Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit L03-012 - STARFIRE SPORTS / DEES BRUCE - FORT DENT PARK SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
L03 -012 STAR FIRE SPORTS FORT DENT PARK TO: City of Tuklvlla Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director June 5, 2003 NOTICE OF DECISION Bruce Dees, Applicant King County Assessor, Accounting Division Washington State Department of Ecology Agencies with Jurisdiction All Parties of Record This letter serves as a notice of decision and is issued pursuant to TMC 18.104.170 on the following project and permit approval. I. PROJECT INFORMATION Project File Number: L03 -012 Applicant: Bruce Dees for the Starfire Group Type of Permit Applied for: SHORELINE MANAGEMENT Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Project Description: : Construction of one new soccer field, improvement of four other soccer fields, construction of pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main and installation of athletic field lights within the Low Impact and High Impact environments of the shoreline. Location: Fort Dent Park Associated Files: E03 -009 Comprehensive Plan Designation Low Density Residential with Public Recreation Overlay Zoning District: Low Density Residential with Public Recreation Overlay II. DECISION SEPA Determination: The City SEPA Responsible Official has previously: determined that this application does not require a SEPA threshold determination because it is categorically exempt. determined that the project, as proposed, does not require a threshold determination under SEPA because it qualifies as a planned action pursuant to WAC 197 -11 -172, that the probable significant adverse environmental impacts of the project were adequately analyzed in the EIS previously prepared for the planned action and will implement the conditions and mitigation measures imposed by the planned action approval. determined that the project, as proposed, does not create a probable significant environmental impact and issued a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), or 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206- 431 -3665 Notice of Decision Starfire Shoreline Substantial Development Permit X determined that the project does not create a probable significant environmental impact if specific mitigation conditions are imposed on the project and issued a Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) requiring compliance with those mitigation conditions, or determined that the project creates a probable significant environmental impact and required preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the project. Decision on Substantive Permit: The City Community Development Director has determined that the application for a Shoreline Substantial Development Permit does comply with applicable City and state code requirements and has approved that application based on the findings and conclusions contained in the staff report. The Decision on this Permit Application is a Type 2 decision pursuant to Tukwila Municipal Code § 18.104.010. Other land use applications related to this project may still be pending. III. YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS One administrative appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board of the Decision is permitted. Any person appealing to the Shorelines Hearings Board may raise certain SEPA issues as part of the appeal to the Shorelines Hearings Board. Appellants should consult the rules and procedures of the Shorelines Hearings Board for details. IV. PROCEDURES AND TIME FOR APPEALING The requirements and procedures for appeals to the Shorelines Hearings Board are set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC 461.08. V. INSPECTION OF INFORMATION ON THE APPLICATION Project materials including the application, any staff reports, and other studies related to the Shoreline Substantial Development Permit are available for inspection at the Tukwila Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100, Tukwila, Washington 98188 from Monday through Friday between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The project planner is Carol Lumb, who may be contacted at 206 -431 -3661 for further information. Property owners affected by this decision may request a change in valuation for their property tax purposes. Contact the King County Assessor's Office for further information regarding property tax valuation changes. Department of Community Development City of Tukwila c:\mydocs\Starfire\NotDec.doc 2 Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION 1, L poi LJ0 HEREBY DECLARE THAT: Notice of Public Hearing Determination of Non - Significance Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance StuYth.►"'c Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Project Number: Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt )C / Notice of Action Person requesting mailing: Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 5 day of year 2005 in the P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: 51'✓ StuYth.►"'c cAks `k.“ be,oz orlia,,'Y .4 .,44,..44...- Project Number: — 0(2- Mailer's Signature: (4 a Person requesting mailing: P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM City of Tukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE (MDNS) File Number: [03 -009 Applied: 02/21/2003 Issue Date: 05/21/2003 Status: ISSUED Proponent: STARFIRE SPORTS Lead Agency: City of Tukwila Description of Proposal: Remodel of Fort Dent Park by the Starfire Group, including a new indoor soccer facility with 2 fields and accessory facilities, remodeling of the existing stadium with a covered grandstand and artificial turf, construction of six outdoor artificial turf soccer fields, and maintenance of four existing softball fields. Location of Proposal: Address: Parcel Number: Secti on/Townsh i p /Range: 6800 FORT DENT WY TUKW 2954900426 The City has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21c.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. The conditions for this SEPA Determination are amended at the end of this document. This MDNS is issued under WAC 197 -11 -350. The conditions are attached. Comments must be submitted by to - y - 03 . The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 15 days from the date below. For a copy of the appeal procedures, contact the City of Tukwila Department of Community Development. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd • Tukwila, WA 98188 (206)431 -3670 5 -21-03 Date Any appeal shall be linked to a specific governmental action. The State Environmental Policy Act is not intended to create a cause of action unrelated to a specific governmental action. Appeals of environmental determinations shall be commenced within the time period to appeal the governmental action that is subject to environmental review. (RCW 43.21C.075) doc: Miscperm E03 -009 Printed: 05 -21 -2003 City of 1�ukwila Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 File Number: [03 -009 Applied: 02/21/2003 Issue Date: 05/21/2003 Status: ISSUED SEPA Determination Conditions: 1: A parking management plan shall be developed and implemented. The plan shall include documentation that adequate parking facilities have been secured and that appropriate means of travel from parking to the site will be provided. The plan shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Community Development, which approval shall be obtained prior to occupancy of the proposed athletic building or the renovated grandstand. 2: A traffic and parking impact monitoring program shall be developed and implemented. The monitoring program shall address: Trip generation, Parking generation and parking demand /usage, Park usage, Average vehicle occupancy, and "Special Events." The-monitoring program shall identify monitoring timeframes and shall include appropriate commitments for mitigating any identified adverse traffic and parking impacts not previously mitigated. The monitoring program shall be developed and shall receive approval of the Director of Public Works prior to occupancy of the proposed athletic building or the renovated grandstand, and shall thereafter be implemented. Subsequent mitigation will be consistent with RCW 43.21C.060 and TMC 21.04.250. doc: Miscperm E03 -009 Printed: 05 -21 -2003 • Cizy of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Steve Lancaster, Director , FM: Carol Lumb, Senior PlanneIL RE: Shoreline Permit: L03 -012, Starfire Sports Complex at Tukwila Date: June 4, 2003 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project involves the enhancement of four soccer fields to replace grass playing area with synthetic turf and development of a new soccer field with synthetic turf, and construction of an additional sewer pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main within the shoreline environment. Lighting to illuminate the play fields will be installed to permit nighttime play at the fields. The work in the shoreline is one stage of a three -stage project to develop and improve Fort Dent Park. The City of Tukwila recently assumed ownership of Fort Dent Park under an agreement with the former owner; King County. King County had closed the park'due to budget constraints. Tukwila has subsequently entered into an agreement with Starfire sports under which Starfire will develop and operate portions of the park as soccer and softball facilities. The overall project on the park site includes the construction of a 74,500 sq. ft. building with two indoor soccer fields, restrooms, locker rooms, offices, pro -shop, training facilities, food concessions and other support functions; construction of a building housing restrooms, concession stands and maintenance facilities; construction of a cover over an existing grandstand; replacement of grass with synthetic turf on four existing soccer fields and the construction of two new soccer fields with synthetic turf. These activities are outside the shoreline environment and are not subject to this shoreline substantial development permit. 2. POLICIES OF THE SMA/SMP: The site is within the jurisdiction of the Tukwila Shoreline Management Program (SMP). This program was adopted in June, 1974 and amended March 16, 1982. The City's SMP was reviewed and approved by the State Department of Ecology as being consistent with the State Shoreline Management Act, adopted in 1971. The City's Shoreline Master Plan establishes three management zones adjacent to the Green/Duwamish River: River Zone: An impact buffer area which provides for resource protection, flood control maintenance, pollution control and landscape enhancement. This zone includes the first 40 feet from the mean high water mark. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206 - 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 I. II. Gity of Tukwila Steven M Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director FINAL STAFF EVALUATION FOR Starfire Sports Complex at Tukwila Case File # E03 -009 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposal includes development and improvement of former Fort Dent Park for athletic field and supporting facilities. Includes: construction of a 74,500+/- athletic building with two indoor soccer fields, restrooms, locker rooms, offices, pro -shop, training facilities food concessions and other support functions; construction of a restroom/ concession/ maintenance building; construction of a cover over an existing grandstand; addition of synthetic turf to four existing soccer fields; and development of three new synthetic soccer fields. GENERAL INFORMATION Project Name: Starfire Sports Complex at Tukwila Applicant: Starfire Sports Christopher G. Slatt, President and CEO Location: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan Designation: Notice: The project is located in Fort Dent Park, east of Interurban Avenue and North of Fort Dent Boulevard (adjacent to the Green River) in Tukwila, Washington. SW''ASec. 13 Twp 23N Rge 4E WM The current zoning for the subject site is Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Public Recreation Overlay (PRO). The current Comprehensive Plan for the subject site is Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Public Recreation Overlay (PRO). Notice of Application was issued on March 7, 2003. The following information was considered as part of review of this application. 1. 2. 3. SEPA Checklist received May 1, 2003. Endangered Species Act Screening Checklist received May 1, 2003. Starfire Sports Soccer Complex plan set prepared by Bruce Dees and Associates received 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 Shoreline Management Act Permit Data Sheet and Transmittal Letter From: City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Seattle, WA 98188 Date of Transmittal: June 5, 2003 Type of Permit: Substantial Development Local Government Decision: Approval Applicant Information: Name: Bruce Dees Address: 222 E. 26`h St. #200 Tacoma, WA 98421 Phone: 253- 627 -7947 Is the applicant the property owner? No Location of the property: Fort Dent Park Water Body Name: Green River Shoreline of Statewide Significance: Yes Environment Designation: Urban To: Department of Ecology Date of Receipt: Applicant's Representative: Name: The Starfire Group Address: 6840 Ft. Dent Way, # 125 Tukwila, Wa 98188 Phone: 206 - 431 -3232 Description of Project: Construction of one new soccer field, improvement of four other soccer fields, construction of pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main and installation of athletic field lights within the Low Impact and High Impact environments of the shoreline. Notice of Application Date: March 7, 2003 Final Decision Date: June 5, 2003 By: Carol Lumb, Senior Planner, City of Tukwila Phone Number: (206) 431 -3661 State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGN(S) I C rwO h- U " in (PRINT NAME) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on Co' / 5-IO3 the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and the other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 'Foil' bevcr QaaviC golva uJ so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way primary vehicular access to the property for application file number )_ 0 2 - 0 l2 1`io it puAl„„ z 444.2s txn Ouud e A-vp' 00(2 I herewith a thof the property ow se, 1 of . wila or it representative to remove and immediately dispose of the sign at the in a t er or u ou - ) days of a Notice letter. of rem Girpa Ap ature V Plcrzw, , rJUU On this day personally appeared before me to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he /she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes mentioned therein. SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington residing at My commission expires on City of ukwila • Department of Community Development / 6300 Southcenter BL, Suite 100 / Tukwila, WA 98188 / (206) 431 -3670 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1971 PERMIT FOR SHORELINE MANAGEMENT SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT File Number: L03 -012 Applied: 02/21/2003 Approved: 06/05/2003 Expiration: 06/06/2005 A permit is hereby granted to: BRUCE DEES FOR THE STARFIRE GROUP to: Remodel of Fort Dent Park by the Starfire Group. Work in the shoreline includes construction of one new soccer field with synthetic turf, remodel of four existing soccer fields to install synthetic turf, installation of athletic field lights and construction of a sewer pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main. This work is part of a larger project located outside the shoreline including a new indoor soccer facility with 2 fields and accessory facilities, remodeling of the existing stadium to construct a covered grandstand, and maintenance of four existing softball fields. Upon the following property: Address: 6800 FORT DENT WY TUKW Parcel Number: 2954900426 Section/Township /Range: NE 23 -23 -04 The following master program provisions are applicable to this development: Development under this permit shall comply with the following conditions. This permit is granted pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act of 1971 and nothing in this permit shall excuse the applicant from compliance with any other Federal, State or local statutes, ordinances or regulations applicable to this project, but not inconsistent with the Shoreline Management Act (Chapter 90.58 RCW). This permit may be rescinded pursuant to RCW 90.58.140(8) in the event the permittee fails to comply with the project as approved and any conditions thereof. CONSTRUCTION PURSUANT TO THIS PERMIT MAY NOT BEGIN AND IS NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (D.O.E.) AS DEFINED IN RCW 90.58.140(6) AND WAC 173 -14 -090, OR UNTIL ALL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS INITIATED WITHIN TWENTY -ONE (21) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SUCH FILING HAVE TERMINATED; EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN RCW 90.58.140(5)(a)(b)(c). 3vrQ 5 z o3 Date: Steve Lancaster, Director of Department of Community Development Construction or substantial progress toward construction must begin within two (2) years from the effective date of the permit (the date the permit is filed with D.O.E.), per RCW 90.58.143(4). doc: Shore1971 L03 -012 Printed: 06 -05 -2003 Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Low Impact Zone: A transition area intended to minimize physical and visual impact on the river zone while accommodating shoreline development. This zone includes the second 60 feet from the mean high water mark. High Impact Zone: An area to provide for more intensive use of the shoreline resource. This zone includes the area from 100 feet to 200 feet from the mean high water mark. The applicable policies of the City's Shoreline Management Program are set forth below .along with a discussion of the proposed project. City of Tukwila Shoreline Master Plan: Overall Goals: 1. Promote reasonable and appropriate use of the shorelines, which will promote and enhance public interest. 2. Protect against adverse effects against the public health, the land, its vegetation and wildlife and the waters and their aquatic life within Tukwila. 3. Protect public rights of navigation. 4. Recognize and protect private property rights consistent with public interest. 5. Maintain a high quality of environment along the shoreline of Tukwila. 6. Preserve and protect fragile natural resources and culturally significant features. 7. Provide safe and reasonable access for the public to the shorelines. 8. Recognize, protect, and improve aquatic habitats and spawning grounds of the Green River, which are invaluable natural resources. 9. Recognize, protect and improve those wildlife habitats which are valuable natural resources of the State. 10. Encourage recreational activities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river which benefit the public interest. Response: The site is Fort Dent Park, which until recently was a park in the King County park system and is now part of the City of Tukwila's park system. The Green River forms the boundary of this park on the south and the west. The park is currently developed with four soccer fields and four softball fields. An Army Corps of Engineers levee has been constructed along the length of the Green River shoreline on this site, which forms the southern and western boundary of the property. The Green River Trail runs along the top of the levee on the western side of the site. The current access to the shoreline - the Green River trail - on this site will not change as a result of the construction of the soccer field and enhancement of the four existing fields or the utility work that will take place in the shoreline. The public interest will be enhanced by the improvement of recreation opportunities at Fort Dent Park that will be available with the completion of the indoor soccer facility and the addition of three new 2 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit soccer fields, one of which is located in both the low impact and high impact environments of the City's shoreline and the improvement of the existing fields. The project will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. No culturally significant features have been identified on the site. The project will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. Economic Development Element Goals: 1. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila with minimum disruption of the environment. 2. Encourage economic development along shorelines that will result in long -term over short-term benefits for the river shoreline. 3. Recognize the quality of the existing economic activities along the river and discourage any future economic activities that may be of less quality. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along the shorelines is enhanced. 5. Encourage commercial development of public recreational facilities consistent with shoreline goals and policies. Response: The use of the site will not change, but intensify with the addition of one new soccer field in the shoreline and the enhancement of four others in the shoreline. The public /private partnership between the City and. Starfire will allow the continued use of Fort Dent as a park, as it will generate the revenues needed to maintain the park. The park site was developed by King County in the mid- 1970's with softball and soccer fields and a trail system that is used by bicyclists, pedestrians and runners. The trail system will not be affected by the soccer field enhancements. The completed indoor athletic facility will provide permanent employment for approximately 10 to 20 people depending on the level of sports activities at any given time. Construction of the new building and the field enhancements and construction will generate temporary construction jobs. The creation of the temporary and permanent jobs may enhance the quality of life for the residents of Tukwila if any of these jobs go to Tukwila residents. There will be spillover effects to the local economy when large soccer tournaments are held at the facility that require overnight stays at local hotels and meals at local restaurants. Public Access Element Goals: 1. Encourage safe, convenient and diversified access for the public to the shorelines of Tukwila. 3. Increase public access to publicly owned shorelines. 4. Encourage inland location of development so that access along shorelines is enhanced. 3 c :\rnydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: The goals of this section relate to providing public access to the river. There is a public trail system that runs the length of the Green River. In this portion of the river, the trail is located on the west side of the site, on top of the levee. Access to the trail will not change as a result of the proposed activities in the shoreline, although to the extent that more people come to the park for soccer or softball events, the opportunity for enjoying the shoreline will increase. The athletic structure that will be constructed is located well outside the shoreline environment. Circulation Element Goals: The Circulation Element of the City's Shoreline Master Program applies to the location of proposed major roads, transportation routes and other public facilities within the shoreline. The proposed project does not involve the location of any public roads. Access for vehicles to the park is from Interurban Avenue South through Fort Dent office park. Parking for 450 vehicles is provided. No revisions to the parking area within the shoreline environment are proposed. An additional pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main will be located adjacent to the existing force main and pump station. Recreational Element Goals: 1. Encourage recreational activities and related facilities unique to or dependent upon the use of the river, which benefit the public interest. 2. Encourage diverse, convenient and adequate recreational opportunities along the shorelines for the local residents and a reasonable number of transient users. Response: As noted above, a public trail system runs along the Green River on the western side of the park site. The remainder of the site is used for soccer or softball activities, which were established in the 1970's when the park was developed by King County. The use of the site for soccer will intensify with the completion of the new fields and the enhancements to the existing fields. Shoreline Use Element Goals: 1. Encourage appropriate development in suitable locations without diminishing the quality of environment along the shorelines of the river. 2. Shoreline activities should be consistent with the overall goals for development along the river. Response: An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee has been constructed along the south and western portion of the site. The property is currently developed with soccer and softball fields; the proposed action will create a new soccer field within the shoreline and enhance four other soccer fields that lie within the shoreline environment. The proposed use is a permitted use within the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning designations of Low Density Residential with a Pubic Recreation Overlay. 4 c: \mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt. d oc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Conservation Element Goals: • • 1. Encourage preservation of unique, fragile and scenic elements, and of non- renewable natural resources; assure continued utilization of the renewable resources. 2. Encourage the preservation of as much as possible of the natural character of the river and its shoreline. 3. Encourage the preservation of resources and ecology of the river and its shoreline. 4. Water quality in the river should be sufficiently high to permit human use and provide a suitable use and habitat for desirable forms of aquatic life. Response: The natural character of the river in the area of the proposed project has been altered to a major extent due to the construction of the levee to provide flood protection. The work that will take place on -site will not affect the stability of the levee. Fairly dense vegetation of mature trees already exists along the shoreline in the shoreline River Environment. Nineteen additional trees will be planted in the shoreline just outside the 30 -foot levee maintenance easement area in the Low Impact and High Impact environments. The soccer fields are not visible from the river as they lie below the levee. Oregon Ash and Aristocrat Flowing Pear are proposed to be located adjacent to the levee maintenance easement area. These tree choices will be coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to ensure their compatibility with the levee system. The Corps does not want trees with large root systems being located in or adjacent to the levee prism. 3. SHORELINE REGULATIONS: Following are the relevant review criteria as contained in the Tukwila Shoreline Regulations (Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 18.44) as applied by the City of Tukwila. A. TMC 18.44.110 General Shoreline Regulations All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. Response: The zoning on this parcel is Low Density Residential with a Public Recreation Overlay. The park is a permitted use in that zone. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the shoreline master program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. Response: Section 2, above, discusses the goals of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program and the compatibility of this project with those goals. 5 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfue Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. Response: No structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as part of an approved shoreline substantial development permit; Response: No removal of trees will occur in the river environment. Additional trees will be planted in the Low Impact and High Impact shoreline environments. The trees will be planted just outside a 30 -foot easement that has been granted to King County for access to the levee for maintenance purposes. As noted above, the type of tree to be planted will be coordinated with the Corps of Engineers to ensure compatibility with the existing levee system. 5. No effluent shall be discharged into the Green River, which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. Response: No effluent will be discharged into the Green River. The storm water drainage system will be directed to an existing storm water pond on site, where it is held and then discharged to the Green River. The replacement of natural turf with the synthetic turf will improve the quality of water collected in the storm water pond, as the installation of synthetic turf will greatly reduce the use of fertilizers on the existing lawn areas. Any additions to the storm water collection system will be designed and constructed in accordance with the standards and specifications of the King County Surface Water Design Manual. 5. All State and federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. Response: The project will comply with all State and federal water quality regulations. 6. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. Response: Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be altered by the construction of the new soccer field, the enhancement of four other fields and the addition of a second sewer pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main. 7. All perimeters of landfills or other landforms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. 6 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit Response: A land altering permit will be required for this project. Some earthwork associated with construction of the new soccer field and enhancement of the existing soccer fields will occur within the shoreline environment, however there will be no direct runoff to the river and no disturbance of the existing vegetation along the shoreline. 8. All necessary permits shall be obtained from federal, State, County or municipal agencies. Response: No federal permits are required, although the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will review the project to ensure that the trees proposed in the Low Impact environment will not impact the stability of the levee. The State Department of Ecology will review the shoreline permit. 9. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. Response: No dredging is involved with this project. 10. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: No mining is involved with this project. 11. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. Response: There is no disposal of solid waste along the shoreline. 12. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. Response: No property is proposed for acquisition with this project. The site is already a publicly owned facility. The enhancement and construction of new soccer fields will be a public /private partnership. 13. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. Response: This project does not propose any landfilling. 7 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit • • 14. ...(R)emoval of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. Response: There are no cottonwood trees proposed for removal on the site within the shoreline. B. TMC 18.44.130 Specific shoreline regulations — river environment. The River Environment consists of a 40 -foot wide management zone, measured from the mean high water mark. Uses in the River Environment are restricted to such uses as footpaths or trails, recreation facilities, dikes, bridges, or fire lanes. The River Environment on this site ends approximately 5 -8 feet from the landward catch point of the levee. No improvements or development are proposed within the River Environment on this site. The applicant is proposing to plant a mix of Oregon Ash and Aristocrat Flowering Pear in clusters just outside the 30. foot easement granted to King County as required by this section of the Shoreline Overlay district. C. TMC 18.44.140 Specific shoreline regulations — low impact environment The low impact environment consists of a 60 -foot wide management zone, beginning at the end of the river environment and proceeding 60 feet landward. Types of uses permitted in the low impact environment include structures not exceeding 35 feet in height, adequately screened or landscaped parking/loading and storage facilities, utilities, public or private streets or signs. The enclosed dumpster is located within the low impact environment on this site. TMC 18.44.140 B. states: Low impact environment uses shall conform to the following standards: 1. Structures shall be sited and appropriately landscaped in accordance with underlying zoning regulations; Response: The only structures that will be placed in the Low Impact environment are a second sewer pump station, a score board for the new soccer field on the south side of the site (Field #2) and field lights. The landscaping plan clusters trees in the area where the pump station will be located. The Low Density Residential district limits the height of all structures to 35 feet. The design of the scoreboard is not available as yet, but it will be required to comply with the regulations in effect at the time the permit is submitted. 2. Access roads shall be located no closer than ten feet to buildings, spur tracks or parking/loading and storage facilities, and the effective setback area shall be 8 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit suitably landscaped. This shall not prohibit ingress and egress points between an access road and the described facilities; Response: An asphalt path will be paved off the gravel path that runs along the top of the levee to provide access to field #1 from the south parking lot. Access to the site is via Interurban Avenue South and the existing Fort Dent office complex internal streets. No changes are proposed to the access streets. An access road for maintenance of the levee system is located along the top of the levee. 3. Parking, loading, and storage facilities shall be appropriately screened from the river with: a. A solid evergreen screen of a minimum six -foot height, or b. Decorative fence six feet high. (Note: Chain link fence shall be slatted and planted with ivy or other trailing vine except where a safety hazard may exist.), or c. Large hardy shade or fruit trees such as maple, alder, poplar, cottonwood, sycamore, willow, oak, beech, walnut, ash, birch or other species approved by the Director at a maximum of 30 feet on center, or d. Earth berms at a minimum of four feet high, suitably planted with live groundcover or natural grass; Response: No changes are proposed to the existing parking areas that are located in the Low Impact environment. 4. Railroad lead trackage shall be no closer than 15 feet to parking/loading and storage facilities, and shall be suitably landscaped. Response: There are no railroad tracks serving this site. Railroad tracks do run along the eastern boundary of the property. 4. COMMENTS: Comments were received during the Notice of Application period from the Seattle Cricket Club President and the Field Coordinator, both expressing concern about the impacts to the existing cricket pitch of development of the new soccer field (field #2). The applicant has entered into an agreement with the Seattle Cricket Club covering interim use of the facility and has offered to work with the Club to explore possibilities for long -term use of the redeveloped facility. 9 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 5. SEPA: A mitigated determination of non - significance was issued on May 21, 2003. The comment period closed on June 4, 2003; only one comment was received on the MDNS. Andy Levesque, of the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, wrote to make the City aware of the need for additional area to be dedicated to King County in the maintenance easement if the County is to continue maintaining the levee. A copy of the SEPA determination and staff report are attached (Attachment B.). CONCLUSIONS 1. The project site is designated Low Density Residential with a Public Recreation Overlay on the Comprehensive Plan map and zoned Low Density Residential with a Public Recreation Overlay. The proposed four soccer field enhancements and construction of a new soccer field, along with the sewer pump station and force main extensions are consistent with the land use and zoning designations. 2. The proposed use, recreational facility improvements is consistent with adjacent land uses. These uses consist of an office complex on the south across the river, the Green River on the east and west and office development across the river on the west. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 205 levee forms the property boundary on the west and south. • 3. The project will promote economic development in the City and will not interfere with the navigation of the Green River. 4. There are no culturally significant features on the site. Development of the site will not interfere with the aquatic habitat and spawning grounds found in the Green River. 5. Public access to the shoreline is available on the west side of the site on the Green River Trail, which meanders back and forth on either side of the river from Auburn north through the City of Tukwila. 6. The project is consistent with the General Shoreline Regulations set forth in TMC 18.44.110: A. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district and the use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted Shoreline Management Program. B. No structures or accessory facilities will be located over the river; C. The project will not disrupt existing trees or vegetation within the river environment. No cottonwood trees within the river environment or low impact environment will be removed. D. No effluent will be discharged into the Green River; storm water will be discharged into the existing stormwater pond and then ultimately discharged into the River. E. All state and federal water quality regulations will be strictly complied with. F. Wildlife habitat in and along the river will not be disturbed by the construction of this project. G. All necessary permits will be obtained for the project. H. No dredging or mining will occur with the project. 10 c :\mydocs\.Starfire\Shorerpt.doc Starfire Soccer Facility Shoreline Substantial Development Permit I. The site is a publicly owned park. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. J. No landfilling is proposed within the river channel. 7. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.130, river environment. No development is proposed in this portion of the shoreline. 8. The project is consistent with the requirements of TMC 18.44.140, low impact environment. A. The soccer field enhancements take place on four existing fields; one new field will be constructed. The utility improvements (sewer pump station and 6 -8 -inch force main) will serve the users of the soccer facilities. Nineteen additional trees will be planted in the Low Impact Environment to provide additional screening to that provided by the existing trees in the River Environment. The additional trees will be planted outside the 30 foot easement dedicated to King County for maintenance of the levee. B. No changes are proposed to the existing parking areas. C. No railroad tracks serve the site. 9. Comments were received from the Seattle Cricket Club expressing concern about the impacts of the development of the new soccer field to cricket pitch. The applicant has entered into an agreement with the Cricket Club covering interim use of the facility and has offered to work with the Club to explore possibilities for long -term use of the redeveloped facility. 10. A mitigated determination of non-significance was issued on May 21, 2003; one comment was received by the June 4, 2003 deadline. Andy Levesque, of the King County Department of Natural Resources and Parks, wrote to make the City aware of the need for additional area to be dedicated to King County in the maintenance easement if the County is to continue maintaining the levee. 6. RECOMMENDATION Approve the shoreline substantial development permit. 11 c:\mydocs\Starfire\Shorerpt.doc King County Department of Natural Resources Director's Office King; Street Center 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98100 -3855 June 4, 2003 Steve Lancaster Director, Department of Community Development City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: Fort Dent Park. Starfire Sports: Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (MDNS) File Number E03 -009 Dear Mr. Lancaster: This letter is in response to the endosed MDNS issued by the aty of Tukwila for the proposed Starfire Sports soccer facility project located at Fort Dent Park in Tukwila. While nothing in this letter should be interpreted as appealing the MDNS or otherwise opposing the soccer project proposal, I would like to take this opportunity to state several concerns I have with the project's impact on the existing flood containment levee system. These concerns center on the reasonable expectation of future levee maintenance or repair needs, especially regarding any future need to reconstruct portions of the levee system. To put these comments in context, please note that the project drawings show what is described on the plans as a 30' width levee maintenance easement. A review of the Title Report which accompanied recent transfer of Fort Dent Park ownership from King County to the City of Tukwila shows only a barely legible copy of a flood control easement (enclosed) for a levee recorded in favor of Drainage District One. The legal description of this easement references certain metes and bounds and a width, in places, measuring forty feet. It does not appear that the easement shown on the plans Is the same as that shown on the title report, nor is there any other easement of record for levee maintenance. Therefore, it Is unclear as to whether the plans are attempting to reference an existing, historic easement, or to propose a new one. If the latter, it is equally unclear in whose favor the proposed easement would be recorded. Prior to transfer to the City of Tukwila the levee was maintained as priorities and funding allowed, both by the King County River Improvement Fund, and by the King County Parks Department. Following activation of the Green River Flood Control Zone District ( GRFCZD) in 1990, pursuant to interlocal agreements between King County and the cities of Tukwila, Renton, Kent, and Auburn, levee maintenance needs at the Fort Dent Park were included in an overall inventory of Green River levee deficiencies. While the GRFCZD has accomplished over $7 Million in priority repairs to the Green River levees since that time, flood damages at Fort Dent have not yet been addressed. Several areas of undercutting erosion, oversteepening, and embankment slumping have been identified within the Fort Dent levee system as part of the ongoing listing and prioritization of levee repair needs. The bulk of these damages resulted from flooding conditions in 1990 and 1996. All such levee slope damages have been discussed with City of Tukwila engineering staff as part of the GRFCZD's annual work program and budget . development process, since 1990. The King County Parks Department completed a temporary repair to one slope failure area affecting part of the Green River Trail in 1999. The condition of the levee slopes and the status of levee damages were reviewed in the field with Tukwila engineering staff prior to transfer of the Fort Dent Park property to Tukwila. - Based on the interlocal agreements activating the GRFCZD, King County has agreed to use GRFCZD revenues as available to maintain and repair Green River levees in order of priority need, subject to certain conditions. First, the facility must be within an easement or ROW dedicated to King County. This stipulation was obviously met when the county held fee simple title to the park parcel. The easement provision for maintenance has been broadly interpreted where levees are within other public ownership or rights -of -way, as well. In such cases access and repair are accomplished through agreement with the affected city, such as through issuance of a ROW Use Permit, or a Special Use Permit, as appropriate to the setting. Such arrangements could readily be made with respect to future maintenance and repair of the Fort Dent levees as well, subject to other relevant conditions. One of these conditions is that the easement or ROW area in question must be sufficient to accommodate the needed maintenance repair construction. Geotechnical consultants for King County have previously determined the major cause of Green River levee slope failures to be slumping of saturated embankments following periods of high river discharge, during subsequent draw -down of the river stage. This failure mechanism appears to be fully consistent with those slumping failures previously noted within the Fort Dent levee system. Stable angles of repose incorporating appropriate factors of safety for levee embankments with respect to rapid draw -down failures require sufficient easement area to establish the levees at a slope of 2.5 horizontal feet for every vertical foot of levee height (2.5H:1V). The determination of this slope angle should be made starting at the toe of the levee slope where this intersects with the riverbed, and extending to the top of the levee itself. By observation, most if not all of the Fort Dent levee slopes below the elevation of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) have been steeply undercut by erosion, making it difficult to establish the actual toe of slope as a basis for measuring the needed easement widths. By graphically approximating these steep levee toe -slope angles and estimating an average flood scour depth of about ten feet for the Green River, it is possible to translate the measurement of the needed levee easement widths to begin with the OHWM itself. I have enclosed a rough sketch showing the approximate dimensions involved in determining the needed ROW widths for the levee system in this manner. Such widths must also include the entire levee fill prism with a minimum 16 -foot -wide driving surface, and the levee backslope built at a slope inclination no steeper than 2:H:1V. As you can see from this sketch, the current levee slopes do not provide the needed factors of safety for rapid drawdown conditions, as they are far steeper than the needed 2.5H:1V slope angles required. This, together with the presence of undercutting erosion, therefore explains why slumping failures of the levee slope have occurred during major flood flow conditions in the recent past. When the required 2.5H:1V slope angles are scaled onto the cross section sketch, it is apparent that the overall easement dimension needed to accomplish stable levee repair construction measures approximately 106 feet landward from the OHWM. For comparison I have also shown how the existing levees basically fit within a strip of land that measures 33 feet from the top -of -bank at the riverward edge of the levee. Please note that this measure entirely fails to account for either existing or needed angles of levee slope repose. For comparison, the stable levee location can be seen to lie almost entirely landward of the existing levee and narrow, 30- foot -wide ( + / -) type of easement shown on the proposed Starfire soccer complex plan drawings. Therefore, the ROW area needed for levee maintenance and repair at this site would require an additional width of approximately 40 feet This dimension can be determined by comparing the difference between the present levee alignment and the stable 2.5H:1V levee location shown in the cross section sketch, with both measured from the OHWM. As a related matter, please note that at several locations the proposed soccer field reconstruction is shown as being actually excavated Into the landward toe of the existing levee fill prism. A concrete retaining wall shown Is up to six feet in height to restrain this excavation. King County is-unwilling to undertake a responsibility for maintaining the flood containment function of any levees which may be compromised in this manner. In conclusion, I have gone to some lengths here to discuss the context within which levee maintenance agreements with King County may be relied upon for future maintenance and repair of the flood containment functions currently provided by the Fort Dent levee system. Should the City of Tukwila wish to rely on King County for this service in the future, a minimum levee easement width of 106 feet should be provided, measured from the OHWM along the length of the riverbank. This easement area should also be maintained free of structural modifications and encroachments, including the proposed concrete retaining structures. Alternatively, the City . of Tukwila may chose to arrange for alternate means of levee maintenance and flood containment protection at the Fort Dent site. Please cal me at 206 -296 -8379 if you have any questions regarding this letter, or the discussion herein. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sin erely Andrew T. Levesque Civil Engineer III Flood hazard Reduction Services Endosures Cc: Dave Clark, Manager, Flood Hazard Reduction Services Steve Bleifuhs, Green River Program Coordinator Ryan Larson, Senior Engineer, City of Tukwila Department of Public Works Public Works Department, Engineering Memorandum TO: Dave McPherson Brandon Miles FROM: Cyndy Knighton DATE: March 5, 2009 RE: Starfire Softball -to- Soccer Field Conversion Last year, Starfire submitted an application to convert the four existing softball fields into 4 soccer fields. This conversion is not part of the original development agreement which capped their mitigation costs. The first question at hand is whether this conversion is subject to the city's current concurrency test as well as possible payment of impact fees. Starfire has presented arguments that this conversion will actually generate less pm peak hour trips and is therefore not subject to the concurrency test and has no net new trips, meaning no impact fees are due. Multiple parking reports and studies have been submitted with the final piece sent in by their traffic engineer, Ken Oswell of Parsons Brinckerhoff. His letter dated February 12, 2009, shows a net reduction in pm peak hour trips. The letter references the November 2003 Parking Management Plan, which I have reviewed along with the updated Parking Management Plan. There are some significant discrepancies in the parking management plans, which was raised in an email to Brandon on December 10, 2008, and in my interpretation it appeared that there could be an additional 67 net new pm peak hour trips associated with this conversion. When Starfire first acquired the rights to use this parkland it was a recently acquired County park. The intent was to beef up the existing soccer fields, build a new soccer building with adjunct facilities, and convert the cricket fields to soccer fields. The four softball fields were to remain in place. Booking of the facilities was to become a Starfire responsibility with some city oversight and some percentage of the field times were to be reserved for "regular" non - soccer league use so that past patrons of the facility, as it existed then, could still use the park. In the February letter from Ken Oswell, a trip generation rate of 13.3 trips /field (in use) is presented. There is no documentation or justification provided for the trip generation rate used in this letter. Without justification, there is no reason for Tukwila to accept the trip generation presented and therefore trip generation rates revert to the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Using ITE, the pm peak hour trip rate for a county park is 0.06 trips /acre. This translates into an overall trip generation rate of 3 trips for the entire 51.46 acre Fort Dent Park. The portion of the park associated just with the softball fields is approximately 28% of the site, which would then have about 1 pm peak hour trip associated with it using the ITE trip generation rate. Using the ITE amount as the baseline, the net new p.m. peak hour trips associated with the proposed field conversion is 39 trips. This then clearly shows that this proposed conversion requires a concurrency test and payment of traffic impact fees. The concurrency test fee is $2,500 (all other uses, greater than 300,000 GFA) and the impact fee is $52,953.17 (39 trips x $1357.77 per trip). c: \temp\xpgrpwise \starfire softball -to- soccer field conversion 3- 5- 09.doc t:xatRES 07— !8- vow l Y EA 0 T-10 RS February 12, 2009 Mr. Brandon Miles Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 9818 -8548 RE: Starfire Sports Center Proposed Improvements Dear Brandon: PFCriniEn FEB 181009 DEvpi FEB Y 6 1009 DUELviunn f OPiLFgIyT As requested by the City, we have prepared this letter to summarize and confirm the PM peak hour trip generation estimated on an average day for the existing (previous) and proposed operation of the Starfire Sports Center located at Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Table 1 shows the estimated trips on an average weekday for the existing facilities. Table 2 shows the estimated trips on an average weekday for the proposed facilities. Table 1 — Previous PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario Facility Quantity Units PM In (vph) PM Out (vph) PM Totals Soccer Facilities in use 9 (of 10) Fields 61 33 94 Softball Facilities in use 3 (of 4) Fields 36 4 40 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Previous Trip Totals (a) : 110 61 171 Notes: (a) From November 2003 Parking Management Plan. Table 2 — Proposed PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario Facility Quantity Units PM In (vph) PM Out (vph) PM Totals Soccer Facilities in use 12 (of 14) Fields 77 44 121 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Proposed Trip Totals: 90 ° 68 158 The details of the proposed changes in facilities and operation of the Center are contained in the Updated Parking Management Plan (December 2008) previously submitted to the City. Please let me know if anything else is needed. Sincerely, PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Kenneth Oswell, PE Project Manager KOO:koo Over a Century of Engineering Excellence From: Brandon Miles [mailto:bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:24 PM To: Levesque, Andy Cc: Minnie Dhaliwal Subject: Starfire Permit Andy, Page 2 of 2 On April 25th the City sent the County a copy of the plans and the SEPA checklist for a project at the Starfire Soccer Complex at Fort Dent Park. The project involves the conversion of the existing softball fields into soccer fields. A portion of the work will be within 200 feet of the river. Since the fields are located near a river levee, the City thought it prudent to have King County comment during the SEPA and Shoreline process reviews. The City is preparing to issue a correction letter to the applicant on several items with the application and if the County has any concerns it would seem appropriate to include them in the City's comment letter. The City's comment letter will be going out on May 23rd. Please let me know if you have any concerns. The City wants to make sure that the concerns of all parties are addressed with this project. Best Regards, Brandon 3. Miles Senior Planner Department of Community Development City of Tukwila tel (206) 431 -3684 fax (206) 431 -3665 bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us file• / /C• \Tlnrnmentc anti Cettinac \Rrantlnn -M \T nral Cettinac \Temn \YPGrnWica \zRMShc (15 /')5MN1R Brandon Miles - RE: Starfire Permit From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Page 1 of 2 "Levesque, Andy" <Andy.Levesque @kingcounty.gov> "Brandon Miles" <bmiles @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "Jim Morrow" <jmorrow @ci.tukwila.wa.us> 05/21/2008 4:55 PM RE: Starfire Permit "Minnie Dhaliwal" <Minnie.tuk- mail @ci.tukwila.wa.us >, "Bleifuhs, Steve" < Steve.Bleifuhs @kingcounty.gov >, "Ryan Larson" <rlarson @ci.tukwila.wa.us> Brandon, My apologies for not responding to your request earlier. Time flies. My concerns with the proposal shown on the March 21, 2008 Composite Site Plan by Bruce Dees and Associates are as follows; 1. The plan sheet is in error regarding the location of the landward boundary of the King Count River Protection Easement with reference to Reserved Recording No. 20030106000779. The actual easement language establishes an easement measuring thirty feet landward from a stable top -of -bank location, not the existing top -of bank. To date, no firm engineering determination of the stable top -of -bank location has been completed. The existing bank has continued to settle and fail at several locations, however, especially near the northwest corner of Field No. 4, and should not be considered a sufficient basis to define this easement area. 2. Based on previous engineering studies completed in similar locations along the Lower Green River, it should be expected that the easement boundaries based on a yet- to -be- determined stable bank location will fall somewhere near the 110 ' OHW Setback and 125' OHW Setback lines labeled on the plan sheets. Planning for any future levee reconstruction should preserve these areas without encroachments. The current site development proposal largely accomplishes this result, except for the northeasterly corner of proposed Field No. 3. It appears that slightly repositioning Field Nos. 2 & 3 to the south would fully avoid encroachments, together with similar relocation of the newly proposed parking area south of Field No. 2. Thank you again for the opportunity to review this proposal. Let me know if you have questions concerning these comments. Andy Levesque 206 - 296 -8379 Engineer 3 Rivers and Floodplains Management Unit file•//('• \Tlnrnmentc and Cettinac \Rranrdnn -1VT\T nral CPttinac \Tema \YP(;rnWieP \1 .z1 1(1 (15/ 5/ "(1(152 • • Chris Slatt Page 1 of 1 From: Chris Slatt [chris @starfiresports.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:33 PM To: 'bholt @ci.tukwila.wa.us' Cc: 'Chris @starfiresports.com'; 'Steve Beck' Subject: Starfire Meeting 10/22 Hi Brenda, A meeting tomorrow would be really helpful to the project. Key agenda items for us are: 1. D03 -093 permit revision approval (hydrant location). 2. D03 -170 permit review status (Athletic Center) a. Starfire re- submitted last week b. Structural review (Reid Middleton) of metal building 3. Shoreline Permit (L03 -012) rriodification for PSE gas line 4. Final walk -thru /Permit approval process for use of fields (CO ?) 5. Retention pond pump failure /rented pump cost on 10/21/03 That's it. We'II see you at 8:30 am. Thanks Brenda. Chris 1(1 /71 /7fl(Y Carol Lumb - Re: Starfire Shoreline Per Page From: Minnie Dhaliwal To: Carol Lumb Date: 9/30/03 10:05AM Subject: Re: Starfire Shoreline Permit Hi Carol, As I understood it that Mike was looking at changing the route of the sewer line compared to what was originally approved. So instead of going towards Fort Dent Way it was going across the River towards Interurban Ave. If that is still the plan then it seems like we need to issue a revision to the shoreline permit. The natural gas is new. Were they not planning on having natural gas before? Dave McPherson came over and I asked if this was new or if there were existing conduits. He is going to check with Mike. And I think Steve may have had some conversations with Chris Slatt on this. Maybe we should check with him. Minnie »> Carol Lumb 09/29/03 05:56PM »> Hi there: Mike Cusick told me that the Starfire folks want/need to run a natural gas line across the river by hanging the line under the bridge that is located at the north end of the park. The shoreline staff report addresses the sewer pump station and force main that will be located in the Low Impact environment at the south end, but does not address the natural gas line. So, it seems like a revision to the shoreline permit will be needed to address the gas line if we view this as a "substantive change to the design...of the project." Would you view the addition of the natural gas line as a "substantive change ?" It seems to me it is a substantive change since there is no mention of any utilities being hung from the bridge for this project. Thanks for your thoughts. Carol STATE OF WASHINGTON RECEIVED , JUN 211003-„„ DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P.O. Box 47600 • Olympia, Washington 98504 -7600 (360) 407 -6000 • TDD Only (Hearing Impaired) (360) 407 -6006 June 18, 2003 Carol Lumb, Senior Planner City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 Bruce Dees The Starfire Group 6840 Ft. Dent Way #125 Tukwila, WA 98188 Dear Ms. Lumb and Mr. Dees: Re: Tukwila Shoreline Substantial Development Permit L03 -012 FORT DENT PARK- City of Tukwila- Owner; via Bruce Dees /STARFIRE GROUP, applicant Ecology Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 2003 -NW -50039 The subject Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, for enhancement of four soccer fields with synthetic turf and development of a new soccer field with synthetic turf, construction of an additional sewer pump station and 6 -8 inch force main, and installation of lighting for nighttime within the recreational shoreline environment has been filed with this office on June 5, 2003. The development authorized by the subject permit may not begin until the end of the 21 day appeal period, June 26, 2003. The Shorelines Hearings Board will notify you by letter if this permit is appealed. Other federal, state, and local permits may be required in addition to the subject permit. If this permit is not appealed, this letter constitutes the Department of Ecology's final notification of action on this permit. Sandra Lange, Shoreline 1`P anner Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program Cc: Ecology file BRUCE DEES& ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture • Urban Design Site Planning • Recreation Facilities Design May 19, 2003 Mr. Steve Lancaster City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 -2544 Dear Steve, RECEIVED MAY • 21 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Bruce Dees, FASLA, Principal Ruth Ann Allen, Principal Shawn Jensen, Associate Job No. 107 -01 -04 RE: Starfire Sports Complex You asked me to summarize the history of the stormwater pond at Fort Dent. Following is my understanding based upon my experience as the landscape architect for the initial development, and the record drawings I have in•my possession. The pond at Fort Dent Park was constructed as a stormwater pond in 1974 and has, been functioning as such ever since. The location was a natural low area within the site and did have standing water, but no vegetation other than grass at the periphery, as is shown in the early 'aerial photograph you have. The site was originally River View.Farm ", a dairy farm. When design for the park began, the farm was no longer functioning and the entire site was grass. The pond was cut in the present location. All the trees on the site and around the pond were planted. Even the cattails were introduced as shown on the drawing I provided you. Subsequent drainage improvements to the park have occurred over the years, with all water. ' directed to the stormwater pond, and there has been no question about its function as a stormwater pond to my knowledge. 1995 Addition to subdrainage to the softball fields. Tied into the'existing outfall entering, the pond from the north. • 1995 Expansion'of the •children 's play area added an outfall into the pond from the west. 1996 Conversion of the cinder soccer field to all - weather (sand). Tied into the existing storm sewer that flows into the pond via the stormwater lift station complex. 2000 Addition of subdrainage and connection to reclaimed water for irrigation-at the two southwest soccer fields. That too, ties into the existing storm sewer system that flows to the pond.. The approvals for those improvements by King 222 East 26th Street, .No. 202, Tacoma, WA 98421 (253) 627 -7947 FAX (253) 627 -6661 Web Site: www.bdassociates.com May 19, 2003 Page 2 County never questioned the use of the pond as a stormwater pond, as far as I know. All site stormwater flows to the pond and river via to the 96" storm manhole and lift,station. In the event the river is higher than Elevation 8.75, the lift station pumps kick in keeping the pond and'site from flooding. To my knowledge, the entire storm water system and pond has worked as designed and the site has never flooded. Our plan is to continue use of the storm water pond as an amenity to the park by retaining all trees around it and enhancing it by adding more. • Sincerely, Bruce Dees, FASLA Principal ABD:rma CITY OF TUKWILA NOTICE OF AP'P'LICATION PROJECT INFORMATION The Starfire Group has filed applications for development of a soccer complex to be located at Fort Dent Park. The complex will include a new indoor soccer facility with 2 fields and accessory facilities, remodeling of the existing stadium with a covered grandstand and artificial turf, construction of six outdoor artificial turf soccer fields, and maintenance of four existing softball fields. Permits applied for include: L03 -012 Shoreline Substantial Development E03 -009 SEPA Environmental Checklist Other known required permits include: Development Permit (site grading and building construction) Health Department Approval for food and beverage service Flood Zone Control Permit Stormwater Permit from the Washington Department of Ecology Studies required with the applications include: Traffic Impact Analysis Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Analysis Stormwater Downstream Analysis FILES AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW The project files are available at the City of Tukwila. To view the files, you may request them at the counter at the Department of Community Development (DCD), located at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard #100. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Your written comments on the project are requested. They must be delivered to DCD at the address above or postmarked no later than 5:00 P.M., April 7, 2003. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision, information on hearings, and your appeal rights by calling DCD at (206) 431 -3670. The Shoreline Permit may only be appealed to the State Shoreline Hearings Board. For further information on this proposal, contact Nora Gierloff at (206) 431 -3670 or visit our offices at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100, Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Application Filed: 2/21/03 Notice of Completeness Issued: 2/28/03 Notice of Application Issued: 3/7/03 voaaryvvp •viyornl '' d tun 'Po w zaidwoo .I233OS B .ZodS aJlllvlS 2i I Dept. Of Community Development City of Tukwila , AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I' L£4111._ HEREBY DECLARE THAT: • Notice of Public Hearing Project Number: LO?j -O( 7, Determination of Non - Significance Person requesting mailing: N O! i- Notice of Public Meeting Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance Board of Adjustment Agenda Pkt Determination of Significance & Scoping Notice Board of Appeals Agenda Pkt Notice of Action Planning Commission Agenda Pkt Official Notice Short Subdivision Agenda x Notice of Application Shoreline Mgmt Permit Notice of Application for Shoreline Mgmt Permit __ __ FAX To Seattle Times Classifieds Mail: Gail Muller Classifieds PO Box 70 - Seattle WA 98111 Other Was mailed to each of the addresses listed on this 7 7k day of /1AY&1. 4 in the year 20 03 P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Project Name: Tf.i 1 $TARFI REL GROUP Project Number: LO?j -O( 7, Mailer's Signature: L.Q. Person requesting mailing: N O! i- P:GINAWYNETTA/FORMS /AFFIDAVIT -MAIL 08/29/003:31 PM Ciz of Tukwila Steven M. Mullet, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director February 28, 2003 Judson Youell Bruce Dees & Associates 222 East 26t1i Street #202 Tacoma, WA 98421 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION RE: Starfire Sports Complex L03 -012 Shoreline Permit E03 -009 SEPA Environmental Review Dear Jud, Your application for construction of a soccer facility and fields located at Fort Dent Park has been found to be complete on February 28, 2003 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. You received information on how to install the sign with your application packet. If you need another set of those instructions, please call me. Once you have notified me that the notice board has been installed I will prepare a laminated copy of the Notice of Application for you to post and the comment period will start. After installing the sign with the laminated notice, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to our office. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. The City finds that additional review time will be necessary to process your permit application because the additional information requested by this letter is needed to complete the review process. The precise amount of additional review time which may be needed will be the number of days between the date of this letter and the submission of the additional information. This notice of complete application applies only to the permits identified above. It is your responsibility to apply for and obtain all necessary permits issued by other agencies. You should contact them directly to find out what their application requirements are. Q: \SF_Complete.DOC 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206- 431 -3670 • Fax: 206 - 431 -3665 I have routed your application materials to the other reviewing Departments and will collect their comments during the notice period. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at (206) 433 -7141. Nora Gierloff Planning Supervisor Q: \SF_Complete.DOC REVIEW GUIDELINE DISCUSSION GENERAL SHORELINE REGULATIONS (TMC 18.44.110) All uses within the shoreline overlay district must conform to the following general regulations: 1. The use is in conformance with the regulations of the underlying zone district. The site is zoned Low Density Residential with a Public Recreation Overlay. Public Parks are allowed under the Permitted Uses in this zone and Public Recreation Facilities are allowed under the Permitted Uses in a Public Recreation Overlay. 2. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. The use does not conflict with the goals and policies of the Shoreline Master Program or the provisions of the Shoreline Act and shoreline regulations. The use furthers the policies by improving water quality and providing enhanced recreational opportunities. It provides safe and reasonable access to the Green River shoreline. 3. No structures or accessory facilities shall be located over the river, unless such structure protects or promotes the public interest. No proposed structures or accessory facilities are located over the river. 4. There shall be no disruption of existing trees or vegetation within the river environment, unless necessary for public safety or flood control, or if allowed as a part of an approved Shoreline Substantial Development permit. No work is proposed riverward of the existing levee access road. 5. No effluents shall be discharged into the Green River, which exceeds the water quality classification as established by the State for the adjacent portion of the river. No effluents will be discharged into the Green River as a result of this project. 6. All State and Federal water quality regulations shall be strictly complied with. All State and Federal water quality regulations will be strictly complied with during construction and operation of the project. 7. Wildlife habitat in and along the river should be protected. No work is proposed riverward of the existing levee access road. No river habitat will be affected by the project. 8. All perimeters of landfills or other land forms susceptible to erosion shall be provided with vegetation, retaining walls or other satisfactory mechanisms for erosion prevention. Industry accepted erosion control measures will be taken during construction to prevent erosion. Plans submitted to the city will address the proposed measures. 9. All necessary permits shall be obtained from Federal, State, County or Municipal agencies. All required permits will be obtained from appropriate agencies. 10. Dredging for purposes other than for navigational improvements or flood control is prohibited. No dredging is proposed as part of this project. 11. Mining is prohibited along the river shoreline. No mining is proposed as part of this project. 12. Solid waste disposal is prohibited along the river shoreline. No solid waste disposal will occur along the river shoreline as part of this project. Once the project is constructed, all solid waste will be collected and hauled off -site by an approved solid waste contractor. 13. No property will be acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. No property has been acquired for public use without dedication by or just compensation to the owner. 14. Landfilling is prohibited within the river channel unless such landfill is determined by the Planning Commission to protect or promote the public interest. No land filling is proposed within the river channel as part of this project. 15. Notwithstanding any provisions of this Code to the contrary, removal of any cottonwood tree within the river environment or the low impact environment, which tree is 12 inches or greater in diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade, shall be subject to the requirements of TMC Chapter 18.54, Tree Regulations. No cottonwood trees located within the river environment or the low impact environment are proposed for removal as part of this project Please reference the goals and policies from the Tukwila Shoreline Management Plan that are applicable to your project. A list of goals and policies is available at the Tukwila Department of Community Development. Economic Development Element When complete, the project will considerably enhance four existing soccer fields and add three new fields to Fort Dent Park. It will enhance the quality of life for Tukwila residents by adding diverse recreational opportunities for a variety of users in a variety of age groups. Tournaments and other activities will bring added revenue to local businesses. The existing visual impact of the park will not be significantly altered by the project. Also, the visual impact of the park will be improved by the increased maintenance standards applied to the area. Public Access Element The project will not alter current public access to the Green River shoreline. The project will enhance public access by offering a safer, more conducive use in evenings with lighted facilities. Circulation Element Existing circulation leading to the park and circulation within the park will not be changed as a part of this project. Circulation along the existing levee access path will remain in its current condition providing public access along the Green River. Recreational Element The facility may provide on the premises for a range of field sports and community events, including but not limited to soccer, softball and baseball, rugby, lacrosse, and cricket. This facility will add new soccer fields to Fort Dent Park and will significantly enhance the existing soccer fields. The synthetic turf fields will allow for increased playing time over the existing natural turf fields. The indoor soccer fields, and soccer tennis courts will add diversity to the recreational opportunities available to area residents. This enhancement will provide a convenient and diverse recreational opportunity for a variety of Tukwila and Puget Sound area residents in a variety of age groups and economic levels. Shoreline Use Element The public use of the Green River shoreline through the park will not be affected by this project. Conservation Element The project will preserve the existing character of the Green River through the park. The project will not adversely affect the river environment. It will enhance the river environment through the reduced use of fertilizers and irrigation used to maintain the existing natural turf. Water quality in the river will not be impacted by the project. Historical / Cultural Element No known historical / cultural sites will be impacted by the proposed project. Imported clean structural fill will be used under the proposed building. Earthwork will not remove significant amounts of native soil. Fill material required for construction will be generated from on -site material placed over native soil. There are no known historical artifacts on the site. If any historic or cultural resources are encountered during construction or installation of improvements, the contractor will be instructed to halt work in the area and a stateapproved archaeologist/historian engaged to investigate, evaluate and /or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. February 21, 2003. 4. Traffic and Parking Analysis prepared by Entranco, dated April 29, 2003 and received May 1, 2003. 5. Stormwater Downstream Analysis prepared by Essayons Consulting Engineers, Inc., received February 21, 2003. 6. Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Evaluation, prepared by Bergquist Engineering Services, received February 21, 2003. 7. Agreement Between City of Tukwila and Starfire Sports dated February 28, 2003 8. South Area Park Phase 1A (1974) and 1B (1975) construction plans and as-built drawings and related letter from Bruce Dees and Associates dated May 19, 2003. 9. May 19, 2003 memo from Cyndy Knighton, Tukwila Public Works Department, to Steve Lancaster and Deb Ritter, re: Starfire Traffic Implact Analysis. NOTE: Technical reports and attachments referenced above may not be attached to all copies of this decision. Copies of exhibits, reports, attachments, or other documents may be reviewed and/or obtained by contacting the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, Washington, 98188, Phone: 206 - 431 -3685. III. REVIEW PROCESS The proposed action is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as the project does not meet the exemptions listed under WAC 197 -11 -800. IV. BACKGROUND/PROPOSAL The City of Tukwila recently assumed ownership of Fort Dent Park under an agreement with the former owner, King County. Tukwila has subsequently entered into an agreement with Starfire Sports under which Starfire will develop and operate portions of the park as soccer and softball facilities. V. REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The following lists the elements contained within the Environmental Checklist submitted for the proposed project. The numbers in the staff evaluation correspond to the numbers in the Environmental Checklist. If staff concurs with the applicant's response, this is so stated. If the response to a particular item in the checklist is found to be inadequate or clarification is needed, there is additional staff comment and evaluation. -2 A. BACKGROUND: 1 -6 Concur with checklist. 7 A revised Traffic and Parking Analysis dated April 29, 2003 was received by the city on May 1, 2003. 8 Concur with checklist. 9 In addition to the permits and approvals listed by the checklist, the following may be required: Flood Control Zone Permit — City of Tukwila NPDES Permit — Washington Department of Ecology 10 -11 Concur with checklist. 12 Tukwila's Sensitive Areas Map identifies a probable Type 2 wetland of approximately 1.5 acres on the project site. Further research indicates this is a constructed surface water detention pond built by King County in 1974 (see South Area Park Phase lA (1974) and 1B (1975) construction plans and as -built drawings). B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. Earth: Concur with checklist. 2. Air: Concur with checklist. 3. Water: a(1) -- Concur with checklist. a(2) —Work will also be performed within 200 feet of the above described detention pond. This work may involve re- contouring the existing ground in order to provide a more natural transition from the improved soccer fields to the pond, or a retaining wall located approximately 35 feet from the detention pond. a(3)- a(6)-- Concur with checklist. b (1) -b(2) -- Concur with checklist. 3 c (1) Project plans show surface water from new impervious surfaces being directed to an existing control structure /lift station which regulates flows to the detention pond and to the Green River. c(2) -- Concur with checklist. d -- Concur with checklist. 4. Plants: a Wet soil plants exist in and surrounding the detention pond. These plants were introduced during construction of the detention pond in 1974, apparently for both aesthetic and habitat enhancement purposes. c. Concur with checklist. d — Final landscaping plan shall meet all Tukwila Municipal Code landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a -d Concur with checklist. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 7. Environmental Health: a -b -- Concur with checklist. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a -d -- Concur with checklist. e Public recreation areas including but not limited to sports fields, community centers and golf courses are permitted uses. Applicant, as a not - for -profit entity, will continue to operate and maintain the existing and new facilities for public park and recreation purposes. Fees for use were charged previously by King County Parks and may continue to be charged. It has been detirmined that such activity does not constitute "commercial recreation." f -g Concur with checklist. 4 h —. The existing surface water detention pond is erroneously identified on the City's Sensitive Areas Map as a Type 2 wetland. This pond was created in 1974 to serve surface water detention needs for Fort Dent Park. Tukwila's Sensitive Areas ordinance excludes "constructed wetlands" from regulation unless they are created for the purpose of impact mitigation, which is not the case here. i-1 --Concur with checklist. 9. Housing: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 10. Aesthetics: a — Concur with checklist. b —Views from adjacent areas and from within the park will be altered by the construction of new buildings and modifications to the existing grandstand. c —Site and building design is subject to final approval of the Tukwila City Council. 11. Light and Glare: a-d -- Concur with checklist. 12. Recreation: a Concur with checklist. b The proposed athletic building will displace an existing cricket pitch. c The applicant has entered into an agreement with the Seattle Cricket Club covering interim use of the facility, and has offered to work with the Club to explore possibilities for long -term use of the redeveloped facility. (See March 24, 2003 letter signed by Steven A. Beck, Starfire V.P Operations, and counter signed on March 28, 2003 by Vipul N. Shah, Seattle Cricket Club President.) 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a -c -- Concur with checklist. 5 14. Transportation: a -d -- Concur with checklist. • e—The site is adjacent to the Burlington Northern and the Union Pacific railroad rights -of -way. The project will have no impact on rail operations. f The April 29 traffic analysis by Entranco estimates normal peak hour traffic generation of approximately 250 trips, with 376 peak hour trips occuring during special events a few days a year. There is capacity for even larger events to occur on- site from time to time. Peak events would occur primarily on weekends. Due to the unique nature of this facility, there is a lack of historical survey or other empirical data upon which to base trip generation and parking demand forecasts. The city's traffic engineer has recommended that a program for monitoring impacts be developed to ensure adequate mitigation. This monitoring program should cover: actual trip generation, parking generation and parking demand/useage, park useage, average vehicle occupancy and "special events." g The project is subject to the transportation concurrency requirements of the Tukwila Municipal Code, Chapter 9.48. 15. Public Services: a -The proposal will require general public safety services (emergency response). b— Compliance with building and fire codes will be required. 16. Utilities: a -- Concur with checklist. b— Any sewer and water service improvements necessary to meet public health and safety requirements must be completed prior to building occupancy. V. COMMENTS In response to the notice of application, written comments were received from Vipul Shah, President of Seattle Cricket Club (April 8, 2003) and Charles H. W. Benjamin, Field Coordinator for Seattle Cricket Club (April 9, 2003). Both letters express concern regarding impacts to the existing cricket pitch. 6 1 111011101 ��11 A 1 ��41 Bergq Engineering services 272b7 8th Avenue S P.O. Box 13309 a�tgsu/IQ.}nes, Washington 98198 Des Moines, Washington 98198 DEVELOFO`IlNe: 253.941.9399 • Fax: 253.941.9499 • E -mail: soilsengineering @aol.com March 28, 2008 Mr. Steve Beck Starfire Sports 14800 Starfire Way Tukwila, Washington 98188 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Services Starfire Expansion 14800 Starfire Way Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804, Report 1 Dear Steve: As requested, we have completed the subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering analysis for the referenced project. According to Bruce Dees of Bruce Dees & Associates, we understand that the project involves removal of the entire existing softball facility and construction of new grass and synthetic soccer fields. More specifically, the project includes: 1. Demolition of the existing structures and removal or abandonment of all existing utilities and likely the existing sub - drainages after stripping the existing sod. 2. Grading the site to nearly flat condition, 3. Constructing a new sub - drainage system that will double as infiltration trenches, and a detention system because the current flow to the pond cannot be increased, 4. The synthetic fields will likely include six to nine inches of permeable base rock over the subgrade and the grass fields. DOWN TO EARTH ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS Starfire Sports BES Project Number 200804 Tukwila, Washington March 28, 2008 To complete the design of the facilities, the following information and /or data are required by Mr. Dees to complete the design: 1. Estimate of high water table elevation. 2. Infiltration rate of the existing and constructed subgrade (using on -site material). 3. Shrinkage and compaction percentage of the onsite soil when regarded and compacted to 85% under the grass and 95% under the synthetic fields. 4. Design criteria for a small wall at the northeast corner approximately 4' high. 5. Review of the final design and specification. To provide the requested information, we excavated six test pits in the approximate locations shown on the attached SITE PLAN drawing on page Al of this report. The test pit locations were selected and marked in the field by Richard Bergquist. Prior to excavating the test pits, the underground utilities were located and marked by Utility Detection Services, LLC in accordance with state law. The test pits were excavated on March 19, 2008 to depths ranging from four (4) feet below existing grade to five and one -half (51) feet below existing grade with an Hitachi EX40 trackhoe. The in situ density of the soils in the test pits was determined at various depths using a nuclear density gauge in accordance with ASTM D2922. Bulk soil samples were taken at various depths and at obvious changes in soil -type for laboratory testing. Except for test pit number TP2, all test pits were backfilled with the excavated soils immediately after completion. The backfilled soils were placed on roughly one -foot thick lifts and each lift was compacted with a vibrating plate compactor to a density nearly equivalent to the original density of the soil. Test pit number TP 2 was left open for five and one -half hours to determine whether groundwater would infiltrate. TP 2 was then backfilled as described. The soil classification and stratification, as well as the results of the in situ density tests and moisture content tests, are presented on the Test Pit Logs on pages A2, A3, and A4 attached to this report. In addition to visual classification of the soils, laboratory testing included determination of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content in general accordance with ASTM D698 on three samples, determination of the particle size distribution in general accordance with ASTM D422 on three samples, and the natural moisture content in general accordance with ASTM D2216 of 15 soil samples. The results of the moisture /density relationship and particle size analysis are presented on. page A8 through A13. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 5 Starfire Sports BES Project Number 200804 Tukwila, Washington March 28, 2008 The following paragraphs present the results and or recommendations: 1. Estimate of high water table elevation. Though some seepage, which is interpreted as perched water, was encountered at a depth of two (2) feet in test pit TP5, groundwater was not encountered in any of the test pits. Groundwater was; however, measured as high as elevation 12.5 feet in an observation well installed on January 13, 2003 during the subsurface exploration for the new indoor soccer facility. Based on the reddish -brown mottling of the soils observed in the teat pits, we estimate that the groundwater fluctuates up to approximate elevation 13 feet in this area of the site. The groundwater level may fluctuate due to seasonal variations or other influences. 2. Infiltration rate of the existing and constructed subgrade (using on -site material). Based on the test pit data, the site soils are predominantly SILT (ML) or SILT -rich soils. A portion of the site (see test pit TP 3) is underlain by fine- grained SAND. Fine - grained SAND soils exhibit slightly higher hydraulic conductivities than SILT. Published estimates by Freeze and Cherry (1979), of hydraulic conductivity of the soil types encountered at this site are as follows: SILT (ML) Sandy SILT Fine SAND (SP) 0.1 to 1 gallon per day per square -foot 1 gallon per day per square -foot 1 to 10 gallons per day per square foot 3. Shrinkage and compaction percentage of the onsite soil when regarded and compacted to 85% under the grass and 95% under the synthetic fields. The following table summarizes the maximum dry densities of the soils at this site: 5011 TYPE MAXIMUM LABORATORY DRY DENSITY DRY DENSITY AT 85% COMPACTION DRY DENSITY AT 95% COMPACTION AVERAGE IN SITU DRY SHRINKAGE AT 85% COMPACTION SHRINKAGE AT 95% COMPACTION (Pc+) (KO (pci) DENSITY ( %) ( %) (KO SILT 89.5 76.1 85.0 88.6 +14 +4 Sandy 95.5 81.2 90.7 102.9 +21 +12 SILT SAND 93.5 79.5 88.8 106.4 +25 +17 Note that the dry density of the in situ soils exceed the proposed compacted densities, resulting in an increase in volume of soils as they are placed. Bergquist Engineering Services Page3of5 Starfire Sports BES Project Number 200804 Tukwila, Washington March 28, 2008 Moisture conditioning and compacting fine - grained soils such as the SILT -rich soils at this site is difficult. If SILT -rich soils reach moisture contents even slightly above optimum moisture they become unstable and "pump" under Toads. 4. Design criteria for a small wall at the northeast corner approximately 4' high. Conventional spread footing foundations may be used to support the proposed retaining wall. A continuous wall footing may be dimensioned using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 1,500 psf if it placed in the brown and gray clayey SILT encountered below a depth of about six (6) inches. Lateral earth pressures for design of foundations or short (four feet or Tess) retaining walls with level backfill and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below: Active: Undisturbed subsoils 40 psf /ft. Compacted granular soils 35 psf /ft. Passive: Continuous footings 250 psf /ft. Column footings 300 psf /ft. A coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.30 may be used to resist lateral foundation Toads. Footings and retaining walls should be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer should determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. A schematic of a cross section of a retaining wall is presented on page Al 4 of this report. 5. Review of the final design and specification. Review of the final design and specifications will occur when they are available. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 5 Starfire Sports Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200804 March 28, 2008 Thank you for this opportunity to work with you on your project. If you have any questions, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. EXPIRES : July 2008 Copies to: Addressee (2) Bruce Dees & Associates, LLC (3) Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering Services Richard A. Bergq s , P.E. Principal Attached: Al Site Plan A2 Log of Test Pits TP1 and TP2 A3 Log of Test Pits TP3 and TP4 A4 Log of Test Pits TP5 and TP6 A5 Test Pit Log Notes A7 Unified Soil Classification System A8 Laboratory Test Reports Al 4 Schematic of Cross Section of Retaining Wall Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 5 I Approximate Location of Test (Six test pits total) SITE PLAN Project Name: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila Washington Date: March 2008 Bergquist Engineering Services For: Starfire Sports BES Project Number: 200804 -1 Al Log of Test Pit 1 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 15.5' 1 2 3 4 5 6 BS1 BS2 ML ML ML SP 106.1/17.4 92.8/25.7 88.3/28.7 _Dark brawn,. lQOSe, dandy ..SILL trove .gravel_ &ropts. (Ts:4:1% 4. _ -- 28.7% 1 1 Brown to gray -brown SILT 2 Brown mottled reddish -brown SILT 2Q.3% 1 Brown fine SAND 3 4 END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. 1Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. 5 6 7 Log of Test Pit 2 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 16.4' BS1 1 BS2 2 3 4_ BS3 5 BS4 SM ML 107.4/9.2 • ..5%D.ark.brawn;SilixSAN , trace.groyel_ &foois_C.Tszpssil). 85.6/26.6 25.0 %1 Brown, fine- to medium - grained SAND 77.5/26.1 92.8/25.7 Brown, slightly mottled reddish -brown SILT to Clayey SILT 71.5/23.0 37.2 %1 27.9 %1 2 3 4 5 END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. 6 1Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. 7 6 7 A2 Log of Test Pit 3 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 16.6' Log of Test Pit 4 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 16.4' D p }fit � d n o yp umbr U$CS��a < Dry Density { d oisiu �o n ten {96 ,pl�, #, °t, . i% t ±54" t tJ. ' ."� � Descnpfion (Unified oil Classification ystein _ D2922 -- _ 1_ ML SP -__Dark. brQwo,. LQQSS. .S.andy_S.ILI,truce _grayel_ &rsafs. (_Tipsoill - -- _1_ _2_ 92.4/18.6 1— _ BS1 ML 23.6 %1 Brown SILT Dark _brown, Snndy_SJLI.with orgaoirs .(Belie Topsoil)_ _ -_ _3_ 87.2/10.4 . 3 BS2 BS2 ML 2 11.4 %1 — — — — 5 SM Brown, fine-grained SAND 3 — — 4 BS3 _6 6 — 1Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. 8.3 %1 4— END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. 5 6 Moisture Content by ASTM D2216 . _7_ 7 Log of Test Pit 4 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 16.4' D p }fit Sor /e Y 6O 4 /N\m \ o Dry nDe/)nysiity Moisture, Orr nt, D2422t Descnption (Unified or Classification System _ ML -- : - _ _Dark brown,. LQQSe, actntly_alLT� truce ,gr YeL&c rapt. (T ps9iI), - 1_ BS1 SP 104.7/19.9 7.,5%1 Brown fine- to medium - grained SAND ...1_ _2_ ML 96.4/19.7 Brown and gray Clayey SILT 2 _ Dark _brown, Snndy_SJLI.with orgaoirs .(Belie Topsoil)_ _ -_ _3_ 3 _4_ BS2 ML 76.8/14.9 24.0 %t Brown Sandy SILT becomes mottled reddish brown —4— 5 23.3% 5— _ END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. _6 6 — 1Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. _7_ 7 A3 Log of Test Pit 5 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 16.5' Log of Test Pit 6 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 19.4' s,« Depth' (fee 1,e,r,,v,:t.,04.4.e.k.'?.4,-,1,', pu%edAa M yP kCS\ymbo( ti §L� IU__'IS3, �GaMa, P',n'4'•i i t, Y „a'"�'�'' �t ':1- +� n "' o�stur,e s Con�.,ten X%) >�i` `"•�. ,� s s ,�,� r s � � �1 d � Description (Unified SoiI Classification System � � ._ _Dark brown,. LQQSe, _Ssindy_S.ILI,trace.groyel_cluoc & (.T_Qps911). _ - , ... D2922 _ BS1 ML -1.`, .4 °°J ..t xrkhrflwn,5a DO/ SILL .r-Qc�gcay. l.&EQQts (IopsQi!) - -- _1_ Brown to gray -brown SILT to Silty CLAY —2— _3_ 117.2/15.3 1- _ 3 GP Brown GRAVEL SAND occasional cobble _2_ Gray -brown SILT 4 1 14.7/13.7 _ o hr. 2- _ 25.1%1 5 99.5/21.6 '�` "` _3_ Gray SILT _s ML _7_ t Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. 7 Blue -gray SILT 3— _4_ BS2 68.7/43.4 20.8 %1 4— END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. _5_ 5_ _6_ 5 — 1Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. _7_ 7 Log of Test Pit 6 Project: Starfire Expansion Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200804 -1 Date Excavated: March 19, 2008 Excavation Rig: Hitachi EX40 Trackhoe Excavated By: GVE, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, P.E. Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 19.4' s,« Depth' (fee I \ype umb r kCS\ymbo( Dry Densrty { { Coontentre ntent b ASTMS ' r.D2922 Descnption (Unr ied Soil ass; 'cation System) � s r _ SM ._ _Dark brown,. LQQSe, _Ssindy_S.ILI,trace.groyel_cluoc & (.T_Qps911). _ - _1_ SP 98.5/18.2 Brown fine-grained SAND occ_ gravel and roots _1= —2— ML Brown to gray -brown SILT to Silty CLAY —2— _3_ 100.2/21.6 3 _4_ ML Gray -brown SILT 4 BS1 25.1%1 5 ML Gray SILT _s _6_ END OF TEST PIT. DRY AT COMPLETION. 6 _7_ t Moisture Content by ASTM D2216. 7 A4 TEST PIT LOG NOTES These notes and test pit Togs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The test pit logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the test pit on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal variations or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the test pit Togs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown on the Site Plan. The test pits were located in the field by estimating distances from existing site features. Elevations were interpolated from King County topographic information available from their website. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "BS" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the backhoe bucket. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the test pit. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the test pit Togs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. "V" Indicates location of groundwater at the time noticed. Indicates location of seepage of water and the time noticed. TERMS for RELATIVE DENSITY of NON - COHESIVE SOIL Tenn Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or Tess Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows /foot A5 TEST PIT LOG NOTES continued TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Strength Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons /square -foot Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1.00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2.00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8- inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074 to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50% fines. Fines are soils passing the # 200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well- graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve. GP Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. GM Silty GRAVELS, GRAVEL - SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines. SW Well-graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. SANDS More than half of coarse froction is smaller than No. 4 sieve. SP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. SM Silty SANDS, SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% fines SC Clayey SANDS, SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines Note: Coarse- grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE - GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% fines. Fines are materials passing the # 200 sieve) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS, very fine SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, Silty or Clayey SANDS SILTS and CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 CL Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity, Gravelly CLAYS, Sandy CLAYS, Silty CLAYS, Lean CLAYS OL Organic SILTS, or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS, Micaceous or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS, Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity, fat CLAYS OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PT PEAT, MUCK, and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note: Fine - grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the "A" Line and have a plasticity index (PI) of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services A7 MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT ZAV SpG 2.10 Curve No. 3647 Test Specification: ASTM D 698 -OOa Method A Standard Oversize correction applied to each point Preparation Method Hammer Wt. 5.51b. Hammer Drop 12 in. Number of Layers three Blows per Layer 25 Mold Size .03333 cu.ft. Test Performed on Material Passing No.4 Sieve NM 9.1% 11. NT P1 NT Sp.G. (ASTM D 864) Estimate % >NoA 2.4 % <No.200 10.1 USCS SP -SM AASHTO A -3 Date Sampled 3/19/2008 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 Date Tested 3/21/2008 Water content, % Tested By A. Duong TESTING DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM +WS 5785.0 5827.0 5872.0 5888.0 WM 4230.0 4230.0 4230.0 4230.0 WW +T #1 453.50 564.10 587.00 511.20 W0+T#1 400.90 487.80 498.20 426.40 TARE #1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WW + T #2 WD +T#2 • TARE #2 MOISTURE 12.8 15.3 17.4 19.4 DRY DENSITY 92.3 92.7 93.5 92.8 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Material Description Maximum dry density = 93.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 17.5 % 92.5 pcf 18.0 % Sample #3647: Gray native sand with silt USCS: Poorly graded sand with silt Remarks: Test Equipment ID: 1 Project No. 08 -0110 Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer • Location: Test Pit TP3 Checked by: W. Hansen Title: Project Manager MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. A8 PERCENT FINER Particle Size Distribution Report - ASTM D 422 /� W 90 � 1'l n 13 . i 4 % SILT 0.5 in. I % CLAY 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I i 87.5 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 'I I I I I • 111111111111111111 I 1 1 #4 • I • • I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I #40 93.2 #100 37.0 #200 10.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 80 80 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 ■ 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 70 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 60 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 50 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 40 1 1 ) 1 � I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 • 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 30 1 I I I i I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 J�! 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 10 a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 0 1 1 1 I ' 1 1 1 1 500 1001 10 1 01 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - % COBBLES % GRAVEL. % SAND % SILT 0.5 in. I % CLAY 0.0 2.4 87.5 10.1 0.25 in. 99.7 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (X=NO) 0.5 in. 100.0 0375 in. 100.0 0.25 in. 99.7 #4 97.6 #10 94.5 #40 93.2 #100 37.0 #200 10.1 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 3647 Source of Sample: Location: Test Pit TP3 Checked By: W. Hansen OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Soil Description Sample #3647: Gray native sand with silt USCS: Poorly graded sand with silt ,Atterbera Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NT LL= NT PI= NT Classification USCS= SP -SM AASHTO= A -3 Coefficients D85= 0.369 D60= 0.238 050= 0.197 D30= 0.127 015= 0.0860 010= Cu= Cc= Date Tested: 3/21/2008 Tested By: A. Duong Remarks Classification (ASTM D2487) Natural Moisture (ASTM D2216) Test Equipment ID: 5 Title: Project Manager Date Sampled: 3/19/2008 ElevJDepth: Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer Project No: 08 -0110 A9 MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT 93 91 .g 89 n 5 m v p 87 85 83 ZAV SpG 2.30 Curve No. 3648 Test Specification: ASTM D 698 -OOa Method A Standard Oversize correction applied to each point Preparation Method - Hammer Wt. 5.51b. Hammer Drop 12 in. Number of Layers three Blows per Layer 25 Mold Size .03333 cult. Test Performed on Material Passing No.4 Sieve NM 30.7% LL NT PI NT Sp.G. (ASTM D 854) Estimate % >No.4 0.2 % <No.200 90.3 USCS .ML AASHTO A -4(0) Date Sampled 3/19/2008 13.5 16.0 18.5 21.0 23.5 26.0 28.5 Date Tested 3/23/2008 Water content, % Tested By A. Duong TESTING DATA 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM+WS 5734.0 5782.0 5845.0. 5907.0 5909.0 WM 4228.0 4228.0 4228.0 4228.0 4228.0 WW+T#1 510.60 603.40 504.50 433.50 540.80 WD +T#1 438.50 508.50 416.10 348.10 427.70 TARE#1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WW +T#2 WD +T#2 TARE #2 MOISTURE 16.4 18.6 21.2 24.5 26.4 DRY DENSITY 85.9 87.0 88.6 89.5 88.3 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Material Description Maximum dry density = 89.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 24.0 % 89.5 pcf 24.0 % Sample #3648: Light gray silt with trace organics USCS: Silt Remarks: Test Equipment ID: 1 Project No. 08 -0110 Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 . Starfire Soccer • Location: Test Pit TP4 Checked by: W. Hansen Title: Project Manager MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Al0 PERCENT FINER Particle Size Distribution Report - ASTM D 422 C 00 90 80 70 80 50 40 30 20 10 0 % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT 0.5 in. 1 % CLAY 0.0 0.2 9.5 I I I 1 903 I I I I 99.9 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 99.8 I 1 I 1 #10 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I #100 95.8 #200 90.3 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 i I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I- I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I J I 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 l I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I 1 '1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I . I I I i I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 ; I I I 1 500 100 10 1 0 1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE - mm % COBBLES % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT 0.5 in. 1 % CLAY 0.0 0.2 9.5 903 0.25 M. 99.9 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (X =NO) 0.5 in. 100.0 0.375 in. 99.9 0.25 M. 99.9 #4 99.8 #10 99.8 #40 98.2 #100 95.8 #200 90.3 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 3648 Source of Sample: Location: Test Pit TP4 Checked By: W. Hansen Soil Description Sample #3648: Light gray silt with trace organics USCS: Silt Atterberg Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NT LL= NT PI= NT Classification USCS= ML AASHTO= A-4(0) Coefficients D85= D60= D50= D30= D15= D10= Cu= Cc= Date Tested: 3/23/2008 Tested By: J. Payseno Jr. Remarks Classification (ASTM D2487) Natural Moisture (ASTM D2216) Test Equipment ID: 5 Title: Project Manager OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer Project No: 08 -0110 Date Sampled: 3/19/2008 Elev./Depth: 10 to 24 inches All Dry density, pcf 100 98 96 94 92 90 MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT ZAV SpG 2.35 11.5 14.0 16.5 19.0 21.5 Water content, % 24.0 26.5 TESTING DATA Curve No. 3649 Test Specification: ASTM D 698 -OOa Method A Standard Oversize correction applied to each point Preparation Method Hammer Wt. 5.5 Ib. Hammer Drop 12 in. Number of Layers three Blows per Layer 25 Mold Size .03333 cu.ft. Test Performed on Material Passing No.4 Sieve NM 25.7% LL NT PI NT Sp.G. (ASTM D 854) Estimate % >No.4 0.0 % <No.200 64.8 USCS ML AASHTO A-4(0) Date Sampled 3/19/2008 Date Tested 3/23/2008 Tested By A. Duong ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Maximum dry density = 95.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 20.5 % 95.5 pcf 20.5% Material Description Sample #3649: Light brown native sandy silt USCS: Sandy silt Project No. 08 -0110 Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer • Location: Test Pit TP4 Remarks: Test Equipment ID: 1 MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Checked by: W. Hansen Title: Project Manager Al2 1 2 3 4 5 6 WM +WS 5835.0 5915.0 5973.0 5978.0 WM 4228.0 4228.0 4228.0 4228.0 1NW +T 41 516.40 519.00 568.70 612.50 WD +T#1 _ 452.30 439.00 470.10 495.80 TARE#1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WW + T #2 WD + T #2 TARE #2 . MOISTURE 14.2 18.2 21.0 23.5 DRY DENSITY 93.4 94.7 95.7 94.0 ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED Maximum dry density = 95.5 pcf Optimum moisture = 20.5 % 95.5 pcf 20.5% Material Description Sample #3649: Light brown native sandy silt USCS: Sandy silt Project No. 08 -0110 Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer • Location: Test Pit TP4 Remarks: Test Equipment ID: 1 MOISTURE DENSITY TEST REPORT OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Checked by: W. Hansen Title: Project Manager Al2 100 90 80 70 I.L W 60 Z Z 50 W U cc W 40 a 30 20 10 0 Particle Size Distribution Report - ASTM D 422 0 0 N — b 7 c�L O R r C 0.5 in. 100.0 I I 0.375 in. I 1 1 1 I #4 I I #10 99.9 #40 99.3 #100 93.6 #200 64.8 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 a ■ I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 1 I i I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I 1 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I I 41- 1 1 I 1, 1 1 1 I y 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 • GRAIN SIZE - mm 0.01 % COBBLES % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT 1 %CLAY 0.0 0.0 35.2 64.8 SIEVE SIZE PERCENT FINER SPEC.* PERCENT PASS? (X =NO) 0.5 in. 100.0 0.375 in. 100.0 0.25 in. 100.0 #4 100.0 #10 99.9 #40 99.3 #100 93.6 #200 64.8 (no specification provided) Sample No.: 3649 Source of Sample: Location: Test Pit TP4 Checked By: W. Hansen Soil Description Sample #3649: Light brown native sandy silt USCS: Sandy silt Atterberq Limits (ASTM D 4318) PL= NT LL= NT PI= NT Classification USCS= ML AASHTO= A-4(0) Coefficients D85= 0.122 060= D50= D30= D15= 010= Cu= Cc= Date Tested: 3/23/2008 Tested By: J. Payseno Jr. Remarks Classification (ASTM D2487) Natural Moisture (ASTM D2216) Test Equipment ID: 5 Title: Project Manager Date Sampled: 3/19/2008 Elev./Depth: 4.5 to 5 feet OTTO ROSENAU & ASSOCIATES, INC. Client: Bergquist Engineering Services Project: Bergquist Miscellaneous 2008 Starfire Soccer Project No: 08 -0110 A13 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION RECEIVED u u� 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tukwila, Washington DIVISION 2 - SITE CONSTRUCTION Section 02060 — Demolition Section 02100 — Temporary Erosion Control Section 02110 — Tree Protection Section 02230 — Site Clearing Section 02300 — Earthwork Section 02620 — Subdrainage Section 02621 — Top Sand Section 02630 — Storm Drainage Section 02740 — Hot -Mix Asphalt Paving Section 02741 — Porous Asphalt Concrete Paving Section 02790 — Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02792 — Plastic Lumber Section 02810 — Irrigation Section 02820 — Chain Link Fencing & Gates Section 02920 — Seeding Section 02930 — Planting DIVISION 3 — CONCRETE Section 03300 — Cast -in -Place Concrete TABLE OF CONTENTS Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 SECTION 02060 — DEMOLITION PART • 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY Bid Set RECFPIED Otto COMMUNITY DEVELOPACIENT Demolition Section 02060 A. This section includes demolition and removal existing site utilities. B. Related Documents 1. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections. 2. Sections 02230 — Site Clearing 3. Section 02300 — Earthwork 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. "Remove ": Detach items from existing construction and legally dispose of them off - site unless indicated to be removed and salvaged or recycled. B. "Remove and Salvage ": Detach items from existing construction and deliver them to Owner's representative. C. "Existing to Remain ": Existing items of construction that are not to be removed and that are not otherwise indicated to be removed, removed and salvaged, or recycled. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Proposed Protection and Control Measures: Submit statement or drawing that indicates the measures proposed for use, proposed locations, and proposed time frame for their operation. Identify options if proposed measures are later determined to be inadequate. Include measures for the following: 1. Environmental protection. B. Schedule of Demolition Activities: Indicate detailed sequence of demolition and removal work, with starting and ending dates for each activity and locations of temporary protection and means of egress. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Regulatory Requirements: Comply with governing EPA notification regulations before beginning work. 1. Comply with hauling and disposal regulations of authorities having jurisdiction. B. Standards: Comply with ANSI A10.6 and NFPA 241. DEMOLITION 02060 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Demolition April 21, 2008 Section 02060 C. Pre - Demolition Conference: Conduct conference on project site prior to start of work. Owner will provide meeting location. 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Owner assumes no responsibility for buildings and/or structures to be demolished. PART 2 - PRODUCTS Not used. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. When unanticipated mechanical, electrical, or structural elements are encountered, investigate and measure the nature and extent of the element. Promptly submit a written report to the Owner's Representative. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Existing Utilities: Locate, identify, disconnect, and seal or cap off utilities as required. 1. Arrange to shut off indicated utilities with utility companies. 2. If utility services are required to be removed, relocated, or abandoned, provide temporary utilities that bypass utilities to be demolished and that maintain continuity of service to other buildings /structures. 3. Cut off pipe or conduit a minimum of 2 feet below grade. Cap, valve, or plug and seal remaining portion of pipe or conduit after bypassing. B. Existing Utilities: Do not start demolition work until utility disconnecting and sealing have been completed and verified in writing. C. Temporary Shoring: Provide and maintain interior and exterior shoring, bracing, or structural support to preserve stability and prevent unexpected movement or collapse of construction being demolished. 3.3 PROTECTION A. Existing Items to Remain: Protect trees indicated to remain against damage during demolition (per Section 02110 — Tree Protection). DEMOLITION 02060 - 2 CO Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 ' Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Demolition Section 02060 3.4 DEMOLITION, GENERAL A. General: Demolish indicated existing structures and site improvements completely. Use methods required to complete the work within limitations of governing regulations and as follows: 1. Do not use cutting torches until work area is cleared of flammable materials. Maintain portable fire- suppression devices during flame - cutting operations. 