Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Permit D08-389 - SEGMENT 2 - KING COUNTY - BOW LAKE RETAINING WALLS
D08-389 Bow Lake Retaining Walls 18800 Orillia Road South Due to the file size, this record has been broken down into 4 segments for easier download. Click on the following links to review the permit segments: Segment 1 - King County — Bow Lake Retaining Walls D08-389 Segment 2 - King County — Bow Lake Retaining Walls D08-389 Segment 3 - King County — Bow Lake Retaining Walls D08-389 Segment 4 - Plans - King County — Bow Lake Retaining Walls D08-389 Y (A0'6) . . . . .01 ooe. . . . -Benzene (8,034) TFT(Surr) (8,883) HTBE (8,338) -Ethulbenzene (14.035) 4 Xylene (15,046) F C g- 3 (.4 Toluene (11.026) H. r-• 8 a 11/1) --Xylene (14.212) N. A A ". (16.233) -1) T•TpTal zluawn.4sui 3 45 Analytical Resources Inc. BETX/Gas Quantitation Report Data file 1: /chem3/pidl.i/1008.b/1008.0010.d Data file 2:/chem3/pidl.i/1008.b/1008b.0010.d Method: /chem3/pidl.i/100B.b/PIDB.m Instrument: pidi.i Gas Ical Date: 28 -SEP -07 BETX Ical Date: 30 -AUG -2007 FID Surrogates ARI ID: LR46A Client ID: B-238 Injection Date: 08 -OCT -2007 16:08 Matrix: SOIL Dilution Factor: 1.000 RT Shift Height Area %Rec Compound 8.8- 87 0.005 16834 111565 108.0 TFT(Surr) 16.233 0.002 12922 52685 111.1 BB(Surr) PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (FID) Range Total Area* Amount" WAGas (Tol-C12) 261886 0.216 (11.025-18.402) 8015B (2MP-TMB) 149695 0.061 (5,023-16.838) AKGas (nC6-nC10) 88736 0.050 (5.576-15.999) NWGas (Tol-Nap) 337454 0,267 (11.025-19.552)412W 4 * Surrogate areas are subtracted from Total Area PID Surrogates RT Shift Response %Rec Compound 8.- 885 0.010 36492 100.5 TFT(Surr) 16.235 0.005 90059 101.6 BB(Surr) AROMATICS (PID) RT Shift Response Amount Compound N- D Benzene ND - Toluene ND Ethylbenzene ND M/P-Xylene ND O -Xylene ND MTBE A Indicates Peak Area was used for quantitation instead of Height N Indicates peak peak was manually integrated Y (x10^4) -2 -Nethylpentane (5.014) -nC6 (5.571) -nC7 (7.779) -Toluene (1.2.034) : •• -nCiO-Decane (16.002) -1,2,4-Trimeth9lbenzene (16.858) .398) -nC12-Dodeoane (16.402) 13 (19.263) -Naphthalene (19.337) TFT(Surr) (8.887) -BBCSurr) (16.233) 4P0'0TOWSOOT/WOT00.800T/WBOOTIT'TPTollEwaq0/ cp 3 0 v. ft • L. 3 Y (x14'4) <a <> r 1.7 Pa PJ JO ra 04 OJ 64 C44 0.1 4, 4, 4, 4• tn cn CR cri en CP CP 01 01 -.4 sl NJ NI CO CO CO CO CO 04 10 • *C0 47 6) 444. 17 6) *4, ON oa 64 4, to 4> 4> IN to 4> 4o> 44 It, to I> 67 6, *0, tO *CP 6J IA *CO t) 4 1) *4) *CA tO I) I1) —TFT(Surr) (SASS) 7 3 A BB(Surr) (16.235) 8 ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET NWTPH-HCID Method by GC/FID Page 1 of 1 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized Reported: 10/02/07 ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED QC Report No: LR46-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Extraction Analysis ARI ID Sample ID Date Date DL Range Result MB -100107 Method Blank 10/01/07 10/01/07 1.0 Gas < 20 U 07-20589 Diesel < 50 U Oil < 100 U o-Terphenyl 81.9% LR46A 8-238 10/01/07 10/01/07 1.0 Gas > 20 07-20589 HC ID: GRO Diesel < 50 U Oil < 100 U o-Terphenyl 88.2% LR46B B-239 10/01/07 10/01/07 1.0 Gas < 32 U 07-20590 HC ID: --- Diesel < 81 U Oil < 160 U o-Terphenyl 82.7% Reported in mg/kg (ppm) Gas value based on total peaks in the range from Toluene to C12. Diesel value based on the total peaks in the range from C12 to C24. Oil value based on the total peaks in the range from C24 to C38. FORM I INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL METALS Page z of z Lab Sample ID: LR46ma LIMS ID: 07-30589 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized Reported: I0/05/07 Percent Total Solids: NA Prep Meth ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Sample ID: METHOD BLANK QC Report No: LR46-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: mu Date Received: NA Prep Analysis Analysis Date Method Date CAS Number Analyte RL mg/kg -dry Q 3050o 10/01/07 6010a 10/83/07 7440-88-2 Arsenic 3050a 10/01/07 6010a 10/03/07 7440-39-3 Barium 3050a 10/01/07 6010a 10/03/07 7440-43-9 cadmium 3050o 10/0I/07 6010a 10/03/07 7440-47-3 Chromium snuua 10/01/07 6010o I0/03/07 7439-92-1 Lead CLP 10/01/07 7471A 10/04/07 7439-97-6 Mercury 3050a 10/01/07 00108 10/03/07 7782-49-2 Selenium 3050a 10/01/07 6010B 10/03/07 7440-22-4 .Silver 5 0.3 0.2 0.5 2 0.05 5 0.3 5 o 0.3 n 0.2 o 0.5 o 2 O 0.05 o 5 o 0.3 O • . ,! • ••. U -Analyte undetected at given RL RL -Reporting Limit ' INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL METALS Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample ID: LR46A LIMS ID: 07-20589 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorize Reported: 10/05/07 Percent Total Solids: 92.1% Prep Meth ANALYTICAL RESOURCES V INCORPORATED Sample ID: B-238 SAMPLE QC Report No: LR46-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: 09/27/07 Date Received: 09/28/07 Prep Analysis Analysis Date Method Date CAS Number Analyte RL mg/kg -dry Q 3050B 10/01/07 60108 30508 10/01/07 60108 3050B 10/01/07 60108 3050E 10/01/07 6010B 3050B 10/01/07 6010B CLP 10/01/07 7471A 3050B 10/01/07 60108 30508 10/01/07 60108 U -Analyte undetected at RL -Reporting Limit 10/03/07 10/03/07 10/03/07 10/03/07 10/03/07 10/04/07 10/03/07 10/03/07 given RL 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7439-92-1 7439-97-6 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 FORM -I Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 10 0.8 0.5 1 5 0.05 10 0.8 10 U 136 1.4 49 345 0.13 10 U 2.4 INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL METALS Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample ID: LR46B LIMS ID: 07-20590 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized: Reported: 10/05/07 Percent Total Solids: 91.8% Prep Meth ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Sample ID: B-239 SAMPLE QC Report No: LR46-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: 09/27/07 Date Received: 09/28/07 Prep Analysis Analysis Date Method Date CAS Number Analyte RL mg/kg -dry Q 30509 10/01/07 6010B 3050B 10/01/07 6010B 3050E 10/01/07 6010B 3050E 10/01/07 6010B 3050B 10/01/07 6010B CLP 10/01/07 7471A 3050B 10/01/07 6010B 3050B 10/01/07 6010B U -Analyte undetected at RL -Reporting Limit 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 10/04/07 given RL 7440-38-2 7440-39-3 7440-43-9 7440-47-3 7439-92-1 7439-97-6 7782-49-2 7440-22-4 FORM -I Arsenio Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 30 30 245 5 75 1,270 0.10 30 U 2 U 2 1 3 10 0.04 30 2 INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TOTAL METALS Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample ID: LR46LCS LIMS ID: 07-20589 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized Reported: 10/05/07 Analyte ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Sample ID: LAB CONTROL QC Report No: LR46-BWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: NA Date Received: NA BLANK SPIKE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT Analysis Method Spike Found Spike Added Recovery Q Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver Reported in mg/kg -dry 6010B 6010E 6010B 6010B 6010B 7471A 6010E 6010B N -Control limit not met Control Limits: 80-120% 201 185 49.1 47.7 196 1.04 205 50.0 FORM -VII 200 200 50.0 50.0 200 1.00 200 50.0 100% 92.5% 98.2% 95.4% 98.0% 104% 102% 100% fp, Analytical Resources, Incorporated 40 Analytical Chemists and Consultants 18 October 2007 Vance Atkins HWA Geosciences 19730 64th Ave. W Suite 200 Lynnwood, WA 98036 RE: Client Project: 2003-008, Bow Lake Transfer Station ARI Job No: LT74 Dear Vance: Please find enclosed the final results for the sample from the project referenced above. Sample B-239 was analyzed -for TCLP lead as requested on 10/15/07. This analysis proceeded without incident of note. A copy of these reports and all raw .data will be kept of file at ARI. If you have any questions or require additional information; please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ANALYTICAL RESOURCES, INC. Mark D. Harris Project Manager 206/695-6210 <markh@arilabs.com> Enclosures cc: file LT74 MDH/mdh 4611 South 134th Place, Suite 100 • Tukwila WA 98168 • 206-695-6200 • 206-695-6201 fax INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TCLP METALS Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample ID: LT74MB LIMS ID: 07-21859 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized Reported: 10/18/07 Prep Meth Sample ID: METHOD BLANK ANALYTICAL. 0 RESOURCES INCORPORATED QC Report No: LT74-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: NA Date Received: NA Prep Analysis Analysis Date Method Date CAS Number Analyte RL mg/L Q 1311 10/16/07 6010B 10/17/07 7439-92-1 U -Analyte undetected at given RL RL -Reporting Limit Lead 0.1 0.1 U INORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET TCLP METALS Page 1 of 1 Lab Sample ID: LT74A LIMS ID: 07-21859 Matrix: Soil Data Release Authorized: Reported: 10/18/07 Prep Meth ANALYTICAL RESOURCES INCORPORATED Sample ID: B-239 SAMPLE QC Report No: LT74-HWA GeoSciences, Inc. Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station 2003-008 Date Sampled: 09/27/07 Date Received: 09/28/07 Prep Analysis Analysis Date Method Date CAS Number Analyte RL mg/L Q 1311 10/16/07 6010B 10/17/07 7439-92-1 U -Analyte undetected at given RL RL -Reporting Limit FORM -I Lead 0.1 0.9 J KING COUNTY DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PARKS SOLID WASTE DIVISION BOW LAKE RECYCLING AND TRANSFER STATION SITE PREPARATION CONTRACT • Site Retaining Walls Prepared by: Rick Lippold, PE, R.W. Beck Inc. Lisa Gocry, PE, R.W. Beck Inc. David Maloney, PE, HWA GeoSciences Inc. July 2008 r. PcRcQ 'g7.7. r. I No. REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE APPROVED OCT 0 2l 18 1 MAE& A -2, 41 o Of Tukwila ILDIN DM ION RECEIVED CIN OF TUKWILA AUG - 4 ZUU8 PERMIT CENTER ¶705 -3e41 i" RW8 SO 31 [t�I�IiE[l( .ETINu%KK wA I -t -s (,OAP Pale orri 6 t,37 - COMP. JT COMP. 1.a1 U CHK. R ^^ REV. DATE S.-7-13.08 DATE 7--tit-ot9 DATE PROJECT DOL-) LA -kc FILE NO PAGE 1 OF PAGES S E 1 S M t c, DES t G N C R-1 TE RA A AS -0C 1- O S u. IS - Nd N- By l Lot aG SritAkVg v " 0,30 Sys W L v rtlid ron IDIA3 CASA 7 -OS IS.`I-S ] C -Fr cAvrc S. Ssz-- 1,1B FA= 1.0 .i= IS Stn:: 2 $MS 3 CFi.OM 6EOTEtI1 CTABLG 11.4— I ] CTABLE t1.s�I St -is = Fo..Ss - I.0 (l.3$) = /.38 [Il.y-1 1 SDS - ? (1.3 8) = 0.92 3 V= O.3(4.9z)(1.s-)w/ 0=tfI W. awe SO 31 COMP. /2 -WC CHK. REV. DATE 5-2 9 DATE DATE PROJECT FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES tAA,....pa. of toap� 6v0,..tv0`aii. IAJ _ 1 0' a1 a�.G�ti too„ "1 �r W w/ p"__ 1 ew+(MjC, Ni vjm 4 pvo4C /, ZSR(/' lirti 60/8 -s } / /fR .G.t f9 slL., sar aiJa.(a Wall A — Soldier Pile Wall Load Diagram SURCHARGE SOIL SEISMIC CONCRETE FACING SEISMIC 0.4I g 6.5H PSF SOIL ACTIVE 70 PSF VEHICLE IMPACT 1000 LB/FT OVER PILE SPACING 35 PCF (WALL_A) 43 PCF (WALL D) A CONCRETE MASS x SEISMIC 0.41 G 70 PSF OVER 1xDIA 35H PSF (WALL A) 43H PSF (WALL 0) OVER IxDTA 35 PCF (WALLA) 43 PCF (WALL 0) OVER 1x 01A t � 1 SOU. ACTIVE 230 PCF OVER 3xDIA SOIL, PASSIVE Design Requirements and Assumptions • Apply surcharge load to 13' depth maximum. • Round H up to nearest even integer for pile design (H=2 ft, 4ft...14 ft) • Pile spacing = 8'-0" • Pile diameter = 30" • Provide pile sections with 10" flange for lagging installation. • Minimum pile embedment shall be greater of 1.5H (per geotech recommendations) or 1.2 times the calculated depth where moment in pile is zero. • Assume 50 ksi steel • Limit deflection to 2 inches for the construction load case. Design Load Cases • LC1 — Construction Load Case (ASCE 2.4.1-3). Note: This load case assumes H'=H+2 to account for temporary excavation at the base of the wall and includes surcharge loading. • LC2 —Seismic Load Case (ASCE 2.4.1-5) • LC3 — Normal Load Case (ASCE 2.4.1-3) • LC4 — Vehicle Impact Case Wall A.doc WALL ,; Souvlcr Pica SELEc-Tlnt.4 (i) SvMM4+e-1( (Z) p u- T (3) OLS16-14- GALCS (q) SP LEA Rs rt€Ef p c ut6 4K Eo R. (0' N 0 G tri (2.t M. 7-74 -0$ Wall A Soldier Pile - Summary Table Piles 1-18 H dmin (1.5H) (ft) dcalc3 (ft) Mmax (ft -Ib) d' (ft) Sreq (50 ksi) Section2 (50 ksi) 1(in4) S (in3) AVV 2t� a S 4 83:, 8 '`r :�y 12 y' ,�3, `T "`a c+a •+-: 6 X,.•�_�9 '., LR 12 Fvm+i 18 qi p022.7&;:,1 V� Z,: ?9 1 �(1„*_ _Y::ii: 10.9 4 , (, 3 �""r �1Y:_ ti.�� 15.2 1 ti :' a •;.C4, 4. 19.7 '?�A.yg7+' r =:.21:'9 '' i r;. < 5 7t r..,. ,�X:i 94120 n.. 112795 M :400,ia: �<.f �..�n;. 11 - t V144 ':: �• rf�'+��C"5��.f:.f n 2 .��y i :�::�,dS`. .o 34 e. •.-....2 i `� i���✓ � -5 76 ,�;0.k� s=W 2558 i.4•.:.-..� W12x58 2x58 ' ��.......rs✓1f W12x58 113. 18� W18x86 ' 7.5. ...\;-' 475 H. 475 Bks : �• , S�..w.6..vx.._i✓'�L' 475 �'���; 7.gw € F. :..•...a ws....:'.:v'�.�&. 78 '�: rti =': a �.{T�+ 78 Ervintem 166 0:...17.7511741 207836 "- IT4ri .,_ L: 411235 ^' � 't,6 rr *55 640 - �. 16 i�" ,. t a 1530 iF1 4 . 2190. 20 ..L �. ',....... y t r 4 22 �� _ .�.:.�� 150 •t -0.51n1. 3 ,2 x._ t Fi7' Dr az_ ,i} 44 ?n 8 '4.Q^'f'^^A ..X1;19, Piles 19-109 H dmin (1.511) (ft) dcalc3 (ft) Mmax (ftIb) di (ft) W12x72 597 Sreq (50 ksi) Section2 (50 ksi) 1 (in') S (in3) 4 8 6 12 166 166 11 W18x175 3450 344 15 W12x58 10.9 41893 475 78 15.2 151677 16 55 W12x58 475 78 12 4_ .. 18 '_ . x q 19.7 366295 20 133 W18x76 1330 146 2 .9; ,, 9,3smOm r srv-t fi-1, .: ; ; A r= - N:1009.11 .,_ 190. i'-' Calculate Deflection for Construction Load Case H W (Pa) (k) w (Psurch) (k/in) 0.01 A Total (in) 0.02 0.043 0.061 0.08 0.16 1. d is the greater of dcalc and dmin, rounded up to nearest whole foot. 2. Section req'd for 10" flange, req'd S, total deflection of 2" max. 3. dcalc is the maximum calculated depth below H for LC 1 and LC2 Pile Options Sec�y!tio�nx W12x65 1(in4 in3 533 q�S ,�a'*aR'Y..:,yA 88 W12x72 597 97 h .2 ••• a ,_4`.x;4+ , k`'.d.''e W18x86 1530 166 166 �M1 W18x175 3450 344 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Tab:Summary Table Wall A Soldier Pile without Vehicle Barrier Wall Wall Height Embed Pile ID Height for Analysis Depth L_'`I °�t:S1�3�'-` V t'"''•s• 4 F '� �*:sf,f�4 22:4''' kcrt_.�fr�T�E�'c>z-2,>5..,..r'.��_i:':cL.::a.i:�t�:T�?f�t-:.�.i�.i:::._ A20 13 14 22 A22 A24 Ygirts 14 1 14 22 4 14 22 Pile Length Section 35 W18x119 36 36 W18x119 W18x119 "1 X7' 9i A26 14 14 22 36 W18x119 44 A28 13 14 22 35 W18x119 ?F A30 13 14 22 35 W18x119 A32 13 14 22 35 W18x119 -:t A34 12 12 20 32 W18x76 404 A36 12 12 20 32 W18x76 4 A38 11 12 20 31 W18x76 Rz A40 11 12 20 31 W18x76 A42 11 12 20 31 W 18x76 A44 10 10 18 28 W12x72 RT<r's• A46 9 10 18 27 W12x72 .r/ A48 9 10 18 27 W 12x72 aV. 104 'x: 2.4 il A50 8 8 16 24 W 12x58 tt` � $S. 7 %'r• �'S J i• i�A4 l%7"wX�iz•� '§`'::.r �,,,K.nf .2-. ��°-F . t+a�'�" �;.,+✓la'�n.._4, oYY�i��6'<'. A52 8 8 16 24 W 12x58 A54 7 8 16 23 W 12x58 ° A56 7 8 16 23 W 12x58 A58 6 6 13 19 W 12x58 k is rt A60 6 6 13 19 W12x58 A62 6 6 13 19 W12x58 .4 d 34 A64 A66 5 6 5 6 13 13 18 18 W 12x58 OWN W12x58 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\CalculationslRetaining WallslAddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Wall A Soldier Pile without Vehicle Barrier Wall Wall Height Pile ID Height for Analysis A68 4 4 ,f9 Jaz A70 4 4 Embed Pile Depth Length Section Yya , ..�.' axe �•�:�' 15 W12x58 45 15 11 hlyj 11 W 12x58 t A72 3 Std"", A74 3 411 _ 4 11 14 14 W12x58 W12x58 }Sir�7 A76 3 4 11 14 W12x58 A78 3 4 11 14 W12x58 latr A80 3 4 11 14 W12x58 A82 3 4 11 14 W12x58 A84 3 4 11 14 W12x58 A86 4 4 11 15 W12x58 (r A88 4 4 11 15 W 12x58 3 ;rt ry i �ti' 'may' ' ary A90 4 4 11 15 W 12x58 C,¢„a yea u Rte°: A92 5 6 13 18 W12x58 A94 5 6 13 18 W12x58 3. S�Yt `i� r A96 5 6 13 18 W 12x58 .S ,ASF , F 'k •P_Y IC A98 5 6 13 18 W12x58 . x r: �F � a r r . 7 < � F SS'i K"� e ♦3•.c4k�.� -��$'� r' A100 5 6 13 18 W 12x58 A102 5 6 13 18 W12x58 CK 14,4 �n. i4 A104 4 4 11 15 W 12x58 A106 3 4 11 14 W12x58 is A108 3 4 11 14 W12x58 f.. R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Wall A Soldier Pile without Vehicle Barrier Wall Wall Height Embed Pile ID Height for Analysis Depth A2 4 4 A4 11 13 Pile Length Section ValarP ""i:�4:�.�M-4 15 W12x58 19 W12x58 A6 16 23 W 12x58 A8 9 10 18 18 Al 0 10 10 -41 27 W18x76 28 "rte W 18x76 Al 2 10 10 18 28 W 18x76 ti• A14 Al 6 11 12 12 r 12 20 20 a;N 31 32 W18x86 s9.!o W 18x86 Alb 12 12 20 32 i o W 18x86 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations1Retaining WallslAddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: E S T Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA fy fb Wall A (1-5 Wall, Perimeter Road) Load Factor Matrix 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.75 ft Concrete facing thickness 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 50 30 (0.6*fy) Construction Seismic Check Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 3 1 1 1 1 rwu P Ex—conc A Pal Psurch Ea DIA Pat Psurch2 Pa3 Pa — KayH2 EFWAx H2 `— 2 2 Pae=KayHxd xDia=EFWAxHxdxDia z z Pa3 = K2 x Dia = EFWAx d x Dia 2 Pas,,,,,,, = 70H x L Pas,„rhz =70H x Dia Ea=6.5HxHxL Efacing = Sx x W.c fQc; g = 0.41x W a,c facing z z Pp = Kp x 3Dia = EFW2 x d x 3Dia R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 1 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fY fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) 2 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 275 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 3 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 Ib/ft 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 8.6 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 15900 Req'd Sec Mod= LC2 3.25 2302 6 -1 LC3 9.10 59547 22 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIlA-SoldierPiie.xls Page 1 of 4 "ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS" Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 2 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 2240 1.33 2987 Psurch Surch 1 2240 2.00 4480 TOTAL 4480 7467 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 4480 Ib 7467 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V"d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((yor3"d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 7467 0 0 0 0 7467 1 11947 175 15 88 -288 11936 2 16427 700 117 350 -2300 15293 3 20907 1575 394 788 -7763 15900 4 25387 2800 933 1400 -18400 12120 5 29867 4375 1823 2188 -35938 2315 6 34347 6300 3150 3150 -62100 -15153 7 38827 8575 5002 4288 -98613 -41921 8 43307 11200 7467 5600 -147200 -79627 9 47787 14175 10631 7088 -209588 -129907 10 52267 17500 14583 8750 -287500 -194400 11 56747 21175 19410 10588 -382663 -274743 12 61227 25200 25200 0 -496800 -385173 13 65707 29575 32040 0 -631638 -504316 14 70187 34300 40017 0 -788900 -644397 15 74667 39375 49219 0 -970313 -807052 16 79147 44800 59733 0 -1177600 -993920 17.75 86987 55136 81555 0 -1607803 -1384125 18.5 90347 59894 92336 0 -1820342 -1577766 19.5 94827 66544 108134 0 -2131777 -1862273 5.165275251 30607 4669 2010 2335 -39620 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 5.17 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 7:17 Embeded Length (ft)= 8.60 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 15900 x the wall height= 4.30 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 3 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 4480 0 0 0 0 4480 1 4480 350 44 175 -863 4186 2 4480 700 175 350 -3450 2255 3 4480 1050 394 525 -7763 -1314 4 4480 1400 700 700 -13800 -6520 5 4480 1750 1094 875 -21563 -13364 6 4480 2100 1575 1050 -31050 -21845 12.5 4480 4375 6836 0 -134766 -119075 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls1AddressReviewComments\Wall A\Wa11A-SoldierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 2 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A] Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 560 0.67 373 Psurch Surch 0 0 1.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 631 1.00 631 Ea E 0.7 146 1.00 146 TOTAL 1337 1150 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M) Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 1337 Ib 1150 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M*) MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((rj*3*d^3)16) Mtotal 0 1150 0 0 0 0 1150 1 2487 88 15 0 -288 2302 2 3824 350 117 0 -2300 1991 3 5161 788 394 0 -7763 -1420 4 6498 1400 933 0 -18400 -9568 5 7835 2188 1823 0 -35938 -24092 6 9172 3150 3150 0 -62100 -46628 7 10509 4288 5002 0 -98613 -78814 8 11846 5600 7467 0 -147200 -122287 9 13183 7088 10631 0 -209588 -178685 10 14520 8750 14583 0 -287500 -249646 11 15857 10588 19410 0 -382663 -336807 12 17194 12600 25200 0 -496800 -441806 13 18531 14788 32040 0 -631638 -566279 14 19868 17150 40017 0 -788900 -711865 15 21205 19688 49219 0 -970313 -880201 16 22542 22400 59733 0 -1177600 -1072924 17 23879 25288 71648 0 -1412488 -1291673 18 25216 28350 85050 0 -1676700 -1538084 2.71 4769 641 289 0 -5699 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 2.71 Embeded Length (ft)= 3.25 x the wall height= 1.62 Mmax (ft -lb)= 2302 Depth (ft)= 1.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\CalculationslRetaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Wail A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 2 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point AI Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 560 0.67 373 Psurch Surch 1 1120 1.00 1120 Vimpact D 1 8000 4.25 34000 TOTAL 9680 35493 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 9680 Ib 35493 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V'd)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 (( '3•d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 35493 0 0 0 0 35493 1 45173 88 15 88 -288 45075 2 54853 350 117 350 -2300 53370 3 64533 788 394 788 -7763 58740 4 74213 1400 933 1400 -18400 59547 5 83893 2188 1823 2188 -35938 54154 6 93573 3150 3150 3150 -62100 40923 7 103253 4288 5002 4288 -98613 18218 8 112933 5600 7467 5600 -147200 -15600 9 122613 7088 10631 7088 -209588 -62168 10 132293 8750 14583 8750 -287500 -123123 11 141973 10588 19410 10588 -382663 -200104 12 151653 12600 25200 0 -496800 -307347 13 161333 14788 32040 0 -631638 -423477 14 171013 17150 40017 0 -788900 -560720 15 180693 19688 49219 0 -970313 -720713 16 190373 22400 59733 0 -1177600 -905093 17 200053 25288 71648 0 -1412488 -1115499 18 209733 28350 85050 0 -1676700 -1353567 7.58 108885 5030 6356 5030 -125300 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 7.58 Embeded Length (ft)= 9.10 x the wall height= 4.55 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 59547 Depth (ft)= 4.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xis Page 4 of 4 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fY fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) 4 ft Wail height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 550 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles, 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 6 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 Ib/ft 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 - 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 10.9 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 41893 Req'd Sec Mod= 15 LC2 LC3 5.77 10.60 13364 94120 5 34 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WalIA-SoldierPile.xis Page 1 of 4 **ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS" Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 4 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 5040 2.00 10080 Psurch Surch 1 3360 3.00 10080 TOTAL 8400 20160 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 8400 Ib 20160 ft -lb H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$'3•d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 20160 0 0 0 0 20160 1 28560 263 15 88 -288 28637 2 36960 1050 117 350 -2300 36177 3 45360 2363 394 788 -7763 41141 4 53760 4200 933 1400 -18400 41893 5 62160 6563 1823 2188 -35938 36795 6 70560 9450 3150 3150 -62100 24210 7 78960 12863 5002 4288 -98613 2500 8 87360 16800 7467 5600 -147200 -29973 9 95760 21263 10631 7088 -209588 -74846 10 104160 26250 14583 8750 -287500 -133757 11 112560 31763 19410 10588 -382663 -208342 12 120960 37800 25200 12600 -496800 -300240 13 129360 44363 32040 14788 -631638 -411088 14 137760 51450 40017 17150 -788900 -542523 15 146160 59063 49219 19688 -970313 -696184 16 154560 67200 59733 22400 -1177600 -873707 17.75 169260 82704 81555 27568 -1607803 -1246716 18.5 175560 89841 92336 29947 -1820342 -1432658 19.5 183960 99816 108134 33272 -2131777 -1706595 7.09151458 79729 13201 5201 4400 -102531 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 7.09 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 9:09 Embeded Length (ft)= 10.91 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 41893 x the wall height= 2.73 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 4 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Find Vmax V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 8400 0 0 0 0 8400 1 8400 525 44 175 -863 8281 2 8400 1050 175 350 -3450 6525 3 8400 1575 394 525 -7763 3131 4 8400 2100 700 700 -13800 -1900 5 8400 2625 1094 875 -21563 -8569 6 8400 3150 1575 1050 -31050 -16875 7 8400 3675 2144 1225 -42263 -26819 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calcutations\Retaining Watls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\Wa1IA-SotdierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 4 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 2240 1.33 2987 Psurch Surch 0 0 2.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 1263 2.00 2526 Ea E 0.7 582 2.00 1165 TOTAL 4085 6677 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 4085 Ib 6677 ft -Ib H Surch H 1 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((y**"3'd^3)/6) Mtotal 0 6677 0 0 0 0 6677 1 10762 175 15 0 -288 10664 2 14847 700 117 0 -2300 13364 3 18933 1575 394 0 -7763 13139 4 23018 2800 933 0 -18400 8351 5 27103 4375 1823 0 -35938 -2637 6 31188 6300 3150 0 -62100 -21462 7 35273 8575 5002 0 -98613 -49762 8 39359 11200 7467 0 -147200 -89175 9 43444 14175 10631 0 -209588 -141337 10 47529 17500 14583 0 -287500 -207888 11 51614 21175 19410 0 -382663 -290463 12 55699 25200 25200 0 -496800 -390701 13 59785 29575 32040 0 -631638 -510238 14 63870 34300 40017 0 -788900 -650713 15 67955 39375 49219 0 -970313 -813764 16 72040 44800 59733 0 -1177600 -1001026 17 76125 50575 71648 0 -1412488 -1214139 18 80211 56700 85050 0 -1676700 -1454739 4.81 26328 4049 1623 0 -32001 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 4:81_ Embeded Length (ft)= 5.77 x the wall height= 1.44 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 13364 Depth (ft)= 2.0 (d Q M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SotdierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 4 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 2240 1.33 2987 Psurch Surch 1 2240 2.00 4480 Vimpact D 1 8000 6.25 50000 TOTAL 12480 57467 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 12480 Ib 57467 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V'd)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 (('3'd^3)/6) Mtotal 0 57467 0 0 0 0 57467 1 69947 175 15 88 -288 69936 2 82427 700 117 350 -2300 81293 3 94907 1575 394 788 -7763 89900 4 107387 2800 933 1400 -18400 94120 5 119867 4375 1823 2188 -35938 92315 6 132347 6300 3150 3150 -62100 82847 7 144827 8575 5002 4288 -98613 64079 8 157307 11200 7467 5600 -147200 34373 9 169787 14175 10631 7088 -209588 -7907 10 182267 17500 14583 0 -287500 -73150 11 194747 21175 19410 0 -382663 -147330 12 207227 25200 25200 0 -496800 -239173 13 219707 29575 32040 0 -631638 -350316 14 232187 34300 40017 0 -788900 -482397 15 244667 39375 49219 0 -970313 -637052 16 257147 44800 59733 0 -1177600 -815920 17 269627 50575 71648 0 -1412488 -1020638 18 282107 56700 85050 0 -1676700 -1252843 8.84 167729 13660 10058 6830 -198277 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 8.84 Embeded Length (ft)= 10.60 x the wall height= 2.65 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 94120 Depth (ft)= 4.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fy fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) 6 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 825 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 9 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 lb/ft 50 (0.66*fy) 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case .(LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft) 13.0 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 85836 Req'd Sec Mod= 31 LC2 LC3 8.25 12.07 39421 142795 14 52 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnalyticallCalculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 4 "ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS" Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 6 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -lb) Pal H 1 8960 2.67 23893 Psurch Surch 1 4480 4.00 17920 TOTAL 13440 41813 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 13440 Ib 41813 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V'd)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$'3*d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 41813 0 0 0 0 41813 1 55253 350 15 88 -288 55418 2 68693 1400 117 350 -2300 68260 3 82133 3150 394 788 -7763 78702 4 95573 5600 933 1400 -18400 85107 5 109013 8750 1823 2188 -35938 85836 6 122453 12600 3150 3150 -62100 79253 7 135893 17150 5002 4288 -98613 63720 8 149333 22400 7467 0 -147200 32000 9 162773 28350 10631 0 -209588 -7833 10 176213 35000 14583 0 -287500 -61703 11 189653 42350 19410 0 -382663 -131249 12 203093 50400 25200 0 -496800 -218107 13 216533 59150 32040 0 -631638 -323915 14 229973 68600 40017 0 -788900 -450310 15 243413 78750 49219 0 -970313 -598930 16 256853 89600 59733 0 -1177600 -771413 17.75 280373 110272 81555 0 -1607803 -1135603 18.5 290453 119788 92336 0 -1820342 -1317765 19.5 303893 133088 108134 0 -2131777 -1586662 8.827374769 160453 27273 10031 0 -197757 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 8.83 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 10.83 Embeded Length (ft)= 12.99 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 85836 x the wall height= 2.17 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 5 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 13440 0 0 0 0 13440 1 13440 700 44 175 -863 13496 2 13440 1400 175 350 -3450 11915 3 13440 2100 394 525 -7763 8696 4 13440 2800 700 700 -13800 3840 45 13440 3500 1094 875 -21563 -2654 6 13440 4200 1575 1050 -31050 -10785 7 13440 4900 2144 1225 -42263 -20554 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Walt A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 6 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 5040 2.00 10080 Psurch Surch 0 0 3.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 1894 3.00 5683 Ea E 0.7 1310 3.00 3931 TOTAL 8245 19694 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 8245 Ib 19694 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) (Md)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r *3"d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 19694 0 0 0 0 19694 1 27938 263 15 0 -288 27928 2 36183 1050 117 0 -2300 35050 3 44428 2363 394 0 -7763 39421 4 52672 4200 933 0 -18400 39406 5 60917 6563 1823 0 -35938 33365 6 69161 9450 3150 0 -62100 19661 7 77406 12863 5002 0 -98613 -3342 8 85651 16800 7467 0 -147200 -37283 9 93895 21263 10631 0 -209588 -83799 10 102140 26250 14583 0 -287500 -144527 11 110384 31763 19410 0 -382663 -221105 12 118629 37800 25200 0 -496800 -315171 13 126874 44363 32040 0 -631638 -428362 14 135118 51450 40017 0 -788900 -562315 15 143363 59063 49219 0 -970313 -718668 16 151607 67200 59733 0 -1177600 -899059 17 159852 75863 71648 0 -1412488 -1105125 18 168097 85050 85050 0 -1676700 -1338503 6.88 76406 12420 4746 0 -93572 0 d for Mtotai=0(ft)= 6.88 Embeded Length (ft)= 8.25 x the wall height= 1.38 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 39421 Depth (ft)= 3.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaUTA-SoldierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 6 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 5040 2.00 10080 Psurch Surch 1 3360 3.00 10080 Vimpact D 1 8000 8.25 66000 TOTAL 16400 86160 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 16400 Ib 86160 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V`d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((y+¢`3`d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 86160 0 0 0 0 86160 1 102560 263 15 88 -288 102637 2 118960 1050 117 350 -2300 118177 3 135360 2363 394 788 -7763 131141 4 151760 4200 933 1400 -18400 139893 5 168160 6563 1823 2188 -35938 142795 6 184560 9450 3150 3150 -62100 138210 7 200960 12863 5002 4288 -98613 124500 8 217360 16800 7467 0 -147200 94427 9 233760 21263 10631 0 -209588 56066 10 250160 26250 14583 0 -287500 3493 11 266560 31763 19410 0 -382663 -64930 12 282960 37800 25200 0 -496800 -150840 13 299360 44363 32040 0 -631638 -255875 14 315760 51450 40017 0 -788900 -381673 15 332160 59063 49219 0 -970313 -529871 16 348560 67200 59733 0 -1177600 -702107 17 364960 75863 71648 0 -1412488 -900017 18 381360 85050 85050 0 -1676700 -1125240 10.06 251104 26553 14837 0 -292494 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 10.06 Embeded Length (ft)= 12.07 x the wall height= 2.01 Mmax (ft -lb)= 142795 Depth (ft)= 5.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fy fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) 8 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 1100 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 12 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 Ib/ft 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 15.2 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 151677 Req'd Sec Mod= 55 LC2 LC3 10.72 13.82 87026 207836 32 76 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations Retaining Watls1AddressReviewComments1Wa11 AIWaItA-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 4 "ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS** Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 8 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 14000 3.33 46667 Psurch Surch 1 5600 5.00 28000 TOTAL 19600 74667 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 19600 Ib 74667 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below He M MPp (d) (Ord)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((rierdA3)/6) Mtotal 0 74667 0 0 0 0 74667 1 94267 438 15 88 -288 94519 2 113867 1750 117 350 -2300 113783 3 133467 3938 394 788 -7763 130823 4 153067 7000 933 1400 -18400 144000 5 172667 10938 1823 2188 -35938 151677 6 192267 15750 3150 0 -62100 149067 7 211867 21438 5002 0 -98613 139694 8 231467 28000 7467 0 -147200 119733 9 251067 35438 10631 0 -209588 87548 10 270667 43750 14583 0 -287500 41500 11 290267 52938 19410 0 -382663 -20048 12 309867 63000 25200 0 -496800 -98733 13 329467 73938 32040 0 -631638 -196194 14 349067 85750 40017 0 -788900 -314067 15 368667 98438 49219 0 -970313 -453990 16 388267 112000 59733 0 -1177600 -617600 17.75 422567 137840 81555 0 -1607803 -965842 18.5 437267 149734 92336 0 -1820342 -1141005 19.5 456867 166359 108134 0 -2131777 -1400417 10.70218213 284429 50110 17876 0 -352415 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 10.70 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 12.70 Embeded Length (ft)= 15.24 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 151677 x the wall height= 1.91 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 5 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 19600 0 0 0 0 19600 1 19600 875 44 175 -863 19831 2 19600 1750 175 350 -3450 18425 3 19600 2625 394 525 -7763 15381 4 19600 3500 700 700 -13800 10700 5 19600 4375 1094 875 -21563 4381 6 19600 5250 1575 0 -31050 -4625 7 19600 6125 2144 0 -42263 -14394 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 8 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pa1 H 1 8960 2.67 23893 Psurch Surch 0 0 4.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 2526 4.00 10102 Ea E 0.7 2330 4.00 9318 TOTAL 13815 43314 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotat=0 Load Type Factor H 1 13815 Ib 43314 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) «V*d)+M) MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$*3*d^3)16) Mtotal 0 43314 0 0 0 0 43314 1 57129 350 15 0 -288 57206 2 70945 1400 117 0 -2300 70161 3 84760 3150 394 0 -7763 80541 4 98575 5600 933 0 -18400 86708 5 112390 8750 1823 0 -35938 87026 6 126205 12600 3150 0 -62100 79855 7 140021 17150 5002 0 -98613 63560 8 153836 22400 7467 0 -147200 36502 9 167651 28350 10631 0 -209588 -2955 10 181466 35000 14583 0 -287500 -56451 11 195281 42350 19410 0 -382663 -125621 12 209097 50400 25200 0 -496800 -212103 13 222912 59150 32040 0 -631638 -317536 14 236727 68600 40017 0 -788900 -443556 15 250542 78750 49219 0 -970313 -591802 16 264357 89600 59733 0 -1177600 -763909 17 278173 101150 71648 0 -1412488 -961517 18 291988 113400 85050 0 -1676700 -1186262 8.94 166759 27945 10404 0 -205107 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 8.94 Embeded Length (ft)= 10.72 x the wall height= 1.34 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 87026 Depth (ft)= 5.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnalyticallCalculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WallA-SoldierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 8 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 8960 2.67 23893 Psurch Surch 1 4480 4.00 17920 Vimpact D 1 8000 10.25 82000 TOTAL 21440 123813 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') 21440 Ib 123813 ft -Ib Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$'3•d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 123813 0 0 0 0 123813 1 145253 350 15 88 -288 145418 2 166693 1400 117 350 -2300 166260 3 188133 3150 394 788 -7763 184702 4 209573 5600 933 1400 -18400 199107 5 231013 8750 1823 2188 -35938 207836 6 252453 12600 3150 0 -62100 206103 7 273893 17150 5002 0 -98613 197433 8 295333 22400 7467 0 -147200 178000 9 316773 28350 10631 0 -209588 146167 10 338213 35000 14583 0 -287500 100297 11 359653 42350 19410 0 -382663 38751 12 381093 50400 25200 0 -496800 -40107 13 402533 59150 32040 0 -631638 -137915 14 423973 68600 40017 0 -788900 -256310 15 445413 78750 49219 0 -970313 -396930 16 466853 89600 59733 0 -1177600 -561413 17 488293 101150 71648 0 -1412488 -751396 18 509733 113400 85050 0 -1676700 -968517 11.52 370805 46450 22296 0 -439550 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 11.52 Embeded Length (ft)= 13.82 x the wall height= 1.73 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 207836 Depth (ft)= 5.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fy It) Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) 10 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 1375 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 15 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 lb/ft 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 - 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 LC2 LC3 d(ft)= 17.5 13.18 15.67 Mmax(ft-lb)= 242190 162234 295067 Req'd Sec Mod= 88 59 107 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project1Data and Analytical\CalculationslRetaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wail A1WaliA-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 4 **ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS" Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 10 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 20160 4.00 80640 Psurch Surch 1 6720 6.00 40320 TOTAL 26880 120960 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 26880 Ib 120960 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M) MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$*3•d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 120960 0 0 0 0 120960 1 147840 525 15 88 -288 148180 2 174720 2100 117 350 -2300 174987 3 201600 4725 394 788 -7763 199744 4 228480 8400 933 0 -18400 219413 5 255360 13125 1823 0 -35938 234370 6 282240 18900 3150 0 -62100 242190 7 309120 25725 5002 0 -98613 241235 8 336000 33600 7467 0 -147200 229867 9 362880 42525 10631 0 -209588 206449 10 389760 52500 14583 0 -287500 169343 11 416640 63525 19410 0 -382663 116913 12 443520 75600 25200 0 -496800 47520 13 470400 88725 32040 0 -631638 -40473 14 497280 102900 40017 0 -788900 -148703 15 524160 118125 49219 0 -970313 -278809 16 551040 134400 59733 0 -1177600 -432427 17.75 598080 165408 81555 0 -1607803 -762760 18.5 618240 179681 92336 0 -1820342 -930085 12.5 456960 82031 28483 0 -561523 5951 12.56718227 458766 82915 28945 0 -570626 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ftj= 12.57 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 14.57 Embeded Length (ft)= 17.48 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 242190 x the wall height= 1.75 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 6 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 26880 0 0 0 0 26880 1 26880 1050 44 175 -863 27286 2 26880 2100 175 350 -3450 26055 3 26880 3150 394 525 -7763 23186 4 26880 4200 700 0 -13800 17980 5 26880 5250 1094 0 -21563 11661 6 26880 6300 1575 0 -31050 3705 12.5 26880 13125 6836 0 -134766 -87925 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\CalculationsBetaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaUTA-SoldierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 11=10 Calculate Base Reactions fat Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -ib) Pal H 1 14000 3.33 46667 Psurch Surch 0 0 5.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 3157 5.00 15785 Ea E 0.7 3640 5.00 18200 TOTAL 20797 80652 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 20797 lb 80652 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V'd)+Ml MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((rj'3*d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 80652 0 0 0 0 80652 1 101449 438 15 0 -288 101613 2 122246 1750 117 0 -2300 121812 3 143043 3938 394 0 -7763 139611 4 163840 7000 933 0 -18400 153373 5 184637 10938 1823 0 -35938 161460 6 205434 15750 3150 0 -62100 162234 7 226231 21438 5002 0 -98613 154058 8 247028 28000 7467 0 -147200 135294 9 267825 35438 10631 0 -209588 104306 10 288622 43750 14583 0 -287500 59455 11 309419 52938 19410 0 -382663 -896 12 330216 63000 25200 0 -496800 -78384 13 351013 73938 32040 0 -631638 -174648 14 371810 85750 40017 0 -788900 -291324 15 392607 98438 49219 0 -970313 -430050 16 413404 112000 59733 0 -1177600 -592463 17 434201 126438 71648 0 -1412488 -780201 18 454998 141750 85050 0 -1676700 -994902 10.99 309147 52812 19341 0 -381300 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 10.99 Embeded Length (ft)= 13.18 x the wall height= 1.32 Mmax (ft -lb)= 162234 Depth (ft)= 6.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion ProjecttData and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls1AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xts Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H=10 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 14000 3.33 46667 Psurch Surch 1 5600 5.00 28000 Vimpact D 1 8000 12.25 98000 TOTAL 27600 172667 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 27600 Ib 172667 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) (Ord)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r¢'3*d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 172667 0 0 0 0 172667 1 200267 438 15 88 -288 200519 2 227867 1750 117 350 -2300 227783 3 255467 3938 394 788 -7763 252823 4 283067 7000 933 0 -18400 272600 5 310667 10938 1823 0 -35938 287490 6 338267 15750 3150 0 -62100 295067 7 365867 21438 5002 0 -98613 293694 8 393467 28000 7467 0 -147200 281733 9 421067 35438 10631 0 -209588 257548 10 448667 43750 14583 0 -287500 219500 11 476267 52938 19410 0 -382663 165952 12 503867 63000 25200 0 -496800 95267 13 531467 73938 32040 0 -631638 5806 14 559067 85750 40017 0 -788900 -104067 15 586667 98438 49219 0 -970313 -235990 16 614267 112000 59733 0 -1177600 -391600 17 641867 126438 71648 0 -1412488 -572535 18 669467 141750 85050 0 -1676700 -780433 13.06 533069 74600 32471 0 -640140 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 13.06 Embeded Length (ft)= 15.67 x the wall height= 1.57 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 295067 Depth (ft)= 6.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 12 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 20160 4.00 80640 Psurch Surch 0 0 6.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 3788 6.00 22730 Ea E 0.7 5242 6.00 31450 TOTAL 29190 134820 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 29190 Ib 134820 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((ys$*3*d^3)16) Mtotal 0 134820 0 0 0 0 134820 1 164010 525 15 0 -288 164262 2 193200 2100 117 0 -2300 193117 3 222390 4725 394 0 -7763 219746 4 251580 8400 933 0 -18400 242513 5 280770 13125 1823 0 -35938 259780 6 309960 18900 3150 0 -62100 269910 7 339150 25725 5002 0 -98613 271265 8 368340 33600 7467 0 -147200 262207 9 397530 42525 10631 0 -209588 241099 10 426720 52500 14583 0 -287500 206303 11 455910 63525 19410 0 -382663 156183 12 485100 75600 25200 0 -496800 89100 13 514290 88725 32040 0 -631638 3417 14 543480 102900 40017 0 -788900 -102503 15 572670 118125 49219 0 -970313 -230299 16 601860 134400 59733 0 -1177600 -381607 17 631050 151725 71648 0 -1412488 -558065 18 660240 170100 85050 0 -1676700 -761310 13.04 515330 89212 32304 0 -636846 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 13.04 Embeded Length (ft)= 15.64 x the wall height= 1.30 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 271265 Depth (ft)= 7.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Wa11s1AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WalIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 12 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 20160 4.00 80640 Psurch Surch 1 6720 6.00 40320 Vimpact D 1 8000 14.25 114000 TOTAL 34880 234960 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') 34880 Ib 234960 ft -Ib Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*(1)+M) MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r+*3*d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 234960 0 0 0 0 234960 1 269840 525 15 88 -288 270180 2 304720 2100 117 0 -2300 304637 3 339600 4725 394 0 -7763 336956 4 374480 8400 933 0 -18400 365413 5 409360 13125 1823 0 -35938 388370 6 444240 18900 3150 0 -62100 404190 7 479120 25725 5002 0 -98613 411235 8 514000 33600 7467 0 -147200 407867 9 548880 42525 10631 0 -209588 392449 10 583760 52500 14583 0 -287500 363343 11 618640 63525 19410 0 -382663 318913 12 653520 75600 25200 0 -496800 257520 13 688400 88725 32040 0 -631638 177527 14 723280 102900 40017 0 -788900 77297 15 758160 118125 49219 0 -970313 -44809 16 793040 134400 59733 0 -1177600 -190427 17 827920 151725 71648 0 -1412488 -361195 18 862800 170100 85050 0 -1676700 -558750 14.65 746096 112740 45892 0 -904729 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 14.65 Embeded Length (ft)= 17.58 x the wall height= 1.47 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 411235 Depth (ft)= 7.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIIs\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Catculations Watt: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin Vimpact fy Wall A (1-5 Wall, Along Road A) fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Vimpact 14 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 1925 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 35 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 21 ft min pile depth per geotech 1000 Ib/ft 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 - 3 1 0 1 1 SUMMARY LC1 LC2 LC3 d(ft)= 21.9 18.10 19.55 Mmax(ft-lb)= 526293 420353 558640 Req'd Sec Mod= 191 153 203 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIlsAAddressReviewComments\Wall A\WallA-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 4 **ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS** Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 14 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 35840 5.33 191147 Psurch Surch 1 8960 8.00 71680 TOTAL 44800 262827 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 44800 Ib 262827 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) (((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((rf*3*d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 262827 0 0 0 0 262827 1 307627 700 15 0 -288 308054 2 352427 2800 117 0 -2300 353043 3 397227 6300 394 0 -7763 396158 4 442027 11200 933 0 -18400 435760 5 486827 17500 1823 0 -35938 470212 6 531627 25200 3150 0 -62100 497877 7 576427 34300 5002 0 -98613 517116 8 621227 44800 7467 0 -147200 526293 9 666027 56700 10631 0 -209588 523770 10 710827 70000 14583 0 -287500 507910 11 755627 84700 19410 0 -382663 477075 12 800427 100800 25200 0 -496800 429627 13 845227 118300 32040 0 -631638 363929 14 890027 137200 40017 0 -788900 278343 15 934827 157500 49219 0 -970313 171233 16 979627 179200 59733 0 -1177600 40960 17.75 1058027 220544 81555 0 -1607803 -247678 18.5 1091627 239575 92336 0 -1820342 -396804 19.5 1136427 266175 108134 0 -2131777 -621041 16.28073518 992204 185544 62933 0 -1240680 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 16.28 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.28 Embeded Length (ft)= 21.94 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Mmax (ft -lb)= 526293 x the wall height= 1.57 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 8 Find Vmax V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 44800 0 0 0 0 44800 1 44800 1400 44 0 -863 45381 2 44800 2800 175 0 -3450 44325 3 44800 4200 394 0 -7763 41631 4 44800 5600 700 0 -13800 37300 5 44800 7000 1094 0 -21563 31331 6 44800 8400 1575 0 -31050 23725 7 44800 9800 2144 0 -42263 14481 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walis\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WafIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 2 of 4 Load Case: 2 H= 14 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 27440 4.67 128053 Psurch Surch 0 0 7.