HomeMy WebLinkAboutTrans 2011-11-21 COMPLETE AGENDA PACKETCity of Tukwila
Transportation Committee
Joan Hernandez, Chair
Joe Duffie
Verna Seal
80TE11114.00 pg AGENDA
Distribution:
2011 501 Equipment Rental Budget
J. Hernandez
G. Labanara
J. Duffie
C. Knighton
V. Seal
S. Kerslake
D. Robertson
Clerk File Copy
A. Ekberg
2 Extra
Mayor Haggerton
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
D. Cline
e -mail pkt pdf to A. Le
K. Matej
e -mail cover to: C.
B. Giberson
O'Flaherty, D. Almberg-
F. Iriarte
Dideon, B. Saxton, S.
R. Tischmak
Norris, M. Hart, S. Kirby
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2011
Time: 4:00 PM (before 5 PM Budget Work Shop) Place: Conference Room #1
Item Recommended Action Page
1. PRESENTATION(S)
2. BUSINESS AGENDA
a)
2011 501 Equipment Rental Budget
a)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 1
Purchase of a Thermoplastic Striper
12/5/11 Regular
b)
2011 Street Department's Traffic Control Devices
b)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 5
Purchase of 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaires
12/5/11 Regular
c)
Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
c)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 7
Acceptance of Federal and State Grants
12/5/11 Regular
d)
Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
d)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 11
Supplement #9 with KPFF
12/5/11 Regular
e)
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center
e)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 83
Supplement #13 with IBI Group
12/5/11 Regular
f)
Andover Park West Street Water Improvements
f)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 103
Supplement #14 with IBI Group
12/5/11 Regular
g)
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center
g)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 117
Ordinance for Acquisition of Right -of -Way, Permanent
12/5/11 Regular
Easements Temporary Construction Easements
h)
Tukwila Urban Center Access (Klickitat) Project
h)
Forward to 11/28/11 C.O.W. and
Pg. 135
ROW Transfer Between WSDOT and Tukwila
12/5/11 Regular
3. SCATBd
a) 10/18/11 Meeting Summary a) Information Only Pg. 157
4. MISCELLANEOUS
5. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Future Agendas:
Next Scheduled Meeting: Per 2012 Schedule
The City of Tukwila strives to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
Please contact the Public Works Department at 3-ft79 for assistance.
x
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: 2011 501 Fund Eauipment Rental Budget
Purchase of a Thermoplastic Striper
ISSUE
Purchase pavement marking equipment listed in the 2011 Budget.
BACKGROUND
The existing paint striper was purchased in 2000 and total depreciation was achieved in
2010. A new unit was budgeted in 2010; however, all equipment purchases were put on
hold due to the economic downturn. The budget funds were then included in the 2011
Budget as a carryover, Line 18 on page 299 for $80,000.00.
ANALYSIS
As paint usually begins to fade within 6 -12 months after application, we are proposing to
purchase a thermoplastic striper. Using Thermoply instead of paint will increase efficiency of
operations significantly by increasing the life expectancy of the pavement markings. The
Thermoply application normally lasts several years.
Alpine Products of Auburn was the low bidder for King County's system and the City of
Tukwila can piggy back on their bid for the same system. The Thermoply system includes a
trailer, melter, and an applicator.
BUDGET SUMMARY
The purchase price for a new thermoplastic striper is $92,896.52 and with the $80,000.00
budgeted; a balance of $12,896.52 is still needed. We are proposing to use $4,840.00
liquidated from the 501 fund from a Street Department's Line Locator that has been
completely depreciated and will not be replaced. The remaining funding difference of
$8,056.52 can be funded from the Streets Department's roadside budget line
000.16.542.700.31.00.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve purchase in the amount of $92,896.52 per King County bid for a Thermoplastic
Striper from Alpine Products and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of
the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meeting.
Attachments Page 299, 2011 -2012 Biennial Budget
Photo of Thermoply application
Thermoplastic Striper Brochure
W: \Shared Copy Only \Gail\lnfo Memo Thermo Pavement Markings 11- 18- 11.doc
2011 -2012 Biennial Budget
NEW REPLACEMENT PURCHASES IN 2011 -2012
EST. PURCHASE REPLACEMENT
DESCRIPTION UNIT COST YEAR YEAR
POLICE:
1
Patrol Car
1117
53,000
2011
2
Patrol Car
1716
Patrol Car
53,000;
2011
3
Patrol Car
1718
j
53,0001
2011
4
Patrol Car
1719 1
53,0001
2011
5
Patrol Car
1720
53,000
2011
6
Patrol Car
17 21
53,000
2011
7
Patrol Car
1127
53,0001
2011
8
Patrol Car, K -9
1722
57,0001
2011
9
Patrol Car, K -9
1728
57,0001
2011
10
Detective Admin Sedan
1145
25,0001,
2012
11
Detective Adm Sedan
1157
25,0001
2012
12
Major Crimes ER Adm Sedan
1122
27,0001
2012
13
Major Crimes ER Admin Sedan
1163
27,000
2012
FIRE:
City of Tukwila, Washington
UNIT
2014
Patrol Car
2014
Patrol Car
2014
Patrol Car
2015
Patrol Car
2015
Patrol Car
2015
Patrol Car
2015
Patrol Car
2015
Patrol Car, K -9
2015
Patrol Car, K -9
2019
Detective Admin Sedan
2019
Detective Admin Sedan
2019
Mjr Crms ER Adm Sedan
2019
Mjr Crms ER Adm Sedan
14
Command Car, BC
1281 85,000 2012 J
2019 Command Car, BC*
*Note: Per TMC3.80, FD must
fund cost above 10% variance (estimated to
be approx. $41,200)
S
15
Lift T ruck Manhft
1278 90,000' 2012
2022 Lift Truck (Manlift)
PARKS:
16
1 h -T on Pickup
1205 28,000; 2012
2019 3 /4 -Ton Pickup
TOTAL BUDGETED PURCHASES 792,000
BUDGETED CARRYOVERS
17 Utility vehic w/ Spray Tank 1653 $63,6 2011 2021
18 Paint Striper 144 80,000 2011 2021
19 Arrowboa 1427 7, 2011 2018
20 TBD
TOTAL CARRYOVERS 151,100
GRAND TOTAL] 943,100
1
Utlty veh w/ Spray Tank
Paint Striper
Arrowboard
Page 299
2
x
Equip. Index
CH220m
BASIC SPECIFICATIONS
Page 1 of 1
220 lb. Material Tank:
Removable/Interchangeable
75,000 BTU Heatine Svstem:
Highest in the industry.
All Steel Extrusion Dies:.
Heat treated Steel, no drip, clean cut on/off operation.
Improved push/pull mechanism eliminates die springs.
Variable Width Glass Bead Sastem: 4 6 8 12" and dual 4" lines with the turn of a dial.
Hand Torch:
Standard equipment for numerous requirements.
Lockable Rear Caster:
Straight track locked position or 360 degree swivel.
Size:
Weight: 240 lbs. (I 10 kgs.)
Length: 48 in. (1205 mm)
Width: 30 in. (760 mm)
Height: 39 in. (980 mm)
http: /www.trantexinc .com/equip /egpindx.htm
11/9/2011
4
Click here for a detailed specification
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director "Rf�.l
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: 2011 Street Department's Traffic Control Devices
Purchase of 250 LEOTEK LED Luminaires
ISSUE
Purchase in the amount of $106,488.75 for the acquisition of 250 LED roadway lighting
luminaires from LEOTEK Electronics of Milpitas, CA.
BACKGROUND
Currently, roadway illumination costs the City of Tukwila as much as $190,000 each year
in electrical utility costs. The latest advances in roadway LED lighting technology can
reduce the power consumption for lighting fixtures by nearly 50 while providing more
reliability and longer life to the fixtures. Also, the cost of LED fixtures has been going
down over the years and is now only 20% higher than traditional light fixtures.
We should expect to see lower utility costs and reduced maintenance calls as we begin
to convert the older lighting fixtures that are on metered accounts throughout the City.
The 2011 traffic control budget in Streets 000.16 and 104 Fund's Annual Traffic Signal
Program both have remaining balances that can be utilized for this purchase. The
Department of Community Development's (DCD) Energy Efficiency grant may also be
utilized for this purchase. The Energy grant's timeline is being extended and given that
some cities are not using all of their grant funds, we have requested additional funds.
Rebates from Puget Sound Energy are also being pursued.
This purchase was bid by 2 vendors and LEOTEK Electronics was selected based on
LED unit cost per fixture.
BUDGET SUMMARY
000.16.542.630.31.01 Street Lighting Supplies
000.16.542.640.31.01 Traffic Control Supplies
104.98.595.800.64.00 Annual Traffic Sianal Proaram
Total
RECOMMENDATION
9,000.00
75, 000.00
23.000.00
107.000.00
Approve purchase in the amount of $106,488.75 for the acquisition of 250 LED roadway
lighting fixtures from LEOTEK Electronics and consider this item at the November 28,
2011 Committee of the Whole meeting and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular
meeting.
attachment: Quote
W: \Shared Copy Only \Gail \Info Memo LED Purchase 11- 18- 11.docx
QUOTE EAR11 -0002 DATE: 11 -08 -11 PAGE 1
Sea -Tac Lighting Controls, LLC.
4439 S. 134th Pl. Bldg E Phone: 206 -575 -6865
Tukwila, WA 5$168 Fax: 206- 575 -8013
www.seataclighting.com Quotes Fax: 206- 575 -1557
$°_M
To: Scott Bates
City Of Tukwila
Proj: TUKWILA ROADWAY LED 80C
TUKWILA, WA
Tukwila, WA 98188 Bid Date: 11/08/11
433 -1862
Remarks:
Qty Type Mfg Description Unit Pricel Extd.Pricel
1 3521 1LEOTIGCI- 80C- MV- NW -2M -GY 1 389.001 $136928.001
80LED ARRAY- -REBEL SERIES LED -TYPE 2
MEDIUM-
I I 14000K 1 1 I
INOTE ILEOTIFULL FREIGHT ALLOWED 1 1 1
INOTE ILEOTICAN SHIP IN 24HRS AS LONG AS STOCK IN CA OTHERWISE 1
INOTE ILEOTILEAD TIME IS 6 -8 WEEKS 1
1 I Total 1 1 $136928.001
IF.O.B. Per MFG (Terms: Net 30 Days (Lead time: 6 -8 Weeks I
(Prices firm for entry by: 45 Days (Shipment by: 60 Days
Subject to manufacturer's published terms and conditions of sale.
Quotation is void if changed. Complete quote must be used, no partials unless otherwise noted.
No hardware or accessories are included, unless noted.
ALL ballast quoted are not brand specific and are chosen at the factories discretion, unless
noted.
Verification of voltages, mounting methods,row information ceiling style, finishes, etc.
is the resDonsib.il;t_v_ of Distributor /Contractor and is required at time of order.
Printed 11/08/11 12:59:27 Per: NORA SCHULTZ
H
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian /Bicvcle Bridge
Project No. 90510403
Acceptance of Federal CMAQ Grant and State Enhancement Grant
ISSUE
Accept two grants for the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge.
BACKGROUND
In May 2009, the City submitted an application for a Federal CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality) grant for the Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge project that requested $1,000,000.00. At the time,
the application was not successful, but the project was included on the PSRC Contingency List for
any additional funding (either through new federal funds being made available or awarded projects
not using all the funds). In August 2011, the PSRC Executive Board awarded Tukwila a portion of
the CMAQ grant in the amount of $750,833.00 from the Contingency List.
In July 2010, the City submitted an application to the Statewide Transportation Enhancement
Program in the amount of $500,000.00. This application was successful and a grant was awarded
with funding available in 2011.
DISCUSSION
The Statewide Transportation Enhancement Program grant of $500,000.00 does not require any City
matching funds. The Federal CMAQ grant requires a 13.5% City match, which in this case is
$117,182.00. A new CIP page is attached that adds the additional design costs while reducing the
construction budget. Park Impact fees are being collected for this pedestrian bridge and the
expected fees will now cover part of the City match for design, rather than just construction.
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to formally accept these two grants; the Federal CMAQ grant of $750,833.00
and the State Transportation Enhancement grant of $500,000.00 for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle
Bridge and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent
December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: New Page 10, Proposed 2012 CIP
Grant Agreements
W. \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \05 -RW03 TUC Ped Bridge \INFO MEMO 2 Grant Accept CMAQ State.docx
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program
'e
Z
WSr.
e rr n� „�aa 4 7
er
S
a
10
51
2012 to 2017
PROJECT:
Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Project No. 90510403
DESCRIPTION:
Construct a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over the Green River.
Pedestrian /bicycle connection between Tukwila's Urban Center and commuter rail /Amtrak station.
JUSTIFICATION:
Supports local and regional goals and policies regarding land use and transportation in Urban Center.
Pedestrian System Report identified the optimal location for bridge crossing to be south of the Best
STATUS:
Western Hotel. Type, Size, and Location Report was completed in 2011. Council approved a design of
a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley Highway.
MAINT. IMPACT:
To be determined.
State Enhancement design grant for $190k and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) planning grant of $55k.
COMMENT:
State Enhancement grant of $500k and Federal CMAQ grant of $750,833 for final design. Project is on Park
Impact Fee list with funding of $2 million with an 80 %/20% split.
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
229 30 984 390
1,633
Land (RAIV)
100
100
Const. Mgmt.
1,000
1,000
Construction
6,485
6,485
TOTAL EXPENSES
229 30 984 390 100 7,485 0 0 0
9,218
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
229 30 916 321
1,496
Proposed Grant
5,200
5,200
Mitigation Actual
0
Park Impact Fees Expected 35 80 1,485
1,600
City Oper. Revenue
0 0 68 34 20 800 0 0 0
922
TOTAL SOURCES
229 30 984 390 100 7,485 0 0 0
9,218
Project Location,,
z
515E 81 �1
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program
'e
Z
WSr.
e rr n� „�aa 4 7
er
S
a
10
51
Pugef Sound Regional Counoi
ME
August 4, 2011
The Honorable Jim Haggerton
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd
Tukwila, WA 98188
Dear Mayor gger on:
On behalf of the Puget Sound Regional Council, congratulations on receiving $2,000,000 for Tukwila Urban
NVi Center Access Project and $750,833 for Urban Center Pedestrian Bicycle Bridge.
This PSRC funding was approved by our Executive Board in July. Thanks to great work by your staff
and elected leadership, these projects were identified as high priorities and rose to the top out of a pool of
many other worthy projects.
Helping communities secure federal transportation funding is one of the key roles of PSRC. We know in
these tough economic times that local governments are searching far and wide for the resources to deliver
needed transportation improvements and also grow jobs in the near tern. In 2012, PSRC will select
projects for the roughly $400 million in federal funds the region can expect to receive over the next few
years.
At every step of the way, we hope you'll call on us with questions and concerns as you look for funding
opportunities and work to iunplement your conununity's transportation, growth, and economic
development plans. You can reach us at (206) 464 -7090 or online at psrc.org.
Sincerely,
osl, Brown
Commissioner, Kitsap County
President, Puget Sound Regional Council
P.S. We're gearing up for an update of the Puget Sound region's five -year economic strategy, and there
will be many ways for you and your staff to be involved in this effort, Look for more information coming
soon and visit psrc.org/econdev /res to learn more.
101 1 Western keiw. Su.-e 500 Sea%, Washmgtor. 98104 -1035 (206) 464.7090 -FAX (206) 587 -4825 psrc.org
Alt
Washbgton State
wo Department of Transportation Local Agency Agreement Supplement
Agency Supplement Number
City of Tukwila 1
Federal Aid Project Number Agreement Number CFDA No. 20.205
STPE 1320(002) LA 6065 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)
The Local Agency desires to supplement the agreement entered into and executed on
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Project Description
Name Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/Bike Bridge over Green River Length not determined
Termini approximately between Baker Blvd (if extended) and Longacres Way (if extended)
Description of Work No Change
Non motorized bridge over Green River and wayfinding approach improvements along Baker Blvd to include bike lanes, trail
connector to the Interurban Trail east of West Valley Highway, and a new pedestrian signal on West Valley Highway
Reason for Supplement __11
Obligation of additional Enhancement Funds and CMAQ Funds
s
Q
AFT
Does this change require additional Right of Way or Easements? Yes No
The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition
to payment of the Federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions.
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
By By
Title Director of Highways and Local Programs
Date Executed
DOT Form 140 -041 EF
Revised 1/2007
10
Estimate of Funding
Type of Work
(t)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Previous
Supplement
Estimated Total Estimated
Agency
Estimated
Aweement/Suppl.
Proiect Funds
Funds
Federal Funds
PE
a. Agency
I 1
117,182.001
117,182.001
117,182.00
b. Other Consultant
190,000.001
500,000.001
690,000.001
680,000.00
c. Other Consultant
750,833.001
750,833.001
750,833.00
Federal Aid
Participation
d. State
10,000.00
10,000.001
20,000.00
Ratio for PE
e. Total PE Cost Estimate (a +b +c +d)
200.000.00
1,368,015.00
1,568,015.001
117,182.001
1,450,833.00
Right of Way f. Agency
1
a. Other
Federal Aid
h. Other
Participation
Ratio for RW
i. State
j. Total RM Cost Estimate (f +g +h +i) 1
1
Construction k. Contract
1
I. Other
m. Other
n. Other
o. Agency
Federal Aid
Participation
p State
1
1
Ratio for CN
a. Total CN Cost Estimate (k+l+m+n+o+D)
1
1
r. Total Proiect Cost Estimate (e+i+a)
200.000.00
1.368.015.0
1.568.01
A17,182,00
1.450.833.00
The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a condition
to payment of the Federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions.
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
By By
Title Director of Highways and Local Programs
Date Executed
DOT Form 140 -041 EF
Revised 1/2007
10
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Utilities Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
fl
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge
Project No. 90510403, Contract No. 07 -123
Supplement No. 9 with KPFF
ISSUE
Approve Supplement No. 9 with KPFF Consulting Engineers.
BACKGROUND
In late 2005, Tukwila received a $200,000 grant for design of the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC)
Pedestrian Bridge over the Green River from the Transportation Improvement Board's
Statewide Enhancement fund. KPFF was selected for the Type, Size, and Location (TS &L)
contract and has completed the TS &L Report. Staff has been successfully pursuing grant funds
to complete the design of this project. In October 2010, a new grant from the Statewide
Enhancement fund was awarded in the amount of $500,000. In August 2011, the City was
awarded a second grant in the amount of $750,833 from the State's Congestion Mitigation and
Air Quality (CMAQ) funding.
With the completion of the TS &L report, the Council gave direction to staff to pursue the design
of a twin -tied arch bridge with no accommodation for a future bridge crossing over West Valley
Highway.
DISCUSSION
Supplement No. 9 with KPFF includes the additional scope and fee to complete the design and
environmental permitting for the TUC Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge. Also included is the design of a
new pedestrian signal across West Valley Highway (in lieu of a future bridge crossing) and trail
design to connect users of the bridge to the permanent Tukwila Longacres Sounder Station. To
complete way- finding for users, connect the two transit hubs, and provide quality bicycle access;
the Supplemental Agreement also includes design of a "road diet" along Baker Boulevard to
replace excess vehicular capacity with new bike lanes and on- street parking.
Fiscal Impact: A new CIP page adds the additional design costs while reducing the construction
budget. Park Impact fees are being collected for this pedestrian bridge and the expected fees
will now cover part of the City match for design, rather than just construction.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Supplement No. 9 to Contract No. 07 -123 with KPFF in the amount of $1,367,580.11
and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent
December 5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachment: Supplemental Agreement No. 9
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \05 -RW03 TUC Ped Bridge \INFO MEMO Supp #9 KPF 11- 18- 11.docx 11
AlMl►
il�■�11On $ate
Supplemental Agreement
Agreement
Number 9
Original Agreement Number
07 -123 (h)
Project Number
05 -RW03
Project Title
Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Organization and Address
KPFF Consulting Engineers
1601 Fifth Ave, Suite 1600
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone:
Execution Date Completion Date
12/31/2013
New Maximum Amount Payable
1,612,436.93
Description of Work
Time and cost adjustment to incorporate efforts for the Plans, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate
Phase.
The Local Agency of the City of Tukwila
desires to supplement the agreement entered into with KPFF Consulting Engineers
and executed on and identified as Agreement No. 07 -123
All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read:
A comp] PIP. scope of work has been inchided as Rxhihit A -1
11
Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for
completion of the work to read: Revised completion date is December 31,2
Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows:
nayahlP is TZ1 Al'? AIA QI
as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement.
If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the appropriate spaces
below and return to this office for final action.
By:
Consultant Signature
DOT Form 140 -063 EF
Revised 9/2005
By: Ci ty of Tukwila
Approving Authority Signature
Date
12
Exhibit A -1
Supplement No. 9 Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
Plan, Specification and Cost Estimate (PSE)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Green River stands as a barrier between the City's urban center and the
transportation hub of the Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project is a
preliminary step in defining the pedestrian corridor connecting these commuter hubs.
This project shall determine the type of structure and its location for crossing the
Green River. The bridge is to be a signature piece of the corridor and along with the
associated trail provide a direct, safe and enjoyable walking experience.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of this project is to develop a connection from the intersection of
Baker Boulevard and Christensen Road to the Sound Transit property line of the
Sounder Commuter Rail /Amtrak Station. This project will take place in three phases,
which include the following:
Type, Size and Location (TSL) Phase
Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate (PSE) Phase
Construction Management Phase
This scope of work shall be for the completion of the TSL Phase and the advancement
of the project through final construction documents for the PSE Phase.
During and /or at the conclusion of the PSE Phase, the City of Tukwila can exercise
the option to supplement KPFF's contract to include the Construction Management
Phase.
The project team is made up of the following firms:
Owner
Prime Consultant
Structural Engineering
Civil Engineering
Urban Design
Landscape
Illumination
Surveying
Bridge Architecture
Environmental and Permitting Services
Geotechnical Engineering
City of Tukwila
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPFF Consulting Engineers
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
KPG Inc.
LMN Architects
Landau Associates
Landau Associates
13
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK
The following is a scope of work for the completion of the TSL phase and the
completion of the plans, specifications and estimated construction costs (PSE) phase
of the project. In addition to the basic scope of services, the Consultant has included
additional services that can be performed at the City's request.
Task No. 1.0 Project Management and Administration
Task No. 1.01 Project Schedule
A project design schedule shall be created in Microsoft Project that spans from
the notice -to- proceed for the supplemental work to the completion of the PSE
documents. The schedule shall be updated on an as needed basis.
Task No. 1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements
KPFF shall prepare supplemental contracts for KPG, Inc., Landau Associates,
and LMN Architects.
Task No. 1.03 Progress Reports
A progress report form shall be provided to each team member. This form
shall be filled out on a monthly basis and submitted with the invoice for the
work described in the progress report. KPFF shall then compile the reports
into a single document to be submitted to the City with the associated monthly
invoice.
Task No. 1.04 Invoices
Team members are to prepare monthly invoices for work completed. KPFF
shall compile the invoices into a single document to be submitted to the City.
Task No. 1.05 Team Meetings
The consultant team shall meet with the City on a monthly basis to discuss
project issues, schedule, progress, and general coordination of effort. The
consultant team shall meet internally on a monthly basis to coordinate project
tasks and design.
14
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 3
Deliverables
Project schedule with monthly updates
Monthly progress reports and invoices
Team meetings
o Participation in project meetings with the City (assume 12 meetings)
o Participation in internal consultant team meetings with the City
(assume 12 meetings)
Task 2.0 Design Criteria Document
KPFF shall finalize the design criteria based on coordination with the City:
Minimum bridge /trail widths.
Horizontal geometry constraints (including minimum radii for curves)
and allowable design speeds for bicycles.
Maximum allowable vertical grades and rates of curvature for both
bridge structures and for access ramps.
Emergency access requirements.
Minimum lighting requirements.
Green River hydraulic opening requirements.
Requirements for stormwater detention and water quality.
Construction criteria within 100 -year flood plain.
Utility clearance requirements.
Structural loading conditions.
Allowable structural deflections and vibrations.
Physical/ aesthetic impacts on adjacent uses,
Coordination with potential future vehicular bridge in similar area.
Deliverables
Draft Design Criteria Document
Final Design Criteria Document
15
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 4
Task 3.0 Topographic and Boundary Survey
KPG shall perform topographic surveying within the entire selected alternative
bridge and trail alignment, which is defined as Christensen Road (west boundary)
across the Green River to West Valley Highway (east boundary). Necessary
horizontal and vertical control shall be established for the boundary and
topographic survey of the site. The survey for the defined project corridor shall
include the bridge and approach areas. Trail connections are from Christensen
Road on the west side and from West Valley Highway on the east side to the bridge
approaches.
Task 3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase 1
KPG shall provide surveying under two separate phases. Phase One is from
the Green River Trail on the west side of the river eastward to West Valley
Highway. This phase allows the location of the bridge, ramps and connection
to West Valley Highway, including the crossing of West Valley Highway for
design and installation of a pedestrian signal (both sides of highway). Phase
One also includes mapping the right of way of Baker Boulevard from
Christensen Boulevard to Andover Park West, including the Andover Park East
intersection, and shall locate curb, sidewalk, driveways, striping, illumination
and utility castings.
Task 3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2
Phase 2 shall include the Riverview Plaza parking lot contained within parcels
2523049077 and 2523049039, the SPU pipeline parcel 2523049048, and
north of that parcel to the face of the Riverview Plaza office buildings. The
intersection of Christensen Road and Baker Boulevard will also be included in
this phase. The total acreage of this area is approximately 7 acres.
All field topographic surveying shall be performed to achieve 1 -foot contour
interval accuracy, and shall include location of existing 4 inches plus caliper
trees (excluding Cottonwoods which shall be 12 inch plus caliper within 100
feet of the river), streets, curb and gutter, limits of paving, fences, above- and
below ground utilities, drainage features, existing shrub and lawn areas, and
existing improvements within the defined project corridor.
A separate cost for private utility locating services has been included which
assumes 24 hours of underground utility sensing and locating.
The field survey includes surveying the banks of the Green River from 50 feet
upstream to 50 feet downstream. The river survey shall include top of bank on
both sides of the river and cross sections from top of bank to top of water at
25 -foot intervals. Indicate limits of 100 -year flood plain, ordinary high
waterline (OHWL) flagged in advance on the bank by Landau Associates.
16
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 5
The survey crew shall use City provided Horizontal and Vertical control in the
project vicinity and all surveying and mapping shall be based on City
Horizontal and Vertical Datum.
A base map at a scale to be selected by the project engineer shall be developed
detailing the items located in the above described field survey. The map shall
include positions of record and surveyed boundaries, as well as deeded and
platted right -of -way margins for the project area.
It is proposed to use KPG's existing layer standards and point codes for the
survey. Once drafted, field verified, and certified, KPG shall provide the project
engineer with two Xerox Bond copies of the topographic survey and one digital
copy of project survey files (AutoCAD, point files, field notes). Any as -built
information gathered during our research shall also be copied and submitted
to the engineer with the topographic mapping package. The deliverable
submittal package shall include detailed descriptions of point code and
layering schema.
KPG has included time and expense for project meetings, management of
surveying and drafting efforts, professional review and quality control in our
proposal.
Deliverables
Survey Project Base Map (two hardcopies, one electronic copy)
Task 4.0 Geotechnical Research and Recommendations
This task includes the completion of all field exploration and laboratory testing
needed to finalize the geotechnical recommendations for the project. Geotechnical
recommendations will be provided for stormwater infiltration, pavement design,
and foundation design for the bridge and approach ramps/ embankments.
Task No. 4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
Landau Associates propose to advance a boring in the driveway to the house
located at 16113 West Valley Highway (King County Parcel number
000580033) to characterize subsurface conditions near the proposed east
bridge abutment. This boring will be advanced to a depth of about 120 ft
below the existing ground surface (BGS). Landau Associates plan to advance
three additional borings along the proposed trail alignment to characterize
subsurface conditions for stormwater infiltration rate evaluation and pavement
design. These borings will be advanced to a depth of about 17 ft BGS. The
borings will be completed using a truck- mounted drill rig using either mud
rotary (bridge boring) or hollow -stem auger (trail borings) drilling techniques.
Landau Associates have assumed that the City will obtain right -of -entry in
order to drill the borings and that no fee will be necessary to drill the boring.
17
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 6
The drilling will be accomplished by Holocene Drilling of Puyallup, Washington
under subcontract to Landau Associates. A geologist or geotechnical engineer
from Landau Associates will supervise the explorations, obtain soil samples
from the borings, and prepare field logs of conditions encountered in the
explorations. Soil samples will be obtained from the borings on about a 2'/2- or
5 -ft depth interval using the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) procedure, and
returned to our laboratory for further classification. Soil samples obtained
from the exploration will be held in our laboratory for 30 days after submittal
of the final report. After that date, the soil samples will be disposed of, unless
arrangements are made to retain them.
Landau Associates plan to install a standpipe piezometer in two of the three
borings advanced along the trail alignment. The standpipe piezometers will be
constructed in accordance with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-
160 and will be protected at the ground surface with a flush mounted
monument. Landau Associates propose to monitor the groundwater level in
the piezometers twice during the rainy season (typically November to May).
Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the boreholes not completed with a
standpipe piezometer will be abandoned in accordance with WAC 173 -160 and
capped with a minimum 1 -ft thick plug of quick- setting concrete.
Abandonment of the standpipe piezometers is not included with this proposal
and should be made part of the contract documents. Drill cuttings will be
placed in steel drums and transported to WM Dickson's facility in Tacoma,
Washington for disposal. Prior to drilling, a representative of Landau
Associates will mark the boring location in the field and arrange for an
underground utility locate (1- 800... call before you dig). Landau Associates
will also arrange for a private utility locate at each of the boring locations.
Three U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Falling Head Percolation
tests will be completed adjacent to the three trail borings described above to
determine the measured infiltration rate for porous pavement or biofiltration
swale. The EPA Falling Head Percolation tests will be completed approximately
1 ft BGS. The hollow -stem auger drill rig will be used to core through the
pavement section at the EPA Falling Head Percolation test locations. Upon
completion of the in situ infiltration test, the PVC pipe will be removed and the
hole will be backfilled with quick- setting concrete.
Landau Associates will conduct geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing
on representative soil samples obtained from the exploratory borings to aid in
their classification and determination of engineering properties. Laboratory
testing completed in our laboratory is expected to consist of 8 natural moisture
content determinations, 6 fines content determinations, 10 index tests (either
mechanical sieve analysis or Atterberg limit determinations), and 6 combined
analyses (mechanical sieve and hydrometer). A total of six soil samples will be
submitted to Analytical Resources, Inc. (ARI) of Tukwila, Washington for
determination of the organic content and the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC).
The organic content testing will be completed in accordance with ASTM D 2974
and the CEC testing will be completed in accordance with EPA laboratory
Method 9081.
18
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 7
In developing this proposal, it was assumed that work would commence during
daylight hours between Monday and Friday and that traffic control would
consist of traffic cones.
Task No. 4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting, and Meetings
Based on the results of our previous explorations for the TSL design phase and
the field investigation and laboratory testing program completed for this task,
Landau Associates will complete geotechnical engineering analyses to develop
recommendations to support the design of the bridge, including:
Recommendations for earthwork and site preparation including:
clearing, stripping, and grubbing; the suitability of onsite soils for reuse
in structural fill; import structural fill requirements, subgrade
preparation; and placement and compaction of structural fill.
Pavement subgrade preparation.
Porous asphalt and porous concrete pavement sections (asphalt or
Portland cement concrete and base course thickness) required for
structural support of the proposed traffic.
Conventional asphalt and Portland cement concrete pavement design.
Design infiltration rate for porous pavement. The infiltration rate will be
determined in accordance with the Simplified Method outlined in
Section 5.4.1 of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design Manual.
Seismic design criteria, including an evaluation of liquefaction and
lateral spreading potential.
An evaluation of the stability of the riverbanks and recommended
stabilization measures.
Recommendations for approach embankment structural earth wall
including: embedment depth, foundation subgrade preparation, design
parameters, nominal bearing pressure, anticipated foundation
settlement, and wall backfill and drainage considerations.
Estimated settlement of the approach embankments.
Recommended foundation type (driven piles /drilled shafts);
recommended tip elevations; expected range of nominal axial capacity;
uplift capacity; downdrag loads; estimated settlements of bridge
foundations; additional lateral loads caused by lateral spreading; soil
parameters for input into L -Pile (or equivalent) lateral pile capacity
software.
Construction considerations for the recommended foundation type.
Discussion of the impacts of constructing the bridge abutment and
approach embankment on the existing dike located at the west side of
the bridge and any recommended mitigation measures.
19
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 8
Deliverables:
The results of our field explorations and geotechnical engineering analyses will
be summarized in a geotechnical report. The report will include a site plan
showing the exploration locations, summary logs of conditions observed in the
boring, results of the geotechnical and analytical laboratory testing, results of
the in situ infiltration tests, and a discussion of subsurface soil and
groundwater conditions at the explorations. Two copies of the report will be
submitted as a draft for review by the project team. Upon receipt of comments,
Landau Associates will prepare and submit four copies of a final geotechnical
report. An electronic PDF copy of both the draft and final geotechnical report
will be provided to the design team.
Landau Associates have also budgeted to attend one meeting in the Tukwila
area with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineer (USACE) and the local Dike District
to discuss the impacts of the proposed project on the existing dike, and a
project kick -off meeting at KPFF's Seattle office.
Task 5.O Hydraulics
The Corps of Engineers (COE) has recertified the Green River Levee. The
recertification is only for the west bank, so the 100 -year flood plain on the east
side will be estimated at an elevation consistent with that determined by the COE.
The following is proposed for the hydraulic evaluation:
Task No. 5.01 Meet with Agencies
Meet with the Corps of Engineers and King County River and Floodplain
Management to obtain the best understanding of the ongoing studies and work
along Green River.
Task No. 5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplain
Based on existing COE data of the Green River, establish the current elevation
of the 100 -year floodplain within the banks of the Green River.
No work is currently scoped to identify 100 -year flood boundaries within
properties beyond the west bank of the Green River or east of West Valley
Highway.
Task No. 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
Confirm vertical clearance defined within preliminary documentation with King
County River and Floodplain Management and document negotiated vertical
clearance requirements for the bridge.
20
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 9
Deliverables
Draft Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic
copy)
Final Hydraulic Technical Memorandum (six hardcopies, one electronic
copy)
Task 6.0 Environmental and Permitting Services
This task covers consulting services to coordinate with regulatory agencies and to
provide required permit applications and associated environmental documentation
to obtain agency approvals for the proposed project.
Task No. 6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings
Landau Associates will assist in scheduling and participating in pre
application meetings with the City, Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW), USACE, and Washington Department of Natural Resources
(DNR) to coordinate permit conditions and easement requirements for the
project. Time is included to respond to agency comments on application
materials prepared in Tasks 6.02 through 6. 10, as presented below.
This task includes participation in at least two scoping meetings with WSDOT
Local Programs /FHWA and /or other potential state /federal funding agencies
to coordinate environmental documentation requirements associated with
project funding.
This task includes participation in up to six design team meetings and two
project workshops as identified in Task 1.05.
Assumptions
Five agency meetings at the project site are included in this subtask.
The six design team meetings and two project workshops will be held at
KPFF's offices in Seattle.
All time budgeted for meetings and workshops include travel time and
the deliverables mentioned in this task.
No additional studies will be required as part of the response to agency
comments.
Deliverables
Meeting summaries will be provided in e -mail correspondence.
Response to agency comments will be provided in e -mail correspondence
and within the associated documentation.
21
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 10
Task No. 6.02 State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist
Landau Associates will prepare the SEPA Checklist for the project in
conformance with WAC 197 -11 -960 and City standards. The SEPA Checklist
(Checklist) will briefly describe the project and address the project's effects on
elements of the environment, as outlined in the Checklist. The Checklist will
include a list of permit requirements for the proposed project. To prepare the
Checklist, Landau Associates will use project design information and other
available studies prepared for the project, such as the documentation prepared
for the additional tasks /subtasks included in this proposal.
As necessary to complete the SEPA Checklist, Landau Associates will review
additional City documents such as the comprehensive plan, zoning code, and
other development regulations.
Assumptions
Additional studies for impacts associated with traffic, air, noise, or
housing are not included in this subtask.
Figures to be included with the checklist will be limited to those
prepared under other tasks in this scope of work.
The project will not require preparation of a SEPA Environmental Impact
Statement. Either a Determination of Non Significance (DNS) or a
mitigated DNS will be issued for the project.
City of Tukwila staff will prepare and publish the DNS (or mitigated
DNS).
Landau Associates staff will not attend a public hearing should one be
necessary.
Information to prepare the SEPA Checklist will be gathered from
interviews with agency /utility provider representatives and from readily
available public documents; no additional field work or other primary
investigations will be required.
Landau Associates will provide a draft copy of the SEPA Checklist to the
City and KPFF for review. KPFF will provide one set of consolidated
comments to Landau Associates, and Landau Associates will prepare a
final SEPA Checklist for publication by the City based on those
comments. Should additional rounds of review and comment be
requested by KPFF and /or City, a scope and budget amendment will be
required.
This proposal does not include time for Landau Associates to respond to
any public or resource agency comments on the SEPA Checklist after
the Checklist has been published for public comment.
22
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 11
Deliverables
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft SEPA checklist.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and one paper copy of the final SEPA
Checklist.
Task No. 6.03 WSDOT Local Programs Environmental Classification
Summary/ Documented Categorical Exclusion
Landau Associates will prepare a WSDOT Local Agency Environmental
Classification Summary (ECS) with supporting documentation as required for
projects that receive federal funding through WSDOT (Environmental
Procedures Manual, Section 310.07). The ECS will include the recommended
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) determination (assumed to be a
Class II, Documented Categorical Exclusion). Landau Associates will
document this assumption according to the WSDOT Local Agency Guidance
(LAG) manual.