2. Maintain adequate ventilation when using cutting torches. 3. Locate demolition equipment and remove debris and materials so as not to impose excessive loads on supporting walls, floors, or framing. B. Site Access and Temporary Controls: Conduct demolition and debris - removal operations to ensure minimum interference with roads, streets, walks, walkways, and other adjacent occupied and used facilities. 1. Do not close or obstruct streets, walks, walkways, or other adjacent occupied or used facilities without written permission from Owner and authorities having jurisdiction. Provide alternate routes around closed or obstructed traffic ways if required by authorities having jurisdiction. 2. Use water mist and other suitable methods to limit spread of dust and dirt. Comply with governing environmental- protection regulations. Do not use water when it may damage adjacent construction or create hazardous or objectionable conditions, such as ice, flooding, and pollution. 3.5 MECHANICAL DEMOLITION A. Equipment: Disconnect equipment at nearest fitting connection to services, complete with service valves. Remove as whole units, complete with controls. B. Below -Grade Construction: Demolish foundation walls and other below -grade construction. 1. Remove below -grade construction including foundation walls and footings completely. C. Existing Utilities: Demolish existing utilities and below grade utility structures that are within area for new construction including site work. Abandon utilities outside this area. 1. Fill abandoned utility structures with satisfactory soil materials according to backfill requirements in Division 2, Section 02300 — Earthwork. 3.6 EXPLOSIVES USAGE IN DEMOLITION A. Explosives: Use of explosives is not permitted. DEMOLITION 02060 - 3 m Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Demolition April 21, 2008 Section 02060 3.7 SI1')✓ RESTORATION A. Below -Grade Areas: Rough grade below -grade areas ready for further excavation or new construction. 3.8 REPAIRS A. General: Promptly repair damage to adjacent construction cased by demolition operations. 3.9 RECYCLING DEMOLISHED MATERIALS A. General: Separate recyclable demolished materials from other demolished materials to the maximum extent possible. Separate recyclable materials by type. 1. Provide containers or other storage method approved by Owner's Representative for controlling recyclable materials until they are removed from Project site. 2. Stockpile processed materials on -site without intermixing with other materials. Place, grade, and shape stockpiles to drain surface water. Cover to prevent windblown dust. 3. Stockpile materials away from demolition area. Do not store within drip line of existing trees indicated to remain. 4. Store components off the ground and protect from the weather. 5. Transport recyclable materials off Owner's property and legally dispose of them. B. Recycling Incentives: Revenues, savings, rebates, tax credits, and other incentives received from recycling building demolition materials shall accrue to Contractor. 3.10 DISPOSAL OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS A. General: Except for items or materials indicated to be recycled, salvaged, or otherwise indicated to remain on Owner's property, remove demolished materials from Project site and legally dispose of them in an EPA - approved landfill. 1. Do not allow demolished materials to accumulate on -site. 2. Remove and transport debris in a manner that prevents spillage on adjacent surfaces and areas. B. Burning: Burning of demolished materials is not permitted. 3.11 CLEANING A. Clean adjacent improvements of dust, dirt, and debris caused by demolition operations. Return adjacent areas to condition existing before demolition operations began. END OF SECTION 02060 DEMOLITION 02060 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Temporary Erosion Control Section 02100 SECTION 02100 — TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Work in this section includes: 1. Temporary erosion control, including catch basin fabric covers and erosion control fence. 2. Stabilized construction entrance. 3. Maintenance of erosion control measures. B. Related Sections: 1. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this section. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Erosion Control Plan: Submit an erosion control plan meeting the City of Tukwila Standards. 1. Identify erosion control measures to be used for each phase of construction. 2. The erosion control plan shall employ best management policies. 3. Minimal erosion control measures to be implemented at the commencement of construction are shown on the drawings. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 SILTATION FENCE A. Filter Fabric: Woven geotextile, Synthetic Industries 135st or approved equal, with a flow rate of 4 -8 gpm/ft2 (ASTM D- 4491), minimum trapezoidal tear (ASTM 4533) at 65 lbs., mullen burst of 300 psi (ASTM D3786) and puncture strength of 80 lbs. (ASTM D4833). 2.2 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A. Sieve Size Percent Passing 8" 100 3" 40 max lO max TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 02100 - 1 to Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Temporary Erosion Control April 21, 2008 Section 02100 2.3 CHECK DAMS A. 2 " -4" Rock: 100% passing a 4" square and 0 -5% passing a 2" square. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. Prior to overall site grading, clearing, or demolition, construct silt fence or construc- tion fence and maintain throughout project duration. 3.2 CATCH BASINS A. Insert layer of filter fabric between the frames and grates to minimize storm sewer system siltation. B. Monitor and periodically clean the filter fabric to ensure that water freely drains into the catch basin. 3.3 PROJECT CLOSEOUT A. Remove temporary silt fence or construction fence in accordance with the work sequence listed on the plan. END OF SECTION 02100 TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL 02100 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 SECTION 02110 — TREE PROTECTION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY Tree Protection Section 02110 A. Work in this Section includes: 1. Site photographic documentation. 2. Protection of existing trees. 3. Pruning of existing trees. 4. Tree replacement. 5. Removal of salvage material not used at the project clean -up. B. Related sections: 1. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this section. 2. Section 02230 —Site Clearing 3. Section 02300 — Earthwork. 1.2 SUBMITTALS A. Submit a tree protection plan for project work areas inside project Limit of Work. 1. Correlate plant protection to the project schedule. 1.3 WARNING A. Owner's Representative may ORDER THE WORK STOPPED if unauthorized use of protected area is occurring, or if tree protection fencing is not restored within 24 hours of notice to do so. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 TREE PROTECTION FENCING A. Six (6) foot height chain link fabric & 2" x 8 foot high steel stake posts TREE PROTECTION 02110- 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Tree Protection April 21, 2008 Section 02110 PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. Plant protection applies to trees to remain within the limit of Work and those which are in the vicinity of the limit of Work and which may be affected by construction activity. 3.2 Sl'1'E PHOTOGRAPHY DOCUMENTATION A. The Owner's Representative, together with a representative for the Contractor, shall photograph the site prior to construction to document original site conditions. This photo record will include, but not be limited to, existing trees to remain. 3.3 TREE PROTECTION A. Trees to be protected are designated on the Plans. Protect this vegetation against unnecessary cutting, breaking of branches, skinning or bruising of bark, breaking or skinning roots, root zone compaction, smothering of trees by stockpiling construction materials or excavated materials within drip line, excess foot or vehicular traffic, or vehicles parking within the drip line. 1. Provide temporary tree protection fence as specified to protect tree drip lines and vegetation to remain. B. Maintain all trees within project Limit of Work in a healthy and flourishing condition until Substantial Completion. 1. Protection and maintenance includes, but is not limited to: surrounding identified trees with tree protection fencing; aerating compacted soils; controlling surface runoff; expertly pruning and treating threatened or damaged branches and roots; and watering of trees and other vegetation as required to maintain their health during course of construction operations. C. From the first day of construction mobilization through the final site clean-up, have on- site the appropriate pruning tools such as pruning saw and a pair of loppers. D. Identify trees and plants to be removed on the Site prior to commencing work. 1. Bring any discrepancies between site conditions and Contract Drawings to the immediate attention of the Owner's Representative. 2. Mark trees and plants to be removed and obtain Owner's Representative's subsequent instruction for protection of adjacent plant materials. E. Carefully plan and execute operations to avoid damage to existing trees and plants scheduled to remain. F. Perform any heavy equipment work from angles and directions that minimize compaction to tree roots in the site area. TREE PROTECTION 02110 -2 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Tree Protection Section 02110 1. Under the supervision of the Owner's Representative, tie back all flexible limbs and overhead branches, which may, in the opinion of the Owner's Representative be damaged by equipment passage or activity. 2. No tree limbs may be removed without the prior written approval of the Owner's Representative. G. Protection of Existing Tree Roots and Vegetation: 1. Cut off roots cleanly with appropriate tool when roots are exposed due to grading and excavation activities. 2. Eliminate all tears and breaks in root surfaces. 3. Provide protection for roots over 1 -1/2" diameter that are cut during construction operations. Coat cut faces with an emulsified asphalt, or other acceptable coating, formulated for use on damaged plant tissues. 4. During time of exposure, temporarily cover exposed roots and keep moist with wet mulch and burlap or equivalent to prevent roots from drying out. Cover with earth as soon as possible. 5. Hand -dig trenches in areas with extensive roots. 6. Where possible, leave intact and undamaged roots larger than two (2) inches in diameter. Place utility conduit either under roots by tunneling or over roots with adequate bedding. 3.4 TREE PROTECTION FENCING LOCATION A. Locate tree protection fence generally one (1) foot out for every one -inch diameter of tree or trunk, but in no case closer than six (6) feet from the trunk of any tree. This area is considered the critical root zone (CRZ). The drip line is understood to be the line on the ground of points projected vertically from the ends of farthest branches of the tree. Stake fencing location and receive Owner Representative's final approval prior to fencing installation. 3.5 INSTALLATION OF TREE AND SITE PROTECTION FENCING A. Post Installation: 1. Install posts at 4' -0" o.c. spacing. 2. Drive posts deep enough to remain rigid during subsequent excavation and grading. 3. Do not compact soil inside the fence line during post installation. Do not use heavy equipment for this operation. B. Provide diagonal bracing to vertical posts at enclosures corners and wherever needed to ensure fence rigidity. C. Fence fabric shall be tight to grade at the bottom edge, and stretched uniformly between posts. 1. Top of fabric shall be a minimum of six (6) feet above grade. 2. Attached fabric to posts at 12" o.c. TREE PROTECTION 02110 - 3 m Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Tree Protection Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Tree Protection Section 02110 3.10 DAMAGES FOR LOSS OR INJURY TO EXISTING TREES A. Replace any and every tree lost or, in the opinion of the Owner's Representative, irreparably damaged as a result of failure of the Contractor to protect or to adequately maintain existing trees. 1. Trees which fail to fully foliate in the first or second spring following completion of construction operations may be presumed to have been lost due to construction operations. B. Replace trees with healthy specimens of the same species and size except where agreed otherwise in writing with the Owner's Representative. 1. Maintain and guarantee the health of replacement trees for one (1) full year from the date of installation. C. Completely remove and dispose of any tree lost or irreparably damaged as a result of Contractor's failure to protect or maintain trees to remain. D. In the event a damaged or lost tree cannot be replaced in kind, Contractor shall pay to the Owner as liquidated damages: 1) a sum equal to the value of each lost tree as determined by the most current Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants by the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, plus an amount of $1,500 per tree in compensation for the efforts of the Architect in administering and overseeing the replacement; OR 2) a sum of $8,000, whichever is larger. E. Locate and install replacement trees in accordance with the instructions of the Owner's Representative. The Owner's Representative is not bound to replace lost trees in the same location at their discretion. F. In the event of injuries to the crown, trunk or root system of any tree to remain resulting from the Contractor's failure to protect and/or maintain such tree, the Owner's Representative may elect to retain the tree and hold the Contractor liable for compensation, the just value of which is determined by the Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants. 3.11 PRUNING EXISTING TREES A. Repair trees and vegetation indicated to remain, which are damaged by construction operations, in a manner acceptable to Owner's Representative. 1. Employ a certified arborist to repair damages to trees and shrubs. 2. Allow trimming only after consultation with the Owner's Representative 3. All tree pruning shall be approved by the Owner's Representative. B. Limbs and branches that have been broken shall be cut off cleanly above the nearest crotch in accordance with good horticultural practice. 1. Sterilize equipment with alcohol prior to and during trimming and pruning operations. 2. Carry out all pruning of damaged trees to the complete satisfaction of the Owner's Representative. TREE PROTECTION 02110 -5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Tree Protection April 21, 2008 Section 02110 C. Ensure that existing trees remaining on the project site shall be in as good condition at completion of the work as at the commencement of the work. If such a condition does not exist at the completion of the work, Contractor assumes responsibility to provide corrective or replacement new material as directed by the Owner's Representative. D. All costs for the repair of any damage to trunks or major limbs three inches (3 ") in diameter or larger requiring, in the opinion of the Owner's Representative, the attention of a professional tree surgeon shall be borne entirely by the Contractor. 1. All costs incurred in existing tree protection shall be considered incidental to the contract. END OF SECTION 02110 TREE PROTECTION 02110 -6 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 SECTION 02230 — SIFE CLEARING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY Site Clearing Section 02230 A. This Section includes the following: 1. Protecting existing items to remain. 2. Removing trees and other vegetation. 3. Clearing and grubbing. B. Related Documents 1. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 MATERIALS OWNERSHIP A. Except for materials indicated to be stockpiled or to remain Owner's property, cleared materials shall become Contractor's property and shall be removed from the site. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Photographs or videotape, sufficiently detailed, of existing conditions of trees and plantings, adjoining construction, and site improvements that might be misconstrued as damage caused by site clearing. B. Record drawings according to Section 01770 — Closeout Procedures. 1. Identify and accurately locate capped utilities and other subsurface structural, electrical, and mechanical conditions. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Pre - Installation Conference: Conduct conference at Project site to comply with requirements in Division 1, Section 01310 — Project Management & Coordination. B. All work shall conform to applicable portions of the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction, 2008 Edition, and Standard Plans as prepared by the Washington State Department of Transportation and APWA, unless otherwise specified herein, on the plans, or as detailed. All workmanship and materials shall conform to these "Standard Specifications." Work required, but not listed within the attached bid proposal shall be considered incidental items and shall be included in the lump sum bid price. SITE CLEARING 02230 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Site Clearing April 21, 2008 Section 02230 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Reference Bench Marks and Monuments: Maintain benchmarks, monuments, and all other reference points. If disturbed or destroyed, replace in manner as approved without additional cost to Owner. B. Existing Utilities: Locate existing underground utilities in areas of work utilizing a private locator service. If utilities are to remain in place, provide adequate means of support and protection during earthwork operations. 1. Should uncharted, or incorrectly charted, piping or other utilities be encountered during excavation, consult utility owner immediately for direction. Cooperate with Owner and utility companies in keeping respective services and facilities in operation. Repair damaged utilities to satisfaction of utility owner. 2. Do not interrupt existing utilities serving facilities occupied and used by Owner or others, during occupied hours, except when permitted m writing by the Owner's Representative and then only after acceptable temporary utility services have been provided. C. Traffic: Conduct site clearing operations to ensure minimum interference with roads, streets, walks, and other adjacent occupied or used facilities. 1. Do not close or obstruct streets, walks, or other adjacent occupied or used facilities without prior written permission from Owner and authorities having jurisdiction. 2. Provide alternate routes around closed or obstructed traffic ways if required by authorities having jurisdiction. 3. Utilize only certified flaggers to maintain traffic flow. D. Protection of Existing Improvements: Provide protections necessary to prevent damage to existing improvements indicated to remain in place. E. Protect improvements on adjoining properties and on Owner's property. F. Restore damaged improvements to their original condition, as acceptable to property owners. G. Protection of Existing Trees and Vegetation: Protect existing trees and other vegetation indicated to remain in place (per Section 02110 — Tree Protection). H. Any clearing occurring beyond the clearing limits, as defined by the temporary erosion control fences and construction fences shown on the Plans, shall be restored to original conditions to the satisfaction of the Owner. Buffer areas will be restored to the appropriate wetland mitigation planting level. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING A. See drawings. SITE CLEARING 02230 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 PREPARATION Site Clearing Section 02230 A. Protect and maintain benchmarks and survey control points from disturbance during construction. B. Provide erosion - control measures (per Section 02100 — Temporary Erosion Control) to prevent soil erosion and discharge of soil - bearing water runoff or airborne dust to adjacent properties and walkways. C. Locate and clearly flag trees and vegetation to remain or to be relocated (per Section 02110 — Tree Protection). D. Protect existing site improvements to remain from damage during construction. 1. Restore damaged improvements to their original condition, as acceptable to Owner. 3.2 INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCING A. Locate as shown on the Drawings. 1. Owner's Representative shall review and approve proposed fence location in writing prior to fence installation. 3.3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING A. General: Remove trees, shrubs, grass and other vegetation, improvements, or obstructions as required to permit installation of new construction. Remove similar items elsewhere on site or premises as specifically indicated. "Removal" includes digging out and off -site disposing of stumps and roots. 1. Cut minor roots and branches of trees indicated to remain in a clean and careful manner, where such roots and branches obstruct installation of new construction (see also Section 02110 — Tree Protection). B. Catch Basins: Exercise care in work process to protect new and/or existing drainage systems, which are to remain, from infiltration of foreign materials through grates at catch basins. Install layer of filter fabric (per Section 02100 — Temporary Erosion Control) between the frame and grate to retain debris and allow drainage. C. Clearing Limits: Establish and clearly mark proposed clearing limits. 1. Once the clearing limits have been established call for inspection by the Owner's Representative. 2. Adjust the clearing as directed. Minor adjustments may be made to preserve /protect desired trees /vegetation. These adjustments and any additional clearing shall be considered as incidental to clearing and grubbing and 110 additional compensation will be paid. SITE CLEARING 02230 - 3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Site Clearing Section 02230 3. Once clearing limits are approved by the Owner's Representative or other Designated Authority, install temporary construction fence or erosion control fence. a. Removal of existing trees indicated to remain: All trees lying outside the clearing limits are to remain and are to be undamaged and undisturbed. Trees located outside the clearing limits which are removed or damaged beyond recovery shall be assessed to the Contractor per Section 02110, 3.10 for each tree over 3" caliper. D. Remove obstructions, trees, shrubs, grass, and other vegetation to permit installation of new construction. Removal includes digging out stumps and obstructions and grubbing roots (see also Section 02110 — Tree Protection). 1. Do not remove trees, shrubs, and other vegetation indicated to remain or to be relocated. 2. Cut minor roots and branches of trees indicated to remain in a clean and careful manner where such roots and branches obstruct installation of new construction. 3. Completely remove stumps, roots, obstructions, and debris extending to a depth of 18 inches below proposed subgrade. 4. Use only hand methods for grubbing within drip line of remaining trees. E. Fill depressions caused by clearing and grubbing operations with satisfactory soil material, unless further excavation or earthwork is indicated. 1. Place fill material in horizontal layers not exceeding 8" loose depth, and thoroughly compact to a density equal to adjacent original ground. 2. Place fill material in accordance with Section 02300 — Earthwork. 3.4 SITE IMPROVEMENTS A. Remove existing above- and below -grade improvements as indicated and as to facilitate new construction. B. Remove slabs, paving, curbs, gutters, and aggregate base as indicated. 1. Unless existing full -depth joints coincide with line of demolition, neatly saw -cu of existing pavement to remain before removing existing pavement. Saw -ci vertically. 3.5 REUSE & DISPOSAL A. Disposal: Remove surplus soil material, unsuitable soil, obstructions, den materials, and waste materials, including trash and debris, and legally dispose', off of the Owner's property. B. Burning: Burning of demolished materials is not permitted. END OF SECTION 02230 SITE CLEARING 02230 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 SECTION 02300 - EARTHWORK PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY Bid Set Earthwork Section 02300 A. This Section includes the following: 1. Grading to finish subgrade and preparing subgrades for walks, pavements, lawns, and synthetic turf fields. B. Related Documents 1. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. `Backfill ": Soil materials used to fill an excavation. B. "Borrow ": Satisfactory soil imported from off -site for use as fill or backfill. C. "Excavation ": Removal of material encountered above subgrade elevations. 1. "Additional Excavation ": Excavation below subgrade elevations as directed by Owner's Representative. 2. "Unauthorized Excavation ": Excavation below subgrade elevations or beyond indicated dimensions without direction by Owner's Representative. D. "Fill ": Soil materials used to raise existing grades. E. "Structures ": Footings, retaining walls, slabs, curbs, and electrical appurtenances, or other man-made stationary features constructed above or below the ground surface. F. "Subgrade ": Surface or elevation remaining after completing excavation, or top surface of a fill or backfill immediately below subbase, drainage fill, or topsoil materials. G. "Utilities ": include on -site underground pipes, conduits, ducts, and cables, as well as underground services within buildings. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Samples: 1. 'h cubic foot samples, sealed in airtight containers, of each proposed soil material from borrow sources. B. Material Test Reports: From a qualified testing agency indicating and interpreting test results for compliance with requirements indicated: EARTHWORK 02300 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Earthwork Section 02300 1. Sieve analysis by a certified testing laboratory of each material specified, showing the percent passing for each sieve size specified. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Pre- Excavation Conference: Conduct conference at Project site prior to any earthwork operations. 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Existing Utilities: Do not interrupt utilities serving facilities occupied by Owner or others unless permitted in writing by Owner and then only after arranging to provide temporary utility services according to requirements indicated: 1. Notify Owner not less than two days in advance of proposed utility interruptions. 2. Do not proceed with utility interruptions without Owner's written permission. 3. Contact utility - locator service for area where Project is located before excavating. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 SOIL MATERIALS A. Satisfactory Soils: On -site soil free of rock or gravel larger than 3 inches in any dimension, debris, waste, frozen materials, vegetation, and other deleterious matter. B. Unsuitable Soils: All other soils including: 1. Satisfactory soils not maintained within 2 percent of optimum moisture content at time of compaction. C. Borrow (WSDOT 9- 03.14): Provide import borrow soil materials when sufficient satisfactory soil materials are not available from excavations. Aggregate for gravel borrow shall consist of granular material, either naturally occurring or processed, and shall meet the following requirements for grading and quality: 1 square Size Percent Percent Passing 100 ' /a" square 25 min. U.S. No. 40 40 max. U.S. No. 200 7.0 max. Sand Equivalent 50 min. All percentages are by weight. 'If requested by the Contractor, the sieve size may be increased with the approval of the Engineer if it is determined that larger size aggregate will be satisfactory for the specified backfilling or embankment construction. EARTHWORK 02300 - Bruce Dees & Associat 02300 - 3 0 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Earthwork Section 02300 2. Excavation for Underground Mechanical or Electrical Utility Structures: Excavate to elevations and dimensions indicated within a tolerance of plus or minus one -tenth foot (0.10'). Do not disturb bottom of excavations intended for bearing surface. 3.5 EXCAVATION FOR WALKS AND PAVEMENTS A. Excavate surfaces under walks and pavements to indicated cross sections, elevations, and grades. 3.6 SUBGRADE APPROVAL A. Notify Owner's Representative when excavations have reached required subgrade. B. Cut Areas: After cutting to finish subgrade, proof roll subgrade at all cut areas to receive paving or structures with heavy pneumatic -tired equipment or a 2,000 lb. roller to identify soft pockets and areas of excess yielding. Do not proof roll wet or saturated subgrades. 1. Any soft cut areas identified by the Geotechnical Engineer, and if directed by the Geotechnical Engineer, shall be over excavated to a depth determined by the Engineer, the excavated material aerated, and the aerated material recompacted. 2. Payment for removal and recompaction shall be negotiated. 3. In the event the Geotechnical Engineer determines the existing soil to be unsuitable, the cost for removal and replacement with borrow shall be negotiated. C. Reconstruct subgrades damaged by freezing temperatures, frost, rain, accumulated water, or construction activities, at the Contractor's expense. 3.7 UNAUTHORIZED EXCAVATION A. Fill unauthorized excavation under foundations or wall footings by extending bottom elevation of concrete foundation or footing to excavation bottom, without altering top elevation. Lean concrete fill may be used when approved by Owner's Representative. 1. Fill unauthorized excavations under other construction or utility pipe as directed by Owner's Representative. 3.8 SOIL MATERIALS STORAGE A. Stockpile borrow materials and satisfactory excavated soil materials. Stockpile soil materials without intermixing. Place, grade, and shape stockpiles to drain surface water. Cover to prevent windblown dust. 1. Stockpile soil materials away from edge of excavations. Do not store within drip line of trees noted to remain. EARTHWORK 02300 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Earthwork April 21, 2008 Section 02300 3.9 BACKFILL A. Place and compact backfill in excavations promptly, but not before completing the following: 1. Surveying locations of underground utilities for record documents. 2. Inspecting and testing underground utilities. 3. Removing concrete formwork. 4. Removing trash and debris. 5. Removing temporary shoring and bracing, and sheeting. 6. Installing permanent or temporary horizontal bracing on horizontally supported walls. 3.10 FILL A. Preparation: Remove vegetation, topsoil, debris, unsatisfactory soil materials, obstructions, and deleterious materials from ground surface before placing fills. B. Plow, scarify, bench, or break up sloped surfaces steeper than 1 vertical to 4 horizontal so fill material will bond with existing material. C. Place and compact fill material in layers to required elevations. Under footings and foundations, use engineered fill. 3.11 MOISTURE CONTROL A. Uniformly moisten or aerate subgrade and each subsequent fill or backfill layer before compaction to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content. 1. Do not place backfill or fill material on surfaces that are muddy, frozen, or contain frost or ice. 2. Remove and replace, or scarify and air -dry, otherwise satisfactory soil material that exceeds optimum moisture content by 2 percent and is too wet to compact to specified dry unit weight. 3.12 COMPACTION OF BACKFILLS AND FILLS A. Place backfill and fill materials in layers not more than 8 inches in loose depth for material compacted by heavy compaction equipment, and not more than 4 inches in loose depth for material compacted by hand- operated tampers. B. Place backfill and fill materials evenly on all sides of structures to required elevations, and uniformly along the full length of each structure. C. Compact soil to not less than the following percentages of maximum dry unit weight according to ASTM D 1557: 1. Under impervious pavements, compact each layer of backfill or fill material at 95 percent. 2. Under synthetic fields and porous asphalt, compact each layer of backfill or fill material at 92 percent. EARTHWORK 02300 - 5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Earthwork Section 02300 3. Under the grass field or unpaved areas, compact each layer of backfill or fill material at 85 percent. 3.13 GRADING A. General: Uniformly grade areas to a smooth surface, free from irregular surface changes. Comply with compaction requirements and grade to cross sections, lines, and elevations indicated. 1. Provide a smooth transition between adjacent existing grades and new grades. 2. Cut out soft spots, fill low spots, and trim high spots to comply with required surface tolerances. B. Site Grading: Slope grades to prevent ponding. Finish subgrades to required elevations within the following tolerances: 1. Lawn or Unpaved Areas Outside the Fence: Plus or minus one -tenth foot (0.10'). 2. Impervious Pavements: Plus or minus five- hundredths foot (0.05'). 3. Athletic Fields and Porous Asphalt Walks: Plus 0.00, minus one -tenth foot (0.05'). 3.14 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Testing Agency: Owner will engage a qualified independent geotechnical engineering testing agency to perform field quality control testing. B. Allow testing agency to inspect and test subgrades and each fill or backfill layer. Proceed with subsequent earthwork only after test results for previously completed work complies with requirements. C. Footing Subgrade: At footing subgrades, at least one test of each soil stratum will be performed to verify design - bearing capacities. Subsequent verification and approval of other footing subgrades may be based on a visual comparison of subgrade with tested subgrade when approved by Geotechnical Engineer. D. Testing agency will test compaction of soils in place according to ASTM D 1556, ASTM D 2167, ASTM D 2922, and ASTM D 2937, as applicable. Tests will be performed at the following locations and frequencies: 1. Paved Slab Areas: At subgrade and at each compacted fill and backfill layer, at least one test for every 2,000 sq. ft. or less of paved area or slab, but in no case fewer than three tests. 2. Trench Backfill: At each compacted initial and final backfill layer, at least one test for each 150 feet or less of trench length, but no fewer than two tests. Does not include drainage trenches. E. When testing agency reports that subgrades, fills, or backfills have not achieved degree of compaction specified, scarify and moisten or aerate, or remove and replace soil to depth required; recompact and retest until specified compaction is obtained. EARTHWORK 02300 - 6 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 3.15 PROTECTION Earthwork Section 02300 A. Protecting Graded Areas: Protect newly graded areas from traffic, freezing, and erosion. Keep free of trash and debris. B. Repair and reestablish grades to specified tolerances where completed or partially completed surfaces become eroded, rutted, settled, or where they lose compaction due to subsequent construction operations or weather conditions. 1. Scarify or remove and replace soil material to depth as directed by Owner's Representative; reshape and recompact. C. Where settling occurs before Project one -year warranty period elapses, remove finished surfacing, backfill with additional soil material, compact, and reconstruct surfacing. 1. Restore appearance, quality, and condition of finished surfacing to match adjacent work, and eliminate evidence of restoration to the greatest extent possible. 3.16 DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS AND WASTE MATERIALS A. Disposal of Surplus Satisfactory Soil: See drawings. B. Remove: Waste material, including unsuitable soil, trash, and debris, and legally dispose of it off Owner's property. 3.17 BORROW A. Determine quantities of cut and fill. In the event there is insufficient on -site fill material, use import borrow under the synthetic turf field or paved surfaces only. Import borrow shall not be used as fill in any of the planted areas. The cost for import borrow shall be incidental to the lump sum contract price. END OF SECTION Q2300 EARTHWORK 02300 - 7 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Subdrainage Section 02620 SECTION 02620 — SUBDRAINAGE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS C. (PP) Perforated polyethylene 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: For drainage conduit, drainage panels, and geotextile fabrics. 1. Perforated HDP pipe (HDP) and fittings. 2. Perforated polyethylene pipe (PP) and fittings. 3. Drainage aggregate. B. Submit composite data sheets on all materials. See Part 2 "Sampling of Permeable Materials ", for submittal requirements. PART 2- PRODUCTS 2.1 GENERAL A. All materials used in the drainage system shall be new and of the type specified. A. Perforated polyethylene pipe (PP ) shall be virgin manufactured in accordance with ASTM F -405, Standard ySpecifications for Corrugated Polyethylene Tubing and Fittings. y 2.2 POLYETHYLENE PIPE AND FITTINGS SUBDRAINAGE 02620 -1 CO Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Subdrainage April 21, 2008 Section 02620 B. Pipe shall be flexible with circumferential ribbing for maximum strength. For perforated pipe (PP) the perforation shall be a minimum of three rows at 120- degree angles. Perforations shall be of the "saw -cut" variety or of sufficiently small circular holes to not permit passage of pea gravel. C. Fittings shall be of the same manufacture as the pipe - p pe and shall be of the "snap on" type. D. Lengths of tubing shall be joined by split couplings. Tape for wrapping of split couplings shall be polyethylene material. E. Corrugated - perforated pipe and corrugated pipe shall be Advance Drainage System (ADS) or approved equal. 2.3 HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDP) AND FITTINGS A. Perforated HDP drain pipe and fittings shall be High Density Polyethylene (HDP) conforming to ASTM F405, Standard Specifications for Corrugated Polyethylene Tubing and Fittings. HDP pipe shall be AASHTO M252, Type S smooth interior, corrugated exterior pipe, N -12, manufactured by Advanced Drainage Systems; Hi -Q pipe as manufactured by Hancor, Inc. or approved equal. Fittings shall be of the same manufacture as the pipe and shall be of the "snap -on" type. Lengths of tubing shall be joined by split couplings. 2.4 CATCH BASINS A. See Section 02630 "Storm Drainage ". 2.5 DRAINAGE AGGREGATE A. All aggregate used in the drainage trench shall be pea gravel, washed, per the following: 1. Pea Gravel Sieve Size % Passing #1/2 100% #3/8 95 -100% #5/16 80 -90% #1/4 10 -50% #4 1 -10% #8 0 -1% B. Drainpipe aggregate gravel shall be used as the envelope around the corrugated polyethylene drain piping • from the bottom of the pipe trench to the level of the existing native material subgrade. 2.6 SAMPLING OF PERMEABLE MATERIALS A. Prior to the importation of any of the permeable materials, the Contractor shall provide the Owner with a V2 cubic foot sample and with a certified test lab report of the sieve analysis of the product listing compliance with the same sieve sizes specified. Owner shall be the final determining factor in establishing compliance with sieve requirements. No material shall be brought onto the job site until the initial sieve analysis has been approved by the Owner, in writing. The testing laboratory shall be an independent, professional laboratory, approved by the Owner. SUBDRAINAGE 02620 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Subdrainage April 21, 2008 Section 02620 B. During the course of importation of the permeable materials, the Contractor shall be responsible for continually checking the materials to insure that they continue to meet the Specifications. Failure to do so may require that the Contractor remove non - qualifying material from the site at his own cost. The Owner will have the option to take random samples for testing at their own laboratory. In the event that any sample taken and tested by the Owner reveals that non - qualifying material is being imported, the Contractor shall cease all importation until the Owner is assured that the Contractor is meeting the specifications. In the event that the Owner's sieve analysis and the Contractor's sieve analysis are at variance, and either analysis reveals the material to be non - complying, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the services of a third party professional testing laboratory, which, in turn shall analyze samples selected by the Owner. Such analysis shall be turned over to the Owner for resolution. C. The certified test lab reports required in paragraph above, shall be submitted by the Contractor as early as possible to avoid potential delays in the Contract due to sample rejections. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 FINISH SUBGRADE Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 3.4 POLYETHYLENE PIPE INSTALLATION Subdrainage Section 02620 A. Polyethylene drainpipe shall be uncoiled and cut to length and then permitted to remain in the uncoiled position until excessive set induced by coiling is relieved. Pipe shall be laid on the bed to grade and held to prevent displacement. Pipe shall be end - capped at the ends. Pipe shall be coupled with snap -on couplings to ensure locking of the couplings and shall be wrapped with two wraps of polyethylene tape (one tape width). 3.5 HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE INSTALLATION A. Install piping beginning at low points of system, true to grades and alignment indicated, with unbroken continuity of invert. Bed piping with full bearing in drainage aggregate. Install couplings according to manufacturer's written instructions and other requirements indicated. END OF SECTION 02620 SUBDRAINAGE 02620 -4 to Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Storm Drainage A. HDP: Corrugated high- density pe. of eth lene pipe. Y Y p 1.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. All workmanship and materials shall be in accordance with the latest edition of the ' Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (WSDOT /APWA). The Standard Specifications, except as they may be modified or superseded by the City of Tukwila Development Standards and/or these plans, shall ' govern all phases of work. B. Fees and Permits: Obtain and pay for all required permits for work under this section. 1.5 SUBMITTALS ' A. Submit composite data sheets on all manufactured materials including: 1. Pipe 2. Catch Basins ' 3. Frame and Grates B. Submit samples and certified test results on bedding. ' PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 PIPING A. HDP Sewer Pipes and Fittings: 4 " -10" AASHTO M -2525 12" AASHTO M294S. STORM DRAINAGE 02630 - 1 ' © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Storm Drainage April 21, 2008 Section 02630 B. HDP Perforated Pipe and Fittings: 4 " -10 "AASHTO M -252S perforated, 12" AASHTO M -294S. 2.2 CATCH BASINS A. Catch Basins: 1. Type II WSDOT Std. Plan indicated on the drawings. 2. Type II Catch Basin/control structure as indicated on the drawings. 2.3 GRATES AND FRAMES 1. Round Solid Cover: See drawings. 2.4 TIGHTLINE PIPE BEDDING A. Pipe bedding shall consist of crushed, processed, or naturally occurring granular material. It shall be essentially free from various types of wood waste or other extraneous of objectionable materials. It shall have such characteristics of size and shape that it will compact readily and shall meet the following specifications for grading and quality: Sieve Size Percent Passing 1" square 100% ' /a" square 25 -80% U.S. No. 200 15.0 Max. Sand Equivalent 35 Min. 2.5 TRENCH BACKFILL A. Trench backfill shall be excavated native material. Suitable native material shall be free from mud, muck, organic matter, broken pavement, rocks greater than 6" dimension, and other deleterious material, and must be capable of compaction to the required density at the time of placement. If the native material cannot be readily compacted to a specified density, Bank Run Gravel shall be utilized and any insufficiently compacted native material shall be removed and replaced with Bank Run Gravel. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL A. Call underground locate line at 1- 800 - 424 -5555 for field location assistance with the public right -of -way a minimum of 72 -hours prior to any excavations. Retain a private locater service to locate utilities within the project site. B. Before any construction or development activity, a preconstruction meeting must be held between the Contractor, the City's Inspector, and other appropriate parties. STORM DRAINAGE 02630 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Storm Drainage Section 02630 only by an approved testing laboratory at the Contractor's expense. All test results and analyses shall be promptly given to the City Inspector. The City STORM DRAINAGE 02630 - 3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Storm Drainage Section 02630 reserves the right to contract with an independent testing laboratory for testing of trench backfill. This testing shall also be done at the Contractor's expense. 6. When, after excavating for pipes to the foundation level, the material remaining in the trench is unsuitable, as determined by the City Inspector, excavation shall be continued to such additional depth as may be required by the City Inspector. Unsuitable foundation material shall be replaced with foundation gravel conforming to Section 9 -03.17 of the Standard Specifications. 7. The Contractor shall furnish, install, and operate all necessary equipment to keep excavations above the foundation level free from water during construction, and shall dewater and dispose of the water so as not to cause injury to public or private property or nuisance to the public. 8. Sufficient pumping equipment in good working condition shall be available at all times for all emergencies, including power outage, and shall have available at all times competent workmen for the operation of the pumping equipment. 3.3 PIPE BEDDING A. Bedding shall be placed as detailed. 3.4 SHORING A. The requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and the Washington Industrial Safety and health Act of 1973 (WISHA) shall apply to all excavation, trenching, and ditching operations on this project. All trenches over four (4) feet in depth shall be shored, braced, and shielded in compliance with applicable Federal and/or State regulations. Shoring, bracing, or shielding shall be required in all street area excavations, including those areas where all existing pavement is being removed. Sloping to the angle of repose will be permitted only in non - critical, off - street areas. B. Shoring and cribbing of excavations and trenches shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of Section 2 -09 of the Standard Specifications. C. The shoring system shall be a commercially available shoring system designed for the depths anticipated on the project. The shoring system shall meet all requirements of the Washington State Safety and Health Act ( WISHA) and United States Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA). 3.5 PIPE LAYING A. Pipe laying shall comply with the Standard Specifications (WSDOT). STORM DRAINAGE 02630 - 4 CO Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Storm Drainage April 21, 2008 Section 02630 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 3.9 CLEANING Storm Drainage Section 02630 A. Cleaning shall comply with Standard Specifications (WSDOT), Section 7- 17.3(4). END OF SECTION 02630 STORM DRAINAGE 02630 - 6 0 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Section 02740 SECTION 02740 - HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. Provide hot -mix asphalt paving according to materials, workmanship, and other applicable requirements of Standard Specifications of State or Local DOT. B. This Section includes the following: 1. Crushed rock surfacing and path. 2. Hot -mix asphalt paving. 3. Hot -mix asphalt patching. 4. Soil sterilant. C. Related Sections include the following: 1. Division 2, Section 02300 — Earthwork, for aggregate sub -base and base courses and for aggregate pavement shoulders. 2. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. Hot -Mix Asphalt Paving Terminology: Refer to ASTM D 8 for definitions of terms. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. All workmanship and materials shall be in accordance with the latest "English" unit edition of the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (WSDOT /APWA). The Standard Specifications, except as they may be modified or superseded by the City of Tukwila Development Standards and these plans, shall govern all phases of work. B. Manufacturer Qualifications: 1. Manufacturer shall be a paving -mix manufacturer registered with and approved by authorities having jurisdiction of the DOT of the state in which Project is located. C. Testing Agency Qualifications: Qualified according to ASTM D 3666 for testing indicated, as documented according to ASTM E 548. D. Asphalt - Paving Publication: Comply with AI MS -22, "Construction of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements," unless more stringent requirements are indicated. E. Pre - Installation Conference: Conduct conference at Project site to comply with requirements in Division 1, Section 01310 — Project Management and Coordination. HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING 02740 -1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Section 02740 asphalt paving including, but not April 21, 2008 Review methods and procedures related to hot -mix limited to, the following: 1. Review condition of subgrade and preparatory work 2. Coordination with site furnishing installation. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data for Sterilant: Include technical data and tested physical and performance properties. B. Job -Mix Designs: For each job mix proposed for the Work. C. Samples: 1/2 cubic foot crushed rock base. D. Material Test Reports: Sieve analysis from a certified testing laboratory showing conformance to the sieve sizes listed. 1.5 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Deliver pavement marking and soil sterilant materials to Project site in original packages with seals unbroken and bearing manufacturer's labels containing brand name and type of material, date of manufacture, and directions for storage. B. Store pavement marking and soil sterilant materials in a clean, dry, protected location within temperature range required by manufacturer. Protect stored materials from direct sunlight. 1.6 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Environmental Limitations: Do not apply asphalt materials if subgrade is wet or excessively damp or if the following conditions are not met: 1. Asphalt Base Course: Minimum surface temperature of 40 degrees F and rising at time of placement. 2. Asphalt Surface Course: Minimum surface temperature of 60 degrees F at time of placement. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 CRUSHED ROCK BASE COURSE A. Top Course: Five - eighths inch (5/8 ") minus top course shall meet the requirements as outlined in Section 9- 03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING 02740 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Section 02740 B. Base Course: One and one - quarter inch (11/4") minus base course shall meet the requirements as outlined in Section 9.03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. 2.2 ASPHALT MATERIALS A. Asphalt paving shall conform to 5 -04, 9 -02, and 9 -03 of the Standard Specifications. 1. Parking Lot and Road Shoulder Asphalt Paving: Class B. 2.3 CRUSHED ROCK PATH A. Base for Asphalt and Crushed Rock Path: One and one - quarter inch (1 1/4") minus base course shall meet the requirements as outlined in Section 9.03.9(3) of the Standard Specifications. B. Top Course for Crushed Rock Path: One - quarter (1/4 ") minus shall meet the following specifications: Sieve % Passing 1/ 100% #10 40 -75% #200 10 -15% 2.4 JOINT SEALER A. AR -4000 Joint Sealer. 2.5 SOIL STERILANT A. Casaron pre- emergent herbicide, or approved equal. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Verify subgrade is completed to correct line and grade before starting work. B. Verify that subgrade is dry and in suitable condition to support paving and imposed loads. 3.2 SUBGRADE A. Prepare subgrade in conformance with Section 02300 Earthwork. HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING 02740 -3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 3.3 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE Bid Set Hot Mix Asphalt Paving Section 02740 A. Constructed crushed surfacing base shall be in accordance with Section 4 -04 of the Standard Specifications. 3.4 CRUSHED ROCK PATH A. Construct as detailed and in accordance with Section 4 -04 of the Standard Specifications. 3.5 SOIL STERILANT A. Apply sterilant herbicide in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations over crushed surfacing base of asphalt. Notify the Owner 24 hours in advance of sterilant application. No sterilant shall be applied without the Owner's Representative present. Apply sterilant to specified areas only, and under no circumstances shall it be sprayed on other areas. 3.6 ASPHALT A. All Paving: Construct in accordance with Section 5 -04 of the Standard Specifications. B. Obtain approval of crushed surfacing base course prior to paving. 3.7 SAWCUT JOINTS A. Sawcut existing and new joints between paving. 3.8 JOINT SEALING A. Seal butt joints between new and existing paving. 3.9 PAVEMENT MARKING A. Prepare surface in conformance to Section 8 -22 of the Standard Specifications. Paint only when air and surface to be painted temperatures are above 50 degrees F. Line width shall not vary more than plus or minus 1 /a ". 3.10 ASPHALT FINISHED EDGE A. All asphalt surface pavement edges will be at true alignment and width as indicated on the plans. HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING 02740 -4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVING 02740 -5 m Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 B. Gradation: Bid Set Porous Asphalt Concrete Paving Section 02741 1. Aggregate to meet the following particle size limitations: Sieve Size % Passing by Weight 3 /4" 'h" 100% 3/8" 95 -100% No. 4 30 -50% No. 8 5-15% No. 30 No. 200 (wet sieve) 0 -3% 2.2 POROUS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT A. General: 1. This mix is intended to have an acceptable balance between adequate and uniform permeability and strength. 2. The amount of liquid asphalt used in the formulation must be precisely controlled to obtain the desired strength while not adversely affecting the permeability. B. Asphalt cement content shall be 5.5% by weight. 2.3 AGGREGATE BASE A. Base Course: One and one - quarter inch (1 'A ") minus base course shall meet the following requirements: Sieve Size Base Course Percent Passing 1 'A4" square 100 1" square 80 -100 3/4" square 5/8" square 50 -80 1/2" square U.S. No. 4 25-45 U.S. No. 40 3 -18 U.S. No. 200 7.5 max. % Fracture 75 min. Sand Equivalent 40 min. All percentages are by weight. The fracture requirement shall be at least one fractured face and will apply to material retained on each specifica- tion sieve size U.S. No. 10 and above if that sieve retains more than 5 percent of the total sample. The portion of crushed surfacing retained on a U.S. No. 4 sieve shall not contain more than 0.15 percent wood waste. POROUS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 02741 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Porous Asphalt Concrete Paving April 21, 2008 Section 02741 2.4 SOIL STERILANT A. Approved products 1. Casaron pre- emergent herbicide, or approved equal. 2. Barrier 50W dichlobenil herbicide. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 SUBGRADE A. Prepare subgrade in conformance with Section 02300. Obtain approval of subgrade prior to placing crushed rock. B. Base course will be placed at depths required on subgrade to achieve finished grades indicated on plans. 3.2 SOIL STERILIZATION A. All areas to be paved shall be sterilized with a relative application of material at a minimum of twenty (20) pounds per 1,000 square feet of surface, mixed with water and applied with power spraying after grading is completed, or as recommended by the manufacturer. B. Apply material immediately prior to placement of the aggregate base. 3.3 COMPACTION-POROUS ASPHALT SECTIONS A. No work shall be performed in this section until subgrade for the section to be paved is 100% completed and accepted by the Owner's Representative. B. Finish subgrade shall be compacted to 90% maximum density in fill areas. Native subgrade will not be compacted. C. Once subgrade elevations are achieved, contractor will keep construction vehicles and other traffic off subgrade. No compaction of native material is required or desired. 3.4 CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR POROUS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING A. Placement: 1. Transport the mix to the job site in clean vehicles with smooth dump beds that have been sprayed with a non - petroleum release agent. Limit the time of haul to avoid drainage of the asphalt to the bottom of the truck bed. The mix should be covered during transportation to prevent cooling and the formation of lumps. 2. Pavement, where possible, shall be laid utilizing a self - propelled paving machine of 10' minimum width and laser plane control. 3. Vertical joints between successive days work shall be given a light track coat of emulsified asphalt SS -1, diluted with one part water to one part emulsified asphalt. POROUS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 02741 -3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Porous Asphalt Concrete Paving April 21, 2008 Section 02741 4. The top lift surface elevation, in the compacted condition, shall not deviate more than +/- 1/8" from specified elevations. Trueness measurement to be taken from 10' long straight edge placed in all directions. B. Completion: 1. Upon completion of the paving and Contractor confirmation of conformance with the tolerances, the Contractor shall notify the Technical Representative and schedule an inspection for approval. The Contractor shall have a laser plane system available to the Technical Representative for the inspections. 2. The Contractor must keep the porous asphalt free of contamination from site soil. The Contractor shall take precautions as necessary such as washing truck tires, etc. Grading will direct water away from asphalt during construction or erosion control measures will prevent sediment from reaching pavement. 3.5 ROLLERS A. Roller to be tandem drum -type, static -type of a 3 -5 ton size. Maximum loading to be 265 lbs. Weight per lineal inch of drum. B. Compaction shall be commenced when the asphalt mix temperature is at a range of 200 degrees to 240 degrees F for modified AR -4000. C. The asphalt pavement shall be rolled a minimum of two rollings. D. The surface shall receive a final rolling utilizing a one -ton roller to remove all roller marks and imperfections in the surface. 3.6 SPREADING AND FINISHING A. Compacted depth of porous asphalt pavement of any layer of any course shall not exceed .25 foot. END OF SECTION 02741 POROUS ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 02741 -4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion pansion Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf April 21, 2008 Section 02790 iSECTION 02790 — PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF PART 1 - GENERAL PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02790 B. Base Stone and Top Stone — l/ CF sample of each. C. Contractor /Operator Experience per Part 1.3.B. 1.5 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Materials shall not be mixed on site. 1.6 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. The Contractor shall satisfy himself as to the nature and quantity of materials to be moved and other work to be performed and shall notify the synthetic turf system manufacturer /installer and the Owner of any discrepancies 'between site conditions shown on the drawings and actual conditions prior to commencement of work. B. Underground Utility Lines: Known underground utility lines are shown on the Existing Site Topography Plan Sheet G0.2. The contractor shall locate and clearly mark all underground utilities and obstructions and protect or relocate all that conflict with the work described herein. Assume that other utilities may be present and use caution when excavating. Notify the Owner's Representative if any other underground utilities or structures are discovered. 1.7 PERMITS A. The Grading and Building Permit has been obtained and paid for by the Owner. Any other required permits shall be obtained by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. 1.8 COORDINATION A. No site work shall be performed without notifying the synthetic turf system installer or Owner's Representative at least 48 hours prior to commencing work. B. Coordinate work with other trades as applicable. 1.9 FINAL APPROVAL — INSPECTION AND TESTING A. A representative designated by the synthetic turf system manufacturer and the Owner's Representative will be present intermittently to observe the Contractor's operation, to perform test and measurements, and to adjust the work as necessary to meet field conditions. Such observations, tests, measurements and work adjustment shall not alter the requirements of the drawings or specifications nor imply any superintendence or control of the Contractor's operation, nor warranty the Contractor's work. PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02790 B. Relative compaction of compacted soils will be determined in general conditions with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Test Methods D 1557 (modified proctor) and D 2167, D 2922, or D 3017 PART 2- PRODUCTS 2.1 PERMEABLE BASE STONE A. Material used for Permeable Base construction shall conform to the following specifications: Gradation Sieve Size Base Stone Percent Passin Top Stone Percent Passin 2" or 50mm 100 v 11" or 38mm 90 -100 1" or 25mm 75 -100 3/4" or 19mm 65 -95 t /z" or 12.5 mm 55 -85 100 3/8" or 9.5mm 40 -75 85 -100 ' /a" or 6.3mm 25 -65 75 -100 US #4 or 4.75mm 15 -60 60 -90 US #8 or 2.36mm 0 -40 35 -75 US # 16 or 1.18mm 0 -20 10 -55 US #30 or 600µm 0 -15 0 -40 US #60 or 250 gm 0 -10 0 -15 US #100 or 150 µm 0 -8 0 -8 US #200 or 75 gm 0 -5 0 -3 B. Restrictions: 1. To ensure structural stability: • D6o/Dlo > 5 and 1 < < 3 D1oD6o • Fragmentation must be 100% 2. To ensure separation of both stones: • D85 of to stone > 2 D15 of base stone And • 3 < D50 of base stone < 6 D50 of top stone 3. To ensure proper drainage: Permeability of base stone > 600 in/hr (0.42cm/sec) • Permeability of top stone > 50 in/hr (0.035 cm/sec) • Porosity of both stones > 25% (When stone is saturated and compacted to 95% Proctor) PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 3 m Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02790 C. Depending on the type of stone present in the crushed stone mix, other mechanical characteristics might be necessary for approval. D. "Dx" is the size of the sieve (in mm) that lets x % of the stone pass. For example, D60 is the size of the sieve that lets 60 % of the stone pass. These sizes, for calculation purposes, may be obtained by interpolation on a semi -log graph of the sieve analysis. E. Should the field need to support heavy vehicles, consideration must be given for the load bearing requirements of the base. F. Infiltration rate shall be verified on -site and accepted by the Owner and the Synthetic Turf manufacturer prior to placing any material. 2.5 SAMPLING OF STONE MATERIALS A. Prior to the importation of any of the permeable base materials (base stone and top stone), the Contractor shall provide the Owner with a 1/2 cubic foot sample and a certified test lab report of the sieve analysis of the products. The materials shall be in compliance with the same sieve sizes specified and associated restrictions per Part 2.4. The turf manufacturer and the Owner shall be the final determining factor in establishing compliance with sieve requirements and restrictions. No material shall be brought onto the job site until the initial sieve analysis has been approved by the turf manufacturer and the Owner in writing. The testing laboratory shall be an independent, professional testing laboratory, approved by the Owner. B. During the course of importation of the permeable base materials, the Contractor shall be responsible for continually checking the materials to ensure that they continue to meet the Specifications. Failure to do so may require that the Contractor remove non- complying material from the site at his own cost. The Owner will have the option to take random samples for testing at their own laboratory. In the event that any sample taken and tested by the Owner reveals that non - complying material is being imported, the Contractor shall cease all importation until the Owner is assured that the Contractor is meeting the Specifications. In the event that the Owner's sieve analysis and the Contractor's sieve analysis are at variance, and either analysis reveals the material to be non - complying, the Contractor shall be responsible for obtaining the services of a third party professional testing laboratory, which, in turn shall analyze samples selected by the Owner. Third party testing fees shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. Such analysis shall be turned over to the Owner for resolution. C. The certified test lab reports required in the paragraph above, shall be submitted by the Contractor as early as possible to avoid potential delays in the Contract due to sample rejections. PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 PART 3 - EXECUTION Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02790 3.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Excavation and subgrade fine grading shall be performed in conformance with the alignment, grade and cross - sections indicated on the drawings. 3.2 SPILLAGE, DUST AND EROSION CONTROL A. The Contractor shall prevent spillage when hauling on or adjacent to any public street or highway. In the event that spillage occurs, the Contractor shall remove all spillage and sweep, wash or otherwise clean such streets in accordance with City, County and/or State requirements. B. The Contractor shall take all precautions needed to prevent a dust nuisance to adjacent public and private properties and to prevent erosion and transportation of soil downstream or offsite due to work under this contract. Any damage so caused by the Contractor's work shall be corrected or repaired by the Contractor. 3.3 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION AND GRADING A. The subgrade shall be excavated to create a positive slope towards the subsurface drain pipes. Unless otherwise specified on the drawings, the minimum slope of the subgrade shall be one (1) percent. B. Following rough grading of the subgrade, the exposed soil shall be moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture content and compacted to relative compactions (modified proctor) to produce a firm non - yielding surface as specified in Section 02300 — Earthwork. 3.4 SUBGRADE SLOPES AND FINAL GRADES A. Final subgrade grades shall conform to the lines and grades shown on the drawings. The measured grades shall not deviate more than 0.06 feet from the planned grades and not vary more than 0.04 feet in ten (10) feet in any direction. Laser grading with a laser guided road grader is required. B. All subgrade elevations shown on the drawings shall be completed by the Contractor and inspected by the Owner's Representative prior to commencing with the subsequent work items. Finish subgrade elevation shall be verified with laser plane equipment in the presence of the Owner's Representative. PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf Section 02790 3.5 DRAIN PIPE / DRAINAGE AGGREGATE A. See Section 02620 — Subdrainage. 3.6 BASE STONE A. The specified base stone shall be carefully placed as close as practical to its final in place location (within 40'of discharge point) to avoid pushing the material any distance to avoid segregation of the aggregate. Remove and replace any segregated material. Compact base stone over the subgrade and/or drainpipe to the grades and elevations shown on the drawings. If the thickness of the planned base stone exceeds six (6) inches, the stone shall be placed in horizontal layers not exceeding six (6) inches and each layer shall be "proof' rolled to 90 percent relative compaction (modified proctor) with a smooth drum roller. 'B. Finished surface shall be "proof' rolled with a smooth drum, roller to provide a non - yielding, smooth, and flat surface. C. Final base stone grades shall conform to the lines and grades shown on the drawings. The measured grades shall not deviate more than 0.04 feet from the planned grades and not vary more than 0.04 feet in ten (10) feet in any direction. Laser grading is required. D. The top surface of the base stone shall be sloped as shown on the drawings. E. All base stone grades shown on the drawings shall be completed by the Contractor and inspected by the turf manufacturer and the . Owner's Representative prior to commencing with the subsequent work items. 3.7 TOP STONE A. The specified top stone shall be carefully placed as close as practical to its final in -place location to avoid pushing the material any distance to avoid segregation of the aggregate. Remove and replace any segregated material. Compact over the base stone to the grades and elevations shown on the drawings. B. The finished surface shall be "proof' rolled with a smooth drum roller to provide a non - yielding, smooth, and flat surface. C. Final top stone grades shall conform to the lines and grades shown on the drawings. The measured grades shall not deviate more than 0.04 feet from the planned grades and not vary more than 0.02 feet in ten (10) feet in any direction. D. The top surface of the top stone shall be sloped as shown on the drawings. E. All top stone grades shown on the drawings shall be completed by the contractor and inspected by the turf manufacturer and the Owner's Representative for approval in PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 6 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Permeable Base Stone for Synthetic Turf April 21, 2008 Section 02790 writing for the purpose of warranting the artificial turf prior to commencin g with the subsequent work items. 3.8 PERIMETER HEADER / NAILER PERMEABLE BASE STONE FOR SYNTHETIC TURF 02790 - 7 ' © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Se April 21, 2008 t Plastic Lumber Section 02792 SECTION 02792 — PLASTIC LUMBER PART 1 - GENERAL PLASTIC LUMBER 02792 -1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Plastic Lumber April 21, 2008 Section 02792 2.2 HARDWARE A. Split Drive Concrete Anchors: 1. Mushroom head. 2. Hot -dip galvanized steel. 3. Size: 1/4" dia. X 3'h" long. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 SYNTHETIC TURF EDGE A. Install as shown on drawings. B. Do not oversize drilled holes for split drive anchors. 3.2 PROTECTION AND CLEAN UP A. Protection: 1. Replace any boards that are broken or chipped. B. Debris: Remove all debris. END OF SECTION 02792 PLASTIC LUMBER 02792 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 PART 1 - GENERAL Irrigation System Section 02810 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Basics: Drawings and general provisions of Contract, Special Conditions of the Contract, and other Division -1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. B. References: 1 Starfire Sports Inc. and City of Tukwila Stand 2. American Society for Testing and Materials (A 3. American Water Works Association (AWWA) 4. Foundation for Cross Connection Control and Southern California. 5. National Electrical Code (NEC). 6. Standard Specifications for Municipal Public State Chapter (latest edition). 7. State of Washington - Department of Health. ards. STM). 1.2 SUMMARY Hydraulic Research - Works Construction University of - Washington A. This Section includes the following: 1. To furnish and install all labor, equipment, materials, and permits required to construct a complete and fully operational, automatically controlled irrigation system and quick coupler valve system as indicated on the plans and specified herein. 2. The irrigation systems will be maintained by the University Place School District. 3. The irrigation systems will be supplied with reclaimed water, Q:CV system will be supplied with potable water and relocated 1 1/2" water meter. 4. Water Sources as shown on plans and per notes on plans: a. See plans for irrigation points of connection. B. Related work in other sections of these specifications includes, but is not limited to: 1. Section 334600 - Athletic Field Drainage. 2. Section 329200 — Turf and Grasses 3. Section 329300 — Plants. 4. Section 16000 — Electrical. 1.3 DEFINITIONS A. Mainline Piping: Downstream from point of connection to water distribution piping up to and including the control valves and quick couplers. Piping is under constant pressure when the system is activated. B. Lateral Line Piping: Downstream from control valves and quick couplers to sprinklers and specialties. Piping is under pressure during individual zone operation. C. The following are industry abbreviations for plastic materials: IRRIGATION 02810 -1 ()Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 1. PE: Polyethylene plastic. 2. PP: Polypropylene plastic. 3. FIN'E: Polytetrafluoroethylene plastic. 4. PVC: Polyvinyl chloride plastic. 5. '1'N'E: Tetrafluoroethylene plastic. D. The "Owner" may be the actual project owner or an owner - selected representative. 1.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. Location of Sprinklers and Specialties: Design location is approximate. Make minor adjustments as required to avoid obstructions such as plantings, site furnishings, signs and light standards. Maintain 100% coverage of landscape areas indicated. Avoid overspray onto walks as practical, unless indicated on drawings. B. The Contractor shall perform all system layout. The Landscape Architect may or may not inspect the system layout prior to installation. System components not properly located shall be reinstalled by the Contractor at no additional cost to the Owner. Make minor adjustments to assure 100% overlap coverage at no additional cost to Owner. C. Minimum Working Pressures: The following are minimum pressure requirements for piping, valves, and specialties, unless otherwise indicated: 1. Mainline Piping: 350 psi. 2. Lateral Line Piping: 350 psi. 1.5 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Material and equipment composite data sheets shall be submitted for the following: 1. PVC pipe and fittings. 2. Gate valves. 3. Double check valve. 4. Quick coupling valves (inc. key and hose swivel). 5. Control valves. 6. Control and trace wire. 7. Wire splices. 8. Swing joints. 9. Sprinkler heads / nozzles. 10. Valve boxes. 11. Controllers. 12. Master valve. 13. Manual drain valves. B. Provide four (4) copies of each data sheet to the Landscape Architect for approval. Clearly index, label, and highlight products to be utilized. C. Operation and Maintenance Manuals: The Contractor shall provide four (4) sets of the following: 1. Guarantee /warranty certificates for all equipment used. IRRIGATION 02810 -2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Irrigation System Section 02810 2. Contractors written one -year guarantee /warranty for the entire system. 3. List of authorized distributors and service centers for all products installed on the project. Include contact names, addresses, and phone numbers. 4. Instruction manuals for all equipment used. 5. Parts lists and "exploded" view drawings showing part numbers for each item. 6. Detail drawings of all areas that were unable to be shown clearly on the "as- builts". 7. Reduced and laminated zone chart. 8. Winterization and spring "start-up" procedures. 9. Provide the above information in three ring binders - clearly indexed, tabbed, and highlighted. 1.6 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Protect stored PVC piping from direct sunlight. Support pipe as necessary to prevent sagging and bending. B. Provide safe and secure storage of all material required for system installation. 1.7 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. The Contractor shall verify underground utility locations within the site. Care should be taken to avoid damage to any existing utilities and plant material. Contractor should contact Utility Locate Services at 1- 800 - 424 -5555 and/or a private locating service prior to any work, to have existing utilities located and marked on site. The Contractor is responsible for any damage that is caused. B. Interruption of Existing Water Service: Do not interrupt water service to facilities occupied by Owner or others unless permitted under the following conditions and then only after arranging to provide temporary water service according to requirements indicated: 1. Notify project architect no fewer than two (2) working days in advance of any proposed interruption of water service. Do not proceed with interruption of water service without Owner's written permission. C. Timing and scheduling: Landscape Contractor shall determine application rates and timer cycling. Adjustments, repairs, etc., other than controller programming are the responsibility of the Irrigation Contractor. D. Provide hand watering of plants required at any time during the life of the contract at Contractor's expense. 1.8 PERMITS A. All required permits should be obtained through City of Tukwila, by the Contractor at the Contractor's expense. IRRIGATION 02810 -3 0 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 1.9 COORDINATION A. Coordinate work with other trades as applicable. 1.10 EXTRA MATERIALS A. Prior to final acceptance, the Contractor shall provide to the project architect (at no additional cost to the Owner), the keys and/or other tools necessary to activate, operate, and drain the system, including: 1. Two (2) quick coupling valve keys w/ hose swivels. 2. Two (2) quick coupling valve cover keys. 3. Two (2) manual gate valve keys. 4. Two (2) manual drain valve keys. 5. Two (2) sets of all valve box cover keys. 6. Five (5) of each type of rotor head installed. 7. All extra nozzle sets for rotors (remainder of trees) not utilized during the installation. 1.11 IRRIGATION SYSTEM COMPLETION A. The Contractor shall submit the following items to the project architect prior to final acceptance: 1. Warranty Cards on all equipment so warranted. 2. "As-Built" plans as detailed in these Specifications. 3. Operations and Maintenance Manuals per paragraph 1.5.3. 4. Extra Materials per paragraph 1.10. 1.12 AS -BUILT DRAWINGS A. The Contractor shall maintain a current record of all facilities /equipment installed and record any deviations (including horizontal and vertical dimensions) on the plans (all deviations to the plans shall be pre- approved by the Landscape Architect). B. Upon completion of the system installation and prior to final acceptance, the Contractor shall provide the Landscape Architect with a NEAT, CLEAN and LEGIBLE, reproducible, set of "As- Built" drawings of the completed irrigation system. Any pipe not installed in accordance with the contract plans, shall be dimensioned to a permanent structure for location after burial. All quick coupling valves, automatic valves, manual valves, electrical splice boxes, etcetera, shall be dimensioned on the "As- Builts" to two (2) permanent monuments (preferably buildings or hardscapes). C. "As-Built" records shall be updated daily and shall be available daily for review by the project architect. D. At the controller, provide a reduced - scale, "As-Built", schematic drawing of the irrigation system. Laminate the drawing in plastic and mount inside of the controller cabinet door or on the control panel. IRRIGATION 02810 -4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 1.13 TRAINING Bid Set Irrigation System Section 02810 A. Contractor shall provide on -site, hands -on training for Owner's maintenance staff. Training shall include proper procedures for irrigation system operation, maintenance, and winterizing. Duration and content of training shall be sufficient to ensure adequate understanding of system operation and maintenance to enable the Owner to operate, maintain, and winterize the system after the departure of the Contractor. The project architect shall be notified of this session at least 72 hours in advance. Contractor shall coordinate a mutually agreeable training schedule with the Owner. 1.14 FINAL APPROVAL A. Final approval will be considered upon satisfactory completion of the following: 1. All performance tests. 2. Receipt of acceptable "As- Built" documents. 3. Extra materials. 4. Training session. 5. Receipt of signed and approved permits. 6. Substantial completion approval from the project architect. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE AND FITTINGS A. Galvanized steel pipe and fittings shall not be used within the project unless approved by the Landscape Architect. Brass fittings and piping are approved for use. 2.2 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVC PIPE FITTINGS AND CEMENT A. Polyvinyl chloride pipe shall be Schedule 40 PVC. 1. Mainline Pipe: Schedule 40. 2. Lateral Line Pipe: Schedule 40. 3. Sleeves: See paragraph 2.2. 4. 2.2.1.4 Risers on swing joints shall be Schedule 40 and 80, conforming to ASTM D 1784. See details on drawings. B. Solvent weld fittings shall be manufactured by Lasco, or Spears (or approved equal): 1. Mainline Fittings: Schedule 40/80. 2. Lateral Line Fittings: Schedule 40. 3. Valve and Quick Coupler Fittings: Schedule 40/80. C. Solvent welding compounds shall be IPS "Weld -On" products: 1. Primer: P -70 - purple. 2. Cement: P -711 - gray (heavy bodied). 2.3 PIPE AND WIRE SLEEVES A. Pipe sleeves shall be twice the size of the insert pipe traveling through it. No more than one pipe shall be installed in each sleeve. Sleeves six inches (6 ") and larger in diameter IRRIGATION 02810 -5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 shall be Class 200. Sleeves four inches (4 ") and smaller shall be Schedule 40. Install separate sleeves for control and communication wire (min. 2" diameter). B. Sleeve under all paved surfaces whether indicated on the drawings or not. C. Extend all sleeves twelve inches (12 ") past any pavement edge. D. Mark the ends of each sleeve with a 2x4 wooden stake driven 18 inches into grade with 12 inches exposed. "IR Sleeve" shall be written on the stake with black, permanent ink, and the top of each stake shall be painted fluorescent red and shall be further marked with three wraps of fluorescent pink marking tape. 2.4 GATE VALVES A. Gate valves shall be as described on drawings, or approved equal, sized per plan. Valves shall be the same size as the mainline. The valve shall have a cast iron body (with fusion- bonded coating), non -rising stem, resilient coated wedge, square operating nut, and pressure rated to 200 psi. Valve shall comply with AWWA Standard C 509. B. Provide two (2) valve- operating keys per paragraph 1.10 A. Keys shall be 36 inches long, 3/4" inch stock with "tee" handle, and painted with rust- resistant paint. 2.5 DOUBLE CHECK ASSEMBLIES A. Febco 850 Series double check assembly, line sized, or provide device meeting local code, if different than item specified, at no additional cost. 2.6 QUICK COUPLING VALVES A. Quick coupling valves shall be Rainbird 44 -LRC. Valve shall have brass construction, two -piece body design, stainless steel spring, locking thermoplastic cover, and pressure rated to 125 psi. The valve shall have a manufacturer's limited warranty of not less than five (5) years. B. Provide two (2) 44K keys and two (2) SH -1 hose swivels per paragraph 1.10 A. 2.7 AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES A. Automatic control valves for spray and rotor zones shall be Rainbird PESB -R Series with size as noted in the Valve Data Table. Valves shall be molded plastic body, 24 volt, normally closed, with purple flow control handle, manual bleed and rated at 200 psi. B. Each valve shall be tagged with a Rainbird VID Series or Christy's ID- STD -Y2 valve tag (yellow). 2.8 MASTER VALVE A. Superior 3200 RW series, with 24 Coil, normally closed, line sized. Valve handle shall be purple. IRRIGATION 02810 -6 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 2.9 SPRINKLER HEADS ' A. Sprinkler Heads: As described on drawings. 2.10 SPRINKLER AND QUICK COUPLING VALVE SWING JOINTS IRRIGATION 02810-7 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 B. Provide a 5/8 inch x 8 foot copper grounding rod for grounding controller and transient panel. Ground, following manufacturer's specifications. 2.14 MANUAL DRAIN VALVES A. Manual drain valves shall be Champion 100 -RS 1.00 ". 2.15 CONTROL WIRES AND PIPE LOCATOR WIRE A. For automatic control valves #14 single strand copper wire, Type PE, designed for 24- 50 volts. UL designation must be clearly marked on the insulation jacket of the wire. Copper conductor must meet ASTM B -3 or B -8 specifications. The white colored wire will always be the common and the yellow colored wire will always be the spare. Hot (signal) leads shall be red. Paige, Service Wire Co. 7079D, or approved equal. B. Locator wires for below -grade piping shall be #14 bare copper, ASTM B -3 or B -8 rated. 2.16 ELECTRICAL TAPE A. Electrical tape shall be black plastic, 3/4" wide, minimum 0.007 -inch thick, and all - weather type. 2.17 ELECTRICAL WIRE SPLICES A. Automatic control valve wire splices shall be 3M DBY, or DBR, no substitutions. All splices shall be within a valve box. At each splice, the wire is to be tagged with a non - fading plastic marker with the zone number permanently marked on the tag. This tag must also be included at the control valve itself. 2.18 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT A. This specification pertains only to low voltage wiring. All 120 -volt power specifications are referred to Section 16000 - Electrical. B. Conduit above finish grade shall be rigid galvanized steel with zinc - protected threads. Fittings shall be of the same material with hot dipped galvanized finish. C. Conduit within a building shall be EMT where permitted by Code. Fittings shall be suitable for this product. D. Conduit within the ground shall be Schedule 40 Rigid PVC. Fittings shall be suitable for this product. Any run over 400 feet will require a pull box in the middle of the run or every 400 feet. Pull boxes shall be ten inch (10 ") round with "ELECTRICAL" labeled on the lid. E. All equipment furnished and installed shall be in accordance with National, State, and County Electrical Codes, established safety codes and applicable local codes and ordinances. IRRIGATION 02810 -8 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 2.19 THRUST BLOCKINGS A. Thrust blocks shall be installed on the irrigation main line. Blocks shall be placed at each location main changes direction, as at ells, tees, and where the mina terminates. Main line pressure test shall not be made for a period of 48 hours following the completed pouring. Concrete thrust blocks for the supply mains shall be sized and, placed in strict accordance with the pipe manufacture's specifications, and shall be of adequate size, shape and so placed as to handle all thrust pressures and pipe movement created by the maximum internal water pressure's. Minimum size for the thrust block shall be 12" x 12" plus the amount of concrete required to fill the excavation pit fully without gaps. © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 C. Install pipe with manufacturer's markings facing up (12 o'clock). D. Trenches through existing landscape areas shall be restored to previous condition. This may require hand seeding and/or and application of 2" of bark mulch. E. Pipe shall be laid on stable soil with trench bottom evenly graded (without humps or depressions). Ledge rock, boulders and cobbles two inches (2 ") or larger shall be removed so that there is no contact with any piping. Voids remaining from the removal of large rocks shall be filled and compacted with select material. Install piping free of sags or bends. F. Where multiple irrigation pipes share a common trench, trench shall be sufficiently wide (or piping shall be arranged) to allow four inches (4 ") minimum of horizontal separation and six inches (6 ") minimum of vertical separation between piping, while maintaining specified minimum and maximum cover over piping. Irrigation pipes shall be located in a separate trench from any domestic water piping. G. Backfill around pipe and fittings shall be clean sand and shall be well tamped. The trenches shall be thoroughly compacted to 90% density at optimum moisture content. Trenches shall be backfilled in lifts to a level that is even with subgrade (or surrounding grade), raised to a slight mound and rolled with a 200 -pound roller or with an approved compactor or vibrator. Lifts shall be six inches (6 ") maximum. All roots, rocks, and surplus excavations shall be removed from the site. Contractor is responsible for all trench settlement during the warranty period of the Contract. H. Install PVC piping in dry weather when temperature is above 40 degrees Fahrenheit. Allow joints to cure at least 24 hours at temperatures above 40 degrees Fahrenheit before testing unless otherwise recommended by manufacturer. 3.5 WELDING OF PLASTIC PIPE AND FITTINGS A. Prior to construction of this project, Contractor shall provide the project architect with written evidence that all Contractor staff assigned to solvent welding duties of PVC pipe or fittings are in possession of an up -to -date certification card issued by manufacturer representative of specified solvent cement. If Contractor's staff are not in possession of current certification cards, the Contractor shall schedule and complete a training seminar (conducted by solvent cement manufacturer representative) and provide written evidence of training completion for each staff member, to the project architect prior to construction. Only staff that is certified shall be permitted to solvent weld pipe and fittings. B. All solvent weld plastic pipe shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions. Great care shall be taken to ensure that the inside of the pipe is absolutely clean. Pipe ends (not being worked) shall be protected and not left open. Cleaning of cutting burrs is mandatory. C. For solvent weld pipe, PVC pipe ends shall be cut at a 90- degree angle to the pipe length and shall be cleaned (use approved reaming tool) of all burrs prior to cementing. IRRIGATION 02810 -10 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 B. Quick Coupling Valves shall be installed in pavement at a minimum of twelve inches (12 "), and maximum of thirty -six inches (36 ") from pavement edge (except at point of connection). The maximum distance from the top of the quick coupler to the top of the valve box shall be three inches (3 "). Make sure quick coupler key easily passes the top of the valve box when fully engaged. The valve shall be installed inside a ten inch (10 ") round valve box. Care must be taken to prevent excessive water backup within the valve box. C. A six-inch (6 ") layer of washed drain rock shall be placed in the bottom of the valve box, encased in a layer of geotextile fabric. D. Thoroughly flush mainline before installing Quick Coupling Valves. 3.10 Master & AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES A. Automatic valves shall be installed per detail in specified valve boxes, one valve per valve box. Provide Schedule 80 PVC unions upstream and downstream of valve as per detail. Thoroughly flush mainline before installing automatic valves. Use valve -box extensions as necessary to extend box completely below bottom of valve. B. Install only one valve per valve box. Use Schedule 80 nipples and Schedule 40 fittings and pipe from the mainline to the valve. Use valve box extensions to insure that the box extends at least ten inches (10 ") below the bottom of the valve. The maximum distance from the flow control handle to the top of the valve box shall be six inches (6 "). Automatic valves shall be installed inside a fourteen by twenty inch (14" x 20 ") jumbo valve box. Care must be taken to prevent excessive water backup within the valve box. A six -inch (6 ") layer of drain rock shall be placed in the bottom of the valve box. Group valves where practical. Locate valve boxes six inches (6 ") from and perpendicular or parallel to walk edge, building, and walls. Provide twelve inches (12 ") between boxes where valves are grouped together. 3.11 SPRINKLER HEADS A. Install pop -up sprinklers flush with finish grade in turf areas and sports field areas (Contractor shall take steps necessary to avoid filling the sprinkler cavity with back - washed sand or soil). Sprinklers in turf areas shall be installed in a manner that permits reel type mowers to pass over (reels and rollers) sprinklers without interference. Install all pop -up sprinlder bodies perpendicular (90 deg. angle) to slope. Adjust radii of sprinklers to obtain optimum coverage. B. Backfill around heads in non - sportsfield areas shall be approved native or import topsoil, well compacted. Sprinklers shall be installed flush with sidewalks and curbs and no closer than three inches (3 ") from paved edge. All heads shall be set perpendicular to finish grade unless otherwise specified on the plans. Refer to details. C. Backfill around heads in sportsfield areas shall be the approved rootzone sand, or if the rootzone is native soil, backfill shall be approved native or import topsoil, well compacted. Provide a 12" x 12" sod piece around each sprinlder head. IRRIGATION 02810 -12 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 D. E. Bid Set Thoroughly flush lines before installing sprinkler heads. Refer to installation details. 3.12 SPRINKLER AND A. On rotor, spray, apply two wraps coupling valve). 3.13 VALVE BOXES Irrigation System Section 02810 QUICK COUPLING VALVE SWING JOINTS (RISERS) and quick coupling valve triple swing joints or flexible swing joints, of Teflon tape around threaded outlet connection (to sprinkler or quick Threaded connections shall be watertight. Do not over tighten. A. Install valve boxes plumb and flush with finish grade, so that a reel type mower may pass over without interference. Box shall be supported on continuous brick foundation per detail. Valve box archway shall not rest on piping - provide a minimum of one -inch (1") clearance around any piping. B. Provide filter fabric cover over all below grade openings to prevent debris from contaminating the drain rock. C. If construction debris washes into the automatic valve or quick coupling valve boxes prior to project completion, remove existing gravel and replace with new gravel. 3.14 CONTROLLERS A. Install per the manufacturer's specifications. B. Mounting: Controllers shall be mounted per manufacturer's recommendations. Controller panel shall be located 5 feet 6 inches from the ground level on inside wall or as shown on drawings. C. Grounding: Adequately ground controllers per manufacturer's recommendations. D. Electrical Work: Provide all equipment, labor, and materials to connect to line voltage point of connection (provided by general contractor). E. Remote adapter: Provide a Hunter permanent remote connector on controller. F. Electrical Terminal Box: Provide for a steel cabinet with a terminal strip, (2) 3" bottom inlets (1) 2" top outlet and locking cover. 14 gage at each terminal. All wires to be labeled. Each cabinet to be painted to match controllers. "A" cabinet to have 30 terminals, "B" to have 18. G. Equal to "Strong Box" model 18CP with sub assembly. H. Mounting: Cabinets to be wall mounted directly below controller. 3.15 CONTROL WIRES FOR VALVES, PIPE TRACER WIRE AND SPLICES IRRIGATION 02810 -13 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 A. Control wires shall be taped together at 10 -foot intervals and place alongside the main (not under) approx. 6" from side of pipe. Provide three (3) foot long expansion loops at all directional changes. Expansion loops shall be "zip" tied until all wire has been placed. Cut ties after all wire has been placed. B. There shall be a separate "hot" lead for each automatic valve. One common wire shall be used to reach all valves on an individual controller. Spare wires shall be installed as noted on the plans. Install spare wires to pass through each intermediate valve box. Seal ends of spare wires. Hot common and auxiliary wires shall be looped (18" minimum loop) as they pass through each valve box. C. Minimum size of copper wire for this project is #14 UF. The control wires shall be color coded as follows: 1. Neutral Wire: white. 2. Signal Wires: red. 3. Spare Wires: orange or yellow. D. Loop all wire at directional changes of mainline (3' loop). "Snake" wire in trenches during installation. E. All splices shall be encapsulated in the device specified in the paragraph for "Electrical Wire Splices ". All splices shall be contained in a plastic valve box wherein a valve is installed. No splices are permitted between controller and the valves. F. Install one (1) #14 bare copper locator (trace) wire, taped to pipe, along all mainline and laterals. Tie all bare copper wire together in one continuous web. G. Trace wire shall be visible and accessible at point of connection, all gate valves, all quick coupling valves, all ball valves, and all remote control valves. H. Manual drain valves. I. Install manual drains at low points on main line or as shown on drawings. J. Provide a Armor 181104 with locking lid for each location. K. Install a 24" gravel sump below each drain valve. 3.16 SYSTEM FLUSHING A. The entire system shall be flushed prior to the installation of the sprinkler heads. After capping all risers, Contractor shall remove the cap nearest the automatic valve, flush and recap. 1. Contractor shall then repeat this process by removing the next nearest cap. Repeat this process until the last head on the circuit is flushed. Valve zones with spray sprinklers on swing pipe risers to be flushed with pressure regulating valve adjusted to less than 75 psi. 3.17 PRESSURE TESTS IRRIGATION 02810 -14 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Irrigation System Section 02810 A. Before any testing, all piping shall be thoroughly flushed. Center loading of the pipe is permissible prior to testing, but all pipe end joints, fittings, gate valves, and automatic valve stub outs shall be exposed for inspections during the pressure test. B. Mainlines shall be filled from the point of connection until all air is removed from the mainline. Smaller sections of the mainline can be tested by closing the gate valves that isolate that particular section of piping. All new mainline pipe, fittings, gate, and automatic valves shall be subjected to a hydrostatic pressure test of 125 psi for one hour, with an allowable pressure loss of 3 psi. C. Lateral lines shall be tested at 75 psi. Test following swing joint or riser installation. All swing joints and fixed risers shall be capped. All pipe end joints, fittings, and swing joints shall be left exposed for inspection. Prior to inspection, lines shall be filled with water and all air shall be purged from the lateral. Inspection of lateral lines will be done visually. D. Rejected systems or any portions thereof shall be repaired and re- tested as specified. E. Contractor shall furnish all equipment, materials, and labor for all testing. The Contractor shall notify the project architect at least seventy -two (72) hours prior to the test so an inspector may witness the test. 3.18 LABELING AND IDENTIFYING A. Install all valve ID tags per paragraph 2.6.3. B. Provide a reduced, laminated version of the system layout and mount per the Owner's direction next to the .control panel. 3.19 PERFORMANCE TESTS A. A performance test is part of the final review. B. Prior to any seeding operations, the system shall be tested to make sure planted areas with irrigation are adequately covered. Not all seeded areas or planted areas are irrigated, refer to plans. C. Upon completion of the system installation and after the pressure tests have been completed and the system has been adjusted, the Contractor shall operate the system in the presence of the project architect. D. Coverage Check: Each automatic valve shall be operated to determine proper sprinkler coverage. Excessive water on non - landscaped areas will be checked carefully. E. The controllers shall be tested for manual and automatic operation. F. After the system performance test, the project architect may request up to five percent (5 %) of the total sprinkler nozzles be substituted at no additional cost. 3.20 FINAL REVIEW IRRIGATION 02810 -15 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Irrigation System April 21, 2008 Section 02810 A. Prior to request for final review, accomplish the following: 1. Complete the installation. 2. Balance the system by adjusting flow controls on valves. 3. Confirm proper operation of controllers. 4. Clean sediment from valve boxes so that drain rock (below valves) and 'wiring (including auxiliary wire) is clearly visible. 5. Submit Operation and Maintenance manuals for review by the project architect. 6. Complete "As Built" documents and submit for review by the project architect. 7. Submit miscellaneous keys, spare parts, and required tools and deliver them to the project architect. 3.21 CLEAN -UP A. The contractor is responsible for maintaining a clean and safe working environment throughout the project site. Regular policing of the project site of trash and project debris will be required. The disposal to all trash will be the Contractors' responsibility. END OF SECTION 02810 IRRIGATION 02810 -16 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Chainlink Fencing April 21, 2008 Section 02820 SECTION 02820 - CHAINLINK FENCING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General Terms and Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 SUMMARY A. This Section includes the following: 1. Chainlink fencing. 2. Soccer screens B. Related Sections include the following: 1. Section 02300 - Earthwork. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: Material descriptions, construction details, dimensions of individual components and profiles, and finishes for the following: 1. Fence and gateposts, rails, and fittings. 2. Chainlink fabric, reinforcements, and attachments. 3. Submit shop drawings for soccer screen and netting, installation. B. Product Certificates: Signed by manufacturers of chain -link fences and gates certifying that products furnished comply with requirements. C. Qualification Data: For firms and persons specified in "Quality Assurance" Article to demonstrate their capabilities and experience. Include lists of completed projects with project names and addresses, names and addresses of architects and owners, and other information specified. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Installer Qualifications: An experienced installer who has completed chain -link fencing similar in material, design, and extent to those indicated for this Project and whose work has resulted in construction with a record of successful in- service performance. 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Existing Utilities: Locate all buried utilities prior to beginning work. Exercise caution in the vicinity of the buried utilities. CHAINLINK FENCING 02820 -1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Chainlink Fencing April 21, 2008 Section 02820 B. Field Measurements: Verify layout information shown on Drawings in relation to property survey and existing structures. Verify dimensions by field measurements. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 CHAINLINK FABRIC (Fence and soccer screen) A. Steel Chainlink Fabric: Provide fabric fabricated in one -piece widths. Comply with Chain Link Fence Manufacturers Institute "Product Manual" and with requirements indicated below: 1. Mesh and Wire Size: 2-inch mesh and 6 gauge (0.192 inch diameter). 2. Galvanized with .30 oz. per sf on wire. 3. Knuckle selvage top and bottom. 2.2 FENCE FRAMEWORK A. Round Steel Pipe: Standard weight, Schedule 40, galvanized steel pipe complying with ASTM F 1083. Comply with ASTM F 1043, Material Design Group IA, external and internal coating Type A, consisting of not less than 1.8- oz. /sq. ft. zinc; and the following strength and stiffness requirements: 1. Posts a. All posts shall be standard hot -dip galvanized steel pipe; straight, true as to section and unspliced. b. Line posts shall be 2 3/8 inch outside diameter, Schedule 40 pipe, and 3.65 pounds per linear foot. c. Screen posts shall be 3" (2.875" OD) 5.79 lbs/ lin. Ft.., Schedule 40 pipe. d. Gate posts outside diameter (as shown), Schedule 40 pipe. e. All post finials shall be standard moisture proof, heavily galvanized, malleable iron securely fastened to posts. 2. Rails a. Fences shall have both top and bottom rails and some have mid- rails. See details for rail height. b. Rails shall be standard galvanized steel pipe 1 5/8 inch outside diameter, weight 2.27 pounds per lineal foot. c. Top rail shall be securely fastened to terminal posts and pass through tops of line post fittings, forming a continuous rail for the full length of fence. Top rail shall be furnished in random lengths from 18 to 20 feet long and with standard hot -dip galvanized steel expansion couplings not less than 6" in length. Short lengths shall not be used adjacent to terminal posts. 3. Brace Assembly a. All terminal pull posts, corner posts, and gate posts shall be furnished with double adjustable brace assembly as specified by the fence manufacturer. 4. Tension Bars & Wire Ties a. Tension bars shall be used at all terminal posts and both sides of pull posts, corner posts, and gates. Tension bars shall be of full height of fabric 3/16" x 3/4". b. Wire ties shall be 9 -gauge steel with a minimum of 0.9 oz per sf of zinc coating. c. Tension wires shall be: 6 gauge steel with a minimum of 0.9oz per sf of zinc coating. CHAINLINK FENCING 02820 -2 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Chainlink Fencing April 21, 2008 Section 02820 2.3 SOCCER SCREEN FRAMEWORK A. Posts: 1. 3' (2.875" OD) Schedule 40. B. Shop Drawings: 1. Submit shop drawing for complete screen netting installation, showing securing fasteners (size and type) netting, and seaming. 2.4 SOCCER SCREEN NETTING A. Netting: 1. By Owner B. Tie Straps: 1. Uniwrap nylon cable ties, 120 lbs. 2. Tensile Strength: TF7D. 2.5 GALVANIZING A. Shapes, plates, and fabrications ASTM A -123 and ASTM A -386; threaded fasteners ASTM A -153. B. Repair areas damaged by fabrication or handling with organic zinc rich paint (cold galvanizing compound) complying with DOD- P21035 or MIL- P26915, zinc - repair solder, or sprayed zinc. C. Minimum thickness after repair shall equal or exceed the ASTM specified thickness. 2.6 VINYL COATING A. Fabric and all materials shall be hot dipped galvanized prior to vinyl coating. B. Vinyl coating shall be thermally fused and bonded, Class 2B. C. Thickness of vinyl coating fabric shall be 6 -10 mil. All other material shall be 10 -14 mil. D. Color: "Black ". 2.7 PAINT A. All nuts, bolts, and washers shall be painted to match vinyl coating. 2.8 CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE A. General: Comply with ACI 301 for cast -in -place concrete. B. Materials: Portland cement complying with ASTM C 150 aggregates complying with ASTM C 33, and potable water. CH/UNLINK FENCING 02820 -3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Chainlink Fencing April 21, 2008 Section 02820 1. Concrete Mixes: Normal- weight concrete air entrained with not less than 3000 -psi compressive strength (28 days), 3 -inch slump, and 1 -inch maximum size aggregate. C. Materials: Dry - packaged concrete mix complying with ASTM C 387 for normal- weight concrete mixed with potable water according to manufacturer's written instructions. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 SEQUENCING A. Layout all fence lines and gates for approval by Owner's Representative prior to beginning any work. 3.2 CHAINLINK FENCE INSTALLATION A. Posts: Space line posts uniformly as shown. B. Top Rail: Install alignment. Run rail continuously on top of posts. C. Bottom and mid- Tension Wires: Install, spanning between posts, attaching at posts. D. Chainlink Fabric: Apply fabric to inside of framework. Leave the space showing on the Drawings between finish grade or surface and bottom selvage. Pull fabric taut and tie to posts, rails, and stretcher rod. Anchor to framework so fabric remains under tension after pulling force is released. E. Tension or Stretcher Rod: Thread through fabric and secure to curved ends with '/" O.D. galvanized tension rods: F. Tension Wires: Attach to fabric with 9 gauge hogrings at 2' o.c. G. Tie Wires: Use wire of proper length to firmly secure fabric to line posts and rails. Attach wire at one end to chain -link fabric, wrap wire around post a minimum of 180 degrees, and attach other end to chain - link fabric using standard round wire ties with either a preformed hook or pigtail at one end, designed to engage on picket of the chain link fabric at the preformed end, wrap around the rail and wrap around one picket of the chain link fabric at least one full turn at the other end in a manner that will draw up tightly around the rail or post. The hook or pigtail end shall also be wrapped with at least one full turn. Bend ends of wire to minimize hazard to individuals and clothing. 1. Maximum Spacing: Tie fabric to line posts, rails and structural rod 12" inches o.c. H. Fasteners: Install nuts for tension bands and carriage bolts on the side of the fence opposite the fabric side. 3.3 SOCCER SCREEN A. Netting will be provided by Owner. CHAINLINK FENCING 02820 -4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Chainlink Fencing April 21, 2008 Section 02820 3.4 CLEANUP A. Contractor shall leave grounds in good condition, remove all sand, gravel, debris, dirt, and leave fence complete and workable in all details. 3.5 GUARANTEE A. The Contractor shall guarantee in every detail the material and construction against defects. Any defects which develop within one (1) year from date of final acceptance shall be replaced at the expense of the Contractor. END OF SECTION 02820 CHAINLINK FENCING 02820 -5 0 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 SECTION 02920 — SEEDING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. This Section includes the following: 1. Lawn seeding — outside the fence. 2. Maintenance. Seeding Section 02920 B. Related Sections include the following: 1. Section 02300 — Earthwork. 2. Section 02810 — Irrigation. 3. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. "Finish Grade ": Elevation of finished surface of planting soil. B. "Topsoil ": On site native soil. C. "Subgrade ": Surface or elevation of subsoil remaining after completing excavation, or top surface of a fill or backfill immediately beneath planting soil. 1.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Installer Qualifications: A qualified landscape installer whose work has resulted in successful lawn establishment. 1. Installer's Field Supervision: Maintain an experienced full -time supervisor on Project site when planting is in progress. B. Pre - Installation Conference: Conduct a conference at Project site. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Seed Analysis: Submit a complete seed analysis. Analysis shall include percent of pure seed, germination, other crop seed, inert and weed, and the germination test data. Itemize all crop seed in excess of one percent. B. Topsoil sample (1 gallon), sieve analysis, product information. C. Fertilizer Certification: Submit duplicate copies of all invoices for all fertilizer showing the grade furnished. SEEDING 02920 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Seeding April 21, 2008 Section 02920 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 SEED A. Lawn Grass Seed: 1. Mixture: 100% by weight, Turftype, Perennial Ryegrass. 2. Ryegrass Type: Blend of two or three of the following: Dasher II, Fiesta II, Diplomat, Omega II, Manhattan II, Prelude Brightstar, Saturn, EIF, SR4200, or Tophat. 3. % Pure Seed: Ryegrass 90 %. 4. Min. % Germination: Ryegrass 90% 5. Weed Seed: Total weed seed for the mixture shall not exceed 0.5 %. B. Other Seed Requirements: 1. Seed Law: Conform to the requirements of the Washington State Seed Laws, and where applicable, the Federal Seed Act. 2. Noxious Weed Seed: All seed shall be free of seeds of weeds listed as primary noxious by the Washington State Seed Law. Seeds shall not contain seeds of weeds listed as secondary noxious by the Washington State Seed Law, singly or collectively in excess of the labeling tolerance specified by the Washington State Seed Law. 3. Rejection: When seeds furnished under this specification fail to meet the requirements within tolerance, as provided by the Washington State Seed Law, the lot shall be rejected or subjected to fiscal adjustment. 4. Recleaning: Seeds shall be thoroughly recleaned and of uniformly good quality and appearance throughout each lot. 5. Preparation for Delivery: Seeds shall be packed in clean, sound containers of uniform weight. Seed shall be labeled as required by law. 6. Reference Specifications: Chapter 15.49, Washington State Seed Law. 2.2 FERTILIZER A. For Incorporation with Seeding: 1. Grass Installation: a. 10- 10 -20- or 16 -16 -16 fertilizer with the following characteristics: 1) 50% of the nitrogen shall be derived from 38% urea formaldehyde. 2) Potash shall be derived from sulfate of potash. b. Preparation for Delivery: Fertilizer shall be packaged in new, waterproof, nonoverlaid, bags, clearly labeled as to weight, manufacturer, and content. 2. Grass Establishment: a. 15 -7 -7 fertilizer with the following characteristics: 1) Contain the following per ton: a) Nitrogen shall be totally derived from miloganite (1,020 lbs.) and 38% urea formaldehyde (1601bs.). b) Phosphoric acid shall be derived from miloganite. c) Potash shall be derived from sulfate of potashmagnesia. d) The fertilizer shall contain 4% magnesium, 3% iron, and 5% sulphur. SEEDING 02920 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Seeding Section 02920 b. Preparation for Delivery: The fertilizer shall be packaged in new, waterproof, nonoverlaid, fifty pound (50 lb.) and eighty pound (801b.) bags, clearly labeled as to weight, manufacturer, and content. 2.3 HYDROSEEDING MULCH A. 100% wood fiber mulch manufactured by the defibrating process, from fir, hemlock, or alder. 1. The mulch shall have a minimum of 60% of fibers 8.5 mm or longer and 77% of the total fiber exceeding 3.5 mm in length. 2. Wood fiber mulch shall be in uniform weight displayed clearly on each package. 3. Fiber shall be dyed green in color to provide visual metering of application. 