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 4420 7.00 30939 Ea E 0.7 7134 7.00 49941 TOTAL 38994 208933 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 38994 Ib 208933 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V"d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r¢"3`d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 208933 0 0 0 0 208933 1 247927 613 15 0 -288 248267 2 286921 2450 117 0 -2300 287188 3 325915 5513 394 0 -7763 324059 4 364910 9800 933 0 -18400 357243 5 403904 15313 1823 0 -35938 385102 6 442898 22050 3150 0 -62100 405998 7 481892 30013 5002 0 -98613 418294 8 520886 39200 7467 0 -147200 420353 9 559881 49613 10631 0 -209588 410537 10 598875 61250 14583 0 -287500 387208 11 637869 74113 19410 0 -382663 348729 12 676863 88200 25200 0 -496800 293463 13 715857 103513 32040 0 -631638 219772 14 754852 120050 40017 0 -788900 126018 15 793846 137813 49219 0 -970313 10564 16 832840 156800 59733 0 -1177600 -128227 17 871834 177013 71648 0 -1412488 -291993 18 910828 198450 85050 0 -1676700 -482372 15.08 797069 139335 50037 0 -986441 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 15.08 Embeded Length (ft)= 18.10 x the wall height= 1.29 Mmax (ft -lb)= 420353 Depth (ft)= 8.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\CalculationslRetaining Walls'AddressReviewComments\Wall A\Wa1IA-SoldierPile.xls Page 3 of 4 Load Case: 3 H= 14 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 27440 4.67 128053 Psurch Surch 1 7840 7.00 54880 Vimpact D 1 8000 16.25 130000 TOTAL 43280 312933 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 43280 Ib 312933 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$`3*d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 312933 0 0 0 0 312933 1 356213 613 15 0 -288 356553 2 399493 2450 117 0 -2300 399760 3 442773 5513 394 0 -7763 440917 4 486053 9800 933 0 -18400 478387 5 529333 15313 1823 0 -35938 510531 6 572613 22050 3150 0 -62100 535713 7 615893 30013 5002 0 -98613 552295 8 659173 39200 7467 0 -147200 558640 9 702453 49613 10631 0 -209588 553110 10 745733 61250 14583 0 -287500 534067 11 789013 74113 19410 0 -382663 499874 12 832293 88200 25200 0 -496800 448893 13 875573 103513 32040 0 -631638 379488 14 918853 120050 40017 0 -788900 290020 15 962133 137813 49219 0 -970313 178852 16 1005413 156800 59733 0 -1177600 44347 17 1048693 177013 71648 0 -1412488 -115134 18 1091973 198450 85050 0 -1676700 -301227 16.29 1018173 162631 63096 0 -1243901 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 16.29 Embeded Length (ft)= 19.55 x the wall height= 1.40 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 558640 Depth (ft)= 8.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 4 RWB SD31 GA -6-(s106- IJES ( -N COMP. (JO& CHK. tt2-wc REV. DATE 7-21`O DATE DATE I-IZ"o8 PROJECT FILE NO PAGE I OF 3 PAGES TI M BUIL 6-&-n 1(t DES 1(>'tJ DESI(sfJ C21rEIZIA- s� J 14,4-0•4 (•••d = 3S P4 - S -u s rt o 0-4 = 6.514 *Lf -(-1() Svicktry' = 2' Sot L. 6 P Spkc,v1 LhA05 1Etsi v 19.511 efor d = IS ipp,= 3S(15) = SZS IIa /12 E ' G.S (16)(0.1) (06 16/k--1- = 6/ -z= 10 I6I f -i -t (70 fun (,o NTRo L S N6_514 L0 , d = 52s t 10 c9S I0Sr- XN P 6,S tt Pats, 1S W ttiy_ 11) , b- II Vo « pdivA-( Span - 61- (L2fo 0,33 I�- ' M - i-)= +13 n- • 16 6 8 Fib = Ft, CMCbCFCFL, CFCLCtCrCI+ Cn� f SO V14, = 0.85 (> (91. - tvDS 2,001 TAIL 4,4) CD, 10OLcl dura -4,1 = o.9 (p , eat+ ) Gg) S1 c � = I. to (1405 X00 I i tibl� 4:1-) Cr, -hw ni.r r = L o C, f, ) U Sc, i a c -+o r = 1. 1 (f,1 S 2 001 Sv 1°tPI,E M i Talk- +A) C , un(A50. B V (NQS TaiL 4. c) Ce. , = L p IWO SO31 1 IN ill (I\ A- wA-u., 0,G-<r(Ncr bCSt COMP. l.-- CHK. n REV. DATE 1-t - DATE %' Z1 -O 3 DATE PROJECT FILE 110 PAGE 'Z OF 3 PAGES FDr F -# I , ere, ss F61 = QiS (o.c ) (o.g)(t-t) (t.t)(o.&) F1 - i S IM 1- 0'13 1 - - t (as' ) 2036 • Sia — M 34= f2tL 2-03C (CO 31 ''"3 e 4A -'- U"t Fb 6,, SO It \DSO (6.es)(o-°s)(I-1) OA) (o.45) 1Ta p - S= Zo26(iz1 = 31 oThl 17S 31 (6� )1/1- -3 = = .93 C ,2 Chdk- 5KLa-c v= OS) (8f2)= x,380 (b FY = n800.5)..7.54 pSJ SS WO ot-. 5Li F b= TIC P ( NOS 4k) z" !2 SuArrLEMWT Cols* -rock Lip] RWB SD 31 ft1k' E[I( W eA, A taX cnJ COMP. (f1'1(- CHK. YZoW<- REV. DATE 5-3/-08 DATE -7- t"py DATE PROJECT &%I,) FILE NO PAGE 3 OF 3 PAGES 1 '1�f-r,�►. MAX 4-11( T Mg- Fe = 722 ISf i„z s= 11.25 (3.S)Z = 2;•o tri (,MGG irJcr- M= 112 16 (7:1103) = 165'83 = 1382 et -16 Ih1 138 2(2)= 2?6 3,S C -f / Sa 1 cif J, L.rt) Qikci-1 M = w� w - 8 (z7b9) - Hog 1b11c+ 8 (7.4)t 3511+70 t+ = 1,5' Use 441Z >b 9' , 6x 2 - N > RNB SD 31 X11' IiEft g0-17) NINGe (...rt -l- A COMP. LVICHK. REV. DATE 5-31•t7B DATE '7-ZA-oe' DATE PROJECT Ei614 LA -re FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES WM- -4 - C OniU -eTE Lo.LJ for 15' .ft.1 I = S. 5 1L/P-- (u✓ f io-Drcd " sc , C °�°�9 i rig oks i3 v = 59S' (1.6) SOP- = 95% ISIPr COOL W-1.1 44lLJZ tSs = 8" 516 O n{1✓CAMe.ot ,j; 9S2 16/pt- 1 J J J JJJ 4 4 Eqos M = Witt = 952 8)- = 5o77 N --IW 12 1Z 8' As rut- S_( - 04-2 A (3.i o CI4EcIc it ytir z In #G c l2 01s = ayy:�-,Z� Asn;,,,= O.0033 (sij(3) _ 0.12.zi o.00s6 0.17 th-z. v= 3810 15 0 d=3.5" c a.14( -o1C. CACI Io.c] < 0,44i,ti:.ci.. Lel-' 1.11. 2 4 t1W (0.7d ( 1 z) l 34 3989 Mo 3880 - oK 7 1 RW8 SO 31 t1 ER COUP. CHK. (L't-C REV. DATE 1'It'0ti DATE 7-21-4)9 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES HEADO Duos e '-€ S T = 9S2 -(6)z ?616 Ili 4= 0.61(613)(8)(1.4)=- 112616 EM aE.D Del = Cu slo" Dia goy. j A= 0•S11.,z Pct = 44) firc7 Acr 4[o.6S)( 4�. )00 (313) = 18.6 1A,6 7-b ok. T4 -v = 1 6,'6 4 la 4. = 0.31 0.31 z`1,Gt 3.6 1t" � re g.2 < 60 or . Pluo•n aE Z 51616 ItElotzp S APO% -4) 1-2-h Sr,4c.t4(1- taN Std. el -LES RMB SO 31 Ketkt ✓ c:rsak (,J wit 1 S . W /wL AJ, G COMP. We- CHK. 2'K REV. DATE 5,31•Q8 DATE 7'1-1`)9 DATE PROJECT 1 j u LACE FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES V floc tti I Mp ok O % Cavvf-d cApvc &Le rie.✓ th►c14,. 11- e, ct- = l000 l6 a7 2 ZS a6vw grnl 1 000 (,,(o) = 16CI) Ib Vc = 2,14m) (12)(3.$)(0, -Is) 398 y P /Loo = 199 psf - 2,388 Ps`' 12(0.4)1) 1600 CULS) = 3.6 ov 366v = .151 4(3.5) ( 00016 ipt- Z. is' # 5 a i2 (Az 0,3119 dk RW8 SD31 Acta ivy :.,� Uo41 Qui S n int ALA.- c. s h COMP. LMCr CHK, nom_ REV. DATE _1-10- 06 DATE %-7A `O'3 DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES Wittil, C. "(bP SLfa J J A I6 JJJJJJ Wco,c,- 1St 11- 8' A Fr - J J v J J J 4 • • a • • O s 4 1 6EAr Ft v- AT 6b11- Ew_ ' Conic%Ov�) p_EgArc (Nu coNsi`- JT) MD M.id sP _ 1911- P;c (� _ (i 0(5)-` + 8000 (8)) = 13`t10 14.15 Z`I 8 i`t 8 INS N 13HZ c�. tic ibnet. tt (TS) To 6,k -S Ash = 2-7-C_ 0.60 4 (b.$) 1 S\t 4 )� �t- 46\5\)(44.‘=-C157-0 P -1 b C 2 Govt wAt-L (li SrntLury AvALysis (i) coNcLtp 0E-stc,11 RW8 SD 31 L,i LA- A 12ETA' ONG- (.iA-i-L COMP. (-MG- CHK. REV. DATE S -Z7 -OB DATE 7-14-05 DATE PROJECT BOW LAKE. FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES WAu, A - (I Wv(TY WALL SEcnu J LOADS % 6aMET ( - SE -V se pSI T F't LDAP c91.cvi.ATION $ SIMPLlTY A'N4L,Y&I S PE I----ZjP For- AnkSJ nc.rt- &ss IP Jv f wt 14O rc.f 1 King County SWMD BLPTF Retaining Wall Stability Analysis Wall: Wall A - Gravity L Wall Geometry HSOIL 2.75 ft Depth of soil above heel DEPTH 1.5 ft Finished grade to bottom of base H 4.25 ft TOP 2.50 ft Top of core wall thickness BOTTOM 3.50 ft Bottom of core wall thickness SCULPT 0.25 ft Thickenss of sculpted concrete WCONC 140 pcf Weight of Concrete per cf Soil Properties SUW 135 pcf Soil unit weight FA 36 degrees Friction angle EFWA 35 pcf Equivalent fluid weight, active S 6.5 H Seismic factor (uniform load, full height) SURCH 2 ft Traffic surcharge (equivalent soil depth) EFWP 230 pcf Equivalent fluid weight, passive Ex 0.41 Seismic coefficient FC 0.45 sliding friction coefficient (no FS) Loads Wblock 1488 Ib/ft Wwedge 298 Wsoil 287 Pa 316 lb/ft Psurch 298 Ib/ft Pe 117 Ib/ft Pp 259 Ib/ft Equations Used Pa _ Kayff2 _ EFWA x H2 2 2 P=70H Pe=6.5HxH Ez= SA. xW=0.41xW Kp y x DEPTH 2 EFWP x DEPTH' Pp = 2 2 Stability Factors of Safety FS Resultant Load Case Sliding Location FS -Normal 1.5 mid 1/3 FS -Unusual 1.33 mid 1/2 FS -Earthquake 1.1 within base a = M E V BASE e = a 2 _ P+M _V t 6Ve `2 A S B 2V 6 = — 3a V Sliding = FC x H B 2 (inside mid 1/3) (outside mid 1/3) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WattslAddressReviewComments\Wali A\WaIIA-GravityWall-rev.xls Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic Normal ASCE Load Load Case Case (LC) D E H L Passive W Surch 2.4.1-2 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 1 0 0 2.4.1-3 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Results Summary Stability Analysis LC 1 Max Min Resultant Resultant Load Case Bearing Bearing in Mid 1/3? in Mid 1/2? FS Sliding sME;, j<. :28r :,,4 : , Pw-Yi 'mx.. c .4 Yes,a `..152 j 2 1313 _0 Noy Yes 1.53 �i. i�. -..ur'a.'�i:_:..� . Y,�i:��`.�3�s.� ...aj+.9a.iiw` x �`S.�=a.E (moments about point "A") Horz Load Vert Arm Arm Moment Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) (ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -lb) Wblock D 1 1488 1.25 1859 Wwedge D 1 298 2.83 843 Wsoil D 1 287 3.17 908 Pa H 1 -316 1.42 -448 Psurch Surch 1 -298 2.13 -632 Pe E 0 0 2.13 0 Ex -block E 0 0 2.13 0 Ex -wedge E 0 0 1.42 0 Ex -sculpted E 0 0 2.13 0 Pp Passive 0 0 0.50 0 Totals 2072 -614 2531 a 1.22 e 0.53 middle 1/3 0.58 middle 1/2 0.88 resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing 1128 56 sliding 1.52 R:\Seattie111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaIIA-GravityWall-rev.xls Stability Analysis cont'd LC 2 (moments about point "A") Horz Load Vert Arm Arm Moment Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) (ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wblock D 1 1488 1.25 1859 Wwedge D 1 298 2.83 843 Wsoil D 1 287 3.17 908 Pa H 1 -316 1.42 -448 Psurch Surch 0 0 2.13 0 Pe E 0.7 -82 2.13 -175 Ex -block E 0.7 -427 2.13 -907 Ex -wedge E 0.7 -85 1.42 -121 Ex -sculpted E 0.7 43 2.13 91 Pp Passive 1 259 0.50 129 Totals 2072 -609 2180 a 1.05 e 0.70 middle 1/3 0.58 middle 1/2 0.88 resultant in mid 1/3? No resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing 1313 0 sliding 1.53 LC 3 (moments about point "A") Horz Load Vert Arm Arm Moment Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) (ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wblock D 1 1488 1.25 1859 Wwedge D 1 298 2.83 843 Wsoil D 1 287 3.17 908 Pa H 1 -316 1.42 -448 Psurch Surch 1 -298 2.13 -632 Pe E 0 0 2.13 0 Ex -block E 0 0 2.13 0 Ex -wedge E 0 0 1.42 0 Ex -sculpted E 0 0 2.13 0 Pp Passive 1 259 0.50 129 Totals 2072 -355 2660 a 1.28 e 0.47 middle 1/3 0.58 middle 1/2 0.88 resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing 1065 119 sliding 2.63 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project1Data and AnalyticallCalculations\Retaining WallslAddressReviewComments\Wall A\WaUTA-GravityWall-rev.xls RWB SO 31 R11JjECl( eEnkiNIt'JCr WA -\.l. A- &L Jt Y Waw CANcgeTC- COMP. l.tA CHK. R w 4_ REV. DATE s''11' OS DATE 1-1.4 -05 DATE PROJECT R (.AK C FILE HO PAGE OF PAGES DOT, rriirye, fri)n(r^ n set. 4 ay. d ft meex-‘,w rc,t. Nit y4 • For woktis aAd sk( i,ad}h 13ijck-v . ) 21 � use, I2' ACM, O. OblS = 0,26 in' S a7 12 Et^)Each [AG' 31$ 1, 12,1.1-1 CI. W CO A N LL _m N co A o • C o a) H to C J m mcc3 Wall Geometry o) m w C N O E O O o t1 -o O L o O - m a) m A D. O)O)O« mY o N o Ea_ o m m c m N o) N 43 m E N 0 C'a).c m 2 0 0 a) (1) m m ..- .._ a ..- ..- = = = ==== == n nv manS= NtnN)nOP�MO )AtaOa7)ON a -0O t000 M Olc! (20(W)tn ()C)C) — • at0a Nc)tn e-11,-�� OCO coinM U DF= -J2 W00 QQ 0 n .--I wwiW--0<1U 0Q : x 0 SS US(/)1-ml-> U)ILWWU)U)W>LL. Soil Properties Eco 333 Assumptions Ignore passive due to sloping ground above toe. 7 1- t 0 Load Factor Matrix —J I w 0 $ 06 0 -j 0 k 0 0 000 00- 0 N— 0 0 /2? 4¥4 wwwCsi 1:5 E 0 \ E # ± / 2»m 2 1)E»5 00> CC 4§ 0 a- 13 ■ • ■ §=022 2 § Lo ■ Load Case N 11 0 la 0 U O) U) O Nu) CO y e- 0 c O m• OOOI "J W W W t-ONQ) 0 0 CD 0 O? o J �.. tri p ' ' >- >- } to C) .c O c CO 0_ x l0 LL U u) 7 0 to /0 m f0 m cc 4 �Oa00to E O' N CO cn )) cNi c f) E O • -tot0 2 0 U m - 1- CO 1, Mfg N C7 U) V- Ili . N O • M O O O c) O N c ,- N 1. O b - X re (0 C 0 m N(� to O cc) O 0 eo I 3. To CO 0 0 0 0_ W W W co m $ et Q Q Q CO m m m m Construction, LC 0 xx (0 mMN C-•Nh co 0) v- M N Nc cCC E m m t �rn 33 :0 EES � -aa) ali -5a)— `m u) R. EE .0 faccw o 03 M -J�3>3aa www vo 0 5 7 o N E E ch co co0 O 9 N 0) N 9 Q_' Seismic, LC 2 CQ 0 r.0000Ot[7 NCV a) O CO CO r p p tC7 O O `L .fO COO N E1 N M X Ca E h 1� CIO C� C` ) t••- a- CO r r tD LO CO Cr) CO • p p Ch C07 N 1 N q 1 O S . Lo00 Cn • CY) CO • LO ti 0 • r 0 0 f` I's. ~ 000 L 0001 L_J W Win ECa = h O CnCn —VO aoi • NCAaQ 45 •0awww O CON COrNO (� r al Gl M N N-• r m 0 13 "O E E >.• • >- } CO N e- V" Cr) N r r E E c c CD • al 7 N (n o N within base? 0) CO C C cu C f0 w Q 0 7 � � CD CO 000 aa)) E T tO to 0 A • CDNM� oho E 2 co E 0 U 3 a) 4 1- co f` r r 0 1- M 1 --cc jol N M 11) ,- to N O ai o o 5 N lO 0) CO O Fs N co �N0000et c r- 11 a) ce C o tC XI ,r) O 9 r co ,- - N. 0 co 0 i M 0 SSl9 O _N (O17 ai 000 W W W 0 m W Q Qco N m Q m m o 11 4) _ "o C V Ml!)ON o N (n oMD r o O ...000I J W W W N N rn Z N N 0 J (V . i c V a L (0 NMN C' CN- C - 0) V) MN_ N C CCD) Ir N ` 1- N N (0 (9 m -C U 3, 0 ) m E N U C _a J N N t6 to N C C ,== 0 y 5 y 7 d y •.- RI m J���dd �W W WFO- m o jj o N h N m coO 9 N coco 4) 4) V. Impact, LC 3 Ir m m • ca N 'U T LL R21- a co � • m 0 U LL c C) a. ▪ CO Ymc3 Wall Geometry CL 'Oo o -p mL_ rn = a) ki w y LLL tI)CD E -0 C C C U 7 CD CD O co (n o c c O 0) 29- o 0 L L _.= U 00� p) p) a -0 o c c ca a) ons 33vo000 O (A ih 'U + U C! a) = 7 O N m C o 7, c- w. L Q) c o C) V U D a o 7 w 0 7 CD f� (n 0 m m m ° v E rn° aci w e c c �• o m w c) a) coEo) woom o-cQQa)2oa):2 ii rlI rv)HF-m v) LL LULUC/)H(1)> ' cn 0 0 0 U a) • U U a= a av a ar 4 9 et (t) N to O f- N M O ([f (0 0 0) 1C) N N- 0 l NOco. 0)M)f) M MM'-ts ,.0 NI. (D v- c O Ua QQ a aWWWOQ=U U_ U_ Dx IIOI Q I-� (/)U - WW WW>LL. Soil Properties a U z O U U Z O J � _ = V1 147 LU I--Qw U) m r E "(10) cn 0 (n Ignore passive due to sloping ground above toe. Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) �c EE± \CO\vs/ �ffa $// g -J . Load Factor Matrix Passive Surch -J LU 0 000 000 00� o cv) _9 _9 g_ \44 C1 & & 2 0 ■ • in Mid 1/2? .1 0 c ƒƒk C�kc0 e t. Q eh E s.vr- ocorn0000c,2 to h- (O O CO h- W (- M 1� co 1` (O (D Cr) CO NMNI-NMD I,- M O O O O tILO r 1.0 N CO Q) 0 r -M N CO td O N_ (D st u 0000 W W L7l (0 m 2mm 0 L O c• acao' 3JW W W �0 t- }}o co } • N J (/)c7 O 0 O N Cr) N h (�• ('- 0) 0) 11-- CO N N ` C m N ,- - (0 co '0 -0 U L m N .0 N (A —03 8 0 ••-• N L N E E C C w (6 y 7 Q r 3 3 cLc.�www,-Q c c Construction, LC resulta resulta R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall B\WaIIB-SouthScaleFacilityWall.xls Seismic, LC 2 t Q C02 C) w .0 r' t' (0O M `4t r, (h to E G in T4 �00004p(0(O 0 xiN 00 co r N2 co E (000otiCOI's cor` N4rNrNc,O CO J r U � rn co co ppNNO)M Cr) Cr) 1 1 O x N CO CO 0 r 01 N CO 0 O • 0 0 0 •0 0 LL 0 O O O I" J W W E N h EN— U O «) W • h c y C CO h L To 0CU Z 0 aa �wwwi-- (0 W W 2mmm (0 co O to co h h Q) C) N N r t- N N N r (O >- >- >- co co NMN r r _N N E E (� (� �. 0) 0) N N C C - 1— co N • V -0 0 h e .E C C CL CU • O 7 7 h V. Impact, LC 3 Q Q ATro rnIn o4t--aco,n000^ �Nv; °Q°1; ao CnaCOr0OrCOr V' CO r- Co 60 CO C) Co a caV) C5 � 0000c0 0 x - in T o) .- - — N CO CA 0 00 -, 1- N m O O O o W 0 J430001 J W W W er _ n ) V ca N CO VY W W W M m m m C'7 Com) to C+) co c•o r T T T T Z } } O CO CO CD C" ) N C'• C- r• 0) 0) 1- C)N 0c C 0 0 T T CO CO 76 10 :a/ U'a m 4 L« E N U U E E C U as w E E C C w -0 CD -(1)) L m C0.0 -.i 0.a �wwz. wFO- 01 m U) P2 m HLd3a 0 Sf1ldH Wall Geometry 110SH H )IJIH1 La Lai -..6 t0, O) 0. m413 N m = v) 2) — O U) m N w V) Li. co 4) 1 U C 0 in O(J 7 m 0 .o N m U O 00 C o O) 0'E m 7 cr O. N m -'0- O4-' leo U o m 0 L 3 3 j N m 0 m co O) V) Dm U o E ▪ d ® CD Q1 N 7 7 0 m C m mom= _ .00) 00oao IO D0 C .- a) N U U) U w To y E N N yU 5 5 .N c2� N L • O1 U.iU-ifnHF-m U) ll. W W U)HU)>cnn H P2 Ca 44— c0 NNOtitiMO ir)coNO)IAN�OICI M O <O MMI • et O et r r ti O c O U �I--J2 wc0 awwwpQ=U =2OSv)HmH� Soil Properties < Qm U 2- D D < u... i : x E (I)fLW Wv)v)W>LL. 0 J 0 U z 0 0 z co 0 =U0 H � W J CO W (1) CO 2 Assumptions Ignore passive due to sloping ground above toe. Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) 0 R c o m am w4 -w aaa 00 0 C) NI' LO U m co N ca � E To O o c 0 J Z D 66 chU. LL tz Load Factor Matrix Passive Surch J W 0 000 0 0 0 r- 1- 1- N M N In (V 2 r r vav N N N -0 ca rn o (1) LL C H 19 N h -313000 m2}}} c .. c- c c M ate+ t- us us -7 m m c CN1 00c 2 m � co m RC N tO CV) CO 03 r- 0 N C m O 0 0 ?NE a m E C o , � U N cry c8 � II c0 = Page 13 of 20 «Q =N CO ) CD O 0 4 p_ O CI)N GOO O O O O c)) 0 .12 M in N I 2 co N. Q)N 1-GON.Mf. In CA 't? co. in. CO CO CO N CO 4 N M co M't O M M " O O O O I O Z C N CO 'V' 0 r T- V- CO CO 0 O w CCI W O O O O 13 O v p y a 0 a I m J W W W J ro (I) 0 CO O O 0) MN 04 CO CD CD N m )- } N CO C6 0 CO N C'- Com- h 0) 0) m m N- V- Co to E O U n co y E O L O N cr,in E E C C .. '0 C4 a] •6 ,_ N u) L co L t0 n L co 7 0 - co w 3 3�3�a www IO coo coo 0 > J co 0) N a) C O U 7 N 0 U co 6 0 0 N to To Eli co C. Q cp c cocr) .... xi N co OM c E 7 7MO)NMCVOOQC)N~ t O m O.. �(n,N ,-NO E N 2 co 0 3 0 0 Er --Q) N Tr ti GO 1` M 1� + r- co 0) '1 (0 (1) ( c ) (0 di e 1 N M N M O) M 4 O v 3 a) To' O r O coc OOONY I" c•6 :c m CC cc 0 a l0 .0Nc07•zt 0 o 0 L. N- 1 -CO CCO U 'S. GmG O N ..0....4:. co v �'r ▪ r r00000 W W W N 0 O co .2 CD 2 mmm0 II 0 x -13 O O 0 N () N ti co m m M 0 O m❑❑❑ S > ..J W W W r m J W 0 M O '— '- }}} r r c 0 K COlt m N ) N cn r ( m 0)C ctCO .0 O) N r r CO (Oa) O O 0 P LI jaw N Je J E O t w v vc E E C co— V U w (O E C c c w p CD (O O (O fn O m O�.0W =0. 3 0 .°���aa Ewwti°- CO CO o N M co0 O 9 m coco 0 m N Seismic, LC 2 tY V. Impact, LC 3 C Q 7 .0 O2 as 2 4 O 2 O CN N O N OOp co Co 0 0 M M to (1 1 N Is O N Mr I's CO CO h In O Mt. CD 1.0CO. M (D N M N M O M sr O M O M O O O O N C tf) 0 In O N CO O t' .1-.- M <O m r L O 0 0 1�. O U yCCIaI 6.JWWW J U r 0000 O CO. N I� r r r r Z } } 0 M N N N (1) CO N C' Com- C.- 0) 0) ems- CO N 0) C C rn•c N m r r l0 O) • E m v v 2 175 'O 0) co Cp E E C •C ����aawww- � m m CO to 0) 0) L L HLd30 • 110SH H not WJ 2 h 0 — O u)N a) .7-- to LL L > F C 0 fl co 0 7 W O 0 co y > C O O O € 'j m w m L L • •V • G • C N 0 o COmo° w 3 3�ma,a 2 0 rn au vv 0 E m C m O 0 D D 0 03 E C O ci) 6 -«YL oY "a> = a o.o ..61) ii) cn03..G'`• 033 8 E Tja m E 0 o o m o •c Q Q CO m 0 0-= LL=tLICOF-F-m (/) LI- W W V)F-c/)> rn m 0 O N O O s= n 8_ 13 a a= to N to O P N- M 0 N t0 to 0) to N e• 0 to M O N NM , 0W -Mtn M'V'0et (Oc`lr- 03 e- e- ti e- O O O o U Z (n I t a) .Jc1wwwc))00 QQ a c p IIOIcnii-mI--> 0 u.wwcnc=nw>u.. Soil Properties w 0 Assumptions Ignore passive due to sloping ground above toe. Page 16 of 20 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall B\WallB-SouthScaleFacilityWall.xls Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) w w w c▪ o • c a a a 0 000 Q • mvvl"n Z C • al • n O V U '0 C to ooEE:-E. 3 • Load Factor Matrix Passive Surch J W 0 m N co V U W 0 -J W 0 m J IL/ CU V r- O O O O O O O O O O 0 O r N N In N N N N N 0E c co a E o E 7 U CO y E T.5 C N L co 0(0> d' in Mid 1/2? » Z 1 0 }>z 2'-ccooco v0 m x c m 2 (0 m m CO030 r- r ch 0 (0 • U .C2 2 v m 'm — C N J• U(NiG,") c it x Page 17 of 20 r00 O VQ? (.4 N6N000ON N to cr) I N )- O N 0 O ,O c0 f- �+ co Q) r f-- )-- 4 co Ncwi4ch4`OO r co 0000N 07 r i 0000 N 1t) O N CO O L Oros) yOOO2 1- W W cp C•1 Criirs O r r V E m cogm m o '5 a 0 In 4o m O m -J5 0.0_ �wwwf°— Construction, LC cd N N r r CD m EE } } } (N c0 r -,- c- c'• c- cs- 0) 0 CO N N c c - __-_--co co �_ :t3'a.o m N E C .c c c cc3 m cu to 0) °_) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Walt B1Wal1B-SouthScaleFacitityWall.xls Seismic, LC 2 C Q E0 7 .0 O 2 4 2 co NO"'N 00) so co,_t0.—OOO1s- co ~tet cn t n N t o N N N N t� IANQ)0)�0)t01- tnO�f� V* CD a N M M to O ✓ 0 M ON U) CD co 0 f� Nt 0 N ✓ r to CO - X00000 t0 m CO W W W 4 Q<< 2 m m m V 0 L CD 0 O 0 C CI 0= j-1 W W W co Cp�Nti 0 m tq N J 4 (Ni O .-- }}} co 0 N 0MN c- c- N 0) 0) r r.. Cr, N ` C_ CD 0 t0 N O �_ C) v) � v v E E .� .0 C C _18 S15- aa Ea www g `)m with R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls'AddressReviewComments\Wall B\WaUIB-SouthScaleFacilityWall.xls V. Impact, LC 3 0 E r 0 1 O w O O W O O • 0 W U in 00 0 0 N (0�1 NN_ON00OOOa M to Nin M r 1� O N 07 O (h CO CO 1- ✓ to O r 1� 00 h tO N CC) C) UC) O r cO0�0000N tQ t7 CO• CO •ch0 • tf) CO 0 0 0 0 0 0= j J W W W U) E m EN -5 1-; m00 -oa)to5 ea wae*O. o fA L N J a d E WWW H O en CO�007 N • Z Z 0l C r r (w (�)N E E c c C C 0 3 3 co co N Cs- CO 0) O C C_ O t0 '6 0 .N c .0 3 Page 20 of 20 R:1Seattie111-00838-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallskAddressReviewCommentslWall B1WaIlB-SouthScaleFacilityWall.xls RW8 SD 31 F11 !E[1( R�ta'ir i t1 30ll S CI)rc,rt-iti p ti, COMP. l '' CHK. REV. DATE C:3- og DATE i-Zl'o3 DATE PROJECT QOL-0 LI -LA -- FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES STEM DCS Vit -1 C SEE AMA cEtED mat V 8- M C A t.Gv t,Ar'i1 oN S 1 Foy (vvo. 8' , A TAA) M 7- 4d 24.8 = 0.66 i ►,2" (9.S) -It6aD.6 (0.081v2) M6.x l,,all %�,;i1 t �� fit � t,.�-t i� (pC Iz.) f�1v O.19 (`0 (9.S)f- m Roe (tit (.1,M -(„' F = C.1 16,1 = 0.43 i'- LI(9.S) 16.3 Ey.- v . dowtils d ov I2db Uparok wNLrc no 1+h rw.ated 5,7 i- 9.s/lL= 6,5 #fi6aIZ IS=O" (E0041"0‹...) 2"#6LAT (941l1. Itba6 olwl (6W.k,) Cvmcv-- She. c1\ln 0.1S (Z)44m p.iS(_' r (iz)('s) = (08(i I1 vv = 4-25g < l utpl 4 .. o [A< -t 3t8 9.3.2.1] King County SWMD BLPTF Retaining Wall Concrete Design Wall: South Scale Facility Wall - Wall B Stem Design (moments about point "B") LC 3, V. Impact Hconc 8 (maximum wall height) Arm Moment Load Load Category Factor Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa H 1.6 -1792 2.67 -4779 Psurch Surch 1.6 -896 4.00 -3584 Impact L 1.6 -1600 10.25 -16400 Totals -4288 -24763 Hcutoff 5.7 Arm Moment Load Load Category Factor Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa H 1.6 -917 1.91 -1749 Psurch Surch 1.6 -641 2.86 -1834 Impact L 1.6 -1600 7.97 -12757 Totals -3158 -16340 rc h Impact . n — Wstem Exstem Wso]l Wbase R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall B1WaIIB-SouthScaleFacilityWall.xls [Concrete Design] RW8 SD 31 liT8E[I( gal( ���: (,/ 4.11 Otts5h 0_1( C 9►'L+"L��+ COMP. Coo- CHK. REV. DATE 6-303 DATE 7-74-°0 DATE PROJECT Po—) Lc FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES S -mm (Ex.Pos FACE ) AS L,i.1 Ctt r) v .0018 (I2) i11 0 ..25 ik2" S 2- (0, 33 i.-19 Asr:,., (4toty ) = 0.0033 ( S) CAc,I t3 Io -s] 0.38 gr #- 2- ( 0 ) exe DLc..ak. 4;( (A •f d c)L. BA s- Hu.l (-bP b•xs) _9 D �1Js4q Ew 1.33 [ISb(1.1)) } `a(13s)301 = (191 V = we = I19((5): 8956 16 M' 1791 (T t -7 22388 4 -Ib z J,JJ✓J1 J J J j ASnm ` Mu = Z2.9 _ 0,`iL tnZ #6 Z12 ff clex,vrt, 44 9 (13.5) /-sr;w,L= 0.00 33 ( (-1-) 03,s-) At n,.� ks- ' tj j 6 t G C,'i (1 c) _ 0,34 l^Z -A, o.11 • 5 X12 Rif E C ly Qc iv►tri WA" C4SiS`, Lida' 9 c bw COMP. id" e-- CHK. t2 -44,L. REV. DATE (0 3 Oe DATE 7"1.-"Q/ DATE PROJECT 801...) FILE NO PAGE OF PAGE: BASE Tc ( Butter -1 east ) t,G 3 (v. IrAeAck ) 0b3 — (040(1.tO) = Z921 (4-% v = 2911 (1.0) + 7.14,(40b3 -- Z9 .* 1,0) 2 46813 +- 696 5?6lb ►A, = ac) -1.1 (1. ,)1".1- 815 (2)(1.0) Z 3 = 11°81+ (cY' S08 -- I6 AJul = fAv = 5,1 0 , I 9d (Izis) As rN-u,- N i-- 6.2! —1 (sw ked cc,A cQ l c.'I• i svxs 2911 ....Z8S50.14) _ g003 Oe v -e l o f r-ioxf it 5 = Z3.8 1-1.60 k Gof10 r 64,-- 4 . 9 n N c 0 0 2 O � V c V 7 CO 0 U H 11 u 03a = Y m () Vehlmp I Ewall N - Qv Cr / / / C (north/east access road) • QlH N1 w Q C / ✓ / N / ,0t=/ 1 P / . • A a d w ▪ co N 0 O [1 O a Q) c • = Y Oa) p)"' y V U _ U t0 - >• 7 76 o _a 'Q c • m U E - U to "- c` V O O xi a Cr) C O d E «O . a > U U E E rna«▪ Eca rnQ :�--()figNy a) m y o n N E U U U co co a) a) L D -a 'O 0 U 3 Co co co Cl 0. V) V) tn CI- V Vvvvv aL aaaa. aaax x t17Oa0MtC)M 00d't- f-NOOU)'- M O MMM cT N N.- 0 0 N z LL 'S m 0 c m 8 J Q = d O . -a 0) 0) <<<CL LL LL. LL_ LL. LL x W W W W W U) U) Load Factor Matrix L 1 - CO J w 0 co HU J al U -J- '-0'- 000 0 0 r •- O O r N C+) vvv N N 0, U m 7) E E O U a) d '5 a) 0 0 v g t0 O c c .(0 0) 17)c O (0 U_ (0 (0 c •0 (0 (00 (0 0 O d c O .y c (0 0 W to 1- F- (0 J 0 m O N O O N (0 0 0) O 0) a) 0 • a) (00 a)) m y as Q a) l L 7-7,t v9 Wall C Pile Design Summary Tie Back Piles Wall Height ft) Pile Depth (ft) Tie Rod Tension (Ib) Maximum Moment (k -ft) Sreq Section 1(in4) W (Pa) S (in3) :3 , 14 ` 2J'< 22 l4 204*v 56555 _ v 3i3.:i ,. y 313 W,:a- :r .. z.: V 464 :' t X114. ' .._ 114 '.4`c 139 '� :4. ,�. :.•..-�r:ic:. 169 i ..:w� rte; 238 y . W1?x58v.. W12x58 4 R 475 1'43 ),T§i• 78 i x, �:_} m:,,L:..;--,W7' 16 , ; Y 22 , ,59964- ne...1,.nx 57414 . :a_ 18 6 •J✓. = .p.,._ W18x76 + Ill `8x86 r, W18x97 `. =133 ° 146 1330 ...c+C 71 .swnc.d.. 146 - t-tll ' •4 18 1:45'!:e:', v 26 g72628.1"10: 71586 .... 7 v 654 .1 1750 , , � ? 6 188 Cantilever Piles Wall Height Pile Depth Maximum Moment A 1nxi?, ,it''i�''s.5'x!'v.•tti Wall W (Pa) (ft (ft) k -ft) Sreq BLANK Section 1(0, S (tn3) 1'43 rt.Vta:11Sn , S:ab 'Y.�.i '1,.� , •.Cc' ,�l sL - ��. x6• �., AI. •7Yr 4 22 195 ...c+C 71 W12x58 475 78 1! '.-� ,AZ.127 • k'''''' •74''s°.� °� .{u 'Y, s7 ;,1•1'P • p}F i' .. �k • 8 22 380 138 W18x76 1330 146 12 26 683 248 W18x130 2460 256 Deflection for Vehicle Impact + Surcharge (LC3) 3 4 6 8 10 12 1.332 2.368 5.328 9.472 14.8 21.312 Pile Dations 1.741 E-07 7.335E-07 1.989E-06 8.382E-06 1.554E-05 3.441E-05 0.049 3.626E-08 0.049 1.146E-07 0.049 2.072E-07 0.049 6.549E-07 0.049 9.71E-07 0.049 1.792E-06 Section 15111 A 1nxi?, ,it''i�''s.5'x!'v.•tti Wall W (Pa) A(Pa) w (Psurch) (Psurch) A (Vimpact) Height (ft) (k) (in) (k/in) (in) (in) 3 4 6 8 10 12 1.332 2.368 5.328 9.472 14.8 21.312 Pile Dations 1.741 E-07 7.335E-07 1.989E-06 8.382E-06 1.554E-05 3.441E-05 0.049 3.626E-08 0.049 1.146E-07 0.049 2.072E-07 0.049 6.549E-07 0.049 9.71E-07 0.049 1.792E-06 Section 15111 +,d, :....Qy R ., 1nxi?, ,it''i�''s.5'x!'v.•tti W12x65 533 88 , W18x76 1330 146 , • •6 530 x6• �., g W 18x97 1750 188 1t11le, 1! '.-� b? :2311,',' `r W18x130 2460 256 8 A Total (in) 2.1E-07 8.5E-07 2.2E-06 9E-06 1.7E-05 3.6E-05 Hc= Summary 3 LC2- LC3 d(ft)= 13.15 17.62 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 0 153860 Sreq'd (in3)= 0 56 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 3 Load Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 1332 11.0 14652 Pa2 H 1 3330 5.0 16650 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 1776 11.5 20424 Psurch2 Surch 1 2220 5.0 11100 Impact L 1 8000 15.3 122000 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 -4792 143326 Base Reactions Shear(V) -4792 Moment at A (M') 143326 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Total Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 14.69 120868 15847 1647 -105424 -32938 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 14.69 Embeded Length (ft)= 17.62 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Mmax (ft -Ib)= 153860 (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglaciai-7-01.xlsCantilever-3 Hc= 3 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Load Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment RISA Input Pal H 1 1332 11.0 14652 888 Pa2 H 1 3330 5.0 16650 333 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 1110 Esoil1 E 0.7 328 11.5 3767 109.2 Esoil2 E 0.7 410 5.0 2048 40.95 EwaII E 0.7 904 14.8 13335 258 EwaII2 E 0.7 775 11.5 8911 258 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 -3600 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 -3600 -14372 17863 Base Reactions Shear(V) -14372 Moment at A (M') 17863 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 10.96 4042 667 14 -4439 -285 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 10.96 Embeded Length (ft)= 13.15 Mmax (ft -ib)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:1SeattIe111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIlslAddressReviewComments\Wall C\WalIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01. xlsCantilever-3 rzi±L x 3 Results for LC ,t Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 10:43 AM C W aII-cantilever-3ft-N+Surch+Imp.... Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 10:43 AM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures 7 fftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 ... .. . ,,,..,.,,... 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -3 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -13 0 0 5 N5 0 -17.69 0 0 Pp1+9p2 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in] N5 Reaction Y Win] Reaction Z [k/iin] Reaction X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot [k-ft/rad Reaction Reaction j Z Rot.[k-ft/rad] Footing Reaction 2 N1 Basic Load Cases Point • 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 -..-...-. �....-._... .888 ........ ...v................vi 0 �.... �vw..v..�...I %100 ..2. 3 X .333 2 ;Surch: RsurGJYt+-FRsurch2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Pp1+9p2 None 2 7 Pp3+PD4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) e 0 1 M2 X 0 -..-...-. �....-._... .888 ........ ...v................vi 0 �.... �vw..v..�...I %100 ..2. . M3 X .333 .385 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) r �aoei uirectron Start Magnituderk/ft deal End Magnitud Start Locationlft 0 1 M2 X .592 .592 0 0 2 1113 X .592 .592. :0 •0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) 0 0 1 M4 X _ --- - ----1.443 ...-•-__, _.._ 1.443 ...., ..-,....... 0 ...,......,. �..,... U ....... ,,, 2 M4 X 0 .45 .0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label o. 1 M3 X 3.6 -3.6 5 0 ' ,. Alt' :X.. 0 434.t... .•. :5:•. ..0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pp4) O. 0 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 2 11414 X 0 4$:948 o :0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...1...1...1...1Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-3ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer : Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 10:43 AM Checked By: Joint Loads and Enforced Displacements Joint Label L.D.M Direction M.ynitude[k.k-ft in.rad k's^2Jft] No Data to Print ... Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) (1 Member Label Dir i• n M1 X Ma • nitude k k -ft 8 Location ft 2.25 O Load Combinations 1 Normal+Surcharge+I... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 1 0 0 0 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 3 5 3 5 0 -8 0 0 0 10 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 10 7 4 0 -8.527 0 0 0 16.187 8 3 0 -9.221 0 0 0 22.832 9 4 5 -10.081 0 0 0 30.06 10 5 0 -11.108 0 0 0 37.996 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 0 0 37.996 12 2 0 -13.767 0 0 .0 68:946 13 3 0 -17.12 7 0 0 107.411 14 4 0 -9.917 0 0 0 142.001 15 5 0 1.092 0 8 0 153.826 9 10 11 12 13 .14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Member Section Forces L 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 3 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 10 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 10 7 2 0 -8.527 0 0 0 16.187 8 3 0 -9.221 0 0 0 22.832 9 4 0 -10.081 0 0 0 30.06 10 5 0 -11.108 0 0 0 37.996 11 1 M3 1 0 -11.108 0 0 0 37.996 12 2 0 -13.767 0 0 .0 68:946 13 3 0 -17.12 0 0 0 107.411 14 4 0 -9.917 0 0 0 142.001 15 5 0 1.092 0 0 0 153.826 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining Walls\CWall-cantilever-3ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 10:43 AM Checked By: Member Section Forces (Continued) 16 1 M4 1 0 1.092 0 0 0 153.826 17 Totals: 59.393 2 0 11.909 0 0 0 146.449 18 NC NC 3 0 25.231 0 0 0 124.92 19 4 0 41.06 0 0 0 86.302 20 5 0 59.393 0 0 0 27.656 Joint Reactions (By Combination) LC MX Ek-ftl 1 1 N5 59.393 0 0 0 0 27.656 2 1 Totals: 59.393 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 \Retaining WaIIs\CWall-cantilever-3ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 3 Hc= Summary 4 LC2 d(ft)= 14.48 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 0 Sreq'd (in3)= 0 LC3 18.47 195300 71 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 3 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 2368 11.3 26837 Pa2 H 1 4440 5.0 22200 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 2368 12.0 28416 Psurch2 Surch 1 1998 5.5 10989 Impact L 1 8000 16.3 130000 Pp1 H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 -2276 176942 Base Reactions Shear (V) -2276 Moment at A (M') 176942 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 1.25 25 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Total Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 15.39 164669 22596 2509 -139590 -50184 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 15.39 Embeded Length (ft)= 18.47 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Mmax (ft -Ib)= 195300 (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-4 Hc= 4 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 2368 11.3 26837 Pa2 H 1 4440 5.0 22200 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Esoil1 E 0.7 582 12.0 6 Esoil2 E 0.7 546 5.0 730 Ewalt E 0.7 904 15.8 14239 Ewa112 E 0.7 1033 1 : 12398 Ppl H 1 -18000 .5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 -1 : 6 43893 Base Reactions Shear (V) -1 Moment at A (M') 3893 Find Mmax and Death where otal=0 Depth below Tot. •epth Total burn fill = ow Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 12.07 19932 3329 142 -20565 -2838 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 12.07 Embeded Length (ft)= 14.48 Mmax (ft -I13)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:1SeattIe111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion ProjecttData and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-4 i:r1_. x 3 Results for LCX, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 1:16 PM CWall-cantileve +Surch+Imp.... Company Designer Job Number Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:16 PM Checked By: Label 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -4 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -14 0 0 5 N5 0 -19.39 0 0 !VI 471.p2 Joint Boundary Conditions Joint Label 1 N5 X [krnj Y [k/inj Z [kfin] X Rot.[k-ft/radj Y RoL[k-ft/radj Z Rot.[k-ft/rad] Footin Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction g 2 N1 Basic Load Cases BLC Desai 1 Pal +Pa2+Pa3 None 0 1.184 0 %100 2 3 X .444 2 Surch: Psprcfii+PsurCh2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 !VI 471.p2 None - 2 7 Pp3+Pp4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) ember label Direction Start Maanitude[kfft-deal End Magnitud . Start Lnc tionfft 1 M2 X 0 1.184 0 %100 2 M3 X .444 .444 '0. 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) ember Label Direction Sta ° 1 M2 X .592 .592 0 0 2 M. - X .592 .592:, • 0- • •9 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) ember Label Dir 1 M4 X 1.554 1.554 0 0 2 M4 X. 0 .518 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label Direction 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 -'ilt3, • X 0 .16.' " - ` •.. :"5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pp4) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.degl End Magnitud... Start Locationfft.%j M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 End Location[ft.%j 0 2 M4 • X 0 -10:S-64 • 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining Walls\CWaII-cantilever-4ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:16 PM Checked By: Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) Member Label 1 M1 Direction Maonitudefk.k-ft] X 8 Locationfft,%1 1.25 Load Combinations Descri 1 Normal+Surcharge+I... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 1 .0 0 0 3 2 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 3 5 0 -8 0 0 0 ' 18 6 1 M2 1 .0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 4 0 -8.74 0 0 0 26.345 8 3 0 -9.776 0 0 0 35579 9 4 5 -11.108 0 0 0 45.996 10 5 0 -12.736 -0.. 0 0 571893, 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 0 0 57.893 12 2 0 -15.673 0 0 0. 93.26. 13 3 0 -19.304 7 0 0 136.836 14 .4 0 -12.378 0 0. :0 1.77131 15 5 0 -1.054 0 8 0 195.257 16 1 M4 1 0 -1.054 0 0 .0 195.257. 17 2 0 11.445 0 0 9 188.629 18 3 0 27.257 0 0 0 162.925 19 4 0 46.383 0 0 0 10 20 5 0 68.822 0. 0 0 36.436 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Member Section Forces L 7 Shear(k1 Torque[k-ftl v -y Moment(k-ftl 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 .0 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 ' 18 6 1 M2 1 .0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -8.74 0 0 0 26.345 8 3 0 -9.776 0 0 0 35579 9 4 0 -11.108 0 0 0 45.996 10 5 0 -12.736 -0.. 0 0 571893, 11 1 M3 1 0 -12.736 0 0 0 57.893 12 2 0 -15.673 0 0 0. 93.26. 13 3 0 -19.304 0 0 0 136.836 14 .4 0 -12.378 0 0. :0 1.77131 15 5 0 -1.054 0 0 0 195.257 16 1 M4 1 0 -1.054 0 0 .0 195.257. 17 2 0 11.445 0 0 0 188.629 18 3 0 27.257 0 0 0 162.925 19 4 0 46.383 0 0 0 113.683 20 5 0 68.822 0. 0 0 36.436 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-4ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:16 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (By Combination) LC Joint Label Z fkl 1 1 N5 68.822 0 0 0 0 36.436 2 1 Totals: 68.822 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 (R:1...1...1...1...1Retaining WaIIs1CWaII-cantilever-4ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 3 Hc= Summary 6 LC2 LC3 d(ft)= 17.06 20.24 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 0 266848 Sreq'd (in3)= 0 97 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 3 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 5328 12.0 63936 Pa2 H 1 6660 5.0 33300 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 3552 13.0 46176 Psurch2 Surch 1 1554 6.5 10101 Impact L 1 8000 18.3 146000 Pp1 H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 3644 258013 Base Reactions Shear(V) 3644 Moment at A (M') 258013 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Total Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 16.87 283041 41890 5184 -226434 -103681 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 16.87 Embeded Length (ft)= 2024 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 266848 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIIs\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xis (Cantilever -6) Hc= 6 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment RISA Input Pal H 1 5328 12.0 63936 1776 Pa2 H 1 6660 5.0 33300 666 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 1110 Esoil1 E 0.7 1310 13.0 17035 218.4 Esoil2 E 0.7 819 5.0 4095 81.9 Ewalt E 0.7 904 17.8 16047 258 Ewall2 E 0.7 1550 13.0 20147 258 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 -3600 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 -3600 -4879 113060 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 -4879 113060 Depth below bum fill Total Depth Total Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 14.22 92476 15808 1202 -85450 -24036 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 14.22 Embeded Length (ft)= 17.06 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytica11Ca1culations\Retaining WalislAddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xts (Cantilever -6) 1266.8 Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) 10 2 9.3 3 Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 1:17 PM CW all-cantilever-6ft-N+Surch+Imp.... Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:17 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures • 1 N1 0 3.5 0 .+.,,V N 1 0 I_J LOI_ I1 I I VI11 UIUIJ... 2 N2 0 0 0 0 Ngne. 3 N3 0 -6 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -16 0 0 5 N5 0 -22.87 0 0 Apt'+fp2 Joint Boundary Conditions 7 f�nl • 1 N5 - -- ----- Reaction ----.... Reaction • Reaction ...., ..I...VI.+.••1 Reaction , ,.va.1,.-,111 VIM Reaction 4INW. .tn-I PIQUJ Reaction 1- wilily 2 NI 2 Surch: Ps urrMA+Psurch2- Ngne. 3 M3 X 0 Basic Load Cases 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None -.-.._ . _._..., _. ..., , .,.. , ...,,, a.l�a,,.,..a�.. 3 �w AL1... ♦JIl11Qa.c % 2 Surch: Ps urrMA+Psurch2- Ngne. 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Apt'+fp2 Nene ` 2 7 Pp3+Pp4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) ember L •ntH 0. 0 1 M2 - ---_-. X ----_ .___�..._-•__.._._.-->. 0 ...- ......y.....-..... 1.776 vw...w.l.nwv..l.a / 0 !1 !.a/a.ou ngIn. IPJ %100 2- 'M3 X .666 - .666 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) MemberLabel Direction Start Magnitudefk/ft degl End Magnitud Start Locationfft 0 •nrH 0 1 M2 X .592 .592 . /VI 0 0 2 -. 8. X-� - . :i92 ..:592 0.. 7 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) •i..-.rH 0, •ftAl 0 1 M4 X . - .-._.--�. 1.776 _....... 7.... ,.. 1.776 . .w..a ..., .,, .�.a, /PJ 0 SII.. �a. ..Qa1on[ , 0 2 IVt4 X 0 .659 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member La 0 0 1 M3 X __ X -__.-_-__-_•-.-_---.._•-•---.. -3.6 vs..,• •-••••••••-••••••• .11, 141 0 �..-...� ..........• -3.6 .. w.. �vwuv..l..,♦v1 5 �...��vwa,v„l,a. IVI 0 2. -N13; .. , : R :;X` - , .. : 0 : : , .`, . ,'3'6 - .. .. .. ,;5:: .0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pp4) m 0 •....FH 0 1 M4 X .._._.__-.. -9.6 .......-r..-...,........, -9.6 vs..,• •-••••••••-••••••• .11, 141 0 �na..wwuvnHa./VI 0 2 M4 X 0 .._13.1:87 =:U' -0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...1...1...1...1Retaining WaIIs1CWaIi-cantilever-6ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:17 PM Checked By: Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) Member Label 1 M1 Direction Magnitudejk.k-ft] X 8 Location[ft.%1 2.25 Load Combinations 1 Normal+Surcharge+I... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 1 2• .0 0 . 2 Normal+Seismic 0 . ..U- :. 1 1 3 .7 4 .7 5 1 6 1 7 1 0 0 0 3 4 0 -8 0 - 0 0- 3 5 5 0 -8 4 0 0 10 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 .0 0.' 10 - 5 2 0 -9.221 00 0 22.832 8 3- . -.0 -1.1.108. 6 : 0 -.0. . 37.996 9 4 0 -13.661 0 0 0 56.489 7 5. 0 -16:38:,• .. :0' : 0 -'0.. 79:312 11 1 M3 1 0 -16.88 8 0 0 79.312 12 2. . . 0 -21 :372 , 0 0 0125:732 9 3 0 -24.557 0 0 0 181.749 14 4,.. • .0 -17:89:1-. 1'0 0 :: 235+899 15 5 0 -6.234 0 0 0 266.848 11 1 M4 1.: - .... 0 -6234 0 ... .0 0' 2661848 17 2 0 9.893 12 0 0 264.475 18 . 3 13 ... .. 31:4 0 0 0 229.785 13 4 0 58.286 0 0 0 153.537 20:.... 5 . ..0 . : • 90:551_ : '- 14 .:... .0 .",10' 26:4.94. . 15 16. 17 1'8 19 20- 21 22 23 24 25 26• 27 Member Section Forces L 7 Shearfkl Tornuefk-ftl v -v Momentjk-ftt 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2• .0 0 . . <0 . .. 0 . ..U- :. .:. 0. 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 -8 0 - 0 0- 3 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 10 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 .0 0.' 10 - 7 2 0 -9.221 00 0 22.832 8 3- . -.0 -1.1.108. O. : 0 -.0. . 37.996 9 4 0 -13.661 0 0 0 56.489 10 5. 0 -16:38:,• .. :0' : 0 -'0.. 79:312 11 1 M3 1 0 -16.88 0 0 0 79.312 12 2. . . 0 -21 :372 , 0 0 0125:732 13 3 0 -24.557 0 0 0 181.749 14 4,.. • .0 -17:89:1-. 0 0 :: 235+899 15 5 0 -6.234 0 0 0 266.848 16 1 M4 1.: - .... 0 -6234 0 ... .0 0' 2661848 17 2 0 9.893 0 0 0 264.475 18 . 3 13 ... .. 31:4 0 0 0 229.785 19 4 0 58.286 0 0 0 153.537 20:.... 5 . ..0 . : • 90:551_ : '- , : 0' .:... .0 .",10' 26:4.94. . RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining Walis\CWaII-cantilever-6ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:17 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (By Combination) 7 Ikl 1 1 N5 90.551 0 0 0 0 26.494 2 1 Totals: 90,551 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...1...1...1...\Retaining Walls\CWall-cantilever-Eft-N+Surch+Imp.r3dJ Page 3 Hc= Summary 8 LC2 LC3 d(ft)= 19.58 22.09 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 0 380200 Sreq'd (in3)= 0 138 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 3 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 9472 12.7 119979 Pa2 H 1 8880 5.0 44400 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 4736 14.0 66304 Psurch2 Surch 1 1110 7.5 8325 Impact L 1 8000 20.3 162000 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 10748 359508 Base Reactions Shear(V) 10748 Moment at A (M') 359508 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Total Depth Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Total Moment 18.41 449920 70691 9524 -339656 -190479 0 Depth below burn fill 26.41 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.41 Embeded Length (ft)= 22.:09 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Mmax (ft -Ib)= 380200 (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallslAddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-8 Hc= 8 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 9472 12.7 119979 Pa2 H 1 8880 5.0 44400 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Esoill E 0.7 2330 14.0 32614 Esoil2 E 0.7 1092 5.0 5460 EwaII E 0.7 904 19.8 17855 Ewa112 E 0.7 2066 14.0 28930 Ppl 11 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 3294 207738 Base Reactions Shear (V) 3294 Moment at A (M') 207738 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below bum fill Total Depth Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Total Moment 16.32 228556 39902 4039 -191719 -80777 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 16.32 Embeded Length (ft)= 19.58 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C1WalIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-8 Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 1:19 PM C W aIl-cantilever-8ft-N+Surch+Imp.... Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:19 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label Y 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -18 0 0 5 N5 - 0 -26.41 0 0 E: evvali,`+Ewe1[2 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in N5 Reaction Y [Win] Z [k/iin] X Rot[k-ft/rad] Y Rot [k-fl/rad] Z Rot.[k-ft/radj Footing Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction 2 N1 Basic Load Cases BLC Descriot Catry X Gravity YGravity Z Grav 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 2.368 0 %100 2 3 X .888 2 Surch: Psurtrti1+Ps1.irch2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 2 4 E: evvali,`+Ewe1[2 None 2 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Pri:1=+0 None. 2 7 Pp3+Pp4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None _ 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember Label Direction Start MaanitudefWft.d 1 M2 X 0 2.368 0 %100 2 M3 X .888 .888 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[Wft.deo] End Magnitud... Start Locationfft %] M2 X .592 .592 0 End Location[ft.%1 0 2 M3 .X .592 .592 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoill + Esoil2) ember Label Direction Start MaanitudeEWft.deol End Maan L 1 M2 X .624 .624 0 0 2 M3 • X .243 .243 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+Ewall2) MemberLabel Direction Start Mapnitude[Wft.degl End Maanitud... Start Locationrft d Locationrft 1 M1 X .369 .369 0 0 2 - M2:.: "-Y. .369 .369 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) ember Label Direction Start Maonitudefk/ft.d nd Maonitud... Start Locat d Locationrft.% 1 M4 X 1.998 1.998 0 0 .2 ` M4 X 0 .808 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Pp1+Pp2) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft,deg] End Magnitud... Start Location[ft,%] End Location[ft,%] RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-8ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:19 PM Checked By: Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Pp1+Pp2) (Continued) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.deo] End Magnitud... Start Location[ft•%J M3 X - 3.6 -3.6 5 End Location[ft.%] 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pn4 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.deo] End Magnitud... Start Location[ft.%] M4 X - 9.6 -9.6 0 End Location[ft•%] 0 2 M4 X 0 -16.151 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) M ember Label Direction 1 M1 X Magnitude[k k -ft] 8 Location[ft•%] 1.25 Load Combinations D 1 Normal+Surcharge+I... Yes 1 1 1 2 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 9 1 " '0 :0 0 0 2 33 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4. 4` : :.,. :0 -8 0.. 0 3 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6:.:. 1 ...M2 .1 .0.. -8 0 4 0 18 7 2 0 -9.776 0 0 0 35.579 8.. . 3 0 ..' . _12:I36". 5 0 0 57.893 9 4 0 -16.88 0 0 0 87.312 10 5 ~'0 ; .: 6 ..0-:. _ . '0 .. 0 126.203 7 .8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 . 15 16 . 17 18. 19 20 • 21 22, 23 24 25 26 Member Section Forces LC Member Label 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 :2: 0 ., . " '0 :0 0 0 0 33 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4. 4` : :.,. :0 -8 0.. 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6:.:. 1 ...M2 .1 .0.. -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -9.776 0 0 0 35.579 8.. . 3 0 ..' . _12:I36". .;0 0 0 57.893 9 4 0 -16.88 0 0 0 87.312 10 5 ~'0 ; .: -22".208:: ' ..0-:. _ . '0 .. 0 126.203 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...1...1...