Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
SEPA E02-007 - LAWTON JULIE / THE SENECA GROUP - 349,000 SF EXPANSION OF MUSUEM OF FLIGHT
E02 -007 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT 9404 E MARGINAL wys • City of Micwg Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF DECISION DATED MARCH 18, 2002 TO: Julie Lawton, the Seneca Group King County Assessor, Accounting Division State Department of Ecology, SEPA Division This letter serves as a notice of decision that the application for planned action regarding the expansion of the Museum of Flight in three to four phases is issued pursuant to TMC 21.04.156. PROJECT BACKGROUND FILE NUMBER: E02 -007 APPLICANT: The Seneca Group for the Museum of Flight REQUEST: Determine that the proposed construction, demolition and relocation fall under the Manufacturing/Industrial Center -Heavy (MIC/H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. Location: 9404 East Marginal Way South, (tax account numbers: 332404 -9019; 562420 -1032 and 542260 -0124) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project is a 349,000 square foot expansion of the existing Museum of Flight adjacent to the King County International Airport. The project proposed under this Planned Action SEPA will be carried out in three or four phases. Phase Al is a new stand alone building expanding the Museum; Phase A2 will join the new building with the existing museum and enclose the Red Barn, the first of the Boeing manufacturing buildings. Phase B is an addition on the east side of the buildings constructed in Phases Al and A2. The final phase (C) is a new building on the west side of East Marginal Way South. In Phase C a two -story, 35,000 square foot office /warehouse will be demolished. In order to expand on the north side of the Museum, one light aircraft hangar must be moved. An earlier Planned Action SEPA (E02 -002) addressed the removal of two hangars on the north side of the Museum of Flight, and moving of one to a parcel north of the existing hangar site. A transfer of properties among the Boeing Company, the Museum of Flight and the King County International Airport is taking place in order to facilitate the Museum's expansion. The applicant provided a traffic impact assessment, geotechnical study, hazardous materials survey and a Phase 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 0 Tukwila, Washington 98188 0 Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 0 Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Notice of Decision' • • E02 -007: Museum of Flight Expansion March 18, 2002 I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessment for review as part of the Planned Action SEPA application. DETERMINATION: The project falls under the planned action guidelines. The decision is final with no administrative appeal. ZONING /COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MIC/H Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington, Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. the project planner is Carol Lumb who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. Steve Lancaster, Director of Community Development Date c: \mydocs\Museum of Flight Expansion\Notice of Decision.doc 2 • Cizy of Tukwila • Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 15, 2002 To: Steve Lancaster, Director r N" Fm: Carol Lumb, Associate Tanner Re: Project File No. E02 -007: Museum of Flight Expansion MEMORANDUM Project Description: The project is a 349,000 square foot expansion of the existing Museum of Flight adjacent to the King County International Airport. The applicant provided a Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment, traffic impact assessment, geotechnical study, and hazardous materials survey for review as part of the application. The project proposed under this Planned Action SEPA will be carried out in three or four phases. Phase Al is a new stand alone building expanding the Museum; Phase A2 will join the new building with the existing museum and enclose the Red Barn, the first of the Boeing manufacturing buildings. Phase B is an addition on the east side of the buildings constructed in Phases Al and A2. The final phase (C) is a new building on the west side of East Marginal Way South. In Phase C a two -story, 35,000 square foot office /warehouse will be demolished. In order to expand on the north side of the Museum, one light aircraft hangar must be moved. An earlier Planned Action SEPA (E02 -002) addressed the removal of two hangars on the north side of the Museum of Flight, and moving of one to a parcel north of the existing hangar site. A transfer of properties among the Boeing Company, the Museum of Flight and the King County International Airport is taking place in order to facilitate the Museum's expansion. The site is within the project area for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The Integrated Plan and Final EIS were completed in March, 1998. Both the Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS and the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement analyze the environmental impacts of a range of development and redevelopment alternatives on the Boeing properties along the Duwamish River corridor. This proposed project falls within the parameters of the alternatives considered by the Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Proponent: The Seneca Group for the Museum of Flight.. c: \mydocs\Museum of Flight Expansion\MOF- SEPA - staffrpt.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 SEPA Planned Action Review — E02 -007 Museum of Flight Expansion March 15, 2002 Location: • 9404 East Marginal Way South (tax account numbers 332404 -9019, 562420 -1032 and 542260- 0124) Agencies with Jurisdiction: King County Through an Interlocal Agreement, signed December 11, 2001 by the City (AG01 -132) and King County on December 13, 2001, the County has agreed to have the City of Tukwila serve as the SEPA agency and the permitting authority for any local permits required. Recommendation Determine that the proposed expansion of the Museum of Flight in four phases, demolition of a two -story office /warehouse building on the west side of East Marginal Way South and associated parking fall under the Manufacturing/Industrial Center — Heavy (MIC/H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. 2 c: \mydocs\Museum of Flight Expansion \SEPA - rpt.doc Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Phone: (206) 431 -3670 Fax: (206) 431 -3665 To: Fax: VIle 1 Mkt From: Date: Phone: Re: 0 Urgent Pages: 3 - ./.t_v2, 5- 't )b 4 '4. --1 ST141 4eifiL 0 For Review Please Comment 0 Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle •Comments: • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director March 15, 2002 To: Steve Lancaster, Director Fm: Carol Lumb, Associ MEMORANDUM lanner Re: Project File No.,E02 -007: King County International Airport Expansion Project Description: The project is a 349,000 square foot expansion of the existing Museum of Flight adjacent to the King County International Airport. The applicant provided a Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment, traffic impact assessment, geotechnical study, and hazardous materials survey for review as part of the application. The project proposed under this Planned Action SEPA will be carried out in three or four phases. Phase Al is a new stand alone building expanding the Museum; Phase A2 will join the new building with the existing museum and enclose the Red Barn, the first of the Boeing manufacturing buildings. Phase B is an addition on the east side of the buildings constructed in Phases Al and A2. The final phase (C) is a new building on the west side of East Marginal Way South. In Phase C a two -story, 35,000 square foot office /warehouse will be demolished. In order to expand on the north side of the Museum, one light aircraft hangar must be moved. An earlier Planned Action SEPA (E02 -002) addressed the removal of two hangars on the north side of the Museum of Flight, and moving of one to a parcel north of the existing hangar site. A transfer of properties among the Boeing Company, the Museum of Flight and the King County International Airport is taking place in order to facilitate the Museum's expansion. The site is within the project area for the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. The Integrated Plan and Final EIS were completed in March, 1998. Both the Duwamish Corridor Redevelopment EIS and the Tukwila Manufacturing/Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement analyze the environmental impacts of a range of development and redevelopment alternatives on the Boeing properties along the Duwamish River corridor. This proposed project falls within the parameters of the alternatives considered by the Manufacturing /Industrial Center Integrated GMA Implementation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Proponent: The Seneca Group for the Museum of Flight. c: \mydocs\Museum of Flight Expansion\MOF- SEPA - staffrpt.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 SEPA Planned Action Revic' w — E02 -007 Museum of Flight Expansion March 15, 2002 Location: • 9404 East Marginal Way South (tax account numbers 332404 -9019, 562420 -1032 and 542260- 0124) Agencies with Jurisdiction: King County Through an Interlocal Agreement, signed December 11, 2001 by the City (AG01 -132) and King County on December 13, 2001, the County has agreed to have the City of Tukwila serve as the SEPA agency and the permitting authority for any local permits required. Recommendation Determine that the proposed expansion of the Museum of Flight in four phases, demolition of a two -story office /warehouse building on the west side of East Marginal Way South and associated parking fall under the Manufacturing/Industrial Center — Heavy (MIC/H) planned action criteria and therefore no additional SEPA review is required. 2 c: \mydocs\Museum of Flight Expansion \SEPA - rpt.doc •... TRANSMISSION RESULT REPORT (MAR 21 '02 05 :16PM) TUK DCD /PW THE FOLLOWING FILE(S) ERASED FILE . FILE TYPE OPTION. 066 MEMORY TX (AUTO), TEL NO. • PAGE RESULT 9 *- 6287105. 05/05 OK ERRORS 1) HANG UP OR LINE .FAIL 2) BUSY 3) NO ANSWER 4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION Capartment of Comrnunity Cevelcpmert 6300 Soutnoanter Stud, Suite .l00 Tukwila, WA 98186 . Rhyne: (206) 431.3670 Fax: (206) 431 -36885 � To:V die From: p G-t .l Fax: Ce?- 9 1 ro Phone: Data: Pages: Re: ❑ Urgent At . W 4 ._',J ❑ For Review &Please Comment ❑ Please Reply 0 Please Recycle • • City of Tukwila Department of Community Development File Number E 0 a -001 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM No tsw�'1NA- TO: (Building ❑ Planning (Public Works ❑ Police ❑ Parks/Rec Project Name: RUSe.t/K 01- Glv3CAv M"toxr Address: 61140'i cy M W I Date Transmitted: 3 - (- 02 Response Due by: 3-16 '0 2— Staff Coordinator: Cab . L Date Response Received: Instructions The attached environmental checklist was received for this project. Please review and provide the following information: a) Potential environmental impacts, b) how each should be mitigated (i.e. SEPA condition, ordinance requirement, permit requirement etc.), c) recommended specific language as to how the mitigation measure should read, d) the policy basis for the recommended mitigation (i.e. adopted policy), e) the nexus between the recommended mitigation and the impact, and f) corrections to the checklist and supporting documentation. THIS INFORMATION IS IMPORTANT IN PROVIDING TIMELY AND ACCURATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC. Attach additional sheets if necessary. If you find the submittal incomplete and would like to request additional information, please inform the staff planner within five working days! Comments Prepared by: Date: March 4, 2002 • City of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION Ms. Julie Lawton The Seneca Group 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2350 Seattle, WA 98101 RE: Museum of Flight Expansion, SEPA Planned Action, E02 -007 Dear Ms. Lawton: Your application for a SEPA Planned Action for the Museum of Flight Expansion located at 9404 East Marginal Way South has been found to be complete on March 4, 2002 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. This determination of complete application does not preclude the City from requesting additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain any other necessary permits issued by other agencies. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 431 -3661. Sincerely,. Carol Lumb Associate Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c: \mydocs \Museum of Flight Expansion \MOF- Complete.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 -431 -3665 1-II'IfV J. . GVVG au• vc. nb I ECEIV ED• MAR 11 2002 VLE T OATS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3/12/02 •TRANSMITTAL TO Carol Lurnb COMPANY City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila WA 98188-2544 FROM Jeanne Iannucci PHONE 206 -223 -5081 FAX 206 - 223 -5018 EMAIL jiannucci®nbbj.com PROJECT NUMBER 24944.00 PROJECT NAME Museum of Flight Expansion ITEMS TRANSMITTED Q ENCLOSED 0 UNDER SEPARATE COVER ACTION TO OE TAKEN 0 PER YOUR REQUEST 0 FOR YOUR INFORMATION AND RECORD 0 FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENTS FOR YOUR APPROVAL 0 FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION ❑ OTHER SENT VIA 0 FEDERAL EXPRESS 0UPS 0 AIRBORNE EXPRESS 0 US MAIL MESSENGER REMARKS' 4 sets full size design development landscape drawings dated, September 14, 2001: 0 COPY TO Julie Lawton at The Seneca Group 111 SOUTH JACKSON STREET SEATTLE WA 08104 Sheets L100, L101 and L102 As requested for your use in review of the Museum of Flight;' Expansion Planned Action submittal. • REPROGRAPHICS °MINA rOilc ORDER FORM - - _ P.O. No. Jos No. Wei NORTHWEST INC • WBE C_ertified • 616 Bib Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 Tel: 206-624-2040 Fax: 206-382-4397 Dispatch: 206-682-4040 13039 Northup Way Ste 3 Bellevue. WA 98005 Tel: 425462- I 880 Fax: 425-497-8406 Disp . 25-682-1980 PROJECT TITLE: Xteimbursable Nin%fignagei NO. 379494 Date: 3 6120 Date Due: _45314442)___ Time Due: Z:00 eidos„, 1131 NBBJ 83 S • SEATTLE, 206-515-4E60 • Ordered By:- Phone No: 1: INS WA 98104 • . Prints To- _ ___ ._..._ . - ---- ---- • - - - - - ----- - - - ---• ------ - - - (.4.) .... _ / . Attn:. _ . , . _ ____. OrigInals go: . _ _ .., laglat .. cg-c..G18.1k0 . . 044.4. 0 t. . .. ------• , Attn: • __-.. .... ;.... .. ,, ---- ----- -kwilAties.:::,....-0;, - - I ....,,te--"Je ,,.1r V ...- ...t. t ,....? .. .1-1 I,-3,-L,..-4,.;. ..--- s , .,.. „ .._ •-•__ • . - r- ....,.: ...!: •*reSi. ' ..."*.'sf 41ZA's.....' -''. ''''' ... ' " N ...i-' - . • : k4 kg: 1:--1-'54. (a °Mt i / tn—VPIL6 LIFFr 0 , , L. 1 0 / • _ . . . . . . • ... . . . . . 13111111k : ; C1-PEE - -•:- -1i0-E.-lit 0 --.' .' -- nC:1-4i-CiA. ' "." 12 - - •• • - ,...., -.. .. i1OQS - " . .. _ : ..... . , Special Instructions. - - - - - - - . ... - - . _ Night-Phone: • cii.i,•44 26 b ".:. , • ,.- .: . . •-.._ .....^hi. . .. . _....... .._. . .... ....... . . .... . - — • - • • - - - - - - - - • • - --- - - - • -- • • - -- - -- - - - - - - • • - - - - - - - - - - - .. - - - .. — . . - -- - . - ...._ . -.... ... - . .. .. . DIGITAL DIAZO 1 B.sxn ID la let> •.1-1-10LE .Gbc •CHICAGO •WIRE-0 - : , ... " . ' XEROX COLOR/PREPRESS MOUNTING G 3OND H VELLUM DU MYLAR GP HEAVY BOND OTHER PLonime A BLUELI NE B BLACKLINE C SEPIA PAPER HE HEAVY BLACKUIE E HEAVY BROWNLINE OTHER PHOTO ONE SIDED 8.sx‘t TWO SIDED II) I 7 ONE SIDED 110 7 7W0 SIDED COVERSTOCK OTHER aINDERY PUNCH SCREW CL COLOR LASER CT COLOR TRANSFAILENCY CF FILM OUIPUT CP PAPER OUTPuT OTHEIt OFFSET FCVM. WISE FO AM coreE FCmill BLACK FOAM OLDIE W ffE GATORBOARO GBM Lm-i 001.18 BLACK GATORBOARD I LAMINATING •AUTOCAD PLT _ DwG • bUCROSTAlION "----.' ' 7,- , . M WASH-OFF MYLAR N FIXED MYLAR 1 SUPER K -_- OTHER 7-• -,--.. ' - :-- -:' - : ••;• -•-':;- J PRINTING JT TYPESETTING '.' OTHER LAM HEAT L AF.I IN ATING LCE COLD LAMINATING UN UV PROTECTIVE -- 1 - . . . .:-. -- .."-.-,;;•:: ...sdre. . -- -t - --• '- 1..:.;,--z--•,; ' _.,,,' •=-4:4A;,-,:-: ; , '/„A • PLANNED ACTION INITIAL QUALIFICATIONS AND CHECKLIST MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION RECEDED FEB 19 2002 DEVELOPMENT City of Tukwila Department of community Development Proponent Museum of Flight_ 9404 E. Marginal Way S. Seattle, WA 98108 Richard Beckerman, Vice President and COO February 11, 2002 Point of Contact Jeanne Iannucci, AIA, NBBJ (206) 223 -5081 • • A. BACKGROUND 1. Date checklist prepared: February 11, 2001 2. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Phase Al Construction is proposed to commence in May 2002 and complete in December 2003. Phase A2 may also be completed in the same time frame or at a later date. Phases B and C are planned for future development. 3. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. All foreseeable future phases are included in this proposal. 4. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If,yes, explain. Yes, this proposal is affected by the demolition of hangar A and the removal of hangar B, both immediately to the north of the proposed expansion. FAA approval and City of Tukwila approval of that work is pending. 5. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Federal: Federal Aviation Administration: • Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration — FAA Form 7460 -1 • Approval of Land Exchange between Museum of Flight and King County International Airport. State of Washington • Electrical permits • Elevator permits King County: None known at this time City of Tukwila /Local: • State Environmental Policy Act Review /Approval • Construction Permits • Utilities Approvals 6. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Environmental Checklist 1 • • This project consists of a 349,000 sf expansion to the existing Museum of Flight adjacent to Ry 31 L /13R at the King County International Airport. Exterior materials used will include glass walls similar to existing, ceramic tile walls similar to existing, metal siding walls, and white or Tight colored membrane roofs with glass or plastic skylights. The existing metal and glass roofing will be retained but will probably not be carried over into the new expansion. Revisions will be made to the AOA fence line. Upon project completion, large aircraft may be occaisionally parked for short periods of time in the Aircraft Display Area as coordinated with King County International Airport. Also included are 40,000 sf of alterations internal to the existing facility. Also included is the removal of two existing small- aircraft hangars. The hangars will be replaced or rebuilt on a nearby site (lot 13 & 14) as part of a related project. The project will be built in phases as shown on the attached site plans. 7. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila at 9404 East Marginal Way South. Please see: Exhibit A, Legal Description. Exhibit B, Vicinity Map. Exhibit C, Project Drawings, which include Site Plan — Phase Al Site Plan — Phase A2 Site Plan — Master Plan - Phase A1, A2, B and C 8. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive land Use Policy Map as environmentally sensitive? No B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? The steepest slope on the site is approximately 6.5 %. During phase Al a small landscaped area with a 25% slope will be created. Environmental Checklist 2 • • c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Refer to geotechnical report, Exhibit D. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. The site will be graded and excavated as required for building foundations, utilities and installing parking pavement, aircraft taxilane and tie -down pavement, and landscaping. Approximate fill and grading quantities are as follows: Phase Al: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and'utilities will be approximately 21,981 cubic yards. Location of disposal site has not yet been determined. Approximately 1,078 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 311 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre- approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. Phase A2: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and utilities will be approximately 22,632 cubic yards. Location of disposal site has not yet been determined. Approximately 3,628 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 739 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre- approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. Phase 8: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and utilities will be approximately 6,409 cubic yards. Location of disposal site has not yet been determined. Approximately 1,456 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 1,432 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre- approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. Environmental Checklist 3 • • Phase C: Grading and excavation for new building foundations, paving and utilities will be approximately 4,298 cubic yards. Location of disposal site has not yet been determined. Approximately 23,168 cubic yards of engineered structural fill material will be installed below the new building foundations and 1,420 cubic yards of structural base material below new asphalt paving. The source of fill has not yet been determined. Fill is expected to be provided from a pre- approved gravel supply source. Existing asphalt is currently planned on being ground and recycled within the crushed surfacing layers of the proposed pavement section. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Yes. Precipitation and surface runoff may cause erosion during grading and construction. At the completion of each phase, erosion impacts are not anticipated, as the site will be fully built out including landscaping. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The 436,800 SF site is currently covered by buildings and impervious paved surfaces, with some lawn areas and street trees. Approximately 89,930 SF of new landscaping will be installed leaving approximately 79% of the site covered with impervious surfaces after project completion. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Some or all of the following standards methods of mitigation will be used, as appropriate: 1) Silt fencing will be placed around the perimeter of large open excavations. 2) Filter fabric will be laid between the frame and grate of all catch basins and manholes that may be subject to silt laden runoff. The filter fabric physical condition will be inspected at regular intervals, such as daily and after all rain events, to ensure it is properly functioning. 3) Straw bales will be installed around catch basin grates or in drainage paths when silt laden runoff conditions become too heavy for the filter fabric and silt fencing methods listed above. 4) asphalt and concrete surfaces will be swept daily during extensive grading operations to minimize silt laden storm water runoff potential. 5) Soil stockpiles will be fully covered to minimize contact with rainfall. 6) Disturbed areas that are exposed for over a week will be stabilized and covered with straw if required to minimize the contact with rainfall. 2. Air Environmental Checklist 4 • • a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (Le., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. During construction, vehicle and construction equipment emissions and dust will be released. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Mitigation measures will be implemented as required to meet or exceed all applicable standards as required by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency and the Department of Ecology. Additional potential mitigation measures to reduce emissions include ensuring that machines and equipment used during construction are well maintained, and wetting the site as required to reduce fugitive dust emissions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. At the closest point, the project site is approximately 250 feet east of the Duwamish Waterway. At no point is it as close as 200 feet from the waterway. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Environmental Checklist 5 • • No 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage: industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water runoff (including storm - water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Planned Development East of E. Marginal Way South: Existing: The source of water runoff is rainfall from asphalt at an automobile parking area, roofs, and subsurface drains. The current method of collection is with catch basins and roof drains collected and discharged to an existing 18 -inch diameter pipe at the north east corner of the site. The subsurface drains are pumped from an existing lift station near the northeast corner of the Red Barn into a nearby catch basin on the gravity conveyance system which also discharges to the 18- inch pipe described above. The existing storm drain system contains a detention structure comprised of 3 -54 inch diameter pipes each approximately 100 -feet long, and is located in the "grasscrete" display area east of the existing building. This detention system is expected to remain. The existing 18 -inch storm drain connects to the King County Airport conveyance system, flows to the north and turns to the west, and ultimately discharges to the Duwamish waterway. Proposed: The source of water runoff, method of collection and disposal for the proposed expansion will be essentially the same as described above. Existing storm drain conveyance piping which conflicts with the footprints of the new building additions will be relocated around the building, but will ultimately connect to the existing system in the same location. Environmental Checklist 6 • • Runoff quantities have not yet been calculated, however, the addition of impervious area as a result of this project is very small. Because of this, runoff quantities are expected to be negligibly higher than existing conditions. Planned Development West of E. Marginal Way South: Existing: The source of water runoff is rainfall from asphalt at an automobile parking area, and roofs. The current method of collection is with catch basins and roof drains collected and discharged to an existing 18 -inch diameter pipe at the north west corner of the site near the existing water tank which is part of the Boeing storm drain system. This system also discharges directly to the Duwamish waterway through an existing 30 -inch storm drain. We are currently awaiting confirmation from Boeing that it is acceptable to discharge flows to their existing system Proposed: The source of water runoff, method of collection and disposal for the proposed expansion will be essentially the same as described above. Existing storm drain conveyance piping which conflicts with the footprints of the new building additions will be relocated around the building, but will ultimately connect to the existing system in the same location. Overall stormwater flows will remain unchanged since the amount of impervious area is unchanged after the expansion. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Waste materials will not be able to enter surface waters provided the water quality measures proposed are inspected and maintained on a regular basis, and kept in operating condition . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The City of Tukwila has indicated that stormwater detention is not required for the new expansion. We have also asked the King County Airport Engineer if the County will require stormwater detention since we are connecting to their conveyance system, however, no response has been received yet. At this time, no additional detention capacity is being proposed for the increased impervious areas. Proposed water quality facilities include a wet vault and an oil /water separator that will provide a mechanical means to reduce sediment and heavy metals from being discharged, as well as provide separation of floatable contaminants such as oil and grease. 4. Plants a. Types of vegetation found on the site: Environmental Checklist 7 • Deciduous tree: Birch, various ornamental trees such as flowering pear and magnolias Evergreen tree: ornamental pines, Doug fir Shrubs: various ornamental shrubs such as Portugal laurel, Nandina, Dwarf Strawberry Tree, groundcovers and grass Wet soil plants: none Other water plants: none b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? In various phases, trees and grass areas will be altered as described below. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: In phase Al, additional street trees will be planted, and the existing footprint of a building to be removed will be covered in newly planted grass. In phase A2 some existing grass areas will be replaced by building. In phase B some grass area will be replaced by building and paving, and some ornamentals will be planted. In phase C. some street trees and parking lot ornamental plantings will be added. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site Birds: seagulls, crows Mammals: none observed Fish live in the nearby Duwamish Waterway. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: Unknown d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Utilize temporary erosion, long term storm water and hazardous materials control systems and best management practices to prevent contaminated discharges into the Duwamish Waterway. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Environmental Checklist 8 • • Electricity and natural gas will be used for lighting, to condition the buildings and artifacts, for exhibit displays, to heat domestic.water, and, in phase B only, for cooking and refrigeration in a commercial kitchen. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The design will be in compliance with the energy codes and minimize the wasteful use of energy. The mechanical system will be commissioned to ensure proper functioning of systems (within and between systems) which will result in maximizing operational efficiency. Fixtures in toilet rooms will be low -flow and include electronic user sensors to minimize water usage, which includes energy to heat domestic hot water. Occupancy sensors for lighting fixtures will be considered where appropriate 'to minimize energy waste in lighting unoccupied rooms. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe: Usual oils, greases, fuel and solvents will be present during construction. In addition please see the attached Phase I / II Environmental Site Assessment (regarding underground tanks) by Geo Engineers and the attached Hazardous Building Materials Survey (for hangars A and B to be demolished) by Shannon and Wilson. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required: No special emergency services will be required. The hazardous materials involved are commonly used at other locations at the airport and are reasonably expected to be within the capability of existing emergency service operations. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Low -VOC finish materials will be specified wherever possible to provide the best quality indoor air environment. Specifically, these materials include sealants, paints, composite and wood products, and carpets. The use of these materials will also minimize environmental health hazards to workers producing and installing the products. In addition, rooms where chemicals are stored or used will be directly vented. In rooms where copiers are used, the location of the copier will be as close to the return air vent as possible. b. Noise Environmental Checklist 9 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is adjacent to King County International Airport and Interstate 5 Highway, both of which generate significant levels of noise. However, the museum has successfully coexisted with these uses in the past, so no noise - related impacts are anticipated. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Temporary noise impacts during construction are anticipated. Construction projects of this type typically produce noise levels which range from 68 to 98 dba at 50 feet from the specific equipment. The project will replace existing private light aircraft hangars with tie - downs. These aircraft will continue to utilize existing runway and taxiway systems for take -off and landing as they do now. See attached Traffic Impact Assessment for discussion of automobile traffic. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. The site is adjacent to an existing runway and is not near residential uses. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The east site is currently used for a museum and its parking. In addition, some property is being added to the east site which was used for light aircraft hangars. The KCIA has agreed to this change of use because of the provision of tie -downs on site, and also replacement hangars on a nearby site. The west site is currently used for an office building and its parking. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe: No c. Describe any structures on the site. On the east site there is an existing museum which will be expanded. To the north of that are two small (19,000 and 15,500 sf), metal, one -story, light- aircraft hangar buildings. On the west site there is a two -story, tilt -up concrete, office / warehouse building of about 35,000 sf. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes. The two hangars will be demolished or removed for the construction of phase Al. The office / warehouse building will be demolished for the construction of phase C. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Environmental Checklist 10 • • MIC /H f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? MIC /H g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Not applicable. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Museum of Flight has a staff of approximately 86 full time and 52 part time employees which would increase to 183 full time and 168 part time over the course of all the phases. In addition, the museum currently has about 500 docents and other types of part-time volunteers. At the end of phase C there may be as many as 1000 volunteers. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: None 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None Environmental Checklist 11 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The tallest building, at about 110' above grade, will be built in phase C. Phases Al and C will be clad primarily with metal siding on a concrete base. Phase A2, B and C will also include glass curtainwall and glass storefront systems. In Phase B there will also be ceramic tile used as an exterior wall surface. All phases will use a sheet membrane roof such as TPO. b. c. 11. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The Museum of Flight Expansion will be very pleasing aesthetically. Light and glare a. What type of light.or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Phase Al will cause no new Tight and glare impacts. Phase A2 will have a west - facing glass wall which could generate some glare toward East Marginal Way as the sun is descending. Phase B will have east facing glass which is not expected to have' significantly more reflection than the east facing glass that it is replacing. Phase C will have a large expanse of east facing glass which could generate some glare toward East Marginal Way and the airfield as the sun is ascending. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Glare reflecting off of glass surfaces can always pose a safety hazard. However it is momentary, as persons in moving vehicles move into and out of the glare impacted area. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control Tight and glare impacts, if any? None 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The Museum of Flight is a recreational destination. Environmental Checklist 12 b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Expanding the Museum of Flight will increase its recreational capacity. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Yes. On August 26, 1971, before it was moved to its present location, the existing Red Barn was placed on the National Register of Historic Places, listed as the "Boeing Airplane Company Building ". The National Register Listing number is 71000872. It is also on the Washington Heritage Register. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. The Museum of Flight is a culturally important landmark. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Expanding the Museum of Flight will increase awareness of and access to this culturally significant institution. In phase A2, the historic Red Barn will be enclosed within the museum expansion, protecting it as an artifact. With regard to construction, if artifacts are uncovered during construction, work in that area will be halted pending notification and response from appropriate agencies. Note that previous excavations on site have disclosed no indications of archeological significance. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The Museum is served by East Marginal Way South and entranced through a signalized intersection at S. 96th Place. An existing museum parking lot exit which also serves as a museum restaurant access is currently located at S. 94th Place. It will be moved about 350 feet further north. See the attached Traffic Impact Assessment and site plans. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop: Yes Environmental Checklist 13 c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? See the attached Traffic Impact Assessment and Access Permit for the Use of Boeing Parking Lots. Parking counts will be increased as follows: The existing museum has 374 parking stalls on -site. In Phase Al the parking count on -site will be a total of at least 480 spaces: east site 380, west site 100. (The west site has 180 stalls available, however the museum might choose to use up to 80 of them for aircraft storage, so that about 100 would remain for staff and overflow visitor parking). In Phase A2 the phase Al on -site parking count will be maintained. In Phase B the on -site count would increase to at least 500 total: east site 400, west site at least 100 out of 180 per above. At Phase C the on -site parking count will be a total of at least 510 spaces: east site 400, west site 110. In addition, in all phases, Boeing lot A, immediately adjacent south of the east site, is available for use by the museum evenings and weekends, coinciding with peak demands. Lot A provides an additional capacity of 360. In addition, in all phases, Boeing lot B, across the street, is available for overflow parking use by the museum on weekends. It provides an additional 320 spaces and is intended for Blue Angels visits and other special events, when attendance figures are extraordinary. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). There will be modification to the existing public signal at E. Marginal Way and S. 94th Place. See the Traffic Impact Assessment. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Yes. Project will occur adjacent to King County International Airport. Museum air shows, biplane rides and visiting aircraft will occasionally use the KCIA runways to access the museum, as they do now. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes would occur. Please see attached Traffic Impact Assessment. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Please see attached Traffic Impact Assessment. Environmental Checklist 14 • • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. None is anticipated. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. None 16. Utilities a. Circle currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer and storm sewer are currently available with sufficient capacity to accommodate the requirements of this proposal. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Needed utility distribution systems for the project are already in place. Utility Water Electricity Natural Gas Telephone Sewer C. Signature Purveyor Tukwila Seattle City Light Washington Natural Gas Qwest Tukwila / Metro The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Richard Beckerman, Museum of Flight Date Submitted: Exhibits Legal Description A Vicinity Map B Environmental Checklist 15 • • Project Drawings including Site Plans C Geotechnical Report D Boeing_Storm Drain Agreement E (to be submitted as soon as available) Traffic Impact Assessment F Access Permit for Use of .Boeing Parking Lots G Phase I / II Environmental Site Assessment H Hazardous Buildings Materials Survey J Approval of FAA.7460 Application K (to be submitted as soon as available) Environmental Checklist 16 Attachment lo Planned Action Initial Qualifications and Checklist Museum of Flight Expansion January 25, 2002 sett • :,7.AL[/;�, 7 32'30" °65 1263 h Y1 Ra d Golf and '\ Country CrA. ;i II tt`, '52 SEATTLE.TACCMA AIRPGRT 5.7 KM ) 17'30" 4000 154 5000 METERS 100 12 000 14 000 16 000 FEET �1 \ 5 KM TO INTERSTATE 405 \ J / TACOMA 47 KM SEATTLE SOUTH, WASHINGTON N4730—W12215/7.5x15 '162 461°)"N 47°30' 122 °15' ASEIZEZAVeg • December 3, 2001 8 -6W 18 -MPM -173 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 The Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA FEB 1 9 2 2 PERMIT CENTER Attention: Mr. Ralph A. Bufano Subject: Access Permit for use of Boeing Parking Lots in Tukwila, Washington Dear Mr. Bufano: The Museum of Flight Foundation ( "Permittee ") has requested permission to enter a portion of the properties owned or leased by The Boeing Company ( "Boeing ") and known as the Boeing Parking Lots at the Developmental Center, located in the City of Tukwila, Washington as shown in the drawing attached as Exhibit A'attached hereto (the "Property ") for the purpose of overflow parking for events held by the Permittee (the "Activity "). The Property consists of one parking lot located south of the Museum of Flight, and referred to in this agreement (and shown on Exhibit A) as "Lot A" and one parking lot located on the west side of East Marginal Way, and referred to in this agreement (and shown on Exhibit A) as "Lot B." Boeing hereby grants Permittee its permission to use the Property for such purpose, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Permittee will contact Boeing to schedule Permittee's entries onto and use of the Property. The Property will be provided on a scheduled basis to Permittee at no charge at these times: Lot A will be available to Permittee from no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and no later than 6:00 p.m. on scheduled weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and no earlier than 5:00 p.m. and no later than 12:00 midnight on scheduled weekdays from December 15, 2001 through December 14, 2006: Lot B will be available to Permittee from no earlier than 7:00 a.m. and no later than 6:00 p.m. on scheduled weekends (Saturday and Sunday from December 15, 2001 through December 14, 2006 2. Permittee shall at all times comply with Boeing's security and safety rules and will comply with the directions of Boeing's security personnel. 3. Permittee will limit its activities at the Property to the activities outlined above. Permittee will not release onto the Property or any neighboring property or into the air or the surface water or groundwater any chemicals, contaminants, hazardous materials or dangerous wastes as the same may be defined or regulated by any federal, state, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, decree, regulation or judgment related to the protection of the environment or of human health. Permittee will obtain and comply with the terms of all licenses, permits, and approvals required by any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Activity. Museum of Flight Foundation December 3, 2001 Page 2 of 4 4. Permittee will indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, Boeing, its subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and assigns (hereinafter "Indemnitees ") from and against all actions, causes of action, 0)1- liabilities, claims, suits, penalties, fines, judgments, liens, awards, and damages of any kind whatsoever (hereinafter "Claims "), for injury to or death of any person (including BOE/NG without limitation claims brought by employees or invitees of Permittee or employees or invitees of any Contractor of Permittee (hereinafter "Contractor ")) or damage to or loss of any property or clean up of any discharge or release by Permittee or any Contractor, and expenses, costs of litigation, and reasonable attorneys fees related thereto, or incident to establishing the right to indemnification, to the extent such Claims arise out of or are in any way related to this permit or the presence,on the Property of Permittee, any Contractor or their respective employees or invitees. Permittee expressly waives any immunity under industrial insurance whether arising from Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington or any other statute or source, to the extent of the indemnity set forth in this paragraph. In the event that Permittee is successful in proving that the foregoing indemnity is limited by RCW 4.24.115, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnitees to the full extent allowed by RCW 4.24.115. In no event shall Permittee's obligations hereunder be limited to the extent of any insurance available to or provided by Permittee. Permittee shall require each Contractor who desires access to the Property to provide an indemnity, enforceable by and for the benefit of the Indemnitees, to the same extent required of the Permittee. 5. Permittee shall carry and maintain, and ensure that any Contractor carries and maintains, Commercial General Liability Insurance with available limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, including death, and property damage combined, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) general aggregate. Such insurance shall be in a form and with insurers acceptable to Boeing and shall contain coverage for all premises and operations, broad form property damage and contractual liability (including without limitation, that specifically assumed herein). Any policy which provides the insurance required under this paragraph shall: (a) be endorsed to name The Boeing Company and its subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees, agents, attorneys and assigns" as additional insureds (hereinafter "Additional Insured ") with respect to any liability arising out of the presence of Permittee, or any Contractor, or any invitee of Permittee, or invitee of such Contractor, on the Property, (b) be endorsed to be primary to any insurance maintained by The Boeing Company, (c) contain a severability of interest provision in favor of the Additional Insured and (d) contain a waiver of any rights of subrogation against the Additional Insured. Museum of Flight Foundation December 3, 2001 Page 3 of 4 If licensed vehicles will be used in connection with this permit, Permittee shall carry and maintain, and shall ensure that any Contractor who uses licensed vehicles in connection with this permit carries and maintains, Automobile Liability insurance covering all vehicles, whether owned, hired, rented, borrowed or otherwise, with limits of liability of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage. Permittee shall cover or maintain, and shall ensure that any Contractor covers or maintains, insurance in accordance with the applicable laws relating to workers' compensation, with respect to all of their respective employees working on or about the Property, regardless of whether such coverage of insurance is mandatory or merely elective under the law. Permittee shall not access the Property unless Permittee shall have first provided for Boeing's review and approval, a certificate of insurance reflecting full compliance with the requirements set forth herein. Such certificate shall list The Boeing Company as certificate holder and shall be kept current and in compliance throughout the period of this permit and shall provide for thirty (30) days advance written notice to Boeing in the event of cancellation. 6. Boeing shall have the right at any time to terminate this Permit by giving Permittee written notice of such termination. Permittee waives and releases Boeing from any and all claims resulting from termination by Boeing of this Permit. 7. BOEING MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND TO PERMITTEE CONCERNING THE PROPERTY, ITS CONDITION OR FITNESS FOR PERMITTEE'S PURPOSES. PERMITTEE ACCEPTS THE PROPERTY IN ITS "AS -IS" CONDITION AND HEREBY WAIVES, RELEASES, AND RENOUNCES ANY AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST BOEING RELATING TO THE PROPERTY, ITS CONDITION, OR ITS FITNESS FOR PERMITTEE'S PURPOSES, INCLUDING CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF OR ALLEGING BOEING'S FAULT OR NEGLIGENCE, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY AND ALL CLAIMS RELATING TO OR ARISING OUT OF ANY DAMAGE TO ANY AIRCRAFT OWNED BY, IN THE POSSESSION OF, OR BEING DELIVERED TO PERMITTEE. 8. Upon completion of the Activity, Permittee will quit the Property, having first removed all debris from the Property and having restored the Property as nearly as possible to the same condition it was in at the commencement of Permittee's use thereof, normal wear and tear excepted. Museum of Flight Foundation December 3, 2001 Page 4 of 4 9. Each party hereby designates an authorized representative to administer this Agreement. Notices should be sent to: Tom E. Lambro Planning The Boeing Company P. 0. Box 3999, M/C 46 -88 Seattle, WA 98124 -2207 Phone: 206 - 655 -5869 10. INTENTIONALLY OMITTED. Ralph A. Bufano Executive Director 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Phone:. 206 - 764 -5700 11. Permittee may accept this Agreement by signing a counterpart of this letter and returning it to Boeing no later than December 15, 2001. If the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding of our agreement with respect to these matters, please indicate your acceptance and approval below. Permittee or any Contractor shall not access the Property unless Permittee shall have first provided one conformed copy of the signed Permit along with the certificate of insurance required above to Tom Lambro at the address listed above. ACCEPTED and Museum of Very truly yours, THE BOEING COMPANY Marty Martinson Director of Facilities, Seattle District AGREED this day of raz•-"—^ , 2001. t Foundation xecu ve Dire or �i� P�F T`(►� ' 1�11RfA}IA 1fAfffIR1AAA IIIIIOIIIIO111111IIIL viii.,:: r'‘.1° • Ciiy of Tukwila .ESA Screening, Checklist City of Tukwviia Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist Date: /4/ EOa -ao-2 RECEIVED Applicant Name: 7r�G�S�G'/7;' / r i / i d / b ' d / // City, State. Zin: ]�l�j�i Z /ii // . Telephoner, 2k) 7 / 57' Street Address: FEB 19 2002 DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS This Screening Checklist has been designed to evaluate the potential for your project to result in potential "take" of chinook salmon, coho salmon, or cutthroat trout as defined by Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. The checklist includes a series of "Yes" or "No" questions about your project, organized into four parts. Starting with Part A on Page 1, read each question carefully. circle "Yes" or "No," and proceed to the next question as directed by the checklist. To answer these questions, you may need to refer to site plans, 'grading and drainage oians, critical areas studies, or other documents you have prepared for your project. The City will evaluate your responses to determine if "take" is indicated. January 2001 City of T vila ESA Screening Checklisr Part A: Please review and answer each question carefully. Consider all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the net question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1-0 Will the project reauire any forrn of grading? Grading is defined as any excavating, filling, clearing, or creation of impervious surface, or any combination thereof, which alters the existing ground surface of the earth (see Tukwila Municipal Code (TlvIC) Chapter 13.06, Zoning Code, Page 18-1 1). Please circle appropriate response NO - Continue to Question ? -0 OYES ./4! �� c�' +r�� %!' vo1/:.1 i Continue to Question 1 -1 (Page k 2-0 Will the project require any form of clearing? Clearing means the removal or causing to be "11 -7/:.!'"7 removed, through either direct or indirect actions, any vegetation n-om a site (see Chapter 18.06. Page 18 -8). Please circle appropriate response. NO -- Continue to Question 3 -0 YES)- Continue to Question 2 -1 (Page 4) 3 -0 Will the project require work, during any time of the project, below the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers or in wetlands? Ordinary high water mark is the mark that is found by examining the bed and banks of a scream and . ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual as to distinctly mark the soil from that of the abutting upland, in respect to vegetation (see TMC Chapter 18.06, Page 18 -15). Please circle appropriate response. v V - Continue to Question 4 -0 YES - Continue to Question 3 -1 (Page 5) 4-0 Will the project result in the processing or handling, storage, or treatment of hazardous substances? This does not include the proper use of fuel stored in a vehicle's fuel tank. Hazardous substances are any liquid, solid, gas, or sludge, including any material, substance, product, commodity, or waste, regardless of quantity; that exhibits the characteristics or criteria of hazardous waste as defined by Washington Administrative Code 173 -303 (see TIM Chapter 18.06, Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 13 -11). This includes fuel or other chemicals stored on -site during construction. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 5 -0 YES - Continue to Question 5 -0 5 -0 Will the project result in the withdrawal, injection, or interception of groundwater? Examples of projects that may affect groundwater include, but are not limited to: construction of a new well, change in water withdrawals from an existing well, projects involving prolonged construction dewatering, projects installing French drains or interceptor trenches, and sewer lines. For the purpose of this analysis, projects that require a geotechnical report pursuant to the requirements of TMC 13.45.060 and 18.45.080E.4, or would require a geotechnical report if not exempt under TMC 13.4:7.080A, should answer Yes. Please circle appropriate tfL'� .C5,%(7 :(9/i ' /C° -Uj' /rte .. • C� t `/CS/7 response. • (NO - Continue to Question 6 -0 YES)- Continue to Question 6 -0 January 25, 2001 Part A (continued) City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist 6 -0 Will the project involve landscaping or re- occurring. outdoor maintenance that includes the regular use of fertilizers, pesticides, or herbicides? This does not include the one-time e use im., us., of transplant fertilizers. Landscaping means natural ve?etaLIOn such as trees, shrubs, groundcover, and other landscape materials arangedin a manner to produce an aesthetic effect appropriate for the use of the land (see TMC Chanter 18.06. Tukwila Zoning Code, Page 18- 13). For the purpose of this analysis, this includes the establishment of new lawn or _rras ;. Please circle appropriate response. NO — Checklist Complete /."/v' '�ii��,�. (YES T Checklist Complete Part B: Please answer each question below for projects that include grading. Review each question carefully; considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the nest question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 1 -1 Will the project involve the modification of a watercourse bank or bank of the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers between the ordinary high water mark and top of bank? This includes any projects that will require grading. on any slope leading to a river or stream, but will not require work below the ordinary high water mark. Work below the ordinary high water mark is covered in Part C. Please circle appropriate response. (NO)Continue to Question 1 -2 YES - Continue to Question 1 -2 1-2 Could the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project result in sediment transport off site or increased rates of erosion and/or sedimentation in watercourses, the Green/Duwamish rivers, or the Black River? Most projects that involve ;;-tiding have the potential to result in increased erosion and/or sedimentation as a result of disturbances to the soil or earth. If your project involves grading and you have not prepared a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan specifically designed to retain 100 percent of the runoff (including during construction) from impervious surface or disturbed soils, answer Yes to this question. If your project is normally e tempt under the Tukwila Municipal Code and would not require the preparation of a Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, BUT may still result in erosion or sediment transport off site or beyond the work area. answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 1 -3 YES - Continue to Question 1 -3 1-3 Will the project result in the construction of new impervious surfaces? Impervious surfaces include those hard .surfaces which prevent or restrict the entry of water into the soil in the manner that such water entered the soils under natural conditions prior to development: or a hard surface area that causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow from the flow presented under natural conditions prior to development (see TMC Chapter 18.06. Tukwila Zoning Code. Page 18 -12). Such areas include, but are not limited to. rooftops. asphalt or concrete paving. compacted surfaces, or other surfaces that similarly affect the natural infiltration or runoff patterns existing, prior to development. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 2 -0 !,Page _; - U�� /��i ;,' �;,4 '. YES - Continue to Question 1 -4 .ianucry 25, 2001 Ciry of T vita ESA Screening, Checklist Pal's B (coniinued) 1 -4 Will your project generate stornwater from the creation of impervious surfaces that will not be infiltrated on site? For the purpose of this analysis, infiltration includes the use of a stormwater treatment and management system intended to contain all stormwater on site by allowing it to seep into pervious surface or through other means to be introduced into the ground. If your project involves the construction of impervious surface and does not include the design of a storm ;eater management system specifically desiied to infiltrate stornwater. answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. (NO Continue to Question 2 =0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -0 (Page 2) Parr C: Please review each question below for projects that include clearing. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 2 -1 Will the project involve clearing within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. YO \ Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 2 -2 2 -2 Will the project involve clearing of any trees within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? A tree is defined by TMC 18.06.845 as any self - supporting woody plant, characterized by one main trunk, with a potential diameter- breast- height of 2 inches or more and potential minimum height of 10 feet. Please circle appropriate response. (YO Continue to Question 2 -3 YES - Continue to Question 2 -3 2 -3 Will the project involve clearing of any evergreen trees from within 200 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis evergreen means any tree that does not regularly lose all its leaves or needles in the fall. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 2 -4 YES - Continue to Question � -4 2 -4 Wiil the project involve clearing within 100 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreenjDuwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. `lO.' Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 1) YES - Continue to Question 2-5 2 Will the project involve clearing within 40 feet of the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the GreeniDuwamish or Black Rivers? Please circle appropriate response. l 1. NO j Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 3 -0 (Page 2) Januar., 2.5: = 00 / • City of Tukwila ESA Screening Checklist Part D: Please review each question below for projects that include work below the ordinary high water mark of watercourses or the Duwamish/Green or Black Rivers or in wetlands. Review each question carefully, considering all phases of your project including, but not limited to, construction, normal operation, potential emergency operation, and ongoing and scheduled maintenance. Continue to the next question as directed for each No or Yes answer. 3 -1 Will the project involve the direct alteration of the channel or bed of a watercourse. the Green/Duwamish rivers. cr Black River? For the purpose of this analysis, channel means the area between the ordinary high water mark of both banks of a stream, and bed means the stream bottom substrates, typically within the normal wetted -width of a stream. This includes both temporary and permanent modifications. Please circle .appropriate response. (NJ Continue' to Question 3 -2 YES - Continue to Question 3 -2 3 -2 Will the project involve any physical alteration to a watercourse or wetland connected to the Green/Duwamish River? For the purpose of this analysis. "connected to the river means" flowing into via a surface connection or culvert, or having other physical characteristics that allow for access by salmonids. This includes impacts to areas such as sloughs, side channels, remnant oxbows, ditches formed from channelized portions of natural watercourses ,or any area that may provide off channel rearing habitat for juvenile fish from the Duwamish River. This includes both temporary construction alterations and permanent modifications. Watercourses or wetlands draining to the Green/Duwamish River that have a hanging culvert, culvert with a flap gate, diversion, or any entirely man -made or artificial structure that precludes fish access should answer Yes to this question. Please circle appropriate response. �i NO Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project result in the construction of a new structure or hydraulic condition that could be a barrier to salmonid passage within the watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, a barrier means any artificial or human modified structure or hydraulic condition that inhibits the natural upstream or downstream movement of salmonids, including both juveniles and aduits. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -4 YES - Continue to Question 3 -4 3 -4 Will the project involve a temporary or permanent change in the cross - sectional area of a watercourse or the Green/Duwainish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, the cross - sectional area is defined as a profile taken from the ordinary high water mark on the right bank to the ordinary high water mark on the left bank. Please circle appropriate response. (NO - Continue to Question 3-5 YES - Continue to Question 3 -5 3-5 Will the project require the removal of debris from within the ordinary high water mark of a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers? For the purpose of this analysis, debris includes, but is.not limited to fallen trees. Togs, shrubs. rocks. piles, rip -rap, submerged metal. and broken concrete or other buiiding materials. Projects that would require debris removal from a watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers as parr of a maintenance activity should answer Yes to this Question. Please circle appropriate response. / - Continue to Question 3 -6 YES - Continue to Question 3 -6 ✓anucry 25. 2001 Cit) ofTz vila ESA Screening Checklist Part D (continued) 3-16 Will the project result in impacts to watercourses or wetlands that have a surface. connection to another watercourse or the Green/Duwamish or Black Rivers but do not contain habitat conditions that support salmonid use? Such areas may include, but not be limited to hillside seeps and wetlands isolated from the watercourse or river that have a surface water connection to the watercourse or river but are not assessable, nor would be assessable to salmonids under natural conditions. Wetlands with a ";unctions and values" rating for basefowisroundwater suppon of 9 and above (or moderate) as described in Cooke (1996) should be included. Please circle appropriate response. Continue to Question 3 -7 YES - Continue to Question 3-7 3 -7 Will the project include the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands connected to a watercourse containing salmonids? For the purpose of this analysis, the construction of artificial waterways or wetlands includes wetlands, channels, sloughs, or other habitat feature created to enhance wildlife use, particularly waterfowl use, or may be attractive to wildlife, particularly waterfowl. Please circle appropriate response. N Continue to Question 3 -3 YES - Continue to Question 3 -3 3 -3 Will the project include bank stabilization? For the purpose of this analysis, bank stabilization includes, but is not limited to, rip -rap, rock, log, soil, or vegetated revetments, concrete structures, or similar structures. Please circle appropriate response. NO Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) YES - Continue to Question 4 -0 (Page 2) ,ianuar.' 2f. 2001 ` • RECENT CITY OF TUKWILA CRY OF TUKWILq SEPA Department of Community Development 9 2002 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 0.t PLANNED Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -. • CENTER E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us ACTION APPLICATION NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: A 5 "U /� _Wic) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. fob // 1/ 7,13c (5-kz, y24 - / z U /2y-D7 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making author'.y on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with th City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Jae- Address: /L / % / » o, C5• CSIi /fly .2r3. ) l s 1 ( Phone: r , �Z `` • �.r. =� / _ FAX:,_) l02h. - % /61r Sig VAM°/. �' /!� Date: /1 �- J G:IAPPHANILANDUSE.APPIsplan.doc, 06/13/00 3 FOR STAFF USE UNLY Sierra Type: P -PACT Planner: G A.m.1 1---u4-40 File Number: a O t... obi Application Complete: (Date: bi Ho.. ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete: (Date: ) MIC Planned Action EIS File Number: E96 -0034 Other File Number: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: A 5 "U /� _Wic) LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL TAX LOT NUMBERS. fob // 1/ 7,13c (5-kz, y24 - / z U /2y-D7 Quarter: Section: Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR: The individual who: • has decision making author'.y on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with th City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Jae- Address: /L / % / » o, C5• CSIi /fly .2r3. ) l s 1 ( Phone: r , �Z `` • �.r. =� / _ FAX:,_) l02h. - % /61r Sig VAM°/. �' /!� Date: /1 �- J G:IAPPHANILANDUSE.APPIsplan.doc, 06/13/00 3 Hazardous Building Materials Survey Museum of Flight Expansion Seattle, Washington RECEIVED FEB 19 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SHANNON WILSON, INC. OEOTECNNICAL ,ANO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS At Shannon (i Wil -sun, our mission is to be a progressive, well - managed professional ,orlaultiug firm in the folds of engineering and up/'lied card, s our cc/Tire`. With the /rig/1,:.,l ,l,grec ,'I prole.,.,iunuh.tm tl iih dui ,'ortsideranOf to the hL'.,1 inlcv'c.,t., of Mt' pd(lhi;,., our, lie ;na, Lind rill ,'mplovec.t'. November 2001 Submitted To: Mr. Bart Heath The Seneca Real Estate Group 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2350 Seattle, Washington 98101 By: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98103 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Shannon & Wilson, Inc. completed a hazardous building materials survey of Boeing Building 14 -06 (Building 14 -06) located at 8700 East Marginal Way and Hangars A and B on the property adjacent to the current Museum of Flight property. This work was performed in anticipation of demolition of the site buildings. This hazardous materials survey consisted of an asbestos survey, lead -based paint survey, and an inventory of fluorescent light fixtures with polychlorinated biphenyls- (PCB -) containing ballasts. The asbestos survey was conducted to comply with the asbestos good -faith survey requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 -62 -077 and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) Regulation III, Article 4, prior to demolition activities. This report includes a description of the suspect materials in each building that were analyzed for asbestos and lead during this survey and a summary of the materials found to contain asbestos or lead. Estimates of the quantity of asbestos - containing materials (ACM) identified in each building are provided in Tables 1 and 2. Materials identified as positive for asbestos in Building 14 -06 include: joint compound, cement siding, tar patch on roofing vents, and built -up roofing materials. The only material identified as positive for asbestos in Hangar A was mastic beneath vinyl floor tiles. No materials were identified as positive for asbestos in Hangar B. Samples were not collected from fire doors located within the buildings. These doors should be assumed to contain asbestos. Lead - containing and lead -based paint were detected in each building in a variety of paints and locations. PCB - containing fluorescent light ballasts were identified in Building 14 -06, but not in Hangars A or B. However, some fluorescent lights in the hangars were inaccessible due to their height above the floor. Due to their apparent age the inaccessible light fixtures are expected to have PCB - containing ballasts. 21 -1- 09383 - 009- R1/WP/LKD 1 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE OF CONTENTS SHANNON &WILSON. INC. Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i ACRONYMS iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 1 2.1 Asbestos Survey Methods 1 2.2- Sampling Guidelines 2 2.3 Procedures and Analytical Methods 2 2.4 Historical Records Review And Former Surveys 3 2.5 Asbestos Survey 3 2.6 Survey Results 3 2.6.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 3 2.6.2 Hangar A 4 2.6.3 Hangar-B 5 3.0 LEAD -BASED PAINT SURVEY 5 3.1 Building 14 -06 5 3.2 Hangars A and B 5 4.0 PCB - CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS INVENTORIES 6 4.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 6 4.2 Hangar A 6 4.3 Hangar B 6 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 5.1 Asbestos - Containing Materials 7 5.2 Lead -Based Paint 8 5.3 PCB - Containing Light Ballasts 9 6.0 LIMITATIONS 9 21 -1- 09383 - 009- R1/WP /LKD 11 21 -1- 09383 -009 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) 21-1-09383-001-R1/WP/LKD 111 21-1-09383-009 ACM AHERA ASHARA Building 14 -06 CAB CFR EPA HEPA HGA HUD HVAC LBP LCP L &I mg/L mg/m3 MOF NVL NVLAP OSHA PACM PCBs PEL PLM PSAPCA PSCAA TCLP TSI WAC WISHA SHANNON FiWILSON, INC. ACRONYMS asbestos - containing materials Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act Boeing Building 14 -06 cement asbestos board Code of Federal Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency high efficiency particulate air homogeneous area Department of Housing and Urban Development heating ventilation and air conditioning lead -based paint lead - containing paint Labor and Industry milligrams per liter milligrams per cubic meter Museum of Flight NVL Laboratories, Inc National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Occupational Safety and Health Administration potential asbestos - containing material polychlorinated biphenyls . permissible exposure levels polarized light microscopy Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure thermal system insulation Washington Administrative Code Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration 21 -1- 09383 - 009- R1/WP/LKD iv 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. HAZARDOUS BUILDING MATERIALS SURVEY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION Shannon & Wilson completed a hazardous building materials survey of Boeing Building 14 -06 (Building 14 -06) located at 8700 East Marginal Way and Hangars A and B located on the property adjacent to the current Museum of Flight (MOF) location in Seattle, Washington (Figure 1). This survey work was performed on October 22 through 24, 2001. The buildings included in this survey consist of one two -story brick office building with an attached corrugated steel covered storage area, and two corrugated steel hangars. The work was accomplished in accordance with the scope of work included in our proposal. 2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY AND SAMPLING METHODOLOGY 2.1 Asbestos Survey Methods The asbestos survey consisted of a visual inspection of the buildings for suspect asbestos - containing material (ACM), manipulation of suspect ACM to determine friability, and sample collection and analysis. The survey was conducted to comply with the asbestos good -faith inspection requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 296 -62 -077 prior to demolition or renovation activities. A certified building inspector conducted the sampling. A training certificate is included in Appendix A. The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulation, 40 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 763, is the primary governing regulation for performing asbestos surveys. AHERA defines suspect ACM and specifies the minimum number of samples to be collected and analyzed. A total of 52 bulk asbestos samples were collected by Shannon & Wilson. The samples were submitted to NVL Laboratories, Inc. (NVL) and analyzed for asbestos by polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 600/R- 93/116. PLM quantifies asbestos concentrations between 1 and 100 percent. AHERA specifies that materials containing greater than 1 percent asbestos must be considered as 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 1 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON FJWILSON, INC. ACM. The analytical laboratory reports, which provide detailed layered analysis, are included in Appendix B. Asbestos sampling locations are depicted in Figures 2 through 6. 2.2 Sampling Guidelines The survey was conducted in accordance with the federal, state, and local regulations, which require the building owner to identify and dispose of ACM that may be encountered during demolition work. These regulations segregate suspect ACM into three categories: ► Surfacing Materials: ACM that is sprayed or troweled on surfaces (walls, ceilings, and structural membranes) for acoustical, decorative, or fireproofing purposes. This includes plaster and fireproofing insulation. ► Thermal System Insulation (TSI): Insulation used to inhibit heat transfer or prevent condensation on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other components of hot and cold water systems and heating ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. This includes pipe lagging; pipe wrap; block, batt, and blanket insulation; cements and "muds "; and a variety of other products. ► Miscellaneous Materials: Largely non - friable ACM products and materials not classified as surfacing materials or TSI. This includes floor tile, ceiling tile, roofing materials, and fabrics. 2.3 Procedures and Analytical Methods The AHERA regulation, 40 CFR Part 763, is the primary governing regulation for performing asbestos surveys. This regulation was originally enacted for school buildings, but has since been applied to public and commercial buildings by the Asbestos School Hazard Abatement Reauthorization Act (ASHARA) in 1994, and in 1995 by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker protection regulations, specifically 29 CFR 1926.1101(k) and in Washington, WAC 296 -62 -077. AHERA specifies the minimum number of samples to be Icollected and analyzed to prove that a suspect ACM is a non -ACM. AHERA specifies that only one positive analytical result necessitates designating a suspect material as ACM. All samples were submitted to NVL. NVL is accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), of the U.S. Department of Commerce. This accreditation does not constitute endorsement, but rather a finding of laboratory competence. As stated previously, samples were analyzed for asbestos using PLM with dispersion staining by EPA Method 600/R- 93/116. 21 -1- 09383 - 001- R1/WP /LKD 2 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. 2.4 Historical Records Review And Former Surveys Prior to performing the survey, information derived from a former asbestos survey report for Building 14 -06 was reviewed. The primary purpose of the review was to identify where ACM were likely to be present. Information pertaining to suspect and positive ACM locations within the building surveyed was obtained from a letter summarizing the results of a former asbestos survey report with the subject: Asbestos Goodfaith Survey for Building 14 -06 Job# G -1241 by Bill Whelan for Scott Darlington of Boeing Puget Sound Maintenance. Previous sample locations and the materials identified as positive for ACM during the former surveys, along with results of our visual inspection, are discussed below. 2.5 Asbestos Survey An inspection of the interiors and roofs of each of the buildings was completed to identify suspect ACM. A total of 34, 17, and 1 bulk samples were collected from Building 14 -06, Hangar A, and Hangar B, respectively. A total of 52 samples were analyzed for asbestos by 2.6.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 Building 14 -06 is a 16,000 - square -foot, brick, two -story building with an attached corrugated steel storage area. The building is currently vacant. The roof has flat and curved sections and is constructed of wood framing, wood decking, and asphalt. 21 -1- 09383 - 001- R1/WP/LKD 3 21 -1- 09383 -009 Of the samples analyzed, the following materials were found to be positive for ACM: cement siding on the roof with 35 percent chrysotile asbestos, and joint compound with 2 percent chrysotile asbestos. However, the wall system taken as a whole (wallboard and joint compound) contained less than 1 percent asbestos. Sample locations are shown on Figures 2 through 4, with the positive ACM locations designated in red. A summary of the materials sampled, the sample numbers, descriptions, results, and estimated amounts of confirmed ACM are presented in Table 1. 2.6.2 Hangar A Hangar A is a 18,000 - square -foot, corrugated metal building partitioned into five 3,600 square -foot hangars. Each hangar has a 230 - square -foot office space and restroom. The building is currently occupied and used as airplane storage for a variety of businesses. The roof of Hangar A was inaccessible, but appears to be angled and constructed of corrugated metal. ACM may be present on the roof in sealants, gaskets, or tar patch around roof vents. These materials may be located between sheets of corrugated metal and may not be encountered until demolition. These materials typically contain asbestos and should be sampled if encountered. Materials sampled included covebase and associated mastic, carpet mastic, wallboard and joint compound, and vinyl floor tiles. A total of 17 samples were collected from these materials in Hangar A. Of the samples analyzed, the only material found to be positive for ACM was vinyl floor . tile mastic with 3 percent chrysotile asbestos: Sample locations are shown on Figure 6, with the positive ACM locations designated in red. ,A summary of the materials sampled, the sample numbers, descriptions, results, and estimated amounts of confirmed ACM are presented in Table 2. 21-1-09383-001 -R1/WP/LKD 4 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON ENVILSON, INC. 2.6.3 Hangar B Hangar B is a 18,000 - square -foot, corrugated metal building partitioned into six 1,500- square -foot and two 1,050- square -foot hangars. The building is currently occupied and used as airplane storage for a variety of businesses. The roof of Hangar B was inaccessible, but appears to be angled and constructed of corrugated metal. ACM may be present on the roof in sealants, gaskets, or tar patch around roof vents. These materials may be located between sheets of corrugated metal and may not be encountered until demolition. These materials typically contain asbestos and should be sampled if encountered. The only PACM observed was caulking.along the exterior walls. One sample was The material sampled was not found to contain asbestos. 3.0 LEAD -BASED PAINT SURVEY Painted surfaces were surveyed in order to identify areas of homogeneous color, texture, and apparent age. One or more paint chip samples were collected from each homogeneous area (HGA) for testing. Samples were collected by scraping off a small paint chip (approximately 1 square inch) down to substrate with a sharp chisel. During the survey, a total of 20 paint chip samples were collected from Building 14 -06 and Hangars A and B. Each sample was analyzed for lead by EPA method 7420. Paint sample locations are shown in Figures 2 through 6. Analytical testing was performed by NVL. The results of the analyses are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. The complete analytical laboratory reports are included in Appendix A. 3.1 Building 14 -06 Thirteen paint chip samples were collected in Building 14 -06. Lead was found at concentrations exceeding the method detection limit in seven samples taken from the building (Table 3). The concentration of lead in the samples ranged from 0.01 to 0.31 percent. 3.2 Hangars A and B Hangars A and B are of similar construction materials and are treated here as a single building. Seven paint chip samples were collected in Hangars A and B. Lead was found at concentrations exceeding the method detection limit in three samples taken from the buildings (Table 4). The concentration of lead in the samples ranged from 0.92 to 1.5 percent. 21 -1-09383-001 -R 1 / W P/LKD 5 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. 4.0 PCB - CONTAINING LIGHT BALLASTS INVENTORIES As part of the hazardous building materials survey, fluorescent light fixtures were counted in each of the buildings. Most of the light fixtures were 4 feet long with four tubes per fixture. Others were 2 feet long and contained one or two tubes. Typically, each fixture has one ballast for each tube in a single tube fixture, or each pair of tubes in a multiple -tube fixture. 4.1 Boeing Building 14 -06 The approximate total number of fluorescent light fixtures in Building 14 -06 is 243 fixtures containing 774 light bulbs and 318 ballasts. The total number of ballasts is approximate since some fixtures were inaccessible. Many of the light fixtures were in operation and could not be safely dismantled to check the ballasts. Thus, only one fixture per room, approximately 20 percent of all the ballasts, were visually inspected to determine if they were labeled to indicate that they contain no PCBs. Fluorescent light ballasts manufactured before the late 1970s typically contain PCBs, and those manufactured after that time are usually labeled with "no PCBs." Of the 45 light fixtures inspected, only one was labeled "no PCBs. Based on the age of the buildings and the uniformity of the light fixtures encountered, it is expected that 312 ballasts contain PCBs. 4.2 Hangar A There are approximately 60 fluorescent light fixtures in Hangar A containing 240 light bulbs and 120 ballasts. The total number of ballasts is approximate since 10 of the 12 fixtures per hangar were inaccessible. Thus, only about 10 percent of all the ballasts were visually inspected to determine what they were labeled to indicate that they contain no PCBs. Of the light fixtures inspected, all were labeled "no PCBs." However, most of the inaccessible light fixtures appeared to be of an older style than those examined in the office portions of the hangars. The apparent age and size of bulb in the inaccessible fixtures indicates that they probably have PCB - containing ballasts. Thus, it is expected that 100 ballasts contain PCBs. 43 Hangar B There are approximately 34 fluorescent light fixtures in Hangar B containing 104 light bulbs and 68 ballasts. All of the fixtures in Hangar B were inaccessible. 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. However, based upon the size of tubes and style of fixtures, it is expected that the ballasts contain PCBs. Thus, it is expected that 68 ballasts contain PCBs. 5.0 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Asbestos - Containing Materials ACM is present in joint compound, tar patch on roof ducts, CAB siding, and built -up roofing materials in Building 14 -06, and flooring mastic in the office sections of Hangar A. No ACM was detected in Hangar B. We recommend that the tar patch, CAB siding, built -up roofing, and flooring mastic be removed prior to the demolition of the buildings in accordance with all local, state, and federal regulations. In addition, notification to the Washington State Department of Labor and Industry (L &I) and the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) is required prior to asbestos abatement. Materials that could not be sampled due to inaccessibility, structural barriers, or personnel safety reasons should be inspected during demolition. If suspect ACM is present, samples should be collected for laboratory analysis to confirm asbestos content prior to removal. This may result in cost savings if the materials are not asbestos containing. Fire doors were not inspected during this survey and should be assumed to contain asbestos. Since the wall system in Building 14 -06 (wallboard and joint compound) contains less than 1 percent asbestos as a composite, Washington Industrial Safety and Health Administration (WISHA) Regional Directive 23.30 states that work involving the handling of the dry wall is not considered an asbestos project as defined in WAC 296 -65 -003. Under this provision, notification to the Washington Department of L &I and PSCAA is not required for projects involving only the drywall assuming certain requirements are met. These requirements include the use of wet, non - aggressive methods, prompt clean -up, and the use of high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtered vacuums, as well as asbestos awareness and hands -on training as prescribed in WAC 296 -62- 07722(5) for workers, and supervision by a competent person as defined in WAC 296 -62- 07703. Respiratory protection may also be required based on overall dust levels. All building maintenance personnel, contractors, and any other person who may disturb the ACM should be notified of the contents of this report and trained in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 prior to disturbing the ACM. 21 -1- 09383 - 001- R1/WP /LKD 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. 5.2 Lead -Based Paint Lead- containing paint (LCP) was detected throughout the interior of Building 14 -06, while LCP and lead -based paint (LBP) were detected throughout Hangars A and B. LBP is defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the LBP Poisoning Act to be paint containing greater than 0.5 percent lead. Renovation or demolition of materials containing lead presents concerns regarding both worker safety and health, and the regulatory status of any building materials requiring disposal. The mere presence of LCP can itself raise concerns under certain circumstances as specific businesses, such as child care facilities, are subject to strenuous lead - containing paint standards. According to OSHA guidelines, if lead is detected, it is present and must be handled in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. No simple relationship exists, between the concentration of lead in paint and potential worker exposure if lead becomes airborne. Therefore, if lead is present and is disturbed during renovation or demolition activities, an evaluation must be made whether or not workers are exposed to concentrations in air in excess of the action level of 0.03 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). If the action level is exceeded, requirements for training, medical monitoring, and air sampling are triggered. If the permissible exposure levels (PEL) of 0.05 mg/m3 is exceeded, more requirements must be met, including use of respiratory protection equipment. Additional information pertaining to worker safety and health is available in WAC 296 - 155 -176, WAC 296 -62, Part E — Respiratory Protection, and WAC 296 -62, Part H — Air Contaminants. OSHA guidelines are presented in 29 CFR 1926.62. If building materials containing lead are to be removed and disposed of, requirements for disposal must be met. Specifically, the dangerous waste criteria for lead is 5.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L) measured by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). If treated as a separate waste, it is possible that materials containing high concentrations of LBP would exceed the dangerous waste criteria. However, when these materials are combined with other building debris that does not contain significant amounts of lead in the overall waste stream, it is likely that the combined waste stream would not fail the TCLP criteria and would not require designation as a dangerous waste. Requirements for proper disposal of waste building materials (including sampling and testing) are specified in WAC 173 -303 and 40 CFR 261. 21 -1- 09383- 001- R1/WP/LKD 8 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. 5.3 PCB- Containing Light Ballasts We recommend that the asbestos abatement contractor be tasked to remove fluorescent light ballasts presumed to contain PCBs. During removal activities, each ballast can be inspected for PCBs and properly disposed. These materials require special handling practices for which the abatement contractor should be equipped. 6.0 LIMITATIONS A good -faith effort has been made to identify ACM in or on the buildings prior to demolition. Shannon & Wilson performed destructive sampling where feasible and within its limitation as a consultant. Construction methods and materials use varies with contractors and construction trades, and suspect ACM may exist in non - typical locations that we have not investigated. During the demolition process, care should be taken that additional suspect materials, if present, are not disturbed without following the appropriate regulatory requirements. Where suspect materials are encountered, they should be assumed to be ACM until shown to be negative for asbestos through laboratory analysis. If laboratory analysis is not performed, all suspect materials should be assumed to contain ACM. Shannon & Wilson performed this sampling consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by professionals currently practicing under similar conditions in the industry. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of The Seneca Group and its representatives. The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are based on conditions encountered at the time of our study and on our experience and judgment. Shannon & Wilson cannot be held responsible for the interpretation by others of the data contained in this report. The information presented in Appendix E, "Important Information About Your Environmental Report," is provided to assist in understanding the use and limitations of our reports. SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Cody M. nson, Engineer AHERA Building Inspector Certificate #997048 CMJ:SWG /cmj 21 -1 -09383 -001- R1/WP/LKD Scott aul Associate AHERA Building Inspector Certificate #999640 AHERA Project Designer Certificate #999712 9 21 -1- 09383 -009 ■����� (����`� � TABLE 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ASBESTOS SAMPLES BUILDING 14-06 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. 214-09383-00 0W01-Q1 2 - 1 Wall System ' Wallboard Joint Compound Negative Negative Positive <1% ND 2% Yes 31,600 SF CBO1-01 ' 2-2 White covebase and mastic Negative CTU1-01 2-3 2' x 4' off-white wormhole ceiling tile Negative CTO2 - 01 2-4 2' x 4' white wormhole ceiling tile Negative CTO3 - 01 2-6 2'x4'white Iarger wormhole ceiling tile Negative S\8}1-01 2 - 6 White with speckles sheet vinyl Negative DWO2 - 01 2-7 Partition wall / drywall Negative MA8O1'01 2 - 8 Carpet Mastic Negative CBO1-02 3-8 White covebase and mastic Negative K8ASO1 -02 - - 2 - 10 Carpet mastic Negative FOR01-01 2-11 Formica Countertop Negative OVVU1 - 03 2- 12 Drywall Negative CTO4 - 01 2-13 Glue-on ceiling tile Negative ' yWAS01-03 2-14 Carpet mastic Negative DWO1'04 2-15 Wall System Wallboard . Joint Compound Negative Negative Positive <196 ND 2% Yes 31,600 SF OVVO1 - 05 2- 16 Drywall Negative VFTO1-01 2-17 12"x12" beige vinyl floor tile Negative CBO1'03 2-18 White covebase and mastic Negative K4ASO1-04 2-18 Carpet mastic Negative VVP01-01 2 - 20 Window putty on western extemal windows Negative TBO1-01 2-21 Tack board Negative C|BO2-01 3-1 Off-white covebase and mastic Negative 214-09383-00 • TABLE 1 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR ASBESTOS SAMPLES BUILDING 14-06 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. ;?If. eiVIV - 44 Identifaltiii rT-A.,mrtitltp,gl.4;i:r..,:z:-- ' SAnpre,L Sample4RescrAption A 4 c 5. A al Ical!Resilt ikf i_-'fz--.rA.'...wi,s-ae.Arzizt6,Vvt,AT,.., ih ,1(peCebt) ---421e. FiTa3161 A -,,-A, .,i ff - iaiii‘. ili i Quattity {.71W.AV-•-:---a1A11,ah DWO1 - 06 3 - 2 Drywall Negative CTO2 - 02 3 - 3 2' x 4' white wormhole ceiling tile Negative MAS01 - 05 . 3 - 4 Carpet Mastic Negative DWO1 - 02 3 - 5 Drywall Negative DWO1 - 07 3 - 6 Drywall Negative RM01 - 01 4- 1 Upper layer of roofing material Positive per previous survey Unknown No 15,600 SF RM02 - 01 4 - 1 Bottom layer of roofing material Positive per previous survey Unknown No 15,600 SF CABO1 - 01 4 - 2 Siding on roof Positive 35% No 500 SF TRPO1 - 01 4 - 2 Tar paper under siding Negative CLKO1 - 01 _.', 4 - 3 Seam caulk on walls Negative TP01 - 01 4 - 4 Tar patch on venting Positive per previous survey Unknown No 100 SF TP02 - 01 4 - 5 Tar patch around roof seams Negative Notes: ND = Non-detect LF = Linear feet SF = Square feet 21-1-09383-009 ' TABLE 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR PAINT SAMPLES BUILDING 14-06 SHANNON & WILSON INC. ‘,.,2,,:i• , , _., 't, :.:: i , , ,,,,,=,=::, fiZ 4: , '.::';,..i.., . l 010 ;We 0 ti f i 4 atI bt t ::'_t.,':•;..:, :.: --::...--_,••,::.--...-;1.....,.::,„ 1 -4 : I.: ;. . : -,°, = n :* 'r 4, : .. ricure,# 1 '..', :::.-i-:`.. „:f : ": s +,,y, .",-' '.- .. . 's r Bample:DescriPtici i:. ::-: :;.::, ''..".: ...: .„ ,..,....`',' ,:` .% : S'. '-'...:.:::...: ' ..::.`... : :MO ltkOrget 4 Ma : i 6gliCarj-;..L:r.Vi -A13417.t'ailtk'tt LBP - 01 4 Gray paint on roof ventilation system 230 < 0.023 LBP - 02 4 White / off-white paint on cinderblocks on roof < 160 < 0.016 LBP - 03 • 4 Paint on metal covering on roof 3100 0.31 LBP - 04 4 Paint on wood panneling on roof 100 0.01 LBP - 05 3 White wall paint in stairwell < 270 < 0.027 LBP - 06 3 White wall paint on 2nd floor < 84 < 0.0084 LBP - 07 3 Brown paint on 2nd floor door frames 400 0.04 LBP - 08 2 White wall paint 1st floor < 190 < 0.019 LBP - 09 2 Brown paint on 1st floor door frames < 150 < 0.015 LBP - 10 _ 2 White paint from cinderblocks 210 0.021 LBP - 11 2 Paint from metal shed walls 1100 0.11 LBP - 12 2 Paint on exterior cinderblocks 290 0.029 LBP - 13 2 Gray paint around exterior fire door 110 0.011 Notes: mg/kg = milligram per kilogram 21-1-09383-009 TABLE 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR PAINT SAMPLES HANGARSAANDB SHANNON & WILSON INC. , ., ampletldentificabon. -'140.FA, ' -. - ,..;:n4Pr-z-Z-t-le '0.-., - . ' -s-F. -=,..a-t,, 4.tr-,- •, — Y ''', A.:.-, , ‘.4,- • "•,.. . :%..-kzimg/kg ., , 4 ' Iraillt,ica,1:.Rffelljtal. - ?. I.Perl_Ce.n., ' A - LBP - 01 5 Green paint from hangar beams 15,000 1.5 A - LBP - 02 5 White paint from office interior < 77 < 0.0077 A - LBP - 03 ' 5 White paint from office interior < 160 < 0.016 A - LBP - 04 5 White paint from doors and frames < 630 < 0.063 A - LBP - 05 5 Paint of floor in hangar < 200 < 0.02 B - LBP - 01 6 Paint from hangar walls 11,000 1.1 B - LBP - 02 6 Lime green paint on exterior doors 9,200 i 0.92 Notes: mg/kg = milligiam per kilogram 21-1-09383-009 CC -J 0 S CLOVERDALE > 5 4.0 mirTio •'- S HI -,,, 4•4411PJ.E:•jr!-' r;: N. . '‘'. ----PLANT-77-, . .. ,.. . 1-. I RD ... Z a. ST CV , ••• - at .. • - i. 4 DO VA 1200 sr ›. ,, 0111 ORP 6 loco = ...-Th S TREN^ T _ .._ S CON NE!DERSON . -. 32 cv - ..._ ST sT • .T .1.f. . \ , !•.-,' :, , -., , • t -•+: \V. --...,, .. '.. % ..-. .. ,,. .; 34 r4; =cr M 500 v' sl S DIRECTO 5 DI ECTOR ..„-- ( , •,:-.:;;`,' ST • -,... %, 5 4 ..c S BE ilitl ,_ s- 91 • r; -1—i--+-/- S BARTON SI rc:7. _ ,.._....,...- . ---. *.- At/ r. x •44, i . LOCATION V. 1, • s- ;iv p. .. * I, :, kt, ■ ST 11 -1r S 93RO ST 44( 95TH ST St; g s 800 $ 0 71.1—V. T•4, $ - ST 1,- s ' 99TH si ■<• IN R1,7 if 120 0 s e LaC m0tin <6 \ I . P — •= 4N 4 ,4r- .Ci - VI i s 5. it \ V1 4 .4 11D‘k- 41i 1 •%\ --- - , . .. ., • . • . . • . - .T S 1137k. ST A .... s 114M ' S . 115D4 ... ' X • ” ST 1 ... ... - H02D 5•11— I--VO ,, ITh t ., -• e . a A 1,"S .2' ‘ 1 0.:''0 ,< .2 ' , x 0 1 4 4 O i ?1T • ST 45>lt S0-1O-a ya .`0" C ' , (4 2 _ t • 4 S ST d T o < -TOTH ST s't r._ CLEW 'ACgtS•.'E ,„--- ,„ . SiS S1O3RO 5 ' • S I -i t"1 ..S P_1,21 `;,i •;Le.';'•fi".•:7!•il• 1.'ceA:,;x1-ia-i.. S 107TH s •L S ... .c S 1127 p 2 ‹ i ST _ _ 1 i c.t-:.-'f'.lG2 ;tf it:"..i7"r 3 l. fr- .::.-:, ,.4l-• . ::..1'-1'1, „-- , k. : t a .t... :.'i:-...,,..,--,4 t:courip 3.2111 "...?1,--.1 !.: •: • :—..-s-.....:-7.:- '''' /1. v) 116TH . ST. v; _ S _s--- :1 i114141 A t 1115TH _ 6 ST ----v)-ST--;-' , , ,..• icri - — .-• ri,..- -116TH . !. . . y...1, . %t.1.1..,.TTH.: V..• :' • vc§ -cr r 12 .-:: -x TH . < 509 ST tn co 00 AY c 1 H I ":"1 120TH ST = 4 LAKE t- ARK in ::.4,9,- _1221.4 1. L S _ ... 1 0 S -, 24TH 7 1 00 F $ ..i.,: , ' -- - , . e'tki4I,, 1.. no'),,^5., ' • .....toc ....60t 1111.11.1.1111 , 0 1/4 1/2 Scale in Miles NOTE Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. It is unlawful to copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or November 2001 21-1-09383-009 resale, without permission. All rights reserved. . SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 1 Geotectmical and Environmental Consultants Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington VICINITY MAP Date: 11-16-2001 a"m^:ue Down LBP-05 LBP-07 LBP-06 ey 5 LEGEND Fire Door 1. 17 • LBP-1 • 0 20 40 Scale in Feet ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos-Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead-Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location To Roof Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14-06 2ND FLOOR SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21-1-09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 3 Geotechnlcal and Environmental C.oneultenta certificate of (omptetton TWO 1.0 to certify tbat Scott Gaulke ba0 gatigfacturiCp cornpCeteb one bap of refre5ber training a0 a Project Designer to comply tuitij tYje training requiremento of Tap(ER Effie 13 / 40 CIA. 763 ( g .a) 4.- A • RA Cer stration ed: M09907012 Certificate Number 999712 ARGUS vw SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE n Aug 16, 2001 Date(s) of Training Expiration Date: Aug 16, 2002 Argus Pacific, Inc. • 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 J QCertifttate of Comptetton i5 to certify that Scott Gaulke ba5 5atigacturiip compCeteb 4 bourt of refregber training a4 an Asbestos Building Inspector to comply tuiti trje training requiretneutO of XQZI Titre J3J / 40 Qjf. 763 (ERR) Tr. g Ad '�� istration AHERA Certifi - d: M09907012 Certificate Number 999640 -0 ® T SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE n ARGUS Aug 8, 2001 Date(s) of Training Expiration Date: Aug 8, 2002 Argus Pacific, Inc. • 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 Qertittcate of 'Comptetton Zbi5 1.5 to certifp tbat Cody Johnson ba5 5ati5factoriYp compteteb 24 bour5 of training ag arr Asbestos Building Inspector to com *rp tvitb the training requiremento of 2MQER Title 11 / 40 CIA. 763 ( Q3R.R) f G A4/1/ Trainin AdministraAHERA Certified: M09907012 Certificate Number 997048 ARGUS SAFETY • TRAINING • INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE n Expiration Date: Jan 5, 2002 Jana- 5,2001 Date(s) of Training Argus Pacific, Inc. • 1900 W. Nickerson, Suite 315 • Seattle, Washington • 98119 • (206) 285.3373 • fax (206) 285.3927 i SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. APPENDIX B LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS 21 -1- 09383 -009 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 AIHA ELLAP #101861 ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attention: Cody Johnson Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Batch#:21- 11882.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 23, 2001 Date Reported: October 29, 2001 Total samples: 13 Sample # Lab ID Sample LoD in Results in Results in Wt.(g) mg/kg mg/kg Percent LBP -01 21106065 .11880 110 230 0.0230 LBP -02 21106066 .08540 160 <160 <0.0160 LBP -03 21106067 .05010 270 3100 0.3100 LBP -04 21106068 .22380 60 100 0.0100 LBP -05 21106069 .05000 270 <270 <0.0270 LBP -06 21106070 .16130 84 <84 <0.0084 LBP -07 21106071 .06630 200 400 0.0400 LBP -08 21106072 .07280 190 <190 <0.0190 LBP -09 21106073 .09000 150 <150 <0.0150 LBP -10 21106074 .06360 210 210 0.0210 LBP -11 21106075 .16760 81 1100 0.1100 LBP -12 21106076 .23060 59 290 0.0290 (Results continued on next page) Instrument /Bench Run: 21102910 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram Lo = Limit of Detection '<' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Reviewed by: a, / Nick IT!" ical Direc�� Date Analyzed: October 29, 2001 Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 AIHA ELLAP #101861 ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attention: Cody Johnson Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Batch#:21- 11882.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 23, 2001 Date Reported: October 29, 2001 Total samples: 13 Sample # Lab ID Sample Wt.(g) LoD in mg/kg Results in Results in mg/kg Percent LBP -13 (Continued from previous page) 21106077 .12080 110 Method Blank <54.00mg /kg Post Digestion Matrix Spike: 102% Instrument /Bench Run: 21102910 110 0.0110 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram LoD = Limit of Detection ' <' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Date Analyzed: October 29, 2001 Reviewed by: Page 2 — — • c #�iCt N v1- � Page _of Laboratory N V �-- Attn - Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Descriptlok (include preservative if used) =III SHANNON aWMLSON. INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louts, MO 63141 (206) 632-8020 (314) 872-8170 (206) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax 2055 H@ Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479-0600 (907) 479-5691 Fax Sample Identity 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Anchorage, AK 99518 • (907) 561-2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 303 Weltsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946 -6309 (509) 946-6580 Fax Date Sampled Time c V 'V CASo\ - ok 1 1012.310l . ?` , 1 OPn1 -a1 i�1f2-b)&I /� �. al \L o t- 01 luIti3]c) N T 1 I V FTo \- of i0 /a1e\ - L >3 P- o 1 - it x12.01 ?C I LaP -k3L L d?' 03 aP -,3 y . L4P,ps % C >< l l •w a�tf +i14 -'9:t -°1 Project''In�x?tl 1,< "b' dt #.,�• �r k t�1 Signature: 1 ^�dt.�e ny+ ;� Rellqu'f}sied' x't' Time: (`J5� ? - -` '� q Signature: Time: R -w N:+1:.1 vim. �' :,y �.y; -.. * �e i ti , Signature: Time: Project Numbed- t- (- 853153-.. 9 Total Number of Containers ^ �� Project Name: ;410 ,,�ti,.,,7,,� COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed atfie: Date: r U Z3 G'1 Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: G o• L -54kHsc. Received Good Cond. /Cold C4. (-� Ongoing Project? Yes • No p Delivery Method: - (attach shipping bill, if any) pany> , ) v t'�' Company: • Company: Sampler: GA,\� i . }^.! ;:;0i 44.44$ . �- a - i 7 � 1� " Q q 44 e � .� _x qA'. `v : `- ..x - ' l:t��Y••c .e.�fL z : ?i N..` ` *-Tts 146 t .r ' - . :c ' w. *. ,itas id :t. � ^: t A y ' R G.. . �i- .. 1 i' •t �3� .r ; :ir r,.b. .; `*' 41'., �C,Over . " - �v ;:•_ .ic'.. Requested Turnaround lime: S - - Signature: Time ,::!,..,c Signature: Time: Signature: Time: Special Instructions: S 6 ( 'S Pa �tv2 rk 1 ' S-e. ii-t � `'— Printed Name: Date: Ad /oak; h 7r7ia'%lt iff Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: 71i14-i Company: company: F- 19.91/UR 1 Am "' SHANNON 6VVILSON, INC. i• Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632-8020 (206) 695 -6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479-0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax Sample Identity 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872-8170 (314) 872 -8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946 -6309 (509) 946 -6580 Fax Date Sampled Time Laboratory Attn. N Jt_ Page -± of S Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) L P - 0 7 .,/:�51; -`: ` LPD P - off i • 1 1 - ... I I0P -jO 1 • I.- '3 P -11 i 1 1 :' t 1 , iomati Pro ect nfr on ^,,:. ' :Sam Ie;Recei t : `= Relin wished By: 1.` ,,) :Reiin Wshed B 2. `. •.Relinquished By: 3. Project Number :? t (u(, A z,-c�5 Total Number of Containers Signature: , `, - Time: 1�j� 1 g Signature: Time: Signature: Time: , � '' Project Name: 44 �,F E. ;10tir 1.17" COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Dater • ,. i ? . i. i Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: t Contact: C. ,,.P,y " \i_. lAVI O—, Received Good Cond. /Cold i) l_ 1� Ongoing Project?' Yes • No,i . Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: , _ ' 4 l Company: Company: Sampler: C rl� Instructions `f? f R ce�ivia'By: = 1:= Signature: •- -�- Time: ert� :(,2 �!� °Received' By _ 2. Signature: Time: Received By ' 3. Signature: Time: Requested Turnaround Time: '�,� �, � , j �.�;� _..-�; 1 —� — _ = Special Instructions: .(y'.7: . Printed Name: . Date: /Via)/ Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: . I %'rr7t ;w5- Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannnn R Wilnnn - .tnh Filw Company: ,1.r 1-6._- Company: Company: F-19 -91/UR NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 AIHA ELLAP #101861 ANALYSIS REPORT Total Lead (Pb) Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attention: Cody Johnson Project #: 21 -1- 09323 -009 Location: MOF Expansion Batch#:21- 11909.00 Matrix: Paint Chip Method: EPA 7420 Date Received: October 24, 2001 • Date Reported: October 31, 2001 Total samples: 7 Sample # Lab ID Sample Wt.(g) LoD in Results in Results in mg/kg mg/kg Percent A- LBP -01 A- LBP -02 A- LBP -03 A- LBP -04 A- LBP -05 B- LBP -01 B- LBP -02 21106367 21106368 21106369 21106370 21106371 21106372 21106373 Method Blank <54.00mg /kg Instrument /Bench Run: 21103104 .16800 . 17450 . 08680 .02130 .06880 .25470 .10270 80 77 160 630 200 53 130 15000 1.5000 <77 <0.0077 <160 <0.0160 <630 <0.0630 <200 <0.0200 11000 1.1000 9200 0.9200 mg /kg = Milligrams per kilogram LoD = Limit of Detection ' <' = Below the detection limit NOTES: All standard and spike values are reported for quality control purposes. Results for QC samples represent Percent Recovery. Analyst: Cheston Perry Reviewed by: Date Analyzed: October 31, 2001 Page 1 i "m"' SHANNON & WILSON, INC. � Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632 -8020 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks. AK 99709 (907) 479 -0600 Sample Identity • 11500 Olive Blvd.. Suite 276 St. Louis. MO 63141 (314) 872-8170 5430 Fairbanks Street. Suite 3 Anchorage. AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 Lab No. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland. WA 99352 (509) 946-6309 Time Date Sampled Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative If used) Page 1 of — Laboratory ,jvi Attn: G g' l5 o` G C o Remarks/Matrix A - LNP - U\ l,;(7.tip k l A- L_P,P -c) A- L.6P -oLi _ A - LC P- 0S 1 'i.' -L'3P-o( Project Information ,' ' , Sample Receipt Relinquished By 1 Relinqu shed. By: 2. " ' Relinquished By .,3.. Project Number: I 7.1. t - t1�3L3 —�.�`t Total Number of Containers Signature: Time: Signature: Time: Signature: Time: r �'.. 1- ��— `� Project Name: mo F. E. ' ^ COC Seals /Intact? Y/N/NA Printed Name: Date: / .. •,.4/ ,. i Printed Name: Date: Pnnted Name: Date: Contact: rp1 -7--) P'" JX JL.�S.7.. Received Good Cond. /Cold I , A Ongoing Project ?7 Yes • No `(;I Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill. if any) Company: / S k, `^) Company Company: Sampler: (� - instructions Recc ed By 1. " Received By , .., :2... . Recelved.By: �. Requested Turn Around Time: ' Jro., . w Signature: Time: /hd :30 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: v' Special Instructions: -`-- PnFme: Date: O Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: G ./mi. G/sS Company: L �2�. �'1' Company: Company: Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon 8 Wilson w/ Laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files in - 5nannon tS wuson - Joo rue -1 Q -Q 1 n I R FAX 206. 634.1936 E -MAIL info@nvilabs.com www.nvIlabs.com October 29, 2001 Cody Johnson Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis; NVL Batch # 21- 11885.00 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed please find test results for the bulk samples submitted to our Laboratories for analysis. Examination of these samples was conducted for the presence of identifiable asbestos fibers using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance to U.S. EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Test Method. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the report will include findings for each layer (labeled LAYER 1 and LAYER 2, etc. for each individual layer). The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by visual estimation. For those samples with asbestos concentrations between 1 and 10 percent based on visual estimation, the EPA recommends a procedure known as point counting (NESHAPS, 40 CFR Part 61). Point counting is a statistically more accurate means of quantification for samples with low concentrations of asbestos. If you would like us to further refine the concentration estimates of asbestos in these samples using point counting, please let me know. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please feel free to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, i Ale ''ce `j li 11111b. /;� y ical Director Enc.: Sample Results NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106083 Client Sample #: CAB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray cementitious material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 7% ASBESTOS TYPE: Chrysotile NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cement /binder PERCENT 35% Lab ID #: 21106084 Client Sample #: WP01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Tan brittle material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106085 Client Sample #: CLK01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: White /brown soft material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10 /29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 'ice' Nick��, chnica� - or Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20% 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106086 Client Sample #: VFT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan vinyl tile, LAYER 2: Black mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 3% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder, Granules LAYER 2: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND ND Lab ID #: 21106087 Client Sample #: MAS01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106088 Client Sample #: MAS01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) .NL ''���' ca cector Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All b mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%=>0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15%, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 30 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106089 Client Sample #: MAS01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106090 Client Sample #: MAS01 -04 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106091 Client Sample #: MAS01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 4 %, Synthetic fiber 5% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with thefollowing measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20%= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. 44MiL—kbalSrr4.55°7 Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106092 Client Sample #: RM01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10 %, Glass fibers 17% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106093 Client Sample #: RM02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Black asphaltic material, LAYER 2: Tan paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 7 %, Glass fibers 15% LAYER 1: Asphalt /binder LAYER 2: Cellulose 80% LAYER 2: Binder & filler ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106094 Client Sample #: TP01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10% Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Wei Long Tai Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 • NVLAP- #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106095 Client Sample #: TP02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 10% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106096 Client Sample #: Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Black fibrous asphaltic material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 30 %, Glass fibers 17% TRP01 -01 ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Asphalt /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106097 Client Sample #: CT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 55 %, Glass fibers 20% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint PERCENT ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 ■ l Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate "4. ' pies are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%=>0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%=5-15%, 20%=10-30%, 50%= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106098 Client Sample #: CT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 65% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106099 Client Sample #: CT02 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 65% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106100 Client Sample #: CT03 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Gray fibrous material with white paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 55 %, Glass fibers 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Binder & filler, Paint ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 N'echnica Or Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported 9'o Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3%, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20%= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 6 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106101 Client Sample #: CT04 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan fibrous material with white paint, LAYER 2: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 70% LAYER 2: Cellulose 3% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106102 Client Sample #: CB01 -0J. Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: ; PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106103 Client Sample #: CB01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Wei Long Tai Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Nick'L L % % / %/__ ice,• i� a ._l Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0 -3%, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 7 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106104 Client Sample #: CB01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic, LAYER 3: Tan chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% LAYER 2: Mastic /binder LAYER 3: Cellulose 25% LAYER 3: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106105 Client Sample #: CB02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Tan flat rubbery material, LAYER 2: Yellow /brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 1% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) 1 Sampled by: Client v��' Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 /� ��r� Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 N ,:ffa cto • Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separate1 1tbuticsaffip es are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5%=>1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 200= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US. Government. Page 8 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number. 