Task 6.01 includes participation in scoping meetings with WSDOT Local
Programs /FHWA regarding documentation requirements associated with
federal funding. At a minimum, this scope of services assumes that the ECS
will include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (see Task 6.04), effect
determination for species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and
Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) evaluation (see Task 6.05), a determination of
project impacts on cultural resources (see Task 6.06), and documentation of a
wetland/ waterway delineation and mitigation sequencing (see Task 6.08 and
6.09). The ECS will also require a discussion of stormwater treatment and
detention, which will be based on design and information provided by KPFF.
Assumptions
The proposed project will receive funding from FHWA administered
through WSDOT Highways and Local Programs. The budget outlined for
this task may be used for completion of similar NEPA categorical
exclusion documentation required if funding is provided by other federal
agency.
The proposed project will be determined to be a Class II Documented
Categorical Conclusion (DCE) and neither a NEPA Environmental
Impact Statement nor an Environmental Assessment will be required.
Air Quality, Noise, Section 4(fl /6(f), Floodplain, and Environmental
Justice analyses will be documented in the ECS. Individual discipline
reports and modeling efforts will not be required for these elements of
the environment.
Wetlands/ waterways impacts will be avoided.
23
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 12
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft ECS.
An electronic (Adobe PDF and FileMaker Pro) copy of the final ECS.
Task No. 6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Landau Associates will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(ESA) for the residence located on a portion of King County Parcel number
0005800033 "residential property and a Screening -Level Environmental
Assessment for the approximately 600 -foot trail alignment that extends east
through the parking lot of Riverview Plaza from Baker Boulevard to the Green
River "easement property;" to include up to four parcels). Additionally, a
limited Phase II task will be performed for the residential property, consisting
of a pre demolition Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead -Based Paint
(LBP) Survey of the existing building on the residential property. These efforts
will document the history of use and current conditions of the residential
property and the easement property, and will identify and evaluate
environmental conditions that may represent liabilities to the City.
Landau Associates will conduct the Phase I ESA and Screening -Level
Environmental Assessment in general accordance with the ASTM International
(ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment Process, E 1527 -05 (as currently applied in
the State of Washington), and with the scope of work as modified for this
project. The ASTM standard, while subject to changes (as are all ASTM
standards), is recognized as generally meeting the due diligence provisions of
the federal statute [Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) 42 USC 9601(35) (B)] and the Washington State
Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) (RCW 70.105D.040) at the time this proposal
was prepared. ASTM E 1527 -05 was published in November 2005 to satisfy
the elements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) All
Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) rule. This rule establishes requirements that
purchasers must meet to limit their environmental liability under CERCLA and
qualify for protections, including the "Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser" and
"Contiguous Property Owner" defenses that were added by the amendments to
CERCLA passed by Congress in 2002.
The goal of the assessment process outlined in ASTM E 1527 -05 is to identify
recognized environmental conditions, which are defined as the presence or likely
presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products under conditions
that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a
release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into the ground,
groundwater, or surface water of the residential property and the easement
property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products
even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to
include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human
health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an
24
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 13
enforcement action if brought to the attention of the appropriate governmental
agencies.
Elements not included in ASTM E 1527 -05 (e.g., identification, sampling, and
analysis of asbestos, radon, lead paint, and lead in drinking water and /or
wetlands; regulatory compliance; cultural and historic resources; indoor air
quality and vapor intrusion, including the potential presence of mold or other
biological contaminants; industrial hygiene; health and safety; ecological
resources; and endangered species) are not included in this task, except for the
Asbestos and Lead -Based Paint Survey discussed below, which will be
performed for the existing building on the residential property.
It is important to understand that Phase I ESAs are not a means of finding
"everything there is to know about a property." Rather, they are attempts to
determine the environmental liabilities of a property or properties based on
reasonably available documentation (both oral and written) within the budget
and schedule limitations. This approach will be applied to this task for the
Phase I ESA for the residential property, which will include:
Reviewing available aerial photographs, historical fire insurance maps,
topographic maps, city or county maps and street directories, and local
historical information to assess past uses of residential property and
adjacent properties from the present back to their first developed use, or
back to 1940, whichever is earlier.
Reviewing listings from a subcontracted database service
(Environmental Data Resources, Inc.) of confirmed and suspected
contaminated sites abstracted from EPA, tribal, and Ecology
environmental databases, as prescribed by ASTM. ASTM requires that
these databases be searched for confirmed and suspected contaminated
sites within various distances up to a 1 -mile radius of the residential
property.
Contacting the local health and fire departments for information they
may have on environmental conditions at and immediately adjacent to
the residential property.
Conducting a site reconnaissance of the residential property to visually
and physically observe current land use activities and environmental
conditions. Conditions at the residential property will be documented
with notes and photographs. We will assess current uses at adjoining
properties from the residential property and public rights -of -way to the
extent that they are visually and /or physically observable.
Preparing a draft written report presenting the results of the Phase I
ESA for City review. The report will identify data gaps in our
assessment, our efforts to fill them, and comments on whether the data
gaps are significant and affect our overall findings.
Preparing a final report incorporating City comments, as appropriate.
25
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 14
Additionally, an ACM and LBP survey will be conducted of the existing building
on the residential property by RGA Environmental, Inc. (RGA), as a
subconsultant to Landau Associates, to identify ACM and LBP, if present.
ACM will require removal prior to demolition of the structure. The presence of
LBP will require special work practices during demolition and lead- containing
building materials will require characterization prior to disposal.
The survey of the existing building on the residential property will include the
following activities:
Inventory of suspect ACM within the residence by a building inspector
accredited under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act of 1986
including:
o Identification of approximate quantities and locations of suspect
ACM
o Collection of up to 35 samples of visible suspect ACM
o Submittal of samples of suspect ACM to a laboratory accredited by
the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for analysis
of asbestos by polarized light microscopy.
Collection of up to 12 samples of painted surfaces from throughout the
residence and submittal of samples to an accredited laboratory for
analysis of lead by Flame Atomic Absorption (AA) for Total Lead reported
in parts per million (PPM)
Collection of one bulk building material sample for lead analysis for
waste disposal characterization (using the toxicity leaching procedure
analysis)
The results of the ACM and LBP survey will be summarized in a technical
memorandum. Attached 1
provided by RGA including
locations of ACM and LBP
and /or LBP identified,
considerations based on
analysis.
Assumptions
the technical memorandum will be information
the analytical results, figures showing the specific
in the residence, the estimated quantities of ACM
.nd worker protection and materials disposal
he results of the ACM and LBP sampling and
The residential property consists of a 0.28 -acre parcel that consists of
two pieces; the existing residential building occupies the southern -most
portion, and undeveloped land occupies the northern -most portion. The
northern -most portion of the parcel is not included in the Phase I ESA
for the residential property.
The City will provide copies of available environmental information
about the residential and easement properties including any previous
investigations or surveys.
26
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 15
The City will provide Landau Associates a completed copy of the "User
Provided Information Request Form" prior to completion of the Draft
Phase I ESA report. Landau Associates will provide the blank form.
The City will arrange for access and any necessary rights -of -entry to the
residential and easement properties.
The City will provide access to individuals /owners /tenants familiar with
historical operations at the residential and easement properties.
Conditions at immediately adjoining properties may not be observable
from accessible roads on the residential and easement properties or
from public access areas and, as a result, may not be identified during
the site reconnaissance.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Phase I ESA and Screening
Level Environmental Assessment report and the draft ACM and LBP
Survey technical memorandum.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final Phase I
ESA and Screening -Level Environmental Assessment report and the
final ACM and LBP Survey technical memorandum.
Task No. 6.05 Biological Assessment (BA) Section 7 Endangered Species
Act (ESA); Magnuson- Stevens Act Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Evaluation
Landau Associates will prepare a BA for selected species federally listed as
threatened or endangered in the action area under the ESA and EFH
Evaluation for the proposed project. Landau Associates will obtain updated
species lists from agency websites, request site specific species and habitat
information from the WDFW priority habitats and species database, and review
information from the Washington Natural Heritage Program.
Evaluation of specific project details, such as construction techniques and
equipment used, timing of construction, and best management practices
(BMPs) will be based on information provided by KPFF.
The report will establish the project action area, which incorporates the
furthest extent of both aquatic and terrestrial impacts. Appropriate
environmental baseline information and species history will be summarized in
the BA. A determination of "no effect" (NE) or "may effect, not likely to
adversely affect' (NLAA) is anticipated. The project is not expected to impact
EFH.
Landau Associates will prepare a draft BA and EFH for review and comment by
KPFF and the City, and then a final document.
27
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 16
Assumptions
The BA will be drafted using the current WSDOT template.
30% to 60% level of design will be sufficient for preparation of the BA
and EFH Evaluation report.
The project will have a NE or NLAA determination on listed species or
their designated critical habitat and a formal Biological Opinion will not
be required. The project will have no adverse impact to EFH.
WSDOT BA procedures for calculating the extent of aquatic impacts will
be used.
At the request of the Federal funding agency, this task includes
participation at two meetings with agency staff from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) or National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. The meetings are assumed to be at the
agency offices in Olympia, and include travel to /from Landau
Associates' Edmonds office.
The proposed project does not include in -water pile driving or blasting.
This task includes efforts to perform one 6 -month update review of
species listings. These efforts do not include analysis of project impacts
to additional species.
Design and construction details required for permit applications that are
not directly related to a critical areas determination will be provided to
the Landau Associates biologist. Such elements include, but are not
limited to, stormwater drainage report; temporary sediment and erosion
control plan; proposed construction timing, sequencing and duration;
and primary types of construction equipment to be used.
The budget and scope does not include monitoring of any federally listed
or state listed species during construction activities. Should any
monitoring of these species be required, an addendum to this scope and
budget can be prepared.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft BA and EFH Evaluation
report.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copies of the final BA and
EFH Evaluation report.
Task No. 6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation
Landau Associates will obtain the services of Equinox Research and Consulting
International Inc. (ERCI) to support the City in determining cultural resources
in the project area in compliance with Section 106 of the Historic Preservation
Act and the Governor's Executive Order 05 -05.
ERCI will perform the following activities under Task 6.05:
28
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 17
Assist the client in developing an Area of Potential Effects (APE).
Prepare for and participate in project related meetings as requested.
Carry out background research on the project and study area including
reviewing the research previously carried out by Landau Associates.
Design and implement archaeological field testing for prehistoric and
historic period sites Landau Associates estimate 40 or fewer shovel
tests will be required to test the areas of the project that are not covered
with asphalt or otherwise inaccessible.
Fill out archaeological site /isolate inventory forms for all sites
encountered during testing.
Determine eligibility (National Register of Historic Places) on all sites
encountered during testing.
Analyze survey results and prepare recommendations in a report in
compliance with tribal, federal, or/ and state regulations.
Landau Associates will assist ERCI in identifying the Area of Potential Effects,
provide coordination of field services, and provide report review for consistency
with other project documents.
Assumptions
Human remains will not be found during field testing.
A Memorandum of Agreement (federal process for disturbing an
archaeological site) or State Permit Application for site disturbance is
not included in this scope.
Preparation of Historic Property Inventory Forms is not included in this
scope.
Deliverables
Draft and final Cultural Resources Assessment report, including
required digital and up to 5 paper copies of final report required for
agency review/ approval.
29
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 18
Task No. 6.07 Shoreline Permit Submittal
Landau Associates will prepare additional documentation as required by the
Tukwila Municipal Code (TMC) for a shoreline substantial development permit.
Landau Associates will complete the City's Shoreline Permit application and
associated documentation, including a SEPA Checklist (see Task 6.02), two
sets of mailing list labels and a figure for property owners within 500 ft of the
project. Information required as part of the application also includes five
copies of the following:
Description of project consistency with decision criteria
Vicinity map
Shoreline Site plans (top of bank, landward catch point toe of levee,
riverbank toe, mean high water mark, and 100 -year base flood elevation,
appropriate setbacks, maintenance easements, limits of construction)
Sensitive area study documentation and plans
Cross sections
Landscape plans
Civil plans
Landau Associates will prepare the City of Tukwila Tree Clearing Permit
application, which will be included with the Shoreline Permit application
package. The "description of project consistency with decision criteria"
listed above will include reference to the City's tree regulations.
Assumptions
The City will pay all the applicable permit application fees.
Landau Associates staff attendance at a Hearing Examiner meeting is
included in this scope of services.
A tree survey will be completed by KPG and incorporated into the plans.
Trees to be identified are (Cottonwood excluded) 4 inches or more in
diameter as measured 4.5 feet above grade and cottonwoods 12 inch
dbh (diameter breast high) or greater within 100 ft of the river.
Construction will begin within two years of permit approval and be
completed within five years.
30% design plans will be suitable for the permit application, and the
City will waive the requirement that civil plans be stamped, signed and
dated by a licensed professional engineer as part of the permit
application.
30
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 19
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft Shoreline Permit application
submittals.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and required paper copies of the final
Shoreline Permit application submittal(s).
Task No. 6.08 Wetland /Waterway Delineation
Landau Associates will conduct wetland delineations in accordance with the
2010 USACE Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region. The
ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of waterways, including the Green River,
will be delineated using guidance provided in Ecology's Determining The
Ordinary High Water Mark on Streams in Washington State.
Landau Associates will compile and review environmental information from
readily available public domain resources to gain a general understanding of
potential wetland issues at the site. Public domain resources include, but are
not limited to:
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey data
National Wetlands Inventory mapping
Local Critical Areas mapping
U.S. Geological Survey topographic mapping
Recent aerial photography
The field investigation will include an examination of vegetation, soils, and
hydrology within the study area between the Baker Boulevard/ Christensen
Road intersection to the west shoulder of West Valley Highway. Flagging will
be placed along the wetland /waterway boundaries and will be confined to the
project footprint. Any wetland /waterway habitat that extends beyond the
project footprint, and within 200 ft, will be estimated both visually and using
public domain resources to assess wetland extent. Included in this task is
time to provide the project surveyors with a hand sketch of wetland /waterway
boundaries to assist the surveyors to locate project flagging. We also included
time to review the survey map and request any necessary changes to
accurately represent existing wetland /waterway conditions.
Wetlands within the study area will be rated in accordance with Ecology's
Washington State Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, and buffer
widths will be determined in compliance with the Critical Areas Regulations.
Stream typing and buffer widths are based on Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and
the water typing system presented in Chapter 222 -15 -131 of the Washington
Administrative Code (WAC).
31
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 20
Landau Associates will prepare a draft Wetland and Waterway Delineation
Report in a format acceptable to the City and other regulating agencies that
will include:
A summary of the methodology used
The size and rating of each wetland and waterway; a characterization of
wetland vegetation, soils, and hydrology; and field data sheets
A scaled site map showing the locations of wetland /waterway
boundaries and buffers, locations of wetland data plots, and site
topography
Supporting photographs
The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City for review. Comments
will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Wetland and Waterway
Delineation Report. The delineation report will be used in pre application
meetings for the purposes of discussing potential project impacts and
determination of agency jurisdiction.
Assumptions
Flagging will be placed only within the project boundaries where
accessible.
KPFF will supply survey information in AutoCAD format to Landau
Associates pertaining to the delineation and project plans.
The results of the delineation and delineation report will be used in
developing the 30% design.
Avoidance of impacts to wetlands and the Green River is an integral part
of the design to avoid the need for USACE permits for in -water work.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy the draft and three paper copies of final
Wetland and Waterway Delineation Report
Task No. 6.09 Critical Areas Report
Landau Associates will support the project team in the calculation of the area
of impacts to wetlands, waterways, and /or their buffers based on the 30%
project plans. Areas of impact will be calculated in AutoCAD and will be
summarized in the Critical Areas Report described below.
Landau Associates will support the project team in determining adequate
wetland /waterway impact avoidance measures. A conceptual compensatory
mitigation plan will be developed by Landau Associates for unavoidable
impacts to buffers. The conceptual compensatory mitigation will include a
planting plan.
32
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 21
Landau Associates will prepare a draft Critical Areas Report in accordance with
Chapter 18.45 of the TMC, and to meet standards of other state regulatory
agencies. The report will include information from the Wetland and Waterway
Delineation Report, and incorporate any necessary mitigation. This will
include:
A summary of the methodology used
A description of impacts to wetland buffers and /or shoreline buffers
A conceptual buffer mitigation planting plan (equivalent to 30% level)
including: mitigation goals, objectives, and performance standards; a
timeline for mitigation monitoring and reporting; and contingency plans,
as necessary
The draft report will be provided to KPFF and the City /agencies for review.
Comments will be reviewed and incorporated into a Final Critical Areas Report
for Wetlands and Waterways.
Assumptions
Impacts to wetlands and below the OHWM of waterways will be avoided.
Project impacts will be limited to buffers only.
Formal specifications will not be required as part of the report and /or
conceptual design.
Buffer mitigation can be accommodated on site (within the project
limits). If offsite mitigation is required, the City will identify a suitable
site to accommodate the required mitigation and potential out -of -scope
work will be determined at that time.
Conceptual mitigation plans and notes will not be incorporated into the
overall plan set until the 60% level (see Task 6.10).
KPFF will be responsible for coordination with the City and Landau
Associates during review and finalization of the document bid package.
30% design plans will be suitable for impact calculation and
development of conceptual mitigation plans.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and paper copy of the draft Critical Areas
Report for Wetlands and Waterways.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) and three paper copy of the Final Critical
Areas Report for Wetlands and Waterways.
33
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 22
Task No. 6.10 -Mitigation Construction Documents
This task consists of the design services necessary to prepare and complete the
construction documents for the mitigation design discussed in the Critical
Areas Report. Landau Associates will be responsible for submitting
construction documents at the 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent levels.
Landau Associates will prepare Divisions 2 through 9 of the Special Provisions
(or equal sections if in a different specifications format) for the mitigation
component of the proposed project. It is understood that only those divisions
that are necessary for work related to the mitigation component of the
proposed project will be included. The format will be the Washington State
Department of Transportation's standard format.
Landau Associates will prepare estimated quantities and associated costs for
the mitigation planting design. The estimate will be based on the plans and
specifications and will be prepared in accordance with the format established
by the City.
It is assumed that KPFF will provide examples of the most current
specifications, estimated quantities and associated costs, bid tabs, and any
AutoCAD base files needed to complete the plan set.
Assumptions
It is assumed that the mitigation planting area will not exceed 1 acre.
Permanent irrigation design is not included in this task.
Grading design and grading plans are not included in this task.
A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan is not included in this
scope. Some erosion control design is anticipated, but any erosion
control elements are expected to be minor and be coordinated with KPFF
for incorporation into the TESC plan(s) done by others.
A Notice of Intent, a Construction Stormwater General Permit and /or a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is not included in this task.
The CAD drawings produced will be based on Landau Associates
standard in -house format. If specific CAD standards beyond this are
needed, that information will be provided to Landau Associates.
Deliverables
Plans, specifications, and estimated quantities and associated costs for
the mitigation planting design each at 60 percent, 90 percent, and 100
percent submittals (up to 3 sheets, 22- x 34 -inch sheets at full size)
Items included in each submittal are as follows:
34
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 23
30 Percent Submittal (conceptual plan as part of Task 6.09)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format).
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 60% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format)
o Specification Outline (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 30% Comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sheets in PDF format)
o Draft Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
Final PS &E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sheets in PDF format and one signed original full
sized set)
Final Specifications (in Microsoft Word and /or PDF format)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (in Microsoft
Excel and /or PDF format)
o Response to City 90% PSE comments (via email or Microsoft Word
format)
Task No. 6.11 Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application JARPA)
The DARPA will include project specific information including a list of
adjacent property owners. This task includes time for coordination and
revisions with KPFF, the City and /or agencies, as needed, to provide
accurate information on the DARPA, including a narrative of project
information.
The JARPA will be suitable for submittal to reviewing agencies, including
but not limited to WDFW for the Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), DNR,
and the City. Full- or half -size project drawings will be provided with
submittal to reviewing agencies. The SEPA threshold determination issued
by the City (DNS or mitigated DNS) must be included as part of the
submittal package to WDFW. Coordination with reviewing agencies
regarding the DARPA is in included in Task 16.01.
35
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 24
Assumptions
The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the
U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE.
The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under
Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act.
Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM.
Deliverables
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the draft DARPA for review and
approval.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final JARPA and three paper
copies of the final DARPA.
Task No. 6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement
DNR will require an Application for Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic
Lands for the bridge crossing over the Green River. Landau Associates will
complete the application form and include a copy of the DARPA as a component
of the submittal to DNR. Coordination with DNR regarding Application for
Authorization to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands in included in Task 16.01.
Assumptions
The project will not include any dredge /fill activity in any waters of the
U.S. and will not require a Section 404 permit from the USACE.
The Green River is not a navigable waterway subject to regulation under
Section 10 of the Rivers Harbor Act.
Project plans will include a survey of the OHWM.
All other agency permits will be included with the application.
Deliverables
An electronic (MS Word) copy of the draft Application for Authorization
to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands for review and approval.
An electronic (Adobe PDF) copy of the final Application for Authorization
to Use State -Owned Aquatic Lands.
Task 7.0 Project Workshops
Task No. 7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick -Off Meeting
The team shall meet to discuss the previous work completed on the project and
develop an approach to move forward to be shared and discussed in a project
kick off meeting with the City.
36
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 25
Task No. 7.02 TSL Review Project Kick Of Meeting
The team shall meet with the City to review the work completed for the TSL
Study and discuss the preferred alternative being advance through
construction documents.
Task No. 7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to discuss tied arch concepts.
Task No. 7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to discuss approach concepts.
Task No. 7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop
The team shall meet with the City to finalize the tied arch and approach
concepts.
Task No. 7.06 Public Outreach
KPFF and LMN shall support the City by attending and supplying the following
graphics for a single public outreach meeting.
Workshop Graphics
o Tied Arch Alternative Sketches
West Approach Sketches
East Approach Sketches
Connection Detail Sketches
Surface Finish Examples
Color Examples
37
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 26
Deliverables
Preferred Alternative Graphics
o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined.
o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings
Attendance at the TSL Review 8s Project Kick -Off Meeting including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the Tied Arch Workshop including the creation of the
agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the West and East Approaches Workshop including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at the Final Overall Concept Workshop including the
creation of the agenda and graphics.
Attendance at a one (1) Public Outreach meeting including creation of
graphics.
Task 8.0 Civil Engineering
KPFF shall perform the civil engineering support work necessary to finalize the
concept and complete construction documents for the project.
Task No. 8.01 Concept Workshops and Preferred Alternative Selection
KPFF will assist in the development of approach alternatives for presentation
in the workshops outlined in Task No. 7.0.
Upon completion of the selection of the preferred alternative, KPFF shall move
the following civil engineering tasks forward through complete construction
documents.
Task No. 8.02 Site Preparation and Demolition
KPFF shall identify demolition and other site preparation work necessary for
the construction of the pedestrian facility.
38
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 27
Task No. 8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout
KPFF shall establish a construction horizontal and vertical alignment for the
pedestrian trail and bridge based on project control points and benchmarks.
This work shall also include design and layout of other related facilities such
as ADA ramps, curb ramps, etc, necessary for the pedestrian trail to tie to
existing grade and necessary grades established for the pedestrian bridge.
This work shall also include design and layout for accommodating vehicular
crossing of the pedestrian trail, and design of features to address safety for this
issue.
Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard. to reconfigure the
roadway from four lanes to two lanes and bike lanes and parking. Work
includes reconstruction of curb returns for curb bulbs for development of
parking.
KPFF shall develop plans for new vehicular accesses identified within the
parking lot circulation study, task 8.08.
Task No. 8.04 Grading and Paving
KPFF shall develop the necessary typical sections and proposed terrain model,
and establish finish grade and grading limits for the improvements. KPFF shall
develop cross sections at a 25 -foot interval showing the existing and proposed
grades. KPFF will meet with and coordinate with King County Flood District
and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) personnel to coordinate, protect,
and address their concerns with the project and anticipated construction and
disturbance within the western Levee of the Green River. (Assume 2 meetings).
Assumptions
No finish grade contours are included in this work. All grades will be
established with the proposed horizontal alignment, vertical alignment,
and typical section.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
City will obtain necessary permits with the (USACE) for abutment work
in the Levee.
Task No. 8.05 Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control
KPFF shall prepare temporary erosion control plans and details. Plans will be
prepared to a format consistent with the KCSWDM and the City's standard
details.
39
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 28
Assumptions
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for the
City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be included in the plan
set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
General notes are not included in this work.
Task No. 8.06 Surface Water
KPFF shall prepare a storm drainage technical information report (TIR)
following general format of the 2009 King County Surface Water Design
Manual (KCSWDM) to identify runoff volumes. TIR shall not address all core
requirements for the project improvement. It will, however, address decisions
regarding stormwater impacts and verification of existing conveyance
capacities. Draft TIR shall be submitted with the 30% design documents.
Final TIR will be submitted during the completion of the PSE package,
incorporating City comments.
KPFF shall also study to find if any areas will be suitable for infiltration of
storm water runoff, and integrate infiltration facilities to the extent determined
by the City.
Storm drainage plans will be developed to show necessary modifications to the
existing drainage facilities.
Assumptions
Water quality facilities will not be required due to the non pollution
generating characteristics of pedestrian facilities.
Detention is required. The project site currently drains to the Green
River.
Work includes plans showing storm drainage profiles. Pipe lengths,
types, and invert elevations will be shown.
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of
Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
Terrain model information for off -site runoff assessment will be provided
by the City.
40
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 29
Task No. 8.07 Utilities
KPFF shall design necessary relocations for City owned or privately
owned utilities disturbed by the project.
KPFF shall coordinate identification of utility relocations for any
franchise utilities being disturbed within public Right of Way (R /W).
KPFF shall meet and coordinate with Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) to
coordinate, protect, and address their concerns with the project and
their existing 60 -inch waterline. (Assume 3 meetings).
Assumptions
Private utilities shall be located by survey, and are not included within
this task.
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% submittal.
Potholing for determining utility depths is not included in this work. The
City will be responsible for coordinating with the utility companies to
perform any required potholing.
Necessary utility relocations will be shown on the Storm and Utility
Plans. Due to the small amount of anticipated work, separate utility
plans are not included at this time.
Work addresses existing utilities. No new utility construction is
currently included in this work.
Task No. 8.08 Channelization and Signing
KPFF shall design necessary channelization, roadway signing, and striping
work for the proposed construction and to address impacts to the existing
parking layout on site.
Work shall also include a study to identify alternative driveway relocation and
internal circulation for Riverview Plaza's parking lot.
Work shall also include rechannelization of Baker Boulevard from Andover
Park W. to Christensen Road. to change configuration from four lanes to two
lanes with bike lanes and parking, per configuration provided and negotiated
with the City. This work will also include turning movement assessment for
reconstruction of the curb returns.
41
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 30
Assumptions
Detail sheets will only include special construction. Standard details for
the City of Tukwila and /or the Washington State Dept. of
Transportation WSDOT) will be referenced on the Plans, but will not be
included in the plan set detail sheets.
Detail sheets are not included in the 30% Design submittal.
Pedestrian trail facilities and wayfinding signs are not included in this
task.
Temporary traffic control and temporary pedestrian route plans are not
currently included in this work.
City will facilitate coordination of rechannelization of Baker Boulevard
with the other City departments.
Task No. 8.09 Cost Estimate
KPFF shall compile construction quantities for work identified on the Plans.
The cost estimate shall be based upon WSDOT Standard Specifications and
Standard Item Table. These quantities and costs shall be updated for each
submittal and shall include backup documentation for each item quantity.
Assumptions
City shall provide copies of their latest bid tabulations for recent public
works contracts.
City shall provide unit cost for easements needed, including acquisition,
appraisal, etc.
Task No. 8.10 Specifications
KPFF shall compile specifications for civil work. 60% submittal shall be an
outline of identified sections within WSDOT Standard Specifications and
identified Special Provisions. 90% and 100% shall include all special
provisions required for the bid items identified.
Assumptions
City shall provide all front end documents and Contract Boilerplate for
specifications.
Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies)
Anticipated Civil Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: ±23)
o Site Preparation (3 sheets)
o TESC Plans (2 sheets)
o TESC Detail (1 sheet)
42
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 31
o Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
o Plan /Profile sheets (3 sheets)
o Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
o Utility (3 sheets)
o Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
30% Submittal
Draft Technical Information Report (Drainage Report)
Site Preparation (3 sheets)
TESC Plans (2 sheets)
o Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile sheets (3 sheets)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Utility (3 sheets)
o Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
0 60% level plan set (3 sets 1 1x17)
Specification Outline (3 copies)
Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
Final PS &E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Final Specifications (3 copies)
43
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 32
o Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 9.0 Structural Engineering
KPFF shall perform the structural engineering work.
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the Plans, Specifications, and
Estimate (PSE) design phase of the Tukwila Urban Center Pedestrian/ Bicycle
Bridge.
Task No. 9.01 Basis of Design
KPFF shall submit a written basis of design to summarize the design process
and criteria.
Task No. 9.02 Bridge Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design for the pedestrian
bridge. The design shall include the bridge superstructure and foundations
from the Green River levee on the river's west side to the triangular property on
the river's east side.
Components of the bridge design shall include the following items:
Deep foundations such as piles or shafts for support of the abutments.
West and east abutment substructures
Arch design
o Arch steel pipes
o Arch connection to the abutments
o Arch tension ties and tie connections
Arch connections
Deck superstructure framing
Deck slab
Deck safety railings
Arch suspension hangers and associated connection
44
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 33
Task No. 9.03 West Approach Ramp Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the west
landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp
superstructure and foundations.
Components of the west approach ramp design shall include the following
items:
Approximately 200 feet of ramp structure
Four (4) shaft foundations
Four (4) concrete columns
Structural earth walls
Steel superstructure
Deck slab
Hand railing
Task No. 9.04 East Approach Ramp Design
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of the east
landing ramp. The design shall be ADA compliant and include the ramp
superstructure and foundations.
Components of the east approach ramp design shall include the following
items:
Approximately 100 feet of ramp structure
Four (3) shaft foundations
Four (3) concrete columns
Structural earth walls
Steel superstructure
Deck slab
Hand railing
45
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 34
Task No. 9.05 Miscellaneous Structures
KPFF shall provide structural engineering for the PSE design of miscellaneous
structures such as way finding signs, retaining walls, etc.
Miscellaneous structures shall include the following items:
Wayfinding sign supports and foundations
Protective structures for existing utilities
Structural retaining walls
Lighting supports and foundations
Deliverables (Electronic and Hard Copies)
Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count: ±58):
General Notes Abbreviations
General Plan Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan 8s Elevation
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan Elevation
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan 8v Elevation (2 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
46
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 35
o Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
o Deck Vertical Support Details (3 Sheets)
o West Approach Plan Elevation
o West Approach Foundation Plan Elevation
o West Approach Superstructure Sections
o West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
o West Approach Deck Sections
o West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
o East Approach Plan Elevation
o East Approach Foundation Plan Elevation
o East Approach Superstructure Sections
o East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
o East Approach Deck Sections
o East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
o Main Span Handrail Layout Details (2 Sheets)
o West Approach Handrail Layout Details
o East Approach Handrail Layout Details
o Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
30 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Draft Basis of Design
0 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
0 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17)
Specification Outline (3 copies)
Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
47
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 36
Final PS&E Submittal:
Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE Comments (3 Copies)
Task 10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration
LMN will collaborate with the team on overall bridge approach structure
aesthetics, and will provide documentation supporting the PSE effort.
Task No. 10.01 Design Development and Coordination (30% PSE)
LMN shall submit a written Draft Basis of Design to summarize the
architectural design process and criteria, and shall provide design option
graphics for design workshops. LMN shall document, in drawings, the Draft
Basis of Design for the 30 Percent PS&E Submittal. In addition to Preferred
Alternative Graphics included in the deliverables below, LMN shall coordinate
the development of presentation renderings.
Architectural coordination will be conducted for the following components:
Bridge Structure
Arch geometry coordination
Arch color
Arch connections to:
Suspension cables
Bridge deck
West/ East abutments
Arch ties
Arch -to -arch lateral support
Suspension cables
Bridge deck
Handrail system
Light Fixture Coordination
Approach Ramps
Column treatments
Superstructure treatments
48
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 37
Deck treatments
Structural earthwall treatments
Handrail system
Creation of 30 Percent PS&E Submittal:
Draft Basis of Design
30% level plan set (3 sets- l lx17)
Task No. 10.02 Design Development and Coordination (60% -100
LMN shall provide architectural design and documentation services for the
pedestrian bridge and east and west approaches for the 60, 90, and 100
Percent PS&E Submittals. Work shall include refinement of the Draft Basis of
Design, coordinating the architectural design with associated engineering
disciplines, construction documentation of the architectural components of the
design, and preparation of architectural specifications.
Deliverables
Workshop Graphics:
Tied Arch Alternative Sketches
West Approach Sketches
East Approach Sketches
o Connection Detail Sketches
o Surface Finish Examples
o Color Examples
Preferred Alternative Graphics:
o (1) One physical Study level model, scale to be determined.
o (6) Six "Sketch -Up" quality renderings.
Architectural Plan Sheets (Assume a sheet count of 10 sheets):
Codes, Notes And Symbols
Enlarged Elevations
Enlarged Bridge Sections (2 Sheets)
Enlarged Arch Miscellaneous Details (2 Sheets)
Lighting/ Electrical Routing Details
Enlarged East Approach Sections
Enlarged West Approach Sections
Bridge Handrail Sections
49
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 38
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
o 60% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Specification Outline (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS &E Submittal:
0 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)
Final PS &E Submittal:
Final plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 11.0 -Urban Design and Wag finding
Task No. 11.01 Illumination
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for lighting for walkway,
bridge approaches, and bridge. Work includes aesthetic fixtures, conduits,
wiring and coordination of electrical power connection services with local
power company. The Consultant shall evaluate lighting performance
throughout the project using the AG132 illumination model.
Task No. 11.02 Wayfinding and Furnishings
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for wayfinding signage, and
potential pedestrian furniture (i.e. litter receptacles, benches, trail railings
(outside of bridge if required), etc.). Area for wayfinding includes Christensen
Road at Baker Blvd. east leading to Green River and West Valley Highway to
the a designated pathway on the east side of WVH (which also leads to the
Tukwila Station).
Task No. 11.03 Landscape and Irrigation
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for planting design and
irrigation design (including irrigation controller, water source point of
connection)
50
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 39
Task No. 11.04 Walkway Section/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE aesthetic details for walkway
section (note Civil Engineering by KPFF) and 30 %/60% parking lot layout
concepts for trail alignment studies through private property (Christensen
Road to Green River Trail (note after alignment has been selected KPFF will
provide Civil Engineering of Trail to Final PSE.)
Deliverables
Trail Alignment Alternatives and Selected Alternative Plan (including
conceptual parking lot reconfigurations
Anticipated Sheets:
o West Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details
o West Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and
Hardscape Details
o East Approach Landscape Plans and Details and Hardscape Details
East Approach Enlarged Landscape Plans and Details and
Hardscape Details
Trail and Bridge Lighting Plan and Details
o Wayfinding Signage /Site Furnishing/ Trail Railings Plan and Details
o Survey Basemap in two phases
30 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Draft Basis of Design
o 30% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
60 Percent PS &E Submittal:
o Final Basis of Design
o 60% level plan set (3 sets 11x17)
o Specification Outline (3 copies)
o Updated Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
o Response to City 30% PSE Comments (3 copies)
90 Percent PS&.E Submittal:
o 90% level plan set (3 sets- 11x17)
o Draft Specifications (3 copies)
o Updates Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 60% PSE Comments (3 copies)Final PS&.E Submittal:
o Final plan set (3 sets 11x17)
51
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 40
Final Specifications (3 copies)
Finalized Estimated Quantities and Associated Costs (3 copies)
Response to City 90% PSE comments (3 copies)
Task 13.0 Signal Design
KPG shall provide pedestrian signal design for the crossing of West Valley Highway
(SR 181), approximately midway between Strander Blvd. and Longacres Way and
signal modifications at the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
This work will include coordination with WSDOT to obtain WSDOT approval.
Depending on selection criteria(warrants) the signal could be Pedestrian Hybrid
Beacon (Hawk) signal. The location assumes no driveway /street intersection. Also
coordination with Tukwila Signal Maintenance Department shall be required at
the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
The following additional assumptions were made to provide direction to the
design:
No property acquisition will be required and the project will be designed
within the existing public right -of -way with no additional right -of -way
required.
Verification of aerial and underground conflicts at signal foundation
locations, will be required.
Any permitting will be a part of the larger project and not tied to the
signal design.
Survey will be provided for both sides of WVH and the needed
approaches for the intersection of Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard.
Electrical connections and potential trenching will be drawn
schematically to closet source, unless it is in vicinity of the signal.
Geotechnical for the project will be the basis for foundation /pole design.
Task 13.01 WSDOT Coordination
KPG shall coordinate with WSDOT an approval process for the signal
installation, including warrant analysis. Work includes preparing signal plans
and specifications for WSDOT review and approval, including final plan and
specifications approval for the city records.
Task 13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Hwy Design
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for pedestrian signal design.
Works includes coordinating with the City including any decorative and urban
elements for the signal pole design, channelization and signing plans, center
52
Exhibit A Scope of Work
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian /Bicycle Bridge Supplement #9
Page 41
median/ crosswalk design, etc. Signal design shall meet WSDOT /City of
Tukwila standards.