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWall-cantilever-8ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever Member Section Forces (Continued) July 9, 2008 1:19 PM Checked By: C Member Label 11 1 M3 1 0 -22.208 0 0 0 126.203 12 Totals: 115:852 2 0 -26:255 0 0 0 186.637 13 NC NC 3 0 -30.996 0 0 0 258.055 14 4 0 23.7 0 0 0 327.217 15 5 0 -12.598 0 0 0 373.383 16 1 M4 1 0 -12.598 0 0 0 373.383 17 2 0 7.418 0 0 0 380.242 1'8 3 0 35.498 0 0 0 336.54 19 4 0 71.643 0 0 0 225.322 20 5 0 115:852 0 0 0 29.631 Joint Reactions (Bv Combination) MX fk-ftl 1 1 N5 115.852 0 0 0 0 29.631 2 1 Totals: 115:852 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-8ft-N+Surch+lmp.r3d] Page 3 Hc= Summary 110 LC2 LC3 LC1 d(ft)= 22.07 24.01 21.63 Mmax(ft-lb)= 0 515800 312836 Sreq'd (in3)= 0 188 114 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 3 LC1 for temporary construction condition for tie back wall Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 14800 13.3 197333 Pa2 H 1 11100 5.0 55500 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 5920 15.0 88800 Psurch2 Surch 1 666 8.5 5661 Impact L 1 8000 22.3 178000 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 19036 483794 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M) 483794 19036 Find Mmax and De • th where Mtotal=0 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Below Grade 20.01 Total M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 674305 111176 16038 -480759 -320759 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 20.01 Embeded Length (ft)= 24.01 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Mmax (ft -Ib)= 515800 (from RISA) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-10 Hc= 10 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Pal Pa2 Pa3 Esoil l Esoil2 Ewalt Ewa112 Pp1 Pp2 Base Reactions Load Category H H H E E E E H H Shear (V) Moment at A (M) Find Mmax and De Factor 1 1 1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1 1 th where Mtotal=0 12942 331166 Load Arm Moment 14800 13.3 197333 11100 5.0 55500 5550 3.3 18500 3640 15.0 54600 1365 5.0 6825 904 21.8 19663 2583 15.0 38745 -18000 2.5 -45000 -9000 1.7 -15000 12942 331166 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Below Grade M1 18.39 439803 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 78212 9463 -338212 -189266 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.39 Embeded Length (ft)= 22.07 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations1Retaining WaIlslAddressReviewComments\Wall C1WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-10 Total Moment 0 Hc= 10 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 1 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 14800 13.3 197333 Pa2 H 1 11100 5.0 55500 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 5920 15.0 88800 Psurch2 Surch 1 666 8.5 5661 Pp1 H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 11036 305794 Base Reactions Shear(V) 11036 Moment at A (M') 305794 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 1 11 316830 1110 16 -4800 -320 312836 2 12 327866 4440 128 -19200 -2560 310674 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 13 338902 9990 432 -43200 -8640 297484 14 349938 17760 1024 -76800 -20480 271442 15 360974 27750 2000 -120000 -40000 230724 16 372010 39960 3456 -172800 -69120 173506 17 383046 54390 5488 -235200 -109760 97964 18 394082 71040 8192 -307200 -163840 2274 19 405118 89910 11664 -388800 -233280 -115388 20 416154 111000 16000 -480000 -320000 -256846 21 427190 134310 21296 -580800 -425920 -423924 22 438226 159840 27648 -691200 -552960 -618446 23 449262 187590 35152 -811200 -703040 -842236 24 460298 217560 43904 -940800 -878080 -1097118 25 471334 249750 54000 -1080000 -1080000 -1384916 26 482370 284160 65536 -1228800 -1310720 -1707454 27 493406 320790 78608 -1387200 -1572160 -2066556 28 504442 359640 93312 -1555200 -1866240 -2464046 29 515478 400710 109744 -1732800 -2194880 -2901748 30 526514 444000 128000 -1920000 -2560000 -3381486 18.02 394318 71419 8258 -308841 -165154 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.02 Embeded Length (ft)= 21.63 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 312836 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 1 (d @ M=0 + 20%) 113.7587 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-10 Results for LC 1, Norrnal+Surcharge+tmpact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 1:20 PM C W aII-cantilever-loft-N+Surch+Im... Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:20 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures L Temp fFl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 w ..., ... . Y... 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -10 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -20 0 • 0 5 N5 0 -30.01 0 0 Ppl+Pp2 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/inj N5 Reaction Y [k/in] Reaction Z [Win 1 Reaction X Rot Lk-ft/rad) Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Rot.[k-ft/radj Footing Reaction Reaction Reaction 2 N1 Basic Load Cases BLC D 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None --------'.------ ---- ---.. 0 . ....-v......... . 2.96 ..w.. rvw..v..P. /VI 0 a...v •-• auv..P a. IVa %100 2 3 X 1.11 2 Surch: Psurctil+Psurch2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 Pp3+Pp4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) 0 0 1 M2 X --------'.------ ---- ---.. 0 . ....-v......... . 2.96 ..w.. rvw..v..P. /VI 0 a...v •-• auv..P a. IVa %100 2 M3 X 1.11 1.11 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) Member Label Direction Start MaonitudetWft deal End Magnitud Start Locationfft 0 0 1 M2 X .592 ... .592 ••• /.1 0 .-.w wwwVN .. L. (.1 0 2. M3 X .592 .592 0 3 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) M ..rH 0 •.nrf 0 1 M4 X 2.22 2.22 0 0 2. M4 X 0 :961 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member La 0 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2:- ..-M3. ,X. , 0. -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pp4) M 0 0 1 M4 X -_ _ ...-. ..--_.—.._...—..�. -9.6 _......w7........... -9.6 .. w.. �............a... /.y 0 �..a. �a.a.c.uv..ra a. /PJ 0 2:- M4. X 0 -19.215 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-l0ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) July 9, 2008 1:20 PM Checked By: Member Label Direction 1 M1 X Magnitude[k.k-ft) 8 location[ft.% ) 1.25 Load Combinations Des 1 Normal+Surcharge+I- . Yes 1 0 1_ 1_2_. 0 1_. _51 -2•. 6_. 1... _7 .. 1 ...9 .. ... ........�.,, 0 0 .. 2 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 3 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 • .6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 4 0 -10.405 0 0 0 40.621 .8. 3 0 -14.66 - 0 .0 0 71•:567 9 4 5 -20.765 0 0 0 115.462 IiI, 5 0 :-28.72 0 0 0 176933 11 1 M3 1 0 -6 0 0 0 176.933 ::;12-;, 2 0 _33:322: . 0 0 264341 13 3 0 -37.433 7 0 0 342.937 X143: 4 0 .-30F693. • 0 0 0 4201488 15 5 0 -20.146 0 8 0 493.229 41`6. 1 M4 1 0 -20:1`46' . 0 0 0 40.,229 17 2 0 4.033 0 0 9 515.773 $ -. 3 0 39.631. .0 0 0 46152 19 4 0 86.65 0 0 0 1",0 •20 5 0 .145;089 0 0 0 20:31 11 • 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20. . 21 2,2 23 25 Member Section Forces 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -2•. 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 • .6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -10.405 0 0 0 40.621 .8. 3 0 -14.66 - 0 .0 0 71•:567 9 4 0 -20.765 0 0 0 115.462 IiI, 5 0 :-28.72 0 0 0 176933 11 1 M3 1 0 -28.72 0 0 0 176.933 ::;12-;, 2 0 _33:322: 0 0 0 264341 13 3 0 -37.433 0 0 0 342.937 X143: 4 0 .-30F693. • 0 0 0 4201488 15 5 0 -20.146 0 0 0 493.229 41`6. 1 M4 1 0 -20:1`46' . 0 0 0 40.,229 17 2 0 4.033 0 0 0 515.773 $ -. 3 0 39.631. .0 0 0 46152 19 4 0 86.65 0 0 0 307.892 •20 5 0 .145;089 0 0 0 20:31 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...1...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-l0ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company : Designer Job Number : Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:20 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (Bv Combination) LC Joint Label Y fk Z (k MX Ek - 1 1 N5 145.089 0 0 0 0 20.31 2 1 Totals: 145.089 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-l0ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 3 Hc= Summary 11 LC2 d(ft)= .3' Mmax(ft-Ib)= Sreq'd (in3)= 0 LC1 �I LC 1 for temporary 22.74 construction condition for 383503 tie back wall 139 Hc= 11 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 1 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 17908 13.7 244743 Pa2 H 1 12210 5.0 61050 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 6512 15.5 100936 Psurch2 Surch 1 444 9.0 3996 Ewalt E 0 0 22.8 0 Ewa112 E 0 0 15.5 0 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 15624 369225 Base Reactions Shear (V) 15624 Moment at A (M') 369225 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 1 11 384849 1166 16 -4800 -320 380910 2 12 400473 4662 128 -19200 -2560 383503 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 13 416097 10490 432 -43200 -8640 375178 14 431721 18648 1024 -76800 -20480 354113 15 447345 29138 2000 -120000 -40000 318482 16 462969 41958 3456 -172800 -69120 266463 17 478593 57110 5488 -235200 -109760 196230 18 494217 74592 8192 -307200 -163840 105961 19 509841 94406 11664 -388800 -233280 -6170 20 525465 116550 16000 -480000 -320000 -141985 21 541089 141026 21296 -580800 -425920 -303310 22 556713 167832 27648 -691200 -552960 -491967 23 572337 196970 35152 -811200 -703040 -709782 24 587961 228438 43904 -940800 -878080 -958577 25 603585 262238 54000 -1080000 -1080000 -1240178 26 619209 298368 65536 -1228800 -1310720 -1556407 27 634833 336830 78608 -1387200 -1572160 -1909090 28 650457 377622 93312 -1555200 -1866240 -2300049 29 666081 420746 109744 -1732800 -2194880 -2731110 30 681705 466200 128000 -1920000 -2560000 -3204095 18.95 509057 93357 11470 -384481 -229404 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.95 Embeded Length (ft)= 22.74 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 383503 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 2 (d @ M=0 + 20%) 139.4555 R:\Seattle1.11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnaiyticallCalculations\Retaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall C1Wal1C-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.)dsCantilever-11 Hc= Summary 12 C2 LC3 LC1 d(ft)= 2 25.97 22.10 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 683000 463509 Sreq'd (in3)= 248 169 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load 3 LC1 for temporary construction condition for tie back wall Load Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 21312 14.0 298368 Pa2 H 1 13320 5.0 66600 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 7104 16.0 113664 Psurch2 Surch 1 222 9.5 2109 Impact L 1 8000 24.3 194000 Pp1 H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 28508 633241 Base Reactions Shear (V) 28508 Moment at A (M') 633241 Find Mmax and Death where Mtotal=0 Depth below burn fill 33.64 Total Depth Total Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 21.64 965189 165547 25260 -650800 -505196 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 21.64 Embeded Length (ft)= 25.97 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 683000 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaUIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-12 Hc= 12 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 2 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 21312 14.0 298368 Pa2 H 1 13320 5.0 66600 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Esoill E 0.7 5242 16.0 83866 Esoil2 E 0.7 1638 5.0 8190 Ewall E 0.7 904 23.8 21471 Ewall2 E 0.7 3100 16.0 49594 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 24065 486588 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M') 486588 24065 Find Mmax and De . th where Mtotal=0 Depth below burn fill Total Depth Below Grade 20.45 Total M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 738121 133391 18270 -524386 -365396 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 20.45 Embeded Length (ft)= 24.54 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) (from RISA) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallslAddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-12 Hc= 12 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 1 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pa1 H 1 21312 14.0 298368 Pa2 H 1 13320 5.0 66600 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 7104 16.0 113664 Psurch2 Surch 1 222 9.5 2109 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 20508 439241 Base Reactions Shear(V) 20508 Moment at A (M') 439241 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 1 11 459749 1221 16 -4800 -320 455866 2 12 480257 4884 128 -19200 -2560 463509 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 500765 10989 432 -43200 -8640 460346 14 521273 19536 1024 -76800 -20480 444553 15 541781 30525 2000 -120000 -40000 414306 16 562289 43956 3456 -172800 -69120 367781 17 582797 59829 5488 -235200 -109760 303154 18 603305 78144 8192 -307200 -163840 218601 19 623813 98901 11664 -388800 -233280 112298 20 644321 122100 16000 -480000 -320000 -17579 21 664829 147741 21296 -580800 -425920 -172854 22 685337 175824 27648 -691200 -552960 -355351 23 705845 206349 35152 -811200 -703040 -566894 24 726353 239316 43904 -940800 -878080 -809307 25 746861 274725 54000 -1080000 -1080000 -1084414 18.41 611781 86426 9528 -339760 -190567 177409 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 18.41 Embeded Length (ft)= 22.10 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 463509 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 2 (d @ M=0 + 20%) 168.5487 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-12 Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 at 1:25 PM CW aII-cantilever-12ft-N+Surch+Im... Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:26 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Z Eftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 1 3 N3 0 -12 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -22 0 0 1 5 N5 0 -33.64 0 0 PpT+Pp2 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/inj N5 Reaction Y [kin] Reaction Z [kin Reaction X Rot.[k-ft/radj Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Ralik-ft/rad] Footin Reaction Reaction Reaction g 2 N1 Basic Load Cases LC Description Point 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 3.552 0 %100 2 3 X 1.332 2 Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 5 Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 PpT+Pp2 NOne 2 7 Pp3+Pp4 None 2 9 Surch: Impact None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) Member Label Directio 0 1 M2 X 0 3.552 0 %100 2 M3: X 1.332 1.332 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl+Psurch2) Member Label Direction Start Mudefk/ft.deal End Maanitud... Start Locationfft.° 0 1 M2 X .592 .592 0 0 2 :M3 X .592 .592-. 0 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : Pa4+Pa5) mber Label Directi Start Locatiionfft.%1 1 M4 X 2.442 2.442 0 0 2 'M4 X 0 1.118. 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label Dire 0 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3•. :X 0 -36`. .5:. _ 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : Pp3+Pp4) ember Label Directi 0 0 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 2. M4 X ' 0 -22:356 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\Retaining Walls\CWall-cantilever-12ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:26 PM Checked By: Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: Impact) Member Label 1 M1 Direction Magnitude[k.k-ftj X 8 Location[ft.%j 1.25 Load Combinations Des 1 Normal+Surcharge+I... Yes - - 0 1 1 2 1 5 ........ 1 .--.... 6 f rva.. 1 v4vJ 7 1 9 1 0 0 .: 0 2 0 .. 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 3 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 . 5 5 0 -8 0 4 0 0 18 6 1 M2 .1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 5 2 0 -11.108 0 0 0 45.996 8 3 . 0 -1.6:8$ 0 6 0 '0 87:312 . 9 4 0 -25.316 0 0 0 149.94 ' t'0. 7 :5 - U .. 3f144t16.:. 0'" :. 0 : 0` :240.1872 11 1 M3 1 0 -36.416 0 8 0 0 241.872 :12 .2 ' . 0 •,.-40161% ' ,.-4 ;6$%' : :-0..:. ' 0 ' '0 338;°548 . 13 9 3 0 -45.055 0 0 0 445.578 . i'4 4 0 " .. :4841Y. 0 10 0.. 0 551°:278 15 5 0 -28.878 0 " 0 0 636.756 1:6 11 M4 1 0 -28:$78:: :.. 0 0 0. 636:756 17 2 0 -.323 0 12 0 0 682.99 1°8 3 0 430-8 0 '0 0 .023648 19 13 4 0 103.139 0 0 0 413.769 20 .5 0 1. 78:046 0 1.4 '0 0 8:391 15 16 17 8. 19 20 • 21 22 23 24 25 26" . Member Section Forces Axiallkl 1 1 M1 - - - 0 0 _..a_.....,o .., .... ,a_..�., ..` ......o .,,.. ,.. 2 2 0 0 .: 0 0 .. 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 . 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 .1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -11.108 0 0 0 45.996 8 3 . 0 -1.6:8$ 0 0 '0 87:312 . 9 4 0 -25.316 0 0 0 149.94 ' t'0. :5 - U .. 3f144t16.:. 0'" :. 0 : 0` :240.1872 11 1 M3 1 0 -36.416 0 0 0 241.872 :12 .2 ' . 0 •,.-40161% ' ,.-4 ;6$%' : :-0..:. ' 0 ' '0 338;°548 . 13 3 0 -45.055 0 0 0 445.578 . i'4 4 0 " .. :4841Y. 0 0.. 0 551°:278 15 5 0 -28.878 0 0 0 636.756 1:6 1 M4 1 0 -28:$78:: :.. 0 0 0. 636:756 17 2 0 -.323 0 0 0 682.99 1°8 3 0 430-8 0 '0 0 .023648 19 4 0 103.139 0 0 0 413.769 20 .5 0 1. 78:046 0 '0 0 8:391 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...1...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWaII-cantilever-l2ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number Wall C Cantilever July 9, 2008 1:26 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (By Combination) Z fkl MX fk-ft MY (k -ft MZ fk- 1 1 N5 178.046 0 0 0 0 8.391 2 1 Totals: 178.046 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...1...\...\...\Retaining WaIIs\CWall-cantilever-12ft-N+Surch+Imp.r3d] Page 3 Hc= Summary d(ft)= Mmax(ft-Ib)= Sreq'd (in3)= 113 LC2 - LC1 - 2 26.97 24.96 0 553284 201 Hc= 13 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case LC 1 for temporary construction condition for tie back wall 1 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pa 1 H 1 25012 14.3 358505 Pa2 H 1 14430 5.0 72150 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 7696 16.5 126984 Psurch2 Surch 1 0 10.0 0 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 25688 516139 Base Reactions Shear (V) 25688 Moment at A (M') 516139 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 1 11 541827 1277 16 -4800 -320 538000 2 12 567515 5106 128 -19200 -2560 550989 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 20 13 593203 11489 432 -43200 -8640 553284 14 618891 20424 1024 -76800 -20480 543059 15 644579 31913 2000 -120000 -40000 518492 16 670267 45954 3456 -172800 -69120 477757 17 695955 62549 5488 -235200 -109760 419032 18 721643 81696 8192 -307200 -163840 340491 19 747331 103397 11664 -388800 -233280 240312 20 773019 127650 16000 -480000 -320000 116669 21 798707 154457 21296 -580800 -425920 -32260 22 824395 183816 27648 -691200 -552960 -208301 23 850083 215729 35152 -811200 -703040 -413276 24 875771 250194 43904 -940800 -878080 -649011 25 901459 287213 54000 -1080000 -1080000 -917328 30 1029899 510600 128000 -1920000 -2560000 -2811501 20.80 793510 148827 20142 -559631 -402848 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 20.80 Embeded Length (ft)= 24:96 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 553284 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 3 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:ISeattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnalyticatlCalculations\Retaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall C1WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01AsCantilever-13 Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) N1 N2 4.8 0 N4 h=13 ft July 9, 2008 at 1:59 PM CW aII-13-Normal+Surcharge.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:10 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label Y tftl Temp IFl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 1 3 N3 0 -13 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -22.31 0 0 Joint Boundary Conditions Joint Label 1 N4 X Win] Reaction Y [k/in] Z [kfin] X Rot.[k-ft/radL Y Rot,[k-ft/radJ Z Rot,[k-ft/rad] Reaction I Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Footing Basic Load Cases Point 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 3.848 0 %100 2 3 X 1.443 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.034 1 0 2 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 3 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None 4 Yes Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) Start Location[ft 0/ 1 0 1 M2 X. 0 3.848 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.443 1.443 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.034 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 M2 Direction Start Magnitude[k/fkd.. End Magnitude[k/ft,d... Start Location[ft 0 ] End Location[ft.%1 X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Ppl+Pp2) 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.106 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k k-ftj -28.731 Location[ft.%] 5 Load Combinations Descriation Solve PD 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 - 3- 1 - --- -- - -- - -- - 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes 5 Yes 6 Yes 7 Yes 8 Yes 9 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...I...1...1...1...1...1Wa11 C\RISA\CWaII-13-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer - Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:10 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) Descriation SoIvePD... SR... BLC Factor 10 1 Yes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: -.015 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 NC Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 5 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 Yes 0 0 0 4.82 8 3 0 18.63 0 0 0 -17.042 9 4 14 8.89 Yes 0 0 -62.609 10 5 0 -3.977 0 0 0 -71.439 11 1 M3 1 0 15 0 Yes 0 -71.439 12 2 0 -7.636 0 0 0 -58.04 13 3 0 -11.897 16 0 Yes -35.424 14 4 0 -8.207 0 0 0 -10.201 15 5 0 -.015 0 17 0 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces Member Label v Shearfkl 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: -.015 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 NC NC 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 -3.487 0 0 0 4.82 8 3 0 18.63 0 0 0 -17.042 9 4 0 8.89 0 0 0 -62.609 10 5 0 -3.977 0 0 0 -71.439 11 1 M3 1 0 -3.977 0 0 0 -71.439 12 2 0 -7.636 0 0 0 -58.04 13 3 0 -11.897 0 0 0 -35.424 14 4 0 -8.207 0 0 0 -10.201 15 5 0 -.015 0 0 0 .008 Joint Reactions LC Joint Label Z fkl 1 1 N4 -.015 0 0 0 0 .008 2 1 Totals: -.015 0 0 3 1 COG CM: NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C1RISA\CWaII-13-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 2 Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact 1 Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 13 feet Normal+Surcharge+Impact Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:18 PM CW alI-13-Normal+Surcharge+Imp... Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:13 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 • 0 0 0 1 3 N3 0 -13 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -21.45 0 0 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in] N4 Reaction Y [k/inj Reaction Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot.[k-ft/radj Z Rot [k-ft/rad] Footing Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases BLC Descriptio X Gravity Y Gravity Z Gravity 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 3.848 0 %100 2 3 X 1.443 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 .938 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 8 Surch: Impact None 1 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember Label 0 1 M2 X 0 3.848 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.443 1.443 0 0 3 M3 X 0 .938 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) 1 Member Label M2 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft,d..End Magnitude[k/ft,d... Start Location[ft.%] End Location[ft,%J X .592 1 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Pp1+Pp2) 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -2.483 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : Surch: Impact) Member Label Direction 1 M1 X Magnitude[k.k-ft] 8 Location[ft,%] 1.25 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ftl -40.165 Location[ft,%J 5 Load Combinations Description SoIvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 8 1 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...1...1...\...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaIl-13-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 3 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:13 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) Description 5 1 Yes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - --- - __ _ __ .............�......,._ 0 0 0 _..... —.-. 6 NC Yes 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 7 5 Yes -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 8 0 Yes 0 0 0 48.82 8 3 0 22.064 0 0 0 35.807 9 4 9 12.324 Yes 0 0 -20.92 10 5 0 -.543 0 0 0 -40.911 11 1 M3 1 0 10 0 Yes 0 -40.911 12 2 0 -3.839 0 0 0 -36.369 13 3 0 -7.63 11 0 Yes -24.342 14 4 0 -6.458 0 0 0 -7.289 15 5 0 .004 0 12 0 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces c 7 Shearlkl --- .c- - 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: .004 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 NC NC 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -11.487 0 0 0 48.82 8 3 0 22.064 0 0 0 35.807 9 4 0 12.324 0 0 0 -20.92 10 5 0 -.543 0 0 0 -40.911 11 1 M3 1 0 -.543 0 0 0 -40.911 12 2 0 -3.839 0 0 0 -36.369 13 3 0 -7.63 0 0 0 -24.342 14 4 0 -6.458 0 0 0 -7.289 15 5 0 .004 0 0 0 .007 Joint Reactions LC Y fkl 1 1 N4 .004 0 0 0 0 .007 2 1 Totals: .004 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wall CIRISA\CWall-13-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 4 1.6 2 10.1 Results for LC 1, Normal+Seismic Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) 13 Feet Normal and Seismic Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:16 PM C W a II -13 -Seismic. r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:14 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -13 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -22.39 0 0 1 Joint Boundary Conditions J oint Label 1 N4 X [Winj Reaction Y [k/ii ] Reaction Z [Win] X Rot.[k-ft/radL Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Rol[k-Wradj Reaction J Reaction Reaction I Reaction Footing Basic Load Cases BLC D X Gravity Y Gravity z Gravity 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 3.848 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.443 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.043 2 0 4 E: Ewall+EwaII2 None 2 5 E: Pa4+Pa5 None 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 E: Pp3+Pp4 None 8 E: TieBack None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) 0 0 1 M2 X 0 3.848 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.443 1.443 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.043 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoill + Esoil2) Member Label Dir ti 0 1 M2 X .676 .676 0 0 2 M3 X .254 .254 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+EwaII2) ember La 0 1 M1 X .258 .258 0 0 2 M2 X .258 .258 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label Direction Start MaonitudefWft,d..End MaonitudefWft d... Start Locationfft 0 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.164 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : E: TieBack) M ember Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k k -ft] -31.994 Location[ft.%] 5 Load Combinations Description SovePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Seis.. Yes 1 1 3 .7 4 1 6 1 8 1 2 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...\...1...1Wall C\RISA\CWaII-13-Seismic.r3d1 Page 5 Company Designer Job Number Load Combinations (Continued) July 9, 2008 2:14 PM Checked By: Description SolvePD... SR 3 1 Yes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: -.013 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 4 NC Yes 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 . 5 5 Yes -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 6 0 Yes 0 0 0 10.07 8 3 0 20.085 0 0 0 -11.546 9 4 7 9.893 Yes 0 0 -61.107 10 5 0 -3.427 0 0 0 -72.461 11 1 M3 1 0 8 0 Yes 0 -72.461 12 2 0 -7.537 0 0 0 -59.712 13 3 0 -12.26 9 0 Yes -36.594 14 4 0 -8.376 0 0 0 -10.573 15 5 0 -.013 0 10 0 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC Member Label v Shear(kj 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: -.013 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 NC NC 3 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 . 5 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 2 0 -4.843 0 0 0 10.07 8 3 0 20.085 0 0 0 -11.546 9 4 0 9.893 0 0 0 -61.107 10 5 0 -3.427 0 0 0 -72.461 11 1 M3 1 0 -3.427 0 0 0 -72.461 12 2 0 -7.537 0 0 0 -59.712 13 3 0 -12.26 0 0 0 -36.594 14 4 0 -8.376 0 0 0 -10.573 15 5 0 -.013 0 0 0 -.069 Joint Reactions LC J Z tkt 1 1 N4 -.013 0 0 0 0 -.069 2 1 Totals: -.013 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-13-Seismic.r3d] Page 6 Hc= Summary d(ft)= Mmax(ft-Ib)= Sreq'd (1n3)= 14 LC1 26.06 654288 238 Hc= 14 Calculate Reactions at Bottom of Burn Fill Load Case 1 Load Category Factor Load Arm Moment Pal H 1 29008 14.7 425451 Pa2 H 1 15540 5.0 77700 Pa3 H 1 5550 3.3 18500 Psurch Surch 1 8288 17.0 140896 Psurch2 Surch 1 -222 10.5 -2331 Ppl H 1 -18000 2.5 -45000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 1.7 -15000 31164 600216 Base Reactions Shear(V) 31164 Moment at A (M') 600216 Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Depth below Total Depth Total burn fill Below Grade M1 MPa4 MPa5 MPp3 MPp4 Moment 1 11 631380 1332 16 -4800 -320 627608 2 12 662544 5328 128 -19200 -2560 646240 3 13 693708 11988 432 -43200 -8640 654288 4 14 724872 21312 1024 -76800 -20480 649928 5 15 756036 33300 .2000 -120000 -40000 631336 6 16 787200 47952 3456 -172800 -69120 596688 7 17 818364 65268 5488 -235200 -109760 544160 8 18 849528 85248 8192 -307200 -163840 471928 9 19 880692 107892 11664 -388800 -233280 378168 10 20 911856 133200 16000 -480000 -320000 261056 11 21 943020 161172 21296 -580800 -425920 118768 12 22 974184 191808 27648 -691200 -552960 -50520 13 23 1005348 225108 35152 -811200 -703040 -248632 14 24 1036512 261072 43904 -940800 -878080 -477392 15 25 1067676 299700 54000 -1080000 -1080000 -738624 16 26 1098840 340992 65536 -1228800 -1310720 -1034152 20 30 1223496 532800 128000 -1920000 -2560000 -2595704 21.72 965406 182909 25746 -659133 -514929 0 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 21.72 Embeded Length (ft)= 26.06 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 654288 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 3 (d @ M=0 + 20%) 237.9228 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Walt C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xlsCantilever-14 King County SWIM BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 13 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary Load Case T (Ib) LC1 28731 LC2 31994 LC3 40165 M i = 941z, HOES NoT CONTROL 10 GA-NTtt.E VE. (CoNur. (ASE) cot,' mot. f LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 13 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 25012 3.67 91711 Pa2 H 1 13440 12.66 170118 Pa3 H 1 4815 14.21 68418 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Ppl H 1 -15531 15.15713 -235410 Pp2 H 1 -6701 15.88 -106380 SubTotal 28731 0 Dbuml 9.31 (depth into bum fill) LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 13 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -lb) Pal H 1 25012 3.7 91711 Pa2 H 1 13556 12.7 172131 Pa3 H 1 4898 14.3 69866 Esoill E 0.7 6152 1.5 9227 Esoil2 E 0.7 887 10.5 9316 Ewall E 0.7 904 -6.8 -6102 Ewall2 E 0.7 3358 1.5 ' 5037 Ppl H 1 -15821 15.2 -240432 Pp2 H 1 -6953 15.9 -110753 SubTotal 31994 0 Dbum2 9.39 (depth into bum fill) R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 13 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 25012 3.67 91711 Pa2 H 1 12191 12.22 149025 Pa3 H 1 3961 13.63 54002 Psurch 1 Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -12414 14.72419 -182789 Pp2 H 1 -4281 15.30 -65493 SubTotal 40165 0 Dbum3 8.45 (depth into bum fill) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion ProjectData and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIIs\AddressReviewCommentslWall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 14 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary Load Case T (Ib) LC1 31388 LC2 35519 LC3 42522 LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 14 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 29008 4.33 125701 Pa2 H 1 15335 13.93 213673 Pa3 H 1 5404 15.58 84192 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Ppl H 1 -17524 16.43395 -287996 Pp2 H 1 -8531 17.25 -147115 SubTotal 31388 0 Dbuml 9.87 (depth into bum fill) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls.AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls L x Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 14 feet, Normal+Surcharge Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM CW alI-14-Normal+Surcharge.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:26 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label Y fftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -14 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -23.87 0 0 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in] Y [k/in] N4 Reaction Reaction Z [k/inj X Rot.[k-ft/radL Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Rot.[k-f lradL Footin Reaction I Reaction Reaction l Reaction g Basic Load Cases BLC Description 1 Pal +Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.144 0 %100 2 3 X 1.554 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.095 1 0 2 3 Pp1+Pp2 None 2 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 3 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 11 Surch: Pp3+PD4 None 4 Yes Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Locationfft.° 1 M2 X 0 4.144 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.554 1.554 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.095 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 M2 Direction Start Magnitudefk/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft d... Start Location[ft.%1 End Location[ft.%J X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label Di 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.505 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitudejk.k-til -31.388 Locationfft.%J 5 Load Combinations Description SoIvePD... SR... BLC Factor 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes 5 Yes 6 Yes 7 Yes 8 Yes 9 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...1...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-14-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer - Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:26 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) Description SotvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC 10 1 Yes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: .009 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 __ V 11 NC Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 5 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 Yes 0 0 0 5.741 8 3 0 19.992 0 0 0 -31.351 9 4 14 8.855 Yes 0 0 -82.891 10 5 0 -5.316 0 0 0 -89.401 11 1 M3 1 0 15 0 Yes 0 -89.401 12 2 0 -9.488 0 0 0 -71.276 13 3 0 -14.336 16 0 Yes -42.021 14 4 0 -9.133 0 0 0 -12.025 15 5 0 .009 0 17 0 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces C Member Label v Sheartkl 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: .009 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 NC NC 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 -3.885 0 0 0 5.741 8 3 0 19.992 0 0 0 -31.351 9 4 0 8.855 0 0 0 -82.891 10 5 0 -5.316 0 0 0 -89.401 11 1 M3 1 0 -5.316 0 0 0 -89.401 12 2 0 -9.488 0 0 0 -71.276 13 3 0 -14.336 0 0 0 -42.021 14 4 0 -9.133 0 0 0 -12.025 15 5 0 .009 0 0 0 -.006 Joint Reactions Joint La Z rkl 1 1 N4 .009 0 0 0 0 -.006 2 1 Totals: .009 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...\...1...1Wall C\RISA\CWaII-14-Normal+Surcharge.r3dj Page 2 LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 14 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 29008 4.3 125701 Pa2 H 1 15540 14.0 217560 Pa3 H 1 5550 15.7 86950 Esoill E 0.7 7134 2.0 14269 Esoil2 E 0.7 956 11.5 10988 Ewall E 0.7 904 -6.8 -6102 EwaII2 E 0.7 3616 2.0 7232 Ppl H 1 -18000 16.5 -297000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 17.3 -156000 SubTotal 35708 3598 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Bum Fill Depth below bum fill: 0.03 Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 72 19.01 1377 Pa5 H 1 0 19.02 1 Pp3 H 1 -261 19.01 -4963 Pp4 H 1 -1 19.02 -13 SubTotal -189 -3598 Total Load and Moment about A Moment about A Load (Ib) (ft -Ib) LC2 Total 35519 0 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls Ex Results for LC 1, Normal+Seismic Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 14 feet Normal+Seismic Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:24 PM C W aI I-14-Seismi c.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:25 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -14 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -24 0 0 1 5 N5 0 -24.03 0 0 E: Pa4+Pa5 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/inj N5 Reaction Y [k/inj Reaction Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot.[k-ft/radj Z Rot.[k-ft/rad Footing Reaction Reaction Reaction 2 N1 Basic Load Cases Reaction 11 BLC Desc iot 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.144 0 %100 2 3 X 1.554 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 4 E: Ewall+EwaII2 None 2 5 E: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 E: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 8 E: TieBack None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) 0 0 1 M2 X 0 4.144 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.554 1.554 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoill + Esoil2) Member Label Dir 0 0 1 M2 X .728 .728 0 0 2 M3 X .273 .273 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+EwaII2) Member Label Direction Start Maonitudefk/ft d..End Magnitudefk/ft d Start Locationfft 0 1 M1 X .258 .258 0 0 2 M2 X .258 .258 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : E: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudelk/ft d..End Magnitudetk/ft-d Start Locationrft 0 0. 1 M4 X 2.664 2.664 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .003 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Pp1+Pp2) ember La 0 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label 1 M4 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Location[ft.%j X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-14-Seismic.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:25 PM Checked By: Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) (Continued) 2 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitudejk/ft.d... Start Location[ft W End Location[ft,%J 0 E 0 M4 X 0 -.052 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : E: TieBack) Member La bel Direction 1 M2 X Magnitudejk,k- J -35.519 Location[ft.%J 5 Load Combinations Desaiotion SoNePD... SR... B 1 Normal+Seis.. Yes 1 0 1 1 3 .7 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 --- .099 3 2 Yes 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 3 5 Yes -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 11.557 8 3 0 21.991 0 0 0 -27.409 9 4 5 10.239 Yes 0 0 -84.869 10 5 0 -5.138 0 0 0 -94.853 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -94.853 12 2 0 -9 848 0 0 0 -76.265 13 3 0 -15.251 7 0 Yes -45.035 14 4 0 -9.621 0 0 0 -13.152 15 5 0 -.184 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -.184 0 0 0 -.103 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces C Me Axialtkl z Shearfkl 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 3 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 5 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 2 0 -5.403 0 0 0 11.557 8 3 0 21.991 0 0 0 -27.409 9 4 0 10.239 0 0 0 -84.869 10 5 0 -5.138 0 0 0 -94.853 11 1 M3 1 0 -5.138 0 0 0 -94.853 12 2 0 -9 848 0 0 0 -76.265 13 3 0 -15.251 0 0 0 -45.035 14 4 0 -9.621 0 0 0 -13.152 15 5 0 -.184 0 0 0 -.103 16 1 M4 1 0 -.184 0 0 0 -.103 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wa11 CIRISAICWaII-14-Seismic.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:25 PM Checked By: Member Section Forces (Continued) -ftl v -v MomenUk-..z-z MomenUk-. 17 1 N5 2 0 -.132 0 0 0 -.102 18 Totals: .025 3 0 -.08 0 0 0 -.101 19 NC NC 4 0 -.027 0 0 0 -.101 20 5 0 .025 0 0 0 -.101 Joint Reactions X 1k1 MY fk- MZ 1k -ft 1 1 N5 .025 0 0 0 0 -.101 2 1 Totals: .025 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...\...\...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWall-14-Seismic.r3d] Page 3 LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 14 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 29008 4.33 125701 Pa2 H 1 14183 13.56 192373 Pa3 H 1 4623 15.08 69738 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -14857 16.06344 -238651 Pp2 H 1 -6131 16.75 -102705 SubTotal 42522 0 Dbum3 9.13 (depth into bum fill) R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) -59.6 H = 14 feet, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:22 PM C Wall-14-Normal+Surcharge+Imp... Company Designer Job Number Joint Coordinates and Temperatures July 9, 2008 2:27 PM Checked By: Label ft Z fftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 -0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -14 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -23.13 0 0 Joint Boundary Conditions Joint Label 1 N4 X [kin] Reaction Y [Win] Z [k/in] X Rot.jk-ft/rad Y Ro1[k-ft/radj Z Roi[k-ft/rad] Footing Reaction I Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases BLC D t ravuv Y Gray 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.144 0 %100 2 3 X 1.554 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.013 1 0 3 Pp1+Pp2 None 2 8 Surch: lmpact None 1 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember Label Direction Start Maanitu ° 1 M2 X 0 4.144 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.554 1.554 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.013 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 [ M2 Direction Start Magnitude[Wft.d..End Magnitude[Wft d... Start Location[ft.%] .592 [ 0 X 1 .592 End Location[ft.%] 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Ppl+Pp2) be Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End MaanitudefWft.d... Start Locationfft.° 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -2.971 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : Surch: Impact) Member Label Direction 1 M1 1 X Magnitude[k k -ft] 8 Location[ft.%] 1.25 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ft] -42.522 Location[ft.%] 5 Load Combinations Description SolvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 8 1 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...t...1...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-14-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:27 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) Description SoIvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor B 5 Yes 6 Yes 7 Yes 8 Yes 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes • 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC Member Label Sec Axial[k] y She -silk] z Shear[kJ Toroue[k-ft] y -y Moment[k-..z-z Moment[k-... No Data to Print ... Joint Reactions LC Joint Label X [kj Y [k] Z [k] MX [k -ft] MY (k -ft] MZ [k-ftJ No Data to Print ... RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...1...1...\...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaIl-14-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 2 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 15 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary Load Case T (Ib) LC1 34196 LC2 39249 LC3 45086 LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 15 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (lb) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 33300 5.00 166500 Pa2 H 1 16650 15.00 249750 Pa3 H 1 5550 16.67 92500 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Pp1 H 1 -18000 17.5 -315000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 18.33 -165000 SubTotal 36196 40294 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below burn fill: 0.282 k.. irelfirek- Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 784 20.14 15786 Pa5 H 1 4 20.19 77 Pp3 H 1 -2711 20.14 -54611 Pp4 11 1 -77 20.19 -1546 SubTotal -2000 -40294 Total Load and Moment about A LC1 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 34196 0 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewCommentslW all C\W alIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 15 feet, Normal+Surcharge Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:31 PM CWall-15-Normal+Surch.r3d Company Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:31 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures 7 fftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 ._.. 0 .w......,...,... 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -15 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -25 0 0 5 N5 0 -25.282 0 0 Surch: TieBack Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [klin] N5 Reaction Y [Mrt] Reaction Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot.[k-ft/rad] Z Rot.[k-ft/rad] Footing Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases BLC D Point 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.44 0 %100 2 3 X 1.665 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember La 0 1 M2 X 0 4.44 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.665 1.662 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 f M2 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft,d..End Magnitude[k/ft d... Start Location[ft,%1 End Location X f .592 .592 0 13 [ft.%] Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Ppl+Pp2) ember Label Direction Start Maanitudefk(ft.d -End Magnitudefk/ft d - Start Locationfft 9 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft d End Magnitudefk/ft d Start Locationfft 9 0 1 M4 X 2.775 2.775 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .027 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) mber Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d -End Magnitude[k/ft d - Start Locationfft 0 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 _--- 0 2 M4 X 0 -.542 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction M2 X Magnitudejk.k-ft] -34.196 Location[ft.%] 5 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...I...I...1...I..A...1Wall CIRISA\CWafl-15-Normal+Surch.r3dJ Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:31 PM Checked By: Load Combinations Description Soly 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 9 - 1 10 - . 1 11 - _--. 1 __ 3 . _.. .. 1 ___ . __._. ___ ..._._. 2 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 5 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 6.764 8 3 0 21.431 0 0 0 -48.028 9 4 5 8.805 Yes 0 0 -106.02 10 5 0 -6.8 0 0 0 -110.044 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -110.044 12 2 0 -11.308 0 0 0 -87.553 13 3 0 -16.509 7 0 Yes -52.925 14 4 0 -11.151 0 0 0 -17.557 15 5 0 -1.985 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -1.985 0 0 0 -.344 17 2 0 -1.499 0 0 9 -.221 Yes 3 0 -1.005 0 0 0 -.133 19 4 0 -.501 0 0 0 10 20 Yes 5 0 .012 0 0 0 -.062 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC M 7 Shearfk1 'll - tVIVI 1 Ill R- L -L IYIUIIIGtII R- 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: .012 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 -4.301 0 0 0 6.764 8 3 0 21.431 0 0 0 -48.028 9 4 0 8.805 0 0 0 -106.02 10 5 0 -6.8 0 0 0 -110.044 11 1 M3 1 0 -6.8 0 0 0 -110.044 12 2 0 -11.308 0 0 0 -87.553 13 3 0 -16.509 0 0 0 -52.925 14 4 0 -11.151 0 0 0 -17.557 15 5 0 -1.985 0 0 0 -.344 16 1 M4 1 0 -1.985 0 0 0 -.344 17 2 0 -1.499 0 0 0 -.221 18 3 0 -1.005 0 0 0 -.133 19 4 0 -.501 0 0 0 -.08 20 5 0 .012 0 0 0 -.062 Joint Reactions XIkl MY jk-ftl 1 1 N5 .012 0 0 0 0 -.062 2 1 Totals: .012 0 0 1 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 (R:1...1...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-15-Normal+Surch.r3d] Page 2 Company : Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:31 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (Continued) LC Joint Label X k Z k MX k -ft MY (k -ft] 3 1 COG (ft): I NC NC NC MZ [k -ft] RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5(R:\...1...1...1...1...1...1WaII C\RISA\CWall-15-Normal+Surch.r3d] Page 3 LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 15 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 33300 5.0 166500 Pa2 H 1 16650 15.0 249750 Pa3 H 1 5550 16.7 92500 Esoil1 E 0.7 8190 2.5 20475 Esoil2 E 0.7 1024 12.5 12797 EwaII E 0.7 904 -6.8 -6102 Ewa112 E 0.7 3875 2.5 9686 Ppl H 1 -18000 17.5 -315000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 18.3 -165000 SubTotal 42492 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Bum Fill Depth below bum fill: 0.45 65606 Tota M men botiff,Eks f Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 1244 20.22 25162 Pa5 H 1 10 20.30 196 Pp3 H 1 -4304 20.22 -87046 Pp4 H 1 -193 20.30 -3917 SubTotal -3243 -65606 Total Load and Moment about A Load (Ib) LC2 Total 39249 LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 15 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A (ft -Ib) 0 Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (lb) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 33300 5.00 166500 Pa2 H 1 16310 14.90 242993 Pa3 H 1 5326 16.53 88041 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -17266 17.39802 -300390 Pp2 H 1 -8281 18.20 -150 88 SubTotal 45086 0 Burn3 9.80 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls rzit.x Results for LC 1, Nonnal+Surcharge Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 15 feet, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:32 PM C W aII-15-Norrnal+Surcharge+Imp... Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:32 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label ft Z fftl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -15 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -24.796 0 0 Joint Boundary Conditions J 1 oint Label X [k/inL Y [k/in] N4 Reaction Reaction Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot.[k-ft/rad Z Rot.[k-ft/rad Footing Reaction I Reaction I Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases BLC Descri 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.44 0 %100 2 3 X 1.665 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.087 1 0 2 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 8 Surch: Impact None 1 3 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 4 Yes 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) Member Label 0 1 M2 X 0 4.44 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.665 1.665 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.087 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 M2 " Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%1 End Location[ft.%] X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Pp1+Pp2) 0 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.453 5 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : Surch: Impact) 1 Member Label M1 Direction X Magnitudefk.k-ftl 8 Location[ft.%1 1.25 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label 1 M2 Direction Magnitude[k.k-ftl X -45.086 Location[ft.%j 5 Load Combinations Description Solve PD 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 1 2 1 9 1 1 - 1 . _ . 1--. _3_ . _1 __. ___ . _1._. ___ . ____. 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-15-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:32 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) D 5 1 Yes - - - 1 - -- --•--• 0 0 — _„_..,,,.. 0 , v, yaw., ,, a. 0 J . •••S ..JJY,l . 0 .r.-A..vV,1141141,-.. 0 2 Totals: .001 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 NC Yes 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 7 5 Yes -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 8 0 Yes 0 0 0 54.764 8 3 0 24,321 0 0 0 2.748 9 4 9 11.695 Yes 0 0 -66.083 10 5 0 -3.91 0 0 0 -80,944 11 1 M3 1 0 10 0 Yes 0 -80.944 12 2 0 -8.32 0 0 0 -66.104 13 3 0 -13.396 11 0 Yes -39.648 14 4 0 -8.705 0 0 0 -11.412 15 5 0 .001 0 12 0 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces v Shearfkl 1 1 - - - - - M1 - - - 1 - -- --•--• 0 0 — _„_..,,,.. 0 , v, yaw., ,, a. 0 J . •••S ..JJY,l . 0 .r.-A..vV,1141141,-.. 0 2 Totals: .001 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 NC NC 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -12.301 0 0 0 54.764 8 3 0 24,321 0 0 0 2.748 9 4 0 11.695 0 0 0 -66.083 10 5 0 -3.91 0 0 0 -80,944 11 1 M3 1 0 -3.91 0 0 0 -80.944 12 2 0 -8.32 0 0 0 -66.104 13 3 0 -13.396 0 0 0 -39.648 14 4 0 -8.705 0 0 0 -11.412 15 5 0 .001 0 0 0 -.009 Joint Reactions L 7 rki MZ [k-ftl 1 1 N4 .001 0 0 0 0 -.009 2 1 Totals: .001 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...\...1...1...1...1._.IWall C\RISA\CWalI-15-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 2 1.6 2 13.2 Results for LC 1, Normal+Seismic Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) I -120.4 H = 15 feet, Normal+Seismic Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:33 PM C W aII-15-Seismic. r3d Company : Designer : Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:33 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures bef Temn fF1 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 1 3 N3 0 -15 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -25 0 0 1 5 N5 0 -25.45 0 0 E: Pa4+Pa5 Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in] N5 Reaction Y nJ Z [k/iin] X dJ Z Rot.[k-ft/rad] Footing Rot Reaction Reaction Y Rot.[k-ft/ra Reaction Reaction Reaction 2 N1 Basic Load Cases BLC Desc riatio at 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.44 0 %100 2 3 X 1.665 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 4 E: Ewalt+EwaII2 None 2 5 E: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 E: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 8 E: TieBack None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) e D irection Start Maanitudefk/ft d..End Magnitudefk/ft d .. Start Location[ft ° 1 M2 X 0 4.44 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.665 1.665 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoill + Esoil2) Member Label Direction Start Ma 1 M2 X .78 .78 0 0 2 M3 X .293 .293 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+EwaII2) Member Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..1 nd Maanitudefk/ t d..- Start Location[ft o. 1 M1 X .258 .258 0 0 2 M2 X .258 .258 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : E: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Maani 1 M4 X 2.775 2.775 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .043 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) ember La Direction Sta 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label 1 M4 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.°Id End Location[ft.%1 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:I...I...I...I...I...1...1WaIl CIRISAICWaII-15-Seismic.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:33 PM Checked By: Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) (Continued) 2 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitudejk/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%J End Location[ft,%J M4 X 0 -.861 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : E: TieBack) Member Label Direction Magnitudejk.k-ft) Location[ft.%J 1 M2 X -39.249 5 Load Combinations Description SoIvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Seis...Yes M1 1 0 1 1 3 .7 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 .099 3 2 Yes 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 3 5 Yes -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 13.221 8 3 0 23.991 0 0 0 -46.345 9 4 5 10.57 Yes 0 0 -112.447 10 5 0 -7.014 0 0 0 -120.415 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -120.415 12 2 0 -12.036 0 0 0 -96.747 13 3 0 -17.752 7 0 Yes -59.656 14 4 0 -12.399 0 0 0 -21.174 15 5 0 -3.24 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -3.24 0 0 0 -.833 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC Member Label Axialfkl rauerk-ftl v -v Momentfk-..z-z Momentfk-.. 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 3 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 5 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 2 0 -5.999 0 0 0 13.221 8 3 0 23.991 0 0 0 -46.345 9 4 0 10.57 0 0 0 -112.447 10 5 0 -7.014 0 0 0 -120.415 11 1 M3 1 0 -7.014 0 0 0 -120.415 12 2 0 -12.036 0 0 0 -96.747 13 3 0 -17.752 0 0 0 -59.656 14 4 0 -12.399 0 0 0 -21.174 15 5 0 -3.24 0 0 0 -.833 16 1 M4 1 0 -3.24 0 0 0 -.833 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...\...1...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-15-Seismic.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:33 PM Checked By: Member Section Forces (Continued) C Member Label 17 1 N5 2 0 -2.46 0 0 0 -.513 18 Totals: .016 3 0 -1.658 0 0 0 -.281 19 NC NC 4 0 -.833 0 0 0 -.141 20 5 0 .016 0 0 0 -.094 Joint Reactions LC Joi Y fkl 1 1 N5 .016 0 0 0 0 -.094 2 1 Totals: .016 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...I...1Wall CIRISA\CWaII-15-Seismic.r3d] Page 3 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 16 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary, Load Case T (Ib) LC1 37139 LC2 43169 LC3 47839 LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 16 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 37888 5.67 214699 Pa2 H 1 17760 16.00 284160 Pa3 H 1 5550 17.67 98050 Psurch 1 Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Ppl H 1 -18000 18.5 -333000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 19.33 -174000 SubTotal 41894 101453 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Bum Fill Depth below burn fill: 0.651 :* w' o r g,j,ttabp` Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 1878 21.33 40051 Pa5 H 1 20 21.43 436 Pp3 H 1 -6247 21.33 -133225 Pp4 H 1 -407 21.43 -8714 SubTotal -4755 -101453 Total Load and Moment about A LC1 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 37139 0 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xis nVig i:Lx Results for LC 1, Norrnal+Surcharge Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 16 feet, Normal+Surcharge Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:37 PM C W aII-16-Normal+Surch.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:37 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 ........ 2 N2 0 0 0 0 I 3 N3 0 -16 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -26 0 0 5 N5 0 -26.651 0 0 Surch: TieBack Joint Boundary Conditions Joint Label X jk/inJ Y [k/in] Z [Win] 1 N5 Reaction Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases X Rot.jk-ft/radj Y Rot.[k-ft/radL Z Rot.[k-ft/radj Reaction I Reaction Reaction Footing 1 Pal +Pa2+Pa3 None -_.... -� o--- .._.. ... .. _ ...-..... ........ 2 �.. 3 .. . ...................a. �... 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) 0 0 1 M2 X .. -_.... -� o--- .._.. ... ... 4.736 ... . w.. �. O . , .�.. , I.,..11% . 00,... 2 M3 X 1.776 1.776 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label I_ 1 M2 Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft d... Start Locationfft %I End Locationlft.%I X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Pp1+Pp2) M 0 .rH0 1 M3 - ------ X ---....-_ - ._....._........7.... -3.6 .... -3.6 ..w.. �.. .. 1...11)4 5 ._,,.....,.,o.v..,,,.124 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) Member L 0 0 1 M4 X �. _ ... -• - • .. 2.886 _.. ... 2.886 1)w., r1) ..v .l. . !1)1 0 �•.� �v. P. ..1. . /41 0 2 M4 X 0 .062 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) 0 0 1 M4 - -" X -- vnu../VI u.0 a-v..auV.1LR./01 2 M4 X 0 -1.249 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) 1 Member Label Direction Magnitudefk•k-ftl Locationfft.%1 M2 X -37.139 5 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWall-16-Normal+Surch.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:37 PM Checked By: Load Combinations Descri 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 5 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 7.893 8 3 0 22.931 0 0 0 -67.214 9 4 5 8.723 Yes 0 0 -132.101 10 5 0 -8.445 0 0 0 -133.348 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -133.348 12 2 0 -13.232 0 0 0 -106.396 13 3 0 -18.712 7 0 Yes -66.61 14 4 0 -13.637 , 0 0 -25.38 15 5 0 -4.755 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -4.755 0 0 0 -1.598 17 2 0 -3.638 0 0 9 -.914 Yes 3 0 -2.473 0 0 0 -.416 19 4 0 -1.26 0 0 0 10 20 Yes 5 0 .002 0 0 0 -.009 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces C Mem z Shearfkl 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 -4.736 0 0 0 7.893 8 3 0 22.931 0 0 0 -67.214 9 4 0 8.723 0 0 0 -132.101 10 5 0 -8.445 0 0 0 -133.348 11 1 M3 1 0 -8.445 0 0 0 -133.348 12 2 0 -13.232 0 0 0 -106.396 13 3 0 -18.712 0 0 0 -66.61 14 4 0 -13.637 0 0 0 -25.38 15 5 0 -4.755 0 0 0 -1.598 16 1 M4 1 0 -4.755 0 0 0 -1.598 17 2 0 -3.638 0 0 0 -.914 18 3 0 -2.473 0 0 0 -.416 19 4 0 -1.26 0 0 0 -.112 20 5 0 .002 0 0 0 -.009 Joint Reactions LC Joint Label 1 1 N5 X [k] .002 Y [k] 0 Z [k] 0 MX [k -ft] MY [k -ft] 0 0 MZ [k ft] -.009 2 1 Totals: .002 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...1...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaIl-16-Normal+Surch.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:37 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (Continued) LC Joint Label 3 1 COG (ft): X jk] NC Y [k] NC Z [k] NC MX [k -ft] MY [k -ft] MZ [k -ft] RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWall-16-Normal+Surch.r3d] Page 3 LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 16 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Load Pal Pa2 Pa3 Esoil l Esoil2 Ewalt Ewall2 Pp1 Pp2 SubTotal Load Category H H H E E E E H H Factor 1 1 1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 1 1 Load (Ib) 37888 17760 5550 9318 1092 904 4133 -18000 -9000 49645 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below bum fill: Load Pa4 Pa5 Pp3 Pp4 SubTotal Load Category H H H H Total Load and Moment about A LC2 Total Moment about A Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) 5.7 214699 16.0 284160 17.7 98050 3.0 27955 13.5 14742 -6.8 -6102 3.0 12398 18.5 -333000 19.3 -174000 138902 0.86 epi, ', rgl 4I Nio `4.1at o Acis 0 , Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) 1 2492 21.43 1 36 21.58 1 -8288 21.43 1 -716 21.58 -6477 Load (Ib) 43169 Moment about A (ft -Ib) 53402 772 -177636 -15440 -138902 Moment about A (ft -lb) 0 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining W allsWddressReviewCommentslW all C\W aIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls Results for LC 1, Normal+Seismic Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 16 feet, Normal+Seismic Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM C W aII-16-Seismic.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:38 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label X Eft Y rftl Temp FFl 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 Reaction 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -16 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -26 0 0 1 5 N5 0 -26.87 0 0 E: Ewalt+Ewall2 6 N6 0 -5 0 0 2 Joint Boundary Conditions oint La k/iin Z 1 N5 Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction 3 2 N1 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 3 N6 0 3 E: Esoitl + Esoil2 None Basic Load Cases B Cat Gravity Y Gravity Z Grav in Distribut 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.736 0 %100 2 3 X 1.776 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 E: Esoitl + Esoil2 None 2 4 E: Ewalt+Ewall2 None 2 5 E: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 E: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 8 E: TieBack None 1 g Surch: TieBack+Impact None 2 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+Pb4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember LabeL DirectionStart Maonitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudelk/ft.d... Start Locationift %1 End Locatio 1 M2 X 0 4.736 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.776 1.776 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft d... Start Location[ft %J .592 1 0 M2 X .592 End Location[ft.%J %100 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoitl + Esoil2) ember Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d,.End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Location (ft End Locatio 1 M2 X .832 .832 0 0 2 M3 X .312 .312 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+Ewall2) Member Label Direction Start Magnitudefk/ft,d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Location ft End Locationrft 1 M1 X .258 .258 0 0 2 M2 X .258 .258 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : E: Pa4+Pa5) Membe r Label 1 M4 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d. End Mag X 2.886 nitudejk/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%J End Location[ft.%J 2.886 1 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wall CIRISA\CWaII-16-Seismic.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:38 PM Checked By: Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : E: Pa4+Pa5) (Continued) 2 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitudejk/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%J End Location[ft.%] M4 X 0 .084 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label 1 M3 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%] X - 3.6 -3.6 5 End Location[ft.%J 0 2 M3 X 0 - 3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft,%] End Location[ft.%] 1 M4 X - 9.6 - 9.6 0 0 2 M4 X 0 -1.68 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d.,End Magnitude[k/ft.d.. Start Location[ft.%] E M4 X -2.886 -2.886 0 nd Location[ft.%J 0 2 M4 X 0 -.043 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label 1 M4 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%] End Location[ft.%] X -9.6 - 9.6 0 0 2 M4 X 0 -.867 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : E: TieBack) Member Label D irection Magnitude[k.k-ft] Location[ft.%j 1 M2 X -43.169 5 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack+Impact) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ft] -48.452 Location[ft.%] 5 2 M1 X 8 %50 Load Combinations Descriotion SolvePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Fact 1 Normal+Seis...Yes 1 1 3 .7 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 2 Yes 3 Yes 4 Yes 5 Yes 6 Yes 7 Yes 8 Yes 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...1...1...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWall-16-Seismic.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:38 PM Checked By: Load Combinations (Continued) 20 Description Yes SoIverD.. SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC rotor BLC factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC factor 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC Member La Sec Axial ShearfkL z Shea Tor ouefk-ftl v -v Momentfk-..z-z Momentfk-. 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Totals: .065 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 NC NC 3 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 5 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 2 0 -6.633 0 0 0 15.073 8 3 0 26.071 0 0 0 -68.548 9 4 0 10.869 0 0 0 -144.008 10 5 0 -9.068 0 0 0 -149.19 11 1 M3 1 0 -9.068 0 0 0 -149.19 12 2 0 -14.401 0 0 0 -119.998 13 3 0 -20.428 0 0 0 -76.606 14 4 0 -15.352 0 0 0 -31.088 15 5 0 -6.47 0 0 0 -3.016 16 1 M4 1 0 -6.47 0 0 0 -3.016 17 2 0 -4.967 0 0 0 -1.771 18 3 0 -3.376 0 0 0 -.862 19 4 0 -1.699 0 0 0 -.308 20 5 0 .065 0 0 0 -.129 Joint Reactions Dint Label Y fk z MX fk- Yfk- 1 1 N5 .065 0 0 0 0 -.129_ 2 1 Totals: .065 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wall CIRISAICWaIl-16-Seismic.r3d] Page 3 LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 16 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 37888 5.67 214699 Pa2 H 1 17760 16.00 284160 Pa3 H 1 5550 17.67 98050 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -18000 18.5 -333000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 19.33 -174000 SubTotal 49894 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Bum Fill Depth below bum fill: 0.29 ?� 43453 . Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) f ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 849 21.15 17959 Pa5 H 1 4 21.20 88 Pp3 H 1 -2825 21.15 -59737 Pp4 H 1 -83 21.20 -1762 SubTotal -2055 -43453 Total Load and Moment about A LC3 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 47839 0 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIIs\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls Ex Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 16 feet, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM CWalt-16-Normal+Surch+Impact.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:38 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Y fftl Z fft Tema fF Detach From Diao... 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 1 3 N3 0 -16 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -26 0 0 5 N5 0 -26.52 0 0 Impact Joint Boundary Conditions Jo int Label X [Win ] Y [k/in] 1 N5 Reaction Reaction Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad' Y Rot.[k-ft/radj Z Rot.[k-ft/rad] Footi Reaction I Reaction I Reaction Reaction ng j Basic Load Cases Cateaory ravity Z Gravi Joint Point Distributed Area (Me... Surface f.- 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 4.736 0 %100 2 3 X 1.776 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 8 Impact None 1 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+PD4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) defk/ft d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Location ft 1 M2 X 0 4.736 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.776 1.776 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) 1 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%] End Locationfft.%1 M2 X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Pp1+Pp2) irection Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Location fft.%1 End Locationfft 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Location fft.%1 End Location fft.° 1 M4 X 2.886 2.886 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .05 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maonitudefk/ft.d... Start Location fft.° End Locationfft 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 2 M4 X 0 -.998 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : Impact) Member Label Direction 1 M1 X Magnitude[k k -ft] 8 Location[ft.%] 1.25 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...1...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-16-Normal+Surch+Impact.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:38 PM Checked By: Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ftj -47.839 Location[ft.%] 5 Load Combinations Description SoIvePD_.. SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor B 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 0 3 2 Yes 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 3 5 Yes -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 57.893 8 3 0 25.631 0 0 0 -17.314 9 4 5 11.423 Yes 0 0 -93.001 10 5 0 -5.745 0 0 0 -105,048 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -105.048 12 2 0 -10.532 0 0 0 -84.846 13 3 0 -16.012 7 0 Yes -51.81 14 4 0 -10.937 0 0 0 -17.33 15 5 0 -2.055 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -2.055 0 0 0 -.298 17 2 0 -1.167 0 0 9 -.088 Yes 3 0 -.248 0 0 0 .004 19 4 0 .702 0 0 0 10 20 Yes 5 0 1.683 0 0 0 -.18 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces C Member Labe Sec ial Shear[k z Sh Torauefk-ftl v -v Momentfk-..z-z Momentfk- 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -12.736 0 0 0 57.893 8 3 0 25.631 0 0 0 -17.314 9 4 0 11.423 0 0 0 -93.001 10 5 0 -5.745 0 0 0 -105,048 11 1 M3 1 0 -5.745 0 0 0 -105.048 12 2 0 -10.532 0 0 0 -84.846 13 3 0 -16.012 0 0 0 -51.81 14 4 0 -10.937 0 0 0 -17.33 15 5 0 -2.055 0 0 0 -.298 16 1 M4 1 0 -2.055 0 0 0 -.298 17 2 0 -1.167 0 0 0 -.088 18 3 0 -.248 0 0 0 .004 19 4 0 .702 0 0 0 -.025 20 5 0 1.683 0 0 0 -.18 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 jR:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wall C\RISA\CWa11-16-Normal+Surch+Impact.r3d] Page 2 Company : Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 - 2:38 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions C Joint Label Y Ikl MX Ik-ftl 1 1 N5 1.683 0 0 0 0 -.18 2 1 Totals: 1.683 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...1...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaIl-16-Normal+Surch+Impact.r3d] Page 3 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 17 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary Load Case T (Ib) LC1 40217 LC2 47277 LC3 50754 LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 17 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 42772 6.33 270889 Pa2 H 1 18870 17.00 320790 Pa3 H 1 5550 18.67 103600 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Ppl H 1 -18000 19.5 -351000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 20.33 -183000 SubTotal 47888 172823 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below bum fill: 1.018 tvAiiSt Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) fft-Ib) Pa4 H 1 3052 22.51 68705 Pa5 H 1 50 22.68 1129 Pp3 H 1 -9777 22.51 -220075 Pp4 H 1 -996 22.68 -22582 SubTotal -7671 -172823 Total Load and Moment about A LC1 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) �xu 40217 0 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\W aIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 17 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (lb) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 42772 6.3 270889 Pa2 H 1 18870 17.0 320790 Pa3 H 1 5550 18.7 103600 Esoill E 0.7 10520 3.5 36819 Esoil2 E 0.7 1160 14.5 16824 Ewall E 0.7 904 -6.8 -6102 Ewa112 E 0.7 4391 3.5 15369 Ppl H 1 -18000 19.5 -351000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 20.3 -183000 SubTotal 57167 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Bum Fill Depth below burn fill: 1.27 224188 a ©" aboiU A0'* Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 3817 22.64 86411 Pa5 H 1 78 22.85 1779 Pp3 H 1 -12228 22.64 -276793 Pp4 H 1 -1557 22.85 -35586 SubTotal -9890 -224188 Total Load and Moment about A LC2 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 47277 0 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls1AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 17 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 42772 6.33 270889 Pa2 H 1 18870 17.00 320790 Pa3 H 1 5550 18.67 103600 Psu rch l Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -18000 19.5 -351000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 20.33 -183000 SubTotal 55888 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below bum fill: 0.71 114823 > Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 2123 22.35 47450 Pa5 H 1 24 22.47 541 Pp3 H 1 -6799 22.35 -151993 Pp4 H 1 -482 22.47 -10822 SubTotal -5134 -114823 Total Load and Moment about A LC3 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 50754 0 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewCommentslW all C\W aliC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: C (north/east access road) Htb= 18 Height of retained soil (ft) Summary Load Case T (Ib) LC1 43432 LC2 51574 LC3 53824 LC1: Normal+Surcharge Htb= 18 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 47952 7.00 335664 Pa2 H 1 19980 18.00 359640 Pa3 H 1 5550 19.67 109150 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Ppl H 1 -18000 20.5 -369000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 21.33 -192000 SubTotal 54178 254998 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below burn fill: 1.386 Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 4306 23.69 102027 Pa5 H 1 92 23.92 2204 Pp3 H 1 -13301 23.69 -315140 Pp4 H 1 -1843 23.92 -44089 SubTotal -10746 -254998 Total Load and Moment about A LC1 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 43432 0 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls (18' tieback-d,T) Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) -193.9 -188.4 H = 18 feet, Normal+Surcharge Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:42 PM CWail-18-Normal+Surcharge.r3d Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:42 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures Label X fft Y fft Z fft Tema 1F Detach From Dia 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -18 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -28 0 0 5 N5 0 -29.386 0 0 Surch: TieBack Joint Boundary Conditions 1 Joint Label X [k/in] N5 Reaction Y [k/in] Reaction Z 1k/in] X Rot [k-ft/rad] Y Rot [k-ft/rad] Z Rot [k-ft/rad Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Footing Basic Load Cases Descriptio Cat X Gravity Y Gravity Z Gravi Joint Point Distributed Area (Me... Surface 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 5.328 0 %100 2 3 X 1.998 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) Member Label Direction Start Magnitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Location ft End Locat 1 M2 X 0 5.328 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.998 1.998 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 M2 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%J End Location[ft.%] X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Pp1+Pp2) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanit udefk/ft.d... Start Location fft.%1 End Location fft 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Magnitudefk/ft.d..End Magnitudefk/ft.d... Start Location ft End Location fft.° 1 M4 X 3.108 3.108 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .133 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) ember Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitudefk/ft.d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Locationfft.° 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 2 M4 X 0 -2.66 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ft] -43.432 Location[ft.%J 5 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C1RISA\CWaII-18-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:42 PM Checked By: Load Combinations Descriation So1vePD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 5 Yes 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 10.49 8 3 0 26.116 0 0 0 -113.788 9 4 5 8.763 Yes 0 0 -193.921 10 5 0 -12.216 0 0 0 -188.4 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -188.4 12 2 0 -17.558 0 0 0 -151.327 13 3 0 -23.594 7 0 Yes -100.032 14 4 0 -19.073 0 0 0 -45.907 15 5 0 -10.746 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -10.746 0 0 0 -7.84 17 2 0 -8.387 0 0 9 -4.519 Yes 3 0 -5.809 0 0 0 -2.053 19 4 0 -3.013 0 0 0 10 20 Yes 5 0 .003 0 0 0 .009 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces C Member Labe Sec Axial S ea uefk-ftl v -v Moment[k-.. z -z Momeni[k- 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 M2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 -5.661 0 0 0 10.49 8 3 0 26.116 0 0 0 -113.788 9 4 0 8.763 0 0 0 -193.921 10 5 0 -12.216 0 0 0 -188.4 11 1 M3 1 0 -12.216 0 0 0 -188.4 12 2 0 -17.558 0 0 0 -151.327 13 3 0 -23.594 0 0 0 -100.032 14 4 0 -19.073 0 0 0 -45.907 15 5 0 -10.746 0 0 0 -7.84 16 1 M4 1 0 -10.746 0 0 0 -7.84 17 2 0 -8.387 0 0 0 -4.519 18 3 0 -5.809 0 0 0 -2.053 19 4 0 -3.013 0 0 0 -.518 20 5 0 .003 0 0 0 .009 Joint Reactions LC Joint Label X 1 1 N5 [k1 .003 Y [kJ 0 Z [k 0 1 MX [k ft] MY [k -ft] MZ [k ft] 0 0 .009 2 1 Totals: .003 0 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:\...1...1...1...1...1...IWall CIRISA\CWall-18-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:42 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions (Continued) LC Joint Label 3 1 COG (ft): X pc] NC Y pc] NC Z [k] NC MX jk-ft] MY [k -ft] MZ [k -ft] RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-18-Normal+Surcharge.r3d] Page 3 LC2: Normal+Seismic Htb= 18 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (lb) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 47952 7.0 335664 Pa2 H 1 19980 18.0 359640 Pa3 H 1 5550 19.7 109150 Esoill E 0.7 11794 4.0 47174 Esoil2 E 0.7 1229 15.5 19042 Ewalt E 0.7 904 -6.8 -6102 Ewa112 E 0.7 4649 4.0 18598 Ppl H 1 -18000 20.5 -369000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 21.3 -192000 SubTotal 65058 322165 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below bum fill: 1.68 4 a ` @jai R Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -lb) Pa4 H 1 5222 23.84 124501 Pa5 H 1 136 24.12 3269 Pp3 H 1 -16131 23.84 -384559 Pp4 H 1 -2710 24.12 -65376 SubTotal -13483 -322165 Total Load and Moment about A LC2 Total Load (Ib) Moment about A (ft -Ib) 51574 0 9 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls (18' tieback-d,T) Results for LC 1, Normal+Seismic Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) -220 -217 H = 18 feet, Normal+Siesmic Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM C W a II -18 -Seismic. r3d Company : Designer • Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:46 PM Checked By: Joint Coordinates and Temperatures z rfti 1 -. - - Ni - 0 • l. •. 3.5 0 1611... p r 0 ✓[RQIAI r,uij1 u10u... 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -18 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -28 0 0 5 N5 0 -29.68 0 0 E: Pa4+Pa5 Joint Boundary Conditions 7 rkrnl • 1 N5 Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction .. v1_ M Reaction 4 I�Vl.jIVIVIGUj Reaction UWlgll3 2 Ni 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 3 M3 X 0 Basic Load Cases B 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 Non e 0 5.328 0 %100 1 6..., ../1J41VVIriV 3 /v6a IIY/1:.,. uUIId� t. •. 3 E: Esoill + Esoil2 None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 2 0 4 E: Ewall+Ewall2 None 2 5 E: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 6 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 7 E: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 8 E: TieBack None 1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pa1+Pa2+Pa3) 1 M2 X 0 5.328 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.998 1.998 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : E: Esoill + Esoil2) 1 M2 X 1111___.._. ... .. .936 _.........y....w.. v..v ........ .936 Vw. a �Vwu.1I 111 /DI 0 L..V LVIA IIVI111 I. /OI 0 2 M3 X .351 .351 0 5 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 4 : E: Ewalt+Ewall2) 0 1 ---- M 1 -- X _.._...... .258 �,,.. 1111. ..�........... .258 ..w.•.. v1.1 n. /0e 0 a 161.vt.3uV! 1111. /0I 0 2 M2 X .258 .258 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 5 : E: Pa4+Pa5) e 0 fft 0 1 M4 _ X _ 3.108 3.108 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .161 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 6 : Pp1+Pp2) 0 0 1 M3 X - - - -3.6 -3.6 5 0 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) Member Label 1 M4 Direction Start Maanituderk/ft,d..End Maanituderk/ft.d... Start Locationrft.%1 X -9.6 -9.6 0 End Locationrft.%1 0 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1..1Wall CIRISAICWall-18-Seismic.r3d] Page 1 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:46 PM Checked By: Member Distributed Loads (BLC 7 : E: Pp3+Pp4) (Continued) 2 Member Label Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft.d..End Magnitude[k/ft.d... Start Location[ft.%] End Location[ft.%] M4 X 0 -3.226 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : E: TieBack) Member Label Direction 1 M2 X Magnitude[k.k-ft] -51.574 Location[ft.%] 5 Load Combinations Description Solve PD... SR... BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor BLC Factor 1 Normal+Seis...Yes M1 1 0 1 1 3 .7 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 .099 3 2 Yes 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 3 5 Yes -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 19.385 8 3 0 30.464 0 0 0 -123.64 9 4 5 11.37 Yes 0 0 -220.014 10 5 0 -13.719 0 0 0 -216.977 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -216.977 12 2 0 -19.675 0 0 0 -175.38 13 3 0 -26.325 7 0 Yes -118.026 14 4 0 -21.804 0 0 0 -57.072 15 5 0 -13.477 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -13.477 0 0 0 -12.178 9 Yes 10 Yes 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces LC Member Label Axiallk Shear z Shear(k Torauerk-ftl v -v Momentrk-..z-z Momentfk- 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 -.226 0 0 0 .099 3 3 0 -.452 0 0 0 .395 4 4 0 -.677 0 0 0 .889 5 5 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 6 1 M2 1 0 -.903 0 0 0 1.58 7 2 0 -8.009 0 0 0 19.385 8 3 0 30.464 0 0 0 -123.64 9 4 0 11.37 0 0 0 -220.014 10 5 0 -13.719 0 0 0 -216.977 11 1 M3 1 0 -13.719 0 0 0 -216.977 12 2 0 -19.675 0 0 0 -175.38 13 3 0 -26.325 0 0 0 -118.026 14 4 0 -21.804 0 0 0 -57.072 15 5 0 -13.477 0 0 0 -12.178 16 1 M4 1 0 -13.477 0 0 0 -12.178 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:1...\...\...1...\...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-18-Seismic.r3d] Page 2 Company : Designer Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:46 PM Checked By: Member Section Forces (Continued) -ttl v -v nnomentlK-..z-z MomennK- 17 1 N5 2 0 -10.59 0 0 0 -7.112 18 Totals: .004 3 0 -7.38 0 0 0 -3.327 19 NC NC 4 0 -3.849 0 0 0 -.958 20 5 0 .004 0 0 0 -.139 Joint Reactions X fkl k MX fk-ftl MY fk-ft 1 1 N5 .004 0 0 0 0 -.139 2 1 Totals: .004 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5[R:1...1...1...1...1...1...1Wall CIRISA\CWatl-18-Seismic.r3d] Page 3 Lx Results for LC 1, Normal+Surcharge Member z Bending Moments (k -ft) H = 18 feet, Normal+Surcharge+Impact Loads July 9, 2008 at 2:45 PM C W aII-18-Normal+Surcharge+Imp... Company : Designer Job Number : Joint Coordinates and Temperatures July 9, 2008 2:45 PM Checked By: Label X Y fft 1 N1 0 3.5 0 0 %100 2 N2 0 0 0 0 None 3 N3 0 -18 0 0 0 4 N4 0 -28 0 0 5 N5 0 -29.11 0 0 Surch: Impact Joint Boundary Conditions Joint Label X [Win] Y [Wind Z [k/in] X Rot.[k-ft/rad] Y Rot,[k-ft/rad] Z Rot[k-ft/rad] Footing 1 N5 Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Reaction Basic Load Cases BLC Des avity Y Gravity Z G 1 Pal+Pa2+Pa3 None 0 5.328 0 %100 2 3 X 1.998 2 Surch: Psurchl None 3 M3 X 0 1.11 1 0 3 Ppl+Pp2 None 2 8 Surch: Impact None 1 9 Surch: TieBack None 1 10 Surch: Pa4+Pa5 None 2 11 Surch: Pp3+Pp4 None 2 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 1 : Pal+Pa2+Pa3) ember Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End MaanitudeEWft.d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Locati 1 M2 X 0 5.328 0 %100 2 M3 X 1.998 1.998 0 0 3 M3 X 0 1.11 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 2 : Surch: Psurchl) Member Label 1 M2 Direction Start Magnitude[k/ft d.. End Magnitude[k/ft d... Start Location[ft.%] End Location[ft.%1 X .592 .592 0 13 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 3 : Ppl+Pp2) Member Label _ Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End_Maonitudefkifl d... Start Location E 1 M3 X -3.6 -3.6 5 0 0 M4 2 M3 X 0 -3.6 5 i 0 _1 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 10 : Surch: Pa4+Pa5) Member Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maonitudefk/ft.d... Start Location fft,%1 End Location 1 M4 X 3.108 3.108 0 0 2 M4 X 0 .133 0 0 Member Distributed Loads (BLC 11 : Surch: Pp3+Pp4) ember Label Direction Start Maanitudefk/ft.d..End Maanitude(Wft.d... Start Locationfft.%1 End Locat 1 M4 X -9.6 -9.6 0 0 2 M4 X 0 -2.66 0 0 Member Point Loads (BLC 8 : Surch: Impact) Member Label Direction Magnitude[k k -ft] Location[ft.%] 1 M1 X 8 1.25 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...1...1...\...1...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaIl-18-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 1 Company : Designer : Job Number : July 9, 2008 2:45 PM Checked By: Member Point Loads (BLC 9 : Surch: TieBack) Member Label Direction Magnitude[k.k-ft] Location[ft.%] 1 M2 X -53.824 5 Load Combinations for BLC Fa 1 Normal+Sur... Yes 1 0 1 1 2 1 9 1 10 1 11 1 3 1 8 1 0 3 2 Yes 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 3 5 Yes -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 4 0 Yes 0 0 0 64.49 8 3 0 28.508 0 0 0 -65.356 9 4 5 11.155 Yes 0 0 -156.253 10 5 0 -9.824 0 0 0 -161.496 11 1 M3 1 0 6 0 Yes 0 -161.496 12 2 0 -15.166 0 0 0 -130.403 13 3 0 -21.202 7 0 Yes -85.088 14 4 0 -16.681 0 0 .0 -36.943 15 5 0 -8.354 0 8 0 Yes 16 1 M4 1 0 -8.354 0 0 0 -4.856 17 2 0 -6.465 0 0 9 -2.796 Yes 3 0 -4.4 0 0 0 -1.284 19 4 0 -2.161 0 0 0 10 20 Yes 5 0 .255 0 0 0 -.101 11 Yes 12 Yes 13 Yes 14 Yes 15 Yes 16 Yes 17 Yes 18 Yes 19 Yes 20 Yes 21 Yes 22 Yes 23 Yes 24 Yes 25 Yes 26 Yes Member Section Forces Sec z Shearrkl k-ftl v -v Momenttk-..z-z Momentfk-.. 1 1 M1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 -8 0 0 0 4 4 4 0 -8 0 0 0 11 5 5 0 -8 0 0 0 18 6 1 M2 1 0 -8 0 0 0 18 7 2 0 -13.661 0 0 0 64.49 8 3 0 28.508 0 0 0 -65.356 9 4 0 11.155 0 0 0 -156.253 10 5 0 -9.824 0 0 0 -161.496 11 1 M3 1 0 -9.824 0 0 0 -161.496 12 2 0 -15.166 0 0 0 -130.403 13 3 0 -21.202 0 0 0 -85.088 14 4 0 -16.681 0 0 .0 -36.943 15 5 0 -8.354 0 0 0 -4.856 16 1 M4 1 0 -8.354 0 0 0 -4.856 17 2 0 -6.465 0 0 0 -2.796 18 3 0 -4.4 0 0 0 -1.284 19 4 0 -2.161 0 0 0 -.37 20 5 0 .255 0 0 0 -.101 RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...1...\...\...1...1...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-18-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 2 Company Designer Job Number July 9, 2008 2:45 PM Checked By: Joint Reactions X fkl Y MX fk-ftl k -ft Mzfk 1 1 N5 .255 0 0 0 0 -.101 2 1 Totals: .255 0 0 3 1 COG (ft): NC NC NC RISA -3D Version 6.0.1.5 [R:\...\...\...\...\...\...\Wall C\RISA\CWaII-18-Normal+Surcharge+Impact.r3d] Page 3 LC3: Normal+Surcharge+Vehicle Impact Htb= 18 Loads and Moments about A due to Constant Loads Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) jft-Ib) Pal H 1 47952 7.00 335664 Pa2 H 1 19980 18.00 359640 Pa3 H 1 5550 19.67 109150 Psurchl Surch 1 7696 1.50 11544 Impact L 1 8000 -7.25 -58000 Ppl H 1 -18000 20.5 -369000 Pp2 H 1 -9000 21.33 -192000 SubTotal 62178 Loads and Moments about A due to Loads below Burn Fill Depth below burn fill: 1.11 196998 Moment about A Load Load Category Factor Load (Ib) Arm (ft) (ft -Ib) Pa4 H 1 3459 23.56 81474 Pa5 H 1 59 23.74 1411 Pp3 H 1 -10683 23.56 -251658 Pp4 H 1 -1189 23.74 -28226 SubTotal -8354 -196998 Total Load and Moment about A Moment about A Load (Ib) (ft -Ib) LC3 Total 53824 0 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall C\WaIIC-eastaccesswglacial-7-01.xls (18' tieback-d,T) RWB SO 31 Ii*1iFCI( COMP. CMI('y CHK. 2r►�- REV. DATE 1-13- og DATE `og DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGE$ WALL C Co wFku t3 C& LOA -0 Port- tb' VMA.. = PR= 37 (I8)= .666 ps4` rE = 6.C(18) = (tl psf- Ps.,..O.. = 1(3'7); 34 'J F- DESt(s(.OA-D = (,6tF 4- l.(.S.lrGi- o' Mott r(.06 1.(01+ = l'f) /.c, = 1164 I, (1H 1.0c- _ 66l, (1.6)4 = 1(53 CO ILE w 1-110 Jt sS = q„ Iter (8)2- = 8,`{t3 Pt -lb 6 As „, _ 2. �r( .i.) 0,55- i I2 (As GHEGK- .4f Kw. /4sn�r = 0-003) (11)(9.18) 7 0.1-1►►^t AS h,_ 0•6°( 61/(1) = 019 till - G .Ck SHR- �_ j j (8) = ct-No 2 47 (o..S) 0Z) ( j'. Z6 ) L16-72, > 4790 or. or 11- 30/20k. PE / P:,•d, 318 lo.S1 CA -<-i .316 7. I t RWB SD 31 COMP. LM&- CHK. R -a L REV. DATE 7' 8-08 DATE 7 "7-'4'D/ DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES 0-1c1<- 4' c i -N n t-Ev M = wA1" = 1I6S (4).1- = 19950 4+-I6 2 9.4 _ 0.5S #1 mit oK. I-1-El4 DR) sibbs m P I ik-s T= I' e,S (e) = 9960 1) 134 0' = 6" �" Pd = 4 iFc. r i -=(;es1) CIT) (61 I6S6B 16,6 K. o.9#1.1.- -r+ .2 -r+V =_ 60 + 12(00 6.31 0.31 34 -64S < &o wt •Y c..4,cka.-..-. ./= o.1s (tom)( 0(1.4) = 12(O 16 O IL lrr 2- 1- A A sla , 0,31 ;^z. PQ.-DVIDE 2 S/6 K 6 itta406p 31\'DS 1 t," SPA -c 16- aN .11E Ps ,Er_ RMB BB 31 n lit lif[1 eckatN �,. Uodl DkSn t/V ALL L A A4 COMP. LM(r CHK. 16^^4-- REV. DATE 1-I0- 0e DATE -7 -74.-04 DATE PROJECT FILE HO PAGE OF PAGE: Top gblfl M etre-% 2' 4, If, K 0%01 J JJJJJ I $0IL 8' j J v ✓ J J J J 4 d o b. 6EAY' pt-ts AT grn4 erJos '_ Go NTINRI9U5 RWEgAt- (►JO Conn JT) Mit M.&i& seams = C wf 4- PA) t' _ (iso(g)� + 8000(.8)) i.6 = t3't'io 4-_t Pswi= 4 Z D.LiS til X12 4(1,S) Tit f SA+s M nr 192 = [i()L� 461.31)(4P0=1:152-0 (6 2 2 RW8 SD 31 COMP. 1PAG- CHK. 2•"- REV, DATE 1-1 Oa DATE %-14-0 DATE PROJECT FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES MAIcinvr -nC 13AC LEW6-11-F (1tWAS-�,., d= 12' (07.0) 1,4 -It 1.8 AP P t --Y 11) 7\E Om- s ) \N 1/ 1 = -SS= V-5 +AA 30= `I L i L= 2`1 0.5a = 42 30° 16� L, L•L Z.S -I-an 30 : Li 3.0 fan 30= II) L ' 111 L 2 = 74- 1.11 C +ASSUME 't' 6JAcl, 1-F 6 , P'' ),, Liv LZ = 3boEs Not coolgo L Mt' awe SD 31 II* IiEft COMP. (,MCr CHK. "� REV. DATE 1.1.0 /1 DATE -7 -7A DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES Tie Roos T41 ` 1(S66 tL (alt-Svral,-ittek t, 16' wAtk,, unvuxised 331.) 60 Ksi. Ste( Ft - t.66 (60)=. 39.6 k.sti l i cb8 A9- 6 = 1,60 1-•,1' 414 bo-' (A z -2-S- dam^- = 1.693 in RWB SO 31 [SII' j]E[I( COMP. t -MV' CHK. ("""- REV. DATE 1-1'1361 DATE 7_lt-0g DATE PROJECT FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES XX EX&ttr of Art•Jc ttoR W Prw Wow_sr cede � H = ( 8 = 1 I (07 (IMpAcir «- Nowm, +S�Rcrt S l •16 S (NorcM '- f- Sw_utf 6659 y ( NoKM AL 4- SE11c•+tc.) KA = 1— Sir 30 = 0,33 (-►-S�n30 Las ?5 = 0'13 ri 1 t 0) = ,3 PAF Kph = 1+-s%:" 30 (Ito) I -S' 3o 330 ) I4 (.-woES 317. FS ' FOR- INSTANTANEOUS 1 AP CASE (HIEN• IMr°A-c-I )) USE FS 1,10 • F0t2 cotsnNVOuS (NO*.,vvA`) LOAQS, USE FS - 1,65 KPS = 33o1i.10 = 300 e' - kr _ 31°/ GS = zoo Pie 1\109 -MPA- t t1112 -A-14- t Veit IMr & NecrIkt✓ 4- JOS rtty 11S136-,(30,(6-2)tf f 30001-) = 31S' 1400-0AA-4- s w- M 511GS= 2tso(g_±) H+ T 8 445.0 or.tP-o't,S (sec SEmnot4) RW8 SD 31 �11!Ii[[I( COMP. UM(- CHK. Q-''1'-- REV. DATE 1'3: dg DATE 7 `It -o 5 DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGE Cf{Ec r. Curwa 5Ec lOr-t OF- p-IJc-WOE. tiA-i L T = 7 IS134 IIX (N+ -Sr Ke• = 300 p`f �, = s i2- 5 a,k, for /0403.-- ` 31- 3 8 RWB SD 31 �lt!jjE[K COMP. UM(r CHK. R"^"�- REV. DATE l' 'oh DATE 7 -1-1-4O6 DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES 41,E.,- WA(\ . 300(5-‘7c)= 11 tiS M CRA,it4P = 1125l ad- -+ (01 : -S)L + : (4,10/742) 2 z 6 nn 9366 +- ilo6 + I139 = 121`\ f+ - 16 M., = 1 Lag) = o : 1n1- #Sa IZ Vfl T 4a y(ss,$) w= 3olS(1.(,)= 44.zo JJJJJJ JJJ J T r T "2z-- 4920 (6)% 3936o e 6 Mu ; 39.y 0, VS t01 4 •I 4 CIS, s RWB SD 31 COMP. L.,•^G' CHK. (2"44- REV. DATE 7. 7- og DATE i -Le-05 DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE OF PAGE: d back Co h r- ,+' r P‘,( qj Max.(oo-d= 72� Nate, ,,6.I h.t( 4 �6 x 3/4 to 7-12 3Z, SIS Lf = '1,151) (`f ) 50ob 9000 = 4801) Psi (4 -1,$)(0. -is) M - Z ZC? (4)2 = r -- z S„„1 � n d 1 0 0.0= bt2 = 04-15") {7- .. = 1126 use p `' 6 6 , 0,-6-) it3 3 3 S A{-F(,Rtn loo / S{ 41.,a _ 1242. s ? 000 3 r= y(tit )/z=a.04(l k`' k = '1('/.) _ 2.o fv r= J i/ = 0,.04,`.13 -41 - S = r,_ L Z cc.'- / Ib 3 , _ (Ke /' )3 R [r 8 Cc. (€1-1) RWB SD 31 fill! jj E CI{ COMP. LW (r CHK. 2'^ L� REV. DATE I-7- OE DATE 7'1-t-0ma DATE PROJECT FILE NO. PAGE OF PAGES Cc= 1L6 — 4S2 36 z -62 A1 = (B,7 54.3(1S) 3 5(,zb) 18,-1, x9x 31 R. 36K - is aitc z f 00,41 11.10-x load = 12 k cty„-, l.Do = Ci .10) = II.S k. [ N (mai c4 -e vol/t0OPA- 4-1 0K - C OAcrc-l—c. laeb-(v‘4 Ocs�r k.")st-nn9+1. = 4a, BS�'� 0 CoS (0. (3 ) ( 1M) 22(0 ps A-ILo1,.,a Mmol-f1,h / 1 �fv 2.0 4 Az 2 (-1.1_11)) plcdsz., = IIS 00o = 2.12. I I'n 2 SW( x S 1/4 44 (SU 10 )(IC, t L Uy1, PL d C p.5 M o,n cv.f = wS,` 2. Snx�'d = 1O�tz) = 0,y0. 2�nn 1 osv = 72.0 p5" l� A(1 to -r1 9--=i430Des 12-0(s)72 9 0 oo /to = 900 to 11-2- bk. 6 RWS SO 31 R'IIIECI( 1. aininci UM' tCiicv1 610.1 COMP. L/" M G- CNK. N'"'-- REV. DATE Co' '1'06 DATE 7 -9Z DATE PROJECT 1W 1-4 FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES CO�ic �w Ka Tei SIoeLn' IoALl- fl laz. lJ (,.1oki1 (34f:IV) f 4 ) Sint e Citj Sur' �- Is) Su^ e sw (a- F-0 Sm3') � Z SL^2C 6°� I + SLh3 6 (SiN (36- 19 .y) ) S•L^ 90 (SIM (10+18 .4)) O.