURE FROM ROOF STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH BOTTOM OF FIXTURE 6- ABOVE TOP OF HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT. 1-.F> MOUNT FIXTURE TO STRUT CHANNEL ANCHORED TO BOTTOM OF CANOPY STRUCTURAL STEEL + BOTTOM OF FIXTURE TO BE AT +6' -6' AFF. • MOUNT TO STRUCTURAL MEMBER ABOVE HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT © ROUTE HOMERUN TO PANELBOARD VIA LIGHTING CONTACTOR MOUNTED ADJACENT PANELBOARD. CONTACTOR TO BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL CONTACTOR SHALL BE MECH. HELD, 30A, 3- POLES, IN NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE. SQUARE D 1LXG30 -120, OR EQUAL. / MOUNT PHOTOCELL ADJACENT TO FLOODLIGHT FIXTURE WITH PHOTOCELL FACING NORTH. PHOTOCELL TO BE 120V, SPST, TORK 12101 OR EQUAL PHOTOCELL SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE DEVICE IS ADJUSTED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. A REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER PER THE NON- RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1513.7. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN .COMPANY NOnINMMIT 1110011 WOO INTEIONTIONAL MUM •JTE 1lA' Ml►..M " rte. ' CALL 48 HOUI ' BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 1.800.424.5555 I ing Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Steered AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 LIGHTING PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE N0. 769EL403.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING ND. EL -403 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1A0001) - to TYP.� PANEL 4- 1/1,3. 1/21:,3112 BAY 1 100 PANEL 4H/1,3 1/2 "C,3112 2e f - OFFICE I I 20 PANEL 4- 2/2.4. 1/2.C,3112 a -1 f 21 -1 I I I I i I L — J BAY 2 200 f h � I PANEL 4- 3/1.3. 1/2'C,3112 r -� I I I I I I I I L _ J BAY3 300 OFFlOCE L r 3j 3k 1 0 P. ZVP 1 n -(�- - PANEL 4- 4/2,4. 1/2C,3I12 n � o OFFICE 40 4p s Q t PANEL 4- 5/1,3. 1/2'C,3112 • 3t OFFICE 3t 400 500 • HANGAR #4 LIGHTING PLAN Scale : 1/8' =1' -0' 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' NOTES 1. SEE SHEET EP -404 FOR LOCATION OF PANELBOARDS. (-z-> SUSPEND FIXTURE FROM ROOF STRUCTURAL STEEL WITH BOTTOM OF FIXTURE 6" ABOVE TOP OF HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT. • MOUNT FIXTURE TO STRUT CHANNEL ANCHORED TO BOTTOM OF CANOPY STRUCTURAL STEEL BOTTOM OF FIXTURE TO BE AT +6' -6' AFF. MOUNT TO STRUCTURAL MEMBER ABOVE HANGAR DOOR HEIGHT © ROUTE HOMERUN TO PANELBOARD VIA LIGHTING CONTACTOR MOUNTED ADJACENT PANELBOARD. CONTACTOR TO BE CONTROLLED BY PHOTOCELL. CONTACTOR SHALL BE MECH. HELD, 30A. 3- POLES, IN NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE. SQUARE D ILXG30 -120, OR EQUAL F7 MOUNT PHOTOCELL ADJACENT TO FL00DUGHT FIXTURE WITH PHOTOCELL FACING NORTH. PHOTOCELL TO BE 120V, SPST, TORK 12101 OR EQUAL PHOTOCELL SHALL BE TESTED TO ENSURE DEVICE IS ADJUSTED AND OPERATING PROPERLY. A REPORT OF TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE OWNER PER THE NON- RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 1513.7. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY .o.nwIar tenor 10110.n6.1117131116. ttua WTI SOD wan"."`"* GALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1100424-5555 I Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seottle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyntni. St...n AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 LIGHTING PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE NO. 769EL404.