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106106 Client Sample #: TB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White woven fibrous material with white soft material, LAYER 2: Tan fibrous material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 55% LAYER 2: Cellulose 70% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Binder & filler ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106107 Client Sample #: DW01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: Chrysotile 2% LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sample comments: Composite result for whole sample equals <1% Asbestos Lab ID #: 21106108 Client Sample #: DW01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 20 %, Glass fibers 5% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Ni Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. --iclibtaa. pies are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %=>1- 9 %,10% 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US. Government. Page 9 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106109 Client Sample #: DW01 -03 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint and white woven fibrous material, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5 %, Glass fibers 10% LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106110 Client Sample #: DW01 -04 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: Chrysotile 2% LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sample comments: Composite result for whole sample equals <1% Asbestos (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in hill, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US. Government. Page 10 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLA -P #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106111 Client Sample #: DW01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106112 Client Sample #: DW01 -06 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White powdery material with paint, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 5% LAYER 1: Binder & filler, Paint LAYER 2: Cellulose 25% LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder ASBESTOS TYPE :. PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106113 Client Sample #: DW01 -07 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White soft material, LAYER 2: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 4% LAYER 2: Cellulose 27% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) r Sampled by: Client . Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 % _ Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 7` i•echnicai% ctor Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. Alilli mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0 -3%, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15%, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. 1 Page 11 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ND ND Lab ID #: 21106114 Client Sample #: DW02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Yellow mastic, LAYER 2: White soft material, LAYER 3: White chalky material with paper OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 3% LAYER 2: Cellulose 4% LAYER 3: Cellulose 27% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler LAYER 3: Binder & filler, Gypsum /binder PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106115 Client Sample #: SV01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White sheet vinyl, LAYER 2: Gray fibrous material with yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 65% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Vinyl /binder LAYER 2: Binder & filler, Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 N. -�^ ' 'cal II .r l Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. . " amples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0-3%, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20%=10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 12 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11885.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 34 Lab ID #: 21106116 Client Sample #: FOR01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White /brown brittle material, LAYER 2: Red mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 70% LAYER 2: Cellulose 5% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Binder & filler LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Wei Long Tai Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed sepa?atelyrAlY'mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 13 — C =11 SHANNON FIWILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632 -8020 (206) 695 -6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax Sample Identity 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872-8170 (314) 872 -8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 3 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946-6309 (509) 946 -6580 Fax Date Sampled Time Laboratory Attn. Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) O° cCs t 0n��' Remarks Matrix C. v• 01 - c-N 1 h1 r ! X- rte_ t, -) t )1- -) Z I<�j�2.f ,1 c' 1 I n v,) J \ - v 1,11 Z.Li L 1 '` C,,,1 U 1- 05 -- ; !,1 r;,; , CJ.3 0'r -o7 1il1u ,6l ;_ V),,,)02-o‘ , , i?.14y! mil, -) \% C) t - 0 1 i.t.jO: j. 1ji.-Liv; Project Information; ,: �'_ �fx,Sampie:Receipt,_: ;::Relinquished By ?.:':1: Relinquished By =2:`,: Relinquished By 3. Project Number: �,1- 1- oct?,g3 -a0'� Total Number of Containers Signature: �� , lime: (� S3 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: - `" �r�' l"' -- Project Name:AAD C, ric.. -�•a— COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Nam§: Date: 1%1! :. ',./- i Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: (,.. L .. —..),,,C, v, a ,--, Received Good Cond. /Cold _ `- " - 1; ' " s Ongoing Project? Yes • No ■ Delivery Method: ry (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: :' > i. r... ,. , ;. L �.- Company: Company: Sampler: ( ':^ -T nstructions .:; .Recceehted,By: 1 : Signature: / Time: !47,:) Received BY: ,,, : 2:.:. Signature: Time: ' : -: Received .By: 3.. • Signature: Time: Requested Turnaround Time: -3 4 ,,, ^ c.p ,, LI �_� � " —' `�"`- Special Instructions: `a .� c) V S._‘' p , �c „ v \ ' 1 `� S' } I ;-i'i, e). Printed Name: Date: u -,;1?-41 Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: % /Tt'j2 /,:.5 Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: /✓ f,L.• Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR 1■T.. -I 1 SHANNON WILSON. INC. ow Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632 -8020 (206) 695-6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479-0600 (907) 479-5691 Fax Sample Identity 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872-8170 (314) 872-8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561-4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946 -6309 (509) 946-6580 Fax Date Sampled Time Laboratory rJ V (- Attn• Page % of Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) G° �o o� Remarks /Matrix F- 19 -91/UR No. r--r07-ot i 1 1 1 1 G i c) j -U Z • J, 1 - C..7 o1.4 -oI 1 1 (..Ci c, (- v l ..... i f 1 r 13(.)%. -,).Z , i t ..UZ--V1 , i 1 i ,i . ( (.1 t .), •. ,■; 4' ' Project Information ;' ;, : Sample -Receipt : : - - Relinquished By 1: }.,;, Relinquishe i„By ; '2::;. .' ;'Relinquished By . 3. Project Number ? t O h 57.!r:_.-11 Total Number of Containers Signature: Time: l -, i t) Signature: Time: Signature: Time: Project Name: Al .)e >' -. 0,..., -- COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date: = Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: : ,, - . -, c.•i. - • ..r■ Received Good Cond. /Cold f, -• Project? Ongoing Project? Yes • No m Delivery Method: (attach shipping bill, if any) Company:; .a 1'`'`'} Company: Company: Sampler: 1- / ✓1 -.:). ' $ Instructions A; ,_ Received) B 1 ; Rec'eived B ' ' Y2 { ,.Received B 3. Requested Turnaround Time: Signature:' _ - Time: 3; CO Signature: Time: Signature: Time: 7-7-, Special Instructions: `-) >i ur `, J i ,3 ∎- 1 ) S S. J < t ^ ' Printed Name: - Date: i�, / ,N/ Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: / • -; j J Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon & Wilson - Job File Company: ; ii(.!i -,-- Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No. =11 SHANNON 6VVILSON. INC. NMI Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632 -8020 (206) 695 -6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax Sample Identity 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872-8170 (314) 872-8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946-6309 (509) 946-6580 Fax Date Sampled Time Laboratory Attn. Page Nv! _ J of S_ Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) h"RemarksfMatrix Mdk- 01 i4aajn 1 ,y - - MA01- 2 1 1 , ,YI A- 01- u 3 Nri I t 2h,ol -V` 1.. 1 1 - >;r..)1_JI ! I .1- (Z.Q O1. O 1 << y \ri Project Information' °:_ ` : ;- ' °Sample Receipt.: : s. Relinquished By ` .1..; ::. Relinquished By 2. Relinquished By 3. Project Number: 2 t • r • or-1 IC i -(4-6 Total Number of Containers Signature: n Time: 1 "D';'...) Signature: Time: Signature: Time: "k' ' Project Name: ftl3F Ed- p,.,,.,.;..- COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date: ;,�rl. "�ir, Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: t Contact: ( •., -t •'S-" ..-_,,,,kev.^5,-,--N Received Good Cond. /Cold -- �-" a'. `r .' �. ,i !,, - -� 7 Ongoing Project? Yes • No Delivery Method: ry (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: ! c %.,,..) Company: Company: Sampler: i =111 SHANNON •V11ILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632-8020 (206) 695 -6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479-0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax Sample Identity 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872 -8170 (314) 872 -8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946 -6309 (509) 946-6580 Fax Date Sampled Time Page i..1- of .3 Laboratory PU i % ! -- Attn Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) Remarks /Matrix F- 19 -91/UR No. ton 1" el I - o t .: ii. ,, lc, l - .7-- V i ti l- U) ti,/'•iI... • i r t. - (\ Q •- - ? i ( ,%`�. .jam ' L \)( 0 - ; 1 -- () - (,(. . Project Information ' ::'Sample Receipt ;':, '° .: Relinquished By 1: ;: `Relinquished By:'. ' 2.. Relinquished By 3. > (i ',$ .- r' Project Number:. - Total Number of Containers Signature: . Time: : ; ^. J i 1 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: ,_( , `' �i• • ,-,.. Project Name: Al() C :G �Aa aL COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date: : ,./..... Sl(, 1, Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: (.- ., a... j.)1 -, t.: No.", Received Good Cond. /Cold r -` _ i • Ongoing Project? Yes • No 0 Delivery Method: _ (attach shipping bill. if any) Company: Company: Company: Sampler: (,q:•: � t ;::Instructions , °Reeeh red)By 1`` Received By 2:.' Received By 3.. Requested Turnaround Time: ,, . c • 1 Signature: "-' . -- Time: "n Signature: lime: Signature: Time: - Special Instructions: ti p - `. J') S' •' • �-r ' .- t .) [ ' v �• Printed Name: Date: / •) , -71/0.; Printed Name: � Date: Printed Name: Date: • -/:,; f0-72 Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink - Shannon 8. Wilson - .Inh FiIP Company: i--• <'- Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT TRAINING LABORATORY SERVICES NVL LABORATORIES INC 4708 AURORA AVE. N. SEATTLE. WA 98103 TOLL FREE 1.888.NVL.LABS (685.5227) TEL 206. 547.0100 FAX 206.634.1936 E -MAIL info@nNlabs.com www.nvllabs.com October 29, 2001 Cody Johnson Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 RE: Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis; NVL Batch # 21- 11906.00 Dear Mr. Johnson: Enclosed please find test results for the bulk samples submitted to our Laboratories for analysis. Examination of these samples was conducted for the presence of identifiable asbestos fibers using polarized light microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining in accordance to U.S. EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Test Method. For samples containing more than one separable layer of materials, the report will include findings for each layer (labeled LAYER 1 and LAYER 2, etc. for each individual layer). The asbestos concentration in the sample is determined by visual estimation. For those samples with asbestos concentrations between 1 and 10 percent based on visual estimation, the EPA recommends a procedure known as point counting .(NESHAPS, 40 CFR Part 61). Point counting is a statistically more accurate means of quantification for samples with low concentrations of asbestos. If you would like us to further refine the concentration estimates of asbestos in these samples using point counting, please let me know. This report is considered highly confidential and will not be released without your approval. Samples are archived for two weeks following analysis. Samples that are not retrieved by the client are discarded after two weeks. Thank you for using our laboratory services. Please feel free to call if there is anything further we can assist you with. Sincerely, cP>)" Technica Director Enc.: Sample Results NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106345 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106346 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001�y ■ Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bu samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0-3 %, 5 %= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20%= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 1 ector NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106347 Client Sample Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS LAYER 1: LAYER 2: LAYER 3: #: A- DW01 -03 compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky TYPE: *None Detected *None Detected *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106348 Client Sample Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% #: A- DW01 -04 compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Steve Zhang Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All " Wimples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0-3%, 5 %= >1 -9%, 10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %3= 10 -30 %, 50%=40-60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 2 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 NVLAP #102063 Client: Address: Attn.: Project: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Mr. Cody Johnson MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106349 Client Sample #: A- DW01 -05 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White paint LAYER 2: White compacted powdery material LAYER 3: Brown paper with white chalky material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 3: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Paint LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Calcareous matrix, Fine particles PERCENT ND ND ND Lab ID #: 21106350 Client Sample #: A- MAS01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106351 Client Sample #: A- MAS01 -02 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) i Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Date: 10/29/2001 Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A ' samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported 9'o Asbestos (1%= >0 -3%, 5%= >1 -9%, 100=5 -150, 20%= 10 -30%, 50%= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 3 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle,. WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106352 Client Sample #: Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Brown mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 2% A- MAS01 -03 ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Mastic /binder PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106353 Client Sample #: A- VFT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown mastic LAYER 2: White tile LAYER 3: Black asphaltic mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% LAYER 3: Cellulose 2% NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Mastic /binder LAYER 2: Calcareous matrix LAYER 3: Asphalt /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND LAYER 3: Chrysotile 3% Lab ID #: 21106354 Client Sample #: A- VFT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: White tile LAYER 2: Black asphaltic mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Cellulose 2% LAYER 2: Cellulose 2% ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Calcareous matrix LAYER 2: Asphalt /binder PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Nic -- -- J 'cal D' Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. —gnu w mples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0 -3 %, 5%=>1-9%, 10%=5-15%, 20%= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the US. Government. Page 4 NVL Laboratories, Inc. 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLA-P #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number. 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: Chrysotile 3% Lab ID #: 21106355 Client Sample #: A- CB01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Grey rubbery material LAYER 2: White mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106356 Client Sample #: A- CB02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Grey rubbery material LAYER 2: White mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 wow— -Now Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. A •ulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3%, 5%= >1 -9 %, 10%= 5-15 %, 20%= 10 -30 %, 50 %= 40 -60%). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 5 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 • Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 Lab ID #: 21106357 Client Sample #: A- CB03 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected NON-FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106358 Client Sample #: A- CB04 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: *None Detected LAYER 2: Mastic /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT LAYER 1: *None Detected ND LAYER 2: *None Detected ND Lab ID #: 21106359 Client Sample #: A- CB05 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: LAYER 1: Brown rubbery material LAYER 2: Yellow mastic OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ASBESTOS TYPE: NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: LAYER 1: Rubber /binder LAYER 2: Mastic /binder PERCENT (Sample results are continued on the next page.) Sampled by: Client Analyzed by: Steve Zhang Reviewed by: Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Ni • •lr- Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All : Wimples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1 %= >0 -3 %, 5 %= >1- 9 %,10 %= 5-15 %, 20 %= 10 -30 %, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 6 NVL Laboratories, Inc. Tel: 206.547.0100 Fax: 206.634.1936 4708 Aurora Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98103 Bulk Asbestos Fiber Analysis NVLAP #102063 Client: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Address: 400 North 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 Attn.: Mr. Cody Johnson Project: MOF Expansion NVL Batch Number: 21- 11906.00 Client Project #: 21 -1- 09383 -009 Number of samples: 18 LAYER 1: *None Detected LAYER 2: *None Detected ND ND Lab ID #: 21106360 Client Sample #: A- CT01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey fibrous and porous material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 45 %, Glass fibers 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix, Perlite, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106361 Client Sample #: A- CT02 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey fibrous and porous material with paint OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: Cellulose 45 %, Glass fibers 15% ASBESTOS TYPE: *None Detected NON - FIBROUS MATERIALS: Fine particles, Calcareous matrix, Perlite, Paint PERCENT ND Lab ID #: 21106362 Client Sample #: B- CLK01 -01 Sample Location: MOF Expansion Description: Grey rubbery material OTHER FIBROUS MATERIALS: NON- FIBROUS MATERIALS: *None Detected Rubber /binder ASBESTOS TYPE: PERCENT *None Detected ND Sampled by: Analyzed by: Reviewed by: Client Steve Zhang Nick Ly Date: 10/29/2001 Date: 10/29/2001 Note: If samples are not homogeneous, then subsamples of the components were analyzed separately. All bulk samples are analyzed using EPA 600 /R- 93/116 Method with the following measurement uncertainties for the reported % Asbestos (1%= >0-3 %, 5%= >1- 9%,10% = 5-15%, 20%= 10 -30%, 50%= 40 -60 %). This report relates only to the items tested. If samples were not collected by NVL personnel, then the accuracy of the results is limited by the methodology and acuity of the sample collector. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of NVL Laboratories, Inc. It shall not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. Government. Page 7 Page�_ot . <? ="' SHANNON F�WILSON.INC. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD Laboratory Nv • =W Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants r Attn. 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 11500 Olive Blvd:, Suite 276 Seattle, WA 98103 St. Louis, MO 63141 Analysis Parameters/SampleContainer Description (206) 632 -8020 (314) 872 -8170 • . (include preservative if lased) 695 -6777 Fax (314) 872 -8178 Fax (206) 2055 Hill Road 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite 3 303 Wellsian Way Fairbanks, AK 99709 Anchorage, AK 99518 Richland, WA 99352 (907) 479 -0600 (907) 561 -2120 (509) 946 -6309 `)7 4. 0 (907) 479 -5691 Fax (907) 561 -4483 Fax (509) 946 -6580 Fax J���cv' Date o�Q' Sao ��,'N o'�� Goc` Remarks /Matrix Sample Identity Lab No. Time Sampled G r o . A -J O1' v la .I'/2L4./4t %( A-bJ)4)1 -1) -t. I � , - A -D+-Ju` '� 1 1 I A•p,3Ji 0'LI 0 1 - S I /a •`? .mAcot'- v1 i A- ✓t.1 A S d 1- u 1 /} ./hAv1 -1/4,3 A - V "1 J Z –v' i; 4 Project Information,! :_ :: • : Sample Receipt Relinquished By: 1. Relinquished By 2.Relingtaished By ;;:3. Project Number', 1 -1- 6`11..4.3-4)4 Total Number of Containers Signature: .� Time: ) r� ;i) Signature: Time: Signature: Time: `.. ' i / - Project Name: mt.) f- E 4,.,,r- COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Name: Date: J .'Itr-I /:. i r_" ' `/n !' `; � ,."_:.i "�' Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: r „�t. ..1: -, •1.5 Received Good Cond. /Cold Ongoing Project? Yes No Delivery Method: ry (attach shipping bill, if any) Company;/ 5 '- `'•-) Company: Company Sampler: C74" ' Instructions'', <::;:`' , . Received By :.:: 1. ..Received By 2. Signature: Time: Received By 3.' Signature Time: Requested Turnaround Time: .(. „.1,,p A) Signatiire�_- J Time: :%SD \ — ( �~ ,y- Special Instructions: , `' �p C ��= 1 • .r • /' ' "' •. S -t' ✓ • e -, Printed Name: ' Date: / �',e 1/1 Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: L. w-)t)7r(. /5 j Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Pink Shannon & Wilson Job File Company: �1 / , . 'J•• Company: Company: - - F-19-91/UR 1■Tn J. c '. -- -"' SHANNON %WILSON, INC. = Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 400 N. 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 (206) 632 -8020 (206) 695 -6777 Fax 2055 Hill Road Fairbanks, AK 99709 (907) 479-0600 (907) 479 -5691 Fax mole Identi 11500 Olive Blvd., Suite 276 St. Louis, MO 63141 (314) 872 -8170 (314) 872 -8178 Fax 5430 Fairbanks Street, Suite Anchorage, AK 99518 (907) 561 -2120 (907) 561 -4483 Fax Lab No. CHAIN -OF- CUSTODY RECORD 3 303 Wellsian Way Richland, WA 99352 (509) 946 -6309 (509) 946 -6580 Fax Time Date Sampled Laboratory Attn• Z /V V L age Analysis Parameters/Sample Container Description (include preservative if used) 0 ce>y 0 0� N.OyG Remarks /Matrix 4- C (3U 1- u \ 1�Dlr.t�lui k •�.. A -( (1,0-2. -0 1 i Ar - r c�v3 -0I i 1 A- - (1 bvs -uN A_ �,,r�i - °t • i c>– C t 1/ -- 0 \ .\--474: 01 -1-. i= _ : ,1 . Project Information . 'Sample Receipt Relinquished By: 1. Relinquished By: 2. l Relinquished By: 43. Project Number:Zt -t - 0c73t -3- ./ Total Number of Containers Signature: I • Time: iti 40 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: , �' � , Project Name:1�j� F I; „ r. rJ,.� .^ COC Seals /Intact? Y /N /NA Printed Narpe:- Date: i ✓L t i Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: Contact: <;- _,.) , V. N o - Received Good Cond. /Cold 1 C.,, 0 ., J:; 11 ,.. S. .:)- -� 1"-S-1, Ongoing Project? Yes • No Delive Method: ry (attach shipping bill, if any) Company: �� i't's Company: Company: Sampler: C /V" j Instructions ,. Received''By: _ 1. Received By 2. Received By 3.. Requested Turnaround Time: Signature: Time: �::-:49 Signature: Time: Signature: Time: Special Instructions: Printed Name: Date: ;;;I:71-40; 'Printed Name: Date: Printed Name: Date: �y�) rt- (SCE : i Distribution: White - w /shipment - returned to Shannon & Wilson w/ laboratory report Yellow - w /shipment - for consignee files Dell. _ C/.nnnnn 2 %M n _ Inh Pan Company: /01,1,-- Company: Company: F- 19 -91/UR No. SHANNON &WI LSON. INC. 21-1-09383-009 Photo A: Roof of Building 14 -06 with ACM siding, tar patch on duct work, and built -up roofing materials. Photo B: Interior of Building 14 -06 showing wall system with ACM joint compound. 21 -1- 09383 -009 Photo D: Office section in Hangar A showing vinyl floor tiles with ACM mastic. 21-1-09383-009 Photo F: Interior of Hangar B showing green LBP on hangar beams. "It , 4'4 4- • ‘Z, 21-1-09383-009 21-1-09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attachment to and part of Report 21 -1- 09383 -009 Date: November 16, 2001 To: Mr. Bart Heath The Seneca Real Estate Group Important Information About Your Geotechnical/Environmental Report CONSULTING SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND FOR SPECIFIC CLIENTS. Consultants prepare reports to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, your consultant prepared your report expressly for you and expressly for the purposes you indicated. No one other than you should apply this report for its intended purpose without first conferring with the consultant. No party should apply this report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the consultant. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS BASED ON PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS. A geotechnical/environmental report is based on a subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a unique set of project - specific factors. Depending on the project, these may include: the general nature of the structure and property involved; its size and configuration; its historical use and practice; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; other improvements such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities; and the additional risk created by scope -of- service limitations imposed by the client. To help avoid costly problems, ask the consultant to evaluate how any factors that change subsequent to the date of the report may affect the recommendations. Unless your consultant indicates otherwise, your report should not be used: (1) when the nature of the proposed project is changed (for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated one, or chemicals are discovered on or near the site); (2) when the size, elevation, or configuration of the proposed project is altered; (3) when the location or orientation of the proposed project is modified; (4) when there is a change of ownership; or (5) for application to an adjacent site. Consultants cannot accept responsibility for problems that may occur if they are not consulted after factors which were considered in the development of the report have changed. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE. Subsurface conditions may be affected as a result of natural processes or human activity. Because a geotechnical/environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions should not be based on a report whose adequacy may have been affected by time Ask the consultant to advise if additional tests are desirable before construction starts; for example, groundwater conditions commonly vary seasonally. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical/environmental report. The consultant should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. MOST RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS. Site exploration and testing identifies actual surface and subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken. The data were extrapolated by your consultant, who then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions. The actual interface between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than your report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from those predicted in your report. While nothing can be done to prevent such situations, you and your consultant can work together to help reduce their impacts. Retaining your consultant to observe subsurface construction operations can be particularly beneficial in this respect. A REPORT'S CONCLUSIONS ARE PRELIMINARY. The conclusions contained in your consultant's report are preliminary because they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork; therefore, you should retain your consultant to observe actual conditions and to provide conclusions. Only the consultant who prepared the report is fully familiar with the background information needed to determine whether or not the report's Page 1 of 2 1/2001 recommendations based on those conclusions are valid and whether or not the contractor is abiding by applicable recommendations. The consultant who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the adequacy of the report's recommendations if another party is retained to observe construction. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION. Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretation of a geotechnical/environmental report. To help avoid these problems, the consultant should be retained to work with other project design professionals to explain relevant geotechnical, geological, hydrogeological, and environmental findings, and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to these issues. BORING LOGS AND /OR MONITORING WELL DATA SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT. Final boring logs developed by the consultant are based upon interpretation of field logs (assembled by site personnel), field test results, and laboratory and/or office evaluation of field samples and data. Only final boring logs and data are customarily included in geotechnical/environmental reports. These final logs should not, under any circumstances, be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. To reduce the likelihood of boring log or monitoring well misinterpretation, contractors should be given ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering/environmental report prepared or authorized for their use. If access is provided only to the report prepared for you, you should advise contractors of the report's limitations, assuming that a contractor was not one of the specific persons for whom the report was prepared, and that developing construction cost estimates was not one of the specific purposes for which it was prepared. While a contractor may gain important knowledge from a report prepared for another party, the contractor should discuss the report with your consultant and perform the additional or alternative work believed necessary to obtain the data specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating purposes. Some clients hold the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps prevent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes that aggravate them to a disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY. Because geotechnical /environmental engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against consultants. To help prevent this problem, consultants have developed a number of clauses for use in their contracts, reports and other documents. These responsibility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to transfer the consultant's liabilities to other parties; rather, they are definitive clauses that identify where the consultant's responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your consultant will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. The preceding paragraphs are based on information provided by the ASFE /Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences, Silver Spring, Maryland Page 2 of 2 1/2001 RECErI Et FEB 19 2002 COMMUNITY DEVELOP'.' ENT SHANNON 6WILSON, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS At Shannon & Wilson, our mission is to be a progressive, well - managed professional consulting firm in the fields of engineering and applied earth sciences. Our goal is to perform our services with the highest degree of professionalism with due consideration to the best interests of the public, our clients, and our employees. Final Geotechnical Report Museum of Flight'Expansion Tukwila, Washington November 2001 Submitted To: Bart Heath The Seneca Real Estate Group, Inc. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2350 Seattle, Washington 98101 By: Shannon & Wilson, Inc. 400 N 34th Street, Suite 100 Seattle, Washington 98103 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWILSON9,1NC. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report contains the results of our geotechnical field explorations and engineering studies performed for the Museum of Flight Expansion project. The expansion may include an enclosure (roof) over the existing Red Barn, the 2 -story Military Gallery at the north end of the existing structure, a pedestrian bridge over East Marginal Way South, and the Commercial Gallery on the west side of the roadway. Phasing studies continue, and some changes in the development program may result. This report addresses the early expansion plans and is applicable to alternatives as of November 2001. Subsurface Conditions. In general, the subsurface soils consist of fill, alluvial, estuarine, and lacustrine deposits. The near surface variable fill material is underlain by loose Duwamish River alluvial deposits and soft lacustrine deposits extending to depths of about 95 feet below the existing ground surface. Estuarine deposits of medium dense to very dense sand underlie the lacustrine layer. In our nearby King County International Airport air traffic control tower boring, the dense estuarine sand layer was about 30 to 35 feet thick and was underlain by a stiff to very stiff clay and silt. At the Museum of Flight, groundwater was encountered variably, between elevations 6 and 12 feet. Effect on Design and Construction. The effect of these subsurface conditions on the design and construction of the Museum of Flight Expansion can be briefly summarized as follows: • The upper loose to medium dense soils are susceptible to earthquake- induced liquefaction and settlement • The deeper dense sand unit (estuarine deposit) will support high capacity foundation piles • Groundwater encountered during shallow excavations and stripping should be limited and controllable Seismic Design. The project is located in a moderately active seismic zone. The largest historical earthquakes in the region are the magnitude 7.1 Olympia earthquake of April 13, 1949, the magnitude 6.5 Seattle- Tacoma earthquake of April 29, 1965, and the recent magnitude 6.8 Nisqually earthquake of February 28, 2001. The subsurface soils beneath the project have a high susceptibility to liquefaction to a depth of about 35 feet and would lose considerable strength down to a depth of about 70 feet during a large earthquake. Liquefaction- induced ground surface settlements are estimated to be on the order of half a foot to a foot. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWiLSON, INC. In accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC), the site is classified as a Soil Type SF due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soils. The UBC requires a site - specific evaluation for SF sites. Based on our field explorations in the area, and our detailed seismic analysis of the King County International Airport air traffic control tower, we have developed design earthquake ground motions (including response spectra) consistent with the current UBC criteria. Foundation Design. We recommend that the proposed structures be supported on deep foundations such as driven or drilled piles bearing in the underlying, dense estuarine deposit. The seismic loading conditions control the pile design. Driven piles, either 24 -inch, octagonal, prestressed, concrete or 24- inch - diameter, closed -end steel pipe piles, would have a design load of 125 tons per pile. Drilled 18- inch - diameter augercast concrete piles would have a design load of 65 tons per pile. All three pile types would be on the order of 100 feet long in order to achieve the required capacity during and after the design earthquake event. Geotechnical parameters are provided for the lateral resistance analysis of the piles using the computer program LPILEPLUs Subgrade Preparation. For floor slabs and exterior pavements, we recommend excavating the site as needed, then compacting the upper 18 inches of the subgrade to 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. After compacting and proof rolling the surface, an 18- inch -thick layer of compacted, permeable, well - graded, imported material would be used beneath interior concrete slabs for slab support and as a capillary break. Above the vapor barrier, an additional 6 inches of capillary break material should be placed (per Sellen Construction). For exterior pavements, base course material would be placed and compacted on top of the prepared subgrade. Building Performance. These recommendations will result in different support characteristics and a potential for different long -term performance of the expansion compared to the existing structure. These different performance characteristics result from the evolution of seismic design criteria and apply only to earthquake loading conditions. Flexible Pavement Design. Asphalt pavement sections for the areas that will handle aircraft traffic and those for buses- or autos -only were developed using the 1995 FAA program LEDFAA and the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, respectively. The recommended pavement sections assume that the subgrade will be prepared and compacted to 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 11 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON EIW LSON. ANC. increase the strength from the presently unimproved condition. The design pavement sections for the aircraft areas and the bus -only areas provide for full -depth frost protection, while the design for the auto -only areas provide limited frost protection. 21 -1- 09383- 001.r1.doc /wp /eet 111 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON VILSON,INC. eye TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 3.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM 3 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING 4 6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5 7.0 ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 7.1 Analyses Based on Observed Conditions and Design Requirements 6 7.2 Earthquake Engineering 7 7.2.1 Ground Motions 7 7.2.2 Earthquake Hazards 8 7.3 Deep Foundations 10 7.3.1 Pile Design Requirements 10 7.3.2 Axial Pile Capacities 10 7.3.3 Existing Facilities' Foundations 12 7.3.4 Other Foundation Alternatives 13 7.3.5 Lateral Pile Resistance 13 7.3.6 Estimated Pile Settlements 13 7.4 Retaining Wall Footings 14 7.5 Lateral Earth Pressures on Walls and Lateral Resistance for Wall Footings 14 7.6 Slabs -on -grade Subgrade Recommendations 15 7.7 Flexible Asphalt Pavements 16 7.7.1 Design Approaches 17 7.7.1.1 AASHTO Design Method 17 7.7.1.2 FAA Design Method 18 7.7.2 Subgrade Strength 18 7.7.3 Aircraft and Vehicular Traffic Loads 19 7.7.4 Pavement Design Sections 21 7.7.4.1 AC PVMT Type I Areas 21 7.7.4.2 AC PVMT Type II Areas 22 7.7.5 Frost Protection 23 7.8 Permanent Groundwater and Surface Water Drainage and Control 24 21 -1- 09383- 001.r1.doc /wp /eet iv 21 -1- 09383 -001 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) it ,NNON b \MLSON, INC. Page 7.9 Backfill Material, Placement, and Compaction 24 7.10 Site Grading, Excavation, and Temporary Cut Slopes 25 7.10.1 Site Preparation 25 7.10.2 Excavation and Temporary Groundwater Control 27 7.10.3 General Excavation and Temporary Cut Slopes 28 8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 28 8.1 Driven Pile Installation 28 8.1.1 Pile Driving Equipment 28 8.1.2 Pile Driving Conditions 29 8.1.3 Wave Equation Analysis 29 8.1.4 Monitoring Pile Driving 30 8.1.5 Pile Driving Vibrations, Movement Monitoring, and Noise Levels 30 8.2 Augercast Concrete Pile Installation 31 8.3 Test Pile Program 32 8.4 Wet Weather Earthwork 34 8.5 Construction Observation 34 9.0 LIMITATIONS 35 10.0 REFERENCES 37 LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1 Recommended Parameters for Lateral Resistance Analysis Using LPILEPLus 2 Pile and Driving Equipment Data Sheet LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. 1 Vicinity Map 2 Site and Exploration Plan 3 Generalized Subsurface Profile A -A' 4 Recommended Design Response Spectrum 5 Estimated Seismic Capacity 24 -inch Octagonal Prestressed Concrete Pile 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet v 21 -1- 09383 -001 TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.) LIST OF FIGURES (cont.) Figure No. S N.NNON &W LSON, INC. 6 Estimated Seismic Capacity 24- inch - diameter Closed -end Pipe Pile 7 Estimated Seismic Capacity 18- inch - diameter Closed -end Pipe Pile 8 Estimated Seismic Capacity 24- inch - diameter Augercast Concrete Pile 9 Typical Basement Wall Perimeter Drain and Backfill LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Field Explorations B Geotechnical Laboratory Testing C Liquefaction Potential D Heavy Falling Weight Deflectometer (HWD) Test Results E Important Information About Your Geotechnical Report 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet vi 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWOLSON. INC. FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 1.0 INTRODUCTION This final geotechnical report presents the results of our field explorations, laboratory testing, and engineering design recommendations and conclusions for the proposed Museum of Flight Expansion, located adjacent to and across the street from the existing Museum of Flight. Refer to the Vicinity Map, Figure 1, for the regional project location. We understand that planning and phasing discussions are still underway, but that the Museum of Flight Expansion may consist of the following elements: ► Enclosure over the existing Red Barn. ► Two -story Military Gallery with basement level with classroom space immediately north of the Red Barn. ► Pedestrian sky -bridge over East Marginal Way South. ► Commercial (or West) Gallery on the west side of East Marginal Way South. The Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2, illustrates the locations of these project features. We understand that the Military Gallery and Red Barn enclosure will have relatively heavy column loads while the Commercial Gallery and pedestrian bridge will be lightly loaded. 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose and scope of our work was to explore the subsurface conditions, summarize the exploration and laboratory test data, and provide geotechnical recommendations for the foundation, pavement, and seismic design of the proposed Museum of Flight Expansion. Our services included the following: ► Identifying and reviewing existing geotechnical information. ► Drilling and sampling two deep soil borings (designated B -1 and B -2). ► Drilling and sampling four shallow soil borings (designated B -3 through B -6). 21-1-09383-001 .r I .doc /wp /eet 1 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWiLSON, INC. . ► Drilling and installing two shallow observation wells (designated OW -1 and OW -2). ► Performing three deep piezocone probes (also called cone penetration tests or CPTs, and designated CPT -2, CPT -4, and CPT -6). ► Performing three deep seismic CPTs (designated CPT -1, CPT -3, and CPT -5). ► Performing a series of Heavy Falling Weight Deflectometer (HWD) tests for the Commercial Gallery. ► Preparing a subsurface profile through the project site. ► Conducting engineering and seismic analyses. ► Summarizing our conclusions and recommendations in two preliminary design memoranda, a draft report, and this final report. We also completed hazardous materials surveys for affected buildings. A separate report of those conditions is in preparation at the time of this writing. We reviewed the following existing Museum of Flight geotechnical reports: ► "Proposed Museum of Flight, Soils and Foundation Investigation ", letter report for Ibsen Nelson, Architect by Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, dated June 22, 1979. ► "Pacific Museum of Flight Phase I, Seattle, Washington, Soils and Foundation Investigation ", letter report for Ibsen Nelson and Associates by Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, dated August 15, 1980. ► "Pacific Museum of Flight Phase II, Soils and Foundation Investigation ", letter report for Ibsen Nelson & Associates by Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, dated October 31, 1980. ► "Pacific Museum of Flight Phase II, Seattle, Washington, Soils and Foundation Investigation ", letter report for Ibsen Nelson and Associates by Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, dated August 24, 1983. In addition, we reviewed the available geotechnical information from surrounding Boeing buildings, data in our files on other major Boeing Field -area projects, and the Phase II Environmental Site Assessment report for the Commercial Gallery portion of the project by GeoEngineers entitled "Report, Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 9725 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington, dated March 12, 2001." 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 2 21 -1- 09383 -001 !N, 3.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Museum of Flight Expansion project is located adjacent to and nearby the existing Museum of Flight, southwest of the King County International Airport at Boeing Field, and along East Marginal Way South. The approximate locations of the existing and proposed project features are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. A major arterial, East Marginal Way South bisects the project site. The Commercial Gallery will be 144,500 square feet, the Military Gallery will be 153,600 square feet (on 3 floors), and the Red Barn enclosure with a basement will be 84,000 square feet. The project site is located within the Duwamish River valley and is relatively flat with maximum topographic relief of about 6 feet across the entire site. Several existing structures are located on the approximately 7 -acre site along the east side of East Marginal Way South, including the existing Great Gallery of the Museum of Flight, the Red Barn, and two King County (KC) International Airport hangars (Hangars A and B). The two aircraft hangars will be relocated about 1/3 of a mile north of the site in order to provide additional parking for the museum; the hangar relocation site is known as lots 13 and 14. We have prepared a separate geotechnical report for the hangar site. The 5.5 -acre Commercial Gallery site located to the northwest across East Marginal Way South currently consists of a large asphalt parking area and an existing two - story concrete Boeing building. The Commercial Gallery has a planned future triangular- shaped expansion on the north side of the proposed gallery (see Figure 2). The Commercial Gallery will be just above the grade of East Marginal Way South. The site slopes gently down towards the northwest; therefore, fill will be required to achieve the final grade of 19.5 feet. The Military Gallery and Red Barn enclosure areas will be excavated to elevation 12.4 feet. The excavations will require removal of about 3 to 6 feet and about 9 feet of soil at the gallery and enclosure, respectively. The Military Gallery will have a basement level and two upper floors. The Red Barn enclosure will have a basement level and a main level. The Red Barn enclosure basement level (elevation 9 feet based on the old datum equals elevation 12.4 feet on the new datum) will match the existing Red Barn basement. 4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION PROGRAM Subsurface conditions at the Museum of Flight Expansion project were interpreted from 6 soil borings (2 deep and 4 shallow), 2 observation wells, 6 CPTs, and a series of FWD tests. The 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 3 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON Z1W LSON, INC. locations of the borings, observation wells, and CPTs are shown on Figure 2. The borings and wells were drilled with a combination of hollow -stem auger and mud rotary techniques. The shallow borings were drilled to 5 feet below the existing grade; the deep borings were drilled to depths of 122 and 102 feet in B -1 and B -2, respectively. The observation wells were about 15 feet deep, and the .CPTs ranged from 92 to 118 feet deep. The logs for the borings, wells, and CPTs are presented in Appendix A, Field Explorations, as Figures A -2 through A -15. A description of the field methods and procedures used during drilling, sampling, and pushing the cones are included in Appendix A. The HWD tests were performed to evaluate the modulus of subgrade reaction for designing rigid concrete slabs -on -grade and resilient modulus for designing flexible asphalt pavements. Pavement Consultants, Inc. (PCI) performed the work under subcontract to Shannon & Wilson, Inc. Appendix D presents PCI's report, which describes their field methods and procedures, and presents the test results. Our scope did not initially include environmental services except that we screened the boring and observation well soil samples that were above the water table with a photoionization detector (PID) to determine if there were petroleum - based volatile organic compounds present. We also took extra near - surface samples in boring B -1 (south of the Red Barn) in order to screen for volatiles. No volatiles were observed during our screening. Subsequently, Shannon & Wilson was contracted to conduct a hazardous materials survey at affected buildings. The results of that survey are presented separately from this report. 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING Geotechnical laboratory tests were performed on selected samples retrieved from the borings and observation wells to determine soil index and engineering properties encountered at the site. The tests were performed in the Shannon & Wilson soils laboratory by an experienced technician or engineer. The soil tests included visual classification, natural water contents, grain -size distributions, and Atterberg Limits tests. Descriptions of the test methods and summaries of the test results are presented in Appendix B, Geotechnical Laboratory Testing. The natural water contents and Atterberg Limits are also shown on the boring logs in Appendix A. 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 4 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WILSON. iNC. 6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Based on the soils encountered during the subsurface explorations, the Museum of Flight Expansion site is underlain by fill which, in turn, is underlain by Duwamish River alluvial deposits as well as estuarine and lacustrine deposits. The subsurface conditions inferred from the field explorations are generalized on the subsurface profile on Figure 3; more detailed soil descriptions are presented on the boring, well and CPT logs in Appendix A. The site is covered by fill encountered to approximate depths ranging from 4 to 19 feet below the existing ground surface. These deposits consist of very loose to medium dense, and soft to stiff, intermixed silty fine sand, fine sandy silt and clayey silt. The fill appears to be thinner in the vicinity of the existing Museum of Flight, and thicker towards the northwest. Below the fill, a relatively thick deposit of loose to medium dense, clean to silty, fine to medium sand was encountered to a depth of 58 feet in the vicinity of boring B -1 and to 36 feet at CPT -5. The upper portion of the sand deposit may include hydraulic fill placed during early development of the site. The hydraulic fill could be similar in appearance and density to the underlying alluvial sand deposit. Underlying the upper sand deposit is an interbedded alluvial layer of loose to medium dense, slightly silty, fine to medium sand and fine sandy silt, with soft, clayey silt seams. This layer is approximately 10 feet thick in the vicinity of boring B -1 and thickens to the northwest to approximately 28 feet in the vicinity of CPT -5. Abundant organics were encountered within this layer. Underlying the relatively cohesionless deposits described above, very soft to soft, clayey silt with a trace of fine sand was encountered to depths of 86 to 93 feet below the ground surface. This is a lacustrine deposit. The clayey silt deposit is underlain by a relatively thin (less than 5 feet thick) layer of very loose to medium dense, silty, fine to medium sand. Cone penetration tests CPT -2, CPT -3, CPT -4, and CPT -6 encountered thin lenses of soft to medium stiff, clayey silt underlying the very loose to medium dense sand; this silt unit was not encountered in the other borings and CPTs performed for this project. 21 -1- 09383- 001.r1.doc /wp /eet 5 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WI LSON. INC. The very loose to medium dense sand is underlain by an estuarine deposit consisting of dense to very dense slightly silty to silty, fine to medium sand, with a trace of gravel. This unit begins at about elevation -80 feet. Abundant shell fragments were encountered in both sand units. In addition to our field explorations for the museum expansion, we are also utilizing information from our recent deep boring at the King County International Airport air traffic control tower (KC tower). In that deep boring, which was drilled to a depth of 211 feet, the dense sand layer was about 30 to 35 feet thick and was underlain by a stiff to very stiff, slightly clayey, fine sandy silt. Groundwater observations were made during drilling. Where mud - rotary methods were used to drill, groundwater levels were difficult to identify. Piezometers were installed in OW -1 and OW -2 to monitor groundwater levels. The groundwater levels in the CPTs were also noted. In general, groundwater was encountered between 5 and 12 feet below the existing ground surface during our field exploration program, varying between elevations 6 and 12 feet. However, we anticipate that site groundwater levels may fluctuate a foot or two with seasonal variations in rainfall. 7.0 ENGINEERING CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 Analyses Based on Observed Conditions and Design Requirements Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the field explorations and our understanding of the project, engineering studies were performed to develop conclusions and recommendations regarding the following: (1) seismic design criteria, (2) seismically- induced geologic hazards, (3) deep foundations for the proposed structures, (4) lateral earth pressures and resistance, (5) pavement design parameters for the interior concrete slabs and pavement design sections for exterior asphalt pavements, (6) drainage, (7) backfill material, and (8) temporary cut slopes. A discussion of our studies, analyses, conclusions, and recommendations are presented in the following sections. The deep foundations section also includes a discussion of the existing facilities' foundations and other foundation alternatives that were conceptually evaluated by the design team. 21 -1- 09383 -001. r 1.doc /wp /eet 6 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WILSON. INC. 7.2 Earthquake Engineering 7.2.1 Ground Motions The project is located in a moderately active seismic region. While the region has historically experienced moderate to large earthquakes (i.e., April 13, 1949, magnitude 7.1 Olympia Earthquake; April 29, 1965, magnitude 6.5 Seattle- Tacoma Earthquake; February 28, 2001, magnitude 6.8 Nisqually Earthquake), geologic evidence suggests that larger earthquakes have occurred in the recent past and will continue to occur in the future (e.g., magnitude 81 to 9 Cascadia Subduction Zone Interplate events, magnitude 7 1/2 Seattle Fault events). We understand that the project will be designed in accordance with the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC, 1997). The UBC requires that the seismicity of the region be considered in building design by requiring that structures be designed for earthquake ground motions with a 10 percent chance of being exceeded in 50 years (475 -year recurrence). Accordingly, the UBC indicates that the project site is located in Seismic Zone 3 (peak ground acceleration on rock of approximately 0.3g). More recent regional ground motion studies conducted by the USGS (Frankel et al., 1996) indicate that the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for a 475 -year recurrence in the vicinity of the site for "soft" rock conditions would be approximately 0.33g. In addition to seismicity, the UBC also requires that the response of the subsurface soils at the site be considered in developing design earthquake ground motions. Subsurface conditions beneath the site correspond UBC Soil Profile Type SF due to the presence of potentially liquefiable soil. The UBC requires that a site - specific evaluation be conducted for this Soil Profile Type. Shannon &.Wilson recently completed a site - specific ground motion study for the KC Air Traffic Control Tower (Shannon & Wilson, 2001), located 1.2 miles north- northwest of the site. Based on the comparison of subsurface conditions at each site (including shear wave velocities from the seismic CPTs at the site), it is our opinion that the results of the analyses are applicable to the Museum of Flight site. The site - specific ground response analyses performed for the KC Air Traffic Control Tower included the following steps: (1) Development of a target rock uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) for ground motions with a 10 percent probability of exceedance in 50 years based on probabilistic ground motion studies by the USGS (Frankel et al., 1996). 21 -1- 093 83 -001. r l .doc /wp /eet 7 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON ZI\MLSON. INC. (2) Selection of rock input motions from previous earthquakes such that the average of the individual response spectra closely match the target rock UHS. (3) Development of profiles for soil response analyses including characterization of shear wave velocity, dynamic soil properties, soil layer thickness, and unit weights. (4) Use the equivalent - linear program ProShake (EduPro Civil Systems, 1999) and recordings from the BOE ground motion recording station from the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake to back - analyze the profiles to develop a best estimate soil profile (BOE station is located approximately 4,000 feet north- northwest of the Museum of Flight). (5) Calculation of surface response using ProShake, the best estimate soil profile, and the selected rock input motions from (2). (6) Calculation of surface response using the nonlinear program WAVE (Horne, 1996, and Arduino et al., 2001), the best estimate soil profile, and the selected rock input motions from (2). (7) Development of a recommended design spectrum from the results of (5) and (6). The results of the site response analyses outlined above, including the recommended smoothed response spectrum is shown on Figure 4. Because of the importance of the air traffic control tower, the recommended smoothed spectrum was developed to conservatively envelope the range of ground motions calculated from the site response analyses and the motions recorded at the BOE station from the 2001 Nisqually Earthquake. 7.2.2 Earthquake Hazards Earthquake induced geologic hazards that may affect a given site include landsliding, fault rupture, settlement, and liquefaction and associated effects (loss of shear strength, bearing capacity failures, loss of lateral support, ground oscillation, lateral spreading, etc.). Because of the flat topography at the site the risk of landsliding is very low. The potential for fault rupture is also relatively low. The nearest mapped fault (Johnson et al., 1999) is the southernmost strand of the east -west trending Seattle Fault Zone. The Seattle Fault Zone is approximately 21 - to 4 -miles wide (north- south). The site is located about 2 miles south of the southernmost strand. No evidence of Holocene rupture (i.e., no movement within the last 10,000 years) has been observed on the southernmost strand; however multiple Holocene ruptures on the Toe Jam Fault farther north in the Seattle Fault Zone have been observed. 21-1-09383-001 .r l .doc /wp /eet 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. Liquefaction and related effects appear to pose the most likely and significant earthquake- induced geologic hazard at the site. Factors -of- safety against liquefaction were calculated for boring SPT N -value and CPT data for both the design earthquake ground motions and the Nisqually Earthquake ground motions recorded nearby at the BOE station. A description of the calculation methods and factors of safety versus depth are provided in Appendix C. Based on these calculations much of the alluvial sediments above the lacustrine deposit (i.e., above a depth of 60 to 70 feet) have a factor -of- safety against liquefaction of less than 1 and are susceptible to liquefaction under the design earthquake ground motions. We note that historically, most observed liquefaction and liquefaction damage has been due to liquefaction of soils within about 30 feet of the ground surface. There is more uncertainty in estimating soil liquefaction potential of significantly deeper depths (e.g., 60 feet or greater) by extrapolation of the empirical calculation procedure. In general, the factors -of- safety for the soils below a depth of approximately 35 feet are higher than those above this depth. Similarly, the reduction in soil shear strength as a result of liquefaction would be greater in the soils above a depth of about 35 feet than the soils below. Therefore, it is assumed in subsequent foundation analyses presented in this report that the soils above a depth of 35 feet have no significant shear strength under seismic conditions while the shear strengths below this depth are reduced from their static strength. In addition to reduction in soil shear strengths and corresponding reductions in vertical and lateral pile capacities, the effects of the liquefiable soil beneath the site could include lateral spreading (permanent lateral ground displacement) and settlement. Using the empirical procedures by Bartlett and Youd (1995) and the subsurface data in borings B -1 and B -2, free - field lateral displacements west and south, towards the Duwamish River could be on the order of 1 to 4 feet for the design ground motions. The actual lateral ground displacement at and around the existing pile supported structures at the site will likely be less than the estimated free -field displacements but could nevertheless be on the order of several tens of inches. While the range of potential permanent lateral ground displacement ranges over several tens of inches, the difference in lateral spread estimates (i.e., differential movement) between borings B -1 and B -2 is about 3 inches. The relatively small difference in the estimated lateral displacements for these borings is consistent with the uniform subsurface conditions across the site (in terms of liquefaction potential) and the relatively large distance to the Duwamish River from the site. Consequently, we would expect the differential movement across the site to be similar to that 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 9 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON 6 \MLSON. INC. indicated by the difference in estimated movement between borings B -1 and B -2, or on the order of about 3 inches. Free -field ground surface settlements, estimated using the procedures by Tokimatsu and Seed (1987), are on the order 7 to 11 inches. For comparison, we calculated the potential for liquefaction and associated permanent lateral and vertical ground movements during the recent 2001 Nisqually earthquake. The calculated factors of safety against liquefaction for the Nisqually earthquake for the boring SPT N -value and CPT data are presented in Appendix C. In general, the factor -of- safety calculations indicate that liquefaction would have occurred in scattered zones. Consequently, it would be expected that the existing pile foundations in the site area would have seen little significant reduction in vertical or lateral capacity during the Nisqually Earthquake. Horizontal free -field ground displacements would have been estimated to be on the order of to 2 inches, with actual displacements at and around pile supported structures likely to have been less. Free -field ground surface settlements would have been estimated to be on the order of 1 inch or less. 7.3 Deep Foundations 7.3.1 Pile Design Requirements Currently, there are four types of deep foundations under consideration for the Museum of Flight Expansion project: 24 -inch octagonal prestressed concrete piles, 18 -inch- and 24 -inch- diameter closed -end steel pipe piles backfilled with concrete, and 18- inch - diameter augercast concrete piles. Single column loads are as high as 250 kips, and support of those columns using a single high- capacity pile could be an economical approach. Combination column support locations may require multiple piles. Our recommendations are intended to provide the optimum pile type, size, and capacity for the actual column load conditions. 7.3.2 Axial Pile Capacities Based on the results of our liquefaction analysis described above, it is our opinion that the seismic condition will control deep foundation design. During a design earthquake, the soil surrounding the pile foundations would likely liquefy to a depth of about 30 to 35 feet, resulting in a temporary loss of skin friction. The liquefied zone will provide little or no skin friction during liquefaction. The material between about 35 and 70 feet deep could have a significantly reduced frictional capacity, because some of it is potentially liquefiable and is, in turn, underlain by soft clayey silt which provides relatively little frictional capacity under either static or seismic 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 10 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON '68/ViLSON, INC. loading. Therefore, we recommend that the proposed piles be founded in the underlying dense to very dense sand layer beginning at a depth of about 90 to 95 feet below ground surface, or elevation —80 to —85 feet. Estimated maximum, allowable pile capacities are: • 18- inch - diameter, closed -end, steel pipe (concreted - filled) • 24- inch - diameter, closed -end, steel pipe (concrete filled) • 24 -inch octagonal, prestressed concrete • 18- inch - diameter augercast concrete 80 tons 125 tons 125 tons 65 tons The pile foundations would, in effect, be end - bearing piles during the design earthquake event. Immediately following liquefaction, we anticipate that the liquefiable soils will settle several inches as described previously. This liquefaction- induced settlement would likely extend to about 60 feet below the ground surface and would result in a temporary downdrag condition on the piles. The estimated tons of downdrag are presented in the pile capacity plot notes on Figures 5 to 8; the applied downdrag loads should not affect pile performance. Under static loading conditions, the piles would have a surplus of axial capacity. We recommend a pile embedment of at least 5 feet into the bearing layer; however, we also recommend a maximum pile embedment of 10 feet into the bearing layer so that the pile tip is sufficiently above the underlying softer material, as shown on Figures 5 to 8. The design tip elevation for all piles is therefore about —90 feet. Deeper penetration into the bearing layer could lead to lower capacities and greater settlement. Proper pile embedment is critical to pile performance and will require careful observation of pile installation. We recommend that a test pile program be conducted to confirm that the design pile capacity can be achieved at the design pile tip elevation. Our analysis was performed using an in -house computer program that determines ultimate axial compressive capacity by summing ultimate skin friction along the side of the pile and ultimate end bearing at its tip. We applied a factor -of- safety (FS) of 1.5 to the ultimate seismic compressive values. Our analyses were performed for a single pile; no group effects were considered. We recommend that the new piles be spaced no closer than three pile diameters measured center -to- center from either new or existing piles. At this spacing, a group reduction factor is not warranted when estimating group axial capacity. Also, full end bearing within the dense to very dense sand (the bearing soil) is not achieved until the pile has a 21-1-09383-001 .r l .doc /wp /eet 11 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON Wii_SON, INC. minimum penetration of 5 feet into the deposit. The results of our analyses are presented in terms of plots of pile tip depth (penetration) versus allowable seismic compressive and ultimate uplift capacity; the seismic compressive capacities include an FS of 1.5. Each pile type has a separate plot; these plots are presented in Figures 5 through 8. For static loading conditions, we recommend an FS of 2.5 be applied. 7.3.3 Existing Facilities' Foundations The existing facility was built in phases and is founded on a combination of driven timber piles and augercast concrete piles; these piles are about 40 feet long and have a design load of about 20 to 40 tons per pile. We understand that buildings in the surrounding area are also founded on 40- to 50- foot -long augercast piles and have design loads on the order of 50 tons. These nearby buildings as well as the existing museum were built in the early to mid -1980s or before. According to the available geotechnical reports for the surrounding buildings, the seismic design during the mid -1980s was based on a PGA of 0.15g, which resulted in a lower prediction of liquefaction potential compared to our current seismic design standard. The four Museum of Flight geotechnical reports from 1979 through 1983 did not address seismic design or PGA values. Our analyses indicate that 40- foot -long museum piles may lose a majority of their capacity due to liquefaction during the design earthquake event. In addition, the post - liquefaction settlement may cause the piles to settle as much as half a foot to a foot. Therefore, it is likely that the existing facility would not perform at the same level as the proposed structure that will be designed for a larger earthquake. We recommend that the project design consider the significant differential settlements that may occur between the new and existing structures during and after a design -level earthquake. To reduce the potential for damage to the existing building foundations, we recommend that new driven piles be installed at least 10 feet away from the existing piles. Vibration and settlement monitoring should be performed during pile driving; monitoring recommendations are provided in Section 8.1.5. If the piles are installed within 10 feet of existing foundations, detailed vibration and settlement monitoring should be performed to determine the effect of driving on the foundations. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 12 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON 5l\MLSON, INC. 7.3.4 Other Foundation Alternatives Several foundation alternatives were discussed during conceptual design but ruled out due to technical and/or economical reasons. Besides the deep foundations described above, the alternatives included shallow piles with a capacity of 45 tons and spread footings bearing on improved ground (stone columns). Although they would achieve the capacity requirements during static loading, similar to the existing Museum of Flight, the shallow piles would not have adequate capacity during the design earthquake due to liquefaction. In addition, the shallow piles would likely experience significant downward movement due to liquefaction- induced settlements. Stone columns consist of a vertical column of compacted gravel and are typically 3 feet in diameter and spaced between 6 and 10 feet on center depending on site specific requirements. The stone column ground improvement would allow the columns to be supported on spread footings. Stone columns can either be constructed at column locations only, or can be constructed across the entire building footprint. Widespread stone column construction can mitigate shallow liquefaction, reducing the expected settlements during the design seismic event. The soil improvement would increase the overall shear strength of the soil and would allow high pore pressures generated by earthquake shaking to dissipate. We understand that a cost comparison was made and deep foundations were deemed more economical than stone columns /footings. 7.3.5 Lateral Pile Resistance We understand that for this study the computer program LPILEPLUS (Reese and Wang, 1997) would be used to generate P -Y curves for the lateral resistance analysis of the proposed piles. Based on subsurface conditions as interpreted from the explorations accomplished for the expansion, the recommended parameters for input into the LPILEPLUS program are given in Table 1 at the end of the main report text. No efficiency (reduction) factors due to pile group action have been provided. 7.3.6 Estimated Pile Settlements Based on the subsurface conditions at the site, the deep foundation piles would likely extend into dense to very dense soils. Settlement of piles would typically be due to the elastic compression of the pile and settlement of granular soils and consolidation of cohesive soils (stiff 21 -1- 09383 -001.r 1.doc /wp /eet 13 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON MiVILSON1, INC. to very stiff silt) below the pile tips. We based our settlement analysis on the static loading conditions. During static conditions, a majority of the pile load would be taken up by skin friction above the pile tip; therefore, the underlying cohesive layer would not experience a significant increase in pressure due to the piles. In our opinion, the pressure increase on the underling cohesive layer would not be sufficient to cause consolidation settlement. During a design -level earthquake, the majority of the load would be transmitted to the pile tip; however, this loading condition would be temporary and would not have enough time to cause consolidation settlement, in our opinion. Our analyses and conclusions were based on the assumption that the pile tips would be embedded 5 to 10 feet into the bearing layer and that the bearing layer is 30 to 35 feet thick. In our opinion, total settlement for the prestressed octagonal concrete and closed -end steel pipe piles would be on the order of l to 3/4 inch, with differential settlements of about half the total settlement. Total settlement of the augercast concrete piles would be on the order of 3/4 to 11/2 inches, with differential settlements of about' to 3/4 inch. Due to the granular nature of the bearing soils, these settlements would be primarily elastic settlement and would occur essentially as the load is applied. 7.4 Retaining Wall Footings We understand that concrete or segmental concrete, cantilevered, retaining walls may be used on the project; their size, depth, and locations were unknown at the time of this report. Therefore, our subsequent recommendations for retaining wall footings are general in nature. If the retaining wall footings bear in existing fill near the ground surface, we recommend an allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot,(psf), which corresponds to an ultimate bearing capacity of 4,000 psf. The allowable value can be increased by one -third to account for wind and seismic loading conditions. The allowable bearing capacity is based on the assumption that the footing subgrade preparation recommendations in this report are followed. We recommend a minimum embedment of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent grade (for frost protection). We also recommend a minimum footing width of 18 inches for continuous footings. 7.5 Lateral Earth Pressures on Walls and Lateral Resistance for Wall Footings Lateral earth pressures may act on buried portions of the building and retaining walls. For buried walls, we recommend that a static, active, lateral earth pressure corresponding to an equivalent fluid weight of 30 and 40 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) for compacted, imported, structural fill and 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 14 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON IVVILSON, INC. compacted on -site soil, respectively. These values are based on the assumption that proper drainage is provided so that no buildup of hydrostatic pressure occurs and there is a horizontal ground surface behind the wall. The total active earth pressure should be analyzed for seismic loading conditions using a dynamic load increment equal to 30 percent of the static, active, earth force for both the imported fill and on -site soil cases. This percent load increment should be applied as a uniform load to the wall, with the resultant force acting at the mid -point of the wall height. A 30 percent load increase for seismic conditions is consistent with a pseudo- static analysis using the Mononobe- Okabe equation for lateral earth pressures and a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.13g. The seismic coefficient is not necessarily equivalent to the site peak ground acceleration (described in a previous section of this report), as the magnitude of this coefficient accounts for the fact that the peak ground acceleration is experienced only a few times within the record of earthquake shaking, and that the actual earthquake ground motion is cyclic in nature, as opposed to a static force. Values of the seismic coefficient are typically one -third to.one -half the value of the peak ground acceleration that may be experienced at a site. These pressures assume drained conditions and a horizontal ground surface. For retaining walls founded on footings, lateral loads may be resisted by a combination of base friction and passive pressure against the footings and buried portions of walls. We recommend that the base sliding resistance be determined based on an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 for on -site soil. We recommend an allowable passive pressure of 520 pcf and 300 pcf for imported structural fill and on -site soil used as fill, respectively; both of these values are for soil that is above the groundwater table. If the buried portions of the walls are below the groundwater table, we recommend an allowable passive pressure of 250 pcf and 130 pcf for imported structural fill and on -site soil used as fill, respectively. Both the coefficient and passive pressure values above include a factor -of- safety of 1.5. 7.6 Slabs -on -grade Subgrade Recommendations At the Commercial Gallery the finished floor elevation is 19.5, requiring placement of fill in some areas to achieve the final grade. At the Military Gallery to Red Barn Enclosure the finished floor elevation is 12.4 feet, requiring excavation. For a rigid concrete slab built on a subgrade that is improved as described subsequently, we recommend using a modulus of subgrade reaction, k, of 100 pounds per cubic foot (pci). Section 7.10 describes the subgrade 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 15 21 -1- 09383 -001 CAI L SON., ANC. improvements we assumed for this recommendation. Where 4 feet of new structural fill is placed, a k of 300 pci could be used to design slabs on grade. As a comparison, the HWD test data indicated that a k of 75 pci could be used to design slabs -on -grade over an unimproved subgrade (the mean minus one standard deviation of the HWD test results). We can provide recommendations for other alternatives to improve the subgrade, such as cement stabilization, stone columns (previously described), and using a bituminous stabilized base, if desired. These alternatives could provide higher k values. If a slab -on -grade is used, it would require a design that can tolerate settlement from the structural loads as well as liquefaction- induced settlement; the liquefaction- induced settlements are significantly higher than what we would anticipate for the static slab settlement and would therefore control the design. We estimate, during a 500 -year design earthquake, that the liquefaction- induced settlement could be on the order of half a foot to a foot. Differential settlements over a 20 -foot span may be about 50 to 75 percent of the total settlement. Major ground improvement, such as through the use of stone columns, would be required to mitigate liquefaction- induced settlements. New and existing slabs -on -grade may behave differently during a design seismic event due to potentially different subgrade preparation techniques used, slab age, etc. Differential settlement should be expected between the floor slabs in the existing museum and those newly constructed for the expansion. 7.7 Flexible Asphalt Pavements Pavement recommendations for flexible asphalt pavements were developed for areas designated as AC PVMT Type I and AC PVMT Type II on drawings C101 and C221, dated September 14, 2001, provided to us by SWMB. According to handwritten notes on these drawings by SWMB, AC PVMT Type I indicates areas where the design vehicle is an HS -20. AC PVMT Type II includes areas that will be traveled by HS -20 type vehicles and wide -body aircraft (up to B -737- 900) during ceremonial rollouts. Design pavement sections for the AC PVMT Type I area were developed using American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) procedures. For the areas that will accommodate aircraft movements, the pavement section was designed using the computer program LEDFAA- Layered Elastic Airport Pavement Design, which generally 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 16 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON 61/ASON, INC. incorporates (with some modifications) the requirements of FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5320 -6D. Details of the two design methods, the subgrade strength, traffic loads, and the recommended pavement sections are discussed below. 7.7.1 Design Approaches 7.7.1.1 AASHTO Design Method The recommended asphalt pavement design thicknesses presented in this report for AC PVMT Type I areas are based on the AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993). The procedure recommended by AASHTO for design of flexible pavements is based on the results of an extensive AASHTO road test conducted in the late 1950s and early 1960s. This road test introduced the concept of functional failure of a roadway. Such a failure is defined to occur when the roadway cannot carry traffic safely and smoothly from one point to another. The AASHTO procedure represents the damaging effect of the passing of an axle of any weight by a number of 18 -kip equivalent single axle loads (ESALs). To convert a mixed traffic stream into ESALs, load equivalency factors (ELAFs) are approximated for each vehicle type. To quantify the functional description of a roadway, serviceability and performance factors were introduced into the design procedure. The serviceability factor "p" is a measure of how well a road is serving its intended function at a particular point in time. It ranges between 0 (very bad) and 5 (excellent). Performance is the ability of a pavement to satisfactorily serve traffic over a period of time. Variances associated with the performance of the pavement design and with the predicted traffic volume are represented in the design analysis by an estimated overall standard deviation value, "So." The AASHTO method also requires identifying an appropriate design reliability level "R" for a roadway. This reliability level depends primarily on the projected level of usage and the consequences associated, for example, with basing the pavement design on a low initial cost and high future maintenance (thinner pavement thickness). The following table provides AASHTO's recommended reliability levels for various functional classifications: 21-1-09383-001 .r l .doc /wp /eet 17 21 -1- 09383 -001 S NON 8WILSON, INC. Functional Classification Recommended Level of Reliability '(%).. .- Urban Rural Interstate and Other Freeways 85 - 99.9 80 - 99.9 Principal Arterials 80 — 99 75 — 95 Collectors 80 — 95 75 — 95 Local 50 — 80 50 — 80 The AASHTO methods treat drainage of a pavement section by considering the effect of water on the properties of the pavement layers and the consequences to the structural capacity of the pavement: This effect is represented in the design by applying modified layer coefficients "m" to the untreated base and subbase materials of the flexible pavement. These "m" coefficients are functions of the quality of drainage and the percent of time during the year the pavement structure would normally be exposed to moisture levels approaching saturation. In addition to these factors, the AASHTO design procedure incorporates the effects of the traffic, construction materials, and subgrade soils, which are discussed in later sections. 7.7.1.2 FAA Design Method For AC PVMT Type II areas, the design pavement sections were developed using the program LEDFAA- Layered Elastic Airport Pavement Design (FAA, 1995). The program implements layered elastic theory based design procedures developed under the sponsorship of the FAA as well as incorporates empirical design methods. The required inputs to the program include the aircraft mix (type of aircraft, gross weight, annual departures, tire and gear spacing, tire pressure); the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of the subgrade soil; and the resilient moduli (MR) of the asphalt concrete, crushed aggregate base, and uncrushed aggregate subbase. Details of the subgrade properties, pavement properties, and aircraft mix are presented in the following sections. References for specific details of the LEDFAA design procedures include Barker and Brabston, 1975 and Barker and Gonzalez, 1991. 7.7.2 Subgrade Strength The subgrade strength at the proposed Museum of Flight Expansion site was estimated from non - destructive strength testing using a Heavy Falling Weight Deflectometer (HWD). 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 18 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON t)N iyJd WON„ iNC. Pavement Consultants, Inc. conducted the HWD measurements at the site on May 18, 2001. A report showing the test location points and a summary the results by Pavement Consultants Inc. is included in Appendix D. The deflections measured during the HWD testing were used by Pavement Consultants to backcalculate the resilient modulus (MR) of the subgrade soils. These backcalculations were made using the computer program ELMOD based on the deflection basin measured in the field from the HWD test and the measured asphalt layer thickness. Because of the large number of tests and expected variability in the test data, design values for a specific area are commonly determined from the mean of the measurements minus one standard deviation. The mean MR of the existing (unimproved) subgrade soils is about 8,700 psi. An MR of 6,800 psi was assigned to the unimproved subgrade materials, representative of the mean minus one standard deviation value. However we assumed in our analyses using the AASHTO design method that the subgrade soils would be prepared, as described in Section 7.10 to achieve a higher level of strength with an MR of 10,000 psi. For the FAA design method, subgrade strength is represented by the California Bearing Ratio (CBR). CBR may be estimated from the MR from the following relationship: CBR =MR /1500 Based on the MR derived from the HWD measurements, a CBR value of 4.5 was assigned to the unimproved subgrade materials, representative of the mean minus one standard deviation value. However, we assumed in our analyses using the FAA design method that the subgrade soils would be prepared, as described in Section 7.10, to achieve a higher level of strength with a CBR value of 6.7. 7.7.3 Aircraft and Vehicular Traffic Loads Estimates of aircraft and vehicular traffic loads were provided to us by SWMB and a report by David I. Hamlin and Associates (2001), respectively. For the AC PVMT Type I area, the design vehicles include school buses, tour coaches, and automobiles. Based on the drawings provided by SWMB, it appears that there are areas of AC PVMT Type I that will be primarily traversed by autos, while other areas (e.g. drop -off area) will primarily accommodate buses. Thus we developed pavement design recommendations for 2 cases: predominantly auto traffic 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 19 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON ENVLSON, INC. or predominantly bus traffic. We assumed the following vehicles, number of trips, and axle loads: ASSUMED TRAFFIC LOADING FOR AC PVMT TYPE I AREAS 'arc.. *' `- ;-Vehicle.Type ° sj, 4 .__. 'Axle Load* • ' •.`(kips) . ._. . ♦� Axle Type - (sm le'or., . tandem) Number of trips 'per day ** . ':. (auto'onl areas . Number of trips:,. er da ** (bus onlyrareas)'° Passenger cars 2 (front) 3 (rear) Single 3067 0 35 -ft school bus (full) 12.5 (front) 22 (rear) Single 2 32 40 -ft. tour bus (full) 12.4 (front) 22.6 (rear) Single 0 31 * Axle loads estimated by Shannon & Wilson, Inc. from published sources. ** The number of trips per day is based on future estimated total vehicles during peak season by David I. Hamlin and Associates (2001). We averaged Hamlin's daily and Saturday estimates for a total of 3130 vehicles per day. Hamlin's report also estimates that 75 percent of attendees arrive by car, with the remaining arriving by bus. Assuming 3 persons per car and 50 persons per bus results in 3067 cars and 63 buses. We assumed that the bus traffic is evenly divided between school buses and tour buses. A growth factor of one percent per year was assumed. In addition, we assumed that 100 percent of the traffic is repeated upon a given spot on the pavement in each bus or auto area. For the AC PVMT Type II areas, we assumed the following mix of traffic based on general information provided by SWMB: ASSUMED TRAFFIC LOADING FOR AC PVMT TYPE II AREAS <x � 3 Aircraft Type Gross's =weight *• (kips). a e. Annual ' , Departures Boeing 707 305 2 Boeing 727 156 2 Boeing 737 -100 85 2 Boeing 737 -900 150 10 Concorde 395 2 ** * Calculated from maximum taxi weight minus weight of full load of passengers ** Pavement design performed with and without the Concorde A growth factor of zero percent was assumed. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 20 21 -1- 09383 -001 SI-IANNON WILSON. INC. 7.7.4 Pavement Design Sections The life of a pavement depends on many factors including the maintenance undertaken. Even if the asphalt section is constructed as recommended below, routine maintenance will be required after the pavement is placed. Such maintenance should include sealing pavement cracks as soon as possible after observation. In addition, it should be anticipated that a general sealing will be required after a few years of service. 7.7.4.1 AC PVMT Type I Areas Listed below are the parameters used in our pavement design analyses using the AASHTO method. AASHTO Input Estiinated Value 20 year Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ES AL) 140,000 (auto only areas) 1.2 million (bus only areas) Serviceability factors 4.2 at beginning of life cycle 3 at end of life cycle Standard deviation So 0.45 Reliability Level, R 85% Modified Layer Coefficient, m 1.0 for base and subbase courses Subgrade strength prepared according to Section 7.10 MR = 10 ksi CBR = 6.7 Unimproved subgrade MR = 6.8 ksi CBR = 4.5 Asphalt Concrete 450 ksi Base Course 30 ksi Subbase 18 ksi Based on the input parameters described above and the methodology presented in the AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (1993), our recommended flexible (asphalt concrete) pavement sections for the AC PVMT Type I areas are as follows: RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT THICKNESS FOR AC PVMT TYPE I AREAS Material Layer Thickness for Auto only . areas (inches) Layer Thickness. for Bus only ' " areas (inches) WSDOT Standard "'. Specification ., Asphalt Concrete 3 5 5 -04.2, Class B Crushed Rock Base 6.5 6 9- 03.9(3) Subbase 0 2 '9- 03.14(1) 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 21 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON 6\MLSQN9, INC. Pavement construction, including asphalt concrete, lift thickness and compaction requirements, should conform to Section 5 -04 of the WSDOT Standard Specifications. 7.7.4.2 AC PVMT Type II Areas Listed below are the material pavement design parameters used in the FAA analysis method. FAA Input Estimated Value P -401 AC Surface* MR = 200 ksi P -209 Crushed Aggregate* 63 ksi P -154 Uncrushed aggregate* 21.4 ksi Subgrade MR = 10 ksi CBR = 6.7 Poisson's ratio (all materials) 0.35 * MR values specified by LEDFAA program and are not changeable. Based on the aircraft input parameters described above and the methodology presented in the FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5320 -6D (1995), our recommended flexible (asphalt concrete) pavement sections for the AC PVMT Type II areas for a design life of 20 years are as follows: RECOMMENDED PAVEMENT THICKNESS FOR AC PVMT TYPE II AREAS ,,a• a r... _ }. r ~Material ; Layer • . Thickness ' [includes Concorde]. (inches) Layer Thickness [without Concorde] (inches) FAA Specification WSDOT Standard * Specification Equivalent Asphalt Concrete 4 4 P -401 Plant Mix Bituminous Pavements No equivalent for bituminous materials, mix design, and construction For aggregate only, WSDOT Class A is a suitable equivalent Crushed Rock Base 12 12 P -209 Crushed aggregate 9- 03.9(3) Subbase 13 7 P -154 Uncrushed aggregate 9- 03.14(1) 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 22 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWILSO N. INC. 7.7.5 Frost Protection Frost - susceptible soil is generally regarded as having greater than 3 percent finer than 0.02 mm. Soil with a fines content not exceeding 7 percent passing the No. 200 sieve, based on the minus 3/4 -inch fraction , can normally be expected to have 3 percent or less finer than 0.02 mm. Any fines should be nonplastic. Crushed rock material with less than 10 percent nonplastic fines are also usually non - frost - susceptible. Based on the grain -size analyses, presented in Appendix B, it is our opinion that the existing on -site native soil is frost - susceptible. According to the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Pavement Guide (1995), the maximum frost depth in the Seattle and Tacoma area in fine - grained soil is about 10 to 12 inches. Pavement can be designed for complete frost protection by providing a pavement section that is equal to, or thicker than the maximum anticipated frost depth. The pavement section includes asphalt concrete and non - frost - susceptible base and subbase materials. Alternatively, limited subgrade frost protection can be provided with a sufficient pavement section thickness to restrict surface deformation to an acceptable value with a thaw weakened subgrade. WSDOT requires that the total depth of pavement structure equal one -half the expected depth of frost to limit surface deformation. The recommended pavement sections for the AC PVMT Type II areas and the AC PVMT Type I bus traffic areas presented above account for complete frost protection, i.e. the total pavement section thickness equals or is thicker than the anticipated maximum frost depth of 12 inches. The recommended pavement section for the AC PVMT Type I auto traffic only areas will not provide complete frost protection; however, they meet or exceed the WSDOT criterion of total pavement thickness equal to one -half of the expected frost depth. If this alternative is selected for the auto traffic only areas, the reliability expected following long periods of freezing weather should be evaluated. Thicker sections could be built with additional subbase material if increased or total frost protection is desired. In our opinion, the recommended pavement sections should not freeze except during an exceptionally cold winter. If an extremely cold winter occurs, limiting heavy traffic during the thawing period could reduce frost damage. Light traffic from passenger vehicles probably would not damage the pavements during the thawing period. 21 -1- 093 83 -001. r l . doc /wp /eet 23 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON J`if‘JdLSON, INC. 7.8 Permanent Groundwater and Surface Water Drainage and Control At the Commercial Gallery no underslab or perimeter drains are required because the area will be at or above the surrounding grade. In the Military Gallery and Red Barn Enclosure where below -grade levels are planned, perimeter foundation drains will be required. The underslab drainage layer must be hydraulically connected to the drains to reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressure below the slab. This approach is apparently the same as at the existing Red Barn and Great Gallery. We understand sump pumps at each facility cycle to remove accumulated water, but we do not know the flow rates or cycling frequency. We have some information, but it is not from the wet season. The floor slabs in these areas are close to, if not just below, the groundwater level. To control surface water, provisions should be made to direct it away from structures and prevent it from seeping into the ground adjacent to the structures or excavations. The ground surface should be sloped away and surface and downspout water should not be introduced into site backfill. Surface water should be collected in catch basins, and, along with downspout water, should be conveyed in a nonperforated pipe (tightline) into an approved discharge point. 7.9 Backfill Material, Placement, and Compaction All fill placed beneath areas to be paved or against below grade walls (building or retaining walls) or other foundation elements should consist of structural fill. Structural fill should be placed on subgrade material that has been proof - rolled to a dense, unyielding condition. Structural fill should meet the Washington State Department of Transportation specification for Gravel Borrow (Section 9 -03.14 (1)) but should have a maximum particle size of about 3 inches. During wet weather or wet conditions it should not contain more than about 5 percent fines (material passing the No. 200 mesh sieve) by weight, based on the minus 3/4 -inch soil fraction. - Structural fill should not contain organics or deleterious material. It should be placed in horizontal lifts and compacted to at least 95 percent of its Modified Proctor maximum dry density (American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM] D 1557, Method C or D), and should be deemed to be in a dense and unyielding condition. The thickness of loose lifts should not exceed 8 inches for heavy equipment compactors, and 4 inches for hand - operated compactors. In landscaping areas, the backfill should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 24 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON 6W1LSON, INC. All utility trenches beneath flexible asphalt pavements and sidewalks should also be backfilled with Gravel Borrow; however, it should have a maximum diameter of 2 inches and should not have more than 5 percent passing the No. 200 sieve (wet sieve analysis, ASTM D 1140). Any fines should be nonplastic. The trench backfill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 4 inches if compacted with hand - operated equipment or 8 inches if compacted with heavy equipment. Each lift should be compacted to a dense, unyielding condition and to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) 18 inches or more below the pavement and/or sidewalk subgrade. We recommend a minimum cover over utilities of 2 feet from the crown of the pipes or conduits to the top pf the pavement subgrade. Catch basins, utility vaults, and other structures installed flush with the pavement should be designed and constructed to transfer wheel loads to the base of the structure. Subgrade preparation for new utilities should follow the same general procedures outlined for asphalt pavement. We recommend that retaining and basement walls be backfilled with free - draining soils and that backfill for basement walls be connected hydraulically to perimeter drains. The ground surface should be sloped away from the buildings to prevent ponding against them. Our recommendations for drainage behind permanent basement walls and retaining walls are presented in Figure 9. These recommendations include compaction criteria and gradation requirements of drainage materials. In our opinion, some of the fill soil at the site may be suitable for re -use as structural fill providing the moisture content is sufficiently close to optimum and work is conducted under dry conditions. Otherwise the silt content would render it unsuitable for use as structural fill. However, separating out the reusable material from the unsuitable material may be difficult. 7.10 Site Grading, Excavation, and Temporary Cut Slopes 7.10.1 Site Preparation We recommend that retaining wall footings founded on existing fill subgrades be prepared as follows: ► Compact the upper 1.5 feet of exposed subgrade with heavy vibrating drum rollers (or equivalent) to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 25 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WWILSON, INC. ► Remove any soft/loose zones noted during rolling and replace those areas with structural fill material placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 7.9. A geotechnical engineer should observe the soft/loose zones to determine the extent of overexcavation required. We recommend preparing the subgrade for flexible asphalt pavement that will be constructed adjacent to the Museum of Flight Expansion as follows: ► Compact the upper 18 inches of soil with heavy vibrating drum rollers (or equivalent) to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) 18 inches or more below the subgrade. This level of compactive effort should result in improved subgrade conditions below 18 inches, as assumed in our pavement calculations. ► Remove any soft/loose zones noted during rolling and replace those areas with structural fill material constructed in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 7.9. These soft/loose zones should be observed by a geotechnical engineer. For estimating purposes, the owner should anticipate that a maximum overexcavation of 18 inches could be necessary at any soft/loose area. ► Place and compact base course material that meets the requirements of WSDOT Standard Specification 9- 03.9(3). The on -site base course material could be tested to determine if it meets the WSDOT requirements. The base course material should be placed and spread in accordance with WSDOT Standard Specification 4 -04. The base course should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). For the Museum of Flight Expansion we recommend the following subgrade preparation for rigid concrete slabs -on- grade: ► Remove material from the building footprint to establish the required subgrade elevation. ► Compact the exposed upper 1.5 feet of soil with heavy vibrating drum rollers (or equivalent) to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557) 18 inches or more below the subgrade. To effectively use heavy compaction equipment, dewatering to 5 feet or more below the compacted surface may be required. ► Remove any soft/loose zones noted during rolling and replace those areas with structural fill material constructed in accordance with the recommendations presented in Section 7.9. These soft/loose zones should be observed by a geotechnical engineer. ► At the Commercial Gallery, where fill is required to achieve the final grade, first break up and then compact the existing asphalt pavement before placing new fill, but removal of the asphalt is not required. ► Place densely compacted, free - draining, well - graded, imported sand and crushed gravel or clean, crushed rock fill in the upper 18 inches beneath the proposed vapor barrier to increase the subgrade modulus of the subgrade. If used to provide a capillary break and 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 26 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON Z, WILSON, INC. drainage layer, the upper 6 inches of the fill material should have less than 3 percent fines passing the No. 200 sieve by wet sieving of the minus 3/4-inch fraction, and should have a maximum size of 4 inches. Compact all structural fill to at least 95 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum dry density. • Install a vapor barrier — if a crushed rock capillary break is used, the vapor barrier may have to be thicker than it would be for a sand and gravel capillary break in order to resist puncture and/or tearing. ► Place an additional 6 inches of capillary break material on top of the vapor barrier (per Sellen Construction). The design civil engineer should determine if sand for concrete curing is required between the vapor barrier /upper capillary break and the concrete slab. We recommend that the external grade be sloped away from the structure. 7.10.2 Excavation and Temporary Groundwater Control The top of slab elevation for the Military Gallery area is 12.4 feet. Excavation to about elevation 10.5 feet will be required in the slab areas. Excavations of about 9 to 11 feet will likely be required to reach the bottom of the deepest pile caps, to elevation 6 to 8 feet. The deeper excavations will probably encounter groundwater, and sumps or well points will be needed to control the groundwater and allow for an accessible excavation. In addition, residual soil contamination may affect groundwater quality and disposal alternatives. As mentioned above, slab subgrade preparation would require dewatering to 5 feet below the compacted surface. Throughout the excavated areas, the on -site soil contains enough fine - grained material to make it moisture sensitive; therefore, control of surface and groundwater will be necessary to maintain the desirable dense nature of the material and a firm working platform. Lean concrete or control density fill may be placed beneath the proposed pile cap to provide a stable working surface or as backfill to replace unsuitable exposed soil. The contractor should be responsible for the control of ground and surface water within the contract limits, but we should review all dewatering plans in the context of continued existing facility stability. Deeper dewatering efforts adjacent to existing slabs -on -grade may cause slab settlement; the proposed dewatering plan should include a slab monitoring program. In this regard, sloping, slope protection, ditching, sumps, dewatering, and other measures should direct water away from the structures and parking lots to prevent ponding of water next to these facilities. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 27 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWiLSON. 1NC. 7.10.3 General Excavation and Temporary Cut Slopes For safe working conditions and prevention of ground loss, excavation slopes should be the responsibility of the contractor because he /she will be at the job site to observe and control the work. All current and applicable safety regulations regarding excavation slopes and shoring should be followed. Note that some area excavation will be governed by the site environmental requirements. We can work with those requirements to ensure that the environmental and geotechnical needs do not conflict and that unnecessary dollars are not spent. At all times during excavation, the contractor will need to be prepared to segregate any soils suspected of containing contaminants. Excavations can be accomplished with conventional excavating equipment, such as a dozer, front -end loader, or backhoe. For planning purposes, we recommend that temporary unsupported open cut slopes be no steeper than 1.5 Horizontal to 1 Vertical (1.5H:1V) in the near - surface fill soils. Flatter cut slopes may be required where loose soils or seepage zones are encountered. We recommend that all exposed cut slopes be protected with a waterproof covering during periods of wet weather to reduce sloughing and erosion. We understand that temporary shoring will not be used and that all excavations will be made with cut slopes. Excavated material (or stockpiles of construction materials or equipment) should not be placed closer to the edge of any excavation than the depth of the excavation, unless the excavation is shored and such materials are accounted for as a surcharge load on the shoring system. 8.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 8.1 Driven Pile Installation 8.1.1 Pile Driving Equipment An air -, steam -, or diesel - powered hammer may be used for driving the proposed piles. All pile- driving equipment should be designed, constructed, and maintained in a manner suitable for the work to be accomplished for this project. If, in the opinion of the owner, the driving equipment is inadequate or deficient, the owner may direct that it be removed from the job site. All costs for re- mobilizing, removing, or replacing such equipment should be at the contractor's expense. The contractor should furnish the manufacturer's specifications and catalog for the 21 -1- 09383 -001.r 1.doc /wp /eet 28 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON 'S\1 LSON. INC. hammer proposed. As a minimum, the contractor should furnish the information required on the Pile and Driving Equipment Data sheet, shown on Table 2, seven days in advance of the scheduled pile driving. 8.1.2 Pile Driving Conditions In our opinion, pile installation for the proposed structures would encounter moderate driving conditions in the upper sand materials, very soft driving conditions in the soft clayey silt deposits, and moderate to hard driving conditions in the bearing sand layer. The soft driving conditions through the clayey silt deposits may result in high tensile stresses in the piles, which would be a concern for prestressed concrete piles. To minimize the possibility of damage to prestressed concrete piles during soft driving conditions, we recommend they be driven with a hammer that allows variable energy settings, such as diesel hammers or hydraulic hammers. Low energy should be used to drive the prestressed concrete piles through the clayey silt deposits. The energy could be increased to drive the piles into the dense bearing sand deposits. 8.1.3 Wave Equation Analysis To establish driving criteria for pile installation, we recommend the Wave Equation Analyses for Pile driving (WEAP) be performed. This method allows evaluation of driving stresses so that an appropriate pile- driving hammer size can be selected to obtain the desired pile capacity without damaging the piles. This analysis also provides an estimate of the ultimate pile capacity for a given driving resistance. Typically, an FS of 2.0 is applied to the WEAP analysis, with test pile confirmation. We recommend that all piles be driven to the estimated pile tip elevations and to the required final driving resistance for the last foot as determined by WEAP. In the event the pile driving resistances are less than the minimum values obtained from WEAP under continuous driving conditions, as they approach the minimum penetration depths, the contractor should continue driving the piles until they reach the required driving resistances, except that the pile driving should stop when the piles are 6 inches above the final cutoff elevations. For these piles, pile driving should be discontinued for a minimum of 24 hours and then redriven for 6 inches or less penetration, recording the blows for each inch of penetration. The acceptable redrive resistance should be twice the specified minimum driving resistance. If the restrike resistances do not meet the specified values, the engineer will determine the acceptability of the piles and the subsequent procedures to be taken. 21 -1- 09383 -001.r 1.doc /wp /eet 29 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON VV LEON. INC. Should the required minimum driving resistance be achieved before piles reach the estimated tip penetrations, the piles should be driven to "refusal." We can estimate "refusal" driving with WEAP. In order to avoid over - stressing the pile section for refusal conditions, a higher yield strength steel (greater than 36 kips per square inch) may be necessary. WEAP can determine the pile stresses due to pile driving. 8.1.4 Monitoring Pile Driving Shannon & Wilson personnel should observe all pile driving by taking a continuous driving record of each pile. For this purpose, the contractor should be required to mark the pile in 1 -foot increments. During restrike, additional 1 -inch increments between the 1 -foot marks would be required. The pile- driving record will include hammer stroke (diesel hammers), blows per foot, time, date, reasons for delays, and other pertinent information. In addition, the record will include tip elevation, specified criteria, and the initials of inspectors making final acceptance of the pile. The pile- driving records should be reviewed on a daily basis. It is often difficult to estimate visually the energy delivered by diesel hammers. The Saximeter, developed by Pile Dynamic, Inc., can be used to record hammer strokes and provide an estimate of the driving energy of diesel hammers. If the contractor selects a diesel hammer, we recommend that a Saximeter be used during pile driving. 8.1.5 Pile Driving Vibrations, Movement Monitoring, and Noise Levels There is often a potential for damage to existing nearby structures and utilities due to vibrations caused by pile driving operations. For this site, there is some risk to shallow adjacent utilities and existing piles. If the piles are within 10 feet of existing utilities or structures, we should develop and implement pile driving vibration criteria for those existing structures and utilities. The criteria should consider the type and frequency of the vibrations, the structural design and existing condition of the structure, and the vibration effects on people. Particle velocities can easily be measured during construction using a vibration monitor (seismograph) at the nearby structures, utilities, and at any other critical facilities. Depending on the allowable vibration levels established for each existing structure and utility located in the project vicinity, we recommend that existing structural condition surveys be 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 30 21 -1- 09383 -001 'SHANNON WILSON, INC. performed for facilities located within 50 feet of the pile driving activities. Documentation should include photographs, videos, sketches, and/or written comments. We could recommend vibration threshold values as the design progresses. If there are any cracks in the existing structures, we recommend that crack gages be installed on each crack to measure potential changes in crack widths. The aforementioned measurements, existing structural condition surveys, and crack gage installations should be established well in advance of construction so that a set of baseline data can be developed. This information will be invaluable in assessing the need for mitigating measures, as well as resolving potential disputes. We recommend that horizontal and vertical movement monitoring be performed on the existing structures, adjacent utilities, pavements, and other movement - sensitive facilities. We further recommend that the monitoring be set up prior to start of construction and continued during pile driving and excavation. If recorded movements are higher than the established limits, alternate construction methods should be utilized. Noise levels during pile driving may be unpleasant to humans nearby but are not likely to cause damage. The noise levels can be moderated during pile driving with various damping techniques. 8.2 Augercast Concrete Pile Installation Careful installation is critical to the success of long and large diameter augercast piles. Augercast concrete piles are installed by rotating a continuous - flight, hollow -stem auger to a predetermined depth. After the auger is rotated to the predetermined depth, a high- strength, sand - cement grout is pumped under controlled pressure through the center of the shaft as the auger is slowly withdrawn. By maintaining pressure in the grout line and extracting the auger no faster than an equivalent volume of grout is pumped, a continuous column of concrete is formed. A single reinforcing rod can be placed through the hollow -stem of the auger and/or a reinforcing cage with centering guides can be placed in the column of wet grout. Where piles are expected to experience tensile /uplift forces, the central reinforcing rod should be extended for the full length of the pile. The quality of the augercast concrete piles depends on the procedure and workmanship of the contractor who installs them. We recommend that Shannon & Wilson personnel observe the 21 -1 -093 83 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 31 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON bWILSON, INC. installation of augercast piles on a full -time basis to evaluate the adequacy of the construction. procedures. We recommend that the contract documents require the contractor to install a pressure gage on the pump discharge line and a counter on the grout pump. The approximate volume of grout pumped is computed by counting the number of strokes of a displacement -type grout pump. The pressure gage is used to monitor the pressure of the grout to evaluate the rate at which the auger should be extracted, and to check if the auger or hoses are plugged. If insufficient grout is pumped into the auger, a proper grout column will not be formed. If the pressure in the grout line is not maintained, or if the auger is withdrawn too rapidly, the auger hole may cave, creating a discontinuity in the grout column. Either condition will reduce the load - carrying capacity of the pile. Therefore, the pump should be calibrated in the presence of the geotechnical engineer prior to its use, and the pressure gage should be checked for proper functioning. The auger should not be pulled until the grout has been pumped at least 5 feet above the auger tip. It should then be withdrawn with slow, positive rotation at a slow, continuous, steady pull. The 5 -foot head of grout should be maintained at all times during the withdrawal operations. The contractor should be required to establish accurate methods of determining the depth of the auger at all times. We recommend that the leads be marked at 1 -foot intervals. The ratio between the volume of grout pumped and theoretical volume of each augercast pile hole should be at least 1.10. Based on experience with similar projects, grout takes could be large, being on the order of 25 to 35 percent more than the total net pile volume. If contaminated soil or groundwater is encountered during the augercast pile installation, the drilling spoils should be separated out, placed on plastic sheeting, and covered until environmental testing is completed and a suitable disposal location can be determined. 