(D 0,32 I (1 +- os L6 )-- o.,5 K‘- u = 13S10.32-) = 93,2 P`f Wall D Soldier Pile without Vehicle Barrier Retained Soil Wall Height Pile ID Sta Offset Height for Analysis D2 14+80.44 20.00L 1.6 2 Embed Depth Section W 1.2x58 Pile Length 11 20 t=om D4 14+93.55 20.02L 3.35 • 4 12 W 12x58 16 i; D8 15+19.77 20.03L 5.78 6 14 D10 15+32.88 20.03L 5 14 D12 4 ate, 15+45.99 20.02L 3.39 4 12 W 12x58 W 12x58 W12x58 20 19 16 "i3 0 pr D14 15+59.10 20.01L 1.66 W 12x58 11 R:1Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion ProjectlData and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Waif DIWaIID-SoldierPile.xls King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin fY Wall D (along Road A) fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic 2 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 275 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 43 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 3 ft min pile depth per geotech 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 9.0 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 18569 Req'd Sec Mod= 7 LC2 3.43 2539 1 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaUID-SoldierPile.xls Page 1 of 10 **ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS" L 7- 2 I V 9 Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 2 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pa 1 H 1 2752 1.33 3669 Psurch Surch 1 2240 2.00 4480 TOTAL 4992 8149 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 4992 Ib 8149 ft -ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((y***3*d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 8149 0 0 0 0 8149 1 13141 215 18 88 -288 13174 2 18133 860 143 350 -2300 17187 3 23125 1935 484 788 -7763 18569 4 28117 3440 1147 1400 -18400 15704 5 33109 5375 2240 2188 -35938 6974 6 38101 7740 3870 3150 -62100 -9239 7 43093 10535 6145 4288 -98613 -34551 8 48085 13760 9173 5600 -147200 -70581 9 53077 17415 13061 7088 -209588 -118946 10 58069 21500 17917 8750 -287500 -181264 11 63061 26015 23847 10588 -382663 -259152 12 68053 30960 30960 0 -496800 -366827 13 73045 36335 39363 0 -631638 -482894 14 78037 42140 49163 0 -788900 -619559 15 83029 48375 60469 0 -970313 -778439 16 88021 55040 73387 0 -1177600 -961152 17.75 96757 67738 100196 0 -1607803 -1343111 18.5 100501 73584 113442 0 -1820342 -1532815 19.5 105493 81754 132850 0 -2131777 -1811680 5.494046802 35576 6490 2971 2641 -47678 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 5.49 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 749 Embeded Length (ft)= 8.99 Mmax (ft -lb)= 18569 x the wall height= 4.50 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 3 (d @ M=0 + 20%) Find Vmax V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 4992 0 0 0 0 4992 1 4992 430 54 175 -863 4788 2 4992 860 215 350 -3450 2967 3 4992 1290 484 525 -7763 -472 4 4992 1720 860 700 -13800 -5528 5 4992 2150 1344 875 -21563 -12202 6 4992 2580 1935 1050 -31050 -20493 12.5 4992 5375 8398 0 -134766 -116000 R:1Seattie111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WaIIs\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WalID-SoidierPile.xls Page 2 of 10 Load Case: 2 H= 2 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Pal H Psurch Surch Exconc E Ea E TOTAL Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mrax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor Depth below H (d) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2.86 M ((V+d)+M') 1236 2701 4166 5631 7096 8561 10026 11491 12956 14421 15886 17351 18816 20281 21746 23211 24676 26141 27606 5425 H 1 Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) 1 688 0.67 459 0 0 1.00 0 0.7 631 1.00 631 0.7 146 1.00 146 1465 Ib 1236 ft -lb MPa2 0 108 430 968 1720 2688 3870 5268 6880 8708 10750 13008 15480 18168 21070 24188 27520 31068 34830 879 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 2.86 Embeded Length (ft)= 3.43 x the wall height= 1.72 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 2539 Depth (ft)= 1.0 1465 1236 H 1 Surch 0 MPa3 MPsurch2 0 0 18 0 143 0 484 0 1147 0 2240 0 3870 0 6145 0 9173 0 13061 0 17917 0 23847 0 30960 0 39363 0 49163 0 60469 0 73387 0 88025 0 104490 0 419 0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) H 1 MPp ((rilerdA3)/6) 0 -288 -2300 -7763 -18400 -35938 - 62100 - 98613 -147200 - 209588 -287500 - 382663 - 496800 - 631638 - 788900 -970313 - 1177600 - 1412488 -1676700 -6723 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Mtotal 1236 2539 2439 -681 -8438 -22450 -44334 -75709 -118191 -173398 -242948 - 328457 - 431544 -553826 - 696921 -862446 -1052018 -1267255 -1509774 0 Page 3 of 10 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin fY Wall D (along Road A) fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic 4 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 550 lb/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 43 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 6 ft min pile depth per geotech 50 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 11.5 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 49979 Req'd Sec Mod= 18 LC2 6.17 15808 6 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Anaiytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D1WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Page 4 of 10 "ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS'* Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 4 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 6192 2.00 12384 Psurch Surch 1 3360 3.00 10080 TOTAL 9552 22464 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 9552 Ib 22464 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$*3*d^3)/6) Mtotal 0 22464 0 0 0 0 22464 1 32016 323 18 88 -288 32156 2 41568 1290 143 350 -2300 41051 3 51120 2903 484 788 -7763 47531 4 60672 5160 1147 1400 -18400 49979 5 70224 8063 2240 2188 -35938 46776 6 79776 11610 3870 3150 -62100 36306 7 89328 15803 6145 4288 -98613 16951 8 98880 20640 9173 5600 -147200 -12907 9 108432 26123 13061 7088 -209588 -54884 10 117984 32250 17917 8750 -287500 -110599 11 127536 39023 23847 10588 -382663 -181669 12 137088 46440 30960 12600 -496800 -269712 13 146640 54503 39363 14788 -631638 -376345 14 156192 63210 49163 17150 -788900 -503185 15 165744 72563 60469 19688 -970313 -651850 16 175296 82560 73387 22400 -1177600 -823957 17.75 192012 101608 100196 27568 -1607803 -1186419 18.5 199176 110376 113442 29947 -1820342 -1367402 19.5 208728 122631 132850 33272 -2131777 -1634296 7.612907794 95182 18691 7905 5071 -126850 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 7.61 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 9.61 Embeded Length (ft)= 11.54 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 49979 x the wall height= 2.88 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 4 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotal 0 9552 0 0 0 0 9552 1 9552 645 54 175 -863 9563 2 9552 1290 215 350 -3450 7957 3 9552 1935 484 525 -7763 4733 4 9552 2580 860 700 -13800 -108 5 9552 3225 1344 875 -21563 -6567 6 9552 3870 1935 1050 -31050 -14643 7 9552 4515 2634 1225 -42263 -24337 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaIID-SoldierPile_xls Page 5 of 10 Load Case: 2 H= 4 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point A) Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal 11 1 2752 1.33 3669 Psurch Surch 0 0 2.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 1263 2.00 2526 Ea E 0.7 582 2.00 1165 TOTAL 4597 7360 Base Reactions Shear (V) Moment at A (M) Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor H 1 4597 Ib 7360 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) ((V*d)+M*) MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$*3*d"3)16) Mtotal 0 7360 0 0 0 0 7360 1 11957 215 18 0 -288 11902 2 16554 860 143 0 -2300 15257 3 21151 1935 484 0 -7763 15808 4 25749 3440 1147 0 -18400 11935 5 30346 5375 2240 0 -35938 2023 6 34943 7740 3870 0 -62100 -15547 7 39540 10535 6145 0 -98613 -42392 8 44137 13760 9173 0 -147200 -80129 9 48735 17415 13061 0 -209588 -130377 10 53332 21500 17917 0 -287500 -194752 11 57929 26015 23847 0 -382663 -274871 12 62526 30960 30960 0 -496800 -372354 13 67123 36335 39363 0 -631638 -488816 14 71721 42140 49163 0 -788900 -625876 15 76318 48375 60469 0 -970313 -785151 16 80915 55040 73387 0 -1177600 -968258 17 85512 62135 88025 0 -1412488 -1176816 18 90109 69660 104490 0 -1676700 -1412441 5.14 31009 5689 2439 0 -39137 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 5.14 Embeded Length (ft)= 6.17 x the wall height= 1.54 Mmax (ft -lb)= 15808 Depth (ft)= 3.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewCommentslWall D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Page 6 of 10 King County SWMD BLPTF Structural Calculations Wall: H E S T Wconc Sx L EFWA EFWP DIA dmin fy Wall D (along Road A) fb Load Factor Matrix Construction Seismic 6 ft Wall height 6.5 xH Seismic 70 psf Vehicle Surcharge 0.92 ft Concrete facing thickness 825 Ib/ft 0.41 xW seismic coefficient 8 ft distance between piles 43 psf active 230 psf passive 2.5 ft pile diameter 9 ft min pile depth per geotech 50 (0.66*fy) 33 Load Case ASCE Load Case (LC) D E H Surch 2.4.1-3 1 1 0 1 1 2.4.1-5 2 1 0.7 1 0 SUMMARY LC1 d(ft)= 13.9 Mmax(ft-Ib)= 103954 Req'd Sec Mod= 38 LC2 8.88 47491 17 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining WallsWddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Page 7 of 10 **ENTRY REQ'D FOR BOLD, HIGHLIGHTED CELLS** Load Case: 1 (H' = H+2) H= 6 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -lb) Pal H 1 11008 2.67 29355 Psurch Surch 1 4480 4.00 17920 TOTAL 15488 47275 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type Factor 15488 ib 47275 ft -Ib H 1 H 1 Surch H 1 1 Depth below H' M MPp (d) ((V`d)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((y*4*3*d413)/6) Mtotal 0 47275 0 0 0 0 47275 1 62763 430 18 88 -288 63011 2 78251 1720 143 350 -2300 78164 3 93739 3870 484 788 -7763 91117 4 109227 •6880 1147 1400 -18400 100253 5 124715 10750 2240 2188 -35938 103954 6 140203 15480 3870 3150 -62100 100603 7 155691 21070 6145 4288 -98613 88581 8 171179 27520 9173 0 -147200 60672 9 186667 34830 13061 0 -209588 24970 10 202155 43000 17917 0 -287500 -24429 11 217643 52030 23847 0 -382663 -89143 12 233131 61920 30960 0 -496800 -170789 13 248619 72670 39363 0 -631638 -270986 14 264107 84280 49163 0 -788900 -391350 15 279595 96750 60469 0 -970313 -533499 16 295083 110080 73387 0 -1177600 -699051 17.75 322187 135477 100196 0 -1607803 -1049943 18.5 333803 147168 113442 0 -1820342 -1225930 19.5 349291 163508 132850 0 -2131777 -1486129 9.541988204 195061 39151 15566 0 -249778 0 d below H' for Mtotal=0(ft)= 9.54 d below H for Mtotal=0(ft)= 1.1.54 Embeded Length (f)= 13.85 Mmax (ft -Ib)= 103954 x the wall height= 2.31 Depth for Mmax (ft)= 5 Find Vmax (d @ M=0 + 20%) V(base) Vpa2 Vpa3 Vpsurch2 Vpp Vtotat 0 15488 0 0 0 0 15488 1 15488 860 54 175 -863 15714 2 15488 1720 215 350 -3450 14323 3 15488 2580 484 525 -7763 11314 4 15488 3440 860 700 -13800 6688 5 15488 4300 1344 875 -21563 444 6 15488 5160 1935 1050 -31050 -7417 7 15488 6020 2634 1225 -42263 -16896 R:\Seattlel11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls'AddressReviewComments\Wats D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Page 8 of 10 Load Case: 2 H= 6 Calculate Base Reactions (at Ground/point Al Load Type Factor Horz (Ib) Arm (ft) Mom (ft -Ib) Pal H 1 6192 2.00 12384 Psurch Surch 0 0 3.00 0 Exconc E 0.7 1894 3.00 5683 Ea E 0.7 1310 3.00 3931 TOTAL 9397 21998 Base Reactions Shear(V) Moment at A (M') Find Mmax and Depth where Mtotal=0 Load Type H Factor 1 9397 Ib 21998 ft -Ib H 1 Surch H 0 1 Depth below H M MPp (d) (Ord)+M') MPa2 MPa3 MPsurch2 ((r$*3*d"3)/6) Mtotal 0 21998 0 0 0 0 21998 1 31394 323 18 0 -288 31447 2 40791 1290 143 0 -2300 39924 3 50188 2903 484 0 -7763 45811 4 59584 5160 1147 0 -18400 47491 5 68981 8063 2240 0 -35938 43345 6 78377 11610 3870 0 -62100 31757 7 87774 15803 6145 0 -98613 11109 8 97171 20640 9173 0 -147200 -20216 9 106567 26123 13061 0 -209588 -63837 10 115964 32250 17917 0 -287500 -121370 11 125360 39023 23847 0 -382663 -194433 12 134757 46440 30960 0 -496800 -284643 13 144154 54503 39363 0 -631638 -393618 14 153550 63210 49163 0 -788900 -522976 15 162947 72563 60469 0 -970313 -674334 16 172343 82560 73387 0 -1177600 -849310 17 181740 93203 88025 0 -1412488 -1049520 18 191137 104490 104490 0 -1676700 -1276583 7.40 91517 17652 7255 0 -116425 0 d for Mtotal=0(ft)= 7.40 Embeded Length (ft)= 8.88 x the wall height= 1.48 Mmax (ft -lb)= 47491 Depth (ft)= 4.0 (d @ M=0 + 20%) R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Page 9 of 10 Wall D Soldier Pile - Summary Table H W (Pa) (k) dmin (1.5H (ft) dcalc3 (ft) Mmax (ft -Ib) d' (ft) Sreq (50 ksi) Section (50 ksi) I (in4) S (in3) 4 ; . p t;,3 vy9"0 6 11.5 519A 49979 n 'Sk;sG--ios 12 a' 18 St x. W12x58 s 475 kcb mr:.- 78 � zt' a r9el li 1�3..r,..�.:..;�=LT. 101439„54��: 1 14b� 21191''..'f:, 1,WO2R58 r 75:a 7 s1�7,8 Calculate Deflection for Construction Load Case H W (Pa) (k) a(Pa) (in) w (Psurch) (k/in) a (Psurch) (in) A Total (in) A2275> arowIi—b., •_ rQ.:0;1,7 t.) F ; . p t;,3 4 6.19 0.01 0.026 0.01 0.02 i 767155:5 -r f:2E MO, 103 K! i107 `''t. 1. d is the greater of dcalc and dmin, rounded up to nearest whole foot. 2. Section req'd for 10" flange, req'd S, total deflection of 2" max. 3. dcalc is the maximum calculated depth below H for LC 1 and LC2 Pile Options Section I in4 S in3 Yy W12x65 W12x72 533 597 88 97 >_ � •_ W18x86 1530 166 W18x175 3450 R:\Seattle111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\AddressReviewComments\Wall D\WaIID-SoldierPile.xls Tab:Summary Table STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BOW LAKE RECYCLING AND TRANSFER STATION SITE PREPARATION CONTRACT • Site Retaining Walls Wall E Prepared by: David Maloney EXPIRES 08/24/ Checked and Certified as to Accuracy and Completeness: LA. Balanko, P.E. l%WA GeoSciences Inc. President July 2008 Project Calculations for 54:ay fiON;.GWEST & A S SOLIATFS.INC. Page I of Jol;blo, 1°6.3 Date 11•1':iiii 7 Made by .&•=. r.-. Frrje-c i ! CactiliUenaor \ 1 : , ' s , i - .i 1 i - ;.�?+, 14.'4 T^o., i d" ->' . r...-$. x O�. ti•K s. '. 1 1 , ' I O, 1 tt':, Vans a� 1 ! [•; 1 ' t v i I t , 11 t 1 D� F...3 � r '- .. .i 1 i I ,i .1 1 • 1- �fi -*A., A— 1 - Nab• l..L •-D t , 1? 1 ; : ., '►, ?..%;_, t ..... .. s .., , L?{,. ^ tt y.� t ' /!...•K I • `'•!•fr0F�,'+,, F`r`F41� _ ' i. ':bt. k'. 1' ' 1 • tit i 4 1 r. 'ter •. 1 A1a4c.•' ; L • ii t 4144;4 • .� bQd`�J by n,� ;'5.mss►: s 1 ' i ' I t tsta� _ Q�>� ! r 1 i t ' i}; i i i y 1 1 L 1 1 t 7 i 1 I, i .14 ? • i.; - • i i l" x i` l 1 1 7 . i i J t I i i .. i 1 1 13, .....' 1• '., • v.: 5... ' 1 : is ' k.l. - 1j I •1' y ;• ' i i .A •l .? i 1; i S i , i $_.: . ... . a.. 1 1 1 :1 i t 1.> `I-. e.-A.4.C?) • -t 'i 1 1 i i • 1 I ' I $tett H 7{10 feet , Tall (4)-HZ:(m x) .. 875:88 Ibft sl Vnn 1`3DjO0 ppf "nn 1446 ,degrees. Lr @<Z= Sv (max) 2:92 :feet cit 8. i YnaNvs , '1 a5 ob' pcf La @ Z=Sv (rrmx) 0:83 feet. %ra ve 44 'degrees 1 Edea 200O() psf L = LrFLe 3.76 feet, min=0.7h aulopina nu 27:00 degrees $ir =1'.60 feet, I_I 042 feet, min=31 Ka 0.33 calculated FS (Tall, Le) 1.50 Lembedmgnt 7.00 feet WI 6370.00 Ibp 'FSovertttrrn1n9 11.73 rriln=3 X1 3.50. feet. Pa 1.Q51:03 Ibs FSsliding 6.71 min=3 Xpa 2.a3 feet Ca 13340 psf PaSIN(a) 477.1667 PxC.4S(a) 936.4924 1 Feudeo:4tatio H r 740Q. eet Niall 4 ZAK (MO) 99:0:9914/ft.. 39Q9 Tan � ees Lr@ ZSv (max) 2.92 feet Ynative.. r 135 0Q Of . Le © Z= (max) 1.2? feet Phony*, .. ' , ..... degree S °n llye 20O . psf I..= Lr+Le. 4,15 feet, min=0,7h among MI ;:: 27.;04,lregrees I $y 1•513: feet 11 0.61 feet, min=3' Kae ": t1.613 calculated , FS (Tall, Le): 1..100 m Le bedment 7.0b feet WI 6370:0a lbs FSovetturiitng 6.63 :rain=3 X• 1 .3:50 feet Pa 210210 .lbs FSel dltng 1;65 min= 3 Xpa 2.33 teat Ca 138:40 2sf PaSIN(#) 954.3334 PaCQS(a); 1472;885 Static H • • '12:00 feet Tall @ Z=H (max) 115E00 I.pslft Yen _.130:00 pcf ` 1 Vivi : 34:00 Iegrees Lr@ Z=Sv (max) 5:58 feet Pan , '00 Ynative 135:00. pcf Le. © Z=Sv (max) 0.83 feet Pnativo .• > 4640, degrees Coeurs 200:00 psf L = Lr+Le 6.42 feet, m)n=0.7h %doping en . , .27.O degrees Sir 1:50 feet L.I 0.4.2 -feet, min=3' Ka 0:33 calculated ES (Tall, Le) 1.50 Lembedment 12.00 feet W1 18720.00 lbs FSoverturning 11.73 :mine=3 X1 8.00 feet ] Pa 3088:80 lbs FSsilding 6:29 ruin=3" Xpa 4.00 feet. Ca 133.40\psf PaSIN(a) 1402286 PaCOS(a) 2752141 F.sudaoKStatIC H 12.00:10.01. Taft > Z61(. a4 ..: 1.01.84J0.s/ft you t• 0 pcf Oen �W00 degrees Lr_44 ?SvAmax) 5.58 feet es�f 0 0 psf Ynbsve 135 Ots pcf' Le @ Z 5v.(max) '1 1:;22 fe t %Mho '_ 40 degrees Cnatwe :200:00 psf L =1Lr+f:e 681 feat, min=0:7h tiskPtnq f(11 -2 00 degrees Sy : ` 1::50; fest' U 0:.0:1 feet, mi 1=3' Kae ::.-: 0.66 calculated. FS (Taff, Le). 1.10. Lembedment 12.00 feet W1 18720.00 lbs FSovei3uming .6:63 min=3 X1 6.00 feet Pa 6177,60 Ibs FSsliding 136 min=a Xpa 4.00 feet CO 1330 Al paSIN(a) .2004.512 PaCOSta) '5604.282 Stab ' 1740 feet: Tail .@ ZON (n1'a)t) 16493 93 itis/t't Ymt ,..1004$011.0 1 Vol 3,444 degrees Lr©,ZSv (max) 8:24 feet cm ; .;COO psf Ynative . . 13.00 paf Le @:Z=Sv (max) 0:83 feet nethie 'OM .degrees Chatty° .• 200o psf l Lr+Le 9,08 feet min=0.7h aelopmgf+a •27:00 degrees Sv . 1..80 feet LI 0.42 feet; min=3' Ka 0:33 calculated FS (Tail, Le) 1.50 Lembedinent .. 1,7:00 feet W1 37570:00 lbs FS4verturning 11.73 min=3 X1 8.50 feet Pa 6199.05 lbs FSsliding 6:12 min=a Xpa 5.$7 feet. Ca 133.40 psf PaSIN(a) 2814.31 PaCOS(a) 5523:394 Psudeo Static H. y 22 0O feet TAO 9Z=H:ftFlax) 341454 tkstft ,Vim 4100Po I Tim . 34. . degrees Lr_@ Z=Sv. (reale) 10:90 Petit cmi Q OQ P J llnat 'nom pcf Le @ Sv (maxj 1:,22 to (Pnativa 44 degree. sn ;'220000 psf L A. Lr+Le 12;12 feet; mtn=0.7h_ asloping mt - 27L 0G ie*rees Sv Ill feet LI 0.61 feet; rriih43' Kae . (46 calculated FS (Fall, Le) 1.10 I -embedment :22.0 ' feet WI 6204.(X) this FSbverturn ng 6.63 m(n=3 Xi 1.1,0(1 feet Pa 20763.60 lbs FSsiidIng 3:21 ruin=3 Xpa 7.35 feet `Ca. 133.40 pd PaSINtal 5420.477 PaOOS(a.) 18500-.4 April 29, 2008 HWA Project No. 2008-003-21 slope stability analysis was performed at the proposed highest wall face, which is approximately 17 feet at soldier pile C37. Our slope stability analysis was based on Cross-section 7-7', whose location is as shown on Figure 2B. Subsurface information for the analysis was obtained from HWA exploratory borings B-230 and B-236 conducted in February and March 2007. In our slope stability analyses, the same material properties as for the northern slopes in Section 4.3.1. were assumed for the burn fill and the new fill. The new fill will be placed to support the proposed perimeter road. For the underlying glacial deposits, we assumed: unit weight = 135 pcf, internal friction angle 4) = 36 degrees and c = 0 psf. These parameters are considered conservative values, which were also utilized in earth pressure computations for the cantilever -soldier pile wall (See Figure 5C, in HWA's Revised Draft Geotechnical report dated November 29, 2007). Our exploratory borings did not encounter ground water during drilling. However, potential wet season slope stability conditions were assumed so that conservatism dictates the analyses. Results are summarized in Table 7. Computer printouts are provided in Figures 4I and 4J. Table 7: Summary of Northeastern Slope Stability Analyses Slope Location Static Factor of Seismic Factor Figure Numbers Safety (FS) of Safety (FS) Profile 7-7' 1.49 1.11 Figures 4I and 4J Our slope stability calculations indicate that the proposed slope/wall design meets the criteria outlined in the City's requirements. We recommend the soldier piles should be embedded a minimum of 12.5 feet into very dense glacial deposits to ensure the stability conditions (factors of safety) calculated. 4.4 WALL E DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION As indicated previously, in order to facilitate the increased fill heights on the east and south refuse slopes, mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls are proposed to ensure global and local stability. Current (90%) plans indicate the wall will range up to 20 feet tall. To check on stability of various wall heights, we analyzed four typical wall sections with exposed heights of 5, 10, 15, and 20 feet above proposed finished grade. Our analyses followed the procedures outlined by FHWA-NHI-00-043, Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design & Construction Guidelines. We looked at the internal and external stability in both the static and pseudo -static case, with the pseudo -static case corresponding to a 0.32g PGA seismic event. Tables 8 and 9 2003-008 Slope Stability Wall E.doc 12 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. April 29, 2008 HWA Project No. 2008-003-21 outline the soil and design properties used for our wall calculations. We used an intemal factor of safety of 1.5 and 1.1 for static and pseudo -static design conditions, respectively. We also used an external factor of safety of 3.0 against overturning, sliding and bearing capacity. Lastly, global slope stability of the wall system was analyzed using the SLIDE slope stability analysis program based on profile 1-1' (see location on Figure 2A). Our global stability analyses resulted in minimum factors of safety FS = 1.92 and 1.38 for static and seismic loading cases, respectively. Computer printouts of global slope stability analyses are presented in Figures 5A and 5B. Table 8: Soil Properties (External Stability) Material Type Unit Weight (pcf) tp (degrees) C (psf) Structural Fill Glacial Deposits 130 135 34 40 100 200 Table 9: Wall Design Properties (Internal Stability) Material Type Allowable Bearing Active- Active -plus- Passive - Capacity (psf) EFP* Seismic-EFP (pcf) EFP** (pcf) (pcf) Structural Fill 3000 43 86 250 Glacial Deposits 4000 30 41 300 Note: * EFP — equivalent fluid pressure design methodology. ** Upper two feet should be neglected in passive earth pressure calculations. The recommended wall consists of a wrapped -face, geogrid-reinforced, section with a shotcrete facing. Figure 6 shows a typical cross-section of our recommended design and provides key notes for its construction. Figure 7 provides a sketch of the slope benching recommended to be performed to receive the various lifts of fill soil, commencing from the wall and working up slope. A County representative should be onsite to provide full-time monitoring of the wall construction. This will ensure that the design criteria are being met, and to provide the ability to identify potential issues for the design team in the event that unexpected subsurface conditions are encountered. Construction of the fill wall should proceed in accordance with the following guidelines: • Prepare wall site by removing all deleterious materials within the wall base limits, equivalent to the wall height, to expose medium dense soils and by excavating a keyway, level front to back, to a minimum of 2 feet into native non-organic soil. 2003-008 Slope Stability Wall E.doc 13 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. April 29, 2008 HWA Project No. 2008-003-21 The exposed foundation subgrade should then be compacted and evaluated by the geotechnical engineer. Any yielding material should be removed and replaced with compacted structural fill or crushed rock pad. • Directly behind the first lift of material, a 4 -inch slotted pipe shall be installed to provide adequate drainage of the backfill. • The geogrid should be placed on a 1.5 -foot maximum vertical spacing. Geogrid that is suitable for wall construction should be listed on the WSDOT Qualified Products List (QPL). Table 10 provides height, width, and geogrid property recommendations. Table 10: Design Recommendations for Different Wall Heights Wall Face Height Width Tail (ft) * (ft) (ft) (lbs/ft) Geogrid Recommendations** 5 7 7 1000 Miragrid 3XT, Tensar UX100MSE 10 12 12 1700 Miragrid 8XT, Mirifi HS 1150 Mirifi HS 1400, Tensar 15 17 17 2400 UX1500MSE Miragrid 18XT, Tensar 20 22 22 3200 UX1600MSE * Note: Height includes two -foot deep key. ** Note: Found in WSDOT Qualified Products List, Appendix D • The geogrid must be placed with the strong axis oriented perpendicular to the wall face. A 6 -inch overlap should be achieved for adjacent lengths of geogrid. • A minimum tail or return length of 3 feet should be achieved for each layer of geogrid. • A 4 -foot section of non -woven geotextile shall be placed in the wrap section to ensure material is not lost through the openings of geogrid. A low -strength, non -woven, soil separation grade geotextile may be used for this purpose. • Backfill should consist of a 4 -inch minus gravel with 100% passing 4" -square; 75-100% passing 2" -square; 50-80% passing No. 4 Sieve; 30% max passing No. 40 Sieve; and no more than 7% fines content. • The backfill should be placed in loose lifts not to exceed 8 inches and must be compacted to 95% of Modified Proctor; Test Method ASTM D-1557. 2003-008 Slope Stability Wall E.doc 14 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. April 29, 2008 HWA Project No. 2008-003-21 • Care should be taken in order to properly compact the wrapped section. • The MSE wall shall be constructed with a batter of at least 6V:1H. • L-shaped pieces of #5 rebar measuring 6 -inches by 36 -inches shall be inserted into the wall on a 3 -foot by 3 -foot staggered grid pattern, from which welded wire mesh will be attached. The rebar shall be constructed in place (i.e. it should be laid upon the geogrid and covered with compacted backfill), with the 6 inch bent section protruding 2 inches from the face of the wall for hanging wire mesh. Driving the rebar into place after construction shall not be permitted to prevent t potential damage to the geogrid. UV`,,1,1 • A 4 inch thick cover of shotcrete shall be applied to the wall to ensure adequate • {�'' protection of the geogrid. Along the top of the wall, a curb shall be constructed in the plastic shotcrete to direct the flow of runoff top a suitable discharge location or conduit. • Weep holes shall be installed along the base of the shotcrete face every 5 feet to ensure there is no build up of water behind the facing. This may be performed by insertion of a PVC or ABS pipe segment through the wire mesh and in contact with the geogrid reinforcement, prior to shotcreting. The exterior opening should be temporarily covered with plastic sheeting that may be subsequently removed to prevent clogging of the weep hole with shotcrete. 4.5 FILL SOIL HANDLING AND DISPOSAL 4.5.1 Construction Issues Construction bid documents (plans and specifications) should include all analytical results and provisions for contaminated soil and waste handling, treatment/disposal, and health and safety requirements. During soils excavation and handling, soils, including drill cuttings, should be field screened and observed for significant staining or odors. Prior to export, stockpiled soils should be sampled for characterization and handling, as required by the disposal facility. If excavated materials are disposed off-site (e.g., not at Cedar Hills Regional Landfill), property owners at the receiving site should be notified of the results of this study and any additional testing information available at that time. Criteria for unrestricted use of soils may be lower than some cleanup levels. Soils with contaminant concentrations above detection limits, but below cleanup levels, should not be used as fill near surface or ground water. 2003-008 Slope Stability Wall E.doc 15 HWA GEOSCIENCES INC. It'\\I III: [ I\ COMP. I2 -w"— CHK. REV. DATE 6-t -0'8 DATE DATE PROJEC FILE NO PAGE OF PAGES 0'o-t,ac, piaci"( yr 3 (% `4 s� o4t..' %t Sb l4 aiL L.414,rk (.off S\ x 0.4 1. oche cM„A#41.4.w,f s- (11. (f, 1.411/14.. ► w�- p f soy = lA x 13 a = 1 uc7 16 t(4' = G141— c— ,-acct = 1.0 t o t.t =• 9 x 378 x Z. :lam L nv° >r b n k) 3i Bow Lake Project Wall E Wall Face Dowel Embedment Soil Unit Wt 130 pcf Coeff Friction 1 Bar Dia 0.625 in EQ Toad per Dowel 180 Ib Factor of Safety 2 �(: Depth of cover Soil Soil Friction Req'd With Pressure Pressure per inch Embedmer FS (ft) (psf) (psi) (in) (in) 3 390 2.7 3.4 53 106 4 520 3.6 4.5 40 80 5 650 4.5 5.6 32 64 6 780 5.4 6.8 27 53 7 910 6.3 7.9 23 46 8 1040 7.2 9.0 20 40 9 1170 8.1 10.2 18 35 10 1300 9.0 11.3 16 32 12 1560 10.8 13.5 13 27 14 1820 12.6 15.8 11 23 16 2080 14.4 18.1 10 20 IMP Ed at "• Ii tk'III [ I\ COMP. ra' CHK. REV. DATE 6'1-0 N DATE DATE PROJECT 130 K/ LIJC(., FILE NO PAGE OF PAGE SSW `^44') 3tx 3' ar-otio, P � S.t wwwc (.o AA- - O. 'It, 1 (S'o 1/S041.) ? o 14i1+1 _ M- - 20 3�2 - Z 2 s t' `bs C Rilat 4 2Z', S jcuw 1 d, 00-1-b A",_;, A. 4-.-r„ = O, oot 0C (f)l2 o. 08€ V(41 - TABLE 1 - COMMON STOCK STYLES OF WELDED WIRE FABRIC Style Designation Spac ng Of Wires, in. Diameter Of Wires, in. Sectional Area, sq. in. per ft. `` Weight lbs. per 100 sq. ft. Old Designation (By Steel Wire Gage) New Designation (By W -Number) Longit. Transv. Longit. Transv. Longit. TransJ. 6x6 -10x10 6x6 6x6-W1.4xW1.4 6 6 .135 t .135 .029 .029 21 -8x8. 6x6 -W2.1 xW2.1 6 6 .162 - .162 .041 .041 30 6x6 -6x6 6x6-W2.9xW2.9 6 6 .192 .192 .058 .058 42 6x6 -4x4 6x6-W4xW4 6 6 .225 .225 .080 .080 58 4x4 -10x10 4x4-W1.4xW1.4 4 4 .135 .135 .043 .043 31 4x4 -8x8 4x4 4x4-1V2y 1 xW2.1 4 4 .162 .162 06 . ' 62 44 -6x6 -W 4 4 .192 '.192 ..87' • .08 62 4x4 -4x4 `4x12 4x4-W4xW4 4 4 .225 .225 . 0 .120 85 --8x12 `4x 4x12-W2.1xWO.9 4 12 .162 .1055 .062 .009 25 12-7x 11 4x 12-W2.5xW 1.1 4 12 .177 .1205 .074 .011 31 ric with wires smaller than size W1.4 Is manufactured from galvanized wire. RWB SD 31 fiRK F COMP. UtiG- CHK. 12-44L REV. DATE 8-1 de DATE 5 - Li -os DATE PROJECT B DLJ 3..4e- FILE .%FILE NO. PAGE 1 OF 9. PAGES 4JALL F - ELEA: .t(.A- . 'E tW Pr,ENT • Fo2 Ets.c 1 GEi4TOZ-) L- At 4SSuMG 2' VE1Nct.E jlig-cet.446-Cf • Folz Nis C...tt.Gv(-4 t 40K. SLA et iv(- LA_ • $Lo PE = 1,15H: E v 5v (e+CO) e 4- l_j 2 j 5 -me S W► i a-1_0 e= 90 =36 =20 Ka - Stv'2 (9ot36) ;.r,2(90)s 3C, (51:,,,- --20) Irr Svy i 9 o in00+-10) S 0,33 K6. -)S = (Is (v. 33) = eG f • DA -0 cAr -S LCI — (bto iluiCriorJ LG2 — SEISMIC, 1 -AA z_�S 5= 20.o �0. )1-bn &ktv;A -s►,34, eat -6 ►+- sem. 34 Z303,$): 3S pet tN on.'" GASES) Ikkird-E PASStvE . • STA -Edo -FY cREc.lz 5a— PCr- al Fort STA 6it- r( Q6JuLT4 • AO 4. Foonorr p> 1C -r4 — See PO 6,9 p5,2 rt 9 King County SWMD BLPTF Retaining Wall Stability Analysis Wall: North Equipment Wall Wall Geometry Soil Properties Vertical Loads (Ewv w'u-) Top Wall El Bottom Footing El Top of Surcharge El H HEEL STEM TOE BASE THICK WCONC SUW FA EFWA S SURCH Ex FC Wstem Wbase Wsoil 279.4 268.7 279.4 9.4 5 1.00 1.5 7.50 ft Boxed cells require input Road A curb elevation Height of soil over footing ft Heel length ft Stem thickness ft Toe length Total base length ft Base thickness Pcf 1.33 150 135 36 35 6.5 2 0.41 0.45 pcf Soil unit weight degrees Friction angle pcf Equivalent fluid weight, active H Seismic factor (uniform load, full height) ft Traffic surcharge (equivalent soil depth) Seismic coefficient sliding friction coefficient (no FS) 1404 lb/ft 1496 Ib/ft 6318 Ib/ft STEM*(H+HPLUS)*WCONC BASE*THICK*WCONC HEEL*H*SUW Horizontal Loads Pa 2000 Ib/ft EFWA*(H+THICK)A2/2 Ea 743 Ib/ft S*(H+THICK)^2 Exstem 576 Ib/ft Ex*Wstem Exbase 613 Ib/ft Ex*Wbase Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) Resultant Allowable Load Case FS Sliding Location Bearing FS -Normal 1.5 mid 1/3 4000 psf FS -Unusual 1.33 mid 1/2 4000 psf FS -EQ 1.1 within base 5300 psf Results Summary H= 9.36 Max Min Resultant in Resultant in Load Case Bearing Bearing Mid 113? Mid 1/2? FS Sliding 1 -Construction 1836 623 Yes Yes 1.51 2 -Seismic 1994 464 Yes Yes 1.24 R:\Seattlel11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations1Retaining WallslEquipmentWall-North.xls Page 1 of 2 Stability Analysis Construction, LC 1 H= 9.36 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 1404 2.00 2808 Wbase D 1 1496 3.75 5611 Wsoil D 1 6318 5.00 31590 Psurch H 1 -748 5.35 -4000 Pa H 1 -2000 3.56 -7126 Totals 9218 -2748 28883 a 3.13 (MN) e 0.62 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 1.25 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.88 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, a1.2 1836 623 sliding 1.51 Seismic, LC 2 H= 9.36 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 1404 2.00 2808 Wbase D 1 1496 3.75 5611 Wsoil D 1 6318 5.00 31590 Pa H 1 -2000 3.56 -7126 Ea E 0.7 -520 5.35 -2779 Ex, stem E 0.7 -403 6.01 -2422 Ex, base E 0.7 -429 0.67 -286 Totals 9218 -3352 27396 a 2.97 (MN) e 0.78 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 1.25 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.88 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, U1.2 1994 464 sliding 1.24 R:1Seattie111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\EquipmentWall-North.xls Page 2 of 2 King County SWMD BLPTF Retaining Wall Stability Analysis Wall: North Equipment Wall Wall Geometry s' WAU-S Soil Properties Vertical Loads Top Wall El Bottom Footing El Top of Surcharge El 275.4 268.7 275.4 Boxed cells require input Road A curb elevation H 5.4 Height of soil over footing HEEL 3.5 ft Heel length STEM 1.00 ft Stem thickness TOE 1.5 ft Toe length BASE 6.00 ft Total base length THICK 1.33 ft Base thickness WCONC 150 pcf SUW FA EFWA S SURCH Ex FC Wstem Wbase Wsoil 135 36 44.6 6.5 0 0.41 0.45 pcf Soil unit weight degrees Friction angle pcf Equivalent fluid weight, active H Seismic factor (uniform Toad, full height) ft Traffic surcharge (equivalent soil depth) Seismic coefficient sliding friction coefficient (no FS) 814 Ib/ft 1197 Ib/ft 2566 lb/ft STEM*(H+HPLUS)*WCONC BASE*THICK*WCONC HEEL*H*SUW Horizontal Loads Pa 1019 Ib/ft EFWA*(H+THICK)^2/2 Ea 297 lb/ft S*(H+THICK)^2 Exstem 334 Ib/ft Ex*Wstem Exbase 491 lb/ft Ex*Wbase Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) Resultant Allowable Load Case FS Sliding Location Bearing FS -Normal 1.5 mid 1/3 4000 psf FS -Unusual 1.33 mid 1/2 4000 psf FS -EQ 1.1 within base 5300 psf Results Summary H= 5.43 Max Min Resultant in Resultant in Load Case Bearing Bearing Mid 1/3? Mid 1/2? FS Sliding 1 -Construction 747 779 Yes Yes 2.02 2 -Seismic 1060 466 Yes Yes 1.14 R:1Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnalyticallCalculations\Retaining Wals\EquipmentWall-North.xls Page 1 of 2 e C 1,9 Stability Analysis Construction, LC 1 H= 5.43 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 814 2.00 1629 Wbase D 1 1197 3.00 3591 Wsoil D 1 2566 4.25 10904 Psurch H 1 0 3.38 0 Pa H 1 -1019 2.25 -2296 Totals 4577 -1019 13828 a 3.02 (MN) e -0.02 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 1.00 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.50 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, 01,2 747 779 sliding 2.02 Seismic, LC 2 H= 5.43 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 814 2.00 1629 Wbase D 1 1197 3.00 3591 Wsoil D 1 2566 4.25 10904 Pa H 1 -1019 2.25 -2296 Ea E 0.7 -208 3.38 -703 Ex, stem E 0.7 -234 4.05 -946 Ex, base E 0.7 -344 0.67 -228 Totals 4577 -1804 11951 a 2.61 (MN) e 0.39 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 1.00 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.50 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, 01,2 1060 466 sliding 1.14 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\EquipmentWall-North.xls Page 2 of 2 King County SWMD BLPTF Retaining Wall Stability Analysis Wall: North Equipment Wall (SiDF tUS) Wali Geometry Soil Properties Vertical Loads Top Wall El Bottom Footing El Top of Surcharge El H HEEL STEM TOE BASE THICK WCONC SUW FA EFWA S SURCH Ex FC 271.9 268.7 271.9 1.9 1.5 1.00 1.5 Boxed cells require input Road A curb elevation Height of soil over footing ft Heel length ft Stem thickness ft Toe length Total base length ft Base thickness pcf 4.00 ft 1.33 150 135 36 44.6 6.5 2 0.41 0.45 pcf Soil unit weight degrees Friction angle pcf Equivalent fluid weight, active H Seismic factor (uniform Toad, full height) ft Traffic surcharge (equivalent soil depth) Seismic coefficient sliding friction coefficient (no FS) Wstem 285 lb/ft STEM*(H+HPLUS)*WCONC Wbase 798 Ib/ft BASE*THICK*WCONC Wsoil 385 Ib/ft HEEL*H*SUW Horizontal Loads Pa 233 Ib/ft EFWA*(H+THICK)^2/2 Ea 68 Ib/ft S*(H+THICK)^2 Exstem 117 Ib/ft Ex*Wstem Exbase 327 Ib/ft Ex*Wbase Stability Factors of Safety (allowable bearing per Geotech report Table 6) Resultant Allowable Load Case FS Sliding Location Bearing FS -Normal 1.5 mid 1/3 4000 psf FS -Unusual 1.33 mid 1/2 4000 psf FS -EQ 1.1 within base 5300 psf Results Summary H= 1.9 Max Min Resultant In Resultant in Load Case Bearing Bearing Mid 1/3? Mid 1/2? FS Sliding 1 -Construction 281 453 Yes Yes 2.84 2 -Seismic 436 298 Yes Yes 1.12 R:1Seattie111-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and AnalyticaRCaiculations\Retaining WaIlslEquipmentWall-North.xls Page 1 of 2 Stability Analysis Construction, LC 1 H= 1.9 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (lb/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 285 2.00 570 Wbase D 1 798 2.00 1596 Wsoil D 1 385 3.25 1250 Pa H 1 -233 1.08 -250 Totals 1468 -233 3166 a 2.16 (MN) e -0.16 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 0.67 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.00 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, 01.2 281 453 sliding 2.84 Seismic, LC 2 H= 1.9 Moment Load Arm about A Load Category Factor Vert (Ib/ft) Horz (Ib/ft) (ft) (ft -Ib) Wstem D 1 285 2.00 570 Wbase D 1 798 2.00 1596 Wsoil D 1 385 3.25 1250 Pa H 1 -233 1.08 -250 Ea E 0.7 -47 1.61 -77 Ex, stem E 0.7 -82 2.28 -186 Ex, base E 0.7 -229 0.67 -152 Totals 1468 -591 2750 a 1.87 (MN) e 0.13 (BASE/2-a) middle 1/3 0.67 (BASE/6) middle 1/2 1.00 (BASE/4) resultant in mid 1/3? Yes resultant in mid 1/2? Yes within base? Yes bearing, 01,2 436 298 sliding 1.12 R:\Seattle\11-00839-20000 Bow Lake TRS Expansion Project\Data and Analytical\Calculations\Retaining Walls\EquipmentWall-North.xls Page 2 of 2 awe SO 31 n w tiro( WPaA-- F — vx p€t T )fr U COMP. (44tr CHK. REV. DATE 6-1'08 DATE DATE PROJECT FILE NO PAGE &ow LA -cc cm- PSP OF 9 PAGES SMNA pESAG-N EL 219.4 ES+ 210 \\ Mu = [IC( 9.4)1Ib tc,.s (Io.1 �)(9.c1� 516 (9.L 6 2 2 = 13 S kr Pi" " (SE st-tic,) coNrRou Ivlu = 1-35- (9_1)31- 20300 4 )Z ] 1.L = /2.7 w- F+ 1k1o(OA Att• 1Su ,.j) L 6 2 - As AS = 13,5 0.36 �..� 116 o'J It ,(d GaAs t . Sfd hooks , 6 As; -0, 0033 (t1) 1 -) z 0.4V (v.1" 0,0011 (I1)(9.S) = 0.21 int Ash;., Ea (a- 1.3 3' .rt. c Shama.. n = 0 :IS (1.: if1W (IZ)(9. ) �0611( (6 Vv = [35(9.4)1- 4- (o.s(ro.'13) (9.`I) + 536 IA) 29-�4S I` < lot 1H iS -- oma. BASE VES(G-N FL (1t*' {.4D (W SDuJ fi W c.sn�) [i�il3)4 9.4 035)1 ,9 = Zoc6 Ib J = WA = lo(s) = 10279 Zo%6 (s) = 2516'0 2 .ijJJJJJJ 3 !� JJ J J J 1 1 J CoMvvAtt(rc,, 5' daeor.E Mtn' I11 -•=2S 0.41 t( IZ ) RWB ED31 COMP. lAr CHK. REV. DATE 8-1-08 DATE DATE PROJECT RM.) c,4r- SIm rail FILE NO PAGE 9 OF 9 PAGES aME 1CS1fN 116 (bo+(v l-1 bti.$) L 4 O ASSME un4uo UM (f.- IB90 M = it3,r.S )2 20,6 4-f-1 MV = 24 , o,03d 4;1 eft' 13,5) As SmaSt vSk. Asr Lic.9 # Sz 12 Ew i tf4 TUE. T�� Jim Haggerton, Mayor ep.• rtment of Community Development Jack Pace, Director February 18, 2010 Tom Creegan King County Solid Waste Division 201 S Jackson St, Ste 701 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Request for Extension #2 Development Permit No D08-389 Bowlake Transfer Retaining Walls Dear Mr. Creegan, This letter is in response to your written request for an extension to Permit Number D08-389. The Building Official has reviewed your letter and considered your request to extend the above referenced permit. The City of Tukwila Building Division will be extending your permit an additional 180 days from the date of expiration, through August 30, 2010. If you should have any questions, please contact our office at (206) 431-3670. Sincerely, /AU enn shall cian File: Permit No. D08-389 W:\Pennit Center\Extension LettersTermits\2008\D08-389 Permit Extension #2.doc jem 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 o Fax: 206-431-3665 i Page 1 of 1 Bill Rambo - Bow Lake From: "Creegan, Tom" To: "Bill Rambo" Date: 02/11/2010 4:07 PM Subject: Bow Lake CC: "Jennifer Marshall" Hi Bill, thank you for providing reminder that our permit, D08-389, for construction of retaining walls at the Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station is due to expire on 3/2/2010. Construction is ongoing on the the building elements permitted under D08-389. Inspections have been requested per the permit conditions, and inspections were conducted by Mr. James Dunaway. The most recent inspection point for the permit was for placement of concrete for Wall B on 9/3/09. During the next three months we anticipate placement of cast in place concrete as well as placement of gunite (shotcrete) wall facings; these are inspection points for this permit, and when these activities are specifically scheduled, we will again call for inspection by the City of Tukwila. As construction will continue beyond 3/2/2010, we request an extension for this permit (#D08-389). Thank you for your assistance. Tom Creegan Engineer III King County Solid Waste Division (206) 263-6476 .0664 cl4olio lffe ozAkfrip RECEIVED FEB 112010 PERMIT CENTER file ://C:\temp\XPGrpWise\4B742B5Etuk-mail6300-po 1001367538135251 \GW} 00001.H... 02/11/2010 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director TOM CREEGAN 201 S JACKSON ST SUITE 701 SEATTLE WA 98104 RE: Permit No. D08-389 18800 ORILLIA RD S TUKW Dear Permit Holder: In reviewing our current records, the above noted permit has not received a final inspection by the City of Tukwila Building Division. Per the International Building Code, International Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code and/or the National Electric Code, every permit issued by the Building Division under the provisions of these codes shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit has not begun within 180 days from the issuance date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work has begun for a period of 180 days. Your permit will expire on 03/02/2010. Based on the above, you are hereby advised to: 1) Call the City of Tukwila Inspection Request Line at 206-431-2451 to schedule for the next or final inspection. Each inspection creates a new 180 day period. -or- 2) Submit a written request for permit extension to the Permit Center at least seven (7) days before it is due to expire. Address your extension request to the Building Official and state your reason(s) for the need to extend your permit. The Building Code does allow the Building Official to approve one extension of up to 180 days. If it is determined that your extension request is granted, you will be notified by mail. In the event you do not call for an inspection and/or receive an extension prior to 03/02/2010, your permit will become null and void and any further work on the project will require a new permit and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Bill Rambo Permit Technician File: Permit File No. D08-389 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 0 Fax: 206-431-3665 06-03-2009 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development TOM CREEGAN 201 S JACKSON ST SUITE 701 SEATTLE WA 98104 RE: Permit No. D08-389 18800 ORILLIA RD S TUKW Dear Permit Holder: Jack Pace, Director In reviewing our current records the above noted permit has not received a final inspection by the City of Tukwila Building Division. Per the International Building Code and/or the International Mechanical Code, every permit issued by the Building Division under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit, or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days. Based on the above, you are hereby advised to: Call the City of Tukwila Inspection Request Line at 206-431-2451 to schedule for the next or final inspection. This inspection is intended to determine if substantial work has been accomplished since issuance of the permit or last inspection; or if the project should be considered abandoned. If such determination is made, the Building Code does allow the Building Official to approve one or more extensions of time for additional periods not exceeding 90 days each. Extension requests must be in writing and provide satisfactory reasons why circumstances beyond the applicants control have prevented action from being taken. In the event you do not call for the above inspection and receive an extension prior to 07/26/2009 , your permit will become null and void and any further work on the project will require a new permit and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Bill Rambo Permit Technician xc: Permit File No. D08-389 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 July 20, 2009 City of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Tom Creegan King County Solid Waste Division 201 S Jackson St, Ste 701 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: Request for Extension Development Permit No D08-389 Bowlake Transfer Retaining Walls Dear Mr. Creegan, This letter is in response to your written request for an extension to Permit Number D08-389. The Building Official has reviewed your letter and considered your request to extend the above referenced permit. The City of Tukwila Building Division will be extending your permit an additional 180 days from the date of expiration, through January 22, 2010. If you should have any questions, please contact our office at (206) 431-3670. ifer Marshall iit Technician File: Permit No. D08-389 W:\Permit Center\Extension Letters \Permits\2008\D08-389 Permit Extension.doc jem 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 o Tukwila, Washington 98188 a Phone: 206-431-3670 o Fax: 206-431-3665 Page 1 of 1 Bob Benedicto - Bow Lake building permit D08-389 From: "Creegan, Tom" To: "Bob Benedicto" Date: 07/17/2009 10:06 AM Subject: Bow Lake building permit D08-389 Mr. Benedicto, per instructions from your office, I am writing to request extension of active building permit #D08-389, issued 1/27/09 for construction of retaining walls at the Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station. This work is ongoing, has not at any time been abandoned, and is anticipated to continue for another six months at least. Thank you, Tom Creegan Engineer III King County Solid Waste Division (206) 263-6476 n k. ,k .,Aeeti /60 dar , 07- /7- Z'O7 6te 0-1- Ziloi aIlZZko 12-03-2008 • Cily ..f Tukwe Jim Haggerton, Mayor epartment of Community Development Jack Pace, Director TOM CREEGAN 201 S JACKSON ST SUITE 701 SEATTLE WA 98104 RE: Permit Application No. D08-389 18800 ORILLIA RD S TUKW Dear Permit Applicant: In reviewing our current permit application files, it appears that your permit application applied for on 08/04/2008 , has not been issued by the City of Tukwila Permit Center. Per the International Building Code and/or the International Mechanical Code, every permit application not issued within 180 days from the date of application shall expire by limitation and become null and void. Your permit application expires on 01/31/2009 . If you choose to pursue your project, a written request for extension of your application addressed to the Building Official, demonstrating justifiable cause, will need to be received at the Permit Center prior to your expiration date of 01/31/2009. If it is determined that an extension is granted, your application will be extended for an additional 90 days from the expiration date. In the event we do not receive your written request for extension, your permit application will become null and void and your project will require a new permit application, plans and specifications, and associated fees. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, N.4(kU, fer Marshall t Technician xc: Permit File No. D08-389 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 PERMIT COORD COPY PLAN REVIEW/ROUTING SLIP ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-389 DATE: 08-4-08 PROJECT NAME: BOW LAKE RECYCLING AND TRANSFER SITE ADDRESS: 18800 ORILLILA RD S X Original Pian Submittal Response to Correction Letter # Response to Incomplete Letter #_ Revision # After Permit Issued DEPARTMENTS: Buff�' /�ding Division uv, c Wor S i, 4 -I Fir61'PrMention tit Structural 10,1_0 i5 rfPlaning' Division Permit Coordinator DETERMINAT ON OF COMPLETENESS: (Tues., Thurs.) Complete Incomplete DUE DATE: 08-7-08 Not Applicable ❑ Comments: Permit Center Use Only . INCOMPLETE LETTER MAILED: LETTER OF COMPLETENESS MAILED: Departments determined incomplete: Bldg 0 Fire 0 Ping ❑ PW 0 Staff Initials: TUESITHURS ROU7ING: Please Route Structural Review Required REVIEWER'S INITIALS: No further Review Required DATE: n APPROVALS OR CORRECTIONS: Approved Approved with Conditions E Not Approved (attach comments) n DUE DATE: 09-4-08 Notation: REVIEWER'S INITIALS: DATE: Permit Center Use Only . CORRECTION LETTER MAILED: Departments issued corrections: Bldg 0 Fire 0 Ping 0 PW 0 Staff Initials: Documents/routing slip.doc 2-28-02 October 14, 2008 Bob Benedicto Building Official City of Tukwila 6300 Southcenter Boulevard Suite 100 Tukwila, Washington 98188 Dear Mr. Benedicto: RECENED CITY OF TUKWILA OCT 112001 }'ERMIT CENTER Project: D08-389 Bow Lake Transfer Station SDC: D We have completed our structural review of the retaining walls for the Bow Lake Transfer Station. The plans are in substantial compliance with the 2006 International Building Code. The plans are approved and are being returned with our indication of review on them GENERAL 1. The Geotech Report indicates that the report was based on the requirements of the 2003 International Building Code. Based on my review of the 2006 International Building Code there are not significant changes that would affect the project. However, you should obtain a letter from the Geotech Engineer indicating that the Geotech Report complies with the requirements of the 2006 International Building Code. 2. Details are provided in the Geotech Report for a mechanically stabilized retaining wall at the trailer parking area (Figures 5D, 5E, 5G). No details are provided on the plans. This area appears to require either the removal of the refuse and addition of structural fill or the addition of Geopiers beneath the parking area. If this is intended to be part of the submittal than details should be provided separately. 3. I have added Sheet S420 — Retaining Wall F to the Drawing Index. 4. I have added a list of Special Inspections required for the concrete and soldier pile construction. SOUND INSPECTIONS & INVESTIGATIVE ENGINEERS, LLC PMB 223, 1802 "A" Street SE Auburn, WA 89002 (206) 621-1686 • (253) 939-4988 fax October 2, 2008 i Ciz of Tukwila Jim Haggerton, Mayor Department of Community Development Jack Pace, Director Frank Mellas Sound Inspections and Investigative Engineers LLC PMB 223 1802 'A' Street SE Auburn, WA 98002 RE: Structural Review Bow Lake Transfer Station — D08-389 18800 Orillia Road S, Tukwila Dear Mr. Mellas: Please review the enclosed plans and documents for structural compliance with the 2006 International Building Code. Upon completion of the plan review, please return 2 sets of approved/stamped structural plans and documents to the City for issuance and ensure that the special inspections required for this project are listed on the approved plans. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (206)431-3672. Sincerely, 414144 Brenda Holt, Permit Coordinator encl xc: Permit File No. D08-389 H:1Documents\Structural Consultant\D08-389 - structural review.DOC Page 1 of 1 bh 6300 Southcenter Boulevard, Suite #100 • Tukwila, Washington 98188 • Phone: 206-431-3670 • Fax: 206-431-3665 Untitled Page • • General/Specialty Contractor A business registered as a construction contractor with L6tI to perform construction work within the scope of its specialty. A General or Specialty construction Contractor must maintain a surety bond or assignment of account and carry general liability insurance. Business and Licensing Information Name Phone Address Suite/Apt. City State Zip County Business Type Parent Company GARY MERLINO CONST CO INC 2067629125 9125 10TH AVE S SEATTLE WA 98108 KING CORPORATION UBI No. Status License No. License Type Effective Date Expiration Date Suspend Date Previous License Next License Associated License Specialty 1 Specialty 2 600584952 ACTIVE GARYMCC 150MW CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR 7/16/1985 2/14/2009 MERLIGM330KA ANMAR**157N2 GENERAL UNUSED Business Owner Information Name Role Effective Date Expiration Date MERLINO, GARY Cancel Date 01/01/1980 Bond Amount WESTEREN, ANITA 3 01/01/1980 103636811 MERLINO, DONALD Until Cancelled 01/01/1980 Bond Information Bond Bond Company Name Bond Account Number Effective Date Expiration Date Cancel Date Impaired Date Bond Amount Received Date 3 TRAVELERS CAS Et SURETY CO 103636811 12/31/2001 Until Cancelled $12,000.0002/14/2002 2 TRAVELERS CASE SURETY CO 103636811 07/01/2001 12/31/2001 $6,000.00 06/04/2001 1 UNITED PACIFIC INS CO U543193 07/01/1985 Until Cancelled 06/11/2001 $6,000.00 Insurance Information Page 1 of 2 Insurance Company Name Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date Cancel Date Impaired Date Amount Received Date 21 ZURICH AMERICAN INS CO GL0379063302 01/31/200601/31/2009 $1,000,000.0001/30/2008 20 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS OF PA GL7043147 01/31/2005 01/31/2006 $1,000,000.0001 /25/2005 19 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS CO OF® ®9333039 01/31/200401/31/2005 $1,000,000.0001/30/2004 https://fortress.wa.gov/lni/bbip/Detail.aspx?License=GARYMCC 150MW 01/27/2009 King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 165 Date: 3-19-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 DOS - 389 �ow }-'&- Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 City of Tukwila Permit Number: DO8-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E0+60.07 to approximately Station E5+25.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material that is being removed from the proposed compactor bay area and then being loaded into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope embankment fill section dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. :10am William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment fill material at Station E 1+47 (10.39% moisture content at 98.5 % compaction) Elevation 224.1 and at Station E4+50 (11.98% moisture content at 95.2% compaction) Elevation 224 feet. 8:OOam I observed CTI deploying approximately 100 lineal feet of Type #55 Geo Grid at a benched excavation from Station E1+50 to E2+50 as defined on Sheet Number C25, Detail 1 & 2 of the Project Plans. 9:OOam I noticed that CTI is using a Walk Behind WP155 Plate Compactor to compact embankment fill material around Settlement Plates as to not disturb the plates as defined in Paragraph 3.03 Section 02300. 11:10 I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 23 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 11:15am William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment fill material at Station E2+50 (9.13% moisture content at 91.5 % compaction) Elevation 224.1 and at Station E3+50 (11.76% moisture content at 97.5% compaction) Elevation at 224 feet. General Note: Compaction requirement for Embankment material is Ninety (90) percent as defined in Section 02300 Paragraph D). 12:30pm I noticed attentively the Merlin crew (4 Laborers) are starting to install 6' wide, Type 6000 Geo -synthetic drain matting at Wall "A". The drain mat is installed directly on to the timber lagging between the Soldier Pile beams starting at the top of the wall and extending 8 inches below elevation marked for bottom of concrete. I noticed the drain mat is being securely fastened to the timber lagging backing of the King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 165 Date: 3-19-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 wall. I noticed the Merlino crew is starting installing the Delta Drain 6000 geo- synthetic matting at Pile # A5. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted, 47 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South from Station E0+60.07 to Station E5+25.17. 2:15pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to evaluate compaction of Embankment Material being placed and compacted at the East Slope section at Wall "E" for Monday, March 22, 2010. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 165 Date: 3-19-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for Compaction Testing Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons from KCML Signed King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 164 Date: 3-18-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E0+60.07 to approximately Station E5+25.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material that is being removed from the proposed compactor bay area and then being loaded into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope embankment fill section dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 8:OOam I observed CTI deploying approximately 100 lineal feet of Type #55 Geo Grid at a benched excavation from Station E2+50 to E3+50 as defined on Sheet Number C25, Detail 1 & 2 of the Project Plans. 10:OOam I noticed that CTI is using a Walk Behind WP155 Plate Compactor to compact embankment fill material around Settlement Plates as to not disturb the plates as defined in Paragraph 3.03 Section 02300. 11:00 I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 18 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 12:30pm I noticed attentively the Merlino crew (4 Laborers) are starting to install 6' wide, Type 6000 Geo -synthetic drain matting at Wall "A". The drain mat is installed directly on to the timber lagging between the Soldier Pile beams starting at the top of the wall and extending 8 inches below elevation marked for bottom of concrete. I noticed the drain mat is being securely fastened to the timber lagging backing of the wall. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted, 37 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South from Station E0+60.07 to Station E5+25.17. 2:15pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to evaluate compaction of Embankment Material being placed and compacted at the East Slope section at Wall "E" for Wednesday, March 18, 2010. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 164 Date: 3-18-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for Compaction Testing Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 163 Date: 3-17-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy x Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E0+60.07 to approximately Station E5+25.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material that is being removed from the proposed compactor bay area and then being loaded into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope embankment fill section dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:10am William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment fill material at Station E 1+47 (10.39% moisture content at 98.5 % compaction) Elevation 224.1 and at Station E4+50 (11.98% moisture content at 95.2% compaction) Elevation 224 feet. 7:30am I observed the Merlino crew (1 operator and 2 Laborers) are involved in the task of spreading plastic sheeting to cover and secure the West, North, and South embankments at the Compactor Bay Section of the Project Site. This plastic soil covering is for a long term TESC requirement as defined in Section 2370, Paragraph I, of the Project Specifications. 8:OOam I observed CTI deploying approximately 200 lineal feet of Type #55 Geo Grid at a benched excavation from Station E3+25 to E5+25 as defined on Sheet Number C25, Detail 1 & 2 of the Project Plans. 10:OOam I noticed that CTI is using a Walk Behind WP155 Plate Compactor to compact embankment fill material around Settlement Plates as to not disturb the plates as defined in Paragraph 3.03 Section 02300. 11:00 I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 20 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 38 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South from Station E0+60.07 to Station E5+25.17. 2:15pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to evaluate compaction of Embankment Material being placed and compacted at the East Slope section at Wall "E" for Wednesday, March 17, 2010. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 163 Date: 3-17-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:2:30pm 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 163 Date: 3-17-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for Compaction Testing Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None r�ti G U� Signed l 'uiwpy 'tsuoD m C) m C N K Jopadsui peal O •J6u3 tuapisaa P29Z9# O9PC 1a!xt4 •1 :s)!.iewe?:! -u o0 n O O 3 C O. CD Z 3 • fD � o n WN CP 0 W A �l W N 11) o' 0 Of b U C 0. 0 c 0 0 a) 0 c Co 0 0 0 co inW 0 ti 0 • o 0 0 0 N_ 0 T :Jo;oeJtuoO CD Woo uo!;orufsuo3 o -u 0 co r! - oaa a)le1 mos aS Jajsuail'g :'oN toafoad (S3 (0 0 Cn co0 Co suos,ed 'S we1!!!M 0 0 4 0 w C CD n i. • O • O cm ▪ 0 Cr O o w 1 ma CD la Zi 0 =c CD0 e 453 Test # mm + O m + v Station V= Offset N N N N m N < C0 -11 T CD `G CD 0 r . Z co <' CD Native Material Type of in O0) -0 . Q w w41. w -r! -. 0- -NI bo CO N �0 o -. O CO co O 0 r w 144.6 n)r) v x Cr N O N O) CoN NP fn 0 x El CO CJt N 98.5 0 C7 0 3 .0 Pass Pass D) C (n Embankment Embankment Notes • o 0 0 0 N_ 0 T :Jo;oeJtuoO CD Woo uo!;orufsuo3 o -u 0 co r! - oaa a)le1 mos aS Jajsuail'g :'oN toafoad (S3 (0 0 Cn co0 Co suos,ed 'S we1!!!M 0 0 4 0 w C CD n i. • O • O cm ▪ 0 Cr O o w 1 ma CD la Zi 0 =c CD0 e King County Department of Transportation Materials Laboratory King county concrete Compression Test Bepod 155 Monroe Avenue NF., Bldg. D, Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: (206) 296-7709 Fax: (206) 296-0179 Project: Bow Lake Transfer and Recycling Station Concrete Placed By: Gary Martino Construction Concrete Supplier. Stoneway Concrete Plant Location: Seattle #11 Project Number. R49413 Placement Inspector. Tom Reetz Tests and Cylinders by: Joe Karahuta Mix Design Number 350175 Placement Location: Sewer main line HDPE pipe anchor block on the slope Concrete Use: Anchor blocks Strength Specification: 3000ps1 Slump: 4 ' Air Content 6.0% Design w/(c+p) 0.45 Date Cylinders Cast Unit Weight: 148.3pd Temperature: 57°F Actual w/(c+p) 0.37 Time Cylinders Cast: 8:25 Aggregate Source(s): Coarse: 8.335, Fine: 13-335 at psi days 2117/10 •Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens Fracture Type Age at Testing (Days) Lab Number Date Received Date of Test Cylinder Dimensions Total Load (Lbs) Unit Load (psi) Unit Load (MPa) . Length Diameter(Y) Diameter(x). Area Type 2 7 KC -010-84 2/18/10 2/24/10 8.06in 4.021n 4.02in 12.691n2 61,805 4870 33.6 _ Type 3 28 KC -010.85 2/18/10 3/17110 8.061n 4.01in 4.01in 12.831n2 85,900 6800 46.9 Type 3 28 KC -010-86 2/18/10 3/17/10 8.061n 4.01in 4.02in 12.661n2 90,400 7140 49.2 Discarded 58 KC -010-87 2/18/10 4/14/10 Individual Compressive Strength Tests For This Project and Mix ID 'Remarks: Reference: WSDOT Std. Specifications 6-02.3(4) & 6-02.3(5). Reif tests performed using ASTM C31/C31M, C138, C143, C172, C231, and C1064. X meets Material fails t meet Approved tor Oi M[)Br above specifications. 3/17/7?2 Tested end Sutureted By: Mated* Engineer Date V� O qf` Foran hold Concrete Test Report ow 1/17/2010 Irdt181 Date Copies Distribution 2 Construction Svcs. 1 Project File Rertse& 8121/08 Second Most Recent Individual Strength Test First MostRecent Individual Strength Test Current individual Strength Test Running Average the Three Most Rent individual Strength Tests Date of Test 3111/2010 3/16/2010 3/17/2010 Cylinder Strength 5710psi 1 5560ps1 4010ps1 1 3970psi 6800psi 1 7140ps1 Average Strength 5640psi 3990ps1 6970psi 5530ps1 'Remarks: Reference: WSDOT Std. Specifications 6-02.3(4) & 6-02.3(5). Reif tests performed using ASTM C31/C31M, C138, C143, C172, C231, and C1064. X meets Material fails t meet Approved tor Oi M[)Br above specifications. 3/17/7?2 Tested end Sutureted By: Mated* Engineer Date V� O qf` Foran hold Concrete Test Report ow 1/17/2010 Irdt181 Date Copies Distribution 2 Construction Svcs. 1 Project File Rertse& 8121/08 King County Department of Transportation Materials Laboratory King County Concrete Compression Test Report 155 Monroe Avenue NE, Bldg. D, Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: (206) 296-7709 Fax: (206) 296-0179 Project: Bow Lake Transfer and Recycling Station Concrete Placed By: Concrete Supplier: • Plant Location: Gary Merlino Construction Stoneway Concrete Houser #14 :Placement Location: Project Number: R49413 Placement Inspector: Tests and Cylinders by: Tom Reetz Tara Pfaff Mix Design Number: 350175 Sewer main line HDPE pipe anchor blocks (2), East Slope Concrete Use: Anchor blocks Slump: 4 3/4" Air Content: 9.0% Unit Weight: 141.2pcf Temperature: 57°F Aggregate Source(s): Coarse: A 464, Fine: A 464 Strength Specification: 3000psi at psi days Design w/(c+p) 0.45 Date Cylinders Cast: 2/16/10 Actual w/(c+p) 0.39 Time Cylinders Cast: 8:35 ASTM C39: Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens FractureT Type Age at (Days) Lab Number Date Received Date of Test Cylinder Dimensions Total Load (Lbs) Unit Load (psi) Unit Load (MPa) Length Diameter(y) Diameter(xj; Area Type 2 7 KC -010-79 2/17/10 2/23/10 8.03in 4.01in 4.00in 12.601n2 36,105 2870 19.8 .' Type 3 28 KC -010-80 2/17/10 3/16/10 8.02in 4.01in 4.00in 12.60in2 50,530 4010 27.6 Type 3 28 KC -010-81 2/17110 3/16/10 8.03in 4.01in 4.00in 12.60in2 49,990 3970 27.4 4.. i 56 KC -010-82 2/17/10 4/13/10 :tr, History of Individual Compressive Strength Tests For This Project and Mix ID ;Remarks: Reference: WSDOT Std. Specifications 6-02.3(4) & 6-02.3(5). 'Field tests performed using ASTM C31/C31M, C138, C143, C172, C231, and C1064. !Building Permit Number is D08-389. X meets Material Approved for :Distribution By: Materials Engineer Form: Field Concrete Test Report above specifications. 1//7//e, Tested and sunntt d By: CW 3118/2010 Initial Date Copies Distribution 2 Construction Svcs. 1 Project File Revised: 8/21/08 Second Most Recent Individual Strength Test First Most Recent Individual Strength Test Current Individual Strength Test Running Average of the Three Most Recent Individual Strength Tests Date of Test 3/11/2010 3/16/2010 Cylinder Strength 5710psi 5560psi 4010psi 3970psi Average Strength 5640psi 3990psi 4815ps1 ;Remarks: Reference: WSDOT Std. Specifications 6-02.3(4) & 6-02.3(5). 'Field tests performed using ASTM C31/C31M, C138, C143, C172, C231, and C1064. !Building Permit Number is D08-389. X meets Material Approved for :Distribution By: Materials Engineer Form: Field Concrete Test Report above specifications. 1//7//e, Tested and sunntt d By: CW 3118/2010 Initial Date Copies Distribution 2 Construction Svcs. 1 Project File Revised: 8/21/08 la 155 Monroe Avenue NE, Bldg. D, King County Renton, WA 98056-4199 Department of Transportation Phone: (206) 296-7709 Materials Laboratory King County Fax: (206) 296-0179 Shoterete Compression Test Report Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station Project Number: R49413 Shotcrete Placed by: Johnson Western Gunite Company Permit Number: D08-389 Concrete Supplier: Stoneway WABO Inspector: Tara Pfaff Plant Location: Seattle #11 Mix Design Number: 575371 Placement Location: Pre -Construction Mock Up Panels Design Strength Specification: 4000psi at 7 days Slump: 2" Air Content: 5.4% Design w/(c+p) 0.43 Date Panel Cast: 3/9/10 Temperature: 67° Actual w/(c+p) 0.36 Time Panel Cast: 9:30 ASTM C 39 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concret Fracture Type YP Age et Testing (Days) Lab Number Date Received Date of Test Core Dimensions Total Load (Lbs) Unit Load (psi) Unit Load (MPa) Length Diameter(y) Diameter(x) Area Type 3 7 KC -10-159 3/12/10 3/16/10 3.97in 2.03in 2.03in 3.24in2 18,490 5710 39.4 Type 3 7 KC -10-160 3/12/10 3/16/10 3.97in 2.03in 2.03in 3.24in2 16,500 5100 35.2 Type 3 7 KC -10-161 3/12/10 3/16/10 3.97in 2.03in 2.03in 3.24in2 15,891 4910 33.9 History of Individual Compressive Strength Tests For This Project and Mix ID Remarks: Test specimens were obtained and tested in accordance with ASTM C 42, ASTM C 617 and ASTM C 39. Test specimens were cored from the mock up panels on 3/12/10. X meets Material fai o • eet Approved for Distribution By: 7.1 t)IlaterWs Englnem Form: Field Concrete Test Report above specifications. Tested and Submitted By: er)—Ty/VIP 31,Sio Inulol Da Copies Distribution 1 KPFF Engineering 1 Project File Revised: 0/21/08 Second Most Recent Individual Strength Test First Most Recent Individual Strength Test Current Individual Strength Test Running Average of the Three Most Recent Individual Strength Tests Date of Test 3/16/2010 Core Strength 5710psi 5100psi 4910psi Average Strength 5240psi Remarks: Test specimens were obtained and tested in accordance with ASTM C 42, ASTM C 617 and ASTM C 39. Test specimens were cored from the mock up panels on 3/12/10. X meets Material fai o • eet Approved for Distribution By: 7.1 t)IlaterWs Englnem Form: Field Concrete Test Report above specifications. Tested and Submitted By: er)—Ty/VIP 31,Sio Inulol Da Copies Distribution 1 KPFF Engineering 1 Project File Revised: 0/21/08 King County Department of Transportation Materials Laboratory King County Daily Inspection Report 155 Monroe Avenue NE, Bldg. D, Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: (206) 296-7709 Fax: (206) 296-0179 Project: Bow Lake Transfer and Recycling Station Project Number: R49413 Prime/Sub-Contractor: Gary Merlino Construction/Johnson Western Gunite Company Date: 3/15/2010 Permit Number: D08-389 Inspection(s) By: Laboratory Identification Numbers of Samples Obtained: Tara Pfaff KC -10-159 to KC -10-161 Report No. 17 Page: 1 of 1 Representatives from the King County Materials Laboratory arrived on site at 9:30 AM on 3/12/2010, to begin the coring operations of the shotcrote mock-up panels. Coring operations resumed and were completed on 311512010. Panels were numbered 1 through 4, starting South and heading North. Three 4" in diameter cores were taken from each panel, the full depth of tho panel, for visual examination. These cores were located to Intersect the most congested resteel intersections. Three 2" in diameter, unreintorced cores, were also taken for compressive strength testing_at 7 days, on 3/16/2010. Panel #1 was shot by Nozzleman Lee Hart. The grades of the 3 cores obtained from his panel were all (3) found to be Grade 1. Panel #2 was shot by Nozzleman Mike Junge. The grades of the 3 cores obtained from his panel were (1) Grade 1 and (2) Grade 2's. The Grade 2's were due to some small voids that exceeded the specifications of Grade 1. Panel #3 was shot by Nozzleman Pat Sexton. The grades of the 3 cores obtained from his panel were (2) Grade l's and (1) Grade 2. The Grade 2 was due to some small voids that exceeded the specifications of Grade 1. Panel #4 was shot by Nozzleman Bryan Hess-GIllis. The grade of the 3 cores obtained from his panel were (1) Grade 1 and (2) Grade 2's. The Grade 2's were due to some small voids that exceeded the specifications of Grade 1. The majority of tho small voids observed were found within a couple Inches of the shot finish. No significant defects were revealed In any of the cores. All of the (4) Nortlemen appear to have demonstrated that they can effectively encase the reinforcing steel without significant voids, rock pockets, or similar defects and apply shotcrete with an overall dense nonporous appearance. All cores have been graded in accordance with ACI 506.2-5. COMPLETED WORK REFERENCED ABOVE YES X CONFORMS WITH PROJECT REQUIREMENTS REINSPECTION REQUIRED - INCOMPLETE YES WORK OR DEFICIENCY NOTED Special Inspector Form: Concrete Field inspectonfresl Report 3/15`/D Reviewed By NO NO ty/0 Oalo Revised: march 6, 2007 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 162 Date: 3-16-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E0+60.07 to approximately Station E5+25.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material that is being removed from the proposed compactor bay area and then being loaded into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope embankment fill section dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 8:OOam I observed CTI deploying approximately 200 lineal feet of Type #55 Geo Grid at a benched excavation from Station E3+25 to E5+25 as defined on Sheet Number C25, Detail 1 & 2 of the Project Plans. 10:OOam I noticed that CTI is using a Walk Behind WP155 Plate Compactor to compact embankment fill material around Settlement Plates as to not disturb the plates as defined in Paragraph 3.03 Section 02300. 11:00 I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 20 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 42 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South from Station E0+60.07 to Station E5+25.17. 2:15pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to evaluate compaction of Embankment Material being placed and compacted at the East Slope section at Wall "E" for Wednesday, March 17, 2010. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 162 Date: 3-16-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for Compaction Testing Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed ' ' OV*11.'L .1 m D,,, duUeneox3 — ad n rD rt King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 161 Date: 3-15-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material that is being removed from the proposed compactor bay area and then being loaded into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope embankment fill section dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 8:OOam I observed CTI deploying approximately 200 lineal feet of Type #55 Geo Grid at a benched excavation from Station E4+10 to E6+10 as defined on Sheet Number C25, Detail 1 & 2 of the Project Plans. 10:30am I noticed that CTI is using a Walk Behind WP155 Plate Compactor to compact embankment fill material around Settlement Plates as to not disturb the plates as defined in Paragraph 3.03 Section 02300. 11:00 I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 20 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 46 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:15pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to evaluate compaction of Embankment Material being placed at the East Slope section at Wall "E". 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 161 Date: 3-15-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed TikklaaA444t—• 00 E Li] c 0 E CI) King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 160 Date: 3-12-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #4 Removal of Burn Fill as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile located West of the WSDOT stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 8:OOam I observed Merlino (Josh) is involved with the task of staking the defined Horizontal alignment and bottom of wall elevations at the "toe" of Wall "E" at Station E0+00 to Station E6+82. He is using a GPS Survey instrument to accomplish this task. 8:40am I assisted in document control filing of 1 Vs" Recycled Concrete load tickets delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 9:30am I noticed the Merlino crew is repairing damage to the silt fence located East of the WSDOT stockpile. They have employed two laborers and a Case 580L Backhoe to accomplish this task. 10:OOam I continued to review Project Electrical plans and specifications at the Project Trailer. 11:OOpm I assisted in document control filing of Burn Fill load tickets hauled off the Project Site by CTI's Tractor Trailer Trucks on March 9th and 10th , 2010 1:15pm I noticed the Merlino carpenters have installed horizontal timber bracing at Wall "C" from Soldier Pile C-27 to Soldier Pile C-19 2:OOpm I noticed that CTI has repaired their Johnson 605 Street Sweeper and have resumed their daily sweeping operations at the Project Site as required. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 160 Date: 3-12-10 Counteract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed TESC — Sediment Pond after Thursdays Rain Event — Bid Item 1 King County Department of Transportation Materials Laboratory King County Concrete Compression Test Report 155 Monroe Avenue NE, Bldg. D, Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: (206) 296-7709 Fax: (206) 296-0I79 Project: Bow Lake Transfer and Recycling Station :Prime/Sub-Contractor: Gary Merlino/Cruncher Construction Concrete Supplier: Stoneway Plant Location: Seattle Mix Design Number: 350175 Placement Location: Sewer Main line HDPE Pipe Anchor Block, East Slope Sample Curing Temperatures: Minimum Project Number: R49413 Date: 2/11/2010 Page: 1 of 1 Report No. 12 Permit Number: D08-389 Inspection/Tests By: Tara Pfaff Maximum Req'd Strength: 3000psi at 28 days Slump': 5 3/4" Air Content': 6.0% Design w/(c+p) Unit Weight': 145.0 pcf Temperature': 58.3° Actual w/(c+p) 0.45 Time Cylinders Cast: 9:15 0.38 Aggregate Source(s): B -335/B-335 NOTE 1: Field tests performed following ASTM C31/C31 M, C138, C143, C172, C231, and C1064 procedures ASTM C39: Test Method for Compressive Strentath of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens Lab Number Age al Testing (Days) Date Received Date of Test Cylinder Dimensions Fracture Type Total Load (Lbs) Unit Load (psi) Unit Load (MPa) Length Diameter(y) Diameter(x) Area KC -10-72 7 2/12/10 2/18/10 8.03in 4.01in 4.02in 12.66in' Type 3 51,970 4100 28.3 KC -10-73 28 2/12/10 3/11/10 8.021n 4.01in 4.021n 12.661n' Type 2 72,255 5710 39.4 KC -10-74 28 2/12/10 3/11/10 8.04in 4.01in 4.O2in 12.66in' Type 2 70,345 5560 38.3 KC -10-75 History of Individual Compressive Strength Tests For This Project and Mix ID Remarks: THE MATERIALS TESTED AS REFERENCED ABOVE CONFORM WITH PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Approved for Distribution By: (701 �--- '3/j (G) Materials Engineer Date Form: Concreto Compression Test Report X YES Copies Distribution NO Tested and Sub lied By: CW 3!1112010 Initial Date Revised: 03/07/2007 Second Most Recent Individual Strength Test First Most Recent Individual Strength Test Current Individual Strength Test Running Average of the Three Most Recent Individual Strength Tests Date of Test 3/11/2010 Cylinder Strength 5710psi 5560psi Average Strength 5640psi Remarks: THE MATERIALS TESTED AS REFERENCED ABOVE CONFORM WITH PROJECT REQUIREMENTS Approved for Distribution By: (701 �--- '3/j (G) Materials Engineer Date Form: Concreto Compression Test Report X YES Copies Distribution NO Tested and Sub lied By: CW 3!1112010 Initial Date Revised: 03/07/2007 King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 159 Date: 3-11-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile located West of the WSDOT stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 7:30am I noticed CTI ( 1 Operator) has employed their Hitachi 450 Excavator at the South end of the East embankment at Wall "E" to pull slope at a 2.8:1 vertical incline from Station E0+55 to E1+55. 8:OOam I observed Merlino (Josh) is involved with the task of staking the defined Horizontal alignment and bottom of wall elevations at the "toe" of Wall "E" at Station E0+00 to Station E6+82. He is using a GPS Survey instrument to accomplish this task. 9:OOam I returned to the Project Site Office to assist in documentation control and administrative filing for 1 1/4" minus Recycled Concrete delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 10:OOam I noticed the Merlino crew is repairing damage to the silt fence Jocated East of the WSDOT stockpile. They have employed two laborers and a Case 580L Backhoe to accomplish this task. 11:OOam I continued to review Project Electrical plans and specifications at the Project Trailer. 12:OOpm I assisted in document control fling of 1 1/4" Recycled Concrete load tickets delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 1:15pm I noticed the Merlin carpenters have installed horizontal timber bracing at Wall "C" from Soldier Pile C-36 to Soldier Pile C-27. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 159 Date: 3-11-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed - (i/ r. ' 1.:•••• • • • 4. l#1 King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 158 Date: 3-10-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:3:00pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #3 Removal of Burn Fill as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:OOam I arrived at the Project Site. 6:05am General Note: CTI loaded -out the first truck/trailer combination with Burn Fill for transport to Cedar Hills Regional Landfill at 6:OOam. Material is being loaded from the south east end of the WSDOT pile and Kimberly Reinauer (Hart Crowser Geologist) is monitoring load -out operations 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile located West of the WSDOT stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 7:30am I noticed CTI ( 1 Operator) has employed their Hitachi 450 Excavator at the South end of the East embankment at Wall "E" to pull slope at a 2.8:1 vertical incline from Station E2+07 to E1+03. 9:OOam I attended the weekly Construction Meeting conducted at Merlino's Project Trailer. 9:55am The weekly Construction meeting adjourned. 10:OOam I returned to the Project Site Office to assist in documentation control and administrative filing for 1 '/a" minus Recycled Concrete delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 11:05am I attended a Pre -Construction Meeting at Merlino's Job Trailer to discuss the Electrical plans and details for future installation at the Project Site. (Potelco, Amaya, Merlino, KPFF, and myself attended the meeting. 11:40am The Electrical Pre -Construction Meeting was adjourned. 11:11 am CTI loaded -out the last truck/trailer combination of Burn Fill for transport to Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. Kimberly Reinauer (Hart Crowser) stated that 76 total loads went out today. CTI has 23 Tractor Trailer Trucks operating today to haul burn fill material. 1:15pm I noticed the Merlino carpenters have installed horizontal timber bracing at Wall "C" from Soldier Pile C-87 to Soldier Pile C-36. 2:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 158 Date: 3-10-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:3:00pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? , Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed 0 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 157 Date: 3-09-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #3 Removal of Burn Fill as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am General Note: CTI loaded -out the first truck/trailer combination with Burn Fill for transport to Cedar Hills Regional Landfill at 6:OOam. Material is being loaded from the south east end of the WSDOT pile and Grant (Hart Crowser Geologist) is monitoring load -out operations 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile located West of the WSDOT stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 7:30am I noticed CTI ( 1 Operator) has employed their Hitachi 450 Excavator at the South end of the East embankment at Wall "E" to pull slope at a 2.8:1 vertical incline from Station E2+07 to E1+03. 8:15am Johnson /Western / Gunnite Shotcrete Crew arrives at the Project Site to set up and prepare equipment for today's shotcreting and sculpture finish work of 8' X 8' fabricated test panels at Wall "A". .10:OOam I returned to the Project Site Office to assist in documentation control and administrative filing for 1 ''A" minus Recycled Concrete delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 11:OOam I began reviewing electrical plans and specifications in preparation for tomorrows Electrical Pre -Construction meeting scheduled at Merlino's Trailer at 11:OOam 11:57am CTI loaded -out the last truck/trailer combination of Burn Fill for transport to Cedar Hills Regional Landfill. Anne Conrad (Hart Crowser) stated that 76 total loads went out today. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 157 Date: 3-09-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X None Signed ti -t- a.)4,- King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 156 Date: 3-08-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:OOam Time Work Stopped:1:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday x Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast x Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 7:OOam I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 7:30am I noticed CTI ( 1 Operator) has employed their Hitachi 450 Excavator at the East embankment at Wall "E" to pull slope at a 2.8:1 vertical incline from Station E2+07 to E4+33. 9:OOam I returned to the Project Site Office to assist in documentation control and administrative filing for 1 ''A" minus Recycled Concrete delivered to the Project Site by CTI. 1:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 156 Date: 3-08-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:OOam Time Work Stopped:1:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X Signed '/�i.. (QAC '££+j7 01 LO+Za uo[1EIs uioJJ / \ rrj + k • ƒUk/ j j cn cn ° 7 -cn.73 E. CD / 8 cn / 0 = pc- %/ 0 // 0o.• ƒ.0 m % a §. CD ƒ0 S'% 6ƒ ■ R • ®S 0 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 155 Date: 3-05-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E3+07.80 to approximately Station E6+15 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section dumped, and then spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor, 2 Laborers, and 1 operator) are involved with the task of installing a 12", 45 degree Ductile Iron Pipe (FLXMJ) at Station A2+53 (Point #107 to Point #108) They have employed a Cat 320C and a Cat 930G loader to assist in completing this task. 9:30am Highline Water Department (John Stanley) arrives at the Project Site to observe Merlino's 17 lineal feet of 12" Ductile Iron Pipe with two sleeves and 6 Mega Lugs installation procedures From Point #107 to Point #108 at Wall "A". 11:30am I observed all mechanical fixtures, gaskets, Mega Lugs, and Ductile Iron Pipe being thoroughly cleaned with a chloride and water solution prior to installation. 12:30pm I measured the 12" dia Ductile Iron Pipe for a minimum cover of 3' 6" and a maximum of 6' 0" (General Note #6 Plans Sheet C54). 1:15pm I observed the installation of the 17 lineal feet of 12" Ductile Iron Pipe with a 45 degree bend has been completed. I observed all bolting snug tight and Mega Lugs nuts tightened to their snap off position. 1:30pm I noticed that Merlino is now started back filling the pipe trench line at Point #107 to Point #108 using Type #17 Gravel Borrow Material. They are using a Cat 930G Loader to transport and spread the material in 6 to 8" lifts and compact the material with their Cat 320C with Hoe-Pac. 1:55pm Merlino is now placing and compacting in "cold mix asphalt", in three to four inch lifts, using their Cat 930 G loader to transport and spread the asphalt mix. They will now compact the asphalt mix using their Cat 320C with Hoe-Pac. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 40 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 155 Date: 3-05-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 2:30pm 1 departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 155 Date: 3-05-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X John Stanley (Highline Water District) William Parsons (KCML) Signed ' 3' v')tv .. ---- •. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 154 Date: 3-04-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:OOam Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has suspended the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North due to highly saturated soil conditions at the stock pile from where their loading and hauling operations originate. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor, 1 Laborer, and 1 operator) are involved with the task of installing a 12x 12x8" 45 degree Ductile Iron Pipe Reducing WYE (FLXFXFL) with a 8" Gate Valve (FLXMJ) at Station A13+88.53 (Point #116) They have employed a Cat 320C and a Cat 930G loader to assist in completing this task. 9:30am Scott Davis from Highline Water Department arrives at the Project Site to observe Merlino's Pipe and Gate valve installation procedures at Point #116. 11:30am I observed all mechanical fixtures, gaskets, Gate Valve and Ductile Iron Pipe being thoroughly cleaned with a chloride and water solution prior to installation. 12:30pm I measured the 8" dia Ductile Iron Pipe for a minimum cover of 3' 6" and a maximum of 6' 0" (General Note #6 Plans Sheet C54). 2:15pm I observed the installation of the 45 degree WYE and 8" Gate Valve has been completed. I observed all bolting snug tight and mag nuts tightened to their snap off position. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. i 1 1••• ater Mani — Bolt Ti htenin at All Points of the Gate Valve and Pi 'e Assembl A "ater Main — Bolt Tightening at All Points of the Gate Valve and Pi ie Assembl A King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 153 Date: 3-03-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section dumped, and then spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 1 Laborer, and 1 operator) are involved with the task of installing a 4" dia IPS Schedule 40 perforated drain pipe at the bottom of Wall "D" from Station A14+73.84 to Station A15+65.49 They are using a Cat 320C Excavator to excavate the trench line to prescribed plan elevations and removing the spoils into an off road haul truck. The spoils are then being transported to the North end of the WSDOT stockpile section. 8:40am I observed Merlino crew is now deploying Type B Geotextile Filter Fabric at the bottom of the trench line at Wall "D" as outlined in the Project Plans (Detail A, Sheet S406). They will now place pipe approximately 2 -3 inches of pipe bedding material using their Cat 930G loader, on top of the fabric before installing the Schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. 9:OOam I noticed Merlino pipe crew is now placing pipe bedding material on top of the previously installed PVC pipe and then wrap the Geotextile fabric over the top of the pipe and pipe bedding material. (Note: Detail A Sheet S406) 10:OOam I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 1 Laborer, and 1 operator) are involved with the task of installing a 4" dia IPS Schedule 40 perforated drain pipe at the bottom of Wall "A" from Station A3+84 to Station A4+80. They are using a Cat 320C Excavator to excavate the trench line to prescribed plan elevations and removing the spoils into an off road haul truck. The spoils are then being transported to the North end of the WSDOT stockpile section. 10:30am I observed Merlino crew is now deploying Type B Geotextile Filter Fabric at the bottom of the trench line at Wall "A" as outlined in the Project Plans (Detail A, Sheet S406). They will now place pipe approximately 2 -3 inches of pipe bedding material using their Cat 930G loader, on top of the fabric before installing the Schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. 11:OOam I noticed Merlino pipe crew is now placing pipe bedding material on top of King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 153 Date: 3-03-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 the previously installed PVC pipe and then wrap the Geotextile fabric over the top of the pipe and pipe bedding material. (Note: Detail A Sheet S406) 12:45pm I observed the Merlino Pipe crew has deployed Geotextile fabric, placed pipe bedding material, installed Schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe and wrapped the Geotextile fabric over the top of the pipe and pipe bedding material at Wall "D" from Station A14+73.84 to Station A15+65.49 and at Wall "A" from Station A3+84 to Station A4+80. 12:50pm William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E2+07 (9.04% moisture content at 92.6 % compaction) and at Station E4+35 (9.11% moisture content at 94.1 % compaction) Elevations at both locations were at 221.0 feet. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 70 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. A La King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 153 Date: 3-03-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X Scott Davis (Highline Water District) William Parsons (KCML) Signed a King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 152 Date: 3-02-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section dumped, and then spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 2 operators) are involved with the task of hydrostatically flushing the Water Main Line (approximately 400 lineal feet) at Wall "A" for purity of water test from approximate Station locations A4+00 to A16+50. 8:OOam I observed Merlino pipe foreman connecting a water hose at the Fire Hydrant at Station 16+50 to Merlino's 8,000 gallon Water Tanker at Wall A to bleed the water line in preparation for pressure and purity testing to be observed by myself and Scott Davis form Highline Water District. 8:30am I was informed by Merlino's Pipe Crew Forman that no leaks were observed at the pipe and resilient seat valve gate fittings at the exposed pipe at Points #110 and #111 after applying sufficient pressure to the Water line system at Wall "A" (Note: 250 PSI applied to Water Linen as per Technical Sections in 02510 Paragraph 3.09). 9:OOam The results of the third Hydrostatic Pressure Test (250 lbs per square inch) of pressure applied to the Water Line from approximate Stations A4+00 to A16+50 proved to be successful as not more than 1 lb of pressure was lost in the fifteen minutes allowed from the start of the test. I was informed that mud and debris in the 12" dia Ductile Iron Pipe and a flaw in the 90 degree galvanized 2" dia pipe fitting at Point #107 appears to have been the problems that caused the pipe line to unsuccessfully hold the sufficient pressure required. The mud and debris collected on the inside of the 12"dia Ductile Iron Pipe, although I observed the pipe ends being cleaned before assembling, can be attributed to poor storage procedures. 9:15am Scott Davis arrives at the Project Site to witness the Hydrostatic Pressure Test and to obtain purity samples from the water main line at blow -off assemblies starting at Point #110 at the Water Main Line at Wall "A" 10:02am I observed Scott Davis (HWD) begin taking water purity sample at blow off King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 152 Date: 3-02-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 assembly point #110. 12:02pm I witnessed Scott Davis (HWD) has taken the last water purity sample from the Fire Hydrant located at Station 16+50. I observed water purity samples obtained from the blow off assembly points #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, and #118 at the water main line for Wall "A". 12:OOpm William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E3+56 (10.16% moisture content at 99.5 % compaction) and at Station E5+32 (7.86% moisture content at 94.5% compaction) Elevations at both locations were at 220.0 feet. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 50 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 152 Date: 3-02-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X Scott Davis (Highline Water District) William Parsons (KCML) Signed '41/- VV 5. c p I 5 fb u io Q 3 —• S (D -n Ro '? c:f�r�a- a• • ,l King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 151 Date: 3-01-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item #6 Relocation of Embankment Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into one off road haul truck. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section dumped, and then spread with a D6 Dozer, and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 3 Laborers, and 2 operators) are involved with the task of hydrostatically testing the Water Main Line (approximately 400 lineal feet) at Wall "A" from approximate Station locations A4+00 to A16+50. 9:OOam I observed Merlino pipe foreman installing water hose at Point #110 at the water line at Wall A to "slowly" fill and bleed the water line in preparation for future pressure testing to be observed by myself and Scott Davis form Highline Water District. 9: l0am I observed the Merlino Pipe Crew is actively involved excavating to expose the pipe and gate valves at Points #110 and #111 at Wall "A". They are using their Hitachi 300X excavator to excavate the pipe trench line at these locations. The excavated spoils (primarily Type #17 Gravel Borrow material are being stock piled next to the trench line and will then be used later as back fill for the pipe and trench line. 9:15am Scott Davis arrives at the Project Site to witness the Hydrostatic Pressure Test conducted by the Merlin Pipe Crew for the Water Main Line at Wall "A" 9:30am I was informed by Merlino's Pipe Crew Forman that no leaks were observed at the pipe and resilient seat valve gate fittings at the exposed pipe at Points #110 and #111 after applying sufficient pressure to the Water line system at Wall "A" (Note: 250 PSI applied to Water Linen as per Technical Sections in 02510 Paragraph 3.09). 10:30am The results of the second Hydrostatic Pressure Test (250 lbs per square inch) pressure applied to the Water Line from approximate Stations A4+00 to A16+50 proved to be successful as not more than 1 lb of pressure was lost in the fifteen minutes allowed from the start of the test. I was informed that mud and debris in the 12" dia Ductile Iron Pipe and a flaw in the 90 degree galvanized 2" dia pipe fitting appears to have been the problems that caused the pipe line to unsuccessfully 1 A. h O. e King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 150 Date: 2-26-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#3 Removal of Refuse Material as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has stopped the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are exporting "High Fines" and Refuse material using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the material into their Tractor Trailer Trucks and then transported off the Project Site to CHRL. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 3 Laborers, and 2 operators) are involved with the task of hydrostatically testing the Water Main Line (approximately 400 lineal feet) at Wall "A". 9:OOam I observed Merlino pipe foreman installing water hose at Point #110 at the water line at Wall A to "slowly" fill and bleed the water line in preparation for future pressure testing to be observed by myself and Scott Davis form Highline Water District. 9:10am I observed the Merlino Pipe Crew is actively involved excavating to expose the pipe and gate valves at Points #110 and #111 at Wall "A". They are using their Hitachi 300X excavator to excavate the pipe trench line at these locations. The excavated spoils (primarily Type #17 Gravel Borrow material are being stock piled next to the trench line and will then be used later as back fill for the pipe and trench line. 11:OOam I was informed by Merlin's Pipe Crew Forman that no leaks were observed at the pipe and fittings at the exposed pipe at Points #110 and #111 after applying sufficient pressure to the Water line system at Wall "A" (Note: 150 PSI applied to Water Line). 12:OOpm The results of the second Hydrostatic Pressure Test (150 lbs per square inch) pressure applied to the Water Line proved to be successful as not more than 5 lbs of pressure were lost in the fifteen minutes allowed. The I was informed that mud and debris in the 12" dia Ductile Iron Pipe appears to have been the problem that caused the pipe line to unsuccessfully hold the sufficient pressure required. The mud and debris collected on the inside of the 12"dia Ductile Iron Pipe, although I observed the pipe ends being cleaned before assembling, can be attributed to poor storage procedures. 1:30pm I observed Merlino is now beginning to back fill below and on top of the 12" Ductile Iron Pipe and Gate Valve Assemblies at Points #110 and #111. They are King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 150 Date: 2-26-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station using their Cat 938G Loader to Place the Pipe Bedding and Type #17 Gravel Borrow material and a walk behind "jumping jack" plate compactor to compact the material in 3" to 6" lifts. 3:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 150 Date: 2-26-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X ) Signed e*.a6 � "�� 0 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 149 Date: 2-25-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into two off road haul trucks. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section and dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 3 Laborers, and 2 operators) are involved with the task of hydrostatically testing the Water Main Line (approximately 400 lineal feet) at Wall "A". 9:30am I observed Merlino pipe foreman installing water hose at Point #110 at the water line at Wall A to "slowly" fill and bleed the water line in preparation for future pressure testing to be observed by myself and Scott Davis form Highline Water District. 