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EL-404 22x34 TITL.EBLOCK (1A0001) • O 600 700 60 FOR BASEBOARD HEATER PANEL 1/29 ELEC. RM, GROUND BUS #10s PANEL 1 HANGAR #1 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN Scale : 1/8' =1' -O' • 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' • • • • NOTES E> 48 X48'X3/a' FIRE RESISTANT PLYWOOD BACKBOARD FOR TELEPHONE. MOUNT WITH BOTTOM OF PLYWOOD 24' AFF. PROVIDE A 16 AWC GROUND WIRE FROM GROUND BUS TO TELEPHONE BACKBOARD. E SEE DRAWING ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION. CONNECT TO UCHT FIXTURE, SEE DWG. EL -401. ( • > CONNECT TO WATER HEATER LOCATED ABOVE TOILET ROOM CEILING. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2-WIRE. ▪ PANEL 1/2,4,6,20. 3/4'C,4110 & 2112. [Ti PANEL 1/19,21,23,25,27. 1'C.3110 & 4112. • CONNECT TO SPRINKLER SYSTEM AIR COMPRESSOR. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. PROVIDE RELAY WITH 206V COIL IN CIRCUIT TO COMPRESSOR TO SEND TROUBLE SIGNAL TO FIRE ALARM PANEL IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF POWER. © PANEL 1/22,26. 1/2'C,3112. 9. HOME RUNS TO BE ROUTED AT FRONT 5 -FT. OF HANGARS SO THAT JUNCTION BOXES ARE ACCESSIBLE WITH AIRPLANES IN THE HANGARS. 10. SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR FEEDER SIZES. 11. CONTRACTOR TO BOND INCOMING WATER AND GAS SERVICES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NEC ARTICLE 250. SEE CML DRAWINGS FOR INCOMING UTIUTIES. E> 2'C.O. TO TELEPHONE BACKBOARD. TERMINATE CONDUIT IN A PLASTIC BUSHING. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER #10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ERI8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY cmxon...EVOMM..eMEMs..a.,■e:m. 1110111111•191 1•1110111 11•00 ILVD. CALL 48 HDLle BEFORE YOU DIG „ 1042405555 I Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cyntk, SI..an AIRPORT MANAGER Rlek Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #1 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE NO. 769EP401.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE 9/5/01 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUC01) SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EP-401 1> ,12 PANEL 2/16,18,20,2 3/4 "C.5110 6 18 110 110 v 1 2' 20 I 110 20 W.P. 4,6- SUPPORT-) 90 X19 ty 80 B00 v 110 110 v m BAY 7 L 700 110 I I I I I I m BAY6 an f 9 110 7 m 500 110 4 O O z 0 =o I I I I 110 I I I I 23 BAYF 400 m 110 m 23 11 110 °° 110 25 � b� 'Ws i7 Nn- RD 4110 300 r-1 I I I I I I I I I m 110 200 an 1104 2 wrog 12 PANEL G m m 110 PANEL 2/24,26 1/2tC,3112 7' PANEL 2/1 9.2 1,23.25.27. 1- C,7110 Lrt, HANGAR #2 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN Scole : 1/8' =1' -0" ku 100 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 26 \ a 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' • • .. NOTES 48(48'X3/4" FIRE RESISTANT PLYWOOD BACKBOARD FOR TELEPHONE. MOUNT WITH BOTTOM OF PLYWOOD 24' AFF. PROVIDE A 16 AWG GROUND WIRE FROM THE GROUND BUS TO THE TELEPHONE BACKBOARD. 1_' SEE DRAWING ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION. 3. SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR FEEDER SIZES. 4 > CONNECT TO WATER HEATER LOCATED ABOVE TOILET ROOM CEILING. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V. 2 -WIRE. CONNECT TO LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE DWG. EL -402. PANEL 2/2.4,6. 