4. Tackifier shall be incorporated into the wood fiber during the drying process. a. Percentage of tackifier shall not be les than 2% or greater than 10 %, . with the percentage used clearly labeled on outside of package. 2.4 TOPSOIL A. On site native soil. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine areas to receive lawns and grass for compliance with requirements and other conditions affecting performance. Verify finish subgrade is correct before beginning work. Proceed with installation only after unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. Beginning of landscape installation indicates acceptance of existing conditions. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Protect structures, utilities, sidewalks, pavements, and other facilities, trees, shrubs, and plantings from damage caused by seeding operations. B. Protect adjacent and adjoining areas from hydroseeding overspray. 3.3 LAWN PREPARATION A. Limit lawn subgrade preparation to planted areas. B. Newly Graded Subgrades: Loosen subgrade to a minimum depth of 4 inches. Remove stones larger than 2 inches in any dimension and sticks, roots, rubbish, and other extraneous matter and legally . dispose of them off Owner's property. SEEDING 02920 - 3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Seeding April 21, 2008 Section 02920 C. Finish Grading: Grade planting areas to a smooth, uniform surface plane with loose, uniformly fine texture. Grade to within plus or minus 1/2 inch of finish elevation. Roll and rake, remove ridges, and fill depressions to meet finish grades. Limit fine grading to areas that can be planted in the immediate future. D. Moisten prepared lawn areas before planting if soil is dry. Water thoroughly and allow surface to dry before seeding. Do not create muddy soil. E. Restore areas if eroded or otherwise disturbed after finish grading and before planting. F. Obtain approval of finish grade prior to seeding. 3.4 HYDROSEEDING A. Hydroseeding: After finished grading is complete and approved, apply seed, fertilizer and mulch in one operation by an approved hydroseeder, which utilizes water as the carrying agency and maintains a continuous agitator action that keeps seed and fiber in a homogeneously mixed slurry until pumped from tank. Distribution and discharge lines must be large enough to prevent stoppage and must be equipped with a set of hydraulic discharge spray nozzles, which provides a uniform distribution of the slurry. All spill over on equipment, pavement, trees, etc: shall be immediately cleaned off. B. Rates (per 1000 s.f.) 1. Seed: 6.9 lbs. 2. Grass Installation Fertilizer: 15 lbs. 3. Mulch:461bs. 4. Tackifier:1lb. 3.5 SECOND FERTILIZER APPLICATION A. Approximately two weeks after seeding and before the first mowing, apply the second half of the grass installation fertilizer at the rate of fifteen pounds (15 lbs.) per 1, 000 square feet. 3.6 MAINTENANCE A. All grass shall be mowed a minimum of three times before final acceptance. The first mowing shall occur when the grass first reaches two (2 ") inches in height. Mow to a height of one and one -half inches (1 -1/2"). Mowing shall continue on a weekly basis thereafter until all grass areas or the project as a whole are accepted by the Owner's Representative. SEEDING 02920 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set April 21, 2008 Seeding Section 02920 SEEDING 02920 - 5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 SECTION 02930 — PLANTING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY Bid Set Planting Section 02930 A. This Section includes: 1. Installing plant material as shown on the Drawings. 2. Installing fertilizer, mulch, and tree stakes. B. Coordinate related work and requirements specified in other parts of the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the following: 1. Section 02810 — Irrigation Systems. 2. Section 02920 — Seeding. 3. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 REFERENCES A. Refer to the following standards: 1. WSDA Washington State Department of Agriculture - Rules Relating to Standards for Nursery Stock 2. American Standard for Nursery Stock, ANSI Z60.1 -1990 3. Hortus Third, Cornell University 1.3 SYSTEM DESCRIPTION A. Materials, equipment, and labor for planting; reestablishing finish grading of planting areas following planting; protection and immediate maintenance; guarantee and replacement; and related items necessary to complete the work indicated. B. Quantities: Determine exact amounts from Drawings. 1.4 SUBMITTALS A. Within 30 days after the award of Contract, submit documentation that plant materials have been ordered, purchase order number, and sample of each plant species. B. Product Data: 1. Mulch 2. Staking Materials C. Maintenance Data. Include special directions essential for Owner's maintenance program during guarantee /warranty period. Include duplicate copies for landscaping maintenance personnel use during maintenance period. PLANTING 02930 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Planting April 21, 2008 Section 02930 D. Warrantees: 1. Plant Material Warranty: Written Warranty on Contractor's letterhead. E. Samples: 1. Mulch - 1 cubic foot. 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Supplier, installer qualifications: Contractor to have at least five years experience performing comparable work. B. Pre - Installation Meeting: 1. All plants shall be reviewed by the Owner's Representative on site prior to planting. 2. Stake all tree locations for approval prior to excavating pits. 3. Plant two (2) trees and stake in the presence of the Owner's Representative prior to planting all other shrubs and trees. 1.6 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Products Excluding Plant Materials: 1. Labeling: Furnish standard products in unopened manufacturer's standard containers bearing original labels showing quantity, analysis and name of manufacturer. 2. Storage: Store materials and products with protection from weather or other conditions which would damage or impair their effectiveness. B. Acceptance of Contractor - Procured Plant Materials: 1. Owner acceptance of Plant Materials at Delivery: Owner's Representative will review plant materials upon . delivery to verify that plants are undamaged, healthy and satisfactory for which to provide the Warranty requirements described in these Specifications. 2. Unsatisfactory Conditions: Notify Owner's Representative immediately if unsatisfactory conditions are found that will not allow the plants to be warranted as described in these Specifications. 3. Acceptance of Warranty Responsibility: By accepting delivery of plant material, without providing written notification of unsatisfactory conditions, assumes Warranty responsibilities for the plant material as described in these specifications. 4. Unloading: Removing plant material from delivery vehicle. 5. Protection Prior to Installation: Protect from sun and drying winds from delivery until planted in, final location on site. Heel -in all rootballs if not planted the same day as delivered. 6. Proper Plant Handling: Handle and protect plants, roots, rootballs, and new buds to prevent plant injuries. Pickup all plants from the rootball or container, not the trunk. 7. Unsatisfactory Materials: Immediately remove unsatisfactory materials from site. 8. Verification of Species: All plant material shall be delivered with tags or labels identifying species and variety (as applicable). Incorrect species shall be removed from the site immediately. PLANTING 02930 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 1.7 PROJECT Sl'1'E CONDITIONS Bid Set Planting Section 02930 A. Environmental Requirements: Plant during periods normal for optimum growth, as determined by season, weather conditions, and accepted practice. Contractor may conduct planting operations under unseasonable conditions, without additional compensation, by accepting full responsibility for subsequent resulting losses. B. Underground Conditions: 1. Locate utility lines and underground obstructions to avoid damage during excavation. 2. Repair and replace damaged buildings, equipment, underground utilities, irrigation equipment, paving, surfacing, stairs, and other work damaged as a result of Contractor's operations. 3. Locate and clearly mark irrigation pipe, wire, valves, and other underground equipment. 1.8 SEQUENCING AND SCHEDULING A. Coordinate ordering of materials with Owner immediately following General Contract award. Ensure that specified sizes and quantities are furnished. B. Planting Schedule: Use good horticultural practices and judgment regarding timing of planting. 1.9 WARRANTY A. Warranty Period for this work is as stated in General Conditions and begins at Owner acceptance. Warranty period for all plant material shall be one year from date of Owner acceptance. 1. Guarantee replacement: Acceptance of sample plants does not constitute acceptance of all plants. Final acceptance of plants shall occur at Owner acceptance of the completed project. a. Plant Materials: Warrant to be healthy and thriving. b. Remove and Replace Immediately During the Guarantee Period: Dead, diseased, dying, broken, or missing plant materials (except as noted below). Use specified plant and plant as specified; guarantee until acceptable, active, healthy growth is evident. c. Contractor's Responsibility: During Guarantee Period, Contractor is not responsible for replacing plants destroyed or damaged by vandalism, accidents caused by vehicle (other than Contractors), or Acts of God, provided that Contractor has exercised due care to protect the work. d. When required replacement time falls during nonplanting season, you may request Owner's permission to defer planting until proper season. If granted, immediately remove dead plants, including roots, from site. e. Backfill pits properly with topsoil. Finish grade and leave in acceptable condition until proper planting season occurs. Replace with plants of same kind and size as those originally planted. Plant as originally specified. PLANTING 02930 - 3 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Planting April 21, 2008 Section 02930 1.10 MAINTENANCE A. The maintenance shall continue until final acceptance. 1. At a minimum, maintenance shall include: watering, weed and pest control, and temporary barriers as required to insure healthy, thriving plant growth. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 MATERIAL - GENERAL A. Comply with Quality Assurance provisions, references, specifications, and manufacturer's data. 2.2 PLANT MATERIALS A. Meet or exceed following reference standards for quality, size, and condition: 1. WSDA Rules Related to Standards for Nursery Stock. 2. ANSI Z60.1 -1990: Nursery Stock. . 3. American Joint Committee of Horticultural Nomenclature: Standardized Plant Names. B. Plant abbreviations (see Drawings for complete plant list): B &B Balled and burlapped S Small BR Bare root M Medium br Branches L Large cal Caliper EXL Extra large cont Container NCN No common name dia Diameter oc On center gal Gallon tri- spaced Triangular spaced 2.3 PLANTING SOIL A. Use import topsoil where shown on the Drawings (See Section 02920 — Seeding). 2.4 FERTILIZER A. Tree Planting Fertilizer: 1. "Best Paks- 20 -10 -5 in biodegradable packet available from Simplot Turf and Horticulture, 1- 800 - 992 -6066. 2.5 TREE STAKING & GUYING MATERIALS 1. Stakes: Douglas fir with pointed end. 2. Tree Guying: PLANTING 02930 - 4 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Planting Section 02930 a. "Arbortie ": Flat woven flexible synthetic fiber 3/4" wide with a break strength of 900 lbs. Color: Olive Green. Available from Deep Root Partners, L.P., Burlingame, CA 1- 800 -458 -7668. 2.6 MULCH A. A coarse grade material derived from well- decomposed yard waste. Compost shall be produced by a permitted solid waste composting facility. All pieces shall be smaller than 2" in any direction. Submit sample. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 PRE - PLANTING INSPECTION A. General: Verify installation conditions as satisfactory to receive work of this section. Do not install until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected. Beginning work constitutes Contractor's acceptance of conditions as satisfactory. B. Contaminants: 1. Verify existing soil conditions for contaminants that may have been discarded by other trades, such as thinner and plaster. 2. Report findings in writing immediately to Owner's Representative before placing topsoil. C. Adverse Drainage Conditions: Notify Owner's Representative in writing of adverse drainage conditions affecting plant growth. 3.2 PREPARATION A. Field Measurements: 1. Verify actual plant layout in relation to Drawings: Make adjustments as required by Owner's Representative. 2. In shrub planting areas, follow specified distances on center rather than estimated number of plants, be it a larger or smaller quantity. B. Plant Locations: 1. Stake all tree locations with three -foot wood stakes for acceptance by Owner's Representative. 2. Make required field adjustments as directed by Owner's Representative. 3. Shrubs may be staked out by boundary rather than individual plants. 4. Avoid obstructions such as irrigation equipment. C. Protect the public, adjacent properties, surfaces, and surrounding areas to prevent harm during Work of this Section. PLANTING 02930 - 5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Planting April 21, 2008 Section 02930 3.3 INSTALLATION A. Install the Work in accordance with References and specifications. 3.4 FINISH GRADING A. Finish subgrade and obtain approval of Owner's Representative before beginning planting placing soil. 1. Finish subgrade shall be smooth and conform to the final finish grade after soil placement. Allow for added soil in individual plantings as specified. 3.5 PLANTING A. Preparation: 1. Before planting, soak dry rootballs. 2. Prune broken roots 1/2 inch or greater in diameter. Make clean cuts. 3. Plant when plant materials are available and weather conditions are consistent with good horticultural practice. B. Tree Pits: 1. Dig tree pits and plant according to details. Waste excess pit spoils evenly over subgrade. 2. If you encounter clay soil or unusual conditions likely to be detrimental to new plantings, notify Owner's Representative immediately. 3. Remove unsuitable material excavated from plant holes and dispose of it legally off project site. 4. Install plants with POSITIVE drainage away from rootball, unless otherwise noted. C. Fertilizer: 1. Prior to completing backfilling rootball, place Best Paks on sides evenly around rootball, 6" minimum and 8" maximum below the finish grade and approximately two inches from root tips. Owner's Representative shall be present when Best Paks are installed. 2. Place quantities as indicated and in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. a. 9 paks - 15 gal. (trees) D. Planting: 1. Hold plant in center of hole, approximately 2 inches above normal growing position and backfill with soil approximately halfway. 2. Backfill to within 5 inches of finish grade; fill hole with water and allow to settle. 3. Backfill to finish grade. 4. Raise plants settling below finish grade to correct elevation. E. Plant Tags: 1. Remove and dispose of nursery labels, tags and stakes. 2. Do not remove yellow, plastic lock -seals with serial numbers until end of Warranty period. PLANTING 02930 - 6 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set F. Soil: 1. Place soil to a uniform depth as shown on the plans. 3.6 TREE STAKING Planting Section 02930 A. Stake as shown on Drawings. 1. Tying Tree to Stakes: a. Hold trunk in one hand, pull top to one side and release. Height at which trunk will snap back to upright is Base Height. b. Attach tree ties to trunk 6 inches above Base Height. c. Install "Arbortie" per manufacturer's instructions. d. Cut off any remaining stake 2 inches above upper tree tie. 3.7 MULCHING A. Before installing mulch, obtain acceptance of the Owner's Representative of planting areas, grades, soil depths, and plant locations. B. Install mulch layer under all trees to the limits and depths as shown on the Drawings. C. Install uniform mulch layer material to the depths shown on the Drawings over cleaned and graded subsurface. D. At plant trunks and stems, taper mulch back from root ball crown so mulch does not touch bark. E. Provide 12" wide transition from top of mulch to top of walk. 3.8 FINAL INSPECTION A. Remove defective materials; in their place, install new materials, as specified. Furnish in same variety and current size of existing healthy plant materials, subject to 1 -year guarantee beginning at the date of new installation. Remove any weeds. 3.9 CLEANING A. Sweep paving clean. Leave installations properly planted, clean, and orderly. Keep premises free from scatterings and other residue of work. Leave site neat and clean at end of each working day. 1. Remove and dispose on site such items as excess earth, clippings, trimmings, leaves, litter, and debris. 2. Rake planting areas to an even, fine grade. Wash hard surfaces clean. 3. Remove flag labels from plantings. PLANTING 02930 - 7 0 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Planting April 21, 2008 Section 02930 3.10 PROTECTION OF COMPLETED WORK A. Install barriers as necessary and required to protect the work during Guarantee Period, or for shorter period as directed. 3.11 PLANT ESTABLISHMENT A. Contactor to provide water to maintain plants in non - irrigated areas. END OF SECTION 02930 PLANTING 02930 - 8 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete Section 03300 SECTION 03300 — CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 SUMMARY A. This Section includes exterior cement concrete pavement for the following: 1. Curbs, mowstrips, gutters 2. Walks 3. Walls 4. Miscellaneous Concrete Related Sections include the following: 1. Section 02300 — Earthwork. 2. Drawings and General Provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 Specification Sections, apply to this Section. 1.2 DEFINITIONS A. "Cementitious Materials ": Portland cement alone or in combination with one or more of blended hydraulic cement, expansive hydraulic cement, fly ash and other pozzolans, ground granulated blast- furnace slag, and silica fume. 1.3 SUBMITTALS A. Product Data: For each type of manufactured material and product indicated. 1. Joint Filler 2. Curing Compound B. Design Mixes: For each concrete pavement mix. Include alternate mix designs when characteristics of materials, project conditions, weather, test results, or other circumstances warrant adjustments. 1.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Installer Qualifications: An experienced installer who has completed pavement work similar in material, design, and extent to that indicated for this Project and whose work has resulted in construction with a record of successful in- service performance. B. Manufacturer Qualifications: Manufacturer of ready -mixed concrete products complying with ASTM C 94 requirements for production facilities and equipment. 1. Manufacturer must be certified according to the National Ready Mix Concrete Association's Plant Certification Program. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 1 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 C. D. Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete Section 03300 ACI Publications: Comply with ACI 301, "Specification for Structural Concrete," unless modified by the requirements of the Contract Documents. Preinstallation Conference: Conduct conference at Project site requirements in Division 1, Section 01310 - Project Management. 1. Require representatives of each entity directly concerned with concrete attend, including the following: a. Contractor's Superintendent. b. Concrete Subcontractor. to comply with 1.5 PROJECT CONDITIONS pavement to A. Traffic Control: Maintain access for vehicular and pedestrian traffic as required for other construction activities. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 FORMS A. Form Materials: Plywood, metal, metal -framed plywood, or other approved panel -type materials to provide full- depth, continuous, straight, smooth exposed surfaces. 1. Use flexible or curved forms for curves - no exceptions. B. Form - Release Agent: Commercially formulated form- release agent that will not bond with, stain, or adversely affect concrete surfaces and will not impair subsequent treatments of concrete surfaces. 2.2 STEEL REINFORCEMENT A. Reinforcement Bars: ASTM A 615/A 615M, Grade 60, deformed, #4 typical (unless noted), tie with No. 16 double annealed wire. 2.3 CONCRETE MATERIALS A. General: Use the same brand and type of cementitious material from the same manufacturer throughout the Project. B. Portland Cement: ASTM C 150, Type II. C. Aggregate: ASTM C 33, uniformly graded, from a single source, with coarse aggregate as follows: 1. Maximum Aggregate Size: 3/4 inch nominal. 2. Do not use fine or coarse aggregates containing substances that cause spalling. CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 2 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete April 21, 2008 Section 03300 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete April 21, 2008 Section 03300 C. Proportion mixes to provide concrete with the following properties: 1. Compressive Strength (28 Days): 3000 psi: Curbs, walk paving, misc. concrete 2. Slump Limit: 4 inches. D. Add air- entraining admixture at manufacturer's prescribed rate to result in concrete at point of placement having an air content as follows within a tolerance of plus or minus one and one -half percent (1.5 %): 1. Air Content: 6.0 percent for 3/4 -inch maximum aggregate. 2.8 CONCRETE MIXING A. Ready -Mixed Concrete: Comply with requirements and with ASTM C 94. B. Admixtures: 1. Add admixtures within an accuracy of three percent (3%). 2. Where two or more admixtures are used in the same batch, they shall be added separately and must be compatible. 3. Approved admixtures must be added at the appropriate time in strict compliance with manufacturer's directions. 4. Concrete that shows evidence of total collapse or segregation caused by the use of admixture shall be removed from the site. 2.9 CRUSHED ROCK BASE A. Crushed surfacin g top course per er Section 02741. 2.10 CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURBS A. Shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8 -04 of the 2006 WSDOT /APWA Standard Specifications. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 SUBGRADE PREPARATION AND CRUSHED ROCK BASE A. Verify the subgrade is correct to line and grade before beginning work. B. The subbase shall be compacted to ninety-five p y e percent (95 %) of maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM test method D -698 standard proctor before beginning concrete Work. C. Proof -roll prepared subbase surface to check for unstable areas and verify need for additional compaction. Proceed with pavement only after nonconforming conditions have been corrected and subgrade is ready to receive pavement. CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 4 to Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete Section 03300 D. Remove loose material from compacted subbase surface immediately before placing crushed rock base. E. Place crushed rock base in one lift and compact. 3.2 EDGE FORMS AND SCREED CONSTRUCTION A. Set, brace, and secure edge forms, bulkheads, and intermediate screed guides for pavement to required lines, grades, and elevations. Install forms to allow continuous progress of work and so forms can remain in place at least 24 hours after concrete placement. B. Clean forms after each use and coat with form release agent to ensure separation from concrete without damage. 3.3 STEEL REINFORCEMENT A. General: Comply with CRSI's "Manual of Standard Practice" for fabricating reinforcement and with recommendations in CRSI's "Placing Reinforcing Bars" for placing and supporting reinforcement. B. Clean reinforcement of loose rust and mill scale, earth, ice, or other bond - reducing materials. C. Arrange, space, and securely tie bars and bar supports to hold reinforcement in position during concrete placement. Maintain minimum cover to reinforcement. 3.4 JOINTS A. General: Construct construction, isolation, and contraction joints and tool edgings true to line with faces perpendicular to surface plane of concrete. Construct transverse joints at right angles to centerline, unless otherwise indicated. 1. When joining existing pavement, place transverse joints to align with previously placed joints, unless otherwise indicated. B. Construction Joints: Set construction joints at side and end terminations of pavement and at locations where pavement operations are stopped for more than one -half hour, unless pavement terminates at isolation joints. 1. Provide preformed galvanized steel or plastic keyway- section forms or bulkhead forms with keys, unless otherwise indicated. Embed keys at least 1 -1/2 inches into concrete. 2. Continue reinforcement across construction joints, unless otherwise indicated. Do not continue reinforcement through sides of pavement strips, unless otherwise indicated. 3. Provide tie bars at sides of pavement strips where indicated. 4. Use a bonding agent at locations where fresh concrete is placed against hardened or partially hardened concrete surfaces. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 5 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete Section 03300 C. Expansion Joints: 1. Locate expansion joints at intervals indicated. 2. Joints shall be at a maximum spacing of ten feet (10'); with expansion joints at beginning of curbs, curb returns, and wheelchair ramps. 3. Sawcut full width and depth of joint. D. Isolation Joints: Form isolation joints of preformed joint - filler strips abutting concrete curbs, catch basins, manholes, inlets, structures, walks, other fixed objects, and where indicated on drawings. 1. Terminate joint filler less than 1/2 inch or more than 1 inch below finished surface if joint sealant is indicated. 2. Fumish joint fillers in one -piece lengths. Where more than one length is required, lace or clip joint - filler sections together. 3. Protect top edge of joint filler during concrete placement with metal, plastic, or other temporary preformed cap. Remove protective cap after concrete has been placed on both sides of joint. E. Edging: Tool edges of joints in concrete after initial floating with an edging tool to the radius /chamfer indicated on drawings. Repeat tooling of edges after applying surface finishes. Eliminate tool marks on concrete surfaces. 3.5 CONCRETE PLACEMENT A. Inspection: Before placing concrete, inspect and complete formwork installation, reinforcement steel, and items to be embedded or cast in. Notify other trades to permit installation of their work. B. Remove snow, ice, or frost from subbase surface and reinforcement before placing concrete. Do not place concrete on frozen surfaces. C. All radii shall be formed with flexible form sections to conform to the radii shown. Rigid, straight steel sections are not allowed even in forming the large radii. D. Moisten subbase to provide a uniform dampened condition at the time concrete is placed. Do not place concrete around manholes or other structures until they are at the required finish elevation and alignment. E. Comply with requirements and with recommendations in ACI 304R for measuring, mixing, transporting, and placing concrete. F. Deposit and spread concrete in a continuous operation between transverse joints. Do not push or drag concrete into place or use vibrators to move concrete into place. G. Consolidate concrete by mechanical vibrating equipment supplemented by hand - spading, rodding, or tamping. Use equipment and procedures to consolidate concrete according to recommendations in ACI 309R. 1. Consolidate concrete along face of forms and adjacent to transverse joints with an internal vibrator. Keep vibrator away from joint assemblies, reinforcement, or side CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 6 Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion April 21, 2008 Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete Section 03300 forms. Use only square -faced shovels for hand- spreading and consolidation. Consolidate with care to prevent dislocating reinforcement, dowels, and joint devices. H. Screed pavement surfaces with a straightedge and strike off. Commence initial floating using bull floats or darbies to form an open textured and uniform surface plane before excess moisture or bleed water appears on the surface. Do not further disturb concrete surfaces before beginning finishing operations. I. Cold- Weather Placement: Comply with ACI 306.1 and as follows. Protect concrete work from physical damage or reduced strength that could be caused by frost, freezing actions, or low temperatures. 1. When air temperature has fallen to or is expected to fall below 40 degrees Fahrenheit, uniformly heat water and aggregates before mixing to obtain a concrete mixture temperature of not less than 50 degrees Fahrenheit and not more than 80 degrees Fahrenheit at point of placement. 2. Do not use frozen materials or materials containing ice or snow. 3. Do not use calcium chloride, salt, or other materials containing antifreeze agents or chemical accelerators, unless otherwise specified and approved in mix designs. J. Hot - Weather Placement: Place concrete according to recommendations in ACI 305R and as follows when hot - weather conditions exist: 1. Cool ingredients before mixing to maintain concrete temperature at time of placement below 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Chilled mixing water or chopped ice may be used to control temperature, provided water equivalent of ice is calculated to total amount of mixing water. Using liquid nitrogen to cool concrete is Contractor's option. 2. Cover reinforcement steel with water - soaked burlap so steel temperature will not exceed ambient air temperature immediately before embedding in concrete. 3. Fog -spray forms, reinforcement steel, and subgrade just before placing concrete. Keep subgrade moisture uniform without standing water, soft spots, or dry areas. 3.6 CONCRETE FINISHING A. General: Wetting of concrete surfaces during screeding, initial floating, or finishing operations is prohibited. B. Float Finish: Begin the second floating operation when bleed -water sheen has disappeared and the concrete surface has stiffened sufficiently to permit operations. Float surface with power- driven floats, or by hand floating if area is small or inaccessible to power units. Finish surfaces to true planes. Cut down high spots, and fill low spots. Refloat surface immediately to uniform granular texture. 1. Medium -to- Fine - Textured Broom Finish: Draw a soft bristle broom across float- finished concrete surface perpendicular to line of traffic to provide a uniform, fine -line texture. 2. Broom finish the top and face of curbs parallel with the curb length. CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 7 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete April 21, 2008 Section 03300 3.7 CONCRETE PROTECTION AND CURING A. General: Protect freshly placed concrete from premature drying and excessive cold or hot temperatures. Comply with ACI 306.1 for cold- weather protection and follow recommendations in ACI 305R for hot - weather protection during curing. B. Evaporation Retarder: Apply evaporation retarder to concrete surfaces if hot, dry, or windy conditions cause moisture loss approaching 0.2 lb /sq. ft. x h before and during finishing operations. Apply according to manufacturers written instructions after placing, screeding, and bull floating or darbying concrete, but before float finishing. C. Begin curing after finishing concrete, but not before free water has disappeared from concrete surface. D. Curing Methods: Cure concrete by moisture curing, moisture - retaining -cover curing, curing compound, or a combination of these as follows: 1. Moisture Curing: Keep surfaces continuously moist for not less than seven days with the following materials: a. Absorptive cover, water saturated, and kept continuously wet. Cover concrete surfaces and edges with 12 -inch lap over adjacent absorptive covers. 2. Moisture - Retaining -Cover Curing: Cover concrete surfaces with moisture - retaining cover for curing concrete, placed in widest practicable width, with sides and ends lapped at least 12 inches, and sealed by waterproof tape or adhesive. Immediately repair any holes or tears during curing period using cover material and waterproof tape. 3. Curing Compound: Apply uniformly in continuous operation by power spray or roller according to manufacturer's written instructions. Recoat areas subjected to heavy rainfall within three hours after initial application. Maintain continuity of coating and repair damage during curing period. 4. White pigmented curing compounds will not be allowed. 3.8 PAVEMENT TOLERANCES A. Comply with tolerances of ACI 117 and as follows: 1. Elevation: 1/4 inch. 2. Thickness: Plus 3/8 inch, minus 1/4 inch. 3. Surface: Gap below 10- foot - long, unleveled straightedge not to exceed 1/4 inch. 4. Lateral Alignment and Spacing of Tie Bars and Dowels: 1 inch. 5. Vertical Alignment of Tie Bars and Dowels: 1/4 inch. 6. Joint Spacing: As shown. 7. Joint Width: Plus 1/8 inch, no minus. 3.9 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Testing Agency: Owner will engage a qualified testing and inspection agency to sample materials, perform tests, and submit test reports during concrete placement. Sampling and testing for quality control may include those specified in this Article. CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 8 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 Starfire Sports Expansion Bid Set Cast -In -Place Concrete April 21, 2008 Section 03300 B. Test results shall be reported in writing to Owner's Representative, concrete manufacturer, and Contractor within 24 hours of testing. Reports of compressive - strength tests shall contain Project identification name and number, date of concrete placement, name of concrete testing agency, concrete type and class, location of concrete batch in pavement, design compressive strength at 28 days, concrete mix proportions and materials, compressive breaking strength, and type of break for both l- and 28 -day tests. C. Additional Tests: Testing agency shall make additional tests of the concrete when test results indicate slump, air entrainment, concrete strengths, or other requirements have not been met, as directed by Owner's Representative. Testing agency may conduct tests to determine adequacy of concrete by cored cylinders complying with ASTM C 42, or by other methods as directed. 3.10 REPAIRS AND PROTECTION A. Remove and replace concrete pavement that is broken, damaged, or defective, or does not meet requirements in this Section. B. Drill test cores where directed by Owner's Representative when necessary to determine magnitude of cracks or defective areas. Fill drilled core holes in satisfactory pavement areas with Portland cement concrete bonded to pavement with epoxy adhesive. C. Protect concrete from damage. Exclude traffic from pavement for at least 14 days after placement. When construction traffic is permitted, maintain pavement as clean as possible by removing surface stains and spillage of materials as they occur. D. Maintain concrete pavement free of stains, discoloration, dirt, and other foreign material. Sweep concrete pavement not more than two days before date scheduled for Substantial Completion inspections. END OF SECTION 03300 CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE 03300 - 9 © Bruce Dees & Associates 2008 • FORT DENT PARK • • TUKWILA, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER PREPARED BY Branco. 10900 NE 8TH Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98004 April 29, 2003 • • • FORT DENT PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Starfire Sports Center Traffic and Parking Analysis Table of Contents Title Page Introduction Project Description 1 Existing Street System and Programmed Improvements 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 3 Forecast Traffic Volumes 3 Trip Generation Introduction 10 Vehicle Trips 10 Net New Trips 11 Trip Distribution Non - Project Traffic 11 Project Traffic 12 Level of Service Methodology Introduction 12 HOV Facility Impacts 13 Level of Service Summary 14 Parking Analysis Existing Parking 14 Parking Demand 14 Contingency Parking 16 Summary of Findings Project Traffic 17 Project Parking 17 List of Tables Table 1— Starfire Sports Center Facilities Schedule 1 Table 2 — PM Peak Hour Volume Summary 6 Table 3 — Trip Generation for Starfire Sports Facilities 11 Table 4 — Level of Service Criteria — Signalized Intersections 13 Table 5 —Level of Service Summary 15 List of Figures Figure A — Vicinity Map 2 Figure B — Existing Channelization 4 Figure C — Proposed Channelization 5 Entranco i April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA List of Appendices A - Trip Generation Calculations B - Synchro Prinouts C - Soccer Field Trip Generation Data Entranco ii April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA • • • • INTRODUCTION • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Project Description This report documents the trip generation, trip distribution, and potential traffic impacts of the Starfire Sports Center proposed to be opened entirely within Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Fort Dent Park is located just north of Fort Dent Way, between the Green River and the Burlington Northern and Santa FE railroad tracks. The City has recently taken ownership of the park from King County. Starfire Sports is a Washington State Not - for - Profit Corporation holding a 40 -year lease with the City to construct and operate concessions in Fort Dent Park that will eventually include eight (seven lighted) soccer fields, four lighted softball diamonds, and one building with two indoor soccer fields and ancillary spaces. These facilities will be built and /or improved in phases, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 — Starfire Sports Center Facilities Schedule S I 7 .i@ k% 4f 2 ield i;4'..-4.. ;. `'r 4_I �a a `'.- ivy -p. YW eced Opening s M, 0 `�lAM2. Four Grass Fields Spring 2003 Four Synthetic Fields September 2003 Indoor Facility November 2003 Enhance Three Grass Fields Spring 2004 Existing Street System and Programmed Improvements Access into Fort Dent Park is provided via the intersection of Interurban Ave South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 westbound off- and on- ramps, and a two -lane extension of Fort Dent Way on a bridge over the Green River. Interstate 405 (1 -405) provides convenient access to this intersection for traffic from throughout the Greater Seattle Area. Traffic coming to the park from the north and south on 1 -5, and from the west on State Route (SR) 518, exits 1 -405 at the eastbound off -ramp to Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway, and proceeds north to the park entrance. Traffic from the east exits 1 -405 at the westbound off -ramp to Interurban Avenue directly opposite the park entrance. Traffic leaving the park heading for 1 -5 or SR 518 goes directly onto 1 -405 opposite the park entrance. Traffic heading east from the park turns south onto Interurban/West Valley Highway from the park entrance and proceeds to the directional loop on -ramp to eastbound 1 -405. (See Figure A.) Entranco 1 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA / S 137ith Str- -, 1...,' I >• '‘k...,. co el 1 ( 5.142ndrSr ; _ �'•�. ' *.*. 9 143rd St Tukwila kw i la \\: t PI 4th St Dutlamish r' Ri V'e r;1 -,, le , \j's5r .---A CO Lf) S 147th St S 15 4tYi 5t S 1Oth'PI"6 0) 5152nd 5t 5152nd P1 154b 0) ( 'kn. Elo, V4. Cn ,n 5 +. W A... S 151st Si 6, �'I v.,t- .0 \\ \is. NORTH y V _* /, y 'l, ›fir PCI _IS 154th S{ 53rd Av9I S� ;K„ FORT DENT PARK • y Q, rS 153rd St f I i 137 07 . S 15gth St tiesp _�k iaP} (f Southcenter Mall Ccto \\I 02003 MapGluest.com, Inc.; 02003 Navigation Technobcues All rights reserved. Use Subiect to License /Copvright Figure A Vicinity Map Evans Black I • • • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER The City of Tukwila currently has plans underway to improve Interurban Avenue South between, and including, the intersection with Fort Dent Way and the 1 -405 westbound off- and on- ramps, and the intersection with Grady Way /Southcenter Boulevard. Interurban Avenue will be widened to provide restricted lanes that give priority to high occupancy vehicles (HOV's) to access 1 -405, and provide additional capacity for general purpose (non -HOV) traffic. The existing channeliza- tion is shown in Figure B. The future channelization is shown in Figure C. Interurban Avenue South north of the park entrance, and West Valley Highway south of the 1 -405 eastbound on- and off -ramps intersection, are both currently 5 -lane sections, with two through lanes in each direction and a two -way, left -turn lane (TWLTL) in the median. The City is studying improvements for Interurban Avenue, in addition to those noted in the paragraph above, but no definite plans have been finalized. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing p.m. peak hour turning movement counts were obtained for the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on -ramps on Friday, January 10, 2003. Because of the winter season, the existing park entrance was gated closed during the traffic count. Therefore, no existing traffic demand for the park is included in the traffic counts. Recent (April 23, 2002) p.m. peak hour turning movement counts provided for the study by the City of Tukwila were considered to be the "existing" volumes at the following intersections along Interurban Avenue South/ West Valley Highway: • SE 58th Street • Grady Way South / Southcenter Boulevard • 1 -405 eastbound on- and off -ramps / South 156th Street It should be noted that Fort Dent Park was open in April 2002. Therefore, volume counts for the above intersections represent a fairly conservative estimate of existing traffic, since some park traffic is already included. Intersection turning movement volumes considered to represent existing conditions are summarized in table 2 in vehicles per hour (vph) for the p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 PM). Forecast Traffic Volumes Forecast traffic volumes for 2010 were provided by the City of Tukwila and represent approximately a 15% growth in traffic by 2010. The 2010 intersection turning movement volumes are summarized in Table 3 in vehicles per hour (vph) for the p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 PM). Entranco 3 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA Afr--- • vl 1 -405 WB Ramps NORTH It Fort Dent Way 11� Southcenter Boulevard Grady Way 1 1 rrr Figure B Existing Channelization 4 • • • • 0 0 Adrj !if c a� 1 -405 WB Ramps NORTH Fort Dent Way 1� Southcenter Boulevard Grady Way A West Valley Highway Figure C Proposed Channelization 5 Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) N VI N i n O •-- O •- a n,_ VO) m fD C) U07 O e) m n V n V •- N CD N r- v- •- '" I M n OD N > a U E w O C O) O I i O N OI O c) 't 1 I 0 0 0 0 0 (7 ,t O O O 2 O m 4 O t7 0 ,- 0 g3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 maw Q7�o cn N c6 d •]U g~ X fd 1J- U.1 O 1- N r ! .- f0 N U) co (O O.- CA d L.L G, NI- 8 u V) (D co co ON) N CO CO N co ON) N Baseball Fields Tri s 00 V d.N- N c7 V r- V N Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) CV (OD D) N n TON u7 I O y I O O nnO V V n O (D O) a0 °0 t7 r (OO In V CO C') N O i i Vim) N (D n O n 0 c7 n fD i cu E O 2 O Q F- -J Q O F- QF- -J QIJ 7 F - Q F- Q O I- QF- -J Q O F- QF- -J Q > F- QF- -J Q > F- QF- J Q > F - Q F- J Q > F- Q F- J Q > I > F-QF-1F-QF-F-QF- -J CC, = Q i ~ J Q Intersection Direction 58th Ave S / Interurban Ave S NB SB EB WB 1 -405 WB Ramps (Fort Dent Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S SB EB WB Southcenter Boulevard (SW Grady Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S (West Valley Highway) SB EB WB 6 • • • • • • cc E z N E `O L O 2 O a 2 a c .co W Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) V 0)) Cl O N V � N N a .ci it EII U d oo00om ma) 00000 cci 17 I' 2 < - 0 w U a .1.2 U 1§ F`- X N LL W C) o ) CO 17 0) LL y a it U U O 0) N CV 0)) Baseball Fields Trips a Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) cn V 0)) O N (+) C ) _ CD 0) EF- j � D CC FFOC J 2 Q F- D F- J= cc F- D F- CC HF- J= Q F- D CC F- J= CC F- Intersection Direction West Valley Hwy / NB 1 -405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) SB EB WB 7 2010 PM Peak Hour Volume Summary Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) co cq r- 1 r- CD 03 2 2 0 ID C3 2 g2 gl r- co In '' S3 ' c, to co S3 S3 23 W CL > . E 8 = .2— o ,L. a) c) c) 2 0 CD 0 'r CD C3 o Cr) c) c) e) CV „ o C) CD 81 c, 81 4 ;72 c) 23 c, c) 2 c) I 0 C3 CD C3 o CD ce tr (1) 13 c) 13 1-- x cc u- LI., c) 1- .- CD C\I If ) CD co 0 I- 0 o (1) CD CD a) — 1 a) CV CD 03 CV 11) co ID 0O CV CV Cr) CV 04 co CV Baseball Fields Trips - co ..s. T yr CV r- cr, CV Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) CV •:r ,- r- I- CV .•- - ID co CV i c0q 3 cD o . ! ! r- 0 ° c, 0 0 03 0 r.. ,r 0) '4) 141 i 0 r- 0, 0 '4) 03 irn - co v 1 , rv- - CD o .... CV c 3 1CO I C 11 a tr) o 0) 0CD Z. C1) E o M D 1-- oc I-- -J i cC I- D D I-- ac hi-- ct 1-- _1 i cC , _.1 i m I 1- D I-- _I i I- D ..1 i r I- D -i i CC I- D --i cC D -1 i cC I- D _1 i cc I- D D -1 = CC -, i CC I- I I- . I D -I i CC I- Intersection Direction 58th Ave S / Interurban Ave S NB SB EB WB 1 -405 WB Ramps (Fort Dent Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S SB EB WB Southcenter Boulevard (SW Grady Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S (West Valley Highway) SB EB WB 8 • • • • N W J Q H co E E N a) E O i O 2 Y co a 2 a O O N Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductinncl n fI0 •- cn In v`n MNON0nW N a > _` .Ci H m E ._ 0 o U a o 0 0 0 o m� o 0 0 0 0 v e2r < o .5U aH 0 x ca W 0 LL CD i v N LL N 4 NF- o 8 (./) N co N Baseball Fields Trips V Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) r- CD. `'� in a'n rn In 0 M cn n CO E o 2 J Cr cc H J i Q 1- J O CC J I Q F- Intersection Direction West Valley Hwy / NB 1 -405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) SB EB WB 9 • • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER TRIP GENERATION Introduction The Starfire Sports Center will be open year round to provide high quality soccer, softball and support facilities for teams throughout the region and nationally. The Center will eventually house one of the nation's premier soccer academies and will provide field time for individual and group instruction, practice for local teams, local league games, and local, regional and national soccer and softball tournaments. In terms of traffic demand, the worst case scenario would be during local tournaments, because for regional and national tournaments, the teams tend to arrive in fewer and larger vehicles, with more participants per vehicle. The Center's highest daily use will be on weekends, but there will be some tournaments that begin on Friday that would add vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour. In order to determine the highest number of p.m. peak hour trips that might be generated by the Starfire Sports Center, it was assumed that all of the Center's athletic fields would be in use simultaneously for local soccer and softball tournaments on a Friday. Peak project trips on the weekend will be the same as for a Friday night, but traffic volumes provided by the City indicate that background traffic in the project vicinity is lower on Saturdays, and traffic impacts should generally be Tess than during a weekday peak. Vehicle Trips The "Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6" Edition (1997) "is the industry standard for determining the number of trips generated by various types of land uses. However, the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not include data on recreational sports activities such as soccer and softball. Therefore, the approximate maximum trip generation for the overall facility during various times of the year were estimated based on facilities data provided by Starfire Sports, and trip generation rates from other published studies and the internet. Table 3 summarizes the seasonal trip generation, including the number of trips generated by the assumed worst -case scenario for traffic impacts of large, simultaneous, local 3 -day soccer and softball tournaments. The information in Table 3 includes an estimate of the number of players that would be on each field during the p.m. peak hour. The number of players is then multiplied by a factor to determine the additional number of spectators, and then by the number of fields in use to estimate the total number of people attending the Starfire Sports Center during the p.m. peak hour. After calculating the total number of people attending the Sports Center, the number of entering and exiting vehicle trips were calculated based on assumptions for average car occupancy (ACO) and participant arrivals. The factor for spectators has been modified since the Initial Traffic Impact Analysis (February 2003) from 0.50 to 0.35 for youth soccer based on trip generation data for the Twin Creeks Soccer Fields in Sunnyvale, California (OpTrans, Inc. 2000). The estimated trip generation for the Starfire facility compares favorably with the OpTrans data and to findings in a study of youth soccer facilities reported in an on -line ITE article. Table C -1 comparing the available data, and the associated information from the two studies are included in Appendix C. Entranco 10 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Also added to the trip generation were trips associated with future support facilities (exercise area, day care, food court) housed in the indoor soccer building. These trips were estimated based on Land Use Code 495 (Recreational Community Center) from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 3 lists all of the activities and trip generation included in the study. Detailed worksheets for trip generation calculations are shown in Appendix A in Tables A -1 and A -2. Table 3 — Trip Generation for Starfire Sports Facilities SF = Square Feet; vph = Vehicles per Hour Approximately 1600 -1800 bleacher seats are associated with Field No. 1. However, any event requiring even a portion of this seating would start later in the evening, or would occur on a weekend, and is not expected to influence peak period traffic operations. Net New Trips The 376 p.m. peak hour project trips indicated in Table 3 represent a worst case condition that will occur only a few times a year. For the rest of the year, traffic demand will occur mainly on weekends, and the amount of traffic generated during an average weekday peak hour is estimated to be less than 70% of the worst case scenario. In addition, Fort Dent Park was previously generating about 11 p.m. peak hour trips as a regional park (1TE Trip Generation Manual) that would no longer occur and can be deducted as a credit from the total trips that would be generated by the Starfire Sports Center. Based on the above assumptions, the net new trips for the Starfire Sports Center in a normal p.m. peak hour would be approximately 252 trips ([376x0.70] -11). TRIP DISTRIBUTION Non - Project Traffic The distribution of non - project traffic at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on -ramps is represented by the existing traffic volumes shown in Table 2, since the park was locked at the time of the count. Entranco 11 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA Soccer Fields 10 Fields 185 64 Baseball Fields 4 Fields 82 8 Support Facilities] 21 1,000 SF 13 24 `� 3p�� �k� �F yR � R•DL :��N �.7'� m � 28� €si "a, � .. .'a'3"a��F ": SF = Square Feet; vph = Vehicles per Hour Approximately 1600 -1800 bleacher seats are associated with Field No. 1. However, any event requiring even a portion of this seating would start later in the evening, or would occur on a weekend, and is not expected to influence peak period traffic operations. Net New Trips The 376 p.m. peak hour project trips indicated in Table 3 represent a worst case condition that will occur only a few times a year. For the rest of the year, traffic demand will occur mainly on weekends, and the amount of traffic generated during an average weekday peak hour is estimated to be less than 70% of the worst case scenario. In addition, Fort Dent Park was previously generating about 11 p.m. peak hour trips as a regional park (1TE Trip Generation Manual) that would no longer occur and can be deducted as a credit from the total trips that would be generated by the Starfire Sports Center. Based on the above assumptions, the net new trips for the Starfire Sports Center in a normal p.m. peak hour would be approximately 252 trips ([376x0.70] -11). TRIP DISTRIBUTION Non - Project Traffic The distribution of non - project traffic at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on -ramps is represented by the existing traffic volumes shown in Table 2, since the park was locked at the time of the count. Entranco 11 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER • Project Traffic Project traffic for the Starfire Sports Center was distributed based on an approximately uniform distribution of clientele for the Center throughout the Greater Seattle area. This distribution included 15% and 25% coming from the north and south, respectively, via 1 -5 (and 1 -405); 15% and 5% coming from the north and south, respectively, via Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway; 5% coming from the west via SR 518/1 -405; and 35% coming from the east vial-405. The estimated volumes resulting from this distribution of trips are shown in Table 2 for the following intersections along Interurban Avenue South/West Valley Highway: • • SE 58th Street • Fort Dent Way /Interstate 405 westbound off- and on -ramps • Grady Way South /Southcenter Boulevard • 1 -405 eastbound off- and on- ramps /South 156th Street The four intersections noted above are those intersections expected to have five or more project trips during the worst case scenario. As noted earlier, this condition will occur only a few times a year when large, local tournaments for soccer and softball occur simultaneously. Of the 248 net new trips during a normal p.m. peak hour, approximately 38 would travel south- bound on Interurban Avenue over the Green River Bridge (between Fort Dent Way and Grady Way), and less than 5 trips would be on West Valley Highway at Strander Boulevard. LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY Introduction The level of service in the p.m. peak hour for the four signalized intersections along Interurban Avenue South effected by five or more project trips were analyzed using a computer software program called SYNCHRO. This computer program analyzes and optimizes the operations of individual intersections. Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of the traffic operations at an intersection or along a roadway segment. Level of service is ranked from LOS A, which signifies little or no congestion (i.e. very good traffic operations), to LOS F, which signifies substantial congestion (i.e. very poor traffic operations). At signalized intersections, level of service is calculated for each movement and then is summed in a weighted fashion to yield the LOS for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. The threshold criteria given in the "Highway Capacity Manual (2000) "for level of service at signalized intersections are shown in table 4. Entranco 12 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Table 4 - Level of Service Criteria — Signalized Intersections tee. 7 Level of Service £'; t }�k 5h.$ n .xt ,-a.6 ,, i, } $$�� `* °t Average Total���D�,elayt(HCM) A < 10.0 seconds B > 10.0 and < 20.0 seconds /vehicle C > 20.0 and < 35.0 seconds /vehicle D > 35.0 and < 55.0 seconds /vehicle E > 55.0 and < 80.0 seconds /vehicle F > 80.0 seconds per vehicle HOV Facility Impacts SYNCHRO and SimTraffic cannot explicitly model High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes at signalized intersections. Therefore, an alternative methodology was created to address the traffic impacts of the existing southbound and westbound HOV facilities, and the additional northbound HOV facility proposed by the City of Tukwila, at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on- ramps. It was assumed that the HOV volumes (two or more persons per vehicle) were equal to15% of the total existing volumes. Each intersection approach with both general - purpose and HOV lanes received a special adjustment to account for the effects of the HOV lane. The proposed HOV improvement is expected to be implemented in the near future, so it was assumed for the study that the westbound HOV facility was removed and the northbound facility was open. The practical effects of these adjustments are as follows, with the first two relating to the existing southbound HOV facility, and the third to the proposed northbound HOV facility: • Southbound to westbound right turn movement on Interurban Avenue (- 11 vph) • Southbound through movement on Interurban Avenue (+ 11 vph) • Northbound to westbound left turn movement on Interurban Avenue (- 71 vph) The level of service analyses for this project assumed the first two traffic adjustments above to be part of the baseline conditions for the existing channelization, and all three to be in effect with future channelization scenarios. Entranco 13 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Level of Service Summary • Level of service analyses were conducted for the four project intersections noted above for the following 3 scenarios: • Volumes with existing channelization. • • • Volumes (without project) with the channelization revisions currently under design by the City of Tukwila. • Volumes with project and with the channelization revisions currently under design by the City of Tukwila Level of service analyses were calculated for both existing and 2010 volumes. Project trips remain unchanged between existing and 2010 as the trip generation for existing volumes assumed full build out of the project. The level of service analyses for existing and 2010 are summarized in Table 5. The current City of Tukwila standard for intersections along this segment of Interurban Avenue South is LOS E, or better. This standard is not violated by the Starfire Sports Center project under existing conditions. Only one of the study intersections under existing conditions would be at LOS E (for the third scenario), and the rest would be at LOS D or better for all scenarios. By 2010, however, two intersections in each scenario would be at LOS E, and one would be at LOS F in all scenarios, as a result of the increases in background traffic. In fact, the 2010 LOS calculated for each of the intersections is the same for every scenario (Le. with or without the project), including the one intersection at LOS A. PARKING ANALYSIS Existing Parking Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. About 50 of these would serve as daily parking for Starfire Sports Center staff and game officials, leaving about 400 spaces for participants and spectators. Parking Demand The peak parking demand for the Starfire Sports Center will occur when both a local soccer tournament and a local softball tournament take place at the same time, and all fields are in use. Table 3 previously summarized the trip generation anticipated for the center under those conditions. The peak period parking demand for this scenario is estimated to be the difference between entering and exiting traffic, or about 180 spaces. However, there are two other factors to consider. One is that the cycle time on most of the fields is between one and two hours, so the maximum parking needed could be twice the hourly need, or about 360 spaces. The second is that there will be some residual parking needed after each game to accommodate things such as team meetings, coaches' talks, and participants and fans that might stay for Entranco 14 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA 2010 PM Peak Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and Project Tri s A 0 N 0 O J 3. r d T 4H I Signal A 8.5 I Signal E 65.8 N co W c To O) c5 1 Signal F 109.8 1. Signal = signalized intersection. 2. LOS is the level of service, a concept based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 3. Delay, measured in seconds per vehicle, is the average of all the control delay experienced for all the movements of a signalized Intersection. At unsignalized intersections, the reported delay is for only one movement, the movement experiencing the Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Pro ect Tri s Control a ay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 8.3 Signal E 58.1 Signal E 58.2 n 0 co LL To c c 07 0 Existing Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Tri s Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 8.3 Signal E 56 N co W To c O1 Signal F 80.7 Existng PM Peak Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and Project Tri • s Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 7.5 Signal D 42.5 ISignal D 50.0 Signal E 74.2 Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Trips Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 ,- Q To c o, 0) Signal D 35.4 Signal D 48.5 0) N 0 To c o in Existing Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Trips >.- CO u 0 N O J O C. C Signal A 7.1 Signal C 33.9 Signal D 49.5 CD to To c co Intersection 58th Ave S / Interurban Ave S SR405 (Fort Dent Way) / Interurban Ave S Southcenter Blvd (SW Grady Way) / Interurban Ave S West Valley Hwy /1-405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) 15 • • • • • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER some or all of a following game. This latter demand has been estimated at another 90 spaces, for an approximate maximum demand of 450 spaces. This would indicate that for these occasional occurrences, staff and game officials may need to park in special areas, or other parking management techniques be applied as described below. The traffic analysis assumed games started simultaneously on all outdoor fields to evaluate a worst case condition. However, start times could be staggered in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand. It is anticipated that the highest demand for the bleacher seating around Field No. 1 on a regular basis would likely be for high school games that would attract perhaps 400 -500 fans and participants, and require 270 -330 parking spaces (assuming a 1.5 average car occupancy for attendees). Peak parking demand for bleacher seating should coincide with a decline in other parking demands, but there is a chance that residual parking may already be occupying a portion of the remaining 70 -130 spaces and some contingency parking may occasionally be needed. It is also likely that there will be infrequent events where most of the 1600 -1800 bleacher seats are used. In this case, the 400 spaces available would certainly be inadequate, and contingency parking would be required. Contingency Parking As noted above there are a few events that could require some measure of contingency parking. There are a number of flat, open areas around the park that could be configured for small amounts of temporary overflow parking, if needed for tournaments or high school games. If additional parking is needed, a number of options are available. For example, the park sits adjacent to a number of commercial properties that have a large number of paved parking spaces that could serve as shared parking on the weekend or in the evening. Southcenter Mall is also located nearby, and parking there could be combined with a shuttle system to move people to the park for large events. Although Southcenter Mall is a retail use and parking is utilized over more of the day, large events at the park can be timed to avoid peak shopping periods. In return, Starfire Sport Center could actively encourage participants to patronize local retailers. Options for contingency parking will need to be pursued by Starfire Sports Center and Starfire Sports will implement parking management procedures when necessary at the facility. These procedures may include actions that have been used at other soccer tournament venues in the Seattle area including the Rainier Showcase event at the FC Royals field in Puyallup, and the Emerald City Diadora Cup at 60 Acres Park in Redmond. These procedures may include fees for parking, off-site parking with regular shuttle service, and clear communication of parking situation and options in all participant applications and flyers, including multiple route directions to the park to encourage balanced traffic flow. Several area hotels have expressed an interest in partnering with Starfire Sports to provide housing and transportation for participants that would reduce traffic impacts and parking demand. Several hotels are also well within walking distance of the park utilizing existing and proposed trail facilities. Entranco 16 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER SUMMARY Project Traffic • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 370 gross vehicle trips in the p.m. peak hour under worst case conditions. • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 260 gross vehicle trips in the p.m. peak hour under average conditions. • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 250 net new vehicle trips under average conditions, compared to prior uses of Fort Dent Park. • Starfire Sports Center traffic alone will not cause the level of service (LOS) of any intersection on Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway to fall below the City of Tukwila standard of LOS E under existing or 2010 conditions. • One intersection (West Valley Highway at the 1 -405 NB off- and on- ramps) will be at LOS F in 2010, with or without project traffic. However, this intersection is being shown in the City's 2020 modeling as being improved by relocating the NB 1 -405 on -ramp to connect with a new extension of Tukwila Parkway between Andover Park East and West Valley Highway. This change, if it occurs, would eliminate the current high volume of NB left turns (and also SB right turns), and should improve operations substantially. Project Parking • The approximately 450 existing parking spaces at Fort Dent Park should accommodate all of the proposed day -to -day Starfire Sports Center activities. • There will be some events that could require additional parking or proactive parking management in order to accommodate demand. Events that could trigger this need include key high school matches, other stadium events, and large, local concurrent soccer and softball tournaments. • Contingency options for parking management and additional parking spaces are available, and will be secured by Starfire Sports Center, as necessary. Entranco 17 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA • • • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX A • TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS • Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hnur rn c t b rn o 10 rn o O ,'OO Oj O a co :'' ' rn O y 0 o 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals l ' 'Worst case for weekday PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 0% Bus 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound ' Car Trips at PM Peak Hour NM co m NM tD N O� LO . N , NOmN (fj gD NOM ON'aq r I r Approximate Average Car Occupancy I (AC01 CO CO .- h r (D f , G ; O R R Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour r^ N CO N` O N CND r o m p N (ND r p m l CO N N:; r p O o N N. ' a D a O m (D m 2 -a I- ° (v co t N co t7 N 10 0 N co t7 O t0 O N 319 L O (CO N : '3.000° 0 14. N 2 ` m a e, W a a 0 V N N W p a N O W O V N O 0 , N . 0 CO CD a m b C � O m .-co S a 2 'p ,010-..- � it N L N Z D a 10 I N r O O1 N O h O O) N O h �tr . . N O r O � MJ� P1 e �� a O W a O N m N mN(V O O N N m 0 N co O (O N N N m 0 0 co 0 (O N : N N co N�Ito 4► O °(:1 m g N u 0 a' a 1 TABLE 3 CENTER PM F Fields Trip Gei Nm 0 ils a p C.- N (D a 0 N N CO O O N t0 O a -'4 (O m p 0 N;: `o ID co 'Q� n j 7 Ll z N h .- N N- .- N N N. N N r.- N N r 0 CD Ca o 2 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6'30pm] 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5 m -6.30 m E gEEE1 EEEEEbE.,.. (O m m m t0:::`: Q_ Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday W eekda Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday W eekda Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct (TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) Nov - Jan (TOTAL 1 Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb-Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb-Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) Feb -Mar I 0 Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Grass Fields Adult Apr - May Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Au• Youth Assumptions: 14 Players on a Team / Game (Outdoor) 10 Players on a Team / Game (Indoor) 0.35 Spectators / Player at games Page 2 of 3 ABLE A -1 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION yip Generation Summary by Time of Year Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour .o �4 8 : Adult Assumptions: 12 Players / Game 0.25 Spectators / Player at games 50% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk /Bike 5% Bus 10% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Refrees and Starfire Staff arrive and leave outside of PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour .o §$ Average Occupancy Car (ACO) , o C' 129 / d E k) 2 o- x I— sQ. 0 q \ 2 co cv \ » o 0) 0 a) w a- )a- foo 1 < 124 _ § / 124 » K floo s / m 23Z# E -000 fkf21 Zit -Q \ st \ 3 a)oo ] / 2 / a ? kk : .... ))-- 2ir -\ -k Hours of Use 5pm- 6:00pm E \/ E i\ Weekday Weekda / / Weekday • \ Field Type Player Type Calendar_ Softball Fields Adult Sept - Jan !TOTAL Softball Fields Adult Feb - Ma / !Softball Fields Adult Jun - Aug k 0 • Co) O ch 0) z 0 r Q CC w z w O. CC I- CC 0 � Y Q w • w CO • a ~ w CC z U ' V/ r CC 0 a. cr LL cc Q 1 -10- 03011 -60 Entranco Project No. SUMMARY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY FOR ALL USES co v m o a 2- C 8 �0 to- a H U a N co" (00 N `m c c 0 CD Off 7 7 QQ C C 7 -3 -3 Fort Dent Park Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 TABLE A -2 Community Center P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreationa 0 1— • M N N CO) CO T r 1000 SF GFA Recreational Community Center Total new trips ' a C R c 3 = x l0 • R G N a L N v .0 R — a L R V N_ ' O .0 e, C C +. R a) N N (5 ea C'a v co cc a) N C N a O O 0. C C .c x a) V c 3 o c y N c Q N a) U o C. Q..3 C v E V • E i+ N • yt0 C �▪ N EOO) O o'a L L C l8 a1 e0 E • - C . y d t N E.2) O a) 5 co .5 u. N ff! +N• (1) � i N U c o td N a O .a E d E UCO l0 >` � To 13 O • 0 V (5 i ea ea 0 = c CC V L P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park H L!) Lt) 0 CV O 0) 0 O N ') 0 Regional Park Total new trips N 0 Z co . O O 2 .' Q W y X ai 0 N m a) O) Q w 1- a) .0 • • • Entranco Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX B • SYNCHRO PRINTOUTS February 4, 2003 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) ' � 7 { t 4 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak mil Ye D`i 3r. ; S e iLt'�" ..M4 EO * a , �F76?r'f b`. -f1fa iA, iA9"Ar �+%rn ' i§4' �e "?rt."k. "" -a t Lane Configurations 4 r 4, ►) f1, 41, Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 " 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '. 1900, :, 190 "" 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor' 1.00. 1.00 1.00. 1.00 0.95_" , 1.00 ; 0.95:" Frt 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 " 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 .,0.95,,`, '.1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3507 Flt Permitted ; 0.76 " `1.00 0.90 0.95 . 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1423 1583 1580 1770 3531 1641 3507 Volume (vph) 72 " ` "0 49: 1 ' 0 1 12 968 r 15.w' 6 1 575 , : ` 24 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Affil. Flow(vph) ' 78 0 53-; <' ' 1 "0 1 13 1052 16 ,,,;. 5 ,...:825`. Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 53 0 2 0 13 1068 0 5 651 0 Heavy Vehicles (° %)= '.7..1% 1 %; " 2°% " 2% 0% 0% 2% 2°!e : • 2°% 10%4 i; Turn Type Perm custom Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases ` . 4 Permitted Phases 4 4 5 Actuated Green, G (s) ` 9.2 15.5 9.2 2.3 41.3 ;14) ,. Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 15.5 9.2 2.3 41.3 1.0 40.0 Actuated gip, Ratio . 0.14 ' 0.24'• 0.14 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle EMenston (s), 3.0; , ,. 1 3.0s "" a0... , 3.0 3.0 -'( 1,.0: Lane Grp Cap (vph) 206 386 229 64 2297 26 2209 Y /SRatio Prof :,, 0.01,..°c0.30 . 000r �OEi9` v/s Ratio Perm cO.05 c0.03 0.00 v/e Ratio:, ' 0.98`, 0 k4'> .`0.01; 0.20 , ". 0.48 Uniform Delay, d1 24.6 18.8 23.2 29.7 5.6 100- , 1, ... 1.00 ", 1:00 , 1.2 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.1 25.1,-'" 29 3",.. 31.3. ..5.7i C 8 C C A 23.3. " C 10% Progresswn-Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay(s). Level of Service Approach Delay (s) , Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HCM V Iume to Capaolt ratio:. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.5 Sum of lost time (s) IntersectionCapac (iy:Utilazatiori ICU 'Level of5ervice:�_. c Critical Lane Group 0.1 A R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak ;`EBI EB �F' � 1 VIMBi fir;. w � 4�W ,...IAT IiYftfi M Lane Configurations 4 1" r rl tt+ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ' , -1900 1903 1900 1900; 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtiI. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 ' 1.00 , 1.00! 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1717 1524 1687 1639 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 Flt' Permitted 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 095 1.00` 1.00 0.95. 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1717 1524 1687 1639 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 59 8 389 '98 30 32 14 - - .906; i;1? '475,- 770 r 46 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ei4 0 6% Split 2 Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj., Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green,, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehlcle.Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) Ratio' Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio- Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay i'- Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 73 423 107 68 0 15 985 66 516 887 0 6% 6% .. 7% 7% ; ' 7% 5% ' ' 5% : '5 %`- " 4% 4% 4% custom Split Prot custom Prot 2 23 6 42 10.7 58.3 12.8 '' 12.8 2.6 40.2 ' 50.9'; '43.6 "81.2. 10.7 58.3 12.8 12.8 2.6 40.2 50.9 43.6 81.2 0.09. 0.47 0.10 i 0.10'- , 0.02. 0.33 0.41 0.66 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 149 721 175 170 36 1121 635 614 2267 0.04 ' c0 06 : ;.0.04 ' 0.01 ;, c0.23 , ' : C:0•39`',', 0,26 c0.28 0.04 0.49 -0.59- 061.;..;040 0 -42 ".. 0.88,:, 53.7 23.7 52.9 51.7 59.6 39.2 22.2 36.6 9.7 1.00 1.00 1.00: 1. ''. 1,00 '1 :09 ° 1.Ot) 1.00.-.,-.1.00,;,", ' 2.5 1.2 6.2 1.5 7.6 8.0 0.1 10.1 0.1 56.2 24.9 59.1, „532 :...` 67,'..2:',-„,' -47 -.'22,3:-....; '46.2° ` 9.8;, EC ED E D C D A 29.5 = 56.8 46.0 23.4 - ; . ` ,,? C E D C 33.9 079,, 123.3 Sum of lost time (s) 78.4% _- 'ICU Level' of Service HCM Level of Service R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak 1 o S.. ,,, Lane Configurations r ►{ Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 .' 1.00 t? r ' 1900 " 1900 1900' 1900 1600-, 1900', =;1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.971 1.00,!5 1.00 :.a; 0.88' . "1.00.. Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 . 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 ' 0.95-' 1.00- 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 Volume (vph);;`< < .- 154 729 i , 161. 305. :770.' -- 607 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj., Flow (vph) 167 792 175,' 332 837 . 660 , 193 < " 617` 5 8:_ Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 792 175 332 837 660 193 617 528 265 716 141 Heavy Vehicles'. (%) 3% 3% '; 3% 1% . 'i 1% ,' '1% - ° ` 5% 5%, 6% .'i .0 %1.; _` 6 %. Turn Type Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom Protected Phases., 7 4 5 '3 8', 5 2 Permitted Phases 4 8 1 2 3 Actuated Green ;G (s): 11.4 24.7 39.0 16:1 29 4:.. "45:4 14.3 ". 244' . , 49.5< Effective Green, g (s) 11.4 24.7 39.0 16.1 29.4 45.4 14.3 24.4 40.5 16.0 Actuated glc .Ratio 0.12 0.25 0.40 0.17 °. 030_ "0 47" .' 0.15 0.25' 042 _ 0.163 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle 1:xtensioh (e), ' 3.0 -. . 3.0 3:0: ' 3 0 . < 3 0 3.13 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 205 891 629 296 1081 747 253 837 641 280 720 v ! s 0.10. 0.23 0 . 0 4 . 1 9 ; ' 0 . 2 3 ' 0.07 c0.41 0.34 v /cAatw 0.81 0.89 - 0.28 ' 1 a2 ' ,077 19.6 40.6 30.9 23.5 1:00 1.00" .100 ' 1:00: 0.2 89.2 3.5 12.0 12.8 3.4 8.4 39.1 32.0 rr r 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.95 -,0.95 1.00:` 0.P6,. 1.00 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 0.65 " 0.95 .1:0W i 0.959` 1` 00 ' 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 178 _ 508: 411¢" z 244 659 ` 1130, 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 41.9 34.9 Progre; oi5, actor.'. 1,00 .1.00_ Incremental Delay, d2 21.4 10.7 63.2 ' 45 ' Level of Service E D Approach Detay`(s) - 44.3 Approach LOS D HCM Average Control Delay HCM )lofU nO1:6 Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersecfion,Capa* Utilization c Critical Lane Group 0r" 588 25.2 40.2 35.5 1 11045...:;1. ., " 0993- "1297 344, 35.5!':, BF CD D HCM Level of Service 97.2 Sum of lost time (s) 96.3% ICU Level of Service ,_ 8.0 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak ()� �' -► �p��), ��}f �y *_+�. ��ypk * �q �yt {�f * ;t,,� \ • 1 4/ Moveme .. '+' L� r, to ±tT'svttat�4`,*"FTV,i'_,"Y ow Y"�:ogiir`,'>tIw@ i� l 001, dso€ar rT s a�, s, ,;. 'f T r 4 jv T? r ?T r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 '!1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 , 1.00 1.00`. 0.95 ' 1.00 ?. 1.00 1719 1810 1538 1842 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 0.75 1.00 '1.00 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00. 1.00:_ 0.95 1.00-•' ! 1.00 1348 1810 1538 1711 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 310 9 ; 377 '' 11 � 6 14 491. 972 11 47 - 1005 ` 260 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 337 10 410', 12, 7° 15 534', 1057' 12 51 " 1092-'' ` 283 337 10 410 0 19 15 534 1057 12 51 1092 283 5% 5% 5% 0% 0%. 0% 2% s 2% 2%'. ° " 4% + 4 %• f 4 % , Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom 3 4 7 5 2 1 ;. 6` 3 35 71 2 B3 45.5 45.5 91.6. z 45.5 56.8 42.1- 78.0 78.0 ! 7.3 -43.2 = ..92.7 . 45.5 45.5 91.6 45.5 56.8 42.1 78.0 78.0 7.3 43.2 92.7 0.32 = 0.32 ° -0.64 ' 0.32- 0.40` .0.29; 0.55. 0.56 0.05 ' 0.30 :: 0.65 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane UtiL Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph). Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C'Ratio Clearance Time (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vie Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor. Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) ' Level of Service Approach' Delay (s) < < Approach LOS 430 577 987 0.01` c0.25 0.27 0.78 4.02 '0:42' 44.2 33.3 12.5 1.00: 1.12 1.3 oo 9.0 0.0 3 53.2` . 33.3 "; 12.8 D C B 3111,; C 545 642 522 1933 00.30 0,30 0.01 0.01 0.03 ' 0.02; ` 1.02,: :0.55. 33.5 26.1 50.4 21.0 1.00 ; 1.00 ..13)0 ° 1.00, 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.3 135." 26.2 " `957 21.a C F C 46.0 D HCM Average Control Delay 52.9 HCM Level of Service HCM Vrume' 0-. Capacity ratio ; 0.95.; ; Actuated Cycle Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utitization.. 95.1%' "' (ICU f Level of ;Service", c Critical Lane Group 865 89 1050 1008 003. c.31 `:: `: 0.01 0.18 0.01,: 0.57. = 1.04-. _1 14.8 66.2 49.8 10.7 1.00'= • 1.00. 0.0 8.6 38.7 0.2 14.8'x; 74.9 "`. 88.5' ''10.9' BE F B 72.6 E R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor FrI Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak -i C t 4\ t /' r ;EB Et . z WBt zcill ' „i elf 'iN e- £_ ofwv $ ' 8t 4 r a► ►f 41. ''t ?H 1900 1900 1900 �' 1900 1900: 1900 1900 1900 1900"- 1900" ".1900. 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 i 1.00 1.00 0.95 .. , ` 1 :00, ;' 0,95 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95" '„ 1.00 . 0.95` '1.00 ' 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3507 0.76 1.00 0.90' 0 :95 1.00. Q.95;:" 00' 1423 1583 1581 1770 3531 1641 3507 Volume (vph) , - ' 83 0 56,• 1 0 . -. 1, ... 24 1112 " .17,',, 6 '. ' 661 .,',28 ; Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Row (vph) ' " 90 0 - 61 , 11' :' - 0' `', ', :1: 26. 1209 .,:18' ' '.7', '° 7111',, 30 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 61 0 2 0 26 1227 0 7 748 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) - 1% ' 1% .. 2% 2.A..., 0% 0% 2% 2%, 2% •10% `' 2% . ":10 %`- Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases 4 4 5 Actuated Green; G (s) 9.6'. 19.7 ' 9.6 . 61 "'41;0 1 0 35.9 Effective Green, g (s) 9.6 19.7 9.6 6.1 41.0 1.0 35.9 Actuated g/C;IRatio 0.15 ': 0.31 0.15. 0.10, " 0 -84 002 : 0.56 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 30 3.Q 3.0° 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 490 239 170 2276 26 1980 via Ratio Prot - 0.01 c0.35 c0 `. v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.04 0.00 vlc tatio - . ;: . 0.42 0.12 - ; 0.01',,-.' i` O 5- 0.54' Uniform Delay, dl 24.5 15.8 23.0 26.4 6.2 Progression. Factor ' 1.00 • 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 Delay (s) 25.8 15.9 . ' _. Level of Service C 8 Approach Detay (s) . 21.8 Approach LOS C Perm custom Perm Prot Prot 5 '2 1�!' 6, 0.0 0.4 0.2 230 26.8 6 "ax `.... C C A 23.0 C A HCM Average Control Delay 8.3 HCM,,Volurne to Capacity ratio . 0.52 w.; s Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.6 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization,' 52.3%" ICU Leval of Service , . c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak igt S EB Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpf) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) 68 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 74 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 6% Turn Type Split Protected Phases 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) ;> > 1900 S°. t iik. .wO*TAB. O4 t E0..'= 5 ? FR;'I 141C° iNv AlMttt3 , 4 i"" 'i F> 'i Tf if 'i f'. 1900 1900 ` 1900 1900 1900 " -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 `?1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.96 . 1.00 0.95 1.00. 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 ,1.00 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 0.96 1.00 Q95' 1.00. 0.95 1.00 1.00 ,, 095: 1.00 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 9 " "447 113 i 40 " • ,37 16 1041 70? " 600 885 •, "` 53 , 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 10 486::..123 43 . 40. 17 1132 ' 76 652; 962""" : 58 84 486 123 83 0 17 1132 76 652 1020 0 6 %. "; 6 % °` 7% ' 7% " 7% 5% 5% 5%! 4% . - 4% ! =4160 custom Split Prot custom Prot 2 6 6' 7 4. _ ..3 8' 2 23 6 42 12.0 60.7 "'14.2 14.2 2.6 39.2..' 51.2: ; _44.7 81.3 , 12.0 60.7 14.2 14.2 2.6 39.2 51.2 44.7 81.3 0.10 0.48 0.11 0:11 • ~ ° 0.02 - 0.31 0.41 0.35Y 0.64 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 43:(0) 4.0 3.0 .f 3,0 ` !' 3.0 ,, 3.0 3 0. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 163 734 190 185 35 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 w ` : c0.07 ,'; 0.05 - 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm c0.32 v/c Ratio + 0.52;. 0.66 - 0.66 ' 0.45 0.49 Uniform Delay, dl 543 24.9 53.6 52.3 61.1 Progression Factor" ' 1.iltk ° 4.00. 1.00 ; „'1.00 - `_ . 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 2.3 7.4 1.7 10.2 Decay - 57.0'. 27.1 '. 50,D, , % 54.0. '' 71.3 Level of Service E C E D E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C E HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio,. Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization .. c Critical Lane Group 56.0 HCM Level of Service 094 a, 126.1 Sum of lost time (s) 10.9% % ' =` .ICU Level of Service 1069 624 615 2219 c0.33a, c0.38'? 030' 0.05 1.06 >0.12: .1.06." 046 43.4 23.4 40.7 11.3 1.00 1.00', ` 100 ; 1,00 44.5 0.1 53.3 0.2 88.{ ' 23.5. 94.0 , . 11.5" F C F B F D 12.0 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak IAovementsiii,v` <. EBL:4iEBT_a..EBR:: WBLµ "W9TT•' iNBR ""NBL2"`• °;NBL TIBR, SEL;t:SER`'$ER2:+�°'r /1/1 r rr r 1900 1900 1900`:;' 1900 1900: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • 0.97 t.00.. 1.00 ' 0.88 1.00 ' 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.95 • 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1.00 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 0.95 _ 1.00` 0.95„ ',1.00 1.00 ;. 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 711; 558 • 280 .; 757: 250. •' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 773 607; 304.;: 823. „ 272' 773 607 304 823 272 5% • '•5% 6% 6% 6% .•: >. • Lane Configurations ►) T? j ) ?T )+ rf ;Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900' 1900 ' 1900 1900 • 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtiI Factor ' 1.00, 0.95 1.00; • 1.00 0,95 1.00 ' .1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95, ." 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 ' 1.00 0.95 • Said. Flow (pro0 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 Flt f ermrtEed 0.95 1 :00 ' 1,00 0.95 1 00 1.00 0.95 Said. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 Volume (vph):. • .177 •, ` 838 2 •.185_ 350. 885 698. 24 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 'Ad1; Flow (vph)" 192 . . 911 .. a '201 380. •'962 ` ; 759, ` .`26 Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 911 201 380 962 759 26 HeavyVehiaes ( %) . Turn Type Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom Protected Pt>aes 7 ": 4 5.. 3 8.. \ 5 2 1 6 :.. - Permitted Phases 4 8 1 2 3 6 7 Actuated Green, Gr(s) . , 171 33.0 42.3 Effective Green, g (s) 17.1 33.0 42.3 Aotuated_g/C, Ratio... 0.13.. :: 0.25 , , • 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,Vehicte :Extension'(s) `' . 3.0 '3.0 , .• 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 230 890 510 • u/s Ratio Prot 0 :11' c0 :26, 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 v% Ratty "t - 0.83 '.':1.02 ' 039, Uniform Delay, di 55.1 48.5 33.9 Progression Factor .: . :1 .Oo •, 1.00 -1.00 Incremental Delay, .d2 22.2 36.3 0.5 ,Delay (s) 77 :2 84,8 34 4 Level of Service E F C A troy ::ciejI f (s)` :' ' ' Approach LOS E g""°ersec" '""one urrttnary '.. HCM Average Control Delay HCAA Volume t9yCapacity ratio • Actuated Cycle Length (s). Intersection Capacity, Utilization• c Cntical Lane Group 27 :0.' 42.9 659 79.3 `31.0, '58.0, ••23.0 44.7, 611..8. ... 27.0 42.9 65.9 9.3 31.0 58.0 23.0 44.7 61.8 0 21 •' 033 0.51 0.07 ` 0 24: 0.45.. 0.18 034 0.48: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0' 3.0.. 371 1179 811 123 795 686 301 922 724 c0.21 647' • 0.02 c0.23 c018. 6.31 c0.47 0.39 0.18 .1.02 0.82 ` .094 0.21 0.97 0.88 1.01 0 89' 038 ' `• 51.5 39.9 30.1 56.9 49.1 32.9 53.5 40.4 21.8 • 1.00,:. 1.00 ' ; 100 '1.00 • ••• 1.00 1.00 100 - 100. ' .1.00 ,' 53.1 4.5 17.8 0.9 25.1 13.0 54.4 10.9 0.3 104 B ,, 44 4 47,9 57:6 -.:,74:g7' 46 0 107.9 F D b- E E D F_ D C 56.E 5'_ 6E 57E 9', •- ... 62.1 HCM Level of Service 098 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) • 110'4 %'.: "',;ICU Level`of Service R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak J ._ ~- t t P ._�r.-.- iiii._. -Tf - n7.........r;.. _._ ...,E ...f........_.-r._ r_ ._ _t Frt .ggil...781§-.v1a13- rm.,•.�•7. 1 Movements : <,; ,•'",•'lEBL :��EBT" EBR'::cWBL-. ":WB �" WBR"". �; NBL::"' NBT.. NBR•:r�;SBL••;'.SBT-,?rSBR,-:�- - 7.": Lane Configurations ' + r 4 r ' ++ r 1 11 r • Ideal Flow4phpl) 7 " 1900 1900 1900 `."1900. :' 1900 . 1900 " 1900 1900 1900, . 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • Lane Uti( Factor -1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 100 ,1.00 - "0.95 1.00 - 1.00,,. 0.95 ;1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Fit .095 :1.00 1.00 0:97. 1.00:. 0.95, 1.00 1.00 0.95` 1.00 1.00 • Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1810 1538 1841 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Ftt Permitted 0.74 ....1. 00 :*1100' 0.89 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 ` 1.00 0.95. 100 1.00 . Satd. Flow (perm) 1344 1810 1538 1698 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Volume (vph) ,'. • 356,.- :Alp' `433` 13 7...-. :16. : 564• r 1117. : 13 . .54 1155 ;299 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 . 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph)'. _ • 387 • . - :11 : 471 14 .8, :'!.:17 ` 613 1214. 14 " S. 59 ' : 1255. ,. 325 Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 11 471 0 22 17 613 1214 14 59 1255 325 Heavy Vehicles (%c)'. 5% .. 5% 5% . 0% :0% • 0% . 2% 2%:. `2% 4% : '4% 4% Tum Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom Protected Phases: :... 3 4` :: 7 Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 2 Actuated_Green; G (s) 12.3. 475., 475• 90.6•_ , „47.5 .59.0 :'.s..1.: 75 :8 75.8 • Effective Green, g (s) 47.5 47.5 90.6 47.5 59.0 39.1 75.8 75.8 Actuated g/C Ratio' _ _, 0,33: •: 0;33 0:63 0.33 ; 0:41 0.27. 0 :53' :0.53 0.05 ": 0, - 31 :; 0.67. _ 4 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) ` 3 :0 3.0 3:0 " 3.0 3.0 7 3:0 3.0 3.0' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 447 602 976 565 667 485 1879 840 91 1074 1041 v /sf3atioProt 001. f..c035'. 0 :. 003- _c036:. _. v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 v/c Rat o 0.87 0.02: 0.48 0:04 003 _ 126 0 :65 ` 0.02 065• ." 11)7:: .. 0 31 ''- Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 32.0 13.8 32.2 24.9 51.9 23.9 15.9 66.4 49.3 9.8 • Progression Factor ,,'1 :00.. 1:00. 1:00 1100' : 1.00 .." 1 00 -.1:00 :; 1.00 100 100, 100 Incremental Delay, d2 15.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 134.5 0.8 0.0 14.8 86.1 0.2 Delays) ;` ; ? _.._ 60.6, "320 , 14;1 322 "249._ ;186.3 24.7 15;9'_ 8 '. 1 21354 __.100 -j-",.7.11'..-_, Level of Service E C B C C • F C B F F A APProach,Delay (s). 35.1' 29:0 ` : " 78;4 '1666 ;. _._. Approach LOS D C E F • 63. 7.5 , 442 7.5 44.2 95.7 • )ntersectioKStl nmarys�i.'� ilti:li'34,4 1 d .7iiMe: S ' x.g. fM47,n • l'' °{'�� . � r+'.. r ,,. �`T� .,;'L3,1 HCM Average Control Delay 80.7 HCM Level of Service F HCM Viilume C_apacity ratio, : .. » 1.09... - Actuated Cycle Length Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity" Utiliiatio'n':.. ` ; '106.8% : ICU, Level of Service . . c Critical Lane Group R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro\Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 4 Entranbel5 -FF51 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak 1'vtovemeni • Lane Configurations ideal Flow (yphpl) : .` ,:.1900' Total Lost time (s) Lane Util.yFactorL Frt . Fit Protectd Satd. Flow "(prat) FltPermthed �` Satd. Flow (perm) t `► 1 -/ EBt ._EBT„�' EB 1q BL W BTaW..BR, . . NBL NBT NBR SBL §BTc SBR >M i : ( 4 r 4 ' +t, ' 4t. 1900 -'1900:1900 1900 1900 :,;1900.7.19007 •19001 1900 .1900: 1900 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 095., _ .. 1 :00 095' • 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 -- '1. 00 .,..r, s.. .s_...._.�_.�_ 0.95 _-..._- •_- e...,.- .:r.,..*.r.�'....... ,._.._._/ 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3507 1423 1583 1580 0.95 ` 100 i 095 1 o 1770 3531 1641 3507 0 0 1 ) : • _ , , . . : . 0: 49 1 0 1 ,12 %'968 15x 5.c;5750 24 '.. '" T..... Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 r ,. , _ - r - a . rte- : 1 Ady_flow (vph).��ti;. ,.....I. 78 _ 0 .: � 53 "_ 1 _ 0 ^ 1 i_37C�1052 .1�° ....5�_.. 625�,:_26 . �:_ � . _,s..:.......x._._.. ! Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 53 0 2 0 13 1068 0 5 651 Hea Vehicles % 1% . ..-11-90':. 2% : 2% : ' 0% :. t 0% ' . 2 ' ...` 2%. ' 2%7 .10% ' 2 %' ,..10% r . `" . ., "7:.`;4'. vy� ( ) - Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot ''i,G _.,4`, . _ .a: ,k av p. 8 -. ...y .T6,......°.2:_1._ R.' :,1r7t:a 4 4 . :i•-•".::9:2_ 92..`:s' :.,.:a9_ ?�:..:,. ``10_ 42t;,� 10 42. 9.2 9.2 9.2 1.0 42.1 1.0 42.1 Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green G (s)` Effective Green, g (s) Actuated giC Ratio '.:y 0 14 0.14 ^ w 0.14 0.02 "7:0 65 mow; ---"0 :02: 0 65 Clearance Time (s) _.. ..._._ _.._ __. �.._... Vehi leExten ion (S), -. {..,_.... r,,•'' 3 :0, :-, 3.0; . ,.., _. 30 . - .. l3.0';z�r '3.0'. :w«�3:0:..,t . 0•3 -+--7 ... ,. . �' . . . 7x s :: ".`:3! Lane Grp Cap (vph) _ 204 226 226 28 2312 -gym 26 2296 _ _ i -: : ?'- 1 :ice`: .:. �_ c001w jc030.�__._`,_�1�000 T(T- '19 .1•Y >:-_ `...,_.a`.� s._r.........:1...".'. ._::0 c0.05 0.03 0.00 038 -_; 02:J. ;4,..:_001 :t 046;tty�48 ._. 019 40287._.:..�..- _.v..._..-, . .'1. >-K��....;:7..','°t" 25.0 24.4 23.6 31.4 5.5 31.3 4.7 v/s Ratio Perm Uniform Delay, d1 Progressio°n'Factor ;t Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 Delay;.($)!." "•.:�.,.�....,. _..... Level of Service Approach LOS it tesection{ ummary. .�' -- '- 0.5 0.0 11.7 0.1 3.6 0.1 7' 48 3 i D, A, C HCM Average Control.Delay 7.1 HCM Level of Service HCM.Volume,t tCapacity.ratio: -.. z ' : ::'.. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 64.3 Sum of lost time (s) 1270 .�, L j line_ rsection Capaaty Utilization _. ,,473%; _,,. ICU. Level of Service : : :� • c Critical Lane Group �.T • ... la .r �.WI:L� i •.... ... J__;O� �1.. 4 -.,v., :.'t R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2:1-405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak -4 c 4- MolreFerit-i4F-..,..)-17-7,547EBIlit..1 EBTWEBR1XWBAPtiff3TAWBRWSEIMNS-EVIWSEWIslifitIlvP.K1W,TWNWAWAWSMTIWANCIfigingti Lane Configurations 4 r ) t, ' Ideal;Flow (vphpl) ::..-.. 19610 1900; 16661.1006 ' 7 1900 1966::906:.; 1900 ,100.01, 1900 .ippix i...:::: . • 7 ' ,. .. •• :,, • :'..'..". _. •:_--;:: "' -.. - 7:: , Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 416 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • Lane Util. Factor ; r • . -'': • -1.00 ' 1.00 rob, .1.00 ' - . 1 too . . 095 1.06 -; 1..00' - 0:95'-':.'- ' .*. : ": : , . ' - .:;.".i Frt 1100 -V.85 • 1.00 - 0:63. 1.00 1.00 0.85 6.00 ' ' ' •• ' ' • • . . -' . ' .. - Fit Protected : .7 •::rf ‘:',..... -17. :6.96 . -.7 f :00::: .......... :06::.::::.....:::::0 95L1:90,,.• '1 .907 095 1 ...299*;.,,:'_ .: : ."7:'. ::7_.-.772.±7 .:1,........7:•..zi,:"--.. 7.7 ,"::_.1.7:. Satd. Flow (lira) 1717 1524 1687 -1640 1710 3438 1538 1736 3442 Fit Perrnitied : . ..' 1 -7.:-..,-...7$3.-99.-:"...1.96. l:0..9 ' 7 1 .130" .• .:1,095.7;1:00... 1.99 " :1". 095 •'- foo .•.._ '.-. :. ..:; _ ..i.• . " ', ..-',7--;_ig,:..--77-7,;-.fliT.7 Satd. Flow (perm) 1717 1524 1687 1648 - • ---- 1719 1538 - 1736 3442 Voltime..(vph) ... -: ,.., .,.... 69,..,.. .8- ,..389..-:::.. ,..98.;,.:.: 35*.;; . 32 ....1: ..14'....r.:' 906" :.,'.61: '.' 404 770. .: 46 ., ...: ' ' '.,'... • .2,.....:?..... ..'..;;.*:..,:7:i •::::::;,! Peak-hour factor, PHF 6.92 0.62 0.92 0.92 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.62 0.92 0.92 0.92 Aai.:Fi*(y15(i):::•: :.t.-:‘:.:.1.-.:: 64....; .:.: 1 9 '...•:423: ;161..•-:%:40::.: 7: 5-1-77..1_.57;E:'..9j357'.'...: :§6_1-'.--43.„9 1 .7" 83t.: '1::'69...:;::.:,.1`ifT':-..--.:.: 1' 7 .:i 2-7.:*.17.7:13.7'.:7:771 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 73 423 107 73 - 0 -15 - 985 66 * 439 887 - Healiy Veniaiel(c4 7 . ': 6% :. 66/-0-: .*:. 6 - - -65-X;* .-:'-711.;., 77 7-6h----- -7%".... ..9' --,7:6'%',7'. 5% - 4%': ';`' -4%-.--.7-4-%........-"7- :.;':.' :- ;',-;;".•-s...:*.:-...-c.77.- :7, i Turn Type Split custom Split Prot custom Prot Pi01600 PriakeS7j 2 : , 2 - _...: 7.',7'. :.:',..§.. . ;. .6 ,:_._ . : r ':. :4: t"...:',':;'":',....i. : 372... ;.':::8; -::: 7". '..:,..:-. 77:- 7. 1-7. *. Y.':'-•.'.':"..'.7,:::77-7].:721 Permitted Phases 2 23 6 4 2 .Aatuated G!0),..-P. (s).-_:::::, :*::., I 0.5-.:: -42.9.;:2:-'. ;12,6: `::126::.:'...:...*.,*:-..11-7...--...2-8...;:::.525 .3 ,.;', 60: 28.4' '.' •.:■7811::.::..; -..:. :.? :, '1,.. "e.''..`," .1:;-:-..",,...':•'.2;. ',.:2.,-, :::'''. 7 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 42.9 12.6 12.6 2.8 52.5 63.0 28.4 78.1 Aiiedg/CRiio 009 036 01010 02044 O52024 065 - - _i J Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 WertialeEideriii(a) .: - 7,-77.7 3:97.°7::2 7,7:37977.• 73:97,T T'77.•;• ''-'7773:9':.,7773:67' 7::. :7.7? 7310-',73.9:7:7-77 7.':: 7"• T. - .7.; '-. 7: '',7-.7.77277"7777•777•Yr7:77 Lane Grp Cap(vph) ...... 150 545 177 173. 40 1504 807 411 2240 ViSilaticiPi:ot :L. ... • • . 604'..-..f.,.,;',..;.:;., eaot.„,, 6.64; - -'7•.-,, p.of - b0.26::,!:. '--., .--.17(;0.25, 010.7•-.1. :„‘-1.:17.:1--1,,,_' .:.'z, :::':..::''.',.::':•::.1,..z....---,;:t.::77.1 v/s Ratio Perm co.28 .. --- - 0.04 • - ' - ' 1.. 60 ..7:iffik,T,.- 6.-067::::ti..WTc .7,-5:;To.31077:7:605:---: 608 7107,,7•.:',•00717:: Uniform Delay, di 52.2 34.3 51.3 50.3 57.7 26.6 14.1 45.8 9.9 -1?:,i,'661197SiciiFac161-!"2 7,7. 77,77:7..:7f.6077_-_-1...79977":9971:71597_,:•7: ,,;_7:i'•X 100 100 ,..19:507ii:,oiif•;,::,,,:.;:::: incremental Delay, d2 • - - - 2.5 6.8 . 5.7 1.7 - 5.8 - 2.2- 0.0 55.2 • 0.3 0-i141i(s)';:::::,7:'.::: :.17J::....:.... ...5.41*,1'411:1h570 L .:'5?-2..2: ' 7:7!:',..4.67' ':gP8 '.;11441-': 0,9 -::::::,7,4:-.[i.'1::. Level of Service D D E D E C B F A h-Tproach,Delar(s):-.._7...,:i. : :7 4:317: : :,77.;:«77.-.741 Tr.:::.7 .-5567.5'771::::r -.7 ' ,7:7:,,,-284.7,- ,_-, 7 7 - !•::-. ::'.::..7 !...7: . 4.41,: j:::).:,..s.;;.:j.i..,:;.::.7.::-.-,...„..._.i.:_.;_.. 7..3,3 Approach LOS D d C HMation Summa a.-„ksaFtrarra a a .7 4.•:.; . 31. '17, • ".• • ". •.1 HCM Average Control Delay 35.4 HCM Level of Service 27-0:767..'.:3::Y=31:::;;I:i:7...r lS.'S;;I:7,--f... ' . ..• - . :::. ' , --:•°l . ' . '7-77.7- .:-.-.F..17,72:-'27„,,f' Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 7 c. c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 2 Entranbel5-FF51 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak EBLg; EBT EBATAwBL, . w- inzwBB NBLcorz�oc isft . SEL :-sERw"+. sERZ Z...•-z �Aovement�`,d, ., ,4..n Configurations_ Ideal Flow.(vphpl)'' Total Lost time (s) Lane UUf Factor', Frt Fit Protected. Satd. Flow (prot) FttPe_rinitted'' Satd. Flow (perm) • • 1900 1900 .1900 1900.''x.1900 1900. '1190-9;f: 1900, :1 1900 1900..1900 .. " -:l 900. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 1.00 0:95'. ;1.00' .1.00.,':.0 95 1 ' 0 0 71.067,,:b: 97{. _:1 _ 0 0 , - 1 . 0 0 : 0 . 8 8 1 . 0 0 : 1 :00 1.00 0.85 .1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.95' -100 100 0 95 ' 1.00 100. 0 95 0 1-700-." 0 95 : 100 , 1:00 1752 • 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 0.95 :1007 i 00 0:95 ?'' 100 1`.692,1: 0;95 0.95 100 0 9b '-t 100 1.00 :' 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 26820. 1524 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj= Ftow (vph) . Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy,Vehictes ( %) . Turn Type P-rottected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio ,N Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s): • Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Perm • Uniform Delay, dt Progression Factor w Incremental Delay, d2 belay Level of Service Approach'Delay (s)_„,", Approach LOS nterke-a oT - :154' 729;,_.161 • 305 _ 770 0.92 0.92 0.92 '6.12 0.92 167 - `792_ 175 ' 332 837 • 167 792 175 332 837 3 %, 3%:. - 7.1% 1... 607 = A1794,.....: :;568 t 486'¢ 244a :_.659 130;.' 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 66019 3 __617' _... _..,. _- .. 660 193 617 528 265 716 _ 141 1%7:777-60/0• = . 5% 5% ' '5%; , .. 6% ,•v' 6% .: ` .. Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom _.:7. 4 5 '.3.. _._8.. �._5 2'Y .T .,'1._t... 6 r--- 81 23 67 -'23 :6:';'350 - '4'570 i155x_298 ` 534< 220 36:3; "- 535" 17.2 28.6 44.1 23.6 35.0 57.0 15.5 29.8 53.4 22.0 36.3 53.5 :1-47 024_± 0 37 020:`_;``_029` 0.48:1- 01$?` :-.6 25'1. 0:4:471.i 018" ..:,030 ' 45 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 7,.,3.0;:. 3.0.: ', 30. ;_%` "30, _.3.0_: ::-.3:0' it, 1-,3 :0' "::310'.f7.--,'- 251 835 576 351 1042 760 222 _828_ 684 312 811 679 010,7c023";7,004 rc019_}',t023 „ ^ O.T1a 4N0 9` 'Y'' °�:` 016 •c027 .''w s '.y 0.07 c0.41 0.34 0.09 626-i,---;:::, 0:95 030' -''t :0.951 j0`80. 087 0,.87r ,075 0.77, +:x085 4 :U.Ba: o :21 48.7 45.0 27.0 47.6 39.3 28.1 51.3 41.6 28.2 47.4 39.8 20.3 .. 100100,"1 00 i : - . . 0 1AOg 1IS --, 1 -- 1T00u - 092 • 071 071 10.3 28.3 6.0 5.4 16.1 11.4 0.1 ,38.5ic ?..79 :5,`_ :.'47,6 :33.- . 598 . 39.5 14.4 -' E D C E ............ B .._ 46= 7:11' 4172'77:- �j* * p 0 D 6.5 19.5 0.3 33.9 55 2' .64 5 27.3 81.5 :: E - E E D umma; HCM Average Control Delay 48.5 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume (o Capacity r0tto . '...(.16r., ? ,' • •Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120 0 Sum of lost time (s) V Intersection Capacity Utilization- 0:3% ICU Level of Sennce, _ c Critical Lane Group • ry R: \03011- 60 \Trattic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy/I-405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy./Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak f -+ C 4- k" 4\ t /* \* 1 MOVem-e-ntgaT::77-'.7EBITAMBV...777EBRU,VERMTV.BR...r.-WBAErCfialiTABriliT•NBRIMBIf7 • SEITR78EIR77,:-77-7 Lane Configurations ) f r 4 r -) ft, r vi r+ r Ideal Flow (vph01) . ::1900 . 1900 1 1900 1900 1600 . 1600'. .1600% :21906: isoo:- 1900 -:•1900 :. isbo::; '• • . .•!: .', ,.. ., . . Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 _ ._ Lane Util. Factor .:. ' .. :1.00: 1'.00 - 1.00 t: ::: \* .._....-..f :00.,:, 1.00 ..._ 1.00: 0.95',. ,11.00 • 1.00 ,.7. 095 ..• 1.00':,..:'.::,..• - ..L..: ... • . ,... Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 643 1.66 1.00 0.85 .........._ . Flt Protected : ' ' .".• 6.95:- -. 1.00 -..1.00''., .'; ...., ; - 0177' - t.00,.... 0.95 -7 .1.06'. .1.00 . 0.95 1.00': 1.00.-. . ..-. '-': ., , .=- .7 •••, '....;... _ • . 7:7:-.i Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 1810 1538 1842 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 _.. .._ ... . Fit Fiermitied .. •,•.: ' • .:; • '. 0.75; .: 1.00: : 1.00: . • L's;.,T... ',.090... ,...1.00...,.." 095:; „,i.od ...1.00 .,_;.0.95 1.00...1 .00y , •:.: .'.,....; ,.... ,.:_ l''-,:. • .,.. ,.,:.1.,..,..:....':;,.•:.:':7; Satd. Flow (perm) 1348 1810 1538 1711 1615 770 3539. 1583 1736 3471 1553 .101Urrie (yph) • . .'-: r ., 310; • . 9 ....' 377. .... 11 ',..-.. ,,, 6 ! ' 14 .;', 491 .'..'.. 972 .. .11".• : '.,1,47 . 1005 4 : 260, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 WI T pii-iiiiiptiy .:•: y '... 37 .T6 7:' : 4:fp 771r.77.777:;:717101067 ..:[..7T2 : ',-.-817'1622•:, , .293 ..._, _ ......._. Lane Group Flow (vph) 337 10 410 0 19 15 534 1057 12 51 1092 . 283 .-- Hea■iy Vehide&(Y.) 5W. ' '5% ., '''5%.*.: 7. 0%-: .. 0% . ''0% - ,. 2%. 2% .•: 2%,.. 4% .. •'4% i'' 4% ..;•,:' '.; , . ' . !:: Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom Protected amase7k, '7,', _ ...'• , ...- ,.,'..,''::,.., '::-.7.,-,.;74-.:''..;.,.:1-j...,',,....... '...:;:.-:•: .2,7.,..§.-s.': .":112::." ..' '`'7.1:.1, '..:.7;',.6 :i.:..k .1.'.4.::„.,:„::,. •.: '.."....7:, ' :: C ',,,-.1:, :.'-: :`.7.:. 7:1 Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 2 5-3 AC ItratidGreen, G(s): ',- • 45.5; 45.5'916.7-7,:77..45:.55427.-'.76.--.780 :' 7.:711':;43927" ::;,:,.....-'7' Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 45.5 91.6 45.5 56.8 . 42.1 78.0 78.0 7.3 43.2 92.7 AZKltecf.g/C Ratio .:: ..17:::: 9.3; !::'6..:32 1.:,.. 064.,-:::, 7 : '7 b327r, c:1,7467 ic.72,9.-,..„..0.55!''',:0.55:21105::• .7 030 "965.......... :::.:. : . .' ,..s.,,,y... • ''. „!,. :,,..„:,';',, : Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:6 4.0 4.0 VehiCie Eicterision Oj : '; T.'73:0'."2j.0 "''' .. 7 7 4' • :"... 3.0 "" '''.'.:,"77 ":' 3:a..7-.- aT,..-..,':. 303.0 -,.,.. .047•-•-7-3": Lane Grp Cap (vph) • 430 577 987 545 642 522 1933 865 89 1050 1008 Ws Fiatio Fiat • :: - J - . - 0701-- , • .' ... ,- -..:. - ', '-, -7. -; ., . :7.: c0.30-.•-• 0.30- • -1-*a0T•i:Sc0 31=7, .:F''7': . ' ' • • ....-s ''"::'' ''. '. 7:'::::'.17::':':17-1",V7-7 I v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 WCRalf:6: r": ":77':::'-..±:a7-67.0.6-77-042:z,y.._Ly_._'.a03..,-;'-.0.02.;,-.. 1'.02;,..f... .55OCT .il ,.,a ' 57-..,..:. .04-, , ,..,_ .,.2...,-.1._,...., uniform DeleY, d1 . 442 3376- 1.6 -6b.8. ie.f 564 21.0 14.8' 66.2 49.8 10.7 -,..- _1....._..... Progression Factor t ' .: -.. lip.., 100_, ,.:1-.991 .'7,1.00 ,.6.i..00r. 1.00,,, , '100" ,1.66.:';-100,..,.1,.06„.:-., =,.,, ' ,...: .... . ...,-,....,;,,,...:,;,;7‘. . . ,. _. . Incremenfal Delay, d2 90 00 0.3 _ 0.0 0.0 45.3 03 0.0 86 38.7 0.2 P14i(4::."7::::.:......''' ...... :03 :, 33 :8,:' :: 1213. ,.•.::::.,7.L.;.,.,335".:20:11: 957 '_:::212:',..'.548 ::.,,:74..9 - 88=5...,' 109 Level of Service D C B C C F C B E F-- B 1.46:1R411(i()..- '1 ....Yr T--51..TT:T,''-72-7 ti -7-7710:•::'"7-7e7:v.•-77c-77 77:- Approach LOS C C D E irti-erse-E-ST umrrmuy HCM Average Control Delay 52.9 HCM Level of Service PMV.019-f Cycle Length (s) 142.8 bliii eiP-.a.0.4.-it-ifitio:V.f:...7.7.-1?.--:: ::::6:1:9--..7.7..:.::„, ...:,:77.."... .., :::=:,:.!'.-75.177:7, : : . : -:, ::: 3 :,..,: :,::: 77.::.: ....;:.2:?••!, .1-41--17'5.:1..„3-.7...,:, :7:33 cf-. ,', ':774 _ • _..., __ ,_, Actuatecium of lost time (s) 12.0 . yoirsiotoil-p-4606.ity,thitii?tiali.-:7.,: 7 .:-... _66.."..1%1‘:::2-:::::::AcLki.:eVel6fS#1...■46fr:•: ,: , ;:l Tr E.;;:::: ".- ':' .--...•:•'.' `T.f...." i''-.•:;. :.•' • . .; ''-'7:77:::',...7..„.•:.,'L! c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 4 Entranbe15-FF51 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak C 4- 4\ . P rarein-eiftVg;,74,HAWS:'.Ett117*,,,,FEW,7170:311174W-8133W78.1-ZiWtiP4F14-811s.-7P■IBWKIBAriiii'8131-VWS13:1WISSBR1Z.W7r5W1,'' Lane Configurations Fit-MT-Ciolu-ri.267t.-6';:capa7itfratio 7 ', 0..52,,LL.;:.:j...,* • ,. L.•,,i...t. ;IL: ::••:::::, 77 :'; ,..'-'2,f;:.2.., 7.:. : s•-•( X-7'.', .1-77,;;K:,77177.;:..:7 77-7, 7.-.--'7 7:7 '.:--7.7.7f:71,71,7:71.1 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.6 Sum Of lost time (s) 12.0 1;;;;-77527" :::•„;T:..":10..:t1 Siiviii-17 7 7.'7' c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2:1-405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak _) ~ 1" y 4" \ s Movement WEBL • : EB; E R NBL W.- BMV78R ' SEL -SEIWSER' NWf_ fiW,Migfia Lane Configurations 4 r if to ►) ft r ) ?1a Ideal Flow (vphpl) • . : ' 1900•. ;1900 1900 ,. ,1900, „,1 900 : ;1900., 1900:..1900 _1900. 1900. 1900' 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Uta.,Factor, 1 00 . 1.00 • 1.00 ";1.00 - 1.00 0.95 :: 1.00 1 "00 '0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 ..9.961'.,:- 100. " : 095`,::!100 0.95 .1.00. 9.95:,.7,-.1.90 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 .0.96 .. 1.00 996'. too 0.95 .1.00 :".'1'.00'-..'.0.95''1.0O ...:.too::-.: 4'. 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 Frt Flt Protected.: • Said. Flow (prot) FitPerrnifted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) ' Peak -hour factor, PHF 0 Ai1j Row (vph): ' Lane Group Flow (vphj Heavy Vehicles ( %)- • Turn Type Protected. Phases Permitted Phases Actuate J Green, G.(0 Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C.Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension Lane Grp Cap (vph) ,/s Ratio Prot _ ; s _ v/s Ratio Perm v/a Ratio Uniform Delay, dl Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s)..'. _ .. Level of Service Approacti.Delay.(s) Approach LOS Intemacl(ort Sum ■ 447 113. 40 ' :37. 16 ;'1041 .. 70 . 600,"~ 885': .92 0.92 0.92 0.92 -0.92 - 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 74. _ „.,10 4867.:::` 123 ', 43 : • 40 ".17 :1132 ' 76 -. -652 • �" 962 0 64 486 123 63 0 17 1132 76 652 1020 Split custom Split Prot custom Prot 3 _ 2 23 12.6 " ''b80>, 15.3 '.:_-15.3 12.6 58.0 15.3 15.3 = 0.09y "0.41 0.117 _011;, 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.OT 17' 155 631 184 180 • 7.-65:57,77-6:67,;: r. 60.32 • o a" 077 60.9 35.3 59.9 58.5 7 100 1 -.00 -1 00: 3.8 5.8 8.9 1.9 E D E E 65'4. D �E 42 2.8 .'.' .54.7.:" .. 67.3 - : ' :41:4'" 2-93.3 2.8 54.7 67.3 41.4 93.3 0.39 ., _0;48 7-20-.30710:67- T _ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0 34 1343 739 513 _2294 0.05 67.9 38.7 19.9 49.3 11.1 :. 1 `00 ; - 1.00 11.1 6.6 0.1 127.9 0.2 -79.0 45.3 :. E. D 199 B. 1.. 72:4' . F 44:2 ...._ .' D HCM Average Control Delay 58.1 HCM Level of Service E _ --7'. , r HCM.Volume to Capacity ratio__..:.. =_- L.:,9:94',.;',.: '._ . .::_.� _,. •:.:; - , , . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) intersection 'Capacity_Utilaation;_, , ..90 9%-'. � ICU LeVet of Service•- c Critical Lane Group E • R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak -+ 4- *-* 4\ \-• Movement 7-4'2,141:::f:::<;:f-t, EETGREBTArtE6RW31114wEIRPORtliti06721C41311W0413-01MEIRWERITV-SEFt2 71 ++ r ) tt • r ii 'I) r 1 Fir r Lane Configurations IdeifFiOW (vplipl) • .' . ;1900 :;•1900, '.' 1900 ''' 1900- • 1900 1900- 1900 '•' -1900 ' 190071900 , 1900 : -1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 420 4.0 4.0. 4.0 4.0 Life:Uti[Factor ‘: ..:! .:. 1.0a. ',...05'.,...:24..60-.1..007;70.667:1.40::. 1:60 ' 0...91: 7 1 .cip. ::..,,1'.00...,088 :::v 1.00.: .:i .;,' ::-.....::._ __:-..'." Frt 1 00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 00 0 85 1 00 1-00 0 85 1 00 0.85 685 . Flt"Prote-eted,. ::„,,:, :" ...: , 0.95? ,:100::711:00 : 0,95' 1.051:1:60-:-.. 09T. , ci§-• '-:- 1 :Oa; :0:95':"'7`.• ):00,:=-. 1.00 : ....': ' ': ..i' ' '", ,77:::7:": . - ' .. T 713 Satd. Flow (prot) 175.2 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Fit Penhitted:,'! : .. . :': %:',.0.66:::. 1.06. :-1.00: 71156 71 1.067: 71.00:' 7 0.06 7 26.96- 1 00 .:0.65 '''' 1:60:':'::::-1!00.7.1•.' ',, `. ,2: ". , • . ': ..•...,'7':::„;;- ,./y':.., ', .d Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 yOlUnie(■iph) .1.. : : :: '' . 177-1.,:, 838 '' .185‘:::I; 350 If-38514.,:.695.- , 24. • ' 711 , • :',558 Y';'280' ',-.•• 757 °: .": • 250', Peak-hour factor, PHF 0 92 0 92 0.92 092 - 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 092 0.92 0 92 Adj,,FI6W (v0h) '' `,. • . 192 911":7::`291:": •738(c:::";',.962TF7597:: . - 26'7 773:-... :607. .-,':':"304 823•.; :2721'.:7'-, Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 911 201 380 962 759 26 773 607 304 823 272 Heavy Vihiclea-(%) - :" 3%-, '' '17;;'::'`::`,'..." 3cis.:70•7:167;.- . :71 eAT' 71W. .-: 50/....;:-. 5%: 5%6%- ..'..6%.': '6% . •, ;';',.'-: ',..., .,.- 7..,' .., Turn Type Prot pm+ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom Protected Priaies. • 1 ' s -2:,..: 7:::: al 4-..a-L5 ;71::::::- ,...:'..7"' •-',7-7.:777,:-;21,.'`.f .,' • ::-,6'.17:;:';'S....,.. :::::: ',,:i'i :•.',,!:......,.7.: '72.1,77:,--7,7,-17-7,77 Permitted Phases 4 81 23 6 7 Actuated :Gre0G Isi 1 6 ` . . 8 T ; ; ; 3 5 0 3 2 1 0 " 1 : 4 0 7 2 : 7 4 0 . : : : : : 3 5 1 7134:01:'...630;, . , - . ' 2 ' . . 0 " ; : : : : 51 '.'41'.."71'..4.;; Effective Gieen, g (s) 16.0 36.0 43.6 29.0 49.0 74.0 7.6 34.0 65.0 25.0 51.4 71.4 ACtuatedg/C:FttiO'..:.!, Z .:,0.11.:',:0`.26631:._70,11•I''-'70:352-7053: '..0.05!',:.'.0.24";: 04..,:.' 01I3!: 037 051 :" ..::::,.:, ...,.± 7: :''.. :,..77.73 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 !:.: 3:0:7 .-7.SO'N--.7376i,:.-7.7r.So17:;:a07.1:::e.7:77ai)7:-..'R,;',. L'..-*--1';'10;27-3-07,...-....,.,. .., - ....:• .-- ...: : ; . ..,.;- -- s :-....; Lane Grp Cap (vph) 200 901 533 370 1251 845 93 810 692 304 985 777 cr/e Ratio Prot , ‘ .,:: :".',•.:r•:';':0.11.,:75:ea.26 0.0-Z7-c021.:13:21747,":“T;;;TC1.627 c0.23. ,7: :-.:7 ii018,,:, : 0.31,-,-.,:.:7:77• 7... v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.47 0.39 0.18 ie Raiii. : - -::::::.' .... ::, ;606:';'-.1'.cii,f56*Tc,7iltdOrit7.1:kk:o.28'..;::;':156-5:::- 088, :' 106:::- - 0640`.6 2, :',:i,::::: :r:: '',.y...:12;;;;::::::;:::7„.7.s.,111 Uniform Delay, d1 61.7 52.0 37.6 55.5 40.5 29.6 63.6 52.2 35.0 57.5 40.4 20.5 progression FectOr .: ....'-`,',‘1:60::1..60 7-.I.00]lar.rioa)T6o-Ki0O1'.0-02: ',::'fOlO; - . . . „ : 1 : 00.73'...-;: i i 0 * t " A 1 1,1 Incremental Delay, d2 52.0 32.7 0.4 53.9 2.9 12.2 1.6 22.3 12.1 42.4 5.8 (..): .." ',I: . '.:..:113,7:--,;..f341_7 :.:..:41::',•109441°)....11"-8„;:;'::,:.:65:.,2:::-:17.4-5';:::f:471 :...:'.s81127._.:309:'.,:f24:.:?,:::•,:':':::::.:'z; Level of Service F F D F D D - E E D F C A Al5iiiiiieh bilai■ (i).1:::.:' ' -::T.:' -7".:141eif ---::.7:77-7-7'647CC',7".7:TS7.... • '"'.:...6..,:: .. :-.7,7::?,;5-6:V. :':,''."?.:;,i`f:',.. -7-• 7' i':',' ::: ''' '..'::7:-.1.-,f...`::7;':::::-7(77'.1.77:.ELL.:•::-;': Approach LOS F D E D • orrer.s7e7itirt nary : • T. HCM Average Control Delay 58.2 HCM Level of Service 14-,C9:-VG11761._.. et2.caPAcitY9tio:-:: : :Pl''::::- 100::`..:::;:l.:"1231:::;:'...:51ri. .1 '. ".::::,...,._ _....... ' '•;. ; CL7117:'1":17.77.7:::::":":: ,.:-.77,7, T39 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 1ntersectiCapacity_Utilization .....::,,,s....j..._ ....1.10:4% ....ict) Ler I ot:ServiceL.':::;[::'..,:_f_:.:1::.: ;:.10: f• _,....,_jr;`:'::'.,_;..e ?,::',':!•,,-•.1.7:-,,-;,...-,:',..2:,; c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy/I-405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy./Interurban 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak C 4- 4\ t P taiirle-FirjWar.SiEBIWEBnifiEl3-PatiN-6LIVEW,BTRTNBRiii-VNRW1BMNBRSM'w*SE(SWIRI Lane Configurations II + r 4 r 1 +4, r .1 tt r Ideal Flow l(Vphp); ' ,;., --,:.... 7 7.1906,:-S. '19.067190.02,7,1900. 1900 1900 1900 :: '1960 "" ' :1900 : fl sop :.' - 100 C'1,1900...-7,.: Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane. (Ail.: Factor , . , -...'••• -..- :::100*:.,:-10 -..;100 y,. .:.:::.:: _....100;... .1.00 . .1.00 ...:: 0 95 ..:. .100'.. 1.00 :0.-9$.,1;,,' .1.00 : ..,.:.;..,!„-....,..*.:_,.177: ..77.,i; ,: .f,,...........::•;:-,';c:f.:. Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 6:85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 PiPTcifeCied-7 ;--;'::. ::::7.7695-;-7100::T.f...0077:fi..-...17.097‘,17 1T00 ',":;;:i09."7.f.00 7:-,7166770:96::: 7-17015:7-107.7..17,.1'. Satd. Flow (licit) 1719 1810 ---1538 1841 1e16 1776 3534 1583 1736 3471 1555 Fit PErriiiited ..-:',.. 0.74'"1,c,',1.00'?'71.0(cf.:12,77, .L : : '0.89 ':::::100 '1 095,„ ,1.00 f • 1 '.., 0:95:: - 2" 100 .1.55., Satd. Flow (perm) 1344 1810 1538 1698 1615 1770 3539 1593 1135 3471 1553 Voltir,iie,(vph)■,' -. -, -• -,. ..- 356 ,-,' ',,:, 10 !. 433 .-.-.A4.13:-.... y,7•',,",16' is,/ 564 '1117. ...• 13 ,-;=. 54 .,.1155.1.z.. 299.„ :- `., '.*., ji,-;t-: - ',..;: Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 387' . 7.- 11 471:.1.7::::,,Tlii:::::e.":: . '')-7....-7,., ..,, Al 3::;7'1214'; :',..:-:14 77j597:7'..:.125:::---,q24-.r, ;:',.'77,f6.7,:. 77;7:::::,r : -....,77;17:7'..A Lane aroup Flow (vpt'..1) 387 11 471 0 22 613 1214 14 59 1255 325 HiaiiY.Niehide-i(b/4 ':,.-='..: 7 .. .5°h'' .:. :-.156/O7-•:, '55O77:!".1.:11‘,•.' .0'6%, :'..." ,2%;"::;": 4% ,... 4610.F.''',:. '4%;/.': '': ' :::..7"17.''':.!,; ,;"• : ';,:-',..: ' .... .: -.: Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom 0.016-1.011-efri 6'Pi;!..2.:.17::::::':07.17_7:....:':::'''.....S:',..I-473.....:'.:::.7:: ':.::, .',.,..- :;..52:::: ::;::;:;.:-...7.;11-:....".:Ti:::P7-7:ii.:..1 ' :::::,::::::::':...F...:::::,..."7:.77.f.::::::::L^'"1 Permitted Phases 3 5-6 .7 1 2 6 WettialGreen;LGIsi-,7:!:'..