Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPA E97-0026 - CITY OF TUKWILA - TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTER DEMOLITION AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS REMOVAL (RIVERTON PARK)OLD TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTER RIVERTON PARK DEMOLITION OF BUILDING & REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS 4101 S. 131ST ST. E97-0026 E97-0026 (Addendum to EPA DNS) September 21, 1999 Page 2 • This Addendum to the Determination of Non -Significance (E97-0026) is final and signed this 21st day of September, 1999. Steve Lancaster, Responsible Official City of Tukwila (206) 431-3670 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Tukwila, Washington 98188 City of Tukwila John W Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director September 21, 1998 Gary L. VanDusen Master of the Lodge Delta -White Center Lodge No. 172 Masonic Hall 13034 41st South Seattle, Washington 98168 RE: Addendum to SEPA Determination for Old Community Center Demolition at 4101 South 131st Street, Tukwila Tukwila File No. E97-0026 Dear Mr. VanDusen: On October 2, 1997 a SEPA Determination of Non -Significance ("DNS") was issued for the Old Community Center demolition, referenced above. A request for an addendum to that DNS was approved on September 21, 1999. A copy of that approved addendum is enclosed. Please be advised that under TMC 21.04.280(b) if you wish to file an appeal, you must do so in writing (addressed to the Department of Community Development) within 14 days of the date of that decision. Sincerely, \DTDcral•—. Deborah Ritter Assistant Planner Enclosure cc: Washington Department of Ecology, SEPA Division w/enclosures Control No. Epic File No. Fee: Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Riverton Park 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Parks and Recreation Department 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Paul Surek, Parks Superintendent Parks and Recreation Department City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 206-433-1869 4. Date checklist prepared: September 16, 1999 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Begin spreading topsoil and hydroseeding Fall, 1999. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Possible future picnic shelter. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Land Altering Permit through City of Tukwila Department of Public Works. . 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposal and should not be summarized here. The park site is 4.8 acres. It was formerly the Tukwila Community Center and Southgate School. The proposed passive use park will have approximately 100,000 square feet of irrigated turf, a paved walking path, and play structure. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The project is located in the City of Tukwila on 4101 S. 131st Street. Section 15, Township 23, Range 4. 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? Considered Class II, but work will not involve sloped area greater than 6 percent. Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? 6 percent c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No, typical valley soil. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Addition of 1000 cubic yards of topsoil from local source. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. Very little, site is flat. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 9.5 percent. Walking path. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Silt fencing around job site. Hydroseeding application. The forest fringe occurs downhill of all oundaries. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. None. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: None. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. None. Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. None. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Any runoff will flow into the forest fringe bordering the park. Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: None. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other X shrubs X grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Weed removal. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Preserve and enhance existing landscape with shrubs and decidious and evergreen trees. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:. Songbirds. Mammals: None Fish: None Other: None b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. No. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity for irrigation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: None. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. None. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area zvhich may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Minimal traffic noise. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Construction--irrgation trenching and grading. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Work to occure between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant site. Adjacent properties are single family houses. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. No. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? LDR f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? LDR g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Considered Class II, but work will not involve sloped area greater than 6 percent. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? None. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: N/ A Page 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? None. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: N/A 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? No structures. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. Page 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? N/ A c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? N/ A d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: N/ A 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Playground and turf area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No, it will enhance the recreational opportunities by adding a new play structure, walking path and irrigated turf area. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. Page 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Macadam and 131st. b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Within three blocks. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? 17 existing spaces. This project would not eliminate any parking spaces. Page 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). None. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. None. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Unknown. Most park users will walk to the park, not drive. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: None. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. No. Page 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Electricity - Seattle City Light. Water - Highline Water District C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature:, 5�,r.cL Date Submitted: q I a.o j q cf. Page 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objectives of the proposal? To provide an additional park for the citizens of Tukwila. By adding an additional 1,000 cubic yards of topsoil, the park will be provided with a healthy and flourishing irrigated turf area. A walking path and play structure are also a part of this project. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? Hydroseeding turf area over existing rocky soil with questionable results. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Add necessary topsoil in keeping with the objectives of number 1 above. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? No. 5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None. Page 17 Ir, AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION O Notice of Public Hearing ereby declare that: Determination of Non- significance O Notice of Public Meeting fl Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance OBoard of Adjustment Agenda E Determination of Significance Packet and Scoping Notice LIBoard of Appeals Agenda LJ Notice of Action Packet Li Planning Commission Agenda E Official Notice Packet fl Short Subdivision Agenda fl Other Packet O Notice of Application for []Other Shoreline Management Permit flShoreline Management Permit was mailed to each of the following addresses on 1(il`)-1(V) (SC -00-6A6 5-GmPAQ1- r� UC( -X, Name of Projects File Number q-1— (`^:Q.0 Signatur 111 CHECKLISTSNVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/SHORELINE IT MAILINGS ( ) U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ( ) FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ( ) DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE ( ( FEDERAL AGENCIES ( ) U.S., ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ( ) U.S. DEPT OF H.U.D. WASHINGTON STATE AGENCIES OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT DEPT NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR DEPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT OF FISHERIES & WILDLIFE ( ) DEPT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV. ( ) DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SHORELANDS DIV (DV_ DEPT OF ECOLOGY, SEPA DIVISION* ( ) OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL * SEND CHECKLIST WITH DETERMINATIONS * SEND SITE MAPS WITH DECISION RING COUNTY AGENCIES K.C. PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEV. BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD FIRE DISTRICT #11 FIRE DISTRICT #2 K.C. WATER POLLUTION CNTRL SEPA OFFCL S CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT TUKWILA LIBRARIES RENTON LIBRARY KENT LIBRARY CITY OF SEATTLE LIBRARY U S WEST SEATTLE CITY LIGHT WASHINGTON NATURAL GAS HIGHLINE WATER DISTRICT SEATTLE WATER DEPARTMENT TCI CABLEVISION OLYMPIC PIPELINE ( ) K.C. DEPT OF PARKS ( ) HEALTH DEPT ( ) PORT OF SEATTLE ( ) BUILDING & LAND DEV DIV SEPA INFO CENTER ( ) K.C. TRANSIT DIVISION - SEPA OFFICIAL SCHOOLS/LIBRARIES HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT K C PUBLIC LIBRARY SEATTLE MUNI REF LIBRARY SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT RENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT VAL-VUE SEWER DISTRICT WATER DISTRICT #20 WATER DISTRICT #125 CITY OF RENTON PUBLIC WORKS RAINIER VISTA SKYWAY CITY AGENCIES KENT PLANNING DEPT TUKWILA CITY DEPARTMENTS: ( ) PUBLIC WORKS ( ) FIRE ( ) POLICE ( ) FINANCE ( ) PLANNING ( ) BUILDING ( ) PARKS & REC. ( ) MAYOR OTHER RENTON PLANNING DEPT CITY OF SEA -TAC CITY OF BURIEN TUKWILA PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS TUKWILA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY OF SEATTLE - SEPA INFO CENTER SEATTLE OFFICE OF MGMNT PLANNING LOCAL AGENCIES ( ) PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL ( 4. P.S. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY ( ) SW K C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ( ) MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DUWAMISH INDIAN TRIBE ( ) DAILY JOURNAL OF COMMERCE ( ) VALLEY DAILY NEWS 2/10/97 C:WP51DATA\CHKLIST METRO ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DIV. OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL 5,000 GSF OR MORE RESIDENTIAL 50 UNITS OR MORE RETAIL 30,000 GSF OR MORE MEDIA ( ) HIGHLINE TIMES c)44. SEATTLE TIMES . CITY OF TUKWILA DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (DNS) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: DEMOLITION OF 28,000 S.F. BUILDING AND REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS. PROPONENT: RANDY BERG, TUk;W-ILA, PUBL,I:C WORKS- , LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING: STREET ,ADDRESS, ADDRESS: 4101'-S 131. ST PARCEL NO: 734060`-08'84`` SEC/TWN/RNG; LEAD AGENCY:',:' CITY OF TUKWILA The Ci tv has determined that ,,• they, propoc a 1 does not have a 'probab l e i gn i f leant adverse, impact bn ther`ernv i ronment . An envi ronmenta1 r impact statementv (EIS) is =not reyu`irecl under RCW 43.21e. 030c2) (c)'. This decision was made atter'revi,'ew of,acompleted environmental,,� check 1 ist and other intor-matii on ion, t i 1with the lead agency ThiF, • information i s ,avai 1ab4e „to,,',the !Pub •. on, request. FILE NO: E97-0026 . ****:4**k:ak:• 4**kAc1 ,**:4*,**kk*•kz44*ekkk, ,****•kk**444**** * * * *4 * * * * * **!k***i4;k**•k**** This dete.rm i nat:i or 1997. -- is f ) na l and signed..., this, ,; 2 A d a v' o f [ Steve Lanca;s'ter, Responsible Off i s iia 1 City of TuI w i l,a; (_206) 431-3670 6300 Southcene.r` Bou 1 e;vard-,: ,. Tukwila, WA\''9'8188' Copies of the procedures for SERA appeals are ava i101 awi th the Department of Commun'i ty Deve 1 opment City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director ADDENDUM TO SEPA DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE Dated October 2, 1997 File No. E97-0026 Old Community Center Demolition (-aka- Riverton Park) 4101 South 131st Street Project Description: On October 2, 1997, a Determination of Non -Significance was issued in connection with the demolition of the former Tukwila Community Center under Tukwila File No. E97- 0026). Extremely rocky soils were discovered after demolition. In order to insure the success of turf proposed for that site, 1,000 cubic yards of soil will be required. Prior to building demolition, the original estimate was 50 cubic yards. The purpose of the proposed addendum is to reflect the change in the amount of fill dirt required. Agencies with Jurisdiction: None. Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth After demolition of the existing building, the soils beneath the building site were found to be extremely rocky. In order to insure the success of turf that will be planted on that site, 1,000 cubic yards of soil is required. Prior to the demolition, the original estimate was 50 cubic yards. • Environmental Health The delivery of 1,000 cubic yards of soils will generate approximately 50 trips over a period of 2 days. Due the dense quality of the imported soil (comprised of organic matter and sand) no dust is expected to be generated during transit. Water will be used on site, as needed, to control dust during soil deposition. Recommendation: Approval of Addendum to Determination of Non -Significance. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director MEMORANDUM To: Steve Lancaster From: Michael Jenkins P) Date: October 2, 1997 Re: E97-0026, SEPA review of application by City of Tukwila Public Works Department for demolition of old Tukwila Community Center, 4101 S. 130th. Project Description: This SEPA review is for demolition of the former Tukwila Community Center, 4101 S. 130th St. The project includes the demolition of a 28,000 square foot building, the removal of approximately 20,000 square feet of asphalt/concrete paving and the removal of two - 5,000 gallon underground storage tanks. Agencies with jurisdiction: None Summary of Primary Impacts: • Earth Site has a 15% slope at the east end of property towards Macadam Road, with remainder of site relatively flat. No unstable soils on site. Project will include cut and fill of approximately 50 cubic yards in part of demolition area. Approximately 1% of parcel will have impervious surface after demolition. Applicant will submit erosion plan if needed. • Air Exhaust from construction vehicles and dust generated may occur during demolition as well as from demolition/asphalt removal process. A permit will be required at the time of application for Tukwila's Demolition Permit from Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency (PSAPCA). • Water No impact on surface or ground waters. Existing storm drainage system and roof drainage will be removed during demolition of structures and impervious surfaces. Permit from Tukwila will be required for capping of sewer and water lines, to be coordinated with Val Vue Sewer District and Water District #125. 