Task 13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E and Baker Boulevard
KPG shall provide 30 60 90% and Final PSE for Andover Park E and
Baker Boulevard intersection signal modifications. Works includes
coordinating with the City for temporary video detection installation, junction
box loop splicing, channelization and signing plans, etc. Signal design shall
meet City of Tukwila standards.
Task 14.0 Right -of -Way Services
This task will include the preparation of right -of -way plans and legal descriptions.
It is assumed at this time that determining property values and conducting land
acquisition negotiations is not a part of this scope of work and will be added at a
future date as necessary.
Task 14.01 Legal Description
KPG shall provide legal descriptions and exhibit maps for three parcels.
Task 14.02 Right -Of -Way Plan
KPG shall provide right -of -way plans including existing right -of -way research
and calculations, proposed alignment calculations, including a draft plan.
Task 14.03 Title Reports
KPG shall order title reports, review reports for legal descriptions and
easements. KPG will also obtain legal description for DNR lease, determine
ordinary high water line and prepare record of survey per DNR specifications.
Task 15.0 Construction Support Services
The project team can provide construction support to the City as the project
design is completed and the project goes to advertisement and then construction.
Tasks could include attending preconstruction meetings, answering contractors'
requests for information (RFI), submittal review and site visits. The scope and fee
for this task will be determined at a later date.
53
Exhibit E -1
Consultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary
(Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost Per Unit of Work)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification
Man Hours
Principal (Structural)
112.0 x
Principal (Civil)
34.0 x
Project Manager (Structural)
606.0 x
Project Manager (Civil)
683.0 x
Senior Engineer (Structural)
1468.0 x
Senior Engineer (Civil)
40.0 x
Project Engineer (Civil)
418.0 x
Design Engineer II (STR)
1020.0 x
Design Engineer I (STR)
0.0 x
Design Engineer (Civil)
663.0 x
CAD Tech (Structural)
1326.0 x
CAD Tech (Civil)
668.0
Project Coordinator (CIV)
114.0
Project Coordinator (STR)
158.0
Admin
0.0 x
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Costs (See Exhibit G):
Grand Total
Prepared By: KPFF Consulting Engineers
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit E -1
Revised 06/05
Rate
65.00
65.00
60.00
50.00
45.00
50.00
42.00
40.00
40.00
38.00
35.00
35.00
22.00
20.00
18.00
Total DSC
128.46 x 307,068.00
30 x 307,068.00
Cost
7,280.00
2,210.00
36,360.00
34,150.00
66,060.00
2,000.00
17,556.00
40,800.00
0.00
25,194.00
46,410.00
23,380.00
2,508.00
3,160.00
0.00
307,068.00
394,459.55
92,120.40
0.00
573,932.16
1,367,580.11
Date: November 15, 2011
54
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, PedBicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: KPG
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification
Man Hours
Senior UD/LA
197.0
X
Project Sury
90.0
X
Designer LA /Survey
549.0
X
CAD Technician
701.0
X
Survey Crew
184.0
X
Office Admin
0.0
X
X
X
X
V:
64.90
56.56
40.13
31.25
47.66
23.08
Total DSC
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 163.1745 x
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25 x
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Total
Grand Total
Prepared By: KPG
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
70,582.76
70,582.76
D-9-9
12,785.30
5,090.40
22,031.37
21,906.25
8,769.44
0.00
70,582.76
115,173.07
17,645.69
7,450.00
210,851.52
Date: November 15, 2011
55
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Summary Sheet
(Mandatory when Subconsultants are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, PedBicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: LMN Architects
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification Man Hours
Partner
Project Manager
Project Designer
Project Architect
Intern
Admin
Specs
QA /QC
156.0
322.0
404.0
378.0
467.0
37.0
68.0
52.0
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
B51W
72.84
39.42
44.23
34.86
23.56
18.75
39.42
38.42
Total DSC
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 190.47 x
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25 %X$
Reimbursables:
Itemized
SubConsultant Total
Grand Total
Prepared By: LMN Architects
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
71,476.95
71,476.95
Cost
11,363.04
12,693.24
17,868.92
13,177.08
11,002.52
693.75
2,680.56
1,997.84
71,476.95
136,142.15
17,869.24
5,000.00
230,488.33
Date: November 15, 2011
56
Exhibit G -1
Subconsultant Fee Determination Sheet Summary
(Mandatory when Subconsulatnats are utilized)
Project: Tukwila Urban Center, Ped /Bicycle Bridge PSE
Sub Consultant: Landau Associates
Direct Salary Cost (DSC):
Classification Man Hours
Rate
Cost
Principal 12.0
x
65.00
780.00
Senior Associate 10.0
x
56.00
560.00
Associate 67.0
x
47.00
3,149.00
Senior 350.0
x
40.00
14,000.00
Senior Project 68.0
x
36.00
2,448.00
Project: 104.0
x
32.00
3,328.00
Senior Staff 16.0
x
30.00
480.00
Staff 98.0
x
25.00
2,450.00
Senior CAD 78.0
x
31.00
2,418.00
CAD /GIS Tech 7.0
x
24.00
168.00
Project Coord. 92.0
x
29.00
2,668.00
Support Staff 22.0
x
17.00
374.00
Total DSC
32,823.00
Overhead (OH Cost including Salary Additives):
OH Rate x DSC of 200.87
x
32,823.00
65,931.56
Fixed Fee (FF):
FF Rate x DSC of 25
x
32,823.00
8,205.75
Reimbursables:
Itemized
25,632.00
SubConsultant Total
0.00
Grand Total
132,592.31
Prepared By: Landau Associates
Date:
November 15, 2011
DOT Form 140 -089 EF Exhibit G -1
Revised 01/09
57
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFFCMI KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
1-0 Project Management and Administration
1.01 jProiactSchedule 1
$4,962 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $1,514 1
$0 1
1 $6,476
1.02 lOssign Team Supplemental Agreements 1
$1,241 1
1 $0 f
f $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $1,241
1.03 Progress Reports 1
$3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $2,202 1
$0 1
1 $5,304
1.04 Invoices 1
$3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
1 $2,202 1
$0 1
1 $5,304
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) I
$0 1
1 $0 1
1 $12,469 1
1 $11,535 1
$0 1
1 $24,003
Consultant Meetings w/ City (Assume 12 meeting l
$6,513 1
1 $2,326 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $8,839
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting) l
$6,513 1
1 $3,102 1
1 $0 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $9,615
1[ Reimbursablesl
$0
$0 1
1 $250 1
1 $0 1
$0 1
1 $250
Subtotal
$25432
$5428
$12719 1
1 $17452 1
$0 I
I r-1-1,
2..
4.61 Field E%plOratiOns and LaporSiory I esting $u 1 $U 1 $o 1 $U 1 $4,243 I $4,243
4.02 Geoterhnical evaluation, Reporting, and Meetings I $0 1 $0 1 s0 I $0 1 $10,148 I $10,146
4.03 Review of Report and Comments I t0 1 82,161 1 t0 1 $U I $0 I $2,181
Reimbursablesl 30 I $o I t0 I 1U I $14,158 I $14,156
Subtotal
�:w l f �iY "i" "a�aC. h'ai uiu 'Nlkuu'm:ss uliwt w:wdml.,».,Rmm ,.::..y::n ...�...'�;x F R ,'R, ww. +wrwu�:L`tiie iGuv,s,v �,'l., n
5.0 Hydreullce (KPFF Clvlit
5.01 Meet with Agencies I $u 1 $3,015 1 $u I $0 I $u I $3,515 l
5.02 Establish 100 -Tear Floodolain I $0 1 13,949 1 $O 1 to I to I 13,949 1
5.03 Establish Structural Clearance 1 t0 1 $1,469 1 SO I 10 I to I 81,489
Reimbursablesl to 1 $u I Su 1 to I to I $0
Subtotal 5 I. t
,x,h, ,ii; �;;.;;;:z x x,x, in
n ronmen an rot n cps n au
6.01 Ie2m, Agenc7, and Pre- App710nion Meetings I so 1 $u 1 $U I $U I 319,166 1 $19,166
6.02 SEPA Checklist I $0 1 $2,068 I $0 I $0 I 2,956 1 $5,044
6.03 WSW I Local Programs ECS l $0 1 11,365 I t0 I t0 1 $3,594 1 $4,960
6.04 Phase Environmental Site Assessment I t0 1 $U 1 10 I 10 1 $6,434 1 $6,434
6.05 Biological Assessment/EFH I t0 I $3,101 1 $0 I 50 1 $11,467 1 $15, 1ti9
6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I to 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,421 I $1,421
6.07 Shoreline Permit I to I $2,1o9 1 t0 I to 1 $7,290
t9,399
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation 1
1 SO $0 1 1U I to 1 I 19,251
6.09 Critical Areas Report I $U I $3,350 I t0 I $0 1 $10,960,96 6 1 $14,315
6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents I to 1 $O I $0 I $0 1 $14,061 1 114,051
6.11 IAHPA I $0 1 $1,241 1 $0 I S0 1 12,369 1 $3,610
6.12 Aquatic Lands tasement I to 1 $u I to
1 $U I $1.594 1 $1,594
Reimbursablesl $u I y $u 1 $u 1 $u I $11,4x6 I $11x16
Subtotal. II
a!�w
7A Prolect Workshops
7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting 1 $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 I $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,100
7.02 TSL Review& Protect Kick-Off Meeting 1 $2,378 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 I $6,100
7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop 1 $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $748 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,154
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,608 1 $0 1 $3,608
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop 1 $2,895 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,617
West Approach 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,419 1 $0 1 $2,419
East Approach 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,419 1 $0 1 $2,419
7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop 1 $3,618 1 $1,034 1 $1,211 1 $1,477 1 $0 I $7,340
Connection Detail Sketches 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $3,014 1 $0 1 $3,014
Surface Finish Examples 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,737 1 $0 1 $1,737
Color Examples 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,737 1 $0 1 $1,737
Study Model Development 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,368 I $0 1 $4,368
Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6) 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,305 1 $0 1 $2,305
7.06 Public Outreach 1 $3,618 1 $1,034 1 $0 1 $1,477 1 $0 1 $6,130
Graphics 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $12,110 1 $O 1 $12,110
Reimbursables $0 1 $0 1 $200 1 $2.500 1 $0 52,700
8.01 Concept WoriOhop and Preferred Aft Selection 1 $0 1 $5,479 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,479
8.02 Site Prep and Demolition 1 $0 1 $4,342 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,342
8.03 Horizontal and Vertical Layout 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Route Layout 1 $0 1 $1,902 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,902
Horizontal Control 1 $0 1 $1,385 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,385
Ramp transitions 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,605
Vertical Alignment $0 $1,861 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,861
Vehicular Crossingof Trail $0 I $2,688 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $2,688
Rechannelization Baker St 1 $0 I $6,038 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,038
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction 1 $0 I $6,823 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $6,823
8.04 Gretlingand Paving 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
Terrain Model 1 $0 I $2,957 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,957
Typical Section 1 $0 1 $1,820 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $1,820
Coord with KCFD and USACE $0 I $2,988 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,988
Soy TESL 1 $0 1 $5,211 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $5,211
8.06 Surface Water 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 I $0
TIR 1 $0 I $8,571 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $8,571
Site Drainage 1 $0 I $4,197 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $4,197
Infiltration 1 $0 I $4,280 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $4,280
8.07 Utilities 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
City and Private Relocations 1 $0 1 $2,605 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2.605
Page 1 of 4
58
Page 1 of 4
58
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrtan/Bicycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFF Civil KPG Inc. LMN Archttects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
8.08 Channelization and Signing
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study
Rechannelization Baker St
8.09 Cost Estimate
30%
60%
90%
Final
8.10 Spedfications
60 Outline
90% Special Provisions
Final Special Provisions
8.11 Plansheets
30%
She Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Utility (3 sheets)
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
QC Review
'60%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility(3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sectors (I sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
UUlity(3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
Final Bid Set
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (I sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing 14 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review
9.0 Structural EnQneering (KPFF)
9.01 IBesis of Design
9.02 ONO DaejV
1 Deep Foundations
West Abutment
East Abutment
Arch Steel Pipes
Arch Abutment Connections
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
$0 I
$1,820 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,820
$0 1
$5,314 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,314
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$7,175 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $7,175
$0 1
$196 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $196
$0 1
$6,100 1
$0 1
$0 I
$O
1 $6,100
$0 1
$4,197 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $4,197
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,941 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,941
$0 1
$5,030 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $5,030
$0 1
$3,810 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $3,810
$0 1
$3,642 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,642
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
1
1 $0
$0 1
$1,034 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
$1,034
$0 1
$3,993 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,993
$0 1
$3,727 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,727
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
I $0
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $0
$0 1
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $3,536
$0 1
$3,277 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,277
$0 1
$2,243 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,243
$0 1
$3,231 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $3,231
$0 1
$4,218 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $4,218
$0 1
$1,856 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,856
$0 1
$3,148 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $3,148
$0 1
$5,355 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
I $5,355
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $0
$0 1
$0 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,884 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
$2,884
$0 1
$2,755
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,755
$0 1
$2,362 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
I $2,362
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $1,768
$0 1
$4,016 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $4,016
$0 1
$2,026 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,026
$0 1
$3,701 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,701
$0 1
$1,851 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,851
$0 1
$1,768 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 I
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,536
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$5,717 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,717
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 1
$2,393 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,393
$0 1
$2,362 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,362
$0 1
$1,246 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,246
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$3,148 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $3,148
$0 1
$1,639
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,639
$0 1
$2,011
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $2,011
$0 1
$1,851 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,851
$0 I
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $1,768
$0 1
$3,536 1
$0 1
$0 1
$O
1 $3,536
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$5,262 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,262
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 I
$0 I
$O 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$0 I
$507 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $507
$0 1
$507 1
$0 1
$0
$0
1 $507
$0 I
$703 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $703
$0 1
$507 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $507
$0 1
$1,639 1
1
$0 I
$0
I $1,639
$0 1
$1,639 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,639
$0 1
$708 1
$0 1
$0 I
$O
1 $708
$0 1
$1,416 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,416
$0 1
$1,768 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,768
$0 1
$1,768 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $1,766
$0 1
$408 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $408
$0 1
$1,825 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,825
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$O 1
$O 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
$O 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$O 1
$310 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $310
$0 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$O 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$O 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$O 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$0 1
$401 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $401
$0 1
$349 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $349
$0 1
$530 1
$0
$0 I
$0
1 $530
$0 1
$349 1
$0
$0 1
$0
1 $349
$0 1
$801 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $801
$0 1
$220 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $220
$0 1
$1060 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $1,060
$0 1
$0 I
0 1
0 1
$O
1 $0
Subtotal`
1 $879 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $879
1 $0 1
1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
1 $20,056 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
$0
$20,056
1 $10,028 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $10,028
1 $10,028
$0 1
$0 1
$0 I
$0
I $10,028
1 $15,921
$0 I
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $15,921
1 $5,634 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $5,634
1 $11,269 i
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $11,269
$5,634 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0 1
$0
I $5,634
Page 2 of 4
59
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ES71MATE: City of Tukwila
TukWlla Urban Center, PedwWarVBicycle Bridge
Deck Superstructure Framing i $7,702 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $7,702
Deck Slab $7,702 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $7,702
Deck Hand Railing $7,702 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $7,702
Arch Suspension Hangers i $20,056 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $20,056
903 West ADproach Remo Design $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Shaft Foundations $11,269 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
1 $0 I $11,269
Concrete Columns
i $10,028 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
Structural Earth Walls r $10,028 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
Steel Superstructure $11,269
Deck Slab 1 $0 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $11,269
$10,028 1 $O 1 $0 I $0 1 $0
I $10,028
Hand Railings i $10,028 I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,028
9.04 East ApDmach Ramp Design $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0
Shaft Foundations $5,634 1 $0
1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Concrete Columns i $5,634 $O 1 $0 l $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Structural Earth Walls 1 $5,634 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
Steel Superstructure $10,028 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Deck Slab $6 I
634 5,634
Hand Railings 1 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,634
i $5.634 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,
9.05 Miscellaneous Structures 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 I 80 I $0 0
Wayrmding Sign Supports and Foundations $8,167 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $8,167
Utility Protection Structures $10,028 l $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $10,028
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls i $8,167 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,167
Lighting Supports and Foundations $8,167 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8.167
906 kntiCIPSted Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count' t58) $0 1 I $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $0
General Notes and Abbreviations i $2,404 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2, 404
General Plan and Elevation r $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Horizontal Control Plan $2,946 1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5.893
Foundation Layout i $2.404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $2,4G4
Pile Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
West Abutment Plan and Elevations $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,946
West Abutment Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Abutment Plan and Elevations $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
East Abutment Details $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $o
Superstructure Layout $2,946 1 $0 1 $2,404
I $O 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Arch Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $O I $0 1 $p 1 $2
Arch Sections (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $4,807
Arch Details (3 Sheets) $8,839 I I 1 $0
Arch Tension Ties $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,839
1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Arch Tension Tie Details $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $O I $2,946
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 l $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $4,807
Deck Framing. Plan $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
Deck Sections (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
Deck Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 i $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $5,893
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets) $8,839 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $8,839
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets) j $5,893 1 $0 $O I $0 1 $0 I $5,893
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
West Approach Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Superstructure Sections $2,946 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 l $0 1 $2,946
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) $5,893 1 $0
1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
West Approach Deck Sections i $2,946 I $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 I $2,946
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) $5.893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
East Approach Plan and Elevation $2,404 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation $2,404 1 $0 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2404
East Approach Superstructure Sections i $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets) l $4,807 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
East Approach Deck Sections $2,404 1 $0 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $2,404
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) $4,807 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $4,807
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets) i $5,893 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $5,893
9.07 Deliverables l $0 1 $0
1 $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $0
30% FEE Submittal $0 1 $0 1 $o
1 $0 1 $0 I $0
30% PSE Plan Set i $724 I $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $724
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs I $2,998 1 $0 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $2,998
30% PSE QA/QC $10,545 1 $0 1 $0
I $0 I $0 1 $10,545
60% PSE Submittal t $0 1 $0 1 $0
60% PSE Plan Set $724 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0
Specification Outline 1 $0 1 $0 1 1 $0 1
$1,137 1 $0 1 80 1 $0 I $0 1 $1,13,13
7
Updated Quantities and Costs i $2,998 1 $0 I $0 I $0 1 $0 1 $2,998
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments r $672 1 $0 I $0 l $O 1 $0 1 $672
60% PSE QA/QC l $10,545 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $10,545
90% PSE Submittal 1 I 1 I 1
i $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0
90% PSE Plan Set $724 1 $0 1 $0
Draft Specification $6.410 1 1 I $724
1 1 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,410
Updated Quantities and Costs $3,929 1 $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $3,929
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments i $672 1 $0 I $O 1 1 $0 1 $672
90% PSE QA/QC l $9,201 1 $0 I $0
1 $0 1 $0 l $9,201
Final PSE Submittal 1 I 1 I 1
Final PSE Plan Set 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 I $0 $0
i $724 1 $0 I $0 I 1 $0 1 $724
Final Specification 1 $2,223 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $2,223
Final Ouanbbes and Costs $1,602 1 I $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1,602
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments $207 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $207
Final PSE QA/QC i $6,720 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $6,720
Reimbursables $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 $0 1 $0
Subtotall $469,544 $0' $0 $0 s0
.ar;;E .e:;;: ._.....11„„ w i ...a!$..,_ w _....lp'.a
10.0 Bridge Aesthetics Collaboration (LMN)
10.01 BrldV Structure $O 1 $0 1 $0 I $0 1 $O I $0
Arch Geometry 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $19,342 1 $0 1 $19,342
Arch Color j $0 1 I $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Susp Cables 1 $0 I 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Bridge Deck $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $1,012 1 $0 1 $1,012
Connections Abutments $0 1 I 1 $1,012 1 $O 1 $1,012
Connections Tied Arch j $0 1 $0 1 $O 1 $1,012
I $0 1 $1,012
Page 3 of 4
60
KPFF Prime
Management& K
KPFF CIVII K
KPG Ina L
LMN Architects L
Landau Associates G
Grand Total
»tF: W
Structural
k 76547U3a
EOFW t
,2 k
$21$r, 1:52 Y
,'i8883 A 9
92a?1. )I
$7.8675801
_T S
1
1 ,,,mLilcd�«w pHS ,»ai
Page 3 of 4
60
KPFF Consulting Engineers
FEE ESTIMATE: City of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedesblen/Blcycle Bridge
KPFF Prime
Management KPFF Civil KPG Inc. LMN Architects Landau Associates Grand Total
Structural
T I SCOPE OF WORK
Connections Lateral Support
1 $O
$0
1 $0 1
$1,012 1
$0
1 $1,012
1002 Approach Ramps
1 $O
I
$0
$0 I
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Column Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Superstructure Treatments
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Deck Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Earthwall Treatments
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,012 I
$0
1 $1,012
Handrail System
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$1,136 I
$0
1 $1,136
10.03 Draft Basis of Design Document
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 I
$0 I
$0
I $0
10.04 30% Plan Set
1 $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$4,482 1
$0
I $4,482
10.05 30%PSEDebrIef(wlNcIty)
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$1,515 1
$0
1 $1,515
10.06 (Architectural Sheets Design
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Code Sheet
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$2,292 1
$0
1 $2,292
Elevations
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$4,844 1
$0
1 $4,844
Sections (2 sheets)
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$7,079 1
$0
1 $7,079
Connection Details (2 sheets)
I $0
$0
1 $0 1
$7,079 1
$0
1 $7,079
Lighting Coordination
I $0
i
$0
1 $0 1
$3,129 1
$0
1 $3,129
Approach Sections, East
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$5,054 1
$0
1 $5,054
Approach Secitons, West
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$5,054 1
$0
1 $5,054
Handrail Details
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$5,333 1
$0
1 $5,333
Study Model Development
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$6,568 1
$0
1 $6,568
10.07 Final Basis of Design Document
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$0
$0
1 $0
1008 50% Submittal
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0
$0
I $0
60% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$9,446
$0
I $9,446
Outline Spa.
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$7,104 1
$0
I $7,104
60% PSE Debrief (with city)
I $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$1,955
$0
I $1,955
City Comment Review /Response to 30%
1 $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$4,708
$0
I $4,708
1009 90 %Submrctal
1 $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 I
$0
1 $0
90% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
I $0 1
$25,870 1
$0
I $25,870
Draft Specs
I $0
I
$0
1 $0 1
$8,204 1
$0
1 $8,204
90% PSE Debrief (with city)
I $0
I
$0
I $0 1
$1,397 1
$0
I $1,397
City Comment Review /Response to 60%
I $0
I
$0
I $0 I
$5,331 1
$0
I $5,331
10.10 100%Submittal
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
100% Plan Set
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$10,484 1
$0
1 $10,484
Final Specs
I $0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$3,367 1
$0
1 $3,367
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
1 $O
1
$0
1 $0 1
$4,567 1
$0
1 $4,567
Reimbursables
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$2,500 1
$0
$2500
Subtotal
$O
$0
80
$167,955
$0
110 Urban Design and Way Finding
11.01 Illumination
I $O
1
$0
1 $42,607 1
$0 1
$0
1 $42,607
11.02 Wayfinding, Furnishings &Signal
I $0
1
$0
1 $13,382 1
$0 1
$0
1 $13,382
11.03 Landscaping and irrigation
I $0
1
$0
1 $27,879 1
$0 1
$0
1 $27,879
11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies 1 $0
1
$0
1 $17,217 1
$0 1
$0
1 $17,217
Reimbursableat $0
1
$0
1 $500 1
$0 1
$0
1 $500
Subtotal).. $O
1
$0
1 $101,586 1
$0
$O
?.42
.:o;;:,..�. ,:a�I,S,a ...€;w'�. _,..N 20
12.0 Tvpes. Size, and Location Report (Complete)
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
I $0
$0
1
$0
1 $0 1
$0 1
$0
1 $0
Reimbursablesl $0
1
$0
11 1
$0 1
$O
1 $0
Subtotal $0
$0
to
$0 1.
$0
13.0 Sipal Design
13.01 WSDOT Coordination
1
$0
1 $0
1 $8,496 1 $0 1
$0
1 $8,496
13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design
1
$0
1 $0
1 $21,855 1 $0 1
$0
1 $21,855
13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E Baker Blvd.
1
$0
1 $0
1 $4,283 1 $0 1
$0
1 $4,283
Reimbursables)
$0
1 $0
1 $1,000 1 $0 1
$O
1 $1,000
Subtotal
14.0 RlpHOf -WeY Services
14.01 Legal Description
1
$0
1 $0
1 $1,551 1 $0 I
$0
1 $1,551
14.02 Right -of -Way Plan
1
$0
1 $0
1 $9,776 1 $0 I
$O
1 $9,776
14.03 Title Reports
1
$0
1 $0
1 $10,119 1 $0 I
$O
1 $10,119
Reimbursables)
$0
1 $0
1 $2,000 1 $0 1
$0
1 $2,000
Subtotall
15.0 Dolcstruction Support Services
Page 4 of 4
61
FEE ESMMATE CKyo/TukWla
Tukwlls Urban Center, PedeebhR/84d, Bridge
Senor Des gn Design Prol. P
Principal CAO Techni eian Atlmin MuIU
Manager Engneer Engneer ll I Englneerl I CoortlinaWr
2.5846
Task �COPEOFWORK 65001 WOO I 45001 40001 40.001 35.001 20001 18.001 A-b I Cortr Amo rt t
LO ProleG Msnegamemand Adminisb Din
101 Project Schedule 1 I 24.0 1 1 1 I 24.0 12 V- b 1 496243
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements 1 1 4.0 I 1 1 1 1 12.0 1 1,240.61
1.03 Progress Reports 1 12.0 1 I 1 I I 240 1 3.101.52
1.04 Invoices 1 120 I I I 1 I 240 I 8 3101.52
1.05 Team Maetings(ASSUme 12 meetings& 3 City Workshops)
ConsultantMeetlnRSw /City (Assume 12 meeting) 1 1 240 1 240 I 1 1 6.513.19+
Consultant lmernal i,gs(ASSUme meet 1 I 24.0 I 24.0 I I I 6,513.191
Reimbursables
a ueslgn craxl202 DealRn cntera Final
Too,sss -era BOamary Silr-'K &KPFF
102 I�w_;ep7n� iwevi'Fng r�ia�a
l opographic Mapping Phase 2
303 1 SUrvev lase Henew
Y
4.�7 FieFJ�= v"aLdn wry !adios m
402 cefr_v nepbiuny,s ame ��gs
403 nenew of neporz anJwmmenfs
rxarwnm rlcvl r tswn
5U1 Mee[wlN Agenc
5.02 Establish 100 -year 11i 5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
otii in. Ag'>_ ai u a ryN(ice� ion eui� e
6.02 r�fiau.nst
603 eoeai rrograms eu5
6.04
sel�nwidnmenai �i.e nssessmem
6.05 dioaog"., �ssessmeiK7cFrf
606 Inve'sb'gauon
6
6.08 iNe aho /waterway uelmeavon
6.09 po
nei.
610 m wnsvuction uocunien�s
6.11 IlG
6.12 A'quakip u3nas easemem
7.0 Prole tworkshops
7 01 Internal Team PSE Kick-0A Meeting
]02 rSL Renew &Project Kick -0ff Meeting
7.03 Iled Arch Concept Workshop
Tied Arch AlWrnatves Graphics
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
West Approach
East Approach
705 Final Concept Selecton Workshop
Conn -mn Detail Sketches
Sprf- F n sh Examples
Color Examples
So, M.del Development
Sketch Up OualRy RentlerinRS (6)
7.06 Public Outreach
Graphics
8.0 CMI _t 1
8.01 'Con `AkrltsbopandP rrsd Alt Bel lion
802 aloe prep Bla Dsmolition
803 Horlxalhl and Vertkal LmsoiA
Route Layout
Horizontal ConVO1
Ramp VansRlons
Vemcal Alignment
Vehicular Crossingofirail
Rech,nn,lization Baker St
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
Sr. Bndlrig end Psi
Terrain Motlel
Typical Section
Colyd with KCFD and I15ACE
8.05 TESL
806 Surl'so wafer
TIR
Site Damage
"Itabon
8.07 U8a8M
Cityand Private Relocations
Franchise Adq Coortlinatien
Seattle Public UVliry Coordination
808 Olannellnpon and SWng
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Cir Iu Wn Stutly
Rechannelizabon Baker St
809 Coat EAM
30%
6096
90%
Final
8.10 $P llostlom
60960ut1ine
9096 Special Provisions
8.0 1 80
8.0 1 80
8.0 80
I
80 1 8.0
I
I
8.0 1 80
I
I
I
I
8.0 1 80
1 40
1 4.0
80 1
80
160
160 1
1
Subtobl' 0.0 1 48.0 1 48.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 48.0 I 8.D
I$
I$
I$
8
Page 1 of 4
62
'"�IF,xxfi�
x
.E1x.Y�ll�
t
r r
I$
I$
I$
8
Page 1 of 4
62
FEEESRMATE CIycFTukwlla
Tukwll. Urban Cante, Ped.ArmR/Bi%ids Bridge
Page 2 pr 4
63
MulUplie
Phncipal Project
Manager
Senor
Engneer Eng
Des gn
neer II
Design CgDTechnician
Engineer I
Prol
Coortl nator
I Admin
25846
Task SCOPEOFWWK
65001$ WWI 45W I
40.001 40.00I
35.001 20.001 18.00 Relmb
I
C.M tAmount
Final Spe11P n,
I
I
I I
I I
I
B.0 Phmhsats
1
I
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESG Plans (4 sheets)
1
I
I I
I I
I I
Roadwayseotions(lsheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I 1
1 I
I I
Drainage(4shests)
1
I
I
I I
I I
8
Uhhty (3 sheets)
1
I
I
I I
I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
1
I
I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
I
I
I I
I
I
'6oss
1
I I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheers)
I
I I
I 1
I
TESCPIans(4shee[s)
I
I
I
I 1
I
TESC Detad (1 sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I
Roadway3ecnons(1sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I I
PavingDetail(lSheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Drainage(4sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
DrainageDetail(lsheet)
I
I
I I
1 I
I I
UL'l,ty (3sheets)
1
I
1 I
I I
Utility Detail (lsneep
i
1
I
I I
I I
Channelizahon and Signing (4 sheets)
t!
I
I I
I I
Channelization Detal(I sheet)
I
I
1 I
I I
QcReview
1
I
I I
I
I
sots
I
I
I I
I 1
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I
TESCDetell(1Sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Roadwaysections(lsneep
I
I
I
I I
I I
Plan /Profile She.. (3 sheers)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Paving Dined (l sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Drainage(3 She eud
I
i
I I
I
I
Drainage Derail (1 shee0
Utdity(3 sheets)
1
I
I I
I I
I I
unlity Detae(lsheep
1
I
I I
I I
I 1
1
Channelization and Signing (a sheers)
I 1
I I
I I
ChannelizationDetad(Ssheet)
1
I
I I
I
QGReview
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
I 1
I I
I IS
1
1
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheers)
I
1
I
I I
I I
TES' Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I
I I
TESC Detail (isheet)
I
I
I
I I
1 1
Roadwsysest- (lsneet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Plan /Pr one Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I
I
I 1
I I
Paving Dehnl(l sheep
I
I
I
I 1
I I
Drainage(4 sheers)
I
I
I
I I
I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
Utllity(3sheets)
I
I
I
I 1
I I
UtirnDetail(I sheet)
I
I
I
I I
I I
cnanneliza tion and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
cnannelizationDetail(isheep
I
I
I I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
FinaIBldSet
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Site Preparabon (4 sheets)
I
I
I I
I I
I I
TES' Plans (4 sheets)
1
1
I I
I I
I I
TESC Det nl (l sheet)
I
I
I I
I I
I 1
Rpadwaysections(ISheet)
j
1
I I
I I
I 1
Plan/Prpfde She.. (3 sheets)
I
1 1
I I
I I
PavingDeteil(Ssheet)
I
I
I 1
I I
I I
D:inage(4sheete)
I
I
I I
1 I
1
Drainage Detail(lshe)
I
I
I
1 I
I
utility (3sneets)
I
I
I
I 1
I
U[Ility Detad(lsheet)
Channeliza[ionand Signing(4sneets)
cnannelizationDetail(lsneep
I
I
I
I I
1 I
QC Review
I
I
I I
Reimbursables
I
I
I
Sub0otN1
0.0 i '0.0
1 0.0 I
I
0.0 I 0.0 1
I
0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 IE
9.0 5trvtdund E!eimSring(KPFF)
901 Baru aC -Igh
1
1 20
I 4.0 I
I I
I 2.0 I
878.76
9.02 Bndp Daslgn
1
I I
I I
I I
Deep Foundations
1
160
I 80.0 I
800 I I
I I
20.056.50
West Abutment
1
80
I 40.0 I
400 I I
I
10,02825
East Abutment
1
8.0
I 40.0 I
40.0 I I
I
10028.25
Nch Steel Pipes
1
160
I 80.0 I
400 I I
I I
15921.14
Arch Abutment Connections
1
80
1 20.0 I
20.0 I I
I I
563443
Arch Tension Ties
I
160
I 400 I
400 I
I i
11,26886
Arch Miscellaneous COnnecdons
I
80
I 200 I
200 I I
I
5,634.43
Deck Superstructure Framing
I
I 80
I 20.0 I
400 I I
I
7,702.11
Deck slab
1
1 8.0
1 20.0 I
400 I I
I I
770211
Deck Hand Railing
I
1 8.0
20.0 I
400 I I
S
7,70211
Arch Suspension Hangers
I
I 160
I 800
80.0 I
1
20,056.50
903 WotAppmach R-p Deai®1
I
I
I
I
I
ShaftFounda[ions
I
I 16.0
I 40.0 I
400 I i
I
S
11,26886
Concrete Columns
I
I 80
I 400
400 I 1
I I
10.028.25
Structural Earth Walls
I
I 80
1 400
400 1 1
I
1002825
Steel SupersrucWm
I
I 160
I 40.0
40.0 I I
I I
11.26886
Deck Slab
I
I 8.0
I 40.0
40.0 I 1
I I
1002825
Hantl Railings
I
I 80
I 400
40.0 I I
1 I
10,028.25
9.04 Ease Appri Ramp Oaelgn
I
I
I I
I I
I I
Shaft FOunda6pns
I
I 80
I 20.0
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
Concrete Columns
I
I 80
1 20.0 1
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
SVUCtural Earth Walls
I
I 8.0
I 200 I
20.0 1 1
I I
563443
teel SUpersVUd..
I
I 8.0
I 40.0 I
40.0 I I
I I
10.02825
Deck Slab
1
I 8.0
1 20.0 I
20.0 I I
I I
5.634.43
Hand Railings
1
I 80
I 200 I
200 I I
I I
5.634.43
9.05 Mbcellensau sm vitae
1
I
I I
I I
I I
Wayfinding Sign SUppoits and FOUndat ions
1
80
I 240 I
400 I I
I I
8.167.34
Jt,lq Protection Stub,
80
I 400 I
400 I I
I I
10.02625
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
80
I 240 I
400 I I
I I
8.16734
Lighting Supports and Foundations
I
I 80
I 240 I
400 I 1
I I
8.16]34
906 Antir/yeted Sind Uhll Plan Shsb(Sheot Count 159)
1
I
I
I I
I I
Gene2lNOtes and Abbrevib-
1
1 20
40 1
1 1
180 1 1
2,403.68
Page 2 pr 4
63
FEEESTIMATE Citycf Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Ceri Padeetrlary/BI yNa Bridge
Teak 3COPEOFMiORK
General Pan and Elevation
11 --tal Carnal Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutmen[Details
SuPers[mcture Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheeta)
Arch Tension Tees
Arch Tension Tee Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (23heets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Data (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
WestADprOaCh Plan antl Elevation
West Approach Fountlat- Plan and Elevafon
WestApproach Superstructure Sections
WestApproach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
WestApproach Deck Sections
WestApproach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East A P p Plan antl Elevation
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
East Approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Sections
Eas[Approach Deck Details (2 She
Misce llaneous St,, -ms (2 Sheets)
907
SO%PSESUbmtW
30% PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantties and Costs
30 %%EQA/QC
60%PSESubmabal
60%PSE Plan Set
Specifcaton 0utire
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60 PSE QA/QC
B0% PSE Submftfal
9096 PSE Plan Set
Draft Specification
Updated Q-ties and Costs
Responses t0 City 60% PSE Comments
9096 PSE QA/QC
Flnal PSE SU kttal
Finel PSE Plan Set
Final Specif h-
Final Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 9096 PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
Principal
Project
Senor
Desgn
Design CADTechnicean
Prol.
