The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSEPA EPIC-295-85 - TSD BUILDING ASSOCIATES - SOUTH 151ST STREET VACATIONT.S.D. BUILDING ASSOCIATES STREET VACATION PORTION OF S. 151ST STREET S. 151STST. RIGHT -OF -WAY BETWEEN 52ND AVE. S. & I -5 RIGHT -OF -WAY EPIC - 295 -85 WAC 197 -11 -970 1 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal Street Vacation portion ofS151st Street Proponent T.S.D. Building Associates Location of Proposal, including street address, if any S. 151st St. right -of -way located between 52nd Avenue S. and I -5 right -of -way. Lead Agency: City of Tukwila File No. EPIC- - 295 -85 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. �( There is no comment period for this DNS This DNS is issued under 197 -11- 340(2). Comments must be submitted by Wednesday, October 23, 1985 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. This determination is subject to the following condition: Utility easements and access shall be allowed for adjacent users including access for t-'SDOT. Roadway maintenance. shall be made. by TSD proper, ty owners. Responsible Official Brad Collins Position /Title Planning Director Phone 433 -1845 Address 6200 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Date October 8, 1985 Signature - • ;0, You ma y appeal eal this determination to the City Clerk at C Ha 1, 6200 Southcenter Y Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 no later than 10 days from the above date by written appeal stating the basis of the appeal for specific factual objections. You may be required to bear some of the expenses for an appeal. Copies of the procedures for SEPA appeals are available with the City Clerk and Planning Department. FM.DNS CC: woo KC 1-50 E.I1 i bi-t- 8" u.,urafce t.ompany q "Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said preml,,s. It does not purport to show all roads or easements. The Com• pony assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. N b /04 S. /.514:1" 69.117 CNh, 30 Ise 1 IZMIR k71' (Moos) 8 i. 1'31.62.5 /0 /06 (Men-) t � .7 • I 3e 130 -X '. i 6 /5 a► x oeM;.; ,. dl!~L' LOT DIMENSIONS AR$ WCCORDINO TO PLAT; EXCEPT WHERE OTHERWISE INDICATED. /20 9* tn N 3 14 ,zo ST . ;. 0'985 cf',I4-4,14601- c ECKLIST ContrlNo. Epic File No.G-��I'8' Fee $100.00 Receipt No. 09-11 A. BACKGROUND rr 1. Name of proposed project, •if applicable: T•5 •b • &i 1div19; Mend �6i) t4 Sfree- 2. Name of applicant: -r_s. b• ,asocial-es 3. Address -and phone number of applicant and contact person: B (LUMP . 1107 NE 45* al-, #k 423 Sea-Ic1 C Z(32 -18 °O . l)UO.SU t `1R16.5 4. Date c ecklist prepared: fi ., Iq$5 5. Agency requesting Checklist: City of Tukwila 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): )1;60(51/1. QS pc) 651 . 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 00. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been pre ared, or will be .prepared, directly OJ tly related to this proposal. cleiVirolt(44eU (idi 4— li Ltil U Y►` r L gill el 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property . covered by your proposal? If 'yes, explain. Klo . • 10. List any government approvalk or permits that will be needed for your proposal. V& a 1c5H t C .fee +6r S . 151ST Sfreef, dos,+- Are 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not . need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternatives of your proposal and should not be summarized here.- Vike- LtS - S. j ST t,��as = arF SZ►'� ; " _ �� ,r Srsr ^ - L_ 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reason-Wry available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applica- tions related to this checklist. r, 5. l 6l'T 51-• , c� t a� s2 I��f. Cie -4A. i ti TU.ku�i la 1 U314 • ?least. Owtd PY . I . . 1 6 -- f 13, rv.4p .eLtiuelof 1 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAIP B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth • Evaluation for Agency Use Only a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Fla+- - b. What is the steepest. slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 'tS% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 5i I+ � Icd 1 not deuse �L l . d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immedi.atevicinity? If so, describe. /Jo- e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanti- ties of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. 14010_. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 95- 100'/0 • Evaluation for h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: L cQSCs� _ 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the • proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. vn V Ins 1 cs c rk u9eriL. Agency Use Only b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 1.10 • Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air; if any: pj_. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. jacnv,•e . Evaluation for Agency Use Only 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Isio . 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would' be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 14614.e 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. Igo. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Mo Evaluation for Agency Use Only b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quan- tities, if known. j(•o . 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sour- ces, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. . c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. 1-1414. Ac a.duv • • 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water ,irrypacts, if any: ground, 04— a.p� it_ 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetati n found on the site: a -- ail ja,cek deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount or altered? f v getation will be removed c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Licwi€_ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance ve!etation.on the s itt(e},. if any: (�� rtb 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Ibt&c4o1 rds, robiits mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: KIClN -e, b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. 'jaw._ c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, • explain. isjo . d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solor) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will � used for �h'eatC ink, manufacturing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. lJp. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Woe.. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. I(p 1) Describe special emergency services that might `i be required. ev►e, . 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environ- mental health hazards, if any: Now._ Evaluation for Agency Use Only • b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? OLIN 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short - term or a long -term basis (for example: traf- fic, construction, operation, other)? Indipate what hours noise would come from the site. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: time. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? r _PP 4-r.�- . Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 140 c. Describe any structures on the site. e_,. Evaluation for Agency Use Only • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Pu.b(ic rD0.dt;U(4�e f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? rt (t L. Ircdu9 g. If applicable, what is the current horeline master program designation of the site? Does IAD+ apply. h.. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Lib• i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project ?gyp, . Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Klktle„. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: kla, . 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is com- patible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: .1l. 1 _.J►: ■0�i'iilf�' Evaluation for Agency Use Only • 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? Wcoc . b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eli- minated?. Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. Wbw e c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Mew_ . 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? atiums- b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? go1e.. c. Proposed measures impacts, if any: to reduc or c ntr aesthetic -13- Evaluation for Agency Use Only 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or pro- posed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. N ewl.e,. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.jJ ati} . c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: “Ovit..• 14. Transportation, a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed accss to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. 5244° . 5 anal WA 6.. fur 52,4-0 S. t eess 40 I. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stoR? 3 '6 euf-- Evaluation for Agency Use Only c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? plat. ofpll C& Wok- • • Evaluation for d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (in icate whether public or priv te). S. IS1sr Sfr..e ) cast c 52- rf . e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes would occur. tit-+- g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: abni, 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. pap. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Agency Use Only III Evaluation for Agency Use Only 16. Utilities a. Circ1 uttilities currently ay.' able at-the site: tricit natu . •as, ,ice (refuse servic septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the NO�� immediate vicinity which might be needed. V)e • C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. adtkAtall Nioate Signature: Date Submitted: x • S /98'S TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLIC• III Evaluation for Agency Use Only D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not imple- mented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? t-i' uncut d.r -• Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life? Up gf -. • Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, ani- mals, fish, or marine life are: l■Itsme_. • • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? T,1- mdkA, Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resourses are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? S+ c nkiALm t Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Mome . 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inclduing whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline vses incompatible with existing plans? Z'4- (;oo4 • Evaluation for Agency Use Only Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts area: IJd1,0! . How does the proposal conform tp the Tukwila Shoreline • Master Plan? NOL apps CCQ.hlf 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? :r4-- uxrui (44 Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: . 7.. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requir ents for the protection of the environment. 04) e,mh(4 -, Evaluation for Agency Use Only . Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Usq Policy Plan? If so, what poli- cies of the Plan? Mi). Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: ki■ylf. • • TO'BE COMPLETED BY APPLICA• E. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The- objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the aforegoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a'general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental infor- mation provided and the submitted plans, documents, suppor- tive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objective(s) of the proposal? To inprbv� at;�-�t,�q road -r-`or access -Fo -� -tire_ bat ��CS . D . $i li td 'i ) 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? .ealc. 3. Please compare the alternativeireans and indicate the preferred course of action: 146/tie, Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Use Only 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila - Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? If so, what.poli- cies of the Plan? 00. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: [ OpIiCosole1 -23- EXHIBIT ";,q'" Tracts 3 and 4, Young's Half Acre Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 37, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT for that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 594284 for State Highway No. 1; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated South 152nd Street which attached to said premises by operation of law, under City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 502, passed December 4, 1967. NI 60A bif- "a" s �.. - u,aurance t.ompany of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show all roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. 40 Lo i /34.dZ5 /06 9 /S/41 . I 69.824'&61,0 3, 31). in 01' (Mats) T31. Gas /0 /06 S, x 7 (Mj L a Jo 13 _ /5 Z/ NP(114e4s1 Z 6 �9G'P►�)~ z o �l ST /zo 96 10 d EI LOT DIMENSIONS AR$ ACCORDING TO PLAT; EXCEpj 1ERA OTHERWISE INDICATED, 1 • 133 # ? -- - -• --� . w I 2 H► cI 133 .1 1 De P�� CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: I 'I BLDG PLNG PROJECT LOCATION POrtiO c&i5)5 DATE TRANSMITTED N -AQ -25 STAFF COORDINATOR "Yn(ni'a% •CN X5035 EPIC vq5-85° FILE POLICE n P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10- 115- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ' DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: n BLDG n PLNG PROJECT .T,j. a �,( VO Cast n LOCATION p(jrt 1Ofl 0&J5)6- DATE TRANSMITTED 0--‘,W -(35 STAFF COORDINATOR 17?n((2) FIRE CN Y5-6,35. EPIC 2q515S FILE POLICE (j P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10-'7-$5" RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT Ilk. ALL A J ;AC-0, %1 U? �`;.5 <�= i •1\ t'L�(rIN 1\C(L-`' •K • Wcp07 M\ )<\L t l s A 1 ( c.L-u DATE COMMENTS PREPARED BY_ C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: ( 1 BLDG L LNG ri P.W. 1 FIRE PROJECT T/ -. Q. fr Vo Csgiti LOCATION poy' on DATE TRANSMITTED C) -.w .85 STAFF COORDINATOR `1'f0)(2) CN 157-0,35 EPIC ;qj 15 FILE POLICE n P & R FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY II- 715- RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT DATE 771/9/ M17/ 1,1/174A. s X57 ex09Efuti'5- COMMENTS PREPARED BY i C.P.S. Form 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN 050,35 EPIC 261515 FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: BLDG PLNG (� P.W. `% FIRE 1 POLICE (� P & R PROJECT -15.C), VO �- W O 1 LOCATION pvriQn DATE TRANSMITTED , q- -05 STAFF COORDINATOR urnC fra) FILE NO. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY )0-'7-$5 RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT ;r 0. `;,'� 7c (/4 47L .► o `t` S'l�tr -c�� G1�4/( pie �PTII .vr � -Fib` �'. } C • r, , ii 4 Ct S Slyt2d GZ Gl Ir-e,s—s /i1( 5 VEIuIr�rJ u��oly1.�t V V'I � "•V ra DATE 70/ fk- COMMENTS PREPARED BY C.P.S. Form 11 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (in irate whether public or priv te). S. 151sT S`, ,cat SZ e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.)J f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known indicate when peak volumes would occur. }�(b -i- aORU(2L g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor- tation impacts, if any: 146011~L _ 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. , U� C c��< a ,�, F� 7J ( s 5`7LY -e.�r C%7.Q +.41-- -CA c re s / • n 0 s.{LS — b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Evaluation for Agency Use Only EXHIBIT "A" Tracts 3 and 4, Young's Half Acre Tracts, according to the plat recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page 37, in King County, Washington; EXCEPT for that portion thereof condemned in King County Superior Court Cause No. 594284 for State Highway No. 1; TOGETHER WITH that portion of vacated South 152nd Street which attached to said premises by operation of law, under City of Tukwila Ordinance No. 502, passed December 4, 1967. EI4ibit- "8" —• - -•• W3YIMllce t.ompany of Washington. It is furnished without charge solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the said premises. It does not purport to show all roads or easements. The Com- pany assumes no liability for inaccuracies therein. /06 /3c 9Cffi.Lt6 ( 1�T e a :7 * „.) 30 134 n it — dd•'i3 (Pleas, h /0 V. /06 S. 7 t' Meas.) 1 1 -.4 1 Jo .3D i z 6 647;11)6' rx /sa ->,►o e„i. £rc LOT DIMENSIONS ART' ACCORDING TO PLAT; EXCEPT! IIMEILE OTHERWISE INDICATED, • ST /2o 3 ,4 /20 I F'•'z{q Q VALI. N 97711 H AV $ ^+o`R _ a IpDTN 0 ND 01 SE - a-- 4- -t'--- •;�!;;��,�`,. 9 APSE I y i'i" >i/ `0\ / x� 14 I lot11Rk • +�i 109Th AV i qi h m , (ca�k� f ro ?, J a +m+1 AV N �w 110111 R R 9- d I s lalna w AV I III10 1101 �: .i 1 At 1 eV 10 .t...... A0 ., : 111711 IV S '� 1 YI p, a 1 w See Map 42 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM CN Of :35 EPIC A515- FILE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM TO: I I BLDG I I PLNG ( I P.W. I FIRE POLICE P & R PROJECT T, /1. �, t"ty VQ C1 J LOCATION pQQrJO7) of)67.15- FILE NO. DATE TRANSMITTED CJ- -(35- RESPONSE REQUESTED BY .STAFF COORDINATOR 1n1 -)() RESPONSE RECEIVED THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE.PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. 11 10-'7-5 ITEM COMMENT 8A HAS-THE MATTER OF EASEMENTS FOR STATE HIGHWAY WORK AND ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY TO THE NOR! H BEEN ADDRESSED: 15 PUBLIC SERVICES... POLICE THE EVENTUAL USUAGE OF THIS SPACE WILL HAVE POSSIBLE IMPACT UPON POLICE SERVICES...IF IT IS TO 3E USED ONLY TO PERMIT SEMI TRUCK ACCESS TO TSD BUILDING, IT WILL BE MINIMAL IF AT ALL. IF IT IS USED FOR OVERNIGHT PARKING AND /OR LONG /SHORT TERM STORAGE IT WILL BE AN INVITING TARGET FOR THIEVES AND JUST GENERAL TYPE VEHICLE PROWLERS. IF, STORE IS TO BE PERMITTED THIS DEPARTMENT DHOULD BE NOTIFIED FOR FURTHER REVIEW AND COEI , EN2 DATE 10/7/85 COMMENTS PREPARED BY pjl aVS . F rm 11 CITY OF TUKWILA CENTRAL PERMI.T SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ROUTING FORM 'TO: CN 050,335- EPIC ;q5 -$5 FILE BLDG ] PLNG ri P.W. W. [ I FIRE [j POLICE (i P & R PROJECT 'T,5, O. frLJ. va Cataan LOCATION pOr O)1 Q t516't FILE NO. .DATE TRANSMITTED q - -gs RESPONSE REQUESTED BY 10-'7-$5 STAFF COORDINATOR 1770 L. RESPONSE RECEIVED. THE ATTACHED ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAS RECEIVED REGARDING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE REVIEW AND COMMENT BELOW TO ADVISE THE RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL REGARDING THE THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FILE IS AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT THROUGH THE ABOVE STAFF COORDINATOR. COMMENTS REGARDING THE PROJECT YOU WISH CARRIED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, AND CITY COUNCIL SHOULD BE MADE ON THE ATTACHED CENTRAL PERMIT SYSTEM ROUTING FORM. ITEM COMMENT X10 , /&-er COMMENTS PREPA'ED : /71A, C.P.S. Form 11