8.3 Test Pile Program The preliminary recommendations for pile foundations and, in particular, the recommendations for pile penetrations and capacities are based on theoretical and empirical data, subsurface conditions encountered at the site, and our engineering judgment and experience. In order to substantiate our recommendations and justify the relatively low safety factors and high allowable seismic capacities, we recommend that a test pile program be undertaken. The test pile program could be completed either during the design phase or during construction prior to production pile 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 32 21 -1- 09383 -001 ',:;]-11ANNON ENVLSON, iNG. installation. If the program is completed during the design phase it will allow any necessary adjustments to pile size and/or length to be made prior to ordering the production piles. If the program is completed during construction, its purpose would be to confirm the design pile capacities. The test pile program could consist of one of the following options: ► For driven steel pipe and/or pre- stressed octagonal concrete pile, we recommend driving indicator piles and performing dynamic pile tests using a Pile- Driving Analyzer (PDA). We recommend that a minimum of three piles be driven as indicator piles. The indicator piles should be driven at appropriate locations within the footprint of the enclosed area south of the Red Barn, the Military Gallery and the Commercial Gallery. During the indicator pile driving, we recommend that dynamic measurements, using a PDA, be taken and Case Pile Wave Analysis Program (CAPWAP) be performed on each test pile. We recommend that a CAPWAP restrike be taken on all three test piles after an appropriate setup time has passed. Based on our experience, dynamic pile tests are one of the most cost - effective methods for determining the total ultimate capacities and load distribution of the piles. Test piles may be used as production piles if they meet the specified installation procedures and requirements. ► For augercast concrete or either driven pile, we recommend performing static load tests. Pile load tests yield accurate load deflection relationships and would probably result in a higher pile design capacity. We recommend that a minimum of three static load tests be performed for the proposed expansion, one in the enclosed area south of the Red Barn, one in the Military Gallery, and one in the Commercial Gallery. Each load test setup would consist of both test and reaction piles. We recommend that an oversized casing be installed down to the top of the bearing layer and cleaned out (for driven piles). The test pile would be installed within the casing and into the bearing layer. This setup would allow the end bearing of the test pile to be adequately evaluated without the interference of significant side friction within the upper, potentially liquefiable soils. We further recommend that the load test pile be performed in general accordance with "Quick Test" in the ASTM D -1143 guidelines. Pile driving vibrations should be monitored during test pile installations. In addition to the test pile program, we also recommend that dynamic measurements be performed on at least five percent of the production piles and on production piles with questionable driving results. Such measurements would help evaluate the integrity of the driven piles, the adequacy of the pile driving criteria, confirm the capacity of the piles, adjust the pile driving equipment if required, and alter the pile installation techniques or the pile driving criteria, if necessary. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl.doc /wp /eet 33 21 -1- 09383 -001 S \INoN 'WILSON. INC. 8.4 Wet Weather Earthwork In this area, wet weather generally begins in October and continues through about May, although rainy periods may occur at any time of the year. Earthwork performed during the wet weather months will cost more and take longer to complete. Groundwater levels will also be higher during the rainy season, although significant variations are not expected. Groundwater and surface water runoff could enter into site excavations and would need to be intercepted by drainage ditches, trench drains, or otherwise removed. The soils at the site generally contain sufficient silt to produce an unstable mixture when wet. Such soils are susceptible to softening when wet. Standing water on the soil surface, along with construction activity, will result in disturbance and an unacceptable bearing surface requiring overexcavation. The following recommendations are applicable for pile caps, general excavation, floor slabs, or pavements: ► If there is to be traffic over the exposed subgrade, the subgrade should be protected from disturbance. A lean concrete pad, about 2 or 3 inches thick (a "rat slab" or "mud slab "), could be placed immediately following excavation on the undisturbed soils. This could be done as needed to protect the exposed soils and act as a working surface. Overexcavation may be needed to accommodate this lean concrete pad. ► The ground surface in the construction area should be sloped and sealed with a smooth - drum roller to promote rapid runoff of precipitation, to prevent surface water from flowing into excavations, and to prevent ponding of water. • Construction should be observed on a full -time basis by Shannon & Wilson personnel to determine that all unsuitable materials are removed and suitable drainage is achieved, and an appropriate bearing surface results. ► Covering work areas with plastic and/or sloping, ditching, pumping from sumps and other dewatering measures should be employed as necessary to permit proper completion of the work. The above recommendations apply for all weather conditions, but are most important for wet weather earthwork. They should be incorporated into the contract specifications for foundation and pavement construction. 8.5 Construction Observation We recommend that Shannon & Wilson be retained to review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to foundations, pavements, and earthwork to determine if they are 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 34 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON WI LSO N, INC. consistent with our recommendations. The specified methodology and/or performance criteria in the subgrade preparation sections will be critical to the success of the pavement construction and performance. We also recommend we be retained to observe the geotechnical aspects of construction, particularly the test pile program, pavement subgrade preparation, drainage, foundation installation, and backfill. This observation would allow us to verify the subsurface conditions as they are exposed during construction and to determine that the work is accomplished in accordance with our recommendations. 9.0 LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions, and recommendations contained in this report are based upon site conditions as they presently exist, and further assume that the explorations are representative of the subsurface conditions at the Museum of Flight Expansion project (that is, the subsurface conditions everywhere are not significantly different from those disclosed by the explorations). Within the limitations of the scope, schedule, and budget, the analyses, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering principles and practice in this area at the time this report was prepared. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. Our conclusions and recommendations were based on our understanding of the project as described in this report and the site conditions as interpreted from the explorations. If, during final design and construction, subsurface conditions different from those encountered in the field explorations are observed or appear to be present during pile installation, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. If there is substantial lapse of time between the submission of this report and the start of work at the site, or if conditions have changed due to natural causes or construction operations at or adjacent to the site, it is recommended that this report be reviewed to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations concerning the changed conditions or the time lapse. We recommend that we review those portions of the plans and specifications that pertain to deep foundation installation, pavements, drainage, and backfill to determine if they are consistent with our recommendations. 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 35 21 -1- 09383 -001 1 SHANNON EIWILSON, INC. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the Museum of Flight and their design team. It should be made available to prospective contractors for information on factual data only, and not as a warranty of subsurface conditions such as those interpreted from the exploration logs and presented in the discussions of subsurface conditions included in this report. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered and cannot fully be determined by merely by taking soil samples from test borings or pushing CPTs. Such unexpected conditions frequently require that additional expenditures be made to attain properly constructed projects. Therefore, some contingency fund is recommended to accommodate such potential extra costs. The scope of our geotechnical services did not include any environmental assessment or evaluation regarding the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air, on or below the site, or for evaluation of disposal of contaminated soils or groundwater should any be encountered, except as noted in this report. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. has prepared a document, "Important Information About Your Geotechnical Report," to assist you and others in understanding the use and limitations of our reports. This document is included in this report as Appendix E. SHANNON & WILSON, INC. EXPIRES 6/15/0 Carole L.B. Mitchell, P.E. Senior Principal Engineer ll -7 -0 ( SWC:WJP:CLBM:CAR:DGW /clbm 21 -1- 09383 -001.r 1.doc /wp /eet 36 I EXPIRES 7 — j, -02 1 David G. Winter, P.E. Vice - President 7 -a/ 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON J\MLSON, INC. 10.0 REFERENCES American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1993, Guide for design of pavement structures. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2001, Annual book of standards, Construction, v. 4.08, Soil and rock (I): D 420 - D 4914: West Conshohocken, Pa. Arduino, P., Kramer, S.L., Li, P., and Baska, D.A., 2001, Dynamic stiffness of piles in liquefiable soils, draft research report, Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, 149 pp. Barker, W.R., and Brabston, W.N., 1975, Development of a structural design procedure for flexible pavements, Report No. FAA -RD -74 -199, September. Barker, W.R., and Gonzalez, C.R., 1991, Pavement design by elastic layer theory, proceedings of the conference: Aircraft/Pavement Interaction —An Integrated System, ASCE, Kansas City, Missouri. Bartlett, S.F., and Youd, T.L., 1995, Empirical prediction of liquefaction- induced lateral spread: Journal of Geotechnical_Engineering, v. 121, no. 4, p. 316 -329. David I. Hamlin and Associates, 2001, Draft traffic impact assessment, Museum of Flight, Tukwila, Washington. EduPro Civil Systems, Inc., 1999, ProShake ground response analysis program, version 1.10: Redmond, Wash. Ensoft Inc., 1998, Design of deep foundations: piles and drilled shafts under lateral and axial loadings, a seminar /workshop featuring computer programs from Ensoft, Inc., Austin, Texas, April 23 -24, 1998: Austin, Tex. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 1995, Airport pavement design and evaluation, Advisory Circular 150/5320 -6D. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 1995, program LEDFAA, version 1.2. Frankel, A.; Mueller, C.; Barnhard, T., and others, 1996, National seismic - hazard maps, June 1996; documentation: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 96 -532. GeoEngineers, Inc., 2001, Report, Phase II environmental site assessment, 9725 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington: Report prepared by GeoEngineers, Inc., Seattle, Wash., March 12. 21 -1- 09383 -001.r l .doc /wp /eet 37 21 -1- 09383 -001 u-,l /al',I NON 2�VV' 130N, gNC. Horne, J.C., 1996, Effects of liquefaction- induced lateral spreading on file foundations, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, 371 pp. International Conference of Building Officials, 1997, Universal building code, Three - volume set, Whittier, Calif. Johnson, S.Y; Dadisman, S.V.; Childs, J.R.; and Stanley, W.D., 1999, Active tectonics of the Seattle fault and Central Puget Sound, Washington — implications for earthquake hazards in Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 111, no. 7, p. 1042 -1053, July. Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, 1979, Proposed Museum of Flight soils and foundations investigation: Letter report prepared by Neil H. Twelker & Associates, Seattle, Wash., for Ibsen Nelson, architect, June 22. Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, 1980a, Pacific Museum of Flight Phase I, Seattle, Washington, soils and foundations investigation: Letter report prepared by Neil H. Twelker & Associates, Seattle, Wash., for Ibsen Nelson and Associates, August 15. Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, 1980b, Pacific Museum of Flight Phase II, soils and foundations investigation: Letter report prepared by Neil H. Twelker & Associates, Seattle, Wash., -for Ibsen Nelson and Associates, October 31. Neil H. Twelker & Associates Consulting Soils Engineers, 1983, Pacific Museum of Flight Phase II, Seattle, Washington, soils and foundations investigation: Letter report prepared by Neil H. Twelker & Associates, Seattle, Wash., for Ibsen Nelson and Associates, August 24. Reese, L.C., and Wang, S.T., 1997, Documentation of computer program LPILEPLUS, Version 3.0: Austin, Tex., Ensoft, Inc. Shannon & Wilson, Inc., 2001, Geotechnical engineering report, airport control tower seismic upgrade, King County International Airport, Seattle, Wash. Shannon & Wilson, Inc., 2001, Geotechnical report, hangar site, Museum of Flight expansion, Tukwila, Wash. Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H.B., 1987, Evaluation of settlements in sands due to earthquake shaking: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, v. 113, no. 8, p. 861 -878. Washington State Department of Transportation and American Public Works Association, 1998, Standard specifications for road, bridge, and municipal construction (M41 -10). Washington State Department of Transportation, 1995, Pavement Guide. 21 -1- 09383- 001.rl .doc /wp /eet 38 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. TABLE 1 RECOMMENDED PARAMETERS FOR LATERAL RESISTANCE ANALYSIS USING LPILEPLUs Field Exploration Designation ept4 Reliiw Ground Surface (NO): Static Ligtief. J fiction. A igl (degrees) Static Static/Lijuef Borings B -1 and B -2 Cone Penetration Tests CPT -1 through CPT -6 0 -33 17 to -16 Sand 0 0 30 5 58 Horizoufat Modulus of Subgra Reaction (pci) 40 iquef. 4 33 - 68 -16 to -51 Sand 0 0 30 10 58 60 30 68 - 93 -51 to -76 Soft Clay 100 100 0 0 38 10 10 3 93 - 97 -76 to -80 Sand 0 0 30 30 58 30 30 97 - 120 -80 to -103 Sand 0 0 42 42 63 150 150 NOTES (1) Static = static case, Liquef = liquefied case (2) psf = pounds per square foot (3) pcf = pounds per cubic foot (4) pci = pounds per cubic inch (5) €50 = strain at one half the maximum principal stress difference (6) No group effect reductions have been considered. (7) If applicable, modifications to the curves for sloping ground conditions should be determined in accordance with the LPILEPLUs ( PP � � p-y P� g g (1997) manual. (8) Groundwater was encountered approximately 5 to 12 feet below the existing ground surface, or about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 10/8/01/21 -1- 09383- 001/LPILE final XLS -CLBM 21 -1- 09383 -001 TABLE 2 Pile and Driving Equipment Data Contract No.: . Project County' HAMMER RAM Structure Name and/or No • Pile Driving Contractor or Subcontractor (piles driven by) Manufacturer: Model* Type: Serial No • Rated Energy: @ Length of Stroke Explosive Force' (for diesel hammers) Ram Weight: Ram Length. Ram Cross Sectional Area (for diesel hammers) ANVIL (with diesel hammers) Anvil weight: CAPBLOCK PILE CAP CUSHION PILE Material: Area Thickness: Modulus of Elasticity - E. (psi) Coefficient of Restitution - e• Helmet Bonnet Anvil Block Drivehead _ — Weight Cushion Material. Area Thickness. Modulus of Elasticity - E (psi) Coefficient of Restitution - e. Type. Pile Size: Length (in leads). Diameter. Wall Thickness: Taper Material: Weight/Ft.: Design Pile Capacity. (tons) Description of Splice: Tip Treatment Description: 21 -1- 09383 -001 Date: 10 -09 -2001 Author. LR File: I: \Drafting\211 \09383 -001\21 -1 -09383 -001 Fig 1.dwg ST I CLOVERDALE • `(KS SOO 1200 S ° TREN^t 1CG0 �+ s cot, oRRO_` S HE93E;SDN r wC SCO 5 DIRECTO 4T S D1RfCT( DO OVA • ST 'S 517 5 93RD S 19STFI ST S BE 1 ST \mil h, ¢¢ 8 99TH ST ,C� S — --108 14 sir_ D ' 1` - ig 101St s� Si 3 "` r } 5 sN oz+;o� " sT'a °j �J°" °1 %° PROJECT 11. s .. • .. <'1 S 103RD , 5 1 3RD S. ��., of ��sT ,,,� LOCATION ST • 1DATH sr — slum T \S ,rS 5l .y tv S �+ 'i$ fir, .. • N < a c t- tr: ^d`f % S 107111 ST ' ig t , yl ¶CbJNTF?RdIN R GO tF Oilli. • i iom ;s y 6 ! r T, rn z S r S m t� 8 i COUMR �1U8 ? t I I� °`�= C3 S 1 12TH 112TH_ ST 117TH 0 1/4 1/2 Scale in Miles NOTE Reproduced with permission granted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS ®. This map is copyrighted by THOMAS BROS. MAPS®. It is unlawful to Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington VICINITY MAP copy or reproduce all or any part thereof, whether for personal use or October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 resale, without permission. All rights reserved. SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants CC J 0 Date: 10 -09 -2001 Flle: 1:\Drefting1211%09383 -001\21.1 -09383 -001 Flg 2.dwg PROPOSED COMMERCIAL GALLERY (WEST GALLERY) CPT Future Expansion -.4•MIMMWM.—Z Existing Boeing 2-Story Concrete Building PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROPOSED ENCLOSED AREA CPT-3 Hangar (Typ.) 0 200 400 Scale in Feet t9B -5 ® OW -2 LEGEND Boring Designation and Approximate Location Observation Well Designation and Approximate Location Cone Penetration Test (CPT) ED CPT-5 Designation and Approximate Location to Subsurface Profile Designation and Approximate Location NOTES 1. Figure based on electronic file provided by Bush, Roed & Hitchings, Inc. entitled "2001047.dwg ". 2. Hangars A and B to be relocated to Lots 13 and 14, approximately 1/3 mile north of this site (refer to geotechnical report titled "Museum of Flight Expansion, Hangar Relocation, Tukwila, Washington ", dated 6 -2001. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. 2 J 0 Dace: 10-09-2001 File: I:\Drafting1211\09383 -001 X21 -1 -09383 -001 Fig 3.dwg Approximate Elevation in Feet A 40 — 0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100 -120 CPT-5 Offset = 33 Ft N. ? B -5 Offset = 47 Ft N. 1 15 19 ___04-262001 _______ Approximate Location of Existing Boeing 2-Story Concrete Building B -2 Offset =73 Ft S. B-6 Offset = 86 Ft N. 12 — 29 04-26-2001 Loose to medium dense, dean to silty, fine to medium SAND with some dense 114 zones; wet; (Alluvium) Very loose to medium dense, intermixed silty, fine SAND and fine sandy SILT; scattered seams of soft, dayey silt; moist to wet; (Fill) Interbedded, loose to medium dense, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND, fine sandy SILT and soft, dayey SILT; wet; abundant organics; (Lacustrine and Alluvium) 7 Very soft, clayey SILT, trace ` of fine sand; wet; ( Lacustrine) ; qt (s+) 04-24 -2001 Very loose to medium dense, silty, fine SAND; wet; abundant shell fragments; (Estuarine) CPT -2 Offset = 185 Ft N. CPT-3 Offset = 29 Ft S. Approximate Limits of Red Barn Dense, slightly silty to silty SAND, trace of gravel; moist; (Fill) 7 Medium dense to very dense, trace silty to silty, fine to medium SAND, trace of gravel; wet; abundant shell fragments; (Estuarine) 0 200 200 qt (ts+) 04-24 -2001 at (w) 04- 23-2001 B -1 Offset = 0 Ft Loose, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND; wet; (Alluvium) 7 Loose to medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND, wet; (Alluvium) Soft to very soft, clayey SILT, trace of fine sand; wet; ( Lacustrine) Loose to medium dense, silty, fine to medium SAND; wet; abundant shell fragments; (Estuarine) ? M? Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT; wet; ( Lacustrine) Ai- 04-24-2001 0 100 200 0 20 40 Horizontal Scale in Feet Vertical Scale in Feet Vertical Exaggeration = 5x 40 20 0 -20 -03 a) -40 -60 -80 -100 u- c •c 0 a) w 0 E 'X 2 0_ 0_ B1 LEGEND Offset = 86 Ft S. Boring Designation Offset from Profile with Direction 33 Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows/Foot 1 50 04-262031 CPT-3 Standard Penetration Resistance in Blows/Inches Driven Osterberg Tube Sample Approximate Groundwater Level at Time of Drilling � - Approximate Groundwater Table Based on Explorations Offset = 29 Ft N. 7 Approximate Geologic Contact Approximate Contact of Bearing Layer UCCS Designation, (See Appendix A Figure A -1) Bottom of Boring Date Completed Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Designation Offset from Profile with Direction Approximate Geologic Contact Approximate Contact of Bearing Layer 200 --- Bottom of CPT at(tsf) Corrected Cone Bearing 04- 23-2001 Date Completed NOTE This subsurface profile is generalized from materials observed in soil borings and inferred from cone penetration tests. Variations may exist between profile and actual conditions. Museum of Flight Expansion 120 Tukwila, Washington GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PROFILE A -A' October 2001 21 -1 -09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and EnWronmental Consultants FIG. 3 ▪ 1.0 0 0 a) (1) 0.5 CL a) a) 0.05 0.1 0.5 PERIOD - seconds LEGEND Recommended Design Spectrum ProShake (total stress analyses) WAVE (nonlinear, effective stress analyses NOTES 1. Response spectra are from site - response analyses con- ducted for the Boeing Field Air Traffic Control Tower (approx. 1.2 miles north of the MOF) with similar subsurface conditions. 2. Response spectra represent free -field horizontal motion at the ground surface. 3. The vertical spectrum may be assumed to be two - thirds of the recommended horizontal spectrum. 1.0 5 10 — — — Nisqually BOE east component — — — Nisqually BOE north component Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington RECOMMEND DESIGN RESPONSE SPECTRUM October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnicai and Environmental Consultants FIG. 4 pilcap6p(v2)- 10/8/01- Octagonal Concrete final.xls GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PPflFII F (Based on borings B -1 & B -2) 17' 16 m -51 z O w -76' -80' -104' -110' -123' m 2 H a w a 1— w —J F. clbr 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) P1Je.Cap - - - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity • • • • • • • • • • 4N 0 50 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of -safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -40 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 150 200 251 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 24 -INCH OCTAGONAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 5 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Liquefiable, loose to medium dense SAND Loose to dense SAND (liquefiable with residual strength) Very soft, clayey SILT Medium dense SAND y Dense to very dense SAND Bottom of boring B -1 Thickness of layer (KC tower boring) Stiff to very stiff, slightly clayey, sandy SILT (KC tower boring) m 2 H a w a 1— w —J F. clbr 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) P1Je.Cap - - - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity • • • • • • • • • • 4N 0 50 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of -safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -40 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 150 200 251 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 24 -INCH OCTAGONAL PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 5 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants pilcap6p(v2)- 10/8/01 -Pipe Pile final.xls clb GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PPfFII F (Based on borings B -1 & B -2) 17' -16 -76' -80' -104' -110' -123' PILE TIP DEPTH (feet) 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity 0 50 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -35 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 150 200 250 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 24- INCH - DIAMETER CLOSED -END PIPE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 6 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Liquefiable, loose to medium dense SAND Loose to dense SAND (liquefiable with residual strength) Very soft, clayey SILT Medium dense SAND 7 Dense to very dense SAND Bottom of boring B -1 Thickness of layer (KC tower boring) Stiff to very stiff, slightly clayey, sandy SILT (KC tower boring) PILE TIP DEPTH (feet) 0 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity 0 50 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -35 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 150 200 250 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 24- INCH - DIAMETER CLOSED -END PIPE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 6 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants pilcap6p(v2)- 10/8/01 -Pipe Pile 18 inch final.xls GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE pRnFll F (Based on borings B -1 & B -2) 17' -16' -76' -80' -104' -110' -123 PILE TIP DEPTH (feet) cIbr' 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity 0 20 40 60 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -25 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 80 100 120 140 160 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 18- INCH - DIAMETER CLOSED -END PIPE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 7 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Liquefiable, loose to medium dense SAND Loose to dense SAND (liquefiable with residual strength) Very soft, clayey SILT Medium dense SAND V Dense to very dense SAND Bottom of boring B -1 Thickness of layer (KC tower boring) Stiff to very stiff, slightly clayey, sandy SILT (KC tower boring) PILE TIP DEPTH (feet) cIbr' 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL PILE CAPACITY (tons) - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity 0 20 40 60 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor -of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction and end bearing values. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -25 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 80 100 120 140 160 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 18- INCH - DIAMETER CLOSED -END PIPE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 7 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants pilcap6p(v2)- 10 /8 /01- Augercast Concrete final.xls GENERALIZED SUBSURFACE PP(WII P (Based on borings B -1 & B -2) 17' 16' m -51' z 0 a J w 76' -80' -104' -110' -123' nitro 20 40 4-. w 60 2 H w L11 Q 80 CO H LL 2 U) 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL SHAFT CAPACITY (tons) - - - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity • • • 0 20 40 60 80 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor - of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction to obtain the allowable skin friction. The allowable end bearing was obtained by estimating the percentage of the ultimate end bearing that would be mobilized by 1/2 inch of settlement at the base of the pile. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -15 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 120 Museum of Flight, Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 18- INCH - DIAMETER AUGERCAST CONCRETE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 8 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Liquefiable, loose to medium dense SAND Loose to dense SAND (liquefiable with residual strength) Very soft, clayey SILT Medium dense x SAND V Dense to very dense SAND Bottom of boring B -1 Thickness of layer (KC tower boring) Stiff to very stiff, slightly clayey, sandy SILT (KC tower boring) nitro 20 40 4-. w 60 2 H w L11 Q 80 CO H LL 2 U) 100 120 140 ESTIMATED AXIAL SHAFT CAPACITY (tons) - - - Ultimate Uplift Resistance Allowable Total Capacity • • • 0 20 40 60 80 100 NOTES 1. Allowable compressive capacity is a summation of allowable skin friction and allowable end bearing. A factor - of- safety (FS) of 1.5 was applied to the ultimate skin friction to obtain the allowable skin friction. The allowable end bearing was obtained by estimating the percentage of the ultimate end bearing that would be mobilized by 1/2 inch of settlement at the base of the pile. 2. We recommend that the allowable uplift resistance be obtained by applying an FS of 1.5 for transient loading conditions. 3. Calculations assume liquefied soil conditions. 4. Calculations assume ground water is at about elevation 6 to 12 feet. 5 To obtain the estimated capacities above, we recommend a minimum pile spacing of 3 diameters. 6 We recommend a minimum pile embedment of 5 feet into the bearing layer. 7 We estimate that the liquefaction- induced downdrag would be -15 tons. Downdrag is not shown on the above plot, but should be anticipated in design. 120 Museum of Flight, Expansion Tukwila, Washington ESTIMATED SEISMIC CAPACITY 18- INCH - DIAMETER AUGERCAST CONCRETE PILE October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 8 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants J O Date: 10-09 -2001 File: I:\Drafting\211 \09383 -001 \21 -1 -09383 -001 Fig 9.dwg Pavement or 18" Impervious Soil Backfill Meeting Gradation Requirements for Structural Fill (See Note 2) Sloped to Drain Away from Structure Wall Drainage Sand and Gravel or Washed 3/8" to No. 8 Pea Gravel Damp Proofing Weep Holes (See Note 1) Vapor Barrier 6" Min. Excavation Slope Contractor's Responsibility 12" Min. Cover of Pea Gravel (6" Min. on Sides of Pipe) Perimeter Drain Pipe MATERIALS Drainage Sand & Gravel with the Following Specifications: Sieve Size 1 -1/2" 3/4" 1/4" No. 8 No. 30 No. 50 No. 100 (by wet sieving) % Passing by Weight 100 90 to 100 75 to 100 65 to 92 20 to 65 5 to 20 0 to 2 (non - plastic) PERIMETER DRAIN PIPE 4" Min. 4" minimum diameter perforated or slotted pipe; tight joints; sloped to drain (6 "/100' min. slope); provide clean -outs. Perforated pipe holes (3/16" to 3/8" dia.) to be in lower half of the pipe with lower quarter segment unperforated for water flow. Slotted pipe to have 1/8" maximum width slots. Not to Scale 18" Min. Capillary Break (See report text) NOTES 1. Capillary break beneath floor slab should be hydraulically connected to perimeter drain pipe. Use of 1 -inch diameter weep holes as shown is one applicable method. We estimate that the weep holes would need to be spaced approximately every 8 feet along the walls. 2. Structural fill should meet WSDOT Gravel Borrow Specification 9- 03.14(1) but should have a maximum size of 3 inches, and should not have more than 5% fines (by weight based on minus 3/4" portion) passing No. 200 sieve (by weight sieving) with no plastic fines during wet conditions or wet weather. 3. Backfill within 18" of wall should be compacted with hand - operated equipment. Heavy equipment should not be used for backfill, as such equipment operated near the wall could increase lateral earth pressures and possibly damage the wall. 4. All backfill should be placed in layers not exceeding 4" loose thickness for light equipment and 8" for heavy equipment and densely compacted. Beneath paved or sidewalk areas, compact to at least 95% Modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM: D1557, Method C or D). Otherwise compact to 90% minimum. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington TYPICAL BASEMENT WALL PERIMETER DRAIN AND BACKFILL October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 9 Geotechnlcal and Environmental Consultants APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS S HANNON f t1 VilLSON, INC. 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON NON DWI SON, NC. APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A.1 INTRODUCTION A -1 A.2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION A -1 A.3 GEOLOGIC UNITS AND DESCRIPTION A -1 A.4 BORINGS A -2 A.4.1 Drilling Procedures A -2 A.4.2 Soil Sampling A -3 A.4.3 Observation Wells A -3 A.4.4 Boring Logs A -4 A.5 CONE PENETRATION TESTS A -4 A.6 REFERENCES A -5 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. A -1 Soil Classification and Log Key (2 sheets) A -2 Log of Boring B -1 A -3 Log of Boring OW -1 A -4 Log of Boring OW -2 A -5 Log of Boring B -2 A -6 Log of Boring B -3 A -7 Log of Boring B -4 A -8 Log of Boring B -5 A -9 Log of Boring B -6 A -10 Log of Probe CPT -1 (2 sheets) A -11 Log of Probe CPT -2 (2 sheets) A -12 Log of Probe CPT -3 (2 sheets) A -13 Log of Probe CPT-4 (2 sheets) A -14 Log of Probe CPT -5 (2 sheets) A -15 Log of Probe CPT -6 (2 sheets) 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.A/wp /Ikd A -i 21 -1- 09383 -001 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATIONS A.1 INTRODUCTION SHANNON f.MiLSON. INC. The field exploration program consisted of drilling six borings and two observation wells as well as pushing six cone penetration tests (or CPTs). Borings B -1, OW -1, and OW -2 and CPT -1 and CPT -2 were completed on the east side of East Marginal Way South and borings B -2 through B -6 and CPT -3 through CPT -6 were completed on the west side of the street. The locations of the explorations are shown on Figure 2 in the main text of the report. The exploration locations and ground surface elevations of the borings and CPTs were determined from the topographic survey information provided by Bush, Roed & Hitchings (BRH). A grid of Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) tests were performed in the Commercial Gallery area; the explanation of the FWD tests and their results are provided in Appendix D. A.2 SOIL CLASSIFICATION An engineer and/or geologist from Shannon & Wilson, Inc., was present throughout the drilling and sampling operations for the borings and wells. Our representative retrieved representative soil samples and prepared a descriptive field log of the explorations. Classification of the boring and well samples was based on American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D 2487 -98, Standard Test Method for Classification of Soil for Engineering Purposes, and ASTM D 2488 -93, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual - Manual Procedure). The boring and well logs in this report represent our interpretation of the contents of the field logs. Figure A -1 of Appendix A presents a log key to the terms and symbols used in our classification of the materials encountered. A.3 GEOLOGIC UNITS AND DESCRIPTION Prior to performing the field explorations, a list of anticipated geologic units was developed for the project. In the field, geologic units were defined based on their geologic history and engineering properties. The list, which was confirmed during our field exploration program, was used to maintain consistency between the Museum of Flight Expansion location and the hangar site when defining geologic units encountered in the explorations. These geologic units are interpretive and based on our opinion of the grouping of complex sediments and soil types into 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.A/wp /Ikd A -1 21 -1- 09383 -001 �! ., 1 it SHANNON NON bW1LSON., iNC. units appropriate for the project. These geologic unit designations are shown on the Generalized Subsurface Profile (Figure 3) and in the descriptions on the boring logs in Appendix A. A.4 BORINGS The subsurface conditions at the Museum of Flight Expansion site were explored with two deep soil borings, designated B -1 and B -2, which were drilled and sampled to 121.5 and 101.5 feet, respectively. Four shallow borings, designated B -3 through B -6, were drilled to depths of approximately 5 feet. Two additional borings were drilled for observation well installation; the wells were designated OW -1 and OW -2. Observation well OW -1 was not sampled due to its proximity to boring B -1, but the well was installed to a depth of 14 feet. Observation well OW -2 was sampled and was installed to a depth of 16.5 feet. All of the soil borings and observation wells were completed by Geo -Tech Explorations, Inc., of Kent, Washington, under subcontract to Shannon & Wilson, Inc., between April 23 and 26, 2001. The locations of the six borings and two observation wells were surveyed by BRH under subcontract to The Seneca Real Estate Group, Inc., and are shown on the Site and Exploration Plan, Figure 2. BRH recorded horizontal positions as northings and eastings according to the North American Datum (NAD 83/91) and vertical positions by elevations measured according to the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD 88). The soil samples above the groundwater level were screened with a photoionization detector (PID) to determine if there were petroleum -based volatile organic compounds present; the PID did not indicate the presence of volatiles. A.4.1 Drilling Procedures A truck - mounted, B -59 drill rig was used to advance borings B -1 through B -6 and wells OW -1 and OW -2, using a combination of hollow- stem -auger (HSA) and open -hole, mud - rotary techniques. HSA drilling was performed in OW -1 and OW -2 and in the upper 15 feet of B -1 and B -2. Shallow borings B -3 through B -6 were also drilled using the HSA method. HSA drilling consists of advancing continuous - flight augers to remove soil from the borehole. Samples are obtained by removing the center bit and lowering a sampler through the hollow stem. The HSA drilling method was utilized at the project site for purposes of identifying potential soil contamination and to try and observe the groundwater level. 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.A/wp /Ikd A -2 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON v `V1L.SON, INC. In borings B -1 and B -2, below HSA drilling, an open -hole mud - rotary drilling technique was used. Open -hole mud rotary borings are advanced by circulating thick drilling mud from the rig down through standard 2 5/8 -inch outside - diameter (O.D.) NX rods to a 3 7/8- inch - diameter tri-cone bit at the bottom of the borehole. Steel casing was not used to advance any of the borings. A mixture of bentonite powder and water comprised the drilling mud. Cuttings were transported from the bottom of the borehole to the surface by drill mud flowing between the drilling rods and the sides of the open borehole. The cuttings were deposited in a settling tank at the ground surface and the mud was recirculated. A.4.2 Soil Sampling Disturbed soil samples were obtained during drilling in conjunction with the Standard Penetration Test (SPT). SPTs were performed in general accordance with ASTM Designation D 1586, Standard Method for Penetration Testing and Split - Barrel Sampling of Soils. SPTs were performed at 2.5- to 5 -foot intervals to the bottom of the borings, with the exception of B -3 through B -6, which were continuously sampled to approximately 5 feet. The sampling intervals are shown on the boring and well logs. The SPT consists of driving a 2 -inch O.D., split -spoon sampler a distance of 18 inches into the bottom of the borehole with a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required for the last 12 inches of penetration is termed the Standard Penetration Resistance (N- value). This value is an empirical parameter that provides a means for evaluating the relative density, or compactness, of granular soils and the consistency, or stiffness, of cohesive soils. Generally, whenever 50 or more blows were required to cause 6 inches or less of penetration, the test was terminated, and the number of blows and the corresponding penetration was recorded. The N- values are plotted on the boring and well logs presented in this appendix. A.4.3 Observation Wells Observation wells were installed in borings OW -1 and OW -2. Observation well OW -1 was drilled to a depth of 14.7 feet adjacent to boring B -1 and was not sampled. Observation well OW -2 was drilled and sampled to a depth of 16.5 feet. A combination of solid and slotted 2- inch - diameter PVC piping was installed. Flush- mounted monuments were installed at the ground surface. The construction details for the observation wells are shown graphically on the boring logs in this appendix. 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.A/wp /Ikd A -3 21 -1- 09383 -001 : );; -,M ;� ON .:JVI d`M1..SC'IN.1 9C. A.4.4 Boring Logs The boring and well logs for this project are presented in Appendix A. A boring log is a written record of the subsurface conditions encountered. It graphically shows the geologic units (layers) encountered in the boring and the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) symbol of each geologic layer. It also includes the natural water content (where tested), blow count, and the Atterberg limits of soil samples at various depths within the boring log where tests were performed. Other information shown on the boring logs includes the May 2001 groundwater level measurements, groundwater level observations made during drilling, approximate surface elevation, types and depths of sampling, and PID readings for measurement of potential soil contamination. A.5 CONE PENETRATION TESTS Six CPTs were completed by Northwest Cone Exploration under subcontract to Shannon & Wilson, Inc., between April 23 and 27, 2001, as part of our subsurface exploration program. These tests, designated CPT -1 through CPT -6, are located within the proposed footprint of the Museum of Flight Expansion, as shown on Figure 2 in the main text of this report. Northwest Cone Exploration provided experienced field personnel to perform and log the probes using a portable Hogentogler system. The tests were performed in general accordance with procedures outlined in ASTM Designation D -3441, Standard Method for Deep, Quasi- Static, Cone and Friction -Cone Penetration Tests of Soil. Logs of the CPT probes are presented in Figures A -10 through A -15. The purpose of the CPTs was to develop a continuous subsurface profile of the soils encountered at the proposed building site. Using this kind of testing, soil samples are not obtained. In the CPT test, steel rods with a cone tip on the end are pushed with a hydraulic ram into the soil at a relatively constant rate of approximately 2 centimeters per second (cm/sec). The hydraulic ram apparatus is mounted on steel frame, which is, in turn, mounted on a truck The cone tip is connected to a stationary friction sleeve and has a surface area of 10 square centimeters (cm2) and an angle of 30 degrees from the axis. The stationary friction sleeve has a surface area of 150 cm2 and a diameter of approximately 3.8 cm. Two load cells connected in series and a pore pressure transducer are located inside the cone tip. Prior to testing, a plastic filter element that has been saturated under vacuum in glycerin is placed between the cone tip and the stationary friction sleeve. This filter element transmits pore pressures to the pressure 21-1-09383-001 . App. A/wp /Ikd A -4 21 -1- 09383 -001 SH 'ANON ViLSON, INC. transducer located within the cone tip. The load cells measure end resistance on the cone tip and friction resistance on the stationary friction sleeve. As the cone penetrates through the soil, measurements of tip resistance, sleeve friction, and pore pressure are electrically transmitted through wires to the ground surface, and then displayed and recorded on a portable computer at 2 -inch intervals. Termination of the testing results when the penetration resistance exceeds the capacity of the hydraulic system or the target depth is reached. Seismic cone tests were performed at 1 -meter intervals in probes CPT —1, CPT -3, and CPT -5. In this test, a 10- foot -long steel H -beam is pinned between the ground and the hydraulic jacks on the rig. When the cone tip is at a stationary depth in the hole, the H -beam is hit on one side with an instrumented sledgehammer, thus creating a shear wave. A geophone located within the cone tip then measures the resulting shear wave at the cone tip. The data is displayed and recorded on a portable computer in the form of a force -time plot. Using this data, shear wave velocities can be estimated using a pseudo -time interval method. Using the estimated arrival times of the shear waves, estimates of shear wave velocity are calculated. This test provides information that is useful for the earthquake engineering studies for the project. The CPT results consist of plots of cone tip resistance, sleeve friction, friction ratio (ratio of sleeve friction to cone tip resistance), and pore pressure versus depth. This data was processed and interpreted using the computer program CPTINT (Campanella, 1992). Soil description, cone tip resistance, friction ratio, and pore pressure, as well as the estimated soil properties of friction angle, cohesion, and equivalent N -value are plotted versus depth and presented on the CPT logs. The results of the seismic cone tests are also presented on the appropriate probe logs; the logs have a plot of shear wave velocity versus depth. A.6 REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2001, Annual book of standards, Construction, v. 4.08, Soil and rock (I): D 420 - D 4914: West Conshohocken, Penn. Campanella, R.G., revised by Wong, T., 1992, CPTINT — CPT cone data interpretation program, version 4.2, Civil Engineering Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, May 31. 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.A/wp /lkd A -5 21 -1- 09383 -001 Shannon & Wilson, Inc. (S &W), uses a soil classification system modified from the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Elements of the USCS and other definitions are provided on this and the following page. Soil descriptions are based on visual - manual procedures (ASTM D 2488 -93) unless otherwise noted. S &W CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL CONSTITUENTS • MAJOR constituents compose more than 40 percent, by weight, of the soil. Major consituents are capitalized (i.e., SAND). • Minor constituents compose 12 to 50 percent of the soil and precede the major constituents (i.e., silty SAND). Minor constituents preceded by "slightly" compose 5 to 12 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND). • Trace constituents compose 0 to 5 percent of the soil (i.e., slightly silty SAND, trace of gravel). MOISTURE CONTENT DEFINITIONS Dry Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist Damp but no visible water Wet Visible free water, from below water table GRAIN SIZE DEFINITION DESCRIPTION SIEVE NUMBER AND /OR SIZE FINES < #200 (0.8 mm) SAND* - Fine - Medium - Coarse #200 to #40 (0.8 to 0.4 mm) #40 to #10 (0.4 to 2 mm) #10 to #4 (2 to 5 mm) GRAVEL* - Fine - Coarse #4 to 3/4 inch (5 to 19 mm) 3/4 to 3 inches (19 to 76 mm) COBBLES 3 to 12 inches (76 to 305 mm) BOULDERS > 12 inches (305 mm) * Unless otherwise noted, sands and gravels, when present, range from fine to coarse in grain size. RELATIVE DENSITY / CONSISTENCY COARSE- GRAINED SOILS FINE - GRAINED SOILS N, SPT, BLOWS /FT. RELATIVE DENSITY N, SPT, RELATIVE BLOWS /FT. CONSISTENCY 0 - 4 4 - 10 10 - 30 30 - 50 Over 50 'Very loose Loose Medium dense Dense Very dense Under 2 2 - 4 4 - 8 8 - 15 15 - 30 Over 30 Very soft Soft Medium stiff Stiff Very stiff Hard ABBREVIATIONS WELL AND OTHER SYMBOLS ATD At Time of Drilling Elev. Elevation ft feet FeO Iron Oxide HSA Hollow Stem Auger ID Inside Diameter in inches Ibs pounds Mon. Monument cover N Blows for last two 6 -inch increments NA Not applicable or not available NP Non plastic OD Outside diameter OVA Organic vapor analyzer PID Photo - ionization detector ppm parts per million PVC Polyvinyl Chloride SS Split spoon sampler SPT Standard penetration test USC Unified soil classification WLI Water level indicator Y✓ Y✓ fN yN Cement/Concrete Bentonite Grout Bentonite Seal Silica Sand PVC Screen Vibrating Wire Asphalt or Cap Slough Ash Bedrock Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND LOG KEY October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. A -1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Sheet 1 of 2 • UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM`(USCS) (From ASTM D 2487- 988c2488 -93) : ' • MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP /GRAPHIC SYMBOL TYPICAL DESCRIPTION COARSE- GRAINED SOILS (more than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve) Gravels (more than 50% of coarse fraction retained on No. 4 sieve) . Clean Gravels (less than 5% fines) GW ■ 5 • ■• • II Well -graded ravels, gravels, mixtures,little or no fines GP . c O o 3° o b Poorly graded gravels, gravel -sand mixtures, little or no fines Gravels with Fines (more than 12% fines) GM • Silty gravels, gravel-sand-silt mixtures y g g GC Clayey gravels, gravel- sand -clay mixtures Sands (50% or more of coarse fraction passes the No. 4 sieve) Clean Sands (less than 5% fines) SW Well- graded sands, gravelly sands, little or no fines SP Poorly graded sand, gravelly sands, little or no fines Sands with Fines (more than 12% fines) SM Silty sands, sand -silt mixtures SC Clayey sands, sand -clay mixtures FINE - GRAINED SOILS (50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve) Silts and Clays (liquid limit less than 50) Inorganic ML Inorganic silts of low to medium .plasticity, rock flour, sandy silts, gravelly silts, or clayey silts with slight plasticity CL Inorganic clays of low to medium plasficity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays Organic OL Organic pl is silts organic silty clays of Silts and Clays (liquid limit 50 or more) Inorganic MH Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sands or silty soils, elastic silt CH Inorganic clays or medium to high plasficity, sandy fat clay, or gravelly fat clay Organic OH medium Organic c clays to high 4 HIGHLY- ORGANIC SOILS Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor pT Peat, humus, swamp soils with high organic content (see ASTM D 4427) vwvr NOTES 1. Dual symbols (symbols separated by a hyphen, i.e., SP -SM, slightly silty fine SAND) are used for soils with between 5% and 12% fines or when the liquid limit and plasticity index values plot in the CL -ML area of the plasticity chart. 2. Borderline symbols (symbols separated by a slash, i.e., CL/ML, silty CLAY /clayey SILT, GW /SW, sandy GRAVEL/gravelly SAND) indicate that the soil may fall into one of two possible basic groups. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND LOG KEY October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. A -1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Sheet 2 of 2 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 21 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol cu TD_ E co cn a a ' Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30-inch drop) • Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 \TOPSOIL / 0.3 ••• 19.5 33.0 • • • .. •• - ... .. ••••••• ...... .••••• ,..... •–. .:•:•• -••• ,••• :...:••*• - • ....... "••• -••• .••••. .•••.• •–. ':•'.• ....... "•'-• ••• . - •• ..,.. '':-:•• •-t'•;-!. ..• ....... "••• .. ..., ••••• •.••.. ,....• ••••••• ':•:•' •.••,••• ...... ' ...... • • ....... •••• •••• ':•:.' •••.. ..• •. ''. • 1 • 21 3 5 I • 6T s • • ' • -is • 1 • • 2 • • 13 . ' I o o o 0 0 . 10 a c. - 0 15 ' 20 25 30 35 40 45 • . , - - Dense, dark gray to dark brown, trace to slightly silty to silty SAND, trace of --\ gravel; moist; massive; (Hf) \SP-SM/SP. r • • • Medium dense, dark gray-brown, trace to slightly silty SAND; moist; locally trace of gravel, massive to faintly bedded, scattered silty fine sand seams, scattered iron-oxide staining; (Ha) SP-SM/SP. . . • ...... A • • Loose, dark gray-brown, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND, trace of medium sand; wet; massive to faintly bedded, scattered organic fragments; (Ha) SP-SM/SM. - three 1-inch thick seams of slightly clayey silt at 30.4, 30.6, and 30.9 feet . • • - - Medium dense, dark gray-brown, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND, trace of medium sand; wet; bedded, abundant fine sandy silt seams, abundant organic fragments, scattered ash seams; (Ha) SP-SM/SM. - 1/2-inch seam of light gray clayey silt (ash) at 41.5 feet • CONTINUED NEXT PAGE 1 • • • • - - LEGEND 0 20 40 60 • % Water Content ' Sample Not Recovered Ground Water Level ATD i 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit 1—•---1 Liquid Limit IL 3-inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content 5 It 3.0' 0.D. Osterberg Sample NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. .7 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. ) 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of "Symbols' and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual-manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B-1 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A-2 Sheet 1 of 3 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 21 Ft. (NAVD 88) 1 Depth (ft) Symbol co cl) — a E cc (1) E a. a o Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30-inch drop) • Blows per foot 20 40 60 58.0 62.0 68.0 93.— 93.0 970 ..-•. ....... ....... . — .:•.■: % • •..,: . . ,.. •.1: .. " .. 15 . 161 . 17 8 19 20 1 221 23 - 55 60 65 70 75 • Interbedded, loose, dark gray-brown, fine sandy SILT, slightly silty, fine SAND, and stiff, clayey SILT; wet; abundant organic fragments; (HI) r \SM/ML. • Dense, dark gray, slightly silty, fine SAND, trace of medium sand; wet; bedded, abundant organic fragments, scattered fine sandy silt seams; (Ha) r \SP-SM. . Soft to very soft, dark gray, clayey SILT, trace of fine sand; wet; locally fine sandy at top, faintly bedded to massive, scattered organic fragments, scattered fine sand seams throughout; (HI) ML. - 3-inch thick seam of light gray, slightly fine sandy, clayey silt (ash) at 85.4 feet ' • 80 A 85 A • " . . . 90 • Medium dense, gray, silty, fine to medium SAND; wet; massive, abundant shell fragments; (He) SM. 95 Very dense, gray, slightly silty to silty SAND, trace of gravel; wet; massive, CONTINUED NEXT PAGE LEGEND 20 40 60 • % Water Content * Sample Not Recovered V, Ground Water Level AID 1 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit I-0-1 Liquid Limit a 3-inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content 11 3.0" O.D. Osterberg Sample NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of "Symbols" and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual-manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. • LOG OF BORING B-1 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A-2 Sheet 2 of 3 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 21 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol Samples E o_ o_ 0 cT_ Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard (140 lb. • 0 20 • Penetration Resistance weight, 30-inch Blows per foot 40 drop) 60 50/4' 50/6" abundant shell fragments; (He) SP-SM/SM. 107.0 121.5 .:.:... ':....': ....... :.:•'\: ....,: ...... ''-'-'? ••••••• :.::: '."' • •:.::: ....... ....... 251- 26 281 291 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 il Very dense, gray, trace to slightly silty, fine to medium SAND; wet; locally trace of fine gravel, scattered shells and organic fragments; (He) SP-SM. 50/6" /I 67 • • - BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED ON 04/24/2001 Note: Boring drilled to 17 feet with 8-inch (O.D.) hollow-stem auger, then mud rotary (3 7/8-inch tricone bit) to the bottom of the boring. : , • • ' • . . - • ' . . . . . • LEGEND 0 20 40 60 • • % Water Content • ' Sample Not Recovered SZ Ground Water Level ATD i i 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit 1—•---1 Liquid Limit , • 11 3-inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content ■ 31 3.0* O.D. Osterberg Sample NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. i 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. i 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. , 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of 'Symbols" and definitions. i 5. USCS designation is based on visual-manual classification and selected i laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B-1 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A-2 Sheet 3 of 3 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 21 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol 0 a) 75. E as (0 E c:1_ c. CD E Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30-inch drop) • Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 Notes: 1. Boring OW-1 was not sampled. See adjacent boring B-1 for soil conditions in this area. Boring drilled using an 8-inch (O.D.) hollow-stem auger. 2. On 5/4/01 well development was attempted by adding about 40 gallons of water; however, the water drained out as quickly as it was added. The well appeared to be dry. 3. The well was dry on 7/17/01. . . . No water encountered p ,• , V IN 1 . . . . . im NI . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ■ . . . . . . . . .1 . on . . . . . — 4 4 V 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 • • . . . - • - . . . . . • • . . . . . . . • , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . 16 18 • • ' . . . • . . . . . . . . . • - LEGEND 0 20 40 60 • 'Ye. Water Content • Sample Not Recovered nq Surface Seal i 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample ME Annular Sealant Plastic Limit 1-411-1 Liquid Limit IL 3-inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample NM Piezometer Screen Natural Water Content HI] Grout Ground Water Level ATD L Ground Water Level in Well NarEs Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of "Symbols" and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual-manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING OW-1 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A-3 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 17 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol 0 a) Z. E co Cr) E a a o E. Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30-inch drop) • Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 -ASPHALT CONCRETE ,— 0.3 11.0 16.5. ..•• . •.••. -.-.• ..... •••.. ..... •.•• ''• ' •.••.. ••••1: '..lx ....... ....... :•:•,: ....•-• - • ......, ......, - - -.... ...• '..'''• ..••••• ...... •••••‘: :•Ix ..•••••• ---- .1 2 3 0 0 0 • o During Drilling .1,1 'H 7/17/2001 _— r< .., 4, . . . .••••••• . . . . . . ■ . . . . . . . . . •• . . . . ■ : . . . . .1 ini . . . . 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 . . Medium dense, dark brown to dark gray, trace to slightly silty, slightly fine gravelly, SAND; moist; massive to • faintly bedded, abundant andesite grains; (Ha) SP-SM/SP. . • • • . • . . . . . . . . • . . . • • . • . . Loose, dark brown to dark gray, trace to slightly silty, fine to medium SAND, trace of fine gravel; wet; faintly bedded, abundant andesite grains; (Ha) SP-SM/SP. - fine sandy silt seam at 16.0 feet - slightly silty to silty, fine sand from 16.1 to 16.5 feet A r . . • • • • • 0 • . . . • • . . . • 16 18 20 - • . . . . .. - - BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 04/23/2001 Notes: 1. Boring drilled using an 8-inch (O.D.) hollow-stem auger. 2. On 5/4/2001, the water level in the well was approximately 9.5 feet. . . • . : . . • . . . . • • - . . . . • LEGEND 0 20 40 60 • Water Content % . * Sample Not Recovered IZIIN Surface Seal ! i 2-inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample MEM Annular Sealant Plastic Limit 1-0—I Liquid Limit IL 3-inch 0.D. Shelby Tube Sample 6:. Piezometer Screen Natural Water Content MU Grout ! Ground Water Level ATD I Ground Water Level in Well NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington ■ 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, ■ and the transition may be gradual. ■ 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of ! the nature of the subsurface materials. '• 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. l. ) 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of 'Symbols and definitions. i 5. USCS designation is based on visual-manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. : 1 LOG OF BORING OW-2 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A-4 SOIL DESCRIPTION D Depth (ft) Symbol �- G a. ( Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance - \ASPHALT CONCRETE. 0 0.5 L Ls= D 2— o I 2 D . 5 .. Medium dense to very loose, black to • • • Medium dense to dense, dark gray, F • • • • • • Interbedded, medium dense to dense, , LEGEND 0 20 40 60 • % Water Content • Sample Not Recovered Q Ground Water Level ATD • = 2 -inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit I-0-1 Liquid Limit TI 3 -inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content 5. a M Museum of Flight Expansion 7 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. u 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of L LOG OF BORING B-2 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 16 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol Samples E a. o ci Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30 -inch drop) A Blows per foot . 0 20 40 60 53.0 63.0 88.0 93.0 -r : '' ` e ':` -- • '` ' ' x --: .. • •.e : • . . 12 ,3I 14I 151 ,6I 171 9 ,I ,9I 2o1 21 I 55 60 65 �.. ': 8 A 6: 90 95 Medium dense to loose, dark gray, silty, fine SAND and fine sandy SILT; wet; faintly bedded, scattered silt seams, cohesionless; (Ha) SM /ML. • • Very soft, dark gray, clayey SILT, trace of fine sand; wet; faintly bedded, slightly fine sandy at top, scattered shell fragments at bottom; (HI) ML. - scattered light gray, clayey silt seams (ash) between 70.0 and 71.5 feet - 4- inch -thick seam of light gray, silty clay at 80.0 feet - 2- inch -thick seam of light gray, silty clay (ash) at 81.1 feet • . • • - t i • . • Very loose, gray, silty, fine SAND, trace of medium sand; wet; bedded with bioturbation, abundant shell fragments, scattered silt seams; (He) \SM. r • Dense, gray, silty SAND, trace of fine gravel; wet; massive, abundant shell fragments; (He) SM. l CONTINUED NEXT PAGE .. • E 0 20 40 60 • Sample Not Recovered • % Water Content 3Z Ground Water Level ATD = 2 -inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit 1—•-1 Liquid Limit IC 3 -inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content ' 7 NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 7 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. is 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. D 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of 'Symbols' and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual - manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B-2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -5 Sheet 2 of 3 z ca SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 16 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) Symbol m E c u E 0. a p Ground Water Depth (ft) Penetration Resistance (140 lb. weight, 30 -inch drop) A Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 grades to silty, sandy gravel at 101.2 r feet 101.5 '• 22 I 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 • 1 BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED ON 04/25/2001 NOTES: 1. No observation well was installed. Boring was backfilled with bentonite chips. 2. Boring drilled to 17 feet with 8 -inch (O.D.) hollow -stem auger, and then mud rotary (3 7/8 -inch tricone bit) to the bottom of the boring. LEGEND Ground Water Level ATD between soil types, for a proper understanding of specified and may vary. and selected 0 20 40 • % Water Content Plastic Limit 1-111-1 Liquid Limit Natural Water Content 60 * Sample Not Recovered = 2 -inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample IL 3 -inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary the nature of the subsurface materials. 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of 'Symbols' and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual - manual classification laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B-2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -5 Sheet 3 of 3 Log: WDN Rev: CLBM Typ: EET SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 17 Ft. (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) I Symbol Samples E n a a Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30 -inch drop) • Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 Concrete. 0.6 2.4 3.4 5.1 ; :. • -- — 1 2 3 ° 0 0 During Drilling +I Co 0) A N O OD O) A N •..... 64 Very dense, brown, silty, gravelly SAND; moist; massive (base course); . (Hf) SM. • Medium dense, dark brown, silty, fine to medium SAND, trace of fine gravel; moist; massive, scattered silt clasts, scattered organics; (Ha) SM. • Loose, dark brown, sandy SILT; moist to wet; massive, decreasing sand toward bottom, scattered organics; (Ha) ML. BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 04/26/2001 Note: Boring drilled using 8 -inch O.D. hollow -stem auger. LEGEND 0 20 40 60 Sample Not Recovered • % Water Content SZ Ground Water Level ATD = 2 -inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit 1-111--I Liquid Limit IL 3 -inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content NOTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of "Symbols" and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual - manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B -3 October 2001 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -6 SOIL DESCRIPTION Surface Elevation: Approx. 16 Ft. (NAVD 88) ,. aa) 0 Symbol I co fn PID (ppm) I Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance (140 Ib. weight, 30 -inch drop) • Blows per foot 0 20 40 60 - \Asphalt. • 0.2 1'9 4'7 �. • t 2 s o 0 o No water encountered W O A N O Co O) A N 63 Very dense, brown, silty, sandy GRAVEL; moist; massive; (Hf) GM. Medium dense to loose, brown, slightly silty, fine SAND; moist; massive, salt and pepper appearance; (Ha) SP -SM. • m • • BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 4/26/2001 Note: Boring drilled using 8 -inch O.D. hollow -stem auger. . • LEGEND 0 20 40 60 Sample Recovered • % Water Content • Sal Not R d Z Ground Water Level ATD = 2 -inch O.D. Split Spoon Sample Plastic Limit I-0-1 Liquid Limit IL 3 -inch O.D. Shelby Tube Sample Natural Water Content 7 NDTES Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington 7 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transition may be gradual. 2. The discussion in the text of this report is necessary for a proper understanding of the nature of the subsurface materials. 9 3. Groundwater level, if indicated above, is for the date specified and may vary. 4. Refer to KEY for explanation of 'Symbols' and definitions. 5. USCS designation is based on visual - manual classification and selected laboratory index testing. LOG OF BORING B -4 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIB (, e -7 • A SOIL DESCRIPTION D Depth (ft) 1 Symbol Samples a ( Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance —Asphalt concrete. — 0 0.3 • 1 o — o No water encountered OD 0) A N O W O) Medium dense, brown and orange mottled, slightly clayey, silty, sandy 1 Medium dense, dark gray, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND; moist; massive, abundant black and white grains; (Hf) 3 0 BOTTOM OF BORING • • LEGEND 0 20 40 • 60 CI SOIL DESCRIPTION D Depth (ft) Symbol Samples n. G Ground Water Depth (ft) Standard Penetration Resistance 60 „Asphalt concrete. .-- 0 0.3 1 0 • 0 1 No water encountered O O A N O O O A N 1. Medium dense, brown, silty, sandy 0 . :.:: 1 Medium dense, dark gray, trace to slightly silty, fine to medium SAND; • ..�. • BOTTOM OF BORING COMPLETED 4/26/2001 Note: Boring drilled using 8 -inch O.D. hollow -stem auger. LEGEND 0 Ground Water Level ATD 0 20 40 6 60 * Sample Not Recovered • Museum of Flight Expansion 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries b LOG OF BORING B -6 ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 18.0 ft (NAVD 881 I i Depth (ft) 1 CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO R, ( %) 0 3 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 Symbol ' ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Shear Strength (tsf) 0 1 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 2.5 6 8.5 10 15 20 27.5 30.5 35 40 45 50 53.5 55 60 �^ PP' �/ II I� dd ...... ' ' �� xx'° �+ * « k'• r• Medium dense to dense, silty SAND. Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT to silty CLAY with zones of sandy SILT. + 4e* t #r o-. - Q Medium dense to dense SAND. •• � (..1'. i I I'. - - - . _ _ _ ........ —_ _— - ................ - - -- ..... . _ .... - •• . • ' a , • I _......._ .... .... _ 14 <... .... — .— .... _... 1 I IS J _. . ._._ —.. ... — ..._.__. _...._.. _...._ _...__..__ ..._........_.__.._...._......_ Medium dense SAND to silty SAND. Medium dense to dense SAND. ? ' 1 s 1 * + T 1 Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT with scattered clayey zones. •-•- { X° k + I I -- �,' 1• + * , • } NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0) The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: prooerty Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington , LOG OF PROBE CPT-1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -10 I Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also - shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants; A FIG. -10 Sheet 1 of 2 ■ ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 18.0 ft (NAVD 88) c Depth (ft) S CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION R, ( 0 3 RATIO %) 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 66.0 70 75 80 85 89.7 90 92.1 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 I I —_ _ , — " + + . rr 4� Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT with sandy silt zones. • 4 - -___ L....,__...._..._ . __..— ...._._.� ._�.. — . .._........_.._._.. — .-- . - -.-- -- " —" — —_____..�— _..__..._ —. -- .._ _ Medium dense to dense SAND -, to_gravelly SAND. — "' BOTTOM OF PROBE COMPLETED 04- 23-2001 - NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundanes between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -10 I Sheet 2 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -10 Sheet 2 of 2 - ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 16.0 ft (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt (tons per square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO Rf ( %) 0 3 6 - PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 1.5 3 0 5 12.0 15 20 25 26.5 30 33.5 35 40 55 58.5 60 61.5 63.o ._ . ..............._- ._... ...... I ..._.._....._........— — ........._.. — .._.... j .._........._._._.....__....... ....._— ........` � - i x, / + +....__..__......-...... + • ` 's• .t ....._............._._._...._ , _.. .....__.. Medium dense to very dense, SAND to silty \SAND with gravelly zones. . . Loose to dense, interlayered, SAND and silty SAND. ��_... �u + ++ .. + L 5 I '::::: Medium dense to dense SAND. r.•:r ,,.'r r ; +f I ' ; ,. ��.1 I '•.. ; r { • • �i ••,.`• •• ' Loose to medium dense, silty SAND; scattered seams of soft to stiff, clayey silt. k • + + l I - 1, 1 ' �'•: � c ,• Loose to medium dense, SAND to silty SAND with scattered sandy silt layers. ' +, I ' { `.. I 1 — + •• + . x • :. t. • Loose to medium dense, sandy SILT /silty SAND to clayey SILT. — :i ''' I ti Medium dense SAND. Very loose to loose, sandy SILT to clayey SILT. NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the , properties listed above are: property M etla i Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -11 I Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe Is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest ConeNorthwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -11 Sheet 1 of 2 - ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE D Depth (ft) CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt F FRICTION RATIO P PORE PRESSURE S Symbol 1 ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle U Undrained S Shear U Uncorr. N -value Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND. 6 64.7 c c.- • Very soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT. 6 1I - -- xx . . . • • • • •• x �-- V..'. Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND. V x BOTTOM OF PROBE 9 ._ . .... ..__..__..—._._____- . .. _ _____ ..__..... _ _. -_.- __ -, .. _ _ _.. _ _._ . .. _.._ ___ NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundanes between soil types; the transition may be gradual. M Museum of Flight Expansion LOG OF PROBE CPT -2 FIG. A -11 I Sheet 2 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella L Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress O SHANNON & WILSON, INC. F FIG. A-11 V ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 18.0 ft (NAVD 881 s Depth (ft) i CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION R, ( 0 3 RATIO %) 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 5 7 0 t 0 13.0 15 20 27.0" 32.7 35 45 50 52.0 55 JI • . • • : ,•. ��9y, #' + _rn + + r, T ..r 1 J Loose to medium dense, silty SAND to sandy SILT with scattered clayey zones. 1 I — _ Medium dense to dense SAND with scattered silty sand zones. 'r I ___ + _..._. _ .. .. .; .' r•• �5� .' _ _._ ......_ __ ..... ._... _.. — — Loose to medium dense, silty SAND. Medium dense to dense SAND. rr I x a - + + + • ' • • t I — Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT with scattered zones of clayey silt. itdfli I NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: Property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -3 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -12 I Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N-Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk =12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -12 Sheet 1 of 2 V ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 18.0 ft INAVD 881 s Depth (ft) `• i CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO R, ( %) 0 3 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 1 Symbol ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Shear Strength (tsf) 0 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 66.5 70 73.0 75 76.0 80 83.0 85 90.5 90 92.2 95 98.0 100 102.0 105 108.8 110 115 120 125 :. •. • ....._.._. ff •'•: • e. Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT to sandy SILT. . +} c. I Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT to CLAY. • �I Soft, silty CLAY to CLAY. r } Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT. .._.._...._.............- . , - - - -- --._...._.._....__......._......._...........__ -- - - - - -- -- ..._......._._................_ 5J i - -- ------------- ', . 4..,_•.... ..__...._.__. , . '• Ni _ — Loose to medium dense SAND Ito silty SAND /sandy SILT. /— — Soft to medium stiff CLAY to clayey SILT. - - - --- .....—.___ ..............._.—........................__._.. i Y..._...---------......_....._._ 7 II ......._.......__.........._... — __. Medium dense SAND. -- Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND (shell fragments ?). BOTTOM OF PROBE COMPLETED 04 -23 -2001 NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: Property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -3 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -12 I Sheet 2 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N-Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -12 Sheet 2 of 2 • - • v ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 17.0 ft (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt (tons per square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO Rf ( %) 0 3 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 Symbol I EST MATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 3.0 5.0 5 10 12.0 15 20 25 30 35 40.5 40 43.0 as 60 63.0 • . ..• T _i i Dense to very dense SAND to gravelly SAND. Medium dense SAND. •.• Medium dense SAND to silty SAND with scattered sandy silt zones. I Medium dense SAND. - ( — — -- - - --- c --0y, - -r - - -- .t< +• < 'IN I •r1 ; 1 I I I 1 ( II 1 ; N ..N.__ ....._ x x IY -- -- _ -.... _.. ..... - - �" — ' ,,' • ti. , I __ __.. _... - —... __... I I I __ . — _ _ . ' ' Loose to medium dense, silty SAND to sandy R1 1 T .. ., . • -' • :. . �• •i' Medium dense SAND to silty SAND with scattered loose sandy silt/clayey silt layers. ......... _.._.....___. _ ..__.._ Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT. NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundanes between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The metho t used for estimating the properties listed above are: prooerty Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -4 October 2001 21- 1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -13 1 Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc • av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest ConeNorthwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the lip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -13 , Sheet 1 of 2 • CPT_MAIN1 21- 09383.GPJ SHAN_WIL.GDT 10/9/01 ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 17.0 ft (NAVD 88) 0 CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt (tons per square foot) 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO Rf ( %) 0 3 6 0 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 4 8 0 .0 E co ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 0 Undrained Shear Strength (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Soft CLAY to silty CLAY. Loose to medium dense, silty SAND. Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT to sandy SILT. Loose to medium dense SAND. Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND (shell fragments?). BOTTOM OF PROBE COMPLETED 04-27 -2001 72.5 70 75 80 85 90.0 90 92.0 95 97.0 99.7 100 102.1 105 110 115 120 125 NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundanes between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5 0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: Property Method Friction Angle Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Undrained Shear Strength Durgunoglu & Mitchell Robertson & Campanella gc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest ConeNorthwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -4 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechwcal and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -13 Sheet 2 of 2 • • • = i.r I _ociomw I c1 ve000.aare on _ • ,L.vv, ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 16.0 ft (NAVD RA1 IV/WV 5. CD o , CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION R, ( 0 3 RATIO %) 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 I Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 1 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 4.0 4.8 5 5.6 7.5 10 tt.0 15.5 15 19 2 20 35.5 40 41.0 43.5 45 48.5 50 55 60.0 60 i Very loose, sensitive or organic soils. �r ��� . ti. x xx w + +,+ ++ t' ' 11 Medium dense to dense, silty AND /sandy SILT. Soft to stiff, silty CLAY /clayey LT. /r • • - it ` ,i I 1 Medium dense to dense / ' + + + + * • ' ' ) I 1 Medium dense SAND to silty r Loose to medium dense, silty SAND /sandy SILT. /— tt. x — — o — — + + + .---, + { 1 f • . • -e' — _.. _ -- t ' . — — Medium dense to dense SAND. Interiayered, loose to medium dense SAND, silty SAND /sandy SILT with scattered clayey silt zones.- ■ Soft to medium stiff, clayey ILT. � Medium dense SAND to silty SAND. . • � Interlayered, loose to medium dense, silty SAND /sandy SILT and soft to stiff, clayey SILT. +. ' + • � r •• + + .• +.: dr• Very soft to stiff, clayey SILT with scattered sandy zones. NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundanes between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: Property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -5 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 Durgunoglu & Mitchell FIG. A -14 I Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength ac - ay where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -14 Sheet 1 of 2 • • • CPT_SEISMICI 21 -09383.GPJ SHAN_WIL.GDT 10/9/01 ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 16.0 h (NAVD 881 Depth (ft) I CORRECTED CONE BEARING, q, (tons/square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO R, ( %) 0 3 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 SHEAR VELOCITY V, (ft/sec) 0 600 1200 Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Strength 0 Shear (tsf) 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60, 75 80 85 87.0 90.0 90 93.7 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 -- I 1 I _ ..... __. ...._._. - - -- _. —. _ ..... .._.... _. .. • _ _.._ .. . _ .... .. .. '. �• _.._...- : — - . . I _......,_ .- t -- - - -... - ....--- ....... — — ...— - -..._ ......... .--- .......--- ----- .....- -- --._ _. ._...... _...--- ....._ —... - --- ._..__— __ .— .__ ....... ......... ..............._, _ _. .. _...._ ' T- ._......- - --._. _....._..._.. ._........_......_..........__ ._..--- -........_ _..... - .. .. ...._- -.. _ _..... ._ — .._._..__. Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND. Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND (shell fragments ?). �— ._— ..__...._........ ....._—.__._—....--- ----- --- —_.... _..._ ..__........_...._..... BOTTOM OF PROBE COMPLETED 04-24 -2001 � I 1, I NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG O F PROBE CPT -5 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -14 I Sheet 2 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson ertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength ac - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk =12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC,. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -14 , Sheet 2 of 2 • • ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 17.0 ft (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt (tons per square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION RATIO Rf ( %) 0 3 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Shear Strength (tsf) 0 1 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 Predrilled - NO DATA 1.5 13.5 16.0 20 22.0 25 29.0 30 35.5 35 46.0 49.0 50 52.0 57.6 60 62.2 I f Medium dense to dense SAND. xn i'-‘, - I Medium dense, silty SAND. '' I 0 Loose to medium dense, silty SAND. j Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY. x..___, — — a - -- :� .:: Loose to medium dense SAND. - , •• J, . , ,, f ..' •11 _ _.. 4,. ti ti — k. _. - _.... _. r - ..:, _. _ ___.. _ .. --- - .._ ..,_. _. _.. i Loose to medium dense, silty SAND /sandy SILT with scattered clayey zones. _ .. -- -. - _.. - . - -. -- _ -_ -._ - _ --- _ _ _ ..... —. _ ._. , .... _- _. -- - -- ... .. - -.. _ I I -.._ _ . _.____ ... _ - _ _ . __ ... -- -- Medium dense SAND. Very loose to medium dense, sandy SILT /silty SAND with clayey silt zones. Medium dense SAND. Very loose to medium dense, silty SAND /sandy SILT with scattered clayey zones. ... _ ..._ -- -- Soft to stiff, clayey SILT to sandy SILT. NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5.0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: property Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -6 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 FIG. A -15 I Sheet 1 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu & Mitchell Uncorrected N -Value (N60) Robertson & Campanella Undrained Shear Strength qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest ConeNorthwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). . SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. A -15 Sheet 1 of 2 • ESTIMATED SOIL PROFILE Surface Elevation: Approx. 17.0 ft (NAVD 88) Depth (ft) CORRECTED CONE BEARING, qt (tons per square foot) 0 100 200 300 400 FRICTION Rf ( 0 3 RATIO %) 6 PORE PRESSURE u (tsf) 0 4 8 I Symbol I ESTIMATED SOIL PROPERTIES Friction Angle (degrees) 0 30 60 Undrained Shear Strength (tsf) 0 2 Uncorr. N -value (blows/foot) 0 30 60 71.0 85 88.6 90 94.7 95 100 102.0 105 110.0 Ito 115.0 115 117.7 120 .--.... iii. ' + ti i• ! lei •. ' .. '' Soft CLAY to silty CLAY. L� t * 1 i —..- I`e� 1 I Soft to medium stiff, clayey SILT. f h - - -- — — • r•i -- ?: I.' f ': Medium dense SAND. jj �I I I 0'..:j'. • .6, © n•.. o. Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND (shell fragments ?). x x "� ., ...._ i 1 f • '_ , _.. —.... - - ...__._..._ .— ---- - _... I �.._ I t I ..._..__... _....... _— ...... Medium stiff to stiff, clayey SILT to sandy SILT. ��! ..... -. -_- __..--- 9• . ___ ............._,_..._._ ---- -- -.... ---- -- -_ . _.... ._...._.......... - -. Medium dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND (shell fragments?). BOTTOM OF PROBE COMPLETED 04-27-2001 NOTES: 1. The stratification lines represent the approximate boundaries between soil types; the transition may be gradual. 2. The estimated soil properties are based on analyses performed using the computer program CPTINT (Version 5 0). The method used for estimating the properties listed above are: Prooerty Method Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LOG OF PROBE CPT -6 October 2001 21- 1- 09383 -001 & Mitchell FIG. A -15 Sheet 2 of 2 Friction Angle Durgunoglu UncorrectedN- Value(N60) Robertson &Campanella Undrained Shear Strength - qc - av where: qc = Measured Cone Bearing Nk Nk = 12.5 a v = Total Overburden Stress 3. Log of probe is based on piezocone probe data provided by Northwest ConeNorthwest Cone Exploration. 4. The pore pressure was measured behind the tip of the penetrometer. Hydrostatic pore pressure based on the estimated groundwater depth is also shown above (dashed line). SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants e FIG. A A -15 Sheet 2 of 2 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHIANNO>>:i .1\11V.i _SON. INC. APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING TABLE OF CONTENTS Page B.1 INTRODUCTION B -1 B.2 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION B -1 B.3 WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION B -1 B.4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION B -1 B.5 ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION B -2 B.6 REFERENCE B -2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. B -la Grain Size Distribution, Boring B -1 B -lb Grain Size Distribution, Boring B -1 B -2 Grain Size Distribution, Boring B -2 and OW -2 B -3 Plasticity Chart 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.B /wp /lkd B -i 21 -1- 098383 -001 SHANNON u SON, iNC° APPENDIX B GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING B.1 INTRODUCTION This appendix contains descriptions of the procedures and the results of laboratory tests performed on the soil samples obtained from the field explorations for the design of the Museum of Flight Expansion in Tukwila, Washington. The samples were tested to determine the basic index properties and the engineering characteristics of the site soils. Laboratory testing was performed at the Shannon & Wilson, Inc. laboratory in Seattle, Washington, during May 2001. B.2 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION Soil samples obtained from the explorations were visually classified in the laboratory using a system based on American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: D 2487, Standard Test Method for Classification of Soil for Engineering Purposes, and ASTM. Designation: D 2488, Standard Recommended Practice for Description of Soils (Visual- Manual Procedure). This visual classification allows for convenient and consistent comparison of soils from widespread geographic areas. The sample classifications have been incorporated into the soil descriptions on the exploration logs presented in Appendix A. B.3 WATER CONTENT DETERMINATION Moisture content determinations were performed in general accordance with ASTM Designation: D 2216, Standard Method of Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil, Rock, and Soil- Aggregate Mixtures on all of the soil samples. Water contents are plotted on the boring logs presented in Appendix A. B.4 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Grain -size analyses were completed on selected samples to determine the grain -size distributions. The test were performed in general accordance with ASTM Designation: D 422, 21-1-09383-001 . App. B /wp /Ikd B -1 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON \NELSON, INC. Standard Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils. Generally, the grain -size analyses consisted of the coarse - grained fraction of the samples only, and were obtained by sieving (sieve analysis). The grain -size distributions were used to assist in classifying soils, to provide correlations with soil properties, and to assist in the liquefaction potential analyses. Results of the grain -size analyses are plotted on the grain -size distribution curves presented in Figures B -la, B -lb, and B -2. Along with the grain -size distributions is a tabulated summary containing the sample descriptions and the natural water contents. B.5 ATTERBERG LIMITS DETERMINATION The Atterberg Limits were determined on selected samples of fine - grained soil obtained in the borings in general accordance with ASTM Designation: D 4318, Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. The Atterberg Limits include Liquid Limit (LL), Plastic Limit (PL), and Plasticity Index (PI= LL -PL). They are generally used to assist in classification of soils, indicate soil consistency (when compared with natural water content), and provide correlation to soil properties including compressibility and strength. The results of the Atterberg Limits determinations are shown on the boring logs in Appendix A and shown graphically on the plasticity chart presented as Figure B -3. B.6 REFERENCE American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2001, Annual book of standards, Construction, v. 4.08, Soil and rock (I): D 420 - D 4914: West Conshohocken, Pa. 21 -1- 09383- 001.App.B /wp /Ikd B -2 21 -1- 09383 -001 p 0) 11:10142111g1Z14:i:]Wlartial SIZE OF MESH OPENING IN INCHES SIEVE ANALYSIS NO. OF MESH OPENINGS PER INCH, U.S. STANDARD HYDROMETER ANALYSIS GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS 1D _ CD O C) O N N ▪ V m O O O O O O O O • O O O O O O O O R co a 100 ____ — 0 90 10 80 —711 20 70 { 30 60 40 50 50 40 60 30 70 20 r 80 • 10 \ 90 0 co • 0 N 0CCD O t') 0 0 O CO CO O CO N '- CD tD ' C) N GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS O O O co O O O CO CO O O O O O O O 0 O COBBLES BORING AND SAMPLE NO. DEPTH (feet) • B -1, S -2 • B -1, S -5 A B -1, S -7 • B -1, S -9 O B -1, S -11 • 5.0 12.5 17.5 25.0 35.0 U.S.C.S. SYMBOL SP SP -SM SP -SM SM SP -SM COARSE FINE GRAVEL COARSE I MEDIUM SAND FINE FINES: SILT OR CLAY 100 'ER ENT COARSER BY W I SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Dark gray SAND, trace of silt and gravel Brown, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND Black, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND Black, silty, fine SAND Black, slightly silty, fine to medium SAND FINES NAT. W.C. LL PL PI 3.7 9.4 9.5 17.5 8.8 6.4 27.6 31.4 39.5 31.3 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION Boring B -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. GeotechnIcal and Environmental Consultants FIG. B-la 06/01. 10 "1IM NVH fd°J'68 •••t LNIVINV GSAMAIN1 21.09383.GPJ SHAN WIL.G DT 10/9/01 N ,N J Z W w N O. OF MESH OPENINGS PER INCH U.S. STANDAR ti M AM* '11102.1 DIE I11 O L 00' Z00' 400' 900' 800' l0' ZO' CO' 40' 90' 00Z 00 L 09 04 0Z 0l 4/l 0 0 IHOI3M ,k EI 1:1331:1V00 IN301:13c1 M 0 N t00 0 Om in 0 0 9 /£• Z/l 8/9 4/E /I. L E 9 Zl 0 COD O Co N a0 IHOI3M AS 1=13NId 1N301:13d c0) N 4 O 1.00' ZOO' £00' 400' 900' 800' LO' Z0' CO' 40' 90' 80• l' 4 9 9 0l 0Z OE 04 09 09 00 00Z 00E I 1I L'J:L�3 ti11 w z L 0 w i to cc cc 0 0 w z LL w cc 0 0 1A w —J CO 03 0 C.) 0 Z J W ¢ 0 C 0 (i) c C O 0. X C W y m LL O j Y CD 2 L : IZE DISTRIBUTI • ao Jo < C.) z3 m zo LL 01 7 cq M (07 N N • rn r` CO v 0 CO 0, QoT Iciactro J AlgaMpAed ci z; Zu 0 To J °b w z Z: a ZS Nc, z O J O.s EE CO 0) 0 (0 00 Co My a w 0 0 0 a w FE 2 J 0< 0 01 ... 2 2 0 N co co d 0_ O 0 0 0 N LL) U) U) U) (C FIG. B -1 b Z-8 'DIA ❑o•► ■• 0 07 03 07 03 93 N N ) (n (n (n fn iA (n O A fJ N N (01 n O O O O (n O O O O O (0 = Cl) Cl) ErREEVASEEEGE IT .12.1111WMILMIll 'EWE: >o 3 70 � m2 0 z> 0 m Ti ..,2 CO 00)) CO N N N in M to t0 F. CO CO CO CO G O A G (n • n-1 o r r o r p N DICY21:I11:Y0II9 -MO pue . -g • uiao : 101 I 'Will CifirV41-11NITOW m r y Z v 0 0 CO m y ualori oratimi* ,ire 0 n Cl) m z m CD m 0 c 2 m 300 ° 200 100 80 60 40 30 20 10 8 6 4 3 2 1 .8 .6 .4 .3 .2 .1 .08 .06 .04 .03 .02 .01 .008 .006 .004 .003 0 0 0 PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 4 3 2 1-1/2 3/4 5/8 /2 3/8 1/4 14 0 0 0 60 100 D 200 .06 .04 .03 .02 .01 .008 .006 .004 .003 .002 .002 .001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERCENT COARSER BY WEIGHT 0 0 O .001 ti ti��II`l�fd69�ll2N: 41:1W1Wrgli I'dMI [II I 10/6/01 10O1IM NVHS fd9E5E60 -2 INIVINVS0 PLASTICITY INDEX - PI ( %) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 -CL -M rOL rOH 0 10 . 20 30 40 50 60 LIQUID LIMIT - LL ( %) 70 80 90 100 110 LEGEND CL: Low plasticity inorganic clays; sandy and silty clays CH: High plasticity inorganic clays ML or OL: Inorganic and organic silts and clayey silts of low plasticity MH or OH: Inorganic and organic silts and clayey silts of high plasticity CL -ML: Silty clays and clayey silts BORING AND SAMPLE NO. DEPTH (feet) U.S.C.S SYMBOL SOIL CLASSIFICATION LL PL PI NAT. W.C.% PASS #200, • B -1, S -21 • B -2, S -17 80.0 75.0 ML ML Gray, clayey SILT Dark gray, clayey SILT 39 39 27 28 12 11 45.1 46.6 Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington PLASTICITY CHART October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. B -3 ATTMAIN1 21- 09383.GPJ SHAN WIL.GDT 10/9/01 APPENDIX C LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL SHANNON bWILSON. 21-1-09383-001 SHANNON +`WI `'ON,!NC. APPENDIX C LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Page C.1 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL C -1 C.2 REFERENCE C -2 Figure No. C -i C -2 C -3 C -4 C -5 C -6 C -7 C -8 C -9 C -10 C -11 C -12 C -13 C -14 C -15 C -16 LIST OF FIGURES Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, Liquefaction Analyses, 21 -1- 09383 -001.R 1 -AC.DOC/WP/LKD Design Earthquake, Boring B -1 Nisqually Earthquake, Boring B -1 Design Earthquake, Boring B -2 Nisqually Earthquake, Boring B -2 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -1 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT —1 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -2 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -2 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -3 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -3 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -4 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -4 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -5 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -5 Design Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -6 Nisqually Earthquake, CPT Probe CPT -6 C -i 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON ,F:)WJ SON, INC. APPENDIX C LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL C.1 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL Liquefaction potential from the boring data was estimated by utilizing the SPT N- values for samples obtained in the borings and their estimated fines content. Based on Seed's simplified empirical procedure and in accordance with NCEER technical report NCEER -97 -0022 (Youd and Idriss, 1997), the factor of safety against liquefaction was determined for each SPT. Liquefaction potential was also estimated from the penetration resistance data obtained in conjunction with CPTs. The liquefaction potential was also evaluated in accordance with NCEER technical report NCEER -97 -0022 (Youd and Idriss, 1997). Factors of safety were calculated for ground motions consistent with the recommended design ground motions (i.e., earthquake magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g). In addition factors of safety were calculated for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake. For this earthquake, a magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g were used. A peak ground acceleration of 0.19g was recorded at the BOE ground motion recording station located approximately 4,000 feet north- northwest of the Museum of Flight with likely similar subsurface conditions. The calculated factors of safety for each boring and CPT for both the design and Nisqually earthquakes are plotted on Figures C -1 through C -16. 21 -1- 09383 -001.R 1- AC.DOC/WP /LKD C -1 21 -1- 09383 -001 &HA O \NILSON, INC. C.2 REFERENCE Youd., T, and Idriss, I.M., 1997, Proceeding of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils, NCEER technical report NCEER -97 -0022. 21 -1- 09383- 001.R1- AC.DOC/WP /LKD C -2 21 -1- 09383 -001 10/8/01-21-1-09383 Museum of Flight B- 1.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Boring B -1) V Loose to medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND Very soft to soft, clayey SILT Medium dense to very dense SAND to silty SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 0 I I 10 20 30 40 1 • • • • • • IP • • 50 - -- 60 • • • 70 - -- 80 • • 901 -- 100 110 120 130 NOTES: • • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its density and fines content. The fines content was estimated based on selected grain -size analyses and engineering judgement. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE BORING B -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -1 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10/8/01 -21- 1.09383 MOF B -1 Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Boring B -1) 0 Loose to medium dense, slightly silty to silty, fine SAND Very soft to soft, clayey SILT Medium dense to very dense SAND to silty SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) 0 FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 10- 20---- •-------------- - -r- -- 30 40 • • • • • • • 50 - - -- 80 • • • • 70 - -- 80 • 90 — - - 100 110 120 130 NOTES: • • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its density and fines content. The fines content was estimated based on selected grain -size analyses and engineering judgement. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE BORING B -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -2 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10/8/01 -21 -1 -09383 Museum of Flight B- 2.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) (Based on Boring B -2) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0 ' I I I V Very Loose to dense, silty, fine SAND to fine to medium SAND Very soft, clayey SILT Very loose to dense, silty SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) 10 20 — 30 40 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 • • 50 -- 60 70 — 80 90 100 110 NOTES: • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its density and fines content. The fines content was estimated based on selected grain -size analyses and engineering judgement. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE BORING B -2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. C -3 10/8/01-21-1-09383 MOF B -2 Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Boring B -2) V Very Loose to dense, silty, fine SAND to fine to medium SAND Very soft, clayey SILT Very loose to dense, silty SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 I 10 • 20 - -- 30 — 40 50 — 60 • • • • • • 80 -- 90 • 100 - -- - - - 110 NOTES: • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its density and fines content. The fines content was estimated based on selected grain -size analyses and engineering judgement. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE BORING B -2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C-4 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10/9/01 -cpt 1 _Iiq_500.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -1) 0 Soft to m. stiff, clayey SILT /silty CLAY Medium dense to dense SAND to silty SAND Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND 1. FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 10 20 30 - d w w U LI- 40 p z 0 0 - 60 CO 2 II- I - w p 70 50 - 80 - 90 - 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 I. • • •• • • • • • � • ••• • • • { • •• • • • • •• • • •• • , • • •••••• • • • • ti rr ••• • • S• •' • • •t' • • • • • • • • i •• • •' • •• • ;• •$ • • �•.•. • • • •• • • • • • •{ • • S. • S • •• • • • • • • • S• •• •• • • y • • • .••- •• • • • • V • • • • NOTES: Reference: Youd, T.L. and ldriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -5 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10/9/01 -cptl _I iq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -1) V Soft to m. stiff, clayey SILT /silty CLAY Medium dense to dense SAND to silty SAND Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND 1. FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 10 20 — w 30 W V 40 cc 0 Z 50 O W 60 03 2 IH 0 o 70 80 90 100 NOTES: • • • -• • • • • • •• •• ID • • ••r • • • • •• • • •♦ •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • 1 • • • • • • • • Y • • Reference: Youd, T.L. and ldriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -1 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -6 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01 -cpt2 liq_500.xis- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -2) V Med. dense to dense SAND to silty SAND /SILT Medium dense to dense SAND Interlayered SAND, sandy SILT /silty SAND & silty CLAY Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND Very soft to medium stiff silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 • • • • •l• • •• • • • •• • • • • :{issolue •• • • j• • r • • • • • • •• •• • • III ••l' • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • S • • • W -0- •• ••• AO • • •••• • • • • sef • • • • • t • • • ,- • r •,$a.• • • • ••• •. • • • je •• • • • • •• • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -7 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01 -cpt2 liq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -2) V Med. dense to dense SAND to silty SAND /SILT Medium dense to dense SAND Interlayered SAND, sandy SILT /silty SAND & silty CLAY Loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND Very soft to medium stiff silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 • • • • • • •• • •iv • • •• •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • i• •• • • •• 41. •• • • • • S. • «••• •• • • • • 104k • • • • ! • 4- • ••� • •• • • •• •• • • • • • • • • • • i •. • • • •• • • • • • •• • • • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -2 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -8 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01 -cpt3 liq_500.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -3) V Loose to med. dense silty SAND/ sandy SILT Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) _ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 4.4 1• •- i • •� ti• • • •• • • - • 1 s•• -- • • •(s, • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • •s• •• • • M ••• •••24 •• • • • •• • f • •• • • ,• •• • • •• • • •••;_ •_ • , M_!s;• S • • }• • ••as. • ••• • • • Mi •,y • • • • • • • • •, • • • •.• a • • • • • •‘P• • • • •• • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -3 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -9 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01 -cpt3 liq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -3) 0 Loose to med. dense silty SAND/ sandy SILT Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND 1. DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 • • • OP • s'• •• •• • • I • •. • • •I • • • • •• .-- /- -• -e -• • • • • • • 40 55 • • •• •• ••• • • • • •• •• • • • t • • 1 .. • • • • • • • •• • • • •• • • • • • • • • • •• • o •• • f • •• • • • •• • • •••• • • • 'i • A •• • •• • • • • •• • t • _ •• • • • •• • • • $ ••• 55 • • • • I. • • • • • I. • • • • • • • • S_ • • • }•• :• Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The. analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -3 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. FIG. C -10 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01- cpt4_Iig500.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -4) 0 Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND/ sandy SILT Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 •10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: 1.0 1.2 . 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 • • Sj• •: •!,: • • •♦ r• • ter•• la al' • f. i • • •I AP • • •'' • • • • tow • • __t•_♦ • era • • • • • • •■vw • •• It • • • • N l• •• • • • • • i • ♦ • • • • • •• j- „•_ � - ? 10 • • •• • • • • • • • • • -• fi••- • • • • • • •• • 1. Reference: Youd,T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT-4 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON &WILSON, INC. FIG. C -11 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01- cpt4_liq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -4) V Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND/ sandy SILT Soft to medium stiff CLAY to silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0 t I I 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 NOTES: 0.8 1.0 1.2 I I I • •+ • • *S. ••• •• • t • • 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 up-es•: • •• lat• • •' ort• • • • • /O• •• •• • •• •• • • • • • • I I • 0* • • • • •• • i• • • •• •• • SA • •• • !• • • s• e • • • • 0.• '9 • • •• • '• • • • • • • �_ • • _ • ••• • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • y "• ' • "r•• •• • • • • • • •• • • r • • 1. Reference: Youd,T.L. and ldriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT-4 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. I FIG. C -12 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01- cpt5_liq_500.xIs- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -5) 0 Soft to m. stiff, clayey SILT /silty CLAY Medium dense to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Interlayered SAND, SILT, and CLAY Med. dense SAND to silty SAND Very soft to stiff, silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 10 20 30 40 — 50 — 60 — 70 — • • •1•• I • ee e •4 •w, ••-0-- -a. • • • • •• • • • • • 80 — 90 — 100 NOTES: •• • • •♦ •• • • • •_• • • • ♦• --• .• • • °O.. •• li OS • • • '• • •• • • • • 1•• •411 t•• •;• • •• 4•05 M • • • • • • ••- • • • •• • • • •• • • •• pfs • es •• • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -5 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -13 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10 /8 /01 -c pt5_liq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -5) Soft to m. stiff, clayey SILT /silty CLAY Medium dense to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Interlayered SAND, SILT, and CLAY Med. dense SAND to silty SAND Very soft to stiff, silty CLAY /clayey SILT M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND 0.0 0 10- C 20 Z 30 — d d U - LQL 40— d' N Z 50 C7 0 J w 60 — 2 a w 0 FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 R• • ♦ P ■• • • •s• ••• • •_• -- • M • • • (Po • • • -•_.• • • • 70 - 80 - •• • • • r ti • •• • • • •••• •• • • • • • •• • • • • • •• • • ••••• • • •• • • • • • • •• _s_• • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • • • • •• • •• •• • • • 90 — 100 NOTES: tt: 1 0/8/01 -cpt6_liq_500 .xls-author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -6) 0 Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Soft to med. stiff CLAY - silty CLAY Very loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Very loose to medium dense silty SAND /sandy SILT to clayey SILT Soft CLAY to silty CLAY M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND M. Stiff to stiff clayey SILT M. Dense to dense gravelly SAND 0.0 0 10 20 30 FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 I I I I i I I d 40 r- w ce 50 U) 0 Z 60 O O 70 w CO 2 I— a. 80 w 0 90 100 110 120 NOTES: -•-� • - f• . • ♦•• -• - • - • r 2.0 • • • • »• • • ••••• • S. � • •r; • ti� • • • • •• • • • ,+•l • • • IF • + • • •• S••• • • • • • • • • S • • • • •• • • S • • •.„.• • ••• • • • • '• • "S • fit •. -• ••s•• • •• • • M • • 4 • • - - - - - • • • • • • • • • • I•• • • • • • • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for an earthquake with a magnitude of 7.5 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.26g. 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES DESIGN EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -6 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. C -15 Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants 10/8/01- cpt6_liq_Nisqually.xls- author SUBSURFACE PROFILE (Based on Probe CPT -6) 0 Loose to dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Soft to med. stiff CLAY - silty CLAY Very loose to medium dense SAND to silty SAND /sandy SILT Very loose to medium dense silty SAND /sandy SILT to clayey SILT Soft CLAY to silty CLAY M. Dense to dense SAND to gravelly SAND M. Stiff to stiff clayey SILT M. Dense to dense gravelly SAND DEPTH BELOW GROUND SURFACE (feet) FACTOR -OF- SAFETY AGAINST LIQUEFACTION (FS) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 NOTES: • 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 • • • 4 • '- -•if t -r if • • ••• 16 • • •• • ••• • •• • • ••1 • • •I. • • - - -• • I • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • •••• •• • • •• • • • • • • S. • • • • • i • • •• • • •• • • •• • •• S • ab • • •• • • • • • • 4 i • •• • • • • • • 7 • • • • •• • • 1. Reference: Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., 2001, Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/ NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. 2. The analysis was performed for the February 28, 2001 Nisqually Earthquake (magnitude 6.8 and a peak ground acceleration of 0.19g). 3. The liquefaction resistance of a soil is dependent on its grain size, density, and fines content. Interpretations of soil type, density, and fines content were estimated from empirical relationships to CPT tests. Museum of Flight Expansion Tukwila, Washington LIQUEFACTION ANALYSES NISQUALLY EARTHQUAKE CPT PROBE CPT -6 October 2001 21 -1- 09383 -001 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. C -16 SHANNON 8 V BLSON, INC. APPENDIX D HEAVY FALLING WEIGHT DEFLECTOMETER (HWD) TEST RESULTS 21 -1- 09383 -001 Museum of Flight Expansion Project Non - Destructive Strength Testing Prepared by: Pavement Consultants Inc. 7530 Roosevelt Way N.E ttle, WA 98115-4221 � 'Z�L (Jerome Lyons, engineer) (Jay Sharma, P.E.) 672/2120i (Today's Date) Prepared for: Shannon & Wilson Inc. 400 North 34th Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98103 INTRODUCTION As a part of the ongoing expansion of the Museum of Flight, located at Boeing Field in Seattle, a site is under consideration for location of an additional building just across the street, on the northwest corner of South 94th Place and East Marginal Way (general location shown at right). Currently this site is occupied by Boeing Building #9 -04 and the adjoining parking lot. An early objective of the project is to evaluate the support capability of the subgrade material currently in place. Because the parking lot covers roughly three- quarters of the site, nondestructive testing can be used to aid in the determination of the strength of this subgrade material in the paved areas. WORK SCOPE Pavement Consultants Inc. has been employed by Shannon & Wilson Inc. to provide an analysis of the subgrade bearing strength of the paved area of the project site. This includes performance of the necessary non - destructive strength testing at the site and provision of a summary report complete with test results and analysis. It should be noted that the testing was limited to areas accessible to the testing equipment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS NONDESTRUCTIVE DEFLECTION TESTING A Dynatest Model 8081 Heavy Falling Weight Deflectometer (HWD, shown at right) was used to conduct the nondestructive deflection testing on the parking lot pavement. Although the HWD is used to determine strength characteristics of all pavement layers in a cross - section, the relevant results of this testing process are those concerning the subgrade. The HWD is the state -of- the -art in nondestructive deflection testing equipment. It is an impulse - loading device that was developed to apply a load to the pavement surface, and to measure pavement response to this applied load. The equipment operates by lifting a series of weights to a pre- determined height and then dropping the weights. The "falling weights" strike a Heavy Falling Weight Deflectometer. specially designed plate, imparting an impulse force to the pavement. The load magnitude and characteristics can be varied by changing the drop height, the number of weights, or the load plate size. The load plate used at the project site was 12 inches in diameter. Seven velocity transducers were used to measure pavement response to the applied load. These seven transducers are mounted on a bar and automatically lowered to the pavement surface along with the load plate. The seven measured deflections, and their distance from the applied load, define a deflection basin that is used to estimate pavement and subgrade layer material properties. A computer located in the tow vehicle controls the entire operation and records' the data measured by the load pressure cell and the velocity transducers. The nondestructive deflection testing was conducted on 18 May 2001. The pavement was tested at load levels ranging from 14,000 to 25,000 pounds force. Test points were taken across the pavement in a grid pattern of roughly 50 -foot intervals. A small portion of the parking lot was covered by automobiles and miscellaneous piles of construction materials and was not accessible for testing. Therefore, some areas have an uneven concentration of test points. An exact layout of the test points is shown in Figure 1 at the end of this report. MATERIAL PROPERTY EVALUATION The strength of each pavement layer (surface, base, and subgrade) was estimated using the deflection data collected with the HWD. The pavement layer strengths, in terms of dynamic elastic modulus, were estimated by inputting the field- measured HWD deflection basin and pavement layer thicknesses into the ELMOD computer program. This program "backcalculates ", or estimates, the elastic modulus of each pavement layer by matching the program - predicted deflection basin to the field- measured deflection basin. Subgrade California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and moduli of subgrade reaction (k- value) were estimated from the subgrade elastic moduli calculated using ELMOD, by applying standard relationships to the moduli. The relationships used were developed by the Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station in Vicksburg, Mississippi. For CBR, the standard relationship developed by the Corps was CBR = MR /X. The range of values for "X" was 750 to 3000. Based on experience with the soils common in California, the following calibrated equation was chosen for use: CBR = MR /1500 where: CBR = California Bearing Ratio ( %) MR = resilient/elastic modulus (psi). The standard relationship used to estimate k- values is: k = (MR/26)0.7788 Where: k = modulus of subgrade reaction (pci) MR = resilient/elastic modulus (psi) The material properties are summarized by test number in Table 1 on the next two pages. 2 Table 1. Material Properties from NDT. Test Numbers Station Resilient/Elastic Modulus (ksi) CBR Sub Subgrade g K -Value Subgrade g K -Value At Surface AC Surface Base Subgrade 1 - 23 1,385 36 7 4.7 78 246 2 72 2,248 56 9 6.0 95 321 3 100 603 26 10 6.7 103 232 4 124 417 39 12 8.0 119 258 5 154 620 27 11 7.3 111 246 6 178 451 38 7 4.7 78 202 7 199 268 48 6 4.0 69 181 8 225 358 34 11 7.3 111 232 9 1 470 10 10 6.7 103 191 10 24 472 38 8 5.3 87 211 11 50 786 48 9 6.0 ' 95 264 12 77 590 35 10 6.7 103 248 13 101 995 43 9 6.0 95 261 14 152 1,006 48 11 7.3 111 291 15 1 766 47 11 7.3 111 280 16 27 244 42 8 5.3 87 201 17 54 698 59 10 6.7 103 278 18 1 986 47 10 6.7 103 287 19 27 398 26 13 8.7 126 246 20 48 957 18 9 6.0 95 235 21 1 425 27 6 4.0 69 181 22 25 270 54 7 4.7 78 192 23 53 634 20 10 6.7 103 231 24 77 272 29 8 5.3 87 185 25 107 540 41 8 5.3 87 223 26 1 1,477 30 8 5.3 87 267 27 25 546 49 8 5.3 87 235 28 51 555 18 8 5.3 87 197 29 78 .699 26 9 6.0 95 231 30 99 335 16 8 5.3 87 178 31 125 281 17 7 4.7 78 166 32 146 327 27 8 5.3 87 190 33 1 393 26 7 4.7 78 192 34 24 498 23 8 5.3 87 209 35 54 485 23 9 6.0 95 211 36 78 366 27 7 4.7 78 182 37 99. 