--in
M"
Engneer Engneer
ll
Engneer)
Coordnatar
65001 WWI 45001
40001 40.001$
35.001
20.001 1800
I 20 I 4.0 I
1 I
240
I 20 I 4o
1 I
240 I
I
I 40 I 80 I
I 1
480 I
I
I 2.0 I 4.0
1 1
180 I
I
I 2.0 I 40
I I
18o I
I
I 2.0 1 40 1
I I
240 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
180 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
240 I
I
I 20 I 40
1 1
180 I
I
I 2.0 I 40
I 1
240 I
I
I 20 40
1 I
240 I
I
I 40 1 80
I 1
360 I
I
1 6.0 I 120
1 1
720 I
I
I 20 I 40
1 I
240 I
I
1 20 1 40
I I
240 I
I
1 40 1 80
I I
360 1
1
1 2.0 1 4.0 I
I I
240 I
I
I 40 I 8.0
I I
360 I
I
I 40 8.0 I
I
480 I
I
I 60 I 120 I
I
720 I
I
I 40 I 8.0 I
1 I
480 I
I
1 40 1 80 I
I I
480 I
I
I 40 1 SO I
I I
480 I
I
I 20 40 I
I 1
240 I
I
I 20 I 40 1
i 1
240 I
I
20 40 I
1 1
240 1
1
I
I 40 I SO I
I
48.0 I
I
I 20 I 40 I
I I
240 I
I
40 I 60 I
1 1
48.0 I
I
20 I 40 I
I I
18.0 I
I
I 20 40 I
1 I
180 I
I
I zo 40 I
I I
1e.o I
I
40 1 8.0 I
1 I
360 I
I
1 20 4.0 I
1 1I
180 I
I
1 40 1 8.0 I
I
360 I
I
1 40 1 80 I
I I I
I I
48.0 1
I
I
I
I I I
I
I 1
I 1
I
80
I
I
I 240 I
I 1
40 I
320 I 240 I
I I I
I I
I I
160 1
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I I
I I
I
8.0
I
I
1 8.o I
I I
4. I
I 24.0 1
1 1
I
40 I
t 1 4.0 I
I 1
40 I
320 I 24.0 I I
I I I
I I
I 1
160
I
I
I
I I I
I I
1 1
1 I
I
8.0 I
I
I
I 1 48.0 I
I I
1
160 I
I 32.0 I
1 I
I
40 I
I 4.0 I
1 1
40 I
240 I 240 I I
1 I 1
I I
1 I
160
I
I
I
I I I
i I
I I
I
80
I
I
I I 12.0 I
1 I
I
16 o I
I I 120 I
I I
40 I
I 1
I I
4.0 I
240 1 80 I
I I
16.0 I
I
I I I I I I I I I
Subtabal l 1120 1 454.0 1 1340.0 1 1040.0 1 0.0 1 1273.0 1 66.0 1 0.0 1
-0 Magebetrotln CallabonNIM(LMN)
1001 Btdga SbveWro
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections Susp Cables
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections Tiad Arch
Connections Lateral SU pport
10.02 approach Ram p.
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Eart .11 Treatments
H androil System
10.03 Dreg Basle of Deslgl Document
10.04 30%plan Set
1005 30% PSE DeMIe!(wgh -M
10.06 Nchit lanm Shams /Daslgn
Code Sheet
Elevators
Sections (2 sheets)
Correct- Details (2 aheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections. East
Approach Secitons. West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
1007 Flrel Buis of Deeigi Document
1008 60%SubmMM
W% plan Set
Outline Spars
50% PSE Debrief (with city)
Cty Comment Review Response to 30%
3009 9D%Submitm
9096 Plan Set
Draft Spars
9096 PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 6096
10.10 SOD96SubmMel
100% Plan Set
F- ISpecs
Multiplier
2.5846
Re,ni 1 Cart tAhrount
294644
294644
5892.89'
2403.68
2,403.68
2,94644
2.403.68 I
2,94644'
2.403 56
294644
2,94644
480736
8,839.33
294644
294644,
4 807.36 I
2946.441
4807.361
5892891
8,839.331
5,892.891
5,892.891
5892891
2946441
2946441
2,946.441
5,892.891
2,946.441
5,892.891
2403681
2403661
2403681
4,80736
2,403 68
480736
5892.89,
72369
299814,
30.545171
723.69
1.137.22
?99814
67200
10.545.17
72369
6.409.81
3,92859
67200.
9.201.181
72369
2.22276
1602 45
2 77
6,719.96,
I
8
Page 3 of 4
64
FEEETIMATE CiyofTuk*la
Tukwlle Urban Carrier, Pedsebiary3myde Bldg.
't G�dEI_,I Pro et Seri or I Des I Design I P J Mulbpl
PrinclPel fe gin CAD Technician Admin`
Manager Engneer Engineer 11 Engneerl Coordnator
2.5846
Teak EOF4pfd( 1 65.001 S WM I 45.001 S 40001 40.001 35001E 20.001 1800 Relmb. Cnnberl AmourE
City comment Reyiew /Reaponaa tp 9o%
110 Urban Da l9a and Wav Madna
11.01 Illumination
1102 Wayfnding. FUrnlshinRS &Swat
1103 Landscaping and lrng..n
11.04 Walkway Selection /Packing Lot T-1 Alignment Studies
120 Time. siis. end Lecetlon Report(COmdebi
13.0 Signal Design
13 01 1 WSDOT Ooordnetion
13.02 IPedeatuan signal Across West Valley Highway Design
13.03 ISign.1 MOddications at Andover Park E &Baker El.
C
14.0 1111 of- WeySeMces
14.01 1Legal Description
14.02 IRightot Way Plan
14.03 fide Reports
15.0 Conatrucllonsupamservicee
Sublumli
0.0 1
0.0 1
0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0 1
0.0
1 00
1 0.0
I
I
I
1
I
I I
1
1
I
I
g
Reimbursables
I
V
Subtomll
0.0 I'
0.0 '1
O.O. I
0.0
1 00 1-
0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0
1
I
I
I
I
I I
g
Reimbursables
1
Subbdal�
0.0 I
0.0 1
0.0
0.0 I
0.0
1 0.0.
,ursable.
Subtpblo 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
F I I I I I I 1
Page 4 of 4
65
FEE ESTIMATE Ci9f of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center,'....,, 'Bigdo Bddge
^Y1 k Principal Project Senior Project Design Proj Admin Multiplier C'1
_l- CADTechnician Manager Engineer Engineer Engineer Coordinator
2.5846
Task ISCOPEOFWORK 65W I 50001 50.001 42.001 38.001 35001 22001 1800 Rama, I ComroetAmount
naau'x,a ttkr: ee Vous essoes ,t^ttan iatx 1 ah' 1 drltlhrzx at, ia�,..t tax .a�ax Ix kilo a i� x xia vx.'ea,ti: n i�xl[.
l0 Proieot Managemem end AdmIinisbetion
101 Projec[SChedule I I I I I I I I
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I I I I I I
1.03 Progress Reports 1 I I I I I I
104 Incas I I I I I I I I
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) I I I I I I I
Consultant Meetings w City (Assume 12 meeting) I I 180 I I I 1 2.326.14+
Consultant Internal Meetings(Awume 12 meeting) I I 240 I I I I 3.101521
Subtotal: 0.0.. 1 42.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
2.0 Design Crdene Occurrent
2101 Design Criteria Draft 1 I 80 I I 240 I 1 80 I 4094.011
202 Design Criteria Final I 1 6.0 I I 16.0 I 1 4.0 I 2.998.141
Reimburaamea LINMENEWONOM I I
Subtotal 0.0 1 18.0 1 0.0 1 40.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 12.0 1 0.0 is I 7.09214 1
a
3.0 TOpcgephic and Boundary Survav (KPG &KPFFdril)
3.01 Topographic Map ping Phase 1 I I 1 I I I I I
302 Topographic Map ping Phase2 1 I I I I 1 I1 l I 1
303 Survey Base Review I 16.0 1 1 160 1 1 80 I I 4,528221
1 I 1� I I III I Ir¢::yl
Subtotal: 0.0 1 16.0 I 0.0 16.0 I 0.0 1 8.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 1E 4528.22
4.0 Geoteohnlcal Research act Reoommarldatlorm ,mom
401 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
4 02 Cattechnical Evaluahon. Reporting, and Meetings 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I
4.03 Review of Reportand Comments 1 I 160 1 I I I I 20 I 2.18140
1
1 I
I
I I I I
I 'I)�I'li +'dp {:euiµ':'.
e•. rxn +.lo...:...
Subtotal
Subtotal I 0.0 I
18.0 1
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 2.0
I 0.0 I
2,18140
v,..
„u ,ui39 ,mR,rk,s,4,u 5xm, .um:,wmbmu;�'�silki n,r=,
6.0 Erw in onmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Qvil)
m. talsi
8.0 Hydroullce(KPFli
601 Team. Agency. and Pre Application Meetings 1
I I I
501 Meetwth Agencies
1 I
160 I
I I I 16.0 I
I
3.51506'
502 Establish 100 year Floodplaln
I I
160 I
1 4.0 I I 16.0 I
1
3,949.27
503 Establish Struct ural Clearance
1 1
80 1
1 I I I 80
1
1.48873
1
I I I
I 1
40.0
1 I
48.0
Subtotal
0.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 1
4.0 1 0.0
32.0
I 8.0 1 0.0 1 8 I
8,953.05
,,emu ='a l "Uii ni ^,";i4:' ,8,u,,:,
„u ,ui39 ,mR,rk,s,4,u 5xm, .um:,wmbmu;�'�silki n,r=,
6.0 Erw in onmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Qvil)
7.0 Proied Workshops
601 Team. Agency. and Pre Application Meetings 1
I I I
I I
I I
6.02 SERA Checklist I
I 4 C I I
I 160
1 I
1
2,088.36
603 WSDOT Local Programs ECS 1
I 4.0 I I
80 1 I
702 TSL Review& Project Kick-Off Meeting
I
1.385.35
6.04 Phase l Environmental Site Assessment 1
I I I
1 1
I I
I
I 1
605 Biological AssessmenVEFH I
I 4.0 I I
160 1 I
16.0
I 1
3.701.15
6.06 Cultural Resources Investigation I
I I
I I
I I
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphic
607 Shoreline Permit I
1 4.0 I
80 1 1
80
1 1
j$1
2.10903
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation I
I I
I I
704 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
I I
I 8.0 I I
6.09 Cntical Areas Report 1
I 8.0 1
80 I I
16.0
I I
3.34964
610 Mitigator, Onstruction Documents 1
1 I
I I
I I I
1 I
I I
611 IARPA I
I 4.0 I
I I
80
I 1
1.240.61
6.12 Aquatic Lands Easement I
1 I I
I 1
I 1
1 1
I I
Reimbursables
7.05 Fi nal Concept Selection Workshop
Page 1 of 4
66
Subtotal)
0.0 1 2S.0 1 0.0 1
40.0
I 16.0 1
48.0
1 0.0 1 0.0
1
Y
13.874.13
V, r�adan'l A, a,,,,, a:, m;'p, ,,,,,:t
a.y. him
u a
v a,. a,
7.0 Proied Workshops
701 Internal Teem PSI Ki11-011 Meeting
1
1 8.0 I I
1 I
I I
1,03384
702 TSL Review& Project Kick-Off Meeting
1
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
1.03384
703 Tied Arch Concept Workshop
I
1 8.0 I
I I
I I
1,03384
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphic
I
I 1 1
I I
I 1
704 West and East Approach Concept Workshop
I
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
1.03384
West Approach
I
I I I
I I
I I
East Approach
I
I I I
I 1
I I
7.05 Fi nal Concept Selection Workshop
I
I 80 I I
I I
I I
1,033.84 1
on
Cnect ion Detail Sketches
I
I I I
I I
I I
1
Surface Finish Examples
I
I I I
I I
I I
I
Color Examples
Studv Model Development
I
I I I
I I
I I
Sketch Up Quality Renderings (6)
1
I I I
I
I I
706 Public Duties on
1
I 8.0 I I
I I
I I
103384
Graphics
1
I I
I I
I I
Reimbursable s
8ubtomlY
0.0 I 48.0 1 0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0 I
0.0
I 0.0 1 0.0
I S
6,20304
8.0 CMI Erl1direi
801 Concept Workshop and Prefertetl A&Seloodon
1
1 16.0 1
160
I 1
160
1 40 I
I
5479.351
802 Site Prep and Demolition
I
I 80 I I
160
I 160 1
I I
1
4342131
8 03 Horizontal and Vartkel Layout
I
I I I
I
I I
1.
I
Route Layout
I
1 8O I 1
80
1
I I
1
1,902271
Horizontal Control
I
1 4.0 I 1
80
1 I
I I
1,385.351
Ramp transitions
1
1 8.0 I I
1 160 1
I 1
2.605.281
Vertical Ahgnment
I
I 8.0 I
40
1 40 I
I I
,.6
Vehicular Crossing of Tre it
I
1 8.0 I
80
1 80 1
I I
2,687.981
Rechannelizatien Baker St
I
I 160 1
16.0
1 80 1
160
1 1
6037631
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
I
1 160 1 1
160
1 16.0 1
160
I I
6,823.341
804 Smiling and Paving
I
I I 1
I I
I I
Terrain Model
I
1 40 1 1
80
I 16.0 I
I 1
2.956.78
Typical Section
I
I 80 1 1
I 8.0
I 1
1,819.56
Cc rd with KCFD and USACE
I
I 16.0 I 1
I 2 0 I
80
I 1
2.98780
805 RSC
1
I 16.0 I I
I 320 I
I
5,210.55
806 8urroce Water
1
I I I
I
I I
T
1
40 1 16.0 1 I
320
I
160
160 I
8,570 53,
Site Drainage
I
I 160 1 1
16.0
I 411
I 1
4,197.391
Infiltration
1
I 80 1 1
16.0
1 80 1
8.0
I I
4.280.10'
807 Uli
I I I
I
1 1
City and Pnvate Relocations
M
I 80 I
I 16.0
I I
2.605.28
Franchise Utility Coordination
I
I 8.0 1 I
I 80 I
1 I
1.81956,
Page 1 of 4
66
FEEESTIMATE Cibeff kxlle
Tukwila Urban Center, PedeeVian/Bi yc a Bridge
4 IE11gfUli rRJ
Senior
Pro)ect
Design
P", j
Multlplle
Y.
Princi pal
pal
Manager Engineer
Engineer
CAD
Engineer
Techn cian
Coordinator
Admin
k ti
25846
Teak �PEOF WORK
6500 5000 5000
1 I
4200 3800
1 1 1
3500 1
22001 1800
Reimb
Coma ctAmount
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
1
1 160 I
1 16.0 1
16.0 I
4.0 I
531394
808 Cie mellutlon and signing
I
I I
1
1 1
I
I
ParkingLetRevisions
1
1 160 1
I 160
1 32.0 1
4.0 1
7,174.85
Roadway Signing
I
1 1
I
1 2.0 1
1
19643
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study 1
1 16.0 1
I 160
1 160 I
80 I
1
609966
Rechannelization Baker St
I 8.0 I
I 8.0
160 I
80 I
4,19739
809 cox Ea6meta
I I
I
I
I
30%
1 20
1 8.0 1
1
1 160 1
1
1
2.94127
60%
I 20
I 120 1
1
1 320 1
I
1
5.029.631
90%
I 20
1 8.0 I
1 8.0
1 160 1
I
380970
Final
I 1.0
I 8.0 I
8.0
I 160 I
I
I
3,641.70
s So $pedfleatrons
I
I I
I I
I
60 %0u1
I
I 8.0 I
I
I I
I
I
1033.84
90% Special Provisions
I 10
1 160 I
1 120
1
80 1
399321
Final Special Provisions
1 2.0
I 16.0 I
I 8.0
1
8.0 I
3.72699
811 Plin heels
1
I I
I
1
I
30%
1
I I
I
I
I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
1
I 4.0 I
1
I 16.0 1
16.0 1
1
3.535.73
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
I
1 20 1
1
I 160 1
16.0 I
I
3,277.27
Roadway Secuons(1 sheet)
1
1 4.0 1
1 2.0
1 8.0 1
80 1
1
2,243.43
ee
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 shts)
I
I 1.0 1
1 80
1 80 1
160 1
1
3,23075
Drainage (4 sheets)
1
1 8.0 1
1 16.0
1 1
160 1
1
4,21807
Urnity (3 sheets)
I
I 1.0 1
1 2.0
1 8.0 1
so 1
1
1,85534
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets)
I
1 1.0 1
1
1 160 1
16.0 1
1
3,14804
QC Review
I 8.0
I 160 1 8.0
I I
160 I
535529
I I
I
1
'60%
1
I 1 I
I I
I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 1
1 120 1
160 1
1
2.88441
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
1
1 10 I
120 1
160
i
2.755.18
TESC Detail U. sheet)
I
1 10 I
8.0 1
16.0 1
I
2.362.32
Roadway Sections (I sheet)
1
1 2.0 1 1
80 1
80 1
1
1.767.87
Plan /Profile Shaets(3 sheets)
1
1 1.0 1 I
8.0
16.0 I
160 I
1
401647
Paving D-I(I sheet)
I
I 4.0 1 1
1 80 1
80 I
1
2.026.33
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
I 4.0 1 1
160
1 1
160 1
1
3.701.15
Drainage octal (I sheet)
I
1 20 1 1
8.0
I 1
80 I
I
185057
ULhty(3 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 1
1 80 1
80
I
1,767.87
Utility octal (I sheet)
I
I 20 1 1
1 8.0 1
so
1
1.76787
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I 40 I I
1 16.0 1
160
1
1 3,53573
Channelization Detail D. sheet)
I 1.0 I
I 8.0 I
80
I
1638.64
QC Review
I 4.0
1 16.0 1 160 1
1
16.0 1
It 5.717.14
I I
I
I
90%
I
I
I 1
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 10 I
120 1
120
1
239334
TESC Plane (4 sheets)
1
1 10 I
8.0 1
16.0
1
2.36232
TESC octal (1 sheet)
I
I 10 I
40 1
80 I
1
1.24578
Roadway Section, (I sheet)
I
1 1.0 1 1
80 I
80 I
1.638.64
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
1
1 1.0 I 1
16.0 1
16.0 1
1
3.14804
Paving Detail D. Sheet)
1
1 1.0 I 1
I 80 I
80 I
I
1,638.641
Drainage (3 sheets)
I
1 30 1 1
4.0
1 1
160 1
1
2.010821
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
1
I 2.0 1 1
80
1 1
80 I
I
1.850.57 1
Utility (3 sheets)
I
1 2.0 1 I
1 8.0 1
80 I
I
1.767.87
Utility Detail (I sheet)
1
1 20 1 1
1 80 I
80
1
176787
Channelnabon and Sig rnng(4 sheets)
I
I 4.0 1 1
1 16.0 1
160 1
1
3,53573
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
I
I 10 1
I 80 I
80
1
1,638.64
QC Review
1 40
1 16.0 16.0
I
80 1
5.262.25
I I I
I I
I
I
100%
I
I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4sheets)
I
I 10 I
20 I
20
I
50658
TESC Plane (4 sheets)
1
1 1.0 1 I
2.0 1
20 I
1
506.58
TESC Detail (I sheet)
I
I 10 I I
40 I
2.0 I
II
70301
Roadway Sections(1 sheet)
1
1 1.0 I I
2.0 1
20 1
1
506.58
Plan /Profile Sheet, (3 sheets)
I
I 30 I I
1 80 1
8.0 1
1
1.638.64
Paving Detail U. sheet)
1
1 1.0 I I
1 8.0 1
8.0 1
1
1.63864
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
1 1.0 I I
20
I I
40 I
I
708.18
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
1
1 2.0 1 1
4.0
1 1
80 1
1
1,416.36
Utility (3 sheets)
1
1 20 I I
I a0 I
80 I
I
1.76787
Utility Detail (I sheet)
1
i 2.0 1 1
1 8.0
80 1
1
1.76787
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
I 2.0 I I
I 8.0 I
80 I
I
1,76787
Channelization Detail D. sheet)
I
1 1.0 1 1
1 10 I
20 1
1
40837
QC Review
I 20
1 80 I 1
1 1
80 1
182473
I I
I I
I
Final Bid Set
I
I I I
I I
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I
1 1.0 I I
I 1
30 1
I
400611
TESC Pier (4 sheets)
1
1 1.0 I
I 1
20 1
I
310.15
TESC Detail U. sheet)
I
I 1.0 I I
I 1
10 1
1
21969
Roadway Secuons(l sheet)
1
1 1.0 I
I 1
10
1
219.69
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
I to I
I 1
30
1
40061
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
I
1 10
I 1
10 I
1
219.69.
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
1 SO
I I
30
I
400.611
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
I
1 2.0
I I
10 I
I
348.92
Utility (3 sheets)
1
1 20 I I
1 1
30 1
1
529.84
Unity Detail(: Sheet)
I
1 2.0 I I
I I
1.0 I
I
34892
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
I
1 20 I I
I I
6.0 I
1
801.23
Channelization Detail (I sheet)
1
1 30 1 1
1 I
1.0 1
1
21969
QC Review
I 2.0
I I I
1 I
80 1
1
1,05969
Reimbursables
1
1
Subtotal: 34.0
477.0 I 40.0 1
31$.0
I 647.0 I
580.0 I
920 I 0.0 4a
228,28738
{I.=.=ft i 5.. H
9.0 structural EriglmerlM(KPFF)
901 BaabafDmign
I
I I I
I I
1
1
I
902 Bridge Desk
I
I I I
I I
I
I
Deep Foundations
I
I I I
1 I
I
westAbutment
I
I I
I I
I
East Abutment
I
I I
I I
I
I
Arch Steel Pipes
I
I I
I I
I
I
Arch AbutmentConneciona
I
I
I I
I
Arch Tension Ties
I
I I
I I
I
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
I
I I
I I
I
DecksuperatrunureFraming
I
I I
I I
I
Deck Slab
I
I I
I
I
I
Dec< Railing
1
I I
I I
I
I
I
Arch Suspension Hangers
I I I
I I
I
I
1
903 WmtApproech RampDmigp
I
I I I
I I
1
I
Page 2 of 4
67
FEEESTIMATE Cltyof1rukwile
Tukwila Urban Center. PeEestrlaryBicycle Saki
a Project Senor Project Des Prof. in
I Multip liar t
Princpal CADTechncan Atlm ff
Manager Engineer Engineer Engi Coo duator
Tank SOOPEOFWORK
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
904 E.ApproeM Ramp Dmir
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
SteelSuperstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
905 MlxellanemsSWtSurm
WayFndng5gn Supports and Foundations
Utility Protection Structures
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
Lighting Supports and Foundations
9C6 NNdpatea Structural Plan Sheeta(SheatCount t58)
General Notes and Abbreviations
General Plan and Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
FoundaUOn Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan antl Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation 12 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connector Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vert cal Support Sect ors (2 Sheets)
Deck Vert cal Support Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Plan and Elevation
Wast Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
West Approach Superstructure Sect ors
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Deck Sections
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Plan and Elevat on
East Approach Found at on Plan and Elevation
East Approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Detals(2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Se Mons
East Approach Deck DeIa Is (2 Sheats)
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
907 Mkhmebka
3D%PSESubmittal
30 %PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
30% PSE QA/QC
60% PSE Submittal
60 %PSE Plan Set
Spa af t Outline
Updated Quantities and Casts
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60% PSE QA/QC
g0%PSESubmittal
90% PSE Plan Set
Dr.ft5p.c,f,cat,cn
Updated Quanttes and Costs
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
90% PSE QA /QC
Anal PSE Submittal
F nal PSE Plan Set
Final Specification
Final Quantities and Costs
Rest City 90% PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
1001 Brklae3bucturo
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections -SUSp Cables
Gann on entlge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections -Tied Arch
Connections Lateral Support
10.02 Approach Rempe
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Fend —,l Treatments
Handrail System
10.03 Draft Bei of De i Document
10.04 3D% plan Set
10.05 30% PSE Set
10 CiM
65.001 50001
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
50001$
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
42001$ 38001$
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I i
I I
I t
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
I 1
I 1
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
35001$
2.5846
22001 18.00 Reimb Contact Am unt
Subtotal( 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 IY
Page 3 of 4
M.;
(I
a
�Ml
JIrA
i
H
t
1�
J
a
�1
FNL,
H
t
�Aa
tilt
rl
t
5
Subtotal( 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 '1 0.0 I. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 IY
Page 3 of 4
M.;
FEEESTIMATE Cttyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedesbier/Blcycle Bridge
Teak 50OPEOFWORK
1006 ArchEactuml Sheab /Design
Code Sheet
Elevations
Sections (2 sheets)
Connection Details (2 sheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections, East
Approach Secitons, West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
10.07 Final Besb of Design Document
10.08 60%Submittal
60% Plan Set
Outline Specs
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 30%
10.09 90%Submmal
90% Plan Set
Draft Specs
90% PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comm ent Review /Response to 60%
10.10 100%Submiflal
100% Plan Set
Final Specs
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
1 I I I I I I I
Subtotal' 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0
u.o Urban Design and We Finding!
1101 Illumination 1 I I I I I I
11.02 Wayfinding, Fur nisrings &Signal 1 I I I I I 1 I
1103 Landscaping and Irrigation I I I I I I
11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies I I I I I I I
Page 4 of 4
69
Subtotal)
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
I 0.0 1
0.0
1 0.0
1 E
'°.,.�._r- ���3
12.0 Types, Sl[e,eM Lautlan Report (Complete)
t
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
I
Reimbursables
1
Subtotal I
0.0 1 O.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0
I 0.0 I
OA
I 0.0
lE
..3ti Ana
13.0 Siptel 020
1301 WSDOT Coordination
r
1 I I I
I
I
1302 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Highway Design
1
I I I
1
I
1303 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E &Baker Blvd,
1
I I I I
I
I
Reimbursables
I
I I I I
Subtatall
00 1 00 00 I 0.0 i. 0.0_..
1 0.0 1
0.0
1. 0.0
mm P ..�yy».
14.0 Rlghtcf ...Z ea
1401 Legal Description
1402 Right of -Way Plan
1
I I I I
I I I I
I
I I
I
I
1
1403 Title Reports
1
I I I 1
I I
I
Reimbursables
I
I
1
Subtotal'.
0770 1 0.0 I 0.0 I OA
1 0:0 1
0.0.
I 0.0
Page 4 of 4
69
FEEES71MATE City oTTukwila
Tukwila Urban Comer, Padestrian/Bloyde Bridge
LU+G' Seri or Project Designer CAD Survey Office Multipl
UD /LA Sury I LA/Survey l Technician) Crew Admin 2881745
Task ISCOPEOFWORK «M. 64.901 56.561 40.131 31.251 47.661 23.08 Reimb I ComractAmoum
1.0 Prolact Management and AdrMnlstration
1.01 Project Schedule
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements
1.03 Progress Reports
1.04 Invoices
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops)
Consultant Meetings w/ City (Assume 12 meeting)
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting)
I I I I I
I I I I I I S
I I I I I I
I I I I I I M
1 450 I I 1 45.0 I I
I I I I I I
I I I I
iursables 250.00
1 45.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 13
Subtotail 45.0 I 0.0 I O.0 ETI
12,468.59
25000
2.0 Do" Critede Doeumem
2.01 Design Criteria Draft
2.02 Design Criteria Final
Reimbursables
1 I
I I
I
B btotal: 0
00 0
00 I 0
00 I
I UO I
I 00 4 0
00 1�
3.0 To oh1. and BoundarvSurvey IKPG &KPFF CIvin
3.01 Topographic Mapping Phase l 1
1 1
1 4
4.0 1 6
6.0 I
I 50.0 I
I 90.0 I
1
18,209.52
3.02 Topographic Mapping Phase 2 1
1 1
1 2
2.0 1 3
3.0 1
1 30.0 1
1 48.0 I
9
9,967.06
3.03 Survey Base Review 1
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Reimbursables
3
3,500.00 3
3,500.00
Subtotal! 0
I I
I
9.0 I
I 80.0 I
I 195.0 I O
O.0 t S
3.500.00 3
31,676.58
4.0 G sobs hnlul Rasaarcii and Recommendatioas
4.01 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing
4.02 Geotechnical Evaluation, Reporting and Meetings
4.03 Review of Report and Comments
Reimbursables
Subtotal1 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 I
I
I 0.0 0
0.0 S
m w:wdrx.xm
5.0 HvdrauII.1KPFFCivin
5.01 Meetwith Agencies
5.02 Establish 100 -year Floodplaln
5.03 Establish Structural Clearance
Reimbursables
1 I
I
Y
Subtotal O
O.O I O
O.O I O
O.O 1
1
0.0 I
I 0.0 I 0
0.0 S
8.0 Environmemal and Permitting Services (Landau KPFF Cltd9
6.01 Team, Agency, and Pre Application Meetings
6.02 SEPA Checklist
6.03 WSDOT Local Programs ECS
6.04 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
6.05 Biological Assessment/EFH
6.06 Cuhural Resources Investigation
6.07 Shoreline Permit
6.08 Wetland/Waterway Delineation
6.09 Critical Areas Report
6.10 Mitigation Construction Documents
6.11 IARPA
6.12 4quatic Lands Easement
Reimbursables
I I
0.0 I 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 I
I I
I
0.0 Is
�6
7.0 ProlectWorkshope
7.01 Internal Team PSE Kick-Off Meeting I
I 4
4.0 1 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1
1,210.68
7.02 TSL Review& Project Kick Of Meeting 1
1 4
4.0 I 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1
1,210.68
7.03 Tied Arch Concept Workshop I
I 4
40 I I
I I
I I
I
748.10
Tied Arch Alternatives Graphics
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop I
I 4
4.0 I 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I
1,210.68
West Approach
EastApproach
7.05 Final Concept Selection Workshop
4
4.0 1 1
1 4
4.0 I
I I
I I
1,210.681
Connection Detail Sketches
Surface Finish Examples
Color Examples
Study Model Development
Sketch Up Quality Renderings I6)
Y
7.06 Public Outreach 1
1 1
1 1
1 I
I I
I I Y
Y
Graphics I
I I
I I
I 1
1 I
I
Reimbursables
I I I
Subtotall 20.0 1 0.0 1 SB.o
8.01 Concept Workshop and Profensd Alt Selection
8.02 Site Prep and Demolition
8.03 Hodzamal and Vertical layout
Route Layout
Horizontal Control
Ramp transitions
Vertical Alignment
Vehicular Crossing of Trail
Rechannelization Baker St
Riverview Plaza Driveway Reconstruction
8.04 Grading and Paving
Terrain Model
Typical Section
Coord with KCFD and USACE
8.05 T6RC
8.06 Surface Water
TIP
Page 1 of 4
70
PEE ESTIMATE city of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Carter, Pedeetrlart/Bloyde Bridge
60% I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) 1
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review 1
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
Paving Detail (1 Sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets) 1
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets) 1
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review I
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1
QC Review
Final Bid Set I I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I 1 I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I I I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I I I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
QC Review I I I I I
Survey Office Multiplier
I
Crew I Admin 2881145
47.66 I 23.08 Reimb I CorltractAmoum
s
S
5
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
Y
3
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Y I I I I I
Subtotal1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
0W.":
9.0 Stnactural Engbeedng(KPFF)
901 Saab or Daalgrl 1 I I I 1 I
9.02 Bridge Design 1 I I I I I
Deep Foundations I I I I I I
Page 2 of 4
71
Senor Project Designer CAD
Sury LA/Survey ITachriciarl
Task SCOPE OF WORK
64.901 56.56 I 40,131 31,251
Site Drainage 1
I I I I
Infiltration I
I I I I
8.07 UBlmea I
I I I I
City and Private Relocations I
I I I I
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Public Utility Coordination
I I 1 I
8.08 Channelzation and Signing 1
I I I I
Parking Lot Revisions I
I I I I
Roadway Signing I
I I I I
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I
I I I I
Rechannelization Baker St I
I I I I
809 Cost Estimate
30% I
I I I
60% I
I I I I
90% I
I I I I
Final I
I I I I
8.10 Spedlicati.. I
I 1 I 1
60% Outline I
I I I I
90% Special Provisions I
I I I I
Final Special Provisions I
I I I I
8.11 Pianaheft I
I I I I
30% I
I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I I 1
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) I
I I I 1
QC Review I
I I I I
60% I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) 1
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review 1
90%
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
Paving Detail (1 Sheet)
Drainage (3 sheets) 1
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets) 1
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet)
QC Review I
100%
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
TESC Plans (4 sheets)
TESC Detail (1 sheet)
Roadway Sections (1 sheet)
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
Paving Detail (1 sheet)
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet)
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets)
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) 1
QC Review
Final Bid Set I I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I I 1 I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I I I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) 1 I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I I I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I I I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I I I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I I I I I
QC Review I I I I I
Survey Office Multiplier
I
Crew I Admin 2881145
47.66 I 23.08 Reimb I CorltractAmoum
s
S
5
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
Y
3
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
Y I I I I I
Subtotal1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
0W.":
9.0 Stnactural Engbeedng(KPFF)
901 Saab or Daalgrl 1 I I I 1 I
9.02 Bridge Design 1 I I I I I
Deep Foundations I I I I I I
Page 2 of 4
71
FEE ESTIMATE CWq of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center. Pedesttan/BW1 Bridge
KPB W Sen or I Project I Designer I CAD
UD /LA Su, LA/Survey Technician
Tesk SCOPE OF WORK 64.901$ 56.56 I 40.13 I 31.25
9.03
9.04
9.05
9.06
9.07
West Abutment
East Abutment
Arch Steel Pipes
Arch Abutment Connections
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Miscellaneous Connections
Deck Superstructure Framing
Deck Slab
Deck Hand Railing
Arch Suspension Hangers
WwtAppro nsh Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
East Approach Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
Concrete Columns
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
Deck Slab
Hand Railings
Miacellanaow Structures
Way6nding Sign Supports and Foundations
Utility Protection Structures
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
Lighting Supports and Foundations
Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count 358)
General Notes and Abbreviations
General Plan and Elevation
Horizontal Control Plan
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
Foundation Layout
Pile Details
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
West Abutment Details
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
East Abutment Details
Superstructure Layout
Arch Plan and Elevation
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
Arch Tension Ties
Arch Tension Tie Details
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
Deck Framing Plan
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Layout (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Plan and Elevation
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
West Approach Superstructure Sections
west Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
West Approach Deck Sections
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Plan and Elevation
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
East approach Superstructure Sections
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
East Approach Deck Sections
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
3096 PSE Submittal
30% PSE Plan Set
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
30% PSE QA/QC
SO%PSESubmitral
60 %PSE Plan Set
Specification Outline
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 30% PSE Comments
60% PSE QA/QC
90%PSESubmitral
90% PSE Plan Set
Draft Specification
Updated Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
90% PSE QA/QC
Final PSE Submittal
Final PSE Plan Set
Final Specification
Final Quantities and Costs
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments
Final PSE QA/QC
10.0
(LMNQ
Subtotal 0.0
Survey I Office
Crew Admin
47,661 23.08
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Multiplier'
2881745
Reimb. ComradAmount
S
Y
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
Y
S
S
S
S
g
S
S
a
Y
1
S
S
S
Y
S
S
S
S
Y
S
S
1
1
S
)g
Page 3 of 4
72
FEEESTIMATE C4of Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedeetrian/Bkyde Bridge
Tesk SCOPE OF WORK
30 11 Bridge Structure
Arch Geometry
Arch Color
Connections Susp Cables
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments
Connections Tied Arch
Connections Lateral Support
10.02 Approach Ram.
Column Treatments
Superstructure Treatments
Deck Treatments
Earthwall Treatments
Handrail System
1003 Draft Besla of Design Document
10.04 3096PI,ISH
10.05 SM PSE Debrief (with ii"
10.06 krohkectural Shaft Design
Code Sheet
Elevation.
Sections (2 sheets)
Connection Details (2 sheets)
Lighting Coordination
Approach Sections, East
Approach Secions, West
Handrail Details
Study Model Development
10.07 Final Bunt r# DpIgI Da.msm
10.08 80%Submittal
60% Plan Set
Outline Specs
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review Response to 30%
10.09 W%SubmW.1
90% Plan Set
Draft Space
90 %PSE Debrief (with city)
City Comment Review/ Response to 60%
10.10 100%Submidal
100% Plan Set
Final Specs
City Comment Review Response to 90%
Senior
UD /LA
64.90
Project Designer CAD urve
Sy Office
Sury I LA/Survey I Technician I Crew Admin
56.56 I 40.131 31.25 I 47.661 23.08
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I 1 I I
I i I I
I 1 I I
I I I I
I I 1 I
1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
i I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I 1
I 1 I I
I I I I
1 I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
Multiplier
2.881745
Reimb.
Conineaknount
Y
S
S
S
S
5
S
S
S
S
Y
Y
S
S
S
Y
Y
S
Y
1
S
1
Y
S
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
Subtotal) 0.0 1 0.0
1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
1 0.0 IS
.m�i��wi'�.
I
I
11.0 Urban Design and Way Finding
I
Reimbursable.
11.01 Illumination
1 40.0 1
I 148.0 1 200.0 I
I
42,607.29 J
11.02 Wayfinding Furnishings &Signal
1 16.0 1
1 400 1 64.0 1
1
13,381.67
11.03 Landscaping and Irrigation
1 30.0 1
1 960 1 124.0 1
1
27.879.38
11.04 Walkway Selection/ Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies
24.0 I
I 54.0 1 72.0 1
1
s
17,217.33
Reimbursables
20.0 I
S
500.00
500.00
1 14.0 1
I
Subtotal 110.0 1 0.0
I
1 338.0 1 480.0 1 0.0
I 0.0 1
500.001
101.585.68
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Reimbursable.