-47,5'-:;;',47:5V'';907047:57'.-59-.0:'':,'39.f:::=":7.5:8::".`"'.-76:8:.?',7::1:57i74:4'.279J7'777'::=.:77l::::::::?-:'..:;=',7T.;,' Effective Green, g (s) 47.5 47.5 90.6 47.5 59.0 39.1 75.8 75.8 7.5 44.2 95.7 rACtOted4CR4ti011_Z:.Y:7:9)..3.3,-:':I33 17:463 7:::.:::];::::. 010 0.***1-1- ::: 6.27: 053 . ' 0.537T...005.;: 0117.°..72.10-..577=::7,7..:1;:.:::': ...i.:2,7 , .-,,.7• Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 kritiiCleftitirraiiiiiiiY-77,773:CfJ;::?Slirt';.!:.flan7747.7-, [ 4.0 4.0 : 30"7:f 3.0a V :S0( 3:g- t gii,;77;0',7ii:,7-).;q'f,-,-;IV::..:‘,.;7-0:„:-:'.::TI Lane Grp Cap (vph) 447 602 976 565 667 485 1879 840 91 1074 1041 i/.7147.6110- ....Pia_ K14i,::'i'::::f;',':',TA(?0-s--6:5.,,-':':7d.-rk*',..._:.:.,•':7.::.,;....'C.:;::-7 v/s Ratio Perm .66.9 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.87 ;:,: a02C48.:.;`'...747C A:' 004 '6503 ', : 1..267:7''„,-0".65' ti:Ofic.: Olt ' : 1:177,7.76:51' Uniform Delay, d1 447 320 138 322 24 9 51 9 23 9 15.9 66.4 49.3 9.8 T.;abt-0.‘!.1:-r...:'''..145:2qDv:E.71:do:•-i';'31Z.:.:,;:t.:1:q0:176-9-3:':i 100- ''-1'1....Ob.Y;:1,....0b17P.IT' .ZKOCKT1.-0.97^'="7:',T.::7,gc.':iii:47-177-7-:',Y,717::'"'''-rj,7:17'..t Incremental Delay, d2 - 15.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 134.5 u.16 u.0 14.8 lisb.1 0.2 PFE.fi*:7;'.:17i:77:i XPIPi:07,71741:.:W:;?7i?7;;g.:01.:-4W--1*37:::-..:147.'1,-4:§77!-.0.1:4;-..7..;13-4747:=71'67(5?;r,7:477F-iPt.:7;7.7.'T'171777:::::77-',3 Level of Service E C B C C F C B F F A li.k.,001AiletibiLili..-(i)T::::::.'"'-j.:: ........7.,17::;'.7:•;:,7:-:::.?9.97..,'...i.:...,;.:::::%.*i:: :...s.-:i7E:.:.••.1..P.f1....: .,•.'.'ilc:...:7Z.:...7;.i48.6.1-;. ..1:.,IT:','; ....:7:::":..i.:::-,;:z.:..;;:5;!ci.,1. Approach LOS D C E F lnt v_r HCM Average Control Delay 80.7 HCM Level of Service F ITO-161176111.16 e;,515:1*-Taii6- ?7-.7::-;_77.1::i 10Y,Tnc:',',...t°:, "...7.7-7,':,i;1!.."---.777:7...',.." Actuated Cycle Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 teareti6ift..63iatilffilii-ation_;:::07".='i.J06:8$.7";;'•a:71CQ,Leiiel of:Seice.,...z. f4:- :,.."..!.:;":., -.:,.....:,,,77 :.::::-..:127::;.,7';:f.'2::_j:.:::::::Tt V`T;.:.°1i;.7.7:-.2:7;e:....:,::::-'71::..3:;:l.:k c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 4/28/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Movement EBL •EBT ESIALMBL 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak '- 4 _41 t /' `► 1 4' WBT W„f3 _ NB NBT NBR SBL 863 388 _ Lane Configurations 4 P .�s )deal Flow (vp(pl)_ , t v 1900, ".-1900`,Y 1900 ,;1900 '_ 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1:00; 100 '1-00 r 1A0`' :70:95::; 11 100 , x,095 b•A ,,,__ _____ _ ay.. ._.�.` ,: ft ' +t+ 1900-7.11W 1900�r7, 1900,; a :1900 10900 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 Ralco'ecied'� r - x.00.95• 100 `� . < `0.-§-6:77:77; 095 1 100' "L1 �.. � _ �..... -pro. ...`__.... ....._s...�. u._._�..._. Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1583 flt Permitted ` _ v - ,..',.. 0 76 100 •; Satd. Flow (perm) 1423 1583 1711 1770 3531 090::; 0.95 100 1580 1770 3531 1.00 0.99 _ 0 95 ' 100 .. 4 i._ 1641 3508 '" 0.9517 1,00 ^; 1641 3508 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 Ad) Flow {yph)r °2; A" ;�__:_. -,_78 _ _ 0_ Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 1 Leavy Vehicles ( %) : ' i iv; . , . 1 %; Turn Type Perm Protected Permitted Phases Actuated Grisen..G'(s)," .; _ 9.2 2; 9.2 0.92 0.92 68 a0_ r. l�K. -_ X16 :'at'?; j.�w.".om�':s.t5 _ =* 51'.iia.603Ktt.,,_`24 c: 4:.;. "__i:.�___.....•.._�`'��''''' ((��' 0.92-0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0T 1 17 ,'1062x° 2 0 17 1078 0 5 681 0 Prot 8j',77;" 40.5' 9.2 1.0 40 -5 1.0 40.5 Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gl.0 Rado_ . � _Z ^ ;•;___0 15 <, 015 _;' _r; :_,.. Q. ?5;�_:__:� .0.02 0 65 _._� •:A._- -__.........x._,_�.._ Wes...:._ -- ...,_.._._......,_.....__ Clearance Time (s) 4.0 _ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension ('s) 7 `. , r.. -, fi .c:3.0 s,13:0 f' -r. �r ;� 3 0 :a ; +3A 307: - �- R. a, ._ V"-7: .. f1,7, -'..` P° ..� ' w'1'- �': a �:a :O,e.,x:+:r3:0' ...: a v, � ,.� .�k ..�x Lane Grp Cap (vph) _ 209 232 232 28 2281 26 2266 v/s Ra6o Prot , . . :. ,::: . sz �Y ,. _ . _. ,: -. ..'z. _ .is i:49T.11 ; 035`...;:177.T. "0 _ , _.7 } `.. `yx "'`'K 1 s � 4" a00., •:0 19.-+sS r.:' . i.: _ ..cy:.. _- ,.._ a,:g v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.04 0.00 n-. 7 "' r 0.61 'N,0'47x 019 . 13.51V-7.,:.::' a - .R.x v /aRafx)� ✓ _ , 0.37; 029. ' 4�" 001- c _ '� ��' i _s J:: i.?�e.,. .t.. Y..__....a . _.. G.: .r .�.._...._ �... _..�,..r..... Uniform Delay, di 24.1 23.9 22.9 _ 30.7 5.7 30.5 4.9 Progr'ession.Factor :;- ;,,100: ;100, `Ir r' ;f.00}; sit Mirt,03A,:r1A0 . >is . _ ,t1 00 1:00 ,-- a i +§z r 'r: '' r.A Perm Perm 4. 8 d� 9.2 Prot .Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.7 0.0 • Dlay(s)'y.71. _`:.,. 253. 246 ... ...'._ 229'n '? Level of Service C C C Appr'oacti�Delay:(sji^ ` >- a :.7 x229 Approach LOS • 0 0.2 3.6 0.1 0.:. E A ntersectfon a Mar t.„ HCM Average Control Delay 7.5 HCM Level of Service A HGMiVOlumert'o- Capaclgr00,"; : 4 = 046 .:, ,T a: s L • Actuated Cycle Length (s) • 62.7 Sum_ of lost time (s) • 12.0 rtt`ersection Capacity.Utilization� t ,7-47 5 %: r jCU Level. of;Sernce r S r :.. ` i "` r ,; f ,-,;^'S ��- -�-�'_ . A,!_. +i....w.... �r,. _...- __..:. y 1 .�. , -ter-. k, <,_...r:.sL < .i'. c Critical Lane Group R: \03011 -60 \Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 1 2: 1-405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak -10. .n11, 4S 4• V/11.3J7grnent ■.,',,ZBIA1:111-3Tit-AEBRO)NBE7a1/l/1330771W.BRr7ASELWSE1104,=SERONWIMTNWTEG, Lane Configurations 4 r vt It _ 'I ti. r Weil *AT! (vPhrPif . :-.1906 .j9-skr.c.:1 0097. , 966:...-, 1900 ::::.(scip 7.i 00 17.:1 Sold ,T ibbot;;:.:91507:10645 7 71 .600 . Total Lost time (s) 4.0 • 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Calie util. Faator.. . .,... i.' ixicivs '.. fci• 7.-. i :W-.7 , 1:07:5: ":... 160 :2646 ', .: 1:.66.7..106 :: 00-..."-.7 - Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Said. PFOW(proi) 1761 1524 1667 I676 1719 3438 1538 1736 3370 Flt Penbitted . : r':. '7, ; ','" .*:‘ 0:98' -:-1:(x577.7.07-6-5'77-466 7 .7::: -7 045 r TO ''''1:06;:.7 015 'i-6-6;:=..:: Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1524 1687 1679 1719 3438 1538 1736 3370 Volume(vph) : ‘ . ..59 -..,2..107::;:.'389,„i' 137.L„,:. ; 79. ' :.',.'45,,..:•. 561.';,:ir...9.06 ..'• 61 ,:.. 40,4.;.2: .770 185 .:::72...;;'.1`':':i..,._:2:::::::!?-1`.1::,_,,_:,..d.:''",, Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 -6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.42 0.92 Kcil, Fl_01"!(Y-PIV.::-- 07:27_71:6f '1-77985.T.`E§4,1.0-...'.1':.6,3 ....1'".7 ?OE"- 7...71i.-7:-'.;i7R.,-7.7!::;77:: 7,7171 Lane Group Flow (vPh) 0 180 423 149 135 0 61 985 66 439 1038 0 6%. 5/;;.-- -5-.Wi..-', IV.75,.- - , -5°?..."7--.' .5%'-'::' 5647'7464: .".- 4..A.-....- ' "-454; Turn Type Split custom Split . Prot custom Prot Protected Pfiiiii- %.7 •, -1-c;._2 :'-..- :72-7 -.7: 6 :76:71.:.::i.4.: ..7:75 .....-:77.■......-±:,0221,..:;; Permitted Phases 2 23 6 42 ActUiTe-St PreeP, G(s) ...':;:;.: ' .:':,-.. ,...!.17-.P ..:7748:. P''....116.6..16§i 6.6',...743-8::'.161.62. '1.266 ..."t 6.60;.:';'..:3'(:;:'.1•'...7,c!'-'1'.7. 7 7.7..'!"..:72-",7".F.' Effective Green, g(s) 17.8 486 15.6 15.6 .6 43.8 e1.6 26.8 65.0 gatit.afeTdg/CFt4tiii:, .', - : :: . 7 .1 . - 7 : ::3:015::T946317137,..,. 013 , ..,....005•L036'..::‘6•;51: 022‘., .954:--.....--.., Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • 73.67.75...T77:173.el,73707-7.7:-..7..-- 73.07,-F-3.-67;':7.7.,'-7 F 77 3" 6 47,- . . :-. : ..4- -' ;T.!' ''./..,:- '‘''',.,-.i.4'4'...;*.:). FT.?. ,7.A. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 261 617 219 218 80 1255 790 388 1825 Virs-Ritic1151151 '' -• ,:,, '''.:'‘. 0-..107'71-7..77" cif 09771.1.06,F 15-47.66W..,.:777.'''COT2:5;7;'67Jf:::.7,7:,,I.:-':':::-IT:,-17f,577.:...,2•,...',-T:::7-::::::.i:&7...77-773 v/s Ratio Perm cii.iii 0.04 VieAiiiii:7. 1 : , :.:.:. :: .;.:..- ' 060-.-,-; tiffi..7.;:y68:2. :0.62 7-..;...z;s.. [7.- 6.1C-:,:ii18 1:0687,.I.13;:!::*)) -51;yi' '1 : ..f.'717.17L:".;:. Uniform Delay, di 48.5 29.4 49.8 49.4 56.5 -33.9 14.8 46.6 18.2 probeessiOri'...E.qc-tor .0Tlilzi-.60----7.-i7-)07 -?..:-.CoT).-:::-.7-.:77:7 f o-O-7'*.T.otiK:;-.-rtitiTiIso'....�:dir:T..:7:',',..C-.:,:'.7:;;:--:-.i':;:":-7.'::-,737:;?.i,F:s:.if'a--;,E.T ;7:1 Incremental Delay, d2 3.2 8.4 5.2 34.2 5.0 0.0 76.1 0.7 17071airli.)-7:,_ -. ,.,.. ,.,,,_,:'.. _,;:1:,:§06-7.811,2 J.2.,514' 67 _,..':::::11:,* 96777-f., aff'r :1:4 97i7113.27.'12'.9•27.:',.: _. Level of Service E C E 6 F D B F B APfro9004i, (0 !,,,.12;2:;:...... .,., :2 395 ' .::::,21.:L:-Lf. 6,...5.;:-'.;:..:::::'L::.__. _..:''';': 40.3 .?1..1'7..Y.'•:;: 7::':...:;-'5'L.77.7:::::::.-....-.:','':',77:;7:::z:,::T: ,.1':1 Approach LOS D E D -0 intersection son, - • " HCM Average Control Delay 42.5 HCM Level of Service D .0.-- - -,..- -.",r• .t.7-7,,,- 7 7,-,-m. HCAVOltirnOo. Capacitylatid '.777.-. .f : - 083' , ;- ., „,.,:,_;„ . , ,- i .,,. : ,. -:-.: : - 75 .....'..,. , 7 .:, ,...•;:7...,'...„.,:. , ., .,...,,,,, . ,. ....., ,.., „ ,.„...,:. ( ActuatedCycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum oflost time (s) 12.0 ififirieCti- oil-Capacity,Utilization:::, 1"7: 82..8TO '. l' L..,:,.1,CLILeyel:6(Seryice,..,7:" ,‘ , : -, ,;13...,.:_,:z. .:.&,:`...r.,,.7.:.;;: .."1:.,,,i7.-2.c.z7.4.,., '7_2.: I .'"• '',..,-.7.7'''"7-x.„ c Critical Lane Group FIA03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 5/1/2003 Page 2 • 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak Lane Configurations ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) • La "ne l)til"Factor Frt FItProtected. Satd. Flow-(prot) Flt°Permitted , _ Satd. Flow (perm) s - 7 {~ >7. P •-• 4 Movement ,:EBL T egO WB WBT EITA NBt2 jNBL NBR, I`.SEL SERi;,c-SER2 ►s.._ ++ r ��� �' '� `�'� r � �� r 1900 19008: 1900 a ;1900 :1900 ' 1900 - 1900:. ,1900;'.` 1900: 1900. __1906, ;' 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • 1:00 095,`` 100 1:00: 0 95 100 1.00 :0.97 '2:1160; 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00_ _ 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.95 100 ` 100. ':7116.6:7; 100 too 0 95 ' 0.95 .100 0.952.:j 100 ,100 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 17193 -3335 w1538 ` 1703 2682 1524 0 :95 1:00' .1,007 .; 095. _1 00 1.00 0 95 : 0 95; .100 0 95 100 100 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Nolume.(vph), Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj Flow (vPh) __ _.;. `167_ 792• 175:., "..332 837 660._`�_i93 768_ "528` 2§.5.1,_._:. 759 .141 ,_:;, ,.. ;,-,�, .. Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 r 792 175 332 837- 660 193Y ` 768 _ 528 ~ 265 759+141 Heavy Vehides ( °k),�. - - ":71°A.`::7-36/;:-.34.71.7;' '> .1 %,,°r: 1% > .1 /o. , -. 5% -< . 5% :".:7:5%- 6%' ".`•:,6 /0 '-:6% . 5.:., rc r;:•"- '..k.e Tum Type Prot pm +ov Prot _ custom Prot custom Prot custom Orotected Phases�._,.._::r_- .7_ .. 4:: . 55 .~:.,s-M1g_> `c 8„ u7 � _ §:, 'L.?xn.._ ._.. >? 1_.. ._6.�_ � 4; Permitted Phases _ 4 8 1 y 2 3 6 7 Actuated Green G s r`+' 14 2 - `28:0:. 440 !x'23 0 _ `36 8 . 5_5, 8.; 16 0 34.0> 57 0_ - 19 0, : 37 0 -51.2 - Effective Green, g (s) 014.2 28.0 44.0 23.0 36.8 55.8 16.0 34.0 57.0 19.0 37.0 51.2 Actuated g/C; Ratio y;= 112. '•` 0.23',;,; 0:37, :' 0 :19."'` a31,,-..1 oA.C<.0.13, , ;Q28'L; 0:48 r. •' 0:16] .0 31 _ , ,_043_ _1?, Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1 4.0 4.0 Vehia Eztension.(s) -{ el3.0 3.0' 1`3.0'''17.:3.0; . X3.0 .3.0 7-3107777-77,73:677:73:01'7 -._ ;; ' 6. ` Lane Grp Cap (vph) 207 818 575 343 1096 744 229 945 731 270 827 650 ; 0:10 c0 23. ;7 004 c0:19'` ;,10 23: `. 011 - an ; i c016 "c0.28 0.07 0.41 0.34 430 0 97w k0;76; ,0.89 ; _084 u 0 81q: �:;0 72 =;g, 098 do 92 51.6 45.6 27.1 48.1 _ 37.7 29.2 50.8 40.0 - 25.2 50.3 40.0 - 21.7 i 00 100: 100 100 1:06+:' " 1.00 1.00 100 7 "31'00tiy- x.0.81 x6_64 :O.:4-1:,,;„, `� `>` ••'� ^ = `1 .. J.0 _._ __9 :..- _.._..- ,.. -3.2 s...___..:..... u�..,C..._..�.. -.a.. 3..5 _ .. . ?__.._.�.�..... n...._x._......sni $st?:.0 -.t.5 20.1 W 23.6 0.3 39.6 3.2 12.4 23.5 7.6 3.5 41.6 13.1 A 0.1 71.6 , 6_9.2'":27 4M X87 7 f. 40.9%7 ;j:4)7677:1471:', V 4773W 5i ; X9.0 ; . '°7... e.-: -' 4 , Lii Level of Service __ E E_ _C _ F__ D D E D C F D A _ Approach Delay (s)_ . :_.A ` _ 631j ,., . <._'. ,1 : 49 6 _i:c. -.s _ ..- _� 44 4T,. L•"ri I7,...7,,47.- . ? I. < , ' - "+'s ;,4,.1.-.."'_ r :.„ , s i.°i Approach LOS E D �D D 154' '..729 ;,� r161 _" .305 ;y770 `, ^607„ 178 707 _486 244 696 130,: .: 0.92 0.92 0.92 J0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 v/s Ratio R% v/s Ratio Perm Via-Ratio Uniform Delay, dt ProgressionFactorx Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s),', •. ,�"'; nterse ooe um fi HCM Average Control Delay 50.0 HCM Level of Service HUM Volume tii Capacity ratio 7_ , 0 97 . 1 y ""'7'4 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersecon Capait Uhiabon :7. , '101% ICU L el of Sece " _ ' ;, F _° .: _ � _ _. .: ::f ,_ : c Critical Lane Group 160 R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 3 _ *:VV)/Mvy8~m5NB ramps & West Valley Hwy/ntemrbon 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Projec Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom ' Prot Perm Prot custom Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 2 6 3 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Grp Cap (yph) 525 705 1019 669 757 434 1683 753 89 977 1085 HCM Average Control Delay 74.2 HCM Level of Service Actuated Cycle Length (s) . 142.8 'gum of lost time (s) ��^~'_- c entical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chan ~pvojemxmoupm Peak Hour.sy6 AMH 5/1/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak t `• 1 4' KIM WIN WOW, MK EWE MAR E B . W &WO NIS VIM B IWA B MN NOTtrAP413 R STI? S biESAT8grA S B /3 ' ''' ' . ' r 4 urations nfi Lane Cog 4. . _ 11 +1. Ideal Flow,(vphply,,,..:,...• .1900, , 1900- -7.1900 ; 1900: . 1900 -...: 1900 • 1900-v -1900 t- 1900 ;..1900:..,1900.t 1900',-;..;,-..'. '.`', ,. . , ..- • .,,,.., '1 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 -470 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ei-neOTictoi. ': '. ' '':--77J'..1.W71T0 ti.77--7 11:6077 . : . 1.00*r .0.95 ' ' v,.1 .00.-. t,.0.95% .14 1.00 0.85 -6.-9-3 1.60 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected ,- _-:::: 1...!"..,.:.;C:::Y -0.95,2: :, ... r 067, ,, ,- ...:;.,;: . .. 0.0frf`,,,,,.:: :.;70.9.67too.:;:,,..1:72;13.96:11:.1..00 Satd. Flow Ciiiiij 1787 1583 1711 1770 '.35.31 . 1641 35158 - 6-16' .71-0-0°,77-7;27769Vii°775.'''" '7".09 1.00' .':'-': . ' ,095 Satd. Flow (perm) iii-23 1-583 1580 1770 3531 1641 3508 ,y,..bturne(Vph)_ ."‘,.,:l-.“‘,..., ..,:,-', 83. ,•,.,:: , .01,:..3l. ,79:::.y..i=:.1•:?.5::„,e,01:,1:.,ii,::1, ?2 , 28 -,-1.121', : • .":17.•:'-':,,a6,!j,;', 6B9 28;-:..':..:,:, ::‘,.:::,i-.1. J:`.;,,,,,...L..,..:; Peak-hour, facfor, P-1F 6.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0:92 4: 10,1?(v01...i)....-1,-..- ,..',- „ ' '',..' PP:'-::: P..::,?P :".1 ,... i..2.._, ....,..-:_i_.. : 30 . „...-... _...; -.. ....18 - ..._.17 .,..,:_:.::.7 .........,..PP.; Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 76 0 2 0 30 1236 0 7 779 0 HeaViVehides (°/0)"-.:- )..,. ..,.: *1%" :,:1.9f;.'...' 2%c[7:. 2%;*....:' 0%7" ,. 10%..:-•`-2%,:: ,,,•-• •2% .::2%:.."-.7'.10%:- 2%::*; .;10% 1‘ 4 ::::',-.:,,n :: i:'.,,.., .* ,,.777" : • 1 Tum Type Perm custom Perm Prot Prot PriiteatidF.itiaies ' :-.;• '1,--'i•::-.7:-:,:;:r.,:r.::47,77.....'',':"I':-:, 777.7271017i-"--"; 7r5"'4c: .-'2.77'''''-;:'-''5''''',717-":...f:'6',.'t7C70."t'ri Permitted Phases 4 :4-g 8 VicitiatedGrieiii -Gi(s):"'.°.';:'.i.:.,:j:72.1.5:.;::141.-7.77:171.72.".-9:67:7 7::;...i:,I164i.-21018, .': !..2'...:::,.1..0" ..,',.;35:4;'"''`:. ',..'?':',.:3 ';'. ,:'..... '• '.7:F:17-7f 7 ,.... ---.,:.: ,.,.....:-... '3 Effective Green, g (s) 9.5 19.9 4.5 674 40.8 1.0 35.4 r6cluatedslc Ratio-:..,7:' .71:77:7°,.;102i57:: ',!0.-S177.:7"--,-V:.:.11.1-67.--7:17:7 iiib::f 7.064' 1.: ::::.:'72;r0.02....,.'0.56.,...... ':,"1..r...:,`..--.,- -...: Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Mehicle,Extension (s-i'.7T--,77.-1, • 73.0 .,.7, ..`;`,,,".: 3.077.73.0::. .,':':...•,',",•.`•::-T3.0 '.--q' ‘ 3.0', .,, *:' , .•,> :' *,../,.; --,-,-- Lane Grp_Cap (vph) 214 498 237 179 2276 26 1962 140--9-:r0:7-'''':_, 0060-„3571.:%''. i:..JP.i90,: 69.&!.:,..:.7.'..:7,..c.7:'.:. ws Ratio Perm cu.ob 0.05 6700 0A20:15e7'775 . 4 ''Lo :Oil Z:::7 :, ,-.:9 17 W...' A5 4'i ::::'....'.f;;.:..P27.:.,:.040'. i,-;;;;;_:.1.:‘::..:.:.._.-!._;:, Uniform Delay, d1 24.4 15.6 22.9 26.0 6.2 30.8 7.9 Pro4tession Factor .•:-.1'.00,:: 1 .00-A'7;4'.,%'',Mf0---071rA,,:77-',:,.,1*ON r.71160.::', id, -45:::.71.00:A41100. '',.,'...: '..,:i,„,,_, -.::,,,.... : : ,,s. -: • :ft.,P-,,,,--= Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 5.5 0.1 '.25.7.. , . . • 26 5„ -.. '64 ,. ,-..., 36 3 . 80 , ,- .; - ....'s , •: ...s -.. . . ,.. ...,- .. .- - •-ri,e17-' Level of Service C B C C A 0 A -!‘:":-":t: •T‘,.' ---7775;1'714. Approach LOS ntersf=c-tr"Tori Summary I-1CM Average Control Delay 8.5 HCM Level of Service ‘161urTe t9.calSPilY:rTatio.-:::Ii::;i' '''...7.1.0-53.7,:ri:27.:=7.7.,=.:1-.';'.17:11-JF:',7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.3 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 titerseCtion'.c *city Utilization -:11.... - 2 52.6% ,'.., : ICtflevgl'of„Service ..,...',•;11 ...'.... : : TA..' .:. • ... . :...1.,':':,'?,::,', ,::-..7 .._ :2. c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour-2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 5/1/2003 Page 1 2: 1-405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south hall) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak WagrneritiPIZAtt,._ EB EBR-44Vil BLIEWIBTAc WBTISOVICATSETitSER: NWCZNV.i/iT/t14WR Lane Configurations 4 , r ) ___1.._ _ _ , t+ r vi ft. rdoiiplowo?-p-ho 1 r:: '7. .-.T0007 -..TWO-0- - 1-WO 7.2:1§0-0. -, 1900, : -100-0-v.7..-1§156: T 100-07.1-000-'-'10 '17-1-90.0771§00r.'": ----'7- Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,Lne Utfl. Factor -. :,..:' ::: • ' ,' 1.09:,■_. *;.1.00. ' ' 1.00 ; • "..f00 ,.• , ,:, ,.." ,.., 100 ";.: • 0.95: 1-,00.: 1.00 ',.. Q95' Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 filpiiilected'1,..:!.',..7: .. 77.: -1 096': 100....0:05..i. '05'100 .:% .. 0.9-',..72 100"100 ::.'095 • z::t..00., Z.:7 . -,..:....,......, --'..'.._.-,?•,..7-::;:, ..':.-7,-..:. T .. _-_-....;:_:--:-,-...)-: 7-f`,''); Satd. Flow (prot) 1758 1524 1687 1677 1719 3438 1538 1736 3378 Flt Peri:Miffed :: -....*:... L-.....,- ' J.,::: ;•• 0.98 , : ,1 W. -- 0.95 .i.1..00L, ..,... t'...7: : Ft) 95 '-.. 100',; „..,100:., , 0.95.T1:0-6-q7,,Z,-7.-,:77.7-'*':71.:;77-':...-f-T"..7-1.:...-....T.'..,±.",-.7:-:.:"7; Satd. Flow (perm) 1758 1524 1687 1677 1719 3438 1538 1736 3378 VolUme,.(v131"))': '', .. : .. : '-' .6.8 :'.. 19P.1:::; 447: : .1 g:::..'1,:-„::: q4: .:: §.0112--§?-:' .1041 :-::::: 70 :- ,sop.::: ..L.8a5:,:= 192 :,....,:: ._;;;::::::, •....,:...2..:::, .„,.., ,::::2..,....:;:i ,,.„,) Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Nij.FlOW:(Vli) :::.,_.-J.'.........: z.7412.:-..-1 17 ' 4-40jo07. :ii -.'.;54:.:*'.3fqj-::::,...11.).?:::::..77-§2:::;::,•:05?.. '700??0:::::7..-".5-7',7L7.:-::::147.::::::-::::1::.:::;:.-:::::-.71 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 191 486 165 145 0 63 1132 76 652 1171 0 Heavy VehiC(%) . '-.:. T...6%.',.... 6%,7.17 6% .;.. -..7%.T.777%77,:- .7% ' ..B`Ye - ; : 5GY0 5°A. .',:,•4% .. ,.4:-.42'10-;'.2.--...,-77:".:-.. 7-''.-7.'..:.T:'-77 Turn Type custom Split Prot custom Prot Split Prialiefia-Ph-a-s-ei ' I:::TT2:::::: '--..-:.;.-----7.....':': :7::6:'.77:.T7P:::::: 7.7.-:-... ::-.7t::', :7,4:7 '.',,...,::::1.7::3:-.1.:....:!:?'[...:,7:.`: ::'''',..:. Permitted Phases 2 23 6 4 2 'Actuated Green,vG (6)L__ ..;.:',._Ti' ..:..1'.:..2.1 4.....7.1'.-?_::. :18.P;:::: la:,:-j.,.2.', 7::::13P.:1Jfr11..;',:i.§2..§44:'..43152.• ::*._ '.":-;.:::'.17.:':.;:''' Effective Green, g (s) 21.4 71.3 18.6 18.6 8.8 48.1 69.5 45.9 85.2 ACtiiited:gt. C-Fiatib: .1477....:7,15407..z,:ccfr-:--6127;:.10601:7632-:704-s-F '76:3)5i77:17:7''': 4.0 4.0 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vetirole7Exterision (s) 77 7 :. ;7: -.376',. ::;...,, s ,..;: 3.64:rF-3...017.- -., '.......,...`V....-3.0:, ' 3.0 .7-..:-..-,:s.:' : ,... 3.073.0';'7?.. Lane.Grp Cap (vph) 251 724 209 208 101 713 531 1919 Fi/.4.:FtalfP.ii?i7 7-:` . 7j, .-::::.::-7.:.:',:: ii.0..ii3:7FT.TI.:..1;c0101;11._::00?'.11`::::,..::::.700.41....760.40.4.7.=,01-5.1..'..:-•:=7:71'.17--.:q41:::.7.:-:.1...'7.;:7::11...77.1 v/s Ratio Perm 0.32 ..___. _ 0.05 .677,076i:::!;!.oi7977,- ii.767:::4:27:::.:77qf,;:77.0Tif,71-1-207-7-:;: Uniform Delay, dl 61.8 30.3 63.8 63.0 69.0 51.0 22.7 52.0 21.4 rdrkF,liai'::::1. 7 :AC., ..I09 1-.0:07:.1..09 :1:-100', ....2 i'..::..1;-'71:'0, .::-...:i:00?:..".:f.O.q'i...'70.?4-f,t1:0:0771-17:7.-.7::f:'...:-...7::5::::;,:7:-7::',":::::17-".j. Incremental Delay, d2 12.7 . 2.5 17.7 9.7 . . .. 11.4 34.3 0.1 108.0 0.5 ",••••••-,,,,-1,.....:::.;..-::!,,_-,,:..:.:S:::::...,.‘74.Cp-..K13:1.,....-.77-f._*7.1:77:. : `.,:":7•":.._ osy4,1.:: 852 ,:::?2,8.,,., 14.5,5 .. 713,13,72.,2..,..;7...:::::..71,,:,:,....:.:17:47.-_;".7:7-....F.; 771 Level of Service EC F E F FCF B rmiritoachpelay (0_ ':.,,,-.:.2...- ,L:,244.6..,: .1.12..,ji..1...1:1..g, 77,451,7,-;,, .:;',....L7:--.;. :.........,...81..3,- .:::,..LLL.,...‘7.. -!..,:--:,-;:‘, 6-6791.":72it-7:. i7,-.7".:1777.7.2 Approach LOS D E F E Memect mma RCM Average Control Delay 65.8 HCM Level of Service E HO-100!Y.51Ertc., _ = _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 1503 sum of lost time (s) 16.0 1 , „ICU 1.,ey.elntSenrice: c Critical Lane Group R:\03011-60\Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour-2.sy6 AMH Entranbe15-FF51 5/1/2003 Page 2 • 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) - 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak Movement EBL Wr EBRISiiw•BL WB BR NB Y NBL NBR &SEL SER SER2 1900 1900 g. 1900, Ell 900 1900 `7;1900 .1900 "J900. . - 1900 < 1900 1900 i ,1900 4 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Configurations_ Ideal FIOw (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Frt Laiie U6L Factor`. Fit Protected- Satd. Floc (prot) Fit'Permitted" Satd. Flow (perm) 100 0 95 1.00::..100 0 95 1:00 100, 0 97 100 100 .088 1:OC . 1.00 1.00 0.85 1 "00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0 "85 X0,95, ",' 1 .00: ,`100,1„ 0.95)' 100 - 1.00 0.95 ' '•0.95' 100: 0.957- - 1.00 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599. 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 T. 0.95 100 ..1 00 0 95 1.00 100 : 0.95 0 95 100 ° "..0 95 ' 100 1752 3505:1568 1787 3574 1599 1719.3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Volume (4ph)_ 177 y Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 AiiPTOW (vPh). 192 Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 Heavy Vehicles ( %) -`, :" Turn Type Prot Pbtected;Ptiases`7 Permitted Phases 1_3.§..i.,-.: : 185'• 3_50 885:' , 698. 24 a `850 558 280 796 250 ti ",.. e '1 "' i 8i3 ; 0.92 -0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 _____ 911 201.. c_ 380L ::, : 962 '75_9 - 26 924 _ • 607; µ'f 304 t 865 _ .._272 t .,,. _::a _^fr �� �, . ,, `� :. i 911 201 380 962y 759 26 924 607 304 865 272 _r ., :'3'� '- , .3%, -. .1%- 1% "ta,•1 %'.` : 5 ° /u. .,5 %°.. 5 °k'" .6 %: _ 69'° ' .. 6% , •. . , , pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom _ 4 L81 23 6▪ .7 ActuatedGreen G {s)1 ., 1. _18 4 .'37 Off -46-6 7.e.--3-0707:1 -48:67,151T6' Effective Green, g (s) 18.4 37.0 46.6 30.0 48.6 73.6 Actuate0 g'/C "Ratio_;.' »_ - .012{ ,r0 25 0 3J,_ O032 .: 0,49_ Clearance Time (s) . 4.0 4.0 4.0 . 4.0 4.0 Vehicle- •ExtenswnT(s) .=3 3.0; ^.';3.0;' :`3:01 ; 3.OhY E307i,,. Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 865 487 357 1158 785 vv %s Ratio Prof TT 0 ] T=_'''c0;26 v_ r_0 "03. c0 21a. �` 0.7ti.'.; v/s Ratio Perm "0.1-6 cO.47 u/c Ratw_ 089 1 05 " 6.,_41-,-,14:1 _ 1.06 ',0 83 ! c. 0:97 Uniform Delay, d1 64.8 56.5 40.9 60.0 46.9 37.0 P, [ogiessioi Factor:- .. :1.0911-7,1,00--. "1.00: J1 00 ny:1:00•i. -1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 .33.8 .45.6 0.6 65.7 5.2 24.0_ . -42-.07° 72-0 ; 250 9.6 42.0 72.0 25.0 57.4 751 006 028 y048.3 017.. 038'J:051 4.0 4.0 a 4.0 4.0 110 934 738 284 1026 770 - 0.02,�c028 c0318 X032 , _ 0.39 u 0.18 .....'0.:34.);.1R? 099 082i07 = O 84 035 r �" i "" 3 'r= 66.7 53.8 33.5 62.5 42.2 22.3 1;00;,1:00 i 001 05 ^, °;O:E 1.1 27.0 7.4 57.0 4.2 Q61ay (s) _ -- : 98 7 102 1 ,- 41 5 12571 : ;' 52_ , : 61_ A f._'• 67.8~ 7 80 8 40 9 °, 122 4 30 1• Level of Service _ F F D F D E E F D - F C 2kpp_roach Delay (3)_: _. __ L __ :92 2 ._ ..r.''F.,w._L. 68 S.r a¢ _. _ .:•65'O . 44.1 Approach LOS F u E ntersec4on ummaryr +P _} cs , HCM Average Control Delay 67.2 - HCM Level of Service Volume.to Capacity rdbo. -' 1701. i v - r Actuated Cycle Length (s) T - 150 0 Sum of lost time (s) - Intersecho_n Capaaty Utlbzabon, _ 1162% IC_U, Lev_e_I of Service __._ .1,: c Critical Lane Group • 120 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour -2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour [south half) C~ 4\ t P ti 4 4/ 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak :emet\i MBL EBT BR VIIBL TNEir4 1R4r -F NBR SBL• S13T SB Lane Configurations_ Ideal Flow (vphpl)" Total Lost time (s) Lane Uhl_ Factor Fit FIt Protected Said. Flow (prot) FIt Permdted. Satd. Flow (perm) 1.9007, 1900 1_ 4.0 4.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 0.95•` 1.00. 1719 1810 1 0.74 100 - 1344 µ1810 1 r d r 1 T4 r 1 ff r 96071::18602.: 1900.. `• -1900 1900 ., .1900.. ;1900. ,1900 .1900. :1900. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0' 4.0 4.0 1:00. .',100. 1.00 1.00 0.95 100. "7100 `' 0.95 x.1.00 �,,- -"_ 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 _ -1.00 0.85 _ 1:00` , _, ._.--"-6:9? 100'^ 0.95 '- :1.00r . 100 . -0 95 100, : :00Z. :_- _._____ .: a__..__. 538 -i641--i675- 841 -1615 1770 j5-56---16§5.-. 539 1583 - 1736 3471 -15_53 _ i.0O a •090 :1.00 0.95 _ 1.00.. • .1.00 0957 - 1:00,W� 538 1704 '11615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Volume (Yph) _ . 495' Peak -hour factor, PH, F 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph1_ _ _ _" ._ Lane Group Flow (vph) 538 i eavyVehicles (`io) Turn Type Perm custom Prot Protected_Phases, .. .. Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 Actuated Green, G (s) ` 56 6 _ 56.6 Effective Green, g (s) 56.6 56.6 94.6 Actu_at stitc Ratio �° _0.40 0 40' 0.66 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Eicteensio'rr(s) - j70 -- l 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 533 717 1019 •v /s,Ratio Prot' -77-77 • • • 0 of v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.31 v/c Ratw: 1.01:_`0.02 r_0.46-7 Uniform Delay, dt __ 43.1 26.2 11.7 Plogression Factory y w1�00_ 100 y 100 Incremental Delay, d2 41.3 0.0 0.3 Delay is) - ' yJ_ 84:4 26 2 12 1 10 433 '- 13 7 16 `564 .; 1.117 13 ; 54 `.1155 :338 • ,.,_. . 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 11 • 11 471 0 22w 17 613 1214 -14 59 1255 367 5%7' S%. . • 0%: 0% . 0%': ," 2% • 2%` .{ 2°h : -: 4 %- ' .4%'t; 4 %:'.':. • - "'' t custom Prot Perm Prot custom Level of Service Approach Delay (s)_�_ Approach LOS ntf tersec>io Summ -; F C 8 D _ 56.6 66.1 _..,. • __0•40i, 4.0 63 34 ;0, .•' 68.7 68.7. 5v5 : "40 21x;100.8 °" 34.0 68.7 68.7 5.5 40.2 100.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3'0 .'.3.0 :0:` *3.0 : "773 :O+s-6 ; . 675 748 421 1703 762 67 977 1096 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.24 .0.02 _, 071, -,OA2• 0.88 1'.28 0_:_t. ��_J6._::.c - ...� Y`, 26 4 .26 .8 54.4 29. 194 68.3 51.3 8.1 1.00 100 10.0 10O:..t_100,•. 100 ?�.00r;t'.00 -=zi -' : :f: ._.r_9.,• 5:._ 00 00 218.1 1.4 0.0 697 135.9 02 C C ° F C... _. B_ F F A 24 0 .,.... .. .._...,._.. ,. 111 1 ..... ,: c146:4'1<�xS":3_: `r.�'..,..'•^.- -�� '�c:__.� --� - `-r --- -- .:_%.�°� HCM Average Control Delay 109.8 HCM Level of Service F HCM`Voluie io-.Capacity ratio . .-•,•:,,..; 1,21 ' ._ - . _ ..... ._ -:°__ °tl...._ k ' 'C ,. ".0..: 11�` '? -- Actuated Cycle Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 _ 1n_tersechon.Capacity_Utihzatwn ` • : : ' . 1151% _ ICU Level of Seryic9, -. , • rt G �. • ,* ,.4E - ;._;c _t7. ".I c Critical Lane Group R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour -2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 4 • STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX C SOCCER FIELD TRIP GENERATION DATA • • TABLE C -1 SOCCER FIELD TRIP GENERATION DATA SUMMARY ITE Journal on the Web / February 1999 'Trip Generation at Youth Soccer Complexes: Some Unforeseen Issues." By John D. Fricker OpTrans, Inc. / March 2000 "Trip Generation Analysis - Twin Creeks Soccer Fields" Sunnyvale, CA Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) Starfire Peak Hour Activity Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) 47 per 2 games 10 games 235 Entranco Report 244 Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) ITE Potential Independent Variable Starfire Independent Variable Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) Sample No.1. (Small Fields) Sample - No.2 (Large Fields) Indoor (Small Fields) Outdoor (Large Fields) Acres 9.03 4.3 2 25 126 Parking Spaces Undefined 0.39 0 450 176 _Playing Fields in Use 49.25 21.52 2 7 249 Players Present 2.24 0.72 40 196 231 Entranco Report 244 OpTrans, Inc. / March 2000 "Trip Generation Analysis - Twin Creeks Soccer Fields" Sunnyvale, CA Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) Starfire Peak Hour Activity Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) 47 per 2 games 10 games 235 Entranco Report 244 � Trip Generation at Youth Soccer Complexes: Some Unforeseen Issues THE PURDUE STUDENT CHAPTER OF ITE HELPED THE AUTHOR COLLECT TRIP GENERATION DATA AT THE TWO BUSIEST YOUTH SOCCER COMPLEXES IN INDIANA. THE RESULTS ARE EXAMINED, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE DATA COLLECTION ARE OFFERED. AS THE POPULARITY OF YOUTH soccer continues to grow, more special - purpose facilities are being built to sup- plement and /or replace the recreational areas that soccer shared with other sports in its early years in many locales. As the parent of a child who plays on a traveling team, the author has seen youth soccer complexes of various sizes and of varying quality. Some are adjacent to residential - developments; others are still separated from other active land uses. Some have dozens of fields at one location. As new soccer complexes continue to be built, it would be helpful to be able to estimate the traffic generated by such a land -use type. In built -up areas, soccer - generated vehicle traffic could have a major impact on nearby intersections. Recreational soccer matches are often scheduled for early evenings (during the evening peak period) or Saturday morn- ings (in conflict with traffic for shopping and errands). Access drives to youth soc- cer complexes usually do not meet war- rants for traffic signals, but the complexes can cause significant congestion during the relatively few times at which they are active. In less - developed areas, a soccer complex could become the major genera- tor when it is in use. If the road network and traffic- control measures cannot accommodate the traffic generated by a soccer complex, a procedure to predict the traffic volumes would assist the devel- opers of a soccer complex and the local transportation officials. The Purdue Student Chapter of the aY • Institute of Trans- portation Engineers (ITE) undertook • ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 data collection for trip generation at the two busiest youth soccer complexes in the Lafayette, Ind., USA, area. Because "Youth Soccer Complex" is not a land - use category in the sixth edition of ITE's Trip Generation,' several issues had to be addressed before the data were collected. This feature summarizes the issues involved and offers some suggestions to anyone interested in collecting data at youth soccer complexes. THE SITES The first site was McAllister Park, located on the east bank of the Wabash River, about 1.5 miles north of down- town Lafayette. Immediately to the north of McAllister is a municipal golf course, which shares the main vehicle entrance to the soccer fields from North Ninth Street. A second means of access to McAllister is via a one -lane unpaved road that runs down a short steep hill, which is used by only a few vehicles. Most of the other land use in the area is industrial. Most of the games played at McAllister are by recreational teams on Saturdays and Sundays, although two fields have been used for traveling -team matches in recent years. The second site is on Lindberg Road, west of the West Lafayette city limits. Some small, but growing, subdivisions are located further west on Lindberg Road, but the overall setting is, for the time being, still rural. These fields, which were used for the first time in the fall of 1997, were developed for travel- ing -team matches. STANDARD INDEPENDENT VARIABLES At the time the Purdue Student Chapter was preparing its data- collec- tion project, ITE's Trip Generation, 5th Edition Update,2 was the most up -to- date reference. Of the 13 suggested inde- pendent variables in the update, only two seemed applicable —(9) Acres and (10) Parking Spaces. The value of using these two variables is discussed below. Acres. McAllister Park is about 60 acres, but most of it is not used for soc- 75 McAllister clime period .04004e j Table 1. Vehicle entries Park Soccer Complex on Enti esat e_ach'dnveway . and exits at Saturday, Oct. 11, 1997. Exits at each,dnveway -' Nc ith South North.' 8:16 a.m. 31 a 0 a 8:21 a.m. 23 a 1 a 8:26 a.m. 17 a 1 a No data collected from 8:31 a.m. to 8:54 a.m. 8:54 a.m. 24 3 11 5 8:59 a.m. 22 3 21 8 9:04 a.m. 21 1 29 5 9:09 a.m. 31 0 6 2 9:14 a.m. 32 3 3 2 9:19 a.m. 29 2 4 0 9:24 a.m. 26 3 20 0 Notes: aSouth driveway was not observed from 8:16 a.m. to 8:31 a.m. On average, 11 of 11 fields were in use for recreational league games. Each team had seven players on the field and approximately three reserve players. Approximately 220 players were present. No public transportation service was available. cer fields. A lot of space is used by vehi- cles parked on the grass next to each of the perimeter soccer fields; other space is left open at McAllister for such activities as flying remote - controlled model air- planes. The effective boundary of the soccer complex is not easy to define, and the 60 -acres value is the result of the author's best estimate. At the Lindberg Complex, the area seeded for playing fields, warm -up and spectators, plus the area covered with crushed stone for park- ing, totals 15 acres. However, as is the case for most land -use types, "acres" should be used as an independent vari- able only if no other variable is available. Parking Spaces. At Lindberg, the crushed -stone lot can hold about 165 vehicles. So far, all of these spaces have not been used at one time, but not all fields have been put into operation. Once this happens, more spaces may be needed. Obviously, this is not a good independent variable to use to develop a trip generation rate. At McAllister, the number of parking spaces is almost impossible to estimate. Any place that is not a playing field in use can become a parking spot. Based on the discussion regarding Lindberg's fmite- capacity lot, estimating McAllister's parking capacity would not be worth the effort. Clearly, new independent variables that help define a usable trip generation rate relationship for youth soccer com- plexes needed to be devised. NEW INDEPENDENT VARIABLES The criteria used by the student - chapter members in proposing any new independent variable were: • It could be defined clearly; • It could be measured with little effort or confusion; and • Its numerical value for a proposed youth soccer complex could be meaningfully estimated. The independent variables considered are discussed below Number of Playing Fields. Just as "Number of Drive -In Windows" for Land Use 912 Drive -In Banks in Trip Generation] needs to be clarified in terms of "number available" vs. "num- ber in use," this value can be easily mis- understood and misused. At McAllister, 14 fields are laid out, but not more than 11 are usually used at one time. At Lindberg, immediate plans for five fields exist; four are laid out, but only three fields were sched- uled for use last fall when data were collected. This variable is easy to count, but its use in predicting what traffic a future soccer complex would generate depends on how "number of fields" is defined. If the eventual number of fields available for use at a proposed site is treated as the "build -out" condi- tion and previous data were collected with X = number of fields in use, then this variable could help establish a rea- sonable upper bound on T. Number of Players. A recent trend in youth soccer is to play "small- sided" matches, in which each team has seven players on the field, instead of the tradi- tional 11. Fewer players means fewer vehicles to drop off and pick up players, unless the number of teams (and matches and fields) is increased to accommodate the player demand. This variable would require the data collector to observe how many players were play- ing on each field. Seven- player matches use smaller fields, so there is room at a site for more such fields. This is another reason to be careful when simply count- ing the number of fields for use as an X variable. At McAllister, the recreational matches had seven players on the field, with about 11 players present. At Lind- berg, the traveling teams had rosters of 15, with 11 players on the field. ISSUES REGARDING DEPENDENT VARIABLES Peaking. In the Trip Generation Update,2 land uses have weekend data for Saturday, Sunday, and Saturday or Sunday "Peak Hour of Generator." Peaking at a youth soccer complex is unlike that at almost any other land use. It may even vary from complex to com- plex. Depending on how tightly the matches are scheduled, players and par- ents for one match may arrive before the 76 ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 • • • Table 2. Vehicle entries and exits at Lindberg Soccer Complex on Saturday, Oct. 11, 1997. 2:35 p.m. 2:40 p.m. 2:50 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 3:10 p.m. 3:20 p.m. 3:30 p.m. 3:40 p.m. 3:50 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:10 p.m. 4:20 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:40 p.m. 4:50 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 5:10 p.m. 5:20 p.m. 5:30 p.m. 5:40 p.m. 5:50 p.m. 6:00 p.m. 3 5 9 7 2 10 4 5 9 2 2 3 0 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 6 27 5 2 6 3 0 4 2 11 34 14 3 5 0 2 5 23 Notes: Only two of four fieldr were in use for these traveling -team games. U14 girls match ended about 4:15 p.m.; U12 boys match ended about 4. :30 p.m. Each team had 11 players on the full and approximately three reserve players. Approxi- mately 56 players were present. 165 parking spaces were available. No public tramportation service was available. 111 JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 players and parents for the previous match have departed. At some com- plexes, start times for matches are stag- gered; at other sites, all matches may be scheduled to start at the same time. The impact on the adjacent street system may depend on how pronounced the peak is within any given hour. The severity of this peak will not be captured by reporting and publishing a value for an hour. The data in Table 1 for 5- minute intervals at McAllister indicate a fairly steady entry flow over the time observed but show a sharp peak in the exiting traffic for 10 minutes. At Lind- berg, sharp peaks were observed shortly after a match ended (Table 2). It may be a good idea to record driveway counts at youth soccer complexes in intervals of at most 10 minutes. Recreational match or traveling? Most of the author's child's traveling -team matches are more than one hour's drive from Lafayette. Many of the team parents own vans. As a result, much ridesharing is done to out -of -town matches. For home matches, very little ridesharing takes place. It is possible that the vehicle trip generation rate for visiting teams at travel matches may be only half as high as for the local teams. If this proves to be a sig- nificant phenomenon, a separate land -use category could be established. At this point, however, a simple note as to the number of fields in use by travel teams should be part of the data report. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the erratic temporal distribution of trip ends at youth soccer complexes. Because of this, the daily (or even hourly) trip rates found in Trip Generation may not be the best repre- sentation of the site's impact on the adja- cent street system. It is essential to have a clear concept of why the rate is being cal- culated. For example, if the driveway(s) or road(s) to /from a proposed soccer com- plex may require traffic signals, the trip generation rates must be calculated in a way that is compatible with the method used to conduct a signal- warrant analysis. In Table 3, some trip rates are calcu- lated from the data in Tables 1 and 2. In Table 1, the peak 10 minutes of the gen- erator occurred between 8:59 and 9:09 a.m. Between 8:54 and 9:29 a.m. (a period 35/60 -hour long), 316 entries and exits were observed. At Lindberg (Table 2), 226 entries and exits took place between 2:35 and 6:05 p.m. (3.5 hours). The generator's peak 10- minute period was from 2:50 to 3 p.m. The value of the "Players Present" variable was calculated for McAllister as follows: 11 fields x 11 roster players /team X 2 teams /field = 242 players. For Lindberg, the corresponding calculation is 3 X 15 X 2 = 90 players. The rates in Table 3 do not follow the typical calculations in Trip Generation because of the unusual traffic patterns associated with this land use. With a more substantial database, it may be possible to calculate 10- minute and one -hour rates that can be applied to traffic- signal -war- rant analysis and other uses. SUMMARY Based on observations made at only two complexes, it is not wise to draw solid conclusions. In collecting data at the two sites, the counting of vehicles was the easiest part of the project. There are typically few entrances to a youth soccer complex, even if the parking is as unstructured as at the McAllister site. The difficulty in devising a useful rela- tionship between vehicle trips and inde- pendent variables at a soccer complex is deciding upon appropriate independent variables. If this land use is ever included in a future edition of Trip Generation, it may need to be treated as a special case. Data for the Tvariable may have to be collected in time intervals much shorter than one hour, and the Xvariables may have to be defined carefully by both ITE and the data contributors. Clearly, more data collection at youth soccer complexes must take place before some of these issues can be resolved. In the meantime, the author would appre- ciate the comments and suggestions of anyone who has thoughts on the subject. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The data for this project were col- lected by the author and Ben Good, Darren Jorgenson and Gary Shoup, members of the Purdue Student Chapter 77 Table 3. Sample IndependentVaniable Acres rate calculations Time 'Tani Period Peak 10 minutes for two youth soccer McAllister • 110/60 = 1.83 complexes. Lindberg 36/15 = 2.40 Acres Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/60 = 9.03 (226/3.5)/15 = 4.30 Parking Spaces Peak 10 minutes Number of parking spaces hard to determine 36/165 = 0.22 Parking Spaces Observed data converted to average hourly rate (226/3.5)/165 = 0.39 Playing Fields in Use Peak 10 minutes 110 /11 = 10.0 36/3 = 12.0 Playing Fields in Use Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/11 = 49.25 (226/3.5)/3 = 21.52 Players Present Peak 10 minutes 110/242 = 0.45 36/90 = 0.40 Players Present Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/242 = 2.24 (226/3.5)/90 = 0.72 of ITE, who, along with other student - chapter members, took part in "brain- storming" about some of the issues discussed in this feature. The suggestions made by the reviewers of the manuscript also were very helpful. • References 1. ITE. Trip Generation, 6th Edition. Wash- ington, D.C., USA, 1997. 2. ITE. Trip Generation, February 1995, 5th Edition Update. Washington, D.C., USA, 1995. JON D. FRICKER, Ph.D., PE, has been on the civil engineering fac- ulty at Purdue Univer- sity since 1980. For almost as long Fricker has coached refereed and watched youth soc- cer. Until his four -year -old daughter starts playing soccer, he has some time to do vehicle counts at soc- cer matches. Fricker is a Member ofITE 78 ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 • • TO: Public Works Department, Engineering Memorandum Dave McPherson Brandon Miles FROM: Cyndy Knighton DATE: March 5, 2009 RE: Starfire Softball -to- Soccer Field Conversion Last year, Starfire submitted an application to convert the four existing softball fields into 4 soccer fields. This conversion is not part of the original development agreement which capped their mitigation costs. The first question at hand is whether this conversion is subject to the city's current concurrency test as well as possible payment of impact fees; Starfire has presented arguments that this conversion will actually generate less pm peak hour trips and is therefore not subject to the concurrency test and has no net new trips, meaning no impact fees are due. Multiple parking reports and studies have been submitted with the final piece sent in by their traffic engineer, Ken Oswell of Parsons Brinckerhoff. His letter dated February 12, 2009, shows a net reduction in pm peak hour trips. The letter references the November 2003 Parking Management Plan, which I have reviewed along with the updated Parking Management Plan. There are some significant discrepancies in the parking management plans, which was raised in an email to Brandon on December 10, 2008, and in my interpretation it appeared that there could be an additional 67 net new pm peak hour trips associated with this conversion. When Starfire first acquired the rights to use this parkland it was a recently acquired County park. The intent was to beef up the existing soccer fields, build a new soccer building with adjunct facilities, and convert the cricket fields to soccer fields. The four softball fields were to remain in place. Booking of the facilities was to become a Starfire responsibility with some city oversight and some percentage of the field times were to be reserved for "regular" non - soccer league use so that past patrons of the facility, as it existed then, could still use the park. In the February letter from Ken Oswell, a trip generation rate of 13.3 trips /field (in use) is presented. There is no documentation or justification provided for the trip generation rate used in this letter. Without justification, there is no reason for Tukwila to accept the trip generation presented and therefore trip generation rates revert to the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Using ITE, the pm peak hour trip rate for a county park is 0.06 trips /acre. This translates into an overall trip generation rate of 3 trips for the entire 51.46 acre Fort Dent Park. The portion of the park associated just with the softball fields is approximately 28% of the site, which would then have about 1 pm peak hour trip associated with it using the ITE trip generation rate. Using the ITE amount as the baseline, the net new p.m. peak hour trips associated with the proposed field conversion is 39 trips. This then clearly shows that this proposed conversion requires a concurrency test and payment of traffic impact fees. The concurrency test fee is $2,500 (all other uses, greater than 300,000 GFA) and the impact fee is $52,953.17 (39 trips x $1357.77 per trip). c: \temp\xpgrpwise\starfire softball -to- soccer field conversion 3- 5- 09.doc EXPIRES 07- l8- ZDI a 1 February 12, 2009 Mr. Brandon Miles Senior Planner City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 9818 -8548 RE: Starfire Sports Center Proposed Improvements Dear Brandon: DEttELc d� F As requested by the City, we have prepared this letter to summarize and confirm the PM peak hour trip generation estimated on an average day for the existing (previous) and proposed operation of the Starfire Sports Center located at Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Table 1 shows the estimated trips on an average weekday for the existing facilities. Table 2 shows the estimated trips on an average weekday for the proposed facilities. Table 1 — Previous PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario A nY�P' Soccer Facilities in use ! 9 of 10) Fields iR ` 77 a».k'I 61 33 94 Softball Facilities in use 3 (of 4) Fields 36 4 40 Su..ort Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Notes: (a) From November 2003 Parking Management Plan. Table 2 — Proposed PM Peak Hour Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario �'lwa*m•! Soccer Facilities in use & R 12 of 14 a' Fields iR ` 77 a».k'I A ! 8 44 121 Su..ort Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 The details of the proposed changes in facilities and operation of the Center are contained in the Updated Parking Management Plan (December 2008) previously submitted to the City. Please let me know if anything else is needed. Sincerely, PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Kenneth Oswell, PE Project Manager KOO:koo Over a Century of Engineering Excellence Public Works Department, Engineering Memorandum TO: Dave McPherson Brandon Miles FROM: Cyndy Knighton DATE: March 5, 2009 Updated March 24, 2009 RE: Starfire Softball -to- Soccer Field Conversion Last year, Starfire submitted an application to convert the four existing softball fields into 4 soccer fields. This conversion is not part of the original development agreement which capped their mitigation costs. The first question at hand is whether this conversion is subject to the city's current concurrency test as well as possible payment of impact fees. In June 2007, the determination was made by Jim Morrow that this project was subject to the current ordinances and this was reflected in the SEPA checklist. Starfire has presented arguments that this conversion will actually generate less pm peak hour trips and is therefore not subject to the concurrency test and has no net new trips, meaning no impact fees are due. When Starfire first acquired the rights to use this parkland it was a recently acquired County park. The intent was to beef up the existing soccer fields, build a new soccer building with adjunct facilities, and convert the cricket fields to soccer fields. The four softball fields were to remain in place. Booking of the facilities was to become a Starfire responsibility with some city oversight and some percentage of the field times were to be reserved for "regular" non - soccer league use so that past patrons of the facility, as it existed then, could still use the park. A traffic study was submitted in or around April 2003 which analyzed the "worst case" scenario of soccer tournaments occurring at the same time as softball tournaments. An estimate for trip generation for the softball fields was included in this report for this scenario but only soccer trip generation estimates were backed up by outside sources. Multiple parking reports and studies have since been submitted with the final update to the Parming Management Plan being dated December 16, 2008. An additional summary letter by Starfire's traffic engineer, Ken Oswell of Parsons Brinckerhoff, dated February 12, 2009, was also submitted. Last week, Mr. Oswell emailed me a table titled "A -3 Previous Starfire Sports Complex PM Peak Hour Trip Generation — Average Day." This table is for retroactively calculating typical trip generation for the original proposal from 2004. The information presented in this table did not exist in 2003. The letter from February 12, 2009, shows a net reduction in pm peak hour trips. The letter references the November 2003 Parking Management Plan, which I have reviewed along with the updated Parking Management Plan. The February letter presents a trip generation rate of 13.3 trips /field (in use) for the softball fields. There is no documentation or justification provided for the trip generation rate used in this letter. From a conversation with Mr. Oswell, I was informed that the trip generation c: \temp\xpgrpwise \starfire softball -to- soccer field conversion 3- 5- 09.doc rate was based solely on the assumptions listed on the bottom of table A -3 (for the retroactive /previous trip generation table recently presented to me). Without additional justification for the trip generation rate proposed, or actual counts from similar facilities, there is no reason for Tukwila to accept the proposed trip generation. Therefore trip generation rates revert to the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Using ITE, the pm peak hour trip rate for a regional park (which is what the original traffic report used to describe the existing conditions of the old Fort Dent Park) is 0.2 trips /acre. This translates into an overall trip generation rate of 10 trips for the entire 51.46 acre Fort Dent Park. The portion of the park associated just with the softball fields is approximately 28% of the site, which would then have about 3 pm peak hour trips associated with it using the ITE trip generation rate. Using the ITE amount as the baseline, the net new p.m. peak hour trips associated with the proposed field conversion is 24 (27 total new "soccer" trips — 3 "existing regional park" trips). This then clearly shows that this proposed conversion requires a concurrency test and payment of traffic impact fees. The concurrency test fee is $2,500 (all other uses, greater than 300,000 GFA) and the impact fee is $32,586.48 (24 trips x $1357.77 per trip). c: \temp\xpgrpwise \starfire softball -to- soccer field conversion 3- 5- 09.doc • TO: Nora Gierloff, Deputy Director Minnie Dhaliwal, Planning Supervisor FROM: Brandon Miles, Senior Planner DATE: March 6, 2009 RE: Starfire Traffic Generation In preparation for our internal meeting on Tuesday and our meeting with PW on Wednesday I have put the following information together: 1. Memo dated March 5, 2009 from Cyndy Knighton regarding traffic mitigation fees for Starfire. 2. Letter from Kenneth Oswell with Parsons Brinckerhoff provide a summary of the delta in parking on the site. 3. Parking Management Plan dated December 16, 2008. The plan includes a detailed review of trip generation. 4. The original Traffic and Parking Analysis prepared by Entraco dated April 29, 2003 Items 3 and 4 were prepared by the same person so he has experience with the project from day one. In my previous conversations with PW they had noted the difficulties in determining the trips for the proposed use, hence the reason for a trip generation report. • • -r - - - .•-'s 1 1 83ti• 659 8535 Trip Generafion.Analysis Twin Creeks Soccer Fields • OpTrans. . 6- Mar -Do• . Summary of Activities Tabie.l • P-07 ATTACHMENT' �� • Page_ of•, rr of Proposed soccer fields R of Months per year 12 Players per team 12 Spectators per team • Umpires per game • 2 Games per field per night 2-4 Length or games 75 minutes Game Times (Weekday) 5:30 to 8 :30 PM Game-Times (Weekend) 8:00 AM to 8:30 PM Player and Spectator Arrivals 15 minutes prior to game time Peak Commute Times 4:00 b 600 PM # of Games Generating Peak Hour Trips. 4 (1 per field) Assumed Auto Occupancy 1.5 imate of rips Genera ed Persons Arriving in Peak Hour Persons Leaving In Peek Hour Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation r' LOCATION :1 831 659 8536 2 -games 4-games. 64 .:128 •.7 14 • (Drop -offs etc,) 47 95 (Vehicles per hour) DV TTMG f4."1n .,.., ..._.. • STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR STARFIRE SPORTS 'OF IC 0, 0 2008 PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 December 16, 2008 Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Table of Contents Title Introduction Page Project Description 1 Analysis Scenarios 2 Project Traffic Project Vehicle trips for Transportation Concurrency 3 Project Traffic Distribution 4 Parking Analysis Parking Supply 4 Parking Demand 5 Parking Plan Summary Average Day Scenario 6 Local Soccer Tournament Scenario 6 Capacity Stadium Event Scenario 8 List of Tables Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios 2 Table 2 — Trip Generation for Tournament Scenarios 4 Table 3 — Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario 4 Table 4 — Worst -Case Parking Demand - Local Tournament 5 And Average Day Scenarios. Table 5 — Starfire Sports Complex Parking Demand Analysis 7 List of Appendices Appendix A — Proposed Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Appendix B — Starfire Sports Complex Managed Parking Policy Appendix C — (For Reference Only) Previous Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation - November 2003 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX • UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Project Description This report documents the trip generation, trip distribution, and potential traffic impacts for the proposed changes to the Starfire Sports Complex currently operating within Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Fort Dent Park is located just north of Fort Dent Way, between the Green River and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe railroad tracks. The City has taken ownership of the park from King County. Starfire Sports is a Washington State Not - for - Profit Corporation holding a 40 -year concession agreement with the City to construct and operate concessions in Fort Dent Park. Facilities that Starfire has operated within the park for the past four years include four unlit soccer fields, four lighted soccer fields, four lighted softball diamonds, and one building with two indoor soccer fields and ancillary spaces. One lighted soccer field has permanent stadium bleacher seating for about 2,700 spectators. The Starfire Sports Complex is proposing to modify their facilities by converting the four softball diamonds to four soccer fields. Some of the new soccer facilities will be used during the day as practice fields by the new Seattle Sounders FC Major League Soccer club. The proposed plan for the Complex is to re -grade the area of the softball diamonds to allow four more soccer fields • (one unlit grass field and three lighted artificial turf fields) to be constructed to provide additional fields for all users of the Complex and suitable practice facilities for the Sounders. This plan also proposes construction of 40 new parking spaces on the site, as shown in the attached site plan. • The result of the proposed changes for the Complex will be a reduction in peak traffic and parking demand due to the conversion of the softball fields to soccer fields that have lower trip generation rates and more favorable peaking characteristics. In addition, two of the new turf soccer fields will be smaller fields designed for U -11 play and teams will have 11 players on average, rather than 14, further reducing trip generation. It is expected that the Sounders will generate only about 50 daily weekday trips and none in the p.m. peak hour (compared to 90 in the p.m. peak hour alone for the softball fields as shown later in Table 2). The most likely time of use for the practice facilities is weekdays from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. which is the period of lightest use for the Complex on an average weekday. The new soccer fields will also be available throughout the remainder of the day and weekends for other users as shown later in Table 2. As noted above, the parking count on the site will also increase by 40, from 450 to 490 spaces. The Parking Plan described in this document is based on the successful operation of the Strarfire Sports Complex to date. The Complex has now managed parking for four years of daily operations, nearly 35 major tournaments and several capacity stadium events with no parking 1 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN problems and no complaints from adjacent businesses. This experience has been incorporated into a very effective Managed Parking Policy that is included in Appendix B. The reduction in traffic and parking demand anticipated with the proposed changes should only make this policy that much more effective in the future. Analysis Scenarios The analyses for this study were based on the three different scenarios discussed below and summarized in Table 1. The Average Day scenario has the fewest fields in use with typically only one team practicing per field. Because this is by far the most usual operating condition, this scenario was used before the Complex initially opened to determine the number of net new trips that could impact the City's concurrency mitigation projects. The November 2003 Parking Management Plan (PMP) analyzed a Combined Tournaments (Softball and Soccer) Scenario. This scenario was used as the basis for the level of service (LOS) calculations for transportation concurrency before the Complex initially opened, with LOS being calculated for both 2003 and 2010 traffic volumes. With the conversion of softball fields to soccer fields, this scenario has been renamed the Local Soccer Tournament scenario for this document. The Local Soccer Tournament scenario has a large, local, 3 -day soccer tournament running over a weekend with up to 11 of the proposed 12 outdoor soccer fields and both indoor fields in use. This represents a worst case scenario as it is Starfire policy to close the indoor fields for all activity during tournaments. These tournaments have higher traffic demand then regional or national soccer tournaments where teams tend to arrive in larger vehicles with more participants per vehicle. The Capacity Stadium Event scenario assumes an event that fills the existing stadium bleacher seats. This scenario has been updated from 1,800 seats in the initial Parking Management Plan to 2,700 seats in this document. While such events are infrequent, this scenario (together with a modified Average Day scenario described later) is used to evaluate the peak parking demand for the Starfire facility. Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios ce�$,YS .a, ,,}}n��ario ti . �, ti * Approximate "� ` Frequency h,:.. % r (Days per Year).. Used For, Average Day 344 Determination of net new trips Local Soccer Tournament (formerly called Combined Tournaments) 21 Concurrency level of service Capacity Stadium Event 2 Peak parking demand (in conjunction with a modified Average Day Scenario) 2 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN • PROJECT TRAFFIC Project Vehicle Trips For Transportation Concurrency Tables A -1, A -2 and A -3 in Appendix A summarize the maximum seasonal usage and the p.m. peak hour vehicle trip generation for all proposed Starfire Sports Complex activities except capacity stadium events. Previous Tables A -1 and A -2 from the November 2003 PMP have been included for reference in Appendix C. Please note that previous Table A -1 (page 1 of 3) has been corrected for the ratio of lighted to unlighted soccer fields in the Complex. This ratio was estimated in November 2003 during planning for the Complex at 7:1, but the actual ratio after 4 years of operation is 4:4. However, this correction does not impact the worst case scenario which was the only data in the table that was used in previous analyses. The information in Table A -1 includes an estimate of the number of players on each field in the p.m. peak hour during local soccer tournaments. The number of players is then multiplied by a factor to determine the additional number of spectators, and then by the number of fields in use to estimate the total number of people attending the Starfire Sports Complex during the p.m. peak hour. For the analysis, it was assumed that all seven of the turf fields would be available for play year around, and four of the five grass fields would be in shape for play at any given time from April through October. The factor for spectators has been modified since the Initial Traffic Impact Analysis (February 2003) from 0.50 to 0.35 for youth soccer based on trip generation data for the Twin Creeks Soccer Fields in Sunnyvale, California. After calculating the total number of people attending the Complex, the numbers of entering and exiting vehicle trips were calculated based on assumptions for average car occupancy (ACO) and participant arrivals. Also added to the trip generation are the trips in Table A -2 associated with support facilities (e.g. exercise area, offices, food court) housed in the indoor soccer building. These trips were estimated based on Land Use Code 495 (Recreational Community Center) from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Based on current procedures, the proposed daily operation for the soccer fields will have eight to twelve fields available for use at different times of year, most with only one team, no officials, and few if any spectators beyond the coach(es). The information in Table A -3 has been added to the PMP to estimate the number of entering and exiting vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour on an average day. The number of daily vehicle trips was estimated for various times of year using the same methodology outlined above for large tournaments but with assumptions based on actual daily operations. A weighted average was then calculated to obtain p.m. peak hour vehicle trips for an average day on an annual basis. Table 2 lists all of the activities and vehicle trip generation included in the study under the Local Soccer Tournament scenario. This includes the highest trips from Tables A -1 and A -2. It should be noted that the total estimated number of peak hour trips (in and out) will be reduced by 6 percent from 371 to 348 by the proposed conversion of softball fields into additional soccer fields. The level of service analyses with project trips detailed in the prior Traffic and Parking Analysis Report (April 2003) were based on 377 peak hour trips. 3 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 2 — Trip Generation for Tournament Scenarios Facility ;`''r. `Size %Are• •'Units - PM In (vph). PM Out'(vph) .'PM Totak.- Combined Tournaments (a) 12 Fields 77 44 144 Support Facilities 21 Soccer Fields 10 Fields 181 • -Proposed Trip Totals:_. 63 244 Softball Fields 4 Fields 82 8 90 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Previous Trip .Totals (a)c • ' 276 `• 95 .. 3 71 Local Soccer Tournament (b) Soccer Fields 13 Fields 230 81 311 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Proposed .Trip Totals (b): .: ; ... . 243 105 ' .. ' . -348 Notes: (a) From November 2003 Parking Management Plan; (b) Based on proposed field conversions. Table 3 lists all of the activities and vehicle trip generation included in the study under the Average Day scenario. This includes the highest trips from Table A -2 and the weighted average of trips from Table A -3. Table 3 — Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario Facility , - Size /Area : : Units . PM In; (vpli) ' g PM Out'(vph) . PM Totals. Soccer Fields 12 Fields 77 44 144 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 • -Proposed Trip Totals:_. 90 68 158 Project Traffic Distribution Project traffic for the Starfire Sports Complex was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based on an assumed uniform distribution of clientele for the Complex throughout the Greater Seattle area. This distribution included 15% and 25% coming from the north and south, respectively, via 1 -5 (ramping to 1 -405); 15% and 5% coming from the north and south, respectively, via Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway; 5% coming from the west via SR 518/1 -405; and 35% coming from the east via 1 -405. PARKING ANALYSIS Parking Supply Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. Starfire Sports has also obtained a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant to use up to 461 existing paved and striped parking spaces on commercial properties immediately adjacent to the southern edge of Fort Dent Park. The proposed project will add 40 new parking spaces near the newly converted soccer fields. This would provide a total of 951 spaces on or adjacent to the project site, as shown in Table 5. In addition, the Complex has access to several hundred parking spaces through informal arrangements with buildings on Interurban Avenue to provide parking for very large stadium events. 4 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN • Parking Demand • The peak period parking demand for the Local Soccer Tournament and Average Day scenarios are based on the maximum difference between entering and exiting traffic shown in Table A -1, A -2 and A -3, and three other factors. One factor is that the cycle time on most of the fields is between one and two hours, so the maximum parking needed could be twice the hourly need. The second factor is that there will be some residual parking needed after each game or practice to accommodate things such as team meetings, coaches' talks, and participants and fans that might stay for some or all of a following game or practice. The third factor is spaces would be needed for game officials and /or staff. Resulting parking requirements based on these factors are shown in Table 4. These requirements represent worst -case conditions because the analysis assumes games and practices start simultaneously on all outdoor fields. Start times can actually be staggered in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand, resulting in a larger surplus of on -site parking for these scenarios. Table 4 - Worst -Case Parking Demand -Local Soccer Tournament and Average Day Scenarios Facility :.' .y . a Local Soccer Tonrna'ineiit, : ,Average Day.: Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -1) 190 -- Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -2) -11 -II Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -3) -- 53 Combined Delta 179 42 Factor 1: Cycle Time (Assumes non - staggered start times) 179 42 Factor 2: Residual Parking 90 21 Factor 3: Referee and/or staff parking 50 15 (a) Proposed Parking Totals - 498 .> ; 120 (a) Staff only - no referees. It is anticipated that the highest single demand for parking will occur with the Capacity Stadium Event scenario. The initial Parking Management Plan (November 2003) considered parking requirements for 1,800 seats. Over the first four years of operation, the Complex has added 900 bleacher seats for a total of 2,700, and has had events with up to 3,000 attendees with no parking difficulties. In the past, capacity events have been exclusively professional soccer games. With the new Seattle Sounders FC playing at Qwest field, the likelihood of events this size at the Starfire Complex could be reduced to only a couple times a year, if at all, for events like exhibition games or graduations. A capacity event could require as many as 1,080 parking spaces. In addition, it was assumed that there would be some parking demand created by other daily activities at the Complex. However, recognizing the substantial parking demands for a Capacity Stadium Event, it was assumed, as per the Starfire Managed Parking Policy attached as Appendix B to this document, that other Complex facilities would be managed to 5 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN reduce the Average Day parking demand by 50% to 60 spaces during special events. The resulting total parking demand during a Large Stadium Event would be 1,140 spaces, which is about 200 cars over the 951 total committed parking spaces available on and adjacent to the project site. For these rare capacity events, Starfire has additional procedures described below to ensure adequate parking. Table 5 compares the parking demand estimates for the Local Soccer Tournament, Average Day and Capacity Stadium Event scenarios with the available parking supply. PARKING PLAN SUMMARY Average Day Scenario The 490 parking spaces proposed at Fort Dent Park should easily accommodate the estimated Average Day scenario peak parking demand of 120 spaces for the day -to -day Starfire Sports Complex activities. No special parking procedures are anticipated. Local Soccer Tournament Scenario Large, local soccer tournaments could require some additional parking or proactive parking management in order to accommodate the estimated parking demand for 498 spaces. Procedures already in place to accomplish this include: • Starfire staggers game starts during tournaments by 30 minutes; approximately 50% of the fields will commence on the hour and the remainder on the half hour. With participants typically arriving 30 minutes prior to scheduled game times this will result in significantly reduced parking demand with an approximately equal number of attendees departing and arriving concurrently. • Starfire Sports limits maximum tournament capacity so as not to exceed the available parking resources. Any team registrations that exceed the maximum tournament capacity are not accepted. • Starfire Sports issues an email notification to all registered participants a minimum of two times prior to each tournament. These notifications provide teams with information and options with regard to available parking resources. • Starfire Sports uses preferential carpool parking and /or paid parking to keep the parking demand for this scenario in line with the available on -site parking. Starfire Sports has also secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 461 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park if needed for this scenario. • Any off -site parkers would utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain safe and convenient access to the site. 6 December 16, 2008 • • .STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 5 7 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Capacity Stadium Event Scenario Starfire Sports has secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 461 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park. These spaces would be available evenings and weekends to supplement the 490 existing spaces at the Complex, for a total of up to 951 available spaces. Capacity events in the existing 2,700 -seat stadium will be rare with the potential for professional soccer games no longer available, but if they occur they could require up to 1,140 parking spaces. This means that there may be an occasional need for additional off - site parking for up to 200 cars, or additional measures to reduce the parking demand by about 200 cars. The following are measures Starfire has typically used to ensure the availability of adequate parking for capacity stadium events. These procedures, included in Appendix B, have already proven to be effective for stadium events with up to 3,000 in attendance: • During stadium events Starfire Sports ensures that some or all of the surrounding fields are closed if required so as not to exceed available parking resources. • Off site parkers utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the covenanted commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain access to the site. • Starfire Sports has established procedures to encourage spectators for stadium events to carpool or use other modes of transportation to minimize parking demand. These procedures have included fees for parking, and clear communication of the parking situation and options in all participant applications, tickets and flyers for large events • Starfire Sports provides traffic control workers and parking attendants as needed to accommodate the ingress and egress of traffic to the Complex parking and adjacent covenanted parking for large stadium events. • Starfire Sports contacts the Tukwila Police Department ( "TPD ") at least one month prior to each special event to request assistance with traffic management at the Fort Dent Way / Interurban Avenue intersection. In the event that the TPD is unable to fulfill the request, Starfire Sports subsequently makes the same request to the King County Sheriff's Department. • Starfire Sports has informal arrangements with several commercial properties located along Interurban Avenue that have provided additional off -site parking spaces for past events. Starfire could also provide a courtesy shuttle between these locations and the Complex. • Starfire Sports partners with hotels prior to each tournament to arrange for complimentary shuttle service to and from the complex for visiting teams. Several hotels are also within walking distance of the Complex utilizing existing and proposed trail facilities. 8 December 16, 2008 • • PREVIOUS' DELTA (g) or (-) 0 o . co I- 01 0) K T, Ir M to O CO e- l- i- r AVAIL) ADJA( SPACE CO CO AVAILABLE ON -SITE SPACES (a) 0 0 0) 0) 0 as o co o 0 PARK DEM) (Vehic a- v CO 01 o co r r r ANALYSIS SCENARIO DESCRIPTION Average Day Parking Local Soccer Tournament Parking (d) Capacity Stadium Event Parking: Stadium Parking (e) Managed Average Day Parking (f) Capacity Stadium Event Parking Total: z 0 D.Z r N M Z O U W F- O z p n E O 0 CD 0 C U Cn C O O `) f° (n 0) a)o o. .' N -01 a C N 0) O C) O` U v- 0_ w. C U C o U a U 17 >• o C0 C O N • CY al Co CO c ""' c o U) .e O to p.- CLO omW 0.o CO : c � p oo c EQ T n c • U >. H O C N C o C 3 U a) U O p°2 Cf) a U ~ Cp 0 UC n C o O(0 E y `e0 ac Co cp »., o)co o E2 � �Y � as y ac) o a y p o. o .0 C 'o N C1 c > = (0 Co p n>.NV Es° C U . C o N s) O p O C p o -0 CT w, p -p (0 E 6: ( .• ....CD cu CO C y Co -o p pv EE�c 0) co p j N 'y C C0 C0 0_ CV -p C6 N Y d r w, 0 (1) C/) (0 0) 0 c y c 3 0 . �1 w Q 3 N (0 Co N m 2 u) ? Q 0) O E' c 3 20 o _ c 0 • c;..) ` 2 3 y O L 0) ao CA O 0) n--''C V O > ) E Co CO a d N CU 2 N C'' a) p 2 8 (0 (0 E °) '� °) Z p p 3 E Co E (C 'O 3 o. 3 E s).N p p N 0) U) p Ch t- I- I- U) V) Q Q LL 600000) ACA U CO 7 C: \Temp\XPgrpwise\3 UPDATED Table 5 (insert page 7) - Parking Plan 12 -16 -08 Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Appendix A Proposed Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation • C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\5 FINAL Table A -1 12 -16 -08 Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour O r) '- N as O Ce') r ° h ° ° ° 41 ° ° N ° ° Oe7 r ° h 0.35 Spectators / Player at games 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals I'..,.:...: 'Worst case for weekday PM Peak Total Vehicle Trip Generation 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 5% Walk / Bike 10% Walk / Bike 0% Bus 5% Bus 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour N 0) VI I, N0) CO) ' "1N °0) cc) ' 41 N° 00) (O') 0) 244 I N° 00) CO ) 0) 244 I Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) as CO 10 f0 10 )� e 1.47 1 Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour N 0) CO ° Cs N 00) CO ° 153 ] N 0 0) CO ° Cl ° 00) CO CO 244 N 0 00) CO) 0) 244 I a) W d C a G. Oa I- < mu, ) LOO mLO 1 302 O 1 0CD,On0 302 �Om� N I 422 3O� u,N 422 I ra o 11')3 �=O 'iYe w>a ET_ °ems a �M !� O °e a e° 224 O °e a ° ,_e° 224 o °em e° e0) 320 O ° tD e° rn 320 I O C G G a 9 y Z ji NL-• a) Z D a N N N e F' N In N O a) N o In N O 0) N 0 1n N e" N o )n N e co o- t En CL 0 0 0 •aTONNm m ON 0 0 N N - 0 488 0 aD 0 NNNo O 556 0 0) 0 0 NNN— N 736 0 a7 ° N 0 NN ^�N� TABLE PM PEAK HOU r Fields Trip Gel N N 2 a Am' 03 C7 m a t0 °e)n N a7OF_eO N 0) aD °e0 N c0 OCe N n t0 mv0O 80 1 `o v, `a) a d LL Z N to N ■n : c. N )n N U) N N 0 N N N N 0 N CO N N N N fn Hours of Use 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm •0 0 .(3 a) a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields U -11 Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields U -11 Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Nov - Jan TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields U -11 Feb-Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Feb -Mar TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Synthetic Fields U -11 Apr - May Grass Fields . Adult Apr - May TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields U -11 Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Aug TOTAL C:\Temp\XPgrpwise\5 FINAL Table A -1 12 -16 -08 TABLE A -2 Community Center P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreationa O H O c c d t0 N_ L. Fri a c J ti M N N M r rn 0 1000 SF GFA (V Recreational Community Center Total new trips a C �v = N 0 i▪ s ea xi N V .0 ` ✓ N • c c c as CU N d N N cp c ▪ Cd � O • N c � O • O v Q c t c • 3 O c c Q U O 2 0 >. a C) cg) E • E c .N . 0 E o w O I of • d ▪ d N O E F-1 O • 0 LL T w d • l2 � c . c f� O ` E O U To -0 O • R co V m V - • c P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park CD 0 N_ N < U ~ J (O CD (0 I, O CV 0 O rn O 0 N N U LSI Regional Park Total new trips ai 0 0 U a) D c c -J • a) rn 0 v W r m 0 c m c 0 0 c a) a y a) a) 0) c W c 0 0 O n c C 1- O a) y N a) C Z • v • a c m 0 0 41 c c m a 1- W F_ d r E 0 c a) d (v w `0 n U tl) a) a) N c c N J a) 0) N C: \Temp\XPgrpwise \6 UPDATED Table A -2 12 -16 -08 Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour r cpO) D) N 0) Cu m N m O a0 O N 0 O N c0 O m M r O O N c0 0 t9 v r CO O Cu m O c9 Q 0.10 Spectators / Player at games 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals 1 "' I Worst case for weekday PM Peak Total Vehicle Trip Generation 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 5% Walk / Bike 10% Walk / Bike 0% Bus 5% Bus 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 70% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour m N Co) ^ N N i I 55 1 ` O m N ^ O D7 N O cp ^ O O) N Q c0 Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACOI m c o r p co V co < Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour .^-M co) OND .�- ccc))�O H .�- o Col �O 1 SON "g m - OM "g Obi oo c If a 0 c5 2I N °32= a �Q N r p W. N'R N N V O NcD N L- 108 N N V O N (0 N N O r V V) N rN N 0 r a N N rN R 168 f 2 d o w 1:: g R t2 AC w m a CL NLI) NO per) 0 O(NO NONNC')) 148 NONN Co) 148 En 0 d C 1 n• Y m 15 Z LL m d a N h N Co) � N [t N O CO N 0 R N O -• N O M N M N O M N CI v `m o a CL j� Q x w0_ O Or c7 cp d 0 244 CO o O N �. O 342 c0 N Q V CO O 432 cOp CO W CD n a •N N U3 TABLE OMPLEX PM PE r Fields Trip Gel `m a U 8 C b E CL ON r a N r ON O CO CO C' ,_ OV V 4OO 80 `o N y .0 7 it 2 N cp N N `;'.„ N cO N in N N N N(0 N N cc) N cO N N M N it) Hours of Use 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm O O 'C co a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday ' Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields U -11 Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct 'TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields U -11 Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Nov - Jan 'TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields U -11 Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Feb -Mar 'TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Synthetic Fields U -11 Apr - May Grass Fields Adult Apr - May 'TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields U -11 Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Aug 'TOTAL _— I Starfire Sports Complex ed Parking Management Plan Appendix B Starfire Sports Complex Managed Parking Policy • • • Igifl/e Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Re+iision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: MANAGED PARKING POLICY Purpose: The policy exists to ensure that program activity does not exceed available parking resources or impact neighboring businesses or streets. Applies to: All Starfire Managers Applies When: Managed parking will be in effect in the event that planned program activity will require or exceed all of the onsite parking capacity. Available Parking Resources: Onsite: Approximately 450 paved and striped spaces located within. the Starfire Sports and Entertainment Complex ( "the Complex"). Offsite: Approximately 461 paved and striped spaces in the commercial properties owned by John C. Radovich ( "JCR ") located immediately adjacent to the complex. Starfire maintains a standing agreement with JCR for the utilization of these spaces. Additional parking in the commercial properties situated along Interurban Avenue. A courtesy shuttle will be secured by Starfire to transport attendees between these Interurban • parking locations and the complex. Fees: Parking fees will be assessed on a per vehicle basis any time that managed parking is in effect. There will be two levels of parking fees imposed: daily parking &weekend parking. Exemptions: The following people are exempt from paying the parking fee upon entering the park during Starfire events: y Current Starfire Sports members, correctly displaying a valid parking pass on the front windshield of their vehicle; and .:. . ➢ City of Tukwila Residents who present a valid Drivers' License showing Tukwila residency. Team Structure: The core parking team includes: 1 Parking Manager, 3-4 Site Supervisors, 6 -8 team members. Large scale events requiring 12 or more team members will be bolstered by volunteers from clubs, teams and organization who have applied to fulfill the role as a fundraising opportunity: Parking .a Manager Page 1 of 3 'Site; upeniisors (x 3 -4) earn :Fundraising embers Group x 6 -8) J (as needed) - 1 - • SPORTS Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Revision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: Parking Demand: Program activity levels at Starfire fall into 3 distinct categories with regard to attendance and associated parking demand: 1. Regular day to day program activity including field rentals, leagues, training, and after school programs: onsite parking will adequately accommodate this type of activity. The lack of spectators and pick up / drop off nature of vehicular traffic ensures that the onsite parking resource will not be exceeded. Managed parking not required. 2. Weekend Tournaments (typically 2 — 3 days in duration): Tournaments may be local, regional or national. Regional and national tournament teams tend to arrive in fewer and larger vehicles with more participants per vehicle. Managed parking may be required. 3. Special Events: Special events typically utilize the Starfire Sports stadium. If bleacher seating for the event is forecast to be at or near capacity managed parking will be required. Program Procedures: Page 2 of 3 Starfire Operations Manager ( "OM ") will meet with the Tournament Director ("TD "), Field Scheduler ( "FS ") and Parking Manager ("PM ") on a weekly basis to ensure that planned programming is adequately sized so as not to exceed the available parking resources. The following actions will be taken to ensure that program demand does not exceed the available parking resources: > Tournament Capacity — the maximum tournament capacity will be established so as not to exceed the available parking resources. The TD will not accept any team registration that exceeds the maximum tournament capacity. >. Game Scheduling — the TD will stagger game starts during Starfire tournaments by 30 minutes; approximately 50% of the fields will commence on the hour and the remainder on the half hour. With participants typically arriving 30 minutes prior to scheduled game times this will result in significantly reduced parking demand with an approximately equivalent number of attendees departing and arriving concurrently. • Team Notification — the TD will issue an email notification to all registered participants a minimum of 2 times prior to each tournament. These notifications will provide teams with information and options with regard to available parking resources including the provision of a complimentary shuttle service to and from Interurban parking locations if required. • Field Scheduling - during special events the FS shall ensure that some or all of the surrounding fields are closed if required so as not to exceed available parking resources. The required level of field closure shall be determined by the OM. > Hotel Partners — the TD shall contact Starfire hotel partners prior to each toumament to arrange for complimentary shuttle service to and from the complex be provided to visiting teams. > Police Assistance — the OM will place a request to the Tukwila Police Department ( "TPD ") at least one month prior to each special event requesting assistance with traffic management at the Fort Dent Way / Interurban Avenue intersection. In the event that the TPD is unable to fulfill the request, the OM will subsequently make the same request of the King County Sheriffs Department. -2- \#tarifte Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Revision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: Julie H ral Manager 11-18 -08 Date Teddy Mitalas, Tournament & Event Director Date • 3 Page 3 of 3 • Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Appendix C (For Reference Only) Previous Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation — November 2003 • 46::.. h- al C. N a) E o :, U C0 O N w . L 7 O _O > o) a) n C O co as 0) a) C N m el 3 N U CN L a)3 0 O c > C O U Z N c a) -0 N N N cu 3 a) a) w w 3 U o as ¶I1 C it 7 (D P. 3 .0 0 a)= rn� 4 O 0 O C .0 O ` N O N N 0 U O 2 en O ffl U a) C T a) a)1- CO 0 co .0 O N � 7 ... U I- Q W F- O Z Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 9 27 27 ONO h O ONO 10'1 01ONO t09 OONO 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals k=?C:_? „ rI Worst case for weekday PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 0% Bus 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 27 77 77 00 27 77 `*n O n N O n '�'n n N o n O� 'Rn n N O n 0) "i Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) 0) 0 m r N v. 1.42 Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour' 27 77 77 m n n N n O ° O n n N O n 0 ° O n n N O n 0 ", n n N O n 0 10 0) 16 o 0) 0 0)Cd a'va O FQa 54 151 151 O 54 151 0 205 N o 0 no N 325 g0,u) N 325 Starfire Sports Soccer Center Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 TABLE A -1 PREVIOUS STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GEN PM Peak Hour Soccer Fields Trip Generation Summary by 1 m a '5 76 m '9- 1. a 40 112 112 40 112 0 o o 152 1 o v o 248 � o ° 1 m 248 rn O C C 2 O yN Z l 7 a V C„ N Q 0 10 N 0 'P 0 CO N O R V,° N 0 Q P ,° 0 G U d P. of a y O wa 120 224 112 120 224 0 -- N 0 CO V N 0 472 -O ' m N R Q N 1O N o m O N .- s- O 1336 N N a E 3 0 0 m CL 10 co Q m co c0 o ID W O O N 10 m 07 C N CO CO CO N N d E LL Z N V 7 N O V N N Q P N N R V N N Q Q iii 7 0 2 5pm - 8pm 1 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30 pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm -8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm o . a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar • Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct 0 0 r Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) Nov - Jan TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) Feb -Mar (TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Apr - May Grass Fields (No Lights) Adult Apr - May (TOTAL Indoor Fields • Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields (No Lights) Adult Jun -Aug TOTAL L w O U E E U o co O L U N L • a W o CO L 1— c, W i- L Y co N- CO n N N rn 0 1000 SF GFA N 0) Recreational Community Center Total new trips M c N CO 7 �0 • .fl • CD 0 N .c L 7 V N_ ▪ c c c CO w O u) N (a N ca 7 T-) CO 0 N C N • ° O 0. c r ac) • 3 o c N Q U O • 0 r Q) c c c • .N a• • E 0 +O+ O ca 0) E • y m • E • • • 0 u. z, r a) c EA d U c 7 • ca 0▪ 1— 7 E E O U �+ c V tt• E Lo V = c re • V L Previous P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park Generation Rate 1- O H CO CO 0 N O 0 rn 0 0 Q N. • Regional Park Total new trips ai 0 cn 0 U a) •o c m -J a) C � 0 o c .o o co Ig m c C C7 m o .. I- • •c (-9 E a o H c c a) • 0 c `) o) co W E 0 o a IT, N a-0 rn a) C • to o co a) J a) N CNA N C L �N. H Z C: \Temp\XPgrpwise \12 PREVIOUS Table A -2 • STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON • • UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR STARFIRE SPORTS PREPARED BY Parsons Brinckerhoff 999 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98104 December 16, 2008 Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Table of Contents Title Introduction Page Project Description 1 Analysis Scenarios 2 Project Traffic Project Vehicle trips for Transportation Concurrency 3 Project Traffic Distribution 4 Parking Analysis Parking Supply 4 Parking Demand 5 Parking Plan Summary Average Day Scenario 6 Local Soccer Tournament Scenario 6 Capacity Stadium Event Scenario 8 List of Tables Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios 2 Table 2 — Trip Generation for Tournament Scenarios 4 Table 3 — Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario 4 Table 4 — Worst -Case Parking Demand - Local Tournament 5 And Average Day Scenarios. Table 5 — Starfire Sports Complex Parking Demand Analysis 7 List of Appendices Appendix A — Proposed Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation Appendix B — Starfire Sports Complex Managed Parking Policy Appendix C — (For Reference Only) Previous Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation - November 2003 i • • • STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Project Description This report documents the trip generation, trip distribution, and potential traffic impacts for the proposed changes to the Starfire Sports Complex currently operating within Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Fort Dent Park is located just north of Fort Dent Way, between the Green River and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe railroad tracks. The City has taken ownership of the park from King County. Starfire Sports is a Washington State Not - for - Profit Corporation holding a 40 -year concession agreement with the City to construct and operate concessions in Fort Dent Park. Facilities that Starfire has operated within the park for the past four years include four unlit soccer fields, four lighted soccer fields, four lighted softball diamonds, and one building with two indoor soccer fields and ancillary spaces. One lighted soccer field has permanent stadium bleacher seating for about 2,700 spectators. The Starfire Sports Complex is proposing to modify their facilities by converting the four softball diamonds to four soccer fields. Some of the new soccer facilities will be used during the day as practice fields by the new Seattle Sounders FC Major League Soccer club. The proposed plan for the Complex is to re -grade the area of the softball diamonds to allow four more soccer fields • (one unlit grass field and three lighted artificial turf fields) to be constructed to provide additional fields for all users of the Complex and suitable practice facilities for the Sounders. This plan also proposes construction of 40 new parking spaces on the site, as shown in the attached site plan. • The result of the proposed changes for the Complex will be a reduction in peak traffic and parking demand due to the conversion of the softball fields to soccer fields that have lower trip generation rates and more favorable peaking characteristics. In addition, two of the new turf soccer fields will be smaller fields designed for U -11 play and teams will have 11 players on average, rather than 14, further reducing trip generation. It is expected that the Sounders will generate only about 50 daily weekday trips and none in the p.m. peak hour (compared to 90 in the p.m. peak hour alone for the softball fields as shown later in Table 2). The most likely time of use for the practice facilities is weekdays from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. which is the period of lightest use for the Complex on an average weekday. The new soccer fields will also be available throughout the remainder of the day and weekends for other users as shown later in Table 2. As noted above, the parking count on the site will also increase by 40, from 450 to 490 spaces. The Parking Plan described in this document is based on the successful operation of the Strarfire Sports Complex to date. The Complex has now managed parking for four years of daily operations, nearly 35 major tournaments and several capacity stadium events with no parking 1 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN problems and no complaints from adjacent businesses. This experience has been incorporated into a very effective Managed Parking Policy that is included in Appendix B. The reduction in traffic and parking demand anticipated with the proposed changes should only make this policy that much more effective in the future. Analysis Scenarios The analyses for this study were based on the three different scenarios discussed below and summarized in Table 1. The Average Day scenario has the fewest fields in use with typically only one team practicing per field. Because this is by far the most usual operating condition, this scenario was used before the Complex initially opened to determine the number of net new trips that could impact the City's concurrency mitigation projects. The November 2003 Parking Management Plan (PMP) analyzed a Combined Tournaments (Softball and Soccer) Scenario. This scenario was used as the basis for the level of service (LOS) calculations for transportation concurrency before the Complex initially opened, with LOS being calculated for both 2003 and 2010 traffic volumes. With the conversion of softball fields to soccer fields, this scenario has been renamed the Local Soccer Tournament scenario for this document. The Local Soccer Tournament scenario has a large, local, 3 -day soccer tournament running over a weekend with up to 11 of the proposed 12 outdoor soccer fields and both indoor fields in use. This represents a worst case scenario as it is Starfire policy to close the indoor fields for all activity during tournaments. These tournaments have higher traffic demand then regional or national soccer tournaments where teams tend to arrive in larger vehicles with more participants per vehicle. The Capacity Stadium Event scenario assumes an event that fills the existing stadium bleacher seats. This scenario has been updated from 1,800 seats in the initial Parking Management Plan to 2,700 seats in this document. While such events are infrequent, this scenario (together with a modified Average Day scenario described later) is used to evaluate the peak parking demand for the Starfire facility. Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios Scenario . 4 • "�° >. Approximate ' Frequency'. (Days per Year) Used For s,� ° _ � --� � � �• Average Day 344 Determination of net new trips Local Soccer Tournament (formerly called Combined Tournaments) 21 Concurrency level of service Capacity Stadium Event 2 Peak parking demand (in conjunction with a modified Average Day Scenario) 2 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN • PROJECT TRAFFIC • • Project Vehicle Trips For Transportation Concurrency Tables A -1, A -2 and A -3 in Appendix A summarize the maximum seasonal usage and the p.m. peak hour vehicle trip generation for all proposed Starfire Sports Complex activities except capacity stadium events. Previous Tables A -1 and A -2 from the November 2003 PMP have been included for reference in Appendix C. Please note that previous Table A -1 (page 1 of 3) has been corrected for the ratio of lighted to unlighted soccer fields in the Complex. This ratio was estimated in November 2003 during planning for the Complex at 7:1, but the actual ratio after 4 years of operation is 4:4. However, this correction does not impact the worst case scenario which was the only data in the table that was used in previous analyses. The information in Table A -1 includes an estimate of the number of players on each field in the p.m. peak hour during local soccer tournaments. The number of players is then multiplied by a factor to determine the additional number of spectators, and then by the number of fields in use to estimate the total number of people attending the Starfire Sports Complex during the p.m. peak hour. For the analysis, it was assumed that all seven of the turf fields would be available for play year around, and four of the five grass fields would be in shape for play at any given time from April through October. The factor for spectators has been modified since the Initial Traffic Impact Analysis (February 2003) from 0.50 to 0.35 for youth soccer based on trip generation data for the Twin Creeks Soccer Fields in Sunnyvale, California. After calculating the total number of people attending the Complex, the numbers of entering and exiting vehicle trips were calculated based on assumptions for average car occupancy (ACO) and participant arrivals. Also added to the trip generation are the trips in Table A -2 associated with support facilities (e.g. exercise area, offices, food court) housed in the indoor soccer building. These trips were estimated based on Land Use Code 495 (Recreational Community Center) from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Based on current procedures, the proposed daily operation for the soccer fields will have eight to twelve fields available for use at different times of year, most with only one team, no officials, and few if any spectators beyond the coach(es). The information in Table A -3 has been added to the PMP to estimate the number of entering and exiting vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour on an average day. The number of daily vehicle trips was estimated for various times of year using the same methodology outlined above for large tournaments but with assumptions based on actual daily operations. A weighted average was then calculated to obtain p.m. peak hour vehicle trips for an average day on an annual basis. Table 2 lists all of the activities and vehicle trip generation included in the study under the Local Soccer Tournament scenario. This includes the highest trips from Tables A -1 and A -2. It should be noted that the total estimated number of peak hour trips (in and out) will be reduced by 6 percent from 371 to 348 by the proposed conversion of softball fields into additional soccer fields. The level of service analyses with project trips detailed in the prior Traffic and Parking Analysis Report (April 2003) were based on 377 peak hour trips. 3 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 2 — Trip Generation for Tournament Scenarios Facility Size /Area Units PM In (vph) PM Out (vph) PM Totals Combined Tournaments (a) 12 Fields 77 Soccer Fields 10 Fields 181 63 244 Softball Fields 4 Fields 82 8 90 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 Previous Trip Totals (a): .' =x ; "1'68 276 95 371 Local Soccer Tournament (b) Soccer Fields 13 Fields 230 81 311 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 37 .Proposed. Trip Totals (b):. . ` 243 105 Y "348 Notes: (a) From November 2003 Parking Management Plan; (b) Based on proposed field conversions. Table 3 lists all of the activities and vehicle trip generation included in the study under the Average Day scenario. This includes the highest trips from Table A -2 and the weighted average of trips from Table A -3. Table 3 — Trip Generation for Average Day Scenario , • � >;r .��- .'Facility Size /Area" Units PM In (vph) " -PM Out (vph) PM Totals" Soccer Fields 12 Fields 77 44 144 Support Facilities 21 1,000. SF 13 24 37 -Proposed Trip Totals: ? ;, a. - "90 _ .' =x ; "1'68 :`:;; , 4N158 ✓ Project Traffic Distribution Project traffic for the Starfire Sports Complex was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based on an assumed uniform distribution of clientele for the Complex throughout the Greater Seattle area. This distribution included 15% and 25% coming from the north and south, respectively, via 1 -5 (ramping to 1 -405); 15% and 5% coming from the north and south, respectively, via Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway; 5% coming from the west via SR 518/1 -405; and 35% coming from the east via 1 -405. PARKING ANALYSIS Parking Supply Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. Starfire Sports has also obtained a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant to use up to 461 existing paved and striped parking spaces on commercial properties immediately adjacent to the southern edge of Fort Dent Park. The proposed project will add 40 new parking spaces near the newly converted soccer fields. This would provide a total of 951 spaces on or adjacent to the project site, as shown in Table 5. In addition, the Complex has access to several hundred parking spaces through informal arrangements with buildings on Interurban Avenue to provide parking for very large stadium events. 4 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN • Parking Demand • The peak period parking demand for the Local Soccer Tournament and Average Day scenarios are based on the maximum difference between entering and exiting traffic shown in Table A -1, A -2 and A -3, and three other factors. One factor is that the cycle time on most of the fields is between one and two hours, so the maximum parking needed could be twice the hourly need. The second factor is that there will be some residual parking needed after each game or practice to accommodate things such as team meetings, coaches' talks, and participants and fans that might stay for some or all of a following game or practice. The third factor is spaces would be needed for game officials and /or staff. Resulting parking requirements based on these factors are shown in Table 4. These requirements represent worst -case conditions because the analysis assumes games and practices start simultaneously on all outdoor fields. Start times can actually be staggered in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand, resulting in a larger surplus of on -site parking for these scenarios. Table 4 — Worst -Case Parking Demand -Local Soccer Tournament and Average Day Scenarios Facility Local Soccer Tournament Average Day Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -1) 190 -- Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -2) -11 -11 Largest Delta (Entering Minus Exiting Traffic — Table A -3) -- 53 Combined Delta 179 42 Factor 1: Cycle Time (Assumes non - staggered start times) 179 42 Factor 2: Residual Parking 90 21 Factor 3: Referee and/or staff parking 50 15 (a) Proposed Parking Totals 498 120 , (a) Staff only — no referees. It is anticipated that the highest single demand for parking will occur with the Capacity Stadium Event scenario. The initial Parking Management Plan (November 2003) considered parking requirements for 1,800 seats. Over the first four years of operation, the Complex has added 900 bleacher seats for a total of 2,700, and has had events with up to 3,000 attendees with no parking difficulties. In the past, capacity events have been exclusively professional soccer games. With the new Seattle Sounders FC playing at Qwest field, the likelihood of events this size at the Starfire Complex could be reduced to only a couple times a year, if at all, for events like exhibition games or graduations. A capacity event could require as many as 1,080 parking spaces. In addition, it was assumed that there would be some parking demand created by other daily activities at the Complex. However, recognizing the substantial parking demands for a Capacity Stadium Event, it was assumed, as per the Starfire Managed Parking Policy attached as Appendix B to this document, that other Complex facilities would be managed to 5 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN reduce the Average Day parking demand by 50% to 60 spaces during special events. The resulting total parking demand during a Large Stadium Event would be 1,140 spaces, which is about 200 cars over the 951 total committed parking spaces available on and adjacent to the project site. For these rare capacity events, Starfire has additional procedures described below to ensure adequate parking. Table 5 compares the parking demand estimates for the Local Soccer Tournament, Average Day and Capacity Stadium Event scenarios with the available parking supply. PARKING PLAN SUMMARY Average Day Scenario The 490 parking spaces proposed at Fort Dent Park should easily accommodate the estimated Average Day scenario peak parking demand of 120 spaces for the day -to -day Starfire Sports Complex activities. No special parking procedures are anticipated. Local Soccer Tournament Scenario Large, local soccer tournaments could require some additional parking or proactive parking management in order to accommodate the estimated parking demand for 498 spaces. Procedures already in place to accomplish this include: • Starfire staggers game starts during tournaments by 30 minutes; approximately 50% of the fields will commence on the hour and the remainder on the half hour. With participants typically arriving 30 minutes prior to scheduled game times this will result in significantly reduced parking demand with an approximately equal number of attendees departing and arriving concurrently. • Starfire Sports limits maximum tournament capacity so as not to exceed the available parking resources. Any team registrations that exceed the maximum tournament capacity are not accepted. • Starfire Sports issues an email notification to all registered participants a minimum of two times prior to each tournament. These notifications provide teams with information and options with regard to available parking resources. • Starfire Sports uses preferential carpool parking and /or paid parking to keep the parking demand for this scenario in line with the available on -site parking. Starfire Sports has also secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 461 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park if needed for this scenario. • Any off -site parkers would utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain safe and convenient access to the site. 6 December 16, 2008 • • • .STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Table 5 7 December 16, 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX UPDATED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Capacity Stadium Event Scenario Starfire Sports has secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 461 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park. These spaces would be available evenings and weekends to supplement the 490 existing spaces at the Complex, for a total of up to 951 available spaces. Capacity events in the existing 2,700 -seat stadium will be rare with the potential for professional soccer games no longer available, but if they occur they could require up to 1,140 parking spaces. This means that there may be an occasional need for additional off - site parking for up to 200 cars, or additional measures to reduce the parking demand by about 200 cars. The following are measures Starfire has typically used to ensure the availability of adequate parking for capacity stadium events. These procedures, included in Appendix B, have already proven to be effective for stadium events with up to 3,000 in attendance: • During stadium events Starfire Sports ensures that some or all of the surrounding fields are closed if required so as not to exceed available parking resources. • Off site parkers utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the covenanted commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain access to the site. • Starfire Sports has established procedures to encourage spectators for stadium events to carpool or use other modes of transportation to minimize parking demand. These procedures have included fees for parking, and clear communication of the parking situation and options in all participant applications, tickets and flyers for large events. • Starfire Sports provides traffic control workers and parking attendants as needed to accommodate the ingress and egress of traffic to the Complex parking and adjacent covenanted parking for large stadium events. • Starfire Sports contacts the Tukwila Police Department ( "TPD ") at least one month prior to each special event to request assistance with traffic management at the Fort Dent Way / Interurban Avenue intersection. In the event that the TPD is unable to fulfill the request, Starfire Sports subsequently makes the same request to the King County Sheriff's Department. • Starfire Sports has informal arrangements with several commercial properties located along Interurban Avenue that have provided additional off -site parking spaces for past events. Starfire could also provide a courtesy shuttle between these locations and the Complex. • Starfire Sports partners with hotels prior to each tournament to arrange for complimentary shuttle service to and from the complex for visiting teams. Several hotels are also within walking distance of the Complex utilizing existing and proposed trail facilities. 8 December 16, 2008 • • • 0 w J CO H PROPOSED STARFIRE SPORTS SOCCER COMPLEX PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS PREVIOUS DELTA (g) + or ( -) 0 0 LOO rte. v PARKING DELTA (c) +or( -) M M Lo co Nt- as a0 AVAILABLE ADJACENT SPACES (b) NI- AVAILABLE ON -SITE SPACES (a) ca O a) 0 O Q) PARKING DEMAND (Vehicles) 0 N O V 0 O co I O 0(De- ANALYSIS SCENARIO DESCRIPTION Average Day Parking Local Soccer Tournament Parking (d) Capacity Stadium Event Parking: CONDITION NO. N M w H 0 Z t z O U > - a 3 O C y `) N co ct " C O co 0) O4- C� C -0 7 p .O N C E > >. O a Q O C U Vj CU > zoc U c0 O co O. F► a) U 0 00 2 O C mac 0 7 c y 0) C ( c 0 (0 N O C O U E . a) O N co CL a 7 N Q a) a 7 CO = c) a ❑.0 0• c E� co m O C a) p c as '.�'. a) o (13 c E (0 C N C N -0 N 6a)O • E0)C > M0 a) 0 0 N C N (0 a N (0 a) as ' •y N d - d C u) — (0co >`-0 E 0Od 2 a) a) 0 U a) M 0 co u) a Q 0) 0 X O= C O N U > 2 (''''00:E.< ' 0) a, ._ 0 tt N > E co co CL nj -O � a) a) w w a) m mmEa) �a)Z a l I) a) E ca E 2`E- a E 0 a) (0 (0 0) '- cn o I-- FL-- v) U) < a U. as .D U U a) 7 C: \Temp\XPgrpwise \3 UPDATED Table 5 (insert page 7) - Parking Plan 12 -16 -08 • • • Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Appendix A Proposed Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation C:\Temp\XPgrpwise \5 FINAL Table A -1 12 -16 -08 Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour O N m m cc) .- O 54 0) O r, ... O W O C�7 O H m O CO "'-co N 0.35 Spectators / Player at games 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals I 'Worst case for weekday PM Peak Total Vehicle Trip Generation 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 5% Walk / Bike 10% Walk / Bike 0% Bus 5% Bus 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour_ N- CO o r` N O CO r- 230: I r-- m O N O f7 153 rs CD o N O o) t7 ' 153 r` to O N O O CO 0) 244 1 N. co O N O of CO 0) 244 I Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) r: m CO m m 0 I 1.47 I r- v Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour r`mor• N CO CO N. 0 N r` ti, O N 0) CO 0 153 r too N 0 0) CO o ") a' n mo N o 0) co 0) I 244 n mo N 0 0) CO 0) I 244 I N 0 t0 Y N C (U a s O m to i = aQa- N m N 0 N m 0 I 302 1 N O m U3 0 I 302 O m N 422 O CO O N .- 422 73 a g U y Y )aka a O V o 0 0 I 224 O V Q O 224 O f D) 320 I O? z 2R I 320 0 c c o V v., y z't�'�a Cl 10 N R N t0 N 0 m N 0 l0 N 0 0) N 0 t0 N V N 0 V) N cr 13 ns t` T n T CO X 0 wa 0 0 0 N CO � V r 0 0 N co o O r m co 0 CO 0 N N N m 0 .- r I 556 0000.0 N N N N r 736 O CO O N 0 N N C') N r 0 m 1 TABLE PM PEAK HOU r Fields Trip Gel d 0_ COm 12 T y 0 0 N E. o ca < N N O t0 O o N O m CO V 0 m N O m CO O �) C7 CO m O m 0 80 1 `o N N V .0 —y U. Z N in N LO '.: N N N t0 N N N N t0 N N N N t0 N N MI N t0 Hours of Use 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm -8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 9am - 9pm 5pm -8pm v 0 a) a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields U -11 Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct TOTAL •r c: „, . xg:. Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields U -11 Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Nov - Jan TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields U -11 Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Feb -Mar TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Synthetic Fields U -11 Apr - May Grass Fields . Adult Apr - May TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields U -11 Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Aug TOTAL C:\Temp\XPgrpwise \5 FINAL Table A -1 12 -16 -08 • TABLE A-2 Community Center P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreationa s' O c ti ti C▪ N CO rn 0 1000 SF GFA CV O O Recreational Community Center Total new trips C CU c N 0 a • V .0 ` u v) c c C to a) N c ea C ✓ N Cf c O • O ) 0. C a) 3 O c c u) cc u) 0 2 >, 0) O) C •c EC G c -0 • 1) E +O+ O CD E : d + • d N E d w O v0 t r d C U c z` ea C • O V E O U ea R O us U to • a • L P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park (0 0 1— CD CO O CV O Q N Regional Park Total new trips ai 0 U a) v N J N. rn rn C. 2 o m a W c .c .o m c m g • .a o W ) a) a o vi o Y a) c m co W c o o a (0 U U o v a c • v, E 1`- O N J o N N C L F- 0 z ., C: \Temp\XPgrpwise \6 UPDATED Table A -2 12 -16 -08 Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour m N O CD CO N OD O el N O N COO 38 J C O CO 43 1 0.10 Spectators / Player at games 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals I I Worst case for weekday PM Peak Total Vehicle Trip Generation 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 5% Walk / Bike 10% Walk / Bike 0% Bus 5% Bus 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 70% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour (-0101r) C) — N V) QO r N N •- CI e- N N N, .- O O h V) CD N V ,- O (n CI t0 CO to N o. (- O t7 '- (n CO OI Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) co CO I� CD n CO co O co O Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour 0) N In CI .- N N a0 N N th O V) N N O Cn aN O h V) 0) N Q � O M " Cn V) O) O N . O M M CO OI d 0 76. Y 01 co d V ) 0 C 0 5 _ ;:-.15 Q tl N r V co N n N V N N V O N CD N 108 N 0 N V 0 CV CD N 108 N O r V V) N r- N sr 168 I N O C. a VI N n N R 168 I a a ' to m o U = a 1 it m a Y. 0 0 N CV N n N V 0 CO N N VI N 0 CO O) 0 CO N N 0 co V N O 98 I 0 0 N CO N n N M 148 I 0 0 N (D O N r N 01 148 I `i' ', a m a= a'0 V Y a) N Y fo N ZitD d N co N el tli N V N O Co N O V N O CO N O VI N CO ts..4 N O N N CO V a) a) 0. t` t C 1. a X wa 0 0 V O� CD v n r es 0 0 0 CO v r O 244 1 0 0 0 t0 Q r O 342 O CO O sr O CD v CO 432 I O W O co O 1- O CD V) N •' TABLE OMPLEX PM PE r Fields Trip Gel a m U O a (O ,R O a co N t0 ° V O N (0 co F. V O N t0 CO ° V V) P) co co O t0 O 80 I `o m Ey 7 LL" z N V) N V) '��:: N V) N V) N N V) N VI N N V) N V) N N V) N V) Hours of Use anEno co m CO (n io E E E ) C) n Nina,: LO 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm V 0 T._ a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields U -11 Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields U -11 Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Nov - Jan TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields U -11 Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) NA Feb -Mar TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Synthetic Fields U -11 Apr - May Grass Fields Adult Apr - May TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields U -11 Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Aug TOTAL Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Appendix B Starfire Sports Complex Managed Parking Policy • • i • 4811stfire Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Revision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: MANAGED PARKING POLICY Purpose: The policy exists to ensure that program activity does not exceed available parking resources or impact neighboring businesses or streets. Applies to: All Starfire Managers Applies When: Managed parking will be in effect in the event that planned program activity will require or exceed all of the onsite parking capacity. Available Parking Resources: Onsite: Approximately 450 paved and striped spaces located within the Starfire Sports and Entertainment Complex ( "the Complex "). Offsite: Approximately 461 paved and striped spaces in the commercial properties owned by John C. Radovich ( "JCR ") located immediately adjacent to the complex. Starfire maintains a standing agreement with JCR for the utilization of these spaces. Additional parking in the commercial properties situated along Interurban Avenue. A courtesy shuttle will be secured by Starfire to transport attendees between these Interurban parking locations and the complex. • Fees: Parking fees will be assessed on a per vehicle basis any time that managed parking is in effect. There will be two levels of parking fees imposed: daily parking & weekend parking. Exemptions: The following people are exempt from paying the parking fee upon entering the park during Starfire events: > Current Starfire Sports members, correctly displaying a valid parking pass on the front windshield of their vehicle; and ... . ➢ City of Tukwila Residents who present a valid Drivers' License showing Tukwila residency. Team Structure: The core parking team includes: 1 Parking Manager, 3-4 Site Supervisors, 6 -8 team members. Large scale events requiring 12 or more team members will be bolstered by volunteers from clubs, teams and organization who have applied to fulfill the role as a fundraising opportunity. Parking Manager Site Supervisor: (x 3 -41 • . 1 1 I 1 Team fundraising Members Group ;.' (x 6 -8) , \, (as needed) , - 1 - • Page 1 of 3 tar /ire SPORTS Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Revision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: Parking Demand: Program activity levels at Starfire fall into 3 distinct categories with regard to attendance and associated parking demand: 1. Regular day to day program activity including field rentals, leagues, training, and after school programs: onsite parking will adequately accommodate this type of activity. The lack of spectators and pick up / drop off nature of vehicular traffic ensures that the onsite parking resource will not be exceeded. Managed parking not required. 2. Weekend Tournaments (typically 2 — 3 days in duration): Tournaments may be local, regional or national. Regional and national tournament teams tend to arrive in fewer and larger vehicles with more participants per vehicle. Managed parking may be required. 3. Special Events: Special events typically utilize the Starfire Sports stadium. If bleacher seating for the event is forecast to be at or near capacity managed parking will be required. Program Procedures: Page2 of 3 Starfire Operations Manager ( "OM ") will meet with the Tournament Director ("TD "), Field Scheduler ( "FS ") and Parking Manager ( "PM ") on a weekly basis to ensure that planned programming is adequately sized so as not to exceed the available parking resources. The following actions will be taken to ensure that program demand does not exceed the available parking resources: > Tournament Capacity — the maximum tournament capacity will be established so as not to exceed the available parking resources. The TD will not accept any team registration that exceeds the maximum tournament capacity. > Game Scheduling — the TD will stagger game starts during Starfire tournaments by 30 minutes; approximately 50% of the fields will commence on the hour and the remainder on the half hour. With participants typically arriving 30 minutes prior to scheduled game times this will result in significantly reduced parking demand with an approximately equivalent number of attendees departing and arriving concurrently. • Team Notification — the TD will issue an email notification to all registered participants a minimum of 2 times prior to each tournament. These notifications will provide teams with information and options with regard to available parking resources including the provision of a complimentary shuttle service to and from Interurban parking locations if required. > Field Scheduling - during special events the FS shall ensure that some or all of the surrounding fields are closed if required so as not to exceed available parking resources. The required level of field closure shall be determined by the OM. > Hotel Partners — the TD shall contact Starfire hotel partners prior to each tournament to arrange for complimentary shuttle service to and from the complex be provided to visiting teams. > Police Assistance — the OM will place a request to the Tukwila Police Department ( "TPD ") at least one month prior to each special event requesting assistance with traffic management at the Fort Dent Way / Interurban Avenue intersection. In the event that the TPD is unable to fulfill the request, the OM will subsequently make the same request of the King County Sheriffs Department. -2- • • tarfire Business Area: Related Services Date: March 4, 2008 Document Type: Policy Revision No.: 1 Completed By: JHL Approved By: Date: Julie H • 11 -18-og ral Manager Date Teddy Mitalas, Tournament & Event Director Date Page3 of 3 3 Starfire Sports Complex Updated Parking Management Plan Appendix C (For Reference Only) Previous Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation — November 2003 • • NOTE: Table A -1 Starfire Sports Soccer Center Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 Page 1 of 3 TABLE A -1 PREVIOUS STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION (Corrected) PM Peak Hour Soccer Fields Trip Generation Summary by Time of Year Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 9 27 27 O) N O M O) O N O ( m '1 O) O N O 0) O N O I 36 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals 1 'Worst case for weekday PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 0% Bus 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 27 77 77 77 MEM N N- N r CO 195 27 0 77 91 1 195 Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) P on co N Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour 27 77 77 m 77 0 ' N O r 0 ° N O n O) 0 N O 1- O) m a O y C d a V a p To d = lo-aa 54 151 151 l9 151 0 O N N O N O O g O N N N .- .- N V" O N N N) v a , m = o wY W N d a 40 112 112 t0 112 0 ` O t- Ni. O O 152 40 0 112 96 248 40 0 112 96 248 o c a i a CO V a y z D ` a N P° O co O P O O ° N O P N D- ` T 11 O a j, O X ,p wCL 120 I 224 112 m N P 224 0 344 O co P N N N O N N 0O P m 10 N N N P .- .- N m CO O m m N° tO N N m 0) )O t- t- CO m m d Ha a d 03 0 m a to m P m m m O co co m O N co m m P N m m M m o .- N N 'O y i z N Cr P N P P ` N N P P N N P P C'0'0 Hours of Use 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm None E E E a N a O co N CO 0 f0 N m N a N 5pm 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm O 0 a Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat i Weekday I Weekday Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct ITOTAL .. . _ Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) Nov - Jan (TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) Feb -Mar TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Apr - May Grass Fields (No Lights) Adult Apr - May TOTAL �IndoorFields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields (Lighted) Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields (No Lights) Adult Jun - Auq [TOTAL • • TABLE A -2 Community Center Previous P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreationa 0 c co c d ea N w V — w N o J ti N N M M rn 0 1000 SF GFA Recreational Community Center Total new trips c -p R C r O V .0 ` C) _) C C C l6 d N itc y c6 C )c co C) c O 0 0. c r 3 0c c N ni N 0 O g O } a) C) C :a E E C •y o 0 + O d7 E r, E O O c6 t u- w d C d L- 0 c co '_ O E E O V To .0 t6 C) = re V L Previous P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park r Rf CL 0 0 d 0. 1- 0 H 0 c c d 0 0 Na w M — 0 N 0 c6 J O CD ( O O N O rn o 0 1) U Regional Park Total new trips ai v 0 U y c m J 0) Q) rn lV C. 2 o m 2 Wc .0 ,O co i m c a) m n o 1.6. H a) a) E n O N w 1 a) a) Co c0) o) m w 0 o a V co fV U o V y N C N � U O C a7 (1) J 7 N a) a) H Z �. C: \Temp\XPgrpwise \12 PREVIOUS Table A -2 FORT DENT PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS PREPARED FOR STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER PREPARED BY Branco. 10900 NE 8TH Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98004 April 29, 2003 FORT DENT PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Starfire Sports Center Traffic and Parking Analysis Table of Contents Title Page Introduction Project Description 1 Existing Street System and Programmed Improvements 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 3 Forecast Traffic Volumes 3 Trip Generation Introduction 10 Vehicle Trips 10 Net New Trips 11 Trip Distribution Non - Project Traffic 11 Project Traffic 12 Level of Service Methodology Introduction 12 HOV Facility Impacts 13 Level of Service Summary 14 Parking Analysis Existing Parking 14 Parking Demand 14 Contingency Parking 16 Summary of Findings Project Traffic 17 Project Parking 17 List of Tables Table 1— Starfire Sports Center Facilities Schedule 1 Table 2 — PM Peak Hour Volume Summary 6 Table 3 — Trip Generation for Starfire Sports Facilities 11 Table 4 — Level of Service Criteria — Signalized Intersections 13 Table 5 —Level of Service Summary 15 List of Figures Figure A — Vicinity Map 2 Figure B — Existing Channelization 4 Figure C — Proposed Channelization 5 Entranco i April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER INTRODUCTION Project Description This report documents the trip generation, trip distribution, and potential traffic impacts of the Starfire Sports Center proposed to be opened entirely within Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Fort Dent Park is located just north of Fort Dent Way, between the Green River and the Burlington Northern and Santa FE railroad tracks. The City has recently taken ownership of the park from King County. Starfire Sports is a Washington State Not - for - Profit Corporation holding a 40 -year lease with the City to construct and operate concessions in Fort Dent Park that will eventually include eight (seven lighted) soccer fields, four lighted softball diamonds, and one building with two indoor soccer fields and ancillary spaces. These facilities will be built and /or improved in phases, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 — Starfire Sports Center Facilities Schedule Four Grass Fields Spring 2003 Four Synthetic Fields September 2003 Indoor Facility November 2003 Enhance Three Grass Fields Spring 2004 Existing Street System and Programmed Improvements Access into Fort Dent Park is provided via the intersection of Interurban Ave South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 westbound off- and on- ramps, and a two -lane extension of Fort Dent Way on a bridge over the Green River. Interstate 405 (1 -405) provides convenient access to this intersection for traffic from throughout the Greater Seattle Area. Traffic coming to the park from the north and south on 1 -5, and from the west on State Route (SR) 518, exits 1 -405 at the eastbound off-ramp to Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway, and proceeds north to the park entrance. Traffic from the east exits 1 -405 at the westbound off -ramp to Interurban Avenue directly opposite the park entrance. Traffic leaving the park heading for 1 -5 or SR 518 goes directly onto 1 -405 opposite the park entrance. Traffic heading east from the park turns south onto Interurban/West Valley Highway from the park entrance and proceeds to the directional loop on -ramp to eastbound 1 -405. (See Figure A.) Entranco 1 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA -07 ` \� '..k.:,... ''. W ` - ..... : fa 1, .. \\',s� .i'~.5,,; t Ulu, �� NORTH Dui► amish rf` Rl er1, 1 t • tik 5'�L X 0) S l42ndr SC ',. � 143rd St S T4 rq pI Tukwila S 150th St �'. S S 152nd St Y- › 6 ci) i ° "-4- :414nste r lid S a 8r, FORT DENT '`h PARK S 1 52nd P1 151st St N‘12- 5 S 154th �F t 001YY 6:1-r � 0 ii Southcanter Mall S 153rd h N'. 02003 Mapquest.com. Inc.; 02003 Navigation Technobgies All rights reserved. Use Subject to License /Copyright Figure A Vicinity Map Evans Blarl) D I STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER The City of Tukwila currently has plans underway to improve Interurban Avenue South between, and including, the intersection with Fort Dent Way and the 1 -405 westbound off- and on- ramps, and the intersection with Grady Way /Southcenter Boulevard. Interurban Avenue will be widened to provide restricted lanes that give priority to high occupancy vehicles (HOV's) to access 1 -405, and provide additional capacity for general purpose (non -HOV) traffic. The existing channeliza- tion is shown in Figure B. The future channelization is shown in Figure C. Interurban Avenue South north of the park entrance, and West Valley Highway south of the 1 -405 eastbound on- and off -ramps intersection, are both currently 5 -lane sections, with two through lanes in each direction and a two -way, left -turn lane (TWLTL) in the median. The City is studying improvements for Interurban Avenue, in addition to those noted in the paragraph above, but no definite plans have been finalized. Existing Traffic Volumes Existing p.m. peak hour turning movement counts were obtained for the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on -ramps on Friday, January 10, 2003. Because of the winter season, the existing park entrance was gated closed during the traffic count. Therefore, no existing traffic demand for the park is included in the traffic counts. Recent (April 23, 2002) p.m. peak hour turning movement counts provided for the study by the City of Tukwila were considered to be the "existing" volumes at the following intersections along Interurban Avenue South/ West Valley Highway: • SE 58th Street • Grady Way South / Southcenter Boulevard • 1 -405 eastbound on- and off -ramps / South 156th Street It should be noted that Fort Dent Park was open in April 2002. Therefore, volume counts for the above intersections represent a fairly conservative estimate of existing traffic, since some park traffic is already included. Intersection turning movement volumes considered to represent existing conditions are summarized in table 2 in vehicles per hour (vph) for the p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 PM). Forecast Traffic Volumes Forecast traffic volumes for 2010 were provided by the City of Tukwila and represent approximately a 15% growth in traffic by 2010. The 2010 intersection turning movement volumes are summarized in Table 3 in vehicles per hour (vph) for the p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 PM). Entranco 3 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA 1 -405 WB Ramps Fort Dent Way Southcenter Boulevard Grady Way Figure B Existing Channelization 4 Avenue South 11' 1 -405 WB Ramps Fort Dent Way Southcenter Boulevard Grady Way NORTH West Valley Highway Figure C Proposed Channelization 5 Existing PM Peak Hour Volume Summary Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) Up T.. U/ D) U) Cr) co N N o 0 n (D .- O O n cOo V h r O O 0 (O O O O0o .- c7 m 0 7- n n O O0o 7- n V V cn N O 7- (ul N (D r n .- O r- O 0 n (D O) CO a .(1 l' U Ea) o C) Q. V D) O o N o O c) 'r o 0 0 0 O M„ o O O m o m 4 O M 0 0 2 0 O o 0 0 0 0 v a) @ r Q o CO O ld i..) = .E0 0I 0 X (TO LL W o N r .- (o N U) O� ,r.. O) (O O3 CO a) LL N O1 N 0 I- 0 O m U) D) 0 N D) OD N in o co 0 N N 0 N 0) co N Baseball Fields Trips OO V N 0 K' V 0 Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) N W U) U) 0 U) 7 U) 1■ N U) N o) n O Tr ,- O v- V O CO O h! V I, V 0 o (D D) 0) 0 U) 0 0 co co U) N 0 M (o co co (D Is (o OD (0 V R D) O V U) (h N (D r- 7 D) U) N (o r- 1, r- U) O N- O h o 0 n (o 5 cp E O D F- cC F- J Q I- CC F- J 2 LL I- CC F- J 2 CC I-- CC F- J CC F- CC F- J CC F- CC F- J pE Cr F- CC F- J pE Cr F- CC F- J pE Q H CC F J F=- CC > H CC H J 2 C > I- c[ H J F Cr 7 h CC J i Cr Intersection Direction 58th Ave S / Interurban Ave S NB SB EB WB 1 1 -405 WB Ramps (Fort Dent Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S SB EB WB Southcenter Boulevard (SW Grady Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S (West Valley Highway) SB EB WB 6 Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) m n V O) to v 00 a)) N d o) N. a M co N N n i0 � _ E6 o U a 00000 r) 00000 ai-0 E ro .. < o y a O .n 'c30T3H LL X N0 W o 0 0 0 _N LL d N F- U O CO (13 N N o) Baseball Fields Trips c7 a Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) n 0, N V o) 000 0 co N t- O) h c') C') (D NJec 8 CCJir H I- F- HCC I - I- HQH F- Intersection Direction West Valley Hwy / NB 1 -405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) SB EB WB 2010 PM Peak Hour Volume Summary Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) N N,_ O 2 co O On O.- (OOD 2 ONi co O nO (uD O V 1' N N S3 R3 N n N^ C') OD m 100 0) y n 'C m U = 5 V co O ONO 0 0 Tr O O O m O O a) r 0 0 0 ER O m 4 CI m 0 (7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 2 5r N M U n '&O of 0 W 0 CO LL N (O N 1A O� 7.. (7) (O 0 0 co a) LL ul d N U o CO M (0 Cr) O N CD CO N 1A (0 (O O) N N co N CI) (O N Baseball Fields Trips .- a0 V V N N co M V .- V (7 Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) N N '- O (O co (D O W) r O.- O u) O 00 N-- 0J OD O O^ t` a° Cr) a.- V N Tr M 00 N 17 1A h 1A O n O a0 1n N N n N n CO N n D) a0 00 r O 1n CO 1n 00 O) (') 00 0) N E j o F- m F- J = F- F- cc F- J=LLJ=�J F- F- F- F- F- Cr F- =�J F- F- F- =�J F- F- [L F- =�J F- F- a: F- =CCJ=�J= F- F- F- F- F- CC F- F- F- F- J =� F- F- = CC J =QJ F- f- it f =� F- Intersection Direction 58th Ave S / Interurban Ave S NB SB EB WB 1 -405 WB Ramps (Fort Dent Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S SB EB WB Southcenter Boulevard (SW Grady Way)/ NB Interurban Avenue S (West Valley Highway) SB EB WB 8 Total Volumes with Project Trips (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) ; Tr N. `�.- to in mrnom�c(0�,tn ^�a)no (vc m w > a U -O. 0 0 0 0 0 2 v) 0 0 0 0 0 ccr v E r o y N U a 'Z 0-81- 0 W 0 LL o 0 CO ) LL a 'Cr) U O (D N N O) Baseball Fields Trips c) V Existing Volumes (Future Channelization with HOV Reductions) �r- ��'��o to T to N In o) 0) d' N. N oo 2 J = = F- J = ( t 1- J =([== F- J F- Intersection Direction West Valley Hwy / NB 1 -405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) SB EB WB STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER TRIP GENERATION Introduction The Starfire Sports Center will be open year round to provide high quality soccer, softball and support facilities for teams throughout the region and nationally. The Center will eventually house one of the nation's premier soccer academies and will provide field time for individual and group instruction, practice for local teams, local league games, and local, regional and national soccer and softball tournaments. In terms of traffic demand, the worst case scenario would be during local tournaments, because for regional and national tournaments, the teams tend to arrive in fewer and larger vehicles, with more participants per vehicle. The Center's highest daily use will be on weekends, but there will be some tournaments that begin on Friday that would add vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour. In order to determine the highest number of p.m. peak hour trips that might be generated by the Starfire Sports Center, it was assumed that all of the Center's athletic fields would be in use simultaneously for local soccer and softball tournaments on a Friday. Peak project trips on the weekend will be the same as for a Friday night, but traffic volumes provided by the City indicate that background traffic in the project vicinity is lower on Saturdays, and traffic impacts should generally be Tess than during a weekday peak. Vehicle Trips The "Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 6'h Edition (1997) "is the industry standard for determining the number of trips generated by various types of land uses. However, the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not include data on recreational sports activities such as soccer and softball. Therefore, the approximate maximum trip generation for the overall facility during various times of the year were estimated based on facilities data provided by Starfire Sports, and trip generation rates from other published studies and the internet. Table 3 summarizes the seasonal trip generation, including the number of trips generated by the assumed worst -case scenario for traffic impacts of large, simultaneous, local 3 -day soccer and softball tournaments. The information in Table 3 includes an estimate of the number of players that would be on each field during the p.m. peak hour. The number of players is then multiplied by a factor to determine the additional number of spectators, and then by the number of fields in use to estimate the total number of people attending the Starfire Sports Center during the p.m. peak hour. After calculating the total number of people attending the Sports Center, the number of entering and exiting vehicle trips were calculated based on assumptions for average car occupancy (ACO) and participant arrivals. The factor for spectators has been modified since the Initial Traffic Impact Analysis (February 2003) from 0.50 to 0.35 for youth soccer based on trip generation data for the Twin Creeks Soccer Fields in Sunnyvale, California (OpTrans, Inc. 2000). The estimated trip generation for the Starfire facility compares favorably with the OpTrans data and to findings in a study of youth soccer facilities reported in an on -line ITE article. Table C -1 comparing the available data, and the associated information from the two studies are included in Appendix C. Entranco 10 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Also added to the trip generation were trips associated with future support facilities (exercise area, day care, food court) housed in the indoor soccer building. These trips were estimated based on Land Use Code 495 (Recreational Community Center) from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Table 3 lists all of the activities and trip generation included in the study. Detailed worksheets for trip generation calculations are shown in Appendix A in Tables A -1 and A -2. Table 3 — Trip Generation for Starfire Sports Facilities Soccer Fields 10 Fields 185 64 Baseball Fields 4 Fields 82 8 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 SF = Square Feet; vph = Vehicles per Hour Approximately 1600 -1800 bleacher seats are associated with Field No. 1. However, any event requiring even a portion of this seating would start later in the evening, or would occur on a weekend, and is not expected to influence peak period traffic operations. Net New Trips The 376 p.m. peak hour project trips indicated in Table 3 represent a worst case condition that will occur only a few times a year. For the rest of the year, traffic demand will occur mainly on weekends, and the amount of traffic generated during an average weekday peak hour is estimated to be less than 70% of the worst case scenario. In addition, Fort Dent Park was previously generating about 11 p.m. peak hour trips as a regional park (ITE Trip Generation Manual) that would no longer occur and can be deducted as a credit from the total trips that would be generated by the Starfire Sports Center. Based on the above assumptions, the net new trips for the Starfire Sports Center in a normal p.m. peak hour would be approximately 252 trips ([376x0.70] -11). TRIP DISTRIBUTION Non - Project Traffic The distribution of non - project traffic at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on -ramps is represented by the existing traffic volumes shown in Table 2, since the park was locked at the time of the count. Entranco 11 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Project Traffic Project traffic for the Starfire Sports Center was distributed based on an approximately uniform distribution of clientele for the Center throughout the Greater Seattle area. This distribution included 15% and 25% coming from the north and south, respectively, vial-5 (and 1 -405); 15% and 5% coming from the north and south, respectively, via Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway; 5% coming from the west via SR 518/1 -405; and 35% coming from the east vial-405. The estimated volumes resulting from this distribution of trips are shown in Table 2 for the following intersections along Interurban Avenue South/West Valley Highway: • SE 58th Street • Fort Dent Way /Interstate 405 westbound off- and on -ramps • Grady Way South /Southcenter Boulevard • 1 -405 eastbound off- and on- ramps /South 156th Street The four intersections noted above are those intersections expected to have five or more project trips during the worst case scenario. As noted earlier, this condition will occur only a few times a year when large, local tournaments for soccer and softball occur simultaneously. Of the 248 net new trips during a normal p.m. peak hour, approximately 38 would travel south- bound on Interurban Avenue over the Green River Bridge (between Fort Dent Way and Grady Way), and Tess than 5 trips would be on West Valley Highway at Strander Boulevard. LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY Introduction The level of service in the p.m. peak hour for the four signalized intersections along Interurban Avenue South effected by five or more project trips were analyzed using a computer software program called SYNCHRO. This computer program analyzes and optimizes the operations of individual intersections. Level of service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of the traffic operations at an intersection or along a roadway segment. Level of service is ranked from LOS A, which signifies little or no congestion (i.e. very good traffic operations), to LOS F, which signifies substantial congestion (i.e. very poor traffic operations). At signalized intersections, level of service is calculated for each movement and then is summed in a weighted fashion to yield the LOS for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. The threshold criteria given in the "Highway Capacity Manual (2000) "for level of service at signalized intersections are shown in table 4. Entranco 12 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Table 4 - Level of Service Criteria — Signalized Intersections A < 10.0 seconds B > 10.0 and < 20.0 seconds /vehicle c > 20.0 and < 35.0 seconds /vehicle D > 35.0 and < 55.0 seconds /vehicle E > 55.0 and < 80.0 seconds /vehicle F > 80.0 seconds per vehicle HOV Facility Impacts SYNCHRO and SimTraffic cannot explicitly model High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes at signalized intersections. Therefore, an alternative methodology was created to address the traffic impacts of the existing southbound and westbound HOV facilities, and the additional northbound HOV facility proposed by the City of Tukwila, at the intersection of Interurban Avenue South with Fort Dent Way and the Interstate 405 (1 -405) westbound off- and on- ramps. It was assumed that the HOV volumes (two or more persons per vehicle) were equal to15% of the total existing volumes. Each intersection approach with both general - purpose and HOV lanes received a special adjustment to account for the effects of the HOV lane. The proposed HOV improvement is expected to be implemented in the near future, so it was assumed for the study that the westbound HOV facility was removed and the northbound facility was open. The practical effects of these adjustments are as follows, with the first two relating to the existing southbound HOV facility, and the third to the proposed northbound HOV facility: • Southbound to westbound right turn movement on Interurban Avenue (- 11 vph) • Southbound through movement on Interurban Avenue (+ 11 vph) • Northbound to westbound left turn movement on Interurban Avenue (- 71 vph) The level of service analyses for this project assumed the first two traffic adjustments above to be part of the baseline conditions for the existing channelization, and all three to be in effect with future channelization scenarios. Entranco 13 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER Level of Service Summary Level of service analyses were conducted for the four project intersections noted above for the following 3 scenarios: • Volumes with existing channelization. • Volumes (without project) with the channelization revisions currently under design by the City of Tukwila. • Volumes with project and with the channelization revisions currently under design by the City of Tukwila Level of service analyses were calculated for both existing and 2010 volumes. Project trips remain unchanged between existing and 2010 as the trip generation for existing volumes assumed full build out of the project. The level of service analyses for existing and 2010 are summarized in Table 5. The current City of Tukwila standard for intersections along this segment of Interurban Avenue South is LOS E, or better. This standard is not violated by the Starfire Sports Center project under existing conditions. Only one of the study intersections under existing conditions would be at LOS E (for the third scenario), and the rest would be at LOS D or better for all scenarios. By 2010, however, two intersections in each scenario would be at LOS E, and one would be at LOS F in all scenarios, as a result of the increases in background traffic. In fact, the 2010 LOS calculated for each of the intersections is the same for every scenario (i.e. with or without the project), including the one intersection at LOS A. PARKING ANALYSIS Existing Parking Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. About 50 of these would serve as daily parking for Starfire Sports Center staff and game officials, leaving about 400 spaces for participants and spectators. Parking Demand The peak parking demand for the Starfire Sports Center will occur when both a local soccer tournament and a local softball tournament take place at the same time, and all fields are in use. Table 3 previously summarized the trip generation anticipated for the center under those conditions. The peak period parking demand for this scenario is estimated to be the difference between entering and exiting traffic, or about 180 spaces. However, there are two other factors to consider. One is that the cycle time on most of the fields is between one and two hours, so the maximum parking needed could be twice the hourly need, or about 360 spaces. The second is that there will be some residual parking needed after each game to accommodate things such as team meetings, coaches' talks, and participants and fans that might stay for Entranco 14 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA } cc a 2 5 co w U_ > cc w N LL 0 J w w J 2010 PM Peak Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and Project Trips Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 8.5 Signal E 65.8 Signal E 67.2 Signal F 109.8 1. Signal = signalized intersection. 2. LOS is the level of service, a concept based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 3. Delay, measured in seconds per vehicle, is the average of all the control delay experienced for all the movements of a signalized Intersection. At unsignalized intersections, the reported delay is for only one movement, the movement experiencing the Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Tri s Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 8.3 Signal E 58.1 Signal E 58.2 Signal F 80.7 Existing Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Tri s Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 8.3 Signal E 56 Signal E 62.1 Signal F 80.7 Existng PM Peak Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and Project Tri • s Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Signal A 7.5 Signal D 42.5 Signal D 50.0 Signal E 74.2 Future Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Trips Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Q To c m 65 v co 0 T c 0) Signal D 48.5 Signal D 52.9 ,Existing Channelization with HOV Reductions and No Project Trips Control Delay Type' LOS2 (sec)3 Q Ws c c _' Signal C 33.9 Signal D 49.5 rn N to 0 TO c 0_7 Intersection 158th Ave S / Interurban Ave S SR405 (Fort Dent Way) / Interurban Ave S Southcenter Blvd (SW Grady Way) / Interurban Ave S West Valley Hwy/ 1 -405 NB Ramps (S 156th St) 15 STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER some or all of a following game. This latter demand has been estimated at another 90 spaces, for an approximate maximum demand of 450 spaces. This would indicate that for these occasional occurrences, staff and game officials may need to park in special areas, or other parking management techniques be applied as described below. The traffic analysis assumed games started simultaneously on all outdoor fields to evaluate a worst case condition. However, start times could be staggered in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand. It is anticipated that the highest demand for the bleacher seating around Field No. 1 on a regular basis would likely be for high school games that would attract perhaps 400 -500 fans and participants, and require 270 -330 parking spaces (assuming a 1.5 average car occupancy for attendees). Peak parking demand for bleacher seating should coincide with a decline in other parking demands, but there is a chance that residual parking may already be occupying a portion of the remaining 70 -130 spaces and some contingency parking may occasionally be needed. it is also likely that there will be infrequent events where most of the 1600 -1800 bleacher seats are used. In this case, the 400 spaces available would certainly be inadequate, and contingency parking would be required. Contingency Parking As noted above there are a few events that could require some measure of contingency parking. There are a number of flat, open areas around the park that could be configured for small amounts of temporary overflow parking, if needed for tournaments or high school games. If additional parking is needed, a number of options are available. For example, the park sits adjacent to a number of commercial properties that have a large number of paved parking spaces that could serve as shared parking on the weekend or in the evening. Southcenter Mall is also located nearby, and parking there could be combined with a shuttle system to move people to the park for large events. Although Southcenter Mall is a retail use and parking is utilized over more of the day, large events at the park can be timed to avoid peak shopping periods. In return, Starfire Sport Center could actively encourage participants to patronize local retailers. Options for contingency parking will need to be pursued by Starfire Sports Center and Starfire Sports will implement parking management procedures when necessary at the facility. These procedures may include actions that have been used at other soccer tournament venues in the Seattle area including the Rainier Showcase event at the FC Royals field in Puyallup, and the Emerald City Diadora Cup at 60 Acres Park in Redmond. These procedures may include fees for parking, off-site parking with regular shuttle service, and clear communication of parking situation and options in all participant applications and flyers, including multiple route directions to the park to encourage balanced traffic flow. Several area hotels have expressed an interest in partnering with Starfire Sports to provide housing and transportation for participants that would reduce traffic impacts and parking demand. Several hotels are also well within walking distance of the park utilizing existing and proposed trail facilities. Entranco 16 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER SUMMARY Project Traffic • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 370 gross vehicle trips in the p.m. peak hour under worst case conditions. • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 260 gross vehicle trips in the p.m. peak hour under average conditions. • Starfire Sports Center will generate approximately 250 net new vehicle trips under average conditions, compared to prior uses of Fort Dent Park. • Starfire Sports Center traffic alone will not cause the level of service (LOS) of any intersection on Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway to fall below the City of Tukwila standard of LOS E under existing or 2010 conditions. • One intersection (West Valley Highway at the 1 -405 NB off- and on- ramps) will be at LOS F in 2010, with or without project traffic. However, this intersection is being shown in the City's 2020 modeling as being improved by relocating the NB 1 -405 on -ramp to connect with a new extension of Tukwila Parkway between Andover Park East and West Valley Highway. This change; if it occurs, would eliminate the current high volume of NB left turns (and also SB right turns), and should improve operations substantially. Project Parking • The approximately 450 existing parking spaces at Fort Dent Park should accommodate all of the proposed day -to -day Starfire Sports Center activities. • There will be some events that could require additional parking or proactive parking management in order to accommodate demand. Events that could trigger this need include key high school matches, other stadium events, and large, local concurrent soccer and softball tournaments. • Contingency options for parking management and additional parking spaces are available, and will be secured by Starfire Sports Center, as necessary. Entranco 17 April 29, 2003 Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX A • TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour -:' .:::.. 20% Single Occupancy Arrivals 60% Single Occupancy Arrivals 1 Worst case for weekday PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 0% Bus 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour ,0 N r' 0) C ■-. 1- 03 i, Ul N • . 0) .1. N CD 1, 1.0 r.-- 0 C0 . ., C V to ,f) h o co co a 0) Nocr,oma , . . , Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) co (0 •-• rs (0 .- r.- (0 .- .:: . . •.• 6 (0 f..6 •....'' s!. Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour .- co /- r- co o T- to .1.• r- o co o 1- CV to ... tO r- o co r'' Lo 2 r-- 0 co 0 co a _ea lr, , O0)•0 0) o CL "0 CL 0 T0 Ci 2 1 u.) 03 0, N 357 o to " • 0 ID CV v- CO , 0 CD 0 CV .- CO , 0 CD c, N • :,:: tt 0 0 CD 0 , g 0 N o - o t miowco X 0 , o° o (Do co , o cn o to (DI- , o o) cs, 'Do w o cn o (s, 14: • 15 Cn .s m 0 . . n 13 .0 ,NC---- it g — it 01. NIL-0 01N ONO Ch Non- M v cvor-o - :Cr 00) . ._ t f.2 >, a) nav a a).!„ 0 x nj to - a, 0 C cr) - co csi 0 un 0 CV 00) 0 .- co 512 0 (0 CV V oicno - - co 0 to 0 (0 CJ t cvrvcn .- c`, 0 0 troc.lcurpom° to .- ..- 0 '," ,gr .r.. Fort Dent Park Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 TABLE STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER PM F PM Peak Hour Soccer Fields Trip Gel ir) 0 o ci co 'r o ° co co o 0 csi 0 0 `r- ..- t ° 0 CV :t4 CO c0 Lo "6 - o -0 E - n IL Z or r- - N IL- .- N N 1--- - cm cv r- - co or h 0 - . Hours of Use 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - Bpm 8pm -12am 5pm - Bpm 5.m - 6:30.m U E,„EEE a , a. a • co 0) , co ' • ' c" E E E sts E a 0. so 0., • 111 0) t11 co -2 Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday W eekda Weekday Fri /Sat Weekday Weekday W eekda Field Type Player Type Calendar Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) Nov - Jan Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) Feb -Mar 4 1— o 1— Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Grass Fields Adult A r - May TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Au9 TOT AL Page 2 of 3 ABLE A -1 PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION rip Generation Summary by Time of Year Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 0 co ico I_ Adult Assumptions: 12 Players / Game 0.25 Spectators / Player at games 50% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 10% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Refrees and Starfire Staff arrive and leave outside of PM Peak Hour Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour ' o %. Average 9 Occupancy Car (ACO) 0 O)@ N :N: wi: 0;. N; j i!! 0 d 0 0) al a a d o 0 0 124 V' iF '0 ip Y V co Zr, .- d d a o w a a 0 0 I' m. #C, ro itt o R .0 E O) d � 0 z ) v a LL 0 o -4 . iii, vic > v. -o p co O 0 o N x > w E 0 0 co co 0 0 rn Ty LL z v v vise. .• Hours of Use 5pm- 6:OOpm Ei o o; rni E! 10! to E Off, o; oi; E a Weekday Weekda Field Type Player Type Calendar Softball Fields Adult Sept - Jan TOTAL 'Softball Fields Adult Feb - May 0 Fort Dent Park Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 TABLE A -1 Z 0 Q CC w w O. CC I— CC 0 w co Q W J a -' s 0 LL } cc 1 z a w U N H Z CC 0 O 0. cc Li/ CC CC La CO Mr V/ 0 2 w cc co .Z6 C N Y ~ O U a LO 1"... Total Inl Car Tri PM Peal cm oo C o Average Occupancy Car (ACO) 8.. N r V- N X Total Ci Genen PM Pea c0 X U N 1 -. U LL Soccer Fields Baseball Fields AMH 5/1/2003 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Summary Tables \FINAL Sports Trip Gen.xls \PM Peak - Summary Fort Dent Park "6 a) co a. Entranco Project No. 1 -10- 03011 -60 TABLE A -2 P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreational Community Center G CO CD N < N M N N M CO T 1 T 0 1000 SF GFA N 10 O) Recreational Community Center Total new trips C C i 2 47 .Y CO 12 l0 3 N G O w a• - O .0 E .. 3 G 0 _N -a G G CO O' N) ii N i y c0 C 'a c)N G N N a 0 o Ti 0. L' t Y C � 3 0 o N O G Q N 0) U o E o } 3 tr C C O 7 E (+ N yl0 C N !0 E a1 O 00 -0 ` G R � R E w G N L E a1 � ^ t O) 0 3 LL 0 N y0.. O W U G Zip N CO C O L. E`x E U> 40 ` 0 O 0 R N 2 43 43 0 C cc a t P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park Generation Rate R `0 0 CO N QN (0 CO LO In O 0 O rn O 0 y O U Q to V Regional Park Total new trips STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX B • SYNCHRO PRINTOUTS Entranco Bellevue, WA February 4, 2003 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak _vement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) :•,. Total Lost time (s)_ Lane UtiI. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Perri-fitted - Satd. Flow (perm) -► 7 f 4 & 4\ Etilliient7STARIEgetWEINAWIBTALWAIN01 4 _ r 4► 1900 _ 1900 1900 1900 1900 .1900- 1900 4.0 4.0 ..1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.93 0.95 1.00 0.98 1787 1583 1711 0.76 1.00 __ 0.90. 1423 1583 1580 4.0 4.0 volume (vph) 72 0 . 49 1 0 1 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0 92 Adj. Flow (vph) 78 0 53 1 0 1 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 53 0 2 0 0% 0% Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1 % Turn Type Perm Protected. Phases _ _ Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s)'. Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio___ Clearance Time (s) ;UehiCle- Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) Vs Rafio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v /c`Ratio _ _ Uniform Delay, d1 ,Progression Factor ' Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach Delay (s): __ Approach LOS 1ntersechon S_umrnary 1% 2% 2% custom Perm 4. 45 9.2 15.5 9.2 15.5 014 :0.24., 4.0 -3.0 206 386 9.2 9.2 0.14 4.0 30' 229 c0.05 c0.03 0.00 038 0.14 0.01" 24.6 18.8 23.2 • 1.00 0.0 23.0 3 C 100 ; 1.00 1-2 0.2. 25.7 18.99 C B- 230= c torriONKASIDJAIN$B7MitsWalt IIVEVNIMMEMIONIMMI 1'A fl+ 1900 1900• 1900-,1-1900: 1900> 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 - 1.00 .0.95- ,- 1.00 1.00 1._00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0 0. 95 . 100' 1770 3531 1641 3507 0.95 1.00 0 95 T1 00 1770 3531 1641 3507 12 968 . 15 ` 5_... 575 :_ -24 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 13 1052 • 16- 5 625 26 13 1068 0 5 651 0. 2% 2% 2% .10%7-72%7 `10% Prot 2.3- 41.3 2.3 41.3 0 04- 065 0:02,:-;" 0.63 - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3 0 3.0 _. , ..3 :6 ;!713.0 .: 64 2297 26 2209 001 : c030 0-6-'::::,-61197.7.' 020. - 0,46 y 0.19 029 ` 29.7 5.6 30.9 5.3 1.00 1.00 100 1`00'r 1.6 0.1 3.6 0.1 313 57 344 a _54. :. C A C A 6.0 56si' A A Prot 1 .0 7,7 40_0 ,^. 1.0 40.0 HCM Average Control Delay 7.1 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume.to Capacity ratio 0.39 _ - , Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.5 Sum of-lost-time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.3Y? _%° ICU_Leve_ l of SerGice_ c Critical Lane Group R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak - vement EBL EBT EMIRM31 INBT BR SE�SE3T� EAINNWL�NVIItT NWR Lane Configurations 4 _ r ►j 'p_ ' tt V 'I 1.j, Ideal Flow.(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4 -0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util: Factor 1.00 .1.00 1.00: • 1,00: 1.00 0.95 1.00: - .1.00 • •0.95 " Fri- 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 100 0.85 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected. • 0.96. 1.00 0.95 _ 100 - -0•9-5-'-'71.0-0 , 1.00 0.95'- - 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1717 1524 1687 1639 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 Flt Permitted 0.96 1.00 0 95 ' 1.00 ^ ' 0.95, ' :1 00 1.00 0.95 .. 1.00 Said. -Flow (perm) 1717 1524 1687 1639 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj.-Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) • Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 59. 8 389 98 30 32 14 906 61 475 770 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 -92 0.92 64 9 423 • •107 33 35 15 ._ 985 66 516 837 0 73 423 107 68 0 15 985 66 516 887 6% - 6% . 6% ` 7% 7 %. 7% _ .5% - .- 5% •% 4 %- . 4% 46 0.92 • 50 0 4% Split custom Split Prot custom Prot 2 2 6 6 ---7- .'.:._ 4:,,_. _. 3 2 23 6 42 107 58.3 12.8 12.8 2.6 402 50.9 43.6 .61:2 • 10.7 58.3 12.8 12.8 2.6 40.2 50.9 43.6 81.2 009 0.47 0.10 1" 0 10_ _ 0 -02' -'. 0.33 .: 041 - 0.35_7-.0.66 :. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0.. Y.0"..7:.. 3-0.*.:--- 7 .0:. ,'3.0,'•:x.; ,... 3.0'...: 3.0 • 149 721 175 170 _ 36 1121 635 614 2267 - 0.04 00.06: 0.04 _ 0.01 , "C6297 i.. 00.30 026 c0.28 0.04 0 49 0 59 • 0 61- !- 0.40 , `_. _ --- _ -642 _ -0.88' 0.10 0.84_": 0..39 53.7 23.7 52.9 51.7 59 -6 392 22.2 36.6 9.7 1 00 - 1.00 100 • , 1 0012. ` `too; 1.00 T 1766- 100 .:. 1.00 ^ - 2.5 1.2 6.2 1.5 7.6 8.0 0.1 10.1 0.1 56.2 2.4.9 59.1' • 53.2 T. 67:27° . 47.3' {•: 22.3 46.7' ' 9.8 -._ E C E D E D C D A 29.5 : _. 568__ ... ^46.0: 23.4 • C_ E --- _....._.p..._. ..__. C otersectton ummary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio _ _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization . • c Critical Lane Group 33.9 HCM Level of Service C an • -1.,.-4- iw• -, ;, •_. _ ‘- • 123.3 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 78.4% -T-., . ICU Levefof Service • Ctc w R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMR Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak Movement EBL E-B,T ®AILWAl W.,BlT W:Beff6lBl2 tIR NMEMEL SER SEfi2 Lane Configurations ►j �� Ideal Flow (vphpl). 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane.UtiI. Factor '. 1.00 0.95 'Fit __ • - 1.00 1.00 Fit Protected - 0 95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3505 _ Fit Permitted' - - 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 Volume (vph); 154 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Adt Flow (vph) 167 Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 Heavy Vehides ( %). - 3% 1900 1900, " 1900 1900-- 1900 1900' 1900 :1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 - : 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00; _1.00".. 088 's. 1.00` 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.95 1 00 ' 1.00 ' :0_95_ 0.95 100 ._ 1:).p. _ '7-too::' 1.00 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 _2682 1524 1.00- 0.95 1.00 ..... .100 `- :0.95 .0.95 1,00=-'x0.95 :, 1.00, - 1.00 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 729 161 . 305 770, 607 , 178 568. 486• 244 659' 130 0 92 0 92 0 -92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0 -92 0 -92 792 175 332 837 660 • _193 617 -5287 2657 716 141r 792 175 332 837 660 193 617 528 265 716 141 3% 3% 1% 1% . 1% - 5% 5% 5% 6 %0•:. 6% 6% Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases "Actuated Green G(s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated -gib Rano • Clearance Time (s) vehicle €xte`nsion (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) Ws_ Ratio Prot,,.'; , v/s Ratio Perm v /cRatwr`', Uniform Delay, d1 _ P(O9ression Factor" Incremental Delay, d2 Delay.(s)'J? Level of Service Approach: Delay (s) T, Approach LOS interseCtton unwary Prot 7 pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom 4 5 3 8 - 5 2 4 81 23 _ 67 11 4 24.7 39 0 16.1 29.4 45 4 .14 3 24 4_' _40.5 i 6 0 `�' 261 37.5 11.4 24.7 39.0 16.1 29.4 45.4 14.3 24.4 40.5 v4 16.0 26.1 37.5 0 12 0 25. 040 0 17 030; ' ,0, 47 . 615 025 042' 016,_ . 027.. 0.39 40 40 40 40 40 4.0 40 40 4 -0 3.0. 3.0 3.0 30. 3.0 3.0 30 3'01-7 205 891 629 296 1081 747 253 837 641 280 720 588 • 0 10 0.23 _ 004. c0 19,,'_ 023 `_ 0.11 :' 0.19 . ' c0 16 ` c0 7 - • 0.07 c0.41 0.34 0.09 0.81 0.89 028' '1 ' • 0.77. 088: 0 76 0.74 : 0.82'K'0.951.170.-9-9-7-- 41.9 34.9 19.6 40.6 30.9 23.5 39.8 33.5 25.2 40.2 35.5 20.2 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 : . .1.00 1.00 1 00 1 00,.,_ 1 • 00'' 1.00 214 107 02 892 35 120 128 34 8.4 39 -1 32.0 0.2 19.9 1297 34.4 35.5 52.6_ _36,9 33.6 79.3 67 4 20.4 B F C D D D C E E C 52 1 37.9 • 64 .3, . b. D _.. .._ _.. _..E 632 457_ E D 44.3 D HCM Average Control Delay 17.1CMVo1uume t Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilisation c Critical Lane Group 49.5 HCM Level of Service 0.92 97.2 Sum of lost time (s) 96.3% . ICU Level of Service .: R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak Movement Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane _ Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) BL�EBTj�EBR c t t ti 1 d wegityvimmicammenoitiem343-migtairg3Tratig-atit r - 4 r T ?_.. i! 'i T? r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 4 -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 .. 1.00' 1.00 :.' 0.95 ' 1.00- 1.00 0.95 , - 1.00.' 1 -00 1 -00 0 -85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0 -95 1.00 1.00 0.97_ 1.00 0.95_,, 1.00- 1.00_ , 0.95 - 1.00 ...1.0_0 1719 1810 1538 1842 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 0.75 1.00 .1 .00 0 90 1.00 . 095 1.00 ' 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1348 1810 1538 1711 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Volume (vph): - • 310 9 _. 377 11. 6; �' 14 491 11' 47 1005_ 260 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 -92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 -92 Adj. Flow (vph) , 337. 10 410 12 . 7 • ; 15 534 . 1057 12. 51 1092 283 Lane G roup Flow 337 10 410 0 19 15 534 1057 12 51 1092 283 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 5% 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2 %, 4% 4 %' ..4k„ Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom Protected Phases : 3 4 7 5 2: 1 Permitted_ Phases Actuated Green, G (sj' Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio _ Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 430 577 987 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 ' v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 -•- 0.27 y /cRatat io 0.78 0.02* '0.42 • _ Uniform Delay, d1 44 2 33 3 12 5 Progiession Factor 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.0 0.3 Delay (s) _ 53.2- 33.3 12.8 Level of Service D C B `T proach Delay s _ qpp--- -- ° -- - y()"_ ..._.__.� 31.1 Approach LOS C 35 71 _ . 2 455 455 91.6_.' ' 45,5'.,56.8` 421 78.0 78.0 "" 73 45 -5 45 -5 91.6 45.5 56.8 42.1 78 0 78.0 7 -3 0.32'_ 0.32. 064 - . 0 32 0.40., . 029 ` • 0.55 • 0 55 0.05 40 40 40 40 4.0 40 40 3.0__ _ 30 3.0' : 3.0 3.0 545 642 522 1933 865 89 1050 1008 c0.30 . 0.30 0.03'- . c0.31 ': , 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.03' ,- 0.02`° .102 -_055 0.01- 0.57- 1.04'- 028' • • 335 261 50.4 210 148 662 49 -8 10.7 1.00x' 1.00- 100' -100' - 1.00 100 1.00-. • 100. 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.3 0.0 8.6 38.7 0.2 33.5'T_ 26. - -- 9577: 21.3 14.8 - 74.9 88.5 10.9 _' C C F C. B E F B 30--3,-.7.. ;. 46.0 -` 726- C D -- nterseetion um_mary 63 43.2 ` 92.7 " ' 43.2 92.7 030 <' - 0.65 4 -0 3.0 HCM Average Control Delay 52.9 HCM Level of Service HCMNotumeto_Capacityratio _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization - 95.1 %•,. . ICU Level of Service-' ' E7 c Critical Lane Group R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak _• 7 f ~ t 4\ t MovementEBL eaiT EBR iWY BtfinW BtT Omit NMPffEtT.�a NBR _SBL SB1T ti Lane Configurations 4 r 4 /1 4� ►f _ +T. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 _ • 1900 1900 ' -1900 19.00 1900' 1900" ^1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util Factor . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0:95 1,00 _. 0 95 Frt 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt-Protected 0.95 1.00 0 98 0 95 --• - .. 0, 1.00 ._ J 0.95. 1.00. Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 _ 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3507 FIt Permitted ' 0.76 1.00 _ 0.90 ; " 695 1.00 , 0 95 1.00 'Satd Flow (perm) 1423 1583 1581 1770 3531 1641 3507 Volume(vph) -' 83 01._ 56_ 1 : 0 1 _ _24 1112 17 6..„_: 661 - 28 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Act Flow {vph):` _ 90_ 0 61- .1 0_ ' ~ 26 .1209 ..18• _ .7 718`. : 30.;. Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 90 61 0 2 0 26 1227 0 7 748 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) . ' 1% 1% 2%... 2% 0 %• 0% - 2%' 2%" •2%-- • 10 %' ' 2% "- • 10 %= Turn Type Perm custom Perm Prot Prot • Protected :Phases, _ 4 8 5 2 .' 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 5 Actuated Green, G (4:- • ..9.6 _ 1.9.7. '. Effective Green, g (s) _ 9.6 19.7 Actuated C Ratio _' . ~ 0.15 0.31..1_ Clearance Time (s) 4 0 Vehicle: Ectension (s) 3 0' • Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 490 v /s-FatioProt _.__ v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.12' 7 Uniform Dela y, dt 24.5 15.8 Progression Factor' _ - _ 1.00 " ';1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.1 Delaya(s) _ 25.8 15.9 Level of Service C 6 Approach Delay (s),. _.. 21.8 _ • .23.0 Approach LOS C C 96 61 , -4_ 1.0 10 0 :: 359 9.6 6.1 41.0 1.0 35.9` 15 010 _ _ 064 __ 0.02', -0 56,_ 4.0 40 40 4.0 40~ 30 ' 3.0T- 3.0 3.0' 239 170 2276 26 1980 0.00 - 0.01- 23.0 1 00' 0.0 23.0 C ntersection ummary 0 01 c0 35 000 ' cO.21 0.15' 054, 027 038 ' 26.4 6.2 30.9 7.7 A A HCM Average Control Delay 8.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52 _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.6 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity. Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service A _ 12.0 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 1 Entranbe15 -FF51 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak hAoyement -EBL EBTOKEBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor; ,Fn_ Flt. Protected Flow (prof) FltP.ermitted: Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph)= Lane Group Flow (vph) HeavyVehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases ;Actuated Green, G (s):- - _ Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) ■/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ra'tio ' Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2_ _ belay {s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Int er?rebon ummary 4 1900. 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00- "1:00'' 1.00 085 0.96 100 1717 1524 0.96 1, -00 1717 1524 • .68 447 :. - 0.92 0.92 0.92 -74 10_..x: 0 84 486 .6% 6% 6 %- -1j migim IT W,BamoingetimER tome NW1T N1N,R r 1900 .1900 19004 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00:F' 1.00 0.95 1.00 1- 00 1 00 0 93 1 00 1.00 0.85 1 -00 0.95 1.009, 0.95 1.00 •. 1.00 0• .95 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 0.95. 100:, - ',0.00;-... 1.00 1.00 0• .95 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 3442 113' " 40' 37 16 1041: 70 600 885 53 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 123 43F .40 -• 17. 1132 - 76 _ 6521 962 58 123 83 0 17 1132 76 652 1020 0 -7% - 7 %:. -. 7% ,. 5% 5'/0 - 53/0 . .'4% •4% Prot custom Prot 1900 4.0 0.95 0 -99 1- 00- 3442 - 1900 Split custom Split • 2 2 6 6^ 7 - - - 4 3 - -- 9 2 2 3 6 42 12.0 `60.7 14.2 142 •- 26 - 39.2 2 512 "44.7 813 • 120 60.7 142 142 2.6 392 512 44.7 81.3 0.107 0.48.0.11 0 11: -- _ , 0.02 0.31 " 0.41' 0 35 0.64 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0- '3.0 3.0 -_7 _30'.' - 3.0• :%'i: -,_ 30`,- 3707 - 163 734 190 185 35 1069 624 615 2219 :: 0.05 c0.07 0.95-7.- " 0.017._ c0.33 . '., W.38' 0.30 c0.32 -652-T-0 045 . 54.3 24.9 53.6 52.3 1 00'-'71 00 ,1 .00 ' 1.00 2.7 2.3 7.4 1.7 57.0 .; 27.1 60.9 54 0' - - E - C E.. D _ -61.5, .. _ 0.05 - -049 _ 106. 0.12' >T1.06 046 61.1 43.4 _ 23.4 40.7 11.3 • 1.00 1.00 .1.00 100 1,00 • . 10.2 44.5 0.1 53.3 0.2 71.3 880 :, 23.5 _ 9• 4.0` F B 43.5. 58.1: 83.8 E F D HCM Average Control Delay HCMfvolume io Capacity_ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) intersection Capacity Utilization• c Critical Lane Group 56.0 HCM Level of Service o.04 -77.7 126.1 Sum of lost time (s) 969 %7 ' _ICU Level of Service R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak _ovement EBL EBT EBR WBL UV,B;T$W,BR 012 E NBta SEialSER SE)32 Lane Configurations ►f T? r 1 44 r ►f ' r ►f er p tdealFlow(vphpl) _ `1900 1900. 1900 1900k, 1900' 1900 1900 1900 ._1900 1900 1900, 1900 Total Lost time (s) _ 4.0 40 40 4.0 40 40 40 40 40 4.0 4.0 40 Lane UUI_. Factor .' . 1.00. 0.95 - . t`.00 1.00 0,95 . - 1.00 1.00 . 0;97, 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 00 0.85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1.00 0 85 0 85 Fit Protected 0 95 1 00 1 00 0 95 1.00 .7 1.00 0.95" 0.95 1.00 0.95 - 1 00 1 00 Satd. Flow (prof) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 _ 1524 Flt"Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 100 0.95 0.95 1.00, `0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 volume (vph) 177 838 ' 185 350 885 '698' , _24 711 , 558 • 280 757 • 250 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0 -92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 • Astf_Flow (vph) . 192 911 201 380 962. 759. • . 26 773 607. 304 823. 272-..- Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 911 201 380 962 759 26 773 607 304 823 272 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3 %. 1% . 1 % .:. ` .. 1 %. . 5% ' 5% 5% 6 %. 6% 6% Turn Type Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom RrotectedPhases .'7 4 5 3 g 5 _.2 1.,_, .6 Permitted Phases 4 8 1 2 3 6 7 Actuated Green, G (s) , 17,1 33.0 42.3 27.0 42.9 . 65.9 . 9.3 31.0 58.0 . 23.0' 44.7 61.8 Effective Green, g (s) 17 1 33 0 42 3 27 0 42.9 65.9 9 3 31.0 58 0 23.0 44 7 61.8 Actuatedg/C Ratio, ` _ 013 025. 033 021 033 .,0.51 0_07 024._'0.45 - 0.18., -034 0.48 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ye-hide Extension (s) 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0' • 3.0 • 3.0* '3.0 ?.y - 3 0 3 0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 230 890 510 371 1179 811 123 795 686 301 922 v /s -Ratio Prof . ... 011 .c0 26,z 003 c0.21 0.27 ' , 0.02 c0.23 . ? .. - c0.18". 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 c0.47 0.39 v / c Ratio ' 083 1.02 0 39 1.02: 0.82 , 0.94 0.21 0 97 0.88.: 1.01 ' 0.89 Uniform Delay, d1 55 1 48 5 33 9 51 5 39 9 30.1 56 9 49.1 32 9 53.5 40.4 Prog ression Factor _ 1 00 .1.00 100 • 1.00- 1.00 ,:100 `- 1.00 '1.00 1.00 ' .100... 1.00 Incremental Delay,_d2 22 -2 36 3 0.5 53.1 4 5 17.8 0 9 25.1 13 0 54 -4 10.9 Delay- (s) ,_ _. _ - -. 77.2 • 84,8 ' 34.4 104 6. : 44.4 47 9 57.8 `' 742 f ::46.-671-07.91...":.51 3. _ Level of Service E F C F D D E E D F 0 C ApproachDelay(s)_ , 75.9 565. . 61.7:_ -_ 579.. . . - Approach LOS E E E E MI _"''''15a Unary 724 0.18 038 21.8 1 00' 0.3 HCM Average Control Delay HCM'sUolue •to Capacity ratio . _ Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection; Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 62.1 HCM Level of Service 130.0 Sum of lost time (s) x10.4 %r - ICU Level of Service 12.0 • T . R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro \Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 3 Entranbel5 -FF51 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Existing Condition Timing Plan: PM Peak 7 { t- t 1 t P ti 1 r Movement EBL EBi_ EBR WBL W,BT WB -R NBL NOT NB SBi SB11 SBR Lane Configurations 1 ? r 4 r ii ff r ►f i+ r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 . 1900 1900 1900 ' 1900'. :1900 1900 ;.1900 -_ 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 -0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 •- 1.00 1.00^ + 0.95 - 1.00. Frt 1.00 1 00 0 85 1 00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1.00 1 00 0.85 0 Flt Protected ' .95 1.00 1.00, 0-9.77.-.. 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 . 0.95 1.0 too- 00 Satd. Flow (prot) _ 1719 1810 1538 1841 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Flt Permitted 0.74-- 1.00 1.00 0 89 1.00 0.95 1 00 1.00 0.95 .` 1.00 1.00 . . Satd. Flow (perm) 1344 1810 1538 1698 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 Volume (vph) _ . 356 10;:.. 433 13 7 • 16 564- 1117. . 13 54 1155, _ 299 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 . 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 . pd} Flow (vph); . 387 11 • 471 14 8 .17 613 1214 14 59' • 1255 -. 325 Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 11 471 0 22 17 613 1214 14 59 1255 325 Heavy Vehicles ( %) ' 5% 5% .5% 0% 0%' -' 0% 2 %' ' 2%- 2% 4% .. 4 %. • 4% Tum Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot custom Protected Phases. .. -- 3. -.__ 4,._ 7_._ 5 _ • Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 2 6 3 • Actuated Green, G (s)_ _:: 475, ._ 47,5:‘,.. 90.6 _ 47.5.7. 59.0 39.1 • ' 753 75.8 7;5 44.2 951 Effective Green, g (s) 47.5 47.5 90.6 47.5 59.0 39.1 75.8 75.8 7.5 44.2 95.7 Actuated g/C Ratio • -7-0-33.--0.33'1 _ .0.65... 033 .. 0.41_ _0,27 , 0.53 053 005. 0 31_ 0.67. Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3,0 3.0' -.3.0 • • 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0'-.. • 3.o: ` "': - Lane Grp Cap(vph) 447 602 976 565 667 485 1879 840 91 1074 1041 v/s Ratio Prot .::.. _ _ _ 0.01.... c0.35 0.34 �-.___ __. 0.03�c0.36 v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 0.31 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 v/c Ratio _.. _ _ . .v_ _ ..0, 87 , 0.02 0.48 004 . 0:03 , 1.26 0.65. 0,02 03-8",.:-.i .17. _ 0 31' _ Uniform Delay, di 44.7 32.0 13 8 322 24.9 51 9 23 9 15.9 66.4 49 3 9.8 Progression Factor - , ,1.00:; 1 00. 1.00 1.0d;.... 1 00 1 00; 1.00 1.00. 1A0� T1 00 1.00 • Incremental Delay, d2 15.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 134.5 0.8 0.0 14.8 86.1 0.2 Delay(s),_ _- 606 32.0 14.1 • 322x_ 249_. 186.3 24.7 _ 15.9 • 81.2'..,.. . 4' 100:_._._ Level of Service E C B C C F CB F F A Approach: Decay (s) F - - 35.1 -. 29. o .- 78.4 _ -: _ 10__8 6 Approach LOS D C E F ntersec > urnmary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume i Capaaty ratio.> Actuated Cycle Length (s) Ini_ersection Capaaty'tltilization c Critical Lane Group 80.7 HCM Level of Service 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) - .106.8% ICU Level of Service F 12.0 R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro\Exist Conditions\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 4 Entranbel5 -FF51 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak ! 4 & 1 t /' �► j r Ntovement '$EBL ,. EBT" EBR tNBL', WBT WBR `NBL 4c.'•NBT; NBR 8-81I ISBTp 1581,, ,+ ' Lane Configurations 4 r 4, R fI+ R I. Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1900 1900.. 1900_ • Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtiI. Factor_ 1.00 1 00 t.00 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95` Frt 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.98 ' 0.95 1.00 0.95 100 'Said. Flow (prot) 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3507 ,Flt Permitted 0.76 100 0.90 0.95 1.00 ' 0 95 ' 1.00 atd. Flow (perm) 1423 1583 1580 1770 3531 1641 3507 Volume (vpti) 72 0 ' 49 1 0 . 1... 12 968 15 5 575. 24 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph), 78 0 53 1 ' 0 ' 1 13 1052 16 , 5 625 26 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 53 0 2 0 13 1068 0 5 651 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 1% 1% 2% 2%. 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 10% 2% 10% Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1. Permitted Phases 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) . 9.2 9.2. 9.2 1.0 42.1. Effective Green, g (s) 9.2 9.2 9.2 1.0 42.1 Actuated g/C Ratio • • 0 14 0.14. 0.14 . 0.02 0 65 - Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) ' 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0` 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 204 226 226 28 2312 v/s Ratio Prot ' ' c0.01 c0.30. ' v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.03 0.00 Vic Ratio, •'w 0.38 0.23 ' 6.01 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 24.4 23.6 31.4 Progression Factor 1 00 1.00 , 1.00.. . 1 00' Incremental Delay_, d2 1.2 0.5 0.0 11.7 DTs) _ __ .262 25 0 . 23.7..... 43.1 Level of Service C C C ' roach Dela s 25.7 23.7 .. Approach LOS C C intersection C ummary 0.46 5.5 1.00 5.6 A 6.1 A 1.0 : 42.1 1.0 42.1 0 02 0.65 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 26 2296 0.00. 0.19 0.19 31.3 1.00 3.6 34.8 C HCM Average Control Delay HCM. Volume to. Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 7.1 HCM Level of Service 64.3 Sum of lost time (s) 47 3% ICU.Level of Service 12.0 A R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 4/28/2003 AMH Page 1 Entranbel5 -FF51 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak Movement EB L " EBTMEBR r1?U6 INBTr awBR iSEL rSETi » SERIP NWL NVH>T+ NWR: Lane Configurations Ideal -Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Fri FU Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume_ (vph)' 59 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) • . 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 6% Turn Type Split Protected Phases 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v /cRatio Uniform Delay, dt Progression Factor. Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s): . Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tnteisecti6 1$.umma y 4 r 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 100 100 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 100 0.95 1.00 • 0.95 1717 1524 1687 1648 1719 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 • • 0.95` 1717 1524 1687 1648 1719 8 389 .98 35 32 14 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 • 9 423 107 38 35 15 73 423 107 73 0 15 6% 6% 7% 7% .. 7% 5% custom Split Prot 2 6 6 .. 2 23 6 10.5 429 126 126 28 10.5 429 126 126 28 0 09 0.36 0.10 1 0 10 • 0 02 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30 30 30 30 150 545 177 173 40 004 c0.06 0.04 0.01 c0.28 0.49 • 0 78 060 0 42 0.38 522 343 513 503 57.7 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.5 6.8 5.7 1.7 5.8 54.7 41.1 57.0 52.0 63.6 D D E D E 43.1. • '55 0 D D 1900 4.0 095 1.00 1.00 3438 1.00 3438 906 092 985 985 5% 4 52.5 52.5 0.44 4.0 3.0 1504 c0.29 065 266 1.00 2.2 288 C 28.4 C 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 1538 1736 1.00 0.95 1538 1736 61 404 092 092 66 439 66 439 5% 4% custom Prot 3 42 63.0 63 0 0.52 284 28 4 024 4.0 • 3.0 807_ 411 c025 0.04 0.08 141 1 00 0.0 14.2 B 1.07 45 8 080 55.2 919 F 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 •. 0.99 1.00 3442 1.00 3442 770 46 0.92 0.92 837 50 887 0 4% 4% 78.1 78 1 0.65. 4.0 3.0 2240 0.26 0.40 9.9 0.72 0.3 7.4 A 35.4 D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volu ne to; Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilisation .' c Critical Lane Group 35.4 0.76 120.0 74.1% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 C R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak --► 7 ` ~ 4\ 1 t \* Mrt7 EBLY.,; EBT' '':EBRTFWBL- siWBT " "WBR:JNBl2 + NBL'`..,NBR•c, SEL'.- xSER ^'SER2Y:T�§`.>..,�:.:,,p,..7V, ; Lane Configurations ) T? r 1 tt r ►j �►� I+ pr I+ 'deal Flow (vphpl) ' 1900 ` 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 19.00 1900 1900 "".1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4 -0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00. 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 Fit 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 •Flt Protected . _ 0.95 1.00 1 00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 - 1.00 _ 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 • FltPermitted 0.95 1 00 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 1'.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 00 Said. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Volume (vph), 154 729 .161 305 • 770 607 178 568 486 244 659 130 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. FIow (vph) - 167. 792.' 175 332 837 660 193 617 528 265 716 . 141 • Lane Group Flow (vph) 167 792 175 332 837 660 193 617 528 265 716 141 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 3% 3% 3% 1% • 1% 1% ' 5% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% Turn Type Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom Protected Phases 7 4 5 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 1 2 3 6 7 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.2 28,6, 44 1 23 6 35.6".. _ 57,0. • 15 5 29.8 53 4 22.0 36.3 53.5 Effective Green, g (s) 17.2 28.6 44.1 23.6 35.0 57.0 15.5 29.8 53.4 22.0 36.3 53.5 Actiated g/C Ratio 0.14 024 0 37 0.20 029, 0.48 0.13 025 ..0 44 0.18 0 30 045 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3 0 3 0'` 3.0 ` 3 0 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3 0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 835 576 351 1042 760 222 828 684 312 811 679 v/s Ratio Prot r ., 0.10 c023. ' ; 004 c0.19 023 `' '. 0.11 0:19' _. 0.16 c0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 c0.41 0.34 0.09 v/c Ratio • 0.67 0.95. 030' 0 95 .0.80 0.87 " 0,87 0.75 0.77 • 0.85 0688 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 48.7 45.0 27.0 47.6 39.3 28.1 51 -3 41 6 282 47.4 39.8 20.3 Progression Factor 1.00 100 100 . 1.00; 1.00 • 1.00' 1.00 1.00 '1.00 "0 92. 0.71 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 6.5 19.5 0.3 33.9 4.6 10 -3 28.3 6 0 5 4 16 1 11 4 0.1 Delay (s).•• . , , 5'.. 27.3 81.5 43.9.. . 38.5' 79.5 47.6 33.6 59.8 ' 39 5 14.4 Level of Service E E C F D D E D C E D B 4pproach Delay (s) 57.4. 46 7. 41.2 Approach LOS E D D D nti ersectic" T8ummary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 48.5 0.87 120.0 96.3% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service .• . of °. "�.: }i � �. .u7 L"$r�!s�4.X•k�y't y� D 8.0 E R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak MOV.ernentargaialr Lane Configurations Ideal FIow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1 00 Flt Protected 0 95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 Flt Permitted 0.75 Satd. Flow (perm) 1348 Volurrie (vph) 310 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 337 Lane Group Flow (vph) 337 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 5% Turn Type Perm Protected Phases Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green, G.(s) 45 5 Effective Green, g (s) 45.5 Actuated g/C Ratio .. 0.32 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Lane Grp_Cap (vph) 430 v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.25 *Ratio • 0.78 Uniform Delay, d1 44 2 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9 0 Delay (s) • 53.2 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS )3tersechtclriSummary J • '- `\ t p `► ♦ 4/ EBEF,EBT EBR Wmnil3 ' WBR rvt3t; tVBT NBRt SBL ',SBTat st3R 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1 00 0 85 1.00 100 1810 1538 '1.00 1.00 1810 9 0.92 10 10 5% 4, r 1900 1900 1900 40 40 40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 491 0 92 534 100 085 0.97 1.00 1842 1615 0.90 1.00 1538 1711 1615 377 11 6 14 092 092 092 092 410 12 7 15 410 0 19 15 534 5% 0% 0% 0% 2% custom Prot 7 71 45.5 56.8 42.1 45.5 56.8 42.1 0 32 0.40 0.29 4.0 4.0 3.0 ' 3.0 545 642 522 0330 0.01 0.01 003.0• .02 33 5 26.1 1.0.0 1.00 00 00 33.5 2• 6.2 C C 30.3... C custom Prot 3 4 35 45.5 ` 91.6.: 45 5 91 6 0.32 0.64 4.0 3.0. 577 987 00.1• ' ' 0.27 0.02 0.42 333 125 1'00 1.00. 00 03 33.3 12.8 C B . C 1.02 50 4 1.00 45 3 95.7 F ++ r 1900 1900 40 40 0.95 1.00 1.00 0 85 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1.00 3539 972 0.92 1057 1057 2% 78.0 78 0 0.55 4.0 3.0 1933 0.30 0.55 210 1.00 0.3 21.3' C 46.0 D 1.00 1583 11 0 92 12 12 2% Perm 2 78.0 780 055 4.0 3.0 865 0.01 0.01 148 1.00 00 14.8 40 1.00 • 1.00 095 1736 0.95 1736 47 0.92 51 51 4% Prot 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 100 3471 1553 1 00 1.00 3471 1553 1005 260 0.92 0.92 1092. 283 1092 283 4% 4% custom 1 6 7.3. 73 0.05 4.0 3.0 89 0.03' 0.57 66 2 1.00 86 74.9 • .._ 63 43.2 92.7 43.2 92.7 0.30 065 4.0 3.0 1050 1008 c0.31 1 04 49.8 1.00 38.7 88.5 F 72.6 • E 0.18 028 10.7 1.00 02 109 B HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 52.9 0.95 142.8 95.1% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service- 1 02 ervice 12.0 •'E R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) f 1 6 Moves' a rent EBL EB, EBR tNBL Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util Factor 1.00 . 1.00 71.00 ' :' 095: Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 FIt Protected - 0.95 1.00 0 98 .0.95 _ ,1.00, • Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 4 r 1900 1900 1900 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak WBT WBR NBL 4 1900 1900 1900' mnaNBR S8L SBT SBR 4'4 114 1900 1900_ . 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 Flt Permitted 0.76., 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1423 1583 4.0 f.00- 0.93 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 '0.95 _::' 100 1641 3507 1581 1770 3531 1641 3507 Volume (vph) - , 83 0'. 56 Peak -hour factor, PI-1F 0.92 0 92 0 92 Adj. Flow (vph). . 90 .. 0 _ 67. Lane Group Flow (vph) _ 0 90 61 Heavy,Vehicles( %) 1% 1% 2% Perm Turn Type ProtectedPhases- Permitted Phases ;Actuated Green Effective Green, g (s) Actuated C Raho Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm y/c Ratio , Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor • Incremental Delay, d2 Delay `(s) _. . _ _.. 'Level of Service ' ..roach belay s Approach LOS nterseetton Summary 9.6 0.15 4 -0 • 3 0 . ...... 215 490 custom 1 ` . 0 1 ' 24 1112 17 ` 6 661 28 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 1 ; . 26 1209 18 7 `' 718 30 2 0 26 1227 0 7 748 0 0 %0 , 0 %. 2% - 2° /v 2% 10 %` 2% r ' 10% 0 2%: Perm 45 19,7 19 -7 0.31 c0.06 0.04 042 012 24.5 15.8 1 00 -1'00 : 1.3 0.1 25.8 15.9 C_ B 218 _.. C HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Int_ersechonCapaci y Udtiiat_ion c Critical Lane Group V 8.3 ;0.52•__; 63.6 52.3%_ Prot 96' 6.1; 41.0 9.6 6 1 41 0 0 15 _ _0.10. 064 40 40 40 3.0.. 3.0 3.0 239 170 2276 0 01 c0.35 001 23.0 0.0 23.0 C _ 23.0 ,. C 0.15 0'54 26.4 6.2 / 00 .11 .00 0.4 0.2 26.8 . 6.4 C A 6.8. A HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service _ 12.0 Prot 1.0 . 35.9. 10 359 002' '0.56:.. 4.0 4 -0 3.0 26 1980 000 "c0.21 _ 30.9 7.7 ..100: :tool i. 5.5 0.1 36 5 7.8 • D A 8.1 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 1 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak -+ -4 C F ►L `. 4 '-• \ C� Movem net EBLWEBTT EB1311M3MW,BTNICINAIRFSEL SE7TSER NWL NTviTlNM 4 r ' I. 1 ff r ) 1900 1900. 1900•:, 1900 1.900. .1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00. ,. 1.00 1.00 ... 0.95 1.00 too 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.93 1.00 1 00 0 85 1 00 0:96 1.00 :: 0.95 .. 100 , '. 0.95 100 1.00 0.95 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 0:96 ' 1.00: 0 95' 1.00 0.95 100 100 - 0.95 1717 1524 1687 1647 1719 3438 1538 1736 68 9 447 113 600 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 -92 0 -92 74 10 486. 123 652 0 84 486 123 652 6% 6% .. 6% .7% ^ 4 %. Split custom Split Prot 2 , :2 s:. .. 6 . 3 2 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt FR Protected , •Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted.; Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph)_ v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio' Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor' Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Irrt'e orr um_: 40 37 16 1041 70 0 -92 0 92 0.92 0 92 0 92 '43 40 • 17 1132 76 83 0 17 1132 76 7% 7% 5% 5 %c 5% Prot custom 7 4 • 23 _ 6 42 126 580 15.3_. 153 2.8 54.7 673 41.4 93.3 • 12.6 58.0 15.3 15.3 2.8 54.7 67.3 41.4 93.3 0.09 0.41 0 11 0.11 v 0.02 0.39 0.48 7 V.34- _ 0.67 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 . 3.011 3.0 3.0'_.. 3.0 3.0. 3.0 HCM Average Control Delay HCM,votume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group ti, 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3442 1.00 3442 885 53 0.92 0.92 962' 58 1020 0 4% ' 4% 155 631 184 180 0.05. _.__.c0 :07': 0.05.: c0.32 0.54 0.77 r; +:0.67:; - 0.46' 60.9 35.3 59.9 58.5 1.00 t.00 100 i 00 3.8 5.8 8.9 1.9 64.8 ' 41.0'^ 68.8•' 60.4 E. .. -o..: E _.:.. E 445 65.4 D E 34 1343 739 513 2294 0 01 c0 33 c0.38 0.30 0.05 . . 050 • 0.84 0.10 1.27 0.44 67 - 9 38.7 19.9 49.3 11.1 1 00 i 00 1.00 "0.90" _ 068 11.1 6.6 0.1 127.9 0.2 79.0 453 1.9 9 . 172.47 77 E D B F A 44.2 72.0 D E .. -'z:r ^`- ',fir 58.1 HCM Level of Service 140.0 _ Sum of lost time (s) 90.9% ICU Level of Service' ry. R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak 3 -+ 7 { ~ k or771 EBt_ EM EOTAIRB 01-AW-' EMOBI2 NBL NBR SEL SER)lfSER2 Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util.Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1900 1900 , 1900 1900 _1900. ""_ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4.0 1 00 0 95 1.00 ? . 100 , .. 0.95 100 -1.00 0.97 - 1.00 1.00 088 100 1.00 1.00 0 -85 1 -00 1.00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0.85 1 00 0 85 0.85 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00. too__ 095 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 0.95 1.00 1.00 _ 0.95 1.00' 100 - 0.95 0 95 1.00 0.95 1.00. 1.00 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574- 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 volume (vph) Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) Turn Type Protected. Phases_ Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s)., Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 'v /s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio _, Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s). Approach LOS ni tersect%onT$ummary 177 838' 185 " ' 350 ' ` 885:,` -r 698 24 711 558 280 0 -92 092 092 092 092 092 0.92 092 092 092 192 911 201 ..•380' 962' -759 - '26 773. 304 192 911 201 380 962 759 26 773 607 304 3% 3% 3% 1% .: 1% z, 1 %. 5% 5% 5% 6% Prot pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot 7. 4. 5 3 5. 2 1 4 81 16 0 36.0,' 43.6.. 29.0' 49.0'..• 74.0. ' 7 :6 34.0 16.0 36.0 43.6 29.0 49.0 74.0 7 6 34 0 0.11 0.26. 0.31 .021 . 0 35.:: 0.53 _, 0.05 0.24 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 -0 40 40 40 3.0 3.0 3.0.. ''. 30' '' 30 ' 3.0 23 63.0 63.0 0.45 757 250 0 -92 0 -92 823 272 823 272 6% 6% custom 67 25.0 51.4. -71.4 25 0 51 4 71 4 018 037 -- 0.51 40 4 -0 30 30 200 901 533 370 1251 845 93 810 692 304 985 0.11 c026 . 0 02, c0.1... 0.27= 0.02 Co 23 c0.18 0.31' : 0.11 0.47 0.39 0.18 096 1-.011 038t13 =:077, ' 0.90r; 0.28 ' 0.95 0 .. 88 100 7 0.84 0'35 61.7 52.0 37.6 55.5 40.5 29.6 63.6 52.2 35 -0 57.5 40.4 20.5 100 100 1 :00 ,, 100 ;,:1.00,5,!" -100 ' 'fob - `•' 1.00: 1.00 0 73 0 62 • 0.11 - 52.0 32.7 0.4 53.9 2.9 12.2 1.6 22.3 12.1 42.4 5.8 0.2 113.7 - 84.7. 38.1;....109'4 5; 43.41 . 41;8 .' 65.2. 74.5 47 1 84.2 30.9 24 F F D F D D E_ E D F C 81 8 - - _54 8 c., ,u.:, ..: . "0,577 .. 36.9 - F D E D 777 - .:.cifi'1. HCM Average Control Delay HCM volume. to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection CapacityUtilization c Critical Lane Group 58.2 HCM Level of Service 1.0077.; . _ I . ."," 140.0 Sum of lost time (s) 1-10.4%-." . ICU Level of Service: 16.0 G R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann wo Project Timing Plan: PM Peak Ariduem617 EBL . Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl). 1900, Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane UtiI. Factor ' 1.00 • Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0 95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 Flt Permitted 0.74 Satd. Flow (perm) 1344 Volume (vph) 356 factor, PHF 0 92 Adj. Flow (vph) 387 Lane Group Flow (vph) 387 Heavy Vehicles ( %) 5% Turn Type Perm Protected Phases- Permitted Phases 3 Actuated Green, GAO_ . 47.5 Effective Green, g (s) 47 5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) � 3.0' Lane Grp Cap (vph) 447 v/s Ratio Prot .. v/s Ratio Perm c0.29 v /c Ratio''' 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 Progression Factor 1 00 Incremental Delay, d2 15.9 Delay (a) - 60 6 Level of Service E Approach Detay (s) Approach LOS Intersec4op Summary c t t p ti 1 �EBT4IEBRSIICW13L 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 • 1810 1538 ' 1.00 1810 1538 „ :10 , 433 :.13 092 092 092 11 ,471 14 11 471 0 5% .. 5 %, 0% custom Prot 3 4 35 47:5:,' 90_6; 47 5 90.6 0.33 X063 4.0 - 3 0- ,-...- - 602 976 0.07: 0.31 048__" _ -. .'- 32.0 13.8 1.00 0.0 0.4 35.1 ' D W ritw R oautrA�NBRiggSBL S- iiiisa 4 r ' T'% r ' ff r • 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1100 1.00 1.00- . 0.95, .1 -00 -1.00' 0 95 -1._00 1.00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1.00 1.00 0 85 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 , 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00' 1841 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 0.89 • 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95' 1.00 1 00_ 1698 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 3471 1553 7 16 . 564. 1117. 13 54,; 1155.. 299 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 8: 17 613 1214 14 59 1255 325 22 17 613 1214 14 59 1255 325 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 4% ' 4% 4% custom Prot Perm Prot custom 7 5 2 1. .. 6 71 2 63 - 47 -5 ; 59.0 39.1 75.8 75.8. 7.5 . 44:2- - 47.5 59.0 391 758 758 75 442 957 0 33 _ 041 0.27 053 053 005-- 0.31' 0.67 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 - ••- 30 30 3.0: 30'.. 30 565 667 485 1879 840 91 1074 1041 • c3.35.-7-6:J4 3-03 c0.36 . 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.04 0.03 1.26 0.65 0.02... 0.65 1.17 '' 0.31 32.2 24.9 51.9 23.9 15.9 66.4 49.3 9.8 1.00' 1.00 100. 1.00` 1.00' 1.00" - LOON'_ 1.00 0.0 0.0 134.5 0.8 0.0 14.8 86.1 0.2 • 322 ` 249 ' 186.3 24.7' 15.9" 81.2 .135.4 • 10.0 • - C C F C B F F A 29.0 78.4 108.6;: C E F HCM Average Control Delay HCM_volume to•Capacity_ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Iriterse_ction Capacity Uti_ lization,: c Critical Lane Group 80.7 • r. 1. .09r� . • 142.8 Sum of lost time (s) 106.80 ICU Level of Service HCM Level of Service 12.0 F z. R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann wo Project\2010 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 4/28/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak J _ C~ k 4\ t P Movenertt EBL EBT R WBL FEB elillaW,BRIENBAIFISAIM.B$ SBL S61T SBR Lane Configurations 4 f+ 4 ►f 44. ►+j f, • ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 ....1900 1900. 1900 1900 ' 1900 7 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane'Util Factor, 1 00 1.00 '100_ 1.00 0.95 100 0.95 • Frt 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 1....1..._ _ - 0 95 foci- 07987-- 0.95 17076'. 0.95 1.o Satd. Flow (prot) _ 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3508 Flt Permitted 0.76, 100 0.90 90 __- 0:95 - 1.00' ' 0 95 ,' ,.1.00 . :, Satd. Flow (perm) 1423 1583 1580 1770 3531 1641 3508 Volume (vph) . .72 0 63 1.. 0 : 1:-. 16 : 977... 15 ; . 5, 603 24 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0 -92 0.92 0 92 0.92 692 0 92 0.92 0 92 0.92 6-9-2 0.92 Adj- Flow, (vph). • 78 0 68 1 0 • 1 T7 - 1062"• - 16 .., 5 - • 655` ' 26' Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 78 68 0 2 0 17 1078 0 5 681 0 Heavy. Vehicles (%) 1°‘• 1% 2% 2%. 0% . 0% 2%, '2% 2% . 10% 2%. 10% , Turn Type Protected Phases - -. - Permitted Phases Actuated Green; G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gC Ratio_ Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (') Lane Grp Cap (vph) v%s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.04 v%c Ratw - " - 0.37 029 Uniform Delay, di 24.1 23.9 Progression Factor; _ 1.00 ' 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.7 Delay(s) 25.37 24.6 Level of Service C C Approach Delay (s). 249.. - Approach LOS C oterseetton ummac Perm Perm Perm Prot 5.. 2 4 8 92_:- 9.2 9.2' 1.0 40.5' .. 10 :405 9.2 9.2 9.2 1.0 40.5 1.0 40.5 .0.15 0.15 0.15.-.._ _ 0.02 0.65 002 _ 065 __ 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0'' 209 232 232 28 2281 26 2266 c001 c031 000- -- 0.19 - HCM Average Control Delay .HCM Volume to Capaciy_ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) I ritersection Capacity: Utilization c Critical Lane Group • 0.00 _ 001 0.61 047 - :0.19- - 0.30, 229 30.7 57 305 49 • 100 .100 1.00 1.00. 1.66 0.0 32.0 0.2 3.6 0.1 .229_ 62.6 58 34.0' 5.0:: C E A A 229. 67-: A 7.5 HCM Level of Service 0.46 ..... _. . _ 77- • 62.7 Sum of lost time (s) 47.5% ICU Level of Service , j R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro\PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 5/1 /2003 AMH Page 1 Entranbel5 -FF51 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak -► -4 t 4-- 'k- \.. \ 4) h Movemertt E15 EB31111EBR$WBLMW,B171�W „BT I $EL SET SEt3 NW MA NWR Lane Configurations 4 r ►) .t. �j Tt p vi 11* Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 ..1900 1900' 1.900 1900 •' 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor • 1.00 ' 1.00 ' 1.00 .. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 • 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Fitt Protected 0.98 1 007 :0.95 '......-1.00 . 0.95 ' 1.00 100 • 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1761 1524 1687 1679 - - 1719 1719 3438 1538 1736 3370 FIFPermitted 098 • 1.00- 095 • 1.007 0.95 1.00 1.00; 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1761 1524 1687 1679 1719 3438 1538 1736 3370 _ • _. _.. kr Volume (vph)4j _ 59 107 389 • _ ?'137 79 . 45 56' 906 61 404 770. _ 185, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0 92 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0 92 6-62 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 64 116. 423' . 149 86 ' � 49 - 61 - 985 66 ' '439 837 201:- Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 180 423 149 135 0 61 985 66 439 1038 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) .._ .. _ ; .. ° 6% 6% 6% '.7 %'•••`.• 7 %� ' 7% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% Turn Type Split custom Split Prot Protected Phases 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C: Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/sRatio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental D elay, d2 Delay (s) _ Level of Service Approach'Delay'(s) Approach LOS nterse_etion ummary custom Prot 4' - 3 2 23 6 42 17.8 - -48 6 15.6 • 15 6 . 5`6 43.8 __ 61 -6 26 8 65.0 17.8 48.6 15.6 15.6 5.6 43.8 61.6 26.8 65.0 0.15- 0.40 0.13 013 0.05 0.35• 0.51 022 0.54 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0. 3 0 3 0 . 3.0'. • • 3 0' 3 0 261 617 219 218 80 1255 790 388 1825 0.10 c0.09; 0.08' 004 c0.29 • . c0.25 0 31 c0.28 0.04 0.69 069 ' 068 062' 0.76 078 0.08 1.13 057 . 48.5 29.4 49.8 49.4 56.5 33.9 14.8 4_ 6 .6 18.2 100' 1.00- 100 - _ .' 100 - . 1.00 1:00 -_-..1.-00-_-._ • 080 0.67 74 32 84 52 342 50 00 761 07 -55.9 32.6 .58.2. 54.6; 907 389 • 149 :.1132 12.9 E C .....E D F D B F.._ .. B - _39.5.. '....: 56 5 40 3_ 42.7 D E D -° - -- - D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 42.5 HCM Level of Service 0:83 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 82.8% - ICU. Level of Service D 12.0 R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 2 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak Movement 3 7 C ,EBL LEWINEFAIWR Wt3 NBEIWit d2 .6t3L NBR .SELnSERFSEF,t2 Lane Configurations ideal Flow (vpnpi} Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor • Frt Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph); Peak -hour factor, PHF Adj: Flow (vph) • Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles ( %) tt .r .. +t . r. . �� r • 1900 1900 1900 1900 • 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 • 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 • 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 • 1.00 0.97 1.00 • 1 00 1 00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1.00 • 1 00 0 85 • 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95•. 1.00. •• 1.00' `0.95 0.95 1.00 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 _1719 3335 1538 0.95 1.001 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 154 729 161 305 770 607 178 707 486 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 -92 0 92 0 92 0 92 167• 792 175 332 837 • 660 193 768 528 167 792 175 332 837 660 193 768 528 . 3/ 3 %: 3% 1% 1% 1% 5% •5 % 5 %•_.. pm +ov 4 5 4 44.0 142 280 440 0.12 _0.23 • _0.37 4.0 4.0 4.0 3 0.- 3.0 3.0 207 818 575 0.10 ' c023 0.04 0.07 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 7 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Aetuated•g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) - 14.2 26.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) WsRatio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v /c•Ratio Uniform Delay, d1+ _Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2_ belay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tter 'ebo rSSu 0.81' 097 51 6 45 6 1.00 1.00 20 1 23 6 71.6 69.2 E_ E 63.1 E 030 27 1 1.00 rr r 1900 1900 1900 4 0 4 0 4.0 1.00 0.88• 1.00. • 1.00 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00; 1.00 1703 2682 1524 • 0.95 .1.00 • 1.00 1703 2682 1524 244 _ 698 130. 0.92 0 92 0.92 265 759 • 141. 265 759 141 6% 6% 6%' Prot custom Prot 3.. 81 23.0 36.8 55.8. 16 0 34.0 23 0 36.8 55 8 16 0 34 0 • 0.19, ,031 ...0.46_ 013 • 0.28. 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0' • 3.0 •- 3.0 3.0 343 1096 744 229 945 c0.19 • 023 , 0.11 0.23 0.41 0.97 '0.76 .' 0.89 _0.84 0.81 48.1 37 7 29 2 50 8 40 0 •1.061 - 100 1.00.. 1.00 1.00 03 39.6 32 124 235 76 27.4 87.7 40.9 41.6 • 74.3. .47 6 C F D D ED 49.b 6- . .. 44.4 D custom Prot custom 23 . 67 57.0 190` 370 ' 51.2. 570 190 370 51.2 0.48. 0 16 `•- 0.31 _..0.43_' 4.0 4.0 3.0 rr 3.0 731 270 827 650 00.16 c0.28 0.09 0.34 0.72 25 2 1 00 35 28.7 0.98 0.92. 50 3 40.0 0 81 0.64 41.6 13.1 82.4 38.5 C F D A 44.9•- D 21.7 0.41 0.1 HCM Average Control Delay 50.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 .. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 tniersection Capacity Utilization 102.1% c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level �t Service 16.0 F R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2002 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak f C 4 \ t \* 1 4/ Movem- __ EBL EBT EBI3 Lane Configurations ' T 1' 4 I+ ►t T? r ' Ideal Ftow (vphpl) ;1900 "1900;• 190_0_ 190.0 1900. 1900 - 1900 • 1900' • 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4.0 4 0 4 0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor . 1.00, 71.00 1.00 ` 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 'Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 •.1.00 1.00,-. 7 ` ; 0.97' 1.00 ' 0.95 ' 1.00 4 1 00 0.95 'Said. Flow (prot) 1719 1810 1538 1842 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 Flt Permitted ' 0:75- 1.00 1.00':" 0.90 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 - 0 95 Satd. Fiow (perm) 1348 1810 1538 1717 1615 1770 3539 1583 1736 Volume?(vph) . 449_ ,•9 377i? 11,. 6 14 491 972 11 47 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) ' 488' - -10 '-410-< ';12'::. 7_" 15 `534 ` -1057 12 51 Lane Group Flow (vph) 488 10 410 0 19 15 534 1057 12 51 Heavy: Vehicles ( %) - 5 %; - 5.%-re 5 %.. 0% 0% • 0% 2%' -' 2% 2% 4% Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Perm Prot •_,--. Protected Phases: _.. -. . .. - -. 3 -.I - -- . 4 7 5 2 1 - Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 2 6 3 Actuated Green, G (s) • • : - 55,6. _ 556;; : 94.6. 4 55.6 66.9 35 0 67.9 67 402 .9 7 40 99 8 : Effective Green, g (s) 55.6 55.6 94 6 55 6 66 9 35 0 67 9 67 9 7.3 40 2 99 8 Actuated g/C. Ratio • 0 39 "'_ 0 339:: _0 :66 _ , 039 0.47 025 0.48 _ , 048 0 05 : 0.28 " 0.70' Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) " 3 0 3.O Pr 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 • Lane Grp Cap(vph) 525 705 1019 669 757 434 1683 753 89 977 1085 Ws Ratio Prot 6_Q ?._,_ _._. . 30 ' 0.30 0.03, .c0.31' v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.21 v / c Ratio • 0 93 _ 0.01 0 40 - : ... 003 002 ' 1.23 0.63 0.02 057 . 1.12 0.30• Uniform Delay, d1 41.7 26.8 11.1 26.9 20.4 53.9 28.0 19.8 66.2 51.3 8.2 Progression Factor ' 1.00 1.00= 1 00 _ 1.00: 1 00 • 1.00 1 00 . 1 00 ..1.00 1 00:;.z,.."1.00 . Incremental Delay, d2 22.9 0.0 0.3 v 0.0 0.0 122.4 0.7 0.0 8.6 66.8 0.2 Delays) 64 6 26.8. 11 4 26.9 20.4 176.3 ". 28.7 19 8 749 118.1 '8.3 _ Level of Service E C- B C C F C B E F A Approach Delay (s) - - _40:2 • �n ' ..24A _.. .'. 77 8 " 92.3 : •e i, Approach LOS D - C E F Intersection Sumrnary N,BI WBTBt3W,NBL NBT NBRSBL SBl SBR _ 7r 1900 - 1900: 4.0 4.0 0.95 • 1.00 - _ - ';,- 1.00 0.85 f 4r:. � 1 00. ,1:00' . . ` 3471 1553 1.00 ' "1.00 7 3471 1553 1005 299. 0.92 0.92 1092 325 1092 325 4% - 4 %. custom HCM Average Control Delay 74.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1 07a�,• ; >`., . Actuated Cycle Length (s) 142.8 Sum of lost time (s)- Intersection Capacity Utilization L T. 103.5% . • ICU_ Level of. Service .. c Critical Lane Group 12.0 F • R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2002 PM Peak Hour.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 4 1: 58th Ave S & Interurban Ave S 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak EalivrEBANIEBBIELNEmavymmy.B.RNBE-mwriammarammittmaire..1311MUSIIIIIIIim1111111111M 4 r 4s _ o 1900 100' 1900 7:1900 1900 .. 1900 .1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00" -1.06 7 1.6o-: 100 0.96L 1.00 0.85 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 -0.95 1.00' ........ 0.98, 95 * 1.00 0.95 . 1.00 1787 1583 1711 1770 3531 1641 3508 0.76 1.00 0.90:07 7 0.95 - • 1,00 095' • 1.00 __..• 1423 1583 1580 1770 3531 1641 3508 _ YertNn""76131MilliNEW Lane Configurations Ideal Row (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane UM. Factor 'Rrt 'Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Volume (vph) - Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. FlovT, (vph) . Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) Tum Type PrOtectedPhases. Permitted Phases Actualed Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) ?‘ctuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) YehiaiExtension-(s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) -,-/stio Prot vis Ratio Perm *Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor _ Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s),. Level of Service Ap-plOaciibelay(s) Approach LOS aternec rriS_u_rornary 83 0 70 1 -- 0 1 28 1121 17, 6 689 0.92 092 692. 092 092 092 092 092 092 092 092 90 0' 76 1 077 1 30- 1218 18 7 749 0 90 76 0 2 0 30 1236 0 7 779 28 0.92 30 0 1% 1% 2% 2% 0% 0% 2% 2% 2% 10% 2% 10% Perm custom Perm Prot Prot 4 . 5 2 1 • 6 4 45 8 • 9.5 ...._199 '....- .... 95" 64 40.8 1.0 354 9.5 19.9 9.5 6.4 40.8 1.0 35.4 • 0.15 __-6.31::":::::::6.16:r :. 010 ' - 064 6.0-2- 056 - 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 30 • - . • 3.0 3.0 3b' 3.0 214 498 237 179 2276 26 1962 002 c0.35. - . • _ 000 _ c0.22.• c0.06 0.05 0.00 0.42. "015 ''.. • '70.61T- 0.17 0.54 24.4 15.6 22.9 26.0 6.2 • 1 00 1 00 ; -1-• ...7c94, '... 1.... ... 1.00. 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 25.7 ._. 15:8'...„,',. 22.9 - • 265 6.4 C B C A 21.2 --- --- - - 229 -T. 6.9 C ---d- A 0.27 0.40 -36.8 7.9 1 00 ..• 1 00 • 5.5 0.1 363 80 1) A 83 A . • HCM Average Control Delay 8.5 HCM Level of Service A HCM_Voltime to Capacifyratio. Actuated Cycle Length (s) 63.3 Sum oi-lost time (s) 12.0 r. s_ eEtior C. aia eity U tiliz ation 52.6% ICU Leve . of Servi A , c Critical Lane Group R: \03011-60\Traffic\Syrichro\ PM Peak - Future Chann w Projech2010 PM Peak Hour-2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5-FF51 5/1/2003 Page 1 2: 1 -405 SB Ramps & Interurban Av. S Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak -► c ~ \-► \ .) h \ r M vemeM EBL EB1T EB, w,,BL W.,BT WBR SEL 'SEf l31liUNwt- NWJlIiNWR Lane Configurations 4 r ►( T. ' P4 r ' fI Ideal Flow (vphpl) `1900`• 1900 1900'.1900 •1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 - 1900. 1900 -., • Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UtiI. Factor 1 A0 100-`. 1.00 1.00 1:00 0.95 100 100 . ' 0.95 . ..... .___ __. . _ ..._ _ . _. -. - .. _ - . Fri 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 FIt Protected . -7".q.-98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0 95; 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.0077 Satd. Flow (prot) 1758 1524 1687 1677 1719 3438 1538 1736 3378 Flt Permitted •0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 . 0.95 1.00 1.00' 0.95. 1.00-- Satd. Flow (perm) 1758 1524 1687 1677 1719 3438 1538 1736 3378 Volume (vph)' 68 '_ 108 .447 ` 152 84 1_ Peak -hour factor, PHF 92 0 92 0.92 0 92 _ , 91 0_ 92 Ad _ j. Flow (vph) _._. -. 747 117 486 165 - - Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 191 486 165 145 Heavy Vehicles ( %) ' 6% 6% . 6% 7% • 7% Turn Type Split custom Split Protected Phases 2'1 - -6 • Permitted Phases 2 2 3 ;Actuated Green G(s). 2i.4' 71'3, 18.6 Effective Green, g (s) -21 4 71.3 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio - - 0.14 . 0.48 0 12 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s)-- '. 3.0 -3.0 - Lane Grp Cap (vph) 251 724 209 v /sMRatio Prof Gift 1 : c0.10 vis Ratio Perm 0.32 50 58 1041 70 600 _885 192 0 92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 .92 0 .92 54 _ 63 , 1132 76 652 962 2.09 0 63 1132 76 652 1171 0 7% 5% 5% 5% 4% 4% ., 4% Prot Prot custom fi •7 4 - 6 42 18.6 8.8_ 69.5 18 6 88 481 695 _ 012 _._. 0.06 0.32 046 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3 0 208 101 1102 713 0.09 0.04 c0.33 _ v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dt Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s). Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS nte_r-section uriimary 0.05 0.76 0 67 . 0 79 0 70 • __- _0 62 _1.03 • 0.11 61.8 30.3 63.8 63.0 69.0 51.0 22.7 52.0 21.4 100: 100 100 1.00 _ 1.00_ 1.00 100 0.72 0.62 4 12.7 25 177 97 11 34.3 0.1 108.0 0.5 7_4.6 32.8 81 5 72 7 . . 80.4, 85.2 22 8 145.5 13.8'' • E C F • E F F C F B • 44.6 77.4,.:' 81.3 - 669.__ D E F E 45.9 45 9 852 0.31 0.57 4.0 4.0 30 3.0;` 531 1919 C0.38 03-6-- HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume toCapacity ratio . Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization c Critical Lane Group 65.8 HCM Level of Service 1.02 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 100.2% .ICU Level of _Service R: \03011- 60 \Trattic\Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour -2.sy6 5/1/2003 AMH Page 2 Entranbel5 -FF51 3: Southcenter Blvd. & Interurban Av. S 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) Timing Plan: PM Peak Movemerrt EBL EBT EBR WBTw,BR NBIT2111 -B.L N6'B SEL SER SER2 Lane Configurations ►i tt r ) ?t r ►i vi) r il rr r Ideal Flow (vphpl) _ : -1900 1900 ' 1900 1900 . >, -1900 .,.1900 1900 1900... 1900 1900 _ 1900• Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane _ . 1.00 0.95 1.00_ -_ 1.00 < 0.95 , 1:00 - 1.00 0.97 1:00. 1.00` 0.88._ . 1.00 ,. Frt 1.00 1.00 0-65 1 00 1 00 0 85 1 00 1 00 0 85 1 00 0 85 0.85 1 Flt Protected . -0.95 1.00 100 0 95 00 100 0.95. 0.95 - 1.00 0.95 100 ' 1.00 a Said. Flow (prot) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 15.99 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Flt Permitted. , ' . ','0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95' - 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 ` Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 3505 1568 1787 3574 1599 1719 3335 1538 1703 2682 1524 Volume (vph) • 177 838 185 350 -.. 885- :: 698 - 24 850 558 280 - -: 796 250 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Ad;. Flow (vph) 192 911; 201.. • - 380 962:- 759 26 924 607 304. 865 272` ° `" Lane Group Flow (vph) 192 911 201 380 962 759 26 924 607 304 865 272 Heavy Vehicles ( %) . : 3 %. 3% 3 %:7- - 1% - 1% '' -1% • 5% 5% 5% ' 6 %. 6% 6% Turn Type . pm +ov Prot custom Prot custom Prot custom Protected Phase," . 7 . 4 . 8 5 3 - 5 , -2. 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 1 2 3 6 7 Actuated Green, G (s)_ , 18 4 37.0_ 46.6 _ 30 0. 48:6;1 73.6 9.6 . 42:0. * 72.0 " 25.0. 57.4, 75 8, Effective Green, g (s) 18.4 37.0 46.6 30.0 48.6 73.6 9.6 42.0 72.0 25.0 57.4 75.8 Actuated g/C Ratio _ : 0.12 0.25- 0 31_ , 0,20 0.32; 0.49_ 006 _ 028 0.48 _ , 0.17 038 051 - Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) . 3.0 3.0 3 0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3A ' • 3.0' - 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 865 487 357 1158 785 110 934 738 284 1026 770 v/s Ratio -Prot .• 0.11 c0.26 0.03 c021 0.27_ , 0 02 c0.28 c0.18 . 0 32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 c0.47 0.39 0.18 v Ratio _ - 0.89 1.05 041 1.06 0 83 0.97 0.24 0.99 0.82 1 07 0.84 0.35. - Uniform Delay, dl 64 8 56 5 40.9 60.0 46 9 37 0 66 7 53.8 33 5 62 5 42.2 22.3 Progression Factor - . 1.00 1.00 100:: _ 1 00 1.06., 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 0.61. 0.18.7 Incremental Delay, d2 33 8 45 6 0 6 657 52 24 0 1.1 27.0 7 4 57.0 4.2 0.1 Detaq(s) , - • 98.7 102.1 41.5_';12.5:_7 52.1.,,._ 61.0 rj. 67.8 80:8, 40.9 122.4 • 301 4.1 . Level of Service F F D F D E E F D F- C ' Approach Delay (s)_ 922 68 s 65.0: 44.7 Approach LOS F E E D O1tersectiop Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) intersection Capacity.Utilization c Critical Lane Group 67.2 HCM Level of Service 150.0 Sum of lost time (s) 116.2%-:'; ICU_Level of Service E R: \03011 -60 \Traffic \Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour -2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 3 4: W.V Hwy /I -405 NB ramps & West Valley Hwy. /Interurban Tukwila 2002 PM Peak Hour (south half) C~ k 4\ t t `► l 1 yerir ent Lane Configurations Ideal: Flow (vphpl) ` • • Total Lost time (s) Lane. Util. Factor. Frt Flt Profected Satd. Flow (prof) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 2010 PM Peak Future Chann w Project Timing Plan: PM Peak EBL EBT ata WBI W.BT 'WBR tVBL�NBT ��V.BR =$BL $B;T $f3Ft 'l + r 4 r 1 tt 1900 1.900 1900 •1900 ,_1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 -0 4.0 4 0 1.00'. 1.00'_ _ 1.00" 1.00 '. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1 -00 0.95 100 100 0 97: :.1.00 0 95 1.00 -1719 1810 1538 ' 1841 1615 1770 3539 0.74 - 1.00 _ 1.00 - 0.90::: y 1.00 0.95 1 00 1344 1810 1538 1704 1615 1770 3539 �. _ TT... �....... 1900, • 1.900. 1900 . 1900,-• 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1:00." "1.00' 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 -'- 1.00i ;- •.1.00 1583 1736 3471- 1553 -- 1.00 ' 0.95 1583 1736 3471 -1553 Volume (vph):_ • = 495. 10 433 13 7' 16 564 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) _ --7- 538 11 471 14_7- 8 . 17 613 Lane Group Flow (vph) 538 11 471 0 22 17 613 Heavy;Vehides ( %) 5 % . 5% 5% 0% . 0% 0% 2% Turn Type Perm custom Prot custom Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases 3 3 5 7 1 Actuated Green; G (s)`,_;_ 56.6 _ `56.6. 94.6 56.6 - 66 1 34.0 Effective Green, g (s) 56.6 56.6 94.6 56 6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 ' 040 066 0.40 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ,Vehicle Extension (s).' - - 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 533 717 1019 v/s Ratio Prot R' • • . 0 01 - -- _ v/s Ratio Perm c0.40 0.31 ;J./4 Ratio - _ • 1.01 0 02 _ 0.46 Uniform Delay, d1 43.1 26 2 11 7 Progression Factor _' 1.00 100 • 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 41 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 218-1 1 4 De-14y7(4): . . - � _84. 4 __26 2 12.1 26.4 - ' 20.8 272 5 30.7 Level of Service F C 6 C C F C Approach Delay (s) .50.4.. _ 24 0 _ 111 1 Approach LOS D C F 1117 13 ' 54 " 1155. 338 •. 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1214 14.; 59 " 1.2550 367• 1214 14 59 _ 1255 367 2% 2% 4% 4% Perm Prot custom .2 63 687 68.7 • 5.5 402._.'100.8_ ,.- 66-1 34.0 68 7 68 7 5 5 40.2 100 -8 0.46 024 0 48 0.48 0 04'.' - 0:287: 0.71 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 . 30 3.0 675 748 421 1703 762 67 977 1096 • c0 35 0.34 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.01 W 0.24 0 03 0.02 146 0.71. 0.02 0.88 264 208 544 293 19.4 68.3 51.3 8.1 1.00 .. 1.00 10_0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ 1 006;.:;.1.00 _ - 00 697 135.9 0.2 19.4 1380 1872 - 8.3 "'_. _ B F F A F of terseedon S_umm HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume:to Capacity ratio_ Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersectiori Capacity,Uiilization c Critical Lane Group 109.8 1.21. 142.8 115.1% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service, R: \03011- 60 \Traffic\Synchro \PM Peak - Future Chann w Project\2010 PM Peak Hour -2.sy6 AMH Entranbel5 -FF51 5/1/2003 Page 4 STARFIRE SPORTS CENTER AT FORT DENT PARK Tukwila, WA INITIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX C • SOCCER FIELD TRIP GENERATION DATA TABLE C -1 SOCCER FIELD TRIP GENERATION DATA SUMMARY ITE Journal on the Web / February 1999 'Trip Generation at Youth Soccer Complexes: Some Unforeseen Issues." By John D. Fricker OpTrans, Inc. / March 2000 'Trip Generation Analysis - Twin Creeks Soccer Fields" Sunnyvale, CA Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) Starfire Peak Hour Activity Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) 47 per 2 games 10 games 235 Entranco Report 244 Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) ITE Potential Independent Variable Starfire Independent Variable Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) Sample No.1. (Small Fields) Sample No.2 (Large Fields) Indoor (Small Fields) Outdoor (Large Fields) Acres 9.03 4.3 2 25 126 Parking Spaces Undefined 0.39 0 450 176 Playing Fields in Use 49.25 21.52 2 7 249 Players Present 2.24 0.72 40 196 231 Entranco Report 244 OpTrans, Inc. / March 2000 'Trip Generation Analysis - Twin Creeks Soccer Fields" Sunnyvale, CA Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate (in and out) Starfire Peak Hour Activity Predicted Starfire PM Peak Hour Soccer Trips (in and out) 47 per 2 games 10 games 235 Entranco Report 244 THE PURDUE STUDENT CHAPTER OF ITE HELPED THE AUTHOR COLLECT TRIP GENERATION DATA AT THE TWO BUSIEST YOUTH SOCCER COMPLEXES IN INDIANA. THE RESULTS ARE EXAMINED, AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE DATA COLLECTION ARE OFFERED. • BY JON D. FRICKER AS THE POPULARITY OF YOUTH soccer continues to grow, more special - purpose facilities are being built to sup- plement and /or replace the recreational areas that soccer shared with other sports in its early years in many locales. As the parent of a child who plays on a traveling team, the author has seen youth soccer complexes of various sizes and of varying quality. Some are adjacent to residential developments; others are still separated from other active land uses. Some have dozens of fields at one location. As new soccer complexes continue to be built, it would be helpful to be able to estimate the traffic generated by such a land -use type. In built -up areas, soccer - generated vehicle traffic could have a major impact on nearby intersections. Recreational soccer matches are often scheduled for early evenings (during the evening peak period) or Saturday morn- ings (in conflict with traffic for shopping and errands). Access drives to youth soc- cer complexes usually do not meet war- rants for traffic signals, but the complexes can cause significant congestion during the relatively few times at which they are active. In less - developed areas, a soccer complex could become the major genera- tor when it is in use. If the road network and traffic- control measures cannot accommodate the traffic generated by a soccer complex, a procedure to predict the traffic volumes would assist the devel- opers of a soccer complex and the local transportation officials. The Purdue Student Chapter of the Institute of Trans- portation Engineers (ITE) undertook data collection for trip generation at the two busiest youth soccer complexes in the Lafayette, Ind., USA, area. Because "Youth Soccer Complex" is not a land - use category in the sixth edition of ITEs Trip Generation,1 several issues had to be ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 addressed before the data were collected. This feature summarizes the issues involved and offers some suggestions to anyone interested in collecting data at youth soccer complexes. THE SITES The first site was McAllister Park, located on the east bank of the Wabash River, about 1.5 miles north of down- town Lafayette. Immediately to the north of McAllister is a municipal golf course, which shares the main vehicle entrance to the soccer fields from North Ninth Street. A second means of access to McAllister is via a one -lane unpaved road that runs down a short steep hill, which is used by only a few vehicles. Most of the other land use in the area is industrial. Most of the games played at McAllister are by recreational teams on Saturdays and Sundays, although two fields have been used for traveling -team matches in recent years. The second site is on Lindberg Road, west of the West Lafayette city limits. Some small, but growing, subdivisions are located further west on Lindberg Road, but the overall setting is, for the time being, still rural. These fields, which were used for the first time in the fall of 1997, were developed for travel- ing -team matches. STANDARD INDEPENDENT VARIABLES At the time the Purdue Student Chapter was preparing its data- collec- tion project, ITE's Trip Generation, 5th Edition Update,2 was the most up -to- date reference. Of the 13 suggested inde- pendent variables in the update, only two seemed applicable —(9) Acres and (10) Parking Spaces. The value of using these two variables is discussed below. Acres. McAllister Park is about 60 acres, but most of it is not used for soc- 75 McAllister Time peeled beginning .' Table 1. Vehicle entries Park Soccer Complex on Entries at each driveway and exits at Saturday, Oct. 11, 1997. Exits at each driveway : North, . South" . North. South' 8:16 a.m. 31 a 0 a 8:21 a.m. 23 a 1 a 8:26 a.m. 17 a 1 a No data collected from 8:31 a.m. to 8:54 a.m. 8:54 a.m. 24 3 11 5 8:59 a.m. 22 3 21 8 9:04 a.m. 21 1 29 5 9:09 a.m. 31 0 6 2 9:14 a.m. 32 3 3 2 9:19 a.m. 29 2 4 0 9:24 a.m. 26 3 20 0 Notes: aSouth driveway was not observed from 8:16a.m. to 8:31 a.m. On average, 11 of 14 fields were in use for recreational league games. Each team had seven players on the field and approximately three reserve players. Approximately 220 players were present. No public transportation service was available. cer fields. A lot of space is used by vehi- cles parked on the grass next to each of the perimeter soccer fields; other space is left open at McAllister for such activities as flying remote - controlled model air- planes. The effective boundary of the soccer complex is not easy to define, and the 60 -acres value is the result of the author's best estimate. At the Lindberg Complex, the area seeded for playing fields, warm -up and spectators, plus the area covered with crushed stone for park- ing, totals 15 acres. However, as is the case for most land -use types, "acres" should be used as an independent vari- able only if no other variable is available. Parking Spaces. At Lindberg, the crushed -stone lot can hold about 165 vehicles. So far, all of these spaces have not been used at one time, but not all fields have been put into operation. Once this happens, more spaces may be needed. Obviously, this is not a good independent variable to use to develop a trip generation rate. At McAllister, the number of parking spaces is almost impossible to estimate. Any place that is not a playing field in use can become a parking spot. Based on the discussion regarding Lindberg's finite- capacity lot, estimating McAllister's parking capacity would not be worth the effort. Clearly, new independent variables that help define a usable trip generation rate relationship for youth soccer com- plexes needed to be devised. NEW INDEPENDENT VARIABLES The criteria used by the student - chapter members in proposing any new independent variable were: • It could be defined clearly; • It could be measured with little effort or confusion; and • Its numerical value for a proposed youth soccer complex could be meaningfully estimated. The independent variables considered are discussed below. Number of Playing Fields. Just as "Number of Drive -In Windows" for Land Use 912 Drive -In Banks in Trip Generation' needs to be clarified in terms of "number available" vs. "num- ber in use," this value can be easily mis- understood and misused. At McAllister, 14 fields are laid out, but not more than 11 are usually used at one time. At Lindberg, immediate plans for five fields exist; four are laid out, but only three fields were sched- uled for use last fall when data were collected. This variable is easy to count, but its use in predicting what traffic a future soccer complex would generate depends on how "number of fields" is defined. If the eventual number of fields available for use at a proposed site is treated as the "build -out" condi- tion and previous data were collected with X = number of fields in use, then this variable could help establish a rea- sonable upper bound on T. Number of Players. A recent trend in youth soccer is to play "small- sided" matches, in which each team has seven players on the field, instead of the tradi- tional 11. Fewer players means fewer vehicles to drop off and pick up players, unless the number of teams (and matches and fields) is increased to accommodate the player demand. This variable would require the data collector to observe how many players were play- ing on each field. Seven- player matches use smaller fields, so there is room at a site for more such fields. This is another reason to be careful when simply count- ing the number of fields for use as an X variable. At McAllister, the recreational matches had seven players on the field, with about 11 players present. At Lind- berg, the traveling teams had rosters of 15, with 11 players on the field. ISSUES REGARDING DEPENDENT VARIABLES Peaking. In the Trip Generation Update,2 land uses have weekend data for Saturday, Sunday, and Saturday or Sunday "Peak Hour of Generator." Peaking at a youth soccer complex is unlike that at almost any other land use. It may even vary from complex to com- plex. Depending on how tightly the matches are scheduled, players and par- ents for one match may arrive before the 76 ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 Tim beg Table 2. Vehicle entries and exits at Lindberg Soccer Complex on Saturday, Oct. 11, 1997. e mte period Vehide inning exits .' . 