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite #100 ° Tukwila, Washington 98188 ° (206) 431-3670 0 Fax (206) 431-3665 E97-0026 • 1 SEPA Checklist - City of Tukwila Public Works Demolition of old Tukwila Community Center - 4101 S. 130th October 2, 1997 • Plants Some existing trees and shrubs near building may be removed during demolition, with future park development resulting in removal of additional existing vegetation. Areas will be seeded where appropriate. • Animals No known species or migration routes nearby. • Energy/Natural Resources Gasoline or other fuels may be used for machinery during construction and semi-annual maintenance. • Environmental Health Some short term noise will be generated during construction time period, lasting between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. No long term noise impacts are anticipated. • Land/Shoreline Use Building is former Tukwila Community Center, currently vacant. Site is also used for recreation facilities and is planned to be developed as a park in the future. A 28,000 square foot building is located on the site which will be demolished. Parcel is zoned Low Density Residential and is not in an environmentally sensitive area. • Housing No housing is proposed nor will development reduce housing. • Aesthetics No structures are proposed. • Light and Glare No impacts. • Recreation All existing recreational uses at this site were moved to new Community Center, approximately 1/2 mile away. Passive recreation areas and play equipment will remain following demolition, along with the construction of new recreational amenities. Use of the existing playfield may be impacted during demolition of the building and removal of concrete/paving areas. E97-0026 • • SEPA Checklist - City of Tukwila Public Works Demolition of old Tukwila Community Center - 4101 S. 130th October 2, 1997 • Historic/Cultural Preservation No known places or landmarks. • Transportation Access to site is on S. 130 St., a residential street. Pedestrian access is available from S. 130th St., E. Marginal and Macadam. 35 parking stalls will be eliminated with 14 left on S. 130th after project is completed. • Public Services Proposed development will not impact or require specific public services. • Utilities No impact Recommendation: DNS 111 SEP -18-97 THU 03:34 PMOUTHTOWNE AUTO REBUILD 1.206 242 8459 P.02 Michael J. West 18047 Military Rd. S. Seattle, WA 98188 Gary L. VanDusen MAIL AODRESS W0R81iIPFUL MASTER PElta-Phittt center Ll ,,se u_ 112, & -A{_ MASONIC HALL - 13034 - 41st SOUTH SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98168 September 19, 1997 City of Tukwila Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Attn: Michael Jenkins Ref: E97-0026 demolition 4101 S. 139th old Tukwila Community Center. The Delta -White Center Masonic Lodge is located directly across the street from the old Tukwila Community Center. We are concerned with the present and fitture parking availability. The Lodge has limited parking in front of our building. The parking for Lodge activities, depends on street parking and parking at the old Community Center. The availability of the parking at the old Community Center, allowed off street parking during evening events at the Lodge. This diminished the need to use side streets in proximity to the Lodge. With the possible elimination of public parking at the old Community Center site, it will increase the need for parking on local residential streets. The impact to local citizens will become a future issue for the City, Without a plan for future development of the site or a timeline for any constriction of the same it becomes a concern for the Lodge. The Lodge requests that the City take into account for interim and long-range parking for this area of the City. Thank you. Sincerely, Gary L. VanDusen Master of the Lodge RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA SEP 1 81997 PERMIT CENTER • AFFIDAVIT OF DISTRIBUTION I, \ 0 cf-1,C PA k.) IvrN - t Lin hereby declare that: L Notice of Public Hearing ❑ Notice of Public Meeting OBoard of Packet Board of Packet I I Planning Packet Adjustment Agenda Appeals Agenda Commission Agenda fl Short Subdivision Agenda Packet IlNotice of Application for Shoreline Management Permit flShoreline Management Permit Determination of Non- significance LJ Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance Determination of Significance and Scoping Notice Notice of Action Official Notice Other was mailed to each of the following addresses on Name of ProjS ignatur File Numbeq - y • • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF APPLICATION DATED SEPTEMBER 5,1997, The following applications have been submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and decision. FILE NUMBERS: E97-0026 (SEPA Application) APPLICANT: City of Tukwila LOCATION: 4101 S. 139th - old Tukwila Community Center PROPOSAL: Demolition of the old Tukwila Community Center, to. include demolition of a 28,000 square foot building, 20,000 square foot parking area and removal of two - 5,000 gallon underground tanks OTHER REQUIRED PERMITS: Demolition Permit PSAPCA Demolition Permit These files are available for review at the Department of Community Development, 6300 Southcenter Blvd., #100, Tukwila, WA. Please call (206) 431-3670 to ensure that the file(s) will be available. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT You can submit comments on this application. You must submit your comments in writing to the Department of Community Development by 5:00 p.m. on September 19, 1997. If you have questions about this proposal contact Michael Jenkins, the Planner in charge of this file. Anyone who submits written comments will become parties of record and will be notified of any decision on this project. APPEALS You may request a copy of any decision or obtain information on your appeal rights by contacting the Department at 431-3670. A decision from the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. The Department will provide you with information on appeals if you are interested. DATE OF APPLICATION: NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: NOTICE OF APPLICATION: August 8, 1997 August 28, 1997 September 5, 1997 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 I-2" wn-rEgMCr, K • Rervo r 5. 131sT. STI r `P ',-V;,- r,61)07;/- 5EHCw �r4�� IM U:Id /= • $1-A5 •'r-l_tA+w frcorM1lcrf� " KCMCvl. (!:41114 —. rAJe ,-leer . \ • \ (J1ll pREN 5 RA/ AREA -0 Pemil4 `.. J(‘‘)gC IL* 1 xllROVND r>� wr.- STogK,J Arley,CCma • 1 jov4LI `zN a o m 3 j 5, 100 KEFIOV hvGF-fel; / ' • FX, - 4e iF1'TIG 'r?I-IG go- rum rev 4, RE,-,cvtD c$ .FILA -CP wt -,-t6 HHD TigemPk/et-tall- I l- t — .._._ iz Movc u-11 r1Y Pot -e TP.iekKI U,JNSTURgEP i DeMOLrhrll AcTivt'fr- FL _ e -5 j OLD ILIKI4lILt CoMMULII��C 41t; r l,cY�TED A -r 4101 . 0, 131sT, 5T. DEM'U1-1014. PLA1,4 Pv\w14 6- R.F ERG AUG,, I°1°17 GI-r-raF"rJK1,d1LA PUgLIG WGKKS (4,36,e) 501ATi-lcz1-I-re2 i i_vD. CITY OF TUKWILA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 AFFIDAVIT OF INSTALLATION AND POSTING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION SIGNS) State of Washington County of King City of Tukwila I 1D7'. �6elsf (Print Name) understand that Section 18.104.110 of the Tukwila Municipal Code requires me to post the property no later than fourteen (14) days following the issuance of the Notice of Completeness. I certify that on /. P-1�7>?$E2 5 / T7the Public Notice Board(s) in accordance with Section 18.104.110 and other applicable guidelines were posted on the property located at 4)0/ So- /3157- STT so as to be clearly seen from each right -of -way providing primary vehicular access to the property for application file number E17 - c5;e2Z Affiant pplicant Sige) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this X71`—"day of ; 19 77 (2,4, NOTARaUBLIC in and for the StateWashington of residing at My commission expis on 5, ti: • City of Tukwila John W. Rants, Mayor Department of Community Development Steve Lancaster, Director NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION August 28, 1997 Randy Berg City of Tukwila Public Works Department 6300 Southcenter Blvd., Suite 100 Tukwila, WA 98188 RE: SEPA Application for demolition of old Tukwila Community Center, 4101 S. 130th File No. E97-0023 Dear Randy: Your SEPA application, on behalf of City of Tukwila, for the demolition of the old Tukwila Community Center, 4101 S. 130th, has been found to be complete on August 28, 1997 for the purposes of meeting state mandated time requirements. I have been assigned to this project. The next step is for you to install the notice board on the site within 14 days of the date of this letter. I am enclosing information on how to install the sign with your application packet. Also, you must obtain a laminated copy of the Notice of Application to post on the board. This notice is available at DCD. After installing the sign, you need to return the signed Affidavit of Posting to the our office and you will receive the Notice of Application and Site Plan. This determination of complete application does not preclude the ability of the City to require that you submit additional plans or information, if in our estimation such information is necessary to ensure the project meets the substantive requirements of the City or to complete the