287 25 5 3.3 60 152 38 125 166 27 7 4.7 78 160 39 154 373 30 7 4.7 78 187 40 175 293 26 11 7.3 111 220 41 222 230 45 8 5.3 87 200 42 251 312 35 9 6.0 95 214 3 Table 1. Material Properties from NDT - continued. Test Numbers Station Resilient/Elastic Modulus (ksi) CBR Sub Subgrade g K -Value Subgrade g K -Value At Surface AC Surface Base Subgrade 43 276 286 32 10 6.7 103 219 44.. . 305 280 50 9 6.0 95 221 45- 322 534 58 8 5.3 87 239 46, 24 521 24 7 4.7 78 199 47 78 269 17 5 3.3 60 146 48 127 574 37 9 6.0 95 239 49 174 232 48 9 6.0 95 213 50 225 324 52 8 5.3 87 215 51 277 380 37 10 6.7 103 225 52 1 281 26 8 5.3 87 153 53 51 250 50 12 8.0 119 163 54 102 152 36 2 1.3 29 227 55 148 163 20 6 4.0 69 241 56 202 516 39 11 7.3 111 199 57 253 286 29 11 7.3 111 207 58 25 446 36 10 6.7 103 209 59 76 427 24 9 6.0 95 224 60 124 388 19 8 5.3 87 223 61 176 320 18 12 8.0 119 199 62 225 606 29 10 6.7 103 207 63 298 2,386 26 7 4.7 78 213 64 1 161 20 7 4.7 78 212 65 62 558 22 7 4.7 78 225 66 113 257 11 9 6.0 95 ' 164 67 154 420 19 9 6.0 95 246 68 250 396 8 7 4.7 78 187 69 306 431 20 9 6.0 95 206 70 25 446 30 7 4.7 78 186 71 85 377 24 10 6.7 103 210 72 117 504 31 11 7.3 111 231 73 173 356 25 7 4.7 78 245 74 226 234 18 8 5.3 87 170 75 27 482 .24 8 5.3 87 159 76 48 262 32 11 7.3 111 261 77 99 493 19. 9 6.0 95 205 78 1 221 16 8 5.3 87 189 79 25 473 27 8 5.3 87 243 80 1 295 28 12 8.0 119 97 81 56 267 22 14 9.3 134 139 82 103 351 24 11 7.3 111 255 83 217 516 46 8 5.3 87 221 4 Figure 1. Non — Destructive Pavement Test Point Layout. Museum of Flight Expansion Project. Drawing Date: 21 May 2001 Building 9 -04 9 010 011 012 013 026 033 1 027 034 046 28 035 02 029 036 047 03 021030 037 04 022031 038 048 05 023032 039 6 024 040 049 07 025 08 041 050 14 018 019 020 015 016 017 042 043 051 0 44 0 45 052 064 058 070 0 53 055 056 057 065 0S9 071 075 060 061 062 063 066 067 068 069 East Marginal Way 072 073 074 076 077 e78 079 Random points taken in fenced —off area. (approximate location) 0 50 100 200 PAVEMENT CONSULTANTS INC. KI NON 6WILSON. INC. APPENDIX E IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL REPORT 21 -1- 09383 -001 1 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants Attachment to and part of Report 21 -1- 09383 -001 Date: November 6, 2001 To: Bart Heath The Seneca Real Estate Group, Inc. Important Information About Your Geotechnical/Environmental Report CONSULTING SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES AND FOR SPECIFIC CLIENTS. Consultants prepare reports to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate for a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Unless indicated otherwise, your consultant prepared your report expressly for you and expressly for the purposes you indicated. No one other than you should apply this report for its intended purpose without first conferring with the consultant. No party should apply this report for any purpose other than that originally contemplated without first conferring with the consultant. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS BASED ON PROJECT-SPECIFIC FACTORS. A geotechnical/environmental report is based on a subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a unique set of project - specific factors. Depending on the project, these may include: the general nature of the structure and property involved; its size and configuration; its historical use and practice; the location of the structure on the site and its orientation; other improvements such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities; and the additional risk created by scope -of- service limitations imposed by the client. To help avoid costly problems, ask the consultant to evaluate how any factors that change subsequent to the date of the report may affect the recommendations. Unless your consultant indicates otherwise, your report should not be used: (1) when the nature of the proposed project is changed (for example, if an office building will be erected instead of a parking garage, or if a refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated one, or chemicals are discovered on or near the site); (2) when the size, elevation, or configuration of the proposed project is altered; (3) when the location or orientation of the proposed project is modified; (4) when there is a change of ownership; or (5) for application to an adjacent site. Consultants cannot accept responsibility for problems that may occur if they are not consulted after factors which were considered in the development of the report have changed. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE. Subsurface conditions may be affected as a result of natural processes or human activity. Because a geotechnical/environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration, construction decisions should not be based on a report whose adequacy may have been affected by time. Ask the consultant to advise if additional tests are desirable before construction starts; for example, groundwater conditions commonly vary seasonally. Construction operations at or adjacent to the site and natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations may also affect subsurface conditions and, thus, the continuing adequacy of a geotechnical/environmental report. The consultant should be kept apprised of any such events, and should be consulted to determine if additional tests are necessary. MOST RECOMMENDATIONS ARE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENTS. Site exploration and testing identifies actual surface and subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken. The data were extrapolated by your consultant, who then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall subsurface conditions. The actual interface between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than your report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from those predicted in your report. While nothing can be done to prevent such situations, you and your consultant can work together to help reduce their impacts. Retaining your consultant to observe subsurface construction operations can be particularly beneficial in this respect. A REPORT'S CONCLUSIONS ARE PRELIMINARY. The conclusions contained in your consultant's report are preliminary because they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only during earthwork; therefore, you should retain your consultant to observe actual conditions and to provide conclusions. Only the consultant who prepared the report is fully familiar with the background information needed to determine whether or not the report's Page 1 of 2 1/2001 recommendations based on those conclusions are valid and whether or not the contractor is abiding by applicable recommendations. The consultant who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the adequacy of the report's recommendations if another party is retained to observe construction. THE CONSULTANT'S REPORT IS SUBJECT TO MISINTERPRETATION. Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretation of a geotechnical/environmental report. To help avoid these problems, the consultant should be retained to work with other project design professionals to explain relevant geotechnical, geological, hydrogeological, and environmental findings, and to review the adequacy of their plans and specifications relative to these issues. BORING LOGS AND /OR MONITORING WELL DATA SHOULD NOT BE SEPARATED FROM THE REPORT. Final boring logs developed by the consultant are based upon interpretation of field logs (assembled by site personnel), field test results, and laboratory and/or office evaluation of field samples and data. Only final boring logs and data are customarily included in geotechnical/environmental reports. These final logs should not, under any circumstances, be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errors or omissions in the transfer process. To reduce the likelihood of boring log or monitoring well misinterpretation, contractors should be given ready access to the complete geotechnical engineering/environmental report prepared or authorized for their use. If access is provided only to the report prepared for you, you should advise contractors of the report's limitations, assuming that a contractor was not one of the specific persons for whom the report was prepared, and that developing construction cost estimates was not one of the specific purposes for which it was prepared. While a contractor may gain important knowledge from a report prepared for another party, the contractor should discuss the report with your consultant and perform the additional or alternative work believed necessary to obtain the data specifically appropriate for construction cost estimating purposes. Some clients hold the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to contractors helps prevent costly construction problems and the adversarial attitudes that aggravate them to a disproportionate scale. READ RESPONSIBILITY CLAUSES CLOSELY. Because geotechnical /environmental engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other design disciplines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against consultants. To help prevent this problem, consultants have developed a number of clauses for use in their contracts, reports and other documents. These responsibility clauses are not exculpatory clauses designed to transfer the consultant's liabilities to other parties; rather, they are definitive clauses that identify where the consultant's responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in your report, and you are encouraged to read them closely. Your consultant will be pleased to give full and frank answers to your questions. The preceding paragraphs are based on information provided by the ASFE /Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the Geosciences, Silver Spring, Maryland Page 2 of 2 1/2001 EXHIBIT 7. T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST. MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 921.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 482.91 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 519.05 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 516.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 244,544 SQUARE FEET (5.61 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh..7 -1 oane/oi T— HANGAR C —D —E PARCEL DESCRIPTION TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 33 ati� =USH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 3 .34 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1's 200' DRAWN ' PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL DESCRIPTION TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 8 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., N KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, :'HENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 8 -1 08/28 /01 MARGINAL WAY S. L 522433'49 "E 132.01' / EXCHANGE .4, (`✓/ 7 _I / PROPERTY ...4 ti4 »/ / go Ay/ / N2213'49'W .. / / 129.79' // // TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING 31. / / / L_-/ / 1 N2843'34'W 658.60' BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFOaGRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1 200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/23/01 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 9 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DEED (BOEING TO KCMOFA) After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner. BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (14 -06 Property) GRANTOR: THE BOEING COMPANY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 000160- 0019 -05 THE GRANTOR, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Dated , 2001. THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation By Its Exh. 9 -1 oarzaro1 Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Exh. 9 -2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that . he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 9 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO: 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66 °18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN'OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 9 -A -1 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS [to be completed before recording] Exh. 9 -B -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of • Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the alternative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance No. 7444; or, in the alternative as aeronautical property as that term is defined by the Federal Aviation Administration in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ( "Boeing "), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity, of the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404 - 9002 -08 092304- 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420- 1032 -01 000740 - 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 9 -C -1 EXHIBIT 10 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DEED (KCMOFA TO COUNTY) After Recording Return To: King County Prosecutor's Office Civil Division, #E550 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -3212 Attn: Sally G. Tenney BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (14 -06 Property) GRANTOR: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 000160- 0019 -05 THE GRANTOR, KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Exh. 10 -1 Dated 2001. KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON a Washington municipal corporation By Its Exh. 10 -2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument: Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 10 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE G7 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOU1 rI LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF,202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66°18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 10 -A -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS Terms and Conditions of Use Restriction Covenant contained in deed recorded under Recording No. [to be completed before recording] Exh. 10 -B -1 EXHIBIT 11 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Exchange Property) GRANTOR: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 542260- 0124 -07 THE GRANTOR, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. And reserving therefrom an aviation easement if required by the Federal Aviation Administration. Exh. 11 -1 Dated , 2001. Approved as to form: Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation By Its Its Exh. 11-2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 1 1 -3 08 /28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ,NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 11-A-1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS [to be completed before recording] Exh. 11 -B -1 08128101 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall . at all times be used only in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of King County, Washington ( "King County "), as the grantor of the Property and its successors and assigns. King County owns substantial property in the vicinity of the Property that it operates as the King County International Airport (as identified below, the "Airport Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. King County wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Airport Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Airport Property so long as some or all of the Airport Property is operated as an airport. The Airport Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: [To be completed] 3. Enforcement. The owner of the Airport Property may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or termination by mutual written agreement of the owners of the Property and the Airport Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as none of the Airport Property is no longer operated as an airport. To provide record notice of such termination, the owner of the Airport Property will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 1 1 -C -1 EXHIBIT 12 SHARED PARKING AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor: King County, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33,.Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit D Tax Parcel Number: Exh. 12 -1 08/28/01 This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. Grantor owns those certain parcel of land legally described on the attached Exhibit A ( "the T -Hangar A & B Parcel ") and Exhibit B (the "T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel ") (collectively, the "T -Hangar Parcels "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to (i) that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel "); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit D ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a ,part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, 'Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved parking area located under, on and over that portion of the T -Hangar Parcels legally described on the attached Exhibit E, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree: 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, (i) a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area for museum parking and access; and (ii) a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area for purposes of the installation, operation, monitoring, maintenance, reconfiguration, restoration and replacement of stormwater drainage facilities. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T- Hangar Parcels, is legally described on the attached Exhibit E and approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F. 3. Purpose of Grant. This purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) museum parking (including bus parking); (ii) the occasional use of a portion of the Easement Area for the movement of large aircraft between Exh. 12 -2 08 /28/01 the airport taxiway located east of the Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South; (iii) the right to install, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate stormwater detention facilities under, on and over the Easement Area; and (iv) the right to install, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate electrical utility facilities under, on and over the Easement Area. 4. Restriction. Grantee shall develop procedures with KCIA approval to ensure that Grantee's use of the Easement Area does not prevent the tenants of the T- Hangars Parcels from having continued access to parking on the Easement Area. 5. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. 6. Construction License. Grantor hereby grants Grantee a perpetual, non - exclusive license under, over and across the Easement Area, as reasonably deemed necessary by Grantee for the purposes'set forth in Section 3, to (i) restripe and reconfigure th'_ Easement Area to be suitable for museum parking needs; (ii) construct, maintain, repair, replace, improve and operate the stormwater detention facilities; and (iii) restore the Lasement Area as set forth below. 7. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during the construction, maintenance or operation of the stormwater detention facilities to at least substantially the quality existing immediately prior to such disturbance. 8. Ownership of Stormwater Detention Facilities. The stormwater detention facilities shall be the sole property of Grantee. 9. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee's actions. 10. Indemnity. 10.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The Exh. 12 -3 08/28/01 • obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantees or its agents or employees. 10.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. 11. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 Exh. 12 -4 KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 12. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). 13. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Facility and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 14. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 15. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. 16. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the extent- necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. Exh. 12 -5 08/28/01 DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 12 -6 08/28 /01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for' the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 12 -7 08/28/01 J EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" :WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR C -D -E PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 921.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 482.91 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 519.05 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 516.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 244,544 SQUARE FEET (5.61 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -B -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE,SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SF TD SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -C -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET A' ONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE P'' INT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -D -1. 08128101 EXHIBIT E LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET I '.ONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST. MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67°28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 59.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °31'55" WEST 731.61 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE SOUTH 88 °52'39" EAST 75.59 FEET; SOUTH 22 °43'59" EAST 601.53 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 18.93 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 49,327 SQUARE FEET (1.13 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 12 -E -1 08/28/O1 EXHIBIT F GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA Exh. 12 -F -1 08/28/01 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N87 5722'W 18.93' SHARED PARKING EASEMENT 4 33 334 USH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 . E -MAIL: INFOCORHINC.COM • ' J09 NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1' -200' ORAW11 PJl CHECKED DCN DATE 6/10/01 SHARED PARKING EASEMENT TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 13 SITE 3 PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Site 3 Property) GRANTOR: THE BOEING COMPANY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 562420 - 1034 -09 THE GRANTOR, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. Exh. 13 -1 Dated , 2001. Accepted in accordance with the terms hereof: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation By Its Its Exh. 13 -2 08/28/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged th4: he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of The Boeing Company, a Delaware corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence . that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he /she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he /she was authorized to execute the instrument and . acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 13 -3 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Exh. 13 -A -1 Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27°23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment being the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exh. 13 -A -2 EXHIBIT B EXCEPTIONS [to be completed before recording] Exh. 13 -B -1 08/28101 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the alternative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ( "Boeing "), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity of the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404- 9002 -08 092304 - 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420- 1032 -01 000740 - 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 13 -C -1 EXHIBIT 14 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE This Second Amendment to Lease is entered into this day of 2000 between the KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority ( "KCMOFA ") and the MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "MOFF ") with reference to the following: A. KCMOFA and MOFF previously entered into that certain Lease Agreement (the "Lease ") dated April 30, 1986 and that certain Memorandum of Lease Agreement (the "Memorandum of Lease ") dated April 30, 1986, recorded in King County under Auditor's Number 8605270681, and a First Amendment to Lease dated February 23, 1988, recorded in King County under Auditor's Number 8808150442. B. The Lessor and the Lessee and the County have agreed that at such time as KCMOFA obtains title to the premises known as the Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property, both of which are legally described in Exhibit A hereto, that these parcels shall be included in the Leased Premises (defined in the Lease) and become subject to the te..ns.of the Lease. C. KCMOFA has, as of , 2001 and , 2002, obtained title to the Exchange Property and the Site 3 Parcel, respectively. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property shall be included in the Leased Premises and shall be subject to the terms of the Lease. 2. The Lease and the Memorandum of Lease are hereby amended to include the legal descriptions of the Site 3 Property and the Exchange Property, which are as stated in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference. 3. Except as specifically amended hereby, all terms of the Lease and Memorandum of Lease remain in full force and effect. LESSOR: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its Secretary Exh. 14 -1 08/28/01 LESSEE: MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation By Its Chairman of the Board By Its Secretary Exh. 14 -2 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE 3 PROPERTY AND EXCHANGE PROPERTY Site 3 Property: REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East; Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way Exh. 14 -A -1 South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of said Lot C of Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment; being the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exchange Property: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, . TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 14 -A -2 EXHIBIT 15 TIE -DOWN AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor: King County,. Washington, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: Exh. 15 -1 08128/01 RECITALS A. Grantor owns that certain parcel of land legally described on the attached Exhibit A ( "the T -Hangar A & B Parcel "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit B ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel "); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved airplane tie -down area located on and over that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel legally described on the attached Exhibit D, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, non - exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree: 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement on and over the Easement Area for aircraft movement and access. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T -Hangar Parcels, is legally described on the attached Exhibit D and approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E. 3. Purpose of Grant. This purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) the movement of large aircraft between the airport taxiway located east of the Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South; and (ii) the right to temporarily move and relocate the airplanes located at the airplane tie -downs on the Easement Area to facilitate movement of larger airplanes in connection with the operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel. 4. Restriction. Grantee shall develop procedures with KCIA approval to ensure that Grantee's use of the Easement Area does not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the tenants of the airplane tie -downs located on the Easement Area. At . a minimum, Grantee must provide KCIA with a minimum of fourteen (14) days notice of any temporary movement of the airplanes located at the airplane tie -downs and secure alternative tie -down or parking space as needed for such displaced airplanes. 5. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. 6. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during Grantee's use of the Easement Area to at least substantially the quality existing immediately prior to such disturbance. 7. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee's actions. 8. Indemnity. 8.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Giantees or its agents or employees. 8.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising -out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or Exh. 15 -3 08128/01 employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. 9. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 10. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). Exh. 15 -4 11. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of G rantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar Parcels, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 13. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. . 14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of, any such •provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, 'such provision shall be modified to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 15 -5 08/28101 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires ) ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the • of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 15 -6 08/28/01 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34 WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -A -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENC•SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15-B-1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE,NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THI' POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22 ". EAST 96.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 87.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °56'41" WEST 392.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °43'59" EAST 82.54 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 305.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 29,742 SQUARE FEET (0.68 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -D -1 EXHIBIT E GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA Ove.5. • htj- G)•; . z o) MARGINAL WAY S. TIE DOWN AREA EASEMENT N 22'33'49' W 129.79' S87'57'22'E 96.74' /.tom A/ / TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N28'43'34'W 87.13' N87'56'41'W 118.69' / 7-- --- S22'43'59'E 82.54' N28'43'34'W N28'431341'W 658.80' 222.77' BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144. FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E —MAIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM r JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE DRAWN CHECKED DATE 1' 200' PJL DCN 8/10/01 11E DOWN AREA EASEMENT TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 16 TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING AREA EASEMENT AGREEMENT WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner GRANT OF EASEMENT Grantor: King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation Grantee: King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority Legal Description of T -Hangar A & B Parcel: Abbreviated: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit A Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of MOF Core Facility Parcel: Abbreviated: Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit B Tax Parcel Number: Legal Description of Exchange Property: Abbreviated: Sec. 33, Twnshp 24N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal at Exhibit C Tax Parcel Number: This GRANT OF EASEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2001 by and between King County, Washington, a Washington municipal corporation ( "Grantor "), and King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority ( "Grantee "), with reference to the following facts: Exh. 16 -1 08/28/01 RECITALS A. Grantor owns that certain parcel of land legally described on the attached Exhibit A ( "the T- Hangar A & B Parcel "). The Easement granted herein is appurtenant to (i) that certain parcel of land owned by Grantee that is legally described on the attached Exhibit B ( "MOF Core Facility Parcel "); and (ii) that certain parcel of land that Grantee intends to acquire, as legally described on the attached Exhibit C ( "Exchange Property "). B. Grantee is planning an expansion of the MOF Facility. ( "MOF Expansion Project "). As a part of the MOF Expansion Project and the future operation of the MOF Core Facility Parcel, Grantee desires to have access to a portion of the paved parking area located on and over that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel legally described on the attached Exhibit D, approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit E and further described below ( "Easement Area "). C. Grantor desires to grant to Grantees a perpetual, exclusive easement under, on and over the Easement Area on the terms and conditions of this Agri: ement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals (which are incorporated herein by reference) and the mutual covenants herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor and Grantee agree: 1. Grant to Grantee. Grantor hereby grants, conveys and warrants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, exclusive easement on and over the Easement Area for museum parking, aircraft movement and access. 2. Easement Area. The Easement Area, which is located on the T -Hangar Parcels, is legally described on the attached Exhibit E and approximately illustrated on the attached Exhibit F. 3. Purpose of Grant. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide Grantee with the right to use the Easement Area for (i) parking and movement of aircraft, buses, cars, and other vehicles in connection with the MOF Facility; and (ii) the occasional use of a portion of the Easement Area for the movement of aircraft between the airport taxiway located east of the Easement Area to the property located west of the taxiway and across East Marginal Way South. 4. Management. Grantee may contract with a third party to manage its operations and activities on the Easement Area; provided that, Grantee shall be solely responsible for all actions of such manager. Exh. 16 -2 08126/01 5. Construction License. Grantor hereby grants Grantee a perpetual, non - exclusive license under, over and across the Easement Area, as reasonably deemed necessary by Grantee for the purposes set forth in Section 3, to (i) restripe and reconfigure the Easement Area to be suitable for museum parking needs; and (ii) restore the Easement Area as set forth below. 6. Restoration. Grantees agrees to restore any part of the Easement Area that is materially disturbed during Grantee's use of the Easement Area to at least substantially the quality existing immediately prior to such disturbance. 7. Liens. Grantees shall promptly pay or otherwise satisfy and discharge any mechanic's or material supplier's lien imposed on the Easement Area as the result of Grantee' -s actions. Indemnity. 8.1 Grantee Indemnity. Grantee, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantor, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. Grantee further agrees to defend Grantor, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantee, its agents or employees arising from Grantee's use of the Easement Area or activities in connection with such use. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not include claims, costs, damages, or expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of. (a) Grantor, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantee, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantees or its agents or employees. 8.2 Grantor Indemnity. Grantor, its successors or assigns, will protect, save and hold harmless Grantee, its authorized agents and employees, from all claims, actions, costs, damages or expenses of any nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. Grantor further agrees to defend Grantee, its agents or employees, in any litigation, including the payment of any costs or attorneys' fees, for any claims or action commenced thereon arising out of or in connection with any negligent or wrongful acts or activities of Grantor, its agents or employees. The obligations of the preceding two sentences shall not - include claims, costs, .damages, or . expenses to the extent caused by the negligence or misconduct of Grantor, its agents or employees. If such claims, costs, damages or expenses are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of (a) Grantee, its agents or employees, and (b) Grantor, its agents or employees, this indemnity provision shall be valid and enforceable only to the extent of the negligence or misconduct of Grantor or its agents or employees. Exh. 16 -3 08/28/01 9. Notice. Any notice permitted or required to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and may be effected by certified United States mail, with return receipt requested, properly addressed, postage prepaid, by reputable overnight delivery service, or by personal delivery, as follows: County: with a copy to: KCMOFA: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 or to such other address or to such other person's attention of which notice was given in accordance with this paragraph. Notice shall be deemed effective upon receipt. 10. Legal Action. In the event of any litigation or other proceedings to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, expenses and attorneys' fees incurred in such litigation or other proceeding (and any appeal - therefrom and collection of any judgment or award rendered therein). 11. Binding on Successors. All terms, conditions, agreements, restrictions, and covenants herein contained shall be appurtenant, shall touch and concern the T -Hangar A & B Exh. 16 -4 Parcel, the MOF Facility and the Exchange Property, shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their respective heirs, successors and transferees, including without limitation all subsequent owners of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel, the MOF Core Facility Parcel and the Exchange Property. 12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 13. Entire Agreement. This is the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior or . contemporaneous agreements with respect thereto. 14. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected thereby. ' DATED as of the day and year written above. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By By Its Executive Its Approved as to Form: By Exh. 16 -5 08128/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF KING I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of King County, Washington, a Washington municipal . corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF KING Notary Public Print Name My commission expires -. ) ss. I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the King County Museum of Flight Authority, a Washington public development authority to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: (Use this space for notarial stamp /seal) Notary Public Print Name My commission expires Exh. 16 -6 08/28101 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -A -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT B LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MOF CORE FACILITY PARCEL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -B -1 EXHIBIT C LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EXCHANGE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE'NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88°18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -C -1 08/28/01 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET; THENCE'NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 96.74 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 87.13 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87 °56'41" EAST 118.69 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 28 °43'34" EAST 222.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 35,102 SQUARE FEET (0.81 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 16 -D- I 08/28/01 EXHIBIT E GENERAL DEPICTION OF THE EASEMENT AREA Exh. 16 -E -1 08128/01 • ., E..XP1r. 'i5 "171 I L • 7.., 8 -z. 3 -0 MA - RGINAL WAY S. M N 2213'49" W TRANSIENT 129.79 AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING EASEMENT r3 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N2843'341'W 858.80' / / / / / / / / S8757122'E 98.74' LN28'43'34'W 87.13' 222.77• ��� S28`43'34"E n�• BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS Sc LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1' 200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 TRANSIENT AIRCRAFT AND VEHICLE PARKING EASEMENT TUKWILA WASHINGTON EXHIBIT 17 BOEING ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REGARDING BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY Document List: • Vista Information Solutions. Site Assessment Plus Report for South Park (Reports ID 723101901). August 5, 1999. The report identifies properties listed in federal and state hazardous materials databases. • Memo from R. Beckerman to Landau Associates dated December 23, 1999. Request for Proposal — To provide a "Phase 1" Study for a Transfer of Real Estate. • Memo and Environmental Assessment Summary Report from S. Tochko to C. Brandt dated January 20, 2000. Terminal 128 property and Building 14 -06: 9725 and 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, WA 98108. The assessment summarizes all past environmental investigations for the subject properties. • Landau Associates. 2000. Work Plan — Soil and Groundwater Investigation, 14 -06 Building, Tukwila, Washington. August 10, 2000. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated August 29, 2000 transmitting analysis for four (4) water samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated August 30, 2000 transmitting analysis for nineteen (19) soil samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. • Memo from S. Tochko to T. Walther dated September 29, 2000. Terminal 128 property and Building 14 -06; 9725 and 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, Washington 98109. This memo summarizes environmental results of the environmental Phase I assessment conducted by the Museum of Flight and the Phase II subsurface investigation conducted by Boeing at Building 14 -06. Included in this assessment: (1) GeoEngineers. 2000. Reports — Phase 1 Environmental Assessment 8620 East Marginal Way S., Seattle, WA 98109. May 25. This document reports the Phase I activities for Building 14 -06. (2) Landau Associates. 2000. Report — Soil and Groundwater Investigation, 14 -06 Building, Tukwila, WA. September 25. • Analytical Resources Incorporated to Joan McGilton dated September 26, 2000 transmitting analysis for three (3) soil samples collected Building 14 -06 property, Phase II subsurface investigation. Exh. 17 -1 o8f28IO EXHIBIT 18 DEPICTION OF AIRCRAFT TRANSIT CORRIDOR Exh. 18 -1 08/28/01 ,1/ / , / / , , / / 011011111111111111{111111{11{11111C`driV 61111:11111'11:11H1111111' 0 0 'AIRCRAFT TRANSIT CORRIDOR( APPENDIX A MOF EXPANSION PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DEPICTIONS J Appendix A -1 08/28/01 APPENDIX A Museum of Flight Expansion Description The Museum of Flight Expansion is a large scale increase to the existing facility as well as a large scale growth on the west side of East Marginal Way South. The two major building elements will be connected by a pedestrian skybridge and sweeping roof over the street to form an integrated campus. The campus will become an icon facility easily recognizable from Interstate 5 as well as from the air. The structures on each side of the street will have three levels. EAST SIDE: Plaza Level: The Plaza Level will be slightly lower than the existing street grade. It will feature a new entrance dedicated to the participants in the vast array of educational programs offered by the Museum. This level will include a new, exciting Educational Gallery dedicated to those programs. The Catering Kitchen will be expanded to accommodate a significant growth in the number of visitors. A large area dedicated to the preservation of the archives, library materials, and collections will also be on this level. Some areas of this space will be temperature and humidity controlled to insure preservation. This space will be accessible to researchers and scholars. First Floor: The first floor will feature a new sweeping lobby, increased retail space for the gift shop, enlarged food service cafe, and the World War II collection and exhibits displayed in the new Military Gallery. Additionally, the Red Barn will be enclosed in a new Pavilion Structure, thus preserving this very important artifact. A B -17 and other exhibits will tell the "Boeing Story". Second Floor: The second floor will house the World War I collection in a highly interactive /interpretive series of exhibits. WEST SIDE First Floor: First floor of this major new gallery will be nearly equivalent to two football fields and will house the foremost collection of significant commercial aircraft in the world. Featured here will be the very first Boeing 727,737, and 747s ever produced. Several other significant commercial aircraft will also be displayed. Appendix A -2 08/28/01 Second Floor: This level will serve as the skybridge entrance to the Commercial Gallery with a prominent mezzanine providing an overlook to the large commercial aircraft. This space will be suitable for hosting large special events as well. Third Floor: This level will house the new Space Gallery with such exciting exhibits as Lab/Hab mock -up of the International Space Station, Lunar Excursion Module and an example of the first Sputnik space craft. Appendix A -3 08/28/01 ,• awillsi■IN■••=1r /Nag; 4? A 440 A:=1 -IC OM &It A 01 tg mg. 41- ;1-1 r If 71 7-7 41" CILJ :7'4\ MMus .177 1111111111 OM - db. 171 _ ■ 1 • 1. ,1 IWI 1 r LO 1-f- 1-;11-1 471 NV■811■1■1112K11 r _A! Lati&walm: • - [1 I ).22.W • ..■•• / ral'",1 ••■•••=1111•1 •■■••••••■ 1•11111• ,. - , • '---,- 1 ! 1.... - I I ,opis t•1111illel'1111111t110,11N1111111111111111111 IT M1 Ti In APPENDIX B PUBLIC BENEFIT COMMITMENTS The Property Transfer Agreement (the "Agreement ") entered into by and between King County (the "County "); King County Museum of Flight Authority ( "KCMOFA "); Museum of Flight Foundation ( "MOFF "); and The Boeing Company ( "Boeing ") provides, in relevant part, for certain Public Benefit Commitments to be delivered by KCMOFA and MOFF. The Parties to the Agreement acknowledge that KCMOFA and MOFF currently provide significant public benefits through the Museum of Flight ( "MOF ") resources and educational programs. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, KCMOFA and MOFF agree to work with the King County Executive's office to provide the following additional public benefits: A. Education will continue to be one of the MOF's primary public purposes and will be accomplished through exhibitions and programs that focus on the MOF's substantial aviation and space collection and other exhibits to which it has access. B. The MOF will closely cooperate with the public and private schools in King County to provide student workshops and special tours. The MOF will encourage extensive visitor participation in interpretive and educational programs through lectures, films, tours and similar activities. C. The MOF will annually allocate 300 free passes to be used by disadvantaged youth and other low- income individuals in King County. The passes will be distributed through King County based nonprofit organizations. D. The MOF will collaborate with educational institutions such as local community colleges to coordinate vocational education programs related to the aviation industry. E. The MOF will work to develop hands -on educational opportunities for school -age children and disadvantaged youth and seek additional cross - programming opportunities with other County programs. such as the literacy program. Appendix B -1 PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, AND THE BOEING COMPANY Dated: October 31, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1. Definitions 3 Section 2. Intent and Relations 8 Section 3. Conveyance and Improvement of the Building 14 -06 Property and the Lot 14 Property 10 Section 4. Boundary Line Adjustment and Conveyance of Exchange Property Fee and Other Related Easements 14 Section 5. Shared Use Parking and Common Areas 17 Section 6. Conveyance of Site 3 Property 18 Section 7. Costs and Expenses 21 Section 8. Environmental Matters 22 Section 9. Title insurance 25 Section 10. County Approvals 26 Section 11. Development and Public Benefit Commitments 26 Section 12. Permitting 27 Section 13. Representations and Warranties 27 Section 14. Dispute Resolution • 31 Section 15. Miscellaneous Provisions 31 EXHIBIT 1 EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 4 EXHIBIT 5 EXHIBIT 6 EXHIBIT 7 EXHIBIT 8 EXHIBIT 9 EXHIBIT 10 EXHIBIT 11 EXHIBIT 12 EXHIBIT 13 EXHIBIT 14 EXHIBIT 15 EXHIBIT 16 EXHIBIT 17 EXHIBIT 18 Appendix A - Appendix B - Building 14 -06 Property Description Lot 13 and 14 Property Description MOF Core Facility Property Description T -Hangar Scope of Work Statement Site 3 Property Description T- Hangar A & B Parcel Description T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel Description Exchange Property Parcel Description Building 14 -06 Property Deed (Boeing to KCMOFA) Building 14 -06 Property Deed (KCMOFA to County) Exchange Property Deed Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement Site 3 Property Deed Second Amendment to Lease (KCMOFA and MOFF) Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area Easement Agreement Boeing Environmental Data Regarding Building 14 -06 Property Depiction of Aircraft Transit Corridor MOF Expansion Project Description and Depictions Public Benefit Commitments PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT THIS PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is dated as of` • October 31, 2001 and is by and between KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation. (the "County "); KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority ( "KCMOFA "); MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "MOFF "); and THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ( "Boeing "). This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals A. The County created KCMOFA through Ordinance 7444 (December, 1985) as a public development authority under state law to assist with the development of a world class aviation museum called the Museum of Flight (the "MOF "). MOF is a unique and valuable aviation resource for the County and the greater Puget Sound area. MOF is one of the premier aviation museums in the United States, with a superior collection of planes, space artifacts, and archival documents. MOF was ranked as the region's number four tourist attraction in 1999 with 325,000 visitors. The MOF Core Facility (as defined below) is used as a first -class aviation museum and provides important public benefits, including education programs for over 100,000 participants, to County residents. B. MOFF operates the MOF. MOFF has identified a need to significantly expand MOF display and storage facilities to house some of the more important planes in the MOF collection, including the first Boeing 747 and an early Air Force One, as well as to expand MOF 'archives and educational facilities. MOFF enjoys substantial support in the community at large and has raised significant funds for the MOF Expansion Project (as defined below). C. The County, through its department of the King County International Airport ( "KCIA "), currently owns the T- Hangar A & B Parcel, which land is located immediately north and adjacent to the MOF Core Facility, and on which is currently located T- Hangars A & B t!nd 18 airplane tie-downs. The County leases space in T- Hangars A & B and leases the airplane tie - downs located on the T- Hangar A & B Parcel to private parties, which generates revenue for the County. The T- Hangar A & B Parcel was acquired using some FAA funds. D. The' County owns the Lot 14 Property, which is located north of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel. Boeing owns the Building 14 -06 Property, which comprises land and a building on a parcel surrounded on three sides by the Lot 14 Property. Boeing has expressed a willingness to donate the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA in connection with the MOF Expansion Project. Neither the Lot 14 Property nor the Building 14 -06 Property were acquired using FAA funds. E. Boeing owns the Site 3 Property, which comprises land located across East Marginal Way from the MOF Core Facility. Boeing has expressed a willingness to donate the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA for the MOF Expansion Project. F. The Metropolitan King County Council has expressed support for working with the Parties to facilitate the MOF Expansion Project. G. The Parties desire to document the teens and conditions on which they have agreed with respect to the foregoing recitals as more particularly set forth in this Agreement. H. Appropriate approvals from the FAA are essential to implement the terms of this Agreement. T. This Agreement is not intended to serve as a "development agreement" within the meaning of RCW Chapter 36.70B. No development permits are approved by this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and promises contained herein, and the benefits to be realized by each party, the Parties agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. All words in this Agreement bearing initial capitals, .other than proper nouns, section headings or words required to be capitalized for proper usage, are defined terms and have the meanings specifically assigned to them as stated below. "120 Day Contingency Period" means the period expiring 120 days from the date of this Agreement. "14 -06 Contingency Period" means the period expiring 30 days from the date of this Agreement. "1988 Loan" means the $2 million loan from King County to KCMOFA for the construction of the restaurant that is part of the MOF Core Facility, the balance of which is being repaid in installments by KCMOFA using restaurant revenues. "Agreement" means this Property Transfer Agreement and all exhibits and attachments hereto, as from time to time amended in accordance with the terms hereof. "Aircraft Transit Corridor" means the approximately 200 foot wide strip comprised of the Tie -Down Area, the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area, the Exchange Property, and a portion of the Shared Parking Area, all as depicted on Exhibit 18. "Boeing Temporary License" means the temporary license on the Building 14 -06 Property granted by Boeing to MOFF for purposes, related to engineering efforts to support future demolition of Building 14 -06, of access, building inspection, site surveys, geotechi►ical 'surveys (exclusive of soil extraction), design engineering, and site preparation and permitting activities related to future demolition of the existing building on the Building 14 -06 Property and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel to the Building 14- 06 Property. "Building 14 -06 Property"_ means the property currently owned by Boeing and described in Exhibit 1. "Council" means the Metropolitan King County Council. "County Construction License" means the temporary construction license provided by the County to MOtF for purposes of access, building inspection, asbestos /lead remediation, site surveys, geotechnical surveys, design engineering, site preparation and permitting activities, relocation of T- Hangars A & B and the airplane tie -downs from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs to the Lot 14 Property. "DOE" means the Washington Department of Ecology. "Environmental Expenses" means all liability, claims, damages, costs and expenses incurred because of the Release of any Hazardous Materials into the environment, including, without limitation, costs of Remediation, penalties and fines, legal fees and expenses, consultant and expert witness fees and expenses, court costs, costs of environmental investigations, studies, testing and related analyses, natural resource damages, liabilities to third parties, and expenses associated with any dispute, including enforcement of rights of contribution or indemnification; provided however that such costs and expenses shall not be Environmental Expenses unless they are required by, or necessary to comply with, an Environmental Law. "Environmental Laws" means any applicable federal, state and local laws (whether under common law, statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, code or otherwise), permits, orders, decrees, and other requirements of governmental authorities relating to the protection of human health or the environment, whether existing as of the date hereof, previously enforced, or subsequently enacted. "Exchange Property" means that portion of the T -Hangar A & B Parcel described and depicted in Exhibit 8 to be conveyed in fee from the County to KCMOFA. "FAA" means the Federal Aviation Administration. "FAA Approval" means necessary final approvals from the Federal Aviation Administration for the transactions described in this Agreement to the extent required to convey the real property, including easement interests, provided for herein. "FIRPTA Certificate" means a Transferor's Certification of Non - Foreign Status duly executed by the conveyor of title to property hereunder. "Force Majeure Event" means a delay that is the result of any fire or other casualty, act of God, earthquake, flood, epidemic, landslide, war, riot, civil commotion, general unavailability of certain materials, strike, lockout labor dispute or other occurrence beyond the control of any party. "Hazardous Materials" means any element, compound, chemical, chemical mixture, or other substance that is identified as, or determined to be, a hazardous, toxic or dangerous substance, pollutant, contaminant, waste or material under, or is otherwise regulated under, any Environmental Law or other law relating to chemical management, environmental contamination, environmental cleanup or nuisances, including, without limitation, petroleum and petroleum products, asbestos, radon and other radioactive materials, and lead -based paint. "Lot 13 Property" means the land owned by the County and described and depicted as Lot 13 in Exhibit 2. 'Lot 14 Property" means the land owned by the County and described and depicted as Lot 14 in Exhibit 2. "MOF Core Facility" means the existing KCMOFA land and MOF structures located at 9409 East Marginal Way South in Seattle and described and depicted in Exhibit 3. "MOF Expansion Project" means the proposed addition to the existing MOF Core Facility, as described and depicted in Appendix A. "MOF Lease" means the lease dated April 30, 1986, a memorandum of which was recorded in King County under AFN 8605270681, and a First Amendment to Lease, dated February 23, 198g, recorded under AFN 8808150442, all between KCMOFA as landlord and MOFF as tenant. "Museum Purposes" means any use consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444 (the charter ordinance for KCMOFA). "Parties" means collectively (i) the County; (ii) KCMOFA; (iii) MOFF and (iv) Boeing. "Public Benefit Commitments" means the commitments of KCMOFA and MOFF as set forth in Appendix B to this Agreement. "Release" means releasing, spilling, leaking, pumping, pouring, emitting, emptying, discharging, injecting, escaping, leaching, disposing, or dumping of a Hazardous Material or solid waste, as that term is defined in the Solid Waste Disposal Act. "Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs" means the demolition of T- Hangar A, the relocation of T- Hangar B from the T- Hangar A & B Parcel to the Lot 14 Property and/or the Building 14 -06 Property and the construction of a new T- Hangar A at the Lot 14 Property and/or the Building 14 -06 Property, as described in the scope of work listed in Exhibit 4. "Remedy" or "Remediation" means any action to identify. eliminate or minimize any threat or potential threat to human health or the environment posed by Hazardous Materials, including any investigation, removal, or clean-up or monitoring activities. "Shared Parking Area" means the parking area located on the west side of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel and the T- Hangar C -D -E Parcel. "Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement" means the easement provided by the County to MOFF and KCMOFA for purposes of using the Shared Parking Area for airplane and motor vehicle movement across the south 200 feet of the Shared Parking Area, parking (including bus parking) and below ground stormwater detention purposes, as further described in Exhibit 12. "Site 3 Property" means the property currently owned by Boeing and located across East Marginal Way from the MOF Core Facility and described and depicted in Exhibit 5. "T-Hangars A & B" means the existing two rows of hangars located on the T -Hangar A & B Parcel. "T- Hangars C -D -E" means the existing three rows of hangars located immediately north of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel. "T- Hangar A & B Parcel" means the property currently owned by the County described and depicted in Exhibit 6, which is located adjacent to the MOF Core Facility and upon which are currently located hangars A & B. "T- Hangar C -D -E Parcel" means the property currently owned by the County described and depicted in Exhibit 7, which is located adjacent to the T- Hangar A & B Parcel and upon which sit hangars C -D -E. "Tie -Down Area" means that portion of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel owned by the County and located immediately north of the Exchange Property. "Tie -Down Area Easement" means the easement provided by the County to KCMOFA for purposes of using the Tie -Down Area for moving aircraft between the west taxi -way located to the east of the MOF Core Facility and the Site 3 Property, as further described in Exhibit 15. "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area" means that portion of the T- Hangar A & B Parcel owned by the County and located immediately east of the Exchange Property and Tie -Down Area. "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Easement" means the easement provided by the County to MOFF and KCMOFA for purposes of using the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area for airplane, school bus and other vehicle parking, as further described in Exhibit 16. Section 2. Intent and Relations. A. Intent. Subject to certain feasibility contingencies provided herein, this Agreement reflects the agreement of the Parties to proceed with activities related and integral to the MOF Expansion Project. 1. Creation of Rights and Obligations. This Agreement gives rise to rights of, assigns responsibilities among, and creates obligations on the Parties as described herein. Each of the Parties will use good faith efforts to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, including the expenditure of resources in reliance upon the mutual undertakings it describes. 2. Assurance and Covenants. This Agreement is entered into by the Parties with the specific understanding and relying on the assurance and covenants of MOFF and KCMOFA to timely carry out the activities related and integral to the MOF Expansion Project. The Parties further agree that MOFF will operate the MOF consistent with the Public Benefit Commitments set forth in Appendix B to this Agreement. B. Overriding Legal Requirements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, nothing shall be deemed to preclude or excuse the Parties from complying with mandated requirements of federal, state or local law in MOF Expansion Project implementation. Mandated requirements shall include measures uniformly applicable to all similar projects or properties that, if not observed, would subject the Parties to penalties, sanctions, loss of funds or other restrictions, or findings of noncompliance. C. FAA Approvals. The Parties' obligations under this Agreement are conditioned on receipt of FAA Approval by December 31, 2003 except as follows: 1. Obligations with respect to due diligence materials as set forth in Sections 3.D and 6.E; 2. Obligations with respect to contingency period inspections as set forth in Sections 3.A, 4.0 and 6.A, including the indemnity obligations set forth therein; and 3. Boeing's obligations to convey the Site 3 Property. If KCMOFA accepts conveyance of the Site 3 Property from Boeing, then all of KCMOFA's and MOFF's obligations to Boeing with respect to such property as set forth in this Agreement shall thereafter not be subject to this condition. Nothing herein shall require KCMOFA or MOFF to conduct any demolition or construction activity or require such entities, the County or Boeing to make any conveyances described herein until FAA Approval is received. D. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the ' State of Washington. Any suit filed between Parties concerning this Agreement shall be commenced in the Superior Court for the State of Washington in King County. Section 3. Conveyance and Improvement of the Building 14 -06 Property and the Lot 14 Property. A. 14 -06 Contingency Period. Prior to the execution and delivery of this Agreement, Boeing has delivered or made available to KCMOFA and the. County copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the Building 14 -06 Property, and, to the extent material to the prospective conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property and not privileged or confidential, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies; environmental reports and permits for the Building 14 -06 Property and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and the County and in Boeing's possession or under Boeing's control. Prior to execution of this Agreement, KCMOFA has had, and during the 14 -06 Contingency Period, KCMOFA and the County shall have access to the Building 14 -06 Property and entitlement to enter upon such property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan development tasks; provided, however, that KCMOFA shall give Boeing reasonable notice prior to any soils extraction tests being performed by or for KCMOFA or the County. KCMOFA will carry liability insurance naming Boeing as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA and the County will each indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of each entity's own activities on the Building 14 -06 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 3.A. KCMOFA and the County shall not be required to indemnify Boeing for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Boeing during KCMOFA and County activities on the 'Building 14 -06 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 3.A. KCMOFA and the County agree to keep the Building 14 -06 Property free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's and the County's own inspection activities, and to repair any damage to such property caused as a result of KCMOFA's or the County's own inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. Before the end of the 14 -06 Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to Boeing and to the other Parties of whether or not KCMOFA elects to accept conveyance by Boeing of title to the Building 14 -06 Property based upon KCMOFA's and the County's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical environmental conditions, legal title, and zoning matters). B. Conveyance of Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 3.A above, that KCMOFA will accept conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property, Boeing agrees to convey, and KCMOFA agrees to accept, fee title to the Building 14 -06 Property, subject to Sections 7 and 8 hereof and to the following: 1. All representations and warranties of KCMOFA contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date made and as of the time of such conveyance with the same effect as if those representations and warranties were made at and as of the time of the conveyance. 2. KCMOFA shall not then be in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement to be performed by KCMOFA under this Agreement. The conveyance of title to the Building 14 -06 Property shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 9 hereto, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. The conveyance shall occur on a date mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA but not later than ninety (90) days after execution of this Agreement or thirty (30) days following receipt of FAA Approval, whichever is later. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's gift of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. C. Conveyance of Building 14 -06 Property to County. If Boeing conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA pursuant to Section 3.B above, KCMOFA agrees to convey, and the County agrees to accept, fee title to the Building 14 -06 Property. The conveyance of title to the Building 14 -06 Property to the County shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 10 hereto, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. This conveyance shall be completed on a date mutually agreed by KCMOFA and the County, but not later than sixty (60) days following receipt of final certificate of occupancy of the new T -Hangar A and the relocated T -Hangar B; or thirty (30) days following KCMOFA's acquisition of the Building 14 -06 Property if such acquisition has not occurred when such certificate of occupancy is received. D. Delivery of Reports. If notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 3.A above, is to the effect that KCMOFA will not accept conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property, then KCMOFA shall deliver to Boeing a copy of each inspection, study, investigation, analysis, test, report, and the like, excluding financial analyses, obtained by or prepared for KCMOFA pursuant to this Section 3. In addition, in such event, KCMOFA shall return to Boeing all materials (including- all copies thereof) provided- or generated by Boeing with regard to the Building 14 -06 Property and delivered to KCMOFA or MOFF. E. Demolition and Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs. If Boeing conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA, then after such conveyance but before KCMOFA conveys the Building 14 -06 Property to the County pursuant to Section 3.0 hereof, MOFF will cause the building located on the Building 14 -06 Property to be demolished and removed from such property. In addition, MOFF shall complete the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -Downs no later than nine months following issuance of the final building permit for the scope of work described in Exhibit 4. MOFF shall be responsible for securing the required permits and approvals for all work related to such demolition and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs. The County will cooperate to the extent the land owner's consent is required in obtaining such permits and approvals. MOFF will perform the work in a lien free manner. MOFF will carry liability insurance naming the County as an additional insured for such work. MOFF will indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of MOFF activities on the Building 14- 06 Property and the Lot 14 Property pursuant to this Section 3.E. MOFF shall not be required to indemnify the County for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the County. F. Boeing Construction License. Boeing hereby grants the Boeing Temporary License to MOFF for the purpose of preparing to do the work described in Section 3.E. The Boeing Temporary License shall expire on conveyance of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA. G. County Construction License. The County hereby grants the County Construction License to MOFF for the purpose of doing the work described in Section 3.E. H. Charitable Purposes. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's gift of the Building 14 -06 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. Boeing and KCMOFA intend, and KCMOFA represents and warrants, that KCMOFA's use of the Building 14 -06 Property shall be only as planned in connection with the MOF Expansion Project (as described on Appendix A); in the alternative, for Museum Purposes; or, in the alternative, as "aeronautical property" as that term is defined by the FAA in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook. Section 4. Boundary Line Adjustment and Conveyance of Exchange Property Fee and Other Related Easements. A. Boundary Line Adjustment. After the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs, the County agrees to obtain a boundary line adjustment to legally segregate the Exchange Property from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and, to the extent that the T -Hangar A & B Parcel is a part of the T- Hangar C -D -E Parcel, from the T -Hangar C -D -E Parcel. The County agrees to initiate the boundary line adjustment and KCMOFA will cooperate in this process and be responsible for any related third party costs. B. Conveyance of Exchange Property. Following the boundary line adjustment and the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - Downs, and subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in Sections 4.C. and D. below, the County agrees to convey, and KCMOFA agrees to accept, fee title to the Exchange Property. The conveyance of title to the Exchange Property shall be accomplished by a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 11 and shall occur no later than sixty (60) days following receipt of final certificate of occupancy of relocated T- Hangars A & B; or thirty (30) days following KCMOFA's acquisition of the Building 14 -06 Property if -such acquisition has not occurred when such certificate of occupancy is received. The deed conveying the Exchange Property to KCMOFA shall restrict the use of the Exchange Property to Museum Purposes only. Upon this conveyance (and the conveyance of the Site 3 Property described in Section 6 below), the MOFA Lease shall be amended to include the Exchange Property within the leased premises pursuant to an amendment in the form attached as Exhibit 14. C. Acceptance of Exchange Property. KCMOFA's obligation to accept conveyance of the Exchange Property shall be conditioned upon KCMOFA's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical and environmental conditions, legal, title, and zoning matters) before expiration of the 120 Day Contingency Period. Within twenty (20) days after the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the County shall deliver or make available to KCMOFA copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the T -Hangar A & B Parcel, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies, environmental reports and permits for the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and in the County's possession or under the County's control. During the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall have access to the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and shall be entitled to enter upon the property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan development tasks. KCMOFA will purchase liability insurance naming the County as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA will indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys fees) arising out of KCMOFA activities on the T- Hangar A & B Parcel pursuant to this Section 4.D. KCMOFA shall not be required to indemnify the County for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of the County. KCMOFA agrees to keep the T= Hangar A & B Parcel free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's inspection activities and to repair any damage to such property caused by KCMOFA's inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. At the end or before the end of the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to the County of whether or not KCMOFA elects to proceed with the conveyance of the Exchange Property. D. Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA that KCMOFA has agreed to accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property in accordance with Section 6.B below, the County agrees to provide an easement agreement in.the form attached .as... Exhibit 15 (the "Tie -Down Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for use of the Tie -Down Area, including for vehicle access and aircraft movement. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Tie -Down Area. 2. Right to Temporarily Move and Relocate Airplanes. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to temporarily move and relocate the airplanes located at the tie -downs on the Tie -Down Area to facilitate movement of larger aircraft in connection with operation of the MOF; provided that, MOFF shall provide at least fourteen (14) days notice to the County of such activity, and MOFF will secure alternative tie -down or parking space as needed for such displaced aircraft. 3. Hangar Tenant Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall develop procedures, to be approved by KCIA, to ensure that their use of the Tie -Down Area does not unreasonably interfere with the rights of the tenants of the tie -downs located on the Tie -Down Area. 4. Aircraft Transit Corridor. KCMOFA and MOFF. shall have the right. to ... use the Tie -Down Area as a part of the Aircraft Transit Corridor. E. Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area Easement. The County agrees to provide an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit 16 (the "Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for airplane and vehicle parking in the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area. 2. Right to Reconfgure. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to restripe and reconfigure the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area to be suitable for MOF parking needs. 3. Right to Control. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to control the parking at the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area, which shall include parking for airplanes, buses, cars, and other vehicles in connection with the operation of the MOF. 4. Aircraft Transit Corridor. KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the right to use the Transient Aircraft and Vehicle Parking Area as a part of the Aircraft Transit Corridor. Section 5. Shared Use Parking and Common Areas. A. Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement. The County agrees to provide an easement agreement in the form attached as Exhibit 12 (the "Shared Parking Area Easement Agreement ") to KCMOFA for MOF parking rights (including bus parking) to the Shared Parking Area. 1. Management Agreement. KCMOFA shall contract with MOFF for management of the easement activities on the Shared Use Parking Area. 2. Right to Reconfigure. KCMOFA and MOFF- shall have the right to restripe and reconfigure the Shared Parking Area to be suitable for MOF parking needs.- 3. Hangar Tenant Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall develop procedures to ensure that their use of the Shared Parking Area does not prevent the tenants of T- Hangars C -D -E from having continued access to parking on the Shared Parking Area. 4. Stormwater Detention. The County and KCMOFA agree that KCMOFA's and MOFF's use of the Shared Parking Area shall. include, ;f necessary, a stormwater detention system so long as the same does not materially interfere with or impede the availability of parking or the Shared Use Area for County and MOF activities. B. 747 Parking. KCMOFA and MOFF shall . have the right to park the MOF 747 airplane on the Loft 13 Property and Lot 14 Property, until such time as it can be moved to the. Site 3 Property. Such • parking shall not interfere with the Relocation of T -Hangars & Tie - Downs. Section 6. Conveyance of Site 3 Property. A. Acceptance of Site 3 Property. Boeing has made or will make available to KCMOFA copies of all available plans and specifications relating to the Site 3 Property, and, to the extent material to the prospective conveyance of the Site 3 Property in light of the MOF Expansion Project and not privileged or confidential, all surveys, topographical and plat maps, results of soil tests, engineering studies, environmental reports and permits for the Site 3 Property and any other test results or reports, and other information or reports reasonably requested by the KCMOFA and in Boeing's possession or under Boeing's control. Prior to the execution of this Agreement, KCMOFA has had, and during the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall have access to the Site 3 Property and entitlement to enter upon such property for the limited purposes of performing feasibility investigations, tests, and studies, and site plan . development tasks, provided, however, that KCMOFA shall give Boeing reasonable notice prior to any soils extraction tests being performed by or for KCMOFA. KCMOFA will purchase liability insurance naming Boeing as an additional insured for such inspection work. KCMOFA will indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against all liability, damages, costs and expenses (including attorneys' fees) arising out of KCMOFA activities on the Site 3. Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 6.A. KCMOFA shall not be required to indemnify Boeing for amounts arising out of the negligent acts or omissions of Boeing during the KCMOFA activities on the Site 3 Property as described in or pursuant to this Section 6.A. KCMOFA agrees to keep the Site 3 Property free and clear of any liens arising from KCMOFA's inspection activities, and to repair any damage to such property caused as a result of KCMOFA's inspection activities if KCMOFA does not acquire such property. Before the end of the 120 Day Contingency Period, KCMOFA shall give notice in writing to Boeing of whether or not KCMOFA elects to accept the conveyance by Boeing of title to the Site 3 Property, based upon KCMOFA's approval of the condition of such property (including matters relating to the physical and environmental conditions, legal title, and zoning matters). B. No Further Action Determination. Upon receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 6.A above, that KCMOFA shall accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property, Boeing agrees to use its best reasonable efforts to (i) take actions required of it to obtain and (ii) obtain, or, assist KCMOFA or MOFF to obtain a no further action determination from DOE with respect to the Site 3 Property. C. Conveyance of Site .3 Property. Boeing agrees to convey, and KCMOFA. agrees to accept, fee title to the Site 3 Property, subject to Sections 7 and 8 hereof and to the following: 1. All representations and warranties of KCMOF k contained in this Agreement shall be true and correct as of the date made and as of the time of the conveyance with the same effect as if those representations and warranties were made at and as of the time of . such conveyance. 2. KCMOFA shall not be in default in the performance of any covenant or agreement to be performed by KCMOFA under this Agreement. 3. The conveyance of title to the Site 3 Property shall be accomplished by the execution of a deed in the form attached as Exhibit 13, accompanied by a FIRPTA Certificate, appropriately executed, and a duly executed and completed real estate excise tax affidavit. The transfer and conveyance shall be completed on a date mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA, but no later than April 30, 2002. If conveyance of the Site 3 Property occurs before issuance of the no further action determination described in Section 6.B above, KCMOFA shall provide Boeing with access to the Site 3 Property for Boeing to conduct activities appropriate to its assistance in KCMOFA's or MOFF's securing the no further action determination. Such access will be pursuant to a plan mutually agreed by Boeing and KCMOFA and amended as appropriate from time to time designed to minimize interference with KCMOFA's development activities for the Site 3 Property. Upon this conveyance (and the conveyance of the Exchange Property described in Section 4 above), KCMOFA or MOFF or both shall cause the MOF Lease to be amended to include the Site 3 Property within the leased premises pursuant to the amendment in the form attached as Exhibit 14. D. Charitable Purposes. The Parties acknowledge that Boeing's gift of the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA is in furtherance of charitable purposes to lessen the burdens of government. Boeing and KCMOFA intend, and KCMOFA warrants, that KCMOFA's use of the Site 3 Property shall be only for the MOF Expansion Project; or, in the alternative, for Museum Purposes. E. Delivery of Reports. If notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section.6.A above, is to the effect that KCMOFA will not accept conveyance of the Site 3 Property, then KCMOFA shall deliver to Boeing a copy of each inspection, study, investigation, analysis, test, report, and the like, excluding financial analyses, obtained or prepared for KCMOFA pursuant to this Section 6. In such event, KCMOFA shall return to Boeing all , materials provided and self - generated with regard to the Site 3 Property. Section 7. Costs and Expenses. A. Boeing Costs Related to Conveyance. If the conveyance contemplated in Section 3.B or in Section '6 is consummated, then Boeing shall bear the following costs and expenses with respect to any such conveyance: 1. excise taxes and fees payable on the transfer of title to real property, 2. the cost of recording the relevant deed; and 3. Boeing's share of prorations, as described in Section 7.D below. B. KCMOFA Costs Related to Conveyance. If the conveyance contemplated in Section 3.B or in Section 6 is consummated, then KCMOFA shall bear the following costs and expenses with respect to any such conveyance: 1. all premiums for the KCMOFA's title policy, if any, and 2. KCMOFA's share of prorations, as described in Section 7.D below. C. Prorated Costs. If conveyances in Sections 3.0 or 4.B are consummated, KCMOFA and the County will each pay their respective share .of..prorations as provided in Section 7.D below and the premium for any title policy obtained by such party. There should be no excise tax on such transfers and KCMOFA and the County will share the recording fees. D. Tax and Utility Expenses. All taxes and utility expenses relating to the property being conveyed pursuant to Section 3 or Section 6, including without limitation, real property taxes and assessments, shall be prorated on an accrual basis as of the date of the pertinent conveyance. If the grantor and grantee of each, such conveyances are unable to obtain final meter readings from all applicable meters as of the time of conveyance, such expenses shall be reasonably estimated as of such time on the basis of the prior operating history of the respective property. Section 8. Environmental Matters. A. KCMOFA Acknowledgement. KCMOFA hereby acknowledges that Boeing has disclosed the existence of asbestos at the Building 14 -06 Property, at locations including, but not limited to, the roofing material, soffits, joint materials and ventilation system. B. Site 3 Property Remediation. The Site 3 Property is part of a larger site -wide voluntary remediation agreement between Boeing and DOE. The Site 3 Property is currently subject to an ongoing environmental action plan intended to result in a no further action determination by DOE. 1. Completion of Remediation Activities. Conditioned on receipt of notice from KCMOFA, pursuant to Section 6.A above, that KCMOFA shall accept conveyance of title to the Site 3 Property, Boeing agrees to (a) use its best reasonable efforts to take actions to obtain, and (b) to obtain or, after Boeing transfers title to the Site 3 Property to KCMOFA, to manage the efforts to obtain, a no further action determination. from DOE with respect to the Site 3 Property, provided, however, that after such title transfer, KCMOFA shall use good faith efforts to assist in obtaining such determination if it has not already been obtained. 2. Contaminated Materials. Boeing further agrees that if (a) physical or field screening evidence of soil contamination or groundwater contamination that constitutes Hazardous Materials is encountered at the Site 3 Property during excavation for or construction of the MOF Expansion Project; and (b) Boeing is notified of any such contamination; and (c) the contamination was, as determined in accordance with the Dispute Resolution process specified in Section 14 below, caused by Boeing or its agents (and KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the burden of proof with regard to causation on this issue pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 14), then, Boeing will, at its expense, characterize, process, and dispose of such Hazardous Material in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. C. Environmental lndemnities. 1. Boeing Indemnification Regarding Building 14 -06 Property. Except with respect to matters referred to in Section 8.A, Boeing shall defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA, MOFF and King County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property known to Boeing and as described in the environmental data listed on Exhibit 17 and existing as of the date Boeing transfers such property to KCMOFA; provided that Boeing's obligations pursuant to this Section 8.C.1. shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Building 14 -06 Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA. 2. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification of Boeing and the County Regarding Building 14 -06 Property. Each of KCMOFA and MOFF agree to.defend, indemnify and hold Boeing and the County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to (a) the removal of asbestos or asbestos - containing materials currently located in the Building 14 -06 Property or (b) KCMOFA's demolition of the building currently located on the Building .14 -06 Property or both. KCMOFA and MOFF assume liability for and indemnify Boeing from all responsibility for the activities described in the preceding (a) and (b), including but not limited to all responsibility for any notifications required by law to employees, contractors, assignees or transferees, and all responsibility for abatement and disposal of materials removed under' (a) and (b) in compliance with applicable law, whether at or prior to alteration or demolition. 3. County Indemnification of Boeing and KCMOFA Regarding the Building 14 -06 Property. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Boeing, KCMOFA and MOFF harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property that first become present on the property after the date of transfer of such property to the County; provided that, the County's obligations pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that originate from activities or releases occurring, or the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Building 14 -06 Property arising, before the transfer of the Building 14 -06 Property to the County. 4. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification of County Regarding Exchange Property. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to defend, indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Exchange Property that first become present on the property after the date of transfer of such property to the KCMOFA; provided that, KCMOFA and MOFF's obligations pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that .originate from activities or releases occurring, or the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Exchange Property arising, before the transfer of the Exchange Property to KCMOFA. 5. County Indemnification of KCMOFA and MOFF Regarding Exchange Property. The County agrees to defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA and MOFF harmless- from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials on the Exchange Property existing as of the date of transfer of such property to KCMOFA; provided that the County's obligation pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Exchange Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA. 6. Boeing Indemnification Regarding Site 3 Property. Boeing agrees to defend, indemnify and hold KCMOFA and MOFF harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials that (a) are on the Site 3 Property existing as of the date of the transfer of such property to KCMOFA and (b) were caused by Boeing or its agents (and KCMOFA and MOFF shall have the burden of proof with regard to causation on this issue pursuant to the dispute resolution process set forth in Section 14); provided that Boeing's obligation pursuant to this subsection shall not apply to Hazardous Materials that first become present on the Site 3 Property after the date of transfer to KCMOFA. 7. KCMOFA and MOFF Indemnification . Regarding Site 3 Property. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to defend, indemnify and hold Boeing harmless from and against Environmental Expenses arising out of or pertaining to any Hazardous Materials other than those to which Boeing's indemnification obligation extends pursuant to Section 8.C.6. Section 9. Title Insurance. KCMOFA and the County, at their discretion, may purchase owner's title insurance in form and substance satisfactory to the prospective owner for the property transfers that are provided for in this Agreement. Section 10. County Approvals.: A. County Approval of Reconfiguration. Pursuant to the terms of the 1988 Loan, the County hereby approves the reconfiguration of the kitchen, cafe and meeting room as it relates to and is part of the MOF Expansion Project. B. County Approvals of 1988 Loan Terms. KCMOFA and MOFF will seek County approvals, as required under the terms of the .1988 Loan, of any financing guarantee by MOFF and of any use of loan proceeds toward the MOF Expansion Project. Section 11. Development and Public Benefit Commitments. A. MOF Expansion Project Development. MOFF agrees to design and construct the MOF Expansion Project as described and depicted in Appendix A to this Agreement. In addition: 1. Design and Construction Authority. MOFF shall have full design and construction authority over the MOF Expansion Project. 2. First -Class Aviation and Space Museum.. MOFF commits to design and construct the MOF Expansion Project to be a first -class aviation and space museum, consistent with MOF program requirements. 3. Permits and Approvals. MOFF shall be responsible for obtaining all required permits or approvals for the design and construction of the MOF Expansion Project. 4. Financial Commitments. MOFF and KCMOFA agree to diligently pursue appropriate financial commitments for the MOF Expansion Project. B. Time of Completion of MOF Expansion Project. In recognition -of the significant public benefits that will follow from completion of the MOF Expansion Project, MOFF shall use its best efforts to commence design and construction of the MOF Expansion Project within seven years following the execution of this Agreement, excluding time periods when the design, construction or development of such project is unavoidably delayed by a Force Majeure Event. C. Public Benefit Commitments. KCMOFA and MOFF agree to provide the Public Benefit Commitments. Section 12. Permitting. The Parties agree that the City of Tukwila is in the best position to (a) efficiently review and provide the land use approvals and construction permits associated with the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs and the MOF Expansion Project (including the boundary line adjustment between the T -Hangar A & B Parcel and the County's adjacent land); and (b) coordinate with KCIA and the FAA for such project to assurc that any permitted facilities are satisfactory to KCIA and the FAA. The Parties hereby consent to the City of Tukwila acting as the lead agency in implementing such a land use permitting arrangement. Subject to the City of Tukwila's concurrence, the County agrees to delegate its land use permitting authority for the limited purposes of the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie - downs. Any development involving the Relocation of T- Hangars and Tie -downs shall meet or exceed County standards regarding protection of the public with respect to environmental, health and safety requirements. Section 13. Representations and Warranties. The Parties represent and warrant as follows: A. County Representations and Warranties. The County represents and warrants to the following:. . 1. Valid Existence. King County is a home rule charter county duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washingto:a. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by the County has been duly and validly authorized by ordinance. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of the County, enforceable against the County in accordance with its terms. B. Boeing Representations and Warranties. Boeing represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. Boeing is a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by Boeing has been dilly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of Boeing, enforceable against Boeing in accordance with its terms. C. KCMOFA Representations and Warranties. In consideration of Boeing's entering into this Agreement and as an inducement to Boeing to donate the Building 14 -06 Property and the Site 3 Property, KCMOFA makes the following representations and warranties, each of which is material and is being relied upon by Boeing, and the truth and accuracy of which shall constitute a condition precedent to Boeing's obligations hereunder. KCMOFA represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. KCMOFA is a Washington public development authority duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washington and is a public development authority authorized under RCW § 35.21.730 -.745. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by KCMOFA has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of KCMOFA, enforceable against KCMOFA in accordance with its terms. 3. No Conflict. Neither the incurrence of the obligations set forth herein, nor the consummation of the transaction contemplated herein with respect to KCMOFA, nor compliance with the terms of this Agreement and of the documents and instruments described herein conflicts with or results in the material breach of any terms, conditions, or provisions of, or constitutes a default under, any bond, note, indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, loan, lease or other financing agreement to which KCMOFA is a party. 4. Use of Property. KCMOFA will use the Site 3 Property and the Building 14 -06 Property as 'currently contemplated in connection with the MOF Expansion Project; provided however', that if KCMOFA does not proceed with the MOF Expansion Project as contemplated hereby, the Building 14 -06 Property will be used for Museum Purposes, or in the alternative as "aeronautical property" as defined by the FAA in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook, and the Site 3 Property will be used for Museum Purposes. D. MOFF Representations and Warranties. MOFF represents and warrants the following: 1. Valid Existence. MOFF is a nonprofit corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Washington. MOFF has received a preliminary determination that it is a tax - exempt organization under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. Valid Execution. The execution and delivery of this Agreement by MOFF has been duly and validly authorized by all necessary action. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of MOFF, enforceable against MOFF in accordance with its terms. E. As Is Transfers. All transfers pursuant to this Agreement are subject to the following provisions: 1. All transfers hereunder shall be made without warranties, representations, or guarantees by the transferor of any kind or nature, express or implied, except for the applicable warranties set out in Section 13 and the warranties of title set forth in the applicable deed. 2. Except as set forth in the respective indemnification provisions, a transferred property shall be received and accepted by the transferee "AS IS "WHERE "WITH ALL FAULTS" including, without limitation, all physical and environmental matters and conditions, and all other material facts and issues, now or hereafter existing or arising, known or unknown. 3. Any reports, studies, analyses, maps, drawings, materials and other documents provided by one Party to another are only provided as an accommodation with no representation or warranty by the providing Party as to their completeness, reliability, sufficiency, or accuracy and not with the intent that any such documents be relied upon by any Party, except to the extent that such Party has independently confirmed the validity, reliability, and sufficiency of any such documents and the information contained in them. 4. A transferee's decision to receive and accept the a property hereunder is based solely on the investigation, study, and analyses of all aspects of such properties as made by the transferee and its agents, employees, representatives, attorneys, advisors, and independent contractors. 5. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, it is expressly understood and agreed by the Parties that all statements and representations concerning a property made by a Party or its agents and independent contractors (a) were and are intended and understood by all Parties to be made only as a convenience and not in lieu of a Party's investigation and (b) were and are not to be relied or acted on by any party. Section 14. Dispute Resolution. In the event of a contractual dispute between or among any of the Parties regarding this Agreement, the affected parties shall attempt to resolve the matter informally. If the affected parties are unable to resolve the matter informally, the matter shall be forwarded for discussions by the County Executive, the General Counsel for Boeing, and the MOFF Board Chairperson or their respective designee(s). If this process fails to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days after such referral, an affected Party may submit the matter to a nonbinding, structured mediation procedure fashioned by persons or organizations experienced in alternative dispute resolution ( "ADR ") procedures. The mediation may be requested by any party and shall be initiated within thirty (30) days from the date of the request unless extended by agreement of the affected parties. The alternative dispute resolution procedures utilized for the mediation shall include the exchange of written claims and responses, with supporting information, at least seven (7) days prior to the actual mediation. The positions expressed and mediator's recommendations shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent ADR or legal proceeding. If the matter is submitted to mediation and the matter is not resolved, an affected Party shall be entitled to pursue any legal remedy available. Section 15. Miscellaneous Provisions. A. No Joint Venture. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as creating a joint venture or any other partnership between any of the Parties. B. Successor Bound. The covenants, terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective successors and, to the extent permitted herein, assigns. C. Words of Limitation. Whenever the words "including," "including but not limited to," "such as" or "by way of example" or any other similar prefatory words are used in this Agreement, such words shall be deemed to preface an example or list of examples, which examples are set forth for informational purposes only and not for purposes of limitation. D. Captions and Headings. The captions and headings throughout this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and the words contained therein shall in no way be held or deemed to define, limit, describe, explain, modify amplify or add to the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provisions of this Agreement or the scope or intent thereof, nor in any way affect this Agreement. E. Plural/Singular. Wherever appropriate herein, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular. F. Execution oLCounterparts. This Agreement may be contemporaneously executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same instrument. G. No Third Party Beneficiary. The Parties understand and agree that the enforcement of the terms and conditions' of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the Parties, or their successors or assigns, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any third person or entity whatsoever on such Agreement. It is the express intention of the Parties that any person or entity other than the Parties, or their successors or assigns, receiving services or benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed to be an incidental beneficiary only. H. Amendment; Waiver. No alteration, amendment or modification hereof shall be valid unless executed by an instrument in writing by each of the Parties hereto with the same formality as this Agreement. The failure of the Parties to insist in any one or more instances upon the strict performance of any of the covenants, agreements, terms, provisions or conditions of this Agreement or to exercise any election herein contained shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future of such covenant, agreement, term, provision, condition, election or option, but the same shall continue -and remain in full force and effect. No waiver by a Party of any covenant, agreement, term, provision or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed to have been made unless expressed in writing, duly authorized as provided by law and signed by an appropriate official on behalf of the Parties. The payment by any Party of sums due and payable hereunder; with knowledge of the breach of any covenant, agreement, term, provisions or condition herein contained, shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach. I. Notice Provisions. Any notice under this Agreement must be in writing and be personally delivered, delivered by recognized overnight courier service or given by mail. Any notice given by mail must be sent postage prepaid, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. All notices must be addressed to the parties at the following address or at such other addresses as the parties may from time to time direct in writing: County: with a copy to: King County Executive King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room 400 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Ron Sims Fax: (206) 296 -0194 King County Prosecutor's Office King County Courthouse 516 Third Avenue, Room W554 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: Sally Tenney Fax: (206) 296 -9013 Boeing: with a copy to: with a copy to: President, Boeing Realty Corporation 3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 500 Long Beach, CA 90806 Attn: Mr. Philip Cyburt Fax: (562) 627 -4906 The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 MC 2R -79 Seattle, WA 98124 Attn: Richard Arscott Fax: (206) 544 -7447 The Boeing Company Office of the General Counsel P.O. Box 3707 MC 13 -08 Seattle, WA 98124 Attn: Heather Howard Fax: (206) 544 -2020 KCMOFA and MOFF: Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: Chair, MOFF Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 with a copy to: King County Museum of Flight Authority c/o Museum of Flight Foundation 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Attn: President, KCMOFA Board Fax: (206) 764 -5707 Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 Attn: B. Gerald Johnson Fax: (206) 623 -7022 Any notice will be deemed to have been given, if personally delivered, when delivered, and if delivered by overnight courier service, one (1) business day after deposit with the courier service, and if mailed, upon receipt. J. Statutory Disclaimer. KCMOFA is organized pursuant to King County Ordinance 7444 and RCW 35.21.660, 35.21.670, and 35.21.730 -.755. RCW 35.21.750 provides as follows: "[A]11 liabilities incurred by such public corporation, commission, or authority shall be satisfied exclusively from the assets and properties of such public corporation, commission or authority and no creditor or other person shall have any right of action against the city, town, or county creating such corporation, commission, or authority on account of any debts, obligations, or liabilities of such public corporation, commission, or authority." DATED this3 /day ofnpk, r , 2001. KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware Washington municipal corporation co . oration Its xecutiv Approved as to Form: By KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority By Its ? jz err' i is MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation EXHIBIT 1 BUILDING 14 -06 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST W.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY, SAID POINT BEING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 351.24 FEET ALONG SAID MARGIN FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF HENRY VAN ASSELT DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 50 WITH THE EAST MARGIN OF SAID EAST MARGINAL WAY, AS MARKED BY A MONUMENT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF BOEING FIELD, SAID POINT ALSO BEING POINT OF INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY MARGIN WITH THE SHORE LINE OF THE DUWAMISH RIVER, AS ESTABLISHED BY COMMERCIAL WATERWAY DISTRICT NO. 1; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 202.75 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 66°18'57" EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °41'03" WEST PARALLEL TO SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF PARCEL B OF A TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO FRIDAY, INC., BY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5286620; THENCE SOUTH 66 °18'57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 149 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY; THENCE SOUTH 23 °41'03" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY MARGIN, A DISTANCE OF 259 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF A LINE 500 FEET WESTERLY OF, AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF BOEING FIELD; AND EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF LYING WITHIN THE KING COUNTY AIRPORT BOUNDARY AS DESCRIBED IN DECREE OF APPROPRIATION RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5032254, AND AS CONVEYED TO KING COUNTY UNDER DEEDS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 5134399 AND 5399334; THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, COUNTY OF KING, STATE OF WASHINGTON. Exh. 1 -1 EXHIBIT 2 LOT 13 AND LOT 14 PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS Lot 13: THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS . MONUMENT "D" AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY COORDINATE OF X = 1,637,871.14. Y = 195,351.46; THENCE SOUTH 72°48'11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF SAID AIRPORT; THENCE NORTH 53 °06'55" WEST 40.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28°42'13" WEST PARALLEL WITH SAID RUNWAY, 381.58 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 262.86 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22°32'06" WEST ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 336.31 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2914.14 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 462.89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 °54'55" EAST A DISTANCE OF 211.51 FEET TO A . POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE CHAIN-LINK FENCE; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42' 13" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE CHAIN-LINK FENCE, PARALLEL TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 818.83 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 182,468 SQUARE FEET, ±4.190 ACRES MORE OR LESS EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF LAND AS RELINQUISHED BY THE BOEING COMPANY TO KING COUNTY AS DESCRIBED IN AMENDMENT #25, DATED 1996; SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINING 13,859 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. Exh. 2 -1 Lot 14: THAT PORTION OF KING COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (BOEING FIELD) IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., CONVEYED TO THE BOEING COMPANY BY KING COUNTY BY LEASE No. 11 (1965), 2A (1963), AND 2B (1994), DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT DESIGNATED AS MONUMENT "D" AND HAVING A U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY COORDINATE OF X = 1,637,871.14. Y = 195,351.46; THENCE SOUTH 72°48'11" WEST 229.73 FEET TO A POINT 425 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO, THE CENTERLINE OF THE MAIN RUNWAY OF SAID AIRPORT AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST 24.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST, AND PARALLEL WITH THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MAIN RUNWAY, A DISTANCE OF 488.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 61 °17'55" WEST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 61.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 61 °17'55" EAST 77.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 146.39 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'45" WEST RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 60 FEET NORTHWESTERLY OF, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, TO THE CENTERLINE OF AN ACCESS TAXIWAY A DISTANCE OF 375.10 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN 257.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 149.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, PARALLEL WITH SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN, 259.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 °27'54" WEST, 149.00 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN; THENCE NORTH 22 °32'06" WEST, ALONG SAID MARGIN, 590.69 FEET; THENCE NORTH 67 °27'54" EAST, AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID MARGIN 262.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 °42'05" EAST 381.58 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 °06'55" EAST 40.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING AN AREA OF 309,048 SQUARE FEET, ±7.095 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO A 10 FOOT EASEMENT FOR SEWER, SAID EASEMENT BEING PARALLEL TO THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND LYING EASTERLY AND ADJACENT THERETO. Exh. 2 -2 M 5k L M im BOEIttIG SHARED SERVICES GROUP FACIUTlf SERVICES - SEATTLE DISTRICT PO NVIIIIMM.1 • ON 1 1 t r tnia ..tA , Ma rrr�.wt 801.141.111 Kt R• 10 Lel WIN LOTutr ae.a....ht. 1. 4 LOT LVT .s.,b..- ...... 13 ,..W 701170 0.1164 OIL IT. 11.40 10140 n K n w w" t TL s 4S 11210 . w iw.e.r.n i raa,aw .� n. spa i - •- SAO Mw 11110 ._ --- r -11___11 ___Y .._�_�_nr- -=- 'C - pal Mann %i7 TO u IY A r-/ 7 wAAaxl la[ IOMO 0001 ITT 01T1101ATIOSAJ. MRPORT AOtaIS FItLb EXHIBIT 3 MOF CORE FACILITY PROPERTY DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, . THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 23 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88° 18'47" WEST 613.56 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 891.19 FEET ALONG SAID. NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO SAID SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 88 °04'53" EAST 37.35 FEET ALONG St-LID SOUTH LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 459,918 SQUARE FEET (10.56 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 3 -1 MARG INAL WAY S. BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFOCBRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1'200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED DCN DATE 8/10/01 M.O.F. PARCEL DESCRIPTION TUKWILA WASHINGTON Exhibit 4 T- HANGAR RELOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION SCOPE OF WORK MOFF will be responsible for the following work, in accordance with the Construction Management Agreement Between the Museum of Flight and King County, unless otherwise provided or amended pursuant to such agreement. This is a preliminary summary of agreed terms; the final scope of work, budget, plans and specifications will be completed between King County and the MOFF representatives in accordance with the Construction Management Agreement. 1. Site Assessment ■ Conduct the land Survey of Lot 14 Property and Building 14 -06 Property. • Complete the geotechnical study of Lot 14 Property and Building 14 -06 Property. • Undertake appropriate planning reviews with KCIA administrator or designees. • KCIA is to provide appropriate environmental site assessments for Lot 14 Property. 