I
Subtotal t 0.0 1
1
0.0 I
0.0 I
O.0 I
0.0 1 0.0 1 i
9a:<fl ,.�,..e
,,,w, I. :d.,.t,.- .,.Ira; a:3a n
13.0 SI®ta1 Dea
13.01 WSDOT Coordination
I 6.0 I
20.0 1
20.0 I
20.0 I
I
8.495.961
13.02 Pedestrian Signal Across West Valley Hifhwav Design
1 14.0 1
42.0 1
76.0 1
40.0 1
I s
21,855.15
13.03 Signal Modifications at Andover Park E Baker Blvd.
1 2.0 1
6.0 1
16.0 1
12.0 I
4.282.96
14.0 R YOItof-W.YServices
14.01 Legal Description
14.02 Rightof-Way Plan
14.03 Title Reports
Subtotal I 22.0 1 68.0 1 112.0 1 72.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I
I 1 1,550.72
1 1 32.0 1 20.0 1 9,776.32
8.0 36.0
1 70 1 260 1 12.0 1 26.0 I 10,118.73
Page 4 of 4
73
I I 1 I I
Subtotal: 0.0 I 16.0 1 74.0 1 44.0 1, 46.0 I 0.0 1 2.000.00 1 23.445.77
FEEESMMATE CRyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Center, PadesVlan/Blcycle Bridge
j.&A�iAfoCb I
Palmer M
I Projec I Project I Project
Intern Admin S
Specs QA /QC
Multiplier
Teak SCOPE OF WORK
I
I
I
I ContraatAmount
72.84 I
39 42 I
44.23 I
34.86 I
Reimb. I
v:
O
1.0 Proles Menatemem and P_. 1.1
1.01 Project Schedule 1 2
20 1 8
8.0 1 I I
I 1 1.0 I I
1
1,513.59
1.02 Design Team Supplemental Agreements I I
I I
I I I
I I I I
1.03 Progress Reports 1
1 1
12.0 1 I I
I I 120 I 1
2
2,202.11
1.04 Invoices 1 1
1 1
12.0 I I I
I I 12.0 1 1
2
2,202.11
1.05 Team Meetings (Assume 12 meetings 3 City Workshops) 1 1
18.0 1 1
18.0 1 18.0 1 1
18.0 1 9.0 1 I I
1
11,534.66
Consultant Meetings W/ City (Assume 12 meeting 1 I
I I
I I I
I 1 I 1
Consultant Internal Meetings (Assume 12 meeting I
I 1
1 I
I 1 1
Reimbursables
Subtotal 2
20.0 I 5
50.0 i 18.0 I 1
18.0 I 8.0 I 25.0. I 0.0 I 0.0. 1 1
1 1
17,452.46
2.0 Deei®t Criteria DocumetK
2.01 Design Criteria Draft I I
I 1
1 I I
I I I I
2.02 Design Criteria Final I
I I
I 1 1
1 I I
Reimbursables
I I
Subtotal 0
0.0 1 0
0.0 1 0.0 I 0
I I
Page 1 of4
74
FEEESTIMATE Cltyaf Tukwila
Tukwlla Urban Center, PedestriaryBicycla Bridge
P
Project
Project Prgec[
Partner I
Manager
Designer Architect
I Intern I Admin I Specs I QA /QC
Task SOOPEOF WOW
I
I I I I
72.84 39.42
44.23 34.86
23.56 18.75 39.42 38.42
TiR I
I I I
I I
I I
Site Drainage I
I I I
I
I I
Infiltration I
I I I I
I
I I
807 UUUb. I
I I I I
I I I
City and Private Relocations I
I I I I
I I I
Franchise Utility Coordination 1
I I I I
I I I
Seattle Public Utility Coordination I
I 1 I I
I I I
808 ChannNltabon and Signing
Parking Lot Revisions I
I I I I
I I I
F Roadway Signing I
I I I I
I I I
F Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study I
I I I I
I 1 I
f Rechannelization Baker St I
I I 1 I
I I 1
8.09 Cox EeUmata I
I I I I
I I I
30% I
I I I I
I I I
60% I
I I I I
I I I
90% I
I 1 I
I I I
Final 1
I I I
I I I
8.10 Bpecmaadona I
I I I I
I I I
60% Outline I
I I I I
I I I
90% Special Provisions
Final Special Provisions I
I I I I
I I I
a.11 Planheeta I
I I I I
I I I
30% I
I I I I
I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I
I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I 1 1
I I I
Roadway Sections() sheet) I
I I I
1 I 1
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
QC Review 1
I I I I
I I I
1
'60% I
I I I I
I I I I
i I I
I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I 1 I I
I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I I 1 I
I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I
I 1 I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I 1 I I
I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I I
QC Review I
I I I I
I I I
90% I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) 1
I I I I
I I I
TESC Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I 1
I I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I 1
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I 1
I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
QC Review
I
100 I
I I 1 I
I I 1 I
I I I I
I 1 I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) I
I I I I
1 I I
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Drainage (4 sheets)
Drainage Detail (1 sheet)
Utility (3 sheets)
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I I
QC Review I
I I I I
I I I I
I
Final Bid Set I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets) 1
I I I I
I I I I
TESC Plans (4 sheets) I
1 I I 1
I I I I
TESC Detail (I sheet) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Roadway Sections (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets) 1
I I I
I I I 1
Paving Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I Y
Drainage (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I L
Drainage Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility (3 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I
Utility Detail (1 sheet) I
I 1 I I
I I I I
Channelization and Signing (4 sheets) I
I I I I
I I I 1
Channelization Detail (1 sheet) I
I I I I
I I I Y
QC Review I
I I I
I I I
Reimbursables
Subtotal)
1 I
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1
I I 1
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 i
ol 1111,11z
9.02
Multiplier 't
3 154
Reimb. I ContractAmount
Page 2 of 4
75
FEEESTIMATE CltyofTukwlle
Tukwila Urban Center, Patlestriar(/Blcoe Bridge
Page 3 of 4
76
Project Project Project
I
Multiplier r,
Partner I I Intern I Admin I Specs I QA /QC
Manager Designer
I I
Architect
31b4f
Tack SCOPE OF WORK
I I I I I
I
72,84 39.42 44.23 34.86 23.56 18.75 I 39.42 I 38.42 I
ContractAnloum
Remit.
Deep Foundations
I I I I I I$
West Abutment I
I I I I I I I
East Abutment
I I I I I I I
Arch Steel Pipes
I I I I I I I
Arch Abutment Connections 1
I I I I I I I
Arch Tension Ties I
I I I I I I I
Arch MiscellaneousConnections
I I I I I I I
DeckSuperstructureFraming I
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab I
I I 1 I I I I
Deck Hand Railing I
I I I I I I I
Arch Suspension Hangers
I I I I I I I
9.03 WastApproach Ramp Design
I I I I _...I I I
Shaft Foundations I
I I I I I I I
Concrete Columns I
I I I I I 1
Structural Earth Walls
I I I I I I I
Steel Superstructure
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab
I I I I I I I
Hand Railings
I I I 1 I I I
9.04 EsdApproach Ramp Dealt I
I I I I I I I
Shaft Foundations
I I I I I I I
Concrete Columns I
I I I I I I I
Structural Earth Walls I
I I i I 1 I I
Steel Superstructure 1
I I I I I I I
Deck Slab I
1 I I I I I I
Hand Railings
I I I I I I I
9.05 Miscellanecusstructurea J
I I I I I I I
Wayrinding Sign Supports and Foundations 1
I I I I I I I
Utility Protection Structures 1
I I I I I I 1
MiscellaneousRetainingWalls
I I I I I I I
LightingSupportsandFoundations
I I I I I I I
9.06 Anticipated Structural Plan Sheets (Sheet Count 358) I
I I I I I I
General Notes and Abbreviations I
I I I I I I I
General Plan and Elevation
I I I I I I I
Horizontal Control Plan
I 1 I I I I I
Construction Sequence (2 Sheets)
I I 1 1 I I I
Foundation Layout I
I I I I I I I
Pile Details
I I I I I I I
West Abutment Plan and Elevations
I I I I I I I
WestAbutmentDetails I
I I I I I I I
EastAbutment Plan and Elevations I
I I I I I I I
East Abutment Details
I I I I I I I
Superstructure Layout I
I I I I I I 1
Arch Plan and Elevation
I I I 1 1 I I
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Arch Details (3 Sheets) 1
I I I I I I I
Arch Tension Ties I
I I I I I I I
ArchTensionTieDetails
I I I I I I I
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
I 1 I 1 I I I
Deck Framing Plan
I I 1 I I I I
Deck Sections (2 Sheets) I
I I I I I I I
Deck Details (2 Sheets) I
I I I I 1 I I
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Deck Vert ical Support Layout (2 Sheets) I
I 1 I I I I I
Deck Vertical Support Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Deck Vertical Support Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
West Approach Plan and Elevation I
I I I I I I I
West Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
1 I I I I
West Approach Superstructure Sections
I I I I I I I
3
West Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
I I 1 I I I I
West Approach Deck Sections 1
I I I I I I I
West Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets) I
I I I I I I I
East Approach Plan and Elevation
I I I I 1 I I
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation I
I I I I I I I
EastApproach Superstructure Sections
I 1 I I I I I
East Approach Superstructure Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
East Approach Deck Sections I
I I I I 1 I I
East Approach Deck Details (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
Miscellaneous Structures (2 Sheets)
I I I I I I I
9.07 DelNarables
30%PSESubmRfal I
I I I I I I 1
30% PSE Plan Set
I I I I 1 I I
S
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and Costs
1 I I I I I I
30% PSE QA/QC
I I 1 I I I I
I
I I I I I I
60%PSESubmftfal
I I I I I I I
60% PSE Plan Set
1 I I I I I I
Specification Outline
I I I I I I I
Updated Quantities and Costs
I I I I I I I
Responses to City 30 %PSE Comments I
I I I I I I I
60 PSE QA/QC
1 I I I I I 1
I
I I I I I I I
90%PSESubmftl
I I I I I I I
90% PSE Plan Set
I I I I I I I
Draft Specification I
1 I I I I I I
Updated Quantities and Costs
I I I I I i
Responses to City 60% PSE Comments
1 I I I I I I
90% PSE QA/QC I
I I 1 I I I I
I
I I I I I I I
Final PSE Submittal I
I I I I I I I
Final PSE Plan Set I
I I I I I I I
Final Specification
I I I I I I I
FinalQuantitiesandCosts I
I I I I I I I
Responses to City 90% PSE Comments
I I I I I I I
Final PSE QA/QC I
I I I I I I I
Reimbursables
1
I
Subtotal
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0,0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1
Page 3 of 4
76
FEEESDMATE CityofTukwile
Tukwila Urban Center, Pedestrian/Siuycie Bridge
p *4110001
s Partner
Project
Project I
Project I
Intern I Admin
I Specs I QA/QC
Multiplier
Manager
Designer 1 Architedt
3.154/
Teak SCOPE OF WORK
S 7284 I
39 42 I
44.23 I 34.86 I
23.56 I 1815
I 39.42 I 38.42
Reimb. 1 ConuiletAmu
10.0 Bridge AaatheOd Collaboration(LMN)
10.01 Bridge Structure
I I
I
I
I
1
I 1
Arch Geometry
14.0 I
16.0 1
80.0 I
I
40.0 I
I 1
19,342.35
Arch Color
M 2.0 l
10 1
20
I
2.0 I
I 1
1,011.65
Connections Susp Cables
M 2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 I
I
2.0 I
I I
1,011.65
Connections Bridge Deck
2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 I
1
2.0 1
I I
1,011.65
Connections Abutments
M 2.0 1
1.0 1
2.0 1
1
20 I
1 I,
1,011.65
Connections Tied Arch
2.0 I
1.0 1
2.0 1
I
20 1
I 1
1011.65
Connections Lateral Support
M 2.0 I
1.0 I
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1011.65
10.02 Approach Ramps
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
Column Treatments
2.0 I
1.0 I
2.0 1
1
2.0 I
I I
1,011.65
Superstructure Treatments
2.0 I
1.0 1
2.0 1
1
2.0 I
I I
1011.65
Deck Treatments
M 2.0 1
1.0 1
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1,011.65
Earthwall Treatments
2.0 1
1.0 1
20 1
1
2.0 1
1 I
1011.65
Handrail System
l 2.0 I
2.0 I
2.0 1
I
2.0 I
1 I
1,136.01
10.03 Draft Beek of Design Document
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
10.04 30%Plan Set
y i
10.0 i
60 I
I
16.0 1
I 1 10.0
4482.01
10.05 30% PSE Debrief (with city)
M 2.0 I
4.0 I
4.0 1
I
I
I I
1,515.14
10.06 Iinonli CWral Sheets /Design
M I
I
I
I
I
I
Code Sheet
M 1
6.0 1
I
10.0 I
6.0 1
I 1
2,291.83
Elevations
1
10.0 1
10.0 1
16.0 I
6.0 I
1 I
4.844.42
Sections (2 sheets)
I
10.0 1
16.0 1
26.0
10.0 1
i I
7,078,64
Connection Details (2 sheets)
l 1
10.0 1
16.0 I
26.0 1
10.0 I
1 1
7,078.64
Lighting Coordination
M 1
6.0 I
6.0 1
10.0 1
6.0 1
1 I
3,12902
Approach Sections, East
I
80 I
8.0 1
20.0 1
100 1
1 1
5,053.83
Approach Secitons, West
M I
8.0 1
8.0 1
20.0 1
10.0 1
I I
5,053.83
Handrail Details
4
B.0 1
10.0 1
200 1
10.0 1
1 1
5,332.89
Study Model Development
l I
1
10.0 I
20.0 1
40.0
1 I
6,56737
10.07 Final Beals of Desigi Document
N I
I
I
1
I
1 I
10.08 50%Submtol
M I
I
I
I
I
I I
60% Plan Set
N 16.0 1
10 -0 1
I
SOA I
20.0 I
I I 16.0
9,445.68
Outline Specs
M I
10.0 I
4.0 1
10.0 I
I
1 26.0 I 8.0
7,104.38
60 %PSE Debrief (with city)
1 2.0 1
4.0 I
4.0 1
4.0 i
1
1
1,955.03
City Comment Review /Response to 30%
1 4.0 1
20.0 1
4.0 1
1
10.0 1
I I
4,707.70
10.09 90%subml0al
1 I
I
I
I
t
1 1
90% Plan Set
h 100 1
50.0 I
26.0 I
80.0 I
50.0 I
I 1 10.0
25,869.74
Draft Specs
1
10.0 1
4.0
20.0 1
I
1 26.0 1 8.0
8,204.11
90 %PSE Debrief (with city)
l 2.0 I
4.0 I
I
4.0 1
I
I 1
1,39690
City Comment Review Response to 60%
M 2.0 1
10.0 1
10.0 1
16.0 1
1 8.0
1 I
5,331.25
10.10 100%SubmMal
y i
I
I
I
I
I I
100% Plan Set
8.0 I
16.0 1
16.0 1
24.0 1
24.0 1
1
10,483.70
Final Specs
l I
4.0 1
I
8.0 1
1
1 16.0
3.366.95
City Comment Review /Response to 90%
2.0 1
oe:_......_ue.:
8.0 1
8.0 1
16.0 1
1 4.0
1
2500.00 1
4,566.87
2,500.00
Subtotal 84.0 254.0 1 272.0 1 350.0 1 290.0 1 12.0 1 69.0 1 52.0 1 S 2,500.00 1 167,955.13
x d u..:.. .t,...' .s.
gki' .t....... .....M y;...t.t
X 11.0 Urban Design and way Finding
11.01 Illumination M I I 1 I I I I S
11.02 Wayfintling, Furnishings Signal l I 1 i I 1 1 1
11.03 Landscaping and Irrigation I I I I I I I I
11.04 Walkway Select ion /Parking Lot Trail Alignment Studies 1 1 I I I I I
Subtotal 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 00 1 0.0 I 0.0 1 S I$
.....0 l :.a„� k iIo ke
12.0 Typea. Size, and Location Report (Complete)
1 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I 1
Reimbursables 1
Subtotall 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is 1$
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0
Page 4 of 4
77
FEEESRMATE CRY fTUkMla
Tukwila Urban Carde, Pedeatrlan/81eyole 8ndge
o
w Sen or Senior Somor Staff CAD /GIS Project Support M It pI er_
Principal Assude,a Senior I I Project I SCAO
Assoc ate project Staff
Tech C oord. Staff 3258]
Teak I SCOPE OFVgRK
I I I I I I I I I
ComraetAmouft
I I
65.00 56.00 47 00 40.00 36 DD 32.00 30.00 25.00 31.00
24.00 29.00 1].00 Re orb
➢:ac4i5iY
1.0 Prided Manaaamar& and AdminW"Wn
h!:_ x =x �vwx,: ,.,..:xs. ....axx
101 Prol1 S ch edule
1oz Design Team supplemental Aareemenss I
I I I I I I
I I
103 Progress Reports I
I I I I I I I
I
1.04 1--s
1.05 Team Meetrngs(Assume 12 meetings& 3 City Workshops) I
I I I I I I I
I 1
ConsultantMeen ngs w/ city (A,,,,, 12 meeung) I
I I I I I I I
I
Consu) fort[ l oternaI Meebngs(A -a 12 meeting) I
I I I I I I
I 1
Reimbursables
I
I
Subtotal:
.x:. �•=aa4�
I I
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I�
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1$
20 Deel CMerh D-hr errt
201 Design Criteria Draft I
I I I I I I I
I I
202 Design Cntena Final I
I I I I I I I I
1
Reimbursables
Subtotal
I 1
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I.$
4., ere
1 3.0_ i a!hlo and BoundaNS -WJaG KPFF CMR
301 Topographic Mepp!,'Phasel I
I I I I I I I I I
I
302 Topographic Ma pp mg Phasel I
I I 1 I I I I I I
I
303 5...yBaseReview I
I I I I I
I
Reimbursables
al
I
I 1
Subtotal
0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 I'
0.0 1 0.0 I 0.0 I
.M ,n:i !o-r',@;___ avav- cr3!a+i�.xrnh:ri'�.rriw.3'i
�:atrsz.� �a3:!:i'!1ua$.'sne�n!!ivi iiigk3.x m'urenxihi
x um�nw Yi ixa�+ dtau!ieid
4.0 Qeotechnlal Reaereh and Reed andetiom
401 Field Explorations and Laboratory Testing I
I I I I 40 I I 440 I I
I 20 1
424283
402 Seotechnical Evaluation. Repomng. and Meetings 1
80 I I I I 64.0 I 1 1 1
20 1 60 1 40
10,14759
403 Rewewof Reportand Comments I
I I 1 I I I I I
I I
Reimbursables
14.156.00
Subtat& 1
I I I I
&0 I 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 88.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 44.0 1 0.0
20 1 8.0 1 4.0 1 14;058.00
28.546.42
5.0 Kydreulim(KPFF CMn
501 Meet with Agencies I
I I I I I I I I
I I
502 Establish 100-year Floodplain I
I I I I I I I I
I
503 Establish Structure) Clearance I
I I 1 I I I I
Reimbursable.--
I
Subtotal)
I
0.0 1. 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1
0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 f
6.0 Ena er!ta1 end PermhBng Services (Landau KPFF CMn
6.01 seam. Agency, antl PreApplication Meetings I
I I 60 140.0 I I I I I
I E
19,167.6]
6 SEPA Checklist I
02
I I 20 I 110 I I I 80 1 I
I 40 I 10
295564
603 AST LOCaI Programs ECS 1
I 1 30 140 1 1 80 I I I
I 50 I 10
3594.35
6.04 Phase EnvironmentalSne Assessment I
I 10.0 I I I I 54.0 I 40
15.0 I ]0 8
8,433.52
605 Biological Assessor oVEFH I
1 I 60 400 I I 36.0 1 I
50 12.0 1 1.0
11,467.37
606 Cultural Resources Investigation I
1 1 80 1 I I I
4.0 1
1.420.79
6.07 Shoreline Permit 1
1 I 3.0 360 1 1 I 4.0 I
16.0 I 40
7,289.71
6.08 Wetland/W..rway Delineation 1
I I 20 1 260 I I 34.0 I I I 10.0
10.0 I 1.0
9.251.45
6.09 Critical Areas Report I
I 1 60 1 300 I I 26.0 I I I 24.0
I 10.0 I 1.0
10.96553
6.10 M itigation Construction Documents 1
40 I 1 360 1 290 I I I I 36.0
3.0 I
14,061.29
6.11 JARPA I
I
I I 1.0 80 I I 8.0 I I I
I 3.0 I SO
2.36907
612 Aquatic Lands Easement I
I I 20 80 I I I I
I 20 I 10
1.59350
Reimbursables
11.476001
11.47600
Subtabll
4.0 1 10.0 1 67.0 1 580.0 1 0.0 1 700.0 I 16.0 1 54.0 I 78.0 I
5.0 1 84.0 1 18.0 11478.00
104 045 89 1
w.Y .::..:ra t:': ss... �..'9x°� .i!
7.0 ProlectWarWhop:_......_..
7.01 oternal Team PSE Kickoff Meeting I
I I I I I I I I
I I
7.02 TSL Review& Project Kickoff Meeting I
I I I I I I I I
I I
7.03 Tied Arch Gonceptwprkehop I
I I I I I I I I
I I
Tied Arch Altematives Graphics I
I I I I I I I
I I
7.04 West and East Approach Concept Workshop I
I I I I 1 I I I
I I
West Approach I
I I I I I I
I
East Apo roacn I
I I I I 1 I I I
I I
705 Final Concept Selection Workshop I
I I 1 1 1 I I 1
1 I
Connection Detail sketches I
I 1 I I I I
I I
Surface Fh Examples I
I I I I I I
I I
Color Examples I
1 I I I 1 I
I I
Study Model Development I
I I I I I I
I I
sketch Up Qualiry Penderings(6) I
1 I I I I 1 I
I I
706 Publido"sach I
I I I I I I
Graphics I
I I I I I I I I
I I
I
Reimbursables
I
8.0 ON Engin q
8.01 aad Con-W~cp wd Preferred AR Seleedw
8.02 Bib Prep and D.molma
8.03 Kod[atei and VOMC.1 layout
Route Layout
Horizonte' Control
Ramptransitions
Vertical Alignment
Vehicular Crossing of Trail
Rechannelintion Baker St
Riverview Plaza Dnveway Reconst,,,b,n
804 0redirM and Paving Model
otlel
Typical Section
Coord wO KGFD no USAGE
805 fmC
806 Surfaee VMWr
Ti
Site Dram.ge
Inflltrat-
807 tMlities
City antl Private Relocations
Franchise Utility Coordination
Seattle Publ is Utility Coord -mr,
808 Channellaetlonand Sl9ning
Parking Lot Revisions
Roadway Signing
Riverview Plaza Parking Lot Circulation Study
Rechan al-ton Baker St
1 0.0 1 0.0 4 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1. 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 is
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
8
8
1
Page 1 of 4 p
7 U
FEEEBTIMATE CilyoTTUkwlla
Tukwila Ultme Center, Pedes0lah/Blcycle Bridge
Page 2 of 4
79
Send,
Senior ff Senior
D Pro ect Su rt
CA OIS
M It 1
p
f
Pnncipall
Assoc ate
IASSOC atel Senior
I Prolect I
",a, I S[af/ I I CAD I
Tech I Coortl. I Staff
3258]
Tack SODPEOFMRR
1
1
1
1 I
1 1
I
I C�An
6500 5600
$4700 40001
3600
$32,00 30.001 2500 3100
24.00 29001 17.001
Re mb
Otw
8.09 Co Eegmaee
I I
I
I I
I I I
I
I
30
I
I
I I
I I I
I I
60
I
I I
I I I
I I
8
90%
I
I
I I
I I
I j
Final
810 Bpecir"done
6o%outline
I I
I I I
I I 1
I I
90%speaal Provisions
I I
I I I
I I I
I
Final Special Provisions
I I
I I I
I
I I I
I I
8.11 Pmneheata
30
I
I I I
I
I I 1
I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
TESL Plans (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I I
I I
Roadwaysections(Isheep
Plan /Profile Sneets (3 sheets)
sheets)
Dri
utniry(3seets)
h
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
ChannelaadpnandSignmg(3aheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
QC Review
I j I
I I
I
I I 1
I
I I
I
I
j I I I
I
•60%
I
I
I
I I I I
I I
1
Site Prep ambon(a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
TESC Plans (a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I j
TESC D-1 (I sheet)
RoadwayS ens(lsheep
I I I
I I
1
I I I I
I I
s
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I I I
I I
I I I
I I
PaviegDetail(isheet)
I I I
I I
I 1 I
I I
Dramage (4 she
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Drainage Ca l(I sheep
I I I
I I
I
I I�I
I
Utlity(3 sheets)
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
JebtyD I(I sheet)
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I
ChannelizationaneSigning(4 sheets)
CnannelaabonDetall(isheep
QCRevlew
I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
1
sax
1 I I
I I
1
I I I I
I I
Site Preparation (4 sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
TESL Plans (4 sha
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
TESC Detail (I sheep
I I I
I I
1
I I
I
Roadway Sections (I S heap
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
Plan/Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
P_ngDetad(Isheet)
Drainage(3sheets)
DrainageDetau(Isheet)
utility(3sheets)
I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Ublity Detail (I sheep
I
1
I
I I I
I
Channelaanon and Signing is sheets)
channelization Denali (Isheet)
I I I
I 1
I
I I
I
QC Review
1 I I
I I
I
II
I
1
10s%
I I I
I I
I
I I
j
I I
(a sneers)
I I I
I I
I
I
I
I I
T Plans (4 s
T E S C Plans (a sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I I
TESC Detail (S sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I
I I
Roadway sec[ipns(I sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Paving Datel(I sheet)
I I
I
I
I I I I
I
Drainage (4 sheets)
I
I
I
I I I I
f I
Drainage De tall (i sheet)
I
I
I
I I 1 I
I
urlity(ssheets)
I I I
I
I
I I I
I
Utility Derail (1 sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I�I
I
Channehzahon and Signmg(4 sheets)
I I I
I I
I I I
channerzation D Sheet)
I I I
I I
1 1 I
I I
I I
QC Review
I
FinalRidSet
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
SO Prepambon (4 sheets)
TESCPIans(4sheets)
TESC D-1 (I sheep
I I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Roatlway Sections(I sheep
I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
Plan /Profile Sheets (3 sheets)
I
1
I
I I I I
I I
Paving Detail (I sheep
I I
I j
I
I I I
I
D (4 sheets)
I I I
I 1
I
I I�I
I
Dremage Dated 11 sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I
I ihty(3 sheets)
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Udi'l Detan(I sheep
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I
Channelization and Sig mng(a sheets)
I I I
I I
1
I I I I
I
Channelned- Detel(l sheet)
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I I
QCRevlew
I I I
I I
I
I I
I
I
Reimbursables
I
SutdaW l 0.0 I 0.0 I
0.0 I 0.0 I
as-
0.0 I
0.0 I 0.0 1 0.0 I '0.0
ataa..u�:::�ss
0.0 I 0.0 I. 0.0 1$
sa:ws�x ��zasx::xe s- `�v -mv e
9.0 SthhIurel Em dnaeHln MPFF)
.s�
iTi.'+
siuin•
.$""1�
901 BeWotDaign
I I
I
I
I I I
I I
902 Bridgl
I I
I
I
I I I
I I
Deep Foundabons
I I
I
I
I I I I
I I
West Abutment
I I I
1
I
I I I I
I I
East Abutment
I I I
I I
I
I I I
j I
ArchSte
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
Arch Abutment Connections
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
ArchTe M-T,es
I I
I I
I
I I 1
I I
Arch Misceuaneousconnections
1 I I
I I
I
I I I
1 I
DeckS p— tuctere Framing
Deck Slab
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I
Deck Hand Ra i ng
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
ArchSUSpensionHangars
I I I
I I
I
I I 1 I
I
903 Wsst Approach Ramp Design
Shaft Foundations
I 1 I
I I
I
I I I
1
Concretecommns
I
I I
I
I 1 I
I
8
Structural Earth Walls
Steel Superstructure
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
Deckslab
Hand Railings
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I
904 East Approach Ramp Design
I I I
I I
I
I I I I
I I
Shaff Foundations
1 I I
I I
I I I I
I I
Concratecowmns
I I I
I I
I_I I
I I
Structural Earth Walls
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Steelsuperstructure
I I I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Deckshi,
1 I
I I
I
I I I
I I
Page 2 of 4
79
FEEMIMTE Ceyof Tukwila
Tukwila Urban Career, Padestnan/Bicycle Bridge
Prolec[ I Staffr I Staff I S11 I C Tech S l Coo I SSteffrt 3 258
17
32 00 I 30.00 I 25.00 I 3100 I 24 00 I 2900
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I i I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I_I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
OFEM®
CamractAmount
a
Subtptell 00 1 00 1
Principal I sell IASSOC ate Senior I ben or
m� lllE ii.w ,1„
Assoc ate Protect
Task SCOPE OF WORK
I I I I
10.01 Bfld gestrucWro I I I
65 00 56.00 47 00 40 00 36.00
Hand Railings
1 I I I
905 Mbcelleneow Structures
I I I I
Wayfinding Sign Supports and Foundations
I 1 I I
utility Protection Struetures
1 I I I I
Miscellaneous Retaining Walls
I I I I
Lighting Supports and Foundations
I I I I
906 Anticipated Structural Plan Sheeb(Shest Count: 358)
I I I I
General Notes and Abbreviations
I I I I
General Plan and Elevation
I I I
Horizontal convol Plan
I I I
construction sepuence (2sneets)
I I I
Foundaton Layout
I I I
Pile Details
I I I I
West Abutment Plan and Elevaaons
I I I
West Abutment Details
I I I I I
East Abutment Plan and Elevations
I I 1 I 1
Eaat Abutment Details
I I I I
Superstructure Layout
I I I
Arch Plan and Elevation
1 I I 1
Arch Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I
Arch Details (3 Sheets)
1 I I I I
Aren Tension Ties
I I I I I
Arch Tension Tle Details
I I I I
Deck Framing Plan and Elevation (2 Sheets)
I
I I I I I
Deck Framing Plan
I I I I
Deck Sections (2 Sheets)
I I I I
Deck Details(2 sheets)
I I I I
Arch Connection Details (3 Sheets)
I I I I
Deck V.—I Support Layout(2 Sheets)
I I I
Deck Vertical Support Sections(2 Sheets)
I I I
Deck Vertical Support Detail.(2 Sheets)
I I
West Approach Plan and Elevatlon
I I I I
West Approach Foundation Plan antl Elevation
I I I I
West Approach Superstructure Sections
I I
West Approach Superstructure Details(2 Sheets)
I I 1
West Approach Deck Seen—
I 1 1 1
West Approach Deck Details(2Sheets)
I 1 I I
Easl Approach Plan and Bev.-
1 1 I I
East Approach Foundation Plan and Elevation
1 I I 1
East Approach Superstructure Sections
I I I I I
Eas[Approach Superstructure Detail.(2 Sheets)
1 I I I I
East Approach Deck Sections
1 I I I I
East Approach Deck Details(2 Sheets)
1 I I I I
Miscellaneous Structures(2Sheets)
1 I I 1 I
9.07 DelNetablsa
I I I I I
30% psE Submittal
I I I I I
30% PSE Plan Set
1 I I 1 I
Preliminary Estimated Quantities and C—
I I I I I
30% PSE QA/QC
I I I I I
I I
6096 PSE Submlttel
I I I I
I I I I I
60% PSE Plan Set
I I I I I
Specification 0unine
I I I
updated Quantmes and costs
I I I I I
Responses to City 30 %PSE Comments
I I I I I
60% PSE QA/QC
I I I I I
9D% PSE Submittal
I I I I I
I I I I I
90 %PSE Plan Set
I 1 I I
Draft Speclapahon
I I I
updated Quantities and Coata
I I I
Responses to city 60 %PSE Comments
I I
90%PSE QA/QC
I I I
Final PSESubmltral
I I
I I I
Final PSE Plan Set
I I I
Flnalspeabcauon
I I
Final Quantities antl Costs
I I I
Responses %PSE Comments
I I I
Final PSE QA/QC
I I I
Prolec[ I Staffr I Staff I S11 I C Tech S l Coo I SSteffrt 3 258
17
32 00 I 30.00 I 25.00 I 3100 I 24 00 I 2900
I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I i I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I_I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I 1 I I
I I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I I I
OFEM®
CamractAmount
a
Subtptell 00 1 00 1
0,0 1 00 1 00 I o0 1 0o I oo I o0 I o0 1 00 1 00 1$ I$
m� lllE ii.w ,1„
]A.O Bridge AaeMstice Coll boratlpn (LAIN)
10.01 Bfld gestrucWro I I I
I I I I I I 1
Arch Geometry I I I
I I I I I I
Arch Color I I I
I I I I I I 8
Connecton, S,sp Cables 1 I I
I I I I I I I 8
Connections Bridge Deck
Connections Abutments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Connections -Tied arch I I I
I I I I I I I I 1
Connections Lateral Support I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1002 iuVri Ramps I I I
I I I I I I I I
Column Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Superstructure Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I I
Deck Treatments I I I
I I I I I I I I
Earthwall Treatmenrs I I I
I I I I I
I I
Handrail System I I I
I I I I I I I
I I
1003 Drar
tBbofDasig,13 —rhere I I
I I I I I
I I
10.04 30%Plan Sa I I I
I I I I I_I I I I
10.05 30% PSE Debi(with dm I I I
I I I I I I I I I
1006 Archleefural Shisete /Design I I 1
I I I I I I I I
Code Sheet I 1 1
I I I I I 1 I I I
Eleven- I I I
I I I I I I I I I l
Secdona(2 sheets) I I
I I I I I I I I I
Connect on Details (2 sheers) I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I
Lighting COOrtlina4on I I
I I I I 1 I I I I
Approach Sections. East I I
I I I I I 1 I I I
Approach Secitons, West I I
I I I 1 1 I I I
Handrail Details I I
I I I I 1 1 I I I
Stud' Model Development I I I
I I I I I I
I I
1007 Final Sed fr Design Docunrere I
I I I I I I
I I
1008 60%Subtngtal I I
I I I I
I I
60%plan Sef I I
I I I I I I I
outlme specs I I
I I I I I I I I
6096 PSE Debrief (with city) I I
I I I I I I I
city Comment Review /Response to 30% I I
I I I I I I I I
1009 DD%Submgbl I I
I I I I I I I
9096 Plan Set
Draft Specs
90% PSE Debrief(with city) 1 I I
I I I I 1 I I
Page 3 of 4
80
FEEESTIMATE' CilyefTukwila
Tukwila Urban Carder. Padeatriar /Blgcle Brklga
I Senor I
I I Senor I I Senor I 3W1 I Senior IUD /GIST Pal. I So.- 1
10 Itle 4
Tank I
Assoc ate P
Project staff C
32581 -µt
Cary Comment Review /Response to 60% I I I I
I I I I I 1 I
1010 10096 Sub m Mbl 1 I I I
I i I I I I I 1
Soo %Plan Set I I I I
I I I i I I I
fmalsoecs 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I I
CnvGommentReyiew /R,,Ponse to 90% I I
Reimbursables I
I M
MEW
Subbalall 0.0 I 0.0 I 0
0.0 I 0.0 'I 0
0.0 I 0.0 1
1 0.0 1 OA I 0:0
$W_ s"aam," .:°u-. ':t
Page 4 of 4
81
82
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Transit Center
Project No. 90610402, Contract 06 -019
Supplemental Agreement No. 13
ISSUE
Supplement to the IBI Group on the combined Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center and
Andover Park W design contract in the amount of $429,000.00.
BACKGROUND
In February 2006, IBI Group was retained by the City to begin the design of the Tukwila Urban
Center Transit Center on Andover Park W. The Transit Center's Concept Plan was completed in
December 2006. Due to the overlapping design needs of Transit Center and the Andover Park
W widening project (98810404), the two projects were combined under the IBI Group contract.
The design of the Tukwila Transit Center is at 30% and is coordinated with the design work on
Andover Park W.
DISCUSSION
With the Regional Mobility grant award earlier in 2011, completion of the design and ultimately
construction of the Transit Center is estimated to be fully funded. This supplemental agreement
is to complete the design work through the final design and PS &E documents. Another
supplemental agreement (No. 14) to complete the design effort on Andover Park W, including
design of the water main replacement, is being presented to the Transportation Committee at
the same time. The supplemental agreements are presented separately to aid in the ease of
billing and tracking expenditures by project
Fiscal Impact: A new CIP page is attached to represent the additional funds needed for design,
with the right -of -way costs reduced (page 16, Proposed 2012 CIP).
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Supplement No. 13 to Contract No. 06 -019 with the IBI Group in the amount of
$429,000.00 and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and
subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachments: New Page 16, Proposed 2012 CIP
Supplemental Agreement #13
W:\PWEngkPROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center\INFO MEMO Supp #13 IBI Transit Center Design 11- 18- 11.docx
83
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2012 to 2017
PROJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project No. 90610402
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct a Transit Center for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC)
FUND SOURCES
Awarded TOD Grant
High transit ridership and bus operations warrant conversion of the existing bus stops on Andover Park West
40 428
468
to a Transit Center. The current facilities are inadequate in size and location to serve Metro operations and
JUSTIFICATION:
transit riders. City policy encourages the use of transit, and mitigation dollars and parking supply decisions
Mitigation Actual
500
have been made based upon the expected improvements to the transit center.
500
STATUS:
Design began in 2006. Construction schedule is linked to milestones identified in the State Mobility grant.
MAINT. IMPACT:
Minimal to moderate, depends on final maintenance agreement with King County Metro.
(229)
0 1,376 329 0 0 0
TOD grant of $468k with mitigation from Westfield SIC Mall of $500k for parking variance. WSDOT Regional
TOTAL SOURCES
COMMENT:
Mobility Grant of $4.7m with $3.9m in 2011 -2013 and $835k in 2013 -2015 with a required match of 20% that
0 0 7,522
can include past expenditures, other grants, and ROW value of land dedicated by Westfield.
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
271 40 738
1,049
Land (R/W)
343 916
1,259
Const. Mgmt.
250 300
550
Construction
2,300 2,364
4,664
TOTAL EXPENSES
614 40 4,204 2,664 0 0 0 0 0
7,522
FUND SOURCES
Awarded TOD Grant
40 428
468
Awarded Mob Grant
2,400 2,335
4,735
Mitigation Actual
500
500
ROW Donation
343
343
City Oper. Revenue
(229)
0 1,376 329 0 0 0
0 0 1,476
TOTAL SOURCES
614
40 4,204 2,664 0 0 0
0 0 7,522
Project Location
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program
16
GIs
84
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 13
TO
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 06 -019
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila,
Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and IBI Group, hereinafter referred to as "the
Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on,
February 23. 2006 and identified as Agreement No. 06 -019. All provisions in the basic
agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include work described in Attachment A for
additional design work on the Tukwila Transit Center Project.