review process. I will be contacting you soon to discuss this project. If you wish to speak to me sooner, feel free to call me at 431-3685. Sincerely, `Grii LAG" Y �� lL Michael Jenkins Assistant Planner cc: Reviewing City Departments c:\msoffice...sepa\9726comp.doc 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • (206) 431-3670 • Fax (206) 431-3665 CITY OFIDUKWILA Department of Community Development 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 Telephone: (206) 431-3670 • CITYECEIVED OF TUKWILA AUG 0 $ 9�9� PERMIT CENTER SEPA APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR STAFF USE ONLY Planner: File Number: 17 , dQ z6 Receipt Number: Cross-reference files: Applicant notified of incomplete application: 97yoo5( Applicant .notified of complete application:.. Notice of application issued: NAME OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: DetrtcL-I - ri < l LA G2,r.thl u lt G�rt� :B. LOCATION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: (address and accessors parcel number(s)) Quarter: 4 t4 Section: 15 Township: 23 Range: 4 (This information may be found on your tax statement) PROJECT DESCRIPTION:' t%'F.toLI--jop, op 28,4' A5x-1A-feb PHvI PUCANT: NAME: C11-'{ 0 �UK]4ILA (01-1-rilfi'r. gm -toy ADDRESS: 4•363o '% ii -1 ,-'-t PHONE: 43Z, -,I71 �44) SIGNATURE:: LV DATE: . 7J %q17 CITY OFATUKWILA Departmer bf Community Development • n►,�AECE►VED 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Tukwila, WA 98188 ®rru,►u Telephone: (206) 431-3670 NO 0 e 19.97 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (SEPA)APPLICATIONI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS To submit for SEPA review, provide the items listed above to the Planning Division at 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Room 100. 6 copies of the completed and signed environmental checklist. You may use the City's pre-printed form or you may re -type the questions on your computer. If you choose to re -type the form into your computer, be sure to do so accurately. Mistakes oromissions will increase the review time. lam' sets of the full size plans needed to clearly describe the proposed action. r71'1' One set of plans reduced to 8.5" x 11". CZI For copiessupporting of su ortin studies. 1714 Orbe copy of the checklist application. One set of mailing labels for all properties 500' from the subject property. (See address label worksheet.) ❑ $325 filing fee. COMPLETING THE CHECKLIST The checklist contains several pages of questions which you are asked to answer. It covers a comprehensive set of topics. As a result, several of the questions may not apply to your project. If a particular question does not apply, simply write N/A underneath. HOWEVER, be aware that many questions apply despite appearing not to. Care needs to be taken in reading and answering the questions to ensure the appropriate response is provided. It is important that accurate and clear information be provided. You may not know. all of the answers. Answer each question to the best of your ability. If we find an answer to be insufficient, the City may contact you to ask for more information. Sometimes, after reviewing the checklist, the City will ask you provide additional studies or information. Commonly requested information includes traffic analysis, site topography, soils studies and tree surveys. Cool No. Epic File No. e' 7 • car' ZC. Fee: Receipt No. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed, project, if applicable: RECEIVED CITY OF TUKWILA AUG A $ 1997 PERMIT CEDER Domolition of the Old Tukwila Community Center, and Underground Tank Removal. 2. Name of applicant: City of Tukwila, Public Works Department. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 6300 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Tel. No. 433-0179 contact person: Randy Berg 4. Date checklist prepared: August 1, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Tukwila. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Demolition to begin when permits are issued, completion in about 45 days from commencement. Underground tank removal will begin when demolition is completed. Timing depends on findings of soil samples around the old tanks. If no cntamination is detected tank removal should follow within 30 days of completion of demolition. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes, the site is planned for use as a municipal park in the future, with baseball diamond, play equipment and other amenities. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. Level one hazardous substance site assessment has been completed for the site (attached). Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIRT 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal. Demolition permit, and suuccessful completion of asbestos abatement project. When demolition is completed the process to remove two large underground fuel storage tanks will follow. Permits will be applied for through the Tukwila Fire Department, and the soil will be tested for possible remediation. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Section E requires a complete description of the objectives and alternates of your proposal and should not be summarized here. Demolition and off site disposal of +/-28,000 square foot structure, and demolition and disposal off site of approximately 20,000 square feet of asphalt and concrete paving. Removal of two 5,000 gallon underground fuel storage tanks. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. 4101 South 130th Street, Tukwila WA 98188, all laying within northwest quater of section 15-23-4 13. Does the proposal lie within an area designated on the City's Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan Map as environmentally sensitive? No Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: The area of the demoltion is nearly flat. The overallsite slopes away at the east end toward Macadam road b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 15% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Soil is sandy loam at surface and gravelly below +/-two feet. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Project will includ about 50 yard of fill where building demolitiion of boiler room will leave a low area. The site of demolition will be graded smooth at completion and seeded with grass. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. The area of the site where the demolition will occur is flat and no erosion is anticipated. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? About 1% of site will remained paved when demolition is completed. Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKT h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: An approved errosion contral plan will be included if required. All areas of bare dirt after demolition will be seeded with grass seeds. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Some dust can be expected during demolition. The area will be watered to b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. no. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: none. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. no. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. no. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. n/ a Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKST • 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. no. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. no. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. no. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. no. 2) Describe waste materials that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. none. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Existing storm drainage system and roof drainage system will be removed and water will be left to perk throgh pervious surfaces. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. no. Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKT • d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: none. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing trees and shrubs located near the building may be lost during the demolition process. Future park development will clear additional strees and shrubs. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Areas of bare dirt will be seeded at the conclusion of the demolition. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:. deciduous trees: alder, maple, aspen, other Mammals: evergreen trees: fir, cedar, pine, other Fish: shrubs Other: grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eel grass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some existing trees and shrubs located near the building may be lost during the demolition process. Future park development will clear additional strees and shrubs. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Areas of bare dirt will be seeded at the conclusion of the demolition. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds or animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds:. hawk, songbirds, migratory water fowl, other: Mammals: raccoons, squirrels, small rodents, other: Fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. none. Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKOT • c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. no. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: none. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The demolition will result in the removal of electrical service. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. no. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: none. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. no. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. n/ a. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: none. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKKT Some traffic noise can be expected in the neighborhood. 2) What types and levels of ,noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Some short term noise as the result of construction activities. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Hours of construction will be limited to 8:OOam to 6:OOpm. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Vacant site of the old Tukwila Community Center and neighborhood park. g. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. no c. Describe any structures on the site. 28,000 square foot old Tukwila Community Center was converted from a one story elementary school. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Yes, the 28,000 square foot structure will be demolished. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Low density residential. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Lop density residential. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? n/ a h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. no. Page 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKT 0 i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? none. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? none. , k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: none. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: none. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing? none. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. none. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: none. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? n/a b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? none. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: none. 11. Light and Glare Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKKT a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? none. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? none. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? none. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: none. 12. Recreation a. What designed and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The site offers passive recreational opportunities and also offers childrens play equipment. This proposal will not effect these items. The structure proposed for demolition includes a weight training room and small gymnasium. These uses have been replaced at the new Tukwila Community Center located about 1/3 of a mile to the north. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Yes the old community center did offer recreational opportunity which is now offered at the new community center. The demolition of the old structure will clear the way .for construction of a baseball diamond and other recreational amenities, so will eventually increase recreational opportunity in the area. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: none. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. no. Page 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK.' • b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. none known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: none. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. Vehicular access to the site is from 'South 130th Street, which is a residential street. Pedestrian access to the site is from Macadsm and East Marginal way, as well as from south 130th St. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? n/a c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The paving demoltion will eliminate about 35 parking stalls, while about 14 will be left along 130th after the paving demolition is complete. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). no. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. no. f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. n/a g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: none. Page 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIAT • 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. no. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. none 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. n/a C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted:/‘'7 8714 17 Page 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK T • D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR ALL PROJECT AND NON PROJECT PROPOSALS The objectives and the alternative means of reaching the objectives for a proposal will be helpful in reviewing the foregoing items of the Environmental Checklist. This information provides a general overall perspective of the proposed action in the context of the environmental information provided and the submitted plans, documents, supportive information, studies, etc. 1. What are the objectives of the proposal? Remove an old, unused and substandard structure. Removal will clear the way to develope a new municipal park on the site. 2. What are the alternative means of accomplishing these objectives? None known. 3. Please compare the alternative means and indicate the preferred course of action: Preferred course of action is to demolish the old facility. 4. Does the proposal conflict with policies of the Tukwila Comprehensive Land Use Policy Plan? No. 5. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce the conflict(s) are: None. Page 13 • Asbestos and Lead-based Paint Survey Review and Inventory Tukwila Community Center 4101 South 131st Street, Tukwila, WA Performed by: David L. Abrass, General Manager Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc. 6510 Southcenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 PRE #11274 Date Prepared: 5/30/97 CITY OF TIUKWILA PERMIT CENTER Table of Contents Section 1.0 Scope of Work 1 Section 2.0 Asbestos -containing Materials (ACM) Summary 2 Table 2.1 Summary of Asbestos -Containing Materials 2 Table 2.1 Summary of Asbestos -containing Materials (continued) 3 Section 3.0 Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimate 4 Section 4.0 Lead Survey Narrative 5 Appendix A Lead -and Asbestos Samples Summaries Appendix B Sample Location Drawings Appendix C Laboratory Analysis Data Sheets Appendix D Inspector Cetifications Section 1.0 Scope of Work On May 16th, 1997, Mr. David L. Abrass and Ms. Sheila Philips of Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc. (PRE) performed an asbestos and lead-based paint survey inventory of the City of Tukwila Community located at 4101 South 131st Street, Tukwila, WA. Field inspection and data collection was based on the following Scope of Work 1) Review the existing asbestos survey, including a comprehensive visual inspection of each property, to determine the level of compliance with current applicable regulations. 2) Where necessary, provide bulk sampling and analysis of suspect asbestos -containing materials not identified in the existing surveys. 3) Perform a visual inspection of the subject property to identify and inventory all accessible suspect lead-based paints. 4) Perform Lead Check swab sampling of all suspect lead-based paints. 