2. Design • KCIA will complete the designs for the construction of a new T -Hangar A, and the relocation of the existing T -Hangar B. All design work will be performed and approved by KCIA. • Permit the MOF Expansion Project through the City of Tukwila, in accordance with the Interlocal Agreement Between King County and the City of Tukwila Relating to Processing of Building and Land Use Permit Applications and SEPA. • Obtain approval of the plans for demolition, relocation and construction, with KCIA administrator's cooperation, from FAA (FAA 7460). -" 3. Construction • Negotiate and pay for the construction work contract with MOFF contractor. • Remove hazardous material from Building 14 -06 and Building 14 -06 Property. • Dispose of all asbestos and other contaminated or hazardous materials located in or removed from the Building and the immediate environs at a permitted facility. • Demolish Building 14 -06 and existing wheel stops on site. • Remove or terminate utilities under.. Building 14- 06. footprint. . _. • Install new utilities, as required, in support of T- Hangars A & B. • Install new foundations for T- Hangars A & B, and extensions if funded by the KCIA. • Construct a new T- Hangar A and relocate T -Hangar B from the T -Hangar A & B Parcel to new foundations at the Lot 14 Property. • Install or reconnect electrical and mechanical services, and upgrade hangars to applicable codes as required. Patch, repair and replace asphalt pavement at existing hangar sites, as required. • Grade and install new asphalt pavement and tie downs around new T- Hangars A and B sites to existing taxiways. • Review the storm drainage system discharge, which will remain as is except for potential storm sewer outfall relocation. • Install tie downs for small aircraft adjacent to the Museum of Flight as agreed by the KCIA administrator. • Add additional tiedown spaces for transient aircraft at the Museum of Flight, the final numbers to be determined by the MOF designers and KCIA. • Complete the pavement striping and tie -down configuration per KCIA- approved design. • Install a chain link security fence and electrically operated gates per KCIA- approved design for full security between the Museum and the airport property and easements, as well at the Lot 14 Property. • Provide pavement for parking heavy aircraft on the existing T -Hangar A and B Parcel or on the MOF Core Facility in a manner to allow access of other users of the adjacent airport property (as defined by multi -use easement). • Restore electrical service to Hangar C — E as needed. • Provide appropriate construction warranties on all new work on T -Hangar A, and assure the relocated T -Hangar B is relocated in a condition that meets or exceeds its current condition and meets all applicable codes. MOF will be responsible for relocation and completion of the T -Hangar B to these standards. • Identify and locate temporary space for the benefit of tenants currently in Hangars A and B, and pay the costs of temporary replacement hangar space of displaced tenants of Hangars A and B, if any, during the construction and relocation of these hangars. • Construct a replacement wash pad and drain system at a location to be agreed upon between the MOF and KCIA administrator. • Finalize the landscaping around the new hangar sites as agreed between the KCIA administrator and the MOF representatives. NOTE: Phase II site development for balance of Lot 14 to be provided for in separate agreement between MOFF and KCIA. EXHIBIT 5 SITE 3 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; Thence along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning (Being known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an easement for access and utility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast comer of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly right -of -way line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein - described strip -of -land; Exh. 5 -1 Thence, leaving said Westerly right -of -way line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; Thence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment; Thence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; Thence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment the terminus of the herein- described centerline. DEPICTION OF SITE 3 PROPERTY SUBDIVISION OF THE S.112 OF SECTION 33 ,VENUE SOUTH 32 2 2 FAX . LAND PtANNHC, DNUE TM SEDGES %4 de% 7 r 0 11 0 \Z S. 33 Scale r-600' • - - 1 DRAWN BY SRF DATE 12/11/00 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED BY. FMH JOB NO 7416 RECORD OF SURVEY / BOUNDARY LINE_ADJUSTMENT rOR: BOEING REALTY CORPORATION PORTIONS of the J. Buckley Donation Land Claim No. 42, Moore's Five Acre Tracts, Recorded in Vol. 9, of PLATS, Pg. 28 In the S.W1 /4 of the S.E.1 /4 & the S.E1 /4 of the S.W.1 /4 of SECTION 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian City of TUKWILA KING County State of WASHINGTON SEE SHEET 2 of 2 for SURVEY INFORMATION SH EXHIBIT 6 T— HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 262.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 582.44 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE SOUTH 22 °31'55" EAST 248.69 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88°18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 613.56 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 135,629 SQUARE FEET (3.11 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Each. 6 -1 08/28/01 Geo Engineers June 29, 2001 Museum of Flight 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, Washington 98108 Attention: Bob Ormsby Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists GeoEngineers is pleased to submit four copies of our report entitled "Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Museum of Flight Property, 9404 Fast Marginal Way South, Seattle, Washington." Our services were completed in general accordance with our proposals dated March 13 and April 19, 2001 (Appendix A). Our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) services were verbally authorized on March 13 and our Phase II ESA services were authorized on April 25, 2001 by Bob Ormsby. We appreciate the opportunity to assist Museum of Flight on this project. Please contact us if you have questions regarding this report. TMK: B P P: D AC: KRF: sg: pb P: \8\ 8039003 \01\Finals \803900301Phase 1 &2 R -s.doc GeoEngineers, Inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart St., Suite 1420 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone (206) 728 -2674 Fax (206) 728 -2732 www.geoengineers.com Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. David A. Cook Senior Project Manager Kurt R. Fraese Principal CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1 1.1.1 Phase I ESA 2 1.1.2 Phase II ESA 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 2.1 INVOLVED PARTIES 3 2.2 LOCATION, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SETTING 3 2.3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 4 2.3.1 Summary of Observations 4 2.3.2 Findings 6 2.4 ADJACENT PROPERTY AND VICINITY OBSERVATIONS 6 2.5 PREVIOUS REPORTS 7 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW 7 3.1 DATABASE SEARCH 7 3.2 REVIEW OF REGULATORY FILES 8 3.3 FINDINGS 9 4.0 SITE HISTORY 9 4.1 HISTORICAL RESOURCES 9 4.2 HISTORICAL SITE USE SUMMARY 10 4.3 ADJACENT PROPERTIES 10 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS 10 4.5 FINDINGS 11 5.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 11 5.1 GENERAL 11 5.2 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY 11 5.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 11 5.4 FINDINGS 12 5.5 REVIEW OF SHANNON & WILSON'S SITE BORING LOGS 12 6.0 CONCLUSIONS 13 7.0 LIMITATIONS 13 TABLES Figure No. SOIL CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA 1 GROUND WATER CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA 2 FIGURES Figure No. VICINITY MAP 1 SITE AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES 2 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA SOUTH SOIL BORINGS 3 CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA NORTH SOIL BORINGS 4 G e o En g i n e e r s i File No. 8039 -003 -01- 1150/062901 CONTENTS (continued) APPENDICES Page No. APPENDIX A PROPOSALS APPENDIX B EDR REPORT APPENDIX C HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTS APPENDIX D GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY REPORT APPENDIX E FIELD PROCEDURES E -1 DRILLING PROGRAM E-1 GENERAL E-1 DRILLING AND SOIL SAMPLING E -1 FIELD SCREENING OF SOIL SAMPLES E -1 APPENDIX E FIGURES Figure No. SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM E -1 KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS E -2 LOG OF BORING E- 3...E -15. APPENDIX F CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM F -1 SAMPLES F-1 ANALYTICAL DATA REVIEW F-1 DATA QUALITY EXCEPTION SUMMARY F -1 APPENDIX G REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE G -1 G e o E n g i n e e r s 11 File No. 8039- 003 -01- 1150/062901 PHASE I /PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT MUSEUM OF FLIGHT PROPERTY 9404 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON FOR MUSEUM OF FLIGHT 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report summarizes the results of our Phase UPhase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Museum of Flight (MOF) property located at 9404 East Marginal Way South, in Seattle, Washington (referred to herein as the "site "). The property currently is occupied by the Museum of Flight museum (display of airplanes and history of flight). The site is shown relative to surrounding physical features in Figure 1. The general site layout and surrounding property use are shown in Figure 2. Soil boring locations are shown in Figure 3. Our study was completed at the request of Bob Ormsby on behalf of the King County Museum of Flight Authority (KCMOFA) and the Museum of Flight Foundation (MoFF). We understand that MOF currently owns the site. We further understand that the results of this Phase I/Phase II ESA will be used by MOF as part of their evaluation of potential environmental liabilities associated with expansion of the Museum on this property. We also understand that the Museum expansion will extend onto the King County property to the north and the Boeing property to the west. GeoEngineers has conducted Phase I and/or Phase II ESAs of these properties as part of the Museum expansion evaluation. Information related to these properties are described in separate reports. 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of this Phase I/Phase II ESA is to (1) identify recognized environmental conditions' (RECs) in connection with the property, and (2) identify the locations of, and evaluate the potential environmental impact from, gasoline service station facilities formerly located at the site. Evaluation of the former service station locations was the primary focus of our study. GeoEngineers' scope of services for the Phase I portion of this ESA was completed in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E1527 -00 for Phase I ESAs with one exception described in Section 1.2. GeoEngineers' qualifications for performing Phase I ESAs are contained in our proposal dated March 13, 2001 included in Appendix A. Our scope of services for the Phase I/Phase II ESA is as follows: 1 Recognized Enviromnental Conditions are defined in ASTM E- 1527 -00 as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, ground water or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies." G e o E n g i n e e r s 1 File No. 8039-003-01-1150/062901 1.1.1 Phase 1 ESA 1. Review readily available geotechnical reports, environmental reports and/or other relevant documents pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site. 2. Review the results of a federal, state and local environmental database search provided by a subcontracted environmental data service for listings of known or suspected environmental problems at the site or nearby properties within the search distances specified by ASTM. 3. Review regulatory agency files regarding listed sites of potential environmental concern relative to the subject site. 4. Identify a key site manager with specific knowledge of past and present site use and request that he or she meet a GeoEngineers representative on site for an interview during the visual site reconnaissance. Interview the key site manager by phone if they are not available during the site reconnaissance. Interview others familiar with past and present uses of the site and its vicinity, as necessary. 5. Interview a representative of the local fire department, health department, and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) regarding the history of the subject site and surrounding properties relative to the likely presence of hazardous substances. 6. Review historical aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, city directories, chain -of -title reports and tax assessor records, as available and appropriate, to identify past development history on and adjacent to the site relative to the possible use, generation, storage, release or disposal of hazardous substances. Attempt to identify uses of the site from the present to the time that records show no apparent development of the site, or to 1940, whichever is earlier. 7. Review current USGS topographic maps to identify the physiographic setting of the site. 8. Attempt to identify the source(s) of potable water for the site and the current heating and sewage disposal system(s) used at the site, if any. Inquire about the age of the heating and sewage system(s), if present. 9. Provide a statement on the local geologic, soil and ground water conditions based on our general experience and sources such as geologic maps and soil surveys. 10. Conduct a visual reconnaissance of the site and adjacent properties to identify visible evidence of RECs., 1.1.2 Phase 11 ESA 1. Subcontract and coordinate a subsurface geophysical survey of the area between the Great Gallery, the Red Barn and East Marginal Way South. The objective of the geophysical survey was to locate possible USTs from former service station operations. 2. Subcontract and coordinate a utility check of the site using the one -call service and a private utility locating service. 3. Prepare a site safety plan for use by GeoEngineers field representatives. 4. Monitor the drilling of 13 exploratory borings on -site using direct -push drilling equipment to depths between approximately 12 to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). Obtain soil samples C i e o En g i n e e r s 2 File No. 8039 -003 -01 - 1150/062901 at approximately 2- foot -depth intervals from the exploratory borings for field screening to check for evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons or solvents. 5. Submit one or two soil samples from each boring (up to 18 soil samples total), one -time grab ground water samples from two of the borings and a ground water sample from an existing monitoring well for chemical analyses of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylenes (BETX) using EPA Method 8021A, gasoline -, diesel- and heavy oil -range- hydrocarbons using NWTPH -Gx and NWTPH -Dx. Additionally, one soil sample with high field screening results was analyzed for halogenated volatile organic compounds (HVOCs) using EPA Method 8260B and lead using EPA Method 6020. One ground water sample obtained from a boring with significant field screening evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons also was analyzed for HVOCs. 6. Review boring logs completed by Shannon & Wilson for field screening evidence of soil or ground water contamination in geotechnical soil boring B -1 recently installed at the site. 7 Evaluate the field and laboratory data with regard to Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) cleanup regulations. 8. Attend two meetings with MOF. 1.2 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Our scope of services did not include an environmental compliance audit, an evaluation for the presence of lead -based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in light ballasts, radon, lead in drinking water, asbestos - containing building materials or urea- formaldehyde foam insulation in on -site structures. Because the primary focus of this study was to identify the locations of, and evaluate the potential impact from gasoline service station facilities formerly located at the site, we did not enter the site buildings during the course of our ESA research. This represents an exception to the Phase I ESA approach described in ASTM E- 1527 -00. 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 INVOLVED PARTIES The site currently is owned by MOF. We understand MOF is considering expanding the current museum facilities to the north and west. 2.2 LOCATION, LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SETTING General site information, property use(s) and environmental setting of the site area are summarized in Table I below. Refer to Figure 1 for a vicinity map and Figure 2 for the layout of the site in relation to surrounding properties. G e o En g i n e e r s 3 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 Table I Site Information Topographic Map U.S. Geological Survey, 7.5 minute Seattle South, Washington topographic quadrangle map dated 1949, photo- revised 1968 and 1973. Quarter /Quarter, Section, Township and Range Southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian Site Address 9404 East Marginal Way, Seattle, King County, Washington Site Legal Description and Tax Parcel Identification number The tax parcel number for the site is 3324049109. Site Approximate Area 10 Acres Site Existing Use Flight museum Geologic Setting Duwamish River Valley Nearest Surface Water Bodies Duwamish River Inlet, Slip #6 approximately 800 feet west Approximate Surface Elevation Approximately 17 feet above mean sea level, based on site survey information. Soil and Geologic Conditions Sand, silt and clay with gravel deposited by the original Duwamish River channel. Depth to Ground Water Within approximately 10 to 16 feet below ground surface based on our observations during drilling. Inferred Direction of Shallow Ground Water Flow To the west, based on the close proximity of the Duwamish River. Our knowledge of the general physiographic setting, geology and ground water occurrence in the site vicinity is based on our subsurface explorations at the site, our review of the map listed above, previous site vicinity reports and our general experience in the area. 2.3 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 2.3.1 Summary of Observations A representative of GeoEngineers performed a visual reconnaissance of the site on April 26, 2001. Bob Ormsby and Richard Beckerman of MOF were identified as "key site managers" with knowledge of the site use, but were unable to meet our representative on site. Our interviews with Bob Ormsby and Richard Beckerman took place during meetings and by phone and are summarized in section 4.0. The site was accessed from East Marginal Way South. Because the main focus of our Phase 1/Phase II ESA was to identify the locations of, and evaluate the potential -impact - from gasoline-service station facilities formerly - located of the site, we did not_ enter-the site buildings ,during-our April-26, 2001 site visit (see-Section Table II below summarizes conditions observed during our site reconnaissance. Section 2.3.2 contains additional details regarding conditions of potential environmental significance observed during our site reconnaissance. The approximate locations of the observed features discussed in this section are shown in Figures 2 through 4. Photographs of the site were taken to document observations made during our reconnaissance. Site photographs are available in our files. G e o E n g i n e e r s 4 File No. 8039 -003 -01 - 1150/062901 Table II Summary of Site Reconnaissance Observations Feature Observed Not Observed Comment, Location and/or Description and other development on site (e.g. pavement, etc.) Structures (existing) X Great Gallery, Red Barn and Cafe Structures (evidence of former) X Heating/Cooling System X Floor Drains, Sumps or Drywells X Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) X Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) or Evidence of USTs X See Section 5.2. Drums or Other Containers X Chemicals or Hazardous Materials (other than de minilnis quantities of cleaning products) X Evidence of Leaks, Spills or Releases Surrounding ASTs, USTs, and/or Chemical Storage Areas X See Section 5.4. Stained or Corroded Floors, Walls or Drains (other than apparent water stains or minor oil stains on pavement from parked vehicles) X Pipes of Unknown Origin or Use X One 2 inch - diameter, eight foot -tall iron pipe with a shut -off valve and screw -off cap was observed along the south wall of the Red Barn. No anomalies were detected in this vicinity during the geophysical study (Section 5.2). On -site Septic System X Sewage Disposal System X City of Tukwila Potable Water Supply X City of Tukwila Solid Waste Refuse Dulnpsters X Hydraulic Hoists X Oil/Water Separators X All water collected at Boeing Field including the site is routed to two large oil/water separators. The closest Boeing Field oil/water separator is located approximately 1/4 mile north of the site. Discolored or Stained Soil or Vegetation Potentially from Hazardous Substances X Hazardous Waste Disposal Areas X Ci e o En g i n e e r s 5 File No. 8039-003-01-1150/062901 Feature Observed Not Observed Comment, Location and/or Description and other development on site (e.g. pavement, etc.) Uncontained Debris, Refuse or Unidentified Waste Materials X Standing Water or Other Liquids X Catch Basins and Storm Water Drainage X See Figures 2 through 4 Pits/Ponds/Lagoons X Waste or Wastewater Discharges X Unusual Odors X Stressed Vegetation X Fill Material X Water Wells (agricultural, domestic, monitoring) X Two geotechnical monitoring wells were installed at the site by Shannon & Wilson (Figures 2 through 4). Pad - Mounted Transformers X Pole- Mounted Transformers X Other Conditions of Environmental Concern X 2.3.2 Findings No known or suspect environmental conditions were identified by this portion of the study. However, a subsequent geophysical survey and Phase II ESA exploration suggested the potential presence of USTs at the site andtconfirmed'the presence'ofrsoil-and ground : water contamination by petroleum hydrocarbons: beneath portions of the,site ;(see Sections:-5'.2 -and 5- .4-for details). 2.4 ADJACENT PROPERTY AND VICINITY OBSERVATIONS 2.4.1 Summary of Observations We viewed properties located adjacent to and surrounding the site on April 26, 2001 from accessible public rights -of -way and the site. We did not enter adjacent properties or buildings. The site generally is situated in an area that is developed with commercial and industrial facilities. Section 2.4.2 contains additional details regarding conditions of potential environmental significance during our site reconnaissance observations of adjacent properties. Table III below outlines adjacent land uses and pertinent observations with respect to conditions that could pose a REC on the subject site. Figure 2 shows adjacent property uses and locations in relation to the site. G e o En g i n e e r s 6 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 Table III Adjoining Streets and Adjacent Properties Observations Direction Adjoining Street Position Relative to Site2 Adjacent Property and Use Comments North None Crossgradient King County International Airport Airpark Hangars A (9240) and B (9250) See GeoEngineers' Phase I ESA report for this property dated May 23, 2001. South None Crossgradient Driveway, parking and historic airplane storage East None Upgradient King County International Airport/Boeing Field tarmac and runway. West East Marginal Way South Downgradient Boeing Developmental Center See GeoEngineers' Phase I and Phase II ESA reports for this property dated May 22, 2001 and March 12, 2001, respectively. 2.4.2 Findings No known or suspect environmental conditions were identified by this portion of the study on adjacent properties to the south or east. See GeoEngineers' reports listed in Table III for a summary of known or suspect environmental conditions on adjacent properties to the north and west. Adjacent properties located to the north and west are located in an inferred down- or crossgradient position relative to the site and are unlikely to pose a potential environmental concern to the site, in our opinion. 2.5 PREVIOUS REPORTS Our research did not identify prior geotechnical or environmental reports pertaining to the site. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS REVIEW 3.1 DATABASE SEARCH GeoEngineers reviewed the results of a search of pertinent environmental regulatory lists and databases for current or previous facilities listed at addresses located within ASTM - specified distances from the subject site. The information reviewed was provided by a subcontracted regulatory list search service, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The EDR report is presented in Appendix B. The report includes details regarding the listed facilities identified and maps showing the approximate locations of the listed facilities relative to the site. GeoEngineers reviewed the search results for listings pertaining to the subject site. GeoEngineers also reviewed EDR's listing of database entries that could not be mapped by EDR 2 The inferred shallow ground water flow direction in the site vicinity is to toward the west as described in Section 2.2. G e o E n g i n e e r s 7 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 because of insufficient addresses (orphans). Off -site facilities found within the specified distances from the site were evaluated for potential impact to the site. The subject site was not listed on any of the regulatory lists that we reviewed based on the EDR report. Table IV below summarizes adjacent listed facilities that in our opinion required additional explanation for the purposes of this report. Other listed facilities identified in Appendix B either are located a significant distance from the site or are located in an inferred down- or crossgradient position relative to the site and are unlikely to pose a potential environmental concern to the site, in our opinion. Table IV Summary of Regulatory Database Search Listings of Potential Environmental Concern Location Listed Business Listed Address Regulatory Database Description Adjacent west Boeing Drum 9725 East Marginal Way, Gate J28 RCRA -small quantity generator No violations were found for the facility. Therefore, Ecology records were not reviewed. Adjacent west Boeing Developmental Center — Building 9 -101 9725 East Marginal Way Washington Independent Cleanup report, C & SCS, RCRA -large quantity generator, CORRACTS Soil and ground water impacted by halogenated organic compounds, halogenated solvents, non- halogenated solvents, petroleum products, metals and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Interim cleanup report received by Ecology. Sixteen violations were reported at this facility. Awaiting site hazard assessment. The site has been delisted from CERCLA. Ecology records were not reviewed because the facility is located downgradient in relation to the site. Crossgradient, Approximately 500 feet north Boeing King County Airport Office 9010 East Marginal Way South RCRA -small quantity generator No violations found at this facility. Therefore, Ecology records were not reviewed. 3.2 REVIEW OF REGULATORY FILES Because we did not identify listed facilities that are REC's to the subject site (see below), we did not review regulatory files for the facilities listed in Appendix B. Ci e o En g i n e e r s 8 File No. 8039 -003 -01 - 1150/062901 3.3 FINDINGS We did not identify listed facilities that in our opinion represent a REC to the subject site. 4.0 SITE HISTORY 4.1 HISTORICAL RESOURCES Our understanding of the history of the site is based on a review of the information from the historical resources listed in Table V and interviews with the individuals listed. Copies of selected historical research documents are provided in Appendix C. Table V Historical Resources Reviewed Description Provider or Interviewee Dates of Coverage or Dates of Site Knowledge Date Reviewed or Contacted Comment (See Section 4.2 for findings) Historical Walker & 1936, 1946, 1956, 03/14/01 Historical aerial photographs Aerial Associates in 1977, 1985 and indicate that several generations Photo- graphs3 Tukwila, Washington and EDR 1990 of gasoline service stations were located at the site. Historical EDR search of 1929, 1949 and 03/14/01 A gasoline service station or Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn maps 1966 auto repair shop is shown on each of the Sanborn maps listed. Historical Puget Sound 1938 to 1973 03/14/01 Historical tax assessors records Tax Regional indicate that several generations Assessors Archives -King of gasoline service stations Records County were located at the site. Historical EDR search at 1970, 1975, 1980, 03/14/01 None. City public libraries 1985, 1991 and Directories 1999 Interview Bob Ormsby, MOF Expansion Project Recent Interviewed on multiple occasions between None. Manager, and March and Richard May 2001 Beckerman, MOF Executive Interview No Gregov, Great Gallery Architect Recent 03/23/01 No indicated that two USTs were removed from the current location of the concrete benches (Figure 3) during construction . of the Great Gallery. 3 The scale of the photographs reviewed allowed for an interpretation of general site development/configuration, such as identifying most structures, roadways and clearings. However, the scale of the photographs did not allow for identification of specific site features, such as fuel pumps, wells or chemical storage areas on the site, if any. G e o En g i n e e r s 9 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 Description Provider or Interviewee Dates of Coverage or Dates of Site Knowledge Date Reviewed or Contacted Comment (See Section 4.2 for findings) Interview City of Tukwila - Utilities Recent 04/16/01 None. Interview Tukwila Fire Department Recent 04/16/01 The fire department files its records chronologically, not by site address. Therefore, site information could not be referenced. 4.2 HISTORICAL SITE USE SUMMARY Based on our review of available historical information for the site, the site was first developed with a service station located immediately north of the Purcell Avenue and East Marginal Way South intersection between at least 1925 and the early 1980s. It appears that there were multiple generations of service station buildings /facilities, and a tire store and cafe throughout this period at this location with the address of 9422 or 9426 East Marginal Way South. Based on the historic tax assessment records, facilities (type /owner) were constructed at the site in 1925 (gas station/J. Eaton & J. Shorrett), 1941 (cafe /J. Shorrett), 1948 (Serve -U Gasoteria/Clipper Oil Co.), 1955 (tire store with gas pumps/Mathewson, Inc.) and 1967 (Enco/Humble Oil Co.). Historic tax assessment records indicate that the 1925 gas station building and 1941 cafe had "stove" heat. No Gregov, architect of the Great Gallery, indicated during our interview that two underground- :storage -tanks (USTs) were removed from the area immediately north of former Purcell Avenue during construction of the Great Gallery (the current location of the concrete benches between the Red Barn and Great Gallery). He also indicated that no physical: evidence .of:petroleum.contamination was-- ,obser,ved during the UST :removal-and that soiLsamples were not-obtained from the resulting excavation for chemical analysis. The two USTs were presumably associated with the former service stations. Our research indicates that there were at least 10 USTs associated with the service station(s) throughout the years. Purcell Avenue was abandoned in the mid- 1980s. The current museum facilities were constructed during the late 1980s. The approximately locations of former Purcell Avenue and the three of the former service station buildings are shown in Figure 2. 4.3 ADJACENT PROPERTIES Adjacent properties generally have been developed for commercial and industrial uses primarily related to airplanes since about the early 1900s. 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR PROPERTY USE RESTRICTIONS During the course of our research, we did not find that environmental liens had been filed against the site. A copy of the title report for the site was not available during the period of this ESA. G e o En g i n e e r s 10 File No. 8039- 003 -01- 1150/062901 4.5 FINDINGS Known or suspect environmental conditions identified by this portion of the study are listed below. • Gasoline service station and automobile repair facilities (including USTs) formerly located at the site. Petroleum products, solvents and lead are common soil and ground water contaminants associated with service station and automobile repair facilities. • Possible heating oil USTs associated with "stove" heating facilities in at least two of the former site buildings. 5.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND TESTING 5.1 GENERAL Based on the results of our Phase I ESA research, a geophysical survey was conducted to locate possible USTs at the site. Based on the results of the Phase I ESA and geophysical survey, soil borings were completed to evaluate soil and ground water conditions beneath the site. Additionally, GeoEngineers sampled an existing monitoring well (MW -X) and reviewed a boring log for evidence of contamination in a geotechnical boring recently installed at the site by Shannon & Wilson. 5.2 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY Apollo Geophysics of Seattle, Washington conducted a geophysical survey on a portion of the site using electromagnetic and ground - penetrating radar surveying equipment on April 20, 2001. The purpose of the geophysical survey was to identify possible UST locations associated with former service station or heating oil facilities at the site. A GeoEngineers' scientist marked out the area to be surveyed based on the results of our historical research. Based on the results of the geophysical survey, ten possible UST locations were identified at the site in the area between the Great Gallery, the Red Barn and East Marginal Way South. The possible USTs are located in the vicinity of the former service station facilities, as shown in Figures 2 and 3. Apollo Geophysics' "UST Locate" report dated May 15, 2001 is included in Appendix D. 5.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A GeoEngineers' scientist monitored the drilling of 13 direct push soil borings (B -1 through B -13) on April 26, 2001 to depths ranging between approximately 12 to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). The soil borings were located (1) in the proposed south basement excavation area of the planned expansion and vicinity of the possible USTs identified during the geophysical survey, and (2) north of the Red Barn in the proposed north basement excavation area of the planned expansion. Approximate boring locations are shown in Figures 2 through 4. Field procedures, field screening methods and boring/monitoring well logs are included in Appendix E. Soil encountered in the borings generally consisted of fine to medium sand with varying amounts of silt and gravel. Ground water was encountered in the borings at depths ranging between approximately 10 to 16 feet bgs during drilling. G e o En g i n e e r s 11 File No. 8039 - 003 -01 - 1150/062901 GeoEngineers' field screened soil samples at approximately 2 -foot intervals in each of the explorations to the depth of the boring for potential presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. Field screening indicated the presence of possible petroleum hydrocarbons in soil samples obtained from borings B -2, B -3, B-4, B -5, B -6 and B -7. Selected soil samples obtained from the borings were submitted for chemical analysis of BETX using EPA Method 8021A and gasoline -, diesel- and heavy oil- range - hydrocarbons using NTWPH -Gx and NWTPH -Dx. Additionally, one soil sample with significant field screening evidence of organic vapors (B -3 -11.5) was analyzed for HVOCs using EPA Method 8260B and lead using EPA Method 6020. Ground water samples were obtained from temporary monitoring points installed in two of the borings (B -3 and B -6) and from one existing site monitoring well (referred to as "MW -X" for the purposes of this report). The ground water samples were submitted for chemical analysis of BETX and petroleum hydrocarbons. Additionally, the ground water sample obtained from B -3 also was submitted for chemical analysis of HVOCs. 5.4 FINDINGS One or more BETX compound and/or gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels in soil samples obtained from borings B -2, B -3, B-4 and B -6 at depths ranging between 10 and 11.5 feet bgs. BETX and petroleum hydrocarbons either were not detected or were detected at concentrations less than MTCA Method A cleanup levels in the other soil samples analyzed. HVOCs and lead were not detected in the soil sample (B -3 -11.5) tested for these analytes. One or more BETX compound and/or gasoline -range petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels in ground water samples obtained from borings B -3 and B -6. BETX and petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in the other ground water sample (MW -X) analyzed. HVOCs were not detected in the ground water sample (B -3) tested for these analytes. Chemical analytical results are presented in Tables 1 and 2, and in Figures 3 and 4. Laboratory reports and our Quality Assurance /Quality Control (QA/QC) are included in Appendix F. 5.5 REVIEW OF SHANNON & WILSON'S SITE BORING LOGS Shannon & Wilson recently installed several geotechnical soil borings and monitoring wells at the site. GeoEngineers reviewed a log for the Shannon & Wilson boring B -1, located along the south side of the Red Barn, for notations regarding physical evidence (staining or odors) of petroleum hydrocarbon and/or HVOC contamination. The boring log did not indicate that physical evidence of contamination was encountered in boring B -1. The location of boring B -1 is shown in Figure 3. G e o En g i n e e r s 12 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 6.0 CONCLUSIONS GeoEngineers has performed a Phase I/Phase II ESA of the Museum of Flight property located at 9404 East Marginal Way South in Seattle, Washington. The Phase I portion of this ESA was conducted in general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527 -00 with one exception (see Section 1.2). Based on the results of our Phase I/Phase II ESA, the former gasoline service station facilities, possible USTs and associated soil and ground water contamination identified at the site represent REC's for the site. Gasoline- related soil and ground water contamination was detected at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels in portions of the site between the Great Gallery, the Red Barn and East Marginal Way South. Gasoline - related soil contamination at concentrations that exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels appears to be present at depths ranging between approximately 8 to 15 feet bgs in this area, based on field screening and chemical analytical results, and does not appear to extend beneath the Great Gallery or the Red Barn. We estimate that' the volume of gasoline - contaminated soil (class 2, 3 and 4 soil based on Ecology's end use criteria) in this area could be in the range+of 4;700 cubic yards (7,500 tons) based on the results of our study. This soil volume estimate is based on the limited exploration locations and results for this study. The full extent of the contamination encountered has not been assessed and the actual volume of contaminated soil may be less than or exceed this estimate of soil volume. We recommend that MOF include a contingency for removal of petroleum contaminated soil and possible USTs encountered during future basement excavation activities. An UST removal and contaminated soil and ground water handling and disposal plan should be prepared to guide the contractor in the removal and proper disposal of USTs and the petroleum - contaminated soil and ground water encountered during the excavation phase of the redevelopment. Ecology adopted new amendments to the MTCA on February 15, 2001. These changes to the rule are scheduled to take effect on August 15, 2001. Ecology is in the process of developing policies and guidance to address the changes. The amendments include changes to cleanup levels for some contaminants. However, according to the new rule [Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173 - 340 -702 (12)], "In reviewing the adequacy of independent remedial actions, the department shall determine the cleanup level that applies to a release based on the rules in effect at the time the final cleanup action for that release began or in effect when the department reviews the cleanup action, whichever is less stringent." We believe that the less stringent approach is applicable when evaluating the results of this study relative to MTCA because the site characterization activities, which constitute the beginning of a final cleanup action, described in this report were initiated prior to August 15, 2001. 7.0 LIMITATIONS This Phase I/Phase II ESA has been prepared for use by MOF. GeoEngineers has performed this study of the MOF property located 9404 East Marginal Way South in Seattle, Washington in G e o En g i n e e r s 13 File No. 8039- 003 - 014150/062901 general accordance with ASTM E- 1527 -00, Standard Practice for Phase I ESAs and the scope and limitations of our proposals dated, March 13 and April 25, 2001. Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, our services have been executed in accordance with the generally accepted environmental science practices for Phase I/Phase II ESAs in this area at the time this report was prepared. No warranty or other conditions, express or implied, should be understood. Please refer to Appendix G titled "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" for additional information pertaining to use of this report. I o ► We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to Museum of Flight. Please call if you require more information or have questions regarding this report. Respectfully submitted, GeoEngineers, Inc. David A. Cook Senior Project Manager Kurt R. Fraese Principal TM K: BP P: D AC : KRF: sg: pb P: \8\ 8039003 \01 \Finals \803900301 Phase 18c2 R -s.doc Copyright° 2001 by GeoEngineers, Inc. All rights reserved. G e o E n g i n e e r s 14 File No. 8039- 003 -01- 1150/062901 PAFINALS‘803900301Tables-s.xls, Table 1 Soil !, TABLE 2 GROUND WATER CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA' Museum of Flight 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, Washington Sample Number2 B Volatile Organ'c Compounds3 (µg /I) E T Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons4 (mg /I) X Gasoline - Range Diesel - Range Heavy OiI- Range B -35 B-6 MW -X <1 <1 <50 <1 <3 <0.050 <0.250 <0.250 <0.250 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 MTCA Method A Cleanup Level 5 30 20 16 Notes 'Ground water samples were collected on April 26,.2001 Analyses conducted by CCI Analytical Laboratories of Everett Washington:> ... : :: Approximate exploration :locations: are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Analyzed by EPA:Method 8021 B =benzene E. ethylbenzene, T toluene., x.X—x lenes 'Analyzed by Ecology Methods NWTPHG extended or.NWTPH D extended .:::. SThis sample also was analyzed.for halogenated volatileo Appendix F fora complete listing of the analytes tested. 6The MTCA Method A cleanup level applies to the sum of all ranges of petroleum hydrocarbons /l micrograms r leer mgn = milligrams per Utet Shading :indicates concentrations exceed MTCA MICA R':rllodel Toxics Control Act .............................. ............................... dt': :. A POP. OP levels P: \FINALS /803900301 Tables- s.xls, Table 2 GW 0 8039 -003 -0 0 0 0 Park ) KIN INTE AIR • iligh • i j•,'•�•h;,aj• • r. r • \o7J SITE , I I Rainier ;IGolf Ciub •I 13 �i 1 270 outhern \!Heights 0 Parking Area 'Po Drr a In �hia:er 2000 4000 SCALE IN FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 25 FEET Reference: USES 7.5' topographic quadrangle map "Seattle South, Wash." photorevised 1973. Geo ;, Engineers VICINITY MAP FIGURE 1 • _ • • ad Borny P: \8039003 \CAD \01\ 803900301A.DWG EXPLANATION: POSSIBLE UST ▪ BASED ON RESULTS OF - GEOPHYSICAL STUDY — — — — SERVICE STATION BUILT L___-j IN 1925 ---- SERVICE STATION BUILT L____J IN 1948 r---- SERVICE STATION BUILT L____J IN 1957 UST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK Former Service Station Site Boundary ~~~ East Marginal Way South ������ SCALE IN FEET Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in on attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: CAD file ^2001047-01^ °rovided 05 15 01 b Buoh. Roed & Hitohin°o. FIGURE 2 0 0 N O P: \8039003 \CAD \01 \803900301B.DWG o_ a 0 D Red Barn J 5 B -10 8 C 11.5' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 J 0 (n B -3 B E G 11.5' 6,200,' 19.0' <0.1 <0.1 9 MTCA 0.5 20 100 MW Dry B -3 B E X G -- :..120. .::: 230:..''': :' :'890: : :' {.12.0 : :.. MTCA 5 40 20 1 MW Dry SOIL B -1 B G J 3.0'. <0.1 <5 cn 10.0' <0.1 <5 100 MTCA 0.5 100 SOIL B -2 B G 10.0' 13``.':,.,' ?3,200..'. 14.0' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 Removed USTs 1 L J LJ Concrete Benches LJ Great Caller J 5 B -9 B G 11.5' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 J B -6 B G 0 U1 B -4 <0.1 40 7.5' <0.1 <5 11.5' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 J B -6 B G 0 0 15.0' <0.1 40 MTCA 0.5 100 J 5 cn B -7 B G 13.5' <0.1 51 MTCA 0.5 100 J B -8 B G 0 5 11.5' 0.4 <250 '`..',' 320. ::•,...:' (1) 17.0' 0.1 <5 <25 40 MTCA 0.5 100 200 B -8 B E T X G 3 170'. ::.',:.) 1,100':': '`..',' 320. ::•,...:' :4,400'..1,'.:.24.01':: MTCA 5 30 40 20 1 a a a a Site BanoZndary- East Marginal Way South Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. Diesel- and heavy oil -range hydrocarbons were not detected in the soil or ground water samples with the exception of soil sample B -6 -11.5. See Table 1 for details. 3. Shaded concentrations exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels. 4. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: CAD file "2001047 -01" provided 05/15/01 by Bush, Roed & Hitchings. MO a EXPLANATION: POSSIBLE UST BASED ON RESULTS OF GEOPHYSICAL STUDY B -1 + SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY GEOENGINEERS B-1+ SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON MW 9 MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON UST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK B BENZENE -mg /kg (SOIL) OR µg /I (GROUND WATER) E ETHYLBENZENE -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) T TOLUENE -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) X XYLENES -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) G GASOLINE -RANGE HYDROCARBONS - mg/kg (SOIL) OR mg /I (GROUND WATER) D DIESEL -RANGE HYDROCARBONS mg /I (SOIL) MTCA MODEL TOXICS CONTROL ACT METHOD A CLEANUP LEVELS GW GROUND WATER mg /kg MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM mg /I MILLIGRAMS PER LITER jg /I MICROGRAMS PER LITER ® CATCH BASIN 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET Geo � Engineers CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA SOUTH SOIL BORINGS, FIGURE 3 B-8 B G 5 N 12.5' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 a Site BanoZndary- East Marginal Way South Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. Diesel- and heavy oil -range hydrocarbons were not detected in the soil or ground water samples with the exception of soil sample B -6 -11.5. See Table 1 for details. 3. Shaded concentrations exceed MTCA Method A cleanup levels. 4. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: CAD file "2001047 -01" provided 05/15/01 by Bush, Roed & Hitchings. MO a EXPLANATION: POSSIBLE UST BASED ON RESULTS OF GEOPHYSICAL STUDY B -1 + SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY GEOENGINEERS B-1+ SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON MW 9 MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON UST UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK B BENZENE -mg /kg (SOIL) OR µg /I (GROUND WATER) E ETHYLBENZENE -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) T TOLUENE -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) X XYLENES -mg /kg (SOIL) µg /I (GROUND WATER) G GASOLINE -RANGE HYDROCARBONS - mg/kg (SOIL) OR mg /I (GROUND WATER) D DIESEL -RANGE HYDROCARBONS mg /I (SOIL) MTCA MODEL TOXICS CONTROL ACT METHOD A CLEANUP LEVELS GW GROUND WATER mg /kg MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM mg /I MILLIGRAMS PER LITER jg /I MICROGRAMS PER LITER ® CATCH BASIN 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET Geo � Engineers CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA SOUTH SOIL BORINGS, FIGURE 3 0 0 P: \8039003 \CAD \01 \803900301C.DWG • 4 -CPT -1 ',.Cafe., 0 J 5 B -13 B c 8.0' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 /' 0 J B -12 B G 5 10.5' <0.1 <5 N MTCA 0.5 100 0 CPT -2 ® MW -X 0 J 5 B -11 B c 7.5' <0.1 <5 MTCA 0.5 100 Site Boundary — East Marginal Way South Notes: 1. The locations of all features shown are approximate. 2. This drawing is for information purposes. It is intended to assist in showing features discussed in an attached document. GeoEngineers, Inc. cannot guarantee the accuracy and content of electronic files. The master file is stored by GeoEngineers, Inc. and will serve as the official record of this communication. Reference: CAD file "2001047-01" provided 05/15/01 by Bush, Roed & Hitchings. EXPLANATION: B -11- - C P T -1 - - MW -X 0 B G MTCA mg /kg SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY GEOENGINEERS SOIL BORING INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON MONITORING WELL INSTALLED BY SHANNON & WILSON BENZENE— mg /kg (SOIL) GASOLINE —RANGE HYDROCARBONS - mg/kg (SOIL) MODEL TOXICS CONTROL ACT METHOD A CLEANUP LEVELS MILLIGRAMS PER KILOGRAM CATCH BASIN 0 40 80 SCALE IN FEET Geo 4 O Engineers CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL DATA NORTH SOIL BORINGS FIGURE 4 File No. 8039 -003 41 -1150 Geo Engineers Museum of Flight 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, Washington 98108 Attention: Bob Ormsby March 13, 2001 Consulting Engineers and Geoscientists Proposal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Museum of Flight Property - King County T- Hangar South Parcel 9450/9440 & 9400 East Marginal Way Seattle, Washington File No. 8039 -003 & 004-00 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND GeoEngineers is pleased to present this proposal to perform Phase I environmental site assessments (ESA) of the properties located at 9450/9440 and 9400 East Marginal Way in Seattle, Washington. These properties are also known as the Museum of Flight and King County T Hangar properties, respectively. Although this proposal addresses both properties, we understand that the Museum of Flight (MOF) is interested in receiving separate reports summarizing the results of our studies at each site. Currently King County owns the T- Hangar site. We understand that the southern portion of this property likely will be acquired by the MOF. Two T- hangars currently occupy the portion of property that will be acquired. Our Phase I ESA will address only this portion of the T- Hangar site. The objective of this Phase I ESA is to conduct a due diligence review prior to site acquisition. A Phase I ESA was requested for the MOF property because a former gasoline station has been alleged to have been present on this property; north of the existing Red Barn. The objective of the Phase I ESA for the MOF property, is to evaluate this and other recognized environmental conditions that could impact site development. Because significant museum expansion, including excavation, is planned in this area, our Phase I ESA will focus on historical site uses and the likelihood of subsurface contamination by hazardous substances on the MOF property. It is likely that Phase II soil and ground water testing will be necessary on the MOF and/or T- Hangar properties. If evidence is found that a Phase II ESA is necessary, we will notify the MOF, GeoEngneers, Inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart St., Suite 1420 Seattle. WA 98101 Telephone (206) 728 -2674 Fax (206) 728-2732 www.geoengineers.wm Museum of Flight March 13, 2001 Page 2 prepare a proposal for Phase II ESA services and combine the results of subsurface testing into each respective report. This proposal was requested by Bob Ormsby of the MOF on March 8, 2001. SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of the Phase I ESAs is to identify recognized environmental conditions' (RECs) in connection with the properties. Our scope of services is in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard E1527 -00 for Phase I ESAs. Our scope of services for both the MOF and T- Hangar property Phase I ESAs is as follows: 1. Review readily available geotechnical reports, environmental reports and/or other relevant documents pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site. 2. Review the results of a federal, state and local environmental database search provided by an outside environmental data service for listings of known or suspected environmental problems at the site or nearby properties within the search distances specified by ASTM. 3. Review regulatory agency files regarding listed sites of potential environmental concern relative to the subject site. 4. Identify a key person with specific knowledge of past and present site use and request that he or she meet a GeoEngineers representative on site for an interview during the visual site reconnaissance.. Interview the key person by phone if they are not available during the site reconnaissance. Interview others familiar with past and present uses of the site and its vicinity, as necessary. 5. Interview a representative of the local fire department, health department, and/or the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) regarding the history of the subject site and surrounding properties relative to the likely presence of hazardous substances 6. Review historical aerial photographs, fire insurance maps and/or other historical maps, city directories, chain -of -title reports and tax assessor records, as available and appropriate, to identify past development history on and adjacent to the site relative to the possible use, generation, storage, release or disposal of hazardous substances. Attempt to identify uses of the site from the present to the time that records show no apparent development of the site, or to 1940, whichever is earlier. 7. Review current USGS topographic maps to identify the physiographic setting of the site. 8. Attempt to identify the source(s) of potable water for the site and current or previous heating and sewage disposal system(s) used at the site, if any. ' Recognized Environmental Conditions are defined in ASTM E1527 -0O as "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an casting release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into sttvctures on the property or into the ground, ground water or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The Leto is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that geierallY would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies." a e o E n g i n c e r s Fde No. 8039403/00400 -1150 Museum of Flight March 13, 2001 Page 3 9. Provide a statement on the local geologic, soil and ground water conditions based on our general experience and sources such as geologic maps and soil surveys. 10. Conduct a visual reconnaissance of the site and adjacent properties to identify any visible evidence of RECs. 11. Provide a written summary of the Phase I ESA results for each site and identified RECs along with our opinion regarding the potential for contami nation by hazardous substances at the sites. Our proposed scope of services does not include an environmental compliance audit, an evaluation for the presence of lead -based paint, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in light ballasts, radon, lead in drinking water, asbestos - containing building materials or urea - formaldehyde foam insulation in on -site structures. Soil, ground water and/or surface water sampling and associated chemical analysis (typical Phase II ESA), are not included as part of this scope of services. If requested, we can arrange for and provide these services. We request that you provide us with (1) copies of any past reports or documents pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject property, such as permits, previously completed environmental site assessment reports or geotechnical engineering studies, and (2) the names and phone numbers of key individuals with knowledge of site use. Please notify us within five days of any environmental liens (deed restrictions or other institutional controls) encumbering the property or any pertinent knowledge you have regarding environmental conditions at the site or surrounding properties that are not described in this proposal. STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR PHASE I ESAS GeoEngineers has researched and assessed possible subsurface contamination for more than 2,000 projects located in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, California and Alaska- We are experienced with the interpretation of environmental information with regard to potential liabilities associated with property ownership or transfer. We have been involved with property assessments at sites ranging from small commercial properties with no apparent environmental problems to large industrial properties with complex histories. Where necessary, we also provide subsurface exploration programs during Phase II ESAs, develop remedial plans for contaminated properties, and monitor and document remedial activities. Internal guidelines for conducting Phase I ESAs have been developed by our firm. The primary objectives of the guidelines are to be responsible to client needs, standardize our technical approach, facilitate completion of the projects, and maintain project quality and cost control The guidelines are revised as necessary based on reviews of currently applicable regulations, standards and practices generally employed in the consulting industry for Phase I ESAs. Our standard procedures for conducting Phase I ESAs are conducted in general accordance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-97, Standard Practice for Phase I ESAs, unless otherwise specified_ G e o E n g i e e e r s File No. 8039-003/00400-1150 Museum of Flight March 13, 2001 Page 4 GeoEngineers has field and office staff who are trained in performing Phase I ESAs. Historical research is accomplished by sta$ who are experienced with the wide range of documents and databases available for evaluation of historical land use and identification of sites with known or suspected environmental concerns. The site reconnaissance is completed by an experienced member of our staff with capabilities in identifying visual evidence of the possible use, generation, storage, release or disposal of hazardous substances. Kurt Fraese Principal, Dave Cook, Senior Project Manager and Tina King, Environmental Geologist, will have primary responsibility for this Phase I ESA and if necessary, subsequent Phase II ESA project. Mr. Fraese has practiced as a consulting geologist since 1980. He has been responsible for more than 600 projects involving the investigation of actual or potential subsurface contamination. Mr. Cook has completed numerous environmental site characterizations and cleanups in and around Boeing Field and is a lead geologist for GeoEngineers Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) services. He has extensive project management experience and knowledge of the potential impacts to site development Ms. King has extensive experience completing Phase I and II ESAs for sites with residential, commercial and industrial developments. SCHEDULE, TERMS AND BUDGET Our Phase I ESA services will be completed within approximately three weeks after receiving authorization to proceed. The time that it takes to complete a Phase I ESA is highly dependent on the availability of required information from outside sources. Phase II ESA services, if necessary, can be initiated immediately after your review of the Phase I ESA report. As a cost savings measure, we can defer producing a written Phase I ESA report and provide you with a verbal surrunary of our Phase I ESA conclusions and recommendations if a Phase II ESA (soil and ground water sampling and analysis) appears necessary. The written Phase I ESA results would be reported in the Phase II ESA report We will conduct our services on a time- and - expense basis in accordance with the rates and terms described in our attached Schedule of Charges and General Conditions, which are a part of this agreement. Please review the terms of this agreement carefully and contact us with any questions you may have. Note specifically that our professional liability is limited to $50,000 for this project, although higher limits can be negotiated. Our estimated fee for the Phase I ESAs outlined above is outlined below. This estimate is valid for 30 days from the date of this proposal. After 30 days, we reserve the right to revise our proposal and fee estimate if our services have not been initiated. Our fee estimate assumes that our written reports will be issued final without revision. It is possible that our research may indicate a need to modify the scope of services in order to evaluate site history more thoroughly. We will keep you informed of project status and advise you if it appears appropriate to modify the scope and budget. GeoEngineers File No. 8039.003/00440-1150 Museum of Flight March 13, 2001 Page 5 If a lending agency or other parties intend to place legal reliance on the product of our services, we require that those parties indicate in writing their ac mowledgement that the scope of services provided and the general conditions under which the services were rendered, including the limitation of liability, are understood and accepted by them. This is to provide our.firm with reasonable protection against open -ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. A breakdown of our estimated fees is as follows: Service Estimated Fee Phase I ESA MOF Property Phase I ESA South T- Hangar Property Meeting Total Note: This fee estimate assumes that services for both properties will be authorized together. If this is not the case, this fee estimate will require rescoping and budgeting. GeoEngineera . d ► Ric No. 8039-003/004-00.1150 Museum of Flight March 13, 2001 Page 6 We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please call if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Formal authorization for our .services can be provided by returning one signed copy of this agreement. Yours very truly, GeoEngineers, Inc. • David A. Cook Senior Geologist DAC:1Q.F:pb P:1030390031001Fuwals18039 -003&004 OOP -s.doc Attachments Two copies submitted The scope of services and terms described herein are accepted and GeoEngineers, Inc. is authorized to proceed. by Organization *Signature Date Name Printed 'tadvidual with Ong aut ority and responsible for payment of Cs *Engineers, Inc. services. Proprietary Notice. The contents of this document ere proprietary to GeoEngineers, Inc. and am intended solely for use by ow clients and their design teams to evaluate GeoEngineers' capabilities and understanding of project requirements as they relate to performing the services proposed for a specific project Copies of this document or its contents may not be disclosed to any other parties without the prior wrifee ascot of Coma :gineas. Copyright' 2001 by GeoEogineen, Inc. All rights reserved CeoEngiaeers File No. 8059-003!004-004150 GENERAL CONDITIONS DEFINITIONS The words and phrases listed below have the following meanings when used in this Agreement " Agreement" means the complete agreement between Client and GeoEngineers, and consists of all of the following: I) The Proposal, including the Scope of Services contained within it; 2) These General Conditions and its attached Schedule of Charges, as applicable; 3) Any documents expressly incorporated by reference into the Proposal or General Conditions; 4) Any modifications to this Agreement, if m,mmtly agreed to by the parties in writing. "Client" means the individual(s) or entity that has entered into this Agreement with GeoEngineers. " GeoEngineers" means GeoEngineers, Inc., a Washington corporation, and any of its employees, officers and directors. GeoEngineers is sometimes referred to as "us," "we" or "our" throughout this Agreement. "Scope of Services" means the sum total of all of our activities and all of the Instruments of Service undertaken or provided pursuant to this Agreement. "Excluded Services" means those services that we are not providing under this Agreement, which includes any services recommended to Client and which Client chooses not to include in our Scope of Services. INTEGRATED WRITTEN AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and integrated agreement between Client and GeoEngineers and supersedes all prior communications, negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral between the parties. No agreement or understanding varying or extending this Agreement shall bind either party, other than by a subsequent written agreement, signed by Client and GeoEngineers. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY DISCLAIMER GeoEngineers will endeavor to perform its professional services with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by professional consultants practicing in the same discipline at the same time and location. No warranty or guarantee, either express or implied, is made or intended by this Agreement or by any report, opinion, or other Instrument of Service provided pursuant to this Agreement CLIENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND OBLIGATIONS Client will provide GeoEngineers with the following: a description of the property; the locations of any underground utilities, facilities or structures on or adjacent to the property which could impact our work; and the nature and location of any known or suspected hazardous materials that may exist on the property. Client will defend, indemnify and hold GeoEngineers and our agents and subcontractors harmless from any damage to underground utilities, facilities or structures known by Client to exist and not specifically or correctly identified to us. GeoEngineers is neither responsible nor liable for the creation, existence, or presence of any hazardous materials, including asbestos, present at the work site prior to or during the performance of this Agreement, except any hazardous materials generated solely by us, our agents or subcontractors. PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY If included in the Scope of Services, GeoEngineers will assist • Client in obtaining necessary permits and licenses. Client will provide for right of entry and any authorizations needed for us to enter upon property to perform our services under this Agreement. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DISTURBANCE GeoEngineers will take reasonable precautions to minimize surface and subsurface disturbance. However, in the normal course of exploratory work some surface disturbance may occur, the restoration of which is not part of this Agreement unless specifically included in our Scope of Services. DISCOVERY OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES "Unanticipated hazardous substances" are any hazardous substances that may exist at the project site, but which this Agreement does not identify as present and whose existence is not reasonably anticipated. The discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances will constitute a changed condition that will require renegotiation of the Scope of Services or termination of this Agreement. The discovery or suspected discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances may necessitate that we take immediate measures to protect the public health. If we discover unanticipated hazardous substances, we will notify Gee Engincere I of 5 eAadmthfton mAX7rmcrai Gonditiamaa _doe Client as soon as practicable, and will take any and all measures that, in our professional opinion, are justified to preserve and to protect the public health and safety of our personnel. Client will pay the cost of any such additional protective measures. Client is responsible for reporting releases of hazardous substances to appropriate government agencies as required by law. Client waives any claim against GeoEngineers and will indemnify and hold us harmless from any claim, injury or loss arising from the discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances. UNANTICIPATED AND CHANGED CONDITIONS Actual subsurface conditions at other locations may vary from those encountered at the specific locations where GeoEngineers conducts its surveys or explorations. We can only base our site data, interpretations and recommendations on information reasonably available to us. Practical and reasonable limitations on available data will result in some level of uncertainty, and therefore risk, with respect to the interpretation of environmental, geological and geotechnical conditions even when we have followed the standard of care. The discovery of unanticipated or changed conditions may require renegotiation of the Scope of Services or termination of services. GeoEngineers reserves the right to solely determine the continued adequacy of this Agreement in light of any discovery of conditions that were not reasonably anticipated or known at the time of this Agreement. If we determine that renegotiation is necessary, GeoEngineers and Client will in good faith enter into renegotiation of this Agreement to permit us to continue to meet Client's needs. If Client and GeoEngineers cannot agree on new terms, we reserve the right to terminate this Agreement and receive payment from Client for all services performed and expenses incurred up to and including the date of termination. SITE SAFETY GeoEngineers will maintain a safety program for our employees. GeoEngineers specifically disclaims any authority or responsibility for general job site safety and for the safety of persons who are not employed by us. GeoEngineers is not responsible for the job safety or site safety of the general project and is not responsible for compliance with safety programs and related OSHA and state regulations that apply to site contractors or their employees, subcontractors, and agents. Client is independently responsible for requiring that its construction or remediation contractors take responsibility for general job site safety. CONSTRUCTION AND REMEDIATION OBSERVATION The conclusions and recommendations for construction or remediation in our reports are based on limited sampling and the interpretations of variable subsurface conditions. Therefore, our conclusions and recommendations shall be deemed preliminary unless or until we are requested by Client to validate our assumptions and finalize our conclusions and recommendations by pre-construction design documents review and site presence during construction or remediation and have completed such work. If our Scope of Services does not include pre- construction plan review and construction/remediation observation, then any reliance by Client or any other party on our preliminary assumptions, conclusions or recommendations is at the risk of that party and without liability to GeoEngineers. Our job site activities do not change any agreement between Client and any other party. Only Client has the right to reject or stop work of its contractors or agents. Our presence on site does not in any way guarantee the completion, quality or performance of the work by any other party retained by Client to provide field or construction/remediation services. We are not responsible for, and do not have control or charge of, the specific means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or remediation selected by any contractor or agent of Client SAMPLE RETENTION AND DISPOSAL We will discard nonhazardous samples 60 days after they are obtained, unless Client makes prior arrangements to store or deliver the samples. Samples containing hazardous materials regulated under federal, state or local environmental laws are the property and responsibility of Client Client will arrange for lawful disposal, treatment and transportation of contaminated samples at Client's expense, unless Client makes other written agreements regarding their disposal. INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE Reports, field data, laboratory data, analyses, calculations, estimates, designs and other documents prepared by GeoEngineers are Instruments of Service and remain our property. We will retain pertinent records relating to the GeoEngineers Z of 5 P 1thninkoctri aACmeral Car d'rtions- 7AOl.doc services performed for 10 years following submission of any report produced under this Agreement, and will make extra copies of the Instruments of Service available to Client on request for a reasonable fee. Neither Client nor any other party may use the Instruments of Service for additions or alterations to this project, or for other projects, or otherwise outside the scope of this Agreement, without our prior written permission. Client will defend, indemnify and hold GeoEngineers harmless from any claims, damages and expenses arising out of any such reuse unless expressly authorized by GeoEngineers in writing prior to such reuse. Documents that may be relied upon by Client are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that are signed or sealed by us. Files in electronic media format of text, data, graphics or of other types that are furnished by GeoEngineers to Client are only for the convenience of GeoEngineers and Client. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk. Data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise. GeoEngineers shall not be responsible to maintain documents stored in electronic media When transferring documents in electronic media format, we make no representations as to long -term compatibility, usability, or readability of documents resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems, or computer hardware differing from those used by us. We shall not be responsible for any alterations, modifications or additions made in the electronic data by the Client or any reuse of the electronic data by the Client or any other party for this project or any other project without our consent Client shall defend, indemnify and hold us harmless against any claims, damages or losses arising out of the reuse of the electronic data without our written consent and arising out of alterations, modifications, or additions to the electronic data made by anyone other than GeoEngineers. All documents, including the electronic files that are transferred by us to Client are Instruments of Service of GeoEngineers and created for this project only, and no representation or warranty is made, either express or implied, concerning the files and data. BILLING AND PAYMENT We will bill for our services monthly. Payment is due on receipt of the invoice unless otherwise agreed to in writing. A service charge of 1 -1/2% per month applies to any unpaid amounts that are more than 30 calendar days past due. In addition to any past due amount, Client will pay all of our reasonable expenses necessary for collection of any past due amounts including, but not Iimited to, attorneys' fees and expenses, filing fees, lien casts and our staff time. Without incurring any liability to Client, we may either suspend or terminate this Agreement if Client fails to pay any undisputed invoice amounts within 60 calendar days of the invoice date, or if Client states its intention not to pay forthcoming invoices. Such suspension or termination will not waive any other claim against Client. Following such suspension or termination, we may resume work by mutual agreement after payment by Client of all outstanding invoiced amounts and collection expenses. ADJUSTMENT FOR INCREASED COSTS GeoEngineers reserves the right to invoice Client for additional charges incurred in the event of an unanticipated increase in project-related taxes, fees or similar levies; or if GeoEngineers must modify project - related services, facilities or equipment to comply with new laws or regulations or changes to existing laws or regulations that become effective after execution of this Agreement GeoEngineers revises its Schedule of Charges annually. Therefore, we reserve the right to modify our Schedule of Charges applicable to our services if performance of this Agreement extends beyond 12 months, or if changes in the project schedule result in our services extending into the next calendar year. We will notify Client in advance of any increases. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND EXCLUDED SERVICES Our engagement under this Agreement includes only those services specified in the Scope of Services. Client agrees it will not hold us liable for not performing additional services that Client has instructed us not to perform; and Client expressly waives any claim against GeoEngineers resulting from our failure to perform recommended additional services that Client has not authorized us to perform. TERMINATION OF SERVICES Termination for Cause Either party may terminate this Agreement upon at [east seven (7) days written notice, in the event of substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordance with this Agreement through no fault of the GeoEngineers 3 of 5 P:kadm 1\connsca+cener l Ca dlti as- zool4oc terminating party. Such termination is not effective if the failure is cured before expiration of the period specified in the written notice. Upon termination for cause by either party, all invoices for services performed up to the date of termination are immediately due and payable. Termination for Convenience Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 14 days written notice to the other. In the event that Client requests early termination of our services for convenience, we reserve the right to complete such analyses and records as are necessary to place our files in order and to complete a report on the services performed to date. Charges for these termination activities are in addition to all charges incurred up to the date of termination INDEMNIFICATION GeoEngineers will indemnify and hold the Client harmless front and against any claims, liabilities, damages and costs (including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense) arising out of death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of. GeoEngineers, its agents or its employees. For any such claims, liabilities, damages or costs caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of GeoEngineers and the Client, any duty to indemnify shall extend only to the extent of GeoEngineers' negligence. The Client will indemnify and hold GeoEngineers harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages and costs (including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense) arising out of death or bodily injury to persons or damage to property to the extent caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the Client, its agents or its employees. For any such claims, liabilities, damages or costs caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of GeoEngineers and the Client, any duty to indemnify shall extend only to the extent of the Client's negligence. For claims of economic loss or for claims unrelated to bodily injury to persons or damage to property, which arise out of the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Client, Client's agents or employees, Client's contractors, or any other consultant retained by the Client, the Client will indemnify and hold GeoEngineers harmless from and against any such claims, liabilities, damages and costs (including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense). LIMITATION OF REMEDIES GeoEngineers' aggregate liability responsibility to Client, including that of our officers, directors, employees and agents, is limited to $50,000 or the amount of GeoEngineers' fee under this Agreement, whichever is greater. This limitation of remedy applies to all lawsuits, claims or actions, based on allegations of professional errors or omissions, whether identified as arising in tort, contract or other legal theory, when the alleged errors or omissions arise out of or related to our services under this Agreement and any continuation or extension of our services. GeoEngineers may agree, at Client's request, to increase the limitation of remedy amount for professional liability claims to a greater sum in exchange for a negotiated increase in our foe. Any additional charge for a higher limit is consideration for the greater risk assumed by us and is not a charge for additional professional liability insurance. Any agreement to increase the limitation of remedy amount must be made in writing and signed by both parties in advance of the provision of services under this Agreement In the event of bodily injury or property damage claims not related to professional errors or omissions, GeoEngineers shall not be responsible for any loss, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits or conditions of the applicable insurance coverage on the date the claim is made. By entering into this Agreement, CIient acknowledges that this Limitation of Remedies Clause has been reviewed, understood and is a material part of this Agreement, and that Client has had an opportunity to seek legal advice regarding this provision. INSURANCE GeoEngineers maintains Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance as required by state law. We also maintain comprehensive general, auto, professional and environmental impairment liability insurance, and we will provide copies of certificates evidencing these policies which are available for review on request. MUTUAL WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES In no event will either party be liable to the other for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages of any nature arising out of or related to the performance of this Agreement, whether founded in negligence, strict liability, warranty or breach of contract GeoEngineers 4 of 5 PAadminkentractsria2cral Canditioos.2OO1.4oc DISPUTES The parties to this Agreement must refer any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement or its breach to mediation before pursuing any other dispute remedy. Any dispute, claim or controversy not resolved in mediation will be decided in binding arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association at its offices closest to the project site, unless the parties mutually agree to some other dispute resolution forum. This Agreement is governed by and subject to interpretation pursuant to the laws of the State of Washington. The prevailing party in any arbitration or litigation will be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees, legal costs, arbitration fees and other claim- related expenses, including reasonable foes for the time of its personnel CLAIMS ASSISTANCE FOR CLIENT If a construction contractor or other party files a claim against Client, relating to services performed by GeoEngineers and Client requires additional information or assistance to evaluate or defend against such claims, we will make our personnel available for consultation with Client's staff and for testimony, if necessary. We will make such essential personnel available upon reasonable notice from Client and Client will reimburse GeoEngineers for such consultation or testimony, including travel costs, at the rates that apply for other services under this Agreement We will provide services in connection with any such claims pursuant to a written supplement, if necessary, extending this Agreement TIME BAR TO LEGAL ACTION The parties agree that all legal actions by either party against the other concerning our services pursuant to this Agreement or for failure to perform in accordance with the applicable standard of care, however denominated, will become barred two (2) years from the completion of GeoEngineers' services. NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS Nothing in this Agreement or as a consequence of any of the services provided gives any rights or benefits to anyone other than Client and GeoEngineers. All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement are for the sole and exclusive benefit of Client and GeoEngineers and not for the benefit of any other party. Client agrees that it will not provide any data, reports or other information to any third party without the prior written consent of GeoEngineers, and in the absence of such consent, GeoEngineers will have no liability to Client or to any third party for claims resulting from such disclosure. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT OR CLAIMS Neither the Client nor GeoEngineers may delegate, assign, sublet, or transfer the duties, interests or responsibilities set forth in this Agreement, or any cause of action or claim relating to the services provided under this Agreement, to other entities without the written consent of the other party. SURVIVAL These terms and conditions survive the completion of the services under this Agreement and the termination of this Agreement, whether for cause or for convenience. SEVERABIUTY If any provision of this Agreement is ever held to be unenforceable, all remaining provisions will continue in full fore and effect Client and GeoEngineers agree that they will attempt in good faith to replace any unenforceable provision with one that is valid and enforceable, and which conforms as closely as possible with the original intent of any unenforceable provision. GeoEngineers 5 of 5 PAodmin\oontraets1Geaeral Conditions-20014x • FILE No.203 04/25 '01 14:11 ID:r1OFCAMPAIGN FAX:2067687182 NRLit 1 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT 4° '&3 `t - cc) 5 - °1 S1GN ^; f Capital Campaign Facsimile Date: 04/25/01 rages: 1 of 14 To: Dave Cook From: Bob Ormsby Company: Titlo: Owners Rep. Phone: Phone: 12001730 -7201 Fax: 206 - 728 -2732 Fax: (206) 768 -7182 Message: URGENT - Bob 91Od Cant MarAInal Way South • Seattle, WashIr Ion • 98108-409/ rGiephona (206) 764 -5700 - FeJc:ImIIo (206) 7&1 5707 www.t r wstaui t luf fllJl i I,Quj ' FILE No .203 04/2b -01 14;11 I u ; I lurt,Hl ll'H l LIN Geo I ngitleers Museum of Flight. 040.4 East. Marginal Way South Sc.Ottll,, Washington PR I(IR Attention: Bob Ormsby rr1n'LVVr VVI .VL SIGNED A --PCEMENT April 19, 2001 consulting Engineers curl rensehinita. Fee Estimate Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Museum of' Flight 9404 r hst Marginal Way South Seattle, Washington File No. 80:9 - 001 -0I INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND This letter summarizes our planned scope or services and estimated fees to provide Phase 11 environmental site assessment (ESA) services at the above - mentioned site. The site currently is owned and occupied by Museum of Flight (MOF). We understand that MOP is planning to expand their facilities, and that soil north of the Museum and north of the Red Barn will be excavated as part of the planned expansion. Based on our review of available historical information for the site, a service station was located immediately north of the Purcell Avenue and East Marginal Way South intersection hatween at least 197.5 and the early I9R0s It. appears that there were multiple generations of service station buildings /Facilities and different owners throughout this period at this location. Purcell Avenue wa:) abandoned in the mid 1980s. The service station address was 0,122 East Marginal Way. The I'ullowirig, iiifol'Inot.ion coincides with information that we obtained from our interview with No Gregov on March 23. 2001. lie indicated that two underground storage Links (I Iti'I s) were removed .from the area immediately north of former Purcell Avenue during construction of the Great Gallery (the current location of the concrete benches between the Red Barn and Great Gallery), The:ae two UST:; were presumably associated with the former service station. Our research indicates that there were at least IO USTs associated with the service station(s) throughout the years. Therefore. it. is possible there are up to eight service station- related USTs that may remain at the site location. i- ILt NO.CJi lJ4/CO VI 14.11 11J•(wrc,ruIrH1VIV h9ncenm of Flight April 19, 2001 Page 2 I Mt'. • wv i Ws, SCOPE OF SERVICES The purpose of our proposed services is to (1) subcontraet a geophysical company to locate remaining UST's using magnetic and radar screening methods, (2) evaluate the vertical and lateral extent of possible petroleum- contaminated soil (originating from the historic service station) within the site propL rty boundary, and (3) characterize soil in the areas to be excavated as part of the planned MOP expansion. Our proposed scope of cervices for this project is as follows: 1. Coordinate and subcontract a utility check of the site using the one -call service and a subcontracted utility locating service. 2, Coordinate and subcontract a subsurface geophysical survey of the area between the Great Gallery and the Red Barn. The objective of the geophysical stn vey is to locate possible USTs from former service station operations: The geophysical survey is currently scheduled for April 20, 2001, 3. Prepare a site safety plan for use by Geolligincers field representatives. 4. Monitor the drilling of approximately 12 exploratory borings on -site using direct -push drilling equipment to depths between approximately I0 and 15 feet below ground Surface (hgs). Obtain soil samples at approximately 2- foot -depth intervals from the exploratory borings for field screening to check for evidence of petroleum hydrocarbons uc solvents, The borings will be baoktilled with bentonite at the completion of exploration. Exploratory drilling will be done by a licensed driller under subcontract with GenFingineers. 5. Submit one or two soil samples from each boring (up to 18 soil samples total) and one -time grab ground water samples fiuni three of the borings for chemical anttlyse3 of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene. xylenes (13ETX) using EPA Method 8021.A, gasr,linc -, diesel- and heavy oil - range - hydrocarbons using N'I WI'H -Ux, Additionally, the two soil samples with the highest field screening results will he analyzed for halogenated volatile organic compounds (I-IVOCs) using EPA Method 5260B and lead using EPA Method 6(17(1 lia e.d on the soil analytical results for IIVOC:s, up to two ground water samples may also be analyzed for 1-IVOCs. Laboratory testing will be done under subcontract. to OcoEngineers. h. Arrange tier Shannon & Wilson to collect and submit two soil samples obtained dining the installation of a geotechnical monitoring well Incited between the Great Gallery and the Red Barn. GeoPngineer, will collect one ground water sample from the Shannon rit. Wilson tuunituiing well the day of our drilling activities. The sample:: will be analyzed for RF_TX and gasoline -, diesel- and heavy nil- iwise-hydrocarbons. 7. Evaluate the field and laboratory data with regard to Model Tuxics Control Act (MTCA) cleanup regulations currently in affect. S. Attend two meetings with MOP. One meeting has already been completed (March IT 2001). 9. Provide a written report summarizing the results of the soil and ground water testing. This report will also include the results of our Phase! ESA historical research. r ' : , . , , r n e i n o . o r s Filo No. g(139-003-0 1.11 till FILE No.203 04/25 '01 14 ;12 Ill :rlUt -;HHNH11N Musenm Of Flight April 19, 2001 Page rHA . 3JU (Uo e loe rnuL. w OPTIONAL SCOPE ITEMS In the event that analytical dais from the soil samples collected during the above boring program indicate that petroleum - contaminated soil may extend oil -site beneath East Marginal Way South, we propose that additional soil borings be completed within the East Marginal Way South right -nf -way. We will discuss the results of the initial soil boring program with MOF and obtain their approval prior to proceeding with the additional borings. The purpose of the supplemental borings will be to (I) further delineate the lateral and vertical extent of contamination., (2) assist in identifying it' contaminated soil may be present in areas of planned excavation for museum expansion, and (3) evaluate if contamination may be related to petroleum contaminated soil and ground water observed in the southeast corner of the Boeing's '1128 property. This property is donated to MOF by Hoeing. Our proposed additional /optional scope of services (if necessary) is as follows: I. Obtain the necessary permits for drilling in the right of way of East Marginal Way South. 2. Cuor diu.rte and subcontract a utility locate prior to drilling and traffic control/safety measures (Ilaggers, signage, etc.) for the drilling activities, 3. Monitor the drilling of approximately four exploratory borings in the right of way of East Marginal Way South using direct -push drilling equipment to depths between approximately It) and 15 feet bgs. Obtain soil samples at approximately 7.-foot-depth intervals frorn the exploratory borings for field screening of potential petroleum hydrocarbons /solvents 4. Submit one or two soil samples from each boring (up to six soil samples) and ground water Samples from two of the borings for sire arrival inalrses of DETX, gasoline -, diesel- and heavy oil- range - hydrocarbons. We anticipate that buried utilities may he present near the planned boring locations. We will follow standard practices for notification and location of underground utilities; however. we request. that MOP provide us with drawings and plans, if available, .showing hurled utility loetr.tiona, or have facility personnel identify buried utility locations when plans are not available We will use uppropriute diligence when locating our borings to avoid utilities. However, we assume no liability if damage to utilities occurs from our explorations if utility locations are not shown on drawings or not located. Provided that die concentrations of VOCS in the ground water sample arc less than MTCA Method A cleanup levels, then GeoEngincers can transport off-site and discharge the well purge water and equipment decontamination water to the sanitary sewer in accordance with GeoEngineers' sewer discharge permit. If the water does not meet discharge criteria, we will contact you to discuss other options. SCHEDULE, TERMS AND BUDGET C)ur Phase II ESA services will be provided in accordance with the terns of our General Conditions, a copy of which is attached and is hart of this agreement. Please review the terms of this agreement carefully and contact us with any questions you may have, Note specifically that 11 le Nn 8IF(0_00a4 1 -i 1 50 FILE No .203 04/25 '01 14 ; 13 11J f1Ur GRnNR 16rd Museum of Flight April 19, 2001 Page 4 rho. CVO fC..)0 c rn1/4.71 our professional liability is limited to :0U.000 for this project, although higher limits can be negotiated. They tee for nor .cervices; including all subcontracted services, is estimated to -be $ 1 8,000. The fee for the additional /optional services (if necessary) is estimated to be $5,00(. We will bill our services on a time - told- expenso basis in accordance with our previously provided Schedule of Charges. We will keep you informed of the project status and advise you ae urdingly il' it appears that the scope of services and fee estimate require revision based on the results of our Studies. We can prnvirle you with an oral .. ilmmary and qualitative assessment of our findings the day the field work is completed; soil and ground water analytical results will be available from the laboratory within ten business days after submitting the samples. We can complete our data interpretation and report within about two wicks following receipt of the laboratory data. Therefore, our report should he available within about three weeks following completion of the field explorations and sampling, Please nntc'. that our tee estimate is based on conducting chemical analytical testing on a normal 5- to 10 -day turnaround for results. The analytical teatime turnaround time can ha modified to three day turnaround for 50 percent increase in laboratory costs, and to 24 hour turnaround for 100 percent increase in laboratory costa, A breakdown of our estimated fees is provided below. Field Services and Equipment Project Management and Data Evaluation Subcontracted Geophysical Survey Subcontracted Utility .Locating and Drilling St.ibcontractod Chemical Analytical Report Preparation TOTAL Optional /Additional Scope item's (tn he discussed with MOP' after initial soil boring results have been obtained) Permitting and Traffic Control Field Services and Equipment Project Management and Data Evaluation Subcontracted Utility 1.nritinE? and Drilling Subcontracted Chemical Analytical TOTAL rr o n h: n g i n o o r$ file No. 10139 00101.1 150 FILE No.203 0425 '01 14:1 "s lu;nurt,HI n-HtVN Museum of Flight April 19, 2001 Page 5 rH /\ •LVV i wi tv� We Zook forward to assisting you on this assignment. Please call if you have any questions regarding our scope or services or estimated t'i'.C. Confirmation of our authorization to proceed can be provided by returning one signed copy of this fee estimate. Yours very truly, (iroFnginccrs, inc. David A. Cook Senior Project Manager kct rt R. Fraese rincipal L P111DACd)I..C:pb P:\81803900:1101117inalstX01900301P-idoe Attachments Three copies Submitted The scope of services and terns described herein (not including the Ldditioual /optional scope items) art' arr..r;pteri and ( it.ohnginecrs, Inc. is authorized to proceed. (( (1 1 • - ------- •---- •— •-- (hanni7ntinn Oat': /2 --� ,71) / (Z r'(°-) r-'. ��l .. (-4) . i_,0_l�l.CJt1 e Nom. printed "hulnvidunl with :unlrucfinu authority and rempousihlc for nuvmenl of Cicol(nginucrN. Ine. YCr,9Ct'9. Cupyright':7.001 by Loc. All fishuY reuer"d. : 0 o If m i n e J r file No. R030 003-01-1150 FILE No .203 04/25 '01 14:13 I D : r1OFCAi1PA I GN FAX :2067687182 PR it 'r GENERAL CONDITIONS DEFINITIONS The words and phrases listed below have the following meanings when used in this Agreement: "Agreement" means the complete agreement between Client. and GeoEnginecrs, and consists of all of the Billowing: 1) The Proposal, including the Scope of Services contained within it; 2) These General Conditions and its alt lied SCI1CdttIC 01 Charges, as applicable; :t) Any documents expressly incorporated by reference into the Proposal or General Conditions; 4) Any modifications to this Agreement. if mutuntly (greet! to by tiro p :truce in writing. "( :pent" means the lndivtdual(s) or entity that has entered into this Agreement with GeuEigineets. "GeoEnginecrs" means GeoEnginecrs, Inc.. a Washington corporation, and any of its employes, officers and directors. GeoEnginecrs is soitioimrs refe..rrerl to as "us," "w& nr "oar" throughout this Agreement. "Scope of Services" means the sum total of all of our activities and all of tare lustrnmeuts 01 Service undertaken or provided pursuant. to this Agreement. • "Excluded Services" means those services that we are not providing under this Agreement. which includes any services recommended to Client and which Client chooses not to include in our Scope of Services. INTEGRATED EGRATED WRITTEN AGREEMENT This Agreement represents the entire and intcgnte;d agreement between Client and G. oEngineers and supersedes all prior communications, neentiatinnc, representations or agreements. either written or oral between the panics. No ngrecunenr or understanding varying or extending this Agrecint.au shall bind either panty, other than by a subsequent written agreement, signed by Client and GeoEnginecrs. STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTY DISCLAIMER GeoEnginecrs will endeavor to perform its professional services with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under sintilnr conditions by professional consultants practicing hi the same discipline at tare same time and location. No warranty or guarantee, either express or implied, is mode or intended by thin; Agreement or by anv report. opinion. or other Insirnmanl r,f Se'rvie. e provided pnrst ;tot to this Agreement, CLIENT FURNISHED INFORMATION AND OBLIGATIONS Client will provide GeoEnginecrs with the following: a description of the property; the locations of any underground utilities, facilities or suuetttes uii ai adjacent to the property which could impact our work; and the nature and location of any known or suspected hazardous materials that may exist on the property. Client will defend. indenutily and hold Cieol iigineers and our agents and subcontractors harmless from ;n y damage to undeigiutucl utilities, facilities or structures known by Client to exist and not. specifically or correctly identified to us. Ge:oEngincers is neither responsible nor liable for the creation. existence, nr presence of any hazardous materials. including asbestos. present at the work site prior to or during the performance of this Agreement. except any hazardous niatt:rinls generated solely by us, our agent.:; or subcontractors, PERMITS AND RIGHTS OF ENTRY if included in the Scope of Services. GeoEnginecrs will assist Client in obtaining necessary permits and licenses Client will provide for right. of entry and any authorizations needed for us 111 enter upon property 10 perform our services under this Agreement.. SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DISTURBANCE GeoFngiiiecis will take reasonable precautions to minimize surfacc and subsurface: disturbance. T-Towover. in the normal course of exploratory work some surface disturbance may near, the restoration of which is not part of tits Agreement unless specifically included in our Scope of Services, DISCOVERY OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES °1lnanticipated hazardous substances" arc any hazardous substances that may exist at the project site, but which this Agreement does not identify as pros ;nut and whose existence ie not re:,utirably anticipated. This. discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances will consttlnle a changed condition That will require renegotiation of the Scope of Services et termination of this Agreement. • The discovery or suspected discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances may necessitate that we take immediate Mcasures 10 protect the public health. ll'we discover unanttcipatcd hazardous substances, we will neat ( ;euliueindar� I of 5 I'!:uinuntumtntetsAienentl Condtuots•■01,a0c FILE No .203 04/25 '01 14;14 11) : f1U UHRHP 16N rHA•CVOroorloc rmuL o Client as soon as practicable. and will take any and all treasures that, In our professional opinion, are justified to preserve and to protect the public health and safety of our personnel, Client will pry the cost of any such additional protective nle'slsurrs. Client is responsible for reporting releases of hazardous substances to apprupiiale guvetnmutt agencies as required by law. Client waives any claim against (leoEnginccrs and will Indemnify and hold us harmless from any claim. injury or loss arising from the discovery of unanticipated hazardous substances. UNANTICIPATED AND CHANGED CONDITIONS Actual subsurface conditions nt other Locations may vary from those encountered at the rpccific locations where (ienF.nginc.rr.s rnnrinrt.c its surveys nr explorations. We can only base our site data. interpretations and recommendations on information reasonably available to us. Practical and tCiuslntable limitations on available data will result in some level of uncertainty, rind therefore rir:k, with respect to the interpretation of environmentai, geological and gcolcchnical conditions even when we have followed the standard of care. The discovery of 0uantieilsaled of changed conditions may require renegotiation of the Scope of Services or termination of services. GcoEngineers reserves; the right to solely determine the. cnntinnerl : Ii'gnacy of this Agreement in light of any discovcty of conditions That were not. reasonably anticipated or known at the time of this Agreement., If we determine drat renegotiation is necessary, GeoEnginccrs rind Client will in good faith enter into rcnce,ntiatinn of this Agreement to permit its to continue to meet Client's needs. If Client. and (ieoEngineers cannot agree on new terms, we reserve the right to terminate this Agreement. and receive payment from Client for Jill services performed and expanses incurred up to and including the date of termination. SITE SAFETY (;eol=ngineers will maintain a safety program for uur employees. (iooF.nginr..r.rs ,sper.ifirally disclaims any authority or responsibility for general job site safety and for the safety of persons who are not employed by us. (icoEngincers is not responsible for the job safety or site safety of the general project and is not responsible for Coulpliance with safety programs and related f1Sl -lA and stale regulations that apply to site contractors or their employees. subcontractors. and agents. Client is independently tcsponsiblc for requiring thaat its construction or remcdintion contractors take responsibility for general job sire safety. CONSTRUCTION AND REMEDIATION OBSERVATION The conclusions and recommendations for constn ction or rcmndiatinn in our reports are based on limited sampling and the interpretations of variable subsurface conditions, Therefore, um cultelusions and recommendations shall be dented preliminary unless or unlit we Jiro requested by Client to validate our assumptions and finalize our conclusions and recommendations by pre•consinlcl.ion design doculnettts review and site presence during construction or reinedtation and have completed such wurk. If um Sculsc of services dots not include pre- construction plan review and constriction /rernedintiml observation, then any reliance by Client or any other party on our preliminary assumptions, conclusions or reconunendatioliS is at the risk of that party and without liability to GcoEnglncers. Off job site activities do not change any agree Itcnl between Client and any other party. Only Client ha.c thy. right In reject or stop work of its contractors or agents. Our presence on site does not in any way guarantee the completion. quality or performance of the wok by any other party retained by Client to provide field or conslruCuon/remediation services, We are not responsible tor, and do not have control nr charge nf. the specific means, methods, techniques. sequences or procedures of consln ction or remedlatlon selected by any CuuuuClur ut agent of Client. SAMPLE RETENTION AND DISPOSAL We will discard nonhazardous samples 60 days idler they Jiro obtained, unless Client makes prior :arrangements to store or deliver the samples. Samples containing hazardous materials regulated under federal, state or local environmental laws are the property and responsibility of Client. Client will arrange for lawful disposal, trenunent and transportation of contaminated samples at Client's expense, unless Client snakes oIhcr written agreements regarding their disposal. INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE Reports, field data. laboratory data, analyses. calculations. estimates. designs and other documents prepared by GcoEngiuccrs arc insuvments of Service and remain our property. We will retain pertinent. record; relating to the 0: 0 E n g s n c e r s 2 of 5 I': adtaln!tontratrx'•t.tcnanl Conditiona•2OO1 r FILE No.203 04/25 '01 14;15 ID ;r1OFCAi1PAIGN FAX ;2067687182 Fait 9 services performed for 10 years following submission of any report produced wider this Agreement, and will make extra copies of the Instruments of Service available to Client on request for a reasonable lee. Neither Client nor any other pony may use the Instnuncnts of Service ibr additions or alterations to this prujeet, or fur other projects, ur otherwise outside the scup' of this Agreement, without our prior written permission. Client will defend, indemnify and hold GeoEngineers harmless from any claims, damages and expenses arising out or any such reuse unless expressly authorized by GeoEngineers in writing prior to such reuse. Documents that may he relied upon by Client are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) that :re.. signed or sealed by its. Files in elc trnnirt media Iitnnat of text, data. graphics or of other types that are furnished by GeoEngineers to Client are only for Mc convenience of GcuEngineers and Client, Any cunclu,ion ur information obtained or derived from such electronic files will he at the user's sole risk. Data stored in electronic media format can deteriorate or be modified inadvertently or otherwise. GeuF.uginecis shall not be tep,tnlsible to maintain documents stored in cicctronic media, When transferring documents in electronic media format, we make no representations as to long -term compatibility. usability. or readability ofdocttinenls resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems. or computer hardware differing from those used by us. We shall not be responsible for any alterations. modifications or additions made in the electronic data by the Client or any reuse of the electronic data by the Client or any other party for this project ur any idler project without our consent. Client shall defend. indemnify and hold un harmless against any claims. damages or log..ws :irking out of the reuse of the electronic data without our written consent anct arising out of alterations. nuadilicaliurus, or nddiliutts to Lilo elcctrunit: dal:t IiGtde by anyone other than Ocoingiuecra. All docuntcnts, including the electronic files that are transferred by us to Client are Instruments of Service. nr UeoEngincers and created for this project. only. and no representation or warranty is made, either express or implied, concerning the files and data. BILLING AND PAYMENT We will bill for our services monthly. Payment is due on receipt of the invoice Indus otherwise agreed to in writing. A service cllargn of I -1 /2 "A per ntniuh applies In any unpaid amounts that are more than (1 calendar days past due. ill addition w any past duo amount. Client will pay all of our reasonable expenses necessary for collection of tiny part dire amounts including, but not limited t.), nuoxneys' Ices and cxrt•.ners, fling fees, lien costs and our stall'time. Without incurring any liability to Client, we may either suspend or terminate this Agreement if Client fails to pay any undisputed invoice amounts within fifh calendar clays of the invoice date, or if Client states its intention nut to pay forthcoming invoices. Such suspension or termination will nut waive any other claim against Client. Following such suspension or termination, we may resume work by mutual agreement after payment by Client of all outstanding invoiced amounts and collection expenses ADJUSTMENT FOR INCREASED COSTS GeoFnginner.c reserves the right to invoice Client for additional charges incurred in the event of an unanticipated Increase in prujeLt- related lases. fees or similar levies: or if CcoEngincers utu.yt modify project- related services. facilities or equipment to comply with new laws or regulations or changes to existing Laws or regulations that become effective alter execution of this Agreement. GeuEngiueers revises its Schedule of Charges annually. Therefore. we reserve the right to modify our Schedule of Charges applicable to our cervices if performance of this Agreement extends beyond 12 months. or if changes in the project. schedule result in our services extending lino the next calendar year. We will notify Client in advance of any increases. SCOPE OF SERVICES AND EXCLUDED SERVICES Our engagement Laufer this Agreement includes only those services specified in the Scope of Services. Client agrees it will not held its liable for not perforating :additional services that. Client has instructed us not to perform. and Client expressly waives any claim against OetiEugiucers resulting from our failure to perform recommended additional services that Client has not authorized us to perform. TERMINATION OF SERVICES Termination for Caine Either party may terminate this Agreement upon at least seven (7) days written notice. in Ilse event of substantial failure by the other party 10 perform in accordance with this Agreement through no fault of the ( 1 o F. 1 1 a i n c e r ,c 3 of 3 Cnuditi.su 200t,.1... FILE No .203 04/25 '01 14:16 I D : i1OFCAr1PA I GN h-W iejt) rtia r icsc f'HUC lu terminating party, Such termination is not effective if the failure is curcd before expiration of the period specified in the written nation. Upon termination for cause by either party, all invoices for services performed up to the date of Iertrlination are immediately due and payable. 'J'errnlnntlnn for Convenience tither party may terminate this Agreement for convenience upon 14 days written notice to the other. in the event that Client requests Carly tertllin;ai.itnl of our services fur convenience, we reserve the right to complete such analyses and records as arc necessary to place our files in order and lo complete a report on the services performed to date. Charges for these termmination activities are in addition to all charges Incurred up to the date of lermintltion. INDEMNIFICATION GeoEngineers will indemnify and hold the Client harmless from and against any claims, liabilities, damages and costs (including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense) arising out of death or bodily injury to persons ur damage to property to the extent caused by ur resulting from the sine negligence of OvvEngiueets. its agcuu ur its employees.. For any such claims, liabilities, damages or costs caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of Ge Engineers and the Client, any duly In indemnify shall extend only 10 the extent of GcoFngincers' negligence. The Client will indemnify and hold Geo1 ngineers harmless from and against any rlaims, liahilitiac, damages and costs (Including reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense) arising out of dear' or bodily injury to persons Or damage to property to Clio extent caused by or resulting; front rho solo negligence of the Client, its :agents or its employees. For any such claims, liabilities. damages or costs caused by or resulting troth the concurrent negligence of CicoEilgitteels and the Client, any day to indemnify shall extend only to the e'tenl of tlhc Client's negligence. For claims of economic loss or fur claims unrelated to bodily ifluly to persons or Vantage to property, which :uiSC out of the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Client. Client's agents or employees, Client's contractors, or any other consultant retained by the Client. the Client will indemnify and hold Cienl ?njrinners harmless from and against anv such claims, liabilities, damages and costs (including reasonable atturncy fees and costs of defense), LIMITATION OF REMEDIES GcuEtigineurs' aggregate liability tespuasibility to Client, including that of our officers, directors, employees and agents:, is: limited to 5;50,000 or the amount of GcoFngincers' lee under this Agreement, whichever is greater. This limitation al remedy applies Io all lawsuits, claims or actions, based on allegations of professional errors or omissions, whether identified as arising in tort, contract. or other legal theory. when Mc. alleged errors or omissions arise out. of or related to our services under this Agreement and any continnntirm nr extension of our services. CieoEngincers may agree. at Client's request, to Increase the limitation of remedy amount for professional liability claims to a greater 5001 in exchange fora negotiated increase in our fee. Any additional charge for a •higher limit is consideration for the greater risk assumed by ns and is not a charge for additional prolessional liability insurance. Any agreement to increase the limitation of remedy amount maul be made in writing; and signed by both parties in advance of the provision of services under this Agreement. In the wont of bodily injury nr property damage claims not related to professional errors or omissions. CieoEngineers shall not be responsible fur any less, damage or liability beyond the amounts, limits or conditions of the applicable insurance covorago on I.Itc dale the claim is trade. By entering into this Agreement. Client acknowledges that this Limitation of Remedies Clause has been reviewed. tutdersluud and is a nutlet MI pact of this Agreement, and that Client has had an opportunity to seek legal novice regarding this provision. INSURANCE GcoFngincers maintains Workers' Compensation and Fmployer'.c Liability insurance as required by state law, We also maintain comprehensive general, auto, professional and environmental impairment liability insurance. and wc will provide copies of certificates evidencing these policies which are available for review on request, MUTUAL WAIVER OF CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES In no event will either party be liable to the other for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages of any nature arising out of or related to the performance of this Agreement.. whether founded in negligence. strict liability, warranty or bleach of euntt;tct. Q •t tl 11 t: i u u u 1 4of1 P.Witi uicuuttutln'Gcttctnl Cvutition,.21N11.,luc FILE No.203 0425 '01 14;16 ID ;f1UhCRf1PA1UN r-Hf . tamer 1Oc rMUC 11 DISPUTES The parties to this Agreement must refer any dispute. rnntrovcrsy nr claim arising out of or relating In this Agreement or its breach to mediation before pursuing any other dispute remedy, Any dispute. claim or controversy nut resolved in mediation will bo decided in binding arbitration in accordance with 1.11e Construction Industry Rules of the American Arbitration Association at its offices closest to the project site, unless the panties mutually agree t� seine other dispute resolution forum. This Agreement is governed by and subject to interpretation pursuant to the laws of the Site of Washington. 