9:30am Scott Davis from Highline Water District arrives at the Project Site to inspect Merlino's pressure testing for the waterline at Wall "A". 12:00pm,The results of the preliminary Hydrostatic Pressure Test (150 lbs per squ0re inch) pressure applied to the Water Line proved to be unsuccessful as more than 5 lbs of pressure were lost in the fifteen minutes allowed. 1:45pm I observed the Merlino Pipe crew is actively involved in bleeding the air from the Water line. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 27 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 3:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 149 Date: 2-25-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown (KCML) / Scott Davis (Highline Water District) Signed i.j,.' it K . East Slope — Compacting the Unstable Section above Wall "E" South Kiang County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 148 Date: 2-24-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI is continuing with the task of placing embankment fill material behind Wall "E" South at Station E2+06.07 to approximately Station E5+55.17 behind Wall "E" North. They are using a Hitachi 450 Excavator to load the embankment material into two off road haul trucks. The embankment material is then transported to the East slope fill section and dumped, spread with a D6 Dozer and compacted using a Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 7:30am I noticed Merlino pipe crew (1 Supervisor and 3 Laborers, and 2 operators) are involved with the task of installing a 4" dia IPS Schedule 40 perforated drain pipe at the bottom of Wall "A" from Station A4+40 to the angle point at Station A8+59. They are using a Hitachi 300x Excavator to excavate the trench line to prescribed plan elevations and removing the spoils into an off road haul truck. The spoils are then being transported to the North end of the WSDOT stockpile section. 8:30am I observed Merlino crew is now deploying Type B Geotextile Filter Fabric at the bottom of the trench line at Wall "A" as outlined in the Project Plans (Detail A, Sheet S406). They will now place pipe approximately 2 -3 inches of pipe bedding material on top of the fabric before installing the Schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe. 9:OOam I noticed Merlino pipe crew is now placing pipe bedding material on top of the previously installed PVC pipe and then wrap the Geotextile fabric over the top of the pipe and pipe bedding material. (Note: Detail A Sheet S406) 9:30am I observed Merlino pipe foreman installing water hose at Point #110 at the water line at Wall A to "slowly" fill and bleed the water line in preparation for future pressure testing to be observed by myself and Scott Davis form Highline Water District. 9:30am Scott Davis from Highline Water District arrives at the Project Site to inspect Merlino's pressure testing for the waterline at Wall "A". 12:OOpm Maser Brown from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E2+06(18.6% moisture content at 97.2 % compaction) Elevation 216.0 and at Station E3+07 (10.2% moisture content at 92.5% compaction.) 1:OOpm Merlino (Josh) has surveyed the trench line for the under drain being installed to ensure pipe installation is at the correct elevation and bottom of concrete Count Bow Lake Recycle ' 8 TransferStation Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 148 Date: 2-24-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 at Wall "A". 1:45pm I observed the Merlino Pipe crew has deployed Geotextile fabric, placed pipe bedding material, installed Schedule 40 perforated PVC pipe and wrapped the Geotextile fabric over the top of the pipe and pipe bedding material at Station A4+40 to Station A8+59. 2:OOpm I observed the CTI has transported, dumped, spread, and compacted 46 Off Road Haul Truck loads of embankment material at the East Slope at Wall "E" North and South. 3:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 148 Date: 2-24-10 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:3:00pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown (KCML) / Scott Davis (Highline Water District) Signed r 4 w . -q King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 105 Date: 12-17-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 10:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:30am I observed CTI has stopped the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E1+30 to approximately Station E2+70 due to a significant rain event last night and predicted rain in the forecast for today. 8:OOam I visually inspected Wall "E" North and South for erosion control. I noticed no significant signs of any damage to the Project Site at these locations 9:OOam I returned to the Project Site Office to work on administrative duties. 9:30am I spoke with William Parsons from KCML and informed him that his services would not be needed today and that I would keep him informed on a daily basis for scheduling his services. 10:30am I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 105 Date: 12-17-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 10:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X Signed Ck6-0,144-4---- King County Dept. of Transportation Materials Laboratory Aggregate Test Data 155 Monroe Ave. NE, Bldg D Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: 206.296.7709 Fax: 206.296.0179 Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station Type of Material: Gravel Borrow Purpose of Sample: Assurance Sampled At: Project Site Stockpile Name and Location of Source: CTI Project Number. R49413 Lab Sample Number. KC -09.1464 Date Sampled: 12/2/09 Sampled By: JK Total Weight 14.33 kg Sieve 4" Retained Weight 0.00 Required Spec. 100 'Percent Passing 100 Percent Fractured #10 2" 0.00 75-100 100 #40 11/2" 0.00 17 100 1" 0.00 _ 100 3/4" 0.23 98 5/8" 1.33 91 1/2" 306 79 #200 Wash (AASHTO 3/8" 4.67 5146.5 g 67 5072.0 g 1/4" 5.48 15.0 Max 62 I #4 6.02 50-80 58 Fract. Wt. Avg. + #4: Fracture Spec: Dust Ratio: Dust Ratio Spec: Sand Equivalent(AASHTO T176): SE Spec: Pit #: 8-231 Subsample Weight 539.5 g Retained Sieve Weight Required Spec. Percent Percent Passing Fra,I #10 108.3 46 #40 381.2 30.0 Max 17 1 #200 Wash (AASHTO T11A): Mass Before: 5146.5 g Mass After: 5072.0 g #200 I 15.0 Max I 1.4 I Remarks: Ref. (AASHTO T2, TI1(A), T27, T176, T248, TP61) 83 Earthwork 16/32 Table 6 Gravel Borrow. 50 Min X meets Material specifications. does not meet Reviewed By: Approved for Distribution By: Inspector Remarks: ----7 /2 /i9 Materials Engineer Date: 12/3/09 Tested By: Tara Pfaff Distribution: Date(s): To: # Copies 1 — 1 1 Bow Lake Transfer Station.xls Resident Engineer Project Engineer Const. Admin. Contractor Pit Log Mat Lab File Fax Fax King County Dept. of Transportation Materials Laboratory Aggregate Test Data 155 Monroe Ave. NE, Bldg D Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: 206.296.7709 Fax: 206.296.0179 Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station Type of Material: Gravel Borrow Purpose of Sample: Assurance Sampled At: Onsite Name and Location of Source: CTI Project Number: R49413 Lab Sample Number: KC -09-1454 Date Sampled: 11/20/09 Sampled By: JK Total Weight: 12:99 kg I Sieve 4" Retained Weight 0.00 Required Spec. 100 Percent Passing 100 Percent Fractured 107.6 2" 0.00 75-100 100 378.9 1 1/2" 0.00 1 100 1" 0.00 100 3/4" 0.13 99 5/8" 1.13 91 1/2" 2.64 80 T11A): 3/8" 4.12 Mass After: 68 #200 1/4" 4.90 I 1.5 62 #4 5.39 50-80 59 Fract. Wt. Avg. + #4: Fracture Spec: Dust Ratio: Dust Ratio Spec: Sand Equivalent(AASHTO T176): SE Spec: 80 50 Min Material '6 meets does not meet specifications. Reviewed By: Approved for Distribution By: Inspector Remarks: Pit #: B-231 Subsample Weight: 531.1 g Retained Sieve Weight Required Spec. Percent Percent Passing FraFctured; #10 107.6 47 1 #40 378.9 30.0 Max 17 1 1 #200 Wash (AASHTO T11A): Mass Before: 5085.4 g Mass After: 5011.1 g #200 I 15.0 Max I 1.5 I Remarks: Ref: (AASHTO T2, T11(A), T27, T176, T248, TP61) Earthwork 16/32 Table 6 Gravel Borrow. Date: 11/23/09 Tested By: JK Distribution: Date(s): To: # Copies 1 1 , 1 1 Bow Lake Transfer Station Resident Engineer Project Engineer Const. Admin. Contractor Pit Log Mat Lab File Fax Fax King County Dept. of Transportation Materials Laboratory Aggregate Test Data 155 Monroe Ave. NE, Bldg D Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: 206.296.7709 Fax: 206.296.0179 Project: Type of Material: Bow Lake Transfer Station Native, silty gravel with sand and cobbles Purpose of Sample: Classification Sampled At: Onsite Name and Location of Source: N/A Project Number: R49413 Lab Sample Number: KC -09-1429 Date Sampled: 11/12/09 Sampled By: JK Pit #: N/A Total Weight: 25.14 g Sieve 6" Retained Weight 0.00 Required Spec. Percent Passing 100 Percent Fractured Percent Fractured 5" 3.63 1 86 3" 7.23 71 2" 8.64 66 1" 11.39 55 3/4" 12.30 51 1/2" 13.79 45 3/8" 14.48 Mass After: g 42 1/4" 15.24 39 #4 15.64 38 Fract. Wt. Avg. + #4: Fracture Spec: Dust Ratio: Dust Ratio Spec: Sand Equivalent(AASHTO T176): SE Spec: meets Material specifications. does not meet Reviewed By: Approved for Distribution By: Inspector Remarks: 443d2)- /1/7/7 aterials Engineer Subsample Weight: 642.2 g Sieve Retained Weight Required Spec. Percent Passing Percent Fractured #10 20.6 1 37 #40 154.4 29 #50 228.8 24 #100 388.6 15 #200 492.4 8.8 #200 Wash (AASHTO T11A): Mass Before: g Mass After: g #200 I 1 1I Remarks: Ref: (AASHTO T2, T11(A), T27, T176, T248, TP61) Informational Date: 11/16/09 Tested By: CW Distribution: Date(s): To: # Copies 1 1 1 1 Bow Lake Transfer Station.xls Resident Engineer Project Engineer Const. Admin. Contractor Pit Log Mat Lab File Fax Fax *UPPV py 'MOO T 13 0 a0 0 Joioadsui peal 'IIIBM 10 00e1 WO.ij spew 'Z 'J6U3 iuep!saa Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 -13 0 (moi m 0 0 0 l c ccp z 3 Q CD 0 O N A w 0 O w N W 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 3 3 13 0 0 n O O m � c U) Q a O N (W X o W N C en ID O V1 z O 01 re m 0 O 3 0) .. 0u09, < to O 0 !•W u0018. 'dad AMMITAN 0 10 0 0 CD W 0 0 O Woo'uoitonapuo3 ou!!a 9) z O suosaed 'S Ww!II!M aaa exe7 Mob uoiteiS ie sueil'8 t7 CO cu CD O fro '1 0 o�� cnB. w_ 0 0 m 600Z/9111.1. t In T 3 x�;R N � > 0' o D IJ `' •.3 _ V N W ry c c 0' Z J 71 —ra E Oc 1 137 w 0) Test # N 01 4+50 Station o (° Offset 1162.15' 162.15' mG) m m < Q - m "T1 71 - <1:1 CD 0 (D ."` 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type 0 o 0)0) 0 0 Cr 0) CO 6 A --I ?! 0 a 0) 0) W W 0 0 O (0 (0 0 ° 4 A 139.3 139.3 ppa)� W X Q 124.9 124.0 N N 126.9 126.9 o x CC) CO NI A 0 0 3 7' Pass Pass Pass / Notes Fail Wall E North Wall E North !•W u0018. 'dad AMMITAN 0 10 0 0 CD W 0 0 O Woo'uoitonapuo3 ou!!a 9) z O suosaed 'S Ww!II!M aaa exe7 Mob uoiteiS ie sueil'8 t7 CO cu CD O fro '1 0 o�� cnB. w_ 0 0 m 600Z/9111.1. t In T 3 x�;R N � > 0' o D IJ `' •.3 _ V N W ry c c 0' Z J 71 —ra E Oc eTh C- 'uiwpy 'lsuo3 O 0 O Joloadsui peal '!!em to Goal woal stasuO 'Z 'J6u3 luepisad Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 0 0 c CD Z c 3 CD 0 11)N J /A�� sa (D CO 0 0 CO co 0 0 03 03z 0) vi Er 0 0 N 0 0 0 o 3 3 a, v o 0 m c 5 co O (D a a 0 N IV X Q en 71 0 (.) N C i O o Q co 13 cab ID .moi m 0 O 3 A Ot 0" - O 0) (D w O cO 0 (9 0 o) 0 is z O (D NUIZZIMIUMM 'd d Usuea Aae 0 0 0 (D w o 0 0 Woo uo!lanalsuo3 ou!la aaa a4ei nnog 0 m o D (D' (n z Z 0 O (O i GJ suosJed 'S We1IIIM 600Z/LL/1. l 41. o w co 138 Test # 6+27 5+78 5+25 cn w_ 0 (0 + 1 T — Offset 165.57' 163.57' 163.57' m0 m w < a m - - -I U) '< (D CD . Native 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type p J o 6 o O) Or Q co 6 (O a W __. U)CD fD 8.0 COrn W W Oo • 9 rn G) CO CO \° o 1# A 5.0 J 139.3 cow W 0) T x V 128.1 123.1 N N 0) CD N a 129.7 J IV CO co J a) (o 0 O ?<. 0 CO b° 97.0 CO O) 0) 0 O 3 Pass Pass Pass Pass / Fail Wall E North Wall E North Wall E North Notes NUIZZIMIUMM 'd d Usuea Aae 0 0 0 (D w o 0 0 Woo uo!lanalsuo3 ou!la aaa a4ei nnog 0 m o D (D' (n z Z 0 O (O i GJ suosJed 'S We1IIIM 600Z/LL/1. l 'U[Wpd 1SUoo Jo3oedsui peel a O 3 d f. • •J6u3 1ueptsea C) 0 0 0 0 O (D anmsio iva a.. 3d) Al!SuG JI 0 13 0 0 7 coo O 0 Wo3 uogona;suoO ou!laeyy T D cn Z 0 CO 0 0 0 uO! S ae}sueal g -13 0. CD 0 Z 0 60 4) suosaed •S We!!I!AA 600Z/81411 w. . N 0 00 0 o 0 y Ei O co V• O P COCN CD 7 ..F c W 0 IC C CD 00 A N A " Test # Station CA N v+ CZ O 03 13' al Offset W W Grade/ Elev. 23 - (i) N (D '• 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type -• o in -k O in 0 I— -0 0) f• Q .4 °) (o 11 &I 5 a O) 4J C) W C a a CO CO 0 t co 139.3 r m X Q N A O) 126.0 I M '• 0N) (O 00)) 07 0) o . 0 0D N co t0 W 0 0 3 d 0) 0) 0) Pass / Fail Wall E North Wall E North' Notes anmsio iva a.. 3d) Al!SuG JI 0 13 0 0 7 coo O 0 Wo3 uogona;suoO ou!laeyy T D cn Z 0 CO 0 0 0 uO! S ae}sueal g -13 0. CD 0 Z 0 60 4) suosaed •S We!!I!AA 600Z/81411 w. . N 0 00 0 o 0 y Ei O co V• O P COCN CD 7 ..F c W 0 IC C CD 00 •uiWpV •isuo3 ▪ g. c n O Joloadsui peal 'Ilene Jo eoei Woaj stas110 .Z •i6u3 iuepisaa Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 0 7 03 C7 3O O 73 Al C 0 0 (D O • m Z _o c 3c. 3 N (D O (D Q. Q nca N X Q n A W co f W. N C i 0 J AA" c cnn 7 W � W m 0 o ...a O o 3 A � W �O.► O W d 0 0 0 v m O (71 0 MOJJO 1 1S!oW tuaOaa. 0 0 hT 0 l 11 :aoloeaiuoo Woo uonon.ilsuo0 ou!la 0 CD oad amei Moe uo!W;S ie sueal'S (D CD a W suosaed •S We!II!M 0 0) 6002/0Z/L L CD 4 CD cD w � a, 0 7o Cr 3O 0 O 0 `< 0 144 A W Test # O O O 01 (71 O Station j a) Offset vl is 1mG) al io -, CD a 5 m c Cn `G CD 73 0 CD . 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type O 0) O in -0 :-- Cr V N rn V 11 25 . -a 0) W w W 0 1Z5 91 • CO CO 0 o 139.3 (0 is w w x Q 123.8 w in m _ 9)) io " 9 io K n X O, (0 (VO W %Comp. Pass / Fail Notes Pass Pass Wall E North Wall E North 1S!oW tuaOaa. 0 0 hT 0 l 11 :aoloeaiuoo Woo uonon.ilsuo0 ou!la 0 CD oad amei Moe uo!W;S ie sueal'S (D CD a W suosaed •S We!II!M 0 0) 6002/0Z/L L CD 4 CD cD w � a, 0 7o Cr 3O 0 O 0 `< 0 uiwpd asuo3 0 O 0) 0 O 9L919# OSP£ JelxoJl 'L :s peLuej iopadsui peal 'j6u3 )uapise O C O n c z c 3 0 CD C) J J A G) 0 0 w J 0 0 m' 0 cr 0 C) O 0 0) 0 0 co O Q 0 0 0 W w N 0 O w 0 W in (M0JJo9 !BAWD „P/I. 6 C) O D 0) 0. O m c N CD C1 x 0 (00 Cr Cr O 0 d 0 0 O 3 0 0 i • Ue0Ja. :ioloeatuo3 Woo uoi;on.jsuo3 ouvJa 0) 0 0 0 302J alel Moe uoljels iejsueil 'R 6uuo 0 CD 0 z O A (0 W CD Cn CD a 0 Co uMOJ9 Jasew 600Z/£Z/1. 1. (0 0 3 CD -. • - w ti O CM Co' itO O 0 0 bm .uuluaa A 0) A 0) Test # 01 + 5+25 Station N 12' Offset rn CO rn CD m0 FD CD < ((D 11 "II (D -0 0 CD . 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type 10.6 0)i r Q N Cn W 0) co Ca y CD .. Q O n O Cr co co 0 r w ap ex)x 139.3 K l— p) 0) N CT W 1 125.1 1126.9 -i C) N .. 0N) (O 0) O x 1 98.7 CD CO 0) \0 0 n 0 3 T VT Pass Pass V 0) Cn N Wall E North Wall E North Notes i • Ue0Ja. :ioloeatuo3 Woo uoi;on.jsuo3 ouvJa 0) 0 0 0 302J alel Moe uoljels iejsueil 'R 6uuo 0 CD 0 z O A (0 W CD Cn CD a 0 Co uMOJ9 Jasew 600Z/£Z/1. 1. (0 0 3 CD -. • - w ti O CM Co' itO O 0 0 bm .uuluaa 0 O N C) 0 Jopedsul peal 'llem;o 00e1 WOJI s;as11O 'Z •J6u3 Iuapisaa Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 O 0 0 CD z 3 is co 0 A 2 G) 01 0) CD w 0 1 0 co 0 cn N n 0 3 0) O. O co 0 a 0 N W O 0 G-7.1 N co 0 O W O in (MoJ1og IaneJO .17/1 n 0 0) 0 0 rn c co 0 CD N 0) 0 J CJ1 O 61 6�D n O 3 o, 0 co co !• u30J9. 11519. YAIRilltereaj :Jo2oaJ1uo3 W03 uogona;suo3 oullJa d T D z 0 oat! a)le-1 Moe 0 UORB1S Ja;sue it +g co 0 z 0 CD W umoJg aaseW 6002/bZ/L L 00 0 Us Vt O D C z rn 00o _ A 03 _ A V -1 O Ci) + CJt Station 4+75 Offset 15' 167.091 m� b Fr-, a co• 0) 717 = = m CD c0"' 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow O O) O CD O) CT 6.5 01mrn ma7' ' rn w rn On w 13 a Cr CO cri o CO t 139.3 r m W X Cr N co O Test 125.8 126.9 n (0nX) 98.5 o CO (] P o 3 IP Pass Pass / Fail Pass Wall E North Notes Wall E North !• u30J9. 11519. YAIRilltereaj :Jo2oaJ1uo3 W03 uogona;suo3 oullJa d T D z 0 oat! a)le-1 Moe 0 UORB1S Ja;sue it +g co 0 z 0 CD W umoJg aaseW 6002/bZ/L L 00 0 Us Vt O D C z rn 00o .uiwpv 11suo3 T (D 1) O a C 0 O Cf O Joloadsul peal •Ilene;o ape; WOJ; slas};O •Z •J6u3 luapisab 9L919# OSP£ Jelx0J1 •1 :s){Jewaa O 0 (79 Proctor/Curve Number: KC -09-1415 (1 1/4"Gravel Borrow B-231) n O m 0 m v C. 0 7 0 0 3 -a C) 0 CD 0 Q O N W 00 W N 1D n O O m J G) 0 0 1 1 CO () 30 0 0 m C CA CD a Kc 0 SCD (Si N -13 O (D 0 3 O 0 0 in .•W qua Jo. LIMUZIEMYSIT :Jo1oeJtuo3 woo uoi;prupuo3 oullaa O1 -n z O 0 0. co UMOJB JOSBIAI oaa amei mos 0 uoi;eig as;sued g (3. 0 z 9 0 0) Fri W 0 N 0 O 'J A -11 U 0 0_ • 2. IJ C • O D J ▪ IJ P .0 0 — -3 J 0 0 — 0 1 149 Test # 5+80 5+20 Station 0) 0 N CD J a) (O co J a) 53 co Grade/ Elev. T = �- ((D 0 0 "' 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type 0 rn 0 Oo) in Q rn N ill N '-4 - y (D .. 0_ co O rn O 00 73 � • N Ut v a. ° r w L 139.3 K r x v 125.4 126.7 0 co NJ 128.1 LU 0 X 1 - (13 CO io c 0 3 73 Pass Pass Pass / Fail Wall E North Wall E North Notes .•W qua Jo. LIMUZIEMYSIT :Jo1oeJtuo3 woo uoi;prupuo3 oullaa O1 -n z O 0 0. co UMOJB JOSBIAI oaa amei mos 0 uoi;eig as;sued g (3. 0 z 9 0 0) Fri W 0 N 0 O 'J A -11 U 0 0_ • 2. IJ C • O D J ▪ IJ P .0 0 — -3 J 0 0 — ulwpy 'ISUO3 T V (IT 0 0) n 0 Jopadsui peal 'Ilene to Goal WOJI s;Gsll0 'Z •J6u3 ivapisaa 9L9I.9# 0sb£ Jaixo.il l.:s>iJeweJ v 0 co 0 f0 Proctor/Curve Number: KC -09-1415 (1 114"Gravel Borrow 8-231) 0 0 N 0 m Q 0 n 0 O 3 3 ) • N o.N O • m C • cn a n O x 4.W O O ID 6 C1 — W N CD t1 -a 01 O N 7 Ca 13 O w 01 �D m :a 0 3 72)c 0 co w 0 1 0 tin o tuaOJa. :Jo1oeatuo0 Woo uoi;ons;suo0 ou!IJa 0 0 oat! nno8 0 UOI1B1S aajsue.11'8 m o D o' 9) o Z Z 0 0 Xl A CO A s GJ CD N a 0 CO UMOJB JaseIN c co -24 • g CD rD CO -41 w o o c o o' ( cn N o f s Test # 6+08.07 5+50 Station 10' 0 Offset 172.02 172.02 Grade» Elev. 11 11 = cn 'G CD 13 0 CD 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type o 0) 0 rn Or— Q' in in Nm ,-. O. 6.0 6.0 O -o 0n a 01 v 0 v o r 139.3 139.3 Kr 0)0) x Q 124.8 N GJ io co » • N 128.11 128.1 K v o x -4 CD CD O 0 3 Pass Pass Pass / Fail Wall E North Wall E North Notes tin o tuaOJa. :Jo1oeatuo0 Woo uoi;ons;suo0 ou!IJa 0 0 oat! nno8 0 UOI1B1S aajsue.11'8 m o D o' 9) o Z Z 0 0 Xl A CO A s GJ CD N a 0 CO UMOJB JaseIN c co -24 • g CD rD CO -41 w o o c o o' •uiwpy •isuo3 0 0 0 iopedsul peal Temp aoel woJ; s;asnO 'Z �6u3 ivapisaii 9L969# OSP£ JOIXOJi •I.:s31jewai O 0 0 0 n z c Q CD c) O N J Gi CO 0 1 cO co N W --I 0 0 0 n 0 73 0) 0 0 CD 5 0 0. O W 0 0 W W N In O n O c3 0 Qi m J (MoJJo8 lane.i0 ..b/I. n 0 3 0 9- 0 m c (D a X n N N O 01 0) 0 0 3 ci O N d MEriirig :Jo1oaJ1uo0 woo uononJ;suoa ouilaa d CD 9- oaa Mob uol;els ie sued g m a D 0' cn 0 z z 0 2 co J UMOJB JaseW C7 CD • to 3 ^ 7,7 0� 03 cr O 0 `2 0. 199 'cca o 0 aC Cir+ ® I< —1 93 0 -A -A w Test # 6+08.07 5+50 Station J N Offset 173.02 v w O N Grade/ Elev. 11 11 -I U) '< 0 (D r. 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type -." 0 b) 0 b) 0r 0) r Q w 6 w N d o 2. q rnrn w al co 01 co 0 ° t CA CD W CA3 CD Ca E 6— D) X Cr rn J w CDN 4 ONi to iv co c0 N 0 100.0 co ti 0) O 0 0 3 71 co N N Pass I -ii so D) Vl _ cn Wall E North] Wall E North] Notes d MEriirig :Jo1oaJ1uo0 woo uononJ;suoa ouilaa d CD 9- oaa Mob uol;els ie sued g m a D 0' cn 0 z z 0 2 co J UMOJB JaseW C7 CD • to 3 ^ 7,7 0� 03 cr O 0 `2 0. 199 'cca o 0 aC Cir+ ® I< —1 93 0 •u!WPV '1SUOO T m -u m 0 0 Joioadsui peal Tem jO a3ei WOJJ SIMS3IO •Z •J6u3 wapisad 9PZ8£# ObtV£ JalxoJl • .:sveweE! �6u j loafoJd B n o 0 3 vn 1 m z m Z 4 c cD 0 s uCi co aCL CD n w x ocQ m cn :J 1 ^ N C fA A N 7 0 W .13 A O o m ci o c " 3 110 N c N 0 0 0 a 0 0 :J pin iu. .10. Ld d) iii -0 :Joioeiiuoo woo uo!tanJtsuoO ou!lie D) suosaed 'S Weill!M 0 co w oeu OMB, M09 uoletg iejsueJj'g 0 CD' 0 Z 9 CO W 0 0 CO ccnn rn cn 01 Test # rn 0 rn 0 Station o 8' Offset w in CCaa in Grade/ Elev. _1 11 _ VI '< 0 CD ^' 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Material Type 0 0 ow- cn -.cn ) A T N (D .tea rn f rn -1.V TO0 mt mt C.” CO C.n CO o A co ca W r x Cr F rn N �) W ;CO N — v A v A X 0 • 50 - v \o 0 o 0 3 73 w N Pass ,iCO co Al co Wall E North Wall E North Notes :J pin iu. .10. Ld d) iii -0 :Joioeiiuoo woo uo!tanJtsuoO ou!lie D) suosaed 'S Weill!M 0 co w oeu OMB, M09 uoletg iejsueJj'g 0 CD' 0 Z 9 CO W 0 0 CO King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 103 Date: 12-15-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 10:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:30am I observed CTI has stopped the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E1+30 to approximately Station E2+70 due to a significant rain event last night and predicted rain in the forecast for today. 8:OOam I visually inspected Wall "E" North and South for erosion control. I noticed no significant signs of any damage to the Project Site at these locations 9:OOam 1 observed Ness Crane Crew has employed a 300 Ton Crane to set B-4 Base Panel at Waste Water / Sanitary Sewer Vault located North of the Transfer Station. 10:OOam CTI has shut down their operations for the day. 10:30am I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 103 Date: 12-15-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 10:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes No X b Signed 4 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 102 Date: 12-14-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:OOam Time Work Stopped: 3:OOpm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 X 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 7:OOam I arrived at the Project Site. 7:10am I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E1+30 to approximately Station E2+70. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and an off road haul truck to dump and spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 7:15am I was informed by the CTI Supervisor that an apprentice operator has been employed today to operate their CS453 Steel Drum Vibratory Roller for compacting embankment material behind Wall "E" North. 7:45am I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material at Wall "E" North. The embankment material is being loaded into the off road trucks using a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station.. 8:25am CTI has started to dump, spread, and compact embankment material at Wall "E" South at Station E1+30 to Station E2+70. I observed that CTI has started placing Oversize Rocks 25 feet (West) from the Face of Wall "E" South. CTI has employed one off road haul truck to transport and dump the Oversize Rocks, a Hitachi 270 excavator to place the rocks and spread the embankment material, and a Caterpillar CS453 Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550 plate compactor to compact the material. 9:30am I noticed CTI's Hitachi 450 Excavator has struck and bent Settlement Plate #7. I observed CTI carefully excavate around the Settlement Plate using their Hitachi 270 excavator. No apparent damage was done to the base of the Settlement Plate. I observed CTI remove the bent section of pipe and install a new section of pipe and coupler and then mark the pipe with red tape. They will now fill with embankment material around the plate and compact the material using their WP1550 walk behind plate compactor. 12:05pm CTI has now dumped, spread, and compacted 5 off road haul truck loads of embankment material at Wall "E" North from Station E1+30 to Station E2+70.. 1:35pm I observed CTI has employed their Hitachi 270 Excavator to place embankment material around Settlement Plates #11, 10, 9, and 8. They will now King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Report No: 102 Date: 12-14-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:OOam Time Work Stopped: 3:OOpm compact the material using a walk behind WP1550 plate compactor. 2:OOpm General Note: I observed CTI has installed and marked with red tape, 7' Settlement Plate pipe extensions at Settlement Plates #9 and #8. 2:45pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to check compaction of the embankment material on Tuesday, 15 December, at 10:OOam. 2:50pm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 11 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" South at Station E1+30 to Station E2+70. 3:OOpm I departed the Project Site. 4:OOpm CTI has shut down their operations for the day. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 102 Date: 12-14-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:OOam Time Work Stopped: 3:OOpm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed t4 I King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 101 Date: 12-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 X 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E3+30 to approximately Station E6+70. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and an off road haul truck to dump and spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 7:05am I was informed by the CTI Supervisor that an apprentice operator has been employed today to operate their CS453 Steel Drum Vibratory Roller for compacting embankment material behind Wall "E" North. 7:45am I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material at Wall "E" North. The embankment material is being loaded into the off road trucks using a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station.. 8:25am CTI has started to dump, spread, and compact embankment material at Wall "E" North at Station E3+30 to Station E6+70. I observed that CTI has started placing the embankment material 2 feet (West) from the Face of Wall "E" North at the aforementioned locations. CTI has employed two off road haul trucks to transport and dump the material, a D6N Dozer to spread the material, and a Caterpillar CS453 Vibratory Steel Drum Roller to compact the material. 10:20am William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E4+10(9.4% moisture content at 98.3 % compaction) and at Station E3+50 (10.9% moisture content at 91.2% compaction) Sub grade elevations for these compaction tests were at 179.9 feet. 12:05pm CTI has now dumped, spread, and compacted 41 off road haul truck loads of embankment material at Wall "E" North from Station E3+30 to Station E6+70. 2:20pm William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material, ( Primarily Pure Sand) at Station E5+25 (Moisture Content at 12.1% and Compaction at 98.9%) Station E6+10 (Moisture Content at 12.5% and Compaction at 97.4%) Sub grade elevations for these compaction tests were at 180.9 feet respectively. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 101 Date: 12-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 2:35pm I observed CTI has employed their Hitachi 270 Excavator to place embankment material around Settlement Plates #11, 10, 9, and 8. They will now compact the material using a walk behind WP1550 plate compactor. 2:45pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to check compaction of the embankment material on Monday, 14 December, at 10:OOam. 3:OOpm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 91 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+70. 3:30pm I departed the Project Site. 4:OOpm CTI has shut down their operations for the day. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 101 Date: 12-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed ' f King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 100 Date: 12-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday x Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear x Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 x 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to approximately Station E6+70. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and an off road haul truck to dump and spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 7:OOam I was informed by the CTI Supervisor that an apprentice operator has been employed today to operate their CS453 Steel Drum Vibratory Roller for compacting embankment material behind Wall "E" North. 8:OOam I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material at Wall "E" North. The embankment material is being loaded into the off road trucks using a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station.. 8:25am CTI has started to dump, spread, and compact embankment material at Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+70. I observed that CTI has started placing the embankment material 2 feet (West) from the Face of Wall "E" North at the aforementioned locations. CTI has employed two off road haul trucks -to transport and dump the material, a D6N Dozer to spread the material, and a Caterpillar CS453 Vibratory Steel Drum Roller to compact the material. I also observed that CTI is using their walk behind plate compactor to compact the material at the face of the wall.. 9:20am William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E5+75(11.1% moisture content at 94.0 % compaction) and at Station E6+60 (9.0% moisture content at 90.0% compaction) Sub grade elevations for these compaction tests were at 176.0 feet. 12:05pm CTI has now dumped, spread, and compacted 41 off road haul truck loads of embankment material at Wall "E" North from Station E4+30 to Station E6+70. 2:20pm William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E4+60 (Moisture Content at 7.6% and Compaction at 93.2%) Station E6+00 (Moisture Content at 9.1% and Compaction at 99.9%) Sub grade elevations for these King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Report No: 100 Date: 12-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm compaction tests were at 177 feet respectively. 2:25pm I observed CTI has employed their Hitachi 270 Excavator to place embankment material around Settlement Plates #11, 10, 9, and 8. They will now compact the material using a walk behind WP1550 plate compactor. 2:35pm I scheduled William Parsons from KCML to check compaction of the embankment material on Friday, 11 December, at 10:OOam. 3:OOpm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 77 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+70. 3:30pm I departed the Project Site. 4:OOpm CTI has shut down their operations for the day. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 100 Date: 12-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed ,/ Fax (206)296-0179 12/10/2009 William S. Parsons Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station a3 erlino Construction.Com Contractor: Notes z W co z W 03 zda WEA' _ cc m Q .-„z,: a (n co Fi (CLL CL Pass Pass Pass Pass a E o U O 96.5 a) vi — rn co rn iX O U 2 130.5 M T 132.0 1 N N T 75 i— a) N (O N T N N ..- a) 4 —' 144.6 1 (O (.0 144.6 CO NI- , -- r --It ,i - It O N c0 N co a) u) I- h O Q U O T N- T - 0o (o Q) cO - y LL :- a) a) a) r. d: cV • ca JQ co r- co - co - in Material Type Native Native ro z Native 48 a a >, Cf F— _ it _ it _ it if N .O > toa) UW O aa; .- O 0 r 01 n 71) O N N N Station '4 ( o (D 0 M 1.5'SE Test # d' (0 T Ln (O T (o CO T N- (o T Compaction Eq. Used: BOMAG BW213D SDV 0 (0 O c 0 4. 0 ar 0) N r M O N 0 O t a) crs c 0 0 0 O U 0 U Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets for test from face of wall. Lead Inspector N u- Const. Admin. VI Laying / Deploying #55 Geo Grid on op of Refuse Material — Bid Item 1 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 099 Date: 12-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 X 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to approximately Station E6+82. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and an off road haul truck to dump and spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 7:10am I was informed by the CTI Supervisor that an apprentice operator has been employed today to operate their CS453 Steel Drum Vibratory Roller for compacting embankment material behind Wall "E" North. 8:10am I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material at Wall "E" North. The embankment material is being loaded into the off road trucks using a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station.. 8:25am CTI has started to dump, spread, and compact embankment material at Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. I observed that CTI has started placing the embankment material 2 feet (West) from the Face of Wall "E" North at the aforementioned locations. CTI has employed two off road haul trucks to transport and dump the material, a D6N Dozer to spread the material, and a Caterpillar CS453 Vibratory Steel Drum Roller to compact the material. I also observed that CTI is using their walk behind plate compactor to compact the material at the face of the wall.. 10:20 William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E5+75(11.1% moisture content at 94.0 % compaction) and at Station E6+60 (9.0% moisture content at 90.0% compaction) Elevation for these compaction tests were at 176.0 feet. 12:OOpm CTI has now dumped, spread, and compacted 38 off road haul truck loads of embankment material at Wall "E" North from Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. 12:05pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to check compaction of the placed embankment material and obtain a representative sample for Proctor Evaluation and grain size distribution this afternoon 9 December 09, at 2:OOpm. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 099 Date: 12-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 2:20pm William Parsons from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E4+60 and at Station E6+00. Compaction and moisture content to be determined after lab results for grain size distribution which should be completed by 10 December 2009. Sub grade elevations for these compaction tests were at 176 feet. 2:25pm I observed CTI has employed their Hitachi 270 Excavator to place embankment material around Settlement Plates #11, 10, 9, and 8. They will now compact the material using a walk behind WP1550 plate compactor. 3:OOpm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 65 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. 3:30pm I departed the Project Site. 4:OOpm CTI has shut down their operations for the day. i km King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 099 Date: 12-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed 0 P 2. — LLi ,c r 7 r • ado C C rJ f i — rJ r • = L a 0 0 O T y as c O U• F'' oL 0 • c 0. a) William S. Parsons N iii m N m N I— Project No.: Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station 0 z 1 Merlino Construction Com Notes z W z W z W z W — n 3 Q Vii Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Q. E O U e 0 89.9 94.0 100.0 93.2 94.9 Corr. Max. 130.5 125.5 130.1 129.2 N O Test 117.3 118.0 130.1 120.4 104.1 X (O (0 CO co.o ((g't(Es��4o r 4t N CO r) O 0 CO I- (.0 (O 0 0 L"8 I.'L 'JJoo Field Test 9.0 11.1 9.1 7.6 16.2 .n .- Lq (0 Up UD LO J Q r r Material Type Native Native Native Native Native Sect. Type Fill Fill Fill Fill Cut O> p 0 0 0 E2 16 C) W ,- *' CV Qr r N 711 CO N .- N O Station 6+60 5+75 6+00 4+60 SW CORNE' O O r N co U) (n CO (O (0 (O 0 r . r r r M co 0 0 0) 0 0 r, V 0 N (0 0 N w N y 0 coO O 0, L O 0 N o M N 0 O N 2 C 0 cciU a E O 0 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets for test #159-#162 from face of wall. Lead Inspector 0 U N U C Do 2 0 a a) LL Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 098 Date: 12-08-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday x Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear x Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 X 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to approximately Station E5+36. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and a Hitachi 270 Excavator to spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 8:OOam I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material that is being loaded with a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station.. 8:05am CTI has started to dump, spread, and compact embankment material at Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. I observed that CTI has started placing the embankment material 2 feet (West) from the Face of Wall "E" North at the aforementioned locations. CTI has employed their off road haul truck to transport and dump material, a D6N Dozer to spread the material, and a Caterpillar CS453 Vibratory Roller to compact the material. I also observe CTI is using their walk behind plate compactor to compact the material at the face of the wall. 10:15am I noticed CTI is now placing oversize rocks behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to approximately Station E5+36.They will now place embankment material around the oversize rocks and compact the material using a walk behind WP 1550D plate compactor. 11:20 Maser Brown from KCML arrives at the Project Site to perform compaction testing of the compacted embankment material at Station E4+50(13% moisture content at 96.5 % compaction) and at Station E5+50 (10% moisture Content at 93.9% compaction) Elevation for these compaction tests were at 175 feet. 12:OOpm CTI has now dumped, spread, and compacted 40 off road haul truck loads of embankment material at Wall "E" North from Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. 12:30pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to check compaction of the placed embankment material and obtain a representative sample for Proctor Evaluation tomorrow morning 9 December 09, at 9:OOam. 3:OOpm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 65 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+30 to Station E6+82. rIP King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 098 Date: 12-08-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 3:30pm I departed the Project Site. 4:OOpm CTI has shut down their operations for the day. • La King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 098 Date: 12-08-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 7:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed 51)-- tqlm----- co co 00 m 3 0 A> 0 r. 3 CL n 0 3 v w 0 ho 0 to 0 A) Irl Z 0 Sunowdwoj pur 7uauni q a O >‘ tiv Q� = V F. v cl cc E 0 ea 0 w 7 174 >, w t• - O 0 00 0 C 'cq a) 05 e cJ cU Maser Brown & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec U a) 0 CL V c E O U c o Construc Contractor: Notes w c w Pass / Fail Pass Pass % Comp. LO V a) N 0) U� M N N F_ N IP N ID X J CO T (D T 4# 0 Li) U) co t0 • .`. a 0p U M (0 co (: 'O "' N.. O Na) () *- -ID -ID w Jp In .- to - Material Type F. RS Z ca Z tja a) >, co H _ U. LL 411 > W 0 r 0 r- = O N N c - 71 c o (r+) ( n ( v to U) O (o O 0 "t; a) U) N Co) 1a 0 M 0 O .c Q) 2 0 U (6 a 0 U rn cc o_ i •m •0 a a d a.0 0 Remarks: 1. Troxler 3450 #61676 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector • Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 097 Date: 12-07-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X. Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 X 32-55 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:OOam I observed CTI has begun the task of placing embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+36 to approximately Station E5+36. They have employed a Caterpillar D6N Dozer and a Hitachi 270 Excavator to spread the embankment material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts and compact the lifts using both a Vibratory Steel Drum Roller and a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor to compact each lift placement. 8:OOam I noticed CTI is using their John Deere 350 Off Road Haul Truck to transport and off load the embankment material that is being loaded with a Hitachi 450 Excavator at the embankment stockpile located West of the Transfer Station. 10:OOam I noticed CTI is now placing oversize rocks behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+36 to approximately Station E5+36.They will now place embankment material around the oversize rocks and compact the material using a walk behind WP1550D plate compactor. 11:OOam CTI is now placing embankment material above the oversize rocks using their D6N dozer to spread the material in loose 8 to 10 inch lifts above the oversize rocks. They will compact the placed embankment material lifts using their Bomag Vibratory Steel Drum Roller. 12:30pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab arrived on the Project Site and will check compaction of the placed embankment material and obtain a representative sample for Proctor Evaluation tomorrow morning 8 December 09, at 9:OOam 2:30pm I observed CTI has placed and compacted 15 off road haul truck loads of embankment material behind Wall "E" North at Station E4+36 to Station E5+36. 2:35pm I departed the Project Site 4:30pm CTI has shut down their operations for the day King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 097 Date: 12-07-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Signed �•- b2- King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 096 Date: 12-04-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North and South on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E6+30 to E6+82 is 173.50 at Wall "E" North and from Station E0+00 to E0+30 at Wall "E" South the grade elevation is 208.48 CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 120 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 8:30am I observed True North survey crew installing 12 Settlement Plates at the East Slope embankment. The Settlement Plates are being installed approximately 50 feet West of the MSE Wall "E" parallel with the face of wall. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #55 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E6+30 to Station E6+82 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:30am I observed CTI has completed installing 50 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E6+30 to Station E6+82 at a 1% slope. 10:45am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:05am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/z" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:25pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. • King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 096 Date: 12-04-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 12:OOpm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #55 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E0+00 to Station E0+30. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:30pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 30 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E0+00 to Station E0+30 at a 5.07% slope. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. 1a King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 096 Date: 12-04-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X g. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Signed 0(64061-61.2--t___ N o E N U a) Q King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 095 Date: 12-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear X Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:1 Sam I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E6+08.07 to E6+82 is 173.50 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 120 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #55 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E6+08.07 to Station E6+82 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:30am I observed CTI has completed installing 50 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E6+08.07 to Station E6+52. 10:45am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:O5am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 ''Y2" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:25pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:OOpm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #55 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E6+52 to Station E6+82. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:30pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 72 lineal foot section of MSE King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 095 Date: 12-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Geo -Grid Wall at Station E6+08.07 to Station E6+82. 1:35pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E6+00, Elevation 173.50 (97.0% compaction @ 5.4 % moisture) and at Station E6+60, Elevation 173.50 (99.1 % compaction @ 5.7% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 125.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 095 Date: 12-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes No X g. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons from King County Materials Lab Signed 1t/ King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 094 Date: 12-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear x Partly Cloudy Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+70 to E6+82 is 173.02 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 120 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 8:45am Joe Karahuta from KCML arrived on the Project Site to obtain a representative sample of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill for frequency grain size distribution analysis. CTI as of today, has placed approximately 1850 cubic yards of Type #17 Gravel Wall Backfill material for constructing Wa11 "E" North. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E5+70. to Station E6+30 and type #55 matting at Station E6+30 to E6+70 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:30am I observed CTI has completed installing 60 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+70 to Station E6+30. 10:45am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:05am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/2" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:25pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% • King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 094 Date: 12-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station compaction at each lift placement. 12:OOpm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+70 to Station E6+30 and type #55 Geo Grid matting from Station E6+30 to E6+70. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:30pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 112 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+70 to Station E6+82. 1:35pm Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+50, Elevation 173.02 (96.6% compaction @ 5.5 % moisture) and at Station E6+08.07 Elevation 173.02 (99.0 % compaction @ 5.3% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 125.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:15pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Thursday afternoon, 3 December, 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. 01. 044 • King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 4 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 094 Date: 12-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed gip 60.4.441."---- King County Dept. of Transportation Materials Laboratory Aggregate Test Data 155 Monroe Ave. NE, Bldg D Renton, WA 98056-4199 Phone: 206.296.7709 Fax: 206.296.01 79 Project: Bow Lake Transfer Station Type of Material: Gravel Borrow Purpose of Sample: Assurance Sampled At Protect Site Stockpile Name and Location of Source: CTI Project Number. R49413 Lab Sample Number. KC -09-1464 Date Sampled: 1212/09 Sampled By: JK Total Weight: 14.33 kg Sieve Retained Weight Required ,Spec. Percent 'Passing' Percent Fractured 4" 0.00 100 100 17 2" 0.00 75-100 100 11/2" 0.00 100 1" 0.00 #200 Wash 100 3/4" 0.23 #200 98 5.0 Max 5/8" 1.33 91 1/2" 3.06 79 3/8" 4.67 67 1/4" 5.48 62 #4 6.02 50-80 58 Fract. Wt. Avg. + #4: Fracture Spec: Dust Ratio: Dust Ratio Spec: Sand Equlvalent(AASHTO T176): SE Spec: Pit #: 8-231 Subsample Weight: 539.5 g Sieve Retained Required Percelit Weight' i Spec. Passiri}g Percent' Fractured #10 108.3 46 #40 381.2 30.0 Max 17 #200 Wash (AASHTO T11A): Mass Before: 5146.5 g Mass After: 5072.0 g #200 5.0 Max 1.4 Remarks: Ref: (AASHTO T2, T11(A), T27, T176, T248, TP61) 83 Earthwork 16/32 Table 6 Gravel Borrow. 50 Min X meets Material specifications. does not meet Reviewed By: Approved for Distribution By: Inspector Remarks: 1Z 9/0 Materials Engineer 4•7 Date: 12/3/09 Tested By Tara Pfaff Distribution: Date(s): To: # Cotes 1 MOW 1 1 Bow Lake Transfer Station.xls Resident Engineer Project Engineer Const Admin. Contractor Pit Log Mat Lab File Fax Fax 3 Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station Maser Brown Gary Merlino Construction Company, Inc. Contractor: Notes Wall E North Wall E North Pass / Fail Pass Pass 'dwo3 % (o • 0) O O F. a) a) 0 ON N rn al 0 el o 1— - V. Lab Max 139.3 139.3 li o) a) t1') to 0 Q M M 0 0 (0 c•0 U — V)0 a>to M • ii. I— to tri .� co co co 0 a O O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow a) "CI> O O W N- O N _ ( •-- N Station 5+50 6+08.07 Test # 153 154 Proctor/Curve Number. KC -09-1415 (1 1/4"Gravel Borrow B-231) Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3450 #61676 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. 0 2 0) 0 William S. Parsons Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station lC Merlino Construction Com as Contractor: .71 Notes Wall E North Wall E North Pass / Fail Pass Pass a E U O o rn — rn • X U cG N N N O (O N M (6 N CM Jo X co as Ch Cr) ai ai * 0 co co in 10 ` a. o U O '. (O c0 IIF-- LO u() .•.: J O cO co O O Material Type 1 1/4''- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow u) H =rif _ 433 j al a) W in Fr) ri 0) n = 0 O co b,-- Station o (O +O( ( co Test # 155 156 O V m E O as m M O c o1 - is a °) a� M Y 1 as O N O • s � y W • c c O O j 0 a E 0 U 1/4" Gravel Bo 0 5 •0 2 0 U Project Mngr. Resident Engr. Lead Inspector 0 a) V 0 N (0 N 0 N King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 093 Date: 12-01-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+50 to E6+70 is 172.02 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 120 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E5+25.50 to Station E5+95.30 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 60 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+50 to Station E6+20. 