2:35 p.m. 2:40 p.m. 2:50 p.m. 3:00 p.m. 3:10 p.m. 3:20 p.m. 3:30 p.m. 3:40 p.m. 3:50 p.m. 4:00 p.m. 4:10 p.m. 4:20 p.m. 4:30 p.m. 4:40 p.m. 4:50 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 5:10 p.m. 5:20 p.m. 5:30 p.m. 5:40 p.m. 5:50 p.m. 6:00 p.m. Vehicle entries 2 6 27 5 2 6 3 0 4 2 11 34 14 3 5 0 2 5 23 Notes: Only two of four fiefrls were in use for these traveling -team games. U14girls match ended about 4:15 p.m.; U12 boys match ended about 4.30 p.m. Each team had 11 players on the field and approximately three reserve players. Approxi- mately 56 players were present. 165 parking spaces were available. No public transportation service was available. ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 players and parents for the previous match have departed. At some com- plexes, start times for matches are stag- gered; at other sites, all matches may be scheduled to start at the same time. The impact on the adjacent street system may depend on how pronounced the peak is within any given hour. The severity of this peak will not be captured by reporting and publishing a value for an hour. The data in Table 1 for 5- minute intervals at McAllister indicate a fairly steady entry flow over the time observed but show a sharp peak in the exiting traffic for 10 minutes. At Lind- berg, sharp peaks were observed shortly after a match ended (Table 2). It may be a good idea to record driveway counts at youth soccer complexes in intervals of at most 10 minutes. Recreational match or traveling? Most of the author's child's traveling -team matches are more than one hour's drive from Lafayette. Many of the team parents own vans. As a result, much ridesharing is done to out -of -town matches. For home matches, very little ridesharing takes place. It is possible that the vehicle trip generation rate for visiting teams at travel matches may be only half as high as for the local teams. If this proves to be a sig- nificant phenomenon, a separate land -use category could be established. At this point, however, a simple note as to the number of fields in use by travel teams should be part of the data report. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the erratic temporal distribution of trip ends at youth soccer complexes. Because of this, the daily (or even hourly) trip rates found in Trip Generation may not be the best repre- sentation of the site's impact on the adja- cent street system. It is essential to have a clear concept of why the rate is being cal- culated. For example, if the driveway(s) or road(s) to /from a proposed soccer com- plex may require traffic signals, the trip generation rates must be calculated in a way that is compatible with the method used to conduct a signal- warrant analysis. In Table 3, some trip rates are calcu- lated from the data in Tables 1 and 2. In Table 1, the peak 10 minutes of the gen- erator occurred between 8:59 and 9:09 a.m. Between 8:54 and 9:29 a.m. (a period 35/60 -hour long), 316 entries and exits were observed. At Lindberg (Table 2), 226 entries and exits took place between 2:35 and 6:05 p.m. (3.5 hours). The generator's peak 10- minute period was from 2:50 to 3 p.m. The value of the "Players Present" variable was calculated for McAllister as follows: 11 fields X 11 roster players /team X 2 teams /field = 242 players. For Lindberg, the corresponding calculation is 3 X 15 X 2 = 90 players. The rates in Table 3 do not follow the typical calculations in Trip Generation because of the unusual traffic patterns associated with this land use. With a more substantial database, it may be possible to calculate 10- minute and one -hour rates that can be applied to traffic- signal -war- rant analysis and other uses. SUMMARY Based on observations made at only two complexes, it is not wise to draw solid conclusions. In collecting data at the two sites, the counting of vehicles was the easiest part of the project. There are typically few entrances to a youth soccer complex, even if the parking is as unstructured as at the McAllister site. The difficulty in devising a useful rela- tionship between vehicle trips and inde- pendent variables at a soccer complex is deciding upon appropriate independent variables. If this land use is ever included in a future edition of Trip Generation, it may need to be treated as a special case. Data for the Tvariable may have to be collected in time intervals much shorter than one hour, and the Xvariables may have to be defined carefully by both ITE and the data contributors. Clearly, more data collection at youth soccer complexes must take place before some of these issues can be resolved. In the meantime, the author would appre- ciate the comments and suggestions of anyone who has thoughts on the subject. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The data for this project were col- lected by the author and Ben Good, Darren Jorgenson and Gary Shoup, members of the Purdue Student Chapter 77 Table 3. Sample Independent Variable Acres rate calculations Tnne Period Peak 10 minutes for two youth soccer McAlli , , ster 110 /60 = 1.83 complexes. Lindberg 36/15 = 2.40 Acres Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/60 = 9.03 (226/3.5)/15 = 4.30 Parking Spaces Peak 10 minutes Number of parking spaces hard to determine 36/165 = 0.22 Parking Spaces Observed data converted to average hourly rate (226/3.5)/165 = 0.39 Playing Fields in Use Peak 10 minutes 110/11 = 10.0 36/3 = 12.0 Playing Fields in Use Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/11 = 49.25 (226/3.5)/3 = 21.52 Players Present Peak 10 minutes 110/242 = 0.45 36/90 = 0.40 Players Present Observed data converted to average hourly rate [316/(35/60)]/242 = 2.24 (226/3.5)/90 = 0.72 of ITE, who, along with other student - chapter members, took part in "brain- storming" about some of the issues discussed in this feature. The suggestions made by the reviewers of the manuscript also were very helpful. • References I. ITE. Trip Generation, 6th Edition. Wash- ington, D.C., USA, 1997. 2. ITE. Trip Generation, February 1995, 5th Edition Update. Washington, D.C., USA, 1995. JON D. FRICKER, Ph.D., PE, has been on the civil engineering fac- ulty at Purdue Univer- sity since 1980. For 14; almost as long Fricker has coached refereed and watched youth soc- cer. Until his four-year-old daughter starts playing soccer, he has some time to do vehicle counts at soc- cer matches. Fricker is a Member of ITE 78 ITE JOURNAL ON THE WEB / FEBRUARY 1999 - ••OPTRA NS ATTACHMENT' Pas 1 of 3 Mr. Jack Witthatis . " Transportation n _Kanner City'of Sunnyvale 45t W. alive • Sunnyvale, CA 940SS Subject:. • 'Trip Generation Analysis T'.'in Creeks Soccer Fields Acar.Mr.. Witthaus: We have reviewed • the information provider{ by the applicant for thc proposed soccer fields within the Twin Creeks Sport Complex. Based anfour.analysis, k is. estimated that thc proposed soccer fields will generate approximately 50 weekday evening (PM) peak hour trips and will not meet the Congestion Management Agency threshold requiring:tt. Transportation Impact Analysis. ::Thc intorrnation provided .by. the •applica3it and thc calculation orpcak hour trip generation' are 'turn tit ari•ed iri Tabled (attached). Games are not scheduled to start at the same time on all four fluids. It is expected that games on" two of the four fields wilt result in peak hour trips. Trips associated with the other twin{clds will occur outside of the peak hour. While it is not consistent with the normal game scheduling, we have provided an trip generation estimate assuming game times that'result . in peak hour trips being generated by all four fields. Even under this .unlikely scenario the CMA threshold for a Transportation Itnpact Analysis is not met. We reviewed available trip generation data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (iTE) and did not find any available data for facilities similar to those proposed in Sunnyvale. It would_ be desirable to collect data a the Sport Complex to. compare with the analysis accompanying this letter. However, this is the off season for the baseball', fields and the aFilrlic anL';i schedule. for.complcting the'soccer fields Clines not pCrmit the delay that.votild he iritroduetd by•waiting to collect intersection data earring thc baseball season. We have =viewed recent counts at the intersection of the Moffett Park/Twin Creeks entrance intersection with Curibbcan. The counts were taken in December of 1999 and indicate that .19 vehicles exited and 15 entered the Sports Complex during the I'M peak hour. We helievc the attached analysis adequately reflects potential trip generation from the four soccer fields proposed in the Twin Cracks Sports. Center and establishes that a full 401O1 came Yarter load • 6reenrield • CA fJf21.37Ds Ili /3t.dS1 5514 • LAX aJ1.fi9.sSJd • t.mail: optrinrPpubett,ou LOCATION:1 831 659 8536 DV .-rrrC et • J•n .• w, U1/ 14/ LYJCJ3 14. LO 4130 /iUJ / /1D Apr -Z0 -00 11=55q OpTrans,Inc. _ Mr. Jack Witthaus April 7, 2000 Page 2 ra+vc u.) 1 "Z1 659 8536 P.O6 ATTfiCHNIENTI G of 3 Traffic Impact Analysis should not be required for the project. Further. it is our understanding that • the applicant ,is willing to restrict activities at the soccer tacil.i0e,. ;to reduce the potential• forpCak period trip generation.; SiMilarly, activity. schedules can. he adjusted 'so that traffic associated with the soccer facilities is prodoininantly in the non- peak direction. Most traffic associated with land uses in the Moffett Park,arca. is ;highly. directional. in the PM peak hour most traffic travels southbound and eastbound. on the streets in the area. 13v scheduling events that begin late in the peak period and end aticr the.peak period, most traffic associated with the soccer facility will travel in the off peak, direction. • • If you.have any questions regarding our analysis and findings please give me a call. • Sincerely_ ' OPTRANS, INC. A. raticrson, P.E.` Principal cc: Frank Lewis C:WucsvrojeetsmonorTreport 1 83ti• .659 8536 Trip Generation Analysis Twin Creeks Soccer Fields OpTrans, Inc . 6- Mar -00' • Summary of Activities Table ,1 P -07 ATTACHMENT' __� Page or 3 of Proposed soccer fields R of Months per year Players per team 12 12 Spectators per team • r.... Umpires per game • 2 Games per field per night 2-4 Length or games 75 minutes Game Times (Weekday) 5:30 to H :30 PM Garne-Times (Weekend) 8:00 AM to 8:30 PM Player and Spectator Arrivals 15 minutes prior to game time Peak Commute Times 4:00 to 600 PM g of Games Generating Peak Hour Trips 4 (1 per field) Assumed Auto Occupancy 1.5 imate of Trips Generated Persons Arriving in Peak Hour Persons Leaving fn Peak Hour Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation LOCATION:1 831 659 8536 • 2 -games 4- games, 64. . .128 14 • (Drop -offs etc.) • 47 95 (Vehicles per hour) DV TTMC nA.I ■ 1'... ..._ Paivf Pfa,v, s- .-p re-- P uJ cs` sf-ti tt- Hors1. csEN_ Ciotre:d 7,00 CONTENTS TAB 1: Large Stadium Event Critique TAB 2: Large Stadium Event Plan TAB 3: Parking & Traffic Monitoring Plan TAB 4: Parking Management Plan TAB 5: Traffic & Parking Analysis Tflra nco. MEMORANDUM Date: August 10, 2004 To: Chris Slatt, Starfire Sports From: Ken Oswell, P.E. Andrea Hammelman Subject: Starfire Sports Complex Critique of Large Stadium Event Parking and Traffic Operations Entranco Project No. 03011 -60 Introduction This memo is intended to meet the requirement in our contract to provide a critique of the parking and traffic operations during each of the three conditions identified in our contract to be monitored. The three conditions to be monitored include an average day, a combination of local softball and soccer tournaments, and a large stadium event that uses the existing stadium bleacher seating. This technical memorandum critiques the parking and traffic operations for a large stadium event held on Saturday, April 3, 2004 (a Seattle Sounders kids' clinic and home soccer game). A softball tournament in the Complex was ending at approximately the same time the Seattle Sounders game was beginning at 7:00 PM (19:00). Parking Management Plan Critique The overlap of the final softball games with the beginning of the large stadium event resulted in the underutilization of the Starfire parking lot. It would have been easier to manage the parking supply if there was even as little as a half -hour between the exiting of the last of the softball traffic and the start of the stadium event. The primary difficulty for parking management occurred during the switchover from the Starfire parking lot to the overflow parking area. While the ticket sellers working in the Starfire parking area finished up with the traffic queued there, only one ticket seller was in the overflow area. This ticket seller was positioned between the first driveway and the traffic circle, which minimized the queuing distance to Interurban Avenue. By the time other ticket sellers arrived to help, the queue extended out onto interurban Avenue. There needed to be a full crew of ticket sellers available at the overflow area at the change -over, and they needed to be stationed further east near the Espresso stand to maximize the queue storage area on Fort Dent Way. This would require coning off the first available driveway into the overflow parking area. C: \Documents and Settings \Owner\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLKC5\Stadium Event Critiquel.doc Chris Slatt August 10, 2004 For both the Starfire parking lot and the overflow parking area, it would have been better to have more ticket sellers and to station them where they could serve traffic in two lanes, if possible. The parking fee of three dollars collected from each vehicle encouraged higher average vehicle occupancy (2.5 persons per vehicle) and reduced parking demand. Despite the above comments, the parking management plan successfully addressed the primary needs for the large stadium event. The combined capacity in the Starfire parking lot and the overflow parking area was adequate for the event and all cars were parked without incident. Traffic Operations Critique The only traffic issues prior to the game occurred as the Complex parking lot reached capacity. The changeover to the overflow parking area was not very efficient and a substantial queue formed on Fort Dent Way while the ticket sellers relocated from the Starfire parking lot to the overflow parking area. By the time they were relocated, a short queue had extended south on Interurban Avenue, a condition that persisted until about 7:10 PM (19:10). There were no traffic issues identified after the game. The signal at Interurban Ave S and Fort Dent Way was on flash and traffic was directed by a uniformed police officer in the intersection for about twenty -five minutes from 9:05 PM (21:05) until 9:30 PM (21:30). During this time there was no excessive queuing on other legs and traffic on all legs was cleared on every cycle. Traffic from the site was able to exit smoothly with the help of the police officer and had no detrimental effect on operations at any other traffic signals in the vicinity. Traffic exiting the two parking areas merged smoothly into one lane around the traffic "circle" and then separated into two lanes along Fort Dent Way approaching Interurban Avenue. Starfire staff signed the outside lane on Fort Dent Way as "Right Turn Only" and the center lane for through and left turn movements at Interurban. The signing was largely adhered to and there was very little conflict at the intersection from misaligned traffic. Study Findings The Parking Management Plan was largely successful. If possible, allow thirty to sixty minutes between the end of other significant events at the Starfire Sports Complex and the start of a large stadium event. Have additional ticket sellers available for the switch over from the Starfire parking lot to the overflow parking area. Increase the number of ticket sellers overall and try to station ticket sellers in areas where traffic could be separated into two lanes for additional capacity. Provide additional training for ticket sellers and parking management staff, and provide improved communications between staff during events. Page 2 of 3 Chris Slatt August 10, 2004 The traffic operations plan was well executed and successful. Some additional coning along the south edge of the two -way, left-turn lane on Fort Dent Way could help reduce potential conflicts and help orient exiting traffic. The event was large enough to make it clear that the Parking and Traffic Management Plans, updated as recommended above, could be successful for a capacity stadium event as well. Page 3 of 3 Branco. MEMORANDUM Date: April 26, 2004 To: Chris Slatt, Starfire Sports From: Ken Oswell, P.E. Andrea Hammelman Subject: Starfire Sports Complex Parking and Traffic Operations for a Large Stadium Event Entranco Project No. 03011 -61 Background The Starfire Sports Complex is a soccer and softball facility operating at Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila, Washington. The Complex will eventually feature: eight, year around, lighted, outdoor soccer fields (four currently in operation); two indoor soccer arenas; support facilities (weight room, childcare, food court; offices), and four lighted softball fields (currently in operation). One of the outdoor soccer fields currently in operation also has existing bleacher stadium seating for up to 1,800 spectators. A traffic impact analysis study has been prepared to investigate potential parking and traffic impacts of the Complex. However, since there is very little factual data on trip generation for the anticipated uses, the City of Tukwila has asked for additional studies to monitor the Complex after opening to confirm actual impacts. Conditions to be monitored include an average day, a combination of local softball and soccer tournaments, and a large stadium event that uses the existing stadium bleacher seating. This technical memorandum documents the parking and traffic operations for a large stadium event held on Saturday, April 3, 2004 (a Seattle Sounders kids clinic and home soccer game). A softball tournament in the Complex was ending at approximately the same time the Seattle Sounders home game was beginning at 7:00 PM (19:00). Data Collection In order to study the impact of a large stadium event, three study intersections were selected based on a review of the site plan and estimated trip distribution outlined in the Traffic and Parking Analysis (April 29, 2003) prepared for the Starfire Sports Complex. Turning movement counts were collected at the three study intersections one hour prior to the event and one hour following the event. The three study intersections and control type are listed below: Signalized intersections: 1. Interurban Avenue S / Fort Dent Way 2. Interurban Avenue S / Southcenter Boulevard (Grady Way South) 3. West Valley Highway / S 156th Street (1 -405 eastbound on- and off - ramps) C: \Documents and Settings \Owner\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLKC5 \Stadium Event Operations Memo3.doc Chris Slatt April 26, 2004 Traffic counts were also collected in five - minute increments prior to and following the event at the Starfire parking lot entrance and the entrance to the overflow parking area. The complete summary of intersection counts and parking volumes can be found in the Appendix. Pedestrians arriving on the site from alternative locations were monitored to identify off - site parking locations. However, the number of pedestrians accessing the site from locations other than the overflow parking area was negligible. The average car occupancy (ACO) was determined by visual inspection or inquiry by staff stationed with the parking ticket sellers prior to the event. Every vehicle entering during this period was included in the sample. Parking Results The vehicles entering the parking lots were plotted on a graph in relationship to time. Figure 1 shows the volume of vehicles versus time for the entrance to the Starfire Sports Complex parking lot. Figure 2 shows the volume of vehicles versus time for the overflow parking lot. As shown in Figures 1 and 2, there were two peak hours for this large stadium event. The first peak hour was from 6:15 PM (18:15) 7:15 PM (19:15), and generally corresponded to the 7:00 PM (19:00) start time for the Sounders game. This correlates to the arrival of vehicles for the event, and is referred to in this memorandum as peak hour A. The second peak hour from 8:45 PM (20:45) to 9:45 PM (21:45) correlates to the departure of vehicles from the event, and is referred to herein as peak hour B. As shown in Figure 1, approximately 300 vehicles were parked in the Starfire Sports Complex parking lot prior to peak hour A. This was due to the softball tournament taking place at the facility. Because of the overlap in events, the Complex parking lot was not fully utilized for the large stadium event. As shown in Figure 1, by 6:30 PM (18:30) it appeared the on -site parking was nearly depleted, and Starfire staff began diverting the majority of traffic to the overflow parking area at about 6:40 PM (18:40). However, between 6:30 PM (18:30) and 7:30 PM (19:30) vehicles were exiting the softball tournament at a faster rate then cars were arriving for the stadium event. As a result, only about 300 of the 436 spaces available in the park were utilized for the stadium event, leaving about 136 spaces unused. At the end of the study at 10:00 PM (22:00), approximately 5 vehicles were remaining in the Starfire parking lot. As shown in Figure 2, approximately 40 vehicles were parked in the overflow parking area prior to peak hour A. Vehicle accumulation began about 6:40 PM (18:40), when workers began diverting the majority of traffic to the overflow parking area. The last stadium event traffic was essentially parked by 7:30 PM (19:30), and utilized about 200 of the 339 spaces available in the overflow parking lot, leaving about 139 spaces unused. At the end of the study there were approximately 45 cars still in the overflow area, indicating that the 40 cars there at the beginning of the evening could be long -term parking (company cars, etc.). Page 2 of 7 awnloA ino /uI 0 1 O ti. r M ■ o0 �0n 0 �°n o0 C) M N N awnloA and ;elnwn33b 0 0 0 o in 0 21:45 22:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 21 m Y a Y t0 d 0. awnioq ;noIum ttn M M N N 10 0 e- t0 0 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 awnioq ani ;einwnaay 0 10 0 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 22:00 min r � • E E C G r� r El E E mEl mom 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 0 awnioq ani ;einwnaay 0 10 0 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 22:00 Chris Slatt April 26, 2004 A parking fee of three dollars was collected from each vehicle to intentionally encourage higher average vehicle occupancy and reduce parking demand. The average car occupancy observed during peak hour A for cars entering both parking areas for the stadium event was 2.5 persons per vehicle (see Appendix for complete calculations). Table 2 on the following page estimates parking demand for a capacity stadium event based on the data from the Sounders game on April 3, 2004. Based on the ACO and the maximum event parking in the two parking areas of about 360 vehicles and 160 vehicles for the Sounders game, the parking situation replicated a stadium event of approximately 1,300 attendees. A capacity stadium event would be approximately 1,800 attendees, which would require about 200 more parked cars based on an ACO of 2.5. There would be about 76 spaces and 139 spaces for a total of 215 spaces available in the two lots to accommodate the 200 additional vehicles generated by a capacity stadium event, while still accommodating 40 vehicles using the overflow parking area for long -term parking. Parking Management Plan Critique The parking management plan successfully addressed the primary needs for the large stadium event. The combined capacity in the Starfire parking lot and the overflow parking area was adequate for the event and all cars were parked without incident. Traffic Operations Analysis Table 1 below summarizes the level of service for the three study intersections prior to and after the event. Table 1 — Intersection Level of Service .h Departing Traffic Interurban Ave S /Fort Dent Way Signalized C 20.2 B 18.4 Interurban Ave S /Southcenter Boulevard (S Grady Way) Signalized C 25.6 B 15.2 Interurban Ave S/S 156th Street (1-405 eastbound on- and off - ramps) Signalized C 25.4 B 13.5 Notes: 1. Signal = signalized intersection. 2. LOS is the level of service, a concept based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections. 3. Delay, measured in seconds per vehicle, is the average of all the control delay experienced for all the movements of a signalized intersection. At unsignalized intersections, the reported delay is for only one movement, the movement experiencing the worst control delay, which is typically a stop - controlled side street approach. The control delay at unsignalized intersections is not a valid indication of the operations at the entire intersection. Page 5 of 7 Starfire Sports Complex f+ w E z N C . co co U w as E .N w Unused Parking Spaces co N O a) ,_ Estimated Event Attendees ��M 0N.000 0 Q LOU) N N to LC) N N Maximum Event Parking 0 0 0 CD CON CO — to 0 0 0 M0N t• N 1, Estimated Long -Term Parking Maximum Parked Cars 000 MNt[o) 000 �C) F- Parking Spaces Available co rn to cr)CO1- '•cO1� Co rn 10) CO CO 1%. V' M1-. Starfire Parking Lot Overflow Parking Area April 3, 2004 Event Totals Starfire Parking Lot Overflow Parking Area Estimated Capacity Event Totals Page 6 of 7 Chris Slatt April 26, 2004 The level of service (LOS) for the study intersections remained above city standards for both arriving and departing traffic. The signal at Interurban Ave S and Fort Dent Way was on flash and traffic was directed by a uniformed police officer in the intersection for about twenty -five minutes after the game from 9:05 PM (21:05) until 9:30 PM (21:30). During this time there was no excessive queuing on other legs and traffic on all legs was cleared on every cycle. During police control the cycle length for the signal was approximately 90 seconds. Complete capacity calculations are included in the Appendix. The changeover of ticket sellers from the Starfire parking lot to the overflow parking area was not very efficient, and a queue formed on Fort Dent Way while the ticket sellers relocated. By the time they were relocated, a short queue also extended to the south on Interurban Avenue, but that condition persisted only until about 7:10 PM (19:10). Any vehicles wanting to access the hotel or commercial offices around the overflow parking area were also delayed briefly by queues, but were otherwise given immediate access by Starfire staff placed for that purpose. The three lanes on Fort Dent Way between Interurban Avenue and the traffic "circle" were more than adequate to handle both entering and exiting traffic for the large stadium event. Traffic exiting the two parking areas merged smoothly into one lane around the traffic "circle" and then separated into two lanes along Fort Dent Way approaching Interurban Avenue. Starfire staff signed the outside lane on Fort Dent Way as "Right Turn Only" and the center lane for through and left turn movements at Interurban. The signing was largely adhered to and there was very little conflict at the intersection from misaligned traffic. Traffic Operations Critique The only traffic issues prior to the game occurred as the Complex parking lot reached capacity. The changeover of the ticket sellers to the overflow parking area needs to be expedited to keep queues from forming on Fort Dent Way. There were no significant traffic issues identified after the game. Traffic from the site was able to exit smoothly with the help of the police officer and had no detrimental effect on operations at any other traffic signals in the vicinity. Traffic on Interurban Avenue at that hour on a Saturday night was relatively light, as shown in the count data in the Appendix. Study Findings The Parking Management Plan was largely successful. The Traffic Management Plan was well executed and very successful. The event was large enough to make it clear that the Parking and Traffic Management Plans could be successful for a capacity stadium event as well. Page 7 of 7 Entranco Bellevue, WA Starfire Sports Complex Parking and Traffic Monitoring Plan 1. PLAN PURPOSE November 21, 2003 A. Project Description The Starfire Sports Complex is a soccer and softball facility that will be housed at Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila, Washington. The Complex will feature: eight, year around, lighted, outdoor soccer fields; two indoor soccer arenas; support facilities (weight room, childcare, food court; offices), and four lighted softball fields. One of the outdoor soccer fields will retain existing bleacher stadium seating for up to 1,800 spectators. A traffic impact analysis study has been prepared to investigate potential parking and traffic impacts of the Complex. However, since there is very little factual data on trip generation for the anticipated uses, the City has asked for additional studies to monitor the Complex after opening to confirm actual impacts. B. Analysis Scenarios The purpose of this plan is to collect and analyze the data needed to quantify the actual parking and traffic impacts of the Starfire Sports Complex after opening. The plan includes measuring both parking and traffic operational impacts during one occurrence of the following three scenarios: • Average Day, (normal day -to -day operations). Study will be conducted to include a weekday p.m. peak hour to identify any critical transportation impacts. • Combined Tournaments (simultaneous regional soccer and softball tournaments). Study will be conducted to include a weekday p.m. peak hour to identify any critical transportation impacts. • Capacity Stadium Event (with other limited Complex background activities). Study will be conducted on a weekend since this is when larger stadium events will typically occur. 2. PARKING MONITORING PLAN A. Average Day and Combined Tournaments Parking Monitoring Plan The following tasks will be conducted for each of these two scenarios. Task 2A.1: Site Parking Input/Output Study Collect traffic counts at the Complex entrance in five- minute increments for two -hours centered around the p.m. peak hour on a Friday. Vehicles already on site will be counted immediately before the study and included in graphs depicting the incremental accumulation of vehicles throughout the event. Vehicles remaining on site will be counted immediately after the study to quantify the accuracy of collected data. C:\Documents and Settings \Owner\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLKC5 \City Monitoring Plan 1 1-19-03.doc Starfire Sports Complex November 21, 2003 Parking and Traffic Monitoring Plan Task 2A.2: Ident fy Off -Site Parking Demand Monitor pedestrians arriving on site to identify off -site parking locations, if any, used during these scenarios. Monitor designated off -site parking areas, if any, for vehicle accumulation during events. Task 2A.3: Monitor the Effectiveness of Management Plans If these scenarios require off -site parking, discuss the effectiveness of management techniques implemented for the event, including parking agreements, parking fee collection, and parking control plans. Task 2A. 4: Monitor the Average Car Occupancy of Parked Vehicles Monitor vehicle occupancy for vehicles parking on -site during these scenarios. It is assumed that on -site data can be extrapolated to vehicles parked off -site. B. Capacity Stadium Event Parking Monitoring Plan The following tasks will be conducted for this scenario. Task 2B.1: Site Parking Input/Output Study Collect traffic counts at the Complex entrance in five- minute increments for one hour before and after the stadium event. Vehicles already on site will be counted immediately before the study and included in graphs depicting the incremental accumulation of vehicles throughout the event. Vehicles remaining on site will be counted immediately after the study to confirm the accuracy of collected data. Task 2B.2: Ident Off -Site Parking Demand Monitor pedestrians arriving on site to identify off -site parking locations used during these scenarios. Monitor designated off -site parking areas for vehicle accumulation during the event. Task 2B.3: Monitor the Effectiveness of Management Plans Discuss the effectiveness of management techniques implemented for the event, including parking agreements, parking fee collection, and parking control plans. Task 2B.4: Monitor the Average Car Occupancy of Parked Vehicles Monitor vehicle occupancy for vehicles parking on -site during this scenario. It is assumed that on -site data can be extrapolated to vehicles parked off -site. 3. TRAFFIC MONITORING PLAN A. Average Day and Combined Tournaments Traffic Monitoring Plan The following tasks will be conducted for each of these two scenarios. Page 2 of 4 Entranco Bellevue, WA Starfire Sports Complex November 21, 2003 Parking and Traffic Monitoring Plan Task 3A.1: Identify Site Traffic Use existing data to identify the p.m. peak hour of transportation facilities serving the Complex. Use traffic count data collected during the p.m. peak hour to quantify the p.m. peak hour trip generation for the site with each scenario. Task 3A.2: Identify Other Center Traffic Conduct traffic counts at off -site parking areas to identify other Complex event traffic, if any. Task 3A.3: Estimate Center Traffic Distribution Monitor turning movement counts at the Fort Dent Way /Interurban Avenue intersection to estimate trip distribution for each scenario. Coordinate with City staff to extrapolate event trip distribution to other transportation facilities. Task 3A.4: Identifi, Impacted Intersections Estimate intersections in the City of Tukwila that will have 5 or more additional entering vehicles during the PM peak hour as a result of Complex event traffic, and obtain weekday p.m. peak hour background traffic counts for the identified intersections. It is estimated that up to 6 intersections may be impacted. Task 3A.5: Traffic Analysis Use the Synchro- SimTraffic analysis model to evaluate weekday p.m. peak hour level of service (LOS) at up to 6 intersections identified in the above task for each scenario. Task 3A.6: Center Traffic Impacts and Mitigation Traffic impacts created by Complex traffic will be identified for each scenario. Potential mitigation for impacts covered by regulatory requirements, if any, will be described. B. Capacity Stadium Event Traffic Monitoring Plan The following tasks will be conducted for this scenario. Task 3B.1: Identify Site Traffic Use traffic count data collected during the hour before and after the stadium event to quantify the trip generation for the site. Task 3B.2: Identify Other Center Traffic Conduct traffic counts at off-site parking areas to identify other Complex event traffic. Task 3B.3: Estimate Center Traffic Distribution Monitor turning movement counts at the Fort Dent Way /Interurban Avenue intersection to estimate trip distribution for this scenario. Coordinate with City staff to extrapolate event trip distribution to other transportation facilities. Page 3 of 4 Entranco Bellevue, WA Starfire Sports Complex November 21, 2003 Parking and Traffic Monitoring Plan Task 3B.4: Identify Impacted Intersections Estimate intersections in the City of Tukwila that will have 5 or more additional entering vehicles as a result of Complex event traffic, and obtain background traffic counts for the identified intersections. It is estimated that up to 6 intersections may be impacted. Task 3B.5: Traffic Analysis Use the Synchro - SimTraffic analysis model to evaluate level of service (LOS) with Complex traffic at up to 6 intersections identified in the above task for this scenario. Task 3B.6: Center Traffic Impacts and Mitigation Traffic impacts created by Complex traffic will be identified for this scenario. Potential mitigation for impacts covered by regulatory requirements, if any, will be described. Page 4 of 4 Entranco Bellevue, WA STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX TUKWILA, WASHINGTON PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED FOR STARFIRE SPORTS PREPARED BY Branco. 10900 NE 8TH Street, Suite 300 Bellevue, WA 98004 November 21, 2003 Starfire Sports Complex Parking Management Plan Table of Contents Title Introduction Page Project Description 1 Analysis Scenarios 1 Project Traffic Project Vehicle trips for Transportation Concurrency 2 Project Traffic Distribution 3 Parking Analysis Existing Parking 3 Parking Demand 4 Parking Plan Summary Average Day Scenario 4 Combined Tournaments Scenario 6 Capacity Stadium Event Scenario 6 List of Tables Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Facilities Schedule 1 Table 2 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios 2 Table 3 — Trip Generation for Combined Tournaments Scenario 3 Table 4 — Starfire Sports Complex Parking Demand Analysis 5 List of Appendices Appendix A - Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN INTRODUCTION Project Description This report documents the trip generation, trip distribution, and potential traffic impacts of the Starfire Sports Complex proposed to be opened entirely within Fort Dent Park in the City of Tukwila. Fort Dent Park is located just north of Fort Dent Way, between the Green River and the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe railroad tracks. The City has recently taken ownership of the park from King County. Starfire Sports is a Washington State Not - for - Profit Corporation holding a 40 -year concession agreement with the City to construct and operate concessions in Fort Dent Park that will eventually include eight lighted soccer fields, four lighted softball diamonds, and one building with two indoor soccer fields and ancillary spaces. One lighted soccer field will have stadium bleacher seating (existing) for about 1,800 spectators. These facilities will be built and /or improved in phases, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 — Starfire Sports Complex Facilities Schedule Four Softball Diamonds In operation Three Synthetic Fields November 30, 2003 Stadium Synthetic Field November 30, 2003 Indoor Facility September 2004 Enhance Three Grass Fields 2005 -2010 Analysis Scenarios The analyses for this study were based on the three different scenarios discussed below and summarized in Table 2. The Average Day scenario will have some of the fields not in use, or used for practice with fewer players and spectators on hand. Because this will be by far the most usual operating condition, this scenario was used to determine impacts on the City's concurrency mitigation projects. C:\Documents and Settings \Owner \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files \OLKC5 \Final Parking Management Plan 11- 19- 03.docl November 21, 2003 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN The Combined Tournaments scenario will have large, local, 3 -day softball and soccer tournaments running simultaneously over a weekend. These tournaments will have higher traffic demand then regional or national tournaments where teams tend to arrive in larger vehicles with more participants per vehicle. This scenario was used as the basis for the level of service calculations for transportation concurrency because these tournaments will begin on a Friday and will add vehicular trips during the p.m. peak hour. Level of service was calculated for both existing and 2010 traffic volumes. The Capacity Stadium Event scenario assumes a match that would attract up to 1,800 spectators to the existing stadium bleacher seating. While such events will be infrequent, this scenario (together with a modified Average Day scenario described later) is used to evaluate the peak parking demand for the Starfire facility. Table 2 — Starfire Sports Complex Analysis Scenarios Average Day 344 Determination of impacts on mitigation projects Combined Tournaments 21 Concurrency level of service Capacity Stadium Event 12 Peak parking demand (in conjunction with a modified Average Day Scenario) PROJECT TRAFFIC Project Vehicle Trips For Transportation Concurrency Tables A -1 and A -2 in Appendix A summarize the maximum seasonal usage and the p.m. peak hour vehicle trip generation anticipated for all Starfire Sports Complex activities except stadium events. It is assumed that large stadium events will occur later in the evening or on weekends, and will not impact weekday peak period traffic operations. The information in Table A -1 includes an estimate of the number of players that would be on each field during the p.m. peak hour. The number of players is then multiplied by a factor to determine the additional number of spectators, and then by the number of fields in use to estimate the total number of people attending the Starfire Sports Complex during the p.m. peak hour. The factor for spectators has been modified since the Initial Traffic Impact Analysis (February 2003) from 0.50 to 0.35 for youth soccer based on trip generation data for the Twin Creeks Soccer Fields in Sunnyvale, California. After calculating the total number of people 2 November 21, 2003 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN attending the Complex, the number of entering and exiting vehicle trips were calculated based on assumptions for average car occupancy (ACO) and participant arrivals. Also added to the trip generation are the trips in Table A -2 associated with future support facilities (exercise area, day care, food court) housed in the indoor soccer building. These trips were estimated based on Land Use Code 495 (Recreational Community Center) from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The total trip generation for all facilities except the stadium is considered for this study to represent the Combined Tournaments scenario that includes concurrent multi -day soccer and softball tournaments that both start on a Friday prior to the p.m. peak hour. Table 3 lists all of the activities and vehicle trip generation included in the study under the Combined Tournaments scenario. Table 3 — Trip Generation for Combined Tournaments Scenario A Uri C Out (vpl Soccer Fields 10 Fields 181 63 Baseball Fields 4 Fields 82 8 Support Facilities 21 1,000 SF 13 24 SF = Square Feet; vph = Vehicles per Hour Project Traffic Distribution Project traffic for the Starfire Sports Complex was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based on an assumed uniform distribution of clientele for the Complex throughout the Greater Seattle area. This distribution included 15% and 25% coming from the north and south, respectively, via 1 -5 (ramping to 1 -405); 15% and 5% coming from the north and south, respectively, via Interurban Avenue/West Valley Highway; 5% coming from the west via SR 518/1 -405; and 35% coming from the east via 1 -405. PARKING ANALYSIS Existing Parking Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. Starfire Sports has also obtained a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant to use up to 450 existing paved and striped parking spaces on commercial properties immediately adjacent to the southern edge of Fort Dent Park. This would provide a total of 900 spaces on or adjacent to the project site, as shown in Table 4. 3 November 21, 2003 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Parking Demand Parking demand estimates for the Combined Tournaments, Average Day and Capacity Stadium Event scenarios described below are shown in Table 4. The peak period parking demand for the Combined Tournaments scenario is estimated to be the difference between entering and exiting traffic, or about 180 spaces. However, there are two other factors to consider. One is that the cycle time on most of the fields is between one and two hours, so the maximum parking needed could be twice the hourly need, or about 360 spaces. The second is that there will be some residual parking needed after each game to accommodate things such as team meetings, coaches' talks, and participants and fans that might stay for some or all of a following game. This latter demand has been estimated at another 90 spaces. In addition, about 50 spaces would be needed for staff and game officials for an approximate maximum demand of 500 spaces. This could result in a deficit of 50 parking spaces on site, but would be well within the available committed parking adjacent to the site. However, the traffic analysis assumed games started simultaneously on all outdoor fields to evaluate a worst -case condition. IStart-tirries-could-be-stagli in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand, perhaps eliminating the need for off site parking for this scenario. The peak period parking demand for the Average Day scenario is estimated to be about 30% of the Combined Tournaments scenario, or about 150 spaces. This is well within the 450 spaces available on the project site. This reduction factor is based on data from the proponent indicating the Average Day operation would be primarily practices with only one team on several of the fields, very few spectators at any field and virtually no game officials. It is anticipated that the highest single demand for parking will occur with the Capacity Stadium Event scenario where the 1,800 bleacher seats around Field No. 1 would be filled. This would require about 720 parking spaces. In addition, it was assumed that there would be some parking demand created by other daily activities at the Complex. However, recognizing the substantial parking demands for a Capacity Stadium Event, /it was assumed- the - other - Complex) (-facilities would be managed -to reduce the Average_Day_par king _demand_by- 50 %- to_7.5_spaces7 [during special_events? The resulting total parking demand during a Capacity Stadium Event would be 795 spaces, which is comfortably below the 900 total committed parking spaces available on and adjacent to the project site. PARKING PLAN SUMMARY Average Day Scenario • The 450 existing parking spaces at Fort Dent Park should easily accommodate the estimated Average Day scenario peak parking demand of 150 spaces for the day -to -day Starfire Sports Complex activities. No additional parking spaces are anticipated. November 21, 2003 R: \03011 \TrafficReport\Final Parking Management Plan \Table 4 - Final Parking Plan 11 -19 -03 9 ' 2 0 -I m 0) -0 >?2. >@w¥ 0 g E a g =_ V \ E CO % (D % 2 3� 3 2 CD 2 a) m § 7 ® O. m m fa —» o m m % 2 / m co E 2. 5c)50 £k§ / c K E i3/% 3 >0)CD Ag na =� �o� ?§- �_0.E.O�& § co E 2 q o mK�A�2z =2 a c o 2 m< 7 ] 2 C E 0 _. 0 = 0 co E 5 K D Q) %cam e35.a- ■ g co \ E / D Z c7 ..< t$u) 2��2 -. * m � . D -' ma 5m�c �� (D0-60 k E 0 2 = m to E 2)� k k k § § ■ o a ceg] \ co � / n 6 0 CL a z $0 0/0�. co c 0 0. E \g .(7 0 ƒE k¥ n _ (0 % / / co CO _ �2 CD § 5. 0) o CO , ) a \ CD 0 0 3 -0 x @ D 11 m @ -u 0 q @ @ 0 0 0 m E D 13 03 mm X4" � z 0 O m ■ 2 0 D 2 @ @ QIQ -% CONDITION NO. Average Day Parking (d) Combined Tournaments Parking (softball and soccer) (e) Capacity Stadium Event Parking: ANALYSIS SCENARIO DESCRIPTION �� 00 0 0 0 00 PARKIN DEMAN (Vehicle 0 o A.1=, oo AVAILABLE ON -SITE SPACES (a) k kk AVAILABLE ADJACENT SPACES (b) 0 00 PARKING DELTA (c) +or( -) @ D 11 m @ -u 0 q @ @ 0 0 0 m E D 13 03 mm X4" � z 0 O m ■ 2 0 D 2 @ @ STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN Combined Tournaments Scenario • Large, concurrent local soccer and softball tournaments could require some additional parking or proactive parking management in order to accommodate the estimated parking demand for 500 spaces. However, start times could be staggered in order to both minimize traffic peaking impacts and smooth out parking demand, perhaps eliminating the need for off site parking for this scenario. • Starfire Sports will be prepared to investigate preferential carpool parking, additional on- site parking or paid parking to bring the parking demand for this scenario into line with the available on -site parking, if possible. If this isn't possible, Starfire Sports has secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 450 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park. • There are also a number of flat, open areas around the park that could be configured for small amounts of temporary overflow parking,(if needed on weekdays during largJ tournaments- when -adjacent- commercial; parking might notbe available until evening] These open areas would likely be used to park staff and officials who are on site throughout the day and could utilize tight event parking configurations to optimize space. • Any off -site parkers would utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain access to the site. Capacity Stadium Event Scenario k 161° • Capacity events in the existing 1,800 -seat stadium will require additional parking and proactive parking management in order to accommodate the estimated parking demand forii s5 s5 paces. • Starfire Sports has secured a written Shared Parking Agreement and Covenant for up to 450 paved and striped parking spaces on commercial property immediately adjacent to the south edge of Fort Dent Park. These spaces would be available evenings and weekends to supplement the 450 existing spaces at the Complex, for a total of up to 900 available spaces. • At this-time-it is anticipated -that any Capacity- Stadiun "Evehts would be planned for_well after-the peak period on weekdays or on weekends to optimize the availability of off -site parking. • Off site parkers would utilize the exiting separated pedestrian trail around the commercial parking areas and the walkway on the existing park entrance bridge to gain access to the site. 6 November 21, 2003 STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN • 1Starfire Sports will _initiate_procedures_as_needed to encourage spectators for stadium events to carpool or use other modes of transportation to minimize parking demand. These procedures may include fees for parking, and clear communication of the parking situation and options in all participant applications, tickets and flyers for special events. • Ra_ffic_control workers_and_parking- attendants- would- beiprovided as needed to accommodate the ingress and egress of traffic to the Complex parking and adjacent parking areas for special stadium events. • fire Sports will_ partner_ with _as_man.y_hotels_as_possiblelto provide housing and transportation for participants that would reduce parking demand. Several hotels are within walking distance of the Complex utilizing existing and proposed trail facilities. 7 November 21, 2003 Starfire Sports Complex Parking Management Plan Appendix A Starfire Sports Complex P.M. Peak Hour Vehicle Trip Generation 55% Double Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 0% Bus 35% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour 0% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Jun - Aug Indoor Fields Adult Jun - Aug Synthetic Fields Youth Jun - Aug Grass Fields Adult Jun - Aug TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Apr - May Indoor Fields Adult Apr - May Synthetic Fields Youth Apr - May Grass Fields Adult Apr - May TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Feb - Mar Indoor Fields Adult Feb -Mar Synthetic Fields Youth Feb -Mar Grass Fields (No Lights) Feb -Mar TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Nov - Jan Synthetic Fields Youth Nov - Jan Grass Fields (No Lights) Nov - Jan TOTAL Indoor Fields Youth Sept - Oct Synthetic Fields Youth Sept - Oct Grass Fields (No Lights) Youth Sept - Oct Field Type Player Type Calendar Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Fri/Sat Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday Weekday 10 3D 7. 0 oc 5pm - 8pm 8pm - 12am 9am - 9pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 8pm -12am 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm v co v z3 3 3 o , ■ , N -0 N co 3 3 3 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm None 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 8pm 5pm - 6:30pm Hours of Use V N N -, V N N -. V N N -D V N -, V N z a 2 N O TABLE COMPLEX PM r Fields Trip Gei N N W OD 0 0 A co O O A co 0) Q O A Of + A O 1D ET 0 ..c a d "Il W N SON N OOO 46 A Atv N N NODO p1 A G O KWON N+ NOD O N O KWON N O o E GG KWON N O6G a ar N c O g w a a m O N Q—D V O N CO O V O N CO O V N DV —6 V N= N m T Z 01 5 O m 3 3 C g. N 3 B. C f0 O -, O 4- 00) c' CD O 4' 000 Owl 0001 O O 0 00070 pp�� A 0, 007 O 46 m"4 m y m 0 Pr x. ap O o+fa 3 ��,,ff A OD w T 0 52 O t��,,ff A 07 0'8 0 v+ co co O N7 O w+ co co O V A N N V O ON) A co D —I 0 x 3 D ---) O 1 0; � C x V et m C+o N �wO V W w N w W ov f7) Of N OwO v Ot 0) N Owv N -6 m W v N Total Inbound Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour O) o r 0) o 0) V O) V in CO Approximate Average Car Occupancy (ACO) O W N O V 185 W fw71 0 V N 0, O V N N V c0 0, V Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour O OvO OD O OvOf0 O OvO CO O c) it OD w V v tD Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour Adult Assumptions: 12 Players / Game 0.25 Spectators / Player at games 50% Single Occupancy Arrivals 25% Double Occupancy Arrivals 10% Multiple Occupancy Arrivals 10% Walk / Bike 5% Bus 10% of the Cars Drop Players Off During the PM Peak Hour Refrees and Starfire Staff arrive and leave outside of PM Peak Hour 1TOTAL Softball Fields Adult Jun - Auq TOTAL Softball Fields Adult Feb - May TOTAL Softball Fields Adult Sept - Jan • Field Type Player Type Calendar Weekday Weekday Weekday (D O. a 5pm- 9:OOpm 5pm- 9:OOpm wd00:9 -wdg Hours of Use TABLE A -1 )RTS COMPLEX PM PEAK HOUR TRIP r Softball Fields Trip Generation Summary 131 A A A A A A Z „C N N O 001 0 001 O 0 "m N 3 N n co D a DI A A A A co O T d ' _ g j (an 3 o N O = c x N N O co to 01 to 0) CO O) 0 0) O O m -0 ;0 k = g L g Q) (D J N A 124 -s N A 124 O O D -I 0 gm g = 7 O 0, -, co (0 O x 13 (D N N N N O O 0 "0 N -I 7 O C p) x a N N J m0 J J (0((0 J iv o . Average Occupancy Car (ACO) CO O CO N O • Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 8 CO CO 0 Total Outbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour TOTAL Soccer Fields Baseball Fields Field Type Jun - Aug Jun - Aug 0 o) CD CL 14 CO N N CO Total Car Trips Generated at PM Peak Hour Co N N O) Average Occupancy Car (ACO) 263 co W Total Inbound Car Trips at PM Peak Hour 7)o) o v 7c- co C mcn 7 0 o cn o 0' y o 0 n 73 - D 3 0 —1 — sx G) m m m Cn 0 N Z /�/�� VI 0 rn XX TDT 7 V � r m c y, cn m � cn c 7 m I.-Y 318V1 m 0 z CD gh W sd!J; meu le ;ol Ted leuo!Beu O N O Us CJ1 a) 0) r a c N CD 0 O st a ;ea uol ;ereueo P.M. Peak Hour Trip Generation for a Regional Park dC xi a a D) 3 IDCD • O a+� 0 o of 3 O c IV 4 n CD On O 3 N co 0 r° a O 0 0 3 d C/! 3 a — 3 Co to O0 N 0f .. c O a 'a 0 o o N co c D1 N to FDP CD � 3 7 a N C7 n N c o Q c pt N 7 p1 CL3 O. sdl.; Mau le ;ol Recreational Community Center A CO N V10 1S 0006 rn V CT W Ca A A w w V v r a c N CD 0 O N —1 Net! uol ;eieue Peak Hour Trip Generation for Recreationa iawao A}iunuauao3 Z-V 319V1 mco w D o cn o. CD n N Z n P CD jI SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT AND COVENANT This Shared Parking Agreement and Conant ( "Agreement ") is entered into this '''`day of /-1 j' , 2001K, between Starfire Sports; a Washington non- profit corporation ( "Starfire "), and John C. Radovich LLC ( "JCR "), a limited liability corporation organized and operating under the laws of the State of Washington. The Parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS 1.1 JCR owns property located at 6720 For Dent Way, Tukwila, Washington ( "Fort Dent One "), 6840 Fort Dent $lay, Tukwila, Washington ( "Fort Dent Two "), and at 7100 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila, Washington ("Fort Dent Three "). Collectively the three properties are referred to as the Fort Dent Properties (see Attachment 1 for legal descriptions). 1.2 Starfire plans to operate sports facilities at Fort Dent Park ( "Park ") in Tukwila, Washington. The Fort Dent Properties are connected to the Park and the. internal Park parking by a bridge that crosses the Green River. 1.3, The Fort Dent Parking is used primarily during the weekdays before 7:OOpm by JCR. Starfire seeks overflow parking for events taking place during the evening and on weekends. The Agreement is entered into for the purpose of sharing the Fort Dent Parking with Starfire. 2. SHARED PARKING ARRANGEMENT 2.1 Radovich covenants and agrees that for the term of the Agreement. the Fort Dent Parking may be used by Starfire on the weekdays after 7:00pm and on weekends, except that parking on the Fort Dent Three Property on Monday through Friday evening shall not be available to Starfire. 2.3 Tenants of the Fort Dent Properties shall be Riven priority off - hours access to the Fort Dent Parking. Starfire is responsible for management, maintenance, and cleanup of the Parking Facilities during the time it uses the Fort Dent Properties. Should landscaping, or other property, be damaged during the time it uses the Fort Dent Properties; Starfire shall be responsible for its repair. Starfire shall carry liability . insurance .. as appropriate and shall name John'.C. Radovich LLC as an additional insured. 2.4 Upon 48 hours advance notice to JCR, Starfire may be given access to available parking. 2.5 Starfire will provide JCR 50% of gr�dss revenues. JCR will donate its share of the proceeds to the Starfire scholarship program or to other charities of its choosing. Starfire will credit Mr. and Mrs. John C. Radovich with the donation. Starfire will provide JCR with an annual report acknowledging the, donation amount: 2.6 The agreement shall remain in effect for the mutual benefit of the parties, unless Starfire fails to satisfy its obligations hereunder. JCR shall have,the right to cancel this agreement, at its discretion, upon 30 days notice. 3. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 3.1 JCR and Starfire represent and warrant that they each possess the legal authority : to enter into this agreement, and that the person or persons signing the Agreement on their behalf are authorized to execute the Agreement and bind'•JCR and . Starfire. . . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties to this Agreement has had its authorized representative execute this document by affixing this signature in the appropriate space below. .John C. Radovich LLC "-/! . 0, C. Radovich, Manager • • . Starfire Sports By: Christopher G. Slatt, Chairman and President FEB 21 2dC3 STORM WATER DOWNSTREAM ANALYSIS Prepared for: STARFIRE SPORTS COMPLEX AT TUKWILA By: •' Essayons Consulting Engineers, Inc 2126 22nd St. SE Puyallup, WA 98372 -7116 EXPIRES:12 / 3 / a(/JI Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:devstar.tsf Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 1.85 4 2/09/01 2:00 1.28 7 1/05/02 16:00 2.27 2 2/27/03 7:00 1.12 8 8/26/04 2:00 1.41 6 10/28/04 16:00 1.94 3 1/18/06 16:00 1.79 5 11/24/06 3:00 4.00 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis Time Series File:prestar.tsf. Project Location:Sea -Tac - -- Annual Peak Flow Rates-- - Flow Rate Rank Time of Peak (CFS) 1.43 4 2/09/01 2:00 0.821 6 1/05/02 16:00 1.80 2 2/27/03 7:00 0.497 8 8/26/04 2:00 0.812 7 1/05/05 8:00 1.48 3 1/18/06 16:00 1.34 5 11/24/06 3:00 3.28 1 1/09/08 6:00 Computed Peaks Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 4.00 1 100.00 0.990 2.27 2 25.00 0.960 1.94 3 10.00 0.900 1.85 4 5.00 0.800 1.79 5 3.00 0.667 1.41 6 2.00 0.500 1.28 7 1.30 0.231 1.12 8 1.10 0.091 3.42 50.00 0.980 Flow Frequency Analysis - - Peaks - - Rank Return Prob (CFS) Period 3.28 1 100.00 0.990 1.80 2 25.00 0.960 1.48 3 10.00 0.900 1.43 4 5.00 0.800 1.34 5 3.00 0.667 0.821 6 2.00 0.500 0.812 7 1.30 0.231 0.497 8 1.10 0.091 2.79 50.00 0.980 Discharge Volume from Time Series devstar.tsf between 10/01/00 00:00 and 10/30/00 23:59 165344. Cu -Ft or 3.796 Ac -Ft in 30.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series prestar.tsf between 10 /01 /00 00:00 and 10/30/00 23:59 133789. Cu -Ft or 3.071 Ac -Ft in 30.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series devstar.tsf between 01/09/08 00:00 and 01/09/08 23:59 114085. Cu -Ft or 2.619 Ac -Ft in 1.0 days Discharge Volume from Time Series prestar.tsf between 01/09/08 00:00 and 01/09/08 23:59 98537. Cu -Ft or 2.262 Ac -Ft in 1.0 days 100 -year peak storm event differential in runoff volume is: • 114,085 - 98,537 = 15,548 cu. Ft. This basically equals the area required for pond size increase, since the live storage between outlet invert and pump on elevation is approximately 1 foot. STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION At Fort Dent Park Tukwila, Washington JKA John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering Ph: (253) 539 -1400 Fax: (253) 539 -1500 E -mail: jkacivil @comcast.net Drainage Report March 2008 DE V' ELO T STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION At Fort Dent Park Tukwila, Washington Drainage Report March 2008 JKA John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineering Ph: (253) 539 -1400 Fax: (253) 539 -1500 E -mail: jkacivil @comcast.net STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION, TUKWILA Drainage Report Prepared for: Bruce Dees & Associates 222 E. 26th Street Tacoma, WA 98421 253 - 627 -7947 Date: March 2008 Prepared by: John Knowles & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 1328 Puyallup, WA 98371 -0197 (253) 539 -1400 (253) 539 -1500 - Fax jkacivil@comcast.net JKA Project No.: 0810. JKA File No.: P: \JEKfiles \0810DR.doc REc 0 /APR 3 2 DEVELLOP�e �ENr inEs: 11 -10- 7.008 Professional Engineer's Certification: I hereby certify that this Drainage Report for Starfire Sports Expansion at Fort Dent Park has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets the minimum standards of City of Tukwila and normal standards of engineering practice. I understand that Tukwila does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of drainage facilities designed by me. Project Engineer: Scott Danielson Project Manager: John Knowles Table of Contents Page SECTION 1 - PROPOSED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 SECTION 2 - EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 SECTION 3 - SOILS 2 SECTION 4.- SUB -BASIN DESCRIPTION 2 SECTION 5 — FACILITY SIZING 3 Appendices A Vicinity Map A - 1 B Soil Map B - 1 C Except from FEMA FIRM Map C - 1 D Stormwater Calculations D -1 to D - 22 E Hydrology Map (EXISTING BASIN) E- 1 F Hydrology Map (DEVELOPED BASIN) F- 1 ii STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION, TUKWILA PART I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION Section 1 - Proposed Project Description The project site is located in the Northeast quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 04 East, of the Willamette Meridian, King County, Washington. It is located at Fort Dent Park in Tukwila at the following latitude and longitude: N 47°28'21", W122°15'04". The proposal is to replace the existing softball fields with four soccer fields. The fields are located in the northern most portion of Fort Dent Park. The fields are bounded to the north and west by the Green River, to the east by railroad right -of -way, and to the south by the existing park and parking areas. Three of four proposed soccer fields will have synthetic turf and the forth and largest field will have natural grass for regulation soccer tournaments. The fields will be constructed with a level finish grade at elevation 17.0 and all fields will have subdrainage systems installed. Subdrains will consist of 4" perforated pipe set in gravel filled underdrain trenches. The underdrain systems will slope at 0.5% to an 8" perforated collector pipe. The collector pipe will slope at 0.5% and convey the drainage southerly to a Type 2 catch basin with a flow restrictor device (multi- orifice standpipe) to restrict the flows prior to release to the existing city detention pond located south of the fields. A new asphalt concrete parking lot (40 stalls) will be constructed on the southeast side of the fields. The parking lot is graded at a 2- percent slope toward the pond. Parking lot runoff will sheet flow across the vegetated area between the parking lot and the pond. The vegetated area provides a distance greater than 80 feet for the runoff to sheet flow; this distance should provide adequate runoff treatment for the small parking area. The parking area is counted as "bypass area" for the hydraulic analysis of the underdrain system. The bypass area runoff plus the restricted release rates from the underdrain system will remain equal or less than "existing condition" flows into the pond. The hydraulic analysis uses a continuous model computer program as described in greater detail in Section 5 of this report. Section 2 - Existing Conditions Site topography is relatively flat as is typical with softball fields. The fields were last reconstructed in 1996 (that included an improved underdrain system). The fields previous to the 1996 reconstruction also had an underdrain sytem. The underdrain system drains to the existing City detention pond located southeast of the softball fields. The existing pond is approximately 1.5 acres and has a bottom elevation at approximately 4.0 feet. The water surface elevation was at 7.7 feet as measured on November 25, 2002. The pond discharges via a pump system into the Green River. The park and field area are protected from Green River high water levels by a dike that exists along the riverbank north and west of the fields. The ordinary high water elevation of the river adjacent to the field is approximately at 5.0 feet. John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Page 1 March 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION, TUKWILA The Green River 100 -year flood elevation along the site ranges from elevations 19.0 and 20.0 according to FEMA FIRM Panel # 53033C0957F and # 53033C0976F (See Appendix 'C'). All portions of the site are mapped as "Zone AE" (areas with base flood elevation determined) per FEMA. Section 3 - Soils The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Soil Survey for King County maps the onsite soils as Newberg silt loam (Ng) and Woodinville silt loam (Wo). NRCS rates the Newberg series as B type and the Woodinville series as D type soils. The Woodinville series is located in the SE corner, of the project area (consisting of about 25% of the site) and the Newberg series is located over the balance of the site. See Appendix 'B'. Table III -1 of the KCRTS manual states: "These are alluvial soils, some of which are underlain by glacial till or have a seasonally high water table. In the absence of detailed study, these soils should be treated as till soils." Therefore, from a runoff analysis standpoint, zero infiltration is assumed for the "developed" condition. Section 4 — Sub Basin Description Refer to Appendix E and F for maps of the existing and developed condition basin areas. For the hydraulic analysis, the total area considered is 10.84 acres. The existing basin is comprised of the following: • 1.35 acres of infield sand • 0.89 acres impervious surfaces (walkways, concrete pads, roofs, etc) • 8.60 acres of grass The developed basin is comprised of the following: • 1.26 acres pervious (porous) pavement • 4.28 acres synthetic turf field (100% permeable) w/ underdrain • 3.33 acres natural grass field w/ underdrain • 0.03 acres gravel surface • 1.21 acres lawn area (no underdrain) • 0.03 acres roof area • 0.07 acres asphalt concrete pavement The developed bypass basin (ie, Parking Lot) is comprised of: • 0.40 acres asphalt concrete pavement • 0.10 acres cement concrete pavement • 0.13 acres lawn area John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Page 2 March 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION, TUKWILA Section 5 — Facility Sizing See Appendix 'D' for stormwater calculations. The facility is sized using WWHM3 (Western Washington Hydrology Model, version 3), which is DOE's current continuous event simulation computer model. It is similar to KCRTS (King County Runoff Time Series) in that it is based on the HSPF model. WWHM3 is considered equivalent to HSPF and KCRTS. WWHM3 was used instead of KCRTS because of the nature of the storage for this facility. The storage volume available is within the perforated pipe and voids of the pea gravel in the subdrain trenches. These trenches are laid at grades of 0.5% and are at varying lengths. The stage- storage relationship for the trenches is awkward to model using KCRTS since it only allows input of standard type volume structures, such as regular shaped ponds and vaults. WWHM3 allows the input of a custom stage- storage table, which works well with this unique type of drainage system: The 10.84 acre existing basin as described in the previous section was input as "Predevl" with the following land use and areas: • 0.89 acres of paved driveways (flat) • 9.95 acres of Lawn (flat) over till soils In WWHM3, "flat" refers to ground slopes between 0 and 5 %. Note that the infield sand (1.35 ac) is modeled as lawn. (1.35 acres sand + 8.60 acres grass = 9.95 acres.) The existing basin was modeled as till soils due to the recommendation by the KCRTS Manual Table III -1 (previously described in Section 3). Developed basin area drainage tributary to the flow control structure was input as "Developedl" with the following land use and areas: • 1.26 acres impervious dispersed over till soils (This was selected to model the pervious porous pavement areas) • 8.82 acres lawn (flat) over till soils (This is to model the 3.33 acres of natural grass and 4.28 acres of synthetic turf and 1:21 acres lawn.) • 0.13 acres driveway (flat) (This is the roof, pavement, and gravel areas combined) The bypass basin was named "Bypass" with the following land use and areas: . • 0.5 acres impervious (paved driveway and parking lot areas). • 0.13 acres lawn (flat) over till soil. The storage volumes within the pea gravel trenches were calculated using an average end area method in an Excel spreadsheet and the storage volumes were input into a stage- storage table for use in the WWHM3 program. A void ratio of 0.35 was used for calculating the storage volumes. John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Page 3 March 2008 STARFIRE SPORTS EXPANSION, TUKWILA The table used in WWHM3 is named "SSD Table 1" and consists of area, storage, discharge, and infiltration. In general, at every half -foot stage the volume and discharge is calculated and input to create the SSD table. The storage volume is input in acre -feet, discharge in cfs, and infiltration in cfs; however, for these calculations, no infiltration is assumed to occur within the pea gravel trenches. Infiltration is likely to occur, but since it is not accounted for, the flow into the existing pond should even be less than what the model predicts, thus the design can be considered to be conservative. Conclusion — The objective of this drainage design is to ensure that the peak rates of runoff from the fields to the City detention pond do not increase from existing conditions. Using the WWHM3 model to simulate continuous event runoff, collected and stored within the proposed pea gravel subdrain system, is a conservative and practical approach. Furthermore, the model assumes that zero infiltration will occur beneath the fields; but, in reality, some infiltration is likely to occur as runoff is backed up (stored) upstream of the control structure. John Knowles & Associates, Inc. Page 4 March 2008 APPENDIX A Vicinity Map APPENDIX B Soil Map :2 �.. e2't6.se.:a. ,.._�a.+,�'e ^ ate,• Area of Interest (AOI) Ul v in oo u _ t C rp .0 L. o LL 0)) '0 u V- w a m w C al o D m rn m o C fa N L t_ w 0 J v 73' � ❑ ❑ ❑ *' o To To 'a I U) 44mmuu❑Z m U ❑ _❑ r❑ ❑D ❑00❑ w v► m f a Political Features CU 01 r_ N -0 sn U o c c w ^p w • U r�o 3 d es 'b O V 0 a) ,.■ 0 'U V n.= 1' u)U)u ^E ❑a❑❑❑❑2 G o Urban Areas a APPENDIX C Excerpt from FEMA FIRM Map <^� �.i�. �eri;�t BY 100 -YEAR FLOOD ,,,,.,,7$ki rr:;'t. �•x..; In ,- , s' ..7�"rYJ ;ia S}'�F�' �,R ZONE A No hale' flood eIrcationsdetermined. • �.;��y.�g.A 4,4:4-,: ZONE AE Base Hood cloeation +determined. q., q'v�' Y �`xlc ? s X:µ' ' 3: s ZONE AH Flo <xl depths of 1 to 3 feel +u.ualh arc. `•t' t...xry' .i`e�A- :V.4,-41.-61,- i �' iU rtl pondingl; base Bond cice�Nior \ /.., ,V4,.:1-'' N".:4';':•4111$.• ;r y xi.:.•sc r � determined. • w -.1 P -I PUMPING iVa„..;,,,,,,,. 1 , a4 i: - . STATION 17..1 ' < � a I. ^ $ E'•it':' x t r— ,�-+ ->". ?' r e ice••" a t15'�tola" ► • 4 NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM • NI ../ °. '1• ,c "S+. r � 12 ,."a tom' ° p `.{tai a s A� 57�' �'e?Ft 'ttC?SPA' aF 't., rK T S'", RM329 ` �"� r.- s'k'"xff- s 4.A. •a t ./S. 7. yi. 4' s ' 4` ;� ZONE AE FIRM • /' r r-i; '�'n rl r - i▪ .J _ MO . Sa rE v j' `� :: � .:7,' 2,', W f'.:#:0 °� ' , 4, ,. =g fjt FLOOD INSURANCE RATE .MAP 1 f i #,.,2;:- ¢•`•' °'3J•1 �Sj wt ,r?e�r r' tl: 1.41n rf s ///-- ,t"'41,,r • vk "'} 4, %e„ ,y •r • a; qef 1, .r ; ?}v5, a s,,t '..ar1'tpt,..4- `...4f- . d v, ��` ?� ,¢- _.; 4, ., ;1te #,rd, i r+,.. KING COUNTY • a�et` seas ,rte.. Gtx :v rog.ik.,. - -.61.k st+X..3� Yy" „ : F.0 ;4 .". , :.t; "r �`` � k °2 #, :z4, = - �T,g.l.5.t t. .te,.,. • WASHINGTON AND W 9s'J+,e .s:: -��' k.�' ,- '`k ` ▪ y4, <4..., 90.. 1�- 'i-- �t"°`k J,t,.— :::,04 .4.1 INCORPORATED AREAS . NJ Le t N�EB #^,. r>3 t_ ; 1 OONgi''AE( i'4. 1„ O y, # t.Q � ��.t • a O f\°tt a Cam` .. ; 'Y a °'it 't:.?t�' t to , V sYy# � �' nj's S �� ,sj . ,.0 �� �,'fi," i ��� $ sl` PANEL 916 OF 1125 • s~s wM�v • r ft3t v,Ntq ''. (SEE MAP INDEX FOR PANELS NOT PRINTEDI _,a,. 'k iT•' - .% ZJ. ° d 4 .if , •a sY %r+^ `; t7 ,i e-r r ?'.r.. N/ ? - 4P G \O w..!'yN,,y.. o.11� 3rd'/ �'E rl ,, # ...$1• I....,;,',.,c4,1/1..x',, i£ /5r • i�, •.•-• t" k ff, 7 ,.P'� ,r * CONTAINS: V1 ? rr'.�`'3 YZ�!��,3 F x t 4 •*'' COMMUNITY • NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX V : 153Q09i: y f' < �' i5 >`; � -,.,, +' f', <a r Tt a�Fs..� ONO COUNTY. . �, - } Y t y � osoo CITY o AREAS 5300e1 6978 6 �T.. ,�' REMDN.Cm' OF 536086 6976 F 1►f ZONE AEa G t ya} �$��, CITY OF REr SEATTLE. 569 �T6 F Y T 1 �- { a'Si Y0. L F "t, vL 4w TUI(Y6N (TfY (# 530Mt 0976 F * K .�oN1_ `X tkG ., {�� � �,�,,�� �rir 530088 .i.".,cF "i.0 ?_ -ate, r i E,g,st a' r`,,, -e**lf, ,.:0 "'F' -i;;, �F 3f J'• Jas �`3 S�a'fJ;�`,\ T - ..: tf o ' • r• �;g�� • ' ZONE X ;�. • �_" 3 t s+ F: r ,,,, ; UNION RENTON WASTEW/ MAP NUMBER • �b6't fs 7.� Fg_ , r _t1 S7 /PACIFIC© 53033C0916 F r, tn..t L „...A-;• :',,.:17i.;!:-:” ,-� l� •- ,:`¢ Sie:I,} lc ^ • .tom s �, J -. ''s F ' MAP REVISED: j :�t,,. 4• ,,i ;"TZ4N'aE. ;,,' � ` !§. �\ �� MAY 16,1995 • ,y ., tc, ; =`, %'•� ZONE 47 °28'07" Td'L E, , Ya >�<' ZONE X ;,,` AE. �� - 10 Federal Emergency Management Agency • 122 °15'00" • This is an official copy of a portion of the abase referenced flood map. It • was extracted using F -MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title dock. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov APPENDIX D Stormwater Calculations Western Washington Hydrology Model PROJECT REPORT Project Name: STARFIRE -0810 Site Address: Fort Dent City : Tukwila Report Date : 4/1/2008 Gage : Seatac Data Start' : 1948/10/01 Data End : 1998/09/30 Precip Scale: 1.00 PREDEVELOPED LAND USE Name : Predevl Bypass: N GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use Acres ✓- C, Lawn, Flat 9.95 Impervious Land Use Acres DRIVEWAYS FLAT 0.89 ✓ 1 D -I Element Flows To: Surface Interflow Groundwater Name : Developed 1 Bypass: No GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use C, Lawn, Flat C IMP DISP FLAT Impervious Land Use DRIVEWAYS FLAT Acres 8.82 1.26 Acres 0.13 Element Flows To: Surface Interflow SSD Table 1, SSD Table 1, Groundwater Name : BYPASS ' Bypass: Yes GroundWater: No Pervious Land Use Acres Vbl.OtKE (Ac) (pep... -3- P--3 Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Year Predeveloped Mitigated 1950 0.846 0.711 ' 1951 1.954 1.049 1952 1.050 0.918 1953 0.543 0.409. 1954 0.443 0.384 ' 1955 0.680 0.452 1956 0.845 0.720 1957 0.831 0.549 5 D -5 1958 0.939 0.679 1959 0.661 0.446 1960 0.486 0.389 1961 0.919 0.823 1962 0.608 0.435 1963 0.441 0.312 1964 0.621 0.409 1965 0.711 0.493 1966 0.533 0.410 1967 0.603 0.400 1968 0.977 0.761 1969 0.871 0.436 1970 0.596 0.443 1971 0.627 0.458 1972 0.652 0.427 1973 1.285 0.961 1974 0.537 0.422 1975 0.676 0.401 1976 1.098 0.720 1977 0.647 0.441 1978 0.406 0.323 1979 0.796 0.475 1980 0.439 0.308 1981 0.898 0.666 1982 0.829 0.495 1983 1.520 1.067 1984 0.611 0.466 1985 0.638 0.390 1986 0.423 0.376 1987 1.094 0.884 1988 1.006 0.905 1989 0.427 0.369. 1990 0.374 0.335 1991 2.074 . 1.564 1992 1.749 1.333 1993 0.617 0.491 1994 0.443 0.384 1995 0.264 0.223 1996 0.585 0.488 1997 1.298 1.017 1998 0.998 0.889 1999 0.771 0.418 Ranked Yearly Peaks for Predeveloped and Mitigated. POC #1 Rank Predeveloped Mitigated 1 2.0736 1.5643 2 1.9541 1.3328 3 1.7488 1.0667 4 1.5201 1.0486 5 1.2976 1.0166 6 1.2851 0.9615 7 1.0983 0.9181 8 1.0941 0.9054 9 1.0503 0.8894 10 1.0056 0.8838 11 0.9982 0.8227 12 0.9771 0.7610 13 0.9388 0.7201 14 0.9188 0.7200 15 0.8981 0.7112 16 0.8714 0.6791 17 0.8464 0.6664 18 0.8454 0.5489 19 0.8306 0.4953 20 0.8289 0.4933 21 0.7956 0.4908 22 0.7712 0.4884 23 0.7109 0.4748 24 • 0.6802 0.4660 6 D -7 0.7121 131 97 74 Pass 0.7277 123 89 .72 Pass ' 0.7432 112 78 69 Pass 0.7588 104 74 71 Pass 0.7743 95 65 68 Pass 0.7899 0.8054 0.8209 0.8365 0.8520 0.8676 0.8831 0.8987 0.9142 0.9297 0.9453 0.9608 0.9764 0.9919 1.0074 1.0230 1.0385 1.0541 1.0696 1.0852 1.1007 1.1162 1.1318 1.1473 1.1629 1.1784 1.1939 1.2095 1.2250 1.2406 1.2561 1.2717 1.2872 1.3027 1.3183 87 58 66 Pass 80 52 65 Pass 75 47 62 Pass 69 40 57 Pass 61 34 55 Pass 56 28 50 Pass 50 25 50 Pass 49 22 44 Pass 47 18 38 Pass 41 17 41 Pass 38 17 44 Pass 35 17 48 Pass 35 16 45 Pass 30 14 46 Pass 26 14 53 Pass 25 12 48 Pass 24 12 50 Pass 22 10 45 Pass 20 9 45 Pass. 18 9 50 Pass 16 9 56 Pass 16 8 50 Pass 16 7 43 Pass 15 7 46 Pass 15 7 46 Pass 13 7 53 Pass 12 7 58 Pass 12 7 58 Pass 11 6 54 Pass 11 6 54 Pass 11 6 54 Pass 11 6 54 Pass 10 5 50 Pass 9 5 55 Pass 9 5 55 Pass 9 1.3338 9 4 44 Pass 1.3494 8 4 50 Pass 1.3649 8 4 50 Pass 1.3804 8 4 50 Pass 1.3960 8 3 37 Pass 1.4115 8 3 37 Pass 1.4271 8 3 37 Pass 1.4426 8 3 37 Pass 1.4582 7 3 42 Pass 1.4737 7 3 42 Pass 1.4892 7 3 42 Pass 1.5048 7 2 28 Pass 1.5203 7 2 28 Pass 1.5359 6 2 33 Pass 1.5514 6 2 33 Pass 1.5670 6 0 0 Pass 1.5825 6 0 0 Pass 1.5980 6 0 0 Pass 1.6136 6 0 0 Pass 1.6291 6 0 0 Pass 1.6447 6 0 0 Pass 1.6602 5 0 0 Pass 1.6757 5 0 0 Pass 1.6913 5 0 0 Pass 1.7068 5 0 0 Pass 1.7224 5 0 0 Pass 1.7379 5 0 0 Pass 1.7535 4 0 0 Pass 1.7690 4 0 0 Pass 1.7845 4 0 0 Pass 1.8001 4 0 0 Pass 1.8156 3 0 0 Pass 1.8312 3 0 0 Pass 1.8467 3 0 0 Pass 1.8622 3 0 0 Pass 1.8778 3 0 0 Pass 1.8933 2 0 0 Pass Water Quality BMP Flow and Volume for POC 1. On -line facility volume: 0 acre -feet On -line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. .Off -line facility target flow: 0 cfs. Adjusted for 15 min: 0 cfs. This program and accompanying documentation is provided 'as -is' without warranty of any kind. The entire risk regarding the performance and results of this program is assumed by the user. Clear Creek Solutions and the Washington State Department of Ecology disclaims all warranties, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to implied warranties of program and accompanying documentation. In no event shall Clear Creek Solutions and /or the Washington State Department of Ecology be liable for any damages whatsoever (including without limitation to damages for Toss of business profits, loss of business information, business interruption, and the like) arising out of the use of, or inability to use this program even if Clear Creek Solutions or the Washington State Department of Ecology has been advised of the possibility of such damages. - 12 - D -f2 1.89 1.51 1.12 0.74 0.35 10E -4 PREDEVELOPED FLOW MITIGATED FLOW 10E -9 10E -2 10E -1 1 10 100 Per �rrt Ti m E ri g D -1'5 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 5771C7E vs Smg,4GE ELEV. ELEV. VOLUME (CF) VOLUME (AC -FT) 0.000 9.24 0.00 0.000000 0.760 10.00 1.18 0.000027 1.760 11,00 69.40. 0.001593 2.760 12.00 243.00 0.005579 3.760 13.00 521.00 0.011961 4.260 13.50 1159.00 0.026607 4.760 14.00 2935.00 0.067378 5.260 14.50 4850.00 0.111341 5.760 15.00 9226.00 0.211800 6.260 15.50 12781.00 0.293411 6.760 16.00 16324.00 0.374747 r• S 54erselpire EL 4/1/2008 0810 - VOLUME 1Descrip. 1 Start El. ORIFICE STRUCTURE' Increment 0.10 ft 1 0.0000 ft Max El. 6.7600 ft! 0rif Coeff 0.62 !Lowest Orif El • Lowest Diam 2.5000 in Dist to next 1132 116.0000 in Dist to next 0.00 4.5000 if o.0000 0.0000j 0.7000 ft 0.8000 ft 1.7000 ft 1.8000 ft 0.0000 cfs!, 0.1419 cfsl 0.1517 cfs1 0.2211 cfsj dr-.76) GI .147 as 1.76, 62 0.224 as 0.2276 cfs 1 2.7000 ft 2.8000 ft 3:7000 ft 3.8000' ft 0.2787 cfsl 0.2838 cfs 0.3262 cfsi 4.2000ft 14.3000 ft 4.7000 ft 0.3306 cfs 0.3476 cfs 0.3517 cfs; 4.8000 ft' 5.2000 ft 5.3000 ft 5.7000 ft 1.4751 cfs' 5.8000 ft .1.5223 cfs 16.2000 fti 1.6961 cfs 63000 ft 1.7364 cfsl 6.4000 1111.7757 cfsl 6.5000 ft] 1.8140 cfs] 6.6000 fti 1.8514 cfsl 16:7600 *11.9044 cfsl 0.8046 cfs1 {0.9067 cfsi 1.2041 cfs 1.2643 cfsl 0, Z80 cP5 3.76, 4,33.c5 0.3s 40 q.76, Q= be 85 dits sac, Q 1.2 3 e45 576) Q.7./.5" (145 6,269 Q.g,7I7 Cs telo eP5 Licensed to: John Knowles & Assoc. 4/1/2008 Starfire Soccer • Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L1 -L28 272 14.53 13.17 14.36 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.23 2.25 1.74 165.65 ' 4638.14 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Trench Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L29 -L54 Effective 14.63 13.17 Upper Lower Trench 1.16 Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L1 -L28 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 162.51 L1 -L28 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 713.76 L1 -L28 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 1632.51 L1 -L28 272 14.53 13.17 14.36 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.48 1.50 0.99 94.25 2638.94 L1 -L28 272 14.53 13.17 14.36 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.86 1.88 1.37 129.95 3638.54 L1 -L28 272 14.53 13.17 14.36 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.23 2.25 1.74 165.65. 4638.14 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L29 -L54 292 14.63 13.17 14.46__ 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.16 2.25 _ 1.70 174.00 4523.88 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Trench Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L55 Effective 15.30 13.17 Upper Lower Trench 16.00 _ Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L29 -L54 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 150.90 L29 -L54 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 662.78 L29 -L54 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 1515.90 L29 -L54 292 14.63 13.17 14.46 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.41 1.50 0.95 97.35 2530.98 L29 -L54 292 14.63 13.17 14.46 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.78 1.88 1.33 135.67 3527.43 L29 -L54 292 14.63 13.17 14.46 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.16 2.25 1.70 174.00 4523.88 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L55 425 15.30 13.17 15.13 13.00 _ 0.75 16.00 _ 0.66 2.25 1.45 216.15 216.15 D -p 4/1/2008 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L55 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L55 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L55 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L55 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 104.24 L55 425 15.30 13.17 15.13 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.28 1.88 1.08 160.37 160.37 L55 425 15.30 13.17 15.13 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.66 2.25 1.45 216.15 216.15 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench . IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L56 -L65 411 15.23 13.17 15.06 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.71 _ 2.25 1.48 212.81 2128.08 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L56 -L65 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 58.04 L56 -L65 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 254.91 L56 -L65 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 583.04 L56 -L65 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 1042.41 L56 -L65 411 15.23 13.17 15.06 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.33 1.88 1.10 158.86 1588.64 L56 -L65 411 15.23 13.17 15.06 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.71. 2.25 1.48 212.81 2128.08 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L66 407 15.21 13.17 15.04 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.72 2.25 1.49 211.81 211.81 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE. Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L66 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L66 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L66 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L66 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 104.24 L66 407 15.21 13.17 15.04 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.35 1.88 1.11 158.39 158.39 L66 407 15.21 13.17 15.04_ 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.72 2.25 1.49 211.81 211.81 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L67 -L72 383 15.09 13.17 14.92 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.81375 2.25 1.53 205.35 1232.09 2 p -,7 Trench Trench Upper Lower Trench Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water . U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL 2 p -,7 4/1/2008 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs L67 -L72 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 34.82 L67 -L72 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 152.95 L67 -L72 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 349.82 L67 -L72 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 625.45 L67 -L72 383 15.09 13.17 14.92 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.44 1.88 1.16 155.08 930.47 L67 -L72 383 15.09 13.17 14.92_ 13.00 0.75 __ 16.00 0.81 2.25 1.53 205.35 1232.09 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L73 368 15.01 13.17 14.84 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.87 2.25 1.56 200.93 200.93 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Trench Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L74 366 15.00 13.17 Upper Lower Trench 16.00 Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L73 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L73 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L73 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L73 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 104.24 L73 368 15.01 13.17 14.84 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.50 1.88 1.19 152.63 152.63 L73 368 15.01 13.17 14.84 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.87 _ 2.25 1.56 200.93 200.93 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L74 366 15.00 13.17 _ 14.83 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.8775 2.25 1.56 200.32 200.32 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L74 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L74 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 'L74 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L74 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.13 1.50 0.81 104.24 104.24 L74 366 15.00 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.50 1.88 1.19 152.28 152.28 L74 366 15.00_ 13.17 14.83 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.88 2.25 1.56 200.32 200.32 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L75 361 14.98 13.17 14.81 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.89625 2.25 1.57 198.76 198.76 Lateral No. • Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L75 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 __ 13.50 0.13 0.38. 0.25 5.80 5.80 3 4/1/2008 L75 L75 L75 L75 L75 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs Lateral No. Length (ft) Lateral No. 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 361 14.98 13.17 14.81 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.15 1.50 0.82 104.00 104.00 361 14.98 13.17 14.81 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.52 1.88 1.20 151.38 151.38 361 14.98 13.17 14.81 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.90 2.25 1.57 198.76 198.76 Lateral No. Length (ft) Lateral No. Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (GO TOTAL L76 355 14.95 13.17 14.78 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.92 2.25 1.58 196.86 196.86 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 Lateral No. Length (ft) Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L76 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L76 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L76 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L76 355 14.95 13.17 14.78 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.17 1.50 0.83 103.67 103.67 L76 355 14.95 13.17 14.78 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.54 1.88 1.21 150.26 150.26 L76 355 14.95 13.17 14.78 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.92 2.25 _ 1.58 196.86 196.86 _ Lateral No. Length (ft) Lateral No. Length. (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L77 347 14.91 13.17 14.74 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.94875 2.25 1.60 194.24 194.24 14.00 13.17 13.83 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L77 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L77 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L77 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L77 347 14.91 13.17 14.74 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.20 1.50 0.85 103.16 103.16 L77 347 14.91 13.17 14.74 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.57 1.88 1.22 148.70 148.70 L77 347 14.91 13.17 14.74 13.00 0.75 __ 16.00 0.95 2.25 1.60 194.24 194.24 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper • IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L78 335 14.85 13.17 14.68_ 13.00 0.75 16.00 0.99375 2.25 1.62 190.16 190.16 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L78 , 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13. 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L78 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L78 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L78 335 14.85 13.17 14.68 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.24 1.50 0.87 102.23 102.23 L78 335 14.85 13.17 14.68 13.00 0.75 15.50 Q.62 1.88 1.25 146.20 146.20 4 D-t9 4/1/2008 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs I L78 1 335 1 14.85 1 13.17 1 14.68 1 13.00 l 0.75 1 16.00 1 0.99 1 2.25 1 1.62 1 190.16 1 190.16 I Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L79 320 14.77 13.17 14.60 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.05 2.25 1.65 184.80 184.80 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Trench Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L80 298 14.66 13.17 Upper Lower Trench 16.00 Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L79 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L79 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L79 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L79 320 14.77 13.17 14.60 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.30 1.50 0.90 100.80 100.80 L79 320 14.77 13.17 14.60 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.68 1.88 1.28 142.80 142.80 L79 320 14.77 13.17 14.60 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.05 2.25 1.65 184.80 184.80 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L80 298 14.66 13.17 14.49 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.1325 2.25 1.69 176.40 176.40 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Trench Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L81 299 14.67 13.17 Upper Lower Trench 16.00 Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L80 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0:13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L80 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L80 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L80 298 14.66 13.17 14.49 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.38 1.50 0.94 98.17 98.17 L80 298 14.66 13.17 14.49 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.76 1.88 1.32 137.28 137.28 L80 298 14.66 13.17 14.49 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.13 2.25 1.69 176.40 176.40 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L81 299 14.67 13.17 14.50 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.12875 2.25 1.69 176.79 176.79 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf. (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (GO EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L81 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L81 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L81 266 14.50 13.17 14.33 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.13 1.13 0.63 58.30 58.30 L81 299 14.67 13.17 14.50 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.38 1.50 0.94 98.31 98.31 L81 299 14.67 13.17 14.50 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.75 1.88 1.31 137.55 137.55 L81 299 14.67 __ 13.17 14.50 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.13 2.25 _ 1.69 176.79 176.79 5 P -Z0 4/1/2008 Starfire Soccer Tukwila, WA 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Upper Trench IE Lower Trench IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at U/S End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench. Vol. (cf) EACH Trench Vol. (cf) TOTAL L82 263 14.49 13.17 14.32 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.26375 2.25 1.76 161.72 161.72 6 p -zi Trench Trench Upper Lower Trench Area at Area at Avg. Trench Trench Lateral Length Upper Lower Trench Trench Width Water U/S End D/S End Area Vol. (cf) Vol. (cf) No. (ft) IE IE IE IE (ft) Surf. (ft) (s.f.) (s.f.) (s.f.) EACH TOTAL L82 66 13.50 13.17 13.33 13.00 0.75 13.50 0.13 0.38 0.25 5.80 5.80 L82 166 14.00 13.17 13.83 13.00 0.75 14.00 ' 0.13 0.75 0.44 25.49 25.49 L82 263 14.49 13.17 14.32 13.00 0.75 14.50 0.14 1.13 0.63 58.16 58.16 L82 263 14.49 13.17 14.32 13.00 0.75 15.00 0.51 1.50 1.01 92.68 92.68 L82 263 14.49 13.17 14.32 13.00 0.75 15.50 0.89 1.88 1.38 127.20 127.20 L82 263 14.49 13.17 14.32 13.00 0.75 16.00 1.26 2.25 1.76 161.72 161.72 6 p -zi STARFIRE SOCCER FIELD TUKWILA, WA SUBDRAIN 0810- VOL- subdrain -calcs TRENCH LATERALS 4/1/2008 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Trench Width (ft) Top Trench Elev (ft) Trench Area at Upstream End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 16.00 4.60 9.23 6.91 1492.48 Lateral No. Effective Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf.(ft) Trench Area at Upstream End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) L83 30.00 10.00 9.85 1.50 10.00 0.00 0.23 0.11 1.18 L83 230.00 11.00 9.85 1.50 11.00 0.00 1.73 0.86 69.43 L83 430.00 12.00 9.85 1.50 12.00 0.00 3.23 1.61 242.68 L83 617.00 12.94 9.85 1.50 13.00 0.10 4.73 2.41 520.71 Lateral No. Length (ft) Upper IE Lower IE Trench Width (ft) Water Surf.(ft) Trench Area at Upstream End (s.f.) Trench Area at D/S End (s.f.) Avg. Area (s.f.) Trench Vol. (cf) L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 13.50 0.85 5.48 3.16 682.67 L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 14.00 1.60 6.23 3.91 844.63 L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 14.50 2.35 6.98 4.66 1006.60 L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 15.00 3.10 7.73 5.41 1168.56 L83 617 12.94 9.85. 1.50 15.50 3.85 8.48 6.16 1330.52 L83 617 12.94 9.85 1.50 16.00 4.60 9.23 6.91 1492.48 -2Z APPENDIX E Existing Condition Hydrology Map APPENDIX F Developed Condition Hydrology Map L7D- 39S.�'� L75 i81 ' . • .+rem, - INNEMIIIIMENIMINIEVONE L,D4272' i`' 0k$ iiT '. !411 '' 'I'. — ;�`l iii rim • Lae- ,..,•..... L8M.411' PERVIOUS CONCRETE WMRWAY'- ,.2E owes SrN1XEnC TURF FIELD - 4?D cave NATURAL CRASS MELD W/ UIOFRDRAIN - 3.33 ewes CRAWL SURFACE - 0.03 rive LAVA IAEA (NO WIDERDRNN) - 1.21 acne ROOF AREA - 003 woe ASPHALT -AREA - 0.07 acne - - Minim= LS, MIA 110M11111 MIRE& LN1 AMUR smaimens _AIL I �` > - P" s i ' rttA 1iY ate- 17'71'1: �.�r •II c - vw .••w..w..- awaaawa.aw >-- - s.., � _t "�'TN ..ak+a�..w .. ,.��__ver.._•. ..veawuvawa r�ra+ur w.wia \!? .r..W.:Q _1 •gym.. —�- :s:p. r • GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLEX SOUTH END OF FORT DENT PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON prepared for: STARFIRE SPORTS by: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200301-REPORT 1 February 15, 2003 to ;Pitirtgin Services • • km 0,00 "lir !ImmOm IMPOIMMM Bergquist Engineering Services 27207 8th Avenue S P.O. Box 13309 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Des Moines, Washington 98198 Phone: 253.941.9399, Fax: 253.941.9499, e -mail: RBergqu510 @aol.com February 15, 2003 Mr. Christopher G. Slatt Starfire Sports PO Box 48299 Burien, Washington 98148 Re: Subsurface Exploration and Engineering Evaluation Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex South End of Fort Dent Park Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number: 200301, Report 1 Dear Mr. Slott: Bergquist Engineering Services is pleased to provide this report of the geotechnical exploration for the referenced project. The attached report summarizes project and site data, describes the services we performed, presents our findings, and provides recommendations regarding foundations, lateral earth pressures, and earthwork. The appendix of the report presents site maps, boring logs, and explanatory aids. Based on our exploration and engineering analysis; the proposed primary soccer building and appurtenant buildings attached to the south and west sides of the building should be supported on a deep foundation system consisting of augercast piles. Eighteen - inch diameter, augercast piles with tip elevations of about 50 feet below the existing site elevation should develop an estimated Toad carrying capacity of 50 tons. The actual load carrying capacity, however, should be determined by full -scale load tests conducted on the site. The small, lightly loaded building attached to the north side of the primary building may be supported on conventional spread- footings using an allowable bearing capacity of up to 1,000 psf. All footings should be founded in the native, undisturbed soils or properly compacted structural fill or backfill. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Starfire Sports • • BES Project Number: 200301, Report 1 Specific recommendations relative to design and construction of this project are presented in the attached report. The subsurface conditions and recommendations presented should be verified during construction. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of additional service, please contact us. � EXPIRES ?/ - Copies to: Addressee (5) Sincerely, Bergquist Engineering Services Richard A. Bergquist, PE Principal ii • TABLE OF CONTENTS • 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES 3 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION 3 4.1 Site Classification 3 4.2 Surface 4 4.3 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater 4 5. DISCUSSION 5 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 5 6.1 Seismic Considerations 5 6.2 Foundations 6 6.3 Slabs -On -Grade 8 6.4 Earthwork 9 6.4.1 Site Clearing 0 9 6.4.2 Excavation 10 6.4.3 Materials 10 6.4.4 Placement and Compaction 11 6.5 Drainage 11 6.6 Groundwater 12 6.7 Construction Observation and Testing 12 7. REPORT LIMITATIONS 13 APPENDIX Vicinity Map Al Site Plan A2 Boring Logs A3 Boring Log Notes Al 3 Unified Soil Classification System Al 6 Schematic of Footing Drain Al 7 Notes A18 • • GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND ENGINEERING EVALUATION PROPOSED FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLEX BUILDING SOUTH END OF FORT DENT PARK TUKWILA, WASHINGTON Prepared for: STARFIRE SPORTS By: BERGQUIST ENGINEERING SERVICES BES PROJECT NUMBER: 200301 - REPORT 1 FEBRUARY 15, 2003 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical exploration for the proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building to be constructed near the south end of Fort Dent Park in Tukwila, Washington. The location of the site is shown on the Vicinity Map on page Al in the Appendix of this report. Bergquist Engineering Services (BES) performed the geotechnical exploration to provide information or recommendations regarding: • seismic design considerations including liquefaction potential, • allowable bearing capacity and depth of suitable foundation systems with estimated settlements, • lateral earth pressures and friction coefficients, • influence of groundwater on the development, • site preparation, and • excavation slope considerations. Mr. Christopher G. Slott authorized our work on January 7, 2003 by signing and returning a copy of BES Proposal Number 24002, dated December 30, 2002. • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Mr. Jim Hanford of Carlson Architects and Mr. D. Allen Tucker of Engineers Northwest, Inc. provided design information presented herein. The project involves design and construction of a steel- framed complex to house indoor play fields (primary building), locker and training facilities (three story building on south side), management offices, and a food court (two story building on west side). The primary building, which encloses the play fields, will be about 210 feet long by 184 feet wide. Exterior walls will have a minimum height of about 36 feet and a maximum height at the gabled ends, of about 66 feet above ground surface. The surface of the playing fields will be at elevation 16 feet and will be constructed over a portland cement, concrete, slab -on- grade. It is assumed that live loads on the playing field slab will not exceed 50 pounds per square foot. A three -story building will be attached on the south side of the primary building. The lowest level of this building will be open at both the east and west ends. The lowest floor will be paved with portland cement concrete at or near an elevation of 16 feet. The middle floor, or main floor level, will be used for locker rooms, restrooms, and offices. The upper floor level will be reserved for future expansion. A two -story building will be attached on the west side of the primary building. The lowest floor of this building will be at about elevation 26.5 feet and will be used for an entrance lobby, offices, and a food court. The uppermost floor will be reserved for future expansion. A 60 -foot long by 40 -foot wide, single story building will be attached to the eastern portion of the north side of the primary building. The lowest finished floor of this building will be at about elevation 22 feet. Interior column loads will be on the order of 90 kips and exterior column loads will be on the order of 60 kips. If the actual foundation loads are greater than those stated herein, the geotechnical engineer must be notified to determine whether the recommendations presented herein require revision. The playing fields will be below the 100 -year flood level. Therefore, the primary building will be designed to permit flooding of the lowest level with minimal to no damage to the structure. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 2 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 The upper levels of the attached buildings will be designed with their finished levels above the 1 00-year flood. 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES The scope of services included a reconnaissance of the site by the geotechnical engineer, a review of geologic literature, drilling, logging, and sampling five test borings, installing a groundwater level monitoring well, laboratory testing, engineering analysis, and preparation of this report. During the drilling operation, soil samples were taken at the intervals noted on the individual boring logs, which are presented in the appendix on pages A3 and Al2. All borings, except for Boring Number 3, were backfilled upon completion with the excavated site -soils and bentonite in accordance with state of Washington regulations. A one -inch diameter, 55 -foot long, groundwater observation well was installed in Boring 3 according to state of Washington regulations. The soil samples were returned to our laboratory for analysis, which included visual classification and determination of the natural moisture content of all samples. The field and laboratory data were then evaluated by the geotechnical engineer relative to the proposed construction. The engineering recommendations and advice presented in this report have been made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical- engineering practices in the area. 4. SITE CHARACTERIZATION The information presented in this section was gathered by BES personnel for geotechnical engineering purposes only. This site characterization was not intended to address the presence or likelihood of contamination on or around the site. Specialized methods and procedures, which were not a part of this scope of services, are required for an adequate environmental site assessment. 4.1 Site Classification According to open file report 92 -7, Preliminary Liquefaction Susceptibi lity Map of the Renton Quadrangle, Washington by Stephen P. Palmer Geologic, the project site is in Category 1 soils, which have a high susceptibility to liquefaction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 3 of 13 Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 4.2 Surface At the time of our exploration, the surface of the site was covered with grass and weeds. In general, the ground - surface of the building site sloped gently down from the northeast corner to the southwest corner. 4.3 Subsurface Soil and Groundwater The subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at this site are described in the following paragraphs and are presented graphically on the boring Togs in the appendix of this report. The stratification lines, indicated on the boring logs, represent the approximate boundaries between soil types. Actual boundaries may be gradual and the transitions may not be easily discernible during site excavation. The area within the proposed building is covered with about six inches to one -foot of brown very loose to loose, SILT (ML) (topsoil). The topsoil contains fine roots and organic matter. In general, underlying the topsoil, very loose to loose, and medium dense brown to gray, fine SAND (SP) was encountered to a depth of about 18 feet. The "N- values" of this soil layer range from zero blows per foot to 17 blows per foot and average 6 blows per foot. From a depth of about 18 feet and extending to a depth of 65 feet below the surface, dark gray to black, medium dense fine to medium SAND (SP) was encountered. The "N- values" of these soils range from 9 to 35 blows per foot and average 23 blows per foot. Occasional lenses of fine to medium gravel were encountered within this stratum as well as occasional tree wood. Groundwater was encountered in all of the test borings. Groundwater readings, however, were not recorded because mud -rotary drilling methods introduce water and drilling mud into the boring, making it impossible to accurately determine groundwater levels. Accordingly, the groundwater was measured in the observation well that was installed in Boring 3. On January 27, 2003, the groundwater was measured at a depth of two feet below the ground surface by R. Bergquist. On February 6, 2003, the groundwater was measured at a depth of two and one -half feet below the ground surface by C. Slott. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 4 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 5. DISCUSSION The recommendations presented in this report are based on our understanding of the project as presented in the Project Description Section and on the assumption that the subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings adequately represent conditions near and between the exploratory test borings. Because project conditions regarding type and location of structures and foundation loads can change and because subsurface conditions are not always similar to those encountered in the borings, the geotechnical engineer must be contacted for review and possible revision of the recommendations if discrepancies are noticed. 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The following sections present recommendations regarding seismic considerations, foundations, lateral earth pressures, and for earthwork, excavations, drainage, and groundwater. 6.1 Seismic Considerations According to Figure No. 16 -2 of the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), the project site is in Seismic Zone 3. Based on the subsurface data gathered during our exploration, we estimate that the soils to a depth of 100 feet, have an average SPT "N- value" of 15 to 50 blows per foot and can best be described as a "Stiff Soil Profile." Therefore, according to Table 16 -J of the UBC, the site soil profile is best represented by a Soil Profile Type Sp. The near - surface soils are considered susceptible to liquefaction; however, the building will be supported on a deep foundation system that is founded in medium dense to dense SAND and the floor slab will be supported on two to three feet of structural fill. Therefore, the liquefaction potential of the near - surface soils should present minimal risk. Seismically induced settlement of the foundation soils may occur;. however, such settlement will probably be small and affect relatively large areas so that differential settlements over the relatively short foundation distances associated with this project will likely be within tolerable limits. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 5 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 6.2 Foundations Due to the vertical extent of the weak, compressible soils beneath the site, we recommend that the building loads be transmitted to the underlying, stronger, relatively incompressible SAND (SP), encountered at a depth of about 18 to 20 feet below the surface, by use of a deep foundation system. Deep foundation systems considered for this project included drilled piers, driven piles, and augercast piles. Drilled piers are best suited when weak or compressible, cohesive soils overlie strong, relatively incompressible, cohesive soils. Drilled piers can be designed to develop most of their Toad carrying capacity from end bearing. These soil conditions do not exist on this site, therefore, drilled piers are not recommended for use for support of the proposed building at this site. Driven piles are best suited when weak, compressible, cohesive, or non - cohesive soils overlie strong, incompressible, non - cohesive soils. Driven piles develop their load carrying capacity from a combination of friction along the side of the pile and from end bearing. Driven piles, such as steel pipe piles driven closed -end are suitable for use at this site. Because augercast piles are used so often in this area, it is likely that they will be more economical than driven piles. Therefore, recommendations for driven piles will be provided if requested. Augercast piles develop their load- carrying capacity from a combination of friction along the side of the pile and from end bearing. They are best suited to cohesionless soils that can be drilled with relatively low down force and torque. These conditions exist at this site, therefore, augercast piles are recommended for use at this site. Augercast piles may be used to support the proposed structure. The allowable Toad carrying capacity of 18 -inch diameter, augercast piles with tip elevations of 50 to 55 feet below existing grade, is estimated to be about 50 tons per pile. The actual Toad carrying capacity should be verified with at least two, full - scale, Toad tests prior to finalizing design or at least at the beginning of the project. Unless eccentric loads are compensated for by the use of additional structural elements, piles should be installed in groups of three or more for stability and should be spaced no closer than three -pile diameters center to center. The allowable load carrying capacity may be increased by one -third for wind or seismic loads. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 6 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 Lateral loads on the pile from wind and seismic loads will be resisted by the passive resistance of the soil surrounding the single pile or pile group. The upper 18 feet of soils, however, are weak and susceptible to liquefaction and should not be considered in determining the lateral capacity of the pile or pile group. An equivalent fluid pressure of 200 pcf for the passive resistance may be used for the submerged sands below a depth of 18 feet. The passive resistance will act over two pile diameters. Uplift forces will be resisted by the skin friction along the sides of the pile plus the mass of the pile and pile cap. Uplift resistance due to skin friction is estimated to be 25 tons per pile for a 50 -foot long, 18 -inch diameter pile with at least 30 feet of embedment into the underlying medium dense SAND. An experienced contractor using continuous- flight, hollow -stem augers, should install augercast piles. Concrete grout must be continuously pumped through the auger maintaining a minimum grout head of five feet above the auger tip while the auger is extracted. To minimize the effects of soil disturbance at the bottom of the hole and thus enhance end - bearing capacity of the pile, the auger should be rotated while pumping a few cubic feet of grout through the tip before auger extraction is begun. Once the auger is extracted, the reinforcing steel should be placed. If the design does not require full - length reinforcing steel, a single reinforcing bar with an end - centering device, should be inserted the full length into each pile to confirm continuity of grout over the entire length of the pile. The reinforcing steel must be inserted by its own weight. The use of mechanical force while inserting the steel must not be permitted. If the reinforcing steel cannot be inserted without force, the pile must be re- drilled and re- grouted until the steel can be inserted without force. The small, lightly loaded, single story building attached to the eastern portion of the north side of the primary building may be supported on conventional spread footing foundations. Conventional wall and individual column footings may be dimensioned using a net allowable bearing capacity of up to 1,000 psf if they are placed in organic -free, undisturbed, gray, loose to medium stiff SILT (ML) encountered below elevation 22 feet. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 7 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 The recommended minimum dimension for continuous wall footings is 18 inches and for individual column footings, the recommended minimum dimension is 24 inches. All perimeter footings should be placed at least 18 inches below finished grade for frost protection. The allowable bearing capacities may be increased by one -third for wind and seismic Toads. If the recommendations in this report are followed, total settlement of the foundation will be less than one inch (1 -inch) with differential settlements of less than three - quarters of an inch (3/4- inch.) Lateral earth pressures for design of spread - footing foundations or short retaining walls with level backfill and without hydrostatic pressures or surcharge loads, may be calculated using the equivalent fluid pressures presented below: Active: Undisturbed subsoils • 40 psf /ft. Compacted granular soils 35 psf /ft. Passive: Continuous footings 250 psf /ft. Column footings 300 psf /ft. A coefficient of friction between footings and bearing soils of 0.30 may be used to resist lateral foundation Toads. If passive earth pressures are used in conjunction with base friction to resist lateral Toads, reduce the coefficient of friction to 0.25. Footings, stem walls, and retaining walls should be reinforced to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movements. A qualified engineer should determine the size, quantity, and location of reinforcement. All footing excavations at this site should be inspected by the geotechnical engineer prior to placement of construction forms and reinforcement steel. 6.3 Slabs -on -Grade Slabs -on -grade below the flood level (e.g. the playing field) will be placed on two to nearly three feet of fill. The fill should be clean, free - draining, crushed rock or crushed gravel meeting the gradation presented in Table 6.1 and compacted according to the recommendations provided in Section 6.4.4 of this report. After stripping of the topsoil, a robust, non - woven, filter fabric (MIRAFI® 1 100N or similar and approved by the geotechnical engineer) should be placed over the entire area according to manufacturers specifications. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 8 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 The filter fabric will act as a reinforcing layer over the weak, near - surface soils and as a separator between the fine - grained soils and the structural fill. The structural fill should then be placed on the fabric in such a way so as not cause traffic on the fabric. If the fabric is damaged or torn, it should be replaced or repaired according to manufacturer's recommendations. Plastic sheeting should not be used beneath the concrete slabs -on -grade below flood elevation in order to permit vertical drainage of the structural fill. Slabs -on -grade above the flood level (e.g. the small, lightly loaded building .on the north side of the primary building) should be supported on a minimum of four inches of compacted granular material that meets gradation and compaction recommendations provided in Sections 6.4.3 and 6.4.4 of this report. Dowels should be evaluated for use at control joints where Toad transfer capability is required and to minimize abrupt changes in elevation should differential settlements occur. A 6 -mil minimum thickness, plastic sheet, vapor barrier should be included beneath all interior slabs -on- grade. A four -inch thick layer of clean sand may be placed over the plastic sheet to protect it from damage during placement of the concrete. All concrete, especially slabs -on- grade, should be placed at minimum water- cement ratios on moistened surfaces and properly cured to minimize shrinkage, cracking, warping, and curling. Concrete slabs should be allowed to cure adequately before placing vinyl or other moisture sensitive surface treatments. Lightly loaded, interior partition walls may be supported on thickened floor slab sections provided that: (1) Toads do not exceed 750 pounds per lineal foot, (2) thickened sections are at least 12 inches wide, and (3) section thickness and reinforcement are consistent with structural requirements. 6.4 Earthwork The recommendations presented in this report are predicated on fulfillment of the following earthwork recommendations. 6.4.1 Site Clearing: The existing vegetation, topsoil, pavement remnants, underground utility lines, and any other deleterious materials should be removed from the project area prior to construction. After site clearing and stripping, the exposed surfaces should be graded relatively flat to allow for proper subgrade preparation but sloped slightly to allow good surface drainage during construction. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 9 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 6.4.2 Excavation: According to Chapter 296 -155, Part N of the Safety Standards for Construction Work in the State of Washington, the site soils classify as Type C soils. Therefore, side slopes of excavations deeper than four (4) feet should be no steeper than one and one -half (11/2) horizontal to one (1) vertical (1' /2H:1V). If the dimensions of the site prevent the use of maximum slopes of 1'/2H:1 V, the slopes must be stabilized or shored to facilitate safe excavations. The geotechnical engineer should be contacted for additional recommendations if such techniques are going to be employed. Excavations below approximate elevation 12 feet will probably require temporary dewatering of the site. Sumps with sump pumps may be sufficient in shallow excavations where SILT soils are encountered. Well points may be required to dewater areas where SAND soils are encountered. The piling contractor should be made aware of the possibility that obstructions such as tree limbs or entire tree trunks may be encountered within the underlying alluvial soils. Generally, if obstructions are encountered at very shallow depths they are removed by excavation. Pile are generally relocated at the direction of the structural engineer, if obstructions are encountered at greater depth. 6.4.3 Materials: The on -site fine SAND or SILT soils are generally not suitable for use as structural fill or structural backfill on this site. These soils are moisture sensitive and difficult to compact, therefore, well - graded, free - draining soils free of organics, and oversized particles should be imported for structural fill and structural backfill. Structural fill or backfill soil should conform to the gradation presented in Table 6.1, and be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. A sample of the proposed structural fill soil must be delivered to the geotechnical engineer at least 72 hours before the contractor intends to use it. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 10 of 13 Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building Tukwila, Washington February 15, 2003 BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 TABLE 6.1 GRADATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FILL AND BACKFILL R ll � l C ; t � ti �N i .,! * q+Ny,N � 'U 5 Standard Sieve r s .C;. 4..- t Percent.;Pa ung -s,.. 3 -inch 100 3/4 -inch 50 -100 No. 4 25 -65 No. 10 10 -50 No. 40 0 -20 No. 200 0 -5* *Note: The percent passing the No. 200 sieve is based on the weight of the material passing the 3/4 -inch sieve. 6.4.4 Placement and Compaction: All structural fill and structural backfill materials should be placed in relatively horizontal loose lifts not exceeding 10 inches in thickness and compacted to at least 95 percent of the modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) maximum density at moisture contents within two (2) percent of optimum. The specified compacted density and moisture content of each lift must be verified by test, prior to placement of subsequent lifts. 6.5 Drainage Good drainage is considered critical to the performance of earth - supported structures such as foundations, slabs -on- grade, and pavements. Therefore, construction grades and final site grades should be designed to prevent water from ponding in areas on or adjacent to foundations, slabs -on- grade, pavements, and retaining walls. Infiltration of water into foundation and utility excavations should be prevented during construction and throughout the life of the project. For buildings supported on conventional spread footings, a perimeter drain - system consisting of perforated, rigid, PVC pipe surrounded by washed gravel is recommended. The washed gravel should be separated from the surrounding soil by a nonwoven filter fabric similar to MIRAFI® 140N. The collected water should be tight -lined away from the building to a suitable discharge system. Roof and surface drains should be provided but they should not be connected to the perimeter -drain system. A sketch of a footing drain system is presented in the Appendix of this report. Bergquist Engineering Services Page 11 of 13 • • Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Building February 15, 2003 Tukwila, Washington BES Project Number 200301 -Report 1 During construction, adequate erosion control measures should be installed and maintained Ito prevent migration of soil from the site. These measures may include the installation of silt fences and /or hay bales at appropriate locations to collect sediments. The erosion control methods as required by the appropriate Uniform Building Code. Typically, this includes inspection of placement of reinforcing steel; inspection and ' Ber uist Engineering Services Page 12 of 13 99 9 9 9 Bergquist Engineering Services Page 13 of 13 APPENDIX PARK s • 15 BUCK RIVER RIPARIAN FORES 22 a T 158TH avts_ ,PARK •s1 NTON TION RENT'' 25 *TI MM v) sit 3381 'oTH SOlu RENTON urr, .IOC VICINITY MAP Project Name: Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington Date: February 15, 2003 Bergquist Engineering Services For: Starfire Sports BES Project Number: 200301 -1 Al • SITE PLAN Project Name: Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington Date: February 15, 2003 Bergquist Engineering Services For: Starfire Sports BES Project Number: 200301-1 A2 Bilyquist Engineering Services. Log of Boring 1 Project: Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200301, Report 1 Date Drilled: January 13, 2003 Drilling Rig: Track - mounted CME 850 Boring Size: 6" /Mud Rotary. Automatic Hammer Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation 25' 'r De�t�i. ( #eet ; Simple' c ; Number . and°Type N Valui t (stows/ <« Foot, Moisture` ? . ti Qiitent (%) s {� r `cr `ter Descnpbon and [7SC:S2 i > t .,t � f n£z < l Clossificatiors; 4 : . , r : -:. v:s , ; ..44,- ..r. ' . .. `. _ 1 SS 9 24.6 Pork b r. 5g y-SAT. (ML1 lLo.F;!eib - - Brown, loose, SILT (ML) - 5 5 _ - 2SS 7 33.1 - Gray, loose SILT (ML) - _10_ _10_ 3SS 9 42.3 15 _15 _ 455 6 30.4 Gray, loose, fine SAND (SP) _ _20_ 20 _ 555 8 35.5 Gray, loose SILT (ML) _25_ _ 655 11 33.9 _25_ _30_ 755 21 26.7 _30_ Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) _3_ 35 855 26 24.1 - - — _ _ _ _ = — — — — — _40 Continued on Next Page _40_ A3 B,quist Engineering Services. Log of Boring 1 Continued ti r Depth (feet }' ,Sample r Nbmber r , '.: :and ,T,ype.. N- Value> s "f (Blowsf y: f toot}:, s P , �llo1 sture t Content (J6�. ?,.,... y, ` * r T. :, Descnpttd�n ana scs,� h�;, Y ` f i _ Closstfrtaflon . ,t. _40_ 40 — 955 24 22.8 — _45_ 1055 31 14.5 _45_ _50_ — 11 SS 30 21.4 _50_ — Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) _ _55_ _ 12SS 25 28.6 _55 — _60_ 13SS 23 29.3 _60_ _65_ 14SS 27 30.2 _65_ 70 15SS '23 32.5 _70_ _75 — 75 Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) — — 16SS _ 17 32.8 _ END OF BORING _80_ 80 A4 BEiquist Engineering Services. Log of Boring 2 Project: Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200301, Report 1 Date Drilled: January 13, 2003 Drilling Rig: Track- mounted CME 850 Boring: 6" /Mud Rotary. Automatic Hammer. Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 14' Depih, (feet); Sampler Number . > and TYPe , �N Value r t (Brows/ �^, ' , 4 • ?` 1 ootl Moisfure {(Q//a.. Content Descnphon.and USCS h x Classtficahon .. :_. . _ >.._ - pork t um, -5sady Sllr (MLCjTo�eif - - Brown, very loose SILT (ML) - - _ 1SS WR 51.5 Q9 lzroyZ Vpi1L194te_ TILT INIflo_mil _5_ 255 2 34.8 _5_ - WR 43.0 - 3SS _10 4S5 2 37.3 _10_ - Brown, very loose to loose, fine SAND (SP) - _15_ _ 55S 5 34.4 _15_ _20_ 6SS 14 23.2 _20_ - Dark gray, medium dense, course SAND (SP) - _25_ - 75S 14 43.0 _25_ occasional woody debris (1' diomeferj - _30_ 30 855 26 14.5 Dario gray, medium dense, coarse SAND (SP), with medium - - - gravel - _35_ 9SS 26 22.7 _35_ _ Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) _ Continued on Next Page _40 _40_ A5 Biliquist Engineering Services. Log of Boring 2 Continued Deptk (feet); a : Sample • Number . . and Type; N Y' ne �' , , , �Y , (Bows/ Foot) ; :-.1:4', Moisture : r Content (96). i r Z , Descnpfiop and'USCS,' ; r C(asstficotion ``:... - Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) - _40_ - l OSS 25 17.9 _40 trace glove' _ _45_ _ 11SS 21 25.4 _45_ Dark gray, dense, fine to medium SAND (SP) - _50_ _ 12SS 19 -- _50_ trace woody debris of 46' - - Dark gray, medium dense, fine to medium SAND (SP) - _55_ 1355 28 28.3 _55_ _60_ _ 14SS 23 33.2 _60_ Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) 65 65 1555 25 28.9 Dark gray medium dense, fine to medium SAND (SP) - _ END OF BORING _70_ 70 _75_ 75 _ 80_ _8Q A6 Beequist Engineering Services. Log of Boring 3 Project: Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200301, Report 1 Date Drilled: January 13, 2003 Drilling Rig: Track - mounted CME 850 Boring Size: 6” /Mud Rotary. Automatic Hammer. Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 14' t , e :,.. {fP,e ..i ',.Y: a.. Sample ' Number' and.Type� FV `Value.,, P � r Blows] j� J 3 49 �:: ,Foot } % „� ;r: `'' oisfure < n'� n ^S 'I (p/�/] 4Content {_ _� «.r.�r . _ r..i rf,:,� " i =4 t , >>,u,. { ;e' . • _ �, Descnphon, unc USC$ xn 4 y a , '"' i , + r 7- :1 �f' i n k d ■C s J c .f�`f �, p'pg 5`i r T\ Y 7 1 { �f yIQ.ssAcQ ,:Y '. ' ::. a.:. ; =� >> . - r_,,;. ,S1 , a.t _ Dark brown,Sandy SILT jML).Toesoilj - - 5 24.3 Jan. 27, 2003 Brown, loose, SILT (ML) Feb. 06, 2003 - r_ 1SS 5 5 2SS 6 44.7 - = 4 30.8 Gray, loose SILT (ML) - - 3SS _10_ _10_ _ 4SS 7 33.8 - 15 9 29.2 _15_ 5SS _ Gray, loose, fine SAND (SP) _ 20 6SS 22 20.9 _20_ _ Gray, loose SILT (ML) _25_ 7SS 22 21.9 _25_ _30_ 15 40.2 30 8SS - Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) - _35_ 9SS 26 13.1 35 r ...ter = = = _40_ Continued on Next Page _40_ A7 Bogiquist Engineering Service* Log of Boring 3 Continued ;L' ' : ,.. 01:01n.- : , N.ii ; ,...- . S471010:''. ,.:', :' Number :, • ...;.1P..1.. 1'1 icIACI'til'i.. ' : NTYatuk:' ', : . jai, ....., i:,.. ''. '..-"7!fs.1:-,-,, ' :. Foot) :' . ,,:. ‘g:jj'aikk. ,-....1S1p1.7,-..,: . ;(,..iiiifOiii3Ot.,,i :::',.' ,,. ,:- . . !:.- '::::- :e1;•,..,... '. ',-: Cri.'.4. 86% iiii ,- ,:. '. -,,,1 -2,,..:-..,,' l':. , :. : -, .... ,7 v.,/ ., ;..., . '.- ',,'":-:': ' .....:,,- ,, :._-,:, , , .:., f+s.g.i .q..#1,0.:...,,.:. .,;•.,' --i'.':- ..,,„ -' , : :.,...,---.:.,,,,..::.,.., _ - _ 40 _ _ - _ - 45 _ _ _ - _50_ 50 _ - - 5 - 5 _ - - 60 - - - _ 65 21 25 27 30 28 17 17.8 25.9 31.8 28.5 32.1 37.2 Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) . Dark gray, medium dense, fine to medium SAND (SP) . Dark gray, fine SAND (SP) - 40 - - _ _ - _ 45 _ _ - -- -- _ 5 _ 0 _ - _ 55 _ __ - - - — - 60 - _ - 65 loss 11SS 12SS 13SS 1455 1555 _ _70_ - _75_ - 80 - - END OF BORING - _70_ _ _ 75 - _ _ 80 A8 Birquist Engineering Service* Log of Boring 4 Project: Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200301, Report 1 Date Drilled: January 9, 2003 Drilling Rig: Track - mounted CME 850 Boring Size: 611/Mud Rotary. Automatic Hammer. Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation: 14' Dept . y (feetj; . Sample: , Number" :.and Type' N -Value , t ` 01914V:- Foots Moisture : Content (7o) ` r 4 Desrnption and USCS Classification -" _ -.c.,, . : ;.. ; . . _ Pork inoYal. 32114-SJ4T (Mil ToP22ill - - 155 5 30.5 - _5_ 5 _ 255 6 31.3 _ - 7 32.9 - 3S5 _ Brown, very loose to loose, fine SAND (SP) _ _ _ 4SS 10 33.3 _10_ _15_ 3 28.5 15 5SS - Dark brown, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) _20_ 6SS 11 26.4 20 -25_ 27 23.9 7SS _30_ 28 24.1 _25_ 30 8SS - Dark gray to block, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) _ - (fine to medium grave/ of 34 feet) _ _35- 95S 30 14.3 35 = — — _ _ _ _ — _40_ = — — Continued on Next Page _40_ A9 Bliquist Engineering Services* Log of Boring 4 Continued Depth eet) Sample Number and Type. N Value w " (Blows/, a ,. Footj ,.. Moisture Content (96) , r Descnption and.USCS Clossificahon ; - Dark gray, dense, medium SAND (SP) - _40_ 1055 22 25.3 40 _45_ 21 28.8 45 11SS - Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) _ _50_ 12SS 35 29.7 50 _55_ 25 28.2 Dark gray, dense, medium SAND (SP) 55 135S _60_ 24 36.8 14SS - _60_ Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) - 65 15SS 22 31.5 65 _ END OF BORING _ _70_ 70 _75_ _75_ _80_ 80 A10 Biliquist Engineering Service. Log of Boring 5 Project: Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington BES Project No.: 200301, Report 1 Date Drilled: January 9, 2003 Drilling Rig: Track - mounted CME 850 Boring Size: 6" /Mud Rotary. Automatic Hammer. Drilled By: Gregory Drilling, Inc. Logged By: R. A. Bergquist, PE Approximate Ground Surface Elevation 15' ' Depth (feet] Sample Number, and Type N- Value (Blows/ oot). r.. Moisture' - Content (%) .Descnpfion and USC5', F . Classification Y , _ park 'nom , ndr_SAT (ML} (Topnii) _ - Brown, loose, SILT (ML) _ - 1SS 5 32.5 Brown, loose, fine SAND (SP) - _5_ - 2SS 5 46.9 _5_ Brown, slightly mottled reddish brown, loose, fine SAND (SP) _ - 8 33.7 - 3SS - Gray, loose, fine SAND (SP) - 10 _ _ • 10- 4SS 17 22.4 - - - _15_ 10 27.1 15 5SS - Dark gray, medium dense, medium to coarse SAND (SP) - _20_ 6SS 12 23.2 20 - Dark gray, loose, medium to coarse SAND (SP) - - - 7SS 9 29.8 - _25_ Dark gray, medium dense, medium coarse SAND (SP) - _30_ 8SS 28 21.7 30 _35_ 25 11.3 9SS _ _35_ Dark gray, medium dense, fine to medium gravel (GP) - _40_ Continued on Next Page _40_ All Bipquist Engineering Service. Log of Boring 5 Continued Deptfi3 ( t) P Sample, µNumber. and Type' N -Value ,r (Blows /, t, r foot) .. °Mpisture Content (%) , 4 Description and USCS, - �r Classification - Dark gray, dense, medium SAND (SP) - 40 IOSS 31 21.2 40 45 24 15.1 45 11SS _ Dark gray, medium dense, medium SAND (SP) _ 50 12SS 21 . 22.2 50 _55_ 34 31.2 Dark gray, dense, medium SAND (SP) _55_ 13SS _60_ 29 25.9 _60_ 14SS - Dark gray, medium dense, fine SAND (SP) - 65 15SS 17 34.5 65 _ END OF BORING _ 70 70 _75_ _75_ 80 80 Al 2 • • BORING LOG NOTES These notes and boring logs are intended for use with this geotechnical report for the purposes and project described therein. The boring logs depict BES's interpretation of subsurface conditions at the location of the boring on the date noted. Subsurface conditions may vary, and groundwater levels may change because of seasonal or numerous other factors. Accordingly, the boring logs should not be made a part of construction plans or be used to define construction conditions. The approximate locations of the borings are shown on the Site Plan. The borings were located in the field by Steve Beck and Richard Bergquist by estimating distances from existing site features. "Boring Size/Type" refers the diameter and type of auger used. "HSA" denotes hollow -stem auger. "SSA" denotes solid -stem auger. "BA" denotes bucket auger. "Sample Type" refers to the sampling method and equipment used during exploration where: • "AU" indicates a bulk sample taken from the ground surface or from the auger flights. • "SS" indicates split -spoon sampler with 1 -3/8" inside diameter and 2" outside diameter. • "DM" indicates Dames and Moore split -spoon sampler with 2 -1/2" inside diameter and 3 -1/3" outside diameter. "N -Value (Blows /Foot)" refers to the number of blows from a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches required to advance a standard sampler one -foot or a specified distance. Refusal is 50 blows for less than six inches or 25 blows without advancing the sampler. • "WR" indicates tht the sampler was advanced 18 inches by the weight of the rods without any blows of the hammer. "Moisture Content" refers to the moisture content of the soil expressed in percent by weight as determined in the laboratory. "Description and Classification" refer to the materials encountered in the boring. The descriptions and classifications are generally based on visual examination in the field and laboratory. Where noted, laboratory tests were performed to determine the soil classification. The terms and symbols used in the boring logs are in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Laboratory tests are performed in general accordance with applicable procedures described by the American Society for Testing and Materials. A13 BORING LOG NOTES continued I I Solid PVC Pipe Slotted PVC Pipe Bentonite Chips Sand Term Standard Penetration Resistance "N" Very Loose 4 or less Loose 5 to 10 Medium Dense 11 to 30 Dense 31 to 50 Very Dense Over 50 blows /foot TERMS for RELATIVE CONSISTENCY of COHESIVE SOIL Term Unconfined Compressive Strength Very Soft 0 to 0.25 tons /square -foot (tsf) Soft 0.25 to 0.50 tsf Medium Stiff 0.50 to 1.00 tsf Stiff 1.00 to 2.00 tsf Very Stiff 2.00 to 4.00 tsf Hard Over 4.00 tsf Al 4 • • BORING LOG NOTES continued DEFINITION of MATERIAL by DIAMETER of PARTICLE Boulder 8- inches+ Cobble 3 to 8 inches Gravel 3 inches to 5mm Coarse Sand 5mm to 0.6mm Medium Sand 0.6mm to 0.2mm Fine Sand 0.2mm to 0.074mm Silt 0.074mm to 0.005mm Clay less than 0.005mm UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) COARSE GRAINED SOILS (Less than 50% fines. Fines are soils passing the # 200 sieve.) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS GW Well -graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve. GP Poorly graded GRAVELS or GRAVEL -SAND mixtures, less than 5% fines. GM Silty GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% fines. GC Clayey GRAVELS, GRAVEL- SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% fines. SW Well -graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve. SP Poorly graded SANDS or Gravelly SANDS mixtures, less than 5% fines. SM Silty SANDS, SAND -SILT mixtures, more than 12% fines. SC Clayey SANDS, SAND -CLAY mixtures, more than 12% fines Note: Coarse - grained soils receive dual symbols if they contain between 5 and 12 percent fines. FINE- GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% fines. Fines are materials passing the # 200 sieve) GROUP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAJOR DIVISIONS ML Inorganic SILTS, very fine SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, Silty or Clayey SANDS SILTS and CLAYS Liquid limit less than 50 • CL Inorganic CLAYS of low to medium plasticity, Gravelly CLAYS, Sandy CLAYS, Silty CLAYS, Lean CLAYS OL Organic SILTS, or organic Silty CLAYS of low plasticity MH Inorganic SILTS, Micoceous or Diatomaceous fine SANDS or SILTS, Elastic SILTS SILTS and CLAYS Liquid limit greater than 50 CH Inorganic CLAYS of high plasticity, fat CLAYS OH Organic CLAYS of medium to high plasticity PT PEAT, MUCK, and other highly organic soils Highly organic soils Note: Fine - grained soils receive dual symbols if their limits plot left of the "A" Line and have a plasticity index (PI) of 4 to 7 percent. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Bergquist Engineering Services Al 6 Exterior Grade. Sloped Away from Building Interior Floor Tightline Roof Drain Nonwoven, Needle Punched or Spunbound, Filter Fabric (MIRAFI 140N or Equal) Minimum 6" thick wrap of washed gravel Rigid, 4" Diameter, Perforated PVC Pipe (Perforations Facing Down) Footing t SCHEMATIC OF FOOTING DRAIN Project Name: Proposed Fort Dent Soccer Complex Location: Tukwila, Washington Date: February 15, 2003 Bergquist Engineering Services For: Starfire Sports BES Project Number: 200301 -1 A17 • I NOTES A18 FIRST AMENDMENT AGREEMENT NUMBER 03 -058 4 U3 -G ��g��J O pprovQd b-j CTJCdv'c,L This First Amendment to Agreement ( "First Amendment") amends that certain Agreement entered into effective the 1st day of March, 2003, by and between the City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation ( "City"), and Starfire Sports, a Washington nonprofit corporation ( "Starfire "), recorded under King County Recording Number 20030317001798 ( "Agreement "). The City and Starfire have determined that it is in their mutual interest to amend Sections 1.9, 4.8 and 5.3 of the Agreement. Accordingly, the City and Starfire agree as follows: 1. Amendment to Section 1.9. Section 1.9 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as f The CITY will provide the parking shown in Exhibit B to support the PREMISES and its operation However, if any additional parking is required to support the PREMISES and its operation, the CITY and STARFIRE agree to work together to solicit federal, state, or county funding to provision the additional parking. Tukwila residents with proof of residency by state issued identification will not be charged a fee to park during events at Starfire. 2. Amendment to Section 4.8. Section 4.8 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: Starfire may sublease the softball fields to a not - for - profit organization to enhance and operate the Facilities' softball fields and make these fields available to City-based leagues and tournaments, as well as regional and national tournaments; in addition, Starfire may convert the softball fields into soccer fields and make these fields available to the youth and adults on teams from the City and surrounding areas or sublease the fields to a professional soccer club or organization. 3. Amendment to Section 5.3. Section 5.3.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: The CITY will be responsible to provide parking shown on exhibit `B" to support the PREMISES and its operations. 4. Indemnification. Starfire agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, staff, officers, agents, and employees from any claims or actions, suits, loss, costs, expenses and damages of any nature whatsoever, including costs and attorneys fees in defense and costs on appeal thereof that arise out of the terms of the bargain and sale deed between King County and the City of Tukwila found at Exhibit D to this agreement that are related to major league soccer use of the facility. 5. No Other Modifications. Except as specifically modified by this First Amendment, the Agreement is unaltered and remains in full force and effect. Dated this /,� day of March, 2008. i)k)follows: STARFIRE SPORTS A not -for - ! ofit W By: AP n corporation Christopher G. Slatt, Chairman and President D • S TO ORM: City Attorney ORIGINAL AGREEMENT RECORDING. NUMBER: 20030317001798 CITY OF TUKWILA A Washington municipal corporation By: ST: Hag :r: , Mayor City��Clerk [Forms of Notary] 11111111 111111111111111 20030317001798 TUKWILA OF 048AG 66.00 03/17/2003 12:48 KING COUNTY, WA CITY OF TUKWILA DOCUMENT RECORDING COVER SHEET Return Address: CITY OF TUKWILA Bob Baker, CMC, Deputy City Clerk Office of the City Clerk 6200 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 (206) 433 -1800 i Q Document Title(s): AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TUKWILA AND STARFIRE SPORTS (Including Exhibits A — D) Parties: City of Tukwila Other: Starfire Sports A Not - For - Profit Washington Corporation (Christopher G. Slats, Chairman & President) Legal Description: SW 1/4, Sec. 13, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Govt. Lots 1 & 2, Sec. 23, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Govt. Lots 1 & 5, Sec. 24, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Tract 36, Second Supplement Map of Renton Shore Lands Blocks 4 -9 & 12 -17, Gundaker's Interurban Addn. Assessor's Tax Parcel ID #'s: 1323049080, 2323049001, 2423049030 & 2954900426 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TUKWILA AND STARFIRE SPORTS - � - MILS -� - oh t /off o'`--r' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE 1. RECITALS AND FINDINGS 1 1.1 PARK 1 1.2 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT 1 1.3 PRIVATE OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT 1 1.4 STARFIRE 1 1.5 FACILITIES 1 1.6 NO PARTNERSHIP 2 1.7 PREMISES 2 1.8 CITY POLICE POWER 2 1.9 PARKING 2 1.10 FINANCING 2 1.11 CONTINUED PARK AND RECREATION USE 3 ARTICLE 2. GROUND AND USE GRANT 3 2.1 PREMISES 3 2.2 POSSESSION, QUIET ENJOYMENT & COVENANTS 3 ARTICLE 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT 3 3.1 TERM 3 3.2 OPTION TO RENEW 4 ARTICLE 4. STARFIRE OBLIGATIONS 4 4.1 AGREEMENT 4 4.2 NOT - FOR - PROFIT 4 4.3 INVESTMENT 4 4.4 ATHLETIC CENTER BUILDING 4 4.5 FIELDS - TURF 4 4.6 FIELDS - GRASS 4 4.7 STADIUM 5 4.8 SOFTBALL FIELDS 5 4.9 EDUCATION- SCHOLARSHIPS 5 4.10 CITY 4T" OF JULY CELEBRATION 5 4.11 STARFIRE LIAISON 5 4.12 FACILITIES AND PREMISES 5 4.13 ENTRY BY CITY 6 4.14 HEALTH INSPECTIONS 6 4.15 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, & IMPROVEMENTS 7 4.16 SIGNS 8 4.17 UTILITIES 8 4.18 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 9 4.19 RISK OF Loss 9 ARTICLE 5. CITY OBLIGATIONS 10 5.1 AGREEMENT 10 5.2 PICNIC - PLAY AREAS - STORM WATER 10 5.3 STREETS - PARKING 10 5.4 LEVEE - TRAILS 10 5.5 NAMING RIGHTS - SIGNS - ZONING 10 5.6 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS 11 5.7 LIQUOR LICENSE 11 5.8 PUBLIC SAFETY 11 AGREEMENT i 50367676.02 5.9 PERMITTING 11 5.10 CITY LIAISON 11 5.11 PROMOTION 11 5.12 FEES AND CHARGES 11 ARTICLE 6. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF PREMISES 11 6.1 DESIGN 11 6.2 BUILDING & SITE PLANS /ACCESS EASEMENT 12 6.3 CONSTRUCTION /SITE WORK/FENCING 12 6.4 CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES 12 6.5 FAILURE TO MEET CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES /TIME OF ESSENCE 13 6.6 STORM WATER DRAINAGE, SEWER, & WATER LINES 13 6.7 DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION FEES & EXPENSES 13 6.8 NOT A PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 13 6.9 No LIENS 14 6.10 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION 14 ARTICLE 7. FINANCING & SECURITY INTERESTS 16 7.1 FINANCING - NO CITY OBLIGATION 16 7.2 MORTGAGES - GENERALLY 16 7.3 SECURITY INTEREST IN PREMISES & AGREEMENT /CONSENT 16 7.4 LENDER'S RELIANCE ON TERM 17 7.5 SURRENDER OF THE COLLATERAL 17 7.6 NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND LENDER'S RIGHTS 17 7.7 RIGHT TO ASSIGN 18 7.8 DISPOSITION OF INSURANCE 18 7.9 RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN LITIGATION 19 7.10 INCORPORATION OF LENDER'S PROTECTION PROVISIONS 19 7.11 RIGHT TO REMOVE COLLATERAL 19 7.12 NOTICES 19 ARTICLE 8. TERMINATION 20 8.1 FAILURE TO PERFORM 20 8.2 DEFAULT 20 8.3 REMEDIES ARE CUMULATIVE 21 8.4 DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES & USE OF INSURANCE PROCEEDS 21 8.5 DUTIES UPON TERMINATION 22 8.6 EMINENT DOMAIN 22 ARTICLE 9. GENERAL CONDITIONS 23 9.1 RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES 23 9.2 NOTICES 23 9.3 REPORTS & INFORMATION 24 9.4 PERMITS, LICENSES, TAXES, & FEES 24 9.5 INSURANCE 25 9.6 HOLD HARMLESS, INDEMNIFICATION, & INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE 26 9.7 SUCCESSORS & ASSIGNS 26 9.8 BANKRUPTCY 27 9.9 COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS 27 9.10 NONDISCRIMINATION 27 9.11 CHOICE OF LAW & VENUE 28 9.12 COSTS & ATTORNEYS' FEES 28 9.13 MODIFICATION 28 9.14 CHANGE IN LAW/RENEGOTIATION 28 9.15 FORCE MAJEURE 28 9.16 WAIVER 29 AGREEMENT 11 50367676.02 9.17 ILLEGAL PROVISIONS - SEVERABILITY 29 9.18 ARTICLE HEADINGS, GENDER, & NUMBER 29 9.19 ENTIRE AGREEMENT 29 9.20 COUNTERPARTS 29 9.21 RECORDING 29 Exhibit A — Description of PREMISES Exhibit B — Preliminary Building and Site Plans Exhibit C — Starfire Sports FACILITIES Exhibit D — Legal Description of PARK AGREEMENT 50367676.02 iii G- --o,5-& AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into effective the 1st day of March, 2003 (the "EFFECTIVE DATE "), by and between the CITY OF TUKWILA, a Washington municipal corporation ( "CITY "), and STARFIRE SPORTS, a Washington non - profit corporation ( "STARFIRE "). The CITY and STARFIRE are referred to collectively as the "PARTIES." In consideration of the promises, covenants, and provisions set forth in this Agreement, the PARTIES agree as follows: Article 1. RECITALS AND FINDINGS 1.1 Park. The CITY is owner of the property commonly described as Fort Dent Regional Park (the "PARK ") legally described in Exhibit D. 1.2 Intergovernmental Agreement. The CITY acquired the PARK through an INTERGOVERNMENTAL LAND TRANSFER AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF TUKWILA (January 3, 2003; the, "INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT "), in part as a result of King County's lack of sufficient, stable revenues to manage and maintain its parks, open space and recreational facilities. 1.3 Private Operation and Development. At the time the CITY acquired the PARK from King County, the CITY intended to provide for private operation, maintenance and further development of a portion of the PARK, consistent with the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT. 1.4 STARFIRE. STARFIRE has the experience, ability, and resources to develop and operate park athletic, recreation and associated facilities ( "FACILITIES ") at the PARK. STARFIRE intends to develop a regional facility for soccer, softball and other athletic and recreational uses, and to provide scholarships, grants and aid to underprivileged people throughout King County. 1.5 Facilities. The PARTIES intend this Agreement to be a ground and use concession and licenses granting STARFIRE the exclusive rights to develop, construct, and operate FACILITIES, as described more fully in attached Exhibit C. STARFIRE may operate AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 1 of 31 concessions and impose fees and charges within these areas of the PARK, described herein, and which said PARK areas will remain property of the CITY. 1.6 No Partnership. The PARTIES agree that no joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. 1.7 Premises. STARFIRE will be responsible for the design and construction of the FACILITIES and exterior landscaping (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "PREMISES ") blending with the PARK setting. All improvements to the PREMISES will become property of the CITY at the termination of this Agreement. 1.8 City Police Power. By entering this Agreement, the CITY does not waive any of its police power authority and shall retain final permits for the PREMISES. 1.9 Parking. The CITY, and not STARFIRE, will be responsible to provide adequate parking to support the PREMISES and its operations. 1.10 Financing. 1.10.1 STARFIRE will be responsible for obtaining all necessary financing for the development and operation of the PREMISES. 1.10.2 It is mutually understood by the PARTIES that any lender who provides financing to STARFIRE solely for the development and operation of the. PREMISES will require this Agreement as protection and security for lender ( "lender "). The term "lender" shall also mean the successors and assigns of the lender. 1.10.3 The CITY will acknowledge and consent to lender taking a first position security interest in this Agreement and the PREMISES; lender taking an assignment of the right, title, claim and interest of STARFIRE in this Agreement; lender obtaining the right of substitution for STARFIRE, lender taking possession of the PREMISES; lender operating the PREMISES pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and /or, lender selling, assigning and/or transferring STARFIRE's interest in this Agreement and /or the PREMISES; AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 2of31 1.11 Continued Park and Recreation Use. This Agreement and uses authorized herein are consistent in all respects with King County Resolution No. 34571 and the Intergovernmental Agreement. All covenants and restrictions contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT, and deed(s) transferring PARK to CITY are incorporated in this Agreement. Article 2. GROUND AND USE GRANT 2.1 PREMISES. 2.1.1 CITY hereby grants to STARFIRE an exclusive lease and use concession of ground, for the development, construction, and operation, of the PREMISES as described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Preliminary building and site plan is shown in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Any and all development, construction, and improvements of and to the PREMISES are owned by STARFIRE subject to security interest of lender, if any. At the termination of this Agreement, other than as a result of condemnation proceedings, the then existing improvements to the PREMISES will become the property of and owned by the CITY. 2.1.2 The common address of the PREMISES is 6800 Fort Dent Way, Tukwila WA, 98188. 2.2 Possession, Quiet Enjoyment & Covenants. Except as provided in Articles 4.10 & 4.13 herein, STARFIRE shall be entitled to exclusive possession and use of the PREMISES upon commencement of the development and construction of the PREMISES as defined by Article 6.4 herein. Upon taking possession of the PREMISES, and subject to STARFIRE's continuing performance and CITY's remedies under Agreement, STARFIRE shall peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the PREMISES at all times during the full term of this Agreement. Every covenant in this Agreement shall be deemed and treated to be a covenant running with the PREMISES during the full term of the Agreement, and shall extend to the heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns of the PARTIES. No change in CITY's ownership of the PREMISES, or rights to the payments hereunder, however accomplished, shall operate to enlarge the obligations or reduce the rights of STARFIRE. No change in CITY's ownership of the PREMISES shall be binding upon STARFIRE for any purpose until STARFIRE shall have been given notice thereof. Article 3. TERM OF AGREEMENT 3.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be forty (40) years, commencing upon the EFFECTIVE DATE. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 3 of 31 3.2 Option to Renew. The CITY and STARFIRE may renew this Agreement, contingent upon STARFIRE's full compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and CITY's written agreement to renew. The PARTIES may modify the Agreement during the term, as a condition of renewal, or during a renewal term, consistent with Section 9.13. Article 4. STARFIRE OBLIGATIONS 4.1 Agreement. STARFIRE agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 4.2 Not - For - Profit. STARFIRE will serve as the supervisory not - for - profit corporation for enhancement and ongoing operation of the FACILITIES. 4.3 Investment. STARFIRE will raise and invest $6 million in capital expenditures for the enhancement of the FACILITIES. 4.4 Athletic Center Building. STARFIRE will construct an athletic center building with two indoor soccer facilities and associated uses to provide training programs, league play, and tournaments to the youth and adults of the CITY and surrounding areas. 4.5 Fields — Turf. STARFIRE will construct three new lighted FIFA— sized, championship quality synthetic turf soccer fields and make these fields available to the youth and adults on teams from the CITY and surrounding areas. 4.6 Fields — Grass. 4.6.1 STARFIRE will improve and maintain three grass soccer fields and make these fields available to the youth and adults on soccer teams from the CITY and surrounding areas. 4.6.2 STARFIRE will maintain for the CITY the existing, northern most soccer field outside of the PREMISES, consistent with such standards applicable to other grass soccer fields maintained by STARFIRE within the PREMISES. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 4 of 31 4.7 Stadium. STARFIRE will install new seating, new FIFA -sized championship quality synthetic turf, and lights for a soccer stadium and make the stadium available to the youth and adult teams from the CITY and surrounding areas. 4.8 Softball Fields. STARFIRE may sublease the softball fields to a not - for - profit organization to enhance and operate the FACILITIES' softball fields and make these fields available to CITY -based leagues and tournaments, as well as regional and national tournaments. 4.9 Education - Scholarships. 4.9.1 STARFIRE will provide athletic skills, educational and development programs. STARFIRE will also provide team fee scholarships for disadvantaged youths from the CITY and surrounding areas. 4.9.2 STARFIRE, as part of it's community involvement program, will provide scholarships, grants, awards, and other benefits to the underprivileged. The CITY shall be entitled to designate scholarship recipients up to an aggregate amount equal to 12% of the amount set aside annually by STARFIRE for such scholarships but not to exceed $25,000 per year. Amounts not designated by the CITY in a calendar year shall be available for designation by STARFIRE throughout the community. Additionally, the CITY may request STARFIRE's consideration of requests in excess of the amounts set forth in this section for STARFIRE's discretionary scholarship and award program. 4.10 City 4th of July Celebration. STARFIRE will make all outdoor fields within the PREMISES available for use by the CITY during the annual 4th of July celebration. 4.11 STARFIRE Liaison. Upon request by CITY, STARFIRE will provide a dedicated contact person and liaison with the CITY for all permit and license applications, changes, and variances to f— r tnplete the FACILITIES in an expedited manner. 4.12 Facilities and Premises. STARFIRE will be fully responsible for all costs of improvement, operation and maintenance of the PREMISES, except as described in Section 5, below. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 4.12.1 Incidental Uses Page 5 of 31 STARFIRE may provide and/or authorize concessions, to include but not be limited to food and beverages; sale of incidental items directly related to the use of the FACILITIES including, but not limited to, athletic equipment, clothing, awards and related merchandise; soap, shampoo, sundries and supplies; and, day - care/babysitting, fitness, training and gym activities. 4.12.2 Security and Nuisance During Use STARFIRE shall take reasonable precautions in securing the PREMISES during the full term of this Agreement. STARFIRE shall use the PREMISES for no unlawful purposes and shall not use or occupy the PREMISES in any manner, which would constitute a public nuisance or violate State or CITY laws. 4.12.3 Operating Hours — Activities The availability of recreational opportunities for CITY residents is a material consideration for this Agreement. Accordingly and during the full term of this Agreement, STARFIRE shall continuously conduct and carry on STARFIRE's permitted uses and shall keep the PREMISES open for business and cause STARFIRE's business to be conducted therein during the usual business hours of each and every business day as mutually agreed upon. This provision shall not apply if the PREMISES should be closed and the business of STARFIRE is temporarily suspended on account of labor strikes, lockouts, or similar causes beyond the reasonable control of STARFIRE, or for maintenance, remodeling, repair, or renovation as approved by the CITY in writing (including approvals of any construction schedules.) STARFIRE covenants and agrees to provide sufficient personnel, and to keep the PREMISES adequately stocked with merchandise, recreational equipment, fixtures, and facilities so as to conduct its business in accordance with sound business practice. STARFIRE, in order to keep its business commitments, shall be in operation in accordance with sound business practice. 4.13 Entry by CITY. CITY may enter the PREMISES at all times to inspect; provide services required hereunder; post notices of STARFIRE's noncompliance with the provisions of this concession, all without being deemed a constructive eviction. Any person or persons who may have an interest in the purpose of CITY's visit may accompany CITY. CITY has the right to use any and all means that CITY deems proper to open doors and gates in an emergency in order to obtain entry to the PREMISES. 4.14 Health Inspections. STARFIRE shall not knowingly commit or willfully permit to be committed any act or thing contrary to the rules and regulations prescribed by the local board of health, or which shall be contrary to the laws, rules or regulations of any federal, state or municipal authority. STARFIRE shall allow the King County Health Department to make AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 6 of 31 regular and ordinary inspections of the PREMISES as said health department may deem proper. 4.15 Maintenance, Repair, & Improvements. 4.15.1 Maintenance STARFIRE shall, at its sole cost and expense, clean and maintain the PREMISES, and make repairs, restorations, and replacements to the PREMISES, including without limitation the heating, ventilating, air conditioning, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, structural roof, walls, and foundations, roof coverings, sprinkling and irrigation systems, playing surfaces and the fixtures and appurtenances to the PREMISES as and when needed to preserve them in "first class" condition and repair (less normal wear from use) throughout the full term. STARFIRE shall further keep in repair and maintain as necessary all machinery, equipment and facilities necessary for the playing of sports and the comfort of players. STARFIRE shall paint the exterior of the buildings (except the metal) with such frequency as may be required to maintain their good, clean appearance. All such repairs, restorations, and replacements will be in quality and workmanship at least equal to the original work or installations. If STARFIRE fails to make such repairs, restorations, or replacements within ninety (90) days of written notice by CITY, CITY may make them at the expense of STARFIRE and such expense will be paid by STARFIRE within fifteen (15) days after delivery of a statement for such expense. 4.15.2 Sidewalks Maintenance At its sole cost and expense, STARFIRE shall maintain any sidewalks on the PREMISES in good and presentable condition during the full term of this Agreement, shall be responsible for correcting any unsafe conditions, and shall be responsible for the removal of ice and snow from the sidewalks. 4.15.3 Janitorial Services At its sole cost and expense, STARFIRE shall keep the PREMISES clean, and shall provide sufficient janitorial services to maintain a tidy appearance on and about the PREMISES. STARFIRE shall provide landscaping maintenance services such that landscaping on the PREMISES remains healthy, attractive, and well maintained. 4.15.4 Repair of Damage In the event any damage or injury shall occur to the PREMISES of any kind or nature whatsoever, STARFIRE shall promptly cause said damage or injury to be fully repaired at STARFIRE's own cost and expense. In the event STARFIRE fails to accomplish such repairs within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice by the CITY, then in that event CITY may, but is not required to, enter the PREMISES and accomplish such repairs and bill STARFIRE who will pay the bill within fifteen (15) days after delivery of a statement for such expense. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 7of31 4.15.5 Improvements STARFIRE shall be solely responsible for providing adequate funding for any alterations or improvements as provided in this Agreement and such alterations or improvements shall be made without cost to the CITY, except as provided in Section 5.3. 4.15.6 Alterations of PREMISES after Construction After such time as the PREMISES have been completed and accepted as defined above, STARFIRE shall not make any material alteration to the PREMISES including any changes to the landscaping, without the CITY's prior written consent, such consent to not be unreasonably withheld. 4.16 Signs. STARFIRE may place and maintain signs upon the PREMISES in accordance with the sign ordinance of the CITY. 4.17 Utilities. 4.17.1 Utility Services and Expense STARFIRE will pay for all water, gas, garbage, sewage, electricity, telephone, and other utilities and communications services used by STARFIRE on the PREMISES, whether or not such services are billed directly to STARFIRE. STARFIRE will also procure, or cause to be procured, without cost to the CITY, any and all necessary permits, licenses, or other authorizations required for the lawful and proper installation and maintenance upon the PREMISES of utility appurtenances and appliances for use in supplying such utilities and services to and upon the PREMISES. The CITY, upon request of STARFIRE, and at the sole expense and liability of STARFIRE, will join with STARFIRE in any application required for obtaining or continuing any such services, provided that such services do not violate any other applicable provision of this Agreement. The CITY shall not be held liable for any injury, loss, or damage caused by or resulting from any interruption or failure of utility services due to any cause whatsoever, except the CITY's sole negligence. STARFIRE shall not be entitled to any offset, reduction, or return of consideration as a result of any interruption or failure of services. 4.17.2 Trash & Garbage STARFIRE shall place all trash and garbage into such areas and containers as are designed and intended to accommodate the trash and garbage generated within or on the PREMISES. STARFIRE shall not allow trash and /or garbage to accumulate such that a nuisance or health hazard results. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 8 of 31 4.18 Hazardous Substances. . 4.18.1 Definition As used herein, the term "Hazardous Substance" means any hazardous, toxic, or dangerous substance, waste, or material, which is or becomes regulated under any federal, state, or local statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or other law now or hereafter in affect pertaining to environmental protection, contamination, or cleanup. 4.18.2 Information STARFIRE shall keep upon the PREMISES, in a location accessible to CITY, on request during normal business hours, copies of all reports regarding hazardous or toxic materials in the PREMISES that STARFIRE has provided to any governmental agency in the previous quarter. STARFIRE shall, upon request by CITY and at STARFIRE's expense, provide CITY with a copy of any such report. In the event of any accident, spill, or other incident involving hazardous or toxic matter that STARFIRE is required to report to any governmental agency, STARFIRE shall immediately report the same to the CITY and supply CITY with all information and reports with respect to the same, together with STARFIRE's clean-up or remediation plan and schedule. If such clean -up or remediation plan is not acceptable to CITY in CITY's sole discretion, CITY may so notify STARFIRE and, upon 48 hours prior written notice (or without notice if so required by an emergency) may enter on the PREMISES to conduct the cleanup or remediation and charge STARFIRE the costs thereof. All information described herein shall be provided to CITY regardless of any claim by STARFIRE that it is confidential or privileged, provided that the CITY shall not publish or disclose the information to any third party except as pursuant to Chapter 42.17 RCW. 4.18.3 Indemnification STARFIRE agrees to hold harmless, protect, indemnify, and defend CITY from and against any damage, loss, claim, or liability, INCLUDING Attorney's fees and costs, resulting from STARFIRE's use, disposal, transportation, generation, and/or sale of any Hazardous Substances. The CITY agrees to hold harmless, protect, indemnify, and defend STARFIRE from and against any damage, loss, claim, or liability, including attorney's fees and costs, resulting from (a) Hazardous Substances existing on the PREMISES as of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this Agreement; or (b) Hazardous Substances thereafter used, disposed of, or generated on the PREMISES by the CITY. These indemnities will survive the termination of this Agreement, whether by expiration of the Term or otherwise. 4.19 Risk of Loss. All personal property of any kind or description whatsoever on the PREMISES shall be at STARFIRE's sole risk, and CITY shall not be liable for any damage done to, AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 9 of 31 or loss of, such personal property. However, STARFIRE is not responsible for losses or claims of stolen property during the CITY's use periods. Article 5. CITY OBLIGATIONS 5.1 Agreement. CITY agrees to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 5.2 Picnic - Play Areas - Stormwater. The CITY will maintain all existing picnic, barbecue, restrooms, play and other community - access areas located within the PARK that are not part of the PREMISES, including water retention facilities and lift stations, consistent with such standards applicable to other municipal parks owned and operated by the CITY. 5.3 Streets - Parking. 5.3.1 The CITY will maintain all streets, bridges, and parking areas, including landscaping, located within or adjacent to or providing access to and egress from the PARK and the PREMISES, consistent with applicable CITY standards. 5.3.2 The CITY will be responsible to provide adequate parking to support the PREMISES and its operations. 5.4 Levee - Trails. The CITY will maintain, or cause to be maintained by others, the levee and trails outside the PREMISES but within the PARK, consistent with applicable CITY and Kin& County standards.- 5.5 Naming Rights - Signs - Zoning. 5.5.1 The CITY grants to STARFIRE all rights to PREMISES naming, and advertising. Provided, however, the reference "Tukwila," "City of Tukwila," or other reference to "Tukwila" as approved by the CITY shall be incorporated into names and signage when feasible. The CITY agrees to work with STARFIRE to modify the sign code to facilitate appropriate signage for the PREMISES and its events. 5.5.2 The CITY agrees to work with STARFIRE to modify the zoning code to facilitate the development of any FACILITIES not otherwise permitted outright under the zoning code. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 10 of 31 5.6 Directional Signs. The CITY will install directional signage to the FACILITIES as appropriate in various locations throughout the CITY. 5.7 Liquor License. The CITY will support STARFIRE obtaining a liquor license for the FACILITIES through the established City Council approval process. 5.8 Public Safety. The CITY will provide police and fire services to the PARK and the PREMISES consistent with applicable CITY standards. 5.9 Permitting. The CITY will attempt to expedite all permits, licenses and other municipal approvals required for completion and operation of the FACILITIES. 5.10 City Liaison. The CITY will provide a dedicated contact person and liaison with STARFIRE for all permit and license applications, changes, and variances to complete the FACILITIES in an expedited manner. 5.11 Promotion. The CITY's tourism and marketing department will use its best efforts to promote and support the FACILITIES within the business community for the benefit of CITY and the enhanced recreational use of the PARK. 5.12 Fees and Charges. CITY grants and authorizes STARFIRE to establish and collect rents, fees and charges, and retain all revenues, including special event/tournament parking revenues, for use of FACILITIES; excluding the 4th of July. Provided, however, STARFIRE will be subject to the City Parking Tax. Article 6. DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION OF PREMISES 6.1 Design. 6.1.1 STARFIRE shall retain a licensed architect or licensed professional engineer, registered in the State of Washington, who shall design the FACILITIES and exterior landscaping (the PREMISES), which shall visually blend with AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 11 of 31 the setting. The CITY shall have the right to approve the final design of the PREMISES consistent with established CITY zoning and /or design code. 6.1.2 Where required by applicable provisions of law, STARFIRE shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) in the design, construction, and operation of the PREMISES. 6.2 Building & Site Plans /Access Easement. STARFIRE shall retain a licensed architect or licensed professional engineer, registered in the State of Washington, to prepare building and site plans for the PREMISES, which shall reference the structure, utilities generally, and landscape plan. The CITY shall have the right to approve the final building and site plans, such approvals to not be unreasonably withheld. Upon its approval of the final building and site plans, the CITY will grant to STARFIRE an access easement from the PREMISES to the public right -of -way. Upon being granted, the access easement shall run for the term of this Agreement and shall be part of the PREMISES. 6.3 Construction /Site Work /Fencing. STARFIRE shall be solely responsible for all development and construction of the PREMISES and shall be responsible for the site work, all required permits and grading. STARFIRE shall properly barricade the work area and install signage directing unauthorized person from entering onto the building site during any phase of development or construction. Unless otherwise agreed fencing shall be placed around the work area. In addition, the building site shall be kept in a clean and organized condition during development periods. STARFIRE shall be responsible for site security, traffic and pedestrian warnings at the site during the development and construction phases. 6.4 Construction Deadlines. 6.4.1 STARFIRE shall be required to commence development of the PREMISES within six (6) months of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this Agreement. Commencement of development of the PREMISES is defined as that date upon which STARFIRE files its first application for a project permit, as defined in RCW 36.70B.020(4). 6.4.2 STARFIRE shall be required to complete the development and construction of the PREMISES within one (1) year of the EFFECTIVE DATE of this Agreement. Completion of the development and construction of the PREMISES is defined as that date upon which all final occupancy permits are obtained by STARFIRE for all structures on the PREMISES. 6.4.3 STARFIRE may phase construction of FACILITIES on the PREMISES. PROVIDED, within one (1) year of commencement of construction, the FACILITIES shall have completed construction sufficient to provide, for use under this AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 12 of 31 Agreement, athletic and recreation fields in a condition and to an extent in excess of that provided at PARK as of the EFFECTIVE DATE. 6.5 Failure to Meet Construction Deadlines /Time of Essence. 6.5.1 Except as provided in Section 9.15 herein, it is mutually understood and agreed that failure by STARFIRE to meet the development and construction deadlines shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement by STARFIRE and the CITY, at its option, can terminate this Agreement for cause pursuant to Article 8. Time is of the essence with this Agreement. 6.5.2 Notwithstanding Section 6.4 and 6.5.1, STARFIRE's obligation to commence construction shall not begin until the CITY has issued its building permit for the FACILITIES. 6.6 Stormwater Drainage, Sewer, & Water Lines. STARFIRE will be responsible for relocating storm drains, sewers, and water lines to the PREMISES, as required to complete development and construction of the PREMISES. 6.7 Development and Construction Fees & Expenses. 6.7.1 STARFIRE shall be responsible for obtaining and paying for necessary permits, fees, and expenses associated with the development and construction of the PREMISES. In addition, STARFIRE shall be responsible for any additional costs for inspections billed to the CITY by any government agency, including but not limited to the City of Tukwila, King County, or the State of Washington. 6.7.2 Notwithstanding Section 6.7.1, STARFIRE shall not be obligated to pay permit fees, CITY utility connection charges (if any), and expenses, including any transportation impact or environmental mitigation fees in an aggregate amount in excess of $100,000.00 excluding utility meter fees. CITY shall be responsible for any such fees in excess of the amount set forth in this Section 6.7.2. k 6.8 Not a Public Works Project. 6.8.1 The development and construction of the PREMISES is not a public works project requiring the payment of prevailing wages. STARFIRE is the developer and the CITY is not an owner, partner, joint venturer, nor maintains any other business relationship with STARFIRE. The CITY is not involved with, nor has any responsibilities for, the bidding, contracting or operations of the PREMISES and will occupy no space in or enjoy use of the PREMISES. STARFIRE does not deem itself required to pay prevailing wages nor will STARFIRE be obligated to pay or to contract for prevailing wages or any other standard of payment controls associated with this project. This provision is a material part of the consideration for this Agreement. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 13 of 31 6.8.2 The project signage and all literature, advertising by either the CITY or STARFIRE shall not indicate in any manner that this is a CITY project, contract, or other misleading statement indicating that this project is a public work project directly or indirectly. 6.9 No Liens. Except liens and encumbrances of any lender pursuant to Article 6 herein, it is mutually understood and agreed that STARFIRE shall have no authority, express or implied, to create or place any lien or encumbrance of any kind or nature whatsoever upon, or in any manner to bind, the interest of the CITY in the fee interest in the PREMISES retained by CITY or the PARK, or to charge the rentals payable hereunder for any claim in favor of any person dealing with STARFIRE, including those who may furnish materials or perform labor for any construction or repairs, and each such claim shall affect and each such lien shall attach to, if at all, only the right and interest granted to STARFIRE by this Agreement. If any such liens are filed, CITY may, without waiving its rights and remedies for breach, and without releasing STARFIRE from its obligations hereunder, require STARFIRE to post security in form and amount reasonably satisfactory to CITY or cause such liens to be released by any means CITY deems proper, including payment in satisfaction of the claim giving rise to the lien. STARFIRE shall pay to CITY upon demand any sum paid by CITY to remove the liens. Further, STARFIRE agrees that it will save and hold the CITY harmless from any and all loss, cost, or expenses based on or arising out of the asserted claims or liens, except those of the lender, against this Agreement or against the right, title, and interest of the CITY in the PREMISES and the PARK or under the terms of this Agreement, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred by CITY in removing such liens, and in enforcing this paragraph. Additionally, it is mutually understood and agreed that this paragraph is intended to be a continuing provision applicable to future repairs and improvements after the initial construction phase. 6.10 Insurance and Indemnification Requirements During Construction. 6.10.1 Indemnification / Hold Harmless STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors and subcontractors to defend, indemnify and hold the CITY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the CITY. 6.10.2 Commercial General Liability Insurance STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors to procure and maintain, for the duration of construction of the facility, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 14of31 the work hereunder by the construction contractors and subcontractors, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. All said policies shall name the City of Tukwila as an additional named insured and shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or reduction in the amount of said policies except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY. STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors to maintain minimum commercial general liability insurance limits of no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and a $2,000,000 products - completed operations aggregate limit. 6.10.3 Builders Risk Insurance STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors to procure and maintain, for the duration of construction of the facility, Builders Risk insurance covering interests of the CITY and the construction contractor in the work. Builders Risk insurance shall be on a all -risk policy form and shall insure against the perils of fire and extended coverage and physical loss or damage including flood and earthquake, theft, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, temporary buildings and debris removal. This Builders Risk insurance covering the work will have a deductible of $5,000 for each occurrence, which will be the responsibility of the construction contractor. Higher deductibles for flood and earthquake perils may be accepted by the CITY upon written request by STARFIRE and written acceptance by the CITY. Any increased deductibles accepted by the CITY will remain the responsibility of the construction contractor. The Builders Risk insurance shall be maintained until final acceptance of the work by STARFIRE. STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors to maintain Builders Risk insurance in the amount of the completed value of the project with no coinsurance provisions. 6.10.4 Subcontractors STARFIRE shall require its construction contractors to include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for the construction contractor. 6.10.5 Verification of Coverage STARFIRE shall furnish the CITY with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the Commercial General Liability insurance of the construction contractor before commencement of the work. Before any exposure to loss may occur, STARFIRE shall file with the CITY a copy of the Builders Risk insurance policy that includes all applicable conditions, exclusions, definitions, terms and endorsements related to this project. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 15 of 31 Article 7. FINANCING & SECURITY INTERESTS 7.1 Financing - No CITY Obligation. STARFIRE shall be solely responsible for all financing requirements for all construction, maintenance, repairs, or subsequent improvements to the PREMISES. The CITY shall be under no obligation directly or indirectly to pay for any labor, material, or improvement associated with the PREMISES except as provided herein or mutually agreed upon. STARFIRE shall, in applying and obtaining financing, inform any lender that the CITY has no financial obligations associated with the construction, maintenance, repairs or subsequent improvements to the PREMISES. 7.2 Mortgages - Generally. STARFIRE, and its successors and assigns, shall have the unrestricted right to mortgage its interests under this Agreement, subject, however, to the limitations herein. As used herein, "Leasehold Mortgage" shall include any such mortgage(s) or deed(s) of trust on the Estate created by this Agreement; "Purchase Money Mortgage" shall include any Mortgage granted to STARFIRE (or STARFIRE's successors) in connection with the sale of the interest in this Agreement; and "Estate" shall mean the estate of STARFIRE created by this Agreement upon and subject to all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any such Mortgage shall be subject to the rights of CITY hereunder in accordance with all the terms and conditions of this Agreement. In no circumstances and under no condition shall CITY's fee interest in the PARK be encumbered by, subject to or subordinate to a Mortgage. 7.3 Security Interest in PREMISES & Agreement /Consent. The CITY consents to the grant, transfer, pledge and assignment of any and all right, title, claim, interest of STARFIRE in and to this Agreement and in the PREMISES, and in any building facility, personal property and fixtures in the PREMISES ( "Collateral ") to lender for financing purposes. The CITY shall recognize lender's first priority security interest in the Collateral and the CITY hereby subordinates any and all interest of the CITY in said Collateral to lender. STARFIRE acknowledges that the CITY will not grant any security interest to any lender in CITY real property nor will the CITY allow any encumbrance of any kind or nature whatsoever upon, or in any manner on its title to CITY real property. In the event of default by STARFIRE to lender, in addition to all its rights and remedies available at law and equity, lender may enforce and/or foreclose its security interest/interests in the Collateral. CITY agrees that in connection with any such default, and all without further consent of CITY, lender may: 7.3.1 Acquire STARFIRE's interest in the Collateral either by a deed in lieu of foreclosure or actual foreclosure; AGREEMENT Page 16 of 31 50367676.02 7.3.2 Rent and/or grant a ground and use concession of the PREMISES subject to this Agreement pending foreclosure of the Collateral by lender; 7.3.3 Assign, sell and/or transfer the Collateral in whole or in part to any person or entity; 7.3.4 Take possession of any or all of the Collateral, obtain right of substitution for STARFIRE and operate said Collateral; and /or 7.3.5 Appoint a receiver. 7.4 LENDER's Reliance on Term. The CITY acknowledges that STARFIRE, in making application for financing, may be required to have an assurance that the terms of this Agreement will extend beyond the term of the financing term. By its signature to this Agreement, the CITY confirms its authority to provide the forty (40) year Agreement term conditioned solely upon STARFIRE maintaining current payments and remaining in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Additionally, the CITY acknowledges that, after any original financing commitments by STARFIRE have been satisfied, these financing provisions shall be applicable to all future advances or financing required by STARFIRE and used solely for the improvements and repairs of the PREMISES. 7.5 Surrender of the Collateral. No surrender of Collateral or the PREMISES subject to this Agreement or any other act of STARFIRE shall be deemed to terminate this Agreement. CITY will not terminate this Agreement voluntarily by agreement with STARFIRE unless lender has been previously notified in writing and has consented to the termination in writing. This Agreement shall not be amended or modified unless lender has been previously notified in writing and has consented to such amendment or modification in writing. 7.6 Notice of Default and Lender's Rights. 7.6.1 Notice of Default If STARFIRE defaults under this Agreement or if any event occurs which would give CITY the right to terminate, modify, amend or shorten the term of this Agreement, CITY shall take no steps to exercise any right it may have under this Agreement without first giving lender written notice of such default in accordance with Article 7.12 below. A copy of each and every notice of default served or sent by CITY or its agent to or upon STARFIRE pursuant to this Agreement shall be sent contemporaneously to lender in accordance with Article 7.12 below. Such notice of default shall specify the event or events of default then outstanding and the time period at the end of which the indicated action would become effective. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 17 of 31 7.6.2 Termination for Monetary Default If the notice of default given by CITY to lender relates to a monetary default and STARFIRE has not cured such monetary default within thirty (30) days after lender receives the notice and STARFIRE's failure to cure results in CITY desiring to terminate this Agreement, CITY may terminate this Agreement if such monetary default is not cured by either STARFIRE or lender within forty -five (45) days after lender receives the notice of default. 7.6.3 Termination for Non - Monetary Default If the notice of default given by CITY to lender relates to a non - monetary default and STARFIRE has not cured, or diligently pursued curing, such non - monetary default within thirty (30) days after lender receives the notice, CITY shall take no action to terminate this Agreement if: a. Within sixty (60) days after CITY's notice to lender regarding STARFIRE's failure to cure (or failure to diligently pursue a cure) lender notifies CITY of its intent to realize upon its security interest and commences realization within sixty (60) days thereafter, and diligently pursues realization; and b. Lender pays CITY at time of notification all monies or performances due that may be in default up to the day lender notifies CITY of lender's intent and further pays or performs all consideration that accrues during the period after lender so notifies CITY and completes such other performances that may be required or come due under this Agreement. CITY shall not terminate this Agreement because of STARFIRE's breach of any terms of this Agreement relating to the solvency of STARFIRE or the institution of any bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or related action by or against STARFIRE as long as lender cures any default under this Agreement by STARFIRE as provided herein, except that lender shall not be required to cure any defaults relating to solvency of STARFIRE. 7.7 Right to Assign. Lender shall have the right to assign its interest in the Collateral. Upon the purchaser's, assignee's or transferee's assumption and agreement to perform and be bound by all of the teens of this Agreement, lender shall be relieved from further liability under this Agreement. If a lender finances the purchaser, assignee or transferee, said lender shall be subject to all obligations as set forth in this Agreement. 7.8 Disposition of Insurance. Should the Collateral suffer any loss which is covered by casualty insurance, and the insurance proceeds are used to restore any improvements made by STARFIRE, CITY AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 18 of 31 agrees that STARFIRE and lender shall have the right to such proceeds so long as none of CITY's property, utilities or other services therein are damaged or such damages are repaired. In the event the CITY's land is substantially damaged and STARFIRE's improvements have been repaired, CITY shall only participate in the insurance proceeds to the extent necessary to repair and restore CITY's land and any of CITY's improvements on or in the ground to the same condition the land was at the commencement of this Agreement, or in the same condition at the time of the casualty. Other than as described herein, CITY shall have no claim to insurance proceeds that are attributable to STARFIRE's interest in the Collateral. 7.9 Right to Participate in Litigation. Lender shall have the right to participate in any litigation, arbitration or dispute directly affecting the Collateral or interest of STARFIRE or lender therein, including, without limitation, any suit, action, arbitration proceeding, condemnation proceeding or insurance claim. CITY, upon instituting or receiving notice of any such litigation, arbitration or dispute will promptly notify lender of the same. 7.10 Incorporation of Lender's Protection Provisions. Lender shall be a beneficiary of all rights of STARFIRE herein including but not limited to the warranty, indemnity, hold harmless, choice of law and venue, costs and attorney's fees as provided herein. 7.11 Right to Remove Collateral. In the event lender exercises its rights under its Collateral and realizes upon the Collateral, CITY agrees that lender is entitled to remove the Collateral, including but not limited to building facility, furniture, movable trade fixtures and equipment, from the PREMISES at any reasonable time and that the Collateral shall remain personal property even though the trade fixtures may be affixed to or placed upon the PREMISES. In the event lender so realizes on its Collateral, CITY waives any right, title, claim, lien or interest in the Collateral. 7.12 Notices. All notices, copies of notices, consents or other communications to lender given under this Agreement to lender must be in writing and shall be effective when received. Such communications shall be given in person to an officer of lender, addressed to lender at an address as provided by lender. AGREEMENT Page 19 of 31 50367676.02 Article 8. TERMINATION 8.1 Failure to Perform. 8.1.1 Obligation to Perform Nothing herein shall imply any duty upon CITY to do any work, which under any provision of this concession STARFIRE may be required to perform, and the performance thereof by CITY shall not constitute a waiver of STARFIRE's default. CITY shall not in any event be liable for inconvenience, annoyance, and disturbance in its activities in the PARK, however shall not permit a loss of business, or other damage to STARFIRE by reason of its actions pertaining to the PARK. 8.1.2 Payments to Other Parties Except as otherwise expressly provided hereunder, all obligations of STARFIRE under this Agreement will be performed by STARFIRE at STARFIRE's sole cost and expense. If STARFIRE fails to pay any sum of money owed to any party other than CITY for which STARFIRE is liable hereunder, or if STARFIRE fails to perform any other act on its part to be performed hereunder, and such failure continues for ten days after notice thereof by CITY, CITY may, without waiving or releasing STARFIRE from its obligations, make any such payment or perform any such other act to be made or performed by STARFIRE. STARFIRE shall pay CITY, on demand, all sums so paid by CITY and all necessary incidental costs, together with interest thereon at the lesser of 1Y2 percent per month or the maximum rate permissible by law, from the date of such payment by CITY. 8.2 Default. 8.2.1 CITY's Default CITY will not be in default unless CITY fails to perform an obligation within sixty (60) days after notice by STARFIRE, which notice must specify the alleged breach; provided that if the nature of CITY's obligation is such that more than sixty (60) days are reasonably required for cure, then CITY will not be in default if CITY commences to cure within sixty (60) days of STARFIRE's notice and thereafter diligently pursues completion and completes performance within a reasonable time. 8.2.2 STARFIRE's Default The occurrence of any one or more of the following events constitutes a default under this Agreement by STARFIRE: (1) STARFIRE shall be in default of the performance of any covenants, conditions, or provisions of this Agreement, other than the covenants for the payment of consideration required by this Agreement, where such failure continues for a period of sixty (60) days after written notice is given by CITY provided that if the nature of STARFIRE's obligations is such that more than sixty (60) AGREEMENT Page 20 of 31 50367676.02 days are reasonably required for cure, STARFIRE will not be in default if STARFIRE commences to cure within sixty (60) days of CITY's notice and thereafter diligently pursues completion and completes performance within a reasonable time; or (2) STARFIRE shall be adjudged a bankrupt, make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or take the benefit of any insolvency act, or if a permanent receiver and trustee in bankruptcy shall be appointed for STARFIRE's estate and such appointment is not vacated within sixty (60) days; or (3) PREMISES become vacant or deserted for a period of sixty (60) days; or (4) if this Agreement shall be assigned or the PREMISES sublet other than in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days after written notice to STARFIRE; or (5) STARFIRE shall fail to make any payment when due, or fail to make any other payment required hereunder when due, when that failure is not cured within thirty (30) days after mailing of written notice thereof by CITY. 8.2.3 Default for Other Cause This Agreement may be immediately terminated for other cause by a party if the other party substantially fails to perform its obligations under this Agreement, through no fault of the terminating party, and the non - performing party does not commence correction of the failure of performance within sixty (60) days of the terminating party's sending notice to the non - performing party. 8.3 Remedies Are Cumulative. Remedies under this Agreement are cumulative; the failure to exercise on any occasion any right shall not operate to forfeit such remedy. 8.4 Destruction of PREMISES & Use of Insurance Proceeds. 8.4.1 Unless otherwise mutually agreed by the PARTIES, in the event the PREMISES are destroyed or injured by fire, earthquake, or other casualty, then STARFIRE shall proceed to rebuild and restore the PREMISES, or such part thereof as may be injured as aforesaid. In the event of any loss covered by the insurance policies described and required pursuant to Article 9.5.1 herein, unless this Agreement shall be terminated as provided herein, the proceeds of such insurance policies shall be used by STARFIRE first to rebuild and restore the PREMISES and replace the improvements, fixtures, and equipment, which may be damaged or destroyed by such casualty. 8.4.2 Notwithstanding the forgoing, in the event the PREMISES are destroyed by fire, earthquake or other casualty STARFIRE may elect to restore the PREMISES to a condition equivalent to or better than existed as of the EFFECTIVE DATE, and terminate the AGREEMENT without further obligation except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. AGREEM ENT 50367676.02 Page 21 of 31 8.5 Duties upon Termination. Upon termination of this agreement, and unless otherwise arranged, STARFIRE shall remove from the PARK all its personal property, goods, and effects. In the event that STARFIRE fails to perform this duty at termination, the CITY may cause such removal to be made and said personal property, goods, and effects to be stored, the cost and expense to be paid by STARFIRE. It is mutually understood and agreed that the real property constituting the PREMISES of this Agreement is the real property of the CITY and that all improvements to said real property shall revert to the CITY at the termination of this Agreement. 8.6 Eminent Domain. The following rules shall govern the rights and duties of the PARTIES in the event of interference with STARFIRE's use on possession of the PREMISES as a result of the exercise of eminent domain or private purchase in lieu thereof. 8.6.1 Rights of Termination If the whole of the PREMISES shall be taken for any public or quasi - public use under any statute or by right of eminent domain, or by private purchase in lieu thereof, then this Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the date that title shall be taken. If more than twenty -five percent (25 %) of the PREMISES shall be so taken and if the taking renders the remainder thereof unusable for the purposes for which the PREMISES were concessioned, then CITY and STARFIRE shall each have the right to terminate this Agreement on thirty (30) days notice to the other given within ninety (90) days after the date of such taking. Provided, however, that if the CITY is exercising its rights of eminent domain, a fair value shall be placed on this Agreement and the PREMISES with the compensation thereof awarded solely to STARFIRE, or lender pursuant to its security interest, if any. 8.6.2 Non - Termination If any part of the PREMISES shall be so taken and this Agreement is not terminated, then the CITY shall, at its own cost and expense, restore the remaining portion of the PREMISES to the extent necessary to render it reasonably suitable for the purposes for which it was concessioned. 8.6.3 Compensation The compensation awarded or paid upon such a total or partial taking of the PREMISES and /or this Agreement shall belong to and be apportioned between the CITY and STARFIRE in accordance with their respective interests under this Agreement as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. Additionally, STARFIRE may prosecute any claim directly against the condemning authority for the costs of removal of the goodwill, stock, trade fixtures, furniture and other personal property belonging to AGREEMENT Page 22 of 31 50367676.02 STARFIRE. CITY shall have no claim to condemnation proceeds that are attributable to STARFIRE's interest in the Collateral, nor shall lender have any interest in CITY's condemnation proceeds, if any. Article 9. GENERAL CONDITIONS 9.1 Relationship of PARTIES. 9.1.1 Independent Status The PARTIES intend that an independent relationship shall be created by this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture between the parties hereto, and neither the method of computation of consideration nor any other provision contained herein shall be deemed to create any relationship between the parties hereto other than the relationship of CITY as granting a ground and use concession to STARFIRE. STARFIRE has the experience, ability, and resources to develop and operate the FACILITIES and is performing independent functions and responsibilities within its field of expertise. STARFIRE, its personnel and agents are independent contractors and not employees of the CITY. No agent, employee, servant, or representative of STARFIRE shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the CITY. STARFIRE and its personnel have no authority to bind the CITY or to control the CITY's employees. As an independent contractor, STARFIRE is responsible for its own management. The CITY's administration and enforcement of this Agreement shall not be deemed an exercise of managerial control over STARFIRE or its personnel. 9.1.2 No Third Party Rights Created It is mutually understood and agreed that this Agreement is solely for the benefit of the PARTIES hereto and gives no right to any other party except as provided by Article 7 herein. 9.1.3 Joint Venture /Partnership It is mutually understood and agreed that no joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this Agreement. 9.2 Notices. Except as provided in Article 7 herein, any notice required or permitted hereunder must be in writing and will be effective upon the earlier of personal delivery or three days after being mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to STARFIRE or to CITY at the address for that party designated herein. Either party may specify a different address for notice purposes by written notice to the other, except that CITY may in any event use the PREMISES as STARFIRE's address for notice purposes. All notices shall be delivered to the following addresses: AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 23 of 31 CITY Address City of Tukwila Attn: City Administrator 6200 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, WA 98188 STARFIRE Address Starfire Sports Attn: Christopher Slatt P.O. Box 48299 Burien, WA 98148 -0299 9.3 Reports & Information. When requested by the CITY, STARFIRE shall furnish periodic reports and documents on matters covered by this Agreement. The reports and documents shall be furnished in the time and form requested. STARFIRE shall maintain accounting records in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for non - profit entities. 9.4 Permits, Licenses, Taxes, & Fees. 9.4.1 Permits, Licenses, & Other Documents STARFIRE shall possess a current Tukwila Business License and shall obtain all regulatory licenses and permits, including all construction and building permits, necessary to fulfill STARFIRE's obligations under this Agreement at STARFIRE's sole expense. Each party agrees to execute such additional or other documents as may be required to fully implement the intent of this Agreement. 9.4.2 Taxes & Fees As an independent contractor, STARFIRE shall be solely responsible for all taxes, fees and charges incurred, including but not limited to license fees, business and occupation taxes, workers' compensation and unemployment benefits, all federal, state, regional, county and local taxes and fees, including income taxes, property taxes, permit fees, operating fees, surcharges of any kind that apply to any and all persons, facilities, property, income, equipment, materials, supplies or activities related to STARFIRE's obligations under this Agreement. 9.4.3 Leasehold Excise CITY shall be responsible for payment of leasehold excise tax, if any, under this Agreement. 9.4.4 Admissions Tax The CITY acknowledges that STARFIRE, as a non - profit entity, is not subject to the CITY's admissions tax. In the event the CITY's admissions tax is made applicable to non - profit entities, including STARFIRE, all amounts collected and paid by STARFIRE AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 24 of 31 to CITY as admissions taxes shall be a credit against (i.e., deducted from) amounts otherwise payable by STARFIRE to CITY under this Agreement. 9.5 Insurance. 9.5.1 Fire, Earthquake, & Casualty Insurance STARFIRE agrees that, at all times during the full term of this Agreement and at its own expense, STARFIRE shall, at its sole cost and expense, maintain in full force and effect adequate fire, flood, earthquake, and other casualty coverage covering the PREMISES and its contents, including all personal property, fixtures, and improvements. Such policy shall include a replacement cost endorsement. STARFIRE shall obtain and file with the CITY's Risk Manager a Certificate of Insurance evidencing such coverage. All such insurance coverage shall include a thirty -day cancellation notice to STARFIRE and the CITY. Adequacy of coverage is defined as insurance sufficient to restore the PREMISES to its pre - casualty condition. 9.5.2 Liability Insurance Prior to the commencement date of this Agreement, STARFIRE, at its own expense shall obtain and file with the CITY's Risk Manager a Certificate of Insurance evidencing commercial general liability insurance coverage ( "CGL ") providing coverage of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 general aggregate. This Certificate of Insurance shall be subject to approval by the CITY's Risk Manager as to company, terms and coverage, and said approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The CGL shall name the CITY as an additional insured and must fully protect the CITY from any and all claims and risks and losses in connection with any activities or omissions by STARFIRE by virtue of this Agreement. The CGL policy shall remain in full force and effect at STARFIRE's sole expense for liability for property damage or personal injury that may occur in connection with activities or omissions by STARFIRE, and provide coverage for the full term of this Agreement. STARFIRE shall insure that the CITY's Risk Manager is given thirty - calendar days prior written notice, by certified mail, of any cancellation, lapse, reduction or modification of such insurance. 9.5.3 Release and Waiver of Subrogation Any policy of insurance carried by either CITY or STARFIRE pursuant to any obligation under this Agreement, shall, to the extent available, contain a waiver of subrogation clause on the part of the insurer. Such waiver shall apply to damages to adjacent property. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, neither CITY nor STARFIRE shall be liable to the other party or to any insurance company (by subrogation or otherwise) insuring the other party for any loss or damage to any building, structure or tangible personal property of the other occurring in or about the PREMISES or PARK, even though such loss or damage might have been occasioned by the negligence of such party, its agents or employees, if such loss or, damage is covered by property insurance issued by an insurance carrier authorized or licensed by the Insurance AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 25 of 31 Commissioner of the State of Washington to issue lines of insurance, benefiting the party suffering such loss or damage or was required under the terms of this Agreement to be covered by insurance by the party covering the loss. 9.6 Hold Harmless, Indemnification, & Industrial Insurance. 9.6.1 Hold Harmless & Indemnification Each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its own wrongful or negligent acts or omissions, or those of its officers, agents, or employees to the fullest extent required by law. Each party agrees to save, indemnify, defend, or hold the other party harmless against all liability, loss, damages, and expenses, including costs and attorney's fees, resulting from actions, claims and lawsuits arising or alleged to have arisen, in whole or in part, out of or in consequence of the acts or failures to act of the other party, its employees, its subcontractors, its agents, or its assigns, which arise in any way out of the performance of this Agreement. In the case of negligence of both the . CITY and STARFIRE, any damages allowed shall be levied in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to each party, and each party shall have the right to seek contribution from the other party in proportion to the percentage of negligence attributable to the other party. 9.6.2 Industrial Insurance The PARTIES have specifically negotiated STARFIRE's waiver of its immunity under Title 51 RCW, which is hereby waived for purposes of STARFIRE's indemnification and hold harmless of the CITY, including the duty to defend. This provision shall be inapplicable to the extent such action, claim, or lawsuit is judicially found to arise solely from the acts or failures to act of the CITY. 9.7 Successors & Assigns. 9.7.1 The CITY and STARFIRE each agree to be bound to the other party in respect to all covenants, agreements, and obligations contained in this Agreement. Except as provided in Article 7 and 9.7.2 herein, neither party shall assign the Agreement in part or as a whole, without the written consent of the other. Except as provided in Article 4.8 herein, STARFIRE shall not sublease any of the PREMISES, without written notice to and approval of the CITY. 9.7.2 The CITY acknowledges that STARFIRE is authorized under this Agreement, without further CITY approval, to enter into space leases, rental agreements, and /or grant sub - concessions within the PREMISES for individual facility operations; food and beverage services; athletic equipment operation, sales and service; and, similar supporting concessions consistent with Section 4.12.1. 9.7.3 When requested, approval by the CITY of a subcontract or assignment shall not be unreasonably withheld. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Page 26 of 31 9.7.4 In the event of an assignment, subcontracting, or delegation of duties, STARFIRE shall remain responsible for the full and faithful performance of this Agreement and the assignee, subcontractor, or other obligor shall also become responsible to the CITY for the satisfactory performance of the services, facilities, or equipment assumed. The CITY may condition approval upon the delivery by the assignee, subcontractor, or other obligor of its covenant to the CITY to fully and faithfully complete the requirements or responsibility undertaken under this Agreement. 9.7.5 Notwithstanding the foregoing, provided STARFIRE is not in default, STARFIRE may assign its interest in this Agreement without seeking CITY's consent to a parent or subsidiary. Except as otherwise provided herein, all of the covenants, conditions, and provisions of this Agreement are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the PARTIES and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns. 9.8 Bankruptcy. Except as provided in Article 7 herein, PARTIES agree that if STARFIRE is adjudged bankrupt, either voluntarily or involuntarily, then this AGREEMENT, at the option of the CITY, may be terminated effective on the day and at the time the bankruptcy petition is filed. 9.9 Compliance with Laws. STARFIRE, its officers, employees, and agents shall comply with applicable federal, state, county, and local laws, statutes, rules, regulations, and ordinances, in performing its obligations under this Agreement. Such compliance shall include abiding by all applicable federal, state and local policies to ensure equal employment opportunity based on ability and fitness to all persons regardless of race, creed, color, national origin, religion, sex, physical handicaps or age. STARFIRE shall comply with applicable laws pertaining to employment practices and employee treatment. Conditions of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act of 1973 (WISHA), and standards and regulations issued under these Acts must be complied with. STARFIRE agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the CITY from all damages assessed for STARFIRE's failure to comply with the Acts and Standards issued thereunder. STARFIRE is also responsible for meeting all pertinent local, state and federal health and environmental regulations and standards applying to any operation in the performance of this Agreement. 9.10 Nondiscrimination. PARTIES shall not discriminate in employment or services to the public on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, marital status, or disability, except for employment actions based on bona fide occupational qualification. AGREEMENT Page 27 of 31 50367676.02 9.11 Choice of Law & Venue. This Agreement shall be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Washington. Any judicial action to resolve disputes arising out of this Agreement shall be brought in King County Superior Court. 9.12 Costs & Attorneys' Fees. In any action brought to enforce any provision of this Agreement, including actions to recover sums due or for the breach of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, or for the restitution of the PREMISES to the CITY or eviction of STARFIRE during the term or after expiration thereof, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney's fees incurred, including the fees of accountants, appraisers, and other professionals, at trial or on appeal, and without resort to suit. 9.13 Modification. This Agreement may only be modified by written instrument signed by both PARTIES. 9.14 Change in Law /Renegotiation. The PARTIES agree that changes in federal, state or local laws or regulations that materially modify the terms and conditions of the Agreement and result in a detrimental change in circumstances or a material hardship for either party in performing this Agreement may be the subject of a request by a requesting party to renegotiate this Agreement or negotiate Agreement amendments and the responding party agrees to renegotiate fairly with the requesting party. 9.15 Force Majeure. Provided that all other requirements of this Agreement are met, any party shall not be deemed to be in default and shall not be liable for failure to perform under this Agreement if that party's performance is prevented or delayed by acts of God including landslides, lightning, forest fires, storms, floods, freezing and earthquakes, civil disturbances strikes or labor interference, acts of the public enemy, wars, blockades, public riots, breakage, explosions, accident to machinery, equipment or materials, unavailability of required materials, governmental restraint or other causes, whether of the kind enumerated or otherwise, which are not reasonably within the control of that obligated party ( "Force Majeure"). If as a result of a Force Majeure event, an obligated party is unable wholly or partially to meet its obligations under this Agreement, it shall give the other party promptly written notice of the Force Majeure event, describing it in reasonable detail. The obligated party's obligations under this Agreement shall be suspended, but only with respect to the particular component of obligations affected by the Force Majeure and only for the period during which the Force Majeure exists. AGREEMENT Page 28 of 31 50367676.02 9.16 Waiver. Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of that provision. No waiver of any right or obligation of either party hereto shall be effective unless in writing, specifying such waiver, executed by the party against whom such waiver is sought to be enforced. Waiver of any right or power arising out of this Agreement shall not be deemed waiver of any other right or power. 9.17 Illegal Provisions — Severability. Should any part of this Agreement be found void, illegal, or unenforceable, the balance of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 9.18 Article Headings, Gender, & Number. Article paragraph headings are not to be construed as binding provisions of this concession; they are for the convenience of the PARTIES only. The masculine, feminine, singular and plural of any word or words shall be deemed to include and refer to the gender and number appropriate in the context. 9.19 Entire Agreement. This Agreement and its Exhibits constitutes the entire agreement between the PARTIES, and the PARTIES acknowledge that there are no other agreements, written or oral, that have not been set forth in the text of this Agreement. 9.20 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 9.21 Recording. Upon the execution of this Agreement the CITY will cause this Agreement to be recorded with the land use records of King County, Washington. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into between the City of Tukwila and Starfire Sports as of the 1st day of March, 2003. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 STARFIRE SPORTS a not - for - profit Washington corporation Page 29 of 31 APPROVED AS TO FORM: City ttorney ATTEST: 4,4,(1.._. kg_ c?Le_.../.--,e_____, g_____ Christopher G. Slatt, Chairman 4 Pres CITY OF TUKWILA a Washington municipal corporation By: Clerk LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit A — Description of PREMISES Exhibit B — Preliminary Building and Site Plans Exhibit C — Starfire Sports FACILITIES Exhibit D — Legal Description of PARK AGREEMENT • 50367676.02 Page 30 of 31 Steven M. Mullet, Mayor STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that STEVEN M. MULLET is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that she signed this instrument, on oath stated that ' as authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Mayor o the CITY OF TUKWILA to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Givi`�c official , 1: 1, .6.t 74.: GCS ems. I i IZ OTARY f,1 • l' :%•°� :O�_.... �. i ii :U r i /j ., ........... i i AO ‘‘k A F(rFw • •' -1 `4`CF W�- seal this o O day o STATE OF WAISIkliNgW N ) ) ss. COUNTY OF KING ) , 2003. Type /Print Named ell) it.) /U (s ( 7 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing at _ My Commission expires On this 2O day of ...0 1- , 2004 before n r o ajl ap eared CHRISTOPHER G. SLATT, to me known tobthe CHAIRMAl\ of S AFIRE swN'`e.,.a. SPORTS, a not - for - profit Washington corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute and in fact executed said instrument on behalf of the corporation. Given under my hand and official seal this ONIS c \ \% r cot- %OTARY 3; i j : 0 g• 1 PUBUC f 2 -06..' AGREEMENT 50367676.02 day of -/.4- -t( p- 2003. 1. Type /Print Name �1 471) �iU/12/ S Notary Public in and for the State of Washington residing a My Commission expires Page 31 of 31 EXHIBIT A Description of PREMISES The PREMISES consist of the FACILITIES (as defined at Exhibit C) and exterior landscaping but does not include the fee ownership of the PARK real property (see Exhibit D) upon which the PREMISES are located, and as more particularly described as follows: THE PREMISES SHALL BE THAT PORTION OF THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT D TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND STARFIRE (EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2003, "AGREEMENT "), AS MORE PARTICULARLY SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B TO THE AGREEMENT AS THAT PROPERTY WITHIN THE DASHED LINES AND MORE GENERALLY DESCRIBED IN SAID EXHIBIT B AS "SOFTBALL COMPLEX," "STARFIRE ATHLETIC CENTER, [TOGETHER WITH] FIELDS 1,2,3 AND 4," AND " FIELDS 5,6 AND 7." CITY AND STARFIRE AGREE THAT A MORE COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE PREMISES SHALL BE DEVELOPED AND ADDED TO THIS EXHIBIT A, AS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE AGREEMENT AND UPON REQUEST BY EITHER PARTY. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Exhibit A SOFTBALL COUPLE( WJNTENANCE FACIUi1ES Exhibit 'B' - Preliminary Building & Site Plan ACCESS BRIDGE RIVER ;�� / - Pi 4� � '�r � � • y``I �• � MUT411 .IR• O UN Aw RNwEPC TAO ES NR 4 D ({r64 • ' J ti.kAppelp R.II IM NI lie Mil .......:::-....i Aw,dire191::11:111°.1) wit "11 WAIrd "`'4 1,0 00 ill iii*-1 AO • I VI, 4 I KIN.. I .1114 Ilik 1y e ••,••■• STARFIRE FACIUTY BOUNDARY / 5 GREEN LEVEE E0IST1NO ARTWORK GREEN RIVER GREEN RIVE LEVEE • • AGREEMENT 50767676.02 XISTINC ACCESS BRIDGE Exhibit B EXHIBIT C STARFIRE SPORTS FACILITIES The FACILITIES will be comprised of 13 athletics fields, consisting of an athletic center building housing two indoor soccer fields, and associated facilities, one outdoor soccer stadium field, six outdoor soccer fields, and four or more softball fields and other athletic and recreational facilities that may be developed in conjunction therewith. The FACILITIES may provide on the PREMISES for a range of field sports and community events, including but not limited to soccer, softball and baseball, rugby, lacrosse, and cricket. AGREEMENT 50367676.02 Exhibit C EXHIBIT D Legal Description of PARK Filed For Record At Request Of AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: King County Asset Management Section ADM -ES -0500 500 King County Admin. Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98104 BARGAIN AND SALE DEED Grantor - - King County, Washington Grantee - - City of Tukwila Legal - - - - SW 1/4, Sec. 13, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Govt Lots 1 & 2, Sec. 23, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Govt. Lots 1 & 5, Sec. 24, Twp 23 N., Rge 4 E., W.M. Tract 36, Second Supplement Map of Renton Shore Lands Blocks 4-9 & 12 -17, Gundaker's Interurban Addn. Tax Acct. — 1323049080, 2323049001, 2423049030 & 295490 -0426 The Grantor, KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington; for and in consideration of mutual benefits, pursuant to King County Ordinance No. 14550, does hereby bargain, sell, and convey unto the CITY OF TUKWILA, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, the following described lands, situate in King County, Washington, and referred to herein as the "Property': FORT DENT PARK Tax Account No. 132304 -9080 A tract of land in the SW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, described as follows: Commencing at the S.W. corner of said Section 13; thence N. 29 °51' W. 114.7 feet; thence N. 66 °21' E. 153.9 feet; thence S. 66 °57' E. to a point on the Easterly margin of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. right of way and the true point of beginning; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly margin of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. right of way 108 feet, more or less, to a point on the Southerly margin of Tract 33 of Renton Shorelands 2nd Supplement, records of King County, Washington; thence Easterly along said Southerly margin of Tract 33, 33 feet, more or less, to the Westerly margin of County Road No. 8 (known as Monster Road); thence Southeasterly along said Westerly margin of County Road No. 8, 104 feet, more or less, to a point which bears N.74 °13'19" E. from a point within said tract of land which is located on the Southerly margin of a permanent easement recorded under King County Auditor's File No. 7202010402 and granted to King County for the P -1 Drainage Page 1 of `- AGREEMENT 50767676.01 Exhibit D Channel, said point being described by Washington State Lambert Grid Coordinates (North Zone) N 176, 376.52, E 1, 650, 378.61; thence continuing Southeasterly along said Westerly margin of County Road No. 8 along a curve to the left having a radius of 300 feet, the center of which bears N. 25 °21'49" E., an arc distance of 50.74 feet; thence S. 74 °13'19" W. 68.84 feet; thence S. 83 °41'02" W. 60.83 feet; thence along a curve to the right having a radius of 667.96 feet, the center of which bears N.15 °46'41" W. an arc distance of 108.45 feet, more or less, to the Easterly margin of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. right of way; thence Northeasterly along said Easterly margin 24 feet, more or less, to the true point of beginning. SUBJECT TO: 1) Easement in favor of Drainage District No. 1 for flood control works, as recorded under Recording No. 4717788; 2) Pacific American Commercial Co. for ingress and egress, as recorded under Recording No. 5833513; 3) Harold R. Iverson and Marion E. Iverson, for ingress and egress, as recorded under Recording No. 5833514. Tax Account No. 232304 -9001 All of Government Lots 1 and 2 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M.; ALSO all that portion of Government Lots 1 and 5 in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., AND all that part of the Lake in Sections 23 and 24 lying West of the right of way of main lines of Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway; ALSO Tract 36, Second Supplement Map of Renton Shore Lands as shown on the official maps thereof on file in the Office of the Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington. EXCEPT right of way of Northern Pacific Railway Co.; LESS Coal & Minerals and the right to explore for and mine the same; TOGETHER WITH and subject to the terms of all easements appurtenant to the above described property; EXCEPT that certain easement granted to Pacific American Commercial Co. on the 25th day of July, 1963, by Container Corporation of America, and recorded in Volume 4616 of Deed, records of King County, at pages 668, 669 and 670, Auditor's File No. 5833513. Tax Account No. 242304 -9030 All those parts or portions of Lots 1 and 5, in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, bounded and described as follows: Beginning on the West boundary of the R/W of the Burlington Northern, Inc., formerly the Northern Pacific Railway Co., at a point which is 550 feet South and about 100 feet East of the N.W. corner of said Section 24, and running thence Southeasterly a distance of 300 feet to a point which is distant 70 feet Westerly from, measured at right angles to, said Burlington Northern, Inc. RAN boundary; thence Southeasterly parallel to and distant 70 feet Page 2 of 1--- Westerly from said R/W boundary to White River; thence Easterly along said White River to said R/W boundary; thence Northwesterly along said West boundary of Burlington Northern, Inc. R/W to point of beginning. SUBJECT TO: Restrictions and reservations contained in that certain Warranty Deed to King County, as recorded under Recording No. 7502100393. Tax Account No. 295490 -0426 That portion of vacated Blocks 4 to 9, inclusive, and vacated Blocks 12 to 17, inclusive, of Gundaker's Interurban Addition to Seattle (Vacated), according to plat recorded in Volume 14 of Plats, page 46, in King County, Washington, and vacated streets adjoining, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at Highway Engineer's Station P.O.T. (2M) 127 +75.0 on the 2M -line shown on the State Highway Map of Primary State Highway No. 1 (SR405) Green River Interchange, Sheet 2 of 4 Sheets, established by Commission Res. No. 1192, February 19, 1962; thence Northeasterly at right angles of said 2M -line North 30 °27'06" East.284.88 feet; thence tangent to the preceding course along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 300 feet and a central angle of 08 °19'06 ", an arc length of 43.56 feet; thence tangent to the preceding curve North 22 °08'00" East 309.43 feet; thence North 30 °35'15" East 60.