5) Perform chip sampling of all paints found to show a positive Lead Check indication and subsequent laboratory analysis utilizing Atomic Absorption (AA) methodology (10% of all negative Lead Check indications will be analyzed as a quality assurance measure). 06/02/97 PAGE 1 •J Section 2.0 Asbestos -containing Materials (ACM) Summary Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc. (PRE) reviewed the asbestos containing materials survey inventory conducted by Law/Crandall, Inc. in December of 1992 in conjunction with a visual inspection of the subject property. The review included a comparative evaluation of suspect asbestos -containing materials identified in the Law/Crandall survey and those present in the facility on the date of the visual inspection. PRE also reviewed the survey's sampling methodology and, as necessary, collected additional bulk samples to ensure compliance with Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Regulation Article III. PRE recommends a minimum of three samples per suspect asbestos -containing material, regardless of material type, if the material exceeds 100 square feet in area. Quantities of identified asbestos -containing materials were also confirmed during the inspection. Table 2.1 contains a summary of asbestos -containing materials identified by Law/Crandall including material description, location, quantity, asbestos percentage and type. Table 2.1 Summary of Asbestos -Containing Materials Material Description Material Location Quantity Asbestos % and Type 12' x 12" Green vinyl floor tile and mastic Kindergarten, Classrooms 2 and 4, Craft Room, Weight Room, and Kitchen 6,000 Square Feet Tile. 7% Chrysotile Mastic: 20% Chrysolite 9' x 9' Brown vinyl floor the and mastic Staff Room 300 Square Feet Tile: 4% Chrysolite Mastic: 30% Chrysotile 9' x 9" Green vinyl floor file and mastic Classroom 3 1,000 Square Feet Tile: 3% Chrysotile Mastic: 7% Chrysotile 9" x 9' White vinyl floor tile and . mastic Gymnasium 2,700 Square Feet Tile: 2% Chrysotile Mastic: 20% Chrysotile Pipe Fitting Insulation (on 4' Fiberglass -insulated straight run piptng) Senior Services Kitchen 20 Fittings 4% Amosite Pipe Fitting Insulation (on 4' b T Magnesium insulated dirt run ppm Boiler Room 40 Fittings 5% Chrysotile, 30% Amosite Pipe Insulation (4' to 7) Boiler Room 400 Linear Feet 25% Chrysolite, 20% Amosite Bailer Insulation Boiler Room 300 Square Feet 2% Chrysotile, 33%Amosite Hot-water Tank Insulation Boiler Room 150 Square Feet 2% Chrysotile, 33% Amosite Cement Asbestos Board (wall assemblies) Kindergarten, restrooms, corridor, classrooms, and kitchen 11,000 Square Feet . 25-3596 Chrysolite 06/02/97 PAGE 2 •.J Table 2.1 Summary of Asbestos -containing Materials (continued) Material Description Material Location Quantity Asbestos % and Tpye Cement asbestos Board (ceiling N) Kitchen 600 Square Feet 2536'% Chrysotile Cement Asbestos Board (exterior siding) Gable ends of buildings 900 Square Feet 2535% Chrysotile PRE confirmed the existence of all asbestos -containing materials identified by Law/Crandall. However, some discrepancies in material quantities were noted. PRE identified 25 additional asbestos -containing insulated pipe fittings in the attic mechanical room and 20 additional asbestos -containing insulated pipe fittings were identified in the Boiler Room Total fittings is estimated at 45 in the attic mechanical room and 60 fittings in the Boiler Room. PRE's sample analysis showed the presence of asbestos in a powdery layer of pipe insulation identified within the layered paper insulation on 5° piping in the Boiler Room. The layered paper insulation was described as non - asbestos -containing by Law/Crandall. The identification of the asbestos -containing layer in this insulation increases the linear footage of asbestos -containing pipe insulation by 10 linear feet for a total of 410 linear feet. PRE's sample analysis showed the presence of asbestos in a decorative cove base identified in the main condor of the subject property's southem section (outside of the Gymnasium). This material was not sampled in the main conidor by Law/Crandall and was therefore not represented as asbestos -containing in the in their survey. PRE estimates approximately 250 linear feet of this material is present in the corridor. Decorative cove base and associated mastic were confirmed as non asbestos -containing in other areas of the subject property. 06/02/97 PAGE 3 Section 3.0 Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimate The following abatement cost estimates are based on current industry averages. Actual abatement costs may vary depending on the logistics of the removal of material. The estimate is meant only as a guideline to assist in the selection of an abatement contractor. It is in no way intended to serve as, or replace, a comprehensive abatement specification. Estimates include permitting, removal and disposal. Vinyl Floor Tile and Mastic Pipe Insulation Pipe Fitting Insulation Boiler Insulation Hot-water Tank Insulation Cement Asbestos Board 10,000 Square Feet 410 Linear Feet 105 Fittings 300 Square Feet 150 Square Feet 12,500 Square Feet solson. immumbisi. $9111111111101.. 3101001 t TOTAL $rte 06/02/97 PAGE 4 Section 4.0 Lead Survey Narrative Thirty-seven (37) swab samples were taken of suspect paints identified in/on the subject property. Of those, two (2) tested positive for the presence of lead. A total of nine (9) chip samples were taken for analysis. The HUD Guideline for lead-based paint is 1.0 mg/cm2 or 5,000 µg/g (0.5% by wieght). Those paints found to contain more than 0.5% lead must be treated as a lead-based paint. Of those analyzed, two samples were found to contain lead in excess of .5%. Those were as follows: • Yellow paint on a sheet -rock substrate identified on walls in the office adjacent to the Kindergarten Room. • Green and pink paints identified on window sills in the main hallway leading to the Kindergarten Room. Appendix B Lead and Asbestos Sample Summaries contains a complete summary of swab and chip sampling data including Sample Number, Sample Location, Sample Description, Color of Outer and Inner Layers, Multiple Layers (Yes or No), Chip Collected (Yes or No), and Chip Sample Results in Percentage of Lead in Paint If the subject property is to be renovated or remodeled, there are procedures regarding the disturbance or removal of the lead-based paints that should be followed (i.e. initial air monitoring, clearance sampling, etc.). These procedures can be found in HUD -0006700 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Contra! of Lead -Based Paint Hazards in Housing. It is not required that these regulations/procedures be utilized on this project, however, because these are the only available guidelines for the removal of lead-based paints PRE feels it necessary to inform you of the existence of these guidelines. The only Washington State rules or regulations that currently apply to lead-based paints are WAC 296-155-17603 Scope* and WAC 296-155-17607 Permissible Exposure Limit'*. Initial air monitoring must be performed on employees doing renovation or remodeling work in areas found to have materials containing lead. Because the WAC codes do not specify an amount of lead that would establish a material as lead containing, it must be assumed that a material containing mu lead is regulated by these codes. Swab sampling of the paints in this building was intended to identify those paints that might contain lead. Those samples identified as positive by the swabs are chip sampled to establish the actual percentage of lead in the paint. Identifying paints with high lead contents aids in the separation of materials that may affect the TCLP results of the demolition/renovation waste stream. Low percentages of lead can still exist in those paints considered negative by swab sampling. These paints with such low levels of lead would not be considered lead-based paints by the HUD Guidelines, and it is highly unlikely that they could negatively affect the TCLP sample of the waste stream from the associated structure. However, as per the WAC codes, any presence of lead in paint would require initial air monitoring be performed. during renovation or demolition. Prior to disposal, the waste stream generated from the renovation or demolition of all structures must be analyzed using EPA Method 1311 - Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) - Lead by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Waste found to have a leachability greater than or equal to 5 ppm must be disposed of as hazardous waste, waste with a leachability of less than 5 ppm may be disposed of as solid waste. • WAC 296-156-17603 Scope. WAC 296-155476, Lead, applies to all bion work where an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead. All construction work excluded from coverage in the general industry standard for lead by WAC 29642-07521 (1)(b) is covered by this standard. Construction work Is defined as wary for construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating. It Includes but is not limited to the 1) Demolition or salvage of structures where lead or materials containing lead are present 2) Removal or encapsulation of materials containing lead; 3) New construction, alteration, repair, or renovation of stnrctures, substrates, or portions thereof, that contain lead, or materials containing lead; 4) Installation of products containing lead; 5) Lead cleanup; 06/02/97 PAGE 5 " WAC 296-15517607 Pemmtsstble exposure Ifmif. 