2. Payment, shall be amended as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit "C" attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant
shall not exceed $429,000 without express written modification of the Agreement signed
by the City. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented
inclusive of all fees and other costs is now $1,221,815.
3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows:
The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant
to this Agreement by December 31, 2012, unless an extension of such time is granted in
writing by the City.
DATED this day of 20
CITY OF TUKWILA
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
CONSULTANT
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
85
va
City of I ukw'ila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
Sk"'01 C)IF VVORK
NOVEMBER 11 2011
IBI
GROUP
m
m/onuup
SCOPE oFWORK
T W E A E OF CONTENITS
PHASE 3: FINAL DESIGN ADDITIONAL SERVICES 1
Task 3: ROW 1
PHASE ^k CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS S
Task 5: Project Mana0emant.......' 5
Task 6: Stakeholder Coordination 7
Task 7: Design Documents (6096 aod 100JL~_—..~ 0
Task Cosi Estinutes and iD0*
...-._.—�--j1
Task 9: Assistance with BVi|UinB Pumit 11
PHASE S: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OpTUONAL) i2
Task 10: EW Support ~~.....~......~..~.........~.........12
Twk 10 C0Mstmction Supoort 12
SCHEDULE AND FEE 13
November I 1th, 2011
Page
87
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
PHASE 3: FINAL DESIGN ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following additional task has been added to support the Phase 3, Task 3 Right of Way
Acquisition work.
Task 3: KJA ;quis_
The objective of this task is to assist the City in ROW acquisition. Work to be performed includes
preparation of legal documents detailing the ROW acquisition necessary along Andover Park West
to accommodate the new Transit Center, assist with purchase offers, and negotiate final
agreements. The general approach will be as follows:
Obtain a Right of Entry for no compensation. The area would be from the right of way
line to the front of the Firestone building. The purpose would be to obtain information
needed to finalize the plan for demolition and remediation of the site after demolition is
complete. A request for right to do environmental tests to determine if there are any
hazardous materials on site should also be included. Activities for this effort would include
detailed topographical survey work, soil testing for hazardous materials and the right to
have project personnel enter the property to complete the survey and soil testing. This
should be completed as soon as possible.
Obtain a Temporary Construction Easement (TCE). Compensation to be determined
during an appraisal of the property. The area would be from the existing right of way line to
the front of the Firestone building as wide as is needed to allow project personnel and
equipment access to demolish the existing canopy, as well as to remediate any damage
done to the property during demolition. Remediation should include input from the property
owners regarding their wishes for what the site would look like after the canopy is removed
and would likely include work such as paving, parking striping, landscaping, irrigation, and
lighting. This TCE should show on the right of way plans.
Obtain a Permanent Easement. This type of restrictive easement will likely cost the same
as a fee simple acquisition if the City were paying for the entire easement.
CERTIFIED Land Services (CLS) will also sub contract with an appraisal firm to perform the initial
appraisals needed. CLS recommends obtaining at least two bids from qualified WSDOT- approved
appraisers that will include costs and delivery schedule. CLS will make a recommendation for the
hiring of the appraiser that the City can review and make a final decision on.
Assumptions
This work will be performed by Certified Land Services, as sub consultant to IBI
Group.
All forms and conveyance documents will be based on WSDOT templates.
CLS will hire and manage a WSDOT- approved Appraiser for both the Southbound stop
permanent easement and the Northbound stop right of way assessments. Note that in the
Phase 3 scope it was assumed that the City would hire a WSDOT- approved Appraiser.
This has been added to Phase 4 scope to move forward with the acquisitions /easements
November 11th, 2011
IBI
GROUP
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
with the Phase 3 WSDOT- approved appraiser assumed to be hired by the City representing
appraisal of the completed project.
There are no relocations for this project.
Sign relocations will be considered cost to cure items addressed in appraisals and
negotiations.
All utilities easements, permits and clearing will be handled by the City.
Transactions will be closed in escrow. Agents will prepare escrow agreements for each
parcel to clear all encumbrances and parties in interest from each parcel.
Commercial parcels typically have multiple parties in interest. All parties in interest will be
addressed in clearing title.
The City will record all documents and will pay property owners and /or lien
holders /encumbrances for any property or property rights acquired for this project.
CERTIFED will provide certification prep and review.
Acquisition documents for one parcel will be prepared.
The acquisition of the parcel assumes that parking will not be impacted. Additional fees will
be negotiated for the preparation of a Parking Impact Study.
The City of Tukwila will provide title reports for parcels if additional reports are necessary.
The task does not include resolving boundary issues should the title reports have conflicting
information.
Work Activities
3.3. Permanent Easement Firestone
The project involves one parcel which is known as the Firestone property (KC Tax ID NO. 92 -247-
0070) which is a commercially zoned property. We anticipate the acquisition of a right of entry for
design and environmental assessment of the parcel. Upon completion of final design and right of
way plans, the project may require the acquisition of a strip of land in fee simple and improvements
located in that strip of land.
State and /or federal funds are involved in this project requiring strict adherence to Federal
Highways Administration policies and procedures as well as all applicable federal, state and local
laws including, but not limited to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970 and its amendments, 49CFR Part 24, and state Revised Statutes. Work will be
in accordance with the WSDOT Local Agencies Guidelines and by reference the WSDOT Right of
Way Manual.
3.3.1. CERTIFIED staff will review all documents, files, maps, legal descriptions and other
information provided. Errors, questions and clarifications will be reviewed and
discussed.
3.3.2. Appraisal
Assumptions
It is assumed that the Rights of Entry will be obtained for no compensation.
November 11th, 2011
Page 2.
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
In accordance with funding source requirements and the Agency's approved
right of way procedures, CERTIFIED will advise if the acquisition may be
acquired with appraisal waiver or if a full narrative appraisal is required.
Appraisal tasks include the following:
3.3.2.1. CERTIFIED will prepare a preliminary funding estimate (PFE) for the one (1)
fee take parcel describing the parcel, its ownership, the estimated cost of
acquisition, labor, escrow, condemnation, and summary of total right of way
project costs.
3.3.2.2. An Administrative Offer Summary (appraisal waiver) will be written if the
acquisition is valued under $25,000 in the PFE.
3.3.2.3. CERTIFIED will hire and manage the appraiser.
3.3.3. Appraisal Review
Assumptions
Appraisal Reviews are not necessary for acquisitions valued under $25,000
according to state and federal funding source requirements, and the Agency's
approved right of way procedures.
If required, the City will hire a WSDOT- approved appraisal reviewer who will
provide appraisal review services.
Appraisal Review tasks include the following:
3.3.3.1. CERTIFIED will manage the appraisal reviewer hired by the City, and the City
will set just compensation from which the offer will be made.
3.3.4. Administrative
Assumptions
The City will provide a preliminary title commitment for each parcel with
Schedule B showing exceptions listed; copies of vesting deeds and supporting
documents for all liens and encumbrances of record will be included.
PACE will provide all legal descriptions.
PACE will provide an exhibit map for the fee acquisition the rights of entry on the
project.
CERTIFIED staff will maintain all records, files, documents, and reports in
accordance with statutory and WSDOT guidelines and regulations.
Administrative tasks include the following:
3.3.4.1. CERTIFIED will provide signature ready legal documents that will be used to
convey fee or temporary construction easement rights for all parcels.
3.3.4.2. CERTIFIED will provide written status reports on a weekly basis, or as agreed
upon, and will provide verbal status reports on demand, as requested.
3.3.5. Negotiation
Assumptions
CERTIFIED agents will act in good faith at all times.
November 11th, 2011
Page 3.
.8
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
CERTIFIED staff will never coerce owners in an attempt to settle parcels.
CERTIFIED will provide the City with an Administrative Settlement letter for all
requested administrative settlements.
CERTIFIED staff will work whatever hours are necessary, including evenings
and weekends, to make themselves available to owners and their
representatives.
Negotiation tasks will include the following:
3.3.5.1. CERTIFIED will prepare an offer letter for the parcel.
3.3.5.2. CERTIFIED agents will make at least three (3) personal contacts with the
owner with the intent of reaching settlement for the conveyance of property
needed. As many contacts as needed to reach settlement will be made, until it
is mutually agreed between the City and CERTIFIED that negotiations should
be suspended or given to the City Attorney to pursue eminent domain actions.
3.3.5.3. CERTIFIED staff will explain the City's offer verbally and in writing.
3.3.5.4. CERTIFIED staff will provided detailed written diaries for each parcel.
3.3.5.5. CERTIFIED staff will transmit organized parcel files containing all pertinent
information, documents, forms, diaries, and Disclaimer Statements.
3.3.5.6. CERTIFIED staff will prepare a condemnation summary memo if the City
deems it is necessary to acquire the property through the exercising of its
power of eminent domain.
3.3.6. Closing and Conveyance
Closing and Conveyance tasks include the following:
3.3.6.1. CERTIFIED staff will review title for each parcel.
3.3.6.2. CERTIFIED will clear all encumbrances on title that are in conflict with the
acquisition areas of the partial taking parcel.
3.3.6.3. CERTIFIED will prepare any documents needed for clearing any liens or
encumbrances as noted above.
3.3.6.4. CERTIFIED will provide the City with complete files at the close of negotiations
for each parcel. Included in our transmittal packages will be conveyance
documents ready for the City to record and all documents related to lien and
encumbrance removal.
Deliverables
Updated Right of Way Acquisition Table
Legal documents for property acquisition
Weekly status reports
Detailed written diary for the parcel
Documents required to clear any liens or encumbrances
A complete record including all files will be provided at the close of negotiations
November 11 th, 2011
Page 4.
91
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
PHASE 4: CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
The Transit Network Plan for the Tukwila Urban Center (TUC) Subarea' includes as one of its
key recommendations the construction of a new transit center in the immediate vicinity of the
existing focal point of bus service on Andover Park West and Baker Avenue. A new transit
center in this location is expected to act not only as a replacement for the existing bus
stop(s); it will also serve the new King County Metro RapidRide F Line that will begin service
in 2013. In addition, the new transit center is an important step in the redevelopment of the
area, building from current initiatives to redevelop the Southcenter Mall and future plans to
redevelop the Tukwila Urban Center.
The objective of this Phase of the project is to develop a construction documents package
(60% and 100 for the Tukwila Transit Center that provides design documentation, cost
information and environmental and geotechnical information to the City that allows for future
bidding of the project. This phase will begin from the work completed during Phase 3
described in the Tukwila Transit Center Final Design scope of work dated June 15, 2011 and
continue the design process and stakeholder coordination in preparation of bid documents
that will include the ability to meet the Regional Mobility grant requirements.
A work breakdown structure of five primary tasks has been developed for this Phase of the
work, recognizing an overall design timeline of six months. This includes a two -week City
Design Review period after both the 60% and Draft 100% submittals. Primary tasks, in
general, include the following:
Review and assembly of relevant information, including geotechnical and
environmental appropriate to completing the design phase of the project including the
Firestone Property, Northbound and Baker transit stops.
2. Preparation of stakeholder presentation materials and meeting summaries and
participation at meetings.
3. Preparation of construction documents (60% and 100% Draft and Final) plans and
specifications.
4. Construction cost estimates for the Transit Center (60% and 100
5. Assistance to the City in preparation of a building permit for the shelters.
The following scope describes the work to be conducted, and assumptions and deliverables
to be provided.
lask 5: Proiect Management
This task includes the day -to -day activities to be performed by the Consultant to manage and
administer the work to deliver quality work products that meet the needs of the City.
Final Transit Network Plan, Tukwila Urban Center Subarea, Perteet, Inc., December 2004.
November 11th, 2011
Page 5.
92
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
ASSUMPTIONS
Primary project management coordination will be through the Consultant Project
Manager and City Project Manager.
All Consultant requests for meetings with City staff shall come from the Consultant
Project Manager. Such requests will be issued to the City Project Manager.
All sub consultant requests for meetings will be coordinated through the Consultant
Project Manager or Consultant Design Coordinator (the latter if a design related
issue).
Steps will be taken to schedule meetings as far ahead as reasonable to secure
participation of invitees, City assistance may be requested from time -to -time to
expedite design or information collection related meetings.
The City will be responsible for providing meeting space and issuing invites to City
staff and other stakeholders for all stakeholder and city council meetings and
presentations.
The City will be responsible for providing base information such as existing plans,
previous studies, land surveys, GIS data, etc. The Consultant will coordinate with the
City to make sure that information requests are reasonable and do not overly burden
City staff.
The Consultant will be responsible for all work products delivered, and commits to
providing staff and resources to complete the work in a timely manner.
WORK ACTIVITIES
5.1. Contract Administration
This activity covers basic administration of the work including:
5.1.1. Preparation of a Project Schedule in MS Project, ongoing tracking of that
schedule, and reporting of any variances on a monthly basis. Issues identified
during the course of the work that have the potential to affect schedule will be
promptly identified for the City Project Manager (this is in addition to regular
monthly reporting).
5.1.2. Cost and project team time control.
5.1.3. Monthly invoicing and project progress reporting (report to be included with
invoice).
5.1.4. Sub consultant administration.
5.2. Meetings and Coordination
This includes general coordination and project management meetings; stakeholder
meetings are covered in Task 6. Meeting and coordination are expected to include the
following:
5.2.1. Design Review meetings with City staff (3) (At the start of 60% design, during
60% design and during 100% design tasks).
5.2.2. Internal design team coordination meetings.
5.2.3. Client coordination calls and ad -hoc coordination (Up to 6).
November 11th, 2011
Page 6.
93
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
5.3. Quality Control
5.3.1.All work products will be subject to internal quality review before issuance per
IBI Group quality control procedures.
DELIVERABLES
Project schedule
Invoices and monthly progress reports
Meeting agendas
Meeting notes
Task 6'. Stakeholder Coordination
This task will continue the stakeholder coordination efforts from the work completed earlier
during schematic and final design phases through the construction document phase by
assisting the City with communication with key stakeholders. Key stakeholders include the
City project team, King County Metro, adjacent property owners and businesses, council
committees, review boards and commissions. The Consultant will prepare presentation
materials as defined below.
ASSUMPTIONS
The City will be responsible for publicizing stakeholder meetings and for arranging
meeting logistics.
The Consultant will be responsible for the preparation one set of presentation
materials for the City's use at stakeholder meetings.
IBI will lead one (1) presentation for the Adjacent Property Owners and Tenants.
Meeting notes will be prepared for the meeting.
WORK ACTIVITIES
6.1. Preparation for Stakeholder Workshops
6.1.1. Stakeholder meeting agendas will be developed through collaborative planning
sessions involving the City Project Manager, Consultant Project Manager, and
other key staff.
6.1.2. The Consultant will prepare one set of graphics and a rendering that will be used
at all of the stakeholder meetings listed above. Presentation material will be
focused on the transit stations, urban design and landscape features. The
graphics prepared will reflect the reviewed and approved design plans.
6.2. Documentation of Stakeholder Workshops
6.2.1. The Consultant will provide the City with copies of meeting materials and
meeting notes for stakeholder events (paper and electronic).
November 11th, 2011
Page 7.
94
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
6.3. Public Art Program Identification and Coordination
6.3.1. The Consultant will work with the City to incorporate public art into the project.
The Consultant will coordinate the location of the art into the project site. The
Consultants effort is limited to coordination of the art piece and is limited to 16
hours as identified in the fee proposal. The work does not include any additional
design services or design modifications of the art to accommodate the piece into
the project. Additional design and coordination services if required will be
negotiated with the City prior to providing the services.
DELIVERABLES
One set of stakeholder meeting graphic materials and renderings
Stakeholder meeting notes /documentation
Fask T: Design Documents (60% and 100%
This task will prepare construction documents (60% and 100 design plans and
specifications for landscape architecture, civil, architectural, urban design, structural,
ITS /communications and electrical systems for the Northbound, Southbound and Baker
Transit Stops.
ASSUMPTIONS
A Value Engineering Study is not included as part of this scope of work. If required,
additional scope and fee will be negotiated with the City.
A building permit will be required for the shelter only. The City will prepare all other
permits.
Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding. The City will
provide Division 00 and 01 sections meeting federal and state funding requirements.
Detention and water quality is required for this project. The areas requiring water
quality treatment and pervious and impervious area changes will be documented in a
technical memo. The work required for this requirement will be combined with
proposed improvements within the Andover Park West improvement project.
Canopies and planter walls will be founded on conventional spread footings. The
design of pile foundations would be considered additional scope.
A single canopy design would be applied to all canopies at the Northbound and
Southbound transit stations. Baker Blvd. transit station will not include a shelter.
100% Draft Design Plans will be utilized for the Building Permit submittal no
additional plans will be prepared for the Building Permit
The City will provide comments for the 60% and Draft 100% Design submittals within
2 weeks of receiving the documents. The City will provide consolidated comments
that are non conflicting to the Consultant for incorporation into the next submittal.
November 11th, 2011
Page 8.
95
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
WORK ACTIVITIES
7.1. 60% Design
Plans and project specifications will be prepared to a 60% design level. One design
review meeting will be held during the 60% design task with key City staff. Progress
design drawings will be reviewed and key design issues and decisions discussed.
7.1.1. Civil The Consultant will develop 60% design documents covering drainage
facilities. The 60% design for utilities will include relocation; new utility services
that may be required for project. The plans will include the following: the final
grading of existing and installation of plans; pavement layout will include extent
of the new pavement for bus pullouts and /or plaza areas, and will include
pavement cross sections. The Consultant will also prepare 60% demolition
drawings for the Firestone canopy foundations.
7.1.2. Landscape Design 60% plans for landscape design documentation will be
developed for both the pedestrian plaza and transit center locations.
7.1.3. Urban Design The Consultant will develop 60% urban design project site plans
and details including Transit Center, Pedestrian Plaza and Crosswalk design.
7.1.4. Architecture Design 60% design architectural documentation of planters,
railing, signage, lighting, seating, plaza and shelter will be developed for the
transit center.
7.1.5. Structural The Consultant will develop 60% designs for structural elements
(planter walls, a single trellis, feature signs, unique light standards and a
standard canopy). The structural design for the transit center will include
foundation, planter wall, and framing plans and details for all sites.
7.1.6. Electrical The Consultant will develop 60% designs for site electrical power
service and distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will coordinate
any required discussions between the City, service utility, and design team
members to determine power availability and access. The Consultant will
develop 60% design lighting plans and coordinate lighting system standards with
the City.
7.1.7. ITS The Consultant will develop 60% designs for video surveillance cameras
for the transit center. The cameras will be an expansion of the City's existing
system and will not include a new operating system. The Consultant will develop
60% designs for a conduit layout for a future VMS display and connection to the
Rapidride technology pylon.
November 11th, 2011
Page 9.
.I
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
7.2. 100% Design
Plans and project specifications will be prepared for a complete design. One design
review meeting will be held during the 100% design task with key City staff. Progress
design drawings will be reviewed and key design issues and decisions discussed. A
draft 100% design submittal will be prepared and submitted to the City for Review. The
draft 100% design documents will be utilized for the submittal of the Building Permit to
the City of Tukwila.
A final 100% bid ready set of plans and specifications will be prepared. This set will
incorporate the final comments from the City's review and the Building Permit Review.
7.2.1. Civil The Consultant will develop 100% design documents covering drainage
facilities. The 100% design for utilities will include relocation; new utility services
that may be required for project. The plans will include the following: the final
grading of existing and installation of plans; pavement layout will include extent
of the new pavement for bus pullouts and /or plaza areas, and will include
pavement cross sections. The Consultant will prepare 100% demolition drawings
for the Firestone canopy foundations.
7.2.2. Landscape Design —100% plans for landscape design documentation will be
developed for both the pedestrian plaza and transit center locations.
7.2.3. Urban Design The Consultant will develop 100% urban design project site
plans and details including Transit Center, Pedestrian Plaza and Crosswalk
design.
7.2.4. Architectural Design 100% design architectural documentation of planters,
railing, signage, lighting, seating, plaza and shelter will be developed for the
transit center.
7.2.5. Structural The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for foundation,
planters, and shelter structure.
7.2.6. Electrical The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for site electrical
power service and distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will
coordinate any required discussions between the City, service utility, and design
team members to determine power availability and access. The Consultant will
develop final design lighting plans and coordinate lighting system standards with
the City.
7.2.7. ITS The Consultant will develop 100% design plans for video surveillance
cameras for the transit center. The Consultant will develop final designs for a
conduit layout for a future VMS display and a connection to the RapidRide
technology pylon.
DELIVERABLES
60% Design Plans and Specifications submittal for all disciplines
Draft 100% Design Plans and Specifications submittal for all disciplines (will also be
used as the submittal for Building Permit)
Final 100% Design Plans and Specifications (Bid- ready) submittal for all disciplines
November 11th, 2011
Page 10.
97
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
�s l gates (60 end
Cost estimates will be developed for the 60% and 100% submittals with a level of accuracy
commensurate with the level of design. The cost estimates will include the cost of
construction for the design and include any potential risks that have been identified as a
result of the conceptual engineering and design tasks. The cost estimate will be subdivided
into costs for each of the disciplines listed below.
ASSUMPTION(S)
Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding
WORK ACTIVITIES
8.1. 60% Cost Estimating
8.1.1. The Consultant will develop an 60% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape,
urban, architectural, structural, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical
design.
8.2. 100% Cost Estimating
8.2.1. The Consultant will develop a 100% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape,
urban, architectural, structural, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical
design.
DELIVERABLE(S)
Lump sum construction cost estimates for 60% and 100% documentation.
I as Assistance with BUilding Permi
ASSUMPTIONS:
City staff has indicated that the only City permit required will be the building permit for
the station canopies.
The Consultant will communicate with the City on corrections or other issues that
arise during review, up to the level of effort identified in the Cost Estimate.
All permit fees will be paid by the City directly and are not included in the cost
estimate.
The City will lead the submittal and tracking of the building permit and coordinate with
the reviewers during the review and approval process.
The Consultant team effort for this task is limited to 20 hours as defined in the
attached fee proposal.
November 11th, 2011
Page 11.
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
WORK ACTIVITIES
9.1. Building Permit
The Consultant team will assist the City in obtaining the building permit for the station
canopies by assembling the building permit application materials which include drawings
prepared for the 100% Draft Design plans and specifications. Additional drawings will not be
prepared for the permit submittal. The Consultant will prepare required forms and assemble a
draft application package for City review. The City will lead the submittal of the application
and track the progress of the permit package through the approval process and coordinate
with the Consultant Team on questions and revisions during the approval process. The
Consultant team effort for this task is limited to 20 hours as defined in the attached fee
proposal.
DELIVERABLES
Building permit application (draft, final)
PHASE 5: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPTIONAL)
Task Bid Support
ASSUMPTIONS
The City will be responsible for all aspects of the procurement not spelled out
specifically below.
No Conformed set of documents including addenda will be prepared.
DELIVERABLES
The Consultant will make a "camera ready" or digital record of the Final bid
documents available to the City for their use in the copying and dispersal of
documents to prospective bidders.
The Consultant will respond to bidder questions forwarded by the City with Addenda
information in the form of text and drawings necessary and appropriate to obtain
bids.
T tCtn Support
ASSUMPTIONS
The City will retain personnel as required to manage the day -to -day administration of
the construction.
No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a
later date.
DELIVERABLES
Review and comment on submittals
Review and comment on requests for information
November 11th, 2011
Page 12.
w e
IBI GROUP
SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER
FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
PHASES 3 AND 4
Review and respond to owner questions
Issue clarifications, including supplemental drawings
Maintain a log of all submittals, requests for information, owner questions,
supplemental drawings and issued clarifications
The consultants will make site visits to review progress
SCHEDULE AND FEE
The Consultant team will conduct the work described in Phase 4 Construction Documents
in an overall timeline of six months with two additional 2 week periods for City review of the
design deliverables after 60% and 100% draft design. The additional services work for Phase
3 described in this document will be conducted simultaneously with the Phase 4 tasks and
will continue as described to completion of the acquisition tasks. A definitive timeline for this
work cannot be estimated; however, the work will be coordinated with the City and regular
status reports will be provided. CLS sub contracting of the WSDOT- approved appraiser has
been included at an estimated maximum cost of $5,000; however, this is going out to bid per
Task 3.3 so this cost is not exact.
The estimated fee for the Phases 3 and 4 work is summarized below:
Phase 3 Additional Services and Phase 4: Construction Documents $429,000
Phase 5: Bid and Construction Support
Additional Services not included in this Scope of Work
Hazardous Materials
November 11th, 2011
HtLf
$16,386
Page 13.
100
r
E
U
O
N
C
O
U
O
c
rn�
m
pa
W D 9
C C t
b F
a v h
c c u
F a`
!e �m
Y A t
IR CL
�i
a
a
=N M�
o c
o Cf
0 0
N
O O
W OO
O O
o
o C1
W
a
0 5
n
N w w
as
R
M
w
Q
m_Q
o b
o� a pal
W
Z
000tl o00 O000D d.e.�Op'= �0 4
P
M N
N Q
r r Y
b
o .aNaC n"o`Op 335
r
o 0oq o0o q o0op ooC' oD O��
G
r, ry
r--- j---------- ry pp Oo0
b b
m
Qua
r- m
a'a9 �dag ?oo.�
2 _a a
7¢' N 7i U mt 1
r X 8 $8
M u a
F W
w
v N v
LL m fmO?
E v
w
C
a
r
0
EXHIBIT
LL
i
S
a
G
m
N
101
102
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Andover Park West
Project No. 98810404, Contract 06 -019
Supplemental Agreement No. 14
ISSUE
Supplement to the IBI Group on the combined Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center design and
Andover Park West in the amount of $313,037.00.
BACKGROUND
In August 2011, the City modified the agreement with IBI Group to add in the design of the Andover
Park W water main replacement to the previously existing contract to design the Andover Park W
widening project. Combining these design efforts is a prudent use of public funds, intended to capitalize
on related work, much as the Andover Park W widening project was combined with the Tukwila Urban
Center Transit Center design work. All three projects are logically interconnected. Design of the road
widening and the water main replacement is currently at 30
DISCUSSION
This supplemental scope of work adds new scope and fee associated with final design and PS &E for
the Andover Park W widening and water main replacement projects. Design work associated with the
road widening and water main replacement has been separated for project accounting.
Fiscal Impact: Supplement No. 14's fee amount associated with the Andover Park W Widening Project
is $167,693.00 and the fee for the Andover Park W Water Main Replacement project is $145,344.00 for
a total supplement amount of $313,037.00. New CIP pages are attached to represent the funds needed
for design in 2012, with right -of way costs reduced (page 17 and 89, Proposed 2012 CIP).
This project is dependent on successful grant funding of $1,420,000.00. Results from the State
Transportation Improvement Board will be released Friday, November 18, 2011, so an update will be
given at the November 21 Transportation Committee on the status of the grant funding.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Supplement No. 14 to Contract No. 06 -019 with the IBI Group in the amount of $313,037.00
and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December
5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachments: Page 17 and 89, Proposed 2012 CIP
Supplemental Agreement #14
WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO Supp #14 IBI APW Water Design 11 -18 -11 docx
103
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant 0
Proposed Grant 355 1,065 1,420
Mitigation Actual 316 316
Impact Fees 101 5 106
City Oper. Revenue (340) 5 444 253 0 0 0 0 0 362
TOTAL SOURCES 77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 0 2,204
Project Location
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program
17
GIS
104
2012 to 2017
PROJECT:
Andover Park West (Tukwila Pkwy Strander Blvd) Project No. 98810404 zone 1
DESCRIPTION:
Study and implement revised channelization.
JUSTIFICATION:
Revising left turn lanes will reduce accidents and lessen congestion.
Major portion of Andover Park W at intersections are complete. Next phase is to revise turn lanes along
STATUS:
length of project. To be coordinated with Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center and APW water improvements.
MAINT.IMPACT:
Negligible.
Project is on impact fee list and goal is to begin project by 2011. Design report completed in 1991 was updated
COMMENT:
in 2009. ACME Bowling mitigation of $111 k and Westfield Mall of $205k in 2007. Proposed TIB grant of $1.42m
in 2012. Partial match from APW water overlay for $346k (see page 89).
FINANCIAL
Through Estimated
(in $000's)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 ,BEYOND TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
77 10 278 365
Land(RIW)
80 80
Const. Mgmt.
41 122 163
Construction
400 1,196 1,596
TOTAL EXPENSES
77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 0 2,204
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant 0
Proposed Grant 355 1,065 1,420
Mitigation Actual 316 316
Impact Fees 101 5 106
City Oper. Revenue (340) 5 444 253 0 0 0 0 0 362
TOTAL SOURCES 77 10 799 1,318 0 0 0 0 0 2,204
Project Location
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program
17
GIS
104
CITY OF TUKWILA CAPITAL PROJECT SUMMARY
2012 to 2017
PROJECT: Andover Park W /Strander New Water Main Project No. 99840105
DESCRIPTION: Design and construct 2,100 LF of a 12" pipe along Andover Park West from Tukwila Pkwy to Strander Blvd
JUSTIFICATION: Aging cast iron pipe and deficiencies under fire flow conditions.
STATUS: Coordinated with the Transit Center and Andover Park West street improvements
MAINT. IMPACT: Improved service would reduce maintenance liability.
COMMENT:
FINANCIAL
Through
Estimated
(in $000's)
2010
2011
2012
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 BEYOND
TOTAL
EXPENSES
Design
165
165
Land (R/W)
0
Const. Mgmt.
177
177
Construction
1,212
1,212
TOTAL EXPENSES
0
0
1,554
0 0 0 0 0 0
1,554
FUND SOURCES
Awarded Grant
0
Proposed Grant
0
Mitigation Actual
0
Mitigation Expected
0
Utility Revenue
0
0
1,554
0 0 0 0 0 0
1,554
TOTAL SOURCES
0
0
1,554
0 0 0 0 0 0
1,554
Project Location
bS 15f
C EIM";
GIS
2012 2017 Capital Improvement Program 89 105
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NUMBER 14
TO
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 06 -019
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Tukwila,
Washington, herein -after referred to as "the City and IBI Group, hereinafter referred to as "the
Consultant in consideration of the mutual benefits, terms, and conditions hereinafter specified.
The City desires to supplement the agreement entered into with the Consultant and executed on,
February 23. 2006 and identified as Agreement No. 06 -019. All provisions in the basic
agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
1. Scope of Services, is hereby changed to include work described in Exhibit A for
additional design work on the Andover Park West project.
2. Payment, shall be amended as follows:
A. Payment for the work provided by the Consultant shall be made as provided on
Exhibit B attached hereto, provided that the total amount of payment to the Consultant
shall not exceed $313,037 without express written modification of the Agreement signed
by the City. The maximum amount payable under this agreement as supplemented
inclusive of all fees and other costs is now $1,534,852.
3. Time for Performance, shall be amended as follows:
The Consultant shall perform all services and provide all work product required pursuant
to this Agreement by December 31, 2012, unless an extension of such time is granted in
writing by the City.
DATED this day of 20
CITY OF TUKWILA
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
CONSULTANT
By:
Printed Name:
Title:
106
Cit O f T
ANDOVER PARK WEST IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN
SCOPE OF INORK
NOVENIRSER 11, 2011
IBI
GROUP
107
|a| GROUP SCOPE opWORK
�m LE OF CONTENTS
PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN 1
Task 9� Mroect MamaQement...-~
Task 10: Stakeho|derCoordi0atiom ,~..........,.........~.......,...........2
T ask 1%COnStr0Cb0i'l DOCUrnents(60% and 1O0%) -...~~'.-..........~~—........~..~~.3
Tas��2: Ccst E�b�ste� �O� and .....5
PHASE 3: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPT|ONAL) 5
Task 13, B6d Support. .~~.~.~'....5
SCHEDULEAND FEE G
November 11, 2011
pane/
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
City of Tukwila
ANDOVER PARK WEST IMPROVEMENTS
PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN
PHASE 2: FINAL DESIGN
The objective of this Phase of the project is to develop final design documents (60% and 100 for
Andover Park West improvements that provide design documentation, cost information and
environmental and geotechnical information to the City that allows for future bidding of the project.
A work breakdown structure of five primary tasks has been developed for this Phase of the work,
covering in general:
1. Conduct and management of the work.
2. Preparation of stakeholder presentation materials and meeting summaries and
participation at meetings.
3. Review and assembly of relevant information and investigation, including geotechnical and
environmental appropriate to completing the design phase of the project.
4. Preparation of construction documents (60% and 100 plans and specifications.
5. Construction cost estimate for Andover Park West Improvements (60% and 100
The following scope describes the work to be conducted, assumptions and deliverables to be
provided.
Ta Project Management
This task includes the day -to -day activities to be performed by the Consultant to manage and
administer the work and deliver quality work products that meet the needs of the City.
ASSUMPTION(S)
Primary project management coordination will be through the Consultant Project
Manager and City Project Manager.
All Consultant requests for meetings with City staff shall come from the Consultant
Project Manager. Such requests will be issued to the City Project Manager.
All sub consultant requests for meetings will be coordinated through the Consultant
Project Manager or Consultant Design Coordinator (the latter if a design related
issue).
Steps will be taken to schedule meetings as far ahead as reasonable to secure
participation of invitees, City assistance may be requested from time -to -time to
expedite design or information collection related meetings.
The City will be responsible for providing meeting space and issuing invites to City
staff and other stakeholders for all stakeholder and city council meetings and
presentations.
The Consultant will be responsible for all work products delivered, and commits to
providing staff and resources to complete the work in a timely manner.
November 11, 2011 IBI
GROUP
109
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
WORK ACTIVITIES
9.1 Contract Administration
This activity covers basic administration of the work including:
9.1.1 Preparation of a Project Schedule in MS Project, ongoing tracking of that
schedule, and reporting of any variances on a monthly basis. Issues identified
during the course of the work that have the potential to affect schedule will be
promptly identified for the City Project Manager (this is in addition to regular
monthly reporting).
9.1.2 Cost and staff time control.
9.1.3 Monthly client invoicing and project progress reporting (report to be included with
invoice).
9.1.4 Sub consultant administration.
9.2 Meetings and Coordination
This includes general coordination and project management meetings. Meeting and
coordination are expected to include the following, with the number of required
meetings determined when the overall schedule has been developed:
9.2.1 Monthly meetings with City staff.
9.2.2 Internal design team coordination meetings.
9.2.3 Bi- weekly client coordination calls and ad -hoc coordination.
9.3 Quality Control
9.3.1 All work products will be subject to internal quality review before issuance per
IBI Group quality control procedures.
DELIVERABLES
Project schedule
Invoices and monthly progress reports
Meeting agendas
Meeting notes
Task Stakeholder Coordination
This task will continue the Stakeholder coordination efforts through final design by assisting the City
with communication with key stakeholders. Key stakeholders include the City project team, council
committees, review boards and commissions and adjacent property owners. In each case, the
Consultant will prepare one set of presentation materials for all stakeholder workshops and
generate notes /documentation of the outcomes.
ASSUMPTION(S)
The City will be responsible for publicizing stakeholder meetings and for arranging
meeting logistics.
The Consultant will be responsible for producing one set of stakeholder meeting
presentation materials, and for producing meeting notes for the stakeholder meeting.
November 11, 2011
Page 2
110
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
WORK ACTIVITIES
10.1 Preparation for Stakeholder Workshops
10.1.1 Stakeholder meeting agendas will be developed through collaborative planning
sessions involving the City Project Manager, Consultant Project Manager, and
other key staff.
10.1.2The Consultant will prepare one set of graphics and a rendering for the
stakeholder meetings. The graphics prepared will reflect the Draft Final Design.
10.2 Documentation of Stakeholder Workshops
10.2.1 The Consultant will provide the City with copies of meeting materials and
meeting notes for all stakeholder events (paper and electronic).
DELIVERABLE(S)
One set of stakeholder meeting graphic materials and rendering.
Stakeholder meeting notes /documentation.
Task 11: Construction Documents and
This task will include the design development (60 and final (100 design plans and
specifications for civil, urban design, landscape architecture, ITS /communications and electrical
systems.
ASSUMPTION(S)
A Value Engineering Study is not anticipated as part of the work.
Per conversations with the City, the previously scoped Phase 1 B work that included
sewer line improvements is no longer required. This work has been removed from
this phase of the scope and fee.
Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding. City shall provide
Contract boilerplate, and Divisions 0, and 1, and all City General Special Provisions
in this format.
Proposed contours are not included for the Plans. All grading information will be
conveyed with typical section and control line profile.
Storm water runoff assessment and report will be based upon 2009 King County
Surface Water Design Manual and will follow requirements of the City. Stormwater
assessment shall include areas disturbed with the Tukwila Transit Center project.
Water quality and detention facilities, if required, will be designed to address needs
for both projects.
City shall lead public outreach effort to coordinate utility service transfer issues with
all adjacent properties.
Structural design and layout of retaining walls for roadway excavation is not included
within this work.
Waterline improvement plan details will include only special details necessary for the
work. City and State standard plans are not included within the planset. City and
State standard plans will be referenced only within the Plans. Contract specifications
may include City and State standard plans within appendix.
November 11, 2011
Page 3
111
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
WORK ACTIVITIES
11.1 Civil
11.1.1The Consultant will develop final design documents covering drainage facilities.
Work includes storm drainage technical report showing tributary areas and
calculations for required detention and water quality. Report will loosely follow
King County report format, but will be abridged, and will not include assessment
of downstream analysis, offsite analysis, Construction stormwater pollution
prevention worksheet forms, dedication and indemnification clause, bond
quantities, or any covenants or easements.
11.1.2The final design for utilities will include relocation and new utility services that
may be required for project. These include both public utilities being disturbed as
well as private utilities requiring relocation.