10:40am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:10am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 'h" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:40pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:OOpm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+50 to Station E6+30 and type #55 Geo Grid matting from Station E6+30 to E6+70. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 093 Date: 12-01-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 1:30pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 120 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+50 to Station E6+70. 1:35pm Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+50, Elevation 172.02 (96.7% compaction @ 7.6 % moisture) and at Station E6+08.07 Elevation 172.02 (97.4 % compaction @ 5.5% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:15pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Wednesday afternoon, 2 December, 2009.. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 093 Date: 12-01-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed 9—T m O c U- G r r 7 vi ., J o r C c p _ 1(.! q Ci : p c Lei J >1 to CD 0 c Q 0 0 0 0 5 � id o " DO O 5. ai. N _y Ecd 5 0 Maser Brown > co o M 0) 0 z a) 0 d Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station erlino Construction Com 0 U o fQ O C d 0 a) O z Wall E North 1 Wall E North Pass / Fail Pass Pass a E U O tNI- rn rn OO06 N cc' N Test 123.9 124.8 X M CO 2 M M M r U) 0 �!) Q O 0 0 co O co m ii 1-- i. (.ri .o.: co .gip. 0 CD 0 Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow .: 0 0 0. U) H = _ W v > O N 4% N 5 W v- O N .r 42 0 0 0 Station 5+50 r, 0 00 + (0 Test # 151 152 1 O d i R o R Ea. '- r o r U W tG 0 0. a Co o c a o r V N 0 M r eaO 3 O N O oW c O O j V Q a E O oO w 0 U 1 1/4"Gravel Borrow B-231) Proctor/Curve Number: KC -09-1415 Remarks: 1. Troxler 3450 #61676 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector Const. Admin. 111 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 092 Date: 11-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+25.50 to E6+30 is 169.18 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 110 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E5+25.50 to Station E5+95.30 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 70 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+25.50 to Station E5+95.50. 10:40am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:20am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 ''h" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:50pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:10pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+95.30 to Station E6+30 and type #55 Geo Grid matting from Station E6+30 to E6+55. I observed the CTI crew is using the same r� w King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 092 Date: 11-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:30pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 105 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+25.50 to the angle point at Station E6+30. 1:45pm Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+20, Elevation 169.18 (98.8% compaction @ 5.2 % moisture) and at Station E5+80, Elevation 169.18 (97.9 % compaction @ 6.1% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 125.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:25pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Tuesday afternoon, 1 December, 2009. 2:30pm I attended the weekly Staff Meeting conducted by KPFF. 3:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 092 Date: 11-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 3:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed Co C6 9, 2C d _ O U C CD •L g = CD = 11/30/2009 Maser Brown T Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station 0 0 erlino Construction Com Contractor: 2 a) Notes Wall E North Wall E North I Pass / Fail Pass Pass Q E O U 0 0) cd 0) rn 0 ON U T 128.1 Test 126.7 (0 N .-- _o X M _o co c0 0) J 139.3 U N- I 0 N. 8O Q U O c0 6.0 co (Ni a) w • LI" LL� N ( • X)...: C0 J O C7 (0 O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow .j a) U a (n i— - LL - it Grade/ Elev. 169.18 ai CD Offset 15' in T Station 5+20 5+80 � ct I— 150 V to 0. E 0 U co a 0 in r a co 5�. .1L C.) N a� D w 0 co 0 O U a 0 0 v Remarks: 1. Troxler 3450 #61676 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector O co0 0 0 U 7 0 O a 0 Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 091 Date: 11-25-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+45.50 to E6+55 is 169.18 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 110 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E5+45 to Station E5+95.30 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:30am I observed CTI has completed installing 50 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+45.50 to Station E5+95.50. 11:OOam I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:20am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 'h" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:35pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+85.30 to Station E6+30 and type #55 Geo Grid matting from Station E6+30 to E6+55. I observed the CTI crew is using the same King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 091 Date: 11.-25-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:OOpm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 105 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+45.50 to the angle point at Station E6+55. 2:25pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Monday afternoon, 30 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 091 Date: 11-25-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed /61P--/aLto_ King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 090 Date: 11-24-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+45.50 to E6+30.07 is 167.09 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:10am CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 118 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E5+45 to Station E5+95.30 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:30am I observed CTI has completed installing 50 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+45.50 to Station E5+95.30. 10:35am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:35pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+85.30 to Station E6+30.07 I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. Jr 4. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 090 Date: 11-24-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 105 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+45.50 to the angle point at Station E6+30.07. 2:25pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Monday afternoon, 30 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. AP King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 090 Date: 11-24-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed bfre--1444,,e.t..,- King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 089 Date: 11.-23-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast x Fog Rain x TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:25am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+25.25 to E6+30.07 is 166.09 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:25am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 118 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E25+25 to Station E5+85.30 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 60 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+25.25 to Station E5+85.30. 10:35am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:45am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 Y2" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:35pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+85.30 to Station E6+30.07 I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 089 Date: 11-23-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 1:05pm Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+25, Elevation 166.90 (98.6% compaction @ 6.5% moisture) and at Station E5+75, Elevation 166.90 (98.7 % compaction @ 6.2% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 125.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 105 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+25.25 to the angle point at Station E6+30.07. 2:25pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Tuesday afternoon, 24 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 089 Date: 11-23-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab Signed &-Plai,„,.._, l' w King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 088 Date: 11-20-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E5+17.25 to E6+08.07 is 165.09 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:15am CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 118 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 8:45am Joe Karahuta from KCML arrived on the Project Site to obtain a representative sample of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill for frequency grain size distribution analysis. 9:05am I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E17+25 to Station E5+50 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 60 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E5+17.25 to Station E5+68. 10:50am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:45am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/2" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:25pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 088 Date: 11-20-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station 12:35pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+68 to Station E6+08.07 I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:25pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+50, Elevation 165.90 (97.3% compaction @ 6.7% moisture) and at Station E6+00, Elevation 165.90 (98.3 % compaction @ 7.2% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 123.5 lbs. per cubic ft. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 91 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+17.25 to the angle point at Station E6+08.07. 2:25pm I scheduled Maser Brown from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material for Monday afternoon, 23 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 088 Date: 11-20-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed '1-1,--GL)424ti°" King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 087 Date: 11-19-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:12:00pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+90 to E6+08.07 is 164.09 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 118 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:30am CTI has shut down their construction operations due to a significant Rain Event. 12:OOpm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 087 Date: 11-19-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped:12:00pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed -at Gv t� King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 086 Date: 11-18-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+90 to E6+08.07 is 164.09 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 118 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:05am I noticed CTI is now deploying type #85 Geo -Grid Matting at Station E4+90 to Station E5+50 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:35am I observed CTI has completed installing 60 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E5+03. 10:50am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:45am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 ''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:25pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E5+50 to Station E6+08 I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 4. eft 0 U w 04 O O•� 11/18/2009 M 4 O Z a Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station William S. Parsons >► m 'O CD Gary Meriino Construction Company, Inc. t N a co Notes 1 Wall E North Wall E North ca ci) w ED a. LL Pass Pass d E U a cv) 0) cv 0) t0) (3 g N r O) N r N O 1- CO g J 2 C) co T- lr) co r- aO) 0 0) Qa U Q el 6 ch cO 13 15 0 W H 0) CO .0- J O cc! O co C E. 1— To' N to cv 2 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow ai u) ~ tL 2 - I'D 0 W II O CO Station co CD N IDN Test # d' 97 a - 0) a a 0 u Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. c� i IL Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 085 Date: 11-17-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast x Fog Rain x TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:20am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+78.07 is 163.50 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:50am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 140 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:05am I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E5+03. 10:40am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:45am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/2" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #55 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E4+90 and type #85 matting at King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Report No: 085 Date: 11-17-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Station E4+90 to Station E5+78.07. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:35pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E5+25, Elevation 163.50 (97.0% compaction @ 6.9% moisture) and at Station E5+78, Elevation 163.50 (96.6 @ 6.3% moisture) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 123.0 lbs. per cubic ft. I also requested Mr. Parsons to evaluate the compaction at the fmished sub grade at Wall "E" North at Station E6+27, Elevation 165.57. Test results were as follows: Moisture at 9.8%, Dry Density 128.1 lbs per cubic, and 98.6% compaction. 2:05pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 135 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 to the angle point at Station E5+78.07. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement and to obtain a representative sample of the material for frequency testing of grain size distribution on Wednesday afternoon, 18 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 085 Date: 11-17-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed 0 heck rade, S. read Gra u. 2 �o — *o"|" rn 0 0 N s Lr o E cu o z IP4, 0 � T L 0 0 c r o U too `n x N L E ti 0. 11/17/2009 William S. Parsons o z z U c a) Q If L 0 Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station Ino Construction Com Notes Wall E North Wall E North Wall E North N LL 0_ Pass Pass Pass Q E U0) e 0 97.0 98.8 O cU N N N H co.75 N T r T N .0 x Jg 01 c*) r t0 c0 T T T 4k o CJ) to a) to CO t0 a OO U c+) CO co (O O ao a- m ii. •M co rn CD H co• of in ' Jo CD O CD O - cV Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow Native 0> = ii: = it _ it 1---01) CU ( W t) c*) c0 T to cY) CD T it 6 CD r CO„.. O r Station LO + LO CO T to 6+27 Test # I 138 139 I 140 w),Section 3.06.C.3.(Native 0) c C 5 a a O 0 d z t OD 0) O � T o W N V � m E — O0 T o ' o 0 W m W 0 > , c c o an O.in m ZrT M O M N O L a) E Q 2 z W c C o o U 7 a U a E o U U a Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector Const. Admin King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 084 Date: 11-16-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlin Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast x Fog Rain x TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:45am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:25am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+73.07 is 162.40 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:50am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 140 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:15am I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E5+03. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:45am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 'h" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #55 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E4+90 and type #85 matting at IP King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 084 Date: 11-16-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Station E4+90 to Station E5+73.07. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:35pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E4+50, Elevation 162.40 (98.4% compaction @ 6.0% moisture) and at Station E5+25, Elevation 162.40 (97.7 @ 6.5% moisture)) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.0 lbs. per cubic ft 2:05pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 140 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 to the angle point at Station E5+73.07. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Tuesday afternoon, 17 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 084 Date: 11-16-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed mna O Ca 41 O C• z O • C.2 C CC �. e e W 11/16/2009 William S. Parsons r 0) CC cling & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec ino Construction Com Notes Wall E North Wall E North Pass / Fail Pass Pass Comp. 98.4 a) O o a) tD a) co .. N i_ a) N o N x J 2 M M (+) M d 1k 0 a) (A a) (n a 0O U c`) (a (o 6 m LE F- ca 6.5 ..; J O (a O (a O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow ti a) U n a)I- _ if. = ii D > Eki) cu C7W T .- r (NO 0 O 0) b,- Station 4+50 Locm Test # 136 137 1/4" Gravel Borrow w (o 0 c 0 U d CO CO T (") 0 O O O -c 0 c 0 U oa E 0 0 2 0 0 U 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 0) (0 aa)) cc Resident Eng r. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 083 Date: 11-13-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+17.25 is 161.5 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:50am CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 84 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:15am I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:55am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+95. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:40am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to deploy type #55 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E4+90 and type #85 matting at • 0 a King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 083 Date: 11-13-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station Station E4+90 to Station E5+17.25. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:55pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E4+50, Elevation 161.5 (96.2% compaction @ 6.0% moisture) and at Station E5+25, Elevation 161.5 (98.0 @ 6.3% moisture)) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 123.0 lbs. per cubic ft 2:05pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 84 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 to the angle point at Station E5+17.25. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Monday afternoon, 16 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. 0 4 King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 083 Date: 11-13-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed 7 11/13/2009 William S. Parsons o O z z U (.6 N Q 2 L d. 0)) 0 d Contractor: Notes Wall E North 'Wall E North' Pass / Fail co al a Pass d E O U e 0 98.0 N rn O ON U2 128.1 4-. O F_ (D r N T �xt (d M 139.3 M c7)J M 1- 0 U) N - (A 0" Q. O• U O O (D O W m w ii I— "• cD 0 r J O CO O (D O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow U)I—' _ LL _ Lt_ .O j « 4) W 0 In (O (D r 0 Station 5+25 0 1C) + Tr Test # 1135 N i O a O U uj ca E C O to Ir.v 0. � y V A co" • 0 w W 2 C O O U ✓ al a E o U 1/4" Gravel Borrow, 07 0 V 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 082 Date: 11-12-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlin Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+17.25 is 158.01 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:40am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 84 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I attended the Weekly Construction Meeting held at Merlino's Construction Trailer. 10:OOam The Construction Meeting was adjourned. 10:15am I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+95. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:40am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 082 Date: 11-12-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions Bid Item#6 Relocation of Embankment as defined in Section 02300 information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install #55 and #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E5+17.25 I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:55pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at three different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E4+50, Elevation 160.11 (95.4% compaction @ 5.7% moisture) at Station E5+25, Elevation 160.11 (96.3 @ 6.3% moisture) and at Station E0+73, for Embankment Backfill behind Wall "E" North, Elevation 196.03 (92.8 @ 13.5% moisture ) Dry Density measurements were consistent at 122.0 lbs. per cubic ft 2:05pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 84 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 to the angle point at Station E5+17.25. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Friday afternoon, 13 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. O .c t O O c o ct Uco .� ►a v CrJ 11/12/2009 William S. Parsons 0 cling & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec lino Construction Com Notes Wall E North Wall E North Wall E South' Storm 1 N (i as 0 u- Pass Pass Pass Pass To Comp. L 95.4 c) Co o) 92.8 co L[) co X L RS U 2 00 N 128.1] O O) N T T c0 N T a) 122.2 y V N T 0) T 122.7 Di (0 g Cr) M T CO M Cn r 07 °i T z in LO I,- In O fl U O O • co 6.0 r of O co 13 N LL I__ N co N in ul M co • • J Q co O co O v N co O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 2 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow UQ (/� H = ii: _ is: _ Il _ it N Et.)i W a) coo co T "c2 in ,.,-i � O T T N r u O :d U) 0 4 5+25 ^ O r LO T Q N a) i-- M T C7 .-- CN7 — el C7 .— 0 O V F- O U a 1- I— Q 2 O N O l 0. E O U d m if. O to O. 0) Y v X N 'O a) 0) Q W O U Q O U 0 .j l4 O p0. U Proctor/Curve Number: KC -09-1415 (1 1/4"Gravel Borrow B-231), KC -09-351 (native) Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Test #130-#132 offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector 3. Test #132 is native backfill behind wall E South. Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 081 Date: 11-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday X Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+17.25 is 158.01 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:40am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 84 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:05am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+95. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. •t, 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 'h" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install #55 and #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E5+17.25 I observed the CTI King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 081 Date: 11-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:45pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow wall backfill material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E4+36.55, Elevation 158.51 (96.7% compaction @ 6.0% moisture) and at Station E4+74.00, Elevation 158.51 (95.7% @ 6.0% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 123.0 lbs. per cubic ft 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 84 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 to the angle point at Station E5+17.25. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Type #17 Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Thursday afternoon, 12 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. a King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 081 Date: 11-11-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed QW- tk.4 16 -- A ... all "E" North — hecking Grade, Com 'action, Settin Forms for Slo ie — Item a) o'e ' aho - : on c CAUMMIKI + 11/11/2009 William S. Parsons I m 0 7 / $ CC k 6 z z U ▪ � ¥ I Bow Lake Recycling & Transfer Station a) 0 ■ erlino Construction Com 0 $ 0 O 0 � E 0 U w 2 § pi k k a 0 an k k X 0 k / D w c E o k 00 E 0 o 0 0 0 a 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Eng r. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector k d 0 I Const. Admin. Notes Wall E North Wall E North Pass / Fail Pass Pass E 0 / N. k N k oo 0 . c 0 2 em CV 15 o 0) § q -I2\\ e \ L e ] P . ` c o 0 0 a d o �2 �� tfo \$ c co LLR ® CO t. m o -1O 6 Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow o \ _ _ meiiE - i \01 Rw /,- / C0 a Station 4+74 4+36 Test # 128 129 0 � E 0 U w 2 § pi k k a 0 an k k X 0 k / D w c E o k 00 E 0 o 0 0 0 a 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Eng r. 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector k d 0 I Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" North on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E4+33.55 to E5+17.25 is 155.11 and 158.01 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:40am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 84 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:25am I noticed CTI is now deploying #55 type matting at Station E4+33.55 to Station E4+40 and #85 type matting at Station E4+40 to Station E5+17.25 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E1+64.78 to Station E1+00. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #55 and #85 type Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install #55 and #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.50 to Station E5+17.25 I observed the CTI , King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:15pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E4+33.55, Elevation 158.11 (96.6% compaction @ 6.1% moisture) and at Station E4+74.00, Elevation 158.78 (95.4% @ 6.3% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.1 lbs. per cubic ft 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 84 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E4+33.55 Station E5+17.25. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Wednesday afternoon, 11 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-10-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab SignedL'(C`A)M'-- = H • CD 7 = IC ea •c Ida Ga W 0 0 0 w eln F" Ofj 0 c_ M E v 11/10/2009 William S. Parsons O 0 Z Z t 0 a 0 Li. & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec erlino Construction Com Contractor: O u Compaction Eq. Used: 2x Wacker WP 1550 Plate Com w to 0 ri O 0) cn N 0 c�) N 0 O 0 0) 0 0 fC a 0 U 0 0 .0 'C 0 0 U Project Mngr. 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. v 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector cj O U 0 Es c � 0 d Const. Admin. Notes Wall E North Wall E North CO (0 a� ci E 0 O co co c° a. co c 95.4 I Pass i t i IO 1 I a I IS L5 a)1. 0 p as ` 02 129,3 to N _ _ .. N - rn N P 'I N P n al Jg 11 39.3 139.3 4t 0 1.0 In LO In I? N 0 C la I UO • 0 • In N,-- N LL I- t° co f° a 6 J O to O O Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 0 a IA I— _LT LL. — > 151 2 0 W P ozi In P 03 In U) O 0 0 Station 4+33 v + Test # N P N P O u Compaction Eq. Used: 2x Wacker WP 1550 Plate Com w to 0 ri O 0) cn N 0 c�) N 0 O 0 0) 0 0 fC a 0 U 0 0 .0 'C 0 0 U Project Mngr. 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. v 2. Offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector cj O U 0 Es c � 0 d Const. Admin. k v A •.6 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E1+62.78 to E0+36.00 is 197.86 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:25am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E 1+50.00 to E0+40.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 7:40am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:25am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E1+64.78 to Station E0+77 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel 7:15am William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E1+40.00, Elevation 198.78 (98.7% compaction @ 6.6% moisture) and at Station E0+40, Elevation 198.78 (97.5% @ 5.8% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.1 lbs. per cubic ft 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E1+64.78 to Station E1+00. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 4. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 11:OOam Attended weekly Staff Meeting conducted by KPFF (Craig & CK) 11:15am Staff Meeting adjourned. 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 71/2" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:10pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 and #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+00 to Station E0+36. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 1:OOpm CTI is now engaged at the task of beginning the construction of Wall "E" North. They are presently setting forms with a string -line and deploying #55 & #85 Geo -Grid Matting beginning at Station E4+24 and E4+40 respectively. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 136 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+64.78 Station E0+36. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Tuesday afternoon, 10 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. c King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 080 Date: 11-09-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed 0 G Y E = 2 4 0) O William S. Parsons & Transfer St Bow Lake Rec co rlino Construction Com Notes _0 CID O Storm Storm Wall E Wall E V) 0 Pass 1 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass c E O U e 0 CD rn T ai a) CO U) a) I. r. co 0) n a) CO U) a) O ctf 02 co co co co co NCVNNNN co y CO T CD 'ct CD N1_ N N N N N g 138.6 138.6 138.6 138.6 138.6 138.6 d' 3l: 0 CO CO CO CO CO LO LO U) LO l0 C) LO Q U O N N N CV N Lri tri Lri Ui Lri N Cri N-.- N if 12 c) a) co v N CO Lr). Ln' N: (0 LO Lri � J o cccccc a) a) a) a) a) 0) Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow .0 E. Q) U) 1— _ _ _ _ ,_ LL U SL LL it _ u. D >0 0W Co in r- U T O) 1 T Co n a) T y 0 w m w m U U U 0 Station o£+O 6Z+£lb 9Z+9 I-V 96+17 IN OL+9lb 0 + T Test # N N N CO N T T T T T N T 1 1/4"Gravel Borrow B-231 Proctor/Curve Number: KC -09-210 Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2. Test #124 & #125 offsets from face of wall. Lead Inspector O U N C � � U Q Const. Admin. .. WIIIIIMINTMELIITIMWTTUTZIPTVIETWNTIIIMI'Efflr="'I• : King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 079 Date: 11-06-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E1+62.78 to E0+36.00 is 197.86 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:25am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E1+50.00 to E0+40.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 7:40am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4'. spacing intervals. 8:05am Met with King County Materials Laboratory personnel William Parsons, Geralyn Miller-Nucci, and Joe Karahuta to discuss Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material Quality Assurance Frequency Testing (Gradation). KCML personnel obtained three representative samples of Gravel Borrow Material from three different locations at MSE Wall "E". 9:25am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E1+64.78 to Station E0+77 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum tum around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:25am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E1+64.78 to Station E1+00. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 Y2" lengths on top of the King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 079 Date: 11-06-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed (A) sti`"`,— . South Embankment — Compacting Embankment Material behind Wall E Wall "E" — Checking Grade Transition to 5% — Bid Item 1 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 078 Date: 11-05-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 1:OOpm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activi tY Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E1+62.78 to E0+36.00 is 197.86 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:35am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E1+50.00 to E0+40.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 7:45am CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywoodformwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:15am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E 1+64.78 to Station E0+77 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E1+64.78 to Station E1+00. 10:30am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:30am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '/2" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 11:50am CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 078 Date: 11-05-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 1:OOpm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 and #85 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+00 to Station E0+36. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 136 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+64.78 Station E0+36. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Friday morning, 6 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 078 Date: 11-05-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 1:OOpm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed r;I.% ty'b qt `~N. 5_ t.f 3• `a+`,�•}^a ' '"rti Di. �, fs Y " ,- y t: r : 'Esiyp - �, Ar' �p.9} t ' 7.$,f4 a i 4 y r ‘!It" P ,f rl - r,� Mr. 1 . yt'r4e.!• y t }' #•s r �fl.a.rt 1�4. h 74` }�S1 �x �, ,yt Ery -. ,yd a 1'' `,gyp T+:-. ✓. � a It , { d [t' V b ('"%• 'Y 'e�xe a d e T } +�7'�r jy.,�({. 'St.=,��t Y ' xie a .P �+r a F• . mFL � vkkz • ea'�,, F � tX Ei %� - ff,,�5 $. •�`i i. �f�t,. .. e � " . .'ii.:1 15 5'h r �. SA [t' 1 l n f• t • fi. W 4.y 'l( a q. r�.r�t< 1. 1. a 5 t>. i�w -jWCCt`.�K iq .yi,q bii "B'1. Y P l� t Sf�" y 4P ,}[y~ Wall "E" - Compacting the Edge of Wall next to the "Key" - Bid Item 1 King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 076 Date: 11-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday X Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activi ty Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:15am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E1+92.78 to E0+66 is 195.42 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:20am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E1+70.00 to E0+70.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 8:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:OOam I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E1+92.78 to Station E0+66 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:OOam I observed CTI has completed installing 67 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E2+10 to Station E1+38. 10:45m I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:15am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 ''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This ,— ! King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 076 Date: 11-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+38 to Station E0+66. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 136 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+92.78 Station E0+66. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Wednesday afternoon 4 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. P r _, King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 076 Date: 11-03-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed 1144,4e4.-- 0 CJ O O o a cis aa Ucq O 4) L E a. 4) 0 CC O O CD CCO C W 0 O r William S. Parsons & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec lC Merlino Construction Com Contractor: d O F. 1 O N c.) 0 u) H 2 0 W )w 0 U ca a 0 U 0 U Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. Lead Inspector Const. Admin. Notes 136" Storm E O C0 co 36" Storm 1 n co LL Pass Pass Pass a E 0o O o 0 o o 0 • c II i-. 0 X i as 02 N N N ll') to U) r r r l >. a a I— 1125.2 �� 125.2 124.6 x J 2 138.6 138.6 138.6 4t O Lo to to to u7 lf) jQ0 c o V n' 5.4 5.4 5.4 N N M �Q J o cocoa Oi Oi Oi Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow UQ a) >, Cn F- IL .LT:it: Grade/ Elev. �y� lf) \'J T Offset C/L Trench CIL Trench C/L Trench Station co M rn TT O r r r Ii) a) I- LO N- CO r r r r r r d O F. 1 O N c.) 0 u) H 2 0 W )w 0 U ca a 0 U 0 U Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. Lead Inspector Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 075 Date: 11-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday X Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy X Overcast Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 X 55-70 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:25am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E2+00.78 to E0+66 is 194.91 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:30am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E 1+80.00 to E0+60.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 9:OOam CTI crew has now finished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:15am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E2+00.78 to Station E0+60 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:OOam I observed CTI has completed installing 67 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E2+10 to Station E1+38. 11:OOam I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:15am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 Y2" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:05pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 075 Date: 11-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 1:3pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction of the Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E1+30 at Elevation 194.91 (97.8% compaction @ 6.2% moisture) and at Station E0+50 at Elevation 194.90 (98.6% @ 5.9% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 123.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+38 to Station E0+66. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 134 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E2+00.78 Station E0+66. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material placement on Tuesday afternoon 2 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 075 Date: 11-02-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed ti' i William S. Parsons O O z z 0 a) Q d & Transfer Station Bow Lake Rec rlino Construction Com i 0 0 0 'o O o_ 0 0 2 0 to E am) O O E. O C o 0 N Y ,- c? as X N No TO u) L N W c 0 O U Uas E o U O N 0 0) 0. 0 U d) N 0 O CO 0 C7 a N 0 U a) z U Lo 0 d Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2.Offsets from face of wall. O c 0 a) J Const. Admin. Notes W cc L.L1 al � � Pass Pass Q. E O U O 97.8 to o) U N N >. 0 '' 0 X al co 138.6 1 122.4 138.6 1123.5 it e 0 to u7 in ) 2 U 10-1 it o Q O 't ui ui -a TD to (NI O o a co tr co tri Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 0Q U) H- __ it LL Grade/1 Elev. 0 0 )) T Cr; O0 ) T Offset CV 1T T Station 1+30 0 10 + 0 Test # 113 v T 0 2 0 to E am) O O E. O C o 0 N Y ,- c? as X N No TO u) L N W c 0 O U Uas E o U O N 0 0) 0. 0 U d) N 0 O CO 0 C7 a N 0 U a) z U Lo 0 d Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2.Offsets from face of wall. O c 0 a) J Const. Admin. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 073 Date: 10-29-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday X Friday Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 x 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:25am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E2+10.00 to E0+77 is 194.50 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:35am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E2+10.00 to E1+30.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 8:35am I observed CTI has employed their Hitachi 270L Excavator to begin excavating for finished sub -grade elevation of 154.94 at Wall "E" North starting at the angle point at Station E0+77.66 to Station E0+00. The excavated material is then being placed and compacted behind Wall "E" North using a D6 Dozer to spread the material and a CS453 Vibratory Roller to compact the material. They will now place 2X4 inch Quarry Spalls at this section of the wall to stabilize the sub grade for their off road haul truck to unload Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material. 9.05am CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:35am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E2+10 to Station E0+77 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:35am I observed CTI has completed installing 64 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E2+10 to Station E1+46. 11:05am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 073 Date: 10-29-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:25am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 '''A" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:OOpm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:35pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction of the Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E1+24 at Elevation 190.77 (99.1% compaction @ 6.0% moisture) and at Station E0+84. at Elevation 194.5 (96.3% @ 7.2% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.3 lbs. per cubic ft. 12:55pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E 1+46 to Station E0+77. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:05pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 133 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E2+10 Station E0+77. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material on Friday afternoon 29 October 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 073 Date: 10-29-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling • Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed fiat -4 Q6lti,...C....., es and Forms — Bid Item 1 10/29/2009 William S. Parsons M 0) CC & Transfer Station u Bow Lake Rec erlino Construction Com actors, Komat 0 0 d 0. 0 c) r rJ m o 0 w :: ccm co a . ri Es O o 0 to r u a. N .- N r r.. a ch O Y) � M N r p O r) N O Y cu 0 0 0 N w E W WC w C o 04 O o 3 13 a 0 E o o 0 o a Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2.Test #105 & #106 offsets from face of wall, test #107-#110 from back of wall. Lead Inspector Contractor • Const. Admin. a Z W w 3 € o co Pass Storm I Pass Storm Pass i Storm Pass / Fail Pass Pass Pass To Comp. 99.2 0 cD a) I) a) a) r 97.0 r F- a) O a) a) 0 C x. vm N N N N N N N N N N N N v cn 0 0 — CD N N c0 N c0 N N 117 N c0 O N 2cci 138.6 138.6 138.6 co r 138.6 co co r aIn o 11) In 1C) Iii 10 10 In in 1n 1n In Percent Moisture Lab Field Corr. Opt. Test Opt. 5.4 In 1n vt 16 5.4 5.4 Na) n•co a1 11) co ai c0 0i CO ai ao of m ai co ai Material Type 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4"- Gravel Borrow 1 1/4°- Gravel Borrow J o a w>. V) F— — it =— it LT: — ff.' — lL — LL a) • al N V, W in co in c v C7 N -dim I-- r 1- d O t 1•- d 6 1-- d Station N/7 r —13;173471 a 7 co a co Q A7+51 i Test # 105 O r 107 co O r • O— r- actors, Komat 0 0 d 0. 0 c) r rJ m o 0 w :: ccm co a . ri Es O o 0 to r u a. N .- N r r.. a ch O Y) � M N r p O r) N O Y cu 0 0 0 N w E W WC w C o 04 O o 3 13 a 0 E o o 0 o a Project Mngr. Remarks: 1. Troxler 3440 #38246 Resident Engr. 2.Test #105 & #106 offsets from face of wall, test #107-#110 from back of wall. Lead Inspector Contractor • Const. Admin. OR. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 074 Date: 10-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm DAY OF THE WEEK: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday X Saturday WEATHER: Clear Partly Cloudy Overcast X Fog Rain X TEMPERATURE: 10-32 32-55 55-70 X 70-85 85+ Construction Activity Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions 6:30am I arrived at the Project Site. 6:30am I attended the Daily Construction / Safety meeting conducted by CTI. 7:25am I observed CTI is involved at the task in the construction of the MSE Geo Grid Retaining Wall System at Wall " E" on Road "B". I noticed CTI crew installing formwork for the face of wall to Project Specifications and at proposed elevation with a laser level and station rod. The current sub grade elevation for this lift of the wall at this section from E2+10.78 to E0+77 is 193.94 respectively. CTI has cut 1" plywood for formwork to support the face of wall at 18" widths and at 8' lengths. 7:45am I observed CTI has placed three Ecology Blocks at the wall location from Station E2+10.00 to E 1+10.00 and attached a steel cable through each block for Fall Retainment. The blocks are set back from the face of wall approximately 6 feet. Each member of CTI's crew working within the six feet area from the face of wall is wearing Fall Retainment Harnesses. 9.05am CTI crew has now fmished setting the form work and is now placing a string line to keep the forms level and straight for this 100 foot section of the wall. CTI will now set in place 3/8" diameter steel strap with a length of 2'7" X 1' height. This is being done to support and maintain the wall face batter for each layer installed at the wall. The steel straps are set under the plywood formwork at 1' to 4' spacing intervals. 9:35am I noticed CTI is now deploying #110 type matting at Station E2+10 to Station E0+77 on top of the previously compacted lift at the wall with a minimum turn around of three to five feet and a 6" overlap at each deployed Geo -grid section. They will now sew / weave together the overlaps of the matting using Size #3 Re -steel. 10:15am I observed CTI has completed installing 72 lineal feet of MSE wall at Station E2+10 to Station E1+38. 11:15am I observed CTI placing #5 Re -steel at 3' spacing for support at the face and the base of the wall. The Re -steel is 6' in length with a 90 degree bend of 2' with a minimum clear spacing of 2" extended outside the face of wall. 11:25am CTI will now place the Geosynthetic fabric in 12'X 7 ''h" lengths on top of the previously placed #110 Geo grid fabric in the same matter at a 6" overlap with a minimum return tail length of 3 to 5 feet. 12:15pm CTI is now using a walk behind Wacker WP 1550D Vibratory Plate Compactor to compact the first 6" lift of gravel borrow material. I observed the time spent to compact the first 6" lift for this section to be approximately 3 to 4 minutes. This a, 01, King County Bow Lake Recycle & Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 074 Date: 10-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Bid Item#1 Site Preparation for Bow Lake Recycling and Transfer Station City of Tukwila Permit Number: D08-389 Conditions information will used to assist in evaluating the time needed for achieving 95% compaction at each lift placement. 12:35pm William Parsons from King County Materials Lab visited the Project Site to evaluate compaction of the gravel borrow material being placed at the Geo Grid Wall base. He is using a Troxler Moisture Density Guage to test compaction of the Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material at two different locations for this lift placement. Test results at Station E1+10.78 at Elevation 193.94 (99.6% compaction @ 5.6% moisture) and at Station E0+60.78 at Elevation 193.94 (95.6% @ 8.5% moisture). Dry Density measurements were consistent at 124.0 lbs. per cubic ft. 12:45pm I observed CTI is now continuing to install # 110 Geo Grid matting on the MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E1+38 to Station E0+77. I observed the CTI crew is using the same installation procedures as previously aforementioned in this report. 2:15pm I noticed CTI crew has completed installing the 133 lineal foot section of MSE Geo -Grid Wall at Station E2+10 Station E0+77. 2:20pm I scheduled William Parsons from King County Materials Lab to evaluate compaction of Gravel Borrow Wall Backfill Material on Monday aftemoon 2 November 2009. 2:30pm I departed the Project Site. King County Bow Lake Recycle 8 Transfer Station Site Preparation - Contract Number 1 Contract Number C00272C08 Inspector's Daily Report Report No: 074 Date: 10-30-09 Contract Title: Bow Lake Recycle and Transfer Station Prime Contractor: Gary Merlino Constr. Contract Number: C00272C08 Inspector: Bob Warner Time Work Started: 6:30am Time Work Stopped: 2:30pm Was anyone injured today? Yes No X Details EWO work performed today? Yes No X None Trucking tickets received today? Yes No X None Directions given to contractor? Yes No X None. Project Delays. Yes No X None Project scheduling Yes X No William Parsons from KCML for compaction testing. Problems identified? Yes No X None. Material received & condition? Yes No X None Visitors? Yes X No William Parsons King County Materials Lab Signed