1) The employer shall assure that no employee is a rposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air (50 l gkn) averaged over an 8 period. 2) If an employee is exposed to lead for more than 8 hours in any work day the employees' allowable exposure, as a time weighted average (TWA) for that day, shall be reduced according to the following formula: 3) Allowable employee exposure (µg/m3)=400 divided by hours worked in the day. When respirators are used to limit employee exposure as required by this section and all the requirements of WAC 296-155-17611(1) and 296-155-17613 have been met, employee exposure may be considered to be at the level provided by the protection factor of the respirator for those periods the respirator is wom. Those periods may be averaged with exposure levels during periods when respirators are not wom to determine the employee's daily TWA exposure. 06/02/97 PAGE 6 Appendix A Lead and Asbestos Samples Summaries Asbestos Sample Summary Project Name: City of Tukwila PRE Project ID: 11274 Sample # Sample Location 1 Kindergarten Room, above entry door 2 Corridor by Janitor's Closet 3 Kitchen 4 Kitchen 5 Kith= 6 Kitdian 7 8 Weight Room Saiior Service Center, northwest coma room 9 Corridor outside Room 7 10 Room 7 11 Boiler Room, cast wall 12 Boiler Room, east wall 13 Boiler Room, adjacait to hot water tank 14 Corridor outside g m nasium 15 Senior Service Canter, Mednanical Room AHERA Catcl'ory Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Miscellaneous TSI TSI TSI Miscellaneous Surfacing Sample Descrintion Acbcstos Tvpe/Percentaie Material Quantity Gray 3' x 7' ceiling panel Gray 2' x 4' ceiling panel White 12" x 12" ceiling tile Mastic forwhite 12" x 12" ceilingtilc Beige shed vinyl flooring Mastic for decorative cove baso Gypsum wall system (wallboard, tape, mud) Mastic for decorative cove base White 2' x 4' suspended ceiling tile Mastic for decorative cove base Layered papa insulation an 4" straight run piping Layered paper insulation with white magnesium -based insulation layer on pipe fitting Layered paper insulation on straight run piping Cove base and associated magic Mudded seam compound on gypsum wallboard None Detected None Detected None Detected Tremolite <1% None Detected Nonc Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected None Detected Chrysotile <1% Chrysotile 15-20%, Amosite 3-5% Chrysotile 40-45% Chrysotile 15-20% Chrysotile <1% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 60 Fittings 10 Linear Fed 250 Linear. Fed NA Monday, June 02, 1997 Page 1 of 1 Lead Swab Sample Summary Project Name: City of Tukwila PRE Project ID: 11274 $ample # Sample Location 1 Entry by Kindergarten, metal window frame 2 Entry by Kindergarten, east wall 3 Entry by Kindergarten, door frame 4 Kindergarten, door and window 5 6 7 frame Kindergarten, exterior door trim Kindergarten, men's restroom door Women's restroom, metal stall 8 Office space adjacent to Kindergarten, southwest window sill Storage wall adjacent to office nerd to Kindergarten Main hall entry way, door frame 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Main halhvay, panels Staff Room, window sill Staff Room, window frame Main hallway, window sill Room 4, west wall at wood trim Sample Description Layered Outer Color White paint on metal © White substrate White paint on cement ® White asbestos board (CAB) Light stain on wood ® Light Stain substrate Green paint on wood © Green substrate White paint on wood © White substrate Blue paint on wood substrate © Blue White paint on metal © White substrate White paint on cement © White substrate Yellow paint on sheet -rock ® Yellow White paint on wood substrate Pink paint on cement asbestos board (CAB) Dark pink on cement substrate Dark pink paint on cement substrate Greer paint on cement substrate Purple paint as wood substrate Inner Color White White Light Stain Light Stain White White White White Beige Swab Result Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive © White White Negative • Pink Pink • Dark pink Dark pink © Dark pink Dark pink ® Green © Purple Negative Negative Negative Pink Positive Turquoise Negative Chip Result (% by weight ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0.594 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 0.555 ❑ 0 Tuesday, June 03, 1997 Page 1 of 3 • Project Name: City of Tukwila PRE Project ID: 11274 Sample # Sample Location 16 Room 2, wood wall trim 17 Room 2, cabinet facing 18 Room 2, exit door 19 Crafts Room, wall panel 20 Crafts Room, cabinet facing 21 Senior Services Center, wall 22 Senior Service Carta, southwest office door 23 Senior Services Center 24 Senior Service Center, kitchen wall 25 Senior Service Center, exit door 26 Boiler room wall 27 Boiler Room, exit door 28 Kitchen adjacent to gymnasium, wall panel 29 Gymnasium, wood paneling 30 Entrance doors to Gym from main hallway 31 Hallway adjacent to Gym, wall panel 32 Gym, exterior wall Sample Description L;lyered Orange paint on wood substrate Red paint on wood substrate White paint on wood substrate 0 Outer Color Inner Color Swab Result Chip Result (% by weight) Burnt Orange Turquoise Negative Red • White Light pink on cement asbestos board (CAB) substrate Red stain on wood substrate ❑ White paint on sheetrodc 0 wall Stain on wood substrate ❑ Orange stain on wood substrate White paint on sheet -rock 0 substrate Blue paint on wood substrate 0 White paint on concrete substrate White paint on wood substrate Red Negative Grew Negative Light Pink Light Pink Negative Red Stain NA White White Clear varnish Orange NA Orange White White Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative Blue Orange Negative White White Negative O White Green Negative White paint on cattail 0 White White Positive asbestos board (CAB) substrate Stain on wood substrate ❑ Clear Varnish NA Negative Blue paint on wood substrate 0 Blue Blue Negative Pink paint on cement 0 Pink Pink Negative asbestos board (CAB) substrate White paint on concrete 0 White White Negative substrate ❑ 0 0.34 0.062 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 ❑ 0 O 0.26 0.275 O 0 O 0 O 0 ❑ 0 Tuesday, June 03, 1997 Page 2 of 3 Project Name: City of Tukwila PRE Project ID: 11274 Sample # Sample Location Sample Description Layered Outer Color Inner Color Swab Result Chip Result (% by weight) 33 Exterior door to hall from Gym Wood paint on wood © Blue Great Negative ❑ 0 subs rate 34 Exterior building window sill White paint on wood © White Green Negative ® 0.33 substrate 35 Exterior building window pane White paint on metal © Whitc Green Negative ❑ 0 substrate 36 Exterior door to Kindergarten White paint on wood © White Green Negative ❑ 0 substrate 37 Exterior concrete foundation White paint on concrete © White White Negative ® 0.047 Tuesday, June 03, 1997 Page 3 of 3 Appendix B Sample Location Drawings 11274-0J CUUNG 1111 112/4-04 415110 SOUTH FLOOR PLAN Scelt • NpK PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS DRAWN BY:JEFFDORN TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENT 4101 SOUTH 131ST STRE TUKWILA, WASHINGTI DATE:5/30/97 JOB x11274 DVG 111121 N NORTH FLOOR PLAN i Sale . NOME PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTE ASBESTOS SAMPLE LOCATIONS TUKV/ILA, OUTH WASHIT NGTDI DRAWN BY:JEFFDORNDATE:5/30/97IJOB I411274 DVG 111274- , SOUTH FLOOR PLAN Scale . NONt PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. LEAD SAMPLE LOCATIONS TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTEF 4101 SOUTH 131ST STREET TUKWILA, WASHINGTON DRAWN BY:JEFFDORN DATE:5/30/97 JOB x11274 DvG P 11271-: N N❑RTH FL❑❑R PLAN i Scale . NEM PACIFIC RIM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.TUKWILA COMMUNITY CENTER LEAD SAMPLE LOCATIONSTUKWIILAH WASHINGTON DRAWN BY:JEFFDORNDATE:5/30/97 JOB 411274 DWG P11274-4 Appendix C Laboratory Analysis Data Sheets PRECISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. • BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT CLIENT: Geo Engineers 8410 154th Avenue NE Redmond, WA 98052 Project: Tukwila Community Center P.O. #: None Given NVLAP Accredited LAB #101631 PAT #11567 PRE #: 11274 Report #: 597374 Report Date: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Page : Analyst: 05/27/97 05/16/97 05/23/97 1 of 3 Fred Golloway Attached are the results of analysis of 15 bulk samples submitted for asbestos identification, lab ID #597374 through #597388. Samples were analyzed in accordance with method EPA -600/M4-82-020: "Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Samples". Each sample was initially examined under a Nikon SMZ - 2T stereoscopic microscope at a magnification of 10X to 50X. Fibrous material was examined for morphology and content. Representative fibers from each sample were immersed in a fluid with a known refractive index. The specimens were examined under polarized light using a Nikon Labophot microscope with a McCrone Dispersion Staining objective under 100X magnification. Optical characteristics of the fibrous material were examined to determine the mineralogy of the fiber. The observed optical characteristics include angles of extinction, sign of elongation and refractive indices. Separate layers of inhomogeneous samples were analyzed, and reported separately. Unless otherwise stated, asbestos content was quantified by calibrated visual estimation (CVES). Samples in which asbestos was not observed were reported "none detected". The samples analyzed in this report were provided by third parties not subject to control by PRECISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PES). Consequently, the results presented represent microscopic examinations in PES laboratory facilities and PES makes no representation at to sample collection techniques or procedures. Test results pertain only to the samples submitted for analysis. This report can not be represented by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full without written permission of the laboratory. Samples submitted by: Third Party Reports reviewed by:_./� Approved Signatory / 14001 57th Ave. S., #110 Tukwila, WA 98168 (206) 244-4005 Fax: (206) 244-4047 • PRECISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT CLIENT: Geo Engineers Project: Tukwila Community Center P.O. #: None Given PRE#: Report #: Report Date: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Page : Analyst: 11274 597374 05/27/97 05/16/97 05/23/97 2 of 3 Fred Golloway Client/Lab Number Sample Location and Description Asbestos Type / % Other Material 516SgP001 597374 Brown, Shredded, fibrous ceiling tile material with white paint. None Detected Cellulose (90-95%), Binder, Paint 516SgP002 597375 Brown, Shredded, fibrous ceiling tile material with white paint. None Detected Cellulose (85-90%), Binder, Paint 516SgP003 597376 Brown, fibrous, white -painted ceiling tile. None Detected Cellulose (15-20%), Mineral wool (55- 60%), Binder, Paint 516SgP004 597377 Brown, brittle ceiling tile mastic. Tremolite <1% Cellulose (<1), Mineral wool (<1 %), Fibrous talc (<1 %), . Adhesive 516SgP005 597378 Beige, °masiac"-pattern sheet vinyl with light brown, fibrous backing with clear, brittle mastic. None Detected Cellulose (10-15%), Synthetics(1-3%), Fiberglass (1-3%), Vinyl, Binder, Adhesive 516SgP006 597379 Dark brown (black), pliable cove base mastic. None Detected Cellulose (<1 %), Mineral aggregate, Adhesive 516SgP007 597380 White, chalky sheetrock with brown paper and light brown glue. None Detected Cellulose (55-60%), Fiberglass (<1 %), Gypsum, Binder, Adhesive 516SgP008 597381 Brown, pliable, cove base mastic with blue and yellow paint. None Detected Cellulose (<1%), Adhesive, Paint 516SgP009 597382 Light brown, fibrous, white -painted ceiling tile. None Detected Cellulose (45-50%), Mineral wool (20- 25%), Perlite, Binder, Paint • • PRECISION ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS REPORT CLIENT: Geo Engineers Project: Tukwila Community Center P.O. #: None Given PRE #: Report #: Report Date: Date Received: Date Analyzed: Page : Analyst: 11274 597374 05/27/97 05/16/97 05/23/97 3 of 3 Fred Golloway 516SgP010 597383 Light brown, pliable, cove base mastic with yellow paint layers, with white, fibrous bundles adhering to paint. -like pipe insulation with white paint. Chrysotile 1-3% (paint layer on surface) None Detected (mastic) Cellulose (1-3%), Paint, Adhesive 516SgP011 597384 Brown and black, layered, paper -like, insulation with white paint. Chrysotile <1% Cellulose (75-80%), Animal hair (5- pipe 10%), Tar, Binder, Paint 516SgP012. 597385 Light brown, layered, paper -like, pipe insulation with Tight brown, chalky, powdery, insulation -like material and gray or soot -darkened paint and cloth wrap. Chrysotile 15-20% Amosite 3-5% (chalky, fibrous, insulation -like material) Chrysotile <1% Cellulose (50-55%), Binder, Soot, Paint •' (paper layers) 516SgP013 597386 Brown, layered, paper -like, pipe insulation with silver -painted cloth wrap. Chrysotile 40-45% (layer under wrap) 1-3% (other paper layers) Cellulose (<1 %), Mineral aggregate, Adhesive None Detected (paint or wrap) 10-15% Total Asbestos 516SgP014 597387 Light brown, pliable, cove base mastic with adhering Tight brown mud and fibrous, black, cove base -like material. Chrysotile 15-20% (black cove base -like material) <1 % (adhering to mastic and mud) Cellulose (<1%), Mineral aggregate, 'Adhesive 516SgP015 597388 White, chalky wallboard with brown paper and beige -painted, light brown, brittle mud. Chrysotile <1% ' Cellulose (35-40%), Gypsum, Binder, Paint 06i02/1937 11:38 12062339011 EMSL alALYTICAL • • ELECTRON -MICROSCOPY SERVICES LABORATORIES, INC. 1001 SW Klickitat Way, Suite 107, Seattle, WA 98134 - Tel (206) 233-9007 - Fax 233-9011 June 2, 1997 Pacific Rim Environmental, Inc. 6510 Soutlacenter Blvd. Tukwila, WA 98188 Billing Number: SE971514 ATOMJC ABSORPTION SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC ANALYSIS LEAD IN BULK PAINT SAMPLES METHOD, SW 846-7420 PROJECT: PRE No: 11274 EMSL # SAMPLE # LOCATION RESULTS (%wt ) 40371 11274-01 40372 11274-02 40373 11274-03 40374 11274-04 40375 11274-05 40376 11274-06 40377 11274-07 40378 11274-08 40379 11274-09 0.594 0.555 0.340 0.062 Insufficient sample weight for analysis 0.260 0.275 0.330 0.047 Laboratory Manager Page 1 of 1 • !r • Appendix D Inspector Cetifications Prezant Associates, Inc. Environmental Health Sciences and Engineering CERTIFICATE This is to certify that David Abrass has satisfactorily completed 2 clays of training in Lead Inspection P-2-6-91 Date Certificate It 13-0100 Director has satisfactorily completed One half-day refresher training as a in compliance with TSCA Title II AHERA Accredited Prezant Asseciales. Inc. • 330 Sixth Avenuo Not111. Suite 200 • Seanlo, Washington 90109 • (206) zel•aose .; v;a7CAWFWV.VAIVAINi.V.V.5.41717Y.V.3.6,04 41.1eikiTg.FT71--IFF t.7.7 A 1,..., : ..,,, ...s ....:..; ,:..s........ ..s. ...... ,:rini "' . 'fi • " 1..11:. Prczant Associatcs Scattic WA _ . 41kgAiVi2=57727VMPliVIMFMEggirUMPRIMVIVP/A NGIGl2Gl29 J&J Associates is pleased to certify that Shiela G. Phillips has attended and successfully completed the AHERA BUILDING INSPECTOR REFRESHER in accordance with 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C on this 5th day of October, 1996 at Tukwila, Washington -Valid through October 5, 1997 J&J961005-BIR 03 INSTRUCTOR ACCREDITATION NO. J&J ASSOCIATES 550 NW Fairwood Way Bremerton, Washington 98311 (360) 731-6015 RECTOR Certificate of Completion 5/eita Phillips has successfully completed a tutorial on Removing Lead Paint From Industrial Structures and is awarded 1.0 CEU Steel Structures Painting Council 4400 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Bernard R; .4pp(eman Executive Director john C. HCauck, President January 15-16, 1992 Tacoma, WA SSPC is a CEU User Member of the International Association for Continuing Education and Training.