11.1.3The final design for roadway improvements for widening to accommodate five
(5) lanes and two -inch asphalt grind and overlay, including design of grading and
pavement markings for the speed table at the intersection with Baker. Plans
include removal plan, typical sections paving plans, channelization plans and
temporary erosion control plans.
11.1.4Waterline Design: the Consultant shall develop final plans from schematic water
main design to replace the existing eight -inch waterline with a 12 -inch waterline.
The design shall include proposed service connections to existing services, fire
hydrant placement, service connections, and other necessary appurtenances.
The design shall include critical construction staging sequences. Plans shall
include plan and profile, and miscellaneous detail sheets as necessary. Work
shall also include cost estimate and contract specifications.
11.1.5 Sewer Line: this work is no longer required and has been removed from this
project.
11.2 Landscape Design
11.2.1 Final landscape design documentation will be developed for the roadway.
11.3 Urban Design
11.3.1 The Consultant will develop final urban design project site plans and details
including for the Streetscape Design for Andover Park West.
11.4 Electrical
11.4.1 The Consultant will develop final designs for site electrical power service and
distribution, and receptacle locations. The Consultant will coordinate any
required discussions between the City, service utility, and design team members
to determine power availability and access.
11.4.2The Consultant will develop a final design lighting plans and coordinate lighting
system standards with the City.
11.5 ITS /Signals
11.5.1 The Consultant will develop final designs for communication system
requirements to maintain the existing signalized intersections and provide for
future ITS requirements through installation of conduit.
November 11, 2011
Page 4
112
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
DELIVERABLE(S)
Design Development (60 documentation submittal for all disciplines.
Buoyancy calculations shall be included under separate cover.
Final Design (100 ready- for -bid design documentation submittal for all disciplines.
TaAl2 Cost Estirnates any
Cost estimates will be developed for the 60% and 100% submittals with a level of accuracy
commensurate with the level of design. The cost estimates will include the cost of construction for
the design and include any potential risks that have been identified as a result of the conceptual
engineering and design tasks. The cost estimate will be subdivided into costs for each of the
disciplines listed below.
ASSUMPTION(S)
Information will be prepared in CSI format for Lump Sum bidding.
WORK ACTIVITIES
12.1 60% Cost Estimating
12. 1.1 The Consultant will develop a 60% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape,
urban, ITS /Communications, mechanical and electrical design.
12.2 100% Cost Estimating
12.2.1 The Consultant will develop a 100% cost estimate based on the civil, landscape,
urban, ITS /Communications /Signals, and electrical design.
DELIVERABLE(S)
Lump sum construction cost estimates for 60% and 100% documentation.
PHASE 3: BID AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT (OPTIONAL)
Task 3: Bid Support
ASSUMPTION(S)
The City will be responsible for all aspects of the procurement not spelled out
specifically below.
No Conformed set of documents (including addenda) will be prepared.
No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a
later date.
DELIVERABLE(S)
13.1 The Consultant will make a "camera ready" or digital record of the Final bid documents
available to the City for their use in the copying and dispersal of documents to
prospective bidders.
13.2 The Consultant will respond to bidder questions forwarded by the City with Addenda
information in the form of text and drawings necessary and appropriate to obtain bids.
November 11, 2011
Page 5
113
IBI GROUP SCOPE OF WORK
Task b l r on Support
ASSUMPTION(S)
The City will retain personnel as required to manage the day to day administration of
the construction.
No budget is included for this work. Final Budget and Scope will be determined at a
later date.
DELIVERABLE(S)
14.1 The Consultant shall provide the following:
Review and comment on submittals.
Review and comment on requests for information.
Review and respond to owner questions.
Issue clarifications, including supplemental drawings.
Maintain a log of all submittals, requests for information, owner questions,
supplemental drawings and issued clarifications.
The consultants will make site visits to review progress.
SCHEDULE AND FEE
Phase 2 work will begin upon completion of Phases 1A and 1 B. Phase 3 work will be refined
during Phase 2 work and finalized with the City prior to the development of a fee proposal. In
order to meet strict City budgeting requirements, this work will be split into two discrete
budgets for the roadway improvements and waterline replacement. These efforts will be
shown clearly on invoicing under the correct City budget line items.
The fee for the project has been prepared for the tasks outlined in this document for Phase 2.
The estimated fee for the work is summarized below:
Phase 2 Roadway Improvements:
Phase 2 Waterline Replacement
November 11, 2011
$167,693
$145,344
Page 6
114
EXHIBIT A
0
c o
W
"r
ui
M
n
f0
w
y
O
U
H
U
W
O
a
Q
H
O
a
0
M
N
N
Lo
H
N
I
a
N
m
N
a
a
l0
Y
m
N
115
m r
t
N O
T
N
N
r ID W
N
LL
44 t9
iR W
W
2 N
c
m a
a o
cb
a
o
h
oo on o co -'t
o
o
P-
o
O
is w
uj
i
O
a.
a
w
o 0 o O o O o'
o O O O O O O o 0
o N
o 0 0 0
0
C
c
N
O 0ti 0 0
oco 0) a
ti_
O
�n v�
0
Nm 'A01
N N
cc
r
cc
Z
C
O
N
0 0 0 O O
00 00 O N M
c
O
N
N N
Nl��h
V V
l6
64 6
O
N
0
O
N
C
L
o X0 o 0
00 000 0
S
O
o
v�u
V
LL
LL
LL
LL
a E
co (D W N
N N Lo W O
N N?
Q
O
0 O t0
m p7 N P')
0
�N„ �Y"„
M 6 M
f9 H
N
CL
G
E
o
i
E
AE
Y
D—
RO' m
3
ro o
i•.
o
b.
Y3 c
w
°a'
CL
w
EE
C
r
a
at
s
I n
LL
c c m
z
a
Y R m
L
y
C (p O
C
O,
LL
O Y U)
N
V y m t"
N N a
c d n
Z` �..rp. c O, =0 �n O
E
E cA
G /0 t
a
W C C
N "_V W W U
O N" O
Q dw
O oU' -3 d
y
�p m U
«S N C« .Or.
0
-b U o Q
uj
m N y
U- L) 2C7 d 0
(j
UJ5W pco �,3$
V m
LL O U
V
CN N
-7 N M'�t N M
N,
Q
Cl! M P O O t+
r s C� C� UJ r
cM
M
n
f0
w
y
O
U
H
U
W
O
a
Q
H
O
a
0
M
N
N
Lo
H
N
I
a
N
m
N
a
a
l0
Y
m
N
115
EXHIBIT
M W
U! y
H i U
w
o a
U J
L
0
a
a
N
O
M
O
0
N
N
A
N
a�
a
N
Y
m
N
116
P
0
Oq7
O
f�0
ai
f
LL
A9
fR
Vi
W
v Y
V
A
o 0 o fij_
0 00
0;"
o 0 0 0
o 0
0 �y
p
o p
0 0
N
j
X
H
0000
O
000
p
0
C90444
0
m
c
C
�a
c
c
t
fq
L
to
Q
O
0) 01
o q
O
N V
A pip"
w
w
w
a
a
ooA
o oq
o�00 or
0 0"Z
4
0
LO LO
aMO�M
t^
0
f- m
co
Z
Z
C
o 00
o o
o0 o0 o
N�
c
n
OD
U
`a
w
.....c.>
y c
i3
N
G
p
U
LL
LL
LL
CL
Y
a
Y
N 1�
(O aP
N Q
a Q
N O N V
r-t7 N
W OD
f0
:<O
d
a
to
4d
Q
LL
O N
N
c 3
a
a, E
LL
a
tL
m
U
L.
w O
L
T ,y v
m
v
R m
C
c.0
N p
p o
m Y
0
R O
a lLa
O C a
Y
m
m
y
d
NI m
Z 0
U 0
0.
E 0•
c
O
E
C L K
N
W W
U y o
0 3 t C
Qaw
��v
rn
pm E
n
��v rn 3
�0U
Z v 2
N C fn
u U o
i N
LJ
4l. p U d
a�. a
CJ J W f"
O (00
6T} 9 LL 0] 'p U
r-1
N a
U) N
N M d; IQ
N V_
a
{LUfS M M W O>
O O
r– e-
r N N
W n m M V
HV
,_:47
CL
a
EXHIBIT
M W
U! y
H i U
w
o a
U J
L
0
a
a
N
O
M
O
0
N
N
A
N
a�
a
N
Y
m
N
116
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center, Project No. 90610402
Ordinance for Acquisition of Right -of -Way, Permanent Easements and
Temporary Construction Easements
ISSUE
Approve Ordinance to acquire property for the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project.
DISCUSSION
Final design for Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center is underway. Right -of -way is needed along
the project in order to construct the proposed improvements. A permanent easement from
Westfield Mall is necessary and the parking variance granted to Westfield covers most of the
easement area. Some additional easement area is required to allow for the fully expanded
Transit Center. Four temporary construction easements and one dedication of right -of -way are
also necessary. The project is scheduled for advertisement in mid -2012 in accordance with the
Transit Mobility Grant, once the right -of -way (ROW) is secured. The details are shown in the
following table with approximate property square footage:
The attached ordinance provides the authority to acquire the needed property. As with previous
projects that have involved acquiring additional property, the City will do everything within its
power to work cooperatively with the property owners. However, should the City not be
successful in these efforts, condemnation of the property would be required. Letters have been
mailed to the owners notifying them of this potential condemnation and the Council's schedule
for ordinance approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the properties for completion of the TUC Transit
Center and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and
subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachment: Ordinance with legal descriptions and maps
WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\N- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO ROW Ordinance 11- 18- 11.docx
117
Temporary
Permanent
ROW Required. Construction Easement
Easement
Parcel Nos.
Owners
(SF) Required (sf)
Required (sf)
Parcel G, BSP
#L10 -032
WEA Southcenter Firestone)
...8_
Parcels A G,
BSP #L10 -032
WEA Southcenter
6,119
18,318
0226100010
Open Frame, LLC (Calif Pizza)
6,429 2,121
0223100075
OB Fife Property II, LLC (Acura)
891
The attached ordinance provides the authority to acquire the needed property. As with previous
projects that have involved acquiring additional property, the City will do everything within its
power to work cooperatively with the property owners. However, should the City not be
successful in these efforts, condemnation of the property would be required. Letters have been
mailed to the owners notifying them of this potential condemnation and the Council's schedule
for ordinance approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve Ordinance authorizing acquisition of the properties for completion of the TUC Transit
Center and consider this item at the November 28, 2011 Committee of the Whole and
subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular meetings.
Attachment: Ordinance with legal descriptions and maps
WAPW Eng \PROJECTS\N- RW RS Projects \06RW02 Transit Center \INFO MEMO ROW Ordinance 11- 18- 11.docx
117
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING
FOR THE ACQUISITION OF INTERESTS IN LAND FOR THE
PURPOSE OF COMPLETING THE TUKWILA TRANSIT
CENTER PROJECT; PROVIDING FOR CONDEMNATION,
APPROPRIATION, TAKING OF LAND AND PROPERTY
RIGHTS NECESSARY THEREFORE; PROVIDING FOR
PAYMENT THEREOF, AND DIRECTING THE INITIATION OF
APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED
BY LAW FOR SAID CONDEMNATION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2011 -2016 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), by Resolution No. 1730; and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2005, the City Council amended the Transportation
Element of the Comprehensive Plan, by Ordinance No. 2108, which included the
Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project as a high priority project necessary to
provide quality transit service and complement adjacent land uses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the public health, safety, necessity and
convenience demand that said project be undertaken at this time and that in order to
carry out the project it is necessary at this time for the City to acquire interests and
rights to the properties described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares it necessary and in the best interest
of the public that interests in the land and property rights hereinafter described be
condemned, appropriated, and taken for public use, subject to the making or paying of
just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner provided by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of the planned final action was handled in accordance with
RCW 8.25.290 to include publication in "The Seattle Times" and "Daily Journal of
Commerce" on November 21 and November 28, 2011;
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Aquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11
SK:bjs Page 1 of 3
118
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The land and property rights within the City of Tukwila, King County,
Washington, commonly known as a portion of Andover Park West near Baker
Boulevard and further described in the attached Exhibits A through D, are necessary for
construction of the Tukwila Urban Center Transit Center Project described above,
subject to making or paying just compensation to the owners thereof in the manner
provided by law.
Section 2. The City of Tukwila specifically finds construction of the project to be a
public use, specifically the lengthening of the existing bus pull -out on the west side of
Andover Park West, widening a portion of Andover_ Park West to accommodate a new
bus pull --out, and construction of an improved on- street transit center including the
improvement or installation of custom bus shelters, street furniture, pedestrian plazas,
and the related construction or addition of curb, gutter and sidewalk, signalization,
illumination, landscaping, irrigation, storm drainage and storm detention. The City
Council specifically finds construction of the project to be necessary and in the best
interests of the citizens.
Section 3. The cost and expense of acquiring said property rights shall be paid
from the 2011 -2013 Regional Mobility Grant awarded to the City of Tukwila by the
Washington State Department of Transportation, from general funds of the City of
Tukwila, and from other monies applicable thereto that the City may have available or
may obtain. The Director of the Public Works Department or his designee is hereby
authorized to negotiate with and make offers to the owners of said land or property for
the purposes of making or paying just compensation, and to approve the payment of
just compensation as negotiated with said owners or as ordered by the Court.
Section 4. In the absence of negotiated purchases with the affected property
owners, the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to undertake proceedings
provided by law to condemn, appropriate, and take the property necessary to carry out
the provisions of this ordinance. The City Attorney is further authorized to approve and
enter into any and all such agreements, stipulations, and orders necessary to carry out
the provisions of this ordinance, including for the payment of just compensation as
agreed to with the property owners or as ordered by the Court.
Section 5. Corrections by City Clerk or Code Reviser. Upon approval of the
City Attorney, the City Clerk and the code reviser are authorized to make necessary
corrections to this ordinance, including the correction of clerical errors; references to
other local, state or federal laws, codes, rules, or regulations; or ordinance numbering
and section /subsection numbering.
Section 6. Severability. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance or its application to any person or situation should be held to be
invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
W: Word Processing \Ordinances\Aquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11
SK:bjs Page 2 of 3
119
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the
remaining portions of this ordinance or its application to any other person or situation.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance or a summary thereof shall be published
in the official newspaper of the City, and shall take effect and be in full force five days
after passage and publication as provided by law.
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TUKWILA, WASHINGTON, at
a Regular Meeting thereof this day of 2011.
ATTEST /AUTHENTICATED:
Christy O'Flaherty, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
Shelley M. Kerslake, City Attorney
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
Filed with the City Clerk:
Passed by the City Council:
Published:
Effective Date:
Ordinance Number:
Andover Park West Right -of -Way Take Legal Description and Map
Northbound Transit Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and Map
Exhibit B
Southbound Transit Easement Legal Description
Southbound Transit Center Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and
Map (2 pages)
Exhibit C Canopy Easement Legal Description and Map
Exhibit D Temporary Construction Easement Legal Description and Map
W: Word Processing \OrdinancesrAquisition of land- Transit Center project 11 -16 -11
SK:bjs
Page 3 of 3
120
EXHIBIT A
City of Tukwila
Tax Parcel No. 02231000010
Andover Park West Right of Way Take
That portion of Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. L05 -025, recorded under
Recording No. 20050928900006, records of King County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2;
Thence South 00° 11'3 8" East, along the west line thereof and the east margin of Andover Park West, a
distance of 12.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along said east margin through the following courses:
South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 23.21 feet;
Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 5.50 feet;
Thence South 00° 11'38" East a distance of 250.50 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
northeast and having a radius of 50.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 55 °28'55" a distance of 48.42
feet;
Thence leaving said east margin, North 00 °11'38" West a distance of 314.91 feet;
Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 16.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington,
The above described easement areas contain 6,429 square feet, more or less.
kC I t
r n
127 r
IAN�
P:\P09 \09603.13 Final Design \docs\IBI Tukwila APW Right of Way Take.doc
121
EXHIBIT MAP I PAR 0 223100020
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER NW COR. LOT 2
ANDOVER PARK WEST POB
RIGHT OF WAY TAKE
W CONC. DR.
E'
PARCEL 0223100010
LINE TABLE
LINE I BEARING I LENGTH Il
L341 12.04 I 12.04
L351 S89'48'22 "W I 16.17 a
o o• o
L36 S00 1'38 "E 23.21 m p
L371 S89'48'22 "WI 5.501
/C
CURVE TABLE
CURVE I LENGTH RADIUS DELTA Lr
C211 48.42 50.001 55'28'55"
ASPH.
BLDG.
AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY TAKE
L
CONC
q Y
Fp 11278 0 i I
���•c <crrrrrrr��
I
BAKER S89 '42'31"E
BL VD.
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.20141 f. 425.827.5043 SCALE: 1" T. so'
PACE FILE: DATE: /11 B FW
Civil I Structural I Planning Survey DATE: O NO.: BY: FW
PROJ. N0.:09603.13
An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com
122
City of Tukwila
Tax Parcel No. 02231000010
Northbound Transit Temporary Construction Easement. Description
That portion of Lot 2 of City of Tukwila Boundary Line Adjustment No. L05 -025, recorded under
Recording No. 20050928900006, records of King County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 2;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East, along the west line thereof and the cast margin of Andover Park West, a
distance of 12.04 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement herein described;
Thence North 89 0 48'22" East, at right: angles to said east margin, a distance of 16.1.7 feet;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East:, parallel with the west line of said Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park
West a distance of 31.4.91 feet to the south line of said Lot 2, and the beginning of a non- tangent curve
concave to the northeast from which the radius point bears North 34'19'27" Fast a distance of 50.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 32 °45'54" a distance of 28.59
feet;
Thence North 00'1729" East a distance of 20.00 feet;
Thence North 89 °42'31 West, parallel with said south line of Lot 2 a distance of 3.39 feet to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave to the northeast and having a radius of 30.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 38"24'04" a distance of 20.1.1
feet;
Thence North 00 °11'38" West, parallel with said west line of Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park
West, a distance of 302.03 feet;
Thence South 89 0 48'22" West, at right angles to said west line, a distance of 21.17 feet to said west line
of said Lot 2 and east margin of Andover Park West;
Thence South 009 1'38" Fast, along said west line and east margin a distance. of 5.00 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington,
The above described easement areas contain 2,121 square feet, more or less.
i AI'09 \09603. I3 Final Design\docABI 'rukivila Northbound Transit Temp Esiait.doe
123
EXHIBIT MAP I PAR 0 223100020
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER I P NW COR. LOT 2
NORTHBOUND TEMPORARY L 55
CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT L CONC. DR.
LINE TABLE PARCEL 0223100010
LINE BEARING I LENGTH I 5.00'
L34 SOO'11'38 "E I 12.041 V) I 0
L351 S89'48'22 "WI 16.17 01 rn
L361 S00'1 1'38 "E 1 23.21
L37 S89'48'22 "WI 5.50
ti
L38 S89'48'22 "WI 21.171 I r*I �OO�.�ppp0
L391 N89'42'31 "WI 3.391 N
L401 N00 17'29 E I 20.00 I °a
m
CURVE TABLE
1 CURVE I LENGTH I RADIUS I DELTA
C211 48.421 50.001 55'28'55"
C221 20.111 30.001 38'24'04"
C231 28.591 50.001 32'45'54"
y ASPH.
y BLDG.
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
��EASEMENT AREA I
DETAIL 1 -7-- 7 I �i
i
•iD CONC
lb
I
I 1 SEE DETAIL
OPPOSITE
A BA
9 I BLVD.
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 f• 425.827.5043 SCALE: t" T. 50'
CIPSCE FILE: DAT /11 B FW
Civil Structural Planning Survey DATE: OJ. NO.: BY: FW
An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com
PROJ. N0.:09603.13
124
EXHIBIT B
City of Tukwila
Parcel A and G Binding Site Plan #L10 -032
Tax Parcel No. 9202470010 and 9202470070
Southbound Transit Easement Description
That portion of Parcels A and G of City of Tukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. L10 -032,
recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages 1 through 9, under Recording No. 20101021000765, records of
King County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G;
Thence North 00°11'38" West along the east line of said Parcels G and A, and the west margin of
Andover Park West, a distance of 288.32 feet;
Thence South 89 °46'20" West a distance of 29.76 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
south and having a radius of 125.00 feet;
Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 3'47'32" a distance of 8.27 feet;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 14.75 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to
the south from which the center point bears South 05 °48'17" East a distance of 95.00 feet;
Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27'43'16" a distance of 45.96 feet;
Thence South 33 °53'21" East a distance of 35.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
northeast and having a radius of 8.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 56 °20'23" a distance of 7.87
feet;
Thence North 89 °46'16" East a distance of 18.79 feet;
Thence South 00 °04'14" East a distance of 219.23 feet;
Thence South 00'19'53" East a distance of 163.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
east and having a radius of 8.25 feet;
Thence southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 6.35 feet
to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the north and having a radius of 13.00 feet;
Thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48 °27'27" a distance of 10.99 feet;
Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 23.40 feet to the east line of said Parcel A and west margin of
Andover Park West;
Thence North 00'1198" West along said east line of Parcels A and G and west margin of Andover Park
West, a distance of 167.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Together with that portion of said Parcel A described as follows:
Commencing at northeast corner of said Parcel G;
Thence North 00 °11'38" West along the east lines of said Parcels G and A and said west margin of
Andover Park West, a distance of 317.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement area herein
described;
Thence continuing North 00 °11'38" West along said east line of Parcel A and west margin, a distance of
36.26 feet;
Thence North 89° 10'47" West a distance of 29.17 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
southeast and having a radius of 1.80 feet;
Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 2.78
feet;
Thence South 02 °27'57" West a distance of 17.42 feet;
Thence South 00 0 46'46" West a distance of 17.67 feet;
P:\P09 \09603.13 Final Design \docs \IBl Tukwila Southbound Transit Easement.doc
125
Thence North 89'48'22" East a distance of 32.1.1 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington,
The above described easement areas contain 18,318 square feet, more or less.
P:T09 \09603.13 Final Design\docs %1Bt -Tukwila Southbound Transit .Easement.doc
126
City of Tukwila
Parcel A and G Binding Site Plan 4L10 -032
Tax Parcel No. 9202470010 and 9202470070
Southbound Transit Center Temporary Construction Easement Description
That portion of Parcels A and G of City of Tukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. L10 -032,
recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages 1 through 9, under Recording No. 20101021000765, records of
King County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G;
Thence North 00 °11'38" West along the east line of said Parcels G and A, and the west margin of
Andover Park West, a distance of 288.32 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement herein
described;
Thence South 89 °46'20" West a distance of 29.76 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
south and having a radius of 125.00 feet;
Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 3 °47'32" a distance of 8.27 feet;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East a distance of 14.75 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to
the south from which the center point bears South 05 °48'17" East a distance of 95.00 feet;
Thence westerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 27'43'16" a distance of 45.96 feet;
Thence South 33 °53'21" East a distance of 35.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
northeast and having a radius of 8.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 56 °20'23" a distance of 7.87
feet;
Thence North 8946'16" East a distance of 18.79 feet;
Thence South 00'04'14" East a distance of 219.23 feet;
Thence South 00°19'53" East a distance of 163.62 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
east and having a radius of 8.25 feet;
Thence southerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 6.35 feet
to the beginning of a compound curve concave to the north and having a radius of 13.00 feet;
Thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48 °27'27" a distance of 10.99 feet;
Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 23.40 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00';
South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 23.40 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
northeast and having a radius of 18.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 48 °27'27" a distance of 15.22
feet to the beginning of a compound curve having a radius of 13.25 feet;
Thence northerly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 44 °07'53" a distance of 10.21 feet
Feet;
Thence North 00 19'53" West a distance of 6.27 feet;
Thence South 89 °40'07" West a distance of 4.00 feet;
Thence North 00 °19'53" West a distance of 15.88 feet;
Thence North 89 0 40'07" East a distance of 4.00 feet;
Thence North 00 °19'53" West a distance of 112.51 feet;
Thence South 90 °00'00" West a distance of 13.00 feet;
Thence North 00°16'56" West a distance of 243.16 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave
to the northeast from which the radius point bears North 00 °13'44" West a distance of 13.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 56 °20'23" a distance of 12.78
feet;
PAP09 \09603.13 Final Design \docs\IBI Tukwila Southbound Temp Easement.doc
127
Thence northeasterly along the are of said curve through a central angle of 28 °00'04" a distance of 48.87
feet;
Thence North 00 °11'38" West a distance of 14.60 feet to the beginning of a non tangent curve concave to
the south from which the center point bears South 07 °28'49" East a distance of 130.00 feet;
Thence easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5 °48'36" a distance of 13.18 feet;
Thence North 89 °46'20" East a distance of 29.76 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West;
Thence South 00° 11'38" East,,along said west margin, a distance of 5.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Together with that portion of said Parcel. A described as follows;
Commencing at northeast corner of said Parcel G;
Thence North 00°11'38" West along the cast lines of said Parcels G and A and said west margin of
Andover Park West, a distance of 353.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the easement area herein
described:
Thence North 89'10'47" West a distance of 29.17 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
southeast and having a radius of 1.80 feet;
Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 2.78
feet;
Thence South 02 °27'57" West a distance of 17.42 feet;
Thence South 00 °46'46" West a distance of 17.67 feet;
Thence North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 32.11 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West;
Thence South 00°11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00 feet;
Thence South 89 °48'22" West a distance of 37.1.9 fleet;
Thence North 00 °46'46" East a distance of 22.75 feet;
Thence North 02 °27'57" East a distance of 17.42 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
southeast and having a radius of 6.80 feet;
Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 88 °21'16" a distance of 10.49
feet;
Thence South 89° 10'47" East a distance of 29.08 feet to said west margin of Andover Park West;
Thence South 009 1'38" East along said west margin a distance of 5.00 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington,
Tire above described easement areas contain 6,809 square feet, more or less.
v /a za p
WA zq�
rI
321129
U iL• LAIC?
P :T09 \09601 13 Final Design \does'dBJ Tuhvila Southbound Temp Easement.doc
128
PAGE 1
EXHIBIT MAP
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER EASEMENT
WESTFIELD PARCEL
SEE PAGE 2 FOR CURVE TABLE
TRANSIT EASEMENT
TEMPORARY. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
\W
J
N� �I r:
O N
C M
o o/ 01
W
U tico
A 1
)0' �tpU�v�
Q
30'
WIN
�POB
SOUTHI
P PR r0- L24 AREAA
5.0' TYP.
00
I I 1�(ND
I t r
LJ
oc/1
F- W I I 00
W F
I I Li
I o
o
z
a 1
o `f
L 1-25T
r �(A
N
IL2
N
C7 1W<
PAR f 1-2299
C1 C8,
rPACE
An Engineering Services Company
SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG
PROJ. NO.: 09603.13
1
IW
0
F :Z
30.00` I
I 9
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 f. 425.827.5043
Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey
paceengrs.com
DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW
I�
I I
I
II
t 1
129
LINE TABLE
I
LINE I
BEARING I
LENGTH I
L21
S00'1 1'38 "E 1
14.751
L31
S33'53'21 "E 1
35.871
L41
N89'46'16 "E1
18.79
L71
N00'11'38 "W I
36.26
L81
N89'10'47 "WI
29.17
L91
S02'27'57 "W I
17.42
L101
S00'46'46 "WI
17.671
L121
S89'46'20 "W 1
29.761
L131
N89'48'22 "E1
23.401
L141
N89'48'22 "E1
32.111
L151
N89'46'20 "E 1
29.761
L161
N00'1 1'38 "W
14.60
L171
N33'53'21 "W
40.78
L181
S89 6"W I
13.771
1-191
S89'59'26 "WI
12.01
L201
S00'00'00 "E 1
21.87
L211
N89'59'37 "El
3.661
L221
SO4'20'21 "E 1
63.361
L231
S00'00'34 "W I
53.58
L241
S90'00'00" W 1
13.00
L251
N89'40'07 "EI
4.001
L261
N00'19'53 "WI
15.881
L271
S89'40'07 "WI
4.001
L281
N00'19'53 "WI
6.271
L291
S89'48'22 "W I
23.401
L301
S89 10'47 "E 1
29.081
L311
NO2'27'57 "E1
17.421
L321
S00'46'46 "W 1
22.751
L331
S89'48'22 "W I
37.191
SEE PAGE 2 FOR CURVE TABLE
TRANSIT EASEMENT
TEMPORARY. CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
\W
J
N� �I r:
O N
C M
o o/ 01
W
U tico
A 1
)0' �tpU�v�
Q
30'
WIN
�POB
SOUTHI
P PR r0- L24 AREAA
5.0' TYP.
00
I I 1�(ND
I t r
LJ
oc/1
F- W I I 00
W F
I I Li
I o
o
z
a 1
o `f
L 1-25T
r �(A
N
IL2
N
C7 1W<
PAR f 1-2299
C1 C8,
rPACE
An Engineering Services Company
SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG
PROJ. NO.: 09603.13
1
IW
0
F :Z
30.00` I
I 9
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 f. 425.827.5043
Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey
paceengrs.com
DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW
I�
I I
I
II
t 1
129
EXHIBIT MAP
TUKWILA TRANSIT CENTER EASEMENT
WESTFIELD PARCEL
1
CURVE TABLE
CURVE I
LENGTH I RADIUS I
C31
45.961
95.001
1 C41
7.871
8.001
I C71
6.351
8.251
C81
10.99
13.001
C111
2.78
1.801
C141
8.271
125.001
C151
13.181
130.001
C161
48.871
100.001
C171
12.781
13.001
C181
10.211
13.251
C19
15.221
18.001
C20
10.491
6.801
LEGEND:
DELTA
27'43'16"
56'20'23"
44'07' 53"
48'27'27"
88'21'16"
3'47'32 "1
5'48'36 "1
28'00'04"
56'20'23"
44'07'53"
48'27'27"
88'21'16"
HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF TUKWILA
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO. L10 -032
NEW TRANSIT EASEMENT HATCHED AREAS
BSIP PARCEL LINES
CENTERLINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
S -J
J
C15
T-
J
N'
NORTHI
AREA BAKER
BL VD.
30.00'
.L4
j J 30.00
N
o i
N CC
FT
CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 I f. 425.827.5043
a nl Surve
Civil (Structural I PI n ng I y
An Engineering Services Company paceengrs.com
SCALE: 1" 50' FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG DATE: 11/15/11 BY: FW
PROJ. NO.:09603.13
PAGE 2
I I
30.00'
-LD
I
T O cz ��L7
130
EXHIBIT C
City of'Fukwila
Parcels A and G Binding Site flan #1,10 -032
Tax Parcel No.'s 9202470010 and 9202470070
Canopy Easement Description
"That portion of Parcels A and G of City of'Fukwila Binding Site Improvement Plan No. I.,10 -032
recorded in volume 256 of Plats, Pages I through 9, under Recording No. 20101021000765, records of
King County, Washington, described as follows;
Commencing at the northeast corner of said Parcel G;
Thence South 00 °11'38" East along the east line thereof and the west margin of Andover Park West a.
distance of 42.73 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing South 00 °11'38" East along said west margin a distance of 68.17 .feet;
Thence North 89 °54'34" West a distance of 62.85 feet;
Thence North 00 °1.9'59" East a distance of 68.15 feet;
Thence South 89 °56'07" East a distance of 62.27 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of Icing, State of Washington,
The above described easement areas contain 4,264 square feet, more or less.
20
3242:
PAP09 Final Designldocs, 1131 Tuhvila Canopy Easement2.doc
131
EXHIBIT MAP
FIRESTONE CANOPY EASEMENT
PARCEL G BSIP L10 -032
I
NE COR.
PARCEL G
i
n
I N
CANOPY II
N89'56'07 "W 62.27'
T
POB
F- cc �w�
w w i j
a ,Q A 0 56'31"
45.00'
O,y -2.31'
N89'54'34 "W 62.85'
I
PARCEL G
WEA SOUTHCENTER
I 30 00'
I
r
N
W
Co
0
0
0
LLC BSIP 30. �o'
�VOL 24977 -84
I
PARC A
LEGEND:
HORIZONTAL DATUM CITY OF TUKWILA
BINDING SITE IMPROVEMENT PLAN NO.
L10 -032
NEW CANOPY EASEMENT HATCHED AREA
W
Ot
O
Q
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
BSIP PARCEL LINES
CENTERLINE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
SCALE: 1" 30' PA
DATE: 11/15/11
BY: FW An Engineering Services Company
PROJ. NO.: 09603.13
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
p. 425.827.2014 I f. 425.827.5043
Civil I Structural I Planning I Survey
paceengrs.com
132
EXHIBIT D
City of Tukwila
Tax Parcel No. 0223100075
Temporary Construction Easement Description
That portion of Tract 7, Andover Industrial Park No. 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume
71 of Plats, Page 68, in King County, Washington, lying north of a line drawn parallel with the south line
of Baker Boulevard, and 459 feet south thereof, and more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the southwest corner of said parcel;
Thence North 00° 1.1'38" West, along the west line of said parcel and east margin of Andover Parr. West, a
distance of 396.59 feet;
Thence North 89 0 48 1 22" East, at right angles to said east margin, a distance of 10.00 feet to the east line
of an existing 10.00 wide easement as shown on said plat, and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the
easement herein described;
Thence continuing North 89 °48'22" East a distance of 5.00 feet;
Thence North 00 0 1138" West, parallel with said margin, a distance of 12.69 feet to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave to the southeast and leaving a radius of 35.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90 °29'07" a distance of 55.27
feet;
Thence South 89 °42'31" East, parallel with the south margin of said Baker Street, a distance of 106.48
feet;
Thence North 00 °17'29" East, at right angle to the south line of said Baker Street, a distance of 5.00 feet
to the south line of said existing easement;
Thence along said easement line, and parallel with said south and eastrnargins, through the following
courses:
North 89 °42'31" West a distance of 106.48 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the
southeast and having a radius of 40.00 feet;
Thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90 °29'07" a distance of 63.17
feet;
Thence South 00'113 8" East a distance of 12.69 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Situate in the City of Tukwila, County of King, State of Washington,
The above described easement areas contain 891 square feet, more or less.
PAPOM9603,13 Final Design \does \1131 Tukwila Temporary Construction Es_nt.doc
133
EXHIBIT MAP
TUKWILA TRANSIT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
SCALE: 1" 50'
FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG
DATE: 11/11/11 BY: FW
PROJ. NO.: 09603.13
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
PACE p. 425.827.2014 (f. 425.827 5043
Civil Structural Planning Survey
An Engineering Services Company paceengrS.com
134
o
BAKER
S89'42'31 "E
BL VD.
V�
'g
o= so•29*07"
40.00' o
30.00'
63.17' r7
i
106.48'
L�\� Q���\��
T•—
106.48' 1
NOV 7'2
�A =90'29 07'
I I 0 0
5.00'
POB a
R--
35.00'
L=55.27'
Sri
12 X
PARCEL 0223100075
5
-I 30.00'
t
N89 48'22"E
9 �'O
p
�00'
A q�
"E
fY
5
N89'48'22
10.00'
OD
EXISTING
�z
EASEMENT
IM
I
PER PLAT
Q
I
CAR LOT
SW CORNER
PARCEL
SCALE: 1" 50'
FILE: \EASEMENT EXHIBIT.DWG
DATE: 11/11/11 BY: FW
PROJ. NO.: 09603.13
11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300
Kirkland, WA 98033
PACE p. 425.827.2014 (f. 425.827 5043
Civil Structural Planning Survey
An Engineering Services Company paceengrS.com
134
City of Tukwila
Jim Haggerton, Mayor
INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor Haggerton
Transportation Committee
FROM: Bob Giberson, Public Works Director
DATE: November 18, 2011
SUBJECT: Tukwila Urban Center Access (Klickitat) Proiect
Project No. 98410419
ROW Transfer between Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and Tukwila
ISSUE
Conveyance of Right -of -Way (ROW) to WSDOT and subsequent acceptance of ROW Turnback to Tukwila.
BACKGROUND
In April 2010, a Letter of Understanding (LOU) was signed by both Tukwila and WSDOT, which outlined the process of
how both agencies were intending to transfer ROW ownership and adjust the limited access lines along Southcenter
Parkway for the Klickitat Project. There are three components related to the LOU:
1) Tukwila is to convey a portion of the ROW dedicated by Westfield to WSDOT.
2) WSDOT will relocate the limited access lines from their current location to include the ROW conveyed by Tukwila.
3) WSDOT will then convey back to Tukwila all of the underlying ROW.
Southcenter Parkway will then be under the City of Tukwila's ROW for maintenance responsibilities.
DISCUSSION
The ROW dedication was conveyed to Tukwila from Westfield in June 2009 using one of the City's standard processes,
a Right -of -Way Dedication. It was our understanding that a Warranty Deed would convey the ROW to WSDOT. WSDOT
is unwilling to accept a Warranty Deed from the City as conveyance for the Westfield dedication since it was conveyed to
Tukwila through a Right -of -Way Dedication. Instead, WSDOT is requesting that the City execute a Quit Claim Deed to
convey the property. Staff and the City Attorney have been negotiating with WSDOT on the manner to best achieve this
property transfer. WSDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have indicated concurrence with this
approach.
The first step is to convey the necessary ROW to WSDOT using a Quit Claim Deed, including an after acquired title
clause. Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the Quit Claim Deed. The City Attorney will be requesting
Westfield to re- convey their ROW dedication using a Quit Claim Deed. It is this step that necessitates the after acquired
title clause.
In the second step, WSDOT will adjust the limited access line to include the property conveyed to WSDOT by Tukwila.
After this adjustment is executed, WSDOT will convey the entire ROW width on Southcenter Pkwy back to Tukwila. The
Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to accept the ROW Turnback Agreement (as part of step 3).