1•he prevailing party in any arbitration or litigation will be entitled to recover reasonable titturueys' fees. legal costs, arbitration fccs and other claim- related expenses, including reasonable fees for the Limo of its personnel. CLAIMS ASSISTANCE FOR CLIENT If n construction contractor or other party files a claim against Client, relating to services perforated by CieoFngineers and C.lient requires additional information or assistance to evaluate or defend against such claims, we will make our personnel ttvttiluble fun consultation with Client's staff and for testimony, if necessary. We will make ranch essential personnel available upon reasonable notice frown Client and Client will reimhmse Geoingineers for such consultation or testimony. including travel costs. at the rates than apply for ether services under this Agreement. We will provide services in connection with any such claims pursuant to a written supplement, if necessary. extending this Agreement. TIME BAR TO LEGAL ACTION The parties agree that all legal actions by either party against the other concerning our services pursuant to this Agreement or for failure to pet rut in in accordance with the applicable standard of care, however denominated, will become barred two (2) years from the completion of (icut:ngineers' scrvic'c,c. NO THIRD PARTY RIGHTS Nothing in this Agreement or as a consequence ol'any of the services provided gives any rights or beuehts to anyone other than Client. and GeoEngineers, All duties and responsibilities undertaken pursuant to this Agreement are for tltc sole and exclusive benefit of Client and GeeEngineers and not for the benefit of any other party Client. agw's that it will not provide any data. reports or other information to any third parry without the prior written consent of Cu0Enginoels. And in the absence of such consent, GeoEngineer; will have no liability to C hunt. or 10 :air; third party for claims resulting from such disclosure. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT OR CLAIMS Neither the Client nor GeoEnginccrs may delegate, assign, sublet, or transfer the duties. interests or responsibilttres Set. forth in this Agreement. or any cause of action or chitin relating to the services provided under this Agreement, to other entities without the written consent. of rho other party. SURVIVAL These tutus and condit.iony survive the completion of the services under this Agreement :n d the termination of this Agreement, whether for cause or Mr convenience. SEVERABILITY if any provision of this Agrecmdtt is ever held to be unenforceable, all remaining provisions will eutitiiuc in 11111 liaree and effect. Client and OenEngineers agree that l.hcy will attempt in good faith to replace any unenforceable provision with one that is valid and enforceable- and which conforms as closely as possible with the original intent of any unenforceable provision. Qd,)1'.IlgI 11 cerN 5 of 5 I':'adnun colatraa�,Gcn.rnl Condaium.:00 i d„r 1 .. - File No. 8039.003-01 -1130 ' The EDR Radius Map with GeoCheck® Museum of Flight/GeoEngineers 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 Inquiry Number: 607170.1s March 15, 2001 ErST Environmental Data Resources, Inc. The Source For Environmental Risk Management Data 3530 Post Road Southport, Connecticut 06490 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1- 800 - 352 -0050 Fax: 1- 800 - 231 -6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1. Overview Map. 2 Detail Map. 3 Map Findings Summary. 4 Map Findings. 5 . Orphan Summary. 59 EPA Waste Codes_ EPA -1 Government Records Searched /Data Currency Tracking. GR -1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A -1 Physical Setting Source Summary . A -2 Physical Setting Source Map. A -7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings. A -8 Physical Setting Source Records Searched. A -12 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1- 800 - 352 -0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. Entire contents copyright 2001 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and the edr logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC607170.1s Page 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the govemment records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527 -00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 9404 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98108 COORDINATES Latitude (North): 47.520600 - 4T 31' 14.2" Longitude (West): 122.297800 - 122' 17' 52.1" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 10 UTM X (Meters): 552865.9 UTM Y (Meters): 5263039.5 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: 2447122 -E3 SEATTLE SOUTH, WA Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527 -00 search radius around the target property for the following databases: FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites CERCLIS . Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information . System RCRIS -TSD Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD SWF /LF Solid Waste Facility Database FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions FINDS . Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System MINES Mines Master Index File NPL Liens. Federal Superfund Liens PADS PCB Activity Database System RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA. Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & . Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL EMI Washington Emissions Data System EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Coal Gas Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified. Elevations have been determined from the USGS 1 degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. EDR's definition of a site with an elevation equal to the target property includes a tolerance of +/- 10 feet. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property (by more than 10 feet). Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold Italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD CERCLIS - NFRAP: As of February 1995. CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund Action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. A review of the CERC -NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/16/2000 has revealed that there are 2 CERC -NFRAP sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address BOEING /WI DEVELOPMENTAL CENTE 9725 E MARGINAL WAY S KENWORTH TRUCK CO 8801 E MARGINAL WY S Dist / Dir Map ID Page 0 - 1/8 SSW A4 9 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C9 20 TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally- defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/20/2000 has revealed that there are 2 CORRACTS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page BOEING A &M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTE 9725 E MARGINAL WAYS 0 - 1/8 SSW A4 9 Lower Elevation Address Dist/ Dir Map ID Page RHODIA INC 9229 E MARGINAL WY S RH 1/2 - 1 NNW 15 34 RCRIS: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database includes selected information on sites that generate, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Act. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the RCRIS -LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/21 /2000 has revealed that there are 2 RCRIS -LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir __ Map ID Page BOEING A &M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTE 9725E MARGINAL WAYS 0 - 1/8 SSW A4 9 KENWORTH TRUCK CO 8801 E MARGINAL WY S 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C9 20 RCRIS: The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act database includes selected information on sites that generate, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Act. The source of this database is the U.S. EPA. A review of the RCRIS -SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/21/2000 has revealed that there are 3 RCRIS -SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page BOEING KING CNTY AIRPORT OFFIC 9010 E MARGINAL WAY S 0 - 1/8 NW 1 5 BOEING DRUM 9725 E MARGINAL WAY GAT 0 - 1/8 SSW A2 5 RL ALIA CO 9215 M L KING JR WAYS 1/8 - 1 /4ENE B7 14 STATE ASTM STANDARD CSCSL: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Ecology's Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites List. A review of the CSCSL list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 15 CSCSL sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page BOEING A &M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTE 9725 E MARGINAL WAY S 0 - 1/8 SSW A3 6 KENWORTH TRUCK CO. 8801 E MARGINAL WAY S 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C8 15 TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1 Equal /Higher Elevation S 96TH ST DITCH KHY & LI PROPERTY NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING KRS MARINE MOIMOI PROPERTY HYSTER SALES CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 Lower Elevation BOEING ISAACSON THOMPSON JORGENSEN FORGE CORP RHOD/A INC BOEING ISAACSON PROPERTY MALARKEY ASPHALT CO PRECISION ENGINEERING Address S 96TH ST / DUWAMISH 9056 37TH AVE S 10230 E MARGINAL WY S 1621 S 92ND PLACE 10118 DES MOINES MEMORI 9892 40TH AV S 10805E MARGINAL WY Dist / Dir Map ID Page 1/4 - 1 /2WSW 14 31 1/2 -1 ENE 16 39 1/2 - 1 SSE 18 41 1/2 -1 W 19 45 1/2 -1 SW 21 49 1/2 -1 SE 22 50 1/2 -1 SSE 24 54 Address Dist / Dir Map ID Page 8541E MARGINAL WAYS 1/4 -1 /2NNW D11 23 8531E MARGINAL WAYS 1/4 - 1 /2NNW D12 24 9229 E MARGINAL WY S RH 1/2 -1 NNW 15 34 8625 E MARGINAL WAY 1/2 -1 NNW 17 40 8700 DALLAS AV S 1/2 -1 NW 20 45 1231 S DIRECTOR ST 1/2 - 1 W 23 53 LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Ecology's Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/06/2000 has revealed that there are 3 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation KENWORTH TRUCK CO. Lower Elevation THOMPSON SITE EARLE M JORGENSEN COMPANY Address 8801 E MARGINAL WAY S Address Dist / Dir Map ID 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C8 Dist / Dir Map ID Page 15 Page 8701 E MARGINAL WAY 1/4 - 1 /2NNW 10 22 8531E MARGINAL WAY SOU 1/4 -1 /2NNW D13 30 UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Ecology's Statewide UST Site/Tank Report. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/06/2000 has revealed that there are 3 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation O.R. ALIA, INC. KENWORTH TRUCK CO. KENWORTH TRUCK CO Address 9215 M.L. KING WAY S. 8801 E MARGINAL WAY S 8801E MARGINAL WY S Dist I Dir Map ID Page 1/8 - 1/4 ENE B6 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C8 1/8 - 1/4NNW C9 14 15 20 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL ICR: These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the site. These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree. A review of the WA ICR list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 WA ICR sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Equal /Higher Elevation BOEING DRUM KING COUNTY AIRPORT - HANGAR KENWORTH TRUCK CO. Lower Elevation JORGENSEN FORGE CORP Address 9725 E MARGINAL WAY GAT 9220 E. MARGINAL WAY S. 8801 E MARGINAL WAY S Address 8531 E MARGINAL WAY S Dist /Dir Map ID 0 - 1/8 SSW A2 0- 1/8 NNW 5 1/8 - 1 /4NNW C8 Dist / Dir Map ID 1/4 - 1 /2NNW D12 Page 5 14 15 Page 24 TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name RICCHIAZZI INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY STIPE CROW PESCHEL RESIDENCE LAIDLAW UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR SEATTLE CITY LIGHT STEAMPLANT GEOR JIMS MARKET & GAS SEATTLE, CY OF, 1ST AV BRG LDFL HELMER'S AUTO PARTS EVERGREEN MARINE LEASING (THREE RE SR 99 & FIRST AVE. BRIDGE SPILLNVS UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD NORTHWEST ENVIRO SERVICE MOBIL CANAL BULK PLANT FEDERAL AVIATION ADM CITY OF SEATTLE /UNION PACIFIC RR R RASMUSSEN EQUIPMENT BAXTER RUTHERFORD UNOCAL #3707 UNOCAL #3707 (TWO REPORTS) BOEING - NORTH FIELD - FIRE TRAIN! BOEING - NORTH BOEING FIELD ARCO #5246 TEXACO #004502 SOUTHLAND #27390 SHOUTHLAND #27390 EXXON #7 9049 EXXON #7 9049 (TWO REPORTS) Database(s) CSCSL CSCSL RCRIS -SQG, FINDS, UST, WA ICR, CSCSL CSCSL CSCSL CSCSL CSCSL CSCSL CERC -NFRAP UST, WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR WA ICR TC607170.1s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 OVERVIEW MAP - 607170.1s - Geo Engineers, Inc. * Target Property A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites 1/4 12 1 lake Power transmission lines N OiI & Gas pipelines 100 -year flood zone 500 -year flood zone ® Wetlands ffa TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: CITY /STATE /ZIP: LAT /LONG: Museum of FllghUGeoEngineers 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle WA 98108 47.5206 / 122.2978 CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY #: DATE: Geo Engineers, Inc. Dave Cook 607170.1s March 15, 2001 1:13 pm DETAIL MAP - 607170.1s - Geo Engineers, Inc. • • 1 E—:; Target Property Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property Coal Gasification Sites (if requested) Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites 114 Mlles J�J Power transmission lines N OiI & Gas pipelines Mj 100 -year flood zone FA 500 -year flood zone Wetlands OKA TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS: CITY /STATE/ZIP: LAT /LONG: Museum of FGght/GeoEngineers 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle WA 98108 47.5206 / 122.2978 CUSTOMER: CONTACT: INQUIRY //: DATE: Geo Engineers, Inc. Dave Cook 607170.1s March 15, 2001 1:13 pm Database FEDERAL. ASTM STANDARD MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY.'' Search Target Distance Property (Miles) Total < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CERC -NFRAP 0.250 1 1 NR NR NR 2 CORRACTS 1.000 1 0 0 1 NR 2 RCRIS -TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 1 1 NR NR NR 2 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 2 1 NR NR NR 3 ERNS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE ASTM STANDARD CSCSL 1.000 1 1 3 10 NR 15 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUST 0.500 0 1 2 NR NR 3 UST 0.250 0 3 NR NR NR 3 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT ROD Delisted NPL FINDS HMIRS MLTS MINES NPL Liens PADS RAATS TRIS TSCA FTTS STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 WA ICR 0.500 2 1 1 NR NR 4 WA Emissions TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Coal Gas 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 AQUIFLOW - see EDR Physical Setting Source Addendum TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC607170.1s Page 4 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 1 NW < 1/8 113 Higher A2 SSW < 1/8 427 Higher .MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Coal Gas Site Search: No site was found In a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database. BOEING KING CNTY AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER 9010 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE, WA 98108 RCRIS: Owner. BOEING KING CNTY AIRPORT OFFICE CENTER Contact: LOUIS BABICH 111 (425) 234-1766 Record Date: 12/31/1996 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found RCRIS -SQG 1000257111 FINDS WAD980985212 BOEING DRUM 9725 E MARGINAL WAY GATE J28 SEATTLE, WA 98108 Site 1 of 3 in cluster A RCRIS: Owner. WA ECY (360) 555 -1212 Contact: BRIDGETT HOOVER (360) 867 -7213 Record Date: 11/08/1993 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: 04/09/91 Halogenated organic compounds Metals Polynudear aromatic hydrocarbons Groundwater, Soil Not reported North Westem Not reported 91 -27 17 Not reported Not reported 01/09/91 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem RCRIS -SQG 1000474107 FINDS WAD988482022 WA ICR TC607170.1s Page 5 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site A3 SSW <1/8 427 Higher MAP FINDINGS' BOEING DRUM (Continued) Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Interim cleanup report 91 -20 17 Not reported Not reported 05/10/93 Halogenated Solvents Non - haologenated solvents Groundwater, Soil Not reported North Westem Interim cleanup report 93 -02 17 Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000474107 BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER CSCSL S102363846 9725 E MARGINAL WAY S NIA TUKWILA, WA 98108 Site 2 of 3 In cluster A SHWS: Facility ID: 2101 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 56 Longitude: 122 17 51 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 6 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS.-. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING A8M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) S102363846 Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2101 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 56 Longitude: 122 17 51 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Surface Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2101 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 56 Longitude: 122 17 51 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Air Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base / Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present TC607170.1s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FNDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING A &M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) S102363846 Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2101 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 56 Longitude: 122 17 51 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2101 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE TC607170.1s Page 8 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site A4 SSW < 1/8 427 Higher • MAR FINDINGS >: EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 56 Longitude: 122 17 51 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Sediments Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER 9725 E MARGINAL WAY S TUKWILA, WA 98108 Site 3of3ln cluster A CERCLIS -NFRAP Classification Data: Site Incident Category: Not reported Ownership Status: Other CERCLIS -NFRAP Assessment History: Assessment: DISCOVERY Assessment: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Assessment: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT CERCLIS -NFRAP Alias Name(s): BOEING CO DEF & SPACE MIL AIRPLANES DIV Federal Facility: NPL Status: Completed: Completed: Completed: FINDS RCRIS -LOG CORRACTS CERC -NFRAP S102363846 1000922442 WAD093639946 Not a Federal Facility Not on the NPL 19801118 19850430 19880527 CORRACTS Data: Prioritization: High Status: RCRA Facility Assessment Completed, Determination of Need for a RCRA Facility Investigation, RFI Imposition, Stabilization Measures Evaluation, Stabilization Measures Implemented TC607170.1s Page 9 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS BOEING ASM DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) RCRIS Corrective Action Summary: Effective Date: 09/21/1994 Legal Authority: Other, specified by Legal Authority Citation RCRIS: Owner. BOEING CO (206) 655 -2502 Contact: JAMES JOHNSTONE (206) 544-1230 Record Date: 12/31/1998 Classification: Large Quantity Generator BIENNIAL REPORTS: Last Biennial Reporting Year. 1997 Ault/ D001 D003 D005 D007 D009 D011 D035 F001 F003 0001 U069 U121 _chantLLiLU) 26037.97 72.00 46526.85 49681.93 2192.84 24488.69 3320.00 58027152.00 8283.00 10.00 10.00 15.00 Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: Violations exist Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: YLaale 4szanti1y D002 3775.00 O 004 11277.00 D006 34759.69 O 008 49587.69 D010 22155.85 D018 3926.17 D040 33.00 F002 8286.00 F005 16261.62 U003 20.00 U112 45.93 U170 1.00 Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 03/24/1988 Low 09/24/1988 08/08/1989 Written Informal 08/24/1988 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD - Closure /Post Closure Requirements 03/24/1988 Low 09/24/1988 08/08/1989 Written Informal 08/24/1988 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 03/24/1988 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000922442 TC607170.1s Page 10 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Low 09/24/1988 08/08/1989 Written Informal 08/24/1988 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Land Ban Requirements 03 /24/1988 Low 09/24/1988 08/08/1989 Written Informal 08 /24/1988 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 08/14/1991 Low 11 /29/1991 11 /27/1991 Written Informal 10 /29/1991 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 08 /23/1989 Low 03/11/1990 03/08/1990 Written Informal 03/01/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 08 /23/1989 Low 03/11/1990 03/08/1990 Written Informal 03/01/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -Land Ban Requirements 08 /23/1989 Low 03/11/1990 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000922442 TC607170.1s Page 11 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAR FINDINGS BOEING ABM DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: 03/08/1990 Written Informal 03/01/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Land Ban Requirements 08/23/1989 Low 03/11/1990 03/08/1990 Written Informal 03/01/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 07 /28/1993 Low 03/04/1994 03/02/1994 Written Informal 01/18/1994 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 03/09/1995 Low 04/30/1995 04/30/1995 Written Informal 04/12/1995 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 03/09/1995 Low 04/30/1995 04/30/1995 Written Informal 04/12/1995 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 03/09/1995 Low 04/30/1995 04/30/1995 Written Informal EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000922442 TC607170.1s Page 12 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: 04/12/1995 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator-All Requirements 12/11/1996 Low 02/28/1997 12/11/1996 Written Informal 01/15/1997 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator-All Requirements 12/11/1996 Low 02/28/1997 12/11/1996 Written Informal 01/15/1997 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD- Financial Responsibility Requirements 03/08/1985 Low 04/08/1985 05/10/1985 Written Informal 03/08/1985 Not reported Not reported There are 16 violation record(s) reported at this site: EY�Lq flQtL- Other Evaluation Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number A[esungQlatio Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements Generator -All Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements Generator -Land Ban Requirements TSD -Land Ban Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD- Closure /Post Closure Requirements 1000922442 Date of Lomoliance 12/11/1996 12/11/1996 04/30/1995 04/30/1995 04/30/1995 03/02/1994 11/27/1991 03/08/1990 03/08/1990 03/08/1990 03/08/1990 08/08/1989 08/08/1989 TC607170.1s Page 13 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 5 NNW < 118 651 Higher B6 ENE 1/8 -1/4 1221 Higher B7 ENE 1/8 -1/4 1237 Higher MAP Pt3NDINGS BOEING A&M DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER (Continued) Financial Record Review (FRR) FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: Permit Compliance System (PCS) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Land Ban Requirements TSD - Financial Responsibility Requirements KING COUNTY AIRPORT - HANGAR 9220 E. MARGINAL WAY S. SEATTLE, WA 98108 WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: 12/15/92 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Final cleanup report 92-44 17 Not reported Not reported O.R. ALIA, INC. 9215 M.L. KING WAY S. SEATTLE, WA 98118 Site 1 of 2 in cluster B UST: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 2705 12/31/64 111 to 1,100 Gallons Removed 2 Not reported Not reported 1 North Western 2705 12/31/64 111 to 1,100 Gallons Removed 1 Not reported UNLEADED GASOLINE 1 North Western 1000922442 08/08/1989 08/08/1989 05/10/1985 WA ICR S104486992 N/A RL ALIA CO 9215 M L KING JR WAY S SEATTLE, WA 98118 Site 2 of 2 in cluster B UST U000587823 N/A RCRIS -SQG 1000659748 FINDS WAD988494241 TC607170.1s Page 14 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RL ALIA CO (Continued) 1000659748 RCRIS: Owner. RL ALIA CO (360) 555-1212 Contact: RICHARD ALIA (206) 722 -4900 Record Date: 06/17/1993 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found C8 KENWORTH TRUCK CO. UST U003028407 NNW 8801 E MARGINAL WAY S LUST NIA 118 -114 SEATTLE, WA 98108 WA ICR 1282 CSCSL Same Site 1 of 2 in cluster C SHWS: Facility ID: 2072 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 38 Longitude: 122 18 18 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2072 Facility Status: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 15 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number KENWORTH TRUCK CO. (Continued) U003028407 Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 38 Longitude: 122 18 18 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Surface Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2072 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 38 Longitude: 122 18 18 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported TC607170.1s Page 16 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number KENWORTH TRUCK CO. (Continued) U003028407 Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Facility ID: 2072 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 38 Longitude: 122 18 18 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Sediments Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: LUST: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: 423613 423639 AWAITING CLEANUP Not reported SURFACE WATER Not reported Suspected to be present 4 Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Suspected to be present Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: North Western 05/13/1997 05/13/1997 TC607170.1s Page 17 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS • KENWORTH TRUCK CO. (Continued) Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: 423613 423639 AWAITING CLEANUP Not reported SOIL 423613 423639' AWAITING CLEANUP Not reported GROUND WATER WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Ecology Region: North Western Release Date: 05/13/1997 Status Date: 05/13/1997 Ecology Region: North Western Release Date: 05/13/1997 Status Date: 05/13/1997 08/08/99 Petroleum products Groundwater, Surface water, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -17 17 Not reported Not reported 09/29/90 Halogenated organic compounds Petroleum products Phenolic compounds Non - haologenated solvents Groundwater. Soil Spill, Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 90 -14 17 Not reported Not reported 09/25/95 Metals Petroleum products Soil Unknown North Westem Interim cleanup report 94 -08 17 Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U003028407 TC607170.1s Page 18 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS KENWORTH TRUCK CO. (Continued) UST: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 8218 12/31/64 Not reported CLOSURE IN PROCESS 2 Steel-Unprotected Not reported 1 North Westem 8218 12/31/64 Not reported Removed 7 Steel- Unprotected HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE 1 North Western 8218 12/31/64 Not reported Removed 8 Steel- Unprotected HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE 1 North Western 8218 1/1/79 10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Operational 5 Steel- Unprotected Not reported 1 North Western 8218 1/1/79 10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Operational 6 Steel- Unprotected Not reported 1 North Western EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number U003028407 TC607170.1s Page 19 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site C9 NNW 1/8 -114 1282 Same MAP FINDINGS KENWORTH TRUCK CO. (Continued) Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 8218 8/4/78 10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Operational 4 Coated Steel MOTOR OIL 1 North Western 8218 8/4/78 10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS Operational 1 Coated Steel ANTIFREEZE 1 North Western 8218 8/4/78 10,000 TO 19,999 GALLONS CLOSURE IN PROCESS 3 Coated Steel DIESEL 1 North Western EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number KENWORTH TRUCK CO 8801 E MARGINAL WY S SEATTLE, WA 98108 Site 2 of 2 In cluster C CERCLIS -NFRAP Classification Data: Site Incident Category: Not reported Ownership Status: Other CERCLIS -NFRAP Assessment History: Assessment: Assessment: Assessment: RCRIS: Owner. Contact: DISCOVERY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION PACCAR INC (425) 468 -7400 LISA MONTOYA (206) 767-8647 Record Date: 12/31/1999 Classification: Large Quantity Generator BIENNIAL REPORTS: Last Biennial Reporting Year. 1997 Amt$ QuantitlL(Ltvs) D001 18968.00 Federal Facility: NPL Status: Completed: Completed: Completed: St2/ tg Quantity (Lbs) D006 644451.00 U003028407 FINDS 1000438637 RCRIS-LOG WAD009249509 TRIS CERC -NFRAP UST Not a Federal Facility Not on the NPL 19791101 19850508 19870312 TC607170.1s Page 20. Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS KENWORTH TRUCK CO (Continued) D007 D035 F005 644451.00 18981.00 18981.00 Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: Violations exist Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: D008 229.00 F003 Not reported Generator -All Requirements 04/06/1984 Low 08/31/1984 08/22/1984 Written Informal 07/07/1984 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 04/26/1990 Low 07/08/1990 08 /27/1990 Written Informal 06/08/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/01/1998 Low 10/05/1998 10/02/1998 Written Informal 09/08/1998 Not reported Not reported There are 3 violation record(s) reported at this site: 18739.00 Fy�u�ion &e. of Violation • EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Generator -All Requirements Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Generator -All Requirements Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Generator-All Requirements FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: AIRS Facility System (AIRS /AFS) National Compliance Database (NCDB) 1000438637 Date of cgmpliance 10/02/1998 08/27/1990 08/22/1984 TC607170.1s Page 21 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 10 NNW 114 -1/2 1715 Lower MAP FINDINGS KENWORTH TRUCK UST: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: CO (Continued) 423613 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported North Western EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number THOMPSON SITE 8701 E MARGINAL WAY SEATTLE, WA 98108 LUST: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: UST: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 10410 2557 REPORTED CLEANED UP BOEING ISAACSON THOMPSON SOIL Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: 10410 Ecology Region: 2557 Release Date: CLEANUP STARTED Status Date: BOEING ISAACSON THOMPSON SOIL 10410 12/31/64 Not reported Exempt TS 01 Steel- Unprotected HEATING FUEL 1 North Western 10410 12/31/64 Not reported Removed TS 02 Steel - Unprotected LEADED GASOLINE 1 North Western North Western 01/01/1984 06/05/2000 North Western 01/01/1984 06/01/1995 1000438637 UST U000594522 LUST N/A TC607170.1s Page 22 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site D11 NNW 114 -112 2394 Lower MAP FINDINGS THOMPSON SITE (Continued) Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 10410 12/31/64 Not reported Exempt TSO4 Steel- Unprotected USED OILJWASTE OIL 1 North Western EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING ISAACSON THOMPSON 8541 E MARGINAL WAY S SEATTLE, WA 98108 Site 1 of 3 In cluster D RCRIS: Owner. ISAACSON CORP (360) 555 -1212 Contact: P V (206) 763 -8660 Record Date: 01/16/1987 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found U000594522 RCRIS -SGG 1000145041 FINDS WAD980836159 CSCSL SHWS: Facility ID: 2218 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 35 Longitude: 122 18 11 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Not reported Not reported 3 Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported TC607170.1s Page 23 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING ISAACSON THOMPSON (Continued) 1000145041 Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2218 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 35 Longitude: 122 18 11 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 1312 JORGENSEN FORGE CORP FINDS 1000279321 NNW 8531 E MARGINAL WAY S RCRIS-LQG WAD000602813 1/4 -1/2 SEATTLE, WA 98108 TRIS 2433 RAATS Lower Site 2 of 3 In cluster D WA ICR CSCSL TC607170.1s Page 24 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP F1NDINCaS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) 1000279321 RCRIS: Owner. JORGENSEN FORGE CORP Contact: RON ALTIER (206) 762 -1100 Record Date: 12/31/1999 Classification: Large Quantity Generator BIENNIAL REPORTS: Last Biennial Reporting Year. 1997 Waste Quantity (Lbs) K061 196360.00 Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: Violations exist Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Deternined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Not reported Generator -All Requirements 06/01/1988 Low Not reported 06/01/1988 Not reported Generator -Land Ban Requirements 06/01/1988 Low Not reported 06/01/1988 Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/01/1988 Low Not reported 09/01/1988 Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/01/1988 Low Not reported 09/01/1988 Not reported Generator -Land Ban Requirements 09/01/1988 Low Not reported 09/01/1988 Not reported Generator -All Requirements 11/08/1983 Low 03/23/1984 05/02/1984 Written Informal 02/22/1984 TC607170.1s Page 25 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 'MAP FINDINGS . JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 11/08/1983 Low 03/23/1984 05/02/1984 Written Informal 02/22/1984 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/24/1998 Low 11/06/1998 11/11/1998 Written Informal 10/06/1998 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/24/1998 Low 10/09/1998 11/03/1998 Written Informal 10/06/1998 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/24/1998 Low 10/09/1998 11/03/1998 Written Informal 10/06/1998 Not reported Not reported Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/24/1998 Low 11/06/1998 11/09/1998 Written Informal 10/06/1998 Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000279321 TC607170.1s Page 26 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Generator -All Requirements 09/24/1998 Low 11/09/1998 11/11/1998 Written Informal 10/06/1998 Not reported Not reported There are 12 violation record(s) reported at this site: Eva-align_ Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Other Evaluation Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000279321 Date of Boa of V[o10911 S9moliancg Generator -All Requirements 11/11/1998 Generator -All Requirements 11/03/1998 Generator -All Requirements 11/03/1998 Generator -All Requirements 11/09/1998 Generator -All Requirements 11/11/1998 Generator -All Requirements 09/01/1988 Generator -All Requirements 09/01/1988 Generator -Land Ban Requirements 09/01/1988 Generator -All Requirements 06 /01/1988 Generator -Land Ban Requirements 06/01/1988 Generator -Ali Requirements 05/02/1984 Generator -All Requirements 05/02/1984 FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: AIRS Facility System (AIRS /AFS) SHWS: Facility ID: 2382 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 5 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 35 Longitude: 122 18 11 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 5 - Lowest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 27 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS' JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000279321 Facility ID: 2382 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 5 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 35 Longitude: 122 18 11 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 5 - Lowest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confined by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: 05/11/98 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -06 17 Not reported Not reported TC607170.1s Page 28 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: 09/13/99 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Final cleanup report 98 -17 17 Not reported Not reported 09/14/99 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -18 17 Not reported Not reported 05/13/91 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Not reported 91 -29 17 Not reported Not reported 02/13/92 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 92 -19 17 Not reported Not reported 03/09/92 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 92-40 17 Not reported Not reported 05/10/93 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000279321 TC607170.1s Page 29 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site D13 NNW 1/4 -1/2 2433 Lower MAP FINDINGS JORGENSEN FORGE CORP (Continued) Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 92 -51 17 Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EARLE M JORGENSEN COMPANY 8531 E MARGINAL WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98108 Site 3 of 3 in cluster D LUST: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: Facility ID: Release ID: Release Status: Alternate Name: Affected Media: UST: Facility ID: Install Date:. Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 6163 2054 REPORTED CLEANED UP JORGENSEN STEEL SOIL 6163 2054 CLEANUP STARTED JORGENSEN STEEL SOIL 6163 2054 REPORTED CLEANED UP JORGENSEN STEEL GROUND WATER 6163 2054 CLEANUP STARTED JORGENSEN STEEL GROUND WATER 6163 12/31/64 Not reported Removed 2. Not reported LEADED GASOLINE 1 North Western Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: Ecology Region: Release Date: Status Date: North Western 02/26/1991 10/11/1999 North Western 02/26/1991 06/01/1995 North Western 02/26/1991 10/11/1999 North Western 02/26/1991 06/01/1995 1000279321 UST U000590825 LUST N/A TC607170.1s Page 30 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 14 WSW 1/4 -1/2 2633 Higher MAP RIDING S EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number EARLE M JORGENSEN COMPANY (Continued) U000590825 Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: Facility ID: Install Date: Capacity: Status: Tank Name: Tank Material: Substance: Compartment #: Ecology Region: 6163 12/31/64 Not reported Removed 3. Not reported LEADED GASOLINE 1 North Westem 6163 12/31/64 Not reported Removed 1. GASOLINE Not reported LEADED GASOLINE 1 North Western S 96TH ST DITCH S 96TH ST / DUWAMISH RIVER SEATTLE, WA 98108 CSCSL S102258309 N/A SHWS: Facility ID: 2058 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 28 Longitude: 122 18 8 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants -. Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Suspected to be present Pesticides: Suspected to be present Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Suspected to be present Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Suspected to be present Reactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present TC607170.1s Page 31 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site .MAPF IDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S 96TH ST DITCH (Continued) S102258309 Radioactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Suspected to be present Facility ID: 2058 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 28 Longitude: 12218 8 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Surface Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Suspected to be present Pesticides: Suspected to be present Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Suspected to be present Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Suspected to be present Reactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Suspected to be present Facility ID: 2058 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 28 Longitude: 122 18 8 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Air Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site TC607170.1s Page 32 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS,. S 96TH ST DITCH (Continued) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Suspected to be present Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Suspected to be present Reactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Suspected to be present EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S102258309 Facility ID: 2058 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 28 Longitude: 12218 8 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Suspected to be present Pesticides: Suspected to be present Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Suspected to be present Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Reactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Facility ID: 2058 Facility Status: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 33 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 15 NNW 1/2 -1 2771 Lower MAP FINDINGS'' EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number S 96TH ST DITCH (Continued) S102258309 Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 28 Longitude: 122 18 8 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Sediments Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Suspected to be present Pesticides: Suspected to be present Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Suspected to be present Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Suspected to be present Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Reactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes: Suspected to be present Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Suspected to be present RHODIA INC 9229 E MARGINAL WY S RHODIA SEATTLE, WA 98108 CERCLIS -NFRAP Classification Data: Site Incident Category: Not reported Ownership Status: Other CERCLIS -NFRAP Assessment History: Assessment: DISCOVERY Assessment: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT Assessment: SITE INSPECTION Assessment: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT CERCLIS -NFRAP Alias Name(s): MONSANTO CO SEATTLE PLANT Federal Facility: NPL Status: Completed: Completed: Completed: Completed: RCRIS -SQG FINDS RAATS TSCA CORRACTS CERC -NFRAP CSCSL 1000311727 WAD009282302 Not a Federal Facility Not on the NPL 19790701 19790701 19791121 19880603 CORRACTS Data: Prioritization: High Status: RCRA Facility Assessment Completed, Determination of Need for a RCRA Facility Investigation, RFI Imposition, RFI Workplan Approved, RCRA Facility Investigation Approved, Stabilization Measures Evaluation, Stabilization Measures Implemented TC607170.1s Page 34 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS ?' RHODIA INC (Continued) RCRIS Corrective Action Summary: Effective Date: 05/06/1993 Legal Authority: RCRA 3008(h) or equivalent RCRIS: Owner. RHODIA INC (732) 297 -0100 Contact: EDWARD PETRIE (732) 821 -3446 Record Date: 11/09/1998 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: Violations exist Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Not reported TSD- Financial Responsibility Requirements 03/31/1988 Low 07/30/1988 07/19/1988 Written Informal 06/14/1988 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD - Groundwater Monitoring Requirements 07/10/1998 Low 08/18/1998 09/14/1998 Initial Formal 3008(a) Compliance Order 07/10/1998 $ 321,500.00 Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 08/27/1998 Low Not reported 09/14/1998 Initial Formal 3008(a) Compliance Order 07/10/1998 $ 321,500.00 Not reported Not reported Compliance Schedule Violation 10/06/1999 Low 10/22/1999 10/06/1999 Written Informal 10/08/1999 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000311727 TC607170.1s Page 35 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP F NOINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number RHODIA INC (Continued) 1000311727 Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Not reported Regulation Violated: Not reported Area of Violation: Generator -All Requirements Date Violation Determined: 11/03/1999 Priority of Violation: Low Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: 01/31/2000 Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 01/31/2000 Enforcement Action: Written Informal Enforcement Action Date: 11/03/1999 Proposed Monetary Penalty: Not reported Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Regulation Violated: Not reported Area of Violation: Compliance Schedule Violation Date Violation Determined: 10/25/1999 Priority of Violation: Low Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: 01/03/2000 Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 01/31/2000 Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Initial Formal 3008(a) Compliance Order 11/04/1999 Not reported $ 159,500.00 Regulation Violated: Not reported Area of Violation: TSD- Financial Responsibility Requirements Date Violation Determined: 01/30/1986 Priority of Violation: Low Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: 08/15/1986 Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 08 /15/1986 Enforcement Action: Written Informal Enforcement Action Date: 06 /16/1986 Proposed Monetary Penalty: Not reported Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Regulation Violated: Not reported Area of Violation: TSD -Other Requirements Date Violation Determined: 01/30/1986 Priority of Violation: Low Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: 07/31/1986 Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 07/31/1986 Enforcement Action: Written Informal Enforcement Action Date: 06/16/1986 Proposed Monetary Penalty: Not reported Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported Regulation Violated: Not reported Area of Violation: TSD -Other Requirements Date Violation Determined: 06/30 /1990 Priority of Violation: Low Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: 08/12/1990 Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 08 /12/1990 Enforcement Action: Written Informal Enforcement Action Date: 07/12/1990 Proposed Monetary Penalty: Not reported Final Monetary Penalty: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 36. Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS RHODIA INC (Continued) Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: Enforcement Action: Enforcement Action Date: Proposed Monetary Penalty: Final Monetary Penalty: Regulation Violated: Area of Violation: Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 06/30/1990 Low 08/15/1990 08/24/1990 Written Informal 07/12/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 06/30/1990 Low 08/15/1990 08/24/1990 Written Informal 07/12/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 06/30/1990 Low 08/15/1990 08/24/1990 Written Informal 07/12/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 06/30/1990 Low 08/15/1990 08/24/1990 Written Informal 07/12/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements 06/30/1990 Low 08/15/1990 08/24/1990 Written Informal 07/12/1990 Not reported Not reported Not reported TSD -Other Requirements EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000311727 TC607170.1s Page 37 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP Ft NOINGS RHODIA INC (Continued) Date Violation Determined: Priority of Violation: Schedule Date to Achieve Compliance: Actual Date Achieved Compliance: 06/20/1990 Low Not reported 08 /24/1990 There are 15 violation record(s) reported at this site: Evaluation Other Evaluation Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Other Evaluation Non - Financial Record Review Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI) EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number tea of Violation Compliance Schedule Violation Generator -All Requirements Compliance Schedule Violation TSD- Groundwater Monitoring Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD -Other Requirements TSD - Financial Responsibility Requirements TSD - Financial Responsibility Requirements TSD -Other Requirements 1000311727 Date of Compliance 01/31/2000 01/31/2000 10/06/1999 09/14/1998 09/14/1998 08/12/1990 08/24/1990 08/24/1990 08/24/1990 08/24/1990 08/24/1990 08/24/1990 07/19/1988 08/15/1986 07/31/1986 FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: Enforcement Docket System (DOCKET) National Compliance Database (NCDB) Permit Compliance System (PCS) SHWS: Facility ID: 2150 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 55 Longitude: 122 18 16 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 19 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 38 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 16 ENE 1/2 -1 3293 Higher MAP FINDINGS RHODIA INC (Continued) Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000311727 Facility ID: 2150 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported. Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 55 Longitude: 122 18 16 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 19 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non -priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Suspected to be present Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels KHY 8 LI PROPERTY CSCSL S100079822 9056 37TH AVE S N/A SEATTLE, WA 98118 SHWS: Facility ID: Not reported Facility Status: AWAITING R Rank: 5 Flag: HSL Responsible Unit: Not reported Latitude: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 39 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site '•MAP FINDINGS''• ,'. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number KHY & U PROPERTY (Continued) S100079822 Longitude: Not reported Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Not reported Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Not reported Media Status: Not reported Base /NeutraUAcid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: Not reported EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 17 BOEING ISAACSON PROPERTY NNW 8625 E MARGINAL WAY 112 -1 SEATTLE, WA 98108 3504 Lower CSCSL S104490866 N/A SHWS: Facility ID: 1138721 Facility Status: AWAITING RA Rank: 3 Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 22 Longitude: 122 18 4 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /NeutralAcid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 40 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number BOEING ISAACSON PROPERTY (Continued) S104490866 Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 1138721 Facility Status: AWAITING RA Rank: 3 Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 22 Longitude: 122 18 4 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non -priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 18 NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING SSE 10230 E MARGINAL WY S 112 -1 TUKWILA, WA 98168 3566 Higher SHWS: Facility ID: 2287 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE CSCSL S101703218 N/A TC607170.1s Page 41 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING (Continued) S101703218 Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 41 Longitude: 12217 36 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non -priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2287 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 41 Longitude: 122 17 36 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Surface Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Suspected to be present TC607170.1 s Page 42 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING (Continued) Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number Facility ID: 2287 Facility Status: Not reported. Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 41 Longitude: 122 17 36 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number Indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Air Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Suspected to be present 3 Suspected to be present Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Facility ID: 2287 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 41 Longitude: 122 17 36 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported S101703216 TC607170.1s Page 43 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 'FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING (Continued) S101703218 WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA deanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2287 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 41 Longitude: 122 17 36 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Awaiting Site Hazard Assessment (SHA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Sediments Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Suspected to be present Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Suspected to be present Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Suspected to be present Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 44 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FtNOINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number NORTHWEST AUTO WRECKING (Continued) S101703218 Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 19 KRS MARINE West 1621 S 92ND PLACE 1/2 -1 SEATTLE, WA 98108 3580 Higher CSCSL S104780219 N/A SHWS: Facility ID: 90355185 Facility Status: AWAITING RA Rank: 3 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 14 Longitude: 122 1844 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil • Media Status: R (Remediated) - Contaminants have been treated, removed, or contained to meet cleanup levels established for the site. (This status determination may only be made by Ecology Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Treated, removed, or contained Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 20 MALARKEY ASPHALT CO RCRIS -SQG 1001121615 NW 8700 DALLAS AV S FINDS WAR000010413 112 -1 SEATTLE, WA 98108 CSCSL 3844 Lower TC607170.1s Page 45 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP. FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MALARKEY ASPHALT CO (Continued) 1001121615 RCRIS: Owner. MALARKEY ASPHALT CO Contact: LINDA DAWSON (425) 744 -1489 Record Date: 12/31/1999 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found FINDS: Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site: Enforcement Docket System (DOCKET) National Compliance Database (NCDB) PCB Handler Activity Data System (PADS) SHWS: Facility ID: 2202 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 1 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 34 Longitude: 12218 42 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 1 - Greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Pesticides: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2202 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA TC607170.1s Page 46 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MALARKEY ASPHALT CO (Continued) 1001121615 Rank: 1 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 34 Longitude: 122 18 42 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 1 - Greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Surface Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2202 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 1 Flag: STATE /HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 34 Longitude: 122 18 42 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 1 - Greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Air Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Suspected to be present 3 Not reported Not reported Not reported TC607170.1s Page 47 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS MALARKEY ASPHALT CO (Continued) Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1001121615 Facility ID: 2202 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 1 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 34 Longitude: 122 18 42 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 1 - Greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confined) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Pesticides: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 2202 Facility Status: INDEPENDENT RA Rank: 1 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 31 34 Longitude: 122 18 42 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action TC607170.1s Page 48 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 21 SW 1/2 -1 3924 Higher MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MALARKEY ASPHALT CO (Continued) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 1 - Greatest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Sediments Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 3 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Not reported Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 1001121615 MOIMOI PROPERTY CSCSL S103398172 10118 DES MOINES MEMORIAL DR S N/A SEATTLE, WA 98168 SHWS: Facility ID: Facility Status: Rank: 95231135 AWAITING RA 5 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 46 Longitude: 122 18 37 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Ranked, Awaiting Remedial Action (RA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 5 - Lowest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Not reported Not reported 4 Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present TC607170.1s Page 49 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDING$ EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number MOIMOI PROPERTY (Continued) S103398172 Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Facility ID: 95231135 Facility Status: AWAITING RA Rank: 5 Flag: STATE/HSL Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 46 Longitude: 122 18 37 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Ranked, Awaiting Remedial Action (RA) Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): 5 - Lowest assessed risk to human health and to the environment Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirned by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 4 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Suspected to be present Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Suspected to be present Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 22 HYSTER SALES SE 9892 40TH AV S 112 -1 SEATTLE, WA 98118 4545 Higher RCRIS -SQG 1001806781 FINDS WAD988495339 WA ICR CSCSL TC607170.1s Page 50 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HYSTER SALES (Continued) RCRIS: Owner. Contact: Record Date: Classification: H Pape (360) 555 -1212 MARTY SHEYTHE (206) 722 -5800 12/31/1998 Not reported Used 011 Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found SHWS: Facility ID: 2595 Facility Status: AWAITING RA Rank: 4 Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 36 Longitude: 122 17 0 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: S (Suspected) - Due to preliminary investigations or the nature of business operations or manufacturing processes, certain contaminants are suspected to be present at the site Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Facility ID: Facility Status: Rank: Flag: Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 36 Longitude: 122 17 0 2595 AWAITING RA 4 STATE Not reported Not reported 99 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Suspected to be present Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 1001806781 TC607170.1s Page 51 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HYSTER SALES (Continued) 1001806781 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Independent Site Assessment of Interim Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 99 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: 05/03/91 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Not reported 91 -30 17 Not reported Not reported 09/11/96 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94-40 17 Not reported Not reported 03/26/96 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report TC607170.1s Page 52, Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site 23 West 1/2 -1 4550 Lower MAP FINDINGS EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number HYSTER SALES (Continued) 1001806781 Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: 94-40 17 Not reported Not reported 11/21/95 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94-40 17 Not reported Not reported 02/17/95 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94-40 17 Not reported Not reported PRECISION ENGINEERING 1231 S DIRECTOR ST SEATTLE, WA 98108 SHWS: Facility ID: Facility Status: Rank: 5 Flag: HSL Responsible Unit: Not reported Latitude: Not reported Longitude: Not reported Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Not reported Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Not reported WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Media Status: Not reported Base /Neutral/Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported AWAITING R Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported CSCSL S102507276 N/A TC607170.1s Page 53 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site • MAP FINDINGS.. EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number PRECISION ENGINEERING (Continued) S102507276 Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported Corrosive Wastes: Not reported Radioactive Wastes: Not reported Asbestos: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Not reported Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported 24 CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 SSE 10805 E MARGINAL WY 1/2 -1 TUKWILA, WA 98168 5092 Higher RCRIS: Owner. CHEVRON PRODUCTS CO (360) 555 -1212 Contact: SARAH ORTIZ EDWARDS (510) 842 -9631 Record Date: 12/31/1993 Classification: Not reported Used Oil Recyc: No Violation Status: No violations found RCRIS -SOG 1000838967 FINDS WAD988517868 WA ICR CSCSL SHWS: Facility ID: 2551 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 30 19 Longitude: 122 17 33 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Ground Water Media Status: C (Confirmed) - The presence of hazardous substances above MTCA cleanup levels has been confirmed by laboratory analysis (or field determination in the case of petroleum contamination) Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Not reported Halogenated Organic Compounds: Not reported Horizontal Collection Method: 18 EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Not reported Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Not reported Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Not reported Pesticides: Not reported Petroleum Products: Confirmed above MTCA cleanup levels Phenolic Compounds: Not reported Non - Halogenated Solvents: Not reported Dioxin: Not reported Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Not reported Reactive Wastes: Not reported TC607170.1s Page 54 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MA F P INDINGS CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 (Continued) Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000838967 Facility ID: 2551 Facility Status: Not reported Rank: Not reported Flag: STATE Responsible Unit: NW Latitude: 47 3019 Longitude: 12217 33 Ecology Site Status relative to the MTCA cleanup process: Independent Remedial Action Independent Site Status - those sites undergoing an independent cleanup: Final Independent Remedial Action Report received WARM Bin Number indicates the outcome of the Washington Ranking Model (WARM): Not reported Affected Media: Soil Media Status: R (Remediated) - Contaminants have been treated, removed, or contained to meet cleanup levels established for the site. (This status determination may only be made by Ecology Base /Neutral /Acid Organics: Halogenated Organic Compounds: Horizontal Collection Method: EPA Priority Pollutants - Metals and Cyanide: Metals - Other non - priority pollutant medals: Polychlorinated biPhenyls (PCBs): Pesticides: Petroleum Products: Phenolic Compounds: Non - Halogenated Solvents: Dioxin: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH): Reactive Wastes: Corrosive Wastes: Radioactive Wastes: Asbestos: Conventional Contaminants, Organic: Conventional Contaminants, Inorganic: WA ICR: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Not reported Not reported 18 Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Treated, removed, or contained Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported 12/08/97 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 95 -17 17 Not reported Not reported 07/06/98 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank TC607170.1s Page 55 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 (Continued) Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -11 17 Not reported Not reported 08/07/98 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -14 17 Not reported Not reported 01/22/99 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -15 17 Not reported Not reported 11/18/98 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -15 17 Not reported Not reported 01/17/00 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 98 -27 17 Not reported Not reported 01/12/00 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000838967 TC607170.1s Page 56 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 (Continued) Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received. Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: 98 -27 17 Not reported Not reported 10/12/93 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 93 -23 17 Not reported Not reported // Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 90 -16 17 Not reported Not reported 01/23/91 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 91 -21 17 Not reported Not reported 03 /25/91 Petroleum products Groundwater Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 91 -26 17 Not reported Not reported 01/30/93 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 92 -50 17 EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000838967 TC607170.1 s Page 57 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft.) Elevation Site MAP FINDINGS CHEVRON STA 6009 3099 (Continued) Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Date Ecology Received Report: Contaminants Found at Site: Media Contaminated: Cause of Contamination: Region: Type of Report Ecology Received: Site Register Issue: County Code: Contact: Report Title: Not reported Not reported 11/06/95 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94 -19 17 Not reported Not reported 06/19/96 Petroleum products Groundwater, Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94 -43 17 Not reported Not reported 03/07/97 Petroleum products Soil Tank North Westem Interim cleanup report 94 -49 17 Not reported Not reported EDR ID Number Database(s) EPA ID Number 1000838967 TC607170.1s Page 58 City SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE SEATTLE EDR ID S104490888 S103506798 S104490889 S104223669 5103510367 1000189945 S103508429 S104484977 S103850809 S103506550 S103508792 S104851935 S104851936 S104851937 S104320380 S103503667 S104484601 S104484739 5103505624 S104851908 0003750488 S104584304 5104584307 1001475762 S103505620 S103503377 5103509905 S103850615 S104782962 S104223457 5104223707 Site Name RICCHIAZZI INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY EVERGREEN MARINE LEASING (THREE RE STIPE CROW PESCHEL RESIDENCE SR 99 & FIRST AVE. BRIDGE SPILL/WS UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD LAIDLAW NORTHWEST ENVIRO SERVICE MOBIL CANAL BULK PLANT FEDERAL AVIATION ADM CITY OF SEATTLE/UNION PACIFIC RR R RASMUSSEN EQUIPMENT UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR UPRR DIAGONAL AVE S SPUR SEATTLE CITY LIGHT STEAMPLANT GEOR BAXTER RUTHERFORD UNOCAL #3707 UNOCAL #3707 (TWO REPORTS) BOEING - NORTH FIELD - FIRE TRAINI JIMS MARKET & GAS HELMER'S AUTO PARTS BOEING A &M DEVELOPMENT CENTER BOEING CO N BOEING FIELD SEATTLE, CY OF, 1ST AV BRG LDFL BOEING - NORTH BOEING FIELD ARCO #5246 TEXACO #004502 SOUTHLAND #27390 SHOUTHLAND #27390 EXXON #7 9049 EXXON #7 9049 (TWO REPORTS) ORPHAN SUMMARY Site Address Zip Database(s) 4424 / 4500 4TH AVE S 7310 - 7350 8TH AVE. S. 8694 / 8696 ISLAND DR S SR 99 / FIRST AVE. BRIDGE 4TH S. AND DAWSON 77391ST AVE S 1ST AVE. S. 4401 11TH AVE. NW BEACON HILL 7500 BLOCK OF E. MARGINAL WAY 415 S. COVERDALE ST. 60 DIAGONAL S 60 DIAGONAL S 60 DIAGONAL S 1300 S GREELY ST 911 S. HOSMER ST. 6956 ML KING JR WAY S. 6956 ML KING JR WAY S. KING COUNTY AIRPORT 7500 M L KING JR WAY S 6700 M L KING JR WAY S 9725 E MARGINAL WAY S 7500 E MARGINAL WY E MARGINAL WY S & FIDALGO ST E. MARGINAL WAY 5620 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY 6600 MARTIN LUTHER KING 6061 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY 6061 MARTIN LUTHER KING WAY 6056 MLK JR. WAY S. 6056 MLK JR. WAY S. 98108 CSCSL 98108 WA ICR 98118 CSCSL WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98108 RCRIS -SOG, FINDS, UST, WA ICR, 12778 CSCSL 98108 WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98108 CSCSL 98108 CSCSL 98108 CSCSL 98108 CSCSL 98108 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98108 WA ICR 98118 CSCSL 98118 UST, WA ICR 98108 HAZNET 98108 HAZNET 98108 CERC -NFRAP 98108 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR 98118 WA ICR Facility ID 45819189 78724276 5246138 5246138 5246138 6487827 94253462 548239 TC607170.1s Page 59 - - - - • - - - - - - • - - Code Description D001 IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY- MARTENS CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. 0002 A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. D003 A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. D004 ARSENIC D005 BARIUM D006 CADMIUM D007 CHROMIUM D008 LEAD D009 MERCURY D010 SELENIUM D011 SILVER D018 BENZENE D035 METHYL ETHYL KETONE D040 TRICHLOROETHYLENE F001 THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS USED IN DEGREASING: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, 1,1,1- TRICHLOROETHANE, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, AND CHLORINATED FLUOROCARBONS; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES /BLENDS USED IN DEGREASING CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. TC607170.1s - Page EPA -1 _PA Waste Codes Addendum Description F002 THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1- TRICHLOROETHANE, CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2- TRICHLORO- 1,2,2- TRIFLUOROETHANE, ORTHO - DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND 1,1,2- TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES /BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F003 THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON - HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N -BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON - HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES /BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON - HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005 THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON - HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, 2- ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2- NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES /BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON - HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. K061 EMISSION CONTROL DUST /SLUDGE FROM THE PRIMARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC FURNACES. 0001 ACETALDEHYDE (I) 0001 ETHANAL (I) U003 ACETONITRILE (I,T) U069 1,2- BENZENEDICARBOXYLIC ACID, DIBUTYL ESTER U069 DIBUTYL PHTHALATE U112 ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER (I) U112 ETHYL ACETATE (I) U121 METHANE, TRICHLOROFLUORO - U121 TRICHLOROMONOFLUOROMETHANE U170 P- NITROPHENOL U170 PHENOL, 4- NITRO- TC607170.1s - Page EPA -2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED DATA CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone: N/A National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC). Date of Govemment Version: 01/23/01 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/05/01 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/16/01 Elapsed ASTM days: 11 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/05/01 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Date of Govemment Version: 01/23/01 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/05/01 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/16/01 Elapsed ASTM days: 11 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/05/01 CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703 -413 -0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Govemment Version: 04 /16/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 08/16/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06/05/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 72 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/00 CERCLIS - NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Source: EPA Telephone: 703 -413 -0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites. Date of Govemment Version: 04 /16/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 08/16/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06/05/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 72 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/00 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800 -424 -9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC607170.1s Page GR -1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACN Date of Govemment Version: 04 /20/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 08/01/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 06/12/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 50 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/11/00 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800 -424 -9346 Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Date of Govemment Version: 06 /21/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 07/31/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi- Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 07/10/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/30/01 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 202 - 260 -2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores Information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Govemment Version: 08/08/00 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 08/11/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 09/06/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 26 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/02/01 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800 -424 -9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/97 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/19/00 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/19/01 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source: EPA Regional Offices Telephone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Date of Govemment Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Source: NTIS Telephone: 703 -416 -0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Govemment Version: 09/30/99 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/09/01 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/01 DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: N/A The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. TC607170.1s Page GR -2 GOVERNMENT :RECORDS SEARCHED/ DATA CURRENCY TRACK/ • Date of Govemment Version: 01/23/01 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/05/01 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05/07/01 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Fadlity Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track Information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C- DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Govemment Version: 07/07/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/09/01 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/09/01 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202 - 366 -4526 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Govemment Version: 05/31/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/23/01 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/01 MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301 -415 -7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Govemment Version: 04 /23/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/09/01 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04 /09/01 MINES: Mines Master Index File Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303 - 231 -5959 Date of Govemment Version: 08 /01/98 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/01 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04 /02/01 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 205 - 564 -4267 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Govemment Version: 10/15/91 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/20/01 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/01 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 260 -3936 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and /or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Govemment Version: 01/01/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/12/01 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/01 TC607170.1s Page GR -3 GOVERNMENT'' RECORDS SEARCHED !DATA CURRENCY; TRACKING.:. RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 564 -4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources . made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Govemment Version: 04 /17/95 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/11/00 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/01 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 260 -1531 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/97 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/27/00 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/01 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 260 -1444 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/98 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/12/00 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/12/01 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202 - 260 -7864 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right- to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Govemment Version: 08/30/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/30/01 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/26/01 FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202 -564 -2501 Date of Govemment Version: 08/10/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/28/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 03/26/01 STATE OF WASHINGTON ASTM STANDARD RECORDS CSCSL: Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites List Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -7200 State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. TC607170.1s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1 DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Govemment Version: 11/30/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/13/01 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually HSL: Hazardous Sites List Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -7200 The Hazardous Sites List is a subset of the CSCSL using the Washington Ranking Method (WARM). Date of Govemment Version: 08 /29/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 10/10/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/19/01 Elapsed ASTM days: 22 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/19/01 Report. It includes sites which have been assessed and ranked Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 09/12/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 28 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/11/00 SWFILF: Solid Waste Facility Database Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360107 -6132 Solid Waste Facilities /Landfill Sites. SWF /LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills' or disposal sites. Date of Govemment Version: 09/01/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 12/22/00 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/30/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 22 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01 /08/01 LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Site List Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -7200 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored vanes by state. Date of Govemment Version: 10/06/00 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/30/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -7170 Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible information vanes by state program. Date of Govemment Version: 10 /06 /00 Date Made Active at EDR: 11/10/00 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly STATE OF WASHINGTON ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/30/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 31 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/07/01 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery for administering the UST program. Available Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/30/00 Elapsed ASTM days: 11 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/07/01 ICR: Independent Cleanup Reports Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -7200 These are remedial action reports Ecology has received from either the owner or operator of the sites. These actions have been conducted without department oversight or approval and are not under an order or decree. Date of Govemment Version: 11/30/00 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/19/01 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/21/01 EMI: Washington Emissions Data System Source: Department of Ecology Telephone: 360 -407 -6040 TC607170.1s Page GR -5 .GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED f DATA CURRENCY TRACKIN Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/97 Database Release Frequency: Annually LOCAL RECORDS KING COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/23/01 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/01 Abandoned Landfill Study In King County Source: Seattle -King County Department of Public Health Telephone: 206 - 296 -4785 The King County Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted from October through December 1984 by the Health Department's Environmental Health Division at the request of the King County Council. The primary objective of the survey was to determine if any public health problems existed at the predetermined 24 sites. Date of Govemment Version: 04 /30/85 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE COUNTY: Abandoned Landfill Study In the City of Seattle Source: Seattle - King County Department of Public Health Telephone: 206 - 296 -4785 The Seattle Abandoned Landfill Survey was conducted in June and Health Division at the request of the Mayor's Office. The primary any public health problems existed at the predetermined 12 sites Date of Govemment Version: 07/30/84 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned SEATTLE /KING COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/21/94 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: WA July of 1984 by the Health Department's Environmental objective of the survey was to determine if Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/21/94 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Seattle - King County Abandoned Landfill Toxicity / Hazard Assessment Project Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 206 - 296 -4785 This report presents the Seattle -King County Health Department's follow -up investigation of two city owned and four county owned abandoned landfills which was conducted from February to December 1986. Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/86 Date of Last EDR Contact: 08/14/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A SNOHOMISH COUNTY: Solid Waste Sites of Record at Snohomish Health District Source: Snohomish Health District Telephone: 206 - 339 -5250 Date of Govemment Version: 06 /13/00 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually TACOMAIPIERCE COUNTY: Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/22/01 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/23/01 Closed Landfill Survey Source: Tacoma - Pierce County Health Department Telephone: 206- 591 -6500 Following numerous requests for information about closed dumpsites and landfills in Pierce County, the Tacoma - Pierce County Health Department decided to conduct a study on the matter. The aim of the study was to evaluate public health risks associated with the closed dumpsites and landfills, and to determine the need, if any, for further investigations of a more detailed nature. The sites represent all of the known dumpsites and landfills closed after 1950. TC607170.1s Page GR -6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED 1. DATA CURRENCY TRACKI Date of Govemment Version: 04 /15/93 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/11/95 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A EDR PROPRIETARY DATABASES Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. eCopyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative. Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc. The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to Insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid. No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion. HISTORICAL AND OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this, report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands In the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. 011 /Gas Pipelines/Electrical Transmission Lines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000 -Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines and electrical transmission lines. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. TC607170.1s Page GR -7 •GEOCHECK ®- PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM,, TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS MUSEUM OF FLIGHT /GEOENGINEERS 9404 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH SEATTLE, WA 98108 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (West): Universal Tranverse Mercator: UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): 47.520599 - 47' 31' 14.2" 122.297798 - 122' 17' 52.1" Zone 10 552865.9 5263039.5 EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with ASTM 1527 -00, Section 7.2.3. Section 7.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent, such as the USGS Digital Elevation Model) be reviewed. It also requires that one or more additional physical setting sources be sought when (1) conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to migrate to or from the property, and (2) more information than is provided in the current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent) is generally obtained, pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice, to assess the impact of migration of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Such additional physical setting sources generally include information about the topographic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and geologic characteristics of a site, and wells in the area. Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. TC607170.1s Page A -1 GEOCHECI O *PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Site-Specific Hydrogeologlcal Data*: Search Radius: 2.0 miles Location Relative to TP: 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SSE Site Name: DIMENSIONAL ENGINEERING Site EPA ID Number. WAD079247474 Groundwater Flow Direction: NW Inferred Depth to Water: 13 feet Hydraulic Connection: Based on a soil boring, the site is underlain by sands to a depth of 96 feel Sole Source Aquifer: A sole source aquifer is not persent at or near the site Data Quality: Information is inferred in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 2.000 Miles. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. MAP ID 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 LOCATION FROM TP 1/2 -1 Mile SW 1/2 -1 Mile West 1 - 2 Miles SSE 1 - 2 Miles NNW 1 - 2 Miles West 1 - 2.Miles NW 1 - 2 Miles NW 1 - 2 Miles NNE 1 - 2 Miles East 1 - 2 Miles NE 1 - 2 Miles NNW 1 - 2 Miles NW GENERAL DIRECTION GROUNDWATER FLOW NW W Not Reported W NNE W Not Reported Not Reported NNE SE W SW For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy - gravelly types of soils than silty - clayey types of soils. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may be occurring. GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT Geologic Code: Era: System: Series: ITa Cenozoic Tertiary Lower Tertiary andesite Category: Volcanic Rocks • 01996 Ste—specific hydropeciogical data gathered by CERCUS Awls. Inc.. Bainbridge Island WA. M rights reserved. AI of the Mormeuon and optims Rid ere ease of 910 cited EPA repan(s). which were completed uncle a Comprehensive Enviom,meel Response Compensation end Unity Information System (CER0.1S1 Imesegeem. TC607170.1s Page A -3 PHYSICAL` SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY. . GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site - specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE Target Property: 2447122 -E3 SEATTLE SOUTH, WA Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index GENERAL TOPOGRAPHIC GRADIENT AT TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: General NNW Source: General Topographic Gradient has been determined from the USGS 1 Degree Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways and bodies of water). FEMA FLOOD ZONE Target Property County KING, WA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Quad at Target Property SEATTLE SOUTH FEMA Q3 Flood Data Electronic Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 53033C0645F / CWPP 53033C0640F / CWPP NWI Electronic Coverage YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TC607170.1s Page A -2 Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Amdt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil pattems in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name: PILCHUCK Soil Surface Texture: loamy sand Hydrologic Group: Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downward movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat excessive. Soils have high hydraulic conductivity and low water holding capacity. Depth to water table is more than 6 feet. Hydric Status: Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: MODERATE Depth to Bedrock Min: Depth to Bedrock Max: > 60 inches > 60 inches TC607170.1s Page A-4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Permeability Soil Reaction (pH) 1 0 inches 20 inches loamy sand Granular materials (35 pct. or less passing No. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. COURSE - GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. Max: 20.00 Min: 6.00 Max: 7.30 Min: 6.10 2 20 inches 38 inches sand Granular materials (35 pct. or Tess passing No. 200), Silty, or Clayey Gravel and Sand. COURSE - GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. Max: 20.00 Min: 6.00 Max: 7.30 Min: 5.60 3 38 inches 60 inches gravelly - sand Granular materials (35 pct. or Tess passing No. 200), Stone Fragments, Gravel and Sand. COURSE - GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Clean Sands, Poorly graded sand. Max: 20.00 Min: 20.00 Max: 7.30 Min: 6.10 TC607170.1s Page A-4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Rare Permeability Soil Reaction (pH) 4 60 inches 70 inches fine sandy loam Silt -Clay Materials (more than 35 pct. passing No. 200), Silty Soils. COURSE - GRAINED SOILS, Sands, Sands with fines, Silty Sand. Max: 6.00 Min: 2.00 Max: 6.50 Min: 5.60 OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property. Soil Surface Textures: fine sandy loam silt loam silty clay loam gravelly - loam gravelly - coarse sand muck loam Surficial Soil Types: fine sandy loam silt loam silty day loam gravelly - loam gravelly - coarse sand muck loam Shallow Soil Types: fine sandy loam silty clay loam silt loam peaty - silt loam loam sandy loam Deeper Soil Types: silt loam silty clay loam very gravelly - coarse sand stratified loamy fine sand very gravelly - sand sapric material sand very gravelly - loamy sand loamy sand TC607170.1s Page A -5 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES According to ASTM E 1527 -00, Section 7.2.2, one or more additional state or local sources of environmental records may be checked, in the discretion of the environmental professional, to enhance and supplement federal and state sources... Factors to consider in determining which local or additional state records, if any, should be checked include (1) whether they are reasonably ascertainable, (2) whether they are sufficiently useful, accurate, and complete in light of the objective of the records review (see 7.1.1), and (3) whether they are obtained, pursuant to local, good commercial or customary practice? One of the record sources listed in Section 7.2.2 is water well information. Water well information can be used to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles) Federal USGS Federal FRDS PWS State Database 1.000 Nearest PWS within 1 mile 1.000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP Al 473100122173201 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SE A2 473056122173001 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SE 5 473028122175701 1/2 - 1 Mile South FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PWS System Found Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION MAP ID WELL ID No Wells Found LOCATION FROM TP TC607170.1s Page A -6 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 607170.1s cb 6W 108TH ST SW 116TH ST W 128TH ST yY28TH ST Ai Major Roads AJ Contour Lines Airports ® Water Wells © Public Water Supply Wells Groundwater Flow Direction Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location Groundwater Flow Varies at Location • Cluster of Multiple Icons (ct); 0 2 Miss () Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater ® Closest Hydrogeologlcal Data TARGET PROPERTY: Museum of Ffight/GeoEngineers ADDRESS: 9404 East Marginal Way South CITY /STATE/ZIP: Seattle WA 98108 LAT /LONG: 47.5206 / 122.2978 CUSTOMER: Geo Engineers, Inc. CONTACT: Dave Cook INQUIRY #: 607170.1s DATE: March 15, 2001 1:14 pm Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Al SE 114- 1 /2Mile Higher BASIC WELL DATA Site Type: Year Constructed: Altitude: Well Depth: Depth to Water Table: Date Measured: Database EDR ID Number Single well, other tha Not Reported 15.00 ft. 720.00 ft. Not Reported Not Reported n collector or Ranney type County: State: Topographic Setting: Prim. Use of Site: Prim. Use of Water Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Destroyed Not Reported FED USGS 473100122173201 A2 SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher BASIC WELL DATA Site Type: Year Constructed: Altitude: Well Depth: Depth to Water Table: Date Measured: Single well, other tha Not Reported 15.00 ft. 720.00 ft. 9.24 ft. 09181953 n collector or Ranney type County: State: Topographic Setting: Prim. Use of Site: Prim. Use of Water. FED USGS 473056122173001 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Withdrawal of water Industrial 3 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher Site ID: 2212 Groundwater Flow: NW Shallowest Water Table Depth: 8.7 11.0 Deepest Water Table Depth: Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 04 /22/1991 AQUIFLOW 61244 4 West 1/2 -1 Mile Higher Site ID: 1476 Groundwater Flow: W Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Average Water Table Depth: 12.5 Date: 12/05/1990 AQUIFLOW 61185 5 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher BASIC WELL DATA Site Type: Year Constructed: Altitude: Well Depth: Depth to Water Table: Date Measured: Single well, other tha 1950 15.00 ft. 20.00 ft. Not Reported Not Reported n collector or Ranney type County: State: Topographic Setting: Prim. Use of Site: Prim. Use of Water. FED USGS 473028122175701 Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Withdrawal of water Irrigation TC607170.1s Page A -8 Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 6 SSE 1 - 2 Mlles Higher .. GEOCHECK '- `,PHYSICAL, SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Site ID: 2244011310 Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Shallowest Water Table Depth: 9 Deepest Water Table Depth: 10 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: Not Reported Database EDR ID Number AQUIFLOW 60986 7 NNW 1 -2 Miles Lower Site ID: 4073 Groundwater Flow: W Shallowest Water Table Depth: 4 Deepest Water Table Depth: 10 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 11/03/1992 AQUIFLOW 61378 8 West 1 - 2 Miles Higher Site ID: 29883936 Groundwater Flow: NNE Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Average Water Table Depth: 11 Date: 03/02/1998 AQUIFLOW 61068 9 NW 1 - 2 Miles Lower Site ID: 5290 Groundwater Flow: W Shallowest Water Table Depth: 4 Deepest Water Table Depth: 6.5 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 04/13/1994 AQUIFLOW 61360 10 NW 1 - 2 Miles Lower Site ID: 4431008342 Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Shallowest Water Table Depth: 8.86 Deepest Water Table Depth: 10.91 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: Not Reported AQUIFLOW 61033 11 NNE 1 - 2 Miles Lower Site ID: 1863 Groundwater Flow: Not Reported Shallowest Water Table Depth: 2.66 Deepest Water Table Depth: 4.40 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 11/28/1995 AQUIFLOW 41857 12 East 1 - 2 Miles Lower Site ID: 1321 Groundwater Flow: NNE Shallowest Water Table Depth: 10.93 Deepest Water Table Depth: 15.50 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 11/21/1997 AQUIFLOW 41977 TC607170.1s Page A -9 GEOCHECK ® - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation 13 NE 1 - 2 Mlles Lower Site ID: 4928 Groundwater Flow: SE Shallowest Water Table Depth: 9.23 Deepest Water Table Depth: 12.65 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 10/23/1993 Database EDR ID Number AQUIFLOW 61091 14 NNW 1 - 2 Mlles Lower Site ID: 4136 Groundwater Flow: W Shallowest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Deepest Water Table Depth: Not Reported Average Water Table Depth: 10 Date: 11/10/1992 AQUIFLOW 61046 15 NW 1 - 2 Miles Lower Site ID: Not Reported Groundwater Flow: SW Shallowest Water Table Depth: 9.52 Deepest Water Table Depth: 14.10 Average Water Table Depth: Not Reported Date: 12/10/1990 AQUIFLOW 61191 TC607170.1s Page A -10 GEOCHECK ® - ,PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS AREA RADON INFORMATION Federal EPA Radon Zone for KING County: 3 Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. Zip Code: 98108 Number of sites tested: 2 Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCl/L % >20 pCi/L Living Area - 1st Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Living Area - 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement 0.200 pCi/L 100% TC607170.1s Page A -11 HYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHE HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR In 1999 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information System Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Amdt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the national Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey Information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil pattems in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202 - 260 -2805 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202 - 260 -2805 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: In November 1971 the United States Geological Survey (USGS) implemented a national water resource information tracking system. This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and /or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on more than 900,000 wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. TC607170.1s Page A -12 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STATE RECORDS Water Wells Source: Department of Transportation Telephone: 360 - 705 -7444 Group A well location points in Washington State. Kitsap County Water Wells In Washington Source: Public Utility District No. 1 of Kitsap County Telephone: 206- 779 -7656 RADON Area Radon Information: The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones: Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration TC607170.1s Page A -13 r • HISTORICAL RESEARCH DOCUMENTS' File No. 8039 -003 -0L -1150 FOLIO 6 PERMIT NO. 4-/1/7112.- DATE -ir'- ADDITION Seel r ct t pT �. • 4671( - �C ��� ,.' f. • Block Lol or�- Range �f/ Ti. Lot�_L Tract Address 911.7- 24-row` Ala1,A,ct /6� • F.. Own.r - — Architect Contractor 2•ning Condition of E•nrrlor Interior�C�Peundetlen, Floor Plant Good Accept. Po USE1le»',,C' 57111M ROOF CONSTRUCTION FLOOR FINISHES ❑TII.n Line nPonn. PLUMBING t( No. Stories 't —j'-- No. Stores EV. No. Rooms r • Basement UUnit No. Oflic•s S. Ft. No. Aparrtnts.E—1 1 nn. ❑ 2 rm. 03». 1 rm. ❑ S rm. 06 rm. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ) From• !/ M•ral.Pr•fob Ordinary Masonry Mill Construction Class A Rain. Conc. Situ. St••I and Conc. Struct. St••I, Frame Of QUALITY -TYP� Good Med, Cheap FOUNDATION Mud Sill L] Post Pier Conc. ❑ Brick Load H.t. 0 P.11n9 BASEMENT Full Sub-Basement Site Frame-Joist Mlll•D•ck R•In. Conc. GLB Steel Fr. M•tol Deck Trusses Wood r / St••I Fir ❑ Aeolis Oak ❑ 2.6TG_ —y Lino ❑ 3.6TG_ f/ Cement ❑ Lgtsvgt, T.rratto Cane. Asphalt The Vinyl ❑ TII. Both Floor Bath Wolin Tub Recites Drain Bds. Vanities L Dot. Built Dat• Add. Bull, b Unfinished ❑Remod.l•d Eff.cfve Ate Y.on Future Life Year D•p. 1!' Condom __ _ D. for Ob. ,b►9. eft yTdldl . • LED :A RS / No. P1.tur.s Tellers __LUrinols Tubs L•g. Of P.m. Basins / Dr. Fens, Sinks Washes Dry•rs Showers (tub) (atoll) H.W. Tanks Ldy.Trays t D.Woshers Disposals f' Sprinkler Sy.. HEATING P • Elec. XOil Gas H.W. 5t. H.A. B.Bd. _Suspend•d FHA _Pip•loss • A. Cond. _Wall Unit Comb. Unit Custom R•Iri9. Conv•ctor Heat Pump _Fir•ploce. YEAR ASSESSED VALUE Garag•OHo. Cars ' ,Curb ?G%+ a'K �7c — 1' LESS DEPRECIATION 1v/ Floors r . fn PI d ❑PI.Bd. F-� r : ASSESSED VAL.," No. Apartments XP Al/ 72,(1/ 4I S•rvic• Rooms DEPR. FULL VALUE EXTERIOR WALL CONST. '.""..Single ❑ Double Stud Walls Brick_ Pil.❑ Cans. -_ Pil.❑ Rein. Conc. Sk•l.tan Str. StI..From• _t so" 9r Pre.Fob M•tol 7" T;It.Up Filler Wall Curtain Wall Ica °i�e.�dN:,O.•.s• L f/ouh LW." Z' 37f'Csa,.e0 — 'Mon. Hydr. Doors -Auto Mon. JEscalators Stops_ Speed Cop y C.Hgt. GROUND FLOOR AREA P i1.64,7-41 2 yy Con c.Pil•s &Bins Conduit Trt3. Pil• Tinbr. Pwr. Wiring Paved Range Wiring Outlets _Dolphins Deck SB TOTAL FLOOR AREA /SA z,/ 3 Q L 5. 'good 7d/ - / - .Q(o/ INTERIOR WALLS& CEILING Stud Wood ✓Metal Plost•r ItryWall Acc.Til• CeIot.. C•il•d Plywood EXTERIOR FACING Solid . Block Siding Stucco Shakes Morbl•cr•t• Brick ❑ V•n••r Conc. ❑ Conc. BIk. Sound Proofed Laurin. Finished Unfinished �Poinr•d Varnished FLOOR CONSTRUCTION Joist ._ . O.C. "II _ Car Deck ✓ R.Conc. _ Elev. Steel GLB. or INSULATION E.t... Roof INTERIOR TRIM Partitions Floor ROOF COVERING BU..Up Comp. Metal Of Fir Birch Mah. Oak Metal Wood Metal Doors Wood —711.so1 Sash ,6telned Vomish Palnf•d Unfin. B 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 25 • 6 ADDITION r r r s�_V •Ewf, 1 �.ctiodr — 2 —TwIC h 11 ii „ Mock_ ck '1:r:ult or Lot -- — • US'fdfrf J f/" I Found.Hest ` gym. FLOOR FID18RIC8 No Strohm 4 No. States vo. Rooms Basement No. Offices Yo. AMrtmenta I rm. 2 rm. 1 3 rm. arm. 1 6rm. 1 6rm. IT Ft CIF 0ON1T&UCTION Frame J I yule El Double -Ordinary Amory min Construction Clo A Rein. Con. Stro. Steel and Con. _— I Tile ❑ Brick Con Q Rein. Con. Good vdChe.y- FOUBDATION Fir Oak Lino. Cement Tert.so RseooB Tar and Clonal • Bathe • i7. • Walls 1 8a oon 1 Sq Ft W.B. Lin. Ft r. Dd.. Sq.Ft ems u, 8Q. Ft Walla Lin. Ft . Dde. Or Or Kit's. Q Fl. a wall. Date Buil Effective Dep. for Cond OCCil 4J1,4 Yy17yv(Cfi'dd#fbA IBC* JUF' «i fiuiehd 0 Unfinished Remodeled Yen - Future Life y. for Ob Dey for FA Total No Fixtures Toilets Tab., Leg or Pen. Baeh., Pd. Sink Uriwl. Shemin (Tub) (81.1)) Laundry Trays H W.Tank F1. Drain 0 Bprink. Sya. No_Hda. inane Farness '? Gravity H. A. Air Cood., Fan Arcola 1 -Pip. Stem 2 -Pipe Bt. or Vapor Hot Water Oil Burner Coal 'Stoker 0 No. Can oon _ Room ... Rooms Punt Licit RLR7ATOR8 _ —I Pam.. kuto Man Freight Elec. Ilyd. Han.. _ .._ WALL CONSTR. Double • Stud Walls • Stud Wall Wall k With Pduters rtete Walls with Pdaa albs a. 8keL filer Walle d Web INTERIOR WILLS tud an aster *Plastered GA3 STATIONS —J Frame Metal -( C-, f S Useonty Mastered or Ceiid Floors azaViCE BUILDING Frame Petal Msemtry Plastered or Coiled GROUND FLOOR AREA TOTAL FLOOR ARRA oQ,f n8TWWto1 x7116 Fir ]false. 0 Oak Metal Shinano Stu rani Cast 8. •.. re Window. Stained Varnished Painted UnSni,bed Treated Pao and Timken 18 18 Untreated 'heated PBe only Annie Loath Need A ITIO�DDN7N � tletion�eL.Terp win. Blink Lot or Tat Lot ( Trent Fes Owner Condition of Exterior 1J8Z No Stake No Stores No Rooms Basement / No. Offices No. A rements Frame Lem 11 - Mill Construction - Rein. Concrete - No. Truaee Wood 0 Steil ROOFING MATERIAL 1 rm. U 2 rm. II 3 rm. 4 m 6rm. U 8rm. Or TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION Frame Single ❑ Double Ordinary Masonry Mill Construction Ines A Rein. Con. Steel n,4-Qon Tile Brick Con Rein. Con. Gnod_—Med. - Chem FOUNDATION Tar and Gravel Date Built ( 9 4-4- Effective Age Dep. for Cond Fir Msple Oak Yob' TAU Lino. 3•a6• TAO Cement Terrnuo Rsecolith Tile El Finished Tsars IorOb Dep for Es Kit's ❑ Fl. ❑ Walls 0 Unfinished ❑ ltamodoled Future Lilo Ware rLIIODto,VA /1fF No. Fixtures Toilets Tube, leg or Pem. Basins, Ped. Sink* Urinals Showers (Tub) (Stall) Laundry Trays 11 W. Tank Fl. Drale ❑ Sprink. Sys. No Nda bto.e E,Cetr?C WO, ,- Pipelese Furnace r./ g 4 T F. Gravity 11. A. Air Cond., Fan Suspended Gas, Hot Water Steam Heat Iiot Water Oil Burner Year j4( Assessed Valu. 1.Ba+cment Tt Carego ❑ No. Can Floors t... and Living Rooms Service Room OR WALL COMM. Untreated Tnatcd Pile only A vcrnao Lengtl, Paved hoists• Flea H d INTERIOR WALLS eons a tune Flex. Cable Conduit 1'u ur Winuo Range Wiring No. Outlets O. H. • GROUND FLOOR ARIA Single - Double •: Y Stud Walls 6• Stud Walls S 7s_" /S - al Pila.te= Walls Con. with Tile Walls Rem. Con Sket. dler Walls le Laminated ZITIMIOR FA Siding Slake Brick V TOTAL FLOOR ARL Joist Con. 0.0 ra B Mill Coetnsstloo Ibita Con. 9 t 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 17 18 19 Net Vase,' ADDITIO Fes Owner Condition d Exterior FF1I4 rntai oa MOOR ]►III= Fir Napo Oak Y :1FTAO Lim. • Y:IF TAO Cement Terrano Raaodith Tile Rain. Comm* No. Tram. Wood M Steel ROOTING MATERIAL Tar and Orevd Coh TYY; Or CONSTRUCTION Frame Single 0 Double Ordinary Masonry :till Construction Clew A Rein. Con. Stria Ste(el' �and Con. Tile i..-1 Crick Con. Rein. Con. Onod Jred_Cherp w'ir'e a- aJYeteerw SY. Fe coon SQ. Ft—.Walls Lin. FR_DG Ads Sri Ft Floors Se Ft —Walla Lin. Ft _Dr. Ede. y� Or Kttb. 0 FL Wails Date Buil L 0 Finished Unfinished Remodeled Effective Age Yeats Future Life Years Dep. for Cond Dep for Ob Dep fora Total Sr 6 Mil C] Sub - Basement Si Garage ❑ No. Cars Flans —I Mattered Living Rooms Sender Rooms - - t,L- No. Dater Tdle:- Tuba, Lg or rem. Baain, Ped. Sinks Ali Showers f ileb) (Stall) Ieundry Trays toe-- H W.Taak Fl. Drain 0 =ATM Stove Pied® Furnace Gravity Ii. A. Air Cond., Fen Arcola 1 -Pipe Stettin 2•I'ipe St. or Vapor Hot Water Oil Burner _J Coal Stoker WIRING C I dl! Knobs & Tube Flex Cable Conduit Power Wiring Rif Range Wiring tin Outicte Other B Totet Avowed. %due Sr. Fop. Bonding A. V !Ingle /r Y z 4' Stud Walls YzMStud Walla Brick Walla Prick With Pilasters Concrete Wells Con. With Pilaster, Tile Walls Rein. Con. Sid. Filter Walls Laminated Wills SSTERtoR rACIIfo DP MOE WALLS . OAS STATIONS _J Stud and Heater —_i Remo _ Lam. - ❑ Plastered _� Meld Ply Wood ��� 1 Masonry Ceded _J Plutered or Coiled Plaster Board I Floors Painted Stain 0 Varnish I Frame Kaleomine • —J Metal Whitewalls hitewwhed Masonry Unfinished ' —1 Plastered or Ceiled Floors O H. GROUND MOOR AREA SERVICE BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR A3SA INTwoi Till Fir Mah. Metal. Gist Con C Ta Bridg,._❑ mad caoetrrrtHoo Rdo. co. TAaeed Mier and Timbers . D Untreated Tteaed PBS cooly Artrsge Ieegtb Paved % Dep. Depress. Net Value , 61 61 o . o Q 17/ 4--.• J-2 19e. rp.v EWA 0 EU al; VG .;7.-7:7111f1 aCVTTYT E C. a _oV erg alT,:f. 1.17,TIT!' .00.1■•••••••■••■•••• a 17— ; 1 •• n .....7.6.111.11.47...■■•• . • ........ r1001-105 07 trrn. , sar,Eraq 2 ADDITION SECTION Ma-- TWP. 24 [ .,,NGE_ :.6 I� „_R/IC�T OR LOT NO. Tax Lot ^5 DESCRIPTION ' CODE NO. :RMIT NO. 3 ADDRESS -- PROPERTY 9426 Saet Marginal Way I . n T., p.l •�- .+ u. 2' 26 4 FEE OWNER 5 ARCHITECT RIG. COST - OWNER OR CONTRACT PURCHASER DATE FILE NO. PRICE MTGC: STAMP FLOOR PLAN REMARKS 30' Af 4.F ,. :F s' 7¢ECTION 1hilM•. 13 "r i • LAND CI.ASSIFICATION AND SEGREGATION /Q O � 1" V ;;: AERIAL ?Hot RTER MAP NOE ii' r.: -, l iT.•,•, .' "•1 • r , S . • " 69 "MAP I•∎•` Sh In of .Y�I sztxr f -4 .' _ • . r z cor Z. Grow D. `h' 3'D4" ;V 204..77 tos 1y 1a"E "Marg'1 tray th.S 23.40'59 ",E alg Bd Ely In 146.08' to pt of aryl t • : • ', ; = r ary 132.95= to •-tango t ad ory th_N i 2 0 4 "4 /c /32QOr Q • '1 • d NOIIVn -IvA O3SS3SSV NI 3St'32HDNI ' r 9SH3803a • 61 •.61 6! . • .. 6( , 6E, • 61 I 61 I • 61 I 61 A 61 1 / \ 1 \ / 6 6t • 61 i.. - 61 61 • 81 i 61 F� - t -6' ,4, - ,, ;J' f/>• -At-F of 6 ��2� -� of /c p of £' L • 4£9 rips! p O� vo_C/ r d 1' if 6 4/76 {i. St St }+ -wr+' - v :.� i1 ,,: -:., , /" ii° • p f iCf P v-T (! 6/ ..-.- . oa FJ F9 0..5% I.V7113Nl 711VIMD7a 71K71DNI 22222 010 NO.VI8 AB 3/VC 1Vlo1 ,30018 aNy1 •3V Y VIA 1` ON Milne H aNV1 arrwA 03683SSy AO O 003Z NOIIVn -IvA O3SS3SSV NI 3St'32HDNI ' r 9SH3803a • LIMITS ADDITION SE 1/4 SECTION DESCRIPTION TAX LOT 33 TWP. "24- N RANGE 4 • BLOCK LOT 5 SPLJIALUATION POR OF OLD RIn ED BEG ON MEAN SHORE LN OF RT BANK OF DUWAMISH'RIVER AT PT N WAY TH S 23 -40 -59 ARC OF SD CURVE 1fIc40. FT M E G SD ELY LN 146.08 FT TO PT OF CURVE TO RAO U 6.62 .95 FT TO TANGENT OF SD CURVE TH N 21 E ALG NWLY GN 1 0 BEG OWNER OR CONTRACT PURCHASE DATE FILE NUMBER PRICE EMARKS HOSPITAL JOHN 6. SHORETT JR FERRY BY - EASON k.'• .C.V.,) County 2 1 1 fit —47 Il'Raa= 113ranlj 12,070 7170 Metro 11 alu See TL 5 -1 0 - 27:3 I1 -- , //-- /s- 6,7 -673 k 19 DISTRICT: ROAD SCHOOL WATER FIRE 1 SEWER HOSPITAL AIRPORT FERRY BY - EASON k.'• .C.V.,) County 2 1 1 7170 7 70 Il'Raa= 113ranlj 12,070 7170 Metro 11 alu See TL 5 -1 0 - 27:3 I1 19 , 19 19 f` III ASSESSED VALUE YEAR ACRES TIMBER LAND BLDGS. - TOTAL DATE BY - EASON SEG. NO. 19 • 19 • • 7170 7 70 Il'Raa= 113ranlj 12,070 7170 .. MiiiiiMigiiii 11 alu See TL 5 -1 0 - 27:3 I1 19 , 19 19 f` III 19 i 19 19 '9 19 1D 19 • r 5 -' i APPENDIXD ' File No. 8039- 003-01 -1150 \I APOLLO GEOPHYSICS CORPORATION Engineering, Geology, Environmental, Construction at Mining Dave Cook GeoEngineers, Inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1420 Seattle, WA 98101 AGC File No.: 01.2021 Re: Dear Mr. Cook, UST Locate Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S Seattle, Washington Tuesday, May 15, 2001 This letter reports the results of geophysical exploration for potential Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) at the above referenced site. The site is located at the Museum of Flight — 9404 East Marginal Way South in Seattle, Washington. A two - person field crew from APOLLO GEOPHYSICS completed the geophysical field program on Friday, April 20, 2001. We investigated the parking lot area with an Electromagnetic (EM) instrument, which locates buried metal objects. We traversed the site with the EM instrument on approximate 5 -foot line spacings, which produced target areas for the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). We further investigated the target areas using GPR, which enabled us to identify the targets as potential USTs. underground utilities, or demolition debris. Ground Penetrating Radar established a relative depth, size and ground projection of the object (i.e. to determine if the object was indicative or was not indicative of a UST or utility). Small objects in the near surface, 1 to 2 feet. will respond the same as a larger object (UST) at depth. • A COST - EFFECTIVE WOMAN OWNED BUSINESS with PROFESSIONAL ASSURANCE • PO BOX 65169 • Seattle, Washington USA 98155 -9169 • FAX (425) 671 -0865 • Web Site www.apollogeophysics.com Seattle (206) 365 -3063 Spokane (509) 326 -2010 Portland (503) 234 -4001 Bellingham (360) 647 -8303 Seattle, Washington May 15, 2001 Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S AGC's File No.: 01.2021 UST Locate Page 2 RESULTS OF THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY We traversed the parking lot area with an EM instrument, which found a total of 15 target areas for further investigation with the GPR instrument. We completed several GPR traverses across each target area to evaluate their potential as a UST. The Ground Penetrating Radar confirmed the presence of 10 potential UST's in the parking lot area. We recommend these areas for further evaluation with direct exploration. Six of the potential UST's are located in the parking strip /sidewalk between the Museum driveway and Marginal Way. Four of these potential UST's are clustered around the walkway to the Museum extending from the sidewalk to the Museum driveway. The two remaining potential UST's were 40 to 50 feet North and South of the walkway. UST #10 was in the existing sidewalk area and UST #5 was in the grass near a hydrant North of the walkway. The approximate locations for all the potential UST's are shown on the Site Plan transmitted to your office the day after the completion of the field effort. All EM target areas and recommended direct exploration locations were marked in the field with environmentally degradable paint. Suspected pipes, demolition debris, etc., were not marked in the field. All potential UST signatures indicated the tanks should be within +/- 3 feet below ground surface. ELECTROMAGNETIC The electromagnetic, or EM device, transmits and receives an electromagnetic signal. The EM signal is transmitted through the ground, which in turn radiates a signal that is dependent on the ground conductivity and which is also received at the receiver. The two signals, the transmitted and ground response EM waves, are balanced for a zero response in the instrument. When the ground conditions change, for example, when the transmitted signal encounters buried metal, the balance or null point changes, and the instrument responds with an audible signal. Depending on the size of the metal object, the penetration is up to 10 feet in depth. The EM survey was limited in areas. where reinforcing steel was present in the,concrete or immediately adjacent to any above ground metal objects on the site. 0 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com Seattle, Washington May 15, 2001 Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S AGC's File No.: 01.2021 UST Locate Page 3 GROUND PENETRATING RADAR APOLLO GEOPHYSICS uses a PE1000 with either a 450 or 110 MHz antenna for shallow UST Locates. The radar antenna transmits an electromagnetic step -pulse at a frequency of 450/110 MHz at a selected stack rate of 32/64. When the signal encounters a change in electrical properties /permittivity, a portion of the signal energy is reflected back to the surface. The character of the reflection is used to define the source of the reflection. The reflected signal is received by the antenna, processed by a DSP radar processor with signal gain control and the raw data is recorded by the outboard 80486 computer with 16 MB RAM & 300 MB Hard Drive. The radar data is displayed by the computer on a 16.5 cm Color Active Matrix LCD VGA screen in real -time. The radar displays the data in real -time, which enables us to review the data in the field ' for on the spot evaluation. The recorded raw data, as recorded by the computer, is then later processed to remove unwanted peripheral effects by proprietary GPR software. circular UST will produce, in cross - section, a hyperbolic reflection. A traverse parallel A typical circu p Yl� ' to the centerline of the UST will show a horizontal (if there is no velocity or elevation change along the traverse) reflection, with a partial hyperbolic signature at both ends of the UST. The ' hyperbolic signature is the result of "seeing" the tank before the center of the antenna is over the tank. ' WARRANTY OF SERVICES Electromagnetic methods may define UST's constructed of non - ferrous metals, but not fiberglass or plastic materials. Ground Penetrating Radar may define fiberglass or plastic UST's or drums provided they fall within the exploration grid of the GPR. All geophysical information presented is based upon geophysical measurements made by ' generally accepted methods and field procedures and APOLLO GEOPHYSICS' interpretation of these data. The geophysical results are, therefore, interpretative in nature and are considered to be a reasonably accurate presentation of existing conditions within the limitations of the methods employed. Services performed by APOLLO GEOPHYSICS under this agreement are ' conducted in a manner consistent with, but no less than, that level of care skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. We cannot Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com '0 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper Seattle, Washington Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S UST Locate A'Iay 15, 2001 AGC 's File No.: 01.2021 Page 4 guarantee the accuracy or correctness of any interpretation, and we shall not be liable or responsible for any loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred or sustained by the Client resulting from any interpretation made by any of our officers, agents or employees. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. APOLLO GEOPHYSICS recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where geophysical or other explorations are made. The data interpretations and recommendations made by APOLLO GEOPHYSICS are based solely on the information available to them at the time of performance; and APOLLO GEOPHYSICS shall not be responsible for the interpretation, by others, of the information developed. We trust this will complete your requirements for this project and look forward to working with you on future projects. If you have any further questions or need further assistance, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, APOLL • EOP Y _ • "ORATION ORATION AN% 4.111111111 fr ANC Matthew C. Ringstad Project Manager C This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com APOLLO GEOPHYSICS CORPORATION Engineering, Geology, Environmental, Construction 8i Mining Dave Cook GeoEngineers, Inc. Plaza 600 Building 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1420 Seattle, WA 98101 AGC File No.: 01.2021 Re: Dear Mr. Cook, Tuesday, May 15,.2001 UST Locate Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S Seattle, Washington This letter reports the results of geophysical exploration for potential Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) at the above referenced site. The site is located at the Museum of Flight — 9404 East Marginal Way South in Seattle, Washington. A two - person field crew from APOLLO GEOPHYSICS completed the geophysical field program on Friday, April 20, 2001. We investigated the parking lot area with an Electromagnetic (EM) instrument, which locates buried metal objects. We traversed the site with the EM instrument on approximate 5 -foot line spacings, which produced target areas for the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). We further investigated the target areas using GPR, which enabled us to identify the targets as potential USTs, underground utilities, or demolition debris. Ground Penetrating Radar established a relative depth, size and ground projection of the object (i.e. to determine if the object was indicative or was not indicative of a UST or utility). Small objects in the near surface, 1 to 2 feet, will respond the same as a larger object (UST) at depth. • A COST- EFFECTIVE WOMAN OWNED BUSINESS with PROFESSIONAL ASSURANCE • PO BOX 65169 • Seattle, Washington USA 98155 -9169 • FAX (425) 671-0865 • Web Site www.apollogeophysics.com Seattle (206) 365-3063 Spokane (509) 326 -2010 Portland (503) 234 -4001 Bellingham (360) 647 -8303 Seattle, Washington May 15, 2001 Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S AGC's File No.: 01.2021 UST Locate Page 2 RESULTS OF THE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY We traversed the parking lot area with an EM instrument, which found a total of 15 target areas for further investigation with the GPR instrument. We completed several GPR traverses across each target area to evaluate their potential as a UST. The Ground Penetrating Radar confirmed the presence of 10 potential UST's in the parking lot area. We recommend these areas for further evaluation with direct exploration. Six of the potential UST's are located in the parking strip /sidewalk between the Museum driveway and Marginal Way. Four of these potential UST's are clustered around the walkway to the Museum extending from the sidewalk to the Museum driveway. The two remaining potential UST's were 40 to 50 feet North and South of the walkway. UST #10 was in the existing sidewalk area and UST #5 was in the grass near a hydrant North of the walkway. The approximate locations for all the potential UST's are shown on the Site Plan transmitted to your office the day after the completion of the field effort. All EM target areas and recommended direct exploration locations were marked in the field with environmentally degradable paint. Suspected pipes, demolition debris, etc., were not marked in the field. All potential UST signatures indicated the tanks should be within +/- 3 feet below ground surface. ELECTROMAGNETIC The electromagnetic, or EM device, transmits and receives an electromagnetic signal. The EM signal is transmitted through the ground, which in turn radiates a signal that is dependent on the ground conductivity and which is also received at the receiver. The two signals, the transmitted and ground response EM waves, are balanced for a zero response in the instrument. When the ground conditions change, for example, when the transmitted signal encounters buried metal, the balance or null point changes, and the instrument responds with an audible signal. Depending on the size of the metal object, the penetration is up to 10 feet in depth. The EM survey was limited in areas, where reinforcing steel was present in the concrete or immediately adjacent to any above ground metal objects on the site. 0 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com Seattle, Washington Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S UST Locate GROUND PENETRATING RADAR May 15, 2001 AGC's File No.: 01.2021 Page 3 APOLLO GEOPHYSICS uses a PE1000 with either a 450 or 110 MHz antenna for shallow UST Locates. The radar antenna transmits an electromagnetic step -pulse at a frequency of 450/110 MHz at a selected stack rate of 32/64. When the signal encounters a change in electrical properties /permittivity, a portion of the signal energy is reflected back to the surface. The character of the reflection is used to define the source of the reflection. The reflected signal is received by the antenna, processed by a DSP radar processor with signal gain control and the raw data is recorded by the outboard 80486 computer with 16 MB RAM & 300 MB Hard Drive. The radar data is displayed by the computer on a 16.5 cm Color Active Matrix LCD VGA screen in real -time. The radar displays the data in real -time, which enables us to review the data in the field for on the spot evaluation. The recorded raw data, as recorded by the computer, is then later processed to remove unwanted peripheral effects by proprietary GPR software. A typical circular UST will produce, in cross - section, a hyperbolic reflection. A traverse parallel to the centerline of the UST will show a horizontal (if there is no velocity or elevation change along the traverse) reflection, with a partial hyperbolic signature at both ends of the UST. The hyperbolic signature is the result of "seeing" the tank before the center of the antenna is over the tank. WARRANTY OF SERVICES Electromagnetic methods may define UST's constructed of non - ferrous metals, but not fiberglass or plastic materials. Ground Penetrating Radar may define fiberglass or plastic UST's or drums provided they fall within the exploration grid of the GPR. All geophysical information presented is based upon geophysical measurements made by generally accepted methods and field procedures and APOLLO GEOPHYSICS' interpretation of these data. The geophysical results are, therefore, interpretative in nature and are considered to be a reasonably accurate presentation of existing conditions within the limitations of the methods employed. Services performed by APOLLO GEOPHYSICS under this agreement are conducted in a manner consistent with, but no less than, that level of care skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. We cannot Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com 0 This Document is Printed on Recycled Paper Seattle, Washington May 15, 2001 Museum of Flight - 9404 East Marginal Way S AGC's File No.: 01.2021 UST Locate Page 4 guarantee the accuracy or correctness of any interpretation, and we shall not be liable or responsible for any loss, cost, damages or expenses incurred or sustained by the Client resulting from any interpretation made by any of our .officers, agents or employees. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. APOLLO GEOPHYSICS recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where geophysical or other explorations are made. The data interpretations and recommendations made by APOLLO GEOPHYSICS are based solely on the information available to them at the time of performance; and APOLLO GEOPHYSICS shall not be responsible for the interpretation, by others, of the information developed. We trust this will complete your requirements for this project and look forward to working with you on future projects. If you have any further questions or need further assistance, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, APOLLO GEOPHYSICS CORPORATION Matthew C. Rin Project Manager stad 0 This Document is. Printed on Recycled Paper Apollo Geophysics Corporation www.apollogeophysics.com APPENDIX E FIELD PROCEDURES DRILLING PROGRAM General Subsurface conditions at the site were explored by completing 13 soil borings using direct push drilling equipment. A scientist from our staff selected the exploration locations, examined and classified the soils encountered, and prepared a detailed log of each exploration. Soils encountered were visually classified in general accordance with ASTM D- 2488 -90, which is described in Figure F -1. Soil symbol descriptions are presented in Figure F -2. The boring logs are presented in Figures F -3 through F -15. Soil and ground water sampling procedures are described below. Drilling and Soil Sampling Subsurface conditions on the site were explored during this phase of study by drilling 13 soil borings (B -1 through B -13) on April 26, 2001. The borings were drilled in the northern and west - central portions of the site to depths ranging between approximately 12 to 20 feet below ground surface (bgs) using a direct push drill rig owned and operated by Environmental Services Network of Lacey, Washington. The sampling equipment was decontaminated before each sampling attempt with a Liquinox wash and a fresh water rinse. Continuous soil cores were obtained from the direct -push borings using a 1.5- inch - diameter sampler with acetate liner driven with a pneumatic hammer. Ground water samples were obtained from selected soil borings using temporary well screen, a peristaltic pump and new polyethylene tubing. Additionally, ground water samples were obtained from one existing site monitoring well (MW -X) using a peristaltic pump and new polyethylene tubing. The soil and• ground water samples were placed directly in laboratory- prepared containers. Samples were placed in an iced cooler and chain -of- custody procedures were observed during transport of the samples to the testing laboratory. Soil samples that were submitted for chemical analysis are denoted in our boring logs with "CA." Field Screening of Soil Samples A scientist from our staff field screened soil samples obtained from the borings. Field screening results are used as a general guideline to delineate areas of possible petroleum- and volatile organic compound - related contamination and are presented on the boring logs. In addition, screening results are used to aid in the selection of soil samples for chemical analysis: The screening methods used include (1) visual screening, (2) water sheen screening, and (3) headspace vapor screening. Visual screening consists of inspecting the soil for stains indicative of petroleum - related contamination. Visual screening is generally more effective when contamination is related to heavy petroleum hydrocarbons such as motor oil, or when hydrocarbon concentrations are high. Water sheen screening and headspace vapor screening are more sensitive methods that have been G e o En g i n e e r s E -1 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 effective in detecting contamination at concentrations less than regulatory cleanup levels. However, field screening results are site - specific. The effectiveness of field screening varies with temperature, moisture content, organic content, soil type and age of contaminant. The presence or absence of a sheen or headspace vapors does not necessarily indicate the presence or absence of petroleum hydrocarbons. Water sheen screening involves placing soil in water and observing the water surface for signs of sheen. Sheen classifications are as follows: No Sheen (NS) No visible sheen on water surface. Slight Sheen (SS) Light, colorless, dull sheen; spread is irregular, not rapid; sheen dissipates rapidly. Natural organic matter in the soil may produce a slight sheen. Moderate Sheen (MS) Light to heavy sheen; may have some color /iridescence; spread is irregular to flowing, may be rapid; few remaining areas of no sheen on water surface. Heavy Sheen (HS) Heavy sheen with color /iridescence; spread is rapid; entire water surface may be covered with sheen. Headspace vapor screening may identify volatile organic compounds and involves placing a soil sample in a plastic sample bag. Air is captured in the bag and the bag is shaken to expose the soil to the air trapped in the bag. The probe of a Microtip photoionization detector (PID) is inserted in the bag, and the PID measures the concentration of organic vapors (in ppm) present within the sample bag headspace. G e o En g i n e e r s E -2 File No. 8039-003-01-1150/062901 GEI 85 -85 Rev. 07/98 SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOL GROUP NAME COARSE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Retained on No. 200 Sieve GRAVEL More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Retained on No. 4 Sieve CLEAN GRAVEL GW WELL - GRADED GRAVEL, FINE TO COARSE GRAVEL GP POORLY- GRADED GRAVEL GRAVEL WITH FINES GM ' SILTY GRAVEL GC CLAYEY GRAVEL SAND More Than 50% of Coarse Fraction Passes No. 4 Sieve CLEAN SAND SW WELL - GRADED SAND, FINE TO COARSE SAND SP POORLY - GRADED SAND SAND WITH FINES SM SILTY SAND SC CLAYEY SAND FINE GRAINED SOILS More Than 50% Passes No. 200 Sieve SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit Less Than 50 INORGANIC ML SILT CL CLAY ORGANIC OL ORGANIC SILT, ORGANIC CLAY SILT AND CLAY Liquid Limit 50 or More INORGANIC MH SILT OF HIGH PLASTICITY, ELASTIC SILT CH CLAY OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT CLAY ORGANIC OH ORGANIC CLAY, ORGANIC SILT HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT PEAT NOTES: 1. Field classification is based on visual examination of soil in general accordance with ASTM D2488 -90. 2. Soil classification using laboratory tests is based on ASTM D2487 -90. 3. Descriptions of soil density or consistency are based on interpretation of blow count data, visual appearance of soils, and /or test data. SOIL MOISTURE MODIFIERS: Dry - Absence of moisture, dusty, dry to the touch Moist - Damp, but no visible water Wet - Visible free water or saturated, usually, soil is obtained from below water table \�% Geo e. Engineers SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FIGURE E -1 LABORATORY TESTS CA Chemical Analysis FIELD SCREENING TESTS: Headspace vapor concentration data given in parts per million Sheen classification system: NS SS MS HS NT No Visible Sheen Slight Sheen Moderate Sheen Heavy Sheen Not Tested BLOW COUNT /SAMPLE DATA: Blows required to drive a 2.4 -inch I.D. split - barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 300 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. Blows required to drive a 1.5 -inch I.D. (SPT) split - barrel sampler 12 inches or other indicated distances using a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches. "P" indicates sampler pushed with weight of hammer or against weight of drill rig. SOIL GRAPH: SM Soil Group Symbol (See Note 2) Distinct Contact Between Soil Strata Gradual or Approximate Location of Change Between Soil Strata Water Level Bottom of Boring 22 ® Location of relatively undisturbed sample 12 ® Location of disturbed sample 17 0 Location of sampling attempt with no recovery 10 ® Location of sample obtained in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test (ASTM D -1586) procedures 26 m Location of SPT sampling attempt with no recovery © Location of grab sample NOTES: 1. The reader must refer to the discussion in the report text, the Key to Boring Log Symbols and the exploration Togs for a proper understanding of subsurface conditions. 2. Soil classification system is summarized in Figure A -1. Geo�Engineers KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS FIGURE E -2 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 B Logged TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Eq u .p ment Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X -coordinate: Not Determined Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth Plunge (dei. (ft) 12.5 from vertical) -90 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined 1- w ? w 0 Z 2 o o a co rn E o o co E inn �' t E t, a o— N$ D Material Description > a c, v x c . Other Tests And Notes ~ w w z = a o 0 0 - - 5— - 10- - - 15— D 20— L C _ u 7 - 1 P, - 25-- i jNote: L 100 100 1 2 3 �; • . '' •• •; • : ' • SP -SM • . ' • . Brown tine to medium sand with silt and tine gravel (medium dense, moist) Becomes darker brown — — Becomes wet - - — _ Q _ _ — — - _ <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 SS SS SS SS SS NS CA CA - - —5 _ —10 - —15 —20 - _ —25 See Figure E -2 for explanation Boring completed at 12.5 feet bgs on 04/26/01 - Ground water was observed at 10.5 feet bgs during drilling — — of symbols Z o ��� GeoEngineers W NO W LOG OF BORING B -1 FIGURE E -s Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date 04/26/01 Drilled Logged TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push E Equipment merit Strata Probe 9 P Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X- coordinate: Not Determined Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 16 Plunge (deg. from vertical) -90 Elevation ft Not Measured () Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined LL ? FL o v z EU ri o o m a E n �' t a 0 — Material Description > E a w lo x c $ t Other Tests And Notes w u_ z z a o 0 0 _ 5— 10— - - 15— 1 - th M 0 - o 0 20— a occ - ai a' o of 8 8 -- 25 o oNote: m J 100 100 100 1 2 3 4 p� � SM Brown silty tine to medium sand with occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - - - — _ — 2 _ — _ <100 <100 <100 2,000 <100 <100 SS SS SS HS NS NS CA CA _ _ —5 - —10 - —15 - - - ^ 20 —25 '•• SP Dark brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and - occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - — Becomes wet - — See Figure E -2 for explanation - Bonng completed at 16 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 10.5 feet bgs during drilling _ - - - — — — of symbols FQ Z P GeoNOEn Engineers W ' W LOG OF BORING B -2 FIGURE E-4 Project J Job Number L Location Date Drilled 04/26/01 L By Contractor ESN Drilling Drell Direct -push E Equipment Strata Probe B Bill Sample H Hammer . X X- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 19.5 D Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: Not Determined % Recovery Sample No. Blow Count 1 G Graphic Log USCS Group Symbol Material Description A Headspace Vapor (PPm) Sheen Other Tests N O UI O 01 C 1 1 1 � � 1 1 100 1 1 • SP B Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - - <100 S SS CA 1 1 .� 1 1 1 f f t _T 0 0 Boring completed at 19.5 feet bgs on 04/26/01 — Project Museum of Flight Date Drilled 04/26/01 Logged By Job Number 8039 - 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data Drill Bit X- coordinate: Y- coordinate: Total Depth (ft) 19 Plunge (de;. from vertical) -90 w w LL f- 0 w 0 0 GEI ENVIRONMENTAL BORING LOG 8039003.GPJ GEI CORP.GDT 8/29/01 8039-003-01 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined 0. Z O C 0 N Z 7 N J OQ p y 0 2 U 0 +8 GU) a o a V ▪ T ge w m c.7 5— 100 1 10— 100 2 3 15— 100 4 20— 25— • • • SP Note: See Figure E -2 for exp Material Description Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) Becomes wet a a (0 yc Other Tests And Notes DEPTH IN FEET Boring completed at 19 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 13 feet bgs during drilling lanation of symbols - <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 400 <100 <100 SS NS SS SS SS MS HS SS NS CA CA — 5 — 10 — 15 —20 —25 Geotl En 'neers LOG OF BORING B-4 FIGURE E -6 • APPENDIX FIELD PROCEDURES (`f ■ r ) G_ e 6 E n g i-n e'e is ,i Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 Logged TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Direct -push Method Equipment Strata Probe Drill Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X- coordinate: Not Determined Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth Plunge (dei. (ft) 19 from vertical) -90 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined F- Li z w o d v d z °' a ,(, 0) c„ ° V o m a E Cl) `-' r E C.9 a 'o2 a t, N u) Material Description d .. a E i" m x c t U) Other Tests And Notes w LL 1- o_ 0 0 —5 —10 - —15 - —20 - '- —25 0 - - 5— 10— - - - 15— - 0 - - 20— 7 L I - 1. 1. 3 a - 25— 5 n J 100 100 1 2 3 Note: 21 See • :<+�• .. SP � CONCRETE SP •. SP -SM Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - — - - — — - 2 — <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 400 <100 NS NS SS SS SS SS MS NS CA Concrete Brown fine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional - gravel (medium dense, moist) Brown fine to medium sand with silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) — ML Gray sandy silt with occasional gravel (soft, wet) - Figure E -2 for explanation - Boring completed at 19 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 15.5 feet bgs during — — drilling - - - - - — of symbols Z P z Geo40Engineers W LOG OF BORING B -5 FIGURE E -7 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date 04/26/01 Drilled Bogged TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment merit Strata Probe �1 P Drill Bit Sample Split Spoon S Method Hammer Data X- coordinate: Not Determined . Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 1 S Plunge (deg. from vertical) -90 Elevation ft Not Measured ( ) Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined t- W im I- w 0 > W ae O a ki N a' o m n O r E 0 d — N 0 Material Description 23 a- m a i iu r N Other Tests And Notes w w u- = a w 0 - —5 —10 - —15 - - - —20 - --25 0 5— _ 10— r 15— c - o 0 20— o a O - Ui W M 25— o oNote: CO J Q 100 100 1 2 �.: See ;::'. SP Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) _ — — - - — — _ _ Becomes wet — — <100 <100 1,200 1,000 <100 _ SS SS HS HS NS CA CA Figure E -2 for explanation Boring completed at 18 feet bgs on 04 /26/01 _ Ground water was observed at 12 feet bgs during drilling - — — _ of symbols W z illy W Geo OEn Engineers W 0 LOG OF BORING B -6 FIGURE E -8 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 04/26/01 Lo By Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Eq Strata Probe Drill Method Direct -push ui ment P Bit Sample Hammer X- coordinate: Not Determined Method Split Spoon Data Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 18 Elevation Not Measured Datum: Not Determined Plunge (de¢: from vertical) -90 (ft) System: Not Determined I.- t w ul to w u_ �' " o z c c d �' c o o > c Other Tests u_ F w O * E. N o m N a o = Material Description a Q. co 1O = v Notes 2 W a. O 0 0 SY Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) _ - 5— — — —5 - - <100 SS 10— 100 1 <100 SS —10 2 p� 2 - <100 <100 SS MS CA - Becomes wet 15— — — -15 - 100 3 - - <100 NS n _ - n - V Boring completed at 18 feet bgs on 04/26/01 - Ground water was observed at 14 feet bgs during drilling - - � 20— — — —20 — J ) u _ L L 3 — — — 25— •• — x-25 7 ENote: See Figure E -2 for explanation of symbols n J 1 p LOG OF BORING B -7 z Geo OEngineers FIGURE E -9 L ' Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039 - 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled O cc 0 a 0 0 U� w 0 n. n. 0 0 z z i 0 04/26/01 Logged By TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X- coordinate: Y- coordinate: Not Determined Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 18 Plunge (dei. from vertical) -90 1- w w LL o. z o. w 0 0 0 cc ae 0 z cu E rn Blow Count Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: Not Determined Not Determined a N §; 2 — a g 0S w g 010 Material Description Other Tests And Notes 5— 10— 100 1 15— 100 2 20— 25-- SP Note: See Figure E -2 for exp Brown fine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense. moist) Becomes wet Boring completed at 18 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 13 feet bgs during drilling lanation of symbols Q _ <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 SS SS SS SS SS SS CA 0 DEPTH IN FEET — 5 — 10 — 15 — 20 —25 Geo,j Engineers LOG OF BORING B -8 FIGURE E -10 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 04/26/01 Lo By Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Equipment Strata Probe Bill Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X- coordinate: Not Determined • Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 18 Plunge (deg. from vertical) -90 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined 1- W LL ? w o > v > 0 Cc' o 0 °' a co C o o m ,, E cn co 't E 0 a 2— = Material Description > §. a o x c Other Tests And Notes 1- iu u. a w 0 0 5— - 10— 15— - 6 o - 20— J D 7 - L L 9 - 3 D - 25-- n J 100 100 100 1 2 3 Note: p� DI See ': :.;• SP E -2 for explanation Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) — — Becomes wet — - — - — 2 - — - - — - - - - — <100 <100 . <100 <100 SS SS SS SS CA _ —5 —10 - —15 - - - —20 - —25 Figure Boring completed at 18 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 12 feet bgs during drilling — - - - — of symbols E go Y Geo O En 'neers W w LOG OF BORING B -9 FIGURE E -11 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039- 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 04/26/01 Lo By Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X- coordinate: Not Determined Y- coordinate: Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 20 Plunge (deg. from vertical) -90 Elevation (ft) Not Measured _ Datum: Not Determined _System: Not Determined 1- LL z o v o- d' Z;„ a co C o 0 E y g t E 0 a o— Material Description S. a s a , �' Other Tests And Notes w Z = a o 0 0 5— - 10— 15— i- D 20— e u - 1 1. L 7 4 1 _ B 25— i 100 100 1 2 Note: Z See SP Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) - — — _ - — — - — — - Q - Becomes wet - — <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 SS SS SS SS SS NS CA —5 —10 —15 _ - —20 - x-25 Figure E -2 for explanation Boring completed at 20 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 16.5 feet bgs during - - drilling _ - _ - — of symbols z 2 Geo NO Engineers W o LOG OF BORING B -10 FIGURE E -12 Project Museum of Flight Job Ntunbcr 8039 - 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 Drill Method Direct -push Logged By TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Equipment Strata Probe Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data Drill Bit X- coordinate: Y- coordinate: Total Depth (ft) 12 Plunpte (del. from vertical) -90 r w w LL Z a w 0 0 GEI ENVIRONMENTAL BORING LOG 8039003.GPJ GEI_CORP.GDT 6/29/01 8039-003-01 Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined Not Determined n Z O C 7 m Z 7 w J 2 a,° g 0— $ n a r 0 cc i o U) a U ae u) m (0 D U 5— 10— 15— 20— 100 1 100 2 25— SI) Note: See Figure E -2 for exp Material Description Brown tine to medium sand with trace silt and occasional gravel (medium dense, moist) Other Tests And Notes Boring completed at 12 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 11 feet bgs during drilling lanation of symbols <100 <100 <100 NS NS NS CA DEPTH IN FEET 0 -5 —10 —15 —20 ■-25 Geo%` Engineers LOG OF BORING B -11 FIGURE E -13 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039 - 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 Logged By TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data 3.GPJ GEI C Total Depth (ft) 13 Plunge (dee. from vertical) -90 DEPTH IN FEET 0 0 d z E 0) c 0 n E 0) S' J 0 Elevation (ft) Not Measured X- coordinate: Not Determined Y- coordinate: Not Determined Datum: Not Determined System: Not Determined Material Description L N Other Tests And Notes 100 10— 15— 20— 25^ ML Brown silt with tine sand (soft, moist) Becomes wet Boring completed at 13 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 11 feet bgs during drilling Note: See Figure E -2 for explanation of symbols <100 NS <100 NS <100 NS <100 NS CA 0 DEPTH IN FEET ^10 —15 —20 ^25 GeoEngineers LOG OF BORING B -12 FIGURE E -14 Project Museum of Flight Job Number 8039 - 003 -01 Location Seattle, Washington Date Drilled 04/26/01 Logged By TNO Contractor ESN Drilling Drill Method Direct -push Equipment Strata Probe Drill Bit Sample Method Split Spoon Hammer Data X -coordinate: Y- coordinate: Not Determined Not Determined Total Depth (ft) 13 Plunge (deg. from vertical) -9C w DEPTH IN F 0 0 0 z N G E 0) 0 in n E m U Elevation (ft) Not Measured Datum: System: Not Determined Not Determined Material Description Other Tests And Notes 100 100 10— 15— 20— 25— 2 SM ML Brown silty fine to medium sand and tine gravel (medium dense, moist) Brown silt with tine sand (soft moist) Boring completed at 13 feet bgs on 04/26/01 Ground water was observed at 10 feet bgs during drilling Note: See Figure E -2 for explanation of symbols <100 NS <100 NS <100 NS <100 NS <100 NS CA DEPTH IN FEET —10 —15 —20 —25 Geo Engineers LOG OF BORING 8-13 FIGURE E -15 rt CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM I APPENDIX F CHEMICAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM SAM PLES Chain -of- custody procedures, were followed during the transport of the field samples to the accredited analytical laboratory. The samples were held in cold storage pending extraction and/or analysis. The analytical results and quality control records are included in this appendix. ANALYTICAL DATA REVIEW The laboratory maintains an internal quality assurance program as documented in its laboratory quality assurance manual. The laboratory uses a combination of blanks, surrogate recoveries, duplicates, matrix spike recoveries, matrix spike duplicate recoveries, blank spike recoveries and blank spike duplicate recoveries to evaluate the analytical results. The laboratory also uses data quality goals for individual chemicals or groups of chemicals based on the long- term performance of the test methods. The data quality goals were included in the laboratory reports. The laboratory compared each group of samples with the existing data quality goals and noted any exceptions in the laboratory report. Any data quality exceptions documented by the accredited laboratory were reviewed by GeoEngineers and are addressed in the data quality exception section of this appendix. DATA QUALITY EXCEPTION SUMMARY No significant data quality exceptions were noted in the laboratory report or during our review. Based on the data quality review, it is our opinion that the analytical data are of acceptable quality for their intended use in this report. G e o En g i n e e r s F -1 File No. 8039- 003 -01- 1150/062901 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. NAY 11 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B -3 4/26/01 1050. 5/4/01 104118 1 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH -OIL RANGE TPH - DIESEL RANGE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TR ICH LOROFLUOROM ETHAN E 1,1- DICHLOROETHENE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE 1,1- DICHLOROETHANE CIS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE 2,2- DICHLOROPROPANE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1- TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1- DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2- DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE 1,2- DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NWTPH -GX 12000 UG /L EPA -8021 120 UG /L EPA -8021 ND(<50) UG /L EPA -8021 230 UG /L EPA -8021 890 UG /L NWTPH -DX ND UG /L NWTPH -DX ND UG /L EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L Page 1 ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL... DATE BY 5/1/01 LAH 5 UG /L 40 UG /L 30 UG /L 20 UG /L 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 KAS 5/1/01 KAS 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 DATE: 5/4/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: 1 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B -3 4/26/01 1050 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TRANS- 1,3- DICHLOROPROPEN E CIS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2- TRICHLOROETHANE 1,3- DICHLOROPROPANE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2- DIBROMOETHANE CHLOROBENZENE BROMOFORM 1,1,2,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROPROPANE BROMOBENZENE 2- CHLOROTOLUENE 4- CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DIBROMO 3- CHLOROPROPANE 1,2,4 - TRICHLOROBENZENE HEXACHLOR01,3- BUTADIENE 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROBENZENE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS *• EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<50) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /L EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /L ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL "' DATE BY 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL 5/2/01 RAL NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY LIGHTLY WEATHERED GASOLINE Page 2 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 es CO ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC DATE: 5/4/01 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 CCIL JOB #: 104118 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CCIL SAMPLE #: 1 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B -3 4/26/01 1050 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS METHOD RESULTS. UNITS" LEVEL * ** DATE BY "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 2500 UG /L DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 250 UG,L LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 500 UG /L " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY DOCUMENT SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISIONS BASED ON ANALYTICAL DATA APPROVED BY: \.'1r/ Page 3 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 1 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B -6 4/26/01 1330 5/4/01 104118 2 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE ACTION METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** LEVEL * ** NWTPH -GX 24000 UG /L EPA -8021 170 UG /L EPA -8021 320 UG /L EPA -8021 1100 UG /L EPA -8021 4400 UG /L NVVTPH-DX ND UG /L NWTPH -DX ND UG /L 5 UG /L 40 UG /L 30 UG /L 20 UG /L ANALYSIS ANALYSIS DATE BY 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 5/1/01 KAS 5/1/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY LIGHTLY WEATHERED GASOLINE • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT I5 GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 2500 UG /L DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 250 UG /L LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 500 UG /L " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS "' ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: q•.' Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 las CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: MW -X 4/26/01 1710 5/4/01 104118 3 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX ND UG /L EPA -8021 ND(<1) UG /L EPA -8021 ND(<1) UG /L EPA -8021 ND( <1) UG /L EPA -8021 ND( <3) UG /L NWTPH -DX ND UG /L NWTPH -DX ND UG /L ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 4/30/01 LAH 5 UG /L 40 UG /L 30 UG /L 20 UG /L 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 4/30/01 LAH 5/1/01 KAS 5/1/01 KAS • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 UG /L DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 250 UG /L LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 500 UG /L ' • UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: C14- Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: 66 -11.5 4/26/01 1315 5/4/01 104118 4 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.4) EPA -8021 ND(<0.4) EPA -8021 ND( <0.4) EPA -8021 ND(<1.2) NWTPH -DX 750 NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG MG /KG MG /KG MG /KG MG /KG MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/2/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY DIESEL 1 RANGE PRODUCT OR EXTREMELY WEATHERED GASOLINE "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING UMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOUNE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 250 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING UMIT IS 50 MG /KG " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ' • ` ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDEUNES ONLY. APPROVED BY: Page 1 i 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B6 -17.0 4/26/01 1330 5/4/01 104118 5 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/1/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS ' "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BEUSED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: Page 1 1` 2- 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 IPS CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B7 -13.5 4/26/01 1430 5/4/01 104118 6 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH-VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH- DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX 51 MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/1/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY HIGHLY WEATHERED GASOLINE "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT I5 GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOUNE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LOBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG • UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS •• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDEUNES ONLY. APPROVED BY: 'l Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 ■ CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B8 -12.5 4/26/01 1445 5/4/01 104118 7 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/1/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/1/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 25 MG /KG LOBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG ' • UNITS FOR ALL NON UQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/4/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: 8 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B9 -11.5 4/26/01 1520 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG BENZENE EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG TOLUENE EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG ETHYLBENZENE EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG XYLENES EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG TPH - DIESEL RANGE NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG TPH -OIL RANGE NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/1/01 LAH .5MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 40MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/1/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS •" ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. 1 APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ®ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B10 -11.5 4/26/01 1545 5/4/01 104118 9 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.3) MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/2/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. r ),/ APPROVED BY: ` '�' Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001-01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B11 -7.5 4/26/01 1605 5/4/01 104118 10 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NWTPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NVVTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL*** DATE BY 5/2/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING UMIT 15 GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 25 MG /KG LOBE OIL RANGE REPORTING UMIT IS 50 MG /KG •` UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS •'• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. I APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 En IT, CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B12 -10.5 4/26/01 1645 5/4/01 104118 11 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NV TPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL*" DATE BY 5/2/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 KAS 5/2/01 KAS ' "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ' " ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: ∎.' Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 ccI ®ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: 613 -8.0 4/26/01 1705 5/4/01 104118 12 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NWTPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL *" DATE BY 5/2/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/2/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS ' "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT I5 GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ••• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: C111/ Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC DATE: 5/4/01 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 CCIL JOB #: 104118 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CCIL SAMPLE #: 13 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B1 -3.0 4/26/01 945 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" LEVEL••' DATE BY NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG .5MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG 40MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOUNE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING UMIT IS 50 MG /KG • • UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ••• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDEUNES ONLY. APPROVED BY: C Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9039 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B1 -10 4/26/01 950 5/4/01 104118 14 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS' UNITS" NWTPH -GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.3) MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL." DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LOBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG • • UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS •`• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOU:D BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. �I1I�APPROVED BY: �I J Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF. ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B2 -10 4/26/01 1020 5/4/01 104118 15 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX 3200 MG /KG EPA -8021 1.3 MG /KG EPA -8021 7.5 MG /KG EPA -8021 13 MG /KG EPA -8021 9.1 MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG ACTION LEVEL * ** .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG ANALYSIS ANALYSIS DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY WEATHERED GASOLINE "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 500 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. I / APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B2 -14.0 4/26/01 1030 5/4/01 104118 16 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL "' DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS • NO INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG •• UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ••• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. ,V. APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC DATE: 5/8/01 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 CCIL JOB #: 104118 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CCIL SAMPLE #: 17 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039-001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B3 -11.5 4/26/01 1045 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS' UNITS" NWTPH-GX 6200 MG /KG EPA -8021 14 MG /KG EPA -8021 9.7 MG /KG EPA -8021 26 MG /KG EPA -8021 33 MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG CHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG VINYL CHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG BROMOMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG CHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,1- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG METHYLENE CHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG TRANS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG CIS-1,2- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 2,2- DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG BROMOCHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG CHLOROFORM EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,1- DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG CARBON TETRACHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,2- DICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG TRICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,2- DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG DIBROMOMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG BROMODICHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG TRANS- 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG CIS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG Page 1 ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL... DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 40MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: 17 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B3 -11.5 4/26/01 1045 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE METHOD RESULTS' UNITS" 1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG TETRACHLOROETHYLENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG/KG 1,2- DIBROMOETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG CHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG BROMOFORM EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG. 1,1,2,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,2,3- TRICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG BROMOBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 2- CHLOROTOLUENE . EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 4- CHLOROTOLUENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,2- DIBROMO 3- CHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND(<2500) UG /KG 1,2,4 - TRICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<500) UG /KG HEXACHLOR01,3- BUTADIENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <500) UG /KG LEAD EPA -6010 ND(<8) MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL "* DATE BY 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 5/7/01 LMH NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY LIGHTLY WEATHERED GASOLINE • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 500 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG TUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG •• UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: Page 2 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 =2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/4/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: 18 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B3 -19 4/26/01 1100 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS' UNITS" NWTPH-GX 9 MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.3) MG /KG NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL." DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 40MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY WEATHERED GASOLINE • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 DATA RESULTS 1 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B4 -7.5 4/26/01 1135 5/4/01 104118 19 4/27/01 C142 ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH-GX ND MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.3) MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/4/01 KAS 5/4/01 KAS • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 5 MG/KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG TUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG •' UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS " • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: (I+ Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 3562600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B4 -11.5 4/26/01 1145 5/4/01 104118 20 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE BENZENE TOLUENE ETHYLBENZENE XYLENES TPH - DIESEL RANGE TPH -OIL RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS" NWTPH -GX 280 MG /KG EPA -8021 ND( <0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG EPA -8021 1.6 MG /KG EPA -8021 9.0 MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL"" DATE BY 5/4/01 LAH .5MG /KG 40MG /KG 20MG /KG 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAH 5/3/01 LAN 5/3/01 KAS 5/3/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY WEATHERED GASOLINE • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 50 MG /KG UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ' ' • ALTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA I5 USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: C -)k Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 Es CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 DATE: 5/4/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: 21 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: B5 -15 4/26/01 1230 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE TPH- VOLATILE RANGE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** NWTPH -GX 40 MG /KG BENZENE EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG TOLUENE EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG ETHYLBENZENE EPA -8021 ND(<0.1) MG /KG XYLENES EPA -8021 0.4 MG /KG TPH - DIESEL RANGE NWTPH-DX ND MG /KG TPH -OIL RANGE NWTPH -DX ND MG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL ••• DATE BY 5/3/01 LAH .5MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 40MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 20MG /KG 5/3/01 LAH 5/4/01 KAS 5/4/01 KAS NOTE: CHROMATOGRAM INDICATES SAMPLE CONTAINS PRODUCT WHICH IS LIKELY WEATHERED GASOLINE "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE ANALYZED FOR BUT NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES OR AS FOLLOWS: GASOLINE(VOLATILE RANGE) REPORTING LIMIT I5 5 MG /KG DIESEL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT IS 25 MG /KG LUBE OIL RANGE REPORTING LIMIT I5 50 MG /KG UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ••• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. APPROVED BY: CY /1/ Page 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS CCIL SAMPLE ID SURROGATE RECOVERY ANALYTE SUR ID RECV 104118 -01 NWTPH-GX TFT 115 104118 -01 EPA -8021 TFT 104 104118 -01 NWTPH -DX C25 98 104118 -01 EPA -8260A 1,2- DCE -d4 105 104118 -01 EPA -8260A 4 -BFB 105 104118 -02 NWTPH -GX TFT 123 104118 -02 EPA -8021 TFT 113 104118 -02 NWTPH-DX C25 104 104118 -03 NWTPH -GX TFT 104 104118 -03 EPA -8021 TFT 102 104118 -03 NWTPH -DX C25 90 104118 -04 NWTPH -GX TFT 83 104118 -04 EPA -8021 TFT 74 104118 -04 NWTPH-DX C25 110 104118-05 NWTPH -GX TFT 84 104118 -05 EPA -8021 TFT 85 104118 -05 NWTPH-DX C25 104 104118 -06 NWTPH-GX TFT 85 104118 -06 EPA -8021 TFT 85 104118-06 NWTPH-DX C25 116 104118 -07 NWTPH-GX TFT 89 104118 -07 EPA -8021 TFT 89 104118 -07 NWTPH-DX C25 120 Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS Page 2 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 rn 9 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS 104118 -16 NWTPH-GX TFT 82 104118 -16 EPA -8021 TFT 83 104118-16 NWTPH -DX C25 96 104118 -17 NWTPH-GX TFT 104118 -17 EPA -8021 TFT * 104118 -17 NWTPH -DX C25 122 104118 -17 EPA -8260A 1,2- DCE -d4 78 104118 -17 EPA -8260A 4 -BFB 141 ** 104118 -18 NWTPH -GX TFT 78 104118-18 EPA -8021 TFT 84 104118 -18 NWTPH-DX C25 104 104118 -19 NWTPH-GX TFT 90 104118 -19 EPA -8021 TFT 89 104118 -19 NWTPH-DX C25 87 104118 -20 NWTPH -GX TFT * 104118 -20 EPA -8021 TFT 98 104118 -20 NWTPH -DX C25 92 104118-21 NWTPH-GX TFT 136 104118 -21 EPA -8021 TFT 84. 104118 -21 NWTPH-DX C25 94 Page 3 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS METHOD NWTPH -GX EPA- 8021(BENZENE) EPA- 8021(TOLUENE) EPA- 8021(ETHYLBENZ) EPA-8021(XYLENE) NWTPH-GX) EPA- 8021(BENZENE) EPA- 8021(TOLUENE) EPA- 8021(ETHYLBENZ) EPA- 8021(XYLENE) NWTPH-DX (DSL) NWTPH-DX (OIL) NWTPH -DX (DSL) NWTPH-DX (OIL) NWTPH -DX (DSL) NWTPH-DX (OIL) EPA- 7421(PB) EPA -8260A BLANK AND DUPLICATE RESULTS BLK RESULT ASSOC SMPLS ND(<50) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <1) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <1) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <1) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <3) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <5) 104118 -04 TO 21 ND(<0.1) 104118 -04 TO 21 ND( <0.1) 104118 -04 TO 21 ND( <0.1) 104118 -04 TO 21 ND(<0.3) 104118 -04 TO 21 ND( <250) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <500) 104118 -01 TO 03 ND( <25) 104118 -04 TO 11 ND( <50) 104118 -04 TO 11 ND(<25) 104118 -12 TO 21 ND(<50) 104118 -12 TO 21 ND( <1) 104118 -17 SEE BLANK REPORTS Page 4 DUP RESULT ORIG RESULT %RDP ASSOC SMPLS 110 150 ND( <1) ND( <1) ND(<1) ND( <1) ND( <1) ND( <1) ND(<3) ND( <3) ND(<5) ND( <5) ND( <0.1) ND(<0.1) ND(<0.1) ND(<0.1) ND(<0.1) ND( <0.1) ND(<0.3) ND(<0.3) ND(<250) ND(<250) ND( <500) ND(<500) 170 170 730 780 ND(<25) ND(<25) ND( <50) ND( <50) ND( <1) ND( <1) 3 7 * * ** SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME SAME 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 L101 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/8/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS METHOD. SPIKE ID SPIKE/ SPIKE DUPLICATE RESULTS ASSOCIATED % SPIKE % SPIKE DUP SAMPLES RECOVERY RECOVERY REL % DIFF EPA -8021 BENZENE 104118 -01 TO 03 99 N/A N/A EPA -8021 TOLUENE 104118 -01 TO 03 100 N/A N/A EPA -8021 ETHYLBENZENE 104118 -01 TO 03 97 N/A N/A EPA -8021 XYLENE 104118 -01 TO 03 97 N/A N/A EPA -8021 BENZENE 104118 -04 TO 15 107 N/A N/A EPA -8021 TOLUENE 104118 -04 TO 15 105 N/A N/A EPA -8021 ETHYLBENZENE 104118 -04 TO 15 105 N/A N/A EPA -8021 XYLENE 104118 -04 TO 15 104 N/A N/A EPA -8021 BENZENE 104118 -16 TO 21 93 N/A N/A EPA -8021 TOLUENE 104118 -16 TO 21 95 N/A N/A EPA -8021 ETHYLBENZENE 104118 -16 TO 21 93 N/A N/A EPA -8021 XYLENE 104118 -16 TO 21 95 N/A N/A EPA -8260A 1,1 DICHLOROETHENE 104118 -01 69 68 1 EPA -8260A TRICHLOROETHENE 104118 -01 86 93 8 EPA -8260A CHLOROBENZENE 104118-01 99 99 0 EPA -8260A 1,1 DICHLOROETHENE 104118 -17 39 * ** 40 * ** 2 EPA -8260A TRICHLOROETHENE 104118 -17 71 72 1 EPA -8260A CHLOROBENZENE 104118-17 80 83 4 EPA- 7421(PB) LEAD 104118 -17 101 N/A N/A * SURROGATE DILUTED OUT OF CALIBRATION RANGE '* SURROGATE OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS OF 74- 121% DUE TO MATRIX INTEREFERENCE ** SPIKE RECOVERY OUTSIDE OF CONTROL LIMITS OF 59 -172% * * ** %RPD NOT REPORTED FOR VALUES <X5 THE REPORTING LIMIT 1'. APPROVED BY: Page 5 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK DATE: 5/4/01 CCIL JOB #: 104118 CCIL SAMPLE #: BLK DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK FOR EPA -8260A SAMPLE 01 DATA RESULTS ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS ANALYTE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** LEVEL * ** DATE BY DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL VINYL CHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL BROMOMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL METHYLENE CHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL TRANS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1- DICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CIS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 2,2- DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL BROMOCHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CHLOROFORM EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1,1 - TRICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1- DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2- DICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL TRICHLOROETHENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2- DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL DIBROMOMETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL BROMODICHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL TRANS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CIS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1,2 - TRICHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,3- DICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL TETRACHLOROETHYLENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2- DIBROMOETHANE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL CHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL BROMOFORM EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,1,2,2 - TETRACHLOROETHANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 ■ CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC DATE: 5/4/01 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 CCIL JOB #: 104118 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CCIL SAMPLE #: BLK DATE RECEIVED: 4/27/01 WDOE ACCREDITATION #: C142 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) CLIENT SAMPLE ID: METHOD BLANK FOR EPA -8260A SAMPLE 01 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY BROMOBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 2- CHLOROTOLUENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 4- CHLOROTOLUENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2- DIBROMO 3- CHLOROPROPANE EPA -8260A ND( <25) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2,4 - TRICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL HEXACHLOR01,3- BUTADIENE EPA -8260A ND( <5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROBENZENE EPA -8260A ND(<5) UG /L 5/2/01 RAL • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES ' " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS • • ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY DOCUMENT SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISIONS BASED ON ANALYTICAL DATA APPROVED BY: Page 2 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9059 is ■ CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: CLIENT SAMPLE ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) METHOD BLANK FOR EPA -8260A SAMPLE 17 5/4/01 104118 BLK 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLOROMETHANE VINYL CHLORIDE BROMOMETHANE CHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 1,1- DICHLOROETHENE METHYLENE CHLORIDE TRANS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE 1,1- DICHLOROETHANE CIS -1,2- DICHLOROETHENE 2,2- DICHLOROPROPANE BROMOCHLOROMETHANE CHLOROFORM 1,1,1- TRICHLOROETHANE 1,1- DICHLOROPROPENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 1,2- DICHLOROETHANE TRICHLOROETHENE 1,2- DICHLOROPROPANE DIBROMOMETHANE BROMODICHLOROMETHANE TRANS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE CIS -1,3- DICHLOROPROPENE 1,1,2- TRICHLOROETHANE 1,3- DICHLOROPROPANE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE 1,2- DIBROMOETHANE CHLOROBENZENE BROMOFORM 1,1, 2,2- TETRACHLOROETHANE 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROPROPANE BROMOBENZENE 2- CHLOROTOLUENE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( < 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG, EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( < 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( < 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( < 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 4/30/01 RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL RAL Page 1 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292-9059 FM CCI ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC. CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS CLIENT: GEOENGINEERS, INC 600 STEWART ST., SUITE 1420 SEATTLE, WA 98101 CLIENT CONTACT: DAVE COOK CLIENT PROJECT ID: CLIENT SAMPLE ID: DATE: CCIL JOB #: CCIL SAMPLE #: DATE RECEIVED: WDOE ACCREDITATION #: 8039 - 001 -01 (MUSEUM OF FLIGHT) METHOD BLANK FOR EPA -8260A SAMPLE 17 5/4/01 104118 BLK 4/27/01 C142 DATA RESULTS ANALYTE 4- CHLOROTOLUENE 1,3 DICHLOROBENZENE 1,4- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE 1,2- DIBROMO 3- CHLOROPROPANE 1,2,4 - TRICHLOROBENZENE HEXACHLOR01,3- BUTADIENE 1,2,3 - TRICHLOROBENZENE METHOD RESULTS* UNITS ** EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND( <50) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(<10) UG /KG EPA -8260A ND(< 10) UG /KG ACTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LEVEL * ** DATE BY • "ND" INDICATES ANALYTE NOT DETECTED AT LEVEL ABOVE REPORTING LIMIT. REPORTING LIMIT IS GIVEN IN PARENTHESES " UNITS FOR ALL NON LIQUID SAMPLES ARE REPORTED ON A DRY WEIGHT BASIS ••• ACTIONS LEVELS ARE PROVIDED ONLY WHEN PARAMETER DATA IS USED FOR A GENERALLY CONSISTENT APPLICATION. WHEN PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE USED AS GUIDELINES ONLY. THE APPROPRIATE REGULATORY DOCUMENT SHOULD BE CONSULTED BEFORE MAKING ANY DECISIONS BASED ON ANALYTICAL DATA APPROVED BY: \ Page 2 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 4/30/01 RAL 8620 Holly Drive • Everett, WA 98208 • 425 356 -2600 • FAX 425 356 -2626 • Seattle 206 292 -9039 Data file . Gas /BTEX 1 Injection Date Sample Name Acq Operator Acq. Method Analysis Method : FID1 A equivalent FID2 B equivalent D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105011 \015F1701.D Report Created on 5/3/01 & Time: Tue, 1. May. 2001 104118 -1 RR 100 LAH 70GB0301.M D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. 9:39:42 AM 5:53:58 PM counts 12000 — 10000 8000 — 6000 — 4000 - 2000 — FID1 A, (70105011 \015F1701.D) ml co (mi c. 0_ N N Nm ( (0. r` 0 N (0 am Tti o0):. Gasoline Envelope ao g-(D co e �IQ R N \`j e�V Cj\ 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105011 \015F1701.D) counts 12000 - 10000 — 8000 —. 6000 - 4000 — 2000 0 0 co (0 N W m r N co 0) .61 cn N O0 'I7 ar: N w (0 N (0 0 a0 10 15 +) N.; C., mr I CO N d: (o O • V c •` X o cn, ; N Lo ■ =' r C LL. Q). I.6 I �I O 'co ao • i ; ''' 1.7.1..; 0 ;'v S � %I 44-37 LCD 19 G (Qi `+" CO (�- O (moo 20 25 min o cam 1- 4,71= �F'"r m. -oer! VC' ao0'i 0' COMM (0==._ c'O, i CO' QauN: c® oa90 rxoI v . cocain. 0130 N' Lan O: ' M i (W ... • I;; Lo Ql ! m ' j' N(D(D ii 07 (0 N 5 10 Ret. Compound Name 15 Area Amount ug /L 20 25 min 8.619 TFT- Surrogate 14.178 Gasoline Envelope 127219.062 1997772.625 11.452 -10pct--115/ 235.244 Ret. Compound Name Vii,EWED BY 1 DATE Area Amount ug /L 4.095 MTBE 6.821 Benzene 8.618 TFT - Surrogate 10.754 Toluene 13.937 Ethylbenzene 14.177 M & P Xylenes 14.915 O- Xylene 76067.891 259226.234 317840.469 21168.320 389446.406 1479629.250 250638.156 0.782 2.432 10.407/(N/ 0.141 4.587 15.257 2.487 J External Standard Report llta File Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41043001 \024F1001.D ilierator : KAS _hstrument : DIESEL #2 Ample Name : 104118 -1 n Time Ear Code: squired on : 01 May 01 00:28 AM :import Created on: 01 May 01 01:58 PM list Recalib on : 28 FEB 01 12:24 PM `iultiplior : 1 Pa ATE J'-1 <))\ 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 - 7000 6000 5000 ' 4000 3000 - 2000 1000 O O 10 user modified / | ',�) �^/�m4 �L ^ ��/-^' 20 30 Q'TOOT36Z0 \TOOE OTI7WIVO \b \W3HOdH \:Q uT T 'Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70104301 \016F1801.D ▪ Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/1/01 8:21:14 AM Injection Date & Time: Mon, 30. Apr. 2001 7:18:27 PM ' Sample Name : 104118 -2 5 iCG�, 44 Acq Operator : LAH '06 Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M 1-/ 'analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301 M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70104301 \016F1801.D) counts - 07 r)i M .0' n _ 'm N.. C _0 N VI Q -. ) o: cRJ r•) ,i(2<r,tri . O. N 12000 Tr Lo , n 10000 8000 6000 — 4000 — O _ N , 2000 — (Ni 0 counts 12000 10000 0 5 FID2 B, (70104301 \016F1801.D) O co 8000 — Nj to co 6000 - 'OW) 4000 - 2000 - •• wr r4rycr ., am! m0r4*c).: Tsar i_Locceesto,: jrr • 10 15 20 25 min 0) 0).: c, N NIco N gin (L:+eC0)J r o2001e0) 1110m0- COO V01 0:1:0 ears: coe-,00: , 0)a)e-•e2m aaicla• aPfl`e). co!! ()F'. �faON.L'��.; r cqC; rv� !I(.D qiiN i O 0) 0 . N ,i0:. r ' CO -!� tp • . • ::N I i. O r) g 0 5 10 15 20 25 min Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.627 TFT- Surrogate 14.187 Gasoline Envelope 135932.656 3902244.000 12.2910-37 478.598 .92'/C,c04-9L Ret. Compound Name Area 007, 5 . ,,) \ Arnotint- ug/L 4.118 MTBE 6.826. Benzene 8.625 TFT- Surrogate 10.762 Toluene 13.944 Ethylbenzene 14.186 M & P Xylenes 14.921 O- Xylene 11= 1 1CL� j� T= 168184.078 330083.688 344294.844 571950.062 1605620.125 6100248.500 1310596.375 1.729 3.333 11.323113% 6.455 22.020 71.731 1.692 3 L 11 0 ), .(_Nj 1 tl) L External Standard Report Data File Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41043001 \025F1001.D Operator : KAS Page Number : 1 Instrument : DIESEL #2 Vial Number : 25 Sample Name : 104118 -2 Injection Number : 1 1.0e4 9000 8000 - 7000 6000 - 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 O 0 user modified r ' 10 20 30 Q'TOOT3SZ0 \TOH f70Tb \VZVQ \b \W3HOdH \:Q LIT T Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70104301 \017F1901.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/1/01 8:21:28 AM Injection Date & Time: Mon, 30. Apr. 2001 7:53:53 PM Sample Name : 104118 -3 5ML Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301 M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. counts 12000 10000 - 8000 - 6000 - 4000 2000 - FID1 A, (70104301 \017F1901.D) LCD c4 1 0. N N !i o.o lC) O •ui 0 o O 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70104301 \017F1901.D) counts : of CO!! 12000 - II 10000 - N m tu N 2 8000 ; I N o in y 6000 - ;� v ° VD !v CO 4000 ; car : ! _ .. ' IL I'Hc0D 2000 j I I I`,. ,. L____ -_.._ 6.810 - Benzene 0 m N O r- N N N v co c N N N 10 15 20 25 min 10.765 - Toluene N C) I 0 T X 0 N N e70 uI to N CO COO CD Fj 0 5 I 10 15 20 25 min Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.630 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 116125.352 0.000 10.383 IL/ 0.000 CCL 1..;U C !L ( .1 DATE Ret. Compound Name • Area Amount ug /L 4.102 MTBE 6.810 Benzene 8.629 TFT- Surrogate 10.765 Toluene 13.947 Ethylbenzene 14.189 M & P Xylenes 14.926 O- Xylene 29798.623 7308.396 312914.437 9734.560 5608.334 28472.344 7722.209 0.306 0.050 10.237(C /. 0.065 0.040 0.144 0.055 - - - - -- - - - - -- --------------- ------ gam /l ME=L► m l 3 3V _�_1 I tfacm • = • 1.0e4 - 9000 8000 7000 - 6000 5000- 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 10 user modified 20 30 0) Q'TOOT39ZO \TOOE 0Tf7WITI \b \HEH3dH \:Q LIT T 'Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105021 \013F1301.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/2/01 Injection Date & Time: Wed, 2. May. 2001 3:37:29 PM 5:25:58 PM ISample Name Acq Operator Acq. Method IAnalysis Method : FID1 A equivalent FID2 B equivalent 104118 -4 RR 25UL LAH 70GB0301.M D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105021 \013F1301.D) mints- cim 12000 10000 — 8000 — 6000 — 4000 - 2000 — 0 fPJ 0 5 FID2 B, (70105021 \013F1301.D) counts 12000 10000 - 8000 — 6000 - 4000 -' 2000 - 00 0. 10 15 20 25 min 0 5 10 15 Ret. Compound Name Area 20 Amount ug /L 8.617 TFT- Surrogate 19.263 Gasoline Envelope 24956.633 25 min 2.072 )(, --1,2-SS ; lG�tCO'S3� 11547444.000 1455.501 Eic6 Ret. Compound Name 51,14 L Le SIC) Area Amount ug /L 4.142 MTBE 6.798. Benzene 8.615 TFT- Surrogate 10.750 Toluene 13.891 Ethylbenzene 14.194 M & P Xylenes 14.943 O- Xylene O .4/5j Ik y <o 1 66495.383 5973.165 70381.906 7601.013 141411.109 85076.336 123189.734 it_c) 0.684 1 0.041 11.t.t (�r�,r' Ili 1.032 1.841741• AI 1 0. 051 Ur��, irtiV�• ,ijl 1i ii 0.431 (3 ,kit of t 0. 882 C z ,s ;�� 1% ) 61) _A --------------- ------ - - -- -- External Standard Report ............... ................................... eport=====- _--- _--- _------- - - - - -- 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 7000 6000 5000 - 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0, 0 10 user modified 20 30 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \033F2001.D • • • Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105011 \021F2301.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/2/01 Injection Date & Time: Tue, 1 May. 2001 9:26:39 PM Sample Name : 104118 -5 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 4:53:35 PM FID1 A, (70105011 \021F2301.D) cob N- (0 roo n GD (D N counts 12000 L- 10000 8000 - 6000 - 4000 = 2000 - 0 0 FID2 B, Gasoline Envelope counts_-. 12000 10000 —. 8000 — 6000 4000 2000 - 0 0 5 (70105011 \021 F2301. D) co co co fV O O N 10 15 20 25 min l0 N 0 n N 5 10 15 20 Ret. Compound Name Area 8.620 TFT- Surrogate 17.708 Gasoline Envelope 96026.242 425218.375 Amount ug /L 1x) 8.44834/ 38.793 Cc 5.C) c(� Ret. Compound Name I REVIEWED B" r & D A T E �_ • 5'10 DATE \ _..._ Area Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.806 Benzene 8.619 TFT - Surrogate 10.758 Toluene 13.943 Ethylbenzene 14.191 M & P Xylenes 14.922 O- Xylene 0.000 4185.838 262403.625 13065.202 33170.035 83960.922 13187.614 0.000 0.029 8.488 3,`-.)4 0.087 0.238 0.425 0.094 r `C 11�`C I i4: JJ X�.Sr %16/ External Standard Report Ita File Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \034F2001.D orator : KAS _ nstrument : DIESEL #2 ‚rnple Name : 104118 -5 n Time Bar Code: .cquired on : 02 May 01 07 :24 AM port Created on: 02 May 01 01:24 PM st Recalib on : 28 FEB 01 12:24 PM Multiplier : 1 ,J Mac= i , t-)-7-C I i2p; 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 - 7000 6000 �-5O00 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 user modified b| . ,'.^� /�~---�—� 10 20 / 30 Q' TOOZ3bE0 \TOTOSOTbldivc \b \WEHodH \:Q LIT T Iata file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105011 \022F2401.D as /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/2/01 4:53:00 PM Injection Date & Time: Tue, 1. May. 2001 10:01:59 PM IamplName : 104118 -6 100UL e q Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M ,F"Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M ID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105011 \022F2401.D) counts: a ▪ ~ 1° a; V-. CD N f9 N , u� 12000 — • 10000 - u_' i— • co 8000 - co n o ° 0�.E s000 V cc• i.cnci 4000 — ° N 2000 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105011 \022F2401.D) counts 12000 — 10000 —. 8000 - 6000 — 4000 — 2000 0 0 w: C • 3 10 15 20 25 min Cr) OOf) D) CD[7n Co rao0.) C 7(CT)G r r.rN N (' M . N 1": U) C N N • CD . M G r Cr) o N • cD 1- . �� N co : rnrn� �,- ..in (L_ co C•lii • CD C'') 5-rte l Ph: C p•-1• --.1s1 Q .i r7 N. 5 10 15 20 25 ( min Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.618 TFT- Surrogate 16.773 Gasoline Envelope 96566.680 5990029.500 8.500 u5 /• 745.375 c1�. 31 C �- ) 0 (L = I ►roc C� �S 7 �� /, 1 L- 7. ) Ret. Compound Name �"� Area 7. Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.795. Benzene 8.618 TFT- Surrogate 10.761 Toluene 13.937 Ethylbenzene 14.227 M & P Xylenes 14.800 O- Xylene b; 0.000 3949.655 261664.047 9917.296 14778.817 89151.508 86088.875 0.000 0.027 8.463556/. 0.066 0.106 0.451 0.616 L '7_�l�) Ll ______ - - -- External Standard Report Data File Operator Instrument Sample Name Run Time Bar Name Code: Acquired on Report Created on: Last Recalib on . Multiplier D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \035F2001.D KAS Page Number . DIESEL #2 Vial Number . 104118 -6 Injection Number : Sequence Line : 01 Instrument Method: 01 Analysis Method . 01 Sample Amount . ISTD Amount 02 May 02 May 28 FEB 1 08:04 AM 01:25 PM 12:24 PM Sig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \035F2001.D Ret Time Area Type Width Ref# ug /ml I I I - - - -I I I 12.339 * not found * 1 22.204 50556 MM T 0.033 1 Not all calibrated peaks were found User Modified Name TPH -Dsl envelope 11.622 nC -25 surrogate 1 35 1 20 4DXT0201.MTH 4DSL0201.MTH 0 IC z--X me I lJ J MC-= L!CrrQ � ty�a PC:7-1'4 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 - 0 0 user modified • .1. 10 20 30 H. t0 0' TOOZZSS0 \TOTOSOT6 \VZV0 \t\WHHDdH \:0 LIT T =•••• Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105011 \023F2501.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/2/01 Injection Date & Time: Tue, 1. May. 2001 10:37:20 PM Sample Name : 104118 -; 1000L Acq Operator : LAH 1 Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 4:55:42 PM FID1 A, (70105011 \023F2501.D) counts - 12000 - 10000 - 8000 _ 6000 - 4000 2000 - 0 0 FID2 B, counts 12000 - 10000 - 8000 - 6000 - 4000 - 2000 - 0 m. O: 1 5 (70105011 \023F2501. D) co N N 10 15 20 25 min UP- CfN T 10.755 - Toluene N, G) di c c ! a� �+ X OI � rn Q1I• �1 • 0) • o) . cei O) I■mM Cr '1 Ln Loin n 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 min Ret. Compound Name Area 8.617 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 100552.961 0.000 External Standard Report -- ------------- - - - - -- File Name Jta rator instrument temple Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \036F2201.D : KAS : DIESEL #2 : 104118 -7 n Time Bar Code: Acquired on : 02 May 01 09:25 AM port Created on: 02 May 01 01:33 PM tort Recalib on : 27 FEB 01 02:34 PM Multiplier : 1 iltTime Area Type Width g. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \036F2201.D et Time Area Type Width '12.135 21.670 22.204 ,26.782 User Modified 111004 MM 1.271 1 107355 MM R 0.065 1 52048 MM T 0.032 1 36472 MM 1.539 1 Y`r,i;cc:i i , = J ZG % . J I I Page Number : 1 Vial Number : 36 Injection Number : 1 Sequence Line : 22 Instrument Method: 4DXT0201.MTH Analysis Method : 4DXT0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Name 24.309 TPH -Dsl envelope 47.050 MOTOR OIL 11.956 nC -25 surrogate 45.252 MOTOR OIL {2} �'��_v ay _ (Rs, I b I 1 • • • 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 user modified 10 20 30 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \036F2201.D Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105011 \024F2601.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/2/01 4:55:52 PM Injection Date & Time: Tue, 1 May 2001 11:12:39 PM ISample Name : 104118 -8 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105011 \024F2601.D) Counts- MD °1 V� N 0 0) NN .(n 2. 12000 - cn F2- 10000 - i- 8000 = co (D'; 6000 - 00 (PD i° U7 • op • 4000 - ° N . 2000 - 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105011 \024F2601.D) Counts_:. O'' CI o' 12000 _ B co (n cn I2- 10000 - N I-. 8000 = ,1- m r- ' (rj C (O , sc 6000 = co c ri mms 4000 - R' ' o ,(, . o 2000 - Ti (D(G.: rn 0 10 15 20 25 min 10.757 - Toluene a g. N C N Y X L N O m N rn 0Tr o mo N ttl a� M F- �- 0 5 10 15 20 25 min Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.618 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 99444.453 0.000 lid 8.777 V/- 0.000 Cla:=7 Lji Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.866 Benzene 8.617 TFT- Surrogate 10.757 Toluene 13.941 Ethylbenzene 14.184 M & P Xylenes 14.922 O- Xylene 0.000 2392.161 272680.125 2269.895 1844.423 7222.648 2198 .210 E. . ) 0 • � J 0.000 0.016 0.015 0.013 0.037 0.016 ■ -7LJ7J ............................................................................... External Standard Report Not all calibrated peaks were found , 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 10 20 30 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \037F2201.D Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105021 \016F1701.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 ; 8:07:16 AM Injection Date & Time: Wed, 2. May. 2001 6:00:44 PM Sample Name : 104118 -9 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. counts: 12000 - 10000 -- 8000 - 6000 - FID1 A, (70105021 \016F1701.D) �' Ica N fiV tri. • oc 4000 - - N 2000 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105021 \016F1701.D) counts 12000 0 10000 - N a) N 8000 - 6000 , 4000 2000 - W Q] 2 n a m a) cq 10 15 20 25 min . a) . a a) 2 a) (n X da 5.5 1-: . y tai C �- C a) co . 2 T 0: >' n a0- n N CO •dye '"'.- " c, v m P C n a0 ' cr) it .. .., , 0 0 5 10 '15 Ret. Compound Name Area 20 25 min Amount ug /L ) r`E 8.609 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 100571.148 0.000 • I Ret. Compound Name Area 8.886 a9/ 0.000 It ••EV! ; _ � B DATE II. Amount ug /L 4.147 MTBE 0.000 Benzene 8.608 TFT- Surrogate 10.747 Toluene 13.933 Ethylbenzene 14.174 M & P Xylenes 14.912 O- Xylene 5180.528 0.000 273463.594 7264.192 4543.862 19491.801 5055.790 0.053 0.000 8.871 1/. 0.048 0.033 0.099 0.036 x 411E9 1=1- -00) -------------------- External Standard Report ta File Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \038F2201.D rator KAS Instrument : DIESEL #2 "pie Name : 104118 -9 Time Bar Code: acquired on : 02 May 01 10:52 AM Iort Created on: 02 May 01 01:26 PM t Recalib on : 28 FEB 01 12:24 PM Multiplier : 1 3lig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050101 \038F2201.D et Time Area Type Width Ref# ug /ml 1 I I I I 1E12_2.339 * not found * 1 2.204 52409 BB 0.030 1 It all calibrated peaks were found 1\%'J ivre-=-4EC J J J J YPr • • 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 10 20 30 Q' TOZZ38S0 \TOTOSOTb\VZTQ \b\W3H3dH \ :Q UT T I ata file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105021 \017F1801.D as /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 8:07:26 AM Injection Date & Time: Wed, 2. May. 2001 6:36:23 PM irample Name : 104118 -10 100UL cq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M li nalysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M ID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105021 \017F1801.D) counts '- co: �. VD N' • CI NV tC) 2 • 12000 — H 10000 — i- 8000 - c-, ccp. co 6000 - em cci:6 C3. 4000 — _ Q'I' 2000 — 0 N N Cr) N counts 0 5 FID2 B, (70105021 \017F1801.D) 12000 10000 = 8000 6000 — 4000 — M N N Nts- 2000 = 0 0 w m co v 10 15 20 25 min WtD n Wn oti 10.753 - Toluene co O 0 (N) *V N 10 15 Ret. Compound Name Area 8.613 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 104349.742 0.000 20 25 min Amount ug /L b)N I,(,I1.. 6 - g0C 9.249 co/ 0.000 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 4.146 MTBE 6.786 Benzene 8.612 TFT- Surrogate 10.753 Toluene 13.938 Ethylbenzene 14.181 M & P Xylenes 14.917 O- Xylene 36216.133 4090.025 282663.063 5430.722 4441.138 15110.402 8155.248 0.372 0.028 9.1896/(' 0.036 0.032 0.077 0.058 X`t.3i^/1(1k( ____ ______________ ___ __ __ External Standard, _ Report _____ -___ 1.0e4 - 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 p 10 20 30 P- LR Q' TOE03650 \TONSOT6 \KZKQ \6 \143H3dH \:Q uT T Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105021 \018F1901.D Gas /E_EX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 8:07:35 AM Injection Date & Time: Wed, 2. May. 2001 7:11:47 PM Sample Name : 104118 -11 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105021 \018F1901.D) counts ' NCO :�. a. ao N,. Cn rjy (Ail 2 12000 - c'n 10000 - I 1, a0 '8000 - CD 6000 i ? 4000 - ¢a� ; I d 2000 -.. _.._. 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105021 \018F1901.D) counts 12000 - 10000 - 8000 - 6000 4000 j. 2000 - 0 10 15 20 25 min OJ CO c) N Q. N C N O 0 C • C N N N 7 (0) W y n D a, X CO C (D Q ' H CD 2 c CO ur 4) U7 n �!• '0 wwwo ,T I n Lo ra? ?�, v co-- o (n (Rn I n,- n.- - rT I'mi con nw O it :1 N Ni N w o c N v. N el 1 Tv ulzccors (V .I (TAN . N COJ 0 10 15 20 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.618 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 101226.961 0.000 8.949 5/'• 0.000 G7,(n `J r �r e j Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 4.149 MTBE 6.798 Benzene 8.617 TFT- Surrogate 10.756 Toluene 13.937 Ethylbenzene 14.181 M & P Xylenes 14.921 O- Xylene 8940.979 2064.877 277013.094 9070.711 3977.792 16629.465 7881.314 )(.(C)..3rn'?.5I1 0.092 0.014 8.9949D/ 0.061 0.029 0.084 0.056 External Standard Report --- ------------- -- - - - - -- - - - -- i a File Name : D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050201 \040F0301.D >irator : KAS Page Number : 1 : nstrument : DIESEL #2 Vial Number : 40 "pie Name : 104118 -11 Time Bar Code: = _cquired on : 02 May 01 01:18 PM ort Created on: 02 May 01 04:39 PM t Recalib on : 28 FEB 01 12:24 PM •?ultiplier : 1 1. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050201 \040F0301.D Time Area Type Width Ref# ug /ml I I I I I 2.318 * not found * 1 2.206 77026 BB 0.029 1 all calibrated peaks were found r- UD: Cy- ii •: 1.. :.11� 9Y • :.�� 5'31 vR • 1.0e4 - 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 0 10 20 30 Q'T0E030b0 \TOZOSOTb \VIVO \6\W3HOdH \:Q LIT Z file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105021 \019F2001.D Iata as /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 8:07:43 AM Injection Date & Time: Wed, 2. May. 2001 7 :47:23 PM I ample Name : 104118 -12 1000L q Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M irnalysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M ID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis ----------------------------------------- External Standard Report kftipl 1.1e4 1.0e4 9000 - 8000 --. 7000 - 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 - 1000 0 10 20 30 1 in D: \HPCHEM \4 \DATA \41050301 \041F0901.D Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \008F0801.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 Sample Name : 104118 -13 RR 100 Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 1:10:21 PM External Standard Report _____________________________________________________________________ :ia File Name : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \021F0701.D Allbrator : kas Page Number : 1 Enstrument : DIESEL #1 Vial Number : 21 linple Name : 104118 -13 Injection Number : 1 %i Time Bar Code: Sequence Line : 7 acquired on : 03 May 01 06:56 PM Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH ort Created on: 04 May 01 07:46 AM Analysis Method : TPHD0201.MTH t Recalib on : 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM Sample Amount : 0 Multiplier : 1 ISTD Amount ilg. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \021F0701.D ?et Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1 Name 115.760 1 I * not found * 1 'Diesel #2 22.255 44432 MM T 0.031 1 9.753 nC -25 surrogate/, N t all calibrated peaks were found 1 User Modified 1 • • • • • • • 1.3e4 1.2e4 - 1.1e4 - 1.0e4 - 9000 8000 - 7000 - 6000 - 5000 4000 - 3000 - 10 user modified 20 30 Q' TOL03TZ0 \TOEOSOTT \VZWQ \T \NEHDdH \:Q uT Data file : D:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\70105031\009F0901.D las/BTEX 2 Report Created on 5/3/01 1:42:58 PM njection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 1:12:51 PM Sample Name : 104118-14 RR 100 Itcq Operator : LAH cq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D:\HPCHEM\5\METHODS\70GB0301.M ID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105031 \009F0901.D) o counts ; V23 - : r, r-- _ no _ csisi • wi • 12000- _ . . 10000 7 a, cn. u_. 8000- i • , • 'a.' • Lc) . . ...., Nb.zr ,7 t: trP.t■ 6000 -:. : cs, • co 4000 ••._,...•. . • , • • - • . ' • . . • t-N -cr. cycl) NI- • •co co NI- o c., -- N.:• • •• • • ' .• 2000 ---- - - - -• - - 0 0 5 10 FID2 B, (70105031\009F0901.D) 15 20 25 min counts : c CV' or (ii. a) a • 2: a) >, 12000 N V 0 (9: 1'' g251,-5 MI.... .- V 1000o- C\!.1 N N O P 2 N CD I :, r). • : , D 120 CD ! 0 >. 171 1.0 ri CO 8000 -:" -- N 06 V 6 CV N i : crSID 0 a) ca • r- 6000- laa • • ' ' .• : ‘c:Ifil • .cf) co C w N 06; el in r•- • '14 N"..c) N.. c'12::::!v.- 7..Tcpilte... i.,77.....:::"::'.. - 0 rte; • H. .4- • aka -a L'cli e• l Lo ,- co ,,,N. t ,■ :11,. (:),/.5-''‘''.7. 7 : !I ..e • !Ill .!, . :'..!:! , 4 1....„... .,-. :'- ,- .- ,-. co . ! li •-•-• 7 'Fr "' ',! l• ''!•'. (64.: o6 !Cr; 1- 7 2000 : : !: l l• .... . • . .,......•._.•._..... 0 0 5 10 15 20 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug/L 8.614 TFT-Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 93571.320 0.000 25 min 8.211 ::-10)Cia'.82, 0.000 Ret. irs Compound Name Area Amount ug/L 0.000 MTBE 6.791 Benzene 8.614 TFT-Surrogate 10.753 Toluene 13.937 Ethylbenzene 14.178 M & P Xylenes 14.917 O-Xylene 0.000 3635.400 254475.641 10603.790 4690.280 21127.854 5493.494 0.000 0.025 8.214V4 0.071 0.034 0.107 0.039 <6.:)1,11.90 External Standard Report 1. 3e4 1.2e4 - 1.1e4 1.0e4 - 9000 - 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 O '—�-_---_' user modified 10 20 ] 30 -- ' ' ......... -_- Q' IOL03ZZ0 \IOZOSOII \KZ \Q \I \NEHDdH \:0 uT Data file : D:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\70105021\026F2901.D Gas/BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/4/01 1:39:09 PM Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 1:06:34 AM Sample Name : 104118-15 1OUL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D:\HPCHEM\5\METHODS\70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105021\026F2901.D) um arsom .,Icsv lammIccra.omimmm.:.• counts um CaCCO regniczary,.7,-, CUOICCM111 . • 1 'CO CS-XO CONWOOTI ,r, reC19-0.13" . e • - Clii v■i7i uvi coi.:m■I:c63.5"oilisizicriD; , ' • 12000— • . • ;. .. = ' .:::1 ... . : 'u,) ' . . ' ;;, . I,— ' '. ,• 10000— ; • , • • 8000— • . •;::c.i. . :;. Id - • .i iH :1 • ;cm ' . 't • • : . , 1 6000— oco crii 4000 : oil ....---- 2000 — _ 0 .a w c .17) .> .0 53 rc■ '0 co co ci F'J 0 5 FID2 B, (70105021\026F2901.D) mIcammo 05.711.flo'en.cr) a) :.,_• I • . : ; • • • .• • • •••• • . , • 0 ' " Lf =Jilts: w 03 F- 12000 7 MT) e CC) CO V: 10000 : CO CO 8 tn •cic,„ 8000 : c,i cio m • 6000 — • u-) . . i- N. •zr. (,i. -51:c'' :: erco ▪ ..... ,cri en • 1 4000 — 10 15 20 25 2000 — 0 • :1 0 5 10 15 20 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug/L 8.625 TFT-Surrogate 13.168 Gasoline Envelope min 25 min 1`)t-4 :krtpcj 28937.943 2.403K 31435192.000 3996.757 L'1cC Ret.--Compound Name. 1 LL ;c:s./ Area Amount ug/L 4.076 MTBE 6.872 Benzene 8.625 TFT-Surrogate 10.626 Toluene 13.908 Ethylbenzene 14.221 M & P Xylenes 14.952 O-Xylene 52425.336 205242.719 85317.984 868072.438 1283919.625 487483.000 762832.000 sr- 5r.u.3 Ike b= 0.539 1.746 2.358X 10.283 17.408 3.131 9.352 12. (-V 130",5ilki low c4.2 -1-Gcm,Fc17. • --q--Olo4 Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \010F1001.D Ias/BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/4/01 njection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 2:16:07 PM Sample Name : 104118 -15 RR 1UL Icq Operator : LAH cq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M A equivalent to FID analysis. IfID1 ID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 1:22:10 PM FID1 A, (70105031 \010F1001.D) counts 12000 - 10000 - 8000 - 6000 - 4000 - 2000 - 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105031 \010F1001.D) counts - N 111 N N O N N 0 U') 12000 - 10000 - 8000 - 6000 - 4000 - 2000 - 0 0 n Lo 10 15 20 25 min LL- 5 10 15 Ret. Compound Name Area 20 25 mn Amount ug /L 8.621 TFT- Surrogate 13.155 Gasoline Envelope 5732.674 3593110.250 0.476 439.097 (J J9 . Cc/7 ./1,1 Ret. Compound Name (c-g) Area 3zoj ► �/z Amount ug /L 4.144 6.865 8.621 10.751 13.904 14.130 14.943 MTBE Benzene TFT- Surrogate Toluene Ethylbenzene M & P Xylenes O- Xylene 10271.799 18969.037 9354.207 13772.893 151937.656 141865.891 106666.320 r• 0.106 0.129 0.203 0.092 1.183 0.718 0.764 External Standard Report --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Data File Name Operator : kas Instrument : DIESEL #1 Sample Name : 104118 -15 Run Time Bar Code: Acquired on : 03 May 01 08:24 PM Report Created on: 04 May 01 07:47 AM Last Recalib on : 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM Multiplier : 1 : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \023F0701.D Sig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \023F0701.D Ret Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1, I I I i I I Page Number : 1 Vial Number : 23 Injection Number : 1 Sequence Line : 7 Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH Analysis Method :-TPHD0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Name 15.760 * not found * 1 Diesel #2 22.257 48223 MM T 0.029 1 10.606 nC -25 surrogate IGls.i. Not all calibrated peaks were found User Modified t'J Mt- 4E0 r f V9 J 1/o LAT1 L Qom) PILDDLdCr 1.3e4 1.2e4 1.1e4 - 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 0 10 user modified it 20 30 TOL03SZ0 \TOEOSOTT \VIVO \T\WEHOdH \: d •• Data file . Gas /BTEX 1 Injection Date Sample Name Acq Operator Acq. Method Analysis Method : FID1 A equivalent FID2 B equivalent D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \0111F1101.D Report Created on 5/4/01 , & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 1:23:31 PM 2:51:52 PM 104118 -16 RR 100 LAH 70GB0301.M D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105031 \011F1101.D) counts - 12000 10000 - 8000 -_ 6000 - 4000 - 2000 -. - 0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105031 \011F1101.D) COD CA CQV 0 0 N CV (O N I . tn, i counts - 12000 - 10000 8000 6000 - 4000 - 2000 -_ 0 0 co co 0 : 4 . 6 C) N 10 .v c aK 15' 20 25 min N: 0 • 0 co CO CO O m, o co co co co' Q) N, N v of n N N 5 10 15 20 25 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.614 TFT- Surrogate 17.703 Gasoline Envelope 93707.344 505494.719 External Standard Report 'ata File Name : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \024F0701.D Asrator : kas trument : DIESEL #1 ample Name : 104118 -16 ir Time Bar Code: =uired on : 03 May 01 09:08 PM deport Created on: 04 May 01 07:47 AM st Recalib on : 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM list Recalib : 1 lig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \024F0701.D t Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1 ,22.255 43567 MM T 0.031 1 Page Number : 1 Vial Number : 24 Injection Number : 1 Sequence Line : 7 Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH Analysis Method : TPHD0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Name 15.760 * not found * 1 Diesel #2 / 9.558 nC -25 surrogate q( /. 't all calibrated peaks were found ler Modified 10(1 z_Dbirr6i 1\AD----LLM rcs SE., �.:,,� � Pt'f r•-c3V user modified 1.3e4 1.2e4 1.1e4 - 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 p 10 20 30 13' TOL03bZ0 .\TOSOSOTT \VZVQ \T \N3H0dH \:Q LIT Data file : D:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\70105031\012F1201.D liGas/BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/3/01 Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 3:27:40 PM Sample Name : 104118-17 le4PUL IlAcci Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D:\HPCHEM\5\METHODS\70GB0301.M IIFID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 4:20:17 PM FID1 A, (70105031\012F1201.D) counts - 12000- 10000 H 8000 2 6000 2 4000 —_ 2000 2- 0 0 • 5 10 15 20 25 min FID2 B, (70105031\012F1201.D) munts: 12000 2 10000 8000 — 6000 — 4000 2_ 2000 2 0 0 5 Ret. Compound Name 10 15 20 Area 8.618 TFT-Surrogate 11.823 Gasoline Envelope 17490.527 6650999.500 25 min Amount ug/L1.1-1 1.4521 829.834 • 3q Ret. Compound Name XL_Sji-L6P-C611119/14C) C.Cthrt, Area TI (04cC:km ount ug/L 4.067 MTBE 6.836 Benzene 8.619 TFT-Surrogate 10.897 Toluene 13.921 Ethylbenzene 14.177 M & P Xylenes 14.944 O-Xylene 63546.035 218784.141 27478.252 173096.063 314087.000 435800.313 210085.422 7rvji • r4L)Ikei 0.653 1.918 0.59644 1.300 3.507 2.500 1.944 ‘Ri9 I ouJ fecLidfLy, 1-7 , Ikq External Standard Report Data File Name : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \025F0701.D Operator : kas Page Number : 1 Instrument : DIESEL #1 Vial Number : 25 Sample Name : 104118 -17 Injection Number : 1 Run Time Bar Code: Sequence Line : 7 Acquired on : 03 May 01 09:52 PM Report Created on: 04 May 01 07:48 AM Last Recalib on : 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM Multiplier : 1 Sig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \025F0701.D Ret Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1 I I I I I 15.760 * not found * 1 22.257 55130 MM T 0.029 1 Not all calibrated peaks were found User Modified Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH Analysis Method : TPHD0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Name 1.3e4 1.2e4 - 1.1e4 - I'0e4 9000 8000 7000 - 6000 5000 4000 3000 0 10 user modified 20 30 Q'TOLOZSZO \TOEOSOTT \VZYu \T \N HDdH \:a LIT T Data file : D:\HPCHEM\2\DATA\70105031\013F1301.D Gas/BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/4/01 ' Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 4:03:26 PM 1:24:29 PM Sample Name Acq Operator Acq. Method Analysis Method : FID1 A equivalent FID2 B equivalent 104118-18 100UL LAH 70GB0301.M D:\HPCHEM\5\METHODS\70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105031\013F1301.D) counts: 12000 -_ 10000 8000 L. 6000 - 4000- 2000 - 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 min FID2 B, (70105031\013F1301.D) 12000 10000 8000 L. 6000 L. 4000 2000 0 0 ■:31- CN ci 7.6 • Emr*. o cri L.0 CD cric;CM —CC Of wit 07) C`F. TI0 COCOCO CID C130 Mts. cd '4":"!?1 cD".*. C°P. m csNilaccchr '5, • (t) : 6:4 a) i- . r, r, 1.1 -512 ' 0 ' • . !N. : •. c - . >.. 4 0 c co •, m 0 i . Q. c.- iL f9 o : : ' : : , '4' .4 . N CO• •-: ., , i N- = '. r, ,,,,m) . cc, Q. r..._ rx, 7-. , 2.00(P,, • .• (84 L-cti) ', x rer,',0„-Tro , couit, it,- sco .: .;rcr)...p, co, ..,;,-..; ..i. cofj rc'zi„ ds,' .• 7172 o(;), ....e . , ,: „.;..-i Lc; s4.r ,Tcp ;... . (Ni CO> 1441. .. ..1. !...... i . .4...'1. cr, '• , : -' 4 • : , , ' -. : 7- ,:.;,..r ,,i to ; • ',:,,,ist.: ,if:,:,.., , ;10. ;.-.: -, .; . . i, (46 j■r... 7- , i ,..m ,:! .11 ;•, 11 ,ili :, i ..• ...06 '' 'HT- ;i1. ,.:,'•'•, '.".0'.'' .. ;;;i..'! '1, . . I . ':: : ' ' ' '" • ! •-••• 5 10 15 20 25 min Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug/L 8.613 TFT-Surrogate 21.602 Gasoline Envelope 89788.805 1039512.938 7.847 7r/. 112.798 Ret. (k5 / Compound Name. Area Amdunt ug/L 0.000 MTBE 6.811 Benzene 8.613 TFT-Surrogate 10.753 Toluene 13.937 Ethylbenzene 14.186 M & P Xylenes 14.920 0-Xylene 0.000 24802.627 260309.922 6077.516 102199.234 88409.945 13339.266 0.000 0.169,my 8.416n'/' 0.041 0.734 0.448 0.096 <.r\ rv..5 &(- 3 yvt(". J S 3ta File Name erator : kas strument : DIESEL #1 :ample Name : 104118 -18 n Time Bar Code: quired on : 03 May 01 10:36 PM Report Created on: 04 May 01 07:48 AM list Recalib on : 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM ltiplier : 1 External Standard Report : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \026F0701.D Ig1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \026F0701.D . Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1 1 1 1 '15.760 * not found * 1 22.257 47285 MM T 0.031 1 'it all calibrated peaks were found lier Modified Page Number : 1 Vial Number : 26 Injection Number : 1 Sequence Line : 7 Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH Analysis Method : TPHD0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Name Diesel #2 10.395 nC -25 surrogate jC)LV I. CO: Z:c;5rY5 M.= 4Et) \-- e v\r,)\\,. 6-4-1-01 0-1-S user modified 1.3e4 1.2e4 1.1e4 - 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 0 10 20 30 Q'IOL039Z0 \TOEOSOTTWIVO I\W3H3dH \ :Q LIT T Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \005F0501.D ,Gas /BTEX 2 Report Created on 5/3/01 Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 10:49:21 AM 104118 -19 RR 100 LAH 70GB0301.M D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. 11:19:28 AM Sample Name 'Acq Operator Acq. Method Analysis Method : IFID1 A equivalent FID2 B equivalent FID1 A, (70105031 \005F0501.D) counts tNiNi KD 12000 10000 - 8000 - 6000 - C) 0) : 4000 - 2000 - ........ N 0, 100 N a) • 0) O 7.' N' LL F' 0 0, 0 5 FID2 B, (70105031 \005F0501.D) counts - 12000 10000 — 8000 - 6000 4000 2000 — 0 10 15 20 25 ay o 0 F—. 10.749 - Toluene a) m c X c g c i X 0 0 a. 0 .[I` S N lC) (0 0) O N. i. C 0 5 10 15 20 25 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 8.610 TFT- Surrogate 0.000 Gasoline Envelope 101881.961 0.000 9. 012' ;i6 P00 =`?0 (. 0.000 Ret. Compound Name s'af. 51\-'11\ Area '.._. Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.778 Benzene 8.609 TFT- Surrogate 10.749 Toluene 13.934 Ethylbenzene 14.174 M & P Xylenes 14.912 O- Xylene 0.000 3457.391 273672.781 18295.639 7929.796 44789.234 18956.461 0.000 0.024 8.878 8qL 0.122 0.057 0.227 0.136 5- OOP Data File Name Operator : kas Instrument : DIESEL #1 Sample Name : 104118 -19 Run Time Bar Code: Acquired on : 04 May 01 00:04 AM Report Created on: 04 May 01 07 :50 AM Last Recalib on : 03 MAY 01 02:26 PM Multiplier : 1 External Standard Report : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \028F0701.D Sig. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \028F0701.D Ret Time Area Type Width Ref# ug /ml I I 44.142 Diesel #2 134.350 Motor Oil 8.684 nC -25 surrogate 67.181 Motor Oil {2} Oar' 2_12.0g3 1 . 3e4 - 1.2e4 1.1e4 1.0e4 9000 8000 - 7000 - 6000 5000 4000 - 3000 - user modified -A 0 10 20 30 ..• • • •- ' 0' TOL038ZO \T08OSOTT \WZrQ \T \N2H3dH \:0 Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \014F1601.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/4/01 Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 Sample Name : 104118 -20 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. 9:27:38 AM 5:51:56 PM counts 12000 — 10000 8000 - '6000 '4000 2000 0: FID1 A, (70105031 \014F1601.D) (f) •t 0) t7C). N:: ®I amo °.i• I-00:•0, .I OC CO I N 17.717 - Gasoline Envelope 0w � a000®Z CO crmOMMITT NuloMMHDV ,.• L0 0 5 FID2 B, (70105031 \014F1601.D) v:. Q)I. tc)Ii counts i 12000 - 10000 - 8000 6000 - 4000 2000 - 0 0 O co N ,0) N • 0,01 N • N ;I 4) C 0) N CO IM 10 15 20 25 N PO)I. • r, •10) LI II'l� ' .I. 10 Ret. Compound Name 15 Area 20 25 min Amount ug /L bti'q ICI• -i.� 8.614 TFT- Surrogate 17.717 Gasoline Envelope 105629.727 34011564.000 9.373 4325. 966 170 o ,d. Ft'( eiL,5 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.862 Benzene 8.613 TFT- Surrogate 10.753 Toluene 13.936 Ethylbenzene 14.179 M & P Xylenes 14.917 O- Xylene ■ 0.000 24027.904 300204.375 88902.977 1884602.375 8283985.500 3316527.000 0.000 0.164 9.797 0.593 26.018 98.420 43.575 C-(1/9 4 7 1 / 0 - / - Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105041 \007F0801.D 104118 -20 RR 10 LAH 70GB0301.M D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M to FID analysis. to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105041 \007F0801.D) counts - caii 12000 — 10000 — 8000 — 6000 - 4000 — 2000 - _._. 0 o triN N counts 0 5 10 FID2 B, (70105041 \007F0801.D) 12000 _ 10000 — 8000 — 6000 4000 - 2000 — 0 0 c) c N N c a) CO 8.630 - TFT- Surrogate 15 20 25 mire c:) Sis co, • N .- .N ::�...; ,.i.� "Pli.4..•N .N . to i t[') ' 1'0 '. N . (h '(O ;; .rte; G� !i�._' :,O• r N • N 11 I :N O • i, N (0 5 10 15 20 25 min Ret Compound Name Area Amount ug /L blq 1.0)' 7.CI) 8.631 TFT- Surrogate 17.710 Gasoline Envelope 9818.002 3677495.750 0.815* 449.879 Ret. Compound Name -27-7E75 - ig(51:5 Area Amount ug /L 0.000 MTBE 6.878 Benzene 8.630 TFT- Surrogate 10.765 Toluene 13.942 Ethylbenzene 14.182 M & P Xylenes 14.923 O- Xylene Cy, 0.000 3113.408 30099.600 10172.081 186145.234 834041.125 329739.031 0.000 0.021 0.65 0.068 1.6731! 7.367 3.548 >6. IGw d ( }66.0J41a0 5 5- L/-6iL(- External Standard Report ........ -- ................................. ................................... 6-a_ci KR� 1.3e4 - 1.2e4 1.1e4 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 - 6000 5000 4000 3000 0 A sf user modified 1. I - I 10 20 30 Cn Q 1 in D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \029F1901.D Data file : D: \HPCHEM \2 \DATA \70105031 \015F1701.D Gas /BTEX 1 Report Created on 5/4/01 9:28:15 AM Injection Date & Time: Thu, 3. May. 2001 6:27:44 PM Sample Name : 104118 -21 100UL Acq Operator : LAH Acq. Method : 70GB0301.M Analysis Method : D: \HPCHEM \5 \METHODS \70GB0301.M FID1 A equivalent to FID analysis. FID2 B equivalent to PID analysis. FID1 A, (70105031 \015F1701.D) counts - o no (QV 12000 10000 = 8000 6000 - 4000 2000 - 0 N.I N.1 61 N t 0 5 FID2 B, (70105031 \015F1701.D) counts I -- NO 0) N111 MIM :I W E! 12000 - � ~ cni co m l np Lii C 00 �p6- .rJO :i 7 ,i1 tli� 10000 - t� F-; ��M i,,'! ji F0� I Tpp;,.1 i..4 )i') :I ! lI v 2 v1, o -71: 8000 - 'l ; I a) co ".W)' 6000 - Yi '1n 1 0o m .„ it , 11 ; . • ! : gti Tr' ,E-5 g 4000 i1 O ON ,911:$4m- 04),.,7, .III a�rn Ioi ls V: N R(Or �� 1 1;1 :!I�fi 2000 - �� il:.. 0 (o . .I, 0 0 5 10 10 1.5 20 25 r rnavl o'i Ret. Compound Name 15 20 25 Area Amount ug /L 8.614 TFT- Surrogate 17.707 Gasoline Envelope 149364.859 4333588.500 13.584 13(x/ 533.715 Lilt' (CIS= 5 337,715 il L 6.6,2 ybrid J J - : " "� " :�1 Ret. Compound Name Area Amount ug� /I "�- �'.- 4.146 MTBE 35163.391 0.362 6.796 Benzene 8301.446 0.057 8.614 TFT- Surrogate 258771.844 8.3624/. 10.754 Toluene 14711.191 0.098 13.938 Ethylbenzene 148054.188 1.127 14.178 M & P Xylenes 634158.063 4.924 14.931 O- Xylene 93710.266 0.671 min min 6., T <6, / i lL L <C k:c i External Standard Report Data File Name : D: \HPCHEM \1 \DATA \11050301 \030F1001.D Jerator : kas Page Number strument : DIESEL #1 Vial Number Sample Name : 104118 -21 lin Time Bar Code: quired on : 04 May 01 01:16 AM report Created on: 04 May 01 07:51 AM st Recalib on 05 FEB 01 09:08 AM ltiplier : 1 30 Injection Number : 1 Sequence Line : 10 Instrument Method: TDMO0201.MTH Analysis Method : TPHD0201.MTH Sample Amount : 0 ISTD Amount Ag. 1 in D: \HPCHEM \l \DATA \11050301 \030F1001.D t Time Area Type Width Ref# mg /1 Name 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15.760 * not found * 1 Diesel #2 I / 22.257 42742 MM T 0.029 1 9.373 nC -25 surrogategL� . :!t all calibrated peaks were found User Modified k)D: W LTh JI 1a2 1.3e4 - 1.2e4 1.1e4 1.0e4 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 0 • user modified 10 20 30 • ... • . • • • "" ' " Q' TOOT30E0 \TOEOSOTT \VZVQ\T \W3HDaH \:13 LIT 111 CCI Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 8620 Holly Drive Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 356-2600 (206) 292-9059 Seattle (425) 356 -2626 Fax Chain Of Custody/ Laboratory Analysis Request CCI Job# (Laboratory Use Only) Date 4/27/° ( Paue 1 Of 3 PROJECT ID: g0 1,1 - 00 ( - O ( c 11u \..0•" 0� , S11i) REPORT TO COMPANY: Cy e p ; n 5 '1 n e e r.s ANALYSIS REQUESTED OTHER (Specify) PROJECT J MANAGER: 0 g v e O K U 1 0 4 = 1 NWTPH -HCID J EPA 8021 ❑ 602 ❑ 0 co W EPA 8260 ❑ 624 ❑ IEPA 8270 ❑ 625 ❑ EPA 8081 /8082 ❑ 6080 PCB only ❑ Pest only ❑ Metals Priority Pollutant ❑ RCRA ❑ TAL ❑ Metals Other (Specify) TCLP - Metals 0 VOA ❑ Semi -Vol ❑ Pest 0 Herbs ❑ d 0 N d0 J o NUMBER OF CONTAINERS RECEIVED IN GOOD CONDmON? CC- LC♦ c-,--t �l ADDRESS: G it o TT{ .v do- i 5u —f q � "I Z 0 PHONE: 1O4-2 1 - 322.q FAX: 20G - ?2 Y- 2732 INVO T COMPANICE Y: O c toCnS1nr-,'t-g ATTENTION: Q/ 'tom �t L C , / / ADDRESS: 700 't g.�a C-4 St . 7u�� (;e LEI Zd ., -f-fI- LA/1k 5101 P.O. NUMBER EO Yt - Oo I - U I CCI QUOTE: SAMPLE I.D. DATE TIME TYPE LAB# B —3 ki? (► ie5b Co 1C 5 'O 2. 13 - G ) 33 w a ,� A s S 3. Alm- Y X710 _� 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. L 10. `✓ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS SIGNATURES (Name, Company, Date, Time): 1. Relinquished By: Received By -.0•41`f. 2. Relinquished By: T.., (Qr,ie.._, 6-67. Y�z7la /� /a �lU rZYc ailed e ved B — • T d n'au Ihin st av Inc jjCharv� � Everett, WA 98208 8620 Holly Drive fl1CCIUIcaI . Phone (425) 356 2600 Laboratory Analysis Request (04 11 (206) 292 -9059 Seattle (425) 356 -2626 Fax Date 024° ° ( Page 1- Of PROJECT ID: go yi -00 1 - 0 ( C /R,Juu -v, 0 1', S111) REPORT TO „ G G O E h 5'I h e f t s ANALYSIS REQUESTED OTHER (Specify) PROJECT MANAGER: D a u t 0 Q k ID M �. ! 103 I NWTPH -DX NWTPH -HCID EPA 8021 ❑ 602 ❑ 0 § 0 0 c°o W EPA 8260 ❑ 624 ❑ EPA 8270 ❑ 625 ❑ EPA 8081/8082 ❑ 6080 PCB only ❑ Pest only ❑ O 0 0 Metals Other (Specify) TCLP- Metals ❑ VOA ❑ Semi -Vol ❑ Pest ❑ Herbs ❑ NUMBER OF CONTAINERS RECEIVED IN GOOD CONDITION? �C 1 ADDRESS: 600 Tr {'V e - -} Si 5,, ; f Q 11{ I. 0 , 2 PHONE: 1O -Z31 - 322.'1 FAX: ZOt6 a — 72 - Z73 Z. INVOICE TO COMPANY; ATTENTION: ADDRESS: P.O. NUMBER CCI QUOTE: SAMPLE I.D. DATE TIME TYPE LAB# 1 C>6, —II tS 4Jzc(o1 13 /S � r--r * YP 2. 36 - )7, D 133 L, S 3. - /3,f /1.1 30 5 L $ X RR1; Q1 4. 1J rJ - / Z r C /Z/45 S 7 X �/■ J 5. f- lf, I 15Z0 c 1 IJ (j 1 :._ X >( )( i( x )< x A )_ 1 i ■ ■ i ( 6. 6/0- 1/t 5 / 5 H$ S 7. 0/1 - ?r5 /6 5 Z 8. f3)- lo, 5' //64/c 5 5 S 9. Cj►3-8 0 10. 17oc SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS SIGNATURES (Name, Company, Date, Time): 1. Relinquished By: 7• ^ Qr”' P � 652 y /z2/41 Received By `�C�'� ` �.G y/ 7 ° I /.?:5 U 2. Relinquished By Received By TURNAROUND REQUESTED in Business Days* Organic, Metals & Inorganic Analysis OTHER: a a 51 5 Specify Fuels & Hydrocarbon Analysis a a Ea. • Turnaround request leas than standard may Incur Rush Changes CCI Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 8620 Holly Drive Everett, WA 98208 Phone (425) 356 -2600 (206) 292-9059 Seattle (425) 356 -2626 Fax Chain Of Custody/ Laboratory Analysis Request ' Date 4127i° CCI Job# (Laboratory Use Only) Io41146 Page Of 1 PROJECT ID: go 14:i -CSC 1- 0 ( C . `utiiu..- 0 \', 1.,.-() REPORT TO COMPANY: C e o h J t,', h e e t• S ANALYSIS REQUESTED OTHER (Specify) , PROJECT MANAGER: U g v 4. /L MM L, z m x 0 p= z NWTPH -HCID EPA 8021 ❑ 602 0 0 cl 0 0 °w W EPA 8260 0 624 ❑ 0 to 0 o aNO w EPA 8081/80820 6080 PCB only ❑ Pest only ❑ Metals Priority Pollutant RCRA❑ TAL ❑ Metals Other (Specify) ITCLP- Metals ❑ VOA ❑ Semi -Vol ❑ Pest ❑ Herbs 0 coop O 00 ;. .J O 2 Q p • -° j) d 0 NUMBER OF CONTAINERS RECEIVED IN GOOD CONDITION? CCook, 1 /� T 5-. e k z o ADDRESS: GOO r{ w o,C -k (-ft , PHONE: lO C - l q - 3ZZ Q FAX: ZOC - 72 5 Z%3 Z INVOICE TO COMPANY: ATTENTION: ADDRESS: • P.O. NUMBER CCI QUOTE: SAMPLE I.D. DATE TIME TYPE LAB# 1 6 1 -3. 0 Lj/tG /ol 1y — I? )S / ` I !( 2 c3‘ -f!0 .t5-- 0 5 Il-I X 4. j2-- 1L(.O to 3o joys pt7O 1(3S 11 NS 5 5 5 5 ( t aJ i< x X x X y x x I 1 5. >33 -ll,f 6. D3 - /9 7. 13y- 7,3' 8. 131,/- //,S 10. 135 /b 1.7-ii 5S as v0I SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS - SIGNATURES (Name, Company, Date, Time): 1. Relinquished By: 7 • )L-h- --te_t C t r 1//z7j6// 12 11 G Received By: ' j,� Aj''�_� (-4. iii . // %a•. S-0 2. Relinquished By: lited EON ' TURNAROUND REQUESTED in Business Days* Organic, Metals & Inorganic Analysis OTHER: Specify 5 3 2 1 Fuels 8. Hydrocarbon Analysis 3 1 SAW • 0e'oE,ngineers • APPENDIX G REPORT LIMITATIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR USE4 This appendix provides information to help you manage your risks with respect to the use of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ARE PERFORMED FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, PERSONS AND PROJECTS GeoEngineers has performed this Phase I /Phase II ESA of the Museum of Flight (MOF) property located at 9404 Fast Marginal Way South in Seattle, Washington in general accordance with ASTM E 1527 -00, Standard Practice for Phase I ESAs and the scope and limitations of our proposals dated March 13 and April 25, 2001. This report has been prepared for use by MOF. This report is not intended for use by others, and the information contained herein is not applicable to other sites. GeoEngineers structures our services to meet the specific needs of our clients. For example, an environmental site assessment study conducted for a prospective purchase of a property may not fulfill the needs of the property owner. Because each environmental study is unique, each environmental report is unique, prepared solely for the specific client and project site. No one except MOF should rely on this environmental report without first conferring with GeoEngineers. This report should not be applied for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. THIS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT IS BASED ON A UNIQUE SET OF PROJECT - SPECIFIC FACTORS This report has been prepared for MOF. GeoEngineers considered a number of unique, project - specific factors when establishing the scope of services for this project and report. Unless GeoEngineers specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on this report if it was: • not prepared for you, • not prepared for your project, • not prepared for the specific site explored, or • completed before important project changes were made. If important changes are made to the project or site after the date of this report, GeoEngineers should be retained to review our interpretations and recommendations and to provide written modifications or confirmation, as appropriate. RELIANCE CONDITIONS FOR THIRD PARTIES If a lending agency or other parties intend to place legal reliance on the product of our services, we require that those parties indicate in writing their acknowledgement that the scope of Developed based on material provided by ASFE, Professional Finns Practicing in the Geosciences; www.asfe.org . G e o E n g i n e e r s G -1 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 services provided, and the general conditions under which the services were rendered including the limitation of, professional liability, are understood and accepted by them. This is to provide our firm with reasonable protection against open -ended liability claims by third parties with whom there would otherwise be no contractual limits to their actions. HISTORICAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY OTHERS GeoEngineers makes no warranties or guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided or compiled by others. The information presented in this report is based on the above - described research and limited site visits. GeoEngineers has relied upon information provided by others in our description of historical conditions and in our review of regulatory databases and files. The available data do not provide definitive information with regard to all past uses, operations or incidents at the site or adjacent properties. UNCERTAINTY REMAINS EVEN AFTER THIS PHASE I /PHASE II ESA STUDY IS COMPLETED No ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with a property. Performance of a Phase U Phase II ESA study is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for RECs in connection with a property. There is always a potential that areas with contamination that were not identified during this Phase I/Phase II ESA exist at the site or in the study area. Further evaluation of such potential would require additional research, subsurface exploration, sampling and/or testing. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ARE ALWAYS EVOLVING Some substances may be present in the site vicinity in quantities or under conditions that may have led, or may lead, to contamination of the subject site, but are not included in current local, state or federal regulatory definitions of hazardous substances or do not otherwise present current potential liability. GeoEngineers cannot be responsible if the standards for appropriate inquiry, or regulatory definitions of hazardous substance, change or if more stringent environmental standards are developed in the future. SITE/SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS CAN CHANGE This environmental report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. The findings and conclusions of this report may be affected by the passage of time (for example, a Phase I ESA report is typically applicable for 180 days), by events such as a change in property use or occupancy, by manmade events such as construction on or adjacent to the site, by new releases of hazardous substances, or by natural events, such as floods, earthquakes, slope instability or ground water fluctuations. Always contact GeoEngineers before applying this report so that GeoEngineers may evaluate reliability of the report to changed conditions. G e o En g i n e e r s G -2 File No. 8039 -003 -01- 1150/062901 MOST ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS ARE PROFESSIONAL OPINIONS Our interpretations of subsurface conditions are based on field observations and chemical analytical data from widely spaced sampling locations at the site. Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. GeoEngineers reviewed field and laboratory data and then applied our professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ — sometimes significantly — from those indicated in this report. Our report, conclusions and interpretations should not be construed as a warranty of the subsurface conditions. DO NOT REDRAW THE EXPLORATION LOGS Environmental scientists prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in an environmental report should never be redrawn for inclusion in other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. READ THESE PROVISIONS CLOSELY Some clients, design professionals and contractors may not recognize that the geoscience practices (geotechnical engineering, geology and environmental science) are far less exact than other engineering and natural science disciplines. This lack of understanding can create unrealistic expectations that could lead to disappointments, claims and disputes. GeoEngineers includes these explanatory "limitations" provisions in our reports to help reduce such risks. Please confer with GeoEngineers if you are unclear how these "Report Limitations and Guidelines for Use" apply to your project or site. GEOTECHNICAL, GEOLOGIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS SHOULD NOT BE INTERCHANGED The equipment, techniques and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical or geologic study and vice versa. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering or geologic report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Similarly, environmental reports are not used to address geotechnical or geologic concerns regarding a specific project. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION GeoEngineers' recommendations can be finalized only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. GeoEngineers cannot assume responsibility or liability for this report's recommendations if we do not perform construction observation. C i e o E n g i n e e r s G -3 File No. 8039 - 003 -01- 1150/062901 Sufficient monitoring, testing and consultation by GeoEngineers should be provided during construction to confirm that the conditions encountered are consistent with those indicated by the explorations, to provide recommendations for design changes should the conditions revealed during the work differ from those anticipated, and to evaluate whether or not earthwork activities are completed in accordance with our recommendations. Retaining GeoEngineers for construction observation for this project is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. G e o En g i n e e r s C -4 File No. 8039-003-01-1150/062901 Preston' Gates' Ellis LLP A LAW FIRM January 31, 2002 Mr. Bob Ormsby Museum of Flight Authority 9404 East Marginal Way South Seattle, WA 98108 -4097 Steven P. Rowe srowe @prestongates.c0m Re: Museum of Flight Expansion Project - Property Transfer Agreement Dear Bob: Enclosed is one an original Property Transfer Agreement for your files. The only revisions made to the agreement since it was signed were non - substantive changes revising the Site 3 legal description and adding tax parcel numbers and the agreement date to certain exhibits (see enclosed copy of blacklined revisions): These blacklines were previously e- mailed to you as well. For your convenience we have also enclosed two copies of the agreement. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, Steven ' Rowe SPR:hbvv Enclosures K\21173\88001 \SPR \SPR L2040 A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5000 SEATTLE, WA 98104 -7078 TEL: {206} 623 -7580 FAX: 1206) 623 -7022 www.prestongates.com Anchorage Coeur d'Alene Hong Kong Los Angeles Orange County Palo Alto Portland San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC Preston' Gates' Ellis LLP January 31, 2002 Ms. Heather Howard The Boeing Company 775 East Marginal Way MC13008 Seattle, WA 98108 -4000 Ms. Sally,G. Tenney Chief Deputy Prosecuting Attorney King County Prosecuting Attorney Civil Division, #E550 516 Third Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 -3212 Steven P. Rowe srowe@prestongates.com Re: Museum of Flight Expansion Project - Property Transfer Agreement Dear Heather and Sally: Enclosed for each of you is one original Property Transfer Agreement for your files. The only revisions made to the agreement since it was signed were non - substantive changes revising the Site 3 legal description and adding tax parcel numbers and the agreement date to certain exhibits (see enclosed copy of blacklined revisions). These blacklines were previously e- mailed to you as well. If you have any questions, please call. SPR:hbvv Enclosures cc: Bob Ormsby K:121173 \88001 \SPR \SPR L2042 Very truly yours, Steven ' Rowe A LAW FIRM I A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5000 SEATTLE, WA 98104 -7078 TEL: (206) 623 -7580 FAX: (206) 623 -7022 www.prestongates.com Anchorage Coeur d'Alene. Hong Kong Los Angeles Orange County Palo Alto Portland San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC Preston' Gates' Ellis LLP A LAW FIRM January 31, 2002 Mr. Steve Lancaster Planning Director City of Tukwila 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 Steven P. Rowe srowe @prestongates.com Re: Museum of Flight Expansion Project - Property Transfer Agreement Dear Steve: Enclosed is a copy of the Property Transfer Agreement for your files. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, SPR:hbvv Enclosures cc: Bob Ormsby K:\21173\88001 \SPR\SPR L2041 A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING OTHER LIMITED LIABILITY ENTITIES 701 FIFTH AVENUE, SUITE 5000 SEATTLE, WA 98104.7078 TEL: (206) 623 -7580 FAX: (2061 623 -7022 www.prestongates.com Anchorage Coeur d'Alene Hong Kong Los Angeles Orange County Palo Alto Portland San Francisco Seattle Spokane Washington, DC PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, AND THE BOEING COMPANY Dated: October 31, 2001 PROPERTY TRANSFER AGREEMENT THIS PROPERTY TRANSFER . AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is dated as of October 31,. 