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the parcel to be described herein; thence, from said True Point of Beginning from a tangent that bears North 59 °24'45 West along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 60.00 feet and a central angle of 89 °41'29 ", an arc length of 93.92 feet; thence, North 59 °24'45" West 183.62 feet, more or less, to the bank of the Green River; thence along the bank of the Green River North 30 °04'58" East 116.17 feet to a point thereon; thence leaving said bank of the Green River South 37 °36'40" East 137.76 feet; thence South 55 °24'30" East 50.12 feet; thence South 59 °24'45" East 66.73 feet; thence South 30 °35'15" West 1.82 feet to the True Point of Beginning. SUBJECT TO: 1) Covenant to bear the cost of construction or repair of road crossing, easement for which was granted over adjacent property by instrument, as recorded under Recording No. 5833515, 5990555 and 5990556; 2) Right of the State of Washington in and to that portion, if any, of the land described which lies below the line of ordinary high water of the Green River; 3) Any change in the boundary or legal description of the property due to any shift or change in the course of the Green River; 4) Rights and easement of the public for commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries; and 5) Restrictions on the use of the land resulting from the rights of the public or riparian owners to use any portion which is now, or has been, covered by water. TOGETHER WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED EASEMENT: Page 3 of Grantor hereby assigns all its rights, privileges and obligations, subject to the approval of such assignment by the State of Washington, in the easement granted by the State of Washington Department of Natural Resources on June 19, 1974, attached to this Deed as Exhibit A, for right of way for the construction, use and maintenance of a county road bridge upon, over and across the following described shorelands in King County, Washington, to wit: Those portions of the shorelands of the second class and bed of the Green River, owned by the State of Washington, situate in front of Government Lot 1, Section 23, and the W. H. Gilliam D. L. C. in Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., included within the limits of a strip 60 feet in width, having 30 feet of such width on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at a point in said Government Lot 1, which is N 2° 36' 20" W 459.17 feet from the east quarter section corner of said Section 23, running thence S 59° 24' 11" E 199.9 feet to a point in the W. H. Gilliam D. L. C. No. 41, which is N 22° 57' 22" E 387.65 feet from the west quarter section corner of said Section 24, and the terminal point of this centerline description, having an area of 0.18 acre, as shown on the plat thereof on file in the office of the Commissioner of Public Lands at Olympia, Washington. Subject, however, to any rights to be acquired pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 158, Session Laws of 1959. RESERVED UNTO KING COUNTY WASHINGTON, THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY: 1) Easement for drainage channel, as recorded under Recording No. 7203020421; 2) Agreement with Burlington Northern, Inc. for operation and maintenance of a flood control drainage channel, as recorded under Recording No. 7302060451; 3) Agreement with the State of Washington for maintenance of a drainage channel, as recorded under Recording No. 7305220394; 4) Aquatic Easement granted by the State of Washington, as recorded under Recording No. 8006100511; 5) Easement for drainage canal granted by Burlington Northern, Inc., as recorded under Recording No. 8002110444. RESERVED UNTO KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY: Grantor hereby reserves a permanent utility easement with the following terms: A) The County owns Utility facilities located on and under the Property. An easement for these Utility facilities had been granted to Municipality of Metropolitan Page 4 of F Seattle (hereinafter Metro) by document dated July 30, 1962, recorded under King County Recorder's number 5469169( "Metro Easements "). Since the granting of the Metro Easements, the County purchased the Property, and the County and Metro merged, thereby causing a merger of title between the Property and the Metro Easements. This Reservation of Easement shall supercede and replace the language of the Metro Easements. B) The County's agreement to convey the Property to the City is conditioned upon the County's reservation of a permanent utility easement. C) The City and County, by accepting and recording this utility easement reservation, hereby mutually covenant and agree as follows: 1) The County hereby reserves, for the purposes stated below, a permanent utility easement over, across, along, in, upon and under the Property referred to as the Utility Easement Area and more particularly described as follows: That portion of Government Lots 1 and 5, Section 24, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., and Government Lot 2, Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying within a strip of land 50 feet in width, 25 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning on the Southwesterly margin of the right of way of the Burlington Northern, Inc., formerly the Northern Pacific Railway Company, at a point which is 25 feet Northerly of, measured at right angles to, the Green River; Thence South 86 °12'08" West 25.43 feet; Thence North 34 °19'06" West 491.72 feet to Point "A "; Thence continuing North 34 °19'06" West 160.39 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 500 feet; Thence along said curve a distance of 88.39 feet through a central angle of 10 °07'44" to the beginning of a reverse curve to the left having a radius of 500 feet; Thence along said curve a distance of 85.73 feet through a central angle of 9 °49'28" to a point of tangency; Thence North 34 °00'48" West 149.71 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 500 feet; Thence along said curve a distance of 48.02 feet through a central angle of 5 °30'08" to a point of tangency; Thence North 39 °30'56" West 91.35 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 500 feet; Thence along said curve a distance of 45.35 feet through a central angle of 5 °11'50" to a point of tangency; Thence North 34 °19'06" West 739.52 feet; Thence North 79 °19'06" West 28.67 feet; Thence North 89 °41'02" West 33.97 feet; Thence South 67 °48'58" West 173.89 feet to Point "B "; Thence continuing South 67 °48'58" West 115.14 feet; Page 5 of A Thence North 67 °11'02" West 29.91 feet to a point on the centerline of the Green River Bridge projected Southerly; Thence Northerly along said projected centerline 10 feet, more or less, to the Green River, and the terminus of said line. Together with a strip of land 20 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point South 55 °40'54" West 25 feet from the above - described Point "A "; Thence South 55 °40'54" West 400 feet; Also together with a strip of land 20 feet in width, the centerline of which is described as follows: Beginning at a point South 22 °11'02" East 25 feet from the above - described Point "B "; Thence South 22 °11'02" East 40 feet 2) The Utility Easement being granted herein is for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, removing, re- constructing, repairing, replacing and using sewer pipeline, pipelines, re- claimed water lines or other transmission or conveyance lines, including but not limited to communication lines or devices and optic lines with all connections, manholes and appurtenances thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as "facilities "), within the Utility Easement Area, together with the right of ingress to and egress from said described property for the foregoing purposes. 3) The term of the utility easement shall be perpetual, and shall be appurtenant to, be binding upon, and run with the Property. 4) County shall, if the above described Property is disturbed by the maintenance, removal, repair or replacement of the facilities specified herein, restore the surface of the above described Property as nearly as possible to the condition in which it existed at the commencement of said maintenance, removal, repair or replacement. 5) County shall indemnify, defend. and hold harmless City, its elected officials, staff, officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including costs and attorneys fees in defense and costs on appeal thereof, for injuries, sickness or death of persons or damage to property, which is caused by or arises out of said County, its officers, agents, or employees' errors or omissions in the performance of activities related to this easement, provided, however, that County's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall not extend to injuries, sickness, death or damage caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of City, its elected officials, officers, agents or employees. County agrees that it's obligations under this paragraph extend to any claim, demand, and /or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any of it's employees, or agents. For this purpose, County by mutual negotiation, hereby waives as respects the City only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. Page 6 of 6) City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless County, its elected officials, staff, officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including costs and attorneys fees in defense and costs on appeal thereof, for injuries, sickness or death of persons or damage to property, which is caused by or arises out of said City, its officers, agents, or employees' acts, errors or omissions on the Property, both inside and outside the Utility Easement Area, provided, however, that City's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall not extend to injuries sickness, death or damage caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of County, its elected officials, officers, agents or employees. City agrees that it's obligations under this paragraph extend to any claim, demand, and /or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any of it's employees, or its agents. For this purpose, City, by mutual negotiation, hereby waives, as respects the County only, any immunity that would otherwise be available against such claims under the Industrial Insurance provisions of Title 51 RCW. 7) All right, title, and interest that may be used and enjoyed without interfering with the Reservation of Utility Easement rights are reserved to the City. Except as otherwise provided herein, and after the date of this agreement, the construction, installation, or maintenance of any structures, whether temporary or permanent, shall be absolutely prohibited within the above described permanent easement area and shall be deemed an unreasonable interference with County's easement rights unless specifically approved in writing by the County. Moreover, as to such non- approved structures, the provisions of paragraph 4 and 5 above, shall not apply. RESERVED UNTO KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY: Grantor hereby reserves a permanent river protection easement, which shall be a perpetual easement for the purposes of accessing and constructing, inspecting, monitoring, reconstructing, maintaining and repairing, river bank protection and /or other flood related works, including installing, inspecting and maintaining all vegetation and any other appurtenances thereto across, in, under, on, over and upon the following portions of the Property: All portions of the Property that. are riverward of a line that is parallel to and thirty (30) feet landward of the stable top of the river bank on the Green River ( "Easement Area "), as constructed or reconstructed, together with reasonable ingress and egress upon the Property to access the Easement Area. Grantor shall have the right at such time as may be necessary and at the Grantor's sole discretion, to enter upon the Property and to have unimpeded access to, in and through the Easement Area for the purposes of exercising the Grantor's rights as described herein. Grantee agrees not to plant non - native vegetation within the Easement Area and not to remove or otherwise alter any improvements installed by Grantor, including any Page 7 o- native vegetation that may be planted and any flood protection works that may be constructed, within the Easement Area, without the prior approval of Grantor. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as granting any license, permit or right, otherwise required by law, to Grantee with respect to the Property and the Easement Area. For the purposes of this river protection easement, the term "native vegetation" shall mean vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds (as identified on the State of Washington noxious weed list found at Washington Administrative Code Chapter 16 -750, as amended from time to time), which are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur at the site. Neither Grantor nor Grantee is hereby obligated to future maintenance, repair or other action related to the above - described exercise of easement rights. This river protection easement and /or any flood related works constructed or to be constructed within the Easement Area shall not be construed as granting any rights to any third person or entity, or as a guarantee of any protection from flooding or flood damage, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as waiving any immunity to liability granted to Grantor by any state statute, including Chapter 86.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, or as otherwise granted or provided for by law. The rights, conditions, and provisions of this easement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, and successors in interest and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING COVENANTS, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO BE RUNNING COVENANTS BURDENING AND BENEFITING THE PARTIES SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS: The City, as required by RCW 36.89.050, covenants that the Property shall be continued to be used for open space, park,•or recreation facility purposes or that other equivalent facilities within the County shall be conveyed to the County in exchange therefore. The City covenants that it shall abide by and enforce all terms, conditions and restrictions in King County Resolution 34571, including that the City covenants that the Property will continue to be used for the purposes contemplated by Resolution 34571, that the Property shall not be transferred or conveyed except by agreement providing that such lands shall continue to be used for the purposes contemplated by Resolution 34571, and that the Property shall not be converted to a different use unless other equivalent lands and facilities within the County or City shall be received in exchange therefore. The City acknowledges that there are outstanding bonds that were used to finance the Property and covenants that it shall not use the Property in a manner that would cause the interest on County bonds related to the Property to no longer be exempt Page 8 of f- Return Address City of Tukwila City Clerk 6200 Southcenter Blvd Tukwila, WA 98188 1111111111111100 1111111111 20090203000961 CITY OF TUKWIL EAS 46.00 PAGE001 OF 005 02/03/2009 11:57 KING COUNTY, WA EASEMENT i F MAR 1 3 2009 i DEVELOPPYENT 0 REFERENCE # GRANTOR City of Tukwila GRANTEE PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC. SHORT LEGAL Lots 1 and 2 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East. ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: 2323049001 For and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration in hand paid, CITY OF TUKWILA ( "Grantor" herein), hereby conveys and warrants to PUGET SOUND ENERGY, INC., a Washington Corporation ( "Grantee" herein), for the purposes hereinafter set forth, a nonexclusive perpetual easement over, under, along across and through the following described real property ( "Property" herein) in KING County, Washington: See Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and by this reference made a part of hereof. Except as may be otherwise set forth herein Grantee's rights shall be exercised upon that portion of the Property ( "Easement Area" herein) described as follows: AN EASEMENT AREA APPROXIMATELY 11 FEET IN WIDTH AND 23 FEET IN LENGTH LYING WITHIN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL AND AS MORE PARTICULARLY DEPICTED ON THE DRAWING MARKED EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THE REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. (FORT DENT) 1. Purpose. Grantee shall have the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair, replace, improve, remove, enlarge, and use the easement area for one or more utility systems for purposes of transmission, distribution and sale of gas and electricity. Together with the right of access over and across said Property to enable Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder. As used herein, the term "system" shall include all appurtenances and facilities as are necessary, in the judgment of Grantee, for the operation and maintenance of said systems. EXCISE TAX NOT REQUIRED King Co. Records jity 2. Grantor's Use of Easement Area. Grantor reserves the right to use the Easement Area for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights herein granted, provided, however, Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buildings, structures or other objects on the Easement Area and Grantor shall do no blasting within 300 feet of Grantee's facilities without Grantee's prior written consent. 3. Indemnity. Grantee agrees to indemnify Grantor from and against liability incurred by Grantor as a result of Grantee's negligence in the exercise of rights herein granted to Grantee, but nothing herein shall require Grantee to indemnify Grantor for that portion of any such liability attributable to the negligence of Grantor or the negligence of others. 4. Abandonment. The rights herein granted shall continue until such time as Grantee ceases to use the Easement Area for a period of five (5) successive years, in which event, this easement shall terminate and all rights hereunder, and any improvements remaining in the Easement Area, shall revert to otherwise become the property of Grantor, provided, however, that no abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred by reason of Grantee's failure to initially install its systems on the Easement Area within any period of time from the date hereof. 5. Successors and Assigns. Grantee shall have the right to assign, apportion or otherwise transfer any or all of its rights, benefits, privileges and interests arising in and under this easement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the rights and obligations of the parties shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors and assigns. DATED this CJt ��� day of GkAittf N 2009. GRANTOR: CITY OF TUKWILA Attest /Authenticated: Christy O'Flaherty, City Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. County of King On this 9 -W day of oil vLar `'j , 2009, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duty commissioned and sworn, personally appeared Jim Haggerton, known to me to be the Mayor of CITY OF TUKWILA, the municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the free and voluntary act of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written. a`''aA10i \''''' 'rl Y ```per t P�Fr tAtt sr go .LYi1L �ie•'�,� .,�w. (ft% n: Aid , • `,,, )c flit ®i' 4ld)11,,, oN \1� .'•S0' 414.. C \rtsly rl\ . ©`FLQ1,et print na , e 111 G� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at (-^ .rtA) 0 2 My appointment expires 3 "Exhibit A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION POWER EASEMENT That portion of Government Lots 1 and 2 in Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, more particularly described as follows: COMMENCING at the Northeast corner of said Section 23; THENCE South 00° 26' 12" West, 1,329.23 feet along East line of said Section 23; THENCE North 88° 42' 12" West, 108.93 to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE South 33° 33' 36" East, 23.00 feet; THENCE South 56° 26' 24" West, 23.00 feet; THENCE North 33° 33' 36" West, 21.50 feet; THENCE South 55° 07' 28" West, 9.45 feet; • THENCE North 34° 52' 32" West, 23.00 feet; THENCE North 55° 07' 28" East, 11.87 feet; THENCE North 03° 27' 28" East, 12.18 feet; THENCE South 84° 02' 16" West, 1.15 feet; THENCE North 05° 57' 44" West, 26.00 feet; THENCE North 84° 02' 16" East, 20.00 feet; THENCE South 05° 57' 44" East, 26.00 feet; THENCE South 84° 02' 16" West, 3.64 feet; THENCE South 03° 27' 28" West, 15.70 feet; THENCE South 34° 52' 32" East, 11.71 feet; THENCE North 56° 26' 24" East, 9.48 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Project Name: Starfire Sports January 27, 2009 Page 1 of 1 TSUjss 14024L.002.doc Exhibit: 14024EX01- Power.DWG \ \ill /iii.0%/ZAi IZZASMX\ \Va\\X\V , �yAC tA�O SIGNED j L7CJc% "Exhibit B" i 1°=30' NEW VAULT EXISTING VAULT / T,P.O.B. 4\ <<� r? \J-)'s P.O.C. I 14 13 23 \ 24 T23N. RO4E E -J M N N O N EXISTING VAULT N88'42'12 'W 108.93' File:P: \14000s \14024 \ survey \14024EX01— Power.dwg Dote /Time: 1/27/2009 10:58 AM TREVOR LANKTREE SCALE: HORIZONTAL 1"=30' VERTICAL N/A 18215 72ND AVENUE SOUTH KENT, WA 98032 (425)251-6222 (425)251-8782 FAX CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING, SURVEYING, ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES For: STARFIRE SPORTS JOB NUMBER 14024 14024L.002.DOC Title: POWER EASEMENT SHEET 1of1 DESIGNED 'DRAWN TSL I CHECKED ___..81? ...._ 'APPROVED XXX I DATE 1/27/09 , Form WA -5 (6/76) Commitment Face Page S� A M E R • P,' COMMITMENT- FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY First American Title Insurance Company FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, herein called the Company, for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor or the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgage of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of The policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent indorsement. This Commitment if preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six (6) months after the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by and authorized officer or agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by and authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By -Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." i*. ?a�.01t lIfs�t1�1�o \tea • R P a qy a • f• 2 ;••• • Cn SEPTEMBER 24. ; b ��i. 1938 S% t4IIFoo ■`' First American Title Insurance Company d PRESIDENT ATTEST / /_ /i 2_-1 e � SECRETARY BY COUNTERSIGNED •2-.1 AM} :A, f. N. ./ ' is • _—:- :.. First American Title Insurance Company 2101 FOURTH AVENUE, SUITE 800, SEATTLE, WA 98121 COMMERCIAL DIVISION TITLE UNIT - T2 FAX NO. (206) 615 -3000 MIKE COOPER TITLE OFFICER (206) 615 -3107 ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 YOUR NO. NONE CITY OF TUKWILA TO: JOHN L. SCOTT, INC. 4735 NORTHEAST 4TH STREET RENTON, WA 98059 ATTN: STEVE BECK SCHEDULE A 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 31, 2003 AT 7:30 A.M. 2. PROPOSED INSURED: TO BE DETERMINED PHYLLIS STRAUSSER TITLE ASSISTANT (206) 615 -3041 3. POLICY/POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT PREMIUM TAX STANDARD OWNER'S COVERAGE IN THE AMOUNT OF THE PURCHASE PRICE EXTENDED MORTGAGEE'S COVERAGE IN THE AMOUNT OF THE LOAN 4. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED ON PAGE 2 HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: CITY OF TUKWILA 5. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED IN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO. Page 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 IN SECTION 23, THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS I AND 5 IN SECTION 24, AND THAT PORTION OF THE LAKE IN SECTIONS 23 AND 24, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ALL LYING WEST OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF MAIN LINES OF CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST PAUL RAILWAY; ALSO, TRACT 36 OF SECOND SUPPLEMENT MAP OF RENTON SHORE LANDS, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL MAPS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS IN OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON; EXCEPT RIGHT OF WAY OF NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. Page 2 • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: ITEM (A) PAYMENT TO OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS OF THE FULL CONSIDERATION FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED. ITEM (B) PROPER INSTRUMENT(S) CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY. A. TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN AS EXISTING LIENS BY THE RECORDS OF ANY TAXING AUTHORITY THAT LEVIES TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS ON REAL PROPERTY OR BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. B. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS, INTERESTS, OR CLAIMS WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS BUT WHICH COULD BE ASCERTAINED BY AN INSPECTION OF SAID LAND OR BY MAKING INQUIRY OF PERSONS IN POSSESSION THEREOF. C. EASEMENTS, CLAIMS OF EASEMENT OR ENCUMBRANCES WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. D. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, OR ANY OTHER FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY WOULD DISCLOSE, AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY PUBLIC RECORDS. E. (A) UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; (B) RESERVATIONS OR EXCEPTIONS IN PATENTS OR IN ACTS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF; (C) WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER; WHETHER OR NOT THE MATTERS EXCEPTED UNDER (A), (B) OR (C) ARE SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS; (D) INDIAN TRIBAL CODES OR REGULATIONS, INDIAN TREATY OR ABORIGINAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING EASEMENTS OR EQUITABLE SERVITUDES. F. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN, FOR SERVICES, LABOR, MATERIALS OR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE THERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. G. ANY SERVICE, INSTALLATION, CONNECTION, MAINTENANCE, CONSTRUCTION; TAP OR REIMBURSEMENT CHARGES /COSTS FOR SEWER, WATER, GARBAGE OR ELECTRICITY. H. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE THE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGES THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. Page 3 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS I. GENERAL TAXES, WHICH AMOUNT CANNOT BE PAID UNTIL FEBRUARY 15,2003. YEAR: 2003 AMOUNT: $5.00 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 232304 - 9001 -02 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $0.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $0.00 (AS TO UNPLATTED PORTIONS) SAID AMOUNT REFLECTS SURFACE WATER AND CONSERVATION CHARGES ONLY. THE GENERAL REAL ESTATE TAX FOR SAID ACCOUNT IS EXEMPT. 2. GENERAL TAXES, WHICH AMOUNT CANNOT BE PAID UNTIL FEBRUARY 15, 2003. YEAR: 2003 AMOUNT: $5.00 TAX ACCOUNT NO.: 722950- 0360 -03 ASSESSED VALUE OF LAND: $0.00 ASSESSED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENT: $0.00 (AS TO LOT 36 AND OTHER PROPERTY) SAID AMOUNT REFLECTS SURFACE WATER AND CONSERVATION CHARGES ONLY. THE GENERAL REAL ESTATE TAX FOR SAID ACCOUNT IS EXEMPT. 3. LIABILITY, IF ANY, FOR PRO -RATA PORTION OF 2003 REAL PROPERTY TAXES WHICH ARE CARRIED ON THE KING COUNTY TAX ROLLS AS EXEMPT. TAX ACCOUNT NOS.: 232304 - 9001 -02 & 722950-0360-03 4. UNRECORDED LEASE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF. LESSOR: HAROLD R. IVERSON AND MARION F. IVERSON LESSEE: RIVERVIEW DAIRY DATED: UNDISCLOSED TERM:. UNDISCLOSED DISCLOSED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO.: 6071072 5. RECORDED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS INCLUDE REFERENCE TO A LAKE IN SECTIONS 23 AND 24. A LOCATABLE DESCRIPTION FOR THIS LAKE DOES NOT EXIST IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS AND WE CANNOT INSURE TITLE BASED ON THE RECORD DESCRIPTION. A PROPER LEGAL DESCRIPTION, LOCATABLE ON THE PUBLIC RECORDS, SHOULD BE PREPARED TO DESCRIBED THIS PROPERTY. WE SHOULD BE PROVIDED WITH A COPY OF THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REVIEW AND REVISION OF THIS COMMITMENT. 6. EVIDENCE OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE OFFICERS OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, A CORPORATION, TO EXECUTE THE FORTHCOMING INSTRUMENT. COPIES OF THE CURRENT ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, BY -LAWS AND CERTIFIED COPIES OF APPROPRIATE RESOLUTIONS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO CLOSING. 7. ACCORDING TO THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE, TITLE IS TO VEST IN PERSONS NOT YET REVEALED AND WHEN SO VESTED WILL THEN BE SUBJECT TO MATTERS DISCLOSED BY A SEARCH OF THE RECORDS AGAINST THEIR NAMES. Page 4 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF WAIVER OF DAMAGES: RECORDED: DECEMBER , 1902 RECORDING NO.: 248285 9. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 13, 1905 RECORDING NO.: 337820 (VOL. 424, P. 155 -156) IN FAVOR OF: FRED NELSEN, JAMES NELSEN, CHRIS JORGENSEN FOR: WATER PIPES AFFECTS: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN SAID EASEMENT IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO DETERMINE ITS EXACT LOCATION WITHIN SAID PREMISES 10. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MAY 13, 1905 RECORDING NO.: 337821 (VOL. 424, P. 156 -157) IN FAVOR OF: FRED NELSEN, JAMES NELSEN, CHRIS JORGENSEN FOR: WATER PIPES AFFECTS: A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 24 11. RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 786074, RESERVING ALL OIL, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. REFERENCE TO WHICH SHOULD BE MADE FOR THE PARTICULARS. 12. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 21, 1931 RECORDING NO.: 2657079 13. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVING: MINERALS RESERVED BY: GEORGE JORGENSEN AND ELEANOR G. JORGENSEN RECORDED: JUNE 27, 1963 RECORDING NO.: 5602116 NOTE: NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE REGARDING THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID RESERVED RIGHTS. 14. RESERVATIONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 5656989, RESERVING ALL OIL, GASES, COAL, ORES, MINERALS, FOSSILS, ETC., AND THE RIGHT OF ENTRY FOR OPENING, DEVELOPING AND WORKING THE SAME. REFERENCE TO WHICH SHOULD BE MADE FOR THE PARTICULARS. Page 5 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 15. ROAD MAINTENANCE PROVISIONS, AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: JANUARY 18, 1965 RECORDING NO(S).: 5833515 16. TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND /OR PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN AN EASEMENT SERVING SAID PREMISES, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 18, 1966 RECORDING NO.: 5990555 17. TERMS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND /OR PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN AN EASEMENT SERVING SAID PREMISES, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 18, 1966 RECORDING NO.: 5990556 18. EASEMENT, INCLUDING TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: RECORDED: MARCH 2, 1972 RECORDING NO.: 7203020421 IN FAVOR OF: COUNTY OF KING FOR: DRAINAGE CHANNEL AFFECTS: LOT 36 AND GOVERNMENT LOT 2 19. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 6, 1973 RECORDING NO.: 7302060451 20. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DAMAGE AND PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE: RECORDED: MAY 22, 1973 RECORDING NO.: 7305220394 21. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AGREEMENT: RECORDED: FEBRUARY 11, 1980 RECORDING NO.: 8002110444 22. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF DAMAGE AND PROTECTION FROM DAMAGE: RECORDED: JUNE 10, 1980 RECORDING NO.: 8006100511 23. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND /OR EASEMENTS: RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 2003 RECORDING NO(S).: 20030106000779 24. RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS, INCLUDING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RESERVING: MINERALS RESERVED BY: KING COUNTY RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 2003 RECORDING NO.: 20030106000779 Page 6 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 NOTE: NO DETERMINATION HAS BEEN MADE REGARDING THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF SAID RESERVED RIGHTS. 25. RIVER PROTECTION EASEMENT AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY OVER AND UPON SAID PROPERTY TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A RIVER BANK PROTECTION AND /OR OTHER FLOOD CONTROL WORKS, INCLUDING RIGHT OF ACCESS OVER AND ADJOINING THE LANDS: GRANTED TO: KING COUNTY RECORDED: JANUARY 6, 2003 RECORDING NO.: 20030106000779 (AFFECTS PORTIONS ADJACENT TO GREEN RIVER) 26. EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: 27. EASEMENT, INCLUDING RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: IN FAVOR OF: FOR: AFFECTS: TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JANUARY 6, 2003 20030106000779 KING COUNTY UTILITIES REFER TO SAID INSTRUMENT FOR THE EXACT LOCATION TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN: JANUARY 6, 2003 20030106000779 KING COUNTY DRAINAGE EASEMENTS RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NOS. 7203020421, 7302060451, 7305220394, 8006100511 AND 8002110444 28. ANY QUESTION THAT MAY ARISE DUE TO THE SHIFTING AND /OR CHANGING IN THE COURSE OF THE GREEN RIVER. 29. RIGHT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE GREEN RIVER. 30. RIGHT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND TO THAT PORTION, IF ANY, OF THE PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED WHICH LIES BELOW THE LINE OF ORDINARY HIGH WATER OF THE UNNAMED LAKE. Page 7 SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 31. RIGHTS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO THE UNRESTRICTED USE OF ALL THE WATERS OF A NAVIGABLE BODY OF WATER NOT ONLY FOR THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF NAVIGATION, BUT ALSO FOR COROLLARY PURPOSES; INCLUDING (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) FISHING, BOATING, BATHING, SWIMMING, WATER SKIING AND OTHER RELATED RECREATIONAL PURPOSES, AS THOSE WATERS MAY AFFECT THE TIDELANDS, SHORELANDS OR ADJOINING UPLANDS AND WHETHER THE LEVEL OF THE WATER HAS BEEN RAISED NATURALLY OR ARTIFICIALLY TO A MAINTAINED OR FLUCTUATING LEVEL, ALL AS FURTHER DEFINED BY THE DECISIONAL LAW OF THIS STATE. (AFFECTS ALL OF THE PREMISES SUBJECT TO SUCH SUBMERGENCE) 32. LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON THAT THERE APPEARS TO EXIST NO INSURABLE RIGHT OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED TO A PUBLIC RIGHT - OF -WAY. UNLESS THIS MATTER IS SOLVED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY, THE FORTHCOMING POLICY/ENDORSEMENT WILL CONTAIN AN EXCEPTION TO COVERAGE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF LACK OF A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE LAND. NOTE #1: THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION FOR TITLE INSURANCE HAS BEEN. MODIFIED AS SET FORTH HEREIN TO COMPLY WITH THE RECORD AND PRESUMED INTENTION OF THE PARTIES TO THE TRANSACTION. SAID DESCRIPTION SHOULD BE EXAMINED AND APPROVED BY SAID PARTIES PRIOR . TO CLOSING. INFORMATIONAL NOTES: EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1997, AND PURSUANT TO AMENDMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE STATUTES RELATING TO STANDARDIZATION OF RECORDED DOCUMENTS, THE FOLLOWING FORMAT AND CONTENT REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF THE DOCUMENT BY THE RECORDER. ANY SKETCH ATTACHED HERETO IS DONE SO AS A COURTESY ONLY AND IS NOT PART OF ANY TITLE COMMITMENT OR POLICY. IT IS FURNISHED SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING IN LOCATING THE PREMISES AND FIRST AMERICAN EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY WHICH MAY RESULT FROM RELIANCE MADE UPON IT. THE DESCRIPTION CAN BE ABBREVIATED AS SUGGESTED BELOW IF NECESSARY TO MEET STANDARDIZATION REQUIREMENTS. THE FULL TEXT OF THE DESCRIPTION MUST APPEAR IN THE DOCUMENT(S) TO BE INSURED. TRACT 36, SECOND SUPPLEMENT MAP OF RENTON SHORE LANDS & TOWNSHIP 23N RANGE 4E GOVT LOTS 1 -2 SECTION 23 GOVT LOTS 1 & 5 SECTION 24 TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S): 232304 - 9001 -02 & 722950- 0360 -03 Page 8 • • SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 CONT. ORDER NO. 14001T -T2 A FEE WILL BE CHARGED UPON THE CANCELLATION OF THIS COMMITMENT PURSUANT TO THE WASHINGTON STATE INSURANCE CODE AND THE FILED RATE SCHEDULE OF THE COMPANY. LL/EJH CC: BRUCE DEES & ASSOCIATES 222 EAST 26TH STREET SUITE 202 TACOMA, WA 98421 END OF SCHEDULE B Page 9 • NOTICE This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American Title Insurance Company and it is NOT a part of any title commitment or policy of title insurance. This Sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, roads, or easements affecting the property. No reliance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. • ORDER NO. 1(10 0 I SUBDIVISION REC NO.NOL. &PG. QTR ,Vf SEC )3 TWP 2-3 RNG KING COUNTY DEPT. of ASSESSMENTS NE 23 -23 -04 IL son Seale t1200 t1' - 1007 Monad eapmem 17,2001 • • NOTICE This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American Title Insurance Cony and it is NOT a part of any title commitment or policy of title insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways, roads, or easements affecting the property. No reliance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. . KING COUNTY DEPT. OF ASSESSMENTS �` NNW AMR. IR worms ANA IA OW AMOY= 1.11Al...711 A. - .... \—\ "1,}...).A.:.. E ORDER N• / qob/ % SUBDIVISION RCDG NO./VOL & P OTR X& SEC 2• TWNSHP 2 RUG SW 13-23 -4 Oa WI •;t KC 1973 NW 24 -23 -4 SCALE 1••I0o ,4e000 AMANINGTON TECHNICAL CENTEN a ,z A �I • NE 23 -23.4 ■ \ -- „� - SW 24-23-4 ■ 484 ✓� 14,10, ,ti' s ti...u..► • NOTICE This Sketch is furnished as a courtesy only by First American Title Insurance Company and it is NOT a part of any tide commitment or policy of tide insurance. This sketch is furnished solely for the purpose of assisting in locating the premises and does not purport to show all highways. roads, or easements affecting the property. No reliance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. E ORDER NO. //DD T SUBDIVISION J' . ss.p RCDG NO./VOL. & PG. QTR -r0 SEC TNNSHP RNG First American Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT Conditions and Stipulations The term "mortgage" when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument.If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of an defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate of interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the Insuring provisions, exclusion from coverage, and the Conditions and Stipulations of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by references and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to the provisions and conditions and stipulations of this Commitment. 4 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY PRIVACY POLICY We Are Committed to Safeguarding Customer Information In order to better serve your needs now and in the future, we may ask you to provide us with certain information. We understand that you may be concerned about what we will do with such information -- particularly any personal or financial information. We agree that you have a right to know how we will utilize the personal information you provide to us. Therefore, we have adopted this Privacy Policy to govern the use and handling of your personal information. Applicability This Privacy Policy governs our use of the information which you provide to us. It does not govern the manner in which we may use the information we have obtained from any other source, such as information obtained from a public record or from another person or entity. Types of Information Depending upon which of our services you are utilizing, the types of nonpublic personal information that we may collect include: Information we receive from you on applications, forms and in other communications to us, whether in writing, in person, by telephone or any other means; Information about your transactions with us, our affiliated companies, or others; and Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency. Use of Information We request information from you for our own legitimate business purposes and not for the benefit of any nonaffiliated party. Therefore, we will not release your information to nonaffiliated parties except: (I) as necessary for us to provide the product or service you have requested of us; or (2) as permitted by law. We may, however, store such information indefinitely, including the period after which any customer relationship has ceased. Such information may be used for any internal purpose, such as quality control efforts or customer analysis. We may also provide all of the types of nonpublic personal information listed above to one or more of our affiliated companies. Such affiliated companies include financial service providers, such as title insurers, property and casualty insurers, and trust and investment advisory companies, or companies involved in real estate services, such as appraisal companies, home warranty companies and escrow companies. Furthermore, we may also provide all the information we collect, as described above, to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, on behalf of our affiliated companies, or to other financial institutions with whom we or our affiliated companies have joint marketing agreements. Former Customers Even if you are no longer our customer, our Privacy Policy will continue to apply to you. Confidentiality and Security We will use our best efforts to ensure that no unauthorized parties have access to any of your information. We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those individuals and entities who need to know that information to provide products or services to you. We will use our best efforts to train and oversee our employees and agents to ensure that your information will be handled responsibly and in accordance with this Privacy Policy. We currently maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. An electronic version of this form is also available from the Department of Community Development. Applicant Responses: A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Starfire Sports Complex at Tukwila 2. Name of Applicant: Starfire Sports 3. Date checklist prepared: February 21, 2003 4. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila 5. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): While this project is not phased, for the purposes of SEPA, the applicant is constructing the project in the following stages: Stage I- Renovate 1 field, construct 3 fields. Stage II- Athletic Center, Restroom & concession Buildings. Stage III- Renovate 3 fields. 6. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 7. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Attached are: 1. Traffic Study dated February 4, 2003 prepared by Entranco, Inc. 2. Geotechnical Study -Report dated February 15, 2003 prepared by: Bergquist Engineering Services. 3. Storm Water Summary Report dated February 20, 2003. Agency Comments PECEIVID crrY OF TUKWILA MAY 1 2043 PERMIT CENYEA • • 8. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. • • Construction will be limited to the south half (approximately 25 acres) of the existing Fort Dent Park located adjacent to the Green River, east of Interurban Avenue and north of Fort Dent Boulevard in the City of Tukwila. 12. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? None of the development in this proposal affects any sensitive areas as designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth Agency Comments a. General descris '•n of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other Existing areas proposed for soccer field improvements are generally flat. ransition areas outside the fields gently slope to existing grades. An earth berm supports an existing concrete seating complex. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? An artificial berm with a 50% slope forms the back of the existing grandstand at the existing soccer stadium field. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Existing on -site soils are Sandy Silt. See attached Geotechnical Report by Bergquist Engineering Services dated February 15, 2003 d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No surface indications of unstable soils are visible in the immediate vicinity. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Clean, structural fill will be imported for construction of the building foundation. Site earthwork will be minimal to prepare the existing flat areas for athletic field improvements. Quantitiy:_ Cut - approximately 11,000 CY Fill — approximately 11,000 CY f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. The applicant will comply with applicable City of Tukwila Best Management Practices for Erosion Control. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 3. Water a. Surface: 1. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The site is adjacent to the Green River. Currently all on -site stormwater is collected and piped to a stormwater detention pond. Water is detained in the pond until the water level reaches elevation 7.82. At that point, it then flows by gravity to an outlet at the - river. During a significant storm event, when the river level is higher than the storm outlet, water from the pond is pumped to the river via an existing stormwater lift station. Proposed plans are to collect storm water and pipe to the existing system. The existing system will receive minor modifications to collect stormwater from the new improvements. 2. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Some earthwork associated with construction of the new soccer fields will occur within 200' of the river; however, there will be no direct runoff to the river and no disturbance of the existing vegetation. All work will be on the park side of the existing dike (away from the river). 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No fill or dredge material will be placed in or removed from the Green River. The project will improve the existing storm water basin through removal of sediments. 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. There will be no withdrawal or diversion of surface water associated with the on -site stormwater pond. 5. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Yes, all but a small portion of the site lies within the 100 -year floodplain. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No waste materials will be discharged to surface waters. b. Ground: 1. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No groundwater will be withdrawn and no water will be discharged to groundwater. 2. Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve: No waste materials will be discharged into the groundwater. The new building sanitary sewer will be connected to the existing on -site sanitary sewer, which is pumped to the Renton Sewage Treatment Plant to the southeast via an existing on -site lift station. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): I. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. All on -site water in the vicinity of the improvements flows to an existing on -site stormwater detention pond. The new improvements will utilize the existing on- site storm sewer system with minor revisions for collecting runoff from the new facilities. 2. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: The new soccer fields will be constructed using synthetic turf which will significantly minimize fertilizer use from the existing natural turf fields. The synthetic turf fields will include a 6" thick minimum porous rock base under the turf. The porous rock will, in effect, serve as a storage reservoir and settling area for the stormwater prior to its entering the existing stormwater system and detention pond. All new catch basins will be equipped with elbows which act as oil / water • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other Shrubs X Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other Other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Existing grass in the vicinity of the improvements will be stripped. Stripped sod will be recycled for on -site use as much as practical. The entire existing proposed improvement area was graded and planted in 1975 -1976. There is no significant native vegetation within the proposed improvement area. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: There is some volunteer willow near the existing detention pond. All other trees were nursery grown stock planted in the mid 1970s. Any tress affected by new construction in the vicinity of the pond will be transplanted. • • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: Mammals Fish Other aw eron ea e ongbird . other • sprey Deer, bear, el .other: ' odents & River Otter Bass, salmon trout herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Chinook salmon migrate past the site as juveniles and adults. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Yes. The site is part of two migration corridors. The river provides a migratory pathway for salmonoids and this area is within the Pacific Flyway for migratory bird species. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Natural occurring vegetation along the river will not be disturbed. Any existing trees associated with the storm water detention pond that may be affected by improvements will be replaced by similar trees in the area near the pond. Fertilizer, pesticide and herbicide use will decrease significantly with the installation of synthetic turf on the fields west of the parking area. Minor pesticide, herbicide and fertilizer use will occur in peripheral planting areas and at the Athletic Center entry. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric or gas energy will be utilized for building heat. Currently, reclaimed water is used for irrigation. Water consumption as a whole will be greatly reduced with the development of synthetic turf fields. • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Through the development of synthetic turf fields, the use of water for irrigation will be significantly reduced. The building is designed to maximize use of natural light. The indoor soccer field portion of the building will be partially heated only. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. All proposed athletic fields will receive synthetic turf. Fertilizer, pesticide and herbicide use will decrease significantly with the installation of synthetic turf on the fields west of the parking area. Minor pesticide, herbicide and fertilizer use will occur in peripheral planting areas and at the Athletic Center entry 1. Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: With the development of synthetic turf fields, the use of fertilizers on the existing lawn areas will be eliminated, therefore, water quality entering the detention pond and ultimately the river, will be dramatically improved. Runoff from the existing sand soccer field which probably contains silt, will be eliminated, as that field will also be converted to synthetic turf. b. Noise 1. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is bordered on the east by railroad tracks. The facility has been utilized as a regional park for field games since the mid 1970's. The project will not increase noise levels, but will potentially increase the number of noise generating activities. However, there are no receptors to hear the noise generated. 4." • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 2. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. There will be short-term construction noise primarily during construction of the building. Use of the site will not increase on site noise from existing levels. 3. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Short-term construction noise will be minimal. Earthwork will be limited and building construction will utilize mostly prefabricated and metal structures, which are quickly assembled. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Current use of the site is as a regional park primarily for soccer and softball. Adjacent properties to the west, south and east are business related. Immediately to the east are railroad tracks. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The site was originally used for agriculture prior to construction of the original park in the mid 70's. The site has not been used for agriculture since that time. c. Describe any structures on the site. The site will consist of a new 74,517 sf building which will include two indoor soccer fields and associated support facilities. A separate 1,460 sf concession/restroom building and attached 1,400 sf maintenance equipment storage building are also proposed. The existing stadium grandstand will have a cover installed as well. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No existing structures will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Current zoning classification is LDR with public recreation overlay. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Current comprehensive plan designation is LDR with public recreation overlay. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Current shoreline master program designation is Urban. J• Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. No. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The number of people working at the completed project may range between 10 and 20 depending on the activities at any particular time. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? No one will be displaced as a result of the completed project. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: N/A 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The proposed plan will greatly enhance the function and usability of the site by development of synthetic turf fields, which will increase the playability for all users. As a recreational complex, the proposed improvements by their nature, are very compatible. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing? N/A b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. N/A • Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The main building will be 30 -35 feet tall when seen from the existing parking lot. The height of the building, when seen from within the project is not intended to exceed 65 feet and may be less depending on design decisions. The principal exterior materials will be steel, concrete masonry units (split face or ground face), with metal siding and roofing. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The site is located in a low area with surrounding properties at a generally higher elevation that the site. Also, existing trees within the park exceed the proposed building height and provide screening of the structure. These two factors reduce the visual impact of the project on surrounding properties. There are no significant views from the park due to the existing trees within the park and along the river; therefore, there are no views to be obstructed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: The aesthetics of the park will be greatly enhanced by the new improvements. Portions of the site have been left fallow since the mid 70's and have served as an on -site refuse disposal area by Park Department. The building will be reduced in size around the perimeter and will be articulated to provide a more human scale. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Currently, one soccer field is lighted. The six additional soccer fields as staged, will also be lighted with state -of -the art floodlights. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. New floodlights will be equipped with cutoff fixtures to avoid off site glare. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: New floodlights will be equipped with shielded fixtures to reduce off site glare. The existing floodlight fixtures will be replaced over time with more energy efficient and. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The existing park is a regional athletic facility; however, the entire park was recently closed by King County. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The proposed improvements will greatly enhance recreational opportunities for the entire region, since the currently closed facility will be reopened to the public and new soccer fields provided. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Recreational opportunities will be greatly enhanced by virtue of the new development, increasing the opportunities for all ages and gender. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, National, State, or Local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The far north end of the site was the site of a military outpost in the late 1800's. The site is named after the then "Fort Dent ". Vandals have since destroyed a plaque commemorating the site. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. There is no evidence of historic, scientific, or cultural importance remaining. The entire site within the constructed dike was modified during the early part of the century when the site was in cultivation and entire site graded to its current form in the mid 1970's when the park was developed. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: There will be no changes to the peripheral areas or the existing Green River levee. There will be no construction associated with the north end of the site where the original Fort Dent existed. If any historic or cultural resources are encountered during construction or installation of improvements, work will be halted in the area and a state - approved archaeologist/historian would be engaged to investigate, evaluate and/or move or curate such resources, as appropriate. S Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: Agency Comments 14. Transportation - a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Regional access to the site is via I -405 to the south. Local access is via Interurban Avenue on the West. Direct access is via Fort Dent Boulevard from Interurban. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is•the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Public transit exists along Interurban Avenue. Walking distance from the existing transit stop to the site via existing sidewalks is approximately 'V4 mile. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Fort Dent Park currently has paved and striped parking spaces for approximately 450 cars. Two stalls will be converted for emergency vehicle access. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project will not require new roads or streets or improvements to the existing roads or streets, other than the minor modification within the park to accommodate a drop off area adjacent to the new building and revised parking lot entry for safety. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The project will generate approximately 500 (winter) to 1,900 (summer) vehicle trips per day. The project will generate approximately 250 net new vehicle trips in the PM peak hour, compared to prior uses at Fort Dent Park. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The Traffic and Parking Study prepared for the project indicates that project traffic will not violate City standards for concurrency. The proponents will contribute, if required by City ordinances, to any programmed improvements impacted by project trips, within the terms of their lease agreement with the City. There may occasionally be events that will require additional parking and/or parking management, and the proponent will implement the options identified in the report as needed to mitigate • parking impacts. Please respond to all questions. Use separate sheets as necessary. Applicant Responses: 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No increased need for protection facilities. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Agency Comments The new building structure will include fire prevention materials as required by code. Police protection may actually be reduced due to the full time presence of persons of authority at the developed facility. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: natural gas system other: efuse servic- telephon anitary sewer septic b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. The proposed improvements will utilize existing on site utilities and services. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on the to ma- its decision. Signature: „4, Date Submitted: CITY OF TUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431 -3670 FAX (206) 431 -3665 E -mail: tukplan @ci.tukwila.wa.us • SHORELINE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR STAFF USE ONLY Sierra Type: P -SHORE Planner: File Number: L• j 3- 0 1 1 Application Complete (Date: ) Project File Number: Application Incomplete (Date: ) Other File Numbers: J 3- 04.-3 NAME OF PROJECT /DEVELOPMENT: 51ARPIge SFORT5 COMPLEX ,c , TuK(Vu(•,J. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Give street address or, if vacant, indicate lot(s), block and subdivision, access street, and nearest intersection. LIST ALL 10 DIGIT PARCEL NUMBERS. fixer L�1ur Pa2K. Quarter: Be Section: Z* Township: Range: (This information may be found on your tax statement.) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR : The individual who: • has decision making authority on behalf of the applicant in meetings with City staff, • has full responsibility for identifying and satisfying all relevant and sometimes overlapping development standards, and • is the primary contact with the City, to whom all notices and reports will be sent. Name: Address: Phone: (M) o 7. 7847 Signature: a2. MAMA, (DA gS421 FAX: ("2#s) 6027•&&6' 1 r• \Ihnm.nnn.\,nkwila \MManna \.CNOR I.MF. nor OR /1I /1111 Date: Philips Lighting i Proprietary ao Musco Ligh ling 1500 Watt Metal Halide Lamp Technical Data Sheet Ordering Information Ordering Code ANSI Designation Product Number Description Package Quantity Physical Characteristics Bulb Size Bulb Finish Base Maximum Overall Length (MOL) Light Center Length (LCL) Arc Tube Lighted Length Arc Tube Material Operating Position Maximum Permissible Bulb Temperature Maximum Permissible Base Temperature Maximum Bulb Base Eccentricity Arc Tube Axis to Base Axis Operating Characteristics Photometric Rated Initial Lumens (1) Mean Lumens,Approximate (2) Rated Average Life,Hours Vertical Correlated Color Temperature (Approx.)(2) CIE Chromaticity (Approx.)(2) Color Rendering Index (Ra) MH 1500/MZ 302463 Metal Halide 6 BT -56 Clear Mogul Screw Position Oriented 15 IT (391 mm) 9 1/8' (232mm) 3 5/16' (84rnm) Fused Silica Base Up (30° Below Horizontal +/- 30° 400° C (752° F) 210° C (410° F) 3° 30 ° +/ -3° 155,000 (103 Ipw) 142,000 (94.7 Ipw) 3,000 3700K x -.396; y -.390 65 Philips Lighting PHILIPS PHILIPS • Beam Control Fixtures ✓ Musco's patented reflector system redirects spill light onto the field ✓ Provides control of wasted spill and glare, reducing nearby neighborhood concerns Sportcluster8 -2 reflector system harnesses wasted spill light and uses it to improve light levels on the field. Comparative Isocandela Curves Average of right & left sides Wasted spill light is harnessed into the bottom of the beam resulting in more light on the playing surface 0 5 10 15 20 O 50 05 10 4 50 0 5 10 15 20 25 00 S 10 45 50 45 '5 25 20 -00 -15 -50 EmC Pr Mg' J� 5 •aa•iu urns 5 10 15 25 25 20 75 40 45 50 Standard symmetrical reflector Original Sportscluster ITL Report #ITL34086 Nema Type 4 29940 (= 10% MAX) 284000 106000 -15 29940 (= 10% MAX) m 1997 Musco Sports Lighting, Inc. VSGC2 40 25 20 15 10 a -25 25 30 35 10 40 50 Sportscluster -2 ITL Report #ITL35566 Nema Type 4 35000 (= 10% MAX) 327000 123000 35000 (= 10% MAX) Trespass Light Control Standard symmetrical reflector Musco's Sportsclustere -2 5 0 5 20 25 30 05 40 45 Sportscluster -2 Leve 8 ITL Report #ITL35567 Nema Type 4 35710 (= 10% MAX) Light - Structure System' is protected by one or more of the followin& U.S. patents: 4190881; 4374407; 4450507; 4725934; 4729077; 4816974; 4947303; 4994718; 5016150; 5075828; 5134557; 5161883; 5211473; 5229681; 5337221; 5343374; 5377611; 5398478; 5402327; 5519590; D337168; D353797; D353911. Canada Patents: 70479; 74939; 1114798; 1181380; 2009749. Mexico Patent: 175863. Other patents pending. • Lighting Sportscluster8- 2 reflector system redirects wasted spill light back onto the playing surface Original Sportscluster Sportsclustere -2 Sportsclustere -2 with Level -8'" option Photos of comparative beams projected on a grid ceiling for reference 0000 muso D. We Make It Happen:" 8001825 -6030 www.musco.com e -mail: lighting@musco.com 0 0.000 1099 Mums Sports Uplghro, Inn. riS C ", m m B: aL , • < ro -5 n- 2 3> x Q- C) Q D r0 Q < Q E ro in 4 MATE: BY: R.L REVISION& C (0 -5 cf n- Q D X_ Q Viiii 4 MATE: BY: R.L REVISION& C (0 -5 cf n- Q D X_ Q 'RI iii 0.‘apu0� 0 -H 7 ' V -0 < (0 r0 4 co Joq.aaidae{ ooz "°z • .t CV- • F ir1g oo 1 tl m • a DATE: BY: R.L REVISIONS: 0 -5 (n Q D X Q C-) Q Q Q rDC C 11 3 F n TJ ro .Aoq Dald-ael • • qGj p o Ul C1 Ul Ul U 0 00 , 02 o 0 0 Jti� �2 r) I Pli\I\ a� a� ° wO �o w o, ro ° .0 J O o O O p O / /O O ) J A p o�1 q) -12A A a /3 C) p Q Q 3 Q 3 Q Q S 3 3 3 Q N i N Q. Q rp Q A N N r p S� 5 Q Q z 0 DATE: T BY: R.L REVISE EQUIPMENT LISTING Pole count Pole location Mounting height Pole size Elev. Fixt /unit (Glow /unit 1 S1 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 2 S2 -S3 85' 85' 0' 8 12.8 5 S4 -S8 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 1 S9 80' 80' 0' 18 28.8 2 S10 -S11 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 1 S12 90' 90' 0' 16 25.6 2 S13 -S14 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 2 S15 -S16 70' . 70' 0' 10 15.47 2 S17 -S18 70' 70' ! 0' 11 16.54 2 S19 -S20 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S22 -S23 60' 60' 0' 9 13.34 2 S24 -S25 60' 60' : 0' 7 11.2 2 S26 -S27 60' 60' 0' 13.34 2 S28 -S29 70' 70' 0' 8 12.8 2 S30 -S31 70' 70' 0' 10 14.94 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.13 0197 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.28 0.27 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0:20 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.13 05 05 06 06 06 TUKWILA, WA FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLEP S19I 7 5 07 C088 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 S121 616.6' S201 S13 c0 S24 742.9' 6,16.9' S10 I W37.5' S1 912.1' 196.1 I S14 7 1 }180.1 I S4 it N S28 I 0.11 S29 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.07 911.2' S17 337.5' i 938.1' 20 0.3)340.225 0.21 0. 0 0.21 0.23 # aj 174.6 S7 I 60.0' 60.0 *..I S6 180.1, I S5 0. %24 .27 .30 .29 .24 0.1 0.15 •.16 0.0 0•1 0.07 0.09 cP'11 0.05 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point ®, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 • 0.04 - 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 • 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.14 • 0.15 0.15 • 0.15 0.15 - 0.16 - 0.16 • 0.15 0.14 • 0.12 • 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 • 0.04 0.03 • 0.03 ■ 0.03 .02 Fixture Type: Lamp Type: Lumens: File # / Date: Prepared By: LV -8 MZ 1500W MZ/1000W MZ 155000/105000 101927 / 11- Feb -2003 C Hoy 0000 muscD. GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE INITIAL SPILL LIGHT HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: Average: Maximum: Minimum: Avg /Min: Max/Min: 131 0.14 0.34 0.02 6.015 14.993 Number of Luminaires: 276 * KW Consumption: 432.06 * *Average Tilt Factor: 0.950 ** *Recoverable Light Loss Factors: x 1.000 Total Light Loss Factor(LLF) 0.950 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing. ** Additional non- recoverable Light Loss Factors are design constants equal to 1.0 at maintained illumination levels. * ** Includes Luminaire Dirt Depreciation and Lamp Lumen Depreciation - per IESNA Lighting Handbook 9th Edition, page 9 -17. NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume + -3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3 feet of design locations. COPYRIGHT (C) 1987,2003 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writ- ten consent of Musco Sports Lighting. = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 180 360 EQUIPMENT LISTING Pole count Pole location Mounting height Pole size Elev. Fixt. /unit Kilow /unit 1 Si 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 2 S2 -S3 85' 85' 0' 8 12.8 5 S4 -S8 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 1 S9 80' 80' 0' 18 28.8 2 S10 -S11 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 1 Si2 90' 90' 0' 16 25.6 2 S13 -S14 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 2 S15 -S16 70' 70' 0' 10 15.47 2 S17-S18 70' 70' 0' 11 16.54 2 S19 -S20 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S22 -S23 60' 60' 0' 9 13.34 2 S24 -S25 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S26 -S27 60' 60' 0' 9 13.34 2 S28 -S29 70' 70' 0' 8 12.8 2 S30 -S31 70' 70' 0' 10 14.94 0.43 0.49 0.59 0.69 0.76 0.90 11. 47 1.22 1.23 1.30 1.42 1.50 1.56 1.54 1.60 1.56 11.E 1.41 1.33 1.22 1.14 1.08 1.05 0.98 0.92 0.80 0.70 0.71 0.63 0.57 0.50 0.38 41 .47 49 49 50 52 TUKWILA, WA FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLE. 56 S 94 7 5' 616.6' 0683 0.69 0.75 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.87 0.85 0.83 0.79 0.73 0.67 0.60 0.53 S12 I 14 .T -1 I S13 742.9' S10 I S18 437.5' S1 912.1' 911.2' S171 337.5' S29 938.1' .92 1.311351.4 16 1.12 1.19 1. 174.6 `'7 I 60.0' 60.0' I S6 18u I S5 1.51 1.631,65 .18 .18 .04 1.1 0.9 0.76 0.78 0.48 0.55 0.62163 0.42 0 0.7 0.6 0.5 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point ®. 0.4 0.3 0..31 • 0.47 0.51 0.57 0.63 0.69 • 0.74 0.81 0.88 0.92 • 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.93 • 0.94 • 0.93 • 0.88 0.83 0.77 0.70 • 0.63 ■ 0.58 0.52 0.48 ■ 0.44 0.40 0.37 • 0.34 Fixture Type: Lamp Type: Lumens: File # / Date: Prepared By: MZ 1500W MZ/1000W MZ 155000/105000 101927 / 11- Feb -2003 C Hoy 0000 muscD. GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE INITIAL SPILL LIGHT MAXIMUM FOOTCANDLES Target Points: Average: Maximum: Minimum: Avg /Min: Max/Min: 131 0.87 1.65 0.31 2.755 5.252 Number of Luminaires: 276 * KW Consumption: 432.06 * *Average Tilt Factor: 0.950 ** *Recoverable Light Loss Factors: x 1.000 Total Light Loss Factor(LLF) 0.950 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing. ** Additional non- recoverable Light Loss Factors are design constants equal to 1.0 at maintained illumination levels. * ** Includes Luminaire Dirt Depreciation and Lamp Lumen Depreciation - per IESNA Lighting Handbook 9th Edition, page 9 -17. NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume + -3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3 feet of design locations. COPYRIGHT (C) 1987,2003 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writ- ten consent of Musco Sports Lighting. + = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 180 360 EQUIPMENT LISTING Pole count Pole location Mounting height Pole size Elev. Fxt. /unit 'Glow /unit 1 SI 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 2 S2 -S3 85' 85' 0' 8 12.8 5 S4 -S8 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 1 S9 80' 80' 0' 18 28.8 2 S10 -S11 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 1 S12 90' 90' 0' 16 25.6 2 S13 -S14 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 2 S15 -S16 70' . 70' 0' 10 15.47 2 S17 -S18 70' 70' 0' 11 16.54 2 S19 -S20 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S22 -S23 60' 60' 0' 9 13.34 2 S24 -S25 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S26 -S27 60' 60' 0' 9 13.34 2 S28 -S29 70' 70' 0' 8 12.8 2 S30 -531 70' 70' 0' 10 14.94 0.23 0.22 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.21 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.07 O. 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.28 0.27 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.13 7 0.03 04 05 05 06 06 06. TUKWILA, WA FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLEX S19 .07 0388 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.98 0.07 0.06 0.05 616.6' S20 i S24 742.9' 912.1' 4- S28 911.2' N 14 j X41 174.6'S7 60.0' 60.0' I S6 1801' I S5 S29 0.91340.282 0.21 0.20 0.21 0.23 938.1' .20 0.21).24 0.22 27 .30 .29 24 0.1 0.1 0.15 1.16 0.0 0.0 0.07 0.09 0• 0.05 10109.11 0.0 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point ©, 0.0 0.0 0 • 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 ■ 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 • 0.03 • 0.03 .02 Fixture Type: Lamp Type: Lumens: File # / Date: Prepared By: LV -8 MZ 1500W MZ/1000W MZ 155000/105000 101927 / 11- Feb -2003 C Hoy C000 mUSCD. GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE INITIAL SPILL LIGHT HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Target Points: Average: Maximum: Minimum: Avg /Min: Max/Min: 131 0.14 0.34 0.02 6.015 14.993 Number of Luminaires: 276 * KW Consumption: 432.06 * *Average Tilt Factor: 0.950 ** *Recoverable Light Loss Factors: x 1.000 Total Light Loss Factor(LLF) 0.950 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing. ** Additional non - recoverable Light Loss Factors are design constants equal to 1.0 at maintained illumination levels. *** Includes Luminaire Dirt Depreciation and Lamp Lumen Depreciation - per IESNA Lighting Handbook 9th Edition, page 9 -17. NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume + -3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3 feet of design locations. COPYRIGHT (C) 1987,2003 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writ- ten consent of Musco Sports Lighting. = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 180 360 EQUIPMENT LISTING Pole count Pole location Mounting height Pole size Elev. Foct. /unit Kilow /unit 1 S1 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 2 S2 -S3 85' 85' 0' 8 12.8 5 S4 -S8 65' 65' 0' 8 12.8 1 S9 80' 80' 0' 18 28.8 2 S10 -S11 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 1 S12 90' 90' 0' 16 25.6 2 S13 -S14 70' 70' 0' 9 14.4 2 S15 -S16 70' 70' 0' 10 15.47 2 S17 -S18 70' 70' 0' 11 16.54 2 S19 -S20 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S22 -S23 60' 60' '0' 9 13.34 2 . S24 -S25 60' 60' 0' 7 11.2 2 S26 -S27 • 60' 60' - 0' 9 13.34 2 : S28 -S29 70' 70' 0' 8 12.8 2 S30 -S31 70' 70' 0' 10 14.94 1 1.22 1.23 1.30 1.42 1.50 1.56 1.54 1.60 1.56 1.41 1.33 t22 1.14 1.08 1.05 0.98 0.92 0.80 0.70 0.71 Wit 0.63 0.57 0.50 0.43 0.49 0.59 0.69 0.76 0.90 7 0.38 47 49 49 50 52 TUKWILA, WA FORT DENT SOCCER COMPLE»' Si s 5' 56 0683 0.69 0.75 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.87 0.85 0.83 0.79 0.73 0.67 0.60 0.53 616.6' 742.9' i S25 912.1' S 8 911.2' 9 938.1' 2 1.3k351.416 1.12 1.19 1. 1.51 1.631.65 1.57 • 0.47 • 0.51 • 0.57 • 0.63 0.69 • 0.74 0.81 0.88 0.92 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 0.93 0.94 0.93 0.88 0.76 ' .78 0 .0 .18 .18 .04 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.48 0.55 0.620.63 0.42 0.5 Pole location dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point Q, 0.4 • 0.83 • 0.77 • 0.70 0.63 0.58 0.52 0.48 • 0.44 • 0.40 • 0.37 • 0.34 0.3 0 0.31 Fixture Type: Lamp Type: Lumens: File # / Date: Prepared By: - LD-8 MZ 1500W MZ/1000W MZ 155000/105000 101927/11- Feb -2003 C Hoy CO00 musco. GUARANTEED PERFORMANCE INITIAL SPILL LIGHT MAXIMUM FOOTCANDLES Target Points: Average: Maximum: Minimum: Avg /Min: Max/Min: 131 0.87 1.65 0.31 2.755 5.252 Number of Luminaires: 276 * KW Consumption: 432.06 * *Average Tilt Factor: 0.950 ***Recoverable Light Loss Factors: x 1.000 Total Light Loss Factor(LLF) 0.950 *Refer to amperage draw for electrical sizing. ** Additional non - recoverable Light Loss Factors are design constants equal to 1.0 at maintained illumination levels. * ** Includes Luminaire Dirt Depreciation and Lamp Lumen Depreciation - per IESNA Lighting Handbook 9th Edition, page 9 -17. NOTE: Light level averages and uniformities are guaranteed by MUSCO. However, individual location measurements may vary from computer predictions. INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS: Results assume + -3% nominal voltage at load side of ballast box and poles located within 3 feet of design locations. COPYRIGHT (C) 1987,2003 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING - Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writ- ten consent of Musco Sports Lighting. -(1)- = Pole Location SCALE IN FEET 0 180 360 9 l c'i f. 6OALE: 1'•60' lr _ s _ �.S • Q' r • `,„„ ( FORT DENT PARK TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PTN OF THE E112, NE1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 23 N. RNG. 4 E., W.M. AND THE W1/2, NW1 /4 SEC. 24, TWP. 23 N., RNG. 4 E., W.M. • CRASS OUIROD • CONTROL SKETCH SURVEY INFORMATION PROCEDURE I NARRATIVE A FIELD Tw5ERE *00 A SOO■ 3100- TOTAL SIATON. MID SDR -33- DATA COLLECTOR ylpgpmOED 01711 FEID NOTES WAS PERFOhED. ESTABI001O THE MCOAR, DSTMRE. AND VERI6'AL RELADERS1EPS BETWEN THE 001100FNIS AM TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES AS 510194 HEREON. A 1.012 0-25' AN01ATE LE TI OWL AHD ESTABLISH E ELEvA10N DF BFNCHWAR15 DATES OF SURVEYS FELO BURVE1 BY SWPNUSEN COH51610G 010*0RRS. NC. CONDUCTED NOI00ER. 2002 ALL 10NUIENIS SHOWN AS FUND WERE PISTE(' AT DWI ME. HORIZONTAL DATUM - BASIS OF BEARINGS THE 8156 OF BEARINGS AND POSITION FOR 1195 90005 15 TIE WA55CION STATE PLANE COMUMTE MIEN. PORN ZOE 014 1903 (1991) AS REPORTED BY TIC maRGTON STATE DEPA015011 OF TRANSPOOATDN. TIE D AV 101A04EN5 USED WERE: 9'S901 CPS 1 0 6001 1 1 10. 17105 -12. WHOA IS A BRASS 1OHOENT SET El TIC SOMA ON THE FAST SIDE OF THE 036108094 MERLE BRIDGE O'ERPASS OF 5R -405, HAMM A 10111)100 PALLE OF 171.694314 940 W EA51ND PAWS OF 1.290.203.642. B. WSDOT Cps L O RMEWT NO. 17105 -I3, 94901 5 A 1055 IIONUIENT SET 01 THE SDEWALI( ON 11E NORTH SDE OF DE (MACY WAY AMMO. EAST OF THE R1R00D TRACKS (TAT PASS 131001NFAT). APPROAWED 1.140 FEET LAST OF 011ERM811 MORE, HAMS A 94901010 AWE OF 171020.411 WO AN EASING PH10 OF ,1.292.237.907. VERTICAL DAMN - BASIS OF ELEVATIONS mom. GEODETIC VERTICAL OLTA1 OF 1929- ROW) 110 PROJECT BENCHMARK - FEMA BENCHMARK NO. RM231 AS SOWN ON 0T1NO ROOD 919000 i PR00JA11 FLOOD 96.RN1DE RATE IMP ND. 530130397B F DATED HAY II, 1995. MAP 576 a 1725 A ONE= 50ARE N ANGLE PONT ON THE NORTHEAST WHO WAIL OF 11E GONOETE NTE0IRBNI MIKE )ROLE OIER MEDI VIER N TNM5A E5pBIDED BY Wu HAL HC. ELEV. • 33.11 FEET J J S ITE BENCHMARK HMG HAIL WITH WISHER (01. 174203.3232. L 1290109.7561) LOCATE) 1025'W NORM A10 16.5' WEST OF SOUTH FOE HYDRANT AT SOUTH ENTRANCE OF 51E. ELEV. • 18.95 FEET WAG HM. WHIN WISHER (N 175910.140. E. 1289571.7861) LOCATED 101.0'0 SOUTH/EST OF CONCRETE FOOT MOE DEER AT NOM D0 OF DIE. ELEV. • 22.05 FEET NOTES 1. 1195 5 Nor A 80034100* 91020T. 2. TO WISRMT( 5 LARK AS TD ME ACO4aE' OR COUP ET0ES5 OF ANY UNDERGROUND LAMES. OILY 4152135 DORM ABOVE DE 9UEIG RF DE GROUND MK ®R 9M010 BY BARGHA SEN CON54111C Moan NC. ANY OOEPCAOAO 811.5E5 9.2.0 01 116 SaNEY ARE PER PANT RAM PLACED BY OTHERS. COISTNICION PLANS. O2. IS -BUILT D AWRL5 1901® BY nom COMPARES OR 0106. 3. DEPTHS a IMOEROa30 IMAMS I1&010WN D PI AS SHOWN. A. 001 ALL 04.0101 419115 HALE TR> 910941 01ai AS WINLER HMS. ETC. 5. 5116RUPA E FOLD IRAN PIPES (0 MII HAVE NOT BEEN 9011. 6. 5E2AT05 SHOWN AT FADE K 000 ARE AT FIDNNE UTILITY CONTACT UST GA5 LEGEND MO La Iw a$n WE Dag Tat ®• 0¢00 wmI WA 6 TOME maim Y ❑ an O2. 0020 O HAM wow DaNO Q woo so meal 630 DAMN SO 9DL9a Goa B Maw 93 (0) 63 ma mot (10 Ex R 600511 B 7010 1001(x0 ® maw m O Ra00Naa N ow ♦ COMM 400 SO Elam Waal moot awn - wale TDO - DAw waSIDAD MOO= �H1 - x- GAIT um Ina NW NTW 0 sow 0Ina 0loss TREE LEGEND C) Wow Ir maD w to ®1964 V aPEla 6051E 0 T9a it a wasp An Or 9946 17 Mein 9m Or WW e owe maw w• Nan O IRE tr warn 1R WI IC MATE Mai 101 It mica wTU&® WD it aala owns in TELEPHONE: 018E WATER $0901: 51091.4 ORA90GE: PUGET 9100 DEALT P.O . 10 90669 BELEVUE WA 91005 -0901 (B00) 321 -4123 PUGET SouRD E10001 P.O. 803 50089 BEUEWE.1A 93009 -0863 (840) 321 -4123 OVI SI COAMYAT05 23315 - 6613 AVDME WMH REM. WA 53032 (253) 372 -5390 AT&T BT0A0010 P.O. BOA 1000 AUBURN. WA 96002 (NS) 624 -3105 011 OF imam 6400 500110030) 30433510 TATRA WA 931® (206) •330179 arc a 11090* Moo � BD4EVMD (209) 433 -0179 CRT OF 7504044 6300 SOJ00OIER 004D510 MAMA WA 96168 (206) 433 -0179 MATCH LINE RECEIVED JUN 0 5 21103 a FORT DENT PARK } W cs > 2 fn W � W z v N Z 03 N Co 01 4 N W U a Co W ? 3 N Z W N 13 LLI LL Z O I✓ I- Z 0. < TOPOGRAPHIC z 0 co N Z W CO Z N X Q C CO • O W a° a CO LL IM r• $ O MATCH LINE SCALE: 1'.60' V f LEGEND Im am 90 w Inn a$n II Im alp CB Ems Aram Ka o laaloa nam n ❑ cool an rya) O sow area (moo O A warm sea aaaa Rs* s+ala na anaa 9E9 m arm woof OS lllaq + tomcat s n a I• . .q Vit? rs.M alas oat aan — — aa■ Mac la[ WW1. a MOM .ala- s— n0 a■fmlt — x— aw lot ma TREE LEGEND Imp Ir won n la Ifhl Kbum K as 0 Ifltrr' It papa Iwo la 0 Wm Ir mace ammo oa 0 Ma a' tam moms Ira p wow Ir own of II¢ ® afa Ir coon lea on Mx StaYa10 a117 aaa Or DM Ir 0100 ma pr moo 4' MOM ns®ml V FORT DENT PARK TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PTN OF THE E112, NE1 /4 SEC. 23, TWP. 23 N. RNG. 4 E., W.M. AND THE W1/2, NW1 /4 SEC. 24, TWP. 23 N., RNG. 4 E., W.M. RECEIVED 'JUN 051003 OaaAlAan nmem [WPM, g a W CC • cr 6 co d co U Z = W D. o < cc 0 O O LL O I- W C N Z C N N U N W V N Cl) W = 3 N 2 W N LAI Z T+ ~ W LL S O I- X 0 H Z d Q Q STARFIRE SPORTS LL Z 0 • ZN W et cm X Q O m 3 a p W a� a E m IN .Nn 05 It 13. GUrllIY\OCO -lfl ,11111 ann- GOI.Owp Pilot BRUCE DEES& ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture • Urban Design Ste Planing • Recreation Facilities Design 1a E ma b M Tesmgq®QI -7N7 SUBCONSULTANTS: EASSYONS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 212622ND ST SE PUYALLUP, WA 98372 -7116 OFFICE (253) 8441566 FAX (253) 445-9747 FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL STARFIRE SPORTS SOCCER COMPLEX AT FORT DENT PARK RECEIVED JUN 0 A 2083 co�uw.r RECEIVED JUN 05 2103 COMAUNTI FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL PERMIT .-- — ..�... N. e•r r--o 11111111111111111111111111111111111 COVER SHEET JOB: 10701 111111111111111111111111111 G1 Sheet 1 0120 PROJECT VICINITY SYMBOLS SECTION & DETAIL CALLOUT SECTION NUMBER ' , ' CONTENTS G7 COVER SHEET C2 EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY -NORTH SOUTH G3 PLAN Cl LAYOUT 8 MATERWS PLAN - GRID 'A' C2 LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN - GRID 'B' C3 LAYOUT ✓¢ MATERIALS PLAN - GRID 'C' C4 LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN - GRID 'D' C5 LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN - GRID 'E' C6 LEVEE BANK SECTION C7 GRADING k DRAINAGE PUN - GRID 'A' CB GRADING DRAINAGE PUN -GRID 'B' CC700 GRADNG $ DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'D' C12 DRAIINAGE SECTIONS DETAILS GRID 'E C73 PLANTING PLAN L1 BUILDING PIAN Al BUILDING ELEVATIONS ACE BUILDING ELEVATIONS w,1 �l- & —�sr ?1 .Filio. it °� -' i., " tv ti. 1r� x7 - e' y° y"� ;�.. tmco/pperyu��\, �t Verk `.,r"' `''� ? r.� 4A• sp Iy , yJ � � d,"n ` . ` E., r '.4.". �s ww =�' } L 'Fj.Esr ; ¢/ • - 1 -1x. `�i'++�* -. V L, i' .. ¢ yid h� FOI4V t IJ -, - . • =fy L.: __ 5 i.0 �'Tx>"• i `} 1 : f'1'g �'"i;l f r v DIRECTION OF CUT �� REFERENCE DETAIL CALLOUT DETAIL NUMBER G.ER,r Q � -4 , .Yyr *Y.k,9 -:' �4{'� �wv i 1,741.444:•• "'.• ' aI ;b ; t;..n? AtJ �a.. xi/ t'ti. T- t :•: X.4 1 . 7 T .'t'Ta? 3. • fi ? lF�k ? {�I�p,. $', P.Mfk ° V SHEET REFERENCE t1 EIS .: 5y • 9‘`‘,• s .62,.:;,!':4'.:: �A -.rum a °,� P � - - bwr f=�e roc €' {�� r1 z' RECEIVED JUN 05 2103 COMAUNTI FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL PERMIT .-- — ..�... N. e•r r--o 11111111111111111111111111111111111 COVER SHEET JOB: 10701 111111111111111111111111111 G1 Sheet 1 0120 I • • ? „~ Nr • 3•. r ' 19.1 i- try • PROPOSED STAGING PLAN 2003 STAGE 1 ENHANCE 4 SOCCER FIELDS & ASSOCWED. SREWORK 2003 .-STAGE 2 04000R SOCCER . FAWN, • RESIROOI4 COMMON & MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS & ASSOCIATED SOEWORN STAGE 3 E FIELDS (WEST OF ENTRVICE ROAD) dimq WCnV1 pgA�la IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlhIIIIIIIIIIII 41 EXISTNG PAR KING — T¢ REMAIN 6 s:! STAGE III P 1 STAGE I Lou - 100' Idle 1 IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT EXISTING GRANDSTAND 1 W/ NEW ROOF 12' WIDTH FIRE ACCESS GREEN RIVER 20' WIDTH FIRE TURN— AROUND h 200' tISSV IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT L,o.1 100' HMI IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT RIVER ENVIRONMENT r 0 60' 120' 18D' 1111111111111111111111111111111 SCALE: I'. -60' RECEIVED - .JUN 05 2E03 FINAL PERMIT Sll�M TTAL cw,•esm - - •• • .r._ w .r •■• ••0 G4 Shoat 4 of 20 W-C WPM A' ECH *. . , 1RENCH WAR .....- COWIN LOW HO RACES 50'4 504 -.......- 44.0 STI.-0. 50' -0. 6'4' .i......4.,1.2r..^.171-rn.11.;,■,...., ,G;;,....u.,ikrf.,,,,,;Gi,,,,;sas,,,,,,,,,,,,;:;,,„Tr,,,,,;, - ---"" " ' ",,,,;;;;;;;;;;;;;Tfo";;;, -n4.k,=;wmcuart.rAWi'k.o.......,..-.....;;i.s...'..7.r.Z.N6.;D7:r.Zgv is ;,;■.`lri-...1.47sil.:1—iro-vis;S...1.47,-----4.- ",--COSIDC FIELD b n 0 MAR RTID--.0 TEC PRE GRANDSTAND —0 SLR OF =ROE VAR EDGE IT WOO REST ROW - 1 - - ..e 2DH.jff —00311110 M. M / WAR 11 ACCESIBLE SPACES (22 TOTAL) 5-ir CLEIR --. 11 ACCES1BLE SPACES cum 5-0.' RDA 1 4 (22 TOTAL) -TAW- -fr j 7 7 lir _11111 __ 11111 . lIt i 1 _, _ . -.. W 0 -WL I -tilLi,,, _ 1 i ,;,1 „ , UI,ifr l r, 1r1r _ A ., Jfjf 1- W-r 5r-s• -t- is-ir 6 TR 0 1 TH. 0 1 ... 21- 1R. 0 1 TR 0 1 OFloor Plan Seale : 1/8. 1.-0" B. 5W-Cr 44.-. 511-0. SY-If B. ; ri 11'1 rg-FTIS1111111111:11J1, 11:11,111 11;1; . tit .14111 1'1 id; I l 31 1W-11 ;lid: ;1'17 H11 : . ” whillitilhhi f, 1.! ; y, w, I h 11111,11 1;1 h 1.1,11T[Ill 1 iilli,01111-r!:11! H 'it i,1! !hit! , !.I 1 11: 1; 1 • , !! -r! !11 11, , i• 1:H .1111 11 111„11, Ih1:1111 .i1,11W1 ihm 111,i 1,1;14 „Hilij 111 !!!, h t:Th 1ihiH Ilit.III.Ill,i •11.1 110,11 iiiiithhh,"hlhh !1,11111 ;KW II 1,1,.hi Ilimishhhi h tywhii '11,1 ' 11thi;1 1111110.,11h1,thclir,, 11, i 1 hik , 11 1,,imilcl! h h 111,1. it, ills! 111111 I .J111,1111 !ill ; !ill! hiJch'i ,1!111 I I , I, cit Hj 111,1,.T 1,I ! !! id,1!1,11.11111::1111',11,11,14! "1,1111 111,1i id! 1111,:i 1.,1:1,11, W 11 '1.1 111i11:1111! hi!! 11:11h1 11 1(111111:J01 : 1 1,,i 0111; 11,.i'll Iiii,l11111 " ' :11111 II 011!,11.1111 ! :11 ! di111:11 11 !i, HILHI " d • 11', 1111 I'llillilli:1111:11i11111 1111 I'll! 111; 111 h 1 11;i1 11 1 1 11;11 111111111i 111 cil ,11: !II: 11, h:i 11.1; I 111 01111i 1,j fnii !!ii 111 71111:1111‘ Hill, h d 1111 0 cp- (D. c:r1) () (6) (6) (7) (1.3) (9) • • r- _ r",mmTnirrniri- mow 1! SIVR 1 ! 133:1 I I 1 1 Cr OXE OF CONCREM • 21T-0. 0C-0' 3O'-a irr TrrnWr. , .11,1111 00 0 CI 0 ® CD sC) ® • • /• •-,• \ \ �` \ \• \\ hw RiP Nui \ \\ \ \ \• DOWN 1.25 \ \ ;\\ •, \\ . ;� ) ' NEW CON \ I \I\ \ 0C,7N 5._ ,,...„. ,..,;.,...... ....„..._..... \ , \\ lorr+ \,. ,...............„,„.„_............\ ........ ......„... s ,,,,, .\ �` \� \\ ., ,.......\\,\„\\,,...,,\ •\ \ 'N:\,,\:',:,\,, \ \'' j tarn. , '\ I �l ! /j!% %// \ i it 1 ' 1 , s.. +- '�� i / /i'� ' /7ji ' / /b-N . \ \—� - 1c,\ . /i :j; // f/ ;I _ 1�' /fi /� L' 14.75 13.06 fMR\ • : 18 LOCKED (4).5.X 2' .-CO TYPE i 8191 = 14 .77 / 0 /ELBOW IE 6• PVC N = 13.07 V // vv. �c- W PIGCESIBLE SEATING CRESS STAIRS ,>c s--CB TYPE I PILL = 14.71 W /E19OW iS 6• PVC N =12.96 •RECYC1E W.474: • . � IYP_ !/ 11.84 I. , '; , '\ \\.,::,_...,„<..\-\ -iADUER MYi J5 P,SEF ° \ \ . \ 6• WC "f_ = 1 1.04 ��( ctla>``/ „�-,\ \\ 1E 6• PVC S = 11.04 ' LCLed 0 :..a•, \`� , IE 6• Pt Wl = 11.04 ''\ -.-.•.:;=, '\ \\ 1 i \ SyoE1 �e \ SPOOTS EGUYteih'C` / •_��_ `\ \ \� \ ' \,; T1. EE i 1I = 1456 570164Gf 81NS �, \ \\ -� \ •�•.• \ \ IE 6• PJC 5 = 13.38 ':\ \.'S \; , \\/------ \\'‘'!..,'.\\ {', • LYTY -YlV\ _ 7 1 y�1✓ j' %i E I .r 1W n'U - 14.71 '' \\\ '- \/ CE 6' W', r: = 13.31 SOG; a Fat: £4011 -SSW. RIM = 1490 'r A r`, r- 1.1 - k an IBL • IRMOIP R6l = 14.75 H /c^.90W 1E 6` P1C N = 12.85 z. CL-Q1 AND CCER FIELD / % lr. • OSite Plan Saab: 1••,Cir V j : j / / i -,��/ /:' " ", , / t-or /son Arcniteetd f.) Architecture & Planning carlson 2111 Third Avenue Beale WA 98121 7efeph® 2064413066 Facsimile 206 728 4661 _n RIR re00f OMB ISSUER =IAA rmv®u Mco. DOSE eau Dime Mabel Or. sw.r o.K Starfire Soccer Complex St Fart Dent Park Tt1ae@a, Washington Starfire Stadium Enhancement SITE PLAN A -0.2 wgenraw m0e21e is pS1We 0Ita1 Aralemals Pe OSite Plan Dais : gar 1,11. PROJECT NOR1914 TRUE NOFR11 Carbon Architects PS Architecture & Planning Carlson 2111 ThirdA.e®e Seattle WA 98121 TelesE® 206 441 3066 Female 2067284661 ISSUED FOR: DO PROGRESS D ATE 00*0* 414115 REVISIONS e D. DOE MSC o-el•AM e Oman ne Starfire Soccer Complex el FOR Dent *Park Tukwila Washington SITE PLAN A -1.1 Pm600 No.: 20021e C pyrgta Canoes NCetWs Pe 0 O 0 r___ O 0 5. 0 O O 0 (3 O _4 O OEnlarged Bathroom Plans Scab : Ste. ra 0..' ra Ilee9ti O Ou IOW MR ® lei° I 1101116.01111.10 INNWL rTh © yr Um ea• i a u mme sow © mnnUm +B awns ABU mane ®®OnBa a6[ COMM 10M 77. mOSRenaa•CCerLera Q one Ole OTypical Fixture Mounting Heights Saab : 4141. rd rd ear COME IBM ell eB111e1 Itewa CPC= Macs ou ROLM 1m 100 ea WW1 Ina CE COM OW WM= NU 04 OFloor Plan scab: Ile'. Tor FIRE LANE IF 111111 11 !l 111 it H111 1111 1,1 ;!1 1 ! 1 1 1 1, 11l+1;I' j ` I 1 1 1! ;�, i 1 111 '11 1 ! ! 1 il,, 1111 !{ � 111 I 1 Ii 11111�i1t11, 11i111!ij1 0 i,! 1, 1i ii Iil�� i+ jii +I!�1i1 i,!! 11 1 II ii 1 ! 1 1 i 1 1 ! I 1 ;111;111 111 11,1;, 11 {liljll 111111i1i1 11111 111',1 l, ' 1 ! 141!1 1 1 ;1 ;, it 11 1i II 11.1 i j'1 il!11�111'j 11!1 111 1 i it I! l -1,j 1'11 ► 11 1 1' +j1! 111Ij II I 1 ;11 !i!� Ili ll 1 ; ii j j !i 1 1 1 ORoof Plan Sane :,le'.to" O C a aw t.arsson Architects ra Architecture & Planning carlson 2111 T taAvean Sallie WA 91121 Telephone 2064419066 F.®ile 206 725 4661 ISSUED FOR PERMIT MIE M Mat Dawn es ne amen a.ae,�ae..e I+ 11 I 11 it 1' Starfire Soccer 11 Complex 1 eF Fort Dont Park ! I Tolman, Washington 11 Starfire Stadium Enhancement MAINTENANCE BUILDING PLANS A -2.1 Papa No, 20021e SbWd5e1 Osbon Pedalos 1.8 0 0 0 o II us or new Kos . 10-0. 2r-Cr WA. C13 0 0 61 (5 37-0• Main Level Plan Sods inr P-at I Carlson Architects PS Architecture & Planning cads on 2111 Third Avenue Softie WA 98121 206 441 3066 TFeleehree 206 721 4661 ISSUED POW 1:10 PROGRESS 04TE *MED, ant REWSIONS M. DATE Owen By: Owner A.m. Deed. co. Star-fire Soccer Complex Fort Dent Perk TukvADA Washington MAIN LEVEL PLAN A-2.2 Pelee No 200216 Capp986 Centre Nenfterta P13 —4 41:111I:j1:111::::::111A7 N y \ 1 ! / " , , i I \ A ! t / / I \ / 1 ■ , —r ...ft \ L '/' 1 I i ',''' I --;--- -- 4.____.... I I 3"--7--.-------=--'___— t------= ----------k' --." . N ' I I / ! \ ' I / ...7..• ..■ \ .■ e• ...r. .■. •■■■■•■ •■ • 41■■••• • ....■ i ..• ............ .... ■.....i.... ..... .4...•7„. 1 ( I 1 I ! i I I i / ! L.,... I ■ • • \ t_ • .1i .1 Ili 11111 ;1;11111'1'111111 J11011101111 II' 111'''''111 I 1111 ',11111'11,11111'11 •ot - ir-o* sr-O At -V Wir x•-r 7r-O Lpio ,6 id) 16 6, ,6 c) C) Upper Level Plan ScEro : inr • i‘cr Carlson Architects PS Architecture & Planning carlson 2111 Third Avenue Soule WA 98121 Iritolone 206441 30f6 FIe 206 7284661 ostIED FOIL CO PROGNI018 ENTE MEM WA REVISIONZI MI ORM MOM pee If, puo.albs: 0.•••••lotrart Starfi re Soccer Complex 61 Port Dent Pork ToloolIkt. Washington UPPER LEVEL PLAN A-2.3 Pro6r1140, 200216 DWAIN Conan AnOlhors PI3 .1?-9EP P P —1— —+ 1 1 1 11,4f 1(41. it 1, iii ii; 111 I - I '111 I 1 1 i I t) i 1 j-triti-riiitli-r-nitilti-tlitlfiri i i i ihIllit'" i ' !!illi , !HI I !hill i 1111 I III! 1 i,,j1„ hi.d ,11, 1 : 1 i 1 I 'LI- I! 1 .,1.'11 it li II li 1111111 11'. II r; 11 II lir III III II 1111 !I i! 1111 Irfl li 1 I 1 I I 1 I 'IF f.' illdi 1 i! 111W 1111 li-14-1,, Illy ;I 11111,1 IiIiII Ii 1, I'r M i „ il I, ii.i1.1 111'1'1 II ll ' , Li II II 4144t., ,... T i 1 1,1 .1 ii I ill I 1 ii I i It I 1 11 1 I II, 7.1-,-, ' I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 11 , i I ! 1 1 I 1 1,1-n1i 1 11111 ' 111111.1h I illd :11101 14-111fri+ I del i IIIII 1 i 111 ',11 t ;.I fri ,i, II li it li II, 111 • , 0.,, owl ;;1111.1• ii 1111 il 1 t il .11 id •, 'ill I 1 1 1 -., i , ', iii!;1 :I ii 111111 1.1, lill.,,i d h :10,, ,, 1, s.; itip, 1 1,', 1111 1 .f I -; 11 , .1-1,-,p---, f • . 111,11, Ill I 1,1:1 11 il ,. 11; F1;1 . II _ilvif;Ii- rhil lirl -10 I!IIII 1.01 i -i-L-1- 1 ; ; I 1 I i I 1-1-- i 1 , : 1 .,, 4i.,,t4141.--1---, ,. 1l 1 1,,, II -Li41 1-Li ;; 1111 1; !III ;', 11 II gill, rol ii ii 1.i ii ,r, ti i il filirrithfrIfll II 11 li II 11 11 I i'l i I I.,1!; 1 i 1 , 111-id HI i 1 ,ildlii!illii !Li i !III', I 1 livill Id i 1 iiII:i _,4II I dr.F.,11iltiii.111 !Hi!! :1 i i iio li i ; Illiii, !, 1,1 1,1,11 I, iii -11 il II ..Illr 11 ti Iiit'r '1;i HI :I ii :ill ,I..4.12., 11 I, 1-If • I H.101 I,- ,1 ill ,,, II il I .„1, ., t I, 1 I ;III _II ' .iii--711 ,, 1 il i di! I i : 1! I . ;1. --11- i ..1 i 1 . ;,ill ' '4i , ,,, ;II; ,,I, ;II: : !III foi I it . i f II 1 i , 1,1,1,01! 1 1 i__L_Ii , ;lid __ILi1,1111 I II III II ; iii; i iilil 111111 i '-' ',I 1, ,, ,i, .:1,,,I., Idly. ii II Ili , 11,11. ill „I! 11., 111. Ii; .I' Hi- w II,: ii! 41_4 II! 1 1 1 0 AI. 'i'gt• ii ail! I II i , LIA--H,-1144-1-fri-, HMI iii , ! !hi I. 11 11111111i, I 1.1,1i -1,.,4444-1 1,4--,ir, I, 1 i 111,11, .111,1],ii, -1,-i47' H ii II A TI 1 1;1; i 1 I • I i il 1 ..,1_111.11, 1'4' I ii i 1 11, . q i 1 1,,1111111111; 1 , :. 1111111 ilk TC III 1. ,--4-1-... Ili II'. 1, li ii 11;1 jr,41,1*,1. m•ii,4,111_11+11:Fdi_ii--1-41 ta-• ar.4r ®0 C) Roof Plan S:IlIr.10 Carlson Architects PS Arahiteetnr• & Planning carison 2111 /laird Avenue Sena A 98121 Tekehtse 206441 3066 Facsimile 206 723 4661 ISSUED FOR OD PROGRESS DATE OSIER AIMKO NEWSOM WS OM Starfire Soccer Complex St Fart Own Park Taman. Washington ROOF PLAN A-2.4 P55.01666.: 200215 Copy5015 0.bonA520:5515 PG East Elevation Seale vir sc? I ! 1111"1 I :1;1J °I1EAffittilititaffil II I t ra. Ltuariatt umaismill 111.073711771X113. DEO, !MD joravolirmor, usrorq4 owr,, o■er M • - 10' 0 9' 0 cp, xederbr ekreetions.thep IX West Elevation s.ar : i; 1111 Pa aftittowfutollifimi imini.IIEmillminilmitiitil. *film m ..0 2:E NE sigulEil Nadia n'''—;trainci Lunt [ 7111113, p20 OM* ;OM: 3•11E1 Hill .1 11 11 MI t 111111 wo uso r■N &mg! M 1111I , 1111 IFS 01,n4 • gir-• 4•Freerl File :exterior elevedlons.dera „bot-r '6 "fame e eass • Ian FBe =den", eleridlortedeg M-F pm use CDNorth Elevation Scale : 1/16. e WS' IMIL 11 FT M ffill ElitlitaM114 1 I w. P.2 1.1 WWI WO %NO OM& OM OM& I 1/1 Wit mu IT -WZ t"- *MD Kt•Fas finththunith OE -I. N.0 4 g 0 Ed th Mil UM MnWo--.iw-fI Ha-, I 0.0 'U'U.' ..0 "r i 6111 ; fil - if:1111111111111111111 st-F MI MI Fie meerksrelevelformtlera Carlson .Are hi te cts PS Architecture &Planning carlson 2111 IlsirdAveme Seattle WA 93121 Tea:pee= 206441 3066 Facsimile 206 723 4661 ISSUED FOR 00 PROWESS M1E1330E12 40033 REmeacam an [sem Mase Oaasreenone 1.•■•■■ffic Starhre Soccer Complex at Fort Dent Peek Tukav100. weeningtten BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-3.1 Wablelmoz wome CormIght Ceebon Amhara, PG OBuilding Section scale: 168'. Td FOe xluwg nctioMlvg Carlson Architects PS Archltset.re &Planning carlson 2111 Third Averse Sank WA 98121 Meeker 206 441 3066 F.®le 2162281661 ISSUED Felt mwmaESO OAOE 061.163Y . 1116) revamrm Kt use MOM and. inc a. —Ax.- Comb. Rs Starfire Soccer Complex el Fort Dane Park Taleem.. Washer/ton BUILDING SECTIONS A -3.2 Prclee6Ne.: 2002W Deantaat Gh0mArdeens Pe �AwiOti 111111111111 Illllll�il gi���I!'�I�I�Ie_�:.,:I�� u.. — / /.! / %ELI /1////_L / / /J/!—.e. �mlllwi Ir, 1il! l�ltilrbo�ji i ,, „ /�.�i . lillltli 111070 l�'p11 t 1:1"11111111 p i1 / ' uun� VS I I_ I■�I I1. ■ ■t1i�Fa1 r►. �,;�, Ii r R•I•r owl al i wariiiV.lUI' I '' ' 014th l �4ur %� i.y�! 1�1•� 1��1 ma. i !. 1uai�il ���+1 1`�.mi 115 i�5 t ; ,Ii,1; t11,11� ,111 lilt liil itIN% 111101UI, I. iii lll��l'''itilti `1 11111111111111ull -- �1111N Alli l 1! it�1 Illl�t dt111 ill j h ��I■i�1'11a11rA I tr111retf!ter.� ■0 1 ��-; li ■WI ..a VIM • 4 �,ijn. �ni II71S li ' 111 p u1 nllit,, r ,-K t11am 1"L'`jl IIdI1111111ir7111111111) 1111Ih�c,!y i`L1IJIIUi.fl141,,,p IUi it �ip/VCC atmi ■till � �.�- — a!I, 1 11111 111 _11N116! I �li I n 1��111 Ulnlitn�u' !R). ,1 +w *a .-9,0+:„, 1,14 11 ���■� • =+� , IIJ; 1111\!11 • &a r,e. ''te&E.S ulr 'teA ov\ 1° -1(0' iI111t1�1Qill! an►u�1►�uuui1u1l16mmimium __I h��l .�e ❑u a ei Rul „ , ;'i!_a'� �' A�1� �I UnaRuq ,_ ;,,�u1, � Ill 1 _ :a ,. It A11111111 11 , 1 ll� , ° l �R ,1i.0 i . I. ■, ��111I �/ r r e. 1/ 111111111 —; . i 1 ■I I. N I■ 11� IIII. l �� ua1 11 _'�IIIIIIIIt ilI19H11111p11III111. 11aR11 1IIYIIIRR11AlIIt16;i1J llilll! �„�..;1 : : :: ,. i .... 1 1111 11 I .1,1r� 1 t, l„ �1tItil��h.;. :1,11�.,..�.11llll _I1�1111111111111111 ���,� ►�� r r :II iUII „�'t l m.nm o, ti :.'��e� �.�! : c'. �� 'I -r ai�i'�.e+.. RMIDI ►it II D t s tfC�V�S .1 1 ten...- - - 6/1/65 - Cat B.gr-V1 Carlson Architects PS Architecture & Planning carlson 2311 Thad Avenue Seattle WA 96121 Telephone 206441 3066 Facsimile 206 726 4651 61 DATE MECUM 400 eevlcnY. NO. OCT D. —/ePa. Starflre Soccer Complex Fort Dant Pork To ELEVATIONS A -3.3 Ropes Ro: 210116 DaPalsit Carlson Arotamte PS 200' L IMPACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT 100' ACT RIVER ENVIRONMENT 40' RIVER ENVIRONMENT' WATER (O1-1W) MARK 110' OM`N SETBACK 125' ,OHW SETBACK G R EE N i s. /� � \ ` I ' <• \ —I — 1— — IRACT 34 • <( Qo- Iy i I I I I I I I I a 0 .111■11o111111/ COMPOSITE SITE PLAN J08 10703 SGIE: NOTED IIIIMIIIIIIIIIID RECEIVED 0 40 80 120 NAR 24 8108 GRAPHIC SCALE • SHORELINE PERMIT SUBMITTAL --4.— SHEAR GATE AND FLAP GATE UFT HANDLES (0.0SED. POSITION) FLAP GATE UFT HARDIE come POSMON) FINISH GRADE GROUT DTP 12t1A. RISER INBAR LADDER STEPS CAST INTO CONC. ROUND Lamm LTD r*ORAN". (SEE WSOOT pme. 9-30.70-00) (SEE WSOCIT STD. RAN 9-30.70-00) RISER SECDON CONC. LID SECTION SET AT 100 YR. PEAR DEVELOPED ROW It r IN SHEAR GATE (SEE PRECAST "Sitc. ENS" BOTTOM ELEV. kg* NOTES; T112• two 1. TYPE 2 CB (MIH) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WIDI SPECIFICATIONS IN WMOT SIMARD PLANS USING INERT REVS SHORN. 2. OWLET CAPACITY: 100-YEAR DEVELOPED PM( FLOW. 3. AIL METAL PARIS CORROSION RESISTANT. NON-GALVMEED PARTS PREFERRED. GALVRAZED PIPE PARIS TO HAVE ASPHALT TREATMENT 1. 4. FRAME AND LADDER OR STEPS OFFSET SO: A. SHEAR GATE 5 VERNE FROM TOP. CLINI-D004 SPACE IS CLEAR OF RISER MID SHEAR GATE 5. INSTALL FLAP GOOE FOR ORIFICE CLOSURE SUCH THAT THE GATE PROVIDES A WATER TIGHT SEAL OVER THE ORIFICE WHEN THE GATE 5 IN THE CUMED POSITION (SCE UFT HANDLE ROD LENGTH AS REQUIRED FOR 'CLOSED' MOUNTING POSITION SHOWN). 0 TYPE 2 CATCH BASIN/CONTROL STRUCTURE (TYPICAL) CONNECT TO DEBT. 12' OUT TO COSTING MORN POND SUPPORT: rx 0.079' STEEL STRAP BOLTED r IN WALL EA. SIDE (TYP) W PULE Waste STEEL CUP 'GATE FOR ORIFICE CLOSURE (SEE NOTE 5) ; ROW. CONC. BASE fr DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK BASE TOP OF INFILL MATERIAL . FINISH GRADE MID= FABRIC (TYP) *EEL WHERE B SHALLOW MID CR704 5 ABOVE SUEIGRADE ELEVATION, DRAINAGE NX. EMENDS ONLY TO SJBORADE DRAINAGE AGGREGATE (COMPACT TO 95% OF WC DRY DENSITY) RACE PIPE 0% OF 111E1401 It EDE HOP PIPE COLLECTOR DRANUNE (MERE ELEV VARIES) MIlL MAX. 1241I1L MAL urmAL 112DICH SUEIGRADE (COURAGE TO 95% OF MAX DRY DEMSTO TYPICAL COLLECTOR TRENCH DENLIQUEDEULIAIERALS DEPTH WRIES. (SEE PLANE) Lop OF INPUT. MATERIAL FINISH GRADE DEPTH (SEE PUNS) 2' TEL LEVELING COURSE PLACE PIPE 0 OF 'TRENCH PREFABRICATED ex4'x4" HOP TEE OR am, (1w) SOLID HOP Omni VARIES-SEE RAN) FRET Erlexe HDP TEE DRAINAGE MGREGAIE (COMPACT TO 95X OF MAX DRY DENSITY) MAX. It PERE HOP PIPE 12M5& 'TRENCH SUBGRADE COLLECTOR DRAINUNE 1ETUAX. (COMPACT 10 95% CIF OWEN ELEV VARIES) MAX DRY DEWEY) AGGREGATE PP LATERAL DRANLINE 710/ DEPTH DRAINAGE AGGREGOE LEVELNG COURSE GEOTOGILE RUM ayp) LATERPL/COWLCIOR TICK 0.EARPNCE VARIES (room) TYPICAL LATERAL 8" PERFORATED HIP SUBDRAINLINE COLLECTOR & LATERAL CONN. DETAILS SOU : 4- PERFORATED PIPE 0 (PP) SUBDRAINLINE LATERAL SCALE: r RECEIVED MAR 24 NW 03101Marr 0093.171MENT SHORELINE PERMIT SUBMITTAL 111111111101 III L. 1:17 a 0 ■ENINMINEIPA JOB: 10703 SCALE: NallED 11111111111111111111111111111111111 SP-2 Sheet 2 of 3 12. • / LAYOUT & MATERIALS LEGEND ee� r ASPLNLT PANKNC LOT PAWS OVER 4• CMIS ED SURFACING BASE REINFORCED RREUNE ASPHALT PAWIG C CONCRETE PAVING OVER r CRUSHED SURFACING BASE 4• DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK SIRFA RG SttmmEIE DRF SOCCER FIELD ORNAMENTAL PLANTING (SEE RANTING PUNS) PLANING OVER NATIVE SOIL (SEE RAIDING PLANS) CONCRETE CURB & CUTTER - (GUTTER SLOPES 10 CURB) -.� CONCRETE BARRER CURB - (GUTTER SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB) DOSING SS EASEMENT _ _ _ FIRBANE — — CONSTRUCTION UDOT LINE — — PHASE MOT UNE DIADNtDOC MICE (TYPE & HBGHT AS NOTED) —70— PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE (SEE GRADING COWS) —7n— =DIG CONTOUR LIB EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND FOR EXISTING SITE FEATURES SE E)aSTT NG SITE TOPOGRAPHY PUNS. SHEETS G2 & G3. FLOOD ELEVATION THE 100 -YEAR ROOD ELEVAITO N 5 20.7 AS DEIERMDIED BY THE OTT aF 1U VI A l \ 0135-52-1 3070t-201.amj PIottM at Thu Jun 05 It 14:55 2003 KEY PLAN I/ 5. s✓3 fa.Vl,e, a 4' WS1TIH am R' _ // vw tin -.., /1 -a„ # -Q. ,33- - 11 / - - � •y irA \\ ACG4SS UNE C y c' MATCHLINE — GRID B O 20 40 60 SCALE: I•_20' RECEIVED NN 0 FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL SCALE: I• -20' IIIIIIIIIIHIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIUHII Cl Shed 5 of 20 LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN - GRID 'B' W®. . \�'. o-+il�yyr • LAYOUT & MATERIALS LEGEND n+6o " pp>GY 5' WOE, li FIIGFl - pEOES'1RIAN SWNG -GATE ,,- IOM 2 ASPHALT PARKING LOT PAVING OVER 4' CRUSHED SURFACING BASE REINFORCED FI DIANE ASPHALT PAVING 4 CONCRETE PAVING OVER 2 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE 4' DEPTH CRUSRD ROCK SURFACING 11111111111111111111111111111111 11 I; J J SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELD PLANTING (SEE PUNTING G PLANS) PLANTING OVER NATNE (SEE PLANTING PLANS) SOIL CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER ((UTTER SLOPES TO CURB) CONCRETE BARRIER CURB (GUTTER SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB) DOSING SS EASEMENT — — — FINEUHNE — — CONSTRUCTION MIT UNE — PHASE UNIT UNE CIWNUNK FENCE (TYPE & HEIGHT AS NOTED) --70 -- PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE (SEE GRAOONG PLANS) — 70— DIETING CONTOUR LINE EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND FOR COSTING SITE FEATURES SEE EXISTING STE TOPOGRAPHY PUNS, SHEETS G2 & G3. FLOOD ELEVATION THE 100 –YEAR FLOW ELEVATION IS 20.7 AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA TOP OF EXISTING LEVEE //�� ORDINARY HIGH WAITER 1 IN R V DOD F11 - R \UI*NINR110701= 1\0®-5E- 1\W01i92.aq Platted at. Thu do 05 10:15:12 2003 DIETING GRAVEL PATH TO RDMIN KEY PLAN 1' =600' 0 20 40 60 RECEIVED JUN 05 2003 CIEVELOPIOR SCALE 1' =20' FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL JOB: 10701 SCALE: 1' =20' IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII C2 Shoat 6 of 20 t001D Flle: R \OIa0IIC9\10701' 1 \6133- 5E- 1 \0701-C i.a g Platted at 10u Jun 05 14 16; 39 2003 ACCESS: wrlE: RETAINING WALL COSTING GRANDSTAND TO REMAIN PROPOSED GRANDSTAND ROOF 8 UNE OF OROmAkr. wA - TOP OF EXISTING LEVEE ORDINARY Mal WATER MARK EXISTING GRAVEL PATH TO REMAIN 30' WONN LEVEE ■....W.....TENANCE EASEMENT FEND UGHt POLE TO REAR. FIRE ACCESS N- AROUND EXISTING METRO UTILITY • EASEMENT 1 NOIONI12:1f18 a —_ •fro N Jr \ tnr bS z C) O 0 FIELD U GHT m\/7"-, z 0 = m z \ \ • \ 7171' ) VMI Iddl lflVd C-) 0 D D C) C-) G•) - n 2 O D LAYOUT 8t_ MATERIALS LEGEND f,---4 f'` 2 ASPHALT PARKING LOT PAVING OVER 4' CRUSHED SURFACING BASE REINFORCED FIREINE ASPHALT PAVING 4 CONCRETE PAVING OVER 2 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE 4' DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK SURFACING SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FEND PUNTING (SEE PLANTTIING PUNS) PLANTING OVER NAIVE SOIL (SEE PUNTING PIONS) CONCRETE CURB 0: GUTTER (EITHER SLOPES TO CURB) CONCRETE BARRER CURB (GUTTER SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB) - -- EXISTING SS EASIIENT — — — FR LANE — — CONSTRUCTION UNIT LINE — PHASE UNIT UNE CHNNUNK FENCE (TYPE & HEIGHT AS NUTTED) ---'0^ PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE (SEE GRADING PUNS) - -'T— EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND FOR EXISTING SITE FEATURES SEE EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY PLANS, SHEETS G2 A 03. FLOOD ELEVATION THE 100 -YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION IS 20.7 AS DEIERMINED BY THE CITY OF TUKWIA 0 20 40 60 SCALE: 1'••20' RECEIVED JUN 05 2003 FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL IIIIIlhIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlhiIII JOB: 10701 11111111111111111111111111111111111 C3 Sheet 7 of 20 • 1671 ;3533 Y / / (199, / /1 / / / / . VI • .1155 / f.E.`e .. / / fr , .1960 !1139/ 13!H 991 • / / '.9; . ,511 nfl / /..- AE Cit / / 59 p'� •-• 1995/ / (191, .VA' / / .ley - / / 10. e72 -rr. 9.9 LIM IT L INNE S ION - HID .vvrfer l5 9 lA TO LAYOUT & MATERIALS LEGEND In "0., AO 41. I� V ((6TA� T0 S.3`Y TQ X993 ' _ qfl - Prah116. 19.71 IAA 10011"ge_ Rat's 1e n i, LL I ' � W 11,9 1 �11 „,,h, ,,,,,. , �22 I .11m 1 . I I ! ;1 4 I .1.,163 /I / /_ I ' 'Q I I ,25, FOR COSTING SHE FEATURES SEE EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAAP1Y • ��,1sj I PLANS, SHEETS G2 & G3. I e99 •^b i, i5 1.1,11 .;:s .@°1 / • • ,269 THE 100 -YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION 6 20.7 AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF 1UKWM ,Y" 2 ASPHALT PARKING LOT PAVING OVER 4' CRUSHED SURFACING BASE REINFORCED FIRELANE ASPHALT PAVING 4 CONCRETE PAVING OVER 2 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE 4' DEPTH (RUSHED ROCK SURFACING SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FI1D ORNAMENTAL PANTING (SEE PLANTING PLANS) PLANTING OVER NATIVE SOIL (SEE PLANTING PANS) CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (GUTTER SLOPES TO CURB) CONCRETE BARRIER CURB (GUTTER SLOPES AWAY FROM CURB) EXISTING SS EASEMENT — — — FIRELANE — — CONSTRUCTION LIMIT LINE — — PHASE LIMIT LINE CHARINX FENCE (TYPE & HEIGHT AS NOTED) —70—. PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE (SEE GRADING PLANS) -- 70 -- EXISTING CONTOUR LINE EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND FLOOD ELEVATION 115/ / /EI 1,11 -11 11 ;1 uurr� N -111 n -1- - PROPOSED FIELD LIGHT LOCATION (TYP.) -1- EXISTING SS EASEMENT 270.90 -1 \06B- 52- 1 \0101{0l.mq Plotted .t: 10u Jim 05 I0: 17:26 2003 PLAN - GRID 'D' LAYOUT & MATERIALS ,, 417 PROD HELD UGH( LOCATION (TV.) 00200 D PI I.: B: WIWI •1'1 11 i�- 0 20 40 60 SCALE 1' =20' MATCHUNE - GRID C - SEE SHEET C3 RECEIVED JUN 0 5 2003 OMINUNIlY oe,am669 l FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL JOB: 10701 IIIIIIIIIItIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILII C4 Shoot 8 of 20 ItoGD file R\OY1111165 \10701= 1 \05B-SE -1 \0701{05.04 Plotted et Too dun 05 IU 1B: 15 2003 sat; / 119 -OA ,A6.55 I / • ,L4.19 °A'139 %In „.55 0150 1151 .179 4.119 L3.10 k 01(6 441(9. 12> 0,9xiss 0 -003 se, .15.55 -oags • 2.* C H FENCE „ PDX) 4.3.10 .520 .053 ‘5,105i5 • 20.15 v.02 • ,L99 • 16.9 0551 ..1135 31 135 • -7°1' \ esSo .095. ge: , 05.55 ievs -.0‘9 31511 ,,,•15.51- ..4. /71 7.75.5' {,5.95 1531 "4,o • •42-\' 3555 1359 .„.4.513 s 300;. 7. 1_":3; RAVE -1.P A T H - 77' \ \-15062 3.73 P°J) • sP I / 0,32 • .09 ' '1553 S .!:51216 59 33.10 “5•55 35511 .119 0551 3119 Ist:a " 452, -.051 /-••"4 /11' • *". o IS 139 ; Ci7,417e chi* Igoe • 1552 ..,53 /1351 3V Ss 1. \ '9 • 4-15,/ - /„.,• 35A3 159 329 -/:1291 / • 00.0 I .,.13 0-CY' Ar07-.‹R 6; ..- ...of/3 -- --.....13.55 \'‘, \ -.•., , r.,- '- • i OP -.... '''''' '7 \ ''.' krD,2.,1( --- -- --- ,,,. •,,... ,:'6,-)540 :. ,"7.,----' N ... -."---ur------ 8'S '0°A ----",\--k.si: -, .., ..., ' ,..... 7:-.,,,,,, ..74, 4,.,....r",---fti,,,,.:71,..,,....11,____,,,, ,.., \ ,, \ 3, \ ,, ,..,..2,1 • „..... • -. -.4,,, ■ , • 1.-,.... : .,,,,,k,„ _:„.--.-------'''' - . , sy'-Pi, fir4,,Isir to..,..02.6, li, ,..;■)?.` 1, ,...., 1.6 -, I 61;‹ ,.).04.1.0,.,c, . . 1.104 I, ( • I V:fili 1'1 j. \ Vea 3433 r5 154 \ 5 of es 15.9 c- 1 139 ‘535 as - 3551 1179 139 as MATCHUNE - GRID D - SEE SHEET C4 13.55 CD 21 z C) 0 z 0 --t m 2 0 73 c) m CD -0 o _< c) -0 M G.) Z 0 -9 3> LAYOUT & MATERIALS LEGEND " MEV r ASPHALT PARIONG LOT PAVING OVER e CRUSHED SURFACING BASE REINFORCED RRELANE ASPHALT PAVING 4 CONCRETE PAVING OVER 2 CRUSHED SURFACING BASE e DEPTH CRUSHED ROCK SURFACING SYNTHETIC TURF SOCCER FIELD ORNAMENTAL PLANTING (SEE PLANTING PLANS) PLANTING (WEB NATNE SOIL (SEE PLANTING PLANS) CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (GUTTER SLOPES TO CURS) CONCRETE BARTER CURB (GUTTER SLOPES AWAY FROM (SRB) casnmc SS EASEMENT. - - - RRELANE - - CONSTRUCTION UNIT UNE - PHASE UNIT UNE - CHAINLINK FENCE (TYPE & HEIGHT AS NOTED) -70-- PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE (SEE GRADING PLANS) -- 70- COSTING CONTOUR UNE EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND FOR Dow SUE FEATURES SEE EXISTING SITE TOPOGRAPHY MANS, SHEETS 02 & G3. FLOOD ELEVATION THE 100-YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION IS 20.7 AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF TUKWILA 0 20 40 60 1mMooll SCALE: 1...20' RECEIVED ■JUN 05 RV mammy ot-vei.owson FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL JOB: 10701 SCALE: 1...20' 11111111111111111111111111111111 C5 Shoot 9 *1 20 30' WIDTH LEVEE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 100' LOW DAPACT PROPOSED FIELD #2 DOSRDRG GRADE 30 25 20 15 10 ENVIRONMENT 8' HIEGHT CHAIN LINK FDRCE 40' RIVER ENVIRONMENT DOSING GRAVEL PATH, 10 REMAIN TOP OF EXISTING LEVEE I I I\ : \ NO CHARGES. PROPOSED WITHIN \ LEVEE MAINIDIANCE. mama. . \ . EXCEPTFOR ADd11ON CF I ��I TNK:VI- 61�RAIN�:K FENC6 ,20 15 30 25 1, I \.. I f 10 EX6ING GRADE ORDINARY HIGH NATTY MAW( Ot LEVEE SECTION NQRI. SCALE : P =20*-; 1ERT. SCALE 1.-5. RECEIVED NN 05 2003 FINAL PERMIT SUBMITTAL e..wewn -ti SUBMITTAL IIIIIIIIIllhIIIlIIIIOIIIlIIllDIII • JOB: 10701 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII [IIIIIIIIIIIIII C6 Sheet 10 of 20 .B10 H � VssurROVION11 - SI1elet. - SIN Nreits.14.7 6., Mx< • • rot 21 It 11 V BO 0 t N, / Cu' c m , • t AT - tT`/S ItATCRIINE — GRID D — SEE SHEET C10 ccs•qisar. PX1 g §14111141111 F! n`g 15; •gassOWSVIIIIN. 1115119W C 11 p. 0 Starfire Sports Soccer Complex at Fort Dent Park Tukwila. Washington GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'A' REVISIONS BY DA1E • 02.21.03 IT231=a1 EMM=MI 000 0221.03 II ijh Ii knaRIE■II .331433131331 • ARM... - Proi113031•034 A11031311 al• 331 13.1 It 333 II X03 • ..3 9. yyy y �'fi�� may`. 8L7M7- - N,amx.i- a s e 13 1lJi . 9 •.mac ... Y MATCHUNE — GRID C — SEE SHEET C9 cc 499'aP" 7 °! i )i 1 ... �� ��I gg9 5I�i 11 15 5111 , ! ! ? 1 •Taaairea- hapax• 1 5 re i i b ii $ 1 11 1. Starfire Sports Soccer Complex at Fort Dent Park Tuk.W, Wuhlnxton GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'B' REVISIONS SAM nue 02z\m /JOT 0+11: 02.2\.03 ,UO2,,,. • 0.C,.„ ..,1,. • a, rt..,.r., 0.,.„ 1Mea II .. r 0 AO pi t1ATCHUNE - GRID B - SEE SHEET C8 V—• (ANVdr00 AVM1IV21 lf1Vd IS ONV 31)1f1VM1IW '00V011-10 Ald3hd0d) .VM- J0 -1HORl (AVM11V21 01310Vd NNJHINON) O318Od2100N1 N83H1NON NOIONIl8f18 I-I (r- •503012!0•11110• Mil IQ Starfire S orta Soccer Complex e7t Tukwila. T1u�hiinpx20n GRADING 8 DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'C' IILVISIONS DUI ro 02.1.03 Fr DAM 02.21.03 .020 Mr e0.,•006 517....•11.23I.0I ...iO e It 1 e an MATCHUNE - GRID A - SEE SHEET C7 J • - elm elm;' ImN rri 0 r ay a.p 0 Ak Starflre S orte Soccer Complex at Tkwila, Wueln�u GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'D' 4 tin 1I •3a•eteer115aa• e1 FIS i �tmlo ■•11111 ••o mo. 000; 02x1.03 R 02]1.03 mcf.X, Filo VO.I.SVP3701 • st...... StIt 11.+1.,1117■31-Ili 3. I. 33 4, 3.3 , t • ,t e-=• t It,ip \ \\ ..t ci. I 9 ,eFT (;7 :.. '- - ; ..,-W. -4 * . ...-- -‘ C"-•-- ----.. _:. E u • ... . • -.1.... 10'. ... ...9.. _. -- i • t • iT•." , ,.. • s .-. . , ; • • ..5 • 6, • - • . t (ANVd1100 AVM11V8 invd IS GNV 31)111VM1111 'ODVOIHD A-1831180J) AVM-30-1H918 (AVM11Vd OIJI0Vd N83H180N) 03180dNOONI Nel3H12,10N NOIONI18118 • 41- et Ic Iw 19 IP 0 Starfire Sport a Soccer Complex at Port Dent Park Tukwila. Washington GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - GRID 'V NIVISIONS PUL 0121.03 Fr rr no, • 0221.03 *MOO Mt VIMMES.X1 - Stmt.. • WA hr.110.001.11. Mot. frk 21 It • O 209 glitRIA 41! R.0111 AN b(aihr 111-41b/ PPrdi tub gi N? mo 051 • Starfire Sports Soccer Complex &UV, Perk RLVISIONS DRAINAGE SECTION & DETAILS DOUS, 0221.03 1=11=',11 1!!!!=311 12W::• Coll: 0221.03 ••■ I • „.. r ' , . r ".-t f , :.-r: - I . 1 . , .., . -,■ , -.- < .. i -1- , - . .,-,,; I I ■t.:: - ' ;‘1C'1. 40:1 '., t,.0.411,' 1 ,,. - ..„•,-".".: ,, , ..,, -,- .' I; % ,, , • • ' ",-.,1 r .- to :,-" ' , ' • . '1;■ •• . . • ■ - . , . . ;•:,.i, Y. liC 'e. • • , .. , ,. — lo I 6 . 7 71i3 . "I L ,. ,\:..,„<",' I r ;, ' -, i .1,),,,,,!..- )-.'14'-- --- .,... „ . . ,:i.,:.•:..:, i ; - :I- , ,• „•,,,,....,. . :: :, . , , : , i . +•-i i ...." t..r,.i' q II •Vi,‘, . 1 i -I , . 1::;'. • --- .,. l', t . ■ % .'. '1 . ''Ilf,';',•i; Ai ' .., - - - - -• I ' r. ' kr P.' . - ,5.,...:;_,-- -- - ------- -. ""' -‘7:— ■. _ i.-1 , '' II' ■ ' t I i I '''' Starfire Sports Soccer Complex at Fort Dent Park Tukwila. Washington UTIUTIES SITE PLAN REVISIONS cot 0121.03 ost. 70, root tie Don cr2_21.03 Pr RIv� GREEN Lt -, — > -- 1 r .. i #r -_ i • vk EXISTING STORNtWAT DETENTION POND SHORELINE ZONE TREE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT gist rem Dud m of ins(4) 1s yp. . .d ■ 2 ' t2 970. Odds= 4 8 1 13. 9'n 9ecidass 4 4 ■ 15 sa ■ 1 r .. i #r -_ i • vk EXISTING STORNtWAT DETENTION POND SHORELINE ZONE TREE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT gist rem Dud m of ins(4) 1s yp. . .d nod meera9' 2 ' t2 970. Odds= 4 8 1 13. 9'n 9ecidass 4 4 15 sa Seldom 4 - 4 .1 1r ma Oeei.sis .. 4 4 ■2 15 04 Deddom 6 12 SODDED LAWN / HYI 19• E . 9edduas 6 6 2 21' Db Deridnss 6 12 1 25 D a Deciduous 6. 8 11 blal �. 1dd isless.11 ded.ss Res e - 66 16- Ella. Dedae. 4 4 17. 910. cone.eees . i 4 i f 19' OS DenEaws 6 - 6 ' 23. 11n Cmeem 6 6 h ; 2S Dia.' Cards= 6 6 5 total tdd ncesameed ew•ns b. s6ded - 26 / NOTES: ,. 1. TREE COMMIES DENOTED WITH AN • ARE TREES THAT WERE PROVIDED 10 11E OTT OF IUKMRA FOR PLANTING N THE 9WIff1JNE ZOIE ELSEMMts 2. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN AND SOmAR IN SDE Alm FORM. 3. ALL 1REFS N HYDROSEED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE MULCH RINGS PER DEMS. 4. ET95TNG 1TEFS DENOTED WITH AN \ / ARE BEING REANNED (APPROX. 16) ' I".. SHORELINE ZONE PLANTING LEGEND I KUS 0 A: eis>aa�ea _ Bded mote 1S w F -1Dx 2F 4... neteeed m . 6„eM1 669 Ia 4 2Cmh vs Or) �` Ibedo ge nendee9 Dagkn R 4-0 6 1s m ;WSW i0i *aa 24 (3y PLANTING LEGEND — OUTSIDE OF SHORELINE TREES emu, O. ...9 dssbsv mqi S R4 14' -/6'm. melna A, e,s.. BM b. m ! aea 819 l l • &a& k 4 �` Ibedo ge nendee9 Dagkn R 4-0 6 1s m BM SI 4 lr..h D SHRUBS _ owned � _ _ Rumlbea�mu .� �. � °""01..- am � Lose s Ws R M 25 MG 666661 6' 6 666 oesa� 117 SODDED LAWN / HYI OS�NG _ — _ SOBBm 116E lose a' IAEE •, . a: SOCCER REED /45A73 at. Ya;� f, 'i Wm Dm l IA1BW6 14317 a2. .4:.....';',:: i SFIDm um/ 4es BY A7 . CONSITILCTCSI L�710 V. NOTES: 1. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE NURSERY GROIN AND SIMILAR IN SZE AND FDR•L 2. ALL 1REES IN 'VENOMS) AREAS 51NLL RECENE MULCH RINGS PER DETAILS 3. EXISING 1 S DEN= WLIFL AN v ARE BEING REMOVED (APPROX. 72) 0 40 SO 120 • GRAPHIC SCALE CONSTRUCTION SET .1.:Y.41ss - -m low ......_ a -.- .....a 01111111. 8 s 8 8 JOB: 1 0703 SCALE: - NOTED 11 L1.1 Shoot 23 of 24 Melia File VallOSSIOFel • Stalin. SEW Persit,M1-101. Kew. leg 001 • i : n Mil Starfireerusk.u.Lorrt D ta. Soccer Pork t neVIIIONS WI BY Planting Plan • OWL: 02.21A3 =MEN 12==•1 rr 000 0121.03 BRUCE AK DEES& NKr ASSOCIATES =cm=