RECOMMENDATION
Council is being asked to authorize the Mayor to sign the Quit Claim Deed to convey the ROW to WSDOT and also
authorize the Mayor to accept the ROW Turnback Agreement from WSDOT and consider this item at the November 28,
2011 Committee of the Whole and subsequent December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting.
Attachments: Letter of Understanding dated April 5, 2010
Quit Claim Deed with After Acquired Title Clause from Tukwila to WSDOT
Turnback Agreement from WSDOT to Tukwila
W: \PW Eng \PROJECTS\A- RW RS Projects \98410419 TUC Access (Klickitat) \INFORMATION MEMO -ROW Transfer 11- 15- 11.docx
135
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevard a Tubvila, lashington 98188 Jiri Ha op, Mayor
April 5, 2010
Russell S. East, P.E.
Assistant Regional Administrator for SnoKing
Washington State Department of Transportation
15700 Dayton Ave N, N1382- 101
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133 -9710
RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project
Letter of Understanding
Dear Mr. East:
Negotiations between the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and the City of
Tukwila (CITY) around the Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project (PROJECT) have been
ongoing since 2005. Those discussions have resulted in this Letter of Understanding (LOU).
It is agreed by all parties that the following conditions, obligations, and requirements shall apply, and
that each party is bound by the following:
Issue
The CITY has taken lead on a roadway design project predominately along Southcenter Parkway.
While a portion of the PROJECT falls under Limited Access control, the larger corridor functions as a
CITY street. The CITY has acquired all necessary right -of -way (ROW) for the PROJECT; all new
ROW is currently under CITY ownership. The CITY has been coordinating with WSDOT for the
PROJECT design and is working toward finalization of the design and advertising the PROJECT for
construction. The CITY has acquired the funding for the PROJECT design and construction from
multiple sources including CITY funds, federal and local grants, and private funds. No WSDOT funds
have been committed to the PROJECT. Several of the grants awarded to the PROJECT are time
sensitive and could be revoked by the granting agency should the PROJECT be unreasonably delayed.
It is in the best interest of both the CITY and WSDOT to work cooperatively to complete the
PROJECT as it is mutually beneficial to both agencies.
WSDOT Responsibilities
1. WSDOT will work with the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) to gain approval of the
Limited Access deviation.
2. WSDOT agrees to accept conveyance of ROW from the CITY for the por% Pceessidelineation center
Parkway which is currently CITY-owned ROW (see attached ROW Exhibit) of the
ROW conveyance and Certification, WSDOT agrees to relocate the Limited
136
Letter of Understanding
Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Limited Access
March 31, 2010
Page 2 of 2
to the easterly side of the Southcenter Parkway ROW. The CITY and WSDOT agree there is
no meaningful benefit at this time as part of this project to extending the Limited Access
control further north or south than the existing north/south boundaries along Southcenter
Parkway.
3. Upon PROJECT close -out, as defined by the CITY's acceptance and close -out of the
PROJECT, WSDOT agrees to turn -back a1O ownership of Southcenter Parkway to the
CITY through a Turn -Back Agreement al��c�nc Row PW6;+ :PJ
4. WSDOT agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any
exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved
through the PROJECT.
5. WSDOT agrees to continue working with the CITY on all remaining design issues, to be
detailed in a separate Letter of Understanding.
CITY Responsibilities
1. The CITY will submit documentation for the deviation of standard Limited Access
requirements for WSDOT and FHWA approval.
2. The CITY will convey to WSDOT that portion of the ROW which will be incorporated into the
revised Limited Access area as described above. The CITY will submit appropriate
documentation for the conveyance of ROW and the revision to the Limited Access area as part
of the normal ROW Certification process for the PROJECT.
3. The CITY agrees to continue all normal maintenance activities within the PROJECT area,
exclusive of the interstate facilities, through PROJECT close -out.
4. The CITY agrees to accept the ROW turn -back from WSDOT at PROJECT close -out.
5. The CITY agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any
exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved
through the PROJECT.
6. The CITY agrees to continue finalizing the project designto incorporate the remaining design
issues verbally agreed upon, the details of which will be documented in a separate Letter of
Understanding.
By signing the spaced provided below, the CITY and WSDOT acknowledge and agree to the terms and
commitments outlined above.
Concurrence by:
Bob Giberson, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Tukwila
Date: 4cx1 1 2 C) l O
Concurrence by:
Russell S. East, P.E.
Assistant Regional Administrator SnoKing
WSDOT
Date: 4 -5
137
7 'r
Q
NS
_A 23
to a
a"
;Ii 1 �W �OJAC0
t
a' 1 i i t 1 j
iii t
1 I 1
N
r;
i 1 itl f I .Y
t
t o I,:1's ►f I ii aN
O --Yr- -rte_" �n- l_�__�__._1.-- :Y I
N
:ii it 1 ;1
t
c�
i t'o•1
wov
z1 j 1
s+
iil� f t
I i gl i
N
t"
8�
r 4
H
0
s i t
Q
t il l F"
AFTER RECORDING, PLEASE RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
QUIT CLAIM DEED
Grantor: City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation
Grantee: State of Washington, Department of Transportation
Document Reference Number(s): N/A
Section/Township/Range: SEC. 26, T 23 N, R 4 E W.M.
Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s):
Property Legal Description (abbreviated): Ptn. of NE '/4 of NW 1 /4 of Sec. 26; and Ptn. of SE
1 /4 of SW 1 /4 of Sec. 23, Twp. 23 N, R4 E W.M.
Additional Legal: Attached hereto as Exhibit A
The GRANTOR, City of Tukwila, a Washington municipal corporation, for and in
consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO /100 ($10.00) DOLLARS, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the
parties, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the State of Washington, acting by and through
its Department of Transportation, Grantee, the real property situated in King County, State
of Washington and legally described in Exhibit "A" and shown in "Exhibits B -1 and B -2,"
herewith attached and made a part hereof, and any after acquired interest therein.
It is understood and agreed that delivery of this deed is hereby tendered and that the
terms and obligations hereof shall not become binding upon the State of Washington unless
and until accepted and approved hereon in writing for the State of Washington, by and
through its Department of Transportation, by its authorized agent.
Page 1 of 5
140
DATED this day of 2011.
GRANTOR: CITY OF TUKWILA
Mayor
Attest /Authenticated:
City Clerk
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of King
Approved as to Form by:
City Attorney
On this day of 2011, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally
appeared Jim Haggerton, known to me to be the Mayor of CITY OF TUKWILA, the
municipal corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged it to be the
free and voluntary act of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes mentioned in
this instrument, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year above written.
NAME:
(Print Name)
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My Commission Expires:
[THIS PART INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Page 2 of 5
141
DATED this day of 2011.
GRANTEE: STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSORTATION
Accepted and Approved
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Department of Transportation
IM
Real Estate Services Program Administrator
Page 3 of 5
142
Exhibit A
That portion of the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of
Section 26, Township 23 North, Range 4 East, W.M., in King
County, Washington, and of the southeast quarter of the
southwest quarter of Section 23, Township 23 North, Range 4
East, W.M., in King County, Washington, and of the Interurban
Addition to Seattle, according to the plat thereof recorded in
Volume 10 of Plats, page 55, in King County, Washington, and
in Brookvale Garden Tracts, according to the plat thereof
recorded in Volume 10 of Plats, page 47, in King County,
Washington, and of the W.H. Gilliam Donation Land Claim No.
40, lying between the existing limited access line of State Route
5 and the following described line:
Commencing at the intersection of Southcenter Parkway and
Strander Boulevard (S 164 Street) monumented with a 2 inch
brass cap in a monument case; thence along the monumented
centerline of Strander Boulevard South 88 °08'47 "East 431.28
feet;
Thence North 01'51' 13" East 30.00 feet to a point on the
northerly right of way margin of Strander Boulevard;
Thence North 81 °07'29" West 76.22 feet;
Thence North 86 °28'41" West 108.58 feet;
Thence North 88 °10'49" West 135.10 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the right with a radius 35.31 feet;
Thence following said curve in a northerly direction through a
central angle of 88 °28'02" 54.52 feet;
Thence North 009 7' 13" East 181.98 feet;
Thence North 89 °42'47" West 38.84 feet, to the intersection
with the existing limited access line of SR 5, said intersection
being at Highway Engineer's Station Lw 2525 +08.60 and
455.08 feet right, on the Lw line survey shown on plan sheet 18
of 26 of SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic., approved September
16, 2005, said intersection also being the point of beginning;
Thence South 89 °42'47" East 38.84 feet, to the east line of
Southcenter Parkway as dedicated by deed recorded under
recording number 20090720001730 in King County Records;
Thence along said deed line the following courses, North
00'17'13" East 141.51 feet;
Thence North 02 °55'32" East 67.60 feet;
Thence North 00 °06'34" West 177.97 feet;
Thence North 02 °24'31" West 177.98 feet;
Thence North 02 °42'27" West 130.20 feet;
Page 4 of 5
143
Thence North 01'00'12" West 130.19 feet;
Thence North 26 °33'54" East 42.44 feet;
Thence North 87 °10'22" East 4.06 feet;
Thence North 01 '19'12" East 61.64 feet;
Thence North 859 9' 10" West 3.43 feet;
Thence North 43 °05'40" West 17.49 feet to the beginning of a
curve to the right with a radius of 19.10 feet;
Thence following said curve in a northerly direction through a
central angle of 45 °26'46" 15.15 feet;
Thence North 02 °21'06" East 72.93 feet;
Thence leaving said deed line, North 87 °38'54 "West 13.40 feet,
to an angle point in the existing limited access line of SR 5, said
angle point being at Highway Engineer's Station Lw
2535 +53.16 and 515.05 feet right, on the Lw line survey shown
on plan sheet 20 of 26 of SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic.,
approved September 16, 2005, said point also being the
terminus;
Also, the Grantor herein conveys and grants to the State of
Washington all rights of ingress and egress (including all existing,
future or potential easement of access, light, view and air) to, from
and between SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic. and the remainder of
said Property legally described in Exhibit C.
The lands herein described, the specific details concerning all of
which are to be found on sheets 18 and 20 of that certain plan
entitled SR 405, SR 5 Interchange Vic., now of record and on file
in the office of the Secretary of Transportation at Olympia, and
bearing date of approval September 16, 2005, and as revised.
Page 5 of 5
144
EXHIBIT B MAP
N89'03'25"W 17.04'
x-N89'03'25"W 46 24'
42.04'
WESTFIELD
CORPORATION
N84'16'41"E 10.03'
INC,
1446*53'19'E
22,78'
L--44'32'13
R=32.40' TL# 115720-0290
L=25.18' 100 50
0 100
I SCALE
IN FEET
6
O
DEDICATED
l RIGHT-OF-WAY
2 2 23
IIIIIINK,
27126
N87*38 02 W 13.45' IL# 262304-9023
NO2*21'06 E 72.74
f,
A--45'26'46"
N2'12*46"E 17717' I Q zn I R=19.10'
L=15.15'
TO SECTION LINE
WESTFIELD
CORPORATION
N43'05'40"W 17,49'
INC,
N85*19'10"W 3.43'
z
7 j
cv,
lal z 0-
o 'NOI'19'12"E 61.64'
N87*10'22"E 4.06'
N26*33*54*E 42 44'
x -N0l*00'12"W 130.19'
no
w z NEW DEDICATED
LIMITED ACCESS AREA
SEE SHEET 1
(P Ei
FILENAME: LIMITED ACCESS.DWG
CITY OF TUKWIIA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
SOUTHCENTER PARKWAY
LIMITED ACCESS DEDICATION EXHIBIT
SCALE: 1"=100' JOB# 05725.13
DATE: 04/02/10 I SHEET 2 OF 2
145
EXHIBIT B MAP
SEE SHEET 2
J TL# 537920 -0240
�a NO2'42'27 'W 130.20' 4
a
Q WESTFIELD
a- CORPORATION
w
tL'
T- f INC.
W i7 n;
z NO2'24'31 "W 177,98'
1
0 w
(n Z
NEW DEDICATED
LIMITED ACCESS AREA
N00'06'34 "W 177.97'
N�
O.
N; NO2'55'32 "E 67.60'
N N
AR LINE
Tl# 537920 -0241
p
N00'1 7'13 "E
TPOB 139.58' WESTFIELD
CORPORATION
r
j S89'09'07 'E 38.91'
S89'09'07 "E
o a 40.00' w
Z
w I
I DEDICATED
X -i N z RIGHT -OF -WAY
Li -i w
^,w 100 50 0 100
uu�uw��
Z SCALE IN FEET
0
_STRANDER BLVD
1
I .36' 42.5 MONUMENT i 1_
CITY OF TUKWH A
(iMCE ]PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
D SOUTHGENER PARKWAY
LIMITED ACCESS DEDICATION EXHIBIT
an GM jneaiie 9ervkes Canperti
SCALE: 1" =100' I JOB# 05725.13
FILENAME: LIMITED ACCESS.DWG I DATE: 04/02/10 SHEET 1 OF 2
146
Adw
Washington State
Department of Transportation
TURNBACK AGREEMENT
Agreement Number: TB 1 -0215
State Route Control Section Region
SR 405 1743 NWR
Organization and Address:
City of Tukwila
6200 Southcenter Blvd.
Tukwila, WA 98188
Section/Location:
SR 405
SR 5 Interchange Vicinity
Tukwila Urban Access Improvement
This Agreement is between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation,
hereinafter the "STATE," and the CITY OF TUKWILA, hereinafter the "CITY," collectively
hereinafter the "PARTIES."
WHEREAS, the CITY, proposed to design and construct the Tukwila Urban Access
Improvement Project, hereinafter referred to as the "PROJECT and
WHEREAS, a portion of the PROJECT on Southcenter Parkway falls within the STATE
owned limited access right -of -way, and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree the PROJECT is mutually beneficial to both, and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES entered into a Letter of Understanding last dated April 15, 2010,
as attached hereto in full as Exhibit B, and made a part hereof, to establish the conditions,
obligations, and requirements of each PARTIES responsibilities to complete the PROJECT,
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Letter of Understanding, the reconstructed state route and
city street, hereinafter referred to as the "Roadway Facilities shown on Exhibit A, attached
hereto and made part hereof, will be transferred from the STATE to the CITY, and
WHEREAS, the STATE and CITY enter into this Agreement to identify the process of
Roadway Facilities and right -of -way operation, maintenance, and ownership transfer,
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to RCW 47.52.210,
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. TRANSFER OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
Page 1 of 3
147
1.1 The CITY agrees upon execution of this Agreement, to accept the responsibility for
the maintenance and operation of the Roadway Facilities and right -of -way, as shown on
Exhibit A until such time as the full ownership of the right -of -way and Roadway Facilities are
conveyed by deed pursuant to Section 2.
1.2 The CITY agrees to accept ownership of the right of way and Roadway Facilities as
shaded, on Exhibit A, as follows:
Blue (light) Indicates Roadway Facilities and right -of -way to be conveyed in fee to
the CITY. Except the STATE retains access control and access rights
in the areas denoted in in red.
2. RECORDED CONVEYANCE
2.1 Within thirty (30) calendar days following the STATE's written transfer to the CITY
of the responsibility for maintenance and operations as provided in Section 1, the STATE will
furnish the CITY a recordable conveyance of right -of -way, including the Roadway Facilities
constructed thereon, as shown on the plans marked Exhibit A. The conveyance will be
recorded pursuant to RCW 65.08.095.
2.2 It is understood and agreed that the above referenced property is transferred for
road/street purposes only, and no other use shall be made of said property without the prior
written approval of the STATE. It is also understood and agreed that the CITY, its successors
or assigns, shall not revise either the right -of -way lines or the access control without prior
written approval from the STATE, its successors, or assigns. Revenues resulting from any
vacation, sale, or rental of this property or any portion thereof, shall (1) if the property is
disposed of to a governmental entity for public use, be placed in the CITY road/street fund
and used exclusively for road/street purposes; or (2) if the property is disposed of other than
as provided in (1) above, be shared by the CITY and STATE, their successors or assigns, in
the same proportion as acquisition costs were shared; except that the CITY may deduct the
documented direct costs of any such vacation, sale, or rental.
2.3 The CITY agrees to comply with, and require its successors or assigns to comply with,
all civil rights and anti discrimination requirements of chapter 49.60 RCW, as to the right -of-
way and Roadway Facilities to be conveyed.
2.4 The CITY understands and agrees that the STATE is retaining ownership of all rights
of ingress and egress, to, from and between the above referenced state highway route and/or
Roadway Facilities and the properties abutting said state highway route and/or Roadway
Facilities, including all rights of access, light, view and air, and access control as shown by
the access prohibition symbol along the above referenced state route and/or Roadway
Facilities right -of -way and along abutting properties on the right -of -way access plans marked
as Exhibit A. The CITY, its successors or assigns, shall have no right of ingress or egress
between the above referenced state route and abutting properties, or the state route and the
lands herein conveyed that show the access prohibition symbol. The CITY, its successors or
Page 2 of 3
148
assigns, shall not be entitled to compensation for any loss of access, light, view, or air
occasioned by the location, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, or operation of the
above referenced state route and/or Roadway Facilities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have executed this Agreement on the day
and year first above written.
CITY STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By: By:
Print name: Print name:
Date: Date:
Approval as to Form Approval as to Form
City Attorney Assistant Attorney General
Date: Date:
Page 3 of 3
149
0
c�
s
Q
d
u
ez
�R
Fir-
jai re's
s m its" spa off,
y5 she
gp.1tit ny
N
3
e
N
W
4•
rro
1
JY
E
L
66
E
.�T
a 3
4k
3;
Z
Y t a
W
ta
I
5�
W
d s<
�s
204
N
0
T
L
N
r Q
9 ,5
150
f
M Y
N t r
r t
f
1
�a•ILZ n� p,,,.
4i •pN [ran
J� J
kr 31TN'
N
W
4•
rro
1
JY
E
L
66
E
.�T
a 3
4k
3;
Z
Y t a
W
ta
I
5�
W
d s<
�s
204
N
0
T
L
N
r Q
9 ,5
150
f
M Y
N
W
4•
rro
1
JY
E
L
66
E
.�T
a 3
4k
3;
Z
Y t a
W
ta
I
5�
W
d s<
�s
204
N
0
T
L
N
r Q
9 ,5
150
54
l
2
Q
ya•trsz r,.,
N
Q
s
o L./
A M
l V
E
Y
i
k :R
E
,r
N
i
ff
oa. ust .t
C
N
GG S rn
a
G
i
a.w
N
S r Y r
ri+r
p
`4 M.w
'w ry
i
f
i 'fir
f
i
.2 N
iL
Y�
r
f
r
8
x
T ti�
.�s
195
1<;z
-.JSJa
4
U
151
if
a
G
i
a.w
N
S r Y r
ri+r
p
`4 M.w
'w ry
i
f
i 'fir
f
i
.2 N
iL
Y�
r
f
r
8
x
T ti�
.�s
195
1<;z
-.JSJa
4
U
151
et .�r(5 335 �ni� n7taR
a
G
i
a.w
N
S r Y r
ri+r
p
`4 M.w
'w ry
i
f
i 'fir
f
i
.2 N
iL
Y�
r
f
r
8
x
T ti�
.�s
195
1<;z
-.JSJa
4
U
151
ila
6200 Southeenter° Boulevard Tuk iia, Washington 48188
April 20, 2010
Ramin Pazooki, Manager
WSDOT NWR SnoKing Development Services
PO Box 330310
15700 Dayton Avenue N
Seattle, Washington 98133 -9710
RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project
Letter of Understanding #1
Dear Mr. Pazooki:
Enclosed you will find two copies of the Letter of Understanding between the City of Tukwila
and WSDOT which have been initialed by Bob Giberson, Public Works Director. The City has
accepted your changes to the original letter. However, on the advice of the City Attorney's
office, we have amended Attachments A and B to include the language "For Illustrative Purposes
Only." Additionally, the original Exhibit A, which was the full legal description and drawing of
the area to be conveyed to WSDOT, has been removed to eliminate confusion between the two
Exhibit As. Please initial the change made on the two new exhibits and return one copy back to
me at:
Cyndy Knighton
Senior Transportation Engineer
City of Tukwila
5300 Southcenter Blvd, Suite 100
Tukwila, Washington 98188
Thank you for your continued cooperation on getting this project through the necessary reviews
and approvals.
Sincerely,
Cynd r Krug lit n
Senior Transportation Engineer
Encl.: Letter of Understanding (2 originals)
i
Exhibit B sheet I of
I
152
City of Tiukwila
6200 Southcenter Boulevarde Tukwila, Washington 9818E Jim Ba Egerton, Mayor
April 5, 2010
Russell S. East, P.E.
Assistant Regional Administrator for SnoKing
Washington State Department of Transportation
15700 Dayton Ave N, NB82 -101
PO Box 330310
Seattle, WA 98133 -9710
RE: Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project
Letter of Understanding
Dear Mr. East:
Negotiations between the Washington State Department of Transportation WSDOT) and the City of
Tukwila (CITY) around the Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project (PROJECT) have been
ongoing since 2005. Those discussions have resulted in this Letter of Understanding (LOU).
It is agreed by all parties that the following conditions, obligations, and requirements shall apply, and
that each party is bound by the following:
Issue
The CITY has taken lead on a roadway design project predominately along Southcenter Parkway.
While a portion of the PROJECT falls under Limited Access control, the larger corridor functions as a
CITY street. The CITY has acquired all necessary right -of -way (ROW) for the PROJECT, all new
ROW is currently under CITY ownership. The CITY has been coordinating with WSDOT for the
PROJECT design and is working toward finalization of the design and advertising the PROJECT for
The CITY has for PROJECT design
rn
construction. acquired the funding the and construction from
�c
multiple sources including CITY funds, federal and local grants, and private funds. No WSDOT funa
have been committed to the PROJECT; Several of the grants awarded to the PROJECT are time
6
sensitive and could be revoked by the granting agency should the PROJECT be unreasonably delayed
to
It is in the best interest of both the CITY and WSDOT to work cooperatively to complete the
PROJECT as it is mutually beneficial to both agencies.
tD
WSDOT Resnonsibilities
N
1. WSDOT will work with the Federal Highways Administration (FHWA) to gain approval of the
O
Limited Access deviation.
2. WSDOT agrees to accept conveyance of ROW from the CITY for the porti�n hcenter
Parkway which is currently CITY-owned ROW (see attached ROW Exhibit). of the
ROW conveyance and Certification, WSDOT agrees to relocate the Limited c ess delineatio:
WAPW Eng101d P drivelCyndy\Kliekitat\Letter of Understanding WSDOT Tukwila 4- 5- 10.doc
153
Letter of Understanding
Tukwila Urban Access Improvement Project Limited Access and ROW
March 31, 2010
Page 2 of 2
to the easterly side of the Southcenter Parkway ROW. The CITY and WSDOT agree there is
no meaningful benefit at this time as part of this project to extending the Limited Access
control further north or south than the existing north/south boundaries along Southcenter
Parkway.
3. Upon PROJECT close -out, as defined by the CITY's acceptance and close -out of the
PROJECT, WSDOT agrees to turn -back al O ownership of Southcenter Parkway to he
CITY through a Turn -Back Agreement. �V4 i
4. WSDOT agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any
exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved
through the PROJECT.
5. WSDOT agrees to continue working with the CITY on all remaining design issues, to be
detailed in a separate Letter of Understanding.
CITY Responsibilities
1. The CITY will submit documentation for the deviation of standard Limited Access
requirements for WSDOT and FHWA approval.
2. The CITY will convey to WSDOT that portion of the ROW which will be incorporated into the
revised Limited Access area as described above. The CITY will subunit appropriate
documentation for the conveyance of ROW and the revision to the Limited Access area as part
of the normal ROW Certification process for the PROJECT.
3. The CITY agrees to continue all normal maintenance activities within the PROJECT area,
exclusive of the interstate facilities, through PROJECT close -out.
4. The CITY agrees to accept the ROW turn -back from WSDOT at PROJECT close -out.
5. The CITY agrees that all transactions agreed upon as part of this LOU is done so without any
exchange of cash or any other item of tangible value, other than the mutual benefits achieved
through the PROJECT.
6. The CITY agrees to continue finalizing the project design to incorporate the remaining design
issues verbally agreed upon, the details of which will be documented in a separate Letter of
Understanding.
By signing the spaced provided below, the CITY and WSDOT acknowledge and agree to the terms at
commitments outlined above.
Concurrence by:
fi
Bob Giberson, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Tukwila
Date: 6 -0'l0
Concurrence by:
Russell S. East, P.E.
Assistant Regional Administrator SnoKing
WSDOT
Date: L IJ 1
1
:s
154
ly
t
r
r f
t t
rr f p
f r r f l f
\,W j 1 f
f r •d' r
a
f
1
r
y
i:f N N
N N
N Z6
A
9
It.
if
Q
q
U
ham. C b
W
7
F-
Q
H
J
J
155
it t •I} i i
=t
it
Pu
Ul
(Ali at
C L
f
1
F'
&11b
SOUTH COUNTY AREA TRANSPORTATION BOARD (SCATBd)
October 18, 2011
Members
Councilmember Wayne Snoey
Mayor Dave Hill
Councilmember Ralph Shape
Carolyn Robertson
MEETING SUMMARY
Councilmember Joan Hernandez
Chris Arkills
Councilmember Marcie Palmer
Councilmember Jeanne Burbidge
Grant Fredricks
Councilmember Les Thomas
Stacy Trussler
Geri Poor
Mayor Bart Taylor
Steve Roemer
Emiko Atherton
City of Covington (Chair)
City of Algona (Vice Chair)
City of SeaTac
City of Auburn (Alternate)
City of Tukwila
King County Executive (Alternate)
City of Renton
City of Federal Way
City of Des Moines (Alternate)
City of Kent
WSDOT
Port of Seattle (Alternate)
City of Milton
City of Burien (Alternate)
King County Council (Alternate)
I. Introduction, Comments, September 20 Meeting Summary
After introductions Chair Snoey recognized Karen Goroski from the Suburban Cities
Association and noted that this would be Karen's last meeting because she will be soon
retiring. He thanked her for doing a wonderful job with the Suburban Cities Association
and said that they would all miss her. Ms. Goroski thanked the Board, adding that she
had learned a lot from the Boardmembers and from staff.
The September 20 SCATBd meeting summary was adopted by the Board.
II. Connecting Washington Task Force Update Seattle City Councilman Tom
Rasmussen
Because of meeting conflicts Chair Snoey switched the agenda items and asked Seattle
Councilmember Tom Rasmussen to update the Board as a member of Governor
Gregoire's Connecting Washington Task Force. Chair Snoey said he was pleased to see
the Task Force talking about the preservation and maintenance issues and noted that there
needs to be a regional conversation and approach on this issue when the Task Force
reports back to the Legislature next year.
Mr. Rasmussen began the discussion by saying that he believed he brought a regional
perspective to the Task Force discussion because of this role as Chair of Seattle's
transportation committee and the various other transportation committees that he has
served on in the past. He said the challenge for the Task Force is how to provide
157
SCATBd Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2011
Page 2
mobility for all the people who live in our various communities. He acknowledged the
different needs of the people who lived in our rural communities and those who lived in
the urban areas and said we have to find a better way to fund transit and transportation
needs throughout the region. Mr. Rasmussen said the Governor asked the Task Force to
focus on jobs and the economy; he said the challenge to the Task Force is how to craft
transportation policies that will help improve our State's economy and get people to and
from work.
Mr. Rasmussen noted that the SR 167 and SR 509 corridors were listed as priority
corridors in Task Force issue papers. He also noted that there were lots of comments
from stakeholders in the State's ferry system. He said Seattle welcomes commuters from
Kitsap County, but noted the reality of driving on congested Seattle streets, and said there
needs to be strong advocacy for transit and street car solutions in Seattle. He also wanted
eastern Washington farmers to be able to get their crops to the ports and was concerned
about the condition of the "last mile" to the ports. Mr. Rasmussen said that if trucks are
continuously stuck in local commuter traffic, they will go elsewhere to move their
products out of the state
Mr. Rasmussen asked the Board if there were any messages that he could bring back to
the Task Force. Councilmember Les Thomas noted that the City of Kent built the 228
Street Corridor with plans to connect with the SR 509 extension. He said one message
Mr. Rasmussen could bring back is to complete missing link projects. A competed SR
509/228 Street corridor would bring a lot of freight traffic into the Kent Valley area and
would reduce freight traffic on I -5.
Chair Snoey also noted there was a missing link issue with the SR 167 corridor and the
need to complete the connection to the Port of Tacoma. Mayor Hill cautioned about
delivering more traffic to SR 167 while there still was a choke point between the Sumner
area and Auburn area on SR 167. Councilmember Burbidge also mentioned the Triangle
project at 1 -5 and SR 516, and the need to fund the remaining phases on the project. The
Triangle projects would bring benefits to commuter and freight traffic as well as safety
benefits. Councilmember Burbidge also talked about the need to complete the light rail to
South 272nd Street. Councilmember Ralph Shape noted that SeaTac supported light rail
into the South County area and its eventual link to the Tacoma light rail system.
Wayne Snoey noted that freight mobility is important to the region and said the public
needs to be educated on the role it plays in our region's economy. Mr. Rasmussen said
that one way to take pressure off from existing roads is to use transit and light rail.
Getting more commuter traffic off the roads will allow freer movement of freight traffic
on existing arterials. Chair Snoey discussed the need to improve the Stampede Pass line
and the need to crown the tunnel to allow double stacked trains. Carolyn Robertson
noted that Auburn's M Street overpass was fully funded and the project should be
completed in 2013. She said that his project will help pave the way for the region to use
the Stampede Pass line. Geri Poor from the Port of Seattle underscored the need to
158
SCATBd Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2011
Page 3
complete SR 509 corridor, and noted that funding preservation and maintenance projects
was critical for the region. Ms. Poor said that the Stampede Pass improvement project
might be a good candidate for a public /private partnership project arrangement.
III. Reports, Communications and Citizen Requests to Comment
Chair Snoey reported that he attended October's Regional Access Mobility Project
(RAMP) meeting where Paula Hammond updated the group on state projects and
reported on state needs and the revenue short falls the state is now experiencing. He said
that the SR 167 and Cross Base Highway projects were Pierce County's high priority
projects. He reported that these projects are at the forefront of the discussions now going
on at the state level. He said that Eastern Washington Legislators are aware and
understand the need for these projects.
Councilmember Burbidge briefed the Board on the Transportation Policy Board (TPB)
meeting that was held on October 13. She said that TPB was briefed on the progress on
the project prioritization process. She reported that the PSRC will go ahead on the project
selection process for possible 2012 Federal grant funds, and a task force will be formed to
discuss the project selection criteria. Councilmember Shape announced the ribbon
cutting of a new electric charging station in front of the SeaTac City Hall.
Councilmember Palmer said that Renton is also getting charging stations in front of their
city hall, and reported on the opening of a new parking garage in downtown and at the
Landing. Councilmember Hernandez reported that the City of Tukwila's urban access
center is now open for business and congratulated Tukwila Public Works director Bob
Giberson for job well down.
IV. Sound Transit Update
Brian Stout, from Sound Transit (ST), began the briefing with an update of Sound
Transit's revenue forecasts. Mr. Stout explained the differences between the existing
revenue forecasts and the forecast that was done prior to the ST 2 vote in 2008. He said
that in ST's earlier forecast it anticipated a slowdown in the economy but not the
recession that occurred in 2009. There was a 15% drop in sales tax forecasts between the
2008 forecast and the 2011 forecast. Mr. Stout said that about 90% of ST's revenues
come from sales tax. The 2008 forecast estimated that it would collect about $15.7
billion in sales taxes between 2009 through 2013; current ST forecast now calls for about
$11.7 billion to be collected in same time period. The South King County subarea is
down about $894 million, or 32% less than what was originally forecasted.
Mr. Stout also said that compared to actual sales tax revenues received to date in 2011,
ST is slightly ahead of last year's receipts. Revenue is up about 2.5% over last year.
Chair Snoey said that he did not see the 34% drop in sales tax revenues based on city
revenue reports. Mr. Stout said the 34% difference was a comparison between forecasts
not actual numbers. He said that they were comfortable with their 2011 forecast, they are
159
SCATBd Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2011
Page 4
currently off by 0.7% of their forecast. ST has determined that even if the forecast were
off by 5% they could still be able to complete light rail down to Kent/Des Moines Road
area.
Rachel Smith gave a brief update on the Tukwila Sounder Station. She said that ST was
currently in the process of building a permanent station at the current temporary Tukwila
Station location in Long Acres. The design of the station will be completed in 2012 and
construction is planned to start in August- September of 2012 and will be completed in
December 2013. Ms. Smith noted that there were design changes to the parking and
platform area to accommodate Strander Boulevard.
Chair Snoey asked Tom Gut to give a brief update on the SR 509 technical advisory
meeting that was held on October 5 Mr. Gut reported that WSDOT was looking a three
tolling alternatives and what can be constructed in the initial phases of the project.
WSDOT is currently looking at the traffic and tolling numbers of the three alternatives.
Action: Mr. Snoey asked for a motion from the Board to approve a support
letter for Sound Transit's TIGER III application to extend light rail to S.
200th Street in the City of SeaTac. The motion was made, seconded and
approved to send a SCATBd letter of support for ST's TIGER III grant
application.
II. King County's Strategic Plan for Roads Services (SPRS) Briefing
Doug Hodson, King County Road Services Division, briefed the Board on King County
Road Services Strategic Plan. He said the main theme of the strategic plan is to focus on
a smaller set of priorities because of the Division's declining revenues. Mr. Hodson
noted that while the unincorporated area was getting smaller, traffic from cities still
played a big role in the County's transportation system. He said that 65% of the
Division's revenues come from property taxes and 12% come from gas tax, both of
which have been declining in recent years. Reimbursable fees also provide some
funding, and includes maintenance work that the County does for cities. The top three
priorities for the Division are meeting its regulatory needs, meeting its core safety needs,
and maintaining the existing road network. Addressing mobility needs and capacity
needs are lower priorities
Mr. Hodson said the County does not have enough revenues to fulfill its top three
priorities. He said that the County needed $170 $180 million annually, to maximize the
life cycle of its existing transportation system. The County's Strategic Plan calls for
about $120 $130 million annually which would allow a moderate decline in the
County's transportation assets. Mr. Hodson, however, said the County currently has a
$20 to $30 million shortfall -it has a little over half of what it needs to maintain the
current condition is transportation assets.
160
SCATBd Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2011
Page 5
This shortfall has caused King County to propose a tiered service level approach on how
it will maintain its assets and to make the most of its limited revenues. The County is
proposing to designate all of the County's roadway into one of five tiers:
Tier 1 Most vital roads in the network will receive the highest level of storm
response, including the first roads to receive snow removal. Users of Tier 1 roads
should expect good road and bridge condition and well maintained drainage.
These roads will receive the highest level of maintenance and preservation
Tier 2 Heavily traveled roads will receive a lower level of storm and snow
response. Will receive maintenance to keep them in good condition. In general,
preservation efforts will be more reactive and prioritized based on level of risk
and availability of funding.
Tier 3 Highly used local roads will receive little to no storm and snow response,
especially during significant storms. Maintenance and preservation will focus on
slowing deterioration, but users should expect to see wear and tear to roadways,
possible load limits, lower posted speed limits, and long -term partial closures.
Tier 4 Local roads with a single access point will receive virtually no storm and
snow response. Maintenance will be limited to activities that preserve access.
Users may expect to see a number of one -lane roads with some downgraded to a
gravel surface, depending on the level of deterioration and availability of funding.
Tier 5 Local roads that have alternative routes available for travel in case of
road closures will receive virtually no storm and snow response. Maintenance will
be limited and based on factors such as life safety and risk, resulting in a growing
number of deteriorating roads. Users can expect to see some closures, which may
result in longer detours and difficulty accessing property. These roads may also be
downgraded to a gravel surface, restricted to one lane, and have load limits and
lower speed limits.
Mr. Hodson said that this approach is now before the King County Council for
consideration and that they are currently meeting with stakeholders to explain this asset
management proposal. Mr. Hodson said that they are also taking the opportunity to work
with the Governor's Connecting Washington Task Force and their outreach with cities to
talk about possible new revenue sources that would make up some of the revenue
shortfalls. Mr. Arkills pointed out that despite the recent annexations of unincorporated
areas into cities; King County still has to pay for the debt service on the roads it built in
the past. He mentioned the South Park Bridge as an example and noted that even if
Seattle annexes the bridge, King County will still have to pay off the bonds. Chair Snoey
asked Ms. Atherton about what the Council thought about this proposal. Ms. Atherton
said that Council staff is currently reviewing the proposal, and it is a high priority topic at
the Council. Chair Snoey ask Mr. Hodson how the County will address those arterials
that straddle city /county line. Mr. Hodson said that this is part of the discussions that
they are having with the public work directors of those cities.
161
SCATBd Meeting Minutes
September 20, 2011
Page 6
Chair Snoey reminded the Board that Pat McCarthy, Pierce County Executive, was going
to attend the next meeting, and that he was looking for volunteers for a nominating
Committee for next year's Chair and Vice Chair.
Other Attendees:
Cathy Mooney, City of Kent
Jim Seitz, City of Renton
Doug Hodson, King County
Dennis Dowdy, City of Auburn
Brian Stout, Sound Transit
Rick Perez, City of Federal Way
Tom Rasmussen, City of Seattle
Councilmember
Bob Giberson, City of Tukwila
Rachel Smith, Sound Transit
Paul Takamine, King County DOT
Monica Whitman, SCA
Karen Goroski, SCA
Cathal Ridge, Sound Transit
Doug Levy
162