2001 and is by and between KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation (the "County "); KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority ( "KCMOFA "); MUSEUM OF FLIGHT FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "MOFF "); and THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ( "Boeing "). This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals A. The County created KCMOFA through Ordinance 7444 (December, 1985) as a public development authority under state law to assist with the development of a world class aviation museum called the Museum of Flight (the "MOF "). MOF is a unique and valuable aviation resource for the County and the greater Puget Sound area. MOF is one of the premier aviation museums in the United States, with a superior collection of planes, space artifacts, and archival documents. MOF was ranked as the region's number four tourist attraction in 1999 with 325,000 visitors. The MOF Core Facility (as defined below) is used as a first -class aviation museum and provides important public benefits, including education programs for over 100,000 participants, to County residents. B. MOFF operates the MOF. MOFF has identified a need to significantly expand MOF display and storage facilities to house some of the more important planes in the MOF collection, including the first Boeing 747 and an early Air Force One, as well as to expand MOF EXHIBIT 5 SITE 3 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) Washington, being a That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesteast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING True Point of Beginning of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence, along the Westerly Rright- of -Wway line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Rright-of Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest comer of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence; along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning SUBJECT TO ANY EXISTING EASEMENTS and TOGETHER WITH an . _„ _.Y Bein known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an EASEMENT easement for Aaccess and Uutility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West Exh. 5 -1 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly Rright -of -Wway line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein:described strip -of -land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Bright -of -Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment recorded under Recording No. (te-ho reeerled); THENCEThence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; THENCEThence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary . Line Adjustment the terminus of the herein - described centerline. EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the alternative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance No. 7444; or, in the alternative as aeronautical property as that term is defined by the Federal Aviation Administration in its Order 5190.6A, Airports Compliance Handbook. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ("Boeing"), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity of the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404 - 9002 -08 092304 - 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420- 1032 -01 000740 - 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. EXHIBIT 11 EXCHANGE PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Exchange Property) GRANTOR: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33, Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #: 542260- 0124 -07 THE GRANTOR, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, a Washington municipal corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. And reserving therefrom an aviation easement if required by the Federal Aviation Administration. EXHIBIT 13 SITE 3 PROPERTY DEED After Recording Return To: Preston Gates & Ellis LLP 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 5000 Seattle, WA 98104 -7078 Attn: Shannon J. Skinner BARGAIN AND SALE DEED (Site 3 Property) GRANTOR: THE BOEING COMPANY GRANTEE: KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY Legal Description: Abbreviated Form: Portion of Sec. 33., Twnshp 24 N, R4E, W.M. Additional legal on Exhibit A to document Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 562420- 1034 -09 THE GRANTOR, THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, as a charitable donation, bargains, sells and conveys to KING COUNTY MUSEUM OF FLIGHT AUTHORITY, a Washington public development authority, the following described real estate, situated in the County of King, State of Washington: See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to and excepting those matters listed in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and subject to the covenant described on Exhibit C attached hereto. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) • Washington, being a That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwesteast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING True Point of Beginning of the hereindescribed parcel of land; THENCEThence, along the Westerly Rright- of -Wway line of said East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Rright- of -Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence; along the North line of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002, recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001); Together with an EASEMENT easement for Access and Uutility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West Exh. 13 -A -1 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly Bright- of -Wway line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the ' _ . • 2, e - s - _ �� �� - True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein_described strip -of -land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Rright- of -Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of Lot C of said Boundary Line Adjustment- reeerded under Recording No. (to be recorded); THENCEThence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; THENCEThence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line Adjustment - - = ' -- - -: - . -. - . , being the terminus of the herein - described centerline. Exh. 13 -A -2 EXHIBIT C USE RESTRICTION COVENANT The real property described on Exhibit A to this Deed (the "Property ") is conveyed subject to the following covenant, which is hereby imposed on the Property pursuant to the terms set forth below. 1. Use Restriction. The Property shall at all times be used only for MOF Expansion Project purposes (as defined in the Property Transfer Agreement dated October 31, 2001 between King County, Washington, King County Museum of Flight Authority, Museum of Flight Foundation and The Boeing Company); or, in the alternative in a manner consistent with the air and space museum purposes as defined in King County Ordinance 7444. 2. Benefited Property. This covenant is for the benefit of The Boeing Company ( "Boeing "), as the grantor of the Property. Boeing owns substantial property in the vicinity of- the Property (as identified below, the "Boeing Property "), which is affected by the use of the Property. Boeing wants to assure the use of the Property does not adversely affect the Boeing Property. This covenant shall run with the land and burden the Property for the benefit of the Boeing Property so long as Boeing owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. The Boeing Property is identified by the King County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers listed below: 000160- 0020 -02 002200 - 0005 -09 218500- 0005 -08 282404 - 9009 -08 332404 - 9002 -08 092304 - 9155 -04 000340 - 0018 -09 562420- 1032 -01 000740 - 0033 -06 3. Enforcement. Boeing may enforce this covenant by obtaining injunctive relief or through other lawful means. 4. Modification; Termination. This covenant may be modified or terminated by mutual written agreement of Boeing and the owner of the Property. This covenant will automatically terminate at such time as Boeing no longer owns or occupies as a tenant any of the Boeing Property. To provide record notice of such termination, Boeing will promptly upon the request of the owner of the Property record a notice of such termination. Exh. 13 -C -1 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE 3 PROPERTY AND EXCHANGE PROPERTY Site 3 Property: REVISED LOT A (After Boundary Line Adjustment) of Washington, being a That portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 24 North, Range 4 East, Willamette Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 1145.85 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, North 89 °22'40" West 67.43 feet, to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNINGTrue Point of Beginning of the herein_described parcel of land; THENCEThence, along the Westerly Rright-of-Wway line of said East Marginal- Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, South 22 °32'07" East 465.83 feet, to the Southeast corner of the herein - described parcel of land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Bright- of -Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.67 feet, to the Southwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'53" West 720.27 feet, to the Northwest corner of the herein described parcel of land; THENCEThence; along the North line. of the properties described in Deed and recorded under King County Recording No. 8602280399, the following courses: 1) South 85 °46'07" East 476.88 feet; 2) South 89 °22'40" East 14.85 feet, to the True Point of Beginning SUBJECT TO ANY EXISTING EASEMENTS and T-OGETIER WITH an Bein known as Lot A of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment Number BLA -01 -002 recorded under Recording Number 20010803900001 _ Together with an EASEMENT easement for Aaccess and Uutility purposes, in, on, over, under, through and across a uniform strip -of -land 40.00 feet in width, 20.00 feet on both sides of the centerline described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Section 33; Thence, along the South line of Section 33, North 88 °04'58" West 1393.15 feet; Thence, along the (monumented) offset centerline of East Marginal Way South, North 22 °32'07" West 649.20 feet; Thence, leaving said offset centerline, South 63 °10'33" West 62.17 feet; Thence, along the Westerly Rright -of -Wway line of East Marginal Way South, parallel with and 62.00 feet Westerly from said offset centerline, North 22 °32'07" West 41.92 feet, to the ' _�_ ' • k ! _ _ �� �� ', _ True Point of Beginning of the centerline of the herein:described strip -of -land; THENCEThence, leaving said Westerly Rright- of -Wway line, South 62 °44'39" West 379.97 feet; THENCEThence, North 27 °23'35" West 321.20 feet, to the Southerly line of said Lot C of Boundary Line Adjustment recorded under Recording No. (te be recorded); THENCEThence, South 27 °23'53" East 321.20 feet; THENCEThence, South 62 °44'39" West 312.89 feet, to the West line of Lot B of Boundary Line • Adjustment being the terminus of the herein:described centerline. Exchange Property: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY MARGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST 324.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °33'49" EAST 132.01 FEET TO THE POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 88 °18'47" EAST 323.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 38,591 SQUARE FEET (0.89 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 14 -A -3 EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 24 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNE'.1F SAID SUBDIVISION, THENCE NORTH 88 °04'53" WEST 1314.13 FE AI LONG THE SOUTH LINE THEREOF TO THE NORTHEASTERLY • RGIN OF EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH; THENCE NORTH 67 °28'05" EAST 596.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 658.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 °18'47" WEST 230.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22 °33'49" WEST 129.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 96.74 FEET; TI :ENCE NORTH 28 °43'34" WEST 87.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 87 °56'41" WEST 392.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22 °43'59" EAST 82.54 FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS NORTH 87 °57'22" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 87 °57'22" EAST 305.33 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THE PARCEL DESCRIBED ABOVE CONTAINS 29,742 SQUARE FEET (0.68 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. SITUATE IN THE CITY OF TUKWILA, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON. Exh. 15 -D -1 08/28/01 RECEIVED FEB 19 2002 DEVE COMMUNITY TRAFFIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT MUSUEM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON 22588 curl= EXPIRES: S L 2-� 0 :3 May 2001 Prepared for: The Museum of Flight The Seneca Group DAVID I. HAMLIN AND ASSOCIATES 1319 DEXTER AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 270 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 (206) 285 -9035 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WASHINGTON BACKGROUND /PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this traffic impact assessment is to review and summarize the impacts associated with the expansion of the Museum of Flight. This report is submitted as an attachment to the City of Tukwila's Planned Action application for the project. An initial kick -off meeting with City of Tukwila Staff indicated concerns associated with the amount of parking needed for this expansion and intersection improvements that may be required. The existing Museum is located on the east side of East Marginal Way between S. 96th Place and S. 94th Place. (See Figure 1.) The Museum expansion will be on the north side of the existing building and across East Marginal Way to the northwest on an existing Boeing two -story office building site. A pedestrian sky- bridge will connect the existing museum with the new section on the west side of the street. A total of 356,000 square feet of space will be added to the Museum, 190,000 square feet to the existing building and 166,000 square feet across the street. Access to the Museum will be retained at S. 96th Place, however, the existing S. 94th Place access (at the "Red Barn ") will be closed and a new access developed at the north edge of the expansion. This new access is located about 350 feet north of the S. 94th Place access. Parking at the site will be revised to accommodate the expansion. The - existing 71 car stalls and four bus stalls on the north side of the building will be eliminated. The existing 303 stalls on the east side of the building will be modified and expanded. Overflow parking is also currently available to the south of the building where an old Air Force plane is located in a fenced area, and to the north of the north parking lot between East Marginal Way and the private aircraft hangars. Approximately 110 stalls are currently available in the south overflow parking area and 90 stalls in the north overflow area. Extensive field data for the existing conditions has been collected for this study in order to predict the impacts associated with the expansion. Historical attendance data was also available from the Museum for use in predicting peak demand. 1 Tasks included in this assessment were as follows: _ • Acquiring and reviewing historical museum attendance for use in establishing peak time periods. • Conducting daily (7 -day) and peak hour turning movement counts at critical locations and intersections to determine existing peak museum volumes versus peak street volumes on East Marginal Way. • Conducting parking surveys to determine current utilization. • Conducting vehicle occupancy studies. • Estimating additional traffic that will be generated by the expansion and distributing the new trips onto the adjacent roadways. • Conducting level of service analyses at critical intersections. • Estimating the parking supply needed to accommodate the expanded facility. • Determining the need for a traffic signal at the northerly access. The remainder of this assessment summarizes these areas of study. DATA COLLECTION An outside consultant, Trafficount, collected daily and peak hour traffic counts, vehicle occupancies, and parking data for this project. Seven -day mechanical counts were completed for the study at three locations. These mechanical counts were then used to determine the peak hours of the Museum and along East Marginal Way for a weekday and on the weekend. Weekday and weekend turning movement counts were then collected at the Museum accesses, along with average vehicle occupancies and parking utilization for both a weekday and weekend. EXISTING CONDITIONS Land Use Land use in the vicinity of the Museum of Flight includes the King County Airport immediately to the east, and a variety of Boeing facilities to the west. The area, in . general, is industrial in nature. 2 Existing Road Conditions East Marginal Way, is a multi -lane north -south arterial ranging from five to eight lanes. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk have been installed along both sides of the street and traffic signals control many of the intersections. East Marginal Way provides a primary access route to the Development Center and Boeing Plant 2. The surrounding area is primarily industrial in nature and the posted speed is 40 mph. S. 96`h Place extends eastward from East Marginal Way into the main parking area on the east side of the Museum. Curb and gutter have been installed plus a covered walkway and sidewalk on the south side of the street. The street provides access into the Museum parking and also to another parking area on the south side of the street that is used by Boeing and for overflow parking by the Museum. The intersection of S. 96th Place is controlled by a traffic signal at its intersection with East Marginal Way. S. 94th Place also extends eastward from East Marginal Way and provides access to the Museum parking lot located on the north side of the building (by the "Red Barn ") S. 94th Place turns into the parking area approximately 50 to75 feet east of East Marginal Way, just beyond the throat of the intersection. A north -south access road crosses S. 94th Place within this same area. The intersection of S. 94th Place is controlled by_a traffic signal at its intersection with East Marginal Way. Traffic Volumes Traffic count data collected for this study included daily traffic counts at three locations, plus peak hour turning movement counts at three intersections. The daily traffic counts included data for a Saturday through Friday, inclusive, starting on March 10th and ending on March 16th. The daily counts were conducted on East Marginal Way, S. 96th Place, and S. 94th Place. These count locations included the access on the south side of the Museum and the one at the north side near the Red Barn, plus East Marginal. Way just south of the Museum. The mechanical counts provided hourly data for a seven -day period, and summarized when the peak time periods were occurring. The weekday volumes along East Marginal Way were very consistent on the weekdays and averaged around 22,000 vehicles per day.. The weekend traffic on East Marginal Way was considerably less and shows the impact that employee traffic in the area has on the weekday volumes. The weekday peak hour typically occurred around 2:00 PM along East Marginal Way. The mechanical counts conducted at the Museum accesses differed from the count on East Marginal Way. The access volumes are generally higher on the weekend than on the weekdays, with the peak hour occurring slightly earlier, i.e., typically around noon 3 to 1:00 PM. Due to the configuration of the accesses and the inability to completely cordon off the Museum parking lots, some additional trips exiting the parking lots have been captured in the count data. These trips are associated with Boeing employees using a parking area to the south of the Museum. Access into this parking is available just to the east of the East Marginal Way /S. 96th Place intersection; however, exiting at this same location can be difficult if there is a queue at the intersection, so an access further to the east is used which was captured in the count area. It was also observed that some visitors to the Museum drove around the area more than once while deciding which parking lot to use and while viewing some of the aircraft. These visitors would have been counted as multiple trips, resulting in slightly higher counts than the actual amount of traffic generated. The following table summarizes the daily and PM peak hour volumes (and the times that they occurred) that were recorded at the three locations. Figure 2 shows the average of the weekday volumes and the Saturday volumes at the three count locations. 4 TABLE 1 DAILY COUNT SUMMARY E MW S/O S. 96111P1. COUNT LOCATIONS S. 96TH PL. E/O EMW S. 94T11 PL. E/O EMW SATURDAY (03/10/01) DAILY 12539 1186 535 PM PEAK SUNDAY (03/11/01) DAILY PM PEAK MONDAY (03/12/01) DAILY PM PEAK TUESDAY (03/13/01) DAILY PM PEAK WEDNESDAY (03/14/01) DAILY PM PEAK THURSDAY (03/15/01) DAILY PM PEAK FRIDAY (03/16/01) DAILY PM PEAK 1217 (02:00 PM) 7124 705 (01:45 PM) 21306 203 (01:15 PM) 75 (01:15 PM) 987 379 152 (01:00 PM) 47 (12:30 PM) 680 443 2074 (02:15 PM) 82 (01:15 PM) 50 (04:45 PM) 22112 601 514 1947 (02:00 PM) 93 (12:15 PM) 71 (12:45 PM) 22205 789 566 1968 (02:15 PM) 97 (12:00 PM) 59 (03:00 PM) 22222 843 574 2090 (02:00 PM) 103 (12:30 PM) 60 (12:15 PM) 20990 1088 607 1935(02:15 PM) 127 (12:00 PM) 65 (02 :3() PM) EMW — East Marginal Way Table 1 shows that the volumes recorded on the Museum access roads are significantly less than the volumes recorded along East Marginal Way. Furthermore, the peak periods for the Museum did not coincide with the peak hours along Marginal Way. Saturday volumes were the highest combined volumes for the Museum accesses, whereas the Saturday volume along East Marginal Way was less than 60% of the weekday average volume. Manual turning movement counts were conducted at three intersections along East Marginal Way, i.e., Boeing Access Road, S. 96th Place, and S. 94th Place. These counts were conducted on Saturday March 318L from 11:30 AM to 3:30 PM and on Thursday April 5th from 12:00 to 5:30 PM. Summaries of these counts are shown on 5 Figures 3 and 4. The turning movement counts were conducted for a time period longer than normal in order to capture both the peak hour along East Marginal Way and the peak hour at the Museum. The peak hour counts show the relatively minor amount of traffic on the side streets from which the Museum takes its access when compared to the volumes along East Marginal Way. The peak hour counts also show that Museum related traffic is about 50% higher on Saturday than on the weekday, however, peak hour traffic on East Marginal Way is about 50% lower on Saturday. Vehicle Occupancy Average vehicle occupancy studies were conducted on -site on Saturday March 31st and on Thursday April 5th from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM to provide a sampling of the number of visitors per vehicle (not including buses). The results of the vehicle occupancy studies showed the average occupancy to be 2.45 persons per vehicle on Thursday and 3.05 persons per vehicle on Saturday. The combined total showed the average occupancy to be 2.85 persons per vehicle overall. This value is very similar to Museum information that indicated an average group size of 2.9 persons entering the Museum. Parking Utilization In order to assess the parking demand for the expanded Museum, it was necessary to first evaluate the current parking supply and demand. Based on information provided by 'the Museum, Saturdays are typically the busiest day of the week, and Thursdays best represent the average weekday. Thursdays also have longer operating hours, and admission to the Museum is free in the evening on the first Thursday of the month. Parking survey forms were developed to assess the existing parking demand at the site. The surveys covered the hours of 10:00 AM to 5:00 PM inclusive on Saturday, March 31s`, and from 11:00 AM to 7:30 PM on Thursday, April 5th. Field personnel collected data at half -hour increments. The parking was "divided" into four areas that consisted of the main parking lots on the north and east sides of the building, plus the overflow parking areas to the north and south of the Museum. The last three digits of the vehicle license plates were recorded at half -hour increments. The south overflow parking area serves primarily as Boeing employee parking, whereas the north overflow serves,-,one of the airport hangar areas. The number of occupied parking stalls was summarized in half -hour increments for the two days and plotted on graphs. Figures 5 and 6 show the results of the parking demand on March 31s` and April 5t. The results show different peaking characteristics that are associated with the weekday versus the weekend. The weekday survey showed a peak occurring around noon, with visitations dropping off throughout the afternoon, then increasing again after 5:00 PM (during the free period), and peaking at 7:00 PM when a total of 281 parking stalls were occupied in the north and east lots combined. Up to 60 6 parking stalls in the east lot were fenced or coned off on this particular day to make room for a visiting F -18 from NASA. The highest combined use for the overflow lots to the north and south of the Museum was 60 stalls at 11:00 AM (of the over 200 stalls available). The use of the overflow parking decreased steadily after 11:00 AM. A small number of Museum employees and visitors were observed parking in the overflow lots; however, it is believed that most of these stalls were occupied by Boeing employees or visitors. The Saturday parking demand pattern was different from the weekday pattern. Parking demand increased steadily from the time the Museum opened until just after noon, peaking at 1:30 PM when 298 stalls were occupied, and then steadily decreasing through the reminder of the afternoon. Neither the north or south overflow lots were heavily used, with a combined high of 12 stalls used at any time during the survey. The Saturday parking demand was higher than the weekday demand, however, the total demand was about 80% of the current supply of 374 stalls (this percentage does not include overflow parking). Some general observations from the survey include the use of multiple stalls by Large RV's visiting the Museum, and the use of several stalls for trailer storage or miscellaneous equipment or fencing materials. This typically occurred near the perimeter of the east lot. Four stalls for bus parking are provided north of the north parking lot. These stalls were more heavily used on the weekday than on Saturday. Level of Service Capacity analyses for the peak hours were conducted at the three intersections along East Marginal Way in order to determine their current level of service on a weekday and weekend. These three intersections along East Marginal Way (S. 94th Place, S. 96th Place, and Boeing Access Road) are controlled by traffic signals. "Level of service" is a common term used in the Traffic Engineering profession that is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and its perception by motorists and /or passengers. These conditions are usually described in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six levels of service are designated, ranging from "A" to "F ", with level of service "A" representing the best operating conditions and level of service "F" the worst. The actual capacity of an intersection is generally considered to be at the lower end of level of service "E" and most agencies strive to maintain a roadway network that will not drop below this level of operation, except perhaps during unusual periods such as holiday shopping, sporting events, et cetera. 7 Calculations for the level of service analyses were conducted using the McTrans Highway Capacity Software version 3. ib based on the 1997 Highway Capacity Manual. The manual traffic counts described earlier were used in these analyses and are shown on Figure 2. The following table shows the current levels of service. TABLE 2 EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION WEEKDAY SATURDAY East Marginal Way/ EB - D (44 sec.) B (16 sec.) S. 94`h Place WB - D (42 sec.) B (16 sec.) NB- A(8sec.) A(8sec.) SB - A (8 sec.) A (8 sec.) OVERALL - B (11 sec.) A (9 sec.) East Marginal Way/ S. 96th Place East Marginal Way/ Boeing Access Road EB - D (41 sec.) WB - C (30 sec.) NB - C (25 sec.) SB - C (23 sec.) OVERALL - C (28 sec.) EB - E (58 sec.) WB - D (46 sec.) NB - D (52 sec.) SB - D (45 sec.) OVERALL - D (52 sec.) B (18 sec.) B (17 sec.) B (15 sec.) B (14 sec.) B (15 sec.) C (35 sec.) C (29 sec.) C (25 sec.) C (30 sec.) C (33 sec.) Where: LOS Delay A <10 seconds B >10 & < 20 seconds C >20 & < 35 seconds D >35 & < 55 seconds E >55 & < 80 seconds F > 80 seconds for signalized intersections Table 2 shows the level of service results for the weekday and Saturday peak hours. The results indicate that the weekday conditions are more critical than the weekend conditions with respect to level of service. The most critical intersection is East Marginal Way/ Boeing Access Road where traffic volumes are high on all legs of the intersection. In all cases, the overall intersection level of service is "D" or better. 8 FUTURE CONDITIONS General The expansion of the Museum of Flight is expected to increase yearly attendance by approximately. 50 %. The typical attendance pattern for the Museum is a fairly steady rate from September through May, with some peaking during holidays and school breaks. Beginning late spring /early summer through August, attendance increases about 40 %. Sea -Fair week attracts a much higher attendance that is associated with the presence of the Blue Angels. This is an unusual event and requires special parking and traffic control by the Museum. Additional parking at the Developmental Center and police officers to direct traffic are utilized during Sea -Fair and is handled on an "as- needed" basis. Thus, the critical need associated with the Museum expansion is the day - to -day operation that addresses the higher summertime attendance. Sea -Fair will continue to be a special once -a -year event that is best handled with police officers to direct traffic, as needed, plus the use of parking at the Developmental Center. The Museum Staff has estimated that about 90% of attendees arrive by automobile, with the remainder on buses (tours and students). Bus parking is currently available on -site, and a drop -off area for large groups is provided on the west side of the Museum. The Museum also hosts special events (private parties /receptions, sleepovers, etc.), about half of which occur after - hours. Seventy to eighty percent of these events involve fewer than 200 persons. A 500- person event may occur once a month. The Museum estimates. that about 75 % of special event attendees arrive by automobile, with the remainder in vans or buses. For example, a 200 - person event could involve 150 people arriving in automobiles (at 2.9 people per vehicle) plus one bus or five 10- person vans. The typical special events are planned activities and can be organized such that their presence does not create conflicts with the normal Museum hours. Special events will continue to be held at the Museum upon completion of the expansion. The new west gallery of the Museum will be able to support larger special events of over 1000 persons, and will include a drop -off area at its northeast corner. These large special events would likely be an activity associated with conventions being held in Seattle, and use vans and buses as the main mode of transportation to the site. In general, the main impacts from the Museum expansion will be the increase in the day-to- day operations as part of the increased attendance associated the expansion. The remainder of this report addresses the potential parking and traffic needs associated with the typical day -to -day impacts. Trip Generation /Distribution The ITE Trip Generation Manual (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 6th Edition, 1997) typically provides data with respect to the amount of traffic that will be 9 generated by a specific land use. However, a museum is a rather unusual type of use and no data is currently available in the Trip Generation Manual with respect to trip generation. Extensive field data has been gathered for this project including seven days of traffic count data at the Museum accesses. This hourly data has been summarized to provide an hourly breakdown of entering and exiting trips at the Museum on a weekday and on a Saturday. As noted in a previous section, some additional trips were captured in this data that are not associated with the Museum, however, the data provides a reasonable representation of current trip patterns. Museum staff had indicated that Saturdays are the busiest day of the week, and the count data confirmed that. Thursdays were noted as representing an average weekday, plus this is the one day of the week when the Museum has extended hours and therefore has been chosen as the typical weekday condition. A summary of the entering and exiting volumes at the Museum accesses for a Thursday and a Saturday have been summarized and attached in the Appendix. The summary notes (with an asterisk) the entering and exiting trips for the peak hour of the Museum versus the peak hour of the adjacent street. The peak hour of the Museum occurs one to two hours prior to the peak hour on East Marginal Way and generates about 12% more traffic during this time period than during the peak hour of the adjacent street. The occurrence of the peak hour of the Museum in the early afternoon and prior to the street peak hour is reasonable given that visitors to the Museum are typically on vacation and would avoid peak traffic hours as much as possible. Seasonal variations also affect the amount of traffic generated by the Museum. The count data collected in March represents about 70% of the number of visitations that typically occur during the summer months. Table 3 summarizes the trip generation for a typical weekday and on the weekend for both the data collected in March, along with the estimated values during the peak tourist season. 10 TABLE 3 EXISTING TRIP GENERATION MUSEUM OF FLIGHT TIME PERIOD OFF -PEAK SEASON PEAK SEASON* WEEKDAY Daily 1417 2024 Peak Hour of Museum In 72 103 Out 74 106 Total 146 209 Peak Hour of Street In 42 60 Out 88 126 Total 130 186 SATURDAY Daily 1729 2470 Peak Hour of Museum In 129 184 Out 127 181 Total 256 365 Peak Hour of Street In 116 166 Out 111 159 Total 227 325 * Estimates for peak season volumes assume off - season volumes are approximately 70% of the peak season: Table 3 shows the estimated trip generation for the existing conditions at the Museum. As noted earlier, yearly attendance at the Museum is expected to increase approximately 50 % upon completion of the expansion. In order to determine the impacts associated with the proposed expansion, the trip generation shown in Table 3 for a weekday and weekend during the peak and off -peak season has been assumed to increase proportionally. Table 4 summarizes the expected trip generation using this assumption. TABLE 4 ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TIME PERIOD OFF -PEAK SEASON PEAK SEASON WEEKDAY Daily 2126 3036 Peak Hour of Museum In 108 154 Out 111 159 Total 219 313 Peak Hour of Street In 63 90 Out 132 189 Total 195 279 SATURDAY Daily 2594 3705 Peak Hour of Museum In 194 276 Out 190 272 Total 384 548 Peak Hour of Street In 174 249 Out 166 237 Total 340 486 The net increase in the trip generation resulting from the Museum expansion is shown in Table 5. 12 TABLE 5 TRIP GENERATION NET INCREASE MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TIME PERIOD OFF -PEAK SEASON PEAK SEASON* WEEKDAY Daily +709 + 1012 Peak Hour of Museum In +36 +51 Out +37 +53 Total +73 +104 Peak Hour of Street In +21 +30 Out +44 +63 Total +65 +93 SATURDAY Daily +865 +1235 Peak Hour of Museum In +65 +92 Out +63 +91 Total +128 +183 Peak Hour of Street In +58 +83 Out +55 +78 Total +113 +161 The trip generation summary'shows that the Museum expansion could add an additional 65 to 93 trips onto the adjacent street system during the street peak hour depending on the season of the year. On a Saturday, the expansion could result in an additional 113 to 161 trips on the adjacent street system during the street peak hour. The new trips generated by the expansion will initially be distributed to the north or south on the adjacent street, i.e. East Marginal Way, with further dispersion to the regional facilities. Many of the trips associated with the Museum are expected to be recreational or tourist - related and therefore coming from I -5. Other trips, such as deliveries and employee trips could be expected to use some of the other facilities in the 13 area such as Pacific Highway South, Interurban Avenue, SR -509, et cetera. A review of the eight hours of turning movement counts conducted at the S. 96'h Place and S. 94th Place accesses showed for both a weekday and a Saturday a combined split of approximately 35 % of the traffic to /from the north and 65 % to /from the south. Figures 7 and 8 show the estimated range of weekday and Saturday peak hour trips during the peak hour of the adjacent street. The range of values represents the off -peak and peak seasons. The trips associated with the peak hour of the adjacent street (rather than the Museum peak hour) have been shown since this would be the most critical time period with respect to the operation and levels of service at the adjacent intersections. Of the traffic traveling to and from the south, most of it is expected to be destined to and from I -5. Traffic Volumes The turning movement volumes at S. 94'h Place would change considerably with the expansion. The turning movement count at S. 94th Place has been modified to eliminate any movements associated with the east leg of the intersection since this leg would be eliminated with the expansion, plus a portion of the Museum traffic would use the west leg of the intersection. A new "T" intersection would be constructed approximately 350 feet to the north of S. 94''' Place and would be located on. the north end of the site. This would serve as a general access to the Museum, plus also be used as an occasional crossing area when moving aircraft between the east and west sides of the Museum. Traffic patterns at the S. 96th Place access are expected to be similar to current conditions with the exception of some increases on the east leg that are associated with the expansion. The estimated weekday and Saturday PM peak hour traffic volumes have been shown on Figures 9 through 12 for the peak and off -peak seasons. These volumes have been estimated using the trip assignments shown on Figures 7 and 8. No background traffic growth increases were made to the existing volumes shown on Figures 3 and 4 since these volumes are expected to remain relatively stable, although an upward adjustment in the Museum volumes was made to reflect existing peak season volumes where appropriate. Historical data shows similar daily volumes along East Marginal Way over the past two decades, typically ranging in the low to mid - twenty thousand vehicles per day, fluctuating mainly with employment levels at Boeing. Level of Service The weekday and Saturday peak hour volumes shown on Figures 9 through 12 were used to calculate the levels of service at the four intersections shown on these figures. For these analyses, the new north Museum access was assumed to consist of two westbound approach lanes (i.e. separate right and left -turn lanes) and controlled by a traffic signal. 14 The operation of the S. 94th Place intersection was assumed to remain the same except for the elimination of the east leg and the addition of a small proportion of Museum trips. The following tables show the resultant levels of service for a weekday and Saturday for the peak (summer) and off -peak (non- summer) seasons. TABLE 6 FUTURE PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE PEAK (SUMMER) SEASON LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION WEEKDAY SATURDAY East Marginal Way/ WB - D (43 sec.) B (17 sec.) New Access NB - A (8 sec.) A ( 8 sec.) SB - A (5 sec.) A (4 sec.) OVERALL - A (7 sec.) A (7 sec.) East Marginal Way/ S. 94t} Place East Marginal Way/ S. 96`h Place East Marginal Way/ Boeing Access Road EB - D (45 sec.) NB- A(4sec.) SB - A ( 8 sec.) OVERALL - A (10 sec.) EB - D (41 sec.) WB - D (37 sec.) - NB - C (25 sec.) SB - C (24 sec.) OVERALL - C (28 sec.) EB - E (58 sec.) WB - D (45 sec.) NB - D (53 sec.) SB - D (49 sec.) OVERALL - D (53 sec.) B (17 sec.) A (4 sec.) A ( 8 sec.) A(7sec.) B (18 sec.) B (19 sec.) B (15 sec.) B (14 sec.) B (16 sec.) C (35 sec.) C (27 sec.) C (25 sec.) C (34 sec.) C (33 sec.) 15 TABLE 7 FUTURE PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE OFF -PEAK (NON - SUMMER) SEASON LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) LOCATION WEEKDAY SATURDAY East Marginal Way/ WB - D (43 sec.) B (16 sec.) New Access NB - A ( 8 sec.) A ( 8 sec.) SB - A (5 sec.) A( 4 sec.) OVERALL - A (7 sec.) A (7 sec.) East Marginal Way/ EB - D (45 sec.) B (16 sec.) S. 94th Place NB - A (4 sec.) A (4 sec.) SB-A(8 sec.) A (8 sec.) OVERALL - A (9 sec.) A (7 sec.) East Marginal Way/ EB - D (41 sec.) B (18 sec.) S. 96th Place WB - C (31 sec.) B (18 sec.) NB - C (25 sec.) B (15 sec.) SB - C (23 sec.) B (14 sec.) OVERALL - C (28 sec.) B (15 sec.) East Marginal Way/ EB - E (58 sec.) C (35 sec.) Boeing Access Road WB - D (45 sec.) C (28 sec.) NB - D (52 sec.) C (25 sec.) SB - D (46 sec.) C (32 sec.) OVERALL - D (52 sec.) C (33 sec.) Where: LOS Delay A <10 seconds B >10 & < 20 seconds C >20 & < 35 seconds D >35 & < 55 seconds E >55 & < 80 seconds F >80 seconds for signalized intersections The capacity analyses for the future conditions show very little change from the existing conditions, even with the seasonal adjustments and with the expected attendance increase. This is due the large amount of excess capacity available along East Marginal Way and its ability to serve a large volume of traffic associated with shift change peaks in this largely industrial area. The additional trips associated with the Museum are a small fraction of the total volumes along East Marginal Way and create only a minor impact. 16 As noted earlier, the new access on the north side of the expanded facility was analyzed as a signalized intersection, which resulted in an overall level of service "A" for all cases. The volumes are expected to be relatively low, and a traffic signal may not be needed. An additional set of calculations was performed to determine if side street stop sign control would provide an adequate level of service at this access. The following table shows the projected levels of service at this new access under stop sign control. TABLE 8 FUTURE PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE NEW ACCESS /EAST MARGINAL WAY (STOP SIGN CONTROL) CONDITION Peak Season (Summer) Off -Peak Season (Non- Summer) LEVEL OF SERVICE (DELAY) WEEKDAY SATURDAY WBLT - B (14 sec.) B (11 sec.) WBRT - B (10 sec.) A (9 sec.) SBLT- A(9sec.) A(8sec.) WBLT - B (13 sec.) WBRT - B (10 sec.) SBLT - A (9 sec.) B (11 sec.) A(9sec.) A ( 8 sec.) Where: LOS Delay A <10 seconds - B >10 & < 15 seconds C >15 & < 25 seconds D >25 & < 35 seconds E >35 & < 50 seconds F >50 seconds for unsignalized intersections The results of the capacity analyses, assuming stop sign control at the new Museum access, indicate that the intersection could operate adequately without the aid of a traffic signal. This analysis also assumes that the two -way left -turn lane on East Marginal Way is used as a storage /merge area by the left -turns exiting the Museum. Parking Adequate parking to serve the expected increase in attendance is a critical issue. The site plan for the expanded facility shows a total of approximately 610 stalls, an increase of about 235 parking stalls. Approximately 500 of these stalls are located in the parking lot on the east side of East Marginal Way, and approximately 110 are located on the west side of East Marginal Way around the new west wing. Existing parking north of the Red Barn will be eliminated, and the main parking lot on the east side of the Museum will be 17 expanded. With respect to the existing overflow parking, approximately 35 to 40 parking stalls in the north overflow /hangar parking lot that parallels East Marginal Way will be eliminated. Parking in the south overflow lot will increase by over 50% once the Air Force plane currently stored in this area is relocated into the expanded Museum facility. As noted earlier, some overflow parking was occupied during the peak parking demand. The amount of occupied parking in the overflow lots was very small (i.e., 9 stalls during the Saturday peak) and it not known how much of it was associated with the Museum versus the hangars or Boeing. The net number of overflow parking stalls available will increase slightly with the expansion due to the removal of aircraft from the south overflow lot. The use of overflow parking by the Museum does not appear to be extensive during the peak parking demand period and therefore is not a major factor in determining the needed number of stalls. A previous section discussed an expected increase of yearly attendance of 50 %, which would also result in an increased parking demand. The parking studies completed for this assessment showed an existing peak demand of just under 300 stalls on a Saturday afternoon. Information provided by the Museum showed that attendance during the week when the Saturday information was collected was about 72 % of the weekly average attendance during the peak (summer) season. Factoring_ for the seasonal attendance plus the expected 50% increase in attendance results in an estimated peak parking demand of approximately 625, about 15 more than the available parking shown on the site plan (not including overflow parking). A minimum of at least 660 stalls is recommended to provide adequate parking for the . peak season demand plus a 5% contingency. During most times of the day and most of the year, excess parking will be available on -site that can be used as aircraft staging areas. Continued agreements with Boeing and King County are recommended for use of the north and south overflow lots so that they will be available peak summer demand and for unusual peaks such as those associated with Sea -Fair. Circulation Current traffic circulation patterns at the Museum will be modified somewhat as part of the expansion. The S. 96th Place access will essentially stay the same, as will the school bus drop -off and delivery access that parallels East Marginal Way (although this lane will be extended to the north about 350 feet). The existing N. 94th Place access at the north end of the Museum will be eliminated (on the east side only) with a new north access located approximately 350 feet further north. This new access will function in much the same manor as the existing S. 94'h Place access does with respect to Museum traffic, although it will also be used when moving aircraft across East Marginal Way between the east and west sides of the Museum. (It is anticipated that when aircraft is moved there will be special traffic control provided during this type of event and that it would 18 occur during non -peak traffic periods.) A drop -off area will also be provided on the east side of the Museum at the main entry, with the main parking area located immediately to the east of the drop -off. The layout of the expanded parking area will be similar to the existing layout except that additional parking will be extended further north. There will be occasional periods when portions of the main parking lot will be used for visiting aircraft or staging areas. This is currently done at the Museum and typically involves coning or fencing off areas of the parking lot as needed. A third drop -off area will be provided near the northeast corner of the west gallery for special events held at the gallery. A one -way entry located across from the new north access will loop around an aircraft display area and drop visitors off at the special events entry. This access will have limited use during most days of the week. Pedestrian traffic associated with the Museum will primarily be contained on -site. A. sky- bridge will connect the east and west galleries so there will be no compelling reason for pedestrians to cross East Marginal Way between the two wings. However, there will always be the occasional visitor who will choose to view the outside displays separately and cross East Marginal Way to gain access to these displays. Pedestrian signal indications are provided at the existing traffic signal at S. 94th Place, and it is assumed that this traffic signal will be retained to serve Boeing plus miscellaneous Museum traffic. Thus, pedestrians will have a place to cross at a controlled intersection and sidewalks are available on both sides of East Marginal. Way. CONCLUSIONS The proposed expansion of the Museum of Flight is expected to generate additional traffic as a result of increased attendance. The expansion will also provide the Museum with the opportunity to host large special events. These large special events would likely be an activity associated with conventions being held in Seattle, and use vans and buses as the main mode of transportation to the site. Impacts associated with special events will continue to be best handled on an as- needed basis such as the special traffic control that occurs during Sea - Fair. In general, the main impacts from the Museum expansion will be the increase in the day -to -day operations as part of the increased attendance associated the expansion. Attendance at the Museum is currently much heavier on the weekends than on weekdays, and summer attendance is much higher than during the non - summer months, although there are peaks throughout the year associated with holidays or school breaks. This pattern is expected to continue with the expansion. 19 The Museum expansion will have a very minor traffic impact on the adjacent streets. The peak traffic generated by the Museum will not be coincident with the peak hour of the adjacent streets. The Museum traditionally generates its highest attendance on Saturdays when traffic on the adjacent streets is considerably lower. The extensive traffic count data collected for this assessment confirms this pattern. The adjacent streets have been designed to serve the peak shift breaks associated with the industrial nature of the area. Thus, the impacts from the Museum are complementary to the street system since the Museum's main impacts occur during the non -peak hours of the street. Three existing intersections along East Marginal Way were analyzed with respect to level of service for this assessment and are expected to operate at level of service "D" or better for all conditions reviewed. Two of these intersections, i.e., S. 96'h Place and S. 94th Place currently provide access to the Museum. The third intersection, Boeing Access Road /Pacific Highway South, is the major intersection along this corridor and therefore the most sensitive to any increase in traffic volumes. Other signalized intersections along East Marginal Way located to the north and south of the Museum were not analyzed since most of these serve as an access to Boeing facilities and were not considered to be critical with respect to their operating conditions or impacts from the Museum when compared to the three that were analyzed. The results of the level of service analyses for the intersections show that the Museum had only a nominal impact at the most critically impacted intersections. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that other intersections further from the site would not experience any adverse impacts of significance. A new intersection to East Marginal Way will be constructed as part of the expansion and will be located about 350 feet north of S. 94th Place. The east leg of the S. 94th Place intersection will be eliminated and the new intersection will essentially replace the east leg of S. 94th Place and serve as the second access to the Museum. Capacity analyses were conducted for this new intersection for both signalized and unsignalized control. The results of the analyses indicate that this new "T" intersection could operate adequately without the installation of a traffic signal since the volumes will be relatively low and a two -way left -turn lane is available along East Marginal Way for use as a storage /merge lane for exiting left- turns. Adequate parking supply at the Museum is a critical component of the expansion. There are approximately 375 stalls currently available on -site, with approximately 200 more available to the north and south for overflow parking. Based on the parking surveys completed for this assessment, approximately 625 stalls will be needed to accommodate the peak demand during the summer peak with the expected attendance increase. A minimum of 660 stalls is recommended to provide a 5% contingency, and agreements with King County and Boeing should be continued to provide for peak demand and for overflow parking. 20 RECOMMENDATIONS The following describe the recommendations resulting from analyses completed for this assessment of the Museum of Flight expansion. • Construct the new Museum access with two approach (westbound) lanes and install a stop sign to control the westbound movement at its intersection with East Marginal Way. • Provide a minimum of 660 parking stalls through on -site parking and overflow parking agreements to accommodate the demand during the peak summer months and the increase associated with the expansion. • Continue the parking agreements with Boeing and King County to use the parking areas north and south of the Museum for overflow parking. • Provide the appropriate revisions to the existing traffic signal at S. 94th Place /East Marginal Way (including any channelization revisions) to operate as a "T" intersection from the existing four legged intersection. • Install pedestrian crossing prohibition signs on the east and west sides of East Marginal Way at the new access, and install "use crosswalk" with directional arrow signs to guide pedestrians to the S. 94th Place crosswalks. 21 NORTH EfIIG.1I 11amli Wu INIV,,INAEOPMEgoa Amax 111111ilie DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES PROJECT ‘XONOTY M FOGURE 1 P MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSIO PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -1 NORTH EING ACCESS RD. XXXXX XXXXX - AVERAGE OF WEEKDAY VOLUMES - SATURDAY VOLUMES EXOSTONG DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES LY TR;.,,FF C VOLUMES FOGURE 2 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSIO PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -2 NORTH 14 2 2 13 293 1t ,►18 313 03/31/01 1:30 -2:30 PM • EING ACCESS RD. 03/31/01 03/31/01 1:30 -2:30 PM - 1:45 -2:45 PM 16 1182 4 263 98 33 EXOSTON G S DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TURD ¥ PE 1» K HOUR VOLUMES LUMES ., FOGURE 3 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -3 NORTH 04/05/01 2:15 -3:15 PM EING ACCESS RD II 04/05/01 04/05/01 :15 -3:15 PM \ 4:15 -5:15 PM EXOSTONG WEEKD DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES PE,-,K HOUR VOLUMES FUG° RE 4 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSIO PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -4 VEHICLES PARKED 390 360 330 300 270 240 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 CURRENT SUPPLY - 374 STALLS PEAK ACCUMULATION - 298 VEHICLES AT 1:30 PM TOTAL PARKING EAST & NORTH LOTS 10:00 AM TOTAL OVERFLOW PARKING I I I I I I IIIII� NOON 2:00 PM 4:00 PM TIME II 6:00 PM SATURDAY (MARCH 311ST) PARGO1!O ACCMMMMLATOON FOOMRC 5 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES I MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WA. PAG E F -5 VEHICLES PARKED 390 360 - 330 - 300 - 270 - 240 - 210 - CURRENT SUPPLY - 374 STALLS PEAK ACCUMULATION - 281 VEHICLES AT 7:00 PM TOTAL PARKING �- EAST & NORTH LOTS 180 - 150 - 120 - 90 - 60 30 - 0 TOTAL PARKING - EAST LOT TOTAL PARKING - NORTH LOT TOTAL OVERFLOW PARKING I I I I I I I 1 I I I 11:00 AM 1:00 PM 3:00 PM 5:00 PM TIME THURSDAY W° Y (APRILS 5TH) PARXIING ACCUMULATION MIMEO I ( I 7:00 PM DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES I MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WA. PAGE F -6 NORTH 15/22 XX /XX - OFF - PEAK /PEAK SEASON TRIP ASSIGNMENT XX% - TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT ESTOMATED WEEKDP, Y (STREET) PE OFF-PE,-,K/PE,-,K SE FOGURE 7 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES °/ K HOUR TROP SONS , ., SSOGNMENT MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -7 NORTH 19/27 XX /XX - OFF- PEAK /PEAK SEASON TRIP ASSIGNMENT XX% - TRIP DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT ESTOM (STREET) PE OFF -PE ,., , TED p ®5;., T®URD,°,Y{±�p �p K HOUR TROP ,- ,SSOGNMENT K /PE;., K SEASONS FIGURE 8 14/20 DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -8 NORTH 358 7 25 2 317 13 4 18 330 EING ACCESS RD. FUTURE ESTOM DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TED S TURD,-,Y PE (NON-SUMMER SE,-,,SON) FOGURE 9 11 58 124 1...4(4-136 195 K HOUR VOLUMES MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION, PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -9 NORTH 118 16 398 3 40 361 61 21 312 �r26 338 5.941" OF N �L = .p y9 A 408 21 378 4 297 98 33 40 96SH 9' S•N tiaOS S. `c 0 128 462 169 132 FUTURE ESTOM DAVID 1. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES SR -99 1 -5 .• • St 382 16 J\ 366 14 46 324 32 28 - V 352 EING ACCESS 296 158 560 783 107 391 •A RD.! 380 404 270 11 61 124 1136 198 798 TED S TURD,-.1r9 PEi' K HOUR VOLUMES (SUMMER E S ''SON) FIGURE 10 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION TUKWILA, WA. PAGE F -10 916 NORTH \--.-19 22 897 47 25 511 �15 526 EING ACCESS RD SR -99 FUTURE RE ESTOM DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TED WEEK®,°, Y PE (NON- SUMMER SE SON) F GURE 11 K HOUR VOLUMES MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSIO PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -11 NORTH 1 -5 921 22 110 514 88 21 4 535 SR -99 •AI ACCESS RD.- 122 399 3 ` X446 571 FUTURE ESTOM DAVID I. HAMLIN & ASSOCIATES TED WEEK®, », U PE;" iO HOUR VOLUMES LUMES (SUMMER SE/m,SON) FOGURE 12 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSIO PAGE TUKWILA, WA. F -12 APPENDIX • • • • • 1 ; ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ti !tell! ii! I.; • , ".. — • 1.111d .1.1.1,4.ar r: I 1 2 6 eXONO/Ir lre • W. 4,4 r 44; • .1, ••• - _ TTITTITTITn-rmi , ! n.‘ , . i . , ,,,,,, ■ ■ p.• t s - — — ' , • ''''' -- --— ------.. \ • •• I/ , .. / /. / 7 . ,//c •''' / / • // / , / ' • 0 / %, / ' /C '')/ •:' / ' P / ei / if-ruin-ft/HID , . ,Faznyirm.var-7,-.4...11m..wori,-, re_xt.m.,v3rwrif.:0?..i..linl,,; 'ho:Pt?o...Phetie`Oe..Ke al, ' • ' - ' ' Ammo vo Era v., ', 1111 im At.."4MISIMEr.z4:::41;0...'4,egir.-07,.....,,,- ' • , '' / / / ,.1. / / i,. Y .. / i / 1 4-4 , / „,, . / / / / .4 / / / . /.44/ / , / WHIliffilli.) I (-222",!//2//27.72/_71Z7,/tM/LY-').- , 4 ,_ • AO,. Mai --11616ii■ .. / / / / / / ..- UITT11-1-111.111.11111;1:11.:-.11;i411:17/ • „..rp-rnTryffr r1111-11-1!-Fririt1111 , ,..,-4 1 A • . •, , / / , --y ,," / / , / / / / / ;:::::: ''''' --- i ..._. 1 _,2.-...---:..--p....,4:4,:t,-,:- b ' / • . / / ■ I / / / . 111. '''' 111 i) El _nil= 1111 71 TIT71111] TIMIITCLIII 7:7 - -27,1, T11 I= TELM rirri n filar . : -.‘ I ..e. -4 * - 4,... / . i \ n[11111 III 11 1 ' 1 .1 fl ITTITITITHT-1 HT .:// ei. , . . 1 IIITFITITFDT11,!•1' --1'7_'1.)--:_il:;\\" ' : ____ /t • ,1t 1_1111t1H111,11 1111.,11_JIH1.11; 111 ') 11::11111:111111111 111:1J/I 1,1 Fr rum rril I III (V, .• _1111 1.1 tk, 121 r T • 2: nbbj 100rella■••71•001161010 0.0.0001010, 0001.110,104 Ewan ka0101Co000,3 001I0 Amy Ws VW WO Ma /10.018100 0.11 10010VAN101 &SUANIU 11100.0001:00 Mel %law Or0p Com Sadr.,001001001101 la0.0.10,00.00* 000 MOM 132.,0 Itd0s n001)10400 10..0010102 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 . PI •11•‘: ; • 1.04, f(11,,t C..40 ,,,100, I 100, 11.1.,113.1■■■ • ••,—) •■■ -- SI1E PLAN 1 ALL SECTORS • 20 G. A100 TABLE A -1 ENTERING & EXITING TRIPS AT MUSEUM ACCESSES SATURDAY THURSDAY START 96TH PL. 94TH PL. TOTAL 96TH PL. 94TH PL. TOTAL TIME IN/OUT IN/OUT IN/OUT IN/OUT IN/OUT IN /OUT 12 AM 1/0 0/4 1/4 0/2 0/2 0/4 1 AM 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 2 AM 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/1 1/1 3 AM 0/0 1/0 1/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 4 AM 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0 1/0 1/0 5 AM 0/0 1/1 1/1 1/1 4/0 5/1 6 AM 1/0 0/5 1/5 6/6 8/8 14/14 7 AM 11/5 21/4 32/9 45/11 , 34/11 79/22 8 AM 35/14 16/7 51/21 23/14 23/8 46/22 9 AM 47/8 21/11 68/19 42/15 28/9 70/24 10 AM 91/17 23/13 114/30 52/18 23/14 75/32 11 AM 75/49 23/18 98/67. 43/34 19/24 62/58 12 PM 76/74 28/36 104/100 41/50 31/24 72/74* 1 PM 99/99 30/28 129/127* 34/48 24/31 58/79 2 PM 77/85 39/26 116/111 ** 23/62 19/26 42/88 ** 3 PM 25/74 20/38 45/112 19/37 10/36 29/73 4 PM 15/105 7/22 22/127 19/32 22/24 41/56 5 PM 8/68 7/40 15/108 18/51 6/32 24/83 6 PM 3/16 5/18 8/34 15/22 5/12 20/34 7 PM 10/6 5/6 15/12 5/24 5/5 10/29 8 PM 5/4 1/2 6/6 3/8 4/11 7/19 9 PM 0/0 2/0 2/0 1/16. 3/18 4/34 10 PM 0/1 3/0 3/1 0/0 4/3 4/3 11 PM 0/0 1/2 1/2 1/1 0/1 1/2 * - Peak hour of Museum. ** - Peak hour of adjacent street. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON S 94TH PL E/O E MARGINAL WAY LOC# 3 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Lacey, Washington 98503 360 -491 -8116 Site Code : 000030000 Start Date: 03/05/2001 File I.D. : DHA07603 Begin Mon. 03/05 Tues. W wed. Thur. Fri. 12:00 am 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 pm 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 Totals * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sat. Sun. Wee W: W: 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 5 21 4 16 7 21 11 1 23 13 1 23 18 1 * * 28 36 1 * * 30 28 2 * * 39 26 1 * * 20 38 1 * * 7 22 * 7 40 1 * * 5 18 1 * * 5 6 * * 1 2 * * 2 0 * * 3 0 * * 1 2 0 0 254 281 17 0 535 2 0 0 1 0 0 5 2 1 15 1 6 1 10 2 12 1 17 2 19 2 20 2 12 1 23 29 7 1 2 1 13 6 6 208 21 379 Avg. 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 11 8 12 15 26 24 23 25 22 34 12 4 2 6 3 4 242 453 Avg. Day .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 120.3% 116.1% 81.0% 85.9% AM Peaks 10:00 11:00 10:00 08:00 10:00 11:00 Volume 23 18 17 15 20 15 PM Peaks 02:00 05:00 01:00 05:00 01:00 05:00 Volume 39 40 23 29 26 34 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON S 94TH PL E/0 E MARGINAL WAY LOC# 3 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Lacey, Washington 98503 360 -491 -8116 Begin Mon. 03/12 Tues. Wed. Thur. Fri. 'u- W' 12:00 am 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 2 3 1 1 1 1 . 3 2 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 04:00 3 2 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 05:00 2 4 2 1 2 0 4 0 4 0 06:00 12 9. 10 7 7 8 8 8 9 7 07:00 18 9 31 7 22 5 34 11 37 11 08:00 25 5 30 3 42 9 23 8 32 6 09:00 33 15 16 4 18 15 28 9 22 16 10:00 16 18 18 10 27 25 23 14 24 18 11:00 28 27 34 29 23 15 19 24 36 40 Sat. Site Code : 000030000 Start Date: 03/05/2001 File I.D. : DHA07603 Page 2 Sun. Week Avg. W * * * * 0 1 * * * * 0 0 * * * 1 * * * * 0 0 * * * * 1 1 * * * * 3 1 * * * * 9 8 * * * * 28 9 « * * * 30 6 * * * * 23 12 * * * 22 17 « * * 28 27 1 12:00 pm 10 17 31 28 20 25 31 24 18 32 * * * * 22 25 01:00 11 15 35 35 21 28 24 31 30 20 * * * 24 26 02:00 14 18 11 11 19 28 19 26 26 36 * * * * 18 24 03:00 13 21 14 21 28 31 10 36 16 31 * * * * 16 28 04:00 10 26 4 45 12 27 22 24 15 42 * * * 13 33 05:00 5 37 9 38 6 34 6 32 4 35 * * * * 6 35 06:00 1 3 2 7 3 9 5 12 1 12 * * * * 2 9 07:00 1 3 2 5 7 3 5 5 1 0 * * * * 3 3 08:00 0 0 0 0 1 9 4 11 0 2 * * * * 1 4 09:00 4 2 1 0 1 16 3 18 4 4 * * * * 3 8 10:00 2 0 2 0 4 2 4 3 2 1 * * * * 3 1 11:00 1 3 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 4 * * * * 1 2 Totals 209 234 256 258 267 299 274 300 286 321 0 0 0 0 257 281 443 514 566 574 607 0 0 538 Avg. Day 81.3% 83.2% 99.6% 91.8% 103.8% 106.4% 106.6% 106.7% 111.2% 114.28 .08 .08 .08 .08 AM Peaks 09:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 07:00 11:00 07 :00 11:00 08:00 11:00 Volume 33 27 34 29 42 25 34 24 37 40 30 27 PM Peaks 02:00 05:00 01:00 04:00 03:00 05:00 12:00 03:00 01:00 04:00 01:00 05:00 Volume 14 37 35 45 28 34 31 36 30 42 24 35 ADTs SEATTLE, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY S S/0 S 96TH PL LOC# 01 Begin Time 12:00 am 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 ' 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 pm 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 Totals Avg. Day AM Peaks Volume PM Peaks Volume Mon. NB 03/05 Tues. SB NB * * + + + + + + + + Wed. NB TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Site Code : 000010000 Lacey, Washington 98503 Start Date: 03/05/2001 360 -491 -8116 File I.D. : DHA07401 Paaa 1 Thur. Fri. Sat. NB SB NB SB NB SB * * * * 65 84 * * * 31 77 * * * 35 39 * * * * 26 30 * * * 85 23 * * * * 305 54 + * * * 277 143 * * * * 263 229 * * * * 298 244 * * * * 316 284 * * * 335 365 * * * * 397 499 Sun. Week Avg. NB SB NB SB 92 124 78 104 64 111 48 94 48 84 42 62 31 22 28 26 59 22 72 22 215 30 260 42 125 50 201 96 130 58 196 144 111 82 204 163 180 116 248 200 238 154 286 260 265 214 331 356 * * * * * * * * * 395 606 302 260 348 433 * * * * * * * * * 370 676 314 298 342 487 * * * * * * * * * 370 847 297 395 334 621 * * * * * * * * * 244 694 226 353 235 524 * * * * * * * * 188 631 177 295 182 463 * * * * * * * * 191 526 148 254 170 390 * * * * * * * * 120 435 135 173 128 304 * * * * * * * * * 122 284 91 114 106 199 * * * * * * * 101 230 60 92 80 161 * * * * * * * * * 101 206 108 106 104 156 * * * * * * * * 96 298 90 81 93 190 * * * * * * * * 80 224 42 88 61 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4811 7728 3548 3576 4177 5653 0 0 0 0 0 12539 7124 9830 .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 115.1% 136.7% 84.9% 63.2% 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 397 499 265 214 331 356 12:00 02:00 01:00 02:00 12:00 02:00 395 847 314 395 348 621 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON TRAFFICOUNT, INC. E MARGINAL WAY S S/O 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Site Code : 000010000 S 96TH PL Lacey, Washington 98503 Start Date: 03/05/2001 LOC# 01 360 - 491 -8116 File I.D. : DHA07401 Paae . 2 Begin Mon. 03/12 Tues. Wed. Thur. Fri. Sat. Sun. Week Avg. Time NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 12:00 am 39 45 39 72 42 70 52 87 44 79 * * * 43 71 01:00 37 37 36 56 40 51 42 68 51 62 * * * 41 55 02:00 32 38 35 38 28 46 44 45 34 58 * • * * 35 45 03:00 72 34 92 32 80 35 65 36 83 33 * * * * 78 34 04:00 280 34 302 56 265 38 290 37 286 40 * * 285 41 05:00 996 122 1013 103 961 96 951 83 844 100 * * * * 953 101 06:00 1186 202 1200 223 1252 238 1230 258 1113 214 * * * * 1196 227 07:00 1132 352 1333 351 1249 386 1311 307 1181 338 * * * * 1241 347 08:00 1021 417 953 406 1122 397 1013 363 844 404 * * * * 991 397 09:00 684 476 775 480 685 492 818 420 685 414 * * * 729 456 10:00 566 519 622 584 617 553 629 508 587 559 * * * * 604 545 11:00 661 819 743 825 706 823 696 782 696 838 * * * * 700 817 12:00 pm 792 602 816 713 827 677 867 683 825 756 * * * * 825 686 01:00 677 754 725 766 707 726 626 808 721 799 * * * * 691 771 02:00 642 1408 599 1348 594 1345 681 1409 633 1282 * * 630 1358 03:00 447 1345 473 1279 484 1357 450 1384 453 1245 * * * * 461 1322. 04:00 399 1254 '350 1282 436 1215 416 1216 360 1076 * * * * 392 1209 05:00 324 851 360 891 368 959 346 914 299 799 * * * * 339 883 06:00 185 493 215 487 221 519 204 502 187 399 * * * * 202 480 07:00 166 206 123 237 162 240 159 263 185 248 * * * 159 239 08:00 99 132 114 169 97 196 103 217 142 151 * * * * 111 173 09:00 116 114 125 151 108 162 122 148 118 162 * * * * 118 147 10:00 90 136 97 146 93 144 111 162 105 164 * * * * 99 150 11:00 58 215 40 237 59 237 59 237 75 219 * * * * 58 229 Totals 10701 10605 11180 10932 11203 11002 11285 10937 10551 10439 0 0 0 0 10981 10783 21306 22112 22205 22222 20990 0 0 21764 Avg. Day 97.4% 98.3% 101.8% 101.3% 102.0% 102.0% 102.7% 101.4% 96.0% 96.8% .0% .0% .0% .0% AM Peaks 06:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 06:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 Volume 1186 819 1333 825 1252 823 1311 782 1181 838 1241 817 PM Peaks 12:00 02:00 12:00 02:00 12:00 03:00 12:00 02:00 12:00 02:00 12:00 02:00 Volume 792 1408 816 1348 827 1357 867 1409 825 1282 825 1358 ADTs SEATTLE, WASHINGTON TRAFFICOUNT, INC. S 96TH PL E/O 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Site Code : 000020000 E MARGINAL WAY Lacey, Washington 98503 Start Date: 03/05/2001 LOC# 2 360 -491 -8116 File I.D. : DHA07602 Page • 1 Begin Mon. 03/05 Tues. Wed. Thur. Fri. Sat. Sun. Wee Avg. Time EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB E WB 12:00 am * * * * * * * * * 1 0 0 0 0 01:00 * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 1 0 02:00 * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 1 0 0 04:00 * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 * * * * * * * * * * 1 0 3 3 2 07 :00 * * * * * * * * * * 11 5 4 4 4 08:00 * * * * * * * * * * 35 14 8 3 2 8 09:00 * * * * * * * * * 47 8 33 7 4 8 10:00 * * * * * * * * * * 91 17 68 12 8 14 11:00 * * * * * * * * * 75 49 76 28 7 38 12:00 pm * * * * * * * * * 76 64 85 52 8 58' 01:00 * * * * * * - * * * 99 99 91 61 9 80 02:00 * * * * * * * * * 77 85 57 73 6 79 03:00 * * * * * * * * * * 25 74 35 99 3 86 04:00 * * * * * * * * * * 15 105 17 80 1 92 05:00 * * * * * * * * * 8 68 10 54 61 06:00 * * * * * * * * * 3 16 1 14 15 07:00 * * * * * * * * * * 10 6 2 2 4 08:00 * * * * * * * * * * 5 4 0 0 2 09:00 * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 3 2 10:00 * * * * * * * * * * 0 1 0 0 0 11:00 * * * * * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 579 615 491 496 53 553 0 0 0 0 0 1194 987 1088 Avg. Day .0% .0% .0% s .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% .0% 108.2% 111.2% 91.7% 89.6% AM Peaks 10:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 11:00 Volume 91 49 76 28 80 38 PM Peaks 01:00 04:00 01:00 03:00 01:00 04:00 Volume 99 105 91 99 95 92 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON S 96TH PL E/0 E MARGINAL WAY LOC# 2 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 Yelm Hwy B -195 Lacey, Washington 98503 360 -491 -8116 Site Code : 000020000 Start Date: 03/05/2001 File I.D. : DHA07602 Begin Mon. 03/12 Tues. Wed. Thur. Time EB WB GB WB GB WB EB 12:00 am 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 06:00 10 5 7 4 6 4 6 6 14 8 07:00 16 7 25 15 21 - 6 45 11 81 10 08:00 27 14 19 5 69 14 23 14 37 17 09:00 43 14 22 12 51 17 42 15 45 21 10:00 40 17 37 15 38 18 52 18 67 37 11:00 53 38 36 24 47 45 43 34 76 97 Fri WB EB 2 WB 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Sat. EB Week WB EB * 0 Avg. WB 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 5 38 10 35 13 41 16 47 21 51 48 12:00 pm 30 50 33 50 43 54 41 50 46 81 * * * 39 57 01:00 36 40 32 49 26 49 34 48 45 61 * * * * 35 49 02:00 26 35 16 44 16 51 23 62 29 74 * * * * 22 53 03:00 16 46 14 27 15 41 19 37 33 63 * * * * 19 43 04:00 13 40 4 35 15 61 19 32 13 49 * * * * 13 43 05:00 1 34 3 36 9 42 18 51 6 45 * * * * 7 42 06:00 2 4 2 10 5 9 15 22 6 4 * * * * 6 10 07:00 1 5 2 8 5 4 5 24 4 2 * * * 3 9 08:00 0 3 0 2 2 5 3 8 0 5 * * * * 1 5 09:00 0 0 2 5 0 7 1 16 2 7 * * * 1 7 10:00 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 * * * * 1 1 11:00 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 * * * 0 1 Totals 319 361 256 345 368 428 391 452 505 583 0 0 0 0 369 436 680 601 796 843 1088 0 0 805 Avg. Day 86.4% 82.8% 69.3% 79.1% 99.7% 98.1% 105.9% 103.6% 136.8% 133.7% .0% .0% .0% .0% AM Peaks 11:00 11:00 10:00 11:00 08:00 11:00 10:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 Volume 53 38 37 24 69 45 52 34 81 97 51 48 PM Peaks 01:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 04:00 12:00 02:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Volume 36 50 33 50 43 61 41 62 46 81 39 57 ADTs EATTLE, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY 94TH PLACE Roc # 2 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY File Name : DHA09002M Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No : 1 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Total 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM Total 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM Total 03:00 PM 03:15 PM Grand Total Apprch % Total % 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0.6 0.3 77 69 62 75 283 57 89 78 88 312 85 89 83 80 337 56 60 1176 95.8 48.4 4 5 1 2 12 3 2, 7 0 12 0 2 3 2 7 4 2 44 3.6 1.8 8 8 4 3 23 5 0 1 4 10 3 4 2 2 11 3 2 54 81 74 63 77 295 65 91 85 90 331 85 91 86 82 344 60 62 1227 50.5 0 4 1 4 9 1 2 1 2 6 7 4 3 0 14 4 1 39 42.4 1.6 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 5 12 2 2 2 5 11 0 6 3 3 12 O 2 O 5 4 49 4.3 53.3 0.2 2.0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 4 9 23 3 4 5 7 19 7 10 6 3 26 6 6 92 3.8 3 4 1 3 11 0 4 7 3 14 6 2 5 1 14 66 73 76 55 270 50 67 78 65 260 76 74 63 62 275 3 57 2 50 57 1026 5.2 94.0 2.3 42.2 2 0 1 1 4 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 0.8 0.4 4 3 3 1 11 3 1 0 1 5 5 1 1 4 11 5 1. 40 71 77 78 59 285 51 71 87 68 277 82 76 68 63 289 62 52 1092 44.9 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 1 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 13 3 3 68.4 15.8 15.8 0.5 0.1 0.1 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 3 1 7 0 0 8 1 1 19 0.8 12 11 7 4 34 8 1 1 6 16 8 5 3 6 22 8 3 95 153 161 145 147 606 121 167 177 165 630 175 184 160 148 667 129 121 2430 3.8 96.2 Start Time E MARGINAL WAY From North Right 1 Thru I Left I App. Total S 94TH PLACE • From East Right 1 Thru I Left I App. Total E MARGINAL WAY From South S 94TH PLACE From West 165 172 152 151 640 129 168 178 171 646 183 189 163 154 689 137 124 2525 Right l Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Right Thru I Left 1 App. Total Int.Total 1 Peak Hour From 11:30 AM to 03:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 01:30 PM Volume Percent 02:15 Volume Peak Factor High Int Volume Peak Factor 2 0.6 0 340 96.9 89 02:15 PM 0 89 9 2.6 2 Peak Hour From 11:30 AM to 03:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 By Approach 01:45 PM Volume 2 345 Percent 0.6 98.0 1.4 High Int 02:15 PM Volume 0 89 Peak Factor 2 5 2 351 91 91 0.964 352 91 0.967 14 48.3 4 02:15 PM 2 6.9 0 13 44.8 6 29 10 4 0 6 10 0.725 01:45 PM 16 53.3 02:15 PM 4 O 14 30 0.0 46.7 O 6 10 0.750 18 5.8 2 293 93.6 74 2 0.6 0 01:30 PM 7 78 2 01:30 PM 18 293 2 5.8 93.6 0.6 01:30 PM 7 78 2 313 76 87 0.899 313 87 0.899 7 87.5 6 0 0.0 0 02:15 PM 6 0 01:30 PM 7 87.5 02:15 PM 6 0 0.0 1 12.5 1 1 12.5 8 7 7 0.286 8 0 1 7 0.286 0.952 701 184 EATTLE, WASHINGTON MARGINAL WAY I94TH PLACE OC # 2 DHA01073TMP S 94TH PLACE From East Right 1 Thru I Left 1 App. Total E MARGINAL WAY From South Right I Thru I Left 1 App. Total S 94TH PLACE From West Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Int Total 1 9 2.6 2 351 91 0 89 2 91 0.964 14 48.3 4 02:15 PM 2 6.9 0 13 44.8 6 29 10 4 0 6 10 0.725 18 5.8 2 293 93.6 74 01:30 PM 7 78 2 0.6 0 2 313 76 87 0.899 7 87.5 6 0 0.0 0 1 12.5 1 8 7 02:15 PM 6 0 1 7 0.286 E MARGINAL WAY In I 308 .i r1511 659 Right Thru Left 1 o North 3/31/01 1:30:00 PM 3/31/01 2:15:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total E MARGINAL WAY CO m 1;)z 0.952 701 184 IEATTLE, WASHINGTON EAST MARGINAL WAY 94TH PLACE C # 2 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360 -491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY File Name Site Code Start Date Page No EAST MARGINAL WAY From North S 94TH PLACE From East EAST MARGINAL WAY From South S 94TH PLACE :DHA09502M :00000002 :04/05/2001 :1 909 265 265 0.858 909 265 0.858 14 38.9 5 03:00 PM 0 0.0 0 22 61.1 4 36 9 3 0 7 10 0.900 03:45 PM 21 56.8 04:15 PM 10 0 16 37 0.0 43.2 0 7 17 0.544 14 2.7 1 493 95.0 124 02:15 PM 5 131 12 2.3 2 5 01:15 PM 9 551 30 1.5 93.4 5.1 01:15 PM 3 148 5 519 127 141 0.920 590 156 0.946 68 86.1 15 0 0.0 0 02:15 PM 23 0 11 13.9 4 2 79 19 25 0.790 02:15 PM 68 0 11 79 86.1 0.0 13.9 02:15 PM 23 0 2 25 0.790 1543 0.918 420 111EATTLE, WASHINGTON EAST MARGINAL WAY 94TH PLACE 110C # 2 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 File Name : DHA09502M Site Code : 00000002 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 3 EAST MARGINAL WAY From North Start Time Right I Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total �eak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 02:15 PM Volume 4 891 14 Percent 0.4 98.0 1.5 02:45 Volume 1 261 3 Peak Factor High Int. 02:45 PM Volume 1 261 3 Peak Factor S 94TH PLACE From East Right I Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total EAST MARGINAL WAY From South S 94TH PLACE From West Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Int Total 1 909 265 265 0.858 14 38.9 5 03:00 PM 0 0.0 0 22 61.1 4 36 9 3 0 7 10 0.900 14 493 12 519 68 0 2.7 95.0 2.3 86.1 0.0 1 124 2 127 15 0 02:15 PM 02:15 PM 5 131 5 141 23 0 0.920 0 VD-1- 2 F h EAST MARGINAL WAY Out 1 5181 Ri ht Thru Left North 4/5/01 2:15:00 PM 4/5/01 3:00:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total FAST MARGINAI WAY 2 2 m x 11 13.9 4 79 19 2 25 0.790 1543 420 0.918 ,EATTLE, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY 1196TH PLACE 1110C # 1 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY File Name : DHA09001M Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No : 1 E MARGINAL WAY From North S 96TH PLACE E MARGINAL WAY From East From South S 96TH PLACE From West Volume Percent High Int Volume Peak Factor 3 370 108 108 0.856 370 108 0.856 35 30.4 10 01:45 PM 1 0.9 1 79 68.7 17 115 28 12 0 20 32 0.898 01:30 PM 35 30.4 01:45 PM 12 1 79 115 0.9 68.7 0 20 32 0.898 80 21.3 14 263 69.9 73 01:30 PM 25 72 33 8.8 13 5 01:30 PM 80 263 33 21.3 69.9 8.8 01:30 PM 25 72 5 376 100 102 0.922 376 102 0.922 98 83.1 38 02:00 PM 34 02:00 PM 115 88.5 02:00 PM 34 4 3.4 0 3 16 13.6 3 5 3 12 2.3 9.2 118 41 42 0.702 130 3 5 42 0.774 0.884 979 277 1 EATTLE, WASHINGTON MARGINAL WAY 96TH PLACE OC # 1 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 File Name : DHA09001M Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No : 2 E MARGINAL WAY From North S 96TH PLACE From East E MARGINAL WAY From South S 96TH PLACE From West StartTlme Right 1 Thru I Left I App. Total Right 1 Thru I Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Int Total I Peak Hour From 11:30 AM to 03:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 01:30 PM Volume 9 345 16 Percent 2.4 93.2 4.3 02:15 Volume 4 101 3 Peak Factor High Int 02:15 PM Volume 4 101 3 Peak Factor 370 108 108 0.856 35 30.4 10 01:45 PM 1 0.9 1 79 68.7 17 115 28 12 0 20 32 0.898 80 263 33 376 98 4 21.3 69.9 8.8 83.1 3.4 14 73 13 100 38 0 01:30 PM 02:00 PM 25 72 5 102 34 3 0.922 E MARGINAL WAY Right Thru Left North 3/31/01 1:30:00 PM 3/31/01 2:15:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total F MARGINAL WAY 16 13.6 3 118 41 5 42 0.702 0.884 979 277 IEATTLE, WASHINGTON EAST MARGINAL WAY 96TH PLACE OC # 1 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360 -491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY File Name : DHA09501M Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 1 EAST MARGINAL WAY From North S 96TH PLACE EAST MARGINAL WAY From East From South S 96TH PLACE From West liri Start Time Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Exclu. Total Inclu. Total InL Total Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 By Approach Volume Percent High Int Volume Peak Factor 02:30 PM 16 952 19 1.6 96.5 1.9 03:00 PM 6 285 4 968 295 295 0.820 987 295 0.836 24 4 42 34.3 5.7 60.0 7 1 13 21 70 03:00 PM 7 1 13 21 0.833 04:30 PM 19 19.0 04:45 PM 2 4 77 100 4.0 77.0 0 32 34 0.735 23 4.4 5 440 84.3 112 59 11.3 8 02:15 PM 7 120 33 12:00 PM 48 488 205 6.5 65.9 27.7 12:15 PM 13 116 63 522 125 160 0.816 741 192 0.965 457 84.0 102 02:30 PM 132 4 0.7 2 83 15.3 18 0 27 544 122 159 0.855 02:15 PM 457 4 83 544 84.0 0.7 15.3 02:30 PM 132 0 27 159 0.855 2104 0.934 563 EATTLE, WASHINGTON EAST MARGINAL WAY 96TH PLACE OC # 1 DHA01073TMP A TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 File Name : DHA09501M - Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 3 EAST MARGINAL WAY From North Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total S 96TH PLACE From East EAST MARGINAL WAY From South S 96TH PLACE From West Start Time leak Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 02:15 PM Volume 20 933 Percent 2.1 96.4 03:00 Volume 6 285 Peak Factor High int. 03:00 PM Volume 6 285 Peak Factor Right 1 Thru 1 Left I App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Right 1 Thru 1 Left 1 App. Total Int Total 1 15 1.5 4 4 968 295 295 0.820 24 4 42 34.3 5.7 60.0 7 1 13 21 70 03:00 PM 7 1 13 21 0.833 23 440 4.4 84.3 5 112 59 11.3 8 02:15 PM 7 120 33 522 125 160 0.816 457 4 83 544 84.0 0.7 15.3 102 2 18 122 02:30 PM 132 0 27 159 0.855 EAST MARGINAL WAY T North 4/5/01 2:15:00 PM 4/5/01 3:00:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total • EAST MARGINAL WAY c 2104 0.934 563 1UKWILA, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY /SR 99 PACIFIC HWY S OEING ACCESS RD OC # 3 DHA01073TMP E MARGINAL WAY From North TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY BOEING ACCESS RD E MARGINAL WAY From East From South File Name : DHA09003M Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No :1 SR 99 /PACIFIC HWY S From Southw Start Time 0.714 197 27.2 66 404 55.7 107 02:15 PM 66 107 124 725 17.1 36 209 36 209 0.867 01:30 PM 220 410 112 742 29.6 55.3 15.1 02:15 PM 66 107 36 209 0.888 136 70.8 42 55 28.6 12 1 0.5 1 192 55 02:15 PM 42 12 1 55 0.873 12:30 PM 145 48 74.0 24.5 1.5 01:15 PM 38 22 1 3 196 61 0.803 11 2.0 10 391 70.2 91 151 27.1 37 4 557 0.7 1 139 02:00 PM 1 108 43 3 155 0.898 12:15 PM 2 436 153 8 599 0.3 72.8 25.5 1.3 12:45 PM 1 124 38 0 163 0.919 2175 0.933 583 KWILA, WASHINGTON MARGINAL WAY /SR 99 PACIFIC HWY S lEING ACCESS RD C # 3 DHA01073TMP TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 File Name : DHA09003M Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No : 2 Percent 02:15 Volume Peak Factor High Int Volume Peak Factor 701 02:30 PM 99 31 116 246 0.712 197 27.2 66 404 55.7 107 02:15 PM 66 107 124 725 17.1 36 209 36 209 0.867 136 55 70.8 28.6 42 12 1 0.5 1 02:15 PM 42 12 1 192 55 55 0.873 11 2.0 10 391 70.2 91 02:00 PM 1 108 151 27.1 37 4 557 0.7 1 139 43 3 155 0.898 E MARGINAL WAY l Thru Thru Left Rh ht 1 L, 1 North 3/31/01 1:45:00 PM 3/31/01 2:30:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total E MARGINAL WAY r 2175 0.933 583 IUKWILA, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY /SR 99 PACIFIC HWY S OEING ACCESS RD OC # 3 DHA01073TMP E MARGINAL WAY From North TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Groups Printed- PRIMARY BOEING ACCESS RD E MARGINAL WAY From East From South File Name : DHA09503M Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 1 SR 99 /PACIFIC HWY S Time Volume Percent High Int Volume Peak Factor 0.861 744 331 729 1804 41.2 18.3 40.4 02:30 PM 176 99 212 487 0.926 161 793 399 1353 11.9 58.6 29.5 43 248 122 413 04:45 PM 43 248 . 122 413 0.819 04:30 PM 195 879 439 1513 12.9 58.1 29.0 05:15 PM 67 239 123 429 0.882 446 78.4 117 120 21.1 17 05:00 PM 119 37 04:15 PM 446 120 78.4 21.1 0.5 05:00 PM 119 37 3 0.5 0 569 134 2 158 0.900 3 569 2 158 0.900 1 0.1 0 600 76.9 148 04:15 PM 1 146 02:15 PM 2 0.2 02:15 PM 0 172 22.1 39 7 780 0.9 0 187 50 4 201 0.970 568 245 15 830 68.4 29.5 1.8 132 80 4 216 0.961 4328 1125 0.962 'UKWILA, WASHINGTON E MARGINAL WAY /SR 99 PACIFIC HWY S OEING ACCESS RD C # 3 DHA01073TMP Hour From 12:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 04:15 PM Volume 676 296 Percent 41.6 18.2 04:45 Volume 164 80 Peak Factor High Int 04:30 PM Volume 187 92 Peak Factor TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 File Name : DHA09503M Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 3 E MARGINAL WAY From North BOEING ACCESS RD From East E MARGINAL WAY From South SR 99 /PACIFIC HWY S From Southwest StartTime Thru Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left Left App. Total Right Thru Hard Left App. Total Hard Right Thru Right Thru Left Truck App. Total Int Total 654 1626 40.2 147 391 193 472 0.861 161 11.9 43 793 58.6 248 04:45 PM 43 248 399 1353 29.5 122 413 122 413 0.819 446 78.4 117 120 21.1 17 05:00 PM 119 37 3 0.5 0 569 134 2 158 0.900 1 600 172 7 780 4328 0.1 76.9 22.1 0.9 0 148 39 0 187 1125 0.962 04:15 PM 1 146 50 4 201 0.970 T V SR 99 /PACIFIC S E MARGINAL WAY 211 11U/yl Thru Thru Lrft Ryht 1 �, North 4/5/01 4:15:00 PM 4/5/01 5:00:00 PM PRIMARY Out In Total E MARGINAL WAY 4 r 4 r rm � s 0 O m n c0i • TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Directions Printed: Unshifted File Name : DHA09005M Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 03/31/2001 Page No : 1 1 OCC 1 2 OCC I 3 OCC I 4 OCC I 5 OCC 1 6 OCC 1 7 OCC 1 8 OCC I 9 OCC 1 10 0CC 1 11 OCC 1 12 OCC 1 13 OCC I 14 0CC 1 15 OCC 1 16+ OCC I 4 9 3 5 0 4 11 2 4 1 5 15 7 7 1 4 7 4 7 2 17 42 16 23 4 6 11 1 6 2 3 2 4 24 11 4 1 5 3 13 0 . 0 2 5 6 4 5, 20 7 6 4 6 23 5 4 3 6 18 3 3 4 3 13 2 2 5 1 10 43 109 57 13.3 33.6 17.6 2 5 6 4 17 3 6 .4 5 18 4 0 7 1 12 70 21.6 6 0 2 3 11 0 0 1 2 3 0 3 1 1 5 23 7.1 2 1 0 1 4 2 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 12 3.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Int. Total 1 23 24 36 25 108 32 17 17 23 89 19 16 19 19 73 15 11 18 10 54 324 Start Time I 1OCC 1 2OCC I 3OCC 1 4OCC 1 5OCC I Peak Hour From 11:00 AM to 02:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Occurred: 11:15 AM Volume Percent 16.2 6 OCC 1 7 OCC 1 8 occ 1 9 OCC I 10 0CC I 11 OCC I 12 OCC 1 13 occ 1 14 OCC 1 15 0CC 1 16+ OCC I Int. Total I High Int.11:30 AM 19 44 18 20 10 4 1 1 0 37.6 15.4 17.1 8.5 3.4 0.9 0.9 0.0 Volume 5 15 PHF 0.813 7 1 0 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 117 0 36 - - • • • Start Time 1 1 occ 1 2 occ 1 3 occ 1 4 occ 1 5 occ 1 TRAFFICOUNT, INC. 4820 YELM HWY B -195 LACEY, WASHINGTON 98503 360- 491 -8116 Directions Printed: Unshifted File Name : DHA09505M Site Code : 00000005 Start Date : 04/05/2001 Page No : 1 6OCC 1 7000 1 8OCC 1 9OCC 1 100CC 1 11OCC 1 12OCC 1 13OCC 1 14OCC 1 15OCC 1 16 +OCC 1 11:OOAM 7 5 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 7 3 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 5 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 11:45 AM 8 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 27 12 7 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:OOPM 5 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 6 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 18 9 4 8 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 PM 4 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 PM 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 PM 2 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 PM 0 3 0 1 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 7 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 PM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 PM 3 2 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 PM 3 2 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 PM 2 1 . 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 5 4 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 65 33 17 35 10 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total % 39.4 20.0 10.3 21.2 6.1 2.4 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Start Time 1 10CC 1 2 OCC 1 3 OCC 1 4 OCC 1 5 OCC 1 6 OCC 1 7 OCC 1 8 OCC 1 9 OCC 1 10 OCC 1 110CC 1 12 OCC 1 13 OCC 1 14 OCC 1 15 OCC 1 16+ OCC Peak Hour From 11:00 AM to 02:45 PM . Peak 1 of 1 Peak Occurred: 11:00 AM Volume Percent High Int.11:00 AM 27 12 7 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42.2 18.8 10.9 20.3 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume 7 PHF 0.762 5 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Int. Total 1 21 20 12 11 64 14 12 9 8 43 10 7 7 4 28 3 10 9 8 30 165 Int. Total 1 64 0 21 0.08 0.167 42.4 0.06 0.167 42.2 0.04 0.758 4.0 0.25 0.675 7.7 0.03 0.758 3.8 A 4844 0.32 .0.675 8.1 A Intersection Delay = 10.8 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B 44.4 42.3 7.6 8.1 D A A IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:Xs94emw 'Inter: S. 94TH PL. /EMW Analyst: GR IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:Fsw94emw "Inter: S. 94TH PL. /EMW Analyst: GR Ipso. Lanes IlLGConfig Volume ane Width TOR Vol Eastbound L T R HCS: Page 1 Signals Release 3.1b City /St: TUKWILA, WA. Proj #: Period: FUTURE WEEKDAY SUMMER PEAK N/S St: E. MARGINAL WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION SUMMARY Westbound Northbound L T R L T R 1 L 22 12.0 Duration 0.25 0 1 R 88 12.0 0 Ihase Combination Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds B Right B Right Green e11ow 11 Red ycle Length: EB �e �pr/ ane Grp 1 A A 0" 0 0 1 2 0 L T 21 514 12.0 12.0 Area Type: All other areas Signal Operations 2 3 4 20.0 4.0 0.0 120.0 secs Intersection Lane Group Capcity lastbound 298 Adj Sat Flow Rate (s) Southbound L T R 0 3 0 TR 921 9 12.0 0 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 8 A A A A 6.0 4.0 0.0 Performance Summary Ratios Lane Group A A 81.0 5.0 0.0 Approach v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1787 267 1599 stbound dorthbound ' 343 2512 3312 uthbound 3268 4841 0.09 0.167 42.5 D 0.42 0.167 45.8 D 45.1 0.07 0.758 4.2 A 0.22 0.758 4.3 A 4.3 0.33 0.675 8.2 A 8.2 D A A Intersection Delay = 9.8 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:Fss94emw Inter: S. 94TH PL. /EMW Analyst: GR 603 1739 4969 8 0.06 0.267 16.5 B 0.34 0.267 18.2 B 18.0 0.26 0.00 0.09 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.06 0.167 0.31 0.350 0.03 0.583 0.24 0.350 17.8 B 16.1 B 16.6 B 21.1 C 14.4 B 5.5 A 13.9 B 17.4 15.0 13.5 B B B B Intersection Delay = 15.1 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B 553 1740 1262 0.42 0.267 19.0 B 1900 0.00 0.267 16.1 B 1615 0.10 0.267 16.7 B 3433 0.06 0.167 21.1 C 3376 0.39 0.350 14.9 B 0.04 0.583 5.6 A 4971 0.26 0.350 14.0 B 18.0 18.5 15.4 13.6 B B B B Intersection Delay = 15.5 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = B HCS- Signals 3.1b File:Fww96emw "Inter: S. 96TH PL. /EMW Analyst: GR Date: 05/15/01 IIE/W St: S. 96TH PLACE HCS- Signals 3.1b File:Fws96emw ,Inter: S. 96TH PL. /EMW Analyst: GR 'Date: 5/15/01 E /W St: S. 96TH PLACE HCS- Signals 3.1b File:Xwboeacc "Inter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR IDate: 4/10/01 /W St: BOEING ACCESS /PAC. HWY. HCS: Signals Release 3.1b 3402 0.62 0.064 69.2 E 52.3 1524 0.83 0.393 47.7 D 892 3467 0.85 0.257 57.4 E 484 1881 0.71 0.257 52.1 D 44.5 D 1306 2814 0.60 0.464 28.7 C Intersection Delay = 51.8 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = D E D D IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:Xsboeacc Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1b IlInter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW City St: TUKWILA W A. Analyst: GR ' Prof #: ' Date: 4/10/01 Period: SATURDAY PEAK E/W St: BOEING ACCESS /PAC. HWY. N/S St: E. MARGINAL WAY IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:FSWBOEACC HCS: Signals Release 3.1b 'Inter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR Date: 05/15/01 E/W St: BOEING ACCESS /PAC. HWY. 0.63 0.064 69.8 E 52.5 D 0.83 0.393 47.7 D 892 3467 0.93 0.257 66.0 E 484 1881 0.72 0.257 52.7 D 48.7 D 1306 2814 0.61 0.464 28.8 C Intersection Delay = 53.2 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = D HCS- Signals 3.1b File:FSSBOEACC 'Inter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR NB Left Thru Right -Peds SB Left Thru Right Peds EB Right WB Right 5 6 7 A A A A A A A A 20.0 19.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Performance Summary Adj Sat Ratios Lane Group Approach Flow Rate (s) v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 8 3467 0.23 0.220 32.2 C 3560 0.57 0.220 35.8 D 34.8 1752 0.43 0.190 36.6 D 3505 0.70 0.190 41.0 D 26.5 1568 0.20 1.000 0.1 A 3469 0.11 0.190 33.6 C 25.3 1553 0.26 0.380 21.6 C C C C 3433 0.78 0.200 43.6 D 1863 0.40 0.200 35.5 D 33.6 C 2787 0.36 0.420 20.0- B ection Delay = 32.8 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = C IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:FWWBOEACC Page 1 HCS: Signals Release 3.1b "Inter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW City/St: TUKWILA, LA, WA. Analyst: GR Proj #: ate: 05/15/01 Period: FUTURE WEEKDAY WINTER PEAK /W St: BOEING ACCESS /PAC. HWY. N/S St: E. MARGINAL WAY IIHCS- Signals 3.1b File:FWSBOEACC HCS: Signals Release 3.1b 'Inter: BOEING ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR HCS- Signals 3.lb File:FSWNEWEMW Inter: NEW ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR 5 6 7 8 NB Left Thru Right Peds SB Left A Thru A Right Peds EB Right WB Right 6.0 4.0 0.0 A A 81.0 5.0 0.0 v/c g/C Delay LOS Delay LOS 1703 1524 2225 3297 uthbound 570 3676 4848 0.11 0.167 0.15 0.167 0.26 0.675 42.6 D 43.0 D 7.8 A 7.8 A 42.8 D 0.05/ 0.758 3.9 0.29 0.758 4.5 4.5 A ' Intersection Delay = 7.1 (sec /veh) Intersection LOS = A HCS- Signals 3.1b File:FSSNEWEMW 'Inter: NEW ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR ,Date: 05/15/01 E /W St: NORTH ACCESS HCS- Signals 3.1b File:FWWNEWEMW 'Inter: NEW ACCESS /EMW Analyst: GR ' Date: 05/15/01 E/W St: NEW ACCESS Date: 05/15/01 E /W St: NORTH ACCESS Intersection Orientation: North -South Major St. Vehicle Volume Data: Movements: 2 m(vph) /c 95% queue length 28 31 38 954 451 702 0.03 0.07 0.05 IControl Delay 8.9 13.6 10.4 LOS A B B Approach Delay 11.8 t f,base t f,HV P by Itf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 IIWorksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 814 829 314 308 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 304 298 Result for 2 stage process: Control Delay 8.2 10.9 9.7 LOS A B A IApproach Delay 10.1 Approach LOS B Result for 2 stage process: IControl Delay 8.8 13.3 10.3 LOS A B B Approach Delay 11.9 N N N Y N N Y N IGrade: 0.00 IILane usage for movements 7,8 &9 approach: Lane l Lane 2 Lane 3 . L T R L T R L T R t f,base t f,HV P by Itf 2.2 3.5 3.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.03 0.01 0.01 2.2 3.5 3.3 IIWorksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 'Conflicting Flows 180 Potential Capacity 835 IIPedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity 835 Probability of Queue free St. 0.96 'Step 2: LT from Major St. Conflicting Flows 360 Potential Capacity 1188 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 Movement Capacity otential Capacity 340 334 edestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.98 0.98 ovement Capacity 333 328 ,Result for 2 stage process: 0.98 0.98 IY 1.19 0.93 C t 553 543 Probability of Queue free St. 1.00 1.00 Control Delay 8.1 10.6 9.5 LOS A B A IApproach Delay 9.9 Approach LOS A D r a orr 1 A t4 E. MARGINAL •\— — • • !. • � :L • q• • t:: 100a 0 1 0 THE MEADOWS SRNRTORI UM INC. .ocw► tvAICMN•M, RPP I' O ctncN 7. J ►A /TOMS, MO4At• +O4'.O7 2355 DUL /EN STEEL PR 'UCTS INC. • THE. MEADOWS SfNATORlUMn. INC , N,DNI ,MIII'NMIN MIPaovID 'C�OCIi?t ! 1 ' 7•NIT/OMI• MDUALV ADUMDS rr ?�.,.� Ui '23 • 1 100 O g41 fY Pin �• 1t.•SS\L LiSSCai• CG ra •1217.111••• t �11• r ;;Library, LLC :t.. ■ copy produced by .. •�+.. 'Inc.. under arrangement with ' os,A.0"1 This file was checked out from the City's Records Center on: When you have completed your need for this information, please return it to the City Clerk's Office for check-in. Thank you! B1 B2 LEGEND Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location B3 B4 B5 B6 ACM (Asbestos-Containing Material) 17 • Sample Designation and Approximate Location B-LBP,1 • LBP (Lead-Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 17 20 40 Scale in Feet B-LBP-7 B7 B8 • B-LBP-6 Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington HANGAR B SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21-1-09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 6 GeotachnIcal and Environmental Consultants SHANNON iWILSON, INC. APPENDIX A ASBESTOS HAZARD EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACT (AHERA) CERTIFICATES 21 -1- 09383 -009 • A-LBP-1 A-LBP-2 Al A2 A-LBP-3 9 A3 A4 210 A-LBP-4 LEGEND Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential 1 c Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos-Containing Material) 17 • Sample Designation and Approximate Location A-LBP-1 • LBP (Lead-Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 40 Scale in Feet 12eA- 014 1 13 ' 15 A5 A-LBP-5 • Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington HANGAR A SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21-1-09383-009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. GeotschnIcal and Envtronmental Consultants FIG. 5 Date: 11 -16 -2001 I: \Draftiny\211 \09383 - 009\21 -1- 09383 -009 Asbestos Sample Locs.dwy 1© 17• LBP -1 • „mmaims■-- z Vent 00 4 • LBP -01 • 5 • LBP -02 LBP -04 LBP -03 Vents 0 O LEGEND Lead Vent Caps Fire Door ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos - Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead -Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 40 Scale in Feet Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14-06 ROOF SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21 -1- 09383 -009 SHANNON & WILSON, INC. FIG. 4 Geotechnlcal and Environmental Consultants CD 0 0) 21 10 LBP-12 LBP-11 17 20 15 13 • 4 LBP-13 LBP-10 16 01.8 • --y1D17 LEGEND k,) Fire Door i • 17. LBP-1 • ND (Not Detectable) PACM (Potential Asbestos Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location ACM (Asbestos-Containing Material) Sample Designation and Approximate Location LBP (Lead-Based Paint) Chip Sample Designation and Approximate Location 0 20 - 40 Scale in Feet Museum of Flight Expansion Hazardous Building Materials Survey Seattle, Washington BOEING BUILDING 14-06 GROUND LEVEL SAMPLING LOCATIONS November 2001 21-1-09383-009 • SHANNON & WILSON, INC. Geotechnical and Environmental Consultants FIG. 2 %Yunc.s A7vre DOM an ,co 1/rSino bra D. E I'an DyIre —Soren." L. Afar-sic/2 1.. Na,rief T l;rn Asset/ Benet dor) 1L(op t -1-r� Ilt_�_llL 11.13- fcr.S.n1,K [t0 •a1N C /a.a Rivers Netherland I'merican Morryo9e Bonk /orr•ne L. A /✓,s7'e,, / /arrie/ Jane ran /7.5.1 ell Denaa'on 0 O nie/ .5hea Th,rlc/ T ran 4.0c-// finadon John C. MCFe•e omas Bt/rns r �.. .O L 1 M 1 TJ 777.lc/ 2 1t1 11rn.y 0... Assr/1 • I.•n... M• N.11 P.n Cl,.,. w r,. - cat�az3i:1 ,l&_. // &ur L un,dl, Co nicfrenser) Ea /a/c eye/ Psra //,Arlie .. 9 Caine Aen Minnie fl Caine en :, ✓. F. /J /C E/r y ail • 4lo, ly,s2e flrnX, e• C a C s /-r) o g e St. «'0 17 .••1 rl O.;•.fii/son !0 %,-47,,sor/ fs %9rc A7.8 N L1. n'l r• 1 tote 1.LC(u_i.If itt! • r.l.crr •c ■e, jet E -Y G,,.+ ll/ $00 Al. J. C.srlreelr tol 912 -N10 ScNe: 2no'. I inch ♦ 7♦ / /1 KROU. MAP Co, 5CATrLL w^ iJ -IJL � .1, .1. I.2 .I I -n-. ..._.. . .s•t 1E1 z 3 - c L 1.4V 010 t1 000 30 41 14 60 T1) '0 414 • \ \ \♦ • \ • \ B\OI \EIN(3 F IELD I SEA TTLE A /RPORT ,1 \ \Q \%%1.:1 • i \� T1 21 \� � '0 r n la rrrn TR CT • 7 70 41 t7 4 ft n .0 TL 6 11741 S_FATTLE' C /TY L /M /TS • SOUTH LINE OF HENRY VANASSELT DONA ;ION _CLAW N! 50 LINE OF FRANCIS ',PRATT DONATION CLAIM N! 33 92 71110° N 400 mot- cam' T ACT 3 TRACT 6 /S./j ^' TRACT 2 V• Poet P. G.ce• et,/ HR AIONJANT0 C4FM/ 4 CO. TRACT" I 4. TRACT 5 PRE f/CE NURSERY d 7 r� LECORATIN6 CO. A. MEADO F /rir . \\-' SAN /JA.P WS /U,1/ Jl GIL r OIL AUTO CAMPS tr I' ,L, M 11 1 k 4 I1r \ \< 174 7 \i \4 111 r) _r ♦• 700TH L IRE Of FRANCIS M•NA/T xi! NORTH LINE OF 11 OTHY GROW DONATION CLAIM N! 44 4 10 1 14 I' I�pwglu 1 SL CIS 94o-f96o ICrol.l.'s .Alas of S.cri, / 3c•1 e: 200' 1 inch SEATTLE, / fcROLL MAP GO, SeArnI WO SLAT T.L .IJ © RROLL IAAP Co. F E. �ARGA11 WAY S. $- to -o l' T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIPTION TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING N28'43'34`W 658.80' N28'43'34'W 213249. BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST, SEATTLE, WA 98102 (206) 323 -4144 FAX (206) 323 -7135 1- 800 - 935 -0508 E -MAIL: INFO®BRHINC.COM JOB NO 2001047.01 SCALE 1■200' DRAWN PJL CHECKED OCN DATE 8/10/01 T- HANGAR A & B PARCEL DESCRIP110N WASHINGTON TUKWILA Iti ..... 00109111111111111 1110001111 •111111 o••• } :i ••• • ••• ®•• •• •11 1111 � N if �. W o• cip OPOO 9.0.11 N OMNI ts.1..•• 411111110 1111• • e■ ••11 • W •b 1111•• 'S -r� �'' - :fit <4�5- .u����j't`` 11111 ' :••• - 1411111k,all 11111111111111101 ijiiijijE • o •••••o••o•o �u z ••o o• GO Q W r ...� , t; 'il'fY �''�lr��,"1111111111 `Z ••• 1j� i 1 3tt4t c. AI 1 r t t ' F tl . � � , �1.9L- 4 �' 11 �••••••• •••• Z A•I••••• •••M. a N ,•11•• ®•1111 s•oo W o g O _ > CV O LLJ 20 1 . ` CC O ,QC �rr�li;j4irl; IIIIIIILIIIII IIII11IllllllliIIlll liiullliullIiIIIIIIlililirlilliIJIIII 'I_ii/� gillllirl`IIIIIIIIUIi/� ' jiiiiIIIllllllllllllflllllll11I1IIILI I - </IIIIIIIIII111111IIIIU • - . oos�.ovewoos f-1F tEV+rwtamlc L L_ I L L L_ll U 1111 LI II I f l I I Iat' 111 Sou) Axiom Street .. Seas, Masliyton 03104 Fos (2013 8303n0 Wet repot Barkstdo . .. AR99 • Engineers • • . Settle. WA98101• . • Sm Faasm, CA 94103 • • MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle,. Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN January 31, 2002 Site Plan Scale: 1/64' =1' -0' •.FL111J J_LL111JJ , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 I.1 I11.1.IIII1111I.1t1 L -y -,1111 /111111 1 • 11 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/ "1 1 1 1 -/ 1.1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1;1 '1 ,. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I'1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 ■ , 1 Lc 11 "' 1 1 1 - -1 ' r r 1 1 1 I 1' , I 1 1 -I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I'1 -- � ' 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 • L11J . LLLLIIJ..1_LLI I I 1 - -y jl 11+t I Tl.l 11 i 1 1 1 / 1.111'. 1'11111..1,,,li1 __j 111111111.1.1111 1111 1.11.1111.:.1111 -- ''.- III'111111111 / .1 1 1 1 - ___ / 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r_7 / / 1 1.1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1, 1- +4 - 4- +i +1- +�" / 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1.1, 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 /. 11 rl 1 1 1 11 l 1 u 1 11i l 1 1 - - __--__ 11111 11- • 'fTl i ', FI L1 -i -; - 1 +-1 - f H . 111,,• .11 J J � m oeo.c - SSA :71 11111111'1 '111.111.11111 I"I" - H-1-14+++1 1'Lf 111_1 1 1' 1 1 __4 111111 ..111 it11111'1111 • . I'1 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1I I I II111111-1 11 1/11 1 1 1.1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111i 1 Fl;ff1J 1 1 1 1 1 1; 11 I/ / /I 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1. 1 1 1 -'-7 / • y ' 1 1 1 1.1 1 11' l/.#// { 1 1 1 1 1 111 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U, 111111 111111:1 111'1 l l l ll'I 111 I p-r�r1T'1'rl4 .1- _1- LLLIJJI_L1.L+4 I..1 1 1 1 11 I I 111II I I 1 _ TITrT 1•l 11.11 1 1 I 1 1.11 1111111 1 1.1 t 1 I 1 +/ / - l / '1'1 I I 11.1 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 -- 1 1 / .11. 111111 '111111 -- 11111 / LL111JJ_LLI /. `J 1'1 1 111 ITI 1 11.1 1.1 I ! "I I [Trf1 i 1111 U�I�LI�!•�•n'� �� "„J� - -'- `� Gl11111111 III11111IJi _W111111111I1II1IILC�\ �II lid 111111.1111i!f IIIIII{Ii!IIIIH! it ((1 I :I -I C11. 1111(- 11 -11 :1 i f /1111111111111 .1111.111 -1111 /TM-1 l I 1 1111 111 ) 1J.11111.1.1.1111111.1IH 1.1111.1! 111111.1.111!!H 1.L1, J.I1.1111111111111!111L/ / 7 �l I I • , I I /may • r} r NOTE THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR ORIENTATION ONLY - SEE ENLARGED SITE PLAN, CIVIL, AND • LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL 811�Ip Wed Yglpamn Baste*. The Onrdlsm Group . nbb1 : ., �A Stoat S1Ym291 111 Soefi Jedeen Siest - -' Wehmen Dots Group Sas*. WmMglon 9810 1a16svap*AldieeWse pas) z24fi555 ..:2329 Fast Maria// St Fax MS) 621.2900 Seethe, WA 98112 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington - PHASE Al CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS OWL MAID ___ _ -1 NL micema eee ®41 1 I I B G spa1V 11110k —_��1 a.eamnt • sus OT - -- SITE • PLAN PHASE Al 0 2D eD • Ld'S�Ir 11 „ 11.1 ' J 1 11111 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1, -11 -_ 1- J_LL L111 i ! • I III 1111 111111111111 II1111111 I , • 1 1 ly ,, i - i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 . -I 111.111.111.1111I-I1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1.1 1 1 i- 1- H4t1- + -1- F- 1-1- +i -I-1"�' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 11'i 11111 !1'1111 111'11' T4 -i. i - li Fi-1 +4-H -i i.PH.H • 11.11; 11 .A,,,,,.1111111 - -J NO WPM meet sous I I 1 1 11.1.1 1'1 1 1 1 1 1'I 1 1 I I 11 11 11 11 11 It 111111 11 __J 1111111.11 ' - I1.11111I�I -I 11111 - -1 LLL111JJ_LLT'T4 --- -__y 1! I I 1 1 1 1 1 1! 1! 1 1 1 11 ;111 i 1, i1 .I 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 V I I I I,1 1.1 1 1I I I H-1,--14-1-1+1-1-f4-1-1 _y x11111111 1 111. '111111111 11111111111111 -J 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 , . . , , , , . 1.1 1 1'1 1 1 I 1 1 1' 1'1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1•I 1 I'I1 1_L LIIJJJ_I_L11 J --'4 x111111111.1111 - -J 1 .11A :I ! 1 1•1 1 1 1 I'I '1 I I I I I 1 -_J 1111.11i•i11i1 11.1111111111 111/11111•r, I.1 I I I I I I I 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I/ / 1 1 1! J 11 Fiii t /- 1 1 1 I l l -1 - l l-t '/ 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 V / I I I,I 1 1 1 I -llli Ji fi+ T-1 1111111 •/ 1!.111 I I' 11.1111111 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :1 11 1 1 1.' .' 1 . 1 IA 1 t i l l , 1 1 1 I"I 1 1 -1.1 1 1 I I 1; 1 1'I 1 1 1 1 1 1 !, 1! !/ 11111)11.1 I . 1•1111111111111 / • . 1 1 1 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'I :, -_y 1 1' 1.1 1 1' 'LL111JJ_LLLliJJ _LL1,(JJ • TI7T �1 j- .� _J _ ../ • 'EXISTING BUILDING I(.Tj.i7Tf71'i;f Tii: i1 j1;;I;i1 J!'!�.!l.' I :.! i.l ! i i _. ('I•1fT7T1:i !TI �. .I i l.i - 1.11 1 : �-r-; '.�. i I I � ..I i I i � I.i � 1 I I'. .i I 1., i I''_ 1 . .. 1 . ;1-77;1 , ,// NOTE THIS SITE PLAN IS FOR ORIENTATION ONLY - SEE ENLARGED SITE PLAN, CIVIL, AND LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL nbbj SUMO Weld Ma sn n Webb The Gnendndl Cheep ancient end CM Weems Amebae Cambia 179t 591 Avenue, Side 3290 190D West *berm Sheet Sub 201 Seelb WA 89101 !ebb WA S3119 111 Sash leitson Sheen- MU= Culp beep • • batik, Wa * 90104 lantucepe Arc:Mabee 2329 East en %It2 SL . 6214300 Setae. WA 90112 . • MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington PHASE A2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ■ -- cobs G FIte9TiX . Fnn OF Wiiii oEM Ye: - �AVJ� iI®If1941 • • CHO . 9n<14 111e .� ma e ! met tr earn I 2t13 '1',1 . .1+ / Y . . -. _ ■ r - - _____ .. 1 IOR 119 -rt19- 3'119- rI19 -r l9- r- 17- 3119- 3ri9- Y�19- r, -r' .-- 2 2 ■ 0000 8 00000 nbb Strlrasetetd CPA ErraYren Ammrnl0a 9 13015th Awo94Sub 32:0 1900 West Stne1. Sub J, See19A WA 08101 SootPu WA 98119 111Salh Jackson Street . *ohm Deep Group See* Wasttriton9B104 . LaIdatave Anide1 & �a?35555 2329 East Malian SL .. F xR06j821- 00.. .SamOe,WA%112 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington . DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 A11( • r I11 11 11 111 . Iur • • ;cam ; • ii9'- Yf 19'- Yf19'- Y( 19'- YIt9•- Yi19 •- YI79'- 7'i19'- Y�19'- Y�19' -Y�. O 8.0 . O O O O O.8 9 IGR • .7 IOR nba�`.' Skim Ward l4ipmsR BeIW91e. ib Bnenbuseb Giro up , 3 :: 9a9 °eluAmso-mtSwam ' 111 Smith brYvl Sleet Thiseso Dodge Groep salte,wal9pon9Bta Lerehee eWhetee • Rlel Sore. East WYldl I2 Et • Fax MB) sm®e. wAmlu MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 FIRST FLOOR LIFE SAFETY & KEY PLAN ALL SECTORS o az er A120 bbj . Mani VW Wim BadWie The Poeaiaeeh Gimp • . and CM . �, 13019h Alen* Sera 3719 1999 Weil Ntlraem Street 201. • Swale, WA 99101 .See®e, WA98119 1119aabrlem Semi . WeWn=Data Gump Same, Westerc e98104 .laWtsQe Mdieetn .2329 Eat WS= Si Seeds, WA 53112 • MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001,. MEZZANINE LIFE SAFETY & KEY PIAN ALL SECTORS G 18. 7z er ®� A130. NA T LLflM6 I xda j19' -S I19'- Sii9'- Y119'- Y;19'- Y(19'- S {f9'-Si19' -S 19' -5 19' -S: = - 2 MLR i t j f T j T 1 (�) J ION 88880888 OO 131:151NOt1d Mammon BMdire The Onombmfd Shaw/ and CM Erginears , Accused Camp 1301 Rh berm&Me 3200' - 1910 Ned Palo= Slut sae 2111 SeeID4 WA 61101 Seale, WA 98119 Weisman Design Group Landscape &A IM= SI. AmBeSL . 2329 . . &We, WA 913112 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 1213271elBBl .. 41' -r . ! .41' -r •i {1'-t . i • 41.-E . 41' -r • • • SDting and rdCM LIul tB , The Gleentand Cumelpp�' '�nb� 1301 SAMsne, Sum 370D 1300Wetl Name Sesel9Yb 701 J -Seeds, WA 98101 Seems, WA1311Y • 111 S,Wmen Said • Weblm Design Ses� . Seem% WraHn�n113101 IsmtapeAtdibrdn 7z+ . .. ': 41'-e• • 41'-r 11' -8- 41'4' 41. -8• 41 -r .1' -e• 41' -e• 41' -d' .: .l -e• 41•-0• 1 figroriffirgi O O O '. O O O O.. - O OO59' -1%' � .te " -Of' 1 !6' -Uf' RDX.1A701 • SN4E PLY m BtraE.9d9TR''TN. '1r 0001Spaa \d 001116'0151 : 19'- T'19' -T 19•- S,19• -r 19' -r 19'- 9' -Si rOONl4lR ' 17 It 73• e1BMn1 CUTTER O O OO O O O O O O O Magni Wed Wpn s= BeWie SWmeel ed OA Enp6nae 1201601 Mew, Suls 510 Suds, WA 98101 • Wdwee Da* 0,010 lalmaepeNdimOn 2829 East Malice SL 'Seel9e. WA9e112 GreedRnels 6nup Aon6Rml 1800 WW11Bdcaem Street Sub 201 M O"WA 98119 MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT- SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 ROOF .. LIFE SAFETY & KEY PLAN ALL SECTORS 1x.52' 'er !!!!19ln.19!!I!_ ! ! !! ..n uuq.L••Pu Tip 11111111111111111 MMMMM 1 u•nnunuuuulln HMI ill 'I" 11414411114 • FI 1494' 11111111 1 Ilii1111111111111111 ■11111i ±111111111!gi11119i1 =, 0 EAST aEVATION AT MAIN ENTRY ------GLASS S TIORI TTSI*IC. . a -I Mil CLAM. CEAIAI.2.I. •0T. -1 1SMEE [CAPER 18411 • • OPERATE/AL WNW (9110■) A. 1ECH ROOM 2415.3 (ARV) AE 3/230! FOR F1EVA10N Or M6- • IosammicliiasiasEseMIIESIM► W & — ;. ' _ -- - _ ---_= -_ =I 1: Mill ∎MM •• 0 - -.. ` ■1 :..LISA(;.►= =�=�== + 03 06 m 8 >(nrnIienunJ(I!II a [qunuine`(►�nimm�m LOG1I TOMS Al Yll -7 YR -1 wow. MNW`. C4-1 TOP. AL DOORS THIS EIIVAIAW . EAST ELEVATION WAIT 411 CV I /WI un30211 Inn _fL 37R.5'� SEE. 5/A301 rtl rLEVA104 DNS. Oa 8 -'83 8 bl NORTH ELEVATION AT COMMERCIAL GALLERY szkv vu• - • BD ❑ 4,4175'.* fl 47156 - n *la5' * Br BG O • (B2 f1 TT 'S' F f155' * B3 BA 8 8 8 SOUTH ELEVATION AT COMMERCIAL GALLERY EA1) BK BL By 0w�I111IIiUI111RI111g11 =MOWN. ■ IMi =MIWW= • 11112M i —rr• r1 =MEM= MIMI__ alIMM= ____ _rlel_ 11 ���A r1 =MIMI= 111•=IL1= II WII=I=1•• MI WMt••rMt SIT II MI= OMNI MI NI 1r IMINErrt1 111•L1 11 •1111•lW♦Wr r1 IN IL •••MOI erIMI11111•11 CUtTANWNI EAST ELEVATION AT COMMERCIAL GALLERY • ®1 SlaLIERANZALASS : WNW popes 11P Al MAINAR DOORS 111E7A a a-A. 11P AT MANGARp0U6 n , 111015 a a -2 - :1P Al UPPER CURT/MALL. 116 ELEVATION • (11401' U a -1. .ISP AT LOITER CUREMIWAU HIS E1EV411)1 n -975 VOW. • fl 477'5'* ' BL , BK e 1 BN) O. O '1 BE' O O' . O O ■ ELI . 61L -3 NIL 4 WEST ELEVATION AT COMMERCIAL GALLERY El '.075' * • TL 177'5' Cl *195' 'BkWbp Ward YpegaaR BaMIhI The BnL�e6 Grob nbb B N SDeb, Sub 20l Jackbo _ _ - bulb, WA 011101 • Seam*, WA MID • Seems Wadiplm BSI% • lrlmugaPedlled= 233 Saul When 3. Setae. WA B8112 B112 ' MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 fECf1RI0:Y1Li BUILDING ELEVATIONS Ir 13 32 A301 MET NUMBER ............ NSA MEL a tar aoCC 918 PER 9MICI1Ba • •a WISITIRE BeRRER ON CURL 17440010 ME01L -014 Wf0CIED 0BfF4EE MEN REIMER ON MEET 91.5 W/- R -21 BUT I MT O OM • r u0 AT RaERBR �I�1. 1 @0 a IR I e wP I II ll�R� -IIypleffin oo od000 �E� O - B1RUDe / s9a 'lIE'�1=1.is1 7o�ilw � nm s.rv: -- ,.o o — —TIP YFT/L 2 J. PM1Pl . RETU 2 ew1 MET a • STEEL 571.5 PER SRNCIIWL 10 e•-0' AFT OSECTION AT COMMERCIAL GALLERY -SCr1: 1/14 1.0 nbb1 BMW Wad YRpmg$10 BedoRPn The GAsI dI10oop SaRmeelet CME AapsBVl Cmetdr0 1 WA 98101 , Memo. Sub 3220 1 Bean Sim( Sub 201 Seale, WA 9011 111 Sac" Jack= S8ee1 Welmen Group Beetle, Was igEn 9810 Lal0eeepsAl0OelAee . 2:115 �2738655 2870Em1Ydmaa .. .. 8081821 -278D • ' Seek; WA 98112 • MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington " ... DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 BUILDING SECTIONS A310 MEET NUMBER 6kWmp Were Yapeman BW Wdse . 7e. enaaeerL � naay • 111 South Adam Stied . . Ws= Gaup. • (Sates,West* 98104 .. ' latlteape Arddad,n 2329 East Fax Roe) a21-230). SI WA 98112 g MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington DESIGN DEVELOPMENT - SEPTEMBER 14, 2001 BUILDING SECTION SECTOR KEY PUJI v 1 1 11 II 11.1 f i 1 i 1 7 I I I IL11 —L I I I I I .A 1 1 1 1 I I 1' .1--r7 I _ - fft7 4_I 1 I I I 1 1 I I .I I I 1 I 1 6 1 1 71101 I I1./ I •1 I- II I I I I I I I 0 0 . 1/ . •1 I , / a• cRCL • - ♦ '� 61c.- + -+-• -• - >•a / /M ON...! i acata(NIm a� ••%ia ���u.,I,lr .v x7r�>+�?, '•.,�-= :!`°'• .- a3..��i' cr !T.n �� Ii it�i:� d_ ���� rrri► 1421111111111B6NEM: a /Il!11� /%� Inbbj MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN. SEPT.14, 20C 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 I • I I- 11 R,�` I. 1 1 1j� 1 � 1 � 1 1 1 1 4 1 I 1.1 1 0' • ; .1 o _ 1. 1 1 -.- / • -r f 7 1 1 1 1'.I•1.1 L L'11 J J_1_L MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN . SEPT.14, 200 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE 83•001 Bel.b.lfil Nam . CAO 0 0 — d Omallon LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE CONT. sped 0o1 dtaldEOmon I<tma - Mt Peo oemat re RmMe DeclCuw. Street /Shade Trees Raft, RocY ASP . ' Rem Mimeo Varleme/ Dmed•r Roma* Vac Apr Mans Rad BIM( Bad Nadi Earpear Caiems Trees Oms.es Moon. ' Rome fads EXISTING Appo:Mte 4• -6' evrgeen magnlla, to be rerouted •panne as shoo on plan 7' uL 1042' e. s II- bronzed, DOB, spawns as dean on plan • 7• uL 40'-17' e. oohed •pecmom, 011. M11-brarcrod ado. S' R. DNB. •pecan as mom on plan efalb• Boar • NAM 8en0 . O ' Stew Istom Oe EOM Lao'... CIO Lgl.ds Iona 0 0 Otexida Modem Warner Meow Wear War Woman see! Dodd vanes Boa *arm WYO. arse. . ITHEV/it/spoad. NII and bide; DID .• cant. ' *padre a anon an plan , . 71.741 h0pread, Ml and busty I013 or cam. epacae as even on plan D. waved, 111 bo and de. DID or cant. •pacts 0 P - Eva' Npead, full and btmhy ere or con. ^wens a anon en plan 1 gal coy nal and btnae •peas a• omen on plan tl•-D' ht. full and dare ere or col. •paces as LANDSCAPE NOTES • U ALL NEW LAIDSCAPE'AFEAD WILL BE WATERED WINO WATER- CCNSERVNG, AUTOMATIC - IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2) INSTALL 7• DEP1N SPECFIEDeuRK P14CN N ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS. 3) PROvEDE A 7' ?ALCM CeeCLE AR0/D ALL TREEB PLANTED 14 L4UN AREAS. 4) MERE GRCMCCOnER 15 TO DE PROVIDED. METALL AT 8PEC01ED DRAPING. NCLUDNG UNDERNEATH TREES MD) LARGE S1•em8. 5) ALL STREET TIL/E8 4LCTY MARGINAL 1111 RCM ARE TO DE APPRO.ED STREET TREES PEF KING COMT. SURFACE MAIER DIV REQUIREMENTS, 6J. REFER TO BPECFICATIME POR 400111 NAL REOINEt' - - • CnrnrnW Plasma 7a -30• e, full and body, HID of rant. •patbg as Root on plan • 74.30• e. 011 and buds. DID or corn.. spo e 0 5' -6' ht. NII and 0.611, 10 !saw. D15 or cont. . spacing a. don on plot Shear too at deeded Our a.taliatnn. I . 30.36• spoddt. hill are bshy DID o rat. 'epodes 0 don on plan . . • Rows Irmo' • Nee brand Ras NalbNdan me-Mare Moe Dar tram S gaL can4 11.111 and bode spaces a anon an plan • Me4. •neq bronze or bloat' voltage •pec0are. 2 g4L eon. 011 and bide •pecan as mom on plan • OWlarrpm1. made 0110 7.3 gaL con. full and burly spacing as amen on F. Reed Err or 9e Ord Grampian - - - VennOmes aopemOMm Emomaf :7 gat cot. NII and Way, •pawing as don on plan . Rama Frieda Wee. • • OrouldCCYMe COmoaealr dancer! 1 gaL con at 74• oz. V4rgular spaces; hill and • Wary, /pacing at w OZ. WNW DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING MdataR,0. 10.04 gaa0eadt s.M 1011 Owe Parleada Lime a TrrIWaO' Tam ••■ • Pans YwerYe rabies' Labe Irma Br0rb t tams (root ' Ram tape imam B4Orry COO becalm 24• -30• e, full and buds BIB or rant. spacng 0 d on en plan ' 71 -74• K. NII and bode BID o rat, spacag 0 e ven an plan 18.71' It, rWl and trey DID or coy .pecan as Mean on plan • . 18 -7. apeaddt. NII end buds OM or ram. . awcag as even en plan - lb-70 rt. full and Wee BID or cot. spaces as Moo an plan b-2l' spread all and btely BIB o cent_ spaces as Ono on plan 71 -74• speedat. NII and bushy DID or cot. spacing 0 dram en plan • Peranid Ascots Er3YSm Haler l0.0 fEB) Rola Edema, Etas •IO* d • (trio MOM Rom Gam 1 gaL try triangular spaces, NU and bushy, quantnlo as netad en plan. 1 gal. cent. trio 9011 . pacing. MI and bMe ' quanta.* as dated en plat , Pamela a: hem •sae . gat 1 g4L cont. trlargu11 spacing Ml and bushy R MA Som quantities as noted on plat Bear Matra soy (34 , 1 gal cot. Visaged .padag. Ml and Lacey gmtNa a• noted en plan. • - A1r.0O tsbmr041 Mow' .(AU 1 gr a rat, triangular •peel g. ruu and body, Osman Wam ed . quatnN• as roved on plan.. • i 001 cot, tr1n9411 padre, 'AI and Wee L.o*0 .•ado 03). BOMM Loom. . ' quantal. as noted on plan Neeorooe. Na. 00 1 gal. cot, via gular spaces NO and tree galntl111sm a• noted en plan. ANN t' l< Vii. /.�3-7-, ' Tremlg piers• Mammon CantOMI • Liven. el Tres • W. LOOM • Crmm tommi .o0 Bs Room Plat 01 *Ingle no ad/0ot to mu Inc plants pr eyaeol 1 961.-cent., vlarnular •paten, rultand - guaranies as noted On plan • I gat cot. tilangula •peeing. run and tames . quantities a. dated on plan I gal rant. triangular spackn, full and buatJ. • . • manta.s as noted 01 plan • • • ca P.' '7.`01:.: ,,'A., , A _. rIY�t7 \r \� t C. �� - am 10 Nom. Irma .]s1 a amAr��rl�_rl•���Zm.ar. .�a�a� l ► 1 ► . 0 . E o ■ ...!. ; . , , ! Ai tim v ___ . M„. ...--. _,-.„ .. 60104• poi. 6' 00. va�W lac 40101 ed. , 000940 * • Lr 00 014nngu' O1 spa I09. varied. le be detasred by dor. . • 3se .p.wlrlulwr f >. Moto. ragm.nrt.. Seeded a Budded Lama 'ne nto wed Gres. Paving • E0.bg Trees to Reared C 0..pave 7. Ga••oele o w. ew .. ' 0911S010041. Mu voids wart top00I ado weed. see .pecelutl00 fo 1000 requnemots. • Repair are 01•ten is= damaged by 00.1 0110, activity. • • Save and protct • LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT -WEST EDUCATION ENTRY mom LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT -EAST ENTRY MIT MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION Seattle, Washington PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SEPT.14, 2001 p. koPosEW ROOF 'Laws ow= BUWC Rg7E➢E D BETWEEN FAR MG 77 ORDERN ND PROPOSED ROOF PUNE • DASHED lilt %MS 77R PORT 77 OP1TERN EF/Dwc RODE EDGE EL 569 . ROOK E4 734' 'ARSE Sklang want Magnusson Elarlintre Its Croat:ea Group MUSEUM OF FLIGHT EXPANSION. BUILDING SECTION NI w