1/2'C,4112. PANEL 2/16,18,20,22. 1/2'C,5112. CONNECT TO SPRINKLER SYSTEM AIR COMPRESSOR. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. PROVIDE RELAY WITH 208V COIL IN CIRCUIT TO COMPRESSOR TO SEND TROUBLE SIGNAL TO FIRE ALARM PANEL IN THE 9. HOME RUNS TO BE ROUTED AT FRONT 5 -FT. OF HANGARS SO THAT JUNCTION BOXES ARE ACCESSIBLE WITH AIRPLANES IN THE HANGARS. 10. CONTRACTOR TO BOND INCOMING WATER AND GAS SERVICES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NEC ARTICLE 250. SEE CML DRAWINGS FOR INCOMING UTIUTIES. It PANEL 2/2,4.6. 1'C.218 & 2110. ril> PANEL 2/1,3,5,7,9. 1 "C,7910. 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER/8 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS 1/22/02 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY 10I1THR1r Imo. Ipp..namano11AL END. SUITE XIS 'MAMA 12A. 011042011 w au a HOURS 1 BEFORE YOU DIG 1.80044245555 MilConsulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Seattle. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED CynthIa Steyr cri AIRPORT MANAGER Rlek Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #2 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: HIS CAD FILE NO. 769EP402.0WG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 09/04/01 SCALE: NONE DRAWING NO. EP-402 2204 TIT EBLOCK (1A0001) wag r) W-P ® 2•1 , � 7 I I I l --id I r—i N.PJ T r FOR IRRIGATION CONTROLLER LAv I1j 91;1a001,_ I�t i� I; l;I 11 I� -0c9 91 oFFICE "_ '3 60 I 4 OFFICE 2 FIRE ALARM BOOSTER PANEL METERING CENTER. W.P. PANEL 3H/2,4,6,8,10. 3/4 "C,7/12. SEE DWG. ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION 1. 7 GROUND BUS PANEL 3H BAY 6 600 I I I I I I I I I I (6) CONDUITS TO PANELS IN HANGAR /3, SEE DRAWING ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION PANEL 3 -6 PANEL 3- 6/7,9,11. 1/2 "C,4/12 PANEL 3- 6/2,4,6. 1/2'C,4912 — 3 /4 "C.O. PANEL 3 -5 PANEL 3- 5/8,10,12. 1/2 "C,4112 PANEL 3- 5/1,3,5. 1/2 "C,4 /12 m 10 3 /4 "C.O. BAY 5 soo _-1 i I i L LAV V 41 Y Vp drAk •' sT i �~ 6 1I X012,_ —., 1 1 /4 "C.O. - • m BAY 4 400 OFFICE 40 PANEL 3 -4 PANEL 3- 4/7,9,11. I 1/2 "C,4/12 PANEL 3- 4/2,4,6. t/2 "C,4/12 3/4'C.O. 1 "C.O. 6 0 0 z 0 11 V 0 I W m / JZ / = 10 10 r Am Ellij lir In t_ 137 ©ti • ti ` •I i1 ELIZA 1_1.11Y 111 EMI . • OFFIC 11 0 5 6 10 PANEL 3 -3 PANEL 3- 3/8,10,12. 1/2"C,4112 m PANEL 3- 3/1,3,5. 1/2 "C,4112 m 3 /4 "C.O. D I I I LJ 8 1 300 1 1"c.0. m 17 71 I 1 I I ED L-t 5 N' I m 1 o GE 121 X12 10 (>0-4.-1 10 LJ .59L2 200 PANEL 3 -2 PANEL 3- 2/7.9.11. 1/2- C,4112 PANEL 3- 2/2.4,6. 1/2 "C,4I12 —. 3/4 "C.O. /-3/4-C.O. JI U-1) PANEL L- HANGAR #3 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN Scale : 1/8' =1' -0' PANEL 3 -1 PANEL 3- 1/8,10,1 . 1/2%,4#12 PANEL 3- 1/1.3,5. 1/2 "C,4112 3 /4 "C.O. 1 100 I I I I I 1 I I I LJ v 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' ■••• 3. 7. NOTES 18'X18'X6" WEATHERPROOF PULLBOX. MOUNT AT HEIGHT FOR CONDUITS INSIDE HANGAR TO BE ROUTED AT BOTTOM CHORD OF ROOF TRUSS. PROVIDE A /6 AWG GROUND WIRE FROM THE GROUND BUS TO THE TELEPHONE CABINET. CONNECT TO WATER HEATER LOCATED ABOVE TOILET ROOM CEILING. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. TYPICAL SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR FEEDER SIZES. CONNECT TO SPRINKLER SYSTEM AIR COMPRESSOR. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. PROVIDE RELAY WITH 20BV COIL IN CIRCUIT TO COMPRESSOR TO SEND TROUBLE SIGNAL TO FIRE ALARM PANEL IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF POWER. CONNECT TO LIGHT FIXTURE, SEE DRAWING EL -403. TYPICAL MOUNT TRANSFORMER ON CEILING OF TOILET ROOM. TYPICAL HOME RUNS TO BE ROUTED AT FRONT 5 -F1. OF HANGARS SO THAT JUNCTION BOXES ARE ACCESSIBLE WITH AIRPLANES IN THE HANGARS. 8. CONTRACTOR TO BOND INCOMING WATER AND GAS SERVICES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NEC ARTICLE 250. SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR INCOMING UTILITIES. • 1 1/2 C.O. TO TELEPHONE CABINET. to • 3/4" C., SEE SHEET ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION. tt 3/4" C., SEE SHEET EP -404 FOR CONTINUATION. E> TELEPHONE TERMINAL CABINET WITH INTERNAL PLYWOOD BACKBOARD TO BE PER TELEPHONE UTILITY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. CABINET IS 57 "H X 25"W X 7'D. B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER /10 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER /8 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY ai.laflim•.®. -. •o- ®u•mm.cly. NOMIWIesrImo. IMO INTISINATIONAL NAM. KM NZ fARI. /airdfi� Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue. Suite 900 Scottie. Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fox (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER Rick Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #3 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT NO. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN 8Y: HAS CAD FILE NO. 769EP403.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING NO. EP -403 22x34 TTILEBLOCK (1AUG01) • 0 PANEL 4- 2/7,9. 1/2'C 2112 PANEL 4H/2,4. 4 1/2'C,2110 Iyi + 7— fI - i- m . ea 1112 t. 1/, PANEL 4 -1 -PANEL 4- 1/7,9,11. 1/2'C.4112 FA PANEL 4H/8. 1/2'C,2112 W.P.,GFCI W.P.1 1 Ii ~II L SEE DRAWING ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION 0 .-.,re re g ■ W.P -GROUND BUS PANEL 4H (5) CONDUITS TO PANELS IN HANGAR 14, SEE DRAWING ES -100 FOR CONTINUATION Mk TIEF W 10 20 1 PANEL 4- 2/1>13,5. 1/2'C,4112 1 PANEL 4- 3/2,4.6. 1/2'C,4112 '1W5 3r6;' 4717;7‘; a�!l _l � I 91 Alk II PANEL 4 4/ 9 FFl 1/2 .2 30 0 4. --1 L - J BAY 1 100 9 PANEL 4- 1/8,10. 1/2'C,2112 PANEL 4 -2 3 /4•C.O. 10 att 3/4'C.O. 1 1/4'C.O. 200 I PANEL 4- 2/8.10.12. 1/2'C,4112 4 .4/7,9. /20,2112 OFFICE 1401 ALL1 Oft ei 10® J 1 NEW PANEL 4 -4/ 3,5. 1/2'C 4112 PANEL 4- 5/2,4.6. 1/2'C,4112 , •-' ", 6:, P] IAV — m� i■ g+,- D PANEL 4 -4 PANEL 4- 4/8,10,12. 1/2'C,4112 51 II 8 9 50 PANEL 4 -5 PANEL 4- 5/7,9,11. 1/2'0,4/12 9 PANEL 4- 5/8,10. 1/2'0,2112 r- 400 500 m 3/4'C.0. U PANEL 4 -3 PANEL 4- 3/7,9,11. 1/2'C,4112 300 D 1'C.O. 9 PANEL 4- 3/8,10. 1/2'C,2112 3/4'C.O. f HANGAR #4 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN Scale : 1/8 " =1' -0` • 0 z u, U J 0 0 3 4' 2' 0 4' 8' 12' 16' 20' • • • • NOTES 18'X18"(6' WEATHERPROOF PULLBOX. MOUNT AT HEIGHT FOR CONDUITS INSIDE HANGAR TO BE ROUTED AT BOTTOM CHORD OF ROOF TRUSS. PROVIDE A 16 AWG GROUND WIRE FROM GROUND BUS TO TELEPHONE CABINET. CONNECT TO WATER HEATER LOCATED ABOVE TOILET ROOM CEIUNG. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. TYPICAL SEE DRAWING E -601 FOR FEEDER SIZES. CONNECT TO SPRINKLER SYSTEM AIR COMPRESSOR. DISCONNECT SWITCH TO BE RATED 30A, 240V, 2 -WIRE. PROVIDE RELAY WITH 208V COIL IN CIRCUIT TO COMPRESSOR TO SEND TROUBLE SIGNAL TO FIRE ALARM PANEL IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF POWER. CONNECT TO LIGHT FIXTURE. SEE DRAWING EL -404. TYPICAL MOUNT TRANSFORMER ON CEILING OF TOILET ROOM. TYPICAL HOME RUNS TO BE ROUTED AT FRONT 5 -F7. OF HANGARS SO THAT JUNCTION BOXES ARE ACCESSIBLE WITH AIRPLANES IN THE HANGARS. CONTRACTOR TO BOND INCOMING WATER AND GAS SERVICES AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF NEC ARTICLE 250. SEE CML DRAWINGS FOR INCOMING UTIUTIES. 1 1/4' C.O. TO TELEPHONE CABINET. 3/4' C., SEE SHEET EP -403 FOR CONTINUATION. TELEPHONE TERMINAL CABINET WITH INTERNAL PLYWOOD BACKBOARD TO BE PER TELEPHONE UTIUTY COMPANY REQUIREMENTS. CABINET IS 57'H X 25'W X 7'D. 8 ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 12/11/01 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY eeru•ne•ea.aa.ee®s•mRn.cme roRnwuT S wTe IMO ornsi r.L WAX curt ea. MTh; ISIN1411:4 mowilawallasm EN TI Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Scottie, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stowed AIRPORT MANAGER Rkk Renaud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT HANGAR #4 POWER AND AUXILIARY SYSTEMS PLAN DESIGNED BY: Is PROJECT N0. 01- 576901 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD flLE N0. 769EP404.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 9/5/01 SCALE: SHOWN DRAWING N0. EP -404 22x34 TTREBLOCK (1AUG01) n MULTI - METERING CENTER r- L DOUBLE THROW, NON— FUSIBLE SAFETY SWITCH, NEMA 3R (FOR MANUAL TRANSFER TO PORTABLE GENERATOR) APPLETON 1AJA40134400 PIN & SLEEVE RECEPTACLE WITH MOUNTING BOX 3- C- 31500kcmil & 112GRND SEATTLE CITY LIGHT UTILITY SERVICE 600A BUS, 480Y/277V, 30, 4W METER, TYP. S 400A EXISTING 400A 480V 3 —PH., 3W EXISTING PUMP HOUSE V 100 AMP, 3POLE DISC. SWITCH 570A 100 AMP, 3POLE DISC. SWITCH 480V, 3 PH. 45 KVA 208Y/120V.. 3PH,4W 2 -C -4/1/0 & 116 GND. ONE PANEL TO SERVE AU. UNITS IN HANGAR 11. NO INDMDUAL BAY METERING. 1 60 AMP. 3POLE DISC. SW (TYP.) 480V, 3 PH. 45 KVA 208Y/120V, 3PH,4W 2 -C -411/0 & 116 GND. ONE PANEL TO SERVE ALL UNITS IN HANGAR 12. NO INDMDUAL BAY METERING. U O co 12, 550A 30 AMP. 3POLE DISC. SWITCH 480V, 3 PH. 30 INA 208Y/120V, 3PH,4W (1YP.) 1 1 /2 -C -412 & 118 GND. (•) TYPICAL OF 6. (1 FOR EACH HANGAR 13 BAY SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM Score : NONE • 3 60 AMP, 3POLE DISC. SW (TYP.) 480V, 3 PH. 15 KVA 208Y/120V, 3PH,4W `1 -C -418 & 118 GND. HANGAR 13 HOUSE PANEL 50A V O CO a V 30 AMP, 3POLE DISC. SWITCH 480V, 3 PH. 30 KVA 208Y/120V, 3PH,4W 1/2 C -412 & 118 GND. (•) TYPICAL OF 5. (1) FOR EACH HANGAR 14 BAY O 3/4C -3 #10 & 1 - #10 GNO. 530A 480V, 3 PH. 15 KVA 208Y/120V. 3PH,4W 1 -C -418 & 118 GND. HANGAR 14 HOUSE PANEL B ISSUED FOR PERMIT PER ER 110 1/22/02 A ISSUED FOR BIDS PER ER18 MARK REVISIONS /SUBMISSIONS / 12/11/01 DATE THE AUSTIN . COMPANY m.ua.ns•O®a•o•®u • mn.cim rOwtl.rrat Imor 1102I11111911M111111AL w0. SUM WO .tJRtl; M.. "" CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG ♦ 11004244555 , Consulting Engineers 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, Washington 98101 (206) 622 -5822 Fax (206) 622 -8130 APPROVED Cynthia Stewart AIRPORT MANAGER RIek R.nnud AIRPORT ENGINEER KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT BOEING FIELD SEATTLE. WASHINGTON LOT 14 REDEVELOPMENT SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM DESIGNED BY: HAS PROJECT N0. 01- 5769D1 DRAWN BY: HAS CAD FILE N0. 769E601.DWG CHECKED BY: JRB DATE: 09/05/01 SCALE: NONE DRAWING N0. E -601 22x34 TITLEBLOCK (1AUGO1)